Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
EDA Agenda 07-13-2016
AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA) Wednesday, July 13th, 2016 — 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners: President Bill Demeules, Vice President Bill Tapper, Treasurer Steve Johnson, Tracy Hinz, James Davidson, and Council members Tom Perrault and Lloyd Hilgart Staff: Jeff O'Neill, Angela Schumann, EDA Executive Director Jim Thares, Wayne Oberg Guest: Ryan Spencer and Brett Weiss, WSB & Associates 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approve Meeting Minutes: a. Special Meeting — April 13th, 2016 (To Be Provided at Meeting) b. Special Meeting — April 18th, 2016 (To Be Provided at Meeting) c. Workshop Meeting — June 2, 2016 d. Regular Meeting - June 8, 2016 4. Consideration of additional agenda items 5. Consideration of approving payment of bills 6. Consideration of Acceptance of Phase II Env. Report for Block 34, Ryan Spencer, WSB 7. Consideration of Update of Storm Water Management System Proposal for Otter Creek Business Park, Brett Weiss, WSB 8. Consideration to direct preparation of an Amendment to the Contract for Private Development between Masters 5th Avenue and the Monticello EDA and modification of Tan Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District 1-35 9. Consideration of discussion regarding protective covenants for Outlots E and F, Otter Creek Crossing as related to outdoor storage 10. Consideration of discussion regarding Small Area Study in Downtown 11. Consideration of 2017 EDA Budget 12. Consideration of Director's Report 13. Consideration of recessing to closed session to develop or consider offers or counteroffers for the purchase or sale of real of personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statute 13D.05, Subdivision 3(c)(3) 14. Adjourn closed session 15. Adjourn Meeting Minutes WORKSHOP- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA) Thursday, June 2nd, 2016 (4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.) Academy Room, Monticello Community Center Attendance EDA: Bill Demeules, Bill Tapper, Steve Johnson, Tracy Hinz, & James Davidson Council members: Tom Perrault & Charlotte Galder. Staff: Angela Schumann, Jim Thares Facilitator: Phil Barnes (WSB & Associates) Meeting Minutes • Angela Schumann kicked off the meeting by thanking all those in attendance & describing the agenda for the meeting. The goal is to create more focus for EDA & City efforts related to Economic Development. • Phil Barnes (WSB & Associates) suggested that the goal for today is to begin finding key & focused actions. Phil then described the workshop process & developed ground rules with participants that are conducive to effective partnerships. • Phil then discussed the structure for the discussion. This included the development of a brand statement & discussion on Industrial Development, Downtown & Housing barriers. Major barriers would then help create focus for development of actions for the EDA & City. • Phil then facilitated a short branding exercise & discussion that resulted in the following brand Monticello is an energetic community engaged as a leader in technology, creating a positive environment and pathways for innovative commerce and business. Industrial Development • BARRIERS TO THE MONTICELLO BRAND: Participants agreed that a barrier to industrial development is the reputation of Monticello. This includes the developer's perspective of Monticello's decision making process. Developers can potentially see Monticello as difficult to work with. Monticello may have challenges aligning EDA and Council messaging to developers. Discussions also focused on the lack of strategy on the business type and size Monticello is pursuing. It was suggested that Monticello may undervalue or underestimate its assets and potential and therein focus too much on attracting smaller businesses and compromising standards. The participants agreed that Monticello may have opportunities with larger publicly held businesses. AGREED UPON AREA OF ACTION & FOCUS #1: Participants envisioned that Monticello should focus on creating a communication structure and a shortened application for business development guiding developers in their investment decision. The guidance will focus messaging around what Monticello can do for them; to help facilitate their development proposals. Guidance will also attempt to align EDA and Council messaging to developers. AGREED UPON AREA OF ACTION & FOCUS #2: Participants would like to see the development of a marketing package and plan that shares the story of Monticello in a positive light. This marketing effort will focus on attracting high technology and precision manufacturing firms. The package and plan will be re -focused on an agreed upon brand statement. This package and plan will feature the investment in gigabyte fiber technology, reduced occupancy costs, access to energy and transportation network, productive tax rate, development success stories and other components that will showcase Monticello. AGREED UPON AREA OF ACTION & FOCUS #3: Revaluate standards to ensure flexibility is available to facilitate cutting edge business development. Consolidate a communication package that discusses and features the positives and benefits of standards and a pathway of being flexible with developers. Downtown Development • BARRIERS TO THE MONTICELLO BRAND: Given changes and recent investments in downtown, participants agreed that there is no longer a valid vision for downtown and they will struggle to move forward without a vision. Other discussions included traffic, unrealistic redevelopment and feelings that Monticello "takes what it can get". Monticello previously envisioned an "anchor" retailer and it appears that downtown may now lack the space. AGREED UPON AREA OF ACTION & FOCUS #4: Develop a scaled down and focused vision for areas where there is real potential and momentum for development. The visioning process should not be extensive and instead be focused on areas west of TH 25 and near the "four corners". The visioning process should create a dialogue with interested and potentially impacted major stakeholders like Cargill. The visioning process should proceed with caution and be budget minded. The process should include researching Walgreens' location decision and the possibility of a senior housing anchor for the development of convenience retail. Housing BARRIERS TO THE MONTICELLO BRAND: Participants agreed that there is no focus or experience working on the housing program(s). There is limited interaction with the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency or County programs. There is no aggressive policy on affordable housing and there remain questions regarding how the term "affordable" is defined. • AGREED UPON AREA OF ACTION & FOCUS #5: Participants see an opportunity to learn through working through one major project and completing a research scan of other housing programs. The Merrill Busch Rand Mansion was discussed as the potential project that could be redeveloped into senior housing with preservation of cultural and historic features. After identifying housing program best practices, staff will work on a process to ensure the residents and developers interested in rehabilitation of blighted housing are offered housing program incentives automatically. • SUMMARY NOTE: A consensus derived among the EDA members regarding the priority of the work objectives is as follows: The top priority is to focus on downtown redevelopment of blocks 52, 34 and other core central business district parcels. With that in mind, the EDA should consider a completing a small area study in the near future to guide the redevelopment of a core area of the downtown. The second and third priorities are to focus respectively on industrial development activities and housing programs/projects and/or tools offering residential rehab opportunities as blight mitigation and facilitating processes that help in meeting the needs of the affordable and senior demographic segments of the community. Meeting Adjourned at 7:00 pm MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA) Wednesday, June 8, 2016, Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Bill Demeules, Bill Tapper, Tracy Hinz, Steve Johnson, Tom Perrault, Lloyd Hilgart Absent: Jim Davidson Others: Angela Schumann, Jim Thares 1. Call to Order Bill Demeules called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes March 9, 2016 Special Meeting March 9, 2016 Regular Meeting April 13, 2016 Regular Meeting May 11, 2016 Regular Meeting TAPPER MOVED TO APPROVE THE MARCH 9, 2016 SPECIAL EDA MEETING MINUTES. JOHNSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 6-0. PERRAULT MOVED TO APPROVE THE MARCH 9, 2016 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES WITH CORRECTIONS NOTED. TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 6-0. PERRAULT MOVED TO TABLE THE APRIL 13, 2016 SPECIAL EDA MEETING MINUTES. HINZ SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 6-0. TAPPER MOVED TO APPROVE THE APRIL 13, 2016 REGULAR EDA MEETING MINUTES WITH CORRECTIONS NOTED BY PERRAULT. HINZ SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 6-0. PERRAULT MOVED TO TABLE THE APRIL 18, 2016 SPECIAL EDA MEETING MINUTES. TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 6-0. TAPPER MOVED TO APPROVE THE MAY 11, 2016 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES WITH CORRECTIONS NOTED BY PERRAULT. JOHNSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 6-0. 4. Consideration of adding items to the agenda Jim Thares, Economic Development Manager, noted the addition of Consideration of the First Amendment to the Purchase and Development Agreement between the EDA and EDA Minutes: 6/8/16 Clear Creek Land Company (Dahlheimer). He asked that this item be placed on the agenda after Item 8. 5. Consideration of approving payment of bills TAPPER MOVED TO APPROVE PAYMENT OF BILLS THROUGH MAY 31, 2016. HINZ SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 6-0. 6. Consideration of Amendment to By Laws of the EDA Jim Thares explained the intent of the Economic Development Manager position, per the job description, is to serve as the Executive Director of the EDA. The Bylaws are inconsistent with the EDA Enabling Resolution which allows the City Administrator to appoint a staff member to serve as the Executive Director. Amending the Bylaws to read similarly to the Enabling resolution would allow such appointment to occur. Commissioner Perrault noted a language issue in the Enabling resolution that he has previously mentioned. It is confusing as it refers to HRA in Section 6. It should be noted that the City does not have an HRA (Housing and Redevelopment Authority). Angela Schumann explained that she did previously review this language with the EDA legal counsel and was informed that the wording including the HRA needs to remain in the resolution because the EDA incorporated the statutory powers of the HRA when it was formed. , TAPPER MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION EDA 2016-004 AMENDING THE BYLAWS. PERRAULT SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 6-0. 7. Consideration of Appointment of EDA Executive Director Angela Schumann reported that consistent with the approval of the Bylaws amendment under Item 6, the City Administrator would like to appoint Economic Development Manager Jim Thares as the EDA Executive Director. HINZ MOVED TO APPROVE THE APPOINTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER JIM THARES AS THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE EDA PENDING A WRITTEN SIGNED DOCUMENT FROM THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR MAKING SAID APPOINTMENT. TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 6-0. 8. Consideration of Discussing protective covenants for Outlots E and F, Otter Creek Crossing as related to outdoor Storage Jim Thares reviewed the report for the discussion of the covenants as related to outdoor storage. He referred to a compilation of possible standards that were developed in house as well as a list received from another city in the region. The key standards include: the EDA Minutes: 6/8/16 amount of land devoted to outdoor storage relative to the principal building or the overall lot size, the nature of the screening elements/materials and the placement of the outdoor storage area on a particular lot. It is best if it located in back of the principal building. He further reviewed the genesis of the request to review a possible amendment to the covenants as interest in the business park by a local, growing firm that needs a small amount of outdoor storage to conduct its operations. Commissioners discussed the process of amending the covenants and also the benefit of reviewing the draft standards with the interested prospect. HINZ MOVED TO AUTHORIZE FURTHER NEXT STEPS RESEARCH INTO AMENDING THE COVENANTS PENDING DISCUSSION WITH THE INTERESTED PROSPECT. TAPPER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 6-0. 9. Consideration of Approving a First Amendment to the Purchase and Development Contract between the City of Monticell EDA and Clear Creek Land Company, LLC Jim Thares reviewed the request from the Clear Creek Land Company due to complications with the format of the plat. The original closing date of June 30, may be too soon to allow the plat issues to be resolved. It should be noted that there is a possibility that all issues can be worked through by the end of June and the proposed extension of time until August 31, 2016 may not be needed. The preliminary plat and other land development applications were approved at the Planning Commison meeting on June 7, 2016. Those recommendations will now be forwarded to the City Council on June 27, 2016. There are also some drainage issues that need to be worked out. It does seem that there is a desire to get the project underway by the owners as soon as possible. TAPPER MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION EDA 2016-005 AMENDING THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY EDA AND CLEAR CREEK LAND COMPANY, LLC EXTENDING THE CLOSING DATE UNTIL AUGUST 31, 2016. JOHNSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 6-0. 10. Director's Report Jim Thares reviewed the Director's report noting the departure of Kerry Burri and a pending new hire. He also reviewed a recent meeting with the Monticello workforce center to better understand labor supportive programs and possible collaborative efforts. A meeting with Xcel Energy was noted. They are proposing to establish a certified available site program that would be marketed via their website on a national basis. They are looking for parcels of 25 acres or more of available land in the Monticello area that can be included in the certification process. They have excess load capacity in the community and can support larger energy users locating in the City. This would be a cooperative research effort and some of the costs may be shared among any EDA Minutes: 6/8/16 benefitting land owners, Xcel Energy and the EDA if that is something that is of interest going forward. Finally, Jim noted the regional CEDS (Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy) effort and a resolution of support that is being drafted for City Council consideration encouraging Wright County to commit to participate in the effort and share in the costs with Benton, Sherburne and Stearns Counties as well as the Central Minnesota Jobs & Training Center and the Initiative Foundation. President Demeules stated that the EDA would next go into a closed session to discuss real estate offers and counteroffers for Fred's Auto Building property located at 349 West Broadway Street. The parcel number is 155010050011. HINZ MOVED TO RECESS THE OPEN MEETING TO GO INTO A CLOSED SESSION REGARDING REAL ESTATE OFFERS AND COUNTEROFFERS. PERRAULT SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 6-0. 11. Adiournment JOHNSON MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 7:18 PM. PERRAULT SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 6-0. Recorder: Beth Green Approved: Attest: Jim Thares, EDA Ma 4 EDA Agenda: 7/13/16 5. Consideration of approving payment of bills (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Accounts Payable summary statements listing bills submitted during the previous month are included for review. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve payment of bills through June 2016. 2. Motion to approve payment of bills through June 2016 with changes as directed by the EDA. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative 91. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Accounts Payable Summary Statements L in in in in O G1 O O •T G� O� O O O O 4- N O O N lV O N O o O O N N M N O N NIc O N � O O O O N M O c K M M M 1-0 M M Im in in in in O O O G1 O O •T G� O� O O O O O O N O N O o O O N N N O N NIc O N � O O O O N M M M M M 1-0 M M Im I Q Q Q Q Q 41.1 -73 Q x x x = zz x Z Z O O O G1 O O •T G� O� O O O O O O o O O O O N M M M M M M M M N N N N N N N 11 0 z 0 a M_ N x m a Page: 1 Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 200 South Sixth Street, Suite 470 Minneapoiis, MN 55402 Monticello EDA April 30, 2016 MN325-00030 Dahbaimer Property Conveyance Through April 30, 2016 For All Legal Services As Follows: �l3 1+ 3 01.450400 Hours Amount 41714U16 MNI Review proposed terms of conveyance of EDA property Dahitieirmer, to 1 00 190.00 4/712016 MNI Phone and email correspondence with A Schumann, W Oberg regarding schedule of events, 0.50 95.00 procedure for Dahlheimer property conveyance, review proposed schedule. 4/11/2016 MNI Review LOI, draft PA Agreement; Office conference with Rocklitz regarding same. C 2.50 475.00 4111/2016 CBR Review ernails and letter of intent 0.25 31,75 4/12/2016 MNl Draft Purchase and Development Contract, 3.40 646.00 4/12/2016 CBR Draft quit claim deed; review Wright County well Site for 0,75 Property information 95.25 4/1312016 MNI Draft Purchase and Development Agreemeol- entail cc rrespor de n ce with A Schumann regarding terms of 3 S0 722.40 ccnveYance; draft notice of public hearing, planning commission resolution, city resolution approving sale to EDA. 4/13/201j3 CBR, Revise deed From City to ED& review Purchase and Redevelopment Agreement 0.75 95,25 and revise 4/1412016 MNI Ernail cOrrespcndence regarding title work and need for new Comrr�itment, other PA matters with A Schumann, 0.30 57 00 4/14/2016 MNI Finalize first draft of Purchase and Development Agreement; circulate. 1.30 247.00 4/18/2016 CBR Draft list of closing documents; review contract and ernails 0.50 $3.50 4119/2016 MNI Finalize notice, City resolution; email correspondence with A Schurnann regarding Contract questions; office 0,70 133,0/3 conference with C Rocklitz regarding same, Page: 2 Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 200 South Sixth Street. Suite 470 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Monticello EDA April 30, 206 For All Disbursements As Follows: 6.00 4118/2016 American office Products - Tabs Total Disbursements: $ 6.D0 Total Services and Disbursements: $ 3,635.75 MNI lilfinalize claim yce eng 090 171.00 411912016 reappapproving conveyance of pubi hearing, and City so 412a12D1rj uestians coriference ah A Schumann s discussed. I��k on 0-60 114•00 P&D Agreement; ihone ncorporate ate revisions 4125/20116 MNi spondence A Schumann regarding 0.50 95.Ofl esttrrictivercovvenanM preliminary review of same,th MNI Draft commission resolution for conveyance of 0.50 95.00 412712016 A land EDA 412912016 MINI Review plats and covenants for atter Creek Crnssing; 1.411 190.00 review questions from A Schumann regarding same MNI andquestions from A Schumann: email 0.60 114.00 412912016 garding memo reovenantsa Total Services: $ 3,629.75 For All Disbursements As Follows: 6.00 4118/2016 American office Products - Tabs Total Disbursements: $ 6.D0 Total Services and Disbursements: $ 3,635.75 Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 200 South Sixth Street, S Ulte 470 Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612)637-9300 41-1226894 May 24, 2016 Statement No. 131541 Monticello EDA 505 Walnut Ave, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Through April 30, 2018 MN325-00030 Dahlheimer Property Conveyance 1 declare, under penalty of law, that this aocount, claim or demand is just and corrQct and that no part of it has been paid, 0nature of blain ,nt 3,635.75 Total Current Billing: 3,635.7.5 Page 2. - Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 200 South Sixth Street, Suite 470 Minneapolis, MN 56402 City of Monticello April 3U, 2016 AAN190-00101 General EDA Matters o� Through April 30, 2016 For All Legal Services As Follows; Hours Amount 4}1/2016 GAF Phone call with City regarding assignment of TIF contract 0.30 -00 41512016 MNI Phone oorrversation with A Schumann regarding TlF 35 0.6a 114.00 and possible assignment of contract, change in project, steps needed - 415120l5 MNI Review Master's Fifth contract and email to A Schumann, 0.30 57.00 l r 417/2016 Mhll Review Mast&s Fifth Contract and request for consent to 1,60 asMgnmen'.; ernaii correspondence with A Schumann regarding same; draft approving resolution; revise consent language acrd circulate. V712016 IVINl Review staff report and approval resolution for Master's 0-60 1�4-OQ Fifth assignment; Phone conversation with A Schumann regarding same. 411312016 Mull Meeting preparation and email correspondence with A 0-20 30,00 Schumann for ECA meeting on TIF 35. - l 411312016 MNI Travel and EDA meeting regarding TIF 35 change in 1,60 304,00 projeGt and possible assignment, 4114/2016 MNJ Review management agreemeni for wastewater facility. 0,50 95-00 � t� 411 M016 MNI Monthly fina-ice phone ca;l with City staff, Northland. 1 50 285-p0 F Total Services: $ 1,365.00 -3040 Fr1 7 5 MAY �}(�{[ Total Services and Dlsbursernenta, 5 I LU 141 1,ass-00 Lam . Li CI q&�X LL�t CI 1 q��rCV Northland Securities, Inc. 45 South 7th Street Suite 2000 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1625 USA Voice: 612-851-5900 Fax: 612 -851- 5951 Sold To: City of Monticello Angela Schumann 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 Invoice NORTHLAND SECURITIES Invoice Number: 6 4462 Invoice Date: 5/10/16 Customer PO Payment Terms Sales Rep ID Due Date Expansion Proj. Net 30 nays 6/9/16 Description Amount For sexvices related to Manufacturing Expansion Project, Please see enclosed detail. 765.00 Subtotal 765,00 Sales Tax Total Invoice Amount 765.00 Check No: Payment Received TOTAL Northland Securities, Inc. 45 South 7th Street, Suite 2000, Minneapolis, MN 55402 Toll tree 1-800-851-2920 m.i. 612-851-5900 pax 612-851-5987 www. northlandsecurities.com Member FINRA and SIPC NORTHLAND STRATEGIES Special Projects Group. INVOICE SUPPLEMENT Client: City of Monticello Project: Manufacturing expansion project Contact: Angela Schumann City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Billing Period: April 2016 Services Performed • Update T1F estimates • Review and provide recommendation for letter to company • Follow-up discussion and recommendations to city staff Staff Time Position Hours Rate Billable Senior Professional 4.50 $170 $765.00 Professional - $135 $0.00 Support - $105 $0.00 Total Staff 4.50 $765.00 Expenses Mileage $0.00 Printing $0.00 Other $0.00 Total Expenses $0.00 Total This Period .$7.65.00 ; Project Summary Total Budget* Billed This Period Billed Previous Budget Remaining *Billed hourly. ($765.00) ($1,360.00) $ (2,125.00) Northland Securities, Inc. Page 2 of 2 Northland Securities, Inc, 45 South 7th Street Suite 2000 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1625 USA Voice; 612-851-5900 Fax: 612-851-5951 Sold To: City of Monticello Angela Schumann 505 walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 Invoice NORTH LAND16 SECURITIES Invoice Number: 4471 Invoice Date: 5/10/16 Page: 1 bV 3, k�P�e�°f1 Customer PO Payment Terms Sales Rep ID Due Date TIF Mgmt Plan Update Net 30 Days 6/9/16 .__ Description Amount For services related to TIF Management Flan Update. ?lease see enclosed detail. 850.00 Subtotal 850.00 Sales Tax Tota( Invoice Amount 850.00 Check No: Payment Received TOTAL Northland Securities, Inc. 45 South 7th Street, Suite 2000, Minneapolis, MN 55402 Tau iw, 1-800-851-2920 Main 612-851-5900 tldx 612-851-5987 www.northlandsecurities,corn Member FINRA and SIPC NORTHLAND STRATEGIES Spacial Projects Group: INVOICE SUPPLEMENT Client: City of Monticello Project: TIF Management Plan Update Contact: Angela Schumann City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Billing Period: April 2036 Services Performed • Update TIF 1-22 Pro Forma and financial management plan • Collect parcel data for all TIF districts from County • Collect data from city staff for all TIF districts Staff Time Position Hours Rate Billable Senior Professional 5.00 $170 $850.00 Professional - $135 $0.00 Support - $105 $0.00 Total Staff 5.00 $850.00 Expenses Mileage Printing Other Total Expenses Total This Period Project Summary Total Budget* Billed This Period Billed Previous Budget Remaining $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8$0.00 $ 7,000.00 ($850.00) $0.00 $ 6,150.00 Northland Securities, Inc. Page 2 of 2 CHECK REQUEST CHECK AMOUNT: oe? 4o- REQUEST DATE: 6 69r:j C Check to: Harry T. Lantto 907 — 2"' Ave S Buffalo, MN 55313 Meeting Worked: Planning Commission EDA Meeting City Council City Council Total Due: ? q Q Date 5b b Date v Date Date�� , Vendor 9 Time J Amount Due 0., c�c Time Amount Due Time - Amount Due Time�a Amount Due Planning Commission:. q (q EDA City Council Authorized by: 1 - � . q 301. q3 W)(,) Date [ TIME SHEETS ATTACHED MONTICELLO COMMUNITY CENTER TIME STILET Employee Name HARRY LANTTO Position PUBLIC MEETING RECORDER - CONTRACT Meetin Pa nlent $60 for first 3 hours Agreei�lei�t: $10 .per hour for every hour after MEETING RECORDER: Harry T. Laritto SIGNATURE: DATE:! Z AUTHORIZED B DATE: Page 2. - Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 200 South Sixth Street, Suite 470 Minneapolis, MN 56402 City of Monticello April 3U, 2016 AAN190-00101 General EDA Matters o� Through April 30, 2016 For All Legal Services As Follows; Hours Amount 4}1/2016 GAF Phone call with City regarding assignment of TIF contract 0.30 -00 41512016 MNI Phone oorrversation with A Schumann regarding TlF 35 0.6a 114.00 and possible assignment of contract, change in project, steps needed - 415120l5 MNI Review Master's Fifth contract and email to A Schumann, 0.30 57.00 l r 417/2016 Mhll Review Mast&s Fifth Contract and request for consent to 1,60 asMgnmen'.; ernaii correspondence with A Schumann regarding same; draft approving resolution; revise consent language acrd circulate. V712016 IVINl Review staff report and approval resolution for Master's 0-60 1�4-OQ Fifth assignment; Phone conversation with A Schumann regarding same. 411312016 Mull Meeting preparation and email correspondence with A 0-20 30,00 Schumann for ECA meeting on TIF 35. - l 411312016 MNI Travel and EDA meeting regarding TIF 35 change in 1,60 304,00 projeGt and possible assignment, 4114/2016 MNJ Review management agreemeni for wastewater facility. 0,50 95-00 � t� 411 M016 MNI Monthly fina-ice phone ca;l with City staff, Northland. 1 50 285-p0 F Total Services: $ 1,365.00 -3040 Fr1 7 5 MAY �}(�{[ Total Services and Dlsbursernenta, 5 I LU 141 1,ass-00 Lam . Li CI q&�X LL�t CI 1 q��rCV O o o 0 0 b m `T 41 O N O O o O O O N O N O1 O 71 M O M eY � O O N N M N y 0 a N O 7 t�rri i.. h-1 • Q U o � O O o o 0 0 b m `T 41 O N O O o O O O N O N O1 O 71 M O M eY � O O N N M N y a 7 N O In O JD a N N � N � � O Q Q Q � J Cfl a � (h O D F a. < government • energy , commercial 701 Xenia Avenue South City of Monticello May 26, 2016 Suite 300Minneapolis, MN 55416 Attn: Wayne Oberg, Finance Director Project No: 02596-010 Tel: (763) 541.4800 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Invoice No: 16 Fax: (763) 541-1700 Monticello, MN 55362-8831 General Engineering Services City Staff Reviewer - Jeff Professional Services from April 01, 2016 to April 30. 2016_ Phase 03 2016 General Engineering Services GL Acct #101.43111.430300, 601.49440.430300 & 602.49490.430300 Fee Total Fee 93,000.00 Percent Complete 33.3333 Total Earned Previous Fee Billing Current Fee Billing Total Fee Billings to Date 31,000.00 23,250.00 7,750.00 7,750.00 Total this Phase $7,750.00 Meetings Spencer, Ryan 4/13/2016 EDA Meeting - Env Update Spencer, Ryan 4/15/2016 EDA Docs - Phase I ESA Spencer, Ryan 4/18/2016 EDA Meeting - Block 34 Spencer, Ryan 4119/2016 EDA Meeting - Follow Up Totals Total Labor Billings to Date Current Labor 980.00 Totals 980.00 Comments: 4.00 98.00 392.00 1.00 98.00 98.00 4.00 98.00 392.00 t3 1.00 98.00 98.00 10.00 980.00 980.00 Total this Phase $980.00 Prior Total 1,690.00 2,670.00 4,690.00 2,670.00 Total this Invoice $8,730.00 Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.cum Current Prior Total Fee 7,750.00 23,250.00 31,000.00 Totals 7,750.00 23,250.00 31,000.00 Phase 04 2016 Hourly """-----^'-___,...___ GL Acct #101:43111-430300,v L41-0-10 1 .4WD Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Meetings Spencer, Ryan 4/13/2016 EDA Meeting - Env Update Spencer, Ryan 4/15/2016 EDA Docs - Phase I ESA Spencer, Ryan 4/18/2016 EDA Meeting - Block 34 Spencer, Ryan 4119/2016 EDA Meeting - Follow Up Totals Total Labor Billings to Date Current Labor 980.00 Totals 980.00 Comments: 4.00 98.00 392.00 1.00 98.00 98.00 4.00 98.00 392.00 t3 1.00 98.00 98.00 10.00 980.00 980.00 Total this Phase $980.00 Prior Total 1,690.00 2,670.00 4,690.00 2,670.00 Total this Invoice $8,730.00 Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.cum Project 02596-010 MONT - General Engineering Services Invoice 16 Approved by: Reviewed by: Bret Weiss Project Manager: Shibani Bisson Page 2 Julie Cheney From: Wayne Oberg Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 10:25 AM To: WSBshibani Cc: Jeff O'Neill; Angela Schumann; Julie Cheney Subject: EDA SB: Please change the future coding on the EDA related expenditures for Ryan Spencer, currently coded to 101-43111- 430300, to the EDA General Fund engineering expense code. Julie will make the changes on the current invoice. Thank you! Wayne Wayne W. Oberg, MBA, CPA Finance Director Tel: 763-271-3211 Fax: 763-295-4404 NOTE: The content's of this E-mail may contain information that is legally privileged and/or confidential to the named recipient. This information is not to be used by any other person and/or organization. The views expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect those of the City of Monticello. Email correspondence to and from City of Monticello government offices is subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices and may be disclosed to third parties. WSB government • anergy • commercial 701 Xenia Avenue South City of Monticello May 26, 2016 Suite 300 Attn: Wayne Oberg, f=inance Director Project No: 01494-940 Minneapolis, MN 55416 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Invoice No: 15 Tel: (763) 541-4800Tex: {763} 541-1700 Monticello, MN 55362-8831 Block 34 Environmental Documents �14� _AtiQj CP No. BLK034 nlN�� Ijiv' � GL Acct #213.46301.431990 Professional Services from April 01, 2016 to April„JQ, 2016 Phase 7 Phase 11 ESA Professional Personnel Hours Rate Amount Environmental Documents Spencer, Ryan 4/27/2016 2.00 98.00 196.00 Spencer, Ryan 4/2812016 2.00 98.00 196.00 Totals 4.00 392.00 Total Labor 392.00 Total this Phase $392.00 Total this Invoice $392.00 Billings to Date Current Prior Total �J Labor 392.00 44,054.50 44,446.50 Consultant 0.00 9,136.50 9,136.50 Expense 0.00 2,076.49 2,076.49 Totals 392.00 55,267.49 55,659.49 Comments: Approved by: Reviewed by: Bret Weiss Project Manager: Ryan Spencer EDJUN - 2 2016 Equal Opportunity Employer wsheng.cam WSB government - energy • commercial City of Monticello Attn: Wayne Oberg, Finance Director 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362-8831 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 May 26, 2016 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Project No: 01494-720 Tel: (763) 541-4800 Invoice No: 34 Fax: {763) 541-1700 Economic Development & Market Matching GL Acct #213,46301.431990 Professional Sgrvices from April 01, 2016 to April 0 2016 Phase 03 2016 ------------------------ -- Fee Total Fee 16,000.00 Percent Complete 100.00 Total Earned 16,000.00 Previous Fee Billing 12,000.00 Current Fee Billing 4,000.00 Total Fee 4,000.00 Total this Phase $4,000.00 Total this Invoice $4,000.00 �d Comments: Approved by: Reviewed by: Bret Weiss Project Manager: Breanne Rothstein Equal Opportunity Employer wsheng.com O N In O It, T O� In lD N M O O O N N N ig y a 4J yJ Q 72 C� u 1:1 o fl N C� C I rl tri i.� • Q O � O � O Q C'l � N N O � C0 N In O It, T O� In lD N M O O O N N N ig y a C� C I Q O � O � O � � N N O � C0 c a� ai � Q a� � O O O Q = (n Q J Q � � a � CYi C U � N I� Q � � F Q Vendor Date of Transaeiion CITY OF MONTICELLO Ghost Card Transaction Please attach the invoice/ receipt and any other available documentation to this form. To be completed by purchaser: Amount $ -�� Expense Code Circle purchaser name: Debbie Davidson =JulieChen�e) Si a re Jim Thares From: Sent: To: Subject: Registration Confirmation Marcy Anderson <marcy@monticellocci.com> Monday, May 16, 2016 7:36 AM Jim Thares Confirmation: 2016 Chamber Lunch -MCC Your registration for 2016 Chamber Lunch -MCC has been received. Confirmation Number: e.1243.4866.47908 Primary Contact: Jim Thares (Monticello City of) Add to Calendar Edit Registration 41-1 /Z.,O( (a M,e�"i" 9t i10 �7 V 84 Sammry Item= _. Descrl,ptlnn Quantity Tota lAmt Chamber Lunch, Member Jim Thares 1 15.00 Total: 15.00 2016 Chamber Lunch -MCC TOPIC: ActionCOACH Business Coaching, Tuesday, May 17th join us for Chamber Lunch at Monticello Community Center from 11:30 am -1 pm. ****Ribbon cutting to follow the luncheon for ActionCOACH MetroNorth. CATERED BY: Von Hanson's Meats MENU: Carved Pork Loins, Roasted Chicken, Cole Slaw, Baby Red Potatoes, Roma Tomato Penne Pasta Salad, Watermelon Fruit Boat, Rolls and Butter, Pop and Water. BUSINESS LUNCH SPONSOR: If you want to to be recognized as the Chamber Lunch Sponsor contact the Chamber Office - Fee $100. Treasure Chest Drawing What sets our chamber apart from others? Our members become FRIENDS! Meet new members of the business community and old friends face to face while you enjoy a delicious lunch. We have a different speaker and topic that pertains to business each month. Rrfng your staff or friends, chamber Lunch is open to all anyone. Date: May 17, 2016 Time: 11:30 AM - 01:00 PM CDT Website: Monticello Chamber Location: Monticello Community Center 505 Walnut St. Monticello, MN Contact: Monticello Chamber (763) 295-2700 Email: info(c�monticellocci.com Date/Time Details: Tuesday, May 17th l 4(0,03 Julie Cheney From: Auto -Receipt <noreply@mail.authorize.net> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 11:32 AM To: AP Subject: Transaction Receipt from Monticello Chamber of Commerce & Industry for $15.00 (USD) Description: Member payment for FiberNet Monticello : Chamber Member Lunch for Jim Thares EDA Invoice Number 894913 Billing Information Shipping Information Julie (FiberNet Monticello) Cheney City of Monticello 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362 us ap@ci.monticello.mn.us 763-295-2711 Total: $15.00 (USD) 0. Date/Time: 23 -May -2016 9:32:06 PDT Transaction ID: 8431635882 Payment Method: Visa xxxx8769 Transaction Type: Purchase Auth Code: 084690 Entry Mode: Keyed Monticello Chamber of Commerce & Industry Monticello, MN 55362 US marcy@monticetlocci.com I Julie Cheney From: info@monticelIocci.com Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 11:33 AM Subject: Online Payment Confirmation Your online payment request has been received by Monticello Chamber of Commerce and Industry. Payment Confirmation Name: Julie (FiberNet Monticello) Cheney Company: City of Monticello Transaction Number: 8431635882 CC Number: 8769 Amount: 15.00 Description Item(s) Quantity Total Amount Member payment for FiberNet Monticello Chamber Member Lunch for Jim Thares EDA 1 15.00 Grand Total: 15.00 This Email was automatically generated. For questions or feedback, please contact us at: Monticello Chamber of Commerce and Industry 205 Pine Street PO Box 192 Monticello, MN 55362 (763)295-2700 info@monticellocei.com http://rwww.monticellocei.com Vendor Date of Transaction � l��/ CITY OF MONTICELLO City Hall Card Transaction Please attach the invoice/receipt and any other available documentation to this form. To be completed by purchaser: Amount $ Circle purchaser name: Jeff O'Neill Kerry Burri Angela Schumann icki Leerhoff Tracy Ergen Wayne Oberg Sarah Rathlisberger Jennifer Schreiber Jim Thares yo jo-'-.4 Employee Signature Date approved Special Project # or Description Circle department code: 101-41110 City Council 101-41310 Administration 101-41410 Elections 101-41520 Finance 101-41800 Human Resources 101-41910 Planning and Zoning 101-41920 Data Processing 101-41940 City Hall 213-46500 Economic Development 2 -46301 HRA Circle expense code: 421990 General Operating Supplies 431950 Newsletter Services 431990 Miscellaneous Prof Services 432200 Postage 433100 Travel/Training Expense 443300 Dues Membership & Subscrip __-44-37-0Q_,'.Licenses and Permits . 443990 Misc. Other Expense Other U • 11pX/ 11 ' Fast, Quality Printing Since 1975 763-295-3141 216 Cedar St., P.O. Box 235 montiprint@tds.net Monticello, MN 55362 C, rr Date 20 Sold to Address www.montiprinting.com 79" Heal I WjNIiCfl_I-U PRINTING 21.G CEDAR STREET HCHHUILU. AN 55362 GG3s 295 3191 11'. hand [G: 66117 I,-- II: 01102 store 1!: 0(J0T Ref It: 01)g Sale XXXXXXXXXXXX1015 VISA Entry Method; Mamal Total: $ A65 05/11/16 Inv II; 000601 Aw Code, 01421 Iransaction IO; 306132479726900 Apprvd; Online Batchll; 600153 AVS Code. ZIP MATCH Z CVV2 Code; MTCH M Customer COPY THAW YGu Vendor V . Date of Transaction CIT`! OF MONTICELLO City Hall Card Transaction Please attach the invoice/receipt and any other available documentation to this form. To be completed by purchaser: ©o Amount $ Circle purchaser name: Jeff O'Neill Kerry Burri Angela Schumann Vicki Leerhoff Tracy Ergen Wayne Oberg Sarah Rathlisberger Jennifer Schreiber Jim 7hares Circle department code: 101-41110 City Council 101-41310 Administration 101-41410 Elections 101-41520 Finance 101-41800 Human Resources 101-41910 Planning and Zoning 101-41920 Data Processing 101-41940 City Hall 213-46500 conomic Developme 213-45301 HRA Circle expense code: 421990 General Operating Supplies 431950 Newsletter Services 431990 Miscellaneous Prof Services 432200 33100 T_.�. �rauel��.rai.ci�g._Expen�e�,� 443300 Dues Membership & Subscrip 443700 Licenses and Permits 443990 Misc, Other Expense Other Invoice No. 200002018 - Economic Development Association of Minnesota Page 1 of 2 Economic Development Association Invoice of Minnesota Date Invoice # 5/20/2016 200002018 Bill To Jim Thares City o Monticello 505 Walnut Street Suite #1 Monticello, MN 55362 United States Ship To Jim Thares City o Monticello 505 Walnut Street Suite #1 Monticello, MN 55362 United States PO Number Terms Due Date Totals Due on 2016 EDAM Summer Conference - Full Conference - Jim Thares Discount (2016 EDAM Summer Conference - $25.00) $320,00 ($25.00) receipt 5/20/2016 Qty Description Price Totals 1 1 2016 EDAM Summer Conference - Full Conference - Jim Thares Discount (2016 EDAM Summer Conference - $25.00) $320,00 ($25.00) $320.00 ($25.00) Sub -Total $295.00 Total $295.00 Qty Description Price Totals 1 Payment via Credit Card (using card xxxxxxxxxxxx0480) Applied to invoice on 512012016 2:44:26 PM ($295.00) ($295.00) Total Payments]Adjustments ($295.00) Balance Due $0.00 1000 Westgate Drive, Suite 252 St. Paul, MN 55114 P: (651) 290-6296 F: (651) 290-2266 VISA MasterCard Card Number (required) Expiration Date 3 digit security code https:Hedam.site-ym.com/members/invoice—view.asp 5/20/2016 Economic Development Association of Minnesota Page 1 of 9 Print Page I Ccs€itact Lls I Report Abuse I My RI'Ofile ( Sign Out Entcr search criteria- IPRegister OlVlapthkEverit 0 Tell a. Friend 6/8/2016 to 6/10/2016 When: lune 8-10, 2015 where. Map thh; event» Duluth Entertainment Convention Center ( ECC) 350 Harbor Dr Duluth, Minnesota 5 802 United States YOU registered forthis event on 5/20/2015 ±GlS fFR Online registration is available until,, 6/8/2096 • View Sessions ar https://edam.site-ym.com/events/E`ventDetails.aspx?id=796076 5/20/2016 Economic Development Association of Minnesota Page 2 of 9 « Go to Upcoming Event List Download the 2016 Summer Conference Registration Form (PDF) o All registrations must be accompanied by full payment/purchase order to reserve your place at the event. We look forward to the 2016 EDAM Summer Conference on June 8 -10th at the Duluth Entertainment Convention Center in Duluth. The Professional Development Committee has planned another great conference program full of timely and informative educational sessions, great speakers, and opportunities for you to build valuable relationships with new and existing colleagues. Follow us on Twitter- @BDAM_MN and use this hashtag #EDAMDuluth Agenda -t -.-Glance View the complete agenda and speaker Bios! Wednesday —June 8, 2016 4:00-6:30pm Registration 1:00.5:30pm Exhibitor Set Up 4:30-:30pm Emerging Professionals Speakers: Erin Sparks, EDAM Member Services Committee Chair Eric Maass, Planner, WSB & Associates, Inc. 5:30-6:30pm President's Welcome Reception 6:30-7:30pm Networking, Games, Music, Social 7:30pm Networking - on your own Thursday — Jure 9, 2016 7:45arn-4: 00pm Registration 0:30-8:30am Breakfast at Canal Park Lodge (Included in your hotel stay if you are staying there) litips://edam.site-ym.coin/events/EventDetails,aspx?id=796076 5/20/2016 Economic Development Association of Minnesota 8:30-8:45arn 2016 Legislative Session Recap Matt Brown, EDAM Government Relations Committee Chair 8:45-9:00arn Welcome by Duluth Mayor Emily Larson Mayor Emily Larson Keynote Presentation Keynote Speaker Alan Hodnik, Chairman, President, and CEO, ALLETE 9:50-101 warn Break with Exhibitors 10:15-11:00am Idea Exchange - Tweet at us using #EDAMDuluth 11:00-11:30am Break with Exhibitors 11:30-12:30pm Idea Interchange - Tweet at us using #EDAMDu[uth 12:30-1:30pm Lunch and DEED Update 1:30-1:45pm EDAM's Story: Celebrating 50 Years Speakers: Megan Livgard, EDAM Second Vice President Adam Kienberger, EDAM First Vice President 2:00@3:00pm Future Development through the Window of Forecast Modeling Speakers: Dennis Farmer, AICP, Principal Forecaster, Metropolitan Council (register at check-out) 2:00-3:30pm Learning Tour: Vikre Distillery Speaker: Emily Vikre, PhD, President and Co -Founder Page 3 of 9 One of Duluth's most exciting emerging companies is in the craft distillery industry. Vikre Distillery is an incredible story of entrepreneurship — leaving promising careers on the east coast to start a new venture that aligns personal passions with the natural resources and beauty of the place you grew up. Sustainability, community, locally sourced ingredients, the environment., and the water of Lake Superior are cornerstones of this emerging business, which today is producing outstanding gin, aquavit, whiskey, and vodka in Canal Park. In addition to a tour, we will hear the story of this start-up business, where the journey https://edam.site-ym. con-i/events/EventDetails, aspx?id=796076 5/20/2016 Economic Development Association of Minnesota Page 4 of 9 from concept to ribbon cutting will be told. If entrepreneurship is an element of your economic development strategy, you won't want to miss this opportunity to hear about their original vision, site selection process, financing structure (including debt and equity), regulations and licensing, marketing strategies, how their business plan has evolved, and how they attract and retain talent that aligns with their company's core values. Also, you will hear what cities need to know if they want to attract entrepreneurs in the emerging craft distillery industry. Weather permitting, we will walk from the DECC to the distillery. Learn more about this company and its founders at www,vikredistillery.com Optional tastings will be available at 3:30 for a fee. 2:00„4:00pm St. Louis River Corridor Vision (Offsite Session) Speaker: Jim Wilby Williams, Director of Public Administration, City of Duluth Hans Johnson, Director of Recreational Lands, Minnesota Land Trust (limited space -- register at check-out) 4;00-6: 00pm Break 5:00pm Networking went — North Shore Scenic Railroad Friday — June 10, 201 8:15am-12:00pm Registration 6:30-8:30am Breakfast at Canal Park Lodge (Included in your hotel stay if you are staying there) 8:55am Deadline to Register for the Door Prize Drawing 9:00am Opening Remarks 9:05-9:50am Keynote Session: An Interview with Louis Jarnbois Speaker: Louis Jambois Interviewed by Tony Schertler 9:50-10:05am Break with Exhibitors 10:05.11:05am Understanding Aftercare: lessons from Foreign -Owned Enterprise Executives Speakers: Moderator: https://edatn.site-ym.com/events/EventDetails.aspx?id=796076 5/20/2016 Economic Development Association of Minnesota Page 5 of 9 Laurence Reszetar, Director, Foreign Direct Investment, Minnesota Trade Office Panelists: Evan Hoffman, Senior Manager, State Government Affairs, Organization for International Investment Bill King, Vice President, Business Administration, Cirrus Aircraft Chris Olsen, Vice President, Community and Government Affairs, Tate & Lyle Kapil Sharma, Vice President, Government and Public Affairs, North America, Wipro 11:05-11:15am Break with Exhibitors 11:1 am-12:15prn Early Childhood Programs Key to Workforce Gains Speakers: Mark Lofthus, Economic Development Director, Dakota Electric Association Todd Otis, Senior Vice President for External Relations, Think Small 12:15pm Door Prize Drawings and Adjourn Fees EDAM Member - Full Conference Early Rate: Payment received by May 12: $295 Regular Rate: Payment received after May 12: $320 Ilion -Member - Full Conference Early Rate: Payment received by May 12: $355 Regular Rate: Payment received after May 12: $420 Guest Ticket - Wednesday and Thursday evenings Early Rate: Payment received by May 12: $50 Regular Rate: Payment received after May 12: $50 Student - Fell Conference Early Rate: Payment received by May 12: $W Regular Rate: Payment received after May 12: $0* * Students: Use this form to submit an application for complementary Full Conference registration. Submissions must be made by noon on Friday, June 3. L ocatio_n Duluth Entertainment Convention Center 350 Harbor Dr Duluth, MN 55802 https://edam.site-ym,com/eveiits/EventDetails.aspx?id=796076 5/20/2016 Economic Development Association of Minnesota Page 6 of 9 Canal Park Lodge 250 Canal Park Dr Duluth, MN 55802 With the special rate of $129 for June 8th and 9th. If you would like to stay for the weekend we have the following special rates: All rates and rooms are subject to availability, • City Side Rooms - $149 • Lakeside Rooms - $169 Room Block Cut -Oft : May 12, 2016 so book today! Book by Calling: (218)279-6000 and ask for the EDAM Room Block. Website: http:l/canalparklodge,com/ Thank YQ1 mor! Di mond Sponsors Thursday Evening Sponsor Of ver Friday Keynote Speaker Sponsor Lanyard Sponsor Akd,, tar Tote Bag Sponsor NER AM mrnnesota power AFI/KL1_r TE. Y.)Mi'SAIv 4' Thursday Keynote Sponsor https:Hedalu.site-ym.con,i/events/EventDetails.aspx?id=796076 5/20/2016 Vendor Date of Transaction LP &4w CITY OF MONTICELLO City Hall Card Transaction Please attach the invoice/receipt and any other available documentation to this form. To be completed by purchaser: Amount $� Circle purchaser name: Jeff O'Neill Kerry Burri Angela Schumann Vicki Leerhoff Tracy Ergen Wayne Oberg Sarah Rathlisberger Jennifer Schreiber Jim Thares R lz� b Employee Signature Special Project # or Description Circle department code: 101-41110 City Council 101-41310 Administration 101-41410 Elections 101-41520 Finance 101-41800 Human Resources 101-41910 Planning and Zoning 101-41920 Data Processing 101-41940 City—Hall - ,- 213-46500" EcQnOrn_i_ Daye.Lo 2 3-46301 HRA Circle expense code: 421990 431950 431990 432200 433100 443300 443 _0- 443990 Other (� 16111 �dkA�40,13 General Operating Supplies Newsletter Services Miscellaneous Prof Services Postage Travel/Training Expense Dues Membership & Subscrip Licenses and Permits Misc. Other Expense CREDIT CARD ORDER 7347 Domino's Pizza (I63) 295-2424 6/2/2016 3;58 PM Order 514654 Server 7361 ---------------------------------- Delivery VICKI LEERHOFF 505 WALNUT ST C11Y HALT_ I EAST ENTRANCE OF MGC (763) 295-2711 ------------------------------ Visa CREDIT CARD # XXXXXXXXXXXX7045 RFFERENCE APPROVAL CODE 02.1690 ---------------------------------- Amount $48,59 1 i (a SIGNATURE 1 AGREE TO PAY THE ABOVE 101AL AMOUNT ACCORDING TO CARD ISSUER AGREEMENT Thank you for being a Piece of the Pie Rewards Homher! DEL EXPS M M o N x VJ /mo/••w� yJ 4---I� 'n Q � C� U 1:1 0 i.. V] • Q 0 U Q U cr 0 M M o N x i 0 0 Q N � N O � Q c Q � CfJ J Q � a I� - N co 0 'r - i Xcel Energy® RESPONSIBLE BY NATURE® YOUR MONTHLY ELECTRICITY USAGE M J J A S O N D d F M A M DAILY AVERAGES Last Year Temperature 48° F Electricity kWh 0,0 I Electricity Cost $0.63 QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR BILL? See our website: xcelenergy.com Email us at: Customerservice®xc91one rgy.com Please Call: 1-800-481-4700 Hearing Impaired: 1-800-895-4949 pax.. 1-800-311-0050 Or write us at: XCEL ENERGY PO BOX 8 EAU CLAIRE WI 54702-0008 XcerEnergy. NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY Page 1 of 8 SERVICE ADDRESS ACCOUNT NUMBER DOE i ATE MONTICELLO EDA 349 W BROADWAY ST MONTICELLO, MN 55362-9356 51-0623082-8 06/01/2016 STATEMENT NUMBER ISTATEMENT DATE i 500000141 05/04/2016 $18.03 SUMMARY OF CURRENT CHARGES (detailed charges begin on page 2) Electricity Service 04/04/16 - 05/03/16 7 kWh Current Charges ACCOUNT BALANCE Previous Balance Payment Received Balance Forward Current Charges Amount Due INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR BILL As of 04/04 Auto Pay 05/02 $18.03 $18.03 $18.01 -$18.01 CR $0.00 $18.03 $18.03 Customer facilities whose primary business purpose is as an iron mining extraction and processing facility, paper mill, wood products manufacturer, sawmill or oriented strand board manufacturer, may be eligible to have certain solar energy costs excluded from the electric portion of their bill. For more information please visit: xcelenergy,com/mnsese Thank you for your payment. RETURN BOTTOM PORTION WkTH YOUR PAYMENT -PLEASE 00 NOT USE STAPLES, TAPE OR PAPER CnPS ACCOUNT NUMBER I DUE DATE 51.0623082-8 I 06/01/2016 $18.03 Your bill is paid through an automated bank payment plan. AV 01 022673 68396E 78 A**5DGT III'11111'11111'1Jill 1111111,111,{101111111Jill 'Il,111111'111111 MONTICELLO EDA 505 WALNUT ST STE 1 MONTICELLO MN 55362-8831 Automated Bank Payment I,II[Il'11'I"1111"11'1111111'1111'Il'fllll'I,1111'1111l1'11'f'I XCEL ENERGY P.Q. BOX 9477 MPLS MN 55484-9477 31 51060116 06230828 0000000180300000001803 a Q o— If 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 36 I,II[Il'11'I"1111"11'1111111'1111'Il'fllll'I,1111'1111l1'11'f'I XCEL ENERGY P.Q. BOX 9477 MPLS MN 55484-9477 31 51060116 06230828 0000000180300000001803 a Q o— If XcelEnergy0 7 ®o -It -yourself Night Audit Conducting a nighttime audit of your business can help save energy and cut costs. Chock to see what lights, computers and other devices are on that shouldn't be. Source: energystar.gov Plant a Tree Pago 2 nr S SERVICE ADDRESS ACCOUNT NUMBER MONTICELLO EDA 51-0623082-8 06/01/2016 349 W BROADWAY ST MONTICELLO, MN 55362-9356 STATEMENT NUMBER STATEMENT DATE t 500000141 05/04/2016 $18.03 SERVICE ADDRESS: 349 W BROADWAY ST MONTICELLO, MN 55362-9355 NEXT READ DATE: 06/06/16 ELECTRICITY SERVICE DETAILS PREMISES NUMBER: 303657358 INVOICE NUMBER: 0619803187 ELECTRICITY CHARGES DESCR1P T 310 IN Basic Service Chg Energy Charge Winter Fuel Cost Charge Affordability Chrg Resource Adjustment Interim Rate Adj Subtotal City Fees Total INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR BILL RATE: Sm Gen Svc (Metered) UNITS RATE 7 kWh $0.074320 7 kWh $0.025714 CHARGE $10.80 $0.52 $0.18 $0.91 $0.04 $0.82 $12.53 $5.50 $18.03 For an average non -demand customer, 73% of your bill refers to power plant costs, 9% to high voltage line costs, and 18% to the cost of local wires connected to your business. For an average demand -billed customer, 83% of your total bill refers to power Plant costs, 9% to high voltage lines, and 8% to the cost of local wires connected to your business. A carefully positioned tree can prevent sunlight from pouring into windows, saving cooling energy and adding curb appeal to your business. Visitxcelenergy.com/Trees for more information. 7 XcelEnerave y 2016 Climate Leadership Award Xcel Energy received a 2016 Climate Leadership Award from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for our achievements and ongoing commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Visit epa.gov/climat®leadership to learn more. Be Aware of Scams page 3 of H SERVICE ADDRESS ACCOUNT NUMBER11 il MONTICELLO EDA 51-0623082-8 06/011/2016 349 W BROADWAY ST MONTICELLO, MN 55362.9355 STATEMENT NUMBER STATEMENT DATE 500000141 05/04/2016 $18.03 Take Advantage of Summer Savings Things are heating up] As temperatures continue to rise, check outthe ways to keep your energy bill low, Our rebates, programs and energy -efficiency tips can help your business save energy and money this summer. Simple changes can amount to big savings, so get started today. Visit xcelenergy,com for seasonal efficiency tips and to learn more about our energy efficiency programs, `a a2 0 If someone calls threatening to turn off your power due to an unpaid balance and asks you to pay with a prepaid or reioadable card, hang up the phone immediately. You may also be approached by people claiming to be with Xcel Energy and needing to do work at your business. Ask for Xcel Energy identification, and please, check with us if you're still not sure. Call us anytime at 1,800,481,4700, Don't let impostors steal your money. CD c b LO EDA Agenda — 07/13/16 6. Consideration of acceptance of Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) in Block 34 (JT) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: WSB recently completed a Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of contamination in Block 34 as authorized by the EDA. The Executive Summary report of the assessment work is completed and attached. It summarizes findings regarding the contaminants and offers a set of recommendations for further action. The main findings indicate there is no evidence of a large scale contaminant release from historical coal gasification or storage tank activities at the Site. The types and levels of contaminants in the soils at the Site will require engineering consultation during redevelopment as to specific reuse and/or disposal. Ryan Spencer, WSB, will be in attendance at the EDA meeting to review the findings and answer questions. The Link for the full Report is: http://www.ci.monticello.mn.us/index.asp?SEC=D9FDD892-OAC4-471C-BOEF- FEC4FAAEA4F7&DE=935B215A-8A50-4D59-85ED-AC7104972AC9&Type=B BASIC Al. STAFF IMPACT: There is minimal staff impact in considering acceptance of the Limited Phase II ESA. The consulting engineer prepared the report as required in the contract. Staff time involved in reviewing the report and preparing the Staff report has been fairly minimal. A2. BUDGET IMPACT: There is a no budgetary impact due to considering accepting the final Limited Phase II ESA report. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to accept the Limited Phase II ESA Report and accompanying recommendations (page 9) for Block 34. 2. Motion to deny acceptance of the Limited Phase II ESA Report and accompanying recommendations for Block 34. 3. Motion to table acceptance of the Limited Phase II ESA Report and accompanying recommendations for Block 34. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the EDA accept the Limited Phase II ESA and the accompanying recommendations (page 9) for Block 34. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Report prepared by WSB MontieRo Block 34 Monticello, MN June 6, 2016 Prepared for City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 1 Monticello, MN 55362 WSB Project No. 01494-940 FRRnm"11T.-TUITIC Block 34 Monticello, MN Prepared for: City of Monticello SO S Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Prepared by: WSB & Associates, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 June 6, 2016 Prepared by: David Mueller Environmental Scientist Limited Phase 11 ESA Block 34 WSB Project No. 01494-940 Reviewed by: Ryan Spencer Senior Environmental Scientist i 1 , TITLE SHEET 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................. 1 2. Previous Environmental Documents..................................................................................1 3. Phase II ESA Methods............................................................................................................. 3 3.1 Scope of Work........................................................................................................ 3 3.2 Deviations From Work Plan................................................................................. 4 3.3 Soil Sampling......................................................................................................... 4 3.4 Groundwater Sampling......................................................................................... 5 3.5 Soil Vapor Sampling.............................................................................................. 5 4. Phase II ESA Results............................................................................................................... 5 4.1 Soil Results............................................................................................................. 5 4.2 Groundwater Results............................................................................................ 6 4.3 Soil Vapor Results.................................................................................................. 7 5. Discussions and Conclusions................................................................................................ 8 6. Recommendations.................................................................................................................. 9 7. Limitations............................................................................................................................. 10 Limited Phase If ESA Block 34 WSB Project No. 01494-940 Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 - Site Location Map Figure 2 - Investigation Location Map LIST OF TABLES Table 1 - Soil Analytical Results Table 2 - Groundwater Analytical Results Table 3 - Soil Vapor Analytical Results LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A - Field Methods Appendix B - Soil Boring Logs Appendix C - Laboratory Reports Limited Phase 11 ESA Block 34 WSB Project No. 01494-940 1. Introduction WSB & Associates, Inc. (WSB) was retained by the City of Monticello (City) to complete a Limited Phase 11 Environmental Site Assessment (Limited Phase 11 ESA) at Block 34 in Monticello, Minnesota. The Limited Phase 11 ESA included the investigation of eight City owned parcels located at Block 34 (the Site). A Site Location Map is included as Figure 1. The purpose of the Limited Phase 11 ESA was to investigate subsurface conditions at the Site and to determine if historical coal gasification activities and/or storage tank usage have resulted in subsurface soil, groundwater, or soil gas impacts. WSB understands that the City intends to market the Site for future commercial redevelopment. 2. Previous Environmental Documents WSB has completed the following previous environmental documents for the Site: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Block 34, Monticello, Minnesota 55362, dated November 19, 2014 and prepared by WSB & Associates (the 2014 Phase I ESA). Response Action/Construction Contingency Plan, TH 25 and CSAH 75 Intersection Improvements, Monticello, Minnesota 55362, dated July 29, 2015 and prepared by WSB &Associates (the 2015 RAP/CCP). o Limited Site Investigation, Former Philips 66 Station, Leak 19812, 100 Broadway East, Monticello, MN 55362 dated November 6, 2015 and prepared by WSB & Associates (the 2015 LSI). Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Update, Block 34, Monticello, Minnesota 55362, dated February 12, 2016 and prepared by WSB & Associates (the 2016 Phase I ESA Update). Electronic copies of the above reports are available by request. The following is a summary of the previous environmental documents: 2014 Phase I ESA The 2014 Phase I ESA was performed according to ASTM E1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments. The 2014 Phase I ESA identified the following recognized environmental conditions (RECs) and historical recognized environmental conditions (HRECs) associated with the Site: Limited Phase 11 ESA Block 34 WSB Project No. 01494-940 Page 1 • REC-1*: Former gasoline service station (Phillips 66 Station) at 100 Broadway East • REC-2: Gas tank and possible coal gasification activities at 130 Broadway East • REC-3: Active service station at adjacent property - 200 Broadway East • HREC-1: Closed leak site at adjacent property - 316 Pine Street *A petroleum leak was discovered at 100 Broadway during building demolition (Leak 19812) and has since been investigated by WSB and received closure through the MPCA. Due to the closed status of Leak 19812, this site is currently considered a HREC as summarized in the 2016 Phase I ESA Update. 2015 RAPE CCP The 2015 RAP/CCP was prepared to manage contaminated soil associated with Leak Site 19812 at 100 Broadway East during the Trunk Highway (TH) 25 at County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 75 intersection improvement project. The 2015 RAP/CCP was developed to manage the petroleum impacted soil that may be encountered during intersection construction. To date, a total of 889.72 tons of petroleum impacted soil has been removed from the site at 100 Broadway East and disposed of at Vonco 11 landfill in Becker, Minnesota. Soil corrections were limited to contaminated soil encountered during construction activities and petroleum impacted soil remains at the site. RAP/CCP implementation and reporting is currently on-going. 2015 LSI The 2015 LSI was prepared to define the magnitude and extent of the release identified at the 100 Broadway East site (Leak Site 19812). Additional borings and analytical parameters were requested by MnDOT and completed during the LSI investigation. The LSI determined that the petroleum release, consisting of diesel range organics (DRO), semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), and lead were limited to the upper 4-6 feet of soil at the southern portion of the 100 Broadway East site. Additionally, low levels of DRO and lead were identified in shallow groundwater and a number of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were identified in shallow soils at 100 Broadway East and the adjacent TH 25 at CSAH 75 intersection. 2016 Phase I ESA Update The 2016 Phase I ESA Update was performed according to ASTM E1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments. The 2016 Phase I ESA Update included the addition of Wright County Parcel 155010035061 (located west of the Site) and Parcel 155218 (located north of the Site), as required by MnDOT prior to land conveyance for the TH 25 at CSAH 75 intersection improvements project. The following updates to the 2014 Phase I ESA were identified: Limited Phase 11 ESA Block 34 WSB Project No. 01494-940 Page 2 REC-1: Presence of former gasoline service station (Phillips 66 Station) at 100 Broadway East was changed to an HREC since the leak (19812) was investigated by WS13 and received closure from the MPCA 3. Limited Phase 11 ESA Methods 3.1 Scope of Work The purpose of the Limited Phase 11 ESA was to investigate subsurface conditions at the Site and to determine if historical coal gasification activities and/or storage tank usage have resulted in subsurface soil, groundwater, or soil gas impacts. WS13 understands that the City intends to market the Site for future commercial redevelopment. The following tasks were conducted as part of the investigation: Public and private utility locates were completed prior to boring advancement. Advanced 10 hydraulic push -probe borings to 20 feet below ground surface (bgs). Hydraulic push -probe borings were advanced by Bergerson-Caswell, Inc. using a truck -mounted geoprobe rig. Advanced four hand auger borings to a depth of 4 feet bgs at 130 Broadway East. Hand auger borings were advanced using an electric coring rig to penetrate the concrete slab. 0 Advanced four soil vapor points to a depth of 2 feet below bgs. Completed visual and olfactory assessment of soil boring samples for indications of contamination and screened soil for organic vapors using a photoionization detector (PID) equipped with a 10.6 eV lamp. Soil types and profiles were recorded on field boring logs. Collected 14 soil samples for laboratory analysis of: o Gasoline range organics (GRO) using the Wisconsin Method o Diesel range organics (DRO) using Wisconsin Method o Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8260 o Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Metals using EPA Method 6020 o Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) using EPA Method 8270 (8 samples) Collected 6 groundwater samples for laboratory analysis of: o GRO using the Wisconsin Method o DRO using Wisconsin Method Limited Phase 11 ESA Block 34 WSB Project No. 01494-940 Page 3 o VOCs using EPA Method 8260 o RCRA Metals using EPA Method 6020 a SVOCs using EPA Method 8270 (3 samples) • Collected 4 soil vapor samples for laboratory analysis of: o VOCs using EPA Method TO -15 ® Abandoned all soil and vapor borings in accordance with MDH regulations • Prepared a report detailing field observations, laboratory results, conclusions, and recommendations Details of the tasks completed during this investigation are summarized in the following sections and general field methods included as Appendix A. 3.2 Work Plan Deviations The following deviations from the proposed investigation work plan should be noted: • Select proposed boring locations were field modified due to the presence of underground utilities and other Site conditions • Boring refusal was encountered at all hand auger locations and boring advancement was limited to 1 to 2 feet bgs 3.3 Soil Sampling A total of ten (10) hydraulic push -probe soil borings (B-1 through B-10) and 4 hand auger borings (HA -1 through HA -4) were advanced at the Site on May 18 and 19, 2016. The hydraulic push -probe borings were completed by Bergeson -Caswell, Inc. of Maple Plain, Minnesota (Bergerson) and the hand auger borings were completed by WSB. All boring locations are depicted on Figure 2. Continuous sampling at four -foot intervals was conducted for the hydraulic push - probe borings to a terminal depth of 20 feet bgs. Hand auger samples were assessed at one foot intervals to a terminal depth of two feet bgs. Each soil sample was visually examined for evidence of contamination, field classified, and screened for organic vapors using a PID equipped with a 10.6 eV lamp. Soil boring logs are included as Appendix B. Fourteen (14) soil samples were collected during this investigation and submitted to TestAmerica Laboratory of Cedar Falls, Iowa (TestAmerica) for analysis of: DRO, GRO, VOCs, RCRA Metals, and SVOCs. Laboratory reports are included as Appendix C. Limited Phase Il ESA Block 34 WSB Project No. 01494-940 Page 4 Following completion of sampling and screening activities, all borings were sealed with bentonite grout in accordance with MDH requirements. 3.4 Groundwater Sampling A total of six (6) groundwater samples (G-1 through G-6) were collected by WSB at the Site on May 18, 2016. First groundwater was encountered below a clay confining layer at approximately 32 feet bgs. After groundwater levels were allowed to stabilize, static groundwater measurements ranged from 11 to 15 feet bgs. Groundwater samples were collected by installing a temporary PVC monitoring well screen and using a check valve and tubing to draw sample. The groundwater sample locations are depicted on Figure 2. The groundwater samples were submitted to TestAmerica for analysis of: DRO, GRO, VOCs and RCRA Metals for all samples and SVOCs for samples GW -1, GW -2, and GW - 4. Laboratory reports are included as Appendix C. 3.5 Soil Vapor Sampling A total of four (4) sub -slab soil vapor samples (V-1, V-3, V-4, and V-7) were collected by WSB at the Site on May 18, 2016. The soil vapor borings were advanced to a depth of up to 2 feet below the concrete slab and samples were collected using 1 - liter stainless steel canister equipped with a regulator calibrated for a 30 -minute sample. The soil vapor sample locations are depicted on Figure 2. The soil vapor samples were submitted to TestAmerica for laboratory analysis of VOCs. The table below outlines the soil vapor sampling details. Sample Depth in. Canister ID Start Time Start Vacuum (inches of Hg) Stop Time Stop Vacuum (inches of Hg) V-1 6 2745 1225 -30 1302 -3 V-3 6 5710 1502 -30 1532 -4 V-4 6 5440 1526 -30+ 1558 -4 V-7 1 6 4345 1552 1 -30+ 1 1625 -3 4. Phase 11 ESA Results 4.1 Soil Results The Site soils generally consisted of sand and silty sand in the upper 10-12 feet and was underlain by clay to the terminus depth of 20 feet bgs. No petroleum or chemical odors, staining or elevated PID readings above 10 parts per million (ppm) were observed during the investigation. Debris consisting of ash and pieces of concrete were observed in the hand auger boring below the slab at locations HA -1 through HA -4. Limited Phase 11 ESA Block 34 WSB Project No. 01494-940 Page 5 The soil analytical laboratory report is included as Appendix C and summarized in Table 1. For comparison purposes, the table also includes established Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) soil reference values (SRVs) and soil leaching values (SLVs). The following is a summary of analytical soil results: • No GRO or VOCs were detected above laboratory reporting limits. • Low level DRO concentrations were detected at ten sample locations ranging from 10.3 to 263 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). The DRO concentrations detected at location B-2 (4-6) and B-3 (4-6) exceeded the MPCA criteria for unregulated fill of 100 mg/kg. • Trace metals were detected at all sample locations below established industrial SRVs. Arsenic was detected at location HA -1 (0-1) at a concentration of 12.9 mg/kg, which is above the residential SRV of 9 mg/kg. • Benzo[a]pyrene and total benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) equivalent was detected in sample B-3 (4-6) at concentrations of 11 and 14.62 mg/kg, which are above the industrial SRVs of 2 mg/kg and 9 mg/kg, respectively. Other SVOCs were detected at sample B-3 (4-6), but at concentrations below the established residential SRVs and SLVs. 4.2 Groundwater Results First groundwater was encountered during the investigation at depths ranging from 30 to 34 bgs. After temporary well stabilization, static groundwater levels were recorded at depths ranging from 11.35 to 15.11 feet bgs. No sheen or chemical odors were observed in the groundwater. The groundwater analytical laboratory report is included in Appendix C and summarized in Table 2. For comparison purposes, the table also includes Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) health risk values (HRLs). The following is a summary of the analytical groundwater results: • No VOCs, SVOCs, DRO, or GRO were detected above laboratory reporting limits. • Low level metal concentrations were detected at all sample locations. Cadmium was detected at four sample locations at concentrations slightly above the HRL of 0.5 micrograms per liter (µg/L). The highest cadmium detected was observed at sample location GW -3 at concentration of 0.856 µg/L. Limited Phase 11 ESA Block 34 WSB Project No. 01494-940 Page 6 4.3 Soil Vapor Results Site soil generally consisted of silty sand and light brown fill to a depth of 2 feet bgs. No elevated PID readings, chemical or petroleum odors, or staining was observed at the soil vapor sample locations. The soil vapor analytical laboratory report is included in Appendix C and summarized in Table 3. For comparison purposes, the table also includes established MPCA intrusion screening values (ISVs). The following is a summary of the analytical soil vapor results: VOC compounds were detected at all four soil vapor sample locations (V-1, V- 3, V-4, and V-7). All VOC detections were below established residential/industrial ISV except for 1,1,2,2 -tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2 -trichloroethane, 1,2,4-triclilorobenzene, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, 1,2-dibromoethane, 1,2-dichloroethane, 1,2- dichloropropane, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, 1,3 -butadiene, 1,4 - dichlorobenzene, benzene, benzyl chloride, bromoform, bromomethane, carbon tetrachloride, chlorobenzene, chloroform, cis-1,2-dichloroethene, and ethylbenzene. • 1,2 dibromoethane exceeded the 10 times (10x) industrial ISV at sample location V-1. 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane and hexachlorobutadiene concentrations exceeded 10 times the industrial ISVs at sample location V-2. 1,1,2 -trichloroethane, 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene, 1,2-dichloroetha.ne, 1,3 - butadiene, benzyl chloride and trichloroethene concentrations exceeded 10 times the industrial ISVs at sample location V-3. 1,1,2,2 -tetrachloroethane, 1,2-dichloroethane and hexchlorobutadiene concentrations exceeded 10 times the industrial ISVs at sample location V-4. 1,1,2,2 -tetrachloroethane, 1,2-dibromoethane and hexachlorobutadiene concentrations at location V-3 exceeded 100 times the industrial ISVs at concentrations of 110, 120 and 160 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3). 1,2-dibromoethane exceeded 100 times the industrial ISV at locations V-2 and V-4 at concentrations of 15 and 25 µg/M3, respectively. Limited Phase It ESA Block 34 WSB Project No. 01494-940 Page 7 S. Discussions and Conclusions A Limited Phase 11 ESA was conducted to investigate subsurface conditions at the Site and to determine if historical coal gasification activities and/or storage tank usage have resulted in subsurface soil, groundwater, or soil gas impacts. The following is a summary and discussion of the Limited Phase 11 ESA results: • No elevated PID readings above 10 ppm, olfactory or visual indications of contamination were observed at the soil borings completed at the Site, with the exception of ash and concrete debris observed under the concrete slab of the 130 Broadway East building indicating urban fill. Urban fill is typical below buildings constructed in downtown area of this vintage. • The DRO concentrations detected in soil at location B-2 (4-6) and B-3 (4-6) exceed the MPCA criteria for unregulated fill of 100 mg/kg. Therefore, the reuse of soil in these areas will be restricted per MPCA guidelines. • The benzo[a]pyrene and BaP equivalents concentrations identified at soil boring B-3 were found to exceed the MPCA reuse criteria for unregulated fill. Therefore, the reuse of soil in these areas will be restricted per MPCA guidelines. • The low level arsenic concentration of 12.9 mg/kg detected in the soil sample HA -1 (0-1) exceeded the residential SRV, but is consistent with native background concentrations and does not represent evidence of a release. • The low level concentrations detected in the groundwater samples GW -2, GW -3, GW -4 and GW -8 slightly exceeded the HRL for cadmium. However, due to the lack of any detectable concentrations in the corresponding soil samples, the cadmium appears to be from a non -anthropogenic (i.e. native background) source. Due to the depth of first groundwater identified in soil borings at the site (>30 feet bgs), it is unlikely that groundwater will be encountered during redevelopment activities. • Lead concentrations identified at sample locations HA -1 (0-1) and HA -4 (0-1) were found to exceed the allowable limit for landfill acceptance of 100 mg/kg. A number of soil vapor concentrations exceeded either the 10X or 10OX industrial ISVs, therefore, an engineered vapor mitigation system (e.g. vapor barrier, active extraction system, etc.) may be required for new facilities developed at the Site. • The results do not definitively indicate a large scale release resulting from coal gasification or storage tank activities at the Site. Limited Phase 11 ESA Block 34 WSB Project No. 01494-940 Page 8 6. Recommendations The following recommendations are provided regarding the Limited Phase 11 ESA results: This investigation identified DRO, arsenic, BaP, and VOC impacts in the shallow soil (including vapor) that exceeded the MPCA threshold criteria. Therefore, these impacts should be reported to the Minnesota State Duty Officer. This investigation identified cadmium impacts in groundwater that exceeded MDH threshold criteria for drinking water. It is likely that these concentrations are representative of native background levels. However, due to the presence of two municipal water wells at the Site, these results should be reported to the Minnesota State Duty Officer. • Since VOC vapor concentrations exceeded 100 times industrial ISVs, additional vapor sampling should be completed at the Site prior to redevelopment. The additional vapor sampling should target the proposed building footprint areas and will be used to determine if a vapor barriers or mitigation systems will be required for newly constructed buildings. Due to the presence of DRO and debris impacted soil discovered below the slab at the 130 Broadway East building, an environmental professional should be onsite to assess soil during slab/footing and parking lot removal at this location. • Due to the presence of DRO at soil borings B-2 and B-3 and benzo[a]pyrene and BaP equivalents at soil boring B-3, an environmental professional should be onsite to assess soil for segregation and reuse at this location, ® Due to the elevated lead concentrations identified in soil samples HA -1 (0-1) and HA -4 (0-1), we recommend that toxicity characteristic leachate procedure (TCLP) analysis is conducted for the sample with the highest concentration, sample HA -1 (0-1). This analysis will be required for off-site reuse or disposal. Limited Phase 11 ESA Block 34 WSB Project No. 01494-940 Page 9 EDA Agenda — 07/13/16 7. Consideration of update of Storm Water Management System Proposal for Otter Creek Business Park (JT) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Due to the required use of the National Oceanographic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atlas 14 storm water management measurement standards, WSB, the City Engineer, has determined that the current storm water drainage system in Otter Creek Business Park needs to be reexamined. The advent of the changeover to Atlas 14 impacts all storm water drainage systems in the City. The timing of the Dahlheimer expansion becomes both an imminent need and an opportunity to answer questions specifically about the regional storm water ponding capacity in Otter Creek Business Park. This is important also in the realm of accurately marketing the land that remains available to prospective businesses. A Letter of Proposal with a Scope of Work and fee is attached for EDA review. Atlas 14 replaces storm water management standards that were adopted and used from 1970 until 2015. Consideration of this proposal will be presented to the City Council at an upcoming meeting. Al. STAFF IMPACT: Representatives from WSB will be present at the EDA meeting to discuss and answer any questions about the proposed study. Completing an update to the Storm Water Management System in Otter Creek Business Park will require time from the consulting engineer, WSB. City staff will have a small amount of time monitoring the work of the proposed engineering contract. A2. BUDGET IMPACT: The proposed cost to complete a Storm Water Management System update study in Otter Creek Business Park is $21,248. The City's Storm Water Trunk System fees are an appropriate source of funds for the study. The City will eventually have to reexamine the entire City-wide storm drainage system in the future. The cost of this study is a small portion of that cost. The ultimate decision to proceed with the study lies with the City Council. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. No Motion required — Update only. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: No Motion require — update only. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Letter of Proposal with Scope of Work and Fee from Shibani Bisson, P.E., WSB Guilvirlg a ;eg cy your I _gaLy. 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 July 7, 2016 Jeff O'Neill City Administrator City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Monticello Business Center Proposal to Perform Drainage Study Dear Mr. O'Neill: We appreciate the opportunity to assist you in performing a drainage study for the Monticello Business Center (MBC) area. The proposed study area is represented on the attached Figure for your reference. The overall outcome of this study will be to provide the City with a document that they can provide to future developers in this area as a guide for stormwater management due to the recent changes with stormwater management requirements. City standards require stormwater management for rate control, volume control and water quality control. Prior stormwater management standards for the state and nation included utilizing a lower rainfall event standard (TP40) that was developed in the 1960s. This was the standard used for all pond designed in the City, including the MBC. The National Weather Service Hydrometeorlogical Design Studies Center released a new standard in 2014 called NOAA Atlas 14, which agencies are currently utilizing when determining rainfall frequency estimates for stormwater ponding design. Atlas 14 standards results in higher rainfall intensities, therefore changing the allowable capacity of our ponds. Due to this change in standard, this creates the need to reevaluate the area and determine what additional stormwater management is needed based on the larger rainfall events. The results of this study will be useful to the City for determining the developable acreage on each parcel, after stormwater management is incorporated, and identify what the developer's responsibilities will be. All cities are facing this issue with the new Atlas 14 standards and most are requiring new development to make up the difference in the runoff volumes by adding additional ponding or expanding existing ponds. The City of Monticello could use trunk storm sewer and ponding fees to address this. Cities are also updating their current hydraulic models as well to align their overall water resource management plans with this new standard. As such, City staff requested WSB provide this proposal in light of recent development proposals within the MBC and to have the study completed in order to accurately market the remaining undeveloped properties. Outlined below please find the work plan associated with completing the study. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com C:\Users\Shibani.Bisson\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content Outlook\R9CDCIPR\Monticello Business Center Drainage Study Final 070716.doa July 7, 2016 Page 2 Task 1— Review Storm sewer and Pond As -Built Drawings This task consists of reviewing all as -built data for all existing storm sewer and ponds within the Monticello Business Center (MBC). There are three existing ponds within the study area. They are as follows: Chelsea Pond/Wetland Complex Pond adjacent to Karlsburger and Suburban Manufacturing Pond adjacent to Walker In -Store Construction of the ponds occurred in 2006, along with the associated stormsewer system. Task 1 will also summarize what the stormwater requirements are for the City of Monticello and how that applies to the MBC area. City stormwater management requirements for rate control, volume control and water quality control will be summarized and presented in an easy to follow document for potential future developers to use. Task 2 — Develop Existing Conditions HydroCAD Model This task includes reviewing the general hydrologic and hydraulic parameters used to establish the individual subwatershed discharges and creating an existing conditions HydroCAD Model. The 2-, 10- and 100- year Atlas 14 storm events will be analyzed. Hydrologic parameters reviewed typically include: acreage, land use, design rainfall event, impervious surface coverage, anticipated discharge rates, anticipated runoff volumes, etc. This task will include collection of background data used for the existing model. Data may include existing and future land use mapping, aerial photography, City parcel records, GIS shapefiles, existing zoning and land use regulations, etc. We will limit the review to only areas tributary to the MBC area. Hydraulic parameters will be based on as -built information, GIS stormsewer information as well as Lidar topo information for this effort. No field survey is anticipated or accommodated in this proposal. If it is found that field survey is required, that service can be provided at an additional fee. We will develop a drainage area map for the final report that will include the Tc, area, CN value and existing conditions runoff for each parcel. The updated Atlas 14 HydroCAD results will be tabulated and summarized for each of the drainage areas included in the model. This will include peak discharge rates and high water levels at each of the existing ponds along with freeboard requirements to the lowest building opening. Task 3 — Develop Fully Developed Proposed Conditions HydroCAD Models This task includes taking the existing conditions model developed as part of Task 2 and updating it to represent a fully developed scenario. Similar to Task 2, the 2-, 10- and 100 -year Atlas 14 storm events will be included in this task. The models will include an analysis of expanding the pond located adjacent to the Karlsburger and Suburban Manufacturing properties. It will also include the location of the potential ponding C:\Users\Shibani.Biswn\AppData\Local\Microwk\Windows\INetCache\Content.0utlook\R9CDCIPR\Monticello Business Center Drainage Study Final 070716.docz July 7, 2016 Page 3 areas. It is currently not known whether one or two additional ponds may be needed for the MBC. The models will also identify future ponding needs on the Chadwick/Bowers property between Chelsea Road and I-94. Results will be summarized for the models along with a recommendation to the City that considers developable acreage and overall best stormwater management for the area. Task 4 — Prepare Report This task includes preparing a final drainage study report to the City that can be used for future development in the area. This report will focus on City stormwater management standards, considering current standards, goals and policies. The report will be useful for the City to provide to future developers in the area and also to determine the actual marketable area within the development. Up to four figures will be created as part of the final report. Task 5 — Meetings One meeting will be held with City staff to review the draft report. One meeting will be held with the EDA to present the report. Estimated Cost Tasks 1— 4 are proposed to be completed on an hourly basis for an estimated not -to -exceed cost of $21,248. If the scope changes or additional options beyond that outlined above are requested, the fee above would increase accordingly. Upon approval of this proposal, WSB can complete the study within 2 months. Please contact us if you would like to discuss or need additional information. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. t G, ALA�-� Stacy Harwell Hoschka Shibani Bisson, P.E. Project Engineer Senior Municipal Project Manager C:\Users\shoschka\AppData\LonhM[crosoh\WlMowsVempormy Internet Filen\Contemt)utlook\537Mk070\k9ontlmllo 8usims Cenbr Uralwge3tudl July 7, 2016 Page 4 ACCEPTED B` : City of Monticello By: Title: Date: C;\Users\Shibani.Bisson\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Ontiook\R9CDCIPR\Monticello Business Center Drainage Study Final 070716.dorx 1 Obtain and Compile Stormsewer and Pond as -built Drawings 1.1 Complete site review, review existing records (as-builts) 12 12 $1,176 1.2 Summarize City Goals for Development within Drainage Area (RateNolume/Quality Standards) 4 15 19 $2,042 2 Develop Existing Conditions HydroCAD Model 2.1 Determine Model Parameters - Hydrologic and Hydraulic 4 4 $392 2.2 Create and Execute Model 2 20 22 $2,246 2.3 Compile Results and Writeup 8 2 10 $1,050 3 Develop Fully Developed Proposed Conditions HydroCAD Model - 3.1 Modify Existing Conditions Model to Incorporate Future and Full Development 20 8 28 $2,928 3.2 Compile Results and Writeup 2 15 2 $2,022 3.3 Internal QA/QC 4 4 8 $1,104 4 Prepare Report 4.1 Summarize Findings and Create Guidance Documentfor City and Developers within Study Area 2 30 32 $3,226 4.2 Prepare Report Figures (four total) 2 16 8 12 4 42 $4,670 5 Meetings 5.1 Present Report to City Staff 2 2 $196 5.2 Present Report at EDA Meeting 2 2 $196 Total Hours �- 4 - Average Hourly Fees (include overhead and profit) $143 $98 $133 $121 $75 K:�01488-92�Utl�ErM1IE1[slFton[ Sus—., - ft 2.tl ry, -3, I1/ly2Yu11:SO:PI PM EDA Agenda: 07/13/16 8. Consideration to direct preparation of an Amendment to the Contract for Private Development between Masters Fifth Avenue and the Monticello EDA and modification of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District 1-35. (AS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: EDA consideration of this item originally began at the April 13, 2016 meeting, where it then tabled action on the item - deferring any decision, to allow for consideration of the development stage PUD application by the City Council. The City Council acted on April 25, 2016 to approve the development stage PUD application for the proposed project. To further effect the PUD, the applicant will need approval of a final stage PUD and rezoning to PUD. The developer will therefore need to apply for final stage PUD for consideration and decision by the City Council as a next step. The EDA then considered the proposed Amendment at its May 11, 2016 meeting. Two motions were put forward with both of them resulting in a tie vote of the members; three (3) for and three (3) against. The respective motions were first to deny approval of the requested amendment and then to approve the item as presented. Both failed for lack of majority. Staff conferred with legal counsel and this item is allowed to come before the EDA again for consideration. To follow is the background information provided as part of the April EDA report. Masters Fifth Avenue has requested that the EDA consider amendment of the Contract for Private Development between Masters Fifth Avenue and the Monticello EDA, and modification of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for TIF District 1-35. At this time, the developer is not requesting additional tax increment, but rather a modification to allow for language revisions accommodating an "11,000 square foot or more commercial, residential or multi -use building". At present, the TIF Plan and contract for development specify development of an "11,000 square foot retail center" in the TIF District. TIF District 1-35 was certified in 2006, and was created to fund $170,000 in costs associated with the development of a proposed 11,000 square foot retail commercial project known as "Landmark Square IP'. The project area is a single parcel located at the northeast corner of Yd and Locust Streets. The tax increment generated in the district was intended to reimburse the developer for land acquisition through "pay-as-you-go" TIF assistance. 1 EDA Agenda: 07/13/16 The EDA approved an extension of the contract between the EDA and the developer in October of 2015 as related to TIF District 1-35. At that time, the developer indicated there was the potential for an exclusively residential project on the TIF district parcel. As the EDA is aware, the developer has submitted a land use application (CCD Residential Overlay rezoning request), as well as a Development Stage Planned Unit Development application through the City's Community Development Department. The applications submitted illustrate a 23 -unit residential project on the parcel. If the EDA is willing to consider the amendment and modification of the district as proposed, staff will have the EDA's attorney prepare the required documents for EDA decision in August. The City Council must also approve the TIF Plan Modification. However, no public hearing or other public notifications are required for this type of modification. Al. Budget Impact: Per the contract with the developer, the developer will be required to cover all costs associated with the modification. A2. Staff Workload Impact: An estimated 5 hours of staff and consulting time has been spent to -date in reviewing and responding to this most recent request. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to direct preparation of an Amendment to the Contract for Private Development between Masters 5t' Avenue and the Monticello EDA and modification of Tan Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District 1-35. 2. Motion of no action. 3. Motion to table this item for additional information. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As noted, the amendment of the contract and modification of the TIF District is a policy question for the EDA. When the TIF district was created, it was intended to spur and support private commercial redevelopment. If the EDA supports the proposed amendment and modification, Alternative 91 is recommended. If the EDA wishes to proceed under the original TIF Plan and contract as recently amended, Alternative 92 is appropriate. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Developer Request, March 18th, 2016 B. TIF Plan 1-35, excerpt C. TIF Management Plan, excerpt for TIF 1-35 D. Third Amendment to Contract for Private Redevelopment PJ Master's Fifth Avenue, Inc. 19577 180th Ave NW Big Lake, MN 55309 703-390-0393 March 18, 2016 TO: Monticello Economic Development Authority 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 March 18, 2016 Attention: Angela Schumann We request consideration at your meeting of April 13th to consider an administrative change to the TIF District 1-35 by amending the contract and TIF plan with Master's Fifth Avenue, Inc. to add the words "11,000 square foot or more commercial, residential or multi -use building" in place of the words "11,000 square foot retail center" in both documents. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Master's Fifth Avenue, Inc. Barry D. Fluth, president Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Tax Increment Financing District Overview City of Monticello Tax Increment Financing District No, 1-35 The following summary contains an overview of the basic elements of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for TIF District No. 1-35. More detailed information on each of these topics can be found in the complete TIF Plan. Proposed action: Establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-35 (District) and the adoption of a Tax Increment Financing Plan (TIF Plan). Adoption of a Redevelopment Plan Modification for the Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. 1. (The Modification is to include the project activities anticipated in the District.) Type of TIF District: A redevelopment district Parcel Numbers*: 155-010-036011** 155-010-036010** 155-010-036030** *These parcels will be combined via an administrative lot combination by the City of Monticello **These parcels ate "Knocked Down" parcels that are being removed from Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-22 to be included in Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-35. Proposed Development: The District is being created to facilitate construction of 11,000 s.f of commercial space consisting of a restaurant, office and other uses m the City of 'Monticello. This project is being proposed by a local developer. The value of the new development is estimated to be $70 per s.f plus land costs of approximately $230,000 for an esimated value of $1,000,000. The building will be completed in 2006 and the assistance of land acquisition, public improvements, site preparation, streets and sidewalks and utility costs will be funded on a pay-as-you- go basis at a rate of 6.5% TIF District Overview Maximum duration: The duration of the District will be 25 years from the date of receipt of the first increment (26 years of increment). The date of receipt of the first tax increment will be approximately 2008. Thus, it is estimated that the District, including any modifications of the TIF Plan for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate after 2033, or when the TIF Plan is satisfied. Estimated annual tax Up to $17,014 increment: Proposed uses: The TIF Plan contains a budget that authorizes the maximum amount that may be expended: Land/Building Acquisition ............................................... ..................... $104,000 Site Improvements/Preparation .......................................... . $35,000 Public Utilities................................................................... $35,000 Parking Facilities............................................................... $35,000 Streets and Sidewalks........................................................ $10,000 Interest............................................................................. $190,000 Administrative Costs (up to 10%) ...................................... $45,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS..........................................QQQ See Subsection 2-10, page 2-6 of the TIF Plan for the full budget authorization. Additional uses of funds are authorized which include inter -fund loans and transfers and bonded indebtedness. Form of financing: Financing will be primarily by a pay-as-you-go (PAYG) note. Administrative fee: Up to 10% of annual increment, if costs are justified. Interfund Loan Requirement: If the City wants to pay for administrative expenditures from a tax increment fund, it is recommended that a resolution authorizing a loan from another fund must be passed PRIOR to the issuance of the check. 4 Year Activity Rule After four years from the date of certification of the District one of the (§ 469.176 Subd 6) following activities must have been commenced on each parcel in the District: • Demolition • Rehabilitation • Renovation • Other site preparation (not including utility services such as sewer and water) • If the activity has not been started by the approximately September, 2009, no additional tax increment may be taken from that parcel until the commencement of a qualifying activity. Page 2 TIF District Overview 5 Year Rule Within 5 years of certification revenues derived from tax increments (f 469.1763 Subd 3) must be expended or obligated to be expended. Tax increments are considered to have been expended on an activity within the District if one of the following occurs: • The revenues are actually paid to a third party with respect to the activity • Bonds, the proceeds of which must be used to nuance the activity, are issued and sold to a third party, the revenues are spent to repay the bonds, and the proceeds of the bonds either are reasonably expected to be spent before the end of the later of (i) the five year period, or (ii) a reasonable temporary period within the meaning of the use of that term under §. 148(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code, or are deposited in a reasonably required reserve or replacement fund • Binding contracts with a third party are entered into for performance of the activity and the revenues are spent under the contractual obligation • Costs with respect to the activity are paid and the revenues are spent to reimburse for payment of the costs, including interest on unreirnbursed costs. Any obligations in the Tax Increment District made after approximately September, 2010, will not be eligible for repayment from tax increments. The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the TEF Plan for the District, as required pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 3, are included in Exhibit A of the City Council Adopting Resolution. Page 3 TIF DWct Overview MAPS OF CENTRAL MONTICELLO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. I-35 Page 4 Proposed Tax Incren...c Financing Dftict Na Central Monticello Redevelopment Project N City of Monticello Wright County, Minnesota Proposed Tax increment Financing District No. 135 District 1-35 is a redevelopment TIF district. The Dis- trict was established to assist with the construction of 11,000 square foot commercial building. The District was created from parcels removed from District 1-22. This approach established new time limits that con- strain use of increments in District 1.22. The tax incre- ment from District 1-35 is obligated to repay a $170,000 developer note at an interest rate of 6%. The note will end at a date no later than 2/1/2023. Ninety percent (90%) of annual tax increment is used to make pay- ment on the note. The District will be decertified no later than December 31, 2033. The development planned for District 1-35 has not happened. Actions Taken Since 2009 Funds have been transferred into TIF District 1-35 from TIF District 1-22 to cover administrative expenses incurred for TIF 1-35. Administrative Steps There are no outstanding administrative items. Management Strategy The strategy for District 1-35 focuses on using the ex- isting district to undertake redevelopment on this par- cel. The factors that allow the creation of a new re- development district have been removed. A new TIF district is not an option. Clearance of the site satisfied the criteria of the 4 -year knock down requirements. Management of this District benefits from 2009 amend- ments to the TIF Act. The limitations of the five-year rule are extended to ten years for the District. Obli- gations for the use of tax increments must now be in CityNumber ......................................... ....................................................... 1-35 CountyNumber..........................................................................................635 Name.................................................................................Landmark Square II Type......................................................................................... Redevelopment Established.............................................................................................9/12/05 Certification Requested.................................................................12/29/05 Certified.................................................................................................... 811/06 Year of First Increment.............................................................................2008 4 -Year Knockdown................................................................................8/1/12 5 -Year Rule...............................................................................................8/1/16 Decertification...................................................................................12/31 /33 Original Tax Rate..............................................................................110.297% Original Tax Capacity Value...................................................................3,409 Current Base Tax Capacity Val ue .........................................................6,068 Current (Pay 2012) Tax Capacity..........................................................2,962 Parcels...................................................................................................................1 155-010-036030 place by August 1, 2016. The financial implications and options for this District cannot be fully analyzed until development occurs. District Summary (District 1-35 (Landmark Square II) Redevelopment 1,,N 43 THIRD AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT This agreement is made as of December J , 2015, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a public body politic and corporate (the `BDA") and MASTERS FIFTH AVENUE, INC., a Minnesota corporation (the "Developer"). WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Monticello ("HRA") and Developer entered into that certain Contract for Private Development dated September 7, 2005, as amended by an Amendment thereto dated as of June 7, 2006 and a Second Amendment thereto dated as of December 18, 2007 (as so amended, the "Contract") providing, among other things, for the construction of an approximately 11,000 square foot retail center, with associated parking, known as Landmark Square Il (the "Minimum Improvements") on the property legally described within the Contract (the "Development Property") within the City of Monticello (the "City"); and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City has taken the necessary steps to allocate all powers and projects of the HRA to the EDA, and the HRA, by its Resolution No. 2007-085, dated October 22nd, 2008, has transferred and assigned to the EDA all outstanding contracts to which the HRA is a party, including the Contract; and WHEREAS, the Developer has requested and the EDA has determined to extend the dates of commencement and completion of construction of the Minimum Improvements described in the Contract. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the other as follows: Section 3.4(a) of the Contract is amended as follows: (a) Subject to the terms and conditions of this agreement, the Land Acquisition Costs will be reimbursed to the Developer with simple interest thereon 6.50% per annum, interest commencing to accrue on the date that the Developer complies with the cost certification requirement described in paragraph (f) of this Section. The Land Acquisition Costs will be reimbursed by the Authority to the Developer in semi-annual installments payable on each February 1 and August 1 ("Payment Dates") commencing August 1, 2022 and concluding no later than the Termination Date. These payments will be made from Available Tax Increment as defined in this Section 3.4 and from no other source. 2. Section 4.3 of the Contract is amended as follows: (c) Commencement and Completion of Construction. Subject to Unavoidable Delays, the Developer shall commence construction of the Minimum Improvements by November 1, 2020. Subject to Unavoidable Delays, the Developer shall complete the construction of the Minimum Improvements by December 31, 2021. All work with respect to the Minimum Improvements to be constructed or provided by the Developer on the Development Property shall be in conformity with the Construction Plans as submitted by the Developer and approved by the Authority. 4718941 MNIMN190-115 3. Miscellaneous. Except as amended by this Amendment, the Contract shall remain in full force and effect. Upon execution, the Developer shall reimburse the EDA for all out -of pocket - costs incurred by the EDA in connection with negotiating, drafting and approval of this Amendment. (The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.) 471894v1 MNl MN190-115 Dated this 9th day of December, 2015. Masters Fifth Avenue, Inc. By: � G� Its o 471894v1 MN1 MN 190-115 City of Monticello Economic Development Authority B Its President By: Its E c Director EDA Agenda — 07/13/16 9. Consideration of discussion of protective covenants for Outlots E and F, Otter Creek Crossing as related to outdoor storage (JT) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: At the June meeting, the EDA directed staff to discuss the first draft of standards allowing outdoor storage with the prospective business desiring to locate in Otter Creek Business Park. The feedback received from the business was that the standards would all be acceptable except the restriction regarding the amount of outdoor storage relative to the building. They would prefer to have the standard allow up to 50 percent of a building (plan to build a 30,000 to 40,000 sq. ft. facility). That would mean outdoor storage of 15,000 to 20,000 sq. ft. The key issue in the discussion is the size or volume of land area devoted to outdoor storage relative to the principal building or the entire lot area. The draft standards indicate allowed storage of 30 percent of the principal building. It does not include a capped amount of area although this may be a tweak that could be considered. The overall end goal should still be to achieve development in the business park that helps it retain its high quality elements and visual attractiveness. Al. STAFF IMPACT: There is minimal staff impact in considering amending the covenants and researching possible outdoor storage standards. Staff has a relatively small amount of time committed to this research to date including time spent communicating with and soliciting comments from the prospective business. There may be additional time committed to this effort based on the EDA's discussion and direction. The consultant planner assisted by providing the sample ordinance from another City in the region. A2. BUDGET IMPACT: There is a low budgetary impact due to the EDA's discussion of outdoor storage standards. There has been a very small cost to involve the consultant planner in the discussion. This expense will be paid from the EDA general fund. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to authorize staff to work on additional "Next Steps" research of outdoor storage standards related to a possible amendment of the Protective Covenants in Otter Creek Crossing and review with all property owners in Otter Creek Business Park. 2. Motion to table further discussion/research of outdoor storage standards related to a possible amendment of the Protective Covenants in Otter Creek Crossing. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the EDA authorize the "Next Steps" consisting of "Illustration example" and "Discussion with property owners". D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Outdoor Storage Discussion — Possible Standards B. Sample Outdoor Storage Ordinance (e-mailed from Steve Grittman, NAC) C. E-mail from prospective business desiring to expand/locate in Otter Creek Business Park D. Map of Otter Creek Business Park Otter Creek — Outlots E and F Outdoor Storage Discussion Open and Outdoor Storage as an accessory use under covenants, provided that: • Outdoor storage shall be limited to 30% of the gross square footage of the principal building. • The storage area shall not occupy any portion of the yard between the front building line and the adjoining public street, or the side building line and public street on a corner lot. • Outdoor storage areas must be 10' from all property lines and when adjacent to properties zoned other than industrial, shall be located a minimum of 50' feet from the adjacent property line. • The storage area shall not occupy any space required for conformity to the parking regulations of the Zoning Ordinance. • Outdoor storage areas must be kept in an orderly condition, permitting vehicular access to all materials or equipment. Lanes at least twenty (20) feet in width shall be required to meet this standard. No portion of the outdoor storage shall be more than fifty (50) feet from any access lane or other drive aisle, nor shall it block access to hydrants, fire sprinklers, or other fire -fighting equipment. • All outdoor storage must be screened completely from any right of way and adjacent property. Screening shall consist of masonry walls or fencing constructed of wood or vinyl and shall provide for 100% opacity. Gates shall be an exception to this requirement. Additional landscaping of one evergreen tree per 6' of linear fenceline required to be planted on exterior of outdoor storage area. Fences shall meet the height requirements of this ordinance. Metal fencing may be used where landscaping provides a complete year-round screen and is irrigated to ensure survivability in compliance. • Outdoor storage shall be allowed only on improved surface of asphalt or concrete. • Storage in shipping containers shall be prohibited. • There shall be no storage of hazardous materials, as defined by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. • Waste or recyclable material shall be contained in a refuse container. All such containers shall be stored within a screened enclosure per the requirements of this ordinance. • The property, including buildings and exterior site areas, shall comply with all applicable fire codes. • All lighting and noise shall be in compliance with this Ordinance. NEXT STEPS Illustration example Discussion with property owners Vicki Leerhoff From: Stephen Grittman <sgrittman@nacplanning.com> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 12:39 PM To: Angela Schumann Subject: RE: Outdoor Storage Language Thanks for the reminder — here are the two clauses, both for Conditional Use Permits, one for the lesser standard industrial district (1-1), and one for the higher standard district (I -P). Let me know if you have any questions. -sg 1-1, Light Industrial (lower standards): G. Open and Outdoor Storage as an accessory use, provided that: 1. The activity of outdoor storage shall require a separate business license issued by the City of Little Canada. 2. The storage area in question occupies an area no greater than sixty (60) percent of the gross square footage of the subject parcel. 3. The storage area shall not occupy any portion of the yard between the front building line and the adjoining public street, or the side building line and public street on a corner lot. 4. The storage is utilized solely by those tenants of the principal building in an amount proportionate to each tenant's occupancy of said principal building. 5. The outdoor storage of equipment or materials, as defined by this Ordinance, must be capable of moving under its own power, stored on a trailer, stored within weather-proof containers, or other storage arrangements as approved by the City Council. Storage of any material directly on the ground when the dimensions of such item are less than three (3) feet in width, length, and height, shall be prohibited wherever the City Council determines that reasonable alternatives exist consistent with this section. 6. When storage or shipping containers are utilized, the following regulations shall apply: a. Containers shall be those manufactured expressly for the purpose of storing and/or shipping materials. b. No container, for the purpose of this ordinance, shall be greater than forty (40) feet in length, eight (8) feet in width, or eight and one half (8.5) feet in height. c. No more than one (1) such container may be allowed for each seven thousand five hundred (7,500) square feet of lot area. d. Containers shall not be stacked or arranged to exceed the eight and onehalf (8.5) foot height. e. Containers shall be painted to match or be complementary in color to the principal building, and shall be maintained to avoid rusting or other visible deterioration of the container. f. There shall be no storage of hazardous materials, as defined by the zoning ordinance Section 902 of this Ordinance, within any such container. 7. Outdoor storage areas must be kept in an orderly condition, permitting vehicular access to all materials or equipment. Lanes at least twenty (20) feet in width shall be required to meet this standard. No portion of the outdoor storage shall be more than fifty (50) feet from any access lane or other drive aisle, nor shall it block access to hydrants, fire sprinklers, or other fire -fighting equipment. Except for construction equipment which is stored or parked in its most compact condition, outdoor storage may not exceed eight (8) feet in height as measured from the ground on which it is located. 8. The storage area shall be fenced and fully screened from adjoining non -industrial property, park and trail areas, and public right of way. Where properly fenced and screened, outdoor storage may encroach into the required side or rear yard setback area. Gates may be excluded from this screening requirement as provided for in Section 903.020.0.6. 9. Screening shall consist of masonry walls or fencing constructed of wood or vinyl, as well as landscaping. Metal fencing may be used where landscaping provides a complete year-round screen and is irrigated to ensure survivability in compliance with Section 903.020.F (Fences) of this Ordinance. 10. Waste or recyclable material shall be contained in a refuse container. All such containers shall be stored within a screened enclosure within the rear yard of the property. 11. The storage area shall be paved with asphalt, concrete, or other material approved by the City Council. 12. The storage area shall not occupy any space required for conformity to the parking regulations of the Zoning Ordinance. 13. The property, including buildings and exterior site areas, shall comply with all applicable fire codes. 14. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source shall not be visible from the public right-of-way or from neighboring residential uses, and shall be in compliance with Section 903.020.1 of the Zoning Ordinance. 15. All other provisions and requirements as deemed necessary by the City Council. I -P, Industrial Park District (higher standards): A. Open and outdoor storage as an accessory use, provided that: 1. Storage area, in combination with semi -truck or trailer parking as defined in Section 918.040.6 of this Ordinance does not exceed twenty-five (25) percent of the gross floor area of the principal structure or ten (10) percent of the lot area, whichever is less. 2. The area is fenced and screened from view of neighboring residential uses and districts in compliance with Section 903.020.G of this Ordinance. Depending on the height of the equipment and/or materials to be stored, additional screening may be required. 3. Storage is screened from view of the public right-of-way in compliance with Section 903.020.G of this Ordinance. Depending on the height of the equipment and/or materials to be stored, additional screening may be required. Gates may be excluded from this screening requirement as provided for in Section 903.020.0.6. 4. Storage area is black top or concrete. 5. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source shall not be visible from the public right-of-way or from neighboring residences and shall be in compliance with Sections 902.020.1 of this Ordinance. 6. Area does not take up parking space as required for conformity to this Ordinance. 7. The provisions of Section 921.010.0 of this Ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met. 2 8. No outdoor storage area shall include storage of materials that are considered hazardous materials by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. 9. No outdoor storage shall be permitted in any yard except the rear yard of the property. In any yard, no outdoor storage area in the I -P, Industrial Park District, shall be closer to any property line than ten (10) feet. 10. When storage or shipping containers are utilized, the following regulations shall apply: a. Containers shall be those manufactured expressly for the purpose of storing and/or shipping materials. b. No container, for the purpose of this ordinance, shall be greater than forty (40) feet in length, eight (8) feet in width, or eight and one half (8.5) feet in height. c. No more than one (1) such container may be allowed for each fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet of lot area, but shall in no case exceed the provisions for outdoor storage in the I -P zoning district generally. d. Containers shall not be stacked or arranged to exceed the eight and onehalf (8.5) foot height. e. Containers shall be painted to match or be complementary in color to the principal building, and shall be maintained to avoid rusting or other visible deterioration of the container. f. There shall be no storage of hazardous materials, as defined by the zoning ordinance Section 902 of this Ordinance, within any such container. From: Angela Schumann [mailto:Angela.Schumann@ci.monticello.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 12:29 PM To: Stephen Grittman <sgrittman@nacplanning.com> Subject: Outdoor Storage Language Steve, Can you send me the outdoor storage language you referenced Tuesday? Angela Schumann, AICP Community Development Director City of Monticello www.ci.monticello.mn.us 763-271-3224 Email correspondence to and from the City of Monticello government office is subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and may be disclosed to third parties. 3 Jim Thares From: Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 1:01 PM To: Jim Thares Subject: Otter Creek Jim, Sorry for the delay in getting back to you on this. The only suggested change we would have is to allow for outdoor storage up to 50% of the building size. That would be enough for us, but depending on the lot, we may need to make the fenced in area large enough (larger than 50%) to get a truck in to unload the pipe. If this looks like a go for the city, I would like to meet you at Otter Creek to take a closer look at the parcel and to discuss some of the finance options. Thanks Title April 25, 201 — -- GU.18 VIEWDR G 0 L F c:«:d1hq CAi Way �ey Wr CI i u aff N off- � K I I 1 inch = 752 feet City Boundary Ney C*-(Ll Uv-C v) V %� ��'% tr /,�(('C��Bryan Pittman ciry of Ga° 1075 x �O = Ur' ! �+ t V Monticello o �r Cy-c,K 3 Yd CO-W V) a h ts 5 1 A x 150 cit Ib%5 f Map Powered byDataLink ('f�/� 0 w h 5 f O+, from WSB&Associates n PPICIAL PLAT OTTER CREEK CROSSING list, sr •� IW \I `��yy� £.,t_ Y.AY ILAT COI NO, FdOH'Nn: fi�iR <"n j I SS �NO YS �589Y)0'rJ J �. , a 5 K - w Y.I •¢ot. , r :..--- T�..53�5 9-i= -=a }g I. y « V • r9- ___ e _ "�' -_ ]as..•. �___�. ___ I N I 04] \4 - \=a Nftr l9tAi5 �N00911�"E ____ n I � A '„m a. vn��]a¢ a• `''w,t.3°�mm1�e�¢' g \ CPS\o n ° I ra` � ..; 'saw __,: w,.. .°�'__� \��•\ �xC � � � iN� \�' �trV aDS�iai=- � . ry �� I k � Ex�yp I fir' fid` �, • gA \ �, •z.,�n� . -� Iwo . <mu„-� -- \' ' I "=8 'S1e; 1�\ �\ � ` ' �='.�ow « d^maw s..i�` .'ate: i•9w :i0 I \{ GL_t¢_^ook ._,_.-.._.._ tlb CMN^ * \ i� s"'$ISL I \�$ �. ( � i�n�"5-•es^� ---- \\�qt,�\ OUTLOTC" Yrsl t i §•�.._, I psi �}Ilaei s`$ I¢6. a. Mw'ion'ivwn 8 4A �pa� WAOT B S' Iqs-i� K. leP - Coit' � "'c .'"s - s•p \'' ,\ � ? \ •r-c»�� � _�'=. �.'�,��n\�i\i Vii'• / s'? J �1-\g � \ 3 �.',JN8937is'W �3� Zf• ♦ \\�_ c/ 4I`�� t .aasnrd ? f I':+m]+rmt .d+e s,. •.��— _ _ —'-_ m.,9m„� n M rn`nwA I 1>'. Punt 'f 1 —Y¢c ,$ui iV. r 'r• \ ♦4 r ` � ' \ \ \ I \ I \�S Y o - e<�'q 4� ♦. oEraL \ \ \ '\u - .i• " • e lean¢ km mmymmt o ..xm•�« ]n na er a xm no, mm�.eml tnm e t Mn+n ene \ \ � \ \ �, a f� . � \ v ♦♦�\♦ � •1 / `d�,e" 8'�1 %V ♦♦�c ♦♦♦♦ OUTLOT E I �YI I 1 I rax 9x1 ae �t noe er tn< AM 1 Xd 14e.a•eel Wwtw or SMIm t0 Tmront ♦ p \•�� \r `144 I t 1 ` II \\ 1 II 1 \♦ 1\ . \@ � \y♦• ; wum ymores are _ I �menn4114�0.Lro�Mm- I J . y�-♦ 1 \\ e uysyemmn._____•_- K� rig rye r 5�,b w� bwVl. SHEET 3 Of 3 SHktl'. 1 —Y¢c ,$ui iV. 'r• � ' \ \ \ c '' -r \�S Y o - e<�'q 4� ♦. oEraL \ \ \ '\u - .i• " • e lean¢ km mmymmt o ..xm•�« ]n na er a xm no, mm�.eml tnm e t Mn+n ene \ \ � \ \ �, pw ¢r ¢s¢p°xy of tnk qo4 mw4M MM 4lnn¢sota Rry4lrelxn Ho. 2590e. f� . � \ v ♦♦�\♦ � •1 / `d�,e" .. � \ �: f` Wrolee vn mne ' / , moi° •♦ N \' ♦\ \ rax 9x1 ae �t noe er tn< AM 1 Xd 14e.a•eel Wwtw or SMIm t0 Tmront ��(x lAT 1. 1 •. ¢�•♦ � \ , / / � t,{�, i / '4y S�?'9✓/gyp \ ��(Q/.� \ \ \ tat Rwa D, xr,9nt L¢untY. Y'enee9la 1¢ oewmatl l9 b¢m 500'49'�OB/yET^\ •••�\. �eei;�� \'rte J . K� rig rye r 5�,b w� bwVl. SHEET 3 Of 3 SHktl'. MLB naNf"m N. To SW, vrrAollffl. MR, OFF C"ffA OPOW, MM Y", 4, 0, 0, fFIOYV L .,1494.44 OUTLOT A 65 83 T— 14 OUTLOT B 12 loot dromo v..J uf//IfY `inti -,4 j --OUTLOT E J, LOT 2 •C1 JOjJ �j FLOCK MSp 64 's 4, ill -jj aw OUTLOT C �N;Rie -4 t OUTLOT D MA naNf"m N. To SW, I LOT I I BLOCK 1 65 83 OUTLOT B 12 loot dromo v..J uf//IfY % L aw ------ ------- ------ I— 988'S4'20'E 1331.021 1331.02\ -- — -->-- $`3<O? naNf"m N. To SW, EDA Agenda — 07/13/16 10. Consideration of direction re2ardin2 a Small Area Study in Downtown Monticello to guide redevelopment and reinvestment (JT) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The EDA vision and strategy meeting held on June 2, 2016 resulted in a better understanding of the EDA's top priority and the second and third areas of focus. The meeting facilitated by Phil Barnes, WSB, focused discussion on each of three possible priorities consisting of. Industrial development, Downtown Redevelopment and Housing Development and/or programs. A consensus process among the members arrived at an understanding that Downtown Redevelopment should be the priority focus area in the near future. The meeting helped members come to understand that due to changes and recent investments that have occurred in the core commercial district, components of the current plan for downtown is are no longer valid. It was further agreed that it would be appropriate to develop a new scaled down and focused vision for areas where there is a real potential for development. The visioning process should not be extensive and focus on the four corners at the intersection MNTH25 and County Road 75, plus additional blocks to the west of TH25, including the "Anchor Block". The process should be budget minded and consider the inclusion of housing as a supportive use in the downtown. In light of these discussion points and the consensus of the EDA members, staff are seeking direction regarding RFPs for a small area study in the downtown. Funding is included in the proposed 2017 EDA budget allowing the study to be completed in 2017. The EDA is being asked to review and offer feedback on the proposed budget at the meeting also. Al. STAFF IMPACT: The staff impact will consist of a numerous meetings with the consultant(s) that may ultimately be chosen to work on a small area study. An initial estimate of hours of staff time involved in preparing an RFP, reviewing submitted proposals and presenting the results to the EDA for consideration is 40 to 50 hours. Follow on time commitments will naturally be involved in meeting with consultants and monitoring the progress of the study. An estimate of that time is very rough at this point but may exceed 100 hours. The current commitment of time is limited to general discussion among staff and preparation of this report along with the exhibits. A2. BUDGET IMPACT: The budget impact of completing a public component small area study is estimated to be approximately $45,000 to $55,000. There is a line item included in the proposed 2017 EDA budget that is intended to cover this expenditure. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to direct staff to prepare RFPs for EDA review and comment. 2. Motion for no action Motion to table consideration of a small area study for further research and information C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: If the EDA feels that completing a small area study will provide benefit and value in forming a new focused vision and guiding plan for the downtown, it would be appropriate to act on Alternative 91. If the EDA is not of the belief that there are benefits to completing a small area study to regain focus on an outdated downtown plan, then Alternative 92 is appropriate. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. EDA Vision -Strategy Meeting Minutes of June 2, 2016 B. Prospective Small Area Study confines in Downtown Monticello Meeting Minutes WORKSHOP- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA) Thursday, June 2nd, 2016 (4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.) Academy Room, Monticello Community Center Attendance EDA: Bill Demeules, Bill Tapper, Steve Johnson, Tracy Hinz, & James Davidson Council members: Tom Perrault & Charlotte Galder. Staff: Angela Schumann, Jim Thares Facilitator: Phil Barnes (WSB & Associates) Meeting Minutes • Angela Schumann kicked off the meeting by thanking all those in attendance & describing the agenda for the meeting. The goal is to create more focus for EDA & City efforts related to Economic Development. • Phil Barnes (WSB & Associates) suggested that the goal for today is to begin finding key & focused actions. Phil then described the workshop process & developed ground rules with participants that are conducive to effective partnerships. • Phil then discussed the structure for the discussion. This included the development of a brand statement & discussion on Industrial Development, Downtown & Housing barriers. Major barriers would then help create focus for development of actions for the EDA & City. • Phil then facilitated a short branding exercise & discussion that resulted in the following brand Monticello is an energetic community engaged as a leader in technology, creating a positive environment and pathways for innovative commerce and business. Industrial Development BARRIERS TO THE MONTICELLO BRAND: Participants agreed that a barrier to industrial development is the reputation of Monticello. This includes the developer's perspective of Monticello's decision making process. Developers can potentially see Monticello as difficult to work with. Monticello may have challenges aligning EDA and Council messaging to developers. Discussions also focused on the lack of strategy on the business type and size Monticello is pursuing. It was suggested that Monticello may undervalue or underestimate its assets and potential and therein focus too much on attracting smaller businesses and compromising standards. The participants agreed that Monticello may have opportunities with larger publicly held businesses. AGREED UPON AREA OF ACTION & FOCUS #1: Participants envisioned that Monticello should focus on creating a communication structure and a shortened application for business development guiding developers in their investment decision. The guidance will focus messaging around what Monticello can do for them; to help facilitate their development proposals. Guidance will also attempt to align EDA and Council messaging to developers. AGREED UPON AREA OF ACTION & FOCUS #2: Participants would like to see the development of a marketing package and plan that shares the story of Monticello in a positive light. This marketing effort will focus on attracting high technology and precision manufacturing firms. The package and plan will be re -focused on an agreed upon brand statement. This package and plan will feature the investment in gigabyte fiber technology, reduced occupancy costs, access to energy and transportation network, productive tax rate, development success stories and other components that will showcase Monticello. AGREED UPON AREA OF ACTION & FOCUS #3: Revaluate standards to ensure flexibility is available to facilitate cutting edge business development. Consolidate a communication package that discusses and features the positives and benefits of standards and a pathway of being flexible with developers. Downtown Development • BARRIERS TO THE MONTICELLO BRAND: Given changes and recent investments in downtown, participants agreed that there is no longer a valid vision for downtown and they will struggle to move forward without a vision. Other discussions included traffic, unrealistic redevelopment and feelings that Monticello "takes what it can get". Monticello previously envisioned an "anchor" retailer and it appears that downtown may now lack the space. AGREED UPON AREA OF ACTION & FOCUS #4: Develop a scaled down and focused vision for areas where there is real potential and momentum for development. The visioning process should not be extensive and instead be focused on areas west of TH 25 and near the "four corners". The visioning process should create a dialogue with interested and potentially impacted major stakeholders like Cargill. The visioning process should proceed with caution and be budget minded. The process should include researching Walgreens' location decision and the possibility of a senior housing anchor for the development of convenience retail. Housing BARRIERS TO THE MONTICELLO BRAND: Participants agreed that there is no focus or experience working on the housing program(s). There is limited interaction with the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency or County programs. There is no aggressive policy on affordable housing and there remain questions regarding how the term "affordable" is defined. AGREED UPON AREA OF ACTION & FOCUS #5: Participants see an opportunity to learn through working through one major project and completing a research scan of other housing programs. The Merrill Busch Rand Mansion was discussed as the potential project that could be redeveloped into senior housing with preservation of cultural and historic features. After identifying housing program best practices, staff will work on a process to ensure the residents and developers interested in rehabilitation of blighted housing are offered housing program incentives automatically. SUMMARY NOTE: A consensus derived among the EDA members regarding the priority of the work objectives is as follows: The top priority is to focus on downtown redevelopment of blocks 52, 34 and other core central business district parcels. With that in mind, the EDA should consider a completing a small area study in the near future to guide the redevelopment of a core area of the downtown. The second and third priorities are to focus respectively on industrial development activities and housing programs/projects and/or tools offering residential rehab opportunities as blight mitigation and facilitating processes that help in meeting the needs of the affordable and senior demographic segments of the community. Meeting Adjourned at 7:00 pm Figure 20 illustrates Refined Scheme A as the recommended basis for the further definition of financial feasibility and implementation plans and phasing for redevelopment of downtown Monticello. The framework of land use districts, areas for maintaining existing development, areas for promoting redevelopment, approaches to transportation corridors, and improvements to preserve and enhance the downtown image are represented in Refined Scheme A. These elements will become the basis for policies and guidelines to direct future development and redevelopment in the CCD. tw+yM:MGS '( �1 p.[ia PhRK .--•8Fp,�,o Jjf '1W9lli'Ei$ p � A, � m+cwtt J 4Y j Wvice SICCET W a '_`.�__ S 1 Figure 20 — Refined Scheme A pssi{.le 5��1 5+ "J Table 8 on the following page summarizes the potential redevelopment square footage illustrated for the CCD north of 5th Street, and identifies the block by block change from the existing condition. 44 EDA Agenda — 07/13/16 11. Consideration of draft 2017 EDA Budget and Lew (JT) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: A draft 2017 budget is presented to the EDA for review and feedback. The proposed budget contains funding that should help carry out key work items consisting of paying for full-time staff, completing a small area study in the downtown core, additional marketing assistance on a scaled down basis and redevelopment expenditures in the amount of $105,000 +/-. The major change from the 2016 budget is the Miscellaneous Professional Services line item , which includes $50,000 for a small area study. The Market Matching line item has also decreased by $3,000. The Market Matching II plan will be presented for consideration by the EDA at a future meeting as a separate contractual decision for services. The 2017 budget process is just starting and will continue into August and September. At the August 10th meeting, the HRA/EDA Budget and Levy will be presented to the EDA for final adoption by resolution. Staff will take your feedback on the proposed budget and levy from this meeting, revise it as directed and bring it back for final consideration in August. The proposed Tax levy of $309,500 is calculated at the allowed rate of .00185 x the total taxable market value of real and personal property in the City. A precise calculation can be computed after the City's 2017 valuation figures are received from Wright County in early August. Note that consistent with the EDA Enabling Resolution, the EDA budget requires review and acceptance by the City Council. A copy of the resolution that the City Council adopted for the levy and budget in 2015 (for 2016) is attached. Al. STAFF IMPACT: The staff impact due to presenting the 2017 budget to the EDA for review and feedback is estimated to be approximately 4 or 5 hours (includes time during the EDA meetings). A2. BUDGET IMPACT: The cost of presenting the 2017 budget to the EDA for review and feedback is minimal. It is part of the normal work duties of the EDA Executive Director and is a good practice that should lead to a solid budget. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion as appropriate determined by the EDA regarding modifying the draft 2017 EDA budget and levy. 2. Motion to table review and feedback of the draft 2017 EDA budget and levy C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the EDA act as appropriate regarding modifying the draft 2017 EDA budget and levy. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Draft 2017 EDA Budget and Tax Levy proposal B. Resolution City Council — re EDA Budget and Levy (Copy from 2015) 2017 Budget Draft EXPENDITURES: SPECIAL REVENUE FUND ACCOUNT NUMBER EXPENDITURES EDA FUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 2017 EDA General EDA/HRA ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE 213-46301-410100 SALARIES, FULL TIME - REG $ 9,883 $ 2,209 $ 4,255 $ 7,173 $ 66,560 $ 66,560 $ 68,570 3.02% 21346301-410200 SALARIES, FULL TIME - OT - - 66 363 - --- 21346301-410400 SALARIES, TEMPORARY -REG - 213-46301-410900 SALARIES, OTHER - - - 213-46301-411100 SEVERANCE PAY - - - - --- 213-46301-412100 PERA CONTRIBUTIONS 716 160 314 565 41992 4,992 5,143 3.02% 21346301-412200 FICA CONTRIBUTIONS 728 153 298 545 5,092 5,092 5,246 3.02% 21346301-413100 HEALTH/DENTAL/LIFE INSURAN 2,579 594 999 1,899 17,916 17,916 18,658 4.14% 21346301-413500 FLEX BENEFITS - - - - - 213-46301-415100 737_7____ 213-46301-421990 Worker Compensation ______________ GENL OPERATING SUPPLIES 7373___ 7373___ 1,170 - 7373____ 36 7373___ 65 309 7373___ - 309 ______________ - 319 750 324% --- 21346301422990 MISC REPAIR & MTC SUPPLIES - 213-46301-424100 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT 21346301430260 PROF SRV - CONSTRUCTION CO - - - --- 21346301430300 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING FEE 4,461 - 5,379 - 1,000 1,000 2,500 150.00% 21346301430400 PROF SRV - LEGAL FEES 10,487 6,306 17,724 9,130 10,000 10,000 10,000 0.00% 21346301430910 PROF SRV - Market Matching - 24,000 48,000 48,000 12,000 12,000 9,000 -25.000/6 21346301431990 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 32,936 997 30,874 49,150 10,000 10,000 60,000 500.00% 21346301432150 IT Services 691 1,400 1,416 1,409 1,409 1,409 21346301432400 DELIVERY MAIL SERVICE (UPS 109 46 24 10 - - 50 --- 21346301433100 TRAVEL EXPENSE 290 3 - - 500 500 1,000 100.00% 21346301433100 CONFERENCE & SCHOOLS 148 95 76 - 1,000 1,000 1,000 0.00% 21346301434600 MARKETING 13,047 723 1,144 5,650 5,000 5,000 5,000 0.00% 21346301435100 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 274 260 77 5,360 500 500 750 50.00% 21346301435100 GENERAL PUBLIC INFORMATION 399 - - - 213-46301-436100 Insurance - Liability/Property/Vehicle 2,073 8,026 1,937 758 758 1,490 21346301437100 PROPERTYTAXES - 1,628 1,512 1,356 1,300 1,300 1,350 3.85% 21346301438200 WATER & SEWER - - - - - - 213-46301-438100 GAS - - - 213-46301-443300 DUES, MEMBERSHIP & SUBSCRI 4,309 2,373 3,041 4,696 9,000 9,000 9,500 5.56% 21346301-461500 REDEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES 260 - - - 155,000 155,000 105,000 -3226% 21346301-443990 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 658 2,323 2,901 11,072 2,664 2,664 2,700 1.35% 21346301-451010 LAND (or value adjusted) - 55,800 71,000 732,900 - - - --- 213-46301-453010 IMPROVEMENTS - - - 213-46301-458010 Other Equipment 21346301460300 Interfund Loan- Principal 21346301461300 Interfund Loan- Interest 21346301461500 SA INT PYBL-LAND FOR RESAL 21346301472030 TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND 21346301472030 TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE F 21346301472030 TRANSFER OUT -TRUNK FEES - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 82,454 $ 100,434 $ 197,146 $ 881,287 $ 305,000 $ 305,000 $ 309,435 1.45% EDA FUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 EDA - TIF Admin TIF Administration ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE 21346301-410100 SALARIES, FULL TIME - REG $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ 21346301-410200 SALARIES, FULL TIME - OT 21346301-410400 SALARIES, TEMPORARY -REG 21346301-410900 SALARIES, OTHER 21346301-411100 SEVERANCE PAY 21346301-412100 PERA CONTRIBUTIONS 21346301-412200 FICA CONTRIBUTIONS 21346301-412200 MEDICARE CONTRIBUTIONS TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ $ $ $ $ $ EDA FUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 2017 EDA -TIF 5 TIF #5- CONSTRUCTION 5 ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE 21346505430400 PROF SRV - LEGAL FEES $ 1,044 $ $ $ $ $ $ 21346505431990 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 393 21346505435100 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 28 21346505437100 PROPERTYTAXES - 213-46505-451010 LAND 21346505452010 BUILDINGS 21346505460300 DEBT SRV PRINCIPAL -SH RT TE 21346505461300 DEBT SRV INTEREST -SH RT TER 21346505462010 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 21346505465120 LOCAL CONTRIB - TIF PENALT 21346505472030 TRANSFER TO CONSTRUCTION - 460,401 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 1,465 $ 460,401 $ $ $ $ EDA FUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 EDA -TIF 6 TIF #6 -RAIN DANCE ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED CHANGE 21346506430400 PROF SRV - LEGAL FEES $ - $ 576 $ $ $ $ 21346506431990 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 393 2,760 21346506435100 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 28 225 21346506460300 DEBT SRV PRINCIPAL -SH RT TE - - 213-46506-461300 DEBT SRV INTEREST -SH RT TER 21346506-462010 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 21346506-465120 1 LOCAL CONTRIB - TIF PENALT 2017 Budget Draft EXPENDITURES: FISCAL AGENTS' FEES - 21346506472030 TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE F - - 21346519-465010 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 421 $ 3,561 $ $ $ $ TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 18,509 $ 5,939 21346519-465110 TIF PAYBACK INSTALLMENTS EDA FUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 2017 EDA -TIF 19 TIF#19-MISSISSIPPI SHORES ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE 213-46519-430300 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING FEE $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ 213-46519-430400 PROF SRV - LEGAL FEES 1,409 TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE F 213-46519-431990 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,568 2013 --- 213-46519-435100 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 28 20 26 26 50 50 0.00% 213-46519-443990 MISC OTHER EXPENSE - - - --- 213-46519-451010 LAND - ACTUAL - - f 213-46519-460300 InterFund Loan- Principal CHANGE EDA FUND 213-46519-461300 InterFund Loan - Interest 2014 - 21346519-462010 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES - - - - - 21346519-465010 TIF LOAN --- TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 18,509 $ 5,939 21346519-465110 TIF PAYBACK INSTALLMENTS $ 6,832 $ 6,832 $ 6,832 0.00% 21346519-465120 LOCAL CONTRIB - TIF PENALT 21346519472030 TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE F EDA FUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 4,005 $ 20 $ 26 $ 26 $ 50 $ 50 ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE EDA FUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 EDA -TIF 20 TIF #20 - PRAIRIE WEST ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED 21346520430300 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING FEE $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 213-46520-430400 PROF SRV - LEGAL FEES 150 21,684 9,682 100 100 21346520431990 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 393 - - - 500 500 21346520435100 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 28 20 26 26 50 50 21346520443990 MISC OTHER EXPENSE - - - - - - 213-46520-451010 LAND 213-46522-438100 GAS, Electric, Water, Sewer, etc. 7,105 7,928 - 213-46520-460300 InterFund Loan- Principal 10,023 --- 213-46522-443990 - 21346520461300 InterFund Loan - Interest 740 195,267 195,000 21346520462010 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES - 118,248 - 126,398 215,187 21346520465010 TIF LOAN - - 213-46522-460300 InterFund Loan - Principal - 21346520465110 TIF PAYBACK INSTALLMENTS 7,175 5,919 5,786 6,182 6,182 6,182 21346520465120 LOCAL CONTRIB - TIF PENALT - - - - - 2017 BUDGET CHANGE 100 500 0.00oo 50 0.00 6,,W 0.00 21346520472030 TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE F - - - - - - - --- TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 18,509 $ 5,939 $ 5,812 $ 6,208 $ 6,832 $ 6,832 $ 6,832 0.00% EDA FUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 2017 EDA -TIF 22 TIF#22-DWNTWN REDEVELOPMT ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE 21346522430300 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING FEE $ - $ - $ - $ $ $ $ 21346522430400 PROF SRV - LEGAL FEES 15,282 7,187 3,219 --- 21346522431990 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 90,966 21,684 9,682 29,705 1,707 1,707 1,707 0.00% 213 46522 435100 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 211 20 26 26 501195,000 50 50 0.00 213 46522 436100 213-46522-437100 Insurance -Liability/Property/Vehicle PROPERTYTAXES 20,862 32,603 16,788 - 732732 -- 100.00 213-46522-438100 GAS, Electric, Water, Sewer, etc. 7,105 7,928 4,600 365 -- --- 213-46522-443990 Excess Increment to County - - 595,959 195,267 195,000 000% 213-46522-451010 LAND 118,248 307,824 126,398 215,187 --- 213-46522-460300 InterFund Loan - Principal - - - - -- 213-46522-461300 InterFund Loan - Interest 21346522462010 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 21346522465010 TIF LOAN - - - - - - 213-46522-465110 TIF PAYBACK INSTALLMENTS 63,313 60,946 63,371 50,684 50,683 50,683 50,6870.00% 21346522465120 LOCAL CONTRIB - TIF PENALT - - - - - - 213-46522-472030 TRANSFER TO OTHER FUNDS 378,680 21346522472030 TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE F - - - - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 694,667 $ 438,192 $ 820,043 $ 491,234 $ 248,172 $ 248,172 $ 247,440 -029% EDA FUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 2017 EDA - TIF 24 TIF #24 - ST BEN'S CENTER ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE 21346524-430300 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING FEE $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ 21346524-430400 PROF SRV - LEGAL FEES 150 - --- 21346524-431990 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 393 100 100 100 0.00% 21346524-435100 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 28 20 26 26 50 50 50 0.00% 21346524-443990 MISC OTHER EXPENSE - - - - - --- 21346524-451010 LAND 21346524-460300 InterFund Loan- Principal 21346524-461300 InterFund Loan - Interest 21346524-462010 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 21346524-465010 TIF LOAN - - - - - 213-46524-465110 TIF PAYBACK INSTALLMENTS 42,959 41,886 42,959 35,545 35,545 35,545 35,545 0.00% 21346524-465120 LOCAL CONTRIB - TIF PENALT - - - - - - - --- 21346524-472030 TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE F - - - - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 43,530 $ 41,906 $ 42,985 $ 35,571 $ 35,695 $ 35,695JBUDGI 0.00% EDA FUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 EDA -TIF 29 TIF #29 - FRONT PORCH ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED CHANGE 213-46529-430300 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING FEE $ - $ $ $ - $ $ 213-46529-430400 PROF SRV - LEGAL FEES 151 463 ---- 213-46529-431990 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 393 - 100 100000% 213-46529-435100 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 28 20 26 26 50 50000% 213-46529-443990 MISC OTHER EXPENSE - - - - - ---- 21346529-451010 LAND 21346529-460300 InterFund Loan - Principal 2017 Budget Draft EXPENDITURES: 21346529461300 Interfund Loan - Interest 21346529462010 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 21346529465010 TIF LOAN 21346529465110 TIF PAYBACK INSTALLMENTS 18,989 14,373 16,496 16,861 16,861 16,861 16,861 0.00% 21346529465120 LOCAL CONTRIB - TIF PENALT - - - - - - 21346529472030 TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE F - - - - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 19,561 $ 14,393 $ 16,522 $ 17,350 $ 17,011 $ 17,011 0.00% EDA FUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 2017 EDA-TIF 30 TIF #30-CMHP ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE 21346530430300 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING FEE $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ 21346530430400 PROF SRV - LEGAL FEES - - --- 21346530431990 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 393 - - - 100 100 100 0.00% 21346530435100 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 28 20 26 26 50 50 0.00% 21346530443990 MISC OTHER EXPENSE - - - - - - --- 21346530451010 LAND - - - - --- 21346530460300 Interfund Loan- Principal 3,860 2,324 2,324 3,601 4,428 4,428 4 0.00% 21346530461300 Interfund Loan- Interest 3,829 3,751 3,751 3,492 3,492 3 0.00% 21346530462010 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES - - - - 213-46530-465010 TIF LOAN - 213-46530-465110 TIF PAYBACK INSTALLMENTS 21346530465120 LOCAL CONTRIB - TIF PENALT 21346530472030 TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE F - - - - - - --- TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 8,110 $ 6,095 $ 6,101 $ 3,627 $ 8,070 $ 8,070 0.00% EDA FUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 EDA-TIF 34 TIF #34 -194/INTERCHANGE ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED CHANGE 21346534-430300 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING FEE $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 21346534-430400 PROF SRV - LEGAL FEES - - - --- 21346534-431990 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 393 - - - 100 100 0.00% 21346534-435100 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 28 20 26 26 50 50 0.00% 21346534-443990 MISC OTHER EXPENSE - - - --- 213-46534-451010 LAND - - - 213-46534-460300 Interfund Loan- Principal 21346534-461300 Interfund Loan - Interest 21346534-462010 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 21346534-465010 TIF LOAN 21346534-465110 TIF PAYBACK INSTALLMENTS 21346534-465120 LOCAL CONTRIB - TIF PENALT - - - - - - --- 21346534-472030 TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE F 320,584 319,403 218,353 218,353 200,000 200,000 0.00% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 321,005 $ 319,423 $ 218,379 $ 218,379 $ 200,150 $ 200,150 0.00% EDA FUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 EDA -TIF 35 TIF #35 - LANDMARK SQUARE 11 ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED 5-430300 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING FEE $ $ $ $ 592 $ $ 213-46535-430400 PROF SRV - LEGAL FEES - 213-46535-431990 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 393 - - VHA213-4653 213-46535-435100 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 28 20 26 26 50 50 213-46535-443990 MISC OTHER EXPENSE - - - - - -213-46535-451010 LAND 21346535460300 Interfund Loan- Principal 21346535461300 Interfund Loan - Interest 21346535462010 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 21346535465010 TIF LOAN 21346535465110 TIF PAYBACK INSTALLMENTS 21346535465120 LOCAL CONTRIB - TIF PENALT 21346535472030 TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE F - - - - - - - --- TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 421 $ 20 $ 26 $ 618 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 0.00% EDA FUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 2017 EDA-TIF 36 TIF #36-DAHLHEIMER DIST ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE 21346536430300 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING FEE $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 21346536430400 PROF SRV - LEGAL FEES 21346536431990 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 393 21346536435100 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 28 20 21346536443990 MISC OTHER EXPENSE - - 213-46536-451010 LAND - - 213-46536-460300 Interfund Loan- Principal 45,512 47,529 47,529 6,694 21346536461300 Interfund Loan - Interest 18,291 15,734 15,734 - 213-46536-462010 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES - - 213-46536-465010 TIF LOAN - 213-46536-465110 TIF PAYBACK INSTALLMENTS 21346536465120 LOCAL CONTRIB - TIF PENALT 21346536472030 TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE F - - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 64,224 $ 63,283 $ 63,263 $ 6,694 $ $ #DIV/01 EDA FUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 EDA-TIF 37 TIF #37-KARLSBURGER FOODS ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED CHANGE 21346537430250 PROF SRV - CONSTRUCTION CO $ $ $ $ $ $ 21346537430300 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING FEE 21346537430400 PROF SRV - LEGAL FEES 21346537431990 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 393 21346537435100 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 28 20 26 26 --- 21346537443990 1 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 2017 Budget Draft EXPENDITURES: 21346537451010 LAND 21346537460300 Interfund Loan - Principal 19,297 20,249 20,249 21346537461300 Interfund Loan - Interest 5,253 4,220 4,220 21346537462010 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES - - - 213-46537-465010 TIF LOAN 21346537465110 TIF PAYBACK INSTALLMENTS 21346537465120 LOCAL CONTRIB - TIF PENALT 21346537472030 TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE F - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 24,971 $ 24,489 $ 24,495 $ 26 $ $ $ #DIV/01 EDA FUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 0 2017 EDA -TIF 38 TIF #38 -WALKER IN-STORE ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE 21346538430300 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING FEE $ - $ - $ - $ - 213-46538-430400 PROF SRV - LEGAL FEES 7 26 --- 21346538431990 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - - - 100 100 100 0.00% 21346538435100 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 393 - 50 50 50 0.00% 21346538443990 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 28 20 - --- 21346538451010 LAND - - 213-46538-460300 Interfund Loan- Principal 6,656 6,882 6,886 11,731 7,705 7,705 705 0.00% 213-46538-461300 Interfund Loan- Interest 5,948 5,698 5,698 - 4,872 4,872 0.00% 21346538462010 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES - - - 213-46538-465010 TIF LOAN 21346538465110 TIF PAYBACK INSTALLMENTS 21346538465120 LOCAL CONTRIB - TIF PENALT 21346538472030 TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE F - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 13,025 $ 12,600 $ 12,591 $ 11,757 $ 12,727 $ 12,727 $ 12,727 0.00% EDA FUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 2017 TIF 1-39 SMC TIF 1-39 SMC ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE 21346539430300 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING FEE $ 2,146 $ $ $ $ $ $ 21346539430400 PROF SRV - LEGAL FEES 144 21346539431990 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 393 160 1,680 1,680 21346539435100 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION - 20 247 247 21346539436200 PROPERTY INSURANCE - - 213-46539-438100 ELECTRIC - 213-46539-438100 GAS 21346539443990 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 21346539451010 LAND - - - 213-46539-460300 Interfund Loan- Principal 36,124 54,905 46,786 41,311 41,311 41,311 0.00% 213-46539-461300 Interfund Loan- Interest 17,347 - - 12,158 12,158 12,158 0.00% 213-46539-462010 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES - - --- 213-46539-465010 TIF LOAN 213-46539-465110 TIF PAYBACK INSTALLMENTS 213-46539-465120 LOCAL CONTRIB - TIF PENALT 213-46539-472030 TRANSFER TO OTHER FUNDS 213-46539-472030 TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE F - - - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 2,683 $ 53,651 $ 56,832 $ 48,713 $ 53,469 $ 53,469 0.00% EDA FUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 2017 EDA TIF 22-1 TIF 22.1 - FLUTH/CUB FOODS ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET CHANGE 213-46581430300 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING FEE $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 21346581430400 PROF SRV - LEGAL FEES 21346581431990 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 21346581435100 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 21346581436200 PROPERTY INSURANCE 21346581438100 ELECTRIC 21346581438100 GAS 21346581443990 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 21346581451010 LAND 21346581460300 Interfund Loan- Principal 21346581461300 Interfund Loan- Interest 21346581-462010 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 21346581-465010 TIF LOAN 21346581465110 TIF PAYBACK INSTALLMENTS 52,809 50,834 52,610 41,864 41,864 41,864 0.00% 213-46581-465120 LOCAL CONTRIB -TIF PENALT - - - - - - --- 213-46581-472030 TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE F - - - - - - --- TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 52,809 $ 50,834 $ 52,610 $ 41,864 $ 41,864 $ 41,864 0.00% EDA FUND 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 EDA TIF 22-5 TIF 22.5 - AMOCO ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED CHANGE 213-46585-430300 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING FEE $ $ $ $ $ $ - 213-46585-430400 PROF SRV - LEGAL FEES 21346585431990 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 21346585435100 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 21346585436200 PROPERTY INSURANCE 21346585438100 ELECTRIC 21346585438100 GAS 21346585443990 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 21346585451010 LAND 21346585460300 Interfund Loan - Principal 21346585461300 Interfund Loan - Interest 21346585462010 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES - 213-46585-465010 TIF LOAN 21346585465110 TIF PAYBACK INSTALLMENTS 10,504 1 10,112 1 10,761 1 8,820 1 8,819 1 8,819 0.00% 2017 Budget Draft EXPENDITURES: 213-46585-465120 LOCAL CONTRIB - TIF PENALT 21346585472030 TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE F --- TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 10,504 $ 10,112 $ 10,761 $ 8,820 $ 8,819 $ 8,819 0.00% CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING A SPECIAL BENEFIT LEVY BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 to 469.1082, as amended (the "EDA Act"), the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City") previously established the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority (the "Authority"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the EDA Act, the Authority is authorized to exercise all powers and duties of a housing and redevelopment authority under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 (the "HRA Act"); and WHEREAS, Section 469.033, subd. 6, of the HRA Act permits the Authority to levy and collect a special benefit tax of up to .0185 percent of taxable market value in the City, levied upon all taxable real property within the City, WHEREAS, the special benefit tax levy authorized by Section 469.033, subd. 6 of the HRA Act is separate and distinct from the City's levy and is not subject to levy limits; and WHEREAS, the Authority has adopted a budget for fiscal year 2016 that provides for the levy of a special benefits tax in the amount of .0185 percent of taxable market value in the City, to be used for its economic development and redevelopment activities, and has submitted such budget to the City pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.033, Subdivision 6; and WHEREAS, the Authority has adopted a resolution approving the levy of a special benefit tax in the amount of .0185 percent of taxable market value in the City, subject to approval of such special benefit tax by the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "City Council") of the City of Monticello as follows: 1. The City Council of the City hereby accepts the budget submitted by the Authority for the fiscal year 2016. 2. The City Council of the City hereby approves the levy by the Authority of a special benefit tax pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.033, Subdivision 6, in an amount not to exceed $280,000 with respect to taxes payable in calendar year 2016. Approved by the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota this 14th day of September, 2015 466722v1 MNI MN 190-101 Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jennifer Schrieber, City Clerk 466722v MNIMN190-101 EDA Agenda — 07/13/16 12. Consideration of Director's Report (JT) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Activities that warrant a brief comment in the past few weeks include the following: 1. Meeting with Merrill Busch at Historic Rand House regarding concept residential development plan; follow-up review of potential financial assistance sources with him. 2. Attendance at the 2017 Summer EDAM Conference in Duluth resulting in new information and new contacts for prospective leads 3. Completion of a Commercial -Industrial Financial Assistance Program Information listing (attached) 4. Initial start compiling a Housing Financial Assistance Program Information listing 5. Initial start filling out Xcel Energy Preferred Partner Site Certification paperwork 6. Follow up contact with Bill Gorton, Keller Williams, regarding Block 34 and 52 7. Meeting with Peter Bruce, consultant, regarding downtown design and pedestrian traffic research (see attached) 8. Mills Fleet Farm development stage PUD, preliminary and final plat and rezoning to PUD recommended for approval at PC meeting on 7-7-2016. Consideration by Council of preliminary plat and development stage PUD on July 11, 2016 9. Learned of a warehouse -distribution center site search; EDA discussion requested Al. STAFF IMPACT: No unusual staff impact; normal business activity A2. BUDGET IMPACT: No extraordinary budget impact; normal budgeted business costs. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. None requested or required 2. Motion if the EDA feels direction is needed on items 1-9 C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: No recommendation requested; information presented as an update and/or discussion D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Financial Assistance Programs (Commercial -Industrial) B. Walking Connections Analysis Information, Peter Bruce CITY OF Montf6eflo Available Local, State and Regional Financial Assistance Programs A wide range of financial assistance programs exist to help new and growing business. For more information, please contact: Jim Thares, Monticello Economic Development Manager Phone: 763-271-3254 E-mail: jim.thares@ci.monticello.mn.us CITY EDA 1. Tax Increment Financing (TIF): The City of Monticello EDA offers Tax Increment Financing (TIF) assistance to businesses and to development projects for the purpose of creating new jobs, increasing the tax base and eliminating blighted and substandard structures. The assistance requires proof that the development would not otherwise occur without TIF. It can be used for land write downs and/or site improvements as mutually agreed by the EDA and the business/developer. 2. Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund (Revolving Loan Fund): The City of Monticello EDA offers a revolving loan fund to assist industrial business with financing real property acquisition and development or machinery and equipment purchases. The maximum loan amount is not to exceed 50 percent of the "Fund" balance. Typical rates and terms are: Up to two (2) percent below prime rate (based on loan approval date); real estate financing can be amortized up to 30 years with a 5t" year balloon (end of 5t" year) payment. Machinery and equipment can be amortized over a five to seven (5 to 7) year period. Loan amounts may range from $100,000 to $500,000. All loans require appropriate collateral and personal guarantees. 3. Tax Abatement: Tax abatement is a finance tool that the City EDA can use to encourage private development. The eligibility criteria are defined by state statutes. It is generally targeted to new developments that increase the tax base and create jobs. 4. Monticello Small Cities Economic Development Set -Aside Revolving Loan Fund: This EDA administered loan fund can be utilized for business start-ups, expansions and projects featuring job creation and/or retention. Typical rates and terms are: not less than two (2) percent below prime with a minimum interest rate of three (3) percent. Real estate terms can be structured as a maximum of 5 -year maturity amortized up to 30 years with a balloon payment at the end of the 5t" year. Typical loan amounts range from $50,000 to $250,000. Not more than 30 percent of the project's costs can be borrowed from this program. FINACIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS I City of Monticello MN -DEED S. Minnesota Investment Fund (MIF): This is a MN -DEED financing program for industrial manufacturing and technology -related business planning to expand and create jobs. Funds are awarded to local units of government who provide loans to assist expanding businesses. Interest rates are typically negotiated with terms matching the useful life of the asset being financed. Loans require appropriate collateral and personal guarantees. The maximum amount of funding is typically $500,000, although in some cases, more than one governmental entity can apply for funds for the same project thereby increasing the available dollars for a project. 6. Job Creation Fund: This MN -DEED performance based program is available to businesses engaged in manufacturing, warehousing, distribution and technology -related industries. Companies deemed eligible to participate may receive up to $1 million for creating or retaining high -paying jobs and for constructing or renovating facilities or making other real property improvements. REGIONAL 7. Wright County Partnership Revolving Loan Fund: Subordinated gap financing loans are offered to encourage industrial and commercial development. Loan amounts range from $5,000 to $50,000 with interest rates at prime plus 3 percent and a minimum rate of 6 percent. Loan terms shall not exceed that of the primary lender; typically 5 to 15 years. Use of loan proceeds may include real property acquisition or rehabilitation as well as. Purchase of machinery and equipment and working capital. 8. Initiative Foundation: The Initiative Foundation offers several financing programs to businesses with the goal of creating new jobs, strengthening communities and diversifying local economies. The specific programs include: technology based and green businesses as well as value added manufacturing. Loan amounts range between $100,000 and $500,000 per project with the rates and terms also varying based on the program. 9. Central Minnesota Development Company (CMDC): CMDC is a private non-profit certified development company established to provide special financing to small and mid-sized business utilizing the SBA 504 Loan Program. Benefits include lower down -payments, longer terms, below market fixed rates and rapid turnaround. 10. Minnesota Business Finance Corporation (MBFC): MBFC offers fixed rate, low interest SBA 504 loans as well as compete packaging for new and expanding businesses. 2 FINACIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS I City of Monticello FEDERAL 11. USDA Rural Development Loan: The US Department of Agriculture offers several finance programs for both communities and businesses. A popular one is the Business and Industry Loan Guarantee Program involving other lenders. TAX CREDITS/EXEMPTIONS — MN -DEED and MN DEFT OF REVENUE 12. Minnesota Angel Tax Credit Program: This program administered by MN -DEED provides incentives to investors or investment funds that put money into startup and emerging companies focused on high technology or new proprietary technology. 13. Capital Equipment Tax Exemption: Businesses that buy or lease qualifying equipment (machinery and equipment used in manufacturing) for use in Minnesota are eligible for an upfront exemption from Minnesota State and local sales or use taxes. 14. Data Centers: Companies that build data or network operation centers of at least 25,000 sq. ft. and invest $30 million qualify for sales tax exemptions for 20 years on computers and servers, cooling and energy equipment, energy use and software; and they pay no personal property tax. A requirement is the project must be completed in 48 months start to finish. 15. Greater Minnesota Job Expansion Tax Credits: The program provides sales tax exemptions for up to 12 years to eligible existing business located in Greater Minnesota (outside the Twin Cities 7 -County metro area) that meet specified job creation and wage level eligibility requirements. 16. MN Historic Structure Rehabilitation Tax Credits: This program offers a 20 percent state tax credit for qualified historic rehabilitations and parallels the existing federal rehabilitation tax credit. 17. Research and Development Tax Credits: Businesses with qualifying research and development (R&D) expenses in Minnesota can obtain up to 10 percent of qualifying expenses up to $2 million and 2.5 percent for expenses above that level. C Corporations, partnerships and S corporations are eligible to claim the credit through the MN Department of Revenue. Questions? Feel free to Contact: Jim Thares, Monticello Economic Development Manager Phone: 763-271-3254 E-mail: lim.thares@ci.monticello.mn.us FINACIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS I City of Monticello 2015 MPA ANNUAL 0 CONFERENCE ISSUE rut rvlwlffoldllv�St u yes ec 1 CONSULTING SERVICES BY PETER BRUCE SINCE 1991 INCREASING RETAIL FOOT TRAFFIC The number of shoppers corning to a Mainstreet can be increased by some relatively simple physical changes and informational elements. The enclosed map shows traffic volumes and recommended enhancements to stimulate more pedestrian traffic. Implementing the recommendations will encourage existing shoppers/diners to walk a little further on their trip to Mainstreet. Among the tools for "shaping" or directing traffic between destinations are: A sophisticated -looking kiosk in the small town of Buffalo MN. Pedestrian Studies worked for the city to determine optimum location. select hardware, and recommend content. > walking time maps at edges of retail district > wider sidewalks between the Mainstreet and an emerging retail street > store directories and wayfinding info at major decision points for pedestrians > visually enliven (i.e. sidewalk statues) a park frontage in the heart of the retail district Changes such as these can easily contribute to a 20% longer walk, which translates to 20% more pedestrian traffic. Pedestrian Studies consulting can help you design and use traffic -shaping strategies. EVALUATING FESTIVAL IMPACTS Downtown managers and business owners are justifiably curious about what impact downtown festivals have on their viability. Many decisions about festivals are made on the basis of just seeing "a lot of people on the street.' More informed decision-making can be made with the following types of information. PUBLIC SPACE use studies can show what people are doing (eating, sitting on lawn chairs listening to music, moving between destinations, etc.) on the sidewalks and in open spaces during the event. Sitting ............ 23 Dining ............ 56 Walking through park ...... 120 PROJECTS: Pedestrian Studies owner Peter Bruce has provided kiosk design recommendations and project management to a resort town's (Alexandria MN) major retail block, audited kiosk user behavior, and implemented a pedestrian wayfinding system for shoppers at a Super Bowl. The system of 20 signs and kiosks was funded by building owners with placement direction from the the city. • Pedestrian Traffic Count in Downtown for City of Greenville SC 2015 • Walking Connections Audit in Arts District of downtown Long Beach CA 2015 • Studying Bus Stop User Pedestrian Activity at a new Bus Stop Next To Retail Center in downtown Minneapolis See projects list on reverse side WWW.PEDESTRIANSTUDIES.COM ® 612-275-5541 ® IDA MEMBER SINCE 2000 Pedestrian Studmles& Projects 2015 MPA ANNUAL CONFERENCE ISSUE CONSULTING SERVICES BY PETER BRUCE - SINCE 1991 Projects/Studies of Peter Bruce, Pedestrian Studies Consultant Compiled August 2015 > Walking Connections Audit in Arts District of downtown Long Beach CA 2015 Visual and physical elements of the streetscape and building fronts were audited and mapped to analyze opportunities for improving wayfinding and encourage pedestrian shopping/dining, 2015. > Pedestrian Amenities Plan in Alexandria MN - 2013 Client: Douglas County; City of Alexandria; Convention and Tourism Bureau Retail district sidewalk enhancements plan as part of a major street reconstruction project. Locations for public art, wayfinding and shopper information amenities were critiqued and changes recommended to better connect to a regional bike/ped trail and back door large parking lots serving small stores. Business owners were guided in how to take advantage of the foot traffic patterns by changing the position and sizing of their signs. > Pedestrian Traffic Count in Downtown Long Beach CA 2015 Client: Downtown Long Beach Associates Sidewalk traffic volumes were measured in street front retail areas, arts district, by Convention Center and arts district. Summer and winter volumes measured. WWW.PEDESTRIANSTUDIES.COM Store merchandise displays and other street furniture enliven the sidewalk on East 1st Street. Strengths and Weaknesses in the Pedestrian Experience East Village Arts District Surveyed 03 2015 • Report Published 012016 T ■uu••uouu•u•••�■ ■uu■ •uuuuu■ o - E HORELINE R CREMECOURTYARD ■I e ■ • r l DE LE CREPE�� R e 8MINUTE OUTDOORSEATINGt * . _ WALK TO HIGHLY VISIBLE CONVENTION ( 3 I' CENTER I GENET ROOM r.., _! i BA ` A. _ I . Bo%C Conducted by: DOWNTOWN Peter Bruce, Pedestrian Studies Consulting pbruce@pedestrianstudies.com A S S O C I A T E S WHAT IS A WALKING CONNECTIONS ANALYSIS? The WALKING CONNECTIONS ANALYSIS provides a baseline qualitative overview of the pedestrian environment in the EAST VILLAGE ARTS DISTRICT. Recommendations are offered to enhance the identity and improve the pedestrian connectivity within and to the District. The recommendations focus on relatively low-cost streetscape elements that can help strengthen a visitor's perception of the walkability of the District. n GATEWAYS INVITE PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC Gateways let visitors know when they are entering a unique place. Gateway enhancements are recommended on the following streets: Elm Street,1 st Street, Atlantic Avenue and 3rd Street (see key for symbol on map). Enhancing the appearance of gateway intersections can help draw pedestrian traffic from the Convention Center, First Street Transit Gallery, and hotels clustered near 1 st and Atlantic. Gateways are good locations for sidewalk information kiosks promoting nearby retail/services and events, sidewalk public art to support the Arts District image, and landscaping to convey a pleasing atmosphere for lingering. Directional signs with walking times pointing to retail shop clusters will encourage pedestrians to walk beyond the interior of the District. A modest investment in landscaping and walkway identity signage along Elm Street between 3rd Street and 1 st Streets, RECOMMENDATIONS PROJECTS is Landscaping ® Kiosk/Store Directory n Arts District Gateway with Identity Signs Public Art GENERAL Improve Weak Connection 606 Visually Activate and between the Convention Center and the intersection of 1 st and Elm is recommended to encourage pedestrian activity along uninviting parking lots and large buildings. The identity signs coupled with walking time signs and store directories on kiosks will encourage pedestrians to explore the East Village Arts District.