City Council Minutes 04-09-2012MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, April 9, 2012 — 7 p.m.
Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center
Present: Clint Herbst, Lloyd Hilgart, Tom Perrault, Glen Posusta, Brian Stumpf
Absent: None
1. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Herbst called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and declared a quorum present.
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
2A. Approval of Minutes — March 26, 2012 Special Meeting
GLEN POSUSTA MOVED TO ACCEPT THE MARCH 26, 2012 SPECIAL MEETING
MINUTES AS PRESENTED. BRIAN STUMPF SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
2B. Approval of Minutes — March 26, 2012 Regular Meeting
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO ACCEPT THE MARCH 26, 2012 REGULAR
MEETING MINUTES AS PRESENTED. LLOYD HILGART SECONDED THE
MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda
• Add Item 5J to consent — EDA appointment
4. Citizen comments, public service announcements, and staff updates
a. Citizen Comments: Dr. Joe Mahoney gave an update on the hospital status. A
temporary surgeon, Dr. Winn Gregory, is on site at the hospital now. New River
Medical Center is hosting a workshop on April 21 for women. As the elected
representative from Monticello, he talked about the revenue loss of approximately
$1 million for first quarter due to the issues with between the hospital and
Monticello Clinic. There will be a public meeting of the Hospital Board on April
12tb at 6:30pm at the hospital.
b. Public Service Announcements: Clint Herbst announced the Lions annual fish fry
on April 23rd at River City Extreme.
C. Staff Updates: None
5. Consent Agenda:
City Council Minutes —April 9, 2012 Page 1
A. Consideration of approving payment of bills for April 9th. Recommendation:
Approve payment of bill and purchase card registers for a total of $406,663.51
B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments.
Recommendation: Ratify new hires and departures for MCC, Parks, FNM and
Streets.
C. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 4557 amending Title 6, Chapter 3 —
Animals; Fowl and adopting Summary Ordinance #557A for publication.
Recommendation: Adopt Ordinance #557 amending Title 6, Chapter 3
(Animals; Fowl) as proposed and adopt Summary Ordinance #557A for
publication.
D. Consideration of authorizing out -of -state travel for Finance Department staff to
attend the 2012 National GFOA Conference. Recommendation: Authorize the
Finance Director and Assistant Finance Director to attend the National GFOA
Conference in Chicago IL in June 2012 with expense reimbursements estimated at
$2000.
E. Consideration of adopting Resolution #2012 -034 accepting Easement Agreement
with Northern States Power Company /Xcel Energy for the realigmment of 120`i'
Street north of Interstate 94. Recommendation: Adopt Resolution #2012 -034
accepting Easement Agreement with NSP/Excel Energy for realignment of 120ul
Street north of I -94.
F. Consideration of ratifying the FiberNet services rate structure for June 2012 -May
2013 as approved by the FiberNet Advisory Board. Recommendation: Ratify
FNM video rate stricture changes for June 2012 -May 2013 as follows:
Service Description
Was
Now
Monticello Basic (One Service)
$13.80
$15.80
Monticello Basic (Two Services)
$13.20
$15.20
Monticello Basic (Three Services)
$12.80
$14.80
Monticello Expanded (One Service)
$46.85
$50.80
Monticello Expanded (Two Services)
$44.85
$48.80
Monticello Expanded (Three Services)
$43.55
$47.50
G. Consideration of approving a Conditional Use Permit for an attached Major
Accessory Structure in an R -1 (Single - Family) District for Lot 7, Block 1, River
Forest (9747 River Forest Drive). Applicant: Greg Curtis. Recommendation:
Approve CUP for an attached Major Accessory Structure in an R -1 District for
Lot 7, Block 1, River Forest for Applicant, Greg Curtis, based on findings
adopted by the Planning Commission and subject to the following conditions:
City Council Minutes —April 9, 2012 Page 2
• The use of the accessory structure shall be to directly serve the principal use and
must comply with ordinance requirements pertaining to private garages.
The applicant will be required to comply with ordinance requirements pertaining to
driveway setback, surfacing, maximum curb cut, and other off - street parking
requirements.
Issues related to grading and drainage shall be subject to review and comment by the
City Engineer.
H. Consideration of approving an amendment to Conditional Use Permit to expand a
storage facility accessory in a mobile home park in the M -H (Manufactured Home
Park) zoning district. Applicant: ICjellberg's Inc. THIS ITEM WAS
REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA.
L Consideration of approving purchase of televisions and digital sign software,
including the installation of equipment and software, with funding from Cable
Commission franchise fee reimbursements. Recommendation: Approve
purchase of AVIew Digital Signage Software and AVI TV monitors, and utilize
Wes Olson Electric for service needs at a total cost estimated at $$26,350 (plus
sales tax) to be paid out of Cable Commission franchise fee reimbursements.
J. Consideration of appointing a member to the Monticello Economic Development
Authority. Recommendation: Approve appointment of Rodney Dragsten to the
Monticello EDA with term ending December 31, 2017.
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA WITH THE
REMOVAL OF ITEM H AND ADDITION OF ITEM J. LLOYD HILGART
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
6. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion
SH. Consideration of'approving an amendment to Conditional Use Permit to expand
a storage facility accessory in a mobile home park in the M -H (Manufactured Home
Park) zoning district. Applicant. Kjellberg's Inc.
Clint Herbst stated he is not necessarily opposed to the CUP amendment but was not sure
if the evacuation plan that is tied into this, is adequate for the park residents. Ron
Hackemnueller noted that the residents are notified each year about their evacuation plan
and given instructions as to where to evacuate in case of an emergency. Clint Herbst was
concerned about sending residents to other buildings at sites adjacent to the park. Ron
Hackemnueller said that he has reviewed the plans that utilize the Kjellberg Business
Center and they are adequate as an emergency shelter. Clint Herbst is concerned about
the distance that building is located from the park and whether residents should be
required to go that far. He thought it might be good to table this item as he would like to
meet with Kjellberg's and review the evacuation plans. Lloyd Hilgart asked if there was
a certain distance allowed for location of a storm shelter. Ron Hackennueller stated that
City Council Minutes —April 9, 2012 Page 3
the law reads a "reasonable" distance so it is not real specific. Per Council request, Ron
Hackemnueller will set up a meeting with Kjellberg's.
CLINT HERBST MOVED TO TABLE THIS ITEM UNTIL THE NEXT COUNCIL
MEETING. GLEN POSUSTA SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
Tom Perrault asked Angela to clarify the Planning Commission resolution by properly
identifying the zoning district.
Public Hearine - Consideration of adopting Ordinance #558 amending the 2012 Fee
Schedule for a new Animal Control permit fee, and continue the Public Hearing to
April 23, 2012 for further consideration of BODS and TSS rates
Tom Kelly explained the request for the animal control permit fee and also requested the
public hearing to be continued to the next Council meeting for discussion of BODS and
TSS rates. Cathy Shuman answered several questions posed by Council related to the
animal control fee for a permit to keep fowl on the premises.
Mayor Herbst opened the public hearing. As there were no comments, he closed the
public hearing.
LLOYD HILGART MOVED FOR ALTERNATIVE #1 TO ADOPT ORDINANCE
#558 AMENDING THE 2012 FEE SCHEDULE TO INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL
ANIMAL CONTROL PERMIT FEE AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO
APRIL 23, 2012 FOR CONSIDERATION OF BODS AND TSS RATES. TOM
PERRAULT SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
8. Consideration of adoptine Ordinance #545 anprovine amendments to Title 10
Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Section 3.7 related to Overlay ordinances regulating
the Mississippi Wild, Scenic & Recreational River District and the Shoreland
District and amendments to Section 8 - Definitions, and repealing Chapter 27
regulating the Management of the Mississippi Wild, Scenic, and Recreational River
System ( MWSRR) and the Shoreland Areas of the City of Monticello; also adopting
Summary Ordinance #545A for publication
Angela Schumann introduced the new ordinance amendments involving Section 3.7 of
the Monticello Zoning Code related to overlay ordinances for the MWSRR and Shoreland
Districts. Upon approving the new amendments, Council would also be requested to
repeal Chapter 27 which served as the former ordinance with the MWSRR and Shoreland
districts combined.
Angela Schumann gave a presentation explaining the various components of the new
ordinance amendments: overlay districts to the base zoning district; updates to
definitions; meets state rules for the segment of the Mississippi that runs through the city;
establishes land use controls for development and protection of shorelands. The new
amendments will split the MWSRR and Shoreland districts into 2 separate sections.
City Council Minutes —April 9, 2012 -Page 4
MWSRR regulations include: lots of record, allowable uses, minimum standards for lots,
sewered and unsewered provisions, maximum impervious surface requirements, process
for development and agency action. Angela displayed the DNB's mapped inventory of
all public waters within the City and surrounding area within 1 mile. Shoreland
regulations include: procedure for permitting and review, shoreland classifications,
allowable uses, minimum standards for lots, sewered and unsewered provisions,
standards for public infrastructure, stonnwater management, maximum impervious
surface requirements.
Angela Schumann talked about the designation to the City's official zoning map for Wild
& Scenic and Shoreland overlay districts. With approval of the ordinance amendments,
this would also update the zoning map accordingly.
Planning Commission recommendation discussed ability for a property owner to rebuild
if significant damage occurred to a structure in one of these designated districts. There
are allowances for the City to permit rebuilding if Shoreland ordinance requirements are
met. Buildings within Floodplain districts are not allowed to rebuild if significantly
damaged. The Planning Commission unanimously supported the adoption of the
amendments and repeal of the former ordinance.
Glen Posusta asked about houses in a designated floodplain and what would happen if
they were destroyed. Angela Schumann explained that those properties may not be able
to rebuild under the law. FEMA is currently reviewing the floodplain maps and revising
them to meet new flood zone regulations. FEMA does have a buyback program related to
properties located in floodplain districts.
Tom Perrault also asked about floodplain areas and asked about those homes along Otter
Creek. Angela Schumann explained that there are different floodplain designations and
that would influence ability to rebuild. Torn Perrault had questions related to Table 3 -20
and 3 -21 about setbacks for sewered and unsewered properties and wanted a clarification
on how those values are established; Angela Schumann noted those are generally set by
the State. Tom noted that there were references to a Commissioner and asked that the
title be spelled out in all cases so it is clear (should be Commissioner of Department of
Natural Resources).
LLOYD HILGART MOVED FOR ALTERNATIVE #1 TO ADOPT ORDINANCE
#545 APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 10, SECTION 3.7 OF THE
MONTICELLO ZONING CODE RELATED TO OVERLAY ORDINANCES
REGULATING THE MISSISSIPPI WILD, SCENIC & RECREATIONAL RIVER
DISTRICT AND THE SHORELAND DISTRICT AND AMENDMENTS TO SECTION
8 (DEFINITIONS); REPEALING CHAPTER 27 OF ZONING CODE; AND
ADOPTING SUMMARY ORDINANCE #545A FOR PUBLICATION. BRIAN
STUMPF SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
City Council Minutes —April 9, 2012 Page 5
9. Public Hearing - Consideration of adopting Resolution #2012 -029A ordering
Improvements and authorizing Preparation of Plans and Specifications for 2012
Rural Road Improvements, City Project No. 12C001
Bruce Westby introduced this item with a presentation regarding the rural streets under
consideration as part of the 2012 Rural Road Improvements. Bruce Westby reviewed
each of the road segments including Edmonson, Fallon, and Fenning Avenues, pointing
out the areas to be improved. Bruce Westby explained the work that staff has conducted
to review the road surfaces and assign PCI (pavement condition index) ratings. In the
resulting ratings, Edmonson was rated in worst condition with ratings below 40 in some
sections (0 -35 complete reconstruction; 36 -60 resurface or mill & overlay). Staff would
recommend reclaiming and repaving the entire road. For Fallon Avenue, staff would
recommend either a reclaim and repave or an overlay project, depending on the assumed
time frame for residential development to the south. Fenning Avenue would be
recommended for an overlay.
Bruce Westby displayed a life cycle graph to show expectations for the life expectancy of
a road using various maintenance strategies. Glen Posusta asked about Hwy 25 which
shows a lot of wear and tear for the number of years since it was last reconstructed.
Bruce Westby explained there are many factors that must be taken into account when
determining the life expectancy of a pavement including the amount and type of traffic.
Bruce Westby talked about cost comparisons for various bituminous pavement
rehabilitation options and the typical life expectancy of each option. Bruce Westby
displayed pictures of various sections of existing pavement on the three roads under
review. Bruce Westby pointed out that Fenning could be overlayed and that should
extend its life for a considerable length of time.
Bruce Westby reviewed the proposed improvements for Edmonson Avenue and
compared 2 options. Option #1 — reclaim and repave 5,850 feet leaving it as a rural
section, or Option #2 — full reconstruction to urban section. The City could use state aid
funds for a portion of the costs, as long as the road met their design requirements. Bruce
Westby also addressed a letter submitted from residents of Golden Eagle Villas Estates
regarding constructing a pathway along Edmonson. Parks Commission recommended
waiting until the property to the west is developed as a pathway is designated for the land
at that time. Bruce Westby also discussed a letter received from a property owner along
Edmonson that does not agree with assessing his property. If Council wishes to assess
adjoining property owners, city staff would work with owners that may have objections.
Bruce Westby reviewed the costs for the various options for Edmonson with estimated
assessments for Option #1 at $51 /front foot for non - residential and $4,000 /lot for
residential properties, which would be the same rate as 2011. Bruce Westby suggested
that ALP Learning Center could be assessed similar to Alano as an equivalent residential
property. Glen Posusta stated that he thinks this property should be assessed as a
commercial property as that was the former use. The school district is leasing the
property which is not really a residential use. Bruce Westby noted that would impact the
City Council Minutes —April 9, 2012 Page 6
estimated assessments. Bruce Westby pointed out which properties would be assessed if
the intent of Council was to assess benefiting properties.
Fallon Avenue was reviewed next with Option #1 to reclaim and repave 2,800 feet
leaving it as a rural section, or Option #2 for a 1 1/2" overlay for 2,800 feet with milling
along all joint areas. Staff also recommends flattening the inslope into the wetland area,
if possible. Bruce Westby displayed the properties that would be assessed with this
project. Bruce Westby noted the estimated cost of assessments for residential
($4,000 /lot) and non - residential properties ($36.30 /front foot). Glen Posusta questioned
why they would not improve the road all the way to 85th Street NE; Bruce Westby
pointed out that the section of road along Hunter's Crossing is in pretty good condition
and would not need to be improved at this time.
Fenning Avenue is proposed for a 1 ' /2" overlay of 3,600 feet. There had previously been
discussion of constructing a pathway along a section of Fenning near Monte Club Hill,
but that is not recommended. Estimated assessment costs would be $4,000 /lot for
residential and $7 /front foot for non - residential.
Bruce Westby pointed out township properties that would border improvements on
Fenning and Fallon Avenues. Although it is not intended to include them in the
assessment rolls for these improvements, the properties were noticed so that they could be
assessed for their share of the cost differential at the time they might be annexed.
Bruce Westby discussed several cost alternatives proposed for the rural road project.
• Alternative A - $870,680 (Edmonson option #1, Fallon option #1)
• Alternative B - $807,390 (Edmonson option #1, Fallon option #2)
• Alternative C - $2,065,900 (Edmonson option #2, Fallon option #1)
• Alternative D - $2,002,610 (Edmonson option #2, Fallon option #2)
Bruce Westby reviewed the funding sources for the various alternatives that were
presented to Council including special assessments, state aid funds, trunk utility funds,
and street reconstruction funds. He noted that staff recommends using state aid funds for
a portion of the project and utilizing special assessments and the Street Reconstruction
fiord for the balance of the project.
Bruce Westby talked about the projected schedule for the improvements which would
include award a contract by June 25, completing construction in October, and holding an
assessment hearing at the October 22 Council meeting.
Bruce Westby reviewed the considerations for Council with staff recommending
Alternative A which would reclaim and repave Edmonson and Fallon Avenues and
overlay Fenning Avenue.
Brian Stumpf asked about the $51 assessment calculation for the front footage on non-
residential property along Edmonson. Bruce Westby explained that would be calculated
from the total projected cost divided by the total assessable front feet. Brian Stumpf also
City Council Minutes —April 9, 2012 Page 7
asked about micro- surfacing. Mike Rief from WSB explained that is a resurfacing
method applied to a road that has a fairly substantial base. Edmonson Avenue would not
be a good candidate for this method as the base is not stable enough.
Tom Perrault asked about possible replacement of culverts if found to be in bad
condition. Bruce Westby explained that the contingency funds should cover any culverts
that might have to be replaced. Lloyd Hilgart asked about Alternative B, which is only a
difference of about $50,000. Mike Rief from WSB explained that it is more costly to put
an overlay on a road with a badly- deteriorated surface due to all the preparation work that
would be required.
Glen Posusta stated that he is disappointed that staff did not include costs of overlay as
requested. He does not feel it is worthwhile to reclaim and repave when those roads
would have to be dug up when redevelopment occurs. He questioned why staff is
recommending additional milling on Fenning when they could just do an overlay. Brice
Westby explained that the milling would only be done at the road joints. Glen Posusta
pointed out that the township only overlays and feels that the City could save money by
simply doing overlays. Clint Herbst stated that he had looked at Fenning and was
surprised at all the cracking in the overlay that the township had done just a year or so
again. He feels that an overlay may not be satisfactory in all cases depending on the
condition of the road. Glen Posusta stated he would like to save some money by doing
overlays and allocate some funds for some other city streets that need work such as
Chelsea Road.
Tom Perrault asked about potential future assessments for annexed properties and how
those amounts would be calculated. Bruce Westby explained that the remaining life of
the pavement, assuming a design life of 20 years, would be taken into consideration and
the assessment would be pro -rated based on the remaining life.
Lloyd Hilgart asked about the residential rate of $4,000 and which properties would be
affected. Bruce Westby explained that rate would only apply to residential properties that
have a driveway directly accessing one of the roads being improved. Homes within a
development and having no direct access would not get assessed.
Mayor Herbst opened the public hearing.
Franklin Denn, Monticello Township Board Chair, spoke about township roads. He
stated that they had worked with the County Engineer many years ago for advice on
constructing roads. They advised the township to spend only what it would cost to put in
the roads. He spoke against assessing properties for road improvements and noted that
the township has always levied to cover for road improvements rather than assess the
property owners. He does not support assessing agricultural land for such improvements.
Clint Herbst explained that the City is not going to assess any township property. The
City will reserve the right in the future to assess a portion of the costs if a developer
would annex township property and then work with the City to develop the property.
City Council Minutes —April 9, 2012 Page 8
Franklin Dean said that some of the township folks are concerned about why the City is
doing these improvements and what the full intent of the City is toward the township.
Clint Herbst explained again that there is no cost to the township; the notification is
intended to keep the township residents informed. Glen Posusta pointed out that the
Orderly Annexation Agreement states that the City is responsible for the town line roads.
Brian Stumpf explained that the City realized that some of the line roads are in pretty bad
condition and the City is simply going through the process of discussing the
improvements; holding a public hearing is part of the process.
Ron Denn, 97 Eisele Avenue, was wondering about building entitlements. In other
words, if a piece of the property is sold off, how would that property be affected by an
assessment. Glen Posusta pointed out that the property would only have the potential of
being assessed if the property were annexed into the city. Mr. Deml also asked if there
would be interest added to the assessment if a property were annexed and developed.
City staff noted that they were not intending to accrue interest on these assessments.
Charlie Pfeffer, representing Ocello LLC, spoke regarding the proposed Edmonson
Avenue improvements. He addressed the economic impact of adding assessments to the
property he represents. Some of the property is already covered by a development
agreement and would not be affected by this project. However, there is a large piece of
land that is used for agricultural purposes at this time. He noted some of the assessments
for which Ocello is currently malting payments. Charlie does not disagree with the need
for assessing projects but he is concerned about the economic impacts on a non - revenue
producing property such as the piece of land zoned agricultural. Clint Herbst asked Mr.
Pfeffer if he agrees that the road is in bad condition, which he does. Mr. Pfeffer stated he
would appreciate the least financial impact possible for the Edmonson improvements.
Shannon Bye, Monticello Township Board representative, asked whether there were
Developer Agreements to cover some of the costs for these road improvements and if
there were existing funds available to help with the costs. Glen Posusta explained that
Bruce Westby addressed that during his presentation. Special assessments that were
previously collected and being held in reserve were intended to be used for completing
full urban section reconstruction of these roads. Although Council could elect to use
some of these funds now, it might be better to apply them in the future when such
sections are needed.
Ron Chihos, owner of a property along Edmonson Avenue, expressed his concern about
paying assessments for road improvements and then possibly having to pay for more
construction again down the road. He asked Council to consider doing only work needed
to extend the life of the road until it would be reconstructed due to redevelopment.
Clint Herbst closed the public hearing.
Clint Herbst commented that Council will deal with assessments after they get the bids
back. They will decide which fiends are to be used for the road improvements, such as
City Council Minutes —April 9, 2012 Page 9
state aid funds or street reconstruction funds but would want to do this as cheaply as
possible at this time.
Lloyd Hilgart discussed the lack of potential for further lot development in the existing
developments, which would probably extend the time before the City would actually need
to do major reconstruction on Edmonson, Fallon or Fenning Avenues. Chances are that it
would be at least 10 years or more before the City would even need to consider
reconstruction. Lloyd Hilgart therefore feels that it is probably worth an extra $40,000
for Alternative A to reclaim the existing pavement and repave Fallon Avenue versus
overlaying it, which would require up to $25,000 more than the estimated cost in the
Feasibility Report for needed patching and repairs. Glen Posusta questioned whether
public works staff could assist with the patching and repair work to help defray some of
the cost. Bruce Westby explained that it was initially assumed that public works staff
would fill any potholes and cracks on roads receiving an overlay, but upon further review
of the pavement condition of Fallon Avenue it was determined that several areas would
need more extensive repairs before overlaying so the work needs to be contracted out to
allow staff to complete their regular duties.
Glen Posusta asked Shannon Bye to explain how the township maintains their roads.
Shannon explained that their roads are all listed on a replacement cycle. They do regular
maintenance on the roads each year in addition to scheduled overlays. If a road has bad
spots, those spots are dug out and repaired before an overlay is done.
Glen Posusta asked about other city street maintenance that is scheduled for this year.
Bob Paschke stated that the City does have a regular street maintenance cycle. For
example, this year they plan to sealcoat Chelsea Road. Glen Posusta wanted to know
why they aren't looking at doing that in conjunction with the rural road project. Bruce
Westby said that City staff has been reviewing those processes. However, the sealcoating
process is different from an overly or repaving and uses other equipment.
CLINT HERBST MOVED FOR ALTERNATIVE #1 TO ADOPT RESOLUTION
#2012 -029A ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT, ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS
AND AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
ALTERNATIVE A (EDMONSON OPTION #1, FALLON OPTION #1, FENNING
OVERLAY) FOR 2012 RURAL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, CITY PROJECT NO.
12C001. LLOYD HILGART SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
10. Consideration of adding Pathway Reconstruction for three Segments to 2012 Rural
Road Improvements, City Project No. 12C001
Bruce Westby explained that this item is being brought up at this meeting per direction of
Council from the April 91h meeting. Bruce Westby reviewed the three pathway segments
that are being requested to be added to the Rural Roads Improvements project for repairs
to be made. Bruce Westby explained that City staff is recommending reclaiming and
repaving segments 1 and 2, and on segment 3 completing repairs to a cross - culvert and
several spot repairs to the pathway. The total length of the three segments is 1,630 feet.
City Council Minutes —April 9, 2012 Page 10
Glen Posusta asked what the cost would run for an overlay. Bruce Westby showed the
comparative costs and indicated that reconstructing the pathways would extend their life
much longer than an overlay would. Glen Posusta suggested perhaps overlaying the
smaller lengths and reconstructing the longer segment and then monitoring their wear to
see which treatment is the most cost - effective. Bruce Westby noted that staff is now
tracking the reconstruction and maintenance schedules for all roads and pathways for
future use in determining which treatments are the most cost - effective to use.
Lloyd Hilgart feels that the 3 segments should be reconstructed. Tom Perrault confirmed
with Brice Westby that the 3`d segment was mainly reconstructing a culvert. Bruce
Westby confirmed that segment is in poor condition, but staff feels we can get another 5
years of useful life or so out of the pathway before reconstructing it.
TOM PERRAULT MOVED FOR ALTERNATIVE #1 TO ADD THE THREE
PATHWAY SEGMENT IMPROVEMENTS TO THE 2012 RURAL ROAD
IMPROVEMENTS, CITY PROJECT NO. 12CO01 AS PROPOSED. LLOYD
HILGART SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 3 -2 WITH GLEN
POSUSTA AND BRIAN STUMPF VOTING IN OPPOSITION.
11. Added items
No items were added to the agenda.
12. Adjournment
BRIAN STUMPF MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 9:10 P.M. TOM
PERRAULT SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5 -0.
Recorder: Catherine M. Shuman
Approved: May 14, 2012
Attest:
v ninistrator
City Council Minutes —April 9, 2012 Page 11