City Council Agenda Packet 12-14-2015AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING – MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, December 14, 2015 – 6:30 p.m.
Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center
Mayor: Brian Stumpf
Council Members: Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart, Tom Perrault, Glen Posusta
1. General Business
A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance
B. Approval of Meeting Minutes
Special Meeting Minutes from November 23, 2015
Regular Meeting Minutes from November 23, 2015
C. Consideration of Adding Items to the Agenda
D. Citizen Comments
E. Public Service Announcements/Updates
Holiday Hours
F. Council Liaison Updates
EDA (TP, LH)
Planning Commission (CG)
BCOL (GP)
Parks Commission
FiberNet Advisory Board (BS)
G. Department Updates
Special Meeting/Workshop Review (Mayor)
City Administrator (O’Neill)
2. Consent Agenda
A. Consideration to approve payment of bills
B. Consideration to approve new hires and departures for City departments
SPECIAL MEETING
Academy Room
4:45 p.m. City Administrator Evaluation
5:45 p.m. Public Works Director and Building Inspector Discussion
C. Consideration to approve the sale/disposal of surplus city property
D. Consideration to approve setting a special City Council meeting on December 28
for approval of bills
E. Consideration to approve the 2016 Schedule of Regular Council and Commission
meetings
F. Consideration to approve City Facility Business Hours for 2016
G. Consideration to approve Resolution 2015-087 approving a donation from
Schyma Pickles and Preserves in the amount of $100 for the Farmer’s Market
advertising and entertainment
H. Consideration to approve a pawn broker license for 2016 for David Corbin dba
Monticello Pawn, Gun and Bargain Center at 1219 South Highway 25
I. Consideration to approve an amendment to a Conditional Use Permit for a
Planned Unit Development for the Monticello Big Lake Community Hospital
District Campus (CentraCare Health Monticello) for the continued use of an
accessory heliport. Applicant: CentraCare Health System
J. Consideration to approve the Second Amendment to Development Contract for
AMAX Addition
K. Consideration to call for a public hearing by the Planning Commission on January
5, 2016 regarding amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance as related to
Massage Therapy and other Personal Services, and to direct staff to prepare
ordinances related to Massage Therapy Licensing
L. Consideration to approve a license agreement for storage at 100 Broadway East
for CSAH 75/TH25 intersection improvements
M. Consideration to adopt Resolution #2015-088 accepting improvements and
authorizing final payment to Municipal Builders Inc. for the sludge dewatering
facility, City Project No. 12C003
N. Consideration to approve Resolution #2015-089 declaring the official intent of the
City of Monticello to reimburse certain expenditures from the proceeds of bonds
to be issued by the City for the extension of 95th Street
O. Consideration to approve a Joint Powers Agreement/Highway 25 Coalition
2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion
3. Public Hearings
A. Public Hearing - Consideration to adopt Resolution #2015-090 establishing the
final Tax Levy for 2016
4. Regular Agenda
A. Consideration to adopt Ordinance No. amending the City Fee Schedule for 2016
and adopting Summary Ordinance No. for publication
B. Consideration to adopt Resolution #2015-091 approving the 2016 City budget
C. Consideration to approve Resolution #2015-092 accepting Feasibility Report and
calling for a Public Hearing for 2016 Street Reconstruction Improvements, City
Project No. 15C001
D. Consideration to accept Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for FiberNet
management
E. Consideration to approve a City match of $355,000 for a 2016 Phase X
acquisition at the Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park/YMCA Camp Manitou
5. Added Items
6. Adjournment
.
AGENDA
SPECIALWORKSHOPMEETING–MONTICELLOCITYCOUNCIL
Monday,December14,2015–4:45p.m.
AcademyRoom
Mayor:BrianStumpf
CouncilMembers:CharlotteGabler,LloydHilgart,TomPerrault,GlenPosusta
Others:JeffO’Neill,AngelaSchumann,WayneOberg,TracyErgen,JohnRued,
OtherDepartmentHeads
1.CalltoOrder
2.(4:45p.m.)CityAdministratorReview
3.(5:45p.m.)PublicWorksDirectorDiscussion
4.(6:00p.m.)BuildingInspectorDiscussion
4.Adjournment
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
1
2.Considerationtoapprovehiringafull-timePublicWorksDirector.
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
CityCouncilisaskedtoapprovehiringafull-timePublicWorksDirector.Sincethe
resignationoftheformerPublicWorksDirectorinSeptember2013theresponsibilities
havebeendispersedbetweentheSuperintendentswiththeFinanceDirectorassuming
responsibilityforoveralloperations.Whilethisarrangementhasworkedduetothe
strongcapabilitiesofstaffinvolved,itisnotidealforthelongterm.
ThePersonnelCommitteereviewedvariousoptionswhichareallidentifiedbelowas
alternativeactions.Conversationsrelatingtothedecisionrevolvedaroundthefollowing:
PublicWorksDirector:Whenistherighttimetoreplacethepositionandwhatcaliberof
candidateswillweattract?IsthetimerighttohireaPublicWorksDirectorasan
importantstepinadvanceofprojectedstaffretirements?ThePersonnelCommittee
believesthatitisimportanttohiresoonerversuslatersothenewPublicWorksDirector
cangainthebenefitofworkingwiththeSuperintendentsnearingretirement.
Engineer/PublicWorksDirector:Willthepositionbestretchedtoothinandthepotential
needtohireaCoordinatororAssistantCityEngineertoassisttheposition?Inreviewing
thisoption,thePersonnelCommitteebelievesthatanEngineer/PublicWorksDirector
wouldbestretchedtoothintobeeffective.Inaddition,thereislikelytobesome
difficultyinfindinganindividualwiththeskillnecessarytofulfilldualrollswithinthe
currentcitypaystructure.Inaddition,thecurrentarrangementwithWSBisworkingand
providesaneconomicalandeffectivealternativeforobtainingengineeringservices.
FinanceDirectorOverseeingOperations:TheFinanceDirectorhasdoneagoodjobof
handlingtheadditionalresponsibilitieswhileoperatingtheFinanceDepartment.
Significantdollarshavebeensavedduetohisextraeffort.Itispossibletocontinuewith
thisarrangementbutforeverydayhiringaPublicWorksDirectorisdelayedbecauseof
ourabilitytooperateunderaninterimarrangement,that’sonelessdayavailablefora
futurePublicWorksDirectortoworkwithourexperiencedSuperintendentsnearing
retirement.Also,theFinanceDirectorwouldthenbeavailabletoworkonandorlead
otherimportantprojectsthatarelikelytospinoutofCityCouncilgoalsetting.
A1.BudgetImpact:Thisisabudgetedpositionfor2016.Theestimatedcostofsalary
andbenefitsforthePublicWorksDirectorpositionis$120,775.
ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.Motiontoapprovehiringafull-timePublicWorksDirector
2.Motiontoapprovehiringafull-timeEngineer/PublicWorksDirector
3.MotiontoapprovecontinuationoftheFinanceDirectoroverseeingthePublic
Worksoperations.
4.Motiontoapproveother.
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
2
B.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
ThePersonnelCommitteerecommendsAlternative#1toapprovehiringafull-time
PublicWorksDirector.Informulatingarecommendation,thePersonnelCommittee
gatheredfeedbackfromstaffwhichincludedtheSuperintendents,FinanceDirectorand
CityEngineer.Therecommendationsweremixed.Therewassupportforalloptions
listedabove.Takingintoconsiderationallfeedback,thePersonnelCommitteefeelsthat
withthenearingretirementsoflong-timepublicworkssuperintendentsit’simportantto
haveadesignatedPublicWorksDirectorinplacetooverseethesuccessionandprovide
leadershiptothedepartment.HiringaPublicWorksDirectorwillopenuptimeforthe
FinanceDirectortoworkonupcomingFinance/Administrativeprojectsinadditionto
continuingtofulfillFinanceDirectorresponsibilities.
C.SUPPORTINGDATA:
•2016SalaryEstimates
2016 Salary Estimates
Position Grade 2016 Salary (Step 8)Benefits and Taxes Total
Public Works Director 19 91,859$ 28,916$ $120,775
Engineer/PW Director 20 95,944$ 29,535$ $125,479
Finance Director 21 100,029$ 30,154$ 130,183$
Finance Director/PW Director 22 104,114$ 30,773$ $134,887
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/2015
1
3.Considerationofapprovingafulltimebuildinginspectorposition.
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
CityCouncilisaskedtoconsiderapprovingtheadditionofafulltimebuildinginspector.
DuringthebudgetdevelopmentprocesstheCouncilandthePersonnelCommittee
reviewedthebuildingdepartment’sdutiesandresponsibilities;currentandanticipated
revenuesandexpenses,andworkload.Informationwasalsoprovidedregarding
additionaldutiesandresponsibilitiesassociatedwithfirecodeplanreview;associated
firecodeinspections;firesprinklerplanreviewandassociatedinspections,andreserved
projectsdelegationforStateprojects.Otherspecialtyworkincludeschangeofuseor
occupancyreviewsandcoordinatedinspectionswiththeMNDepartmentofHealthfor
commercialkitchenfacilities(restaurants,etc.).
Otherworkloadactivitiesnotrelatedtoconstructioncodesincluderentallicensingand
inspections;zoningreviews,inspections,andenforcement.Additionally,ordinance
relatedactivitiessuchasblight,nuisance,andcomplaintinspectionsarecompleted.Most
inspectionsrequirefollow-upthatinvolvesadditionalstafftime.Departmentrevenueis
anticipatedtobestableenoughtosupportanadditionalpositionfortheforeseeable
future.
A1.BudgetImpact:The2016budgetincludesafulltimepositionat40hoursper
week.Thispositionissustainablethroughdepartmentrevenue.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Increasedstaffhoursinthebuildingdepartmentwill
allowstaffmoretimetocompletethoroughplanreviews;provideafaster
turnaroundtimeforcustomers,andsufficienttimeforinspections.See
attachmentsforstaffworkload.
ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.Motiontoapprovetheadditionofafulltimebuildinginspector.
2.Motiontodenytheadditionofafulltimebuildinginspector.
B.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
ThePersonnelCommitteeandstaffrecommendAlternative#1approvingtheadditionof
afulltimebuildinginspector.
C.SUPPORTINGDATA:
•TotalNumberofPermits
•BuildingValuationData
•TotalCodeRelatedInspections2010–2015
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/2015
2
•CodeRelatedPlanReview,Inspection,andValuationCorrelation
•OverviewofthetotalworkloadfortheDepartment
•DepartmentofBuildingSafetyWorkloadDistribution(6000hrs.)
•Yearlyincreaseincoderelatedinspectionssince2010(1st yearwith3employees)
879
607 632 649 658
720 744
750 projected
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 YTD
Total Permits Issued
Total Permits Issued Projected
Building Valuation
$0.00
$5,000,000.00
$10,000,000.00
$15,000,000.00
$20,000,000.00
$25,000,000.00
$30,000,000.00
$35,000,000.00
COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL SINGLE FAMILY MISC. (Public Facility, Multi-
Family, and Institutional)
TOTAL VALUATION
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 w/IRET 2016 2016 w/IRET
$30,000,000
PROJECTION IS
WITH IRET = 2
YEAR PROJECT
$20,000,000
PROJECTION IS
WITHOUT THE
IRET PROJECT.
SHOWS NO
SUBSTANTIAL
GROWTH
1224
1305
1565
1897
2255
2790
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 YTD
Total Building Inspections per Year
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
$16,000
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Building Inspections & Plan Review thru July 2015 (pre-IRET)
Building Insp Plan Review $
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Inspections & Plan Review Current (includes IRET)
Building Insp Plan Review $
Work Load Items
PLAN REVIEW:
Commercial & Industrial
Signs
Residential
a. Basement
b. Decks
c. Sheds
d. Additions
e. Driveways
BUILDING INSPECTIONS
Same as above
BUILDING ADMINISTRATION:
Schedule inspections
Process permits
Enter inspections in Permit Works
Customer inquires
Work Load Items
PLANNING & ZONING:
Meetings
Questions & answers
Review ordinance & research
RENTAL INSPECTIONS:
Inspections
Re-inspections
RENTAL ADMINISTRATION
Send out letters
Process applications
E-file applications
Enter application and inspections in excel spread sheet
E-file inspection notices
Issue licenses
Work Load Items
MEETINGS:
Dept. Head & Agenda Meeting
Site review
Building Dept. Meeting
Planning & Zoning
Contractor / Homeowner
EDUCATION:
Annual School –January
Spring Seminar
Fall Seminar
NIMS Training (National Incident Management System)
Work Load Items
BLIGHT INSPECTIONS:
Grass & Weeds
Unlicensed & Inoperable Vehicles
Debris
Prohibited Storage
Property Maintenance
Storm damage
Foreclosures
BLIGHT ADMINISTRATION:
Issue & mail notice
Look up owner information
Give a follow up date / put into tickler file
Enter into excel
E-file pictures
Enter follow up into excel
Send off to City Attorney or Sheriff Dept if necessary
Fill out paperwork and contact lawn mowing company
Work Load Items
CIVIL DEFENSE:
REPS (Radiological Emergency Preparedness
NIMS Training (National Incident Management System)
Portable Radio Test
CUSTOMER SERVICE AND COMMUNICATIONS:
Phone Calls
Citizen Service request
Over-the-counter information (Code & Ordinance)
Pull surveys (homeowners –contractors –other
departments)
Update handouts –review
Green Sheet Updates
Council Agendas
Misc Inspections (trees, erosion, Community Dev. Request,
Economic Dev. Request, Conservation Easement, etc.)
Managing Projects
Follow up on 2008 & 2009 permits (make sure they get final
inspections)
Building Admin
9%
Plan Review
12%
Rental Inspection
6%
Rental Admin
5%
Meetings
12%
Planning & Zoning
2%Continuing Education
2%Civil Defense
2%
Public Nuisance
Inspection
4%
Public Nuisance Admin
4%
Customer Service &
Communications
3%
Building Inspection
39%
Department of Building Safety Workload Distribution
CityCouncilSpecialMeetingMinutes–November23,2015 Page1|
2
MINUTES
SPECIALMEETING–MONTICELLOCITYCOUNCIL
Monday,November23,2015–5:00p.m.
AcademyRoom
CityHall-MonticelloCommunityCenter
Present:BrianStumpf,CharlotteGabler,LloydHilgart,TomPerrault
Absent:GlenPosusta
Others:JeffO’Neill,Citystaff:RachelLeonard,TomPawelk,WayneOberg,andAngela
Schumann
ParkCommissionMembers:LarryNolanandNancyMcCaffrey
1.CalltoOrder
MayorBrianStumpfcalledthespecialmeetingtoorderat4:00p.m.intheMississippi
Room.
2.ReviewofBertramChainofLakesMasterPlan
AngelaSchumann,CommunityDevelopmentDirector,introducedtheitemandWSB
ConsultantsStevenFossandJasonAmbergwerepresenttopresentthemasterplan.
WXBpresentedinformationreceivedfromanAthleticNeedsAssessmentwhich
concludedthatcurrentcapacitydoesnotmeetdemandneedsofthearea.Includedinthe
discussionwastheSchoolDistrict’sproposedfootballfield/trackandafootballfield.
Theconstructionofthisfacilitywilldisplacefourmulti-useathleticfieldsand1multi-
useballfieldinMonticello.Theresultwillbeanetlossoftwomulti-useathleticfields
andonemulti-purposeballfield.Alsomentionedwasthepotentialdecommissioningof
theXcelFieldswhichwillresultinalossofamulti-purposefieldcurrentlyusedbyadult
softball,youthbaseball,andyouthfootball.Itwasalsonotedthatthecurrent
activity/sport(s)withthehighestdemandaresoccerandlacrosse.
WSBthenpresentedtheMasterPlanlayout.TheytookdirectionfromtheCityCouncil
workshoponOctober12,2015andeliminatedthepedestrianbridgeandexplored
alternativeparkinglotconfigurations.Theypresentedthreeoptions.Thefirstoption
preservedthemorecurvilinearparkingandhadamore‘parklike’atmosphere;thesecond
hadabalancebetweencurvilinearandstraight;andthethirdoptionhadamore
‘industrial’parkingconfiguration.TheCityCouncildiscussedtheoptions.Charlotte
GablercommentedthatshepreferredOption1becausesheprefersthemore‘parklike’
atmosphere.BrianStumpfconcurredbutalsowasinfavorofOption2.WSB
commentedthattheCityCouncilcandeterminewhichlayoutouttheypreferatalater
date.
TheCityCouncilwasthenaskedwhattheirprioritywasintermsofthebuild-outof
fields.LloydHilgartcommentedthataprioritywouldbewhateverisneededthemost.
WSBnotedthattheareasofgreatestneedaresoccer,lacrosse,andfootball.
CityCouncilSpecialMeetingMinutes–November23,2015 Page2|
2
Thenextstepsintheprocessinclude:openhouseonmasterplan;adoptmasterplan,
finalizefeasibilitystudy;construct1st phase(pergrantfunding);andseekadditional
fundinganddevelopsite.
3.2016BudgetDiscussion
WayneOberg,FinanceDirector,presentedadraftbudgetresolutionanddraftfee
scheduletotheCityCouncilforinformationalpurposes.Hepresentedtheresolutionand
madereferencetoSection3–TransfersandSection4–CapitalEquipmentand
ImprovementAcquisition.HenotedSection3becausetheCityCouncilwillbevoting
onthatitemattheregularmeetingfollowingthisspecialmeeting.Healsoclarifiedthat
becausetheCityCouncilpreviouslyapprovedanincreaseforPaidOn-CallFirefighters
from$10/hr.to$12/hr.itbeaddedtotheresolution.
CharlotteGablerquestionedwhyreserveswerenotapartoftheresolutionwhentheyare
beingusedtomaketheexpensesandrevenuesbalance.WayneObergsaidreservesare
nottypicallyintheresolutionbutcouldbeaddediftheCityCouncildesires.
ThebudgetandtaxlevywillbebroughtforwardforapprovalattheDecember14,2015
CityCouncilmeeting.
4.Adjournment
Byconsensusthemeetingwasadjourned.
Recorder:JenniferSchreiber_________
Approved:
Attest:________________________
CityAdministrator
CityCouncilMinutes–November23,2015 Page1|7
REGULARMEETING–MONTICELLOCITYCOUNCIL
Monday,November23,2015–6:30p.m.
MississippiRoom,MonticelloCommunityCenter
Present:BrianStumpf,CharlotteGabler,LloydHilgart,andTomPerrault
Absent:GlenPosusta
1.GeneralBusiness
A.CalltoOrder&PledgeofAllegiance
MayorBrianStumpfcalledthemeetingtoorderat6:30p.m.withaquorum
present.Thepledgeofallegiancewasrecited.
B.ApprovalofMeetingMinutes
•SpecialMeetingMinutesfromNovember9,2015
CharlotteGablermovedapprovaloftheSpecialMeetingMinutesof
November9,2015aspresented.LloydHilgartsecondedthemotion.
Motioncarriedunanimously.
•RegularMeetingMinutesfromNovember9,2015
LloydHilgartmovedapprovaloftheRegularMeetingMinutesof
November9,2015asrevised.TomPerraultsecondedthemotion.
Motioncarriedunanimously.
C.ConsiderationofAddingItemstotheAgenda
•BrianStumpfaddeddiscussiononFriendshipIslandandpayincreasesfor
part-timeminoremployeesattheMonticelloCommunityCenter.
D.CitizenComments
•None
E.PublicServiceAnnouncements
•RachelLeonard,CommunicationsCoordinator,providedanupdateon
businesshoursforThanksgiving.
•RachelLeonardnoteaSantaEventwhichwillbeheldonDecember5
from9–11a.m.atEastviewElementarySchool.
F.CouncilLiaisonUpdates
•FiberNetAdvisoryBoard–BrianStumpfremarkedthattheboard
discussedrecoupingcostsregardingvideoservice.
CityCouncilMinutes–November23,2015 Page2|7
•EDA–LloydHilgartcommentedthattherewascontinueddiscussionon
theEDA’sworkplan.Inaddition,theydiscussednegotiationsona
specificproperty.
•TransportationAdvisoryCommittee –BrianStumpfgaveabrief
synopsisonthefollowingitemsthatwerediscussedattheTACmeeting:
-FallonAvenueOverpass–stillwaitingonSt.Henrys;
-RebidschedulefortheHighway25/Broadwayproject;
-TheHighway25CorridorCoalitionisworkingontheJoint
PowersAgreement;and
-InterchangeStudy.
LloydHilgartaddedthattheyalsodiscussedHighway25southandthe
extensionof95th Street.
•MCCAdvisory –BrianStumpfmentionedthatthegroupdiscussedapay
increaseforthepart-timeemployees.
•PersonnelCommittee–BrianStumpfnotedthattheCommitteereviewed
thefollowingitems:
-PaidTimeOff(PTO);
-ApplicationsforEDAManager;
-TwoqualifiedapplicantsfortheWaterDepartment;
-DeliberationonagraduateEngineerpositionversusaPublic
WorksDirector;
-BuildingInspectorposition;
-AnnualReviewoftheWSBEngineeronDecember17,2015.
•Other
-BrianStumpfnotedthatheattendedtheBertramChainof
Lakes(BCOL)meetingthemorningofNovember23.The
groupconsideredtheseitems:on-sitenon-intoxicatingliquor
sales;extendinghours;roadaccess;2016isabondingyear;
andirrigation.
G.DepartmentUpdates
•Workshops–BrianStumpfstatedthattheCityCouncilWorkshopwas
heldtodiscuss1)BCOLMasterPlan;and2)City’s2016Budget.
•DepartmentUpdates
-AngelaSchumannpresentedanopportunityfortheCitytopartner
withlocalgroupsandthepublicintheNationalGeographic’s
MississippiRiverGeotourismProject.Sheprovidedinformationon
theprogram.
•CityAdministratorJeffO’Neillprovidedthefollowingupdates:
1.TheHighway25CoalitionisworkingonaJointPowersAgreement
anditwillbeonthenextCityCouncilagenda.
2.TheMayor’sChristmasdinnerwillbeDecember16at6p.m.atthe
CommunityCenterandallCityCouncilmembersareinvited.
CityCouncilMinutes–November23,2015 Page3|7
2.ConsentAgenda
TomPerraultmovedtoapprovetheConsentAgendaexcludingitemsAandE.
CharlotteGablersecondedthemotion.Motioncarriedunanimously.
A.Considerationofapprovingthepaymentofbills.Recommendation:ITEM
WASREMOVEDFROMTHECONSENTAGENDA.
B.Considerationofapprovingnewhires/departures.Recommendation:Approved
thenewhiresforMCCandthedeparturesforParks,MCC,Streetsand
Building.
C.Considerationofapprovingthesale/disposalofsurpluscityproperty.
Recommendation:Approvedthesaleofaplowfor$1,500.
D.Considerationtoapproveanapplicationforatemporarycharitablegambling
permitforaraffletobeconductedbytheSwanRiverPTOforMarch29,2016.
Recommendation:Approvedtheapplicationforacharitablegambling
permitforaraffletobeconductedbytheSwanRiverPTOattheMonticello
CommunityCenteronMarch19,2016.
E.Considerationtoapprove2015OperatingTransfers.Recommendation:ITEM
WASREMOVEDFROMTHECONSENTAGENDA.
F.ConsiderationtoapproveOrdinanceNo.627forAmendmenttotheMonticello
ZoningOrdinanceChapter2,Section4(O),asrelatedtoPlannedUnit
Developments,Chapter4,Section13asrelatedtoco-locationfacilitiesfor
wirelessantennaandChapter8,Section4fordefinitions.Recommendation:
ApprovedOrdinanceNo.627andsummaryOrdinanceNo.627A(for
publication).
G.ConsiderationtoapproveaSiteSketchforproposedVerizonWirelesscellular
antennaeinstallationatSchoolBoulevard/JeffersonCommonsWaterTower.
Recommendation:MovedapprovalofsitesketchSSv.4withshelteroption
forlandlordapprovalpurposesfortheproposedVerizonWirelesscellular
antennaeinstallationatSchoolBoulevard/JeffersonCommonsWaterTower,
recognizingthatVerizonWirelessanditsconsultantswillberequiredto
submitandfollowallrequiredfederal,state,andlocalpermittingprocesses,
andsubjecttotheadditionaldecisionsandapprovalsoftheCityaspartof
thoseprocesses.
H.ConsiderationofamendingFiberNetBusinessOfficeHoursofoperationon
ChristmasEve.Recommendation:ApprovedamendingFiberNetbusiness
officehoursofoperationonChristmasEve.
CityCouncilMinutes–November23,2015 Page4|7
2A.Considerationofitemsremovedfromtheconsentagendafordiscussion.
2A.Considerationtoapprovethepaymentofbills.
LloydHilgartpulledtheitemandquestionedacheckthatwaswrittentoJoanne
Johnson.JeffO’NeillcommentedthattheCityisthefiscalagentforthe
BroadbandAlliancegroupandcollectsallthefundsandthenissuespaymentto
Ms.Johnson.
LloydHilgartmovedtoapprovethebillandpurchasecardregistersfora
totalamountof$1,190,512.99.CharlotteGablersecondedthemotion.
Motioncarriedunanimously.
2E.Considerationtoapprove2015OperatingTransfers.
TomPerraultpulledtheitemandnotedthathewasnotinfavorofitem(h)Park
Dedication.
LloydHilgartmovedapprovaloftheproposed2015operatingtransfersas
listed.BrianStumpsecondedthemotion.Motioncarried3-1;TomPerrault
votedagainstforreasonlistedabove.
3.PublicHearings
None.
4.RegularAgenda
A.ConsiderationtoapproveaPaidTimeOff(PTO)Policyandtransitionplanfor
Citystaff.
TracyErgen,HumanResourcesDirector,presentedabriefoverviewofthe
policy.ShenotedacoupleofchangesthatweremadeattherequestoftheCity
Council.Thesewere:1)Additionaldaysofftoawardlongevity;and2)50%
payoutofsicktimetoallemployeesintoahealthsavingsaccountatthetimeof
implementation.
BrianStumpfinvitedcityemployeestocomment.TomPawelk,Park
Superintendent,expressedhisconcernthattheadditionaldaysoffshouldbegiven
aftertwentyyearsofserviceinsteadoftwenty-fiveyearsofservice.His
reasoningwasbecausetherearemanyyearswhenthereisnoincrease.Wayne
Obergrespondedthatthissystemisfairandwouldlikeittostayaspresented.
EmployeesDerekWipperandBrianRousselowalsocommentedonthepolicy.
Theyexpressedgeneralconcernsbutthoughtthepolicywasfair.TracyErgen
respondedthatthePTOpolicydidnotapplytotheseemployeesbecausetheyare
membersoftheunionanddonotqualifyforPTOatthistime.
CityCouncilMinutes–November23,2015 Page5|7
CharlotteGablernotedthatshewouldliketorevisitthepolicyafter
implementation.BrianStumpfrespondedthatitwillberevisitedintwoyears.
TracyErgencommentedthatthepolicycanbereviewedatanytime.
CharlotteGablermovedapprovalofthepaidtimeoff(PTO)policyand
transitionplan.LloydHilgartsecondedthemotion.Motioncarried
unanimously.
B.ConsiderationtoapproveResolution2015-086authorizingpreparationofa
FeasibilityReportfortheextensionof95th StreetbetweenGillardAvenueand
BroadwayStreet.
ChuckRickart,WSB,presentedanoverviewtotheCityCouncil.Hebeganwith
abriefhistoryoftheprojectandnotedthat95th Streetwaspreviouslyidentified
withtheI-94twinbridgereplacementprojectin2008.Itwasintendedasa
connection(fromSunsetPonds)whenfuturedevelopmenttookplace.Itwas
nevermeanttobeacul-de-sac.Onepossiblereasonisthattheflowoftraffic
didn’tcallforanextensionatthattime.Duetodevelopment,theincreasedtraffic
volumesgeneratedalongGillardAvenuewarrantevaluationandassessmentof
theneedtoextend95th StreettoBroadwayStreetasanalternateroutetoGillard
Avenue.Mr.Rickartnotedthatthisitemmayalsobesurfacingbecauseofafatal
caraccidentinthearea.BrianStumpf,however,disagreedandrespondedthat
thishasbeenapossibleprojectfortheCity,evenbeforetheaccident.
TheCityofMonticello/WSBiscurrentlyworkingwithMnDOTintermsofthe
right-of-wayacquisitionandsometypeofscreeningornoisewalls.TheCityis
responsiblefornoisescreeningunlessI-94expandstothreelanes,thentheState
wouldberesponsible.
TheCouncilhadsomequestionsinregardtotheFeasibilityStudy.Charlotte
GablerquestionedwhethertheCountywascontributingtothestudy.Mr.Rickart
respondedthattheCountyhadnotbeenapproachedtocontribute.Thiscouldbea
possibilityforfutureneeds.TheCityCouncilalsoquestioneddifferentwaysto
expandtheroadway.TomPerraultquestionedwhetherthestudywilltellwhat
landisavailableandhowmuch.Mr.Rickartrespondedthatthiswillbeincluded
inthestudy.
TheCityCouncildiscussedthecostofthestudy.LloydHilgartcommentedthat
$50,000seemshighunlesstheCityisconfidentthattheywanttodotheproject.
BrianStumpfrespondedthattheCitywouldnotbeatthispointofpreparinga
FeasibilityStudyiftheyweren’tinfavoroftheproject.
GrantLanka,9597HillTrailLane,addressedtheCityCouncilinregardtothe
escalationofinterstatenoisesinceheboughthishome.Hefeelsthatthereisa
needforasoundbarrier.WhenMnDOTworkedinthisareatheyremovedalot
CityCouncilMinutes–November23,2015 Page6|7
oftreesthathadoriginallydrownedoutsomeofthenoise.Inadditiontothe
sound,manyvehiclesgooffoftheroadinthisarea.TheCityCouncildiscussed
theissueandpossibleoptions.
CharlotteGablerexpressedconcernoverthecostandrequestedthatWSBkeep
costsunderbudget.Shewonderedwhethertheycouldproceedpiecebypiece,
andstopthestudyifissuesstarttocomeup.ChuckRickartcommentedthatthey
willmovecautiouslywiththestudyandoperateefficiently.
LloydHilgartmovedapprovalofOption1–toadoptResolution2015-086
authorizingpreparationofaFeasibilityReportandpreliminarydesign
alignmentfortheextensionof95th StreetbetweenGillardAvenueand
BroadwayStreet.TomPerraultsecondedthemotion.Motioncarried
unanimously.
C.ConsiderationtoapproveaRequestforQualificationsforFiberNetManagement
formandauthorizepublication.
RachelLeonard,CommunicationsCoordinator,presentedabriefhistoryonthe
developmentoftheRFQandthepurposeofthedocument.Thenextstepwill
dependonthenumberofresponses.Ifthreeormorequalifiedcandidatesemerge,
itislikelythataRequestforProposal(RFP)processwillbeimplemented.Ifone
ortwoqualifiedcandidatesareinterested,thentheCitymayelecttomove
forwardwithdirectnegotiations.
Ms.Leonardnotedthat,ifauthorizedbytheCityCouncil,theRFQwillbe
distributedimmediatelywithcandidatesubmittalsduebyDecember8,2015and
reviewedbytheCityCouncilatitsregularmeetingonDecember14,2015.
CharlotteGablermovedtoaccepttheRequestforQualificationsformand
authorizedstafftodistributeittothetelecommunicationscommunity
accordingly.LloydHilgartsecondedthemotion.Motioncarried
unanimously.
5.AddedItems
BrianStumpfaddedtwoitemsfordiscussion:
1)FriendshipIsland.Thediscussioncenteredonpossiblyexpandingtheprogram.
CurrentlyFriendshipIslandhasanetprofitandtherehasbeentalkaboutexpanding
theprogram.TomPerraultquestionedwhytheCitywasinvolvedinthemanagingof
adaycare.CharlotteGablerrespondedthatthisismoreofaParksandRecreation
program/classoftheCommunityCenter.
BrianStumpfmovedtodirectstafftoworkwiththeCommunityCenterto
investigatethepossibleexpansionofFriendshipIslandatthelocationofthe
CityCouncilMinutes–November23,2015 Page7|7
WestPrairieBuilding.CharlotteGablersecondedthemotion.Motioncarried
unanimously.
2)BrianStumpfpresentedthathewantedtoincreasethepayto$7.75/hr.offourpart-
timeminorpositionsattheCommunityCenter(rockclimbingwallattendant,child
careattendant,icerinkattendant,andslideattendant).HenotedthattheMCCis
havingadifficulttimehiringparttimehelp.WayneObergrespondedthatifthereis
aconsensushecouldaddthistothebudgetresolution.
CharlotteGablermovedapprovalofincreasingthepart-timepayforthe
mentionedfourpositionsto$7.75/hour.TomPerraultsecondedthemotion.
Motioncarriedunanimously.
6.Adjournment
Byconsensusthemeetingwasadjournedat8:12p.m.
Recorder:JenniferSchreiber_____
Approved:
Attest:_________________________
CityAdministrator
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
1
2A.Considerationtoapprovethepaymentofbills (WO)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
Citystaffsubmitstheattachedbillregistersandpurchasingcardregistersforapprovalby
Council.Thebillregisterscontainallinvoicesprocessedandthepurchasingcard
registerscontainallcardpurchasesmadesincethelastCouncilmeeting.SubjecttoMN
Statutes,mostinvoicesrequireCouncilapprovalpriortoreleasingchecksforpayment.
ThedayfollowingCouncilapproval,paymentswillbereleasedunlessdirected
otherwise.AcreditpurchasingagreementandpolicywasapprovedbyCouncilinitially
andcardpurchasesmustcomplywiththepolicy.
IfCouncilhasnoquestionsorcommentsonthebillandpurchasecardregisters,thesecan
beapprovedwiththeconsentagenda.Ifrequested,thisitemcanberemovedfrom
consentanddiscussedpriortomakingamotionforapproval.
A1.BudgetImpact:None
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Noadditionalworkrequired
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.Motiontoapprovethebillandpurchasecardregistersforatotalamountof
$975,978.23.
2.MotiontoapprovetheregisterswithchangesdirectedbyCouncil.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1or#2,perdirectionofCouncil.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
•Billregisters
•PurchaseCardregisters
User:
Printed:12/01/2015 - 2:03PM
Debbie.Davidson
Computer Check Proof List by Vendor
Accounts Payable
Batch:00215.11.2015 - 215.11.2015 Xcel/CPE
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:1102 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: True
11/30/2015 5863599-6 17.37 11/30/2015 101-42700-438300
11/30/2015 5864452-7 152.74 11/30/2015 101-45501-438300
11/30/2015 5788570-9 23.72 11/30/2015 609-49754-438300
11/30/2015 5804618-6 15.85 11/30/2015 101-45201-438300
11/30/2015 5768542-2 119.03 11/30/2015 101-41940-438300
11/30/2015 5768542-2 2,752.60 11/30/2015 226-45122-438300
11/30/2015 5768542-2 44.64 11/30/2015 101-45175-438300
11/30/2015 5768542-2 59.52 11/30/2015 101-42800-438300
11/30/2015 5828859-8 15.85 11/30/2015 101-41940-438300
11/30/2015 8235331-9 80.16 11/30/2015 101-41941-438300
11/30/2015 5843395-5 15.00 11/30/2015 217-41990-438300
11/30/2015 5806932-5 15.85 11/30/2015 101-45201-438300
11/30/2015 5821009-5 51.22 11/30/2015 101-42200-438300
11/30/2015 8235333-5 20.92 11/30/2015 101-41941-438300
11/30/2015 5799425-5 37.62 11/30/2015 101-43127-438300
11/30/2015 5799427-5 21.58 11/30/2015 101-43127-438300
11/30/2015 5820786-5 22.19 11/30/2015 101-43127-438300
11/30/2015 5837384-5 55.30 11/30/2015 101-43127-438300
3,521.16Check Total:
Vendor:1585 XCEL ENERGY Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: True
11/30/2015 51-4400193-4 17.20 11/30/2015 101-43160-438100
11/30/2015 51-6505905-0 6,310.32 11/30/2015 601-49440-438100
11/30/2015 51-6505906-1 1,794.01 11/30/2015 602-49490-438100
11/30/2015 51-0395766-0 2,125.32 11/30/2015 601-49440-438100
11/30/2015 51-4271112-2 809.87 11/30/2015 101-45501-438100
11/30/2015 51-6505907-2 55.00 11/30/2015 101-43140-438100
11/30/2015 ZZNEP-IMPLEM- 51-6505908-3 16.50 11/30/2015 101-42500-438100
11/30/2015 51-6505909-4 264.84 11/30/2015 217-41990-438100
11/30/2015 51-655910-7 2,279.70 11/30/2015 609-49754-438100
11/30/2015 51-6505911-8 - City Hall 1,576.71 11/30/2015 101-41940-438100
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/01/2015 - 2:03 PM)Page 1
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
11/30/2015 51-6505911-8 - MCC 7,141.58 11/30/2015 226-45122-438100
11/30/2015 51-6505911-8 - Senior Center 370.99 11/30/2015 101-45175-438100
11/30/2015 51-6505911-8 - National Guard 185.50 11/30/2015 101-42800-438100
11/30/2015 51-6505912-9 85.42 11/30/2015 101-42700-438100
11/30/2015 51-6505914-1 1,247.01 11/30/2015 101-43127-438100
11/30/2015 51-6505915-2 524.75 11/30/2015 101-45201-438100
11/30/2015 51-6505915-2 - 33% skating rink Water Dept 27.24 11/30/2015 601-49440-438100
11/30/2015 51-6505915-2 - Ballfield Lts NSP-consc & secty lts 292.69 11/30/2015 226-45203-438100
11/30/2015 51-6505915-2 - Ballfield Lts NSP-Softball Assc. Field 104.13 11/30/2015 101-45203-438100
11/30/2015 51-6505916-3 12,701.62 11/30/2015 101-43160-438100
11/30/2015 51-7780310-4 31.28 11/30/2015 101-41940-438100
11/30/2015 51-9069641-8 1,948.27 11/30/2015 656-49877-438100
11/30/2015 51-9391437-3 236.37 11/30/2015 101-41941-438100
11/30/2015 ZCULPS - 51-0623082-8 17.09 11/30/2015 213-46522-438100
11/30/2015 51-0371645-4 18.72 11/30/2015 101-45201-438100
11/30/2015 51-6505913-0 533.33 11/30/2015 101-42200-438100
11/30/2015 51-6505916-3- refund City Fees -451.53 11/30/2015 101-43160-438100
40,263.93Check Total:
Total for Check Run:
Total of Number of Checks:
43,785.09
2
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/01/2015 - 2:03 PM)Page 2
The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment.
Date: 12/14/2015 Approved by ___________________________________
Mayor Brian Stumpff
User:
Printed:12/02/2015 - 4:00PM
Debbie.Davidson
Computer Check Proof List by Vendor
Accounts Payable
Batch:00202.12.2015 - 202.12.2015 Liquor
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: False
3067001 resale - beer 64.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425200
3067657 resale - beer 133.50 12/02/2015 609-49750-425200
3068695 resale - beer 197.50 12/02/2015 609-49750-425200
330412 resale- beer credit inv. ref #3065702 -32.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425200
363.00Check Total:
Vendor:1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: True
51092800 freight 16.15 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
51092800 resale - wine 252.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
51092800 resale - liquor 1,102.53 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
93041300 resale - condiments 56.19 12/02/2015 609-49750-425500
93041300 freight 0.26 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
1,427.13Check Total:
Vendor:1067 BERNICK'S Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: False
50645 resale - soda pop 78.80 12/02/2015 609-49750-425400
50645 resale -juice 32.80 12/02/2015 609-49750-425500
50646 resale -beer 929.80 12/02/2015 609-49750-425200
53416 resale - soda pop 133.30 12/02/2015 609-49750-425400
53416 resale - juice 32.80 12/02/2015 609-49750-425500
53417 resale - beer 1,798.05 12/02/2015 609-49750-425200
3,005.55Check Total:
Vendor:4293 BLUE ROSE CAPITAL ADVISORS INC.Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: True
798 Series 2015B Gen Oblig Street Reconstruction & Improvement Bond 2,000.00 12/02/2015 400-43300-462030
2,000.00Check Total:
Vendor:1095 CARLOS CREEK WINERY INC Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: False
11898 resale - wine 606.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/02/2015 - 4:00 PM)Page 1
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
11909 resale - wine 492.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
1,098.00Check Total:
Vendor:1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: True
1178919 resale - beer 52.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425200
118245 resale - beer 11,886.64 12/02/2015 609-49750-425200
118245 resale - beer n/a 24.30 12/02/2015 609-49750-425400
118474 resale - beer 367.95 12/02/2015 609-49750-425200
118474 resale - beer n/a 51.25 12/02/2015 609-49750-425400
118532 resale - beer -246.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425200
118595 resale - beer 26,411.29 12/02/2015 609-49750-425200
118595 resale - beer n/a 90.65 12/02/2015 609-49750-425400
118732 resale - beer -372.80 12/02/2015 609-49750-425200
118838 resale - beer 2,551.15 12/02/2015 609-49750-425200
118931 resale - beer -70.40 12/02/2015 609-49750-425200
119082 resale - beer 26,392.88 12/02/2015 609-49750-425200
119082 resale - beer n/a 259.80 12/02/2015 609-49750-425400
67,398.71Check Total:
Vendor:1167 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: False
W1312942 resale - rootbeer 139.60 12/02/2015 609-49750-425400
W1322697 resale - rootbeer 104.70 12/02/2015 609-49750-425400
244.30Check Total:
Vendor:1662 FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME COMPANY Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: False
331297 resale - mix 231.30 12/02/2015 609-49750-425500
231.30Check Total:
Vendor:4218 HOHENSTEINS, INC Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: False
795875 resale - beer 123.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425200
796763 resale - beer 262.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425200
385.00Check Total:
Vendor:3971 INTL UNION OF OPER ENGINEERS LOCAL 49 FRINGE BENE Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: False
January 2016 January Health Insurance 49,200.00 12/02/2015 101-00000-217061
January 2016 January Health Insurance 13,780.00 12/02/2015 101-00000-217061
62,980.00Check Total:
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/02/2015 - 4:00 PM)Page 2
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:1259 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: False
2452284 resale - beer 5,244.30 12/02/2015 609-49750-425200
2452284 resale - beer n/a 118.70 12/02/2015 609-49750-425400
2452316 freight 3.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
2452316 resale - beer 1,098.20 12/02/2015 609-49750-425200
6,464.20Check Total:
Vendor:1263 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: False
5304779 resale - liquor 2,731.80 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
5304779 freight 13.50 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
5304780 freight 15.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
5304780 resale - wine 1,538.30 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
5304781 resale - liquor 416.75 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
5304781 freight 2.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
5304782 freight 26.63 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
5304782 resale - wine 2,995.75 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
5306854 freight 8.75 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
5306854 resale - liquor 2,275.56 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
5306855 resale - wine 3,124.35 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
5306855 freight 27.16 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
5308822 resale - liquor 291.35 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
5308822 freight 1.50 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
5308823 freight 9.50 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
5308823 resale - wine 864.30 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
5309755 resale - wine 74.50 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
5310530 resale - liquor 3,650.81 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
5310530 freight 52.79 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
5310531 resale - wine 948.70 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
5310531 resale - wine n/a 98.47 12/02/2015 609-49750-425400
5310531 freight 36.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
5310532 resale - beer 78.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425200
5311397 resale- beer 46.08 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
5311397 resale- liquor 3,452.17 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
5311398 resale - wine 7,513.38 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
5311398 resale - wine n/a 36.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425400
5311398 freight 195.96 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
5311399 resale- beer 43.98 12/02/2015 609-49750-425200
5311400 resale- beer 0.36 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
5312924 freight 1.44 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
5312924 resale - liquor 64.50 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
5315312 resale - liquor 6,655.66 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
5315312 freight 78.12 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/02/2015 - 4:00 PM)Page 3
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
5315313 freight 112.32 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
5315313 resale - wine 3,710.25 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
5315314 resale - beer 43.98 12/02/2015 609-49750-425200
552545 resale - wine cr inv. 5306855 -234.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
552545 resale - wine cr inv. 5306855 -1.50 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
552796 resale - liquorcr inv. 5295596 -14.75 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
553138 resale - liquor cr. inv. 5299401 -6.54 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
553827 resale - wine cr. inv. 5311398 -52.60 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
553827 resale - freight cr. inv. 5311398 -1.44 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
40,924.84Check Total:
Vendor:1303 M AMUNDSON LLP Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: True
206811 resale - cigarettes 232.14 12/02/2015 609-49750-425500
206811 resale -tobacco; bottle opener; bottle wraps; etc 299.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425400
531.14Check Total:
Vendor:1377 MONTICELLO SENIOR CENTER Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: True
11/24/2015 Monthly Allocation - November 4,583.33 12/02/2015 101-45175-444310
4,583.33Check Total:
Vendor:1273 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: False
8523702 resale -wine 1,542.12 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
8523702 freight 21.25 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
8524516 resale -wine 895.98 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
8524516 freight 12.50 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
8525437 freight 10.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
8525437 resale - wine 703.14 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
8525439 resale -wine credit ref #8523702 -39.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
8525439 freight credit ref #8523702 -1.25 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
8525446 resale - liquor 162.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
8525446 freight 2.25 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
3,308.99Check Total:
Vendor:1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: False
225805 resale - wine cr. inv 2882239 -50.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
225805 freight cr. inv 2882239 -0.50 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
225901 resale- liquor cr. inv 2884688 -123.65 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
225901 freight cr. inv 2884688 -0.50 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
225902 resale- liquor cr. inv 2883280 -2,449.50 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
225902 freight cr. inv 2883280 -5.50 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/02/2015 - 4:00 PM)Page 4
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
226051 resale - wine cr. inv 2810733 -71.40 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
226224 resale - liquor cr. inv 2883280 -237.05 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
226224 freight cr. inv 2883280 -1.44 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
226352 freight cr. inv 2884688 -4.32 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
226352 resale liquor cr. inv 2884688 -235.50 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
226575 resale wine cr. inv 2887863 -108.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
226575 freight cr. inv 2887863 -2.88 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
2883280 resale - liquor 12,548.55 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
2883280 freight 53.34 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
2883281 resale - wine 1,087.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
2883281 freight 11.50 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
2883282 freight 2.02 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
2883282 resale - liquor 527.49 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
2884688 resale - liquor 2,480.20 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
2884688 freight 14.58 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
2884689 freight 16.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
2884689 resale - wine 2,351.80 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
2886112 resale - liquor 273.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
2886112 freight 1.50 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
2886113 freight 1.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
2886113 resale - liquor 226.25 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
2887243 resale - liquor 1,697.96 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
2887243 freight 28.80 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
2887244 freight 70.56 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
2887244 resale - wine 1,769.80 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
2887862 resale - liquor 3,700.92 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
2887862 freight 37.31 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
2887863 resale - wine 2,629.15 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
2887863 freight 60.48 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
2888946 freight 5.76 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
2888946 resale - liquor 387.69 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
2890517 freight 93.48 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
2890517 resale - liquor 8,549.48 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
2890518 resale - wine 2,448.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
2890518 freight 59.04 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
37,842.42Check Total:
Vendor:1474 PATRICIA A SALZWEDEL Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: True
11/24/2015 Semi Monthly Contract Payment 1,593.75 12/02/2015 101-42700-431200
1,593.75Check Total:
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/02/2015 - 4:00 PM)Page 5
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:3309 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF MINNESOTA Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: False
1349402 resale - liquor 1,946.26 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
1349402 freight 23.81 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
1349404 freight 75.60 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
1349404 resale - wine 5,073.55 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
1351468 resale - liquor 885.50 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
1351468 freight 15.40 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
1351469 freight 21.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
1351469 resale - wine 1,026.35 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
9,067.47Check Total:
Vendor:1522 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Check Sequence: 19 ACH Enabled: True
989290 resale -beer 16,146.66 12/02/2015 609-49750-425200
995793 resale -beer 51.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425200
995793 resale -beer 94.90 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
995794 resale -beer n/a 51.40 12/02/2015 609-49750-425400
998011 resale -beer 11,521.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425200
998011 resale -beer n/a 165.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425400
998012 resale -beer n/a 36.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425400
999628 resale -beer 1,491.50 12/02/2015 609-49750-425200
29,557.46Check Total:
Vendor:1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Check Sequence: 20 ACH Enabled: True
1656006 resale - soda pop 164.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425400
1656146 resale - soda pop 437.35 12/02/2015 609-49750-425400
1656147 resale - soda pop credit -11.80 12/02/2015 609-49750-425400
1660066 resale - soda pop 240.25 12/02/2015 609-49750-425400
829.80Check Total:
Vendor:1684 VINOCOPIA Check Sequence: 21 ACH Enabled: True
0138319 resale - wine 288.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
0138319 freight 7.50 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
0138320 freight 7.50 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
0138320 resale - wine 288.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
0138590 resale - wine 957.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
0138590 resale - liquor 1,647.50 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
0138590 freight 51.75 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
0139085 resale - wine 112.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
3,359.25Check Total:
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/02/2015 - 4:00 PM)Page 6
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:1572 THE WINE COMPANY Check Sequence: 22 ACH Enabled: True
409933 freight 9.90 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
409933 resale - wine 696.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
411075 freight 4.20 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
411075 resale - wine 272.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
982.10Check Total:
Vendor:1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC Check Sequence: 23 ACH Enabled: False
7056188 freight 12.62 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
7056188 resale - wine 3,446.95 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
7057136 freight 32.76 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
7057136 resale - wine 2,396.20 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
7057906 freight 20.16 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
7057906 resale - wine 1,059.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
6,967.69Check Total:
Vendor:1209 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE & SPIRITS Check Sequence: 24 ACH Enabled: False
1080401029 resale - liquor 2,959.71 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
1080401029 resale - wine 1,471.04 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
1080401029 freight 80.59 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
1080403750 freight 93.23 12/02/2015 609-49750-433300
1080403750 resale - wine 1,166.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
1080403750 resale - liquor 6,283.48 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
1080403750 resale - n/a wine 36.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425400
1080403751 resale - wine 56.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425300
2080113554 resale - credit liquor -141.96 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
2080113559 resale - credit liquor -20.00 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
2080113560 resale - credit liquor -27.50 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
2080113564 resale - credit liquor -41.33 12/02/2015 609-49750-425100
11,915.26Check Total:
Total for Check Run:
Total of Number of Checks:
297,060.69
24
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/02/2015 - 4:00 PM)Page 7
The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment.
Date: 12/14/2015 Approved by ___________________________________
Mayor Brian Stumpff
User:
Printed:12/09/2015 - 1:46PM
Julie.Cheney
Computer Check Proof List by Vendor
Accounts Payable
Batch:00203.12.2015 - 00203.12.2015 AP
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:3974 A+ TAXI OF MONTICELLO INC Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: True
20130788 November 2013 - 870 rides 3,333.33 12/15/2015 101-45178-431990
3,333.33Check Total:
Vendor:1006 ABM EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY LLC Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: True
145631 (6) Kanaflex hose 8" 431.46 12/15/2015 602-49490-422100
431.46Check Total:
Vendor:4303 ALDEN POOL & MUNICIPAL SUPPLY CO Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: False
15563 (20) gasket nozzle; #15 nozzle; valve; etc 148.50 12/15/2015 601-49440-421990
148.50Check Total:
Vendor:2087 ALL WAYS HEATING AND AC INC Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: False
5091 PW office- Sparker Wire; clean sensor; 948.75 12/15/2015 101-43127-440100
948.75Check Total:
Vendor:1020 ALMCO HYDRAULICS INC Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: False
16669 Preventative mtc inspection/baler 139.00 12/15/2015 609-49754-431990
139.00Check Total:
Vendor:4298 SHIRLEY ANDERSON Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: False
12/03/2015 FiberNet acct. 763-295-2040 Final credit 16.68 12/15/2015 656-00000-115025
16.68Check Total:
Vendor:1038 APPERTS FOOD SERVICE Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: False
507250119 Credit for Milk -17.75 12/15/2015 226-45127-425410
512040485 Freight 5.00 12/15/2015 226-45122-433300
512040485 resale - concession: yogurt, bagels, muffins, pizzas, pretzels, 464.47 12/15/2015 226-45127-425410
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/09/2015 - 1:46 PM)Page 1
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
512040485 Party Supplies - cheese pizzas (13) 64.63 12/15/2015 226-45127-421460
516.35Check Total:
Vendor:3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: False
3069892 resale - beer 210.00 12/15/2015 609-49750-425200
331222 resale - beer credit inv.#3067657 -80.10 12/15/2015 609-49750-425200
129.90Check Total:
Vendor:4046 AST SPORTS INC Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: True
16277 Hoodie (3), jacket (1), polo shirts (3) 500.01 12/15/2015 101-42400-421110
500.01Check Total:
Vendor:2886 AUSCO DESIGN AND MARKETING Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: False
2224 (10) jacket/logo & personalized- split 97.50 12/15/2015 101-43120-421110
2224 (8) jacket/logo & personalized- split 78.00 12/15/2015 101-45201-421110
2224 (1.5) jacket/logo & personalized- split 14.63 12/15/2015 601-49440-421110
2224 (1.5) jacket/logo & personalized- split 14.62 12/15/2015 602-49490-421110
204.75Check Total:
Vendor:1061 BBF PROPERTIES INC Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: False
TIF 22.1 Pay as you go 2nd Interest PID 155.076.001010 20,932.26 12/15/2015 213-46581-465110
20,932.26Check Total:
Vendor:1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: True
51264700 resale - wine 163.36 12/15/2015 609-49750-425300
51264700 resale - liquor 350.50 12/15/2015 609-49750-425100
51264700 freight 12.61 12/15/2015 609-49750-433300
93105700 freight 0.09 12/15/2015 609-49750-433300
93105700 resale- hi-ball 10 oz. 20.00 12/15/2015 609-49750-425400
546.56Check Total:
Vendor:1067 BERNICK'S Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: False
51197 Bottled Water for Parties 19.20 12/15/2015 226-45127-421460
51197 Resale - pop, water, milk, juice 371.15 12/15/2015 226-45127-425410
56884 Resale - water, pop, 835.50 12/15/2015 226-45127-425410
1,225.85Check Total:
Vendor:2535 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: True
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/09/2015 - 1:46 PM)Page 2
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
910375042 (100) Universal remote 769.69 12/15/2015 656-49877-421990
910407001 (6) Patchcord Scapc - various 402.34 12/15/2015 656-49877-421990
910422532 (6) EZ-RJ45 C5E Conn 50/csh 168.22 12/15/2015 656-49877-421990
910430675 (3) PX1-001-CAD-10-0500F; (3) 10-025F; (1) 100F; (1) 075F 350.54 12/15/2015 656-49877-421990
1,690.79Check Total:
Vendor:3632 BRIAN BRAMLEY Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: True
5018 FireDN- Expense -Evolution6000-DBA- Emergency Response Solution 9,028.41 12/15/2015 101-42200-421990
9,028.41Check Total:
Vendor:2047 BRIDGE WATER TELEPHONE COMPANY Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: True
0665FNMT-15317 Voice - Monthly Access Charge Interstate - 11/13-12/12/15 520.23 12/15/2015 656-49879-430910
520.23Check Total:
Vendor:2890 BROTHERS FIRE PROTECTION CO Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: True
13283 2015 sprinker inspec - annual PW 175.00 12/15/2015 101-43127-431990
175.00Check Total:
Vendor:4296 STEPHANIE BROUILLARD Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: False
12/03/2015 FiberNet acct. FNM-001-1286 Final credit 7.08 12/15/2015 656-00000-115025
7.08Check Total:
Vendor:3278 SHANNON BYE Check Sequence: 19 ACH Enabled: False
12/09/2015 Monticello Joint Planning Board -02/11 & 9/9/2015 70.00 12/15/2015 101-41310-431990
70.00Check Total:
Vendor:1749 CALIX NETWORKS INC Check Sequence: 20 ACH Enabled: True
10008552 Flow Analyzer -Dec.2015 395.00 12/15/2015 656-49877-431900
10008553 Compass Consumer Connect-Dec.2015 245.00 12/15/2015 656-49877-431900
1134230 Set up- Flow Analyzer; Comp. Consmr. Cnct; etc 5,495.00 12/15/2015 656-49877-431900
1134277 Consulting Discount -3,000.00 12/15/2015 656-49877-431900
3,135.00Check Total:
Vendor:1091 CAMPBELL KNUTSON PA Check Sequence: 21 ACH Enabled: True
2348-000G 159 ZZBCOL - Oct 2015 225.00 12/15/2015 229-45202-431990
2348-000G 159 FiberNet - Oct 2015 750.00 12/15/2015 656-49870-430400
2348-000G 159 Oct 2015 - General 3,771.48 12/15/2015 101-41610-430400
2348-000G 159 Oct 2015 - Legal - Farmstead Ave 75.00 12/15/2015 601-49440-431990
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/09/2015 - 1:46 PM)Page 3
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
2348-103G 100 FiberNet/Broadband Project - Oct 2015 750.00 12/15/2015 656-49870-430400
2348-125G 7 ZRCFOS - Church St.Henry/Fallon Ave Improvement - Oct 2015 1,725.00 12/15/2015 101-41610-430400
2348-133G 4 15D005- Hoglund - Oct 2015 267.00 12/15/2015 101-00000-220110
7,563.48Check Total:
Vendor:1101 CENTERLINE FRAME & AUTO BODY Check Sequence: 22 ACH Enabled: False
1883 #5 - decals; Ladder 1 - wiper blades; repr. master selnoid 488.45 12/15/2015 101-42200-440500
1887 Ladder truck - flag pole & mount for 8x12 flag 287.00 12/15/2015 101-42200-440500
775.45Check Total:
Vendor:1106 CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC Check Sequence: 23 ACH Enabled: False
00056280 Monthly Tank Rental 45.00 12/15/2015 226-45122-441500
00902975 Bulk Carbon Dioxide (255 lbs) 77.00 12/15/2015 226-45122-421600
122.00Check Total:
Vendor:3973 CENTRAL TRAILER SALES INC Check Sequence: 24 ACH Enabled: False
12/3/2015 PJ B5 22' trailer; exles w/ elec brakes; fold up gate; sp tire; 4,412.75 12/15/2015 101-45201-424100
4,412.75Check Total:
Vendor:2654 CENTURYLINK Check Sequence: 25 ACH Enabled: False
L08004204215312 monthly access ch.- 11/8-12/7/2015 2.58 12/15/2015 656-49879-430910
2.58Check Total:
Vendor:2654 CENTURYLINK Check Sequence: 26 ACH Enabled: False
L04003703715312 monthly access ch.- 11/8-12/7/2015 102.52 12/15/2015 656-49879-430910
102.52Check Total:
Vendor:2654 CENTURYLINK Check Sequence: 27 ACH Enabled: False
R97006006015312 monthly access ch.- 11/8-12/7/2015 143.37 12/15/2015 656-49879-430910
143.37Check Total:
Vendor:2654 CENTURYLINK Check Sequence: 28 ACH Enabled: False
R72010610161531 monthly access ch.- 11/8-12/7/2015 600.00 12/15/2015 656-49879-430910
600.00Check Total:
Vendor:4158 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT COMPANY Check Sequence: 29 ACH Enabled: False
151115 (9.24) T- Dura Drive Hotmix 536.38 12/15/2015 601-49440-422700
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/09/2015 - 1:46 PM)Page 4
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
536.38Check Total:
Vendor:3831 RAELYNN COOK Check Sequence: 30 ACH Enabled: True
11/23/2015 Mileage to APA Chapter Meeting (81.6 miles) 46.92 12/15/2015 101-41520-433100
46.92Check Total:
Vendor:1124 CREATIVE FORMS AND CONCEPTS INC Check Sequence: 31 ACH Enabled: False
114273 2015 Tax Forms 268.13 12/15/2015 101-41520-421990
268.13Check Total:
Vendor:2080 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT INC Check Sequence: 32 ACH Enabled: True
F37490 9'2 VXT Steel plow 2016 Ford - Parks 6,154.38 12/15/2015 703-00000-165010
6,154.38Check Total:
Vendor:2476 CSI DIGITAL INC Check Sequence: 33 ACH Enabled: True
103320 Nov 2015 - Monthly Fiber Feed- 1 Gbps /mo. 2,700.00 12/15/2015 656-49879-430930
2,700.00Check Total:
Vendor:4205 MICHAEL CYR Check Sequence: 34 ACH Enabled: False
TIF 1-29 Pay as you go 2nd Principal 7,736.39 12/15/2015 213-46529-465110
7,736.39Check Total:
Vendor:1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 35 ACH Enabled: True
116465 resale - beer credit inv 116414 samples -25.35 12/15/2015 609-49750-425200
119277 resale - beer 737.40 12/15/2015 609-49750-425200
119479 resale - beer 368.00 12/15/2015 609-49750-425200
119508 resale - beer 256.80 12/15/2015 609-49750-425200
1,336.85Check Total:
Vendor:1140 DEX MEDIA EAST INC Check Sequence: 36 ACH Enabled: False
110130145 12/15 11/11/15-11/30/15 Buffalo White & Yellow extension 32.33 12/15/2015 609-49754-434990
32.33Check Total:
Vendor:4233 DI-MAR CONSTRUCTION INC Check Sequence: 37 ACH Enabled: False
Voucher No 4 14C002 - PHOSPH - Pay Voucher #4 123,959.88 12/15/2015 602-00000-165010
123,959.88Check Total:
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/09/2015 - 1:46 PM)Page 5
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:1153 ECM PUBLISHERS INC Check Sequence: 38 ACH Enabled: True
271973 Ad # 464149 Fall 2015 wine sale - 10/29 & 30/2015 803.50 12/15/2015 609-49754-434990
277077 Ad # 464153 Fall wine sale - 11/13/15 266.25 12/15/2015 609-49754-434990
278323 ZZHELI - PID 155208001010 - Ad# 464424 147.68 12/15/2015 101-41910-435100
278324 Ordinance 626A - Ad# 476939 156.91 12/15/2015 101-41310-435100
282863 Ordinance 627A - Ad# 482391 138.45 12/15/2015 101-41310-435100
1,512.79Check Total:
Vendor:1170 FASTENAL COMPANY Check Sequence: 39 ACH Enabled: False
MNMON92016 4th St- building supplies 71.59 12/15/2015 101-45201-422300
71.59Check Total:
Vendor:2273 FIBERNET MONTICELLO - ACH Check Sequence: 40 ACH Enabled: True
12/1/2015 City Hall Phone Dec 2015 856.34 12/15/2015 702-00000-432100
12/1/2015 MCC Phone Dec 2015 609.62 12/15/2015 702-00000-432100
12/1/2015 Ballfields Phone Dec 2015 19.29 12/15/2015 702-00000-432100
12/1/2015 DMV Phone Dec 2015 272.86 12/15/2015 702-00000-432100
12/1/2015 Liquor Phone Dec 2015 278.13 12/15/2015 702-00000-432100
12/1/2015 Fire Hall Phone Dec 2015 235.88 12/15/2015 702-00000-432100
12/1/2015 Public Works Phone Dec 2015 344.57 12/15/2015 702-00000-432100
12/1/2015 Parks Phone Dec 2015 113.29 12/15/2015 702-00000-432100
12/1/2015 Prairie Center Phone Dec 2015 20.52 12/15/2015 702-00000-432100
12/1/2015 Sheriff Phone Dec 2015 68.56 12/15/2015 702-00000-432100
12/1/2015 City Hall Internet Dec 2015 99.95 12/15/2015 702-00000-432300
12/1/2015 MCC Internet Dec 2015 10.00 12/15/2015 702-00000-432300
12/1/2015 Ballfields Internet Dec 2015 10.00 12/15/2015 702-00000-432300
12/1/2015 DMV Internet Dec 2015 41.95 12/15/2015 702-00000-432300
12/1/2015 Liquor Internet Dec 2015 41.95 12/15/2015 702-00000-432300
12/1/2015 Fire Hall Internet Dec 2015 41.95 12/15/2015 702-00000-432300
12/1/2015 Animal Shelter Internet Dec 2015 29.95 12/15/2015 702-00000-432300
12/1/2015 Public Works Internet Dec 2015 69.95 12/15/2015 702-00000-432300
12/1/2015 Sheriff Internet Dec 2015 41.95 12/15/2015 702-00000-432300
12/1/2015 City Hall Cable Dec 2015 12.30 12/15/2015 101-41310-431990
12/1/2015 MCC Cable Dec 2015 315.28 12/15/2015 226-45122-432500
12/1/2015 Data Hosting Dec 2015 500.00 12/15/2015 702-00000-431900
12/1/2015 Service Contract Dec 2015 250.00 12/15/2015 702-00000-431900
4,284.29Check Total:
Vendor:4045 DAN GLESER Check Sequence: 41 ACH Enabled: True
387233 FNM Xconn- SMF - Nov. 2015 990.00 12/15/2015 656-49877-431900
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/09/2015 - 1:46 PM)Page 6
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
990.00Check Total:
Vendor:1859 GODFATHER'S EXTERMINATING INC Check Sequence: 42 ACH Enabled: False
104790 pest control.11/24/15 58.78 12/15/2015 609-49754-431990
58.78Check Total:
Vendor:4090 GOLDEN WEST TECHNOLOGIES Check Sequence: 43 ACH Enabled: False
151110450 (82) Dial time sup.; Usage; (582) Helpdesk;(428) Video Sup 1,366.50 12/15/2015 656-49870-431990
1,366.50Check Total:
Vendor:1413 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC Check Sequence: 44 ACH Enabled: True
150434 November 2015 (104) locates -1/2 76.95 12/15/2015 601-49440-432770
150434 November 2015 (104) locates -1/2 76.95 12/15/2015 656-49877-432770
153.90Check Total:
Vendor:4292 BRITTANY HALL Check Sequence: 45 ACH Enabled: False
11/19/2015 Refund Chapel - R2182 411.70 12/15/2015 226-45122-347570
11/19/2015 Refund Chapel - R2182 28.30 12/15/2015 226-00000-208100
440.00Check Total:
Vendor:1630 HOGLUND BODY AND EQUIPMENT INC Check Sequence: 46 ACH Enabled: False
10224 Bedliner; Undercoat 2016 Ford - Parks 938.00 12/15/2015 703-00000-165010
938.00Check Total:
Vendor:4218 HOHENSTEINS, INC Check Sequence: 47 ACH Enabled: False
798100 resale - beer 408.00 12/15/2015 609-49750-425200
408.00Check Total:
Vendor:2008 BRETT HOLKER Check Sequence: 48 ACH Enabled: False
12/09/2015 Monticello Joint Planning Board -02/11 & 9/9/2015 70.00 12/15/2015 101-41310-431990
70.00Check Total:
Vendor:1244 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY Check Sequence: 49 ACH Enabled: False
151117011 Pool Chemicals 36.48 12/15/2015 226-45122-421600
36.48Check Total:
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/09/2015 - 1:46 PM)Page 7
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:3369 JAKE'S EXCAVATING INC Check Sequence: 50 ACH Enabled: True
2822 Veches - 11-9-2015 400.00 12/15/2015 651-49010-431150
400.00Check Total:
Vendor:2625 JIGSAW BUILDERS INC Check Sequence: 51 ACH Enabled: False
151110-01 Materials to repair existing miniture house 134.26 12/15/2015 101-42200-422300
134.26Check Total:
Vendor:1259 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING Check Sequence: 52 ACH Enabled: False
2452353 resale - beer 3,340.45 12/15/2015 609-49750-425200
3,340.45Check Total:
Vendor:3855 JOANNE C JOHNSON Check Sequence: 53 ACH Enabled: False
11/14/2015 BLANDN - Border to Border Broadband Event - JJ 120.00 12/15/2015 656-00000-220250
120.00Check Total:
Vendor:1263 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE LIQUOR Check Sequence: 54 ACH Enabled: False
5316121 resale - liquor 1,945.50 12/15/2015 609-49750-425100
5316121 freight 17.05 12/15/2015 609-49750-433300
5316122 resale - wine 1,607.55 12/15/2015 609-49750-425300
5316122 freight 38.88 12/15/2015 609-49750-433300
5318754 freight 17.28 12/15/2015 609-49750-433300
5318754 resale- liquor 1,291.74 12/15/2015 609-49750-425100
5318755 resale- wine 461.55 12/15/2015 609-49750-425300
5318755 freight 14.40 12/15/2015 609-49750-433300
552543 resale - wine credit inv. 5304780 -33.99 12/15/2015 609-49750-425300
552544 resale - wine credit inv. 5299402 -9.71 12/15/2015 609-49750-425300
5,350.25Check Total:
Vendor:1270 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN CHARTERED Check Sequence: 55 ACH Enabled: False
11/18/2015 Series 2015B - Preparation/Examination/Closing/Issuance 6,500.00 12/15/2015 400-43300-462030
6,500.00Check Total:
Vendor:1274 KNIFE RIVER CORPORATION-NORTH CENTRAL Check Sequence: 56 ACH Enabled: False
10241 Xcel 51-0010995601-7 -reimbrs. Oct-Dec. 25/CR106 signals 179.17 12/15/2015 101-43160-438100
179.17Check Total:
Vendor:2009 NANCY KOPFF Check Sequence: 57 ACH Enabled: False
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/09/2015 - 1:46 PM)Page 8
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
12/09/2015 Monticello Joint Planning Board - Secretry 02/11 & 9/9/2015 150.00 12/15/2015 101-41310-431990
150.00Check Total:
Vendor:4302 KWIK TRIP INC ATTN: CHRIS MCGUIRE Check Sequence: 58 ACH Enabled: False
11/20/2015 Refund Grading Deposit from 7/29/15 6,030.00 12/15/2015 101-00000-220200
6,030.00Check Total:
Vendor:1631 LANO EQUIPMENT INC Check Sequence: 59 ACH Enabled: False
02-343380 #215 - Joystick; Oil 811.35 12/15/2015 101-45201-422100
12/08/2015 Virnig HD Pallet Forks- 48" Tines 1,100.00 12/15/2015 101-45201-424100
NEW 12/8/15 68" Angle Broom; 30C Auger Drive; Mount Frame 5,943.20 12/15/2015 101-45201-422100
7,854.55Check Total:
Vendor:2626 HARRY LANTTO Check Sequence: 60 ACH Enabled: True
11/29/2015 Planning Commission Meeting Recording 11/2/15 60.00 12/15/2015 101-41910-431990
11/29/2015 EDA Meeting Recording 11/18/15 60.00 12/15/2015 213-46301-431990
11/29/2015 City Council Meeting Recording 11/9/15 & 11/23/15 122.50 12/15/2015 101-41110-431990
242.50Check Total:
Vendor:1291 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST Check Sequence: 61 ACH Enabled: False
11/30/2015 LMCIT Claim #C0041254 date of loss 10/21/15 389.27 12/15/2015 226-45122-436990
389.27Check Total:
Vendor:1297 LOCATORS & SUPPLIES INC Check Sequence: 62 ACH Enabled: False
0239170 (3) 1000/case Orange flags 287.85 12/15/2015 656-49877-421990
287.85Check Total:
Vendor:1303 M AMUNDSON LLP Check Sequence: 63 ACH Enabled: True
207575 resale - tobacco; bottle wraps; etc 260.24 12/15/2015 609-49750-425400
207575 resale -cigarettes 1,165.00 12/15/2015 609-49750-425500
1,425.24Check Total:
Vendor:3745 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY Check Sequence: 64 ACH Enabled: True
981568 (382) gal. diesel @ $1.628 621.90 12/15/2015 101-43120-421200
981568 (382) gal. diesel fees/taxes 206.40 12/15/2015 101-43120-421200
981571 (498) gal. unleaded fees/taxes 259.07 12/15/2015 101-43120-421200
981571 (498) gal. Unleaded @ $1.2693 632.11 12/15/2015 101-43120-421200
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/09/2015 - 1:46 PM)Page 9
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
1,719.48Check Total:
Vendor:1308 MARCO INC Check Sequence: 65 ACH Enabled: True
291956266 11/10-12/10/15 Contract 5,078.52 12/15/2015 702-00000-441500
5,078.52Check Total:
Vendor:1310 MASTER'S FIFTH AVE INC Check Sequence: 66 ACH Enabled: False
TIF 1-22.5 Pay as you go 2nd pmt PID's: 155.010.036130 & 155.010.036140 4,409.77 12/15/2015 213-46585-465110
4,409.77Check Total:
Vendor:4297 TIMOTHY MICHAELS Check Sequence: 67 ACH Enabled: False
12/03/2015 FiberNet acct. FNM-001-1052 Final credit 14.38 12/15/2015 656-00000-115025
14.38Check Total:
Vendor:1327 MIDSTATES EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY Check Sequence: 68 ACH Enabled: False
215862 (11,748) Maxwell Nuvo crack sealer 6,578.88 12/15/2015 101-43120-422400
6,578.88Check Total:
Vendor:1330 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS Check Sequence: 69 ACH Enabled: True
400413006500 (48) Transactions - Oct 2015 88.20 12/15/2015 101-42100-431990
88.20Check Total:
Vendor:2179 MINNESOTA 9-1-1 PROGRAM Check Sequence: 70 ACH Enabled: True
Nov- 2015 Nov. 2015 - 911 Wright Co. 760.06 12/15/2015 656-00000-208170
760.06Check Total:
Vendor:2368 JUDITH MOODY Check Sequence: 71 ACH Enabled: False
12/03/2015 FiberNet acct. 763-295-3317 final credit 68.02 12/15/2015 656-00000-115025
68.02Check Total:
Vendor:2072 NATIONAL TELCO TELEVISION CONSORTIUM Check Sequence: 72 ACH Enabled: True
3801 Nov. 2015 31,620.95 12/15/2015 656-49879-430920
31,620.95Check Total:
Vendor:2518 NEOFUNDS BY NEOPOST Check Sequence: 73 ACH Enabled: False
12/3/2015 Postage for Pkgs to Dept of Public Safety - Nov 2015 (11) 69.24 12/15/2015 217-41990-432200
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/09/2015 - 1:46 PM)Page 10
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
69.24Check Total:
Vendor:3346 OFFICEMAX Check Sequence: 74 ACH Enabled: False
994046 name badges; 12pk sharpie markers - split Fire 21.17 12/15/2015 101-42200-421990
994046 (6) Wall calendars - split PW 58.56 12/15/2015 101-43110-420990
79.73Check Total:
Vendor:1411 OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC INC Check Sequence: 75 ACH Enabled: True
52339 Labor-HWY 2 5& 4th St; Ped. Bridge@ HWY 18/94 1,016.00 12/15/2015 101-43160-431990
52339 Materials- HWY 2 5& 4th St; Ped. Bridge@ HWY 18/94 334.70 12/15/2015 101-43160-431990
52377 Material- Photo Cell Knuckle 120V 17.34 12/15/2015 101-45501-440100
52377 Labor - Photo Cell Knuckle 120V (2 hrs) 176.00 12/15/2015 101-45501-440100
52410 Materials- Fuse Holder; 600V fuse midget; etc 160.77 12/15/2015 101-43160-431990
52410 Labor- Fuse Holder; 600V fuse midget; etc 390.00 12/15/2015 101-43160-431990
52411 Material- Contractor DP 3P 120v Coil 40A 86.90 12/15/2015 101-43160-431990
52411 Labor- Contractor DP 3P 120v Coil 40A 132.00 12/15/2015 101-43160-431990
2,313.71Check Total:
Vendor:1412 OMANN BROTHERS INC Check Sequence: 76 ACH Enabled: False
12013 (2) AC Fine Mix 128.88 12/15/2015 101-43120-422400
12021 (2.02) AC Fine Mix 130.17 12/15/2015 101-43120-422400
12024 (2) AC Fine Mix 128.88 12/15/2015 101-43120-422400
12031 (2) AC Fine Mix 128.88 12/15/2015 101-43120-422400
516.81Check Total:
Vendor:2131 ONVOY LLC Check Sequence: 77 ACH Enabled: True
151202009111 Nov. 2015 Wholesale 800 Swiched 410.09 12/15/2015 656-49879-430910
151202009111 Fraud pymnt #2 of 9 -Wholesale 800 Swiched 2,072.47 12/15/2015 656-00000-202010
2,482.56Check Total:
Vendor:4040 TRACEY OTTO Check Sequence: 78 ACH Enabled: False
12/7/2015 Taught Spin Class 12/5/15 20.00 12/15/2015 226-45127-430120
20.00Check Total:
Vendor:1420 PARAMETERS LTD Check Sequence: 79 ACH Enabled: False
49155 New Workspace Design & Materials 2,161.83 12/15/2015 101-41940-424100
2,161.83Check Total:
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/09/2015 - 1:46 PM)Page 11
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:1273 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO Check Sequence: 80 ACH Enabled: False
8526276 resale - wine 3,176.94 12/15/2015 609-49750-425300
8526276 freight 46.25 12/15/2015 609-49750-433300
3,223.19Check Total:
Vendor:1424 TOM PERRAULT Check Sequence: 81 ACH Enabled: True
12/09/2015 Monticello Joint Planning Board - 2/11 & 9/9/2015 70.00 12/15/2015 101-41310-431990
70.00Check Total:
Vendor:1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO Check Sequence: 82 ACH Enabled: False
2891053 resale - liquor 665.33 12/15/2015 609-49750-425100
2891053 freight 9.12 12/15/2015 609-49750-433300
2891054 freight 51.84 12/15/2015 609-49750-433300
2891054 resale - wine 2,183.35 12/15/2015 609-49750-425300
2891054 resale - beer glasses 106.25 12/15/2015 609-49750-425400
2892890 resale -liquor 1,481.60 12/15/2015 609-49750-425100
2892890 freight 23.04 12/15/2015 609-49750-433300
2892891 freight 11.52 12/15/2015 609-49750-433300
2892891 resale - wine 412.85 12/15/2015 609-49750-425300
4,944.90Check Total:
Vendor:3743 QUALITY RV Check Sequence: 83 ACH Enabled: False
11/24/2015 ZZQLTY - Escrow Refund 770.62 12/15/2015 101-00000-220110
770.62Check Total:
Vendor:1452 RCB ASSOCIATES INC Check Sequence: 84 ACH Enabled: True
6264 DBA- 2016 Ford -Parks- Radio- Kenwood TK-760:01001208 227.80 12/15/2015 703-00000-165010
6265 DBA- Radio- Kenwood TK-760:01101399- PW 250.30 12/15/2015 101-43120-431990
478.10Check Total:
Vendor:4022 REINHART FOODSERVICE LLC Check Sequence: 85 ACH Enabled: False
175214 Freight 7.99 12/15/2015 226-45122-433300
175214 Cheese pizzas for parties 38.60 12/15/2015 226-45127-421460
175214 Resale - cookies, muffins, pizzas, hot dogs, pretzels, snacks 476.22 12/15/2015 226-45127-425410
183157 Freight 7.99 12/15/2015 226-45122-433300
183157 Capri Juice for Parties 63.70 12/15/2015 226-45127-421460
183157 Resale - chips, cheese sauce, cookies, hot dogs, pretzels, pizza 495.88 12/15/2015 226-45127-425410
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/09/2015 - 1:46 PM)Page 12
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
1,090.38Check Total:
Vendor:3279 SEAN RILEY Check Sequence: 86 ACH Enabled: False
12/09/2015 Monticello Joint Planning Board -02/11 & 9/9/2015 200.00 12/15/2015 101-41310-431990
12/09/2015 Monticello Joint Planning Board -02/11 & 9/9/2015 Travel 34.00 12/15/2015 101-41310-431990
234.00Check Total:
Vendor:1470 RUSSELL SECURITY RESOURCE INC Check Sequence: 87 ACH Enabled: True
A26054 Replace Medeco cyinder - PW 153.75 12/15/2015 601-49440-440100
153.75Check Total:
Vendor:1725 RUSSELLS OF COURSE INC Check Sequence: 88 ACH Enabled: False
11/06/2015 Wine Tasting - 11-6-2015 Catering 2,629.44 12/15/2015 609-49754-425550
2,629.44Check Total:
Vendor:1474 PATRICIA A SALZWEDEL Check Sequence: 89 ACH Enabled: True
11/24/2015 Semi Monthly Contract Payment 1,593.75 12/15/2015 101-42700-431200
1,593.75Check Total:
Vendor:2568 PATRICK A SAWATZKE Check Sequence: 90 ACH Enabled: False
12/09/2015 Monticello Joint Planning Board- 2/11 & 9/9/2015 70.00 12/15/2015 101-41310-431990
70.00Check Total:
Vendor:1490 CYNTHIA R SIMPSON Check Sequence: 91 ACH Enabled: False
894138 Nov. 2015 Cleaning Fire Dept 100.00 12/15/2015 101-42200-431990
100.00Check Total:
Vendor:1903 LINDA A SMITH Check Sequence: 92 ACH Enabled: False
TIF 1-20 Pay as you go Principal (2/2 2015) 2,214.28 12/15/2015 213-46520-465110
2,214.28Check Total:
Vendor:3309 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF MINNESOTA Check Sequence: 93 ACH Enabled: False
1353890 resale - liquor 836.51 12/15/2015 609-49750-425100
1353890 freight 10.15 12/15/2015 609-49750-433300
1353891 resale - wine 1,408.00 12/15/2015 609-49750-425300
1353891 freight 35.00 12/15/2015 609-49750-433300
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/09/2015 - 1:46 PM)Page 13
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
2,289.66Check Total:
Vendor:1499 ST CLOUD HOSPITAL Check Sequence: 94 ACH Enabled: True
TIF 1-24 Pay as you go 2nd Principal 16,330.10 12/15/2015 213-46524-465110
TIF 1-24 Pay as you go 2nd Interest 1,442.42 12/15/2015 213-46524-465110
17,772.52Check Total:
Vendor:3829 STEVE'O'SEPTIC Check Sequence: 95 ACH Enabled: True
Dec 2015 (5) Porta Toilet Rentals 323.75 12/15/2015 101-45201-431990
323.75Check Total:
Vendor:2007 BRIAN STUMPF Check Sequence: 96 ACH Enabled: False
12/09/2015 Monticello Joint Planning Board - 2/11 & 9/9/2015 70.00 12/15/2015 101-41310-431990
70.00Check Total:
Vendor:2967 SUNSET PONDS LLC Check Sequence: 97 ACH Enabled: False
11/18/2015 15D002 - Reimbursement of Escrow - Partial Reduction 29,825.00 12/15/2015 101-00000-220110
29,825.00Check Total:
Vendor:4299 JEFF SWANSON Check Sequence: 98 ACH Enabled: False
12/03/2015 FiberNet acct. FNM-001-0327 Final credit 52.88 12/15/2015 656-00000-115025
52.88Check Total:
Vendor:1516 TASC Check Sequence: 99 ACH Enabled: False
IN675975 1/1/16 - 1/31/16 Admin Fee 68.00 12/15/2015 101-49240-413500
IN675975 2016 Renewal Fee 154.00 12/15/2015 101-49240-413500
222.00Check Total:
Vendor:1518 TDS TELECOM Check Sequence: 100 ACH Enabled: True
665-837-0005 Voice - non published number charges 48.00 12/15/2015 702-00000-432100
665-838-0000 Voice - non published number charges 479.50 12/15/2015 702-00000-432100
763-271-3230 TDS 100.65 12/15/2015 702-00000-432100
763-271-3257 TDS 90.14 12/15/2015 702-00000-432100
763-295-2005 TDS 17.95 12/15/2015 702-00000-432100
763-295-3714 TDS 329.82 12/15/2015 702-00000-432100
763-295-4054 TDS 46.59 12/15/2015 702-00000-432100
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/09/2015 - 1:46 PM)Page 14
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
1,112.65Check Total:
Vendor:4305 TERRA SERVICES Check Sequence: 101 ACH Enabled: False
15480-34 Root Barrier Installed on Jason Ave 6,838.00 12/15/2015 101-45201-440910
6,838.00Check Total:
Vendor:1522 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Check Sequence: 102 ACH Enabled: True
1002996 resale - beer n/a 15.40 12/15/2015 609-49750-425400
1003032 resale -wine 100.40 12/15/2015 609-49750-425300
1003032 resale -beer 171.15 12/15/2015 609-49750-425200
992495 resale - beer 11,642.20 12/15/2015 609-49750-425200
11,929.15Check Total:
Vendor:1524 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION Check Sequence: 103 ACH Enabled: False
6000161851 Elevator Repairs Cited During Inspection 1,439.94 12/15/2015 226-45122-440100
6000161851 Elevator Repairs Cited During Inspection 1,439.94 12/15/2015 101-41941-440100
2,879.88Check Total:
Vendor:3594 TRIMARK Check Sequence: 104 ACH Enabled: False
146306 bag qt. void inv. 2496397(rebilled @ correct price)-117.06 12/15/2015 609-49754-421990
2498995 bag qt. 83.37 12/15/2015 609-49754-421990
2538514 Asst. bags; case paper twls; case cleanser 319.98 12/15/2015 609-49754-421990
2545229 Asst. bags 325.21 12/15/2015 609-49754-421990
2545229 resale - shot glass 22.35 12/15/2015 609-49750-425400
633.85Check Total:
Vendor:1532 TRUEMAN-WELTERS INC Check Sequence: 105 ACH Enabled: False
EB14933 PW- 4000 Series blade front mount; ALO weld on quick coupler 6,270.00 12/15/2015 703-00000-165010
6,270.00Check Total:
Vendor:1543 US BANK TRUST SERVICES Check Sequence: 106 ACH Enabled: False
4140337 2015B Bonds Acceptance/Paying Agent Fee 11/1/15 - 10/31/16 800.00 12/15/2015 400-43300-462030
800.00Check Total:
Vendor:1544 US POSTAL SERVICE Check Sequence: 107 ACH Enabled: False
12/7/2015 PI 42 - UB Qtr 3 Deliquent UB Billing (1,26 pcs) (1/2) 241.63 12/15/2015 601-49440-432200
12/7/2015 PI 42 - UB Qtr 3 Deliquent UB Billing (1,26 pcs) (1/2) 241.62 12/15/2015 602-49490-432200
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/09/2015 - 1:46 PM)Page 15
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
483.25Check Total:
Vendor:3057 VON HANSONS MEATS Check Sequence: 108 ACH Enabled: False
11/24/2015 ZZQLTY - Von Hanson Escrow Refund 670.62 12/15/2015 101-00000-220110
670.62Check Total:
Vendor:1561 WATER LABORATORIES INC Check Sequence: 109 ACH Enabled: False
5215 Oct. 2015 Water Testing 240.00 12/15/2015 601-49440-422740
5275 Nov. 2015 Water Testing 240.00 12/15/2015 601-49440-422740
480.00Check Total:
Vendor:4304 SHARON WERNER Check Sequence: 110 ACH Enabled: False
12/4/2015 Entertainment - Mayor's Assoc Dinner 12/16/15 - to be reimbursed 100.00 12/15/2015 101-00000-115030
100.00Check Total:
Vendor:1567 WES OLSON ELECTRIC LLC Check Sequence: 111 ACH Enabled: False
7498 Labor - 1.0 Hr Repair Wall PAC at DMV 68.00 12/15/2015 217-41990-440100
7498 Materials - Repair Wall PAC at DMV; Capacitor & Swivel Control 36.18 12/15/2015 217-41990-440100
104.18Check Total:
Vendor:1863 WEST METRO BUICK-PONTIAC-GMC INC Check Sequence: 112 ACH Enabled: False
184127 Labor - 2008 Sierra- Replc themostat & topped off 308.84 12/15/2015 656-49877-440500
184127 Parts- 2008 Sierra- Replc themostat & topped off 156.80 12/15/2015 656-49877-440500
465.64Check Total:
Vendor:1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC Check Sequence: 113 ACH Enabled: False
7058597 resale - wine 165.00 12/15/2015 609-49750-425300
7058597 freight 2.88 12/15/2015 609-49750-433300
167.88Check Total:
Vendor:1209 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA WINE & SPIRITS Check Sequence: 114 ACH Enabled: False
1080406700 resale - wine 2,216.66 12/15/2015 609-49750-425300
1080406700 resale - mix 84.00 12/15/2015 609-49750-425400
1080406700 resale - liquor 3,328.86 12/15/2015 609-49750-425100
1080406700 freight 81.41 12/15/2015 609-49750-433300
5,710.93Check Total:
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/09/2015 - 1:46 PM)Page 16
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Vendor:1577 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS - ACH Check Sequence: 115 ACH Enabled: True
December December 2015 Deputies Contract 94,170.00 12/15/2015 101-42100-430500
94,170.00Check Total:
Vendor:1581 WRIGHT CO RECORDER Check Sequence: 116 ACH Enabled: False
2015000000089 ZSPDCK - A1301534 - Conditional Use Proceed 46.00 12/15/2015 101-41910-431990
2015000000089 ZKJELL - A1301535 - Conditional Use Proceed 46.00 12/15/2015 101-41910-431990
2015000000089 ZZTACO - A1302040 - Conditional Use Proceed 46.00 12/15/2015 101-41910-431990
2015000000089 15D002 - A1302591 - Easement 46.00 12/15/2015 101-41910-431990
184.00Check Total:
Vendor:1579 WRIGHT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Check Sequence: 117 ACH Enabled: False
327 Ticket #7786- (245.95) ton Salt & 10% serv. fee 20,564.13 12/15/2015 101-43125-421700
20,564.13Check Total:
Vendor:1580 WRIGHT COUNTY JOURNAL PRESS Check Sequence: 118 ACH Enabled: False
5110783 All Wines Full Ad- 11/1 & 11/15/2015 655.60 12/15/2015 609-49754-434990
655.60Check Total:
Vendor:1584 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC Check Sequence: 119 ACH Enabled: True
01494-700 29 General WWTP - Oct 2015 994.50 12/15/2015 602-49480-430300
01494-720 28 Economic Development & Market Matching - Oct 2015 4,000.00 12/15/2015 213-46301-431990
01494-780 17 MS4/SWPPP Services - Oct 2015 539.00 12/15/2015 101-43111-430300
01494-800 22 10C009 - CSAH 75/TH 25 Intersection Improvements- Oct 2015 2,993.25 12/15/2015 400-43300-459010
01494-870 16 12C008 - Hillside Farms 3 & 4 Public Improvements- Oct 2015 241.00 12/15/2015 400-43300-459010
01494-880 17 Wellhead Protection Plan Amendment Phase 2- Oct 2015 3,084.50 12/15/2015 601-49440-430300
01494-900 10 15D001 - IRET Monticello Commerce Center 8th Addition - Oct 2015 49.00 12/15/2015 101-00000-220110
01494-940 12 BLK034 - Environmental Docs - Oct 2015 1,917.44 12/15/2015 213-46301-431990
01494-950 14 14C002 - Phosphorus Construction Phase 4 Oct 2015 21,457.50 12/15/2015 602-00000-165010
01494-950 14 14C002 - Digester Final Design Phase 6 - Oct 2015 612.00 12/15/2015 602-00000-165010
01494-950 14 14C002 - Digester Bidding Phase 7 - Oct 2015 612.00 12/15/2015 602-00000-165010
01494-950 14 14C002 - Digester Construction Admin Phase 8 - Oct 2015 7,653.00 12/15/2015 602-00000-165010
01494-960 13 14C003 - School Blvd Overlay & Trail Improvements Oct 2015 1,946.50 12/15/2015 400-43300-453010
01494-970 12 14C003 - Fallon Ave & 85th St Improvements - Oct 2015 1,577.00 12/15/2015 400-43300-453010
01494-980 12 15D002 - Sunset Ponds 3rd Addition - Oct 2015 802.50 12/15/2015 101-00000-220110
02596-010 10 General Engineering Services Phase 1 - Oct 2015 2,500.00 12/15/2015 101-43111-430300
02596-010 10 General Engineering Services Phase 1 - Oct 2015 2,500.00 12/15/2015 601-49440-430300
02596-010 10 General Engineering Services Phase 1 - Oct 2015 2,500.00 12/15/2015 602-49490-430300
02596-010 10 General Engineering Services Phase 2 - Oct 2015 200.00 12/15/2015 101-43111-430300
02596-040 10 2015 GS Support Services - Oct 2015 267.00 12/15/2015 702-00000-431990
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/09/2015 - 1:46 PM)Page 17
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
02596-100 5 15C001 PRELIM - 2016 Street Reconstruction Project - Oct 2015 37,566.75 12/15/2015 400-43300-430300
02596-110 4 ZZBCOL MASTER - BCOL Athletic Complex MP - Oct 2015 8,598.75 12/15/2015 229-45202-431990
02596-110 4 ZZBCOL MASTER - BCOL Athletic Complex MP - Oct 2015 820.00 12/15/2015 101-41910-431990
02596-130 1 ZZAUTO - Autozone Plan Review - Oct 2015 735.00 12/15/2015 101-00000-220110
104,166.69Check Total:
Vendor:1907 XO COMMUNICATIONS LLC Check Sequence: 120 ACH Enabled: True
279084624 data & internet access - 12/1-31/2015 5,230.12 12/15/2015 656-49879-430930
5,230.12Check Total:
Vendor:2076 ZAYO BANDWIDTH LLC Check Sequence: 121 ACH Enabled: True
003293 12/15 12/1-31/2015 Private Line; cost recovery surcharge 2,478.33 12/15/2015 656-49879-430910
2,478.33Check Total:
Total for Check Run:
Total of Number of Checks:
635,132.45
121
AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (12/09/2015 - 1:46 PM)Page 18
The preceeding list of bills payables was reviewed and approved for payment.
Date: 12/14/15 Approved by:________________________________________
Mayor Brian Stumpf
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
1
2B.ConsiderationofapprovingnewhiresanddeparturesforCitydepartments (TE)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
TheCouncilisaskedtoratifythehiringanddeparturesofemployeesthathaveoccurred
recentlyinthedepartmentslisted.ItisrecommendedthattheCouncilofficiallyratifythe
hiring/departureofalllistedemployeesincludingpart-timeandseasonalworkers.
A1.BudgetImpact:(positionsaregenerallyincludedinbudget)
A2.StaffWorkLoadImpact:Ifnewpositions,theremaybesometraining
involved.Ifterminatedpositions,existingstaffwouldpickupthosehours,as
needed,untilreplaced.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.Motiontoratifythehire/departuresoftheemployeesasidentifiedontheattached
list.
2.Motiontodenytherecommendedhiresanddepartures.
C.RECOMMENDATION:
BystatutetheCityCouncilhastheauthoritytoapproveallhires/departures.Citystaff
recommendsAlternative#1,fortheCounciltoapprovethehiresand/ordeparturesas
listed.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
•Listofnew/terminatedemployees
Name Title Department Hire Date Class
Scott Imdieke Streets Worker Streets 11/23/2015 Temp
Austin Johnson Parks Worker Parks 11/23/2015 Temp
Jessica Lemperes CSR- Level 2 FNM 12/8/2015 PT
Name Reason Department Last Day Class
Anna Jensen Voluntary MCC 8/13/15 PT
Amanda Campbell Voluntary MCC 11/17/15 PT
Emma Denzen Voluntary MCC 11/27/15 PT
NEW EMPLOYEES
TERMINATING EMPLOYEES
New Hire and Terms City Council 2015: 12/8/2015
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
1
2C.Considerationtoapprovethesaleordisposalofsurpluscityproperty (WO)
ThereisnoreportthisCityCouncilcycle.
City Council Agenda: 12/14/15
1
2D. Consideration to call for a special meeting on December 28th for approval of bills
(WO)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Since the City Council only meets once in December, a Special Council meeting has been
held in the past to approve one last check run for the year. This last check run is
necessary to pay vendors in a timely manner and to avoid interest charges, late fees,
and/or penalties on bills received after the December meeting and due prior to the first
meeting in January.
This special meeting could be held at the start of the day or at the end of the day. The
staff is recommending Monday, December 28th at 7:30 A.M. for this meeting.
A1. Budget Impact: By holding a special meeting, this would avoid the City
having to pay some interest or late fees on bills that would be received after the
December 14th Council meeting and due prior to the first Council meeting in
January.
A2. Staff Workload Impact: None.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to call for a Special Council Meeting on Monday, December 28, 2015 at
7:30 A.M. for the purpose of approving bills.
2. Motion for other.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The City staff supports Alternative #1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
None
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
1
2E.Considerationtoapprovethe2015RegularlyScheduledCouncilandCommission
meetings (JO/JS)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
CityCouncilisaskedtoapprovetheenclosedschedulefor2016RegularCounciland
Commissionmeetings.Thisincludesmeetingsforcommissionsandboardsthatexistby
cityordinanceorstatestatute.Thescheduleincludesadjustmentsforholidaysorother
datesrestrictedbylaw.Ifapproved,thesedatesandtimeswillbecometheofficial
meetingdatesandtimesandwillbemadeavailabletothepublic.
A1.BudgetImpact:NA
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Staffwillpostthescheduleonthecity’swebsiteand
bulletinboardafterapproval.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.Motiontoapprovethe2016RegularlyScheduledCouncilandCommission
meetingsaspresented.
2.Motiontonotapprovethe2016meetingscheduleatthistime.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1.AccordingtoMinnesotaStatutes,CityCouncil
shallkeepascheduleofitsregularmeetingdates,andtimesonfileatcityhalland
availabletothepublic.Ratherthanpublisheachindividualmeetingasitoccurs,itis
recommendedtoadoptregularmeetingdatesandtimesforCouncilandCommissions
whichisdonewiththisschedule.Theschedulewillthenbeaddedtothecity’swebsite
andofficialbulletinboard.Ifthereareanychangesorspecialmeetingswhichcomeup
duringtheyear,thosewouldbepostedaccordingtotheopenmeetinglaw.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
•Proposed2016RegularlyScheduledCouncilandCommissionmeetingcalendar
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 5 3 4 5 6
7 8 9
Primary's
10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17
18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
August 2016
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24/31 25 26 27 28 29 30
January 2016
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29
February 2016
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8
Elections
9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16
17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30
November 2016
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13
14 15 16
17 18 19 20
21 22 23
24/31 25 26 27 28 29 30
July 2016
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
April 2016
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14
15
16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30
September 2016
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12
13
14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23/30 24 25 26 27 28 29
31
October 2016
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25
26 27 28
29 30 31
May 2016
Regularly Scheduled Meetings of Council and Appointed Commissions - 2016
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14
15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
December 2016
Holiday Planning
Commission
6PM
Parks
Commission
9:15AM
Bertram
Chain of Lakes
Advisory 8AM
Library Board
5:30PM
MCC
Advisory
Industrial/
Economic
Development
Committee 7AM
City
Council
6:30PM
Transportation Advisory Committee 7:30AM
FiberNet Advisory
Board
6:30PM
Police
Advisory
Commission 7PM
Regularly scheduled meetings are sometimes rescheduled. Notice of meeting changes are posted 72 hours in advance on the Offic ial City Government bulletin board in compliance with open meeting law.
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30
June 2016
Economic
Development
Authority
6PM
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
March 2016
Fire Relief
Meeting 7PM
Personnel
Committee
7AM
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
1
2F.ConsiderationtoapproveCityFacilityBusinessHoursfor2016 (JO/JS)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
CityCouncilisaskedtoreviewtheattachedtablethatidentifieshoursofoperationand
holidayscheduleforeachcityfacilityservingthepublic.Thisscheduleisreviewed
annuallyforchangestobeapprovedbyCouncil.
Someofthehighlightsareasfollows:
•Ontheseholidays,theFiberNetOfficewillhavetheirphonelinesopenbutno
walk-inhours:DayafterThanksgiving,andDayafterChristmasDay.
•MartinLutherKingDay,PresidentsDay,andVeteransDay:DMV,LiquorStore,
andCommunityCenterareopenforvariablehoursontheseholidays.
•NewYear’sDay,MemorialDay,andLaborDay:BoththeCommunityCenter
andtheLiquorStoreareopenontheseholidays.
•IndependenceDay:TheLiquorStorewillbeopenonMonday,July4.
A1.BudgetImpact:NA
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:NA
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoapprovetheCityFacilityBusinessHoursschedulefor2016as
presented.
2.Motiontomodifythehoursofoperationinsomeothermanner.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
StaffrecommendsAlternative#1.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
•ProposedCityFacilityBusinessHoursschedulefor2016
A B C E F G H
Holiday City Hall Public Works Public Works FiberNet Office DMV Liquor Store MCC
falls on Open to Office Open Working Open to Open to Open to Open to
Standard Hours:Public to Public Hrs (Contract)Public Public Public Public
1 Standard Hours:
Monday - Friday 8am - 4:30pm 7:30am - 4pm 7:30am - 4pm 8am - 4:30pm 9am - 10pm 5am - 10pm
1 Monday-Friday 8am - 4:30pm 7:30am - 4pm 7:30am - 4pm
10am - 4pm Walk-
In Hours 8:00am - 4:30pm 9am - 10pm 5am - 10pm
2 Saturday Closed Closed Closed Closed*8am - 12pm Standard 7am - 9pm
3 Sunday Closed Closed Closed Closed*Closed Closed 7am - 9pm
4 Seasonal Hours:
(summer) May start
earlier with heat
issues
Thurs
5 New Years Eve 12/31/2015 Standard Standard Standard 9am-4:30*Standard Standard Standard
Fri
6 New Years Day 1/1/2016 Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed 9am - 6pm 7am - 9pm
Mon
7 Martin Luther King Day 1/18/2016 Closed Closed Closed Closed 8am - 12pm Standard Standard
Mon
8 Presidents Day 2/15/2016 Closed Closed Closed Closed 8am - 12pm Standard Standard
Sun
9 Easter Sunday 3/27/2016 Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed
Mon
10 Memorial Day 5/30/2016 Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed 9am - 6pm 7am - 5pm
Mon
11 Independence Day 7/4/2016 Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed 9am - 6pm Closed
Mon
12 Labor Day 9/5/2016 Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed 9am - 6pm 7am - 5pm
Mon
13 Columbus Day 10/10/2016 Standard Standard Closed Standard Standard Standard Standard
Fri
14 Veteran's Day 11/11/2016 Closed Closed Closed Closed 8am - 12pm Standard Standard
Thu
15 Thanksgiving 11/24/2016 Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed
Day After Fri 9am-4:30
16
Thanksgiving 11/25/2016 Closed Closed Standard No Walk-in
Hours*
Standard Standard Standard
Day Before Fri
Christmas Eve 12/23/2016 8am - noon 7:30-11:30am 7:30-11:30am 8am - noon 8am - noon Standard Standard
Sat
Christmas Eve 12/24/2016 Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed 9am - 4 pm 7 am - 2 pm
Sun
Christmas Day 12/25/2016 Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed Closed
Day After Mon 9am - 4:30pm
18 Christmas Day 12/26/2016 Closed Closed Closed No Walk-in Standard Standard Standard
POLICY: Modifications require Council approval. Decisions to close facilities due to inclement weather (or other reason) to be made by City Administrator
after consultation with the Department Head and Mayor.
2016 SCHEDULE OF CITY FACILITY BUSINESS HOURS (proposed)
9am - 6pm
Phones
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
1
2G.ConsiderationtoapproveResolution2015-087approvingadonationfromSchyma
PicklesandPreservesintheamountof$100fortheFarmer’sMarketadvertising
andentertainment.(KB)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
AsapartoftheFarmer’sMarket,aprogramoftheCommunityCenter’s,weoftenhave
music,demonstrationsorotherentertainmenttomaketheshoppingexperienceapleasant
one.Thevendorsofthemarketfeelstronglyenoughinthevalueofentertainmentthat
theyhavemadedonationstotheCommunityCentertohelpdefraythecost.Chris
SchymafromSchymaPicklesandPreservesismakingadonationof$100forthe
Farmer’sMarket.
Asrequiredbystatestatute,iftheCityacceptsthedonationoffunds,theCityCouncil
needstoadoptaresolutionspecifyingtheamountofthedonationanditsuse.
A1.BudgetImpact:Thedonationswillbeusedtopayforentertainmentand
advertisingfortheFarmer’sMarket.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Staffwillsearchoutandbooktheentertainmentwith
thesuggestionsortheFarmer’sMarketvendors
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.Motiontoapprovethecontributionandauthorizeuseoffundsasspecified.
2.Motiontonotapprovethecontributionandreturnthefundstothedonors.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
Staffrecommendationistoadopttheresolutionacceptingthecontributions.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
•Resolution#2015-087
City of Monticello
RESOLUTION NO. 2015-087
RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRIBUTIONS
WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is generally authorized to accept
contributions of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections
465.03 and 465.04 for the benefit of its citizens and is specifically authorized to maintain
such property for the benefit of its citizens in accordance with the terms prescribed by the
donor. Said gifts may be limited under provisions of MN Statutes Section 471.895.
WHEREAS, the following persons and or entities have offered to contribute
contributions or gifts to the City as listed:
DONOR/ENTITY DESCRIPTION VALUE
Schyma Pickles & Perserves, Chris Schyma Cash Contribution 100.00
WHEREAS, all said contributions are intended to aid the City in establishing
facilities, operations or programs within the city’s jurisdiction either alone or in
cooperation with others, as allowed by law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that it is appropriate to accept the
contributions offered.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Monticello as
follows:
1. The contributions described above are hereby accepted by the City of
Monticello.
2. The contributions described above will be used as designated by the
donor. This may entail reimbursing or allocating the money to another
entity that will utilize the funds for the following stated purpose:
DONOR/ENTITY PURPOSE/AMOUNT
Schyma Pickles & Preserves Farmer’s Market Entertainment and Demonstrations
Adopted by the City Council of Monticello this 14th day of December, 2015.
______________________________
Brian Stumpf, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________________
Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
1
2H.Considerationtoapproveapawnbrokerlicensefor2016forDavidCorbinHelm
dbaMonticelloPawn,GunandBargainCenterat1219SouthHighway25 (JS/WO)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
TheCityfirstapprovedapawnbrokerlicenseforMonticelloPawn,GunandBargain
Center2007.AtthattimetheCityalsoapprovedanoff-sitestoragefacilityat12081-
165th StreetinBecker.Theannuallicensehasbeenrenewedinsubsequentyearsunder
anothertenant.TheCouncilisaskedtoconsideranewlicenseforDavidCorbinfor
2016.
WereceivedtheapplicationfromDavidCorbinthisweekalongwiththefee.Mr.Corbin
istakingoverasthebroker.ThecitycoderequiresverificationfromtheWrightCounty
Sheriff’sDepartmentforanyissuesrelatedtotheoperationofthebusinessthatmight
impacttherenewalofthelicense.Staffisnotawareofanyissuesinthisregardandhas
senttheapplicationtoSheriffJoeHagertyforverificationandsignature.
TheCitywillbeprovidingtheMonticelloPawnShopwithaphysicallicenseafterthe
renewalisapprovedbyCouncilandtheapplicationissignedbytheSheriff.Thelicense
shouldbedisplayedattheshopinavisiblelocationasisrecommendedunderstatelaw.
A1.BudgetImpact:None
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Minimalimpactwithpreparationoftheapplicationand
license.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.Motiontoapprovetheapplicationfora2016pawnbrokerlicenseforDavid
CorbindbaasMonticelloPawn,GunandBargainCenterlocatedat1219TH25,
contingentontheapplicationreturnedfromtheSheriff’sDepartmentwithno
adversefindings.
2.Motiontonotapprovea2016pawnbrokerlicenseforMonticelloPawn,Gunand
BargainCenteratthistime.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
StaffrecommendsAlternative#1toapprovetheapplicationofthelicenseforDavid
CorbinofMonticelloPawn,GunandBargainCenterat1219TH25fortheyear2016
pendingafavorablereviewfromtheWrightCountySheriff’sOffice.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
•CopyofPawnBrokerApplication/License–DavidCorbin
•CityCodeTitleIII,Chapter15-PawnShops
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE III / Chapter 15 / Page 1
CHAPTER 15
PAWN SHOPS
SECTION:
3-15-1 Purpose
3-15-2 Definitions
3-15-3 License Required
3-15-4 Application Required
3-15-5 License Fees
3-15-6 Bond Required
3-15-7 Persons Ineligible for License
3-15-8 Records Required
3-15-9 Application Execution
3-15-10 Daily Reports to Police
3-15-11 Receipt Required
3-15-12 Redemption Period
3-15-13 Holding Period
3-15-14 Police Order to Hold Property
3-15-15 Inspection of Items
3-15-16 Label Required
3-15-17 Prohibited Acts
3-15-18 Denial, Suspension or Revocation
3-15-19 Business at Only One Place
3-15-20 Separability
3-15-1: PURPOSE. The city council finds that use of services provided by pawnbrokers
provides an opportunity for the commission of crimes and their concealment
because pawn businesses have the ability to receive and transfer property stolen by
others easily and quickly. The city council also finds that consumer protection
regulation is warranted in transactions involving pawnbrokers. The city council
further finds that the pawn industry has outgrown the city's current ability to
effectively or efficiently identify criminal activity related to pawn shops. The
purpose of this chapter is to prevent pawn businesses from being used as facilities
for the commission of crimes, and to assure that such businesses comply with basic
consumer protection standards, thereby protecting the public health, safety, and
general welfare of the citizens of the city.
To help local law enforcement better regulate current and future pawn businesses,
decrease and stabilize costs associated with the regulation of the pawn industry, and
increase identification of criminal activities in the pawn industry through the timely
collection and sharing of pawn transaction information, this chapter also
implements and establishes the required use of the Automated Pawn System (APS).
3-15-2: DEFINITIONS. When used in this article, the following words shall mean:
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE III / Chapter 15 / Page 2
Pawnbroker. A person, partnership or corporation, who lends money on the
security of pledged goods (items that are “left in pawn”), and/or purchases goods
on the condition that they may be redeemed or repurchased by the seller for a fixed
price, within a fixed period of time. To the extent that a pawnbroker' s business
includes buying personal property previously used, rented or leased, or selling it on
consignment, the provisions of this chapter shall be applicable. (#542, 1/9/12)
Reportable transaction. Every transaction conducted by a pawnbroker in which
merchandise is received through a pawn, purchase, consignment or trade, or in
which a pawn is renewed, extended or redeemed, or for which a unique transaction
number or identifier is generated by their point-of-sale software, is reportable
except:
(1) The bulk purchase or consignment of new or used merchandise from a
merchant, manufacturer or wholesaler having an established permanent
place of business, and the retail sale of said merchandise, provided the
pawnbroker must maintain a record of such purchase or consignment which
describes each item, and must mark each item in a manner which relates it
to that transaction record.
(2) Retail and wholesale sales of merchandise originally received by pawn or
purchase, and for which all applicable hold and/or redemption periods have
expired.
Billable transaction. Every reportable transaction conducted by a pawnbroker
except renewals, redemptions or extensions of existing pawns on items previously
reported and continuously in the licensee's possession is a billable transaction.
3-15-3: LICENSE REQUIRED. No person shall engage in the business of pawnbroker
at any location without a pawnbroker license for that location. No pawnbroker
license may be transferred to a different location or a different person. Issuance of
a license under this chapter shall not relieve the licensee from obtaining any other
licenses required to conduct business at the same or any other location.
3-15-4: APPLICATION REQUIRED. An application form provided by the city clerk
must be completed by every applicant for a new license or for renewal of an
existing license. Every new applicant must provide all the following information:
(1) If the applicant is a sole proprietor:
a. The name, place and date of birth, street resident address, and phone
number of applicant.
b. Whether the applicant is a citizen of the United States or resident
alien.
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE III / Chapter 15 / Page 3
c. Whether the applicant has ever used or has been known by a name
other than the applicant's name, and if so, the name or names used
and information concerning dates and places used.
d. The name of the business if it is to be conducted under a
designation, name, or style other than the name of the applicant and
a certified copy of the certificate as required by Minnesota Statutes,
Section 333.01.
e. The street address at which the applicant has lived during the
preceding five (5) years.
f. The type, name and location of every business or occupation in
which the applicant has been engaged during the preceding five (5)
years and the name(s) and address(es) of the applicant's employer(s)
and partner(s), if any, for the preceding five (5) years.
g. Whether the applicant has ever been convicted of a felony, crime, or
violation of any ordinance other than a traffic ordinance. If so, the
applicant must furnish information as to the time, place, and offense
of all such convictions.
h. If the applicant does not manage the business, the name of the
manager(s) or other person(s) in charge of the business and all
information concerning each of them required in a. through g. of
Subdivision (1) of this section.
(2) If the applicant is a partnership:
a. The name(s) and address(es) of all general and limited partners and
all information concerning each general partner required in
subdivision (1) of this section.
b. The name(s) of the managing partner(s) and the interest of each
partner in the licensed business.
c. A true copy of the partnership agreement shall be submitted with the
application. If the partnership is required to file a certificate as to a
trade name pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 333.01, a
certified copy of such certificate must be attached to the application.
(3) If the applicant is a corporation or other organization:
a. The name of the corporation or business form, and if incorporated,
the State of Incorporation.
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE III / Chapter 15 / Page 4
b. A true copy of the Certificate of Incorporation, Articles of
Incorporation or Association Agreement, and By-laws shall be
attached to the application. If the applicant is a foreign corporation,
a Certificate of Authority as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section
303.06, must be attached.
c. The name of the manager(s) or other person(s) in charge of the
business and all information concerning each manager, proprietor,
or agent required in a. through g. of Subdivision (1) of this section.
(4) For all applicants:
a. Whether the applicant holds a current pawnbroker, precious metal
dealer or secondhand goods dealer license from any other
governmental unit.
b. Whether the applicant has previously been denied, or had revoked
or suspended, a pawnbroker precious metal dealer, or secondhand
dealer license from any other governmental unit.
c. The location of the business premises.
d. Such other information as the city council or issuing authority may
require.
3-15-5: APPLICATION EXECUTION. All applications for a license under this chapter
must be signed and sworn to under oath or affirmation by the applicant. If the
application is that of a sole proprietor, it must be signed and sworn to by such
person; if that of a corporation, by an officer thereof; if that of a partnership, by one
of the general partners; and if that of an unincorporated association, by the manager
or managing officer thereof. Any falsification on a license application shall result in
the denial of a license.
3-15-6: PERSONS INELIGIBLE FOR A LICENSE. No license under this chapter will
be issued to an applicant who is a sole proprietor, a partnership if such applicant has
any general partner or managing partner, a corporation or other organization if such
applicant has any manager, proprietor or agent in charge of the business to be
licensed, if the applicant:
(1) Is a minor at the time that the application is filed;
(2) Has been convicted of any crime directly related to the occupation licensed
as prescribed by Minnesota Statutes, Section 364.03, Subd. 2, and has not
shown competent evidence of sufficient rehabilitation and present fitness to
perform the duties of a licensee under this chapter as prescribed by
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE III / Chapter 15 / Page 5
Minnesota Statutes, Section 364.03, Subd. 3; or
(3) Is not of good moral character or repute.
3-15-7: LICENSE FEES.
(A) The annual license fees for licenses issued under this chapter shall be as
adopted by the City Council. (#357, 11/27/00)
(B) The billable transaction license fee shall reflect the cost of processing
transactions and other related regulatory expenses as determined by the city
council, and shall be reviewed and adjusted, periodically. Licensees shall be
notified in writing thirty (30) days before any adjustment is implemented.
(#542, 1/9/12)
(C) Billable transaction fees shall be billed monthly and are due and payable
within thirty (30) days. Failure to do so is a violation of this chapter.
3-15-8: BOND REQUIRED. Before a license will be issued, every applicant must submit
a five thousand dollar ($5,000.00) bond on the forms provided by the licensing
authority. All bonds must be conditioned that the principal will observe all laws in
relation to pawnbrokers, and will conduct business in conformity thereto, and that
the principal will account for and deliver to any person legally entitled any goods
which have come into the principal's hand through the principal's business as a
pawnbroker, or in lieu thereof, will pay the reasonable value in money to the
person. The bond shall contain a provision that no bond may be canceled except
upon thirty (30) days written notice to the city, which shall be served upon the
licensing authority.
3-15-9: RECORDS REQUIRED. At the time of any reportable transaction other than
renewals, extensions or redemptions, every licensee must immediately record in
English the following information by using ink or other indelible medium on forms
or in a computerized record approved by local law enforcement.
1. A complete and accurate description of each item including, but not limited
to, any trademark, identification number, serial number, model number,
brand name, or other identifying mark on such an item.
2. The purchase price, amount of money loaned upon, or pledged therefore.
3. The maturity date of the transaction and the amount due, including monthly
and annual interest rates and all pawn fees and charges.
4. Date, time and place the item of property was received by the licensee, and
the unique alpha and/or numeric transaction identifier that distinguishes it
from all other transactions in the licensee's records.
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE III / Chapter 15 / Page 6
5. Full name, current residence address, current residence telephone number,
date of birth and accurate description of the person from whom the item of
property was received, including: sex, height, weight, race, color of eyes
and color of hair.
6. The identification number and state of issue from any of the following
forms of identification of the seller:
a. Current valid Minnesota driver's license.
b. Current valid Minnesota identification card.
c. Current valid photo identification card issued by another state or
province of Canada.
7. The signature of the person identified in the transaction.
8. Effective sixty (60) days from the date of notification by local law
enforcement of acceptable video standards the licensee must also take a
color photograph or color video recording of:
a. Each customer involved in a billable transaction.
b. Every item pawned or sold that does not have an unique serial or
identification number permanently engraved or affixed.
If a photograph is taken, it must be at least two (2) inches in length by two
(2) inches in width and must be maintained in such a manner that the
photograph can be readily matched and correlated with all other records of
the transaction to which they relate. Such photographs must be available
to the chief of police or the chief's designee, upon request. The major
portion of the photograph must include an identifiable front facial close-up
of the person who pawned or sold the item. Items photographed must be
accurately depicted. The licensee must inform the person that he or she is
being photographed by displaying a sign of sufficient size in a conspicuous
place in the premises. If a video photograph is taken, the video camera
must zoom in on the person pawning or selling the item so as to include an
identifiable close-up of that person's face. Items photographed by video
must be accurately depicted. Video photographs must be electronically
referenced by time and date so they can be readily matched and correlated
with all other records of the transaction to which they relate. The licensee
must inform the person orally that he or she is being videotaped and by
displaying a sign of sufficient size in a conspicuous place on the premises.
The licensee must keep the exposed videotape for three (3) months.
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE III / Chapter 15 / Page 7
9. Digitized photographs. Effective sixty (60) days from the date of
notification by local law enforcement, licensees must fulfill the color
photograph requirements in subdivision (8) by submitting them as digital
images, in a format specified by the issuing authority, electronically
cross-referenced to the reportable transaction they are associated with.
Notwithstanding the digital images may be captured from required video
recordings, this provision does not alter or amend the requirements in
subdivision (8).
10. Renewals, extensions and redemptions. For renewals, extensions and
redemptions, the licensee shall provide the original transaction identifier,
the date of the current transaction and the type of transaction.
11. Inspection of records. The records must at all reasonable times be open to
inspection by local law enforcement or state regulatory agencies. Data
entries shall be retained for at least three (3) years from the date of
transaction. Entries of required digital images shall be retained a
minimum of ninety (90) days.
3-15-10: DAILY REPORTS TO POLICE.
(A) Effective no later than sixty (60) days after local law enforcement provides
licensees with computerized record standards, licensees must submit every
reportable transaction to local law enforcement daily in the following
manner:
Licensees must provide to local law enforcement all information required in
Section 3-15-9 RECORDS REQUIRED, Subdivision (1) through (6) and
other required information by transferring it from their computer to the
Automated Pawn System via modem. All required records must be
transmitted completely and accurately after the close of business each day
in accordance with standards and procedures established by the issuing
authority. The licensee must display a sign of sufficient size, in a
conspicuous place in the premises, which informs all patrons that all
transactions are reported to local law enforcement daily.
(B) Billable transactions fees. Licensees will be charged for each billable
transaction reported to local law enforcement.
1. If a licensee is unable to successfully transfer the required reports by
modem, the licensee must provide local law enforcement printed
copies of all reportable transactions along with the video tape(s) for
that date by 12:00 the next business day.
2. If the problem is determined to be in the licensee's system and is not
corrected by the close of the first business day following the failure,
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE III / Chapter 15 / Page 8
the licensee must provide the required reports as detailed in
subdivision (B) (1), and must be charged a fifty dollar ($50.00)
reporting failure penalty, daily, until the error is corrected, or:
3. If the problem is determined to be outside the licensee's system, the
licensee must provide the required reports in subdivision (B) (1) and
resubmit all such transactions via modem when the error is
corrected.
4. If a licensee is unable to capture, digitize or transmit the
photographs required in Section 3-15-9 RECORDS REQUIRED,
Subdivision (9), the licensee must immediately take all required
photographs with a still camera, cross-reference the photographs to
the correct transaction, and make the pictures available to local law
enforcement upon request.
5. Regardless of the cause or origin of the technical problems that
prevented the licensee from uploading their reportable transactions,
upon correction of the problem, the licensee shall upload every
reportable transaction from every business day the problem had
existed.
6. Subdivision (B) (1) through (3) notwithstanding, local law
enforcement may, upon presentation of extenuating circumstances,
delay the implementation of the daily reporting penalty.
3-15-11: RECEIPT REQUIRED. Every licensee must provide a receipt to the party
identified in every reportable transaction and must maintain a duplicate of that
receipt for three (3) years. The receipt must include at least the following
information:
1. The name, address and telephone number of the licensed business.
2. The date and time the item was received by the licensee.
3. Whether the item was pawned or sold or the nature of the transaction.
4. An accurate description of each item received including, but not limited to,
any trademark, identification number, serial number, model number, brand
name or other identifying mark on such an item.
5. The signature or unique identifier of the licensee or employee that
conducted the transaction.
6. The amount advanced or paid.
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE III / Chapter 15 / Page 9
7. The monthly and annual interest rates, including all pawn fees and charges.
8. The last regular day of business by which the item must be redeemed by the
pledger without risk that the item will be sold, and the amount necessary to
redeem the pawned item on that date.
9. The full name, current residence address, current residence telephone
number and date of birth of the pledger or seller.
10. The identification number and state of issue from any of the following
forms of identification of the seller:
a. Current valid Minnesota driver's license.
b. Current valid Minnesota identification card.
c. Current valid photo driver's license or identification card issued by
another state or province of Canada.
11. Description of the pledger or seller including sex, approximate height,
weight, race, color of eyes and color of hair.
12. The signature of the pledger or seller.
13. All printed statements as required by state statute 325J.04 subdivision 2, or
any other applicable statutes.
3-15-12: REDEMPTION PERIOD.
(A) Any person pledging, pawning or depositing an item for security must have
a minimum of sixty (60) days from the date of that transaction to redeem the
item before it may be forfeited and sold. During the holding period, items
may not be removed from the licensed location except as provided in
Section 3-15-19 BUSINESS AT ONLY ONE PLACE. Licensees are
prohibited from redeeming any item to anyone other than the person to
whom the receipt was issued or, to any person identified in a written and
notarized authorization to redeem the property identified in the receipt, or to
a person identified in writing by the pledger at the time of the initial
transaction and signed by the pledger, or with approval of the police license
inspector. Written authorization for release of property to persons other
than original pledger must be maintained along with original transaction
record in accordance with Section 3-15-9 RECORDS REQUIRED,
Subdivision (10).
(B) Pawnbroker must return goods, or provide compensation for lost or
damaged goods, upon payment of the full amount due, unless:
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE III / Chapter 15 / Page 10
1. The 60-day redemption period has expired, or
2. The goods have been taken into custody by a court or by a law
enforcement officer or agency.
(#542, 1/9/12)
3-15-13: HOLDING PERIOD ON TRADE ITEMS. Any item purchased or accepted in
trade by a licensee, but not involved in a pawn transaction, must not be sold or
otherwise transferred for thirty-one (31) days from the date of the transaction. An
individual may redeem an item at any time during the holding period.
(#542, 1/9/12)
3-15-14: COURT OR POLICE ORDER TO HOLD/CONFISCATE PROPERTY.
Whenever a law enforcement official from any agency notifies a licensee not to sell
an item, the item must not be sold or removed from the premises. This initial or
investigative hold shall be confirmed in writing within seventy-two hours and
remains in effect for fifteen (15) days from the date of initial notification. Local
law enforcement may, in writing, extend an investigative hold or independently
order an item held for up to ninety (90) days, or order the confiscation of an item
identified as stole or evidence in a criminal case.
(#542, 1/9/12)
3-15-15: INSPECTION OF ITEMS. At all times during the terms of the license, the
licensee must allow law enforcement officials to enter the premises where the
licensed business is located, including all off-site storage facilities as authorized in
Section 3-15-19 BUSINESS AT ONLY ONE PLACE, during normal business
hours, except in an emergency for the purpose of inspecting such premises and
inspecting the items, ware and merchandise and records therein to verify
compliance with this chapter and other applicable laws.
3-15-16: LABEL REQUIRED. Licensee must attach a label to every item at the time it is
pawned, purchased or received in inventory from any reportable transaction.
Permanently recorded on this label must be the number or name that identifies the
transaction in the shop's records, the transaction date, the name of the item and the
description or the model and serial number of the item as reported to local law
enforcement whichever is applicable and the date the item is out of pawn or can be
sold, if applicable. Labels shall not be re-used.
3-15-17: PROHIBITED ACTS.
(A) No person under the age of eighteen (18) years may pawn or sell or attempt
to pawn or sell goods with any licensee, nor may any licensee receive any
goods from a person under the age of eighteen (18) years.
(B) No licensee may receive any goods from a person of unsound mind or an
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE III / Chapter 15 / Page 11
intoxicated person.
(C) No licensee may receive any goods, unless the seller presents identification
in the form of a valid driver's license, a valid State of Minnesota
identification card, or current valid photo driver's license or identification
card issued by the state of residency of the person from whom the item was
received.
(D) No licensee may receive any item of property that possesses an altered or
obliterated serial number or operation identification number or any item of
property that has had its serial number removed.
(E) No person may pawn, pledge, sell, consign, leave, or deposit any article of
property not their own; nor shall any person pawn, pledge, sell, consign,
leave, or deposit the property of another, whether with permission or
without; nor shall any person pawn, pledge, sell, consign, leave, or deposit
any article of property in which another person has a security interest; with
any licensee.
(F) No person seeking to pawn, pledge, sell, consign, leave, or deposit any
article of property with any licensee shall give a false or fictitious name, nor
give a false date of birth; nor give a false or out of date address of residence
or telephone number; nor present a false or altered identification, or the
identification of another; to any licensee.
3-15-18: DENIAL, SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION. Any license under this chapter
may be denied, suspended or revoked for one or more of the following reasons:
1. The proposed use does not comply with any applicable zoning code.
2. The proposed use does not comply with any health, building, building
maintenance or other provisions of this Code of Ordinances or state law.
3. The applicant or licensee has failed to comply with one or more provisions
of this chapter.
4. The applicant is not a citizen of the United States or a resident alien, or upon
whom it is impractical or impossible to conduct a background or financial
investigation due to the unavailability of information.
5. Fraud, misrepresentation or bribery in securing or renewing a license.
6. Fraud, misrepresentation or false statements made in the application and
investigation for, or in the course of, the applicant's business.
7. Violation within the preceding five (5) years, of any law relating to theft,
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE III / Chapter 15 / Page 12
damage or trespass to property, sale of a controlled substance, or operation
of a business.
8. The owner of the premises licensed or to be licensed would not qualify for a
license under the terms of this chapter.
3-15-19: BUSINESS AT ONLY ONE PLACE. A license under this chapter authorizes
the licensee to carry on its business only at the permanent place of business
designated in the license. However, upon written request, the police inspector
may approve an off-site locked and secured storage facility. The licensee shall
permit inspection of the facility in accordance with Section 3-15-15 INSPECTION
OF ITEMS. All provisions of this chapter regarding record keeping and reporting
apply to the facility and its contents. Property shall be stored in compliance with
all provisions of the city code. The licensee must either own the building in which
the business is conducted, and any approved off-site storage facility, or have a lease
on the business premise that extends for more than six (6) months.
3-15-20: SEPARABILITY. Should any section, subsection, clause or other provision of
this chapter be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole or any part other
than the part so declared invalid.
(#356, 10/10/00)
(#542, 1/9/12)
CityCouncilAgenda–12/14/2015
1
2I.ConsiderationtoapproveanamendmenttoaConditionalUsePermitforaPlanned
UnitDevelopmentfortheMonticelloBigLakeCommunityHospitalDistrict
Campus(CentraCareHealthMonticello)forthecontinueduseofanaccessory
heliport.Applicant:CentraCareHealthSystem,(NAC)
Property:Legal:Lot1,Block1,Monticello-BigLake
CommunityHospitalDistrictCampus,
2nd Addition
Address:1013HartBoulevard
PlanningCaseNumber:ZZHELI
A.REFERENCE&BACKGROUND
Request(s):Re-approvalofa2013temporarypermittoallowthe
locationoftheheliportservingtheCentraCareHealth
facility.
DeadlineforDecision:December21,2015
LandUseDesignation:PlacesforCommunity
ZoningDesignation:B-2,LimitedBusinessDistrict
Thepurposeofthe“B-2”limitedbusinessdistrictisto
provideforlowintensityretailorserviceoutletswhich
dealdirectlywiththecustomerforwhomthegoodsor
servicesarefurnished.Theusesallowedinthisdistrict
aretoprovidegoodsandservicesonalimited
communitymarketscaleandlocatedinareaswhichare
wellservedbycollectororarterialstreetfacilitiesatthe
edgeofresidentialdistricts.
Overlays/Environmental
RegulationsApplicable:WildandScenic,RecreationalRiverDistrict
CurrentSiteUse:HospitalParkingLot/Heliport
SurroundingLandUses:
North:EllisonPark/MississippiRiver
East:Clinic/SeniorHousing
South:MiddleSchool
West:SingleFamilyResidential
CityCouncilAgenda–12/14/2015
2
ProjectDescription:Extensionofthetemporaryuseofthehospitalparking
lotareaforoccasionalmedicalhelicopteroperations.
Thelocationisproposedtocontinuetocomplywith
FAArequirementsforflightpathandotherlocational
factorsthatmadethepreviouslocationnearthehospital
entrancenolongercompliant.Twoalternative
arrival/departurepathsarerequiredbyFAAtopermit
thelocation.Theextendedtemporaryperiodforthis
locationisrequestedforuptofiveadditionalyears.
ANALYSIS
ThezoningordinanceallowsclinicsandhospitalsaspermittedusesintheB-2zoning
district.Theheliportisanintegralaccessoryuseforthehospital,butrequiresan
amendmenttothePUDapprovalforthehospitalcampus,approvedpreviouslyby
ConditionalUsePermit.
Theapplicantsoriginallyrequestedthisrelocationin2013,whentheybecameaware
thatthepreviouslocationwasoutofcompliancewithFAArequirements.TheCity
approvedanamendmenttothePUDforatwo-yeartemporaryperiod,duringwhich
timetheCentraCareadministrationindicatedtheywouldbelookingforapermanent
sitefortheheliport.
Thetemporarysiteislocatedinthewestendoftheparkinglot,anareaimproved
withrequiredflightmarkingsandsafetycones.
FlightOperations.Theapplicantsindicatethattheirhistoryindicates0–3transfers
permonthrequiringhelicoptertransport.Theoperationsoccuroveroneoftwoflight
paths.Onepathextendstothenortheast,onabearingof035degrees,overEllison
ParkandtheMississippiRiver.Thesecondpathextendstothesoutheastgenerally
alongthelineofCountyHighway75(Broadway).
Parking.ThehospitalPUDincludesacrossparkingagreementwiththeMiddle
School,southoftheCountyHighway75.Thehelipadwillconsumesomeofthe
existingparkingduringtheinterimperiod,however,itisthewestern-mostparking
thatisoftennotutilized.
Thetemporarynatureofthepermitisintendedtoallowthehospitaltofindasuitable
permanentlocationandmaketherequiredimprovements.Theapplicantwasnotable
toaccomplishthisduringtheinitialtwo-yeartimeperiod.Theapplicantsindicate
thattheyhavenotexperiencednegativeparkingimpactsfortheirstaff,patients,
visitors,orthecommunity.
Lighting.Thehelipadislocatedinalightedparkinglot.Atthetimeoftheoriginal
permit,someoftheparkinglotlightsneededtoberemovedtoaccommodatethe
approach/departurepaths.Thehelipaditselfwillhasaeronauticlightingrequirements
dictatedbyFAArequirements–thoseareilluminatedduringoperations.
CityCouncilAgenda–12/14/2015
3
Signage.Nofurtherchangestositesignageareanticipatedasaresultofthehelipad
relocation,outsideofdirectionalandsafetymessaging.
AccessandCirculation.Changestocirculationintheparkinglotoccurasaresultof
theproject.Portionsoftheparkinglothavebeendemarcatedforclosure,leaving
parkinglotcirculationonlyaroundthesouthandwestsidesofthehelipad.
Other.NoimpactsfromthisprojectareexpectedforBuildingDesign,Gradingand
Drainage,orUtilities.
PlanningCommissionRecommendation
ThePlanningCommissionreviewedthisitemonDecember1st,2015andhelda
publichearingontherequest.OtherthanarepresentativefromCentraCareHealth
Monticello,nopublicwaspresenttoprovidetestimony.
ThePlanningCommissioninquiredaswhetherthehospitalisconsideringanalternate
permanentlocationofthehelipad.CentraCareindicatedthatatthistime,thehospital
continuestoevaluatecurrentandfuturesiteimprovements,andassuchapermanent
locationplanisunknown.Thefive-yeartimeframeidentifiedintheCUPallowsthe
hospitaltocontinuetoevaluateoptions.TheCommissionalsonotedthatcomplaints
hadbeenregisteredatthehospitalorCityregardingthecurrenthelipadlocationand
transportservices.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS
ThePlanningCommissionunanimouslyrecommendsalternative1.
1.Motiontoapprove anamendmenttoconditionalusepermitfor plannedunit
developmentfortheMonticello-BigLakeCommunityHospital(CentraCare
Health),approvingatemporaryrelocationoftheheliportfacility,basedon
findingsinResolutionPC-2015-019andsubjecttothoseconditionsinExhibitZ.
2.Motiontodenyapprovalofanamendmenttoconditionalusepermitforplanned
unitdevelopmentfortheMonticello-BigLakeCommunityHospital(CentraCare
Health),approvingatemporaryrelocationoftheheliportfacilitybasedon
findingstobemadebytheCityCouncil.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION
StaffrecommendsapprovalofthetemporaryextensionofthePUDamendmentto
accommodatetheheliportlocationinthewestparkinglotforaperiodofuptofive
years.Asnotedbytheapplicant,nonegativeparkingimpactshavebeenobserved
duringtheinitialtwo-yearperiod.However,theapplicantshouldactivelypursuea
permanentsolutioninanticipationoftheeventualneedtore-occupythesubjectsite
forparking.Intheeventthatparkingbecomesanissuebeforetheendofthefive-
yearperiod,theapplicantsshouldbepreparedtoinstallapermanentfacility.
CityCouncilAgenda–12/14/2015
4
D.SUPPORTINGDATA
•ExhibitZ–ConditionsofApproval
•ResolutionPC-2015-019
•AerialImage
•OfficialZoningMap
•ApplicantNarrative
•ApplicationSitePlans
•FlightPathInformation
•SoundLevelInformation
EXHIBITZ
AmendmenttoConditionalUsePermitfor
PlannedUnitDevelopment
1013HartBoulevard
Lot1,Block1,
Monticello-BigLakeCommunityHospitalDistrictCampus
2nd Addition
.
1.ThePUDamendmentshallbevalidforaperiodequaltothelesserof:
a.FiveYears;or
b.NotificationfromtheCityofMonticellothatparkingand/orcirculation
congestiononthesiterequiresapermanentrelocationoftheheliport
improvements.
2.Theapplicantsshallenterintoadevelopmentagreementortemporaryuseagreement
specifyingthetimelimitsnotedabove.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. PC-2015-019
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE
MONTICELLO-BIG LAKE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL (CENTRACARE HEALTH),
APPROVING A TEMPORARY RELOCATION OF THE HELIPORT FACILITY
1013 Hart Boulevard
Lot 1, Block 1, Monticello-Big Lake Community Hospital District Campus, 2nd Addition
WHEREAS, the property owner Monticello-Big Lake Community Hospital District, as
applicant, has requested an amendment to its Planned Unit Development; and
WHEREAS, said property is currently zoned B-2, Limited Business District; and
WHEREAS, the amendment provides a temporary location for an accessory helicopter pad;
and
WHEREAS, the relocation had been required under Federal Aviation Administration rules
for safe and proper emergency flight operations; and
WHEREAS, the use of the helipad is a vital and important aspect of hospital operations for
public health and safety; and
WHEREAS, the relocation is temporary, pending a permanent location on the site; and
WHEREAS, the facility creates no additional burdens on other infrastructure or public safety
conditions in the area; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has conducted a public hearing on December 1, 2015
to review the request and receive public comment on the amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff
report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello finds:
1. That the proposed uses of the property will be consistent with the intent of the
Comprehensive land use plan and proposed zoning district; and
2. No negative impacts on parking have been observed during the initial temporary
permit period; and
3. The PUD amendment approved hereby shall terminate in five years, or when parking
and/or circulations conflicts become an issue for the site or neighborhood; and
4. The applicant has met the requirements for a Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit
Development.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. PC-2015-019
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota:
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit for
a Planned Unit Development, for a period to terminate on December 31, 2020, subject to amendment
by the City Council. This recommendations is subject to the following conditions:
1. The PUD amendment shall be valid for a period equal to the lesser of:
a. Five Years; or
b. Notification from the City of Monticello that parking and/or circulation
congestion on the site requires a permanent relocation of the heliport
improvements.
2. The applicants shall enter into a development agreement or temporary use agreement
specifying the time limits noted above.
ADOPTED this 1st day of December, 2015 by the Planning Commission of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota.
MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
By: _______________________________
Brad Fyle, Chair
ATTEST:
____________________________________________
Angela Schumann, Community Development Director
Amend CUP for PUD for Co ntin ued Use o f R eloca ted Accesso ry Use H elip ort
Lot 1, Block 1, MBL Community Hospital District Second Addition, 1013 Hart Blvd, PID 155208001010
County Hwy 75
Chelsea Rd
State Hwy 25
85th St NE
9 0th St N E
Linn St
Pine St
7th St
School Blvd
Riverview Dr
Cedar St
W River St
M
a
r
v
i
n
R
d
Jason Ave
Dundas Rd
W Broadway St
Hart Blvd
Country La
Haug Ave NE
Elm St
W 4th St
Fenning Ave NE
Oakwook Dr
Ma ll a r d L a
95th St NE
Fallon Ave NE
Edmonson Ave NE
Mississippi Dr
5th St
Country Club Rd
Sandberg Rd
P
e
l
i
c
a
n
L
a
F a l c o n D r
Fenning Ave
Walnut St
Oak Ridge Dr
Oriole La
Club View Rd
Broadway St
Hillcrest Rd
E River St
Headman La
M
i
l
l
T
r
a
i
l
L
a
Falcon Ave NE
Wright StBenton St
Elwood Rd
Ramsey St
6th St
River Mill Dr
Wildwood Way
Hilltop Dr
Mill Run Rd
O a k V i e w L a
Farmstead Ave
Martin Dr
4th St E
3rd St E
Red Rock La
Gillard Ave NE
Maple St
Fallon Dr
Willow St
View La E
Grey Stone Ave
Marvin Elwood Rd
Fieldcrest Cir
Fairway Dr
Jason Ave NE
Vine St
M e a d o w L a
Jerry Liefert Dr
Praire Rd
Starling Dr
Palm St
Un
kn
ow
n
o
r N
o
S
tree
tn
ame
Fallon Ave
Golf Course Rd
Falcon Ave
Kevin Longley Dr
Craig La
R
e
d
O
a
k
L
a
Front St
5th St W
Thomas Park D r
Locust St
M o c k i n g b i r d L a
W 3rd St
Ea
s
two
o
d
C
i
r
Bri ar Oa ks Bl v d
F
a
r
m
s
t
e
a
d
D
r
Henipin St
E
i
d
e
r
L
a
Dayton St
Oak La
River Forest Dr
Meadow Oak Ave
Kampa Cir
O
a
k
R
i
d
g
e
C
i
r
M i l l C t
R i v e r R i d ge L a
Garrison Ave
Oakview Ct
Dundas Cir
Kenneth La
Otter Creek Rd
Minnesota St
Eagle Cir
Crocus La
Meadow Oak La
Stone Ridge Dr
Chestnut St
1 2 0 t h S t N E
Darrow Ave NE
Diamond Dr
Pebble Brook Dr
Widgeon La
Washington St
Bunker Cir
Homestead Dr
Thomas Cir
E
n
d
i
c
o
t
t
T
r
Center Cir
Oak View Cir
Sandtrap Cir
Countr y Cir
Cheyen Ct
Old Territoral Rd
Tanager Cir
Hillcrest Cir
Os prey Ct
Acorn Cir
Balboul Cir
S
w
allo
w
C
ir
R iv e r si d e C ir
Meadow Oak Ct
Matthew Cir
E Oak Dr
S t o n e R i d g e C ir
Oakwood Dr
Meadow Oak Ave NE County Hwy 75
Hart Blvd
Marvin Rd
Marvin Rd
Wright St
90th St NE
Cedar St
Minnesota St
01
City of MonticelloOfficial Zoning Map
10-10-14
:Legend
BASE ZONING DISTRICTS
Residential Districts
-- Low Residential Densities
-- Medium Residential Densities
-- High Residential De nsities
Business Districts
Industrial Districts
OTHER
Water
A-O
R-A
R-1
T-N
R-2
R-PUD
R-3
R-4
B-1
B-2
B-3
B-4
CCD
IBC
I-1
I-2
M-H
Mississippi Wild, Scenic & Rec Overlay District
OVERLAY DISTRICTS
Performance Based Overlay District
!
!
!
!!!!
!
!
!!!!!
Shoreland District
Special Use Overlay District
!
!
!
!!!!
!
!
!!!!!
Freeway Bonus Sign District
PUDs
Swan River01
CityofMonticello
CommunityDevelopment
505WalnutStreet
Monticello,MN55362
CouncilMembers:
CentraCareHealth-Monticelloisrequestinganextensionofourconditionalusepermitforfive(5)
additionalyears.Thetemporaryhelipadremainslocatedinthewestparkinglot.Seeattached
documentationforareacalculationsandlayouts.Allsiteplansandsupplementaldocumentationsubmitted
in2013remainaccurateandapplicable.Therehasbeennoimpactingoftherightofwayorwetlandareas.
OurexistingzoningisB2andweareaPlannedUnitDevelopmentasshownonthesiteplan.
Thelast2yearshaveshownthefrequencyoflandingsisvariable,withtherebeinganywherefrom0-3
transfersamonth.Therehavebeennocomplaintsorconcernsvoicedbyourneighborsovernoiselevels.
Therehasbeennonegativeimpactonparkingforourpatients,visitors,staff,andcommunityeventsor
afterhour/weekendschoolevents.
ProvidingairtransportforthepatientsweserveisveryimportanttoCentraCareHealth-Monticello.We
askthatyouextendthetemporarypermitsowecancontinueprovidingairtransporttoourcritical
patients.
Iwillbepresentatthemeetingstoaddressanyquestionsorconcernsyoumayhaveinregardstothis
request.
Sincerely,
MaryLanegran
DirectorofFacilities
CentraCareHealth-Monticello
CentraCare Health-Monticello45 x 45 TLOF D=46
9
8
7
6 5
3 2
1
4
25
11
18
1617
15
14
13 12
10
22
21
2019
23
24
²0 150 30075Feet
Legend
DRemove
XWObstr Light
GFPad_Ctr
nmWindsock
Object
!.Non-Penetrating
Penet rat ions
!.Appr/Dep Obstr
!.FATO Obstruction
!.Lighting Reqd
!.Transitional Obstr
!.Safety Area Obstr
Pwr_Line
TLOF
FATO
Appr Surf
Safety Area
035 ARC clockwise to 085 is clear
035
135
120' Comm tower
old closed pad
085
CentraCare Health-Monticello45 x 45 TLOF D=46²0 790 1,580395Feet
Legend
XWObstr Light
nmWindsock
Pwr_Line
TLOF
FATO
Appr Surf
Safety Area
035 ARC clockwise to 085 is clear
035
135
Comm tower
085
Comm tower
Survey Heliport Data Report
Facility Name:CentraCare Health-Monticello City Name:Monticello
HMONFAA Identifier:FAA Site Nbr:343*H
0Appr Direction:
Object Evaluation
Obj
Nbr
Object
Type HeightLighted Object Notes
Dist
into
Appr
Dist
from
CtrLn
Dist
into
Trans
Hgt
of
Surf
Pene
in
Feet Slope
80Primary Surface Width:
15Safety Area Width:
Approach Obstruction12Tree43No No Fly2800.0 3.5 39.5 0.65
Approach Obstruction13Tree37No No Fly10800.0 13.5 23.5 2.92
Approach Obstruction14Tree45No No Fly15100.0 18.9 26.1 3.36
Approach Obstruction15Light Pole 29Yes No Fly9300.0 11.6 17.4 3.21
Approach Obstruction17Tree44No No Fly11500.0 14.4 29.6 2.61
Thursday, August 22, 2013 Page 1 of 3
Facility Name:CentraCare Health-Monticello City Name:Monticello
35Appr Direction:
Object Evaluation
Obj
Nbr
Object
Type HeightLighted Object Notes
Dist
into
Appr
Dist
from
CtrLn
Dist
into
Trans
Hgt
of
Surf
Pene
in
Feet Slope
80Primary Surface Width:
15Safety Area Width:
Approach Obstruction22Tree18No Topped 5' slope 11:1141380.0 17.6 0.4 7.83
Non-Penetrating Object18Tree46No2459643.1 52.2 0.0 2.81
Non-Penetrating Object19Tree13No161410.0 20.1 0.0 12.38
Non-Penetrating Object20Tree13No16520.0 20.6 0.0 12.69
Non-Penetrating Object21Tree20No253410.0 31.6 0.0 12.65
Non-Penetrating Object23Tree38No Direct Slope 11.9:145300.0 56.6 0.0 11.92
Non-Penetrating Object24Tree37No Direct Slope 9.7:1360360301.1 195.6 0.0 -37.64
Transitional Obstruction16Light Pole 29Yes 18 49 8.1 6.3 22.7 0.30
85Appr Direction:
Object Evaluation
Obj
Nbr
Object
Type HeightLighted Object Notes
Dist
into
Appr
Dist
from
CtrLn
Dist
into
Trans
Hgt
of
Surf
Pene
in
Feet Slope
80Primary Surface Width:
15Safety Area Width:
Non-Penetrating Object1Tree37No53400.0 66.8 0.0 14.43
Non-Penetrating Object2Tree26No3427517.0 51.3 0.0 -1.02
Thursday, August 22, 2013 Page 2 of 3
Facility Name:CentraCare Health-Monticello City Name:Monticello
135Appr Direction:
Object Evaluation
Obj
Nbr
Object
Type HeightLighted Object Notes
Dist
into
Appr
Dist
from
CtrLn
Dist
into
Trans
Hgt
of
Surf
Pene
in
Feet Slope
80Primary Surface Width:
15Safety Area Width:
Non-Penetrating Object3Light Pole 23Yes 178 122 72.7 58.6 0.0 72.66
Non-Penetrating Object4Tree46No28415095.1 83.0 0.0 9.06
Non-Penetrating Object5Light Pole 37Yes 413 133 71.3 87.3 0.0 -4.88
Non-Penetrating Object6Light Pole 26Yes 348 35 0.0 43.5 0.0 13.38
Non-Penetrating Object7Light Pole 34Yes 461 2 0.0 57.6 0.0 13.56
Non-Penetrating Object8Light Pole 27Yes 238 50 0.0 29.8 -2.8 8.81
Non-Penetrating Object9Light Pole 30Yes 287 86 30.9 51.3 0.0 -5.27
Non-Penetrating Object10Power Line 30No Has marker balls23810148.5 54.0 0.0 48.51
Non-Penetrating Object11Light Pole 32Yes 88 100 55.4 38.7 0.0 2.64
Non-Penetrating Object25Comm Twr 118Yes antenna970192101.1 171.8 0.0 -31.10
Thursday, August 22, 2013 Page 3 of 3
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
2J.ConsiderationtoapprovetheSecondAmendmenttoDevelopmentContractfor
AMAXAddition.(AS)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
TheCityCouncilisaskedtoapproveasecondamendmenttodevelopmentcontractas
relatedtothedevelopmentofLot1,Block1,AMAXAddition.
TheCityhasreceivedasiteplanapplicationforaproposedAutoZoneretailstoreatthe
site,whichislocatedatthecornerofCedarStreetandDundasRoad.Theretailuseis
consideredpermittedintheB-3(HighwayBusiness)Districtinwhichthepropertyis
located.Noassociatedaccessoryautorepairoroutdoorstorageusesareproposed.Site
planreviewisanadministrativelanduseapplicationandhasbeencompleted.The
developerhassubmittedrevisedplandrawingsmeetingstaffcomments.Siteplan
approvalforthesubjectdevelopmentiscontingentontheapproval,executionand
recordingoftheproposedcontractamendment.
Noconditionalusepermitorvariancewasfoundtoberequiredduringthesiteplanreview
process.Thesubjectpropertywaspreviouslyplattedasalotandincludesallrequired
publiceasements,sonoadditionalplattingactionisrequired.AlthoughtheGoodwillretail
storeapprovalincludedaconditionalusepermitwhichallowedforpotentialofashared
accessalongCedarStreetwiththisproperty,thedeveloperofthesubjectsiteprefersto
maintainseparateaccesspoints.Therefore,accesstothesitewillnotbesharedwith
Goodwill.TheCityEngineerhasreviewedthethreeaccesspointsproposedforthesubject
development.
PertheoriginaldevelopmentcontractfortheAMAXAddition,anyassignmentofcontract
ordevelopmentwithintheplatrequiresanamendmenttothecontract.Afirstamendment
wascompletedin2014whenAMAXstorage,ownerofLot2,Block1,completedan
expansiononitsexistingsitefortemporarystoragecontainers.TheCityactedtoremove
Lot1,Block1fromtheAMAXAdditionplannedunitdevelopmentin2008,andassuch,
noamendmenttotheAMAXPUDisrequired.
Intermsoftheamendmentdocument,thecontractprovidesforthecompletionofpublic
sidewalksalongCedarStreetandDundasRoad.Theagreementrequiresaletterofcredit
tosecuretheseimprovementsandrequiredsitelandscaping.Inaddition,theagreement
requirescompliancewithCitypermittinganderosioncontrolregulations.Theagreement
specifiestherequiredtrunkareacharges,whichwillbepaidatthetimeofbuildingpermit.
TheagreementwillbeexecutedbyAutoZoneatsuchtimeasitownstheproperty,but
priortoanydevelopmentonLot1,Block1.
A1.BudgetImpact:None.Thecontractrequiresthatthedeveloperprovideacash
securitytocoverthelegalcostsincurredfordevelopmentofthecontractamendment.
A2.StaffImpact:Approximately3hoursofstafftimeonthepartoftheCityEngineer
andCommunityDevelopmentDirectorwasspentinpreparingandreviewing
informationrelatedtothecontractamendment.
EDAAgenda:11/18/15
2
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoapprovetheSecondAmendmenttoDevelopmentContractforAMAX
Addition.
2.Motionofother.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
StaffrecommendsAlternative#1.Theamendmenttodevelopmentcontractprovidesthe
necessarydevelopmentrequirementsforthesubjectsite,includingsecurities,fees,plan
andpermitrequirements.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
•SecondAmendmenttoDevelopmentContract–AMAXAddition
•SitePlans,ProposedAutoZone
1
(reserved for recording information)
SECOND AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
AMAX ADDITION
AGREEMENT dated December 14th, 2015, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a
Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”), a Minnesota limited liability company and AutoZone Parts
Inc, a ___________________(the “Developer”).
1. BACKGROUND. The City and Developer’s predecessor in interest, Amax Self Storage,
LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company previously entered into that certain Development Contract for
AMAX ADDITION dated July 8th, 2008, (the “Agreement”) in connection with the platting of certain
land situated in the City of Monticello, County of Wright, State of Minnesota, legally described as set
forth in the Plat of AMAX ADDITION, (hereinafter the “subject property”) and as amended by the First
Amendment to Development Contact dated August 28th, 2104.
2. AMENDMENT. Except as specifically modified by this Agreement, the Development
Contract for AMAX ADDITION shall remain in full force and effect.
2
3. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following
plans, approved as part of the City’s required Site Plan application review. The plans shall not be attached to
this Contract. With the exception of Plan A, the plans may be prepared, subject to the City Engineer’s
approval, after entering the Contract, but before commencement of any work in the plat. If the plans vary
from the written terms of this Contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are:
Plan A - Final Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan, dated _____
Plan B - Plans and Specifications for Public Improvements, dated _____
Plan C - Landscape Plan, dated ____
4. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall install and pay for the following
according to City requirements on Lot 1, Block 1, AMAX ADDITION:
a. Public Sidewalk, Cedar Street
b. Public Sidewalk, Dundas Road
c. Pavement Marking revisions on Dundas Road
The improvements shall be installed in accordance with the City subdivision ordinances in effect as of the date of this
Agreement; City standard specifications for utilities and street construction in effect as of the date of this Agreement;
and any other ordinances in effect as of the date of this Agreement. Developer shall submit plans and specifications
which have been prepared by a competent registered professional engineer to the City for approval by the City
Engineer, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. The City may, at the City's
discretion and at Developer’s expense, have one or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a full
or part-time basis, and the costs and expenses thereof shall be included in the fees set forth in Section 19. Developer,
its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City's inspectors, although the City’s
inspectors shall in good faith work with Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, to discuss and reach agreement
on all such instructions prior to implementation. Developer’s engineer shall provide for on-site project management.
Developer's engineer is responsible for design changes and contract administration Developer's contractor. Developer
or its engineer shall schedule a pre-construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at City Hall with all parties
concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. Within thirty (30) days after the
3
completion of the improvements and before the security is released, Developer shall supply the City with a complete
set of reproducible "as constructed" plans, an electronic file of the "as constructed" plans in an auto CAD.DWG file or
a .DXF file, and two complete sets of blue line "as constructed" plans, all prepared in accordance with City standards.
5. SITE IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall install and pay for the following on Lot 1, Block 1,
according to City requirements:
A. Signage and Parking Spaces
B. Site Grading and Erosion Control
C. Private Underground Utilities
D. Surveying and Staking
E. Landscaping
F. Permits
6. PERMITS. Developer shall obtain or require its contractors and subcontractors to obtain all
necessary permits, prior to commencing construction, including but not limited to:
Wright County for County Road Access and Work in County Rights-of-Way
Minnesota Department of Health for Watermains
NPDES Permit for Stormwater Connections
MPCA for Sanitary Sewer and Hazardous Material Removal and Disposal
DNR for Dewatering
City of Monticello for Building Permits
City of Monticello for Grading Permits
City of Monticello for Right of Way Permit
7. DEWATERING. Due to the variable nature of groundwater levels and stormwater flows, it will
be Developer’s and Developer’s contractors and subcontractors responsibility to satisfy themselves with regard to
the elevation of groundwater in the area and the level of effort needed to perform dewatering and storm flow
routing operations. All dewatering shall be in accordance with all applicable county, state, and federal rules and
regulations. DNR regulations regarding appropriations permits shall also be strictly followed.
8. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install all required public improvements by
November 30, 2016. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is
granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the
extended completion date.
4
9. LICENSE. Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a non-
exclusive license to enter the platted property (including dedicated easements) to perform all work and inspections
deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with plat development.
10. EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL. Prior to initiating site grading, the erosion/sediment
control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented by Developer and inspected and approved by the City, which approval
shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. The City may impose additional erosion/sediment control
and storm water requirements if required by law. Soil stabilization shall be initiated immediately to limit soil erosion
but in no case completed later than seven (7) days after construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarily
or permanently ceased. Seeding shall be in accordance with the City’s current seeding specification, except as
otherwise provided in the erosion control plan. Seeding may include certified oat seed to provide a temporary ground
cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be maintained as necessary for seed retention. All sediment
control standards shall be developed in accordance with the City’s Zoning Ordinance to ensure proper BMPs are in
place to prevent sediment from leaving the project site and entering the receiving water bodies.
11. GRADING PLAN AND CERTIFICATION. The plat shall be graded in accordance with the
approved grading plan, stormwater control measures and erosion control plan as set forth in Plan B. The plan shall
conform to City of Monticello specifications. Developer shall provide the City with the "as-built" grading plan and
will include a certification that the grading following construction activities has been undisturbed or has been returned
to the state required in the grading plan.
12. CLEAN UP. The Developer shall clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from
construction work by the Developer, subcontractors, their agents or assigns. Prior to any construction in the plat, the
Developer shall identify in writing a responsible party and schedule for erosion control, street cleaning, and street
sweeping. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. The Developer shall pay a penalty
of $100.00 a day for each calendar day that the streets are not cleaned in accordance with this paragraph. If the
Developer repeatedly fails to clean streets in accordance with this paragraph, the City may, in its discretion, perform the
work or contract to have the work completed and bill the costs to the Developer. The City will endeavor to notify the
5
Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's
rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such
work within ten (10) days from the date notice of the amount owed to the City is mailed, the City may draw down the
Irrevocable Letter of Credit to pay any costs. No development, utility or street construction will be allowed and no
building permits will be issued unless the Plat is in full compliance with the requirements of this Paragraph.
13. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction
required by this Agreement, the improvements lying within public easements shall become City property without
further notice or action.
14. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. Developer represents to the City
that the proposed development complies with all applicable City, County, State, and Federal laws and regulations.
Developer agrees to comply with such laws and regulations.
15. CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION
OBSERVATION. Developer shall pay a fee for engineering administration and construction
observation/monitoring of the public improvements and grading, erosion control and restoration. A deposit of $2,000,
is required to cover the cost of engineering services provided by the City’s consultants and City inspection services.
This amount covers the following: Grading and storm sewer plan review and project administration, monitoring of
construction observation, consultation with Developer and his engineer on status or problems regarding the project,
coordination for final inspection and acceptance, project monitoring during the warranty period, and processing of
requests for reduction in security. Also included in the deposit is the cost of construction observation performed by the
City's in-house engineering staff or consulting engineer. Construction observation shall include part or full time
inspection of storm sewer and erosion control/restoration construction and will be billed on hourly rates. Upon
completion of the project this amount shall be reconciled against actual City costs.
16. STORM SEWER AREA CHARGE. The Development is subject to a storm sewer area
charge of $17,998.92. The area charge is based on the gross area of the platted lot less any area credit for pond area,
and is calculated as follows:
6
1.73 net acres X $10,404 ($3,407 base storm water area charge + $6,997 alternative ponding area
charge, 2015 rate) = $17,998.92
The City’s alternate ponding area charge is also applicable as the Developer is not providing ponding on-site. The
total storm sewer area charge for the Development of $17,998.92 shall be paid by the Developer in cash prior to the
issuance of abuilding permit.
17. SANITARY SEWER AREA CHARGE. The Development is subject to a sanitary sewer area
charge of $5,515.24. The area charge is based on the gross area of the final plat and is calculated as follows:
1.73 acres x $3,188/acre = $5,515.24
The total sanitary sewer area charge for the Development of $5,515.24 shall be paid by the Developer in cash prior
to the issuance of a building permit.
18. WATER MAIN AREA CHARGE. The Development is subject to a water main area charge of
$4,079.34. The area charge is based on the gross area of the final plat and is calculated as follows:
1.73 gross acres x $2,358 = $4.079.34
The total watermain area charge for the Development of $23,580.00 shall be paid by the Developer in cash
prior to the issuance of a building permit.
19. SUMMARY OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS.
A. Developer shall furnish the City with a cash security amount of $2,000.00 for City
engineering, expenses and administration. The Developer shall furnish the City with a cash security of $1,500 for
City legal expenses associated with the administration of this contract.
B. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this agreement and completion of required public
improvements, landscaping, and grading, the Developer shall furnish the City with a cash security or a letter of credit
from a bank licensed to do business in Minnesota, in the form attached hereto or such other form as required by a bank
and approved by the City, in its reasonable discretion, ("security") for $. The amount of the security was calculated as
follows:
DEVELOPMENT COSTS:
7
CASH SECURITY
City Engineering Inspection – Erosion Control and Public Improvements $2,000
Legal $1,500
TOTAL CASH SECURITY $3,500
LETTER OF CREDIT SECURITY
Sidewalks $32,000
Landscaping – Lot Plantings $38,000
TOTAL LOC SECURITY x 125% $70,000
This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. The bank shall be subject to
the approval of the City Administrator. The City may draw down the security, on five (5) business days written notice
to the Developer, for any violation of the terms of this Contract or without notice if the security is allowed to lapse
prior to the end of the required term. If the required public improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days
prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down without notice. If the security is drawn down,
the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City that work has been
completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with City approval the security may be reduced
from time to time by ninety percent (90%) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10%) of
the amounts certified by the Developer's engineer shall be retained as security until all improvements have been
completed, all financial obligations to the City satisfied, the required "as constructed" plans have been received by the
City, a warranty security is provided, and the public improvements are accepted by the City Council. The City’s
standard specifications for utility and street construction outline procedures for security reductions.
20. WARRANTY. Developer warrants all public improvements required to be constructed by it
pursuant to this Agreement against poor material and faulty workmanship. Developer or its contractors shall post
maintenance bonds in the amount of twenty-five percent (25%) of final certified construction costs to secure the
warranties. The City shall retain ten percent (10%) of the security posted by Developer until the maintenance bonds
are furnished the City or until the warranty period expires, whichever first occurs. The retainage may be used to pay
for warranty work.
8
21. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS.
A. Developer shall pay all actual costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the
development of the public improvements, including but not limited to legal, planning, engineering and inspection
expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the improvements, the preparation of this
Agreement, review of construction plans and documents, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in
monitoring and inspecting development.
B. Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims
made by it and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development.
Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which
the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees.
C. Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Agreement,
including engineering and reasonable attorneys' fees.
D. Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under
this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt plat
development and construction until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest
at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per year.
F. In addition to the charges and special assessments referred to herein, other charges and
special assessments may be imposed such as but not limited to building permit fees and sewer and water access
charges.
22. DEVELOPER’S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the
work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall
promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an
emergency as reasonably determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default and the
opportunity to cure , not less than forty-eight (48) hours in advance. This Contract is a license for the City
9
to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When
the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in
part.
23. MISCELLANEOUS.
A. The Developer represents to the City that, to the best of Developer’s knowledge, the
development complies with all county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but
not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the
development ceases to comply with county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, the City
may, at its option, after thirty (30) days notice and opportunity to cure to Developer refuse to allow
construction or development work until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer
shall cease work until there is compliance.
B. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City or Developer under this
Contract.
C. Breach of the terms of this Contract by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of
building permits and a certificate of occupancy.
D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this
Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of
this Contract.
E. If building permits are issued prior to the acceptance of public improvements, the Developer
assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of public improvements and damage to public
improvements caused by the City, Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, material men, employees, agents, or
third parties. No sewer and water connections or inspections may be conducted and no one may occupy a building for
which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have
been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities are accepted by the City Engineer.
10
F. The action or inaction of the City or Developer shall not constitute a waiver or
amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing,
signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's or Developer’s
failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release.
G. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the
property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer is well seized in fee
title of the property being final platted and/or has obtained consents to this Contract, in the form attached hereto, from
all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property being final
platted; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants.
H. The Developer and contractor shall acquire commercial general liability and property
damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of
the Developer's work or the work of their subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them.
The insurance must be maintained until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements. Limits for
bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for
property damage shall be not less than $200,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of
$1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy on a primary and noncontributory
basis, and the Developer and contractor shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City
signing the plat. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given ten (10) days advance written notice of the
cancellation of the insurance. The Developer must provide a Certificate of Insurance which meets the following
requirements:
1. The Description section of the Accord form needs to read “City of Monticello is named as Additional
Insured with respect to the General Liability and Auto Liability policies on a Primary and Non-
Contributory Basis.” Each policy shall provide 30 days’ notice of cancellation to City of Monticello.
2. Certificate Holder must be City of Monticello.
11
3. Provide copy of policy endorsement showing City of Monticello named as Additional Insured on a
Primary and Non-Contributory Basis.
I. The Developer and contractor shall obtain Workmen’s Compensation Insurance in
accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, including Employer’s Liability Insurance, to the limit of
$100,000.00 each accident.
J. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in
addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to
City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein
set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be
deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any
other right, power or remedy.
K. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the
City, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall
continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells a part or parts of the Development.
L. Temporary ADA-Compliant aggregate surface pathway shall be constructed adjacent
to the TH 25 pathway reconstruction area as required for the storm sewer connection at TH 25. A one-day
closure of the pathway shall be allowed for completion of required storm sewer connection. Advanced
notification to the City and the public of the temporary closure, including pathway signage, is required and
shall be approved by the City of Monticello.
25. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand
delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the
following address: ___________________________. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be
either hand delivered to the City Administrator, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City
Administrator at the following address: Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, Minnesota
12
55362. Notices shall be effective upon delivery, if hand delivered, or one (1) business day after the date of
mailing, if mailed. Either party may change its address for notice purposes by notice to the other party
given in the manner provided in this Paragraph.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
BY: ___________________________________________
Brian Stumpf, Mayor
(SEAL)
AND __________________________________________
Jeff O’Neill, City Administrator
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________,
2014, by Clint Herbst and by Jeff O’Neill, the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Monticello, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its
City Council.
______________________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
13
DEVELOPER:
AUTOZONE PARTS INC.
a Nevada corporation
BY: ______________________________________
Its:Vice President
BY: ______________________________________
Its:Vice President
STATE OF TENNESSEE)
( ss.
COUNTY OF SHELBY____________ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________,
2015 by _______________________________ and____________________ the ___________________
and_________________, respectively, of AutoZone Parts Inc., a Nevada corporation, on behalf of the
corporation.
______________________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission expires:
14
DRAFTED BY:
CITY OF MONTICELLO
505 WALNUT STREET, SUITE 1
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
AMS
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description
Lot 1, Block 1, Amax Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota
15
IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
ST
A
N
D
A
R
D
L
E
G
E
N
D
NO
R
T
H
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
Su
r
v
e
y
i
n
g
&
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
,
I
n
c
.
PO
B
o
x
3
0
6
7
,
B
e
m
i
d
j
i
,
M
n
5
6
6
1
9
2
1
8
-
4
4
4
-
9
3
9
4
>
E
^
h
Z
s
z
/
E
'
ӑ
E
s
/
Z
K
E
D
E
d
>
^
Z
s
/
^
ӑ
E
s
/
Z
K
E
D
E
d
>
/
E
^
W
d
/
K
E
ӑ
K
E
^
d
Z
h
d
/
K
E
D
E
'
D
E
d
E
'
/
E
Z
/
E
'
ӑ
h
d
/
>
/
d
z
>
K
d
/
K
E
ӑ
h
d
/
>
/
d
z
D
W
W
/
E
'
ӑ
ϯ
>
^
Z
^
E
E
/
E
'
ӑ
ϯ
D
K
>
/
E
'
ӑ
W
/
W
>
/
E
^
Z
s
/
^
ALTA / ASCM LAND TITLE SURVEY
FL
O
O
D
D
A
T
A
15
0
5
2
PR
E
P
A
R
E
D
F
O
R
:
JO
B
N
U
M
B
E
R
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
:
SH
E
E
T
1
O
F
1
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
Y
P
E
:
SU
R
V
E
Y
O
R
'
S
C
E
R
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
NO
T
T
O
S
C
A
L
E
VI
C
I
N
I
T
Y
M
A
P
UT
I
L
I
T
Y
C
O
M
P
A
N
I
E
S
UT
I
L
I
T
Y
C
O
M
P
A
N
I
E
S
SURVEYOR NOTESIMPROVEMENT NOTES
LE
G
A
L
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
SI
T
E
D
A
T
A
M I C
H
A
E
L
A
.
STANG
S
T
A
T
E
O
F
MINNE SO T A
UT
I
L
I
T
Y
C
O
M
P
A
N
I
E
S
SI
T
E
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
EX
C
E
P
T
I
O
N
S
PAINT SCUPPER & DOWNSPOUTS TO MATCH
BACKGROUND WALL COLOR.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
TWO PIECE COMPRESSION TRIM
FACE CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS
MFG. WHITE EXTERIOR INSULATED FINISH - PAINT WHITE
PAINT MAN DOOR RED & METAL FRAMES BLACK
DO NOT PAINT OVERHEAD DOOR PAINT ANGLES BLACK
EXPANSION JOINT
ALUMINUM STOREFRONT - RED KYNAR FINISH
FRONT WALL SIGN - 44" Right Stipe Channel Sign
12
TOILET WALL VENTS PAINT TO MATCH WALL
WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE
PIPE GUARD WITH RED SLEEVE
STORE ADDRESS - 6" WHITE REFLECTIVE NUMBERS
GLASS AND ALUMINUM DOORS - CLEAR ANODIZED FINISH
CORRUGATED COLUMN PAINT RED13
14
15
16
17
RIGHT WALL SIGN - 42" A.Z. Only
REAR WALL SIGN - 40" A.Z. Only
18 LEFT WALL SIGN - 40" A.Z. Only
SPLIT
Color Elevation
AutoZone Store #4330
Monticello, MN
Date: October 30, 2015
Revised Date:
®
16
3
9
2
5
33
4
51 3
8
1 113
4
24
7 4
913
1
8
13
2
2
15
1
2
8
8
9
3
10 8
2 6
1
14
6
LINE OF FINISHED FLOOR
23'-0"
0'-0"
9'
-
8
"
SA
N
D
D
U
N
E
23'-0"
0'-0"
1 112
30
"
1234
16
21'-2"
18
20'-2"
42
"
41
"
50
"
36
"
37'-83
4 "
17
20'-2"
42
"
24
"
24
"
24
"
3'-5"3'-5"
18'-7"18'-7"
24
"
SPLIT FACE CMU
COLOR SW6091
RELIABLE WHITE
COMPRESSION COPING: BLACK
SPLIT FACE CMU
COLOR SW6086
SAND DUNE
SPLIT FACE CMU
COLOR SW6088
NUTHATCH
8'-3"8'-3"
SOUTH WALL (REAR)
NORTH WALL (FRONT)
EAST WALL (LEFT)
WEST WALL (RIGHT)
CALL OUTS:
Mickey Wiskow
06.06.14 1
138.30 sq. ft.
115.60 sq.ft.
1.
8.
3/16” THK PIGMENTED PLEXIGLAS RED 2662 AUTOZONE LETTERS.
2. AUTOZONE LETTERS INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED w/ GE TETRA MAX RED LED.
3. 3/16” THK PIGMENTED PLEXIGLAS ORANGE 2119 AUTOZONE STRIPES.
4. AUTOZONE STRIPES INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED w/ GE TETRA MAX ORANGE LED.
5. 6” PRE-FINISHED .040 BLACK/WHITE ALUMINUM RETURNS LETTER LOCKED/STAPLED
TO BACK AND CAULKED. (INSIDE OF LETTERS/STRIPES TO BE WHITE)
6. 1” GLOSS BLACK JEWELITE TRIM FASTENED TO LETTERS/STRIPES w/
MINIMUM #8 SHEET METAL SCREWS PAINTED GLOSS BLACK .
SPACING SHALL NOT EXCEED 18”. NO FEWER THEN FOUR (4) SCREWS
PER FACE.
7. PRE-FINISHED .063 BLACK/WHITE ALUMINUM BACK LETTER LOCKED/STAPLED
TO RETURN AND CAULKED. (INSIDE OF LETTERS/STRIPES TO BE WHITE)
WHITE ALUMINUM TAB w/ RED ® VINYL APPLIED FIRST SURFACE
REFER TO ENGINEERING FOR MOUNTING REQUIREMENTS.
10. 3/8” FLEXIBLE CONDUIT (GREEN FIELD).
11. ¼” WEEP HOLES.
12. 120V - 20 AMP PRIMARY ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS, TO BE
MADE BY LICENSED ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS.
13. UL APPROVED ELECTRICAL SHUT OFF SWITCH.
14. TETRA POWER SUPPLY MOUNTED TO BOTTOM OF RACEWAY COVER.
15. 8” x 10”H x .063 ALUMINUM FOUR SIDED INTERIOR RACEWAY
w/ REMOVABLE FACE.
P-1
V-1.
P-2, P-3
9.
(REQUIRED FOR ALL SIGNS).
FRONT VIEW
SCALE: ¼” = 1’-0”
LED LAYOUT
SCALE: NTS
3.3A
17
1
1
S
C
H
E
U
R
I
N
G
R
O
A
D
DE
P
E
R
E
,
W
I
5
4
1
1
5
ww
w
.
j
o
n
e
s
s
i
g
n
.
c
o
m
TO
L
L
F
R
E
E
:
8
0
0
-
5
3
6
-
7
4
4
6
TE
L
:
9
2
0
-
9
8
3
-
6
7
0
0
FA
X
:
9
2
0
-
9
8
3
-
9
1
4
5
QT
Y
:
(
1
)
GLOSS BLACK
RUSTOLEUM 20-9109 WHITE PRIMER
SHERWIN WILLIAMS RELIABLE WHITE
SIGN TECH (ARLON) 2500-2662 RED CAST FLEX VINYL
P-1
P-2
P-3
V-1
FINISHES:
1. ALL VISIBLE SCREW HEADS & POP RIVETS PAINTED GLOSS BLACK.
2. RACEWAY SHIPPED IN (5) PIECES (2-BACKS, 1-FRONT, 2-ENDS) & ASSEMBLED IN FIELD.
NOTES:
MATERIAL LIST
229 Mod
236 Mod
5 Ea
0 Ea
185 Ft
54 Ea
54 Ea
34 Ea191600041
GEMXPO-1
GEMXRD-1
GEPS12-60U-NA
GEPS12-20
9409
192160005
191600041
Supply Wire
End Caps
LED
Module
Power
Supply
Choose one wire
connector
115 Ft
118 Ft
Modules
41.0
27.0
18.0
26.0
44.0
26.0
27.0
27.0
T
O
GEMXRD-1
A
Z
U
O
N
E
1
1
Modules
9.0
10.0
10.0
14.0
18.0
28.0
29.0
111.0
MATERIAL BREAKDOWN
1
P/SGEMXPO-1
S3
S4
S5
S1
S2
S6
S7
S8 1
P/S
8”
6”
10
”
1”
1”
2”
3”
3”
2” GAP IN BACK PANEL TO
ALLOW ACCESS TO ELECTRICAL WHIPS
SECTION DETAIL
SCALE: NTS
AU
T
O
Z
O
N
E
-
S
T
O
R
E
#
44
”
A
Z
C
H
A
N
N
E
L
L
E
T
T
E
R
S
-
LS
XXXX
JO
B
N
A
M
E
:
C
I
T
Y
,
S
T
A
T
E
1
37’-8 5/8”
22’-2¼”8’-0” TYP
44”
8
31.610"28.419"29.301"39.777"29.301"18.163"28.378"33.900"
2.
6
6
9
"
4.
5
1
6
"
5.
9
5
3
"
8.
8
2
7
"
14.233"
19.023"21.260"
6.50 5.81
4.35
2.70
1.82
1.38 .82
10.36 6.68 4.90 7.17 12.15 7.17 6.62 7.84
1329.33
CALL OUTS:
Mickey Wiskow
06.06.14
AU
T
O
Z
O
N
E
-
S
T
O
R
E
#
42
”
A
Z
C
H
A
N
N
E
L
L
E
T
T
E
R
S
-
NS
XXXX
1
74.08 sq. ft.
57.36 sq.ft.
1.
8.
3/16” THK PIGMENTED PLEXIGLAS RED 2662 AUTOZONE LETTERS.
2. AUTOZONE LETTERS INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED w/ GE TETRA MAX RED LED.
5. 6” PRE-FINISHED .040 BLACK/WHITE ALUMINUM RETURNS LETTER LOCKED/STAPLED
TO BACK AND CAULKED. (INSIDE OF LETTERS/STRIPES TO BE WHITE)
6. 1” GLOSS BLACK JEWELITE TRIM FASTENED TO LETTERS/STRIPES w/
MINIMUM #8 SHEET METAL SCREWS PAINTED GLOSS BLACK .
SPACING SHALL NOT EXCEED 18”. NO FEWER THEN FOUR (4) SCREWS
PER FACE.
7. PRE-FINISHED .063 BLACK/WHITE ALUMINUM BACK LETTER LOCKED/STAPLED
TO RETURN AND CAULKED. (INSIDE OF LETTERS/STRIPES TO BE WHITE)
WHITE ALUMINUM TAB w/ RED ® VINYL APPLIED FIRST SURFACE
REFER TO ENGINEERING FOR MOUNTING REQUIREMENTS.
10. 3/8” FLEXIBLE CONDUIT (GREEN FIELD).
11. ¼” WEEP HOLES.
12. 120V - 20 AMP PRIMARY ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS, TO BE
MADE BY LICENSED ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS.
13. UL APPROVED ELECTRICAL SHUT OFF SWITCH.
14. TETRA POWER SUPPLY MOUNTED TO BOTTOM OF RACEWAY COVER.
15. 8” x 10”H x .063 ALUMINUM FOUR SIDED INTERIOR RACEWAY
w/ REMOVABLE FACE.
P-1
V-1.
P-2, P-3
9.
(REQUIRED FOR ALL SIGNS).
FRONT VIEW
SCALE: 3/8” = 1’-0”
LED LAYOUT
SCALE: NTS
2.6A
8”
6”
10
”
1”
1”
17
1
1
S
C
H
E
U
R
I
N
G
R
O
A
D
DE
P
E
R
E
,
W
I
5
4
1
1
5
ww
w
.
j
o
n
e
s
s
i
g
n
.
c
o
m
TO
L
L
F
R
E
E
:
8
0
0
-
5
3
6
-
7
4
4
6
TE
L
:
9
2
0
-
9
8
3
-
6
7
0
0
FA
X
:
9
2
0
-
9
8
3
-
9
1
4
5
JO
B
N
A
M
E
:
C
I
T
Y
,
S
T
A
T
E
QT
Y
:
(
1
)
2”
GLOSS BLACK
RUSTOLEUM 20-9109 WHITE PRIMER
SHERWIN WILLIAMS RELIABLE WHITE
SIGN TECH (ARLON) 2500-2662 RED CAST FLEX VINYL
P-1
P-2
P-3
V-1
FINISHES:
3”
3”
1. ALL VISIBLE SCREW HEADS & POP RIVETS PAINTED GLOSS BLACK.
2. RACEWAY SHIPPED IN (5) PIECES (2-BACKS, 1-FRONT, 2-ENDS) & ASSEMBLED IN FIELD.
NOTES:
2” GAP IN BACK PANEL TO
ALLOW ACCESS TO ELECTRICAL WHIPS
SECTION DETAIL
SCALE: NTS
MATERIAL LIST
221 Mod
4 Ea
0 Ea
155 Ft
46 Ea
46 Ea
30 Ea191600041
GEMXRD-1
GEPS12-60U-NA
GEPS12-20
9409
192160005
191600041
Supply Wire
End Caps
LED
Module
Power
Supply
Choose one wire
connector
111 Ft
Modules
39.0
25.0
17.0
24.0
40.0
24.0
26.0
26.0
T
O
GEMXRD-1
A
Z
U
O
N
E
1
MATERIAL BREAKDOWN
P/S
1
21’-2”
32.383"
27.107"
17.350"
27.990"
37.997"
27.990"
27.147"
30.195"
9.45
6.09
4.47
6.54 6.54
11.08 6.04
7.15
42”
CALL OUTS:
Mickey Wiskow
06.06.14
AU
T
O
Z
O
N
E
-
S
T
O
R
E
#
40
”
A
Z
C
H
A
N
N
E
L
L
E
T
T
E
R
S
-
NS
XXXX
1
67.22 sq. ft.
52.21 sq.ft.
1.
8.
3/16” THK PIGMENTED PLEXIGLAS RED 2662 AUTOZONE LETTERS.
2. AUTOZONE LETTERS INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED w/ GE TETRA MAX RED LED.
5. 6” PRE-FINISHED .040 BLACK/WHITE ALUMINUM RETURNS LETTER LOCKED/STAPLED
TO BACK AND CAULKED. (INSIDE OF LETTERS/STRIPES TO BE WHITE)
6. 1” GLOSS BLACK JEWELITE TRIM FASTENED TO LETTERS/STRIPES w/
MINIMUM #8 SHEET METAL SCREWS PAINTED GLOSS BLACK .
SPACING SHALL NOT EXCEED 18”. NO FEWER THEN FOUR (4) SCREWS
PER FACE.
7. PRE-FINISHED .063 BLACK/WHITE ALUMINUM BACK LETTER LOCKED/STAPLED
TO RETURN AND CAULKED. (INSIDE OF LETTERS/STRIPES TO BE WHITE)
WHITE ALUMINUM TAB w/ RED ® VINYL APPLIED FIRST SURFACE
REFER TO ENGINEERING FOR MOUNTING REQUIREMENTS.
10. 3/8” FLEXIBLE CONDUIT (GREEN FIELD).
11. ¼” WEEP HOLES.
12. 120V - 20 AMP PRIMARY ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS, TO BE
MADE BY LICENSED ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS.
13. UL APPROVED ELECTRICAL SHUT OFF SWITCH.
14. TETRA POWER SUPPLY MOUNTED TO BOTTOM OF RACEWAY COVER.
15. 8” x 10”H x .063 ALUMINUM FOUR SIDED INTERIOR RACEWAY
w/ REMOVABLE FACE.
P-1
V-1.
P-2, P-3
9.
(REQUIRED FOR ALL SIGNS).
FRONT VIEW
SCALE: 3/8” = 1’-0”
LED LAYOUT
SCALE: NTS
2.6A
8”
6”
10
”
1”
1”
17
1
1
S
C
H
E
U
R
I
N
G
R
O
A
D
DE
P
E
R
E
,
W
I
5
4
1
1
5
ww
w
.
j
o
n
e
s
s
i
g
n
.
c
o
m
TO
L
L
F
R
E
E
:
8
0
0
-
5
3
6
-
7
4
4
6
TE
L
:
9
2
0
-
9
8
3
-
6
7
0
0
FA
X
:
9
2
0
-
9
8
3
-
9
1
4
5
JO
B
N
A
M
E
:
C
I
T
Y
,
S
T
A
T
E
QT
Y
:
(
1
)
2”
GLOSS BLACK
RUSTOLEUM 20-9109 WHITE PRIMER
SHERWIN WILLIAMS RELIABLE WHITE
SIGN TECH (ARLON) 2500-2662 RED CAST FLEX VINYL
P-1
P-2
P-3
V-1
FINISHES:
3”
3”
1. ALL VISIBLE SCREW HEADS & POP RIVETS PAINTED GLOSS BLACK.
2. RACEWAY SHIPPED IN (5) PIECES (2-BACKS, 1-FRONT, 2-ENDS) & ASSEMBLED IN FIELD.
NOTES:
2” GAP IN BACK PANEL TO
ALLOW ACCESS TO ELECTRICAL WHIPS
SECTION DETAIL
SCALE: NTS
MATERIAL LIST
214 Mod
4 Ea
0 Ea
165 Ft
50 Ea
50 Ea
34 Ea191600041
GEMXRD-1
GEPS12-60U-NA
GEPS12-20
9409
192160005
191600041
Supply Wire
End Caps
LED
Module
Power
Supply
Choose one wire
connector
107 Ft
Modules
35.0
25.0
17.0
23.0
40.0
23.0
25.0
26.0
T
O
GEMXRD-1
A
Z
U
O
N
E
1
MATERIAL BREAKDOWN
P/S
1
40”
20’-2”
8.58
30.888"25.832"16.594"26.835"36.101"26.835"26.000"28.905"
5.54 4.08 5.96 10.07 5.96 5.50 6.52
CityCouncilAgenda–12/14/2015
1
2K.ConsiderationtocallforapublichearingbythePlanningCommissiononJanuary
5th,2016regardingamendmenttotheMonticelloZoningOrdinanceasrelatedto
MassageTherapyandotherPersonalServicesandtodirectstafftoprepare
ordinancesrelatedtoMessageTherapyLicensing,(AS/JS)
A.REFERENCE&BACKGROUND
TheCityCouncilisaskedtodirectthePlanningCommissionholdapublichearingon
amendmentstotheMonticelloZoningOrdinanceasrelatedtoMassageTherapyand
otherPersonalServicesandtodirectstafftoprepareordinancesrelatedtoMessage
TherapyLicensing.
Overthelastfewyears,Citystaffhavereceivedvariousinquiriesrelatedtomassage
therapyintermsofbothitsallowanceunderzoningregulationsandCitylicensing
requirements.
Atthistime,theCitydoesnothavealicensingprogramformessagetherapy.In
termsofzoningregulations,massagetherapyisincludedwithinthedefinitionof
“PersonalServices”intheZoningOrdinanceandregulatedassuchforlanduse
purposes.
Inresearchinvolvedinrespondingtoinquiriesonthesetypesofuses,Citystaffhave
learnedthattheStateofMinnesotadoesnotcurrentlyhaveastatewidelicensing
programforthistypeofactivity.Minnesotaisoneonlyfivestateswhichdoesnot
havesuchalicensingprogram.Inlieuofastatewidelicensingprogram,manycities
haveadoptedtheirownlicensingprograms.Minnesotacitieshavecitedhealth,safety
andwelfareasthebasisforsuchordinances.Theadoptionofmassagetherapy
licensingordinanceshasallowedcitiestotakeamoreproactiveapproachin
regulatingmassagetherapyasalegitimatebusinesspractice,servingasatoolto
preventordiscourage businesseswhichmayengageinillegalactivityunderthe
auspicesofmassagetherapy.
WhethertheCitywishestopursuealicensingprogram,distinguishingmassage
therapyfromother“PersonalServices”inthezoningordinancewouldestablish
additionallandusereviewofsuchusesthroughaconditionalusepermitprocess.If
theCityweretoadoptalicensingprogram,theamendmenttothezoningordinance
wouldalsocreateamoreclearlydefinedrelationshiptotheCitylicensingprogram.
Atpresent,thereareapproximately20-25massagetherapypracticesinMonticello,
includingindividualpractitioners,aswellasmassagetherapyservicesofferedwithin
chiropracticclinic,medicalclinicsandsalons.
Staffwouldrequestfeedbackfromthemassagetherapycommunityaspartofthe
developmentofthelicensingprogram.
A1.BudgetImpact:Budgetimpactatthistimeislimitedtothepublicationof
thePlanningCommissionhearingnotice.Atthistime,thebudgetimpactofa
fulllicensingprogramisunknown,butwouldbeevaluatedwithstaff’s
CityCouncilAgenda–12/14/2015
2
researchontheprogramandbroughtforwardaspartofthelicensing
consideration.
A2.StaffImpact:TheCityClerk,CommunityDevelopmentDirector,Building
Officialandotherstaffwillbeinvolvedinthedevelopmentofordinance
documentsforPlanningCommissionandCouncilreview,aswellasgathering
stakeholderfeedback.TheCityAttorneyandPlannermayalsobeconsulted.
Stafftimeisestimatedat10-12hours,withconsultingtimeof5-10hours.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS
1.MotiontocallforapublichearingbythePlanningCommissiononJanuary5th,
2016regardingamendmenttotheMonticelloZoningOrdinanceasrelatedto
MassageTherapyandotherPersonalServicesandtodirectstafftoprepare
ordinancesrelatedtoMessageTherapyLicensing
2.MotiontodenycallingforapublichearingbythePlanningCommissionon
January5th,2016regardingamendmenttotheMonticelloZoningOrdinanceas
relatedtoMassageTherapyandotherPersonalServicesandtodirectstaffto
prepareordinancesrelatedtoMessageTherapyLicensing
3.Motiontotableforadditionalinformation.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION
StaffrecommendsmovingforwardwiththeordinancedevelopmentforboththeCity
Codelicensingprogramandforzoningordinanceregulationsspecifictomassage
therapy.Asagrowingfieldofpractice,theCity’sinterestinregulatingmassage
therapyistoprotectthepublichealth,safetyandwelfare.TheWrightCounty
Sheriff’sOfficehasbeenconsultedregardingthelicensingprogramsandsupportsthe
implementationofsuchaprogram.
StaffhasincludedfortheCityCouncil’sreferenceanexcerptfromtheAmerican
MassageTherapyAssociation,whichprovidesfurthersupporttowhytheindustry
itselfsupportsregulations.TheAmericanMassageTherapyAssociation(AMTA)is
thelargestnon-profit,professionalassociationservingmassagetherapists,massage
studentsandmassageschools.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA
•Excerpt,AMTA–MassageTherapyRegulation
•ListofMinnesotacitieswithMassageTherapylicensingprograms,sample
Albertville
Andover
Annandale
Anoka
Apple Valley
Bemidji
Big Lake
Blaine
Burnsville
Chaska
Cloquet
Columbia Heights
Cottage Grove
Duluth
Eagan
East Grand Forks
Elk River
Faribault
Forest Lake
Fridley
Golden Valley
Hastings
Hopkins
Lakeville
Little Canada
Maple Grove
Maple Plain
Maplewood
Minneapolis
Moorhead
Mounds View
New Hope
Oakdale
Orono
Plymouth
Prior Lake
Ramsey
Rochester
Roseville
Savage
Shoreview
St. Cloud
St. Louis Park
St. Paul
Waite Park
White Bear Lake
Woodbury
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
2L.ConsiderationtoapproveaLicenseAgreementbetweentheEDAandtheCityof
Monticelloforuseof201and249EastBroadwayandaportionof100EastBroadway
forCityProject10C009/IntersectionofCSAH75/TH25.(AS)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
TheCityCouncilisaskedtoconsiderenteringintoatemporarylicensewiththeEDAfor
publicinfrastructurepurposes.Thesubjectpropertyforthelicenseagreementis201/249
EastBroadway(thewestern-mostparceloftheformerCedarStreetGardenCentersite)
and100EastBroadway.
TheproposedlicenseagreementbetweentheEDAandCityallowsforstorageof
equipmentandmaterialsbytheCity’sawardedcontractorduringtheconstructionof
intersectionimprovementsatCSAH75/TH25.TheCityEngineerhasindicatedthatdue
totherelativelyconfinedareafortheproject,thesepublicly-ownedpropertiescanprovide
thenecessaryspaceforstagingandstorageduringconstruction,includingmachinery,
vehiclesandmaterials.
Thecontractorsandsubcontractorswillberequiredtorestorebothsitestoexisting
condition.Thisrequirementisincludedinthelanguageforthelicense.Inaddition,this
licensedoesnotimpactthelicenseagreementinplaceforuseofthepavedareaforparking
at201CedarStreet.Thecontractorwillbenotifiedofthisexistingcondition.
TheEDAapprovedthelicenseagreementonNovember18th,2015.
StaffhassuggestedasunsetdateofAugust1st,2016tocoincidewiththeendof
constructionfortheintersectionproject.
A1.BudgetImpact:TheCitywillpassalongtherequirementsforconditionofstorage
andrestorationtothesite(s)aspartofthepublicimprovementcontract.TheFinance
Directorwillverifyinsurancerequirementsasneeded.
A2.StaffImpact:None.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.Motiontoapprovealicenseagreementasdescribedfor 201and249EastBroadway
andaportionof100EastBroadwayforCityProject10C009/IntersectionofCSAH75/TH
25.
2.Motionofother.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
StaffrecommendsAlternative#1.Thelicenseagreementisatemporaryconditiontoallow
theCityareasforstagingandstorageassociatedwithapublicimprovementproject.
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
2
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
•AerialSiteImage
•DraftLicenseAgreement
470614v2 MNI MN190-101
LICENSE AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT made this 18th day of November, 2015, by and between the City of Monticello
Economic Development Authority, a public body corporate and politic and political subdivision of
the State of Minnesota (“EDA”) and the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation
("City").
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the EDA is the owner of the properties located at 201 East Broadway Street, PID
155010067010, 249 East Broadway Street, PID 155010067060, and 100 Broadway East, PID
155010034150, in the City, as described and hereto attached as Exhibit A (the "Subject Property").
WHEREAS, the City desires to obtain a license over and across a portion of the Subject
Property for staging, storage, and mobilization operations associated with City Improvement Project
10C009 for improvements to the intersection of CSAH 75/TH 25 (the “Permitted Uses”).
WHEREAS, the EDA has agreed to allow the City to enter onto the Subject Property for the
Permitted Uses in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1. The EDA does hereby grant to the City, its employees, agents and contractors (the “Authorized
Parties”), a non-exclusive, non-transferable license to use the Subject Property for the Permitted
Uses. The Authorized Parties shall have access to the Property seven (7) days a week between
the hours of 5:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.
2. Nothing in this Agreement shall prohibit the EDA from the use of the Subject Property for
public purposes.
3. The City shall be responsible for all costs relating to construction, reconstruction, maintenance,
signage, and repair and restoration, including snow removal, with respect to the Subject
Property during the license period (the “Maintenance”). The Maintenance is a personal
obligation of the City and shall be binding upon the executors, administrators, successors, heirs
and assigns of the City.
4. The City agrees to indemnify, save harmless, and defend the EDA, its officers, and employees,
from and against any and all claims, actions, damages, liability and expense in connection with
personal injury and/or damage to the Subject Property arising from or out of any occurrence in,
470614v2 MNI MN190-101
upon or at the Subject Property caused by the act or omission of the Authorized Parties in
conducting the Permitted Uses on the Subject Property, and will, at the City’s own cost and
expense, defend any and all suits or actions (just or unjust) which may be brought against the
EDA or in which the EDA may be impleaded with others upon any such above-mentioned matter,
claim, or claims. This indemnity and hold harmless provision will include indemnity against all
costs, expenses, and liabilities incurred in or in connection with any such claims or proceedings
brought thereon and the defense thereof.
5. The City shall not permit any mechanics’, materialmens’ or other liens to stand against the
Subject Property or any part thereof for work or materials furnished to the City in connection
with the Permitted Uses granted pursuant to this Agreement and the City agrees to indemnify,
defend and hold harmless the EDA from and against the same.
6. The EDA, at its sole option, may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days’ written notice to the
City.
7. This Agreement shall expire on August 1st, 2016 unless sooner terminated pursuant to paragraph 6.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement the day and year
first above written.
CITY OF MONTICELLO ECONOMIC
DEVELO P MENT AUTHORITY
By: _____________________
Bill Demeules, President
By: ________________________
Jeff O'Neill, Executive Director
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this __ day of
____________, 2015, by Bill Demeules, President of the City of Monticello Economic Development
Authority, a public body corporate and politic and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, on
behalf of the political subdivision.
NOTARY PUBLIC
470614v2 MNI MN190-101
CITY OF MONTICELLO
By: _______________________________
Brian Stumpf, Mayor
By: _______________________________
Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this __ day of ____________, 2015, by
Brian Stumpf and by Jeff O'Neill, the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Monticello, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by
its City Council.
NOTARY PUBLIC
470614v2 MNI MN190-101
EXHIBIT A
Lots 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, Block B, Original Plat of Monticello, County of Wright, Minnesota
and
Lots 14 and 15, Block 34, Original Plat of Monticello, County of Wright, Minnesota
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
1
2M.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2015-088approvingChangeOrderNo.4,
acceptingimprovementsandauthorizingfinalpaymenttoMunicipalBuilders,Inc.
forthesludgedewateringfacility,CityProjectNo.12C003(WSB)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
AttheMay28,2013meeting,theCityCouncilacceptedthebidofMunicipalBuilders,
Inc.fortheconstructionoftheWWTFSludgeDewateringFacilityaspartofPhase1of
theWastewaterTreatmentFacilityBiosolidsDewatering,EnergyEfficiency,Headworks
andSiteImprovements,CityProject#12C003.TheCityCouncilawardedtheprojectto
MunicipalBuilders,Inc.aslowbidderintheamountof$1,376,100.
MunicipalBuilders,Inc.hasconstructedthedewateringbuildingincluding
commissioningofthescrewpressandancillaryequipment.Thefacilitywasofficially
placedintoserviceasofthedateofSubstantialCompletionwhichwasDecember31,
2013.TheCouncilhadpreviouslyapprovedthreechangeordersassummarizedbelow.
ChangeOrder#4isproposedthatispartoftheapprovedchangeorder3relatedtothe
primarydigestermixerrepairs.ApprovalofChangeOrder#4,intheamountof
$4,064.00,allowstheprojecttobefinalized.Thefinalcontractamountincludingallof
thechangeorderstotals$1,438,792.24.
Asummaryofallthechangeordersisprovidedbelowtoaddressthetimelineassociated
withtheproject.
ChangeOrderSummary
ChangeOrder#1wasacollectionof15minoritemstothefacilitythatwereidentified
andapprovedduringconstruction.ThechangeorderwasprocessedattheOctober28,
2013CityCouncilmeetingintheamountof$8,179.83.
ChangeOrder#2wasanetno-costchangeordertotheCityforareplacementpolymer
injectorringtohelptheperformanceofthescrewpress.Itadded$1,069.50tothe
contractforMunicipalBuilders,Inc.anddeductedthesameamountfromthe
procurementcontracttoHuberTechnology.
ChangeOrder#3wasapprovedbyCouncilonJuly14,2014toaddresstwonecessary
repairsthatoccurredatthewastewatertreatmentfacility.Oneoftherepairswasrelated
tothefailureoftheceilingplateassociatedwiththesecondarydigesteratthefacility.
Thesecondrepairwasrelatedtoasealfailureononeofthedrafttubemixersinthe
primarydigester.Duetotheemergencynatureofthesituation,therepairswereaddedto
theMunicipalBuilderscontractwhichwasstillopen.ChangeOrder#3wasprocessedto
compensateMunicipalBuilders,Inc.,fortherepairstothecoveronthesecondary
digesterintheamountof$49,378.91.ChangeOrder#4needstobeprocessedto
compensateMunicipalBuildersfortheworkassociatedwithremovingandre-installing
thedrafttubemixerintheprimarydigester.AspartofthisCityCouncilauthorization,it
wasidentifiedthatthiswouldoccur.
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
2
ChangeOrderNo.4
ChangeOrder#4totals$4064.00tocompensateMunicipalBuilders,Inc.,fortheirrole
associatedwiththemaintenanceofoneofthedrafttubemixersintheprimarydigester.
TheContractorremovedthedrafttubemixertoallowtheCitytoshipittothe
manufacturertorepairafailedseal.TheContractoralsore-installedthemixerafterit
hadbeenrepaired.
TheCityhasbeendelayingprocessingthechangeorderduearemainingconcern
associatedwiththeworkperformedbyMunicipalBuilders,Inc.Theidentifiedconcern
wasrelatedtoscuffingandtheappearanceofthefloorswithinthebuildingasdetailed
below.
DewateringBuildingFloorAppearanceConcern
MunicipalBuilders,Inc.,iscurrentlyintheprocessofrepairingthefloorsatnocostto
theCityanduponsatisfactorycompletion,itisrecommendedtoapprovefinalpayment.
Therepairmethodingeneral,includesgrindingthefloors,sealinganycracksand
applyinga2coatpolyurethanepaint.WSBreviewedtheproposedrepairmethodand
recommendedtheCityallowtheContractortomoveforwardwithperformingthework.
TheworkisanticipatedtobecompletebyDecember14,2015.
FinalPayRequest
Giventhatthefloorrepairsarecompletedsatisfactorily,thefinalpayrequestis
recommendedtobeprocessingtoallowtheCityandtheContractortoremovetheproject
fromtheiraccountingprocessesin2015ratherthanhaveitcarryoverinto2016.
Payvoucherno.15(andfinal)isalsoattachedtothisagendaitemintheamountof
$4,064.00.MunicipalBuilders,Inc.hassubmittedthefollowingitemsthatarerelatedto
finalpayment:
•Lienwaivers
•Consentofsurety
•IC134forms
•2-yearmaintenancebond
MunicipalBuilders,Inc.,hascompliedwiththeprojectspecificationsandcontractor
documentsandhassuccessfullycompletedthebuildingconstructionandequipment
commissioning.ThereforeWSBrecommendsthattheCitymakefinalpaymentto
MunicipalBuilders,Inc.intheamountof$4,064.00contingentonthefloorrepairsbeing
completedsatisfactorily.Thefinalcontractamounttotals$1,438,792.24.
A1.BudgetImpact:TheCitysold$3millioninbondstofinancethePhase1
improvements.Finalpaymentof$4,064.00toMunicipalBuilders,Inc.willbe
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
3
madewiththeproceedsofthatbondsale.Theestimatedtotalprojectcostsforthe
Phase1improvementsareestimatedunderthebondingamount.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Theonlyimpactstostaffworkloadwillbethetime
thatittakestoprocessthefinalpayment.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2015-088approvingChangeOrder#4andaccepting
theWWTFSludgeDewateringFacilityandauthorizingfinalpaymentof
$4,064.00toMunicipalBuilders,Inc.,CityProjectNo.12C003contingenton
acceptanceoffloorrepairwork.
2.MotiontodenyadoptionofResolution#2015-088atthistime.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
StaffrecommendsselectingAlternative#1.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
•Resolution#2015-088
•Letterofrecommendation
•ChangeOrder#4
•Payvoucherno.15(andfinal)
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2015-088
ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT TO MUNICIPAL
BUILDERS INC. CITY PROJECT NO. 12C003
WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract with the City of Monticello, on May 28, 2013, Municipal
Builders, Inc. was awarded, by low bid, for the construction of the WWTF Sludge Dewatering
Facility as part of the Phase I of the Wastewater Treatment Facility Biosolids Dewatering, Energy
Efficiency, Headworks and Site Improvements, City Project 12C003;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA that
the work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and approved and that the Mayor and City
Clerk are hereby directed to issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract subject to
receipt of the following:
1) Satisfactory showing that the contractor has complied with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes
290.92 requiring withholding state income tax (IC134);
2) Evidence in the form of an affidavit that all claims against the contractor by reasons of the
contract have been fully paid or satisfactorily secured (lien waivers);
3) Consent of Surety to Final Payment certification from the contractor’s surety;
4) Two year maintenance which will be in effect from when the project was substantially complete
on December 31, 2013 until December 31, 2015.
5) Letter of acceptance from WSB for floor repair work.
ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 14th day of December, 2015.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
___________________________
Brian Stumpf, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk
engineering planning environmental construction 701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763-541-4800
Fax: 763-541-1700
Equal Opportunity Employer
wsbeng.com
K:\01494-650\Admin\Construction Admin\Dewatering Building\Vouchers\1494-65 CST LTR VO 15 FNL CTY-j schreiber-120915 REV SKB.doc
December 9, 2015
Ms. Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk
City of Monticello
505 Walnut Street, Suite 1
Monticello, MN 55362
Re: Construction Pay Voucher No. 15 (Final) and
Final Project Documents
WWTF Sludge Dewatering Facility
City of Monticello Project No. 12C003
WSB Project No. 1494-65
Dear Ms. Schreiber:
Please find enclosed Construction Pay Voucher No. 15 and final (in triplicate) in the amount of $4,064.00
for the above-referenced project. The final payment request represents the payment of Change Order No.
4 on the contract.
We recommend that the City of Monticello approve Construction Pay Voucher No. 15 and final for
Municipal Builders, Inc. at the December 14, 2015, City Council meeting, contingent on acceptance of
floor repair work.
Enclosed is the following documentation required for releasing final payment for the above-referenced
project:
1. Satisfactory showing that the contractor has complied with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes
290.92 requiring withholding state income tax (IC134 forms).
2. Evidence in the form of an affidavit that all claims against the contractor by reasons of the
contract have been fully paid or satisfactorily secured (lien waivers).
3. Consent of Surety to Final Payment certification from the contractor’s surety.
4. Two-year maintenance bond.
5. WSB will provide a letter to the City accepting the floor repair work when complete, in order for
final payment to be released.
The maintenance period will be in effect from when the project was substantially complete on December
31, 2013 until December 31, 2015.
Please contact me at 763-270-3460 if you have any questions. Thank you.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Page 2
K:\01494-650\Admin\Construction Admin\Dewatering Building\Vouchers\1494-65 CST LTR VO 15 FNL CTY-j schreiber-120915 REV SKB.doc
George R. Bender, PE
Project Manager
Enclosures
cc: Wayne Oberg, City of Monticello
Shibani Bisson, WSB & Associates, Inc.
Nate Neubauer, Municipal Builders, Inc. srb
Owner: Date:December 7, 2015
For Period:15 AND FINAL
Contractor:
PAY VOUCHER
WWTF SLUDGE DEWATERING FACILITY
CITY PROJECT NO. 12C003
CITY OF MONTICELLO, MN
WSB PROJECT NO. 1494-65
SUMMARY
1Original Contract Amount $1,376,100.00
2Change Order - Addition$62,692.24
3Change Order - Deduction$0.00
4Revised Contract Amount $1,438,792.24
5Value Completed to Date $1,431,188.32
6Material on Hand $0.00
7Amount Earned $1,431,188.32
8Less Retainage0.0%$0.00
9Subtotal $1,431,188.32
10Less Amount Paid Previously $1,427,124.32
11AMOUNT DUE THIS PAY VOUCHER NO.15 AND FINAL$4,064.00
Recommended for Approval by:
WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Approved by Contractor:Approved by Owner:
Specified Contract Completion Date:Date:
June 30, 2014
City of Monticello, MN
09/01/14 to 12/31/14
Municipal Builders, Inc.
MUNICIPAL BUILDERS, INC.CITY OF MONTICELLO, MN
Project Manager/Engineer
SEE ATTACHED FOR CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE
Request No.:
Page 1 of 2
K:\01494-650\Admin\Construction Admin\Dewatering Building\Vouchers\
1494-65 Voucher No 15 and FINAL-120715VO 15 FNL Cover
PROJECT PAYMENT STATUS
OWNER:
CONTRACTOR:
CHANGE ORDERS
No.Date Amount
110/11/13 $8,179.83
207/18/14 $1,069.50
309/16/14 $49,378.91
412/07/15 $4,064.00
Total Change Orders $62,692.24
PAYMENT SUMMARY
CurrentTotalTotal Amount
No.FromToPaymentRetainageEarned
106/03/1306/30/13
207/01/1307/31/13
308/01/1308/31/13
409/01/1309/30/13
510/01/1310/31/13
611/01/1311/30/13
712/01/1312/31/13
801/01/1401/31/14
902/01/1402/28/14
1003/01/1403/31/14
1104/01/1404/30/14
1205/01/1405/31/14
1306/01/1406/30/14
1407/01/1407/31/14
CO #308/01/1408/31/14
15 AND FINAL09/01/1412/31/14
Material on Hand
Original Contract$1,376,100.00
Change Orders$62,692.24
Total Amount Earned to DateRevised Contract$1,438,792.24
$0.00$1,377,745.41
Description
$1,317,571.19
$1,344,391.19
$1,346,891.19
$1,351,891.19
$25,479.00
$36,047.28
$4,875.00$33,797.28
$33,928.73
$295,750.04$43,327.51$866,550.18
$95,186.21$65,878.56
$1,217,375.18
$1,357,149.37$5,126.73
$67,219.56
Change Order No. 1 (see change order document for description)
Change Order No. 2 (see change order document for description)
$159,198.91$8,378.89$167,577.80
$373,183.35
Change Order No. 4 (see change order document for description)
$18,659.17
$33,672.28
CITY OF MONTICELLO, MN
WSB PROJECT NO. 1494-65
MUNICIPAL BUILDERS, INC.
$1,431,188.32
$333,283.75$60,868.76
$0.00
$1,431,188.32
$195,325.27
$1,910.90$33,977.73
Change Order No. 3 (see change order document for description)
$555,234.35
$1,359,109.27
$0.00
$172,948.45$27,761.72
$7,001.47$34,157.26$1,366,290.27
Total Payment to Date
Total Retainage to Date
$9,491.76$34,400.64$1,376,025.41
$36,120.64
$49,378.91
$4,064.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,427,124.32
$1,431,188.32
Page 2 of 2
K:\01494-650\Admin\Construction Admin\Dewatering Building\Vouchers\
1494-65 Voucher No 15 and FINAL-120715VO 15 FNL Summary
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
1
2N.ConsiderationtoadoptResolution#2015-089declaringtheofficialintentoftheCity
ofMonticellotoreimbursecertainexpendituresfromtheproceedsofbondstobe
issuedbytheCityfortheextensionof95th Street (WO)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
TheInternalRevenueServicerequiresthecitytoadoptaresolutiondeclaringtheofficial
intenttoreimbursecertainprojectexpendituresfrombondproceeds,ifthecityplansor
wouldissuebondstofinanceprojectcosts.Bypassingthisresolutionitwouldallowthe
citytopossiblyincludetheimprovementprojectextending95th Streetinafuturebond
issue.Theprojectincludestheextensionof95th StreetbetweenGillardAvenueand
CSAH75.TheCityCouncilauthorizedpreparationofafeasibilityreportatthe
November23,2015meeting.
Withouttheresolution,bondproceedscouldnotbeusedtofinancetheproject.
A1.BudgetImpact:Byadoptingtheresolution,thecitywouldhavetheabilityto
includetheextensionof95th Streetinafuturebondissue.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Therewouldbenoimpactonthestaffbythisaction.
Therewouldbestafftimeandconsultantcostsrelatedtothebondissue.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2015-089declaringtheofficialintenttoreimburse
expendituresfromtheproceedsofbondsforimprovementsrelatedtoextending
95th Street.
2.Motiontonotadoptaresolutiondeclaringtheofficialintenttoreimburse
expendituresfromtheproceedsofbonds.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffsupportsAlternative#1.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
•Resolution#2015-089
1
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2015-089
DECLARING THE OFFICIAL INTENT OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO TO
REIMBURSE CERTAIN EXPENDITURES FROM THE PROCEEDS OF BONDS TO BE
ISSUED BY THE CITY FOR THE EXTENSION OF 95TH STREET
WHEREAS, the Internal Revenue Service has issued Treas. Reg. §1.150-2 providing that
proceeds of tax-exempt bonds used to reimburse prior expenditures will not be deemed spent
unless certain requirements are met; and
WHEREAS, the City expects to incur certain expenditures which may be financed temporarily
from sources other than bonds, and reimbursed from the proceeds of a bond;
WHEREAS, the City has determined to make this declaration of official intent (“Declaration”) to
reimburse certain costs from proceeds of bonds in accordance with the Reimbursement
Regulations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MONTICELLO (THE “CITY”) AS FOLLOWS:
1. The City reasonably intends to make expenditures for the projects described in Exhibit A
(the “Projects”), and reasonably intends to reimburse itself for such expenditures from the
proceeds of debt to be issued by the City in the maximum principal amount described in
Exhibit A. All reimbursed expenditures will be capital expenditures, costs of issuance of
the bonds, or other expenditures eligible for reimbursement under Section 1.150-2(d)(3)
of the Reimbursement Regulations.
2. This Declaration has been made not later than 60 days after payment of any original
expenditure to be subject to a reimbursement allocation with respect to the proceeds of
bonds, except for the following expenditures: (a) costs of issuance of bonds; (b) costs in
an amount not in excess of $100,000 or 5 percent of the proceeds of an issue; or (c)
“preliminary expenditures” up to an amount not in excess of 20 percent of the aggregate
issue price of the issue or issues that finance or are reasonably expected by the City to
finance the project for which the preliminary expenditures were incurred. The term
“preliminary expenditures” includes architectural, engineering, surveying, bond issuance,
and similar costs that are incurred prior to commencement of acquisition, construction or
rehabilitation of a project, other than land acquisition, site preparation, and similar costs
incident to commencement of construction.
3. This Declaration is an expression of the reasonable expectation of the City based on the
facts and circumstances known to the City as of the date hereof. The anticipated original
expenditures for the Project and the principal amount of the bonds described in paragraph
1 are consistent with the City’s budgetary and financial circumstances. No sources other
than proceeds of bonds to be issued by the City are, or are reasonably expected to be,
reserved, allocated on a long-term basis, or otherwise set aside pursuant to the City’s
budget or financial policies to pay such project expenditures.
4. The City Administrator is authorized to designate appropriate additions to Exhibit A in
circumstances where time is of the essence, and any such designation shall be reported to
the Council at the earliest practicable date and shall be filed with the official books and
records of the City as provided in Section 3.
5. This resolution is intended to constitute a declaration of official intent for purposes of
Treas. Reg. § 1.150-2 and any successor law, regulation, or ruling.
ADOPTED BY the City Council this 14th day of December, 2015.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
__________________________________
Brian Stumpf, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Jeff O’Neill, City Administrator
3
EXHIBIT A
TO OFFICIAL INTENT RESOLUTION NO. 2015-xxx
ADOPTED December 14, 2015
DATE OF
DECLARATION
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
MAXIMUM
PRINCIPAL
AMOUNT OF DEBT
FOR PROJECT
12/14/2015 IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO THE EXTENSION
OF 95TH STREET - including, but not limited to,
construction of improvements and indirect costs, such as
legal, engineering, administrative, right of way
acquisition (land, etc.) and financing costs. Engineering
costs includes survey, feasibility study, environmental
documents, permitting, preliminary and final design,
preparation of plans and specs, bidding administration,
construction management, staking, inspection and
material testing.
$1,500,000
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
1
2O.ConsiderationofadoptingHighway25CorridorCoalitionJointPowersAgreement
(JO/JS)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
Asyouknow,Citystaffandconsultantsalong,withTomPerraultandLloydHilgart,
havebeenworkingwithrepresentativesfromBigLakeTownship,CityofBigLake,
SherburneCounty,andWrightCountytowarddevelopmentofaprogramsupportingjoint
planningoftransportationimprovements.Thiseffortisintendedtoaddressshortand
longtermcongestionalongtheHighway25CorridorbetweenStateHighway10andI-
94.PresentedbeforeyouisadraftJointPowersagreementwhichrepresentsthe
culminationoftheeffortsofthegrouptowardestablishinganorganizationtoassistwith
guidingandfundingtransportationinvestmentsalongthecorridor.Pleasereviewthe
proposedJointPowersAgreement(JPA)forarticulationoftheneed,responsibilities,and
fundingoftheorganization.
FollowingisanexcerptfromtheJPApertainingtotheresponsibilitiesoftheHighway25
CoalitionasarticulatedintheJPA.
a.Examinationoftheimpactsofcontinuedgrowthinmemberjurisdictionson
trafficpatterns.
b.Conductingtrafficstudiesdefiningandidentifyingpriorityimprovements.
c.Preparationofcollaborativeprojectdesignanddeliveryrecommendations.
d.Studyofvarioustransportationrisksassociatedwithimprovementalternatives
andassociatedtimingoftheconstructionofimprovements.
e.Identificationandapplicationforfundingofactivitiesviagrantprograms.
f.Developmentofunifiedeffortamonglocalandstateinterestsinobtainingfunding
ofimprovementstoinclude:(i)providinginputandleadershipwithineach
MembercommunityonmatterspertainingtoCorridorimprovementplanningand
implementation;and(ii)advocacyattheStateandFederallevel.
g.PartneringwithMNDOTonregionaltransportationdecisionsandinvolvementin
regionalpolicydecisionsanddiscussions.
h.Incorporationofpublicinputinplanningefforts.
DuringthemonthofDecember,onanindividualbasis,eachoftheproposedparticipants
intheJPAwilldeterminewhetherornottoadopttheagreement.Accordingtothedraft
JPA,theagreementdoesnotbecomeactiveuntilallfiveofthecommunitiessignon.
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
2
AquickwordofthankstoWSBfortheinitialworkinpullingthegroupandto
representativesfromMNDOTwhoparticipatedinthediscussion.
ThisagreementhasbeenreviewedbytheCityAttorney.
A1.BudgetImpact:NA
Nonefor2016
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:NA
Staffattendanceatmeetingsasrequired.Meetingsexpectedtobeheldonaquarterly
basiswithfrequencytoadjustinresponsetoneed.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoadoptJointPowersAgreementasproposed.
2.Motiontomodifyandadopt.
3.Motiontodenyadoption.
4.Motiontotable.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
StaffrecommendsAlternative#1.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
•Highway25CorridorCoalitionJointPowersAgreement
184649v2
DRAFT
HIGHWAY 25 CORRIDOR COALITION
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
This joint powers agreement (the “Agreement”) is entered into this _____ day of
____________, 2016, by and between the City of Monticello, a municipal corporation under the
laws of Minnesota, the City of Big Lake, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota,
Big Lake Township, a public corporation under the laws of Minnesota, Sherburne County, a
body corporate and politic under the laws of Minnesota, and Wright County, a body corporate
and politic under the laws of Minnesota. The parties to this Agreement are hereafter referred to
individually as “Member(s)” and collectively as the “Highway 25 Coalition.”
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute § 471.59 authorizes the joint and cooperative exercise of powers
common to the Members; and
WHEREAS, State Highway 25 between I-94 and State Highway 10 (the Corridor) has become a
vital local transportation artery supporting the social and economic well-being of the Members;
and
WHEREAS, the Highway 25 Corridor between I-94 and State Highway 10 is an important
connecting link to two major highways that serves a growing regional and statewide traffic
demand; and
WHEREAS, transportation pressure along the Corridor has grown sharply in recent decades
mirroring the growth of State, regional and local populations which have caused a significant
erosion of traffic capacity; and
WHEREAS, with the growth of local, regional and statewide traffic, along with the increase in
rail activity, the Highway 25 Corridor between I-94 and State Highway 10 has become
increasingly congested. Continued growth is destined to further degrade the operation of the
Corridor which will hamper economic development and negatively impact all that travel along
and across it on a daily or periodic basis; and
WHEREAS, a pre-existing development pattern, the Mississippi River and Burlington Northern
railroad all present physical challenges to development and operation of a corridor with
sufficient capacity to meet existing and future needs; and
WHEREAS, given the availability of undeveloped land and projected growth in traffic demand
over time, it is appropriate for member communities to engage in a joint planning effort for the
sake of efficient and orderly transportation facilities development; and
184649v2
WHEREAS, failure to plan and develop improvement priorities will ultimately result in added
cost and lost opportunities for members of the Highway 25 Coalition and the State of Minnesota;
and
WHEREAS, the potential of gaining grant funds, as well as State and Federal funding
assistance, for Corridor related improvements are greatly enhanced through development of a
unified voice; and
WHEREAS, each Member has adopted a Resolution finding that it is in the best interests of the
citizens of each jurisdiction to enter into this Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 471.59, and in consideration of the
mutual undertakings herein expressed, the parties agree as follows:
1. The Highway 25 Coalition mission is to have the Corridor appropriately expanded to
operate effectively to create timely mobility for workers and emergency response while
saving and enhancing lives through reducing crashes, eliminating rail conflicts and
encouraging more broad economic growth and better connected communities.
2. Activities of the Highway 25 Coalition to include the following;
a. Examination of the impacts of continued growth in Member jurisdictions on
traffic patterns.
b. Conducting traffic studies defining and identifying priority improvements.
c. Preparation of collaborative project design and delivery recommendations.
d. Study of various transportation risks associated with improvement alternatives
and associated timing of the construction of improvements.
e. Identification and application for funding of activities via grant programs.
f. Development of unified effort among local and state interests in obtaining funding
of improvements to include: (i) providing input and leadership within each
Member community on matters pertaining to Corridor improvement planning and
implementation; and (ii) advocacy at the State and Federal level.
g. Partnering with MNDOT on regional transportation decisions and involvement in
regional policy decisions and discussions.
h. Incorporation of public input in planning efforts.
3. Joinder of Member Political Subdivisions. The undersigned Members hereby agree to
join together for the purpose of coordinating short and long term Corridor planning and
system funding efforts and establishing a joint funding source for said activities through
184649v2
establishment of the Highway 25 Corridor Coalition. This Agreement shall become
effective upon adoption of a resolution by the governing body of no less than 5
Members, and shall be binding on all the Members who have joined through adoption of
a resolution by their respective governing bodies through December 31, 2020, unless
otherwise extended or amended by the Members that have signed this Agreement. Near
the end of the term of the Agreement, Members will assess the effectiveness of the
organization and determine whether or not to continue or disband.
4. Highway 25 Coalition Board Composition. Each Member shall appoint annually a
representative to the Highway 25 Coalition Board. Each Member may appoint an
alternate representative who may act in the place and stead of an absent representative
from that Member jurisdiction.
5. Meetings. The Board shall meet at least quarterly on a schedule determined by the
Board. All meetings of the Board shall be conducted in a manner consistent with the
Minnesota Open Meeting Law, Minn. Stat. § 13D.01, et. seq., as amended. Special
meetings may be called by the Board Chair or upon written request of three (3) or more
members of the Board. Written notice of any special meetings shall be sent to all Board
members and to the City Clerk of each City to comply with posting requirements.
6. Powers and Duties. The powers and duties of the Board include, but are not limited to,
expending funds for the purposes noted above including:
a. Approve a work plan and annual budget. In July of each year, the Highway 25
Coalition will establish a work plan and budget for the following fiscal year.
b. Although projects are intended to be completed within a prescribed budget
approved on an annual basis, the Board has the flexibility to modify work plan
and associated expenditures as it deems necessary to support the mission of the
Highway 25 Coalition. In addition, the Board has the option to seek additional
funding from its Members outside of the budget as needs arise.
c. Seek grant funds supporting planning efforts and to utilize funds on hand as
necessary to meet grant program fund matching requirements.
d. Apply for, receive, and expend State and Federal funds available for funding
goals of the Highway 25 Coalition, as well as funds from other lawful sources,
including donations.
e. Enter into contracts with public or private entities as the Board deems necessary
to accomplish the purpose for which the Board is organized, including, but not
limited to, the use of consultants.
f. Obtain such insurance as the Board deems necessary for the protection of the
Board, its property, members of the Board, and Members.
184649v2
7. Funding Formula and Accounting. In January, each Member shall contribute its share of
the annual budget based on the following formula:
a. Sherburne County and Wright County to evenly split 50% of the total cost.
b. City of Monticello, City of Big Lake, Bi g Lake Township and other local
jurisdictions that so choose to join will evenly split the remaining 50% of the total
cost.
c. Accounting services supporting Highway 25 Coalition activities shall be provided
by one of its Members with this assignment made by the Board on an annual basis
or as needed.
8. Jurisdiction Liaison Responsibilities. Individual Board members and associated staff are
responsible for maintaining ongoing communication with the Board he/she represents to
include presentation of the annual work plan and budget to their Board.
9. Voting. Each Member shall have one vote on the Board. A quorum shall consist of a
simple majority (51%) of representatives from the membership. An affirmative four-
fifths (4/5) vote of all the members of the Board shall be required by the Board to take
action.
10. Officers. There shall be a chair, a vice chair, and a secretary elected from the members of
the Board at the initial meeting of each year. The Board may elect or appoint such other
officers as it deems necessary to conduct its meetings and affairs.
11. Effective Date/Termination. This Agreement shall become effective upon execution by
all of the Members after adoption of an authorizing resolution by the governing body
representing each Member jurisdiction and shall continue in effect for five (5) years after
the date of execution of the last Member to execute this Agreement. This Agreement
shall remain in effect until a party hereto gives notice to the Board of its intention to
withdraw. Notice of withdrawal must be given by July 1st of a given year. Termination
will be effective at the conclusion of the calendar year. This Agreement shall remain in
effect as to the remaining Members provided that there are three (3) or more Members
who desire to continue operating the Board. The withdrawing Member shall not be
entitled to compensation or distribution of any assets of the Board. In the event of
dissolution of the Board, all remaining funds after satisfaction of all payments and other
financial obligations shall be returned to the Members in the same manner in which the
Members contributed funding to the Board in the last full calendar year prior to
dissolution.
12. No Waiver. Nothing herein shall be construed to waive or limit any immunity from, or
limitation on, liability available to any jurisdiction, whether set forth in Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 466 or otherwise.
184649v2
13. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties
and supersedes all oral agreements, representations between the parties relating to the
subject matter thereof. Any alteration, variation, modification or amendment of this
Agreement shall be valid only if in writing and executed by all parties.
14. Titles of Sections. The titles of sections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience
of reference only and shall be disregarded in constructing or interpreting any of the
provisions hereof.
15. Severability. If any section, subdivision or provision of this Agreement shall be held
invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or unenforceability of such section,
subdivision or provision shall not invalidate or render unenforceable any of the remaining
provisions.
16. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
17. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. The Highway 25 Corridor Coalition shall fully
defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Members against all claims, losses, liability,
suits, judgments, cost and expenses by reason of the action or inactions of the Board
and/or employees and/or the agents of the Highway 25 Corridor Coalition, except for any
act or omission for which the Member’s employee is guilty of malfeasance, willful
neglect of duty or bad faith. This Agreement to indemnify and hold harmless does not
constitute a waiver by the Highway 25 Corridor Coalition, any Member or any participant
of the limitations on liability provided under Minn. Stat. § 466.04.
To the full extent permitted by law, actions by the Parties pursuant to this Agreement are
intended to be and shall be construed as a “cooperative activity” and it is the intent of the
parties that they shall be deemed a “single governmental unit” for the purposes of
liability, all as set forth in Minn. Stat. § 471.59, subd. 1a(a); provide further that for
purposes of that statute, each party to this Agreement expressly declines responsibility for
the acts or omissions of the other parties .
The parties to this agreement are not liable for the acts or omissions of the other
participants to this Agreement except to the extent to which they have agreed in writing
to be responsible for acts or omissions of the other parties.
Each Member acknowledges and agrees that it is insured or self-insured consistent with
the limits established in Minnesota State Statute. Each Member agrees to promptly notify
all parties if it becomes aware of any potential Board related claim(s) or facts giving rise
to such claims.
18. Data Practices. All government data shall be handled in accordance with the Minnesota
Government Data Practices Act and Federal and State laws and regulations concerning
the handling and disclosure of data. All contracts entered into by the Highway 25
184649v2
Coalition shall contain a provision which requires the vendor to comply with and defend
and indemnify the Members for a violation of this provision.
19. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each one of which will
constitute one and the same instrument.
20. Waiver. In the event that any provision contained in this Agreement should be breached
by any party and thereafter waived by any other party, such waiver shall be limited to the
particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any other concurrent,
previous or subsequent breach hereunder.
21. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended only by unanimous agreement of the
Members as evidenced by resolutions adopted by their respective governing bodies.
22. Disputes. The Members agree that they will submit any disputes under this Agreement to
mediation prior to resorting to an action in Court.
By signing this Agreement, the parties hereto certify that the same has been approved by their
respective Boards.
Big Lake Township City of Big Lake
By_______________________ Date:______ By_______________________ Date:_____
Board Supervisor Mayor
ATTEST: ATTEST:
_________________________ Date:_______ __________________________ Date:_____
Board Clerk City Administrator
City of Monticello Wright County
By_______________________ Date:________ By_______________________ Date:_____
Mayor Board of Commissioner Chair
ATTEST: ATTEST:
_________________________ Date:_______ __________________________ Date:_____
City Administrator County Coordinator
184649v2
Sherburne County
By_________________________ Date:_______
Board of Commissioners Chair
ATTEST:
____________________________Date:_______
County Coordinator
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
1
3A.PublicHearing-ConsiderationtoadoptResolution#2015-090establishingthefinal
TaxLevyfor2016 (WO)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
CityCouncilandstaffmetseveraltimestodiscusstheCity’sproposed2016budgetand
taxlevy.Asaresult,theCouncilapproveda2015preliminarylevyof$8,925,000,which
wascertifiedtoWrightCountyforthetaxnoticesthatweremailedinNovember.
Theproposedtaxlevyof$8,925,000is$390,000(4.6%)higherthanthe2015finallevy.
Thebelowgraphreflectsthelevyoverthelasttenyears.populationandconsumerprice
index(CPI)indicators.
Thebelowgraphcomparestheactuallevy,aconsumerpriceindex(CPI)adjustedlevy
andpopulationcounts.Currentyearannualizedinflationisanegative.3percentand2016
inflationisestimatedat2%.
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
2
Thefollowingscheduledisplaystheallocationofthelevyovervariousfunds:
Forinitialbudgetingpurposes,staffusedabasetaxlevytargetof$8,925,000.Thebase
levyrepresentsa$390,000(4.6%)increaseoverthe2015finallevyandincludesGeneral
Fundadd-insof$72kforabuildinginspectorand$72k($119ktotal)forapublicworks
director.Withouttheadd-ins,theGeneralFundportionofthetaxlevyincreasesby
1.8%.Indeed,thecouncilcanjudgethevalidityandworthofeachadd-inandadjustthe
preliminarylevyorchoosetofinanceotherprioritiesthroughGeneralFundexpenditure
ortransfertoanotherfund.Inflationinthelawenforcementcontractadds$43,800for
2016.
Thetaxcapacityratechangesfor2013-2016forthethreemaintaxingauthoritiesisas
follows:
2013 2014 2015 2016
Property Property Property Property %$$
Fund Taxes Taxes Taxes Taxes Change Change
GeneralFund $5,540,000$5,882,000$5,882,000$6,177,000 5.0%$295,000
CommunityCenter-Operating 295,000 350,000 358,000 364,000 1.7%6,000
CommunityCenter-Debt 875,000 1,013,000 1,005,000 --100.0%(1,005,000)
2014GOJudgmentBonds ---$544,000 ---544,000
2015/16StreetBonds*---$550,000 ---550,000
2005A/2011AGOIBF 245,000 330,000 330,000 330,000 0.0%-
2007AGOIBF 425,000 420,000 420,000 420,000 0.0%-
2008AGOSewerRefunding 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 0.0%-
2010AGOIBF 20,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 0.0%-
Total $7,900,000$8,535,000$8,535,000$8,925,000 4.6%$390,000
*Thisamountrepresentscurrentandfuturedebt,with$300,000goingintotheCapitalProjectsFundin2016.
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
3
Contributingtothedecreaseinthetaxcapacityrateisthenuclearpowerplant$82M
increaseinestimatedmarketvaluefor2015.Thisincreasefollowsa$251Mincreasefor
taxyear2015.
ThecityofMonticellohasthelowesttaxcapacityratesinWrightCounty.
A1.BudgetImpact:Thelevyprovidessignificantresourcesforoperationsanddebt
service.Theimpactisthelevyamount($8,925,000).
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Thebudgetshouldservestaffasaguidetoexpenditure
limitsfor2016,buthasnoworkloadimpact.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoadoptResolution2015-090establishingtheCitypropertytaxlevyfor
2016at$8,925,000andtheHRAlevyfor2016at$280,000.
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
4
2.MotiontoadoptaResolutiontoestablishthepropertytaxlevyintheamountof
$_____________,whichcannotexceed$8,925,000andanHRAlevyof,which
cannotexceed$280,000.
3.Motiontonotadoptthe2016taxlevyatthistime.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1,whichsetsthepropertytaxlevyat$8,535,000.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
•Resolution#2015-090
PowerPointpresentationtobehandedoutatthemeeting
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2015-090
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE 2016 PROPERTY TAX LEVY AND
AUTHORIZING CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN DEFERRED TAX LEVIES
WHEREAS, the Finance Director has prepared and submitted to the City Council a budget setting
forth therein his estimated needs of the City of Monticello for operations, capital improvements
and debt service for the fiscal year commencing January 1, 2016; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the same and has made such changes therein as appear
to be in the best interest of the City of Monticello;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Monticello as
follows:
SECTION I. There is hereby levied upon all taxable property in the City of Monticello
a direct ad valorem tax collectible in 201 6 for the following purposes and in the following
amounts:
SECTION II. There is hereby levied $280,000 upon all taxable real property within
the City of Monticello a special benefit tax, collectible in 2016, under Section 469.033, subd. 6,
of the HRA Act (HRA levy):
SECTION III. It is hereby determined that sufficient monies are now on hand, or will
be when needed, for the payment of principal and interest to come due during the year 2016 for
certain bond issues outstanding of the City of Monticello.
SECTION III. The Treasurer-Auditor of Wright County is hereby authorized and
REVENUE NET CERTIFIED LEVY
General 6,177,000$
Community Center 364,000$
Capital Projects 300,000$
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
G.O. Bonds, Series 2007A 420,000$
G.O. Bonds, Series 2008B 500,000$
G.O. Bonds, Series 2010A 40,000$
G.O. Bonds, Series 2011A 330,000$
G.O. Bonds, Series 2013A -$
G.O. Bonds, Series 2014A 544,000$
G.O. Bonds, Series 2015B 250,000$
TOTAL TAX LEVY 8,925,000$
directed, pursuant to the provisions of Section 475.61, Minnesota Statutes Annotated, to cancel or
otherwise amend the levies for said indebtedness heretofore made to be levied in the year 2015 for
collection in the year 2016 as follows:
SECTION IV. The City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this
resolution to the Treasurer-Auditor of Wright County, Minnesota.
ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 14th day of December, 2015.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
___________________________________
Brian Stumpf, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Jeff O’Neill, City Administrator
The above resolution was introduced by Councilmember __________ and was duly seconded by
Councilmember ___________.
The following voting in favor:
.
The following voted in opposition:
Bond 2016 Levy
Debt Service Levies Resolution Levy Added (Canceled)
G.O. Bonds, Series 2007A 300,506$ 420,000$ 119,494$
G.O. Bonds, Series 2008B 1,048,602 500,000 (548,602)
G.O. Bonds, Series 2010A 220,332 40,000 (180,332)
G.O. Bonds, Series 2011A 175,522 330,000 154,478
G.O. Bonds, Series 2013A 69,048 - (69,048)
G.O. Bonds, Series 2014A 609,915 $544,000 (65,915)
G.O. Bonds, Series 2015B 199,980 250,000 50,020
Total 2,623,905$ 2,084,000$ (539,905)$
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly passed,
adopted and approved by the Monticello City Council at their scheduled meeting on December 14,
2015, and recorded in minutes of said meeting.
____________________________________
Jeff O’Neill, City Administrator
Notary Public: _______________________________
Date: ___________________________
(STAMP)
1
Important Dates
2
TNT Summary Chart for Taxes Payable 2016
Date Action
On or Before Sept.
30 (Wednesday)
At one meeting, the city council adopts the proposed property tax levy and announces the time
and place of a future city council meeting at which the budget and levy will be discussed and
public input allowed, prior to final budget and levy determination. This public input meeting must
occur after Nov. 24 and must start at or after 6 p.m. The time and place of the public input
meeting must be included in the minutes but newspaper publication of the minutes is not
required. (Regular meeting -September 28th)
On or before Sept.
30
Cities must provide the county auditor with the following information:
The time and place of the meeting at which the budget and levy will be discussed and public
input allowed. (Again, meeting must occur after Nov. 24 and must not start before 6 p.m.)
A phone number that city tax payers may call if they have questions related to the auditor’s
property tax notice; this does not require listing a private phone number.
An address where comments will be received by mail; this does not require listing a private
address.
Nov. 11 to Nov. 24 County auditor prepares and sends parcels specific notices.
Nov. 25 to Dec. 28 City councils hold meeting to discuss the budget and property tax levy and, before a final
determination, allows public input.(Regular meeting -December 14th)
On or before Dec.
28.
Cities must certify final property tax levy to the county auditor.
Tax Levy History
3
Tax Capacity and Tax Levy
4
Schedule of Tax Capacity (Values and Rates) and Tax Levy
Tax Capacity Tax Capacity Tax TC Value TC Rate Levy
Year Value Rate Levy Change %Change %Change %
2000 13,066,057$ 36.272 4,739,325$ -0.4%3.1%2.6%
2001 13,641,431$ 37.146 5,067,342$ 4.4%2.4%6.9%
2002 9,606,212$ 67.645 6,498,079$ -29.6%82.1%28.2%
2003 10,344,950$ 65.218 6,782,018$ 7.7%-3.6%4.4%
2004 11,141,052$ 62.421 6,957,915$ 7.7%-4.3%2.6%
2005 11,840,000$ 58.651 6,957,915$ 6.3%-6.0%0.0%
2006 13,224,144$ 51.028 6,750,000$ 11.7%-13.0%-3.0%
2007 15,257,996$ 42.458 6,500,000$ 15.4%-16.8%-3.7%
2008 16,190,597$ 46.942 7,600,000$ 6.1%10.6%16.9%
2009 16,783,843$ 46.191 7,750,000$ 3.7%-1.6%2.0%
2010 16,691,266$ 45.822 7,648,272$ -0.6%-0.8%-1.3%
2011 16,429,431$ 46.729 7,677,309$ -1.6%2.0%0.4%
2012 15,771,688$ 49.773 7,850,000$ -4.0%6.5%2.2%
2013 18,692,762$ 42.262 7,900,000$ 18.5%-15.1%0.6%
2014 18,229,025$ 44.709 8,150,000$ -2.5%5.8%3.2%
2015 23,882,689$ 35.737 8,535,000$ 31.0%-20.1%4.7%
2016 25,869,170$ 34.501 8,925,000$ 8.3%-3.5%4.6%
Tax Capacity and Tax Levy (+HRA)
5
Schedule of Tax Capacity (Values and Rates) and Tax Levy
Tax Capacity Tax Capacity Tax TC Value TC Rate Levy
Year Value Rate Levy Change %Change %Change %
2000 13,066,057$ 36.272 4,739,325$ -0.4%3.1%2.6%
2001 13,641,431$ 37.146 5,067,342$ 4.4%2.4%6.9%
2002 9,606,212$ 67.645 6,498,079$ -29.6%82.1%28.2%
2003 10,344,950$ 65.218 6,782,018$ 7.7%-3.6%4.4%
2004 11,141,052$ 62.421 6,957,915$ 7.7%-4.3%2.6%
2005 11,840,000$ 58.651 6,957,915$ 6.3%-6.0%0.0%
2006 13,224,144$ 51.028 6,750,000$ 11.7%-13.0%-3.0%
2007 15,257,996$ 42.458 6,500,000$ 15.4%-16.8%-3.7%
2008 16,190,597$ 46.942 7,600,000$ 6.1%10.6%16.9%
2009 16,783,843$ 46.191 7,750,000$ 3.7%-1.6%2.0%
2010 16,691,266$ 45.822 7,648,272$ -0.6%-0.8%-1.3%
2011 16,429,431$ 46.729 7,677,309$ -1.6%2.0%0.4%
2012 15,771,688$ 49.773 7,850,000$ -4.0%6.5%2.2%
2013 18,692,762$ 42.262 7,900,000$ 18.5%-15.1%0.6%
2014 18,229,025$ 44.709 8,150,000$ -2.5%5.8%3.2%
2015 23,882,689$ 35.737 8,535,000$ 31.0%-20.1%4.7%
2016 25,869,170$ 35.583 9,205,000$ 8.3%-0.4%7.9%
Tax Base Changes
Nuclear plant value is $80M higher
Building permits issued $20M (2014)
Two minor TIF district certification
6
Tax Levy
7
Tax Levy
8
Tax Levy Comparison
9
CITY 2015 Levy 2016 Levy Change $Change %
ALBERTVILLE 3,497,147 3,671,240 174,093 5.0%
ANNANDALE 1,354,519 1,416,877 62,358 4.6%
BUFFALO 5,839,678 6,515,502 675,824 11.6%
CLEARWATER 914,869 956,060 41,191 4.5%
COKATO 1,183,358 1,204,962 21,604 1.8%
DELANO 2,736,950 2,892,368 155,418 5.7%
HANOVER 1,308,954 1,410,972 102,018 7.8%
HOWARD LAKE 749,095 772,346 23,251 3.1%
MAPLE LAKE 896,079 935,028 38,949 4.3%
MONTICELLO 8,535,000 8,925,000 390,000 4.6%
MONTICELLO + HRA 8,535,000 9,205,000 670,000 7.9%
MONTROSE 908,548 953,382 44,834 4.9%
OTSEGO 4,680,000 5,020,206 340,206 7.3%
ROCKFORD 1,547,369 1,588,107 40,738 2.6%
SOUTH HAVEN 114,270 119,984 5,714 5.0%
ST MICHAEL 5,403,694 5,563,694 160,000 3.0%
WAVERLY 854,341 854,341 0 0.0%
State wide: Cities = 5.2%, Counties = 3.7% (Wright = 4.7%)
Tax Levy Comparison
10
Tax Levy, CPI, Per Capita Tax
11
Schedule of Tax Levies 2003-2016
Increase/Percent Percent Levy with Per Capita
Year Actual Levy (Decrease)Change CPI Diff CPI Levy Difference Tax
2003 6,782,018$ 283,939$ 4.4%1.9%2.5%6,621,543$ 160,475$ 694$
2004 6,957,915$ 175,897$ 2.6%2.4%0.2%6,780,460$ 177,455$ 681$
2005 6,957,915$ -$ 0.0%3.2%-3.2%6,997,435$ (39,520)$ 653$
2006 6,750,000$ (207,915)$ -3.0%2.4%-5.4%7,165,373$ (415,373)$ 606$
2007 6,500,000$ (250,000)$ -3.7%2.7%-6.4%7,358,838$ (858,838)$ 578$
2008 7,600,000$ 1,100,000$ 16.9%3.7%13.2%7,631,115$ (31,115)$ 669$
2009 7,750,000$ 150,000$ 2.0%-0.6%2.6%7,585,329$ 164,671$ 675$
2010 7,648,272$ (101,728)$ -1.3%2.0%-3.3%7,737,035$ (88,763)$ 665$
2011 7,667,309$ 19,037$ 0.2%3.2%-3.0%7,984,620$ (317,311)$ 601$
2012 7,850,000$ 182,691$ 2.4%2.0%0.4%8,144,313$ (294,313)$ 611$
2013 7,900,000$ 50,000$ 0.6%1.4%-0.8%8,258,333$ (358,333)$ 612$
2014 8,150,000$ 250,000$ 3.2%1.5%1.7%8,382,208$ (232,208)$ 627$
2015 8,535,000$ 385,000$ 4.7%-0.3%5.0%8,357,061$ 177,939$ 650$
2016 9,205,000$ 670,000$ 7.9%2.0%5.9%8,524,203$ 680,797$ 694$
Tax Capacity –Values and Rates
12
Power Plant
13
Power Plant
14
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Estimated Market Value 213,300,800$ 377,028,900$ 346,559,800$ 597,753,900$ 680,037,200$
163,728,100$ (30,469,100)$ 251,194,100$ 82,283,300$
77%-8%72%14%
Wright County 1,853,668$ 3,339,571$ 3,010,427$ 4,856,152$ 5,432,818$
Change over prior year $1,485,903$ (329,144)$ 1,845,725$ 576,666$
Change over prior year %80%-10%61%12%
City of Monticello 2,123,324$ 3,186,799$ 3,096,661$ 4,271,788$ 4,691,849$
Change over prior year $1,063,475$ (90,138)$ 1,084,989$ 1,595,187$
Change over prior year %50%-3%34%52%
State General 46,851$ 98,512$ 98,055$ 172,341$ 91,632$
Change over prior year $51,662$ (457)$ 74,286$ (80,709)$
Change over prior year %110%0%76%-47%
Monticello ISD 882
Voter Approved Levy 1,111,255$ 1,833,117$ 1,650,161$ 623,519$ 537,024$
Other Local Levies 568,702$ 936,387$ 967,084$ 3,105,569$ 2,698,457$
Change over prior year $1,089,546$ (152,259)$ 1,111,843$ (493,607)$
Change over prior year %65%-5%42%-13%
Monti HRA 147,160.05
Special Taxing District 52,899$ 45,847$ -$ -$ -$
Total 5,756,698$ 9,440,232$ 8,822,388$ 13,029,369$ 13,598,940$
Change over prior year $3,683,534$ (617,844)$ 3,589,137$ 569,571$
Change over prior year %64%-7%38%4%
Power Plant
15
Tax Levy
16
Tax Diff. w/
Taxing Authority Rate County
Wright County Rate 39.945 -
City of Monticello 34.497 -5.448
City of St. Michael 37.748 -2.197
City of Otsego 37.890 -2.055
City of Hanover 48.366 8.421
City of Albertville 52.364 12.419
City of Delano 53.481 13.536
City of Montrose 54.595 14.650
City of Buffalo 54.847 14.902
City of Rockford 56.633 16.688
City of Dayton 57.093 17.148
City of Maple Lake 59.225 19.280
City of Annandale 68.913 28.968
City of Howard Lake 71.601 31.656
City of Clearwater 75.770 35.825
City of Cokato 77.718 37.773
City of Waverly 83.285 43.340
City of South Haven 134.182 94.237
Local Property Tax by Entity
17
2016
Authority Property Tax Compare
City 9,205,000$ 1,128,000$
County 10,333,000$
Difference 1,128,000$
Residential
18
Commercial
19
Preliminary Tax Levy
20
* Incudes $1,040,000 for MCC Debt.
Tax Levy By Fund
21
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Property Property Property Property Property %$$
Fund Taxes Taxes Taxes Taxes Taxes Change Change
General Fund $5,456,248 $5,540,000 $5,882,000 $5,882,000 $6,177,000 5.0%$295,000
MCC - Debt 890,000 875,000 1,013,000 1,005,000 - -100.0%(1,005,000)
2014 GO Judgment Bonds - - - - $544,000 ---544,000
2015/16 Street Bonds - - - - $550,000 ---550,000
MCC - Operating 260,000 295,000 350,000 358,000 364,000 1.7%6,000
2005A/2011A GO IBF 251,906 245,000 330,000 330,000 330,000 0.0%-
2007A GO IBF 416,846 425,000 420,000 420,000 420,000 0.0%-
2008A GO Sewer Refunding 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 0.0%-
2010A GO IBF 50,000 20,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 0.0%-
Street Reconstruction 25,000 - - - - ----
Total $7,850,000 $7,900,000 $8,535,000 $8,535,000 $8,925,000 4.6%$390,000
Total debt levies increased 3.6%
Debt Service Levy
22
General Fund
23
General Fund
24
General Fund
25
General Fund
26
GENERAL FUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
Property Taxes 5,669,969$ 5,580,437$ 5,507,285$ 5,882,000$ 6,177,000$ 5.0%
Tax Increments - - - - - ---
Franchise & Other Taxes 237,022 241,664 237,173 236,500 283,900 20.0%
Licenses & Permits 275,198 331,136 378,809 396,180 338,900 5.5%
Intergovernmental Revenues 304,395 373,482 321,891 299,677 301,177 0.5%
Charges for Services 310,307 280,288 318,278 267,261 267,664 0.2%
Fines & Forfeits 63,106 41,124 48,744 42,100 42,100 0.0%
Special Assessments 10,349 22,351 22,808 300 300 0.0%
Miscellaneous 491,770 117,863 330,858 196,982 184,959 -6.1%
Operating Transfers 1,729 - - - - ---
TOTAL REVENUES 7,363,845$ 6,988,345$ 7,165,846$ 7,321,000$ 7,596,000$ 4.8%
EXPENDITURES
Personnel Services 2,710,939$ 2,589,353$ 2,555,898$ 2,734,757$ 2,979,264$ 8.9%
Supplies 482,080 520,328 534,655 580,800 662,900 14.1%
Other Services & Charges 3,366,417 3,291,073 3,256,898 3,570,773 3,710,936 3.9%
Capital Outlay - 59,535 108,900 195,600 242,900 24.2%
Operating Transfers 2,326,995 92,000 293,000 164,070 - -100.0%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8,886,431$ 6,552,289$ 6,749,351$ 7,246,000$ 7,596,000$ 4.8%
FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 5,001,093$ 3,478,507$ 3,914,563$ 4,331,058$ 4,406,058$
Excess (Deficiency) of
Revenues over Expenditures (1,522,586) 436,056 416,495 75,000 -
FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 3,478,507$ 3,914,563$ 4,331,058$ 4,406,058$ 4,406,058$
General Fund
27
General Fund
28
1.Election -$20,000
2.Refuse & recycling -$31,000
3.PW director -$72,000 (119,000)
4.Building inspector -$72,000
5.Wage increase $109,000 (step + market adj.)
Questions/Concerns?
29
Community Center
30
Community Center 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET CHANGE
Property Taxes $307,239 $306,335 $348,404 $358,000 364,000$ 1.7%
Licenses & Permits - - - - - ---
Intergovernmental Revenues - - - - - ---
Charges for Services 1,106,158 1,279,363 1,312,825 1,391,300 1,387,110 -0.3%
Fines & Forfeits - - - - - ---
Special Assessments - - - - - ---
Miscellaneous 58,969 24,701 14,534 53,750 28,216 -47.5%
Operating Transfers 850,000 175,000 50,000 - - ---
TOTAL REVENUES $2,322,366 $1,785,399 $1,725,763 $1,803,050 $1,779,326 -1.3%
EXPENDITURES
Personnel Services 923,264$ 969,868$ 963,780$ 1,002,065$ 1,060,173$ 5.8%
Supplies 173,306 278,327 182,906 261,396 201,600 -22.9%
Other Services & Charges 361,638 368,035 409,453 460,589 447,553 -2.8%
Capital Outlay 1,662,666 77,465 - 79,000 70,000 -11.4%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,120,874$ 1,693,695$ 1,556,139$ 1,803,050$ 1,779,326$ -1.3%
FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 1,155,850$ 357,342$ 449,046$ 618,670$ 618,670$
Excess (Deficiency) of
Revenues over Expenditures (798,508) 91,704 169,624 -$ -$
FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 357,342$ 449,046$ 618,670$ 618,670$ 618,670$
Community Center
31
Tax Levy
32
Animal Control
33
Revenues
Animal Licenses 401$ 585$ 273$ 440$ 258$
Animal Pemits - - 100 75 50
Boarding Fees 33,159 27,139 28,755 29,024 34,462
Impound Fines 205 85 145 225 400
Total 33,765 27,809 29,273 29,764 35,170
Expenditures
Animal control services 36,483 36,483 36,483 38,250 38,250
Operating supplies 1,902 2,876 3,795 3,363 3,273
Miscellaneous Professional 1,010 1,000 900 220 488
Internal Services 1,242 1,218 500 356 659
Travel Expenses 1,110 1,452 1,254 1,339 1,982
LPV Insurance 1,244 1,056
Electric 1,076 1,246 1,084 1,060 836
Water/Sewer 274 379 625 556 498
Gas 947 1,004 713 1,038 1,153
Repairs & Maintenance 518 170 4,240
Total 44,561 45,829 49,595 47,426 48,195
Net (10,796)$ (18,020)$ (20,322)$ (17,662)$ (13,025)$
Animal Control
34
Animal Control
Entity Boardings Charges
Otsego 76 10,260$
Monticello*60 400$
Albertville 34 4,590$
Dayton 33 4,455$
Rogers 30 4,050$
Big Lake Twp 28 3,780$
St. Michael 28 3,780$
Becker Twp 20 2,742$
Big Lake City 11 1,485$
Becker City 2 270$
Hanover 1 135$
Total 323 35,947$
Leadership
Adopted
Recommended
Requested
35
Firsts Revisited
1.Bond Default ($26.4m) and Settlement ($5.75m)
2.Combined Debt Service Fund (Transfers/Loans)
3.Interfund Loans ($6m)
4.Fund Types (Impact, DMV, Cemetery)
5.Investment Horizon (20-30yrs -$1m MVA)
6.Prior Period Adjustment ($590k and $3.2m)
7.Lack of Institutional Control (Regained)
8.Declined Insurance on Bonds (A2)
1.$5,925,667
2.$5,821,220
3.774,002
4.$436,056
5.2
6.1
7.1/3
8.0
By the Numbers
MCC
SECTION 5. OTHER BUDGET AUTHORIZING
ACTIONS:
a.Establishes a revenue recovery policy for the
community center where customer charges shall provide for
85%of operating costs and on-going capital and non-capital
items, such as equipment acquisitions and repairs and
maintenance.
38
Setting CIP Priorities
Priority I: Imperative (MUST-DO)-Projects
that cannot reasonably be postponed in
order to avoid harmful or otherwise
undesirable consequences.
Priority II: Essential (SHOULD-DO)-
Projects that address clearly
demonstrated needs or objectives.
Priority III: Important (COULD-DO)-
Projects that benefit the community but
may be delayed without detrimental
effects to basic services.
39
Priority 1: Imperative
Corrects a condition dangerous to public
health or safety
Satisfies a legal obligation (law, regulation,
court order, contract)
Alleviates an emergency service disruption
or deficiency
Prevents irreparable damage to a valuable
public facility
40
Priority 2: Essential
Rehabilitates or replaces an obsolete
public facility or attachment thereto
Stimulates economic growth and private
capital investment
Reduces future operating and maintenance
costs
Leverages available State or Federal
funding
41
Priority 3: Important
Provides a new or expanded level of
service
Promotes intergovernmental cooperation
Reduces energy consumption
Enhances cultural or natural resources
42
1.Bond Default –Settlement
2.Combined Debt Service Fund -Transfers/Loans
3.Interfund Loans –None for last two years
4.Impact Funds –Water and sewage closed
5.Investment Horizon –Market value adjust
6.Prior Period Adjustment –Again in 2013
Firsts Revisited
Great Organizations
A Relentless Culture of Discipline:
Disciplined people engaged in
Disciplined thought who take
Disciplined action.
Jim Collins, Good to Great and the Social Sectors
44
Questions/Concerns?
45
Capital Items
1.Hunters Crossing Park = $85,000
2.Fallon Pathway = $85,000
3.Liquor checkout and shelves = $50,000
4.Liquor store parking lot replacement = $75,000
5.Rural outlying and intercity streets = $400,000
6.TH25/CSAH 75 Intersection = $1,992,000
7.TH25/85th turn lanes and signal = $303,100
8.School Blvd & Trail = $550,000
46
Lack of Institutional Control
1.No Budget for FiberNet Fund
2.Credit Card Issues
3.No Access to Billing System Vendor
MCC Debt Service and Levy
48
165,000 Added Levy
49
5 homes all worth the same.
50
Levy
Each House pay $1
6 homes all worth the same
51
Levy
Each House pay $.83
6 homes all worth the same
52
Levy
Each House pay $1.00
Budget is Policy
Policy is about Leadership
and Stewardship.
53
Leadership
Leadership is a process of social
influence in which one person can enlist
the aid and support the others in the
accomplishment of a common task.
54
Stewardship
Stewardship is carefully and
responsibly managing the economic
assets entrusted to our care.
55
Capital Items
1.7th Street = $1,544,800
2.Treatment Plant Improvements = $6,100,000
3.West-East Bridge Lighting = $70,000
4.Liquor Checkout and Shelves = $50,000
5.Water/Wastewater SCADA = $150,000
6.Water/Wastewater System = $300,000
7.Bertram Land = $550,000
8.Pathway Maintenance = $50,000
9.Battery Backup Traffic Signal = $70,000
56
7th Street Extension
Preliminary Opinion of Estimated Costs:
Street and Pathway (1,400 LF)$549,000
Storm Sewer $154,000
Sanitary Sewer $89,200
Watermain $181,600
Street Lights $96,300
Trees $15,000
Stormwater Pond Grading $159,700
Site Grading (15.6 Acres)$300,000
TOTAL $1,544,800
57
Challenge -2
2005A G.O. Bond has $1.7M special
assessments that are not being paid
(Bowers-Chadwick).
Assessments were levied in 2010.
Annual Amount: $240,722
58
Challenge -3
Water Access Fund is Dry.
59
Year Amount
2013 $363,500
2014 362,870
2015 361,820
2016 361,820
2017 50,600
2018 50,600
2019 50,600
2020 50,600
2021 50,600
Total $1,703,010
$1.1M
Challenge -4
Sanitary Sewer Access Fund is currently
projected to have an 2013 ending balance of
$677K.
60
Year Amount
2014 1,282,540$
2015 1,281,504
2016 1,281,504
2017 578,000
2018 578,000
2019 128,000
2020 128,000
2021 128,000
Total $5,385,548
$1.9M
Debt Service Levy
61
Debt Service Levy
City of Monticello, Minnesota
Schedule of Debt Levies
Year 2010A Imp.2005A Imp 2007A Imp.2008 Sewer 2008A MCC Total
2011 52,000$ 244,131$ 418,306$ 430,000$ 815,000$ 1,959,437$
2012 50,000 251,906 416,846 500,000 890,000 2,108,752
2013 25,000 245,000 420,000 500,000 875,000 2,065,000
2014 25,000 248,000 420,000 500,000 1,037,000 2,230,000
2015 25,000 205,000 420,000 500,000 1,001,000 2,151,000
2016 25,000 207,000 420,000 500,000 1,152,000
2017 25,000 206,000 420,000 500,000 1,151,000
2018 25,000 215,000 420,000 500,000 1,160,000
2019 25,000 185,000 210,000
2020 25,000 185,000 210,000
2021 25,000 183,000 208,000
2022 25,000 187,000 212,000
2023 185,000 185,000
62
SpecialCityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
1
4A.ConsiderationtoadoptOrdinance#628amendingtheCityFeeSchedulefor2016
andadoptingSummaryOrdinance#628Aforpublication (JS/WO/JO)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
ThefeesforservicesperformedbytheCityareestablishedbyordinanceand
incorporatedintotheannualCityFeeSchedule.Everyyear,staffreviewsthesefeesto
makesurethefeeschargedareinlinewithwhattheservicecostsorisnecessaryto
providetheservice.Attachedistheproposed2016FeeSchedulebasedonCounciland
staffreviewofthesefees.Thechangestothefeesschedulethatarebeingrecommended
areinred.
Followingareafewitemswithfurtherexplanationprovided:
•AnimalControl –TheCityisimplementinga$250boardingaccessfeeper
entityandincreasingthedailyboardingrateby$2.
•Cemetery–Bothresidentialandnonresidentialplatpriceswereincreasedto
reflecteconomicconditions.
•CommunityCenter–TheCommunityCenterAdvisoryBoardisrecommending
anincreasetotheFamilyMembershiptypeforonlyneworlapsedmemberships.
Familymembershipcomprise53%ofMCC’stotalmembershipswiththeSilver
SneakersandSilverandFitmembershipsforseniorscomprisinganother24%of
themembershipbase.Thetwotypesofmembershipscombinedequal77%ofthe
totalmembershipbase.TheBoardagreedthattheindividualorseniorratewas
verycompetitiveatthistimewiththecommunity.Thiswillalsocreateagreater
costtofamiliesoverwhatanindividualmembershipcosts.TheBoard
recommendedraisingtheGrandfatheredor“Legacy”membershipratesin2017
andlooktoalternateyearsmovingforward.
TheChildcareadd-onhasbeenextremelysuccessful.Atthecurrentrateitisjust
coveringthecostsforchildcare.ThereforetheBoardrecommendedraisingthe
Childcareadd-onto$permonthperchildfrom$6effectiveJanuary1,2016
•CommunityDevelopment/Building–
Surveys–TheBuildingDepartmentcharges$12toretrieveandcopy
certificatesofsurveyasrequested.Thisfeehasbeenchargedinthepast
buthasnotbeenontheactualfeeschedule.Therewasrequestin2015by
anindividualaskingtheCitytoeliminatethisfee.Henotedthatinsome
othercities,surveyscanbeobtainedatnocharge.Pleasenotethereare
alsocitieswherethereisachargeforfindingandcopyingsurveys.Staff
recommendationistocontinuetochargeforthisserviceandtoformalize
itonthefeescheduleaccordingly.
LaborforCommunityDevelopment/Projects–Adjustedbasedon2016
engineeringlaborrates.
SpecialCityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
2
LandscapingSecurity-Thezoningordinancerequiresasecurityfor
landscapingimprovements.Thefeescheduleisnowconsistentwiththat
requirement,allowingeitheracashorletterofcreditsecurity.
ResidentialBuildingEscrow:Staffisproposinga$2000perlotescrow
fornewresidentiallotdevelopment,whichwillbehelduntilcompletion
ofas-builtsurvey,individuallotlandscaping.Theescrowalsosecures
streetsweeping,loterosioncontrolandanydamagetopublic
improvements.FromtimetotimethereisdamagedonetoFNMfacilities
duringthegradingandhomeconstructionprocess.Paymentforrepairs
wouldbedrawnfromthisescrow.
•Engineering
PublicImprovementSecurity-Thesubdivisionordinancerequiresa
securityforpublicimprovements.Thefeescheduleisnowconsistentwith
thatrequirement,allowingeitheracashorletterofcreditsecurity.
•MiscellaneousItems–TheNotaryFeewentfrom$2to$3forCityHallandthe
DMV.
•PublicWorks –Variouslaborandequipmentchargeswereadjustedtoreflect
changesinservicedeliverycosts.
•SanitarySewer –Minimumnon-industrialratesincreaseby$1.00perquarter.
Thevolumeandstrengthchargesincreasebetween2and2.6%.
•Water –Minimumnon-industrialratesincreaseby$1.00perquarter.The
volumechargeincreasesapproximately2%.
A1.BudgetImpact:Theproposedfeeswouldincreasebudgetedrevenuesintheir
respectivebudgetsfor2016.Therewouldbeaminimalcosttopublisha
summaryofthefeeschedule.Thefullfeeschedulewillbeavailableonthecity’s
websiteorcanberequestedfromcityhallstaff.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Thisitemwouldhaveminimalstaffworkloadimpact.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
Decision1:
1.MotiontoadoptOrdinance#628approvingthe2016FeeScheduleassubmitted,
effectiveJanuary1,2065orasindicatedintheFeeSchedule.
2.MotiontoadoptOrdinance#628approvingthe2016FeeSchedulewith
additionalchangesasdirectedbyCouncil:_______________________________.
3.Motiontonotadoptthe2016feescheduleatthistime.
SpecialCityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
3
Decision2:
1.MotiontoadoptSummaryOrdinance#628Aprovidingforpublication.
Itshouldbenotedthatsummarypublicationrequiresa4/5th supermajorityvote
byCouncil.
2.MotiontonotadoptSummaryOrdinance#628Aforpublication.
Ifasummaryordinanceisnotadopted,thecityisrequiredtopublishthefullFee
Scheduleinthenewspaper.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffsupportsAlternative#1foreachdecision.IfCouncilwishestoconsider
additionalchangestotheFeeSchedule,thosechangeswouldbeincorporatedintothe
ordinanceaccordinglypercouncildirection.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
•Ordinance#628-proposed2016FeeSchedule
•SummaryOrdinance#628A
ORDINANCE NO. 628
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2016
TITLE 20 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS:
Section 1. Title 20 – Fee Schedule shall be amended as shown in the 2016 Fee Schedule in
Attachment “A.”
Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance
as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 20 – Fee Schedule, and to
renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended
effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary
corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process,
provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Monticello City
Code as has been adopted.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage
and publication. The ordinance in its entirety shall be posted on the City website
after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance are available online and at
Monticello City Hall for examination upon request.
ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 14th day of December, 2015.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
__________________________________
Brian Stumpf, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Jeff O’Neill, City Administrator
VOTING IN FAVOR:
VOTING IN OPPOSITION:
ABSENT:
ORDINANCE NO. 628
ATTACHMENT “A”
2016 CITY OF MONTICELLO FEE SCHEDULE
ANIMAL CONTROL #605, 12/8/14
Boarding Fee:$14/per day + tax $16
Boarding Access Fee $250 per entity $250
Dog License: Altered Pet $10 - 2 years $15
Unaltered Pet $15 - 2 years $20
Altered Pet $5.00 - 1 year $8
Unaltered Pet $7.50 - 1 year $10
Late Fee $5
Replacement Tag $1 + tax $2
Euthanization/Disposal Fee $37 per animal + tax $40
Licensed Unlicensed
Fine: Running at Large: First offense $25 $35
Second offense $35 $45
Third offense $50 $60
If impounded Add boarding fee (plus tax)
Permit for Keeping Fowl on Premises $50
Annual renewal for current permit $25
CEMETERY
Administrative Fee:$50 $75
Cremation Disinterment $75 $100
Flat Marker setting with 4" concrete border $150 $175
Frost Charge: (excavations December through March)$100
Grave Excavation Fee:
Weekday $400
Weekend $450
Infant Grave Excavation - Weekday $100
Infant Grave Excavation - Weekend $125
Cremation Grave Excavation - Weekday $80
Cremation Grave Excavation - Weekend $105
Grave Purchasing Fee:Resident Non-Resident
Full Grave (4'x12') Flush Marker Area $900 $1,100 $950 $1,150
Full Grave (4'x12') Raised Marker Area $1,000 $1,200 $1,050 $1,250
Infant Grave (2'x6')$300 $300 $300 $325
Cremation Grave (4'x4')$500 $600 $525 $625
Grave Staking Fee (monument or excavation):$50 $55
Grave Transfer Fee:$15
Memorial Plaque (Bronze) Stone:Cost + $10 + sales tax
Opening and closing of Niche:$50 $55
Perpetual Care Fee:
New Grave Sales Included in grave price (Maint. not taxable - Plant Care taxable)
Grave Sold Pre-1960 $100
Plant stand $35 (includes tax)
TITLE 20 - CHAPTER 1
2015 FEE SCHEDULE - CITY OF MONTICELLO
Fee Schedule Rates supercede amounts shown in city ordinances or policies which are dated prior to the fee schedule.
Monticello Fee Schedule - 2015 1
COMMUNITY CENTER
Membership Fees: (for new members)Resident Rate Regular Rate
Daily Pass
Junior/Senior $5.50 $6.50
Adult $6.50 $7.50
Family $21 $27.50
*Climbing wall is not included with Daily Pass.
3 Month Membership
Junior/Senior $76 $93
Adult $104 $127
Dual Senior $122 $150
Family $162 $185 $177 $200
Annual Membership (Paid in full Options)
Junior/Senior $208 $277
Adult $277 $358
Dual Senior $335 $446
Family $404 $491 $454 $541
Continuous Membership (Monthly Payment Option**)
Junior/Senior $20 $26
Adult $29.50 $35
Dual Senior $32.50 $42
Family $41 $46 $46 $50
**Automatic Withdrawal
Cancellation fee applies if within 12 months of joining.
Childcare - option with Membership $6/month for each child $8
Unlimited Fitness Classes - option with Membership $15/month per person
All current MCC members will see an increase of 10% on their membership fees.
Corporate Memberships (Quarterly Rate)JR/SR ADULT FAMILY Family Only
Level 1 51.00$ 68.00$ 99.00$ $111.25
Level 2 50.00$ 66.50$ 97.00$ $109.00
Level 3 49.00$ 65.00$ 95.00$ $106.75
Level 4 48.00$ 63.50$ 93.00$ $104.50
Level 5 47.00$ 62.50$ 91.00$ $102.25
Special Passes: Resident Rate Regular Rate
Climbing Pass (5 uses)--$23
Splash Pass (10 uses) - Junior $46 $46
Splash Pass (10 uses) - Adult $46 $52.50
Indoor Play Pass (10 uses)$21 $31.50
Court Pass - Gymnasium (10 uses) - Junior $35 $40
Court Pass - Gymnasium (10 uses) - Adult $40 $46
Group X Class Pass (10 uses) $55 $75
Special Rates:
Climbing Wall Daily Fee - Junior --$5.50
Climbing Wall Daily Fee - Adult --$6.50
Indoor Play Area $2.75 $3.75
Public Skate - Children 5-17 --$3
Public Skate - Adult --$4
Discounted Swim Rates - Junior/Adult --$4
Group Rates - Junior --$5
Group Rates - Adult --$6
Shower Only --$3.50
Group X Class Drop-In $6.50 $9
Silver Sneakers Drop-In --$4
Pickle Ball Drop-In --$3
Contact Community Center for rates on Birthday Parties, Swim Lessons, and Corporate Memberships
Monticello Fee Schedule - 2015 2
Gymnasium Rental Rates:
Gym - prime time $58/hour
Gym - non prime time $40/hour
Full Kitchen $91/hour
Energy Fee $83/hour
Early set up fee $57/hour
Damage Deposit 1/2 of rental fees
Hourly Room Rental Rates (2 hour minimum required):Resident Regular Non-Profit
Boom Island Room $16 $18 $14
Bridge Room (full)$24 $29 $21
N. or S. Bridge Room $15 $17 $12
River Room $12 $16 $10
Warehouse Room - Weekday $28 $33 $21
Warehouse Room - Weekend $33 $40 $28
Mississippi Room:Private Resident Private Regular Business Resident Business Regular
Half Room Rental $52 $63 $40 $57
Full Room Rental $73 $88 $61 $80
Rental event with alcohol (not weddings):Resident Regular Organization
(2 hour minimum - reserve within 3 months of event)$152 per hour $166 per hour $140 per hour
Hostess Fee:$25/hour
Locker fees:$5/month per locker
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - BUILDING
County Assessor Fees: Building Valuation $499,999 or less $25
Building Valuation $500,000 or more $100
Building Inspection (non-permit related):$50/hour $55
$12.50 minimum charge for 15 minutes or less
Building Permit Fees:106% of 1997 State recommended schedule
Building Permit Surcharge:use state-mandated fee
Contractor License Check Fee:$25 $30
Building Permit/Records - Duplicate $50/hour $55
$12.50 minimum charge for 15 minutes or less
Blight Processing Fee $50 (per parcel)$55
Demolition Permit:106% of 1997 State recommended schedule
Permit is issued under a building permit (follow same procedures as issuing a building permit). Prior to demolition permit issuance
verify with Public Works. Contractor must arrange disconnection: 1) Sanitary sewer; 2) City water & retrieve water mater and 3) approve
routing for trucks and heavy equipment, (if applicable). Excavation permit may also be required.
Fire Alarm/Fire Sprinkler System 106% of 1997 State Recommended Schedule
Master Plan Review:25% of building permit fee
Mechanical Permits: Residential $45 base + $9/fixture + state surcharge
Commercial 1.25% of valuation + state surcharge, minimum $100 + state surcharge
Mechanical Surcharge .0005 X valuation; minimum $5 (state mandated)
Mobile Home Permit $150 $180
Moving Buildings:$150 + expense + demolition permit
Plan Review:65% of building permit fee
Plumbing Permits: Residential $45 base + $9/fixture ("Fixture" includes such things as traps, toilets,
floor drains, sinks, showers)
Commercial 1.25% of valuation + state surcharge, minimum $100 + state surcharge
Plumbing Surcharge:.0005 X valuation; minimum $5 (state mandated)
Monticello Fee Schedule - 2015 3
Rental Housing License Fee:$45/per building + $15 for each dwelling unit within the building
Rental Housing License Application/Late Fee:Double the standard license fee
Rental Housing License Transfer Fee:$35
Residential Building Escrow:$2,000 (Held for completion of as-built survey, individual lot landscaping.
Also secures street sweeping, lot erosion control and any damage to
public improvements)
Sign Permits: Permanent $50 for first $1,000 of value (minimum fee $50)
$10 each additional $1,000 of value
Sign Permits: Temporary $35 $50
State Surcharge on Building Permits:
Valuation of Structure Addition or Alteration Surcharge Computation
$1,000,000 or less .0005 x valuation; minimum $5 (state mandated)
$1,000,000 to $2,000,000 $500 + .0004 x (Value - $1,000,000)
$2,000,000 to $3,000,000 $900 + .0003 x (Value - $2,000,000)
$3,000,000 to $4,000,000 $1200 + .0002 x (Value - $3,000,000)
$4,000,000 to $5,000,000 $1400 + .0001 x (Value - $4,000,000)
Greater than $5,000,000 $1500 + .00005 x (Value - $5,000,000)
Surveys: $12
Utility Locate Fee: Residential $40 $45
Commercial/Industrial $55 $60
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING/ZONING
Administrative Home Occupation Permit $50
Comprehensive Plan Amendment $200 + escrow (per chart)
Conditional Use Permit $200 + Escrow (per chart)
Escrow Chart - Land Use Application Plan Review Commercial Residential
0-3 acres $2,000 1 unit $500 (single family)
4-10 acres $6,000 2+ units $1000 base +
11+ acres $10,000 $100 per unit
*reconciled to actual costs for staff/consulting time after decision
Interim Use Permit:$200 + Escrow (per chart)
Labor (for Community Development/Projects):
Planner $155/hour
Engineer $143/hour (maximum)$147
Construction Inspector $105/hour (maximum)$105
Landscaping Security Letter of credit or cash based on statement of value of landscaping x 125%.
Park Dedication (residential)An amount of land equal to eleven percent (11%)
of the total gross land area of the plat shall be
presumptively defined as "reasonably commensurate."
In the event that the subdivider objects to the eleven
percent (11%) standard, the City shall, at the
developer's request and expense, conduct a
specific dedication study of the park system and
the demand placed on the system by the proposed plat.
Cash-in-Lieu: 11% of fair market value of the raw land to be
platted at the time of final plat. The city may require an
appraisal to determine market value of subject land being platted.
Parking Fund (CCD District)$4,500 per stall
Plat Subdivisions:
Preliminary Plat $300 + escrow (per chart)
Final Plat $50 + escrow (per chart)
Monticello Fee Schedule - 2015 4
Planned Unit Developments (PUDs):Concept:
Development:
Final:
Public ROW or Easement Vacation $200 + Escrow (per chart)
Rezoning Request:$200 + Escrow (per chart)
Simple Subdivision/Administrative Lot Combination/
Lot Line Adjustment $200 + Escrow (per chart)
Site Plan Review $50 + Escrow (per chart)
Special Home Occupation Permits:$200 + Escrow (per chart)
Special Planning Commission Meeting $350
Temporary Use Permit (waived for parades only)$50
Variance:
Single Family - Aplication Fee $200
- Deposit $500
All Other Applications - Application Fee $200
- Deposit $1,000
NOTE: When multiple land use applications are run concurrently, only one application fee and escrow deposit
shall be required per meeting cycle, until escrow is depleted. New escrow required per escrow chart once depleted.
ENGINEERING
Driveway Permit $25 $30
Grading Permit:
Existing Single-Family Residential $75 per permit + $1,500/acre restoration surety bond.
New Single-Family Residential Development,No drainage calculation review required:
Multi-Dwelling, Commercial & Industrial Properties $150 per permit plus restoration surety bond of $3000/first acre;
$1500 each additional acre.
Drainage calculation review required:
$350 per permit plus restoration surety bond of $3000/first acre;
$1500 each additional acre.
Land Reclamation/Mining Permit (requires Fee determined by City Council resolution + 100%
subdivision development agreement or CUP)of land restoration costs as determined by City Engineer
Public Improvement Security Letter of credit or cash based on statement of construction cost of
improvements x 125%
Right-of-Way Permits
Drops - no drawing required unless origination occurs more than 10 feet from property to be served:
Fee w/out drawings $25/25 addresses (maximum)$30
Fee with drawings $25/5 addresses with drawings (maximum)$30
Permit Extension Fee:$17.50 $20
Pavement Hole Fee:$50 $55
Trunk Line Fee:
Base Fee (first 100 feet)$40 $45
Trenching (over 100 feet)$.10/lineal foot
Boring (over 100 feet)$.05/lineal foot
Obstruction Fee:$40 $45
FIBERNET
Emergency Response:
Fiber cuts; customer-initiated emergency service $70/hour plus expenses (supplies, equipment rental, outside contractors, etc.)
*minimum of 30 minutes, charged in 30 minute increments
NOTE: Contact FiberNet Business Office or website for current rates for internet, phone and cable TV.
$50 + escrow (per chart)
$200 + escrow (per chart)
$200 + escrow (per chart)
Monticello Fee Schedule - 2015 5
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Controlled/Prescribed Burns:
Building $2,500
Prairie or Wildland, less than 20 acres $750/hour
Prairie or Wildland, 20 acres or more $1,000/hour
Emergency Response - Car Accident $500
FalseAlarm Policy* - First Time No charge
Second Time $250
Third Time or More $350
* Per calendar year
Fire Lock Box Fee:Cost + 10% + sales tax
Home Fire Safety Inspections (i.e. daycare/foster care)$50
LICENSES/PERMITS
Burning Permit:$250 deposit
(to cover expenses, if PW/Fire Dept are called to burn site)
Cigarette License:Tobacco licenses are issued by Wright County
Gambling License:Licensed through State of Minnesota; Requires Council approval
Liquor Administrative Fines:
First violation $500
Second violation, within 2 years $1,000
Third violation, within 2 years $2,000 (no mandatory revocation of license)
Liquor Licenses:
1-Day Consumption & Display $25
Temporary On-Sale (Beer)$10/day
Wine, On-Sale $275/per year
Wine/Strong Beer Comb. On-Sale $1,200/per year
Wine/3.2 Beer Com. On-Sale $500/per year
3.2 Beer, On-Sale $275/year
3.2 Beer, Off-Sale $100/per year
Liquor, On-Sale $3,750/per year
Liquor, Sunday Sales $200 (Statutory limit)
Liquor, Setups $250/year
Liquor,Club (Veteran's Org).
Membership
200 or less $300 (Statutory limit)
201-500 $500 (Statutory limit)
501-1000 $650 (Statutory limit)
1001-2000 $800 (Statutory limit)
2001-4000 $1,000 (Statutory limit)
Over 4000 $2,000 (Statutory limit)
Brew Pub Off-Sale $200/per year
Brewer Taproom $500/per year
Microdistillery $500/per year
(#625, 9/28/15)
Pawn Shop:
Annual license, initial $50
Annual renewal of current license $25
Transaction fee $1.00 per transaction
Peddler/Solicitor Permit:No charge - City resident/business (must register)
$10/person - Non-resident
Monticello Fee Schedule - 2015 6
Transient Merchant:
Annual permit, private premise $75/year
Daily Fees, operating under annual permit $10/day (with annual permit)
Daily fees, independent merchant $50/day
Daily fees, farm/garden fruits & vegetables No fee from 6/15 to 9/15 (state mandated)
Fireworks Sale $350/year
Traveling Shows $100/first day; $50/day for each day thereafter
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
Assessment/Property Search - full $25 $30
Property Bill Search - limited Free
Business List Free
Brochures:Free
City resident list: (Ex. Utility Billing List) $0.25/page + sales tax
City Labels $.50/sheet + sales tax
Comprehensive Guide Plan - Entire $32 plus tax
Downtown Revitalization Plan $15 plus tax
Transportation Plan $50 plus tax
Copies: copy machine $.25 per copy + sales tax
engineering copier $.50/square foot + sales tax ($2 minimum)
emailed $35.00/hour + sales tax (minimum 1/4 hour)
electronic media $10.00 + cost of media + sales tax
Delinquent Certification Processing Fee:$75 per parcel
Minimum Account Balance of $50
Processed once a year
Delinquent List $10 + tax (each)
Deposits on City Repair Projects $100-$300 (depending on est. value of work)
Maps: City map (24" X 36")$3 + sales tax
City map (11" X 17")$1 + sales tax
Zoning map (24" X 36")$3 + sales tax
State maps $.55 + sales tax
Wright County maps $3 + sales tax
Notary:$2 each $3
Signs: Current listed price + 10% handling charge + tax
City Ordinances:
Entire set of ordinances To obtain paper copies, contact City Hall.
Zoning Ordinance Charges based on prices listed under "Copies."
Subdivision Ordinance
City Code
Sanitary Sewer
Assessment Policy
City Maps
Meeting Agendas/Minutes
PARKS
Memorials:
Bench $1,500 (includes tax, delivery, installation)
Tree $300 (includes tax, delivery, installation)
Monticello Fee Schedule - 2015 7
Facility Rental Fees:
Baseball/Softball Field Rental* (no lights)
Residents $25 per field per day
Non-resident $35 per field per day
Field Lighting*
Residents $15 per hour per field
Non-resident $20 per hour per field
*these fees are for individuals/groups to use the city facility for practice or an informal game.
Tournament Field Rental (includes lights as needed)
- up to 3 days $90 per field
- extended days $10 per field for each additional day
Park Rental Rates:Resident Non-Resident
Ellison Gazebo $100 $125
Ellison Log Shelter $100 for 6 hrs $125 for 6 hrs
West Bridge Park Shelter/Warming House $100 for 6 hrs $125 for 6 hrs
West Bridge Picnic Shelter $100 for 6 hrs $125 for 6 hrs
Pioneer Park $100 for 6 hrs $125 for 6 hrs
Groveland Park Picnic Shelter $100 for 6 hrs $125 for 6 hrs
Otter Creek $50 for 6 hrs $75 for 6 hrs
East Bridge Wedding Gazebo $100 for 6 hrs $125 for 6 hrs
PUBLIC WORKS
Boulevard Disease Tree Removal If City is contracted for tree removal, the City will
pay 1/2 the cost of removal up to $225 per tree,
with resident responsible for the balance.
Boulevard Replacement Tree at 1/2 cost $30 maximum credit each
Chipping:$40 + tax per 1/2 hour or part thereof for the first 2 hours $50
$70 + tax per 1/2 hour or part thereof for the next hour $80
No more than 3 hours per year per property
Cone Replacement:Cost + $10 + sales tax
Construction Inspection (City or Engineer)$104/hour $105
Labor (no equipment):$50.00/hour - regular business hours $60
Rate will be increased if response required outside of regular hours
Rodding:$230/hour for one operator & machine
$115/hour or part thereof for 2 operators, machine and pickup
Sidewalk Snow & Ice Control $50.00 per lot - 1st Offence
$75.00 per lot - 2nd Offence
$100.00 per lot - maximum after 2nd Offence
$100.00 Mobilization Charge per Offence at Staff Discretion
Sweeping:$125/hour - includes operator
Utility Excavation Permit Fee (water, wastewater, stormwater)$75 $105
(Bonding and Insurance required)
Vac/Sewer Jet:$287.50/hour for one operator & machine
$345/hour for two operators & machine
Other Equipment (including operator):
Large Front End Loaders $150/hour
Mid Size Loaders $100/hour
Backhoe Loader $150/hour
Motor Grader $150/hour
Skid Steere $100/hour
Dump Truck $100/hour
Pickup or 1-ton Truck $60/hour
Monticello Fee Schedule - 2015 8
SANITARY SEWER
Sewer Rates: 1st 3740 gallons $21.69 minimum $22.69
Over 3740 gallons Over 3740 gallons $3.8900/748 gallons $3.97
Sewer Rates: Special Cases $26.93 X number of people in household $28.28
Industrial Sewer Rates: All Usage (effective July 1, 2016)$2.3300/748 gallons + sales tax $2.388
BOD5:$0.336/lb.+ sales tax $0.344
TSS:$0.462/lb.+ sales tax $0.474
Testing Actual costs + 10%
Sewer Discharge Environmental Fee (all sewer customers):2% of sewer bill
Sewer Connection Permit:$75 (residential or commercial)
Sewer and Water Combination Permit:$127 (residential)
$127 plus tax (commercial)
Sewer Access Charge:
Residential - Single Family $4,190/unit
All others per unit equivalent $4,190/unit
Trunk Sanitary Sewer:
Residential Unit $1,272/unit $1,323
Non-Residential $3,188/acre $3,316
Waste Water Discharge Permit:
10,000 to 15,000 GPD $50 annually
15,001 to 25,000 GPD $100 annually
25,001 to 50,000 GPD $150 annually
50,001 to 100,000 GPD $250 annually
over 100,000 GPD $300 annually
STORM SEWER
Trunk Storm Sewer Fees: $3,407 (net acre)$3,543
Alternate Ponding Area - Residential $3,490 per acre $3,630
Alternate Ponding Area - Commercial $6,997 per acre $7,277
Alternate Ponding Area - Industrial $8,176 per acre $8,503
WASTE ITEMS
Garbage Service Fees - Apts: w/o dumpsters
Pickup Disposal $30.00 x # units + 9.75% tax per quarter
Disposal Surcharge $9.00 x # units (non-taxable) per quarter
Garbage Service Fees - Commercial Residential & Non-Commercial Residential (and additional carts):
60 gallon: Pickup Disposal $24.00 x # units + 9.75% tax per quarter
Disposal Surcharge $6.00 x # units (non-taxable) per quarter
90 gallon: Pickup Disposal $30.00 x # units + 9.75% tax per quarter
Disposal Surcharge $9.00 x # units (non-taxable) per quarter
Cart Transfer Fee $30
Garbage Cart Replacement (if lost):
38 gallon $59.06 + 9.75% tax
60 gallon $65.31 + 9.75% tax
90 gallon $70.75 + 9.75% tax
Recycle Cart Replacement (if lost):
35 gallon $60
64 gallon $65
Storage Bins (red, yellow, blue)$10 includes sales tax (until sold out)
Monticello Fee Schedule - 2015 9
WATER
Hydrant Rates for Contractors:
(#1, #2 and #3 ARE ALL TAXABLE IF COMMERCIAL)
1. All contractors must obtain a permit from the Water Superintendent. The permit fee is $500.
This permit will define the hydrant to be used and provides a tally sheet for water usage.
2. The following rates shall apply:
Up to 500 cu. ft. or 3,750 gallons $30 minimum $35
500 cu. ft. or more $2.89/cubic ft
3,750 gallons or more $3.81/1,000 gallons
3. The following deposits shall be taken for use of City equipment (no exceptions):
Hydrant Wrench $50.00
2-1/2" fill hose $100.00
1-1/2" fill hose with 2-1/2" adapter $100.00
2-1/2" hydrant meter $1,000.00
3/4" and small meter $100.00
Nozzle $50.00
*If equipment is returned within 10 days of permit expiration in good condition, the full amount for water use
and equipment, less 10% per month on portion thereof for rent, shall be refunded.
Industrial Water Rate, Mtr 1
All usage $1.42/748 gallons + sales tax $1.45
Industrial Water Rate increases will be effective July 1st, 2015
Irrigation Water Rate - Resid, Twnhms & Comm:
first 3740 gallons $17.85 minimum + sales tax $18.85
3741-29,920 gallons $1.19/748 gallons + sales tax $1.22
29,921-100,000 gallons $1.38/748 gallons + sales tax $1.41
over 100,000 gallons $1.50/748 gallons + sales tax $1.53
(if metered separately, no quarterly minimum base rate is applied to irrigation meters with zero usage)
Final Bill Processing Fee $20
Res/Comm Water : 0-3740 gallons $17.85 minimum $18.85
3741-29,920 gallons $1.19/748 gallons $1.22
29,921-100,000 gallons $1.38/748 gallons $1.41
over 100,000 gallons $1.50/748 gallons $1.53
Minimum Bill for Malfunctioning Meter $150 after 4th contact attempt.
Trunk Water Charge:$943/residential unit $981
$2,358/acre non-residential $2,452
Water Access Charge: 1" line $833 + materials
1-1/4" line $1,266 + materials
1-1/2" line $1,518 + materials
2" line $1,997 + materials
3" line $2,498 + materials
4" line $3,291 + materials
6" line $4,143 + materials
8" line $5,440 + materials
Water Availability Charge:$40.25
(For those who have city water available but (billed in July)
choose not to hook up)
Water Connection Permit:$65 (residential)
$65 plus tax (commercial)
Water Main Tapping - New Services (1" only)$250 each + materials
Monticello Fee Schedule - 2015 10
Water Meters: 5/8" meter $355 + sales tax
3/4" meter $390 + sales tax
1" meter $490 + sales tax
1 1/2" meter $700 + sales tax $790
2" meter + up Cost + $50 + sales tax
1"x3/4" meter valves $55 + sales tax
1"x1" meter valves $60 + sales tax
Water Shut Off, then Turned On:$50.00 ($25 on/$25off) + delinquency (taxable if non-res.)
Water Violations (sprinkling):
1st Violation No Fee
2nd Violation $50
Each Subsequent Violation $100/per violation
Monticello Fee Schedule - 2015 11
SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. 628A
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A SUMMARY ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 2016 FEE SCHEDULE
TITLE 20 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on December 14, 2015, Ordinance No. 628 was
adopted by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. Due to the lengthy nature of
Ordinance No. 628, the following Summary Ordinance No. 628A has been prepared for
publication as authorized by state law.
The ordinance adopted by the Council establishes the 2016 Fee Schedule for the City of
Monticello, also known as Title 20 of the Monticello City Code. The general purpose of the
ordinance is to adopt fees for services provided by the City of Monticello with changes in the
following sections:
Animal Control
Cemetery
Community Center
Community Development – Building
Engineering
Miscellaneous Items
Public Works
Sanitary Sewer
Water
A printed copy of the whole ordinance is available for inspection by any person during
the City’s regular office hours. The complete ordinance will be posted on the City’s website
following publication.
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION by the City Council of the City of Monticello,
Minnesota, this 14th day of December, 2015.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Brian Stumpf, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeff O’Neill City Administrator
VOTING IN FAVOR:
VOTING IN OPPOSITION:
ABSENT:
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
1
4B.ConsiderationtoadoptResolution#2015-091approving2016Budget (WO)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
CityCouncilandstaffmetseveraltimestodiscusstheCity’sproposed2016budgetand
taxlevy.Asaresult,theCouncilapproveda2015preliminarylevyof$8,925,000,which
wascertifiedtoWrightCountyforthetaxnoticesthatweremailedinNovember.The
2016proposedlevyis$390,000(or4.6%)morethanthe2015adoptedlevy.
Forallbudgetedfunds,2016proposedexpendituresandotherusestotal$43,061,019and
2016proposedrevenuesandothersourcestotal$37,753,848.Thedifferencebetween
expendituresandotherusesandrevenuesandothersourcesiseitheranadditiontoor
subtractionfromfundreserves.
ProjectedBeginning ProjectedEnding
FundBalance/Estimated FundBalance/
WorkingCapital Revenues AppropriationsWorkingCapital
GeneralFund 4,406,058$7,596,000$7,596,000$4,406,058$
SpecialRevenueFunds
EconomicDevelopment 7,172,475 1,096,710 937,909 7,331,276
Cemetery 27,032 27,000 27,000 27,032
MinnesotaInvestment 1,129,689 25,000 -1,154,689
MonticelloCommunityCenter 440,828 1,779,326 1,779,326 440,828
TotalSpecialRevenueFunds 8,770,024 2,928,036 2,744,235 8,953,825
DebtServiceFunds
2007AG.O.ImprovementBond 463,296 516,082 619,600 359,778
2008AG.O.RevenueRefunding 5,871 --5,871
2008BG.O.SewerRefunding 1,376,366 845,000 1,049,254 1,172,112
2010AG.O.ImprovementBond 796,621 327,433 288,350 835,704
2011AG.O.RefundingBond 1,239,172 1,756,024 2,424,450 570,746
2014AG.O.JudgmentBonds 6,164 545,000 515,362 35,802
2015BG.O.Street/Improvement 662 273,000 212,468 61,194
TotalDebtServiceFunds 3,888,152 4,262,539 5,109,484 3,041,207
CapitalProjectFunds
CapitalProject 1,858,936 8,847,000 9,177,000 1,528,936
ClosedBondFund 732,764 105,720 -838,484
Park&PathwayDedication 493,333 2,000 468,000 27,333
StormwaterAccess 943,721 70,000 -1,013,721
StreetLightingImprovement 762,880 90,000 335,000 517,880
StreetConstruction 1,776,033 25,000 1,500,000 301,033
TotalCapitalProjectFunds 6,567,667 9,139,720 11,480,000 4,227,387
EnterpriseFunds
Water 4,311,102 1,331,500 2,790,808 2,851,794
Sewage 2,550,413 4,172,950 4,813,358 1,910,005
Liquor 971,617 5,372,710 5,238,666 1,105,661
DeputyRegistrar 405,086 401,100 371,416 434,770
FiberOptics 152,894 2,040,449 2,035,812 157,531
TotalEnterpriseFunds 8,391,112 13,318,709 15,250,060 6,459,761
InternalServiceFunds
ITServices (41,792)299,134 298,980 (41,638)
CentralEquipment 1,222,677 209,710 582,260 850,127
TotalInternalServiceFunds 1,180,885 508,844 881,240 808,489
TotalAllFunds 33,203,898$37,753,848$43,061,019$27,896,727$
FiscalYear2016
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
2
A1.BudgetImpact:Notedabove.Thepropertytaxlevyissetat$8,925,000for
thisbudget.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:Thebudgetshouldservestaffasaguidetoexpenditure
limitsfor2016,buthasnoworkloadimpact.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoadoptResolution2015-091approvingthe2016expenditurebudgetat
$43,061,019.
2.MotiontoadoptaResolutiontoapprovethe2016expenditurebudgetwith
modificationtofunds:Fund_____________for______________.
3.Motionnottoapprovethe2016expenditurebudgetandtocallforaspecial
meetingtoapprovethebudgetpriortoDecember31st.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendsAlternative#1,toadopttheresolutionapprovingthe2016
expenditurebudgetforallfundsat$43,061,019.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
•Resolution#2015-091
•Summarybudgetforeachfund
•GeneralFundSummary
•CapitalImprovementPlan
•FiberNetBudget(AsrecommendedbytheFiberNetAdvisoryBoardandStaff)
PowerPointpresentationtobehandedoutatthemeeting.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2015-091
ADOPTING THE 2016 BUDGET AND AUTHORIZING SPECIFIC
FINANCE-RELATED ACTIVITIES
WHEREAS, the budget is the fiscal blue print for the entire year where the City Council has
considered and incorporated all foreseeable spending plans for 2016; and
WHEREAS, the City, through sound fiscal policy, establishes that current revenues will be used
to finance current expenditures and regularly-occurring capital expenditures; and
WHEREAS, the City Council shall by this resolution set forth the total expenditures and uses,
excluding depreciation, and the total revenues and other sources for each budgeted fund.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello the
following is hereby approved:
SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF ESTIMATED REVENUES FROM ALL
SOURCES, APPROPRIATIONS, AND FUND BALANCE ADDED (EXPENDED):
Revenues Expenditures Fund Balance
Fund 2016 Budget 2016 Budget Added (Expended)
General Fund 7,596,000$ 7,596,000$ -$
Special Revenue Funds
Economic Development 1,096,710 937,909 158,801
Cemetery 27,000 27,000 -
Minnesota Investment 25,000 - 25,000
Monticello Community Center 1,779,326 1,779,326 -
Total Special Revenue Funds 2,928,036 2,744,235 183,801
Debt Service Funds
2007A G.O. Improvement Bond 516,082 619,600 (103,518)
2008A G.O. Sewer Refunding 845,000 1,049,254 (204,254)
2010A G.O. Improvement Bond 327,433 288,350 39,083
2011A G.O. Refunding Bond 1,756,024 2,424,450 (668,426)
2014A G.O. Judgment Bond 545,000 515,362 29,638
2015B G.O. Bonds 273,000 212,468 60,532
Total Debt Service Funds 4,262,539 5,109,484 (846,945)
Capital Project Funds
Capital Project 8,847,000 9,177,000 (330,000)
Closed Bond Fund 105,720 - 105,720
Park & Pathway Dedication 2,000 468,000 (466,000)
Stormwater Access 70,000 - 70,000
Street Lighting Improvement 90,000 335,000 (245,000)
Street Construction 25,000 1,500,000 (1,475,000)
Total Capital Project Funds 9,139,720 11,480,000 (2,340,280)
Enterprise Funds
Water 1,331,500 2,790,808 (1,459,308)
Sewage 4,172,950 4,813,358 (640,408)
Liquor 5,372,710 5,238,666 134,044
Deputy Registrar 401,100 371,416 29,684
Fiber Optics 2,040,449 2,035,812 4,637
Total Enterprise Funds 13,318,709 15,250,060 (1,931,351)
Internal Service Funds
IT Services 299,134 298,980 154
Central Equipment 209,710 582,260 (372,550)
Total Internal Service Funds 508,844 881,240 (372,396)
Total All Funds 37,753,848$ 43,061,019$ (5,307,171)$
SECTION 2. TRANSFERS:
By resolution, the Council can amend or rescind this section as the year progresses. The
following list does not include any transfers for projects that have not received formal council
authorization.
a. To 2011A GO Improvement Bond Fund from Water Fund - $500,000 and EDA/TIF -
$200,000 (Total - $700,000).
b. To 2008A GO Sewer Revenue Refunding Bond Fund from Sewage Fund - $340,000.
c. To 2010A GO Improvement Bond Fund from Sewage Fund - $85,134 and Water Fund
$150,000 (Total - $235,134).
d. To Capital Projects Fund - $1,500,000 Street Reconstruction and $1,000,000 Water Fund
(Total $2,500,000).
e. To FiberNet Fund from Liquor Fund - $350,000.
SECTION 3. CAPITAL EQUIPMENT AND IMPROVEMENT ACQUISITION:
a. Approves substitution of Streets tractor and accessories ($102,000), Parks one-ton truck
($34,000), and Parks one-ton truck with accessories ($65,000) for plow truck listed in
equipment portion of the 2014A G.O. Bonds.
b. No equipment or construction project acquisition is specifically approved by this section.
SECTION 5. OTHER BUDGET AUTHORIZING ACTIONS:
a. Removes prior commitments and assignments, except those required by GASB, from
fund balance classifications.
b. Approves Senior Center annual subsidy of $56,760.
c. Approves a 2% wage adjustment to full-time, part-time (excluding MCC staff and
volunteer fire personnel) and seasonal employees for the pay period commencing on
January 9, 2016 and an additional 1% commencing on July 9, 2016.
d. Approves the paid-on-call fire and rescue personnel hourly rate change from $10 per hour
to $12 per hour commencing on January 1, 2016.
e. Approves increasing the hourly pay range to $7.75 - $9.73 for pay grades 4-7 on the
MCC minor pay scale.
f. Establishes the monthly standard health insurance benefits at $1,085 with an effective
date of March 1. Premium contributions are required from family/dependent plan
participants for the difference between the standard benefit and coverage costs. No
contribution is required from single-plan and non-plan participants.
ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 14th day of December, 2015.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
_____________________________
Brian Stumpf, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Jeff O’Neill, City Administrator
Draft-BUDGETSUMMARY(12-09)
GENERALFUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
PropertyTaxes 5,669,969$5,580,437$5,507,285$5,882,000$5,882,000$6,177,000$5.0%
TaxIncrements ---------
Franchise&OtherTaxes 237,022 241,664 237,173 236,500 236,500 283,900 20.0%
Licenses&Permits 275,198 331,136 378,809 321,180 396,180 338,900 5.5%
IntergovernmentalRevenues 304,395 373,482 321,891 299,677 299,677 301,177 0.5%
ChargesforServices 310,307 280,288 318,278 267,261 267,261 267,664 0.2%
Fines&Forfeits 63,106 41,124 48,744 42,100 42,100 42,100 0.0%
SpecialAssessments 10,349 22,351 22,808 300 300 300 0.0%
Miscellaneous 491,770 117,863 330,858 196,982 196,982 184,959 -6.1%
OperatingTransfers 1,729 --------
TOTALREVENUES 7,363,845$6,988,345$7,165,846$7,246,000$7,321,000$7,596,000$4.8%
EXPENDITURES
PersonnelServices 2,710,939$2,589,353$2,555,898$2,734,757$2,734,757$2,979,264$8.9%
Supplies 482,080 520,328 534,655 580,800 580,800 662,900 14.1%
OtherServices&Charges 3,366,417 3,291,073 3,256,898 3,570,773 3,570,773 3,710,936 3.9%
CapitalOutlay -59,535 108,900 195,600 195,600 242,900 24.2%
OperatingTransfers 2,326,995 92,000 293,000 164,070 164,070 --100.0%
TOTALEXPENDITURES 8,886,431$6,552,289$6,749,351$7,246,000$7,246,000$7,596,000$4.8%
FUNDBALANCE-JANUARY1 5,001,093$3,478,507$3,914,563$4,331,058$4,331,058$4,406,058$
Excess(Deficiency)of
RevenuesoverExpenditures (1,522,586)436,056 416,495 -75,000 -
FUNDBALANCE-DECEMBER31 3,478,507$3,914,563$4,331,058$4,331,058$4,406,058$4,406,058$
SPECIALREVENUEFUNDS
EDAFUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
PropertyTaxes -$-$-$-$-$280,000$---
TaxIncrements 1,052,110 992,339 838,000 726,215 755,915 677,244 -6.7%
Licenses&Permits ---------
IntergovernmentalRevenues ---------
ChargesforServices ---------
Fines&Forfeits ---------
SpecialAssessments ---------
Miscellaneous 293,157 113,821 329,583 225,360 225,360 139,466 -38.1%
OperatingTransfers -92,000 93,000 94,900 94,900 --100.0%
TOTALREVENUES 1,345,267$1,198,160$1,260,583$1,046,475$1,076,175$1,096,710$4.8%
EXPENDITURES
PersonnelServices 13,906$3,116$5,932$12,804$12,804$94,869$640.9%
Supplies 1,170 -36 ------
OtherServices&Charges 214,618 114,190 752,594 120,624 120,624 409,120 239.2%
CapitalOutlay 433,406 707,552 487,306 349,786 349,786 233,920 -33.1%
OperatingTransfers 699,264 779,804 218,353 271,900 271,900 200,000 -26.4%
TOTALEXPENDITURES 1,362,364$1,604,662$1,464,221$755,114$755,114$937,909$24.2%
FUNDBALANCE-JANUARY1 7,478,651$7,461,554$7,055,052$6,851,414$6,851,414$7,172,475$
Excess(Deficiency)of
RevenuesoverExpenditures (17,097)(406,502)(203,638)291,361 321,061 158,801
FUNDBALANCE-DECEMBER31 7,461,554$7,055,052$6,851,414$7,142,775$7,172,475$7,331,276$
Summary All Funds - 1
RIVERSIDECEMETERY 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
PropertyTaxes -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Licenses&Permits ---------
IntergovernmentalRevenues ---------
ChargesforServices 19,810 12,913 37,465 24,800 24,800 26,000 4.8%
Fines&Forfeits ---------
SpecialAssessments ---------
Miscellaneous 963 (314)1,258 808 808 1,000 23.8%
ContributedCapital ---------
OperatingTransfers ---------
DebtProceeds ---------
TOTALREVENUES 20,773$12,599$38,723$25,608$25,608$27,000$5.4%
EXPENDITURES
PersonnelServices 6,602$2,197$3,089$4,073$4,073$4,073$0.0%
Supplies 245 401 96 775 775 775 0.0%
OtherServices&Charges 15,849 13,645 19,200 25,775 25,775 22,152 -14.1%
CapitalOutlay ---------
OperatingTransfers ---------
TOTALEXPENDITURES 22,696$16,243$22,385$30,623$30,623$27,000$-11.8%
FUNDBALANCE-JANUARY1 21,276$19,353$15,709$32,047$32,047$27,032$
Excess(Deficiency)of
RevenuesoverExpenditures (1,923)(3,644)16,338 (5,015)(5,015)-
FUNDBALANCE-DECEMBER31 19,353$15,709$32,047$27,032$27,032$27,032$
MINNINVESTMENTFUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
PropertyTaxes -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Licenses&Permits ---------
IntergovernmentalRevenues ---------
ChargesforServices ---------
Fines&Forfeits ---------
SpecialAssessments ---------
Miscellaneous 43,588 (14,840)53,471 25,000 25,000 25,000 0.0%
OperatingTransfers ---------
TOTALREVENUES 43,588$(14,840)$53,471$25,000$25,000$25,000$0.0%
EXPENDITURES
PersonnelServices -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Supplies ---------
OtherServices&Charges ---------
CapitalOutlay ---------
OperatingTransfers ---------
TOTALEXPENDITURES -$-$-$-$-$-$---
FUNDBALANCE-JANUARY1 1,022,470$1,066,058$1,051,218$1,104,689$1,104,689$1,129,689$
Excess(Deficiency)of
RevenuesoverExpenditures 43,588 (14,840)53,471 25,000 25,000 25,000
FUNDBALANCE-DECEMBER31 1,066,058$1,051,218$1,104,689$1,129,689$1,129,689$1,154,689$
Summary All Funds - 2
COMMUNITYCENTER 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
PropertyTaxes 1,197,239$1,181,335$1,388,404$1,363,000$1,363,000$364,000$-73.3%
Licenses&Permits ---------
IntergovernmentalRevenues ---------
ChargesforServices 1,106,158 1,279,363 1,312,825 1,391,300 1,391,300 1,387,110 -0.3%
Fines&Forfeits ---------
SpecialAssessments ---------
Miscellaneous 58,969 24,701 14,534 53,750 53,750 28,216 -47.5%
OperatingTransfers 850,000 175,000 50,000 ------
TOTALREVENUES 3,212,366$2,660,399$2,765,763$2,808,050$2,808,050$1,779,326$-36.6%
EXPENDITURES
PersonnelServices 923,264$969,868$963,780$1,002,065$1,002,065$1,060,173$5.8%
Supplies 173,306 278,327 182,906 261,396 261,396 201,600 -22.9%
OtherServices&Charges 361,638 368,035 409,453 460,589 460,589 447,553 -2.8%
CapitalOutlay 1,662,666 77,465 -79,000 79,000 70,000 -11.4%
OperatingTransfers 890,000 875,000 1,040,000 1,005,000 1,005,000 --100.0%
TOTALEXPENDITURES 4,010,874$2,568,695$2,596,139$2,808,050$2,808,050$1,779,326$-36.6%
FUNDBALANCE-JANUARY1 978,008$179,500$271,204$440,828$440,828$440,828$
Excess(Deficiency)of
RevenuesoverExpenditures (798,508)91,704 169,624 ---
FUNDBALANCE-DECEMBER31 179,500$271,204$440,828$440,828$440,828$440,828$
DEBTSERVICEFUND
2014AGOJUDGMENTBONDS 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
PropertyTaxes -$-$-$-$-$544,000$---
Licenses&Permits ---------
IntergovernmentalRevenues ---------
ChargesforServices ---------
Fines&Forfeits ---------
SpecialAssessments ---------
Miscellaneous --778 1,000 1,000 1,000 0.0%
OperatingTransfers ---------
DebtProceeds --168,374 ------
TOTALREVENUES -$-$169,152$1,000$1,000$545,000$54400.0%
EXPENDITURES
PersonnelServices -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Supplies ---------
OtherServices&Charges ---------
CapitalOutlay ---------
DebtService ---185,000 163,988 515,362 178.6%
OperatingTransfers ---------
TOTALEXPENDITURES -$-$-$185,000$163,988$515,362$178.6%
FUNDBALANCE-JANUARY1 #REF!#REF!#REF!#REF!#REF!#REF!
Excess(Deficiency)of
RevenuesoverExpenditures --169,152 (184,000)(162,988)29,638
FUNDBALANCE-DECEMBER31 #REF!#REF!#REF!#REF!#REF!#REF!
Summary All Funds - 3
2010AGOIMPROVEMENTBOND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
PropertyTaxes 51,704$20,152$-$40,000$40,000$40,000$0.0%
Licenses&Permits ---------
IntergovernmentalRevenues ---------
ChargesforServices ---------
Fines&Forfeits ---------
SpecialAssessments 192,715 118,480 61,310 55,073 113,900 52,299 -5.0%
Miscellaneous 20,101 (8,639)26,613 ------
OperatingTransfers 308,195 308,195 239,595 117,936 417,936 235,134 99.4%
DebtProceeds ---------
TOTALREVENUES 572,715$438,188$327,518$213,009$513,009$327,433$53.7%
EXPENDITURES
PersonnelServices -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Supplies ---------
OtherServices&Charges ---------
CapitalOutlay ---------
DebtService 460,428 448,550 360,767 302,899 302,899 288,350 -4.8%
OperatingTransfers ---------
TOTALEXPENDITURES 460,428$448,550$360,767$302,899$302,899$288,350$-4.8%
FUNDBALANCE-JANUARY1 517,835$630,122$619,760$586,511$586,511$796,621$
Excess(Deficiency)of
RevenuesoverExpenditures 112,287 (10,362)(33,249)(89,890)210,110 39,083
FUNDBALANCE-DECEMBER31 630,122$619,760$586,511$496,621$796,621$835,704$
2008G.O.SEWERREFUNDING 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
PropertyTaxes 517,039$502,889$499,697$500,000$500,000$500,000$0.0%
Licenses&Permits ---------
IntergovernmentalRevenues ---------
ChargesforServices ---------
Fines&Forfeits ---------
SpecialAssessments ---------
Miscellaneous 19,319 (12,429)21,686 5,000 5,000 5,000 0.0%
OperatingTransfers 450,000 450,000 857,337 340,000 1,040,000 340,000 0.0%
DebtProceeds ---------
TOTALREVENUES 986,358$940,460$1,378,720$845,000$1,545,000$845,000$0.0%
EXPENDITURES
PersonnelServices -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Supplies ---------
OtherServices&Charges ---------
CapitalOutlay ---------
DebtService 1,048,486 1,050,216 1,049,360 1,048,942 1,048,942 1,049,254 0.0%
OperatingTransfers ---------
TOTALEXPENDITURES 1,048,486$1,050,216$1,049,360$1,048,942$1,048,942$1,049,254$0.0%
FUNDBALANCE-JANUARY1 722,832$660,704$550,948$880,308$880,308$1,376,366$
Excess(Deficiency)of
RevenuesoverExpenditures (62,128)(109,756)329,360 (203,942)496,058 (204,254)
FUNDBALANCE-DECEMBER31 660,704$550,948$880,308$676,366$1,376,366$1,172,112$
Summary All Funds - 4
2011AG.O.BONDFUND(2005A)2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
PropertyTaxes 260,490$246,424$222,865$330,000$330,000$330,000$0.0%
Licenses&Permits ---------
IntergovernmentalRevenues ---------
ChargesforServices ---------
Fines&Forfeits ---------
SpecialAssessments 692,899 753,058 1,049,370 598,038 598,038 517,124 -13.5%
Miscellaneous 196,438 224,246 251,357 216,800 216,800 208,900 -3.6%
OperatingTransfers 1,959,131 2,658,286 1,769,953 946,900 825,000 700,000 -26.1%
DebtProceeds ---------
TOTALREVENUES 3,108,958$3,882,014$3,293,545$2,091,738$1,969,838$1,756,024$-16.0%
EXPENDITURES
PersonnelServices -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Supplies ---------
OtherServices&Charges ---------
CapitalOutlay ---------
DebtService 3,053,238 2,911,356 2,880,767 2,460,750 2,460,750 2,424,450 -1.5%
OperatingTransfers ---------
TOTALEXPENDITURES 3,053,238$2,911,356$2,880,767$2,460,750$2,460,750$2,424,450$-1.5%
FUNDBALANCE-JANUARY1 290,928$346,648$1,317,306$1,730,084$1,730,084$1,239,172$
Excess(Deficiency)of
RevenuesoverExpenditures 55,720 970,658 412,778 (369,012)(490,912)(668,426)
FUNDBALANCE-DECEMBER31 346,648$1,317,306$1,730,084$1,361,072$1,239,172$570,746$
2015BG.O.Bonds 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
PropertyTaxes -$-$-$-$-$250,000$---
Licenses&Permits ---------
IntergovernmentalRevenues ---------
ChargesforServices ---------
Fines&Forfeits ---------
SpecialAssessments -----22,000 ---
Miscellaneous -----1,000 ---
OperatingTransfers ---------
DebtProceeds ---662 662 --100.0%
TOTALREVENUES -$-$-$662$662$273,000$41138.7%
EXPENDITURES
PersonnelServices -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Supplies ---------
OtherServices&Charges ---------
CapitalOutlay ---------
DebtService -----212,468 ---
OperatingTransfers ---------
TOTALEXPENDITURES -$-$-$-$-$212,468$---
FUNDBALANCE-JANUARY1 -$-$-$-$-$662$
Excess(Deficiency)of
RevenuesoverExpenditures ---662 662 60,532
FUNDBALANCE-DECEMBER31 -$-$-$662$662$61,194$
Summary All Funds - 5
2007AIMPROVEMENTBOND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
PropertyTaxes 431,051$427,447$539,672$420,000$420,000$420,000$0.0%
Licenses&Permits ---------
IntergovernmentalRevenues ---------
ChargesforServices ---------
Fines&Forfeits ---------
SpecialAssessments 162,335 144,881 378,594 116,114 116,114 96,082 -17.3%
Miscellaneous (9,666)(2,872)(4,309)------
OperatingTransfers 140,000 --------
DebtProceeds ---------
TOTALREVENUES 723,720$569,456$913,957$536,114$536,114$516,082$-3.7%
EXPENDITURES
PersonnelServices -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Supplies ---------
OtherServices&Charges -375 167 ------
CapitalOutlay ---------
DebtService 623,670 625,115 625,710 621,800 621,800 619,600 -0.4%
OperatingTransfers ---------
TOTALEXPENDITURES 623,670$625,490$625,877$621,800$621,800$619,600$-0.4%
FUNDBALANCE-JANUARY1 216,886$316,936$260,902$548,982$548,982$463,296$
Excess(Deficiency)of
RevenuesoverExpenditures 100,050 (56,034)288,080 (85,686)(85,686)(103,518)
FUNDBALANCE-DECEMBER31 316,936$260,902$548,982$463,296$463,296$359,778$
2008AREVENUEREFUNDING 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
PropertyTaxes -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Licenses&Permits ---------
IntergovernmentalRevenues ---------
ChargesforServices ---------
Fines&Forfeits ---------
SpecialAssessments ---------
Miscellaneous 1,987 (1,330)561 500 500 --100.0%
OperatingTransfers 890,000 875,000 1,040,000 1,005,000 1,005,000 --100.0%
DebtProceeds ---------
TOTALREVENUES 891,987$873,670$1,040,561$1,005,500$1,005,500$-$-100.0%
EXPENDITURES
PersonnelServices -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Supplies ---------
OtherServices&Charges -375 167 ------
CapitalOutlay ---------
DebtService 1,100,880 1,074,120 1,037,360 1,001,260 1,001,260 --100.0%
OperatingTransfers ---------
TOTALEXPENDITURES 1,100,880$1,074,495$1,037,527$1,001,260$1,001,260$-$-100.0%
FUNDBALANCE-JANUARY1 408,315$199,422$(1,403)$1,631$1,631$5,871$
Excess(Deficiency)of
RevenuesoverExpenditures (208,893)(200,825)3,034 4,240 4,240 -
FUNDBALANCE-DECEMBER31 199,422$(1,403)$1,631$5,871$5,871$5,871$
Summary All Funds - 6
CAPITALPROJECTSFUNDS
CAPITALPROJECTFUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
PropertyTaxes -$-$228,854$-$-$-$---
Licenses&Permits ---------
IntergovernmentalRevenues 238,580 892,150 41,962 2,901,000 600,000 1,347,000 -53.6%
ChargesforServices ---------
Fines&Forfeits ---------
SpecialAssessments --159,038 ------
Miscellaneous 24,286 (5,701)21,523 ------
OperatingTransfers 3,148,680 460,401 200,000 1,569,170 69,170 2,500,000 59.3%
DebtProceeds ----2,600,000 5,000,000 ---
TOTALREVENUES 3,411,546$1,346,850$705,310$4,470,170$3,269,170$8,847,000$97.9%
EXPENDITURES
PersonnelServices -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Supplies --9,497 ------
OtherServices&Charges 333 23,737 16,615 ------
CapitalOutlay 1,253,139 1,714,983 893,015 4,821,000 1,500,000 9,177,000 90.4%
OperatingTransfers -100,000 -------
TOTALEXPENDITURES 1,253,472$1,838,720$919,127$4,821,000$1,500,000$9,177,000$90.4%
FUNDBALANCE-JANUARY1 (1,362,621)$795,453$303,583$89,766$89,766$1,858,936$
Excess(Deficiency)of
RevenuesoverExpenditures 2,158,074 (491,870)(213,817)(350,830)1,769,170 (330,000)
FUNDBALANCE-DECEMBER31 795,453$303,583$89,766$(261,064)$1,858,936$1,528,936$
CLOSEDBONDFUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
PropertyTaxes -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Licenses&Permits ---------
IntergovernmentalRevenues ---------
ChargesforServices ---------
Fines&Forfeits ---------
SpecialAssessments 844,574 1,027,174 241,810 209,000 209,000 100,720 -51.8%
Miscellaneous 33,242 (19,501)67,631 5,000 5,000 5,000 0.0%
OperatingTransfers 299,339 --------
DebtProceeds ---------
TOTALREVENUES 1,177,155$1,007,673$309,441$214,000$214,000$105,720$-50.6%
EXPENDITURES
PersonnelServices -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Supplies ---------
OtherServices&Charges ---------
CapitalOutlay ---------
DebtService ---------
OperatingTransfers 575,122 750,000 664,500 -500,000 ----
TOTALEXPENDITURES 575,122$750,000$664,500$-$500,000$-$---
FUNDBALANCE-JANUARY1 514,117$1,116,150$1,373,823$1,018,764$1,018,764$732,764$
Excess(Deficiency)of
RevenuesoverExpenditures 602,033 257,673 (355,059)214,000 (286,000)105,720
FUNDBALANCE-DECEMBER31 1,116,150$1,373,823$1,018,764$1,232,764$732,764$838,484$
Summary All Funds - 7
PARK&PATHWAYDEDICATION 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
PropertyTaxes -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Licenses&Permits ---------
IntergovernmentalRevenues --369,713 ------
ChargesforServices ---70,000 70,000 --100.0%
Fines&Forfeits ---------
SpecialAssessments ---------
Miscellaneous 10,937 (7,851)32,870 2,000 2,000 2,000 0.0%
OperatingTransfers 573,833 750,000 664,500 -500,000 ----
TOTALREVENUES 584,770$742,149$1,067,083$72,000$572,000$2,000$-97.2%
EXPENDITURES
PersonnelServices -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Supplies --8,765 ------
OtherServices&Charges 126 6,000 38,539 90,000 90,000 --100.0%
CapitalOutlay -205,470 1,254,879 727,000 727,000 468,000 -35.6%
OperatingTransfers ---------
TOTALEXPENDITURES 126$211,470$1,302,183$817,000$817,000$468,000$-42.7%
FUNDBALANCE-JANUARY1 (141,890)$442,754$973,433$738,333$738,333$493,333$
Excess(Deficiency)of
RevenuesoverExpenditures 584,644 530,679 (235,100)(745,000)(245,000)(466,000)
FUNDBALANCE-DECEMBER31 442,754$973,433$738,333$(6,667)$493,333$27,333$
STORMWATERACCESSFUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
PropertyTaxes -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Licenses&Permits ---------
IntergovernmentalRevenues ---------
ChargesforServices --38,494 50,000 50,000 50,000 0.0%
Fines&Forfeits ---------
SpecialAssessments ---------
Miscellaneous 62,037 (17,598)39,638 20,000 20,000 20,000 0.0%
OperatingTransfers ---------
DebtProceeds ---------
TOTALREVENUES 62,037$(17,598)$78,132$70,000$70,000$70,000$0.0%
EXPENDITURES
PersonnelServices -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Supplies ---------
OtherServices&Charges 604 7,164 292 ------
CapitalOutlay ---------
OperatingTransfers 396,073 321,800 326,300 ------
TOTALEXPENDITURES 396,677$328,964$326,592$-$-$-$---
FUNDBALANCE-JANUARY1 1,803,383$1,468,743$1,122,181$873,721$873,721$943,721$
Excess(Deficiency)of
RevenuesoverExpenditures (334,640)(346,562)(248,460)70,000 70,000 70,000
FUNDBALANCE-DECEMBER31 1,468,743$1,122,181$873,721$943,721$943,721$1,013,721$
Summary All Funds - 8
STREETLIGHTIMPROVEMENTS 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
PropertyTaxes -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Franchise&OtherTaxes 110,912 86,003 43,620 80,000 80,000 80,000 0.0%
Licenses&Permits ---------
IntergovernmentalRevenues ---------
ChargesforServices ---------
Fines&Forfeits ---------
SpecialAssessments ---------
Miscellaneous 40,427 (10,106)86,976 10,000 10,000 10,000 0.0%
OperatingTransfers ---------
DebtProceeds ---------
TOTALREVENUES 151,339$75,897$130,596$90,000$90,000$90,000$0.0%
EXPENDITURES
PersonnelServices -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Supplies ---------
OtherServices&Charges 570 --------
CapitalOutlay ---125,000 250,000 335,000 168.0%
OperatingTransfers 400,000 --------
TOTALEXPENDITURES 400,570$-$-$125,000$250,000$335,000$168.0%
FUNDBALANCE-JANUARY1 965,618$716,387$792,284$922,880$922,880$762,880$
Excess(Deficiency)of
RevenuesoverExpenditures (249,231)75,897 130,596 (35,000)(160,000)(245,000)
FUNDBALANCE-DECEMBER31 716,387$792,284$922,880$887,880$762,880$517,880$
STREETRECONSTRUCTIONFUND
STREETRECONSTRUCTION 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
PropertyTaxes 29,655$2,346$176$-$-$-$---
Licenses&Permits ---------
IntergovernmentalRevenues ---------
ChargesforServices ---------
Fines&Forfeits ---------
SpecialAssessments ---------
Miscellaneous 133,869 (24,620)84,752 25,000 25,000 25,000 0.0%
OperatingTransfers 275,000 --------
DebtProceeds ---------
TOTALREVENUES 438,524$(22,274)$84,928$25,000$25,000$25,000$0.0%
EXPENDITURES
PersonnelServices -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Supplies ---------
OtherServices&Charges 37 --------
CapitalOutlay ---------
OperatingTransfers 1,862,005 219,000 -1,500,000 -1,500,000 0.0%
TOTALEXPENDITURES 1,862,042$219,000$-$1,500,000$-$1,500,000$0.0%
FUNDBALANCE-JANUARY1 3,330,897$1,907,379$1,666,105$1,751,033$1,751,033$1,776,033$
Excess(Deficiency)of
RevenuesoverExpenditures (1,423,518)(241,274)84,928 (1,475,000)25,000 (1,475,000)
FUNDBALANCE-DECEMBER31 1,907,379$1,666,105$1,751,033$276,033$1,776,033$301,033$
Summary All Funds - 9
WATERFUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
PropertyTaxes -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Licenses&Permits 970 1,920 2,735 3,700 3,700 3,700 0.0%
IntergovernmentalRevenues ---------
ChargesforServices 1,146,604 1,170,787 1,042,343 1,146,800 1,146,800 1,146,800 0.0%
Fines&Forfeits ---------
SpecialAssessments 158,319 44,339 40,440 30,000 30,000 30,000 0.0%
Miscellaneous 194,675 (36,171)230,817 71,000 71,000 71,000 0.0%
ContributedCapital --81,362 80,000 257,000 80,000 0.0%
OperatingTransfers ---------
DebtProceeds ---------
TOTALREVENUES 1,500,568$1,180,875$1,397,697$1,331,500$1,508,500$1,331,500$0.0%
1,398,427 730
EXPENDITURES
PersonnelServices 217,412$212,410$188,151$281,134$281,134$304,153$8.2%
Supplies 122,659 82,194 160,665 166,150 166,150 167,350 0.7%
OtherServices&Charges 251,695 195,257 221,750 285,263 288,263 311,305 9.1%
CapitalOutlay 3,375 318,708 11,656 355,000 355,000 358,000 0.8%
DebtService
OperatingTransfers 207,219 413,500 631,560 558,264 858,264 1,650,000 195.6%
TOTALEXPENDITURES 802,360$1,222,069$1,213,782$1,645,811$1,948,811$2,790,808$69.6%
FUNDBALANCE-JANUARY1 3,910,484$4,608,692$4,567,498$4,751,413$4,751,413$4,311,102$
Excess(Deficiency)of
RevenuesoverExpenditures 698,208 (41,194)183,915 (314,311)(440,311)(1,459,308)
FUNDBALANCE-DECEMBER31 4,608,692$4,567,498$4,751,413$4,437,102$4,311,102$2,851,794$
-
SEWAGEFUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
Propertytaxes -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Licenses&Permits ---------
IntergovernmentalRevenues ---------
ChargesforServices 1,853,141 1,981,967 2,047,789 2,050,500 2,050,500 2,050,500 0.0%
Fines&Forfeits ---------
SpecialAssessments ---------
Miscellaneous 135,999 (23,047)195,867 62,000 62,000 62,000 0.0%
ContributedCapital --885,132 60,450 763,565 60,450 0.0%
OperatingTransfers ---------
DebtProceeds 1,436 3,003,224 -3,322,000 1,400,000 2,000,000 -39.8%
TOTALREVENUES 1,990,576$4,962,144$3,128,788$5,494,950$4,276,065$4,172,950$-24.1%
EXPENDITURES
PersonnelServices 283,869$263,020$242,621$281,945$281,945$307,175$8.9%
Supplies 21,774 16,057 22,132 28,950 28,950 24,650 -14.9%
OtherServices&Charges 1,049,425 997,338 1,305,025 1,269,290 1,168,290 1,231,201 -3.0%
CapitalOutlay 79,019 2,935,299 127,857 3,677,000 1,605,000 2,333,000 -36.6%
DebtService 109,981 172,259 364,963 359,698 359,698 492,198 36.8%
OperatingTransfers --1,690,672 574,672 1,424,672 425,134 -26.0%
TOTALEXPENDITURES 1,544,068$4,383,973$3,753,270$6,191,555$4,868,555$4,813,358$-22.3%
FUNDBALANCE-JANUARY1 2,742,706$3,189,214$3,767,385$3,142,903$3,142,903$2,550,413$
Excess(Deficiency)of
RevenuesoverExpenditures 446,508 578,171 (624,482)(696,605)(592,490)(640,408)
FUNDBALANCE-DECEMBER31 3,189,214$3,767,385$3,142,903$2,446,298$2,550,413$1,910,005$
Summary All Funds - 10
LIQUORFUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
SaleofGoods 4,854,798$5,085,925$5,165,737$4,973,000$5,213,833$5,367,710$7.9%
Licenses&Permits ---------
IntergovernmentalRevenues ---------
ChargesforServices ---------
Fines&Forfeits ---------
SpecialAssessments ---------
Miscellaneous (9,161)(7,596)13,709 5,000 5,000 5,000 0.0%
ContributedCapital ---------
OperatingTransfers ---------
DebtProceeds ---------
TOTALREVENUES 4,845,637$5,078,329$5,179,446$4,978,000$5,218,833$5,372,710$7.9%
EXPENDITURES
PersonnelServices 422,579$441,640$455,647$509,082$509,082$532,654$4.6%
Supplies 3,627,138 3,759,667 3,865,883 3,739,390 3,779,390 4,045,798 8.2%
OtherServices&Charges 200,897 209,149 202,811 231,387 231,387 235,214 1.7%
CapitalOutlay 16,234 --125,000 -75,000 -40.0%
DebtService
OperatingTransfers 3,500,000 650,000 600,000 450,000 450,000 350,000 -22.2%
TOTALEXPENDITURES 7,766,848$5,060,456$5,124,341$5,054,859$4,969,859$5,238,666$3.6%
FUNDBALANCE-JANUARY1 3,570,876$649,665$667,538$722,643$722,643$971,617$
Excess(Deficiency)of
RevenuesoverExpenditures (2,921,211)17,873 55,105 (76,859)248,974 134,044$
FUNDBALANCE-DECEMBER31 649,665$667,538$722,643$645,784$971,617$1,105,661$
DEPUTYREGISTRAR 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
PropertyTaxes -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Licenses&Permits ---------
IntergovernmentalRevenues ---------
ChargesforServices 455,293 456,285 497,709 400,050 400,050 400,100 0.0%
Fines&Forfeits ---------
SpecialAssessments ---------
Miscellaneous 12,105 (2,089)10,825 1,000 1,000 1,000 0.0%
OperatingTransfers ---------
TOTALREVENUES 467,398$454,196$508,534$401,050$401,050$401,100$0.0%
EXPENDITURES
PersonnelServices 264,045$269,045$254,363$287,851$287,851$313,561$8.9%
Supplies 4,900 8,601 10,572 15,050 15,050 16,250 8.0%
OtherServices&Charges 13,313 23,861 34,587 40,528 40,528 41,605 2.7%
CapitalOutlay ---------
OperatingTransfers 325,000 75,000 50,000 ------
TOTALEXPENDITURES 607,258$376,507$349,522$343,429$343,429$371,416$8.1%
FUNDBALANCE-JANUARY1 250,624$110,764$188,453$347,465$347,465$405,086$
Excess(Deficiency)of
RevenuesoverExpenditures (139,860)77,689 159,012 57,621 57,621 29,684
FUNDBALANCE-DECEMBER31 110,764$188,453$347,465$405,086$405,086$434,770$
Summary All Funds - 11
FIBEROPTICS 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
PropertyTaxes -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Licenses&Permits ---------
IntergovernmentalRevenues ---------
ChargesforServices 1,765,457 1,595,490 1,635,943 1,639,184 1,639,184 1,643,670 0.3%
Fines&Forfeits ---------
SpecialAssessments ---------
Miscellaneous 202,375 668,094 122,710 12,400 12,400 46,779 277.3%
ContributedCapital ---------
OperatingTransfers 4,450,000 860,000 6,383,732 450,000 450,000 350,000 -22.2%
DebtProceeds 1,003,262 --------
TOTALREVENUES 7,421,094$3,123,584$8,142,385$2,101,584$2,101,584$2,040,449$-2.9%
EXPENDITURES
PersonnelServices 639,646$445,423$480,585$484,466$494,466$640,185$32.1%
Supplies 105,496 166,060 145,304 246,660 246,660 131,488 -46.7%
OtherServices&Charges 2,189,008 1,790,009 1,742,265 1,249,530 1,249,530 1,264,139 1.2%
CapitalOutlay -226,667 -120,000 120,000 --100.0%
DebtService 938,053 642,620 5,689,322 ------
OperatingTransfers ---------
TOTALEXPENDITURES 3,872,203$3,270,779$8,057,476$2,100,656$2,110,656$2,035,812$-3.1%
FUNDBALANCE-JANUARY1 (3,324,639)$224,252$77,057$161,966$161,966$152,894$
Excess(Deficiency)of
RevenuesoverExpenditures 3,548,891 (147,195)84,909 928 (9,072)4,637
FUNDBALANCE-DECEMBER31 224,252$77,057$161,966$162,894$152,894$157,531$
INTERNALSERVICEFUNDS
ITSERVICES 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
PropertyTaxes -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Licenses&Permits ---------
IntergovernmentalRevenues ---------
ChargesforServices -125,000 125,000 278,101 278,101 299,034 7.5%
Fines&Forfeits ---------
SpecialAssessments ---------
Miscellaneous -(136)(136)100 100 100 0.0%
OperatingTransfers -30,000 30,000 ------
DebtProceeds ---------
TOTALREVENUES -$154,864$154,864$278,201$278,201$299,134$7.5%
EXPENDITURES
PersonnelServices -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Supplies -7,473 22,803 35,600 35,600 32,200 -9.6%
OtherServices&Charges -108,416 195,916 232,500 232,500 256,780 10.4%
CapitalOutlay -17,013 -10,000 10,000 10,000 0.0%
DebtService ---------
OperatingTransfers ---------
TOTALEXPENDITURES -$132,902$218,719$278,100$278,100$298,980$7.5%
FUNDBALANCE-JANUARY1 -$-$21,962$(41,893)$(41,893)$(41,792)$
Excess(Deficiency)of
RevenuesoverExpenditures -21,962 (63,855)101 101 154
FUNDBALANCE-DECEMBER31 -$21,962$(41,893)$(41,792)$(41,792)$(41,638)$
Summary All Funds - 12
CENTRALEQUIPMENTFUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
PropertyTaxes -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Licenses&Permits ---------
IntergovernmentalRevenues ---------
ChargesforServices -62,535 62,535 153,600 153,600 204,600 33.2%
Fines&Forfeits ---------
SpecialAssessments ---------
Miscellaneous -(5,726)(5,726)5,110 5,110 5,110 0.0%
OperatingTransfers -500,663 500,663 ------
DebtProceeds -500,000 500,000 ------
TOTALREVENUES -$1,057,472$1,057,472$158,710$158,710$209,710$32.1%
EXPENDITURES
PersonnelServices -$-$-$-$-$-$---
Supplies ---------
OtherServices&Charges -4,567 -------
CapitalOutlay -95,000 589,853 289,500 224,500 451,000 55.8%
DebtService -59,297 -77,760 77,760 131,260 68.8%
OperatingTransfers ---------
TOTALEXPENDITURES -$158,864$589,853$367,260$302,260$582,260$58.5%
FUNDBALANCE-JANUARY1 -$-$898,608$1,366,227$1,366,227$1,222,677$
Excess(Deficiency)of
RevenuesoverExpenditures -898,608 467,619 (208,550)(143,550)(372,550)
FUNDBALANCE-DECEMBER31 -$898,608$1,366,227$1,157,677$1,222,677$850,127$
Summary All Funds - 13
2016BudgetDraft-12-09
GENERALFUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE
PropertyTaxes $5,669,969 $5,580,437 $5,507,285 $5,882,000 $5,882,000 $6,177,000 5.0%
Franchise&OtherTaxes 237,022 241,664 237,173 236,500 236,500 283,900 20.0%
Licenses&Permits 275,198 331,136 378,809 321,180 396,180 338,900 5.5%
IntergovernmentalRevenues 304,395 373,482 321,891 299,677 299,677 301,177 0.5%
ChargesforServices 310,307 280,288 318,278 267,261 267,261 267,664 0.2%
Fines&Forfiets 63,106 41,124 48,744 42,100 42,100 42,100 0.0%
SpecialAssessments 10,349 22,351 22,808 300 300 300 0.0%
Miscellaneous 491,770 117,863 330,858 196,982 196,982 184,959 -6.1%
OperatingTransfers 1,729 --------
TOTALREVENUES 7,363,845$6,988,345$7,165,846$7,246,000$7,321,000$7,596,000$4.8%
EXPENDITURESBYDEPARTMENT
GENERALGOVERNMENT
MayorandCouncil 51,988$53,696$52,182$53,925$53,925$53,925$0.0%
CityAdministration 228,738 260,322 273,992 305,153 305,153 320,099 4.9%
Elections 38,933 2,425 41,835 3,093 3,093 42,864 1285.8%
Finance 337,348 326,510 385,662 405,558 405,558 428,980 5.8%
Audit 39,227 47,823 53,541 43,000 43,000 45,000 4.7%
CityAssessing 49,600 49,664 49,832 52,115 52,115 52,115 0.0%
Legal 40,275 46,905 29,303 37,000 37,000 37,000 0.0%
HumanResources 84,041 93,067 90,565 116,631 116,631 118,688 1.8%
Planning&Zoning 163,629 182,753 220,080 203,320 203,320 218,023 7.2%
InformationTechnologyServices 130,102 95,572 33,759 46,829 46,829 11,540 -75.4%
CityHall 233,602 215,507 193,186 200,749 200,749 207,223 3.2%
PrairieCenterBuilding 15,095 15,355 14,409 19,080 19,080 14,120 -26.0%
TOTALGENERALGOVERNMENT 1,412,578$1,389,599$1,438,346$1,486,453$1,486,453$1,549,577$4.2%
PUBLICSAFETY
LawEnforcement 1,187,382$1,190,441$1,145,247$1,175,815$1,175,815$1,222,627$4.0%
Fire&Rescue 207,778 222,141 306,779 266,011 266,011 333,823 25.5%
FireRelief 74,221 109,594 108,186 80,000 80,000 80,000 0.0%
BuildingInspections 248,376 251,007 266,545 304,452 304,452 369,663 21.4%
CivilDefense 2,719 9,707 1,661 3,856 3,856 3,930 1.9%
AnimalControl 49,594 47,426 49,439 50,724 50,724 51,348 1.2%
NationalGuard 14,287 14,517 14,061 17,050 17,050 16,050 -5.9%
TOTALPUBLICSAFETY 1,784,357$1,844,833$1,891,918$1,897,908$1,897,908$2,077,441$9.5%
PUBLICWORKS
PublicWorksAdministration 176,457$113,882$122,151$123,580$123,580$194,771$57.6%
Engineering 200,287 224,028 195,841 169,508 169,508 160,058 -5.6%
PublicWorksInspecitons 64,827 54,878 36,867 96,952 96,952 88,809 -8.4%
Streets&Alleys 655,170 689,046 735,629 876,407 876,407 968,559 10.5%
Ice&Snow 133,193 210,552 308,387 250,684 250,684 284,280 13.4%
Shop&Garage 219,646 186,741 177,644 194,810 194,810 204,101 4.8%
Stormwater 51,468 12,064 16,842 73,168 73,168 73,121 -0.1%
ParkingLots 4,568 2,965 3,814 9,403 9,403 8,403 -10.6%
StreetLighting 196,779 206,005 195,695 229,500 229,500 263,900 15.0%
RefuseCollection 500,037 505,996 517,955 588,291 588,291 614,437 4.4%
TOTALPUBLICWORKS 2,202,432$2,206,157$2,310,825$2,612,303$2,612,303$2,860,439$9.5%
RECREATIONANDCULTURE
CommunityCelebrations 5,165$1,186$688$3,300$3,300$2,500$-24.2%
SeniorCenter 88,441 90,219 97,547 99,922 99,922 101,672 1.8%
Transit --10,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 0.0%
IceArena 75,000 75,000 -------
ParkOperations 533,537 572,985 570,639 803,325 803,325 824,997 2.7%
ParkImprovements ---------
ParkBallfields 29,419 25,517 18,149 32,800 32,800 27,300 -16.8%
ShadeTree 52,983 53,475 68,891 58,628 58,628 63,527 8.4%
General Fund Summary - 1
GENERALFUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 %
Library 29,715 35,395 36,764 39,962 39,962 40,526 1.4%
TOTALRECREATIONANDCULTURE 814,260$853,777$802,678$1,077,937$1,077,937$1,100,522$2.1%
UNALLOCATED
EconomicDevelopment 45,585 0 -------
Insurance 233,717 127,710 12,584 7,329 7,329 8,021 9.4%
TOTALUNALLOCATED 279,302$127,710$12,584$7,329$7,329$8,021$9.4%
---
OTHERUSES ---
OperatingTranfers 2,393,502$130,213$293,000$164,070$164,070$-$-100.0%
TOTALOTHERUSES 2,393,502$130,213$293,000$164,070$164,070$-$-100.0%
TOTALEXPENDITURES 8,886,431$6,552,289$6,749,351$7,246,000$7,246,000$7,596,000$4.8%
FUNDBALANCE-JANUARY1 5,001,093$3,478,507$3,914,563$4,331,058$4,331,058$4,406,058$
Excess(Deficiency)of
RevenuesoverExpenditures (1,522,586)436,056 416,495 -75,000 -
FUNDBALANCE-DECEMBER31 3,478,507$3,914,563$4,331,058$4,331,058$4,406,058$4,406,058$
General Fund Summary - 2
CapitalImprovementPlan2016-2025
Department/Asset Ref.2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total
PublicWorks
PublicWorksFacility PWK-13-001 12,000,000 12,000,000
PWFacilityLandAcquisition PWK-13-002 200,000 200,000
Generator STE-13-011 7,000 7,000
One-TonTruck VEQ-13-013 65,000 65,000
Truck-Pickup4X4 VEQ-13-014 30,000 35,000 65,000
BucketTruck VEQ-13-015 130,000 130,000
BlacktopPaver VEQ-13-016 75,000 75,000
BlacktopPlaner VEQ-13-017 22,000 22,000
Router VEQ-13-018 22,000 22,000
ConcreteSaw VEQ-13-019 20,000 20,000
Backhoe VEQ-13-021 95,000 95,000
PlowTruck VEQ-13-022 225,000 255,000 480,000
One-TonTruckandPlow VEQ-13-023 65,000 65,000
SnowGoSnowBlower VEQ-13-025 142,000 142,000
SkidSteereLoader VEQ-13-026 65,000 65,000
SignLabSystem VEQ-13-027 35,000 35,000
PaverTrailer VEQ-13-028 20,000 20,000
WheelLoader-3yd.VEQ-14-001 220,000 225,000 445,000
StreetSweeper VEQ-14-002 200,000 200,000
BlacktopHotBox VEQ-14-003 80,000 80,000
StreetBanners MNC-15-005 16,000 16,000
StopLightPainting MNC-15-004 30,000 30,000 30,000 90,000
SnowPlowSkidSteere VEQ-16-12,000 12,000
RoadGrader VEQ-16-200,000 200,000
ElectronicSignReader VEQ-16-10,000 10,000
MedianSizeLoader VEQ-16-60,000 60,000
HotRubberMelterCrackSealer VEQ-16-50,000 50,000
MiniTankTackTrailer VEQ-16-15,000 15,000
-
Subtotal-PublicWorks 342,000 610,000 772,000 12,387,000 575,000 -----14,686,000
Recreation&Culture
ParkShopAddition20x36 MNC-15-003 -
HuntersCrossingParkDevelopment PAR-13-001 -
FeatherstoneParkDevelopment PAR-13-002 60,000 60,000
SunsetPondsShelter PAR-13-003 10,000 10,000
PioneerPark-BandShell PAR-13-004 90,000 90,000
PlaygroundEquip(Parwest-2015/Pioneer2017)PAR-13-005 15,000 21,500 36,500
MontiHillParkDevelopment PAR-13-006 17,500 17,500
PathwayImprovemnents(reclassify)MNC-13-007 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 400,000
BertramLakesLandAcquisition PAR-13-008 208,000 208,000
BCOLImprovements PAR-13-010 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 50,000
DugoutRoofs-XcelBallFields PAR-13-011 -
BCOLBallFields PAR-13-012 200,000 2,000,000 2,200,000
EllisonParkLogShelter PAR-13-013 250,000 250,000
CSAH75PathwayLighting(W&EBridge)PAR-13-014 60,000 60,000
SodCutter STE-13-012 3,000 3,000
ParkMowers VEQ-13-031 35,000 35,000
Trucks VEQ-13-032 65,000 65,000 80,000 210,000
MTTracklessSidewalkMachine VEQ-13-033 140,000 140,000
CushmanTruckster VEQ-13-037 25,000 25,000
CIP - 1
CapitalImprovementPlan2016-2025
Department/Asset Ref.2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total
JDTractor VEQ-13-038 35,000 35,000
SkidLoader VEQ-13-039 65,000 40,000 105,000
DogParkMeadowOaksPark PAR-15-001 15,000 15,000
SpirtHillsPathwayConnection PAR-15-003 45,000 45,000
FenningAvenuePathwayConnection PAR-15-004 200,000 200,000
ToroInfieldPro5040 VEQ-13-041 25,000 25,000
UtilityMule-ReplaceKawaski#202 VEQ-13-001 15,000 15,000
WestBridgeSplashPad/EastBridgeBandShell 800,000 800,000
EllisonParkMemorialproject PAR-16-001 12,000 12,000
WBweenotespackage(MusicalInstruments)STE-16-003 6,300 6,300
BoardingdockforEllison MNC-16-003 8,200 8,200
OtterCreekGazebo MNC-16-002 6,500 6,500
BallfieldFencing MNC-16-001 2,000 2,000
Tablesandbenches STE-16-001 4,000 4,000
-
Subtotal-Recreation 737,500 706,500 2,395,000 885,000 125,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 5,074,000
Fire&Rescue
FireStationAddition FRD-13-001 250,000 250,000
NewFireStation FRD-13-002 3,000,000 3,000,000
SCBAPacks STE-13-006 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 50,000
FireLadderTruck VEQ-13-006 1,100,000 1,100,000
Generator MNC-16-005 15,000 15,000
TurnoutGear STE-16-005 15,000 15,000
Subtotal-Fire&Rescue 35,000 5,000 5,000 4,355,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 4,430,000
DeputyRegistrar
SecurityCameras STE-13-018 -
DMVVehicle VEQ-13-047 20,000 20,000
-
Subtotal-DeputyRegistrar 20,000 ---------20,000
LiquorStore
ParkingLotImprovements LIQ-13-002 75,000 75,000
LiquorStore LIQ-13-003 -1,500,000 1,500,000
LiquorStoreCoolers VEQ-13-046 25,000 25,000 50,000
-
Subtotal-LiquorStore 100,000 --1,525,000 ------1,625,000
ITServices
PersonalComputers STE-13-001 10,800 15,600 15,600 15,600 15,600 15,600 15,600 15,600 15,600 15,600 151,200
LedgerSizeColorScanner STE-13-002 4,000 -4,000
Multi-ServerComponentUpgrade STE-13-003 4,000 -4,000
Laptops STE-13-005 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 30,000
GISHardwareandSoftware STE-13-007 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 80,000
PavementManagementSoftware STE-13-008 3,000 3,200 3,400 3,600 3,800 4,000 4,200 4,400 4,600 4,600 38,800
-
Subtotal-ITServices 32,800 29,800 30,000 30,200 30,400 30,600 30,800 31,000 31,200 31,200 308,000
CIP - 2
CapitalImprovementPlan2016-2025
Department/Asset Ref.2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total
Streets
CityStreetSigns MNC-13-001 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 400,000
AnnualChipSeal MNC-14-001 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,750,000
SchoolBlvd/CedarStreetSignal 50,000 450,000
ParkingLotReconstruction STR-13-002 90,000 90,000
OverlayRuralOutlyingStreets STR-13-004 500,000 500,000
E7thStreet/Hwy25Intersection 1,350,000 150,000
FallonAvenueOverpass STR-13-006 1,200,000 4,320,000 480,000 6,000,000
StreetReconstruction-Area5 3,000,000 300,000
StreetReconstruction-Area6 STR-13-008 50,000 940,000 110,000 1,100,000
StreetReconstruction-Area7B STR-13-009 50,000 1,060,000 125,000 1,235,000
StreetLightImprovements STR-13-010 75,000 125,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 800,000
TH25/CSAH75IntersectionImprovements STR-13-014 1,347,000 100,000 1,447,000
95thStreetExtension 1,350,000 150,000
FlashingYellowArrow-SignalImprovements 200,000 150,000
ElmStreetSidewalkand3rdStpedblinker STR-15-003 150,000 150,000
SidewalkGapImprovementProject(TBD)STR-15-004 100,000 100,000
-
Subtotal-Streets 8,787,000 7,390,000 2,390,000 415,000 290,000 290,000 290,000 290,000 290,000 290,000 13,572,000
Stormwater/Drainage -
StormwaterPondRestoration SWD-13-001 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 400,000
StormwaterLiftstation(TH25Pond)SWD-13-002 1,000,000 1,000,000
StormWaterPondLining SWD-13-003 100,000 100,000 200,000
BoulevardDrainageTile SWD-13-004 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 500,000
-
Subtotal-Stormwater/Drainage 90,000 190,000 1,190,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 2,100,000
Utility-Sewage
AnnualSewageTrunkImprovements UTS-13-001 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 1,500,000
CoreStreetSewageImprovements 1,080,000 120,000
Liftstation-MarvinRoad UTS-13-002 275,600 275,600
WWTPPhosphorusReductionImprovements UTS-13-003 1,200,000 1,200,000
WWTPSolidsHandlingImprovements UTS-13-004 1,365,000 1,365,000
WWTPPhase2Improvements UTS-13-005 5,100,000 5,100,000
SewerJetter VEQ-13-001 400,000 400,000
SCADASystem-Sewage VEQ-13-004 700,000 700,000
Truck-RegularCab4X4 VEQ-13-002 33,000 33,000
DigesterCovers UTS-15-001 800,000 800,000
PublicWorksCartegraph VEQ-15-005 25,000 25,000
WWTPRepairandMaintenance UTS-16-125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 1,250,000
-
Subtotal-Sewage 3,413,000 1,095,000 1,640,000 5,775,000 550,600 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 12,648,600
Utility-Water
AnnualWaterSystemImprovements UTW-13-001 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 1,500,000
CoreStreetWaterImprovements 1,000,000
WaterTreatmentFacility UTW-13-002 4,500,000 4,500,000
Well#6 UTW-13-003 1,200,000 1,200,000
Watermain-90thStreettoChelsea UTW-13-004 126,000 126,000
BoosterStationUpgrade UTW-13-005 130,000 130,000
Truck-RegularCab4X4 VEQ-13-002 33,000 33,000
CIP - 3
CapitalImprovementPlan2016-2025
Department/Asset Ref.2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total
SCADASystem-Water VEQ-13-003 -
MeterMXUs UTW-15-001 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 325,000
PublicWorksCartegraph VEQ-15-005 25,000 25,000
-
Subtotal-Water 1,399,000 345,000 215,000 5,915,000 215,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 7,839,000
MonticelloCommunityCenter
MovableWalls MCC-13-001 25,000 25,000
SplashPark MCC-13-002 1,000,000 1,000,000
NewRoofs MCC-13-005 100,000 100,000 200,000
ParkingLotImprovements MCC-13-006 65,000 65,000
Carpet MNC-13-006 45,000 45,000
WoodFloor-MississippiRoom MNC-13-007 12,000 12,000
VanityandPartitionReplacement MNC-13-010 10,000 10,000 20,000
DiamondBritePool/SpaResurface MNC-13-013 50,000 50,000
MechanicalImprovements MNC-13-014 14,000 133,000 20,000 167,000
RecreationEquipment STE-13-013 7,500 7,500 36,000 10,000 7,500 68,500
TableCovers STE-13-014 4,000 4,000
Tables STE-13-015 5,000 5,000 10,000
PatioFurniture STE-13-016 4,000 4,000
Dishwasher VEQ-13-045 15,000 15,000
PoolToy VEQ-13-060 100,000 120,000 220,000
SecurityCameraUpdate STE-15-001 12,000 12,000
RompnStompAddition MCC-14-001 50,000 50,000
WalkTrack MNC-16-001 30,000
FriendshipIsl,toPrairieCenter -
Subtotal-MCC 111,500 1,306,500 426,000 134,000 7,500 12,000 ----1,967,500
GrandTotal 15,067,800 11,677,800 9,063,000 31,511,200 1,888,500 897,600 885,800 886,000 886,200 886,200 64,270,100
SummarybyFunction
CommunityCenter 111,500 1,306,500 426,000 134,000 7,500 12,000 ----1,967,500
DeputyRegistrar 20,000 ---------20,000
Fire&Rescue 35,000 5,000 5,000 4,355,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 4,430,000
ITServices 32,800 29,800 30,000 30,200 30,400 30,600 30,800 31,000 31,200 31,200 308,000
LiquorStore 100,000 --1,525,000 ------1,625,000
PublicWorks 342,000 610,000 772,000 12,387,000 575,000 -----14,686,000
Recreation 737,500 706,500 2,395,000 885,000 125,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 5,074,000
Stormwater 90,000 190,000 1,190,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 2,100,000
Streets 8,787,000 7,390,000 2,390,000 415,000 290,000 290,000 290,000 290,000 290,000 290,000 13,572,000
Utility-Sewage 3,413,000 1,095,000 1,640,000 5,775,000 550,600 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 12,648,600
Utility-Water 1,399,000 345,000 215,000 5,915,000 215,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 7,839,000
SummaryTotal 15,067,800 11,677,800 9,063,000 31,511,200 1,888,500 897,600 885,800 886,000 886,200 886,200 64,270,100
CIP - 4
FiberNet
2016Budget-Draft
12/9/2015
AccountNumber Description 2015
Amended
2015
Estimate
2016Draft
Budget
REVENUE
656-00000-341180 PEGAccessFee $(10,000)(7,559)(7,435)
656-00000-341190 USFFee (10,000)(8,153)(8,083)
656-00000-362920 Services-Misc -(16,596)(15,776)
656-00000-362990 OtherMiscellaneousRevenue -(1,811)(2,001)
656-00000-380510 TelevisionServices (565,284)(583,621)(619,082)
656-00000-380520 InternetServices (554,256)(607,569)(659,011)
656-00000-380522 EquipmentRental/Purchase (127,044)(139,170)(128,502)
656-00000-380530 PhoneServices (315,000)(283,842)(267,617)
656-00000-380540 CABSRevenue (12,000)(12,559)(6,000)
656-00000-380542 LateFees -(16,225)(16,260)
656-00000-380545 DiscountsOffered-Taxable -26,353 26,213
656-00000-380546 DiscountsOffered-NonTaxable -43,485 42,107
656-00000-380557 MiscellaneousCharges (12,400)(21,834)(27,520)
656-00000-380558 MiscCharges-NonTaxable -(2,177)(1,483)
OPERATINGREVENUETotals:(1,605,984)(1,631,277)(1,690,449)
EXPENSE
Dept49870 General&Administration
656-49870-410100 SalariesFull-TimeReg 89,749 111,415 184,238
656-49870-410200 SalariesFull-TimeOT 4,500 241 600
656-49870-410300 SalariesPart-TimeReg 30,101 20,646 18,000
656-49870-410310 SalariesPart-Time.OT 500 --
656-49870-410400 SalariesTemporary-Reg 5,000 425 -
656-49870-412100 PeraContributions 9,364 10,660 15,213
656-49870-412200 FicaContributions 8,051 8,522 12,576
656-49870-412300 MedicareContributions 1,883 1,993 2,941
656-49870-413100 HealthInsuranceContributions 47,508 40,293 56,421
656-49870-413300 LifeInsuranceContributions -245 300
656-49870-413400 DisabilityInsContributions -390 600
656-49870-415100 WorkersComp --644
656-49870-421990 GenOperatingSupplies 14,500 337 17,088
656-49870-430100 ProfessionalServices-Audit 5,350 784 -
656-49870-430400 LegalFees -18,981 9,600
656-49870-430700 ManagementServices(GM)75,000 26,831 -
656-49870-431800 ProfessionalServices-Billings 25,000 12,540 26,400
656-49870-431970 RegulatoryProfessionalSvcs 20,000 24,363 9,600
656-49870-431970 CSR-SupportServices -7,396 12,000
656-49870-431990 MiscellaneousProfServices 24,000 52,080 12,000
656-49870-432100 Telephone/Internet 2,640 1,875 1,800
656-49870-432150 InternalITServices 24,291 24,291 26,929
656-49870-432200 Mail&DeliveryServices -8,393 8,400
656-49870-432500 Cable/NetworkServices -6,048 8,600
656-49870-433200 Training/Conferences -395 1,200
656-49870-434600 Marketing 1,500 1,420 1,800
656-49870-436100 LPVInsurance 9,514 10,549 9,165
656-49870-440100 RepairandMaint-Buildings -2,859 2,400
656-49870-441200 Building/RoomRental 16,980 16,980 16,980
656-49870-443200 WriteOffs 11,000 20,725 21,600
656-49870-443300 DuesMembershipandSubscrip 1,500 1,295 1,300
656-49870-443700 LicensesAndPermits 1,500 1,762 1,625
656-49870-443980 BankCharges 15,000 12,228 12,000
656-49870-443990 MiscellaneousOtherExp 6,000 13,298 6,000
656-49870-472030 OperatingTransferOut ---
656-49870EXPENSETotalS:450,431 460,259 498,020
AccountNumber Description 2015
Amended
2015
Estimate
2016Draft
Budget
Dept49877 FieldOperations
656-49877-410100 SalariesFull-TimeReg 190,118 220,221 226,313
656-49877-410200 SalariesFull-TimeOT 10,000 11,530 12,000
656-49877-410300 SalariesPart-TimeReg ---
656-49877-410310 SalariesPart-TimeOT ---
656-49877-410400 SalariesTemporary-Reg ---
656-49877-412100 PeraContributions 13,884 16,781 17,873
65649877-412200 FicaContributions 12,097 13,457 14,775
65649877-412300 MedicareContributions 2,829 3,146 3,456
656-49877-413100 HealthInsuranceContributions 45,882 59,605 66,539
656-49877-413300 LifeInsuranceContributions -358 600
656-49877-413400 DisabilityInsContributions -630 1,200
656-49877-414200 UCBenefitPayments ---
656-49877-415100 WorkCompInsPremiums 13,000 8,253 5,896
656-49877-421110 ClothingSupplies 5,000 1,658 1,800
656-49877-421200 MotorFuels 10,000 2,605 3,600
656-49877-421800 Fiber/Video/PhoneSupplies 145,000 53,302 73,000
656-49877-421990 GenOperatingSupplies 35,000 33,325 30,000
656-49877-422500 LandscapingMaterials 5,000 36 -
656-49877-422990 MiscRepairandMaintSupplies 2,160 123 -
656-49877-424100 SmallTools($500-$9999)25,000 -6,000
656-49877-431900 Maintenance/SupportServices 110,000 80,184 108,000
656-49877-431990 MiscellaneousProfServices 15,000 8,129 12,000
656-49877-432770 GopherStateLocates 5,000 1,453 1,800
656-49877-433100 TravelExpense 2,000 -
656-49877-433200 Training/Conferences 5,000 -
656-49877-438100 Electric 27,500 22,808 24,000
656-49877-438200 Water/Sewer 2,000 533 900
656-49877-438400 Refuse/RecyclingServices 500 1,347 1,200
656-49877-440100 RepairandMaint-Buildings/Systems 10,000 10,725 24,000
656-49877-440440 Repair&Maint-Mach&Equip 5,000 1,137 4,000
656-49877-440500 RepairandMaint-Vehicles 5,000 575 4,000
656-49877-443990 MiscellaneousOtherExp 6,255 28,800 6,000
656-49877-458010 OtherEquipment 120,000 --
656-49877-472030 OperatingTransferOut ---
656-49877EXPENSETotals:828,225 580,722 648,952
Dept49879 CostofGoodsSold
656-49879-430910 Voice-TechnicalServices 76,000 67,768 $68,280
656-49879-430920 Video-TechnicalServices 576,000 624,148 661,260
656-49879-430930 Data-TechnicalServices 170,000 201,874 159,300
656-49879-443720 Video-LicensesandPermits -134 -
656-49879EXPENSETotals:822,000 893,924 888,840
OPERATINGEXPENSETotals:2,100,656 1,934,904 2,035,812
OPERATING(LOSS)(494,672)(303,627)(345,362)
OPERATING-averagemonthly(loss)(41,223)(25,302)(28,780)
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
1
4C.ConsiderationofadoptingResolution#2015-092acceptingtheFeasibilityReportfor
the2016StreetReconstructionProjectandauthorizepreparationofplansand
specifications/authorizetheadvertisementofbidsforthe7th StreetRetainingWall,
CityProjectNo.15C001 (SB)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
TheCityCouncilauthorizedpreparationofaFeasibilityReportaddressingthenextphaseofthe
City’sstreetreconstructionprojectasidentifiedintheCity’sOverallStreetReconstructionthat
beganin2003.Theproposedstreetstobereconstructedhadbeenidentifiedas“Area5”inthe
OverallStreetReconstructionPlanandhavebeenidentifiedintheCity’sCapitalImprovement
Planforreconstructionin2016.
Area5
Thestreetsproposedtobereconstructedtotalapproximately14,050feetinlengthandinclude:
3rd and4th StreetEastfromTH25toWashingtonStreet
6th StreetEastfromTH25toCedarStreet
CedarandRamseyStreetfrom7th StreetEasttoEastBroadwayStreet
WashingtonStreetfromtherailroadtrackstoEastBroadwayStreet
WrightStreetfrom7th StreetEasttotherailroadtracks,aswellas
Palm,New,Wright,andHennepinStreetsbetween4th StreetEastandEastBroadway
Street
Improvementstothe4th StreetParkparkinglotwasalsoconsidered.
Thisreportalsoinvestigatesimprovementsto7th StreetfromCedarStreettoWashingtonStreet
andCedarStreetsouthof7th StreetEast,whichareproposedtobedelayedtothetimewhenthe
FallonAvenueoverpassprojectisconstructed.
TheutilityimprovementswithinArea5includethefollowing:
Replaceorlineallofthesanitarysewermains
Replaceallofthesanitarysewerservicesfromthemainlinetothepropertyline
Replacethemajorityofthesanitarysewercastings
Replacewatermainvalvesandhydrants
Replacestormsewerpipeandstructuresandcastingswhereneeded
Installnewstormsewerpipeandstructureswhereneededtoimprovedrainageconditions
Extend12to16-inchwatermaintofeedfuturewatertreatmentplant
PumphousepipingimprovementsforWell#1and#2
SidewalkandTrailConnections
Staffevaluatedconnectingthesidewalkandtrailgapsthatarecurrentlypresentwithinthe
projectareathatwouldbenefitboththeresidentsandbusinesseswithintheprojectarea.These
connectionsalsoprovidecontinuitytotheoverallsidewalkandtrailcorridorswithinthecore
areaoftheCitythatthenextendtoregionalsystemconnections.TheCity’sadoptedParkandTrail
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
2
planincludesapolicystatementsupportingincreasedconnectivityinthepathwayandsidewalk
system
CedarStreetSidewalk:TheCityCouncilshouldconsiderconstructionofanew6-foot-
wideconcretesidewalkalongthewestsideofCedarStreetbetween4th Streetand7th
Streettoaccommodatepedestrianfacilitiesonbothsideoftheroadwaytofunnelusersto
theintersectionat4th StreetandTH25,whereatrafficsignalisplannedforthefutureper
theCity’stransportationplan.Constructionofsidewalk/trailfacilitiesalongrelatively
highertrafficroadwaysandcollectorroadwaysshouldbeconsideredinordertolimit
pedestrianandbicyclecrossingsandimprovesafety.
WashingtonStreetTrail:A10-widebituminoustrailisbeingproposedalongthewest
sideofWashingtonStreetasthisroadwaywillhaveanincreaseintrafficvolumewiththe
FallonAvenueoverpassandwillprovideaconnectiontotheexistingtrailalong7th Street
withthefutureroundaboutat7th StreetandWashingtonStreet
Otherpedestrianandbicycleimprovementsthatareevaluatedinthereportinclude:
ReplacementofsidewalkalongthesouthsideofEastBroadwayStreetbetween
CedarStreetandWashingtonStreet
BituminoustrailalongthesouthsideoftherailroadcorridorbetweenTH25and
WashingtonStreet
TH25/7th StreetIntersection
Improvementstotheintersectionincludethefollowing:
7th StreetEast:
Reconstructbituminouspavementtomatchexisting44-footwidthbetweenTH25and
CedarStreet.
Constructarightturnlanealongwestbound7th StreetbetweenTH25andCedarStreet.
InstallmodularblockretainingwallbetweentheproposedrightturnlaneandtheHillside
cemeteryfence.
Constructaretainingwallandinstalllandscapingatthenorthwestcornerof7th Streetand
CedarStreetadjacenttoHillsidecemetery
Install6-footwideconcretesidewalkonthesouthsideof7th StreetfromTH25toCedar
Street.
SignalimprovementsincludingflashingyellowarrowsattheTH25approacheswith
centerleftturnlanestripingbetweenTH25andCedarStreet
TH25:
Constructnorthboundandsouthboundrightturnlanesat7th Street.
Signalimprovementsincludingflashingyellowarrowsatthe7th Streetapproaches
CompletestreetscapeimprovementsalongtheTH25corridorbetween7th Streetand6th
Street.
ConstructCityentrancemonument/plazaatthenortheastcornerofTH25and7th Street.
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
3
Install6-foot-wideconcretesidewalkandboulevardtreatmentsonthewestsidefrom7th
Streetto6th Street.
Install8-foot-wideconcretesidewalkandboulevardtreatmentsontheeastsidefrom7th
Streetto6th Street.
Installmodularblockretainingwallnorthontheeastsidenorthandsouthof7th Street.
Streetscapeimprovementsareproposedtoestablishagatewayintothecity.These
improvementsutilizespecificlandscapeelements,plantmaterialsandwayfinding.PublicWorks
staffwereengagedisseveraldiscussionsrelatedtothestreetscapeimprovementsandtheyare
supportiveofthedesign.Theplantingsproposedforthiscorridorarehardyandsalttolerant
materialstoimprovetheabilitytowithstandtheharshstreetscapeenvironmentandroadsalt
application.MnDOTwasalsoengagedinthediscussionandaresupportiveoftheboulevard
treatments.
ACityCouncilworkshopwasheldonNovember9,2015toobtainfeedbackrelatedto
streetscapeimprovementsalongtheTH25and7th Streetcorridor;sidewalkandtrailextensions
andproposedassessmentrates.
OnDecember2,2015,apublicinputmeetingwasheldwiththepropertyownerswithinArea5.
Approximately22residentialandnon-residentialpropertyownersattendedthemeeting.All
whoattendedgenerallyunderstoodthatthestreetsproposedforreconstructionhavedeteriorated
tothepointthattheyrequireacompletereconstruction.
Duringthemeeting,theArea5propertyownerswereinformedthattheCityCouncilwas
consideringconstructionofnewsidewalkalongthewestsideofCedarbetween4th Streetand7th
Street,replacesidewalkalongthesouthsideofEastBroadway(CSAH75)betweenTH25and
WashingtonStreet,andconstructionofabituminoustrailonthewestsideofWashingtonStreet
withinArea5.Severalofthepropertyownersinattendancehadconcernsaboutthepotential
costsofthesidewalksandtrailsandappearedtobesupportiveofthetrailextensionalong
WashingtonStreet.OnepropertyowneralongCedarStreetwasnotinfavorofnewsidewalk
alongthewestsideofCedarStreet.
StaffalsometwiththeMonticelloSchoolDistrictandtheyweresupportiveoftheproject..They
notedsightlineandcrosswalkalignmentconcernsatCSAH75andWashingtonStreetwhich
willbereviewedduringfinaldesign.
InputreceivedfromCityCouncilandpropertyownershasbeenincorporatedintothisreport.
ProjectSchedule
Itisproposedtoconstructtheprojectinthesummerof2016,exceptthatitispossibleto
constructtheproposedretainingwallalong7th Streetthiswinter.Doingsomayreducethecost
oftheconstructionduetotheeliminationoftherequiredsheetpilingalongthecemeteryfence
linetostabilizetheslope.Theslopewouldbesaturatedtoafreezingcondition,allowingfor
stabilizationinthewinter.Constructingthewallthiswintercouldposeanestimated$200,000
constructioncostsavingsifsheetpilingisnotused.Thenetestimatedcostoftheretainingwall,
includingexcavation,removals,trafficcontrolandrestorationandindirectcostsare$350,000.
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
4
A1.BudgetImpact:Thetotalestimatedprojectcostandfundingforcompletingtheworkis
identifiedbelow.Thetotalestimatedprojectcostforcompletingtheworkdefinedhereintotals
$5,510,630forArea5streetandutilityimprovements,$1,763,510forTH25/7th Street
intersectionimprovementsand7th Streetreconstruction/sidewalkimprovements,$4,600forthe
4th StreetParkparkinglotimprovementsand$329,650forrecommendedsidewalkandtrail
improvementsonCedarStreet,WashingtonStreet,andBroadwayStreet.Thegrandtotalis
estimatedat$7,608,390.Thesecostsinclude10%contingencyand22%indirectcosts.
ProposedProjectFunding
Area5
ASSESSMENTS*
CITY
FUNDS TOTAL
STATEAID
ELIGIBLE
Street $1,224,381 $1,487,449$2,711,830 $663,300
Sanitary
Sewer -$1,161,350$1,161,350 -
Watermain -$915,890 $915,890 -
StormSewer -$223,060 $223,060 $17,850
PumpHouse $98,500 $98,500
TOTAL $1,224,381 $3,886,249$5,110,630 $681,150
*$92,414.50isforCity-OwnedProperty
ProposedProjectFunding
TH25/7th StreetTurnLanesandSignalImprovements
ASSESSMENTS
CITY
FUNDS TOTAL
STATEAID
ELIGIBLEAND
MNDOTLOCAL
INITIATIVE
FUNDS
7th Street
Reconand
Sidewalk(TH
25toCedar
Street)
$43,058.50 $124,321.50 $167,380 $167,380
TurnLanes
andSignal
Improvements
$0 $1,596,130$1,596,130 $1,548,040
TOTAL $43,058.50 $1,720,451.50 $1,763,510 $1,715,420
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
5
ProposedProjectFunding
AdditionalSidewalk/TrailandParkingImprovements
SCHEDULE TOTAL
BroadwayStSidewalkImprovements $55,190
4th StreetParkingLotImprovements $4,600
CedarStreetSidewalkImprovements(4th Streetto7th Street)$96,560*
CedarStreetSidewalkImprovements(4th StreettoBroadway
Street)$66,390*
WashingtonStreetTrailImprovements $111,510
TOTALPROJECTCOST–ADDITIONALPROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS $334,250
*IfthesidewalkalongCedarStreetisconstructed,anadditional$11,149.92wouldbe
collectedinassessmentsfrombenefittingnon-residentialproperties.
Thisprojectisproposedtobefundedusingstreetreconstructionbonds,capital
improvementfunds,utilityenterprisefundsandfuturebondissue,advancementofstate
aidfunds,possibleMnDOTlocalinitiativefundsandassessmentstobenefitting
properties.TheCity’sStateAidfundbalanceisapproximately$100,000,thereforethe
Citycanadvanceorborrowfundsfromfutureannualallocationstofundtheeligible
portionsoftheproject.Ifthe7th Streetretainingwallisconstructedthiswinter,the
constructioncostswouldnotbeeligibleforStateAidfundinggiventhetimingfor
MnDOTreviewandplanapproval.However,sincetheCitymustadvanceStateAid
fundsanyway,fundsarenotreadilyavailableanditisworththecostssavingsto
constructthewallthiswinter.StateAidfundscanthenbeusedforothercomponentsof
theproject.
Assessments:
Single-familyresidentialpropertyownersareproposedtobeassessedforstreet
constructionatarateof$4,500perlot/unitwithaccesstoanyofthereconstructedstreets.
Theprojectareaincludesafewduplexunitsandresidentialhomesthathavemultiple
dwellingunitsthatareclassifiedasmulti-familyunits.Theseunitsarecontainedwithin
oneparcelandthereforehaveonePID.Eachdwellingunitcontainedwithinoneparcelis
proposedtobeassessed$4,500perunit.
Thisstreetassessmentratereflectsa12.5%increaseoverthe2011StreetReconstruction
projectassessmentrates.Thiswascalculatedtoaccountforincreasesininflationandthe
constructioncostindexwhichisapproximately14%overthesametimeframe.
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
6
Non-residentiallotsareproposedtobeassessedforstreetreconstructionatarateof$100
perfrontfoot,withanadditional$13.50perfrontfootaddedforsidewalkassessments
whenappropriate.Pertheassessmentpolicy,thesenon-residentialratesareappliedto
100%ofthefrontfootageoftheproperties,50%ofthesidefootageaslongasthe
propertyhasdirectaccesstothereconstructedstreet,and25%ofthesidestreetifthe
propertydoesnothavedirectaccess.However,ifadirectaccessisaddedatalaterdate
thepropertywouldpaytheadditional25%atthattime.
PreviousassessmentsforpropertiesassessedwiththeCSAH75improvementproject
weretakenintoconsiderationwiththepreliminaryprojectassessmentsbasedonthe
abovemethodology.
Ashasbeenthecaseinthepast,assessmentswillbeappliedbasedonthecurrentuseof
thepropertyatthetimetheimprovementsaremade.However,iftheuseoftheproperty
changesinthefuture,theassessmentwouldbere-evaluatedatthetimebasedona30-
yearpavementlife,notincludingadditionalinterestcosts.Furthermore,anyexisting
singlefamilyparcelthatislargeenoughtosubdividewillbeassessedfortheadditional
unitatthetimethattheparcelisactuallysubdivided.
ShouldCouncilchoosetoconstructanysidewalksinthegridarea,theCity’spolicy
includesbenefittingpropertyownerstopayfor25%ofthesidewalkconstruction,with
theCitypayingtheremaining75%ofthecosts.Staffdiscussedthatresidential
assessmentsforsidewalkalongCedarStreetbewaivedsinceitfillsinsidewalkgapsand
enhancesthecoresidewalkgridsystemservingalargerareaoftheCity.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:WSBandCitystaffwillpreparethenecessary
documentsforthepublichearinginaccordancewithstatestatutes.WSBwill
preparetheplansandspecificationsforthe7th Streetretainingwall.Associated
engineeringfeesandrequiredlegalnoticesforthisworkareincludedinthe
projectcost.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
Decision1
1.MotiontoadoptResolution#2015-092acceptingtheFeasibilityReportand
callingforapublichearingonJanuary11,2016forthe2016Street
ReconstructionProject,CityProjectNo.15C001
2.MotiontodenyadoptionofResolution#2015-092atthistime.
Decision2
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
7
3.MotiontoadoptResolution#2015-093authorizingpreparationofplansand
specificationsandauthorizetheadvertisementofbidsforthe7th StreetRetaining
Wall,CityProjectNo.15C001
4.MotiontodenyadoptionofResolution#2015-093atthistime.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
CitystaffrecommendsapprovingAlternative#1asthisprojecthasbeenidentifiedinthe
City’sCapitalImprovementPlanandTransportationPlananditistimelytomove
forwardnow.StaffalsorecommendstheCouncilauthorizepreparationofplansand
specifications/authorizetheadvertisementofbidsforconstructionofthe7th Street
retainingwallthiswinterasaseparateprojectinordertolowercostsforsheetpilingto
stabilizetheslope.
StaffwillprovidetheCouncilatthemeetingwithoptionsfordifferentretainingwall
typestoreviewandselectforbiddingpurposes.Staffissupportiveofafieldstonetype
facewallwithanaturalcolorconsistentwiththeexistingCityentrancemonumentsigns.
Ananti-graffiticoatingwillbeappliedtothewallafterinstallation.Theprojectplansand
specificationsforthe7th Streetretainingwallwillincludegeneralparametersforthewall
designincludingwallheights,gradingplan,generalwalltypeandcolor.Thecontractor
willactuallycompletethedesignoftheretainingwalltoMnDOTstandardsusingthe
wallsupplier’slicensedengineer,forCityreviewandapproval,This“design-build”type
processistypicalforretainingwallconstructionover4feetinheight,sincethewall
designvariesforeachtypeofretainingwallblockused.Itisproposedtopresentthe
retainingwallbidresultstotheCouncilattheJanuary25,2016meeting.
Inaddition,PublicWorksstaffwereengagedisseveraldiscussionsrelatedtothe
streetscapeimprovementsalongTH25and7th Streetandtheyaresupportiveofthe
design.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
•Resolution#2015-092
•Resolution#2015-093
•FeasibilityReport
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2015-092
ACCEPTING THE FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC
HEARING FOR 2016 STREET RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT NO. 15C001
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the Council adopted June 22, 2015, a Feasibility Report
has been prepared by the City Engineer with reference to the 2016 Street Reconstruction
Improvements by improvements listed below:
1) ‘Area 5’- reconstruction of streets listed including the adjustment, construction,
reclamation, removal, and/or repair of existing pavement; curb and gutter; sanitary sewer,
storm sewer and water supply systems; pathways; traffic signals; signage; railway
crossings; and other necessary appurtenant work.
3rd Street and 4th Street between TH 25 and Washington Street
6th Street East from TH 25 to Cedar Street
Cedar and Ramsey Street from 7th Street East to East Broadway Street
Washington Street from the railroad tracks to East Broadway Street
Wright Street from 7th Street East to the railroad tracks
Palm, New, Wright, and Hennepin Streets between 4th Street East and East Broadway
Street;
2) TH 25/7th Street Intersection - reconstruction of streets listed including the adjustment,
construction, reclamation, removal, and/or repair of existing pavement; curb and gutter;
sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water supply systems; sidewalk; traffic signals; signage;
retaining walls, city entrance monument/plaza; landscaping; streetscape and other
necessary appurtenant work;
3) 4th Street Park Parking Lot Improvements;
4) Sidewalk and Trail Improvements – construction or reconstruction of sidewalk/trail
located along the west side of Cedar Street between 4th Street and 7th Street and along the
west side of Washington Street.
WHEREAS, the reports were received by the City Council on December 14, 2015; and
WHEREAS, the reports provide information regarding whether the proposed project is
necessary, cost-effective and feasible;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA:
1. The Council will consider the proposed improvements for such street in accordance with
the Feasibility Report and the assessment of abutting properties for all or a portion of the
cost of the improvements pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated
total cost of the improvements of $7,608,390.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 11th day of
January, 2016 in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 6:30 p.m. and the Clerk shall give
mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law.
ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 14th day of December, 2015.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
__________________________________
Brian Stumpf, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________________
Jeff O’Neill, City Administrator
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2015-093
AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE 7TH STREET RETAINING WALL,
CITY PROJECT NO. 15C001
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the City Council adopted June 22, 2015, a feasibility
report has been prepared by the city’s Consulting Engineer with reference to proposed public
improvements for the 7th Street Retaining wall, including the construction of a retaining wall at
the northwest corner of 7th Street and Cedar Street adjacent to Hillside cemetery; and
WHEREAS, the feasibility report was received by the City Council on December 14, 2015; and,
WHEREAS,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA:
1. City Council authorizes the preparation of plans and specifications for said project.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the
local official paper and Finance & Commerce trade paper an advertisement for bid
upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications.
The advertisement shall be published no less than three weeks before the last day for
submission of bids, once in the City’s legal publication and at least once in either a
newspaper published in a city of the first class or trade paper. To be eligible as a
trade paper, a publication shall have all the qualifications of a legal newspaper except
that, instead of the requirement that it shall contain general and local news, such trade
paper shall contain building and construction news of interest to contractors in this
state, among whom it shall have a general circulation.
The advertisement shall specify the work to be done, and shall state that bids will be
opened at 10 a.m. on January 10, 2016 and that the award of the bid and the
responsibility of the bidders will be considered by the City Council at 6:30 p.m. on
January 25, 2016, in the Council Chambers of City Hall. Any bidder whose
responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an
opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be
considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit,
cashier’s check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City for 5% of the amount
of such bid.
ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 14th day of December, 2015.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
__________________________________
Brian Stumpf, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________________
Jeff O’Neill, City Administrator
City of Monticello
505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 • Monticello, MN 55362
December 14, 2015
2016 Street Reconstruction
Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and
Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello
Wright County, Minnesota
City Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100
FEASIBILITY REPORT
2016 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT (AREA 5)
STREET, UTILITY, AND APPURTENANT IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF MONTICELLO PROJECT NO. 15C001
FOR THE
CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
December 14, 2015
Prepared By:
WSB & Associates, Inc.
701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
763-541-4800
763-541-1700 (Fax)
Building a legacy – your legacy. 701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763‐541‐4800
Fax: 763‐541‐1700
Equal Opportunity Employer
wsbeng.com
December 14, 2015
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Monticello
505 Walnut Street, Suite 1
Monticello, MN 55362
Re: Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100
Dear Mayor and City Council Members:
Transmitted herewith is a feasibility report for the proposed 2016 Street Reconstruction Project. This
report examines proposed improvements to be made within Area 5 of the Overall Street
Reconstruction Program, which was adopted by Council in February of 2004. This report also
addresses utility improvements within Area 5 and improvements to the intersection of Trunk
Highway (TH) 25 and 7th Street.
During the development of this report a public input meeting was conducted with property owners
from Area 5. The properties in these areas include a mix of residential and non-residential
properties. This report incorporates comments received from the property owners.
I would be happy to discuss this report with you at your convenience. Please feel free to call me at
763-271-3236 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Shibani K. Bisson, PE
City Engineer
Enclosure
cc: Jeff O’Neill, City Administrator, City of Monticello
Wayne Oberg, Finance Director, City of Monticello
Eric Eckman, WSB & Associates, Inc.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared
by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly
Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
Eric M. Eckman, PE
Date: December 14, 2015 License No. 49954
Quality Control Review By:
Shibani K. Bisson, PE
Date: December 14, 2015 License. No. 41860
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100
TITLE SHEET
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
CERTIFICATION SHEET
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 1
2. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 6
2.1 Authorization .................................................................................................................... 6
2.2 Program Overview ............................................................................................................ 6
2.3 Scope ................................................................................................................................. 7
3. EXISTING CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................... 8
3.1 Existing Soil Conditions ................................................................................................... 8
3.2 Water Main ....................................................................................................................... 8
3.3 Sanitary Sewer .................................................................................................................. 9
3.4 Storm Sewer/Drainage ...................................................................................................... 9
3.5 Streets ................................................................................................................................ 9
3.5.1 State Aid Routes ................................................................................................... 9
3.5.2 Existing Typical Street Sections and Pavement Ratings .................................... 10
3.6 Land Use ......................................................................................................................... 13
4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS .......................................................................................... 14
4.1 Street and Stormwater Improvements ............................................................................. 14
4.1.1 3rd and 6th Streets ................................................................................................ 14
4.1.2 4th Street .............................................................................................................. 15
4.1.3 Cedar Street (North of 7th Street) ........................................................................ 15
4.1.4 Palm, New, Wright, Ramsey, Hennepin, and Washington Streets ..................... 16
4.1.5 Cedar Street (South of 7th Street) – Future Construction .................................... 16
4.1.6 7th Street (TH 25 to Cedar) ................................................................................. 17
4.1.7 7th Street (Cedar Street to Ramsey Street) – Future Construction ...................... 18
4.1.8 TH 25 Northbound Right Turn Lane .................................................................. 19
4.1.9 TH 25 Southbound Turn Lane ............................................................................ 19
4.1.10 TH 25 & 7th Street Streetscape Improvements ................................................... 19
4.1.11 TH 25 at 7th Street Traffic Summary .................................................................. 20
4.1.12 Additional Sidewalk and Trail Improvements .................................................... 22
4.1.13 Other Considerations .......................................................................................... 23
4.1.14 Geotechnical Recommendations ........................................................................ 24
4.2 Stormwater Treatment ..................................................................................................... 24
4.3 Water Main Improvements ............................................................................................. 25
4.4 Sanitary Sewer Improvements ........................................................................................ 26
4.5 Construction Methods ..................................................................................................... 26
4.6 Private Utilities................................................................................................................ 27
4.7 Permits ............................................................................................................................ 28
4.8 Right-of-Way/Easements ................................................................................................ 28
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100
5. FINANCING ........................................................................................................................... 29
5.1 Opinion of Cost ............................................................................................................... 29
5.2 Funding ........................................................................................................................... 31
5.2.1 Assessments ........................................................................................................ 31
5.2.2 City Contribution ................................................................................................ 34
6. PROJECT SCHEDULE ......................................................................................................... 36
7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................... 37
Appendix A
Figure 1 – Project Scope
Figure 2 – Typical Sections, Area 5
Figure 3 – Typical Sections, 7th Street and TH 25
Figure 4 – Surface Improvements, Area 5, 7th Street, and TH 25
Figure 5 – Surface Improvements, 7th Street and TH 25 Intersection
Figure 6 – TH 25 & 7th Street Gateway Design Preliminary Masterplan
Figure 7 – TH 25 & 7th Street Gateway Design Preliminary Masterplan Enlargement
Figure 8 – TH 25 & 7th Street Gateway Design Elements
Figure 9 – TH 25 & 7th Street Turning Movements
Table 1 – TH 25 & 7th Street Analysis Summary
Figure 10 – Potential Sidewalk and Trail Improvements
Figure 11 – Utility Improvements, Area 5 (1 of 2)
Figure 12 – Utility Improvements, Area 5 (2 of 2)
Appendix B
Opinion of Probable Cost
Appendix C
Preliminary Assessment Roll – Area 5
Assessment Map – Area 5
Appendix D
Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
Radar Survey of Hillside Cemetery
Appendix E
Public Input Meeting Sign-in Sheet
Public Comment Summary
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 1
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City Project No. 15C001 continues the City’s Overall Street Reconstruction Program as adopted
by the Monticello City Council on February 9, 2004. The streets proposed to be reconstructed
include all streets within Area 5 of the Overall Street Reconstruction Program which total
approximately 14,050 feet in length and include:
3rd and 4th Streets East from TH 25 to Washington Street
6th Street East from TH 25 to Cedar Street
Cedar and Ramsey Street from 7th Street East to East Broadway Street (CSAH 75)
Washington Street from the railroad tracks to East Broadway Street (CSAH 75)
Wright Street from 7th Street East to the railroad tracks, as well as
Palm, New, Wright, and Hennepin Streets between 4th Street East and East Broadway
Street (CSAH 75)
Improvements to the 4th Street Park parking lot were also considered.
This report also investigates improvements to 7th Street from TH 25 to Cedar Street; Cedar Street
south of 7th Street East; and turn lane, signal, and streetscape improvements at the intersection of
TH 25 and 7th Street. A map showing the scope of the project area is included as Figure 1 in
Appendix A.
All streets within the proposed project areas were most recently evaluated and rated by City staff
in 2013. The ratings indicated a need for complete reconstruction of all streets within Area 5.
A City Council workshop was held on November 9, 2015, to obtain feedback related to
streetscape improvements along the TH 25 and 7th Street corridor, sidewalk and trail extensions,
and proposed assessment rates.
On December 2, 2015, a public input meeting was held with the property owners within Area 5.
Approximately 22 residential and non-residential property owners attended the meeting. All
who attended generally understood that the streets proposed for reconstruction have deteriorated
to the point that they require a complete reconstruction.
During the meeting, the Area 5 property owners were informed that the City Council was
considering construction of new sidewalk along the west side of Cedar Street between 4th Street
and 7th Street, replacing sidewalk along the south side of East Broadway (CSAH 75) between TH
25 and Washington Street, and construction of a bituminous trail on the west side of Washington
Street within Area 5. Several of the property owners in attendance had concerns about the
potential costs of the sidewalks and trails and appeared to be supportive of the trail extension
along Washington Street. One property owner along Cedar Street was not in favor of new
sidewalk along the west side of Cedar Street.
Staff also met with the Monticello School District and they were supportive of the project. They
noted sight line and crosswalk alignment concerns at CSAH 75 and Washington Street which
will be reviewed during final design.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 2
Input received from the City Council and property owners has been incorporated into this report.
The following provides more detail on the proposed improvements.
Area 5
The streets within the project areas include removing and replacing the bituminous pavement and
underlying soils, while maintaining the existing widths. Existing curb and gutter will be
salvaged wherever possible. Exceptions to this would include those curb and gutter panels in
need of repair, and where the replacement of sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and/or water main is
required.
Existing sidewalk will be salvaged wherever possible. Exceptions to this would include those
sidewalk panels in need of repair, and where the replacement of sanitary and/or water services is
required.
The City Council should consider construction of a new 6-foot-wide concrete sidewalk along the
east side of Cedar Street between Broadway Street and 4th Street and on the west side of Cedar
Street between 4th Street and 7th Street to accommodate pedestrian facilities on both sides of the
roadway to funnel users to the intersection at 4th Street and TH 25, where a traffic signal is
planned for the future per the City’s transportation plan. Construction of sidewalk/trail facilities
along relatively higher-traffic roadways and collector roadways should be considered in order to
limit pedestrian and bicycle crossings and improve safety.
A 10-foot-wide bituminous trail is being proposed along the west side of Washington Street as
this roadway will have an increase in traffic volume with the Fallon Avenue overpass and will
provide a connection to the existing trail along 7th Street with the future roundabout at 7th Street
and Washington Street.
The utility improvements within Area 5 include the following:
Replace or line all of the sanitary sewer mains
Replace all of the sanitary sewer services from the mainline to the property line
Replace the majority of the sanitary sewer castings
Replace water main valves and hydrants
Replace storm sewer pipe and structures and castings where needed
Install new storm sewer pipe and structures where needed to improve drainage conditions
Extend 16-inch water main to feed future water treatment
Pump house piping improvements for Wells #1 and #2
Sidewalk and Trail Connections
Staff evaluated connecting the sidewalk and trail gaps that are currently present within the
project area that would benefit both the residents and businesses within the project area. These
connections also provide continuity to the overall sidewalk and trail corridors within the core
area of the City that then extend to regional system connections.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 3
Cedar Street Sidewalk: The City Council should consider construction of a new 6-foot-
wide concrete sidewalk along the east side of Cedar Street between Broadway Street and
4th Street as well as the west side of Cedar Street between 4th Street and 7th Street to
accommodate pedestrian facilities on both sides of the roadway to funnel users to the
intersection at 4th Street and TH 25, where a traffic signal is planned for the future per the
City’s transportation plan. Construction of sidewalk/trail facilities along relatively
higher-traffic roadways and collector roadways should be considered in order to limit
pedestrian and bicycle crossings and improve safety.
Washington Street Trail: A 10-foot-wide bituminous trail is being proposed along the
west side of Washington Street as this roadway will have an increase in traffic volume
with the Fallon Avenue overpass and will provide a connection to the existing trail along
7th Street with the future roundabout at 7th Street and Washington Street.
Other pedestrian and bicycle improvements that are evaluated in the report include:
Replacement of sidewalk along the south side of East Broadway Street between
Cedar Street and Washington Street
Bituminous trail along the south side of the railroad corridor between Cedar Street
and Washington Street
TH 25/7th Street Intersection
Improvements to the intersection include the following:
7th Street East:
Reconstruct bituminous pavement to match existing 44-foot width between TH 25
and Cedar Street
Construct a right turn lane along westbound 7th Street between TH 25 and Cedar
Street
Install modular block retaining wall between the proposed right turn lane and the
Hillside Cemetery fence
Construct a retaining wall and install landscaping at the northwest corner of 7th
Street and Cedar Street adjacent to Hillside Cemetery
Install 6-foot-wide concrete sidewalk on the south side of 7th Street from TH 25 to
Cedar Street
Signal improvements including flashing yellow arrows at the TH 25 approaches
with center left turn lane striping between TH 25 and Cedar Street
A 2-inch bituminous mill and overlay between Cedar Street and Ramsey Street is
proposed to be completed as a separate project in the same year as the Fallon
Avenue Overpass Project potentially in 2017
A bituminous overlay of the trail along the north side of 7th Street between Cedar
Street and Ramsey Street is proposed to be completed as a separate project in the
same year as the Fallon Avenue Overpass Project potentially in 2017
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 4
Cedar Street (South of 7th Street):
Reconstruct bituminous pavement and add curb and gutter and storm sewer where
appropriate
This improvement is proposed to be completed as a separate project in the same
year as the Fallon Avenue Overpass Project potentially in 2017
TH 25:
Construct northbound and southbound right turn lanes at 7th Street
Signal improvements including flashing yellow arrows at the 7th Street
approaches
Complete streetscape improvements along the TH 25 corridor between 7th Street
and 6th Street
Construct City entrance monument/plaza at the northeast corner of TH 25 and 7th
Street
Install 6-foot-wide concrete sidewalk and boulevard treatments on the west side
from 7th Street to 6th Street
Install 8-foot-wide concrete sidewalk and boulevard treatments on the east side
from 7th Street to 6th Street
Install modular block retaining wall on the east side north and south of 7th Street
Other pedestrian and bicycle improvements that are evaluated in the report include:
Replacement of sidewalk along the south side of East Broadway Street between Cedar
Street and Washington Street
Bituminous trail along the south side of the railroad corridor between Cedar Street and
Washington Street
The total estimated project cost for completing the work defined herein totals $5,115,230 for
Area 5 improvements including the parking lot improvements; $1,737,370 for TH 25/7th Street
improvements; $300,600 for recommended sidewalk and trail improvements on Cedar Street, 7th
Street, and Washington Street; and $55,190 for recommended sidewalk improvements along
Broadway Street. The grand total is estimated at $7,208,390. These costs include 10%
contingency and 22% indirect costs. This project is proposed to be funded using street
reconstruction bonds, capital improvement funds, utility enterprise funds and future bond issue,
advancement of State Aid funds, potential MnDOT local initiative funds, and assessments to
benefitting properties.
Single-family residential property owners are proposed to be assessed for street construction at a
rate of $4,500 per lot/unit with access to any of the reconstructed streets. The project area
includes a few duplex units and residential homes that have multiple dwelling units that are
classified as multi-family units. These units are contained within one parcel, and therefore, have
one PID. Each dwelling unit contained within one parcel is proposed to be assessed $4,500 per
unit.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 5
This street assessment rate reflects a 12.5% increase over the 2011 Street Reconstruction Project
assessment rates, which were increased 5% from the rates assessed with the 2010 Street
Reconstruction Project. This was calculated to account for increases in inflation and the
construction cost index which is approximately 14% over the same time frame.
Non-residential lots are proposed to be assessed for street reconstruction at a rate of $100 per
front foot, with an additional $13.50 per front foot added for sidewalk assessments when
appropriate. Per the assessment policy, these non-residential rates are applied to 100% of the
front footage of the properties, 50% of the side footage as long as the property has direct access
to the reconstructed street, and 25% of the side street if the property does not have direct access.
However, if a direct access is added at a later date, the property would pay the additional 25% at
that time.
Previous assessments for properties assessed with the CSAH 75 Improvement Project were taken
into consideration with the preliminary project assessments based on the above methodology.
As has been the case in the past, assessments will be applied based on the current use of the
property at the time the improvements are made. However, if the use of the property changes in
the future, the assessment would be re-evaluated at the time based on a 30-year pavement life,
not including additional interest costs.
Should Council choose to construct any sidewalks in the grid area, the City’s policy includes
benefitting property owners paying for 25% of the sidewalk construction, with the City paying
the remaining 75% of the costs. Staff discussed that residential assessments for sidewalk along
Cedar Street be waived since it fills in sidewalk gaps and enhances the core sidewalk grid system
serving a larger area of the City.
It is proposed to construct the above improvements in the summer/fall of 2016 with the
exception of the retaining wall for the 7th Street right turn lane. Construction of this wall is
proposed to occur as a separate project in February/March 2016 in order to excavate the soil and
stabilize the slope given frozen ground conditions to eliminate the need for sheet piling.
This project is necessary, feasible, and cost-effective from an engineering standpoint and can be
constructed as proposed herein.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 6
2. INTRODUCTION
2.1 Authorization
The preparation of this report was authorized by the City Council on June 22, 2015, as a
continuation of the Overall Street Reconstruction Program adopted by the City Council on
February 9, 2004. This project has been designated as City Project No. 15C001.
2.2 Program Overview
The following report addresses the eighth street reconstruction project, identified as Area 5, in
the City’s Overall Street Reconstruction Program adopted in 2004. This project includes all of
Area 5, as well as intersection improvements at TH 25 and 7th Street. These streets were
scheduled to be reconstructed earlier, but due to budget constraints in recent years, several areas
of the program were split into smaller projects thereby delaying the completion of the overall
program as originally proposed.
In 2003, City staff rated all of the streets in the Overall Street Reconstruction Program based on
the condition of the existing pavement, the existing curb, underground public utilities, and
existing sidewalk. This data was then utilized to provide a Pavement Condition Index (PCI)
rating for all streets proposed for improvements. PCI ratings are based on a scale of 0 to 100,
with 0 indicating an extremely poor street with a failed pavement structure and 100 indicating a
newly constructed street. These PCI ratings were then tabulated for each improvement area
which resulted in the creation of the Overall Street Reconstruction Program. This program,
adopted by the City Council on February 9, 2004, was subsequently used to develop a Capital
Improvement Program for the reconstruction of streets identified within each project area.
In 2015 the streets in Area 5 were reviewed by City staff. The results indicated that the streets
were continuing to deteriorate and that if new PCI ratings were to be calculated, they would be
substantially worse than the 2013 ratings, and would, therefore, not affect the recommendation to
reconstruct all of the streets.
As such, all streets in Area 5 are recommended for reconstruction in 2016 with the exception of:
7th Street between Cedar Street and Ramsey Street
Cedar Street south of 7th Street
Washington Street between the railroad tracks and 7th Street
These streets are proposed to be improved in the same year as the Fallon Avenue Overpass
Project potentially in 2017 based on the current street condition and improvements needed. In
addition, the above-noted segments of 7th Street and Washington Street will be impacted by the
Fallon Avenue overpass construction; therefore, it is prudent to delay these improvements until
that time.
The locations of the proposed streets to be reconstructed are shown in Figure 1 in Appendix A.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 7
2.3 Scope
The scope of this feasibility report includes the reconstruction of all streets located in Area 5 as
defined in the 2004 Overall Street Reconstruction Program, utility improvements within the
rights-of-way within Area 5, and intersection improvements at TH 25 and 7th Street.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 8
3. EXISTING CONDITIONS
3.1 Existing Soil Conditions
A total of 28 new soil borings were taken in September 2015, and the results were used to
determine the subsurface soil conditions beneath the streets proposed for reconstruction with this
project. Three of the borings were taken in areas proposed for right turn lanes at the intersection
of TH 25 and 7th Street, and the remaining 25 were taken in Area 5. It should be noted that most
of the borings were taken when groundwater is typically low so groundwater elevations are
likely higher than the borings are indicating. As such, this report assumes that dewatering will
not be an issue during construction, and that sump pumps should be sufficient for dewatering.
The Area 5 borings north of 7th Street generally encountered 5 inches of bituminous surfacing
underlain aggregate base like material on the east/west streets. Some of the north/south streets
contained soil that could not be differentiated from the underlying subgrade soils which
consisted of sandy soils with varying amounts of gravel. Clayey sands were identified in the
borings along 4th Street. Groundwater was identified in three of the borings in the project area
on 4th Street, New Street, and Ramsey Street 10½ to 12½ feet below the surface and one of the
borings in the project area on Cedar Street 3½ feet below the surface. The report assumes this is
perched groundwater confined by the clayey sand layer below.
The 7th Street borings generally encountered 5 to 6 inches of bituminous surfacing over 12 to 18
inches of aggregate base like material, which is underlain by silty sand with gravel. No
groundwater was present in the borings taken along 7th Street.
The TH 25 borings were taken outside of the existing pavement in order to determine the soils
within the construction area of the proposed right turn lanes. Silty sand and clayey sands were
identified in the borings. No groundwater was present in the borings taken along TH 25.
The soil borings generally indicate that the existing street subgrade soils consist of silty to poorly
graded sand, and are therefore suitable subgrade soils for street construction. However, when
silty and clayey sand soils are at or above their optimum moisture contents they will be unstable
and will require farming and drying, or alternatively a sub cut could be completed with the soil
being replaced with compacted select granular material. For this reason the report from AET is
recommending a sand subbase layer along 4th Street as well as the turn lanes along TH 25.
The borings also indicate that the existing street subgrade soils appear suitable for the support
and bedding of utilities. The Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review, including all soil
borings, is included herein as Appendix D.
3.2 Water Main
In Area 5, the majority of the trunk water main was installed in the 1950’s and 1960’s and
consists of 6- to 8-inch-diameter cast iron pipe (CIP) with approximately 8 to 10 feet of cover. A
portion of this was replaced with 12-inch ductile iron pipe (DIP) along Ramsey Street from 7th
Street to 4th Street in 2003. The existing water main system was tested for leaks in 2010 and no
leaks were detected. Based on visual inspections of several sections of water main in Area 5 by
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 9
the City’s water department, the pipe appears to be in very good condition and as such is not
recommended to be replaced with this project. The hydrants and valves are nearing the end of
their useful lives so all valves and hydrants will be replaced.
The water main system within the project area provides adequate pressure and fire flows to
adjacent properties.
There is also a 10-inch DIP water main extending from the well house off of Cedar Street
between 3rd and East Broadway Streets that extends along the west side of Cedar Street just to
the south of 3rd Street. When this water main was installed in 1988, the intent was to provide a
connection to route the water from the existing well house from Wells #1 and #2, to a future
water treatment plant just to the south of Interstate 94, adjacent to the reservoir site at 203
Chelsea Road.
3.3 Sanitary Sewer
Area 5, east of TH 25, is mostly served by a gravity trunk sanitary sewer comprised of 8- to 12-
inch-diameter vitrified clay pipe (VCP) that was installed in the 1950’s and 1960’s with
approximately 6 to 15 feet of cover. A portion of the sewer along 4th Street is 8-inch poly vinyl
chloride pipe (PVC). The existing trunk line is generally located along the centerline of each
street and conveys wastewater to the City’s wastewater treatment facility.
The sewer in Area 5 has been televised numerous times over the years, and was televised again
in 2015. When the ground water was at its highest, numerous groundwater leaks were detected.
Based on City staff’s review of the existing televising tapes, some of the existing VCP sanitary
sewer is in adequate condition to meet the needs of the residents during the design lives of the
reconstructed streets and as such does not need to be replaced with this project. These segments
will be lined using a trenchless method of installation. However, certain sections will need to be
replaced due to excessive sagging and/or cracking and root intrusion.
3.4 Storm Sewer/Drainage
The existing roadways within Area 5 have curb and gutter to collect stormwater runoff and
transport it via storm sewer to outlets along the banks of the Mississippi River located at Cedar
Street, New Street, Ramsey Street and Washington Street. There are no existing treatment
facilities such as ponds in this area.
3.5 Streets
3.5.1 State Aid Routes
7th Street, Washington Street, Cedar Street between 7th Street and 4th Street, and 4th Street
between TH 25 and Cedar Street are all designated as State Aid routes.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 10
3.5.2 Existing Typical Street Sections and Pavement Ratings
All of the north/south streets within Area 5 were constructed in 1977 and include B618
curb and gutter. The widths of the streets are all 36 feet from curb-face to curb-face, and
all are within 80-foot rights-of-way, except for Cedar Street which is 38 feet wide within
an 80-foot right-of-way and Washington Street which is 44 feet wide within 100 feet of
right-of-way.
All of the east/west streets within Area 5 were constructed in 1977 and include B618 curb
and gutter. The widths of the streets are all 40 feet from curb-face to curb-face, and all
are within 80-foot rights-of-way.
7th Street, between Cedar Street and Washington Street, was most recently reconstructed
in 2001. At that time the roadway was widened with the addition of curb and gutter to 44
feet wide within an 80-foot right-of-way.
Cedar Street south of 7th Street was constructed in the 1970’s as a rural section. A small
portion of curb is present along the VFW property on the west side of the street. The
existing pavement width varies from 24 to 38 feet wide within a 66-foot right-of-way.
Parking is allowed on both sides of the roadway and is fully utilized during events at the
VFW.
The most recent PCI ratings for these streets are shown in Tables 1 and 2 below.
TABLE 1
Existing PCI Ratings of Proposed Improvement Areas – Area 5 (2016)
Street Name From To 2013 PCI Maintenance
Method
3rd St E TH 25 Washington St 26-35 (31) Reconstruct
4th St E TH 25 Washington St 13-53 (30) Reconstruct
6th St E TH 25 Cedar St 22 Reconstruct
7th St E TH 25 Cedar St 28 Reconstruct
Cedar St East Broadway 7th St E 10-46 (28) Reconstruct
Palm St East Broadway 3rd St E 38-42 (40) Reconstruct
New St East Broadway 3rd St E 35-39 (37) Reconstruct
Wright St East Broadway 4th St E 18-30 (24) Reconstruct
Wright St (CDS) 7th St E Cul-de-sac 20 Reconstruct
Ramsey St East Broadway 4th St E 15-36 (25) Reconstruct
Hennepin St East Broadway 3rd St E 34-38 (36) Reconstruct
Washington St East Broadway 7th St E 41-42 (42) Reconstruct
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 11
TABLE 2
Existing PCI Ratings of Additional Proposed Improvement Areas (2017)
Street Name From To 2013 PCI Maintenance
Method
Cedar St 7th St E I-94 ROW 31 Reconstruct
7th St E Cedar St Ramsey St 73-75 (74) Mill & Overlay
Pavement Management System (PMS) software was utilized to calculate the data from
the ratings to achieve the Pavement Condition Index (PCI), which is based on the
physical condition of the streets. The PCI is obtained from a field inspection of every
square yard of street surface measuring both the quantity and the type (severity) of
distresses in the pavement. Some examples of typical pavement distresses that are found
in these streets include transverse and longitudinal cracking, block cracking, and alligator
cracking. Representative pictures of these types of pavement distresses are shown below.
Longitudinal Cracking Block Cracking Alligator Cracking
The calculation of the PCI value for an individual street takes into account the total area
of distresses encountered and the severity of the distresses. The field inspection was
completed by staff from the Monticello Public Works Department, with assistance from
WSB and Associates, in accordance with the flexible “Pavement Distress Manual”
prepared by the Minnesota Local Road Research Board (MLRRB). This is a commonly
used pavement rating system and was utilized in our past street rating operations. Areas
with the lowest PCI values represent streets exhibiting the highest levels of distresses in
the pavement, while areas with the highest PCI values represent streets with the lowest
levels of pavement distresses. The following table shows the general relationship of the
PCI to the recommended maintenance strategies.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 12
TABLE 3
PCI Range Street Characteristics Maintenance
Method
Additional Items
Often Repaired
70 - 100
Low to medium severity potholes,
frost cracking, medium severity
transverse cracking, aggregate
polishing, low severity raveling
Routine Maintenance /
Crack Seal / Sealcoat
Spot patching, gate valve
adjustments
36 - 69
Low to medium severity longitudinal
and transverse cracking, low and
moderate severity edge and curb
cracking and spalling, low to medium
severity block cracking, medium
severity raveling
Patch / Repair /
Resurface / Overlay
Raise manhole castings, adjust
gate valves, repair or replace
cracked or spalled curb, repair or
replace catch basin castings
0 - 35
Medium to high severity longitudinal
and transverse cracking, medium to
high severity reflective cracking,
alligator cracking, medium to high
severity potholes, high severity edge
and curb cracking and spalling,
rutting, excessive skin patching, high
severity raveling, medium to high
severity frost heaving
Reclaim and Recycle /
Reconstruct / Upgrade
Replace or install sanitary sewer,
replace or install storm sewer,
replace or install water main,
replace utility castings, adjust road
grade and alignment, replace or
install curb and gutter
Each of these maintenance strategies has its own life cycle, as well as its part in
extending the life of the overall pavement section.
Streets with PCI ratings from 0 to 35 indicate the presence of several distresses in the
pavement and it is difficult to quantify the amount of distresses given that there are so
many. As a result, comparing the ratings in this range, for example whether it is a 2 or a
20, does not result in a significant change in the type of maintenance method for these
streets or make the street with the higher PCI rating in better condition than the street
with the lower PCI rating. It is therefore recommended that a street with a PCI below 35
be reconstructed for these reasons.
All streets within Area 5 and are exhibiting significant pavement distresses as described
above. Following are descriptions of the relative ratings for each street within Area 5.
3rd and 4th Streets East (TH 25 to Washington Street): These streets were last
reconstructed in 1977, with the addition of curb and bituminous pavement, and had an
average PCI rating between 30 and 31 in 2013. Patching has been completed in these
roadways in the past.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 13
6th Street East (TH 25 to Cedar Street): 6th Street East was last reconstructed in 1986 and
had an average PCI rating of 22 in 2013. Patching has been completed on this roadway
in the past.
7th Street East (Pine Street/TH 25 to Cedar Street): This segment of 7th Street East was
last reconstructed in 1982 and had an average PCI rating of 28 in 2013. Patching has
been completed on this roadway in the past.
7th Street East (Cedar Street/TH 25 to Ramsey Street): 7th Street East was last
reconstructed in 2001 and had an average PCI rating between 72 and 75 in 2013. The
roadway was widened with the addition of curb and gutter in 2001 to the current 44-foot
width and the pavement was reclaimed and paved at that time. Patching has been
completed on this roadway in the past.
Cedar Street (East Broadway to 7th Street East): Cedar Street was last reconstructed in
1977 and had an average PCI rating of 27 in 2013. Patching has been completed on this
roadway.
Cedar Street (South of 7th Street East): This segment of Cedar Street was last
reconstructed in 1977 and had an average PCI rating of 31 in 2013. Patching has been
completed on this roadway and a 1-inch overlay was recently placed within the past two
years.
Palm, New, Wright, Ramsey, Hennepin and Washington Streets (East Broadway to 7th
Street East): These streets were last reconstructed in 1977 and had PCI ratings ranging
from 24 to 40 in 2013.
It should be noted that one of the goals of the Overall Street Reconstruction Program was
to leave each area with a consistent quality and life span for each roadway. This goal was
taken into account when evaluating the quality of each street. In addition, the
recommendations of AET’s Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review (see
Appendix D) and the quality of the underlying soil impacts the determination of the
appropriate maintenance strategy.
3.6 Land Use
The properties affected by the proposed improvements in Area 5 north of 7th Street are a mix of
both single-family residential, multi-family residential, and non-residential properties, all of
which are proposed to be assessed for the project improvements to varying degrees. There are
also five parcels owned by the City in Area 5, which include the Hillside Cemetery, the DMV
and adjacent parking lots, and the 4th Street Park.
The majority of Area 5 is zoned single family and 2-3 residential dwellings with a small mixture
of multi-family housing and neighborhood business.
The properties along 7th Street and Cedar Street are a mixture of apartments, multi-family,
regional business and industrial and business campus district.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 14
4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
4.1 Street and Stormwater Improvements
This feasibility report presents a design that salvages a portion of the existing concrete
curb and gutter, utilizes existing drainage systems, and seeks to minimize impacts to
residents and businesses during construction.
4.1.1 3rd and 6th Streets
Street Design:
3rd Street is currently 40 feet wide from face-of-curb to face-of-curb between TH 25 and
Washington Street. 6th Street is currently 40 feet wide from face-of-curb to face-of-curb
between TH 25 and Cedar Street. Staff is proposing to maintain this 40-foot width for
both streets. The typical section for 3rd and 6th Streets can be seen on Figure 2, and the
proposed surface improvements are shown on Figure 4.
The entire pavement section of these streets will be reconstructed and the existing B618
curb and gutter will remain in place, except for any panels needing replacement to correct
defects within the panel, to restore the existing flow line and grade where the curb has
settled, where differential settlement has occurred, or where utilities work will require the
curb to be removed and replaced. Spot repairs will receive a full-depth saw cut to
minimize disruption to the curb adjacent to the repair area. Hydraulic jacking could also
be utilized, which would involve injecting a concrete mix to repair small segments of the
curb. This method may be less expensive and provide fewer impacts to the adjacent curb.
A new access to Hillside Cemetery is proposed from 6th Street due to the removal of the
access off of 7th Street as part of the turn lane improvements.
Stormwater Improvements:
The majority of the existing storm sewer system is proposed to be left in place on both
streets. However, several catch basin rings and castings do need to be replaced and some
work will be required on other existing pipes and structures.
Staff has indicated that the pipe located just east of TH 25 on 3rd Street freezes in the
winter time due to the existing depth of the pipe which is currently 19 inches deep from
the catch basin rim to the invert of the existing pipe. It is proposed that the pipe be
lowered and rerouted to the east in order to eliminate this issue.
Staff has also indicated that the catch basin located in the southwest radius and 6th Street
and Cedar Street has been hit several times when snow plowing the intersections. It is
proposed to relocate this catch basin further west to address this issue. The storm sewer
improvements are shown on Figure 11.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 15
4.1.2 4th Street
Street Design:
4th Street has existing B618 concrete curb and gutter and will have the complete
pavement section removed prior to receiving a new pavement section. The width of the
street will remain at 40 feet wide. The typical section for 4th Street can be seen on Figure
2, and the proposed surface improvements are shown on Figure 4.
The entire pavement section of these streets will be reconstructed and the existing curb
and gutter will remain in place, except for any panels needing replacement to correct
defects within the panel, to restore the existing flow line and grade where the curb has
settled, where differential settlement has occurred, or where utilities work will require the
curb to be removed and replaced. Spot repairs will receive a full-depth saw cut to
minimize disruption to the curb adjacent to the repair area. Hydraulic jacking could also
be utilized, which would involve injecting a concrete mix to repair small segments of the
curb. This method may be less expensive and provide fewer impacts to the adjacent curb.
The entire south curb line along 4th Street is planned to be replaced between Cedar Street
and Ramsey Street due to the installation of the proposed 10-inch water main.
Stormwater Improvements:
The majority of the existing storm sewer system is proposed to be left in place. However,
several catch basin rings and castings do need to be replaced and some work will be
required on other existing pipes and structures due to the replacement of the sanitary
sewer and installation of the proposed 10-inch DIP water main. The storm sewer
improvements are shown on Figure 11.
4.1.3 Cedar Street (North of 7th Street)
Street Design:
Cedar Street has existing B618 concrete curb and gutter and will have the complete
pavement section removed prior to receiving a new pavement section. The width of the
street will remain at 38 feet wide. The typical section for Cedar Street can be seen on
Figure 2, and the proposed surface improvements are shown on Figure 4.
The existing curb and gutter will remain in place, except for any panels needing
replacement to correct defects within the panel, to restore the existing flow line and grade
where the curb has settled, where differential settlement has occurred, or where utilities
work will require the curb to be removed and replaced. Spot repairs will receive a full-
depth saw cut to minimize disruption to the curb adjacent to the repair area. Hydraulic
jacking could also be utilized, which would involve injecting a concrete mix to repair
small segments of the curb. This method may be less expensive and provide fewer
impacts to the adjacent curb.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 16
Stormwater Improvements:
The existing storm sewer system is proposed to be left in place. Some work will be
required on other existing pipes, structures and castings. The storm sewer improvements
are shown on Figures 11 and 12.
4.1.4 Palm, New, Wright, Ramsey, Hennepin, and Washington Streets
Street Design:
These streets all have existing B618 concrete curb and gutter and will have the complete
pavement section removed prior to receiving a new pavement section, including
aggregate base class 5. The width of these streets will remain at 36 feet wide with the
exception of Wright Street south of the railroad tracks which will match its existing width
of 32 feet. The typical sections these streets can be seen on Figure 2 and all proposed
surface improvements are shown on Figures 4.
The existing curb and gutter will remain in place, except for any panels needing
replacement to correct defects within the panel, to restore the existing flow line and grade
where the curb has settled, or where differential settlement has occurred. These spot
repairs will receive a full-depth saw cut to minimize disruption to the curb adjacent to the
repair area. Hydraulic jacking can also be utilized, which would involve injecting a
concrete mix to repair small segments of the curb. This method may be less expensive
and provide fewer impacts to the adjacent curb.
Stormwater Improvements:
The existing storm sewer system on these streets is proposed to be left in place. A couple
of catch basins will need to be replaced however, and some work will be required on
other existing pipes, structures and castings on these streets. The storm sewer
improvements are shown on Figures 11 and 12.
4.1.5 Cedar Street (South of 7th Street) – Future Construction
Street Design:
The entire pavement section of this street is proposed to be reconstructed in 2017 with
options to either install curb and gutter and fill in the existing ditches or reconstruct and
maintain the existing ditches. A new pavement section will then be constructed including
aggregate base class 5. The typical section for this street can be seen on Figure 2, and
the proposed surface improvements are shown on Figure 4.
Stormwater Improvements:
The existing storm sewer system on Cedar Street consists of ditches on either side of
Cedar that drain to the storm sewer system on 7th Street. This system is proposed to be
left in place in order to maintain drainage from the adjacent properties, but new storm
sewer catch basins and pipes are proposed in order to capture the roadway drainage prior
to reaching 7th Street. The storm sewer improvements are shown on Figure 12.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 17
4.1.6 7th Street (TH 25 to Cedar)
Street Design:
Based on the pavement condition, the entire pavement section of 7th Street between TH
25 and Cedar Street is recommended to be reconstructed. The roadway would be re-
striped with a center left turn lane for westbound traffic. It is not proposed to complete
any access modifications to the Perkins restaurant located at 700 Pine Street (TH 25).
Staff will contact Perkins to discuss any access concerns during final design.
The width of the street will be increased from 44 feet wide to 56 feet wide to
accommodate the proposed right turn lane at TH 25. The right turn turning radius will be
designed with a larger radius to the maximum extent possible to accommodate vehicles
turning. The addition of the turn lane would require the relocation of the cemetery access
that is currently off of 7th Street. Staff has suggested adding a new access off of 6th
Street. The typical section for 7th Street can be seen on Figure 3, and the proposed
surface improvements are shown on Figures 4 and 5. Additional information regarding
the turn lane justification can be found it Section 4.1.10
The existing curb and gutter will remain in place on the south side, except for any panels
needing replacement to correct defects within the panel, to restore the existing flow line
and grade where the curb has settled, where differential settlement has occurred, or where
utilities work will require the curb to be removed and replaced. Spot repairs will receive
a full-depth saw cut to minimize disruption to the curb adjacent to the repair area.
Hydraulic jacking could also be utilized, which would involve injecting a concrete mix to
repair small segments of the curb. This method may be less expensive and provide fewer
impacts to the adjacent curb.
Retaining Wall:
The existing limestone retaining wall on the north side of 7th Street will be required to be
removed as part of the proposed turn lane construction. A new modular block retaining
wall is proposed along 7th Street along the back side of the sidewalk in order to support
the soils. The wall will vary in height between 6½ to 7½ feet and span the entire length
of 7th Street between TH 25 and Cedar Street. An anti-graffiti coating will be applied to
the wall after installation. Staff is supportive of a fieldstone type face wall with a natural
color consistent with the existing City entrance monument signs. There will be
approximately 3 to 5 feet between the existing cemetery fence and the proposed retaining
wall. Due to the proximity of the existing grave sites and the required excavation behind
a modular block retaining wall, sheet piling would be required to support the soils during
the construction of the wall. During the preliminary design process, a poured concrete
wall was also considered, but the cost to construct the wall would significantly increase
and sheet piling would still be required along 7th Street. Other methods to stabilize the
slope were evaluated including concrete jet grouting that is pumped into the slope;
however, this method is more costly than sheet piling.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 18
It is possible to construct the proposed retaining wall along 7th Street this winter. Doing
so may reduce the cost of the construction due to the elimination of the required sheet
piling. The slope could be saturated to a freezing condition, allowing for stabilization in
the winter. Another option would be to delay the construction of the retaining wall until
the following winter (2016/2017). If staff elects to do this, it is recommended that the all
of the turn lane work at TH 25 and 7th Street be delayed until 2017.
As part of the investigation in this area, AET performed ground penetrating radar from
the existing retaining wall to approximately 20 feet inside of the cemetery fence line to
determine if there may be any caskets outside of the existing fence line. Their findings
can be found in the Radar Survey of Hillside Cemetery, which is included in Appendix D.
Sixteen anomalies were identified between 2 and 4 feet below the ground surface. These
anomalies could indicate buried debris, variation in soil characteristics or possible
casket/burial remains. Per the recommendation of the City attorney, the State
archaeologist was notified of the anomalies and he suggested completing spot removal of
the soil to investigate the area. Parks department staff first probed and then excavated
material to a 4-foot depth where the anomalies were detected. No burial remains were
found. A distinct orange-colored aggregate layer was found consistently throughout the
area at a 2- to 4-foot depth. This area, between the cemetery fence and the existing
limestone retaining wall, likely has never been excavated and is virgin ground based on
the soil layering observed with the excavations.
Based on these findings, it is highly likely that burial remains will be encountered during
construction. State statute 138.40 identifies the process the City must follow if burial
remains are discovered and the procedures for removal and relocation to another site.
4.1.7 7th Street (Cedar Street to Ramsey Street) – Future Construction
Street Design:
Based on the condition of the roadway, the entire pavement section of this street is
recommended to be reconditioned with a 2-inch mill and overlay in 2017 with the
existing B618 curb and gutter left in place, except any panels needing repair. This will
allow this entire portion of 7th Street East to be on the same maintenance schedule for
future improvements between TH 25 and Ramsey Street. The width of the street will
remain at 44 feet wide. The proposed surface improvements in 2017 are shown on Figure
4.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 19
4.1.8 TH 25 Northbound Right Turn Lane
Street Design:
The existing B624 concrete curb and gutter along the east side of TH 25 will be replaced
in order to construct the new turn lane. A new pavement section will then be constructed,
including aggregate base class 5 and select granular borrow to match the existing typical
section of this section of TH 25. The width of the street will be increased from 44 feet
wide to 56 feet wide to accommodate the proposed right turn lane at TH 25. The typical
section for this street can be seen on Figure 3, and the proposed surface improvements
are shown on Figures 4 and 5. Additional information regarding the turn lane
justification can be found it Section 4.1.10
Sidewalk:
A new 6-foot-wide concrete sidewalk is proposed to be constructed along the east side of
north bound TH 25. The existing 6-foot-wide concrete sidewalk on the east side is
proposed to be removed and replaced as part of the turn lane improvements. A modular
block retaining wall will be required on the east side of the sidewalk in order to minimize
the impacts to the drainage swale east of TH 25 in this area.
4.1.9 TH 25 Southbound Turn Lane
Street Design:
The existing B624 concrete curb and gutter along the west side of TH 25 will be replaced
in order to construct the new turn lane. A new pavement section will then be constructed,
including aggregate base class 5 and select granular borrow to match the existing typical
section of this section of TH 25. The width of the street will be increased from 44 feet
wide to 56 feet wide to accommodate the proposed right turn lane at TH 25. The typical
section for this street can be seen on Figure 3, and the proposed surface improvements
are shown on Figures 4 and 5. Additional information regarding the turn lane
justification can be found it Section 4.1.11.
4.1.10 TH 25 & 7th Street Streetscape Improvements
Streetscape improvements have been proposed to establish a gateway into the city. These
improvements utilize specific landscape elements, construction materials and wayfinding
information. Public Works staff were engaged is several discussions related to the
streetscape improvements and they are supportive of the design. The plantings proposed
for this corridor are hardy and salt tolerant materials to improve the ability to withstand
the harsh streetscape environment and road salt application. MnDOT was also engaged
in the discussion and are supportive of the boulevard treatments.
7th Street and East Side TH 25 – 7th Street to 6th Street:
The landscaping on the east side of TH 25 has been developed to create a pedestrian
friendly area while using a variety of plant materials to create a visually interesting
gateway corridor and to separate the cemetery from the public space. The plantings
recommended for this corridor are hardy and salt tolerant materials to improve the ability
to withstand the harsh streetscape environment and road salt application.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 20
The corner of TH 25 and 7th Street will be a stopping area for pedestrians with
wayfinding signage and city identification that are placed on a curved concrete
monument wall and an area for seating. This corner will have a decorative concrete plaza
with unique color/texture and jointing pattern as compared to standard sidewalks. The
sidewalk will be 6 feet wide along 7th Street with a variety of mass plantings between the
fence and back of retaining wall. The sidewalk along TH 25 will be 8 feet wide with a 6-
foot boulevard. The boulevard space will alternate between decorative concrete panels
and landscape planting beds. The retaining wall will vary in distance from the sidewalk
to allow for pockets of landscape plantings and boulevard trees. The area between the
top of the retaining wall and the fence will be densely planted to deter people from
climbing behind the wall. This sidewalk along TH 25 leads to an additional small
decorative concrete plaza with seating and accent plantings at the southeast quadrant of
6th Street and TH 25.
The 8-foot-wide concrete walk will serve as a route for bicyclists connecting to the trail
along 7th Street.
West Side TH 25 – 7th Street to 6th Street:
The landscaping on the west side of TH 25 is very similar to the east side to create a
gateway into the City. The curved concrete monument wall is mirrored from the east side
of TH 25. There are a variety of perennial and ornamental grass plantings that accent the
wall with a small decorative concrete plaza. The boulevard areas also mimic the other
side of TH 25. The existing 6-foot-wide sidewalk is proposed to be removed and
replaced as part of the turn lane improvements. A new 6-foot-wide concrete sidewalk is
proposed to be constructed with trees that mirror the east side of TH 25 to create a
prominent entrance into the city of Monticello.
4.1.11 TH 25 at 7th Street Traffic Summary
The intersection of TH 25 and 7th Street has been identified by the City to have operation
and safe issues. These concerns have been discussed for many years as well as identified
in the City’s 2008 Comprehensive Plan.
In order to review the issues and identified alternative solutions updated traffic count
were conducted in July 2015. Figure 9 in Appendix A shows the current Daily, AM peak
hour and PM peak hour traffic volume at the TH 25 and 7th Street intersection. In
addition the previous 3 years of crash data was also collected and reviewed. Table 4 on
the following page shows a summary of the crash history and Table 5 shows a summary
of the intersection crash rates.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 21
TABLE 4
TH 25 at 7th Street Crash History
201220132014Total
K ‐ Fatal000 0
A ‐ Incapacitating Injury000 0
B ‐ Non‐Incapacitating Injury010 1
C ‐ Possible Injury226 10
N ‐ Property Damage Only131118 42
Total15142453
01 ‐ Rear End91112 32
02 ‐ Sideswipe (Same Direction)202 4
03 ‐ Left Turn003 3
04 ‐ Ran Off Road ‐ Left Side100 1
05 ‐ Right Angle024 6
06 ‐ Right Turn010 1
07 ‐ Ran Off Road ‐ Right Side001 1
08 ‐ Head On201 3
09 ‐ Sideswipe (Opposing Direction)101 2
Total15142453
01 ‐ Collision with Motor Vehicle in Transport141423 51
26 ‐ Collision with Sign Structure or Post101 2
Total15142453
Type
TH 25 and 7th Street (2012 ‐ 2014)
Severity
Diagram
TABLE 5
TH 25 at 7th Street Crash Rate Summary
CalculatedAverage**Critical***CalculatedAverage**
TH 25 and 7th Street (2012 ‐ 2014)5333,0501.46 0.69 0.93 1.80 0.96
Location Number of
Crashes
Daily Entering
Vehicles
Crash Rate*
TH 25 and 7th Street (2012 ‐ 2014)
Severity Rate
Based on the collected traffic volumes and crash history it was determined that the
following improvements should be considered for improving the safety and operations of
the intersection.
Addition of right turn lanes for northbound and southbound TH 25
Addition of right turn lane for westbound 7th Street
Change the left turn phasing to Flashing Yellow Arrows on all approaches
These improvements were analyzed using the Synchro Traffic modeling software. The
analysis compared the current traffic counts with the previous analysis conducted by
MnDOT and evaluated alternatives with and without right turn lanes on TH 25 and with
and without Flashing Yellow Arrow improvements. The results of the analysis can be
found in Table 1 in Appendix A.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 22
The results of the analysis conclude that the addition of the right turn lanes together with
changing the left turn phasing to Flashing Yellow Arrow would provide the best overall
improvement in intersection operations.
4.1.12 Additional Sidewalk and Trail Improvements
Staff evaluated connecting the sidewalk and trail gaps that are currently present within
the project area that would benefit both the residents and businesses within the project
area. These connections also provide continuity to the overall sidewalk and trail corridors
within the core area of the City that then extend to regional system connections. The
City’s adopted Park and Trail plan includes a policy statement supporting increased
connectivity in the pathway and sidewalk system. Construction of sidewalk/trail facilities
along both sides of relatively higher-traffic roadways and collector roadways should be
considered in order to limit pedestrian and bicycle crossings and improve safety.
The proposed concrete sidewalk and bituminous trail improvements are on Figure 10.
No new sidewalk is proposed to be installed along the majority of the streets within Area
5 as property owners have not petitioned for this and the streets are wide enough to
provide for on-street pedestrian use. Staff met with School District representatives and
they did not indicate there was a significant need for sidewalk along these corridors as
well.
The following describes the potential sidewalk and trail improvements:
Cedar Street Sidewalk:
Construction of a 6-foot-wide concrete sidewalk was evaluated along the east side of
Cedar Street between Broadway Street and 4th Street and on the west side of Cedar Street
between 7th Street and 4th Street. The City’s transportation plan identifies a future signal
at 4th Street and this sidewalk would funnel pedestrian traffic to 4th Street and TH 25 and
the create connections with existing sidewalks. The construction of the sidewalk would
impact some existing trees that are located within City rights-of-way.
Construction of sidewalk/trail facilities along relatively higher traffic roadways and
collector roadways should be considered in order to limit pedestrian and bicycle crossings
and improve safety.
Washington Street:
A 10-foot-wide bituminous trail is being proposed along the west side of Washington
Street as this roadway will have an increase in traffic volume with the Fallon Avenue
overpass and will provide a connection to the existing trail along 7th Street with the future
roundabout at 7th Street and Washington Street
7th Street (TH 25 to Cedar Street):
A new 6-foot-wide concrete sidewalk is proposed to be constructed along the south side
of 7th Street between TH 25 and Cedar Street to direct users to and from the trail along 7th
Street and the proposed sidewalk along Cedar Street to 4th Street.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 23
7th Street (North Side – Cedar Street to Ramsey Street):
A 1½-inch overlay is proposed for the existing trail along the north side of 7th Street. Ped
ramps will be replaced in order to make them ADA compliant. This work is proposed to
be completed in 2017.
Broadway Street Sidewalk Improvements:
Approximately 20% of the existing sidewalk on the south side of Broadway between TH
25 and Washington Street is proposed to be replaced as part of this project. This would
include replacing damaged and settled panels and replacing all pedestrian curb ramps in
order to make it ADA compliant.
Railroad Corridor Trail Improvements:
Construction of a bituminous trail along the south side of the railroad corridor between
TH 25 and Washington Street was evaluated as a continuation of the existing trail west of
TH 25 and would provide an additional connection to the proposed trail and sidewalk
connections along Washington Street and Cedar Street.
4.1.13 Other Considerations
Signs:
All signs will be replaced within Area 5 with new signs meeting retro reflectivity
standards. Current stop sign locations are proposed to remain with no revisions to
intersection controls.
On-street Parking:
Currently there are no restrictions to on-street parking within Area 5. No revisions are
proposed.
Street Lighting:
Existing street lighting appears to be adequate within Area 5 and is consistent with the
City’s street lighting policy. Xcel Energy owns and maintains the lighting, so any
modifications would be completed by Xcel.
4th Street Park Parking Lot Improvements:
The parking lot off of 4th Street is proposed to be chip sealed as part of this project due to
its existing condition and staff recommendation.
Trees:
Boulevard trees will be planted within Area 5 where gaps exist along the street corridors.
Wetlands:
No wetlands are located within the project area.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 24
Wellhead Protection:
The project area is within the Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) with
the project area north of 4th Street having low vulnerability and the areas south of 4th
Street having moderate vulnerability. The main concern for groundwater contamination
sources in the moderate vulnerability areas during construction would come from solid
waste management, leaking pipelines, spills and preparation for fuels, which is
anticipated to not likely occur.
BNSF Railroad:
Crossing improvement costs have been included in the project costs. Staff will be
contacting BNSF to coordinate permitting for this work. With past projects, the City has
been responsible for costs to improve the street and sidewalk crossings when completing
an improvement project.
4.1.14 Geotechnical Recommendations
The Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review is included in Appendix D. The
report recommends excavating any organic soils within 3 feet of any pavement subgrade.
This project includes reconstructing local access roadways that have been in service for
well over 30 years and while the roadway pavements have failed their failure seems to be
caused more from age than poor subgrade conditions. Excavating subgrade soils and
replacing them with select granular borrow increases project costs significantly. Staff is
therefore proposing to follow AET’s recommendation for the purposes of providing a
cost in this Feasibility Report. However, should it become apparent during construction
that the existing subgrade soils are adequate for construction we will limit subcut depths
to 1-foot below the bottom of the aggregate base whenever practical, which is what was
done during previous reconstruction projects which are holding up well.
4.2 Stormwater Treatment
Area 5 involves reconstructing existing urban streets with existing storm sewer systems. Unlike
new developments, which would provide stormwater catch basins, pipes and stormwater ponds
to provide flood control and water treatment, reconstruction projects require a more creative
approach for stormwater management. It is the City’s practice that reconstruction projects
incorporate stormwater treatment systems where feasible. In the past, water quality has been
provided by grading new ponds or expanding existing ponds, by grading drainage swales, and by
installing sump manholes or “stormceptor” manholes.
The current management of stormwater in this section of the City utilizes storm sewer to route
and discharge stormwater runoff directly into the Mississippi River. Flooding or ponding of
surface water due to rainfall events are not significantly problematic in this area. This project as
proposed will not result in a small new net increase in impervious surface area.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 25
This project will trigger the threshold to obtain a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)
Construction General Permit (CGP). This project will require the development of a Stormwater
Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) that will require the integration of permanent
stormwater management for the increase in impervious that is 1 acre or greater. The SWPPP also
requires the development of controls to prevent erosion, construction waste management, and
hazardous materials management.
The permanent stormwater management for the increase in impervious of 1 acre or greater is to
provide a water quality volume of one inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces. For this
project there is limited space to provide permanent stormwater management. The MPCA CGP
states, “For work on linear projects with lack of right‐of‐way where the Permittee(s) cannot
obtain an easement or other permission for property needed to install treatment systems capable
of treating the entire water quality volume on site, the Permittee(s) must maximize the water
quality volume that can be treated prior to discharge to surface waters. Treatment can be
provided through other methods or combination of methods such as grassed swales, filtration
systems, smaller ponds, or grit chambers, prior to discharge to surface waters. A reasonable
attempt must be made to obtain right‐of‐way during the project planning process. Documentation
of these attempts must be in the SWPPP per Part III.A.5.m. in the section addressing
infeasibility.”
The goal will be to provide permanent stormwater management to the maximum extent practical
given the right-of-way constraints. For other areas the City will need to consider the installation
of sump manholes to minimize their off-site impacts and as a part of the City of Monticello’s
Municipal Separate Stormwater Sewer System.
4.3 Water Main Improvements
The existing water main in Area 5 was tested for leaks in 2010. Based on the results of the leak
detection tests, as well as on recent visual observations, staff is proposing to leave the existing
water main in place unless it is identified for replacement for other reasons during the project
with the exception of the existing 6-inch water main along Ramsey Street between Broadway
and 4th Street. This segment is proposed to be replaced with 12-inch DIP in order to complete
the 12-inch loop between Broadway and 7th Street. As was previously noted, valves, hydrants
and leaking service lines will be replaced with this project. The location of all proposed repairs
and/or replacements is shown in the plans in on Figures 11 and 12 of Appendix A.
The 16-inch DIP along Cedar Street is proposed to be extended through the project in order to
feed to the future water treatment plant south of I-94 adjacent to the reservoir site at 203 Chelsea
Road. The proposed 16-inch line is shown on Figures 11 and 12 of Appendix A.
Additional improvements are proposed to connect the piping from pump house #1 to the 10-inch
DIP coming from pump house #2 which will ultimately feed water to the future water treatment
plant. This will require the feed from the pump house to the north to be abandoned and rerouted
to exit the pump house on the east side of the building.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 26
4.4 Sanitary Sewer Improvements
The existing sanitary sewer in Area 5 was televised in 2015. After reviewing all available
televising tapes staff is recommending that the sanitary sewer trunk lines along 4th Street
between Palm Street and Washington Street, and New Street from 4th Street to 3rd Street be
replaced. This is due to the presence of cracks, substantial sags in the sewer line, root intrusion,
and leaking joints. These pipe sections will be replaced with polyvinyl chloride pipe (PVC)
pipe. In addition, all of the sanitary service lines, between the mainline and the property line,
will likely need to be replaced due to widespread root intrusion. It is proposed to slip-line other
segments along 3rd Street, New Street, Wright Street, and Ramsey Street that have significant
infiltration and root intrusion.
Staff has met with TDS to discuss the proposed utility improvements in the project area. TDS
has large fiber optic conduits and vaults extending within the roadway along 3rd Street and Cedar
Street. The running line of the fiber optic conduit along 3rd Street is approximately 5 to 7 feet off
of the sanitary sewer main. This would make the removal and replacement of the sanitary sewer
main along this section very difficult and would likely increase the cost. It would also be very
costly for TDS to move their facilities in this area. Because of this, TDS has agreed in principal
to paying for the price difference between open cutting and replacing the sewer and lining the
sanitary sewer main. The final amount would be agreed upon once bids are received and is
estimated to be $25,000.
Some manhole castings and adjustment rings have exhibited cracking and spalling and will be
replaced as necessary. Manhole casting lids with open pick holes will be removed and replaced
with sealed solid lids with concealed pick holes. This will reduce the volume of stormwater
inflow into the sanitary sewer system which will serve to lower the volume of clean water to be
treated at the wastewater treatment plant thereby reducing wastewater treatment costs at the
plant.
The locations of the proposed repairs or replacements are shown in the plans in on Figures 11
and 12 of Appendix A.
4.5 Construction Methods
Existing pavements will be reconstructed by reclaiming the existing bituminous surface and any
class 5 aggregate base. The existing subgrade will then be farmed and compacted to provide a
stable base for the pavement section. However, if during construction it is noticed that the
subgrade soils are not deemed to be stable enough for construction purposes they will either be
farmed to dry the soil, if time allows, or they will be removed and replaced with a 1- to 2-foot
section of compacted select granular borrow as directed by the engineer.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 27
During utilities construction, manhole and catch basin castings will be removed and the
structures will be covered to prevent materials from dropping into these facilities. Paving will be
completed in two separate lifts upon acceptance of the grading of the aggregate base. It is
anticipated that the final lift of the bituminous wear course could be placed on some of the streets
in the fall of the same year, as long as the weather cooperates, and where there are no utilities
installed under the street. On streets that had deep utilities installed under them, the wear course
will be left off until the following year to allow the soils under the street enough time to settle.
During construction the contractor will be required to phase their operations to smaller areas of
the overall project to minimize areas of disruption. This would serve to minimize the level of
traffic control needed on the project and minimize disturbances to properties. For example, we
would specify that 3rd and 4th Streets not be under utility construction at the same time and that
one of the streets needs to be accessible at all times.
Washington Street improvements would occur in the summer when school is not in session.
The contractor will also be required to start their construction operations at TH 25 and 7th Street
after July 11 to prevent overlapping work with the improvements at TH 25 and CSAH 75. We
are not anticipating that this would result in substantial delays or a significant increase to the
project cost.
It is possible to construct the proposed retaining wall along 7th Street this winter. Doing so may
reduce the cost of the construction due to the elimination of the required sheet piling. Another
option would be to delay the construction of the retaining wall until the following winter
(2016/2017). If staff elects to do this, it is recommended that the all of the turn lane work at TH
25 and 7th Street be delayed until 2017.
4.6 Private Utilities
Staff has obtained utility maps from telephone, gas, and cable companies regarding this project.
If the City Council approves the preparation of plans and specifications, staff will meet with the
private utility companies to discuss the proposed improvements. The alignment of streets,
sidewalks and pathways were considered to minimize impacts to private utilities. It is
anticipated that a few of the power poles will need to be relocated.
Should some of the utility companies indicate that they want to upsize or modify their services
during this project those upgrades and replacements of private utilities will be at the discretion
and cost of the individual utility.
Staff has met with TDS to discuss the proposed utility improvements in the project area. TDS
has large fiber optic conduits and vaults running in the roadway along 3rd Street and Cedar
Street. The running line of the fiber optic conduit along 3rd Street is approximately 5 to 7 feet off
of the sanitary sewer main running along 3rd Street. This would make the removal and
replacement of the sanitary sewer main along this section very difficult and would likely increase
the cost. It would also be very costly for TDS to move their facilities in this area. Because of
this, TDS has agreed in principal to paying for the price difference between open cutting and
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 28
replacing the sewer and lining the sanitary sewer main. The final amount would be agreed upon
once bids are received. This dollar amount is estimated to be $25,000.
4.7 Permits
Permits required as part of the proposed improvements are anticipated as follows:
MPCA General Stormwater Permit (NPDES) ..... Grading and Storm Water
Wright County ........................................................ Roadway Right-of-Way
MnDOT ................................................................... Roadway Right-of-Way
4.8 Right-of-Way/Easements
It is anticipated that all improvements will occur within existing City right-of-way. There are no
existing drainage and utility easements in this area of the City. It is not anticipated that the City
will need to acquire any additional right-of-way or easements for this project.
Rights of entry from individual property owners may need to be obtained prior to construction
commencing for grading, utility construction, and restoration.
The potential costs for any other easements have not been included in this feasibility report.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 29
5. FINANCING
5.1 Opinion of Cost
A detailed opinion of probable cost for the proposed improvements can be found in Appendix B
of this report. These opinions of probable cost incorporate anticipated 2016 construction costs
and include a 10% construction contingency and 22% indirect costs with the exception of the
sidewalk and trail work. The construction contingency for those schedules is set at 30%. The
indirect costs include legal, engineering, administrative, and financing items. Summary tables of
the proposed project costs for Area 5, 7th Street, TH 25/7th Street Intersection, and Future
Proposed Improvements are shown below in Tables 6-10. The total project cost for all project
areas and options is $7,694,105.93.
TABLE 6
Proposed Project Costs
2016 Street Reconstruction Project
Area 5
SCHEDULE TOTAL
Schedule A – Surface Improvements $2,711,830
Schedule B – Sanitary Sewer Improvements $1,161,350
Schedule C – Water Main Improvements $915,890
Schedule D – Drainage Improvements $223,060
Schedule S – Pump House Improvements $98,500
TOTAL PROJECT COST - AREA 5 $5,110,630
TABLE 7
Proposed Project Costs
2016 Street Reconstruction Project
7th Street (TH 25 to Cedar Street)
SCHEDULE TOTAL
Schedule F – Surface Improvements $141,240
Schedule Q – Sidewalk Improvements (S. Side) $26,140
TOTAL PROJECT COST – 7th Street (TH 25 to Cedar St.) $167,380
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 30
TABLE 8
Proposed Project Costs
2016 Street Reconstruction Project
TH 25/7th Street Turn Lane and Signal Improvements
SCHEDULE TOTAL
Schedule G – 7th Street Right Turn Lane Improvements $843,230
Schedule H – Northbound TH 25 at 7th St Right Turn Lane
Improvements $275,340
Schedule I – Southbound TH 25 at 7th St Right Turn Lane
Improvements $213,280
Schedule J – TH 25 and 7th Landscape Improvements $48,100
Schedule K – East side TH 25 Sidewalk Improvements
(between 7th St and 6th St) $216,180
TOTAL PROJECT COST – TURN LANE AND SIGNAL
IMPROVEMENTS $1,596,130
TABLE 9
Proposed Project Costs
2016 Street Reconstruction Project
Additional Sidewalk/Trail and Parking Improvements
SCHEDULE TOTAL
Schedule L – Broadway St Sidewalk Improvements $55,190
Schedule M – 4th Street Parking Lot Improvements $4,600
Schedule N – Cedar Street Sidewalk Improvements (4th Street
to 7th Street) $96,560
Schedule O – Cedar Street Sidewalk Improvements (4th Street
to Broadway Street) $66,390
Schedule P – Washington Street Trail Improvements $111,510
TOTAL PROJECT COST – ADDITIONAL PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS $334,250
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 31
TABLE 10
Proposed Project Costs
2016 Street Reconstruction Project
Future Improvements
SCHEDULE TOTAL
Schedule E – Cedar Street (South of 7th Street) $119,404
Schedule F – 7th Street (Cedar Street to Ramsey Street) $150,475
Schedule R – 7th Street Trail Improvements $95,033
TOTAL PROJECT COST – FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS $364,912
5.2 Funding
5.2.1 Assessments
A portion of the project costs is proposed to be recovered through assessments levied
against benefitting properties in the project area. Assessments are proposed to be
collected for surface improvements against residential lots and non-residential uses in
Area 5 and 7th Street East between TH 25 and Cedar Street. These assessments are
described below, and a summary is shown below in Tables 11 and 12.
Residential Assessments
The residential assessment is a per lot assessment for the general improvement work to
the roadways within the project area. In general, any residential property with access to a
street being improved is proposed to be assessed as one residential unit. To be consistent
with previous assessment policies and past Council actions, corner lots and existing
residential properties with more than one access to one or more streets are proposed to be
assessed one residential unit. Single family residential properties with multiple
driveways are proposed to be assessed one residential unit.
Assessments are based on the City’s standard residential assessment rate for previously
completed street reconstruction projects with an approximate annual increase of 12.5%.
This results in a proposed rate of $4,500 per residential unit for 2016 (the rate in 2011
was $4,000 per unit).
Assessments for duplexes and triplexes are proposed to be assessed for each individual
dwelling unit within the complex.
Furthermore, any existing single family parcel that is large enough to subdivide will be
assessed for the additional unit at the time that the parcel is actually subdivided.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 32
As has been the case in the past, assessments will be applied based on the current use of
the property at the time the improvements are made. However, if the use of the property
changes in the future, the assessment would be re-evaluated at the time based on a 30-
year pavement life, not including additional interest costs.
Multi-family (4 units and greater) and Non-residential Assessments
There are several multi-family and non-residential properties in Area 5, and there are 3
non-residential properties along 7th Street between TH 25 and Cedar Street. Multi-family
and non-residential lots are proposed to be assessed for street reconstruction at a rate of
$100 per front foot for Area 5 and for 7th Street (between TH 25 and Cedar Street), with
an additional $13.50 per front foot added for sidewalk assessments when appropriate.
This rate is based on assessing 100% of the average per foot cost for the project area,
which is consistent with past practice. Per our previous assessment policy, these non-
residential rates are applied to 100% of the front footage of the properties, 50% of the
side footage as long as the property has direct access to the reconstructed street, and 25%
of the side street if the property does not have direct access. However, if a direct access
is added at a later date the property would pay the additional 25% at that time.
Previous assessments for properties assessed with the CSAH 75 improvement project
were taken into consideration with the preliminary project assessments based on the
above methodology.
The proposed pathway along Washington Street is not proposed to be assessed to the
adjacent properties as this poses a regional benefit for City’s pathway system.
These rates are based on the City’s standard multi-family and non-residential rates for
previously completed street reconstruction projects. However, there are several non-
residential properties throughout the project that staff would recommend be assessed as
follows:
The American Inn Motel (118 7th Street) shares a driveway with Taco Bell (124
7th Street), but does not have frontage on 7th Street. It is proposed to calculate the
total assessment for these two properties by the frontage the Taco Bell property
has on 7th Street, and then spread the assessment to each property based on their
acreage.
St. Peter’s Church (413, 419 3rd Street) occupies two parcels, one of which
includes the pastor’s parsonage. It is proposed to calculate the total assessment
for these two parcels using a combination of the residential unit assessment for
the parsonage using a lot size of 130 feet by 80 feet and the remaining by front
foot using the non-residential assessment rate.
It should be noted that there are several properties in Area 5 that were previously
assessed for their frontage along East Broadway for improvements completed under City
Project No. 98C017. The proposed assessments for these properties are shown in the
attached assessment rolls, but their assessments will be reviewed in more detail prior to
the Public Hearing on January 11, 2016.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 33
Should Council choose to construct any sidewalks in the grid area, the City’s policy
includes benefitting property owners paying for 25% of the sidewalk construction, with
the City paying the remaining 75% of the costs. Staff discussed that residential
assessments for sidewalk along Cedar Street be waived since it fills in sidewalk gaps and
enhances the core sidewalk grid system serving a larger area of the City.
City Property Assessments
The City currently owns three properties, which include; Hillside Cemetery, the DMV
and adjacent parking lots, and the 4th Street Park, that are included in the assessment
calculations including the cemetery parcels on Cedar Street. The assessment for these
properties totals $92,414.50 and is included in the non-residential assessment total noted
in Table 11.
The preliminary assessment roll and accompanying map are included in Appendix C.
TABLE 11
Preliminary Assessments
Area 5
TYPICAL ASSESSMENT RATE NO. OF
LOTS LIN. FT TOTAL
Single Family Residential
Assessment $4,500/Lot 120 $540,000
Multi-Family & Non-
Residential Assessment $100/FF 6,843.81 $684,381*
TOTAL $1,224,381
* Includes City owned properties totaling $92,414.50.
TABLE 12
Preliminary Assessments
7th Street (TH 25 to Cedar Street)
TYPICAL ASSESSMENT RATE LIN. FT TOTAL
Non-Residential Assessment $100/FF 379.37 $37,937.00
Non-Residential Sidewalk Assessment $13.50/FF 379.37 $5,121.50
TOTAL $43,058.50
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 34
5.2.2 City Contribution
This project is proposed to be funded using street reconstruction bonds, capital
improvement funds, utility enterprise funds and future bond issue, advancement of state
aid funds, MnDOT local initiative funds and assessments to benefitting properties. If the
7th Street retaining wall is constructed this winter, the construction costs would not be
eligible for State Aid funding given the timing for MnDOT review and plan approval.
However, since the City must advance fund State Aid funds it is worth the costs savings
to construct the wall this winter, not utilizing State Aid funds that can be used for other
components of the project.
A summary of the proposed funding is presented below in Table 13 and 14. Please note
that the table assumes a 1-year construction schedule. A description of other City funds
is as follows:
State Aid Funds:
Available State Aid funds could be utilized for 7th Street from TH 25 to Cedar Street,
Cedar Street between 7th and 4th Street, 4th Street between TH 25 and Cedar Street,
Washington Street between East Broadway and the railroad tracks, and the intersection
improvements at TH 25 and 7th Street. Each year the City designates 20% of our streets
as Municipal State Aid Streets that are then eligible for State Aid funding. The current
balance in our State Aid account is approximately $100,000. In order to use any State
Aid funds, the City would have to request an advance of future funds. The City can
advance up to 5 times their annual construction allotment, which currently totals
$380,000 annually. Therefore, the City can request advancing funds for approximately
$1,800,000. A City Council resolution requesting advancement of funds will need to be
adopted by the Council. Advancement of funds means that the City can request the funds
as the monies are expended for engineering fees and construction costs and those dollars
are subtracted from future annual State Aid allocations. Therefore, it the City advances
the full $1,800,000, subsequent State Aid allocations for the next 5 years would not be
made. There is slight positive adjustment to the City’s needs determination with
advancing funds in order to encourage City’s to draw down their funds.
MnDOT Local Initiative Funds: MnDOT provides funds for locally (City) initiated
projects that provide benefit the trunk highway systems. The program has approximately
$1 million dollars of funding annually. Projects approved for funding are approved on a
project by project basis if funds are available. Initial discussions with MnDOT staff
indicate they would be supportive of funding a share of the right turn lane, sidewalk and
signal improvements along TH 25 at 7th Street. A formal request for funds has been
submitted to MnDOT and staff is awaiting their response. Funds could be available as
early as July 1, 2016.
MnDOT Community Roadside Landscape Partnership Program:
MnDOT awards funds annually to cities that propose to complete landscaping work
located on state trunk highway rights-of-way. MnDOT district trunk highway funds are
provided on approved projects to cover the cost of planting materials such as trees,
shrubs, perennials, grasses, mulch, etc. If awarded, this would be used to supplement the
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 35
costs of the landscaping materials along TH 25. MnDOT District 3 typically awards
approximately $5,000 per project for plant materials. MnDOT will also provide design
assistance and possible contract administration for the landscaping work if requested by
the City. After the project public hearing, staff will request Council to consider this
request for design assistance and funding from MnDOT.
TABLE 13
Proposed Project Funding
Area 5
ASSESSMENTS*
CITY
FUNDS TOTAL
STATE AID
ELIGIBLE
Street $1,224,381 $1,487,449 $2,711,830 $663,300
Sanitary
Sewer - $1,161,350 $1,161,350 -
Water main - $915,890 $915,890 -
Storm Sewer - $223,060 $223,060 $17,850
Pump House $98,500 $98,500
TOTAL $1,224,381 $3,886,249 $5,110,630 $681,150
*$92,414.50 is for City-Owned Property
TABLE 14
Proposed Project Funding
TH 25/7th Street Turn Lanes and Signal Improvements
ASSESSMENTS
CITY
FUNDS TOTAL
STATE AID
ELIGIBLE AND
MNDOT LOCAL
INITIATIVE
FUNDS
7th Street
Recon(TH 25
to Cedar
Street)
$43,058.50 $124,321.50 $167,380 $167,380
Turn Lanes
and Signal
Improvements
$0 $1,596,130 $1,596,130 $1,548,040
TOTAL $43,058.50 $1,720,451.50$1,763,510 $1,715,420
This funding does not include the additional proposed trail, sidewalk, and parking lot
improvements within Area 5 or the proposed future projects for 2017. If the sidewalk
along Cedar Street is constructed, an additional $11,149.92 would be collected in
assessments from benefitting non-residential properties.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 36
6. PROJECT SCHEDULE
The proposed schedule is as follows:
Council Orders Feasibility Report ........................................................................ June 22, 2015
Neighborhood Meeting .................................................................................. December 2, 2015
Council Accepts Feasibility Report and Orders Public Hearing ................. December 14, 2015
Council Conducts Public Hearing/Authorizes Plans and Specifications ......... January 11, 2016
Private Utility Coordination Meeting .................................................................. February 2016
Submit Final Plans to State Aid ........................................................................... March 2, 2016
Council Approves Plans and Specifications/Authorizes Ad for Bids ................ March 28, 2016
Receive Bids ....................................................................................................... April 28, 2016
Award Contract ...................................................................................................... May 9, 2016
Begin Construction .................................................................................................... June 2016
Construction Complete ......................................................................................... October 2016
Assessment Hearing ......................................................................................... October 24, 2016
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100 Page 37
7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
City Project No. 15C001 consists of reconstructing streets, constructing new sidewalk/pathway,
storm sewer improvements, sanitary sewer and water main improvements, and appurtenant work
for the Area 5 per the Overall Street Reconstruction Program and well as improvements to the
intersection at TH 25 and 7th Street.
It is the recommendation of City staff that City Project No. 15C001 is feasible, necessary, and
cost-effective from an engineering standpoint. The Council should consider the following items
as it relates to the project:
1. Reconstruct all streets and utilities within Area 5 and 7th Street between TH 25 and Cedar
Street as identified herein.
2. Increase the standard residential street reconstruction assessment rate to $4,500 per unit
for 2016.
3. Accept the standard multi-family and non-residential street reconstruction assessment
rate at $100 per front foot, and the standard sidewalk construction assessment rate at
$13.50 per front foot for 2016.
4. Complete the intersection improvements at TH 25 and 7th Street.
5. Complete the following sidewalk and trail improvements:
7th St sidewalk Connection (south side between TH 25 and Cedar St)
Cedar St sidewalk connection (east and west side between 7th St and CSAH 75)
Washington St Trail (west side between R/R and CSAH 75)
CSAH 75 sidewalk replacement (between Cedar Street and Washington Street) to
include:
o Panel replacement totaling approximately 20% of the entire length
o Pedestrian ramp improvements
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100
APPENDIX A
Figure 1 – Project Scope
Figure 2 – Typical Sections, Area 5
Figure 3 – Typical Sections, 7th Street and TH 25
Figure 4 – Surface Improvements, Area 5, 7th Street and TH 25
Figure 5 – Surface Improvements, 7th Street and TH 25 Intersection
Figure 6 – TH 25 & 7th Street Gateway Design Preliminary Masterplan
Figure 7 – TH 25 & 7th Street Gateway Design Preliminary Masterplan
Enlargement
Figure 8 – TH 25 & 7th Street Gateway Design Elements
Figure 9 – TH 25 & 7th Street Turning Movements
Table 1 – TH 25 & 7th Street Analysis Summary
Figure 10 – Potential Sidewalk and Trail Improvements
Figure 11 – Utility Improvements, Area 5 (1 of 2)
Figure 12 – Utility Improvements, Area 5 (2 of 2)
TH 25
7th St E
E Broadway StWalnut St
E River St
Wright St
Benton St
Ramsey St4th St E
3rd St E
Palm St
Fallon Ave
Locust St
Henipin St Dayton St
Washington StWright St
Cedar St
!"b$
?¾A@
)x
TH25/7th Street Proposed Intersection Improvements
Docum
ent Path: K:\02596-100\GIS\Maps\StReconProjectLocation.m
xd
Ü
0 500 Feet
Proposed 2016 Street ReconstructionMonticello, MN
Railroad
Reconstruction Streets
Fi
g
u
r
e
N
u
m
b
e
r
WS
B
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
N
o
.
0
2
5
9
6
-
1
0
0
701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300Minneapolis, MN 554162016 STR
E
E
T
R
E
C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
I
N
G
&
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
,
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
Se
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
3
,
2
0
1
5
Ci
t
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
N
o
.
1
5
C
0
0
1
2
UT
I
L
I
T
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
K:\02596-100\Cad\Exhibits\TYP SEC.dwg
Fi
g
u
r
e
N
u
m
b
e
r
WS
B
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
N
o
.
0
2
5
9
6
-
1
0
0
701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300Minneapolis, MN 554162016 STR
E
E
T
R
E
C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
I
N
G
&
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
,
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
Se
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
3
,
2
0
1
5
Ci
t
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
N
o
.
1
5
C
0
0
1
3
UT
I
L
I
T
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
K:\02596-100\Cad\Exhibits\TYP SEC.dwg
5
WS
B
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
N
u
m
b
e
r
:
02
5
9
6
-
1
0
0
Da
t
e
:
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
,
2
0
1
5
TH
2
5
&
7
t
h
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
Preliminary Masterplan
7th
S
t
E
TH
25
TH
25
Se
a
t
i
n
g
Sm
a
l
l
O
r
n
a
m
e
n
t
a
l
Tr
e
e
s
11
’
E
d
g
e
o
f
Si
d
e
w
a
l
k
t
o
Fe
n
c
e
12
’
B
a
c
k
o
f
Wa
l
l
t
o
F
e
n
c
e
6’
B
a
c
k
o
f
Wa
l
l
t
o
F
e
n
c
e
Re
l
o
c
a
t
e
Si
g
n
a
l
C
a
b
i
n
e
t
3’ Back of Wall to Fence
Sh
a
d
e
T
r
e
e
Ma
s
s
P
l
a
n
t
i
n
g
s
;
Va
r
i
e
t
y
o
f
S
h
r
u
b
s
an
d
O
r
n
a
m
e
n
t
a
l
Pe
r
e
n
n
i
a
l
s
St
a
m
p
e
d
C
o
l
o
r
Co
n
c
r
e
t
e
Pu
r
p
l
e
Fo
u
n
t
a
i
n
G
r
a
s
s
St
e
l
l
a
D
e
O
r
o
Da
y
L
i
l
y
Se
a
t
i
n
g
De
c
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
Co
n
c
r
e
t
e
P
l
a
z
a
Re
f
e
r
t
o
En
l
a
r
g
e
m
e
n
t
De
c
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
Co
n
c
r
e
t
e
P
l
a
z
a
a
a’
14
’
18
’
11
’
13
’
Seating9C[ſPFKPISignsCity ID Sign 6.5’ - 7.5’ High Retaining Wall Concrete Monument at Corners
a-
a
’
F
r
o
n
t
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
TH
2
5
4’Boulevard Planting2’Stamped Colored Concrete 8’Sidewalk4’Turf
8’
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
6’
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
6’
P
l
a
n
t
i
n
g
/
pa
v
e
d
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
6’
P
l
a
n
t
i
n
g
/
pa
v
e
d
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Li
g
h
t
P
o
l
e
s
6’
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
N SCALE: 1” = 30’0’30’60’
3.
5
’
-
4
.
0
’
Re
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
W
a
l
l
6.
5
’
-
7
.
5
’
Re
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
W
a
l
l
1.
5
’
-
2
.
0
’
Re
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
W
a
l
l
TH
2
5
&
7
t
h
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
Pr
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
M
a
s
t
e
r
p
l
a
n
E
n
l
a
r
g
e
m
e
n
t
WS
B
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
N
u
m
b
e
r
:
02
5
9
6
-
1
0
0
Da
t
e
:
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
,
2
0
1
5
Decorative 13’ Wide Pedestrian Crosswalks bb’
8’
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
6’
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
2’
S
t
a
m
p
e
d
Co
n
c
r
e
t
e
R
i
b
b
o
n
4’
P
e
r
e
n
n
i
a
l
/
Or
n
a
m
e
n
t
a
l
Gr
a
s
s
e
s
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
2’
S
t
a
m
p
e
d
Co
n
c
r
e
t
e
R
i
b
b
o
n
Cu
s
t
o
m
C
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
Mo
n
u
m
e
n
t
a
t
C
o
r
n
e
r
s
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
S
i
g
n
a
l
Po
l
e
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
Me
d
i
a
n
4’
P
e
r
e
n
n
i
a
l
/
O
r
n
a
m
e
n
t
a
l
Gr
a
s
s
e
s
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
6’ Sidewalk Modular Block Wall
18
’
Th
r
u
L
a
n
e
5’
Bl
v
d
14
’
Ri
g
h
t
T
u
r
n
La
n
e
6’
Si
d
e
w
a
l
k
2’
Wa
l
l
2-
5
’
Pl
a
n
t
i
n
g
6’
Si
d
e
w
a
l
k
13
’
Le
f
t
T
u
r
n
La
n
e
11
’
Th
r
u
L
a
n
e
b-
b
’
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
7t
h
s
t
Small Ornamental Trees
Sm
a
l
l
O
r
n
a
m
e
n
t
a
l
Tr
e
e
s
We
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
6T
C
H
ſ
E
Ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
6T
C
H
ſ
E
Mass Plantings;Variety of Shrubs and Ornamental Perennials
Ma
s
s
P
l
a
n
t
i
n
g
s
;
Pe
r
e
n
n
i
a
l
/
Or
n
a
m
e
n
t
a
l
G
r
a
s
s
e
s
Shade Tree N SCALE: 1” = 10’0’10’20’12’ Back of Wall to Fence 5’ Back of Wall to Fence 7th St E
TH
25
14’18’11’13’
TH
2
5
&
7
t
h
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
Elements Karl Foerster
Dw
a
r
f
B
u
s
h
Ho
n
e
y
s
u
c
k
l
e
WS
B
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
N
u
m
b
e
r
:
02
5
9
6
-
1
0
0
Da
t
e
:
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
,
2
0
1
5
Au
t
u
m
n
B
r
i
l
l
i
a
n
c
e
Se
r
v
i
c
e
b
e
r
r
y
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
S
a
l
t
T
o
l
e
r
a
n
t
P
l
a
n
t
s
:
Sh
a
d
e
T
r
e
e
s
:
-
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
L
i
n
d
e
n
-
I
r
o
n
w
o
o
d
-
H
o
n
e
y
l
o
c
u
s
t
-
S
p
r
u
c
e
-
P
i
n
e
Am
e
r
i
c
a
n
L
i
n
d
e
n
Obedient Plant
He
l
e
n
i
u
m
No
r
t
h
e
a
s
t
P
e
r
s
p
e
c
t
i
v
e
No
r
t
h
w
e
s
t
P
e
r
s
p
e
c
t
i
v
e
Au
t
u
m
n
J
o
y
S
e
d
u
m
St
e
l
l
a
D
e
O
r
o
D
a
y
l
i
l
y
Purple Fountain Grass
Or
n
a
m
e
n
t
a
l
T
r
e
e
s
:
-
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
b
e
r
r
y
-
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
P
l
u
m
-
T
r
e
e
L
i
l
a
c
Sh
r
u
b
s
:
-
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
-
B
a
r
b
e
r
r
y
-
C
o
t
o
n
e
a
s
t
e
r
-
A
l
p
i
n
e
C
u
r
r
a
n
t
-
C
o
m
m
o
n
L
i
l
a
c
-
F
o
r
s
y
t
h
i
a
-
D
w
a
r
f
B
u
s
h
H
o
n
e
y
s
u
c
k
l
e
Pe
r
e
n
n
i
a
l
s
/
O
r
n
a
m
e
n
t
a
l
Gr
a
s
s
e
s
:
-
S
e
d
u
m
-
D
a
y
l
i
l
y
-
H
e
l
e
n
i
u
m
-
O
b
e
d
i
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
t
-
F
o
u
n
t
a
i
n
G
r
a
s
s
-
K
a
r
l
F
o
e
r
s
t
e
r
G
r
a
s
s
Figure 9
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
AM
& PM Peak Hour
Tu
r
n
i
n
g
Movements
LE
G
E
N
D
50
(7
5
)
AM
(
P
M
)
T
u
r
n
i
n
g
Mo
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
(
J
u
l
y
1
5
,
2
0
1
5
)
24
8
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
2
0
1
5
L
a
n
e
Ge
o
m
e
t
r
y
7,
3
0
0
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
2
0
1
5
A
A
D
T
s
Si
g
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
N
61 (72)
980 (930)
41 (62)
0 (0)
55
(
1
4
3
)
41
(
8
1
)
j
ur
w
]
"
58
(
8
6
)
s
0
(
0
)
>=
2
4
7
81
(
1
7
0
)
,
14
8
(
2
0
5
)
0
(
0
)
x
0 (0)
84 (240)
608 (1219)
114 (161)
35
(
7
1
)
v
Table 1
TH 25 at 7th Street Analysis Summary
Approach Left Thru Right Approach Left Thru Right Approach Left Thru Right Approach Left Thru Right
MnDOT Analysis C / 26.6 D / 44.6 F / 140.5 D / 42.4 A / 8.1 E / 63.8 E / 76.3 E / 55.2 C / 20.1 D / 54.9 B / 14.8 B / 11.7 E / 58.3 A / 8.4
July Counts C / 32.9 C / 24.5 E / 66.0 D / 38.7 A / 7.3 D / 50.0 D / 52.4 D / 48.6 C / 28.8 D / 49.3 C / 25.4 D / 35.1 E / 61.9 C / 33.2
MnDOT Analysis C / 22.8 C / 26.3 D / 51.9 D / 42.8 A / 8.3 D / 49.9 E / 78.2 D / 45.9 A / 8.6 C / 20.4 E / 55.1 B / 15.0 B / 11.8 E / 58.8 A / 8.5
July Counts C / 30.2 C / 21.0 D / 44.1 D / 39.7 A / 7.6 D / 37.6 D / 54.7 D / 43.0 A / 8.0 C / 27.9 D / 49.3 C / 24.36 C / 34.1 E / 61.9 C / 32.1
MnDOT Analysis D / 47.8 D / 36.2 D / 46.2 E / 71.6 B / 14.9 D / 48.3 E / 57.0 E / 64.2 B / 11.5 E / 58.5 E / 60.5 E / 58.2 C / 30.0 E / 69.0 C / 27.2
July Counts C / 31.7 C / 32.1 D / 45.6 E / 66.9 B / 15.9 D / 45.9 E / 57.6 E / 61.9 B / 11.1 C / 27.1 E / 59.4 C / 21.7 C / 32.7 E / 73.3 C / 29.8
MnDOT Analysis
July Counts C / 28.9 C / 31.0 D 41.8 E / 65.7 B / 15.5 D / 40.0 D / 48.0 E / 56.2 A / 9.9 C / 24.0 C / 30.1 C / 22.9 C / 31.2 D / 36.2 C / 30.8
MnDOT Analysis C / 33.6 C / 34.8 D / 44.6 E / 68.9 B / 14.3 D / 43.1 D / 50.9 E / 57.1 B / 10.2 C / 33.0 E / 60.5 C 32.0 A / 4.1 C / 29.3 E / 69.0 C / 28.2 A / 5.9
July Counts C / 25.6 C / 31.0 D / 41.8 E / 65.7 B / 15.5 D / 40.0 D / 48.0 E / 56.2 A / 9.9 B / 19.5 C / 26.2 C / 20.1 A / 5.8 C / 27.1 C / 27.3 C / 29.5 A / 0.3
Option 2 - Wstbound Right Turn Lane with Protected/Premissive Phasing
Option 3 - Westbound Right Turn Lane with Flashing Yellow Arrow Phasing
Option 4 - Westbound, Northbound and Southbound Right Turn Lanes with Flashing Yellow Arrow Phasing
Overall Option
Eastbound NorthboundWestbound Southbound
Existing
Option 1 - Westbound Right Turn Lane with Existing Phasing
)x
?¾A@
Pine St
7th St
Locu
s
t
S
t
Ced
a
r
S
t
Palm St
Rams
e
y
S
t
Hen
i
p
i
n
S
t
Wash
i
n
g
t
o
n
S
t
Wright St
Maple St
Linn
S
t
5th St
3rd St E
E Broad
w
a
y
S
t
W 3rd St
W 4th St
Walnu
t
S
t
Bento
n
S
t
6th St 4th St E
W Broad
w
a
y
S
t
E River St
Fallo
n
A
v
e
CSAH 14
ISTH 94
Source: Esri, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, GeoEye, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, and the GIS UserCommunity
K:
\
0
2
5
9
6
-
1
0
0
\
G
I
S
\
M
a
p
s
\
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
_
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
T
r
a
i
l
.
m
x
d
Ü
0 500 Feet
Potential 2016 Sidewalk & Trail Construction Monticello, MN
Proposed Trail (10’)
Proposed Sidewalk (6’)
Replace Sidewalk
Existing Path
Existing Sidewalk
Crosswalk
Figure Number
10
Fi
g
u
r
e
N
u
m
b
e
r
WS
B
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
N
o
.
0
2
5
9
6
-
1
0
0
701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300Minneapolis, MN 554162016 STR
E
E
T
R
E
C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
I
N
G
&
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
,
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
De
c
e
m
b
e
r
1
4
,
2
0
1
5
Ci
t
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
N
o
.
1
5
C
0
0
1
11
UT
I
L
I
T
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
K:\02596-100\Cad\Exhibits\OVERALL FIG.dwg
Fi
g
u
r
e
N
u
m
b
e
r
WS
B
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
N
o
.
0
2
5
9
6
-
1
0
0
701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300Minneapolis, MN 554162016 STR
E
E
T
R
E
C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
I
N
G
&
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
,
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
De
c
e
m
b
e
r
1
4
,
2
0
1
5
Ci
t
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
N
o
.
1
5
C
0
0
1
12
UT
I
L
I
T
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
K:\02596-100\Cad\Exhibits\OVERALL FIG.dwg
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100
APPENDIX B
Opinion of Probable Cost
WSB Project:2016 Recon Design By:BFB
Project Loc:City of Monticello Checked By:EME
City Project No.:15C001
WSB Proj No:2596-100 Date:12/9/2015
Item
No.
MN/DOT
Specification
No.
DescriptionUnit
Estimated
Total
Quantity
Estimated Unit
Price Estimated Total Cost
12021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM1$96,226.00$96,226.00
22101.502 CLEARINGTREE64$300.00$19,200.00
32101.507 GRUBBINGTREE64$300.00$19,200.00
42101.603 ROOT CUTTINGLIN FT492$3.00$1,476.00
52101.610 TREE TRIMMINGHOUR13$150.00$1,950.00
62104.501 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTERLIN FT6,694$2.50 $16,735.00
72104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE WALKSQ FT3,300$2.00$6,600.00
82104.503 REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALKSQ FT0$2.00$0.00
92104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD700$3.00$2,100.00
102104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEW AY PAVEMENTSQ YD1,100$3.00$3,300.00
112104.509 REMOVE MAILBOX SUPPORTEACH61$20.00$1,240.00
122104.509 REMOVE MAILBOX EACH109$15.00$1,365.00
132104.509 REMOVE SIGNEACH143$20.00$1,650.00
142104.511 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT1,410$3.50$4,935.00
152104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT430$3.00$1,290.00
162104.601 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL LANDSCAPE STRUCTURESLUMP SUM1 $20,000.00$20,000.00
172104.602 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL MAILBOXEACH109$50.00$5,450.00
182104.603 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL FENCELIN FT1,834$45.00$82,530.00
192105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (P)CU YD2,600$8.00$20,800.00
202105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATIONCU YD5,858$8.00$46,864.00
212105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV)CU YD5,900$12.00$70,800.00
222105.525 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV)CU YD3,036$20.00$60,720.00
232112.501 SUBGRADE PREPARATIONROAD STA143$100.00$14,300.00
242123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HOUR51$130.00$6,630.00
252130.501 WATERMGAL408$40.00$16,320.00
262211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON10,460$14.00$146,440.00
272215.501 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATIONSQ YD60,364$3.00$181,092.00
282357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COATGALLON3,500$3.50$12,250.00
292360.501 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,B)TON5,193$64.00$332,352.00
302360.502 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3,B)TON7,043$64.00$450,752.00
312360.503 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) (3.0" THICK)SQ YD572$30.00$17,160.00
322505.601 UTILITY COORDINATIONLUMP SUM1$5,000.00$5,000.00
332506.522 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING (SANITARY)EACH27$350.00$9,450.00
342506.522 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING (STORM)EACH9$400.00$3,600.00
352521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT3,290$6.00 $19,740.00
362531.501 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618LIN FT6,694 $12.00$80,328.00
372531.507 7" CONCRETE DRIVEW AY PAVEMENTSQ YD648 $55.00$35,640.00
382531.602 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPEACH29 $500.00$14,500.00
392531.618 TRUNCATED DOMESSQ FT348 $40.00$13,920.00
402540.601 RAILROAD IMPROVEMENTSLUMP SUM1$50,000.00$50,000.00
412540.602 MAILBOXEACH102$50.00$5,100.00
422540.602 MAILBOX SUPPORTEACH62$150.00$9,300.00
432540.602 MAILBOX (TEMPORARY)EACH102$10.00$1,020.00
442563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROLLUMP SUM1$10,000.00$10,000.00
452571.501 CONIFEROUS TREE 8' HT B&BTREE35$350.00$12,250.00
462571.502 DECIDUOUS TREE 2.5" CAL B&BTREE29$350.00$10,150.00
472573.502 SILT FENCE, TYPE MACHINE SLICEDLIN FT1,407$3.50$4,924.50
482573.535 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXITEACH13$1,000.00$13,000.00
Opinion of Probable Cost
A. SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS
K:\02596-100\Quantity\Preliminary\QTY TAKE OFF_111815
WSB Project:2016 Recon Design By:BFB
Project Loc:City of Monticello Checked By:EME
City Project No.:15C001
WSB Proj No:2596-100 Date:12/9/2015
Item
No.
MN/DOT
Specification
No.
DescriptionUnit
Estimated
Total
Quantity
Estimated Unit
Price Estimated Total Cost
Opinion of Probable Cost
492575.502 SEED MIXTURE 250POUND0$3.00$0.00
502575.502 SEED MIXTURE 260POUND0$3.00$0.00
512575.505 SODDING TYPE LAWNSQ YD20,233$3.00$60,699.00
522575.523 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3SQ YD112$3.50$392.00
532575.605 HYDROSEEDINGACRE0$3,000.00$0.00
542582.502 4" SOLID LINE WHITE-EPOXYLIN FT0$1.50$0.00
552582.502 12" SOLID LINE WHITE-EPOXYLIN FT0$12.00$0.00
562582.502 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW-EPOXYLIN FT0$3.00$0.00
572582.503 CROSSWALK MARKING - EPOXYSQ FT0$10.00$0.00
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL$2,020,740.00
CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%)$202,074.00
SUBTOTAL TOTAL$2,222,814.00
INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%)$489,019.08
TOTAL - SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS$2,711,833.08
K:\02596-100\Quantity\Preliminary\QTY TAKE OFF_111815
WSB Project:2016 Recon Design By:BFB
Project Loc:City of Monticello Checked By:EME
City Project No.:15C001
WSB Proj No:2596-100 Date:12/9/2015
Item
No.
MN/DOT
Specification
No.
DescriptionUnit
Estimated
Total
Quantity
Estimated Unit
Price Estimated Total Cost
Opinion of Probable Cost
582021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM1$41,209.00$41,209.00
592105.602 EXCAVATE TO LOCATE SERVICEEACH135$300.00$40,500.00
602104.501 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (SANITARY)LIN FT5,425$1.00$5,425.00
612104.501 REMOVE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PIPELIN FT 6,935$1.00$6,935.00
622105.601 DEWATERINGLUMP SUM1$10,000.00$10,000.00
632502.602 SANITARY SERVICE CLEAN OUTEACH1$250.00$250.00
642503.601 SANITARY SEWER BYPASS PUMPINGLUMP SUM1$30,000.00$30,000.00
652503.602 8"X4" PVC WYEEACH135$250.00$33,750.00
662503.602 8"X6" PVC WYEEACH0$300.00$0.00
672503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SERVICEEACH135$350.00$47,250.00
682503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWEREACH8$4,000.00$32,000.00
692503.602 CHIMNEY SEAL (EXTERNAL)EACH0$300.00$0.00
702503.603 SANITARY SEWER LINING (8")LIN FT1,813$45.00$81,585.00
712503.603 SANITARY SEWER LINING (10")LIN FT2,449$50.00$122,450.00
722503.603 SANITARY SEWER LINING (12")LIN FT399$55.00$21,945.00
732503.603 4" PVC PIPE SEWER - SDR 26LIN FT1,530$28.00$42,840.00
742503.603 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PIPE SPECIALLIN FT6,103$33.00$201,399.00
752503.603 6" PVC PIPE SEWER - SDR 26LIN FT200$30.00$6,000.00
762503.603 8" PVC PIPE SEWER - SDR 35LIN FT3,758$30.00$112,740.00
772503.603 8" PVC PIPE SEWER - SDR 35 (RESTRICTED TRENCH)LIN FT0 $50.00$0.00
782503.603 TELEVISE SANITARY SEWERLIN FT6,606$1.50$9,909.00
792506.602 RECONSTRUCT MANHOLELIN FT5 $200.00$1,000.00
802506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLYEACH26$700.00$18,200.00
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $865,390.00
CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%)$86,539.00
SUBTOTAL TOTAL$951,929.00
INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%)$209,424.38
TOTAL - SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS$1,161,353.38
B. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
K:\02596-100\Quantity\Preliminary\QTY TAKE OFF_111815
WSB Project:2016 Recon Design By:BFB
Project Loc:City of Monticello Checked By:EME
City Project No.:15C001
WSB Proj No:2596-100 Date:12/9/2015
Item
No.
MN/DOT
Specification
No.
DescriptionUnit
Estimated
Total
Quantity
Estimated Unit
Price Estimated Total Cost
Opinion of Probable Cost
812104.501 REMOVE WATER MAINLIN FT2,407$4.00$9,628.00
822104.501 REMOVE WATER SERVICE PIPELIN FT114$2.00$228.00
832104.503 REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALKSQ FT840$2.00$1,680.00
842104.509 REMOVE GATE VALVE EACH53$150.00$7,950.00
852104.509 REMOVE CURB STOP AND BOXEACH0 $65.00$0.00
862104.509 REMOVE HYDRANTEACH25$250.00$6,250.00
872104.601 TEMPORARY WATER SERVICEL. SUM1$30,000.00$30,000.00
882231.601 BITUMINOUS PATCHINGSQ FT840$16.00$13,440.00
892504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAINEACH78$650.00$50,700.00
902504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICEEACH0$150.00$0.00
912504.602 1" CORPORATION STOPEACH0$300.00$0.00
922504.602 1" CURB STOP AND BOXEACH0 $350.00$0.00
932504.602 HYDRANTEACH25$4,000.00$100,000.00
942504.602 6" GATE VALVE AND BOXEACH41$1,500.00$61,500.00
952504.602 8" GATE VALVE AND BOXEACH6$2,000.00$12,000.00
962504.602 10" GATE VALVE AND BOXEACH5$2,250.00$11,250.00
972504.602 12" GATE VALVE AND BOXEACH4$2,500.00$10,000.00
982504.603 6" WATERMAIN DIP CL 52 W/POLY WRAPLIN FT1,293$30.00$38,790.00
992504.603 8" WATER MAIN DIP CL 52 W/'POLY WRAPLIN FT184$35.00$6,440.00
1012504.603 12" WATER MAIN DIP CL 52 W/POLYWRAPLIN FT930$45.00$41,850.00
1002504.603 16" WATER MAIN DIP CL 52 W/POLY WRAPLIN FT3,003$70.00$210,210.00
1022504.603 1" COPPER WATER SERVICE PIPELIN FT115$15.00$1,725.00
1032504.603 26" STEEL CASING PIPE (JACKED)LIN FT50$200.00$10,000.00
1042504.604 4" POLYSTYRENE INUSLATIONSQ YD26$35.00$910.00
1052504.608 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS-EXPOXY COATED (16")POUND7,605$4.00 $30,420.00
1062504.608 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS-EXPOXY COATEDPOUND6,878$4.00 $27,512.00
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $682,480.00
CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%)$68,248.00
SUBTOTAL TOTAL$750,728.00
INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%)$165,160.16
TOTAL - WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS$915,888.16
C. WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS
K:\02596-100\Quantity\Preliminary\QTY TAKE OFF_111815
WSB Project:2016 Recon Design By:BFB
Project Loc:City of Monticello Checked By:EME
City Project No.:15C001
WSB Proj No:2596-100 Date:12/9/2015
Item
No.
MN/DOT
Specification
No.
DescriptionUnit
Estimated
Total
Quantity
Estimated Unit
Price Estimated Total Cost
Opinion of Probable Cost
1072104.501 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM)LIN FT993$10.00$9,930.00
1082104.509 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTUREEACH11 $400.00$4,400.00
1092104.523 SALVAGE CASTINGEACH104$100.00$10,400.00
1102501.515 12" RC PIPE APRONEACH1$500.00$500.00
1112503.541 12" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS VLIN FT1,040$28.00$29,120.00
1122503.541 15" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS VLIN FT55$30.00$1,650.00
1132503.541 18" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS VLIN FT251$33.00$8,283.00
1142503.541 27" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS VLIN FT30$45.00$1,350.00
1152503.541 30" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS VLIN FT0$55.00$0.00
1162506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020LIN FT85$275.00$23,375.00
1172506.502 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 1EACH6$1,500.00$9,000.00
1182506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLYEACH84$600.00$50,400.00
1192506.602 CONNECT INTO EXISTING CATCH BASINEACH0$800.00$0.00
1202550.604 PATCH EXISTING STORM SEWEREACH14$500.00$7,000.00
1212573.530 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTIONEACH72$150.00$10,800.00
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $166,210.00
CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%)$16,621.00
SUBTOTAL TOTAL$182,831.00
INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%)$40,222.82
TOTAL - DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS$223,053.82
1222104.501 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTERLIN FT240$3.50 $840.00
1232104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD120$3.00$360.00
1242104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT100$3.00$300.00
1252105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (P)CU YD210$8.00$1,680.00
1262105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATIONCU YD100$8.00$800.00
1272105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV)CU YD100$12.00$1,200.00
1282112.501 SUBGRADE PREPARATIONROAD STA6$100.00$600.00
1292211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON437$14.00$6,118.00
1302215.501 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATIONSQ YD1,770$3.00$5,310.00
1312357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COATGALLON140$3.50$490.00
1322360.501 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B)TON235$66.00$15,510.00
1332360.502 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (2,B)TON314$66.00$20,724.00
1342503.541 15" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS VLIN FT245$30.00$7,350.00
1352506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020LIN FT15$275.00$4,125.00
1362506.502 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 1EACH1$1,500.00$1,500.00
1372506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY (CATCH BASIN)EACH4$650.00$2,600.00
1382506.522 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING (SANITARY)EACH1$350.00$350.00
1392531.501 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618LIN FT975 $12.00$11,700.00
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $81,560.00
CONTINGENCY TOTAL (20%)$16,312.00
SUBTOTAL TOTAL$97,872.00
INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%)$21,531.84
TOTAL - SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS$119,403.84
D. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
E. CEDAR AVE EXTENSION SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS
K:\02596-100\Quantity\Preliminary\QTY TAKE OFF_111815
WSB Project:2016 Recon Design By:BFB
Project Loc:City of Monticello Checked By:EME
City Project No.:15C001
WSB Proj No:2596-100 Date:12/9/2015
Item
No.
MN/DOT
Specification
No.
DescriptionUnit
Estimated
Total
Quantity
Estimated Unit
Price Estimated Total Cost
Opinion of Probable Cost
1402021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM1$10,352.00$10,352.00
1412101.610 TREE TRIMMINGHOUR2$150.00$300.00
1422104.501 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTERLIN FT474$3.50$1,659.00
1432104.501 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM)LIN FT35$10.00$350.00
1442104.509 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTUREEACH1 $400.00$400.00
1452104.509 REMOVE SIGNEACH12$30.00$360.00
1462105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (P)CU YD600$8.00$4,800.00
1472105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV)CU YD100$12.00$1,200.00
1482112.501 SUBGRADE PREPARATIONROAD STA5$100.00$500.00
1492123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HOUR2$130.00$260.00
1502211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON797$14.00$11,158.00
1512215.501 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTSQ YD2,298$3.00$6,894.00
1522232.501 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2.0")SQ YD6,869$1.75$12,020.75
1532357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COATGALLON700$3.50$2,450.00
1542360.501 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B)TON1,343$66.00$88,638.00
1552360.502 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (2,B)TON533$66.00$35,178.00
1562503.541 12" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS VLIN FT50$28.00$1,400.00
1572504.602 ADJUST GATE VALVE AND BOXEACH11$500.00$5,500.00
1582505.601 UTILITY COORDINATIONLUMP SUM1$500.00$500.00
1592506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020LIN FT4$275.00$1,100.00
1602506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY (CATCH BASIN)EACH2$650.00$1,300.00
1612506.602 ADJUST CASTING ASSEMBLY (SANITARY MANHOLE)EACH8$700.00$5,600.00
1622531.501 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618LIN FT474 $12.00$5,688.00
1632573.502 SILT FENCE, TYPE MACHINE SLICEDLIN FT500$3.50$1,750.00
1642573.535 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXITLUMP SUM2$1,000.00$2,000.00
1652575.505 SODDING TYPE LAWNSQ YD380$3.00$1,140.00
1662575.605 HYDROSEEDINGACRE0.22$3,000.00$654.60
1672582.502 4" SOLID LINE WHITE-EPOXYLIN FT4,740$1.50$7,110.00
1682582.502 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW-EPOXYLIN FT2,370$3.00$7,110.00
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $217,370.00
CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%)$21,737.00
SUBTOTAL TOTAL$239,107.00
INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%)$52,603.54
TOTAL - SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS$291,710.54
1692021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM1$29,922.00$29,922.00
1702101.502 CLEARINGTREE4$300.00$1,200.00
1712101.507 GRUBBINGTREE4$300.00$1,200.00
1722104.501 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTERLIN FT438$2.50$1,095.00
1732104.501 REMOVE RETAINING WALLSQ FT1,440$8.00$11,520.00
1742104.501 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM)LIN FT16$6.50$104.00
1752104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE WALKSQ FT2,205$2.00$4,410.00
1762104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD78$3.50$273.00
1772104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEW AY PAVEMENTSQ YD18$6.00 $108.00
1782104.509 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTUREEACH2 $400.00$800.00
1792104.511 SAWING CONCRETE WALKLIN FT6$3.00 $18.00
1802104.523 SALVAGE CASTINGEACH3$100.00$300.00
G. 7TH STREET RIGHT TURN LANE IMPROVEMENTS
F. 7TH STREET SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS
K:\02596-100\Quantity\Preliminary\QTY TAKE OFF_111815
WSB Project:2016 Recon Design By:BFB
Project Loc:City of Monticello Checked By:EME
City Project No.:15C001
WSB Proj No:2596-100 Date:12/9/2015
Item
No.
MN/DOT
Specification
No.
DescriptionUnit
Estimated
Total
Quantity
Estimated Unit
Price Estimated Total Cost
Opinion of Probable Cost
1812104.603 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL FENCELIN FT350$10.00$3,500.00
1822104.618 SALVAGE RETAINING WALL - LIMESTONESQ FT2,000$5.00$10,000.00
1832105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (P)CU YD1,590$8.00$12,720.00
1842105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATIONCU YD0$8.00$0.00
1852105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV)CU YD0$12.00$0.00
1862112.501 SUBGRADE PREPARATIONROAD STA4$100.00$400.00
1872211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON536$14.00$7,504.00
1882357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COATGALLON28$3.50$98.00
1892360.501 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B)TON123$66.00$8,118.00
1902360.502 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (2,B)TON92$66.00$6,072.00
1912360.503 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) (3.0" THICK)SQ YD78$30.00$2,340.00
1922411.618 RETAINING WALLSQ FT4,180$50.00$209,000.00
1932452.618 STEEL SHEET PILINGSQ FT6,600$35.00$231,000.00
1942503.541 12" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS VLIN FT40$28.00$1,120.00
1952503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWEREACH2$250.00$500.00
1962505.601 UTILITY COORDINATIONLUMP SUM1$1,000.00$1,000.00
1972506.502 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 1EACH2$1,500.00$3,000.00
1982506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY (MANHOLE)EACH1$400.00$400.00
1992506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY (CATCH BASIN)EACH2$650.00$1,300.00
2002521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT2,030$7.00 $14,210.00
2012531.501 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618LIN FT438 $11.00$4,818.00
2022531.602 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPEACH1 $500.00$500.00
2032531.507 7" CONCRETE DRIVEW AY PAVEMENTSQ YD18 $55.00$990.00
2042531.618 TRUNCATED DOMESSQ FT48 $46.00$2,208.00
2052563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROLLUMP SUM1$5,000.00$5,000.00
2062565.616 REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEMLUMP SUM1$35,000.00$35,000.00
2072571.501 CONIFEROUS TREE 8' HT B&BTREE3$350.00$1,050.00
2082571.502 DECIDUOUS TREE 2.5" CAL B&BTREE1$350.00$350.00
2092582.502 4" SOLID SINGLE WHITE STRIPING (EPOXY)LIN FT330$1.50$495.00
2102582.503 CROSSWALK MARKING - COLORED THERMOPLASTICSQ FT588$25.00$14,700.00
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $628,340.00
CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%)$62,834.00
SUBTOTAL TOTAL$691,174.00
INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%)$152,058.28
TOTAL - WEST BOUND INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS $843,232.28
2112021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM1$9,770.00$9,770.00
2122104.501 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTERLIN FT356$2.50 $890.00
2132104.501 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM)LIN FT58$6.50$377.00
2142104.501 REMOVE PAVEMENT MARKING (CROSSWALK)SQ FT162$11.00$1,782.00
2152104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE WALKSQ FT2,020$2.00$4,040.00
2162104.509 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTUREEACH2 $400.00$800.00
2172104.511 SAWING CONCRETE WALKLIN FT5$3.00 $15.00
2182104.523 SALVAGE CASTINGEACH2$100.00$200.00
2192105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (P)CU YD77$8.00$616.00
2202105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATIONCU YD257$8.00$2,056.00
2212105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV)CU YD257$12.00$3,084.00
2222112.501 SUBGRADE PREPARATIONROAD STA4$100.00$400.00
H. TH 25 AT 7TH STREET NORTH BOUND RT LANE IMPROVEMENTS
K:\02596-100\Quantity\Preliminary\QTY TAKE OFF_111815
WSB Project:2016 Recon Design By:BFB
Project Loc:City of Monticello Checked By:EME
City Project No.:15C001
WSB Proj No:2596-100 Date:12/9/2015
Item
No.
MN/DOT
Specification
No.
DescriptionUnit
Estimated
Total
Quantity
Estimated Unit
Price Estimated Total Cost
Opinion of Probable Cost
2232211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON158$14.00$2,212.00
2242357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COATGALLON20$3.50$70.00
2252360.501 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B)TON87$66.00$5,742.00
2262360.502 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (2,B)TON87$66.00$5,742.00
2272411.618 MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALLSQ FT1,700$40.00$68,000.00
2282503.541 12" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS VLIN FT10$28.00$280.00
2292503.541 15" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS VLIN FT60$30.00$1,800.00
2302503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWEREACH2$250.00$500.00
2312505.601 UTILITY COORDINATIONLUMP SUM1$1,000.00$1,000.00
2322506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020LIN FT5$275.00$1,375.00
2332506.502 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 1EACH1$1,500.00$1,500.00
2342506.522 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING (STORM)EACH1$400.00$400.00
2352521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT2,575$7.00 $18,025.00
2362531.501 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B624LIN FT356 $18.00$6,408.00
2372531.602 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPEACH1 $500.00$500.00
2382531.618 TRUNCATED DOMESSQ FT12 $46.00$552.00
2392563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROLLUMP SUM1$5,000.00$5,000.00
2402565.616 REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEMLUMP SUM1$50,000.00$50,000.00
2412582.502 4" SOLID SINGLE WHITE STRIPING (EPOXY)LIN FT320$1.50$480.00
2422582.503 CROSSWALK MARKING - COLORED THERMOPLASTICSQ FT462$25.00$11,550.00
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $205,170.00
CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%)$20,517.00
SUBTOTAL TOTAL$225,687.00
INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%)$49,651.14
TOTAL - NORTH BOUND INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS $275,338.14
2432021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM1$7,569.00$7,569.00
2442104.501 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTERLIN FT305$2.50 $762.50
2452104.501 REMOVE RETAINING WALLSQ FT0$8.00$0.00
2462104.501 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM)LIN FT8$6.50$52.00
2472104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE WALKSQ FT1,930$2.00$3,860.00
2482104.509 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTUREEACH1 $400.00$400.00
2492104.511 SAWING CONCRETE WALKLIN FT11$3.00 $33.00
2502104.523 SALVAGE CASTINGEACH1$100.00$100.00
2512105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (P)CU YD63$8.00$504.00
2522105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATIONCU YD210$8.00$1,680.00
2532105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV)CU YD210$12.00$2,520.00
2542112.501 SUBGRADE PREPARATIONROAD STA3$100.00$300.00
2552211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON129$14.00$1,806.00
2562357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COATGALLON16$3.50$56.00
2572360.501 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B)TON70$66.00$4,620.00
2582360.502 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (2,B)TON70$66.00$4,620.00
2592411.603 CONCRETE WALLS AT CORNERSEACH1 $15,000.00$15,000.00
2602505.601 UTILITY COORDINATIONLUMP SUM1$1,000.00$1,000.00
2612506.501 RECONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURELIN FT5 $275.00$1,375.00
2622506.522 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING (STORM)EACH1$400.00$400.00
2632521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT1,860$7.00 $13,020.00
2642521.618 4" STAMPED COLORED CONCRETE WALKSQ FT1,240 $15.50$19,220.00
I. TH 25 AT 7TH STREET SOUTH BOUND RT TURN LANE IMPROVEMENTS
K:\02596-100\Quantity\Preliminary\QTY TAKE OFF_111815
WSB Project:2016 Recon Design By:BFB
Project Loc:City of Monticello Checked By:EME
City Project No.:15C001
WSB Proj No:2596-100 Date:12/9/2015
Item
No.
MN/DOT
Specification
No.
DescriptionUnit
Estimated
Total
Quantity
Estimated Unit
Price Estimated Total Cost
Opinion of Probable Cost
2652521.618 DECORATIVE CONCRETE PLAZA PAVEMENTSQ FT240 $16.00$3,840.00
2662531.501 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B624LIN FT305 $18.00$5,490.00
2672531.602 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPEACH2 $500.00$1,000.00
2682531.618 TRUNCATED DOMESSQ FT36 $46.00$1,656.00
2692563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROLLUMP SUM1$5,000.00$5,000.00
2702565.616 REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEMLUMP SUM1$50,000.00$50,000.00
2712575.505 SODDING TYPE LAWN (INCL TOPSOIL & FERT)SQ YD309$5.00$1,545.00
2722582.502 4" SOLID SINGLE WHITE STRIPING (EPOXY)LIN FT270$1.50$405.00
2732582.503 CROSSWALK MARKING - COLORED THERMOPLASTICSQ FT444$25.00$11,100.00
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $158,930.00
CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%)$15,893.00
SUBTOTAL TOTAL$174,823.00
INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%)$38,461.06
TOTAL - SOUTH BOUND INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS $213,284.06
274 2.5" CAL. SHADE TREESEACH8$600.00$4,800.00
275 1.5" CAL. ORNAMENTAL TREESEACH9$450.00$4,050.00
276 5 GAL SHRUBSEACH41 $60.00$2,460.00
277 ORNAMENTAL PERENNIALS AND GRASSESSQ FT290$15.00$4,350.00
278 PLANTING SOILS FOR BOULEVARDCU YD77$40.00$3,080.00
279 IRRIGATIONLUMP SUM1$15,000.00$15,000.00
280 6' BENCH - GALVANIZED AND POWDER COATEDEACH2$1,050.00$2,100.00
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $35,840.00
CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%)$3,584.00
SUBTOTAL TOTAL$39,424.00
INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%)$8,673.28
TOTAL - TH25 TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS$48,097.28
J. TH 25 AND 7TH LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
K:\02596-100\Quantity\Preliminary\QTY TAKE OFF_111815
WSB Project:2016 Recon Design By:BFB
Project Location:City of Monticello Checked By:EME
City Project No.:15C001
WSB Project No:2596-100 Date:12/9/2015
Item No.
MN/DOT
Specification
No.
DescriptionUnit
Estimated
Total
Quantity
Estimated
Unit Price
Estimated Total
Cost
2812104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE WALKSQ FT2,310$2.00$4,620.00
2822104.603 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL FENCELIN FT235$10.00$2,350.00
2832105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (P)CU YD107$8.00$856.00
2842411.603 CONCRETE WALLS AT CORNERSEACH1$15,000.00$15,000.00
2852411.618 RETAINING WALLSQ FT1,650$50.00$82,500.00
2862521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT1,825$5.00$9,125.00
2872521.501 4" COLORED CONCRETE BANDSSQ FT775$15.00$11,625.00
2882521.618 4" STAMPED COLORED CONCRETE WALKSQ FT860$15.50$13,330.00
2892521.618 DECORATIVE CONCRETE PLAZA PAVEMENTSQ FT1,140$16.00$18,240.00
2902531.602 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPEACH3$500.00$1,500.00
2912531.618 TRUNCATED DOMESSQ FT40$35.00$1,400.00
2922575.505 SODDING TYPE LAWN (INCL TOPSOIL & FERT)SQ YD108$5.00$540.00
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL$161,090.00
CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%)$16,109.00
SUBTOTAL TOTAL$177,199.00
INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%)$38,983.78
TOTAL - TH25 TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS$216,182.78
2932104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE WALKSQ FT2,690$2.00$5,380.00
2942105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV)CU YD561$12.00$6,732.00
2952521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT2,330$5.00$11,650.00
2962531.602 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPEACH12$500.00$6,000.00
2972531.618 TRUNCATED DOMESSQ FT144$35.00$5,040.00
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL$34,800.00
CONTINGENCY TOTAL (30%)$10,440.00
SUBTOTAL TOTAL$45,240.00
INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%)$9,952.80
TOTAL - BROADWAY ST SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS$55,192.80
2982355.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR FOG SEALGAL105$4.50$472.50
2992356.505 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR SEAL COATGAL220$2.10$462.00
3002356.604 SEAL COAT AGGREGATE FA-2SQ YD875$2.25$1,968.75
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL$2,900.00
CONTINGENCY TOTAL (30%)$870.00
SUBTOTAL TOTAL$3,770.00
INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%)$829.40
TOTAL - 4TH STREET PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS$4,599.40
L. BROADWAY ST SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS (CEDAR TO WASHIN
M. 4TH STREET PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS
Opinion of Probable Cost
K. TH 25 SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS (E. SIDE 7TH TO 6TH)
WSB Project:2016 Recon Design By:BFB
Project Location:City of Monticello Checked By:EME
City Project No.:15C001
WSB Project No:2596-100 Date:12/9/2015
Item No.
MN/DOT
Specification
No.
DescriptionUnit
Estimated
Total
Quantity
Estimated
Unit Price
Estimated Total
Cost
Opinion of Probable Cost
3012105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV)CU YD259$12.00$3,108.00
3022521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT6,450$5.00$32,250.00
3032531.602 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPEACH12$500.00$6,000.00
3042531.618 TRUNCATED DOMESSQ FT144$46.00$6,624.00
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL$47,980.00
CONTINGENCY TOTAL (30%)$14,394.00
SUBTOTAL TOTAL$62,374.00
INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%)$13,722.28
TOTAL - CEDAR AVE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS$76,096.28
3052101.502 CLEARINGTREE3$300.00$900.00
3062101.507 GRUBBINGTREE3$300.00$900.00
3072104.501 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTERLIN FT16$2.50$40.00
3082104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE WALKSQ FT51$2.00$102.00
3092104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD221$3.50$773.50
3102104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD100$6.00$600.00
3112104.511 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT17$3.50$59.50
3122104.601 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL LANDSCAPE STRUCTURESLUMP SUM1$500.00$500.00
3132104.603 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL FENCELIN FT112$10.00$1,120.00
3142105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV)CU YD182$12.00$2,184.00
3152360.503 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) (3.0" THICK)SQ YD81$30.00$2,430.00
3162521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT4,518$5.00$22,590.00
3172531.507 7" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD92$55.00$5,060.00
3182531.602 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPEACH5$500.00$2,500.00
3192531.618 TRUNCATED DOMESSQ FT60$35.00$2,100.00
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL$41,860.00
CONTINGENCY TOTAL (30%)$12,558.00
SUBTOTAL TOTAL$54,418.00
INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%)$11,971.96
TOTAL - 3RD STREET TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS$66,389.96
3202104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE WALKSQ FT1,350$2.00$2,700.00
3212211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON557$14.00$7,798.00
3222360.503 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) (3.0" THICK)SQ YD1,623$30.00$48,690.00
3232531.602 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPEACH9$500.00$4,500.00
3242531.618 TRUNCATED DOMESSQ FT144$46.00$6,624.00
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL$70,310.00
CONTINGENCY TOTAL (30%)$21,093.00
SUBTOTAL TOTAL$91,403.00
INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%)$20,108.66
TOTAL - WASHINGTON AVE TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS$111,511.66
N. CEDAR AVE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS (W. SIDE 4TH TO 7TH)
P. WASHINGTON AVE TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS (W. SIDE 7TH TO BROA
O. CEDAR STREET SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS (E. SIDE 4TH TO
BROADWAY)
WSB Project:2016 Recon Design By:BFB
Project Location:City of Monticello Checked By:EME
City Project No.:15C001
WSB Project No:2596-100 Date:12/9/2015
Item No.
MN/DOT
Specification
No.
DescriptionUnit
Estimated
Total
Quantity
Estimated
Unit Price
Estimated Total
Cost
Opinion of Probable Cost
3252105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV)CU YD74$12.00$888.00
3262521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT1,830$5.00$9,150.00
3272531.602 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPEACH7$500.00$3,500.00
3282531.618 TRUNCATED DOMESSQ FT84$35.00$2,940.00
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL$16,480.00
CONTINGENCY TOTAL (30%)$4,944.00
SUBTOTAL TOTAL$21,424.00
INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%)$4,713.28
TOTAL - 7TH STREET SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS$26,137.28
12360.503 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) (2.0" THICK)SQ YD1,760$20.00$35,200.00
22531.602 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPEACH20$500.00$10,000.00
32531.618 TRUNCATED DOMESSQ FT320$46.00$14,720.00
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL$59,920.00
CONTINGENCY TOTAL (30%)$17,976.00
SUBTOTAL TOTAL$77,896.00
INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%)$17,137.12
TOTAL - 7TH STREET TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS$95,033.12
12104.501 REMOVE WATER MAINLIN FT8$4.00$32.00
22104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTSQ YD27$3.00$81.00
32104.509 REMOVE GATE VALVE EACH2$150.00$300.00
42104.603 ABANDON WATERMAINLIN FT55$10.00$550.00
52215.501 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTSQ YD755$3.00$2,265.00
62360.503 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) (3.0" THICK)SQ YD755$30.00$22,650.00
72503.602 8" PIPE PLUGEACH1$150.00$150.00
82504.601 RENOVATE PUMP HOUSELUMP SUM1$15,000.00$15,000.00
92504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAINEACH1$650.00$650.00
102504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICEEACH1$150.00$150.00
112504.602 HYDRANTEACH1$4,000.00$4,000.00
122504.602 6" GATE VALVE AND BOXEACH1$1,500.00$1,500.00
132504.602 8" GATE VALVE AND BOXEACH1$2,000.00$2,000.00
142504.602 10" GATE VALVE AND BOXEACH2$2,250.00$4,500.00
152504.603 6" WATERMAIN DIP CL 52 W/POLY WRAPLIN FT40$30.00$1,200.00
162504.603 10" WATER MAIN DIP CL 52 W/'POLY WRAPLIN FT168$40.00$6,720.00
172504.603 1" COPPER WATER SERVICE PIPELIN FT50$15.00$750.00
182504.608 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS-EXPOXY COATEDPOUND2,725$4.00$10,900.00
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL$73,400.00
CONTINGENCY TOTAL (10%)$7,340.00
SUBTOTAL TOTAL$80,740.00
INDIRECT COST TOTAL (22%)$17,762.80
TOTAL - 3RD STREET TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS$98,502.80
S. PUMP HOUSE IMPROVEMENTS
R. 7TH STREET TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS (N. SIDE CEDAR TO RAMSEY
Q. 7TH STREET SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS (S. SIDE TH25 TO CEDAR
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100
APPENDIX C
Preliminary Assessment Roll – Area 5
Assessment Map – Area 5
Pr
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
As
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
Ro
l
l
‐
Ar
e
a
5
20
1
6
S
T
R
E
E
T
R
E
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
CI
T
Y
O
F
M
O
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
,
W
R
I
G
H
T
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
CI
T
Y
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
O
.
1
5
C
0
0
1
Created: 12/8/15 Revised TOTAL
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
ST
R
E
E
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
N
O
N
R
E
S
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
No
I
D
E
N
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
N
O
.
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
O
W
N
E
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
M
A
I
L
I
N
G
A
S
S
E
S
S
A
B
L
E
R
A
T
E
T
O
T
A
L
F
F
R
A
T
E
T
O
T
A
L
A
S
S
E
S
S
M
E
N
T
(P
I
D
)
ADD
R
E
S
S
U
N
I
T
S
ARE
A
5
ARE
A
5
1
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
3
4
0
1
0
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
R
E
A
L
T
Y
L
T
D
21
6
P
I
N
E
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
6
6
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
3
4
0
2
0
C
I
T
Y
O
F
M
O
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
6
6
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
3
4
0
3
0
C
I
T
Y
O
F
M
O
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
6
6
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
3
4
0
4
0
C
I
T
Y
O
F
M
O
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
11
9
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
2
1
4
.
5
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
1
,
4
5
0
.
0
0
$
2
1
,
4
5
0
.
0
0
$
5
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
3
4
0
6
0
K
R
I
S
T
I
N
E
L
H
A
M
M
E
R
15
4
B
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
1
6
4
.
7
3
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
6
,
4
7
3
.
0
0
$
1
6
,
4
7
3
.
0
0
$
6
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
6
9
1
3
0
M
I
C
H
A
E
L
V
M
I
C
H
A
E
L
I
S
20
0
B
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
8
2
.
1
3
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
0
,
4
2
9
.
8
8
$
1
0
,
4
2
9
.
8
8
$
7
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
6
9
0
1
0
C
R
I
P
E
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
L
L
C
21
2
C
E
D
A
R
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
6
5
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
7
,
3
7
7
.
5
0
$
7
,
3
7
7
.
5
0
$
8
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
6
9
0
1
1
B
L
A
K
E
&
K
R
A
N
Z
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
I
N
C
21
6
C
E
D
A
R
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
1
2
6
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
3
,
9
5
0
.
0
0
$
1
3
,
9
5
0
.
0
0
$
9
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
6
9
0
2
0
M
O
S
B
A
R
T
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
21
3
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
1
2
2
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
2
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
2
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$
10
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
6
9
0
4
1
J
O
H
N
R
&
M
I
C
H
E
L
L
E
M
T
W
A
R
D
Y
22
5
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
2
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
11
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
6
9
0
8
0
A
R
V
E
A
&
J
E
A
N
A
G
R
I
M
S
M
O
25
0
B
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
1
2
7
.
4
0
5
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
2
,
7
4
0
.
5
0
$
1
2
,
7
4
0
.
5
0
$
12
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
6
8
0
4
1
S
H
I
R
L
E
Y
E
A
N
D
E
R
S
O
N
30
6
B
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
13
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
6
8
0
1
0
A
R
M
I
N
R
&
E
M
I
L
Y
J
D
I
E
R
S
E
N
30
1
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
2
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
14
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
6
8
0
2
0
JO
H
N
W
L
K
E
N
T
N
E
R
&
T
H
E
R
E
S
A
M
AN
D
E
R
S
O
N
-
K
E
N
T
N
E
R
30
7
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
15
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
6
8
0
3
0
N
A
N
C
Y
K
H
A
N
S
O
N
30
9
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
16
1
5
5
0
4
0
0
0
3
0
5
0
N
A
N
C
Y
K
H
A
N
S
O
N
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
17
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
6
8
0
3
1
B
R
A
N
D
O
N
M
A
S
O
N
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
18
1
5
5
0
4
0
0
0
3
0
4
0
B
R
A
N
D
O
N
M
A
S
O
N
31
5
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
19
1
5
5
0
4
0
0
0
3
0
3
0
J
I
L
L
L
O
R
R
A
I
N
E
A
G
O
S
T
O
R
E
V
T
R
U
S
T
33
1
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
2
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
20
1
5
5
0
4
0
0
0
3
0
1
0
R
O
M
A
N
W
P
E
L
O
Q
U
I
N
21
3
N
E
W
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
21
1
5
5
0
4
0
0
0
3
1
5
0
K
A
T
H
L
E
E
N
A
S
T
E
R
R
I
K
E
R
20
7
N
E
W
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
22
1
5
5
0
4
0
0
0
3
1
5
1
R
O
B
E
R
T
&
J
U
D
I
T
H
R
A
S
M
U
S
S
E
N
20
1
N
E
W
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
2
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
23
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
1
4
0
6
0
J
A
C
O
B
J
G
A
N
G
E
L
H
O
F
F
40
6
B
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
RE
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
N
O
N
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
K:
\
0
2
5
9
6
-
1
0
0
\
A
d
m
i
n
\
D
o
c
s
\
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
s
\
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
R
o
l
l
_
1
2
0
7
1
5
TOTAL
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
ST
R
E
E
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
N
O
N
R
E
S
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
No
I
D
E
N
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
N
O
.
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
O
W
N
E
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
M
A
I
L
I
N
G
A
S
S
E
S
S
A
B
L
E
R
A
T
E
T
O
T
A
L
F
F
R
A
T
E
T
O
T
A
L
A
S
S
E
S
S
M
E
N
T
(P
I
D
)
ADD
R
E
S
S
U
N
I
T
S
ARE
A
5
ARE
A
5
RE
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
N
O
N
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
24
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
1
4
0
3
0
S
T
P
E
T
E
R
'
S
E
V
A
L
U
T
C
H
O
F
M
O
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
41
3
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
3
5
.
9
8
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
3
,
5
9
7
.
5
0
$
1
8
,
0
9
7
.
5
0
$
25
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
1
4
0
2
0
S
T
P
E
T
E
R
'
S
E
V
A
L
U
T
C
H
O
F
M
O
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
41
9
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
6
6
.
0
2
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
,
6
0
2
.
0
0
$
6
,
6
0
2
.
0
0
$
26
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
1
4
0
1
0
D
I
A
N
E
H
E
R
B
S
T
42
5
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
27
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
1
4
1
4
0
H
E
R
A
L
D
O
&
J
A
N
R
O
D
R
I
G
U
E
Z
45
4
B
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
28
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
1
3
0
6
0
K
E
V
I
N
D
&
P
A
T
R
I
C
I
A
M
O
L
S
O
N
20
4
W
R
I
G
H
T
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
29
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
1
3
0
4
0
C
H
A
R
L
E
S
R
W
A
L
T
E
R
S
50
1
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
30
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
1
3
0
4
1
C
H
A
R
L
E
S
R
W
A
L
T
E
R
S
50
1
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
31
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
1
3
0
4
2
B
R
U
C
E
G
W
A
L
T
E
R
S
50
7
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
32
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
1
3
0
2
0
P
A
T
R
I
C
I
A
A
P
E
T
E
R
S
O
N
51
3
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
33
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
1
3
0
1
1
C
E
C
I
L
I
A
B
A
N
Y
A
I
21
3
R
A
M
S
E
Y
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
34
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
1
3
0
1
0
M
A
R
K
R
&
L
E
E
A
N
N
Z
E
I
P
E
L
T
54
8
B
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
35
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
1
2
0
6
0
T
R
O
Y
L
P
A
L
A
S
60
6
B
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
36
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
1
2
0
3
0
S
U
S
A
N
M
M
I
S
N
E
R
60
7
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
2
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
37
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
1
2
0
1
0
S
H
E
L
T
E
R
F
R
T
H
E
S
T
O
R
M
P
R
O
P
L
L
C
62
5
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
1
9
8
.
7
4
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
9
,
8
7
4
.
0
0
$
1
9
,
8
7
4
.
0
0
$
38
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
1
2
1
3
0
E
L
D
O
N
L
&
E
R
N
A
D
A
N
I
E
L
S
64
2
B
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
39
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
1
1
1
0
0
K
E
V
I
N
D
&
P
A
T
R
I
C
I
A
M
O
L
S
O
N
70
0
B
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
40
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
1
1
1
2
0
C
H
A
M
P
I
O
N
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
L
L
C
70
5
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
1
9
9
.
0
4
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
9
,
9
0
4
.
0
0
$
1
9
,
9
0
4
.
0
0
$
41
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
1
1
1
4
0
T
A
N
Y
A
T
U
I
L
&
R
O
S
E
T
U
I
L
71
5
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
42
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
1
1
0
1
0
B
E
N
J
A
M
I
N
J
K
R
O
L
L
20
9
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
43
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
1
1
0
3
0
D
A
R
R
E
N
&
L
I
S
A
K
L
A
T
T
74
2
B
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
44
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
2
0
6
0
W
I
D
E
L
L
R
E
A
L
E
S
T
A
T
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
30
1
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
3
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
1
3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
45
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
2
0
6
1
F
R
A
N
K
P
&
G
I
N
A
G
R
A
M
A
C
C
I
O
T
T
I
30
7
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
2
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
46
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
2
0
1
0
W
A
D
E
&
D
E
B
O
R
A
K
L
I
C
K
71
9
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
1
8
9
.
5
2
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
8
,
9
5
2
.
0
0
$
1
8
,
9
5
2
.
0
0
$
47
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
2
0
3
0
G
R
E
T
C
H
E
N
E
O
L
S
E
N
71
1
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
48
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
2
0
4
0
T
E
D
W
&
S
H
A
N
N
O
N
K
D
A
N
I
E
L
S
70
1
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
49
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
2
0
5
0
G
A
R
Y
M
B
R
A
N
T
70
0
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
50
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
3
0
1
0
R
E
B
E
C
C
A
A
B
I
L
L
M
Y
E
R
61
9
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
51
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
3
0
3
0
P
A
U
L
A
L
B
R
E
C
H
T
61
7
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
K:
\
0
2
5
9
6
-
1
0
0
\
A
d
m
i
n
\
D
o
c
s
\
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
s
\
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
R
o
l
l
_
1
2
0
7
1
5
TOTAL
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
ST
R
E
E
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
N
O
N
R
E
S
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
No
I
D
E
N
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
N
O
.
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
O
W
N
E
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
M
A
I
L
I
N
G
A
S
S
E
S
S
A
B
L
E
R
A
T
E
T
O
T
A
L
F
F
R
A
T
E
T
O
T
A
L
A
S
S
E
S
S
M
E
N
T
(P
I
D
)
ADD
R
E
S
S
U
N
I
T
S
ARE
A
5
ARE
A
5
RE
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
N
O
N
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
52
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
3
0
4
0
M
A
R
I
O
L
F
L
O
R
E
S
60
7
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
53
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
3
0
5
0
W
A
Y
N
E
A
L
A
B
R
E
E
&
C
O
L
E
E
N
L
E
U
D
K
E
31
6
R
A
M
S
E
Y
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
54
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
3
0
9
0
L
U
C
I
L
L
E
M
A
R
Y
S
M
I
T
H
62
2
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
55
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
3
0
8
0
R
Y
A
N
M
&
S
H
E
R
R
Y
K
K
E
M
M
E
T
M
U
E
L
L
E
R
61
2
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
56
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
3
0
7
0
D
U
A
N
E
A
&
D
I
A
N
N
F
D
A
H
L
G
R
E
N
60
6
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
57
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
3
0
6
0
S
A
L
L
Y
A
B
O
O
T
H
60
0
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
58
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
4
1
0
0
T
H
E
O
D
O
R
E
H
&
E
L
A
I
N
E
C
F
A
R
N
A
M
52
4
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
59
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
4
0
9
0
J
O
H
N
O
O
L
S
O
N
51
2
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
60
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
4
0
6
0
J
O
H
N
O
O
L
S
O
N
51
2
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
2
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
61
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
4
0
1
1
J
O
S
E
P
H
A
&
S
U
Z
A
N
N
E
C
O
T
T
E
N
31
3
R
A
M
S
E
Y
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
62
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
4
0
3
0
S
A
R
A
H
B
B
A
R
R
E
T
T
52
1
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
63
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
4
0
1
0
T
H
E
O
D
O
R
E
W
N
E
L
S
O
N
50
1
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
2
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
64
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
5
0
1
0
N
O
R
T
H
L
A
N
D
B
A
P
T
I
S
T
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
I
O
N
41
9
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
1
9
8
.
3
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
9
,
8
2
9
.
5
0
$
1
9
,
8
2
9
.
5
0
$
65
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
5
0
9
1
N
O
R
T
H
L
A
N
D
B
A
P
T
I
S
T
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
I
O
N
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
1
2
.
5
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$
66
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
5
0
3
0
E
L
D
O
R
&
N
A
N
C
Y
J
O
R
D
A
N
41
3
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
67
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
5
0
4
0
D
A
N
I
E
L
J
F
A
R
N
I
C
K
&
J
B
E
C
K
L
U
N
D
40
7
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
68
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
5
0
5
0
D
A
R
R
E
N
M
C
A
R
S
T
E
N
S
40
1
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
69
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
5
1
0
0
D
O
N
A
L
D
K
K
L
E
I
N
42
4
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
70
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
5
0
9
0
B
E
N
J
A
M
I
N
R
&
R
O
S
E
T
J
A
M
E
S
41
2
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
71
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
5
0
7
0
B
A
R
B
A
R
A
S
L
I
N
D
E
N
F
E
L
S
E
R
40
6
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
72
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
5
0
6
0
S
T
E
V
E
N
W
&
J
E
N
N
I
F
E
R
A
V
A
N
D
Y
K
E
40
0
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
73
1
5
5
0
4
0
0
0
4
0
5
0
L
E
E
M
O
S
H
I
E
R
34
2
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
74
1
5
5
0
4
0
0
0
4
0
4
0
C
O
R
R
I
N
E
S
M
O
H
R
M
A
N
33
6
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
75
1
5
5
0
4
0
0
0
4
0
3
0
M
E
R
R
I
J
O
B
N
E
S
L
A
N
D
33
0
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
76
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
7
0
0
6
0
M
E
R
R
I
J
O
B
N
E
S
L
A
N
D
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
77
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
5
0
6
0
M
E
R
R
I
J
O
B
N
E
S
L
A
N
D
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
78
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
5
0
7
0
M
E
R
L
E
H
A
R
N
O
L
D
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
79
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
5
0
8
0
D
A
I
N
V
E
S
T
M
E
N
T
S
L
L
C
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
K:
\
0
2
5
9
6
-
1
0
0
\
A
d
m
i
n
\
D
o
c
s
\
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
s
\
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
R
o
l
l
_
1
2
0
7
1
5
TOTAL
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
ST
R
E
E
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
N
O
N
R
E
S
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
No
I
D
E
N
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
N
O
.
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
O
W
N
E
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
M
A
I
L
I
N
G
A
S
S
E
S
S
A
B
L
E
R
A
T
E
T
O
T
A
L
F
F
R
A
T
E
T
O
T
A
L
A
S
S
E
S
S
M
E
N
T
(P
I
D
)
ADD
R
E
S
S
U
N
I
T
S
ARE
A
5
ARE
A
5
RE
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
N
O
N
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
80
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
7
0
0
7
0
K
A
R
I
S
S
A
W
O
L
F
31
8
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
81
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
7
0
0
9
0
C
R
A
I
G
T
Z
A
C
H
M
A
N
30
6
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
82
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
7
0
1
0
0
L
O
R
I
A
F
O
E
C
K
E
30
0
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
83
1
5
5
0
4
0
0
0
4
0
1
0
T
H
O
M
A
S
J
&
K
R
I
S
T
Y
L
B
R
I
O
N
33
9
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
84
1
5
5
0
4
0
0
0
4
0
2
0
T
O
D
D
A
&
S
T
A
C
Y
A
B
R
U
S
K
A
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
85
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
5
0
9
0
T
O
D
D
A
&
S
T
A
C
Y
A
B
R
U
S
K
A
33
1
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
86
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
5
0
5
0
R
I
C
H
A
R
D
&
M
O
N
A
C
H
I
G
H
S
M
I
T
H
32
5
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
87
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
5
0
3
1
J
A
M
E
S
K
&
L
Y
N
N
E
T
B
H
A
N
A
W
A
L
T
31
9
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
88
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
5
0
3
0
S
A
M
U
E
L
D
&
S
A
R
A
K
S
M
U
D
E
R
31
3
E
4
T
H
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
89
1
5
5
U
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
90
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
5
0
2
0
R
O
N
A
L
D
E
K
O
H
O
R
S
T
R
E
V
L
I
V
T
R
U
S
T
30
7
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
91
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
7
0
0
2
0
R
O
N
A
L
D
E
K
O
H
O
R
S
T
R
E
V
L
I
V
T
R
U
S
T
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
92
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
7
0
0
1
0
Z
A
C
H
A
R
I
A
H
M
C
O
N
W
A
Y
30
3
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
93
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
5
0
1
2
Z
A
C
H
A
R
I
A
H
M
C
O
N
W
A
Y
30
1
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
2
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
94
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
7
1
0
5
0
W
E
N
D
I
A
S
T
A
N
G
22
5
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
95
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
6
0
5
0
W
E
N
D
I
A
S
T
A
N
G
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
96
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
7
1
0
4
0
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
K
L
E
I
N
21
9
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
97
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
7
1
0
3
0
K
E
N
N
E
T
H
E
R
I
C
K
S
O
N
&
B
R
U
C
E
E
R
I
C
K
S
O
N
21
3
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
98
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
7
1
0
2
0
D
O
N
A
L
D
N
&
R
U
T
H
Y
E
R
I
C
K
S
O
N
20
7
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
99
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
7
1
0
1
0
S
H
E
L
L
Y
P
A
C
K
A
R
D
20
1
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
10
0
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
7
1
0
6
0
R
O
B
E
R
T
J
&
P
A
T
R
I
C
I
A
M
O
L
S
O
N
22
4
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
2
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
10
1
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
7
1
0
8
0
R
O
B
E
R
T
J
&
P
A
T
R
I
C
I
A
M
O
L
S
O
N
21
2
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
10
2
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
7
1
0
9
0
C
E
D
A
R
C
O
U
R
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
S
L
L
C
30
5
C
E
D
A
R
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
0-
$
2
1
3
.
8
9
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
1
,
3
8
8
.
5
0
$
2
1
,
3
8
8
.
5
0
$
10
3
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
3
3
0
6
0
Q
I
A
O
J
I
A
N
G
12
4
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
10
4
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
3
3
0
7
0
D
A
V
I
D
N
S
P
E
N
C
E
&
N
A
N
C
Y
S
C
H
E
R
B
E
R
11
2
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
10
5
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
3
3
0
9
0
P
A
T
R
I
C
I
A
A
S
C
H
U
L
E
R
10
6
3
R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
10
6
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
3
3
0
4
1
D
A
R
R
I
N
F
L
A
H
R
&
C
A
R
R
I
E
L
Y
N
C
H
12
5
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
10
7
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
3
3
0
4
0
B
R
I
A
N
A
&
T
E
R
E
S
A
L
K
I
T
E
11
9
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
10
8
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
3
3
0
3
0
R
I
C
H
A
R
D
&
M
A
R
Y
J
O
Q
U
I
C
K
11
3
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
K:
\
0
2
5
9
6
-
1
0
0
\
A
d
m
i
n
\
D
o
c
s
\
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
s
\
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
R
o
l
l
_
1
2
0
7
1
5
TOTAL
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
ST
R
E
E
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
N
O
N
R
E
S
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
No
I
D
E
N
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
N
O
.
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
O
W
N
E
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
M
A
I
L
I
N
G
A
S
S
E
S
S
A
B
L
E
R
A
T
E
T
O
T
A
L
F
F
R
A
T
E
T
O
T
A
L
A
S
S
E
S
S
M
E
N
T
(P
I
D
)
ADD
R
E
S
S
U
N
I
T
S
ARE
A
5
ARE
A
5
RE
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
N
O
N
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
10
9
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
3
3
0
1
1
B
R
I
D
G
E
W
A
T
E
R
T
E
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
C
O
31
6
P
I
N
E
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
1
3
2
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
3
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
3
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$
11
0
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
1
6
1
0
0
F
I
R
S
T
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
B
A
N
K
N
A
10
6
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
5
6
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
5
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
5
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
11
1
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
1
6
0
9
0
F
I
R
S
T
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
B
A
N
K
N
A
10
6
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
6
6
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
11
2
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
1
6
0
8
0
F
I
R
S
T
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
B
A
N
K
N
A
11
2
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
6
6
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
11
3
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
1
6
0
8
0
F
I
R
S
T
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
B
A
N
K
N
A
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
11
4
1
1
5
0
1
0
0
1
6
0
7
0
F
I
R
S
T
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
B
A
N
K
N
A
11
8
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
6
6
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
11
5
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
1
6
0
7
0
F
I
R
S
T
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
B
A
N
K
N
A
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
11
6
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
1
6
0
6
0
R
O
N
A
L
D
I
&
A
G
N
E
S
H
M
I
C
H
A
E
L
I
S
12
4
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
11
7
1
1
5
0
1
9
0
1
6
0
5
0
R
O
N
A
L
D
I
&
A
G
N
E
S
H
M
I
C
H
A
E
L
I
S
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
11
8
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
1
6
0
5
1
D
J
'
S
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
4,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
8
3
.
3
8
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
0
,
5
8
9
.
2
6
$
1
0
,
5
8
9
.
2
6
$
11
9
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
7
2
1
0
0
C
I
T
Y
O
F
M
O
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
4,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
12
0
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
7
0
9
0
C
E
D
A
R
C
R
E
S
T
A
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
S
L
P
40
6
C
E
D
A
R
S
T
S
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
2
9
5
.
5
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
9
,
5
5
0
.
0
0
$
2
9
,
5
5
0
.
0
0
$
12
1
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
7
0
4
0
D
E
B
R
A
E
A
C
K
E
R
M
A
N
21
2
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
12
2
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
7
0
7
0
R
E
N
E
E
A
O
L
S
O
N
21
8
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
12
3
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
7
0
5
0
M
A
R
I
E
J
A
M
I
S
O
N
&
R
A
Y
M
O
N
D
F
U
L
L
E
R
22
4
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
12
4
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
8
0
1
0
G
E
O
R
G
E
E
&
M
A
U
R
E
E
N
L
A
R
S
O
N
30
0
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
12
5
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
8
0
2
0
W
A
Y
N
E
A
&
S
A
N
D
R
A
M
C
O
X
30
6
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
12
6
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
8
0
3
0
R
U
S
S
E
L
L
C
&
S
A
N
D
R
A
L
O
L
S
O
N
31
8
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
12
7
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
8
0
7
0
R
U
S
S
E
L
L
C
&
S
A
N
D
R
A
L
O
L
S
O
N
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
12
8
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
8
0
6
0
N
A
T
H
A
N
J
W
O
L
D
33
0
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
12
9
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
8
0
5
0
R
I
C
H
A
R
D
L
S
R
&
S
A
R
A
H
R
M
A
R
T
I
E
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
13
0
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
8
0
8
0
R
I
C
H
A
R
D
L
S
R
&
S
A
R
A
H
R
M
A
R
T
I
E
33
6
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
13
1
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
9
0
1
1
R
I
C
H
A
R
D
L
S
R
&
S
A
R
A
H
R
M
A
R
T
I
E
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
13
2
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
9
0
5
0
G
R
E
G
W
M
A
R
S
H
A
L
L
34
2
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
13
3
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
6
0
5
0
G
R
E
G
W
M
A
R
S
H
A
L
L
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
13
4
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
9
0
1
0
D
O
R
O
T
H
Y
M
A
R
T
I
E
&
R
I
C
H
A
R
D
M
A
R
T
I
E
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
13
5
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
6
0
5
1
R
I
C
H
A
R
D
A
&
J
A
N
E
L
L
E
A
I
A
N
O
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
13
6
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
6
0
6
0
R
I
C
H
A
R
D
A
&
J
A
N
E
L
L
E
A
I
A
N
O
41
2
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
K:
\
0
2
5
9
6
-
1
0
0
\
A
d
m
i
n
\
D
o
c
s
\
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
s
\
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
R
o
l
l
_
1
2
0
7
1
5
TOTAL
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
ST
R
E
E
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
N
O
N
R
E
S
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
No
I
D
E
N
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
N
O
.
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
O
W
N
E
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
M
A
I
L
I
N
G
A
S
S
E
S
S
A
B
L
E
R
A
T
E
T
O
T
A
L
F
F
R
A
T
E
T
O
T
A
L
A
S
S
E
S
S
M
E
N
T
(P
I
D
)
ADD
R
E
S
S
U
N
I
T
S
ARE
A
5
ARE
A
5
RE
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
N
O
N
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
13
7
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
9
0
4
0
R
I
C
H
A
R
D
A
&
J
A
N
E
L
L
E
A
I
A
N
O
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
13
8
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
9
0
2
0
R
I
C
H
A
R
D
A
&
J
A
N
E
L
L
E
A
I
A
N
O
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
13
9
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
6
0
5
2
T
O
R
I
A
S
H
O
W
A
L
T
E
R
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
14
0
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
9
0
3
1
T
O
R
I
A
S
H
O
W
A
L
T
E
R
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
14
1
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
6
0
4
0
T
O
R
I
A
S
H
O
W
A
L
T
E
R
41
8
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
14
2
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
6
0
3
0
R
Y
A
N
N
E
E
P
O
C
I
42
4
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
14
3
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
6
0
1
0
A
L
I
C
E
K
L
A
T
T
43
6
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
14
4
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
7
0
1
0
C
I
T
Y
O
F
M
O
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
40
5
R
A
M
S
E
Y
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
4,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
5
7
7
.
6
5
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
5
7
,
7
6
4
.
5
0
$
5
7
,
7
6
4
.
5
0
$
14
5
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
8
0
6
0
L
U
E
L
L
A
P
L
A
B
R
E
E
&
K
E
V
I
N
C
S
T
U
M
P
F
60
4
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
14
6
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
8
0
6
1
J
A
S
O
N
A
H
O
R
S
T
&
T
A
N
Y
A
J
N
E
L
S
O
N
40
6
R
A
M
S
E
Y
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
14
7
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
8
0
3
0
C
H
A
R
L
E
S
E
F
I
N
C
H
41
2
R
A
M
S
E
Y
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
14
8
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
8
0
3
1
A
N
T
H
O
N
Y
J
P
A
V
L
I
N
41
4
R
A
M
S
E
Y
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
14
9
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
8
0
3
2
M
A
R
K
W
&
R
E
B
E
C
C
A
L
M
O
N
G
E
O
N
41
6
R
A
M
S
E
Y
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
15
0
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
8
0
8
1
J
O
H
N
D
B
E
L
D
E
&
J
A
N
E
Y
M
W
O
O
D
-
B
E
L
D
E
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
15
1
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
8
0
8
0
J
O
H
N
D
B
E
L
D
E
&
J
A
N
E
Y
M
W
O
O
D
-
B
E
L
D
E
61
8
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
15
2
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
8
0
8
2
J
O
H
N
D
B
E
L
D
E
&
J
A
N
E
Y
M
W
O
O
D
-
B
E
L
D
E
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
15
3
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
8
0
2
0
R
O
B
E
R
T
L
&
B
E
V
E
R
L
Y
J
W
E
I
M
A
N
62
4
4
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
15
4
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
8
0
1
0
J
E
F
F
R
E
Y
E
&
J
O
A
N
C
M
I
C
H
A
E
L
I
S
63
0
E
4
T
H
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
15
5
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
9
0
1
1
C
I
T
Y
O
F
M
O
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
4,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
15
6
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
3
9
0
1
0
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
M
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
H
E
A
L
T
H
C
T
R
A
T
T
N
:
D
40
7
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
4,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
3
8
1
.
0
6
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
8
,
1
0
5
.
5
0
$
3
8
,
1
0
5
.
5
0
$
15
7
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
2
6
0
1
0
I
N
D
E
P
E
N
D
E
N
T
S
C
H
O
O
L
D
I
S
T
8
8
2
30
2
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
4,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
1
0
4
8
.
2
4
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
0
4
,
8
2
4
.
0
0
$
1
0
4
,
8
2
4
.
0
0
$
15
8
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
4
3
0
5
0
G
A
R
D
N
E
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
60
7
7
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
4,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
1
6
1
.
9
6
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
6
,
1
9
6
.
0
0
$
1
6
,
1
9
6
.
0
0
$
15
9
1
5
5
0
1
5
0
4
3
0
6
0
R
O
B
E
R
T
D
&
M
A
R
J
O
R
I
E
L
S
C
H
U
M
A
C
H
E
R
50
8
R
A
M
S
E
Y
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
16
0
1
5
5
0
4
1
0
0
1
0
5
0
F
R
A
N
C
I
S
J
H
I
C
K
E
Y
4,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
8
3
.
3
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
8
,
3
3
0
.
0
0
$
8
,
3
3
0
.
0
0
$
16
1
1
5
5
0
4
1
0
0
1
0
5
0
F
R
A
N
C
I
S
J
H
I
C
K
E
Y
4,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
8
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
8
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
8
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
16
2
1
5
5
0
4
7
0
0
0
0
4
0
F
R
A
N
C
O
N
I
A
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
S
L
L
C
51
7
R
A
M
S
E
Y
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
4,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
7
7
.
1
1
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
7
,
7
1
1
.
0
0
$
7
,
7
1
1
.
0
0
$
16
3
1
5
5
0
2
9
0
0
0
0
1
1
F
R
A
N
C
O
N
I
A
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
S
L
L
C
51
7
RA
M
S
E
Y
ST
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
4,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
8
5
.
6
3
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
8
,
5
6
3
.
0
0
$
8
,
5
6
3
.
0
0
$
16
4
1
5
5
0
4
7
0
0
0
0
1
0
F
R
A
N
C
O
N
I
A
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
S
L
L
C
51
8
W
R
I
G
H
T
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
4,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
1
6
5
.
2
2
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
6
,
5
2
2
.
0
0
$
1
6
,
5
2
2
.
0
0
$
16
5
1
5
5
0
4
1
0
0
1
0
3
0
W
R
I
G
H
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
L
L
C
51
0
W
R
I
G
H
T
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
4,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
8
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
8
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
8
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
K:
\
0
2
5
9
6
-
1
0
0
\
A
d
m
i
n
\
D
o
c
s
\
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
s
\
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
R
o
l
l
_
1
2
0
7
1
5
TOTAL
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
ST
R
E
E
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
N
O
N
R
E
S
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
No
I
D
E
N
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
N
O
.
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
O
W
N
E
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
M
A
I
L
I
N
G
A
S
S
E
S
S
A
B
L
E
R
A
T
E
T
O
T
A
L
F
F
R
A
T
E
T
O
T
A
L
A
S
S
E
S
S
M
E
N
T
(P
I
D
)
ADD
R
E
S
S
U
N
I
T
S
ARE
A
5
ARE
A
5
RE
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
N
O
N
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
16
6
1
5
5
0
4
1
0
0
1
0
4
0
W
R
I
G
H
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
L
L
C
50
2
W
R
I
G
H
T
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
4,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
8
5
.
9
2
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
8
,
5
9
2
.
0
0
$
8
,
5
9
2
.
0
0
$
16
7
1
5
5
0
9
9
0
0
1
0
2
0
M
A
R
J
O
R
I
E
A
G
R
A
B
O
W
S
K
I
50
3
W
R
I
G
H
T
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
16
8
1
5
5
0
9
9
0
0
1
0
3
0
B
E
T
T
Y
F
M
C
I
N
T
O
S
H
I
R
R
E
V
T
R
U
S
T
50
5
W
R
I
G
H
T
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
16
9
1
5
5
0
9
9
0
0
1
0
4
0
G
O
R
D
O
N
A
N
D
E
R
S
O
N
50
7
W
R
I
G
H
T
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
17
0
1
5
5
0
9
9
0
0
1
0
5
0
C
A
R
O
L
A
P
E
T
E
R
S
O
N
R
E
V
O
C
A
B
L
E
T
R
50
9
W
R
I
G
H
T
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
17
1
1
5
5
0
9
9
0
0
1
0
6
0
L
O
W
E
L
L
G
&
P
A
T
R
I
C
I
A
W
M
O
R
T
E
N
S
E
N
51
1
W
R
I
G
H
T
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
17
2
1
5
5
0
9
9
0
0
1
0
7
0
G
R
E
T
C
H
E
N
A
S
C
H
U
E
L
L
E
R
51
3
W
R
I
G
H
T
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
17
3
1
5
5
0
9
9
0
0
1
0
1
0
H
I
L
L
S
I
D
E
T
O
W
N
H
O
M
E
S
A
S
S
O
C
M
O
N
T
I
4,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
17
4
1
5
5
0
2
9
0
0
1
0
1
0
H
I
L
L
S
I
D
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
20
7
7
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
4,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
6
7
.
5
4
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
,
7
5
3
.
7
5
$
6
,
7
5
3
.
7
5
$
17
5
1
5
5
5
0
0
1
1
4
2
0
1
H
I
L
L
S
I
D
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
54
2
C
E
D
A
R
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
4,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4
7
5
.
9
9
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
7
,
5
9
9
.
0
0
$
4
7
,
5
9
9
.
0
0
$
17
6
1
5
5
5
0
0
1
1
4
2
0
3
B
U
R
L
I
N
G
T
O
N
N
O
R
T
H
E
R
N
&
S
A
N
T
A
F
E
R
A
I
L
W
4,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
17
7
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
1
5
0
7
0
D
F
/
S
S
S
L
L
C
3R
D
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
4,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
2
4
3
.
6
5
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
8
,
8
1
8
.
5
4
$
2
8
,
8
1
8
.
5
4
$
17
8
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
1
5
0
1
0
D
F
/
S
S
S
L
L
C
50
8
P
I
N
E
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
4,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
1
5
1
.
9
4
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
5
,
1
9
4
.
0
0
$
1
5
,
1
9
4
.
0
0
$
17
9
1
5
5
0
1
9
0
0
4
0
1
0
H
I
L
L
S
I
D
E
C
E
M
E
T
E
R
Y
4,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
18
0
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
0
4
0
1
0
H
I
L
L
S
I
D
E
C
E
M
E
T
E
R
Y
4,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
-
$
18
1
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
0
3
0
1
0
D
E
L
R
E
Y
M
O
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
S
70
0
P
I
N
E
S
T
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
4,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
2
,
3
5
3
.
8
3
$
2
2
,
3
5
3
.
8
3
$
18
2
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
0
3
0
6
0
B
O
R
D
E
R
F
O
O
D
S
I
N
C
12
4
7
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
4,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
8
,
3
8
5
.
3
9
$
8
,
3
8
5
.
3
9
$
18
3
1
5
5
0
1
0
0
0
3
0
4
0
P
U
R
A
M
L
L
C
11
8
7
T
H
S
T
E
MO
N
T
I
C
E
L
L
O
5
5
3
6
2
4,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
0
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
2
,
3
1
9
.
2
8
$
1
2
,
3
1
9
.
2
8
$
12
0
5
4
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
,
8
4
3
.
8
1
7
3
8
,
5
8
9
.
4
2
$
1,278,589.42$
K:
\
0
2
5
9
6
-
1
0
0
\
A
d
m
i
n
\
D
o
c
s
\
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
s
\
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
R
o
l
l
_
1
2
0
7
1
5
)x
157
144
175
180
177
11
156181
174
120
124
183
173
4
24
60 36
9
6
142
158
143
126
109
159
40
37
63
64
54
43
34
130
46
80
61
182
1 2 3
44
178 58
32
23
35
38
20
70
51 50
19
102
100
5
62
29
12
69
49
104
45
136
33
153
41
131
18
8
72
154
179
28
74
27
39
25 2673
67 66
71
53 52
4748
57 56 55
13 14
99 98 97 82 81
87 86
96
103
88
42
166
160
68
83
132
147
164
10
161
165
94
90
145
75
146
15
7
85
138
22
93
31
162
21
92
76
125
123
141
106
111
118
129
151
128127121
122121
112
105
108 101
110
155
107
114
84
59
149
148
16
116
150
163
117
139
176 65
78
134
152
91 77
115 95
133
167
171
169
168
172
170
30
135
119 79113
140
137
17
94
7TH
3RD
4TH
RIVER
PINE
BROADWAY
CEDAR
NEW
RAMSEY
6TH
WASHINGTON
WALNUT
WRIGHT
HENNEPIN
WB I94 TO PINE ST
FALLON
PALM
PINE ST TO EB I94
TERRITORIAL
94
PALM
Docum
ent Path: K:\02596-100\GIS\Maps\StReconProject_Assessm
entMap_Revised11.13.15.m
xd
Ü
Street Reconstruction Assessment MapMonticello, MN
Reconstruction Streets
LandUse
MultiFamily
Municipal
Non-Residential
Residential
0 500250 Feet
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100
APPENDIX D
Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
Radar Survey of Hillside Cemetery
CONSULTANTS
• ENVIRONMENTAL
• GEOTECHNICAL
• MATERIALS
• FORENSICS
www.amengtest.com
REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL
EXPLORATION AND REVIEW
2016 Street Improvements
Monticello, Minnesota
AET Report No. 26-01024
Date:
December 4, 2015
Prepared for:
City of Monticello
c/o WSB & Associates
701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Page i
550 Cleveland Avenue North | Saint Paul, MN 55114
Phone (651) 659-9001 | (800) 972-6364 | Fax (651) 659-1379 | www.amengtest.com | AA/EEO
This document shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval from American Engineering Testing, Inc.
CONSULTANTS
• ENVIRONMENTAL
• GEOTECHNICAL
• MATERIALS
• FORENSICS
December 4, 2015
City of Monticello
c/o WSB & Associates
701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Attn: Mr. Eric Eckman, PE
RE: Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
2016 Street Improvements
Monticello, Minnesota
AET Report No. 26-01024
Dear Mr. Eckman:
American Engineering Testing, Inc. (AET) is pleased to present the results of our subsurface
exploration program and geotechnical engineering review for 2016 Street Improvements project
in Monticello, Minnesota. These services were performed according to our proposal to you dated
August 24, 2015.
We are submitting one electronic copy of the report to you. Additional copies can be provided
upon request.
Please contact me if you have any questions about the report.
Sincerely,
American Engineering Testing, Inc.
Megan J. L. Hoppe, PE
Senior Geotechnical Engineer
Phone: (612) 685-6432
mhoppe@amengtest.com
Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
2016 Street Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN
December 4, 2015 ENGINEERING
AET Report No. 26-01024 TESTING, INC.
Copyright 2015 American Engineering Testing, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Unauthorized use or copying of this document is strictly prohibited by anyone other than the client for the specific project.
Page ii
SIGNATURE PAGE
Prepared for: Prepared by:
City of Monticello American Engineering Testing, Inc.
c/o WSB & Associates 550 Cleveland Avenue North
701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 St. Paul, Minnesota 55114
Minneapolis, MN 55416 (651) 659-9001/www.amengtest.com
Attn: Mr. Eric Eckman, PE
Authored by: Reviewed by:
Megan J. L. Hoppe, PE Melanie Fiegen, PE
Senior Geotechnical Engineer Pavement Engineer
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Professional Engineer under Minnesota Statute
Section 326.02 to 326.15
Date: December 4, 2015 License #: 49905
Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
2016 Street Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN
December 4, 2015 ENGINEERING
AET Report No. 26-01024 TESTING, INC.
Page iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Transmittal Letter............................................................................................................................. i
Signature Page ................................................................................................................................ ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................... iii
1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES ............................................................................................................ 1
3.0 PROJECT INFORMATION ..................................................................................................... 2
4.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND TESTING ................................................................ 3
4.1 Field Exploration Program .................................................................................................... 3
4.2 Laboratory Testing ................................................................................................................ 4
5.0 SITE CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................. 4
5.1 Existing Pavement Section .................................................................................................... 4
5.2 Pavement Subgrade Soils ...................................................................................................... 5
5.3 Underlying Soils .................................................................................................................... 5
5.4 Groundwater .......................................................................................................................... 5
5.5 Summary ................................................................................................................................ 6
6.0 Pavement improvement methods .............................................................................................. 7
6.1 Full Reconstruction................................................................................................................ 7
6.2 Partial Reconstruction............................................................................................................ 7
6.3 Resurfacing ............................................................................................................................ 8
6.4 Mill and Overlay .................................................................................................................... 8
6.5 Reclamation ........................................................................................................................... 8
6.6 Recommended Approach ...................................................................................................... 9
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................................ 10
7.1 Definitions ........................................................................................................................... 10
7.2 Subgrade Preparation-Full and Partial Reconstruction ....................................................... 11
7.3 Reclamation ......................................................................................................................... 13
7.4 Mill & Overlay .................................................................................................................... 14
7.5 Design R-Value ................................................................................................................... 15
7.6 Pavement Thickness Designs .............................................................................................. 15
7.7 Utility Support, Bedding, and Backfilling ........................................................................... 17
8.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS .............................................................................. 17
8.1 Potential Difficulties ............................................................................................................ 17
8.2 Excavation Backsloping ...................................................................................................... 19
8.3 Observation and Testing ...................................................................................................... 19
9.0 LIMITATIONS ....................................................................................................................... 19
Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
2016 Street Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN
December 4, 2015 ENGINEERING
AET Report No. 26-01024 TESTING, INC.
Page iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
STANDARD SHEETS - Bituminous Overlay Milling and Preparation
Bedding/Foundation Support of Buried Pipe
Utility Excavation Backfilling
APPENDIX A – Geotechnical Field Exploration and Testing
Boring Log Notes
AASHTO Soil Classification System
Unified Soil Classification System
Figure 1 - Boring Locations
Subsurface Boring Logs
Gradation Curves
APPENDIX B – Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use
Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
2016 Street Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN
December 4, 2015 ENGINEERING
AET Report No. 26-01024 TESTING, INC.
Page 1 of 19
1.0 INTRODUCTION
A number of street segments are proposed for rehabilitation or reconstruction in 2016 within the
City of Monticello, Minnesota. To assist in planning and design, you have authorized American
Engineering Testing, Inc. (AET) to conduct a subsurface exploration program at the site, conduct
soil laboratory testing, and perform a geotechnical engineering review for the project. This report
presents the results of the above services and provides our engineering recommendations based
on this data.
2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES
AET's services were performed according to our proposal to you dated August 24, 2015, which
was authorized on August 26, 2015. The authorized scope consists of performing the following:
28 standard penetration test (SPT) borings to depths ranging from 6 to 21 feet.
Soil laboratory testing.
A geotechnical engineering analysis based on the gained data and this report.
These services are intended for geotechnical purposes. The scope is not intended to explore for
the presence or extent of environmental contamination.
Borings B-2, B-4, and B-25 could not be performed due to utility conflicts. Boring B-26 had to
be terminated at 4 feet, prior to the planned depth, due to mechanical problems; we have referred
to this initial Boring B-26A. A second boring was then performed at this same location, with no
sampling in the upper 4 feet; the second boring is called B-26B. Since the location was the
same, a single location is shown on the attached Boring Location Plan (Figure 1) and labeled as
SB-26.
Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
2016 Street Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN
December 4, 2015 ENGINEERING
AET Report No. 26-01024 TESTING, INC.
Page 2 of 19
To aid in the design of turn lanes and associated retaining walls from at the northeast corner of
7th Street and TH 25, a Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) survey was performed on the Hillside
Cemetery property adjacent to these two roadways. The results of that work have been reported
separately.
3.0 PROJECT INFORMATION
The City of Monticello’s 2016 street improvement projects include the streets bounded by
Broadway Street on the north, 7th Street on the south, TH 25 (Pine Street) on the west, and
Washington Street on the east. The soil borings were placed to represent the street segments
shown in the following table.
Table A – Street and Boring Summary
Street Borings Notes
3rd Street 9, 14, 19 ADT<1500
4th Street 11, 16, 20 ADT<1500
6th Street 23 ADT<1500
7th Street 1, 5, 13, 24, 26 ADT=7900
Cedar Street 21, 22 ADT<1500
Hennepin Street 8 ADT<1500
New Street 17 ADT<1500
Palm Street 18 ADT<1500
Ramsey Street 10, 12 ADT<1500
Washington Street 6, 7 ADT=3000
Wright Street 3,15 ADT<1500
TH 25 (Pine Street) 27, 28 Turn Lanes to 7th Street
Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
2016 Street Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN
December 4, 2015 ENGINEERING
AET Report No. 26-01024 TESTING, INC.
Page 3 of 19
We understand sanitary sewer mains will be replaced along portions of 3rd Street, 4th Street, New
Street, and Ramsey Street. In addition, all sewer services will be replaced, as will water valves
and hydrants. Spot storm sewer replacements will also be performed.
Right turn lanes will be added to the north, south, and east legs of the 7 th Street and TH 25
intersection. Reconstruction of this interchange will require widening of these roadways into the
existing Hillside Cemetery property at the northeast corner of the intersection. This widening
may require construction of small retaining walls along the cemetery.
The City plans to reclaim and pave the existing streets while maintaining the existing width and
surface elevation.
The previously stated information represents our understanding of the proposed construction.
This information is an integral part of our engineering review. It is important that you contact us
if there are changes from that described so that we can evaluate whether modifications to our
recommendations are appropriate.
4.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND TESTING
4.1 Field Exploration Program
The subsurface exploration program conducted for the project consisted of 25 standard
penetration test (SPT) borings. Before drilling, we contacted Gopher State One Call to locate
public underground utilities.
The logs of the borings and details of the methods used appear in Appendix A. The logs contain
information concerning soil layering, soil classification, geologic description, and moisture
condition. Relative density or consistency is also noted for the natural soils, which is based on
the standard penetration resistance (N-value).
Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
2016 Street Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN
December 4, 2015 ENGINEERING
AET Report No. 26-01024 TESTING, INC.
Page 4 of 19
The borings were initially located in the field by AET personnel based on nearby site features;
the locations were adjusted by the AET drill crew as needed for access and to avoid utilities. The
final boring locations and surface elevations were measured by WSB and provided to us. The
surface elevations and boring location coordinates are provided on the boring logs within
Appendix A. The boring locations were also provided to us by WSB, and they are shown on
Figure 1 in Appendix A.
4.2 Laboratory Testing
The laboratory test program included water contents of cohesive soils and two sieve analysis
tests. The test results appear in Appendix A on the individual boring logs adjacent to the samples
upon which they were performed or on the data sheet following the logs. The laboratory testing
methods are described in further detail in Appendix A.
5.0 SITE CONDITIONS
5.1 Existing Pavement Section
Bituminous pavement was encountered at the surface of each of the 23 borings performed
through the existing streets. The bituminous pavement ranged from 3 to 6¼ inches thick, with an
average thickness of 5 inches.
Below the pavement, the drillers identified possible aggregate base material at nine of the boring
locations. The possible aggregate base layers were generally identified on the east/west streets
(3rd, 4th, 6th, and 7th). The thicknesses of the possible aggregate base at these nine locations
ranged from 3 to 12½ inches, with an average thickness of just over 9 inches. The possible
aggregate base material was classified as AASHTO soil types A-1-b, A-2-4, and A-2-6 (silty
sand, sand with silt, and clayey sand, each with a little gravel). Many of the identified possible
aggregate base layers contained recycled material such as pieces of bituminous and concrete.
Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
2016 Street Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN
December 4, 2015 ENGINEERING
AET Report No. 26-01024 TESTING, INC.
Page 5 of 19
5.2 Pavement Subgrade Soils
At the borings located on the north/south streets, the soil directly below the pavement could not
be differentiated, based on material and/or color differences, from the underlying subgrade soils.
Generally, the underlying subgrade soils across the site, especially those within the upper 2 to 6
feet of the surface, consist predominantly of A-2-4 and A-1-b soils (sandy soils with varying
amounts of gravel) similar to aggregate base materials. Most of the shallow (6-foot deep)
borings terminated within these coarse grained soils.
However, in some areas clayey A-6 and A-2-6 soils (typically clayey sands) were found within 6
feet of the surface. The clayey subgrade areas encountered in the borings include the following:
4th Street: Boring B-11 from ½ to 2 feet and Boring B-16 from 2 to 6½ feet,
7th Street: Boring B-24 from 4 to 6 feet, and
TH 25: Boring B-27 from 2 to 4 feet and Boring B-28 from 2 to 10 feet.
5.3 Underlying Soils
Deposits of clayey glacial till were encountered in about half of the deeper borings, at depths of
6½ to 19 feet below the surface. These soils have ASSHTO classifications of A-2-6 and A-6
(clayey sand, sandy lean clay, and lean clay with sand, each with a little gravel). In addition,
fine alluvial deposits of A-4 soils (sandy silt) were encountered below about 11½ feet in Boring
B-12; these silts were wet to waterbearing.
5.4 Groundwater
Groundwater was measured within three of the deeper borings (B-12, B-16, and B-17) at depths
of 10½ to 12½ feet below the ground surface, which correspond to groundwater elevations
ranging from about 916 to 917 feet. These levels were measured within relatively free draining
sandy or silty soils; therefore, they should provide a fairly reliable indication of the gro undwater
level at the time and location of measurement.
Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
2016 Street Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN
December 4, 2015 ENGINEERING
AET Report No. 26-01024 TESTING, INC.
Page 6 of 19
However, groundwater was also measured in Boring B-22 at a depth of 3½ feet, corresponding to
a groundwater elevation of about 927½ feet. We suspect this is a perched groundwater level.
The slow draining nature of the clayey glacial till soils found deeper in the soil profile at this site
can lead to perched groundwater above this clay layer. In addition, where clay tills overlie faster
draining silts (Boring B-12) or sands which are waterbearing, excavation bottom instability and
“blow-up” can occur if the underlying faster draining layer is under artesian pressure.
In general, ground-water levels do not remain constant. Ground-water levels fluctuate due to
varying seasonal and annual rainfall and snow melt amounts, as well as other factors.
5.5 Summary
A summary of the bituminous and aggregate base thickness, as well as subgrade soil type and
estimated design R-value are provided in the following table.
Table B – Existing Condition Summary
Street
Bituminous
Thickness
Aggregate
Base Thickness Subgrade Soil Type
Estimated Design
R-value
3rd
Street 3¼" to 6" 3" to 11½" A-1-b 30
4th
Street 5½" to 6" 0" to 12½" A-2-6, A-1-b, A-6 20
6th
Street 5" 6" A-1-b 30
7th
Street 3" to 6" 0" to 12" A-1-b, A-2-4, A-2-6 30
Cedar
Street 3¾" to 5¼" None A-2-4 30
Hennepin
Street 4½" None 2 feet of A-2-4
over A-1-b 30
New
Street 5" None 2 feet of A-2-4
over A-1-b 30
Palm
Street 5" None A-1-b (SP-SM) 30
Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
2016 Street Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN
December 4, 2015 ENGINEERING
AET Report No. 26-01024 TESTING, INC.
Page 7 of 19
Street
Bituminous
Thickness
Aggregate
Base Thickness Subgrade Soil Type
Estimated Design
R-value
Ramsey
Street 4¼" to 5" None A-2-4 & A-1-b 30
Washington
Street 5" to 6¼" None 2 to 4 feet of A-2-4
over A-1-b 30
Wright
Street 4½" to 4¾" None 2 feet of A-2-4
over A-1-b 30
TH 25 None None 2 feet of A-2-4 or A-1-b,
over A-6 & A-2-6 20
6.0 PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENT METHODS
6.1 Full Reconstruction
Full reconstruction will provide the best long-term performance for a new pavement system.
With this option, the intent is generally to improve subgrade conditions by constructing a sand
subbase layer to provide better strength, drainage, and frost heave/thaw weakening properties.
The degree of performance improvement in poor draining and/or frost susceptible soils is
generally proportional to the sand subbase thickness placed. Full reconstruction is a good option
for roadways with clay subgrade soils and where significant utility construction will take place.
6.2 Partial Reconstruction
Partial reconstruction, sometimes called remove and replace, is an approach intended to only
improve the condition of unstable areas of the existing subgrade. With this approach, it is
prudent to conduct a test roll over the exposed subgrade soils prior to aggregate base placement,
and then conduct local improvement of the observed unstable soil areas. This approach is
essentially reconstruction without the incorporation of a sand subbase; therefore, it is
reconstruction without the performance improvement that can be expected from better drainage
and reduced frost susceptibility that a sand subbase would provide. Partial reconstruction may
be a good option for roadways where minor utility construction will take place and where
problem areas are evident at the pavement surface.
Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
2016 Street Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN
December 4, 2015 ENGINEERING
AET Report No. 26-01024 TESTING, INC.
Page 8 of 19
6.3 Resurfacing
Resurfacing removes the existing bituminous, but leaves the aggregate base in-place, such that
improvement to only the aggregate base layer is possible. This option is appropriate to thin
bituminous, but it requires an adequate thickness of the existing aggregate base layer as well as a
strong subgrade, such that the aggregate base layer can actually be improved by conditioning and
compacting. The subgrade is generally strong in the project area; however, aggregate base
thicknesses appear to be variable.
6.4 Mill and Overlay
Mill and overlay removes the upper portion of the existing bituminous, but leaves the lower
portion of the bituminous in-place; therefore, improvement to the aggregate base and subgrade
layers is not possible. This approach requires a sufficient thickness of bituminous to support the
paving equipment and keep it from breaking through into the aggregate base layer. The
minimum thickness is typically considered to be 1.5 inches, although the actual required
thickness also depends on the bituminous, aggregate base, and subgrade conditions. With the
mill and overlay approach, cracks from the existing pavement will reappear i n the new surface
layer after a short period of time; these are called reflection cracks. Mill and overlay should be
avoided for those pavements which exhibit significant crack related distresses. Bituminous
thicknesses generally appear adequate for mill and overlay at this site; however, many of the
streets exhibit significant cracking.
6.5 Reclamation
Full-depth reclamation involves crushing both the bituminous and at least a portion of the
aggregate base layer in-place and blending the material with the intent of creating a recycled
aggregate base. A fresh bituminous surface is then placed over the reclaimed material. This
approach will outperform the mill and overlay approach, since reflection cracking does not
develop. However, if original grades need to be maintained, excess materials will need to be
Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
2016 Street Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN
December 4, 2015 ENGINEERING
AET Report No. 26-01024 TESTING, INC.
Page 9 of 19
removed from the site, either before or after reclamation. Methods include milling the surface
bituminous for removal prior to reclamation, or conducting the reclamation process and then
removing a portion of the reclaimed material.
Full-depth pavement reclamation can include either non-stabilized or stabilized. In stabilized
reclamation, emulsified asphalt is added to the reclaimed material, which stabilizes and improves
the reclaimed aggregate base and allows for thinner bituminous surfacing. These processes
require that appropriate material types and thicknesses be in-place. These methods also require
pavement cores and larger, more representative samples of aggregate base be collected for proper
evaluation and design.
Based on the currently available information, reclamation for this project is likely to be limited to
milling and removing the existing bituminous surfaces as well as removing the existing
aggregate base, where present, for blending outside the existing roadbed to create a recycled
aggregate base material.
6.6 Recommended Approach
Based on the subsurface conditions encountered and the potential for utility construction along
4th Street, we recommend reconstruction for this roadway, which incorporates a sand subbase
layer over the clayey subgrade to improve the frost and drainage characteristics of the system.
We also recommend the new turn lanes along TH 25 be constructed using a sand subbase layer.
Based on the current street condition, a mill and overlay may be an appropriate option for the
portion of 7th Street between Cedar Street and Ramsey Street. Three borings along this stretch
indicated 5½ to 6 inches of bituminous. Although an aggregate base was not clearly found in
Boring B-24, this boring indicates A-1-b material is present to 4 feet, and the sieve analysis
conducted on the sample from ½ to 2 feet indicates this material nearly meets the gradation
Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
2016 Street Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN
December 4, 2015 ENGINEERING
AET Report No. 26-01024 TESTING, INC.
Page 10 of 19
requirements for Class 5. The other two borings indicate 11½ to 12 inches of aggregate base and
A-1-b soils to depths of 6 feet.
For the remaining streets, options will depend on the level of utility construction. Reflective
cracking is likely to be an issue if a mill and overlay procedure is used. In addition, aggregate
base thicknesses are variable or not present; therefore, it is our opinion that resurfacing is
generally not the best option. We recommend the other street segments be rehabilitated using the
partial reconstruction (remove and replace) approach. This can include milling and removing the
existing bituminous surfaces, which can then be blended with new aggregate or removed existing
aggregate base to create a recycled aggregate base material meeting MnDOT Spec. 3138.
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
7.1 Definitions
The ensuing sections use italicized words, which have the following definitions:
Grading grade is defined as the grade which contacts the bottom of the aggregate base layer.
Sand subbase is a uniform thickness sand layer placed as the top of subgrade (directly below
grading grade) which is intended to improve the frost and drainage characteristics of the
pavement system by better draining excess water in the aggregate base and subbase, by
reducing and “bridging” frost heaving, and by reducing spring thaw weakening effects.
Critical subgrade zone is the subgrade portion beneath and within three vertical feet of the
grading grade. A sand subbase, if placed, would be considered the upper portion of the
critical subgrade zone.
Select Grading Materials are all mineral soils excluding soils containing 80% or more silt-
sized particles; marl; and organic soils.
Granular Material shall meet the requirements of MnDOT Specification 3149.2.B.1.
Select Granular Material shall meet the requirements of MnDOT Specification 3149.2.B.2.
Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
2016 Street Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN
December 4, 2015 ENGINEERING
AET Report No. 26-01024 TESTING, INC.
Page 11 of 19
Test roll is a means of evaluating the near-surface stability of subgrade soils (usually non -
granular). Suitability is determined by the depth of rutting or deflection caused by passage of
heavy rubber-tired construction equipment, such as a loaded dump truck, over the test area.
Yielding of less than 1-inch is normally considered acceptable, although engineering
judgment may be applied depending on equipment used, soil conditions present, and/or
pavement performance expectations.
Unstable soils are those soils which do not pass a test roll. Unstable soils typically have a
water content exceeding the standard optimum water content defined in ASTM:D698
(Standard Proctor test).
Organic soils are those soils which have sufficient organic content such that engineering
properties and stability are affected (generally more than 3% organic content). These soils
are usually black to dark brown in color.
7.2 Subgrade Preparation-Full and Partial Reconstruction
7.2.1 Sand Subbase
Due to the clayey subgrade soils encountered along 4th Street and the TH 25 turn lanes, we
recommend a minimum 12-inch thick sand subbase layer be placed during construction of these
roadways. The material used for sand subbase should consist of Select Granular Material.
Placing a sand subbase layer will reduce periods of saturation and thaw weakening and to better
control frost movements, thereby improving long-term pavement performance.
If there is a need to vary the thickness of the sand subbase along the profile of the road, we
recommend the thickness have a taper of no steeper than 10:1 (H: V). A taper of 4:1 (H:V) can
be used perpendicular the centerline for cross streets. The subcut and sand layer placement
should extend slightly beyond the outer edge of curbs to maintain frost uniformity.
In areas where the sand subbase will overlie clay soils, the sand subbase must be provided with
proper subsurface drainage to minimize build-up of water within the sand. This can be
accomplished by placing properly engineered drainage lines in low elevation areas of the top of
Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
2016 Street Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN
December 4, 2015 ENGINEERING
AET Report No. 26-01024 TESTING, INC.
Page 12 of 19
the clay to which subsurface water is directed (typically along the curb lines). If the sand
subbase is placed over existing sandy soils, the drainage lines are not necessary.
7.2.2 Stability Evaluation and Improvement
Before placement of sand subbase or the aggregate base layer, the final subgrade should have
proper stability within the critical subgrade zone. In clay soils, stability should be evaluated
using the test roll procedure, and instability will likely be a result of wetter clayey soils. In
sandy soils, surface compaction of the exposed subgrade should be performed with several
passes of a large, vibratory compactor.
If unstable soils are found under the test roll and/or surface compaction process, then these soils
should be improved by means of scarification, drying, and recompaction, or by subcutting and
replacement. The final soils which remain in place should be capable of passing a test roll prior
to placing the sand subbase and/or aggregate base. Using this approach, it is our judgment that a
test roll should not be necessary at the top of the sand subbase material.
If organic soils are found to be present, we recommend removing these soils where present
within the critical subgrade zone.
7.2.3 Geotextile
In our opinion, a geotextile fabric does not need to be incorporated into the design for this
project. However, a geotextile fabric could be used as a construction aid, to off-set local zones
of subgrade instability, or in areas where deeper subcutting is not possible due to in-place
utilities. If used, the fabric should be placed within the subgrade, below a sand subbase layer,
and it should consist of material meeting MnDOT Spec. 3733 Type 5.
Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
2016 Street Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN
December 4, 2015 ENGINEERING
AET Report No. 26-01024 TESTING, INC.
Page 13 of 19
7.2.4 Fill Placement and Compaction
Following subcutting and preparation of existing soils, fill can be placed as needed to re-attain
subgrade elevation. At this site, it is preferable to use Granular Material or Select Granular
Material for pavement support fill; however, on-site soils meeting the requirements for Select
Grading Materials could also be used.
Fill for pavement support, including all utility trench backfill, should be placed and compacted
per the requirements of MnDOT Spec. 2105.3.F.1 (Specified Density Method). Using ASTM
terminology, this specification requires soils placed within the critical subgrade zone be
compacted to a minimum of 100% of the standard maximum dry unit weight defined in ASTM:
D698 (Standard Proctor test), at a water content within 65% to 102% of the standard optimum
water content. A reduced minimum compaction level of 95% of the standard maximum dry unit
weight can be used below the critical subgrade zone. The top of the sand subbase can be figured
as the top of the 3-foot subgrade zone needing the 100% compaction level; however, the lower
(dry) end of the water content range requirement does not need to apply to the sand subbase.
7.2.5 Aggregate Base
Aggregate base placed for pavement support should meet the gradation and quality requirements
for Class 5 or Class 6 per MnDOT Spec. 3138. Aggregate base placement and compaction
should be performed according to MnDOT Spec. 2211. All aggregate base material (including
existing, imported, or reclaimed) should be tested for compaction using the Penetration Index
Method per MnDOT Spec. 2211.3.D.2.c.
7.3 Reclamation
If used, non-stabilized Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) should be conducted in accordance with
MnDOT Spec. 2215 Full Depth Reclamation (FDR). Stabilized FDR should be conducted in
accordance with the latest MnDOT Special Provision, which is available by contacting AET or
Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
2016 Street Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN
December 4, 2015 ENGINEERING
AET Report No. 26-01024 TESTING, INC.
Page 14 of 19
the MnDOT Grading and Base Unit. If full depth pavement reclamation is used, additional
pavement cores and larger, more representative samples of aggregate base will be needed for
evaluation of non-stabilized FDR or for appropriate mix designs for stabilized FDR.
Existing bituminous which is milled and removed can be blended with new aggregate or
removed existing aggregate base to create a recycled aggregate base material. All recycled
aggregate base material should meet the gradation and quality requirements for Class 5 or Class
6 per MnDOT Spec. 3138.
7.4 Mill & Overlay
Our general recommendations for the mill and overlay approach are presented on the attached
standard sheet entitled “Bituminous Overlay Milling and Preparation.” Special consideration
should be given to existing pavement thickness and condition prior to performing a mill and
overlay. It is important to identify any areas of thin pavements and/or deteriorated pavement
condition to determine the feasibility of the mill and overlay approach.
For the roadways where this approach is being considered, we recommend a 3-inch mill and
overlay. This approach will allow the placement of two 1.5 inch bituminous lifts, which will
allow a significant improvement in ride quality. We recommend placement of MnDOT mixture
SPWEC330B in both lifts, meeting the requirements of the most recent version of MnDOT Spec.
2360. While a PG 58-34 “C” binder is normally recommended for the upper 4 inches of
construction, the PG 58-28 “B” binder is sufficient in this case, because thermal cracking will
not occur from the surface, but from underlying cracks in the remaining bituminous pavement,
which will eventually transfer through to the new surfacing.
Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
2016 Street Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN
December 4, 2015 ENGINEERING
AET Report No. 26-01024 TESTING, INC.
Page 15 of 19
7.5 Design R-Value
For 4th Street and TH 25, we estimate the limiting A-6 and A-2-6 (clayey) soils have a design
subgrade R-value of about 20. For the remaining roadways, we estimate the limiting A-2-4 (silty
sand) soils have a design subgrade R-value of about 30. These estimates are based on Table 5-
3.3(a) and 5-3.3(b) within the MnDOT Pavement Manual (2007) and on our experience.
Assuming a 12-inch thick sand subbase is placed along 4th Street and TH 25, and it contributes
to R-value improvement (rather than granular equivalent contribution), we recommend the
design R-value for these roadways be increased to 30. If a 24-inch thick sand subbase is placed
for the TH 25 turn lanes, the design R-value could be increased to 50.
7.6 Pavement Thickness Designs
Our recommended pavement designs, based on the ADT traffic levels provided by WSB, are
shown in the following tables; each table corresponds to a different subgrade condition. We
recommend limiting Recycled Asphalt Pavement (RAP) within the upper wear course to a
maximum of 10% in order to reduce cracking.
Table C – Clay Subgrade, Estimated R-value 20
Layer
Thickness Material Thickness Material
ADT<1500, BESALS<400,000 ADT=3000, BESALS<800,000
Bituminous Wear Upper 1.5" SPWEB340C (58-34) 2" SPWEB340C (58-34)
Bituminous Wear Lower 2" SPWEB340C (58-34) 2" SPWEB340C (58-34)
Bituminous Non-Wear - SPNWB330B (58-28) - SPNWB330B (58-28)
Aggregate Base 14" Class 5, MnDOT 3138 16" Class 5, MnDOT 3138
17.5" Total Thickness 20"
Layer
Thickness Material Thickness Material
ADT=4750, BESALS<1,300,000 ADT=7900, BESALS<2,100,000
Bituminous Wear Upper 2" SPWEB340C (58-34) 2" SPWEB340C (58-34)
Bituminous Wear Lower 2" SPWEB340C (58-34) 2" SPWEB340C (58-34)
Bituminous Non-Wear 2" SPNWB330B (58-28) 3" SPNWB330B (58-28)
Aggregate Base 14" Class 5, MnDOT 3138 15" Class 5, MnDOT 3138
20" Total Thickness 22"
Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
2016 Street Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN
December 4, 2015 ENGINEERING
AET Report No. 26-01024 TESTING, INC.
Page 16 of 19
Table D – Clay Subgrade with 12-inch thick Sand Subbase
Layer
Thickness Material Thickness Material
ADT<1500, BESALS<400,000 ADT=3000, BESALS<800,000
Bituminous Wear Upper 1.5" SPWEB340C (58-34) 1.5" SPWEB340C (58-34)
Bituminous Wear Lower 1.5" SPWEB340C (58-34) 2" SPWEB340C (58-34)
Bituminous Non-Wear - SPNWB330B (58-28) - SPNWB330B (58-28)
Aggregate Base 8" Class 5, MnDOT 3138 11" Class 5, MnDOT 3138
Sand Subbase 12" Select Granular,
MnDOT 3149.2.B.2 12" Select Granular,
MnDOT 3149.2.B.2
23" Total Thickness 26.5"
Layer
Thickness Material Thickness Material
ADT=4750, BESALS<1,300,000 ADT=7900, BESALS<2,100,000
Bituminous Wear Upper 1.5" SPWEB340C (58-34) 2" SPWEB340C (58-34)
Bituminous Wear Lower 2" SPWEB340C (58-34) 2" SPWEB340C (58-34)
Bituminous Non-Wear 2" SPNWB330B (58-28) 2" SPNWB330B (58-28)
Aggregate Base 9" Class 5, MnDOT 3138 11" Class 5, MnDOT 3138
Sand Subbase 12" Select Granular,
MnDOT 3149.2.B.2 12" Select Granular,
MnDOT 3149.2.B.2
26.5" Total Thickness 29"
Table E – Granular Subgrade, Estimated R-value 30
Layer
Thickness Material Thickness Material
ADT<1500, BESALS<400,000 ADT=3000, BESALS<800,000
Bituminous Wear Upper 1.5" SPWEB340C (58-34) 1.5" SPWEB340C (58-34)
Bituminous Wear Lower 1.5" SPWEB340C (58-34) 2" SPWEB340C (58-34)
Bituminous Non-Wear - SPNWB330B (58-28) - SPNWB330B (58-28)
Aggregate Base 9" Class 5, MnDOT 3138 13" Class 5, MnDOT 3138
12" Total Thickness 16.5"
Layer
Thickness Material Thickness Material
ADT=4750, BESALS<1,300,000 ADT=7900, BESALS<2,100,000
Bituminous Wear Upper 1.5" SPWEB340C (58-34) 2" SPWEB340C (58-34)
Bituminous Wear Lower 2" SPWEB340C (58-34) 2" SPWEB340C (58-34)
Bituminous Non-Wear 2" SPNWB330B (58-28) 2" SPNWB330B (58-28)
Aggregate Base 11" Class 5, MnDOT 3138 13" Class 5, MnDOT 3138
16.5" Total Thickness 19"
Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
2016 Street Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN
December 4, 2015 ENGINEERING
AET Report No. 26-01024 TESTING, INC.
Page 17 of 19
A traffic level of 3 has been used in all of the above mix designs. If rutting is still a concern in
areas of stopping and turning traffic, F binder oil (64-34) should be used in the wear mixes, as
the F binder oil is crack and rut resistant. Although more expensive, the use of F binder oil in the
upper 3 to 4 inches of the pavement section will result in less thermal cracking of the pavement
and subsequently less maintenance and better long-term pavement performance.
7.7 Utility Support, Bedding, and Backfilling
Where utility installation and repairs take place, we recommend that trenching, installation,
repairs, and backfilling be performed prior to final street subgrade preparation and sand subbase
placement. With proper pipe bedding, the soils represented by the borings should provide
adequate foundation support for utility construction. Special bedding may be needed in cases of
trench bottom instability, such as wet/waterbearing silts or sands, or where the pipe is placed
within soils which may create point loads, such as glacial tills with high gravel content, cobbles,
and/or boulders.
We refer you to the attached standard data sheets entitled “Bedding/Foundation Support of
Buried Pipe” and “Utility Excavation Backfilling” for additional recommendations on utility
bedding and for utility backfilling. If ground water enters trenches during construction, we
recommend dewatering be performed such that bedding placement and pipe installation can be
performed in a non-standing water condition.
8.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS
8.1 Potential Difficulties
8.1.1 Water in Excavation
Water can be expected to collect in the excavation bottoms during times of inclement weather or
snow melt. To allow observation of the excavation bottoms, to reduce the potential for soil
Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
2016 Street Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN
December 4, 2015 ENGINEERING
AET Report No. 26-01024 TESTING, INC.
Page 18 of 19
disturbance, and to facilitate filling operations, we recommend water be removed from within the
excavations during construction. Based on the soils encountered, we anticipate the ground water
volumes could be substantial if the utility trenches penetrate into the waterbearing sands.
8.1.2 Wet or Dry Soils
The materials excavated may be wet or dry of the “optimum” condition, making proper
compaction of those materials as new engineered fill not possible unless they are mechanically
moisture conditioned to near the standard optimum water content.
8.1.3 Disturbance of Soils
The on-site soils can become disturbed under construction traffic, especially if the soils are wet.
If soils become disturbed, they should be subcut to the underlying undisturbed soils. The subcut
soils can then be dried and recompacted back into place, or they should be removed and replaced
with drier imported fill.
The instability of soils beneath the soil layer being reworked and compacted may limit the ability
to compact the upper soils. In this case, greater depths of subcutting and stability improvement
may be needed.
Trench bottom instability could result if the utility trenches approach the ground water level.
This may require dewatering prior to trenching and/or the use of coarser bedding materials.
8.1.4 Cobbles and Boulders
The glacial till and coarse alluvial soils at this site can include cobbles and boulders. This may
make excavating procedures somewhat more difficult than normal if they are encountered.
Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
2016 Street Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN
December 4, 2015 ENGINEERING
AET Report No. 26-01024 TESTING, INC.
Page 19 of 19
8.2 Excavation Backsloping
If excavation faces are not retained, the excavations should maintain maximum allowable slopes
in accordance with OSHA Regulations (Standards 29 CFR), Part 1926, Subpart P,
“Excavations” (can be found on www.osha.gov). Even with the required OSHA sloping, water
seepage or surface runoff can potentially induce sideslope erosion or running which could
require slope maintenance. Maintaining excavation face slopes in accordance with OSHA
requirements should be the responsibility of the contractor, and we recommend the construction
documents be prepared as such.
8.3 Observation and Testing
The recommendations in this report are based on the subsurface conditions found at our test
boring locations. Since the soil conditions can be expected to vary away from the soil boring
locations, we recommend on-site observation by a geotechnical engineer/technician during
construction to evaluate these potential changes. Sieve analysis tests should be conducted on
sand subbase and aggregate base materials to evaluate compliance with the project material
specifications. Soil density and Proctor testing should also be performed on new fill placed in
order to document that project specifications for compaction have been satisfied.
9.0 LIMITATIONS
Within the limitations of scope, budget, and schedule, we have endeavored to provide our
services according to generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices at this time and
location. Other than this, no warranty, either expressed or implied, is intended.
Important information regarding risk management and proper use of this report is given in
Appendix B entitled “Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use”.
Page 1 of 2
01REP020 (07/08) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC.
BITUMINOUS OVERLAY MILLING AND PREPARATION
COLD MILLING OPERATION
Cold milling is generally conducted longitudinally along the pavement profile. The forward speed of the machine, rotational
velocity of the rotating drum, spacing of the carbide bits, and grade control of the cutting head should be closely controlled to
produce a uniform texture throughout the project. The longitudinal profile should be held as close as practical to the same
tolerance as new construction, since the milled profile will have a significant impact upon the ride of the overlaid pavement,
especially when only a single lift of overlay is placed.
Normally, the recommended milling depth corresponds to the lift thickness of the original pavement. It is best to remove the
entire layer as the bottom of the lift is typically where bonding and stripping issues occur. The depth of milling may require
adjustment in the field to ensure that a full layer is removed and that portions of a layer are not left bonded to the underl ying
surface. Additionally, if there is a large amount of stripping present, the milling depth should be sufficiently deep to remove the
stripped areas. This depth is typically determined by coring adjacent to cracks and looking at both the layer thickness and a ny
evidence of stripping. The milling depth can be adjusted to remove areas with significant stripping present, or if the stripping
is limited only to a few transverse cracks, a smaller milling machine can be brought in the remove additional material in the se
areas. Patching can be performed after the milling operation for cases where a minimal amount of stripping is present or in the
areas where cracks are milled deeper than the remaining roadway.
Please note that the milling depth should also take into consider ation the original pavement depth that will remain after the
milling operation. It is likely that the milling machine will break through the underlying pavement if there will be less tha n 1.5
inches of the original pavement remaining, thereby causing probl ems with the milling operation and overlay.
PRE-OVERLAY PREPARATION
It is recommended that a tack coat is applied between all bituminous layers and prior to placing any bituminous mixtures on the
milled surface. The bituminous tack coat material should be applied at a uniform rate of 0.03 to 0.05 gal/yd2 between
bituminous layers and 0.07 to 0.10 gal/yd2 on the milled bituminous surface prior to being overlaid. The application rates are
for undiluted emulsions (as supplied from the refinery) or MC and RC liquid asphalts. The asphalt emulsion may be further
diluted in the field in accordance with Mn/DOT Spec. 2357.
Prior to overlaying, it is recommended that deteriorated cracks and wheel -path areas are air blasted and power swept to remove
loose material. Air blasting should be completed with high pressure (minimum of 100 psi) equipment. Removal of material at
some deteriorated locations may require the use of a small milling machine or handwork, in addition to the high pressure air
blasting. Regardless of the patch depth, it is important to remove the entire existing deteriorated pavement.
Depressions resulting after air blasting, sweeping, or milling operations that are greater than 1.5 inches in depth and width
should be filled with a Bituminous Patching Mixture meeting Mn/DOT Spec. 2231 and compacted with a small vibratory or
pneumatic roller. Depressions equal to or less than 1.5 inches in depth and width can be filled with the bituminous wear course
mixture.
Consideration should be given to allow traffic to drive over deteriorated joints/cracks, after backfilling (if there are a large
number of these distressed locations) with the recommended bituminous mixtures and proper compaction , for a period of seven
days prior to placement of the wear course mixture. The proposed seven-day delay period will permit traffic to apply additional
compaction to the joint/crack backfill. If further compact ion is not deemed necessary, then patching of depressions greater than
1.5 inches in depth and width can be completed ahead of the paver and compacted with a small vibratory or pneumatic roller.
As previously stated, the smaller depressions will be filled in by the wearing course paving operations.
If the pavement surface, after milling, is lower than the adjacent shoulders, the contractor (as directed by the Engineer), should
construct outlet trenches and take other measures necessary to provide adequate surface drainage for the milled areas.
It is recommended that a notch at least 1 inch deep be milled to allow the placement of 1 inch minimum bituminous wearing
course at the ends of transitions.
Page 2 of 2
01REP020 (07/08) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC.
BITUMINOUS OVERLAY MILLING AND PREPARTION
Please note that as this will be a bonded overlay (i.e., bonded to the milled surface), the amount of pre -overlay repair that must
be performed on an existing pavement is critical to the performance of the overlay. Similarly, reflection crack control measu res
must be applied to these overlays, such as the selection of bituminous mixture and PG binder type . Depending upon the
frequency of existing transverse cracks it may be prudent to select a bituminous mixture and PG binder that will crack at the
existing frequency but be more resistant to degradation from environmental effects such as moisture. Other considerations
include subdrainage, traffic, pavement widening, and shoulders. As a general rule, all the distress types in an existing pavement
that are likely to affect the performance of an overlay within a few years should be repaired. The designer should also consi der
the tradeoffs between pre-overlay repair and the thickness and type of overlay selected. For instance, if the existing pavement
is severely deteriorated, an overlay type that is less sensitive to existing pavement conditions may be more cost effective
without extensive pre-overlay repair.
BITUMINOUS PLACEMENT
The bituminous mixture should meet the most current Mn/DOT Spec. 2360 (Plant -Mixed Asphalt Pavement: Combined
2360/2360 Gyratory/Marshall Design Specification) requirements. Compaction of all bituminous mixt ures should be by the
“Maximum Density Method”.
01REP017 (07/14) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC.
BEDDING/FOUNDATION SUPPORT OF BURIED PIPE
GENERAL
This page addresses soil bedding and foundation support of rigid pipe, such as reinforced concrete, and flexible pipe,
such as steel and plastic. This does not address selection of pipe based on loads and allowable deflections, but rather
addresses the geotechnical/soil aspects of uniform pipe support. Bedding/foundation support needs relate to local
conditions directly beneath and to the sides of the pipe zone, which may be influenced by soft in-situ ground
conditions or by soil disturbance due to soil sensitivity or ground water. Bedding relates to granular materials placed
directly beneath the bottom of the pipe (usually 4" to 6" thick), which is intended to provide increased support
uniformity. We refer to foundation soils as thicker layers of sands and/or gravels (beneath the bedding zone)
intended to provide increased foundation strength support, usually needed due to soft, unstable and/or waterbearing
conditions.
GRANULAR BEDDING
With circular pipes, high local loads (approaching point loads) develop if pipes are placed on hard surfaces. Load
distribution is improved by placing granular bedding materials beneath the pipe, which are either shaped to match
the pipe bottom or are placed without compaction to allow “settling in.” The bedding should be placed in such a
manner that the pipe will be at the proper elevation and slope when the pipe is laid on the bedding. Common
bedding material is defined in MnDOT Specification 3149.2F, Granular Bedding. Published documents recommend
rigid pipes having a diameter of 12" to 54" be placed on a bedding thickness of 4", which increases to 6" of bedding
for pipe diameters ranging from 54" to 72". Beyond a 72" diameter, the bedding thickness can be equal to the pipe
outside diameter divided by 12. Typically, the need for bedding under small diameter pipes (less than 12") depends
on the pipe designer’s specific needs, although in obvious point loads situations (bedrock, cobbles, significant coarse
gravel content), bedding is recommended. Note that bedding should also account for larger diameter bells at joints.
FOUNDATION FILL
Positive uniform strength is usually compromised in soft or unstable trench bottom conditions. In this case, deeper
subcuts and foundation fill placement is needed beneath the pipe. In moderate instability conditions, improvement
can likely be accomplished with a thicker bedding layer. However, in more significant instability situations,
particularly where ground water is present, coarser materials may be neede d to provide a stronger foundation.
Thicker gravel layers can also be a favorable media from which to dewater. The following materials would be
appropriate for stability improvement, with the coarser materials being appropriate for higher instability/groun d
water cases.
Fine Filter Aggregate – MnDOT Specification 3149.2J
Coarse Filter Aggregate –MnDOT Specification 3149.2H
When using a coarser material which includes significant void space, we highly recommend enveloping the entire
gravel layer within a geotextile separation fabric. The gravel material includes open void space, and the fabric acts
as a separator which minimizes the intrusion of fines into the open void space. If additional granular bedding sand is
used above foundation gravel, the fabric would also prevent downward infiltration of bedding sand into the rock
void space.
Although it is preferred to not highly compact thin granular bedding zones directly beneath the pipe center, it is
desirable to compact the foundation materials to prevent more significant pipe settlement. We recommend
foundation fill be compacted to a minimum of 95% of the Standard Proctor density (ASTM : D698). It is not possible
to test coarse rock fill, although this material should still be well compacted/ tamped.
Often, pipes entering structures such as catch basins, lift stations, etc., enter the structure at a higher elevation than
the structure bottom, and are therefore placed on the structure backfill. Fill beneath these pipes should be considered
foundation fill. Depending on the flexibility of the connection design, it may be necessary to increase the minimum
compaction level to reduce differential settlements, particularly with thicker fills.
SIDE FILL SUPPORT
If the pipe designer requires support from the side fill, granular bedding should also be placed along the sides of the
pipe. In poor soil conditions, the sand fill may need to be placed laterally up to two pipe diameters on both sides of
the pipe. With rigid pipe, compacted sand placement up to the spring line (within the haunch area) is usually
sufficient. With flexible pipe, side fill should be placed and compacted at least to the top of the pipe. For positive
support, it is very important to properly compact the sands within the haunch area.
01REP018 (07/14) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC.
UTILITY EXCAVATION BACKFILLING
GENERAL
Clayey and silty soils are often difficult to compact, as they may be naturally wet or dry, or may become wet due to
ground water or runoff water during construction. Soils will need to be placed within a certain range of water
(moisture) content to attain desired compaction levels. Moisture conditioning to within this range can be time
consuming and labor intensive, and will require favorable weather.
The degree of compaction and the soil type used for backfill within open cut utility excavations depends on the
eventual function of the overlying land surface. Details are as follows:
ROADWAYS
Where trenches are located below roadways, we recommend using inorganic fill and compacting these soils per
MnDOT Specification 2105.3F1 (Specified Density Method). This specification requires achieving 100% of the
Standard Proctor density in the upper 3-foot subgrade zone, and 95% below this. Note that this specification also
includes moisture content range requirements which are important for proper subgrade stability.
Where available soils are wet or of poor quality, it may be possible to use the “Quality Compaction Method”
(MnDOT Specification 2105.3F2) for soils below the upper 3-foot subgrade zone if you can tolerate some
subsidence. However, a high level of stability is still important within the upper subgrade zone and recommend that
the “Specified Density Method" be used in this upper subgrade area. We caution that if backfill soils in the lower
trench area are significantly unstable, it may be difficult or even impossible to properly compact soils within the
upper 3-foot subgrade zone. In this case, road subgrade stability can be improved by placing a geotextile
reinforcement fabric directly over the unstable soils followed by properly drained granular fill placement.
STRUCTURAL AREAS
If fill is placed beneath or within the significant zone of influence of a structure (typically a 1:1 lateral oversize
zone), the soil type and minimum compaction level will need to be evaluated on an individual basis. Because
trenches result in variable fill depths over a short lateral distance , higher than normal compaction levels and/or more
favorable (sandy) soil fill types may be needed. If this situation exists, it is important that special geotechnical
engineering review be performed.
NON-STRUCTURAL AREAS
In grass/ditch areas, backfill soils should be placed in reasonable lift thicknesses and compacted to a minimum of
90% of the Standard Proctor density (ASTM: D698) and/or per the Mn/DOT “Quality Compaction Method.” If
lower compaction levels are accepted, more noticeable subsidence at the surface can occur. Steep or high slopes
require special consideration, and if this situation exists, it is important that special geotechnical engineering review
be performed.
SPECIAL CASES
Structural retention systems are often used to reduce impacts on adjacent streets/improvements. If localized
excavations/pits or annular spaces are created which need to be backfilled, it may not be possible to place and
compact soils by the conventional means of backfilling. Retracti on of structural systems can also leave soils
loosened. Significant settlement can occur in areas where backfill cannot be compacted. If these situations are
located in non-structural or non-paved areas, it may be reasonable to accept the settlements and associated follow-up
maintenance in order avoid the high cost of trying to compact the soil or placing flowable lean concrete fill.
However, there may be areas where fill settlement needs to be avoided, especially as the settlement will be
differential from the surrounding surface, or differential from a buried structure in the case of higher piping entering
the structure. Where settlement needs to be avoided, the specification should require that the contractor submit a
backfill compaction plan along with the retention plan. Improper sequencing of retention system removal and
backfilling of the pits could result in excessive settlement and/or lateral movement of nearby improvements.
Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
2016 Street Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN
December 4, 2015 ENGINEERING
AET Report No. 26-01024 TESTING, INC.
Appendix A
Geotechnical Field Exploration and Testing
Boring Log Notes
Unified Soil Classification System
Figure 1 – Boring Locations
Subsurface Boring Logs
Gradation Curves
Appendix A
Geotechnical Field Exploration and Testing
AET Report No. 26-01024
Appendix A - Page 1 of 2 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC.
A.1 FIELD EXPLORATION
The subsurface conditions at the site were explored by drilling and sampling 28 standard penetration test borings. The locations of
the borings appear on Figure 1, preceding the Subsurface Boring Logs in this appendix.
A.2 SAMPLING METHODS
A.2.1 Split-Spoon Samples (SS) - Calibrated to N60 Values
Standard penetration (split-spoon) samples were collected in general accordance with ASTM: D1586 with one primary
modification. The ASTM test method consists of driving a 2 -inch O.D. split-barrel sampler into the in-situ soil with a 140-pound
hammer dropped from a height of 30 inches. The sampler is driven a t otal of 18 inches into the soil. After an initial set of 6 inches,
the number of hammer blows to drive the sampler the final 12 inches is known as the standard penetration resistance or N -value.
Our method uses a modified hammer weight, which is determined by measuring the system energy using a Pile Driving Analyzer
(PDA) and an instrumented rod.
In the past, standard penetration N-value tests were performed using a rope and cathead for the lift and drop system. The energy
transferred to the split-spoon sampler was typically limited to about 60% of its potential energy due to the friction inherent in this
system. This converted energy then provides what is known as an N60 blow count.
The most recent drill rigs incorporate an automatic hammer lift and drop system, which has higher energy efficiency and
subsequently results in lower N-values than the traditional N60 values. By using the PDA energy measurement equipment, we are
able to determine actual energy generated by the drop hammer. With the various hammer systems available, we have found highly
variable energies ranging from 55% to over 100%. Therefore, the intent of AET ’s hammer calibrations is to vary the hammer
weight such that hammer energies lie within about 60% to 65% of the theoretical energy of a 140-pound weight falling 30 inches.
The current ASTM procedure acknowledges the wide variation in N-values, stating that N-values of 100% or more have been
observed. Although we have not yet determined the statistical measurement uncertainty of our calib rated method to date, we can
state that the accuracy deviation of the N-values using this method is significantly better than the standard ASTM Method.
A.2.2 Disturbed Samples (DS)/Spin-up Samples (SU)
Sample types described as “DS” or “SU” on the boring logs are disturbed samples, which are taken from the flights of the auger.
Because the auger disturbs the samples, possible soil layering and contact depths should be considered approximate.
A.2.3 Sampling Limitations
Unless actually observed in a sample, contacts between soil layers are estimated based on the spacing of samples and the action of
drilling tools. Cobbles, boulders, and other large objects generally cannot be recovered from test borings, and they may be p resent
in the ground even if they are not noted on the boring logs.
Determining the thickness of “topsoil” layers is usually limited, due to variations in topsoil definition, sample recovery, a nd other
factors. Visual-manual description often relies on color for determination, and transitio ning changes can account for significant
variation in thickness judgment. Accordingly, the topsoil thickness presented on the logs should not be the sole basis for
calculating topsoil stripping depths and volumes. If more accurate information is needed rel ating to thickness and topsoil quality
definition, alternate methods of sample retrieval and testing should be employed.
A.3 CLASSIFICATION METHODS
Soil descriptions shown on the boring logs are based on the Unified Soil Classification (USC) system. The USC system is
described in ASTM: D2487 and D2488. Where laboratory classification tests (sieve analysis or Atterberg Limits) have been
performed, accurate classifications per ASTM: D2487 are possible. Otherwise, soil descriptions shown on the boring logs are
visual-manual judgments. Charts are attached which provide information on the USC system, the descriptive terminology, and the
symbols used on the boring logs.
Visual-manual judgment of the AASHTO Soil Group is also noted as a part of the soil description. A chart presenting details of the
AASHTO Soil Classification System is also attached.
Appendix A
Geotechnical Field Exploration and Testing
AET Report No. 26-01024
Appendix A - Page 2 of 2 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC.
The boring logs include descriptions of apparent geology. The geologic depositional origin of each soil layer is interpreted
primarily by observation of the soil samples, which can be limited. Observations of the surrounding topography, vegetation, and
development can sometimes aid this judgment.
A.4 WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
The ground water level measurements are shown at the bottom of the boring logs. The follow ing information appears under
“Water Level Measurements” on the logs:
Date and Time of measurement
Sampled Depth: lowest depth of soil sampling at the time of measurement
Casing Depth: depth to bottom of casing or hollow-stem auger at time of measurement
Cave-in Depth: depth at which measuring tape stops in the borehole
Water Level: depth in the borehole where free water is encountered
Drilling Fluid Level: same as Water Level, except that the liquid in the borehole is drilling fluid
The true location of the water table at the boring locations may be different than the water levels measured in the boreholes. This is
possible because there are several factors that can affect the water level measurements in the borehole. Some of these factor s
include: permeability of each soil layer in profile, presence of perched water, amount of time between water level readings,
presence of drilling fluid, weather conditions, and use of borehole casing.
A.5 LABORATORY TEST METHODS
A.5.1 Water Content Tests
Conducted per AET Procedure 01-LAB-010, which is performed in general accordance with ASTM: D2216 and AASHTO: T265.
A.5.2 Sieve Analysis of Soils (thru #200 Sieve)
Conducted per AET Procedure 01-LAB-040, which is performed in general conformance with ASTM: D6913, Method A.
A.6 TEST STANDARD LIMITATIONS
Field and laboratory testing is done in general conformance with the described procedures. Compliance with any other standard s
referenced within the specified standard is neither inferred nor implied.
A.7 SAMPLE STORAGE
Unless notified to do otherwise, we routinely retain representative samples of the soils recovered from the borings for a per iod of
30 days.
01REP052C (7/11) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC.
BORING LOG NOTES
DRILLING AND SAMPLING SYMBOLS TEST SYMBOLS
Symbol Definition Symbol Definition
AR: Sample of material obtained from cuttings blown out
the top of the borehole during air rotary procedure.
B, H, N: Size of flush-joint casing
CAS: Pipe casing, number indicates nominal diameter in
inches
COT: Clean-out tube
DC: Drive casing; number indicates diameter in inches
DM: Drilling mud or bentonite slurry
DR: Driller (initials)
DS: Disturbed sample from auger flights
DP: Direct push drilling; a 2.125 inch OD outer casing
with an inner 1½ inch ID plastic tube is driven
continuously into the ground.
FA: Flight auger; number indicates outside diameter in
inches
HA: Hand auger; number indicates outside diameter
HSA: Hollow stem auger; number indicates inside diameter
in inches
LG: Field logger (initials)
MC: Column used to describe moisture condition of
samples and for the ground water level symbols
N (BPF): Standard penetration resistance (N-value) in blows per
foot (see notes)
NQ: NQ wireline core barrel
PQ: PQ wireline core barrel
RDA: Rotary drilling with compressed air and roller or drag
bit.
RDF: Rotary drilling with drilling fluid and roller or drag bit
REC: In split-spoon (see notes), direct push and thin-walled
tube sampling, the recovered length (in inches) of
sample. In rock coring, the length of core recovered
(expressed as percent of the total core run). Zero
indicates no sample recovered.
SS: Standard split-spoon sampler (steel; 1.5" is inside
diameter; 2" outside diameter); unless indicated
otherwise
SU Spin-up sample from hollow stem auger
TW: Thin-walled tube; number indicates inside diameter in
inches
WASH: Sample of material obtained by screening returning
rotary drilling fluid or by which has collected inside
the borehole after “falling” through drilling fluid
WH: Sampler advanced by static weight of drill rod and
hammer
WR: Sampler advanced by static weight of drill rod
94mm: 94 millimeter wireline core barrel
▼: Water level directly measured in boring
: Estimated water level based solely on sample
appearance
CONS: One-dimensional consolidation test
DEN: Dry density, pcf
DST: Direct shear test
E: Pressuremeter Modulus, tsf
HYD: Hydrometer analysis
LL: Liquid Limit, %
LP: Pressuremeter Limit Pressure, tsf
OC: Organic Content, %
PERM: Coefficient of permeability (K) test; F - Field;
L - Laboratory
PL: Plastic Limit, %
qp: Pocket Penetrometer strength, tsf (approximate)
qc: Static cone bearing pressure, tsf
qu: Unconfined compressive strength, psf
R: Electrical Resistivity, ohm-cms
RQD: Rock Quality Designation of Rock Core, in percent
(aggregate length of core pieces 4" or more in length
as a percent of total core run)
SA: Sieve analysis
TRX: Triaxial compression test
VSR: Vane shear strength, remolded (field), psf
VSU: Vane shear strength, undisturbed (field), psf
WC: Water content, as percent of dry weight
%-200: Percent of material finer than #200 sieve
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST NOTES
(Calibrated Hammer Weight)
The standard penetration test consists of driving a split-spoon
sampler with a drop hammer (calibrated weight varies to provide
N60 values) and counting the number of blows applied in each of
three 6" increments of penetration. If the sampler is driven less
than 18" (usually in highly resistant material), permitted in
ASTM: D1586, the blows for each complete 6" increment and for
each partial increment is on the boring log. For partial increments,
the number of blows is shown to the nearest 0.1' below the slash.
The length of sample recovered, as shown on the “REC” column,
may be greater than the distance indicated in the N column. The
disparity is because the N-value is recorded below the initial 6"
set (unless partial penetration defined in ASTM: D1586 is
encountered) whereas the length of sample recovered is for the
entire sampler drive (which may even extend more than 18").
A-7
A-7-5
A-7-6
Sieve Analysis, Percent passing:
No. 10 (2.00 mm) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .50 max.. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .
No. 40 (0.425 mm) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30 max.50 max.51 min.. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .
No. 200 (0.075 mm) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15 max.25 max.10 max.35 max.35 max.35 max.35 max.36 min.36 min.36 min.36 min.
Characteristics of Fraction Passing No. 40 (0.425 mm)
Liquid limit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .40 max.41 min.40 max.41 min.40 max.41 min.40 max.41 min.
Plasticity index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .N.P.10 max.10 max.11 min.11 min.10 max.10 max.11 min.11 min.
General Ratings as Subgrade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Definitions of Gravel, Sand and Silt-Clay
01CLS022 (07/11)AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC.
The term "silty" is applied to fine material having plasticity index of 10 or less
and the term "clayey" is applied to fine material having plasticity index of 11 or
greater.
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS
AASHTO SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
Classification of Soils and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures
GRAVEL - Material passing sieve with 3-in. square openings and retained on
the No. 10 sieve.
COARSE SAND - Material passing the No. 10 sieve and retained on the No. 40
sieve.
FINE SAND - Material passing the No. 40 sieve and retained on the No. 200
sieve.
COMBINED SILT AND CLAY - Material passing the No. 200 sieve
Excellent to Good
Group A-8 soils are organic clays or peat with organic content >5%.
BOULDERS (retained on 3-in. sieve) should be excluded from the portion of
the sample to which the classificaiton is applied, but the percentage of such
material, if any, in the sample should be recorded.
(35% or less passing No. 200 sieve)(More than 35% passing No. 200 sieve)General Classification
A-4 A-5
The terms "gravel", "coarse sand", "fine sand" and "silt-clay", as
determinable from the minimum test data required in this
classification arrangement and as used in subsequent word
descriptions are defined as follows:
Granular Materials Silt-Clay Materials
A-1 A-2
A-2-6 A-2-7
. . . .
6 max.
Fine
Sand Silty or Clayey Gravel and Sand Silty Soils Clayey Soils
Plasticity index of A-7-5 subgroup is equal to or less than LL minus 30. Plasticity index of A-7-6 subgroup is greater than LL minus 30.
A-3 A-2-4 A-2-5
Stone Fragments,
Gravel and Sand
Fair to Poor
A-6
The placing of A-3 before A-2 is necessary in the "left to right elimination process" and does not indicate superiority of A-3 over A-2.
Usual Types of Significant Constituent Materials
A-1-a A-1-bGroup Classification
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
35
0
2
4
6
8 101214161820
30
40
50
60
70
80
10
20304050607080100
140
180
LIQUID
L
I
M
I
T
PLAST
I
C
I
T
Y
I
N
D
E
X
PE
R
C
E
N
T
P
A
S
S
I
N
G
N
O
.
2
0
0
S
I
E
V
E
PA
R
T
I
A
L
G
R
O
U
P
I
N
D
E
X
GROUP INDEX CHART
Group Index (GI) = (F-35) [0.2+0.005 (LL-40) ] + 0.01 (F-15)
(PI-10) where F = % Passing No. 200 sieve, LL = Liquid
Limit, and PI = Plasticity Index.
When working with A-2-6 and A-2-7 subgroups
the Partial Group Index (PGI) is determined from the
PI only.
When the combined Partial Group Indices are
negative, the Group Index should be reported as zero.
A-
2
-
6
a
n
d
A
-
2
-
7
82% Passing No. 200 sieve
LL = 38
PI = 21
PGI = 8.9 for LL
PGI = 7.4 for PI
GI = 16
Then:Example:
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Sub-
G
r
o
u
p
A-7-5
S
u
b
-
G
r
o
u
p
A
-
7
-
6
A-7A-5
A-4 A-6
PI
=
L
L
-
3
0
PLASTICITY INDEX (PI)
Liquid Limit and Plasticity Index Ranges for the
A-4, A-5, A-6 and A-7 Subgroups
Li
q
u
i
d
L
i
m
i
t
01CLS021 (07/08) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC.
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
ASTM Designations: D 2487, D2488
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory TestsA
Soil Classification Notes
ABased on the material passing the 3-in
(75-mm) sieve.
BIf field sample contained cobbles or
boulders, or both, add “with cobbles or
boulders, or both” to group name.
CGravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual
symbols:
GW-GM well-graded gravel with silt
GW-GC well-graded gravel with clay
GP-GM poorly graded gravel with silt
GP-GC poorly graded gravel with clay
DSands with 5 to 12% fines require dual
symbols:
SW-SM well-graded sand with silt
SW-SC well-graded sand with clay
SP-SM poorly graded sand with silt
SP-SC poorly graded sand with clay
(D30)2
ECu = D60 /D10, Cc =
D10 x D60
FIf soil contains >15% sand, add “with
sand” to group name.
GIf fines classify as CL-ML, use dual
symbol GC-GM, or SC-SM.
HIf fines are organic, add “with organic
fines” to group name.
IIf soil contains >15% gravel, add “with
gravel” to group name.
JIf Atterberg limits plot is hatched area,
soil is a CL-ML silty clay.
KIf soil contains 15 to 29% plus No. 200
add “with sand” or “with gravel”,
whichever is predominant.
LIf soil contains >30% plus No. 200,
predominantly sand, add “sandy” to
group name.
MIf soil contains >30% plus No. 200,
predominantly gravel, add “gravelly”
to group name.
NPl>4 and plots on or above “A” line.
OPl<4 or plots below “A” line.
PPl plots on or above “A” line.
QPl plots below “A” line.
RFiber Content description shown below.
Group
Symbol
Group NameB
Coarse-Grained
Soils More
than 50%
retained on
No. 200 sieve
Gravels More
than 50% coarse
fraction retained
on No. 4 sieve
Clean Gravels
Less than 5%
finesC
Cu>4 and 1<Cc<3E GW Well graded gravelF
Cu<4 and/or 1>Cc>3E GP Poorly graded gravelF
Gravels with
Fines more
than 12% fines C
Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravelF.G.H
Fines classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravelF.G.H
Sands 50% or
more of coarse
fraction passes
No. 4 sieve
Clean Sands
Less than 5%
finesD
Cu>6 and 1<Cc<3E SW Well-graded sandI
Cu<6 and/or 1>Cc>3E SP Poorly-graded sandI
Sands with
Fines more
than 12% fines D
Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sandG.H.I
Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sandG.H.I
Fine-Grained
Soils 50% or
more passes
the No. 200
sieve
(see Plasticity
Chart below)
Silts and Clays
Liquid limit less
than 50
inorganic PI>7 and plots on or above
“A” lineJ
CL Lean clayK.L.M
PI<4 or plots below
“A” lineJ
ML SiltK.L.M
organic Liquid limit–oven dried <0.75
Liquid limit – not dried
OL Organic clayK.L.M.N
Organic siltK.L.M.O
Silts and Clays
Liquid limit 50
or more
inorganic PI plots on or above “A” line CH Fat clayK.L.M
PI plots below “A” line MH Elastic siltK.L.M
organic Liquid limit–oven dried <0.75
Liquid limit – not dried
OH Organic clayK.L.M.P
Organic siltK.L.M.Q
Highly organic
soil
Primarily organic matter, dark
in color, and organic in odor
PT PeatR
3 2 ½1 ¾4 10 20 40 60 140 200
100
80
60
40
20
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
81
Sieve NumberScreen Opening (in.)
50 10 5 1.0 0.10.5
PARTICLE SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
SIEVE ANALYSIS
PE
R
C
E
N
T
P
A
S
S
I
N
G
PE
R
C
E
N
T
R
E
T
A
I
N
E
D
D60 = 15mm
D30 = 2.5mm
D10 = 0.075mm
Cu = = = 200D60
D10
15
0.075 Cc = = = 5.6(D30)
D10 x D60
2.5
0.075 x 15
2 2
CL-ML
For classification of fine-grained soils and
fine-grained fraction of coarse-grained soils.
Equation of "A"-line
Horizontal at PI = 4 to LL = 25.5.
then PI = 0.73 (LL-20)
Equation of "U"-line
Vertical at LL = 16 to PI = 7.
then PI = 0.9 (LL-8)
"A" L
I
N
E
"U"
L
I
N
E
CL OR OL
CH OR OH
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 0 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
16
7
4
PL
A
S
T
I
C
I
T
Y
I
N
D
E
X
(
P
I
)
LIQUID LIMIT (LL) Plasticity Chart
ADDITIONAL TERMINOLOGY NOTES USED BY AET FOR SOIL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
Grain Size
Term Particle Size
Boulders Over 12"
Cobbles 3" to 12"
Gravel #4 sieve to 3"
Sand #200 to #4 sieve
Fines (silt & clay) Pass #200 sieve
Gravel Percentages
Term Percent
A Little Gravel 3% - 14%
With Gravel 15% - 29%
Gravelly 30% - 50%
Consistency of Plastic Soils
Term N-Value, BPF
Very Soft less than 2
Soft 2 - 4
Firm 5 - 8
Stiff 9 - 15
Very Stiff 16 - 30
Hard Greater than 30
Relative Density of Non-Plastic Soils
Term N-Value, BPF
Very Loose 0 - 4
Loose 5 - 10
Medium Dense 11 - 30
Dense 31 - 50
Very Dense Greater than 50
Moisture/Frost Condition
(MC Column)
D (Dry): Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to
touch.
M (Moist): Damp, although free water not
visible. Soil may still have a high
water content (over “optimum”).
W (Wet/ Free water visible, intended to
Waterbearing): describe non-plastic soils.
Waterbearing usually relates to
sands and sand with silt.
F (Frozen): Soil frozen
Layering Notes
Laminations: Layers less than
½" thick of
differing material
or color.
Lenses: Pockets or layers
greater than ½"
thick of differing
material or color.
Peat Description
Fiber Content
Term (Visual Estimate)
Fibric Peat: Greater than 67%
Hemic Peat: 33 – 67%
Sapric Peat: Less than 33%
Organic Description (if no lab tests)
Soils are described as organic, if soil is not peat
and is judged to have sufficient organic fines
content to influence the Liquid Limit properties.
Slightly organic used for borderline cases.
Root Inclusions
With roots: Judged to have sufficient quantity
of roots to influence the soil
properties.
Trace roots: Small roots present, but not judged
to be in sufficient quantity to
significantly affect soil properties.
ML OR OL
MH OR OH
Project: 2016 Street Improvements
Monticello, Minnesota
AET Report No.:
26-01024
Subject:
Approximate Boring Locations
Date:
11/05/2015
Scale:
NA
Drawn By:
WSB
Checked By:
MJLH Figure 1
15
20
16
FILL
COARSE
ALLUVIUM
6" Bituminous pavement
12" FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, pieces
of bituminous, dark brown (A-1-b) (possible
base)
FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, brown
(A-1-b)
SAND WITH GRAVEL, fine to medium
grained, light brown, moist, dense to medium
dense (SP) (A-1-b)
END OF BORING
M
M
M
SU
SS
SS
SS
31
31
24
SAMPLEDDEPTH0-4'
1C
4.0
DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL
DR:
4.06.0
DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
None
SB
TIME
9/17/15
WATERLEVEL
LG:
BORINGCOMPLETED:
DS
DATE3.25" HSA
DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
THE ATTACHED
SHEETS FOR AN
EXPLANATION OF
TERMINOLOGY ON
THIS LOG
CASINGDEPTH
9/17/15
CAVE-INDEPTH
Rig:
10:25
Surface Elevation 956.9
Log of Boring No.
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
MC
SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
SAMPLETYPEGEOLOGYDEPTHINFEET WCN PLDEN %-#200LLMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RECIN.
03/2011 01-DHR-060
1
2
3
4
5
6
FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
26-01024
2016 Monticello Street Improvements; Monticello, MN
AET No:
Project:
B-1 (p. 1 of 1)
AE
T
_
C
O
R
P
2
6
-
0
1
0
2
4
.
G
P
J
A
E
T
+
C
P
T
+
W
E
L
L
.
G
D
T
1
1
/
5
/
1
5
18
24
20
FILL
COARSE
ALLUVIUM
4.75" Bituminous pavement
FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel, dark
brown (A-2-4)
SAND, a little gravel, medium to fine grained,
light brown, moist, medium dense (SP) (A-1-b)
END OF BORING
M
M
M
SU
SS
SS
SS
25
28
12
SAMPLEDDEPTH0-4'
1C
4.0
DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL
DR:
4.06.0
DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
None
SB
TIME
9/17/15
WATERLEVEL
LG:
BORINGCOMPLETED:
DS
DATE3.25" HSA
DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
THE ATTACHED
SHEETS FOR AN
EXPLANATION OF
TERMINOLOGY ON
THIS LOG
CASINGDEPTH
9/17/15
CAVE-INDEPTH
Rig:
2:00
Surface Elevation 945.5
Log of Boring No.
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
MC
SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
SAMPLETYPEGEOLOGYDEPTHINFEET WCN PLDEN %-#200LLMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RECIN.
03/2011 01-DHR-060
1
2
3
4
5
6
FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
26-01024
2016 Monticello Street Improvements; Monticello, MN
AET No:
Project:
B-3 (p. 1 of 1)
AE
T
_
C
O
R
P
2
6
-
0
1
0
2
4
.
G
P
J
A
E
T
+
C
P
T
+
W
E
L
L
.
G
D
T
1
1
/
5
/
1
5
17
24
24
FILL4.5" Bituminous pavement
FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel, dark
brown to brown (A-2-4)
FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel and clayey
sand, brown and dark brown (A-2-4)
END OF BORING
7M
M
M
SU
SS
SS
SS
26
26
27
16
SAMPLEDDEPTH0-4'
1C
4.0
DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL
DR:
4.06.0
DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
None
SB
TIME
9/17/15
WATERLEVEL
LG:
BORINGCOMPLETED:
DS
DATE3.25" HSA
DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
THE ATTACHED
SHEETS FOR AN
EXPLANATION OF
TERMINOLOGY ON
THIS LOG
CASINGDEPTH
9/17/15
CAVE-INDEPTH
Rig:
11:35
Surface Elevation 941.0
Log of Boring No.
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
MC
SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
SAMPLETYPEGEOLOGYDEPTHINFEET WCN PLDEN %-#200LLMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RECIN.
03/2011 01-DHR-060
1
2
3
4
5
6
FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
26-01024
2016 Monticello Street Improvements; Monticello, MN
AET No:
Project:
B-5 (p. 1 of 1)
AE
T
_
C
O
R
P
2
6
-
0
1
0
2
4
.
G
P
J
A
E
T
+
C
P
T
+
W
E
L
L
.
G
D
T
1
1
/
5
/
1
5
13
20
20
FILL
COARSE
ALLUVIUM
OR FILL
5" Bituminous pavement
FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel, dark
brown (A-2-4)
SAND WITH SILT AND GRAVEL, fine to
medium grained, brown, moist, medium dense
(SP-SM) (A-1-b) (possible fill)
END OF BORING
Offset 6 feet north due to utilities.
M
M
M
SU
SS
SS
SS
23
14
14
SAMPLEDDEPTH0-4'
1C
4.0
DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL
DR:
4.06.0
DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
None
SB
TIME
9/17/15
WATERLEVEL
LG:
BORINGCOMPLETED:
DS
DATE3.25" HSA
DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
THE ATTACHED
SHEETS FOR AN
EXPLANATION OF
TERMINOLOGY ON
THIS LOG
CASINGDEPTH
9/17/15
CAVE-INDEPTH
Rig:
12:25
Surface Elevation 935.7
Log of Boring No.
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
MC
SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
SAMPLETYPEGEOLOGYDEPTHINFEET WCN PLDEN %-#200LLMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RECIN.
03/2011 01-DHR-060
1
2
3
4
5
6
FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
26-01024
2016 Monticello Street Improvements; Monticello, MN
AET No:
Project:
B-6 (p. 1 of 1)
AE
T
_
C
O
R
P
2
6
-
0
1
0
2
4
.
G
P
J
A
E
T
+
C
P
T
+
W
E
L
L
.
G
D
T
1
1
/
5
/
1
5
14
14
18
FILL
COARSE
ALLUVIUM
6.25" Bituminous pavement
FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel and clayey
sand, dark brown (A-2-4)
GRAVELLY SAND, medium to fine grained,
light brown, moist, medium dense (SP) (A-1-b)
END OF BORING
M
M
M
SU
SS
SS
SS
16
18
23
SAMPLEDDEPTH0-4'
1C
4.0
DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL
DR:
4.06.0
DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
None
SB
TIME
9/17/15
WATERLEVEL
LG:
BORINGCOMPLETED:
DS
DATE3.25" HSA
DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
THE ATTACHED
SHEETS FOR AN
EXPLANATION OF
TERMINOLOGY ON
THIS LOG
CASINGDEPTH
9/17/15
CAVE-INDEPTH
Rig:
12:45
Surface Elevation 932.3
Log of Boring No.
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
MC
SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
SAMPLETYPEGEOLOGYDEPTHINFEET WCN PLDEN %-#200LLMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RECIN.
03/2011 01-DHR-060
1
2
3
4
5
6
FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
26-01024
2016 Monticello Street Improvements; Monticello, MN
AET No:
Project:
B-7 (p. 1 of 1)
AE
T
_
C
O
R
P
2
6
-
0
1
0
2
4
.
G
P
J
A
E
T
+
C
P
T
+
W
E
L
L
.
G
D
T
1
1
/
5
/
1
5
18
19
24
FILL
COARSE
ALLUVIUM
4.5" Bituminous pavement
FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel, brown
(A-2-4)
FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, brown
(A-1-b)
SAND WITH SILT, a little gravel, medium to
fine grained, brown, moist, medium dense
(SP-SM) (A-1-b)
END OF BORING
M
M
M
SU
SS
SS
SS
20
17
14
SAMPLEDDEPTH0-4'
1C
4.0
DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL
DR:
4.06.0
DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
None
SB
TIME
9/17/15
WATERLEVEL
LG:
BORINGCOMPLETED:
DS
DATE3.25" HSA
DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
THE ATTACHED
SHEETS FOR AN
EXPLANATION OF
TERMINOLOGY ON
THIS LOG
CASINGDEPTH
9/17/15
CAVE-INDEPTH
Rig:
1:00
Surface Elevation 933.6
Log of Boring No.
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
MC
SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
SAMPLETYPEGEOLOGYDEPTHINFEET WCN PLDEN %-#200LLMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RECIN.
03/2011 01-DHR-060
1
2
3
4
5
6
FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
26-01024
2016 Monticello Street Improvements; Monticello, MN
AET No:
Project:
B-8 (p. 1 of 1)
AE
T
_
C
O
R
P
2
6
-
0
1
0
2
4
.
G
P
J
A
E
T
+
C
P
T
+
W
E
L
L
.
G
D
T
1
1
/
5
/
1
5
18
16
13
11
17
14
16
FILL
COARSE
ALLUVIUM
OR FILL
COARSE
ALLUVIUM
6" Bituminous pavement
11.5" FILL, mixture of silty sand and clayey
sand, a little gravel, dark brown and dark grayish
brown (A-2-4, A-2-6)
FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel, dark
brown (A-1-b)
FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, a little
clayey sand, brown (A-1-b)
FILL, mostly sand with silt and gravel, light
brown (A-1-b)
FILL, mostly gravelly sand with silt, pieces of
brick, grayish brown and brown (A-1-b)
SILTY SAND, a little gravel, medium to fine
grained, dark brown, a little black and light
brown, moist, dense (SM) (A-1-b) (possible fill)
SAND, a little gravel, medium to fine grained,
light brown, moist, medium dense (SP) (A-1-b)
END OF BORING
Offset to other side of street due to utilities.
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
SU
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
22
17
9
19
34
13
22
SAMPLEDDEPTH0-14½'
1C
14.5
DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL
DR:
15.716.0
DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
None
SB
TIME
9/18/15
WATERLEVEL
LG:
BORINGCOMPLETED:
DS
DATE3.25" HSA
DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
THE ATTACHED
SHEETS FOR AN
EXPLANATION OF
TERMINOLOGY ON
THIS LOG
CASINGDEPTH
9/18/15
CAVE-INDEPTH
Rig:
11:35
Surface Elevation 931.8
Log of Boring No.
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
MC
SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
SAMPLETYPEGEOLOGYDEPTHINFEET WCN PLDEN %-#200LLMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RECIN.
03/2011 01-DHR-060
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
26-01024
2016 Monticello Street Improvements; Monticello, MN
AET No:
Project:
B-9 (p. 1 of 1)
AE
T
_
C
O
R
P
2
6
-
0
1
0
2
4
.
G
P
J
A
E
T
+
C
P
T
+
W
E
L
L
.
G
D
T
1
1
/
5
/
1
5
4
11
1
FILL4.25" Bituminous pavement
FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel, pieces of
concrete, dark brown (A-2-4)
END OF BORING
M
M
M
SU
SS
SS
SS
16
24
13
SAMPLEDDEPTH0-4'
1C
4.0
DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL
DR:
4.06.0
DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
None
SB
TIME
9/17/15
WATERLEVEL
LG:
BORINGCOMPLETED:
DS
DATE3.25" HSA
DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
THE ATTACHED
SHEETS FOR AN
EXPLANATION OF
TERMINOLOGY ON
THIS LOG
CASINGDEPTH
9/17/15
CAVE-INDEPTH
Rig:
1:20
Surface Elevation 929.0
Log of Boring No.
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
MC
SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
SAMPLETYPEGEOLOGYDEPTHINFEET WCN PLDEN %-#200LLMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RECIN.
03/2011 01-DHR-060
1
2
3
4
5
6
FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
26-01024
2016 Monticello Street Improvements; Monticello, MN
AET No:
Project:
B-10 (p. 1 of 1)
AE
T
_
C
O
R
P
2
6
-
0
1
0
2
4
.
G
P
J
A
E
T
+
C
P
T
+
W
E
L
L
.
G
D
T
1
1
/
5
/
1
5
18
16
20
14
12
FILL
COARSE
ALLUVIUM
OR FILL
COARSE
ALLUVIUM
5.5" Bituminous pavement
FILL, mixture of clayey sand and sand with silt,
a little gravel, black and grayish brown (A-2-6,
A-1-b)
FILL, mostly sand with silt and gravel, a little
clayey sand, grayish brown (A-1-b)
FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, dark brown
(A-1-b)
SAND WITH SILT AND GRAVEL, medium to
fine grained, light brown, moist, medium dense
(SP-SM) (A-1-b) (possible fill)
SAND, a little gravel, medium to fine grained,
light brown, moist, medium dense (SP) (A-1-b)
GRAVELLY SILTY SAND, medium to fine
grained, dark grayish brown, moist, medium
dense (SM) (A-1-b)
END OF BORING
Boring offset 8 feet south due to utilities.
13M
M
M
M
M
SU
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
18
12
12
13
16
SAMPLEDDEPTH0-9½'
1C
9.5
DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL
DR:
10.811.0
DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
None
SB
TIME
9/18/15
WATERLEVEL
LG:
BORINGCOMPLETED:
DS
DATE3.25" HSA
DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
THE ATTACHED
SHEETS FOR AN
EXPLANATION OF
TERMINOLOGY ON
THIS LOG
CASINGDEPTH
9/18/15
CAVE-INDEPTH
Rig:
10:40
Surface Elevation 930.1
Log of Boring No.
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
MC
SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
SAMPLETYPEGEOLOGYDEPTHINFEET WCN PLDEN %-#200LLMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RECIN.
03/2011 01-DHR-060
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
26-01024
2016 Monticello Street Improvements; Monticello, MN
AET No:
Project:
B-11 (p. 1 of 1)
AE
T
_
C
O
R
P
2
6
-
0
1
0
2
4
.
G
P
J
A
E
T
+
C
P
T
+
W
E
L
L
.
G
D
T
1
1
/
5
/
1
5
20
20
18
8
14
17
15
FILL
COARSE
ALLUVIUM
OR FILL
TILL
FINE
ALLUVIUM
5" Bituminous pavement
FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel and clayey
sand, dark brown and black (A-1-b)
FILL, mostly sand with silt and gravel, grayish
brown (A-1-b)
SAND WITH SILT, a little gravel, fine to
medium grained, light brown, moist, medium
dense to loose (SP-SM) (A-1-b) (possible fill)
LEAN CLAY WITH SAND, a little gravel,
brownish gray, stiff, laminations of sand and
sandy silt (CL) (A-6)
LEAN CLAY WITH SAND, a little gravel, dark
gray, very stiff (CL) (A-6)
SANDY SILT, dark brownish gray, wet, dense
(ML) (A-4)
SANDY SILT, fine grained, brownish gray,
waterbearing, medium dense, lenses and
laminations of silty sand (ML) (A-4)
END OF BORING
Boring offset 6 feet north due to utilities.
16
15
27
26
M
M
M
M
M
W
W
SU
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
8
14
8
11
20
38
27
SAMPLEDDEPTH0-14½'
1C
14.5
14.5
DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL
DR:
14.3
13.8
16.0
16.0
DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
13.2
12.3
SB
TIME
9/18/15
9/18/15
WATERLEVEL
LG:
BORINGCOMPLETED:
DS
DATE3.25" HSA
DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
THE ATTACHED
SHEETS FOR AN
EXPLANATION OF
TERMINOLOGY ON
THIS LOG
CASINGDEPTH
9/18/15
CAVE-INDEPTH
Rig:
10:00
10:10
Surface Elevation 928.9
Log of Boring No.
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
MC
SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
SAMPLETYPEGEOLOGYDEPTHINFEET WCN PLDEN %-#200LLMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RECIN.
03/2011 01-DHR-060
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
26-01024
2016 Monticello Street Improvements; Monticello, MN
AET No:
Project:
B-12 (p. 1 of 1)
AE
T
_
C
O
R
P
2
6
-
0
1
0
2
4
.
G
P
J
A
E
T
+
C
P
T
+
W
E
L
L
.
G
D
T
1
1
/
5
/
1
5
16
20
20
FILL
COARSE
ALLUVIUM
5.5" Bituminous pavement
11.5" FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, pieces
of bituminous, dark brown (A-1-b) (possible
base)
FILL, mostly sand with silt, a little gravel, brown
(A-1-b)
SAND WITH GRAVEL, fine to medium
grained, light brown, moist, medium dense (SP)
(A-1-b)
END OF BORING
M
M
M
SU
SS
SS
SS
33
28
14
SAMPLEDDEPTH0-4'
1C
4.0
DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL
DR:
4.06.0
DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
None
SB
TIME
9/17/15
WATERLEVEL
LG:
BORINGCOMPLETED:
DS
DATE3.25" HSA
DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
THE ATTACHED
SHEETS FOR AN
EXPLANATION OF
TERMINOLOGY ON
THIS LOG
CASINGDEPTH
9/17/15
CAVE-INDEPTH
Rig:
10:50
Surface Elevation 954.6
Log of Boring No.
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
MC
SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
SAMPLETYPEGEOLOGYDEPTHINFEET WCN PLDEN %-#200LLMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RECIN.
03/2011 01-DHR-060
1
2
3
4
5
6
FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
26-01024
2016 Monticello Street Improvements; Monticello, MN
AET No:
Project:
B-13 (p. 1 of 1)
AE
T
_
C
O
R
P
2
6
-
0
1
0
2
4
.
G
P
J
A
E
T
+
C
P
T
+
W
E
L
L
.
G
D
T
1
1
/
5
/
1
5
18
3
5
2
5
16
18
FILL
COARSE
ALLUVIUM
OR FILL
COARSE
ALLUVIUM
OR TILL
TILL
3.25" Bituminous pavement
10" FILL, mixture of silty sand and clayey sand,
a little gravel, pieces of bituminous, dark brown,
a little black (A-1-b/A-2-6) (possible base)
FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel, brown
(A-1-b)
FILL, mostly sand with silt and gravel, a little
clayey sand, trace roots, light brownish gray
(A-1-b)
SAND WITH SILT, a little gravel, medium to
fine grained, light brownish gray, a little brown,
moist, loose (SP-SM) (A-1-b) (possible fill)
SILTY SAND, a little gravel, dark brown, moist,
medium dense, lenses of clayey sand and lean
clay (SM/SC) (A-2-6)
LEAN CLAY WITH SAND, a little gravel, dark
gray, stiff (CL) (A-6)
END OF BORING
10
16
13
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
SU
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
22
16
7
5
23
12
13
SAMPLEDDEPTH0-14½'
1C
14.5
DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL
DR:
16.016.0
DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
None
SB
TIME
9/18/15
WATERLEVEL
LG:
BORINGCOMPLETED:
DS
DATE3.25" HSA
DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
THE ATTACHED
SHEETS FOR AN
EXPLANATION OF
TERMINOLOGY ON
THIS LOG
CASINGDEPTH
9/18/15
CAVE-INDEPTH
Rig:
1:15
Surface Elevation 926.2
Log of Boring No.
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
MC
SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
SAMPLETYPEGEOLOGYDEPTHINFEET WCN PLDEN %-#200LLMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RECIN.
03/2011 01-DHR-060
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
26-01024
2016 Monticello Street Improvements; Monticello, MN
AET No:
Project:
B-14 (p. 1 of 1)
AE
T
_
C
O
R
P
2
6
-
0
1
0
2
4
.
G
P
J
A
E
T
+
C
P
T
+
W
E
L
L
.
G
D
T
1
1
/
5
/
1
5
18
24
20
FILL4.5" Bituminous pavement
FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel, dark
brown (A-2-4)
FILL, mostly silty sand with gravel, trace roots,
dark brown (A-1-b)
END OF BORING
M
M
M
SU
SS
SS
SS
27
11
10
SAMPLEDDEPTH0-4'
1C
4.0
DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL
DR:
4.06.0
DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
None
SB
TIME
9/17/15
WATERLEVEL
LG:
BORINGCOMPLETED:
DS
DATE3.25" HSA
DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
THE ATTACHED
SHEETS FOR AN
EXPLANATION OF
TERMINOLOGY ON
THIS LOG
CASINGDEPTH
9/17/15
CAVE-INDEPTH
Rig:
1:40
Surface Elevation 926.2
Log of Boring No.
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
MC
SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
SAMPLETYPEGEOLOGYDEPTHINFEET WCN PLDEN %-#200LLMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RECIN.
03/2011 01-DHR-060
1
2
3
4
5
6
FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
26-01024
2016 Monticello Street Improvements; Monticello, MN
AET No:
Project:
B-15 (p. 1 of 1)
AE
T
_
C
O
R
P
2
6
-
0
1
0
2
4
.
G
P
J
A
E
T
+
C
P
T
+
W
E
L
L
.
G
D
T
1
1
/
5
/
1
5
20
7
22
7
8
17
14
FILL
COARSE
ALLUVIUM
TILL
5.5" Bituminous pavement
12.5" FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel,
trace roots, dark brown and black (A-2-4)
(possible base)
FILL, mostly sand with silt, a little gravel,
grayish brown and brown (A-1-b)
FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel and sand
with silt, light grayish brown (A-6)
SAND WITH SILT, a little gravel, light
brownish gray, moist, loose, laminations of silt
(SP-SM) (A-1-b)
SAND WITH SILT AND GRAVEL, medium to
fine grained, grayish brown, moist to
waterbearing, loose (SP-SM) (A-1-b)
SANDY LEAN CLAY, a little gravel, dark gray,
stiff (CL) (A-6)
END OF BORING
22
20
16
18
M
M
M
M
M/W
M
M
SU
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
25
12
8
8
9
13
11
SAMPLEDDEPTH0-14½'
1C
11.5
11.5
DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL
DR:
11.5
11.4
13.5
13.5
DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
10.5
10.4
SB
TIME
9/21/15
9/21/15
WATERLEVEL
LG:
BORINGCOMPLETED:
DS
DATE3.25" HSA
DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
THE ATTACHED
SHEETS FOR AN
EXPLANATION OF
TERMINOLOGY ON
THIS LOG
CASINGDEPTH
9/21/15
CAVE-INDEPTH
Rig:
9:30
9:40
Surface Elevation 927.4
Log of Boring No.
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
MC
SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
SAMPLETYPEGEOLOGYDEPTHINFEET WCN PLDEN %-#200LLMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RECIN.
03/2011 01-DHR-060
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
26-01024
2016 Monticello Street Improvements; Monticello, MN
AET No:
Project:
B-16 (p. 1 of 1)
AE
T
_
C
O
R
P
2
6
-
0
1
0
2
4
.
G
P
J
A
E
T
+
C
P
T
+
W
E
L
L
.
G
D
T
1
1
/
5
/
1
5
19
17
16
16
16
6
14
17
FILL
COARSE
ALLUVIUM
OR FILL
COARSE
ALLUVIUM
TILL
5" Bituminous pavement
FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel, pieces of
bituminous, dark brown and a little black (A-2-4)
SAND WITH SILT, a little gravel, fine to
medium grained, brown, moist, medium dense
(SP-SM) (A-1-b) (possible fill)
SAND WITH SILT, a little gravel, medium to
fine grained, light brown, moist, loose to
medium dense (SP-SM) (A-1-b)
GRAVELLY SAND WITH SILT, fine to
medium grained, grayish brown, waterbearing,
medium dense (SP-SM) (A-1-b)
GRAVELLY SAND, medium to coarse grained,
brown, waterbearing, medium dense (SP)
(A-1-b)
LEAN CLAY WITH SAND, a little gravel, dark
gray, very stiff (CL) (A-6)
END OF BORING
17
M
M
M
M
M
W
W
M
SU
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
13
15
7
16
22
26
20
17
SAMPLEDDEPTH0-19½'
1C
12.0
12.0
19.5
DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL
DR:
12.4
12.4
20.5
13.5
13.5
21.0
DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
11.7
11.7
18.7
SB
TIME
9/18/15
9/18/15
9/18/15
WATERLEVEL
LG:
BORINGCOMPLETED:
DS
DATE3.25" HSA
DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
THE ATTACHED
SHEETS FOR AN
EXPLANATION OF
TERMINOLOGY ON
THIS LOG
CASINGDEPTH
9/18/15
CAVE-INDEPTH
Rig:
1:55
2:05
2:15
Surface Elevation 927.8
Log of Boring No.
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
MC
SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
SAMPLETYPEGEOLOGYDEPTHINFEET WCN PLDEN %-#200LLMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RECIN.
03/2011 01-DHR-060
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
26-01024
2016 Monticello Street Improvements; Monticello, MN
AET No:
Project:
B-17 (p. 1 of 1)
AE
T
_
C
O
R
P
2
6
-
0
1
0
2
4
.
G
P
J
A
E
T
+
C
P
T
+
W
E
L
L
.
G
D
T
1
1
/
5
/
1
5
16
17
12
FILL
COARSE
ALLUVIUM
OR FILL
5" Bituminous pavement
SAND WITH SILT AND GRAVEL, fine to
medium grained, brown, moist, medium dense to
loose (SP-SM) (A-1-b) (possible fill)
END OF BORING
M
M
M
SU
SS
SS
SS
28
19
10
SAMPLEDDEPTH0-4'
1C
4.0
DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL
DR:
4.06.0
DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
None
SB
TIME
9/21/15
WATERLEVEL
LG:
BORINGCOMPLETED:
DS
DATE3.25" HSA
DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
THE ATTACHED
SHEETS FOR AN
EXPLANATION OF
TERMINOLOGY ON
THIS LOG
CASINGDEPTH
9/18/15
CAVE-INDEPTH
Rig:
11:25
Surface Elevation 926.4
Log of Boring No.
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
MC
SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
SAMPLETYPEGEOLOGYDEPTHINFEET WCN PLDEN %-#200LLMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RECIN.
03/2011 01-DHR-060
1
2
3
4
5
6
FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
26-01024
2016 Monticello Street Improvements; Monticello, MN
AET No:
Project:
B-18 (p. 1 of 1)
AE
T
_
C
O
R
P
2
6
-
0
1
0
2
4
.
G
P
J
A
E
T
+
C
P
T
+
W
E
L
L
.
G
D
T
1
1
/
5
/
1
5
18
17
16
FILL
FILL OR
COARSE
ALLUVIUM
5.5" Bituminous pavement
3" FILL, mostly sand with silt, a little gravel,
dark brown (A-1-b) (possible base)
FILL, mostly sand with silt, a little gravel and
clayey sand, light brown and brown (A-1-b)
FILL, mostly sand with silt, a little gravel, light
grayish brown (A-1-b) (may be natural soil)
END OF BORING
Offset 5 feet west and 4 feet north due to utilities
and parked cars.
M
M
M
SU
SS
SS
SS
26
15
16
SAMPLEDDEPTH0-4'
1C
4.0
DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL
DR:
4.06.0
DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
None
SB
TIME
9/21/15
WATERLEVEL
LG:
BORINGCOMPLETED:
DS
DATE3.25" HSA
DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
THE ATTACHED
SHEETS FOR AN
EXPLANATION OF
TERMINOLOGY ON
THIS LOG
CASINGDEPTH
9/21/15
CAVE-INDEPTH
Rig:
11:05
Surface Elevation 926.8
Log of Boring No.
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
MC
SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
SAMPLETYPEGEOLOGYDEPTHINFEET WCN PLDEN %-#200LLMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RECIN.
03/2011 01-DHR-060
1
2
3
4
5
6
FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
26-01024
2016 Monticello Street Improvements; Monticello, MN
AET No:
Project:
B-19 (p. 1 of 1)
AE
T
_
C
O
R
P
2
6
-
0
1
0
2
4
.
G
P
J
A
E
T
+
C
P
T
+
W
E
L
L
.
G
D
T
1
1
/
5
/
1
5
18
6
20
14
11
FILL
FILL OR
COARSE
ALLUVIUM
COARSE
ALLUVIUM
6" Bituminous pavement
8" FILL, mixture of silty sand and clayey sand, a
little gravel, dark brown and black (A-2-4/A-2-6)
(possible base)
FILL, mostly gravelly silty sand, dark brown
(A-1-b)
FILL, mostly sand with gravel, light grayish
brown (A-1-b) (may be natural soil)
FILL, mostly sand, a little gravel, grayish brown
and brown (A-1-b) (may be natural soil)
SAND, a little gravel, fine to medium grained,
light grayish brown, moist, medium dense
(SP-SM) (A-1-b)
END OF BORING
M
M
M
M
M
SU
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
30
30
22
11
20
SAMPLEDDEPTH0-9½'
1C
9.5
DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL
DR:
9.511.0
DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
None
SB
TIME
9/21/15
WATERLEVEL
LG:
BORINGCOMPLETED:
DS
DATE3.25" HSA
DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
THE ATTACHED
SHEETS FOR AN
EXPLANATION OF
TERMINOLOGY ON
THIS LOG
CASINGDEPTH
9/21/15
CAVE-INDEPTH
Rig:
10:20
Surface Elevation 933.8
Log of Boring No.
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
MC
SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
SAMPLETYPEGEOLOGYDEPTHINFEET WCN PLDEN %-#200LLMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RECIN.
03/2011 01-DHR-060
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
26-01024
2016 Monticello Street Improvements; Monticello, MN
AET No:
Project:
B-20 (p. 1 of 1)
AE
T
_
C
O
R
P
2
6
-
0
1
0
2
4
.
G
P
J
A
E
T
+
C
P
T
+
W
E
L
L
.
G
D
T
1
1
/
5
/
1
5
18
23
FILL5.25" Bituminous pavement
FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel, dark
grayish brown, a little brown (A-2-4)
END OF BORING
Split spoon obstructed at 3.9 fet.
M
M
SU
SS
SS
22
5
5
14/.4
SAMPLEDDEPTH0-2'
1C
2.0
DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL
DR:
2.03.9
DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
None
SB
TIME
9/21/15
WATERLEVEL
LG:
BORINGCOMPLETED:
DS
DATE3.25" HSA
DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
THE ATTACHED
SHEETS FOR AN
EXPLANATION OF
TERMINOLOGY ON
THIS LOG
CASINGDEPTH
9/21/15
CAVE-INDEPTH
Rig:
10:45
Surface Elevation 929.4
Log of Boring No.
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
MC
SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
SAMPLETYPEGEOLOGYDEPTHINFEET WCN PLDEN %-#200LLMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RECIN.
03/2011 01-DHR-060
1
2
3
FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
26-01024
2016 Monticello Street Improvements; Monticello, MN
AET No:
Project:
B-21 (p. 1 of 1)
AE
T
_
C
O
R
P
2
6
-
0
1
0
2
4
.
G
P
J
A
E
T
+
C
P
T
+
W
E
L
L
.
G
D
T
1
1
/
5
/
1
5
16
14
16
FILL3.75" Bituminous pavement
FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel and clayey
sand, dark brown, a little brown, water in fill at
about 4 feet (A-2-4)
END OF BORING
Offset 8 feet west due to utilities.
M
M/W
W/M
SU
SS
SS
SS
21
10
10
SAMPLEDDEPTH0-4½'
1C
4.0
4.0
DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL
DR:
5.8
4.7
6.0
6.0
DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
5.1
3.3
SB
TIME
9/21/15
9/21/15
WATERLEVEL
LG:
BORINGCOMPLETED:
DS
DATE3.25" HSA
DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
THE ATTACHED
SHEETS FOR AN
EXPLANATION OF
TERMINOLOGY ON
THIS LOG
CASINGDEPTH
9/21/15
CAVE-INDEPTH
Rig:
11:55
12:15
Surface Elevation 930.7
Log of Boring No.
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
MC
SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
SAMPLETYPEGEOLOGYDEPTHINFEET WCN PLDEN %-#200LLMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RECIN.
03/2011 01-DHR-060
1
2
3
4
5
6
FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
26-01024
2016 Monticello Street Improvements; Monticello, MN
AET No:
Project:
B-22 (p. 1 of 1)
AE
T
_
C
O
R
P
2
6
-
0
1
0
2
4
.
G
P
J
A
E
T
+
C
P
T
+
W
E
L
L
.
G
D
T
1
1
/
5
/
1
5
17
20
21
FILL5" Bituminous pavement
6" FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel, dark
brown (A-1-b) (possible base)
FILL, mostly sand with silt, a little gravel, brown
(A-1-b)
FILL, mostly sand with silt and gravel, a little
lean clay, brown, a little grayish brown (A-1-b)
END OF BORING
M
M
M
M
SU
SU
SS
SS
SS
31
44
30
SAMPLEDDEPTH0-4'
1C
4.0
DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL
DR:
4.06.0
DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
None
SB
TIME
9/21/15
WATERLEVEL
LG:
BORINGCOMPLETED:
DS
DATE3.25" HSA
DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
THE ATTACHED
SHEETS FOR AN
EXPLANATION OF
TERMINOLOGY ON
THIS LOG
CASINGDEPTH
9/21/15
CAVE-INDEPTH
Rig:
1:00
Surface Elevation 936.5
Log of Boring No.
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
MC
SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
SAMPLETYPEGEOLOGYDEPTHINFEET WCN PLDEN %-#200LLMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RECIN.
03/2011 01-DHR-060
1
2
3
4
5
6
FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
26-01024
2016 Monticello Street Improvements; Monticello, MN
AET No:
Project:
B-23 (p. 1 of 1)
AE
T
_
C
O
R
P
2
6
-
0
1
0
2
4
.
G
P
J
A
E
T
+
C
P
T
+
W
E
L
L
.
G
D
T
1
1
/
5
/
1
5
18
24
22
FILL6" Bituminous pavement
FILL, mostly sand with silt and gravel, dark
brown (A-1-b)
FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel, pieces
of concrete, black and dark brown (A-2-6)
END OF BORING
5
15
M
M
M
SU
SS
SS
SS
22
23
7
11
SAMPLEDDEPTH0-4'
1C
4.0
DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL
DR:
4.06.0
DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
None
SB
TIME
9/21/15
WATERLEVEL
LG:
BORINGCOMPLETED:
DS
DATE3.25" HSA
DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
THE ATTACHED
SHEETS FOR AN
EXPLANATION OF
TERMINOLOGY ON
THIS LOG
CASINGDEPTH
9/21/15
CAVE-INDEPTH
Rig:
9:50
Surface Elevation 947.7
Log of Boring No.
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
MC
SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
SAMPLETYPEGEOLOGYDEPTHINFEET WCN PLDEN %-#200LLMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RECIN.
03/2011 01-DHR-060
1
2
3
4
5
6
FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
26-01024
2016 Monticello Street Improvements; Monticello, MN
AET No:
Project:
B-24 (p. 1 of 1)
AE
T
_
C
O
R
P
2
6
-
0
1
0
2
4
.
G
P
J
A
E
T
+
C
P
T
+
W
E
L
L
.
G
D
T
1
1
/
5
/
1
5
17
17
FILL3" Bituminous pavement
8" FILL, mixture of silty sand and clayey sand, a
little gravel, pieces of bituminous, dark brown
and brown (A-1-b, A-2-6) (possible base)
FILL, mostly sand, a little gravel, light brown
(A-1-b)
END OF BORING
Boring terminated at 4 feet due to mechanical
issues with drill rig. See log for Boring B-26B
for reminder of soil profile.
M
M
SU
SS
SS
12
8
SAMPLEDDEPTH0-2'
1C
2.0
DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL
DR:
2.04.0
DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
None
SB
TIME
9/21/15
WATERLEVEL
LG:
BORINGCOMPLETED:
DS
DATE3.25" HSA
DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
THE ATTACHED
SHEETS FOR AN
EXPLANATION OF
TERMINOLOGY ON
THIS LOG
CASINGDEPTH
9/21/15
CAVE-INDEPTH
Rig:
2:30
Surface Elevation 951.4
Log of Boring No.
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
MC
SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
SAMPLETYPEGEOLOGYDEPTHINFEET WCN PLDEN %-#200LLMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RECIN.
03/2011 01-DHR-060
1
2
3
4
FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
26-01024
2016 Monticello Street Improvements; Monticello, MN
AET No:
Project:
B-26A (p. 1 of 1)
AE
T
_
C
O
R
P
2
6
-
0
1
0
2
4
.
G
P
J
A
E
T
+
C
P
T
+
W
E
L
L
.
G
D
T
1
1
/
5
/
1
5
15
12
8
COARSE
ALLUVIUM
OR FILL
COARSE
ALLUVIUM
No samples taken 0-4'. See Boring B-26A for
soil types.
SAND WITH GRAVEL, medium to fine
grained, light brown, moist, loose to medium
dense (SP) (A-1-b) (possible fill)
GRAVELLY SAND, medium to fine grained,
dark brown, moist, loose (SP) (A-1-b) (possible
fill)
END OF BORING
M
M
M
SS
SS
SS
8
17
8
SAMPLEDDEPTH0-9½'
1C
9.5
DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL
DR:
9.511.0
DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
None
SB
TIME
9/23/15
WATERLEVEL
LG:
BORINGCOMPLETED:
DS
DATE3.25" HSA
DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
THE ATTACHED
SHEETS FOR AN
EXPLANATION OF
TERMINOLOGY ON
THIS LOG
CASINGDEPTH
9/23/15
CAVE-INDEPTH
Rig:
10:40
Surface Elevation 951.4
Log of Boring No.
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
MC
SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
SAMPLETYPEGEOLOGYDEPTHINFEET WCN PLDEN %-#200LLMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RECIN.
03/2011 01-DHR-060
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
26-01024
2016 Monticello Street Improvements; Monticello, MN
AET No:
Project:
B-26B (p. 1 of 1)
AE
T
_
C
O
R
P
2
6
-
0
1
0
2
4
.
G
P
J
A
E
T
+
C
P
T
+
W
E
L
L
.
G
D
T
1
1
/
5
/
1
5
17
22
8
8
1
6
15
FILL
COARSE
ALLUVIUM
FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel, trace
roots, dark brown (A-2-4)
FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel, trace
roots, dark brown, a little light brown (A-1-b)
FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel, trace
roots, black (A-6)
FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel and clayey
sand, trace roots, dark brown, a little black
(A-1-b)
FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel and clayey
sand, trace roots, dark brown, a little black
(A-2-4)
SAND WITH GRAVEL, medium to fine
grained, brown, a little grayish brown, moist,
loose (SP) (A-1-b)
SAND, a little gravel, fine to medium grained,
light brown, moist, loose (SP) (A-1-b)
END OF BORING
14
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
6
7
14
5
6
6
10
SAMPLEDDEPTH0-14½'
1C
14.5
DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL
DR:
14.516.0
DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
None
SB
TIME
9/23/15
WATERLEVEL
LG:
BORINGCOMPLETED:
DS
DATE3.25" HSA
DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
THE ATTACHED
SHEETS FOR AN
EXPLANATION OF
TERMINOLOGY ON
THIS LOG
CASINGDEPTH
9/23/15
CAVE-INDEPTH
Rig:
11:25
Surface Elevation 945.5
Log of Boring No.
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
MC
SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
SAMPLETYPEGEOLOGYDEPTHINFEET WCN PLDEN %-#200LLMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RECIN.
03/2011 01-DHR-060
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
26-01024
2016 Monticello Street Improvements; Monticello, MN
AET No:
Project:
B-27 (p. 1 of 1)
AE
T
_
C
O
R
P
2
6
-
0
1
0
2
4
.
G
P
J
A
E
T
+
C
P
T
+
W
E
L
L
.
G
D
T
1
1
/
5
/
1
5
24
24
23
18
8
FILL
TILL OR
FILL
TILL
COARSE
ALLUVIUM
FILL, mostly silty sand, a little gravel, pieces of
bituminous, trace roots, dark brown and black
(A-2-4)
FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel and silty
sand, trace roots, dark brown and brown (A-6)
FILL, mostly clayey sand, a little gravel, pieces
of bituminous, a little silty sand, black and
brown (A-6) (petroleum-type odor)
CLAYEY SAND, a little gravel, dark brown,
firm (SC) (A-2-6) (possible fill)
SANDY LEAN CLAY, a little gravel, brown,
stiff (CL) (A-6)
SAND WITH SILT AND GRAVEL, fine to
medium grained, brown, a little light brown and
dark brown, moist, medium dense, laminations
of silt and sandy silt (SP-SM)
END OF BORING
11
14
16
19
M
M
M
M
M
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
21
12
10
7
17
SAMPLEDDEPTH0-9½'
1C
9.5
DRILLINGFLUID LEVEL
DR:
9.511.0
DEPTH:WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
None
SB
TIME
9/23/15
WATERLEVEL
LG:
BORINGCOMPLETED:
DS
DATE3.25" HSA
DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
THE ATTACHED
SHEETS FOR AN
EXPLANATION OF
TERMINOLOGY ON
THIS LOG
CASINGDEPTH
9/23/15
CAVE-INDEPTH
Rig:
11:55
Surface Elevation 953.6
Log of Boring No.
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
MC
SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
SAMPLETYPEGEOLOGYDEPTHINFEET WCN PLDEN %-#200LLMATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RECIN.
03/2011 01-DHR-060
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
26-01024
2016 Monticello Street Improvements; Monticello, MN
AET No:
Project:
B-28 (p. 1 of 1)
AE
T
_
C
O
R
P
2
6
-
0
1
0
2
4
.
G
P
J
A
E
T
+
C
P
T
+
W
E
L
L
.
G
D
T
1
1
/
5
/
1
5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
0.0010.010.1110100
fineCOBBLES coarse SILT OR CLAY
161410
U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES HYDROMETER
Specimen Identification
Specimen Identification
5
7
coarse
%Clay
1 20
11.0
15.5
Classification Cu
D100
B-24
B-5
%Gravel
81.5 3 4
25.00
12.50
D60
200100
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
1.29
0.86
0.330
0.254
33.0
22.8
56.0
61.7
SAND with SILT and GRAVEL (SP-SM) (A-1-b)
SILTY SAND (SM) (A-2-4)
P
E
R
C
E
N
T
F
I
N
E
R
B
Y
W
E
I
G
H
T
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.4
1/2 3/8
B-24
B-5
23
MC%LL PL PI Cc
21.41.40
medium
U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS
40
fine
D30
GRAVEL
3/4 30 140
D10 %Sand %Silt
SAND
6 705046
AASHTO GRADATION CURVES
AMERICAN
ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC.
9/17/15
2016 Monticello Street Improvements;
Monticello, MN
PROJECT AET JOB NO.
DATE
26-01024
Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review
2016 Street Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota AMERICAN
December 4, 2015 ENGINEERING
AET Report No. 26-01024 TESTING, INC.
Appendix B
Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use
Appendix B
Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use
AET Report No. 26-01024
Appendix B – Page 1 of 2 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC
B.1 REFERENCE
This appendix provides information to help you manage your risks relating to subsurface problems which are caused by
construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. This information was developed and provided by ASFE1, of which, we
are a member firm.
B.2 RISK MANAGEMENT INFORMATION
B.2.1 Geotechnical Services are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects
Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs of their clients. A geotechnical engineering study
conducted for a civil engineer may not fulfill the needs of a construction contractor or even another civil engineer. Because each
geotechnical engineering study is unique, each geotechnical engineering report is unique, p repared solely for the client. No one
except you should rely on your geotechnical engineering report without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer who
prepared it. And no one, not even you, should apply the report for any purpose or project except t he one originally contemplated.
B.2.2 Read the Full Report
Serious problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical engineering report did not r ead it all. Do not rely on an
executive summary. Do not read selected elements only.
B.2.3 A Geotechnical Engineering Report is Based on A Unique Set of Project-Specific Factors
Geotechnical engineers consider a number of unique, project -specific factors when establishing the scope of a study. Typically
factors include: the client’s goals, objectives, and risk management preferences; the general natu re of the structure involved, its
size, and configuration; the location of the structure on the site; and other planned or existing site improvements, such as access
roads, parking lots, and underground utilities. Unless the geotechnical engineer who conducted the study specifically indicates
otherwise, do not rely on a geotechnical engineering report that was:
not prepared for you,
not prepared for your project,
not prepared for the specific site explored, or
completed before important project changes wer e made.
Typical changes that can erode the reliability of an existing geotechnical engineering report include those that affect:
the function of the proposed structure, as when it’s changed from a parking garage to an office building, or from a light
industrial plant to a refrigerated warehouse,
elevation, configuration, location, orientation, or weight of the proposed structure,
composition of the design team, or
project ownership.
As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project changes, even minor ones, and request an assessment of
their impact. Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems that occur because their reports do not
consider developments of which they were not informed.
B.2.4 Subsurface Conditions Can Change
A geotechnical engineering report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was performed. Do not rely on a
geotechnical engineering report whose adequacy may have been affected by: the passage of time; by man-made events, such as
construction on or adjacent to the site; or by natural events, such as floods, earthquakes , or groundwater fluctuations. Always
contact the geotechnical engineer before applying the report to dete rmine if it is still reliable. A minor amount of additional
testing or analysis could prevent major problems.
1 ASFE, 8811 Colesville Road/Suite G106, Silver Spring, MD 20910
Telephone: 301/565-2733: www.asfe.org
Appendix B
Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use
AET Report No. 26-01024
Appendix B – Page 2 of 2 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC
B.2.5 Most Geotechnical Findings Are Professional Opinions
Site exploration identified subsurface conditions only at those points where subsurface tests are c onducted or samples are taken.
Geotechnical engineers review field and laboratory data and then apply their professional judgment to rend er an opinion about
subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual subsurface conditions may differ, sometimes significantly, from t hose indicated
in your report. Retaining the geotechnical engineer who developed your report to provide construction obse rvation is the most
effective method of managing the risks associated with unanticipated conditions.
B.2.6 A Report’s Recommendations Are Not Final
Do not overrely on the construction recommendations included in your report. Those recommendations are not final, because
geotechnical engineers develop them principally from judgment and opinion. Geotechnical engineers can finalize their
recommendations only by observing actual subsurface conditions revealed during construction. The geotechnical engineer who
developed your report cannot assume responsibility or liability for the report’s recommendations if that engineer does not
perform construction observation.
B.2.7 A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Subject to Misinterpretation
Other design team members’ misinterpretation of geotechnical engineering reports has resulted in costly problems. Lower that
risk by having your geotechnical engineer confer with appropriate members of the design tea m after submitting the report. Also
retain your geotechnical engineer to review pertinent elements of the design team’s plans and specifications. Contractors can also
misinterpret a geotechnical engineering report. Reduce that risk by having your geotechnical engineer participate in prebid and
preconstruction conferences, and by providing construction observation.
B.2.8 Do Not Redraw the Engineer’s Logs
Geotechnical engineers prepare final boring and testing logs based upon their interpretation of f ield logs and laboratory data. To
prevent errors or omissions, the logs included in a geotechnical engineering report should never be redrawn for inclusion in
architectural or other design drawings. Only photographic or electronic reproduction is acceptable, but recognizes that separating
logs from the report can elevate risk.
B.2.9 Give Contractors a Complete Report and Guidance
Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can make contractors liable for unanticipated subsurface
conditions by limiting what the y provide for bid preparation. To help prevent costly problems, give contractors the complete
geotechnical engineering report, but preface it with a clearly written letter of transmittal. In the letter, advise contractors that the
report was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the report’s accuracy is limited; encourage them to confer with
the geotechnical engineer who prepared the report (a modest fee may be required) and/or to conduct additional study to obtain
the specific types of information they need or prefer. A prebid conference can also be valuable. Be sure contractors have
sufficient time to perform additional study. Only then might you be in a position to give contractors the best information
available to you, while requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsibi lities stemming from unanticipated
conditions.
B.2.10 Read Responsibility Provisions Closely
Some clients, design professionals, and contractors do not recognize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other
engineering disciplines. This lack of understanding has created unrealistic expectations that have led to disappoi ntments, claims,
and disputes. To help reduce the risk of such outcomes, geotechnical engineers commonly include a variety of explanator y
provisions in their report. Sometimes labeled “limitations” many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers’
responsibilities begin and end, to help others recognize their o wn responsibilities and risks. Read these provisions closely. Ask
questions. Your geotechnical engineer should respond fully and frankly.
B.2.11 Geoenvironmental Concerns Are Not Covered
The equipment, techniques, and personnel used to perform a geoenvironmental study differ significantly from those used to
perform a geotechnical study. For that reason, a geotechnical engineering report does not usually relate any geoenvironmental
findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage ta nks or regulated
contaminants. Unanticipated environmental problems have led to numerous project failures. If you have not yet obtained your
own geoenvironmental information, ask your geotechnical consultant for risk management guidance. Do not rely on an
environmental report prepared for someone else.
550 Cleveland Avenue North | Saint Paul, MN 55114
Phone (651) 659-9001 | (800) 972-6364 | Fax (651) 659-1379 | www.amengtest.com | AA/EEO
RADAR SURVEY OF MONTICELLO CEMETERY
PROJECT: REPORTED TO:
HILLSIDE CEMETERY – RADAR SURVEY WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC.
INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 701 XENIA AVENUE S, SUITE 300
TH 25 & 7TH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
ATTN: ERIC ECKMAN
AET PROJECT NO: 26-01024 DATE: OCTOBER 8, 2015
REVISED: OCTOBER 22, 2015
INTRODUCTION
American Engineering Testing (AET) has completed the radar survey of the above referenced
project.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The city of Monticello wants to make improvements to the intersection at Highway 25 and 7th
Street. WSB Associates requested AET perform a radar survey along the west and south
cemetery edges to document possible unmarked grave locations that could interfere with
proposed intersection construction changes.
TEST PROCEDURES
A GSSI 400MHz radar antenna was used in the collection of the radar scans on site. The radar
antenna was pulled across the ground surface and then scrolled back along the scan line to
indicate the location of buried anomalies on the ground surface. The scans were saved to an
external hard drive and can be viewed on and off site.
Once an embedded object (buried grave, void, utility, etc.) was encountered by the transducing
signal it was reflected back to the receiver and no further penetration beyond that point was
visible in the radar scan. The maximum depth of the radar signal can be between 6 and 8 feet,
depending upon the material type and condition. The presence of clays or water in the soil can
restrict how effectively the radar signal can penetrate into the soil.
RESULTS
We visited the site on September 25, 2015 to collect radar scans. The following is a summary of
our findings:
CONSULTANTS
· ENVIRONMENTAL
· GEOTECHNICAL
· MATERIALS
· FORENSICS
AET Project No. 26-01024 - Page 2 of 3
West End of Cemetery between Fence and TH 25
Radar scans were collected adjacent to the west fence line. One scan was collected from north to
south starting about 64 feet north of the southwest corner and ending at the southwest corner.
The second scan was collected from south to north starting about 90 feet north of the southwest
corner and ending at the northwest corner. The radar equipment documented one anomaly that
was located approximately 58 feet north of the southwest corner of the cemetery near the fence
line at a depth of about 1-1/2 feet below the soil surface.
West End of Cemetery between Fence and First Row of Marked Graves
One radar scan was collected 2 feet east of the west fence line from south to north starting at the
southwest corner and ending at the northwest corner. The radar equipment detected two
anomalies outside of the marked graves located 58 feet (2 feet below the soil surface) and 98 feet
north (2' below the soil surface) of the south fence line. The radar equipment confirmed 7 of the
11 marked graves along this run at depth ranging from 3 to 4 feet below the soil surface.
South End of Cemetery between Fence and Retaining Wall
Four radar scans were collected at a spacing of 5 feet on center from west to east starting about 1
foot south of the south fence line in the southwest corner and ending at the southeast corner. The
radar equipment documented 11 anomalies in the soil at this location.
1 Foot South of Fence Line:
Four anomalies were detected approximately 15 feet (3 feet below soil surface), 34 feet (1-1/2
feet below soil surface), 66 feet (4 feet below soil surface) and 93 feet (3-1/2 feet below soil
surface) east of the south cemetery entrance driveway. No anomalies were detected to the west
of the south cemetery entrance driveway.
5 Feet South of Fence Line:
Three anomalies were detected approximately 32 feet (1-1/2 feet below soil surface), 44 feet (2
feet below soil surface), and 57 feet (4 feet below soil surface) west of the south cemetery
entrance driveway. 2 anomalies were detected 145 feet (3 feet below soil surface) and 169 feet
(3 feet below soil surface) east of the south cemetery entrance driveway.
10 Feet South of Fence Line:
One anomaly was detected about 166 feet (4 feet below soil surface) east of the south cemetery
entrance driveway. No anomalies were detected to the west of the south cemetery driveway.
15 Feet South of Fence Line:
One anomaly was detected adjacent to the retaining wall, 5 feet east of the southwest corner.
This anomaly did not show up in the off-site data analysis so this location may or may not be a
grave site.
South End of Cemetery between Fence and First Row of Marked Graves
One radar scan was collected from west to east about 2 feet north of the south fence line at the
southwest corner and ending at the southeast corner. The radar equipment detected three
anomalies outside of the marked graves located 136 feet (1-1/2 feet below soil surface), 139 feet
(1 foot below soil surface) and 175 feet (1 foot below soil surface) east of the west fence line.
AET Project No. 26-01024 - Page 3 of 3
The radar equipment confirmed 6 of 10 marked grave locations along this run at a depth ranging
from 3 to 4 feet below the soil surface.
The locations of possible grave locations / underground anomalies and confirmed grave locations
were marked onsite with wood stakes painted blue. Wood stakes painted red were placed at
marked grave locations where the radar equipment was not able to document the graves. WSB
had surveyors mark out the staked locations with GPS coordinates after AET personnel left the
site. Sample photos of the marked locations are provided at the end of this report.
LIMITATIONS
Our authorized work scope was limited to our observations in the requested areas only. As such,
our conclusions and recommendations pertain only to those areas observed. Should conditions
differing from those documented by AET at the time our work be found in the future, AET
reserves the right to review our conclusions and recommendations and modify them accordingly.
STANDARD OF CARE
The work performed by American Engineering Testing, Inc., has been conducted in a manner
consistent with that level of skill and care ordinarily exercised by other members of the
profession currently practicing in this area.
REMARKS
It has been a pleasure to have been of service to you on this project. Should you have any
questions or concerns regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Report Prepared By: Report Reviewed By:
American Engineering Testing, Inc. American Engineering Testing, Inc.
Brandon J. Mikelson, EIT Richard J. La Fond, PE
Staff Engineer Principal Engineer
Phone: 651-659-1331 MN Lic. No. 18299
bmikelson@amengtest.com Phone: 651-789-4665
dlafond@amengtest.com
PHOTOS
AET PROJECT NO. 26-01024
Photo 1: Facing West Near South Fence Line – The blue markers are indicative of regions where anomalies were detected in
the soil. The radar equipment detected 4 anomalies in the area west of the cemetery entrance.
Photo 2: Facing North Near the Southwest Corner – The blue marker indicates an anomaly about 58 feet north of the
southwest corner.
PHOTOS
AET PROJECT NO. 26-01024
Photo 3: Facing East Near South Fence Line – 7 anomalies were documented by the radar equipment outside the cemetery east
of the cemetery entrance.
Photo 4: Facing East Near South Fence Line – Marked grave locations where the radar equipment was able to confirm the
grave locations.
PHOTOS
AET PROJECT NO. 26-01024
Photo 5: Facing East Near South Fence Line – Marked grave locations where the radar was unable to confirm the locations of
the graves. Markers at these locations were painted red.
Photo 6: Facing North Near West Fence Line
PHOTOS
AET PROJECT NO. 26-01024
Photo 7: Facing North Near West Fence Line – The marked graves at this location were unconfirmed by the radar equipment.
Feasibility Report
2016 Street Reconstruction Project (Area 5)
Street, Utility, and Appurtenant Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 15C001
WSB Project No. 2596-100
APPENDIX E
Public Input Meeting Sign-in Sheet
Public Comment Summary
2016 Street and Utility
Improvements
City Project 15C001
Accept Feasibility Report and Call
for Public Hearing
December 14, 2015
AGENDA:
Project Overview
Area 5 Street Reconstruction
TH 25/7th Street Intersection Improvements
o Streetscape
o 7th Street Retaining Wall
o Turn lanes/signal improvements
Sidewalk/Trail Connections
Utility Improvements
Estimated Costs/Funding
Assessments
Schedule
Overall Street Reconstruction
Project Location
Project Location
7th St/TH 25 Intersection
Turn Lane/Signal Improvements
7th St/TH 25 Intersection
7th St/TH 25 Intersection
7th St/TH 25 Intersection
7th St/TH 25 Intersection
TH 25\7th Streetscape
7th St Right Turn Lane
7th St Right Turn Lane
TH 25\7th Streetscape
7th St/Cedar St Intersection
TH 25\7th Streetscape
Retaining
Wall
Examples
Redi-Rock®walls create usable land.
Retaining
Wall
Examples
The blue markers are indicative of regions
where anomalies were detected in the soil.
The radar equipment detected four anomalies
in the area west of the cemetery entrance.
The blue marker indicates an
anomaly about 58’ north of
the southwest corner.
FACING WEST NEAR
SOUTH FENCE LINE
FACING NORTH NEAR
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER
FACING EAST NEAR SOUTH FENCE LINE
Seven anomalies were documented by the radar
equipment outside the cemetery east of the
cemetery entrance.
Marked grave locations where the radar equipment
was able to confirm the grave locations.
Sidewalk/Trail Connections
1.7th St Sidewalk Connection
•South side between TH 25 and Cedar St
2.Cedar St sidewalk connection
•West side between 7th St and CSAH 75
3.Washington St
•Trail on west side between R/R and CSAH 75
4.CSAH 75 sidewalk replacement
•20% Replacement
•Original construction –1975
•Pedestrian ramp improvements
•Address crosswalk alignment/visibility at Washington St
5.5th St railroad corridor trail extension
•Washington St to Cedar St
Sidewalk/Trail Connections
Utility Improvements:
•Replace or line all of the sanitary sewer mains
•Replace all of the sanitary sewer services from the
mainline to the property line
•Replace the majority of the sanitary sewer castings
•Replace water main valves and hydrants
•Replace storm sewer pipe and structures and castings
where needed
•Install new storm sewer pipe and structures where
needed to improve drainage conditions
•Replace 6inch watermain with 12-inch on Ramsey St
between 4th St and Broadway
•Extend 10 to 12-inch watermain to feed future water
treatment plant
•Pump house piping improvements for Well #1 and #2
Utility Improvements
Utility Improvements
Costs/Funding:
STREET RECONSTRUCTION -AREA 5
ASSESSMENTS CITY FUNDS* TOTAL
STATE AID
ELIGIBLE
Street $1,224,381 $1,487,449 $2,711,830 $663,300
Sanitary Sewer -$1,161,350 $1,161,350 -
Watermain -$915,890 $915,890 -
Storm Sewer -$223,060 $223,060 $17,850
Pump House
TOTAL $1,224,381 $3,886,249 $5,110,630 $681,150
*City funds include; street reconstruction bonds, capital improvement funds, utility enterprise funds(water) and future
bond issue and advancement of State Aid funds.
Costs/Funding:
TH 25/7TH STREET TURN LANE, SIGNAL AND STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
ASSESSMENT
S CITY FUNDS TOTAL
STATE AID ELIGIBLE
AND MNDOT LOCAL
INITIATIVE FUNDS*
7TH Street
Recon and
Sidewalk (TH 25
to Cedar St)
$43,058.50 $124,321.50 $167,380 $167,380
Turn Lanes and
Signal
Improvements
$0 $1,596,130 $1,596,130 $1,548,040
Total $43,058.50 $1,720,451.50 $1,763,510 $1,715,420
*Includes advancement of State Aid funds up to $1,800,000. MnDOT local initiative funds estimated between
$225,000 and $300,000. MnDOT Landscape partnership provides design assistance and up to $5,000 for plantings.
Costs/Funding:
ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK/TRAIL AND PARKING IMPROVEMENTS
ESTIMATED COST
Broadway St Sidewalk $55,190
4th St Parking Lot $4,600
Cedar St Sidewalk (4th St to 7th St)$96,560*
Cedar St Sidewalk (4th St to Broadway St)$66,390*
Washington St Trail $111,510
TOTAL $334,250
*If the sidewalk along Cedar Street is constructed, an additional $11,149.92 would be collected in assessments
from benefitting non-residential properties @ 25% of the sidewalk cost assessed per City policy
Preliminary Assessments:
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTS
2016 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
STREET RECONSTRUCTION -AREA 5
TYPICAL ASSESSMENT RATE
NO. OF
LOTS FF TOTAL
Residential Assessment $4,500 120 $540,000
Non-Residential Assessment $100/FF 6,843.81 $684,381
TOTAL $1,224,381
Preliminary Assessments:
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTS
2016 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
STREET RECONSTRUCTION AND SIDEWALK –7th St (TH 25 to Cedar St)
TYPICAL ASSESSMENT RATE FF TOTAL
Non-Residential Assessment $100/FF 379.337 $37,937
Non-Residential Sidewalk
Assessment $13.50/FF 6,843.81 $684,381
TOTAL $43,058.50
Assessment Rates:
Street Reconstruction
o Duplex
•considered 2 family home on one parcel
•Subject to $4,500 assessment per unit, $9,000 total
o Multi-Family/Apartments-subject to non-residential rate
o St Peter’s Church
•Parish house considered as 1 residential unit @ $4500
•Remaining frontage –subject to non-residential rate
Sidewalk
o 25% assessed in grid system per City policy
•Waive for residential properties (Cedar St)?
o No assessment for panel replacement on Broadway St
•2 panels replaced at no cost to property owner
per City policy (Broadway St precedent)
Preliminary Assessment Map
Assessment Payment Methods:
Anticipated Assessment Hearing: October 24, 2016
Payment Terms :10 years @ 5 to 6% interest starting in 2017
Option 1
•Pre-pay full assessment amount without interest to the City by
November 23, 2016
Option 2
•Pay assessment with property taxes over a 10-year period at
5 to 6% interest starting in 2017
Project Schedule:
Phase 1 –Feasibility Report
City Council Authorizes Feasibility Study June 22, 2015
Complete Borings and Topographic Survey July/August 2015
Neighborhood Meeting December 2, 2015
City Council Accepts Feasibility Report and Sets Public Hearing Date December 14, 2015
Hold Public Hearing/Order Project/Authorize Preparation of Plans & Specs January 11, 2016
Phase 2 –Final Design
MnDOT State Aid Approval March, 2016
City Council Approves Plans & Specs and Authorizes Ad for Bids March, 2016
Receive Bids April/May, 2016
Award Contract May, 2016
Phase 3 –Construction
Preconstruction Meeting May/June, 2016
Begin Construction June, 2016
Substantial Completion (Washington St completion during non-school times)October 2016
Assessment Hearing October 24, 2016
Council Action:
Decision 1
1. Motion to adopt Resolution #2015-092 accepting the Feasibility
Report and calling for a public hearing on January 11, 2016 for the
2016 Street Reconstruction Project, City Project No. 15C001
2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution #2015-092 at this time.
Decision 2
3. Motion to adopt Resolution #2015-093 authorizing preparation of
plans and specifications and authorize the advertisement of bids
for the 7th Street Retaining Wall, City Project No. 15C001
4. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution #2015-093 at this time.
•Landscaped Street Corridors
•Landscaped Street Corridors
•Landscaped Street Corridors
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
1
4D.ConsiderationofselectingFiberNetthirdpartymanagementservicescandidatesfor
interviewsanddirectingstafftoscheduleinterviewsaccordingly.(JO/RL)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
CityCouncilisaskedtoconsiderselectingFiberNetthirdpartymanagementservices
candidatesforinterviewsanddirectingstafftoscheduleinterviewsaccordingly.
OnOctober26,2015CityCouncilauthorizedstafftomoveforwardwithaRequestfor
Proposalsprocessforidentifyingathirdpartymanagementservicesprovider.Staffwas
askedtoworkwithJoAnneJohnson,theExecutiveDirectoroftheMinnesotaPublic
BroadbandAlliance,topreparethedocumentforrelease.
DuringinitialmeetingswithMs.Johnson,sherecommendedtheCitycreateaRequest
forQualifications(RFQ).Shebelieveditwouldbelesscostlytoprepareandwouldallow
theCitytodeterminehowmanyproviderswouldbeinterestedandqualifiedtoenterinto
amanagementservicesagreement.FollowingtheRFQprocess,theCitywouldhavethe
flexibilitytoutilizeaRequestforProposalsormovedirectlyintonegotiationswith
qualifiedpotentialproviders.
TheRequestforQualificationsdocumentwasapprovedbytheCityCouncilatthe
November23,2015regularmeetingandreleasedtothepublicthenextday.The
documentwaspostedonthecity’swebsiteandsentdirectlytoavarietyofindustry
contactswiththedirectiontopassitalongtoanyoneelsewhomightbeinterestedin
responding.TheRFQresponseswereduebynoononDecember8th,andthecityreceived
responsesfromArvig,ConsolidatedTelecommunicationsCompany,FiberConnect,and
MidAtlanticBroadband.
ElectroniccopiesoftheresponseswereforwardedtoJoAnneJohnsonforevaluation.The
criteriausedintheevaluationprocesswereselectedbyMs.Johnson,andstaffhadan
opportunitytoreviewthecriteriaandmakerecommendationsforthefinalversion.
However,itisimportanttonote,theactualscoringoftheRFQresponseswasdoneby
Ms.Johnson.Sheusedthefollowingweightedcriteria:
ExperiencewiththePartnershipStructure/CLECs25points
UnderstandScopeofWork/MunicipalRules 15points
Professional&TechnicalCompetence/Staffing 15points
NetworkOperationCenterCapability 20points
LocallyBasedOperations/MNCompany 15points
CompliancewithRFQRequirements 5points
AbsenceofConflictsofInterest 5points
Total 100points
Shedeterminedthatbasedonthetotalnumberofpointsavailable,apassingscorewould
be70pointsandabove.Thescoresforthefourrespondentsareattachedassupporting
data.
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
2
Ms.Johnsonofferedthisbriefexplanationofthecriteria:“Theresponseswerescored
accordingtowhatwillgivetheCityanditscitizensthebestservicewiththestrongest
partner.Themostimportantelementofthescorewastheillustrationofexperiencewith
thistypeofpublic-privatepartnership,whichisnewintheindustry,aswellasa
backgroundincompetitiveexchangeoperations,likeFiberNet.Evidenceofan
understandingofwhatthecitywassearchingforalongwithfamiliaritywithmunicipal
andbondingrulesalsorankedhighly.Thecriteriarewardedrespondentswitha‘deep
bench’ofqualifiedandtalentedpersonneltobeassignedtothisprojectandcompanies
withstrongbackgroundsinNetworkOperationsCenters(NOC).”
Ms.Johnsonsummarizedtheevaluationprocessandpresentedtherespondents’scoresto
theFiberNetAdvisoryBoardattheirmeetingonDecember8,2015.Twocompanies
scoredabovethe70pointthresholdandtwocompaniesscoredbelow.Afterdiscussing
theevaluationprocess,theFiberNetAdvisoryBoardrecommendedthatCityCouncil
proceedwithinterviewingtherespondentswiththetoptwoscores:ArvigandCTC.The
boardmembersalsoindicatedtheywouldpreferthattherespondentwiththethirdhighest
score,MidAtlanticBroadband,bekeptasanalternatetobeinterviewedifthetoptwoare
notselected.
Duetothenumberofcandidatesthatsubmittedresponses,conductinganRFPprocess
stillremainsanoption.However,duetotheamountoftimeandfinancialresources
necessaryforanRFPaswellastheresultsoftheRFQ,itappearstomakemoresenseto
interviewthetopcandidatesasasteptowardmoreformalnegotiations.
ThegoaloftheinterviewsessionwillbetoobtaininformationassistingCouncilwith
identifyingthenextstepwhichcouldincludeoneofthefollowing:
•Beginnegotiationswithonecandidate.
•Beginnegotiationswithtwocandidates.
•DirectstafftoprepareaRequestforProposalsformformultiplecandidates.
•Endprocesstofindthirdpartyproviderandcontinuetooperatewithcurrentstaff.
A1.BudgetImpact:
Therewouldbenobudgetimpactassociatedwiththeinterviewprocess.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:
Timeassociatedwithpreparingandexecutingtheinterviewswiththetoptwo
respondents.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoaccepttherecommendationoftheFiberNetAdvisoryBoardtoproceed
withinterviewingthetoptworespondents,ArvigandCTC,andkeepMidatlantic
Broadbandasanalternatetobeinterviewedifthetoptwoarenotselected.The
interviewteamwouldconsistoftheFiberNetAdvisoryBoardandCityCouncil.
Motionbasedonthecriteriaandassociatedpointsystem.
2.Motiontoproceedwithinterviewingacombinationofcandidatesdifferentthan
thoselistedunderAlternative1.
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
3
3.Other
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
InagreementwiththerecommendationofJoAnneJohnsonaswellastheFiberNet
AdvisoryBoard,staffrecommendsproceedingtointerviewthetoptwoRFQ
respondents.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
•OriginalRFQdocumentapprovedonNovember23,2015
•ScoringsummaryfromJoAnneJohnson
Under13.591copiesofresponsesarebeingprovidedtomembersofCouncilunder
separatecoverasnon-publicdatawhichbecomespubliconcenegotiationshave
concluded.Pleasekeepthesedocumentsconfidentialaccordingly.
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS AND SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS:
BROADBAND SYSTEM OPERATION,
MANAGEMENT, AND BUSINESS PARTNERSHIP
Issue Date: November 24, 2015
Title: FiberNet Management Services Initiative
Issuing Agency: City of Monticello, MN
Address: 505 Walnut Street
Suite 1
Monticello, Minnesota 55362
Project Location: Monticello, MN (FiberNet Service Area)
Project Schedule: To be determined
Contact Person: Jeff O’Neill
Monticello City Administrator
505 Walnut Street
Suite 1
Monticello, MN
(763) 271-3215
Jeff.Oneill@ci.monticello.mn.us
2 | Page
PURPOSE
The City of Monticello intends to utilize a 3rd party provider for FiberNet Monticello
system operation and management. This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is issued
with the intent to receive responses from providers who are interested and adequately
qualified to perform the primary project roles as outlined within this document.
INTRODUCTION
FiberNet Monticello is a municipal triple play fiber optic provider serving local
businesses & residents in the growing community of Monticello, MN. Monticello is
located 35 miles from Minneapolis and covers nearly 4 square miles along major
transportation corridors in central Minnesota. Its physical location offers nume rous
advantages to development.
However, despite local commitment to sustain and encourage a competitive place for
business and job development, Monticello was hindered by the presence of poor phone
and internet service. When local incumbent providers rejected requests for improved
service, the City of Monticello elected to support the needs of local businesses with an
innovative plan of its own, operating a telecommunications service as a local public
utility.
Construction began in 2009, and today FiberNet is a city-owned FTTP network
providing high-speed internet, telephone, and video services within the city limits of
Monticello. The system has 1,406 internet customers, 523 telephone customers, and 725
video customers. 815 of these subscribers purchase services in bundled form at
discounted rates.
FiberNet staff is made up of 1 part-time and 7 full-time employees in network
operations, as well as 4 city employees who assist with network business
responsibilities. The governance model features a FiberNet Advisory Board, which is an
appointed committee of five people combining City Council members and city
residents. Major business decisions are made by the City Council with policy guidance
from the advisory board.
3 | Page
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS PROCESS
Anticipated Timeline:
Release Date: November 24, 2015
Due Date: December 8, 2015 by 12pm
Contact for this RFQ:
Jeff O’Neill
City of Monticello
505 Walnut Street, Suite 1
Monticello, MN 55362
Jeff.Oneill@ci.monticello.mn.us
Procedure:
Responses must be received no later than noon on December 8, 2015; they must
also include a cover page and signature page. Responses will follow a double
submission process:
Paper Version: To ensure equal and fair treatment of all respondents,
a paper response is required to be submitted to:
Submission for City of Monticello’s RFQ:
FiberNet Management Services
Monticello City Hall
505 Walnut Street, Suite 1
Monticello, MN 55362
Electronic Version: For ease of evaluation, all respondents must submit
an electronic copy identical to the paper version, in
either Microsoft Word or PDF format, to:
Jeff.Oneill@ci.monticello.mn.us
Questions and Inquiries:
Respondents who have questions about the RFQ should email the above named
contact for this project.
Evaluation Process:
Submissions will be reviewed by staff and the Executive Director of the
Minnesota Public Broadband Alliance, Joanne Johnson. The responses will be
reviewed in terms of various criteria with a report presented to the City
Council. Please note, by submitting a response, the submitter authorizes the
City of Monticello to share the document with Ms. Johnson, including
sections marked confidential.
4 | Page
Submissions will be presented to the Monticello City Council at the regularly
scheduled meeting on December 14, 2015. A decision may or may not be
made at this meeting.
Submissions may be withdrawn prior to the City Council meeting by sending
written notice to Monticello City Hall. Notice of withdrawal must be r eceived
by Thursday, December 10, 2015.
The City of Monticello may, at its discretion, request an interview with any
submitter with notice given via phone or email. Submitter will have two (2)
days to accommodate such an interview.
Depending on the number of submissions, the City may elect to follow the
RFQ with a formal request for proposals. However, an RFQ submittal may be
selected and contractual negotiations may commence. The City of Monticello
will strongly consider all input, but the City ultimately reserves the right to
select a submission at its sole discretion.
The City of Monticello will contact qualified applicants by Friday, December
18, 2015.
The City of Monticello reserves the right to withdraw the entire project or any
project element(s) from award consideration if it is within the best interest of
the City to do so.
Reservations:
The City of Monticello herein expressly reserves the following rights:
To negotiate separately with any source whatsoever in any manner necessary
to serve the best interests of the City. The City does not intend to pay for
information solicited or obtained. The information received will be used in
determining what best serves the interest of the City.
To consider the qualifications, competency, and responsibility of respondents
in awarding any contract.
To make the award based on the City’s best judgement as to which
submission best meets the City’s expectations of a high quality, innovative
partnership.
To negotiate the terms and conditions of the contract, including but not
limited to the statement of work and contract price, in order to meet the C ity’s
expectations.
To make such changes or corrections to the Request for Qualifications as the
City deems necessary or desirable during the process. It is the respondent’s
responsibility to monitor the RFQ throughout the process.
5 | Page
PRIMARY PROJECT ROLES
The intention of this RFQ is to seek out potential partners for the City of Monticello
with the ability help the City achieve its goals of operating a sustainable broadband
network offering the highest level of services at affordable prices to Monticello citizens.
As such, an abbreviated listing of services and responsibilities follows that the City
expects a qualified applicant to show proficiency and experience in fulfilling these tasks
to a high standard of customer service and network reliability.
ROLE OWNER/RESPONSIBLE DESCRIPTION
Physical Network
(Existing) City
City will purchase and
own all fiber, conduit,
drops, and CPE
Provision of Services Network Operator
Delivery expected of
voice, video, and high
speed internet over city
owned fiber
Install Repair Network Operator Timely basis of work
expected
Maintenance Network Operator
Additional equipment
needed for maintenance to
be approved, purchased
and owned by city
Expansion
Within City Limits: City
Outside City Limits:
Network Operator
In accordance with federal
tax regulations, all
network additions within
the City of Monticello
must be owned by the city.
Systems operated outside
the city limits may be
owned by the Operator,
subject to separate
contractual arrangements.
Business Operations Network Operator
Physical business office to
remain open in Monticello
with personnel available
during usual business
hours.
6 | Page
ROLE OWNER/RESPONSIBLE DESCRIPTION
Billing Network Operator
May use current system or
provide one of operator’s
choice.
Regulatory Network Operator
All required regulatory
compliance and reporting
at state and federal levels.
Marketing/Direct Sales Network Operator
Sales efforts within the
city to be done by
salespersons, not limited
to mail or phone
solicitations.
Transport Network Operator
Operator to manage using
city’s current contracts.
Future contracts may be
under Operator control.
Economic Development City & Network Operator
The City and Network
Operator to utilize
telecommunications
services in order to
leverage private
investment and associated
job creation in the
community.
Using the table of requirements and expectations above, please respond with your
experience and the potential activities that would meet these objectives. Please use the
same order of response as the above table. You may expound with any description
length as long as it defines your intent and the background that makes you qualified to
handle these duties. A list of other clients and/or organizations that you currently or
previously served may be added as an appendix to your response to this RFQ as well as
referred to in this section.
MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES DISCLAIMER
All documents, correspondence, etc. between the City of Monticello and potential
respondents is subject to Minnesota Government Data Practices Act guidelines that
govern the release of public data.
Evaluation Criteria Points CTC Arvig MABB FC
Experience w/partnership structure/CLECs 25 25 15 10 5
Understanding Scope of Work/Muni rules 15 15 5 10 5
Professional and Tech Competence/staffing 15 15 15 10 5
Network Operation Center Capability 20 20 20 10 5
Locally based Operations/MN Company 15 15 15 10 7
Compliance with RFQ Requirements 5 5 0 5 0
Absence of Conflicts of Interest 5 5 5 5 0
Totals 100 100 75 60 27
Experience
CTC scored the full 25 points here due to their experience working with public private
partnerships since 2004 along with CLEC operations. Arvig scored for CLEC, but has no
evidence of partnerships, just acquisitions.
Understanding
CTC again showed the best understanding of the project, not surprisingly, since they
have spent considerable time working on similar projects. MABB has negotiated several
video franchises, so got points for municipal knowledge as well as their historical work
with the City.
Competence/Staffing
CTC again received top points by identifying 9 individuals by name who would be
assigned the project along with the company management team and resources. Arvig
has 300 staff across the state of MN, so received points on the assumption that they can
adequately staff with competent talent.
Network Operations Center
Both CTC and Arvig operate their own NOCs in the state of MN which is seen as a
definite positive for both experience and disaster backup potential. (MABB has a NOC in
Virginia, FC does not operate a NOC).
Local Operations/MN Company
Both CTC and Arvig got points for keeping a local office open and being a MN company.
MABB has used local offices in their franchise communities, FC states it subcontracts
technical and local workers.
Compliance with Requirements
CTC and MABB got the points for fully responding in the same order with the requested
items. Arvig sent only a cover letter and its standard marketing material. FC’s response
was more free form and harder to follow.
Absence of Conflicts of Interest
A minor point which only FC fails, by virtue of their past involvement with Fibernet.
Given the scoring, I have no hesitation to recommend CTC as your top partner prospect. I do
feel that interviewing the second ranking compan y, Arvig, is to your benefit also because they
score high enough to qualify for further exploration. They have not given us enough to go on
with their response and the interview process may make it clear that either CTC is your best
choice or that you need to keep talking to both candidates due to Arvig’s performance in
discussions.
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
1
4E.ConsiderationofapprovingCitymatchof$355,000foraPhaseXacquisitionatthe
BertramChainofLakesRegionalPark/YMCACampManitou.(AS)
A.REFERENCEANDBACKGROUND:
TheCityCouncilisaskedtoconsiderauthorizingtheuseofCityfundsforaPhaseX
propertyacquisitionattheBertramChainofLakesRegionalPark.Thismatchrequest
willbethelastfundingrequestrelatedtoacquisitioninthepassiveareaoftheregional
park.
WrightCountywasinformedthatitsFY2016Park&TrailLegacygrantapplicationon
behalfoftheCityandCountyhasbeenselectedforfunding,pendinglegislativeapproval
duringthe2016session.Thegrantapplicationrequestwasfor$2,826,733.The$2.8
milliongrantisthelargestgrantreceivedfortheBertramChainofLakesRegional
Parkprojectto-date.
ThegrantapplicationwasmadefortheacquisitionofthewholeofParcel3.The
propertytotals203landacresandincludesportionsofMudandFirstLakes,alongwitha
portionofOtterCreek.
TheLegacygrantwassubmittedasan80%state/20%localmatchgrantrequest.The
CityCouncilisthereforeaskedtocontributematchingfundsintheamountof$350,000,
plusanestimated$5,000forclosingandappraisalcosts.TheCityCouncilapproveda
resolutioninsupportofthegrantapplicationandlocalmatchcommitmentinOctober
of2015.
TheWrightCountyBoardofCommissionerswillbeaskedtoconsidercommitting
theCounty’sshareofthematchingfundingonTuesday,December15th.
Therequestformatchfundingisbeingbroughtforwardatthistimetofacilitatethe
acquisitionofbothPhasesIXandXin2016.TheCityCouncilpreviouslyapproved
matchfundingofPhaseIXinJulyof2015intheamountof$208,090,includingclosing
andappraisalcosts.Withcompletionofthesetwoacquisitionsin2016,totalacreageof
theparkwillreachapproximately1010landacres.Theacquisitionofpassivelandarea
fortheparkasitwasenvisionedin2008willbecompletedwiththesetwopurchases.
AfterPhasesIXandXareacquired,thelastremainingareaofparklandtobeacquired
includesParcel2andthe1acreremnantofParcel1.Thesetwoparcelstotal40.89acres.
TheCitywillapplyforanOutdoorRecreationgrantinJanuaryof2016forthisacreage
andstaffwouldproposea2017acquisition.
TheCityhascompletedeightpriorpropertyacquisitionsatBertram.ThePhaseVIIand
VIIIacquisitions,totaling92.58landacres,occurredinNovember,2015.Theattached
mapdetailsprioracquisitions.IncludingthePhaseXgrantdesignation,theStateof
Minnesota,throughvariousgrantsources(LCCMR,OutdoorRecreation,Metro
Greenways,LegacyPark&Trail,DNRNon-MetroRegionalParksandothers)has
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
2
funded$11,218,639ofthecostofparkacquisition.TheCityofMonticelloandWright
Countyhaveeachcontributedorcommittedapproximately$4.1milliontoward
acquisitionsatBertramthroughPhaseX.Thisratiorepresentsanapproximately58%
State/21%City/21%Countyfundingsplit.Whenthisprojectbegan,theCityandCounty
wereworkingtowardafundingsplitof33%State/33%City/33%Countyforacquisition
ofthefullregionalpark.ThepassageoftheLegacyamendmenthasgreatlyand
positivelyimpactedthefundingoftheBertramChainofLakesRegionalPark.
StaffwouldalsoliketonotethatWrightCountywasnotifiedthatitsLegacygrant
applicationrequestfor$700,000forparkdevelopmentatBertramwasalsoselectedfor
funding.WrightCountywillcontributeanother$200,000tothesegrantfundsand
proposestocompletethefollowingimprovementswiththedesignatedgrantfundsin
2016:
1.Continuedconstructionofhikingandskitrails,including2pedestrianbridges.
2.Accessroadsandparkingareaconstruction,onthenorthendfordayuse.
3.Restrooms,toincludedchangingarea,septicandutilitiesattheswimmingbeach
4.Picnicshelterconstruction,withutilities,locatedonneartheswimmingbeach
5.Remodelandimproverentalchalet.
6.Constructionofsandvolleyballcourt.locatedneartheswimmingbeach.
TheseimprovementswillenhancetheuseofBertramBeach,whichwasopenedin2015,
aswellasthelargerpark.NoCitymatchisrequiredforthis$700,000developmentgrant
ortheaboveimprovements.
A1.BudgetImpact:ThefundingforthePhaseXpurchase,$355,000,isproposedto
comefromtheClosedBondFundcomponentoftheCapitalProjectsFund.The
CapitalProjectsFundbalancewilltotalapproximately$800,000afterthePhase
IXandPhaseXacquisitions.Thetransferrequestforthisfundingfromthe
CapitalProjectsFundtotheParksFundisincludedinthelistofproposed
transfersintheitemforCouncilconsiderationfor12/14/15.Theacquisitionand
budgetimpactwilloccurin2016.
A2.StaffWorkloadImpact:IftheCityCouncilauthorizesthematchand
acquisition,CitystaffandtheCityAttorneywillworkwithWrightCountyto
draftthenecessarypurchaseagreementdocumentationinpreparationforclosing.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS:
1.MotiontoapproveaCitymatchof$355,000foraPhaseXacquisitionatthe
BertramChainofLakesRegionalPark/YMCACampManitoufor2016
acquisition,pendingfinallegislativeapprovalofgrantaward.
2.Motiontodenygrantmatchfundingfora PhaseXParksandTrailsLegacy
grantatthistime.
CityCouncilAgenda:12/14/15
3
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION:
TheauthorizationtofundthePhaseXgrantmatchfortheBertramChainofLakes
RegionalParkisconsistentwithpreviousCouncilactions,theMonticelloComprehensive
Plan,andwiththeprovisionsoftheapprovedMemorandumofUnderstandingbetween
theCity,CountyandtheYMCA.Assuch,staffsupportfundingthematchforthis
acquisition.
D.SUPPORTINGDATA:
•BertramChainofLakesParcelAcquisitionProgressMap
•2008BertramChainofLakesParcelMap(Parcel#Reference)
•BertramChainofLakeRegionalParkMap
•BertramChainofLakesFundingTable
Current Park Boundary
Pending
Proposed 2017
Phase IX & X
Pending 2016
Current Park
Boundary
Public Parking
5A
5
3
6
7
4
9
8
1 2
12
10
11
Wright County
Parks
Created by: Wright County GIS, Office of the County Surveyor
May, 2008
08001,600400
Feet
Parcel #Land AcresWater AcresTotal Acres% of Value
140.17040.175.90%
239.89039.896.00%
3203.032.33205.3610.90%
4132.7523.96156.7119.60%
5203.9577.61281.56 13.14%
5A104.3339.7144.03 12.26%
6174.640174.645.30%
7121.0948.23169.3211.10%
834.27.9542.1510.20%
99.5746.2755.840.20%
109.8132.3742.180.90%
110.3400.340.00%
1241.870.3342.24.50%
Bertram Chain of Lakes
The YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis
2008 Acquisition
2008 Acquisition
YMCA Owned
O t t e r C r e e k
Forestry
Project
Savanna
Reclamation
Project
Area
Scenic
Overlook
Connection
to City Trail
Connection
to Residential Trail
First
Beaver Pond
Long
Bertram
Mud
Wright County GIS
Office of the County Surveyor
September, 2014
Recreation Site Plan
Bertram
Chain of Lakes
Acquisition
Phase IX
Item #6
01,400700
Feet
Legend
Future Facilities
Owned byOwned by
City of MonticelloCity of Monticello
RuralRural
ResidentialResidential
ResidentialResidential
Agricultural/Agricultural/
CommercialCommercial ResidentialResidential
Trail
AgriculturalAgricultural
AgriculturalAgricultural
Created for:
Future Acquisition
City of Monticello
Amphitheater
Beach
Rental Chalet
Canoe Access
Park Road
Park Road
Trail
Boat Access
Camping
Day Use
Fishing Pier
Park Office
Day Camp Program
Area & Facilities
Existing or Planned
(812.15 Acres)
(50 Acres)
Phase IX
12/9/2015
Phase Land Acres Year Funded Grant $Non-Local Funding Source County $City $Total Status/Result
1 2008 $1,000,000 LCCMR/Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $3,000,000 Completed December, 2008
1 2008 $200,000 DNR-Metro Greenways/Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund $200,000 $200,000 $600,000 Completed December, 2008
1 319 Total 2008 $1,200,000 Parcel 5A, 11 and 6 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $3,600,000
2 40.66 2010 $549,628 DNR-Metro Greenways/Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund $274,814 $274,814 $1,099,256 Completed June 2010
total 40.66 $549,628 Parcel 5B $274,814 $274,814 $1,099,256
3 81.09 Aug-08 $266,249 DNR-Non-Metro Regional Parks/LAWCON (Federal)$148,101 $148,101 $562,451 Completed December 2011
3 Jan-10 $400,000 DNR-Legacy Park/Amendment (Legacy Amendment Funds) (PL09-001)$222,500 $222,500 $845,000 Completed December 2011
3 Sep-10 $334,725 DNR-Non-Metro Regional Parks/LAWCON (Federal)$167,363 $167,363 $669,451 Completed December 2011
3 Sep-10 $76,000 DNR-Legacy Park/Amendment (Legacy Amendment Funds) (PL10-001)$61,299 $61,299 $198,598 Completed December 2011
total 81.09 $1,076,974 Parcel 7 A $599,263 $599,263 $2,275,500
4 61.25 2011-2012 $833,333 $500,000 Legacy Park, $333,333 Non-Metro Regional Park $204,002.00 $204,002.00 $1,241,337.00 Completed December 2014
total 61.25 $833,333 Parcels 12,10, 9 $204,002.00 $204,002.00 $1,241,337.00
5 40.17 2012-2013 $369,713 Outdoor Recreation Grant $317,268.50 $317,268.50 $1,004,250.00 Completed June of 2014
total 40.17 $369,713 Parcel 1, Portion of Parcel 8 $317,268.50 $317,268.50 $1,004,250.00
6 100.32 2013 -2014 $1,528,925 Park Legacy Grant Submitted 9-21-12 - Parcel 7 and 5 $328,288 $328,288 $2,185,500 Completed June of 2014
6 23.61 2013 -2014 $333,333 Regional Park Grant Submitted 9-2-12 - Parcel 8 $144,084 $144,084 $621,501 Completed June of 2014
total 123.93 $1,862,258 $472,372 $472,372 $2,807,001
7 82.75 2015 $1,400,000 Park & Trail Legacy Grant $436,410 $436,410 $2,272,820 Completed November, 2015
total 82.75 $1,400,000 Portion of Parcel 4 $436,410 $436,410 $2,272,820
8 9.63 2015 $100,000 Outdoor Recreation Grant $70,289 $70,289 $240,578 Completed November, 2015
total 9.63 $100,000 Parcel 1, less 1 acre access parcel $70,289 $70,289 $240,578
9 50 2016 $1,000,000 Park & Trail Legacy Grant $200,090 $200,090 $1,400,180
total 50 $1,000,000 Remainder of Parcel 4 (CR39 Frontage)$200,090 $200,090 $1,400,180 Grant awarded, Match approved
10 203.3 2016 $2,826,733 Phase 10 - Parcel 3 (includes Xcel easement credit of $17,100 $350,000 $350,000 $3,526,733 Grant designated pending legislative approval, Match pending
total 203.3 $2,826,733 $350,000 $350,000 $3,526,733
TOTALS (PENDING PH X)1011.78 $11,218,639 $4,124,508 $4,124,508 $19,467,655
11 40.89 2017 $100,000 Future Request, Outdoor Recreation Grant open, apply before March, 2016
total 40.89 $100,000(future request)Parcel 2 (and 1 AC Parcel 1 remaining)$457,750 $457,750 $1,015,500
1052.67 $20,483,155
Phase 11 - 2017 Pending Funding & Acquisition
Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park - Acquisition Project Funding History and Needs
Phase I Funding (2008)
Phase 2 Funding (2010)
Phase 3 Funding (June 2011)
Phase 4 Funding (December, 2013)
Phase 5 Funding (June, 2014)
Phase 6 Funding (June, 2014)
Phase 7 Funding (November, 2015)
Phase 8 Funding (November, 2015)
Phase 9 - Funding - 2016 Pending Acquisition
Phase 10 - 2016 Pending Funding & Acquisition
COUNCIL CONNECTION
DECEMBER 14, 2015
COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Sign Ordinance
Council may recall that in February of 2011, the City adopted an interim ordinance
allowing for an expansion in allowances for temporary signage. The interim ordinance
has been extended each year since that time. In January of 2015, when Council adopted
the interim ordinance for the coming year, staff noted that by statute, interim
ordinances are intended to allow a municipality the opportunity to study as related to
official controls, such as zoning ordinances. It was recommended that the City work
toward amendments to the code in lieu of adopting the interim ordinance again in 2016.
The interim ordinance adopted in January of 2015 expires January 26th, 2016. The
Planning Commission has called for a public hearing on amendments to the temporary
sign provisions of the ordinance for January 5th, 2016 and has outlined some
recommendations for amendments to the ordinance.
Staff will be working with the Chamber of Commerce to gather feedback between now
and January 5th regarding the Planning Commission’s outlined recommendations for
temporary signage. Businesses may also wish to attend the public hearing on January
5th. The Planning Commission’s recommendation will be forward to the City Council
for consideration.
Interchange Land Use Study
At this time, project consultant NAC is looking to gather feedback and direction on the
information prepared thus far on the interchange land use study. The City is
completing a land use evaluation component as part of the overall NW Interchange
Study. Council will note that this study is not a comprehensive planning process, but
rather a land use analysis to inform the transportation planning associated with citing
of a NW interchange or interchanges.
Council Connection – 12/14/15
The Planning Commission and City Council will meet for this interchange land use
feedback session on Thursday, December 17th at 5:00 PM (at City Hall).
The Industrial and Economic Development Committee will also be invited to provide
feedback on this same topic for the morning of Wednesday, December 16th, more than
likely at 7:30 AM. The TAC and EDA members will also be invited to attend this
session.
National Geographic Geotourism Project Progress
Staff and the Chamber of Commerce met on December 7th to outline potential sites for
nomination to the Mississippi River geotourism website. Over the next month, staff
and Chamber reps will be reaching out to these sites to encourage them to nominate to
the site.
In addition, City staff will be working on nominating the City’s tourism sites, including
MCC, Bridge Park, Bertram Park, Water Tower Park, the Great River Trail, and more.
COUNCIL CONNECTION
DECEMBER 14, 2015
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING SAFTEY
Commercial Construction Update
Monticello Crossing (IRET Apartment Building) continues to progress with the
unground parking garage being enclosed. The pre-cast concrete columns, beams and
planking is expected to be completed on or about December 9, 2015. The 2-inch concrete
top-coat is expected to be completed on or about December 14, 2015. On-site
construction of wall panels has been going on since the first part of November.
The volume of work and weather conditions have affected street conditions associated
with the site. Precautions such as 3-inch gravel and rumble strips are in place and there
is a skid steer with a broom attachment on site. Despite the continued cleaning of the
street surface, it is a constant effort by the job Superintendent, the building department,
the street department, and Council Member Posusta to monitor this situation. It was
decided during an on-site meeting that the City would be able to assist with its street
sweeper at a cost of $125/Hr. when needed.
The Mattress Firm/AT&T project has been completed. AT&T has a Certificate of
Occupancy and opened for business just prior to Thanksgiving. The scope of work for
Mattress Firm only included the shell, restrooms, and perimeter walls. The interior
finishes will be completed by a separate contractor. We are not aware of a scheduled
opening date.
Work continues on the phosphorous reduction and digester cover at the Monticello
Waste Water Treatment Facility. The tanks have been set and the roof system
completed.
Auto Zone has submitted documents for a new business to be located at Dundas Rd
and Cedar St just east of SH 25. Construction is expected to begin in the spring of 2016.
COUNCILCONNECTION
DECEMBER,2015
DMV
Transactions
ThroughNovember,theDMVprocessed66,487transactionsor4,023morethanthe
elevenmonthsof2014.DMVyear-todaterevenueincreasedto$490,509.89anincrease
of$28,663.32(6.2%)overthesameperiodlastyear.Pleaseseethefollowingschedules
andgraphsformoredetail.
DMVRECAPCOMPARISONFOR2011-2015 Nov2015
MONTH/
YEAR
Monthly
Transaction
Count
MonthlyTOTAL$
COLLECTED
MonthlyDMV
Revenue
Monthly
Transaction
CountChange
overPriorYear
MonthlyDMV
RevenueChange
overPriorYear
DMVRevenue
Year-to-date
DMVRevenue-
AccumlativeChange
Accumlative
Change%
Transactions
Year-to-date
Transactions
Accumlative
Change
Transactions
Accumlative
Change%
Jan-11 4,858 1,055,111.55$21,371.58$21,371.58$4,858
Jan-12 5,522 1,278,495.17$37,534.44$664 16,162.86$37,534.44$16,162.86$75.6%5,522 664 13.7%
Jan-13 5,633 1,320,990.85$39,764.77$111 2,230.33$39,764.77$2,230.33$5.9%5,633 111 2.0%
Jan-14 5,866 1,446,610.41$40,164.33$233 399.56$40,164.33$399.56$1.0%5,866 233 4.1%
Jan-15 6,408 1,638,758.42$46,375.32$542 6,210.99$46,375.32$6,210.99$15.5%6,408 542 9.2%
Feb-11 4,982 1,032,897.31$27,624.07$48,995.65$9,840
Feb-12 5,652 1,173,015.71$42,748.36$670 15,124.29$80,282.80$31,287.15$63.9%11,174 1,334 13.6%
Feb-13 5,500 1,186,703.62$40,770.21$(152)(1,978.15)$80,534.98$252.18$0.3%11,133 (41)-0.4%
Feb-14 5,817 1,248,557.39$38,910.70$317 (1,859.51)$79,075.03$(1,459.95)$-1.8%11,683 550 4.9%
Feb-15 6,103 1,552,724.23$44,029.96$286 5,119.26$90,405.28$11,330.25$14.3%12,511 828 7.1%
Mar-11 6,097 1,210,709.86$33,573.49$82,569.14$15,937
Mar-12 6,802 1,496,197.56$50,458.91$705 16,885.42$130,741.71$48,172.57$58.3%17,976 2,039 12.8%
Mar-13 5,529 1,287,220.07$36,276.31$(1,273)(14,182.60)$116,811.29$(13,930.42)$-10.7%16,662 (1,314)-7.3%
Mar-14 6,587 1,508,292.16$46,503.21$1,058 10,226.90$125,578.24$8,766.95$7.5%18,270 1,608 9.7%
Mar-15 8,224 1,834,522.51$58,145.73$1,637 11,642.52$148,551.01$12,967.25$18.3%20,735 2,465 13.5%
Apr-11 5,961 1,118,188.94$32,097.64$114,666.78$21,898
Apr-12 5,528 1,311,367.72$44,250.68$(433)12,153.04$174,992.39$60,325.61$52.6%23,504 1,606 7.3%
Apr-13 6,207 1,410,940.74$44,208.19$679 (42.49)$161,019.48$(13,972.91)$-8.0%22,869 (635)-2.7%
Apr-14 6,769 1,545,140.80$49,621.43$562 5,413.24$175,199.67$14,180.19$8.8%25,039 2,170 9.5%
Apr-15 7,138 1,796,965.46$50,202.02$369 580.59$198,753.03$13,336.25$13.4%27,873 2,834 11.3%
May-11 4,851 1,104,176.43$33,919.73$148,586.51$26,749
May-12 5,974 1,177,228.70$37,751.18$1,123 3,831.45$212,743.57$64,157.06$43.2%29,478 2,729 10.2%
May-13 6,378 1,416,908.77$48,814.48$404 11,063.30$209,833.96$(2,909.61)$-1.4%29,247 (231)-0.8%
May-14 6,705 1,570,491.19$47,105.14$327 (1,709.34)$222,304.81$12,470.85$5.9%31,744 2,497 8.5%
May-15 5,789 1,481,427.96$45,042.09$(916)(2,063.05)$243,795.12$21,490.31$9.7%33,662 1,918 6.0%
Jun-11 5,788 1,324,978.77$32,731.90$181,318.41$32,537
Jun-12 5,265 1,234,600.93$43,378.15$(523)10,646.25$256,121.72$74,803.31$41.3%34,743 2,206 6.8%
Jun-13 5,283 1,265,153.04$37,903.81$18 (5,474.34)$247,737.77$(8,383.95)$-3.3%34,530 (213)-0.6%
Jun-14 5,720 1,460,919.68$43,703.24$437 5,799.43$266,008.05$18,270.28$7.4%37,464 2,934 8.5%
Jun-15 6,615 1,888,007.57$47,720.84$895 4,017.60$291,515.96$25,507.91$9.6%40,277 2,813 7.5%
Jul-11 3,783 1,024,904.55$27,597.23$208,915.64$36,320
Jul-12 5,169 1,391,660.81$38,589.10$1,386 10,991.87$294,710.82$85,795.18$41.1%39,912 3,592 9.9%
Jul-13 4,975 1,590,494.35$40,822.05$(194)2,232.95$288,559.82$(6,151.00)$-2.1%39,505 (407)-1.0%
Jul-14 5,848 1,949,275.49$44,599.75$873 3,777.70$310,607.80$22,047.98$7.6%43,312 3,807 9.6%
Jul-15 5,972 1,875,032.63$46,171.09$124 1,571.34$337,687.05$27,079.25$8.7%46,249 2,937 6.8%
Aug-11 5,415 1,568,535.81$38,376.01$247,291.65$41,735
Aug-12 5,043 1,742,588.88$39,507.10$(372)1,131.09$334,217.92$86,926.27$35.2%44,955 3,220 7.7%
Aug-13 4,909 1,594,192.26$38,529.59$(134)(977.51)$327,089.41$(7,128.51)$-2.1%44,414 (541)-1.2%
Aug-14 5,514 1,744,064.13$43,820.89$605 5,291.30$354,428.69$27,339.28$8.4%48,826 4,412 9.9%
Aug-15 5,663 1,750,523.66$42,361.98$149 (1,458.91)$380,049.03$25,620.34$7.2%51,912 3,086 6.3%
Sep-11 4,733 1,607,007.19$33,657.59$280,949.24$46,468
Sep-12 3,862 1,226,543.67$31,889.50$(871)(1,768.09)$366,107.42$85,158.18$30.3%48,817 2,349 5.1%
Sep-13 4,962 1,593,901.77$36,622.06$1,100 4,732.56$363,711.47$(2,395.95)$-0.7%49,376 559 1.1%
Sep-14 4,554 1,521,340.40$35,071.79$(408)(1,550.27)$389,500.48$25,789.01$7.1%53,380 4,004 8.1%
Sep-15 5,337 1,926,111.81$40,759.00$783 5,687.21$420,808.03$31,307.55$8.0%57,249 3,869 7.2%
Oct-11 4,032 1,045,550.78$29,205.57$310,154.81$50,500
Oct-12 4,580 1,217,258.98$36,491.03$548 7,285.46$402,598.45$92,443.64$29.8%53,397 2,897 5.7%
Oct-13 4,375 1,306,661.53$32,969.10$(205)(3,521.93)$396,680.57$(5,917.88)$-1.5%53,751 354 0.7%
Oct-14 4,879 1,745,519.07$38,839.96$504 5,870.86$428,340.44$31,659.87$8.0%58,259 4,508 8.4%
Oct-15 4,888 1,615,667.44$37,245.25$9 (1,594.71)$458,053.28$29,712.84$6.9%62,137 3,878 6.7%
Nov-11 3,752 1,182,584.63$29,130.88$339,285.69$54,252
Nov-12 3,628 1,100,487.25$29,241.07$(124)110.19$431,839.52$92,553.83$27.3%57,025 2,773 5.1%
Nov-13 3,696 1,062,780.01$27,357.25$68 (1,883.82)$424,037.82$(7,801.70)$-1.8%57,447 422 0.7%
Nov-14 4,205 1,213,032.90$33,506.13$509 6,148.88$461,846.57$37,808.75$8.9%62,464 5,017 8.7%
Nov-15 4,350 1,373,939.02$32,456.61$145 (1,049.52)$490,509.89$28,663.32$6.2%66,487 4,023 6.4%
Dec-11 4,005 1,093,117.04$25,931.39$365,217.08$58,257
Dec-12 5,974 1,026,924.27$27,108.50$1,969 1,177.11$458,948.02$93,730.94$25.7%62,999 4,742 8.1%
Dec-13 4,973 1,242,071.18$32,139.83$(1,001)5,031.33$456,177.65$(2,770.37)$-0.6%62,420 (579)-0.9%
Dec-14 4,998 1,549,981.22$35,646.77$25 3,506.94$497,493.34$41,315.69$9.1%67,462 5,042 8.1%
Dec-15 --$-$--$------------------
2011TOTAL 58,257 14,367,762.86$365,217.08$
2012TOTAL 62,999 15,376,369.65$458,948.02$4,742 93,730.94$125,998 4,742
2013TOTAL 62,420 16,278,018.19$456,177.65$(579)(2,770.37)$124,840 (579)-0.5%
2014TOTAL 67,462 18,503,224.84$497,493.34$5,042 41,315.69$134,924 10,084 8.1%
2015TOTAL 66,487 18,733,680.71$490,509.89$4,023 28,663.32$#VALUE!#VALUE!#VALUE!
$29,206
$36,491
$32,969
$38,840 $37,245
$-
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
$40,000
$45,000
November
2011
November
2012
November
2013
November
2014
November
2015
DMVRevenueComparison
3,752
3,628 3,696
4,205
4,350
3,200
3,400
3,600
3,800
4,000
4,200
4,400
4,600
November
2011
November
2012
November
2013
November
2014
November
2015
DMVTransactionComparison
$280,949
$366,107 $363,711 $389,500 $420,808
$-
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
$300,000
$350,000
$400,000
$450,000
November
2011
November
2012
November
2013
November
2014
November
2015
DMVYear-to-DateRevenue
Comparison
46,468 48,817 49,376 53,380 57,249
-
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
November
2011
November
2012
November
2013
November
2014
November
2015
DMVYear-to-DateTransaction
Comparison
COUNCIL CONNECTION
DECEMBER 14, 2015
FIBERNET MONTICELLO
December Subscriber Data
The latest subscriber counts from the December billing period are attached. FiberNet
now has a full year of customer data broken down by services subscribed, and it’s
possible to examine the month to month changes as well as changes over the year as a
whole.
During 2015 staff has seen an increase in total internet customers with decreases in
telephone and television subscribers. Because of this, there was an increase in the total
number of subscribers between January and December 2015 but a decline in the number
of services sold.
Residential&BusinessSubscribers(CustomerCounts)
Service Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec YTDCHG%
PhoneOnly 38 36 34 33 33 33 32 30 29 30 30 31 -7-18.4%
InternetOnly 517 531 546 547 567 577 591 607 612 621 636 646 12925.0%
TelevisionOnly 89 85 82 81 75 75 76 78 77 79 77 77 -12-13.5%
Phone&Internet 171 167 163 167 173 174 170 171 176 169 167 169 -2 -1.2%
Phone&Television 52 51 51 48 51 50 50 51 48 47 45 45 -7-13.5%
Internet&Television 351 345 343 339 331 325 321 319 322 326 322 323 -28 -8.0%
TriplePlay 321 317 312 309 298 298 292 284 282 283 281 278 -43-13.4%
TotalSubscribers 153915321531152415281532153215401546155515581569 30 1.9%
TotalPhone 582 571 560 557 555 555 544 536 535 529 523 523 -59-10.1%
TotalInternet 136013601364136213691374137413811392139914061416 56 4.1%
TotalTelevision 813 798 788 777 755 748 739 732 729 735 725 723 -90-11.1%
TotalServices 2755 2729 2712 2696 2679 2677 2657 2649 2656 2663 2654 2662 -93 -3.4%
Residential&BusinessSubscribers(PercentageofCustomers)
Service Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
PhoneOnly 2.5%2.3%2.2%2.2%2.2%2.2%2.1%1.9%1.9%1.9%1.9%2.0%
InternetOnly 33.6%34.7%35.7%35.9%37.1%37.7%38.6%39.4%39.6%39.9%40.8%41.2%
TelevisionOnly 5.8%5.5%5.4%5.3%4.9%4.9%5.0%5.1%5.0%5.1%4.9%4.9%
Phone&Internet 11.1%10.9%10.6%11.0%11.3%11.4%11.1%11.1%11.4%10.9%10.7%10.8%
Phone&Television 3.4%3.3%3.3%3.1%3.3%3.3%3.3%3.3%3.1%3.0%2.9%2.9%
Internet&Television 22.8%22.5%22.4%22.2%21.7%21.2%21.0%20.7%20.8%21.0%20.7%20.6%
TriplePlay 20.9%20.7%20.4%20.3%19.5%19.5%19.1%18.4%18.2%18.2%18.0%17.7%
TotalSubscribers 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%
TotalPhone 21.1%20.9%20.6%20.7%20.7%20.7%20.5%20.2%20.1%19.9%19.7%19.6%
TotalInternet 49.4%49.8%50.3%50.5%51.1%51.3%51.7%52.1%52.4%52.5%53.0%53.2%
TotalTelevision 29.5%29.2%29.1%28.8%28.2%27.9%27.8%27.6%27.4%27.6%27.3%27.2%
TotalServices 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%
ResidentialandBusinessServiceParticipation(PercentageofCustomers)
Service Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec YTDCHG%
Phone 38%37%37%37%36%36%36%35%35%34%34%33%-4%-12%
TV 53%52%51%51%49%49%48%48%47%47%47%46%-7%-13%
Internet 88%89%89%89%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%2%2%
ResidentialSubscribers(CustomerCounts)
Service JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec YTDCHG%
PhoneOnly 30 28 26 25 24 24 23 22 21 21 20 21 -9-30.0%
InternetOnly 490 499 511 517 534 543 557 571 577 585 600 612 12224.9%
TelevisionOnly 86 82 78 77 72 72 73 76 75 77 76 76 -10-11.6%
Phone&Internet 93 89 91 92 98 101 100 101 103 98 97 97 4 4.3%
Phone&Television 51 50 50 47 50 49 49 50 47 46 44 44 -7-13.7%
Internet&Television 346 340 337 334 329 323 319 317 320 324 319 317 -29 -8.4%
TriplePlay 305 301 298 295 284 285 278 270 268 269 267 264 -41-13.4%
TotalSubscribers 140113891391138713911397139914071411142014231431 30 2.1%
TotalPhone 479 468 465 459 456 459 450 443 439 434 428 426 -53-11.1%
TotalInternet 123412291237123812451252125412591268127612831290 56 4.5%
TotalTelevision 788 773 763 753 735 729 719 713 710 716 706 701 -87-11.0%
TotalServices 2501 2470 2465 2450 2436 2440 2423 2415 2417 2426 2417 2417 -84 -3.4%
Residential(PercentageofCustomers)
Service JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
PhoneOnly 2.1%2.0%1.9%1.8%1.7%1.7%1.6%1.6%1.5%1.5%1.4%1.5%
InternetOnly 35.0%35.9%36.7%37.3%38.4%38.9%39.8%40.6%40.9%41.2%42.2%42.8%
TelevisionOnly 6.1%5.9%5.6%5.6%5.2%5.2%5.2%5.4%5.3%5.4%5.3%5.3%
Phone&Internet 6.6%6.4%6.5%6.6%7.0%7.2%7.1%7.2%7.3%6.9%6.8%6.8%
Phone&Television 3.6%3.6%3.6%3.4%3.6%3.5%3.5%3.6%3.3%3.2%3.1%3.1%
Internet&Television 24.7%24.5%24.2%24.1%23.7%23.1%22.8%22.5%22.7%22.8%22.4%22.2%
TriplePlay 21.8%21.7%21.4%21.3%20.4%20.4%19.9%19.2%19.0%18.9%18.8%18.4%
TotalSubscribers 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%
TotalPhone 19.2%18.9%18.9%18.7%18.7%18.8%18.6%18.3%18.2%17.9%17.7%17.6%
TotalInternet 49.3%49.8%50.2%50.5%51.1%51.3%51.8%52.1%52.5%52.6%53.1%53.4%
TotalTelevision 31.5%31.3%31.0%30.7%30.2%29.9%29.7%29.5%29.4%29.5%29.2%29.0%
TotalServices 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%
ResidentialServiceParticipation(PercentageofCustomers)
Service Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec YTDCHG%
Phone 34%34%33%33%33%33%32%31%31%31%30%30%-4%-13%
TV 56%56%55%54%53%52%51%51%50%50%50%49%-7%-13%
Internet 88%88%89%89%90%90%90%89%90%90%90%90%2%2%
BusinessSubcribers(CustomerCounts)
Service JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec YTDCHG%
PhoneOnly 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 8 8 9 10 10 225.0%
InternetOnly 27 32 35 30 33 34 34 36 35 36 36 34 725.9%
TelevisionOnly 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 -2-66.7%
Phone&Internet 78 78 72 75 75 73 70 70 73 71 70 72 -6 -7.7%
Phone&Television 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0.0%
Internet&Television 5 5 6 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 6 120.0%
TriplePlay 16 16 14 14 14 13 14 14 14 14 14 14 -2-12.5%
TotalSubscribers 138 143 140 137 137 135 133 133 135 135 135 138 0 0.0%
TotalPhone 103 103 95 98 99 96 94 93 96 95 95 97 -6 -5.8%
TotalInternet 126 131 127 124 124 122 120 122 124 123 123 126 0 0.0%
TotalTelevision 25 25 25 24 20 19 20 19 19 19 19 22 -3-12.0%
TotalServices 254 259 247 246 243 237 234 234 239 237 237 245 -9 -3.5%
BusinessSubscribers(PercentageofCustomers)
Service JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
PhoneOnly 5.8%5.6%5.7%5.8%6.6%6.7%6.8%6.0%5.9%6.7%7.4%7.2%
InternetOnly 19.6%22.4%25.0%21.9%24.1%25.2%25.6%27.1%25.9%26.7%26.7%24.6%
TelevisionOnly 2.2%2.1%2.9%2.9%2.2%2.2%2.3%1.5%1.5%1.5%0.7%0.7%
Phone&Internet 56.5%54.5%51.4%54.7%54.7%54.1%52.6%52.6%54.1%52.6%51.9%52.2%
Phone&Television 0.7%0.7%0.7%0.7%0.7%0.7%0.8%0.8%0.7%0.7%0.7%0.7%
Internet&Television 3.6%3.5%4.3%3.6%1.5%1.5%1.5%1.5%1.5%1.5%2.2%4.3%
TriplePlay 11.6%11.2%10.0%10.2%10.2%9.6%10.5%10.5%10.4%10.4%10.4%10.1%
TotalSubscribers 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%
TotalPhone 40.6%39.8%38.5%39.8%40.7%40.5%40.2%39.7%40.2%40.1%40.1%39.6%
TotalInternet 49.6%50.6%51.4%50.4%51.0%51.5%51.3%52.1%51.9%51.9%51.9%51.4%
TotalTelevision 9.8%9.7%10.1%9.8%8.2%8.0%8.5%8.1%7.9%8.0%8.0%9.0%
TotalServices 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%
BusinessServiceParticipation(PercentageofCustomers)
Service Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec YTDCHG%
Phone 75%72%68%72%72%71%71%70%71%70%70%70%-4%-6%
TV 18%17%18%18%15%14%15%14%14%14%14%16%-2%-12%
Internet 91%92%91%91%91%90%90%92%92%91%91%91%0%0%
COUNCIL CONNECTION
DECEMBER 14, 2015
FINANCE DEPARTMENT: HI-WAY LIQUORS
Hi-Way Liquors Sales through November 30, 2015
Please see the attached schedules and charts for total sales and for each major sales
category.
CYM – LYM: Current-year-month sales compared to last-year-month sales. For
example, November sales for this year are 1.9% higher compared to the same month last
year.
Y-T-D: Year-to-Date total sales over the same period last year. For example, Y-T-D sales
for November are 6.6% higher over the same period (January through November) last
year. Positive economic trends and lower fuel prices are providing more discretionary
income for items associated with entertainment or recreation.
Rolling-Twelve-Month Period (RTMP): The chart of RTMP may identify trends earlier
than those based on a calendar year. September (2014) through July (2015) moved the
RTMP up at healthy pace.
The liquor store has upgraded its sales processing software and equipment. The
transition from one system to another has had few glitches. We are working with the
software vendor and credit card processor to determine why some daily payments
don’t reconcile.
Hi-WayLiquorsSalesReport11/30/2015
TotalSales
Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 CYM-LYM Y-T-D
Jan 249,670.43$316,280.10$300,631.85$296,838.64$302,114.52$328,004.13$355,029.76$380,425.45$7.2%7.2%
Feb 255,440.36 284,988.38 285,584.50 315,239.00 307,385.41 337,923.99 333,487.18 347,777.77 4.3%5.8%
Mar 295,257.14 318,050.39 324,062.21 335,032.60 388,195.21 408,071.17 377,391.62 388,003.16 2.8%4.7%
Apr 281,365.81 346,738.34 369,112.88 389,543.24 347,321.09 388,395.50 389,250.82 421,280.89 8.2%5.7%
May 377,177.10 384,337.08 399,489.67 409,309.12 433,829.01 436,195.21 498,095.67 523,401.05 5.1%5.5%
Jun 350,727.93 381,782.23 377,458.15 409,726.07 461,423.68 440,255.04 426,392.73 474,203.81 11.2%6.5%
Jul 409,870.50 430,838.23 466,122.69 466,738.15 447,452.18 485,459.76 479,174.06 542,973.27 13.3%7.7%
Aug 409,575.96 383,523.07 386,245.30 408,734.83 445,158.94 503,181.84 484,955.71 470,505.22 -3.0%6.1%
Sep 317,846.07 346,900.80 346,557.62 373,719.64 390,399.33 379,381.19 397,495.82 439,444.29 10.6%6.6%
Oct 351,268.98 360,742.04 375,367.40 365,702.14 372,676.23 396,328.87 409,967.74 460,096.82 12.2%7.2%
Nov 332,605.88 341,875.49 360,661.96 376,855.40 421,960.12 424,038.37 465,299.53 474,241.74 1.9%6.6%
Dec 436,379.03 454,982.63 485,617.01 505,482.70 527,865.36 518,379.58 549,200.76 -
Total 4,067,185.19$4,351,038.78$4,476,911.24$4,652,921.53$4,845,781.08$5,045,614.65$5,165,741.40$4,922,353.47$
Change 283,853.59$125,872.46$176,010.29$192,859.55$392,693.12$120,126.75$(243,387.93)$
Change%7.0%2.9%3.9%4.1%8.4%2.4%-4.7%
$-
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
Jan Feb MarAprMay Jun Jul Aug Sep OctNov Dec
MonthlyHi-WaySales
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Hi-WayLiquorsSalesReport11/30/2015
Beer
Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 CYM-LYM Y-T-D
Jan 122,218.36$157,849.78$146,246.32$143,906.08$149,406.45$160,903.32$173,814.13$191,370.26$10.1%10.1%
Feb 121,734.33 137,055.23 140,624.54 150,075.08 150,589.28 162,865.75 161,168.63 164,508.11 2.1%6.2%
Mar 138,889.05 155,196.13 164,157.70 163,595.55 203,957.25 192,607.52 185,325.68 192,955.79 4.1%5.5%
Apr 146,613.65 178,834.20 189,978.23 194,504.16 179,486.77 186,134.31 198,195.77 219,756.39 10.9%7.0%
May 201,232.14 210,097.48 223,678.47 208,963.65 227,664.73 234,738.30 256,188.77 259,306.91 1.2%5.5%
Jun 193,801.97 207,793.83 206,043.42 224,769.03 259,671.21 243,389.79 238,322.11 263,421.95 10.5%6.5%
Jul 226,317.96 229,199.79 260,971.50 258,734.60 253,648.64 273,319.54 265,555.32 301,867.65 13.7%8.8%
Aug 226,653.65 203,222.86 211,996.32 216,546.53 242,179.20 281,577.25 267,802.95 253,141.21 -5.5%5.7%
Sep 166,679.60 183,586.32 183,865.70 199,170.24 208,974.88 202,213.80 211,854.94 233,215.56 10.1%6.2%
Oct 176,382.34 179,873.10 190,893.27 180,043.06 187,386.57 191,764.20 210,454.13 234,882.09 11.6%6.7%
Nov 158,322.50 154,584.13 168,265.14 171,866.27 195,276.37 192,162.71 202,081.91 207,055.40 2.5%6.4%
Dec 187,691.06 190,655.19 203,080.13 216,560.71 224,952.83 217,491.21 234,178.12
Total 2,066,536.61$2,187,948.04$2,289,800.74$2,328,734.96$2,483,194.18$2,539,167.70$2,604,942.46$2,521,481.32$
Change 121,411.43$101,852.70$38,934.22$154,459.22$210,432.74$65,774.76$(83,461.14)$
Change%5.9%4.7%1.7%6.6%9.0%2.6%-3.2%
$-
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
$300,000
$350,000
Jan Feb MarAprMay Jun Jul Aug Sep OctNov Dec
MonthlyBeerSales
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Hi-WayLiquorsSalesReport11/30/2015
Liquor
Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 CYM-LYM Y-T-D
Jan 73,930.87$92,370.42$91,472.50$91,279.01$93,085.69$103,977.89$113,943.25$118,577.85$4.1%4.1%
Feb 74,261.89 83,513.27 85,484.92 96,541.21 92,489.93 106,387.16 107,609.55 112,198.85 4.3%4.2%
Mar 78,870.42 88,569.65 93,133.42 101,047.04 112,244.43 124,487.55 116,316.49 118,269.49 1.7%3.3%
Apr 76,735.80 90,627.19 95,025.54 110,898.81 98,080.67 113,594.37 115,579.47 123,841.34 7.1%4.3%
May 103,409.29 102,041.75 106,395.62 111,586.59 114,299.35 127,622.31 135,370.38 140,116.66 3.5%4.1%
Jun 91,805.81 103,580.02 102,086.20 115,136.72 128,604.32 124,019.90 120,291.71 136,716.81 13.7%5.7%
Jul 105,782.85 118,883.98 122,861.98 130,624.19 123,672.73 139,270.04 139,967.77 155,436.54 11.1%6.6%
Aug 106,489.25 103,977.01 101,487.43 113,869.37 126,065.14 141,197.73 138,660.76 136,440.40 -1.6%5.5%
Sep 88,448.34 94,335.50 94,528.17 103,373.64 109,153.56 107,605.71 115,119.19 129,195.42 12.2%6.2%
Oct 97,046.60 102,236.90 102,983.14 103,533.14 106,326.73 116,677.74 124,271.15 140,198.97 12.8%6.8%
Nov 97,348.39 90,996.73 102,298.02 105,501.75 120,127.29 126,412.24 134,241.85 132,261.11 -1.5%6.0%
Dec 135,221.23 143,684.12 153,690.60 159,717.50 172,370.96 175,523.36 184,746.26
Total 1,129,350.74$1,214,816.54$1,251,447.54$1,343,108.97$1,396,520.80$1,506,776.00$1,546,117.83$1,443,253.44$
Change 85,465.80$36,631.00$91,661.43$53,411.82$163,667.03$39,341.83$(102,864.39)$
Change%7.6%3.0%7.3%4.0%12.2%2.6%-6.7%
$-
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$120,000
$140,000
$160,000
$180,000
$200,000
Jan Feb MarAprMay Jun Jul Aug Sep OctNov Dec
MonthlyLiquorSales
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Hi-WayLiquorsSalesReport11/30/2015
Wine
Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 CYM-LYM Y-T-D
Jan 30,700.42$41,810.19$43,324.18$48,437.59$50,238.83$54,949.83$59,391.16$61,128.65$2.9%2.9%
Feb 33,407.17 39,410.85 42,230.84 52,847.05 54,642.27 60,573.12 57,228.51 62,600.47 9.4%6.1%
Mar 47,603.93 45,525.38 46,165.18 54,639.16 57,735.22 77,810.58 66,425.24 67,121.51 1.0%4.3%
Apr 31,755.42 48,303.48 61,146.04 62,289.18 57,973.74 79,736.19 63,101.05 63,285.56 0.3%3.2%
May 38,522.75 40,963.86 45,733.08 68,701.95 78,740.40 62,491.07 92,083.62 109,512.94 18.9%7.5%
Jun 31,796.95 37,522.00 44,211.14 49,089.65 56,607.74 59,523.15 54,270.56 59,036.14 8.8%7.7%
Jul 36,909.44 41,813.65 48,334.93 49,664.45 54,467.20 57,115.44 57,743.98 66,029.11 14.3%8.5%
Aug 35,932.62 41,333.00 46,871.28 53,172.68 61,825.30 64,057.61 62,446.04 63,546.01 1.8%7.7%
Sep 33,830.69 39,798.20 47,859.52 53,916.37 60,317.17 59,121.12 59,409.30 62,210.27 4.7%7.4%
Oct 45,750.04 48,422.79 58,081.87 60,949.40 66,423.82 75,606.28 63,659.41 70,038.32 10.0%7.7%
Nov 50,106.64 66,331.86 71,928.30 85,933.28 97,249.52 96,824.40 117,402.23 122,947.90 4.7%7.2%
Dec 75,866.80 84,285.84 101,676.19 109,267.01 116,610.70 113,008.24 115,617.50
Total 492,182.87$575,521.10$657,562.55$748,907.77$812,831.91$860,817.03$868,778.60$807,456.88$
Change 83,338.23$82,041.45$91,345.22$63,924.14$111,909.26$7,961.57$(61,321.72)$
Change%16.9%14.3%13.9%8.5%14.9%0.9%-7.1%
$-
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$120,000
$140,000
Jan Feb MarAprMay Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
MonthlyWineSales
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
$-
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
$6
Jan
09
Mar
May
Jul
Sep
Nov
Jan
10
Mar
May
Jul
Sep
Nov
Jan
11
Mar
May
Jul
Sep
Nov
Jan
12
Mar
May
Jul
Sep
Nov
Jan
13
Mar
May
Jul
Sep
Nov
Jan
14
Mar
May
Jul
Sep
Nov
Jan
15
Mar
May
Jul
Sep
Nov
Millions
LiquorStoreSales-Rolling12MonthPeriods
COUNCIL CONNECTION
December 14, 2015
PARKS DEPARTMENT
Staff is working on the following tasks listed below:
Chipping requests
Cemetery; selling and locating graves
Locating Riverside grave lot pins
Equipment/vehicle repairs
Park rental setups
Routine building maintenance
Pathway sidewalk tree trimming
Stump grinding
Snow equipment repairs
Park sign repairs
Park sign construction
4th Street epoxy floor install in bathrooms
Updates:
Liquor store: Staff relocated and mounted a new security monitor at liquor store
Pioneer Park Vandalism: On November 24th, the Wright County Sheriff’s Office
apprehended two teen vandals at Pioneer Park. The vandals were busting out the
security lights with a hammer. The cost estimate to repair the damages is $2,000.
Hillside Cemetery: With the 7th Street intersection improvements scheduled for 2016,
soil testing radar equipment located a number of areas with abnormalities of concern.
Staff dug holes to a depth of four feet in the locations indicating possible areas of
concern. Fortunately the investigative holes came up free of any remains; however, a
few areas contained large iron/gravel deposits which could have been what caused the
abnormalities in some of the radar readings.
Council Connection – 12/14/15
Paws for Parks: The Paws for Parks fundraising committee has raised just over $7,200
to date for the future off-leash dog park! They are currently running a Schwan’s
fundraiser from now thru January 3rd. Please visit www.tinyurl.com/schwan-paws to
purchase food items to be delivered to your home. A portion of your purchases and
eGift cards will be given to the park, up to 40%!
Friends of Bertram: The Friends of Bertram Capture the Seasons Photo Contest
deadline has been extended to January 29th, to allow for winter photos to be entered.
Photography enthusiasts are encouraged to enter digital photos in four categories for
each season. A total of $1,000 will be awarded to the winners who will be announced
during the Winter Block Party at the MCC on February 20th. Please visit the Friends of
Bertram website at www.friendsofbertramlakes.org for complete contest details, release
forms and a link to the online entry form.
STREET DEPARTMENT
Shop:
The shop has been busy doing normal maintenance on equipment and vehicles with
other repairs as listed:
DOT truck inspections.
Plow equipment repairs.
Street Sweeper repairs.
Streets:
Blacktop patching in various areas.
Sign maintenance.
Cleaned up at the city compost facility.
Boulevard tree trimming in various areas.
Sign repairs.
Placed Christmas decorations on street lights throughout town.
Snow Plowing
Full crews were dispatched to plow streets on November 30.
The snowfall event accumulated 6.5” of snow.
Street Sweeping:
Due to the warm weather fall street sweeping is ongoing.
Council Connection – 12/14/15
SEWER & WATER DEPARTMENT
The Sewer & Water Department has been working on the following items:
Installing water meter radio readers on Route 8 (which includes the Par West,
Balboul and The Meadows additions) totaling 213 accounts. The goal is to have
all the installations completed by January 4, before water meters are read for the
fourth quarter billing.
Will begin installing water meter radio readers on Route 13 (which includes all of
Cardinal Hills) totaling 274 accounts. The goal is to have all the installations
completed by April 4, before water meters are read for the first quarter billing.
Equipment and building maintenance.
Proofing as-builts on GIS system.
Working on the sanitary sewer cleaning maintenance schedule for 2016 which
will be the Southwest quadrant.
Working on the water main valves and fire hydrants maintenance schedule for
2016 which will be the southwest quadrant.
Calibrating all water meters form the townhomes developments. There are 38
water meters ranging from 1 to 2 inch meters. Staff will also be calibrating all 24
City water meters on irrigation systems.
Working on the Wellhead Protection Program with WSB for the City of
Monticello.
Working on as-builts for the next core city project for 2016.
COUNCIL CONNECTION
DECEMBER 14, 2015
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT: Sewage Fund Equipment Auction
Earlier in the year, the council declared bio-solid equipment as surplus property. This
specialized equipment was used to spread wastewater treatment sludge. The city now
employs screw press technology and the sludge is landfilled.
The equipment was placed on the auction site Big Iron with a closing date of December
2nd. Big Iron is large auction site with active bidders in 48 states. Indeed, item was sole
to a Nebraska bidder. The results are as follow:
Item Number Bids Sales Price
Terra-Gator (1998) 69 $41,250
Polar Ti Tanker (1998) 31 $22,750
Sludge Tank Truck (1981) 62 $18,900
Applicator Truck (1981) 42 $14,250
Total $97,150
The city netted $88,156 after selling costs are deducted. The proceeds from the sale will
be recorded in the Sewage Fund. The contribution of Tom Moores cannot go
unrecognized. Mr. Moores researched various auction sites and worked with Big Iron
representatives to make sure that the concerns of the site and bidders were addressed.
The equipment was stored at the wastewater treatment plant. The newly vacant space
will be used to address other storage needs.
COUNCIL CONNECTION
DECEMBER 14, 2015
ADMINISTRATION
Donation to the Monticello Help Center
Megan Walsh from the firm of Greene Espel reported that Judge Frank issued the final
order in the Dean v. Monticello matter. After making the payments to the class
members, there was approximately $36,000 in unclaimed funds. A small amount of this
is due to people not cashing checks, but the majority of the remaining funds were set
aside to be used for disputed claims. The claims agent determined that a few of the
disputed claims were not meritorious.
Judge Frank’s order approves the distribution of the funds to the Monticello Food Shelf,
which is how we agreed any remaining funds would be used. I spoke with the Director
today, and she was speechless about this unforeseen donation. Please let me know if
you have any questions. This is truly the last step in the case.
Made by Page 1 of 15
Monticello Monthly Report 2015 Printed on December 2, 2015
Incident Start Date/Time Incident Type Case Number How Reported
911 Hang-up Total: 3
11/05/15 18:34 911 Hang-up WCSOP15067520 911
11/06/15 16:34 911 Hang-up WCSOP15067609 911
11/30/15 16:07 911 Hang-up WCSOP15069706 911
Abandoned Vehicle Total: 1
11/30/15 11:56 Abandoned Vehicle WCSOP15069680 Phone
Agency Assist Total: 18
11/01/15 07:44 Agency Assist WCSOP15067082 Phone
11/01/15 12:41 Agency Assist WCSOP15067101
11/01/15 21:46 Agency Assist WCSOP15067149 Phone
11/02/15 00:13 Agency Assist WCSOP15067153 Phone
11/03/15 10:13 Agency Assist WCSOP15067282
11/08/15 15:57 Agency Assist WCSOP15067792 Phone
11/10/15 22:30 Agency Assist WCSOP15067999 Phone
11/13/15 12:47 Agency Assist WCSOP15068202 911
11/13/15 13:33 Agency Assist WCSOP15068209 Phone
11/13/15 15:53 Agency Assist WCSOP15068228
11/16/15 11:33 Agency Assist WCSOP15068438 Phone
11/18/15 13:00 Agency Assist WCSOP15068619 Phone
11/22/15 18:41 Agency Assist WCSOP15069048 Phone
11/22/15 20:23 Agency Assist WCSOP15069055 Phone
11/24/15 20:18 Agency Assist WCSOP15069251 Phone
11/27/15 19:13 Agency Assist WCSOP15069471 911
11/30/15 09:57 Agency Assist WCSOP15069668 Phone
11/30/15 18:48 Agency Assist WCSOP15069734 Phone
Alarm Total: 24
11/03/15 00:27 Alarm WCSOP15067258 Phone
11/03/15 20:34 Alarm WCSOP15067351 Phone
11/04/15 14:11 Alarm WCSOP15067413 Phone
11/05/15 02:09 Alarm WCSOP15067465 Phone
11/12/15 00:33 Alarm WCSOP15068082 Phone
11/12/15 01:13 Alarm WCSOP15068084 Phone
11/12/15 01:37 Alarm WCSOP15068085 Phone
11/12/15 03:47 Alarm WCSOP15068087 Phone
11/12/15 21:47 Alarm WCSOP15068166 Phone
11/12/15 22:04 Alarm WCSOP15068169 Phone
11/14/15 08:43 Alarm WCSOP15068285 Phone
11/17/15 08:36 Alarm WCSOP15068514 Phone
Made by Page 2 of 15
Incident Start Date/Time Incident Type Case Number How Reported
11/17/15 17:14 Alarm WCSOP15068560 Phone
11/17/15 20:05 Alarm WCSOP15068574 Phone
11/19/15 03:32 Alarm WCSOP15068686 Phone
11/20/15 03:49 Alarm WCSOP15068777 Phone
11/20/15 23:02 Alarm WCSOP15068870 Phone
11/21/15 07:42 Alarm WCSOP15068891 Phone
11/21/15 08:47 Alarm WCSOP15068898 Phone
11/21/15 19:06 Alarm WCSOP15068952 Phone
11/22/15 19:50 Alarm WCSOP15069052 Phone
11/24/15 07:48 Alarm WCSOP15069183 Phone
11/25/15 10:07 Alarm WCSOP15069285 Phone
11/29/15 23:20 Alarm WCSOP15069652 Phone
Alarm Commercial General Total: 4
11/26/15 15:40 Alarm Commercial General WCSOP15069397 Phone
11/29/15 16:03 Alarm Commercial General WCSOP15069621 Phone
11/30/15 08:34 Alarm Commercial General WCSOP15069662 Phone
11/30/15 18:42 Alarm Commercial General WCSOP15069733 Phone
Alarm Residential Medical Total: 1
11/30/15 18:51 Alarm Residential Medical WCSOP15069736 Phone
Animal Total: 6
11/01/15 17:18 Animal WCSOP15067119 Phone
11/07/15 15:35 Animal WCSOP15067699 Phone
11/08/15 22:20 Animal WCSOP15067819 Phone
11/14/15 14:32 Animal WCSOP15068313 Phone
11/22/15 09:01 Animal WCSOP15068994 Phone
11/22/15 13:42 Animal WCSOP15069019 Phone
Animal - Abuse Total: 3
11/09/15 22:56 Animal - Abuse WCSOP15067912 Phone
11/13/15 13:01 Animal - Abuse WCSOP15068206 Phone
11/29/15 22:56 Animal - Abuse WCSOP15069651 Phone
Animal - Barking Dog Total: 3
11/01/15 18:23 Animal - Barking Dog WCSOP15067125 Phone
11/10/15 04:44 Animal - Barking Dog WCSOP15067923 911
11/27/15 12:04 Animal - Barking Dog WCSOP15069443 Phone
Animal - Bites - Attacks Total: 1
11/12/15 12:55 Animal - Bites - Attacks WCSOP15068118 Phone
Assault Total: 5
11/02/15 13:32 Assault WCSOP15067196 Phone
11/05/15 22:59 Assault WCSOP15067535 911
11/24/15 13:54 Assault WCSOP15069215 Phone
11/25/15 01:27 Assault WCSOP15069272 911
11/28/15 19:13 Assault WCSOP15069549 911
Made by Page 3 of 15
Incident Start Date/Time Incident Type Case Number How Reported
ATL Total: 1
11/19/15 11:42 ATL WCSOP15068715 Phone
Burglary Total: 2
11/06/15 07:23 Burglary WCSOP15067544 Phone
11/23/15 01:20 Burglary WCSOP15069068 Phone
Check Welfare Total: 23
11/01/15 21:40 Check Welfare WCSOP15067148
11/01/15 22:45 Check Welfare WCSOP15067151 Phone
11/05/15 10:20 Check Welfare WCSOP15067485 Phone
11/06/15 11:37 Check Welfare WCSOP15067574 Phone
11/06/15 14:45 Check Welfare WCSOP15067594 Phone
11/06/15 16:43 Check Welfare WCSOP15067613 911
11/07/15 11:14 Check Welfare WCSOP15067678 Phone
11/08/15 14:54 Check Welfare WCSOP15067788 Phone
11/10/15 12:00 Check Welfare WCSOP15067936 Phone
11/10/15 12:54 Check Welfare WCSOP15067951 Phone
11/10/15 12:54 Check Welfare WCSOP15067952
11/12/15 11:43 Check Welfare WCSOP15068112 Phone
11/14/15 12:37 Check Welfare WCSOP15068304 Phone
11/15/15 12:20 Check Welfare WCSOP15068376 Phone
11/15/15 18:07 Check Welfare WCSOP15068399 Phone
11/16/15 07:08 Check Welfare WCSOP15068424 Phone
11/16/15 16:02 Check Welfare WCSOP15068457 Phone
11/19/15 04:28 Check Welfare WCSOP15068691 Phone
11/20/15 12:59 Check Welfare WCSOP15068802 Phone
11/20/15 22:00 Check Welfare WCSOP15068863 Phone
11/23/15 11:03 Check Welfare WCSOP15069092 Phone
11/24/15 12:59 Check Welfare WCSOP15069211 Phone
11/24/15 21:46 Check Welfare WCSOP15069259 911
Citizen Aid Total: 13
11/05/15 17:39 Citizen Aid WCSOP15067518 Phone
11/06/15 02:37 Citizen Aid WCSOP15067538 911
11/06/15 13:06 Citizen Aid WCSOP15067583 911
11/12/15 14:54 Citizen Aid WCSOP15068126 Phone
11/15/15 12:39 Citizen Aid WCSOP15068380 911
11/16/15 20:56 Citizen Aid WCSOP15068488 Phone
11/17/15 20:25 Citizen Aid WCSOP15068576 Phone
11/22/15 03:58 Citizen Aid WCSOP15068985 Phone
11/23/15 21:09 Citizen Aid WCSOP15069158 Phone
11/23/15 22:12 Citizen Aid WCSOP15069163 Phone
11/24/15 16:52 Citizen Aid WCSOP15069231 Phone
11/25/15 17:43 Citizen Aid WCSOP15069323 Phone
11/25/15 21:18 Citizen Aid WCSOP15069343 Phone
Made by Page 4 of 15
Incident Start Date/Time Incident Type Case Number How Reported
Civil Complaint Total: 24
11/01/15 18:33 Civil Complaint WCSOP15067127 Phone
11/03/15 18:03 Civil Complaint WCSOP15067336 Phone
11/05/15 12:40 Civil Complaint WCSOP15067496 Phone
11/09/15 19:19 Civil Complaint WCSOP15067898 Officer
11/11/15 07:52 Civil Complaint WCSOP15068016 Phone
11/11/15 13:55 Civil Complaint WCSOP15068040
11/11/15 19:29 Civil Complaint WCSOP15068071 Phone
11/13/15 11:25 Civil Complaint WCSOP15068196 Phone
11/13/15 13:06 Civil Complaint WCSOP15068208 Phone
11/13/15 15:13 Civil Complaint WCSOP15068220 Phone
11/14/15 09:59 Civil Complaint WCSOP15068289 Phone
11/16/15 12:09 Civil Complaint WCSOP15068440 Phone
11/16/15 16:33 Civil Complaint WCSOP15068461 Other
11/17/15 19:29 Civil Complaint WCSOP15068570 Phone
11/18/15 06:30 Civil Complaint WCSOP15068598 Phone
11/20/15 17:23 Civil Complaint WCSOP15068832 Phone
11/21/15 08:17 Civil Complaint WCSOP15068895 Phone
11/21/15 12:49 Civil Complaint WCSOP15068919 Phone
11/21/15 22:35 Civil Complaint WCSOP15068968 Phone
11/23/15 12:53 Civil Complaint WCSOP15069108 Phone
11/26/15 12:17 Civil Complaint WCSOP15069383 911
11/28/15 13:00 Civil Complaint WCSOP15069522 Phone
11/30/15 10:06 Civil Complaint WCSOP15069670 Phone
11/30/15 10:47 Civil Complaint WCSOP15069672 Phone
Court Order Violation Total: 2
11/06/15 16:34 Court Order Violation WCSOP15067612 Phone
11/12/15 10:50 Court Order Violation WCSOP15068106 Phone
Criminal Damage to Property Total: 6
11/02/15 17:21 Criminal Damage to Property WCSOP15067224 Phone
11/03/15 07:38 Criminal Damage to Property WCSOP15067271 Phone
11/04/15 15:25 Criminal Damage to Property WCSOP15067417 Phone
11/22/15 19:44 Criminal Damage to Property WCSOP15069050 911
11/24/15 11:56 Criminal Damage to Property WCSOP15069205 Phone
11/24/15 22:11 Criminal Damage to Property WCSOP15069261 Phone
Death Investigation - Undetermined Total: 1
11/13/15 19:33 Death Investigation - Undetermined WCSOP15068243 Phone
Disabled Vehicle Total: 2
11/20/15 23:05 Disabled Vehicle WCSOP15068871
11/23/15 17:30 Disabled Vehicle WCSOP15069138 Phone
Disorderly Total: 10
11/02/15 17:42 Disorderly WCSOP15067226 Phone
11/04/15 23:05 Disorderly WCSOP15067456 911
Made by Page 5 of 15
Incident Start Date/Time Incident Type Case Number How Reported
11/05/15 00:59 Disorderly WCSOP15067462 911
11/06/15 18:22 Disorderly WCSOP15067617 911
11/06/15 21:28 Disorderly WCSOP15067637 911
11/17/15 00:22 Disorderly WCSOP15068494 911
11/22/15 22:52 Disorderly WCSOP15069064 911
11/28/15 02:14 Disorderly WCSOP15069493 911
11/28/15 11:01 Disorderly WCSOP15069512 Phone
11/29/15 05:26 Disorderly WCSOP15069577 911
Domestic Disturbance Total: 13
11/01/15 14:48 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP15067111 Phone
11/02/15 17:19 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP15067222 Phone
11/06/15 20:00 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP15067629 911
11/07/15 21:12 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP15067727 911
11/08/15 20:42 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP15067816 911
11/12/15 15:25 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP15068130 Phone
11/14/15 16:49 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP15068322 Phone
11/17/15 21:53 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP15068585 911
11/18/15 21:48 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP15068666 Phone
11/19/15 04:30 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP15068688 911
11/20/15 21:37 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP15068859 Phone
11/24/15 00:30 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP15069171 911
11/29/15 14:04 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP15069607 Phone
Drugs Total: 6
11/03/15 00:16 Drugs WCSOP15067257 Phone
11/13/15 20:55 Drugs WCSOP15068251 Phone
11/16/15 17:40 Drugs WCSOP15068471 Phone
11/21/15 11:52 Drugs WCSOP15068910 Phone
11/21/15 23:51 Drugs WCSOP15068975 Phone
11/23/15 11:48 Drugs WCSOP15069105 Phone
DUI Total: 3
11/02/15 20:21 DUI WCSOP15067243
11/14/15 12:00 DUI WCSOP15068298 Phone
11/29/15 00:50 DUI WCSOP15069571 Officer
Explosion Total: 1
11/28/15 20:36 Explosion WCSOP15069553 Phone
Extra Patrol Total: 1
11/22/15 18:04 Extra Patrol WCSOP15069045 Phone
Fire - Gas Leak Total: 2
11/12/15 06:28 Fire - Gas Leak WCSOP15068091 Phone
11/25/15 20:39 Fire - Gas Leak WCSOP15069339 911
Fire - Grass Total: 1
11/28/15 15:53 Fire - Grass WCSOP15069534 Phone
Made by Page 6 of 15
Incident Start Date/Time Incident Type Case Number How Reported
Fire - Other Total: 1
11/01/15 10:11 Fire - Other WCSOP15067089 Phone
Fire - Vehicle Total: 1
11/02/15 18:42 Fire - Vehicle WCSOP15067233 Phone
Fraud - Checks Total: 1
11/06/15 15:05 Fraud - Checks WCSOP15067616 Phone
Fraud - Checks - Cards Total: 3
11/07/15 18:32 Fraud - Checks - Cards WCSOP15067713 911
11/10/15 14:28 Fraud - Checks - Cards WCSOP15067964 911
11/18/15 14:51 Fraud - Checks - Cards WCSOP15068631 Phone
Fraud - Forgery Total: 5
11/05/15 19:55 Fraud - Forgery WCSOP15067524 Phone
11/12/15 09:18 Fraud - Forgery WCSOP15068102 Phone
11/13/15 09:38 Fraud - Forgery WCSOP15068192 Phone
11/24/15 16:16 Fraud - Forgery WCSOP15069229 Phone
11/30/15 12:03 Fraud - Forgery WCSOP15069683 Phone
Fraud - Internet Total: 3
11/03/15 17:45 Fraud - Internet WCSOP15067332 Phone
11/04/15 11:49 Fraud - Internet WCSOP15067394 Phone
11/24/15 19:47 Fraud - Internet WCSOP15069249 Phone
Funeral Escort Total: 2
11/09/15 10:24 Funeral Escort WCSOP15067846 Phone
11/27/15 10:50 Funeral Escort WCSOP15069440 Phone
Harassment Total: 6
11/04/15 07:11 Harassment WCSOP15067372 Phone
11/17/15 16:32 Harassment WCSOP15068558 Phone
11/22/15 09:40 Harassment WCSOP15068998 Phone
11/22/15 15:53 Harassment WCSOP15069034 Phone
11/24/15 11:20 Harassment WCSOP15069207 Phone
11/24/15 15:40 Harassment WCSOP15069222 Phone
Info Total: 1
11/23/15 06:30 Info WCSOP15069117
Intoxicated Person Total: 3
11/04/15 17:52 Intoxicated Person WCSOP15067429 Phone
11/22/15 03:18 Intoxicated Person WCSOP15068984 Phone
11/23/15 22:55 Intoxicated Person WCSOP15069167 911
Juvenile - Complaint Total: 14
11/01/15 19:09 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP15067134 Phone
11/02/15 17:15 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP15067220 Phone
11/07/15 10:48 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP15067670 Phone
Made by Page 7 of 15
Incident Start Date/Time Incident Type Case Number How Reported
11/07/15 16:32 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP15067703 Phone
11/09/15 18:10 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP15067893 Phone
11/12/15 21:21 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP15068162 Phone
11/21/15 23:02 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP15068970 Phone
11/22/15 17:40 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP15069042 911
11/23/15 18:52 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP15069146 Phone
11/25/15 13:20 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP15069297 Phone
11/25/15 22:33 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP15069346 Phone
11/26/15 18:35 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP15069405 911
11/28/15 20:24 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP15069552 Phone
11/29/15 18:30 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP15069635 Phone
Lost - Found Property Total: 13
11/04/15 21:07 Lost - Found Property WCSOP15067444
11/07/15 04:32 Lost - Found Property WCSOP15067652
11/08/15 14:13 Lost - Found Property WCSOP15067783
11/09/15 08:57 Lost - Found Property WCSOP15067841
11/10/15 12:58 Lost - Found Property WCSOP15067953
11/13/15 15:38 Lost - Found Property WCSOP15068224 911
11/17/15 15:54 Lost - Found Property WCSOP15068550
11/18/15 00:42 Lost - Found Property WCSOP15068591
11/23/15 10:37 Lost - Found Property WCSOP15069087
11/25/15 19:17 Lost - Found Property WCSOP15069332
11/26/15 09:19 Lost - Found Property WCSOP15069373
11/26/15 20:54 Lost - Found Property WCSOP15069414
11/30/15 12:33 Lost - Found Property WCSOP15069684
Medical - Abdominal Pain Total: 4
11/11/15 06:24 Medical - Abdominal Pain WCSOP15068011 911
11/11/15 16:05 Medical - Abdominal Pain WCSOP15068052 911
11/12/15 16:06 Medical - Abdominal Pain WCSOP15068133 Phone
11/18/15 07:55 Medical - Abdominal Pain WCSOP15068600 911
Medical - Bleeding - Lacerations Total: 2
11/01/15 18:56 Medical - Bleeding - Lacerations WCSOP15067130 911
11/02/15 14:13 Medical - Bleeding - Lacerations WCSOP15067202 911
Medical - Breathing Problems Total: 6
11/13/15 20:13 Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP15068248 911
11/19/15 15:50 Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP15068737 911
11/23/15 13:47 Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP15069114 911
11/24/15 06:15 Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP15069177 911
11/24/15 06:30 Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP15069180 911
11/27/15 15:23 Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP15069451 911
Medical - Carbon Monoxide Inhalation Total: 1
11/03/15 06:53 Medical - Carbon Monoxide
Inhalation
WCSOP15067269 Phone
Made by Page 8 of 15
Incident Start Date/Time Incident Type Case Number How Reported
Medical - Chest Injury Total: 1
11/15/15 09:41 Medical - Chest Injury WCSOP15068370 911
Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet Total: 10
11/01/15 00:01 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP15067063 911
11/07/15 22:53 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP15067736 911
11/09/15 13:27 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP15067862 Phone
11/19/15 07:31 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP15068699 Phone
11/21/15 12:21 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP15068914 Phone
11/23/15 11:52 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP15069097 Phone
11/28/15 11:37 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP15069515 Phone
11/28/15 15:54 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP15069535 911
11/29/15 07:28 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP15069578 Phone
11/29/15 10:40 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP15069595 Phone
Medical - Non Emergency Transport Total: 1
11/16/15 08:48 Medical - Non Emergency Transport WCSOP15068429 Phone
Medical - Overdose - Poisoning Total: 1
11/25/15 23:33 Medical - Overdose - Poisoning WCSOP15069352 911
Medical - Psychiatric - Behavioral Total: 9
11/01/15 19:04 Medical - Psychiatric - Behavioral WCSOP15067132 Phone
11/02/15 23:13 Medical - Psychiatric - Behavioral WCSOP15067253 Phone
11/03/15 22:23 Medical - Psychiatric - Behavioral WCSOP15067359 911
11/19/15 15:21 Medical - Psychiatric - Behavioral WCSOP15068734 Phone
11/20/15 17:44 Medical - Psychiatric - Behavioral WCSOP15068835 911
11/21/15 15:43 Medical - Psychiatric - Behavioral WCSOP15068932 Phone
11/22/15 08:47 Medical - Psychiatric - Behavioral WCSOP15068992 Phone
11/23/15 13:42 Medical - Psychiatric - Behavioral WCSOP15069113 911
11/28/15 10:02 Medical - Psychiatric - Behavioral WCSOP15069508 Phone
Medical - Seizure Total: 3
11/10/15 16:26 Medical - Seizure WCSOP15067974 911
11/20/15 00:30 Medical - Seizure WCSOP15068771 911
11/23/15 21:27 Medical - Seizure WCSOP15069160 Phone
Medical - Sick Total: 13
11/02/15 10:59 Medical - Sick WCSOP15067182 911
11/05/15 13:17 Medical - Sick WCSOP15067498 911
11/06/15 06:54 Medical - Sick WCSOP15067543 911
11/08/15 19:13 Medical - Sick WCSOP15067810 911
11/09/15 09:57 Medical - Sick WCSOP15067843 911
11/12/15 16:44 Medical - Sick WCSOP15068141 911
11/16/15 18:21 Medical - Sick WCSOP15068477 911
11/17/15 07:17 Medical - Sick WCSOP15068510 911
11/22/15 09:55 Medical - Sick WCSOP15068999 911
11/29/15 10:18 Medical - Sick WCSOP15069593 911
11/29/15 17:56 Medical - Sick WCSOP15069633 911
Made by Page 9 of 15
Incident Start Date/Time Incident Type Case Number How Reported
11/30/15 12:02 Medical - Sick WCSOP15069682 911
11/30/15 13:05 Medical - Sick WCSOP15069690 911
Medical - Stroke Total: 3
11/13/15 11:36 Medical - Stroke WCSOP15068197 911
11/24/15 10:46 Medical - Stroke WCSOP15069199 911
11/29/15 17:11 Medical - Stroke WCSOP15069626 911
Medical - Unconscious - Fainting Total: 4
11/03/15 18:17 Medical - Unconscious - Fainting WCSOP15067341 911
11/15/15 13:21 Medical - Unconscious - Fainting WCSOP15068384 Phone
11/17/15 20:27 Medical - Unconscious - Fainting WCSOP15068578 911
11/28/15 21:04 Medical - Unconscious - Fainting WCSOP15069558 911
Medical - Unknown Total: 2
11/14/15 22:20 Medical - Unknown WCSOP15068345 911
11/21/15 23:07 Medical - Unknown WCSOP15068971 911
Missing Person Total: 2
11/08/15 13:05 Missing Person WCSOP15067780 Phone
11/16/15 16:24 Missing Person WCSOP15068460 Phone
Motorist Aid Total: 6
11/05/15 11:03 Motorist Aid WCSOP15067489 Officer
11/10/15 18:51 Motorist Aid WCSOP15067990 Phone
11/17/15 11:02 Motorist Aid WCSOP15068528 Phone
11/21/15 17:55 Motorist Aid WCSOP15068945 911
11/24/15 17:50 Motorist Aid WCSOP15069239 Phone
11/29/15 18:52 Motorist Aid WCSOP15069638 911
MVA - Car Deer Total: 4
11/09/15 06:17 MVA - Car Deer WCSOP15067834
11/10/15 01:53 MVA - Car Deer WCSOP15067921 911
11/15/15 23:00 MVA - Car Deer WCSOP15068414
11/22/15 22:35 MVA - Car Deer WCSOP15069062
MVA - Hit & Run Total: 2
11/04/15 04:36 MVA - Hit & Run WCSOP15067368
11/24/15 20:51 MVA - Hit & Run WCSOP15069254
MVA - No Injuries Total: 20
11/02/15 09:16 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP15067174
11/03/15 14:35 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP15067312
11/04/15 16:35 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP15067426
11/06/15 07:58 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP15067548
11/07/15 11:08 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP15067676
11/07/15 12:19 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP15067687 911
11/07/15 12:53 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP15067688 Phone
11/09/15 10:05 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP15067844 Phone
11/10/15 17:02 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP15067980
Made by Page 10 of 15
Incident Start Date/Time Incident Type Case Number How Reported
11/11/15 11:29 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP15068030
11/14/15 11:12 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP15068295
11/18/15 16:03 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP15068639
11/18/15 16:06 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP15068644
11/19/15 15:13 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP15068733
11/25/15 16:05 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP15069311
11/30/15 16:55 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP15069710
11/30/15 17:10 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP15069713
11/30/15 18:57 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP15069739
11/30/15 19:31 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP15069742
11/30/15 20:19 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP15069746
Neighborhood Dispute Total: 2
11/19/15 23:51 Neighborhood Dispute WCSOP15068770 Phone
11/23/15 12:20 Neighborhood Dispute WCSOP15069102 Phone
Noise Total: 4
11/02/15 00:42 Noise WCSOP15067155 Phone
11/08/15 00:49 Noise WCSOP15067740
11/08/15 03:17 Noise WCSOP15067750
11/26/15 20:12 Noise WCSOP15069412
Off-Road Vehicle Complaint Total: 1
11/03/15 16:32 Off-Road Vehicle Complaint WCSOP15067327
Open Door - Window Total: 3
11/12/15 04:24 Open Door - Window WCSOP15068088
11/27/15 01:04 Open Door - Window WCSOP15069428
11/29/15 08:25 Open Door - Window WCSOP15069582
Ordinance Violation Total: 1
11/05/15 14:03 Ordinance Violation WCSOP15067501
Parking Total: 3
11/04/15 17:46 Parking WCSOP15067439 Phone
11/17/15 06:36 Parking WCSOP15068506
11/28/15 21:02 Parking WCSOP15069556 911
Public Disturbance Total: 1
11/03/15 08:55 Public Disturbance WCSOP15067275 Phone
Pursuit Total: 1
11/18/15 16:05 Pursuit WCSOP15068642 Officer
Snowmobile Complaint Total: 1
11/30/15 20:07 Snowmobile Complaint WCSOP15069744 Phone
Stalking Total: 1
11/18/15 23:28 Stalking WCSOP15068674 Phone
Made by Page 11 of 15
Incident Start Date/Time Incident Type Case Number How Reported
Stolen - Property Total: 1
11/11/15 14:34 Stolen - Property WCSOP15068044 Officer
Stolen - Vehicle Total: 2
11/13/15 19:41 Stolen - Vehicle WCSOP15068249 Phone
11/21/15 10:41 Stolen - Vehicle WCSOP15068903 911
Stoparm Violation Total: 1
11/02/15 16:22 Stoparm Violation WCSOP15067213 Phone
Suspicious - Circumstances Total: 28
11/01/15 14:48 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15067112 Phone
11/01/15 18:55 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15067131 Phone
11/02/15 11:41 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15067186 Phone
11/03/15 18:21 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15067340 Phone
11/05/15 21:07 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15067527 911
11/06/15 08:01 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15067549 911
11/06/15 12:48 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15067580 Phone
11/06/15 21:02 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15067634 Phone
11/08/15 20:59 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15067817 Phone
11/08/15 23:28 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15067824 Phone
11/10/15 17:47 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15067987 Phone
11/12/15 14:03 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15068123 Phone
11/12/15 15:37 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15068131 911
11/12/15 17:54 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15068148 Phone
11/15/15 12:29 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15068379 Phone
11/18/15 16:02 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15068646 Phone
11/18/15 23:20 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15068673 Phone
11/20/15 20:35 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15068853 911
11/23/15 07:18 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15069071 Phone
11/23/15 14:20 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15069122 Phone
11/24/15 16:10 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15069227 Phone
11/28/15 16:15 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15069539 Phone
11/28/15 19:05 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15069548 Phone
11/28/15 21:53 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15069559 Phone
11/29/15 09:58 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15069589 Phone
11/29/15 12:23 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15069601 Phone
11/30/15 21:37 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15069750 Phone
11/30/15 22:25 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP15069754 Phone
Suspicious - Item Total: 1
11/12/15 08:50 Suspicious - Item WCSOP15068099 Phone
Suspicious - Person - Vehicle Total: 30
11/01/15 02:33 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15067075 Phone
11/02/15 15:17 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15067210
11/03/15 03:08 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15067263 Phone
11/03/15 15:56 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15067323 Phone
Made by Page 12 of 15
Incident Start Date/Time Incident Type Case Number How Reported
11/04/15 09:42 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15067379 Phone
11/07/15 10:46 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15067672 Phone
11/07/15 16:45 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15067706 Phone
11/08/15 22:34 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15067820 Phone
11/09/15 17:28 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15067883 Phone
11/09/15 22:29 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15067910 Phone
11/11/15 07:46 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15068015 Phone
11/11/15 17:32 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15068062 Phone
11/11/15 21:39 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15068076 Phone
11/14/15 01:08 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15068267 Officer
11/15/15 18:33 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15068401 Phone
11/17/15 21:47 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15068584 911
11/20/15 16:44 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15068827 Phone
11/20/15 19:59 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15068849 Phone
11/20/15 22:59 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15068869 Phone
11/20/15 23:26 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15068872 Phone
11/21/15 12:33 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15068917 Phone
11/21/15 23:11 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15068973 911
11/23/15 16:35 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15069129 911
11/24/15 15:46 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15069225 Phone
11/25/15 15:02 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15069304 Phone
11/26/15 02:22 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15069362 Phone
11/26/15 03:47 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15069364 Phone
11/27/15 02:01 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15069429 Phone
11/28/15 21:01 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15069557 Phone
11/29/15 16:28 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP15069622 Phone
Theft Total: 25
11/01/15 15:22 Theft WCSOP15067113 Phone
11/02/15 13:33 Theft WCSOP15067195 Phone
11/03/15 16:57 Theft WCSOP15067329 Phone
11/03/15 17:00 Theft WCSOP15067330 Phone
11/06/15 09:32 Theft WCSOP15067559 Phone
11/06/15 15:08 Theft WCSOP15067599 Phone
11/06/15 15:35 Theft WCSOP15067601 Phone
11/07/15 08:43 Theft WCSOP15067662 Phone
11/07/15 17:48 Theft WCSOP15067711 911
11/09/15 07:17 Theft WCSOP15067836 911
11/09/15 12:46 Theft WCSOP15067856 Phone
11/09/15 16:25 Theft WCSOP15067877
11/12/15 11:05 Theft WCSOP15068109 Phone
11/14/15 22:17 Theft WCSOP15068344 911
11/17/15 16:14 Theft WCSOP15068554 Phone
11/19/15 14:59 Theft WCSOP15068731 Phone
11/20/15 19:12 Theft WCSOP15068846 Phone
11/20/15 19:35 Theft WCSOP15068848 Phone
11/20/15 20:08 Theft WCSOP15068851 911
Made by Page 13 of 15
Incident Start Date/Time Incident Type Case Number How Reported
11/20/15 20:10 Theft WCSOP15068852 Phone
11/23/15 17:23 Theft WCSOP15069137 Phone
11/23/15 19:06 Theft WCSOP15069149 Phone
11/24/15 09:57 Theft WCSOP15069197 Phone
11/24/15 10:49 Theft WCSOP15069201 Phone
11/24/15 12:30 Theft WCSOP15069208 Phone
Theft - From Vehicle Total: 1
11/13/15 12:09 Theft - From Vehicle WCSOP15068198 Phone
Theft - Gas Drive Off Total: 11
11/04/15 11:29 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP15067393 911
11/09/15 10:40 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP15067849 911
11/19/15 10:23 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP15068706 911
11/20/15 15:09 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP15068820 911
11/23/15 09:54 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP15069083 911
11/24/15 08:30 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP15069189 911
11/25/15 15:13 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP15069305 911
11/28/15 12:20 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP15069519 911
11/28/15 16:43 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP15069541 911
11/29/15 17:54 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP15069632 911
11/30/15 07:30 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP15069661 Phone
Theft - Identity Theft Total: 1
11/07/15 09:07 Theft - Identity Theft WCSOP15067665 Phone
Theft - Shoplifting Total: 4
11/04/15 13:53 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP15067410 Phone
11/17/15 14:48 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP15068546 Phone
11/18/15 18:43 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP15068652 Phone
11/20/15 11:37 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP15068798 Phone
Threats Total: 3
11/03/15 23:22 Threats WCSOP15067362 911
11/16/15 17:40 Threats WCSOP15068473 Phone
11/16/15 17:49 Threats WCSOP15068475 Phone
Traffic - Complaint Total: 21
11/05/15 19:21 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP15067523 911
11/08/15 14:01 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP15067782 Phone
11/08/15 19:59 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP15067812 Phone
11/09/15 15:53 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP15067874 Phone
11/11/15 05:07 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP15068010 911
11/11/15 17:15 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP15068059 Phone
11/12/15 15:40 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP15068132 Phone
11/12/15 21:38 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP15068167 Phone
11/13/15 21:20 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP15068253 911
11/15/15 10:01 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP15068371 Phone
11/20/15 15:29 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP15068821 Phone
Made by Page 14 of 15
Incident Start Date/Time Incident Type Case Number How Reported
11/21/15 14:09 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP15068928 Phone
11/21/15 22:25 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP15068965 911
11/24/15 11:56 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP15069203 Phone
11/24/15 12:42 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP15069209 Phone
11/24/15 21:57 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP15069260 Phone
11/25/15 11:44 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP15069290 Phone
11/25/15 17:19 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP15069321 911
11/26/15 06:45 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP15069367 Phone
11/28/15 18:51 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP15069546 Phone
11/30/15 07:08 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP15069660 Phone
Traffic - Hazard Total: 2
11/01/15 13:54 Traffic - Hazard WCSOP15067106 Phone
11/29/15 15:45 Traffic - Hazard WCSOP15069618 Phone
Traffic Stop Total: 21
11/01/15 01:39 Traffic Stop WCSOP15067070 Officer
11/01/15 18:14 Traffic Stop WCSOP15067124 Officer
11/03/15 01:57 Traffic Stop WCSOP15067262 Officer
11/04/15 13:19 Traffic Stop WCSOP15067406 Officer
11/05/15 11:31 Traffic Stop WCSOP15067493 Officer
11/08/15 02:43 Traffic Stop WCSOP15067749 Officer
11/09/15 23:11 Traffic Stop WCSOP15067916 Officer
11/10/15 01:32 Traffic Stop WCSOP15067919 Officer
11/10/15 13:44 Traffic Stop WCSOP15067959 Officer
11/11/15 07:21 Traffic Stop WCSOP15068013 Officer
11/13/15 00:40 Traffic Stop WCSOP15068171 Officer
11/13/15 13:57 Traffic Stop WCSOP15068211 Officer
11/18/15 00:47 Traffic Stop WCSOP15068592 Officer
11/22/15 18:15 Traffic Stop WCSOP15069044 Officer
11/24/15 22:58 Traffic Stop WCSOP15069267 Officer
11/25/15 22:42 Traffic Stop WCSOP15069348 Officer
11/26/15 02:41 Traffic Stop WCSOP15069363 Officer
11/26/15 09:15 Traffic Stop WCSOP15069372 Officer
11/28/15 01:21 Traffic Stop WCSOP15069490 Officer
11/30/15 02:09 Traffic Stop WCSOP15069658 Officer
11/30/15 13:20 Traffic Stop WCSOP15069693 Officer
Train Incident Total: 1
11/29/15 07:50 Train Incident WCSOP15069580 Phone
Trespass Total: 1
11/15/15 15:05 Trespass WCSOP15068390 Phone
Unwanted Person Total: 1
11/18/15 20:34 Unwanted Person WCSOP15068661 Phone
Walk Away Total: 1
11/27/15 16:23 Walk Away WCSOP15069458 Phone
Made by Page 15 of 15
Incident Start Date/Time Incident Type Case Number How Reported
Warrant - Arrest Total: 6
11/01/15 17:36 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP15067120 Officer
11/06/15 11:42 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP15067582 Officer
11/07/15 14:54 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP15067695 Phone
11/10/15 02:52 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP15067922 Officer
11/21/15 16:58 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP15068940 Phone
11/29/15 12:22 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP15069602 Phone
Warrant - Attempt Total: 1
11/10/15 16:14 Warrant - Attempt WCSOP15067972 Officer
Total Records: 508