Transportation Advisory Commission Agenda 03-05-2015AGENDA
MONTICELLO TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Thursday, March 5, 2015
7:30 a.m.
Academy Room
Monticello Community Center
1. Call to Order
2. Approval of minutes
a. February 12, 2015 Special Meeting
3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda
4. Fallon Avenue Overpass
a. Evaluation Criteria
b. Alternative Discussion
5. Other project updates
a. TH 25 at CSAH 75
b. Interchange Study
c. TH 25 Corridor Coalition
d. School Blvd Alignment
6. Approve next meeting date and time (Thursday May 14th, 2015 @ 7:30 AM)
7. Adj ournment
DRAFT
MEETING MINUTES
MONTICELLO TRASNPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Special Meeting, Thursday, February 12, 2015 — 7:30 a.m.
Academy Room, Monticello Community Center
Members Present: Luke Dahlheimer, Brad Fyle, Lloyd Hilgart, Don Roberts, Bill Tapper
Members Absent: Rich Harris, Brian Stumpf
Other Attendees: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator; Angela Schumann, Community
Development Director; Steve Grittman, City Planner, Chuck Rickart,
WSB; Bret Weiss, WSB; and property owners Bill Malone, Kris Malone,
Merrill Busch, Duffy Busch
Call to Order.
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 a.m.
2. Approval of minutes.
A. January 8, 2015 Regular Meeting:
BILL TAPPER MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR TAC
MEETING ON JANUARY 8, 2015. MOTION SECONDED BY LUKE
DAHLHEIMER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 5 -0.
B. January 22, 2015 Special Meeting:
LUKE DAHLHEIMER MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL
TAC MEETING ON JANUARY 22, 2015. MOTION SECONDED BY LLOYD
HILGART. MOTION CARRIED, 4 -0; ABSTAINED, BILL TAPPER.
3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda.
It should be noted that Mayor Stumpf was absent from the meeting as he was attending
the Transportation Day at the State Capitol.
4. Fallon Avenue Overpass.
Jeff O'Neill noted that at the last TAC Meeting the design options for the Fallon Avenue
Overpass were reviewed and it was determined that at this meeting the TAC would look
at the criteria for evaluating and rating the different design options. A design option will
not be selected today but rather to identify the main criteria we are looking for when a
design option is recommended to the City Council.
TAC —January 8, 2015 Page 1 of 2
A. Evaluation Criteria: Chuck Rickart distributed the proposed evaluation criteria and
reviewed with the group. Modifications and additions will be incorporated into an
updated listing.
B. Alternative Discussion: Prior to the next meeting staff will meet to rate each
alternative using the updated criteria.
5. Other project updates
A. TH 25 at CSAH 75: Chuck Rickart noted that the project is on schedule.
B. Third Interchange: The consensus of the TAC is to move forward on identifying
future interchanges despite the proposed solar project at the old Silver Springs Golf
Course site on CSAH 39 West.
C. TH 25 Corridor Coalition: At the next meeting the plan is to identify the mission
statement for the coalition, set strategic goals and identify funding programs
supporting ongoing operations of the coalition.
6. Approve next meeting date and time.
Due to a scheduling conflict at city hall, the next Regular TAC Meeting is being
rescheduled from March 12 to March 5, 2015 at 7:30 a.m. in the Academy Room at
Monticello City Hall.
6. Adjournment
Meeting adjourned at 9:15 a.m.
Recorder: CSeth &reen
Administrative Assistant
Approved:
Attest:
Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator
TAC —January 8, 2015 Page 2 of 2
2/26/2015
Fallon Avenue Overpass Evaluation Matrix
Page 1
Screening Criteria
Criteria Explanation
Alt 1
Alt 3A
Alt 5
Ability to provide improved north /south traffic flow with a
Assesses how well the alternative provides movement north and south on Fallon
connection to a future river crossing
Avenue and Washington Avenue between the regional systems.
Ability to provide improved north /south traffic flow, Without
Assesses how well the alternative provides movement north and south on Fallon
0
0/+
o/+
a connection to future river crossing
Avenue to the regional systems.
Ability to provide improved east /west traffic flow
Assesses how well the alternative provides movement east and west on 7th Street
+
0/+
o/+
between the regional systems.
Z
Ability to accommodate existing and future traffic volumes
Assesses how the alternative accommodates existing and future traffic on Fallon
M
c
and operations on Fallon Avenue and 7th Street
Avenue and 7th Street
o
+
+
Assesses how well the alternative complies with local and regional transportation
Consistency with local & regional plans
o
0
0
0
plans.
CL
L
03.
Ability to accommodate other modes
Assesses how well the alternative accommodates pedestrian and bicycle modes.
0
0/+
0/+
r-
.2
Assesses how well the alternative accommodates large vehicles such as trucks and
L
Ability to move larger vehicles (trucks & buses)
buses.
o
+
+
0
CL
Intersection crash potential
Assesses the future potential for vehicle crashes
-
+
+
M
L
Ability to phase proposed improvements
Assesses the ability to phase proposed improvements
-
+
-
Ability to support local circulation and future land use
Assess how well the alternative provides for local circulation and development.
o
+
o/+
Ability to provide future property access
Assesses the potential for future access to adjacent property
o
o
-
Number of parcels impacted
Number of parcels that will have some physical impact as a result of the project.
+
o
(3)
(7)
(8)
Number of total takes
Number of parcels that will have to be completely acquired.
(0)
(0)
(1)
Acres of right of way acquisition
Includes right of way, temporary and permanent easements.
+
o
-
E
(0.75)
(1.5)
(2.5)
0
0
Number of developable parcels
Number of parcels remaining that would be consider developable
-
0
+
w
(2- 45K,74K)
(2- 40K,64K)
(1 -106K)
C
M
Adjacent property owner support
Which alternative has the adjacent property owner support
o
+
-
m
Historic property impacts
Does the alternative impact historic property
+
+
-
E
r-
Assess how well the alternative allows for connections to important community
°
Community connectivity
facilities.
o
0
0
w
Driver
Assesses how well the alternative meets driver expectations in term of intersection
+
m
expectations
configuration.
0/+
0/+
U
V)
Business visibility
Assesses how well the alternative provides visibility to local businesses.
o
o
+
Construction costs
Costs to construct the alternative.
+
($3.6m)
o
($4.8m)
-
($5.0m)
[Right of way costs
Costs of right of way acquisition.
+
o
-
0.20m
0.30m
0.60m
Alt 1
Alt 3A
Alt 5
4
0
9
Code: -
o Neutral -/0
0
0
0
10
9
2
+ Positive o
0
5
5
- Negative °/+
8
8
6
+
Page 1
Date: Printed: 11/15/2011
WSB Filename: K: \01494 -480 \Cad \Layout \Fal1on Avenue - Optlon l.dgn
. ''
'yf J►
\� 4' -
5 . { o„
40 B
F Railroad
of,
! M �
y
- . _ ...
Leo
do
�+d-
• s�7o '}
o, 7 70 J
4 o' - ,� � �.•,. - dr .` .
}1 M
� --
t�vvs ISSI7g00�0�0 Cp �• �� �� � �� a
S?
/500707
S77s0n_ 70
j
H
13306 l / \
04 f
Y.
1
-0
,d / °� ) 0
— r
e�• y - \ 0 100 ft 200 ft
Date: Printed: 111612011
WSB Filename: K: \01494 -480 \Cad \Layout \Fallon Avenue - Optlon 3A.dgn
r 4F
4e
IW
0
f C*
\\ .
SSO
7
+� �
Railroad
a
of,
,# ^ ' • / e"" \fir ,. I',��- �„� 1•,' - la+.t _ - ' -
/ ' - 4• T y� jay � 1 may{. Y T •��!1
., . :0070
AL L
r IM
010 Of,
2 j it
ss// s ��
n
500,0 /0 r y -•,�.►:` - R
rC`
o4 o
' w /55
\ /� -__ • /500 \ • ,, . _
70/0
50070 4
�• 552/500,0/0
/55//50
0001 / =
CIO
ISS
IS
44
o \
• �; - �.� .. 0 100 ft 200 ft
Illy
�,
c Avenue - OptIon 3
f JV
441P .0,
Aw'I
4 to
.(4L
A
it
v
f L 40 40
r
of
0
tss 't I
or
jmL
Ak
0io
f3st
130010JO
lot
4ISS,
A
\.o
io
t7
Of
CA
171
0
Chelsea Road
/120
ZAFr
jr 'I >
<
TIT 0 100 a 200 fi