City Council Agenda Packet 04-25-2016 SpecialAGENDA
CITY COUNCIL QUARTERLY WORKSHOP MEETING
MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, March 28, 2016 — 5 p.m.
Academy Room
AGENDA
1. 95th Street Extension
2. Flashing Yellow Arrows at Mayor Intersections
A
WSBInfrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite #300
& Assaciales, Inc.
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763 541 -4800
Fax: 763 541 -1700
Memorandum
To: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator
Angela Schumann, AICP, Com m u n ity Developm en t Director
Shibani Bisson, P. E., City Engineer
City of Monticello
From: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE, Transportation Engineer
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Date: April 25, 2016
Re: Project Update
951 Street Extension — Gillard Avenue to Broadway
City of Monticello
WSB Project No: 1627 -99
Back;4round
At the November 23, 2015 meeting the City Council authorized WSB to proceed with the
Feasibility Report addressing the extension of 95th Street between Gillard Avenue and Broadway
Street. City Council requested that prior to proceeding with the full Feasibility Report, an update
be provided in order for the Council to determine if they want to proceed with completing the
Feasibility Report. The primary concerns of the City Council were:
• Impacts to adjacent properties
• Safety of access to /from Gillard Avenue at CR 39
• Cost of the 95th Street extension
• Benefit of the 95th Street extension
The purpose of this agenda item is to provide the Council with an update on our preliminary
findings and receive direction on proceeding with the full Feasibility Report or an alternate
recommendation.
Traffic Analysis
A traffic analysis was completed documenting the existing traffic conditions along Gillard
Avenue and projecting future traffic conditions with and without the proposed 95th Street
extension. Existing Average Daily Traffic (ADT), AM peak hour and PM peak hour volumes
were collected the week of January 18, 2016. Turning movement counts were also collected at
the intersections of Gillard Avenue and CR 39, Gillard Avenue and River Forest Drive and
Gillard Avenue at 95th Street. Based on the existing traffic counts the following was concluded:
95' Street Extension — Gillard Avenue to Broadway
April 25, 2016
Page 2 of 6
• Existing (2016) ADT on Gillard Avenue is between 1,620 and 1,850 vehicles per
day. Previous traffic counts were conducted in 2001 on Gillard Avenue. Those
counts ranged from 1050 to 1200. The primary reason for the increase over the 15
year period is the development of the Sunset Ponds area.
• 85% to 90% of the traffic entering or exiting CR 39 at Gillard Avenue has an
origin or destination in the City of Monticello (i.e. left turning from Gillard
Avenue to CR 39 or right turn from CR 39 to Gillard Avenue).
• Traffic on Gillard Avenue is not using River Forest Drive as a cut - through
avoiding the CR 39 intersection.
• Currently there is not a significant traffic generation impacting Gillard Avenue
from the area east on 95th Street or Haug Avenue.
In addition to documenting the existing traffic conditions, future projected traffic conditions
were determined for the impacted roadways. Future conditions were determined assuming traffic
being generated from the area east of Gillard Avenue to Harding Avenue would use 90th Street
and Haug Avenue to 95th Street. With these assumptions and assuming that the Sunset Ponds
development is fully occupied, it was estimated that an additional 1,200 daily trips would enter
the roadway system. Based on this additional traffic the future traffic projections on Gillard
Avenue and 95th Street were determined.
The results show that with full build out of the area east of Gillard Avenue the following
conditions could occur:
Without the 95th Street extension, traffic on Gillard Avenue would increase from
between 1,620 and 1850 ADT today to between 2,500 and 2,750 ADT, depending
on the location along Gillard Avenue.
With the 95th Street extension, traffic on 95th Street is estimated to be 1,500 ADT.
With the 95th Street extension, traffic on Gillard Avenue would decrease from
between 1,620 and 1,850 ADT today to between 900 and 1,100 ADT depending
on the location along Gillard Avenue.
The attached Traffic Volume Figure shows the existing traffic volumes and the projected future
daily ADT volumes with and without the 95th Street extension.
A typical local City street would have traffic volumes up to 1,200 vpd. Traffic volumes higher
than 1,200 vpd are typical for collector type streets. Traffic capacity of a two lane roadway is up
to 5,000 vpd depending on; the topography, locations of driveways and streets intersecting the
roadway, condition of the roadway, rural or urban cross - section and speed of traffic. Considering
Gillard Avenue is in need of pavement rehabilitation, the existing traffic volume of 1,620 vpd to
1,850 vpd is approaching a critical level. However, if the roadway was improved (pavement
rehabilitation, possible addition of curb and gutter etc.) the critical level could be in the range of
2,000 vpd to 2,500 vpd.
95' Street Extension — Gillard Avenue to Broadway
April 25, 2016
Page 3 of 6
Comparable City streets with similar traffic volumes are:
• Broadway east of CR 18/39 — 2050 vpd
• Fenning Avenue south of School Blvd — 1800 vpd
• Fallon Avenue south of Chelsea Rd — 1750 vpd
• Street north of 7th Ave — 1450 vpd
• Innsbrook Dr south of Chelsea Rd — 1850 vpd (estimated- no counts have been
taken)
Preliminary 95t' Street Roadway Alignment Options and Pedestrian Connections
Two preliminary roadway alignment options were developed extending 95th Street from where it
currently ends just west of Gillard Avenue, to Broadway within the existing MnDOT right of
way, taking into consideration construction of a potential future noise wall with the expansion of
I -94 to three lanes.
Option 1 — Noise wall located south of 95th St alignment, adjacent to I -94
Option 2 — Noise Wall located north of 95th Street alignment, adjacent to
residential properties
The attached figures show both options. Each option assumes a 28 foot wide, two lane section
and provides for pedestrian connections from Broadway to 95th Street and Mill Trail Lane. In
addition, both options also include the addition of approximately 20 parking stall adjacent to the
roadway at River Mill Park. Based on these preliminary concept plans the following was
concluded:
• Both alternatives have right of way and/or easement impacts to the adjacent
residents. The property impacts were reduced by utilizing a 28 foot wide street
compared to the City standard 32 foot wide street. Option 2 with the noise wall
adjacent to the residential property would have more impact.
• The noise wall adjacent to I -94 (Option 1) will provide better noise reduction at a
lower cost then the option adjacent to the residential properties. This is primarily
due to the height and location of the proposed walls.
• The preliminary roadway and trail construction cost is estimated to be
approximately $1.1 million excluding right of way /easements or the noise wall.
• The noise wall cost is estimated to range from approximately $500,000 to
$750,000 depending on length and height of the wall.
Currently MnDOT is developing a program called the Greater MN Stand -Alone Noise Barrier
Program to address noise concerns in residential areas that were developed before 1997.
Unfortunately the River Mill Addition was platted in 1998 -2001 and therefore will not qualify
for this program.
95t' Street Extension — Gillard Avenue to Broadway
April 25, 2016
Page 4 of 6
Gillard Avenue at CR 39 Intersection Improvements
City staff met with Wright County to discuss options for safety improvements for the intersection
of Gillard Avenue and CR 39. The following short term and long term improvements were
discussed.
Short Term Improvements
• Dynamic Speed Signs: These electronic signs would provide an indication of the
speed a vehicle is traveling. It has been documented that these signs have been
effective in controlling speed. The estimated cost for two signs would be
approximately $10,000.
Rural Intersection Conflict Warning System (RICWS): This includes flashing
signs indicating vehicle presence at the intersection. The estimated cost would be
approximately $50,000.
Turn Lane Improvements: This would include converting the by -pass lane to a left
turn lane and providing additional separation for the right turn lane. The estimated
cost would be approximately $125,000.
Enforcement with Speed Trailer: In order to address the speeding concerns on CR
39 specifically at the speed transition from 45 mph to 55 mph, additional
enforcement should be provided including use of a speed trailer. Additional
enforcement on Gillard Avenue could address local speeding concerns as well.
Long Term Improvements
• Construction of a roundabout at the intersection. This improvement would
provide opportunity to make a pedestrian connection across CR 39 as well as slow
traffic down on CR 39. The roundabout could be viewed as a streetscape feature
marking the entrance to the City. The estimated cost of a roundabout is
approximately $750,000, not including any right of way costs.
With a roundabout and pedestrian connection across CR 39, a pathway connection
could be made along the Mississippi River to the Swan Park, Ellison Park and
ultimately to East Bridge Park, providing a regional connection to the City and
following the Mississippi River Trail (MRT) route.
County staff was in support of the short term improvements. County safety funds may be
available for sharing in some of the costs for the short term improvements. CR 39 is identified as
a future four lane roadway from Broadway to the east. County staff agreed that a roundabout
may be a viable long term option for the transition area from four lane back to two lane in the
future.
Conclusions and Recommendations
The traffic analysis and preliminary roadway options were reviewed by staff on March 1 and
April 19, 2016 and the Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) on March 3, 2016. The
conclusions from those meetings included:
95' Street Extension — Gillard Avenue to Broadway
April 25, 2016
Page 5 of 6
• While the traffic benefit of the proposed 95th Street extension is minimal with
today's traffic the connection may be of benefit in the future at full build out of
the area with an estimated 1500 vehicles per day.
• Both 95th Street roadway alignment alternatives, with the noise wall adjacent to I-
94 (Option 1) or adjacent to the residents (Option 2), provide a good connection
between Gillard Avenue and Broadway. Both alternatives include pedestrian
connection adjacent to the roadway from the neighborhoods and River Mill Park.
The primary difference is that with the noise wall adjacent to the residence
(Option 2) there are more property impacts.
• The 95th Street extension will provide benefit to Gillard Avenue with the
reduction of traffic. However, the safety issues at the Gillard Avenue and CR 39
intersection should be addressed with or without the extension of 95th Street.
Based on the review and conclusions the following is recommended:
1. Do not construct the 95th Street extension at this time, however with any adjacent
improvement (I -94 expansion or noise wall), insure that the alignment can be
implemented based on the preliminary options developed.
2. Consider extending 95th Street in the long term as a result of new development
that would increase traffic on Gillard Avenue to a critical level.
3. Work with Wright County on the implementation of Short Term improvements at
the intersection of Gillard Avenue and CR 39. Based on the following priority.
a. Turn lane Improvements
b. Dynamic Speed Signs
c. Rural Intersection Conflict Warning System
4. Work with Wright County on including the future roundabout at the Gillard
Avenue and CR 39 in the County's Capital Improvement Plan.
5. If the 95th Street extension is not considered at this time, work with MnDOT on a
location of the noise wall that would not preclude the roadway extension in the
future when deemed necessary.
6. If the 95th Street extension is not considered at this time, provide a pathway
connection from where it currently ends at River Mill Park to Broadway. This
could also include a path connection along Broadway Street to Meadow Oak
Road with a review of the traffic control at the intersections.
7. If the 95th Street extension is not considered at this time, provide a driveway
connection with a parking lot north of Broadway for traffic destined for either
River Mill Park or Freeway Fields Park.
95t' Street Extension — Gillard Avenue to Broadway
April 25, 2016
Page 6 of 6
8. Consider improving the pavement and roadway section on Gillard Avenue as part
of the City's Capital Improvement Plan.
9. Utilize a speed trailer to enforce speeds on Gillard Avenue and CR 39.
MILL RUN ROAD
Vii° �,t�T• f1��'
.S
OOa� K
__,i MEP00�
PROPOSED ROW
EX TRAIL
I � •_'1111,1y�
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS WITH WALL NEAR TH94
021
FF
r'
O
i
4"i! .
r 4
t
AMA
POTENTIAL RETAINING WALL
rn
MILL TRAIL LANE
-n
4, ! A !
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS WITH WALL NEAR TH94
a
s. ! "EX TRAIL
ky' 95TH ST�
E ' 1 �1
�.
A .i
"'
701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 CITY OF MONTICELLO
WSB Minnea�paolWls� MIN
bengscolm
95TH STREET NE EXTENSION - OPTION 1 WALL ADJACENT TO 194
& Associates, Inc.
763 - 5414800 -Fax 76 3-541 -1700
INFRASTRUCTURE I ENGINEERING I PLANNING (CONSTRUCTION WSB Project No.01627 -99
�I
T
PROPOSED ROW N -�
EX TRAIL C_S,
t,- TRAIL OPTION 2 MAX GRADE
,J► i F
�,.; _
-,"�.
� w . , � -, � •. , . � � \ •. ? o WITH WALL BEHIND TRAIL :. , w j �,aJ : �- � _ -
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS WI J _
TRAIL LANE
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS °� _ - ' .'"��•a„
WITH WALL BEHIND TRAIL N
1010 ±
W_
vw
I
701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300
WSB Minnewwapolis, MIN 55416
w.wsb sbeng.com g.com
& Associates, Inc.
■.■ 763 - 504800 -Fax 763 -541 -1700
INFRASTRUCTURE I ENGINEERING I PLANNING (CONSTRUCTION WS13 PfoleCt No.01627 -99
lop
D c yEX TRAIL±_ r ''.'. ,
lid 227
95TH STS
CITY OF MONTICELLO
95TH STREET NE EXTENSION - OPTION 2 WALL BEHIND TRAIL
a e"�
CITY OF
Monticetto
Date: Printed: 31112016
WSB Filename, K: \01627- 990 \Cad\Exhlblts \fig -01 Traffic Volumes.dgn
Leeend
XX Existing AM Peak Volumes
(XX) Existing PM Peak Volumes
8250 ADT
Z7 [11 600 AD (311 187 1
z5
�r %,\w (11,� "y
10 Q"!A .
'
k
It 11? -4 T, "I"k -a ja-� A�
[400 ADT] (1s) 30
..4 00 ADT" (1) o
' L
--�,� 1
'• e, L
o �
U- QJ
P >
s, v Q
LU
..
y OC
L
z
roll
f\ N
-T 40 ADT +'
.� .,x
[40 ADT] (0)
(0)
(0)
ApS
11D0
1311
D
.ol -D l
�q 0 roo�e�P ®�„
t
ti r, ice-
r W.,,,.��..v r
F— F-r°'
Ln 0
I
9"'m Street
NE
Q Q
N O
rLD-i N Ln
r
1 (6)
o (1) 350 ADT r s'
1 -0 t [1400 ADT] 95th Street NE
0 ) r
0 a o
O N O
F- o~
oQ
Qo d 1. 1 1. . om
CITY OF 95th Street Extension
Monticdo
City of Monticello, Minnesota
} N
0 Tt i tt
Traffic Volumes
MontJL%.-.%.,-.fl,o
Project Update
95th Street Extension
(Gillard Avenue to Broadway)
April 25, 2016
t
Monticello
Initial Project Concerns:
• Impacts to adjacent properties
• Safety of access to /from Gillard Avenue
at CR 39
• Cost of the 95thStreet extension
• Benefit of the 95thStreet extension
C, I_I.Y (.)F
A A4onticeffo
- i
rt OF
� Montiello
Current Traffic Analysis:
• Existing ADT on Gillard Avenue: 1,620 to 1,850 vehicles per day. Historic
counts conducted in 2001: 1050 to 1200 vehicles per day.
• 85% to 90% of the traffic entering or exiting CR 39 at Gillard Avenue has an
origin or destination in the City of Monticello (i.e. left turning from Gillard
Avenue to CR 39 or right turn from CR 39 to Gillard Avenue).
• Traffic on Gillard Avenue is not using River Forest Drive as a cut - through
avoiding the CR 39 intersection.
• Currently there is not a significant traffic generation impacting Gillard
Avenue from the area west on 95th Street or Haug Avenue.
• It is not likely that future long term development east of Haug Avenue will
utilize the 95th Street extension when traveling to and from Monticello with
CR 39 being the likely primary route.
C, I F Y (.)F
Ato A4iceno
Traffic
Volumes
.0.�j F Any M.W 51.
'M MTF
ip
2)
MOD AD T
ZHDFJrl T-
1, ON
C2
:,�-
V
at
a
z
Ah
d 1. z ita
40 A D r Ir 3$0 AI)T
140 ADD I )LMAD� 95th Street NE
4K
i Monticello
Future Traffic Projections:
Current Traffic on Gillard Ave: 1,620 to 1,850 ADT
With the 95th Street Extension:
• Gillard Avenue: 900 to 1,100 ADT
• 95th Street: 1,500 ADT
Without the 95th Street Extension:
• Gillard Avenue: 2,500 to 2,750 ADT
• •
i Monticello
Future Traffic Projections:
• Typical local City Street 1,200 ADT or less with a capacity
of up to 5,000 ADT.
• Existing 1,850 on Gillard is approaching a critical level.
With rehabilitation, critical level could be improved to
2,000 to 2,500 ADT.
• Comparable City Streets:
• Broadway, east of CR 18/39 = 2,050 vpd
• Fenning Avenue, south of School Blvd =1,800 vpd
• Fallon Avenue, south of Chelsea Rd =1,750 vpd
• Cedar Street, north of 7th Ave =1,450 vpd
• Innsbrook Drive, south of Chelsea Rd =1,850 vpd (estimate)
• •
t
Monticello
Project Considerations - 95th Street:
• Future Traffic Impact
• Proposed 28 foot Street Section to limit impacts
• Existing is 36 -feet wide
• Potential Noise Wall Location
• Right of Way /Easement Impacts
• Estimated Cost - $1.1 million
y A4onticeno
Preliminary Roadway Alignments - Option 1
'41 -v,
b,"i WWI
r ti 4�
r SCI, L [I
74M 1
"'IAe"414r ■!LL
�n Y�
,. C[T4s "�JLT[414 1.,4111x. PITII PALL Yi ATI t•!Ji ''„ f'
AhF
P
YSQY/ TRUC.1711#4 L I Y 1 T ill l IIAI 1 41 +h I Ilyl
A�E
4
ST
sip
�.
+may I
411 h,.}: ",I EgP�I.
CITY OF MONTICECE
95TH STREET NE EXTENSION - OPTION 1 WALL ADJACENT TO 194
C I T Y OF
Monticello
Preliminary Roadway Alignments - Option 2
crry bF M ONTICELLO
145TH MEET 4S EXTENSION - OPMON 2 WALL 6EHIND VWL
i Monticello
CR 39 /Gillard Ave Intersection
• Safety improvements
to CR39 /Gillard
Ave
intersection
should be considered
with or without
95th
Street
• Short Term Solution
• Enforcement with Speed Trailer
• Dynamic Speed Signs
• Flashing signs indicating vehicle presence ($50,000)
• Rural Intersection Conflict Warning System
• Separated EB CR 39 right turn lane at Gillard Ave
and WB CR 39 left turn lane at Gillard Ave($125,000)
• Long Term Solution
• Roundabout at Gillard and CR 39
M
t
Monticello
Pathway /Park Connections:
• Battle Rapids Park
• Future regional pathway along Mississippi River
• Connection to Broadway St, Freeway Fields and
Meadow Oak Road /Dog Park
• Broadway St driveway connection and parking
lot for River Mill or Freeway Fields Park
C, I_I.Y (.)F
A A4onticeffo
- i
i Monticello
Conclusions:
• Future traffic volume benefit of 95th St Extension at full
buildout is estimated at 1,500 vpd.
• The 95th Street extension will provide benefit to
Gillard Avenue with the reduction of traffic. However,
the safety issues at the Gillard Avenue and CR 39
intersection should be addressed with or without
the extension of 95th Street.
• Noise wall can be implemented with or without
95th Street Extension.
•
i Monticello
Recommendations:
• Provide for the 95th St extension when area to east develops in the future
or Gillard Ave approaches a critical traffic volume and account for future
noise wall.
• Work with Wright County on improvement options for the Gillard Avenue
at CR 39 intersection
• Provide a pathway connection from where it currently ends at River Mill
Park to Broadway and driveway /parking access to River Mill Park and
Freeway Fields Park
• Consider improving the pavement and roadway section on Gillard
Avenue as part of the City's Capital Improvement Plan.
• Utilize a speed trailer to enforce speeds on Gillard Avenue and CR 39.
Summary - Flashing Yellow Arrows
(1) Both MnDOT and Wright County cost share policy's splits cost by who has jurisdiction on each leg of the intersection. The estimated cost shown is a best case scenario for funding.
If MnDOT and /or the County choose not to participate the City would be responsible for those additional costs.
(2) Total costs includes construction and 8% indirect costs. The largest item costs are $30,000 for a new cabinet and $7,000 for a new controller
City Street Light Fund
2016*
Estimated Cost Share (1)
3yr Crash
History
$680,000
$690,000
$650,000
Annual Franchise Fee Revenue
$300,000
$300,000
$300,000
FYA
($215,000)
($215,000)
($215,000)
Street Lighting Project in CIP
($75,000)
($125,000)
($75,000)
MnDOT
County
City
Total Crashes
Correctable
2012 ADT
1 $650,0001
$660,000
Intersection
Total Cost (2)
Crashes
Priority Year
Map ID #
TH 25 @ School Blvd
------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - --
$37,000
------------- - - - - --
$18,500
-------- - - - - --
-------- - - - - --
$18,500
--------- - - - - --
13
----------- - - - - --
6
----------- - - - - --
25,500
------------ - - - - --
1
------------ - - - - --
1
-------- - - - - --
TH 25 @ Chelsea Rd
------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - --
$89,500
------------- - - - - --
$44,750
-------- - - - - --
-------- - - - - --
$44,750
--------- - - - - --
19
----------- - - - - --
6
----------- - - - - --
25,500
------------ - - - - --
1
------------ - - - - --
2
-------- -------
TH 25 @ I -94 EB Ramp / Oakwood Dr
------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - --
$58,300
------------- - - - - --
$43,725
-------- - - - - --
-------- - - - - --
$14,575
--------- - - - - --
15
----------- - - - - --
3
----------- - - - - --
25,500
------------ - - - - --
1
------------ - - - - --
3
-------- - - - - --
TH 25 @ 1 -94 WB ramp
------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - --
$66,000
------------- - - - - --
$66,000
-------- - - - - --
-------- - - - - --
--------- - - - - --
9
----------- - - - - --
2
----------- - - - - --
26,000
------------ - - - - --
1
------------ - - - - --
4
-------- - - - - --
TH 25 @ River St
$72,600
$36,300
$36,300
16
2
26,000
1
5
Total TH 25 Signals - Year 1
$323,400
$209,275
$0
$114,125
72
19
------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - --
CSAH 18-@-1--94- / Chelsea Rd
-----------------EB --Ramp ------------------------------------- - - - - --
------------- - - - - --
$71,500
------------- - - - - --
-------- - - - - --
$17,875
-------- - - - - --
-------- - - - - --
$35,750
-------- - - - - --
--------- - - - - --
$17,875
--------- - - - - --
----------- - - - - --
7
---------------------------
----------- - - - - --
1
-- - - - - --
------------ - - - - --
11,200
------------ - - - - --
------------------
2
------------ - - - - --
-------- - - - - --
6
-------- - - - - --
CSAH 18 @ 1 -94 WB Ramp / 7th St
--------------------------------
$71,500
$17,875
-------- - - - - --
$35,750
--------- - - - - --
$17,875
--------- - - - - --
11
------------------------------------
6
11,200
------------ - - - - --
2
-----------------------------------
7
CSAH 18 @ CSAH 39 /CSAH 75 (Broadway)
$71,500
1
1 $53,625
$17,875
7
3
11,200
2
8
Total CSAH 18 Signals - Year 2
$214,500
$35,750
$125,125
$53,625
25
10
------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - --
CSAH 75 @ CSAH 39 / Elm St
------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - --
------------- - - - - --
$56,000
------------- - ------------------------
-------- - - - - --
--------- - - - - --
$42,000
------ - - - - --
--------- - - - - --
$14,000
--------- - - - - --
------------------------------------
4
------------------------------------
1
------------ - - - - --
7,200
------------ - - - - --
------------ - - - - --
3
------------ - - - - --
---------------
9
-------- - - - - --
CSAH 75 @ Hospital / School Entrance
------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - --
$65,500
------------- - ------------------------
$32,750
------ - - - - --
$32,750
--------- - - - - --
0
----------- - - - - --
0
----------- - - - - --
9,300
------------ - - - - --
3
------------ - - - - --
10
-------- - - - - --
CSAH 75 @ Highland Way
$56,000
1
1 $28,000
1 $28,000
2
1
9,300
3
11
Total CSAH 75 Signals - Year 3
$177,500
$0
$102,750
$74,750
6
2
Total
$715,400
$245,025
$227,875
$242,500
103
31
(1) Both MnDOT and Wright County cost share policy's splits cost by who has jurisdiction on each leg of the intersection. The estimated cost shown is a best case scenario for funding.
If MnDOT and /or the County choose not to participate the City would be responsible for those additional costs.
(2) Total costs includes construction and 8% indirect costs. The largest item costs are $30,000 for a new cabinet and $7,000 for a new controller
City Street Light Fund
* As of 12/31/15, the Street Light Fund Balance was $680,000
** The remaining balance could be utilized for flashing yellow arrows and /or future lighting needs at the Bertram Athletic Complex
2016*
2017
2018
Street Light Fund Balance
$680,000
$690,000
$650,000
Annual Franchise Fee Revenue
$300,000
$300,000
$300,000
St Light Mtce and Electric Fee Expenses
($215,000)
($215,000)
($215,000)
Street Lighting Project in CIP
($75,000)
($125,000)
($75,000)
Remaining Street Light End of Year Fund Balance **
1 $690,000
1 $650,0001
$660,000
* As of 12/31/15, the Street Light Fund Balance was $680,000
** The remaining balance could be utilized for flashing yellow arrows and /or future lighting needs at the Bertram Athletic Complex
v•
•
s -
Or
4 .
6-'
I
C' i •_
lk
IL
7R
41
1 b
L MP �7 •
JOB
A
�: i