Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 03-26-2012AGENDA SPECIALWORKSHOP/MEETING–MONTICELLOCITYCOUNCIL Monday,March26,2012–6:15p.m. MississippiRoom,MonticelloCommunityCenter Mayor:ClintHerbst CouncilMembers:LloydHilgart,TomPerrault,GlenPosusta,BrianStumpf Others:TomKelly,JeffO’Neill,RandallJohnsen 1.CalltoOrder 2.PurposeofWorkshop:Discussionofpossible2nd liquorstorelocation 3.Considerationofasecondliquorstorelocation 4.Adjournment SpecialCouncilAgenda:3/26/2012 1 3.Considerationofsecondliquorstorelocation (TK) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: ThepurposeofthisitemistohavetheCouncilconsiderapossiblesecondliquorstore location.Aroundtheyear2000,theCityhadastudycompletedonthepossiblelocation ofasecondliquorstore.ThestudyrecommendedtheareaofCSAH18andBroadwayas thebestpossiblelocationofasecondstore.Whilepurchasinglandandconstructinga newstoreinthisareacouldbecostly,theCitycouldbenefitfromindividualsthatwould stopatthestore,afterleavingI-94atCSAH18exittoBroadwaytoHighway25tocross theriver. Aquick,lessexpensivewaytoaccomplishasecondstorewouldbetopurchasean existingbuilding.Currentlytheconvenientstore/gasstationat1549EBroadwayisfor sale.Thesalepriceis$549,000,withaCountyassessedvalueof$611,000.Theparcel isabout1acreinsizewithabuildingsizeofabout4,000squarefeet. Theadvantagesofthissiteandbuildingare: Inthearearecommendedbythestudy Easyaccess Goodvisibility Coolersalreadyinplace Minorinteriorremodelingneeded Couldcloseandremodelinashortperiodoftime Thedisadvantagesare: Buildingisonlyabout4,000squarefeet NoBackroomstoragearea,onlystorefloorarea Wouldneedtoremovefueltanks Smallloadingareabehindstoreandclosetoapartmentcomplexnextdoor Currentconvenientstore/gasstationwouldbeoutofbusiness Tomoveforwardwithapurchaseandtoconstructanewstoreorremodelanexisting buildingwilltakeupsomestafftime,sostaffwouldliketoreceivedirectionfrom Councilbeforepursuingasecondliquorstorelocation. A1.BudgetImpact:Thecosttopurchaseorbuildasecondstorewasnotbudgeted, butfundswouldcomefromtheLiquorFund.Oncepurchasedtherewouldbe operatingcostsandrevenueassociatedwiththesecondstore. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Therewouldbesomestaffworkinvolvedwith purchasingorbuildingasecondstore.Tooperateasecondstoreadditionalliquor staffwouldberequired. SpecialCouncilAgenda:3/26/2012 2 B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.DiscussCouncil’sdesiretooperateasecondstorelocationandthepossible locationandifasecondlocationisdesiredatthistimedirectstafftoproceedwith securingapossiblelocation. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: Staffhasnorecommendationatthistime. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Copyofpropertylistingof1549E.BroadwayStreet AGENDA REGULARMEETING–MONTICELLOCITYCOUNCIL Monday,March26,2012–7p.m. MississippiRoom,MonticelloCommunityCenter Mayor:ClintHerbst CouncilMembers:LloydHilgart,TomPerrault,GlenPosusta,BrianStumpf 1.CalltoOrderandPledgeofAllegiance 2A.ApprovalofMinutes–March12,2012SpecialMeeting/Workshop 2B.ApprovalofMinutes–March12,2012RegularMeeting 3.Considerationofaddingitemstotheagenda 4.Citizencomments,publicserviceannouncements,andstaffupdates a.CitizenComments: b.PublicServiceAnnouncements: 1)MCCBreakfastwiththeBunny(3/31) c.StaffUpdates: 1) 5.ConsentAgenda: A.ConsiderationofapprovingpaymentofbillsforMarch26th B.ConsiderationofapprovingnewhiresanddeparturesforCitydepartments C.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2012-026acceptingcontributionfrom TomPerraultfortheGeneralFund D.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2012-027reestablishingthesameprecinct andpollingplacefortheCityofMonticello E.ConsiderationofadoptingOrdinance#546amendingtheMonticelloZoning Ordinance,Section2.4(P)forSpecificReviewRequirementsandProceduresfor PlannedUnitDevelopmentandadoptingSummaryOrdinance#546Afor publication.Applicant:CityofMonticello F.ConsiderationofadoptingOrdinance#555updatingandextendingtheInterim TemporarySignOrdinance#526toApril1,2013 SPECIALMEETING 6:15p.m.–Potential2nd LiquorStorelocation G.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2012-030supportingsubmissionof applicationforDNR2012RegionalTrailsgrantandadoptingResolution#2012- 031supportingsubmissionofapplicationforDNR2012LocalTrailsgrant 6.Considerationofitemsremovedfromtheconsentagendafordiscussion 7.PublicHearing–ConsiderationofadoptingOrdinance#556amendingthe2012Fee SchedulerelatingtoRight-of-Waypermitfees 8.ConsiderationofadoptingaRelocationPrioritiesPolicyandaRelocationAssistance Policy 9.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2012-029acceptingFeasibilityReportandcalling forPublicHearingfor2012RuralRoadImprovements,CityProjectNo.12C001 10.ConsiderationofaddingPathwayReconstructionforthreeSegmentsto2012RuralRoad Improvements,CityProjectNo.12C001 11.Addeditems 12.Adjournment CityCouncilAgenda:03/26/12 1 5A.ConsiderationofapprovingpaymentofbillregistersforMarch26th (TK) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: TheattachedbillregisterscontainallinvoicesprocessedsincethelastCouncilmeeting. SubjecttoMNStatutes,mostinvoicesrequireCouncilapprovalpriortoreleasingchecks forpayment.ThedayfollowingCouncilapproval,paymentswillbereleasedunless directedotherwise. IfCouncilhasnoquestionsorcommentsonthebillregisters,thesecanbeapprovedwith theconsentagenda.Ifrequested,thisitemcanberemovedfromconsentanddiscussed priortomakingamotionforapproval. A1.BudgetImpact:None A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Noadditionalworkrequired B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Motiontoapprovethebillregistersforatotalamountof$607,345.81. 2.MotiontoapprovethebillregisterswithchangesdirectedbyCouncil. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1or#2,perdirectionofCouncil. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Billregisters User: Printed:03/21/2012 - 1:24PM Ann.Zimmerman Computer Check Proof List by Vendor Accounts Payable Batch:00204.03.2012 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor:2315 A AND E TELEVISION NETWORKS LLC Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: False 8372357 A & E February 2012 749.99 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 749.99Check Total: Vendor:2315 A AND E TELEVISION NETWORKS LLC Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: False 8371222 A & E En Espanol February 2012 25.00 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 25.00Check Total: Vendor:2315 A AND E TELEVISION NETWORKS LLC Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: False 8371242 A & E Military History February 2012 148.00 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 148.00Check Total: Vendor:2315 A AND E TELEVISION NETWORKS LLC Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: False 8372468 A & E History February 2012 552.97 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 552.97Check Total: Vendor:2315 A AND E TELEVISION NETWORKS LLC Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: False 8371972 A & E History International February 2012 416.25 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 416.25Check Total: Vendor:1002 A E MICHAELS DECORATING CENTER INC Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: False 60% Deposit Flooring - demo; prep; materials & install 14,319.00 03/27/2012 609-49754-440100 14,319.00Check Total: Vendor:1006 ABM EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY LLC Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: False 131868-IN (2) filter elements 262.85 03/27/2012 602-49490-422100 262.85Check Total: AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor:2840 AGER INC Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: False Refund FiberNet Monticello acct # 67479 277.73 03/27/2012 655-00000-115040 277.73Check Total: Vendor:2519 ALBERG WATER SERVICES INC Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: True 2504 Well #5 - labor/supplies (8) bearings; (10) couplings; ect 15,933.00 03/27/2012 601-49440-440600 15,933.00Check Total: Vendor:2825 ALLINA OCC MED NW 5685 Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: False 77741 (1) OCC Health Breath Alcohol test 30.00 03/27/2012 101-43120-431990 30.00Check Total: Vendor:1028 AMERIPRIDE LINEN AND APPERAL SERVICES Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: False 2200221349 17.60 03/27/2012 226-45122-441700 2200221349 60.65 03/27/2012 226-45122-431110 2200221349 12.04 03/27/2012 226-45122-441710 90.29Check Total: Vendor:1977 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: False 28059 (30) minitor V Nylon carry case w/flag 398.64 03/27/2012 101-42200-421990 398.64Check Total: Vendor:1032 ANDERSON CRANE RUBBER CO Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: False MP20112201 (10) V-belts 71.47 03/27/2012 226-45122-422990 71.47Check Total: Vendor:2828 APA-MN ADMINISTRATORS Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: False 5/17 Workshop 5/17/12 APA-MN Spring Seminar - Angela Schumann 80.00 03/27/2012 101-41910-433200 80.00Check Total: Vendor:1036 APEC Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: False 117521 (24) pleated filters 241.20 03/27/2012 226-45122-422990 117525 (24) blue filters 375.57 03/27/2012 226-45122-422990 616.77Check Total: Vendor:1038 APPERTS FOOD SERVICE Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: False 1703741 5.25 03/27/2012 226-45122-433300 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 1703741 92.30 03/27/2012 226-45127-421460 1703741 re-sale 401.51 03/27/2012 226-45127-425410 499.06Check Total: Vendor:1039 AQUA LOGIC INC Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: False 38621 Play feature - replaced pump labor/supplies 335.24 03/27/2012 226-45122-440800 335.24Check Total: Vendor:1040 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: False 629-7438711 3.85 03/27/2012 101-43110-441700 629-7438711 38.46 03/27/2012 101-45201-441700 629-7438711 14.55 03/27/2012 602-49490-441700 629-7438711 14.55 03/27/2012 601-49440-441700 629-7438711 46.28 03/27/2012 101-43120-441700 629-7438711 47.84 03/27/2012 101-43127-421990 629-7443616 4.03 03/27/2012 101-43110-441700 629-7443616 34.73 03/27/2012 101-45201-441700 629-7443616 15.41 03/27/2012 602-49490-441700 629-7443616 15.41 03/27/2012 601-49440-441700 629-7443616 48.78 03/27/2012 101-43120-441700 629-7443616 54.30 03/27/2012 101-43127-421990 629-7448565 4.04 03/27/2012 101-43110-441700 629-7448565 34.72 03/27/2012 101-45201-441700 629-7448565 15.42 03/27/2012 602-49490-441700 629-7448565 15.42 03/27/2012 601-49440-441700 629-7448565 48.79 03/27/2012 101-43120-441700 629-7448565 54.98 03/27/2012 101-43127-421990 511.56Check Total: Vendor:2701 ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM LLC Check Sequence: 19 ACH Enabled: False 11-1057-01 ZEDTMS - 12/1/11-3/1/12 Downtown Hardware store (bill Grady$1400 1,203.66 03/27/2012 213-46522-431990 1,203.66Check Total: Vendor:1041 ARCTIC GLACIER INC Check Sequence: 20 ACH Enabled: False 412206811 re-sale 148.00 03/27/2012 609-49750-425500 148.00Check Total: Vendor:1368 AUTO VALUE MONTICELLO Check Sequence: 21 ACH Enabled: False 21026682 (2) mini lamps 2.12 03/27/2012 101-42200-421990 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 2.12Check Total: Vendor:2319 AVAIL TVN CORPORATION Check Sequence: 22 ACH Enabled: False 18796 Avail-TVN PPV February 2012 26.70 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 18796 Avail-TVN VOD February 2012 1,307.01 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 1,333.71Check Total: Vendor:1053 KATHLEEN M BALTOS Check Sequence: 23 ACH Enabled: True 3/1/12 Mileage - Parks & Rec Workshop Maple Grove 26.23 03/27/2012 226-45122-433100 26.23Check Total: Vendor:1062 BEAUDRY OIL COMPANY Check Sequence: 24 ACH Enabled: False 768668 558.9 gallons (kodiak winter #2nleaded plus) 2,076.31 03/27/2012 101-43120-421200 768669 477.6 gallons (unleaded plus) 1,583.25 03/27/2012 101-43120-421200 768709 641.3 gallons (kodiak winter #2) 2,343.95 03/27/2012 101-43120-421200 6,003.51Check Total: Vendor:1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION Check Sequence: 25 ACH Enabled: False 72464600 17.60 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 72464600 319.50 03/27/2012 609-49750-425100 72464600 296.00 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 72464600 re-sale 18.95 03/27/2012 609-49750-425400 72535800 25.20 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 72535800 220.75 03/27/2012 609-49750-425100 72535800 628.00 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 1,526.00Check Total: Vendor:1066 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC Check Sequence: 26 ACH Enabled: False 1354824 (21) pizzas 105.00 03/27/2012 226-45127-421460 1354824 re-sale (51) pizzas 255.00 03/27/2012 226-45127-425410 360.00Check Total: Vendor:1067 BERNICK'S Check Sequence: 27 ACH Enabled: False 139434 re-sale 101.80 03/27/2012 609-49750-425400 139435 593.25 03/27/2012 609-49750-425200 139436 168.00 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 139440 re-sale 190.50 03/27/2012 226-45127-425410 141922 re-sale 505.81 03/27/2012 226-45127-425410 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 141924 re-sale 12.60 03/27/2012 609-49750-425400 141924 re-sale 16.40 03/27/2012 609-49750-425500 141925 630.75 03/27/2012 609-49750-425200 141926 88.20 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 2,307.31Check Total: Vendor:1701 BIFF'S INC Check Sequence: 28 ACH Enabled: False W456888 Ellison Park - 2/8/12 - 3/6/12 40.04 03/27/2012 101-45201-431990 W456889 Pioneer Park - 2/8/12 - 3/6/12 40.04 03/27/2012 101-45201-431990 W456890 E 4th Street Park - 2/8/12 - 3/6/12 40.04 03/27/2012 101-45201-431990 W456891 Public Works - 2/8/12 - 3/6/12 40.04 03/27/2012 101-45201-431990 160.16Check Total: Vendor:2221 BIG TEN NETWORK LLC Check Sequence: 29 ACH Enabled: False C70085 Big 10 February 2012 1,148.32 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 C70085 Big 10 Bulks February 2012 187.50 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 1,335.82Check Total: Vendor:2481 BRAVO COMPANY BANK OF AMERICA Check Sequence: 30 ACH Enabled: False 421102 Bravo February 2012 393.13 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 393.13Check Total: Vendor:2047 BRIDGE WATER TELEPHONE COMPANY Check Sequence: 31 ACH Enabled: False 665FNMT-S-12073 Voice - interconnet fees 3/13-4/12/12 425.77 03/27/2012 655-49860-430910 425.77Check Total: Vendor:1091 CAMPBELL KNUTSON PA Check Sequence: 32 ACH Enabled: False 2348-001G63 Code enforcement 42.00 03/27/2012 101-42400-430400 2348-115G11 Motzko Co LLC Litigation 630.00 03/27/2012 101-41610-430400 672.00Check Total: Vendor:2220 CBS SPORTS NETWORK Check Sequence: 33 ACH Enabled: False 050103 CBS College Sports February 2012 86.08 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 86.08Check Total: Vendor:2213 CBS TV STATIONS Check Sequence: 34 ACH Enabled: False Feb-12 WCCO February 2012 894.20 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 894.20Check Total: Vendor:1098 CCG CONSULTING LLC Check Sequence: 35 ACH Enabled: False 3020-001M Reimb TRA assessment - data storage fee 31.83 03/27/2012 655-49870-431990 31.83Check Total: Vendor:1102 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Check Sequence: 36 ACH Enabled: False 3/2/12 5788570-9 139.24 03/27/2012 609-49754-438300 3/2/12 5768542-2 220.09 03/27/2012 101-41940-438300 3/2/12 5768542-2 5,089.50 03/27/2012 226-45122-438300 3/2/12 5768542-2 82.53 03/27/2012 101-45175-438300 3/2/12 5768542-2 110.04 03/27/2012 101-42800-438300 3/2/12 5828859-8 55.19 03/27/2012 101-41940-438300 3/2/12 8235331-9 117.78 03/27/2012 101-41941-438300 3/2/12 8235333-5 65.58 03/27/2012 101-41941-438300 3/9/12 5863599-6 117.21 03/27/2012 101-42700-438300 3/9/12 5804618-6 12.82 03/27/2012 101-45201-438300 6,009.98Check Total: Vendor:2654 CENTURYLINK Check Sequence: 37 ACH Enabled: False L04003703712061 Voice - CABS 3/1-3/31/12 monthly access charges 120.94 03/27/2012 655-49860-430910 120.94Check Total: Vendor:2487 CHILLER BANK OF AMERICA Check Sequence: 38 ACH Enabled: False 421104 Chiller February 2012 75.32 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 75.32Check Total: Vendor:2482 CLOO Check Sequence: 39 ACH Enabled: False 421105 Sleuth February 2012 75.32 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 75.32Check Total: Vendor:2479 CNBC INC BANK OF AMERICA Check Sequence: 40 ACH Enabled: False 421106 CNBC February 2012 573.50 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 421108 CNBC World February 2012 39.01 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 612.51Check Total: Vendor:2618 COBRA MECHANICAL SERVICES INC Check Sequence: 41 ACH Enabled: False 164 Labor - (3) boilder tune-up 1,440.00 03/27/2012 226-45122-440440 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 6 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 164 Parts - (3) boilder tune-up 75.00 03/27/2012 226-45122-440440 165 Labor - #1 boiler circ pump; #4 & #7 airhandler heat valve 810.00 03/27/2012 226-45122-440100 165 Parts - #1 boiler circ pump; #4 & #7 airhandler heat valve 581.12 03/27/2012 226-45122-440100 2,906.12Check Total: Vendor:2256 COMCAST SHARED SERVICES VERSUS Check Sequence: 42 ACH Enabled: False 421122 Versus February 2012 281.11 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 281.11Check Total: Vendor:2256 COMCAST SHARED SERVICES VERSUS Check Sequence: 43 ACH Enabled: False 421123 Versus HD February 2012 1.75 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 1.75Check Total: Vendor:2838 KEVIN AND BRENDA CONVERSE Check Sequence: 44 ACH Enabled: False Refund FiberNet Monticello acct # 66201 36.35 03/27/2012 655-00000-115040 36.35Check Total: Vendor:2279 THE COOKING CHANNEL Check Sequence: 45 ACH Enabled: False Feb-12 Cooking Channel February 2012 51.11 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 51.11Check Total: Vendor:2830 COPYRIGHT I&R/RECORDATION Check Sequence: 46 ACH Enabled: False Designation Interim Designation - Natalie Matejka 105.00 03/27/2012 655-49870-431990 105.00Check Total: Vendor:2476 CSI DIGITAL INC Check Sequence: 47 ACH Enabled: True 101227 (1183) ViewRight STB client liceses yearly mtc 2011 1,774.50 03/27/2012 655-49870-443700 1,774.50Check Total: Vendor:1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 48 ACH Enabled: False 1015760 17,773.05 03/27/2012 609-49750-425200 1015785 2,459.65 03/27/2012 609-49750-425200 1015795 5,817.64 03/27/2012 609-49750-425200 1018440 2,946.70 03/27/2012 609-49750-425200 1021203 160.02 03/27/2012 609-49750-425100 3019 167.30 03/27/2012 609-49750-425200 3128 48.00 03/27/2012 609-49750-425200 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 29,372.36Check Total: Vendor:1134 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Check Sequence: 49 ACH Enabled: False 640998 1,212.35 03/27/2012 609-49750-425200 641692 33.80 03/27/2012 609-49750-425200 641777 2,649.59 03/27/2012 609-49750-425200 641777 re-sale 22.40 03/27/2012 609-49750-425400 3,918.14Check Total: Vendor:2527 DEATONS MAILING SYSTEMS INC Check Sequence: 50 ACH Enabled: False 39782 Mailing system - (1) ink cartridge 153.90 03/27/2012 101-41940-421990 153.90Check Total: Vendor:1136 GORDON J DEHMER Check Sequence: 51 ACH Enabled: False 6132 Labor - extinquisher recharge; moblie service 158.50 03/27/2012 101-42200-440440 6132 Parts - extinquisher service 10.69 03/27/2012 101-42200-440440 169.19Check Total: Vendor:2278 DIY NETWORK Check Sequence: 52 ACH Enabled: False Feb-12 diy February 2012 51.11 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 51.11Check Total: Vendor:1152 ECHOSTAR SATELLITE LLC Check Sequence: 53 ACH Enabled: False 90652 03/12 (3/22/12 - 4/21/12) digital music 68.39 03/27/2012 226-45122-432500 68.39Check Total: Vendor:1156 EDP OF WRIGHT COUNTY Check Sequence: 54 ACH Enabled: False 2/9/12 2/9/12 Site Selector's View - Megan Barneet Livgard 25.00 03/27/2012 101-46500-433200 25.00Check Total: Vendor:1161 ELECTION SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE INC Check Sequence: 55 ACH Enabled: False 799611 utx - 6/1-12/31/12 Usage Agrmt-100 & AutoMark (20% of total) 32.00 03/27/2012 101-41410-431900 799611 6/1-12/31/12 Usage Agrmt-100 & AutoMark (bal of 2012 after utx) 61.31 03/27/2012 101-41410-431900 799611 1/1-3/31/13 Usage Agrmt-100 & AutoMark 39.99 03/27/2012 101-00000-155010 799611 4/1-5/31/13 Usage Agrmt-100 & AutoMark 26.70 03/27/2012 101-00000-155010 799611 6/1-12/31/12 Silver-HDW Mtc/Support Auto; M100 422.94 03/27/2012 101-41410-431900 799611 1/1-3/31/13 Silver-HDW Mtc/Support Auto; M100 181.26 03/27/2012 101-00000-155010 799611 4/1-6/30/13 Silver-HDW Mtc/Support Auto; M100 120.80 03/27/2012 101-00000-155010 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 8 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 885.00Check Total: Vendor:1793 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC Check Sequence: 56 ACH Enabled: False JC030612-1 #110 & stock - (2) 7eltubes repl strobe assy w/deutsch 205.04 03/27/2012 101-43120-422110 205.04Check Total: Vendor:1678 ARC ERS DIGITAL INC Check Sequence: 57 ACH Enabled: False MN10031521 utx - 11C006 - Plans for bidders (partial reimb from bidders) 8,134.49 03/27/2012 226-45122-453010 8,134.49Check Total: Vendor:1167 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 58 ACH Enabled: False 122-479 re-sale 348.50 03/27/2012 609-49750-425400 348.50Check Total: Vendor:1177 FIRE INSTRUCTION RESCUE EDUCAT Check Sequence: 59 ACH Enabled: False 08909 2/16/12 Asbestos Inspection - 701 Elm St 450.00 03/27/2012 101-42200-431990 450.00Check Total: Vendor:2836 CASEY FLESCH Check Sequence: 60 ACH Enabled: False Refund FiberNet Monticello acct # 65904 32.30 03/27/2012 655-00000-115040 32.30Check Total: Vendor:1188 FORESTEDGE WINERY Check Sequence: 61 ACH Enabled: False 2006 332.40 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 332.40Check Total: Vendor:2222 FOX SPORTS NET NORTH HD Check Sequence: 62 ACH Enabled: False C67229 Fox Sports North February 2012 5,030.64 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 C67229 Fox Sports North Taverns February 2012 187.50 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 5,218.14Check Total: Vendor:2462 FOX TELEVISION STATIONS INC Check Sequence: 63 ACH Enabled: False KMSP Feb-12 KMSP February 2012 1,262.40 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 1,262.40Check Total: Vendor:2462 FOX TELEVISION STATIONS INC Check Sequence: 64 ACH Enabled: False AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 9 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference WFTC Feb-12 WFTC February 2012 157.80 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 157.80Check Total: Vendor:2274 FUEL Check Sequence: 65 ACH Enabled: False C71451 FUEL February 2012 64.56 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 64.56Check Total: Vendor:1740 BRAD FYLE Check Sequence: 66 ACH Enabled: False 2/24-2/26/12 Mileage/meals - CRMC Crosby MN - EMT Refresher 231.27 03/27/2012 101-42200-433100 231.27Check Total: Vendor:1194 G AND K SERVICES Check Sequence: 67 ACH Enabled: False 1043127677 Floor mats 31.14 03/27/2012 217-41990-431900 1043129538 Floor mats 53.97 03/27/2012 609-49754-431900 1043132637 Floor mats 31.14 03/27/2012 217-41990-431900 116.25Check Total: Vendor:1201 RAYMOND J GLUNZ Check Sequence: 68 ACH Enabled: False 469613 3/8/12 W. Stokes 400.00 03/27/2012 651-49010-431150 400.00Check Total: Vendor:2257 THE GOLF CHANNEL Check Sequence: 69 ACH Enabled: False 421117 The Golf Channel February 2012 383.88 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 383.88Check Total: Vendor:2257 THE GOLF CHANNEL Check Sequence: 70 ACH Enabled: False 421109 The Golf Channel HD February 2012 1.75 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 1.75Check Total: Vendor:1591 GRADY'S ACE HARDWARE Check Sequence: 71 ACH Enabled: False 878811 (3) clear 100w bulbs 12.15 03/27/2012 101-43127-421530 878834 (1) lampholder keyless bag; (2) PVC w/nails 19.5 cu 5.43 03/27/2012 602-49490-421990 879395 (1) 3/4x1000" freezer tape 3.52 03/27/2012 101-43127-421990 21.10Check Total: Vendor:2281 GREAT AMERICAN COUNTRY Check Sequence: 72 ACH Enabled: False Feb-12 GAC February 2012 111.00 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 10 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 111.00Check Total: Vendor:1641 H & L MESABI Check Sequence: 73 ACH Enabled: False 84903 Plow blade cutting edges - (13) insert blades; (3) curb run; ect 6,133.15 03/27/2012 101-43125-422460 6,133.15Check Total: Vendor:2433 NICHOLAS R HACKENMUELLER Check Sequence: 74 ACH Enabled: True 3/14/12 3/14/12 EDA mtg 50.00 03/27/2012 101-46500-431990 3/6/12 Planning Commission Meeting 3/6/12 50.00 03/27/2012 101-41910-431990 3/6/12 Safety Training 3/7/12 50.00 03/27/2012 101-41800-431990 150.00Check Total: Vendor:1219 RONALD G HACKENMUELLER Check Sequence: 75 ACH Enabled: False 3/8-3/9/12 ZZZNED - 3/9/12 Red Wing R.E.P. meeting- reimb hotel; mileage 185.95 03/27/2012 101-42500-433100 185.95Check Total: Vendor:2832 GERALD HARN Check Sequence: 76 ACH Enabled: False Refund FiberNet Monticello acct # 64815 10.77 03/27/2012 655-00000-115040 10.77Check Total: Vendor:1223 HAWKINS INC Check Sequence: 77 ACH Enabled: False 3317538 Chemical Product 7,425.88 03/27/2012 601-49440-421600 7,425.88Check Total: Vendor:1750 HBC HIAWATHA BROADBAND COMM INC Check Sequence: 78 ACH Enabled: True 6251 March 2012 contract 15,000.00 03/27/2012 655-49870-430700 15,000.00Check Total: Vendor:1224 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD Check Sequence: 79 ACH Enabled: False 4470653 (25) SR 5/8 reg ECR 100 cuft 1,108.56 03/27/2012 601-49440-422701 4470653 utx - freight 14.70 03/27/2012 601-49440-422701 4486342 (20) chambers 621.79 03/27/2012 601-49440-422701 4490162 utx - (1) autogun 190.50 03/27/2012 601-49440-422701 4500290 (57) cuft SR 5/8 reg ECR 3,268.63 03/27/2012 601-49440-422701 4528166 (330) rubber mtr washers 46.53 03/27/2012 601-49440-422701 5,250.71Check Total: AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 11 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor:1604 HEALTH PARTNERS Check Sequence: 80 ACH Enabled: False 39887431 4/1 - 4/30/12 Medical insurance 62,544.89 03/27/2012 101-00000-217060 39887431 4/1 - 4/30/12 Dental insurance 6,305.86 03/27/2012 101-00000-217062 68,850.75Check Total: Vendor:1226 HENRY'S WATERWORKS INC Check Sequence: 81 ACH Enabled: False 15642 (28) measuring chambers; (38) touch pads; ect 960.04 03/27/2012 601-49440-422701 960.04Check Total: Vendor:1242 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFICE Check Sequence: 82 ACH Enabled: False 03/18/12 Motor fuel 26.00 03/27/2012 101-42200-421200 03/18/12 Motor fuel 15.27 03/27/2012 101-42200-421200 03/18/12 Motor fuel 42.00 03/27/2012 101-42200-421200 03/18/12 Motor fuel 26.27 03/27/2012 101-42200-421200 03/18/12 Motor fuel 51.00 03/27/2012 101-42200-421200 03/18/12 Motor fuel 35.00 03/27/2012 101-42200-421200 03/18/12 Motor fuel 36.77 03/27/2012 101-42200-421200 03/18/12 Motor fuel 25.00 03/27/2012 226-45122-421200 03/18/12 Motor fuel credit 2/19/12 - 3/18/12 -26.61 03/27/2012 101-42200-421200 03/18/12 Motor fuel 45.35 03/27/2012 101-42200-421200 03/18/12 Motor fuel 41.14 03/27/2012 101-42200-421200 03/18/12 Motor fuel 50.89 03/27/2012 101-42200-421200 03/18/12 Motor fuel 49.00 03/27/2012 101-42200-421200 417.08Check Total: Vendor:1242 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFICE Check Sequence: 83 ACH Enabled: False 3/18/12 Snow Sweeper - Motor fuel 14.01 03/27/2012 226-45122-421200 3/18/12 Motor Fuel 42.00 03/27/2012 101-42200-421200 3/18/12 Motor fuel credit 2/24/12 - 2/28/12 -2.90 03/27/2012 101-42200-421200 53.11Check Total: Vendor:2276 HOME & GARDEN TELEVISION Check Sequence: 84 ACH Enabled: False Feb-12 HGTV February 2012 360.75 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 360.75Check Total: Vendor:2305 HOME BOX OFFICE Check Sequence: 85 ACH Enabled: False Feb-12 HBO February 2012 578.78 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 Feb-12 HBO Bulk February 2012 509.74 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 Feb-12 Cinemax February 2012 177.90 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 12 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Jan-12 Balance HBO January 2012 balance - correct rate 27.84 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 Jan-12 Balance Cinemax January 2012 balance - correct rate 8.53 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 1,302.79Check Total: Vendor:1243 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Check Sequence: 86 ACH Enabled: False 1022595 Customer premise - (3) Met Raceway acc pk; 5lb drywl screw; ect. 48.21 03/27/2012 656-49877-421990 1027201 C.H. front desk ledge - supplies 69.63 03/27/2012 101-41940-422990 1027331 (16) 1" PVC cap slip; (16) 1" PVC El 90D SXS 3.38 03/27/2012 226-45122-422990 11301 (4) 22" tool box; (4) stowaway organizer; ect. 83.80 03/27/2012 601-49440-424100 11330 Plan cabinet - hardwood plywood 75.82 03/27/2012 101-42400-421990 1231275 (10) 10' Raceway; (4) Access Pk 127.80 03/27/2012 656-49877-421990 2011090 Edmundson shed repair - (20) Vulkem; (4) 16oz Great Stuff; ect. 44.98 03/27/2012 101-43127-422300 2022241 Customer premise - (3) 2" conduit body; (4) 40x10ft SCH40; ect. 54.33 03/27/2012 656-49877-421990 2029510 (2) assorted 9" blades 8.53 03/27/2012 601-49440-421990 2230931 Refer to inv(s) 11301 & 224450 - (2) tool box; (2) organizer;-66.13 03/27/2012 601-49440-424100 224450 (2) tool box 55.51 03/27/2012 601-49440-424100 230678 Refer to inv 11301 - (2) tool box -32.00 03/27/2012 601-49440-424100 27539 (1) holesaw; (4) strap; (1) 1/4" pilot; (1) 1-1/2" coupling 28.06 03/27/2012 656-49877-421990 2992396 Chamber office - bathroom repair supplies 9.65 03/27/2012 101-45172-440100 3011009 C.H. front desk ledge - supplies 131.19 03/27/2012 101-41940-422990 3026606 Edmundson shed repair - HVAC seamer; (2) pk shims 35.19 03/27/2012 101-43127-422300 3026648 Edmundson shed repair - (1) 1/4 tapcon; (4) 1x6-6 #2 board; ect. 19.10 03/27/2012 101-43127-422300 3026736 Edmundson shed repair - (1) Schlage Geo combo pack; ect. 55.45 03/27/2012 101-43127-422300 3029253 Chamber office - vanity; faucet (Reimbursed 2/22/12 recpt 49669) 296.18 03/27/2012 101-45172-440100 3225029 Chamber office - bathroom repair supplies 19.72 03/27/2012 101-45172-440100 5225577 Customer premise - (2) Kingsford briquets 38.20 03/27/2012 656-49877-421990 581566 Customer premise - (4) thermostat guard; (1) aerosol paint; ect. 51.51 03/27/2012 656-49877-421990 6993260 (2) Husky med utility knife; (1) 2pp Rayovac 9V; ect. 23.41 03/27/2012 656-49877-421990 9027759 Screws; fitting; couplers; bushings; ect. 53.81 03/27/2012 101-45201-421650 1,235.33Check Total: Vendor:2833 LORRAINE HORN Check Sequence: 87 ACH Enabled: False Refund FiberNet Monticello acct # 64926 96.27 03/27/2012 655-00000-115040 96.27Check Total: Vendor:2214 HUBBARD BROADCASTING INC Check Sequence: 88 ACH Enabled: False KSTC Feb-12 KSTC February 2012 368.20 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 368.20Check Total: Vendor:2214 HUBBARD BROADCASTING INC Check Sequence: 89 ACH Enabled: False AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 13 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference KSTP Feb-12 KSTP February 2012 368.20 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 368.20Check Total: Vendor:1253 J H LARSON COMPANY Check Sequence: 90 ACH Enabled: False S100079930.001 (12) syl 120v 100w bulbs; (30) 28w lumens 187.91 03/27/2012 226-45122-422990 187.91Check Total: Vendor:1259 JJ TAYLOR DISTRUBTING Check Sequence: 91 ACH Enabled: False 1675196 return - beer -6.66 03/27/2012 609-49750-425200 1707253 3.00 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 1707253 554.74 03/27/2012 609-49750-425200 551.08Check Total: Vendor:1263 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR Check Sequence: 92 ACH Enabled: False 1246555 63.08 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 1246555 5,019.05 03/27/2012 609-49750-425100 1246556 29.89 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 1246556 1,068.20 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 1246556 re-sale 24.00 03/27/2012 609-49750-425400 1247345 8.34 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 1247345 829.95 03/27/2012 609-49750-425100 1247346 24.33 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 1247346 909.17 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 1249793 2.78 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 1249793 184.50 03/27/2012 609-49750-425100 1249794 28.26 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 1249794 963.02 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 1252416 20.85 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 1252416 1,622.22 03/27/2012 609-49750-425100 1252417 79.22 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 1252417 53.30 03/27/2012 609-49750-425200 1252417 2,438.35 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 1252417 re-sale 93.93 03/27/2012 609-49750-425400 1252418 1.39 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 1252418 20.99 03/27/2012 609-49750-425200 1254450 57.68 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 1254450 2,090.83 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 528259 -9.00 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 528954 -1.39 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 528954 -180.25 03/27/2012 609-49750-425100 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 14 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 528955 -1.39 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 528955 -41.35 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 15,399.95Check Total: Vendor:2251 KARE Check Sequence: 93 ACH Enabled: False 500676-20 KARE February 2012 946.80 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 946.80Check Total: Vendor:2843 MARYANN KING Check Sequence: 94 ACH Enabled: False Refund FiberNet Monticello acct # 69608 62.16 03/27/2012 655-00000-115040 62.16Check Total: Vendor:2163 KWIK TRIP CREDIT DEPARTMENT Check Sequence: 95 ACH Enabled: False 2/29/12 Motor fuel 42.97 03/27/2012 655-49870-421200 42.97Check Total: Vendor:2496 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY Check Sequence: 96 ACH Enabled: False 1018639020 (10) pk/bx assorted glv nitrile 140.34 03/27/2012 101-42200-421990 140.34Check Total: Vendor:1290 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES Check Sequence: 97 ACH Enabled: False 161565 4/26/12 Safety & Loss Control Workshop St Cloud - T.E. 20.00 03/27/2012 101-41800-433200 20.00Check Total: Vendor:1291 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST Check Sequence: 98 ACH Enabled: False 22304 End date 10/10/11 Final Audit 4,458.00 03/27/2012 101-49240-415100 22304 End date 10/10/11 Final Audit 27.00 03/27/2012 217-41990-415100 22304 End date 10/10/11 Final Audit 6,442.00 03/27/2012 101-42200-415100 22304 End date 10/10/11 Final Audit 75.00 03/27/2012 609-49754-415100 22304 End date 10/10/11 Final Audit -136.00 03/27/2012 601-49440-415100 22304 End date 10/10/11 Final Audit -137.00 03/27/2012 602-49490-415100 22304 End date 10/10/11 Final Audit 1,311.00 03/27/2012 655-49870-415100 22304 End date 10/10/11 Final Audit -1,666.00 03/27/2012 226-45122-415100 22304 End date 10/10/11 Final Audit 119.00 03/27/2012 651-49010-415100 10,493.00Check Total: Vendor:2837 DEBRA LEONARD Check Sequence: 99 ACH Enabled: False Refund FiberNet Monticello acct # 66098 10.14 03/27/2012 655-00000-115040 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 15 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 10.14Check Total: Vendor:2166 LIFETIME ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES LLC Check Sequence: 100 ACH Enabled: False 8370056 A & E Lifetime Network February 2012 555.00 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 555.00Check Total: Vendor:2166 LIFETIME ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES LLC Check Sequence: 101 ACH Enabled: False 8371577 A & E Lifetime Movie Network February 2012 259.00 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 259.00Check Total: Vendor:2166 LIFETIME ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES LLC Check Sequence: 102 ACH Enabled: False 8372161 A & E Lifetime Real Women February 2012 45.73 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 45.73Check Total: Vendor:1300 DOUGLAS WILLIAM LYSENG Check Sequence: 103 ACH Enabled: True 1227 Maestro All-in-One serial # 03132012A - Matt Theisen C168PW 1,314.89 03/27/2012 101-41920-424720 1227 G11 All-in-One serial # 03132012B - Heidi Eckerman C169CH 1,314.89 03/27/2012 101-41920-424720 1227 (2) Office Professional 2010 M. Theisen; H. Eckerman 748.11 03/27/2012 101-41920-430910 3,377.89Check Total: Vendor:1300 DOUGLAS WILLIAM LYSENG Check Sequence: 104 ACH Enabled: True 1221 Labor - Secuity camera upgrade 1,282.50 03/27/2012 609-00000-165010 1221 Equipment - Secuity camera upgrade 14,952.44 03/27/2012 609-00000-165010 16,234.94Check Total: Vendor:1303 M AMUNDSON LLP Check Sequence: 105 ACH Enabled: False 127664 re-sale 215.90 03/27/2012 609-49750-425400 127664 re-sale 323.16 03/27/2012 609-49750-425500 539.06Check Total: Vendor:1308 MARCO INC Check Sequence: 106 ACH Enabled: False 199176207 3/10 - 4/10/12 5,415.51 03/27/2012 101-41940-431900 5,415.51Check Total: Vendor:2025 MAYFLOWER DISTRIBUTING CO Check Sequence: 107 ACH Enabled: False 2384311P balloons; placemates; paper plates; napkins; ribbon 230.89 03/27/2012 226-45127-421460 3011582 balloons; placemates; paper plates 73.74 03/27/2012 226-45127-421460 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 16 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 304.63Check Total: Vendor:2265 MCCOMB GROUP LTD Check Sequence: 108 ACH Enabled: True 3996 ZEDTMS - Block 34 989.80 03/27/2012 213-46522-431990 989.80Check Total: Vendor:2265 MCCOMB GROUP LTD Check Sequence: 109 ACH Enabled: True 3995 ZEDTMS - Ace Hardware 780.91 03/27/2012 213-46522-431990 780.91Check Total: Vendor:2265 MCCOMB GROUP LTD Check Sequence: 110 ACH Enabled: True 3987 ZEDTMS - Ace Hardware 6,268.75 03/27/2012 213-46522-431990 6,268.75Check Total: Vendor:1318 JONATHAN CALEB MELLBERG Check Sequence: 111 ACH Enabled: True 3/12/12 City Council meeting recording 3/12/12 80.00 03/27/2012 101-41110-431990 80.00Check Total: Vendor:2215 METRO GOLDWYN MAYER INC Check Sequence: 112 ACH Enabled: False Feb-12 MGM HD February 2012 9.60 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 9.60Check Total: Vendor:2839 STEPHEN AND CATHRINE MEYERS Check Sequence: 113 ACH Enabled: False Refund FiberNet Monticello acct # 66569 46.60 03/27/2012 655-00000-115040 46.60Check Total: Vendor:1920 MFRA - MCCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOC INC Check Sequence: 114 ACH Enabled: False 70170 Services thru 2/29/12 - Zoning Ordinance Amendments; Amend Text 530.00 03/27/2012 101-41910-431990 530.00Check Total: Vendor:1328 MIDWAY IRON & METAL CO INC Check Sequence: 115 ACH Enabled: False 157265 (2) 10' steel flats; (11) round bars; (17) 20' steel angles; ect 1,869.13 03/27/2012 101-43127-421500 1,869.13Check Total: Vendor:1330 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS Check Sequence: 116 ACH Enabled: False 400413002831 (217) transactions - February 2012 130.20 03/27/2012 101-42100-431990 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 17 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 130.20Check Total: Vendor:2179 MINNESOTA 9-1-1 PROGRAM Check Sequence: 117 ACH Enabled: False Feb-12 February 2012 911 Wright Co 941.16 03/27/2012 655-00000-208170 941.16Check Total: Vendor:2217 MLB NETWORK LLC AFFILIATE SALE Check Sequence: 118 ACH Enabled: False 017439 MLB February 2012 259.93 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 259.93Check Total: Vendor:2094 MN STATE COMM & TECH COLLEGE Check Sequence: 119 ACH Enabled: False 3/8/12 3/10/12 Fire School in Detroit Lakes - B.F. 55.00 03/27/2012 101-42200-433200 55.00Check Total: Vendor:1369 MONTICELLO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Check Sequence: 120 ACH Enabled: False 4389a Chamber lunch - Small Business Financial Solutions - M.B.L. 15.00 03/27/2012 101-46500-433200 4416a Advertising in membership directory - full page 100.00 03/27/2012 655-49870-434990 4430a Insert - March 2012 city business newsletter 100.00 03/27/2012 213-46301-435200 215.00Check Total: Vendor:1371 MONTICELLO FIREMEN RELIEF ASSOC Check Sequence: 121 ACH Enabled: False 3/15/12 State of MN 3/15/12 EFT recpt 00050512 pass thru 1,000.00 03/27/2012 101-42202-334200 1,000.00Check Total: Vendor:1392 MONTICELLO NAPA Check Sequence: 122 ACH Enabled: False 512700 #301 - (1) tubes-step 247.19 03/27/2012 101-43120-422110 515483 (1) spreader; (1) JB weld; (1) mask tape; (2) etching primer 20.26 03/27/2012 101-45201-421650 516421 Shop tools - (1) thermometer 62.30 03/27/2012 101-43127-424100 517049 #105 - (3) flex tubing; (3) clamps 83.20 03/27/2012 101-43120-422110 412.95Check Total: Vendor:1376 MONTICELLO PUBLIC LIBRARY Check Sequence: 123 ACH Enabled: False 2/1-2/29/12 Monticello Chamber of Commerce membership 150.00 03/27/2012 211-45501-443300 2/1-2/29/12 Program supplies 81.16 03/27/2012 211-45501-421990 2/1-2/29/12 utx - Program supplies 135.95 03/27/2012 211-45501-421990 2/1-2/29/12 Program services 700.00 03/27/2012 211-45501-430150 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 18 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 1,067.11Check Total: Vendor:1377 MONTICELLO SENIOR CENTER Check Sequence: 124 ACH Enabled: True March 2012 Monthly appropriation 4,208.33 03/27/2012 101-45175-444310 4,208.33Check Total: Vendor:2478 MSNBC INC BANK OF AMERICA Check Sequence: 125 ACH Enabled: False 421110 MSNBC February 2012 476.38 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 476.38Check Total: Vendor:1390 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC Check Sequence: 126 ACH Enabled: False 830396-00 #455 mower - (1) V-belt; (2) joint balls; (2) foam filled wheels 600.87 03/27/2012 101-45201-422100 600.87Check Total: Vendor:2334 MTV NETWORKS Check Sequence: 127 ACH Enabled: False Feb-12 MTV VH1 February 2012 418.19 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 Feb-12 MTV VH1 Classic Rock February 2012 88.69 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 Feb-12 MTV TV Land February 2012 349.65 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 Feb-12 MTV TeenNick February 2012 88.69 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 Feb-12 MTV Spike February 2012 832.87 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 Feb-12 MTV Nicktoons - NTO February 2012 88.69 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 Feb-12 MTV Nickelodeon February 2012 1,393.98 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 Feb-12 MTV Nick Jr February 2012 41.88 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 Feb-12 MTV MTV2-MT2 February 2012 39.30 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 Feb-12 MTV MTV Hits February 2012 88.69 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 Feb-12 MTV February 2012 975.88 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 Feb-12 MTV Comedy Central-CMC February 2012 402.38 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 Feb-12 MTV CMT February 2012 279.07 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 5,087.96Check Total: Vendor:2485 MUN2 INC Check Sequence: 128 ACH Enabled: False 421111 MUN2 February 2012 45.73 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 421111 MUN2 Hispanic Tier January 2012 0.33 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 421111 MUN2 January 2012 46.41 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 421111 MUN2 Hispanic Tier February 2012 0.33 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 92.80Check Total: Vendor:2218 MUSIC CHOICE Check Sequence: 129 ACH Enabled: False AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 19 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Feb-12 Music Choice February 2012 186.72 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 186.72Check Total: Vendor:2275 NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC WILD Check Sequence: 130 ACH Enabled: False C72965 National Geographic Wild February 2012 50.00 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 50.00Check Total: Vendor:2072 NATIONAL TELCO TELEVISION CONSORTIUM Check Sequence: 131 ACH Enabled: False 683 NTTC - February 2012 22,141.75 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 22,141.75Check Total: Vendor:2486 NBC INC CABLE SATELLITE OLYMPICS BANK OF AMERICA Check Sequence: 132 ACH Enabled: False 421112 CNBC & MSNBC Olympics February 2012 138.76 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 138.76Check Total: Vendor:1150 NCH CORPORATION Check Sequence: 133 ACH Enabled: False 20553290 (100) split lock washers 3.14 03/27/2012 101-43127-421990 20559831 (200) nuts; (10) clamps; (100) washers; ect 333.52 03/27/2012 101-43127-421990 336.66Check Total: Vendor:1395 NEXTEL WEST CORP Check Sequence: 134 ACH Enabled: False 571273315-124 2/16 - 3/12/12 7.45 03/27/2012 101-42200-432100 571273315-124 2/16 - 3/12/12 34.26 03/27/2012 101-42400-432100 571273315-124 2/16 - 3/12/12 49.61 03/27/2012 101-42700-432100 571273315-124 2/16 - 3/12/12 81.12 03/27/2012 101-43110-432100 571273315-124 2/16 - 3/12/12 9.97 03/27/2012 101-43111-432100 571273315-124 2/16 - 3/12/12 16.83 03/27/2012 101-43115-432100 571273315-124 2/16 - 3/12/12 73.60 03/27/2012 101-43120-432100 571273315-124 2/16 - 3/12/12 142.85 03/27/2012 101-45201-432100 571273315-124 2/16 - 3/12/12 62.33 03/27/2012 226-45122-432100 571273315-124 2/16 - 3/12/12 134.77 03/27/2012 601-49440-432100 571273315-124 2/16 - 3/12/12 57.91 03/27/2012 602-49490-432100 571273315-124 2/16 - 3/12/12 575.68 03/27/2012 655-49870-432100 1,246.38Check Total: Vendor:2134 NFL NETWORK Check Sequence: 135 ACH Enabled: False 103193 NFL February 2012 866.68 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 20 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 866.68Check Total: Vendor:2216 NHL NETWORK Check Sequence: 136 ACH Enabled: False Feb-12 NHL February 2012 258.08 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 258.08Check Total: Vendor:2831 CARLENE NIEMAN Check Sequence: 137 ACH Enabled: False Refund FiberNet Monticello acct # 63525 71.89 03/27/2012 655-00000-115040 71.89Check Total: Vendor:1405 OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED Check Sequence: 138 ACH Enabled: False 378148 (1) dz sharpies; (1) dz blk markers; (1) pk labels; ect 48.90 03/27/2012 101-43110-420990 384378 (1) micro secure dig 2gb 9.62 03/27/2012 101-43110-420990 58.52Check Total: Vendor:1411 OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC INC Check Sequence: 139 ACH Enabled: False 44582 Refer to invoice 44393 - (1) additional ballast; (2) lamps 112.52 03/27/2012 101-45201-422300 44603 Women's locker room & main hall - lights supp/labor 357.80 03/27/2012 226-45122-440100 44607 Install security lmp; relocate switch; ect labor/supp 1,366.32 03/27/2012 101-43127-431990 1,836.64Check Total: Vendor:2488 OXYGEN BANK OF AMERICA Check Sequence: 140 ACH Enabled: False 421113 Oxygen February 2012 351.50 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 351.50Check Total: Vendor:1419 PAN O GOLD CO ST CLOUD Check Sequence: 141 ACH Enabled: False 010004206917 re-sale 29.88 03/27/2012 226-45127-425410 29.88Check Total: Vendor:1422 PARTS ASSOCIATES INC Check Sequence: 142 ACH Enabled: False PAI1080937 (48) IPC pnts & assort; (1) ntrle glves 362.30 03/27/2012 101-43127-421510 362.30Check Total: Vendor:1626 PAT KERNS WINE MERCHANTS Check Sequence: 143 ACH Enabled: False 8153 8.00 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 8153 216.00 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 21 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 224.00Check Total: Vendor:1674 JAMIE ANN PAULSON Check Sequence: 144 ACH Enabled: False 11735 (3) clothing 75.76 03/27/2012 101-42400-421110 11735 Embroidery - (3) name; (3) building dept crest logo 42.45 03/27/2012 101-42400-421110 118.21Check Total: Vendor:1273 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO Check Sequence: 145 ACH Enabled: False 8342041-IN 22.50 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 8342041-IN 1,639.84 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 8342059-IN 2.25 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 8342059-IN 69.31 03/27/2012 609-49750-425100 1,733.90Check Total: Vendor:2255 CHILDRENS NETWORK LLC PBS KIDS SPROUT Check Sequence: 146 ACH Enabled: False 421115 PBS Kids Sprout February 2012 28.25 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 28.25Check Total: Vendor:2841 PHILIP AND JADE PERERE Check Sequence: 147 ACH Enabled: False Refund FiberNet Monticello acct # 68733 39.61 03/27/2012 655-00000-115040 39.61Check Total: Vendor:1425 PETERSON GRIMSMO CHAPEL Check Sequence: 148 ACH Enabled: False Jan Feb 2012 Cemetery caretaker 700.00 03/27/2012 651-49010-431100 700.00Check Total: Vendor:2569 PHILIPS HEALTH CARE Check Sequence: 149 ACH Enabled: False 923956142 Batteries & new pads for AED's 409.33 03/27/2012 226-45122-422990 409.33Check Total: Vendor:1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO Check Sequence: 150 ACH Enabled: False 2205301 14.82 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 2205301 898.52 03/27/2012 609-49750-425100 2205302 freight only - n/c on delivered tx misc item 2.78 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 2205947 31.27 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 2205947 1,373.00 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 2207786 4.17 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 2207786 132.75 03/27/2012 609-49750-425100 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 22 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 2208680 47.26 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 2208680 3,290.74 03/27/2012 609-49750-425100 2208681 40.31 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 2208681 1,433.00 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 2209766 16.68 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 2209766 512.45 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 2211195 38.92 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 2211195 1,753.25 03/27/2012 609-49750-425100 2211196 1.39 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 2211196 re-sale 56.00 03/27/2012 609-49750-425400 3478486 -1.39 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 3478486 -48.00 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 3478863 -1.39 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 3478863 -64.00 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 9,532.53Check Total: Vendor:1852 POWER & TEL Check Sequence: 151 ACH Enabled: True 5163414-00 utx - (5000) cable CAT5E 4PR; (200) 8-POS 110 IDS block CAT5E 1,318.48 03/27/2012 656-49877-421800 1,318.48Check Total: Vendor:1444 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO Check Sequence: 152 ACH Enabled: False 582515-00 9.20 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 582515-00 65.68 03/27/2012 609-49750-425100 582515-00 re-sale 35.60 03/27/2012 609-49750-425500 582515-00 144.00 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 582645-00 13.80 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 582645-00 831.24 03/27/2012 609-49750-425100 584875-00 20.70 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 584875-00 427.03 03/27/2012 609-49750-425100 584875-00 204.32 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 1,751.57Check Total: Vendor:1452 RCB ASSOCIATES INC Check Sequence: 153 ACH Enabled: False 84540 #130 - replace mic 126.99 03/27/2012 101-43120-431990 84555 #205 - repair power supply; test 90.12 03/27/2012 101-45201-422100 84592 Customer premise -(3) Data air installs 10/27; 12/22/11; 1/13/12 330.00 03/27/2012 656-49877-431990 84593 #130 - (1) spkr; (1) mic; labor/replaced bnd parts 170.81 03/27/2012 101-43127-431990 84604 #205 - (1) mic & labor 138.74 03/27/2012 101-45201-422110 84605 #214 - (1) conn & labor 50.88 03/27/2012 101-45201-422110 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 23 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 907.54Check Total: Vendor:1453 RECREATION SUPPLY COMPANY Check Sequence: 154 ACH Enabled: False 235597 (6) basketball nets; (1) turtle play raft 157.43 03/27/2012 226-45127-421750 236430 Swim lesson supplies - (18) turtle tiles; (5) male edge; ect 275.64 03/27/2012 226-45127-421980 236776 (1) 2" washer 8.39 03/27/2012 226-45122-421610 236776 Circulating pumps - (4) pressure gauges 44.03 03/27/2012 211-45501-422300 485.49Check Total: Vendor:1455 RED'S MARATHON Check Sequence: 155 ACH Enabled: False 2/28/12 #215 bobcat 74.81 03/27/2012 101-45201-421200 2/28/12 13.24 03/27/2012 101-42200-421200 2/28/12 utx - (1) battery 100.00 03/27/2012 101-43127-422100 2/28/12 (1) battery 128.25 03/27/2012 101-45201-422110 2/28/12 37.60 03/27/2012 217-41990-421200 2/28/12 29.50 03/27/2012 217-41990-421200 2/28/12 34.50 03/27/2012 217-41990-421200 417.90Check Total: Vendor:2202 REDSTONE CONSTRUCTION CO INC Check Sequence: 156 ACH Enabled: False Voucher 7 11C001 - 2011 Street Reconstruction 80,017.28 03/27/2012 400-43300-459010 80,017.28Check Total: Vendor:2602 RFD TV Check Sequence: 157 ACH Enabled: False 1646-1232 RFD TV February 2012 41.70 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 41.70Check Total: Vendor:1474 PATRICIA A SALZWEDEL Check Sequence: 158 ACH Enabled: True 3/31/12 Contract 1,520.13 03/27/2012 101-42700-431200 1,520.13Check Total: Vendor:1475 SCHARBER & SONS INC Check Sequence: 159 ACH Enabled: False 1091457 (2) cap screws; (2) pins; (2) bushings; (2) nuts 93.90 03/27/2012 101-45201-422100 1091706 (1) plug 2.24 03/27/2012 101-42200-421990 96.14Check Total: Vendor:1481 ANGELA SCHUMANN Check Sequence: 160 ACH Enabled: True 1/20-2/27/12 Reimb additional pizza for 2/27/12 CC/PC/EDA mtg 16.03 03/27/2012 213-46301-443990 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 24 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 1/20-2/27/12 Reimb 1/20/12 Target recpt - (2) frames - Betty plague; picture 20.28 03/27/2012 101-41940-443990 36.31Check Total: Vendor:2834 DORIS SHERRITT Check Sequence: 161 ACH Enabled: False Refund FiberNet Monticello acct # 65088 51.77 03/27/2012 655-00000-115040 51.77Check Total: Vendor:2301 SHOWTIME NETWORKS INC Check Sequence: 162 ACH Enabled: False Feb-12 Showtime February 2012 (remaining balance of credit) 74.85 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 74.85Check Total: Vendor:1489 MARC SIMPSON Check Sequence: 163 ACH Enabled: False 3/10/12 (1) wringer bucket; (1) microfiber tube mop; (1) tube mop refill 101.44 03/27/2012 101-42200-421100 101.44Check Total: Vendor:2212 SINCLAIR TELEVISION GROUP INC Check Sequence: 164 ACH Enabled: False Feb-12 WUCW February 2012 284.04 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 284.04Check Total: Vendor:2844 SCOTT AND TONYA SMITH Check Sequence: 165 ACH Enabled: False Refund FiberNet Monticello acct #70480 14.66 03/27/2012 655-00000-115040 14.66Check Total: Vendor:2155 SOUTH CAROLINA NET INC Check Sequence: 166 ACH Enabled: False 259030 C.A.L.E.A. 3/1-3/31/12 656.43 03/27/2012 655-49870-431970 656.43Check Total: Vendor:2842 BILL AND LAURA SPARTZ Check Sequence: 167 ACH Enabled: False Refund FiberNet Monticello acct # 69302 13.25 03/27/2012 655-00000-115040 13.25Check Total: Vendor:1497 SPECTRUM SUPPLY COMPANY Check Sequence: 168 ACH Enabled: False 217420 (1) 6/1 gal dist water; (1) cs coffee filters 21.43 03/27/2012 226-45127-425410 217643 (1) cs kleenex 53.23 03/27/2012 101-41940-421990 217644 (10) bx dsp gloves; (1) cs foam cups; (1) cs 9" plates 118.88 03/27/2012 226-45127-425410 217645 (1) 3/1250ml handwash; (4) 3/1250ml hair & body wash; (3) lids 320.37 03/27/2012 226-45122-421990 217645 (2) 5/bag sponges; (1) 12/1 qt phos cleaner; (2) cs wipes; ect 273.88 03/27/2012 226-45122-421100 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 25 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 217842 (5) cs 9" tissue; (5) cs towels; (2) 3/1250ml handwash; ect 909.59 03/27/2012 226-45122-421990 217842 (1) cs bleach; (3) cs can liners; (2) cs wipes; ect 431.72 03/27/2012 226-45122-421100 217843 (10) bx dsp gloves; (1) cs 9" plates 99.98 03/27/2012 226-45127-425410 217845 (5) cs kitchen towels 128.25 03/27/2012 101-43127-421100 2,357.33Check Total: Vendor:2826 ST CLOUD MEDICAL GROUP PA Check Sequence: 169 ACH Enabled: False Statemt ID 8602 1/31/12 Office consultation 470.00 03/27/2012 101-49240-436990 470.00Check Total: Vendor:2835 CHUCK AND DONNA STRICKLAND Check Sequence: 170 ACH Enabled: False Refund FiberNet Monticello acct # 65166 10.08 03/27/2012 655-00000-115040 10.08Check Total: Vendor:2480 SYFY BANK OF AMERICA Check Sequence: 171 ACH Enabled: False 421116 SYFY February 2012 388.50 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 388.50Check Total: Vendor:2829 TAB BANK Check Sequence: 172 ACH Enabled: False 36217 Sunray Printing - (16) new plates; ect. 438.19 03/27/2012 101-41940-431950 438.19Check Total: Vendor:1518 TDS TELECOM Check Sequence: 173 ACH Enabled: False 271-3230 3/12 167.55 03/27/2012 655-49870-432100 271-3248 3/12 11.50 03/27/2012 217-41990-432100 271-3257 3/12 93.04 03/27/2012 602-49490-432100 271-7112 3/12 54.33 03/27/2012 226-45122-432100 295-2005 3/12 36.71 03/27/2012 101-43110-432100 295-3714 3/12 133.18 03/27/2012 601-49440-432100 295-3714 3/12 E Cty Rd lift station 271-3251 20.66 03/27/2012 602-49490-432100 655-837-0005 Voice - nonpublished number charges 241.73 03/27/2012 655-49860-430910 655-837-0005 Voice - LNP conversion charges 280.00 03/27/2012 655-49870-432600 1,038.70Check Total: Vendor:1518 TDS TELECOM Check Sequence: 174 ACH Enabled: False 655-837-0005 Voice - LNP conversion charges 225.00 03/27/2012 655-49870-432600 655-837-0005 Voice - nonpublished number charges 240.00 03/27/2012 655-49860-430910 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 26 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 465.00Check Total: Vendor:2277 TELEVISION FOOD NETWORK Check Sequence: 175 ACH Enabled: False Feb-12 Food Network February 2012 360.75 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 360.75Check Total: Vendor:1522 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Check Sequence: 176 ACH Enabled: False 678072CRD x/ref w/#678072 paid 3/13/12 -18.50 03/27/2012 609-49750-425200 679055 11,222.15 03/27/2012 609-49750-425200 11,203.65Check Total: Vendor:2614 TITAN MACHINERY Check Sequence: 177 ACH Enabled: False VC02709 #103 - (4) cs lamps; (4) cs bulbs; (2) cs MS-42 DPrack 322.53 03/27/2012 101-43120-422100 322.53Check Total: Vendor:2252 TOWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY Check Sequence: 178 ACH Enabled: False 281301 WGN February 2012 245.93 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 245.93Check Total: Vendor:2165 TV GUIDE NETWORKS LLC TV GUIDE ENTERTAINMENT GROUP LLC Check Sequence: 179 ACH Enabled: False 081369 TV Guide Network February 2012 402.85 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 402.85Check Total: Vendor:1539 UNITED LABORATORIES Check Sequence: 180 ACH Enabled: False 5675 utx - (6) gal gold tar remover 467.90 03/27/2012 101-43127-421600 467.90Check Total: Vendor:2483 UNIVERSAL HD BANK OF AMERICA Check Sequence: 181 ACH Enabled: False 421119 Universal HD February 2012 19.25 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 19.25Check Total: Vendor:1544 US POSTAL SERVICE Check Sequence: 182 ACH Enabled: False 3/7/12 Deposit Permit #42 - UB delinquent notices (1/2) 202.25 03/27/2012 601-49440-432200 3/7/12 Deposit Permit #42 - UB delinquent notices (1/2) 202.25 03/27/2012 602-49490-432200 404.50Check Total: AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 27 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor:1544 US POSTAL SERVICE Check Sequence: 183 ACH Enabled: False 3/14/12 Deposit Permit #99 - FNM mailer (printed by Majirs!) 404.27 03/27/2012 655-49870-432200 404.27Check Total: Vendor:2477 USA NETWORK BANK OF AMERICA Check Sequence: 184 ACH Enabled: False 422763 USA Network February 2012 1,119.25 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 1,119.25Check Total: Vendor:2534 VAULTAS ALEXANDRIA LLC Check Sequence: 185 ACH Enabled: False 1137 Data - DOA Transport April 2012 2,250.00 03/27/2012 655-49860-430930 1137 Data - XO Comm connection April 2012 250.00 03/27/2012 655-49860-430930 2,500.00Check Total: Vendor:1549 VEOLIA ES SOLID WASTE MIDWEST LLC Check Sequence: 186 ACH Enabled: False G20001117363 February 2012 30,921.51 03/27/2012 101-43230-431000 G20001117363 February 2012 10,253.25 03/27/2012 101-43230-431010 G20001117363 February 2012 101.72 03/27/2012 655-49870-431000 G20001117363 February 2012 34.00 03/27/2012 655-49870-431010 G20001117363 February 2012 35.10 03/27/2012 101-43127-431000 G20001117363 February 2012 70.20 03/27/2012 101-45201-431000 G20001117363 February 2012 111.15 03/27/2012 602-49480-431000 G20001117363 February 2012 204.75 03/27/2012 226-45122-431000 G20001117363 February 2012 11.70 03/27/2012 211-45501-431000 G20001117363 February 2012 23.40 03/27/2012 609-49754-431000 41,766.78Check Total: Vendor:1550 VEOLIA WATER N AM OPERATING SERV LLC VEOLIA WATER N AM OPERATIONS INC Check Sequence: 187 ACH Enabled: False 00012400 April 2012 64,399.08 03/27/2012 602-49480-430800 64,399.08Check Total: Vendor:1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Check Sequence: 188 ACH Enabled: False 25222135 re-sale 94.40 03/27/2012 609-49750-425400 25222246 re-sale 257.30 03/27/2012 609-49750-425400 351.70Check Total: Vendor:1684 VINOCOPIA Check Sequence: 189 ACH Enabled: False 53233-IN 5.00 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 53233-IN 176.00 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 28 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 181.00Check Total: Vendor:1556 WAL-MART BUSINESS Check Sequence: 190 ACH Enabled: False 3/9/12 (3) basketballs 25.52 03/27/2012 226-45127-421730 3/9/12 re-sale 35.90 03/27/2012 226-45127-425410 3/9/12 re-sale 1.32 03/27/2012 226-45127-425410 3/9/12 18.00 03/27/2012 226-45127-421460 3/9/12 fresh floral (dance); brach clsts; cookies 23.71 03/27/2012 226-45127-421980 3/9/12 pens; storage tape 7.32 03/27/2012 226-45122-420990 111.77Check Total: Vendor:1561 WATER LABORATORIES INC Check Sequence: 191 ACH Enabled: False 2914 February 2012 Water Samples 150.00 03/27/2012 601-49440-422740 150.00Check Total: Vendor:1567 WES OLSON ELECTRIC LLC Check Sequence: 192 ACH Enabled: False 5381 Supplies to install outside cameras; inspection fee 196.89 03/27/2012 609-49754-431990 5381 Labor - installed outside camers 375.00 03/27/2012 609-49754-431990 571.89Check Total: Vendor:2566 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT Check Sequence: 193 ACH Enabled: False 44129-IN (2) 500 series reel repair kits 27.50 03/27/2012 101-43127-422100 27.50Check Total: Vendor:2651 WILSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES LLC Check Sequence: 194 ACH Enabled: False 22727 ZEDTMS - Acquisition & Relocatoin Serv - Montgomery Farms 2,367.23 03/27/2012 213-46522-431990 2,367.23Check Total: Vendor:1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC Check Sequence: 195 ACH Enabled: False 401261 19.46 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 401261 1,090.75 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 1,110.21Check Total: Vendor:1209 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE & SPIRITS Check Sequence: 196 ACH Enabled: False 713731 15.95 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 713731 1,175.21 03/27/2012 609-49750-425100 713732 4.35 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 713732 291.75 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 29 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 716807 27.55 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 716807 2,002.96 03/27/2012 609-49750-425100 716808 10.15 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 716808 875.75 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 855536 -73.68 03/27/2012 609-49750-425100 856135 -1.57 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 856135 -179.00 03/27/2012 609-49750-425100 4,149.42Check Total: Vendor:2556 WOLD ARCHITECTS INC Check Sequence: 197 ACH Enabled: False 38806 11C006 - Natatorium Improvemts Ph 2 - Contract 2,130.00 03/27/2012 226-45122-453010 38806 11C006 - Natatorium Improvemts Ph 2 - Reimbursables 459.80 03/27/2012 226-45122-453010 2,589.80Check Total: Vendor:1657 WORLD CLASS WINES INC Check Sequence: 198 ACH Enabled: False 1724034 7.83 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 1724034 754.13 03/27/2012 609-49750-425100 1724034 191.01 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 1724052 10.00 03/27/2012 609-49750-433300 1724052 34.24 03/27/2012 609-49750-425100 1724052 684.00 03/27/2012 609-49750-425300 1,681.21Check Total: Vendor:2219 WORLD FISHING NETWORK LTD Check Sequence: 199 ACH Enabled: False 415-1012 World Fishing February 2012 45.73 03/27/2012 655-49860-430920 45.73Check Total: Vendor:2645 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS Check Sequence: 200 ACH Enabled: False 3/13/12 155-015-002150 - 2012 asmt portion due 591.10 03/27/2012 300-00000-361010 591.10Check Total: Vendor:1577 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS - ACH Check Sequence: 201 ACH Enabled: True 3/9/12 Fines and Fees EFT rec[t 00050371 3/12/12 5,948.26 03/27/2012 101-00000-208020 5,948.26Check Total: Vendor:1579 WRIGHT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Check Sequence: 202 ACH Enabled: False 6650 signs & supplies 77.42 03/27/2012 101-43120-422600 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 30 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 77.42Check Total: Vendor:1583 WRIGHT HENNEPIN COOP ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Check Sequence: 203 ACH Enabled: False 3/8/12 2/1 - 3/1/12 118.35 03/27/2012 602-49490-438100 3/8/12 May service 21.32 03/27/2012 217-41990-431900 3/8/12 May service 38.96 03/27/2012 101-45203-431900 3/8/12 May service 29.87 03/27/2012 101-42200-431900 3/8/12 May service 21.32 03/27/2012 601-49440-431900 3/8/12 May service 29.87 03/27/2012 226-45122-431900 3/8/12 May service 35.22 03/27/2012 601-49440-431900 3/8/12 May service 21.32 03/27/2012 601-49440-431900 3/8/12 May service 21.32 03/27/2012 601-49440-431900 3/8/12 May service 29.87 03/27/2012 101-41940-431900 3/8/12 May service 21.32 03/27/2012 101-45201-431900 3/8/12 1,365.37 03/27/2012 101-43160-438100 1,754.11Check Total: Vendor:1585 XCEL ENERGY Check Sequence: 204 ACH Enabled: False 3/13/12 51-4400193-4 16.05 03/27/2012 101-43160-438100 3/16/12 51-6505909-4 153.46 03/27/2012 217-41990-438100 3/5/12 51-6505914-1 1,147.26 03/27/2012 101-43127-438100 3/5/12 51-6505915-2 1,927.89 03/27/2012 101-45201-438100 3/5/12 51-6505915-2 260.72 03/27/2012 601-49440-438100 3/5/12 51-6505915-2 35.96 03/27/2012 226-45203-438100 3/5/12 51-6505915-2 62.71 03/27/2012 101-45203-438100 3/6/12 51-6505906-1 1,564.61 03/27/2012 602-49490-438100 5,168.66Check Total: Vendor:1907 XO COMMUNICATIONS LLC Check Sequence: 205 ACH Enabled: True 0249474262 Data - www access 3/1-3/31/12 7,589.50 03/27/2012 655-49860-430930 7,589.50Check Total: Vendor:1907 XO COMMUNICATIONS LLC Check Sequence: 206 ACH Enabled: True 0249474270 Data - www access 3/1-3/31/12 9,269.70 03/27/2012 655-49860-430930 9,269.70Check Total: Vendor:2076 ZAYO BANDWIDTH LLC Check Sequence: 207 ACH Enabled: False 3293 3/12 Voice - back office services 3/1-3-31/12 1,932.00 03/27/2012 655-49860-430910 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 31 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 1,932.00Check Total: Vendor:1588 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE Check Sequence: 208 ACH Enabled: False 54037377 H.E. - Advil; Aleve; (1) 120 box Clean & Safe disp; ect 86.95 03/27/2012 656-49877-421990 86.95Check Total: Vendor:2702 DAVE ZELAZNY Check Sequence: 209 ACH Enabled: True 3/6/12 Mileage reimbursement 1/12/12 thru 3/6/12 26.64 03/27/2012 226-45122-433100 26.64Check Total: Total for Check Run: Total of Number of Checks: 607,345.81 209 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (03/21/2012 - 1:24 PM)Page 32 CityCouncilAgenda:03/26/12 1 5B.ConsiderationofapprovingnewhiresanddeparturesforCitydepartments (TE) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: TheCouncilisaskedtoratifythehiringanddeparturesofemployeesthathaveoccurred recentlyinthedepartmentslisted.ItisrecommendedthattheCouncilofficiallyratifythe hiring/departureofalllistedemployeesincludingpart-timeandseasonalworkers. A1.BudgetImpact:(positionsaregenerallyincludedinbudget) A2.StaffWorkLoadImpact:Ifnewpositions,theremaybesometraining involved.Ifterminatedpositions,existingstaffwouldpickupthosehours,as needed,untilreplaced. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Motiontoratifythehire/departuresoftheemployeesasidentifiedontheattached list. 2.Motiontodenytherecommendedhiresanddepartures. C.RECOMMENDATION: BystatutetheCityCouncilhastheauthoritytoapproveallhires/departures.Citystaff recommendsAlternative#1,fortheCounciltoapprovethehiresand/ordeparturesas listed. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Listofnew/terminatedemployees Name Title Department Hire Date Class Theresa Adams Certified Fitness Instructor MCC 3/21 PT Name Reason Department Last Day Class NEW EMPLOYEES TERMINATING EMPLOYEES Book1: 3/21/2012 CityCouncilAgenda:03/26/12 1 5C.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2012-026acceptingacontributionfromTom PerraultfortheGeneralFund (CS) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: TomPerraultiscontributing$250forMarchtogointotheGeneralFund.Asrequiredby statestatute,iftheCityacceptsthedonationoffunds,theCityCouncilneedstoadopta resolutionspecifyingtheamountofthedonationanditsuse. A1.BudgetImpact:None A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Staffaccountsforandreconcilesdonationscontributed throughtheCity. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Approvethecontributionsandauthorizeuseoffundsasspecified. 2.Donotapprovethecontributionsandreturnthefundstothedonors. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: Staffrecommendationistoadopttheresolutionacceptingthecontributions. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Resolution#2012-026 CityofMonticello RESOLUTIONNO.2012-026 APPROVINGCONTRIBUTIONS WHEREAS,theCityofMonticelloisgenerallyauthorizedtoaccept contributionsofrealandpersonalpropertypursuanttoMinnesotaStatutesSections 465.03and465.04forthebenefitofitscitizensandisspecificallyauthorizedtomaintain suchpropertyforthebenefitofitscitizensinaccordancewiththetermsprescribedbythe donor.SaidgiftsmaybelimitedunderprovisionsofMNStatutesSection471.895. WHEREAS,thefollowingpersonsandorentitieshaveofferedtocontribute contributionsorgiftstotheCityaslisted: DONOR/ENTITYDESCRIPTIONVALUE TomPerraultCash$250 WHEREAS,allsaidcontributionsareintendedtoaidtheCityinestablishing facilities,operationsorprogramswithinthecity’sjurisdictioneitheraloneorin cooperationwithothers,asallowedbylaw;and WHEREAS,theCityCouncilherebyfindsthatitisappropriatetoacceptthe contributionsoffered. NOWTHEREFOREBEITRESOLVED bytheCityCouncilofMonticelloas follows: 1.ThecontributionsdescribedaboveareherebyacceptedbytheCityof Monticello. 2.Thecontributionsdescribedabovewillbeusedasdesignatedbythe donor.Thismayentailreimbursingorallocatingthemoneytoanother entitythatwillutilizethefundsforthefollowingstatedpurpose: DONOR/ENTITYRECIPIENTPURPOSE TomPerraultCityofMonticelloGeneralfund(March) AdoptedbytheCityCouncilofMonticellothis26thdayofMarch,2012. CITYOFMONTICELLO ______________________________ ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________________ JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator CityCouncilAgenda:03/26/2012 1 5D.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2012-027reestablishingthesameprecinct andpollingplacefortheCityofMonticello2012elections (CS) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: CityCouncilisaskedtoadoptaresolutiontoreestablishthesameprecinctandpolling placefortheCityofMonticelloaswehadestablishedforthelastelection.Afteran officialU.S.censusiscompleted,eachstateisrequiredtoredistrictlegislativeand congressionaldistrictsasdefinedinstateredistrictinglegislation(MNStatute204B.14). Partofthisprocessrequirescitiesandcountiestoredistrictinkeepingwithcertainrules andboundaries.TheCitymustapprovearesolutiondefiningourprecinctsandpolling placesandprovideacopyofthatresolutiontoWrightCountysothattheycancommence theirredistrictingprocess. TheCityconfirmeditsboundariesaspartoftheU.S.Censusandthoseboundarieswere officiallyapprovedin2011withnochangesintheprecinctboundariesthatwereinplace forthe2010elections.TheCityplanstocontinuewithjustoneprecinct,definedasthe municipalboundaries,andwouldprefertocontinueusingtheMonticelloCommunity Centerasitspollingplace.Byapprovingtheattachedresolution,theCouncilwouldbe reestablishingthesameprecinctandpollingplaceaswepreviouslyhadinplace.This followsrequirementsinstatestatutesandelectionsrules. A1.BudgetImpact:none A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:none B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2012-027reestablishingtheentireCityasasingle precinctandtheofficialpollingplaceastheMonticelloCommunityCenter. 2.Motionofother. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1withnochangesintheprecinctorthepollingplace fromthelastelection.TheCityisrequiredtoprovidearesolutionpriortoApril3rdto WrightCountyestablishingourprecinctandpollingplace. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Resolution#2012-027 SecretaryofStateRule4.3.2–Municipalitieswithonlyoneprecinct MNStatutes204B.14–ElectionPrecincts CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTIONNO.2012-027 REESTABLISHINGTHESAMEPRECINCTANDPOLLINGPLACEFOR THECITYOFMONTICELLO2012ELECTIONS WHEREAS,thelegislatureoftheStateofMinnesotahasbeenredistricted;and WHEREAS,MinnesotaStatute204B.14,subd.3(d)requiresthatprecinctboundariesmustbe reestablishedwithin60daysoflegislativeredistrictingoratleast19weeksbeforethestate primaryelection,whichevercomesfirst;and WHEREAS,theboundariesoftheCityofMonticello(PrecinctCode0125)whichconsistsofthe territoryoftheCityofMonticello,remainsunchangedfollowingstatelegislativeredistricting;and WHEREAS,thepollingplacefortheCityofMonticellowaspreviouslyestablishedasthe MonticelloCommunityCenter,505WalnutStreet,Monticello,Minnesota. NOW,THEREFOREBEITRESOLVED,thattheCityCounciloftheCityofMonticello reestablishesthevotingprecinctasthemunicipalboundariesoftheCityofMonticelloas identifiedinthe2010Census;and BEITFURTHERRESOLVED,thattheCouncilreestablishesthepollingplacefortheCityof MonticelloastheMonticelloCommunityCenterat505WalnutStreet. ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis26th dayofMarch,2012. CITYOFMONTICELLO __________________________________ ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator 1 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2011 204B.14 204B.14 ELECTION PRECINCTS. Subdivision 1.Boundaries.The governing body of each municipality shall establish the boundaries of the election precincts in the municipality.The governing body of a county shall establish the boundaries of precincts in unorganized territory in the county.Except as provided in subdivision 3,a governing body may change the boundaries of any election precinct which it has established. Subd.1a.Legislative policy.It is the intention of the legislature to complete congressional and legislative redistricting activities in time to permit counties and municipalities to begin the process of reestablishing precinct boundaries as soon as possible after the adoption of the congressional and legislative redistricting plans but in no case later than 25 weeks before the state primary election in the year ending in two. Subd.2.Separate precincts;combined polling place.(a)The following shall constitute at least one election precinct: (1)each city ward;and (2)each town and each statutory city. (b)A single,accessible,combined polling place may be established no later than May 1 of any year: (1)for any city of the third or fourth class,any town,or any city having territory in more than one county,in which all the voters of the city or town shall cast their ballots; (2)for contiguous precincts in the same municipality; (3)for up to four contiguous municipalities located entirely outside the metropolitan area,as defined by section 200.02,subdivision 24,that are contained in the same county;or (4)for noncontiguous precincts located in one or more counties. A copy of the ordinance or resolution establishing a combined polling place must be filed with the county auditor within 30 days after approval by the governing body.A polling place combined under clause (3)must be approved by the governing body of each participating municipality.A polling place combined under clause (4)must be approved by the governing body of each participating municipality and the secretary of state and may be located outside any of the noncontiguous precincts.A municipality withdrawing from participation in a combined polling place must do so by filing a resolution of withdrawal with the county auditor no later than April 1 of any year. The secretary of state shall provide a separate polling place roster for each precinct served by the combined polling place.A single set of election judges may be appointed to serve at a combined polling place.The number of election judges required must be based on the total number of persons voting at the last similar election in all precincts to be voting at the combined polling place.Separate ballot boxes must be provided for the ballots from each precinct.The results of the election must be reported separately for each precinct served by the combined polling place,except in a polling place established under clause (2)where one of the precincts has fewer than ten registered voters,in which case the results of that precinct must be reported in the manner specified by the secretary of state. Copyright ©2011 by the Office of the Revisor of Statutes,State of Minnesota.All Rights Reserved. 2 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2011 204B.14 Subd.3.Boundary changes;prohibitions;exception.Notwithstanding other law or charter provisions to the contrary,during the period from January 1 in any year ending in zero to the time when the legislature has been redistricted in a year ending in one or two,no changes may be made in the boundaries of any election precinct except as provided in this subdivision. (a)If a city annexes an unincorporated area located in the same county as the city and adjacent to the corporate boundary,the annexed area may be included in an election precinct immediately adjacent to it. (b)A municipality or county may establish new election precincts lying entirely within the boundaries of any existing precinct and shall assign names to the new precincts which include the name of the former precinct. (c)Precinct boundaries in a city of the first class electing council members by wards may be reestablished within four weeks of the adoption of ward boundaries in a year ending in one,as provided in section 204B.135,subdivision 1. (d)Precinct boundaries must be reestablished within 60 days of the time when the legislature has been redistricted,or at least 19 weeks before the state primary election in a year ending in two,whichever comes first.The adoption of reestablished precinct boundaries becomes effective on the date of the state primary election in the year ending in two. Precincts must be arranged so that no precinct lies in more than one legislative or congressional district. Subd.4.Boundary change procedure.Any change in the boundary of an election precinct must be adopted at least ten weeks before the date of the next election and,for the state primary and general election,no later than June 1 in the year of the state general election.The precinct boundary change shall not take effect until notice of the change has been posted in the office of the municipal clerk or county auditor for at least 56 days. The county auditor must publish a notice illustrating or describing the congressional, legislative,and county commissioner district boundaries in the county in one or more qualified newspapers in the county at least 14 days before the first day to file affidavits of candidacy for the state general election in the year ending in two. Alternate dates for adopting changes in precinct boundaries,posting notices of boundary changes,and notifying voters affected by boundary changes pursuant to this subdivision,and procedures for coordinating precinct boundary changes with reestablishing local government election district boundaries may be established in the manner provided in the rules of the secretary of state. Subd.4a.Municipal boundary adjustment procedure.A change in the boundary of an election precinct that has occurred as a result of a municipal boundary adjustment made under chapter 414 that is effective more than 21 days before a regularly scheduled election takes effect at the scheduled election. A change in the boundary of an election precinct that has occurred as a result of a municipal boundary adjustment made under chapter 414 that is effective less than 21 days before a regularly scheduled election takes effect the day after the scheduled election. Subd.5.Precinct boundaries;description;maps.If a precinct boundary has been changed or an annexation has occurred affecting a precinct boundary,the municipal clerk shall immediately Copyright ©2011 by the Office of the Revisor of Statutes,State of Minnesota.All Rights Reserved. 3 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2011 204B.14 notify the county auditor and secretary of state.The municipal clerk shall file a corrected base map with the secretary of state and county auditor within 30 days after the boundary change was made or,in the case of an annexation,the later of:(1)30 days after the approval of the annexation order;or (2)the effective date of the annexation order.Upon request,the county auditor shall provide a base map and precinct finder to the municipal clerk.The municipal clerk shall prepare a corrected precinct map and provide the corrected map to the county auditor,who shall correct the precinct finder in the statewide voter registration system and make the corrected map and precinct finder available for public inspection,and to the secretary of state,who shall update the precinct boundary database.The county auditor shall prepare and file precinct boundary maps for precincts in unorganized territories in the same manner as provided for precincts in municipalities.For every election held in the municipality the election judges shall be furnished precinct maps as provided in section 201.061,subdivision 6.If a municipality changes the boundary of an election precinct,or if an annexation affecting a precinct boundary occurs,the county auditor shall notify each school district with territory affected by the boundary change at least 30 days before the effective date of the change. Subd.6.Precinct boundaries to follow physical features.(a)Unless a precinct consists entirely of unorganized territory or more than one precinct is entirely included within one census block,for the first two years following a decennial census an election precinct boundary must follow a census block line. (b)The boundaries of election precincts must follow visible,clearly recognizable physical features.If it is not possible to establish the boundary between any two adjacent precincts along such features,the boundary around the two precincts combined shall be established in the manner provided in the rules of the secretary of state to comply with the provisions of this subdivision. The maps required by subdivision 5 shall clearly indicate which boundaries do not follow visible, clearly recognizable physical features. (c)For the purposes of this subdivision,"visible,clearly recognizable physical feature" means a street,road,boulevard,parkway,river,stream,shoreline,drainage ditch,railway right-of-way,or any other line which is clearly visible from the ground.A street or other roadway which has been platted but not graded is not a visible,clearly recognizable physical feature for the purposes of this subdivision. (d)If the secretary of state determines that a precinct boundary does not comply with this subdivision,the secretary of state shall send a notice to the county auditor or municipal clerk specifying the action needed to correct the precinct boundary.If,after 60 days,the county or municipal governing body has not taken action to correct the precinct boundary,the secretary of state shall correct the precinct boundary and notify the county auditor or municipal clerk of the action taken. (e)If a visible,clearly recognizable physical feature is not available for use as a precinct boundary,an alternate boundary used by the United States Bureau of the Census may be authorized by the secretary of state. Subd.7.Application to municipalities.Notwithstanding the provisions of section 410.21, or any other law,ordinance or charter to the contrary,the provisions of subdivisions 1,3 and 6 apply to all municipalities. Subd.8.[Repealed,1994 c 607 s 7] Copyright ©2011 by the Office of the Revisor of Statutes,State of Minnesota.All Rights Reserved. 4 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2011 204B.14 History:1981 c 29 art 4 s 14;1Sp1981 c 4 art 4 s 43;2Sp1981 c 2 s 2;1983 c 289 s 115 subd 1;1985 c 248 s 36;1986 c 444;1987 c 186 s 15;1987 c 212 s 1-4;1987 c 297 s 2;1990 c 453 s 4;1991 c 349 s 31-34;1993 c 208 s 1,2;1993 c 223 s 9;1994 c 607 s 1-4;1999 c 237 s 1; 2000 c 467 s 13-15;2005 c 156 art 6 s 34;2005 c 162 s 2;2006 c 270 art 1 s 1;2010 c 184 s 13,14;2010 c 201 s 24;2010 c 313 s 3,4;2011 c 18 s 2,3 Copyright ©2011 by the Office of the Revisor of Statutes,State of Minnesota.All Rights Reserved. CityCouncilAgenda:03/26/12 1 5E.ConsiderationofadoptingOrdinance#546amendingtheMonticelloZoning Ordinance,Section2.4(P)forSpecificReviewRequirementsandProceduresfor PlannedUnitDevelopmentandadoptingSummaryOrdinance#546Afor publication.Applicant:CityofMonticello (NAC) A.REFERENCE&BACKGROUND: PlanningCaseNumber:2012-004 Request(s):AmendmenttotheZoningOrdinancerelatingto variouspartsofthePUDordinance. InSeptemberof2011,theCityCouncilandPlanningCommissionheldajointworkshop toallowthePlanningCommissionandCityCounciltoreviewanddiscussthenewly formattedPlannedUnitDevelopmentordinance. Councilwillrecallthatatthebeginningofthezoningordinanceamendmentprocess,one oftheprimarygoalsoftheCitywastostrengthenthePlannedUnitDevelopment standards.Thisgoalwasidentifiedasameanstoachieveahigher-qualitydevelopment productthanwhathadbeenrealizedthroughpreviouslyapprovedPUDs.Infact,this goalistheprincipalpurposeandintentofthePUDitself-theCityoffersflexibilitytothe developerinexchangeforamorecreativedevelopmentthatbettermeetsthevaluesofthe community. ThePUDworkshopwasaimedataidingthePlanningCommissionandCouncilin understandinghowthenewcodeisdesignedtohelpachievethisgoal.Duringthe workshop,staffprovidedanoverviewoftheordinanceprocessandrequirements.Staff alsorequesteddirectiononanychangestotheordinancewhichthetwobodiesfelt necessary. TheattachedmaterialproposesaseriesofamendmentstothelanguageoftheCity’s PlannedUnitDevelopmentordinanceconsistentwithfeedbackprovidedattheworkshop andtherecommendationsofstaffuponfurtherreviewofthecode. Mostoftheproposedchangesareclericalorintendedtoclarifyexistinglanguage,and thegeneralformoftheordinanceisleftintact.Inthisregard,theordinancecontinuesto allowPlannedUnitDevelopmentbyzoningdistrictonly,andretainstheCollaborative process.Thecollaborativeprocesshasreceivedpositivecommentfromapplicants. Theattachedordinancecommentaryispresentedinstrikeout/underline formindicating proposedremovalsandadditions.Thetextisalsointerspersedwithstaffcommentsthat indicate,inmostplaces,therationalefortheproposedadditions.Thesecommentsarein bracketsanditalics,andarenotintendedtobeincludedinthefinalordinancelanguage. Inadditiontothecommentaryform,wehaveprepareda“clean”versionoftheordinance foreaseofreview. CityCouncilAgenda:03/26/12 2 PlanningCommissionRecommendation ApublichearingontheamendmentswasheldonFebruary21st,2012.Nopublic commentwasgivenduringthehearing.ThePlanningCommissionunanimously recommendstheordinanceamendmentsasproposed. A1.BudgetImpact:Therewillbeafeeforthesummarypublicationofthe ordinancedocument.Inaddition,consultingfeesareapplicablefortheordinance changesdeveloped,whicharecoveredwithinthePlanning&Zoningbudget. A2.StaffImpact:Stafftimeontheseamendmentshasincludedpreparationforthe initialworkshopandsubsequentreviewoftheproposedamendments. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoapproveOrdinance#546amendingtheMonticelloZoningOrdinance, Section2.4(P)forSpecificReviewRequirementsandProceduresforPlanned UnitDevelopmentandadoptingSummaryOrdinance#546Aforpublication, basedonfindingsmadebythePlanningCommissioninResolution2012-019. 2.MotiontodenyOrdinance#546amendingtheMonticelloZoningOrdinance, Section2.4(P)forSpecificReviewRequirementsandProceduresforPlanned UnitDevelopmentandtodenyadoptingSummaryOrdinance#546Afor publication,basedonfindingstobemadebytheCityCouncil. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: StaffrecommendsAlternative#1forapprovaloftheamendmentstothePUDordinance basedonthefindingscontainedwithinthePlanningCommissionresolution. ThePlannedUnitDevelopmentordinancedraftedwiththe2011ZoningOrdinance reflectsaprocesswhichallowsforanimprovedcommunicationprocesswiththe applicantandanordinancewhichsetsclearexpectationsforthePUDprocessand application.Theproposedamendmentsservetofurtherclarifystandardswithinthe ordinanceandsupporttheCity’sintenttoachieveahigher-qualitydevelopmentproduct throughPUD. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: A-Ordinance#546 B-SummaryOrdinance#546 C-PlanningCommissionResolution2012-019 D-PlanningCommissionMinutes,February21st,2012 E-ProposedPUDOrdinancewithCommentary F-ProposedPUDOrdinance-FinalDraft ORDINANCENO.546 CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA ANORDINANCEAMENDINGTITLE10OFTHEMONTICELLOZONINGCODE FORSECTION2.4(P)-PLANNEDUNITDEVELOPMENTS THECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFMONTICELLO,MINNESOTA,HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION1.Title10oftheMonticelloZoningCodeoftheCityofMonticello,Section2.4 –SpecificReviewProceduresandRequirementsisamendedasfollows: 2.4(P)PlannedUnitDevelopments (1)PurposeandIntent ThepurposeofthePlannedUnitDevelopment(PUD)zoningdistrictistoprovide greaterflexibilityinthedevelopmentofneighborhoodsandnon-residentialareasin ordertomaximizepublicvaluesandachievemorecreativedevelopmentoutcomes whileremainingeconomicallyviableandmarketable.Thisisachievedby undertakingacollaborativeprocessthatresultsinadevelopmentoutcomeexceeding thatwhichistypicallyachievablethroughtheconventionalzoningdistrict.Ifa developmentproposaldoesnotdemonstratesignificantpublicvaluebenefitsabove andbeyondthoseachievableunderaconventionalzoningdistrict,tTheCity reservestherighttodenythePUDrezoninganddirectthedevelopertore-apply underthestandardapplicablezoningdistrict. (2)InitiationofProceedings ApplicationsforaPUDshallbeinitiatedbyapplicationofthepropertyowneror otherpersonhavingauthoritytofileanapplicationpursuanttoSection2.3(B), AuthoritytoFileApplications. (3)ReflectionontheOfficialZoningMap (a)PUDprovisionsprovideanoptionalmethodofregulatinglanduse whichpermitsflexibilityinallowedusesandotherregulating provisions.Insomecircumstances,however,rulesandregulations governingthe underlying original zoningdistrict,orotherzoning regulationsfoundelsewhereintheCity’sordinances,may be appropriateto applywithinthePUD.Assuch,approval ofaPlanned UnitDevelopmentandexecutionofaPUDagreementshallrequirethe propertyinquestionberezonedtoPUD,butthedenotationonthe officialzoningmapshallalsoillustrate theunderlyingzoning district.ForeachPUDDistrict,aspecificordinanceshallbe adopted,alongwithatrackingdesignationforuseontheofficial ORDINANCENO.546 zoningmaptodistinguishitfromotherPUDdistrictsandidentify theadoptedordinanceintheCityCode.OnceaPUDhasbeen grantedandisineffectforaparcel,nobuildingpermitshallbeissued forthatparcelwhichisnotinconformancewiththeapprovedPUD Plan,thecurrentMinnesotaStateBuildingCodeandallassociated documents,andwithallotherapplicableCityCodeprovisions. (b)AllPUDrezoningsapprovedpriortotheeffectivedateofthis ordinanceshallretaintheirzoningclassificationsofR-PUD,andshall continuetobegovernedbytheordinanceandresolutionswhich createdtheseareas. (4)PermittedLocationsforPUDrezoning ArezoningtoPUDmayberequestedforanyresidential,commercial,or industrialzonedarea. (5)Minimum PUD sizeQualifications RezoningstoPUDwill not beconsidered only forareas lessthan8acres oflandin singleownershiporcontrol,exceptinthefollowingcircumstances: (a)Naturalfeaturesofthelandaresuchthatdevelopmentunder standardzoningregulationswouldnotbeappropriateinorderto conservesuchfeatures; (b)ThelandisintendedtobedevelopedinaccordancewithapriorPUD adjacenttooracrossthestreetfromthesubjectproperty;or (c)ThePUDprocessisdesirabletoensurecompatibilityandcareful considerationoftheeffectofadevelopmentonsurroundingland uses. Theproposalisin theCCDinwhichcasethereshallbenominimumlandarea requirement. (d)Multiplepartyownershipisadequatelysecuredthrougha corporation,partnership,orotherlegalentitythatwillensurethe abilitytofulfillalloftheobligationsofthePUDprocess,including approvals,development,andsecurities. (6)PermittedUsesWithinPUDs UseswithinaPUDshallbegovernedbytheordinanceestablishingthePUDandby theconditions,ifany,imposedbytheCityintheapprovalprocessandPUD documents.IfaspecificuseisnotestablishedoraddressedbyaPUDordinance, saiduseshallbegovernedbytheunderlyingzoningdistrictregulations. ORDINANCENO.546 (7)ExpectationsofaDevelopmentSeekingaRezoningtoPUD Theprovisionsofthissectionareintendedtoachievethefollowingpublicvalues withinaPUDzoningdistrictandassociatedsubdivision: (a)Ensurehighqualityconstructionstandardsandtheuseofhigh qualityconstructionmaterials; (b)Promoteavarietyofhousingstyleswhichincludefeaturessuchas sideorrearloadedgarages,frontporches,varyingroofpitches,and foursidedarchitecture/articulation; (c)Eliminaterepetitionofsimilarhousingtypesbyencouraginga housingmixture whichseparatesthe same/similarmodelofhomes byaminimumoftwolots thatdiversifiesthearchitectural qualitiesofaneighborhood; (d)Promoteaesthetically-pleasingdesign whichfostersasenseofplace withintheneighborhoodandappearsattractiveandinvitingfrom surroundingparcels; (e)Incorporateextensivelandscapinginexcessofwhatisrequiredby code; (f)Providehigh-qualitypark,openspace,andtrailopportunitiesthat meetor exceedtheexpectationsestablishedintheComprehensive Plan; (g)Provideaconvenientandefficientmulti-modaltransportationsystem toservicethedailyneedsofresidentsatpeakandnon-peakuse levels,withhighconnectivitytothelargercommunity. (h)Minimizetheextentofthe Promote development footprintand impervioussurfacestotheextentpossible thatisdesigned toreduce initialinfrastructurecostsandlong-termmaintenanceand operationalcosts; (i)Whereapplicable,Mmaximizetheuseofecologically-based approachestostormwatermanagement,restoreorenhanceon-site ecologicalsystems,andprotectoff-siteecologicalsystemsincluding theapplicationofLowImpactDevelopment(LID)practices; (j)Fosterininclusivecommunitybyprovidingacomplementarymixof lifecyclehousing; ORDINANCENO.546 (k)Preserveandprotectimportantecologicalareasidentifiedonthe City’snaturalresourceinventory(NRI); (8)AreasofFlexibility (a)TheCityshallconsideranincreaseinthe numberofoverallunitsdensityor intensityoftheproject,alongwith andassociated related reductionsinlotwidth andsizeifthePUDprovidessubstantiallymoresiteamenitiesandpublicvalues, asoutlinedinSection2.4(P)(7),thancouldbeachievedinaconventional residential developmentfortheapplicable zoningdistrictlandusezone. (b)TheCity shall may consideradecreaseintheamountofroadwidthrequiredor right-of-wayrequirementsifthePUDprovidessubstantiallymoresiteamenities, asoutlinedinSection2.4(P)(7)–andparticularlythoseamenitiesthatwould mitigatetrafficconcerns-,thanarefoundinaconventional residential developmentfortheapplicablezoningdistrict.Specificationsandstandardsfor streets,utilities,andotherpublicfacilitiesshallbeatthediscretionofCity Councilandmustprotectthehealth,safety,comfort,aesthetics,economic viability,andgeneralwelfareofthecity. (c)TheCityshallconsiderflexibilitywithregardtolotsize,width,anddepthwhen reviewingaPUDrezoningrequest.Specificationsandstandardsforlotsshallbe atthediscretionofCityCouncil,andshallencourageadesirableliving environmentwhichassistsinachievingthegoalssetoutforPUDs. (d)TheCityshallconsiderflexibilityinthephasingofaPUDdevelopment.Changes totheproposedstagingortimingofaPUDmaybeapprovedbytheCityCouncil whennecessaryorontheshowingofgoodcausebythedeveloper. (9)PUDProcedure AllrequestsforrezoningtoPlannedUnitDevelopmentshallfollowthestepsoutlined below. (a)Collaborativeprocessandprojectgoalsetting Thecollaborativeprocessandprojectgoalsettingstepisintendedtoallowthe applicanttomeetwithmembersoftheCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentand appointedandelectedofficialstogainanunderstandingofthepublicvalues relatedtodevelopmentofthesubjectsite.Thefeedbackreceivedduringthisstep willprovideguidancetotheapplicanton things elementsandobjectives to incorporateintoafutureconceptplan. ORDINANCENO.546 (i)InitiationofProceedings ArequestforaPUDConceptPlanReviewshallbeinitiatedbyapplicationof thepropertyownerorotherpersonhavingauthoritytofileanapplication pursuanttoSection2.3(B),AuthoritytoFileApplications. (ii)Application 1.AllapplicationsforaPUDCollaborativeprocessandprojectgoalsetting sessionshallbeinaccordancewithSection2.3,CommonReview Requirements. 2.Inadditiontocommonreviewrequirements,asiteanalysisshallbe submittedinanticipationofthepre-applicationactivitieswhichincludes thefollowinginformation: a.Locationofwoodedareasorsignificantfeatures(environmental, historical,cultural)oftheparcel; b.Indicatethebasefloodelevationlevel(ifapplicable)andshowthe generallocationoffloodwaysand/orfloodfringeareas; c.Delineationoftheordinaryhighwaterlevelsofallwaterbodies; d.Delineationoftheshorelanddistrictboundary(ifapplicable); e.Generallocationsofwetlands(ifapplicable); f.Calculationofgrossacresonthesiteproposedfordevelopment; f.g.Calculationofnetacresonthesiteproposedfordevelopment, includingacalculationof,anddeductionfromthegrossacreageof, allwetlands,floodplains,slopesofmorethan18%,significant woodlands,areasidentifiedintheCity’sNaturalResources Inventory,andanyotherunbuildableareasoftheprojectsite. g.h.Indicationofneighboringlandusessurroundingtheproposed developmentsite. (iii)CollaborativeProcessandProjectGoalSettingProcess 1.Theapplicantshallmeetwiththecitystaffforapre-application conferencepriortosubmittalofaconceptplan application tothecity. Theprimarypurposeoftheconferenceistoallowtheapplicantandstaff anopportunitytoreviewthecomprehensiveplanandtomakea preliminarydeterminationiftheproposalisconducivetoaPUDrezoning. 2.Citystaffandtheapplicantshallworktogethertoscheduleaconcurrent worksessionwithpolicymakersofthecity(applicablecommissionsand CityCouncil)todiscussthepublicvaluesonthesiteusingtheestablished publicvaluesinSection2.4(P)(7)asaguideline.Theresultofthis meetingwillbeapublicvaluesstatement. 3.Atanappropriatepointduringtheprocess,theapplicantshallholda neighborhoodmeeting.Thecityandallownersofpropertywithin1,000 ORDINANCENO.546 feetoftheproposedPUD(oralargerareaasdeterminedbythe CommunityDevelopment Department)shallbegivennoticeofthe meeting.Thepurposeofthemeetingistoinformtheneighborhoodofthe proposedPUD,discusstheconceptsandbasisfortheplanbeing developedandtoobtaininformationandsuggestionsfromthe neighborhood. 4.Theapplicantshallberesponsibleforthecostsincurredbythecityfor attorney,engineering,planning,orother consultant City-incurred fees costs duringthesepre-conceptplanactivities. (b)PUDConceptPlan Priortosubmittingformalpreliminaryplatandrezoningapplicationsforthe proposeddevelopment,theapplicantshallprepareaninformalconceptplanand presentittotheappropriatecommissionsandCityCouncilataconcurrent worksession,asscheduledbytheCommunityDevelopmentDepartment.The purposeofthismeetingistodetermineifallpartiesareonacommontrackandif thedevelopmentreflectsthestatedpublicvalues;.Theapplicantmayrequest thattheConceptandDevelopmentStagePUDapplicationsbeconsidered concurrently.Allowanceforconcurrentreviewshallbeatthesolediscretionof theCity,andtheapplicantassumesanyrisk,financialorotherwise,of proceedingwithplandevelopmentbeyondthestageatwhichtheCityhas identifiedPUDreviewisofficiallyunderconsideration.Withoutspecific writtenauthorizationfromtheCommunityDevelopment Department,no applicationforDevelopmentStagePUDshallbeconsideredcompletepriorto CityCouncilactionontheConceptStagePUD. (i)InitiationofProceedings ArequestforaPUDConceptPlanReviewshallbeinitiatedbyapplicationof thepropertyownerorotherpersonhavingauthoritytofileanapplication pursuanttoSection2.3(B),AuthoritytoFileApplications. (ii)Application 1.AllapplicationsforaPUDConceptPlanReviewshallbeinaccordance withSection2.3,CommonReviewRequirements. 2.Inadditiontocommonreviewrequirements,applicationsforaPUD ConceptPlanReviewshallalsoincludeatleasttheinformationinSection 2.4(P)(9)(b)(iii)belowtobeconsideredcomplete(exceptasexemptedby theCommunityDevelopmentDirector). (iii)SpecificPUDConceptPlanSubmittalRequirements Anapplicantshallprovidethefollowinginformationunlesswaivedbystaff: ORDINANCENO.546 1.Alistingofcontactinformationincludingname(s),address(es)andphone number(s)of:theownerofrecord,authorizedagentsorrepresentatives, engineer,surveyor,andanyotherrelevantassociates; 2.Alistingofthefollowingsitedata:Address,currentzoning,parcelsizein acresandsquarefeetandcurrentlegaldescription(s); 3.Anupdatedsiteanalysisincorporatinganyadditionalfeaturesorrequested changesidentifiedduringthecollaborativeprocessandprojectgoalsetting session; 4.Anarrativeexplaininghowtheidentifiedpublicvaluesforthesiteare addressedbytheconceptplan; 5.Alistingofgeneralinformationincludingthenumberofproposed lots residentialunits,commercialandindustriallandusesbycategoryof use,publicuseareasincludingadescriptionofproposeduse,andany otherlanduseproposedaspartofthePUDandacalculationofgross landarea; 6.Calculationoftheproposeddensityoftheprojectandthepotentialdensity understandardzoningregulations,includingbothgrossdensityandnet density,accountingfordevelopableandundevelopableland. Undevelopablelandshallincludeallwetlands,floodplains,sensitive ecologicalareasidentifiedintheNaturalResourceInventory,slopes greaterthan18%,poorsoils,andareasofconcentratedwoodlands. 7.Outlineadevelopmentscheduleindicatingtheapproximatedatewhen constructionoftheproject,orstagesofthesame,canbeexpectedtobegin andbecompleted(includingtheproposedphasingofconstructionof publicimprovementsandrecreationalandcommonspaceareas). 8.AConceptPUDPlanillustratingthenatureandtypeofproposed development.Ataminimum,theplanshouldshow: a.Areacalculationsforgrosslandarea b.Existingzoningdistrict(s) c.Layoutofproposedlotsandproposeduses.Denoteoutlotsplanned forpublicdedicationand/oropenspace(schools,parks,etc.) d.Areacalculationsforeachparcel e.Generallocationofwetlandsand/orwatercoursesovertheproperty andwithin200feetoftheperimeterofthesubdivisionparcel f.Locationofexistingandproposedstreetswithinandimmediately adjacenttothesubdivisionparcel g.Proposedsidewalksandtrails h.Proposedparkingareas i.Proposedparks,commonareas,andpreservationeasements(indicate publicvs.privateifapplicable) ORDINANCENO.546 j.Generallocationofwoodedareasorsignificantfeatures (environmental,historical,cultural)oftheparcel k.Locationofutilitysystemsthatwillservetheproperty l.Other:Anapplicantmaysubmitanyadditionalinformationthatmay explaintheproposedPUD. (iv)PUDConceptPlanReview 1.UponreceivingacompletePUDconceptplanapplication,theCommunity DevelopmentDepartment,alongwithotherdesignatedstaff,shallreview theproposalandgenerateastaffreportanalyzingtheproposalagainstthe expectationsforPUDs.Thereportshallbeforwardedtotheappropriate commissions—asdeterminedbytheCommunityDevelopment Department Director—andtheCityCouncilforreview. 2.CommissionsreceivingthereportshallreviewthePUDrezoningrequest, andmakearecommendationtotheCityCouncilwithregardtotheplat layout,design,density,uses,deviations,andachievedpublicvaluesofthe conceptplan;ThePlanningCommissionshallberesponsibleforthe formalcommentstotheCityCouncil.Otherstaffandcommission reportsshallbeprovidedtothePlanningCommissionandmadeapart ofthePlanningCommission’sreport. 3.TheCouncilshallconsidertherecommendationsofthecommissionsthat haveconductedareview,andprovidefeedbacktotheapplicantonthe proposedpublicvalues,proposeddeviations,andanyotheraspectofthe application.TheCouncilshalleithermakeamotionthattheapplicant—if theychoosetoproceed—moveforwardwiththePUDpreliminaryplatand rezoningrequests,ordirecttheapplicanttosubmitadevelopment applicationusingconventionalzoningdistrictstandards.TheCouncil shallmakeitsfindingwithinthetimeallottedbyMinn.Stat.Section 15.99,andmaytakeuptheapplicationwithoutPlanningCommission actionifthePlanningCommissionhasnotactedwithinsixty(60)days ofitsoriginalpublichearingdate.TheCityCouncil’sfindingsare explicitlynotanapprovaloftheproject,andareintendedtorepresent thecomplianceoftheproposedprojectwiththePublicValues Statement,theapplicablezoningregulations,andtheComprehensive Plan. 4.AftertheCitypolicymakershavereviewedandcommentedonthe ConceptPUDplan,citystaffshallmeetwith any other responsible agencies,asapplicable,toexploreopportunitiesofpartnershiptoenhance thestatedpublicvalues. ORDINANCENO.546 (c)PUDPreliminaryPlatandRezoning –DevelopmentStagePUD (i)InitiationofProceedings 1.ConcurrentapplicationsforrezoningtoPUDandaPreliminaryPlatshall besubmittedtotheCitywithinoneyearoftheCityCouncil’s recommendation findings onthePUDConceptPlan.Failuretosubmit applicationsforrezoningtoPUDandaPreliminaryPlatwithin the one year timeframe oftheCityCouncil’sfindings willrequiretheapplicantto begintheprocess withtheCollaborativePUDmeeting.anewfromthat pointforward. 2.TherequestsforrezoningtoPUDandPreliminaryPlatshallbeinitiated byapplicationofthepropertyownerorotherpersonhavingauthorityto fileanapplicationpursuanttoSection2.3(B),AuthoritytoFile Applications.TheDevelopmentStagePUDrequestconstitutesa separateapplicationandshallbesubjecttonewtimelinesforthe purposesofMinn.Stat.Section15.99. (ii)Application 1.AllapplicationsforrezoningtoPUDandPreliminaryPlatshallbein accordancewithSection2.3,CommonReviewRequirements. 2.TheapplicationforrezoningtoPUDshallbeinaccordancewithSection 2.4(B),ZoningOrdinanceTextandZoningMapAmendments. 3.TheapplicationforPreliminaryPlatshallbeinaccordancewithCityCode Title11,Chapter4,DataRequiredforPreliminaryandFinalPlats;and shallincludetheadditionalinformationrequirementslistedinSection 2.4(P)(9)(c)(iii)belowtobeconsideredcomplete(exceptasexemptedby theCommunityDevelopmentDepartment). 4.IfthePUDisproposedtodevelopoveratimeframeexceedingtwoyears, aPUD Master Phasing Plan fortheentireproject(tobecompletedin phases)maybesubmitted.SubsequentPUDFinalPlanapplications wouldonlygrantapprovalforanindividualphase. (iii)SpecificPUDPreliminaryPlatandRezoning–DevelopmentStage SubmittalRequirements AnapplicantshallprovideaseparatePUDDevelopmentPlanclearly delineatingtheproposeddevelopmentandallfeaturesnotconsistentwith underlyingzoningregulations(e.g.setbackdeviations).Ataminimum,the planshouldshow: 1.Administrativeinformation(includingidentificationofthedrawingasa “PreliminaryPUDDevelopmentPlan,”theproposednameofthe subdivision,contactinformationforthedeveloperandindividual preparingtheplan,signatureofthesurveyorcertifyingthedocument,date ofplanpreparationorrevision,andagraphicscaleandtruenortharrow); ORDINANCENO.546 2.Areacalculationsforgrosslandarea,wetlandareas,wetlandbuffers, right-of-waydedications,conservationareas,andproposedpublicand privateparks; 3.Existingzoningdistrict(s); 4.Layoutofproposedlotswithfuturelotandblocknumbers.Theperimeter boundarylineofthesubdivisionshouldbedistinguishablefromtheother propertylines.Denoteoutlotsplannedforpublicdedicationand/oropen space(schools,parks,etc.); 5.Areacalculationsforeachparcel; 6.Proposedsetbacksoneachlot(formingthebuildingpad)andcalculated buildablearea; 7.Proposedgrosshardcoverallowanceperlot(ifapplicable); 8.Existingcontoursatintervalsoftwofeet.Contoursmustextenda minimumof200feetbeyondtheboundaryoftheparcel(s)inquestion; 9.Delineationofwetlandsand/orwatercoursesoverthepropertyandwithin 200feetoftheperimeterofthesubdivisionparcel; 10.Delineationoftheordinaryhighwaterlevelsofallwaterbodies; 11.Grading,drainageanderosioncontrolplanpreparedbyaregistered professionalengineer,providingallinformationoutlinedinMonticello ZoningCode,Chapter4,Section10(C). 12.Location,width,andnamesofexistingandproposedstreetswithinand immediatelyadjacenttothesubdivisionparcel; 13.Easementsandrights-of-waywithinoradjacenttothesubdivision parcel(s); 14.Thelocationandorientationofproposedbuildings; 15.Coloredbuildingelevationswhichdetailthematerialsbeingused. 16.Proposedsidewalksandtrails; 17.Proposedparkingareas; 17.Vehicularcirculationsystemshowinglocationanddimensionforall driveways,parkingspaces,parkinglotaisles,serviceroads,loading areas,firelanes,emergencyaccess,ifnecessary,publicandprivate streets,alleys,sidewalks,bikepaths,directionoftrafficflowandtraffic controldevices. 18.Lightinglocation,styleandmountingandlightdistributionplan. 19.Proposedparks,commonareas,andpreservationeasements(indicate publicvs.privateifapplicable); 20.Landscapeplanpreparedbyaqualifiedprofessionalprovidingall informationoutlinedinMonticelloZoningOrdinanceSection4.1(D). includingplantingcounts,sizesandspecies. ORDINANCENO.546 21.Locationanddetailofsignageprovidingallpertinentinformation outlinedinMonticelloZoningOrdinanceSection2.4(K)(3)(b). 22.Location,accessandscreeningdetailoflargetrashhandlingand recyclingcollectionareasincompliancewiththerequirementsof MonticelloZoningOrdinanceSection5.3(D)(31). 17.23.AnyotherinformationasdirectedbytheCommunityDevelopment Department. (iv)PUDPreliminaryPlatandRezoningtoPUDReview 1.TheapplicationforrezoningtoPUDshallbereviewedinaccordancewith Section2.4(B),ZoningOrdinanceTextandZoningMapAmendments. 2.TheapplicationforPreliminaryPlatshallbereviewedinaccordancewith CityCodeTitle11,Chapter3,Section2,PreliminaryPlatProcedure. 3.Aspartofthereviewprocessforbothapplications,theCommunity DevelopmentDepartmentshallgenerateananalysisoftheproposal againsttheexpectationsforPUDsandthepreviouslyestablishedpublic valuesstatementtoformulatearecommendationregardingtherezoningto theplanningcommissionandCityCouncil. 4.Theplanningcommissionshallholdapublichearingandconsiderthe application’sconsistencywiththeintentandpurposeofthePUDand comprehensiveplangoals.Theplanningcommissionshallmake recommendationstotheCityCouncilonthemerit,neededchanges,and suggestedconditionsoftheproposedrezoning,preliminaryplatandPUD developmentplan. 5.Inapprovingordenyingtheordinancetorezonethesubjectpropertyto PUD,theCityCouncilshallmakefindingsonthefollowing: a.ThePUDplanisconsistentwiththecity’scomprehensiveplan; b.ThePUDplanistailoredtothespecificcharacteristicsofthesiteand achievesahigherqualityofsiteplanningandgreaterpublicbenefits thanwouldbeachievedunderconventionalprovisionsofthe ordinance; c.ThePUDplanaddressesthepurposeandintentofthePUDrezoning laidoutinSection2.4(P)(1),andthepublicvaluesstatement establishedatthebeginningoftheprocess d.ThePUDplanaddressestheexpectationsofaPUDlaidoutinSection 2.4(P)(7); e.ThePUDplanmaintainsorimprovestheefficiencyofpublicstreets, utilities,andotherpublicservices; f.ThePUDplanresultsindevelopmentcompatiblewithexisting adjacentandfutureguidedlanduses; ORDINANCENO.546 g.HowthePUDplanaddressesthepurposeandintentofthePUD rezoninglaidoutinSection2.4(P)(1),andthepublicvaluesstatement establishedatthebeginningoftheprocess. h.WhetherthePUDcanbeaccommodatedbyexistingpublicservices, suchasparks,police,fire,administration,andutilities,orthe developerhasprovidedforthegrowthandextensionofsuchservices asacomponentofthePUD. i.WhetherthePUDisdesignedtotakeadvantageof,andpreserve,the naturalfeaturesofthesubjectproperty,includingwaterways, forestedareas,naturalprairie,topography,views,etc. 6.Anordinancerezoningthepropertyshallbeadoptedthatincludesan effectivedatethatcoincideswiththeapprovalandrecordingoftheFinal Platfortheproperty. (d)PUDFinalPlat (i)InitiationofProceedings 1.AfinalplatthatconformswiththepreliminaryplatandassociatedPUD rezoningordinanceshallbesubmittedwithin180daysofapprovalofthe ordinanceand preliminaryplatapproval,unlessotherwiseextendedbythe CityCouncil.Iftheapplicantfailstosubmitafinalplatapplicationor extensionrequestwithinthistimeperiod,the zoning shallrevertbackto theunderlyingzoningdistrictthrougharezoningordinanceadoptedby theCityCouncilPUDapplicationshallbeconsideredvoidandthe applicantshallberequiredtobegintheprocesswiththeCollaborative PUDmeeting. 2.TherequestforPUDFinalPlatshallbeinitiatedbyapplicationofthe propertyownerorotherpersonhavingauthoritytofileanapplication pursuanttoSection2.3(B),AuthoritytoFileApplications. (ii)Application 1.AllapplicationsforPUDFinalPlatshallbeinaccordancewithSection 2.3,CommonReviewRequirements. 2.TheapplicationforPUDFinalPlatshallbeinaccordancewithCityCode Title11,Chapter4,DataRequiredforPreliminaryandFinalPlats. 3.Inadditiontogeneralcitycoderequirements,applicationsforaPUDFinal PlatshallalsoincludeatleasttheinformationinSection2.4(P)(9)(d)(iii) belowtobeconsideredcomplete(exceptasexemptedbytheCommunity DevelopmentDepartment). (iii)SpecificPUDFinalPlatSubmittalRequirements 1.IfaPUDMasterPlanfortheentireprojectwassubmittedandapprovedas partofthepreliminaryplatreview,anupdatedMasterPlanshallbe ORDINANCENO.546 submittedincorporatingallchangesrequiredbythepreliminaryplat approval. 2.ThePUDDevelopmentPlanshallbeupdatedtoincorporateallchanges requiredbythepreliminaryplatandrezoningapprovals.Thisdocument mustclearlyshowalldeviationsfromstandardzoningbeingapprovedas partofthePUD. 3.TheCity andapplicant shallprepare,andtheCityandapplicantshall execute,adeveloper’sagreementwhichreferencesallPUDplans, specifiespermitteduses,allowabledensities,developmentphasing, requiredimprovements,completiondatesforimprovements,therequired letterofcredit,allrequireddevelopmentfees,escrows,andwarranties, andanyotherinformationdeemednecessarybytheCity. 3.4.TheCityshall,uponrecordingoftheFinalPlat,publishthePUD Ordinancespecifyinglanduses,densities,performancestandards,and ongoinggeneralobligationsofoccupantsofthePUD.Suchordinance shallcreateazoningdistrictthatisspecifictothepropertyforwhichthe PUDwasapplied,andshallbedesignatedinsuchawayastobeableto marktheofficialzoningmaptoidentifythePUDordinance.ThePUD ordinanceshallalsodesignatethatsuchpropertyistherebyrezonedto thePUDdistrictasadopted. 4.5.Up-to-datetitleevidenceforthesubjectpropertyinaformacceptableto theCityshallbeprovidedaspartoftheapplicationforthePUDFinalPlat. 5.6.DevelopershallprovidewarrantydeedsforPropertybeingdedicatedto theCityforallparks,outlots,etc.,freefromallliensandencumbrances exceptasotherwisewaivedbytheCity Council. 6.7.Developershallprovidealleasementdedicationdocumentsforeasements notshownonthefinalplatincludingthosefortrails,ingress/egress,etc., togetherwithallnecessaryconsentstotheeasementbyexisting encumbrancersoftheproperty. (iv)PUDFinalPlatReview TheapplicationforPUDFinalPlatshallbereviewedinaccordancewithCity CodeTitle11,Chapter3,Section3,FinalPlatProcedure. (10)PUDAmendments ApprovedPUD’smaybeamendedfromtimetotimeasaresultofunforeseen circumstances,overlookedopportunities,orrequestsfromadeveloper.Atsucha time,theapplicantshallmakeanapplicationtothecityforaPUDamendment.All suchamendmentswillbeprocessedasoneofthefollowing: (a)AdministrativeAmendment –TheCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentmay approveminorchangesinthelocation,placement,andheightofbuildingsifsuch ORDINANCENO.546 changesarerequiredbyengineeringorothercircumstances,notforeseenatthe timethePUDFinalPlanwasapproved,providedthechanges areindeedminor providedthechanges conformtothereviewcriteriaappliedbythePlanning CommissionandCityCouncil,andareconsistentwithallrequirementsofthe PUDordinance.Undernocircumstancesshallanadministrativeamendment allowadditionalstoriestobuildings,additionallots,orchangestodesignateduses establishedaspartofthePUD. (b)PUDAdjustment –anadjustmenttoaPUDmaybemadethroughreviewand approvalbyasimplemajorityvoteoftheCityCouncilwithorwithoutreferralto thePlanningCommission.Toqualifyforthisreview,theminoradjustmentshall not: (i)Eliminate,diminishorbedisruptivetothepreservationandprotectionof sensitivesitefeatures. (ii)Eliminate,diminishorcompromisethehighqualityofsiteplanning,design, landscapingorbuildingmaterials. (iii)Altersignificantlythelocationofbuildings,parkingareasorroads. (iv)Increaseordecreasethenumberofresidentialdwellingunitsbymorethan fivepercent. (v)Increasethegrossfloorareaofnon-residentialbuildingsbymorethanthree percentorincreasethegrossfloorareaofanyindividualbuildingbymore thanfivepercent(residentiallotsnotguidedforspecificstructuresizesare excludedfromthisrequirement). (vi)Increasethenumberofstoriesofanybuilding. (vii)Decreasetheamountofopenspaceoralteritinsuchawayastochangeits originaldesignorintendedfunctionoruse. (viii)Createnon-compliancewithany special conditionattachedtotheapprovalof theFinalPUDPlan. (c)PUDAmendment –anychangenotqualifyingforanadministrativeamendment oraPUDadjustmentshallrequireaPUDamendment.Anapplicationtoamenda PUDshallbeadministeredinthesamemannerasthatrequiredforaninitialPUD beginningatPUDPreliminaryPlat. (11)PUDCancellation APUDshallonlybecancelledandrevokedupontheCityCounciladoptingan ordinancerescindingtheordinanceapprovingthePUD.Inanyevent,itshallnotbe necessaryforthecounciltofindthecreationofaPUDdistrictwasinerror.The ordinancerevokingthePUDshallincludeasectionrezoningthepropertyto agriculturaluse,ortheCityCouncilmaydeterminethatamoreappropriatebase ORDINANCENO.546 zoningdistrictshouldbechosentofurthertheintentandobjectivesofthe ComprehensivePlan. (12)Administration Ingeneral,thefollowingrulesshallapplytoallPUDs: (a)Rulesandregulations:NorequirementoutlinedinthePUDprocessshallrestrict theCityCouncilfromtakingactiononanapplicationifnecessarytomeetstate mandatedtimedeadlines; (b)PlanCertification:TheCitymayrequirethatPUDplansbe certified atthe timeofsubmittaland/oruponcompletionofconstruction. (c)(b)Preconstruction:Nobuildingpermitshallbegrantedforanybuildingon landforwhichaPUDplanisintheprocessofreview,unlesstheproposed buildingisallowedundertheexistingzoningandwillnotimpact,influence,or interferewiththeproposedPUDplan. (d)(c)EffectonConveyedProperty.Intheeventanyrealpropertyinthe approvedPUDAgreementisconveyedintotal,orinpart,thebuyersthereofshall beboundbytheprovisionsoftheapprovedFinalPUDPlan constitutingapart thereof aswellasthePUDzoningordinance;provided,however,thatnothing hereinshallbeconstruedtocreatenon-conforminglots,buildingsites,buildings orusesbyvirtueofanysuchconveyanceofalot,buildingsite,buildingorpartof thedevelopmentcreatedpursuanttoandinconformancewiththeapprovedPUD. SECTION2.ThisOrdinanceshalltakeeffectandbeinfullforcefromandafterits passageandpublication.Theordinanceinitsentiretyshallbepostedon theCitywebsiteafterpublication.CopiesofthecompleteOrdinanceare availableonlineandatMonticelloCityHallforexaminationuponrequest. ORDINANCENO.546 ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis26thdayofMarch,2012. CITYOFMONTICELLO ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator VOTINGINFAVOR: VOTINGINOPPOSITION: SUMMARYORDINANCENO.546A CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA ASUMMARYORDINANCEAMENDINGTITLE10,SECTION2.4(P)OFTHE MONTICELLOZONINGCODERELATINGTOPLANNEDUNITDEVELOPMENTS NOTICEISHEREBYGIVEN that,onMarch26,2012,OrdinanceNo.546wasadopted bytheCityCounciloftheCityofMonticello,Minnesota.Duetothelengthynatureof OrdinanceNo.546,thefollowingSummaryOrdinanceNo.546Ahasbeenpreparedfor publicationasauthorizedbystatelaw. TheordinanceadoptedbytheCouncilamendsTitle10,Section2.4(P)oftheMonticello ZoningCode.ThegeneralpurposeoftheordinanceamendmentistoupdateSpecificReview ProceduresandRequirementsrelatedtoPlannedUnitDevelopments(PUD)withchangesinthe followingsections: 2.4(P)(1):PurposeandIntent 2.4(P)(3):ReflectionontheOfficialZoningMap 2.4(P)(5):PUDQualifications 2.4(P)(6):PermittedUsesWithinPUDs 2.4(P)(7):ExpectationsofaDevelopmentSeekingaRezoningtoPUD 2.4(P)(8):AreasofFlexibility 2.4(P)(9):PUDProcedure 2.4(P)(10):PUDAmendments 2.4(P)(11):PUDCancellation 2.4(P)(12):PUDAdministration Aprintedcopyofthewholeordinanceisavailableforinspectionbyanypersonduring theCity’sregularofficehours.ThecompleteordinancewillbepostedontheCity’swebsite followingpublication. APPROVEDFORPUBLICATION bytheCityCounciloftheCityofMonticello, Minnesota,this26th dayofMarch,2012. CITYOFMONTICELLO ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: JeffO’NeillCityAdministrator VOTINGINFAVOR: VOTINGINOPPOSITION: CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTIONNO.2012–019 Date:February21,2012ResolutionNo.2012-019 MotionBy:SecondedBy: ARESOLUTIONRECOMMENDINGAPPROVALOFANAMENDMENTTO THEMONTICELLOZONINGORDINANCERELATINGTOZONINGREGULATIONS FORPLANNEDUNITDEVELOPMENTZONINGDISTRICTSIN TITLE10,CHAPTER2,SECTION2.4(P) WHEREAS,theCityofMonticellohasadoptedazoningordinanceincludingregulationsfortheuse ofPlannedUnitDevelopmentasazoningprocess;and WHEREAS,theCityofMonticellohasfoundthatcertainamendmentstosaidregulationswill benefittheintentoftheregulationsandtheprocessforapplicationundersuchregulations;and WHEREAS,thePlanningCommissionhasconductedapublichearingonFebruary21,2012to receivepubliccommentontheproposedamendmentstotheZoningOrdinance;and WHEREAS,thePlanningCommissionhasconsideredallofthecommentsandthestaffreport, whichareincorporatedbyreferenceintotheresolution;and WHEREAS,thePlanningCommissionoftheCityofMonticellomakesthefollowingFindings ofFactinrelationtotherecommendationofapproval: 1.TheamendmentsareconsistentwiththeintentoftheComprehensivePlan. 2.TheamendmentswillfacilitatetheCity’sgoalsforlanddevelopment. 3.Theamendmentswilldirectapplicantsinpreparingapplicationsandproceedingthrough thePlannedUnitDevelopmentreviewprocess. NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVED,bythePlanningCommissionoftheCityof Monticello,Minnesota: ThePlanningCommissionrecommendsthattheCityCounciladopttheamendmentstothePlanned UnitDevelopmentregulationsoftheMonticelloZoningOrdinanceaspresented. ADOPTED this21st dayofFebruary,bythePlanningCommissionoftheCityof Monticello,Minnesota. MONTICELLOPLANNINGCOMMISSION By:_______________________________ RodDragsten,Chair ATTEST: ___________________________________ JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator (A)PlannedUnitDevelopments (1)PurposeandIntent ThepurposeofthePlannedUnitDevelopment(PUD)zoningdistrictistoprovidegreater flexibilityinthedevelopmentofneighborhoodsandnon maximizepublicvaluesandachievemorecreativedevelopmentoutcomeswhile remainingeconomicallyviableandmarketable.Thisisachievedbyundertakinga collaborativeprocessthatresultsinadevelopmentoutcomeexceedingthatwhichis typicallyachievablethroughtheconventionalzoningdistrict doesnotdemonstratesignificantpublicvaluebenefitsaboveandbeyondthoseachievable underaconventionalzoningdistrict, anddirectthedevelopertore comment:Originallanguageistooconditional aPUDoutright.TheconditionalnatureimpliessomerightstoPUD.] (2)InitiationofProceedings ApplicationsforaPUDshallbeinitiatedbyapplicationofthepropertyownerorotherperson havingauthoritytofileanapplicationpursuanttoSection Applications. (3)ReflectionontheOfficialZoningMap (a)PUDprovisionsprovideanoptionalmethodofregulatinglandusewhich permitsflexibilityinallowedusesandotherregulatingprovisions. circumstances,however,rulesandregulationsgoverningthe district,orotherzoningregulationsfoundelsewhereintheCity’sordinances, appropriateto applywithinthePUD.Assuch, andexecutionofaPUDagreementshallrequirethepropertyinquestionberezonedto PUD,butthedenotationontheofficialzoningmapshallalsoillustratetheunderlying zoningdistrict.ForeachPUDDistrict,aspecificordinanceshallbeadopted,alon atrackingdesignationforuseontheofficialzoningmaptodistinguishitfromotherPUD districtsandidentifytheadoptedordinanceintheCity grantedandisineffectforaparcel,nobuildingpermitshallbeissued whichisnotinconformancewiththeapprovedPUDPlan,thecurrentMinnesotaState BuildingCodeandallassociateddocuments,andwithallotherapplicableCityCode provisions.[Staffcomment:T overlaydistrict,althoughothertextreferstoPUDasabasedistrict.Itcouldbe tobeeither–butthedistricttextneedstobe codeistousePUDasabasedistrict, essentiallythecreationofanentirelynewzoningdistrict districtcanreferenceotherdistrictdetailsratherthanreprinteverythingnew,butitis stillabasedistrict,withoutan zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz PUDFinalPlat PUD Preliminary Plat &Rezoning REVIEW (Staff,applicable Commissions & Council) PUD Preliminary Plat and Rezoning APPLICATION PUD Concept Plan REVIEW (Staff,applicable Commissions & Council) PUD Concept Plan APPLICATION Collaborative Review (Staff,applicable Commissions & Council) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Collaborative Process PlannedUnitDevelopments PurposeandIntent urposeofthePlannedUnitDevelopment(PUD)zoningdistrictistoprovidegreater flexibilityinthedevelopmentofneighborhoodsandnon-residentialareasinorderto maximizepublicvaluesandachievemorecreativedevelopmentoutcomeswhile conomicallyviableandmarketable.Thisisachievedbyundertakinga collaborativeprocessthatresultsinadevelopmentoutcomeexceedingthatwhichis typicallyachievablethroughtheconventionalzoningdistrict.Ifadevelopmentproposal onstratesignificantpublicvaluebenefitsaboveandbeyondthoseachievable underaconventionalzoningdistrict,tTheCityreservestherighttodenythePUDrezoning anddirectthedevelopertore-applyunderthestandardapplicablezoningdistrict comment:Originallanguageistooconditional –theCityshouldreservetherighttodeny aPUDoutright.TheconditionalnatureimpliessomerightstoPUD.] InitiationofProceedings ApplicationsforaPUDshallbeinitiatedbyapplicationofthepropertyownerorotherperson havingauthoritytofileanapplicationpursuanttoSection 2.3(B),AuthoritytoFile ReflectionontheOfficialZoningMap PUDprovisionsprovideanoptionalmethodofregulatinglandusewhich permitsflexibilityinallowedusesandotherregulatingprovisions.Insome stances,however,rulesandregulationsgoverningthe underlying ,orotherzoningregulationsfoundelsewhereintheCity’sordinances, applywithinthePUD.Assuch,approval ofaPlannedUnitDevelopment dexecutionofaPUDagreementshallrequirethepropertyinquestionberezonedto ,butthedenotationontheofficialzoningmapshallalsoillustratetheunderlying ForeachPUDDistrict,aspecificordinanceshallbeadopted,alon atrackingdesignationforuseontheofficialzoningmaptodistinguishitfromotherPUD districtsandidentifytheadoptedordinanceintheCity Code.OnceaPUDhasbeen grantedandisineffectforaparcel,nobuildingpermitshallbeissued forthatparcel whichisnotinconformancewiththeapprovedPUDPlan,thecurrentMinnesotaState BuildingCodeandallassociateddocuments,andwithallotherapplicableCityCode [Staffcomment:Thisoriginalclauseistalkingaboutusing PUDasan overlaydistrict,althoughothertextreferstoPUDasabasedistrict.Itcouldbe butthedistricttextneedstobe setuptoreflectthat.Sincetheintentofthe codeistousePUDasabasedistrict,thislanguageisconfusing.APUDbasedistrictis essentiallythecreationofanentirelynewzoningdistrict –uses,standards,etc.Thisnew districtcanreferenceotherdistrictdetailsratherthanreprinteverythingnew,butitis stillabasedistrict,withoutanymappingreferencetoan“underlying”zoningdistrict. urposeofthePlannedUnitDevelopment(PUD)zoningdistrictistoprovidegreater residentialareasinorderto maximizepublicvaluesandachievemorecreativedevelopmentoutcomeswhile conomicallyviableandmarketable.Thisisachievedbyundertakinga collaborativeprocessthatresultsinadevelopmentoutcomeexceedingthatwhichis Ifadevelopmentproposal onstratesignificantpublicvaluebenefitsaboveandbeyondthoseachievable heCityreservestherighttodenythePUDrezoning applyunderthestandardapplicablezoningdistrict.[Staff theCityshouldreservetherighttodeny ApplicationsforaPUDshallbeinitiatedbyapplicationofthepropertyownerorotherperson 2.3(B),AuthoritytoFile PUDprovisionsprovideanoptionalmethodofregulatinglandusewhich Insome underlying original zoning ,orotherzoningregulationsfoundelsewhereintheCity’sordinances,may be ofaPlannedUnitDevelopment dexecutionofaPUDagreementshallrequirethepropertyinquestionberezonedto ,butthedenotationontheofficialzoningmapshallalsoillustratetheunderlying ForeachPUDDistrict,aspecificordinanceshallbeadopted,alongwith atrackingdesignationforuseontheofficialzoningmaptodistinguishitfromotherPUD OnceaPUDhasbeen forthatparcel whichisnotinconformancewiththeapprovedPUDPlan,thecurrentMinnesotaState BuildingCodeandallassociateddocuments,andwithallotherapplicableCityCode PUDasan overlaydistrict,althoughothertextreferstoPUDasabasedistrict.Itcouldbe designed setuptoreflectthat.Sincetheintentofthe sconfusing.APUDbasedistrictis uses,standards,etc.Thisnew districtcanreferenceotherdistrictdetailsratherthanreprinteverythingnew,butitis ymappingreferencetoan“underlying”zoningdistrict. Instead,themapreferenceshouldpointtotheadoptedPUDOrdinance,suchasalable like“PUD-A”,“PUD-B”,etc.,orreferencingthedateofadoption,suchasPUD-3-1- 12.] (b)AllPUDrezoningsapprovedpriortotheeffectivedateofthisordinance shallretaintheirzoningclassificationsofR-PUD,andshallcontinuetobe governedbytheordinanceandresolutionswhichcreatedtheseareas. (4)PermittedLocationsforPUDrezoning ArezoningtoPUDmayberequestedforanyresidential,commercial,orindustrialzoned area. (5)Minimum PUD sizeQualifications RezoningstoPUDwill not beconsidered only forareas lessthan8acres oflandinsingle ownershiporcontrol,exceptinthefollowingcircumstances:[Staffcomment:Arbitrary acreagethresholdscanraiseproblems,particularlyinredevelopmentareas.Aprojecteither meetstheCity’sgoalsforusingaPUDprocessoritdoesn’t.Theseacreagethresholdscame intofashionwhenCitiesbegantoworrythatsmallerprojectswerejustusingPUDtoget aroundordinancerequirements–whichwasnodoubthappening–buttheproblemwasthe City’swillingnesstocompromiseitsprinciples,notwiththesizeoftheproject.Manysmaller PUDsaregood,andmanylargerPUDsarebad–irrespectiveofacreage.] (a)Naturalfeaturesofthelandaresuchthatdevelopmentunderstandardzoningregulations wouldnotbeappropriateinordertoconservesuchfeatures; (b)ThelandisintendedtobedevelopedinaccordancewithapriorPUDadjacenttoor acrossthestreetfromthesubjectproperty;or (c)ThePUDprocessisdesirabletoensurecompatibilityandcarefulconsiderationofthe effectofadevelopmentonsurroundinglanduses. (d)TheproposalisintheCCDinwhichcasethereshallbenominimumlandarea requirement. (d)Multiplepartyownershipisadequatelysecuredthroughacorporation,partnership,or otherlegalentitythatwillensuretheabilitytofulfillalloftheobligationsofthePUD process,includingapprovals,development,andsecurities. (6)PermittedUsesWithinPUDs UseswithinaPUDshallbegovernedbytheordinanceestablishingthePUDandbythe conditions,ifany,imposedbytheCityintheapprovalprocessandPUDdocuments .Ifa specificuseisnotestablishedoraddressedbyaPUDordinance,saiduseshallbegoverned bythe underlyingzoningdistrict regulations.[Staffcomment:Sameissuewithbasev. overlayconcept.] zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Formatted:Font:NotBold,NotHighlight Formatted:Font:NotBold,NotHighlight Formatted:Indent:Left:0.75",Nobulletsor numbering Formatted:ListParagraph Formatted:Font:11pt Formatted:Font:Bold Formatted:Tabstops:Notat1" Formatted:Font:NotBold (7)ExpectationsofaDevelopmentSeekingaRezoningtoPUD Theprovisionsofthissectionareintendedtoachievethefollowingpublicvalueswithina PUDzoningdistrictandassociatedsubdivision: (a)Ensurehighqualityconstructionstandardsandtheuseofhighqualityconstruction materials; (b)Promoteavarietyofhousingstyleswhichincludefeaturessuchassideorrearloaded garages,frontporches,varyingroofpitches,andfoursidedarchitecture/articulation; (c)Eliminaterepetitionofsimilarhousingtypesbyencouragingahousingmixture which separatesthesame/similarmodelofhomesbyaminimumoftwolots thatdiversifiesthe architecturalqualitiesofaneighborhood;[Staffcomment:Applyingthisasastandard hasalwaysbeenproblematic–whataboutcorners,oracrossthestreet.And,whatis “sameorsimilar”?Differentcolor?Differentsiding?Anadditionaldormer?This requirementsisdifficulttointerpretandenforcebytheCity,andismoreofadeveloper’s marketingtoolthanagoodmeasureofplanningreview.] (d)Promoteaesthetically-pleasingdesign whichfostersasenseofplace withinthe neighborhoodandappearsattractiveandinvitingfromsurroundingparcels;[Staff comment:Thesephraseswouldneverstanduptoacourtchallenge.Itisextremely doubtfulthattheCitycouldapproveordenyaPUDrequestbasedonwhetheritcreates a“senseofplace”.] (e)Incorporateextensivelandscapinginexcessofwhatisrequiredbycode;[Staffcomment: Thisisn’tabadgoalaslongasitisquantifiedsomehowintheordinance.] (f)Providehigh-qualitypark,openspace,andtrailopportunitiesthat meetor exceedthe expectationsestablishedintheComprehensivePlan;[Staffcomment:Suchspaces should“exceed”,notjust“meet”.Ifit’saPUD,thebaselineisalwaystodobetterthan theminimumexpectation.] (g)Provideaconvenientandefficientmulti-modaltransportationsystemtoservicethedaily needsofresidentsatpeakandnon-peakuselevels,withhighconnectivitytothelarger community. (h)Minimizetheextentofthe Promote development footprintandimpervioussurfacestothe extentpossible thatisdesigned toreduceinitialinfrastructurecostsandlong-term maintenanceandoperationalcosts;[Staffcomment:Therequirementdoesnot necessarilyleadtotheobjectiveinthisitem.AndIcouldimaginemanyPUDsdoingthe opposite–maximizingtheextentofthedevelopmentfootprintwhenyouarelookingata moreurbanproject,whichwouldbeoffsetbyalargercontributiontotheCity’spublic openspaceefforts. Formatted:Font:NotBold Thisalsoleadstoanotherissuegenerally–thisPUDordinanceissetuptopresumethat PUDsareself-containedunits,ratherthanpartsofthewhole.EveryPUDshouldnotbe requiredtohaveitscomponentproportionofallpublicservices(especiallyopenspace). Geographically,youmaynotwantonePUDtoprovideopenspace,inexchangeforthe abilitytoacquireitonaneighboringpiece. Thiscommentalsoimplicatesthenextitem,whichpresumesthatPUDswillbedesigned tobelessurbaninnature.ThisisaviewofPUDthathasbeenpromotedbyrural ecologists,andcanhavesomeexcellentapplicationforlargeresidentialplats,butmay becompletelyinappropriateforacommercial/industrialPUD,orforanextensivemulti- familydevelopment. Perhapsthiscouldallbemitigatedbyadditionaltextintheintrotothissection, explainingthattheseelementsmayormaynotbeappropriateinallcircumstances,and thattheCitywillidentifythemostapplicablegoalsfortheproposedPUDasaroleofthe collaborativeteam(?). (i)Whereapplicable,Mmaximizetheuseofecologically-basedapproachestostormwater management,restoreorenhanceon-siteecologicalsystems,andprotectoff-site ecologicalsystemsincludingtheapplicationofLowImpactDevelopment(LID) practices;[Staffcomment:seecommentabove.] (j)Fosterininclusivecommunitybyprovidingacomplementarymixoflifecyclehousing; (k)PreserveandprotectimportantecologicalareasidentifiedontheCity’snaturalresource inventory(NRI); (8)AreasofFlexibility (a)TheCityshallconsideranincreaseinthe numberof overallunitsdensityorintensityof theproject,alongwith andassociated related reductionsinlotwidthandsizeifthePUD providessubstantiallymoresiteamenitiesandpublicvalues,asoutlinedinSection 2.4(P)(7),thancouldbeachievedinaconventional residential developmentforthe applicable zoningdistrictlandusezone.[Staffcomment:Manyprojectswillbemixeduse orexclusivelycommercialand/orindustrial.“Unit”countand“lotsize”isnot necessarilyrelevanttomanyPUDdesigns–theissueismorelikelytobe“density”or “intensity”.] (b)TheCity shall may consideradecreaseintheamountofroadwidthrequiredorright-of- wayrequirementsifthePUDprovidessubstantiallymoresiteamenities,asoutlinedin Section2.4(P)(7)–andparticularlythoseamenitiesthatwouldmitigatetrafficconcerns-, thanarefoundinaconventional residential developmentfortheapplicablezoning district.Specificationsandstandardsforstreets,utilities,andotherpublicfacilitiesshall beatthediscretionofCityCouncilandmustprotectthehealth,safety,comfort, Formatted:Font:NotBold,NotHighlight Formatted:Font:NotBold,Italic,Fontcolor: Accent3 Formatted:Font:NotBold,NotHighlight Formatted:Font:NotBold,NotHighlight aesthetics,economicviability,andgeneralwelfareofthecity.[Staffcomment:Asa generalrule,theCityshouldsetreasonable,sustainableroadwidthrulesandstickby them.Thisisapublicsafetyissue,notsomethingtobebarteredoffbecauseadeveloper proposesmorestoneonhishousefacades.Thus,therecommendationheresuggeststhat anyPUDnegotiationonthisissuerelatestotrafficsafetyimprovements.] (c)TheCityshallconsiderflexibilitywithregardtolotsize,width,anddepthwhen reviewingaPUDrezoningrequest.Specificationsandstandardsforlotsshallbeatthe discretionofCityCouncil,andshallencourageadesirablelivingenvironmentwhich assistsinachievingthegoalssetoutforPUDs. (d)TheCityshallconsiderflexibilityinthephasingofaPUDdevelopment.Changestothe proposedstagingortimingofaPUDmaybeapprovedbytheCityCouncilwhen necessaryorontheshowingofgoodcausebythedeveloper. (9)PUDProcedure AllrequestsforrezoningtoPlannedUnitDevelopmentshallfollowthestepsoutlinedbelow. (a)Collaborativeprocessandprojectgoalsetting Thecollaborativeprocessandprojectgoalsettingstepisintendedtoallowtheapplicant tomeetwithmembersoftheCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentandappointedand electedofficialstogainanunderstandingofthepublicvaluesrelatedtodevelopmentof thesubjectsite.Thefeedbackreceivedduringthisstepwillprovideguidancetothe applicanton things elementsandobjectives toincorporateintoafutureconceptplan. [Staffcomment:Editorial] (i)InitiationofProceedings ArequestforaPUDConceptPlanReviewshallbeinitiatedbyapplicationofthe propertyownerorotherpersonhavingauthoritytofileanapplicationpursuantto Section2.3(B),AuthoritytoFileApplications. (ii)Application 1.AllapplicationsforaPUDCollaborativeprocessandprojectgoalsettingsession shallbeinaccordancewithSection2.3,CommonReviewRequirements. 2.Inadditiontocommonreviewrequirements,asiteanalysisshallbesubmittedin anticipationofthepre-applicationactivitieswhichincludesthefollowing information: a.Locationofwoodedareasorsignificantfeatures(environmental,historical, cultural)oftheparcel; b.Indicatethebasefloodelevationlevel(ifapplicable)andshowthegeneral locationoffloodwaysand/orfloodfringeareas; c.Delineationoftheordinaryhighwaterlevelsofallwaterbodies; Formatted:Font:NotBold,Italic,Fontcolor: Accent3 Formatted:Font:NotBold,Italic,Fontcolor: Accent3 Formatted:Font:NotBold,NotHighlight Formatted:Font:NotBold,NotHighlight d.Delineationoftheshorelanddistrictboundary(ifapplicable); e.Generallocationsofwetlands(ifapplicable); f.Calculationofgrossacresonthesiteproposedfordevelopment; f.g.Calculationofnetacresonthesiteproposedfordevelopment,includinga calculationof,anddeductionfromthegrossacreageof,allwetlands, floodplains,slopesofmorethan18%,significantwoodlands,areasidentified intheCity’sNaturalResourcesInventory,andanyotherunbuildableareasof theprojectsite. g.h.Indicationofneighboringlandusessurroundingtheproposeddevelopment site.[Staffcomment:Thepreliminaryanalysisshouldidentifybothgross andnetusable/buildableacreage,alongwithanestimateofsitedevelopment capacityunderexistingzoning.ToknowwhethertheCityisaccomplishing anything,andwhetherwhatyouaretradingisreasonable,youshouldhavea baselinedevelopmentplanthatshowssitecapacity–almostanydeveloper willhavetakenthissteptogivethemanideaofwhattheirROIwouldbeata certainlandprice–theyhavetoinordertoknowwhethertheycaneven makeanofferontheland.Anditcanserveasaninvaluablebaselineforthe City’sreviewofthePUDdesign. (iii)CollaborativeProcessandProjectGoalSettingProcess 1.Theapplicantshallmeetwiththecitystaffforapre-applicationconferenceprior tosubmittalofaconceptplan application tothecity.Theprimarypurposeofthe conferenceistoallowtheapplicantandstaffanopportunitytoreviewthe comprehensiveplanandtomakeapreliminarydeterminationiftheproposalis conducivetoaPUDrezoning. 2.Citystaffandtheapplicantshallworktogethertoscheduleaconcurrent worksessionwithpolicymakersofthecity(applicablecommissionsandCity Council)todiscussthepublicvaluesonthesiteusingtheestablishedpublic valuesinSection2.4(P)(7)asaguideline.Theresultofthismeetingwillbea publicvaluesstatement.[Staffcomment:Itwouldbevaluabletoexpectthe developertoprovideacommentaryontheeconomicfeasibilityoftheCity’s objectivestohelpformtheValuesStatement.Ofcourse,mostdevelopersare goingtoraiseconcernsaboutdevelopmentcosts,butinmostcollaborative processes,oneofthepointsoftheeffortistogetthedeveloper’sinputon economicfeasibility–otherwiseit’snotmuchdifferentthanthetypicalPUD processwheretheCityasksforadditionalstuff,andthedevelopersquirmsuntil heobtainsanapproval.Thecollaborativeprocessisintendedsetoutrealistic goalsearly,whichinturnaresupposedtoavoidtheneedforongoing negotiationslater. 3.Atanappropriatepointduringtheprocess,theapplicantshallholda neighborhoodmeeting.Thecityandallownersofpropertywithin1,000feetof Formatted:Tabstops:Notat4" theproposedPUD(oralargerareaasdeterminedbytheCommunity DevelopmentDepartment)shallbegivennoticeofthemeeting.Thepurposeof themeetingistoinformtheneighborhoodoftheproposedPUD,discussthe conceptsandbasisfortheplanbeingdevelopedandtoobtaininformationand suggestionsfromtheneighborhood. 4.Theapplicantshallberesponsibleforthecostsincurredbythecityforattorney, engineering,planning,orother consultant City-incurred fees costs duringthese pre-conceptplanactivities.[Staffcomment:Thereareprobablyotherfeesthat justconsultantfees–Citystaffcharges,permitapplicationfees,etc.)] (b)PUDConceptPlan Priortosubmittingformalpreliminaryplatandrezoningapplicationsfortheproposed development,theapplicantshallprepareaninformalconceptplanandpresentittothe appropriatecommissionsandCityCouncilataconcurrentworksession,asscheduledby theCommunityDevelopmentDepartment.Thepurposeofthismeetingistodetermineif allpartiesareonacommontrackandifthedevelopmentreflectsthestatedpublic values;.TheapplicantmayrequestthattheConceptandDevelopmentStagePUD applicationsbeconsideredconcurrently.Allowanceforconcurrentreviewshallbeatthe solediscretionoftheCity,andtheapplicantassumesanyrisk,financialorotherwise,of proceedingwithplandevelopmentbeyondthestageatwhichtheCityhasidentifiedPUD reviewisofficiallyunderconsideration.Withoutspecificwrittenauthorizationfromthe CommunityDevelopment,noapplicationforDevelopmentStagePUDshallbe consideredcompletepriortoCityCouncilactionontheConceptStagePUD.[Staff comment:IftheCityisgoingtoallowconcurrentConceptandPreliminaryapplications, itneedstobestatedexplicitly.Thislanguageisintendedtospecifytherequirementsfor concurrentapplications.] (i)InitiationofProceedings ArequestforaPUDConceptPlanReviewshallbeinitiatedbyapplicationofthe propertyownerorotherpersonhavingauthoritytofileanapplicationpursuantto Section2.3(B),AuthoritytoFileApplications. (ii)Application 1.AllapplicationsforaPUDConceptPlanReviewshallbeinaccordancewith Section2.3,CommonReviewRequirements. 2.Inadditiontocommonreviewrequirements,applicationsforaPUDConcept PlanReviewshallalsoincludeatleasttheinformationinSection2.4(P)(9)(b)(iii) belowtobeconsideredcomplete(exceptasexemptedbytheCommunity DevelopmentDepartment). (iii)SpecificPUDConceptPlanSubmittalRequirements [Staffcomment:Inthelist below,theOrdinanceshouldbedefiningbothgrossandnetdensity,howdensityis Formatted:Font:NotBold,NotHighlight calculated,unitcounts,quantitiesbylandusecategory,buildings(notjustlots), delineationbetweenpublicandprivateservices(e.g.utilities,openspace,etc.).This sectionshouldalsogranttheCDDtheauthoritytorequireadditionalinformation beforeaConceptPlanappisconsideredcompleteforreview.] Anapplicantshallprovidethefollowinginformationunlesswaivedbystaff: 1.Alistingofcontactinformationincludingname(s),address(es)andphone number(s)of:theownerofrecord,authorizedagentsorrepresentatives,engineer, surveyor,andanyotherrelevantassociates; 2.Alistingofthefollowingsitedata:Address,currentzoning,parcelsizeinacres andsquarefeetandcurrentlegaldescription(s); 3.Anupdatedsiteanalysisincorporatinganyadditionalfeaturesorrequested changesidentifiedduringthecollaborativeprocessandprojectgoalsetting session; 4.Anarrativeexplaininghowtheidentifiedpublicvaluesforthesiteareaddressed bytheconceptplan; 5.Alistingofgeneralinformationincludingthenumberofproposed lots residential units,commercialandindustriallandusesbycategoryofuse,publicuseareas includingadescriptionofproposeduse,andanyotherlanduseproposedaspart ofthePUDandacalculationofgrosslandarea; 6.Calculationoftheproposeddensityoftheprojectandthepotentialdensityunder standardzoningregulations,includingbothgrossdensityandnetdensity, accountingfordevelopableandundevelopableland.Undevelopablelandshall includeallwetlands,floodplains,sensitiveecologicalareasidentifiedinthe NaturalResourceInventory,slopesgreaterthan18%,poorsoils,andareasof concentratedwoodlands. 7.Outlineadevelopmentscheduleindicatingtheapproximatedatewhen constructionoftheproject,orstagesofthesame,canbeexpectedtobeginandbe completed(includingtheproposedphasingofconstructionofpublic improvementsandrecreationalandcommonspaceareas). 8.AConceptPUDPlanillustratingthenatureandtypeofproposeddevelopment. Ataminimum,theplanshouldshow: a.Areacalculationsforgrosslandarea b.Existingzoningdistrict(s) c.Layoutofproposedlotsandproposeduses.Denoteoutlotsplannedfor publicdedicationand/oropenspace(schools,parks,etc.) d.Areacalculationsforeachparcel e.Generallocationofwetlandsand/orwatercoursesoverthepropertyand within200feetoftheperimeterofthesubdivisionparcel f.Locationofexistingandproposedstreetswithinandimmediatelyadjacentto thesubdivisionparcel g.Proposedsidewalksandtrails h.Proposedparkingareas i.Proposedparks,commonareas,andpreservationeasements(indicatepublic vs.privateifapplicable) j.Generallocationofwoodedareasorsignificantfeatures(environmental, historical,cultural)oftheparcel k.Locationofutilitysystemsthatwillservetheproperty l.Other:Anapplicantmaysubmitanyadditionalinformationthatmayexplain theproposedPUD. (iv)PUDConceptPlanReview 1.UponreceivingacompletePUDconceptplanapplication,theCommunity DevelopmentDepartment,alongwithotherdesignatedstaff,shallreviewthe proposalandgenerateastaffreportanalyzingtheproposalagainstthe expectationsforPUDs.Thereportshallbeforwardedtotheappropriate commissions—asdeterminedbytheCommunityDevelopmentDepartment — andtheCityCouncilforreview.[Staffcomment:Theoriginallanguageimplies concurrentcommissionandCouncilreview–obviouslynottheintent.] 2.CommissionsreceivingthereportshallreviewthePUDrezoningrequest,and makearecommendationtotheCityCouncilwithregardtotheplatlayout, design,density,uses,deviations,andachievedpublicvaluesoftheconceptplan; ThePlanningCommissionshallberesponsiblefortheformalcommentstothe CityCouncil.Otherstaffandcommissionreportsshallbeprovidedtothe PlanningCommissionandmadeapartofthePlanningCommission’sreport. 3.TheCouncilshallconsidertherecommendationsofthecommissionsthathave conductedareview,andprovidefeedbacktotheapplicantontheproposedpublic values,proposeddeviations,andanyotheraspectoftheapplication.The Councilshalleithermakeamotionthattheapplicant—iftheychooseto proceed—moveforwardwiththePUDpreliminaryplatandrezoningrequests,or directtheapplicanttosubmitadevelopmentapplicationusingconventional zoningdistrictstandards.TheCouncilshallmakeitsfindingwithinthetime allottedbyMinn.Stat.Section15.99,andmaytakeuptheapplicationwithout PlanningCommissionactionifthePlanningCommissionhasnotactedwithin sixty(60)daysofitsoriginalpublichearingdate.TheCityCouncil’sfindings areexplicitlynotanapprovaloftheproject,andareintendedtorepresentthe complianceoftheproposedprojectwiththePublicValuesStatement,the applicablezoningregulations,andtheComprehensivePlan.[Staffcomment:This processdirectionneedstoaddresstheimpactsofMinn.Stat.15.99,authorityfor Counciltotakeactionwithoutcommissionreports(incasetheydon’tactina timelymanner),authoritytotableand/orseekamendments,potentialreferralfor EAW/AUARprocess,andpossiblyotheroutcomes.Inaddition,thissection Formatted:NotHighlight shouldexplicitlystatethatCouncildirectiontomoveforwardisNOTatapproval thatgrantsanydevelopmentrights,butratherawillingnesstocontinue exploringtheuseofthePUDflexibilityforthesubjectsite.] 4.AftertheCitypolicymakershavereviewedandcommentedontheConceptPUD plan,citystaffshallmeetwith any other responsible agencies,asapplicable,to exploreopportunitiesofpartnershiptoenhancethestatedpublicvalues. (c)PUDPreliminaryPlatandRezoning –DevelopmentStagePUD (i)InitiationofProceedings 1.ConcurrentapplicationsforrezoningtoPUDandaPreliminaryPlatshallbe submittedtotheCitywithinoneyearoftheCityCouncil’s recommendation findings onthePUDConceptPlan.[Staffcomment:Counciltakesanactionor makesafinding,notarecommendation.]Failuretosubmitapplicationsfor rezoningtoPUDandaPreliminaryPlatwithin the oneyear timeframe ofthe CityCouncil’sfindings willrequiretheapplicanttobegintheprocess withthe CollaborativePUDmeeting.anewfrom thatpointforward.[Thisrequirement needsclarificationastotiminganddatespecifics.] 2.TherequestsforrezoningtoPUDandPreliminaryPlatshallbeinitiatedby applicationofthepropertyownerorotherpersonhavingauthoritytofilean applicationpursuanttoSection2.3(B),AuthoritytoFileApplications.The DevelopmentStagePUDrequestconstitutesaseparateapplicationandshallbe subjecttonewtimelinesforthepurposesofMinn.Stat.Section15.99. (ii)Application 1.AllapplicationsforrezoningtoPUDandPreliminaryPlatshallbeinaccordance withSection2.3,CommonReviewRequirements. 2.TheapplicationforrezoningtoPUDshallbeinaccordancewithSection2.4(B), ZoningOrdinanceTextandZoningMapAmendments. 3.TheapplicationforPreliminaryPlatshallbeinaccordancewithCityCodeTitle 11,Chapter4,DataRequiredforPreliminaryandFinalPlats;andshallinclude theadditionalinformationrequirementslistedinSection2.4(P)(9)(c)(iii)below tobeconsideredcomplete(exceptasexemptedbytheCommunityDevelopment Department). 4.IfthePUDisproposedtodevelopoveratimeframeexceedingtwoyears,aPUD Master Phasing Plan [Staffcomment:Thisappearstoonlyberequiredfora phasedproject–thatis,the“MasterPlan”isreallyonlya“PhasingPlan.]for theentireproject(tobecompletedinphases)maybesubmitted.Subsequent PUDFinalPlanapplicationswouldonlygrantapprovalforanindividualphase. (iii)SpecificPUDPreliminaryPlatSubmittalRequirements Formatted:NotHighlight Formatted:NotHighlight Formatted:Font:NotBold,NotHighlight Formatted:Font:NotBold,NotHighlight Formatted:Font:NotBold,NotHighlight AnapplicantshallprovideaseparatePUDDevelopmentPlanclearlydelineatingthe proposeddevelopmentandallfeaturesnotconsistentwithunderlyingzoning regulations(e.g.setbackdeviations).Ataminimum,theplanshouldshow:[Staff comment:Thislistneedstoincludelanduses,netdevelopablelandbylanduse, buildingdesignandmaterials,landscapingdetail,screening,fencing,othersite improvements,proposedgrading,proposedstreetsandutilities,impactsonnatural resources,ThislistseemsveryincompletetomeforPUDatthisstage–anditalso seemsmoreheavilyweightedtoaplatreviewthanaPUDreview.Therequired submissionlistjustseemstobemissingalotofinformationwewouldnormally expectatthisstage.] 1.Administrativeinformation(includingidentificationofthedrawingasa “PreliminaryPUDDevelopmentPlan,”theproposednameofthesubdivision, contactinformationforthedeveloperandindividualpreparingtheplan,signature ofthesurveyorcertifyingthedocument,dateofplanpreparationorrevision,and agraphicscaleandtruenortharrow); 2.Areacalculationsforgrosslandarea,wetlandareas,wetlandbuffers,right-of- waydedications,conservationareas,andproposedpublicandprivateparks; 3.Existingzoningdistrict(s); 4.Layoutofproposedlotswithfuturelotandblocknumbers.Theperimeter boundarylineofthesubdivisionshouldbedistinguishablefromtheother propertylines.Denoteoutlotsplannedforpublicdedicationand/oropenspace (schools,parks,etc.); 5.Areacalculationsforeachparcel; 6.Proposedsetbacksoneachlot(formingthebuildingpad)andcalculated buildablearea; 7.Proposedgrosshardcoverallowanceperlot(ifapplicable); 8.Existingcontoursatintervalsoftwofeet.Contoursmustextendaminimumof 200feetbeyondtheboundaryoftheparcel(s)inquestion; 9.Delineationofwetlandsand/orwatercoursesoverthepropertyandwithin200 feetoftheperimeterofthesubdivisionparcel; 10.Delineationoftheordinaryhighwaterlevelsofallwaterbodies; 10.11.Grading,drainageanderosioncontrolplanpreparedbyaregistered professionalengineer,providingallinformationoutlinedinMonticelloZoning Code,Chapter4,Section10(C). 11.12.Location,width,andnamesofexistingandproposedstreetswithinand immediatelyadjacenttothesubdivisionparcel; 12.13.Easementsandrights-of-waywithinoradjacenttothesubdivision parcel(s); 14.Thelocationandorientationofproposedbuildings; 13.15.Coloredbuildingelevationswhichdetailthematerialsbeingused. Formatted:Tabstops:Notat0.63" 14.16.Proposedsidewalksandtrails; 17.Vehicularcirculationsystemshowinglocationanddimensionforalldriveways, parkingspaces,parkinglotaisles,serviceroads,loadingareas,firelanes, emergencyaccess,ifnecessary,publicandprivatestreets,alleys,sidewalks,bike paths,directionoftrafficflowandtrafficcontroldevices. 15.Proposedparkingareas; 18.Lightinglocation,styleandmountingandlightdistributionplan. 19.Proposedparks,commonareas,andpreservationeasements(indicatepublicvs. privateifapplicable); 20.Landscapeplanpreparedbyaqualifiedprofessionalprovidingallinformation outlinedinMonticelloZoningOrdinanceSection4.1(D).includingplanting counts,sizesandspecies. 21.Locationanddetailofsignageprovidingallpertinentinformationoutlinedin MonticelloZoningOrdinanceSection2.4(K)(3)(b). 16.22.Location,accessandscreeningdetailoflargetrashhandlingand recyclingcollectionareasincompliancewiththerequirementsofMonticello ZoningOrdinanceSection5.3(D)(31). 17.23.AnyotherinformationasdirectedbytheCommunityDevelopment Department. (iv)PUDPreliminaryPlatandRezoningtoPUDReview 1.TheapplicationforrezoningtoPUDshallbereviewedinaccordancewith Section2.4(B),ZoningOrdinanceTextandZoningMapAmendments. 2.TheapplicationforPreliminaryPlatshallbereviewedinaccordancewithCity CodeTitle11,Chapter3,Section2,PreliminaryPlatProcedure. 3.Aspartofthereviewprocessforbothapplications,theCommunityDevelopment Departmentshallgenerateananalysisoftheproposalagainsttheexpectationsfor PUDsandthepreviouslyestablishedpublicvaluesstatementtoformulatea recommendationregardingtherezoningtotheplanningcommissionandCity Council. 4.Theplanningcommissionshallholdapublichearingandconsiderthe application’sconsistencywiththeintentandpurposeofthePUDand comprehensiveplangoals.Theplanningcommissionshallmake recommendationstotheCityCouncilonthemerit,neededchanges,and suggestedconditionsoftheproposedrezoning,preliminaryplatandPUD developmentplan. 5.InapprovingordenyingtheordinancetorezonethesubjectpropertytoPUD,the CityCouncilshallmakefindingsonthefollowing: a.ThePUDplanisconsistentwiththecity’scomprehensiveplan; Formatted:Indent:Left:1.25",Tabstops: 1.5",Listtab+Notat0.63" Formatted:Fontcolor:Auto Formatted:Tabstops:Notat0.63" Formatted:Indent:Left:1.25",Numbered+ Level:1+NumberingStyle:1,2,3,…+Start at:1+Alignment:Left+Alignedat:0.38"+ Tabafter:0.63"+Indentat:0.63",Tab stops:1.5",Listtab+Notat0.63" Formatted:Fontcolor:Auto Formatted:Tabstops:Notat0.63" b.ThePUDplanistailoredtothespecificcharacteristicsofthesiteand achievesahigherqualityofsiteplanningandgreaterpublicbenefitsthan wouldbeachievedunderconventionalprovisionsoftheordinance; c.ThePUDplanaddressesthepurposeandintentofthePUDrezoninglaidout inSection2.4(P)(1),andthepublicvaluesstatementestablishedatthe beginningoftheprocess d.ThePUDplanaddressestheexpectationsofaPUDlaidoutinSection 2.4(P)(7); e.ThePUDplanmaintainsorimprovestheefficiencyofpublicstreets,utilities, andotherpublicservices; f.ThePUDplanresultsindevelopmentcompatiblewithexistingadjacentand futureguidedlanduses; g.HowthePUDplanaddressesthepurposeandintentofthePUDrezoning laidoutinSection2.4(P)(1),andthepublicvaluesstatementestablishedat thebeginningoftheprocess. h.WhetherthePUDcanbeaccommodatedbyexistingpublicservices,suchas parks,police,fire,administration,andutilities,orthedeveloperhasprovided forthegrowthandextensionofsuchservicesasacomponentofthePUD. i.WhetherthePUDisdesignedtotakeadvantageof,andpreserve,thenatural featuresofthesubjectproperty,includingwaterways,forestedareas,natural prairie,topography,views,etc. 6.Anordinancerezoningthepropertyshallbeadoptedthatincludesaneffective datethatcoincideswiththeapprovalandrecordingoftheFinalPlatforthe property. (d)PUDFinalPlat (i)InitiationofProceedings 1.AfinalplatthatconformswiththepreliminaryplatandassociatedPUDrezoning ordinanceshallbesubmittedwithin180daysofapprovalofthe ordinanceand preliminaryplatapproval,unlessotherwiseextendedbytheCityCouncil.Ifthe applicantfailstosubmitafinalplatapplicationorextensionrequestwithinthis timeperiod,the zoning shallrevertbacktotheunderlyingzoningdistrictthrough arezoningordinanceadoptedbytheCityCouncilPUDapplicationshallbe consideredvoidandtheapplicantshallberequiredtobegintheprocesswiththe CollaborativePUDmeeting. 2.TherequestforPUDFinalPlatshallbeinitiatedbyapplicationoftheproperty ownerorotherpersonhavingauthoritytofileanapplicationpursuanttoSection 2.3(B),AuthoritytoFileApplications. (ii)Application Formatted:Font:NotBold Formatted:Font:NotBold Formatted:Indent:Left:1.5",Tabstops: 1.75",Listtab+Notat3.25" Formatted:Indent:Left:1.25",Tabstops: 1.5",Listtab+Notat2.38" Formatted:Font:NotBold,NotHighlight Formatted:Font:NotBold 1.AllapplicationsforPUDFinalPlatshallbeinaccordancewithSection2.3, CommonReviewRequirements. 2.TheapplicationforPUDFinalPlatshallbeinaccordancewithCityCodeTitle 11,Chapter4,DataRequiredforPreliminaryandFinalPlats. 3.Inadditiontogeneralcitycoderequirements,applicationsforaPUDFinalPlat shallalsoincludeatleasttheinformationinSection2.4(P)(9)(d)(iii)belowtobe consideredcomplete(exceptasexemptedbytheCommunityDevelopment DepartmentDirector). (iii)SpecificPUDFinalPlatSubmittalRequirements 1.IfaPUDMasterPlanfortheentireprojectwassubmittedandapprovedaspart ofthepreliminaryplatreview,anupdatedMasterPlanshallbesubmitted incorporatingallchangesrequiredbythepreliminaryplatapproval. 2.ThePUDDevelopmentPlanshallbeupdatedtoincorporateallchangesrequired bythepreliminaryplatandrezoningapprovals.Thisdocumentmustclearly showalldeviationsfromstandardzoningbeingapprovedaspartofthePUD. 3.TheCity andapplicant shallprepare,andtheCityandapplicantshallexecute,a developer’sagreementwhichreferencesallPUDplans,specifiespermitteduses, allowabledensities,developmentphasing,requiredimprovements,completion datesforimprovements,therequiredletterofcredit,allrequireddevelopment fees,escrows,andwarranties,andanyotherinformationdeemednecessaryby theCity.Thisclausewillnotworkaswritten.Adevelopmentagreementshould listtheresponsibilitiesofthedeveloperandtheCityatthetimeofapprovaland platting,andthePUDOrdinance shouldlistthelandusesandperformance standardsofthedistrict.TheDAwillonlybevaluablefordealingwiththe originaldeveloperattheonsetoftheproject–theordinancewillneedtoaddress theongoingoperationofthedistrict,includingsubsequentowners,landuse changes,newconstructionrequests,etc.,etc. 3.4.TheCityshall,uponrecordingoftheFinalPlat,publishthePUDOrdinance specifyinglanduses,densities,performancestandards,andongoinggeneral obligationsofoccupantsofthePUD.Suchordinanceshallcreateazoning districtthatisspecifictothepropertyforwhichthePUDwasapplied,andshall bedesignatedinsuchawayastobeabletomarktheofficialzoningmapto identifythePUDordinance.ThePUDordinanceshallalsodesignatethatsuch propertyistherebyrezonedtothePUDdistrictasadopted. 4.5.Up-to-datetitleevidenceforthesubjectpropertyinaformacceptabletotheCity shallbeprovidedaspartoftheapplicationforthePUDFinalPlat. 5.6.DevelopershallprovidewarrantydeedsforPropertybeingdedicatedtotheCity forallparks,outlots,etc.,freefromallliensandencumbrancesexceptas otherwisewaivedbytheCity Council. 6.7.Developershallprovidealleasementdedicationdocumentsforeasementsnot shownonthefinalplatincludingthosefortrails,ingress/egress,etc.,together Formatted:Font:NotBold,NotHighlight Formatted:Font:NotBold Formatted:Font:NotBold,Italic,Fontcolor: CustomColor(RGB(102,153,0)) Formatted:Fontcolor:Auto Formatted:Font:NotBold Formatted:Tabstops:Notat2.38" Formatted:Font:NotBold Formatted:Font:NotBold,NotHighlight withallnecessaryconsentstotheeasementbyexistingencumbrancersofthe property. (iv)PUDFinalPlatReview TheapplicationforPUDFinalPlatshallbereviewedinaccordancewithCityCode Title11,Chapter3,Section3,FinalPlatProcedure. (10)PUDAmendments ApprovedPUD’smaybeamendedfromtimetotimeasaresultofunforeseencircumstances, overlookedopportunities,orrequestsfromadeveloper.Atsuchatime,theapplicantshall makeanapplicationtothecityforaPUDamendment.Allsuchamendmentswillbe processedasoneofthefollowing: (a)AdministrativeAmendment –TheCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentmayapprove minorchangesinthelocation,placement,andheightofbuildingsifsuchchangesare requiredbyengineeringorothercircumstances,notforeseen atthetimethePUDFinal Planwasapproved,providedthechanges areindeedminor providedthechanges conform tothereviewcriteriaappliedbythePlanningCommissionandCityCouncil,andare consistentwithallrequirementsofthePUDordinance.Undernocircumstancesshallan administrativeamendmentallowadditionalstoriestobuildings,additionallots,or changestodesignatedusesestablishedaspartofthePUD. (b)PUDAdjustment –anadjustmenttoaPUDmaybemadethroughreviewandapproval byasimplemajorityvoteoftheCityCouncilwithorwithoutreferraltothePlanning Commission.Toqualifyforthisreview,theminoradjustmentshallnot: (i)Eliminate,diminishorbedisruptivetothepreservationandprotectionofsensitive sitefeatures. (ii)Eliminate,diminishorcompromisethehighqualityofsiteplanning,design, landscapingorbuildingmaterials. (iii)Altersignificantlythelocationofbuildings,parkingareasorroads. (iv)Increaseordecreasethenumberofresidentialdwellingunitsbymorethanfive percent. (v)Increasethegrossfloorareaofnon-residentialbuildingsbymorethanthreepercent orincreasethegrossfloorareaofanyindividualbuildingbymorethanfivepercent (residentiallotsnotguidedforspecificstructuresizesareexcludedfromthis requirement). (vi)Increasethenumberofstoriesofanybuilding. (vii)Decreasetheamountofopenspaceoralteritinsuchawayastochangeitsoriginal designorintendedfunctionoruse. (viii)Createnon-compliancewithany special conditionattachedtotheapprovalofthe FinalPUDPlan. Formatted:Font:NotBold,NotHighlight Formatted:Font:NotBold (c)PUDAmendment –anychangenotqualifyingforanadministrativeamendmentora PUDadjustmentshallrequireaPUDamendment.AnapplicationtoamendaPUDshall beadministeredinthesamemannerasthatrequiredforaninitialPUDbeginningatPUD PreliminaryPlat. (11)PUDCancellation APUDshallonlybecancelledandrevokedupontheCityCounciladoptinganordinance rescindingtheordinanceapprovingthePUD.Inanyevent,itshallnotbenecessaryforthe counciltofindthecreationofaPUDdistrictwasinerror.TheordinancerevokingthePUD shallincludeasectionrezoningthepropertytoagriculturaluse,ortheCityCouncilmay determinethatamoreappropriatebasezoningdistrictshouldbechosentofurthertheintent andobjectivesoftheComprehensivePlan.[Staffcomment:Rescindingtheordinancewould havetheeffectof“un-zoning”theproperty.Thisclauseneedssomework,sincerevocation probablyshouldrequireapublichearingandsomedueprocess,presumingthatapproval conferssomedevelopmentrights.Particularlywheretheremaybesomeconstructionthat hasoccurred,rescindingthePUDordinancewouldbeproblematic.] (12)Administration Ingeneral,thefollowingrulesshallapplytoallPUDs: (a)Rulesandregulations:NorequirementoutlinedinthePUDprocessshallrestricttheCity Councilfromtakingactiononanapplicationifnecessarytomeetstatemandatedtime deadlines; (b)PlanCertification:TheCitymayrequirethatPUDplansbe certified atthetimeof submittaland/oruponcompletionofconstruction. (c)(b)Preconstruction:Nobuildingpermitshallbegrantedforanybuildingonlandfor whichaPUDplanisintheprocessofreview,unlesstheproposedbuildingisallowed undertheexistingzoningandwillnotimpact,influence,orinterferewiththeproposed PUDplan. (d)(c)EffectonConveyedProperty.IntheeventanyrealpropertyintheapprovedPUD Agreementisconveyedintotal,orinpart,thebuyersthereofshallbeboundbythe provisionsoftheapprovedFinalPUDPlan constitutingapartthereof aswellasthePUD zoningordinance;provided,however,thatnothinghereinshallbeconstruedtocreate non-conforminglots,buildingsites,buildingsorusesbyvirtueofanysuchconveyance ofalot,buildingsite,buildingorpartofthedevelopmentcreatedpursuanttoandin conformancewiththeapprovedPUD. Formatted:Font:NotBold,NotHighlight Formatted:Font:NotBold,NotHighlight (A)PlannedUnitDevelopments (1)PurposeandIntent ThepurposeofthePlannedUnitDevelopment(PUD)zoningdistrictistoprovidegreater flexibilityinthedevelopmentofneighborhoodsandnon maximizepublicvaluesandachievemorecreativedevelopmentoutcomeswhile remainingeconomicallyviableandmarketable.Thisisachievedbyundertakinga collaborativeprocessthatresultsinadevelopmentoutcomeexceedingthatwhichis typicallyachievablethroughtheconventionalzoningdistrict todenythePUDrezoninganddirectthedevelopertore applicablezoningdistrict (2)InitiationofProceedings ApplicationsforaPUDshallbeinitiatedbyapplicationofthepropertyownerorother personhavingauthoritytofileanapplicationpursuanttoSection2.3(B),AuthoritytoFile Applications. (3)ReflectionontheOfficialZoningMap (a)PUDprovisionsprovideanoptionalmethodofregulatinglandusewhich permitsflexibilityinallowedusesandotherregulatingprovisions. circumstances,however,rulesandregulationsgoverningthe otherzoningregul applywithinthePUD.Assuch,a ofaPUDagreementshallrequirethepropertyinquestionberezonedtoPUD. PUDDistrict,aspecificordinanceshallbeadopted,alongwithatrackingdesignationfor useontheofficialzoningmaptodistinguishitfromotherPUDdistrictsandidentifythe adoptedordinanceintheCityCode. parcel,nobuildingpermitshallbeissuedforthatparcelwhichisnotinconformancewith theapprovedPUDPlan,thecurrentMinnesotaStateBuildingCodeandallassociated documents,andwithallotherapplicableCityCodeprovisions. (b)AllPUDrezonin shallretaintheirzoningclassificationsofR theordinanceandresolutionswhichcreatedtheseareas. (4)PermittedLocationsforPUDrezoning ArezoningtoPUDmaybe area. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz PUDFinalPlat PUD Preliminary Plat &Rezoning REVIEW (Staff,applicable Commissions & Council) PUD Preliminary Plat and Rezoning APPLICATION PUD Concept Plan REVIEW (Staff,applicable Commissions & Council) PUD Concept Plan APPLICATION Collaborative Review (Staff,applicable Commissions & Council) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Collaborative Process PlannedUnitDevelopments PurposeandIntent urposeofthePlannedUnitDevelopment(PUD)zoningdistrictistoprovidegreater flexibilityinthedevelopmentofneighborhoodsandnon-residentialareasinorderto maximizepublicvaluesandachievemorecreativedevelopmentoutcomeswhile conomicallyviableandmarketable.Thisisachievedbyundertakinga collaborativeprocessthatresultsinadevelopmentoutcomeexceedingthatwhichis typicallyachievablethroughtheconventionalzoningdistrict.TheCityreservestheright ePUDrezoninganddirectthedevelopertore-applyunderthestandard applicablezoningdistrict. InitiationofProceedings ApplicationsforaPUDshallbeinitiatedbyapplicationofthepropertyownerorother personhavingauthoritytofileanapplicationpursuanttoSection2.3(B),AuthoritytoFile ReflectionontheOfficialZoningMap PUDprovisionsprovideanoptionalmethodofregulatinglandusewhich permitsflexibilityinallowedusesandotherregulatingprovisions. circumstances,however,rulesandregulationsgoverningthe original otherzoningregulationsfoundelsewhereintheCity’sordinances, applywithinthePUD.Assuch,approval ofaPlannedUnitDevelopmentandexecution ofaPUDagreementshallrequirethepropertyinquestionberezonedtoPUD. aspecificordinanceshallbeadopted,alongwithatrackingdesignationfor useontheofficialzoningmaptodistinguishitfromotherPUDdistrictsandidentifythe adoptedordinanceintheCityCode.OnceaPUDhasbeengrantedandisineffectfora parcel,nobuildingpermitshallbeissuedforthatparcelwhichisnotinconformancewith theapprovedPUDPlan,thecurrentMinnesotaStateBuildingCodeandallassociated documents,andwithallotherapplicableCityCodeprovisions. AllPUDrezoningsapprovedpriortotheeffectivedateofthisordinance shallretaintheirzoningclassificationsofR-PUD,andshallcontinuetobegovernedby theordinanceandresolutionswhichcreatedtheseareas. PermittedLocationsforPUDrezoning ArezoningtoPUDmaybe requestedforanyresidential,commercial,orindustrial urposeofthePlannedUnitDevelopment(PUD)zoningdistrictistoprovidegreater residentialareasinorderto maximizepublicvaluesandachievemorecreativedevelopmentoutcomeswhile conomicallyviableandmarketable.Thisisachievedbyundertakinga collaborativeprocessthatresultsinadevelopmentoutcomeexceedingthatwhichis heCityreservestheright applyunderthestandard ApplicationsforaPUDshallbeinitiatedbyapplicationofthepropertyownerorother personhavingauthoritytofileanapplicationpursuanttoSection2.3(B),AuthoritytoFile PUDprovisionsprovideanoptionalmethodofregulatinglandusewhich permitsflexibilityinallowedusesandotherregulatingprovisions.Insome original zoningdistrict,or ationsfoundelsewhereintheCity’sordinances,maybeappropriateto ofaPlannedUnitDevelopmentandexecution ofaPUDagreementshallrequirethepropertyinquestionberezonedtoPUD.Foreach aspecificordinanceshallbeadopted,alongwithatrackingdesignationfor useontheofficialzoningmaptodistinguishitfromotherPUDdistrictsandidentifythe OnceaPUDhasbeengrantedandisineffectfora parcel,nobuildingpermitshallbeissuedforthatparcelwhichisnotinconformancewith theapprovedPUDPlan,thecurrentMinnesotaStateBuildingCodeandallassociated gsapprovedpriortotheeffectivedateofthisordinance PUD,andshallcontinuetobegovernedby requestedforanyresidential,commercial,orindustrial zoned (5)PUDQualifications RezoningstoPUDwillbeconsideredonlyforareasoflandinsingleownershiporcontrol, exceptinthefollowingcircumstances: (a)Naturalfeaturesofthelandaresuchthatdevelopmentunderstandardzoningregulations wouldnotbeappropriateinordertoconservesuchfeatures; (b)ThelandisintendedtobedevelopedinaccordancewithapriorPUDadjacenttoor acrossthestreetfromthesubjectproperty; (c)ThePUDprocessisdesirabletoensurecompatibilityandcarefulconsiderationofthe effectofadevelopmentonsurroundinglanduses. (d)Multiplepartyownershipisadequatelysecuredthroughacorporation,partnership,or otherlegalentitythatwillensuretheabilitytofulfillalloftheobligationsofthePUD process,includingapprovals,development,andsecurities. (6)PermittedUsesWithinPUDs UseswithinaPUDshallbegovernedbytheordinanceestablishingthePUDandbythe conditions,ifany,imposedbytheCityintheapprovalprocessandPUDdocuments (7)ExpectationsofaDevelopmentSeekingaRezoningtoPUD Theprovisionsofthissectionareintendedtoachievethefollowingpublicvalueswithina PUDzoningdistrictandassociatedsubdivision: (a)Ensurehighqualityconstructionstandardsandtheuseofhighqualityconstruction materials; (b)Promoteavarietyofhousingstyleswhichincludefeaturessuchassideorrearloaded garages,frontporches,varyingroofpitches,andfoursidedarchitecture/articulation; (c)Eliminaterepetitionofsimilarhousingtypesbyencouragingahousingmixturethat diversifiesthearchitecturalqualitiesofaneighborhood; (d)Promoteaesthetically-pleasingdesignwithintheneighborhoodandappearsattractiveand invitingfromsurroundingparcels; (e)Incorporateextensivelandscapinginexcessofwhatisrequiredbycode; (f)Providehigh-qualitypark,openspace,andtrailopportunitiesthatexceedthe expectationsestablishedintheComprehensivePlan; (g)Provideaconvenientandefficientmulti-modaltransportationsystemtoservicethedaily needsofresidentsatpeakandnon-peakuselevels,withhighconnectivitytothelarger community. (h)Promotedevelopmentthatisdesignedtoreduceinitialinfrastructurecostsandlong-term maintenanceandoperationalcosts; (i)Whereapplicable,maximizetheuseofecologically-basedapproachestostormwater management,restoreorenhanceon-siteecologicalsystems,andprotectoff-site ecologicalsystemsincludingtheapplicationofLowImpactDevelopment(LID) practices; (j)Fosterininclusivecommunitybyprovidingacomplementarymixoflifecyclehousing; (k)PreserveandprotectimportantecologicalareasidentifiedontheCity’snaturalresource inventory(NRI); (8)AreasofFlexibility (a)TheCityshallconsideranincreaseinthedensityorintensityoftheproject,alongwith relatedreductionsinlotwidthandsizeifthePUDprovidessubstantiallymoresite amenitiesandpublicvalues,asoutlinedinSection2.4(P)(7),thancouldbeachievedina conventionaldevelopmentfortheapplicablelandusezone. (b)TheCitymayconsideradecreaseintheamountofroadwidthrequiredorright-of-way requirementsifthePUDprovidessubstantiallymoresiteamenities,asoutlinedinSection 2.4(P)(7)–andparticularlythoseamenitiesthatwouldmitigatetrafficconcerns-thanare foundinaconventionaldevelopmentfortheapplicablezoningdistrict.Specifications andstandardsforstreets,utilities,andotherpublicfacilitiesshallbeatthediscretionof CityCouncilandmustprotectthehealth,safety,comfort,aesthetics,economicviability, andgeneralwelfareofthecity. (c)TheCityshallconsiderflexibilitywithregardtolotsize,width,anddepthwhen reviewingaPUDrezoningrequest.Specificationsandstandardsforlotsshallbeatthe discretionofCityCouncil,andshallencourageadesirablelivingenvironmentwhich assistsinachievingthegoalssetoutforPUDs. (d)TheCityshallconsiderflexibilityinthephasingofaPUDdevelopment.Changestothe proposedstagingortimingofaPUDmaybeapprovedbytheCityCouncilwhen necessaryorontheshowingofgoodcausebythedeveloper. (9)PUDProcedure AllrequestsforrezoningtoPlannedUnitDevelopmentshallfollowthestepsoutlinedbelow. (a)Collaborativeprocessandprojectgoalsetting Thecollaborativeprocessandprojectgoalsettingstepisintendedtoallowtheapplicant tomeetwithmembersoftheCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentandappointedand electedofficialstogainanunderstandingofthepublicvaluesrelatedtodevelopmentof thesubjectsite.Thefeedbackreceivedduringthisstepwillprovideguidancetothe applicantonelementsandobjectivestoincorporateintoafutureconceptplan. (i)InitiationofProceedings ArequestforaPUDConceptPlanReviewshallbeinitiatedbyapplicationofthe propertyownerorotherpersonhavingauthoritytofileanapplicationpursuantto Section2.3(B),AuthoritytoFileApplications. (ii)Application 1.AllapplicationsforaPUDCollaborativeprocessandprojectgoalsettingsession shallbeinaccordancewithSection2.3,CommonReviewRequirements. 2.Inadditiontocommonreviewrequirements,asiteanalysisshallbesubmittedin anticipationofthepre-applicationactivitieswhichincludesthefollowing information: a.Locationofwoodedareasorsignificantfeatures(environmental,historical, cultural)oftheparcel; b.Indicatethebasefloodelevationlevel(ifapplicable)andshowthegeneral locationoffloodwaysand/orfloodfringeareas; c.Delineationoftheordinaryhighwaterlevelsofallwaterbodies; d.Delineationoftheshorelanddistrictboundary(ifapplicable); e.Generallocationsofwetlands(ifapplicable); f.Calculationofgrossacresonthesiteproposedfordevelopment; g.Calculationofnetacresonthesiteproposedfordevelopment,includinga calculationof,anddeductionfromthegrossacreageof,allwetlands, floodplains,slopesofmorethan18%,significantwoodlands,areasidentified intheCity’sNaturalResourcesInventory,andanyotherunbuildableareasof theprojectsite. h.Indicationofneighboringlandusessurroundingtheproposeddevelopment site.. (iii)CollaborativeProcessandProjectGoalSettingProcess 1.Theapplicantshallmeetwiththecitystaffforapre-applicationconferenceprior tosubmittalofaconceptplanapplicationtothecity.Theprimarypurposeofthe conferenceistoallowtheapplicantandstaffanopportunitytoreviewthe comprehensiveplanandtomakeapreliminarydeterminationiftheproposalis conducivetoaPUDrezoning. 2.Citystaffandtheapplicantshallworktogethertoscheduleaconcurrent worksessionwithpolicymakersofthecity(applicablecommissionsandCity Council)todiscussthepublicvaluesonthesiteusingtheestablishedpublic valuesinSection2.4(P)(7)asaguideline.Theresultofthismeetingwillbea publicvaluesstatement. 3.Atanappropriatepointduringtheprocess,theapplicantshallholda neighborhoodmeeting.Thecityandallownersofpropertywithin1,000feetof theproposedPUD(oralargerareaasdeterminedbytheCommunity DevelopmentDepartment)shallbegivennoticeofthemeeting.Thepurposeof themeetingistoinformtheneighborhoodoftheproposedPUD,discussthe conceptsandbasisfortheplanbeingdevelopedandtoobtaininformationand suggestionsfromtheneighborhood. 4.Theapplicantshallberesponsibleforthecostsincurredbythecityforattorney, engineering,planning,orotherCity-incurredcostsduringthesepre-conceptplan activities. (b)PUDConceptPlan Priortosubmittingformalpreliminaryplatandrezoningapplicationsfortheproposed development,theapplicantshallprepareaninformalconceptplanandpresentittothe appropriatecommissionsandCityCouncilataconcurrentworksession,asscheduledby theCommunityDevelopmentDepartment.Thepurposeofthismeetingistodetermineif allpartiesareonacommontrackandifthedevelopmentreflectsthestatedpublicvalues. TheapplicantmayrequestthattheConceptandDevelopmentStagePUDapplicationsbe consideredconcurrently.Allowanceforconcurrentreviewshallbeatthesolediscretion oftheCity,andtheapplicantassumesanyrisk,financialorotherwise,ofproceedingwith plandevelopmentbeyondthestageatwhichtheCityhasidentifiedPUDreviewis officiallyunderconsideration.Withoutspecificwrittenauthorizationfromthe CommunityDevelopment,noapplicationforDevelopmentStagePUDshallbe consideredcompletepriortoCityCouncilactionontheConceptStagePUD. (i)InitiationofProceedings ArequestforaPUDConceptPlanReviewshallbeinitiatedbyapplicationofthe propertyownerorotherpersonhavingauthoritytofileanapplicationpursuantto Section2.3(B),AuthoritytoFileApplications. (ii)Application 1.AllapplicationsforaPUDConceptPlanReviewshallbeinaccordancewith Section2.3,CommonReviewRequirements. 2.Inadditiontocommonreviewrequirements,applicationsforaPUDConcept PlanReviewshallalsoincludeatleasttheinformationinSection2.4(P)(9)(b)(iii) belowtobeconsideredcomplete(exceptasexemptedbytheCommunity DevelopmentDepartment). (iii)SpecificPUDConceptPlanSubmittalRequirements Anapplicantshallprovidethefollowinginformationunlesswaivedbystaff: 1.Alistingofcontactinformationincludingname(s),address(es)andphone number(s)of:theownerofrecord,authorizedagentsorrepresentatives,engineer, surveyor,andanyotherrelevantassociates; 2.Alistingofthefollowingsitedata:Address,currentzoning,parcelsizeinacres andsquarefeetandcurrentlegaldescription(s); 3.Anupdatedsiteanalysisincorporatinganyadditionalfeaturesorrequested changesidentifiedduringthecollaborativeprocessandprojectgoalsetting session; 4.Anarrativeexplaininghowtheidentifiedpublicvaluesforthesiteareaddressed bytheconceptplan; 5.Alistingofgeneralinformationincludingthenumberofproposedresidential units,commercialandindustriallandusesbycategoryofuse,publicuseareas includingadescriptionofproposeduse,andanyotherlanduseproposedaspart ofthePUD; 6.Calculationoftheproposeddensityoftheprojectandthepotentialdensityunder standardzoningregulations,includingbothgrossdensityandnetdensity, accountingfordevelopableandundevelopableland.Undevelopablelandshall includeallwetlands,floodplains,sensitiveecologicalareasidentifiedinthe NaturalResourceInventory,slopesgreaterthan18%,poorsoils,andareasof concentratedwoodlands. 7.Outlineadevelopmentscheduleindicatingtheapproximatedatewhen constructionoftheproject,orstagesofthesame,canbeexpectedtobeginandbe completed(includingtheproposedphasingofconstructionofpublic improvementsandrecreationalandcommonspaceareas). 8.AConceptPUDPlanillustratingthenatureandtypeofproposeddevelopment. Ataminimum,theplanshouldshow: a.Areacalculationsforgrosslandarea b.Existingzoningdistrict(s) c.Layoutofproposedlotsandproposeduses.Denoteoutlotsplannedfor publicdedicationand/oropenspace(schools,parks,etc.) d.Areacalculationsforeachparcel e.Generallocationofwetlandsand/orwatercoursesoverthepropertyand within200feetoftheperimeterofthesubdivisionparcel f.Locationofexistingandproposedstreetswithinandimmediatelyadjacentto thesubdivisionparcel g.Proposedsidewalksandtrails h.Proposedparkingareas i.Proposedparks,commonareas,andpreservationeasements(indicatepublic vs.privateifapplicable) j.Generallocationofwoodedareasorsignificantfeatures(environmental, historical,cultural)oftheparcel k.Locationofutilitysystemsthatwillservetheproperty l.Other:Anapplicantmaysubmitanyadditionalinformationthatmayexplain theproposedPUD. (iv)PUDConceptPlanReview 1.UponreceivingacompletePUDconceptplanapplication,theCommunity DevelopmentDepartment,alongwithotherdesignatedstaff,shallreviewthe proposalandgenerateastaffreportanalyzingtheproposalagainstthe expectationsforPUDs.Thereportshallbeforwardedtotheappropriate commissions—asdeterminedbytheCommunityDevelopmentDirector. 2.CommissionsreceivingthereportshallreviewthePUDrezoningrequest,and makearecommendationtotheCityCouncilwithregardtotheplatlayout, design,density,uses,deviations,andachievedpublicvaluesoftheconceptplan; ThePlanningCommissionshallberesponsiblefortheformalcommentstothe CityCouncil.Otherstaffandcommissionreportsshallbeprovidedtothe PlanningCommissionandmadeapartofthePlanningCommission’sreport. 3.TheCouncilshallconsidertherecommendationsofthecommissionsthathave conductedareview,andprovidefeedbacktotheapplicantontheproposedpublic values,proposeddeviations,andanyotheraspectoftheapplication.The Councilshalleithermakeamotionthattheapplicant—iftheychooseto proceed—moveforwardwiththePUDpreliminaryplatandrezoningrequests,or directtheapplicanttosubmitadevelopmentapplicationusingconventional zoningdistrictstandards.TheCouncilshallmakeitsfindingwithinthetime allottedbyMinn.Stat.Section15.99,andmaytakeuptheapplicationwithout PlanningCommissionactionifthePlanningCommissionhasnotactedwithin sixty(60)daysofitsoriginalpublichearingdate.TheCityCouncil’sfindings areexplicitlynotanapprovaloftheproject,andareintendedtorepresentthe complianceoftheproposedprojectwiththePublicValuesStatement,the applicablezoningregulations,andtheComprehensivePlan. 4.AftertheCitypolicymakershavereviewedandcommentedontheConceptPUD plan,citystaffshallmeetwithanyotherresponsibleagencies,asapplicable,to exploreopportunitiesofpartnershiptoenhancethestatedpublicvalues. (c)PUDPreliminaryPlatandRezoning–DevelopmentStagePUD (i)InitiationofProceedings 1.ConcurrentapplicationsforrezoningtoPUDandaPreliminaryPlatshallbe submittedtotheCitywithinoneyearoftheCityCouncil’sfindingsonthePUD ConceptPlan.FailuretosubmitapplicationsforrezoningtoPUDanda PreliminaryPlatwithinoneyearoftheCityCouncil’sfindingswillrequirethe applicanttobegintheprocesswiththeCollaborativePUDmeeting. 2.TherequestsforrezoningtoPUDandPreliminaryPlatshallbeinitiatedby applicationofthepropertyownerorotherpersonhavingauthoritytofilean applicationpursuanttoSection2.3(B),AuthoritytoFileApplications.The DevelopmentStagePUDrequestconstitutesaseparateapplicationandshallbe subjecttonewtimelinesforthepurposesofMinn.Stat.Section15.99. (ii)Application 1.AllapplicationsforrezoningtoPUDandPreliminaryPlatshallbeinaccordance withSection2.3,CommonReviewRequirements. 2.TheapplicationforrezoningtoPUDshallbeinaccordancewithSection2.4(B), ZoningOrdinanceTextandZoningMapAmendments. 3.TheapplicationforPreliminaryPlatshallbeinaccordancewithCityCodeTitle 11,Chapter4,DataRequiredforPreliminaryandFinalPlats;andshallinclude theadditionalinformationrequirementslistedinSection2.4(P)(9)(c)(iii)below tobeconsideredcomplete(exceptasexemptedbytheCommunityDevelopment Department). 4.IfthePUDisproposedtodevelopoveratimeframeexceedingtwoyears,aPUD PhasingPlan fortheentireproject(tobecompletedinphases)maybe submitted.SubsequentPUDFinalPlanapplicationswouldonlygrantapproval foranindividualphase. (iii)SpecificPUDPreliminaryPlatSubmittalRequirements AnapplicantshallprovideaseparatePUDDevelopmentPlanclearlydelineatingthe proposeddevelopmentandallfeaturesnotconsistentwithunderlyingzoning regulations(e.g.setbackdeviations).Ataminimum,theplanshouldshow: 1.Administrativeinformation(includingidentificationofthedrawingasa “PreliminaryPUDDevelopmentPlan,”theproposednameofthesubdivision, contactinformationforthedeveloperandindividualpreparingtheplan,signature ofthesurveyorcertifyingthedocument,dateofplanpreparationorrevision,and agraphicscaleandtruenortharrow); 2.Areacalculationsforgrosslandarea,wetlandareas,wetlandbuffers,right-of- waydedications,conservationareas,andproposedpublicandprivateparks; 3.Existingzoningdistrict(s); 4.Layoutofproposedlotswithfuturelotandblocknumbers.Theperimeter boundarylineofthesubdivisionshouldbedistinguishablefromtheother propertylines.Denoteoutlotsplannedforpublicdedicationand/oropenspace (schools,parks,etc.); 5.Areacalculationsforeachparcel; 6.Proposedsetbacksoneachlot(formingthebuildingpad)andcalculated buildablearea; 7.Proposedgrosshardcoverallowanceperlot(ifapplicable); 8.Existingcontoursatintervalsoftwofeet.Contoursmustextendaminimumof 200feetbeyondtheboundaryoftheparcel(s)inquestion; 9.Delineationofwetlandsand/orwatercoursesoverthepropertyandwithin200 feetoftheperimeterofthesubdivisionparcel; 10.Delineationoftheordinaryhighwaterlevelsofallwaterbodies; 11.Grading,drainageanderosioncontrolplanpreparedbyaregisteredprofessional engineer,providingallinformationoutlinedinMonticelloZoningCode,Chapter 4,Section10(C). 12.Location,width,andnamesofexistingandproposedstreetswithinand immediatelyadjacenttothesubdivisionparcel; 13.Easementsandrights-of-waywithinoradjacenttothesubdivisionparcel(s); 14.Thelocationandorientationofproposedbuildings; 15.Coloredbuildingelevationswhichdetailthematerialsbeingused. 16.Proposedsidewalksandtrails; 17.Vehicularcirculationsystemshowinglocationanddimensionforalldriveways, parkingspaces,parkinglotaisles,serviceroads,loadingareas,firelanes, emergencyaccess,ifnecessary,publicandprivatestreets,alleys,sidewalks,bike paths,directionoftrafficflowandtrafficcontroldevices. 18.Lightinglocation,styleandmountingandlightdistributionplan. 19.Proposedparks,commonareas,andpreservationeasements(indicatepublicvs. privateifapplicable); 20.Landscapeplanpreparedbyaqualifiedprofessionalprovidingallinformation outlinedinMonticelloZoningOrdinanceSection4.1(D).includingplanting counts,sizesandspecies. 21.Locationanddetailofsignageprovidingallpertinentinformationoutlinedin MonticelloZoningOrdinanceSection2.4(K)(3)(b). 22.Location,accessandscreeningdetailoflargetrashhandlingandrecycling collectionareasincompliancewiththerequirementsofMonticelloZoning OrdinanceSection5.3(D)(31). 23.AnyotherinformationasdirectedbytheCommunityDevelopmentDepartment. (iv)PUDPreliminaryPlatandRezoningtoPUDReview 1.TheapplicationforrezoningtoPUDshallbereviewedinaccordancewith Section2.4(B),ZoningOrdinanceTextandZoningMapAmendments. 2.TheapplicationforPreliminaryPlatshallbereviewedinaccordancewithCity CodeTitle11,Chapter3,Section2,PreliminaryPlatProcedure. 3.Aspartofthereviewprocessforbothapplications,theCommunityDevelopment Departmentshallgenerateananalysisoftheproposalagainsttheexpectationsfor PUDsandthepreviouslyestablishedpublicvaluesstatementtoformulatea recommendationregardingtherezoningtotheplanningcommissionandCity Council. 4.Theplanningcommissionshallholdapublichearingandconsiderthe application’sconsistencywiththeintentandpurposeofthePUDand comprehensiveplangoals.Theplanningcommissionshallmake recommendationstotheCityCouncilonthemerit,neededchanges,and suggestedconditionsoftheproposedrezoning,preliminaryplatandPUD developmentplan. 5.InapprovingordenyingtheordinancetorezonethesubjectpropertytoPUD,the CityCouncilshallmakefindingsonthefollowing: a.ThePUDplanisconsistentwiththecity’scomprehensiveplan; b.ThePUDplanistailoredtothespecificcharacteristicsofthesiteand achievesahigherqualityofsiteplanningandgreaterpublicbenefitsthan wouldbeachievedunderconventionalprovisionsoftheordinance; c.ThePUDplanaddressesthepurposeandintentofthePUDrezoninglaidout inSection2.4(P)(1),andthepublicvaluesstatementestablishedatthe beginningoftheprocess d.ThePUDplanaddressestheexpectationsofaPUDlaidoutinSection 2.4(P)(7); e.ThePUDplanmaintainsorimprovestheefficiencyofpublicstreets,utilities, andotherpublicservices; f.ThePUDplanresultsindevelopmentcompatiblewithexistingadjacentand futureguidedlanduses; g.HowthePUDplanaddressesthepurposeandintentofthePUDrezoning laidoutinSection2.4(P)(1),andthepublicvaluesstatementestablishedat thebeginningoftheprocess. h.WhetherthePUDcanbeaccommodatedbyexistingpublicservices,suchas parks,police,fire,administration,andutilities,orthedeveloperhasprovided forthegrowthandextensionofsuchservicesasacomponentofthePUD. i.WhetherthePUDisdesignedtotakeadvantageof,andpreserve,thenatural featuresofthesubjectproperty,includingwaterways,forestedareas,natural prairie,topography,views,etc. 6.Anordinancerezoningthepropertyshallbeadoptedthatincludesaneffective datethatcoincideswiththeapprovalandrecordingoftheFinalPlatforthe property. (d)PUDFinalPlat (i)InitiationofProceedings 1.AfinalplatthatconformswiththepreliminaryplatandassociatedPUDrezoning ordinanceshallbesubmittedwithin180daysofapprovalofthepreliminaryplat approval,unlessotherwiseextendedbytheCityCouncil.Iftheapplicantfailsto submitafinalplatapplicationorextensionrequestwithinthistimeperiod,the PUDapplicationshallbeconsideredvoidandtheapplicantshallberequiredto begintheprocesswiththeCollaborativePUDmeeting. 2.TherequestforPUDFinalPlatshallbeinitiatedbyapplicationoftheproperty ownerorotherpersonhavingauthoritytofileanapplicationpursuanttoSection 2.3(B),AuthoritytoFileApplications. (ii)Application 1.AllapplicationsforPUDFinalPlatshallbeinaccordancewithSection2.3, CommonReviewRequirements. 2.TheapplicationforPUDFinalPlatshallbeinaccordancewithCityCodeTitle 11,Chapter4,DataRequiredforPreliminaryandFinalPlats. 3.Inadditiontogeneralcitycoderequirements,applicationsforaPUDFinalPlat shallalsoincludeatleasttheinformationinSection2.4(P)(9)(d)(iii)belowtobe consideredcomplete(exceptasexemptedbytheCommunityDevelopment Director). (iii)SpecificPUDFinalPlatSubmittalRequirements 1.IfaPUDMasterPlanfortheentireprojectwassubmittedandapprovedaspart ofthepreliminaryplatreview,anupdatedMasterPlanshallbesubmitted incorporatingallchangesrequiredbythepreliminaryplatapproval. 2.ThePUDDevelopmentPlanshallbeupdatedtoincorporateallchangesrequired bythepreliminaryplatandrezoningapprovals.Thisdocumentmustclearly showalldeviationsfromstandardzoningbeingapprovedaspartofthePUD. 3.TheCityshallprepare,andtheCityandapplicantshallexecute,adeveloper’s agreementwhichreferencesallPUDplans,developmentphasing,required improvements,completiondatesforimprovements,therequiredletterofcredit, allrequireddevelopmentfees,escrows,andwarranties,andanyother informationdeemednecessarybytheCity. 4.TheCityshall,uponrecordingoftheFinalPlat,publishthePUDOrdinance specifyinglanduses,densities,performancestandards,andongoinggeneral obligationsofoccupantsofthePUD.Suchordinanceshallcreateazoning districtthatisspecifictothepropertyforwhichthePUDwasapplied,andshall bedesignatedinsuchawayastobeabletomarktheofficialzoningmapto identifythePUDordinance.ThePUDordinanceshallalsodesignatethatsuch propertyistherebyrezonedtothePUDdistrictasadopted. 5.Up-to-datetitleevidenceforthesubjectpropertyinaformacceptabletotheCity shallbeprovidedaspartoftheapplicationforthePUDFinalPlat. 6.DevelopershallprovidewarrantydeedsforPropertybeingdedicatedtotheCity forallparks,outlots,etc.,freefromallliensandencumbrancesexceptas otherwisewaivedbytheCityCouncil. 7.Developershallprovidealleasementdedicationdocumentsforeasementsnot shownonthefinalplatincludingthosefortrails,ingress/egress,etc.,together withallnecessaryconsentstotheeasementbyexistingencumbrancesofthe property. (iv)PUDFinalPlatReview TheapplicationforPUDFinalPlatshallbereviewedinaccordancewithCityCode Title11,Chapter3,Section3,FinalPlatProcedure. (10)PUDAmendments ApprovedPUD’smaybeamendedfromtimetotimeasaresultofunforeseencircumstances, overlookedopportunities,orrequestsfromadeveloper.Atsuchatime,theapplicantshall makeanapplicationtothecityforaPUDamendment.Allsuchamendmentswillbe processedasoneofthefollowing: (a)AdministrativeAmendment –TheCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentmayapprove minorchangesinthelocation,placement,andheightofbuildingsifsuchchangesare requiredbyengineeringorothercircumstances,providedthechangesconformtothe reviewcriteriaappliedbythePlanningCommissionandCityCouncil,andareconsistent withallrequirementsofthePUDordinance.Undernocircumstancesshallan administrativeamendmentallowadditionalstoriestobuildings,additionallots,or changestodesignatedusesestablishedaspartofthePUD. (b)PUDAdjustment –anadjustmenttoaPUDmaybemadethroughreviewandapproval byasimplemajorityvoteoftheCityCouncilwithorwithoutreferraltothePlanning Commission.Toqualifyforthisreview,theminoradjustmentshallnot: (i)Eliminate,diminishorbedisruptivetothepreservationandprotectionofsensitive sitefeatures. (ii)Eliminate,diminishorcompromisethehighqualityofsiteplanning,design, landscapingorbuildingmaterials. (iii)Altersignificantlythelocationofbuildings,parkingareasorroads. (iv)Increaseordecreasethenumberofresidentialdwellingunitsbymorethanfive percent. (v)Increasethegrossfloorareaofnon-residentialbuildingsbymorethanthreepercent orincreasethegrossfloorareaofanyindividualbuildingbymorethanfivepercent (residentiallotsnotguidedforspecificstructuresizesareexcludedfromthis requirement). (vi)Increasethenumberofstoriesofanybuilding. (vii)Decreasetheamountofopenspaceoralteritinsuchawayastochangeitsoriginal designorintendedfunctionoruse. (viii)Createnon-compliancewithanyconditionattachedtotheapprovaloftheFinalPUD Plan. (c)PUDAmendment –anychangenotqualifyingforanadministrativeamendmentora PUDadjustmentshallrequireaPUDamendment.AnapplicationtoamendaPUDshall beadministeredinthesamemannerasthatrequiredforaninitialPUDbeginningatPUD PreliminaryPlat. (11)PUDCancellation APUDshallonlybecancelledandrevokedupontheCityCounciladoptinganordinance rescindingtheordinanceapprovingthePUD.Inanyevent,itshallnotbenecessaryforthe counciltofindthecreationofaPUDdistrictwasinerror.TheordinancerevokingthePUD shallincludeasectionrezoningthepropertytoagriculturaluse,ortheCityCouncilmay determinethatamoreappropriatebasezoningdistrictshouldbechosentofurthertheintent andobjectivesoftheComprehensivePlan. (12)Administration Ingeneral,thefollowingrulesshallapplytoallPUDs: (a)Rulesandregulations:NorequirementoutlinedinthePUDprocessshallrestricttheCity Councilfromtakingactiononanapplicationifnecessarytomeetstatemandatedtime deadlines; (b)Preconstruction:Nobuildingpermitshallbegrantedforanybuildingonlandforwhich aPUDplanisintheprocessofreview,unlesstheproposedbuildingisallowedunderthe existingzoningandwillnotimpact,influence,orinterferewiththeproposedPUDplan. (c)EffectonConveyedProperty.IntheeventanyrealpropertyintheapprovedPUD Agreementisconveyedintotal,orinpart,thebuyersthereofshallbeboundbythe provisionsoftheapprovedFinalPUDPlanconstitutingapartthereofaswellasthePUD zoningordinance;provided,however,thatnothinghereinshallbeconstruedtocreate non-conforminglots,buildingsites,buildingsorusesbyvirtueofanysuchconveyance ofalot,buildingsite,buildingorpartofthedevelopmentcreatedpursuanttoandin conformancewiththeapprovedPUD. CityCouncilAgenda:03/26/12 1 5F.ConsiderationofadoptingOrdinance#555updatingandextendingtheInterim TemporarySignOrdinance#526toApril1,2013 (AS) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: AttheMarch12th,2012meeting,theCityCouncilelectedtoextendtheinterim ordinanceallowingforrelaxationofcodespertainingtotemporarysignage. Includedwiththisconsentagendaitemisafinalversionoftheinterimordinancefor approvalandpublication.Theinterimordinancealsoincludesthreeadditionsnoted duringtheCouncilmeeting. 1.Additionofaprovisionrelatingtothemaintenanceoftemporarysignageduringthe interimterm. Thisprovisionwasrecommendedbythesmallbusinessgroupasameanstobetter regulateaprimaryconcernwithtemporarysignage.Thegroupfeltthatthe appearanceandmaintenanceofsignagewasanimportantfactorindeterminingthe overallaestheticimpactofthesetypesofsigns. 2.Aprovisionstipulatingthattheareaoftheprimarymessageboardshallbenolarger than32squarefeethasbeenincludedperCouncildiscussion. Totalsignagemaybe40squarefeettoaccommodatethesmallareacommonlyseen aboveandbelowportablesignsforcontactinformation. 3.Additionofaprovisionrelatingtotheabilityforpublicandsemi-publicinstitutions toutilizetemporarysignage. Althoughnotpartoflastyear’sinterimordinance,staffhadincludedthislanguagein thepermanenttemporarysignordinanceamendmentsproposedduringthelast meeting.Thisprovisionaddressestheissueofregulationsfortemporarysignagefor non-profitandpublicentitieslocatedinresidentialdistricts.Currently,thesefacilities (includingCity-ownedproperties)donothavetheabilitytoutilizetemporary signage.Temporarysignsareallowedincommercialandindustrialdistrictsonly. Staffbelievesthatthisprovisionshouldbeaddedtotheinterimordinanceinorderto closethenotedloopholeuntilpermanenttemporarysignordinanceamendmentsare adopted. Consistentwithlastyear’sinterimordinance,thisinterimordinancedoesnotextendto banners,flags,pennants,sandwichboardsandotherformsoftemporarysignage.This exclusionisclarifiedintheproposedinterimordinance.Bannersandsimilartypesof signagearestillsubjecttocurrentzoningregulationsrequiringa40-daylimitationand permit.Sandwichboardsarealreadyallowed365daysperyear(nopermitrequired outsidetheCCD),contingentonhoursofoperationandlocationonbusinessproperty. CityCouncilAgenda:03/26/12 2 A1.BudgetImpact:Budgetimpactislimitedtocostsforpublicationoftheinterim ordinance. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:TheCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentand DepartmentofBuildingSafetyhavealreadymettolayouttheprocessfor permittingandenforcementundertheinterimordinance. Permitteeswillbegivenacopyoftheinterimordinance,alongwithamap illustratinglocationsofrightsofwayandeasementsalongtheirstreet.In addition,theywillberemindedthattrackingofdaysusedontheirpermitformis requiredundertheinterimordinance. AstheCouncildirectedfirmenforcementofmaterials,locationanddaytracking duringtheinterimordinance,theDepartmentofBuildingSafetywillbeallocating timeeachweekforenforcementpertheinterimordinanceprovisions. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoapproveOrdinance#555updatingandextendingtheInterim TemporarySignOrdinance#526toApril1,2013. 2.MotiontodenyOrdinance#555updatingandextendingtheInterimTemporary SignOrdinance#526atthistime. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1.ThisalternativeisconsistentwithCouncilaction onMarch12th,2012. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: InterimOrdinance#555 ORDINANCENO.555 CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA ANINTERIMORDINANCEEXTENDINGANDUPDATINGORDINANCE#526 PROVIDINGTEMPORARYEXPANSIONOFTEMPORARYSIGNAGE ALLOWANCESWITHINTHECITYOFMONTICELLO THEMONTICELLOCITYCOUNCILORDAINSASFOLLOWS: WHEREAS,theCityofMonticelloshalladoptthisordinancetoallowtheCityof Monticellotimetostudyandadoptappropriatelandusecontrolsregulatingtemporarysignage; and WHEREAS,theCityofMonticelloispresentlyconductingaplanningstudyforthepurposeof consideringamendmentofofficialcontrolsfortemporarysignage;and WHEREAS,thereisaneedforastudytobeconductedsothattheCitycanreviewitslanduse zoningregulationspertainingtotemporarysignageuses;and WHEREAS,thereisaneedforaninterimordinancetobeadoptedforthepurposeofprotecting theplanningprocessandthehealth,safety,andwelfareofthecitizensoftheCityuntilsucha studyhasbeencompleted. NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVED bytheCityCounciloftheCityofMonticello, Minnesotathat: 1.PursuanttoMinn.Stat.§462,355,etseq.,theCityherebyextendsOrdinance#526and adoptsthisorderforinterimordinancetemporarilyrelaxingMonticelloZoning OrdinanceTemporarySignregulation4.5(I)(1)withintheCityofMonticello. 2.Thisordinanceshalltakeeffectandbeinfullforcefromandafteritspassageand publication.Itshallremainineffectuntiltheadoptionoftheofficialcontrols contemplatedhereinorApril1st,2013whicheverfirstoccurs. 3.Onetemporarysignperbusinessshallbeallowedbypermit. 4.Onetemporarysignshallbeallowedevery75linealfeetofstreetfrontage,onnotmore thantwopublicstreets,ontheparcelforwhichthepermithasbeenissued. 5.Thetotalnumberoftemporarysignagedaysallowedperbusinessshallbeunlimitedin number. 6.Signagedaysmustbetrackedbypermitholderforapermittobeconsideredvalid. 7.Temporarysignareashallbelimitedtoamaximumof40squarefeet.Theareaofthe primarymessageboardshallbenolargerthan32squarefeet. 8.Signsmustbeconstructedofmaterialsconsistentwithtemporarysigns(portable)suchas aluminum,acrylic,plexiglas,lexan,polycarbonate,orothercomparablematerialsand maynotbeconstructedofplywood,chipboard,corrugatedplastic,unfinishedmaterials, orothersimilarmaterials. 9.Alltemporarysignagemustbekeptingoodrepairandmaynotconstituteanuisanceas definedbyTitle7,Chapter1ofCityCode. 10.Theinterimordinancedoesnotincludearelaxationofstandardspertainingtootherforms oftemporarysignageorsandwichboards,asdefinedbyordinance. 11.Signsmustbelocatedonthepropertyonwhichthebusinessactivityislocated,withthe permissionofthepropertyowner. 12.Prohibitionofalloff-premisetemporaryandpermanentsignageshallcontinueper MonticelloZoningOrdinanceregulations4.5(D)(2),4.5(D)(9)andgeneralallowableuse regulations(5.1). 13.Signsmaynotbelocatedwithinanypubliceasementorright-of-way. 14.Governmentbuildingsandstructures,publicandquasi-publicbuildings;publicparksand recreationareas,publiceducationalinstitutionslimitedtoaccreditedelementary,middle orseniorhighschools,andreligiousinstitutionsshallbeallowedtemporarysignagein accordancewiththeprovisions(1)through(6)ofthisordinance. 15.TheCitymayenforceanyprovisionofthisordinancebymandamus,injunction,orany otherappropriatecivilremedyinanycourtofcompetentjurisdiction. ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis26thdayofMarch,2012. MONTICELLOCITYCOUNCIL _______________________________ ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator CityCouncilAgenda:03/28/12 1 5G.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2012-030supportingsubmissionof applicationforDNR2012RegionalTrailsgrantandadoptingResolution#2012-031 supportingsubmissionofapplicationforDNR2012LocalTrailsgrant (AS/BW) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: OnFebruary27th,theCityCouncilapprovedsubmissionofapplicationsforDNR2012 LocalandRegionalTrailgrantprogramsforthetrailsegmentsassociatedwiththewest CSAH75area.Thegrantapplicationseachrequirethataformalresolutionofsupportbe includedwiththeapplication.SaidresolutionsarethereforesubmittedforCouncil approval. A1.BudgetImpact:None.DNRgrantswillbecompletedbyCitystaffandmaybe submittedelectronically. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Asnotedpreviously,Citystaffispreparingthegrant applicationsandestimatesthetotalamountofstafftimeatapproximately8hours. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoapproveResolution#2012-030supportingsubmissionofapplication forDNR2012RegionalTrailsgrantandResolution#2012-031supporting submissionofapplicationforDNR2012LocalTrailsgrant. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: StaffrecommendsAlternative#1above,inaccordancewithactiontakenattheFebruary 27th CityCouncilmeeting. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Resolution#2012-030–RegionalTrailGrantApplication Resolution#2012-031–LocalTrailGrantApplication ExcerptfromCityCouncilMinutes,February27th,2012 Trailways&TrailheadMap CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTIONNO.2012-030 SUPPORTINGA2012MINNESOTADEPARTMENTOFNATURALRESOURCES LOCALTRAILCONNECTIONSGRANTAPPLICATIONFORSEGMENT3OFTHE MONTICELLOGREATRIVERTRAILWAYS&TRAILHEADSYSTEM WHEREAS,theCityofMonticellodesirestosubmitagrantapplicationforthe2012MN DepartmentofNaturalResourcesLocalTrailConnectionsProgramforthepurposeoffunding Segment3oftheMonticelloGreatRiverTrailways&Trailheadsystem;and WHEREAS,theCityofMonticellorecognizesthe25%matchrequirementfortheLocalTrail ConnectionsProgramandhassecuredthematchingfunds; NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVED thatifawardedagrantbytheMinnesotaDepartment ofNaturalResources,theCityofMonticelloagreestoacceptthegrantandmayenterintoan agreementwiththeStateofMinnesotafortheabove-referencedproject,and BEITFURTHERRESOLVED thattheCityofMonticellocertifiesthatitwillcomplywithall applicablelawsandenvironmentalrequirementsandregulationsasstatedinthegrantagreement; and BEITFURTHERRESOLVED thattheCityofMonticelloherebyassuresthatSegment3ofthe MonticelloGreatRiverTrailwaysandTrailheadSystemwillbemaintainedforaperiodofno lessthan20years;and BEITFURTHERRESOLVED thattheCityofMonticellonamesthefiscalagentforthis projectasThomasKelly,FinanceDirector,CityofMonticello,505WalnutStreet,Suite1, MonticelloMN55362. ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis26th dayofMarch,2012. CITYOFMONTICELLO _____________________________ ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: __________________________ JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator CERTIFICATION STATEOFMINNESOTA COUNTYOFWRIGHT IherebycertifythattheforegoingisatrueandcorrectcopyofResolution#2012-030 dulypassed,adoptedandapprovedbytheMonticelloCityCouncilattheirscheduledmeetingon March26,2012,andrecordedinminutesofsaidmeeting. ____________________________________ JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator NotaryPublic:_______________________________ Date:___________________________ (STAMP) CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTIONNO.2012-031 SUPPORTINGA2012MINNESOTADEPARTMENTOFNATURALRESOURCES REGIONALTRAILGRANTAPPLICATIONFORSEGMENT4ANDTHE TRAILHEADFACILITYUNDERTHEMONTICELLOGREATRIVER TRAILWAYS&TRAILHEADSYSTEM WHEREAS,theCityofMonticellodesirestosubmitagrantapplicationforthe2012MN DepartmentofNaturalResourcesRegionalTrailsProgramforthepurposeoffundingSegment4 andtheTrailheadFacilityoftheMonticelloGreatRiverTrailways&Trailheadsystem;and WHEREAS,theCityofMonticellorecognizesthe25%matchrequirementfortheRegional TrailsProgramandhassecuredthematchingfunds; NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVED thatifawardedagrantbytheMinnesotaDepartment ofNaturalResources,theCityofMonticelloagreestoacceptthegrantandmayenterintoan agreementwiththeStateofMinnesotafortheabove-referencedproject,and BEITFURTHERRESOLVED thattheCityofMonticellocertifiesthatitwillcomplywithall applicablelawsandenvironmentalrequirementsandregulationsasstatedinthegrantagreement; and BEITFURTHERRESOLVED thattheCityofMonticelloherebyassuresthatSegment4and theTrailheadFacilityoftheMonticelloGreatRiverTrailwaysandTrailheadSystemwillbe maintainedforaperiodofnolessthan20years;and BEITFURTHERRESOLVED thattheCityofMonticellonamesthefiscalagentforthis projectasThomasKelly,FinanceDirector,CityofMonticello,505WalnutStreet,Suite1, MonticelloMN55362. ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis26th dayofMarch,2012. CITYOFMONTICELLO _____________________________ ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: __________________________ JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator CERTIFICATION STATEOFMINNESOTA COUNTYOFWRIGHT IherebycertifythattheforegoingisatrueandcorrectcopyofResolution#2012-030 dulypassed,adoptedandapprovedbytheMonticelloCityCouncilattheirscheduledmeetingon March26,2012,andrecordedinminutesofsaidmeeting. ____________________________________ JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator NotaryPublic:_______________________________ Date:___________________________ (STAMP) CityCouncilAgenda:03/26/12 1 7.PublicHearing-ConsiderationofadoptingOrdinance#556amendingthe2012Fee SchedulewithadjustmentstoRight-of-WayPermitfees (BW) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: OnDecember12,2011,Counciladoptedthe2012FeeSchedule,whichincludedfeesfor theCity’sRight-ofWayPermitwhichhadbeenrevisedsubstantiallyfromthe2011fees. The2012feesadoptedbyCouncilfortheCity’sRight-ofWayPermitareattachedas Figure1 ofthesupportingdata. Thefeerevisionsweredeemednecessaryforseveralreasons.First,staffwantedthefees wewerechargingpermitapplicantstobereflectiveofthesizeoftheproject,which affectstheamountoftimestaffspendsreviewingthepermitapplicationsandinspecting theworksite.Second,wewantedthepermitfeetoaddresschangingtechnologiesrelated tothemethodsusedtoinstallundergroundutilities,whichaccountforthevastmajority ofourpermitapplications.Third,wewantedtoaddaprovisiontoallowapplicantsto extendtheircurrentpermitratherthanhavingtopullanewoneiftheydidn’tcomplete theirprojectbeforethedeadlinenotedonthepermitapplication,savingboththemand theCitytimeandmoney.Lastly,wefeltholefeeswerenecessarytoaccountforthe extratimethatstaff,bothfromtheEngineeringandPublicWorksDepartments,needto spendinspectingtherepairofholesinstreetsandboulevards,bothintermsofpublic safetyandrestoration. Inthepast,theCitysimplychargedaflatfeeforright-of-waypermits,mostrecently$50, whichdidnotfullyaccountfortheissuesnotedabove.Forexample,ifsomeonepulleda permittoconnecttoanexistingutilitylineintheboulevardtorunaservicetoaproperty theypaidthesamefeeassomeonewhopulledapermittoinstall1,000feetofconduit along,acrossorunderaCitystreet,whichmayincludeseveralpavementcuts.Thiswas neitherfairfortheapplicant,nordiditaccuratelyreflectthetimespentbystaffin reviewingthepermitapplication.Thenewfeesnowchargeabasefeeforupto100feet oftrunkutilitylineinstalled.Afterthataper-footfeeisapplied,dependingonthe methodofinstallationused.Thisisimportantbecauseifautilitylineistrenchedin,or opencut,itdisturbstheturfwhichmustthemberestoredtoasgoodaconditionorbetter thanbeforetheworkwascompleted.Thistakesadditionalstafftimetoinspecttoensure thattherestorationwascompletedsatisfactorily.However,ifautilityisboredintoplace (directionaldrilled)itdoesnotdisturbtheturfsonofurtherinspectionisneeded.As such,theper-footfeeforboringislessthanthefeefortrenching. Insettingthe2012fess,staffreviewedthefeesbeingchargedbynumerousothercitiesof varioussizesandlocationsacrossthestate,bothintermsofthevariousfeesbeing appliedandtheamountofthefees.Staffalsoestimatedouractualcostsforprocessing thepermits,inspectingthesites,andclosingthepermitsout.Whenthe2012feeswere adoptedbytheCityCouncilonDecember11,2011,staffwascomfortablethatthefees werebothfairandwarranted,andthattheutilitycompanieswouldgenerallynotobjectto thefeessincetheywerecommonlyinuseelsewhere. CityCouncilAgenda:03/26/12 2 OnMarch1st,Citystaffmetwithvariousrepresentativesfromutilitycompaniesthatpull right-of-waypermitsinMonticelloonaregularbasistoreviewanddiscusstheCity’s newright-of-waypermitfees.Ingeneral,theutilitycompanyrepresentativesunderstood ourrationalforitemizingourright-of-waypermitfeesaswedid,buttheytookexception tothevariousholefees.Theynotedthatthereisnowaytheycanestimatewithany accuracythenumberofpotholesthatwillberequireduntiltheybegintheirwork.Thisis dependentonthenumberandlocationofexistingutilities,andassuchtheyaskedthat thisitemberemovedfromthefeeschedule.Itwasthendiscussedthatthenumberofpot holesreallyshouldnotaffecttheamountofinspectiontimerequiredbyCitystaffasit wouldn’ttakemuchlongertovisitthesiteandinspectoneholethanitwouldtovisitthe sitetoinspect6potholes. Thestreetandboulevardholefeeswerethendiscussed.Allinattendanceunderstandour concernwithcuttingholesinthestreetsandsupportedafeeforsuchinstancessincethis involvedalargeramountofinspectionbyCitystaff.Asfarastheboulevardholefeewas concerned,mostunderstoodourconcernwithpublicsafetybutfeltthataseparatefeefor thisshouldnotbechargedsincethisworkwouldnotlikelyrequireaspecialinspection bytheCity.Staffisthereforeproposingtoremovetheboulevardholefeewhichhas beenfactoredintotherequiredinspectiontimeforthetrunklinebasefee,andtoretain thestreetholefeewhichisnowcalledapavementholefeesinceitcouldbeappliedto pathwaysandsidewalksalso,exceptthatthisfeenowappliestomultipleholes.The revised2012Right-ofWayPermitfeesproposedbystaffforCounciladoptionare attachedas Figure2 ofthesupportingdata. A1.BudgetImpact:ThenewrateswillaffecttheamountofrevenuetheCitywill generatefromrightofwaypermitfeesin2012. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Staffworkloadimpactswillbenegligible. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoadoptOrdinance#556amendingthe2012FeeSchedulewith adjustmentstotheRight-of-WayPermitfees. 2.MotiontodenyamendingtheFeeScheduleforRight-of-WayPermitfeesatthis time. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: StaffrecommendsapprovingAlternative#1. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Ordinance#556–showingchanges Figure1–OriginalAdopted2012Right-of-WayPermitFees Figure2–Proposed2012Right-of-WayPermitFees ORDINANCENO.556 CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA ANORDINANCEREVISINGTHE2012FEESCHEDULE WITHAMENDEDRIGHT-OF-WAYPERMITFEES THECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFMONTICELLOHEREBYORDAINS: Section1.TheFeeSchedulecategory,ENGINEERING,oftheMonticelloCityCode,Title 20shallbeamendedasfollows: Right-of-WayPermits: Right-of-WayPermitExtensionFee:$20 $17.50 HoleFee –greaterthan8inchdiameter: Street:$30firsthole $5eachholethereafter Boulevard:$20 firsthole $5eachholethereafter PotHoleFee –maximum8inchdiameter:$10firsthole $5eachholethereafter PavementHoleFee:$50 ObstructionFee:$40 Section2.ThisOrdinanceshalltakeeffectandbeinfullforcefromandafteritspassage andpublication.TheordinanceinitsentiretyshallbepostedontheCitywebsite afterpublication.CopiesofthecompleteOrdinanceareavailableonlineandat MonticelloCityHallforexaminationuponrequest. ADOPTEDANDAPPROVEDFORPUBLICATION bytheCityCounciloftheCityof Monticello,Minnesota,this26thdayofMarch,2012. CITYOFMONTICELLO ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: JeffO’NeillCityAdministrator VOTINGINFAVOR: VOTINGINOPPOSITION: CityCouncilAgenda:03/26/12 1 8.ConsiderationofadoptingaRedevelopmentPrioritiesPolicyandRelocation AssistancePolicy (MBL) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: TheEDAandCityCouncilarecurrentlyintheprocessofinitiatingredevelopment projectsidentifiedintheEmbracingDowntownPlan.Duetotheoftentimescomplex anddifficultdecisionsthataccompanyredevelopmentprojects,theEDAbelieveditwas importanttoestablishpoliciesforredevelopmentandrelocationinitiatives.Therefore theydirectedstafftodraftpoliciesthatwillhelpguidetheEDAandCityCouncilthrough redevelopmentopportunitiesandsubsequentdecisions. TheEDAreviewedandapprovedthepoliciesattheirMarch14,2012meeting.Aspartof themotionandadoption,theEDArequestedtheCityCouncilreviewandconsider adoptionofthepolicies.TheEDAdesirestocontinuetoworkinharmonywiththeCity Counciltoinitiateandcompletedesiredredevelopment/developmentprojects.Thehope isbyestablishingtheattachedpoliciestheCityCouncilandEDAwillcontinuetoclearly communicateaunitedandpositivesetofstandards.Thepoliciesactasaguideanditis recognizedthatimplementationofthepolicieswillbereviewedonacasebycasebasis.It willbeimportanttokeeptheEDAandCityCouncilincontinualcommunication. ThepoliciesestablishabaselineunderstandingthattheEDAwillfollowStateStatutes whenredevelopmentprojectsinvolverelocatingabusinessorresident.TheRelocation PolicyfurtherstatesthattheEDAwillworkingoodfaithtoretaindislocatedbusinesses orresidentswithintheCitylimits.Thispolicywillhelptocommunicatethefactthatthe needsofbusinessesaffectedbyredevelopmentwillbeaddressed. TheRedevelopmentPrioritiesPolicyoutlinesthattheCityCouncilandEDAwillreview potentialpropertypurchasestogetherbasedonthefollowingcriteria: a.Proximitytopriorityprojectareas(seeAttachmentI) b.Reasonablepurchaseprice c.Countyassessedvalue d.Recentcompletedappraisal,ifany e.Propertykeytotransportationorpublicutilityprojects f.Numberandtypeofexistingtenants g.Timelineofnewdevelopmentpotential h.Availabilityandappropriatenessofeminentdomain Thepolicyalsoestablishesasetofobjectiveswhendeterminingwhetherornottoinitiate aredevelopmentproject.Suchobjectivesinclude: a.Stabilizingandincreasingtaxbase b.Removinginfluencesthatcanorhavenegativelyaffectedthecommunity c.Rejuvenatingtheappearanceandperceptionofagivenarea d.Leveragingprivatefundingwherefeasible e.Jobscreatedand/orretained CityCouncilAgenda:03/26/12 2 Additionally,theRedevelopmentPolicyidentifiesshorttermpriorityareas,which includeBlock34andBlock31.Theexpectationwhenworkingthroughredevelopment projectsisthatbusinessowners,propertyowners,staff,andpolicyboardswillwork towardssolutionsthatarecomprehensive,creative,andinnovative.Lastly,the expectationthatprojectswillbeinitiatedbasedonmarketrealitiesandfinancial capabilities. ItshouldbenotedthatthepolicieswerereviewedandsupportedbyKennedy&Graven andWilsonDevelopment. A1.BudgetImpact:ThepolicieswereforwardedtoKennedy&GravenandWilson Developmentforreviewandcomment. A2.StaffWorkloadImpacts:StaffimpactsincludeddraftingthepoliciesforEDA andCityCouncilconsideration. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoadopttheMonticelloRelocationAssistancePolicyandtheCityof MonticelloRedevelopmentPrioritiesPolicyasproposed. 2.MotiontodenyadoptingtheMonticelloRelocationAssistancePolicyandthe CityofMonticelloRedevelopmentPrioritiesPolicy. C.RECOMMENDATION: CityStaffrecommendsAlternative#1. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: RedevelopmentPrioritiesPolicy RelocationAssistancePolicy CITYOFMONTICELLOREDEVELOPMENTPRIORITIESPOLICY TheMonticelloEconomicDevelopmentAuthority(EDA)iscommittedtoredevelopmentasan importantandnecessarytooltomaintainthehealthofthecommunityandencourageeconomic development.Forthepurposeofthisdocument,theterm “redevelopment”carriesabroaddefinition including,butnotlimitedto,activitiesassociatedwithneighborhoodpreservationandrevitalization, commercialandindustrialstabilizationandgrowth,redevelopmentandrevitalizationofdowntown Monticello.TheEDAwillserveasacatalystforredevelopmentbasedonthefollowingpolicies. 1.ThecommunityneedsforredevelopmentwillalwayssurpasstheabilityoftheEDAand/or otherfundingentitiestofullyfinanceand/orbeapartnerinsuchendeavors.Inorderto maximizetheeffectofEDAinvolvement,redevelopmentprioritieshavebeenestablishedas illustratedinAttachmentI.Thisprioritylistandtheredevelopmentpolicieswillbereviewed andupdatedbytheEDAonanannualbasis. 2.TheTIFManagementPlan,availableandapplicablegrants,andotherapplicablefunding opportunitieswillbeutilizedasaguidetoevaluateavailabilityoffinancialresources. 3.TheEDArecognizesthatredevelopmentscenariosareextremelycomplexandeachplan willdemandauniquesetofsolutions. 4.Creationofmajorredevelopmentplansshallincludeparticipationbythecommunity includingbutnotlimitedto,residents,businessandpropertyowners,affectedgovernment agenciesandotherstakeholders. 5.Solutionsforredevelopmentshallbecomprehensiveinnatureandassumemarketrealities. 6.ApprovedplansshallbepositivelypromotedandendorsedbytheCityCouncil,CityBoards andstaff. 7.TheEDAwillcontinuetobeinnovativeindevelopingcreativesolutionsandresourcesto meetitsredevelopmentneeds.TheEDAwillcontinuetoseekoutsidefundingsourcesto supplementtheEDA’sfinancialresources. 8.WhenseekingEDAandCityCouncilapprovalforacquisitionofproperty,thefollowing factorswillbetakenintoaccount: a.Proximitytopriorityprojectareas(seeAttachmentI) b.Reasonablepurchaseprice c.Countyassessedvalue d.Recentcompletedappraisal,ifany e.Propertykeytotransportationorpublicutilityprojects f.Numberandtypeofexistingtenants g.Timelineofnewdevelopmentpotential h.Availabilityandappropriatenessofeminentdomain 9.ReviewingappropriatenessofpurchasingpropertybasedonthefactorsoutlinedinNumber8 willassistinreducingland-bankingbytheCity. 10.Theendobjectivesofredevelopmenteffortsinclude: a.Stabilizingandincreasingtaxbase b.Removinginfluencesthatcanorhavenegativelyaffectedthecommunity c.Rejuvenatingtheappearanceandperceptionofagivenarea d.Leveragingprivatefundingwherefeasible e.Jobscreatedand/orretained 11.Redevelopmentplansareviewedasinherentlyflexibleanditisrecognizedthatthe componentpartsofaplanmaychangefromtimetotimeinorderforittobeimplemented withinthemarketplace. ***************************************************************************** ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis26th dayofMarch,2012. CITYOFMONTICELLO ____________________________________ ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator AttachmentI–RedevelopmentPriorities PrimaryActivities: ImplementationoftheEmbracingDowntownPlan a.Block34 b.Block31 c.Otherareasasdeemedappropriateanddrivenbyprivateinvestment Redevelopmentandrevitalizationofblightedresidentialproperties PotentialFutureActivities: Block35 Block33 Designenhancementstomajorintersectionsandstreetcorridors MONTICELLORELOCATIONASSISTANCEPOLICY TheMonticelloEconomicDevelopmentAuthority(EDA)iscommittedtoactivelypromotingnew developmentandredevelopmentwithintheCityofMonticello.Fromtimetotime,development activitiesmayleadtodisplacementoftenants,homeowners,propertyowners,and/orbusinesses.The EDArecognizesthehardshipthiscreatesandiscommittedtominimizingtheimpactof displacement.Ifdisplacementoccurs,theEDAwilluseitsbesteffortstominimizethishardship guidedbythispolicy. 1.MinnesotaStatutes,Section117.52to117.56(StateRelocationAct)shallgovernthe circumstancesinwhichapersonorbusinessiseligibleforrelocationbenefitsinconnection withacquisition,development,orredevelopmentprojectsinvolvingtheCityofMonticello. 2.SubjecttothetermsoftheStateRelocationACTtheEDAwillprovideadvisoryservicesto anydisplacedpersonorbusinessreasonableandnecessarytominimizethehardshipof displacement. 3.TheEDAwillprovideallservicesreasonableandnecessarytoensuretherelocationprocess doesnotresultindifferentorseparatetreatmentbecauseofrace,color,religion,sex,or nationalorigin. 4.TheEDAwillworkingoodfaithwithdisplacedbusinessestofacilitateretentionofsuch businessesintheCityofMonticello. 5.Replacementhousingpaymentsmustbeusedtoleaseorpurchasedecent,safe,andsanitary housing. 6.Forthepurposeofthispolicy,apersonisclassifiedas“low-income”bytheU.S.Department ofHousingandUrbanDevelopment’sAnnualSurveyofIncomeLimitsforthePublic HousingandSection8Programs.Thissurveyisupdatedannuallyandavailablethroughthe FederalHighwayAdministration’swebsiteat http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/realestate/ua/ualic.htm. ***************************************************************************** ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis26th dayofMarch,2012. CITYOFMONTICELLO ____________________________________ ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator City CouncilAgenda:03/26/12 1 9.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2012-029acceptingFeasibilityReportand callingforaPublicHearingfor2012RuralRoadImprovements,CityProjectNo. 12C001 (BW) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: OnFebruary13,2012,CouncilauthorizedthepreparationoftheattachedFeasibility ReportforCityProjectNo.12C001,whichproposestorehabilitateand/orimprovethe pavementsectionsonthreeruralroadsegmentslocatedinthesoutheastquadrantofthe Citytotalingapproximately12,400feetinlength,or2.35miles.Thethreeruralroad segmentsinclude: EdmonsonAvenue-ChelseaRoadtosouthCitylimits(approx.6,000linearfeet) FallonAvenue-SchoolBoulevardtopowerlinesbetweenKleinFarmsandHunters Crossing(approx.2,800linearfeet) FenningAvenue-SchoolBoulevardto85th StreetNE(approx.3,600feet). Mapsshowingthescopeofthethreeprojectareasareincludedas Figures1,2and3 in thesupportingdata(FeasibilityStudy). PavementSectionEvaluations Thepavementsectionsofthesethreeruralroadsegmentshavedeterioratedtovarying degreesovertheyearsandthereforeneedtobeimprovedtovaryingdegreestoextend theirusefullives.Overall,theratingsindicatethattheseruralroadsegmentsshould receivesometypeofpavementrehabilitationimprovementtoextendtheirusefullives. Staffrecentlyratedthepavementsectionsforthesethreeruralroadsegmentsand assignedaPavementConditionIndex(PCI)toeachsegmentusingourPavement ManagementProgram(PMP),whichismanagedin-housebystafffromtheEngineering andStreetDepartments.PCI’sareanumericalindexbetween0and100thatindicatethe conditionofapavementbasedonthevariouspavementdistressesrecordedduringvisual observations.APCIvalueof100representsapavementinbrandnewcondition,whilea PCIvalueof0representsapavementsectionthathasfallenintototaldisrepairrequiring acompletereconstruction. ThePMPevaluationprocessinvolvesdividingthepavementsurfaceintosections.The type,extentandseverityofthevariouspavementdistressesnotedwithineachsectionare thenrecorded.Numeroustypesofpavementdistressesmayexistwithinapavement sectionincluding,butnotlimitedto,alligatorcracking,blockcracking,longitudinal cracking,transversecracking,rutting,raveling,shoving,potholesandpatches.Eachtype ofdistressobservedreceivesaratingoflow,mediumorhighseveritybasedontheextent ofthedistressnoted. OncestaffgathersthefielddataitisthenprocessedusingCarteGraphPMPsoftware, whichcalculatesanaveragePCIratingforeachsegmentanalyzed.ThisPCIvalueis usedbystafftodeterminethemostcost-effectivepavementrehabilitationmethodfor City CouncilAgenda:03/26/12 2 eachroadsegment.Thethreeruralroadsproposedforimprovementsin2012allhave PCIratingsbetween6.34and64.31asshownbelowin Table1.Figure4 ofthe supportingdataalsoincludesthesePCIratings,alongwithotherinformationonthe existingpavementincludingtheyearitwasoriginallyconstructedandroutine maintenanceinformation. TABLE1 ProposedImprovements–Edmonson,FallonandFenningAvenues StreetNameFromTo2011PCI RehabilitationMethod Proposed EdmonsonAveChelseaRdDundasRd32.5Reclaim/UrbanReconstruct EdmonsonAveDundasRdFarmsteadDr14.6Reclaim/UrbanReconstruct EdmonsonAveFarmsteadDrSchoolBlvd6.34Reclaim/UrbanReconstruct EdmonsonAveSchoolBlvd89th St18.23Reclaim/UrbanReconstruct EdmonsonAve89th St87th St44.34Reclaim/UrbanReconstruct EdmonsonAve87th StCityLimits64.31Reclaim/UrbanReconstruct FallonAveSchoolBlvdStarlingDr25.3Reclaim/MillandOverlay FallonAveStarlingDrFallonDr24.73Reclaim/MillandOverlay FallonAveFallonDr85th St35.95Reclaim/MillandOverlay FallonAve85th StFarmsteadAve26.1Reclaim/MillandOverlay FallonAveFarmsteadAve87th St43.85Reclaim/MillandOverlay FallonAve87th St90-degreeturn78.62Reclaim/MillandOverlay FenningAveSchoolBlvdSpiritHillsRd62.36MillandOverlay FenningAveSpiritHillsRd86th St46.66MillandOverlay FenningAve86th St85th St60.83MillandOverlay ThePavementConditionIndex(PCI),whichisbasedonthephysicalconditionofthe roadsisobtainedfromafieldinspectionofeverysquareyardofroadsurfacemeasuring boththequantityandthetype(severity)ofdistressesinthepavement.Someexamplesof typicalpavementdistressesthatarefoundintheseroadsincludetransverseand longitudinalcracking,blockcracking,andalligatorcracking.Representativepicturesof thesetypesofpavementdistressesareshownasfollows. City CouncilAgenda:03/26/12 3 LongitudinalcrackingBlockCrackingAlligatorCracking ThecalculationofthePCIvalueforanindividualroadtakesintoaccountthetotalareaof distressesencounteredandtheseverityofthedistresses. PCIRangeRoadCharacteristics Maintenance Method AdditionalItems OftenRepaired 70-100 Lowtomediumseveritypotholes, frostcracking,mediumseverity transversecracking,aggregate polishing,lowseverityraveling RoutineMaintenance/ CrackSeal/Sealcoat Spotpatching,gatevalve adjustments 36-69 Lowtomediumseverity longitudinalandtransverse cracking,lowandmoderate severityedgeandcurbcracking andspalling,lowtomedium severityblockcracking,medium severityraveling Patch/Repair/ Resurface/Overlay Raisemanholecastings,adjust gatevalves,repairorreplace crackedorspalledcurb,repair orreplacecatchbasincastings 0-35 Mediumtohighseverity longitudinalandtransverse cracking,mediumtohighseverity reflectivecracking,alligator cracking,mediumtohighseverity potholes,highseverityedgeand curbcrackingandspalling, rutting,excessiveskinpatching, highseverityraveling,mediumto highseverityfrostheaving ReclaimandRecycle/ Reconstruct/Upgrade Replaceorinstallsanitary sewer,replaceorinstallstorm sewer,replaceorinstallwater main,replaceutilitycastings, adjustroadgradeand alignment,replaceorinstallcurb andgutter Eachofthesemaintenancestrategieshasitsownlifecycle,aswellasitspartin extendingthelifeoftheoverallpavementsection. RoadswithPCIratingsfrom0to35indicatethepresenceofseveraldistressesinthe pavementanditisdifficulttoquantifytheamountofdistressesgiventhatthereareso many.Asaresult,comparingtheratingsinthisrange,forexamplewhetheritisa2ora 20,doesnotresultinasignificantchangeinthetypeofmaintenancemethodforthese roadsormaketheroadwiththehigherPCIratinginbetterconditionthantheroadwith thelowerPCIrating.ItisthereforerecommendedthatroadswithaPCIbelow35be City CouncilAgenda:03/26/12 4 reconstructedforthesereasons.EdmonsonAvenueandFallonAvenueareboth exhibitingsignificantpavementdistressesinthisrange. Fortheruralroadsegmentsidentifiedforimprovementsin2012,thisreportexploresthe useofthefollowingthreerehabilitationmethodsasidentifiedbelowin Table1. Pavementmillandoverlay -Thistreatmentmethodisproposedtobeusedon FenningAvenue,andpossiblyonFallonAvenue.Itinvolvesmilling1½“offthe topoftheexistingbituminouspavement,thenoverlayingthemilledpavement witha1½”matofnewasphalt.Thistreatmentwilltypicallyextendtheuseful lifeofthepavementby10to15years,andtheexistingcrackswilltypicallybegin toreflectthroughthenewpavementsurfacewithin2to5years,atwhichpointa sealcoatingisusuallyapplied. Pavementreclamation -ThistreatmentmethodcouldbeusedonEdmonson Avenueand/orFallonAvenue.Itinvolvesreclaimingtheexistingpavement section,includingtheasphaltpavementandaportionoftheaggregatebase section,byusingamillandthenmixingthemilledmaterialstogetherbefore reapplyingthemovertheremainingaggregatebaseasanewrecycledaggregate basecourse,whichthenreceivesanew4”asphaltpavementsurface.Theresultis athicker,strongerpavementsection,withthesurfaceoftheroadbeingseveral incheshigherthanitoriginallywas. Urbanreconstruction -ThistreatmentmethodcouldbeusedonEdmonson Avenueifanurbansectionispreferredoveraruralsectionatthistime.This wouldinvolveremovingtheexistingpavementsectionandsomeoftheexisting subgradetolowertheroadwayabout1foot,thenconstructinganewpavement sectionwith6”aggregatebaseand4”bituminouspavement,alongwithcurband gutterandstormsewer.Itshouldbenotedthattheexistingasphaltpavement couldbereclaimedandreappliedinplaceofnewaggregatebaseclass5asa potentialcostsavingmethod.Thiscouldbebidasanalternatebidtoseewhatthe costsavingswouldbe,ifany. TomWood,ResearchProjectSupervisorwiththeMn/DOTOfficeofMaterialsandRoad Research,assistedCitystaffinevaluatingthepavementconditionsofthethreeroad segmentsaddressedinthisFeasibilityReport.Basedonhisobservations,Mr.Wood recommendedthattheCitycompletepavementreclamationprojectsonbothEdmonson AvenueandFallonAvenue,andthatweeitherreclaimandrepaveFenningAvenueor completea“TexasUnderseal”onit,whichisanewtreatmentMn/DOTrecentlytriedon asegmentofHighway101.However,Mn/DOTisstillevaluatingtheresultsofthat treatmentsostaffdoesnotrecommendtryingthistreatmentatthistime. WSBcompletedatotaloffifteen(15)pavementcoringsandfourteen(14)soilboringson March16th alongthethreeruralroadsegmentstodeterminetheexistingpavement sectionconditionsandthicknesses,andtosamplethesubgradematerialsatvarious locationsalongeachroadsegment.Eight(8)coringsandboringsweretakenalong City CouncilAgenda:03/26/12 5 EdmonsonAvenue,four(4)coringsandthree(3)boringsweretakenalongFallon Avenue,andanotherthree(3)coringsandboringsweretakenalongFenningAvenue. Thisinformationisimportantwhendeterminingpavementrehabilitationtreatment optionsasthereclaimmachineneedstocutdeepenoughtocoolthecuttingteethinthe upperinchortwooftheaggregatebase,andthecompositionofthesubgradesoilsis crucialtoensuringpropersubgradestability.Itshouldbenotedthatnoneofthecorings, whichwereall3-feetindepth,encounteredgroundwater.Assuch,thisreportassumes thatdewateringshouldnotbeanissueduringconstructionandthatsumppumpsshould besufficientforanydewateringthatmaybeneeded. Thesoilboringsgenerallyindicatedthattheexistingroadsubgradesoilsconsistofsilty andclayeysandsoils,andarethereforesuitablesubgradesoilsforroadconstructionand forthesupportandbeddingofutilities.However,whensiltyandclayeysandsoilsareat orabovetheiroptimummoisturecontentstheywillbeunstableandwillrequirefarming anddrying,oralternativelyasubcutcouldbecompletedwiththesoilbeingreplacedwith compactedselectgranularmaterial. OnEdmonsonAvenue,thepavementcoresindicatethisisacandidateforpavement reclamation.Thepavementislosingitsintegrityandshowingsignsofstriping.The pavementappearstobetoothintocompleteamillandoverlayandcouldbeadversely impactedbyconstructionoperations.Basedontheamountofcrackingpresentonthe roadway,ifamillandoverlayorjustabituminousoverlaywascompleted,thecrackswill resurfaceandwillnotprovideanaestheticallypleasingsurface.Thecrackswouldneedtobe maintainedovertimeaswell,whichcouldbemorecostlythanifreclamationwascompleted. Ifjustanoverlayiscompleted,additionalcostsforshouldering,matchinginto driveways/crosswouldneedtobetakenintoaccountaswell. FallonAvenuehasalargeamountofcrackingandotherdistressesinthepavementwhich indicateitisacandidateforpavementreclamation.Thepavementcoresindicatethatthe pavementappearstobeintactingeneral;howevertherearesomesignsofstripingstartingto show.A1½"millandoverlaycouldbecompletedontheroadwayifthefuturetrunksanitary sewerweretobeextendedwithintheroadwayinthenext10years,asthiswouldbealess expensivealternative.However,theexistingcrackswillresurfaceandtheresultsofa reclamationandcontinuedmaintenancewouldprovideamoreaestheticallypleasingand longerlastingsurface. OnFenningAvenue,thepavementcoresindicatethisisacandidatefora1½"milland overlay.Thepavementissoundandhasnoapparentsignsofstriping.Thereappearstobe anadequatedepthofpavementfortheamountandtypeoftrafficcurrentlyontheroadway. Abituminousoverlayonly,withnomilling,couldbeconsidered,howevertherewouldbe wouldbeadditionalcostsforshouldering,matchingintodriveways/crossstreets,etc. WSBandAssociates PavementCoringandBoringsForensicReport isattachedin AppendixD. TherecommendationsofbothTomWoodandWSBhavebeenincorporatedintothe FeasibilityReportindeterminingthebeststrategiesforrehabilitatingthepavement sectionsofthethreeroadsegments. City CouncilAgenda:03/26/12 6 EdmonsonAvenueProposedImprovements EdmonsonAvenueiscurrentlyaruralroadwithpavementwidthsvaryingbetween22 and24feetbetweenChelseaRoadandthesouthCitylimits.Existing(2008)traffic countsrangefrom1,150to2,250ADT.Projected(2030)ADT’sare4,600. Thefeasibilityreportexaminestwoalternativepavementrehabilitationoptionsfor EdmonsonAvenue. Option#1 Leaveasaruralroadatapproximatelythesameelevationbyreclaimingtheexisting bituminouspavementsectionbygrindingitupandplacingitovertheexistingaggregate base.Anew4”bituminouspavementsurfacewouldthenbeplacedoverthereclaimed materialafteritiscompacted.Existingdrainageculvertswouldbecleanedandreused whereverpractical.Insummary: Reclaimandrepavebituminouspavementsectionandshoulders Construct11’lanesw/1’aggregateshoulders=24’totalwidth Someminorgradingofin-slopeswillberequired Minorturfrestorationwillberequired AddtwoINTERSECTIONAHEADsignsforDundasRoad Option#2 Reconstructtheroadasanurbansectionbyreclaimingtheexistingbituminouspavement section,lowertheroadbedapproximately1foot,andconstructinga44-footwideurban roadwaywithcurbandgutterandstormsewer.Thereclaimedmaterialwouldbeusedas thenewbaseforthenewpavementsurfacetoreducecosts.Insummary: Reconstructas44-footwideurbansectionw/C&Gandstormsewer Constructtwo14’lanesoutsidew/16’centertwo-wayturnlaneinside Fillingofditcheswillberequired Turfrestorationwillberequired AddtwoINTERSECTIONAHEADsignsforDundasRoad Option#1wouldbetheleastexpensiveandwouldminimizeconstructiontimeand impactstoarearesidentsandbusinessesduringconstruction. Option#2wouldbemuchmorecostlyandwouldincreasetheconstructiontimeand impactstoarearesidentsandbusinessesduringconstruction.However,constructingan urbansectionwasultimatelythegoalforthissegmentofEdmonsonAvenue,andcould beconsideredbyCounciliftheyfeelthetimeisrighttospendthemoneytocomplete theseimprovements. Parkingwillneedtoberestrictedalongbothsidesoftheroad,foreitheroptionproposed, inordertoconformtoMn/DOTStateAidstandardswhichwillallowtheCitytousestate aidfundstopayforaportionoftheimprovements. City CouncilAgenda:03/26/12 7 FallonAvenueProposedImprovements FallonAvenueiscurrentlyaruralroadwithapavementwidthof22feetsouthofSchool Boulevard.Existing(2008)trafficcountsarelessthan1,000ADT.Projected(2030) ADT’sareunknownatthistime. Thisfeasibilityreportexaminestwoalternativepavementrehabilitationoptionsfor FallonAvenue. Option#1 LeaveFallonAvenueasaruralroadatapproximatelythesameelevationbyreclaiming theexistingbituminouspavementsectionbygrindingitupandplacingitoverthe existingaggregatebase.Anew4”bituminouspavementsurfacewouldthenbeplaced overthereclaimedmaterial.Existingdrainageculvertswouldbecleanedandreused wheneverpractical.Insummary: Reclaimandrepavebituminouspavementsection Construct11’lanesw/1’aggregateshoulders=24’totalwidth Exploreextendingin-slopeintowetlandeastofFallonAvenue Someminorgradingofin-slopeswillberequired Minorturfrestorationwillberequired Option#2 LeaveFallonAvenueasaruralroadatapproximatelythesameelevationbymilling1½“ oftheexistingpavementsurfaceofftheroadandoverlayingthemilledsurfacewitha new1½“matofbituminouspavement.Thistreatmenttypicallyextendstheusefullifeof thepavementby10yearsormore,buttheexistingcrackswilllikelybegintoreflect throughthenewpavementsurfacewithin1to3years.Existingdrainageculvertswould becleanedandreusedwhereverpractical.Insummary: Perform1½”millandoverlayexistingbituminouspavement Construct11’lanesw/1’aggregateshoulders=24’totalwidth Exploreextendingin-slopeintowetlandeastofFallonAvenue Minorturfrestorationwillberequired Option#1wouldbemorecostlyandwouldincreasetheconstructiontimeandimpactsto arearesidentsandbusinessesduringconstruction,itwouldbethebestoptionifCouncil thinksthatlargescaleresidentialdevelopmentwillnotreturnformanyyearstocome, therebyavoidingtheneedtoinstallthedeepsanitaryinterceptorsewerunderFallon Avenue. Option#2 couldbeconsideredifitisanticipatedthatthefuturetrunksanitarysewerneeded tobeextendedundertheroadwayinthenext10years,inwhichcasethiswouldbealess expensiveoption.However,theexistingcrackswillresurfaceandtheresultsofa reclamationandcontinuedmaintenancewouldprovideamoreaestheticallypleasingand longerlastingsurface. City CouncilAgenda:03/26/12 8 ParkingiscurrentlyrestrictedalongtheeastsideofFallonAvenueacrossfromPioneer Parktopreventchildrenfromrunningintotheroadbetweencars,whichhasbeenan issueduringpeakparkuses.Thisrestrictionisproposedtobecontinued. FenningAvenueProposedImprovements FenningAvenueiscurrentlyaruralroadwithapavementwidthof22feetsouthof SchoolBoulevard.Theprojected(2030)trafficvolumeis4,900ADT. FenningAvenueisproposedtoberehabilitatedbymilling1½“oftheexistingpavement surfaceofftheroadandoverlayingthemilledsurfacewithanew1½“matofbituminous pavement,afterwhich1-footgravelshoulderswillbeconstructedalongeachside.This treatmentshouldextendtheusefullifeofthepavementby10to15years,andthe existingcrackswilllikelybegintoreflectthroughthenewpavementsurfacewithin2to5 years.Existingdrainageculvertswouldbecleanedandreusedwheneverpractical.In summary: Perform1½”millandoverlayofexistingbituminouspavement Construct10’lanesw/1’aggregateshoulders=22’totalwidth Someminorgradingofin-slopeswillberequired Minorturfrestorationwillberequired ParkingisnotcurrentlyrestrictedalongthissegmentofFenningAvenue,andnoparking restrictionsareproposedatthistime. OtherConsiderations Nopublicinputmeetingswereheldwithpropertyownersalongtheseruralroad segmentstodiscusstheproposedimprovements.However,ifCouncilordersthePublic Hearing,staffwillthenmeetwiththeownersoftheundevelopednon-residential propertiesalongEdmonsonAvenuetodiscusstheirpreferenceforwhetherEdmonson Avenueshouldbereconstructedasaruraloranurbanroadatthistime. ItshouldbenotedthatwhilepreparingthisReportaresidentoftheGoldenEagleVillas Estatesrequestedthatanoff-roadpedestrianpathwaybeconstructedalongEdmonson AvenuebetweenSchoolBoulevardandChelseaRoad.Theresidentsaidthispathway wasneededtoallowhertoaccessthebusinessesalongCedarStreetnorthofDundas Roadusingherelectricchair.Shesaidherchairrunsoutofelectricityifsheusesthe SchoolBoulevardandTH25pathwaystoaccessthebusinesses,andthatsheisnot comfortableusingtheroad.Thishasnotbeenthefirstrequestforapathwayalong EdmonsonAvenue,andgiventheexistinghigh-speedsandtrafficvolumesalongthis corridor,itwouldmakesensetoconstructthispathwaysegmentatsometime.OnMarch 22nd theParksCommissionconsideredthisrequestandvotedunanimouslytodefer constructionofthepathwayuntilthepropertieswestofEdmonsonAvenuedevelop.As such,thispathwayisnotproposedtobeconstructedwiththe2012RuralRoad Improvements. City CouncilAgenda:03/26/12 9 Funding Thetotalestimatedprojectcostsforcompletingtheworkdefinedhereinforeach alternativeisasfollows.Eachalternativeincludesa1½”millandoverlayonFenning Avenue. AlternativeA=$701,840(Edmonsonreclaim/repave,Fallonmill/overlay) AlternativeB=$782,227(Edmonsonreclaim/repave,Fallonreclaim/repave) AlternativeC=$2,027,906(Edmonsonurbanreconstruct,Fallonmill/overlay) AlternativeD=$2,108,294(Edmonsonurbanreconstruct,Fallonreclaim/repave) Allestimatedcostsinclude10%contingencyand22%indirectcosts.Thisworkwas previouslyidentifiedintheCity’s5-yearCapitalImprovementPlan,whichwillneedto beupdatedbasedonthefindingsoftheReportandsubsequentCouncilaction(s).In addition,the2012budgetincluded$500,000forcompletingimprovementstoseveral ruralroadsegments. Thisprojectisproposedtobefundedusingacombinationofstreetreconstructionfunds, state-aidfunds,utilitytrunkfunds,Citycontributions,andspecialassessmentsto benefittingproperties.Tobeconsistentwithpastpractice,anyassessmentsappliedwill bebasedonthecurrentuseofthepropertyatthetimetheimprovementsaremade. However,iftheuseofthepropertychangesinthefuture,theassessmentwouldbere- evaluatedatthetimebasedona20-yearpavementlife,notincludingadditionalinterest costs. Single-familyresidentialpropertyownersareproposedtobeassessedforroad improvementsattherateof$4,000perlothavingdirectaccesstoanyoftherehabilitated roads.Thisassessmentratereflectsnoincreaseoverthe2011StreetReconstruction projectassessmentrates. Non-residentiallotsareproposedtobeassessedforroadimprovementsatarateof $40.50perfrontfoot. UponadoptingtheMonticelloOrderlyAnnexationAgreement(OAA)inMayof2005, theCityassumedallresponsibilityformaintainingandimprovingall“lineroads”, definedwithintheOAAasanyroadwhosecenterlineactsastheboundarylinebetween theCityandtheTownship.NofundingisthereforebeingrequestedfromtheTownship fortheproposedimprovements.However,itisproposedthatapublichearingnoticeon theprojectbesenttobenefittingtownshippropertiestoprovidethelatitudetolevy assessmentsagainstthesepropertiesatsuchtimethatannexationoccurs.Ifannexationof abenefittingtownshippropertyoccurs,itislikelytohappenatthetimetheproperty ownerseekstodevelopit.Underthisscenario,theCitywouldhavetheopportunityto incorporatethepaymentoftheassessmentintoafuturedevelopmentagreement.This appliestopropertiesalongFallonandFenningAvenues. City CouncilAgenda:03/26/12 10 A1.BudgetImpact:TheestimatedprojectcostsidentifiedintheFeasibilityReport, whichincludea10%constructioncontingencyand22%indirectcostsforlegal, engineering,administrative,andfinancingitems,areasfollows: $664,635–AlternativeA $728,950–AlternativeB $2,027,905–AlternativeC $2,092,220–AlternativeD Duetotheexistinglowbondratesstaffrecommendsusingbondstofundthe project.Bondpaymentswouldthenbemadeusingtheappropriatefunds. AsCouncilisaware,thebiddingenvironmentforstreetimprovementprojectshas beenveryfavorablerecentlyduetotheeconomywithbidpricescominginat 10%-20%lessthansimilarprojectsconstructedseveralyearsago.All indicationsarethatthisfavorablebiddingenvironmentwillcontinuethisyear whichwilllikelyresultinsignificantsavingsfortheCityifwemoveaheadwith thisprojectin2012. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:StafffromtheEngineering,PublicWorksandFinance Departmentswouldbeimpactedbythisprojecttovaryingdegrees,bothduring thedesignandconstructionphases.ItshouldbenotedthatEngineering Departmentstaffwouldberesponsibleforprovidingfull-timeconstruction inspection. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.MotiontoadoptResolutionNo.2012-029acceptingtheFeasibilityReportand approvingAlternativeA,andcallingforaPublicHearingforCityProjectNo. 12C001onApril9,2012. 2.MotiontoadoptResolutionNo.2012-029acceptingtheFeasibilityReportand approvingAlternativeB,andcallingforaPublicHearingforCityProjectNo. 12C001onApril9,2012. 3.MotiontoadoptResolutionNo.2012-029acceptingtheFeasibilityReportand approvingAlternativeC,andcallingforaPublicHearingforCityProjectNo. 12C001onApril9,2012. 4.MotiontoadoptResolutionNo.2012-029acceptingtheFeasibilityReportand approvingAlternativeD,andcallingforaPublicHearingforCityProjectNo. 12C001onApril9,2012. 5.MotiontoadoptResolutionNo.2012-029acceptingtheFeasibilityReportwith modificationsasdirectedbyCouncilandcallingforaPublicHearingforCity ProjectNo.12C001onApril9,2012. City CouncilAgenda:03/26/12 11 6.MotiontodenyadoptingResolutionNo.2012-029atthistime. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsapprovingAlternative#1or#2sincedelayingthePublicHearing willjeopardizeprojectcompletionin2012. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Resolution#2012-029 FeasibilityReportforCityProjectNo.12C001 CITYOFMONTICELLO WRIGHTCOUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTIONNO.2012-029 ACCEPTINGFEASIBILITYREPORTANDCALLINGFORPUBLICHEARING FOR2012RURALROADIMPROVEMENTS, CITYPROJECTNO.12C001 WHEREAS,pursuanttoaresolutionoftheCounciladoptedFebruary13,2012,aFeasibility ReporthasbeenpreparedbytheCityEngineerwithreferencetoproposedimprovementsto EdmonsonAvenuefromChelseaRoadtothesouthCitylimits,FallonAvenuefromSchool BoulevardtothepowerlinesbetweenKleinFarmsandHuntersCrossing,andFenningAvenuefrom SchoolBoulevardto85th StreetNE,includingtherehabilitationand/orreconstructionofstreets, curbandgutter,andpublicutilitiesasneeded,andotherappurtenantwork;and, WHEREAS,thereportswerereceivedbytheCityCouncilonMarch26,2012;and, WHEREAS,thereportsprovideinformationregardingwhethertheproposedprojectis necessary,cost-effectiveandfeasible; NOWTHEREFORE,BEITHEREBYRESOLVEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILOF MONTICELLO,MINNESOTA: 1.TheCouncilwillconsidertheproposedimprovementsforsaidstreetsinaccordancewith theFeasibilityReportsandtheassessmentofabuttingpropertiesforalloraportionofthe costoftheimprovementspursuanttoMinnesotaStatutes,Chapter429atanestimated totalcostoftheimprovementsof$728,950(AlternativeB). 2.Apublichearingshallbeheldonsuchproposedimprovementsonthe9th dayofApril, 2012intheCouncilChambersofCityHallat7p.m.andtheClerkshallgivemailedand publishednoticeofsuchhearingandimprovementsasrequiredbylaw. ADOPTEDBY theMonticelloCityCouncilthis26th dayofMarch,2012. CITYOFMONTICELLO __________________________________ ClintHerbst,Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________________ JeffO’Neill,CityAdministrator CityCouncilAgenda:3/26/12 1 10.Considerationofaddingpathwayimprovementsforthreesegmentsto2012Rural RoadImprovements,CityProjectNo.12C001 (BW) A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND: StaffisrequestingCouncilauthorizationtoaddpathwayrehabilitationimprovementsfor threepathwaysegmentstothe2012RuralRoadImprovements,CityProjectNo.12C001. Thethreepathwaysegmentsproposedtobeaddedtotheruralroadimprovements include: Segment1-JasonAvenue,OakviewCourttoOakRidgeCircle Segment2-BriarOaksEstates,OakviewLanetoMeadowLane Segment3-HawthornePlaceNorthtoShadyOakCircle Thethreepathwaysegmentsareshownin Figure1,attachedassupportingdata. Thepavementsegmentsofthethreepathwaysegmentshavedeterioratedtovarying degrees.Twoofthesegmentswillrequiretotalreconstructiontorestoretheirusefullife. Thethirdsegmentrequiresrepairstoacross-culvertwhichhasbuckledthepathwayand isthereforepresentingsafetyissuesforpathwayusers,aswellasseveralspotfixesusing amasticmaterialtofeatherthepathwayuptoleveloutsomelocalizedpavementheaving causedbytreeroots. TomWoodwithMn/DOTreviewedthethreepathwaysegmentswhilehewashereto evaluatethepavementsegmentsforthe2012RuralRoadImprovements.His recommendation,whichstaffconcurswith,istocompleteapavementreclamation projectonpathwaysegments1and2.SimilartothemethodsproposedforEdmonson AvenueandFallonAvenue,thisinvolvesreclaimingtheexistingpathwaypavement section,includingtheasphaltpavementandasmallamountofaggregatebase,then mixingthereclaimed/milledmaterialstogetherbeforereapplyingthemoverthe remainingbaseasanewrecycledaggregatebasecourse,whichisthencompactedbefore receiving2½”ofnewasphaltpavementsurfacing. Theestimatedcostforthepathwayimprovementsidentifiedherein,includingallthree segments,isabout$49,000.Thisincludes10%contingencycostsand22%indirectcosts forsomeassistancefromWSBtoprepareplansandspecifications. ItshouldbenotedthatWSBalsocompletedonepavementcoring/soilboringinpathway segment1whiletheywerecompletingthecoringsontheruralroadstodeterminewhat thesubgradeconsistedofunderthepathways,whichwereallconstructedatroughlythe sametimeandthereforeshouldhavereceivedsimilarsubgradetreatments. TheParksDepartmenthas$50,000initsbudgetfortheseimprovements. CityCouncilAgenda:3/26/12 2 Itisbeingproposedtoaddthisworktothe2012RuralRoadImprovementstotrytoget thebestbidpricesduetoeconomiesofscalesincethesamecontractorcancomplete improvementstoboththeruralroadsandthepathwaysusingthesameequipment. ItshouldbenotedthattheParksDepartmentisaskingtocontractthisworkoutasthey plantocompleteasignificantamountofworkin–housethissummerandassuchcan’t takethisworkon;plustheydon’thavethenecessaryequipmenttocompletethe pavementreclaimwork. Aswasnotedinthepreviousagendaitem,theCityhasbenefittedfromthecompetitive biddingmarketoverthelastseveralyearsandprojectsbidin2012shouldagainreceive competitivebids.WhenCouncilhaschosentotakeadvantageoftheselowbidpricesit hasbenefittedtheCity’sbudgets. A1.BudgetImpact:Asnotedabove,thepreliminarycostestimateforconstructing improvementsonall3pathwaysegmentsidentifiedhereinisabout$49,000.The 2012ParksDepartmentbudgetincludes$50,000forthiswork. A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:StafffromtheEngineeringandPublicWorks Departmentswillspendabout20hoursassistingWSBwithpreparationofplans andspecifications,andwouldberesponsibleforinspectingconstructionofthe improvements. B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS: 1.Motiontoapprovetheadditionofimprovementstothreepathwaysegmentstothe 2012RuralRoadImprovements,CityProjectNo.12C001. 2.Motiontodenyaddingthepathwaysegmentsatthistime. C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION: CitystaffrecommendsapprovingAlternative#1. D.SUPPORTINGDATA: Figure1–ProposedPathwayImprovements(12C001)