IDC Agenda 02-05-2008AGENDA
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Tuesday, February 5, 2008 - 7:00 a.m.
Bridge Room, 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, MN
MEMBERS: Chair Mike Benedetto, Vice Chair Bill Tapper, Dick Van Allen, Don Roberts, Dan Olson,
Barb Schwientek, Lynne Dahl-Fleming, Don Tomann, Jim Johnson, Zona Gutzwiller,
Patrick Thompson, and Sandy Suchy.
COUNCIL LIAISONS: Mayor Clint Herbst and Council Member Wayne Mayer.
STAFF: Ollie Koropchak,.
GUEST: Scott Johnson, Manager, Community & Local Gov't Relations, Xcel Energy.
IDC MISSION STATEMENT: To increase the industrial tax base, to create jobs at
liveable wage-levels, and to maintain a favorable ;and
desirable industrial environment in the City of Monticello.
7:00 a.m. 1. Call to Order. (Please read the minutes and information prior to the meeting.)
7:05 2. Vote to approve the January 8, 2008 IDC minutes.
7:07 3. Old Business:
A. Review the IDC subcommittee recommendation and approve a
motion requesting the City Council at their February 11, 2008
meeting consider adoption of the resolution recognizing the
Industrial Development Committee.
7:30 4. New Business:
A. A status report on the electrical substation at Lake Pulaski near Buffalo
and plans for a new substation in Monticello. Scott Johnson, Xcel
Energy.
B. Motion to accept the resignation from Mary Barger.
C. Update on recruitment of candidates for IDC membership and motion to
confum.
8:00 5. Reports:
A. Mayor -YMCA, Comp Plan Open House.
B. Fiber Optic and Marketing Committee.
C. Economic Development.
D. Chamber.
8.20 6. Review the draft copy of the February 5, 2008 Planning Commission Agenda for
industrial related items. Discuss and vote on an IDC position or action if
necessary.
8:25 7. Other Business.
A. Next IDC meeting -Tuesday, March 4, 2008 (Annual meeting).
B. Other.
8:30 8. Adjournment.
MINUTES
MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Tuesday, January 8, 2008 - 7:00 a.m.
Bridge Room, 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, MN
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Mike Benedetto, Vice Chair Bill Tapper, Dick Van Allen, Don
Roberts, Dan Olson, Barb Schwientek, Lynne Dahl-Fleming, and Zona
Gutzwiller.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Jim Johnson, Don Tomann, Patrick Thompson, and Sandy Suchy.
COUNCIL LIAISON PRESENT: Council Member Wayne Mayer.
STAFF PRESENT: Ollie Koropchak, Jeff O'Neill, and Angela Schumann.
LEGAL FIRM REPRESENTATIONJoeI Jamnik, Campbell-Knutson Law Firm.
IDC MISSION STATEMENT: To increase the industrial tax base, to create jobs at
liveable wage-levels, and to maintain a favorable and
desirable industrial environment in the City of
Monticello.
1. Call to Order. (Please read the minutes and information prior to the meeting.)
IDC Chair Mike Benedetto called the IDC meeting to order at 7:07 a.m. declaring a quorum
and welcomed Attorney Joel Jamnik.
2. Vote to approve the December 4.2007 IDC minutes.
BILL TAPPER MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE DECEMBER 4, 2007 IDC
MINUTES. DON ROBERTS SECONDED THE MOTION AND WITH NO
CORRECTIONS OR ADDITIONS, THE MINUTES WERE APPROVED AS WRITTEN.
3. Old Business:
A. Review the summary and strengths/weaknesses for the ~umose to discuss and vote on
the proposed three organizational structure options for the Monticello IDC.
B.
DOES THE CITY SEE A NEED FOR AN INDEPENDENT
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE (IDC)? THE IDC
DESIRES THE CONTINUED INVOLVEMENT OF THE CITY
COUNCIL AND THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
1
IDC Minutes - 01/08/08
City Administrator Jeff O'Neill stated the Council wants the involvement of the IDC and the
three options outlined allows for the IDC to select or determine which option -what does the
IDC want? O'Neill presented Option I (see attachment) noting with the reconstituted EDA
consisting of seven members including two council members, the IDC would serve under the
EDA. This option would strengthen both the EDA and IDC with some loss of confidentiality
due to the open meeting law.
O'Neill presented Option II (see attachment) noting the IDC would operate as a separate
group except there would be an agreement between the City and IDC. The agreement would
give some sense of formalization between the City and IDC while providing the City with
documentation for the purpose of a legal compliance check (State Auditor). The
documentation would include: how the IDC relates to economic development and its public
purpose. According to O'Neill, this option appears to be the best of both worlds.
Option III (see attachment) retains the current IDC structure which is to operate independently
as a public action group. Strengths and weaknesses of each option were identified. Chair
Benedetto opened up discussion among the IDC members relative to the three options.
Van Allen asked: Who defines the agreement and the charge and mission of the IDC under
Option II? How much support does the IDC get? The IDC gets the negotiation power and
staff expects to attend and support the IDC. Schwientek suggested athree-year perpetuating,
one-page agreement to be reviewed periodically at the IDC annual meeting. Olson asked if the
current IDC mission statement fits? Will the agreement work with the Council and EDA?
Perhaps the word: "advisory" should be added to the charge of the IDC. In response to the
question, if the Comp Plan would be referenced in the agreement; Attorney Jamnik stated it
could show a link between the organization and its recognition of the Comp Plan. Benedetto
noted the charge of the IDC as an "advisory board."
The committee continued to look at the legal points for negotiation. Appointment of committee
members by the Council formalizes or legitimizes governing of the board in such cases of
misbehavior which is rare stated Attorney Jamnik. Indemnification of IDC members under
Option II is consistent with the appointment by Council of other commission members.
Members of the IDC should not be restricted to residency of the City and it was suggested the
IDC nominate its members. Open meeting law: Regular meetings are open to the public. With
the greater number of IDC members, the likelihood of a quorum and anon-noticed meeting is
highly unlikely. Special meetings must be noticed three working days prior to the meeting date.
IDC records become public or open documents. Posting of IDC minutes and membership on
the city web site are negotiable items. If the IDC is not interested in compliance of the open
meeting law then Option III is more likely noted Jamnik.
•
2
IDC Minutes - 01/08/08
DON ROBERTS MADE A MOTION OF NO INTEREST OR TO ELIMINATE THE
STRUCTURE IDENTIFIED IN OPTION I: THE IDC TO SERVE UNDER THE EDA.
BILL TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION AND WITH NO FURTHER DISCUSSION,
THE MOTION CARRIED.
BILL TAPPER MADE A MOTION OF NO INTEREST OR TO ELIMINATE T'HE
STRUCTURE IDENTIFIED IN OPTION III: THE IDC TO OPERATE
INDEPENDENTLY AS A PUBLIC ACTION GROUP. BARB SCHWIENTEK
SECONDED THE MOTION stating the IDC would die without the support of C111ie and the
Council. She was not in favor offend-raising and felt indemnification was important. Although
Don Robert agreed with Schwientek's points, he felt based on his experience that separate
committees, independent and supported by cities, and self-funded were far more effective and
suggested the IDC explore formation as an independent group. Dick Van Allen agreed with
Roberts noting the importance of the IDC to voice (lobby) an opinion as an advocate for the
industrial businesses and developers. Koropchak noted organizational structures like the St.
Cloud Economic Development Partnership, Wright County Partnership and others who through
membership dues advocate for business retention and expansion, lobby legislators, and
promote industrial development efforts. Van Allen noted the pro-business climate in Big Lake
with astream-line and aggressive approach to economic development. Schwientek noted the
support of the community in the recent development of the new clinic in Big Lake and the
willingness of the city to use tax abatement. WITH NO FURTHER DISCUSSION, THE
MOTION CARRIED. VOTE 6-2. ROBERTS AND VAN ALLEN OPPOSED.
BILL TAPPER MADE A MOTION CREATING A SUBCOMMITTEE OF BENEDETTO,
DAHL-FLEMING, ROBERTS, AND VAN ALLEN ALONG WITH KOROPCHAK TO
DRAFT AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE IDC AND CITY BASED ON DISCUSSION
AND SUPPORT FOR OPTION II: THE IDC TO OPERATE AS A SEPARATE GROUP
(SIMILAR AS TODAY). DICK VAN ALLEN SECONDED THE MOTION AND WITH
NO FURTHER DISCUSSION, THE MOTION CARRIED. Attorney Jamnik stated he
would draft a form as a resolution for the subcommittee. The subcommittee scheduled an
independent meeting for Tuesday, January 15, at 8:00 a.m. The goal for IDC approval
February 5 and the Council approval February 11, 2008.
4. New Business:
A. Update on the pro~xess to upgrade the electrical substation at Lake Pulaski near
Buffalo which serves Oakwood Industrial Park/Monticello Commerce Center.
(Rescheduled for February meeting.)
B. Presentation of 2007 IDC membersh~ and terms -discuss re-appointments of three-
year term. Koropchak noted the three-year term of Benedetto, Roberts, Dahl-
Fleming, and Gutzwiller expired December 2007. All four members agreed to serve
another three-year term. Chair Benedetto read a letter of resignation from Mary
Barger. Given Mary's resignation, Koropchak noted three positions in the area of
3
IDC Minutes - 01/08/08
manufacturer, health care, and service are open. Koropchak informed members of a
call from the hospital and the interest by the new hospital administrator. Since the IDC
represents industry and manufacturers, the members encouraged recruitment of an
industrial leader and stressed the importance of the 75% attendance requirement.
Koropchak was directed to proceed in recruitment of a hospital representative and
others for possible IDC membership.
5. Reports:
A. Economic Development Report.
In addition to the written report, Koropchak informed members of the upcoming Comp
Plan Update Open House, on Wednesday, January 30, 5-8:00 p.m. in the Mississippi
Room. Also, the EDA and City Council are holding a joint workshop on TIF 101 and
Development/Purchase Contracts on Wednesday, January 16.
6. Review the draft copy of the January 2 2008 Planning Commission Agenda for industrial
related items. Discuss and vote on an IDC position or action if necessary. (Not ap lip .cable.
due to IDC change of meeting_date.l
The Planning Commission meeting cycle was held prior to the IDC meeting for the month of
January.
7. Other Business.
A. Next IDC meeting - Tuesday February 5 2008
Benedetto and Schwientek noted they would not be present at the February meeting.
B. Other business.
None.
8. Adjournment.
The IDC meeting adjourned at 8:30 a.m. by a consensus of its membership.
Ollie Koropchak, Recorder
•
4
3~.
PROPOSED OPTIONS
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
FOR THE MONTICELLO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE (IDC)
December 4, 2007
OPTION I
•
STRUCTURE -the IDC to serve as a citizens volunteer group under the reconstituted seven-member
City of Monticello Economic Development Authority (EDA).
ROLE -the IDC would carry out the efforts of the EDA and promote policies and strategies for
economic development.
STRENGTHS
WEAKNESSES
Council representation.
Staff support.
Perhaps reduction in number of meetings.
No agreement necessary
Indemnification
Recognized as a governing body of the city.
More effective via uniformity
IDC QUESTIONS.
Subject to open meeting law.
Reduced or filtered voice of the industrial
business community.
Loss of independence.
Membership appointed by Council, not IDC.
Another layer of government.
1. What is the new role of the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority?
To be defined by the EDA commissioners.
•
1
OPTION II
STRUCTURE -the IDC operates as a separate group (similar as today) except there is an agreement
between the City and the IDC.
ROLE - an agreement between the City and IDC outlines the charge or mission of the IDC and how
the IDC supports the City Council and the City Council supports the IDC.
STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES
Staff support. Degree of independence subject to Agreement.
More independent than Option I (Needs further explanation at meeting.)
Formalizes relationship between IDC
and City.
Foundation and basis for staff and city
expenditures.
IDC OUESTIONS OF DECEMBER 4, 2007.
1. Is the agreement a position statement approved annually by the City Council and the IDC?
2. Will the agreement include or reference the Monticello Comp Plan?
3. What is the proposed context and conditions of the agreement? What does the agreement say?
4. What is the process to move forward with an agreement?
5. Are the IDC members still volunteers or are the members appointed by the City Council?
6. Is the IDC subject to the open meeting law?
7. Is there Council representation?
QUESTIONS ONE THROUGH SEVEN: WHAT WOULD THE IDC LIKE OR WANT? To
discuss at January 8"' meeting.
• ,
•
OPTION III
STRUCTURE -the IDC operates independently as a public action group.
ROLE -Consistent with IDC Mission Statement: To increase the industrial tax base, to create jobs at
liveable wage-levels, and to maintain a favorable and desirable industrial environment i,n the City of
Monticello.
STRENGTHS
Retains full independence.
Ability to lobby.
Voice for the industrial business community
IDC appoints its members.
Not subject to open meeting law.
WEAKNESSES
No staff support.
No city funding.
Optional council representation.
No indemnification.
•
IDC Agenda - 02,05/08
3A. Review the IDC subcommittee recommendation and approve a motion re~Iuesting the
City Council at their February 11 2008 meeting consider adoption of the resolution
recognizing the Industrial Development Committee
A. Reference and background•
At the IDC meeting of January 8, the members authorized a subcommittee consisting of
Benedetto, Van Allen, Roberts, and Dahl-Fleming along with Koropchak to draft an agreement
between the IDC and the City based on the January 8~' discussions and support for Option II:
The IDC to operate as a separate group (similar as today).
The subcommittee met for a brief time following the regular meeting of January 8~'. Attorney
Jamnik stated at the IDC meeting that he would draft a resolution form for the subcommittee.
Upon Koropchak receiving the draft form from Jamnik, the subcommittee met on January 15.
Taking into account the comments by members of the IDC and the IDC Organizational and
Membership Guidelines, the subcommittee completed the resolution. The completed resolution
as prepared by the subcommittee was forwarded to Attorney Jamnik and Admiiustrator
O'Neill for comments~nly Attorney Jamnik responded: Looked fine to him..
~ Therefore, the subcommittee submits to the IDC the resolution for review and recommends the
IDC approve a motion reauestin the Citv Council at their February 11 2008 meeting consider
adoption of the resolution reco izin~ the Industrial Development Committee
B. Supporting Data•
Copy of resolution for review.
~~.~ ~, ~~ apt ~
•
~ ~~
• IDC SUBCOMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COM~VIITTEE
WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized to create advisory boards for the City as
deemed necessary for the proper management and operation of the City by Minnesota
Statutes Section 412.111, and;
WHEREAS, in 1982 an Industrial Development Committee was formed to operate as
an independent organization serving as an advocate to influence and assist industrial
development in and for the City of Monticello, and;
WHEREAS, the mission of the IDC has been and remains to increase the industrial tax
base, to create jobs at liveable wage-levels, and to maintain a favorable and desirable
industrial environment in the City of Monticello, and;
WHEREAS, the City Council and the Industrial Development Committee have
determined it mutually beneficial to more formally recognize the IDC's importance and
role in promoting and maintaining industrial development and j ob creation within the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Monticello:
1. The existence and continuation of the IDC is hereby recognized by the City
Council.
2. The IDC as an independent organization shall make recommendations, advise,
and assist the City Council, the Economic Development Authority, and other
City boards and commissions on matters relating to industrial development
and j ob creation and retention.
•
•
3. The IDC shall select and confirm all committee members by a majority of
vote of its membership for rP~nmmen ar;~„ to the City Council for Council
appointment.
4. The City Council shall appoint the Mayor and a Council Member to, t~l ADC
as non-voting members and shall a~~m_~~~nnnmic Development ~ (~o=~~ ~~~~'
_ ~"ccicf~
Director as the Executive Director of the IDC as anon-voting member. _ ~-
5. The IDC shall hold regular meetings the first Tuesday of each month at 7. 0
a.m. in the Monticello Community Center. Special meetings maybe cane
by the Chairperson and Executive Director.
6. The IDC committee size, make-up of the committee, officers, length of
membership term, and attendance shall be governed in accordance with the
Monticello Industrial Committee Organizational and Membership
Guidelines. CG~Js~~ w~C~:.~.« t /tPpG..~n d~f ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ,y~ °~
•
ADOPTED this day of February, 2008, by the City Council of the Cit;~ of
Monticello.
Clint Herbst, Mayor
ATTEST:
Dawn Grossinger, Deputy City Clerk
,~,
/' ~`
{~i%' r
~~
~ ~ ~lc-
a ti
~ ~~ ° ~~~c
n~j~ ~~
~ ~,~ ~' ~r+r ~, ~ ~ VVV~~~
v ~` ;~ 5
2
IDC Agenda - 02/05/08
C. Re ort of the Executive Director.
5 p
a) Semi-annual TIF payments have been determined for issuance of checks to developers.
These payments were approved by the previous commissioners in accordance to the terms and
conditions of each Contract. The amount of the semi-annual (Feb 1 and August 1 on each
year) payment is determined based on the amount of tax increment per district paid to the EDA
by the County and via the terms and conditions of each Contract. A copy of the; checks will
be included in the February 13 EDA agenda for informational purposes.
b) Business Subsidy Reports to the State are due April 1, 2008.
c) I attended the Economic Development Association of Minnesota (EDAM) Conference
January 17/18. The sessions I attended were as follows: 1) Best Economic Development
Marketing Campaign (City of Faribault). 2) Sustainable Development: LEED and GreenStar
Programs. 3) Alternative Energy: Elk River -Energy City. 4) Alterative Energy: Legislative
Update. 5) Developing your Successful Business Retention and Expansion (BR.&E) 6) Best
Economic Development Initiative. Keynote lunch speakers: Dan McElroy, Connmissioner of
DEED. Elwyn Tinklenberg, Tinklenberg Group, talked about transportation and transit
programing and funding. Conference provides fresh ideas to consider in economic
development planning and allows for networking.
d) Next regular meeting of the EDA is Wednesday, February 13, 2008. The EDA will start to
review policies and guidelines for possible amendment and general information..
e) Met with Marshall Smith, new Hospital Administrator, on January 23. Met with Kraig
Gunwall and Rhonda Romines, Business Bankers, Wells Fargo, on January 25. Scheduled to
meet with Wayne Elam, Allied Properties/Terra General Contractors, on February 1, and Rich
Harris, Midwest Precision Machining, on January 31.
f) Walker In-Store has moved into their new facility on Dalton Court. I talked with Brian the
other day about the EDA administrative cost shortfall of which the EDA will fi~rther discuss.
Brian accepted my invitation to host a community open house once they are settled.
g) The Continuing Education group is scheduled to meet February 8~' with gue:;t presenter
Doug Parr, Riverland Community College, Owatonna.
h) The Marketing Committee revised the ad for the County Partnership directory as well as the
community pages were updated. Given the January MN Real Estate Journal was marketed as
highlights of Sherburne and Wright County, the committee placed an ad. Upori receiving the
Journal, Wright County was not featured and Monticello mentioned once. Working with the ad
agent, the committee was given an option of an additional free ad or a 500-word featured
article. The committee opted for the 500-word article. Attached article on EII: River. Also
featured Big Lake.
i) LEADS: 150,000 sq ft data center -Midwest state search. Due to the proxirriity of the
power plant from business park, Monticello was eliminated.
-15,000 sq ft -Out of state firm looking to build a 15,000 sq ft Lab within one-mile of
•
IDC Agenda - 02/05/08
MNRoad. $5-10 million investment. 10-15 en 'neer technicians.
- 5,000 sq ft heated and 3,000 sq ft unheated space. Purchase or lease. Low-tech, wood
manufacturer.
UMC -Congratulations for being named Outstanding High Economic Vitality Business of the
Year at the annual meeting of the Wright County Economic Development Partnership.
j) Fiber Optics -The committee of Mayer, Simola, Westby, and Shuman interviewed
engineering firms on January 29. Frequency rate testing for location of equipment building
conducted February 5. Bond documents moving forward. SEE ATTACHED ARTICLE.
k) Information attached -Comparative summary of masonry construction versus pre-
engineered metal buildings prepared for Simola by Bolton & Menk, Inc.
1) The next IDC meeting will be the annual meeting and election of officers - It is time for the
IDC to establish its 2008 goals and work plan. One of the items I suggest for the IDC consider
spearheading is the BRE Approach through the University of Minnesota Extension Service.
This is the group Big Lake used. See attached information provided at the EDAM conference.
m) Bob Viering, Member of the EDA and Chamber Gov't Affairs -I've asked him to check
and keep tabs on the SEED program scheduled to be induced to the Legislators. Question is
whether Wright County included or not included?
n) Cedar Street Garden Center purchased by the EDA for future redevelopment should be
demolished in February. Bids have been awarded by the EDA and Council.
•
•
•
•
c->
a'~
a
c
0
a
0
u.,
0
N
d
C
O
O
N
a
c
0
N ~
,~ ~ bA ~
~ ~ ~ w O ' ' ~ •~
by p •~ O ~ •~ "C7 >, ' ~ ~: ~, ai
:~ O •'" y
~ ~ ~ O ' bq N ~
O O m ~ p w N by ~
~ C s
~/~ ,a
~~~ ~ STS o o ~~'~ ° U •~ ~ o,~...~ ~ ~
~ ~~ ~•~ ~ ~ ~~~
. .
'~ ;o y ,
~" 3
~ o
~
O ~ a
~ .~ ~ ,~ ~ ~
w, •~ ~
. j v ~ ~ ~
, y bn ~ ~ c~ J,
c
c ~
" a~ s
~o ~b ~. -o~Qa~~ .~~~~ ~o
0 0 ~
o
~ o °
'b ~
~ o ~ ~ ~, ~
.-
,
~ ~ ib
~ ,r o:~ ~~~,a4 ~?~ ~
~
H
a
t
C
O
.~
H~
y
L
W
~; .,
o ~ ~ ~ p <u
~ '~ o ~ ~ ~ ~
,
~ ~ ~ ~
~ 3 ~.~ v ~ ~ ~'n ~
~ o
~
Z ~ ~° °
'O .~ ~ o .
~.
O ° o ~
~ ,
a~
°
o
~ ...
y ~ N O
~ •
~:.
N ~ ~
~
~b
.
, ~ O
Y
~ ,
_
.
~, O
~ ~ ~
~ :ca~
o-
°- ~
~ .~
~
~ a~ a f~3
r~ ~, ~ ~
~4:
bn o ~, o bA ~ ~
~ Q ,~ ,
~ r~i] ~ ~ °~i CC Lr U ~ C., .y ~
~ w
a ~ `
a bin ° •^ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ° ~
,~ o ~'
o ~ '33
° ' ~~°a
° ~
bn x u.~ ~
c
0
Q ~ ~ 'y CCS ~ ~ CCS 0 '~ ..~: i
ai
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •Q ~ Q ~ ~ •.-i .
10
d
> ~
-o ~
a +-• O c~
~~o ~ U v~
a~ ~
o ~, ~, 3
~ o ~•~ ~~ d
W ~ ,~ .L ~"+ ~ ^~ ~ ~ •r .C
~ ~
q ~
~~ p :t2 4•-i
O ya U ~
° w U d
i
O '
~ p 3 W O ~^ o~ a
y ~ N ~ '~ ~ O _ '.•~ _
~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ '~
° ~ ap fL ~ ~ ~ ;a v
`o ~ w °'~' o
o
' ~ ~ ~ '
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
d
i- ~ o ~ bn :a E~ ~
~ ,
~ ~ ~ D
'C }
C ~
a d
2
~ ~
ac
H
'C
~ L
m
~ w a~ .
o ~p3 ,~~3,~ ~ 3~ o~ ~~~ ~~•o~
~' o o ~
C].. `a ~ O ~n '~ ~ ~ ~n G) w a3 .~ U ~ C~j ~ ~ ~ ~bA
~ 0 3 ~ ~ ~ ~.
U > as ~ ~ i..; ~ C E'" ~ C y r~ ~ O y ~ by ~ ~~ N ~ ~ • bu N
.,
o ~=
y ~ 3 :j c~ N r. ~ ~ G CL 'b ^- ;~ 3 =' C Q. ~C p '"-' ~ ~ G) ~ `ck," ~ . G ~ w ~ U N . ~ . ~ ~ 'b
U U ,~ ~ O~ ..^.. w :C d ..C O r cC YG ' ~ s.. 'd ?> C ~ ~ 'v~ O p .~ ~ N • ^~ ~ ~
C ~ U ~ •:: ~ r, ~ ~ .' ~ O v. ~ '~ w cs 3 3 ~ p O ~ •~, ~ •~ O '_' ~ C, b4 Y .~ X •.U.
, G- p ~ N . ~ ~' N '" ~ O 'O ~ N bQ ~~ v~ ~ ~ .O U ~ O O ,~ ~' cG ~, ~ Ow'~ v~ ~, ~ U U
~ p ar bin ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ c :~ °: = ~ ro ~ ~ ,~ -~ !~. a ~ ~ ~ ~ ° .a ~ ° , o y v ~~ o . ~
,~ .~~ o~;~~~•rr,U ago 3~~c,~°. ~~~~..c° 3~~; ~.~-~~,=,~~ ~
!~ ~F" ° r v'U ~ ~_ ~' J` °'~ o~v~ ~ °'- o.~ a.~ o,~ ~ c.~ a.H ,>~ oV ~ o ~v~'~, ~ ~.y o
~ T7 ~ 'O ~ r G N 'p `~ N ~ '~ cG N ^ ~ `~ N ~ ~ G~ s.: s~-'i ~ ~ +~' ~ ~ ~ 'CS ~ ~ '^' " c~
~ ~ T.` ~ ~ O ~ x U N d ~ > O >' .~
D ~ N ~ CYi `~ C ..-. ,, r ~ O ~ ;.r ~ - vi 'b ~ >, '+" ,.~ `~ ,SU., U i'-' ~ E'a ,>~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~., .y., 4?
S~ .o O ~ ~' ~ . -" U N O `~ ~ ~ 4 j c~ v~ +-' . Q' +-' N O cU N .-. cC O ~ a~ ~ ~ -_C ~
~ ~ ~,, ~ ~ n c >, ,'.+~ U ~ N `'' "' ~ O, O '~ ~ ~ bA . ~ U ~ ~ ~ `+-, ~ 3 Q? > U . ~ «r", .a ~ O bq ~" 3 ~~."
_~ ~ G ~ ~ a~ = ~; r' '~ r r v ~ `~-~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O a; O ' ~ r c~ O ~' .~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ w O ~ ~ °~
:J
r,
m O O O ~ N ~ ~ -v ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ^.~~ ' ~ ~ U ~ ~ b,J N ~ ~ O .~ bq ~ O C%~ N r > 3 N ~ cb ^~ O N
c3 w
y b71 U ~ _ ~, `. ~ N G ~ 'C7 .~ • ~ N p c~C ~ O G .~ N p U ~ ~ ' C' ~i v U 'O ~ U
b~J) N U b J ~ . ~ ^ 1 , di .O C' C',1 U c~G O , U ,~ ~" c~^~' w ~ C ~ O ~ ~ O 3 ~ ..~ ~ U Q.. cC O ~ bU .~ ~ ~ ~ O
~ v> >, U . ~ a~ P~ 5 p O C U ~ O-' U 3 Q'' ~ ~ C~ .k ~' ~ d? a4 ~ ,~ ~ [-i cC ..d ~ U
_ r U ~ O c~ ~, O cc1
d ~ cC ~ U y ~ N ~ y '_- ~ ~ .~ ~ '^-' 't3 u ' ~ N ~ ~ O ~ O ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~r vUi .~ O. 0 ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ w ~ ~
°~-ti~ oo ~ ~ ~ ~•~? v ~.~ orn o o ~ bnQ o~ ~~-~ >,~ O o~ ~ o,owo ~ ~ 3 ~~ o ~: 3~"
O. ccz V C/] . ~ U 'G :. ~ ~ n bq ~ v; U ,.~ O ~ ~ w cd cC p., .: w 'C3 Clr ~ 3 .D '~ ..C
._, ~ ~ ~ ~_ bl, ~,
J ~ f
~~'^ N ~O U
's ~ y ,~ a~ ~ ° r
~ _ v
R ~ ~ U N W „O
"~ U, ': ~ O
~ ~-- ~., O .~ 5
~~' U p ,~ . ~ N O ~
sue. '~ ~ U .D C ''' O~
~. ~ ,~
d cC p U , = .~ a>
r V ~ ~
v >, O U
:C U N
'"' U ~
s°s •~ bra ~ . ~ a ~ a^
~ ~ as ~' o bn ~. r ~, ~
l~~b ~ ~ ~ ^ U•~
U O a3 ~ bf) 3
~ i U ice.. ~~' U r.~ ~ ~-.
° O ~ .~
cG O U p ~ +-
'-~ O
~ r ~ .fl . ~' 3 ~. ~,
w ~' ~ ~' ° Y ° ° Q'
~~
[GGA .~ y j ... • r., ~ j y
~~ . b1J ~_ ~ ,-~. ~ Y ~ O
,~ ~, "" cG _r„
~ bil ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~~r
'-' ~ ~ p, ,~ v' ~ v U O U U ~ U vUi Q O bA J ~ ~
;-i U a' C
O cd ~ "~U' O v G7 p OU ~.' Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ' ab., ~ ~ (%~ ~ a~~ ' F~ • U ~ ~ ~
e~
U s., .S/ O G1, ,~ > U ~ U ~ ~ cn .~, U ~
t-: U ~ O N > '~ ~ bA C1. U U `n "~ cG O W U '~ U Q ~ A ~ ,~
it ~+
> O o a~~ ~•~.~ ° ~ ~'~.~~° °~ ~•° o aria ~~ ~ ~
U
W ~ ~ ~ ...
i b~r~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ y ~ ~ Q. • ~ ~ i~ Z G. ~ ~ sues~, v ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~
•in b1J bA +~ .~ ..~ O U ~ U O O U O ~ v~ ~ N .U~ N cC 3 NN
~ ' a7 p„ >, ~ ~ ;~ • ,, ti Z O Y ~ C N U cd U ~+ ~ s., ~ ~ O N
bra ~ b,1 Q., .., v~ ~ ~. ~ . ~ .~ d ~ ~ o o ~ .~ ~ 3 ~
Q~C
~Q .
2
~~~
Excerpts from a new report to the Portland (Oregon) mayor and city council,
describing why a Community Fiber Network is vital
conomic Development: Eco- jn the Commi3slOn's V15ian, Portland's economy is made. Up
nomic develo meet Tanners here
e
large) y of small businesses and
these businesses need a robust
envision attracting
and elsewher
new businesses to the Cizy by offering and stable communication infrastructure in order to grow.
state-of--the-art communications infra-
structure. Very' high 'bandwidth is in- a game
menrindustry. To be viable
velo testified before the U~ Senate that there
creasingly a key criterion for companies ,
p
or piece ofsoftware has t~ be tested on- exists "room for continued involvement
deciding where to locate new offices and line and adjusted based on data gathered and use of telemedicine throughout In-
other. facilities. from the tests - it can take thousands of dian Country. Telemedici n~ is a p~~~~-er-
Fiber ,could draw software compa- :high-bandwidth transfers for such. tests ful means ;;f delivering a,n~ultanon and
Hies, video production houses, and corn- - _ and-.this bandwidth is essential:if the education to the front lines front cenrers
panies that need. access. to their satellite developer is ro a~mpete -with ether ap- of expertise."
facilities across the US and the world. in plicuions in de~~clopment. Sustainable Development: 11t~
the national and globalcompeti~ion for Education: Fiber enables hererofnrc- Portland-Multnomah County Sustain-
businesses,fiberwouldaddincomplrshle ttnrhinkable means of educating and able llevel~~pment Commission sa}-s
bandwidth to the City's .existing atn~ac" inspiringstudents. Not only could the F"1,TP allows citizens. to use a_robusc,
buns that make it a famously artractirc Community Fiber\etworkgivestudents satble, high-eapacitj-,electrynic-cntnmu-
place to work and ~Iive.~ Fiber could also
enable redcaclopmenr or res italization of ,end parents access ro high-bandwidth
schoi>I resources and lcarninfi tools, bur nications channel co conduct_busiiless -
improv-
tcducin~; vehidc miles rra«led
;inas andattractand rrtain ~sr~rkers. it can also give there access to dynamic ,
ing air duahtti acid rcducnig greenhouse
Small -and High>Tech Business: ]earning tools from around. the. si~orld. gas ernissions. Ic promotes telccomntut-
Fiber ss~ould benefit one of the Portland unhindered by distance or capacity: ing hti~ enabling; Small- to medium-sized
area's most innovative new businesses. Creative .educational tools can levrr- businesses to efficientlti~partjeipate iii the
~:ersis Online is a small; entrepreneurial, age the bower of fiber bandwidth., For global.niarketplace throw h us~~:ofvideo-
focallirm that sine 2006 has operated example, -the emer;~ing "I3rainstormcr" confereneingand elee~rontctIla~iiansfers.
~'ersis Videogame Center, s~'hich oflersa ~rarniug program uses the,tnotifs, acs- FoF indiv-idtial citizens, it~rt»~riea
Welt-generation, innovative gaming ex- thctics, aRd attractions i~t video ganiirtg c]ecrronic access as way to avoid drix~ln~
pcricncx.Ilu Center offers video dame to expose young people and other users ({or instance, usii~~ online b~in:,~ing> us-
consoles,high-deti»irionTVs.cumfort-
' toe"[;ame"dedicatcdtnsharingofideas ~ingthelnternettotikeaClassor~elecom-_
Ihe company has
able chairs; andfi>od. o~~er high-h~nditi~idtli ~onnections.Braitl- mutino to tivotkl. Finallt~, a r~bii,st con-
a goal of raising ~2 million to finance stormer's potential is lunite~j onh~bv the 111unicationsinfrastrucuirewviildrrd'use
iiess' stores in 2008. bandu idthover which its users ultcract, .the use of paper by allc~scing:.peuple to
Portland'Gonununity Fiber connec-
~ I?~blie:~d~~1th:.In April _'O0~; Sa-
transferlargeiiara filzs m•er thelhternet.
to the Internet:.
bons from ~'ersis stores creel pleart `1ledical Ce~iter- in Eugehe'
~ In he Sustainable De~~elopment
openupthe possibility- of art inre~rna- a te]e-
...initiated a: pilot project to creatc Commission's vision', Portland's ec~ri-"
tiunal gaming .experience over a^ al` ~ medicine little between its .pediatric dc- omw ismade up Iargel}' of small bust
fordable, robust, andstahle conueetiou. pertinent andspetialistsatDoernbecher nessesandrhesebusiiiessesneeda~obusr
~IIigh-speed,nigh-capacit}' connections- Children'sl~ospit3linPurtland,Thegoal and sra~.~~„~coiiimurti~~iuon.ittlteslruc--
Iidug out-ot-the-area *amers, including of the projecristo reduce he number tuie in~ord~rto grow;FTTP~vtll assist
international players, into the centers of children°~ransfeired ro Doernhecher these businesses to remain sustainti6le,
withoutlost connections and other dis-
~ Pediatricians at Sacred Heart will con- profitable and support them,in their
fio crimmonh~associ-
rupttonsin scniGe
~ .duct video consu]tations with pedian~ic abilin-ti3 prod-ide johsand conrnbure o
a 1o~ser-speedcunnectinn. ~
ated wich i~iternists ac -L~oernbecher to determine .the livab
ilit~~ of our city. ~SBP
Indced,~~ communirv fiber could if a child needs to lie transferred w its .
dramaricalh~ groin Portland's -fledgling pediairicintcnsieecare unit; l'ouran~s~ad tbe'ti~ll t~f~ort icliic{~
digitaltriedia/~amii~?~ industr-y, ~rhich Cc,rnmunit~'Tilicr can also.connccr zua; iuri;t~ti bi Po~'l~l~ul c Df~%re:ot~CaEilr
is already strongly established in San rural areas to Portland medie~l facilities Cn~rrnianicatinirs,Ynd Fr~x~i~hi~elilan,zg~-
Francisco-ant{ Seattle. Fiber could also in another practical use ol~telemedicine, fnenz, at htt~://u u~to.~tiorthtndorzltxe,tr~nt/
henehr the larger Portland softst~arctie- ~e Dii~eetor oEOne Sky Ccnrer recently .~~~ur~~dit~in,4m,ag~.~fn~i%rtf=1 ~~2f~
1.4 I BROADBAND PROPERTIES I www.broadbandpropertles.com I DECEh1EEP . J
BOLTON ~ M ~ N K , I NC_
Consulting Engineers & Surveyors
7533 Sunwood Drive NW • Suite 206 • Ramsey, MN 55303
Phone (763) 433-2851
January 22, 2008
City of Monticello
Attn: John Simola
505 Walnut Street, Suite #1
Monticello, MN 55362
1ZE: Vehicle Storage Building
City Project Number 2007-19C
Monticello, MN
Mr. John Simola:
On January 15, 2008 bids were opened and. read publically for the Wastewater Treatment Facility Vehicle
Storage Building, with a base bid of a masonry building and an alternative for apre-engineered metal
building. General contractors were able to bid the base bid, the alternative or both. '?'wenty-two general
contractors provided bids ranging from $245,922.00 to $546,453.85. The engineer's estimate on the
masonry building is $405,000.00.
W. Gohman, the apparent low bidder on the alternative metal building with a bid of $245,922.00,
withdrew their bid on the morning of January 16, 2008 due to an error on their internal bid tabulation.
The withdrawal is allowed within 24 hours of the bid opening and W. Gohman met the requirements to
withdraw their bid.
KUE Contractors from Watkins, MN is the remaining apparent low bidder for both the masonry base bid
at $328,674.00 and the metal building alternate bid at $260,647.00. KUE Contractors has recently
completed similar projects for the City of Big Lake, the City of Otsego, Mill Lacs County, Kandiyohi
County and Wright County ranging from approximately $500,000 to approximately $4,000,000. KUE
Contractors appears to be qualif ed and responsive to the proposal and I recommend award of the contract
to them.
City staff requested a life cycle analysis of the two building types for an accurate comparison. The
following assumptions were made in conducting the life cycle analysis:
I . Design Life a masonry is 40~t ,80 years: 6~ears selected for analysis
2. Design Life ofpre-engineered metal building (without major repair) 15 to 25 years: 20 years
selected for analysis.
3. Masonry building will require re-roofing every 20 years. Present Value Cost of $30,000.
4. Major repair of the metal building will require removal and replacement of sheet metal and
structural steel. The structural steel will have a salvage value at the time of demolition. Present
.Value of Replace minus Salvage Value of $90,000.
5. Plumbing, HVAC and electrical will have similar operation, maintenance and replacement cost
and are omitted from the rest of the analysis.
C:Wocument~pgq~a.BOA(IICI~clgt{t~te~XQ8Qi1{l~rL~C?~/IN CFiASKA, MN
WILLMAR, MN • RAMSEY, MN • AMES, IA
www.bolton-menk.com
An Equal Opportunity Employer
•
•
BO ETON ~. M ~ N K , 1 NC_
Mr. John Simola
January 22, 2008
Page 2 of 2
Summary
Over a life of 60 years the masonry building costs $129.56 per square foot and the metal building costs
$146.88 per square foot. Over a life of 20 years the masonry building costs $109.56 per square foot and
the meta building costs $86.88 per square foot. The two construction types have different goals and
design lives. The durability of the masonry construction results in a more economical building over the
full design life of that type of construction. A metal building is successful in a shorter term (20 years)
due to the reduced capital costs at initial construction. Analysis of a 40-year term using the same
assumptions described above results in the building types being essentially the same cost at per square
foot.
Building Type Cost Per S uare Foot
20-Year Desi n Life 40-Year Desi n Life 60-Year Desi n Life
Mason Construction $109.56 $119.56 $129.56
Pre-en ineered Metal $86.88 $116.88 $146.88
All Dollar Values are in 2008 Present Worth Amounts
Best Regards,
Paul Saffert, P.E.
Project Engineer
l~
C:\Documents and Settings\paulsa.BOLTON-MENK\My DocumentsUvlonticello\0801176uildingLtr.doc
~. UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA EXTENSION SERVICE
•O
0~
N
C'i
. H
V
~~
q
bo
t`i
. H
Community Leaders
Business Retention and Expansion (BR&E)
Strategies Program
A community consensus approach
to encourage the growth of local businesses
Why Business Retention and Expansion?
A healthy and vibrant local economy depends on the well-being of a community's existing firms.
Thus, efforts aimed at helping local businesses survive and grow in the local community are key
to successful economic development. The community benefits because:
• Forty to eighty percent of all new jobs are created by existing firms
• Businesses that stay competitive are more likely to remain in the community and possibly
expand
• Keeping an existing business is often easier than recruiting a new firm
• Firms considering moving will talk to existing firms. Odds are better of attracting new firms
if existing ones are happy with the community.
Benefits of the Community Leader's approach to BR&E:
Economic development efforts often require action from many community players. Without
community consensus, economic development stalls. Our program is a proven community
involvement approach for building the consensus to move forward. The University of Minnesota
Extension Service provides technical assistance, training and research to help communities
assess business concerns, understand the structure of the local economy, set priorities, and
implement projects that will help make communities more vibrant.
BRE Objectives:
Short Term
• Demonstrate community support for local firms
• Help solve immediate business concerns
Long Term
• Build community capacity to sustain business growth and development through creation of a
broad-based coalition
• Increase the competitiveness of local firms
• Establish and implement a strategic plan for economic development
The University of F.4mnesWa is an equal opportunity educator and empinyer.
UNIYERSLTY OE A'IINNESOTA
Extension
11-27-2007, 1
~1v
H
4.~
l`~~
.N
N
V
U NIYERSITY OF MINNESOTA EXTENSION SERVICE
Who is involved in a BR&E Strategies Program?
The Leadership Team introduces and promotes the program in the community, coordinates task
force meetings, and organizes immediate follow-up.
The Task Force is a broad-based group of local leaders, including representatives of economic
development organizations, chambers of commerce, business, government, and educational
institutions.
Business Visitors are leaders from the task force and community. Each team has two members
and visits two to four businesses.
Steps to Business Retention
Firm Visits
• Community leaders are trained to conduct firm visits
• Using a proven survey, community leaders interview businesses about their needs, concerns
and plans
Red Flag Follow-Up
• Task Force reviews surveys and responds to firms' immediate needs including linking firms
to appropriate economic development programs and services
Strategic Planning
• Survey results are analyzed and documented in a written report
• A campus research review panel of University faculty and other economic development
experts offer suggested projects to address business needs identified in the survey
• The Task Force uses the report and its knowledge of the community to develop a strategic
action plan
q
ao
• H
Implementation
• Local teams carry out projects identified in the strategic plan
Types of BR&E programs:
Previous programs have addressed manufacturing, mixed sector businesses, agriculture and
tourism. Programs have been completed in rural, urban and suburban areas throughout
Minnesota including parts of cities, groups of cities, counties and regions.
Services available within Minnesota (prices effective 8/30/07, subject to change without
notice)
1) Materials:
a) Web-site containing sample surveys, reports from BR&E programs, success stories,
research on BR&E, etc. at www.bre.umn.edu . Free
b) BR&E DVD which includes Sibley County (Minnesota) Case Study and Tips for
Successful BR&E Firm Visits. $35 plus postage and handling at
http://shop.extension.umn.edu/PublicationDetail.aspx?1 D=1827
The University of Minnesota is an equal oppodunity educator and employer.
UNIVERSITY OF NIINNESQTA
Extension
~ :.
11-27-2007, 2
o~
N
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA EXTENSION SERVICE
2) Educational Courses for Economic Developers: See www.bre.umn.edu or contact Michael
Darger
a) BR&E Consultant Certification to facilitate this community-based BR~i.E approach.
(online course for $550)
b) BR&E Research Reports to compile surveys into a community strategic action plan
(online for $345)
3) Workshops taught in your community: Contact your Regional Extension Educator:
a) Assessment workshop -- Is a BR&E Program Right for our Community? $100 or free at
the office of your Regional Extension Educator
b) Starting a BR&E Visitation Program (leadership team only) $500
c) BR&E Visitor Training $500
d) Setting Priorities and Taking Action (planning retreat) $500
4) Research Services (prices vary on length and complexity of survey): Contact Michael
Darger
a) Custom survey instrument $2,000-4,000
b) Data tabulation and analysis, $2,000-4,000 (only available with survey provided by
U of M BR&E)
c) Complete Research Package, $8,500* (includes survey instrument, data
tabulation/analysis, campus research review meeting involving University faculty to
develop suggested projects to meet business concerns, four-chapter research report, and
summary report AND workshop 3.d. Setting Priorities and Taking Action (planning
retreat))
N
V
.cL.
N
q
N
5) Complete BR&E Package: Contact your Regional Extension Educator (Community must
complete an application for acceptance into the program)
• Standard package includes workshops A, B, C, D from #3, complete research package from
#4, and in-person BR&E consulting throughout all phases of the project including quarterly
meetings the first year of implementation.
• Premium package includes all of the standard package items plus a customized survey
instrument and University assistance in business selection.
• Urban/suburban programs require more complex sampling, additional efforts to get
representative sample size, etc. and therefore are priced accordingly.
a) Premium Urban/Suburban $18,000*
b) Standard $15,000*
c) Premium Rural $15,000*
d) Standard $12,000*
* $3,000 scholarship available through 12/31/07 if the community participates in a research
project on the impact of Community Leaders BR&E on social capital. For programs
accepted after 12/31/07 the scholarship is $1.,500.
T12e Un+versity of Minnesota is an equal a;ppcrtun+ty etlvcator and emplppe;r.
UNIVERSITY OF 1'IINNESOTA
Extension
~~~..
11-27-2007, 3
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA EXTENSION SERVICE
Who to contact
BR&E Strategies Program Contact: Michael Darger, 612-625-6246 or dar er"ahimn.edu
or Liz Templin, Associate Program Contact, 763-767-3880 or templin(a)umn.edu
Minnesota's Regional Extension Educators -Community Economics:
• Central: Adeel Ahmed, 320-203-6050 or ahme0004~a;umn.edu
• East Central (MN) and East Metro: Liz Templin, 763-767-3880 or templin(a%umn.edu
• Northeast: John Bennett, 218-726-6471 or ibennett(a%umnedu
• Northwest: contact Michael Darger, 612-625-6246 or darg_er(u-umn.edu
• South Central: David Nelson, 507-389-6660 or nelso417~zumn.edu
• Southeast: Bruce Schwartau, 507-536-6308 or bwschwar(a~umn.edu
• Southwest: contact Michael Darger, 612-625-6246 or dar~t,er a;umn.edi
• West and South Metro: Claudia Cody, 763-767-3875 or cody0031 u;urnu~.edu
• West Central: Ryan Pesch, 218-998-5794 or pesch(d~umn.edu
For Americans with Disabilities Act accommodations, please call (800) 876-8636. The
University of Minnesota Extension Service is an equal opportunity educator and employer.
bo
• ~V
The Univarsify pl ~Ainnespta is an equal opportunity educator and empivyer.
UNIVERSITY OF MI?VNESOTA
Extension
11-27-2007, 4
~~
AGENDA
MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
Wednesday, February 6th, 2008
6:00 PM
Commissioners: Rod Dragsten, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart, William Spartz, and
Barry Voight
Council Liaison: Susie Wojchouski
Staff: Angela Schumann, Gary Anderson, Kimberly Holien - NAC
1. Call to order.
2. Consideration to approve the minutes of January 2nd, 2008.
Consideration of adding items to the agenda.
4. Citizen comments.
5. Public Hearing - Consideration of a request for Final Plat and a request for Rezoning from B-3
(Highway Business to B-4 (Regional Business) District for the proposed JERRY HARTUNG
ADDITION.
Applicant: SB 22, LLC/Mike Krutzig
6. Public Hearing - Consideration of a request for Preliminary Plat for the proposed UNION
CROSSINGS THIRD ADDITION, a commercial subdivision in a B-4 (Regional Business) District.
Applicant: Ryan Companies US, Inc.
7. Public Hearing - Consideration of a request for Simple Subdivision, a request for Conditional Use
Permit for Joint Access in a B-4 (Regional Business) District.
Applicant: Premier Bank
Continued Public Hearing -Consideration of a request for Amendment to the Monticello Zoning
Ordinance, Chapter 3-5, Off-Street Parking Requirements, as related to the regulation of the size and
weight of vehicles parked in residential districts.
Applicant: City of Monticello
Adjourn.
•