IDC Agenda 04-15-1999•
AGENDA
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Thursday, April 15, 1999 - 7:00 a.m.
City Hall
MEMBERS: Chair Shelley Johnson, Vice Chair Tom Ollig, Don Smith, Ken Maus, Kevin Doty,
Tom Lindquist, Bill Tapper, Dick Van Allen, Bob Mosford, and Marianna Khauv.
COUNCIL LIAISON: Mayor Roger Belsaas.
STAFF: Rick Wolfsteller, Jeff O'Neill, Fred Patch, and Ollie Koropchak.
GUEST: Bret Weiss, WSB, Inc.
Call to Order.
2. Consideration to approve the March 18, 1999 IDC minutes.
3. Consideration of Reports:
a) Mayor Belsaas - MOAA and Other
b) Koropchak -Prospect and Other.
4. Consideration to hear the trunk fee analysis for sanitary sewer and water and to determine
a position of the IDC for recommendation to the City Council meeting of Apri126.
(Tabled from March meeting)
Consideration to elect or appoint an individual to record and prepare the IDC minutes.
(Item tabled from February and March meeting)
6. Consideration of a report on the acquisition and development of publicly-owned industrial
parks in Big Lake and Buffalo and the economic impact to the city and developer.
(Tabled for further discussion. Summarize, define issue(s), and determine future direction
if necessary.)
7. Other Business: Remember Industrial Breakfast, Thursday, April 22, 7:30 a.m.,
Riverwood Conference Center.
8. Adjournment.
•
•
MINUTES
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Thursday, March 18, 1999 - 7:00 a.m.
City Hall
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Shelly Johnson, Don Smith, Ken Maus, Bill Tapper, Tom
Lindquist, Bob Mosford, and Marianna Khauv.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Vice Chair Tom Ollig, Kevin Doty, and Dick Van Allen.
COUNCIL LIAISON ABSENT: Mayor Roger Belsaas.
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Rick Wolfsteller, Jeff O'Neill, and Ollie Koropchak.
GUEST: Bret Weiss, WSB, Inc.
Call to Order.
•
2. Consideration to approve the February 18, 1999 IDC minutes.
Tom Lindquist made a motion to approve the February 18, 1999 IDC minutes. Seconded
by Bob Mosford and with no corrections or additions, the minutes were approved as
written.
Consideration of activity reports:
a) In lieu of the absence of the Mayor, Koropchak informed IDC members that the
Planning Commission and City Council agreed to a land use plan similar to the IDC's
recommendation of February 18. The exception to the IDC recommendation was the
property lying east of Silver Springs Golf Course, north of the proposed Chelsea Road,
and abutting I-94, this the Planning and Council agreed to revert from industrial to
residential. Based on the City Planner's recommendation, the proposed commercial strip
parallel to South Trunk Highway 25 (Gold Nugget parcel) to be at a depth of 300-400 ft.
On March 8, the Council approved the land use plan as agreed upon between the Planning
Commission and City Council. On March 22, the Council will ratify its position of March
8 through the adoption of a resolution for submission to the April 7 MOAA meeting.
b) Executive Director's report -The IDC accepted the attached report from Koropchak.
•
4. Consideration of a report on the acquisition and development of public-owned industrial
parks in Big Lake and Buffalo and the economic impact to the cit~(subsidvl and the
developer (incentive).
At the January IDC meeting, Koropchak was directed to research incentives offered by the
neighbor communities of Big Lake and Buffalo. Attached is Koropchak's research. In
• IDC Minutes
March 18, 1999
summary, the two communities purchased land at a fair market value, constructed the
infrastructure, and give-away developed lots for $1. It was a conscious decision by those
communities for purpose of increasing the local tax base. Big Lake and Buffalo do not
use TIF to assist a business; therefore, the city is not subject to a local match or penalty
and job/wage goal reporting. Big Lake in the future may use TIF to recover
infrastructure development costs.
Taking the information from the neighboring communities, the fee study as reported to the
IDC by Fred Patch in August, and assuming the construction of a 30,000 sq ft building;
Koropchak compared the three communities from the perspective of annual taxes,
developer's costs, subsidy by cities, and developer's advantage.
Using the illustration of the Midwest Graphics projection, IDC members felt Monticello's
total package of $181,000 and $19,223 write-down of trunk storm sewer fee appeared to
be a better deal than Buffalo or Big Lake. In other words, it's all in how the deal is
packaged. Koropchak was unsure as the $181,000 is not up-front dollars (not equity) but
reimbursed dollars over time, therefore, the company needs to borrow the money at a time
they are short-on-cash plus pay a $5,000 fee. Additionally, Koropchak sees actual dollars
invested by the City of Monticello as greater than those invested by Buffalo and Big Lake
because of the higher land costs and the local penalty required for use of TIF.
IDC members found the incentive information of interest and worth further discussion;
however, in lieu of time, they agreed to table for further discussion.
5. Consideration to hear the trunk fee analysis for sanitary sewer and water and to determine
a position of the IDC for recommendation to the City Council meeting of March 22.
In lieu of time and members departing, Chair Johnson suggested to table the presentation
until the April IDC meeting and apologized to Bret Weiss. Members agreed to table the
presentation. The analysis will not appear on the Council agenda of March 22.
6. Consideration to elect or appoint an individual to record and prepare IDC minutes.
O'Neill reported that Nancy Whalen was not interested in the appointment; however,
O'Neill reported Dawn Grossinger expressed interest based on Kitty Baltos' blessing. The
item was tabled until the April IDC meeting.
7. Other Business.
None.
•
Z
• IDC Minutes
March 18, 1999
Adjournment.
The IDC meeting adjourned at 8:30 a.m.
~~ ~ p'1 ~~
Recorder
•
•
3. b~ Director's report:
IDC Agenda -March 18, 1999
EDA Report -The Council and EDA recently approved a real estate loan for Groebner
& Associates, Inc. in the amount of $100,000 at 5.75% interest rate.
The EDA has approved 11 industrial loans for an investment of $798,000 over 10 years.
Four loans reached their balloon payment date and were paid in full. All remaining loan
paybacks are current. The EDA year-end financials show acash-in-bank balance of
$555,046. Combining the fund balance ofthe FSI-UDAG $170,209 and the fund balance
of the Aroplax-SCREG $60,453, the total sources of funds available to the EDA January
1, 1999, was $785,709. The EDA administers the GMEF and DMRF programs.
The EDA amended the GMEF Guidelines to include a wage level goal for consistency
with the State's job and wage level reporting form attached.
HRA Report -Since 1982, the HRA has provided TIF assistance to 17 industrial
businesses. Five of those districts have decertified. The total amount invested by the
HRA for industrial development since 1982 is $1,840,000. In 1998, that investment
generated taxes in the amount of $583,915. 622 jobs have been created. If you assume
an average wage of $10 per hour, exclusive of benefits, the annual wages total
$12,937,600.
Additionally, the HRA has 2 Housing Districts, 5 Redevelopment Districts, and 1 Soils
District.
Bus Tour -The annual Mayor's bus tour of the City of Monticello sponsored by the
City/HRA is scheduled for Wednesday, June 9, 1999. Following the gratis lunch, the
City/HIZA will provide gratis tickets to their guests for the Chamber Golf Fundraiser at
the Silver Springs Golf Course. Guest are lenders, brokers, contractors, consultants, etc.
Industrial Breakfast - A reminder. Thursday, Apri122, 7:30 a.m., Riverwood
Conference Center. At the April 15 IDC meeting, IDC members will be asked to contact
three industrial businesses the week of the breakfast as a reminder and encouragement to
attend. Invitations will be mailed by the Chamber, the sponsor of the event.
City Newsletter - In the quarterly City Newsletter for distribution the end of March, you
will note a business spotlight feature. This is part of the marketing plan to improve the
public awareness of who are the leaders and what do those industrial businesses do. The
City Newsletter is mailed to city water/sewer users by the billing address.
Brochure - 15 mailed on February 27.
• Follow-up calls begin.
• IDC Agenda -March 18, 1999
Trade Shows -Received list of convention at Minneapolis and RiverCentre. Association
of Manufacturing Engineer Show, May 4-6, Mpls Convention Center.
BRE -Mailed "thank you" to Paul and Steve Schoen for industrial lead and a "note of
concern" to Bill and Merrilyn Seefeldt relating to loss caused by the recent fire.
Tour -Steve Krenz of Midwest Graphics prefers a tour for the IDC, commission and
council members only on Thursday, April 1, 3:00 P.M. He's plans to have an open house
for the community later. Invitations will be mailed.
Prospects:
Nordine Electronics -Looking for someone to purchase company or venture capital.
Burglar alarms for outdoor recreational equipment and farms. (security system)
Kleer-Flo -Called to say "thanks" for brochure. No plans to expand or relocate at this
time but will keep us in mind.
Allied Companies -Plans to construct first phase of 40,000 sq ft for rental of commercial
sales. Second phase for industrial rent. No plans submitted to city hall.
Corporate headquarters and warehouse -large, 20 acres (5/6 acres outdoor storage), 100
employees within 2 years.
Large user -Still working on plans, likelihood need for space, product growing, 75-100
acres, initial manufacturing, warehouse, demo (indoor-outdoor), 18 months, site in-state,
work through Peoria, IL,, call mid April, Set up meeting with City Planning. Requested
confidentiality.
Machine Shop in Fridley -Small company, pending contact, call again in September
Cabinetry -Check in, on vacation, call back in two weeks.
Small start-up -Confidential. 1,500 sq ft for lease. Referred to Barger and Allied.
Follow-up: 3 -call in one year
2 messages
3 maybe/who knows, call back in one year
10 dead file
•
~J
CITY OF BIG LAKE
Curt Jacobson, Administrator -March 8, 1999
History -Large OAA district comprised of 23 districts. In 1992, the township and city made an
agreement to annex and share the tax base forever. With a MTED grant to assist in extending the
water and sewer trunk lines to the Remmele Plants (80 acres), the first phase was complete.
In 1996, the city and township agreed to share a 50/50 split in the costs to purchase and develop,
as well as, to share a 50/50 split of the revenues (industrial tax base) from 80 acres to the north
and across US Highway 10. They proceeded in acquiring the 80 acres from three property
owners who had marketed the property for years unsuccessfully. They purchased the property for
$3,500 per acre with adown-payment from reserves and a contract for deed. Annual payments
due January 2 of each year. Following purchase of the property they annexed the 80 acres into
the city.
In September 1998, the EDA issued a General Obligation Bond for infrastructure development
plus two years capitalized interest. The water/sewer trunk lines were extended northerly under
US Highway 10 to the first three accessible sites and the road constructed without curb at a cost
of $400,000 for Phase I. Phase II will cost an additional $600,000 to develop. Assessments are
deferred. The road and utility lines are in place to the "Y" road point only. The planned road
alignment will preserve the existing evergreen trees. Parcels will be platted as sold. The storm
sewer is handled internally through ponding and they foreseen no need for storm sewer trunk
lines.
The purpose is to increase the tax base. The City recognizes economic development is a risk.
They elected to follow the concept of Anoka, Ramsey, and Andover for development of the park.
They minimize their risk by sharing expenses with the township and agreed to the share the
revenue as a tool for establishment of their orderly annexation agreement. Job creation is not the
purpose and is secondary. Big Lake had five acres of industrial land available along the railroad
track.
The industrial park has covenants: The exterior walls of the building must be of 100% tip-up
panel concrete, landscaping, etc.
Incentive: The price per lot is $1. A lot consists of 4 times the size of the proposed industrial
building. Example: A proposed 40,000 sq ft building times 4 equals 160,000 sq. ft. The
160,000 sq. ft. or 3.67 acres is at a cost of $1. This allows for a company to expand up to 50%.
Additional land is available at a cost of $1 per sq. ft. They have no loan programs. Because job
creation is secondary, they encourage distribution and warehouse facilities as well as
manufacturing facilities.
The city does not create a TIF District to assist the developer with land write-down; therefore, the
city is not obligated to report job and wage level goals to the State Auditor nor does a company
need to worry about potential refunding of assistance. The city could and may create a TIF
District upon recruiting an industrial to recover their investment for land and infrastructure
development. It is their hope to recover those costs over time. The city is prepared to levy for
the bond payments if necessary.
They have had some interested parties; however, did not mention any committed developments.
They too indicate even with a partial road constructed and a proposed concept for lot
development, it is difficult for business owners to grasp.
COST TO DEVELOP: Land for $l.
No cost water/sewer trunk lines.
Normal building permit fees.
WAC/SAC Fees and minimum storm sewer fee.
CITY OF BUFFALO
Mert Auger, Administrator, and Laureen Bodin, Assistant Administrator -March 11, 1999
History -Mert was hired by the City in 1977 and the priority of the community (community
support) was to increase the tax base or industrial development. Other sites were considered with
railroad access before the final selection to purchase the first 40 acres in 1985. The park lies in a
northeasterly direction from the new Cub Store on Highway 55 East and does not have rail
accessibility. The parcel was purchased for $3,500 per acre and annexed. In 1990, they
purchased were second 40 acres at $3,800 per acre. There is potential for additional land across
a county road.
The land purchase and infrastructure development was funded through the City-Owned Electric
Company. They have recruited 13 businesses.
The park has covenants: No metal buildings and no outdoor storage. Job creation is a guideline
with no reporting. They market to industrial businesses who are high users of electricity. Their
return on invest is to the electric company owned by the city. Generally high users of electricity,
pay good wages. Example: one company's electric bill is $35,000 per month.
The deal is simple: The price per lot is $1. A lot is defined as the ability to double the size of the
original building plus required setbacks and parking. Example: 40,000 sq ft building times 2
equals 80,000 sq ft plus setbacks and parking. This a computed by the city engineer. There are
no assessments for infrastructure. Astorm sewer fee appears on the utility bill. The City does not
use TIF to assist industrial businesses because of the LGA/HACA Penalty, small amount of tax
increment actually to the city, and no reporting to State. The agreement includes a reversion
cause. A fee title is provided by the city. They offer no loan program.
Through the electric company a fiber optic system is being provided and available to businesses.
COST TO DEVELOP: Land for $1.
No cost water/sewer trunk lines.
1988 UBC and normal fees.
WAC/SAC Fees
Storm sewer fee on utility bill.
•
DEVELOPMENT COST COMPARISON
PROJECT: 30,000 sq ft tip-up concrete manufacturing building at an estimated market value
of $1,200,000 fora 1998 net tax capacity of $46,050. (100x300ft)
2.75 acres or 120,000 sq ft of industrial land (300x400ft).
ANNUAL TAXES
Monticello Big Lake Buffalo
1998 $54,638 $54,983 $58,437
DEVELOPERS COSTS
Monticello Big Lake Buffalo
Land Private Public Public
$30,000 per acre $1 per lot $1 per lot
. Water Trunk $625 per acre $0 $0
Sanitary Trunk $1,250 per acre $0 $0
Storm Trunk $4,933 per acre Minimum fee Utility Bill
Bldg Permit 1994 UBC Schedule 1994 UBC Schedule 1988 UBC
Schedule
WAC Line + materials
SAC $2,500 per unit $2,400 per unit $3,700 per
unit
Building Construction
Site Improvements
SUBSIDY BY CITY
Land TIF $82,500 $9,625 $10,450
Water Trunk TIF $ 1,718 $13,750 ?
Sanitary Trunk TIF $ 3,438 $13,750 ?
• Storm Trunk TIF $13,566 ? ?
WAC Penalty/Contribution Business Business
SAC Penalty/Contribution Business Business
TOTALS $101,222 $37,125 $10,450+
Four years of TIF +
$ 22,000 Local Match
DEVELOPERS ADVANTAGE
Monticello Big Lake Buffalo
Land Costs
Finance Costs Reimbursement * Up-front *Up-front
Water Trunk * Up-front *Up-front
Sanitary Trunk * Up-front * Up-front
• Storm Sewer Trunk "
WAC
SAC
Utility Rates
Loan Program
No Job/Wage Goals
No Potential Assistance Payback
Deal Negotiations *
and Simple (Public)
Timing
Taxes
Taxing Jurisdictions
Transportation I-94 Highway 10 Highway 55
• Access
i Covenants
Land Use Fees
Building Fees
U
.J
City I Big Lake Buttab
• P~:rmit Type b Structure t-!! 612-263-2107 612-8E4-5404
i
`U C . C~ C C: •~, \ V\ ~ ~~'~ `r ~ c;.~. o `Y~ ; ~-Z •~ vn ~ c~ . ~+ ~ l'}-Li-'lSL1
`~ Q e..v2~ u"~.. '~3~- ~ ~ Qom. ~ v~ v~Q..f2../~-
CONSTRUCTION ~~ ' ~° a~ ~
BIG PLAN/REVIEW..:.:...::, ;:';:.::-;..
(Fee Sch..Year) ~ .
BLDG DEMO
.'17980.00 ~ is°„~12.901.-
BLDG MOVING
PLUMBING
FIRE SUPRESSION PERMIT
FEE
. .
25
FIRE ALARM PERMIT FEE
GAS PIPING PERMIT FEE
Subtotal
City Ranking by
Tota t
°°y :; ~1
18,005.50 13,391.72
• UTILITY CONNECT!(
SEYYER CONNECT PERMIT
FEE. • ....... -'!~~:s.
WATER CONNECT PERMIT .:: "::~-::;
FEE'
........ ........... .... , ;
rj~:..._
SEINER b WATER COMB.....:
......:::
PERMfT FEE '~~:.~.
Subtotal
City Ranking by
Total
UTlLITYACCESS
subtotal
Mooticelb
612-2953060
~ 1+Z ~ `~gp •j~~
12,184.25
City Big Lake Btrtfab
' Permit Type b Strudurc 612-263-2107 612-634404
1,~4N~ USE ~ dQ f~ ~ ~ ~~ G ~--
... .... ..... _...,..•650: .. .. .. ... .. ._.-.:125.
PLAT/SUBDMSION .. .: .. . , ..
SIMPLE DMSION 700• 75.
µonticelb
612-295x060
~~°3~,~
,:: .~..~ .. ..760.0
CUP
PUD
REZOMNG . _..
HOME OCCUPATION
........
SIGNS::.. ~..'.
350 sau.u~
700. 200.OC
0. 0.0(
........... ..........D .. ,._ .._ .....-... ~ 15.0(
500_ 150.0(
3so.a
.. .. .:..:.::...:... 0.0
... .. 25.
r~
OTHER
Planning Fees
Subtotal
City ranking by
Total
PARK DEDICATION
Grand Total
28.43/1000 C 30.59/1000 C
1122J1000 C 14.59!1000 C
0. S2 per month, residential
options
Homeowners contra 57.99 (35 yal can); 513.9
(65 gal can); S21.99 (95 pa
can
0. New Constr. 5500 access
Res. SS ~fl + .0525; Co
58.50 ~9 + .
Storm sewer S2.SNmonth
residerr6a
18.65110_00 C
9.75/1000 CF
0.0
0.0
0.0
City Ranking by
Total
1,000.00 490.00
9 2
i 800.
77,045.50 100,fi31.72
4 9
1,135.00
12
r-----'- o.o
130,777.25
10
ELECTRICAL
OTHER
A conversion factor of 7.48
was use to convert galbns to
CF
UTILITY RATES
SANITARY SEVYER
WATER
RECYCLING
REFUSE
I`~
U
FEE CHANGES AND PROPOSED CHANGES
City of Monticello
Chanses since IDC meeting of August 1998 (New
Old New Proposed
Uniform Building Code 1988 1994
Sewer Connect Permit Fee $20 $50
Water Connect Permit Fee $20 $50
Sewer/Water Comb. Permit Fee $30 $80
Sewer Access Charge $2,000 per unit $2,500 per unit
Water Access Charge
Trunk Water $625 per acre $900 per acre
Trunk Sanitary Sewer $1,250 per acre $1,750 per
acre
Trunk Storm Sewer $4,933 per acre +$
New construction for Additions
•
1999 Minnesota Business Assistance Form
(Please return by April 1, 1999)
Please complete lines 1 through 16 for all agreements.
~1tt23ESOT,9
~"
Trade & -
Econonuc
Development
1. Funding government agency name 2. Contact name
3. Agency street address 4. City
5. Zip code 6. Phone number (area code) 8. Type of government agency
ional State
Count
Re
Cit
7. Fax number (area code) y -
g
y -
Other (Please indicate)
9. Name of business receiving assistance 10. Industry of recipient (SIC code)
11. Type of assistance (e.g. loan, TIF, grant, infrastructure, etc.) 12. Name of TIF district (if applicable)
13. Date of business
assistance agreement 14. Date assistance fast
provided 15. Date project (building/
machinery/etc.) was
placed in service 16. Dollar value of business
assistance
For assistance agreements signed between July 1,1995 and December 31,1997, ~mplete lines 17 through 20. For
agreements signed during 1998 and future years, please complete lines 21 through 24.
17. Job creation goals for business receiving assistance 18. Average hourly wage level goals for business receiving
assistance
19. Actual jobs created since business received assistance 20. Actual average hourly wage paid to employees hired since
business received assistance
Goals of business receiving assistance: (Please indicate Actual performance since project placed in service: (Please
number of employees at each wage level and indicate the indicate number of employees at each wage level and indicate
corresponding benefit level.) the corresponding benefit level.)
21. Job Creation Hourly Wage 22. Hourly Val 23. Job Creation Hourly Wage 24. Hourly Value
Level of Voluntary Level of Voluntary
Full-time Part-time (excl. benefits) Benefits ($) Full-time Part-time (excl. benefits) Benefits ($)
less than $7.00 less than $7.00
$7.00 to $7.99 $7.00 to $7.99
$8.00 to $9.99 $8.00 to $9.99
$10.00 to $11.99 $10.00 to $11.99
$12.00 and higher $12.00 and higher
If necessary, please attach additional documentation. If necessary, please attach additional documentation.
Please complete lines 25 through 27 for all agreements.
25. Last date actual wage and job creation levels documented 26. Date this Minnesota Business Assistance Form completed
27. Have all wage and job goals been achieved? Yes - do not submit future forms for this project.
^ No - lease submit the 2000 Minnesota Business Assistance Form.
This form replaces all previous forms. Please complete one form for each business assistance agreement your
agency signed between July 1, 1995 and December 31, 1998 which provided $25,000 or more in public funds
or used tax increment financing. A form should be submitted annually for each assistance agreement until a
submitted form indicates that all wage and job creation goals have been achieved. Do not submit this form if
your agency has not agreed to provide assistance to a business since July 1, 1995.
(over)
~~1.1NESp1~
~/"'`
Trade & ,
Econonuc
Development
Please send completed form annually by Apri11,1999 to:
Minnesota Business Assistance Form - AEO
Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development
Analysis and Evaluation Office
500 Metro Squaze
121 East 7th Place
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
or fax report to:
(651)215-3841
For information, call:
(651)297-2335 or1-800-657-3858
Minnesota Statutes 116J.991:
A business that receives state or local government assistance for economic development
or job growth purposes must create a net increase in jobs in Minnesota within two years of
receiving tlu? assistance.
The government agency providing the assistance must establish wage level and job creation
goals to be met by the business receiving the assistance. A business that fails to meet the goals
must repay the assistance to the government agency.
Each government agency must report the wage and job goals and the results for each
project in. achieving those goals to the department of trade and economic development. The
department shall compile and publish the results of the reports for the previous calendar year
by June 1 of each year. The reports of the agencies to the department and the compilation
report of the department shall be made available to the public.
For the purposes of this section, "assistance" means a grant or loan in excess of $25,000,
or tax increment financing.
•
•
~ ~
~ ~ cu
` O ~
Q> ~ ~
N
W a~ - .-.
Q ~ .V N
~ Q ~ ~
Q ~
y~.rno~
t- ~LoC
U ~ ~ ~
Q Q ~ ~
Q O
U ~ ~
X ~ ~ ~
~ ~ U ~
Q f-
Z
O
O ~, ,r
~ c `~
O ~
O O X
Q U ~
__ ~_ ~
~ ~ ~ U
i ~ ~ D.
~' ~' U
~~ ~
~ ~ o.
c~ ~ «f
-- U
X
N ~
~ ~
as '~- a.
Q ~ o U
~ ~- U
W
Q
m ~ x
Q
n
~~.U
c :~.
~ ~ ~
3 f- n.
o `~
a U
~ x ?,
~ cii !-~
~-- U
i (~
~ d
O ~
U
C
O
f`
c>3
~ a
O
~J
a o p.
~ ~ ~: rn
00 ~ ~ .ON-
r ~ r
a !0 0(~
l~ ~ ~ O
M C7
N ~ N ~
o ~ a
co ~ ca
~'
,~ ~
~ ~
G ... p
Q ~ O
ao
N ~ M N
o ~c
~' ~
~ ' O ~'
M N M
O O O
cp ~''~ tD
N
N N ~
~ ~ N
V' N ~ '.
O ~ a
00 ~ ca ~ °°
r-
,~A O~//~~ M
` - W
r
O i O O
~ i N ~
r, CV 00
M
O ~ f~ ~
~ 1 C'7
~!' N ~
r
Os<1 ~ N
n t c'7 ~
~ CA
O t ~ i.
N Y' 4
~~ J ~~
n
C ~m I m
+~' O cn
C
~ .~-r ~
~ ~ ~ ~
N ~ (~
'W U
~ ~
i ~
i ~ 'V
i '`
O
'_ O E ~
~ E ~
~ U ~
> ~
~ ~ LL
a
~ ~
~ ~' C
C
~ O
C O ~ ~
~a Q
~ ~ ~
~ t.
~ C ~
C !v ~
~ O ~ N
` ~ E
ate=
~ Z j
~ :T J
U
~ ~
~ 0 ~
W
Q
Q
~ ~ ~
} d0 .~ O
W rn ~ ~
J r ~
~ U U
Z
Q
Q
Q
~rn~U
°' U Q
~ r
1
1
1
1
O ~~
°' U ~
~ N
i N
v~ ctf
i ~ O ~
i ~ ~ ~
i Q ~ `"_
In
W
O
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
X ~ ~ x
~av~
~ ~
~~ ~
~ ~ ~
i ~ ~ ~
Q U ~
0
cD
0
~~
f~ l
CV ~
r 1
~'
M ~
O
0
~;
N +
00 ~
o
~ i
~ i
~~
d: ~
r I
~ .
cD .
of
~~
~~
r
~~
t~
~ i
r
a~ c
ca
r
r 1
r~ c
N t
~ 1
_o
i
(D ~
O 1
O 1
~ ~
O
'`\
0
~ .
r„ .
M i
~;
~ '
p
r
b ;i
N I
o'
0
!70 -.
0
M
O'
N
r
O
M
~'
M.
0
O
C7
00
M
r I'
0
co
O
0
~ I
tD
Qp
~'
O
O .'
O
C7
O
N
C
O
0
cD
(D
CV
b
»
Q
h~
r
rn
~~
'd'
N
~o
C13
M
d'
N
r
'`^J
W
M
. cD
M
N
V
N.
M
(V
d'
cD
0
O
~.
O
O
CJ
d
~f
Cfl