The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Agenda Packet 09-26-2011AGENDA REGULARMEETING–MONTICELLOCITYCOUNCIL Monday,September26,2011–7p.m. MississippiRoom–MonticelloCommunityCenter Mayor:ClintHerbst CouncilMembers:LloydHilgart,TomPerrault,GlenPosusta,BrianStumpf 1.CalltoOrderandPledgeofAllegiance 2A.ApprovalofMinutes–September12,2011SpecialWorkshop 2B.ApprovalofMinutes–September12,2011RegularMeeting 2C.ApprovalofMinutes–September14,2011SpecialMeeting(JointEDA) 3.Considerationofaddingitemstotheagenda 4.Citizencomments,publicserviceannouncements,andstaffupdates a.CitizenComments: b.PublicServiceAnnouncements: 1)BusinessExpo(10/2) 2)BeyondtheYellowRibbonCommittee(10/25) c.StaffUpdates: 1)EmbracingDowntown 2)ConstructionProjects 5.ConsentAgenda: A.ConsiderationofapprovingpaymentofbillsforSeptember26th B.ConsiderationofapprovingnewhiresanddeparturesforCitydepartments C.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-88toacceptcontributionfromTom PerraultfortheGeneralFund D.Considerationofadopting Ordinance#537establishingaCableFranchisebetweenthe CityofMonticelloand BridgewaterTelephoneCompany,dbaTDSTelecom,and considerationofadoptingOrdinance#537Aforsummarypublication E.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-89orderingpreparationof assessmentrollandcallingforanAssessmentHearingtoadoptassessmentsfor 2011StreetReconstruction,CityProjectNo.11C001 F.Considerationofapprovinganapplicationforanon-saleintoxicatingliquorand SundayliquorlicenseforCapitanPanchoVillaMexicanRestaurantat100West 7th Street G.ConsiderationofapprovingawaiveroftheBuildingPlanReviewFeefor SuburbanManufacturinginaccordancewiththeBusinessExpansionIncentive PilotProgram H.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-90approvingfinalpaymenttoFuller ConcreteandMasonry,LLCandacceptingworkonthesecondCommon-Use DumpsterEnclosureinBlock35MunicipalParkingLot,CityProjectNo.10C008 I.ConsiderationofapprovinganamendmenttoConditionalUsePermitforPlanned UnitDevelopmentforLot1,Block2,CarconeAddition(103SandbergRoad); Applicant:WestMetroAutoDealership J.ConsiderationofapprovingaplatcorrectionforMorningGlory 6.Considerationofitemsremovedfromtheconsentagendafordiscussion 7.PublicHearing–Considerationofcancellingapublichearingamendingthebudgetplan forTaxIncrementFinancingDistrictNo.1-5 8.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-91approvingsaleofG.O.Refunding Bonds,Series2011A 9.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-92amendingtheMonticelloComprehensive PlanandrezoningfromI-1(LightIndustrial)toB-4(RegionalBusiness)forLot1,Block 1,MonticelloCommerceCenter5th (9766FallonAv);Applicant:RiverwoodBank 10.Considerationofreimbursingpropertyownerat102CedarStreetforretainingwall materials,CityProjectNo.11C001 11.Addeditems 12.Adjournment CityCouncilAgenda:09/26/11 1 5A.ConsiderationofapprovingpaymentofbillregistersforSeptember26th (TK) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: TheattachedbillregisterscontainallinvoicesprocessedsincethelastCouncilmeeting. SubjecttoMNStatutes,mostinvoicesrequireCouncilapprovalpriortoreleasingchecks forpayment.ThedayfollowingCouncilapproval,paymentswillbereleasedunless directedotherwise. IfCouncilhasnoquestionsorcommentsonthebillregisters,thesecanbeapprovedwith theconsentagenda.Ifrequested,thisitemcanberemovedfromconsentanddiscussed priortomakingamotionforapproval. A1.BudgetImpact:None A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Noadditionalworkrequired B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Motiontoapprovethebillregistersforatotalamountof$1,449,047.29. 2.MotiontoapprovethebillregisterswithchangesdirectedbyCouncil. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1or#2,perdirectionofCouncil. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Billregisters CityCouncilAgenda:09/26/11 1 5B.ConsiderationofapprovingnewhiresanddeparturesforCitydepartments (TE) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: TheCouncilisaskedtoratifythehiringanddeparturesofemployeesthathaveoccurred recentlyinthedepartmentslisted.ItisrecommendedthattheCouncilofficiallyratifythe hiring/departureofalllistedemployeesincludingpart-timeandseasonalworkers. A1.BudgetImpact:(positionsaregenerallyincludedinbudget) A2.StaffWorkLoadImpact:Ifnewpositions,theremaybesometraining involved.Ifterminatedpositions,existingstaffwouldpickupthosehours,as needed,untilreplaced. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Motiontoratifythehire/departuresoftheemployeesasidentifiedontheattached list. 2.Motiontodenytherecommendedhiresanddepartures. C.RECOMMENDATION: BystatutetheCityCouncilhastheauthoritytoapproveallhires/departures.Citystaff recommendsAlternative#1,fortheCounciltoapprovethehiresand/ordeparturesas listed. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Listofnew/terminatedemployees Name Title Department Hire Date Class Name Reason Department Last Day Class Robert Christenson Voluntary MCC 9/10 PT Sue Lensing Voluntary DMV 8/29 FT NEW EMPLOYEES TERMINATING EMPLOYEES Book1: 9/21/2011 CityCouncilAgenda:09/26/11 1 5C.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-88toacceptcontributionfromTom PerraultfortheGeneralFund (CS) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: TomPerraultiscontributing$250forSeptembertogointotheGeneralFund.As requiredbystatestatute,iftheCityacceptsthedonationoffunds,theCityCouncilneeds toadoptaresolutionspecifyingtheamountofthedonationanditsuse. A1.BudgetImpact:None A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Staffaccountsforandreconcilesdonationscontributed throughtheCity. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Approvethecontributionsandauthorizeuseoffundsasspecified. 2.Donotapprovethecontributionsandreturnthefundstothedonors. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: Staffrecommendationistoadopttheresolutionacceptingthecontributions. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: ResolutionNo.2011-88 CityofMonticello RESOLUTIONNO.2011-88 APPROVINGCONTRIBUTIONS WHEREAS,theCityofMonticelloisgenerallyauthorizedtoaccept contributionsofrealandpersonalpropertypursuanttoMinnesotaStatutesSections 465.03and465.04forthebenefitofitscitizensandisspecificallyauthorizedtomaintain suchpropertyforthebenefitofitscitizensinaccordancewiththetermsprescribedbythe donor.SaidgiftsmaybelimitedunderprovisionsofMNStatutesSection471.895. WHEREAS,thefollowingpersonsandorentitieshaveofferedtocontribute contributionsorgiftstotheCityaslisted: DONOR/ENTITYDESCRIPTIONVALUE TomPerraultCash$250 WHEREAS,allsaidcontributionsareintendedtoaidtheCityinestablishing facilities,operationsorprogramswithinthecity’sjurisdictioneitheraloneorin cooperationwithothers,asallowedbylaw;and WHEREAS,theCityCouncilherebyfindsthatitisappropriatetoacceptthe contributionsoffered. NOWTHEREFOREBEITRESOLVED bytheCityCouncilofMonticelloas follows: 1.ThecontributionsdescribedaboveareherebyacceptedbytheCityof Monticello. 2.Thecontributionsdescribedabovewillbeusedasdesignatedbythe donor.Thismayentailreimbursingorallocatingthemoneytoanother entitythatwillutilizethefundsforthefollowingstatedpurpose: DONOR/ENTITYRECIPIENTPURPOSE TomPerraultCityofMonticelloGeneralfund(Sept) AdoptedbytheCityCouncilofMonticellothis26thdayofSeptember,2011. CITYOFMONTICELLO ______________________________ ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________________ JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator CityCouncilAgenda:09/26/11 1 5D.ConsiderationofadoptingOrdinance#537establishingaCableFranchisebetween theCityofMonticelloandBridgewaterTelephoneCompany,dbaTDSTelecom, andconsiderationofadoptingOrdinance#537Aforsummarypublication (JJ/JO/CS) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: AttheJune27th meeting,Councilheldapublichearingtograntacablefranchiseto BridgewaterTelephoneCompany,dbaTDSTelecom.UnderMNStateStatutesChapter 238,acablefranchiseagreementmustbepresentedforapprovalatleast7daysafterthe publichearing.CouncilisbeingaskedtoadoptOrdinance#537whichoutlinesthecable franchiseagreementbetweentheCityofMonticelloandBridgewaterTelephone/TDS Telecom. Inkeepingwiththestaterequirementthatnoagreementcanhavetermsandconditions morefavorableorlessburdensomethananexistingagreement,CityAttorneyJoel JamnikcraftedtheBridgewater/TDSCableFranchiseOrdinancetobealmostidenticalto theCableFranchiseOrdinancesthatwereapprovedwithCharterCommunicationsand FiberNetMonticello. TheproposedordinanceoutlinestheabilityforTDSTelecomtobuildacablesystemand offercableservice,setsafranchisetermofabout9years(expiresMarch29,2020),and establishestheserviceareaasthecorporateboundariesoftheCity.Therearesections describingthesystemcapacity,communityserviceprogramming,dropsandservicesto publicbuildings,andprovisionsrelatedtofranchisefees. TheCableFranchiseOrdinancewasreviewedbytheSherburneWrightCable CommissionmembersattheAugust4th Commissionmeeting.CommissionAttorney BobVoserecommendedseveralchangestothelanguage.Thosewereforwardedtoour CityAttorneywhoworkedonmodificationsthatwereincorporatedintothefinal ordinancedocument. CouncilisalsoaskedtoadopttheSummaryOrdinance#537Awhichwillbeusedfor publicationofthecablefranchiseordinanceasrequiredbylaw.Itshouldbenotedthata summaryordinancerequiresasupermajority(4/5)voteofapproval. A1.BudgetImpact:Costsrelatedtopublicationofordinanceandattorneyfees. Thesecostswillbecoveredbya$2500depositpaidbyTDSTelecom. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:None. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoadoptCableFranchiseOrdinance#537betweentheCityofMonticello andBridgewaterTelephoneCompany,dbaTDSTelecom,andtoadoptSummary Ordinance#537Aforpublication. CityCouncilAgenda:09/26/11 2 2.MotiontodenyadoptionofCableFranchiseOrdinance#537atthistime. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1toadopttheordinancefortheCableFranchiseand approvethesummaryordinanceforpublication.Thisordinancewouldtakeeffectupon publication,whichisplannedforThursday,October6,2011intheMonticelloTimes. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Ordinance#537–CableFranchiseforBridgewaterTelephoneCompany,dbaTDS Telecom Ordinance#537A–SummaryOrdinance ORDINANCENO.537 1 CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA ANORDINANCEGRANTINGAFRANCHISETOBRIDGEWATER TELEPHONECOMPANYD/B/ATDSTELECOMTOCONSTRUCT, OPERATE,ANDMAINTAINACABLESYSTEMANDPROVIDE CABLESERVICEINTHECITYOFMONTICELLO,MINNESOTA RECITALS 1.ThisCableFranchiseOrdinance(“Franchise”)ismadeandenteredintobyandbetween theCityofMonticello,amunicipalcorporationoftheStateofMinnesota(“City”)and TDSBridgeWaterTelephoneCompanyd/b/aTDSTelecom(“TDS”). 2.PursuanttoMinnesotaStatutesChapter238,inparticular§238.08andCityOrdinance No.419(“CableOrdinance”),theCityisauthorizedtograntandissueanon-exclusive franchiseauthorizingTDStoprovidecableserviceandconstruct,operate,andmaintaina cablesystemintheCitysubjecttoChapter238. 3.UponevaluationofTDS’stechnical,financial,legalqualifications,completionof franchisenegotiations,andasaresultofapublichearing,theCityfindsthatitisinthe bestinterestsoftheCityanditsresidentstograntandissuetheFranchisetoTDS. 4.ThisFranchiseisnonexclusiveandisintendedtocomplywithapplicablelawsand regulations.AnyapplicablerequirementestablishedbyMinn.Stat.238.084orotherstate orfederallawnotexpresslyincorporatedinthisFranchiseshallbedeemedincorporated byreferenceasthoughfullysetforthherein. 5.ThisFranchiseisnotintendedtograntafranchisetoTDSontermsthataremore favorableorlessburdensomethanthoseintheexistingcablefranchisewithCharter Communications,FiberNet,oranyfuturefranchisee.ShouldCharterCommunications, FiberNetoranyfuturefranchiseebelievethatanycablefranchiseissuedbytheCityis morefavorableorlessburdensomethanthoseinanexistingfranchise,thatfranchisee shallhavetherightprovidedbyOrdinance419topetitiontheCityCouncilforfranchise amendmentstorelievethefranchiseeofprovisionsmakingitsfranchiselessfavorableor moreburdensome.Thoseproposalsmayincluderequestsforamendmentstoeithertheir franchiseorthisFranchise,andtheCityCouncilreservestherighttoamendthis ordinanceortoseektoamendotherfranchiseordinancestocomplywiththisstandard. THECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFMONTICELLOHEREBYORDAINS: SECTION1.GENERALPROVISIONS Section1.1 Definitions.Unlessotherwisedefinedherein,theterms,phrases,and wordscontainedinthisFranchisehavethemeaningprovidedintheCableOrdinance.Terms, phrasesandwordscontainedinthisFranchisethatarenotdefinedhereorintheCableOrdinance willhavetheirnormalandcustomarymeaning. ORDINANCENO.537 2 Section1.2 WrittenNotice.Allnotices,reports,ordemandsrequiredtobegivenin writingunderthisFranchiseortheCableOrdinancemustbedeliveredpersonallytotheGeneral ManagerofTDSortheCityAdministratorordepositedintheUnitedStatesmailinasealed envelope,withregisteredorcertifiedmailpostageprepaidthereon,addressedtothepartyto whomnoticeisbeinggiven,asfollows: IftoCity:CityofMonticello Attn:CityAdministrator 505WalnutAvenue,Suite1 Monticello,Minnesota55362-8822 Withcopiesto:Chair,Sherburne/WrightCountiesCableCommunications Commission c/oCityofBuffalo 212CentralAvenue Buffalo,Minnesota55313 IftoTDS:TDSTelecomAttn:Manager-VideoServices 525JunctionRoad Madison,WI53717 Suchaddressesmaybechangedbyeitherpartyuponnoticetotheotherpartygivenas providedinthisSection. SECTION2.GRANTOFFRANCHISE Section2.1 Grant. a.TDSisauthorizedtoerect,construct,operateandmaintainin,along, across,above,overandundertherights-of-way,nowinexistenceandasmaybecreated orestablishedduringthetermofthisFranchiseanypoles,wires,cable,underground conduits,manholes,andotherconductorsandfixturesnecessaryforthemaintenanceand operationofaCableSystemintheCity.NothinginthisFranchiseshallbeconstruedto prohibitTDSfromofferinganyserviceoveritsCableSystemthatisnotprohibitedby federal,stateorlocallaw. b.ThisFranchiseisgrantedpursuanttotheCableOrdinance.Byaccepting thisFranchise,TDSagreestobeboundbythetermsoftheCableOrdinanceandthis Franchise.IntheeventofanyconflictbetweentheprovisionsofthisFranchiseandthe CableOrdinance,theprovisionsofthisFranchiseshallgovern. c.ThisFranchiseshallbenonexclusiveandCitymaygrantadditional franchisesatanytime.TheCitywillnotgrantanadditionalfranchiseontermsand conditionsmorefavorableorlessburdensomethanthoseinthisFranchise.TheCitymay imposeadditionaltermsandconditionsinanyadditionalfranchise. d.IntheeventtheCitygrantsanadditionalfranchisethatTDSbelievesis morefavorableorlessburdensomethaninthisFranchise,TDSshallhavearightto ORDINANCENO.537 3 petitionforfranchiseamendmentstorelieveTDSofprovisionsmakingitsFranchiseless favorableormoreburdensome.TDSshallfileapetitionthat: 1.Identifiesthecompetitor(s); 2.IdentifiesthebasisforTDS’sbeliefthatcertainprovisionsofthe additionalfranchisearemorefavorableorlessburdensomethanits existingFranchise; 3.Identifiesthefranchiseprovisionstobeamended. Section2.2 FranchiseTerm.ThisFranchiseisgrantedforatermthatwillexpireon March29,2020(the“ExpirationDate”),unlesssoonerrenewedorrevoked.TheExpiration DatematchestheexpirationdatefortheotherfranchisedcableoperatorsintheCityanditisthe City’sintenttoaddressfranchiserenewalrequestsofCharter,FiberNetandTDSatthesame timepriortotheExpirationDate.AnyrenewalofthisFranchiseshallbeperformedin accordancewithapplicablefederal,stateandlocallawsandregulations.Pursuantto47U.S.C. 546,TDSshallprovidenoticeofitsintenttoseekrenewalofthisFranchise36-30monthsprior totheFranchiseExpirationDate. Section2.3 ServiceArea. a.ThisFranchiseisgrantedforthecorporateboundariesoftheCity,asit existsfromtimetotime,subjecttothedensityrequirementofSection2.3.bbelow.The CitywillnotifyTDSinwritingintheeventtheCityannexesanyareasthatTDSwillbe requiredtoserve. b.TDSwillextenditsCableSystemandoffercableservice,withina reasonabletime,afterarequestforservice,toareaswithadensityofatleastnine(9) residentialunitsperone-quarter(1/4)cablemileofsystem,asmeasuredfromthenearest CableSystemtrunklineordistributioncableasofthedateofsuchrequestforservice. Wherethedensityislessthanthatspecifiedabove,TDSmayrequirethatpersons requestingservicepayaportionofthecostofthecapitalcostofthelineextensionin advance.TDSshallprovideafreewrittenestimateofthetotalcostforextensionandthe requiredpaymentamountwithinfifteen(15)daysoftherequestforservice.Thecharge forinstallationorextensionforeachpersonrequestingserviceshallnotexceedaprorata shareoftheactualcostofextendingtheservice.Subscribersshallalsoberesponsiblefor anystandard/non-standardinstallationchargestoextendtheCableSystemfromthetapto theresidence. SECTION3.SYSTEM Section3.1 SystemCapacity.TDScurrentlyoperatesandmaintainsa communicationssystemwhichprovidestelecommunicationsandinformationservicesto residentsandbusinesses(“TelecommunicationsNetwork”)withintheCitypursuanttoauthority prescribedintheCertificateofNeedissuedbytheMinnesotaPublicUtilitiesCommission. UtilizingitsTelecommunicationsNetwork,GranteeshallmaintainandoperatewithintheCity anInternetProtocoltelevision(IPTV)applicationthroughwhich Internettelevision servicesare ORDINANCENO.537 4 deliveredusingthearchitectureandnetworkingmethodsof InternetProtocol overapacket- switchednetworkinfrastructuresystem,generallyreferredtointhisFranchisehereinasa“Cable System”providingaminimumofatleast75videoprogrammedchannelsthroughoutthetermof thisFranchise.TheCableSystemmusthavereturncapabilityandpermit“narrowcasting”as providedinSection4.2(c)unlesssufficientchannelsareavailableasspecifiedinthatSection. TDSacknowledgesthatthisFranchiseisgrantedpursuanttoMinnesotaStatutesChapter238. TDSagreestobeboundbyChapter238unlesspreemptedbyapplicablestateorfederallaw. Section3.2 ConstructionDeadline.ExceptforTDS’sCableSystemextension obligationspursuanttoSection2.3,systemconstructionissubstantiallycomplete.Exceptas otherwiserequiredbyaRight-ofWayOrdinance,TDSwillusebesteffortstocompleteany CableSystemextensionandconstructionofnewfacilitiesfornewdevelopments contemporaneouswithinstallationofotherutilities.TheCityshallprovidereasonableandtimely advancewrittennoticeofthelocationofallnewdevelopmentstoTDS. SECTION4.COMMUNITYSERVICES Section4.1 CommercialVideoProgramming.TDSwillprovidebroadcategoriesof videoprogramming,includingnews,sportsandentertainment. Section4.2 PEGAccessFacilities. a.AccessChannels.TDSmustdedicateaminimumoftwo(2)channelsfor PEGAccessprogramming.Thetwo(2)PEGAccessChannelsmustbecablecastonthe BasicCableServicetier.AllsubscriberswhoreceiveCableServicesofferedontheCable SystemmustreceivethePEGAccessChannelsatnoadditionalcharge.Nothingherein shalldiminishtheCity’srightstosecureadditionalchannelspursuanttoMinn.Stat.§ 238.084,Subd.1(z),andapplicableFCCregulations. b.ResponsibilityforPEGAccess.TheCitywilloperate,administer,and managePEGAccessprogrammingpursuanttothisSection4.2.TheCitywillbe responsibleforthechannelcurrentlyusedforpublicaccessprogramming.TheCitymay delegateitsPEGAccessauthorityandresponsibilitiestotheCommission.TDS acknowledgesthattheCommissionmaycoordinatetheexpenditureofFranchiseFees andPEGCapitalFeesbyandamongtheCommission’smembermunicipalities.Nothing hereinshallobligatetheCitytomakeequipmentorchannelsavailableforpublicaccess programmingortoanyparticularprogrammer. c.Narrowcast.IfinthefutureTDSservesareasoutsidetheCity,atleastone (1)PEGAccessChannelmustpermittheCitytoprovide“narrowcast”programmingof events;i.e.permitsaprogramtobecablecastonsuchchannelforviewingsolelybyCity residentswhileresidentsinadjoiningtownshipsorcitiesservedbyTDSsimultaneously viewotherprogrammingonthatchannel.ThisprovisionmaybewaivedbytheCityif TDSprovidessufficientchannelstoallowallservedareastoviewallprogrammed events. d.LiveOrigination.TDSmustensurethatliveprogrammingmaybe originatedandcablecastfromthepublicinstitutionalsiteslistedinExhibitAattached ORDINANCENO.537 5 heretoprovidedhowever,thatTDSshallonlyberequiredtopaythecostofthefirstone hundredandfifty(150)feetofanynewsystemconstructionnecessarytopermitlive originationatsuchsiteandshallnotberequiredtoprovideend-userequipment.TheCity maydesignateadditionalliveprogrammingsites.TheCityshallpayanyadditional, actualconstructioncostspriortoadditionalconstructionandshallberesponsibleforthe provisionofend-userequipment.TDSmustensurethatthesystemmeetsthetechnical standardsattachedheretoasExhibitBatallliveoriginationsites.TDSmustfurther ensurethattheCitycan“narrowcast”programmingoriginatedfromallofthesites designatedpursuanttothisparagraphunlessTDSprovidessufficientchannelstoallow allservedareastoviewallprogrammedevents. e.PEGAccessCapitalSupport.InadditiontotherequirementsofSection 4.2(a)-(d)above,theCitymayrequireTDStocollectandremitaPEGCapitalFeeofup toeighty-fivecents($.85)persubscriber,permonthtosupportcommunityprogramming. TDSshallremitsuchpaymentsonthesamescheduleastheFranchiseFee.Allamounts paidshallbesubjecttoauditandrecomputationandacceptancethereofdoesnot constituteanaccordthatamountspaidarecorrect.TDSmustbenotifiedinwritingonor beforeOctober1stoftheamountofthePEGCapitalFeetobeeffectiveonJanuary1stof thefollowingyear.IftheCityfailstoprovidethewrittennotificationrequiredhereinby October1st,thenthePEGCapitalFeeforthefollowingcalendaryearshallremainasset thepreviousyear.TDSmayitemizeanyPEGCapitalFeeonsubscriber’sbills.Payment byTDSmustbeseparatefromandinadditiontoanyFranchiseFee.TheCity,TDSand othercablefranchiseesshalljointlyfundandsponsorasubscribersurveyapproximately duringthefifthandtenthyearsoftheFiberNetfranchiseforthepurposeofassessing subscribersatisfactionwithPEGAccessprogrammingandthelevelsoffinancialsupport thatsubscribersarewillingtoprovide.Uponcompletionofthesurvey,theCityandTDS shallmeettodiscussthelevelofsupportforPEGAccessprogrammingandenterinto goodfaithdiscussionsregardingrevisionstothisSectionthatmaybeappropriateinlight ofthesurvey. f.UseofPEGCapitalFee.TheCityandTDSagreethattheCitywill expendthePEGCapitalFeessolelyforcapitalcosts(consistentwithGAAP)associated withPEGAccess.HistoricallytheCityhasprovided,onanannualbasis,substantial financialsupportforPEGAccessprogramming.InconsiderationforTDS’sobligationto remitthePEGCapitalFee,theCityagreestoprovidefinancialsupportforPEGAccess thatisequivalenttotheamountofPEGCapitalFeescollectedandprovidedtotheCity. ByMarch31stofeachyear,theCityshallprovideTDSwithanannualreportofany expendituresofthePEGAccessCapitalFeetoinsuresuchfeesareusedforcapitalcosts relatedtoPEGAccess.TheannualreportshallalsodemonstratehowtheCityfulfilledits requirementtoprovidematchingsupportforPEGAccess.Basedonthereport,TDSmay sendawrittennoticetotheCityallegingthattheCityfailedtodemonstratethatthePEG CapitalFeewasusedforcapitalorthatmatchingPEGAccesssupportwasprovided.The Cityshallhavethirty(30)daysafterreceiptofthewrittennoticetoprovideadditional informationdemonstratingcompliancewiththerequirementsofthisSection.IfTDS continuestoallegethattheCityhasnotcompliedwithitsobligationsherein,TDSmay providewrittennoticeofitsintenttoreduceand/ordiscontinuecollectingandremitting ORDINANCENO.537 6 thePEGCapitalFee.IftheCitydisputesTDS’sactions,itmayinitiateanyenforcement actionundertheCableOrdinanceitdeemsappropriate. g.AccessRules.TheCitymayimplementrulesgoverningPEGAccess channelsandprogramming. h.ParityofObligations.TheCitywillimposeequivalentPEGAccess obligationsonanyotherfranchisedproviderofCableServiceintheCitytotheextent providedbylaw. Section4.3 DropsandServicetoPublicBuildings. a.TDSmustprovidemonthlyBasicCableServiceandCableProgramming Service(excludingpay-per-channelorpay-per-program)andinstallone(1)Dropandone (1)outletwithoutchargetothepublicinstitutionalsiteslistedinExhibitAattached hereto.TheprogrammingprovidedbyTDSisnotforpublicdisplay.TheCityshallhold TDSharmlessforanycopyright,orotherpenalties,incurredduetoimproperuseoffree service.TDSshallnotberequiredtoprovideconverters. b.TDSmustprovideaDrop,outletandBasicCableServiceandCable ProgrammingServicetosuchotheraccreditedpublicschoolsorpublicadministration buildingsastheCitymaysubsequentlydesignate,providedhowever,thatTDSshallonly berequiredtopaythecostofthefirstonehundredandfifty(150)feetofanynecessary CableSystemconstruction.TheCityorinstitutionshallpayanyadditionalactual constructioncost.TDSwillhaveareasonabletimefromthedesignationofadditional sitestocompleteextension.AdditionalDropsand/oroutletsatinstitutionallocations mustbeprovidedbyTDSatthecostofTDS’stimeandmaterial.Alternatively, institutionsmayaddoutletsattheirownexpense. Section4.4 DropBox.TDSmustmaintainalocaldropboxforreceivingsubscriber paymentsintheCity. SECTION5.ADMINISTRATIONPROVISIONS Section5.1 FranchiseFee. a.TDSshallpayaFranchiseFeetotheCityinanamountequaltofive percent(5%)ofitsgrossrevenues.TDSshallremitFranchiseFeepaymentstotheCity onaquarterlybasiswithin60daysofthecloseoftheprecedingcalendarquarter. Paymentsshallbebasedongrossrevenuesgeneratedduringtheprecedingquarter. b.EachFranchiseFeepaymentmustbeaccompaniedbyareportinform reasonablyacceptabletoCitydetailingthecomputationofthepayment.Allamountspaid aresubjecttoauditandrecomputationbytheCity,andacceptanceofanypaymentmust notbeconstruedasanaccordthattheamountpaidisinfactthecorrectamount.In accordancewithMinn.Stat.§541.05,anyactiontorecoverFranchiseFeesmustbe commencedwithinsix(6)yearsofreceiptoftheFranchiseFeepaymentorduedatefor suchpayment. ORDINANCENO.537 7 c.IntheeventthatanyFranchiseFeepaymentorrecomputedpaymentisnot madeonorbeforethedatesspecifiedherein,TDSshallpayaninterestcharge,computed fromsuchduedate,attheannualrateofonepercentovertheprimeinterestrate. Section5.2 RulesofTDS.TDSmaypromulgatesuchrules,termsandconditions governingtheconductofitsbusinessprovidedthatsuchrules,termsandconditionsmust notbeinconflictwiththeprovisionsofthisFranchise,theCableOrdinance,or applicablelawsorregulations. SECTION6.INDEMNIFICATION,INSURANCE,BONDSANDSECURITYFUND Section6.1 Indemnification.ByacceptanceofthisFranchise,TDSagreesto indemnify,defend,andholdtheCityharmlessinaccordancewiththeCableOrdinance. Section6.2 Insurance.AtthetimeofacceptanceofthisFranchise,TDSwillfilewith theCityaCertificateofInsuranceinaccordancewiththeCableOrdinance.TDSmust maintainsuchinsurancefortheentiretermofthisFranchise.TheinsuranceforTDSmay bepurchasedandmaintainedjointlywiththeCity’sotherinsurancecoverage. Section6.3 SecurityforPerformance. a.AtthetimeofacceptanceofthisFranchise,TDSshalldelivertoCitya performancebond,informandsubstanceacceptabletoCity,fromaNationalorState bankapprovedbyCity,intheamountof$50,000. b.TheperformancebondshallensureTDS’sfaithfulperformancein accordancewiththetermsofthisFranchise,theCableOrdinance,andapplicablelaws andregulations.AfterprovidingTDSwithnoticeandanopportunitytocurein accordancewithSection14oftheCableOrdinance,theCitymaydrawonthe performancebondintheeventTDSfailstocomplywithanylaw,ordinanceor regulation,tocompensatetheCityforanydamagesorlosssufferedbytheCityasa result,andfurtherguaranteeingpaymentbyTDSofclaims,liensandfeesduetheCity whicharise.IntheeventthisFranchiseisrevokedortherightshereunderrelinquishedor abandonedbyTDS,theCityisentitledtocollectanyresultantdamages,costsor liabilitiesincurredbytheCity. c.TheCityandTDSacknowledgethatitmaybedifficultorimpossibleto accuratelyquantifyactualdamagesorlossessufferedbytheCityduetoaviolationor unsatisfiedobligationunderthisFranchise,theCableOrdinance,orapplicablelawsor regulations.Suchviolationsorunsatisfiedobligationsmay,however,bepresumedto harmtheCityandthepublic’sinterest.Accordingly,theCitymay,initsreasonable discretion,collectliquidateddamagesinanamountofuptoTwoHundredandFifty Dollars($250.00)perviolationofanyprovisionofthisFranchise,theCableOrdinance, orapplicablelawsorregulations.Eachviolationmaybeconsideredaseparateviolation forwhichseparateliquidateddamagescanbeimposed. d.IntheeventtheCitywillmakeanyclaimagainstthefund,theCitymust complywithSection14oftheCableOrdinancegoverningenforcementofthisFranchise. ORDINANCENO.537 8 e.TheCity’srightshereinareinadditiontoallotherrightstheCitymay haveandtheCity’sexerciseofsuchrightsdoesnotconstituteanexclusiveremedynor limitanyotherright. Section6.4 ConstructionSecurity. a.TDSshallcomplywithMinnesotaStatutes§574.26whenundertakingany constructionprojectsorenteringintoanyconstructioncontracts.Anyperformanceor paymentbondsobtainedshallnametheCityofMonticelloaswellasTDS. b.IfTDSoranyofitscontractorsfailtoperforminaccordancewiththe termsofthisFranchise,theCableOrdinance,andapplicablelawsandregulations,the CitymaydrawontheperformancebondestablishedinSection6.3.IntheeventtheCity willmakeanyclaimagainsttheperformancebond,theCitymustcomplywithSection14 oftheCableOrdinancegoverningenforcementofthisFranchise. c.TheCity’srightspursuanttothisSectionareinadditiontoallotherrights theCitymayhave.Anyactionwithrespecttothesecurityfunddoesnotconstitutean exclusiveremedynorlimitanyotherright. SECTION7.MISCELLANEOUSREQUIREMENTS Section7.1 AmendmentofFranchiseOrdinance.TDSandtheCitymaymutually agree,fromtimetotime,toamendthisFranchise.Anychanges,modificationsor amendmentstothisFranchisemustbemadeinwriting,signedbytheCityandTDS. NothinghereinisintendedtoexpandordiminishtherightsgiventoCityunderstatelaw. TheCityreservesitslawfulrights,includingitspolicepowersandordinance-making authority. Section7.2 ForceMajeure.IntheeventTDS’sperformanceofthisFranchiseis preventedduetoacausebeyonditsreasonablecontrol,suchfailuretoperformmustbe excusedfortheperiodofsuchinabilitytoperform. Section7.3 Severability.Ifanyterm,conditionorprovisionofthisFranchiseorthe applicationthereoftoanypersonorcircumstanceisheld,toanyextent,invalid, preemptedorunenforceable,theremainderandalltheterms,provisionsandconditions hereinmust,inallotherrespects,continuetobeeffectiveprovidedthelossoftheinvalid, preemptedorunenforceableprovisionsdonotsubstantiallyaltertheagreementbetween theparties.Intheeventalaw,ruleorregulationissubsequentlyrepealed,rescinded, amendedorotherwisechangedsothattheFranchiseprovisionwhichhadbeenheld invalid,preemptedormodifiedisnolongerinconflicttherewith,suchFranchise provisionwillreturntofullforceandeffectandthereafterbebindinguponthirty(30) dayswrittennoticetoTDS. Section7.4 NonenforcementbyCity.TDSisnotrelievedofitsobligationsto complywiththisFranchiseortheCableOrdinanceduetoanyfailureordelayoftheCity toenforcepromptcompliance.TheCityandTDSmayeachonlywaiveitsrightsby expresslysostatinginwriting. ORDINANCENO.537 9 Section7.5 RightsCumulative.AlloftheCity’sandTDS’srightsandremedies pursuanttothisFranchiseareinadditiontoandnotexclusiveofanyandallotherrightsand remediesavailabletotheCityorTDS. Section7.6 WorkPerformedbyOthers.AllobligationsofthisFranchiseapplyto workperformedbyanyagent,subcontractororotherpersonperforminganyworkorserviceson behalfofTDSpursuanttothisFranchisetotheextentapplicable,however,innoeventwillany suchpersonobtainanyrightstomaintainandoperateaCableSystemorprovideCableService. Section7.7 EntireAgreement.ThisFranchisesetsforththeentireagreement betweenthepartiesrespectingthesubjectmatterhereof.Allagreements,covenants, representations,andwarranties,expressandimplied,oralandwritten,ofthepartieswithregard tothesubjectmatterhereofarecontainedherein.Nootheragreements,covenants, representationsorwarranties,expressorimplied,oralorwritten,havebeenmadebyanypartyto anotherwithrespecttothematterofthisFranchise.Allpriorandcontemporaneous conversations,negotiations,possibleandallegedagreements,representations,covenantsand warrantieswithrespecttothesubjectmatterhereofarewaived,mergedhereinandthereinand aresupersededherebyandthereby. Section7.8 TerminationandAbandonment.Notwithstandinganythingfoundin Sections11.2,11.3(d),14.1or14.2oftheCableOrdinance,TDSshallnotberequiredto removeitsTelecommunicationsNetworkortorelocatetheTelecommunicationsNetworkorany portionthereof,ortosellanyright,titleandinterestinitsTelecommunicationsNetworktothe City,asaresultofanytermination,revocationorforfeitureofthisFranchiseorabandonmentof theCableSystemprovidedtheCableSystemorTelecommunicationsNetworkisbeingusedoris usablebyTDSfortheprovisionofTelecommunicationsServicesorbroadbandservicesas definedbyapplicablestateandfederallaw.TDSshallhavetherighttoterminatethisFranchise uponninety(90)daysadvancewrittennoticetotheCity(“TerminationDate”)andanysuch terminationshallnotimpactTDSrighttocontinuetheprovisionofTelecommunicationsservices andbroadbandservicesovertheTelecommunicationsNetwork.IntheeventtheFranchiseis terminated,TDSshallberesponsibletoremitpaymenttotheCityuptotheTerminationDatefor allPEGfeesrequiredunderSection4.2andallfranchisefeesrequiredunderSection5.1.In addition,ifTDSentersintoanybindingcommitmentswithFiberNetorCharterCommunications fortheprovisionofadditionalPEGcapitalgrantsorPEGequipmentpurchasesnototherwise specifiedinthisFranchise,TDSwillhonorsuchcommitmentsmadepriortotheTermination Date. SECTION8.ACCEPTANCEOFFRANCHISE Section8.1 PublicationandEffectiveDate.ThisFranchisewillbeeffectiveonthe dateofacceptancebyTDS.ThisFranchiseshallbeenactedandpublishedinaccordancewith applicablelocalandMinnesotalaw. Section8.2 TimeforAcceptance. ORDINANCENO.537 10 a.TDSmustacceptthisFranchisewithinsixty(60)daysofenactmentbythe City,unlessthetimeforacceptanceisextendedbytheCity.AcceptancebyTDSwillbe deemedthegrantofthisFranchiseforallpurposes. b.UponacceptanceofthisFranchise,TDSandCitywillbeboundbyallthe terms,conditionsandobligationscontainedherein. Section8.3 MannerforAcceptance.TDSmustacceptthisFranchiseinthefollowing manner: a.TheFranchisemustbefullyexecutedandacknowledgedbyTDSand deliveredtotheCity. b.TDSmustalsodeliveranyconstructionbondandinsurancecertificates requiredhereinthathavenotpreviouslybeendelivered,withitsacceptance. Section8.4 FailuretoAccept.IntheeventTDSdoesnottimelyacceptthisFranchise inaccordancewiththerequirementsherein,thisFranchiseandallrightsgrantedhereinarenull andvoid. ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis26thofSeptember,2011. CITYOFMONTICELLO MayorClintHerbst ATTEST: CityAdministratorJeffO’Neill ACCEPTED:ThisFranchiseisacceptedandTDSMonticelloagreestobeboundbyits termsandconditions. BridgeWaterTelephoneCompanyd/b/a TDSTelecom Date:_______________,2011 Manager-VideoServices ORDINANCENO.537 11 EXHIBITA (LiveOriginationandFreeServiceSites) Monticello MunicipalLiquorStore545Hwy25Monticello55362Drop EllisonPark825EastRiverStreetMonticello55362Live/Drop SwanPark121MississippiDriveMonticello55362Live/Drop MonticelloPublicLibrary2006thStreetwestMonticello55362Live/Drop XcelBallfieldComplex2171W.RiverStreetMonticello55362Live/Drop SoccerPark5550SchoolBlvd.Monticello55362Live/Drop HockeyArena1000EastBroadwayMonticello55362Live/Drop CityHall/CommunityCenter505WalnutStreetMonticello55362Live/Drop HighSchool5225SchoolBlvd.Monticello55362Live/Drop ORDINANCENO.537 12 EXHIBITB (TechnicalStandards-LiveOriginationSites) WithrespecttoallsiteslistedinExhibitA,theCableSystemshallmeetorexceedthefollowing requirements: 1.TheCableSystemshalloperateinconformancewiththetechnicalstandardspromulgated bytheFCCpursuanttoTitle47,Sections76.601to76.617,asmaybeamendedor modifiedfromtimetotime. 2.TheCableSystemshallbecapableofcontinuous24-houroperationwithoutsignal degradation. 3.TheCableSystemshallbecapableofoperationwithoutfailure,materialperformance changesorsignaldegradationoveranoutdoortemperaturerangeof-40degreesFto +130degreesFandoveravariationinsupplyvoltagesfrom105to130voltsAC. 4.TheCableSystemwillprovideaccesschannelconnectionsuptothedemarcationpoint, bothupstreamanddownstream,withoutmaterialsignaldegradationordeteriorationand withsignalqualityequaltoorbetterthananyotherchannels.Materialsignaldegradation ordeteriorationwhereanysignalproblemincludingghostingorotheraudioorvisual distortionorinterferenceisapparentwithoutspecialtesting.TDSshallnotberesponsible fortechnicalproblemsderivingfromfacilitiesorequipmentlocatedbeyondthe demarcationpoint,withintheinstitutionalsite. SUMMARYORDINANCENO.537A CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA ANORDINANCEGRANTINGAFRANCHISETOBRIDGEWATERTELEPHONE COMPANY,LLC,DBATDSTELECOM,TOCONSTRUCT,OPERATEAND MAINTAINACABLESYSTEMANDPROVIDECABLESERVICE INTHECITYOFMONTICELLO,MINNESOTA NOTICEISHEREBYGIVEN that,onSeptember26,2011,OrdinanceNo.537wasadoptedby theCityCounciloftheCityofMonticello,Minnesota.DuetothelengthynatureofOrdinance No.537,thefollowingsummaryoftheordinancehasbeenpreparedforpublicationasauthorized bystatelaw: SECTION1.TheordinanceadoptedbytheCouncilgrantsafranchisetoBridgewater TelephoneCompanyLLC,d/b/aoroperatingasTDSTelecom,toconstruct, operateandmaintainacablesystemandprovidecableservicetoresidentsand businessesintheCityofMonticello,Minnesota. Inkeepingwiththestaterequirementthatnoagreementcanhavetermsand conditionsmorefavorableorlessburdensomethananexistingagreement,the Bridgewater/TDSTelecomCableFranchiseOrdinanceisalmostidenticaltothe CableFranchiseOrdinancesthatwereapprovedwithCharterCommunications andFiberNetMonticello.ThisdoesnotlimitTDSTelecomfromexceedingthe provisionsasstatedintheordinance. TheproposedordinanceoutlinestheabilityforBridgewater/TDSTelecomto buildacablesystemandoffercableservice,setsafranchisetermtoexpireMarch 29,2020,andestablishestheserviceareaasthecorporateboundariesoftheCity. Therearesectionsdescribingthesystemcapacity,communityservice programming,dropsandservicestopublicbuildings,andprovisionsrelatedto franchisefees. SECTION2.Thisordinanceshalltakeeffectandbeinfullforcefromandafteritspassageand publication.Aprintedcopyofthewholeordinanceisavailableforinspectionby anypersonduringtheCity’sregularofficehours,andisavailableonlineat www.ci.monticello.mn.us. APPROVEDFORPUBLICATIONBY theCityCounciloftheCityofMonticello,Minnesota, this26thdayofSeptember,2011. SUMMARYORDINANCENO.537A CITYOFMONTICELLO ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator VOTINGINFAVOR: VOTINGINOPPOSITION: CityCouncilAgenda:09/26/11 1 5E.ConsiderationofadoptingResolutionNo.2011-89orderingpreparationofassessment rollandcallingforanAssessmentHearingtoadoptassessmentsfor2011Street Reconstruction,CityProjectNo.11C001.(BW/WSB) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: Thepreliminaryassessmentrollsforthe2011StreetReconstructionproject,includingArea 4BandWestRiverStreet,mustbeupdatedtoreflectpreviousCouncilmotionsregarding coststobeassessed,includingtheconsiderationofusingactualconstructioncostsversus estimatedorbidcostsinadoptingfinalassessmentrates,aswellasassessmentsrequiredfor workperformedforprivatepropertyownersattheirrequest. InaccordancewithMinnesotaStatute429,inordertobondforthisprojecttheCityCouncil mustholdapublichearingpriortoawardingacontractforconstructionoftheimprovements. AhearingwasconductedonFebruary28,2011forArea4BandWestRiverStreet.TheCity Councilisalsorequiredtoconductanassessmenthearingatthecompletionoftheproject. WrightCountyrequiresthatassessmentsbecertifiedtotheCountyAuditorbytheendof Novemberforcollectiononnextyear’staxes.Thisdeadlinecanbemetbycallingforthe assessmenthearingtobeheldattheOctober24,2011CityCouncilmeeting.Byconducting theassessmenthearingonOctober24th,adequatetimeforpublicationandmailingofnotices willbeprovidedtosatisfytherequirementsforpublicimprovementprojectsinaccordance withMinnesotaStateStatutesChapter429. Constructionoftheprojectisnotyetcomplete.However,allactualconstructioncostswillbe calculatedandanyoutstandingprojectcostswillbeestimatedascloselyaspossiblepriorto thehearinginordertomeettheassessmenthearingdeadlinesperStateStatute. ThisprojectisinitiallybeingfundedthroughGeneralObligationbondswhichwillbepaid backthroughacombinationoffundingsourcesincludingstateaidfunds;streetreconstruction funds;stormsewer,sanitarysewerandwatertrunkfunds;andassessmentstoadjacent benefitingproperties. Benefitingresidentialpropertieswillbeassessedforstreetimprovementsusingflatratesfor eachproperty,regardlessofthesizeorlocationofthepropertyorthenumberofaccesses. TheresidentialassessmentratethatwaspreliminarilyapprovedbyCouncilwas$4,000per property,whichreflectsa5%increaseoverthe2010StreetReconstructionprojectassessment rateof$3,800.Benefitingnon-residentialpropertieswillbeassessedforstreetimprovements onafront-footbasis.Thenon-residentialratepreliminarilyapprovedbyCouncilwas$80per frontfootforstreetimprovementsand$12perfrontfootforsidewalkimprovements,which aretheCity’scurrentstandardnon-residentialrates. Uponapprovingthepreliminaryassessmentrates,Councilnotedthattheymaywishto considerreducingthefinalassessmentratesifconstructioncostscameinlowerthanthe engineer’sestimate.StaffplanstoaddressthiswithCouncilatthehearing. CityCouncilAgenda:09/26/11 2 Regardingnon-residentialrates,thepreliminaryrateof$80perfrontfoothasbeenusedon numerousprojectsinrecentyearssostaffbelievesthisrateisreasonable.However,because thisprojectreceivedfavorablebidsstaffwillreviewthisratebeforetheassessmenthearingto makesureitinfactremainsreasonable. TheimprovementsthatweremadetoWest7th StreetbetweenTH25andLocustStreetarenot beingassessedsoalthoughtheseimprovementswerepartofthe2011StreetReconstruction projecttheydonotrequireanassessmentrollandwillthereforenotbeaddressedduringthe publichearing. SeveralprivatepropertyownersrequestedtheCity’scontractortocompleteadditionalwork ontheirprivateutilityservicesand/ordrivewaysduringtheprojectatthepropertyowner’s expense.Whencontractorsareagreeabletothis,theCitytypicallyaccommodatessuch requestswhencompletingstreetreconstructionprojects,thereforetheextraworkwas completedasrequestedandthosepropertyownerswillbeassessed100%forthework.These costswillbeincludedinthefinalassessmentrollwhichwillbepresentedindetailduringthe AssessmentHearing. A1.BudgetImpact:TheCity’sshareoftheprojectfundingwilldependonthefinal assessmentratesapprovedbytheCityCouncil. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Impactstostaffworkloadwillbeminimal. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoadoptResolutionNo.2011-89declaringcoststobeassessed,ordering preparationofassessmentroll,andcallingfortheassessmenthearingforOctober24, 2011. 2.MotiontodenyadoptingResolutionNo.2011-89atthistime. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsthattheCouncilauthorizeAlternativeActionNo.1. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: ResolutionNo.2011-89 CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTIONNO.2011-89 ORDERINGPREPARATIONOFASSESSMENTROLLAND CALLINGFORASSESSMENTHEARING 2011STREETRECONSTRUCTION PROJECTNO.11C001 WHEREAS,contractshavebeenletforthereconstructionofArea4BincludingEastRiver StreetfromCedarStreettoapproximately1,100feeteastofWashingtonStreet,aswellasPalm, New,Wright,Ramsey,Hennepin,andWashingtonStreetsbetweenEastBroadway/CSAH75 andEastRiverStreet,andthereconstructionofpavedsurfacesinEllisonParkandEastBridge Park;andWestRiverStreet,westofWrightCSAH75;and NOWTHEREFOREBEITHEREBYRESOLVEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITY OFMONTICELLO,MINNESOTAASFOLLOWS: 1.TheCityCouncilherebydeterminesthataportionofthecostforsaidimprovementsshall beassessedagainstbenefittedpropertyownersbaseduponbenefitsreceivedwithout regardtocashvaluation. 2.TheCityAdministratorshallforthwithcalculatetheproperamounttobespecially assessedforsuchimprovementagainsteveryassessablelot,pieceorparcelofland withoutregardtocashvaluationasprovidedbylaw,andheshallfileacopyofsuch proposedassessmentinhisofficeforpublicinspection. 3.Ahearingshallbeheldonthe24th dayofOctober,2011at7p.m.attheMonticello CommunityCentertopassuponsuchproposedassessmentandatsuchtimeandplaceall personsowningpropertyaffectedbysuchimprovementwillbegivenanopportunityto beheardwithreferencetosuchassessment. 4.TheCityClerkisherebydirectedtocauseanoticeofthehearingontheproposed assessmenttobepublishedonceintheofficialnewspaperatleasttwoweekspriortothe hearingandshallstateinthenoticethetotalcostoftheimprovement.TheClerkshall alsocausemailednoticetobegiventotheownerofeachparceldescribedinthe assessmentrollnotlessthantwoweekspriortothehearing. 5.Theownerofanypropertysoassessedmay,atanytimepriortocertificationofthe assessmenttotheCountyAuditor,paythewholeoftheassessmentonsuchproperty, withinterestaccruedtothedateofpaymenttotheCity,exceptthatnointerestshallbe chargediftheentireassessmentispaidwithin30daysfromtheadoptionofthe assessment.SuchpaymentmustbemadebeforeNovember25th orinterestwillbe chargedthroughDecember31st ofthesucceedingyear.Insubsequentyears,theproperty ownermayatanytimethereafter,paytotheCitythebalanceoftheassessmentremaining unpaidafterthecurrentyear,providedsuchpaymentismadepriortoNovember15th. 6.TheCityClerkshallforthwithtransmitacertificationofthisassessmenttothecounty auditortobeextendedonthepropertytaxlistsofthecounty.Suchassessmentsshallbe collectedandpaidoverinthesamemannerasothermunicipaltaxes. ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis26th dayofSeptember,2011. CITYOFMONTICELLO ____________________________________ ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________________ JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator CityCouncilAgenda:9/26/11 1 5F.Considerationofapprovinganapplicationforanon-saleintoxicatingliquorand SundayliquorlicenseforCapitanPanchoVillaMexicanRestaurantat100West7th Street (CS) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: ICEnterprises,LLC,operatingasCapitanPanchoVillaMexicanRestaurant,has submittedanapplicationforanon-saleliquorlicenseandSundayliquorlicense.The businesswillbelocatedat100West7th Street,previouslyoccupiedbyGuadalajara’s.It isanticipatedthatthenewrestaurantwillopeninOctober2011. Priortoissuanceofthelicense,certainrequirementsmustbemet. Theannualfeefortheon-saleliquorlicenseissetat$3,750andtheSunday licenseat$200.ThesefeeswillbeproratedfromOctober2011throughJune 2012,andaretobepaidbeforealicensewouldbeissued.Wehavereceiveda checkintheamountof$2,962.50. Abackgroundcheckisrequiredtobeconductedonthebusinessownersbythe CityandtheWrightCountySheriff’sDepartment.TheCityhascompletedits backgroundcheckandwearewaitingtoreceivethepaperworkfromtheSheriff’s Office. Theownersmustacquirethenecessaryinsurancecoveringliquorliabilityand worker’scompensationasrequiredbystatelaw.TheCityiswaitingforthe appropriateinsurancecertificate,whichwillbesentafterapprovaloftheliquor application. TheCityrequiresverificationthatthebusinessmeetsqualificationstooperateasa fullrestaurant.Theywillbeprovidinguswithacopyoftherestaurantlicense issuedbytheMNDepartmentofHealth. AfterapprovalbyCouncilandsuccessfulcompletionoftherequirements,theapplication andappropriatedocumentationwillbesenttotheStateforprocessingandthelicensewill beissued. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Motiontoapprovetheapplicationforanon-saleliquorlicenseandSundayliquor licenseforICEnterprisesLLC,dbaCapitanPanchoVillaMexicanRestaurantat 100West7th Street,contingentuponreceivingallnecessarydocuments. 2.Motiontodenytheliquorlicenseapplicationatthistime. CityCouncilAgenda:9/26/11 2 C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CityStaffrecommendsAlternative#1forapprovaloftheapplicationforanon-sale liquorlicenseandSundayliquorlicenseforthenewownersoftherestaurantat100West 7th Street. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: CopyofLicenseApplication CityCouncilAgenda:9/26/11 1 5G.ConsiderationofapprovingawaiveroftheBuildingPlanReviewFeeforSuburban ManufacturinginaccordancewiththeBusinessExpansionIncentivePilotProgram (MB) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: TheCouncilauthorizedaBusinessExpansionIncentiveprograminJanuaryof2011. Theapprovedprogramstructureallowedforapplicantstoreceiveupto$5,000in buildingorplanningfeereductions.Theassistancewouldbeappliedonlytotheplan reviewcomponentofthebuildingpermitcost,planningapplication,ordemolition permits. Toqualifyfortheprogram,applicantsneedtobeanexistingbusinessseekingtoexpand attheircurrentlocationorexpandatanewlocationnMonticello.Theapplicantalso needstodemonstrateanabilitytomeetatleasttwoofthefollowingcriteria: 1.Createorretainjobs. 2.Redevelopment,expansion,orrenewalofexistingvacantunderutilized existingcommercialorindustrialproperties/buildings,includingoneofthe following: a)Increasebuildingsquarefootage b)Increasebuildingvaluation c)Increasedvisualappearanceorfunctionoffacility d)Productorserviceexpansion e)OccurswithintheCentralCommunityDistrict CityStaffreceivedanapplicationfromSuburbanManufacturingrequestingtoutilizethe businessexpansionincentiveprogramtoreceiveawaiverofthebuildingpermitplan reviewfee.Theapplicantsareproposingtoconstructa39,000squarefootmanufacturing facilityintheMonticelloBusinessCenter.Theapplicantisproposingtobegin constructioninOctoberandplanstomoveintothenewfacilitybyearlynextyear.The businessassistanceplanrequiresthecreationoffouradditionallivablewagejobsandto retaineightrecenthires(sinceApril)inMonticello. TheBuildingOfficialhasestimatedthebuildingpermitplanreviewfeeat$8,000.The BusinessExpansionIncentiveProgramGuidelineslimitsasinglewaiverto$5,000. A1.BudgetImpact:ThecurrentcashbalanceoftheBusinessExpansionaccountin theLiquorStoreFundis$18,964.UponapprovaloftheSuburbanManufacturing application,thefundbalancewillbe$13,964. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Staffworkloadrequirementsconsistedofwritingthe Councilstaffreport. CityCouncilAgenda:9/26/11 2 B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Motiontoapprovewaiving$5,000ofthebuildingplanreviewfeeforSuburban ManufacturingaspartoftheBusinessExpansionIncentivePilotProgram. 2.Motiontodenywaivingthebuildingpermitplanreviewfee. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: StaffrecommendsAlternative#1.Theproposedprojectmeetstheobjectivesofthe approvedBusinessExpansionIncentivePilotprogrambyaddingsquarefootage,creating additionaljobs,andincreasingbuildingvaluationinMonticello.Furthermore,theCity Councilhasapprovedpreviouswaiverrequests(Belde,Aroplax,DLLK,Monticello-Big LakePetHospital,LandmarkCenter,NAPA). D.SUPPORTINGDATA: BusinessExpansionIncentivePilotApplicationforSuburbanManufacturing CityCouncilAgenda:09/26/11 1 5H.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-90approvingfinalpaymenttoFuller ConcreteandMasonry,LLCandacceptingworkonthesecondCommon-Use DumpsterEnclosureinBlock35MunicipalParkingLot,CityProjectNo.10C008 (BW) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: TheBlock35MunicipalParkingLotCommon-UseDumpsterEnclosureImprovements consistoftwodumpsterenclosurestructureswithreinforcedconcreteslabs,masonry blockwalls,steel-framedwoodslatgates,andgabledsteelroofs. In2010thefirstdumpsterenclosurestructure(westsideoflot)wasconstructedbyFuller ConcreteandMasonry,exceptfortheroofwhichwasconstructedbystafffromPublic Works.Fulleralsoconstructedtheconcretebaseslabandgatepostsforthesecond dumpsterenclosurestructure(eastsideoflot)lastyear.Allthisworkwaspreviously paidfor. In2011CouncilauthorizedFullerConcreteandMasonrytocompletethesecond dumpsterenclosurestructurebyconstructingthemasonryblockwallsandfinishingthe gates.PublicWorksstaffwillagainconstructtheroofperCouncildirection. Fullerhascompletedallspecifiedworkontheseconddumpsterenclosureandhas submittedaninvoiceforfinalpaymentintheamountof$4,277.Constructionwas completedinaccordancewiththeconstructioncontractandstandardconstruction specifications. TheCityCouncilisthereforebeingrequestedtoaccepttheprojectascompleteand approvefinalpaymenttoFullerConcreteandMasonry,LLC,intheamountof$4,277. Thefollowingpaperworkwillneedtobesubmittedforfinalpaymenttobereleased: 1.FinalinvoiceandcompletedW-9; 2.Lienreleasesshowingsubcontractorshavebeenpaid; 3.IC134formsshowingthatthecontractorhascompliedwiththeprovisionsof MinnesotaStatutes290.92requiringwithholdingstateincometax. A1.BudgetImpact:Theseimprovementswillbepaidforthroughtheuseofspecial assessmentsintheformofsignedassessmentagreementswiththoseproperty ownerswhowishtousetheenclosures. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:StafffromtheEngineeringandPublicWorks Departmentswereimpactedbythisprojecttovaryingdegrees.Aswasnoted earlier,PublicWorksstaffstillneedstoconstructthesteelroofonthesecond enclosure. CityCouncilAgenda:09/26/11 2 B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2011-90acceptingtheimprovementsandapproving finalpaymentof$4,277toFullerConcreteandMasonry,LLCsubjecttoreceiptof finalpaperwork. 2.MotiontodenyadoptionofResolution#2011-90atthistime. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: StaffrecommendsapprovingAlternative#1. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Resolution#2011-90 CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTIONNO.2011-90 APPROVINGFINALPAYMENTANDACCEPTINGIMPROVEMENTSFOR SECONDCOMMON-USEDUMPSTERENCLOSUREINTHE BLOCK35MUNICIPALPARKINGLOT CITYPROJECTNO.10C008 WHEREAS,pursuanttoawrittencontractbetweentheCityofMonticelloandFullerConcreteand Masonry,LLCofMapleLake,Minnesota,thecontractorhassatisfactorilycompletedtheirworkon thesecondcommon-usedumpsterenclosureintheBlock35MunicipalParkingLotinaccordance withthecontract; NOWTHEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDBYTHECITYOFMONTICELLO,MINESOTA that theworkcompletedundersaidcontractisherebyacceptedandapprovedandthattheMayorandCity Clerkareherebydirectedtoissueaproperorderforthefinalpaymentonsuchcontractsubjectto receiptofthefollowing: 1)FinalinvoiceandcompletedW-9; 2)Lienreleasesshowingsubcontractorshavebeenpaid; 3)IC134formsshowingthatthecontractorhascompliedwiththeprovisionsofMinnesotaStatute 290.92requiringwithholdingstateincometax. ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis26thdayofSeptember,2011. CITYOFMONTICELLO ____________________________________ ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator CityCouncilAgenda:09/26/11 1 5I.ConsiderationofapprovinganamendmenttoConditionalUsePermitforPlanned UnitDevelopmentforLot1,Block2,CarconeAddition(103SandbergRoad); Applicant:WestMetroAutoDealership (AS) A.REFERENCE&BACKGROUND: ThePlanningCommissionheldapublichearingforthisrequestonSeptember20th, 2011.TheCommissionrecommendedapprovaloftheamendmenttoConditional UsePermitforPlannedUnitDevelopmentina3-0vote(2commissionerswere absent). Theapplicant’srepresentativewaspresentatthehearing.Nootherpublic testimonywastaken. Property:Legal:Lot1,Block2,CarconeAddition,Cityof Monticello Address:103SandbergRoad Thesubjectsiteislocatedinthesouthwestquadrantofthe intersectionareaofI-94andStateHighway25 PlanningCaseNumber:2011-026 Request(s):ConsiderationofanamendmenttoConditionalUsePermit forPlannedUnitDevelopmentfortheWestMetroAuto Dealership. DeadlineforDecision:November7th,2011 LandUseDesignation:PlacestoShop ZoningDesignation:B-3,HighwayBusiness Thepurposeofthe"B-3",HighwayBusinessdistrict, providesforandlimittheestablishmentofmotorvehicle orientedordependentcommercialandserviceactivities. CurrentSiteUse:Theprincipaluseofthe1.21acresiteisasanauto dealership. SurroundingLandUses: North:InterstateI-94 East:SecondparceloftheWestMetroAutodealership South:PlayhouseChildcare,adaytimechildcarefacility West:Vacant CityCouncilAgenda:09/26/11 2 ProjectDescription:TheapplicantisseekinganamendmenttotheexistingPlanned UnitDevelopmentfortheWestMetroAutodealershipsite,whichwouldaccommodate theadditionofaprivateaccessorycarwashfacilityonthewesternmostparcelofthe PUD. Analysis InAprilof2010,theCityapprovedareplattingandamendmenttoPUDfortheCarcone Addition.Thisactionconsolidatednineteen(19)propertieslocatednorthofChelsea Road,southofInterstate94,eastofMarvinRoadandwestofHighway25,andincluded thecurrentWestMetrosite. TheamendmenttoPUDextinguishedallpreviousCUPandPUDapprovalsforthe parcelsincludedwithintheplatduetonon-use,withtheexceptionofWestMetro.West Metro,anactivedealership,retaineditsPUDapproval,whichincludedallsiteusesand thesiteconfigurationasitexistedinApril,2010. Atthistime,WestMetroisseekingtoamendthePUDtoaccommodatetheadditionofa carwashfacilityalongthewesternelevationoftheirbuildinglocatedonLot1,Block2. Theusewouldbeaccessorytotheirprincipaluseasanautodealership. Inconsideringtherequest,staffhasnotedthatautomotivecarwashfacilitiesarenot listedasaseparatelyidentifiedaccessoryuseintheB-3district.Similarly,minorauto repairisnotlistedasanaccessoryuse.However,ifthiswereanewvehiclesales developmentrequest,aconditionalusepermitwouldberequiredintheB-3districtand thesetwocommonaccessoryusestovehiclesalesfacilitieswouldbereviewedwithinthe contextoftheCUPreview.Inthecaseofthisrequest,thestatusofthepropertyasan existingPUDrequiresthatanysubstantialmodificationtothepropertyorsiterequiresa formalamendmentandmayincludethisaccessoryuseconsideration. Thecarwashfacilityisproposedatapproximately1570squarefeet.Itwillbedeveloped alongthewest-facingelevationofthecurrentbuilding.Itisimportanttonotethatthis carwashisaprivatefacility,andwouldbeutilizedonlyforservicingvehiclesbeing servicedorsoldattheWestMetrodealership.Thecarwashwouldnotbeopentothe generalpublic. Theproposedadditionconsistsofconcreteblockconstruction,withglassblockwindows onthewestelevation.Theroofwillbeconstructedofmetalpanels.Thesematerialsand colorsoftheproposedstructureareconsistentwiththeexistingstructure. Anexistingsidewalkalongthewestelevationisproposedforremovalandthesiteplan doesnotillustrateitsreplacement.Thedriveaislefortheentranceandexittothecar washisproposedadjacenttoanexistingdriveaisleseparatingthebuildingfromthecar inventoryparkedalongthewestedgeoftheproperty. CityCouncilAgenda:09/26/11 3 Theapplicantisproposingnochangestothesitelandscaping,lighting,orsignagewith thisapplication. ThesouthernportionoftheWestMetrositeisadjacenttoacommercialchildcare facility.WiththeCarconereplatandamendment,additionallandscapingmaterialwas addedintheareabetweentheWestMetroandchildcaresites.Additionally,becausethis isaprivatecarwashuse,nomenuboardwithaudioisproposed.Therefore,staffisnot recommendinganyadditionallandscapebufferinginconjunctionwiththeexpansion. AgradinganddrainageplanisindevelopmentandwillbereviewedbytheCityEngineer isconjunctionwithabuildingpermitapplication. Forthepurposeofevaluatingtheproposedaddition,staffwouldalsoreferthe Commissiontothestandardsestablishedforprincipaluseautomotivecarwashfacilities asabaselineforreview.Asthisisaprivate-useaccessorycarwashfacility,manyofthe standardsarenotdirectlyapplicabletothisaccessoryuse. Magaziningorstackingspaceisconstructedtoaccommodatethatnumberof vehicleswhichcanbewashedduringamaximumthirty(30)minuteperiodand shallbesubjecttotheapprovaloftheCommunityDevelopmentDepartment. Notapplicable,privatewashfacility.Stackingareawillnotimpactrightofway. Whenabuttingaresidentialuse,thepropertyshallbescreenedwithatleasta semi-opaquebuffer(Table4-2,Buffer Type ―Cǁ) in accordance withsection 4.1(G)ofthisordinance. Notapplicable. AlllightingshallbeincompliancewithSection4.4ofthisordinance. Photometricplanrequiredatbuildingpermit. Parkingorcarmagazinestoragespaceshallbescreenedfromviewofabutting residentialdistrictsincompliancewithSection4.1(F)ofthisordinance. Notapplicable. Theentireareaotherthanoccupiedbythebuildingsorplantingsshallbesurfaced withmaterialwhichwillcontroldustanddrainagewhichissubjecttothe approvaloftheCommunityDevelopmentDepartment. Entireareaispavedtocontroldust. Theentireareashallhaveadrainagesystemwhichissubjecttotheapprovalof theCommunityDevelopmentDepartment. Gradinganddrainageplanarerequiredtobesubmittedatbuildingpermit. Vehicularaccesspointsshallbelimited,shallcreateaminimumofconflictwith throughtrafficmovement,andshallbesubjecttotheapprovaloftheCommunity DevelopmentDepartment.Accesspointstothecarwashareahavebeen previouslyset. CityCouncilAgenda:09/26/11 4 Allsigningandinformationalorvisualcommunicationdevicesshallbein compliancewithSection4.5ofthisordinance. Notapplicable,privatewashfacilityrequiresnoadditionalsignage. Provisionsaremadetocontrolandreducenoise. Notapplicable;privatewashrequiresnoexteriorcontrolboxwithvoice commands. Carwashfacilityshallhavedirectaccesstomajorthoroughfareviadrivewayor frontageroad.Compliant. Intermittentsoundsproducedbycarwashoperationsuchasthesoundofa vacuumorwarningsignalshallnotbeaudibletoadjoiningresidential. Assignedasaconditionalofapproval. A1.BudgetImpact:None. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:None. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoapprovetheamendmenttoConditionalUsePermitforPlannedUnit DevelopmentforWestMetroAutoDealership. 2.MotiontodenytheamendmenttoConditionalUsePermitforPlannedUnit DevelopmentbasedonfindingsoffacttobemadebytheCityCouncil. C.STAFFRECOMMNDATION: StaffrecommendsAlternative#1.ThePlanningCommissionrecommends Alternative#1above.Theproposedaccessorycarwashuseisconsistentwiththeintent ofthezoningdistrict,andconsistentwiththeusesintheexitingPlannedUnit Development.Theaccessoryuseisalsocompliantwiththeapplicableconditions assignedbytheMonticelloZoningOrdinanceforsuchaccessoryuses. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: A.PlanningCommissionResolution#2011-87 B.AerialParcelImage C.ApplicantNarrative D.SitePlan/Survey E.PlatReference F.BuildingElevations G.CarconePUDStaffReport–CityCouncil,April2010 H.B-3DistrictRegulations Z.ConditionsofApproval CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2011 –87 Date: September 20th, 2011 Resolution No. 2011-87 Motion By: Commissioner ___________ Seconded By: Commissioner _________________ A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR LOT 1, BLOCK 2, CARCONE ADDITION WHEREAS, West Metro Auto Dealership has requested an Amendment to Planned Unit Development for West Metro Auto Dealership, legally described as Lot 1, Block 2 of the Carcone Addition; and WHEREAS, in accordance with this application, the Planning Commission has found it appropriate to review the City’s previous approval of the Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for Amendment to Conditional Use Permit pursuant to the regulations of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 20th, 2011 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The application is consistent with the 2008 Monticello Comprehensive Plan for Places to Shop. 2. The applications are consistent with the Monticello Zoning Ordinances regulating the B-2 (Highway Business) District, the Planned Unit Development and Conditional Use Permit, subject to conditions as outlined. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: 1. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §462.357, the application for Amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development is hereby recommended to the City Council for approval. 2. The recommendation for approval is subject to those Conditions as follows: a) The proposed car wash shall be for the private use of West Metro Auto Dealership and shall not be made available for the use of the general public without approval of a new amendment to the Planned Unit Development. b) The entire area shall have a drainage system which is subject to the approval of the Community Development Department. c) All lighting shall be in compliance with Section 4.4 of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. d) Intermittent sounds produced by car wash operation such as the sound of a vacuum, dryer system, or warning signal shall not be audible to adjoining residential. ADOPTED this 20th day of September 2011, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION By: _______________________________ Rod Dragsten, Chair ATTEST: __________________________________ Angela Schumann, Community Development Director Planning Commission Agenda 4/7/10 1 5. Public Hearing: Consideration of a preliminary plat for Carcone Addition (formerly Monticello Ford). Applicant: Chrysler Financial (NAC) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Jacob Holdings, a parent/financial company of Denny Hecker, is seeking preliminary plat of nineteen (19) properties located north of Chelsea Road, south of Interstate 94, east of Marvin Road and west of Highway 25. These properties, referred to as the Carcone Addition, are comprised of West Metro Buick Pontiac GMC, the former Monticello Ford, the former Dunlo Motors (currently West Metro expansion site), and the former Monticello Ford sales/storage lot. The submitted preliminary plat indicates that the current 19 properties are proposed to be consolidated into four (4) properties. The properties are located in the B-3, Highway Business District and total approximately 14.17 acres. It should be noted that the Playhouse Child Care property located within this vicinity is not included in this preliminary plat. Previous applications have been processed with these properties throughout the past ten years including, but not limited to;  Planned unit development (PUD) approval,  Conditional use permits (CUP) for outdoor sales and car wash,  Variances to the sign ordinance, minimum building size requirements for auto sales, allow directional signage in the right-of-way  PUD amendments to allow off-site auto sales/storage lot, larger electronic signage, expansion of auto sales/storage lot  Interim use permit (IUP) to accommodate temporary automobile display and storage  IUP amendment for temporary automobile storage For the purposes of this preliminary plat, each proposed property is listed below with various development review criteria analyzed for each. In all cases, any existing internal drainage and utility easements shall be vacated to accommodate the proposed preliminary plat. This vacation is intended to be processed in a parallel action concurrent with the Final Plat. The proposed application indicates reestablishing one (1) thirty (30) foot drainage and utility corridor running east/west through Lot 2, Block 2 between Lot 1, Block 2 and the Playhouse Child Care facility and any easements at the property lines. In the material that follows, a summary of the site conditions on each of the four proposed parcels is provided. Following that, a consolidation of the issues to address as part of the Plat request is included as a part of the Alternative Actions section of the report. Planning Commission Agenda 4/7/10 2 I. Lot 1, Block 1 - PID: 155500113413, 2.3534 acres Sandberg South, Jacob Holdings, West Metro Buick Pontiac GMC Previously Comprised Of: (1) Portion of unplatted PID: 155500113413 General Comments: Property will continue to be accessed via two (2) ingress/egress points from Sandberg Road. One (1) access point will become shared with the property located directly south (former Monticello Ford). Shared access agreements must be coordinated between the two properties. Development Review B-3 Requirements Compliance B-3 Highway Business District New and used automobile sales permitted Compliant Currently utilized as used automobile sales. Parcel Size, Lot Coverage Percent, Minimum Building Size More than 2 acres to 4 acres, 10%, 10,000 s.f. Compliant 2.3534 acres, 12%, 11,940 s.f. building Lot Width 100 feet Compliant 410 feet Building Height 2 stories Compliant 1 story Setbacks Front Yard: 30 feet Side Yard: 10 feet Rear Yard: 30 feet Compliant Front Yard: 60.5 feet North Side Yard: 91.1 feet South Side Yard: 17.2 feet Rear Yard: 130 feet Off-Street Parking Required number for auto sales is dependent on percentage of office, sales space etc. Submitted plans do not detail building configuration for parking calculations. Landscaping Minimum of one (1) internal landscaped area/island delineator for each 5,000 s.f. of off street parking; such island must measure 180 s.f. (one parking space). Buffer yards not required in adjacent commercial uses. Submitted plans do not detail parking configurations. Signage Total Area of all Signs: Total area of all signs shall not exceed 15% of the total building façade fronting not more than 2 public streets. Allowable Sandberg Frontage: 122‟ x 20‟ = 2,440 s.f. I-94 Frontage: 190‟ x 20‟ = 3,800 s.f. Highway 25 Frontage: 60‟ x 20‟ s.f. = 1,200 s.f. Total x 15% = 1,116 s.f. (1) Freestanding (pylon) sign per lot, not exceeding 100 s.f. each side, max height 22 feet. (in the Freeway Corridor – freestanding sign may not exceed 200 s.f. each side with a max height of 32 feet) (1) Changeable copy sign allowed, not to exceed 25% of allowable sign area or 50 s.f. whichever is less. Wall, canopy or marquee signs shall be consistent with total area of all signs above. Non-Compliant Existing Total Area of all Signs (with known measurements): 1,345 s.f (1) Two sided 30‟ (? Documents state 38 or 36‟) high, 16‟ x 16‟ (256 s.f. each side) pylon located south of I-94 and west of Highway 25 at the northeast corner of the property; “Buick Pontiac GMC West Metro GM” Variance requested previously (1) Two sided 2‟ x 4‟(8 s.f. each side) illuminated directional off-premise sign located on the northeast corner of Sandberg and Chelsea Roads; “West Metro Buick Pontiac GMC (arrow) Red White Blue Building” Variance requested previously (1) Two sided 2‟ x 4‟ (8 s.f. each side) directional sign “West Metro Sales and Service (arrow)” Variance requested previously (1) Two sided 2‟ x 4‟ (8 s.f. each side) directional sign “West Metro Buick Pontiac GMC (arrow)” Variance requested previously (1) 5‟ x 25‟ (125 s.f.) wall banner located on the principle building; “West Metro Sales and Service” (1) Bay window signage, measurements unknown; Planning Commission Agenda 4/7/10 3 Signage (cont’d) “We service all makes and models. Hours open 7-7 M-F 7-3 S” (1) Car wash wall signage; “Car Wash” 2‟ x 12‟ (24 s.f) (1) Marquee; “Buick, Pontiac and GMC logos” 25‟ x 18‟ (450 s.f.) (1) Marquee; “West Metro” 10‟ x 25‟ (250 s.f.) (1) Wall signage; “West Metro” 2‟ x 10‟ (20 s.f.) (1) Wall signage; “West Metro” 2‟ x 16‟ (32 s.f.) (1) Wall signage; “ Service” 1‟ x 8‟ (8 s.f.) (3) Wall signage; “Buick Pontiac GMC” 2‟ x 10‟ total (20 s.f.) (1) Changeable copy sign, currently reading; “3.9 60 mo. OAC on all GM certified G6S 763-271-7800” 8‟x 12‟ (96 s.f.) (1) Portable sign (signage printed on van), unknown measurements, currently reading; “We service all makes & models. We‟ll meet or beat anyone‟s sale‟s or service price. Free loaners 763- 271-7800. Ser Hrs. 7-7 M-F Sat 7-3. II. Lot 2, Block 1 - PID: 155027001010, 4.2947 acres Sandberg South, Jacob Holdings, former Monticello Ford Previously Comprised Of: (1) Portion of unplatted - PID: 155500113413 (2) Outlot C – PID: 155051000030 (Plaza Partners) (3) Lot 1, Block 1 – PID: 155027001010 (Sandberg South) (4) Lot 2, Block 1 – PID: 155027001020 (Sandberg South) (5) Part of Lot 3, Block 1 – PID: 155027001032 (Sandberg South) General Comments: Although currently vacant, it is assumed that the property will continue to be accessed via two (2) ingress/egress points from Sandberg Road. One (1) access point will become shared with the property located directly north (West Metro Buick Pontiac GMC). Shared access agreements must be coordinated between the two properties. Development Review B-3 Requirements Compliance B-3 Highway Business District New and used automobile sales permitted Compliant Formerly utilized as automobile sales. Parcel Size, Lot Coverage Percent, Minimum Building Size More than 4 acres, 15%, 40,000 s.f. Compliant 4.2947 acres, 19%, 35,199 s.f. building , plus mezzanine Minimum building size meets the district requirements when mezzanine square footage is considered. Lot Width 100 feet Compliant 630 feet Building Height 2 stories Compliant 1 story Setbacks Front Yard: 30 feet Side Yard: 10 feet Rear Yard: 30 feet Compliant Front Yard: 29.8 feet (rounded to 30) North Side Yard: 11.5 feet South Side Yard: 410 feet Planning Commission Agenda 4/7/10 4 Rear Yard: 60.9 feet Off-Street Parking Required number for auto sales is dependent on percentage of office, sales space etc. Submitted plans do not detail building configuration for parking calculations. Landscaping Minimum of one (1) internal landscaped area/island delineator for each 5,000 s.f. of off street parking; such island must measure 180 s.f. (one parking space). Submitted plans do not detail parking configurations. Signage Total Area of all Signs: Total area of all signs shall not exceed 15% of the total building façade fronting not more than 2 public streets. Allowable Sandberg Frontage: 184‟ x 30‟ = 5,520 s.f. Chelsea Frontage: 180 „ x 30‟ = 5,400 s.f. Highway 25 Frontage: 168 x 30‟ s.f. = 5,040 Total x 15% = 2,394 s.f. Wall, canopy or marquee signs shall be consistent with total area of all signs above. Compliant Total Area of all Signs (with known measurements): 260 s.f. (2) Wall signage; “Monticello” 3‟ x 30‟ each (180 s.f.) (1) Wall signage; “Monticello” 2‟ x 20‟ (40 s.f.) (1) Wall signage; Showroom/Delivery” 2‟ x 10‟ (20 s.f.) (2) Wall signage; “Service” 2‟ x 10‟ total (20 s.f.) III. Lot 1, Block 2 - PID: 155051002010, 1.2102 acres Plaza Partners, Jacob Holdings, the former Dunlo Motors (currently West Metro expansion site) Previously Comprised Of: (6) Lot 1, Block 2 – PID: 155051002010 (Plaza Partners) General Comments: Property will continue to be accessed via two ingress/egress points from Sandberg Road. One (1) access point directly south of the building, will be entirely accessed via Lot 2, Block 2 (former Monticello Ford Sales/Storage Lot). Shared access agreements must be coordinated between the two properties. Of worth note, Ordinance does not require any buffering/screening between adjacent commercial land uses. Development Review Requirements Compliance B-3 Highway Business District New and used automobile sales permitted Compliant Currently utilized as used automobile sales. Parcel Size, Lot Coverage Percent, Minimum Building Size Up to 2 acres, 5%, 2,500 s.f. Compliant 1.2102 acres, 5%, 2,444 s.f. building Lot Width 100 feet Compliant 265 feet Building Height 2 stories Compliant 1 story Setbacks Front Yard: 30 feet Side Yard: 10 feet Rear Yard: 30 feet Compliant Front Yard: 37.2 feet West Side Yard: 70 feet East Side Yard: 65.6 feet Rear Yard: 110 feet Off-Street Parking Required number for auto sales is dependent on percentage of office, sales space etc. Submitted plans do not detail building configuration for parking calculations. Landscaping Minimum of one (1) internal landscaped area/island delineator Submitted plans do not detail parking configurations. Planning Commission Agenda 4/7/10 5 for each 5,000 s.f. of off street parking; such island must measure 180 s.f. (one parking space). Buffer yards not required in adjacent commercial uses. Principal Issue: Required buffer at south property boundary adjacent to Daycare business not in place. Signage Signage (cont’d) Total Area of all Signs: Total area of all signs shall not exceed 15% of the total building façade fronting not more than 2 public streets. Allowable Sandberg Frontage: 77‟ x 21‟ = 1,611s.f. I-94 Frontage: 30„ x 21‟ = 630 s.f. Total x 15% = 336 s.f. (1) Freestanding (pylon) sign per lot, not exceeding 100 s.f. each side, max height 22 feet. (in the Freeway Corridor – freestanding sign may not exceed 200 s.f. each side with a max height of 32 feet) (1) Changeable copy sign allowed, not to exceed 25% of allowable sign area or 50 s.f. whichever is less. Wall, canopy or marquee signs shall be consistent with total area of all signs above. Compliant Total Area of all Signs (with known measurements): 328 s.f. (1) Two sided 30‟ (? Documents state 38 or 36‟) high, 16‟ x 16‟ (256 s.f. each side) pylon located south of I-94 and west of Sandberg Road at the northwest corner of the property; “GM Certified Used Vehicles West Metro GM” (1) Wall signage; “West Metro” 6‟ x 12‟ (72 s.f.) IV. Lot 2, Block 2 - PID: 155051000020, 6.3094 acres Plaza Partners, Jacob Holdings, former Monticello Ford Sales/Storage Lot Previously Comprised Of: (7) Outlot A – PID: 155051000010 (8) Outlot B – PID: 155051000020 (Plaza Partners) (9) Lot 1, Block 1 – PID: 155051001010 (Plaza Partners) (10) Lot 1, Block 2 – PID: 155051002010 (Plaza Partners) (11) Lot 1, Block 3 – PID: 155051003010 (Plaza Partners) (12) Lot 2, Block 3 – PID: 155051003020 (Plaza Partners) (13) Lot 3, Block 3 – PID: 155051003030 (Plaza Partners) (14) Lot 4, Block 3 – PID: 155051003040 (Plaza Partners) (15) Lot 5, Block 3 – PID: 155051003050 (Plaza Partners) (16) Lot 6, Block 3 – PID: 155051003060 (Plaza Partners) (17) Lot 7, Block 3 – PID: 155051003070 (Plaza Partners) (18) Lot 8, Block 3 – PID: 155051003080 (Plaza Partners) (19) Lot 9, Block 3 – PID: 155051003090 (Plaza Partners) (19) Lot 10, Block 3 – PID: 155051003100 (Plaza Partners) Development Review Requirements Compliance B-3 Highway Business District Outdoor storage CUP Compliant Formerly utilized as outdoor auto storage lot. Parcel Size, Lot Coverage Percent, Minimum Building More than 4 acres, 15%, 40,000 s.f. N/A – No principle building 6.3094, no building Planning Commission Agenda 4/7/10 6 Size Lot Width 100 feet Compliant 300.98 feet Building Height 2 stories N/A Setbacks Front Yard: 30 feet Side Yard: 10 feet Rear Yard: 30 feet N/A Off-Street Parking N/A N/A Landscaping Minimum of one (1) internal landscaped area/island delineator for each 5,000 s.f. of off street parking; such island must measure 180 s.f. (one parking space). Buffer yards not required in adjacent commercial uses. N/A Signage Total Area of all Signs: Total area of all signs shall not exceed 15% of the total building façade fronting not more than 2 public streets. No principle building to base measurements from. Total Area of all Signs (with known measurements): 24 s.f. (1) Directional signage; “Ford Factory Authorized Sales Event on Now (arrow), 2‟ x 4‟ (8 s.f.) (1) Directional signage; “Fresh…..Used Cars & Trucks,” 2‟ x 4 (8 s.f.) (1) Directional signage; “As-Is Row Wholesale Lot,” 2‟ x 4 (8 s.f.)‟ Summary of Issues to Resolve: Lot 1, Block 1 (Main Metro West site):  Signage reduction to meet code by 229 square feet, including removal of nonconforming temporary signage. (Removal of 125 square foot banner, 96 square foot changeable copy temp sign, temporary signage on display van, and one 8 square foot directional sign would create compliance on this parcel).  Requires cross access easement under PUD Amendment with Lot 2, Block 1. Lot 2, Block 1 (Former Ford site):  No zoning compliance issues.  Requires cross access easement under PUD Amendment with Lot 1, Block 1.  Will require future PUD Amendment and/or Conditional Use Permit(s) to reinstate use of the property as previous approvals have lapsed. Lot 1, Block 2 (Sandberg Road West Metro site):  Requires reinstatement of landscape buffer at southern boundary, or PUD Amendment to resolve previous requirements for buffering with abutting Daycare property.  Requires cross access easement by Conditional Use Permit or PUD with Lot 2, Block 2. Lot 2, Block2 (Former Ford storage lot site):  No zoning compliance issues. Planning Commission Agenda 4/7/10 7  Requires cross access easement by Conditional Use Permit of PUD with Lot 1, Block 2.  Will require future PUD Amendment and/or Conditional Use Permit(s) to reinstate use of the property as previous approvals have lapsed. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision 1. Preliminary Plat for Carcone Addition and Amendment to Planned Unit Development approval. 1. Motion to recommend approval of Preliminary Plat of the Carcone Addition for Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1 and Lots 1 and 2 of Block 2, along with an amendment to the Planned Unit Development permits for the subject parcels, with one of the following options. Each of the approval options would include the incorporation of the conditions listed in Exhibit Z. a. Approve preliminary plat and PUD amendment, and bring all signage into compliance, as well as the previously required buffering adjacent to the Daycare building as noted above. b. Approve the preliminary plat and PUD amendment, incorporating all of the existing signage and current site conditions into the revised PUD approval. c. Approve the preliminary plat and PUD amendment, requiring compliance with signage and site conditions as enumerated by the Planning Commission following the public hearing. 2. Motion to recommend denial of the preliminary plat of the Carcone Addition for Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1 and Lots 1 and 2 of Block 2, due findings to be identified following the public hearing. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Planning staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat and PUD Amendment under Option 1.a. above, specifying that existing signage be brought into conformance with the current sign regulations, and reinstatement of the required landscaped buffer between the Sandberg Road expansion site of West Metro and the Daycare building. It appears from staff’s review of the available file information that a significant amount of signage has been added to the site, including temporary signage, that was not part of any previous PUD approval. Since the time of the last approval, the City has revised its Sign regulations to increase flexibility for business signage in the area. As such, the removal of temporary signage and a current banner would be very close to meeting the current requirements. It should be noted that these estimates are based on the staff’s analysis of the available submissions by the applicant, which do not Planning Commission Agenda 4/7/10 8 include detailed site plan conditions nor detailed architectural dimensions. Planning staff’s recommendation includes the incorporation of the additional conditions stated in Exhibit Z. The Planning Commission should choose between Options 1.a., 1.b., or 1.c. if a recommendation of approval is the preferred course of action. If Option 1.c. is chosen, a specific list as to which improvements are or are not required should be made. If a denial recommendation is forthcoming under Option 2, the Planning Commission should specify its Findings of Fact supporting the denial recommendation. SUPPORTING DATA Exhibit A: Existing Site Conditions Survey Exhibit B: Proposed Preliminary Plat Exhibit C: Supplemental Plat w/Additional Drainage & Utility Detail Exhibit D: Summary of Previous Applications and Approvals Exhibit E: Site Photos Exhibit Z: Conditions of Approval for Carcone Addition Planning Commission Agenda 4/7/10 9 Exhibit Z – Conditions of Approval Carcone Addition Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Amendment 1. The applicant enters into a Development Agreement specifying the current and approved conditions relating to site plans, signage, and other details mentioned in the staff reports. 2. Conditions of the City Engineering staff are incorporated into the approval. 3. Previous approvals for Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permits, and other zoning approvals are extinguished, requiring submission of new applications for future changes as required by ordinance on all lots in the plat. 4. Existing easements for utilities and drainage are vacated by separate document no later than at the time of final plat approval. 5. A landscape plan is submitted for City approval relating to any required buffer installation as noted in the staff report. 6. Cross access easements are prepared and filed no later than at the time of final plat as noted in this report. CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS Section 3.5 Business Base Zoning Districts Subsection (E) B-3: Highway Business District City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 107 (E) B-3: Highway Business District Section 3.5 (E) B-3 Highway Business District The purpose of the ―B-3‖ highway business district is to provide for and limit the establishment of motor vehicle oriented or dependent commercial and service activities. Base Lot Area  No minimum Base Lot Width  Minimum = 100 ft. Typical B-3 Building Types Typical B-3 Lot Configuration CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS Section 3.5 Business Base Zoning Districts Subsection (E) B-3: Highway Business District Page 108 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance TABLE 3-12: B-3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS REQUIRED YARDS (in feet) Max Height (stories / feet) Max Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Max Impervious (% of gross lot area) Front Interior Side Street Side Rear All Uses 30 10 20 30 2 stories 30 feet [1] (Reserved) (Reserved) [1]: Multi-story buildings may be allowed as a conditional use pursuant to Section 2.4(D) contingent upon strict adherence to fire safety code provisions as specified by the International Building Code as adopted in Title 4, Chapter 1 of the Monticello City Code. Accessory Structures  See Section 5.3(B) for all general standards and limitations on accessory structures. Other Regulations to Consult (not all inclusive)  Section 3.3, Common District Requirements  Section 3.5(B), Standards Applicable to All Business Base Zoning Districts  Section 4.1, Landscaping and Screening Standards  Section 4.5, Signs  Section 4.8, Off-Street Parking  Section 4.9, Off-Street Loading  Section 4.11, Building Materials 1 ExhibitZ–ConditionsofApproval Lot1,Block2,CarconeAddition(103SandbergRoad) Applicant:WestMetroAutoDealership 1.TheproposedcarwashshallbefortheprivateuseofWestMetroAutoDealershipand shallnotbemadeavailablefortheuseofthegeneralpublicwithoutapprovalofanew amendmenttothePlannedUnitDevelopment. 2.Theentireareashallhaveadrainagesystemwhichissubjecttotheapprovalofthe CommunityDevelopmentDepartment. 3.AlllightingshallbeincompliancewithSection4.4oftheMonticelloZoningOrdinance. 4.Intermittentsoundsproducedbycarwashoperationsuchasthesoundofavacuum,dryer system,orwarningsignalshallnotbeaudibletoadjoiningresidential. CityCouncilAgenda:09/26/11 1 5J.ConsiderationtoapproveaplatcorrectionforMorningGlory.(AS) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: InworkingwithahomeownerwithintheMorningGlorytownhomedevelopmentona propertysale,atitlecompanydiscoveredthattheaddressingofthepropertiesdidnotmatch thelegaldescriptionoftheproperties.Inshort,theeasternrowoftownhomeaddresseswere backwardfromtherecordlegaldescriptions.Thisissueresultedfromachangeinsurvey firmsbetweenthetimeofpreliminaryplatandfinalplat.Thesurveyoressentiallyflippedthe lotnumbersontheeasternrowofunits.Thischangecanbeclearlyseenontheplat documents. Unfortunatelyforthehomeowner,theyareunabletocloseontheirpropertysaleuntilthis discrepancyiscorrected.Thepropertyaddresshastomatchtheproperlegaldescription. Tocorrecttheissue,theCountySurveyor’sofficehascoordinatedworkwithBonestrooto developaplatcorrection.Councilissimplyaskedtoapprovetheplatcorrectionatthistime. TheDeputyCityClerkmayrecommendafollow-upresolution,whichmaybeprocessedina subsequentagenda. AllotherworkwilloccurattheprivateandCountyleveltocorrectlegaldescriptions.The addresseswillremainunchanged. A1.BudgetImpact:None. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Asmallamountofstafftimehasbeeninvolvedinhelping theCountyidentifytheissueanddeterminequickestprocessforcorrection. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoapproveaplatcorrectionfortheplatofMorningGlory. 2.MotiontodenyaplatcorrectionfortheplatofMorningGlory. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: 1.PreliminaryplatofMorningGlory 2.FinalPlatofMorningGlory 3.PlatCorrectionDocument(Tobeprovidedunderseparatecover) CityCouncilAgenda:09/26/11 1 7.PublicHearing-Considerationofcancellingapublichearingamendingthebudgetplan forTaxIncrementFinancingDistrictNo.1-5 (MBL) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: TIFDistrict1-5issettodecertifyin2012.Thedistricthasavailablesurplusfundsthatthe CityandEDAshouldconsiderutilizingforappropriateeconomicdevelopmentpurposesprior todecertification.Inanattempttobegintheprocesstoutilizethesefundsapublichearing noticewaspublishintheMonticelloTimes.Unfortunately,thenoticedidnothavetheexact wordingrequiredbystatute.ThereforeatthistimestaffisrequestingtheCityCouncilcancel thepublichearingandnotethatanewhearingwillbecalledatalaterdate. A1.BudgetImpact:NA A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:NA B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Motiontocancelthepublichearingatthistime. 2.Motiontocontinuethepublichearing. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1.Thecorrectpublichearingnoticewillbepublishedat afuturedate. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: none CityCouncilAgenda:09/26/11 1 8.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-91approvingthesaleofG.O. RefundingBonds,Series2011A (TK/Ehlers) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: AttheAugust22,2011meeting,Counciladoptedaresolutioncallingforthesaleof GeneralObligationRefundingBonds,Series2011A.Thepurposeofthebondsisto refundtheCity’sG.O.Bonds,Series2005A,whichiscallableonFebruary1,2014.The Citywouldbedoingwhatisreferredtoasanadvancerefundingtotakeadvantageofthe lowinterestrates. TheCityusedEhlers&Associates,Inc.asFinancialAdvisorstohelpissuethisbond sale.Ehlers&Associates,Inc.issuedtheOfficialStatementonbehalfoftheCityand workedwiththeCitytoobtainabondratingfromMoody’sInvestorServices.Thefirst fewpagesoftheOfficialStatementareattachedastheypertaintothebondissue.Acopy ofthefullOfficialStatementisavailablebyrequesttothefinancedepartment. OnSeptember19,2011,therewasaratingcallwithMoody’s,sothatMoody’scould issueabondratingfortheRefundingBonds,Series2011Abasedoncurrentfinancial, economic,andmanagementconditions.Moody’sratingswillbeprovidedatMonday night’smeeting. Proposalsforthesaleofthesebondswillbeopenedat10a.m.onSeptember26th andthe resultswillbepresentedtoCouncilthatnightattheCouncilmeetingbyMr.ToddHagen ofEhlers&Associates,Inc.Councilwillthenbeaskedtoapprovetheattached resolutionapprovingthesaleoftheG.O.RefundingBondsortorejectallproposals. A1.BudgetImpact:Byissuingbondstofinancetherefundingofthe2005Abond, theCitywillsavetheCityaround$598,000ininterestcostsover10years beginningin2014. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Therewouldbelittletonoimpactonthestaff. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS 1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2011-91approvingthesaleof$11,005,000G.O. RefundingBonds,Series2011A. 2.Donotadopttheresolutionapprovingthesaleof$11,005,000G.O.Refunding Bonds,Series2011A. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: TheCitystaffsupportsAlternative1. CityCouncilAgenda:09/26/11 2 D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Resolution#2011-91 Moody’sRatingComments(handoutatthemeeting) CopiesfromtheOfficialStatement 392123v1MNIMN190-140 ExtractofMinutesofMeeting oftheCityCounciloftheCityof Monticello,WrightCounty,Minnesota Pursuanttoduecallandnoticethereof,aregularmeetingoftheCityCounciloftheCityof Monticello,Minnesota,wasdulyheldintheCityHallinsaidCityonMonday,September26,2011, commencingat7:00P.M. Thefollowingmemberswerepresent: andthefollowingwereabsent: ********* TheMayorannouncedthatthenextorderofbusinesswasconsiderationoftheproposals whichhadbeenreceivedforthepurchaseoftheCity’sapproximately$11,005,000General ObligationRefundingBonds,Series2011A. TheCityAdministratorpresentedatabulationoftheproposalsthathadbeenreceivedinthe mannerspecifiedintheOfficialTermsofProposalfortheBonds.Theproposalsareassetforthin EXHIBITAattached. Afterdueconsiderationoftheproposals,Member____________________thenintroduced thefollowingresolution,andmoveditsadoption: InaccordancewiththeofficialTermsofProposalthefollowingadjustmentsweremade: PrincipalAmount: Maturities: MinimumPurchasePrice: 392123v1MNIMN190-140 2 RESOLUTIONNO.2011-91 ARESOLUTIONAWARDINGTHESALEOF$_________GENERAL OBLIGATIONREFUNDINGBONDS,SERIES2011A; FIXINGTHEIRFORMANDSPECIFICATIONS; DIRECTINGTHEIREXECUTIONANDDELIVERY; PROVIDINGFORTHEIRPAYMENT;PROVIDINGFORTHE ESCROWINGANDINVESTMENTOFTHEPROCEEDSTHEREOF; ANDPROVIDINGFORTHEREDEMPTIONOF BONDSREFUNDEDTHEREBY. BEITRESOLVEDBytheCityCounciloftheCityofMonticello,WrightCounty, Minnesota(the“City”)asfollows: Section1.SaleofBonds. 1.01.Itisherebydeterminedthat: (a)theCityisauthorizedbytheprovisionsofMinnesotaStatutes,Chapter 475(the“Act”)andSection475.67,Subdivision13oftheActtoissueandsellitsgeneral obligationbondstorefundoutstandingbondswhendeterminedbytheCityCounciltobe necessaryanddesirable; (b)itisnecessaryanddesirablethattheCityissueapproximately$11,005,000 GeneralObligationRefundingBonds,Series2011A(the“Bonds”)torefundinadvance ofmaturityandattheirredemptiondate,certainoutstandinggeneralobligationsofthe City; (c)theoutstandingbondstoberefunded(the“RefundedBonds”)consistof the$25,150,000GeneralObligationBonds,Series2005A,datedAugust17,2005,of which$10,690,000inprincipalamountiscallableonFebruary1,2013. 1.02.Theproposalof________________________________________(the“Purchaser”) topurchasetheBondsintheaggregateprincipalamountof$____________,asdescribedinthe OfficialTermsofProposalthereof,isdeterminedtobeareasonableofferandisaccepted,the proposalbeingtopurchasetheBondsatapriceof$____________plusaccruedinteresttodateof delivery,forBondsbearinginterestasfollows: 392123v1MNIMN190-140 3 YearInterestRateYearInterestRate 20142019 20152020 20162021 20172022 20182023 Trueinterestcost:_________ 1.03.Thesumof$___________beingtheamountproposedbythePurchaserinexcessof $________________iscreditedtotheEscrowAccounthereinaftercreated,ordesignatedtopay costsofissuanceoftheBonds,asmayberecommendedbythefinancialadvisorstotheCity.The CityAdministratorisdirectedtoretainthegoodfaithcheckofthePurchaser,pendingcompletionof thesaleoftheBonds,andtoreturnthegoodfaithchecksoftheunsuccessfulproposers.TheMayor andCityAdministratoraredirectedtoexecuteacontractwiththePurchaseronbehalfoftheCity. 1.04.TheCitywillforthwithissueandselltheBondspursuanttoMinnesotaStatutes, Chapter475(the“Act”)inthetotalprincipalamountof$_______________,originallydated October19,2011,inthedenominationof$5,000eachoranyintegralmultiplethereof,numbered No.R-1,upward,bearinginterestasabovesetforth,andmaturingseriallyonFebruary1inthe yearsandamountsasfollows: YearAmountYearAmount 20142019 20152020 20162021 20172022 20182023 1.05.OptionalRedemption.TheCitymayelectonFebruary1,2020,andonanyday thereaftertoprepayBondsdueonorafterFebruary1,2021.Redemptionmaybeinwholeorin partandifinpart,attheoptionoftheCityandinsuchmannerastheCitywilldetermine.Ifless thanallBondsofamaturityarecalledforredemption,theCitywillnotifyDTC(asdefinedin Section8hereof)oftheparticularamountofsuchmaturitytobeprepaid.DTCwilldetermineby lottheamountofeachparticipant’sinterestinsuchmaturitytoberedeemedandeachparticipant willthenselectbylotthebeneficialownershipinterestsinsuchmaturitytoberedeemed. Prepaymentswillbeatapriceofparplusaccruedinterest. 1.06.TermBonds.TobecompletedifTermBondsarerequestedbythePurchaser. 392123v1MNIMN190-140 4 Section2.RegistrationandPayment. 2.01.RegisteredForm.TheBondswillbeissuedonlyinfullyregisteredform.The interestthereonand,uponsurrenderofeachBond,theprincipalamountthereof,ispayablebycheck ordraftissuedbytheRegistrardescribedherein. 2.02.Dates;InterestPaymentDates.EachBondwillbedatedasofthelastinterest paymentdateprecedingthedateofauthenticationtowhichinterestontheBondhasbeenpaidor madeavailableforpayment,unless(i)thedateofauthenticationisaninterestpaymentdateto whichinteresthasbeenpaidormadeavailableforpayment,inwhichcasetheBondwillbedatedas ofthedateofauthentication,or(ii)thedateofauthenticationispriortothefirstinterestpayment date,inwhichcasetheBondwillbedatedasofthedateoforiginalissue.TheinterestontheBonds ispayableonFebruary1andAugust1ofeachyear,commencingAugust1,2012,totheregistered ownersofrecordasofthecloseofbusinessonthefifteenthdayoftheimmediatelypreceding month,whetherornotthatdayisabusinessday. 2.03.Registration.TheCitywillappointabondregistrar,transferagent,authenticating agentandpayingagent(the“Registrar”).Theeffectofregistrationandtherightsanddutiesofthe CityandtheRegistrarwithrespecttheretoareasfollows: (a)Register.TheRegistrarmustkeepatitsprincipalcorporatetrustofficea bondregisterinwhichtheRegistrarprovidesfortheregistrationofownershipofBondsand theregistrationoftransfersandexchangesofBondsentitledtoberegistered,transferredor exchanged. (b)TransferofBonds.UponsurrenderfortransferofaBonddulyendorsedby theregisteredownerthereoforaccompaniedbyawritteninstrumentoftransfer,inform satisfactorytotheRegistrar,dulyexecutedbytheregisteredownerthereoforbyanattorney dulyauthorizedbytheregisteredownerinwriting,theRegistrarwillauthenticateand deliver,inthenameofthedesignatedtransfereeortransferees,oneormorenewBondsofa likeaggregateprincipalamountandmaturity,asrequestedbythetransferor.TheRegistrar may,however,closethebooksforregistrationofanytransferafterthefifteenthdayofthe monthprecedingeachinterestpaymentdateanduntilthatinterestpaymentdate. (c)ExchangeofBonds.WhenBondsaresurrenderedbytheregisteredowner forexchangetheRegistrarwillauthenticateanddeliveroneormorenewBondsofalike aggregateprincipalamountandmaturityasrequestedbytheregisteredownerortheowner’s attorneyinwriting. (d)Cancellation.Bondssurrenderedupontransferorexchangewillbepromptly cancelledbytheRegistrarandthereafterdisposedofasdirectedbytheCity. (e)ImproperorUnauthorizedTransfer.WhenaBondispresentedtothe Registrarfortransfer,theRegistrarmayrefusetotransfertheBonduntiltheRegistraris 392123v1MNIMN190-140 5 satisfiedthattheendorsementontheBondorseparateinstrumentoftransferisvalidand genuineandthattherequestedtransferislegallyauthorized.TheRegistrarwillincurno liabilityfortherefusal,ingoodfaith,tomaketransferswhichit,initsjudgment,deems improperorunauthorized. (f)PersonsDeemedOwners.TheCityandtheRegistrarmaytreatthepersonin whosenameaBondisregisteredinthebondregisterastheabsoluteowneroftheBond, whethertheBondisoverdueornot,forthepurposeofreceivingpaymentof,oronaccount of,theprincipalofandinterestontheBondandforallotherpurposes,andpaymentsso madetoaregisteredownerorupontheowner’sorderwillbevalidandeffectualtosatisfy anddischargetheliabilityupontheBondtotheextentofthesumorsumssopaid. (g)Taxes,FeesandCharges.TheRegistrarmayimposeachargeuponthe ownerthereofforatransferorexchangeofBondssufficienttoreimbursetheRegistrarfor anytax,feeorothergovernmentalchargerequiredtobepaidwithrespecttothetransferor exchange. (h)Mutilated,Lost,StolenorDestroyedBonds.IfaBondbecomesmutilatedor isdestroyed,stolenorlost,theRegistrarwilldeliveranewBondoflikeamount,number, maturitydateandtenorinexchangeandsubstitutionforanduponcancellationofthe mutilatedBondorinlieuofandinsubstitutionforanyBonddestroyed,stolenorlost,upon thepaymentofthereasonableexpensesandchargesoftheRegistrarinconnection therewith;and,inthecaseofaBonddestroyed,stolenorlost,uponfilingwiththeRegistrar ofevidencesatisfactorytoitthattheBondwasdestroyed,stolenorlost,andofthe ownershipthereof,anduponfurnishingtotheRegistraranappropriatebondorindemnityin form,substanceandamountsatisfactorytoitandasprovidedbylaw,inwhichboththeCity andtheRegistrarmustbenamedasobligees.BondssosurrenderedtotheRegistrarwillbe cancelledbytheRegistrarandevidenceofsuchcancellationmustbegiventotheCity.If themutilated,destroyed,stolenorlostBondhasalreadymaturedorbeencalledfor redemptioninaccordancewithitstermsitisnotnecessarytoissueanewBondpriorto payment. (i)Redemption.IntheeventanyoftheBondsarecalledforredemption,notice thereofidentifyingtheBondstoberedeemedwillbegivenbytheRegistrarbymailinga copyoftheredemptionnoticebyfirstclassmail(postageprepaid)totheregisteredownerof eachBondtoberedeemedattheaddressshownontheregistrationbookskeptbythe Registrarandbypublishingthenoticeifrequiredbylaw.Failuretogivenoticeby publicationorbymailtoanyregisteredowner,oranydefecttherein,willnotaffectthe validityofanyproceedingfortheredemptionofBonds.Bondssocalledforredemption willceasetobearinterestafterthespecifiedredemptiondate,providedthatthefundsforthe redemptionareondepositwiththeplaceofpaymentatthattime. 2.04.AppointmentofInitialRegistrar.TheCityappointsBondTrustServices Corporation,Roseville,Minnesota,astheinitialRegistrar.TheMayorandtheCityAdministrator 392123v1MNIMN190-140 6 areauthorizedtoexecuteanddeliver,onbehalfoftheCity,acontractwiththeRegistrar.Upon mergerorconsolidationoftheRegistrarwithanothercorporation,iftheresultingcorporationisa bankortrustcompanyauthorizedbylawtoconductsuchbusiness,theresultingcorporationis authorizedtoactassuccessorRegistrar.TheCityagreestopaythereasonableandcustomary chargesoftheRegistrarfortheservicesperformed.TheCityreservestherighttoremovethe Registrarupon30days’noticeandupontheappointmentofasuccessorRegistrar,inwhichevent thepredecessorRegistrarmustdeliverallcashandBondsinitspossessiontothesuccessor RegistrarandmustdeliverthebondregistertothesuccessorRegistrar.Onorbeforeeachprincipal orinterestduedate,withoutfurtherorderofthisCouncil,theCityFinanceDirectormusttransmitto theRegistrarmoneyssufficientforthepaymentofallprincipalandinterestthendue. 2.05.Execution,AuthenticationandDelivery.TheBondswillbepreparedunderthe directionoftheCityAdministratorandexecutedonbehalfoftheCitybythesignaturesofthe MayorandtheCityAdministrator,providedthatthosesignaturesmaybeprinted,engravedor lithographedfacsimilesoftheoriginals.Ifanofficerwhosesignatureorafacsimileofwhose signatureappearsontheBondsceasestobesuchofficerbeforethedeliveryofaBond,that signatureorfacsimilewillneverthelessbevalidandsufficientforallpurposes,thesameasifthe officerhadremainedinofficeuntildelivery.Notwithstandingsuchexecution,aBondwillnotbe validorobligatoryforanypurposeorentitledtoanysecurityorbenefitunderthisResolutionunless anduntilacertificateofauthenticationontheBondhasbeendulyexecutedbythemanualsignature ofanauthorizedrepresentativeoftheRegistrar.CertificatesofauthenticationondifferentBonds neednotbesignedbythesamerepresentative.TheexecutedcertificateofauthenticationonaBond isconclusiveevidencethatithasbeenauthenticatedanddeliveredunderthisResolution.Whenthe Bondshavebeensoprepared,executedandauthenticated,theCityAdministratorwilldeliverthe sametothePurchaseruponpaymentofthepurchasepriceinaccordancewiththecontractofsale heretoforemadeandexecuted,andthePurchaserisnotobligatedtoseetotheapplicationofthe purchaseprice. 2.06.TemporaryBonds.TheCitymayelecttodeliverinlieuofprinteddefinitiveBonds oneormoretypewrittentemporaryBondsinsubstantiallytheformsetforthinSection3withsuch changesasmaybenecessarytoreflectmorethanonematurityinasingletemporarybond.Upon theexecutionanddeliveryofdefinitiveBondsthetemporaryBondswillbeexchangedthereforand cancelled. Section3.FormofBond. 3.01.TheBondswillbeprintedortypewritteninsubstantiallytheformasattachedhereto asEXHIBITB. 3.02.TheCityAdministratorisauthorizedanddirectedtoobtainacopyoftheproposed approvinglegalopinionofKennedy&Graven,Chartered,Minneapolis,Minnesota,whichistobe completeexceptastodatingthereofandcausetheopiniontobeprintedonoraccompanyeach Bond. 392123v1MNIMN190-140 7 Section4.Bonds;Security;Escrow. 4.01.FundsandAccounts.Fortheconvenienceandproperadministrationofthemoneys tobeborrowedandrepaidontheBondsandtheRefundedBonds,andtoprovideadequateand specificsecurityforthePurchaserandholdersfromtimetotimeoftheBondsandRefundedBonds, thereisherebycreatedaspecialfundtobedesignatedtheRefundingBonds,Series2011ADebt ServiceFund(the“Fund”)tobeadministeredandmaintainedbytheFinanceDirectorasa bookkeepingaccountseparateandapartfromallotherfundsmaintainedintheofficialfinancial recordsoftheCity.TheFundwillbemaintainedinthemannerhereinspecifieduntilallofthe RefundedBondshavebeenpaidanduntilalloftheBondsandtheinterestthereonwillhavebeen fullypaid.TherewillbemaintainedintheFundtwoseparateaccounts,tobedesignatedtheEscrow AccountandDebtServiceAccount. (a)EscrowAccount.TheEscrowAccountwillbemaintainedasanEscrow Account(the“EscrowAccount”)withU.S.BankNationalAssociationinSt.Paul, Minnesota,whichisasuitablefinancialinstitutionwithintheState,whosedepositsare insuredbytheFederalDepositInsuranceCorporation,whosecombinedcapitalandsurplus isnotlessthan$500,000andsaidfinancialinstitutionisherebydesignatedescrowagent (the“EscrowAgent”)fortheEscrowAccount.AllproceedsofthesaleoftheBondswillbe receivedbytheEscrowAgentandappliedtofundtheEscrowAccountortopaycostsof issuingtheBonds.ProceedsoftheBondsnotusedtopaycostsofissuancearehereby irrevocablypledgedandappropriatedtotheEscrowAccount,togetherwithallinvestment earningsthereon.TheEscrowAccountwillbeinvestedinsecuritiesmaturingorcallableat theoptionoftheholderonsuchdatesandbearinginterestatsuchratesaswillberequiredto providesufficientfunds,togetherwithanycashorotherfundsretainedintheEscrow Account,topaywhenduetheinteresttoaccrueoneachBondtoandincluding February1,2013(the“RedemptionDate”),andtopaywhendueontheRedemptionDate theprincipalamountofeachoftheRefundedBondsthenoutstanding.FromtheEscrow Accounttherewillbepaid(i)allinterestpaidon,ortobepaidon,ortoaccrueon,the BondstoandincludingtheRedemptionDate,and(ii)theprincipaloftheRefundedBonds duebyreasonofredemptionontheRedemptionDate.TheEscrowAccountwillbe irrevocablyappropriatedtothepaymentoftheprincipalofandinterestontheBondsuntil theproceedsoftheBondsthereinareappliedtoprepaymentoftheRefundedBonds.The moneysintheEscrowAccountwillbeusedsolelyforthepurposeshereinsetforthandfor nootherpurpose,exceptthatanysurplusintheEscrowAccountmayberemittedtothe City,allinaccordancewiththeEscrowAgreement(hereafterdefined)byandbetweenthe CityandtheEscrowAgent.AnymoneysremittedtotheCityuponterminationofthe EscrowAgreementwillbedepositedintheDebtServiceAccount. (b)DebtServiceAccount.TotheDebtServiceAccountthereisherebypledged andirrevocablyappropriatedandtherewillbecredited:(i)anybalanceremittedtotheCity upontheterminationoftheEscrowAgreement;(ii)anybalanceremainingon February2,2013,intheDebtServiceFundcreatedbytheCityCouncilresolution 392123v1MNIMN190-140 8 authorizingtheissuanceandsaleoftheRefundedBonds(the“PriorResolution”);(iii)any collectionsofalltaxeshereafterleviedforthepaymentoftheBondsandinterestthereon; (iv)allinvestmentearningsonfundsintheDebtServiceAccount;(v)aftertheRedemption Date,alltaxescollectedaftertheRedemptionDate,pursuanttoleviesmadeinthePrior ResolutionwhichlevieswillnotbecancelledexceptaspermittedbySection475.61, Subdivision3oftheAct;netrevenuesofthemunicipalsewerandwaterandstormsewer systems;taxincrementsresultingfromincreasesinthetaxablevalueofrealpropertyinatax incrementfinancingdistrictintheCity;andallspecialassessmentspledgedtothe repaymentoftheRefundedBondsinthePriorResolution;(vi)accruedinterest(ifany) receivedupondeliveryoftheBonds,totheextentnotrequiredtofundtheEscrowAccount; and(vii)anyandallothermoneyswhichareproperlyavailableandareappropriatedbythe CityCounciltotheDebtServiceAccount.Theamountofanysurplusremaininginthe DebtServiceAccountwhentheBondsandinterestthereonarepaidwillbeusedasprovided inSection475.61,Subdivision4oftheAct. 4.02.Findings.Itisherebyfoundanddeterminedthatbaseduponinformationpresently availablefromtheCity’sfinancialadvisers,theissuanceoftheBondswillresultinareductionof debtservicecosttotheCityontheRefundedBonds,suchthatthepresentvalueofsuchdebtservice orinterestcostsavings(the“Reduction”)isatleast3.00%ofthedebtserviceontheRefunded Bonds.TheReduction,aftertheinclusionofallauthorizedexpensesofrefundinginthe computationoftheeffectiveinterestrateontheBonds,isadequatetoauthorizetheissuanceofthe BondsasprovidedbyMinnesotaStatutes,Section475.67,Subdivisions12and13. 4.03.ThemoneysintheDebtServiceAccountwillbeusedsolelytopaytheprincipalof andinterestontheBondsoranyotherbondshereafterissuedandmadepayablefromtheFund.No portionoftheproceedsoftheBondswillbeuseddirectlyorindirectlytoacquirehigheryielding investmentsortoreplacefundswhichwereuseddirectlyorindirectlytoacquirehigheryielding investments,except(i)forareasonabletemporaryperioduntilsuchproceedsareneededforthe purposeforwhichtheBondswereissued,and(ii)inadditiontotheabove,inanamountnotgreater thanthelesseroffivepercentoftheproceedsoftheBondsor$100,000.Tothiseffect,any proceedsoftheBondsandanysumsfromtimetotimeheldintheFund(oranyotherCityaccount whichwillbeusedtopayprincipalandinteresttobecomedueontheBonds)inexcessofamounts whichundertheapplicablefederalarbitrageregulationsmaybeinvestedwithoutregardastoyield willnotbeinvestedatayieldinexcessoftheapplicableyieldrestrictionsimposedbythearbitrage regulationsonsuchinvestmentsaftertakingintoaccountanyapplicabletemporaryperiodsorminor portionmadeavailableunderthefederalarbitrageregulations.Inaddition,theproceedsofthe BondsandmoneyintheFundwillnotbeinvestedinobligationsordepositsissuedby,guaranteed byorinsuredbytheUnitedStatesoranyagencyorinstrumentalitythereofifandtotheextentthat suchinvestmentwouldcausetheBondstobefederallyguaranteedwithinthemeaningofSection 149(b)oftheInternalRevenueCodeof1986,asamended(the“Code”). 4.04.GeneralObligationPledge.Forthepromptandfullpaymentoftheprincipaland interestontheBonds,asthesamerespectivelybecomedue,thefullfaith,creditandtaxingpowers oftheCitywillbeandareherebyirrevocablypledged.IfthebalanceintheEscrowAccountor 392123v1MNIMN190-140 9 DebtServiceAccountiseverinsufficienttopayallprincipalandinterestthendueontheBondsand anyotherbondspayabletherefrom,thedeficiencywillbepromptlypaidoutofmoniesinthe generalfundoftheCitywhichareavailableforsuchpurpose,andsuchgeneralfundmaybe reimbursedwithorwithoutinterestfromtheEscrowAccountorDebtServiceAccountwhena sufficientbalanceisavailabletherein. 4.05.CancellationofPriorLevyAfterRedemptionDate.Itisherebydeterminedthat uponthedepositofProceedsandFundsintheEscrowAccount(assuchtermsaredefinedin Section5hereof),anirrevocableappropriationtothedebtservicefundfortheRefundedBonds maturingaftertheRedemptionDatewillhavebeenmadewithinthemeaningofSection475.61, subdivision3oftheActandtheCityAdministratorisherebyauthorizedanddirectedtocertifysuch facttoandrequesttheCountyAuditor/Treasurertocancelanyandalltaxleviesfortaxespayablein 2014andthereaftermadebytheresolutionauthorizingandapprovingtheRefundedBonds. 4.06.PledgeofTaxLevies. (a)ToprovidemoneysforpaymentoftheprincipalandinterestontheBondsmaturing aftertheRedemptionDate,thereisherebyleviedadirectannualirrepealableadvaloremtaxupon allofthetaxablepropertyintheCitywhichwillbespreaduponthetaxrollsandcollectedwithand aspartofothergeneraltaxesoftheCity.SuchtaxwillbecreditedtotheDebtServiceFundabove providedandwillbeintheyearsandintheamountsasfollows(yearstatedbeingyearof collection): Year Levy (SeeEXHIBITC) (b)Thetaxleviesaresuchthatifcollectedinfullthey,togetherwithestimated collectionsofinvestmentearnings(anduntiltheRedemptionDate,allamountsintheEscrow Account)andotherrevenueshereinpledgedforthepaymentoftheBonds,willproduceatleastfive percentinexcessoftheamountneededtomeetwhenduetheprincipalandinterestpaymentsonthe Bonds.ThetaxlevieswillbeirrepealablesolongasanyoftheBondsareoutstandingandunpaid, providedthattheCityreservestherighttoreducetheleviesinthemannerandtotheextent permittedbyMinnesotaStatutes,Section475.61,Subdivision3,asamended. 4.07.Filing.TheCityAdministratorisauthorizedanddirectedtofileacertifiedcopyof thisresolutionwiththeCountyAuditor/TreasurerofWrightCountyandtoobtainthecertificate requiredbySection475.63oftheAct. 4.08.TheCitywillcreateandcontinuetooperateitsWaterandSewerandStormSewer Fundtowhichwillbecreditedallgrossrevenuesofthewaterandsewerandstormsewerplantand systemandoutofwhichwillbepaidallnormalandreasonableexpensesofcurrentoperationsof thewaterandsewerandstormsewerplantandsystem.Anybalancethereinwillbedeemednet 392123v1MNIMN190-140 10 revenuesandwillbetransferredfromtimetotime,togetherwithgeneraltaxeslevied(the“Taxes”), pledgedtaxincrements,andspecialassessments(the“Assessments”)leviedforsystem improvements(the“Improvements”)financedbytheRefundedBondstotheDebtServiceAccount, whichfundwillbeusedonlytopayprincipalofandinterestontheBondsaftertheRedemption Dateandanyotherbondssimilarlyauthorized.TheWaterandSewerandStormSewerFund AccountsestablishedintheresolutionawardingthesaleoftheRefundedBondsarecontinuedand willbemaintainedasthereinprovided.TherewillalwaysberetainedintheDebtServiceFunda sufficientamounttopayprincipalofandinterestonalltheBonds,andtheFinanceDirectorwill reportanycurrentoranticipateddeficiencyintheDebtServiceAccounttotheCityCouncil. 4.09.PriorResolutionPledges.ThepledgesandcovenantsoftheCitymadebythePrior Resolutionrelatingtothetaxincrementsandimprovementsfinanced,theownership,protectionof andotherparticularsgoverningtheoperationandfinancialmanagementofthemunicipalwaterand sewerandstormsewerplantandsystemandtheimprovementsthereto,thelevyandcollectionof specialassessmentsagainstpropertyspeciallybenefitedbylocalimprovementsfinancedbythe BondsandtheRefundedBondsarerestatedandconfirmedinallrespects.Theprovisionsofthe PriorResolutionareherebysupplementedtotheextentnecessarytogivefulleffecttotheprovisions ofthisresolution. Section5.Refunding;Findings;RedemptionofRefundedBonds. 5.01.AsofthedateofdeliveryofandpaymentfortheBondsproceedsoftheBonds,in theamountof$____________plusaccruedinterestontheBondslessnecessaryexpensesofthe issuanceoftheBonds(the“Proceeds”),togetherwithotherfunds(the“Funds”)intheamountof $________________,areherebypledgedandappropriatedandwillbedepositedintheEscrow Account. 5.02.ItisherebyfoundanddeterminedthattheProceedsandFundsavailableand appropriatedtotheEscrowAccountwillbesufficient,togetherwiththepermittedearningsonthe investmentoftheEscrowAccount,topayprincipalofandinterestontheBondsthroughthe RedemptionDate,andtopayatmaturityorredemptionalloftheprincipalofandredemption premium(ifany)ontheRefundedBonds. 5.03.SecuritiespurchasedfromthemoniesintheEscrowAccountwillbelimitedto securitiesspecifiedinSection475.67,Subdivision8oftheAct.Ehlers&Associates,Inc.,asagent fortheCityofMonticelloisherebyauthorizedanddirectedtopurchaseforandonbehalfofthe CityofMonticelloandinitsname,appropriatesecuritiestofundtheEscrowAccount.Uponthe issuanceanddeliveryoftheBonds,thesecuritiessopurchasedwillbedepositedwiththeEscrow AgentandheldpursuanttothetermsoftheEscrowAgreementandtheResolution. 5.04.TheRefundedBondsmaturingonFebruary1,2013andthereafterwillberedeemed andprepaidontheRedemptionDate.TheRefundedBondswillberedeemedandprepaidin accordancewiththeirtermsandinaccordancewiththetermsandconditionssetforthintheformof NoticeofCallforRedemptionattachedheretoasEXHIBITDwhichtermsandconditionsare 392123v1MNIMN190-140 11 herebyapprovedandincorporatedhereinbyreference.TheRegistrarfortheRefundedBondsis authorizedanddirectedtosendacopyoftheNoticeofRedemptiontoeachregisteredholderofthe RefundedBonds. 5.05.EscrowAgreement.OnorpriortothedeliveryoftheRefundingBonds,theMayor andtheCityAdministratorareherebyauthorizedanddirectedtoexecuteonbehalfoftheCityan escrowagreement(the“EscrowAgreement”)withtheEscrowAgentinsubstantiallytheformnow onfilewiththeCityAdministrator.AllessentialtermsandconditionsoftheEscrowAgreement includingpaymentbytheCityofreasonablechargesfortheservicesoftheEscrowAgent,are herebyapprovedandadoptedandmadeapartofthisresolution,andtheCitycovenantsthatitwill promptlyenforceallprovisionsthereofintheeventofdefaultthereunderbytheEscrowAgent. Section6.AuthenticationofTranscript. 6.01.TheofficersoftheCityareauthorizedanddirectedtoprepareandfurnishtothe PurchaserandtotheattorneysapprovingtheBonds,certifiedcopiesofproceedingsandrecordsof theCityrelatingtotheBondsandtothefinancialconditionandaffairsoftheCity,andsuchother certificates,affidavitsandtranscriptsasmayberequiredtoshowthefactswithintheirknowledgeor asshownbythebooksandrecordsintheircustodyandundertheircontrol,relatingtothevalidity andmarketabilityoftheBonds,andsuchinstruments,includinganyheretoforefurnished,willbe deemedrepresentationsoftheCityastothefactsstatedtherein. 6.02.TheMayorandCityAdministratorareherebyauthorizedanddirectedtocertifythat theyhaveexaminedtheOfficialStatementpreparedandcirculatedinconnectionwiththeissuance andsaleoftheBondsandthattothebestoftheirknowledgeandbelieftheOfficialStatementisa completeandaccuraterepresentationofthefactsandrepresentationsmadethereinasofthedateof theOfficialStatement. 6.03.TheCityauthorizesthePurchasertoforwardtheamountofBondproceedsallocable tothepaymentofissuanceexpenses(otherthanamountspayabletoKennedy&Graven,Chartered asBondCounsel)toKleinBank,Chaska,ontheclosingdateforfurtherdistributionasdirectedby theCity’sfinancialadviser,Ehlers&Associates,Inc. Section7.TaxCovenant. 7.01.TheCitycovenantsandagreeswiththeholdersfromtimetotimeoftheBondsthat itwillnottakeorpermittobetakenbyanyofitsofficers,employeesoragentsanyactionwhich wouldcausetheinterestontheBondstobecomesubjecttotaxationundertheInternalRevenue Codeof1986,asamended(the“Code”),andtheTreasuryRegulationspromulgatedthereunder,in effectatthetimeofsuchactions,andthatitwilltakeorcauseitsofficers,employeesoragentsto take,allaffirmativeactionwithinitspowerthatmaybenecessarytoensurethatsuchinterestwill notbecomesubjecttotaxationundertheCodeandapplicableTreasuryRegulations,aspresently existingorashereafteramendedandmadeapplicabletotheBonds. 392123v1MNIMN190-140 12 7.02.TheCitywillcomplywithrequirementsnecessaryundertheCodetoestablishand maintaintheexclusionfromgrossincomeoftheinterestontheBondsunderSection103ofthe Code,includingwithoutlimitationrequirementsrelatingtotemporaryperiodsforinvestments, limitationsonamountsinvestedatayieldgreaterthantheyieldontheBonds,andtherebateof excessinvestmentearningstotheUnitedStates. 7.03.TheCityfurthercovenantsnottousetheproceedsoftheBondsortocauseorpermit themoranyofthemtobeused,insuchamannerastocausetheBondstobe“privateactivity bonds”withinthemeaningofSections103and141through150oftheCode. 7.04.TheCitywilluseitsbesteffortstocomplywithanyfederalproceduralrequirements whichmayapplyinordertoeffectuatethedesignationsmadebythissection. Section8.Book-EntrySystem;LimitedObligationofCity. 8.01.TheBondswillbeinitiallyissuedintheformofaseparatesingletypewrittenor printedfullyregisteredBondforeachofthematuritiessetforthinSection1.03hereof.Uponinitial issuance,theownershipofeachsuchBondwillberegisteredintheregistrationbookskeptbythe RegistrarinthenameofCede&Co.,asnomineeforTheDepositoryTrustCompany,NewYork, NewYork,anditssuccessorsandassigns(“DTC”).Exceptasprovidedinthissection,allofthe outstandingBondswillberegisteredintheregistrationbookskeptbytheRegistrarinthenameof Cede&Co.,asnomineeofDTC. 8.02.WithrespecttoBondsregisteredintheregistrationbookskeptbytheRegistrarin thenameofCede&Co.,asnomineeofDTC,theCity,theRegistrarandthePayingAgentwill havenoresponsibilityorobligationtoanybrokerdealers,banksandotherfinancialinstitutions fromtimetotimeforwhichDTCholdsBondsassecuritiesdepository(the“Participants”)ortoany otherpersononbehalfofwhichaParticipantholdsaninterestintheBonds,includingbutnot limitedtoanyresponsibilityorobligationwithrespectto(i)theaccuracyoftherecordsofDTC, Cede&Co.oranyParticipantwithrespecttoanyownershipinterestintheBonds,(ii)thedelivery toanyParticipantoranyotherperson(otherthanaregisteredownerofBonds,asshownbythe registrationbookskeptbytheRegistrar),ofanynoticewithrespecttotheBonds,includingany noticeofredemption,or(iii)thepaymenttoanyParticipantoranyotherperson,otherthana registeredownerofBonds,ofanyamountwithrespecttoprincipalof,premium,ifany,orinterest ontheBonds.TheCity,theRegistrarandthePayingAgentmaytreatandconsiderthepersonin whosenameeachBondisregisteredintheregistrationbookskeptbytheRegistrarastheholderand absoluteownerofsuchBondforthepurposeofpaymentofprincipal,premiumandinterestwith respecttosuchBond,forthepurposeofregisteringtransferswithrespecttosuchBonds,andforall otherpurposes.ThePayingAgentwillpayallprincipalof,premium,ifany,andinterestonthe Bondsonlytoorontheorderoftherespectiveregisteredowners,asshownintheregistrationbooks keptbytheRegistrar,andallsuchpaymentswillbevalidandeffectualtofullysatisfyanddischarge theCity’sobligationswithrespecttopaymentofprincipalof,premium,ifany,orinterestonthe Bondstotheextentofthesumorsumssopaid.NopersonotherthanaregisteredownerofBonds, asshownintheregistrationbookskeptbytheRegistrar,willreceiveacertificatedBondevidencing 392123v1MNIMN190-140 13 theobligationofthisresolution.UpondeliverybyDTCtotheCityAdministratorofawritten noticetotheeffectthatDTChasdeterminedtosubstituteanewnomineeinplaceofCede&Co., thewords“Cede&Co.,”willrefertosuchnewnomineeofDTC;anduponreceiptofsuchanotice, theCityAdministratorwillpromptlydeliveracopyofthesametotheRegistrarandPayingAgent. 8.03.RepresentationLetter.TheCityhasheretoforeexecutedanddeliveredtoDTCa BlanketIssuerLetterofRepresentations(the“RepresentationLetter”)whichwillgovernpayment ofprincipalof,premium,ifany,andinterestontheBondsandnoticeswithrespecttotheBonds. AnyPayingAgentorRegistrarsubsequentlyappointedbytheCitywithrespecttotheBondswill agreetotakeallactionnecessaryforallrepresentationsoftheCityintheRepresentationletterwith respecttotheRegistrarandPayingAgent,respectively,tobecompliedwithatalltimes. 8.04.TransfersOutsideBook-EntrySystem.IntheeventtheCity,byresolutionofthe CityCouncil,determinesthatitisinthebestinterestsofthepersonshavingbeneficialinterest,in theBondsthattheybeabletoobtainBondcertificates,theCitywillnotifyDTC,whereuponDTC willnotifytheParticipants,oftheavailabilitythroughDTCofBondcertificates.Insucheventthe Citywillissue,transferandexchangeBondcertificatesasrequestedbyDTCandanyother registeredownersinaccordancewiththeprovisionsofthisResolution.DTCmaydetermineto discontinueprovidingitsserviceswithrespecttotheBondsatanytimebygivingnoticetotheCity anddischargingitsresponsibilitieswithrespecttheretounderapplicablelaw.Insuchevent,ifno successorsecuritiesdepositoryisappointed,theCitywillissueandtheRegistrarwillauthenticate Bondcertificatesinaccordancewiththisresolutionandtheprovisionshereofwillapplytothe transfer,exchangeandmethodofpaymentthereof. 8.05.PaymentstoCede&Co.NotwithstandinganyotherprovisionofthisResolutionto thecontrary,solongasaBondisregisteredinthenameofCede&Co.,asnomineeofDTC, paymentswithrespecttoprincipalof,premium,ifany,andinterestontheBondandnoticeswith respecttotheBondwillbemadeandgiven,respectivelyinthemannerprovidedinDTC’s OperationalArrangements,assetforthintheRepresentationLetter. Section9.ContinuingDisclosure. 9.01.TheCityherebycovenantsandagreesthatitwillcomplywithandcarryoutallof theprovisionsoftheContinuingDisclosureCertificate.Notwithstandinganyotherprovisionofthis Resolution,failureoftheCitytocomplywiththeContinuingDisclosureCertificatewillnotbe consideredaneventofdefaultwithrespecttotheBonds;however,anyBondholdermaysuch actionsasmaybenecessaryandappropriate,includingseekingmandateorspecificperformanceby courtorder,tocausetheCitytocomplywithitsobligationsunderthissection. 9.02.“ContinuingDisclosureCertificate”meansthatcertainContinuingDisclosure CertificateexecutedbytheMayorandCityAdministratoranddatedthedateofissuanceand deliveryoftheBonds,asoriginallyexecutedandasitmaybeamendedfromtimetotimein accordancewiththetermsthereof. 392123v1MNIMN190-140 14 Section10.Defeasance. 10.01.WhenallBondsandallinterestthereon,havebeendischargedasprovidedinthis section,allpledges,covenantsandotherrightsgrantedbythisresolutiontotheholdersoftheBonds willcease,exceptthatthepledgeofthefullfaithandcreditoftheCityforthepromptandfull paymentoftheprincipalofandinterestontheBondswillremaininfullforceandeffect.TheCity maydischargeallBondswhicharedueonanydatebydepositingwiththeRegistraronorbefore thatdateasumsufficientforthepaymentthereofinfull.IfanyBondshouldnotbepaidwhendue, itmayneverthelessbedischargedbydepositingwiththeRegistrarasumsufficientforthepayment thereofinfullwithinterestaccruedtothedateofsuchdeposit. (Theremainderofthispageisintentionallyleftblank) 392123v1MNIMN190-140 15 ThemotionfortheadoptionoftheforegoingresolutionwasdulysecondedbyMember _________________________,anduponvotebeingtakenthereon,thefollowingvotedinfavor thereof: andthefollowingvotedagainstthesame: whereuponsaidresolutionwasdeclareddulypassedandadopted. 392123v1MNIMN190-140 16 STATEOFMINNESOTA) ) COUNTYOFWRIGHT)SS. ) CITYOFMONTICELLO) I,theundersigned,beingthedulyqualifiedandactingAdministratoroftheCityof Monticello,WrightCounty,Minnesota,doherebycertifythatIhavecarefullycomparedthe attachedandforegoingextractofminutesofaregularmeetingoftheCityCounciloftheCityheld onSeptember26,2011withtheoriginalminutesonfileinmyofficeandtheextractisafull,true andcorrectcopyoftheminutesinsofarastheyrelatetotheissuanceandsaleof$______________ GeneralObligationRefundingBonds,Series2011AoftheCity. WITNESSMyhandofficiallyassuchAdministratorandthecorporatesealoftheCitythis ______dayof_______________,2011. CityAdministrator Monticello,Minnesota (SEAL) 392123v1MNIMN190-140 17 STATEOFMINNESOTACOUNTYAUDITOR/TREASURER’S CERTIFICATEASTO COUNTYOFWRIGHTTAXLEVYAND REGISTRATION I,theundersignedCountyAuditor/TreasurerofWrightCounty,Minnesota,herebycertify thatacertifiedcopyofaresolutionadoptedbythegoverningbodyoftheCityofMonticello, Minnesota,onSeptember26,2011,levyingtaxesforthepaymentof$____________General ObligationRefundingBonds,Series2011A,ofsaidmunicipalitydatedOctober19,2011,hasbeen filedinmyofficeandsaidbondshavebeenenteredontheregisterofobligationsinmyofficeand thatsuchtaxhasbeenleviedasrequiredbylaw. WITNESSMyhandandofficialsealthis_____dayof_________________,2011. CountyAuditor/Treasurer WrightCounty,Minnesota (SEAL) Deputy 392123v1MNIMN190-140 A-1 EXHIBITA PROPOSALS 392123v1MNIMN190-140 B-1 EXHIBITB FORMOFBOND No.R-____UNITEDSTATESOFAMERICA$__________ STATEOFMINNESOTA COUNTYOFWRIGHT CITYOFMONTICELLO GENERALOBLIGATIONREFUNDINGBOND, SERIES2011A Rate Maturity Dateof OriginalIssue CUSIP February1,20__October19,2011 RegisteredOwner:Cede&Co. TheCityofMonticello,Minnesota,adulyorganizedandexistingmunicipalcorporationin WrightCounty,Minnesota(the“City”),acknowledgesitselftobeindebtedandforvaluereceived promisestopaytotheRegisteredOwnerspecifiedaboveorregisteredassigns,theprincipalsumof $__________onthematuritydatespecifiedabove,withinterestthereonfromthedatehereofatthe annualratespecifiedabove,payableFebruary1andAugust1ineachyear,commencing August1,2012,tothepersoninwhosenamethisBondisregisteredatthecloseofbusinessonthe fifteenthday(whetherornotabusinessday)oftheimmediatelyprecedingmonth.Theinterest hereonand,uponpresentationandsurrenderhereof,theprincipalhereofarepayableinlawful moneyoftheUnitedStatesofAmericabycheckordraftbyBondTrustServicesCorporation, Roseville,Minnesota,asRegistrar,PayingAgent,TransferAgentandAuthenticatingAgent,orits designatedsuccessorundertheResolutiondescribedherein.Forthepromptandfullpaymentof suchprincipalandinterestasthesamerespectivelybecomedue,thefullfaithandcreditandtaxing powersoftheCityhavebeenandareherebyirrevocablypledged. TheCitymayelectonFebruary1,2020,andonanydaythereaftertoprepayBondsdueon orafterFebruary1,2021.Redemptionmaybeinwholeorinpartandifinpart,attheoptionofthe CityandinsuchmannerastheCitywilldetermine.IflessthanallBondsofamaturityarecalled forredemption,theCitywillnotifyDepositoryTrustCompany(“DTC”)oftheparticularamountof suchmaturitytobeprepaid.DTCwilldeterminebylottheamountofeachparticipant’sinterestin suchmaturitytoberedeemedandeachparticipantwillthenselectbylotthebeneficialownership 392123v1MNIMN190-140 B-2 interestsinsuchmaturitytoberedeemed.Prepaymentswillbeatapriceofparplusaccrued interest. ThisBondisoneofanissueintheaggregateprincipalamountof$_________alloflike originalissuedateandtenor,exceptastonumber,maturitydate,redemptionprivilege,andinterest rate,allissuedpursuanttoaresolutionadoptedbytheCityCouncilonSeptember26,2011 (the“Resolution”),forthepurposeofprovidingmoneytorefundinadvanceofmaturityandonthe RedemptionDate,asdefinedintheResolution,aportionofcertaingeneralobligationbondsofthe City,pursuanttoandinfullconformitywiththeConstitutionandlawsoftheStateofMinnesota, includingMinnesotaStatutes,Sections475.67,Subdivision13andChapters429,444,469and475. TheinteresthereonispayableuntiltheRedemptionDate,primarilyoutoftheEscrowAccountin theCity’sRefundingBonds,Series2011ADebtServiceFundandaftertheRedemptionDatefrom specialassessmentsagainstpropertyspeciallybenefitedbylocalimprovements,netrevenuesofthe sewerandwaterandstormsewersystemoftheCityinaspecialdebtservicefundoftheCity,from taxincrementsresultingfromincreasesinthetaxablevalueofrealpropertyinataxincrement financingdistrictintheCity,andfromadvaloremtaxes,assetforthintheResolutiontowhich referenceismadeforafullstatementofrightsandpowerstherebyconferred.Thefullfaithand creditoftheCityareirrevocablypledgedforpaymentofthisBondandtheCityCouncilhas obligateditselftolevyadditionaladvaloremtaxesonalltaxablepropertyintheCityintheeventof anydeficiencyinspecialassessments,netwaterandsewerandstormsewersystemrevenues,tax incrementsandtaxespledged,whichadditionaltaxesmaybeleviedwithoutlimitationastorateor amount.TheBondsofthisseriesareissuedonlyasfullyregisteredBondsindenominationsof $5,000oranyintegralmultiplethereofofsinglematurities. ITISHEREBYCERTIFIEDANDRECITEDThatinandbytheResolution,theCityhas covenantedandagreedthatitwillcontinuetoownandoperatethewaterandsewerandstormsewer plantandsystemfreefromcompetitionbyotherlikeutilities;thatadequateinsuranceonsaidplant andsystemandsuitablefidelitybondsonemployeeswillbecarried;thatproperandadequatebooks ofaccountwillbekeptshowingallreceiptsanddisbursementsrelatingtotheWaterandSewerand StormSewerFund,intowhichitwillpayallofthegrossrevenuesfromthewaterandsewerand stormsewerplantandsystem;thatitwillalsocreateandmaintainaRefundingBonds, Series2011ADebtServiceFund,intowhichitwillpay,outofthenetrevenuesfromthewaterand sewerandstormsewerplantandsystemasumsufficienttopayprincipalhereofandinteresthereon whendue;andthatitwillprovide,byadvaloremtaxlevies,foranydeficiencyinrequirednetwater andsewerandstormsewersystemrevenues. AsprovidedintheResolutionandsubjecttocertainlimitationssetforththerein,thisBondis transferableuponthebooksoftheCityattheprincipalofficeoftheRegistrar,bytheregistered ownerhereofinpersonorbytheowner’sattorneydulyauthorizedinwriting,uponsurrenderhereof togetherwithawritteninstrumentoftransfersatisfactorytotheRegistrar,dulyexecutedbythe registeredownerortheowner’sattorney;andmayalsobesurrenderedinexchangeforBondsof otherauthorizeddenominations.UponsuchtransferorexchangetheCitywillcauseanewBondor Bondstobeissuedinthenameofthetransfereeorregisteredowner,ofthesameaggregate principalamount,bearinginterestatthesamerateandmaturingonthesamedate,subjectto 392123v1MNIMN190-140 B-3 reimbursementforanytax,feeorgovernmentalchargerequiredtobepaidwithrespecttosuch transferorexchange. TheCityandtheRegistrarmaydeemandtreatthepersoninwhosenamethisBondis registeredastheabsoluteownerhereof,whetherthisBondisoverdueornot,forthepurposeof receivingpaymentandforallotherpurposes,andneithertheCitynortheRegistrarwillbeaffected byanynoticetothecontrary. ITISHEREBYCERTIFIED,RECITED,COVENANTEDANDAGREEDthatallacts, conditionsandthingsrequiredbytheConstitutionandlawsoftheStateofMinnesotatobedone,to exist,tohappenandtobeperformedpreliminarytoandintheissuanceofthisBondinorderto makeitavalidandbindinggeneralobligationoftheCityinaccordancewithitsterms,havebeen done,doexist,havehappenedandhavebeenperformedassorequired,andthattheissuanceofthis BonddoesnotcausetheindebtednessoftheCitytoexceedanyconstitutionalorstatutorylimitation ofindebtedness. ThisBondisnotvalidorobligatoryforanypurposeorentitledtoanysecurityorbenefit undertheResolutionuntiltheCertificateofAuthenticationhereonhasbeenexecutedbythe Registrarbymanualsignatureofoneofitsauthorizedrepresentatives. INWITNESSWHEREOF,theCityofMonticello,WrightCounty,Minnesota,byitsCity Council,hascausedthisBondtobeexecutedonitsbehalfbythefacsimileormanualsignaturesof theMayorandCityAdministratorandhascausedthisBondtobedatedasofthedatesetforth below. Dated: CITYOFMONTICELLO,MINNESOTA (Facsimile)(Facsimile) CityAdministratorMayor 392123v1MNIMN190-140 B-4 CERTIFICATEOFAUTHENTICATION ThisisoneoftheBondsdeliveredpursuanttotheResolutionmentionedwithin. BONDTRUSTSERVICES CORPORATION By ______________________________________ Thefollowingabbreviations,whenusedintheinscriptiononthefaceofthisBond,willbe construedasthoughtheywerewrittenoutinfullaccordingtoapplicablelawsorregulations: TENCOM--astenantsUNIFGIFTMINACT_________Custodian_________ incommon(Cust)(Minor) TENENT--astenantsunderUniformGiftsor byentiretiesTransferstoMinors JTTEN--asjointtenantswith rightofsurvivorshipandAct............ notastenantsincommon(State) Additionalabbreviationsmayalsobeusedthoughnotintheabovelist. ______________________________________ ASSIGNMENT Forvaluereceived,theundersignedherebysells,assignsandtransfersunto ________________________________________thewithinBondandallrightsthereunder,and doesherebyirrevocablyconstituteandappoint_______________attorneytotransferthesaidBond onthebookskeptforregistrationofthewithinBond,withfullpowerofsubstitutioninthe premises. Dated: 392123v1MNIMN190-140 B-5 Notice:Theassignor’ssignaturetothisassignmentmustcorrespondwiththename asitappearsuponthefaceofthewithinBondineveryparticular,without alterationoranychangewhatever. SignatureGuaranteed: NOTICE:Signature(s)mustbeguaranteedbyafinancialinstitutionthatisamemberofthe SecuritiesTransferAgentMedallionProgram(“STAMP”),theStockExchangeMedallionProgram (“SEMP”),theNewYorkStockExchange,Inc.MedallionSignaturesProgram(“MSP”)orother such“signatureguaranteeprogram”asmaybedeterminedbytheRegistrarinadditionto,orin substitutionfor,STAMP,SEMPorMSP,allinaccordancewiththeSecuritiesExchangeActof 1934,asamended. TheRegistrarwillnoteffecttransferofthisBondunlesstheinformationconcerningthe assigneerequestedbelowisprovided. NameandAddress: (Includeinformationforalljointownersifthis Bondisheldbyjointaccount.) Pleaseinsertsocialsecurityorother identifyingnumberofassignee 392123v1MNIMN190-140 B-6 PROVISIONSASTOREGISTRATION TheownershipoftheprincipalofandinterestonthewithinBondhasbeenregisteredonthe booksoftheRegistrarinthenameofthepersonlastnotedbelow. DateofRegistration RegisteredOwner Signatureof OfficerofRegistrar Cede&Co. FederalID#13-2555119 392123v1MNIMN190-140 C-1 EXHIBITC TAXLEVYSCHEDULE YEAR*TAXLEVY $ *Yeartaxlevycollected. 392123v1MNIMN190-140 D-1 EXHIBITD NOTICEOFCALLFORREDEMPTION $25,150,000GENERALOBLIGATIONBONDS,SERIES2005A CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA NOTICEISHEREBYGIVENthat,byorderoftheCityCounciloftheCityofMonticello, WrightCounty,Minnesota,therehavebeencalledforredemptionandprepaymenton FEBRUARY1,2013 alloutstandingbondsoftheCitydesignatedasGeneralObligationBonds,Series2005A,dated August17,2005,havingstatedmaturitydatesofFebruary1intheyears2014through2023,both inclusive,totaling$10,690,000inprincipalamount,andwiththefollowingCUSIPnumbers: YearofMaturityCUSIP 2014614468YR1 2015614468YS9 2016614468YT7 2017614468YU4 2018614468YV2 2019614468YW0 2020614468YX8 2021614468YY6 2022614468YZ3 2023614468ZA7 ThebondsarebeingcalledatapriceofparplusaccruedinteresttoFebruary1,2013,on whichdateallinterestonsaidbondswillceasetoaccrue.Holdersofthebondsherebycalledfor redemptionarerequestedtopresenttheirbondsforpaymentatBondTrustServicesCorporation, Roseville,Minnesota,onorbeforeFebruary1,2013. ImportantNotice:IncompliancewiththeJobsandGrowthTaxReliefReconciliationAct of2003,federalbackupwithholdingtaxwillbewithheldattheapplicablebackupwithholdingrate ineffectatthetimethepaymentbytheredeeminginstitutionsiftheyarenotprovidedwithyour socialsecuritynumberorfederalemployeridentificationnumber,properlycertified.This requirementisfulfilledbysubmittingaW-9Form,whichmaybeobtainedatabankorother financialinstitution. 392123v1MNIMN190-140 D-2 TheRegistrarwillnotberesponsiblefortheselectionoruseoftheCUSIPnumber,noris anyrepresentationmadeastothecorrectnessindicatedintheRedemptionNoticeoronanyBond. ItisincludedsolelyforconvenienceoftheHolders. Dated:September26,2011. BYORDEROFTHECITYCOUNCIL By/s/JeffO'Neill CityAdministrator CityofMonticello,Minnesota CityCouncilAgenda:09/26/11 1 9.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2011-92amendingtheMonticello ComprehensivePlanandrezoningfromI-1(LightIndustrial)toB-4(Regional Business)forLot1,Block1,MonticelloCommerceCenter5th (9766FallonAv); Applicant:RiverwoodBank (NAC/AS) A.REFERENCE&BACKGROUND: ThePlanningCommissionheldapublichearingforthisrequestonSeptember6th, 2011.TheCommissionrecommendedina4-1votetoapprovethecomprehensive planamendmentandrezoning. CommissionerFylevotedindissent,statingthathewouldprefertoseetheimpact thatthedevelopmentoftheMillsFleetFarmwouldhaveontheareapriorto approvingthechangeinlanduseandzoning.Mr.Fylesuggestedthatthe developmentofthatcommercialsitewillallowtheCitytobetterevaluatethe impactsonsurroundinglandusesandthechangingpatternsoflanduse. Theapplicant’srepresentativewaspresentduringthehearingandprovided additionalinformationonthecurrentusesofthesite.Nootherpublictestimony wastaken. Property:Legal:Lot1,Block1,MonticelloCommerceCenter5th Addition Address:9766FallonAvenue Thesubjectsiteislocatedatthesoutheastquadrantof FallonAvenueandChelseaRoad PlanningCaseNumber:2011-023 Request(s):ComprehensivePlanAmendmentchangingthefutureland usedesignationfrom“PlacestoWork”to“PlacestoShop”, andRezoningthesubjectparcelfromI-1,LightIndustrial toB-4,RegionalBusiness. DeadlineforDecision:October11,2011 LandUseDesignation:PlacestoWork ZoningDesignation:I-1,LightIndustrial Thepurposeofthe"I-1,"lightindustrial,districtisto providefortheestablishmentofwarehousingandlight industrialdevelopment. CityCouncilAgenda:09/26/11 2 CurrentSiteUse:The3.15acresiteisusedasanofficebuildingwith multipletenantsandacommonparkinglot.Aportionof thepropertyisavailableforanexpansionoftheofficeuses. SurroundingLandUses: North:SuburbanManufacturing,zonedI-1,LightIndustrial East:Vacant(futureMillsFleetFarm),zonedB-4,Regional Business South:IntegratedRecyclingTechnology,zonedI-1,Light Industrial West:Computercomponentsremanufacturing,zonedI-2,Heavy Industrial ProjectDescription:Theapplicantsareseekingare-guidingandrezoningofthe propertytomatchtheexistingandproposedtenantuseswiththezoningdesignation. Existingtenantsareacombinationofadministrativeofficesandcommercialoffice- servicebusinesses,manyofwhichdealdirectlywith“retail”clientsandcustomerson- site. RequirementsforComprehensivePlanAmendments Chapter2.4A(5)ApprovalCriteria RecommendationsanddecisionsonComprehensivePlanamendmentsshallbebasedon considerationofthefollowingcriteria: (a)Whethertheproposedamendmentcorrectsanerrororaddressestheneed resultingfromsomechangingcondition,trend,orfactarisingsincethe adoptionoftheComprehensivePlan; (b)Whethertheproposedamendmentisconsistentwiththeguidingprinciplesof theComprehensivePlan; (c)Theextenttowhichtheproposedamendmentaddressesademonstrated communityneed; (d)Whethertheproposedamendmentwillprotectthehealth,safety,morals,and generalwelfareofthepublic; (e)Theimpactsonthenaturalandbuiltenvironments,includingair,water,noise, stormwatermanagement,wildlifehabitat,waterquality,vegetation,drainage, streets,andotherengineeringdesignorenvironmentalfactors; (f)Whethertheproposedamendmentiscompatiblewithexistingandproposed usessurroundingthesubjectproperty;whethertheproposeddesignandland CityCouncilAgenda:09/26/11 3 usesareappropriatefortheland;andwhethertheproposedamendmentwill maintainorimprovecompatibilityamongusesandensureefficient developmentwithintheCity; (g)Whethertheproposedamendmentwillresultinalogical,orderlyand predictabledevelopmentpattern; (h)Whethertheproposedamendmentisconsistentwiththepurposeofthis ordinance. Ofthesecriteria,themostrelevantforthisspecificparcelareitems(f)and(g)relatingto existingandfuturelanduses,andlogicaldevelopmentpatterns.Withregardtothese criteria,thedesignationofthissiteforregionalbusinessreflectssomeofthecurrentuses onthesite,andmoreimportantly,reflectstheexpectedgrowthincommercialretail trafficthatwillbespawnedbytheeventualdevelopmentoftheMillsFleetFarmsiteto theeast.Moreover,ChelseaRoadwouldbeexpectedtohandleanincreasingamountof retailtrafficastheprimaryconnectionbetweeninterchangesatCounty18andHighway 25.Finally,theCity’sTransportationPlanincludesafreewayoverpassatFallon Avenue,withtheexpectationthattrafficonFallonwillincreasesignificantly. Overtime,landusesalongChelseaRoadtotheeasthavetransitionedfromindustrialto commercialdesignations.Thistransitionreflectstheimpactsthattrafficaccesshason undevelopedlandnearafreewayinterchange.Thisimpactisalsoreflectedintheuseson thesubjectproperty,andalandusedesignationchangetoamorecommercialorientation wouldbeconsistentwiththisnaturaltransition. RequirementsforZoningAmendments Chapter2.4B(5)ApprovalCriteria Recommendationsanddecisionsonzoningamendmentsshallbebasedonconsideration ofthefollowingcriteria: (a)Whethertheproposedamendmentcorrectsanerrorintheoriginaltextor map;or (b)Whethertheproposedamendmentaddressesneedsarisingfromachanging condition,trend,orfactaffectingthesubjectpropertyandsurroundingarea. (c)Whethertheproposedamendmentisconsistentwithachievingthegoalsand objectivesoutlinedinthecomprehensiveplan. AswiththeComprehensivePlanAmendment,theprimaryelementofthisapplication relatestochangingconditionsandtrendsinthesurroundingarea.Inthisregard,the CityCouncilAgenda:09/26/11 4 commentsintheprevioussectionalsoapplytotherezoninganalysiswithregardtoboth pastlandusedecisionsandfuturegrowthduetopatternsofownershipandtransportation. RelatedIssues Anamendmentinlandusedesignationonthislotstandsonitsown,basedonthecriteria outlinedintheordinance,alongwiththetrafficandexistingorfuturelandusesof propertyinthearea.Nonetheless,thischange(andtherationalesupportingit)raisesthe potentialfordiscussionofsimilarchangesonneighboringparcels.Thiscurrent applicationrelatesprimarilytoexistingusesandanticipatedgrowthinthearea. However,itisnotunexpectedthatotherparcelsintheneighborhoodwillexperience similarimpacts.TheCityCouncilmaywishtotakeup,asapartofthePlanning Commission’sannualComprehensivePlanandZoningReviewprocessinJanuary,the long-termlanduseplanningforthisareaonamorecomprehensivebasis. Changinglandusedesignationsapartfromaspecificrequestbyapropertyownercan raisecompatibilityissueswithexistinguses.Assuch,theCityCouncilmaychooseto considerhowabroaderchangeinlandusedesignationwouldaffectcurrentbusiness operations.Theseoptionswouldbeappropriatefordiscussionasapartoftheannual review. A1.BudgetImpact:None. A2.StaffImpact:None. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: TheComprehensivePlandecisionrequiresasupermajority(4/5)voteoftheCity Council. 1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2011-92amendingthedesignationofthefutureland useforthesubjectparcelfrom“PlacestoWork”to“PlacestoShop”,and rezoningthepropertyfromI-1(LightIndustrial)toB-4(RegionalBusiness), basedonfindingsoffactinsaidresolution. 2.MotiontodenyResolution#2011-92,basedonpreliminaryfindingsoffact attachedasExhibitZ. C.STAFFRECOMMNDATION: StaffrecommendsAlternative#1.ThePlanningCommissionrecommends Alternative1above.Asnotedinthereportnarrative,theconditionsonthepropertyand intheareaareanticipatedtochangeascommercialgrowthalreadyplannedforthearea CityCouncilAgenda:09/26/11 5 beginstotakehold.Thisrequestisnotthefirstchangetocommercialseenforthearea, andisnotlikelytobethelast. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Resolution#2011-92 ExhibitA-PlanningCommissionResolutionNo.2011-82 ExhibitB-AerialParcelImage ExhibitC-ComprehensivePlanLongRangeLandUseMap ExhibitD-OfficialMonticelloZoningMap ExhibitZ-PreliminaryFindingsofFactforDenial CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTIONNO.2011–92 AMENDINGTHEMONTICELLOCOMPRHENSIVEPLANANDTHECITYOF MONTICELLOOFFICIALZONINGMAPFORTHEREZONINGFROMI-1(LIGHT INDUSTRIAL)TOB-4(REGIONALBUSINESS)FORLOT1,BLOCK1, MONTICELLOCOMMERCECENTER5th ADDITION (FALLONOFFICEBUILDING) WHEREAS,RiverwoodBankhasrequestedanAmendmenttotheMonticelloComprehensive PlanLongRangeLandUsePlanfortheredesignationfrom“PlacestoWork”to“Placesto Shop,”andanamendmenttotheMonticelloOfficialZoningMapfortherezoningofLot1, Block1,MonticelloCommerceCenter5th Addition,CityofMonticelloaslegallydescribed;and WHEREAS,thePlanningCommissionreviewedtheapplicationforComprehensivePlan amendmentandrezoningpursuanttotheregulationsoftheMonticelloZoningOrdinance;and WHEREAS,thePlanningCommissionheldapublichearingonSeptember6th,2011,onthe applications;andtheapplicantandmembersofthepublicwereprovidedtheopportunityto presentinformationtothePlanningCommission;and WHEREAS,theMonticelloCityCouncilhasconsideredallofthecommentsandthestaff report,whichareincorporatedbyreferenceintothisresolution;and WHEREAS,theMonticelloCityCouncilmakesthefollowingFindingsofFactinrelationtothe recommendationofapproval: (a)Theamendmentandrezoningaddresstheneedresultingfromatrendtoward commerciallandusesintheareaarisingsincetheadoptionoftheComprehensive Plan; (b)Theproposedamendmentandrezoningaccommodatecommercialuseswhichare compatiblewithexistingandproposedcommercialusessurroundingthesubject property;theproposeddesignandlanduseisappropriateforthelandwith adequateparking,greenspace,andexpansionareaforsimilarlanduses;andthe proposedamendmentwillmaintainorimprovecompatibilityamongnearby existingandplannedcommercialusesandensureefficientdevelopmentwithin theCity; (c)Theproposedamendmentandrezoningtoacommerciallandusedesignationand zoningisconsistentwiththeguidingprinciplesoftheComprehensivePlan; (d)Theamendmentandrezoningtoacommerciallandusedesignationandzoning willresultinalogical,orderlyandpredictabledevelopmentpattern;and (e)Theproposedamendmentandrezoningtoacommerciallandusedesignationand zoningwiththepurposeoftheMonticelloZoningordinance. NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVED,thattheCityCounciloftheCityofMonticello, Minnesotadeems: PursuanttoMinn.Stat.§462.357,theAmendmenttotheMonticelloComprehensive Plan,LongRangeLandUsePlanandAmendmenttotheCityofMonticelloOfficial ZoningMapfortheRezoningfromI-1(LightIndustrial)toB-4(RegionalBusiness)for Lot1,Block1,MonticelloCommerceCenter5th Additionisherebyapproved. ADOPTED BY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis26th dayofSeptember,2011. CITYOFMONTICELLO _______________________________ ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________________ JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2011 –82 Date: September 6th, 2011 Resolution No. 2011-82 Motion By: _____________________ Seconded By: ________________________ A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE MONTICELLO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE CITY OF MONTICELLO OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR THE REZONING FROM I-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) TO B-4 (REGIONAL BUSINESS) FOR LOT 1, BLOCK 1, MONTICELLO COMMERCE CENTER 5th ADDITION. WHEREAS, Riverwood Bank has requested an Amendment to the Monticello Comprehensive Plan Long Range Land Use Plan for the redesignation from Places to Work to Places to Shop, and the Monticello Official Zoning Map for the rezoning of Lot 1, Block 1, Monticello Commerce Center 5th Addition as legally described on the attached Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application for Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning pursuant to the regulations of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 6th, 2011 on the applications and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: (a) The amendment and rezoning address the need resulting from a trend toward commercial land uses in the area arising since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan; (b) The proposed amendment and rezoning accommodate commercial uses which are compatible with existing and proposed commercial uses surrounding the subject property; the proposed design and land use is appropriate for the land with adequate parking, green space, and expansion area for similar land uses; and the proposed amendment will maintain or improve compatibility among nearby existing and planned commercial uses and ensure efficient development within the City; (c) The proposed amendment and rezoning to a commercial land use designation and zoning is consistent with the guiding principles of the Comprehensive Plan; (d) The amendment and rezoning to a commercial land use designation and zoning will result in a logical, orderly and predictable development pattern; and (e) The proposed amendment and rezoning to a commercial land use designation and zoning with the purpose of the Monticello Zoning ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: 1. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §462.357, the application for Amendment to the Monticello Comprehensive Plan, Long Range Land Use Plan and Amendment to the City of Monticello Official Zoning Map for the Rezoning from I-1 (Light Industrial) to B-4 (Regional Business) for Lot 1, Block 1, Monticello Commerce Center 5th Addition is hereby recommended to the City Council for approval. ADOPTED this 6th day of September, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION By: _______________________________ Rod Dragsten, Chair ATTEST: _____________________________________ Angela Schumann, Community Development Director EXHIBIT A LOT 1, BLOCK 1, MONTICELLO COMMERCE CENTER 5th ADDITION, City of Monticello Lot 1, Block 1, Monticello Commerce Center 5th Addition—9766 Fallon Avenue Land Use Map Lot 1, Block 1, Monticello Commerce Center 5th Addition—9766 Fallon Avenue Zoning Map 1 ExhibitZ–PreliminaryFindingsofFactforDenial Lot1,Block1,MonticelloCommerceCenter5th (9766FallonAv) Applicant:RiverwoodBank 1.Thepropertyinquestionisdesignedforofficeuses,apermittedusewithintheI-1Zoning District. 2.Thepropertiestothenorth,west,andsouthareallindustrialuseswithnospecificplans forchangetomorecommercialactivities. 3.IntroductionofacommercialdesignationonthesoutheastcorneroftheFallon/Chelsea intersectionwillputunduepressureonotherparcelstoseekchangesinlanduse. 4.TheCity’sindustriallandsupplyinthisareahasalreadybeenreducedinvolumethrough previouschanges,andshouldbeprotectedfromfurthererosion. 5.Futurechangestoarealanduseandtransportationsystems,whileplanned,arestill speculative. 6.Theintroductionofpotentialretailusesatthissitewillcreatecompatibilityissueswith bothlightandheavyindustrialusersonadjoiningproperty. CityCouncilAgenda:09/26/11 1 10.Considerationofreimbursingpropertyownerat102CedarStreetforretainingwall materials,CityProjectNo.11C001.(BW) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: Thepropertyownerat102CedarStreetrecentlyconstructedalandscaperetainingwall behindthepublicsidewalkontheeastsideofCedarStreet,southofEastRiverStreet, whichwasbeinginstalledwiththe2011StreetReconstructionproject.Theareabehind thewallwasthenplantedwithvegetationbythepropertyowner. PriortoinstallingthesidewalkalongCedarStreet,staffreviewedoptionsforconstructing thesidewalkandgradingbehindittomatchintotheexistingground.Atthattimeitwas notedthatthepropertyownerhadplantedagoodportionoftheboulevardareawithinthe right-of-waywithvegetation,therebypreventingusfromslopingthegroundbackbehind thesidewalkata3:1orshallowerslopetoallowforeaseofmaintenancewithout impactingtheplantings.Seepicture#1attachedassupportingdata. Oneoptionthatwasdiscussedwastoraisetheelevationofthesidewalk6”to12”by constructingaconcreteboulevardimmediatelybehindthecurbata1:1slope.This wouldhaveallowedustogradeamaintainableslopebehindthesidewalkwithout encroachingintotheplantings,eventhoughtheyarewithinCityright-of-way. Otheroptionswerealsobeingexploredwhenthepropertyowneraskedifhecouldinstall ashortretainingwallbehindthesidewalktoallowhimtoextendhisplantingareaoutto thebackofthewallbehindthesidewalk.Hesaidhewouldpayforandconstructthe wall.Stafftoldthepropertyownerthatashortretainingwallwouldbeallowable. Thatweekendthepropertyownererectedthewall.Seeattachedpictures2through5.As canbeseen,thewallwasbuiltusingmini-retainingwallblockandwillthereforelikely becomeamaintenanceissuefortheCitysincetheCitywillbeclearingthiswalkofsnow andiceduringthewinterandoursnowremovalequipmentwilllikelyimpactthewall fromtimetotime,eventuallycausingdamage. Erectingretainingwalls,revisinggradesand/orinstallingplantingbedswithinCityright- of-wayisnotallowedbyCityordinance.However,theCityhasapprovedsuchrequests whenworkingonstreetreconstructionprojectsinthepastgiventhenumerousexisting non-complianceissuesthatareencounteredontheseprojects. Afterthewallwaserectedthepropertyownersaidhewasnotmadeawareoftheoptions thattheCityhadandthoughthehadtoinstallthewallinordertopreventhavingaslope behindthewalkthathewouldn’tbeabletomaintain.Heisthereforerequestingthatthe Cityreimbursehimintheamountof$500(+/-)formaterialsusedtoconstructthewall. Stafffeelstheoptionswewereexploringwerearticulatedtothepropertyowner,andthat itwasmadeclearthatwehadotheroptionsavailabletousbesidesconstructinga CityCouncilAgenda:09/26/11 2 retainingwallinordertoestablishamaintainablebackslope.Assuch,staffdoesnot recommendreimbursingthepropertyownerforthematerials. ItshouldbenotedthatthepropertyownerdidnotprovideCitystaffwithanyplansfor theproposedwallafterverbalapprovalwasprovided,andapermitwasneverpulled. A1.BudgetImpact:Thepropertyownerhasestimatedtheircostformaterialsforthe retainingwallat$500. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:StafffromtheEngineeringandPublicWorks Departmentswilllikelybeimpactedtovaryingdegrees,dependingonCouncils direction. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Motiontodenyreimbursementtothepropertyownerformaterialsrequiredto constructthelandscaperetainingwallat102CedarStreet. 2.Motiontoreimbursethepropertyownerformaterialsrequiredtoconstructthe landscaperetainingwallat102CedarStreet. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: StaffrecommendsapprovingAlternative#1forthereasonnotedabove. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Pictures(5)