Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 11-14-2016AGENDA REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, November 14, 2016 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING 5:30 p.m. Academy Room, MCC Discussion: 95th Street Extension and County Road 39 and Gillard Avenue Intersection Mayor: Brian Stumpf Council Members: Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart, Tom Perrault and Glen Posusta 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance B. Consideration of Adding Items to the Agenda C. Citizen Comments D. Public Service Announcements E. Council Liaison Updates • IEDC • Planning Commission • EDA F. Department Updates • Update on Leaf Pick -up (Tom Moores) • City Administrator (O'Neill) 2. Consent Agenda A. Consideration of approving the payment of bills B. Consideration of approving new hires /departures C. Consideration of approving the sale /disposal of surplus city property D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2016- authorizing the modification from a Local Board of Appeal and Equalization Meeting format to an Open Book meeting format starting with the 2017 Assessment E. Consideration of approving the purchase of a new Alitec Cold Planer in the amount of $16,927 for the Public Works Department through the Central Equipment (Internal Service) Fund F. Consideration of approving sale by quit claim deed of parcel 155- 185- 001011 to FRHP Lincolnshire, LLP for $5,880 G. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2016 accepting improvements and authorizing final payment for the School Boulevard/Fallon Avenue and 85th Street Improvements, City Project 14C003 H. Consideration of approving an assessment agreement with Mosbart Properties, LLC for the 2016 Street Reconstruction Project, City Project No. 15C001 2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion 3. Public Hearings 4. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of a request for Conditional Use Permit for vehicle sales and rental in a B -3 (Highway Business) and B -4 (Regional Business) District, a request for Conditional Use Permit for accessory use auto repair in a B -3 District, a request for Preliminary and Final Plat for Camping World 15t Addition, and a request for a zoning map amendment to consolidate the zoning designation on the two subject parcels to either a B -4 or a B -3 District. Applicant: FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC B. Consideration of authorizing funding application for the Federal Surface Transportation Program for the Fallon Avenue Overpass C. Consideration of discussion on direction for Christmas lights outlining the front of the Monticello Community Center on Walnut Street D. Consideration of canvassing the returns and adopting Resolution 2016 -086 declaring the results of the 2016 General Election for the City of Monticello offices 5. Added Items 6. Adjournment AGENDA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORSHOP MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, November 14, 2016 — 5:30 p.m. Academy Room, MCC AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Purpose of Workshop 5:30 p.m. Discussion on 95t' Street Extension and County Road 39 and Gillard Avenue Intersection 3. Adj ournment �XMonticello City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 • Monticello, MN 55362 DRAFT FEASIBILITY Report November 14, 2016 95th Street Extension Street, and Appurtenant Improvements City of Monticello Wright County, Minnesota City Project No. 15CO02 WSB Project No. 1627 -990 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 i f�7 bJlir�neap�alis, �u'IN 55414i '�/ Tel: 17631 541 -4800 - Fax; PD1 541 -1704 tiv daer7�_corn FEASIBILITY REPORT 95th STREET EXTENSION IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF MONTICELLO PROJECT NO. 15CO02 FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA November 14, 2016 Prepared By: WSB & Associates, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 763 -541 -4800 763 - 541 -1700 (Fax) Feasibility Report 95'h Street Extension Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 15C002 WSB Project No. 1627 -990 A WSB Building a legacy —your legacy. November 14, 2016 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Feasibility Report 95th Street Extension Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 15CO02 WSB Project No. 1627 -990 Dear Mayor and City Council Members: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 -541 -4800 Fax: 763 -541 -1700 The following is a Feasibility Report which addresses roadway improvements for the 95th Street Extension Improvement Project in the City of Monticello. The purpose of this study was to further evaluate the feasibility of the extension of 95th Street, between Gillard Avenue and Broadway including: preparing roadway alignment options; completion of a traffic analysis; evaluation of sidewalk/pathway facilities, and; preparation of updated cost estimates. I would be happy to discuss this report with you at your convenience. Please feel free to call me at 763 - 271 -3236 if you have any questions. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. AA" �, 1&-1. Shibani K. Bisson, PE City Engineer Enclosure cc: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator, City of Monticello Wayne Oberg, Finance Director, City of Monticello Charles Rickart, WSB & Associates, Inc. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Charles Rickart, PE Date: November 14, 2016 License No. 26082 Quality Control Review By: Al-- Shibani K. Bisson, PE Date: November 14, 2016 License. No. 41860 Feasibility Report 95`h Street Extension Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 15C002 WSB Project No. 1627 -990 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE SHEET LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL CERTIFICATION SHEET TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................ ..............................1 2. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... ..............................4 2.1 Authorization ....................................................................................... ..............................4 2.2 Program Overview ............................................................................. ............................... 4 2.3 Scope .................................................................................................. ............................... 4 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS ........................................................................ ..............................5 3.1 Water Main ......................................................................................... ............................... 5 3.2 Sanitary Sewer ................................................................................... ............................... 5 3.3 Storm Sewer /Drainage ....................................................................... ............................... 5 3.4 Streets .................................................................................................. ..............................5 3.5 Pedestrian Facilities ........................................................................... ............................... 5 3.6 Land Use ............................................................................................ ............................... 5 4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS .............................................................. ..............................6 4.1 Traffic Analysis ................................................................................... ..............................6 4.2 Proposed Improvements ...................................................................... ..............................7 4.2.1 95th Street Design: ................................................................................................. 7 4.2.2 Pedestrian Improvements: .................................................................................... 8 4.2.3 MnDOT Noise Wall: ............................................................................................ 9 4.2.4 CR 39 at Gillard Avenue Improvements: ............................................................. 9 4.3 Stormwater Treatment ........................................................................ .............................10 4.4 Water Main Improvements ................................................................ .............................11 4.5 Sanitary Sewer Improvements ........................................................... .............................12 4.6 Private Utilities ................................................................................... .............................12 4.7 Permits ............................................................................................... .............................12 4.8 Right -of -Way /Easements ................................................................... .............................12 5. FINANCING .............................................................................................. .............................14 5.1 Opinion of Cost .................................................................................. .............................14 5.2 Funding .............................................................................................. .............................15 6. PROJECT SCHEDULE ............................................................................ .............................16 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................... .............................17 Feasibility Report 95`1' Street Extension Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 15C002 WSB Project No. 1627 -990 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Appendix A Figure 1 — Project Location Figure 2 — Property Ownership Map Figure 3 — Traffic Volume Summary Figure 4 — 95th Street Extension - Option 1 Improvements (Noise Wall Adjacent to I -94) Figure 5 — 95th Street Extension - Option 2 Improvements (Noise Wall Adjacent to Residential Properties) Figure 6 — 95th Street Typical Section Figure 7 — CR 39 at Gillard Avenue Turn Lane Improvements Appendix B Intersection Conflict Warning System Technical Memorandum Appendix C Opinion of Probable Cost Feasibility Report 95`h Street Extension Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 15CO02 WSB Project No. 1627 -990 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 95th Street Extension Improvement Project, City Project No. 15C002, was originally initiated with the I -94 twin bridge replacement project in 2008. At that time the Council did not move forward, with a 3 -2 vote, due various reasons including timing of the project and discussion that the need and benefit was not great enough to proceed at that time. With increased traffic being generated with the full development of Sunset Ponds development and other future development in the area, the anticipated projected traffic volumes along Gillard Avenue again warranted a needs assessment to extend 95th Street to Broadway Street as an alternate route to Gillard Avenue. Recently a fatal crash occurred at the intersection of Gillard Avenue and County Road (CR) 39 which further promoted the City Council to evaluate the traffic operations at this intersection. A project location map can be found in Appendix A. This report investigates: improvements for the 95th Street Extension from west of Gillard Avenue to Broadway; area pedestrian improvements, and; intersection improvements at CR 39 and Gillard Avenue. Input received from the City Council and property owners along Gillard Avenue at a Council workshop on April 25, 2016 has been incorporated into this report. A formal public meeting has yet to be held to obtain input from all adjacent property owners. This Feasibility Report presents a design that seeks to minimize impacts to adjacent residents while providing a safe and efficient connection alternative route between Gillard Avenue and Broadway and/or improvements to CR 39 at Gillard Avenue for both vehicle and pedestrians. The following provides more detail on each of the proposed improvements. 95th Street Extension Two preliminary roadway alignment options were reviewed for extending 95th Street, approximately 2,300 feet, from where it currently ends just west of Gillard Avenue to Broadway Street within the existing MnDOT right of way, taking into consideration construction of a potential future noise wall with the expansion of I -94 to three lanes. After preliminary review of the options with City staff and City Council, it was determined to bring forward Option 1 with the future noise wall adjacent to I -94, for detailed analysis with this Feasibility Report. The proposed roadway concept plan and typical section is shown in Appendix A. The preliminary roadway design is assumed to be 28 foot wide and include two 14 -foot drive lanes and an 8 -foot pedestrian path directly behind the curb, connecting to and relocating the existing River Mill pathway. In addition, the proposed plan includes approximately 20 parking stalls adjacent to the roadway at River Mill Park for access to the sliding hill. Pedestrian Path Improvements It was determined that constructing an 8 foot bituminous path would have minimal impacts versus a 5 foot sidewalk and would be more consistent with the adjacent pedestrian facilities. The proposed pedestrian improvements will include: Feasibility Report 95`h Street Extension Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 15C002 WSB Project No. 1627 -990 Page 1 • Reconstruction / relocation of a portion of the existing 8 foot wide path to behind the proposed roadway, between River Forest Drive to River Mill Park; • Potential construction of a new 8 foot wide path connection from the relocated River Mill trail to Mill Trail Lane NE; • Construction of a new 8 foot wide path from the existing trail at River Mill Park to Broadway Street along the new 95th Street. This pathway will connect to the existing sidewalk on the north side of Broadway Street under the I -94, including needed ADA pedestrian ramps, and; • Construction of a potential 8 foot wide path along the north side of 95th Street from Gillard Avenue to the River Mill trail. Easements would need to be acquired for two properties within the River Forest 2nd Addition development. The proposed pedestrian improvements are shown on the concept layouts and typical section in Appendix A. MnDOT Noise Wall The construction of a noise wall adjacent to the residential properties in the River Mill Addition was evaluated with the proposed 95th Street Extension Improvement project. Based on these preliminary concept plans and discussions with MnDOT the following was determined: • The project would not qualify for MnDOT funding as part of the Stand -Alone Noise Barrier Program; • The option with the noise wall adjacent to the residential properties (Option 2- Figure 5) would have more direct impact to the adjacent properties; • The noise wall adjacent to I -94 (Option 1- Figure 4) will provide better noise reduction at a lower cost; • Should the City decide to construct the noise wall prior to the potential expansion of I -94 to three lanes, MnDOT has indicated that they could not reimburse the City for the cost of the walls because of the federal funding process for the future I -94 project, and; As an interim condition, fencing and screening using landscaping could be provided a buffer between the proposed 95th Street Extension and the adjacent residential areas. Based on these conclusions, Option 1 with the proposed noise wall adjacent to I -94 is recommended as the preferred alternative for a future noise wall. This provides the City and MnDOT with the most flexibility. CR 39 at Gillard Avenue City Council requested that in addition to the proposed 95th Street Extension improvements, alternative improvements be considered at the intersection of CR 39 and Gillard Avenue that would potentially improve safety for traffic on Gillard Avenue and CR 39. Both short term and long term improvements were identified: Feasibility Report 95`h Street Extension Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 15CO02 WSB Project No. 1627 -990 Page 2 • Short Term Improvements: Dynamic Speed Signs; Rural Intersection Conflict Warning System (RICWS); Turn Lane Improvements, and; Enforcement with Speed Trailer. • Long Term Improvements: Roundabout and; Regional Pedestrian Improvements. County staff was in support of the short term improvements. County safety funds may be available for sharing in some of the costs for the short term improvements The total estimated project cost for completing the work defined herein is summarized as follows: 95th Street Extension = $1,040,000 Trail Improvements = $170,000 MnDOT Noise Wall = $650,000 CR 39 at Gillard Avenue Short Term Improvements Dynamic Speed Signs = $10,000 ICWS System = $75,000 Turn Lane Improvements = $125,000 CR 39 at Gillard Avenue Long Term Improvements Roundabout = $750,000 Regional Path Connection = $250,000 The 95th Street Extension costs include 20% contingency and 28% indirect costs. This project is proposed to be funded using tax abatement bonds and capital improvement funds. The project is not proposed to be assessed to benefitting properties. The roadway extension is not on the municipal State Aid system and is not recommended to remove other segments to add it to the system given that other segments have higher traffic volumes generating more State Aid funding. Based on the review and analysis found in this Feasibility Report, any of the proposed projects outlined above are feasible, necessary, and cost - effective from an engineering standpoint. The Council should consider factors such as public input, property impacts on CR 39 and Gillard Avenue, safety, nature and character of Gillard Avenue and 95th Street, among other considerations. Each of these projects is mutually exclusive. Any one of them could be constructed without any of the others. The City Council can choose which project in their opinion would provide the most benefit for the City now and in the future. It is anticipated that any of the above improvements could be constructed in the summer /fall of 2017. Details on the following improvements and costs are provided in this report. • Construction of the 95th Street Extension • Construction of the Turn Lane Improvements at CR 39 and Gillard Avenue • Installation of the Dynamic Speed Signs on CR 39 at Gillard Avenue • Implementation of the ICWS System at CR 39 and Gillard Avenue The estimated total cost for the above improvements is $1,420,000. Feasibility Report 95`h Street Extension Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 15C002 WSB Project No. 1627 -990 Page 3 2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 Authorization On November 23, 2015, the City of Monticello Council initiated and authorized the preparation of a Feasibility Report for the 95th Street Extension Improvement Project. This project is included in the City's Capital Improvement Program and has been designated as City Project No. 15C002. 2.2 Program Overview The extension of 95th Street had been evaluated previously with the I -94 twin bridge replacement project in 2008. At that time the item was tabled do to cost and the determination that the need and benefit was not great enough to proceed at that time. In addition, the 95th Street Extension was identified in the City's 2011 Transportation Plan as a potential capital improvement project in the years 2008 to 2015. Recently a fatal crash occurred at the intersection of Gillard Avenue and County Road (CR) 39 and property owner feedback along Gillard Avenue which promoted the City Council to evaluate the traffic operations at this intersection. In addition, with increased traffic being generated with the full development of Sunset Ponds and other future development, the anticipated projected traffic volumes along Gillard Avenue again warrants a needs assessment to extend 95t Street to Broadway as an alternate route to Gillard Avenue. 2.3 Scope This report includes proposed grading, street improvements, sidewalk/trails, retaining walls and noise wall improvements for the extension of 95th Street from Gillard Avenue to Broadway. In addition the report includes an evaluation of alternative improvements at the CR 39 and Gillard Avenue intersection. The location of the proposed project is shown in Figure I in Appendix A. The Feasibility Report includes the following items: • Completing traffic counts along Gillard Avenue, 95th Street, CR 39 and Broadway • Completion of a traffic analysis with recommendations on the need to extend the roadway and intersection controls • Completion of a topographic survey of the subject area • Preliminary roadway alignment options • Evaluation of sidewalk/pathway facilities along the roadway • Coordination meetings with City staff, Wright County and MnDOT • Estimated costs • Available funding sources • Preliminary project schedule • Determination as to the necessity, feasibility and cost - effectiveness of the proposed improvements • Conduct a public meeting after completion of the feasibility report Feasibility Report 95`h Street Extension Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 15CO02 WSB Project No. 1627 -990 Page 4 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.1 Water Main There are no existing water main systems located within the project area. 3.2 Sanitary Sewer There are no existing sanitary sewer systems located within the project area. 3.3 Storm Sewer/Drainage There are no existing stormwater runoff or treatment facilities such as ponds in the project area. 3.4 Streets The proposed 95th Street Extension will follow a new alignment in MnDOT right -of -way adjacent to I -94. It will connect to the existing 95th Street where it ends in a cul -de -sac west of Gillard Avenue. MnDOT has indicated they are supportive of a roadway connection through their right -of -way. They will need to review and approve the alignment and design. Gillard Avenue is a local City street extending from CR 39 to 95th Street. It is a 24 foot wide street with one lane in each direction and a paved 8 foot wide bituminous path on the west side of the street extending from River Forest Drive to 95th Street. The roadway is unique due to its rural nature, it is an old Township Road, the driveways accessing the street are longer than a typical driveway and the grade is steep towards CR 39. Some of the residents along the corridor have identified the roadway as a safety concern. 3.5 Pedestrian Facilities The existing "River Mill pathway" is located within River Mill Park north of the I -94 right -of- way. The 8 foot wide path extends from River Forest Drive to Mill Run Road. 3.6 Land Use The proposed 95th Street Extension will be located primarily in existing MnDOT right -of -way adjacent to I -94. The properties affected by the proposed improvements are single - family residential units in the River Mill 6th Addition and Sunset Ponds developments. There are also two parcels owned by the City, which includes Outlot A, River Mill 6th Addition where the River Mill trail is located and River Mill Park. Figure 2 in Appendix A show the adjacent parcels. Feasibility Report 95`h Street Extension Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 15CO02 WSB Project No. 1627 -990 Page 5 4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 4.1 Traffic Analysis A traffic analysis was completed documenting the existing traffic conditions alon Gillard Avenue and projecting future traffic conditions with and without the proposed 95t Street extension. Existing Average Daily Traffic (ADT), AM peak hour and PM peak hour volumes were collected the week of January 18, 2016. Turning movement counts were also collected at the intersections of Gillard Avenue and CR 39, Gillard Avenue and River Forest Drive and Gillard Avenue at 95th Street. Based on the existing traffic counts the following was concluded: • Existing (2016) ADT on Gillard Avenue is between 1,620 and 1,850 vehicles per day. Previous traffic counts were conducted in 2001 on Gillard Avenue. Those counts ranged from 1050 to 1200. The primary reason for the increase over the 15 year period is the development of the Sunset Ponds area. • 85% to 90% of the traffic entering or exiting CR 39 at Gillard Avenue has an origin or destination in the City of Monticello (i.e. left turning from Gillard Avenue to CR 39 or right turn from CR 39 to Gillard Avenue). • Traffic on Gillard Avenue is not using River Forest Drive as a cut - through avoiding the CR 39 intersection. • Currently there is not a significant traffic generation impacting Gillard Avenue from the area east on 95th Street or Haug Avenue. In addition to documenting the existing traffic conditions, existing and future projected traffic conditions were determined for the impacted roadways. Future conditions were determined assuming traffic being generated from the area east of Gillard Avenue to Harding Avenue would use 90th Street and Haug Avenue to 95th Street. With these assumptions and assuming that the Sunset Ponds development is fully occupied, it was estimated that an additional 1,200 daily trips would enter the roadway system. Based on this additional traffic the future traffic projections on Gillard Avenue and 95th Street were determined. The results show that with full build out of the area east of Gillard Avenue the following conditions could occur: Without the 95th Street extension, traffic on Gillard Avenue would increase from between 1,620 and 1850 ADT today to between 2,500 and 2,750 ADT, depending on the location along Gillard Avenue. With the 95th Street extension, traffic on 95th Street is estimated to be 900 ADT on opening day of the roadway and 1,500 ADT in the future with a full build out of the area. With the 95th Street extension, traffic on Gillard Avenue would decrease from between 1,620 and 1,850 ADT today to between 750 ADT and 1,000 ADT on opening day of the roadway and to between 900 ADT and 1,100 ADT in the future with full build out of the area, depending on the location along Gillard Avenue. Figure 3 in Appendix A shows the existing traffic volumes and the projected existing and future daily ADT volumes with and without the 95th Street extension. Feasibility Report 95`h Street Extension Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 15C002 WSB Project No. 1627 -990 Page 6 A typical local City street would have traffic volumes up to 1,200 vpd. Traffic volumes higher than 1,200 vpd are typical for collector type streets. Traffic capacity of a two lane roadway is up to 5,000 vpd depending on; the topography, locations of driveways and streets intersecting the roadway, condition of the roadway, rural or urban cross - section and speed of traffic. Considering Gillard Avenue is in need of pavement rehabilitation, the existing traffic volume of 1,620 vpd to 1,850 vpd is approaching a critical level. However, if the roadway was improved (pavement rehabilitation, possible addition of curb and gutter etc.) the critical level could be in the range of 2,000 vpd to 2,500 vpd. Comparable City streets with similar traffic volumes are: • Broadway east of CR 18/39 — 2050 vpd • Fenning Avenue south of School Blvd — 1800 vpd • Fallon Avenue south of Chelsea Rd — 1750 vpd • Street north of 7th Ave — 1450 vpd • Innsbrook Dr south of Chelsea Rd —1850 vpd (estimated- no counts have been taken) 4.2 Proposed Improvements This Feasibility Report presents a design that seeks to minimize impacts to adjacent residents while providing a safe and efficient connection alternative route between Gillard Avenue and Broadway and/or improvements to CR 39 at Gillard Avenue for both vehicle and pedestrians. 4.2.1 95th Street Design: Two preliminary roadway alignment options were developed extending 95th Street, approximately 2,300 feet, from where it currently ends just west of Gillard Avenue, to Broadway within the existing MnDOT right of way, taking into consideration construction of a potential future noise wall with the expansion of I -94 to three lanes. • Option 1 — Noise wall located south of 95th St alignment, adjacent to I -94 • Option 2 — Noise wall located north of 95th Street alignment, adjacent to residential properties Figure 4 and Figure S in Appendix A show both options. After preliminary review of the options with City staff and Council it was determined to bring forward Option 1 with the future noise wall adjacent to I -94 for detailed analysis with this Feasibility Report. The primary standards with respect to the development of the preliminary design plans include size of the roadway needed to accommodate the anticipated traffic, which is projected to be fewer than 2,000 vehicles per day and, the maximum design speed for the roadway of 30 mph. No soil borings were taken as part of this Feasibility Report. If the project is moved forward by the City Council soil borings will be completed with the project final design. The proposed Typical Section for the proposed roadway is shown on Figure 6 in Appendix A. The preliminary roadway design is assumed to be 28 foot wide and include two 14 -foot drive lanes and an 8'pedestrian path directly behind the curb. The roadway section assumes 2" of wear course over 2" of non -wear. In addition, the proposed plan includes approximately 20 parking stalls adjacent to the roadway at River Mill Park. Feasibility Report 95`h Street Extension Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 15C002 WSB Project No. 1627 -990 Page 7 The roadway alignment was shifted south towards I -94 to avoid impacts to the residential properties in the River Mill neighborhood. As a result, a 350 foot long modular block retaining wall with a maximum height up to 4 feet was assumed adjacent to a portion of the roadway. The roadway plan and profile meets the City's design standards and MnDOT design criteria for a 30 mph maximum design speed. The existing profile along the proposed centerline alignment is proposed to follow the natural slope of the land adjacent to I -94. Because of the natural terrain of the surrounding area and the design criteria mentioned above, significant grading will be required to complete this project. A roadway drainage system will be necessary to facilitate storm water for the 95th Street Extension Improvement project. This system will consist of manholes, catch basins, concrete pipe and infiltration basins. Concrete curb and gutters are proposed to direct storm water to drainage inlets based upon the longitudinal slope, design speed, and width of each driving lane. 4.2.2 Pedestrian Improvements: The City's adopted Park and Trail plan includes a policy statement supporting increased connectivity in the pathway and sidewalk system. The proposed 95th Street Extension project provides opportunities to improve the pedestrian connections from the River Mill area to Broadway. This will provide access for the neighborhoods on both sides of Broadway to the parks and trail systems including the Freeway Fields, Meadow Oak Dog Park, River Mill Park etc. The pedestrian improvements reviewed the alternative of constructing a 5 foot sidewalk vs an 8 foot bituminous path. It was determined that constructing a 8 foot bituminous path would have minimal impacts versus a 5 foot sidewalk and would be more consistent with the adjacent pedestrian facilities. The proposed pedestrian improvements will include: • Reconstruction / relocation of a portion of the existing 8 foot wide path to behind the proposed roadway, between River Forest Drive to River Mill Park; • Potential construction of a new 8 foot wide path connection from the relocated River Mill trail to Mill Trail Lane NE; • Construction of a new 8 foot wide path from the existing trail at River Mill Park to Broadway Street along the new 95th Street. This pathway will connect to the existing sidewalk on the north side of Broadway Street under the I -94, including needed ADA pedestrian ramps, and; • Construction of a potential 8 foot wide path along the north side of 95th Street from Gillard Avenue to the River Mill trail. Easements would need to be acquired for two properties within the River Forest 2nd Addition development. The proposed pedestrian improvements are shown on the concept layouts and typical section in Appendix A. Feasibility Report 95`h Street Extension Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 15C002 WSB Project No. 1627 -990 Page 8 4.2.3 MnDOT Noise Wall: The construction of a noise wall adjacent to the residential properties in the River Mill Addition was evaluated with the proposed 95th Street Extension Improvement project. As discussed previously two noise wall options which included alternative alignments for the 95th Street Extension were prepared. Based on these preliminary concept plans and discussions with MnDOT the following was concluded: • MnDOT has developed a program called the Greater MN Stand -Alone Noise Barrier Program to address noise concerns in residential areas that were developed before 1997. Unfortunately the River Mill Addition was platted in 1998 -2001 and therefore will not qualify for this program. • Both alternatives have right of way and /or easement impacts to the adjacent residents. The property impacts were reduced by utilizing a 28 foot wide street compared to the City standard 32 foot wide street. Option 2 with the noise wall adjacent to the residential property would have more impact direct impact to the adjacent properties. • The noise wall adjacent to I -94 (Option 1) will provide better noise reduction at a lower cost than the option adjacent to the residential properties. This is primarily due to the height and location of the proposed walls. • Should the 95th Street Extension be constructed without a noise wall, the construction of the noise wall adjacent to I -94 (Option 1) can be accomplished in the future easier than with the noise wall between the new roadway and the residential properties (Option 2). • Should the City decide to construct the noise wall prior to the expansion of I -94 to three lanes, MnDOT has indicated that they would not reimburse the City for the cost of the wall because of the federal funding process for the future I -94 projects. • As an interim condition, fencing and screening using landscaping could be provided a buffer between the proposed 95th Street Extension and the adjacent residential areas (this is currently not included in any of the project costs). Based on these conclusions Option 1 with the proposed noise wall adjacent to I -94 is recommended as the preferred alternative for a future noise wall. This provides the City and MnDOT with the most flexibility in the future. 4.2.4 CR 39 at Gillard Avenue Improvements: City Council requested that in addition to the proposed 95th Street Extension improvements, alternative improvements be considered at the intersection of CR 39 and Gillard Avenue that would potentially improve safety for traffic on Gillard Avenue and CR 39. City staff met with Wright County to discuss options for safety improvements for this intersection. In addition WSB reviewed alternative improvements options. Below are potential short term and long term solutions that could be implemented: Feasibility Report 95`h Street Extension Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 15CO02 WSB Project No. 1627 -990 Page 9 Short Term Improvements Dynamic Speed Signs: These electronic signs would provide an indication of the speed a vehicle is traveling. It has been documented that these signs have been effective in controlling speed. The estimated cost for two signs would be approximately $10,000. Rural Intersection Conflict Warning System (RICWS): This includes flashing signs indicating vehicle presence at the intersection. The signs would be located along Gillard Avenue and CR 39. These signs could be considered intrusive to the adjacent properties where the signs are located. The estimated cost would be approximately $75,000. See the "Intersection Conflict Warning System" memorandum in Appendix B. Turn Lane Improvements: This would include converting the by -pass lane to a left turn lane and providing additional separation for the right turn lane. The estimated cost would be approximately $125,000. Figure 7 in Appendix A shows a proposed concept plan for this improvement. Enforcement with Speed Trailer: In order to address the speeding concerns on CR 39 specifically at the speed transition from 45 mph to 55 mph, additional enforcement should be provided including use of a speed trailer. Additional enforcement on Gillard Avenue could address local speeding concerns as well. Long Term Improvements Construction of a roundabout at the intersection. This improvement would provide opportunity to make a pedestrian connection across CR 39 to Battle Rapids Park, as well as slow traffic down on CR 39. The roundabout could be viewed as a streetscape feature marking the entrance to the City. The estimated cost of a roundabout is approximately $750,000, not including any right of way costs. With a roundabout and pedestrian connection across CR 39, a pathway connection could be made along the Mississippi River from Battle Rapids Park to the Swan Park, Ellison Park and ultimately to East Bridge Park, providing a regional connection to the City and following the Mississippi River Trail (MRT) route. County staff was in support of the short term improvements. County safety funds may be available for sharing in some of the costs for the short term improvements. CR 39 is identified as a future four lane roadway from Broadway to the east. County staff agreed that a roundabout may be a viable long term option for the transition area from four lanes back to two lanes in the future. 4.3 Stormwater Treatment The current management of stormwater in this section of the City utilizes storm sewer to route and discharge stormwater runoff directly into a system of ponds within the adjacent River Mill developments and eventually to the Mississippi River. . This project as proposed will result in a new net increase of approximately 2.5 acres in impervious surface area. Feasibility Report 95`h Street Extension Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 15CO02 WSB Project No. 1627 -990 Page 10 This project will trigger the threshold to obtain a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Construction General Permit (CGP). This project will require the development of a Stormwater Water Pollution Prevention Program ( SWPPP) that will require the integration of permanent stormwater management for the increase in impervious that is 1 acre or greater. The SWPPP also requires the development of controls to prevent erosion, construction waste management, and hazardous materials management. The City of Monticello has adopted MIDS within their City ordinances. MIDS is triggered when greater than 1 acre of new or reconstructed impervious area is disturbed. MIDS requirements include applying 0.55 inches to the linear impervious areas (i.e. 95th Street Extension), whether reconstructed or newly constructed, and applying 1.1 inches to non - linear newly constructed impervious areas (i.e. parking bays). The 95th Street Extension project disturbs greater than one acre, therefore NPDES requirements are triggered. NPDES requires that 1.0 inch of runoff is retained from any new impervious area. For the 95th Street Extension, this includes the entire 2.5 acres. Therefore, applying 1.0 inch of runoff over this area is the more stringent standard to follow for this project. It's recommended that this volume be treated through infiltration basins at low points along the roadway. MIDS and NPDES both require that infiltration take place within 48 hours. The Wright County Soil Survey data indicates that the soils in this area are hydrologic soil group `B ". Soils in this group typically have infiltration rates from 0.3 in/hr to 0.45 in/hr. The actual infiltration rate will be determined prior to construction and design, through infiltration testing as specified in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual. For the purposes of this report and infiltration rate of 0.45 in/hr was assumed in order to determine the approximate footprint of the infiltration practice. Taking these factors into consideration results in an approximate footprint area for infiltration of 0.12 acres. The stormsewer will discharge to a pretreatment forebay of some kind, or through a grassed swale, ultimately reaching the infiltration areas. Future investigation into groundwater and bedrock depth will need to be completed prior to design and construction of the infiltration area. The infiltration area will have an outlet and emergency overflow designed according to City code such that there will be no flood or erosion impacts. The outlet will discharge runoff during large storm events, downstream to the small pond located west of the intersection of River Mill Drive and Mill Trail Lane. The City will be responsible for long term maintenance of the infiltration basin. The goal will be to provide permanent stormwater management to the maximum extent practical given the right -of -way constraints. The CR 39 /Gillard Avenue intersection improvements includes 0.056 acres of new impervious surface, which does not trigger stormwater management practices. Adjacent ditches would accommodate infiltration prior to discharging into the Mississippi River. 4.4 Water Main Improvements No proposed Water Main Improvements are planned along 95th Street as development adjacent to the roadway is not anticipated. Feasibility Report 95`h Street Extension Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 15CO02 WSB Project No. 1627 -990 Page 11 4.5 Sanitary Sewer Improvements No proposed Sanitary Sewer Improvements are planned along 95th Street as development adjacent to the roadway is not anticipated. 4.6 Private Utilities If the City Council approves the preparation of plans and specifications, staff will complete a Gopher One design locate and meet with the private utility companies to discuss the proposed improvements. 4.7 Permits Permits required as part of the proposed improvements are anticipated as follows: MPCA General Stormwater Permit (NPDES) ..... Grading and Storm Water Wright County ................... ............................... Roadway Right -of -Way for MnDOT .................................... ............................... Roadway Right -of -Way 4.8 Right -of -Way /Easements The proposed 95th Street Extension is anticipated to be constructed primarily in existing MnDOT right -of -way and City of Monticello properties. As mentioned previously, MnDOT has indicated that they are supportive of a roadway connection and dedication of the right -of -way with review and approval of the alignment and design. It is anticipated that a new right -of -way plat would be required with the proposed project. Based on the proposed 95th Street Extension Option 1 concept design there will be three properties that will be impacted by the proposed improvements. Figure 2 in Appendix A and Table 1 below identify the properties impacted by the proposed improvements. TABLE I Right -of -Way Impacts 95th Street Extension Map ID PID Number Type of Acquisition Area (Acres) 10 213000182304 Total Take .0644 11 155126002070 Construction Easement .0400 12 155126002060 Construction Easement .0500 Parcel 10 is approximately 2,800 square feet and located within Monticello Township. This parcel will need to be acquired and annexed into the City with the project. Parcel 10 is a triangular remnant parcel from the River Mill development. It went tax forfeit in 2010 and the State then deeded the property to Finish Line Lounge, Delano, MN in 2014. The City did not receive notice of this since the parcel is located within the Township. Feasibility Report 95`h Street Extension Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 15C002 WSB Project No. 1627 -990 Page 12 Construction easement will be needed from parcels 11 and 12 within the River Forest 2nd Addition development. There is limited space between the I -94 right of way and the extension of 95th Street to avoid these impacts. Construction of a potential 8 foot wide path along the north side of 95th Street from Gillard Avenue to the River Mill trail, will require easements from these two properties as well. Rights of entry from individual property owners may need to be obtained prior to construction commencing for grading and restoration. The potential costs for any easements have not been included with the costs in this feasibility report. Feasibility Report 95`h Street Extension Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 15CO02 WSB Project No. 1627 -990 Page 13 5. FINANCING 5.1 Opinion of Cost A detailed opinion of probable cost for the proposed 95th Street Extension improvements can be found in Appendix C of this report. These opinions of probable cost incorporate anticipated 2017 construction costs and include a 20% construction contingency and 28% indirect costs. The indirect costs include legal, engineering, administrative, and financing items. The estimated costs for the MnDOT Noise Wall and alternative CR 39 at Gillard improvements are based on typical project costs. The pathway improvements along the existing 95' Street are based on typical project costs and do not account for non - standard grading and restoration. The costs will be refined should one of the alternatives be selected by City Council. Summary tables of the proposed project costs for 95th Street Option 1 improvement and alternative improvements for CR 39 and Gillard Avenue are shown below in Table 2 - 4. TABLE 2 Proposed Project Costs 95th Street Extension — Option 1 SCHEDULE TOTAL Schedule A — Roadway Improvements $850,000 Schedule B — Drainage Improvements $190,000 Schedule C — Pathway Improvements $170,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST - 95th Street Extension Option 1 $1,210,000 MnDOT Noise Wall $650,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST — With Noise Wall $1,860,000 TABLE 3 Proposed Project Costs CR 39 at Gillard Avenue Short Term Alternatives SHORT TERM IMPROVEMENT TOTAL Dynamic Speed Signs $10,000 ICWS System $75,000 Turn Lane Improvements $125,000 Feasibility Report 95`h Street Extension Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 15CO02 WSB Project No. 1627 -990 Page 14 TABLE 4 Proposed Project Costs CR 39 at Gillard Avenue Long Term Alternatives LONG TERM IMPROVEMENT TOTAL Roundabout $750,000 Regional Path Connection $250,000 5.2 Funding This project is proposed to be funded using tax abatement bonds and capital improvement funds. The project is not proposed to be assessed to benefitting properties. Feasibility Report 95`h Street Extension Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 15C002 WSB Project No. 1627 -990 Page 15 6. PROJECT SCHEDULE The proposed schedule is as follows: Council Reviews Draft Feasibility Report ............................ .......................November 14, 2016 Neighborhood Meeting .......................................................... ............................... January, 2016 Council Accepts Feasibility Report/ Authorizes right of way and easement acquisition process, Final Design, Plans and Specifications .............. ............................... January 23, 2017 Council Approves Plans and Specifications /Authorizes Ad for Bids .................. April 10, 2017 ReceiveBids ........................................................................... ............................... May 4, 2017 AwardContract ..................................................................... ............................... May 22, 2017 Begin Construction ..................................................................... ............................... June 2017 Construction Complete .................................. ............................... ........................October 2017 Feasibility Report 95`h Street Extension Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 15CO02 WSB Project No. 1627 -990 Page 16 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS City Project No. 15CO02 consists of proposed grading, street improvements, sidewalk/trails, retaining walls and noise wall improvements for the extension of 95th Street from Gillard Avenue to Broadway. In addition the report includes an evaluation of alternative improvements at the CR 39 and Gillard Avenue intersection. Based on the review and analysis found in this Feasibility Report any of the proposed projects outlined in this Feasibility Report are feasible, necessary, and cost - effective from an engineering standpoint. The Council should consider factors such as public input, property impacts on CR 39 and Gillard Avenue, safety, nature and character of Gillard Avenue and 95th Street, among other considerations, before proceeding with any of the improvements. Each of these projects is mutually exclusive. Any one of them could be constructed without any of the others. The City Council can choose which project in their opinion would provide the most benefit for the City now and in the future. From an engineering perspective, the following short term solutions should be considered as outlined in this report: 95th Street Extension The extension of 951 Street will provide an overall benefit to the area by redirecting traffic now and in the future from existing Gillard Avenue. In addition the proposed pedestrian path improvements will provide opportunities for pedestrian to access facilities on either side of I -94 and Broadway. CR 39 at Gillard Avenue Improvements The following improvements should be considered and are listed in order of recommended construction: 1. Construction of the Turn Lane Improvements at CR 39 and Gillard Avenue — This improvement will provide a safety benefit by moving turning vehicles at the intersection out of the through lane of traffic and providing better sight line for vehicles exiting from Gillard Avenue to CR 39 2. Installation of the Dynamic Speed Signs on CR 39 at Gillard Avenue — This improvement will provide a safety benefit by slowing traffic down on CR 39. MnDOT completed a speed study on CR 39 on December 30, 2015 and concluded that the speed limits would remain the same at 45 mph. 3. Implementation of the ICWS System at CR 39 and Gillard Avenue — This improvement will provide a safety benefit by making vehicle on Gillard Avenue and CR 39 aware of other vehicle approaching the intersection. The signs would be located along Gillard Avenue and CR 39. These signs could be considered intrusive to the adjacent properties where the signs are located. The estimated total cost for the above improvements is $1,420,000. It is anticipated that any of the above improvements could be constructed in the summer /fall of 2017. Feasibility Report 95`h Street Extension Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 15CO02 WSB Project No. 1627 -990 Page 17 F.11ww H 0,11] ►:I:1 Figure 1 Project Location Figure 2 Impacted Property Map Figure 3 Traffic Volume Summary Figure 4 95th Street Extension - Option 1 Improvements (Noise Wall Adjacent to I -94) Figure 5 95th Street Extension - Option 2 Improvements (Noise Wall Adjacent to Residential Properties) Figure 6 95th Street Typical Section Figure 7 CR 39 at Gillard Avenue Turn Lane Improvements Feasibility Report 95`4 Street Extension Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 15C002 WSB Project No. 1627 -990 w. • All, Pribjkt Locatiiqin.,« 4 0- TOM 4rr +Q f o -40—A 1% 95th St NE Oak ,Ave .' % Meadow (Ij Jason Ave NE r 74 "T > Y L V " tto A =111.111a Avenue South, Suite 300 CITY OF MONTICELLO Minneapolis, MIN 55416 W www.wsbeng.com 95th STREET EXTENSION FEASIBILITY REPORT November 14, 2016 7635414800 -Fax 763-541-1700 City Project No. 15CO02 Figure 1 INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING CONSTRUCTION WSB Project No.01627-990 Project Location 0 50p' ft 1.0() CITY OF Monficdo K: \01627 -990\ Cad \Exhlblts \FeaslbII lty\flg-01 Project Locatlon.dgn 11/10/2016 CITY OF MONTICELLO CITY OF Ill nnepo AveN South, 416 Suite 3 00 95th STREET EXTENSION FEASIBILITY REPORT " Monti�do WSBMinneapolis, MN 55416 (763) 541-4800 1 wsbeng.com November 14, 2016 City Project No. 15CO02 Figure 2 WRR Pmiact Nn nIs ?7-qqn Property Ownership Map 11/9/2016 Laeand XX Existing AM Peak Volumes (XX) Existing PM Peak Volumes XXX Existing ADT XXX Existing ADT with 95th Street Extension [XXX] Projected ADT without 95th Street Extension "XXX" Projected ADT with 95th Street Extension s 8250 ADT •[11,680 AD X25 "11 r° i V1171 ^ `L +if Ito 1° 0, A i i r 409 APT], (15) 30 -;0 r t W LL QJ 3p5 / Z. Q r - 9th S tr eet NE Qaaa Q •� �+ yip �e r f— 1 ,. tEin 350 ADT �! . r ° (1) 350 ADT J OQ APT] 00 AV � ono 95th Street NE O N O Q ! A T Q 0 N-? 70 4A 0 00 ft 400 ft y "71.111a Avenue South, Suite 300 CITY OF MONTICELLO,�Y,F Minneapolis, MN 55416 W B www.wsbeng.com 95th STREET EXTENSION FEASIBILITY REPORT Monficdo & November 14, 2016 7635414800 -Fax 763541 -1700 City Project No. 15C002 Figure 3 INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING CONSTRUCTION wSB Project No.01627 -990 Traffic Volumes K: \01627 -990\ Cad \Exhlblts \FeaslbII lty \f Ig -03 Traffic Volumes.dgn 11/10/2016 . dr r fyrr; TO'.P 5 . CD � LO ; - 9th S tr eet NE Qaaa Q •� �+ yip �e r f— 1 ,. tEin 350 ADT �! . r ° (1) 350 ADT J OQ APT] 00 AV � ono 95th Street NE O N O Q ! A T Q 0 N-? 70 4A 0 00 ft 400 ft y "71.111a Avenue South, Suite 300 CITY OF MONTICELLO,�Y,F Minneapolis, MN 55416 W B www.wsbeng.com 95th STREET EXTENSION FEASIBILITY REPORT Monficdo & November 14, 2016 7635414800 -Fax 763541 -1700 City Project No. 15C002 Figure 3 INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING CONSTRUCTION wSB Project No.01627 -990 Traffic Volumes K: \01627 -990\ Cad \Exhlblts \FeaslbII lty \f Ig -03 Traffic Volumes.dgn 11/10/2016 ✓V ol > M RUN ROAD x 0 J � �\ MnDOT Right of Way \I ca 4: d , u \� \ 0 Y•i;Yt kN. CONSTRUCTION LIMITS r- p� 3� - ® POTENTIAL TRAIL CONNECTION F�F� } i iMILL TRAIL LANE rn ��_ 1 - U N w RETAINING WALLS -a� �i C Q7- `-j C _� CONSTRUCTION LIMITS WITH WALL NEAR TH94 q. • U U «'e� I r \\ \ �, _� °�� �� EX TRAIL �l — EX. WALK \ / POSSIBLE TRAIL CONNECTION } .�� - \\ \\ ttr� �� \ \� \ \\\ TO GILLARD AVE.- 5 _ 95TH ST � Parcel to be Aqu i red �" Napo ° r \ \\ \ \\ \ \�y� c \ fJ n ��/ 0 M �, \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \✓il IJ 1 a 1 v I .97 POTENTIAL NOISEWALL 0 Al I E> t. 4 7fl0 TON U I ..5 Q / 7"- L7' l .o„ O fl 100 f oo ft�, 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 WSB Minneapolis, sb gxom uO www.wsbeng.com & assocrotes, Inc. November 14, 2016 763 - 5414800 -Fax 763-541 -1700 City Project No. 15C002 INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING CONSTRUCTION WSB Project N0.01627 -990 K:\ 01627- 990\ Cad \Exhibits \Feasibility \fig -04 95th St.dgn CITY OF MONTICELLO 95th STREET EXTENSION FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY OF Figure 4 Monticeflo_ 1 Wall Adjacent to 194 11/10/2016 it9 Gc Nay \ o MILL RUN ROADS < p kj p of / a °K � got Of Way l rs . =DOT Ri . -7 o ` E X TRAIL \ �� Q -, F � �' ��✓ TRAIL OPTION 2 MAX GRADE 8% Oti �� �� 4� S, - 2-s� S \1\ \\ ® CONSTRUCTION LIMITS WITH WALL BEHIND TRAIL. — 2 x l t _ \ I� Proposed Right of Woy L� ° �01 POTENTIAL TRAIL CONNECTIONS } , fi �� I o. a LL TRAIL LANE q 1 Ta II CONSTRUCT LI ION MITS�� WITH WALL BEHIND TRAIL �j 0, P \ -110 EX TRAIL��. , C/ Q EX. WALK %0 0 / S POSSIBLE TRAIL CONNECTION TO GILLARD AVE.– p 1' a ° 5 95TH ST 41 \ J 0-y- 0 LO J, rx ° . �o 0 >� a o 100 A CITY OF MONTICELLO 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 WSB Minneapolis, sb gxom 95th STREET EXTENSION FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY f a7 Monticeflo www.wsbeng.com Figure 5 ar assocrotes, !n November 14, 2016 703 -541 -0800- Fax763- 541 -7700 City Project No. 15C002 INF.STRUCTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING: CONSTRUCTION WSB Project NO.01627 -990 Option 2 Wall Behind Trail K:A 01627- 990ACadAExhibits \Feasibility \fig -05 95.thSt_wall_beh1nd.dgn 11/10/2016 2 ' 8' BIT TRAIL 1:4 SLOP' 2.0% 6" MIN. SLOPE DRESSING POTENTIAL FUTURE NOISE WALL TYPICAL SECTION 95TH STREET EXTENSION OPTION 1 28' 14' CL 14' THRU LANE THRU LANE B618 C &G B618 C &G 2�_0% n 2.0% INSET B INSET A 10' 10' 10' BIT TRAIL BLVD 2.0% INSET B INSET "A" ■ ■m® POTENTIAL I FUTURE v NOISE WALL am 8" t 40' BLVD 4.0% RETAINING WALL 4.0' HT TYPICAL SECTION 95TH STREET EXTENSION OPTION 2 28' 14' (i 14' THRU LANE 1 THRU LANE 4' BLVD I 8618 C &G B618 C &G E 2�_0% 2.0%_ 4�_0% 51 OP 6" MIN. SLOPE DRESSING INSET A INSET "B" SPEC 2360 2.0" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE SPEC 2360 3.0" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (SPWEB240B) MIXTURE (SPWEB240B) SPEC 2360 3.0" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE 6" AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 (MODIFIED) MIXTURE (SPWEB240B) EL 12" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW 6" AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 6" MINIMUM SCARIFY AND COMPACT (SUBGRADE PREP) 6" MINIMUM SCARIFY AND COMPACT (SUBGRADE PREP) FABRC IF DIRECTED BY ENGINEER A -"- CITY OF MONTICELLO 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 _ Minneapolis, MN 55416 WSB www.wsbeng.com 95th STREET EXTENSION FEASIBILITY REPORT mofiff6do November 14, 2016 ss- salaaoo- Fa.7sasal -voo CityPr.je.tNo.150002 Figure 6 INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING CONSTRUCTION WSB Project No.01627 -990 Typical Section K:\01627- 990A CadAExhlbltsAFeasibilityVfig -06 Typical.dgn 11/10/2016 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 WSB Minneapolis, sb gxom uO www.wsbeng.com ar assocrotes, Inc. November 14, 2016 783 -541 -0800 -F-7T -541 -1700 City Project No. 15CO02 INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING CONSTRUCTION WSB PfOjeCt N0.01627 -990 :\ 01627- 990\ Cad \Exhibits \Feasibility \fig -07 Gil lard Avenue.dgn CITY OF MONTICELLO 95th STREET EXTENSION FEASIBILITY REPORT TOY s � 4 dot F _ 1� w _ Aw 3 w _ U 14 W W z ' GJ >1 lA i = a ilill dL AN r. - ++ 7o Al I CI 11` {) 1 Figure 7 = "` Mont* c el lo CR 39 at Gillard Avenue Turnlane Improvements APPENDIX B Intersection Conflict Warning System for CR 39 at Gillard Ave Technical Memo Feasibility Report 95`4 Street Extension Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 15CO02 WSB Project No. 1627 -990 A WSB 701 Xenia Avenue South I Suite 300 1 Minneapolis, MN 55416 1 (763) 541 -4800 Technical Memorandum To: City of Monticello From: Matt Gjersvik, PE, PTOE Date: September 26, 2016 Re: Intersection Conflict Warning System for CSAH 39 & Gillard Avenue 95th Street Extension WSB Project No. 01627 -99 Background The City of Monticello is considering safety improvements for the intersection of CSAH 39 and Gillard Drive as part of the 95th Street Extension project. Over the past 11 years, there have been three fatalities at the intersection, the last occurring in October of 2015. Public perception of the intersection is that it is difficult to select safe gaps when turning from Gillard Avenue and that increasing traffic volumes are degrading safety. The City of Monticello has requested a technical memorandum explaining the benefits of a potential Intersection Conflict Warning System (ICWS). Existing Conditions Currently, the intersection is a thru -stop condition with northbound traffic on Gillard stopping for CSAH 39 traffic. Speed limits for the intersection are as follows: • 30 mph on Gillard Avenue • 45 mph for the west leg of CSAH 39 • 55 mph for the east leg of CSAH 39 The speed limit changes for the east and west legs of the intersection occur in the vicinity of the intersection. This speed differential and associated acceleration /deceleration zone may cause difficulty in gap selection. A site visit was performed on August 12, 2016 to assess the intersection conditions. The following features were noted for consideration: • Drivers approaching the stop condition from the south have poor sight distance for approaching westbound CSAH 39 traffic because of a crest vertical curve and slight horizontal curve. • Right turning movements on eastbound CSAH 39 are facilitated by a 250' turn lane. • Left turning movements on westbound CSAH 39 can be bypassed using a "200' bypass lane. • The static signing on CSAH 39 and Gillard Avenue appears standard for intersection warning signs, speed limit change signs, posted speed limits, stop ahead and stop signs. • The striping through the intersection approaches appears to be in good condition. • There is a single HPS luminaire at the intersection that is offset 65' from the centerline of CSAH 39. Building a legacy — your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com C:\ Users \crickart \Desktop \Monticello ICWS Tech Memo_DRAFT.docx CSAH 39 & Gillard Ave ICWS September 26, 2016 Page 2 The existing conditions are show below in Figure 1. Figure 1: Existing Conditions Traffic volumes on CSAH 39 are 8250 ADT for the west leg, 7100 for the east leg and 1850 for the south leg. Turning movement counts were taken in January of 2016 and show the following conditions: Figure 2: Peak hour AM(PM) turning movements 309 (326) S 6 (14) 2 8 N to ti N Co N N 189 (328) v 23 (113) ' CSAH 39 & Gillard Ave ICWS September 26, 2016 Page 3 Crash History Using the Minnesota Crash Mapping Analysis Tool (MnCMAT), six crashes have been identified in the past ten years including two fatalities since 2013. Four of the six crashes at the intersection have also occurred since 2013. The two fatalities were a head -on and right angle crash. A summary of the crash rates can be found in Table 1 below. Table 1: Crash Rates CSAH 39 & Gillard Avenue *Intersection crash rates are expressed in crashes per million entering vehicles. * *Average for urban through -stop intersections using MnDOT 2013 green sheets. ** *Critical crash rates are expressed in crashes per million entering vehicles with 0.95 confidence level. The calculated crash rate is lower than the average and critical crash rates for similar urban intersections. However, the crash severity rate is higher than average due to the two fatalities. Typical MnDOT ICWS Purpose and Functionality MnDOT has deployed Intersection Conflict Warning Systems (ICWS) at 55 locations throughout the state in an attempt to reduce the number of fatal and severe crashes at selected intersections. The IWCS deployments work by alerting the drivers on all approaches to an intersection of possible conflicting vehicle movements. On the mainline, warning flashers are installed upstream of the intersection to warn drivers of vehicles approaching the stop condition. For the minor legs, drivers are warned through flasher /blankout signs when approaching mainline traffic is too close for the minor approach driver to safely enter the intersection. The flasher /blankout sign will only flash for a set period of time for approaching vehicles and shut off once the vehicle has cleared the intersection. The accepted timing is typically 6.5 seconds based on System Requirements for Intersection Conflict Warning Systems (ICWS) Final Report'. This timing is accomplished with a combination of vehicle detection and traffic signal controller hardware. IWCS deployments can use varying types of vehicle detection such as standard inductive loops, microloops and radar sensors. The detector data is then used by a controller that activates the flashers on the major and minor road approaches for a set amount of time depending on vehicle speed and distance from the intersection. Ultimately, the ICWS will help vehicles on the minor approaches safely judge gaps between approaching vehicles, and warn drivers on the major approaches that traffic may be entering the intersection. Consequently, this warning will give major approach drivers time to slow down or perform an avoidance maneuver if a vehicle enters the intersection unexpectedly. ' Enterprise Transportation Pooled Fund Study TPF -5 (231): System Requirements for Intersection Conflict Warning Systems (ICWS) Final Report, p.9, May 2013, Athey Creek Consultants CSAH 39 & Gillard Ave ICWS September 26, 2016 Page 4 Location Specific Considerations For the intersection of CSAH 39 & Gillard Avenue, installing a system that is identical to MnDOTs typical ICWS may not be the best course of action. The change of speed limits in the intersection's vicinity creates an acceleration zone for eastbound traffic and a deceleration zone for westbound traffic. Current methods of speed detection used with ICWS can gather accurate speed at the exact location of the mainline detection, but the minor approach flasher timing would be incorrect due to vehicle speed changes on the major approach. The traffic volumes during AM and PM peak hours may also present a problem for the ICWS minor approach flashers. If there are enough vehicles passing by the mainline detectors, the minor approach blankout /flasher sign could enter a state of constant flash if the detection is constantly feeding data to the controller. This would render the minor approach sign ineffective and may cause driver frustration. Modification of MnDOTs Typical ICWS for Location Constraints Modifications can be made to MnDOTs typical ICWS deployments that improve the operational effectiveness of the system. The two main issues explained in the previous section can be eliminated with a single design modification. Removing the minor approach blankout /flasher sign and the major approach detection accomplishes two things; eliminating the need to accurately predict minor approach flasher timing with accelerating /decelerating vehicles and eliminating a potential constant flash condition on the minor approach during peak hour traffic conditions. While it may seem counterintuitive that removing the gap- assistance flasher would increase safety at the intersection, studies have shown that the major approach warning flasher has a greater impact on intersection safety2. Warning the higher -speed drivers of impending conflict allows them to either avoid or lessen the severity of a crash, whereas the minor approach vehicles entering the intersection are already at a heightened state of awareness pertaining to the dynamics of the intersection. The major approach flasher system only requires minor approach advanced and stop bar detection to function correctly. While the above configuration may only provide dynamic warning for the mainline approaches, the safety benefits will likely outweigh any improvements in static signing or striping within and surrounding the intersection. Recommendations Based on the intersection crash history, traffic volumes, geometrics and speed conditions, the City of Monticello and Wright County may also want to consider installing an ICWS at the intersection of CSAH 39 and Gillard Avenue to improve safety conditions. A proposed system layout can be found in Figure 3. The system would consist of the following basic components: • Detection for the Gillard Avenue approach — advanced and stop -bar detection • Warning flashers attached to static signing for both the eastbound and westbound CSAH 39 approaches • Controller cabinet and traffic signal controller 2 Safety Evaluation of Intersection Conflict Warning Systems (ICWS), FHWA Publication No. HRT -16 -035 CSAH 39 & Gillard Ave ICWS September 26, 2016 Page 5 • Electrical service • Conduit, wiring and handholes necessary for detector data transmission, flasher power /activation and controller cabinet functionality Along with the hardware necessary for the ICWS, the City /County should also consider developing a maintenance and operations plan for the system. This will provide a guide for proper system operation, emergency and routine maintenance, and definitions of responsibilities for city and county personnel. A system evaluation plan could also be developed to measure the system effectiveness and determine whether or not future ICWS deployments are warranted in Monticello or Wright County. Conversely, if traffic volumes to and from Gillard Avenue at the intersection decrease due to the extension of 95th street, the need for an ICWS should be reevaluated. The system cost for the ICWS described is estimated to be $75,000 for all hardware and installation labor. M • �1 ► 1 MajorjApproachj Ad Warningj Flasher r � - t A%ffl�v MinorjApproachj Stopj Barj Detection - 1111P s Al- ,• ., + y Sign and signal beacon PVC loops — — F & I conduit M Cabinet, controller and service cabinet -e Inplace wood power pole �= o MajorjApproachjgS' Warningj Flasher a of lot i f 1 Source of Power Control lerj Cabin et , + �' Vq n dMW 4 ■ �. �. �+ MinorjApproachj Advancedj Detection FIGURE 3: Potential Intersection Conflict Warning System Layout AM Ott ' ' • ! .440 x+14 • t !V VCITY OF Monticeflo APPENDIX C Opinion of Probable Cost Feasibility Report 95`4 Street Extension Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 15C002 WSB Project No. 1627 -990 ITEM NUMBER I Extension- Schedule -Surface Improvements Project / I I Description I Roadway Monticello, Unit I UNIT PRICE Project Total ESTIMATED QUANTITY ESTIMATED COST 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM $50,000.00 1 $50,000.00 2104.501 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LIN FT $4.00 400.00 $1,600.00 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD $4.00 1100.00 $4,400.00 2104.513 SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT $4.00 150.00 $600.00 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) CU YD $10.00 10000 $100,000.00 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (P) CU YD $10.00 1500 $15,000.00 2105.522 GRANULAR BORROW (CV) (P) CU YD $15.00 3300 $49,500.00 2105.525 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) (P) CU YD $15.00 1200 $18,000.00 2211.503 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 CU YD $22.00 1300 $28,600.00 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON $2.00 450 $900.00 2360.501 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (4, C) TON $62.00 800 $49,600.00 2360.502 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (4, B) TON $58.00 800 $46,400.00 2411.616 MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SQ FT $35.00 1500 $52,500.00 2557.603 IRON FENCE LIN FT $30.00 350 $10,500.00 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 LIN FT $16.00 5500 $88,000.00 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM $7,500.00 1 $7,500.00 2564.531 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SQ FT $35.00 30.0 $1,050.00 2564.602 SIGN PANELS TYPE D EACH $300.00 2.00 $600.00 2564.603 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW - EPDXY LIN FT $1.25 2500.00 $3,125.00 2564.603 4" SOLID LINE WHITE - EPDXY LIN FT $1.00 5000.00 $5,000.00 2573.502 SILT FENCE TYPE MACHINE SLICED LIN FT $2.50 4000 $10,000.00 2575.501 SEEDING ACRE $600.00 4.0 $2,400.00 2575.523 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 1 SQ YD $2.00 2000 $4,000.00 2575.532 FERTILIZER TYPE 2 POUND $1.50 450 $675.00 2575.571 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 3 M GALLONS $400.00 10.0 $4,000.00 SCHEDULE A SUBTOTAL 1 $553,950.00 20% CONTINGENCY $110,790.00 28% INDIRECT $186,127.20 PROJECT TOTAL 1 $850,867.20 K:\ 01627 -99 \Quantity \Preliminary \95th Street Extension Op€raql® Preliminary Engineers_Est - Schedule A 11/9/2016 K:\ 01627 -99 \Quantity \Preliminary\95th Street Extension OptiorPtifedliminary Engineers_Est - Schedule B 11/9/2016 Project. ' Drainage Project Option ITEM NUMBER Description Unit UNIT PRICE Project Total ESTIMATED QUANTITY ESTIMATED COST 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00 2105.511 INFILTRATION BASIN EXCAVATION CU YD $15.00 400 $6,000.00 2101.605 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LUMP SUM $5,000.00 1.00 $5,000.00 2501.602 21" RC PIPE APRON EACH $1,500.00 2.00 $3,000.00 2502.541 6" PERF PVC PIPE DRAIN LIN FT $12.00 200 $2,400.00 2503.541 15" - 21" RC PIPE SEWER LIN FT $35.00 1600 $56,000.00 2503.603 TELEVISE STORM SEWER LIN FT $2.00 1600 $3,200.00 2506..501 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48 -4020 EACH $3,000.00 8 $24,000.00 2506.502 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 1 (2X3) EACH $2,000.00 4 $8,000.00 2511.501 GROUTED RIPRAP CLASS III(W /GEOTEXTILE FABRIC) CU YD $120.00 15 $1,800.00 2511.604 GEOTEXTILE FILTER TYPE IV CU YD $3.00 15 $45.00 2573.530 INLET PROTECTION TYPE C EACH $300.00 11 $3,300.00 STORM SEWER SUBTOTAL $122,745.00 20% CONTINGENCY $24,549.00 28% INDIRECT $41,242.32 SCHEDULE B TOTAL $188,536.32 K:\ 01627 -99 \Quantity \Preliminary\95th Street Extension OptiorPtifedliminary Engineers_Est - Schedule B 11/9/2016 K:\ 01627 -99 \Quantity \Preliminary \95th Street Extension Op€raql® Preliminary Engineers_Est - Schedule C 11/9/2016 I Schedule Surface I I Project / I I 1 n- Optio Pedestrian Path Monticello, Project Total ITEM NUMBER Description Unit UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED QUANTITY ESTIMATED COST 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00 2104.50.5 REMOVE AND REPLACE BIT PATH SQ YD $30.00 1067 $32,000.00 2521.604 3" BITUMINOUS PATH SQ YD $35.00 1778 $62,222.22 2521.602 TRUNCATED DOME PEDESTRIAN RAMP EACH $1,000.00 4.00 $4,000.00 SCHEDULE C SUBTOTAL $108,222.22 20% CONTINGENCY $21,644.44 28% INDIRECT $36,362.67 PROJECT TOTAL $166,229.33 K:\ 01627 -99 \Quantity \Preliminary \95th Street Extension Op€raql® Preliminary Engineers_Est - Schedule C 11/9/2016 City Council Work Session Draft Feasibility Report 95th Street Extension (Gillard Avenue to Broadway) November 14, 2016 (, Monticello Background: • Original evaluation With I -94 Bridge Project in 2008 • Increased Traffic on Gillard Avenue with Sunset Ponds Development (2003 - current) • 951h Street Extension included in City's 2011 Transportation Plan • 2015 Fatal Crash at Gillard Ave and CR 39 • Council Workshop April 25, 2016 authorization to: • Complete Feasibility Report • Complete Design Memo for CR 39 /Gillard Intersection (, Monticello Project Considerations: • Impacts to adjacent properties • Safety of access to /from Gillard Avenue at CR 39 • Existing and future traffic and safety on Gillard Avenue • Rural character, driveways, slopes, etc. of Gillard Ave • Timing of 95th Street extension (, Monticello AMM, Project Scope: • Complete /Update Traffic Counts and Analysis • Preliminary Design for Street, Sidewalk /Trail, Retaining Wall and Noise Wall for 95th St Extension • Preliminary Alternatives for Gillard Ave at CR 39 • Estimated Cost • Preliminary Schedule M It T 40 atom V. 4 0 ■ i r rl Jiv %a -tr6lw Lpc", dj% IT A Asp 05th St NE Meaduw 4.k LU z Jason Ave NE mpj cc An I& (:Monticello Traffic Analysis Year 2001 Traffic On Gillard Ave: 1,050 to 1,200 ADT Year 2016 Traffic on Gillard Ave: 1,620 to 1,850 ADT With the 95th Street Extension: Opening Day: • Gillard Avenue: 750 to 1,000 ADT • 95th Street: 1000 ADT Future Full Build of the Area: • Gillard Avenue: 900 to 1,100 ADT • 95th Street: 1,500 ADT Without the 95th Street Extension: • Gillard Avenue: 2,500 to 2,750 ADT (with future build out of area) (, Monticello Traffic Analyis (cont): • Typical local City Street 1,200 ADT or less with a capacity of up to 5,000 ADT. • Existing 1,850 on Gillard is approaching a critical level. With rehabilitation, critical level could be improved to 2,000 to 2,500 ADT. o Pavement replacement included in 2017 Street Improvement project • Comparable City Streets: • Broadway east of CR 18/39 = 2,050 vpd • Fenning Avenue south of School Blvd =1,800 vpd • Fallon Avenue south of Chelsea Rd =1,750 vpd • Cedar Street north of 7th Ave =1,450 vpd • Innsbrook Drive south of Chelsea Rd =1,850 vpd (estimate) 0 • (, Monticello Proposed Improvements - 95th Street: • Potential Noise Wall Location two options: • Option 1- Noise Wall adjacent to I -94 • Option 2 - Noise Wall adjacent to Residential Property • Option 1 Recommended • Noise Wall considered with expansion of I -94 to 3 lanes. • MnDOT will not reimburse City if city builds noise wall due • • 0 1 1, 0 Monti ce Preliminary Roadway Alignments - Option 1 0 1 1, 0 Monti ce Preliminary Roadway Alignments - Option 2 (:Monticello Proposed Improvements - 95th Street: • Speed Limit 30 mph • 28 foot Street Section to limit impacts o Existing is 36 -feet wide • 20 Parking Stalls adjacent to River Mill Park • Shifted Roadway towards I -94 to limit property impacts • 4 foot High Modular Block Retaining Wall (:Monticello Proposed Improvements - 95th Street: • Pedestrian Path Improvements o Relocation of River Mill pathway adjacent to 95th St • Potential Construction of a new path connection from River Mill trail to Mill Trail Lane NE • Pathway extension from River Mill path to existing Broadway Street sidewalk located under 1 -94 o Potential 8 foot wide path along the north side of 95th Street from Gillard Avenue to the River Mill trail. Easements would need to be acquired for two properties within the River Forest 2nd Addition development. (not included in costs) (:Monticello CR 39 /Gillard Ave Intersection • Safety improvements to CR39 /Gillard Ave intersection should be considered with or without 95th Street Short Term Solution • Enforcement with Speed Trailer • Dynamic Speed Signs • Rural Intersection Conflict Warning System • Separated EB CR 39 right turn lane at Gillard Ave and WB CR 39 left turn lane at Gillard Ave • Long Term Solution • Roundabout at Gillard and CR 39 • Regional Path Connection (, Monticello Monticello ftm a] td V�v al boaeDm PVC bEvs C'7T " f7F e F & I wroduil M i o CatMmt. cantrOlor and service cablfwl — 3 mptAcR wDod pawyr p ©4e FIGURE 3. Potential Intersection Conflict Warning Systems layout (, Monticello M06A jp Flow Ilk- � � W _ � u yr s Q won, 4b lu# Y i • (:Monticello Right of Way /Easement Impacts: • Construction in MnDOT right -of -way and City property • Three Properties Impacted Map ID PID Number Type of Acquisition Area (Acres) 10 213000182304 Total Take .0644 11 155126002070 Construction Easement .0400 12 155126002060 Construction Easement F70500 Will need pathway easement if extend pathway adjacent to Parcels 11 and 12. Monticello R k,� f (:Monticello 951hStreet Improvements Estimated Costs: SCHEDULE TOTAL Schedule A — Roadway Improvements $85000 Schedule B — Drainage Improvements $19000 Schedule C — Pathway Improvements $17000 TOTAL PROJECT COST - 95th Street Extension Option 1 $19210,000 MnDOT Noise Wall $65000 TOTAL PROJECT COST — With Noise Wall $19860,000 Pathway cost does not include 95th Street pathway between Gillard and River Mill Pathway. Will be included in final report. (, Monticello CR 39 /Gillard Avenue Estimated Costs: SHORT TERM IMPROVEMENT TOTAL Dynamic Speed Signs $10,000 ICWS System $75,000 Turn Lane Improvements $125,000 LONG TERM IMPROVEMENT TOTAL Roundabout $7501000 Regional Path Connection $2501000 (, Monticello Funding: • Tax Abatement Bonds • Possible County participation for CR 39 at Gillard Avenue improvements • No Assessments (, Monticello Schedule: • Council Review Draft Feasibility Report • Neighborhood Meeting November 14, 2016 • Council Accepts Feas Report /Authorize ROW/ easement acquisition, Final Design, Plans and Spec • Council Approves Plans /Authorize AFB • Receive Bids • Award Contract • Begin Construction J • Complete Construction M January, 2017 January 23, 2017 April 10, 2017 May 4, 2017 May 22, 2017 June, 2017 October, 2017 0 (, Monticello ok a Conclusions: • Option 1 (with Noise Wall adjacent to I -94) should be considered the selected alignment for the 95th Street Extension to reduce traffic on Gillard Avenue. • Noise wall can be implemented with or without 95th Street Extension. • Improvements to CR 39 and Gillard Avenue will provide safety benefits for traffic on Gillard Avenue. (:Monticello Conclusions (cont): • Council should also consider: • Public Input • Property Impacts on CR 39, Gillard Avenue and existing 95th Street • Safety • Nature and Character of Gillard Avenue and 951h Street • Each identified project is mutually exclusive and can be constructed without any of the others. • (, Monticello -.Mid Solutions: • 95th Street Extension: • Option 1 alignment- w/ future noise wall located adjacent to I -94 • Pathway Improvements adjacent to 95th Street from Gillard Avenue to Broadway Street • CR 39 at Gillard Avenue: • Turn lane Improvements • Dynamic Speed Signs • Implementation of ICWS System Total Estimated Cost $1,420,000 Traffic Volumes M Legend AX ExatIrqSAM Hoak VaI es I EidOng ADT Cpdj4ing ADI wUh k5% Mze t Fghr puq Ixm PrQwwd Am mfltkarx 95th sU..s En zwm X- Prr4--lrd A470 .1th 41".. V-- cer. 82SO AOT I tlkw I ADTJ I ILI] 1 -'4 60 p P 14 goo; AM k J*U Alai j *ft i 'fr A if el "r- -v AAPI 4w (, Monticello Traffic Analysis: • Existing (YR 2016) ADT on Gillard Avenue: 1,620 to 1,850 vehicles per day. • Historic counts conducted in 2001: 1050 to 1200 vehicles per day on Gillard Avenue. • 85% to 90% of the traffic entering or exiting CR 39 at Gillard Avenue has an origin or destination in the City of Monticello (i.e. left turning from Gillard Avenue to CR 39 or right turn from CR 39 to Gillard Avenue). • Traffic on Gillard Avenue is not using River Forest Drive as a cut - through avoiding the CR 39 intersection. • Currently there is not a significant traffic generation impacting Gillard Avenue from the area west on 95th Street or Hau g Avenue. • It is not likely that future long term developpg ment east of Haug Avenue will utilize the 95th Street extension when travelin to and from Monticello. CR 39 will be likely be primary route. City Council Agenda: 11/14/16 2A. Consideration of approving payment of bills (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City staff submits the attached bill registers and purchasing card registers for approval by Council. The bill registers contain all invoices processed and the purchasing card registers contain all card purchases made since the last Council meeting. Subject to MN Statutes, most invoices require Council approval prior to releasing checks for payment. The day following Council approval, payments will be released unless directed otherwise. A credit purchasing agreement and policy was approved by Council initially and card purchases must comply with the policy. If Council has no questions or comments on the bill and purchase card registers, these can be approved with the consent agenda. If requested, this item can be removed from consent and discussed prior to making a motion for approval. Al. Budget Impact: None A2. Staff Workload Impact: No additional work required B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $1,524,560.86. 2. Motion to approve the registers with changes directed by Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 or #2, per direction of Council. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Bill registers and Purchase Card registers Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Debbie.Davidson Printed: 11/01/2016 - 12:13PM Batch: 00215.10.2016 - 215.10.2016 Xcel/CPE Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Vendor: 4263 CAYAN Check Sequence: 1 218986 (12,380) Transactions; (3) Genius service fee 956.45 10/31/2016 60949754- 424100 Check Total: 956.45 Vendor: 1102 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Check Sequence: 2 10/31/2016 5843395 -5 15.85 10/31/2016 217 - 41990 - 438100 10/31/2016 5863599 -6 18.89 10/31/2016 101 - 42700 - 438100 10/31/2016 5806932 -5 15.85 10/31/2016 101 - 45201- 438100 10/31/2016 5821009 -5 31.66 10/31/2016 101 - 42200- 438100 10/31/2016 5864452 -7 59.20 10/31/2016 101 - 45501- 438100 10/31/2016 5788570 -9 24.34 10/31/2016 609 - 49754- 438100 10/31/2016 5804618 -6 15.85 10/31/2016 101 - 45201- 438100 10/31/2016 5768542 -2 78.87 10/31/2016 101 - 41940- 438100 10/31/2016 5768542 -2 1,823.83 10/31/2016 226 - 45122- 438100 10/31/2016 5768542 -2 29.58 10/31/2016 101 - 45175- 438100 10/31/2016 5768542 -2 39.43 10/31/2016 101 - 42800 - 438100 10/31/2016 5828859 -8 15.85 10/31/2016 101 - 41940 - 438100 10/31/2016 8235331 -9 16.94 10/31/2016 101 - 41941 - 438100 10/31/2016 8235333 -5 16.94 10/31/2016 101 - 41941 - 438100 10/31/2016 8000015233 -2 1,088.01 10/31/2016 602 - 49480- 438100 10/31/2016 5799425 59.41 10/31/2016 101 - 43127 - 438100 10/31/2016 5799427 15.85 10/31/2016 101 - 43127 - 438100 10/31/2016 5820786 15.85 10/31/2016 101 - 43127 - 438100 10/31/2016 5837384 58.85 10/31/2016 101 - 43127 - 438100 Check Total: 3,441.05 Vendor: 2811 US BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM Check Sequence: 3 10/31/2016 difference in US Bank batch total 10 -15 -2016 0.01 10/31/2016 101- 41520- 443990 Check Total: 0.01 Vendor: 2405 WELLS FARGO - Monthly Charges /Returns Check Sequence: 4 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/01/2016 - 12:13 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number October 2016 Weels Fargo account interest earnings - 1,543.03 10/31/2016 101 - 00000 - 362110 October 2016 Wells Fargo account service charge 2,388.34 10/31/2016 101 - 41520- 443980 October 2016 MCC cc Fees (WF- Front Desk) 980.65 10/31/2016 226 - 45122- 443980 October 2016 MCC cc Fees (WF- On -line) 16.45 10/31/2016 226 - 45122- 443980 October 2016 MCC cc Fees (iAccess- Fmrs Mkt) 80.53 10/31/2016 226 - 45122- 443980 October 2016 Liquor Store cc Fees (Cayan) 26.25 10/31/2016 609 - 49754- 443980 October 2016 Liquor Store cc Fees (WF) 9.00 10/31/2016 609 - 49754- 443980 October 2016 Liquor Store cc Fees (WF) 5,462.57 10/31/2016 609 - 49754- 443980 October 2016 City Hall cc Fees (WF) 204.10 10/31/2016 101 - 41520- 443980 October 2016 City Hall cc Fees (TCF - final fees) 1.54 10/31/2016 101 - 41520- 443980 October 2016 Utility cc Fees (Bluefin) 205.96 10/31/2016 601 - 49440 - 443980 October 2016 Utility cc Fees (Bluefin) 205.95 10/31/2016 602 - 49490 - 443980 October 2016 FiberNet cc Fees (WF) 917.36 10/31/2016 656- 49870 - 443980 October 2016 Bank/CC Returns 10/13/16 122.00 10/31/2016 226 - 00000 - 115031 October 2016 Bank/CC Returns 10/13/16 29.50 10/31/2016 226- 00000 - 115031 October 2016 Bank/CC Returns 10/14/16 44.00 10/31/2016 226 - 00000 - 115031 October 2016 Bank/CC Returns 10/14/16 90.00 10/31/2016 226 - 00000 - 115031 October 2016 Bank/CC Returns 10/14/16 100.00 10/31/2016 226 - 00000 - 115031 10/31/2016 Check Total: 9,341.17 10/31/2016 Vendor: 1585 XCEL ENERGY Check Sequence: 5 10/31/2016 51- 6572904 -0 WWTP 11,529.69 10/31/2016 602- 49480 - 438100 10/31/2016 51- 605905 -0 6,290.26 10/31/2016 601 - 49440- 438100 10/31/2016 51- 6505906 -1 paid 10 /1 1,820.77 10/31/2016 602 - 49490 - 438100 10/31/2016 51- 0395766 -0 - Pumphouse 405 Ramsey 3,807.19 10/31/2016 601 - 49440 - 438100 10/31/2016 51- 6505907 -2 - 8/2- 8/31/16 83.23 10/31/2016 101 - 43120 - 438100 10/31/2016 51- 6505907 -2 - (3) auto protective light- 8/28 -9/ 46.66 10/31/2016 101 - 43120 - 438100 10/31/2016 ZZZNEP- IMPLEM - 51- 6505908 -3 18.62 10/31/2016 101 - 42500- 438100 10/31/2016 51- 6505910 -7 - Hi -Way Liquor 8/2- 8/31/16 2,350.30 10/31/2016 609 - 49754- 438100 10/31/2016 51- 6505911 -8 - City Hall 2,022.81 10/31/2016 101 - 41940 - 438100 10/31/2016 51- 6505911 -8 -MCC 9,162.16 10/31/2016 226- 45122- 438100 10/31/2016 51- 6505911 -8 - Senior Center 475.96 10/31/2016 101 - 45175- 438100 10/31/2016 51- 6505911 -8 -National Guard 237.98 10/31/2016 101 - 42800 - 438100 10/31/2016 51- 6505914 -1 Shop /Garage 7/4- 8/2/16 1,355.99 10/31/2016 101 - 43127 - 438100 10/31/2016 51- 6505916 -3 Street Lights- 8/2- 8/31/16 12,744.71 10/31/2016 101 - 43160- 438100 10/31/2016 51- 9069641 -8 FNM Headend Bldg 8/2- 8/31/16 1,887.44 10/31/2016 656- 49877 - 438100 10/31/2016 51- 9391437 -3 - 6th St Bldg 8/2 -31/16 222.40 10/31/2016 101 - 41941 - 438100 10/31/2016 51- 4271112 -2 - Library 8/31- 10/1/16 1,089.89 10/31/2016 101 - 45501- 438100 10/31/2016 51- 6505915 -2 Parks 623.62 10/31/2016 101 - 45201- 438100 10/31/2016 51- 6505915 -2 - Water skating rink 28.38 10/31/2016 601 - 49440 - 438100 10/31/2016 51- 6505915 -2 - Ballfields 59.24 10/31/2016 101 - 45203- 438100 10/31/2016 51- 6505915 -2 - Softball 755.77 10/31/2016 101 - 45203- 438100 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/01/2016 - 12:13 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Total: 56,613.07 Total for Check Run: 70,351.75 Total of Number of Checks: The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed < Date: 11/14/2016 Approved by AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/01/2016 - 12:13 PM) Mai Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Debbie.Davidson Printed: 11/03/2016 - 10:39AM Batch: 00202.11.2016 - 202.11.2016 Liquor Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Vendor: 3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Check Sequence: 1 3136477 resale - beer 229.70 11/03/2016 60949750- 425200 Check Total: 229.70 Vendor: 1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION Check Sequence: 2 55916700 resale- wine 377.52 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 55916700 resale - liquor 370.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 55916700 freight 14.30 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 56047900 resale - wine 254.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 56047900 resale - liquor 485.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 94792800 resale- mix 31.64 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 Check Total: 1,532.46 Vendor: 1067 BERNICK'S Check Sequence: 3 188299 resale - soda pop 45.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 188299 resale -juice 32.80 11/03/2016 609- 49750- 425500 188300 resale - beer 804.30 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 188301 resale - beer credit -23.68 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 191008 resale - soda pop 40.65 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 191008 resale -juice 32.50 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425500 191009 resale - beer 1,482.00 11/03/2016 609- 49750- 425200 193919 resale - soda pop 103.20 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 193919 resale -juice 16.40 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425500 193920 resale - beer 1,635.25 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 193921 resale - beer credit - 167.60 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 Check Total: 4,000.82 Vendor: 4328 BREAKTFIRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIF Check Sequence: 4 1080543689 resale - liquor 844.04 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 1080543689 resale- wine 498.46 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 1080543689 freight 24.50 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/03/2016 - 10:39 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1080547487 resale - liquor 3,585.06 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 1080547487 resale- wine 770.48 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 1080547487 freight 58.58 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 Check Total: 5,781.12 Vendor: 4089 CARLSON & LYTER DISTRIBUTING, INC Check Sequence: 5 497 -4 resale - beer 272.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 Check Total: 272.00 Vendor: 1117 COALITION OF UTILITY CITIES Check Sequence: 6 0028632 Coalition of Utility Cities Dues 2016/2017 27,055.00 11/03/2016 101 - 41310 - 443300 Check Total: 27,055.00 Vendor: 1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 7 1218377 resale - beer 711.75 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 1218392 resale - beer 189.20 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 12222061 resale - beer 11,364.27 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 12222061 resale - beer n/a 253.55 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 133742 resale - beer 24,792.20 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 133742 resale - beer n/a 25.10 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 133821 resale - beer 195.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 133842 resale - beer 48.60 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 133919 resale - beer 456.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 1340830 resale - beer 21,481.05 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 134266 resale - beer credit -63.80 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 134267 resale - beer 464.80 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 134365 resale - beer 96.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 134454 resale - beer 2,102.45 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 134644 resale - beer 122.60 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 134644 resale - beer n/a 132.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 134783 resale - beer 1,278.65 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 Check Total: 63,649.42 Vendor: 1680 EPIC PRODUCTS INC Check Sequence: 8 503217 resale - cork cages; gift bags; etc 613.80 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 503217 freight 81.15 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 Check Total: 694.95 Vendor: 1206 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC Check Sequence: 9 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/03/2016 - 10:39 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 11457 resale- wine 400.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 11733 resale - wine 1,211.98 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 11733 freight 20.25 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 Check Total: 1,632.23 Vendor: 4218 HOHENSTEINS, INC Check Sequence: 10 000005 resale - beer 522.50 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 Check Total: 522.50 Vendor: 1259 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING Check Sequence: 11 2585534 resale -beer 2,394.95 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 2585569 freight 3.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2585569 resale -beer 393.05 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 2585569 resale -beer n/a 49.20 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 Check Total: 2,840.20 Vendor: 1263 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Check Sequence: 12 5564130 resale - liquor 4,771.99 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 5564130 freight 67.19 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5564131 freight 139.68 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5564131 resale - wine 5,597.65 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 5564131 resale- wine n/a 41.35 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 5564132 resale - beer 109.95 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 5565508 resale - liquor 2,248.41 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 5565508 freight 22.08 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5565509 freight 26.64 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5565509 resale - wine 1,530.66 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 5568068 freight 2.88 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5568068 resale - liquor 336.75 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 5568069 resale- wine 176.60 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 5568069 freight 5.76 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5568070 resale - liquor 2,732.40 11/03/2016 609- 49750- 425100 5568070 freight 34.56 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5568071 freight 41.76 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5568071 resale - wine 1,392.25 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 5569536 freight 64.80 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5569536 resale - liquor 4,339.43 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 5569537 resale - wine 4,229.48 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 5569537 freight 131.03 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5570946 freight 93.48 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/03/2016 - 10:39 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 5570946 resale - liquor 6,748.86 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 5570947 resale- wine 1,905.85 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 5570947 resale - wine n/a 39.95 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 5570947 freight 48.24 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5573754 resale - beer 120.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 5575328 freight 57.60 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5575328 resale - liquor 5,422.18 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 5575329 resale - wine 4,083.95 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 5575329 freight 129.61 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5575330 resale - beer 87.96 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 5576809 resale - wine 1,679.61 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 5576809 resale - wine n/a 192.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 5576809 freight 37.54 11/03/2016 609- 49750- 433300 596421 resale - wine credit inv #5233828 -52.60 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 596421 freight credit inv #5233828 -13.15 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 596971 resale - wine credit -13.33 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 596972 resale- wine credit inv #5547209 -14.67 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 596973 resale- wine credit inv #5553178 -3.76 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 596974 resale - wine credit inv #5564131 - 279.60 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 596974 freight credit inv #5564131 -7.20 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 597166 resale - wine credit inv #5565509 -96.50 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 597166 freight credit inv #5565509 -1.44 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 597384 freight credit inv #5557194 -1.44 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 597384 resale wine credit inv #5557194 -52.60 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 597912 resale - wine credit inv #5564131 -37.23 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 598142 resale - liquor credit inv #5562635 - 260.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 598143 resale - wine credit inv #5564131 -13.15 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 598144 resale - wine credit inv #5569537 -13.15 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 Check Total: 47,830.31 Vendor: 1273 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO Check Sequence: 13 8566216 freight 10.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 8566216 resale- wine 634.48 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 8566359 resale -wine 225.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 8566359 freight 2.25 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 Check Total: 871.73 Vendor: 1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO Check Sequence: 14 2058191 resale - liquor correction inv. 2049842 29.90 11/03/2016 609- 49750- 425100 2058555 resale- wine 414.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 2058555 freight 11.52 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/03/2016 - 10:39 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 2059561 freight 41.76 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2059561 resale - liquor 3,357.06 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 2059562 resale - liquor 2,708.90 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 2059562 resale - liquor 66.25 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 2061349 resale - liquor 665.50 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 2061349 freight 8.64 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2061350 freight 11.52 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2061350 resale - wine 747.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 2062303 resale - liquor 3,135.08 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 2062303 freight 37.58 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2062304 freight 100.80 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2062304 resale - wine 2,719.50 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 206285 freight 48.24 11/03/2016 609- 49750- 433300 206285 resale- wine 2,438.94 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 206285 resale- wine n/a 106.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 2063284 resale - liquor 5,148.93 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 2063284 freight 64.73 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2066101 resale - liquor 3,082.60 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 2066101 freight 31.97 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2067125 freight 12.96 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2067125 resale - liquor 1,172.71 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 248473 resale - liquor credit inv. 237233 -3.10 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 248474 resale - liquor credit inv. #2050886 -2.20 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 249370 resale - liquor credit inv #2062303 - 141.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 249370 resale - liquor credit inv #2062303 -1.44 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 249486 resale - liquor credit inv #2026232 -6.92 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 Check Total: 26,007.43 Vendor: 3309 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS, Check Sequence: 15 1460875 resale - liquor 156.09 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 1460875 freight 1.40 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 1466039 resale - liquor 900.88 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 1466039 freight 8.98 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 1466040 freight 40.83 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 1466040 resale - wine 2,183.65 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 1468629 freight 13.18 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 1468629 resale - liquor 916.08 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 1468630 resale - mix 38.87 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 1468630 freight 1.40 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 1468631 freight 60.20 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 1468631 resale- wine 3,891.38 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 credits 10/16 freight- credits -22.60 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/03/2016 - 10:39 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number credits 10/16 resale - wine credits - 684.80 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 credits 10/16 resale - liquor credits - 1,101.73 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 Check Total: 6,403.81 Vendor: 1522 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Check Sequence: 16 1155571 resale - beer 7,192.91 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 1158671 resale - beer 8,073.20 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 1159038 resale - beer 16,010.34 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 1162169 resale - beer 397.95 11/03/2016 609- 49750- 425200 1162169 resale- wine 100.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 1162170 resale - n/a beer 76.90 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 1162519 resale - beer 21,670.80 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 1162520 resale - beer 2,086.00 11/03/2016 60949750- 425200 1165635 resale - beer credit - 2,316.08 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 156 -28 resale - beer 474.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 Check Total: 53,766.02 Vendor: 1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Check Sequence: 17 1826827 resale - soda pop 207.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 1826958 resale - soda pop 273.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 1832714 resale - soda pop 296.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 Check Total: 776.00 Vendor: 1684 VINOCOPIA Check Sequence: 18 0163987 resale- wine 384.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 0163987 resale - liquor 425.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 0163987 resale - beer n/a 120.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 0163987 freight 21.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 164694 resale - liquor 198.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 164694 freight 5.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 164738 freight 25.50 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 164738 resale - liquor 600.75 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 164738 resale- wine 904.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 Check Total: 2,683.25 Vendor: 1572 THE WINE COMPANY Check Sequence: 19 17421 resale- wine 252.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 17421 freight 6.30 11/03/2016 609- 49750- 433300 18824 resale- wine 216.00 11/03/2016 609- 49750- 425300 18824 freight 5.00 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/03/2016 - 10:39 AM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Total: 306.00 Total for Check Run: 251,347.70 Total of Number of Checks: 21 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/03/2016 - 10:39 AM) Check Sequence: 20 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 Check Sequence: 21 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and appro\ Date: 11/14/2016 Approved by May( Check Total: 479.30 Vendor: 1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC 7104130 resale - wine 2,299.93 7104130 freight 36.48 7105159 resale - wine 1,655.44 7105159 freight 21.60 Check Total: 4,013.45 Vendor: 2573 WOODLAND HILL VINEYARDS LLC 1657 resale - wine 306.00 Check Total: 306.00 Total for Check Run: 251,347.70 Total of Number of Checks: 21 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/03/2016 - 10:39 AM) Check Sequence: 20 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 Check Sequence: 21 11/03/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and appro\ Date: 11/14/2016 Approved by May( Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Debbie.Davidson Printed: 11/09/2016 - 1:41PM Batch: 00203.11.2016 - 203.11.2016 AP Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Vendor: 3974 A+ TAXI OF MONTICELLO INC Check Sequence: 1 20131094 October 2016 - 926 Rides 3,333.33 11/15/2016 10145178- 431990 Check Total: 3,333.33 Vendor: 1018 ALLIED BLACKTOP COMPANY Check Sequence: 2 22889 (126) gallon road OIl 409.50 11/15/2016 101 - 43120 - 422400 Check Total: 409.50 Vendor: 3991 ANOKA RAMSEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE Check Sequence: 3 00409149 Right To Know, Seasonal OSHA, AWAIR Traini 1,125.00 11/15/2016 101 - 41800 - 431960 00409184 Rapid Conflict Resolution & Decision Making ( 5,000.00 11/15/2016 101 - 41800 - 431960 Check Total: 6,125.00 Vendor: 1036 APEC AQUISITIONS INC Check Sequence: 4 121379 Freight 22.70 11/15/2016 226 - 45122 - 433300 121379 Masterlink Filters (28) 288.68 11/15/2016 226 - 45122 - 422990 Check Total: 311.38 Vendor: 4046 AST SPORTS INC Check Sequence: 5 17367 Shirts (13) 426.24 11/15/2016 101- 42400 - 421110 Check Total: 426.24 Vendor: 2886 AUSCO DESIGN AND MARKETING Check Sequence: 6 2654 (50) hats /mesh back- split Parks 116.50 11/15/2016 101 - 45201- 441700 2654 (50) hats /mesh back- split Public Works 116.50 11/15/2016 101 - 43120 - 441700 2654 (50) hats /mesh back- split Water 58.25 11/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 441700 2654 (50) hats /mesh back- split Water 58.25 11/15/2016 602 - 49490 - 441700 Check Total: 349.50 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Vendor: 1062 BEAUDRY OIL COMPANY Check Sequence: 7 418768 forklift gas- (3) cyliders 58.00 11/15/2016 101 - 43127 - 421990 Check Total: 58.00 Vendor: 1064 BECKER SOD LLC Check Sequence: 8 10682 (32) rolls sod 96.00 11/15/2016 101- 43130 - 421990 Check Total: 96.00 Vendor: 1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION Check Sequence: 9 56129000 resale -wine 736.00 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 56129000 resale - liquor 1,067.00 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 56129000 freight 27.00 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 94863800 resale - pickled asparagus 39.78 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425500 Check Total: 1,869.78 Vendor: 1067 BERNICK'S Check Sequence: 10 12610 Coffee 355.44 11/15/2016 101 - 41940 - 421990 188832 Resale - Pop, Water, Juice 325.00 11/15/2016 226 - 45127- 425410 191595 Resale - Pop, Water, 238.95 11/15/2016 226 - 45127- 425410 Check Total: 919.39 Vendor: 1080 BRAEMAR MAILING SERVICE INC Check Sequence: 11 57459 UB Qtr 3 2016 (393 1) FNM Insert 39.31 11/15/2016 656- 49870 - 434990 57459 UB Qtr 3 2016 (393 1) MCC Insert 39.31 11/15/2016 226 - 45122- 431950 57459 UB Qtr 3 2016 (3931) Print, Fold, Envelope (1/2 1,028.23 11/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 431800 57459 UB Qtr 3 2016 (3931) Print, Fold, Envelope (1/2 1,028.22 11/15/2016 602 - 49490 - 431800 Check Total: 2,135.07 Vendor: 3632 BRIAN BRAMLEY Check Sequence: 12 7296 ERS- (5) Hood PAC 11 P -84 Tan 196.72 11/15/2016 101 - 42200- 421120 7379 ERS- (3) Helmets 867.91 11/15/2016 101 - 42200 - 421120 Check Total: 1,064.63 Vendor: 4328 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIF Check Sequence: 13 1080550328 resale - liquor 1,679.00 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 1080550328 resale- wine 820.00 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 1080550328 freight 51.15 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 1080550329 resale - beer 156.60 11/15/2016 609- 49750- 425200 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Check Total: 2,706.75 Vendor: 1086 BURNHAM COMPANIES LLC Check Sequence: 14 4360 Diseased Elm removed -stump cut low -1549 E Bi 490.00 11/15/2016 101 - 46102 - 431990 Check Total: 490.00 Vendor: 1106 CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC Check Sequence: 15 00076089 Monthly Tank Rental 45.00 11/15/2016 226 - 45122- 441500 00972070 Bulk Carbon Dioxide (3661bs) 99.20 11/15/2016 226 - 45122- 421600 00974072 Bulk Carbon Dioxide (475 lbs) 121.00 11/15/2016 226 - 45122- 421600 Check Total: 265.20 Vendor: 3932 JULIE CHENEY Check Sequence: 16 10/20/2016 Mileage Reimbursement - GFOA Class - Alexan 100.44 11/15/2016 101 - 41520- 433100 Check Total: 100.44 Vendor: 3831 RAELYNN COOK Check Sequence: 17 10/19/2016 Mileage Reimbursement - Payroll Conference & 142.94 11/15/2016 101 - 41520- 433100 Check Total: 142.94 Vendor: 4563 ROBERT COPELAND Check Sequence: 18 11/03/2016 boots reimbursement 90.00 11/15/2016 602 - 49490 - 420650 Check Total: 90.00 Vendor: 2197 CORPORATE CONNECTION Check Sequence: 19 43584 Safety Lime Sweatshirt - MR 51.94 11/15/2016 101 - 43115- 421110 Check Total: 51.94 Vendor: 1124 CREATIVE FORMS AND CONCEPTS INC Check Sequence: 20 115061 2016 Tax Forms 246.64 11/15/2016 101 - 41520- 421990 Check Total: 246.64 Vendor: 1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 21 1222108 resale - beer 30,150.00 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 1222108 resale - beer n/a 109.00 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 135025 resale - beer 534.00 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 135026 resale - beer credit -19.05 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Check Total: 30,773.95 Vendor: 4566 TERAE DEMARAIS Check Sequence: 22 10/24/2016 Lifeguarding Sub 28.85 11/15/2016 226 - 45122- 431990 Check Total: 28.85 Vendor: 1980 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Check Sequence: 23 2017 Buyers Crd 2017 Buyers Card - ID #6618 License Type MO, 20.00 11/15/2016 609 - 49754- 443990 Check Total: 20.00 Vendor: 4567 SYLVIA DESSELLIER Check Sequence: 24 10/26/2016 Lifeguard Training Course refund 150.00 11/15/2016 226 - 45122- 347920 Check Total: 150.00 Vendor: 4233 DI -MAR CONSTRUCTION INC Check Sequence: 25 Voucher No 14 14C002 - PHOSPH - Voucher #14 52,515.05 11/15/2016 602 - 00000 - 165010 Voucher No 14 14C002 - DIGEST - Voucher #14 121,540.86 11/15/2016 602 - 00000 - 165010 Check Total: 174,055.91 Vendor: 1147 DOUBLE D ELECTRIC INC Check Sequence: 26 21118 Labor- (3) hrs. reconnect shop oil burner furnace 195.00 11/15/2016 101 - 43127 - 431990 21118 Materials- (3) Ins. reconnect shop oil burner furs 27.49 11/15/2016 101 - 43127- 431990 Check Total: 222.49 Vendor: 1153 ECM PUBLISHERS INC Check Sequence: 27 419153 Wamert Hearing - Ad# 605262 184.60 11/15/2016 101 - 41910 - 435100 421511 Brairwood Ave & CR 39 PH - Ad# 610764 101.53 11/15/2016 101 - 41910- 435100 421512 2016 -045 - Camping World PH - Ad# 610999 119.99 11/15/2016 101 - 41910 - 435100 424319 2016 -045 - Correct Camping World PH - Ad# 61 138.45 11/15/2016 101- 41910 - 435100 Check Total: 544.57 Vendor: 4191 ELK RIVER GREENHOUSE LLC Check Sequence: 28 10/21/2016 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 10/20/11 78.00 11/15/2016 226 - 00000 - 220100 Check Total: 78.00 Vendor: 4114 STEPHANIE ELLINGSON Check Sequence: 29 10/21/2016 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 10/13/11 69.00 11/15/2016 226 - 00000 - 220100 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Check Total: 69.00 Vendor: 1171 FEDERAL EXPRESS Check Sequence: 30 5 -590 -32875 Closing Docs for Sale of 413 4th Street to All Ar 50.77 11/15/2016 213 - 46301 - 432200 Check Total: 50.77 Vendor: 2561 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2516 Check Sequence: 31 223588 (40) 5/8x3/4 T10 Meter ECDR USG Inside 4,965.88 11/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 422710 Check Total: 4,965.88 Vendor: 2273 FIBERNET MONTICELLO - ACH Check Sequence: 32 11/1/2016 City Hall Phone - November 2016 1,093.78 11/15/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 11/1/2016 MCC Phone - November 2016 617.19 11/15/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 11/1/2016 Ballfrelds Phone - November 2016 19.46 11/15/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 11/1/2016 DMV Phone - November 2016 262.12 11/15/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 11/1/2016 Highway Liquor Phone - November 2016 279.56 11/15/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 11/1/2016 Fire Hall Phone - November 2016 242.50 11/15/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 11/1/2016 Public Works Phone - November 2016 284.91 11/15/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 11/1/2016 Parks Phone - November 2016 113.81 11/15/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 11/1/2016 Prairie Center Phone - November 2016 14.16 11/15/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 11/1/2016 Sheriff Phone - November 2016 68.73 11/15/2016 702 - 00000 - 432100 11/1/2016 City Hall Internet - November 2016 99.95 11/15/2016 702 - 00000 - 432300 11/1/2016 MCC Internet - November 2016 10.00 11/15/2016 702- 00000 - 432300 11/1/2016 Ballfields Internet - November 2016 10.00 11/15/2016 702 - 00000 - 432300 11/1/2016 DMV Internet - November 2016 41.95 11/15/2016 702 - 00000 - 432300 11/1/2016 Hi Way Liquors Internet - November 2016 41.95 11/15/2016 702 - 00000 - 432300 11/1/2016 Fire Hall Internet - November 2016 41.95 11/15/2016 702 - 00000 - 432300 11/1/2016 Animal Shelter Internet - November 2016 29.95 11/15/2016 702 - 00000 - 432300 11/1/2016 Public Works Internet - November 2016 69.95 11/15/2016 702 - 00000 - 432300 11/1/2016 Sheriff Internet - November 2016 41.95 11/15/2016 702 - 00000 - 432300 11/1/2016 City Hall Cable - November 2016 12.30 11/15/2016 101 - 41310 - 431990 11/1/2016 MCC Cable - November 2016 125.14 11/15/2016 226 - 45122- 432500 11/1/2016 Data Hosting - November 2016 500.00 11/15/2016 702 - 00000 - 431900 11/1/2016 Service Contract - November 2016 250.00 11/15/2016 702 - 00000 - 431900 Check Total: 4,271.31 Vendor: 1174 FINKEN WATER CENTERS Check Sequence: 33 58032TF (8) 40# Solar Salt 58.00 11/15/2016 101- 43127 - 421990 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Check Total: 58.00 Vendor: 4051 MICHELE FORSMAN Check Sequence: 34 109 Library Bat Program Supplies 9.11 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 220150 Check Total: 9.11 Vendor: 1740 BRAD FYLE Check Sequence: 35 10/17/16 Oct 9 Open House- cookies/bars 209.30 11/15/2016 101 - 42200 - 421990 Check Total: 209.30 Vendor: 3748 JEFFREY D GARDNER Check Sequence: 36 10/21/2016 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 10/13/11 91.00 11/15/2016 226 - 00000 - 220100 Check Total: 91.00 Vendor: 3762 GARRETTS DIAMOND CITY BREAD Check Sequence: 37 10/21/2016 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 10/13/21 66.00 11/15/2016 226 - 00000 - 220100 Check Total: 66.00 Vendor: 1198 GENERAL RENTAL CENTER OF MONTICEI Check Sequence: 38 218460 ZPARKS- ELLPRK- Rebar shears & bender- She 15.00 11/15/2016 229 - 45202- 453010 Check Total: 15.00 Vendor: 1413 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC Check Sequence: 39 6100575 (239) tickets Oct. 2016 -1/2 Water 161.33 11/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 432770 6100575 (239) tickets Oct. 2016 -1/2 FNM 161.32 11/15/2016 656- 49877 - 432770 Check Total: 322.65 Vendor: 3859 TAMARAHANSON Check Sequence: 40 10/21/2016 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 10/20/11 43.00 11/15/2016 226 - 00000 - 220100 Check Total: 43.00 Vendor: 1223 HAWKINS INC Check Sequence: 41 3969508 Pool Chem: Azone, Clearitas, Hydrochloric Acic 923.03 11/15/2016 226 - 45122- 421600 Check Total: 923.03 Vendor: 4478 MEGAN HILLUKKA Check Sequence: 42 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 10/21/2016 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 10/20/1 10.00 11/15/2016 226 - 00000 - 220100 Check Total: 10.00 9/19- 10/18/2016 Fire Acct. 1400-017-223-399 Vendor: 3229 JEFF HOGLUND 101 - 42200 - 421200 Check Sequence: 43 0110716 Vinyl Graphics for New Vehicle 72.00 11/15/2016 101 - 42400 - 443990 3749 Check Total: 72.00 Check Sequence: 46 Vendor: 4218 HOHENSTEINS, INC 27.00 11/15/2016 Check Sequence: 44 858644 resale - beer 638.00 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Check Total: 638.00 Vendor: 1242 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFICE Check Sequence: 45 10182016 9/19- 10/18/2016 Fire Acct. 1400-017-223-399 271.09 11/15/2016 101 - 42200 - 421200 Check Total: 271.09 Vendor: 3749 DANIEL PAUL HUNZ Check Sequence: 46 10/21/2016 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 10/13/11 27.00 11/15/2016 226 - 00000 - 220100 Check Total: 27.00 Vendor: 3971 INTL UNION OF OPER ENGINEERS LOCAL Check Sequence: 47 11/1/2016 December Health Insurance 14,430.00 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 217061 11/1/2016 December Health Insurance 48,750.00 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 217061 Check Total: 63,180.00 Vendor: 1259 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING Check Sequence: 48 2605010 resale - beer 1,482.40 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 2605010 freight 3.00 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 Check Total: 1,485.40 Vendor: 1263 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Check Sequence: 49 5576808 resale - liquor 924.48 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 5576808 freight 11.28 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5579194 freight 2.88 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5579194 resale - liquor 215.18 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 5579195 resale - liquor 7,463.84 11/15/2016 609 - 49750 - 425100 5579195 freight 52.21 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5579196 freight 10.08 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5579196 resale - wine 429.85 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 5580517 resale - liquor 2,554.75 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 5580517 freight 34.56 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 5580519 resale - beer 21.99 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 598806 resale - wine credit inv #5565509 - 231.70 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 598806 freight - credit inv #5565509 -2.88 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 598807 resale - liquor - 312.00 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 Check Total: 11,174.52 Vendor: 2641 JOHNSON MATERIALS INC Check Sequence: 50 2598 ZPARKS- ELLPRK- (169.37) Ton Pit Run 796.04 11/15/2016 229 - 45202- 453010 Check Total: 796.04 Vendor: 1270 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN CHARTERED Check Sequence: 51 MN190 -00101 General EDA Matters Through 9/30/16 988.00 11/15/2016 213 - 46301 - 430400 MN325 -00031 Conveyance of Fred's Auto Property 120.50 11/15/2016 213 - 46301- 430400 MN325 -00032 Sale of 413 4th St W 468.75 11/15/2016 213 - 46301 - 430400 Check Total: 1,577.25 Vendor: 3829 STEVE LANGANKI Check Sequence: 52 1018 Porta Toilets (16) 8/16- 10/11/16; 1015 addt'l Mor 1,604.44 11/15/2016 101 - 45201- 431990 1018 Porta Toilets- (8) units Bertram - school district t 240.00 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 115030 1018 Porta Toilets- 3) units Phillip Lavalle run 90.00 11/15/2016 226- 45122- 431990 Check Total: 1,934.44 Vendor: 2626 HARRY LANTTO Check Sequence: 53 10/25/2016 Candidate Forum 10/17/16 62.50 11/15/2016 101 - 41110 - 431990 10/25/2016 City Council Meeting Recording 10/10/16 & 10/ 122.50 11/15/2016 101 - 41110 - 431990 10/25/2016 Planning Commission Meeting Recording 10/4/1 60.00 11/15/2016 101 - 41910 - 431990 10/25/2016 EDA Meeting Recording 10/12/16 60.00 11/15/2016 213 - 46301 - 431990 Check Total: 305.00 Vendor: 1292 LEROY JOB TRUCKING INC Check Sequence: 54 18382 Animal Charge (6) 70.20 11/15/2016 101 - 42700 - 431990 Check Total: 70.20 Vendor: 3522 LIVE LAUGH AND BLOOM Check Sequence: 55 024800 Centerpieces for IEDC Breakfast (11) 253.00 11/15/2016 213 - 46301 - 443990 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Total: 253.00 Vendor: 1303 M AMUNDSON CIGAR & CANDY CO, LLP Check Sequence: 56 226781 resale - tobacco; can coolers; cork screws; etc 979.55 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 226781 resale - cigarettes; juice 850.41 11/15/2016 609- 49750- 425500 Check Total: 1,829.96 Vendor: 1229 MARRS ADVERTISING & DESIGN INC Check Sequence: 57 1357 Business Cards - Council - BS, CG, LH 196.50 11/15/2016 101 - 41110 - 443990 Check Total: 196.50 Vendor: 3745 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY Check Sequence: 58 820999 (733) gallons diesel @ $2.21 1,621.56 11/15/2016 101 - 43120 - 421200 821000 (773) gallons unleaded @ $1.88 1,449.46 11/15/2016 101 - 43120 - 421200 Check Total: 3,071.02 Vendor: 1308 MARCO INC Check Sequence: 59 315595124 10/10/16 - 11/10/16 Contract Payment 2,394.55 11/15/2016 702 - 00000 - 424100 Check Total: 2,394.55 Vendor: 1330 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS Check Sequence: 60 400451000526 (213) Transactions - September 2016 191.70 11/15/2016 101 - 42100 - 431990 Check Total: 191.70 Vendor: 3816 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT COMPAN Check Sequence: 61 370013 (18) 6" CL52 DIP SJ W /Gkt; (6) All Thread Rod 506.96 11/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 422700 Check Total: 506.96 Vendor: 2068 MN DEPT OF AGRICULTURE Check Sequence: 62 2017 Renewal 2017 Nursery Stock Dealer Cert. Renewal 250.00 11/15/2016 101 - 45201- 443300 Check Total: 250.00 Vendor: 1349 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION Check Sequence: 63 P00006552 15C001 - MNDOT Inspections (Concrete, Biturr 5,290.61 11/15/2016 400 - 43300 - 459011 Check Total: 5,290.61 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Vendor: 1971 MN FALL MAINTENANCE EXPO Check Sequence: 64 PO #002016 2016 MN Fall Maintenance Expo (6) attendees- 150.00 11/15/2016 101 - 45201- 433100 PO #002016 2016 MN Fall Maintenance Expo (7) attendees- : 175.00 11/15/2016 101 - 43120 - 433100 PO #002016 2016 MN Fall Maintenance Expo (2) attendees - 50.00 11/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 433100 Check Total: 375.00 Vendor: 2512 MONTICELLO PLBG HTG AC LLC Check Sequence: 65 16306 (600) Salt & delivery 102.00 11/15/2016 101 - 42200- 421990 Check Total: 102.00 Vendor: 1375 MONTICELLO PRINTING INC Check Sequence: 66 10/03/2016 (1000) #10 envelopes- printed. 267.00 11/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 421990 10/05/2016 utx- (150) Wine Tasting Tickets 70.65 11/15/2016 609 - 49754- 425550 10/2016 (150) Incident Rep; (50) fire alarm rep; (2) ea. B 183.05 11/15/2016 101 - 42200 - 421990 Check Total: 520.70 Vendor: 1373 MONTICELLO SCHOOL DISTRICT #882 Check Sequence: 67 10/31/2016 ZMISMS - Escrow Refund 7,402.30 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 10/31/2016 ZMISPW - Escrow Refund 6,080.00 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 Check Total: 13,482.30 Vendor: 1379 MONTICELLO UMPIRE ASSOCIATION Check Sequence: 68 10/13/2016 Fall Softball League & Tournament (70 Games) 1,960.00 11/15/2016 226 - 45127- 430160 Check Total: 1,960.00 Vendor: 2323 MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE INC Check Sequence: 69 P0221246 Rating Agency Fee - G.O. Street Reconst & Imp 11,000.00 11/15/2016 400 - 43300 - 462030 Check Total: 11,000.00 Vendor: 4549 ANN MOSACK Check Sequence: 70 10/17/2016 Mileage Reimbursement - MRPA Meeting (66 m 35.64 11/15/2016 226 - 45122- 433100 Check Total: 35.64 Vendor: 2518 NEOFUNDS BY NEOPOST Check Sequence: 71 11/3/2016 Postage Purchased 10/26/16 1,000.00 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 155010 11/3/2016 Postage for Packages to Dept Public Safety - Od 153.13 11/15/2016 217 - 41990 - 432200 11/3/2016 Postage for RLC Reimbursed ll /1 /16 Receipt #1 6.10 11/15/2016 101 - 41940 - 432200 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Check Total: 1,159.23 Vendor: 4490 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY _ Check Sequence: 72 Pay Voucher 5 15C001 - Pay Voucher #5 - 2016 Street Reconstr 572,378.84 11/15/2016 400 - 43300 - 459011 Check Total: 572,378.84 Vendor: 3363 NORTHERN STATES POWER Check Sequence: 73 11/4/2016 15D003- Escrow Refund 7,081.75 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 Check Total: 7,081.75 Vendor: 4368 OFFICE DEPOT INC Check Sequence: 74 874535226001 (2) 25pk munu pouch; doz. Sharpie markers 69.71 11/15/2016 101 - 43110 - 421990 Check Total: 69.71 Vendor: 1412 OMANN BROTHERS INC Check Sequence: 75 12500 (5.01) AC Fines mix 320.64 11/15/2016 101 - 43120- 422400 12506 (14.03) SPWEA240A 621.81 11/15/2016 101- 43120 - 422400 12514 (3.01) AC Fines mix 234.78 11/15/2016 101- 43120 - 422400 12519 (2.01) AC Fines mix 128.64 11/15/2016 101 - 43120 - 422400 12532 (2.49) LV4 Mix 110.06 11/15/2016 101 - 43120 - 422400 Check Total: 1,415.93 Vendor: 1273 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO Check Sequence: 76 8568057 resale - wine 1,350.12 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 8568057 freight 18.75 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 Check Total: 1,368.87 Vendor: 1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO Check Sequence: 77 2067126 resale- wine 518.35 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 2067126 freight 14.40 11/15/2016 609- 49750- 433300 2068919 resale - liquor 940.10 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 2068919 freight 10.56 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2068920 freight 1.44 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2068920 resale- wine 82.50 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 2069761 resale - liquor 1,259.59 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 2069761 freight 11.52 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2069762 freight 20.16 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 2069762 resale - condiment 134.28 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425500 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Invoice No Description 2069762 resale - wine AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Amount Check Total: Vendor: 4571 PMA SECURITIES INC 11/3/2016 2016A GO Street Reconstruction & Improvemer 609 - 49750- 425300 Check Total: Vendor: 4564 POLE PAINTING PLUS, INC 460 Rapid Renovations- Stoplight Painting Project- i Check Total: Vendor: 2066 PROGRESSIVE BUILDERS 11/4/2016 Escrow Refund - 4396 87th ST.Featherstone Dei 400 - 43300 - 462030 Check Total: Vendor: 4565 R HOMES 10/19/2016 Escrow Refund - 6326 Bakken Street/Carlisle Vi 10/19/2016 Escrow Refund - 6346 Bakken Street/Carlisle Vi 10/19/2016 Escrow Refund - 6947 92nd St/Sunset Ponds 2nc 10/19/2016 Escrow Refund - 6804 93rd St/Sunset Ponds 3rd 10/19/2016 Escrow Refund - 9171 Golden Pond Ln/Sunset F 10/19/2016 Escrow Refund - 9173 Golden Pond Ln/Sunset F 10/21/2016 Escrow Refund - 9177 Golden Pond Ln/Sunset F 10/25/2016 Escrow Refund - 9175 Golden Pond Ln/Sunset F AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Amount Check Total: Vendor: 4512 SARAH RATHLISBERGER 10/25/2016 Mileage Reimbursement - GFOA Class - Albem 609 - 49750- 425300 Check Total: Vendor: 4570 RED ROOSTER PROPERTIES 10/31/2016 2016034 - Escrow Refund Check Total: Vendor: 1455 RED'S MARATHON 10/07/16 #231 gas AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1,092.00 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 4,084.90 Check Sequence: 78 1,500.00 11/15/2016 400 - 43300 - 462030 1,500.00 Check Sequence: 79 28,900.00 11/15/2016 245- 43162 - 443990 28,900.00 Check Sequence: 80 2,000.00 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 2,000.00 Check Sequence: 81 2,000.00 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 2,000.00 11/15/2016 101- 00000 - 220110 2,000.00 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 2,000.00 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 2,000.00 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 2,000.00 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 2,000.00 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 2.000.00 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 Check Sequence: 82 10.26 11/15/2016 101-41520-433100 Check Sequence: 83 643.50 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 Check Sequence: 84 7.00 11/15/2016 101 - 45201- 421200 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Check Total: 7.00 Vendor: 4022 REINHART FOODSERVICE LLC Check Sequence: 85 555224 Resale: Cookies, Chips, Popcorn, Hot Dogs, Pre1 652.96 11/15/2016 226 - 45127- 425410 568679 Cheese Sauce, Cocoa, Hot Dogs, Pizza, Pretzels, 639.12 11/15/2016 226 - 45127- 425410 Check Total: 1,292.08 Vendor: 4568 RIGHT -WAY CAULKING INC Check Sequence: 86 23013 Recaulking Project @ Library 12,029.00 11/15/2016 101- 45501- 440100 Check Total: 12,029.00 Vendor: 1474 PATRICIAA SALZWEDEL Check Sequence: 87 11/7/2016 Mileage Reimbursement - Oct (300 miles) 162.00 11/15/2016 101 - 42700 - 433100 Nov 1st Semi Monthly Contract Payment 1,593.75 11/15/2016 101 - 42700- 431200 Check Total: 1,755.75 Vendor: 3751 CHRISTINE SCHYMA Check Sequence: 88 10/21/2016 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 10/20/11 84.00 11/15/2016 226 - 00000 - 220100 Check Total: 84.00 Vendor: 3860 PATRICIA SCOTT Check Sequence: 89 10/21/2016 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 10/20/1 25.00 11/15/2016 226 - 00000 - 220100 Check Total: 25.00 Vendor: 2443 SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA INC Check Sequence: 90 W5400450 10/08/16 - Bjevga Wedding R2205 140.00 11/15/2016 226 - 45122- 431992 W5406468 10/15/16 - Kreuger Wedding R2165 140.00 11/15/2016 226 - 45122- 431992 W5413936 10/22/16 - Adamek 82196 140.00 11/15/2016 226 - 45122- 431992 Check Total: 420.00 Vendor: 4572 SARAH SEELEY Check Sequence: 91 11/3/2016 Library Program Supplies Reimbursement 141.21 11/15/2016 101 - 00000- 220150 Check Total: 141.21 Vendor: 2497 SHERBURNE WRIGHT CABLE COMMISSIC Check Sequence: 92 10/27/2016 Cable Franchise Fees - TDS/Bridge Water Q3 2C 9,557.40 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 208020 10/27/2016 Cable PEG Fees - TDS /Bridge Water Q3 2016 1,905.74 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 208020 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Check Total: 11,463.14 Vendor: 4573 SIGNATURE DELIVERY Check Sequence: 93 10/31/2016 2016036- Escrow Refund 969.00 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 Check Total: 969.00 Vendor: 1490 CYNTHIA R SIMPSON Check Sequence: 94 894150 October 2016 cleaning Fire Hall 100.00 11/15/2016 101 - 42200 - 431990 Check Total: 100.00 Vendor: 3309 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS, Check Sequence: 95 1471302 resale - liquor 1,378.47 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 1471302 freight 11.43 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 1471303 freight 25.20 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 1471303 resale - wine 1,527.89 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 Check Total: 2,942.99 Vendor: 2603 SPECIALTY TURF & AG, INC Check Sequence: 96 145891 sidewalk & blvd. spraying - 2.5 gal Transfilm 110.00 11/15/2016 101 - 43125- 421600 I45897 2.5 gal- Ex -Salt Saline Soil Treatment- streets 220.00 11/15/2016 101 - 43125- 421600 Check Total: 330.00 Vendor: 1497 SPECTRUM SUPPLY COMPANY Check Sequence: 97 55830 (4) can liner; (6) paper towels; (1) safety eyewea 408.82 11/15/2016 101 - 45203- 421990 95587 (4) Vehicle First Aid Kits for Park trucks 104.52 11/15/2016 101 - 45201- 420650 Check Total: 513.34 Vendor: 2564 SPORTS PRO LLC Check Sequence: 98 665 Labor - Work Order #481 - Stair Master & Spinr 120.00 11/15/2016 226 - 45122- 422105 665 Parts - Work Order #481: Cable, Brake Pads, Ch 275.75 11/15/2016 226 - 45122- 422105 680 Labor -Qtrly Preventative Maint Treadmills (13) 545.00 11/15/2016 226 - 45122- 431990 684 Labor - Work Order #492 - Replace Part & Over 90.00 11/15/2016 226 - 45122- 422105 684 Work Order #492 - Parts for Stair Master 77.75 11/15/2016 226 - 45122- 422105 Check Total: 1,108.50 Vendor: 4513 AARON STAEHNKE Check Sequence: 99 10/21/2016 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 9/29/16 75.00 11/15/2016 226 - 00000 - 220100 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Total: 75.00 Vendor: 3594 STRATEGIC EQUIPMENT, LLC Check Sequence: 100 2735849 (2) 500/bale #57 bags 46.39 11/15/2016 609 - 49754- 421990 2735850 asst. bags; foam cups 231.24 11/15/2016 609- 49754- 421990 2744189 asst. bags; can liner; case coffee; plastic knifes 298.90 11/15/2016 609 - 49754- 421990 Check Total: 576.53 Vendor: 3251 STRATEGIC INSIGHTS INC Check Sequence: 101 205 Plan It - License Renewal/Upgrade; Valid to 1 /1/ 675.00 11/15/2016 101 - 41520- 421990 Check Total: 675.00 Vendor: 2254 SUNRAY PRINTING SOLUTIONS INC Check Sequence: 102 50658 Fall/Winter Newsletter Printing & Mailing Servi 2,937.80 11/15/2016 101 - 41940 - 431950 Check Total: 2,937.80 Vendor: 1516 TASC Check Sequence: 103 W882514 12/1/16 - 12/31/16 Admin Fees 72.25 11/15/2016 101 - 49240 - 413500 Check Total: 7125 Vendor: 4569 LAURIE & JON TENNESSEN Check Sequence: 104 11/4/2016 14D004- ECOSTS- Escrow Refund PID 155 -231- 338.50 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 Check Total: 338.50 Vendor: 4459 JAMES THARES Check Sequence: 105 11/4/2016 Mileage Reimbursement - (20 Miles) 10.80 11/15/2016 213 - 46301- 433100 Check Total: 10.80 Vendor: 1522 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Check Sequence: 106 1162519 -2 resale- credit correction to inv 1162519 -19.50 11/15/2016 609- 49750- 425200 1165933 resale -beer 4,725.00 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425200 Check Total: 4,705.50 Vendor: 4536 JACOB THUNANDER Check Sequence: 107 10/18/2016 Mileage Reimbursement - St.Cloud (63 Miles) 34.24 11/15/2016 101 - 41910- 433100 10/28/2016 Mileage Reimbursement - Wright Co Recorder (: 11.66 11/15/2016 101 - 41910 - 433100 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Invoice No Description AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number 140.70 888.41 20.00 24.00 478.50 440.00 180.00 Check Sequence: 108 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 115030 11/15/2016 101 - 43120 - 422110 Check Sequence: 109 11/15/2016 601- 49440 - 432200 11/15/2016 602 - 49490 - 432200 Check Sequence: 110 11/15/2016 602 - 49480- 430800 Check Sequence: 111 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 Check Sequence: 112 11/15/2016 226 - 00000 - 220100 Check Sequence: 113 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 Check Sequence: 114 11/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 422740 Check Total: Vendor: 1627 TWIN CITY OPTICAL 877220 M. Haaland- employee portion 877220 M. Haaland- city portion Check Total: Vendor: 1544 US POSTAL SERVICE 10/17/2016 PI 42 - UB Qtr 3 2016 (3,931 pcs) (1/2) 10/17/2016 PI 42 - UB Qtr 3 2016 (3,931 pcs) (1/2) Check Total: Vendor: 1550 VEOLIA WATER N AM OPERATING SERV L: 00062509 December 2016 WWTP Operations & Maintenaj Check Total: Vendor: 1684 VINOCOPIA 165302 freight 165302 resale - n/a beer 165302 resale - liquor 165302 resale - wine 165320 resale- wine 165320 freight Check Total: Vendor: 4514 LY LEE VUE 10/21/2016 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 10/20/11 Check Total: Vendor: 2067 WAG PARTNERSHIP 10/31/2016 15D005 - Escrow Refund Check Total: Vendor: 1561 WATER LABORATORIES INC 5870 Oct. 2016 Water Samples Check Total: AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number 140.70 888.41 20.00 24.00 478.50 440.00 180.00 Check Sequence: 108 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 115030 11/15/2016 101 - 43120 - 422110 Check Sequence: 109 11/15/2016 601- 49440 - 432200 11/15/2016 602 - 49490 - 432200 Check Sequence: 110 11/15/2016 602 - 49480- 430800 Check Sequence: 111 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425400 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425100 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 425300 11/15/2016 609 - 49750- 433300 Check Sequence: 112 11/15/2016 226 - 00000 - 220100 Check Sequence: 113 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 Check Sequence: 114 11/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 422740 Invoice No Description Vendor: 1567 WES OLSON ELECTRIC LLC 8051 ZPARKS- ELLPRK- Labor- rough in conduits fo 8051 ZPARKS- ELLPRK- Materials - rough in conduit Check Total: Vendor: 1581 WRIGHT CO RECORDER 10/28/2016 County Recording Fees - Deed 155.010.034150 Check Total: Vendor: 1580 WRIGHT COUNTY JOURNAL PRESS 10/31/16 Wine Sale Oct 7 -22 Full - 10/2 & 16/2016 AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Total: Vendor: 1584 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01160 -381 Standard Specification & Design Guidelines - Se 01494 -480 50 ZRCFOS - Fallen Overpass Prelim Design Phase 01494 -700 40 General WWTP Phase 4 - Sept 2016 01494 -780 23 MS4 /SWPPP Services Phase 4 - Sept 2016 01494 -800 33 100009 CSAH 75/TH25 Intersection Imp - Sept 01494 -880 24 Wellhead Protection Plan Amendment - Sept 201 01494 -950 25 14C002 - Phosphorus Construction Admin Phase 01494 -950 25 14C002 - Digester Construction Admin Phase 8 01627 -680 13 16D002 - Mills Fleet Farm Plan Review - Sept 2 01627 -990 12 15C002 - 95th St NE Extension - Sept 2016 02596 -010 21 2016 General Engineering Services Phase 3 - Se] 02596 -010 21 2016 General Engineering Services Phase 3 - Se] 02596 -010 21 2016 General Engineering Services Phase 3 - Se1 02596 -010 21 2016 Hourly Phase 4 - Sept 2016 02596 -030 12 2016 Maps - Sept 2016 02596 -100 16 15C001 CONSTR - 2016 Street Recon Project - 02596 -110 15 ZZBCOL- MASTER - BCOL Athletic Complex 1 02596 -140 10 15C003 - 7th St Retaining Wall - Sept 2016 02596-1508 2016 WCA Services - Bill to Don Jensen - Sept 02596-1609 15C004 - 7th St/TH 25 Intersection Improve Pha 02596-2504 ZMISHS - School District PUD Plan Review - S 02596-2604 16C002 - Spirit Hills Trail Improvements - Sept 02596-2803 2016 -038 - IRT (Fallon Ave) Plan Review - Sept 02596-2903 Monticello Business Center Drainage Study - Se 02596-3103 FEMA Mapping Assistance - Sept 2016 02596-3201 16C002- CONSTR- Rolling Woods Park Sidewall AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number 6.65 Check Sequence: 117 1,500.64 11/15/2016 609 - 49754- 434990 1,500.64 Check Sequence: 115 235.00 11/15/2016 229 - 45202- 453010 42.96 11/15/2016 229 - 45202- 453010 277.96 11/15/2016 101 - 43111- 430300 Check Sequence: 116 6.65 11/15/2016 101 - 41910- 431990 6.65 Check Sequence: 117 1,500.64 11/15/2016 609 - 49754- 434990 1,500.64 Check Sequence: 118 356.25 11/15/2016 101 - 43111- 430300 1,700.50 11/15/2016 101 - 43111- 430300 1,722.00 11/15/2016 602 - 49480- 430300 55.50 11/15/2016 101 - 43111- 430300 672.25 11/15/2016 400 - 43300 - 459010 349.50 11/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 430300 4,247.25 11/15/2016 602 - 00000 - 165010 5,537.25 11/15/2016 602 - 00000 - 165010 1,998.50 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 4,740.00 11/15/2016 400 - 43300 - 459012 2,583.34 11/15/2016 101 - 43111- 430300 2,583.33 11/15/2016 601 - 49440 - 430300 2,583.33 11/15/2016 602 - 49490 - 430300 539.00 11/15/2016 263 - 49200 - 431990 109.00 11/15/2016 101 - 43111- 430300 51,872.50 11/15/2016 400 - 43300 - 459011 2,870.00 11/15/2016 229 - 45202- 431990 266.50 11/15/2016 400 - 43300 - 459013 237.00 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 115030 73.50 11/15/2016 400 - 43300- 459014 1,490.00 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 90.75 11/15/2016 229 - 45202- 453910 147.00 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 3,912.00 11/15/2016 263 - 49200 - 431990 2,126.75 11/15/2016 101 - 43111- 430300 1,924.25 11/15/2016 229- 45202- 453910 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 02596 -330 1 2016 -042 - Warnert/Sherbume Bank Plan Reviei 735.00 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 02596-3501 2016 -045 - Camping World Plan Review - Sept, 294.00 11/15/2016 101 - 00000 - 220110 Check Total: 95,816.25 Vendor: 1589 ZIEGLER CAT Check Sequence: 119 SW050264142 Park Lift Station Generator - trblshoot voltage rel 363.24 11/15/2016 602 - 49490 - 422100 Check Total: 363.24 Total for Check Run: 1,202,861.41 Total of Number of Checks: 119 The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and appr Date: 11/14/2016 Approved by AP- Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (11/09/2016 - 1:41 PA Ma City Council Agenda: 11/14/16 2B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments (TE) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to ratify the hiring and departures of employees that have occurred recently in the departments listed. It is recommended that the Council officially ratify the hiring /departure of all listed employees including part-time and seasonal workers. Al. Budget Impact: (positions are generally included in budget) A2. Staff Work Load Impact: If new positions, there may be some training involved. If terminated positions, existing staff would pick up those hours, as needed, until replaced. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to ratify the hire /departures of the employees as identified on the attached list. 2. Motion to deny the recommended hires and departures. C. RECOMMENDATION: By statute the City Council has the authority to approve all hires /departures. City staff recommends Alternative #1, for the Council to approve the hires and/or departures as listed. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • List of new /terminated employees 1 NEW EMPLOYEES Name Title Department Hire Date Class Bryan Gobar Guest Service Lead MCC 10/19/2016 PT Tessa Zalomsky Slide Attendant MCC 10/19/2016 PT Noah Thomsen Lifeguard MCC 10/19/2016 PT Paul Fischer Clerk Liquor Store 11/1/2016 PT Justin Bateman Custodian MCC 11/14/2016 PT Name Reason Department Last Day Class Sarah Good Voluntary MCC 7/25/16 PT Katharine Densen Voluntary MCC 8/24/16 PT Carlee Hinz Voluntary MCC 8/28/16 PT Zac Trushenski Involuntary MCC 10/16/16 PT Scott Imdieke Voluntary Streets 10/28/16 Seasonal Randy Blair Voluntary Parks 10/28/16 Seasonal Chad Hadley Voluntary Parks 10/28/16 Seasonal Tim Genung Voluntary Parks 10/28/16 Seasonal Charles DeGrio Voluntary Parks 10/28/16 Seasonal Brian Lee Voluntary Liquor 11/18/16 PT New Hire and Terms City Council 2016: 11/8/2016 City Council Agenda: 11/14/16 2C. Consideration of approving the sale or disposal of surplus City property (WO) There is no report this City Council cycle. City Council Agenda: 11/14/16 21). Consideration of adopting Resolution 2016 -084 changing to an "Open Book" format in lieu of the formal Local Board of Appeal and Equalization meetings for the 2017 assessment (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: At the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization meeting held last spring, the County presented an option for cities to change to an "Open Book" format. The "open book" is an alternative to the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization meeting. An "open book" meeting is a meeting held by the County Assessor's office to discuss property owners' questions regarding their assessments. Valuation and classification issues are handled by the assessor's staff on a one -on -one basis with the property owner. A number of jurisdictions have decided to move to this option. Some of the benefits are: 1) provides for a less intimidating process for the property owner; 2) cost /time savings to the local board including eliminating the need to have a trained member and eliminating the costs to hold the meeting; and 3) cost /time savings for the County to hold fewer meeting throughout April. In order to make this chance, the City must approve the change and notify the County in writing by December 1, 2016 for the 2017 assessments. The local board can be reinstated by resolution for the next year if the City so chooses. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2016 approving a change to an "Open Book" format in lieu of the formal Local Board of Appeal and Equalization meetings for 2017 assessment 2. Motion to deny. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City Staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Resolution 2016 -084 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-084 AUTHORIZING AN "OPEN BOOK" FORMAT IN LIEU OF THE LOCAL BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION MEETINS FOR THE 2017 ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, the Wright County Assessor's Office has presented an option of moving to an "Open Book" format in lieu of the formal local Board of Appeal and Equalization meeting for the 2017 assessments; and WHEREAS, to make the change to an Open Book format, Wright County must receive notification by December 1, 2016; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA that the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota has voted to change from the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization Meeting format to an Open Book meeting format starting with the 2017 Assessment. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 14th day of November, 2016. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk City Council Agenda: 11/14/2016 2E. Consideration to approve purchase of a new $16,927 Alitec Cold Planer for the Public Works Department through the Central Equipment (Internal Service) Fund. A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Council is asked to consider authorizing the purchase of a new Alitec cold planer from Titan Machinery. This planer will replace the old 2002 Alitec cold planer which has been a very good tool but it has met its life expectancy after 14 years of use. The Street Department has an ongoing Pavement Management Program and part of that program is patching streets. A cold planer is an attachment for our skid loader used to mill asphalt prior to patching. On an average, we mill about 60 ton of asphalt a year so this is a very important and necessary tool for our program. Purchasing from the State Contract satisfies bidding process requirements, saving the City money with the power of quantity purchasing through the state. The vendor chosen from the State Contract is Titan Machinery of Rogers. The state contract price for the Alitec CDI6ATD cold planer is $16,927. The old planer will be sold at a public auction. Al. Budget Impact: Public Works has budgeted the planer's $16,927 purchase through the Central Equipment Fund. The Central Equipment Fund leases the equipment to the benefitting budget unit (Streets). The annual lease payments provide funding for additional equipment purchases. The Central Equipment Fund is an internal service fund that provides financing for governmental fund (General Fund) capital equipment purchases of $10,000 or more. The Central Equipment Fund recovers equipment costs through annual lease payments from the benefitting department. The annual recovery for this purchase is $2,100. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff workload impacts of this new unit will be very positive. The new cold planer will improve staff efficiencies with better milling and fewer breakdowns. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to authorize the purchase of an Alitec cold planer from Titan Machinery based upon their state contract pricing of $16,927. Additionally, authorization to sell the old planer at public auction following delivery of the new router. 2. Motion to deny purchasing the new router at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends the City Council approve the replacement of the old Alitec cold planer with a new Alitec cold planer from Titan Machinery and to sell the old router at public auction as outlined in Alternative #1. City Council Agenda: 11/14/2016 D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. State contract pricing from Titan Machinery for the Alitec Cold Planer. B. Alitec Cold Planer Specs. Quotation 14375 James Rd. 10/20/2016 TMAN Rogers, Mn. 55374 MACHINERY Tom Moores City of Monticello 505 Walnut St Monticello, Mn. 55303 763 295 -3170 Prepared by: Bill Greeley Sales Representitive Mobile: 612 - 865 -3052 Quantity Description Total 1 We are pleased to quote (1) new Alitec CP16ATD Cold Planner for a Case 430 HF skid steer. Includes wiring harness to your 14 pin connector. Per the Minnesota State contract #107187 CP16ATD /S /C Cold Planner $ 18,254.00 E0055 wiring harness $ 144.00 Sub Total $ 18,398.00 Less 8% per the contract. $ 16,927.00 FOB Rogers, Mn. Please allow 3 weeks for delivery. TOTAL $ 16,927.00 If you have any questions concerning this quotation, please contact me at the number noted above. Approved By: Date: THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS! Product Details r -, &Aqd 1-11 111111 Page 2 of 4 Power and precision in a small package — Woods AlitecTM Cold Planers Specifications .:" Hydraulic flow classification high -flow Working width 16" (406.4 mm) Depth of cot 0 -6' (0 -152.4 mm) Number of teeth 44 Side shift (right) 0 -22" (0 -558.8 mm) Tilt +/- 15° Hydraulic flow requirement 22 - 32 gpm (83 - 121 Ipm) Hydraulic pressure requirement 2,000 -3,500 psi 138 -241 bar) Operating weight 1,750 lbs (795 kg) Depth control mechanism mechanical Tilt control mechanism hydraulic Side shift mechanism hydraulic Hydraulic function activation means manual or electric http:// www. woodsequipment .com/productDctails.aspx ?id =187 10/31/2016 City Council Agenda: 11/14/16 2F. Consideration to approve a quit claim deed for parcel 155- 185 - 001011 to FRHP Lincolnshire, LLP in consideration of a sum of $5,880.00. (AS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to approve a quit claim deed from the City of Monticello to FRHP Lincolnshire, LLP for a parcel of property located north of the intersection of 90th Street and Chelsea Road West, directly adjacent to parcels currently owned by FRHP Lincolnshire, LLP. The majority of the parcel was formerly Chelsea Court, vacated with the realignment of Chelsea Road. The parcel is shown to be owned by the City of Monticello according to Wright County Beacon information. The purchaser has agreed to the amount of $5,880 for the quit claim deed, and is responsible for costs associated with the preparation of the deed and its recording. This includes completion of title commitment and its review by the City Attorney. Preliminary title information has been provided, however a title commitment is being prepared by Camping World. Approval of this item is therefore subject to final review by the City Attorney and satisfaction of any comments of the City Attorney as to the title commitment and quit claim deed. The parcel of property, which is approximately .27 acres, is a low -lying area proposed to be used for stormwater management for the adjacent site, a proposed Camping World. The parcel is difficult to develop unless combined with additional land area, such as the Camping World proposal, given the following factors: • Setback requirements for the zoning of the parcel (B -3, Highway Business) • Site topography • Parcel location relative to the intersection of 90th and Chelsea, particularly as related to access • Intervening strip of City property to the west Should the Council approve the quit claim deed and the land use requests of FRHP Lincolnshire, LLP as related to the proposed Camping World, it is also required that this parcel be combined with the other parcel within the proposed plat. Al. Budget Impact: The $5,880 in proceeds from the transfer of the property by quit claim deed will go to the City's General Fund. FRHP Lincolnshire is to assume the other costs associated with the preparation, review and recording of the deed itself. FRHP Lincolnshire will also be responsible for applicable trunk charges for the parcel, estimated at approximately $2,500. A2. Staff Impact: Staff impact included a review of parcel history and site configuration, as well as discussions with FRHP Lincolnshire as related to the quit claim deed. Total staff time to date is estimated at approximately 3 hours in total, not including consulting time. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: City Council Agenda: 11/14/16 Motion to approve a quit claim deed for parcel 155 -185- 001011 to FRHP Lincolnshire, LLP in consideration of a sum of $5,880.00, contingent upon payment by FRHP Lincolnshire of all costs associated with the preparation, review and recording of the deed, payment of applicable trunk area charges, and platting of the parcel with the proposed Camping World First Addition, and subject to final review by the City Attorney and satisfaction of any comments as to the title commitment and quit claim deed. 2. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative #1 above. Given the site constraints associated with the small parcel, the proposed combination of the parcel with the adjacent property represents one of the most feasible uses of the parcel. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Quit Claim Deed B. Aerial, Subject Parcel eCRV Number: Deed Tax Due QUIT CLAIM DEED Date: .2016 FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, "Grantor," hereby conveys and quitclaims to FRHP LINCOLNSHIRE, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, "Grantee," real property in Wright County, Minnesota, described as follows: See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof; Check here if part or all of the land is Registered (Torrens) ❑ Together with all hereditaments and appurtenances. Check applicable box: ❑ The Seller certifies that the Seller does not know of any wells on the described real property. ❑ A well disclosure certificate accompanies this document or has been electronically filed. (If electronically filed, insert WDC number: ❑ I am familiar with the property described in this instrument and I certify that the status and number of wells on the described real property have not changed since the last previously filed well disclosure certificate. CITY OF MONTICELLO, a Minnesota municipal corporation STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT) Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by Brian Stumpf and by Jeff O'Neill, respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Monticello, a Minesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. (Stamp) (signature of notarial officer) Title (and Rank): My commission expires: (month/day /year) THIS INSTRUMENT WAS PREPARED BY: TAX STATEMENTS FOR THE REAL PROPERTY 2 DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE SENT TO: Brent Moody Accounting Department FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC 250 Parkway Drive, Suite 270 250 Parkway Drive, Suite 270 Lincolnshire, IL 60069 Lincolnshire, IL 60069 Exhibit A Legal Description (FULL LEGAL TO BE INSERTED) Sect -10 Twp -121 Range -025 90TH STREET 3RD ADDN Block -001 TH PRT OF LT 1 BLK 1 VM LIES SWLY OF THE NELY BDRY LN OF VACATED CHELSEA COURT AS DEDICATED IN 90TH STREET ADD I r✓ If, "J'hr Beaco 1 Wright County, MN Ilk 155171001010 55171 4 ` 15 51 S5 lfol: 01 a 151 ft Parcel ID 155185001011 Sec/Twp /Rng 10- 121 -025 Property Address District Brief Tax Description Date created: 11/7 /2016 Last Data Uploaded: 11/7/2016 2:42:55 AM Developed by Schneider The Schneider Corporation 15512800 lbl 0" 155185001.010 Overview Legend Roads CSAHCL CTYCL MUNICL — PRIVATECL — TWPCL Highways Interstate — State Hwy US Hwy City/Township Limits ❑ c El t ❑� Parcels Alternate ID n/a Owner Address CITY OFMONTICELLO Class 958- MUNICIPAL PUBLIC SERVICE -OTHER 505 WALNUT STSTE 1 Acreage n/a MONTICELLO, MN 55362 n/a Sect -10Twp -121 Range -025 90TH STREET3RD ADDN Block -001 TH PRTOF LT 1 BLK 1 WH LIES SWLY OFTHE NELY BDRY LN OF VACATED CHELSEA COURTAS DEDICATED IN 90TH STREETADD (Note: Not to be used on legal documents) City Council Agenda: 11/14/16 2G. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2016 -085 accepting improvements and authorizing final payment for the School Boulevard /Fallon Avenue and 85th Street Improvements, City Proiect No. 14C003 (SB) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: This project included street and pathway improvements along School Boulevard, 85th Street and Fallon Avenue. The project was substantially complete in the summer of 2015 with final punch list items complete this past summer. Final acceptance and payment had been withheld until the contractor had signed off on the final contract amount and submitted their final paper work, which they just completed recently. The Council is being requested to accept the project as complete and approve final payment to Knife River, Corp. in the amount of $37,446.80. The final payment request represents the final quantities completed on the contract and the release of the retainage on the contract. The final construction cost totaled $737,821.05. The original contract amount was $863,559.10 reflecting a $125,738.05 reduction in the construction cost. This reduction is primarily due to two items: subgrade corrections were not encountered during construction and a smaller depth of pavement needing to be milled and replaced to maintain drainage. All punch list items assembled for this project have been completed, and WSB & Associates, Inc. is indicating the project is complete and ready for final payment in accordance with the contract and City of Monticello Engineering and Construction Standards. The following paperwork was recently been submitted for final payment to be released: 1. Satisfactory showing that the contractor has complied with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 290.92 requiring withholding state income tax (IC 134 forms). 2. Evidence in the form of an affidavit that all claims against the contractor by reasons of the contract have been fully paid or satisfactorily secured (lien waivers). 3. Consent of Surety to Final Payment certification from the contractor's surety. 4. Two -year maintenance bond. It should be noted that the maintenance bond will start and extend two years from the date of final acceptance of the project by the City Council. A.1 Budget Impact: As noted above, the final payment due to Knife River, Corp. is $37,446.80. City Council Agenda: 11/14/16 Funding sources for the proposed improvements included special assessments to the school district, Municipal State Aid and the Series 2015B bond issue to finance the project. A.2 Staff Impact: Impacts to staff workload will be minimal and routine for the project. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2016 -085 accepting improvements and authorizing final payment to Knife River, Corp. for the School Boulevard/Fallon Avenue and 85th Street Improvements, City Project No. 14C003 2. Motion to deny adoption of City Resolution 2016 -085 at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternate No. 1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2016 -085 B. Letter of recommendation C. Construction Pay Voucher No. 4 (Final) CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-085 ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT TO KNIFE RIVER CORP. FOR THE SCHOOL BOULEVARD, 85TH STREET AND FALLON AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS, CITY PROJECT NO. 14CO03 WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract with the City of Monticello, on June 8, 2015, Knife River, Corp. was awarded, by low bid, for the School Boulevard, 85th Street Improvements, City Project No. 14C003; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL VED BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA that the work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and approved and that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby directed to issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract subject to receipt of the following: 1) Satisfactory showing that the contractor has complied with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 290.92 requiring withholding state income tax (IC 134); 2) Evidence in the form of an affidavit that all claims against the contractor by reasons of the contract have been fully paid or satisfactorily secured (lien waivers); 3) Consent of Surety to Final Payment certification from the contractor's surety; 4) Two year maintenance bond to extend two years from the date of acceptance of the project by the City Council. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 14th day of November, 2016. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk A WSB �M 701 Xenia Avenue South I Suite 300 1 Minneapolis, MN 55416 1 (763) 541 -48000 November 9, 2016 Ms. Jennifer Schreiber City Clerk City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Construction Pay Voucher No. 4 (Final) and Final Project Documents School Boulevard /Fallon Avenue and 85th Street Improvements City of Monticello Project No. 14CO03 S.A.P. 222 - 105 -002 WSB Projects No. 1494 -96 and 1494 -97 Dear Ms. Schreiber: Please find enclosed Construction Pay Voucher No. 4 and final (in triplicate) in the amount of $37,446.80 for the above - referenced project. The final payment request represents the final quantities completed on the contract and the release of the retainage. We recommend that the City of Monticello approve Construction Pay Voucher No. 4 and final for Knife River Corporation — North Central at the November 14, 2016, City Council meeting. Enclosed is the documentation required for releasing final payment for the above - referenced project as listed below: 1. Satisfactory showing that the contractor has complied with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 290.92 requiring withholding state income tax (IC134 forms). 2. Evidence in the form of an affidavit that all claims against the contractor by reasons of the contract have been fully paid or satisfactorily secured (lien waivers). 3. Consent of Surety to Final Payment certification from the contractor's surety. 4. Two -year maintenance bond. This project will be considered for acceptance by the City Council on November 14, 2016. The maintenance period will be in effect from November 14, 2016, until November 14, 2018. Please contact me at (763) 512 -5257 if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Eric M. Eckman, PE Project Manager Enclosures cc: Wayne Oberg, City of Monticello Shibani Bisson, WSB & Associates, Inc. Andy Hicks, Knife River Corporation — North Central srb 0 Building a legacy —your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com0 K:101494- 9601AdminlConstruction AdminlPay Vouchers11494 -96 &97 CST LTR VO 4 FNL CTYj schmiber-110916.do CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362 -1147 Project 01494 -96 - MONT- School Blvd Street and Trail Improvements Final Pay Voucher No. 4 Contractor: Knife River 4787 Shadow Wood Drive NE Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 ContraceAmounts Original Contract $863,559.10 Contract Changes $0.00 Revised Contract $863,559.10 WorkcCertifiedcrocDate Base Bid Items $737,821.05 Backsheet $0.00 Change Order $0.00 Supplemental Agreement $0.00 Work Order $0.00 Material On Hand $0.00 Total $737,821.05 Contract No. Vendor No. For Period: 7/26/2016 - 10/24/2016 Warrant # Date FundscEncumbered Original $863,559.10 Additional N/A Total $863,559.10 I hereby certify that a Final Examination has been made of the noted Contract, that the Contract has been completed, that the entire amount of Work Shown in this Final Voucher has been performed and the Total Value of the Work Performed in accordance with, and pursuant to, the terms of the Contract is as shown in this Final Voucher. Approved By County /City /Project Engineer October 27, 2016 Date Construction Observer Date Approved By Knife River Contractor Date City of Monticello Date Page 1 Work ertified ThiscPaycvoucher Work ertified TocDate Less Amount Retained Less Previous Payments Amount aid ThiscPaycVoucher Total Amount PaidcrocDate 01494 -96 $585.00 $737,821.05 $0.00 $700,374.25 $37,446.80 $737,821.05 Percent Retained: 0% Amount aid his inal ay oucher $37,446.80 I hereby certify that a Final Examination has been made of the noted Contract, that the Contract has been completed, that the entire amount of Work Shown in this Final Voucher has been performed and the Total Value of the Work Performed in accordance with, and pursuant to, the terms of the Contract is as shown in this Final Voucher. Approved By County /City /Project Engineer October 27, 2016 Date Construction Observer Date Approved By Knife River Contractor Date City of Monticello Date Page 1 CITYcOF'MONTICELLO 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362 -1147 Project No. 01494 -96 Final Pay Voucher No. 4 No. Fromcbate Tocbate Work - Certified PercPaycyoucher Amount Retained PercPaycVoucher Amount"Paid PercPaycyoucher 1 07/16/2015 08/13/2015 $244,218.70 $12,210.94 $232,007.76 2 08/14/2015 09/21/2015 $450,199.00 $22,509.95 $427,689.05 3 09/22/2015 07/25/2016 $42,818.35 $2,140.91 $40,677.44 4 07/26/2016 10/24/2016 $585.00 ($36,861.80) $37,446.80 Totals: $737,821.05 $0.00 $737,821.05 01494- 96CFundi nac+CateaorvChwort Funding Work Less Less Amount Paid Total Category Certified Amount Previous This Amoun&aid No. Tocbate Retained Payments Paycvoucher Tocbate 001 463,568.09 0.00 439,833.94 23,734.15 463,568.09 002 274,252.95 0.00 260,540.30 13,712.65 274,252.95 Totals: $737,821.04 $0.00 $700,374.24 $37,446.80 $737,821.04 01494- 96%ndingcSourgg5 eport Accounting Funding Amount aid Revised Funds Paid o No. Source This Paycvoucher Contract Amount Encumbered Tocbate Contractor Tocbate 1 MSA /Local Roadway 23,734.15 557,508.00 557,508.00 463,568.09 2 Local 13,712.65 306,051.10 306,051.10 274,252.95 Totals: $37,446.80 $863,559.10 $863,559.10 $737,821.04 Page 2 CITYcOF'MONTICELLO 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362 -1147 Project No. 01494 -96 Final Pay Voucher No. 4 01494- 96CProjectcMateriAtatus Quantityc Amountc Line Item Description Units UnitcPrice Contract This This c Quantity Amount Quantity Pay Pay TocDate TocDate Voucher Voucher SCHEDUL A: CHOOL LVDc 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS $12,500.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $12,500.00 REMOVE 2 2104.501 CONCRETE LIN $2.50 770 0 $0.00 832 $2,080.00 CURB AND FT GUTTER REMOVE 3 2104.503 CONCRETE S F $1.85 900 0 $0.00 51 $94.35 WALK REMOVE 4 2104.503 BITUMINOUS S F $1.00 2750 0 $0.00 500 $500.00 PAVEMENT REMOVE 5 2104.505 CONCRETE S Y $10.00 10 0 $0.00 4.3 $43.00 PAVEMENT 6 2104.509 REMOVE SIGN EACH $25.00 70 0 $0.00 70 $1,750.00 SAWING 7 2104.513 BITUMINOUS L F $2.75 170 0 $0.00 999.5 $2,748.63 PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) 8 2105.501 COMMON C Y $10.00 900 0 $0.00 377.8 $3,778.00 EXCAVATION 9 2211.501 AGGREGATE TON $22.00 310 0 $0.00 70.7 $1,555.40 BASE CLASS 5 10 2215.501 FULL DEPTH S Y $5.00 3109 0 $0.00 3070.2 $15,351.00 RECLAMATION MILL 11 2232.501 BITUMINOUS S Y $1.45 30800 0 $0.00 30800 $44,660.00 SURFACE (2.0 ") BITUMINOUS 12 2357.502 MATERIAL FOR GAL $1.00 3095 0 $0.00 1450 $1,450.00 TACK COAT TYPE SP 9.5 13 2360.501 WEARING TON $60.00 4235 0 $0.00 3300 $198,000.00 COURSE MIX (4,B) TYPE SP 12.5 14 2360.502 NON WEAR TON $65.00 490 0 $0.00 22 $1,430.00 COURSE MIX (4,B) TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING 15 2360.503 COURSE Yo $12.00 3350 0 $0.00 2965.5 $35,586.00 MIXTURE (2,B) 3.0" THICK 16 2504.602 BOX ST VALVE EACH $275.00 6 1 $275.00 3 $825.00 Page 3 CITYcOF'MONTICELLO 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362 -1147 Project No. 01494 -96 Final Pay Voucher No. 4 01494- 96CProjectcMateriAtatus Quantityc Amountc Line Item Description Units UnitcPrice Contract This This c Quantity Amount Quantity Pay Pay TocDate TocDate Voucher Voucher ADJUST FRAME 17 2506.522 & RING EACH $310.00 20 0 $0.00 4 $1,240.00 CASTING (STORM) ADJUST FRAME 18 2506.522 & RING EACH $310.00 4 1 $310.00 1 $310.00 CASTING (SANITARY) 19 2521.501 6" CONCRETE S F $6.00 665 0 $0.00 1670.4 $10,022.40 WALK CONCRETE 20 2531.501 CURB & L F $19.95 160 0 $0.00 160 $3,192.00 GUTTER DESIGN B612 CONCRETE 21 2531.501 CURB & L F $26.00 570 0 $0.00 1035 $26,910.00 GUTTER DESIGN B618 7" CONCRETE 22 2531.604 VALLEY Yo $81.00 20 0 $0.00 17.7 $1,433.70 GUTTER ADA 23 2531.618 COMPLIANCE LS $1,500.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $1,500.00 SUPERVISOR 24 2531.618 TRUNCATED SF $35.00 144 0 $0.00 168 $5,880.00 DOMES 25 2563.601 TRAFFIC LS $8,000.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $8,000.00 CONTROL 26 2564.531 SIGN PANELS SF $30.50 543 0 $0.00 531.05 $16,197.03 TYPE C 27 2564.537 INSTALL SIGN EACH $250.00 12 0 $0.00 12 $3,000.00 TYPE D DECIDUOUS 28 2571.502 TREE 2.5" CAL TREE $425.00 31 0 $0.00 29 $12,325.00 B &B 29 2573.502 SILT FENCE, L F $1.75 500 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 TYPE MS STORM DRAIN 30 2573.530 INLET EACH $95.00 25 0 $0.00 25 $2,375.00 PROTECTION SEDIMENT 31 2573.533 CONTROL LOG L F $3.00 200 0 $0.00 380 $1,140.00 TYPE WOOD FIBER 32 2575.523 EROSION S Y $3.00 50 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 CONTROL BLANKETS Page 4 CITYcOF'MONTICELLO 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362 -1147 Project No. 01494 -96 Final Pay Voucher No. 4 01494- 96CProjectcMateriAtatus Quantityc Amountc Line Item Description Units UnitcPrice Contract This This c Quantity Amount Quantity Pay Pay TocDate TocDate Voucher Voucher CATEGORY HYDRAULIC 33 2575.563 MATRIX TYPE S Y $1.45 3850 0 $0.00 2100 $3,045.00 MULCH 34 2575.603 ROOT BARRIER L F $12.00 350 0 $0.00 358 $4,296.00 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (LEFT 35 2582.501 ARROW) POLY EACH $455.00 1 0 $0.00 17 $7,735.00 PREFORM - GROUND IN PAVEMENT MESSAGE 36 2582.501 (RIGHT ARROW) EACH $455.00 16 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 POLY PREFORM - GROUND IN 37 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE L F $0.32 13250 0 $0.00 13045 $4,174.40 WHITE -EPDXY 38 2582.502 12" SOLID LINE L F $7.60 275 0 $0.00 142 $1,079.20 WHITE -EPDXY 39 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE L F $0.32 1400 0 $0.00 1206.4 $386.05 YELLOW -EPDXY 40 2582.502 24" SOLID LINE L F $8.50 1700 0 $0.00 927 $7,879.50 YELLOW -EPDXY 41 2582.502 4" BROKEN LINE L F $0.32 300 0 $0.00 240 $76.80 YELLOW -EPDXY 4" DOUBLE 42 2582.502 SOLID LINE L F $0.64 7300 0 $0.00 7594.2 $4,860.29 YELLOW -EPDXY CROSSWALK 43 2582.503 MARKING -POLY SF $15.50 1504 0 $0.00 1926 $29,853.00 PREFORM -GR IN Totalsc ForcSectioncSCHEDULE cA:cSCHOOLcBLVD: 1 $585.00 1 $479,261.75 SCHEDULEcB:c FALLONc AVENUeFB5THcSTREETSMPROVEMENTSc (EISLeAVEcrOcFARMSTEADcAVE)c 44 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS $6,000.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $6,000.00 45 2104.509 REMOVE SIGN EACH $25.00 13 0 $0.00 13 $325.00 SALVAGE & 46 2104.523 REINSTALL EACH $125.00 2 0 $0.00 2 $250.00 SIGN 47 2211.501 AGGREGATE TON $22.00 50 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 BASE CLASS 5 AGGREGATE 48 2221.501 SHOULDERING TON $36.00 140 0 $0.00 160.61 $5,781.96 CLASS 2 MILL Page 5 CITYcOF'MONTICELLO 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362 -1147 Project No. 01494 -96 Final Pay Voucher No. 4 01494- 96CProjectcMateriAtatus Quantityc Amountc Line Item Description Units UnitcPrice Contract This This c Quantity Amount Quantity Pay Pay TocDate TocDate Voucher Voucher BITUMINOUS 49 2232.501 STEP JOINT L F $5.00 110 0 $0.00 297.4 $1,487.00 (1.5 ") BITUMINOUS 50 2357.502 MATERIAL FOR GAL $2.50 672 0 $0.00 200 $500.00 TACK COAT TYPE SP 9.5 51 2360.501 WEARING TON $60.00 554 0 $0.00 566.78 $34,006.80 COURSE MIX (2,B) 52 2501.515 15" RC PIPE EACH $650.00 2 0 $0.00 2 $1,300.00 APRON TRASH GUARD 53 2501.602 FOR 15" PIPE EACH $600.00 2 0 $0.00 2 $1,200.00 APRON 15" RC PIPE 54 2503.541 SEWER DESIGN FT $47.00 40 0 $0.00 40 $1,880.00 3006 CLASS V 55 2563.601 TRAFFIC LS $1,000.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $1,000.00 CONTROL 56 2564.531 SIGN PANELS SF $30.50 67 0 $0.00 67 $2,043.50 TYPE C 57 2564.537 INSTALL SIGN EACH $250.00 6 0 $0.00 6 $1,500.00 TYPE D 58 2573.502 SILT FENCE, L F $1.75 3336 0 $0.00 192 $336.00 TYPE MS SEDIMENT 59 2573.533 CONTROL LOG L F $3.00 100 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 TYPE WOOD FIBER EROSION 60 2575.523 CONTROL S Y $3.00 300 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 BLANKETS CATEGORY 3 HYDRAULIC 61 2575.563 MATRIX TYPE S Y $1.45 500 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 MULCH 4" DOUBLE 62 2582.502 SOLID LINE L F $0.64 2020 0 $0.00 2184 $1,397.76 YELLOW -EPDXY Totals or ection CHEDULE ALLON AVENUE 5TH STREETc1M PROVE MENTSc (EISLEcAVEcTOrFARMSTEADcAVE): $0.00 $59,008.02 SCHEDULEcC:% 5THcSTREETSMPROVEMENTSc( BETWEENcTHc25cANDcEDMONSONcAVE )c 63 2130.501 WATER MGAL $80.00 10 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 64 2211.501 AGGREGATE TON $22.00 50 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 BASE CLASS 5 Page 6 CITYcOF'MONTICELLO 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362 -1147 Project No. 01494 -96 Final Pay Voucher No. 4 01494- 96CProjectcMateriAtatus Quantityc Amountc Line Item Description Units UnitcPrice Contract This This c Quantity Amount Quantity Pay Pay TocDate TocDate Voucher Voucher 65 2215.501 FULL DEPTH S Y $4.50 4177 0 $0.00 4111.5 $18,501.75 RECLAMATION AGGREGATE 66 2221.501 SHOULDERING TON $36.00 170 0 $0.00 159.72 $5,749.92 CLASS 2 MILL 67 2232.501 BITUMINOUS L F $5.00 50 0 $0.00 44 $220.00 STEP JOINT (1.5 ") BITUMINOUS 68 2357.502 MATERIAL FOR GAL $2.50 571 0 $0.00 210 $525.00 TACK COAT TYPE SP 9.5 69 2360.501 WEARING TON $58.00 846 0 $0.00 775.09 $44,955.22 COURSE MIX (2,B) TYPE SP 12.5 70 2360.502 NON WEAR TON $60.00 541 0 $0.00 509.95 $30,597.00 COURSE MIX (2,B) 71 2563.601 TRAFFIC LS $1,000.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $1,000.00 CONTROL 72 2564.531 SIGN PANELS S F $30.50 16 0 $0.00 16 $488.00 TYPE C 73 2573.502 SILT FENCE, L F $1.75 6000 0 $0.00 3409 $5,965.75 TYPE MS SEDIMENT 74 2573.533 CONTROL LOG L F $3.00 100 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 TYPE WOOD FIBER EROSION 75 2575.523 CONTROL S Y $3.00 300 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 BLANKETS CATEGORY 3 HYDRAULIC 76 2575.563 MATRIX TYPE S Y $1.45 2000 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 MULCH 77 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE L F $0.32 2120 0 $0.00 2086 $667.52 YELLOW -EPDXY 78 2582.502 4" BROKEN LINE L F $0.32 620 0 $0.00 600 $192.00 YELLOW -EPDXY TotalscFor%ection%CHE DULEcC:%5TH% GREET IM PROVE MENTSc(BETWEENcrHr25 ANADMONSON AVE): $0.00 $108,862.16 SCHEDULEcD :c'FALLONcAVEcPATHWAYcEXTENSIONc SAWING 79 2104.511 CONCRETE L F $10.00 5 0 $0.00 16.6 $166.00 PAVEMENT Page 7 CITYcOF'MONTICELLO 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362 -1147 Project No. 01494 -96 Final Pay Voucher No. 4 01494- 96CProjectcMateriAtatus Quantityc Amountc Line Item Description Units UnitcPrice Contract This This c Quantity Amount Quantity Pay Pay TocDate TocDate Voucher Voucher (FULL DEPTH) SAWING 80 2104.513 BITUMINOUS L F $2.50 500 0 $0.00 506 $1,265.00 PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) 81 2105.501 COMMON C Y $15.00 100 0 $0.00 190 $2,850.00 EXCAVATION 82 2105.507 SUBGRADE C Y $10.00 420 0 $0.00 496.3 $4,963.00 EXCAVATION SELECT 83 2105.522 GRANULAR C Y $15.00 420 0 $0.00 507.7 $7,615.50 BORROW (CV) 84 2105.523 BORROW $15.00 700 0 $0.00 748.1 $11,221.50 (CV) YD 85 2211.501 AGGREGATE TON $22.00 500 0 $0.00 211.16 $4,645.52 BASE CLASS 5 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING 86 2360.503 COURSE YD $12.00 1300 0 $0.00 1300 $15,600.00 MIXTURE (2,B) 2.5" THICK TYPE SP 9.5 BIT 87 2360.505 MIXTURE FOR TON $75.00 40 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 PATCHING 88 2501.515 12" RC PIPE EACH $568.00 1 0 $0.00 2 $1,136.00 APRON TRASH GUARD 89 2501.602 FOR 12" PIPE EACH $531.00 1 0 $0.00 2 $1,062.00 APRON 12" RC PIPE 90 2503.541 SEWER DES L F $37.50 260 0 $0.00 293 $10,987.50 3006 CL V CONNECT TO 91 2503.541 EXISTING EACH $500.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $500.00 STORM SEWER CONST 92 2506.501 DRAINAGE L F $320.00 7.5 0 $0.00 6 $1,920.00 STRUCTURE DES 48 -4020 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE 93 2506.501 STRUCTURE EACH $1,200.00 1 0 $0.00 3 $3,600.00 DESIGN SPECIAL 1 94 2506.502 CONST DRAINAGE EACH $1,530.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $1,530.00 STRUCTURE Page 8 CITYcOF'MONTICELLO 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362 -1147 Project No. 01494 -96 Final Pay Voucher No. 4 01494- 96CProjectcMateriAtatus Quantityc Amountc Line Item Description Units UnitcPrice Contract This This c Quantity Amount Quantity Pay Pay TocDate TocDate Voucher Voucher DESIGN G CASTING 95 2506.516 ASSEMBLY EACH $500.00 1 0 $0.00 3 $1,500.00 (STORM) 96 2511.515 GEOTEXTILE S Y $2.50 167 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 FILTER TYPE V 97 2521.501 4" CONCRETE S F $5.00 168 0 $0.00 263.5 $1,317.50 WALK 98 2521.501 6" CONCRETE S F $6.00 130 0 $0.00 132.2 $793.20 WALK CONCRETE 99 2531.501 CURB & L F $25.00 425 0 $0.00 425 $10,625.00 GUTTER DESIGN B618 ADA 100 2531.618 COMPLIANCE LS $1,500.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $1,500.00 SUPERVISOR 101 2531.618 TRUNCATED SF $35.00 36 0 $0.00 32 $1,120.00 DOMES 102 2563.601 TRAFFIC LS $500.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $500.00 CONTROL 103 2573.502 SILT FENCE, L F $1.75 1300 0 $0.00 1132 $1,981.00 TYPE MS STORM DRAIN 104 2573.530 INLET EACH $95.00 2 0 $0.00 2 $190.00 PROTECTION EROSION 105 2575.523 CONTROL S Y $3.00 500 0 $0.00 124 $372.00 BLANKETS CATEGORY HYDRAULIC 106 2575.563 MATRIX TYPE S Y $1.45 2000 0 $0.00 1192 $1,728.40 MULCH TotalscForcSCHEDULEcD :'FALLONcAVEcPATHWAYcEXTENSION: $0.00 $90,689.12 Project otals: $585.00 $737,821.05 Page 9 City Council Agenda: 11/14/16 2H. Consideration of approving an assessment with Mosbart Properties LLC for the 2016 Street Reconstruction Project, City Project No. 15CO01 (SB) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Mosbart Properties, LLC owns the undeveloped property located at 213 3rd Street East, just south of the Peterson - Grismo funeral chapel. Prior to the assessment hearing on October 24, 2016 for the project, Mr. Bob Mosford had contacted City staff with questions on the assessment for the property. The property is zoned non - residential or commercial based on the Wright County tax classification and staff indicated to Mr. Mosford that was how the property was proposed to be assessed. Mr. Mosford indicated in an email dated October 21, 2016 that the property has only ever been used as residential, has no structure on it, and to apply the commercial rate to it was inconsistent with its utilization. Mr. Mosford was contacted on October 24, 2016 to discuss the assessment but was unavailable. On October 28, 2016, Mr. Mosford contacted City staff again questioning the assessment. The City attorney was consulted and indicated that staff should treat Mr. Mosford's email as an objection to the assessment on the property. Staff met with Mr. Mosford and Mr. Leon Barthel on November 8, 2016 to discuss the property assessment. The following items were discussed: • The property's class is 233- (non- homestead) commercial land and building based on Wright County property classification for tax purposes • The property is zoned in the CCD and could develop as residential or commercial. The entire block the property is located on is zoned CCD with residential uses to the south and easterly blocks. • The property is 122 feet wide by 165 feet deep or 0.46 acres and could be developed as a 6 to 8 unit apartment building or a commercial type building or a duplex or even a single family home. The highest and best use of the property likely would not be a single - family home. • Mosbart Properties has no immediate plans to develop the property as they have not been actively marketing it or had any prospects. The property was purchased from the City in 2000 and was part of the old City Hall. Mosbart's plans at the time was to combine the property with the adjacent property to the east and develop the properties as a multi - family or apartment building. • The City Council adopted the assessment roll with an assessment of $10,614 based on the non - residential rate of $87 /front foot x 122 feet. If the property developed as anything more intense than a single - family home or duplex, the non- residential rate and $10,614 would still apply. • Mosbart Properties is requesting to be assessed the single - family residential rate City Council Agenda: 11/14/16 of $4,500 at this time, since that had been the previous use, with the remaining $6,114 (which is $10,614- $4,500), deferred if the property develops into a multi- family or commercial use. Given the above factors, staff is recommending that the Council consider approving a deferred assessment agreement at this time. The property is undeveloped and is in a transition zone for residential and commercial uses. The Council has approved deferred assessment agreements in the past if a property intensifies it use. The proposal by Mosbart Properties is fair and they acknowledge the benefit received by the project improvement. The proposed terms of the agreement are as follows: • The property will be assessed the single family residential rate of $4500 as part of the 2016 Street Reconstruction assessment certification to the County for collection starting with 2017 taxes. The Council adopted assessment term is 10 years with 4% interest calculated from the date of the adoption of the assessment roll on October 24,2016 A deferred assessment including interest (starting October 24, 2016) will apply to the property until development (building permit application) or 10 years from the date of the agreement, whichever occurs first. The deferred assessment rates are as follows based on what the property develops if developed before 10 years: • Two - family residential dwelling= additional $4,500 assessment • Multi- family dwellings defined as three or more dwellings or non- residential use= $6,114 assessment, which is calculated by $87 per front foot x 122 feet minus the $4500 assessed single family rate. The assessment agreement would be recorded against the property to track the deferred assessment. At the time of building permit or land use application, the deferred assessment would be paid. If after 10 years the property does not develop, the deferred assessment of $6,114.00 will be paid by the property owner. The City clerk will track and certify the deferred assessment of $6,114.00 to the County. If the Council does not approve the agreement, Mosbart Properties could still serve notice to the City and file an appeal with Wright County District Court by November 23, 2016, which is within 30 days after the assessment hearing, as required by statute. The legal process would then take over. Al. Budget Impact: Deferring $6,114.00 does not pose a significant impact to the project budget. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Impacts to staff workload were minimal for this request. City Council Agenda: 11/14/16 A. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approving an assessment agreement with Mosbart Properties, LLC for the 2016 Street Reconstruction Project, City Project 15C00L 2. Motion to deny approval at this time B. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends approving Alternative #1 for the reasons stated in the report. C. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Property Map B. Draft assessment agreement 213 3rd StE November 9, 2011 City Boundary rll It aiv or Monticello 1 inch = 94 feet Bryan Pittman Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES /Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Map Powered by DataLink from WSB & Associates (Reserved for recording) PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement ") made this day of , 2016, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and MOSBART PROPERTIES, LLC ( "Property Owner "). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of property having a street address of 213 Third Street East, Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Subject Property "). The Subject Property is vacant and zoned in the Central Community District (CCD), which means the Subject Property can be developed either residential or commercial. The Property Owner asserts its former use was single family residential. B. In connection with the City's 2016 Street Reconstruction Project (City project 15C001) ( "Public Improvement "), the Property Owner is required to pay the City an assessment for the Public Improvement. C. Given the speculation of the potential use of the Subject Property, and in order to avoid an appeal of the special assessment, the Property Owner and City desire to enter into this Agreement, and Property Owner has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property as outlined below. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS AND OBLIGATIONS HEREIN SET FORTH, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1 19oo6svi 1. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property based on its former use as a single family residential lot. The special assessment shall be deemed adopted on the date this Agreement has been signed by all parties. The Subject Property shall be immediately assessed at a single family residential rate of Four Thousand Five Hundred and no /100ths Dollars ($4,500.00). The assessment term shall be spread over a ten (10) year period in equal annual installments, together with interest at the rate of four (4 %) percent per year on the unpaid balance, calculated from the date of the adoption of the assessment roll on October 24, 2106. The first installment shall be payable with taxes paid in 2017. 2. DEFERRED ASSESSMENT. A deferred assessment with principal and interest will apply to the Subject Property until Owner develops the Subject Property, or ten (10) years from the date of this Agreement, whichever occurs first. The deferred assessment rates are as follows based on how the Subject Property is developed at the time of building permit submittal to the City as follows: If the Subject Property develops as two (2) family residential dwellings, an additional $4,500.00 plus interest accrued starting on October 24, 2016 will be due to the City at the time of building permit submittal. or If the Subject Property develops as multi - family dwellings, defined as three or more dwellings or a non - residential, commercial or industrial use, an additional $6,114.00, which is calculated by $87.00 per front foot x 122 feet minus the $4,500.00 assessed single family rate, plus interest accrued starting on October 24, 2016 will be due to the City at the time of building permit submittal. or If the Subject Property does not develop within 10 years from the date of this Agreement, $6,114.00 plus interest accrued starting on October 24, 2016 will be due to the City by October 24, 2026. 3. WAIVER. Property Owner, their successors and assigns, waive any and all procedural and substantive objections to the Public Improvements and special assessment, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 4. RELEASE. Property Owner, their successors and assigns, hereby unconditionally release and forever discharge the City, its elected officials, employees, agents and insurers from any and all claims and causes of action of whatever kind or nature that is in any way connected with or related to the Public Improvements. 2 19oo6avi 5. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon Property Owner and Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. Remainder ofpage intentionally left blank. Signatures on the following pages. 19oo6avi CITY OF MONTICELLO 0 Brian Stumpf, Mayor And: Jennifer M. Schreiber, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by Brian Stumpf and by Jennifer M. Schreiber, respectively the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public 4 19oo6avi PROPERTY OWNER: Robert Mosford MOSBART PROPERTIES, LLC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2016, by MOSBART PROPERTIES, LLC, Property Owner. Notary Public INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452 -5000 JJJ 5 190068vi EXHIBIT A [insert legal description] 19oo6svi City Council Agenda — 11/14/16 4A. Consideration of a reauest for Conditional Use Permit for vehicle sales and rental in a B -3 (Highway Business) and B -4 (Regional Business) District, a request for Conditional Use Permit for accessory use auto repair in a B -3 District, a request for Preliminary and Final Plat for Camping World 1St Addition, and a request for a zoning map amendment to consolidate the zoning designation on the two subject parcels to either a B -4 or a B -3 District. Applicant: FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC. Property: Legal: Lot 1, Block 1, 901h Street 2nd Addition and that part of Lot 1, Block 1 which lies Northeasterly of Vacated Chelsea Court as dedicated in the 90th Street Yd Addition PIDs: 155185001010, 155128001010, 155185001011 Address: 3801 Chelsea Road W Planning Case Number: 2016 -045 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Conditional Use Permit for Vehicle Sales and Rental, Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Vehicle Service, Preliminary (and Final) Plat for Camping World Addition, and rezoning to consolidate the zoning district in the new plat to a B -3 zoning district. Deadline for Decision: December 16th, 2016 Land Use Designation: Places to Shop Zoning Designation: B -4, Regional Business District for existing parcel, B -3, Highway Business District for expansion parcel The purpose of the `B -4" (Regional Business) district is to provide for the establishment of commercial and service activities which draw from and serve customers from the entire community or region. The purpose of the `B -3" (Highway Business) district is to provide for limited commercial and service activities and provide for and limit the establishment of motor vehicle oriented or dependent commercial and service activities. Overlays /Environmental NA Regulations Applicable: Current Site Use: Surrounding Land Uses: North: East: South: West: City Council Agenda — 11/14/16 Recreational vehicle sales, RV accessory sales, and RV service I -94 Automobile Dealership Vacant commercial land Motorsports Dealership Project Description: Occupy an existing RV dealership building, expand the sales facility to an adjoining vacant parcel, and refit the building for the sale and display of Recreational Vehicles and accessory retail sales and service. ANALYSIS Vehicle Sales and Rental is an allowed use in the B -4 Zoning District by Conditional Use Permit. The property was developed as an automobile dealership use, and later remodeled for recreational vehicle sales and service. The property developed under the B -3 zoning district, but was rezoned to B -4 at the time that Xcel Energy occupied the property under an office and training use. B -4 zoning predominates to the west of this site, and B -3 zoning predominates to the east and south. The applicants propose to make minimal changes to the property and building, primarily related to the interior of the building. The only visible changes to the exterior of the building relate to larger doors for use in the service area of the building. The primary change to the property will be the expansion of the sales /display area onto the 1.58 acre vacant parcel that is currently vacant. Finally, the applicants are seeking the acquisition of a third parcel, currently owned by the City of Monticello in the far southwest corner of the project site. This third parcel is approximately .27 acres and a vacated portion of former right of way, and will be used for stormwater treatment (primarily required infiltration area) for the expanded site. Rezoning The current 7.0 acre site (formerly occupied by Quality RV) has been zoned B -4, Regional Business, as noted above. The additional vacant 1.58 acre parcel to be added to the sales lot area is zoned B -3, Highway Business. The third parcel (the former vacated right of way) is also zoned B -3. Either zoning district would meet the tests for zoning district amendment in the Comprehensive Plan, and there are no particular transition issues to address as a result of a change to any of the parcels. The proposed zoning of the entire site to B -3, 2 City Council Agenda — 11/14/16 Highway Business, will accommodate the specifics of the proposed use, which include accessory vehicle service — an accessory use allowed in the B -3, but not in the B -4 District. Given the purpose statement for the B -3 district and the applicant's stated uses, the B -3 zoning district is appropriate for the use, and for the site in question. As such, the resolution is drafted for rezoning of Lot 1, Block 1, 90th Street Addition to B -3, with the other two smaller parcels retaining their B -3 designation. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning to include the entire subject property under the consistent B -3 zoning designation. Conditional Use Permit - Vehicle Sales or Rental Vehicle Sales and Rental is allowed by Conditional Use Permit in the B -3 (as well as the B -4) zoning district. The following standards apply to this CUP. (a) The minimum building size for any vehicle sales or rental use shall comply with the standards in Table 5 -3. Table 5 -3 requires that buildings on lots of 4 acres or more be at least 40,000 square feet or 15% of the lot area, whichever is greater. The Table also includes a clause (appearing to be a typographical error) that states that lots of 2 acres to "more than" four acres may have buildings covering a little as 10% of the lot. Staff Comment: After the lot combination (discussed later in this report) the subject site will be 8.58 acres in size. The existing building is 45,440 square feet, including mezzanine space based on previous file information. The existing building, with a coverage of 12.1 %, meets the 10% coverage standard, but not the 15% standard. Staff discovered this discrepancy during the review, but not until after the application was in process, too late to add notice of a hearing on a variance request to the November 1 Planning Commission date. The Planning Commission had two options to address this issue. The first is to proceed with the application under the actual reading of the code, which states that the building on a lot of more than 2 acres may cover little as 10% of the lot area. Under this interpretation, the proposal, even with the added land, is compliant with the literal reading of Table 5 -3. The Commission considered this aspect of the requirement, and agreed to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permits as submitted. The second option considered was to proceed with consideration of a variance to the 15% standard for buildings on lots of more than 4 acres. As noted at the Planning Commission meeting, it appears that this would be the intent (although not the literal reading) of Table 5 -3. The Planning Commission scheduled a public hearing to act on the variance prior to the City Council meeting on November 14. The applicant has made a separate application to consider this variance in the event the Commission believed it necessary. 3 City Council Agenda — 11/14/16 In a preliminary review of the potential variance application, the Planning Commission must find that there are unique conditions on the property that create a "practical difficulty" in putting the property to what would otherwise be considered a reasonable use. Staff believes that this test can be met, given the layout of site improvements (with a sales lot surrounding the proposed expansion area), acknowledging that separate use of the expansion 1.58 acre site would raise unique issues, among those being access problems for a stand -alone use from Chelsea Road due to the intersection location with 90th Street. In summary, the Planning Commission recommended the Conditional Use Permits as consistent with the literal reading of the ordinance, but also will be considering a formal variance to address the code's intent. (b) When abutting a residential use, the property shall be screened with an opaque buffer (Table 4 -2, Buffer Type "D ") in accordance with section 4.1(G) of this ordinance. Staff Comment: The site does not abut a residential district. (c) All lighting shall be in compliance with Section 4.4 of this ordinance. Staff Comment: The proposed site plan and photometric plan shows that all existing lighting will remain the same and no new lighting is proposed. The applicant should verify that new lighting will be able to meet the requirements of the code related to a maximum of 1.0 footcandles at the property line, and that all lighting sources will be downcast and now glare onto adjacent property or right of way. The photometric plans show a greater potential light spread, but notes that shielding can be added to meet the requirements. The height of the light fixtures is 22 feet, in compliance with the City's current maximum height of 25 feet. (d) The outside sales and display area shall be hard surfaced. Staff Comment: The existing sales and display area is paved. The new sales and display area is proposed to be hard surfaced with bituminous material, and surrounded by concrete curbing. (e) The outside sales and display area does not utilize parking spaces which are required for conformance with this ordinance. Staff Comment: The applicants are proposing 93 parking spaces. This is well above the required 57 parking spaces required by code. It should be noted that the new site plan shows a different layout for customer parking and traffic flow. The site plan shows a distinct parking lot that is separate from the RV L, City Council Agenda — 11/14/16 sales and display lot. The two areas are separated by a security fence. The sales and display area is not expected to utilize the customer parking area. (f) Vehicular access points shall create a minimum of conflict with through traffic movement and shall be subject to the approval of the Community Development Department. Staff Comment: The applicants are proposing to keep the vehicular access points the same. No new access points are proposed. (g) There is a minimum lot area of twenty -two thousand five hundred (22,500) square feet and minimum lot dimensions of one hundred fifty (15 0) feet by one hundred thirty (130) feet. Staff Comment: The large lot size (a total of 8.58 acres) exceeds the minimum. (h) A drainage system subject to the approval of the Community Development Department shall be installed. Staff Comment: The applicants have submitted a grading and drainage plan for the site. This is subject to further review and comment by the City Engineer. In this regard, the City expects to convey a small portion of City property in the far southwest corner of the site to the applicant for use as an infiltration ponding area. As a part of this review, a finding is included in the Planning Commission's resolution stating that the proposed use is consistent with the city's land use plan, as required by statute for such conveyances, should the City proceed with the conveyance. These standards are all met in place with the current improvements. In addition, the proposed landscaping, fencing and existing building materials are in conformance to code requirements. It should be noted that the applicant intends to include changes to the wall signs and monument. All such changes are required to be consistent with code requirements. The Commission will also note that the current monument sign is not compliant with code for setback and was placed without inspection. As such, it will be required to be moved in conformance with setback requirements as a condition of approval. The applicant maintains the option to apply for variance for this non - conforming sign. As a part of the use, the applicant has also indicated that they will be doing some service and maintenance of recreational vehicles that are for sale, or are being prepped for new buyers; by definition, this is allowed under the vehicle sales and rentals definition. 5 City Council Agenda — 11/14/16 Conditional Use Permit — Accessory Minor Vehicle (Automotive) Repair As noted, the applicant proposes to provide accessory vehicle repair as a part of the vehicle sales and rental operation. This use is allowed by Conditional Use Permit with the following specific standards identified in the zoning ordinance: (a) The use shall be designed to ensure proper functioning of the site as related to vehicle stacking, circulation, and turning movements. Staff Comment: No external stacking or circulation issues are anticipated on the property. (b) Repair of all vehicles shall occur within an enclosed building. Temporary outdoor vehicle storage may be allowed in an outdoor storage area that is no larger than 25 percent of the buildable area of the lot, is located behind the front building line of the principal structure, and is screened with a wooden fence or masonry wall in accordance with Section 4.3, Fences & Walls. Staff Comment: The applicant is not proposing exterior storage, apart from the display of vehicles for sale or rental. Maintenance to this standard will be a condition of approval. (c) Vehicles not being repaired but used as a source of parts shall be prohibited unless fully enclosed within a building or fully screened in accordance with (b) above. Staff Comment: Parts storage is to be contained within the principal building. Maintenance to this standard will be a condition of approval. (d) Vehicles that are repaired and are awaiting removal shall not be stored or parked for more than 30 consecutive days. In cases where a vehicle is abandoned by its lawful owner before or during the repair process, the vehicle may remain on site as long as is necessary after the 30 day period, provided the owner or operator of the establishment demonstrates steps have been taken to remove the vehicle from the premises using the appropriate legal means. Staff Comment: The repaired vehicles would be consistent with the storage and display area. Maintenance to this standard will be a condition of approval. Preliminary and Final Plat, and Vacation of Easements The proposed preliminary plat combines the existing RV parcel with a new parcel of land to the southwest of the existing site, creating a single lot. The applicants are proposing to extend the recreational vehicle display area onto this parcel. The existing property line contains a drainage and utility easement. The applicants will be G City Council Agenda — 11/14/16 required to execute an encroachment agreement related to the improvements over this easement. The applicant has also indicated that it is their intent to request vacation of the easements at a later date. The City Engineer has verified that there are no public improvements in the easements requiring the maintenance of the public drainage and utility easement. As a part of the vacation request, the applicants should note that the perimeter easements along common property lines may be designed to be 6 feet in width, rather than the 12 feet adjacent to rights of way. Because the vacations are occurring separately, the plat should reflect both the existing and proposed easements, with the later vacation to occur only on the excess easement areas. If the City proceeds with conveyance of the additional .27 acre parcel (vacated right of way area), the applicant is required to revise the final plat to include the piece into the single lot. A revised final plat with this parcel incorporated is included with the application package, and will be subject to the review and approval of the City Council. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat with the Exhibit Z conditions. Development Agreement The development agreement included for Council review is in draft form, outlining the terms and conditions associated with the proposed project. It should be noted that the project does not include any public improvements, and therefore no securities for public improvements are included within the agreement. The agreement specifies that trunk charges apply on the undeveloped land area incorporated into the plat, and a landscaping security for the site improvements is required. Other standard provisions relating to site management for grading and erosion control, as well as an outline of the City approvals, are included. The developer is still reviewing the document with their legal counsel, but given the development timeline, the agreement is included for Council approval, subject to final review and satisfaction of the City Attorney as related to the developer's comments. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision 1. Ordinance No.655 Rezoning that part of Lot 1, Block 1 which lies Northeasterly of Vacated Chelsea Court as dedicated in the 90th Street 3rd Addition from B -4, Regional Business to B -3, Highway Business. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 655, rezoning that part of Lot 1, Block 1 which lies Northeasterly of Vacated Chelsea Court as dedicated in the 90th Street 3rd Addition to B -3, Highway Business District, based on findings as stated in Planning Commission Resolution No. PC- 2016 -036. 7 City Council Agenda — 11/14/16 2. Motion to deny adoption of Ordinance No. 655, based on findings to be determined at the meeting. 3. Motion to table action on the Ordinance, subject to additional information. Decision 2. Resolution 2016 -073, Conditional Use Permits for Vehicle Sales and Rental and Accessory Vehicle (Automotive) Service 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2016 -073 approving the Conditional Use Permits for Vehicle Sales and Rental and Accessory Vehicle (Automotive) Service for Camping World RV, based on the findings in said resolution, and subject to requirements of Exhibit Z. 2. Motion to deny adoption of the Resolution 2016 -073, based on findings to be determined at the public hearing. 3. Motion to table action on the Resolution 2016 -073, subject to consideration of a variance related to building size and other information. Decision 3. Resolution 2016 -074, Preliminary and Final Plat and Development Agreement for Camping World First Addition. Motion to adopt Resolution 2016 -074, approving the Preliminary and Final Plat and Development Agreement for Camping World First Addition, based on the findings in said resolution, and subject to the requirements of Exhibit Z, and subject to final comments and satisfaction of the City as to the development agreement. 2. Motion to deny adoption of the Resolution 2016 -074, based on findings to be determined at the public hearing. 3. Motion to table action on the Resolution 2016 -074, subject to additional information. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Rezoning, Conditional Use Permits, and Preliminary and Final Plat applications, based on the applicant's representations that the site will be updated but used essentially in its current configuration, and subject to the requirements of Exhibit Z. The improvements were made originally in compliance with the requirements for the current CUP language, and the site should facilitate the use in general conformance with ordinance intent and standards. As noted, the addition of the adjoining parcel to the main RV sales lot property results in a conflict with one portion of the table regulating the ratio of building size to lot area for vehicle sales facilities. Because the table was adopted in a way that leaves La City Council Agenda — 11/14/16 some ambiguity as to the actual regulations applying to the proposed use, the Planning Commission found that the proposal is consistent with the letter of the ordinance. To ensure that the application is consistent with both the intent and the letter of the ordinance, the Commission is meeting separately prior to the Council meeting to consider the need for a variance. SUPPORTING DATA A. Ordinance No. 655 B. Resolution No. 2016 -73, CUP C. Resolution No. 2016 -074 Preliminary and Final Plat and Development Agreement D. Planning Commission Rezoning Resolution No. PC- 2016 -036 E. Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. PC- 2016 -037 F. Planning Commission Preliminary Plat Resolution No. PC- 2016 -038 G. Aerial Image, Subject Parcel H. Applicant Narrative I. Site Plan J. Preliminary Plat K. Site Location Exhibit L. Final Plat — Revised, dated 11/2/16 M. Civil Plans, including: a. Existing Topography b. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control c. Details d. SWPPP and Storm Water Management Plan (digital only) N. Exterior Building Elevations O. Proposed Photometric P. Existing Photometric Q. Certificate of Survey R. Tree Survey S. City Engineer's Letter, dated 10/25/16 T. MnDOT Comment Letter, dated 11/8/16 U. Development Agreement, draft V. Encroachment Agreement, draft Z. Conditions of Approval Z City Council Agenda — 11/14/16 EXHIBIT Z Rezoning from B -4, General Business to B -3, Highway Business Conditional Use Permit for Vehicle Sales and Rental Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Minor Vehicle Repair Preliminary and Final Plat for Camping World First Addition 3801 Chelsea Road Lot 1, Block 1, 901 Street Addition 1. The applicant will prepare an amended final plat incorporating all acquired property into the same development parcel. (Complete) 2. The applicant meets all performance standards as identified in the staff report and zoning ordinance. 3. The applicant will submit the necessary paperwork to vacate the drainage and utility easements related to the lot combination, subject to encroachment agreements governing improvements prior to vacation of the easements, such vacations only to the extent that the required easement widths will remain in force. 4. The applicant is found to meet all applicable zoning regulations governing building size ratios, or the applicant receives approval of a variance based on the existing lot and building sizes. 5. Signage plans will be submitted for permits in accordance with sign ordinance allowances and processing. 6. The applicant comply with the City Engineer's report dated October 25, 2016. 7. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement which is subject to final review and satisfaction of the City Attorney. 8. Requirements and comments of other city staff are incorporated into the final approval. 10 ORDINANCE NO. 655 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY FROM B -4, REGIONAL BUSINESS DISTRICT TO B -3, HIGHWAY BUSINESS DISTRICT: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CAMPING WORLD FIRST ADDITION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS: Section� The zoning map of the City of Monticello is hereby amended to rezone the following described parcels from egional Business to B -3, Highway Business: Im PID NUMBERS: 15_5185001011, 155185001010, 155128001010 (See attached Legal Description) a Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this day of , 2016. Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, Administrator AYES: NAYS: ORDINANCE NO. 655 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-073 A RESOLUTION OF THE MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR VEHICLE SALES AND RENTAL AND ACCESSORY MINOR AUTO RPAIR SERVICE LOT 1, BLOCK 1 CAMPING WORLD ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to improve property for a vehicle sales and rental facility, as well as accessory minor vehicle service in the B -3 District, Highway Business District; and WHEREAS, the proposed use will require the approval of conditional use permits for the both the vehicle sales and rental in the B -3 District, as well as the accessory minor vehicle service, as proposed; and WHEREAS, the proposed use and development are consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of "Places to Shop" for the area; and WHEREAS, the uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the B -3. Highway Business zoning district; and WHEREAS, the uses will not create any unanticipated changes to the demand for public services on or around the site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 1St, 2016 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 8th, 2016 to consider the application for a variance from the building -lot area ratio requirements for the proposed use; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello made the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the B -3, Highway Business District. 2. The proposed uses are consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by commercial land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The vehicle sales and rental, along with the accessory minor vehicle service use meets the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations, pursuant to the conditions attached to the Conditional Use Permit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: The Monticello City Council hereby approves the Conditional Use Permits as recommended by the Planning Commission, adopting its findings of fact, subject to compliance with related codes and regulations for such use, and the following conditions: 1. The applicant will prepare an amended final plat incorporating all acquired property into the same development parcel. 2. The applicant meets all performance standards as identified in the staff report and zoning ordinance. 3. The applicant will submit the necessary paperwork to vacate the drainage and utility easements related to the lot combination, subject to encroachment agreements governing improvements prior to vacation of the easements, such vacations only to the extent that the required easement widths will remain in force. 4. The applicant is found to meet all applicable zoning regulations governing building size ratios, or the applicant receives approval of a variance based on the existing lot and building sizes. 5. Signage plans will be submitted for permits in accordance with sign ordinance allowances and processing. 6. The applicant comply with the City Engineer's report dated October 25, 2016. 7. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement which is subject to final review and satisfaction of the City Attorney. 8. Requirements and comments of other city staff are incorporated into the final approval. ADOPTED this 14t' day of November, 2016, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL C ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator Brian Stumpf, Mayor CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-074 A RESOLUTION OF THE MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT AND DEVLEOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR CAMPING WORLD FIRST ADDITION TO MONTICELLO WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted an application for approval of a Preliminary and Final Plat to accommodate the development of retail uses; and WHEREAS, the property in question is guided for commercial uses under the "Places to Shop" category in the Monticello Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the property in question is proposed to be zoned B -3, Highway Business District to accommodate the proposed uses on the combined parcel in the proposed plat; and WHEREAS, the proposed plat will accommodate a development project consistent with the requirements of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed project will meet the goals and policies of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan, as well as the Zoning Ordinance encouraging commercial uses on the subject property; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 1, 2016 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello hereby makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed project complies with the intent of the use of the property within the City Comprehensive Plan. 2. With conditions, the proposed plat meets all applicable requirements of the City's Zoning Ordinance. 3. All applicable requirements and performance standards of the City's Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances will be satisfied. 4. The addition of commercial retail uses on the subject site is consistent with the City's development objectives. 5. The retail project contributes to a reasonable expectation and density of land use on the property. 6. The project can be accommodated with existing and planned public infrastructure. 7. The project will not negatively impact conditions or property values for other properties in the area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: The Monticello City Council hereby approves the Camping World First Addition Preliminary and Final Plat applications as recommended by the Planning Commission, and the Development Agreement regulating the development and completion of required plat improvements, subject to compliance with related codes and regulations for such use, and the following conditions: 1. The applicant will prepare an amended final plat incorporating all acquired property into the same development parcel. 2. The applicant meets all performance standards as identified in the staff report and zoning ordinance. 3. The applicant will submit the necessary paperwork to vacate the drainage and utility easements related to the lot combination, subject to encroachment agreements governing improvements prior to vacation of the easements, such vacations only to the extent that the required easement widths will remain in force. 4. The applicant is found to meet all applicable zoning regulations governing building size ratios, or the applicant receives approval of a variance based on the existing lot and building sizes. 5. Signage plans will be submitted for permits in accordance with sign ordinance allowances and processing. 6. The applicant comply with the City Engineer's report dated October 25, 2016. 7. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement which is subject to final review and satisfaction of the City Attorney. 8. Requirements and comments of other city staff are incorporated into the final approval. ADOPTED this 14th day of November, 2016, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL ATTEST: Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2016 -036 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A REZONING FROM B -4, GENERAL BUSINESS TO B -3, HIGHWAY BUSINESS TO ACCOMMODATE THE DEVELOPMENT AND EXPANSION OF A VEHICLE SALES AND RENTAL FACILITY WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to operate and expand a vehicle sales and rental facility with accessory minor vehicle service; and WHEREAS, a portion of the subject property is currently zoned B -3, Highway Business, and a separate portion is zoned B -4, General Business, the latter of which does not allow vehicle service uses; and WHEREAS, the subject property is proposed to be zoned entirely B -3, Highway Business, in which vehicle sales and rental, as well as accessory minor vehicle service uses are allowed as by conditional use permit; and WHEREAS, the proposed construction is consistent with the relevant general and conditional zoning requirements of the B -3 District; and WHEREAS, the remaining site and building improvements on the subject property consistent with the B -3 District requirements; and WHEREAS, the subject property is guided for "Places to Shop" in the official Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the matter at its regular meeting on November 1 St, 2016 and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the intent of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed rezoning will meet the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 3. The proposed rezoning will not create undue burdens on public systems, including streets and utilities. 4. The proposed rezoning will not create substantial impacts, visual or otherwise, on neighboring land uses. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota that the proposed rezoning is hereby recommended for approval. ADOPTED this 1st day of November, 2016, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTECIE>LLO PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: Angela Schur da #, C% munity Development Director 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2016 -037 RECOMENDING APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR VEHICLE SALES AND RENTAL AND ACCESSORY MINOR VEHICLE SERVICE LOT 1, BLOCK 1 CAMPING WORLD ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to improve property for a vehicle sales and rental facility, as well as accessory minor vehicle service in the B -3 District, Highway Business District; and WHEREAS, the proposed use will require the approval of conditional use permits for the both the vehicle sales and rental in the B -3 District, as well as the accessory minor vehicle service, as proposed; and WHEREAS, the proposed use and development are consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of "Places to Shop" for the area; and WHEREAS, the uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the B -3. Highway Business zoning district; and WHEREAS, the uses will not create any unanticipated changes to the demand for public services on or around the site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 1St, 2016 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the B -3, Highway Business District. 2. The proposed uses are consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by commercial land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The vehicle sales and rental, along with the accessory minor vehicle service use meets the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations, pursuant to the conditions attached to the Conditional Use Permit. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2016 -037 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Conditional Use Permits for Vehicle Sales and Rental, as well as for Accessory Use Auto Repair - Minor, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z as follows: 1. The applicant will prepare an amended final plat incorporating all acquired property into the same development parcel. 2. The applicant meets all performance standards as identified in the staff report and zoning ordinance, including verification of lighting compliance. 3. The applicant will submit the necessary paperwork to vacate the drainage and utility easements related to the plat, and the plat is subject to encroachment agreements governing improvements prior to vacation of the easements. 4. The applicant is found to meet all applicable zoning regulations governing building size ratios, or the applicant receives approval of a variance based on the existing lot and building sizes. 5. Signage plans will be submitted for permits in accordance with sign ordinance allowances and processing. The monument sign shall be relocated in conformance to setback requirements. 6. Requirements of the City Engineer's report dated October 25, 2016 are complied with. 7. Requirements of MnDOT as related to their review of the plat. 8. The applicant is required to continue to comply with the standards identified for the Accessory Use Autor Repair — Minor. 9. Requirements and comments of other city staff are incorporated into the final approval. 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2016 -037 ADOPTED this 1" day of November, 2016 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. G COMMIS Brad R ATTEST: CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2016 -038 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR A SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS CAMPING WORLD ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to improve property for a vehicle sales and rental facility in the B -3 District, Highway Business District; and WHEREAS, the proposed use will require the consolidation of existing parcels to accommodate the development; and WHEREAS, the proposed use and development are consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of "Places to Shop" for the area; and WHEREAS, the proposed uses are consistent with the intent and purpose of the B -3. Highway Business zoning district; and WHEREAS, the proposed plat is consistent with the standards and requirements of the Monticello Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the plat will not create any unanticipated changes to the demand for public services on or around the site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 1St, 2016 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed uses and subdivision are consistent with the intent and purpose of the B -3, Highway Business District, and the applicable Subdivision Ordinance regulations. 2. The proposed uses are consistent with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located. 3. The impacts of the improvements are those anticipated by commercial land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The vehicle sales and rental use meets the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations, pursuant to the conditions attached to the Conditional Use Permit. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2016 -038 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council Preliminary Plat for the Camping World Addition, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z as follows: 1. The applicant will prepare an amended final plat incorporating all acquired property into the same development parcel. 2. The applicant meets all performance standards as identified in the staff report and zoning ordinance, including verification of lighting compliance. 3. The applicant will submit the necessary paperwork to vacate the drainage and utility easements related to the plat, and the plat is subject to encroachment agreements governing improvements prior to vacation of the easements. 4. The applicant is found to meet all applicable zoning regulations governing building size ratios, or the applicant receives approval of a variance based on the existing lot and building sizes. 5. Signage plans will be submitted for permits in accordance with sign ordinance allowances and processing. The monument sign shall be relocated in conformance to setback requirements. 6. Requirements of the City Engineer's report dated October 25, 2016 are complied with. 7. Requirements of MnDOT as related to their review of the plat. 8. The applicant is required to continue to comply with the standards identified for the Accessory Use Autor Repair — Minor. 9. Requirements and comments of other city staff are incorporated into the final approval. 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC- 2016 -038 ADOPTED this 1St day of November, 2016 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION By: /V J i Brad . ATTEST: Angela SchumqhnVCon}Liz nity Development Director 3 FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC - Request for Conditional Use Permit, Preliminary & Final Plat, Rezoning 3801 Chelsea Road West, 155-128-001010,155-185-001010 Created by: City of Monticello S� 9 15517100004 7 %i. 155500104200 155 _A .a A '-Z 011 r Z l 155500 fl. 32 13 U) _ D .°3100104201 .r 26D X70 1552 �'i�4 �; .. � - i :mart �'�` -.�! �i r .�F �^ ,� .j•, S . 1115517 1 0s '' 1 Z 1.5512800:10`1.0 `-- m , .1.555001. 13208 � 14, ~ • � ,.! ., 1551850'444�10 � "� :\. �.;r�r `� w 155185 _ f # Fee r` a* _ �—'� 1 55225441 01 0 104301 ` - r' 1 55,18 0 01 0 .� � � 15550011 =3303 F �, ; � s.: 155125000440 - 155171000064: '115125 V411'4 � . w I 364 ft IN +. K inghorn September 23, 2016 Ms. Angela Schumann Community Development Director 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Camping World Narrative OCT 1 7 2016 Camping World has purchased the current Quality RV (old Dodge Dealership) site on the south side of the freeway at 3810 Chelsea Road West in Monticello, MN. They have also purchased the triangular piece adjacent to the dealership to the west of the property for additional RV sales parking. They desire to combine the two parcels and have submitted applications for the rezoning to B3 so both parcels match as well as submitting applications for the preliminary and final platting of the two parcels into one. They have also submitted the land use applications with all the required signatures and required fees plus the application for a conditional use permit. That application is also meant to include an amendment to the CUP. They will comply with all requirements in the zoning ordinance regarding the CUP. They have also applied for a sign permit that shows all the locations for the signage on the property and building and it is complete. It is also Camping World's plan to execute an encroachment agreement to facilitate the construction timeline for this late Fall construction and then they plan to vacate the drainage and utility easements between the two parcels. The grading plan for the site illustrates storm water infrastructure for the development on the small parcel to the west of the proposed new parking area which is owned by the City. Camping World would like to purchase this small piece for infiltration requirement. Title work has been ordered on behalf of the city to verify current and correct ownership. Separate letter to Ms. Schumann from Camping World has been sent. If title and price is agreeable, Camping World is content with a quick claim deed for a closing document. Several items that are within the Project Narrative that do not apply to this project because this is not a project for development include: 1. Whether the applicant will be the builder or if the land will be sold to other developers /builders 2. Phasing 3. Plans or documents for Homeowner's Association 4. Possible negative impacts to surrounding property and mitigation measures and 5. A statement of the proposed use of the lots, stating type of residential buildings with number of proposed dwelling units and type of business or industry so as to reveal the effect of development on traffic, fire hazards etc.. General Contractors 21830 Industrial Court Rogers, MN 55374 Tel: 763 - 428 -8088 Fax: 763 - 428 -8090 Z: AProjects \DatoCAD \Quality PV \Site Plan.aec r N Z^ m g UJ o m � m � m D r � Cn z c r � m � m 2 vy � ^ rn ao c/) O rn � � °o xo xo � � m � c�� cam �.� rn � p O rnrn � o� O Z (c D D � � m D C � rnD rn O D D G7 � O Z7 ZJ � N � U� CO � � � N � N O Z Z � G7 � � Ul O � — \O TI rn o � cn ° � o r � �1 O C/) C (j-I 0o f�Tl W W —' 07 �! � � � CD rn o � rn � U, rn D � D O D D IOTI IOTl ITOI � I� � � O rn D rr �p�zm °a�N --�� >.'c' rn Z cn -� r x = m' z o o'm�to � C � � o O �� n Q /� zoom m � rn I� N I� m o O D �� m ` n � ° _ � Ll � � R'I I b �`�w� � y � Tt ° rn D cn ao c rAi z � m m I m m f� r, � un � I rn y � r*, o � rm 1] � �•Q Z �� o V♦ t7 O o �'-' 'T'� ri �" cn � m � r- -T, '� n z r+i z o T ri p Z von � � N� � � rn �� ° o �m a Un cmifb� ryO � I m� m a �c N � r' .� z � o� lT, ➢m b � c ° Vl' O a n c � m ° n � yo�m � rn � � z � � � >>< � � � � rn F�•1 � O � C C C � � C � � A rn � c' rmi c' A � m � � � ' ' � Do lcrn � � ,4�i7 m� r� � '"� r r v� Z d '>' f*7 Q O � W � m O Q ➢ ��or � FJ ° [Ctl � � m m I m � � o D " p o z r (7n, � I No m w � m s © z � � ~b r m rn --I °°- z v ©o pp � Z � i!I ➢ � o � � a fit mm b b !f1 � r C N m mw y�na n D rn N lJ J a 5 g OD ^ tv cf) —I o v o' D Fl -0 c r'cyi m� > m 22 O O m m mg� °gig �`"o c� 6 m i m S. S. `" O O 11 r = Zm = z —I m m v' N D ^z Z o r�'i mg ' y x U J W � �� s� � O `t' _ ■o Z n = x 70 m O rn U) y z z �--� C SO 8 = v v fll o�DO M� m z In I mm t/1 p c �f L N p z g vi O N z tn ED j co N 0 Z_ ° Z a Z O G) m -n n N I _ N ��� Z � "� O m �ld��� z n n - % ca K z / t i/ -� '� 0 D OAS 1��� 0 c :Z R \ O_ I II � X010 by >! -- i F n z \ ,� J - -L— Q —�J I m c� v / m \� `° RL 05 " ;� -� i -u m i� �! ! �v (° qD ! Zvv.� :.. 1A� �! c. ' '� ' to p m m Z z \ -- yy•�� v� mist / o� m z - _,� -- z \- - -- -- o - -_- - -- m CD 0 y o z� '30 OZ �T o a ° 1G9 � / / \ �� m pm � o �^ o� / v vm / m ; p \ I Q1 -X 4 ca �_ i O o co PICKET FENCE CD cc ch - ��� X / m r m�C �� o m�� �. o H - �m o / 5 m —� O / / x �- I �� d m / FO v a m / aoZVa� zO\ i c� -a - bl m 8'ALUMPI �zg�� v cnij _ my o m � v I = X _ V ALUM PICKET FENCE 11 — — — — — -- - -- -- -- -- - — - -- x - — -- -- -- -- -- N FEN -- c 8'8 - -- -- - -- - - -- -- m z 600.74' P.L. m � z / CIO /� ? O VJ C m D O � m � � I 1 Z Zoo �m .. �°�0 C) W � �Z o co Q) - D CORNER PC'7 IENCRI ' m D 0 ' N O Z m 0 � m ■ y LINE POSE IAIGTH c � ^ rn ao c/) O rn � � °o xo xo � � m � c�� cam �.� rn � p O rnrn � o� O Z (c D D � � m D C � rnD rn O D D G7 � O Z7 ZJ � N � U� CO � � � N � N O Z Z � G7 � � Ul O � — \O TI rn o � cn ° � o r � �1 O C/) C (j-I 0o f�Tl W W —' 07 �! � � � CD rn o � rn � U, rn D � D O D D IOTI IOTl ITOI � I� � � O rn D rr �p�zm °a�N --�� >.'c' rn Z cn -� r x = m' z o o'm�to � C � � o O �� n Q /� zoom m � rn I� N I� m o O D �� m ` n � ° _ � Ll � � R'I I b �`�w� � y � Tt ° rn D cn ao c rAi z � m m I m m f� r, � un � I rn y � r*, o � rm 1] � �•Q Z �� o V♦ t7 O o �'-' 'T'� ri �" cn � m � r- -T, '� n z r+i z o T ri p Z von � � N� � � rn �� ° o �m a Un cmifb� ryO � I m� m a �c N � r' .� z � o� lT, ➢m b � c ° Vl' O a n c � m ° n � yo�m � rn � � z � � � >>< � � � � rn F�•1 � O � C C C � � C � � A rn � c' rmi c' A � m � � � ' ' � Do lcrn � � ,4�i7 m� r� � '"� r r v� Z d '>' f*7 Q O � W � m O Q ➢ ��or � FJ ° [Ctl � � m m I m � � o D " p o z r (7n, � I No m w � m s © z � � ~b r m rn --I °°- z v ©o pp � Z � i!I ➢ � o � � a fit mm b b !f1 � r C N m mw y�na n D rn N lJ J a 5 g OD ^ tv cf) —I o v o' D Fl -0 c r'cyi m� > m 22 O O m m mg� °gig �`"o c� 6 m i m S. S. `" O O 11 r = Zm = z —I m m v' N D ^z Z o r�'i mg ' y x U J W � �� s� � O `t' _ ■o Z n = x 70 m O rn U) y z z �--� C SO 8 = v v fll o�DO M� m z In I mm t/1 p c �f L N p z g vi O N z tn ED j co N 0 Z_ ° Z a Z O G) m -n n N I _ N ��� Z � "� O m �ld��� z n n - % ca K z / t i/ -� '� 0 D OAS 1��� 0 c :Z R \ O_ I II � X010 by >! -- i F n z \ ,� J - -L— Q —�J I m c� v / m \� `° RL 05 " ;� -� i -u m i� �! ! �v (° qD ! Zvv.� :.. 1A� �! c. ' '� ' to p m m Z z \ -- yy•�� v� mist / o� m z - _,� -- z \- - -- -- o - -_- - -- m CD 0 y o z� '30 OZ �T o a ° 1G9 � / / \ �� m pm � o �^ o� / v vm / m ; p \ I Q1 -X 4 ca �_ i O o co PICKET FENCE CD cc ch - ��� X / m r m�C �� o m�� �. o H - �m o / 5 m —� O / / x �- I �� d m / FO v a m / aoZVa� zO\ i c� -a - bl m 8'ALUMPI �zg�� v cnij _ my o m � v I = X _ V ALUM PICKET FENCE 11 — — — — — -- - -- -- -- -- - — - -- x - — -- -- -- -- -- N FEN -- c 8'8 - -- -- - -- - - -- -- m z 600.74' P.L. m � z / CIO /� ? O VJ C m D O � m � � I 1 Z Zoo �m .. �°�0 C) W � �Z o co Q) - D CORNER PC'7 IENCRI ' m D 0 ' N O Z m 0 � m ■ y LINE POSE IAIGTH c rr �p�zm °a�N --�� >.'c' rn Z cn -� r x = m' z o o'm�to � C � � o O �� n Q /� zoom m � rn I� N I� m o O D �� m ` n � ° _ � Ll � � R'I I b �`�w� � y � Tt ° rn D cn ao c rAi z � m m I m m f� r, � un � I rn y � r*, o � rm 1] � �•Q Z �� o V♦ t7 O o �'-' 'T'� ri �" cn � m � r- -T, '� n z r+i z o T ri p Z von � � N� � � rn �� ° o �m a Un cmifb� ryO � I m� m a �c N � r' .� z � o� lT, ➢m b � c ° Vl' O a n c � m ° n � yo�m � rn � � z � � � >>< � � � � rn F�•1 � O � C C C � � C � � A rn � c' rmi c' A � m � � � ' ' � Do lcrn � � ,4�i7 m� r� � '"� r r v� Z d '>' f*7 Q O � W � m O Q ➢ ��or � FJ ° [Ctl � � m m I m � � o D " p o z r (7n, � I No m w � m s © z � � ~b r m rn --I °°- z v ©o pp � Z � i!I ➢ � o � � a fit mm b b !f1 � r C N m mw y�na n D rn N lJ J a 5 g OD ^ tv cf) —I o v o' D Fl -0 c r'cyi m� > m 22 O O m m mg� °gig �`"o c� 6 m i m S. S. `" O O 11 r = Zm = z —I m m v' N D ^z Z o r�'i mg ' y x U J W � �� s� � O `t' _ ■o Z n = x 70 m O rn U) y z z �--� C SO 8 = v v fll o�DO M� m z In I mm t/1 p c �f L N p z g vi O N z tn ED j co N 0 Z_ ° Z a Z O G) m -n n N I _ N ��� Z � "� O m �ld��� z n n - % ca K z / t i/ -� '� 0 D OAS 1��� 0 c :Z R \ O_ I II � X010 by >! -- i F n z \ ,� J - -L— Q —�J I m c� v / m \� `° RL 05 " ;� -� i -u m i� �! ! �v (° qD ! Zvv.� :.. 1A� �! c. ' '� ' to p m m Z z \ -- yy•�� v� mist / o� m z - _,� -- z \- - -- -- o - -_- - -- m CD 0 y o z� '30 OZ �T o a ° 1G9 � / / \ �� m pm � o �^ o� / v vm / m ; p \ I Q1 -X 4 ca �_ i O o co PICKET FENCE CD cc ch - ��� X / m r m�C �� o m�� �. o H - �m o / 5 m —� O / / x �- I �� d m / FO v a m / aoZVa� zO\ i c� -a - bl m 8'ALUMPI �zg�� v cnij _ my o m � v I = X _ V ALUM PICKET FENCE 11 — — — — — -- - -- -- -- -- - — - -- x - — -- -- -- -- -- N FEN -- c 8'8 - -- -- - -- - - -- -- m z 600.74' P.L. m � z / CIO /� ? O VJ C m D O � m � � I 1 Z Zoo �m .. �°�0 C) W � �Z o co Q) - D CORNER PC'7 IENCRI ' m D 0 ' N O Z m 0 � m ■ y LINE POSE IAIGTH c mw y�na n D rn N lJ J a 5 g OD ^ tv cf) —I o v o' D Fl -0 c r'cyi m� > m 22 O O m m mg� °gig �`"o c� 6 m i m S. S. `" O O 11 r = Zm = z —I m m v' N D ^z Z o r�'i mg ' y x U J W � �� s� � O `t' _ ■o Z n = x 70 m O rn U) y z z �--� C SO 8 = v v fll o�DO M� m z In I mm t/1 p c �f L N p z g vi O N z tn ED j co N 0 Z_ ° Z a Z O G) m -n n N I _ N ��� Z � "� O m �ld��� z n n - % ca K z / t i/ -� '� 0 D OAS 1��� 0 c :Z R \ O_ I II � X010 by >! -- i F n z \ ,� J - -L— Q —�J I m c� v / m \� `° RL 05 " ;� -� i -u m i� �! ! �v (° qD ! Zvv.� :.. 1A� �! c. ' '� ' to p m m Z z \ -- yy•�� v� mist / o� m z - _,� -- z \- - -- -- o - -_- - -- m CD 0 y o z� '30 OZ �T o a ° 1G9 � / / \ �� m pm � o �^ o� / v vm / m ; p \ I Q1 -X 4 ca �_ i O o co PICKET FENCE CD cc ch - ��� X / m r m�C �� o m�� �. o H - �m o / 5 m —� O / / x �- I �� d m / FO v a m / aoZVa� zO\ i c� -a - bl m 8'ALUMPI �zg�� v cnij _ my o m � v I = X _ V ALUM PICKET FENCE 11 — — — — — -- - -- -- -- -- - — - -- x - — -- -- -- -- -- N FEN -- c 8'8 - -- -- - -- - - -- -- m z 600.74' P.L. m � z / CIO /� ? O VJ C m D O � m � � I 1 Z Zoo �m .. �°�0 C) W � �Z o co Q) C7 - - D CORNER PC'7 IENCRI ' m D 0 ' N O Z m 0 � m ■ y LINE POSE IAIGTH c co 0 7- T V /'� T V , V � > m z Z m r 0 ■ 0 7- T V /'� T V , V � > m z Z m r 0 ■ o II D r 0 Q 0 Q m cQ CD Q 0 7 Z 0 N OD o�cu? � ONE n�' myQ�o� {�° o�QC�T 7N33�� z � 0 m �- o o� 0 z J O z W OO O r m 0 C7 C 7rl Z Trn C N rn zgf� N rn D r Cn TO N rn O- N U =1 =2 zevz S _ y co m o � � r � a D ID CD x (D � ` T n Z 07 0 o ,+ cn cn n o -N � u r 1 zgf� N rn D r Cn TO N rn O- N U =1 =2 zevz S _ y co m o � � r � a D ID CD x (D � ` T n Z 07 0 o ,+ cn cn n o -N � u r 1 3 0 0 c i� 0 U 0 L6 rn / 3 d- O Ln rn / 00 O 0 N E 02 M s O N N C� I C: 0 (.0 J / O � N � V) CD 6 +� U O / Y Preliminary Plat f r r 0 CAMPING WORLD FIRST ADDITION r r jolf 17"'RAIT-111-D LINCOLNSHIRE, LLC F10, Ll M-: 60 0 60 120 L_ i!%iiiiiiiiij SCALE IN FEET DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE PLATTED: (Per First American Title Insurance Company, Commitment No. NCS- 806919 -PHX1 dated August 12, 2016) (PID No. 155 - 185 - 001010) The part of Lot 1, Block 1, 90th Street 3rd Addition, which lies northeasterly of vacated Chelsea Court as dedicated in 90th Street Addition, Wright County, Minnesota. AND (Per First American Title Insurance Company, Commitment No. NCS- 806919A -PHX1 dated August 12, 2016) (PID No. 155 - 128 - 001010) Lot 1, Block 1, 90th Street 2nd Addition, except that part platted as 90th Street 3rd Addition, Wright County, Minnesota. NOTES: 1. The property contains no wetlands. 2. The underground utilities shown have been located from visible evidence, field markings per Gopher State One Call Ticket No. 162571745 and available mapping. The surveyor makes no guarantees that the underground utilities shown comprise all such utilities in the area, either in service or abandoned. The surveyor further does not warrant that the underground utilities shown are in the exact location indicated although he does certify that they are located as accurately as possible from information available. The surveyor has not physically located the underground utilities. Prior to any excavation, contact Gopher State One Coll for an on -site location (651- 454 - 0002). 3. Easements depicted per First American Title Commitment No. NCS- 806919A -PHX1 dated August 12, 2016. 4. Existing building is approximately 38,573 sq. feet in size. Municipality: City of Monticello Existing Zoning: B -3 Highway Business B -4 Regional Business Overlay Zoning: FBS- Freeway Bonus Sign District Proposed Use: Highway Retail Road Mileage: N/A Street Lighting N/A Proposed Utilities: N/A Plat Area: Total Area: 374,098 Sq.Ft. = 8.588 Acres Proposed ROW: 0 Sq.Ft. = 0.00 Acres Park Area: 0 Sq.Ft. = 0.00 Acres Lot Summary: Number of Lots: 1 Average Lot Area: 374,098 Sq.Ft. Density: 0.116 Lots per Acre Owner /Subdivider: FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC 250 Parkway Drive ss's Suite 270 Lincolnshire, IL 60069 Engineer /Surveyor: Hakanson Anderson Assoc. .O/ 3601 Thurston Avenue Anoka, MN 55303 I (763) 427 -5860 I I C0.1 RD. 39 NE \ Contact: Charles R. Christopherson P.L.S. B V L_I \ \ /\I ITI /1T PID NO. 155 - 226- 000020 \ Riverwood Bank \ Zoned B -3 \ A F-'\F-'\ITI/ -\I\ I G� / \ t�� 1141 \ - CB RE= 956.16 / #24 IE(NE)= 953.01 / �_ / IE(S)= 953.05 / I� l \ X#25 \ IE(SE)= 953.21 \/ #22 ldf _ r o#21 /�a&\G�\ \ #2 / 9S�\ - - - �� /// ` 0TyhSoSter 1 ��� / CB \ \ R�4 9 10 'y q of � o � 0 6 2� 00 � 7 RE= 956.09 8 0369 O /�ON %C #20 \ I �_ E(N)= 953.34 \� /F \ \ �, /� 7 / C / /� 957 IE E)- 953.34 \ /F\`9s \ \ #17 E(W) _ 39 \ 9S 678 \ RE- 956.11 n / 3) E(E�953.44 n / E(S) @53.39 \ ` \ •� � O.�O e'/ / � #16 1 IE(SW)�953.76 � \ \ I /O c' '\ y� H PES> \ propane -� \ OHO 15 #14 �/ tC` ix 0' � #,35` DcDc 12 \ 956 951 Z) � \ v ` h ^/ �1 \ \ �. ;... FE= 957.72 .. , /1 I � �/ \ 5� 6 E_957 70 PIV� �I / I \ O / RE= 956.03 / ° C/J RE = 956.08 G GFE= 957.70 / / / 16 I \ \ �J ��I / �O / E= 953.68/ IE= 953.93 \FFE -950 66 �, (\ GFE= 957.69 / 11 South line of Lot 1, -81ack 11 y� � /L. GFE = 957.67 !. 90TH STREET 2ND ADDITIONI �J ` 9; i�J L _ #26 / Gases F FF�gs GFE= 957.68 -- _ _ _ - G Meter o` FF 9S �s) Existing Building \ I / 1 mwO / _ ' 3801 Chelsea Rd. W 0,� �\ I / Elec \\ Drainage & Utility oo / Cabinets co '/ I^ Easement per rec>1rd plat •� � r� �4i \ 2 of 90TH STREET 2ND \ ADDITION - North lime of Lot 1, Block 1, #4 � �^ I - 90TH STREET 3RD ADDITION Z 1 ` ! " S \ Q >; G u, #32 7idn5foi3rrer'• 'Q L i96 05 1, N ^ �1T1 I\ r1 �o /11 ITI /1T A \ \.-/vIL_\/I PID NO. 155-185-000010 City of Monticello Zoned 1 -1 T r- r- T / ' =336.00 / t o m �- o 0�e >' X33 °25'54" LOT z __,1--- "tt'Teas1erly line -0 ao I 1 h . i �� ::4:: - o G�' - - ' of vacated J a N #33 I '' ( ✓' ,'..''' 7 °� a L Chelsea Court, as `��� \J BLOCK �� " - `� \O dedicated in 90TH / W /�� RE =955.0 !`r.'.:` ^• h RE =954.96- v + N C STREET ADDITION I �� o a� 1 ( IE =950.9 h �o� /�' � :: 1` IE(S) =95 11 '_` "`, \ \ J _ (n 4� n'� , 1 IE(NE)= 950.16 � ... I LLI - \ „y� -7 I =) PID NO. 155-185-001010 �� r s� " ` _:�`.' o w - \9 \/ I \ LJo �� m \ am ".\ ' �� ?::; / Flag SC -- Pole ZA Storm MH > I \.� / S o9e r RE= 957.81 \I StO I \ l \ FFT 3 0 p Utigt I \ A I�/ II-\/ I T I \/ /\ N ` I #35 � 57 � - / - I \ W 0) - - 958 - -� F,g jti/h qp� °f �FOSe D 00 g °nth R \ 'noy���' "nt(s ss4MN / - 0 ` JI j �, _ 956 1 // F(NF -,946 3 / RF I �1 m �� ti -�� / - I W RE= 57.49 950 STRF r /Y�. - J\ \ \/F () 948 40 / / /F(S 9s3 �I m / O a 'I \ J / S D - � C FT @ of T \x),9494 .%o / F(NF�) 11956 r' / d \ \ 5g / w \ \ I ° g RF q4 \ �4 0 % 94"8,5' // #36 / \ \ �9 0 \ 1 N oI �j M /F,99S6�4 0�/ �0 7 \\ v i R tOr� �8/ / \ f\ I G1 - I r o N � m �, / �ry�° o ^^ / /- ,8 R'1' a'ock 7 �6 SS T I \ /F(N ��s9 l ° / __1 \ \ \� v 95° / ' \ �I - v 1 Z 1 7­0 I CB 948 \ / / #37 GP o RE= 953.Y0 / 1 I I o 0 � / C �`' 1 \ \ 7S m / 0 ��L� \ mmlE(SW) =94.41 \ I O N Say / \ \ I\ ,� q IE(NW)549�.45 1 r Z< (r s / ^r 9 D 2 }Ssr � \ CB X 72 S 4 .Q yyI �, RE =95 .37 _ _ _ _ I I M, CL 0 > Cp 1 \ D IE(N) =8.82 °5 \ orm D \: \ 38 IE(S)= 9}}8.77 (PLUGGB� Gg 1 I #4 San MH ­ IE SE N - - \ {J52.65 ' I/ RE= 956.13 1E(NW 948.80! -- RCP \ 1 IE(N)= 948.75 W) I )-948.80 1 D San MH D \ J \\ 1 IE(S)= 948.60 IE(S=48.80 Storm M , RE- 954.38 \ / / # A f�ITI -\I\ I v/ v II II //� FES \ C / / U �� #40\ \/ I / I E= 949.45 (a I G #41\ so m - -Storm MH _ Storm \ , \ \ \ RE= 956.68 L i RE1954 MH IE() 35 \ / �) ^30 R #42 I IE(S)= 947.50 4 \ IE (W) °947. Cp \ \ _ 8p /E( f) ,94g. 00 \ \ /� ,� \ \ I --CB 947.80 \ \ / \ - S -R€= 956 -13-- / v N on \ D IE= 952.50 = 6 S R,, \,9 1 , l8 s� w NQ S ess D S 1 0 07 �o /0 72S'10 q \ d nea B 4 c 000 ^I \ \ ry� 1 / 21 36 0) 3 10 \ cg 1 on�S P 9S ?S8 1 \ Rf__9S3 R fors MH D d 9S� f ( /w> 945 77 36 RCP CO \ /F 9S6 (N�,9 ¢3 Ff),94623 / ASS) 9S 46 / ' /8 \ \ /F(NW) 946 /,8 \ 916.1(9 ,8 \ DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: SHEET prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I CRC Hakanson A n d e rs o n am a duly Licensed Professional Land Surveyor under the g y � laws of th at of nes DRAWN BY: Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors PRELIMINARY PLAT SMM 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 CAMPING WORLD FIRST ADDITION OF _=75 R. CHRISTOPHERSON, LS - BY: CHECKED 763 - 427 -5860 FAX 763- 427 -0520 2 Date 09/30/16 Lic. No. 18420 CRC www.hoa- inc.com CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEETS 3395.04 VICINITY MAP N SEC.10, T.121, R.25 NO SCALE ss's Sim .O/ R/ DER I \ I I C0.1 RD. 39 NE \ I I =SITE I � N� I I II I 4* �\ I ter" B V L_I \ \ /\I ITI /1T PID NO. 155 - 226- 000020 \ Riverwood Bank \ Zoned B -3 \ A F-'\F-'\ITI/ -\I\ I G� / \ t�� 1141 \ - CB RE= 956.16 / #24 IE(NE)= 953.01 / �_ / IE(S)= 953.05 / I� l \ X#25 \ IE(SE)= 953.21 \/ #22 ldf _ r o#21 /�a&\G�\ \ #2 / 9S�\ - - - �� /// ` 0TyhSoSter 1 ��� / CB \ \ R�4 9 10 'y q of � o � 0 6 2� 00 � 7 RE= 956.09 8 0369 O /�ON %C #20 \ I �_ E(N)= 953.34 \� /F \ \ �, /� 7 / C / /� 957 IE E)- 953.34 \ /F\`9s \ \ #17 E(W) _ 39 \ 9S 678 \ RE- 956.11 n / 3) E(E�953.44 n / E(S) @53.39 \ ` \ •� � O.�O e'/ / � #16 1 IE(SW)�953.76 � \ \ I /O c' '\ y� H PES> \ propane -� \ OHO 15 #14 �/ tC` ix 0' � #,35` DcDc 12 \ 956 951 Z) � \ v ` h ^/ �1 \ \ �. ;... FE= 957.72 .. , /1 I � �/ \ 5� 6 E_957 70 PIV� �I / I \ O / RE= 956.03 / ° C/J RE = 956.08 G GFE= 957.70 / / / 16 I \ \ �J ��I / �O / E= 953.68/ IE= 953.93 \FFE -950 66 �, (\ GFE= 957.69 / 11 South line of Lot 1, -81ack 11 y� � /L. GFE = 957.67 !. 90TH STREET 2ND ADDITIONI �J ` 9; i�J L _ #26 / Gases F FF�gs GFE= 957.68 -- _ _ _ - G Meter o` FF 9S �s) Existing Building \ I / 1 mwO / _ ' 3801 Chelsea Rd. W 0,� �\ I / Elec \\ Drainage & Utility oo / Cabinets co '/ I^ Easement per rec>1rd plat •� � r� �4i \ 2 of 90TH STREET 2ND \ ADDITION - North lime of Lot 1, Block 1, #4 � �^ I - 90TH STREET 3RD ADDITION Z 1 ` ! " S \ Q >; G u, #32 7idn5foi3rrer'• 'Q L i96 05 1, N ^ �1T1 I\ r1 �o /11 ITI /1T A \ \.-/vIL_\/I PID NO. 155-185-000010 City of Monticello Zoned 1 -1 T r- r- T / ' =336.00 / t o m �- o 0�e >' X33 °25'54" LOT z __,1--- "tt'Teas1erly line -0 ao I 1 h . i �� ::4:: - o G�' - - ' of vacated J a N #33 I '' ( ✓' ,'..''' 7 °� a L Chelsea Court, as `��� \J BLOCK �� " - `� \O dedicated in 90TH / W /�� RE =955.0 !`r.'.:` ^• h RE =954.96- v + N C STREET ADDITION I �� o a� 1 ( IE =950.9 h �o� /�' � :: 1` IE(S) =95 11 '_` "`, \ \ J _ (n 4� n'� , 1 IE(NE)= 950.16 � ... I LLI - \ „y� -7 I =) PID NO. 155-185-001010 �� r s� " ` _:�`.' o w - \9 \/ I \ LJo �� m \ am ".\ ' �� ?::; / Flag SC -- Pole ZA Storm MH > I \.� / S o9e r RE= 957.81 \I StO I \ l \ FFT 3 0 p Utigt I \ A I�/ II-\/ I T I \/ /\ N ` I #35 � 57 � - / - I \ W 0) - - 958 - -� F,g jti/h qp� °f �FOSe D 00 g °nth R \ 'noy���' "nt(s ss4MN / - 0 ` JI j �, _ 956 1 // F(NF -,946 3 / RF I �1 m �� ti -�� / - I W RE= 57.49 950 STRF r /Y�. - J\ \ \/F () 948 40 / / /F(S 9s3 �I m / O a 'I \ J / S D - � C FT @ of T \x),9494 .%o / F(NF�) 11956 r' / d \ \ 5g / w \ \ I ° g RF q4 \ �4 0 % 94"8,5' // #36 / \ \ �9 0 \ 1 N oI �j M /F,99S6�4 0�/ �0 7 \\ v i R tOr� �8/ / \ f\ I G1 - I r o N � m �, / �ry�° o ^^ / /- ,8 R'1' a'ock 7 �6 SS T I \ /F(N ��s9 l ° / __1 \ \ \� v 95° / ' \ �I - v 1 Z 1 7­0 I CB 948 \ / / #37 GP o RE= 953.Y0 / 1 I I o 0 � / C �`' 1 \ \ 7S m / 0 ��L� \ mmlE(SW) =94.41 \ I O N Say / \ \ I\ ,� q IE(NW)549�.45 1 r Z< (r s / ^r 9 D 2 }Ssr � \ CB X 72 S 4 .Q yyI �, RE =95 .37 _ _ _ _ I I M, CL 0 > Cp 1 \ D IE(N) =8.82 °5 \ orm D \: \ 38 IE(S)= 9}}8.77 (PLUGGB� Gg 1 I #4 San MH ­ IE SE N - - \ {J52.65 ' I/ RE= 956.13 1E(NW 948.80! -- RCP \ 1 IE(N)= 948.75 W) I )-948.80 1 D San MH D \ J \\ 1 IE(S)= 948.60 IE(S=48.80 Storm M , RE- 954.38 \ / / # A f�ITI -\I\ I v/ v II II //� FES \ C / / U �� #40\ \/ I / I E= 949.45 (a I G #41\ so m - -Storm MH _ Storm \ , \ \ \ RE= 956.68 L i RE1954 MH IE() 35 \ / �) ^30 R #42 I IE(S)= 947.50 4 \ IE (W) °947. Cp \ \ _ 8p /E( f) ,94g. 00 \ \ /� ,� \ \ I --CB 947.80 \ \ / \ - S -R€= 956 -13-- / v N on \ D IE= 952.50 = 6 S R,, \,9 1 , l8 s� w NQ S ess D S 1 0 07 �o /0 72S'10 q \ d nea B 4 c 000 ^I \ \ ry� 1 / 21 36 0) 3 10 \ cg 1 on�S P 9S ?S8 1 \ Rf__9S3 R fors MH D d 9S� f ( /w> 945 77 36 RCP CO \ /F 9S6 (N�,9 ¢3 Ff),94623 / ASS) 9S 46 / ' /8 \ \ /F(NW) 946 /,8 \ 916.1(9 ,8 \ DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: SHEET prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I CRC Hakanson A n d e rs o n am a duly Licensed Professional Land Surveyor under the g y � laws of th at of nes DRAWN BY: Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors PRELIMINARY PLAT SMM 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 CAMPING WORLD FIRST ADDITION OF _=75 R. CHRISTOPHERSON, LS - BY: CHECKED 763 - 427 -5860 FAX 763- 427 -0520 2 Date 09/30/16 Lic. No. 18420 CRC www.hoa- inc.com CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEETS 3395.04 01 3 a 0 0 it 0 U 0 rn r7 / 3 O Ln M ro / 00 0 0 N E � O LO Y O N N � I C3 0 � J O � N D VI o � 6 +� U O/ Y Site Location f r r 0 Exhibit CAMPING WORLD FIRST ADDITION r jorf FRHP LINCOLNSHIRE, LLC !o 80 0 80 160 SCALE IN FEET DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE PLATTED: (Per First American Title Insurance Company, Commitment No. NCS- 806919 —PHX1 dated August 12, 2016) (PID No. 155 - 185 - 001010) The part of Lot 1, Block 1, 90th Street 3rd Addition, which lies northeasterly of vacated Chelsea Court as dedicated in 90th Street Addition, Wright County, Minnesota. AND (Per First American Title Insurance Company, Commitment No. NCS- 806919A —PHX1 dated August 12, 2016) (PID No. 155 - 128 - 001010) Lot 1, Block 1, 90th Street 2nd Addition, except that part platted as 90th Street 3rd Addition, Wright County, Minnesota. NOTES: 1. The property contains no wetlands. 2. The underground utilities shown have been located from visible evidence, field markings per Gopher State One Call Ticket No. 162571745 and available mapping. The surveyor makes no guarantees that the underground utilities shown comprise all such utilities in the area, either in service or abandoned. The surveyor further does not warrant that the underground utilities shown are in the exact location indicated although he does certify that they are located as accurately as possible from information available. The surveyor has not physically located the underground utilities. Prior to any excavation, contact Gopher State One Call for an on —site location (651- 454 - 0002). 3. Easements depicted per First American Title Commitment No. NCS- 806919A —PHX1 dated August 12, 2016. 4. Existing building is approximately 38,573 sq. feet in size. Municipality: Existing Zoning: Overlay Zoning: Proposed Use: Road Mileage: Street Lighting Proposed Utilities: City of Monticello B -3 Highway Business B -4 Regional Business FBS— Freeway Bonus Sign District Highway Retail N/A N/A N/A Plat Area: Total Area: 374,098 Sq.Ft. = 8.588 Acres Proposed ROW: 0 Sq.Ft. = 0.00 Acres Park Area: 0 Sq.Ft. = 0.00 Acres Lot Summary: Number of Lots: 1 Average Lot Area: 374,098 Sq.Ft. Density: 0.116 Lots per Acre Owner /Subdivider: FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC 250 Parkway Drive Suite 270 Lincolnshire, IL 60069 Engineer /Surveyor: Hakanson Anderson Assoc. 3601 Thurston Avenue Anoka, MN 55303 (763) 427 -5860 Contact: Charles R. Christopherson P.L.S. Zoned B -3 IN N. I \1 V L_1 \ — — -- - - - - -_ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \� A f1f11T1/1(\ I \JlJ I L_\J L� \ /— \L,/ LJI I I�/I N PID NO. 155 - 226- 000020 Riverwood Bank Zoned B -3 \(�1 /�tX rj` / `� �l% ��\ \\ \� ��\ /Vim• \ \� —� PID NO. 155 - 171 - 001010 / 11 / �� % 96 - / Jeff's Dream LLC / — \ /�/ tio�/ / r. �1 T I 140 70 - / Zoned B -4 O\ L.I / \ �. 3 \ \ On of /X �., • ,�'+`.°''` , � � / '' t , I � \ — \ — — Fj JI YI Drainage &Utility — — — — — — �6 Easement per record plat ADDITION STREET 2ND N o zl6 i ~ j .� I • I �� — z — \ — — o \ L L= 196.05 n wm° \ `' o ��,� ��_ R= 336.00 T o QI - / `' �', X33'25'54" I1[.L'0 I — '' /� .scJ --- �%� --`� BLOCK oa�l I � I T I /1 T A \\ \���� �i I \ U J PID NO. 155-185-001010 / V-1 U I L _ U I 0/) \V / pew o oe & — A �FYF1 I T I /1 N I Is I \ / I \ < \RO,o/ ttu16, l j\ LJ U I I I \J V I / — / I W I PID NO. 155 - 185 - 000010 _ / - City of Monticello f \q\t�ryo�' "''t I � \ Zoned 1 -1 ^ T �) F —� T / / \ \ // sl PID NO. 155 - 225 - 001010 Maas Automotive Group LLC i No Zoning I � i � / � \ �� \' I Zoned B -3 Oh A nnITlnl\ I I / — I \ \\ �� �I / 1, � > 0fr 190 11 4 0.00 \ \ \ o'ss, SS" S� - - - -' Zone /io '2S \ \ 524'49 i �\ aB 3 '-0 000190 \ jol \ \ , 10 \ >c IN \ Co \ \ \ i / DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: SHEET prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I CRC Hakanson A n d e rs o n am a duly Licensed Professional Land Surveyor under the g y SITE LOCATION EXHIBIT 2 MMMIN laws of the ate of ' es a DRA" BY: Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors �p SMM 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 CAMPING WORLD FIRST ADDITION of CHARLES R. CHRISTOPHERSON, CHECKED BY: 763- 427 -5860 FAX 763- 427 -0520 2 Date 09/30/16 www.haa— inc.com Lic. No. 18420 CRC CITY OF MONTI ELLO, MINNESOTA SHEETS 3395.04 CAMPING KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC, an Illinois Limited Liability Company, fee owner of the following described property situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, to wit: The part of Lot 1, Block 1, 90th Street 3rd Addition, which lies northeasterly of vacated Chelsea Court as dedicated in 90th Street Addition, Wright County, Minnesota. AND Lot 1, Block 1, 90th Street 2nd Addition, except that part platted as 90th Street 3rd Addition, Wright County, Minnesota. AND That part of Lot 1, Block 1, 90th Street 3rd Addition, Wright County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying Southwesterly of the Northeasterly line of Chelsea Court as depicted on the record plat of 90th Street Addition, said Wright County, Minnesota. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as CAMPING WORLD FIRST ADDITION. In witness whereof said FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC, an Illinois Limited Liability Company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of 20 FRHP LINCOLNSHIRE, LLC STATE OF COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this and Company, on behalf of the company. Signature Printed Name Notary Public, County, My commission expires _ SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE day of 20 by of FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC, an Illinois Limited Liability I Charles R. Christopherson do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey, that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of Charles R. Christopherson, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 18420 STATE OF COUNTY OF 20 The foregoing surveyors certificate was acknowledged before me this Minnesota License No. 18420. Signature Printed Name Notary Public, My commission expires County, CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA day of 20 by Charles R. Christopherson, Land Surveyor, This plat of CAMPING WORLD FIRST ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this day of 20 , and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. Mayor WRIGHT COUNTY SURVEYOR Clerk WRIGHT COUNTY TREASURER Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable in the year 20 on the land hereinbefore described have been paid this day of 20 Wright County Treasurer By Deputy WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER I hereby certify that this instrument was filed in the office of the County Recorder for record on this day of 20 at o'clock_ M. and was duly \ n \ recorded in Cabinet No. Sleeve as Document 1 Number CA 4 �. \o Wright County Recorder \� o,\ ei el �\ �° �o° / N' \ N 41 / 902yhSTRFr /y /i \ \ FT 2Ne of VV \\ a 96, �SSS, � � \ 0 R 7, \ F \ \ \ \�400 -69 %404 49 \ 4")° S �9 0, \ � asss" OroA /age U \ \\ op ti / /*t \ d 90ryy ST RFF� 3RpPer re �T \ gp0/T/oro _/ 00;;,/0 Q` I 1 Drainage & Utility Easement �o _ per record plat of 90TH �� L \ qC, j STREET 2ND ADDITION - South line of Lot 1, Block 1, 90TH STREET 2ND ADDITION \ L - - -- -� -- - - - - -- — —� - - - -- 1` — -- — _ �\ ------ - - - - -- CD- �\/ X 1 �6 Northeasterly line �� LOT 116 of vacated `_ North line of Lot 1, Block 1, I I �� Chelsea Court, as 1 ` dedicated in 90TH 90TH STREET 3RD ADDITION F- I I STREET ADDITION ^ w pro ` \ \ oU) °w <� of /o o o o 1 =n o o- 0, 90 o,~ o r y F o \ _o ot �,\ ent 7g \X yn D < I rn�o I -C y C O I 1 \ / <l `3/�'DAer r s28 \ \ �J o ° -O o_ I I °c E O Q V I qp ecor \ \ y \/ I \ LJ z m o o I o w° aN /11 ITI /1T A \ 1 T I ) r F T / VICINITY MAP NO SCALE SE 1/4 of SEC.10, T.121, R.25 I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this day of 20 SITE No 9TH rF Wright County Surveyor WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR I `�� Aq CyE�seq Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes on the land hereinbefore described on this plat and transfer entered this day I I PLACE of 20 OR NSgR00� ID Wright County Auditor By Deputy ° n nnITIr -\N I Is + I \ / LJ I �LJ \ 0, I \J I v I I\ I n \� Sod \ �� i e�or °9e 90Tyhs Ike \ RFFT 3 O' p ot; /;t / 61 r / R of RFFT 3��e o N61 ° A4 \ \ O q��/ f Opsej�e / Ro 4,0 4ot 4)54: \ \ \T 0� Ty nt /20 o'y %c \ / /r / \ / West line of Lot 1, \ / Block 1, 90TH STREET /) 2ND ADDITION / L \ A ITI N 1 ' IV / —�ULJI I I\JI v v `o L) z o_ L N � ao �a N o E of �M o� ww Tw F- V) D_ �3 ~ 0 O O) 0)_ O O S1 0 L 0 o a \ I �J �i 'a W r 0 z W N d' I� w w ON Cr_ r � F- 0) Y U O IM I ° J I o I — 7 G C� C� C� <I I N FOS'�o9e A/ t 1 \ \ So4th�este \ \ i / 2'v0 q0 g� A uei/;ty i ;he \ \ \ 0� STRF�T I �i < / op \ \ 4° I < I 90 Ty \ 1 S 16 4 T/d \ I N ' ' � 4,) \\ '1 9 >> I 433 ;800 6 � 4 � 3.19 S7524'49.' E / \ Go o 60 0 60 120 \ SCALE IN FEET p Denotes 1/2 inch by 14 inch iron monument set 1 INCH = 60 FEET and marked with Minnesota License No. 18420. • Denotes found iron monument BEARING ORIENTATION: The East line of Lot 1, Block 1, 90TH STREET 2ND ADDITION is assumed to bear N00'12'47 "E. —Q — Denotes Limited Access per Doc. No. 242685 Hakanson 111Anderson \ I \1VL_I\ \ A nnITlnN I \ L )L )I I I\JI N T \ Try P I1 41 / 902yhSTRFr /y /i \ \ FT 2Ne of VV \\ a 96, �SSS, � � \ 0 R 7, \ F \ \ \ \�400 -69 %404 49 \ 4")° S �9 0, \ � asss" OroA /age U \ \\ op ti / /*t \ d 90ryy ST RFF� 3RpPer re �T \ gp0/T/oro _/ 00;;,/0 Q` I 1 Drainage & Utility Easement �o _ per record plat of 90TH �� L \ qC, j STREET 2ND ADDITION - South line of Lot 1, Block 1, 90TH STREET 2ND ADDITION \ L - - -- -� -- - - - - -- — —� - - - -- 1` — -- — _ �\ ------ - - - - -- CD- �\/ X 1 �6 Northeasterly line �� LOT 116 of vacated `_ North line of Lot 1, Block 1, I I �� Chelsea Court, as 1 ` dedicated in 90TH 90TH STREET 3RD ADDITION F- I I STREET ADDITION ^ w pro ` \ \ oU) °w <� of /o o o o 1 =n o o- 0, 90 o,~ o r y F o \ _o ot �,\ ent 7g \X yn D < I rn�o I -C y C O I 1 \ / <l `3/�'DAer r s28 \ \ �J o ° -O o_ I I °c E O Q V I qp ecor \ \ y \/ I \ LJ z m o o I o w° aN /11 ITI /1T A \ 1 T I ) r F T / VICINITY MAP NO SCALE SE 1/4 of SEC.10, T.121, R.25 I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this day of 20 SITE No 9TH rF Wright County Surveyor WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR I `�� Aq CyE�seq Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes on the land hereinbefore described on this plat and transfer entered this day I I PLACE of 20 OR NSgR00� ID Wright County Auditor By Deputy ° n nnITIr -\N I Is + I \ / LJ I �LJ \ 0, I \J I v I I\ I n \� Sod \ �� i e�or °9e 90Tyhs Ike \ RFFT 3 O' p ot; /;t / 61 r / R of RFFT 3��e o N61 ° A4 \ \ O q��/ f Opsej�e / Ro 4,0 4ot 4)54: \ \ \T 0� Ty nt /20 o'y %c \ / /r / \ / West line of Lot 1, \ / Block 1, 90TH STREET /) 2ND ADDITION / L \ A ITI N 1 ' IV / —�ULJI I I\JI v v `o L) z o_ L N � ao �a N o E of �M o� ww Tw F- V) D_ �3 ~ 0 O O) 0)_ O O S1 0 L 0 o a \ I �J �i 'a W r 0 z W N d' I� w w ON Cr_ r � F- 0) Y U O IM I ° J I o I — 7 G C� C� C� <I I N FOS'�o9e A/ t 1 \ \ So4th�este \ \ i / 2'v0 q0 g� A uei/;ty i ;he \ \ \ 0� STRF�T I �i < / op \ \ 4° I < I 90 Ty \ 1 S 16 4 T/d \ I N ' ' � 4,) \\ '1 9 >> I 433 ;800 6 � 4 � 3.19 S7524'49.' E / \ Go o 60 0 60 120 \ SCALE IN FEET p Denotes 1/2 inch by 14 inch iron monument set 1 INCH = 60 FEET and marked with Minnesota License No. 18420. • Denotes found iron monument BEARING ORIENTATION: The East line of Lot 1, Block 1, 90TH STREET 2ND ADDITION is assumed to bear N00'12'47 "E. —Q — Denotes Limited Access per Doc. No. 242685 Hakanson 111Anderson 0) 0 z_ f— (n X W O T) 0) O T) 1`0 W f— Q E n Q / Ln cn O W 1 O CO 0- FD / N O 0 U U / O •• / �8" �,' / / 956.03 / to 956.08 \ / off' Qj , \ SAWCUT BITUMINOUS / PAVEMENT ADJACENT / / I TO CURB REMOVAL M SAWCUT AND REMOVE < ; (TYP.) BITUMINOUS PAVE MENT —\�� �° ° GPOO GP° J � / /� 0) I 1 ° d l I / 6 - - - -- C6- -- - - - -- — GR CO REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER G I I / (TYP.) CLEAR AND - - - - -�/ I/ I I / i/ GRUB TREE 0 4" (TYP.) i tx \ \g521 ~4 /IE 950,79 REMOVE 81-F 15" RCP \ \ AND APRON F ° \\ o`e�R I �\ \-- - - - - -- 958 - - - -- \� 1 ' I CI v 1 1 Storm MH RE= 957.81 c9 \\ \\\ \ B San MH '4° RE =90 9 to ��\ \ to \ / n \\\ or Ow e /F�(sF� s9 40 � IF(SW).94$80 Cl) � � 948 880 So\ \ % S 956.13 C � \�� �, /Fe s 'yN � \`� � \ \ \e�iQ RFa�"' M > co I 73 N\ wj 948 4o /F(yF) 99 87 9 0 O �CA4 CIV �R v D \ st 4-9" MH �/ � I ce jP IE(N),94 X80 0 e o )\94j80 D J 954..38 SAWCUT AND REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT mmmmmi 1 1 Gas _ 1 Meter N III II III / Elec. Cabinets I I 119 ° v° I d I ° � Elec. ° dTransformer ('(1 ° ° d v II I I�m ° av ° a l l I d as d R 'ice ° ° ° " v ° I d 1j� 4 °° d ° d d v l \ P- Q I 2 e J :D III s ° ° v ° d ° a CL 1 III I ° v I 11� ° ° I 1j d ° � 11 ° d a° v III II ° v ° ° v 1j d I n d v 955.00 I 11 ° ° J� II ° Cif \ ° II \ \ II ~ D \ \ m \ I m m CP II II \ II \ II \ y�o a m GENERAL NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE REMOVAL \\ OF UTILITIES AND LIGHTING. SEE SITE �\ PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. I / � / m D I')tl■ � — � 53.10 \ 8" Q/ \ C\ ♦ ♦♦ Zc�' LR \ m Cy- � \\ ♦ \ I m SAWCUT AND REMOVE ' BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 20 0 20 40 i � m / Q SCALE IN FEET c� DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Profession I Engineer under the laws of the State of Mi:neso . 0 DESIGNED BY: CJJ Hakanson A n d e rs o n Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 763- 427 -5860 FAX 763 - 427 -0520 www.hakanson— anderson.com CAMPING WORLD PARKING LOT EXPANSION EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND REMOVALS PLAN CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET C1 of C4 SHEETS DRAWN BY: TAE Date 10/5/16 Lic. No. 23461 CHECKED BY: CJJ 3395.04 0) 0 Z D Q CD O T) 0) 0 T) `0 / f— Q E w Q / U w 1 O w (�o n FD / N C Q) � I O 0 U U / O .. i 8„ X / GL= 957.76 (MATCH EXISTING) / ) / I / i I 0) _ to / I 0) GL I 957.00 Q I 1 CO\ / h % - - - - -- /f�G'p (0 I /� \- CB /MH #2 48" DIA. (R -2680) FL= 954.00 I 1 (N)INV= 951.00 Q 1 �v (S)INV= 950.75 1 F a 'A ---- 958- - - - - -- R CI 1 Storm MH 1 it it RE= 957.81 0 I II � lil i G DATE I REVISION / / I LEGEND 956.03 // LO 956.08 \\ PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PER C3 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE 10 B612 CONCRETE AND GUTTER PE STANDARD PLAT J (TYP.) e 64 � 9S S\ 0) \ \ Ai- C R orb \\�\ 9 8 o, \ \\\ /F(SF9s44o ` \\� 8 80 S �� (NF), /3 9s F F)o 948 D 2 ,F (NH)\ s48 s 48 / -d7 S ('/ \ I F N ��\ \\�� RC IE( )99435 P /E(N), ' 8p ' 954.65 \ \\ /FF 9s lE(SE 9148 800 1 p \ p J� 954 .3R / I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of I nesota.A 11 . 11 6 1 Date Lic. No. 23461 DESIGNED BY: CJJ DRAWN BY: TAE CHECKED BY: CJJ Hakanson Anderson Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 763 - 427 -5860 FAX 763 - 427 -0520 www.hakanson- anderson.com I G Wy GL= 957.40 11 /° III (MATCH 111 EXISTING) ilIi ° \ Elec. III / Cabinets - - - - -� III I I 11 GL= 956.81 I ° U (MATCH i1 EXISTING) II+ g _ III � II \ III I I 1 mJ� :D Ins CL I llm a < 1 II� a 1 III II ° I III 11 I II °d I IIn 955.00 II J� II A.4 GL= 95\ 5 \ 4 (MATCH \ \ Z' T111111111 111111111111111111111111111111 EXISTING) J \v� � \ m III m III \ I III � I III III I \ \\ ul III m � I II I III � CP � I III sa m D CL GL= 955.27 \ 56.00 I / (MATCH I / EXISTING) 1 / m -a- m Of J 7 I / 53.10 L= I �� elf 20 I 2�' LR m D Cl- m Ct / GL= 954.70 / �15z- \ \ GL= 954.83 l m � J GL =955.��/�f�� Q 6" /,/ (MATCH )55.00 ISTINGy�/ „ \ may, CAMPING WORLD PARKING LOT EXPANSION KW �--�� SILT FENCE PER C3 DRAINAGE ARROW GL= PROPOSED GUTTER LINE ELEVATION 908.55 BIT= PROPOSED BITUMINOUS ELEVATION 908.55 GENERAL NOTES: 1. PRIOR TO IMPORTING OR EXPORTING MATERIAL FROM THE SITE, CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PER 2 . C3 2. DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF ROUGH GRADING. 3. ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES SHALL BE PRECAST CONCRETE SECTIONS PER MN /DOT STANDARD PLATE 4020. REFERENCE NOTES: 5 1Q CONSTRUCT INFILTRATION BASIN PER C3 . ONLY LOW PRESSURE TYPE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE FOOTPRINT OF THE INFILTRATION BASIN. Q2 GEOTEXTILE FILTER SHALL BE PLACED UNDER THE CONCRETE FLUME PER (--J- . C4 1 (3 )CONSTRUCT MANHOLE PER C4 . ® 2 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE PER C4 I` x 20 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET C2 OF C4 SHEETS 3395.04 J_ Q W D 7f O LO O LO W Q W E W Q / N (n U W O Q0 fl- FD / N � Q) O 0 U U / O .. GENERAL CONSTRUCTION AND SOILS NOTES: 1. CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2016 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION ". 2. STRIP ALL INPLACE TOPSOIL IN AREAS TO BE DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION AND REUSE AS SLOPE DRESSING. IN AREAS OF PARKING LOT CONSTRUCTION, THE EXPOSED SAND SHALL BE SURFACE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 100% OF THE STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY, ASTM D698, IN AT LEAST THE UPPER 3 FEET. 3. UNLESS OTHERWISE RECOMMENDED IN THESE PLANS, THE GRADING SUBGRADE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF SUITABLE GRADING MATERIAL. THE FILL SHALL BE PLACED IN 8" TO 10" LOOSE LIFTS, AND COMPACTED TO 100% OF THE STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY. 4. SUITABLE GRADING MATERIAL FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL CONSIST OF ALL SOILS ENCOUNTERED WITH THE EXCEPTION OF TOPSOIL, SILT, DEBRIS, ORGANIC MATERIAL AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIAL. 5. PROVIDE A SAW CUT WHEN PLACING NEW PAVEMENT ADJACENT TO INPLACE PAVEMENT AND AT TERMINI OF CONSTRUCTION TO ENSURE A UNIFORM JOINT. 6. BITUMINOUS AND CONCRETE ITEMS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN /DOT SPEC. 2104.3. 7. USE TACK COAT BETWEEN ALL BITUMINOUS MIXTURES. THE BITUMINOUS TACK COAT MATERIAL SHALL BE APPLIED AT A UNIFORM RATE OF 0.05 GAL /SY TO 0.07 GAL /SY BETWEEN BITUMINOUS LAYERS. THE APPLICATION RATES ARE FOR UNDILUTED EMULSIONS. 8. PERFORMANCE GRADED (PG) ASPHALT BINDER PG 58 -28, SPEC. 3151, SHALL BE USED FOR ALL BITUMINOUS MIXES ON THIS PROJECT. SPECIFIC PG GRADES SHALL BE LISTED AT THE END OF THE MIX DESIGNATION NUMBER SHOWN ON THE TYPICAL SECTION. 9. THE BITUMINOUS MIXTURES SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SPECIFICATIONS 2360 AND 3139. 10. EXCEPT FOR THE INFILTRATION BASIN, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 4" OF TOPSOIL AND SOD. GENERAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. EROSION CONTROL SHALL CONFORM TO THE MN /DOT EROSION CONTROL HANDBOOK. 2. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ACQUIRE THE NECESSARY MPCA NPDES STORMWATER PERMIT. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES (BMP'S) PRIOR TO GRADING AND REMOVAL ACTIVITIES. BMP'S SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND POTENTIAL FOR EROSION HAS PASSED. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE HIS OPERATION TO MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF DISTURBED AREA AT ANY GIVEN TIME. 5. BMP'S SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY BY THE CONTRACTOR. OBSERVATIONS SHALL BE RECORDED IN THE INSPECTION LOG. 6. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FILE A NOTICE OF TERMINATION WITH THE MPCA AFTER FINAL STABILIZATION HAS BEEN APPROVED. REFERENCE NOTES: 1� PAVEMENT SECTION SHALL BE VERIFIED BY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. �2 CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT THE INFILTRATION BASIN WITH 48" HIGH ORANGE SAFETY FENCE PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. (3 ) IMPERVIOUS AREA CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE COMPLETE AND PERVIOUS AREAS SHALL BE ESTABLISHED WITH DENSE HEALTHY VEGETATION PRIOR TO INTRODUCING STORMWATER TO THE BASIN. ® CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MINIMIZED OVER THE FOOTPRINT OF THE BASIN. ONLY LOW PRESSURE, WIDE TRACKED EQUIPMENT SHALL BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION. 05 BASIN SHALL BE SEEDED WITH MN /DOT SEED MIX 35 -241 STARTING FROM THE TOP OF THE BASIN. SEED SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 73 LBS /ACRE. 10 2" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (SPWEA240B) BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 2" TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (SPNWB230B) 8" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE �_T � � �Z � l ► �_l » : Z � 1�I � �Z►Y�1: Z X1:7_1 �7 � BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION O PUBLIC ROAD NO SCALE RADIUS AS REQUIRED 6 IN. MIN. DEPTH OF 1 IN. TO 2 IN. 0 CRUSHED ROCK LO ENTRANCE WIDTH AS REQUIRED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PLASTIC ZIP TIES (50LB TENSILE) LOCATED IN TOP 8" DIRECTION OF RUNOFF FLOW zZ �w .. w o M M w N N 0 CL POST LENGTH, 5 FT. MIN. AT 6 FT. MAX. SPACING GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, 36" WIDTH MACHINE SLICE 8 " -12" DEPTH STANDARD MACHINE SLICED 6" a 899 1 1299 INTAKE 6„ N \ ' . i M a 899 1 1299 TIPOUT B612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PER MN /DOT STANDARD PLATE 7100 1 7 8612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PER MN /DOT STANDARD PLATE 7100 1 7 3 SILT FENCE DETAILS 4 CONCRETE CURB DETAILS C3 TO PROTECT AREAS FROM SHEET FLOW C3 NO SCALE (SEE SPEC. 3886) 4:1 Is i CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ANY---"- ORGANIC SOIL IN INFILTRATION AREA AND REPLACE WITH SIMILAR NATIVE SANDS WITH UNITED SOIL CLASSIFICATION OF SP OR SP —SM. COMPACTION SHALL BE MINIMIZED TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL. TOP OF PLACE CATEGORY 4 EROSION CONTROL BASIN -954.0 BLANKET PER MN /DOT SPECIFICATION 3885. ANCHOR TOP IN ONE FOOT TRENCH. 30TTOM OF 3ASIN= 950.00 I ELI 11 1 i� TOP OF EXISTING GRANULAR SOILS SCARIFY TOP 18" OF SOIL AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE INFILTRATION BASIN 02 03 A) NO SCALE DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was DESIGNED BY: DETAILS SHEET prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I Hakanson A n d ers 0 n am a duly Licensed Professiona Engineer under the laws CJJ CAMPING WORLD C3 of the State of innesot DRAWN BY: Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors of TAE 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 763 - 427 -5860 FAX 763 - 427 -0520 PARKING LOT EXPANSION C4 4CRAT J. CHUM CHECKED BY: www. hakanson— anderson.com CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEETS Date 10/5/16 Lic. No. 23461 CJJ 3395.04 J_ Q w 0 7f O LO 0 LO w Q Q� U w O Q0 CI- Q) o 0 U U O .. CL) R i 6" li s' it l,rV1YV1 \L I L PAVEMENT SECTION A —A T 6" r WA\ l►1 �9 �9 L- [-L- V —0 1t1t.,JJ PPr)F11 F AGGREGATE BACKFILL 10 .; M 0 LL- 0 w 0 H #5 REBAR (20' LONG) ELEV= 953.30 kNHOLE TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRECAST CONCRETE SECTIONS PRECAST CONCRETE MANHOLE BASE SLOPE FLOOR TO GROUT LINE SHALL BE UNIFORM SLOPE BETWEEN PIPE INVERTS LIrr1.1 A LJ M nG0A ^ASTING OR BOLT OLE COVER NGS). 11`11 LVI\P1L CONCRETE BASE kNHOLE TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRECAST CONCRETE SECTIONS CB /MH #2 DETAIL (STORM SEWER) NO SCALE 952 952 — G P —OH P —BUR T —BUR FO —BUR I LEGEND R O ® 0 o m 1111 EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE GAS MAIN specification, or report was direct supervision and that I al Engineer under the laws OVERHEAD ELECTRIC BURIED ELECTRIC BURIED TELEPHONE BURIED FIBER OPTIC EXISTING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING UTILITY POLE EXISTING UTILITY PEDESTAL EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING WATERMAIN VALVE EXISTING STORM SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EXISTING SIGN EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE EXISTING BOLLARD PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PROPOSED STORM SEWER SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER STRUCTURE r 1 --� C B/M H #1 C4 AND FLUME DETAIL No SCALE REFERENCE NOTES: 10 AGGREGATE BACKFILL SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF MN /DOT 3149.2H. 2 �— DETAIL NUMBER 3 -"w—SHEET NUMBER DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this plan, prepared by me or under my am a duly Licensed Professio of the State Minne ta. L L specification, or report was direct supervision and that I al Engineer under the laws DESIGNED BY: CJJ Hakanson A n d e rs o n Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 763 - 427 -5860 FAX 763 - 427 -0520 www. hakanson- anderson.com CAMPING WORLD PARKING LOT EXPANSION DETAILS AND PROJECT LEGEND CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA SHEET C4 of C4 SHEETS DRAWN BY: TAE Date 10/5/16 Lic. No. 23461 CHECKED BY: CJJ 3395.04 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan For Camping World Parking Lot Expansion Project Location: 3801 Chelsea Rd W. Monticello, Minnesota Owner: FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC 250 Parkway Drive Suite 270 Lincolnshire, IL 60069 Contact: John Kinghorn, Kinghorn Company Phone: (763) 428 -8088 Email: JohnK(c,Kinghornco.com Engineer: Hakanson Anderson 3601 Thurston Avenue Anoka, MN 55303 Contact: Craig Jochum, P.E. Phones: (763) 852 -0485 Email: craigj @haa- inc.com Date of Preparation: October 6, 2016 Prepared By: Hakanson Anderson 3601 Thurston Avenue Anoka, Minnesota 55303 Telephone: (763) 427 -5860 3395.04 - SWPPP TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. DESCRIPTION ............................................................................... ..............................1 2. LOCATION ..................................................................................... ..............................1 3. SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES .................... ..............................1 4. SITE CONSIDERATIONS ............................................................ ..............................2 4.1 Areas of Concern ................................................................ ..............................2 5. CONTROL MEASURES ............................................................... ..............................2 5.1 Areas of Concern ................................................................ ..............................2 5.2 Standard Control Measures ............................................ ............................... 2 -3 6. OTHER POTENTIAL STORMWATER POLLUTANTS .... ............................... 3 -4 7. EROSION CONTROL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE ..............................4 7.1 Erosion Control Inspection ................................................. ..............................4 7.2 Erosion Control Maintenance ............................................ ..............................5 8. DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING ................................ ..............................6 9. POST CONSTRUCTION SITE CONDITIONS ........................ ..............................6 10. PLAN AMENDMENTS ................................................................ ..............................6 11. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ............................................ ..............................6 12. NON - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT .................................. ..............................6 13. CONSTRUCTION CHEMICAL AND POLLUTANTS ........... ..............................7 13.1 Spill Prevention .............................................................. ............................... 7 -8 13.2 Spill Control Practices ....................................................... ..............................8 14. HOUSEKEEPING BMP'S ...................................................... ............................... 8 -9 15. SEED MIXES ................................................................................. ..............................9 16. LONG TERM MAINTENANCE ................................................. ..............................9 FIGURE 1— Proposed Drainage Areas APPENDIX A Location Map Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan Details TC -1 APPENDIX B Design Certifications Erosion Control Estimated Quantities APPENDIX C General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System /State Disposal System Program APPENDIX D Project Soil Information 3395.04 - SWPPP TC -2 1. DESCRIPTION This project will include a 70,573 square foot expansion of an existing bituminous parking lot in the City of Monticello, Minnesota. The work will include clearing and grubbing, removals, site grading, storm water improvements and restoration. This Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP) will satisfy the requirements of the NPDES General Permit No. MN R100001 for the State of Minnesota. This SWPPP is designed to (1) identify all potential sources of pollution which may reasonably be expected to affect stormwater discharges from the site; (2) describe the practices to be used to reduce pollutants in stormwater discharges from the site; and (3) assure compliance with the terms and conditions of the NPDES General Permit No. MN R100001. The SWPPP will be implemented at the site from the commencement of construction activity until the completion of final stabilization. Stormwater discharges from this site are subject to the City of Monticello and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency requirements. The project will begin this fall 2016 and be substantially completed by late fall 2016. 2. LOCATION This project is located within the municipal boundary of the City of Monticello. A location map is included in Appendix A. 3. SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES The order of construction activities for the project will be as follows: 1. Install perimeter silt fence. 2. Construct rock construction entrance. 3. Clear and grub trees. 4. Strip topsoil and rough grade site. 5. Install storm sewer. 6. Final grade site. 7. Install class 5 aggregate and bituminous for the parking lot. Seed, fertilize and mulch disturbed areas as shown on the Plans. 8. Remove accumulated sediment from the infiltration areas. 9. Remove silt fence and any other erosion control devices after final stabilization. Page 1 of 9 4. SITE CONSIDERATIONS 4.1 Areas of Concern: a) Generation of dust. b) Tracking onto existing roads. C) Washouts around perimeter of parking lot. d) Discharge into surface waters. 5. CONTROL MEASURES 5.1 Areas of Concern: a) Generation of dust: i) Dust control may become necessary. Water trucks may be required if dust control is needed. b) Tracking onto existing roads: i) Construction site entrances /exits must be inspected for evidence of sediment tracking onto paved surfaces. Tracked sediment shall be removed from paved surfaces within 24 hours. C) Washouts around perimeter of parking lot: i) Temporary erosion protection or permanent cover around the parking lot shall be installed within 7 days of completion of grading. d) Discharge to surface waters: i) Any temporary or permanent ditch or swale that drains water from any portion of the construction site must be stabilized within 200 lineal feet from the property edge or from the point of discharge into any surface water. Stabilization of the last 200 lineal feet must be completed within 24 hours after connecting to a surface water. 5.2 Standard Control Measures a) Temporary Rock Construction Entrance — A rock construction entrance is constructed of 1 " -2" washed rock installed at the proposed entrance and exit points for all construction vehicles. A detail for the rock construction entrance is included in Appendix B. This stone pad provides a tire cleaning mechanism for all vehicles leaving the site and will help reduce the amount of sediment tracked onto existing roads. b) Silt Fence — Silt fence is designed as a temporary sediment barrier consisting of a filter fabric attached to support posts. A silt fence detail is included in Appendix B. Page 2 of 9 C) Finished Grade Slopes — The site will be graded with 1:4 slopes or flatter. The flatter slopes will provide a less erosive surface. All disturbed areas, as shown on the construction plans, will be covered with seed, fertilizer and mulch. The site grading plan is included in Appendix A. d) Infiltration Areas — Three infiltration areas will be constructed to treat stormwater runoff from the project. Sediment has been scheduled to be removed after the placement of the aggregate surface. Side slopes will be graded to a 1:4 slope or flatter. e) Restoration — All exposed soil areas must be stabilized as soon as possible to limit soil erosion but in no case later than 7 days after the construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarily or permanently cease. All disturbed areas require topsoil, seed mixture and type 1 mulch, disk anchored, or erosion control blanket. The type and application rates of mulch, seed and fertilizer are shown on the plans. The restoration plan is included in Appendix A. f) Trash and Debris — All trash and construction debris from the site will be collected and deposited in a dumpster. The dumpsters shall be emptied as necessary. No construction materials shall be buried on site. All sanitary sewer waste will be collected from the portable units as required by local regulations. g) Horizontal Cat Tracking — Horizontal Cat Tracking shall be utilized on slopes as a Best Management Practice (BMP). 6. OTHER POTENTIAL STORMWATER POLLUTANTS Potential pollutant sources, including construction and waste materials, used or stored at the site are described in this section. By implementation of these BMPs these potential pollutant sources are not reasonably expected to affect the stormwater discharges from the site. Construction materials, chemicals, and waste materials that will be used or stored at the Site: Potential Pollutant Y or N Location Control Measure Antifreeze Y Various Secondary containment. Asphalt N/A Diesel Fuel Y Various Secondary containment. Fertilizer Y Kept with landscape contractor. Secondary containment. Gasoline Y In equipment,none stored. Secondary containment. Page 3 of 9 Glue /Adhesives Y Kept with contractor. Contractor responsible. Hydraulic oil /fluids Y Kept with contractor. Secondary containment. Paints Y Kept with contractor. Contractor responsible. Grease Y Kept with contractor. Secondary containment. Sanitary Waste Y Various Service provider to secure units from tipping over. Landscaping Materials Y Kept with landscape Contractor Contractor responsible. 7. EROSION CONTROL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE 7.1 Erosion Control Inspection Inspection will include a visual inspection of all disturbed areas of the site, material storage areas exposed to precipitation, sediment and erosion control measures, locations where vehicles enter or exit the construction site, and accessible discharge points (outfalls). The purpose of the inspections is to assess and determine whether erosion control measures are operating properly and effectively. Inspection reports will be completed at the time of inspection and certified as required by the applicable NPDES Phase 2 Stormwater Permit. The content of the inspection reports will address the required content for the inspection reports provided by the NPDES Phase 2 Stormwater Permit. Inspection reports will indicate whether any incidents of non - compliance with the requirements of the NPDES Phase 2 Stormwater Permit were observed and any conditions requiring any amendment to the SWPPP. All inspections and inspection reports at this site will be completed by a representative of the Contractor. Additional random inspections may be performed by the engineer's representative. The SWPPP Supervisor, or erosion control supervisor, will be familiar with all aspects of the SWPPP including the implemented BMP's and will complete regular inspections of the site. Inspections will be competed according to the schedule below: 1. Every 7 days. 2. Within 24 hours of the end of each rain event of 0.5 inches or more. When 6" of snow melt occurs. Page 4 of 9 7.2 Erosion Control Maintenance All erosion control measures shall be maintained in good working order. Necessary maintenance and repairs will be initiated within a 24 hour period of the maintenance and inspection report. A record of all the repairs shall be made within the report. 2. Exposed excavation areas shall be kept to a minimum by balancing cut and fill areas throughout the grading operation in accordance with the approved grading plan. 3. Silt fence will be inspected for depth of sediment. Built -up sediment shall be removed from all silt fence when it has reached one -third of the fence height. 4. Silt fence will be inspected for tears. Silt fence shall also be inspected to ensure the fabric is securely attached to the fence posts, and to see if the fence posts are firmly in the ground. 5. Infiltration areas will be monitored for depth of sediment. Sediment may have to be removed at the end of the project. 6. The seeding and mulching will be inspected for any bare spots and washouts. Additional measures may have to be employed to ensure healthy growth. 7. Erosion and sediment control measures and other BMPs will be maintained in effective operating condition. If inspections indicate that a BMP is not operating properly, maintenance or modification of the BMP will be performed as soon as possible and before the next storm event whenever practicable and no later than seven (7) calendar days from the inspection date, to ensure its continued effectiveness. 8. If additional BMPs are necessary, the additions will be made before the next storm event, whenever practicable and no later than seven calendar days from the inspection date. If implementation before the next storm event is not practicable, alternative BMPs will be used as soon as possible. 9. Sediment from sediment traps or sedimentation ponds will be routinely removed when design capacity of the trap or pond has been reduced by 50% or more. 10. Off site sediment shall be removed from all pavement surfaces within 24 hours of discovery. Page 5 of 9 8. DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING All water from dewatering or basin draining activities must be discharged in a manner that does not cause nuisance conditions, erosion in receiving channels or on downstream properties, or inundation in wetlands causing significant adverse impact to the wetland. The contractor shall be responsible for obtaining any permits required for the dewatering activities. 9. POST CONSTRUCTION SITE CONDITIONS Final stabilization requires that all soil disturbing activities at the site have been completed and all soils must be stabilized by a uniform perennial vegetative cover with a density of 70% over the entire pervious surface area, or other equivalent means necessary to prevent soil failure under erosive conditions. 10. PLAN AMENDMENTS The SWPPP will be amended if there is a change in design, construction, operation, maintenance, weather or seasonal conditions that has a significant impact on the discharge to surface waters or underground waters. The Plan will also be amended if it is proven to be inadequate in controlling pollutants in stormwater discharges due to construction activities. 11. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Figure 1 shows the proposed drainage areas. An effort has been made to account for all stormwater both entering and leaving the site. Most of the site's runoff will be collected and treated in the infiltration basin. Stormwater will drain from the parking lot to the infiltration basin. Those areas where stormwater cannot be collected by any of the systems listed above shall have the necessary temporary measures employed to reduce the risk of erosion and sediment contamination until permanent vegetative cover can be established. Great care shall be taken during the construction of the infiltration basin to protect them from erosion and sediment. Diversion berms or other devices shall be used to keep runoff and sediment away from the infiltration basin. Heavy equipment will not be allowed in infiltration basin. All work shall be performed with low pressure track type equipment. Only sandy type topsoil shall be allowed in infiltration areas as directed by the engineer. 12. NON - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Non - stormwater discharges will be eliminated or reduced to the extent feasible, with the exception to those necessary for the completion of certain construction activities. Authorized non - stormwater discharges from this site include: 1) Water used for dust control purposes. Page 6 of 9 2) Uncontaminated groundwater or spring water. 3) Uncontaminated excavation dewatering. 4) Pumping of detention basins or de- silting basins after rain events (using proper filtering devices per the General Permit Requirements). 5) Street Cleaning (where permitted). These authorized non - stormwater discharges will be conducted in accordance with the requirement of the NPDES Phase 2 permit, and every effort will be made to minimize non- stormwater runoff from these site activities. Non - stormwater discharges will be directed to treatment ponds whenever possible. 13. CONSTRUCTION CHEMICAL AND POLLUTANTS 13.1 SPILL PREVENTION The following are the material management practices that will be used to reduce the risk of spills or other accidental exposure of materials and substances to stormwater runoff • An effort will be made to store only enough product to do the required job. • All materials stored on site shall be stored in a neat and orderly manner. • All products shall be kept in their original container, with the original labels still attached, unless the containers are not re- sealable. • Substances shall not be mixed with one another unless recommended by the manufacturer. • Whenever possible, all of a product shall be used up before disposing of the container. • Manufacturer's recommendations for proper disposal shall be followed. • The site superintendent will routinely inspect the site to ensure proper disposal of all on site materials. Fertilizers: Fertilizers shall be applied only in minimum amounts as recommended by the manufacturer. Once applied, the fertilizer will be worked into the soil to limit the exposure to transient surface waters. Paints: All containers will be tightly sealed and stored when not required for use. Excess paint shall be properly disposed of in accordance with local regulations. Concrete Trucks: Concrete trucks (all construction equipment) will only be allowed to wash out in designated discharge areas. Page 7 of 9 Product Specific Practices — Petroleum Products: All onsite vehicles and equipment will be monitored for leaks and receive regular preventative maintenance to reduce the chance of leakage. Petroleum products will be stored in a tightly sealed container, which is clearly labeled. Any asphalt substances used onsite will be applied according to the manufacturer's recommendations. 13.2 SPILL CONTROL PRACTICES Spill Control Practices — • All spills will be cleaned up immediately after discovery, in accordance with the manufacturer's recommended methods. • The spill area will be kept well ventilated. • Spills of toxic or hazardous materials will be reported to the appropriate agencies. • A log of the spill type, location, date and time will be created by the job superintendent. The spill prevention plan will be adjusted to include measures to prevent this type of spill from occurring. 14. HOUSEKEEPING BMP'S a) Vehicle and equipment maintenance and repair activities at the site shall be performed in designated control areas. b) Solid materials, including building materials, garbage and debris shall be cleaned up daily and properly disposed of to prevent the discharge of these materials to surface waters or to storm drains. C) Equipment washout areas shall be provided on site. Equipment wash water shall be controlled to prevent unauthorized dry weather discharges and to avoid mixing with stormwater. d) Construction materials and chemicals used or stored on -site shall be kept in small quantities whenever possible. When not in use, they shall be stored in sealed containers and under cover to prevent direct contact with stormwater. Any inadvertent spills shall be cleaned up immediately upon discovery and the materials will be disposed of in accordance with local, state and federal requirements. e) Vehicle fueling shall be conducted in a location away from access to surface waters whenever practicable. On -site fuel storage tanks other than approved portable fuel containers such as gasoline cans, shall have a means of secondary containment and shall be located, whenever practicable, undercover. Any inadvertent spills shall be cleaned up immediately upon discovery and the materials will be disposed of in accordance with local, state and federal requirements. Page 8 of 9 f) Portable toilets shall be provided onsite. g) Strips of mature vegetation shall be preserved whenever possible. h) Clearing and grubbing material shall be chipped up and used for erosion control whenever possible. 15. SEED MIXES The site will be seeded as shown on the Plans. 16. LONG TERM MAINTENANCE FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC is responsible for the long term maintenance of the stormwater collection and treatment system for this project. Page 9 of 9 APPENDIX A Location Map Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan Details PROJECT LOCATION MAP APPENDIX B Design Certifications Erosion Control Estimated Quantities APPENDIX C General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System Program APPENDIX D Project Soil Information M „bT ,8b a£6 2 Q th C CC G �T+ U m Q �o U 8 m a N a 8 M v v Z Z a a 0069TOS 0089TOS OOL9TOS 0099TOS OOS9TOS Oob9TOS 00£9TOS OOZ9TOS M..B bb o£6 z a 8 a 8 m a I M (O M O o N � O LP —M ■ M U) S N O U) ` o a, lA n O m Z C N r9 1� Z A 0 °1 00 0 0 N En 0 L7 8 X ;^ a P zf o N C N pp Q O Q �O1 8 a o cu o .o � N v o � N �o N ch 3 Ln U (N(qq a N O h CL d M m 3 N zQ ZU v M„8 ,bb o£6 Q 3TOS =h z .Fi a m 0 N m C _ T C O U L i Q cu O U) Z O F- G O Z Ca G 0 Z W W J CL a) O O U1 N N N 7 U O C .: U U co, U (6 N O a U N N C U U7 . N Q a) N Q a) m a m a N E m p p N O 'a E (6 al Q ' a) U a m N E (U m a) — O = > w C) 3 a) — N O O C O N c a c N m ° w -.0 n E d "- a. a) Q m O M > m E mEcu O a = a O C ns C = ~ O (n a) N C U a) a) mn (6 C W E Q oN 1 ) � a) O 0 Q > ? O N O N m > �p O U N U � O O m (D O . C O) E Q U 0) a) a) p L U N O � a m a) � � m O n O ma N E a) i m t C cd w V U p i i y7y 0 2 O U Q N a) a) C M M O N C M N cn U u� L N a) a) O r N a) -� 0' Z o O- C 7a U W Na a)a," 2 Q cN E •N U m o 0- smra) c o0 U N O p- 0 .O Q L a) o N cn a Q m o L o@ m m m .0 0 `m N m w°) U 0 � 3 N N Q� N CO ''V � 3 E O c d) y o � `a. 7 N U 'p^ °? N c O m L a) (n N N Z O Q O O' a -O N m Co J> O N Q= C Q O N >p) >> O Z= E N Q U (6 C- r n L) -- a rn m _ (1) U) Q ? T m a) L m cu 4O N m a o= T - U) U) a) L3a 7 C a 7 c Qm N N O O— N E 0 0 0 6 0 a° ` Q 73 N N O C U U) i6 w •_ o a) N U C N 7 O `) Q N N a) a) a) j- p p m p Q .a � a) U ca o N m N> t a) — o a. E J) a� fl =o ¢ U F 05 w 1 ) � � c � Q > ? i N a) -O c O > �p N 3 c 1 N (D O . C O) E (0 — U a) m N Q O O O N C N C m LL U i m t 3 U p i i a (D t N y c Q N o Q O) Q'- > 'a 1 I O O m a o E T O a) I L Q N m M N T a) o N m N 3 a a) E N smra) 0) p w O m a O a >` O N O N m cu o a .n Ln w pC a a L y Q QN) O °? N O Q CU m E m E O N i- U .� O (O Cl) O O N fV � a) O N a T m 7 N O U) 'w m o (n Q O �U a3 0 N Z a) () N a) d U � 0 C No 0.0 iJ� Y 3 N f�U O ZU U) fL N � N M > > C N C m LL U m t Q m (n a. M 0 N N m m0 O N O. ¢ T w U J m E a) w° N o m p r n = Z' N N N O A O O ca. N to > N a) N = 0 O cn " c_ O a m E Z � U a) ' v ¢ m c y 0 CL m o N = N a m 0 a) = 0 cu N N m ... ... O ... co w 2 E m Z j n a .-. O O Q m D 0. m d � .- 0. m a m Q 0_ a) ,� a C_ U ? 3 3 N 0 O o d N m fV o •U. O o Cl) o ol N w T a) 0. o 0. a o d) o 3 u 0 U a a m = U- r o O m > o s o U m — — 3 N > > o m m a) (o) a=) Y U c a m Y m � a o m o m m` c > c N _ > a ¢ U) in U) a m mo C) v C� 0 J J � � 2 am � to in cn in cn a a 0 _ i al ri 7M4 "`' • '0 0 0 + ors `(Y m u N ® d a w (O Cl) O O N fV � a) O N a T m 7 N O U) 'w m o (n Q O �U a3 0 N Z a) () N a) d U � 0 C No 0.0 iJ� Y 3 N f�U O ZU U) fL Soil Map — Wright County, Minnesota Map Unit Legend Wright County, Minnesota (MN171) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 260 Duelm loamy sand, 0 to 2 5.9 3.9% percent slopes 406 Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 96.1 63.8% percent slopes 543 Markey muck, occasionally 3.2 2.1% ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes 1015 Udipsamments (cut and fill land) 2.2 1.5% 1030 Pits, gravel - Udipsamments 0.1 0.0 % complex 1288 Seelyeville and Markey soils, 3.4 2.3% ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes 1377B Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 2 to 8.7 5.8% 6 percent slopes 1377C Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 6 to 12.3 8.1% 12 percent slopes 1377E Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 20 4.1 2.7% to 35 percent slopes 1380A Bygland silt loam, map >25, 0 to 7.3 4.9% 2 percent slopes D67A Hubbard loamy sand, 7.4 4.9 % Mississippi River Valley, 0 to 2 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 150.7 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/6/2016 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Camping World Parking Lot Expansion Monticello, Minnesota October 6, 2016 Halcanson ll 1Anderson 3601 Thurston Avenue Anoka, Minnesota 55303 (763) 427 -5860 I hereby certify that this Plan, Specification or Report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of I i.nnesota. r - 23461 10/6/2016 Craig J. Jbc • um, PE Lic. No. Date S:\ PRIVATE \3300 \3395 \3395.04 \SMP \3395.04 SMP.docx TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................. ............................... i SUMMARY OF RESULTS .............................................. ............................... 1 FIGURES Figure 1 Drainage Areas Proposed Conditions APPENDIX — Drainage Calculations S:\ PRIVATE \3300 \3395 \3395.04 \SMP \3395.04 SMP.docx SUMMARY OF RESULTS GENERAL The proposed Camping World facility will be constructing a bituminous paved parking lot expansion. The proposed project will include clearing and grubbing, removals, site grading, stormwater improvements and parking lot construction. This site is located at 3801 Chelsea Road West in Monticello, Minnesota. The City of Monticello and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) dictate the stormwater requirements for this site. The stormwater facilities are based on their guidelines. STORMWATER REQUIREMENT Stormwater facilities will be constructed on site to meet the requirements of the MPCA and the City of Monticello. HydroCAD was used to model proposed conditions. Existing Conditions The existing site consists of an open field adjacent to the existing parking lot. This site drains to a regional stormwater pond that provides rate control and water quality. Volume control is required for this site. The volume control requirements will be met with the proposed infiltration basin in the southwest corners of the site. Proposed Conditions For the proposed conditions model, two drainage divides were used, which correspond to the infiltration basin and the proposed parking lot. The HydroCAD results for the 2 -, 10- and 100 -year storm events are included in the Appendix. VOLUME CONTROL The onsite soils are conducive to infiltration. An infiltration rate of 0.45 inches per hour has been assumed. The City of Monticello requires that a 1.1 -inch volume over the new impervious surface be infiltrated on site. The new impervious area is 70,533 square feet, which equals to a required volume of 6,466 cubic feet. A total of 6,546 cubic feet of infiltration volume is provided. Pretreatment ahead of the infiltration basin is accomplished with a sump manhole. The SHSAM model was used to calculate the removal efficiency of the sump manhole. The removal efficiency is 75 %. The SHSAM model results are included in the Appendix. 1 FIGURES Figure 1 — Drainage Areas Proposed Conditions [ 0 [ a 0 m Q u) • U / ff / / I ! I /! 1 ! I / I # I / '` / / /� /./ A \ h° I 4• h I I / 2^ / ! 2 S so\\ N 1B �9 - - - -- `�s )a J � AJA Y p� 3Ia I I 11 L� h 1� — — — — — — - 958 - — — — — — — St. NH RE- 95].81 \-� 1 1 'T \ I / / �h ! ! ! ! / I \ 1 r u% 956.Ofi 1 I I I I I I 1 / 1 / - - - - -- - - -- - - - -- -- -------- - - - - -- \\ / ! / / I \ I \ I \\ 9 � s6 1 / t9 o rn �� 11 1 �, 78 •, rn Rc/, \ / 0 954.fi5 a �\ > ' II/ \ 1 1 1 1 \1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I, 1 I I I I / / I / I / I / I / I / 1 / I j I t � \ I \ I \ I \ D \ V I I hll 1 i 'I 4 I 1 I I 955.00 I I I i J I J J C7 / / I / I / I / I / I � 24 cR \ 1 20 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET LEGEND 1 S SUBCATCHMENT NUMBER 1 B BASIN NUMBER DRAINAGE BOUNDARY DRAINAGE ARROW FIGURE 1 DRAINAGE AREAS PROPOSED CONDITIONS 3395.04 A -M Drainage Calculations Name Model Year Output "Removal" Efficiency ( %) Annual Load (Ibs) Load Removed (Ibs) Deposit (in) Number of Cleanings StandardSumps 42 1995 26 904.6 232.5 2.16 0 StandardSumps 44 1995 43 904.6 386.9 3.59 0 StandardSumps 55 1995 64 904.6 574.1 3.41 0 StandardSumps 63 1995 68 904.6 614.3 2.53 0 StandardSumps 66 1995 82 904.6 737 3.04 0 StandardSumps 86 1995 90 904.6 817.2 1.89 0 StandardSumps 106 1995 95 904.6 856.6 1.27 0 StandardSumps 42 1996 27 909.6 248.4 2.3 0 StandardSumps 44 1996 45 909.6 409.3 3.8 0 StandardSumps 55 1996 65 909.6 593.1 3.52 0 StandardSumps 63 1996 69 909.6 629.7 2.6 0 StandardSumps 66 1996 81 909.6 733.3 3.02 0 StandardSumps 86 1996 88 909.6 796.9 1.85 0 StandardSumps 106 1996 91 909.6 831.1 1.23 0 StandardSumps 42 1997 19 1085 210.4 1.95 0 StandardSumps 44 1997 32 1085 349.6 3.24 0 StandardSumps 55 1997 48 1085 520 3.09 0 StandardSumps 63 1997 51 1085 557.6 2.3 0 StandardSumps 66 1997 63 1085 681 2.81 0 StandardSumps 86 1997 73 1085 788.7 1.83 0 StandardSumps 106 1997 80 1085 869.1 1.29 0 StandardSumps 42 1998 25 794.4 195.1 1.81 0 StandardSumps 44 1998 41 794.4 322.4 2.99 0 StandardSumps 55 1998 60 794.4 473.7 2.81 0 StandardSumps 63 1998 64 794.4 506 2.09 0 StandardSumps 66 1998 76 794.4 605.4 2.5 0 StandardSumps 86 1998 85 794.4 678.1 1.57 0 StandardSumps 106 1998 91 794.4 720.9 1.07 0 StandardSumps 42 1999 29 493.7 143.2 1.33 0 StandardSumps 44 1999 48 493.7 234.7 2.18 0 StandardSumps 55 1999 69 493.7 339 2.01 0 StandardSumps 63 1999 73 493.7 360.2 1.48 0 StandardSumps 66 1999 85 493.7 419.8 1.73 0 StandardSumps 86 1999 92 493.7 456 1.06 0 StandardSumps 106 1999 96 493.7 473.4 0.7 0 StandardSumps 42 2000 20 996.1 204.4 1.9 0 StandardSumps 44 2000 34 996.1 341 3.16 0 StandardSumps 55 2000 51 996.1 511.6 3.04 0 StandardSumps 63 2000 55 996.1 550 2.27 0 StandardSumps 66 2000 68 996.1 676.7 2.79 0 StandardSumps 86 2000 78 996.1 780.1 1.81 0 StandardSumps 106 2000 85 996.1 847.6 1.26 0 StandardSumps 42 2001 28 794.8 218.3 2.02 0 StandardSumps 44 2001 45 794.8 360.6 3.34 0 StandardSumps 55 2001 66 794.8 527.1 3.13 0 StandardSumps 63 2001 71 794.8 561.5 2.31 0 StandardSumps 66 2001 83 794.8 662.1 2.73 0 StandardSumps 86 2001 91 794.8 725.3 1.68 0 StandardSumps 106 2001 95 794.8 756.5 1.12 0 StandardSumps 42 2002 24 875.7 206.9 1.92 0 StandardSumps 44 2002 39 875.7 344 3.19 0 StandardSumps 55 2002 58 875.7 511.2 3.03 0 StandardSumps 63 2002 63 875.7 547.9 2.26 0 StandardSumps 66 2002 76 875.7 664.2 2.74 0 StandardSumps 86 2002 86 875.7 751.3 1.74 0 StandardSumps 106 2002 92 875.7 801.5 1.19 0 StandardSumps 42 2003 24 818.6 200.3 1.86 0 StandardSumps 44 2003 40 818.6 330.2 3.06 0 StandardSumps 55 2003 59 818.6 481.8 2.86 0 StandardSumps 63 2003 63 818.6 513.1 2.11 0 StandardSumps 66 2003 74 818.6 605.9 2.5 0 StandardSumps 86 2003 82 818.6 671.2 1.56 0 StandardSumps 106 2003 87 818.6 712 1.06 0 StandardSumps 42 2004 27 791.7 217 2.01 0 StandardSumps 44 2004 45 791.7 358.6 3.33 0 StandardSumps 55 2004 66 791.7 524.3 3.11 0 StandardSumps 63 2004 70 791.7 558.5 2.3 0 StandardSumps 66 2004 83 791.7 658.3 2.71 0 StandardSumps 86 2004 91 791.7 720.6 1.67 0 StandardSumps 106 2004 95 791.7 751.5 1.12 0 StandardSumps 42 2005 20 987.8 200.9 1.86 0 StandardSumps 44 2005 34 987.8 336.7 3.12 0 StandardSumps 55 2005 52 987.8 510.3 3.03 0 StandardSumps 63 2005 56 987.8 550.4 2.27 0 StandardSumps 66 2005 70 987.8 686.6 2.83 0 StandardSumps 86 2005 81 987.8 799.9 1.85 0 StandardSumps 106 2005 88 987.8 871.4 1.29 0 StandardSumps 42 2006 24 572.4 140 1.3 0 StandardSumps 44 2006 40 572.4 230.5 2.14 0 StandardSumps 55 2006 59 572.4 336.7 2 0 StandardSumps 63 2006 63 572.4 359.4 1.48 0 StandardSumps 66 2006 74 572.4 425.3 1.75 0 StandardSumps 86 2006 82 572.4 469.9 1.09 0 StandardSumps 106 2006 86 572.4 495.3 0.74 0 StandardSumps 42 2007 20 665.4 135 1.25 0 StandardSumps 44 2007 34 665.4 225.6 2.09 0 StandardSumps 55 2007 51 665.4 341.1 2.02 0 StandardSumps 63 2007 55 665.4 368.1 1.52 0 StandardSumps 66 2007 69 665.4 457 1.88 0 StandardSumps 86 2007 80 665.4 529.8 1.23 0 StandardSumps 106 2007 87 665.4 576.6 0.86 0 Name Model Total Load (Ibs) Total Load Removed (Ibs) Removal Efficiency ( %) Model Height (ft) Model Diameter (ft) Pipe Diameter (inches) StandardSumps 42 10690 2552 23.9 2 4 15 StandardSumps 44 10690 4230 39.6 4 4 15 StandardSumps 55 10690 6244 58.4 5 5 18 StandardSumps 63 10690 6677 62.5 3 6 24 StandardSumps 66 10690 8012 75 6 6 24 StandardSumps 86 10690 8985 84.1 6 8 30 StandardSumps 106 106901 9563 89.51 61 101 36 Precipitation Frequency Data Server http : / /hds e.nws.no aa. gov/hds c /pfds /pfds _printpage. html ?lat =45.3 016... NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 8, Version 2 based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches)1 Location name: Monticello, Minnesota, USA* � Latitude: 45.3016 °, Longitude: - 93.8175° "'14 ' Elevation: 938.5 fr*- `source: ESRI Map s 25 source: USGS 100 POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES 500 Senile Pedca, Deborah Martin, Sandra Pavlovic, Ishani Roy, Mchael St. Laurent, Cad Trypaluk Dale Unruh, Mchael Yenta, Geoffery Bonnin 0.375 NOAH, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland PF tabular I PF graphical I Maps & aerials PF tabular PDS- based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches)1 L Average recurrence interval (years) Duration JE �-- -- - - - --- ' JO== 10 25 60 -] 100 200 500 1000 0.375 0.440 0.547 0,638 0.767 0.869 0.973 1.08 1.23 1.34 5 -mtn (0.310- 0.459) (0.362 - 0.537) (0.449- 0.670) (0.521 - 0.785) (0.605.0.973) (0:668- 1_11)l (0.721-1.28) (0.766 -1.45) (0.834 -1.69) (0.886 -1_87) 10 0.550 0.644 0.801 0.934 1.12 1.27 1.43 1.58 1.80 1.96 -min 1(0.454-0.671)1(0.531-0.787)1(0.658-0.981)1(0.763-1.15) (0.885 -1.42) 1(0.978-1.63)1(1.05-1.87) (1.12 -2.13) (1.22 -2.47) (1.30 -2.74) 0.671 0.785 0.977 1.14 1.37 1.55 1.74 1.93 2.19 2.40 15 -min (0.553 - 0.819); (0.647- 0_959) (0.802 -1.20) (0.930 -1.40) (1.08_1.74)_ (1.19 -1.99) (1.29 - 2.28) (1.37 -2.59) (1.49 -3.02) (1.58 -3.34) 0.903 1.06 1.33 1.55 1.87 2.-137F2.-38 2.65 3.01 3.29 30 -mrn (0.745 -1.10) (0.876_1_30) (1.09 -1_63) (1.27 =1.91) (1.48 -2.38) l (1.63 -2.73) (1.76 -3.12) (1.88 -3.56) (2.04 -4.14) (2.17 -4.5B) 1.15 1.36 1.71 2.02 2.46 2.82 3.19 3.58 4.11 4.53 60 -min 0 1(0.946-1.40) (1.12 -1.66) (1.41 -2.10) 1 (1.65 -2.49) 11 (1.95 -3.14) (2.17 -3.63) (2.37 -4.19) (2.54 -4.81) (2.79 -5.66) (2.99 -6.31) 1.39 1.65 2.10 2.49 3.06 3.52 4.00 4.50 5.21 5.76 2 -hr ( 1 .15 -1.68) (1.37 -2.00) (1.74 -2.55) (2.04 -3.04) (2.43 -3.87) (2.73 -4.50) (2.98 -5.22) (3.22 -6.03j (3.57 -7.14) (3.83 -7.98) 1.54 1.84 3.46 4.00 4.58 5.19 . 6.04 6.72 3 -hr (129 -1.86) (1.53 -2.22) (1.95 -2.84) (2.31 -3.40) (2.77 -4.37) (3.12 -5.11) (3.44 -5.97) (3.72 -6.92) (4.16 -8.26) (4.49 -9.27) 183 2.17 -2.35 2.76 -2.80 3.30 4.11 4.78 5.49 6.26 7.34 8.21 F6 --h IF (1:53 -2.19) (1.82 -2.59) (2.31 -3.32) (2.74 -3.98) (3.32 -5.17) (3.75 -6.06 ) (4.15 -7.12) (4.53 -8.30 ) (5.09 -9.97) 212 2.50 3.16 3,76 4.66 5.41 6.22 7.09 8.32 9.31 12 -hr (1.80 -2.52) (2.11 -2.97) (2.66 -3.76) (3.14 - 4.49) 1 (3.79 -5.82) -6.82) (4.74 -8.01) (5.17 -9.34) (5.81 -11.2) (6.30 -12.7) 2 43 2,84 3.57 4.22 5.19 .(4.28 6 00 6 ^86 7.78 9.08 10.1 n24 -hr (2.07 -2.86) -3.35) (3.02 4.22) (3.55 -5:01) (4.25 -6.42) (4.78-7.49) (526 8.75) (5.71 -10.2) 1(6.39-12.2)11(6.90-13.7)1 . 2'77 .(2.42 3.23 4.02 4.71 5.74 6.55 7.47 . 8.41 . 9.73 10.8 2 -day (2.38 -3.24) (2.76 -3.78) (3.43 -4.71) (4.00 -5.55) 1 (4.72 -7.03) (5.27 -8.14) (5.76 9.44) (6.21 -10.9) (6.B9 -12.9) (7.40 -14.5) 3.06 3.51 4.29 4.99 6.02 6.87 7.77 8.73 10.1 7F 11.2 3 -day (2.64 -3.56) (3.02 -4.09) (3.68 -5.01) - 5.85) (4.96 -7.34) (5.53 -8.46) (6.03 -9.79j (6.48 -11.3) (7.17 -13.3) (7.69 -14.9) 3.30 3.75 4.54 _(4.25 5.25 6.30 7.17 8.10 9.08 10.5 11.6 4 -day (2.85 -3.82) (323-435)J(3.90 -5.29) (4.49 -6.14) (5.23 -7.66) (5_79_8.81) (6_30- 10.2)J (6.76 -11.7) (7.47_13:8) (8.01 -15.4) 3.83 4.36 5.28 6.08 7.26 8.22 9.22 10.3 11.8 13.0 7 -day 3 (.33 -4.42) 11 (3.78 -5.03) 1 (4.56 -6.10) (5.22 -7.06) (6.04 -8.74) (6.67 -10.0) 1(7.21-11.5)11(7.69-13.1) (8.45 -15.4) (9.01 -17.2) 4.32 4.92 5.92 6.80 8.06 10.1 11.2 12.8 14.0 10 -day (3.77-4.96) (4.28 -5.65) (5.14 -6.82) (5.86 -7.86) (6.73 -9.64) 1(7.38-11.0)11(7.94-12.6)]1(8,43-14.3) ( 9.19 -16.6 ) ( 9.76-18.4) 5.89 6.58 7.73 8.70 10.1 -9.08 11.1 12.2 13.4 14.9 16.1 20 -day (5.17-6.71 ) ( 5.77 -7.50) (6.75- 8.83) (7.56 -9.98) (8.44 -11.9 ) 1(9.11-13.3)11(9.65-16.0) (10.1 -16.8) (10.8 -19.2) (11.3 -21.0) 7.27 8.08 9.39 10.5 12.0 13.1 14.2 15.4 16.8 18.0 30 -day (6_41 -8.24) (7_11 -9_16) (6.24 -10.7) (9.13 -12.0) (10.0 -14.0) (10.7 -15.5) (11.2 -17.3) (11.6 -19.2) (12.2 -21.6) (12.7 -23.4) 9.03- 11.7 13.0 14.7 16.0 17.2 18.4 21.0- 45 -day (8.00 -10.2) (8.90 -114) (103 -13.2) (11.4 -14.8) (12.4 -17.1) (13.2 -18.9) (13.7 -20.8) (14.0 -22.8) (14.5 -25.3) (14.9 -27.2) 10.5 -10.1 11.8 - 13.8 15.4 17.4 - 18.9 20.2 21.5 23.0 24.1 60 -dav J (9.37 --5 (10.5 -13.3) (12.2 -15.6) (13.5 -17.5) (14.7 -20.1) (15.6 -22.1) (16.1 -24.3) (16.3 -26.5) (16.8 -29.1) (17.1 -31.1 ) 1 Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS). Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates (for a given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds are not checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values. Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information. Back to Top PF graphical 1 of 3 10/5/2016 1:21 PM 2S 1 B � sump � 1 S Basin DA Infiltration Basin Sump Manhole Parking Lot Subcat Reach Pon Link Proposed Conditions October 6, 2016 Type 1124 -hr 1.1 Inch Storm Rainfall= 1. 10" Prepared by Hakanson Anderson Printed 10/6/2016 HydroCADO 10.00 -17 s/n 01341 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Time span =5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt =0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method - Pond routing by Stor -Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Parking Lot Runoff Area =1.790 ac 94.41 % Impervious Runoff Depth >0.67" Tc =7.0 min CN =96 Runoff =2.12 cfs 0.100 of Subcatchment 2S: Basin DA Runoff Area =0.330 ac 0.00 % Impervious Runoff Depth = 0.00" Tc =7.0 min CN =61 Runoff =0.00 cfs 0.000 of Pond 1B: Infiltration Basin Peak EIev= 951.40' Storage =4,139 cf Inflow =2.10 cfs 0.095 of 15.0" Round Culvert n =0.011 L =10.0' S=0.110007 Outflow =0.00 cfs 0.000 of Pond Sump: Sump Manhole Peak EIev= 953.18' Storage =284 cf Inflow =2.12 cfs 0.100 of Outflow =2.10 cfs 0.095 of Total Runoff Area= 2.120 ac Runoff Volume= 0.100 of Average Runoff Depth= 0.57" 20.28% Pervious = 0.430 ac 79.72% Impervious = 1.690 ac Proposed Conditions October 6, 2016 Type 11 24 -hr 1.1 Inch Storm Rainfall= 1.10" Prepared by Hakanson Anderson Printed 10/6/2016 HydroCAD810.00 -17 s/n 01341 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Parking Lot Runoff = 2.12 cfs @ 11.98 hrs, Volume= 0.100 af, Depth> 0.67" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 1.1 Inch Storm Rainfall= 1.10" Area (ac) CN Description 1.690 98 Paved parking, HSG B 0.100 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 1.790 96 Weighted Average 0.100 5.59% Pervious Area 1.690 94.41% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) ( ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Basin DA Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af, Depth= 0.00" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 1.1 Inch Storm Rainfall= 1.10" Area (ac) CN Description 0.330 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.330 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Pond 1B: Infiltration Basin Inflow Area = 2.120 ac, 79.72% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.54" for 1.1 Inch Storm event Inflow = 2.10 cfs @ 11.99 hrs, Volume= 0.095 of Outflow = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af, Atten= 100 %, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 951.40'@ 20.00 hrs Surf.Area= 3,698 sf Storage= 4,139 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: initial storage exceeds outflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= (not calculated: no outflow) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 950.00' 19,779 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 950.00 2;222 0 0 951.00 3,259 2,741 2,741 952.00 4,351 3,805 6,546 953.00 5,732 5,042 11,587 954.00 10,652 8,192 19,779 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 952.00' 15.0" Round Culvert L= 10.0' RCP, end - section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 952.00'1951.00' S=0.10007' Cc= 0.900 n=0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 1.23 sf Primary OutFlow Max--0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW= 950.00' (Free Discharge) L1= Culvert ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond Sump: Sump Manhole Inflow Area = 1.790 ac, 94.41% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.67" for 1.1 Inch Storm event Inflow = 2.12 cfs @ 11.98 hrs, Volume= 0.100 of Outflow = 2.10 cfs @ 11.99 hrs, Volume= 0.095 af, Atten= 1 %, Lag= 0.6 min Primary = 2.10 cfs @ 11.99 hrs, Volume= 0.095 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 953.18' @ 11.99 hrs Surf.Area= 653 sf Storage= 284 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 30.6 min calculated for 0.095 of (95% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 11.8 min ( 782.3 - 770.6 ) Proposed Conditions October 6, 2016 Type Il 24 -hr 1.1 Inch Storm Rainfall = 1.10" Prepared by Hakanson Anderson Printed 10/6/2016 HydroCAD@ 10.00 -17 s/n 01341 @2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC pa9e4 Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 945.00' 2,018 of Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 945.00 28 0 0 953.00 28 224 224 954.00 3,560 1,794 2,018 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Device 2 953.00' NEENAH R- 1792-JG Head (feet) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 Disch. (cfs) 0.000 1.000 2.800 5.200 8.000 11.100 #2 Primary 951.00' 8.0" Round Culvert L= 13.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 951.00'/ 950.80' S= 0.0154T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.35 sf #3 Primary 953.20' 6.0' long x 0.5' breadth Broad - Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max--2.28 cfs @ 11.99 hrs HW= 953.17' (Free Discharge) �2= Culvert (Inlet Controls 2.28 cfs @ 6.53 fps) t R 1= NEENAH - 1792 -JG (Passes 2.28 cfs of 2.33 cfs potential flow) 3= Broad- Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Proposed Conditions October 6, 2016 Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall= 2.84" Prepared by Hakanson Anderson Printed 10/6/2016 HvdroCAD ®10.00 -17 s/n 01341 © 2016 HVdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paoe 5 Time span =5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt =0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method - Pond routing by Stor -Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Parking Lot Runoff Area =1.790 ac 94.41 % Impervious Runoff Depth >2.24" Tc =7.0 min CN =96 Runoff =6.56 cfs 0.334 of Subcatchment 2S: Basin DA Runoff Area =0.330 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth >0.26" Tc =7.0 min CN =61 Runoff =0.11 cfs 0.007 of Pond 1B: Infiltration Basin Peak Elev= 952.52' Storage =8,987 cf Inflow =6.29 cfs 0.336 of 15.0" Round Culvert n =0.011 L =10.0' S= 0.1000'P Outflow =1.18 cfs 0.173 of Pond Sump: Sump Manhole Peak Elev= 953.56' Storage =784 cf Inflow =6.56 cfs 0.334 of Outflow =6.19 cfs 0.329 of Total Runoff Area = 2.120 ac Runoff Volume = 0.342 of Average Runoff Depth = 1.93" 20.28% Pervious = 0.430 ac 79.72% Impervious = 1.690 ac Proposed Conditions October 6, 2016 Type 11 24-hr 2 -Year Rainfall= 2.84" Prepared by Hakanson Anderson Printed 1016/2016 HvdroCAD®10.00 -17 s/n 01341 02016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Parking Lot Runoff = 6.56 cfs @ 11.98 hrs, Volume= 0.334 af, Depth> 2.24 Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall = 2.84" Area (ac) CN Description 1.690 98 Paved parking, HSG B 0.100 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 1.790 96 Weighted Average 0.100 5.59% Pervious Area 1.690 94.41 % Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Basin DA Runoff = 0.11 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.007 af, Depth> 0.26" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall= 2.84" Area (ac) CN 0.330 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.330 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Pond 1B: Infiltration Basin Inflow Area = 2.120 ac, 79.72% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.90" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 6.29 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.336 of Outflow = 1.18 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 0.173 af, Atten= 81 %, Lag= 12.5 min Primary = 1.18 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 0.173 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 952.52'@ 12.21 hrs Surf.Area= 5,067 sf Storage= 8,987 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 181.3 min calculated for 0.172 of (51% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 103.4 min ( 857.8 - 754.4 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 950.00' 19,779 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 950.00 2,222 0 0 951.00 3,259 2,741 2,741 952.00 4,351 3,805 6,546 953.00 5,732 5,042 11,587 954.00 10,652 8,192 19,779 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 952.00' 15.0" Round Culvert L= 10.0' RCP, end - section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 952.00'/951.00' S=0.10007' Cc= 0.900 n=0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 1.23 sf Primary OutFlow Max =1.17 cfs @ 12.21 hrs HW= 952.52' (Free Discharge) t-1= Culvert (Inlet Controls 1.17 cfs @ 2.45 fps) Summary for Pond Sump: Sump Manhole Inflow Area = 1.790 ac, 94.41 % Impervious, Inflow Depth> 2.24" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 6.56 cfs @ 11.98 hrs, Volume= 0.334 of Outflow = 6.19 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.329 af, Atten= 6 %, Lag= 1.5 min Primary = 6.19 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.329 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 953.56'@ 12.00 hrs Surf.Area= 1,989 sf Storage= 784 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 13.6 min calculated for 0.329 of (98% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 6.8 min ( 752.1 - 745.4 ) Proposed Conditions October 6, 2016 Type 11 24 -hr 2- Year Rainfall=2.84 " Prepared by Hakanson Anderson Printed 10/6/2016 HydroCAD®10.00 -17 s/n 01341 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 945.00' 2,018 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 945.00 28 0 0 953.00 28 224 224 954.00 3,560 1,794 2,018 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Device 2 953.00' NEENAH R- 1792 -JG Head (feet) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 Disch. (cfs) 0.000 1.000 2.800 5.200 8.000 11.100 #2 Primary 951.00' 8.0" Round Culvert L= 13.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 951.00'/ 950.80' S= 0.0154 'P Cc--0.900 n=0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.35 sf #3 Primary 953.20' 6.0' long x 0.5' breadth Broad- Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max--6.14 cfs @ 12.00 hrs HW= 953.55' (Free Discharge) �2= Culvert (Inlet Controls 2.50 cfs @ 7.17 fps) t 2 -J 7= NEENAH R- 179G (Passes 2.50 cfs of 11.10 cfs potential flow) 3= Broad - Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 3.63 cfs @ 1.72 fps) Proposed Conditions October 6, 2016 Type// 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall= 4.22" Prepared by Hakanson Anderson Printed 10/6/2016 HydroCAD(@10.00 -17 s/n 01341 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Time span =5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt =0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method - Pond routing by Stor -Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Parking Lot Runoff Area =1.790 ac 94.41 % Impervious Runoff Depth >3.50" Tc =7.0 min CN =96 Runoff =10.01 cfs 0.522 of Subcatchment 2S: Basin DA Runoff Area =0.330 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth >0.82" Tc =7.D min CN =61 Runoff =0.48 cfs 0.023 of Pond 113: Infiltration Basin Peak Elev= 953.13' Storage= 12,365 cf Inflow =9.93 cfs 0.540 of 15.0" Round Culvert n =0.011 L =10.0' S= 0.1000'/' Outflow =4.22 cfs 0.373 of Pond Sump: Sump Manhole Peak Elev= 953.72' Storage =1,167 cf Inflow =10.01 cfs 0.522 of Outflow =9.45 cfs 0.517 of Total Runoff Area = 2.120 ac Runoff Volume = 0.545 of Average Runoff Depth = 3.08" 20.28% Pervious = 0.430 ac 79.72% Impervious = 1.690 ac Proposed Conditions October 6, 2016 Type// 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall= 4.22" Prepared by Hakanson Anderson Printed 10/612016 HydroCAD®10.00 -17 s/n 01341 02016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Parking Lot Runoff = 10.01 cfs @ 11.98 hrs, Volume= 0.522 af, Depth> 3.50" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall= 4.22" Area (ac) CN Descriotion 1.690 98 Paved parking, HSG B 0.100 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 1.790 96 Weighted Average 0.100 5.59% Pervious Area 1.690 94.41 % Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) ( ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Basin DA Runoff = 0.48 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.023 af, Depth> 0.82" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall= 4.22" Area (ac) CN Descriotion 0.330 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.330 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Pond 113: Infiltration Basin Inflow Area = 2.120 ac, 79.72% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.05" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 9.93 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.540 of Outflow = 4.22 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.373 af, Atten= 58 %, Lag= 8.3 min Primary = 4.22 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.373 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 953.13'@ 12.14 hrs Surf.Area= 6,365 sf Storage= 12,365 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 138.3 min calculated for 0.372 of (69% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 73.4 min ( 820.6 - 747.2 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 950.00' 19,779 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation SUrf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 950.00 2,222 0 0 951.00 3,259 2,741 2,741 952.00 4,351 3,805 6,546 953.00 5,732 5,042 11,587 954.00 10,652 8,192 19,779 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 952.00' 15.0" Round Culvert L= 10.0' RCP, end - section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 952.00'/ 951.00' S= 0.1000 T Cc= 0.900 n=0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 1.23 sf Primary OutFlow Max--4.20 cfs @ 12.14 hrs HW= 953.12' (Free Discharge) t-1= Culvert (Inlet Controls 4.20 cfs @ 3.61 fps) Summary for Pond Sump: Sump Manhole Inflow Area = 1.790 ac, 94.41% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.50" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 10.01 cfs @ 11.98 hrs, Volume= 0.522 of Outflow = 9.45 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.517 af, Atten= 6 %, Lag= 1.5 min Primary = 9.45 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.517 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 953.72' @ 12.00 hrs Surf.Area= 2,581 sf Storage= 1,167 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 9.5 min calculated for 0.517 of (99% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 4.9 min ( 743.7 - 738.9 ) Proposed Conditions October 6, 2016 Type 1124 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall= 4.22" Prepared by Hakanson Anderson Printed 10/6/2016 HydroCAD®10.00 -17 s/n 01341 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 945.00' 2,018 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 945.00 28 0 0 953.00 28 224 224 954.00 3,560 1,794 2,018 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Device 2 953.00' NEENAH R- 1792 - JG Head (feet) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 Disch. (cfs) 0.000 1.000 2.800 5.200 8.000 11.100 #2 Primary 951.00' 8.0" Round Culvert L= 13.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 951.00'/ 950.80' S= 0.0154T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.35 sf #3 Primary 953.20' 6.0' long x 0.5' breadth Broad - Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 Coef. (English) 2.80 2,92 3.08 3.30 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max =9.40 cfs @ 12.00 hrs HW= 953.72' (Free Discharge) �2= Culvert (Inlet Controls 2.60 cfs @ 7.44 fps) t1= NEENAH R- 1792.JG (Passes 2.60 cfs of 11.10 cfs potential flow) 3= Broad - Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 6.80 cfs @ 2.18 fps) Proposed Conditions October 6, 2016 Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall = 6.86" Prepared by Hakanson Anderson Printed 10/6/2016 HydroCAD(9) 10.00 -17 s/n 01341 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Time span =5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt =0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Stor- Ind +Trans method - Pond routing by Stor -Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Parking Lot Runoff Area =1.790 ac 94.41% Impervious Runoff Depth >5.90" Tc =7.0 min CN =96 Runoff=16.53 cfs 0.880 of Subcatchment 2S: Basin DA Runoff Area =0.330 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth >2.36" Tc =7.0 min CN =61 Runoff =1.45 cfs 0.065 of Pond 113: Infiltration Basin Peak EIev= 953.90' Storage= 18,713 cf Inflow =17.11 cfs 0.940 of 15.0" Round Culvert n =0.011 L =10.0' S= 0.1000'P Outflow =6.67 cfs 0.768 of Pond Sump: Sump Manhole Peak EIev= 953.96' Storage =1,875 cf Inflow =16.53 cfs 0.880 of Outflow= 15.67 cfs 0.875 of Total Runoff Area= 2.120 ac Runoff Volume= 0.945 of Average Runoff Depth= 5.35" 20.28% Pervious = 0.430 ac 79.72% Impervious = 1.690 ac Proposed Conditions October 6, 2016 Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall = 6.86" Prepared by Hakanson Anderson Printed 10/6/2016 HydroCAD010.00 -17 s/n 01341 02016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 1 2 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Parking Lot Runoff = 16.53 cfs @ 11.98 hrs, Volume= 0.880 af, Depth> 5.90" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall= 6.86" Area (ac) CN Descriotion 1.690 98 Paved parking, HSG B 0.100 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 1.790 96 Weighted Average 0.100 5.59% Pervious Area 1.690 94.41 % Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Basin DA Runoff = 1.45 cfs @ 11.99 hrs, Volume= 0.065 af, Depth> 2.36" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH =SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall= 6.86" Area (ac) CN Descriotion 0.330 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.330 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) ( ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Pond 1 B: Infiltration Basin Inflow Area = 2.120 ac, 79.72% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 5.32" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 17.11 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.940 of Outflow = 6.67 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.768 af, Atten= 61 %, Lag= 8.7 min Primary = 6.67 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.768 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 953.90'@ 12.15 hrs Surf.Area= 10,148 sf Storage= 18,713 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 113.3 min calculated for 0.768 of (82% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 61.8 min ( 803.1 - 741.4) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 950.00' 19,779 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 950.00 2,222 0 0 951.00 3,259 2,741 2,741 952.00 4,351 3,805 6,546 953.00 5,732 5,042 11,587 954.00 10,652 8,192 19,779 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 952.00' 15.0" Round Culvert L= 10.0' RCP, end - section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 952.00'/ 951.00' S=0.10007' Cc= 0.900 n=0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 1.23 sf Primary OutFlow Max--6.66 cfs @ 12.15 hrs HW= 953.90' (Free Discharge) t1= Culvert (Inlet Controls 6.66 cfs @ 5.43 fps) Summary for Pond Sump: Sump Manhole Inflow Area = 1.790 ac, 94.41% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 5.90" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 16.53 cfs @ 11.98 hrs, Volume= 0.880 of Outflow = 15.67 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.875 af, Atten= 5 %, Lag= 1.5 min Primary = 15.67 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.875 of Routing by Stor -Ind method, Time Span= 5.00 -20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 953.96' @ 12.00 hrs Surf.Area= 3,415 sf Storage= 1,875 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 6.3 min calculated for 0.875 of (99% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 3.4 min ( 736.9 - 733.5 ) Proposed Conditions October 6, 2016 Type// 24 -hr 100- Year Rainfall= 6.86" Prepared by Hakanson Anderson Printed 10/6/2016 HYdroCAD®10.00 -17 s/n 01341 @2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 945.00' 2,018 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 945.00 28 0 0 953.00 28 224 224 954.00 3,560 1,794 2,018 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Device 2 953.00' NEENAH R- 1792 -JG Head (feet) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 Disch. (cfs) 0.000 1.000 2.800 5.200 8.000 11.100 #2 Primary 951.00' 8.0" Round Culvert L= 13.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 951.00'/950.80' S=0.0154/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.35 sf #3 Primary 953.20' 6.0' long x 0.5' breadth Broad - Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max =15.60 cfs @ 12.00 hrs HW= 953.96' (Free Discharge) �2= Culvert (Inlet Controls 2.72 cfs @ 7.80 fps) t1= NEENAH R- 1792 -JG (Passes 2.72 cfs of 11.10 cfs potential flow) 3= Broad- Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 12.87 cfs @ 2.83 fps) R ■ s Z 9' C 0 v M T.O. OPNG ELELEV: 114' -0" F.F.E. ELEV: 100' -0" T T 20 I PARTIAL NORTH ELEVATION 1/8" = V -0" fiE) CG_I ni Darwin Lindahl Architects, P.A. 4124 Quebec Ave. North, Suite 106 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55427 Ph:763.560.0448 Fax:763.560.0441 e -mail: lindahlarch@gmail.com THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS THE PROPERTY OF DARWIN LINDAHL ARCHITECTS, P.A. ITS USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DARWIN LINDAHL ARCHITECTS, P.A. IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF DARWIN LINDAHL ARCHITECTS, P.A. REPRODUCTION OF THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DARWIN LINDAHL ARCHITECTS, P.A. VIOLATES THE COPYWRITE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO LEGAL PROSECUTION. COPYRIGHT © 2015 BY DARWIN LINDAHL ARCHITECTS, P.A. Project # : 2016 -09 / U) Q I V//////Z f � W 0 O 3: co °Z �- Q UJI J O z Z CC \ U G ti L Q W (: MEN W Z co -J U) a. UJ J W 1 1 1 1 O T U p U �- � � V �o ,� 9 PARTIAL WEST ELEVATION co 1/8" = 1'-0" ,� 8 PARTIAL EAST ELEVATION 1/8" = 1' -0" 20' -1" 11' -9%" V 8' -5" 1' -3 2" 4%" 3' -10" 3-10" 2' -7 z" Lo, Lo 4' -5" SEE SCHED 4j2 4y" 5' -7%" 5' -0%" 4Y" 4�" 3' -5" 3' -11" 4y2" 4y2" /„ 4/2, N 4%2" 4%" 4%" 4%" 2.. 4%" cN 4%2" (N N GLAZING KEY: SYMBOL GLASS TYPE °w • 1/4" TEMPERED GLASS CV CV r• N f` t` c0 W W 04 • • • CN • • CN F2 CLEAR FINISH ALUMINUM ,� 7 I INTERIOR FRAME ELEVATIONS AT SALES MANAGERS #101 1/4" = 1' -0" F3 CLEAR FINISH ALUMINUM F4 CLEAR FINISH ALUMINUM F5 CLEAR FINISH ALUMINUM KEYNOTES: 1. SAWCUT OPENING W/ TOOTHED -IN CMU INFILL, CORES TO BE FILLED SOLID 2. SECTIONAL OVERHEAD ALUMINUM GARAGE DOOR 3. PREFINISHED BREAK METAL FLASHING COLUMN Revisions: No: Re vision: Date: Certification: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 7� Darwin M. Lindahl ' Date: SIG. DATE License No: 15248 Drawing: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Sheet No: A201 THE SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 3736 WALNUTS T HARRISBURG PA 17109 2528 ANDERSON PRO PAINTING 502 SAINT JOHNS DR SHIREMANSTOWN PA 17011 (717) 860 -4977 SALE UMBER SIZE PRODUCT 6 04 -13779 5 GAL A89WI151 Visit www.sherwin - williams.com Store 3323 (717) 545 -4239 JOB 01 ANDERSON PRO PAINTING SHIPPED TO: PA DOUG ANDERSON (717) 860 -4977 SI SHERWIN- WILLIAMS. CHARGE INVOICE NO. 2564 -4 PAGE 1 OF 1 PO# CAMPING WORLD ORDER: OE0063176Q3323 DATE: 1012812014 TIME: 07:30 AM 2 -5524 E55115553 TERMS: NET PAYMENT DUE ON NOV. 20TH DESCRIPTION SPR EXT SA EXTRA COLOR: C011 8182W CANDLEBARK CCE COLOR CAST OZ 32 64 128 61 BLACK -- - -- - --48 1 - 1 R2 MAROON - 3 1 1 Y3 DEEP GOLD 4 - 1 1 CUSTOM SHER- COLOR MATCH _ Thank You _ receipt required for refund MERCHANDISE RECEIVED IN GOOD ORDER BY. MARK QTY 10 #&No& =41 SUBTOTAL 6.000% SALES TAX:1- 391710900 CHARGE -'AiQ_ Lo CD CANDLEBARK MAIN BODY COLOR CO 11 8182W " CANDLEBARK" PAINT EX. CAP AREA OF DOOR FLASHING "BLUE OPENING CHIP (TYP)" MODIFICATIONS BLUE CHIP SW6959 � S COLUMNS "BLUE CHIP" (TYP) EI EAST BUILDING ELEVATION SCALE 3/32° = V -0" BLAND WALL "BLUE CHIP" o I j i s- I I H.M. DOOR /FRAME y "BLUE CHIP" (TYP) NORTH BUILDING ELEVATION uSCALE 3/32" � m I I I I 1 m F, J WEST BUILDING ELEVATION SCALE 3/32° = 1' -0' I i MIMI [�SOUTH 9' BUILDING ELEVATION SCALE 3/32° _ 1' -0" Q� 7i oN DW no I to mm O N N� EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE CAMPING WORLD SITE LIG HTI N G LENS? MANUFACTURER& REMARKS TYPE TYPE 16.0 I- I- 4,3 '11 D DFFUISER CATALOG N UI BER b.o b.o A SITE POLE 1oo0W D.1 b.3 LUMWRK LANDAU MONTICELLO, MN 1.+ 4.a t.s UIGHTNG 27-M POLE METAL HALVE h3, MILDFT1000 b., 13 b., b.o b.o STANDARD FEARS 70 FOUNDATION b.0 b.0 b.o b.o D.o O.o b.o b,o b.o b.0 b.o b.o b.0 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.0 b.o b.o 0.3 b.1 b.1 b.z 0.3 0.3 b., b.+ b.+ b.2 b.2 e.1 b.3 b.1 b.b b.o M t.o b.o b.o b.o o b.o b10 b.o b.o b.o b.0 b.o D.o b.b HEADS) I7.o 1., b3 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b,o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.a b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b., b.5 b.1 b3 b.s b.s .s i., .z 5.1 t,o b.1 b.3 b.2 b.1 b.1 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o I b.o b.o b.a a b.o b,o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.0 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 b.3 1.2 h., 5 3.1 LS b.s o.'A , b3 b.1 b.1 b.1 b.o b.o b.o b.0 b.o b.1 b.1 b.1 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b b.o9. � PHOTOMETRIC PLAN b.o b,o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.0 b.0 b.D b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.1 b.1 b.1 b3 1.2 ',.1E 1z3 , b. 4.1 13 b.o b3 b.1 b.1 b.s b.o b.o b.1 b.1 b.3 b.1 b.1 b.o E1.1 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN t.0 b.o b.o b.o b.a b.o bq b.o b.a b,o b.o b.D b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.D b,o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.a b.1 b.1 b.1 b.3 b.s 4.6 11.e y.+ 1.7 b.3 5s. y.e 5.6 1.4 b.6 b., b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 b3 b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 b.o b. b.o b.D b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.D A b.o b.o b.o b.o b.0 b.o b.o D.0 b.0 b.D b.o b.o b.o b.o t.o b.1 b.1 b.1 b.3 1.3 3.z a 17. .o t3 t.3 1. s 11.+ hzs 7 +., bsA s h.s 1.6 }.o b., b.1 b.1 b.1 b.3 b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 b.o b.0 b.o b.o b.0 b.o b.o b.0 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.0 b.o b.o b.o b.a b.1 b.1 b.1 b3 1.1 + 1 E t., S.s 4.0 .s }1.z 4,.z 33.s t1s 52.e [X •,.s 13 b.1 b.+ b.z b.2 b.z b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 b3 b.1 b.1 b.1 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.0 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.D b.0 b.o b.o b.1 b.1 b.1 b,3 b.s h., 1N t5.+ 4.1 .9 5.3 %.1 53 5.0 3.e t.1 b3 b.s 12.s 51.1 15.1 hz.e 39.2 Ss. b.s 4.s h.o 1.3 b.6 D3 b.2 b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 b.o b.o b.o b.0 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.1 b.1 b.1 b.3 1.3 5.4 Ss. z 51,a .1 y.s to h.7 1.4 1.1 5.6 h.s ,3 b.s b.+ §3 §.a U.1 11.6 '',o., IS .7 k.z 1.5 1.6 1.1 b.7 b3 b3 b.2 b., b.1 b.1 b.1 b.o b.o b.o b.0 b.o b.o b.o b.0 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.1 b.1 b.1 b3 is E iz. .1 �1 t.s 4 s b.6 b.1 b.s 1.1 1.e 5.1 +.1 t.z 51.5 133 12.7 h,.z kl.s k.z b.s t3 h3 1.5 b.e b.+ b.z b.z b3 b.1 b.1 b.o b.o b., b,a E% b.o b.o b.o b.o b,o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.1 b.1 b.1 b., l.o h.e .+ S.o t,a 5.1 } s 1" b.7 l.z h.o 4.s 4.1 1.7 53.6 11.7 333 4e3 56s U. b.o h.s }.s 1.1 b.s b.z b.z 1.1 b.1 b.1 b.o b,o A b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 b3 1.3 3.s 3s.0 57.z z.o S.s :.7 4.s 1. b., b. b 1.6 5.7 6.1 S. 11.1 53,0 11.1 h5.9 t3.0 b.0 52.7 1 E�fO 1.e t.9 b.7 b3 b.z b.1 b.1 b.o E b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 ba l.z bo. h +.e lz.s ,1 §.6 5.0 5., i.s b. b., b. b l.e t.o IS 10.1 15.0 11.0 h0.s k3a ,3.7 1oA 51.1 5.0 5.6 b.s b.3 b.1 b.1 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.a b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 b3 b3 h.+ 51. Ss. 1.3 b,s t.s 3.3 1.0 1.+ b b., b., b. 1.+ 3.6 1- 3 i1.4 103 1- 11.1 70., b.1 ., Ss. X s 4.6 b,e b.3 b.1 A b.o b.o b.D b.o b.1 b.1 b.1 b.z b.z, b.3 1.2 5.7 .s 1 - 1o.0 43 y,z I., 3.o LS t.e b.s b., b. b.7 13 b.s A03 11.6 t., 113 tae z. e.z ', .T fi.z t +.1 b.s b.z E% b,o b.o b.o b.o b.1 b.1 b.z ba b.+ 1.0 6 i9.6 s., b.s t.6 b.e §. h.0 }3 1.1 1.o b.s b.7 b3 5.7 t3 b.3 11.6 1 3+ 46. 1.3 b.+ b,o b.o b.o b.1 t.1 b.z ba b.s b.1 1.7 t1.6 t7.s 1,.1 0.1 5sO 53 t.s }s.o 51 s 4.1 3.0 4,s h.z 1., b.s b.0 b.i b.s V? 5., 6.1 b.z b.e la. 16.0 lsa h .9 1.s b.s b.o b.o b.o b.1 b.2 b3 b.s b.s 1.6 ls. he. 1,.7 1.6 ba b.z ,., t.s }0. 1.1 5. 5., i.s is b.s b.s }., b.s 1.0 1.e 53 13 11.e }s., 46., &K 5.9 b., b,0 b.0 b.o b.1 b.2 b.s 1.1 1.6 5. .1 t.D to S.e 5.1 t.z }7. 5. t., 4.s i., 1.1 13 hs ,3 113Ae b.1n b. b3 b.s l.s +.0 b.e 1- sn.e b1,3 a 4.1 D.+ b.a b.0 b.a b.1 b.2 b3 3.z t.z .s 3., b.s ,.1 5,1 4.1 3.s b S.o 1.2 i +. 4., h3 h.+ 5.1 5., ls. b.1 b 1 D.z b.s 1.0 3.0 5.1 10a 1- u, 1.7 b., b.o b.D b.a b3 b.z b.7 57 ls . '. . . . 1.1 b.s b.6 b.9 t.s 4.+ }s.z 3.2 1.1 L+ b., b.o b.0 b.2 b.s t1. b1., e.+ i1.z b.2 1.0 b.2 10, b.3 t.e ,.s 3.e 3a 53 to 1 , Se.s I6. y,a 19.a s. ls.a t3 1.0 5.a 1.z 5.2 5.3 11.3 hz.s k.1 la b., b.0 b.D b.o b.o b.1 b.s 1.2 1 5s.+ 1- S.e la., U., Se. Ss h.7 4.1 h., 5a t .o b.1 b.+ t, b 3s.s b.s h,, D.z 1.1 1.1 1.3 5.2 3.6 1- hs,2 b1.6 1 1,6 b3 / C b.o. b.o b.o b.o b., b.z l.o S.s 1 h3., §.s t,3 12.1 5.9 3.1 h3 3.s ,3 t.o t.o t. 9" ;,1 �� he3 b3 }. la.1 41,1 11. 2 1.5 b.3 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.1 b.1 b3 1.0 h.1 3.6 t.0 t.1 13.3 5 S 3 t.1 3.e 3.s +.7 a+ 1o.a +.s 33 S.1 t3 5.s 7. 1.6 b.s b.2 t.+ b.2 11.+ 51.1 0.1 l,z b3 b.o b.a b.a b.0 b.1 b.1 b.z b3 b.e .a 5.s 11.3 11.0 1., 5.1 t. 1a.+ t.s +.s 5.1 h3 4.2 5.5 13 h.+ 1 53 Sa 6 1.3 1, L.z }z.> 63.5 ls.s 1.6 b3 b.o b.o b.o b.0 b.o b.1 b.1 b.z b., l.o iss ls.s }13 ] .1 1 b.3 5,6 4. 13 1 .0 53 5.9 5.6 1.3 1.e 13 ,.6 3a .e I.e 5 5 46.+ b2A 1.e 13 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.1 b.1 b.1 b.z b.7 ,.+ e.s 15.1 133 10.1 B t3 1 .s h3 4.0 4.6 4.s h.1 5.s 13.+ A 11.1 3., 3.1 5.6 5za 1- }s.s 1.6 b.3 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.1 b.1 b.z b.1 5., A 'n3 4z.z 1,.1 lo.s 5.0 ,.6 § 3 ks.+ H. 3.6 S.z 53 t3 5.s .1 ,., t.o t. go 4.1 }6.1 Sz.e 1- 1.2 b.2 1 b.o b.a b.o b.o b.o b.D b.1 b.1 b., 13 13s 11., b.s t.s t3 t. 51.s S7. } s t. t 11., 1.6 3.1 10.2 S.z '1 t 113 11.1 13.+ 4 +.1 tz.1 }s.o 1., b.3 b.a b.o b.o b.o M b.o b.D b.1 b.1 b.2 1.1 3. 41.z ls. 11.1 13 b.e b.z §.1 Ls io. B t. i.s �A 5s.+ 4.s y.3 §.a 5.3 0 :?, 4.2 h.7 53 t. t, a+ 1s.1 51.1 D1A 1.3 b.z b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b. b.o b.1 b.1 b., 1., 33.6 w . U.1 }1,+ fo.s t.z t.z t 4,s t, i . s hs,s t.9 t., 5.z ,.7 4.2 1.1 D., b.s }.e 1.+ 1.3 1.6 U3 4s.s to., 19.1 1., b3 b.o b.o b.o M b.o b.o b.o b.o b.1 b,z b.6 1.9 1 o 'i3.o Is. 3 1- lo.1 b.o t.1 S.9 S.s s 1+.1 1,1 1 b 5.z b.+ 1.2 b.6 b.5 1.1 }.1 b.e b.9 b3 l.2 1.1 ,.6 5.9 4.a io 1- Sz.o 1o.0 1.1 b.z b.o b.o b.o b.o b. b.o b.o b.o b.o b.1 b.2 b.7 h.1 3.6 o t5.o bs. 4.e s 11.4 51.1 b.e t.s }.s 4.1 , 11.1 13.1 , 46.0 43 b.9 b.6 b.s b.1 b.1 b.s 1.a 1.7 h.1 3.1 13 b,s `v.1 'w+ 13.0 1,3 b3 1 g b.o b.a b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.D b.1 b.1 b.s 1.3 l.e ,3 t 3 h A 16. 12.1 1.1 4.1 4.e t.1 13.9 51.+ 11.1 4s., b.3 4. b.7 b.s b.s b.1 b.s b b.e f.o 1.e 1.2 b.s 1- 51.+ §0 1.6 b.2 X2 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b. b.o b.o b.0 b.D b,o b.1 b.1 b.1 b.s 1.3 h.e t.s s 5s.s 1 , 13.1 12.4 113 15.1 3s.a D b1.+ l +a 46.1 t.a h, b.s 5.1 1.1 1.0 b.e b. }3 1,6 b.0 12.6 hs.1 1- 1 l.s b3 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o 1.o b.o b.o b.o b.1 b.1 b.z b.7 1.+ 4.s lo. 1 0 4o.2 113 12.1 hz.s 16.z L.+ y,s §. 2 5.z 1.6 4.e 5.3 3., h.o i.s 73 b. b 5.6 t.1 z 16.1 b3 1.1 b.z b.o t.o b.a b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.D 5.0 b.o b.o b.1 b.1 b.1 b.z b3 b.s 1.1 5.6 5., t,' h3. lz 5,., ls.s 5.6 ,3 t t., 11.6 11.1 t.s S.o 4.1 1.1 b.s i. 2 41.z '0 1 1.z b3 b.o t.o b.a b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b,o b.o b.o b.o b3 b.1 b.1 b.1 b. b3 b.e I. , 1 Ssa 43. 1, s D S.s Ss I3 ,.e 4.1 h. t,s hs.z 71.e *x., Sz.1 t.2 S.1 1.+ b.s 1.5 5.e § 7 313 k:. 6 1.6 b3 b.o b.a b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.1 b.1 b.1 b,1 b., i.1 4.1 +.o §. 4s.1 4.s h.o h.s ,.z 53 ,.1 y.s 71. 3 13.+ t,. 7.s 1.1 1.1 }3 , t., 13.z So3 y13 + 5.6 b.3 b.o t.a b.o M b.o b.o b.o t.o b.0 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b. b.1 b.1 b.1 b3 b.1 b.1 4.0 ,.6 t3 D },o h.a t., b3 t.1 53 t.2 t.9 5,. 5.1 h.D 1.8 5.0 t.2 b3 12.2 h1.0 }2.1 3 1.2 b3 b.0 t.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.0 b,o b.o b.o b.o t.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.0 b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 b3 5.z +.1 t 1.6 5. la.s 1,. 7 to.0 b,, t.1 t.s 5 5.5 1.1 h. 1.1 5.s 11.1 1e.o 56.6 h3.z Ss.1 1 t3 1.3 b.0 t.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o t.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o t.0 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.a b.o b.o b.1 b.1 b.z b.1 13 4.2 1.1 ta,e t1. L.+ b.3 t3 t.o 3.6 },o h. 33 184Ts .e 41.1 36.6 �, s 1.1 b3 D.0 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b,0 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.0 b.o b.o b.o b.0 5.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.z b.s D.7 b.s .2 _b., b., 1.1 5,s 101 3 1z3 10.3 4.z 5.1 1.6 3. 41.s 52.1 Ss.s D1.+ s 1.1 b.3 EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE LETTER FD(TURE MDUNTING LAMP LENS? MANUFACTURER& REMARKS TYPE TYPE 16.0 I- I- 4,3 '11 D DFFUISER CATALOG N UI BER b.o b.o A SITE POLE 1oo0W D.1 b.3 LUMWRK LANDAU REUSE EASTING LIGHT FWURE 1.+ 4.a t.s UIGHTNG 27-M POLE METAL HALVE h3, MILDFT1000 b., 13 b., b.o b.o STANDARD FEARS 70 FOUNDATION b.o b.o D.D b.1 a SIZE POLE 1oo0W LUMNWL LANDAU REUSE EASTNG L1G11T FWURE S1.0 19.5 U3 y53 LIGHTING -V POLE METAL HALIDE b.o b,o b.o b.o b.o b,o MPI.DF71000181) b.o b,o STANDARD 7L` FOUNDATION b3 b.1 b.s Ls 4.3 3a HEADS) I7.o 1., b3 D.o b.o b.o D.o 5,0 b.o b.o b.o b,0 b.o b.o D.o C SITE POLE 1oo0At - LUM0IRL LANDAU REUSE EASTNG LK*H[ FKnJRE 1.3 h., ,.e UKc4ING 224' POLE METAL HALVE b.0 D.D b.o b,0 b.o D.o MLLDFT1000 b.o b.o STANDARD HEADS) 7-0" FOIM.NTKIN b.o b.1 b.1 t.1 b.1 b.z b3 h.1 AC FLOOD WHT SURFACE 4WW fi. fi. LUMLARL LANDAU REUSE EASTNG LIGHT FWU E hn h� fi. fi� METAL HALVE h, fi: MlHPAD0Mi V� 4� 5. fie fi� fiA WIC FLOOD LIGHT SURFACE 1501N LANDAU REUSE EXISTING LIGHT FIXRIRE METAL HALIDE �LUMARK M HR15OMH D.1 b3 b.+ ba b3 b. b.z b,+ 1.3 ,.o 12. 3 363 1e. lss 1z.9 §.9 t.s t.s t.+ } l+a S1. 5,.1 b.s h5.s 'u 1- 1.1 b3 A b.o b.1 b.z D.z b.2 b3 b.1 b.s 1.s ,.0 5 tz.+ ts. 13 1z3 lo.e 4.7 b3 t.s b.o 1s3 15.2 h1.2 563 11.0 13 b.3 b.o b., b.1 D.1 b.1 b3 b.1 b.1 b.1 b l.1 h3 ,a §1 + 11.1 12.6 113 10.4 §.2 D.z U.7 11.9 hs.e 5,.e h0.1 1.7 b3 b.o b.o b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 b.o b.0 b.0 b.1 b.1 b3 D 1.a 4.a t3 yo.5 Sz. 19 5 7 12.2 1z.B EX14.6 16.0 Sz.s teA 1 1.e Da A D.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.a 1,1 1,1 b.o D.o b3 b.1 D.1 b. 13 h.o +.e 51.1 5,, is 5 ., s 16.0 I- I- 4,3 '11 D 11.1 1.s b., b.a b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.a D, b.o b.1 D.1 b.3 b.1 b 1.+ 4.a t.s z Se,o h3, 1a.1 lsa 40.0 53.0 b., 13 b., b.o b.o b.o b.o b.0 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.0 b.o b.o D.D b.1 b.1 b.1 b.1 b. 1.2 h.6 t3 47.o %. S1.0 19.5 U3 y53 12.4 1.5 b3 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b,o b.o b.o b.o b,o b.o b.o b.o b,o b.o b.0 b.1 b3 b.1 b.s Ls 4.3 3a + 1s.z Ss.s 1� I7.o 1., b3 D.o b.o b.o D.o 5,0 b.o b.o b.o b,0 b.o b.o D.o b.o b.o D.o b.o b.0 b.o b.1 b.1 b.1 b.a 1.3 h., ,.e 5. ka. .2 50.0 1.1 b.z bu b.o b.o D.0 b.0 D.D b.o b,0 b.o D.o b.0 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b, b.o b.o b.1 b.1 t.1 b.1 b.z b3 h.1 1+.1 53 b.s b.1 hn fin fi� h� h� hn fin fi� hn fin fi. fi. fin hn hn h� fi. fi� fin fi� � fi h, fi: fi h. V. V� 4� 5. fie fi� fiA N � PHOTOMETRIC PLAN KEYED NOTES; ELECTRICAL SHEET INDEX D.t Sm. 1- -W -o' 0 AM CUSTOM CUT OFF SHOW' E1.1 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN I<IA=IM2 A ® Copyright 2016 mm E-W) c/4 AV. ROChesler, MN 507- 121 -6610 S6 Poul: MN 651- 633 -1223 wmr.lkpb.can CAMPING WORLD SITE LIGHTING 3te1 CHO= I" a MMfnM A W I HERESY CERnFY TINT THIS PUN, BPEGFMATION - ME T WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY "MOT SUM"". AND THAT 1 AN A WLY LICENSED PROFEsst N ENGINEER UDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MNNESOTA DATE: 1013/16 REG. NO.: 23791 RENEW DATE: 06/20/16 AILEN V. T S51 DRAWING HISTORY: I I ISSUE FOR PERMIT 1 10/13/16 1 �^arty S1fIGTf� � 23MI Q TAMIL LEN EN• J/ S' fJOTA. 0' This dacund i may be m eiwt a fle ar may be PM.d ham eR ekct w - PIOYNed to ft user. h I. tle sole respa,sbiw d the user to ensue OW the corAeill I qudity k caekl -i with the carealt erd gmlty of the paper daaaneres an fik al LKPS This Sheol may be a Reduced copy. The bar ab- Is 1' kxg one Full Sbe Shw. Drewkp Scab apply to Full SMe 3hee! . scale: AS NOTED drawn M: TVB decked by: AVT dale: 10/13/16 prooM caraeq: DONOVAN GESKE (dom'an.geskeplkpb.can) 1-1- ro: 2016.133.00 sheet title PHOTOMETRIC PLAN sheet number E1.1 .911 7� 'b '.1 1 B, 5z] 1 •ai U! 5JA N,a iiJ ,f.l t11 ttA J1.1 /iJA��, �',✓ • f3 c / • aA », hs .u." • , i A i,A lu 'ua a u s 3as iz, is. u U lu Nu '6a u lu w n, to - Sea n, 3zr i4J I>sy iSJ /» u ia. >z a.l , iu na 5u u u tae u.l 'lu 5u u, u uA 1u /'hJ L •Jq^ fu ie., 'ar ., m , eu n, ,., 3ss u., lu U »s XI iu /• a to nA ice a i 1 4u wP i� yr }u' NJ nJ a .'C hl tzs i9 . c , 11, 1u N C a eA aA - } a1 s, 5A 11.1 X, s ul n,i 9 'aD u ba i 5u ., is ,u a. 1u uJ )u 1. } Ss u is N9 a] 4ea hl Sa > 1u A-1. u! + AN n as e a u fW isJ TEE �y�� 5, s 5a u, U, u, X91 '41 i, a sx v s ss i.r J., v }s »J LA ' , 51.1 o m >,1 U., »a iu w %s 0 a1 al al u 5a , u u }s 1 u v v v it -ii -i- i.� Lr u u Le 5A z, au E3 /J1 lo.r uA N i u N, ,.r 5.a e $ if,e is B19s s as iu 1u iaf pLq�t���Q� url�„ uA if. vD a far iu V'r ' • 11A 10 }, "'I q� 1 A b1 13 •„ ee: N4 »J e, »! v.1 "�C1 o O o i9 \� s9 i' • »A is, n.: s..] V I n, s1J s CO� fJ a u.l 41 iaf N., Sat %J iz, 1u b, 'NS uJ .1 ' iu Sea a� soa mA 'Na�ixa ua as r yAa 5, ^ aA it xl 5u iA b9 s lif i1D •19 u.9 }sa iu f O- 1.7 N., w 5z1 51.e nr iu na i }sa 3,. u, »Aia4 lu >a C� 5. » } A i J 5 NJ X. X] ILA 1lr »A »! U, t„ OS itt nJ •na , If, .1 }i,i » W W iAl I. n. W 1 •Xf SA.f B B B B B 3u », • s iu B 3u %A 5 e e }aa sa i »s a1 5m t h1 Mls Su friJ A n.r », d '.A »9 ia4 A 5. 31 »! xe r }1 »a .1 b., »s 1 ..._ 66 - -- »! as nJ Ill »., nP ia1 ,J '171 }IA , •la }4 il0 »J »A r k.9 iu ».1 »A 9 ».r 10 A ».1 z1 51 »! 3a9 }v 3zl »s »s n. ».r B B B Ja B B e e e e m 141 », iu ' s 41 ioa %J ht ».1 41 J iv r iM bs , fnJ 5aa iu iu ».1 3u », %, isJ NJ ns N Ta r N 1w »A 7 iu 51.1 POLE MOUNTED DOIN101TT }� �a 11 I� li This point -by -point calculation was created using the latest photometric Information and IES files from the manufacturers, however certain assumptions have to be made about the as -built site and building conditions. This photometric study only takes into account the scheduled luminaires, and does not reflect the lighting contributions j from other sources such as adjacent Property fixtures, or municipal roadway - lighting. These other sources can have a significant effect on the proposed lighting design. i Stdistical Am &.-wy "ect modiftm Do* LRbd C kType Unit Avg Ma Mm Avg/Mm M-/Mm m gJBde aeeNWlm mmbn F6 18.84 104 0.1 60.5 4:1 IB popaty--.L- IS-i-mce Fa 3.68 3,56 0.1 4.5 3:1 LunbWn Schedule ha sr" Qty I Label Am 9=0t LnmeBl LIF Maoll6opBV /Mode 36 A GROUP NA 0.857 2 L®vt Loden NIII,DMOOD B e 17 B GROUP N.A. 0.857 2 L=AM& Lmdm M M171000180 B mB 6 C GROUP NA 0.857 4LfmwkL -dwA RDFT1000 -0 4 CONTRACTOR AC SINGLE 32000 0.857 L®ck Hl®et MMWOOIffi -0 5 MAC SDIGLE 16MO 0,857 T n k Hnnmer NA®t1301.0 W »l 40.e M9 N.J »9 nJ »A }al A ia4 UP ea A bA a] a NA 10.9 N, n, iae %s V, J , k A n 9 5 �1 I,, b, 1i 54 , X »l n] R , iu J t, � e¢ FIXIIE SQfW MR POLE NDW70 A 1 I, a »e 5J Sa] is POLE YOINim POLE YULMim SMaF Nf1URE DOUBLE FA(RIC 5, iJ fiR e. J u u f , .A 1, u tJ '6 L i j u 9a al ar e,/ u u hl al G F E D C B t J MONTICELLO DODGE /'• WEST CHELSEA ROAD MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA Q S We UN PULSE Olson & Sons Eleclric � ~ (952)277 -0400 Paul Twite IES poulApulseproducts.com ha 51 v 1 u eb W »l 40.e M9 N.J »9 nJ »A }al A ia4 UP ea A bA a] a NA 10.9 N, n, iae %s V, J , k A n 9 5 �1 I,, b, 1i 54 , X »l n] R , iu J t, � e¢ FIXIIE SQfW MR POLE NDW70 A 1 I, a »e 5J Sa] is POLE YOINim POLE YULMim SMaF Nf1URE DOUBLE FA(RIC 5, iJ fiR e. J u u f , .A 1, u tJ '6 L i j u 9a al ar e,/ u u hl al G F E D C B t J MONTICELLO DODGE /'• WEST CHELSEA ROAD MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA Q S We UN PULSE Olson & Sons Eleclric � ~ (952)277 -0400 Paul Twite IES poulApulseproducts.com ha u � h, h4 ��TUR BY ELEiLCONRACTO J hb 5s A.4 u i SOUARE STEEL POLE By ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR 1 hJ i I 3'I1' HAMDHOLE CORN STEEL. COYER /^GROUT PACKED AROUND AND UNDER flASE AND ANCHOR BOLTS BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR 24' DIAMETER FORMED CONCRETE DGE ESRC OE W ELCTIL CONTRACTOR } u u ._ 2'-0". IN PAYED AREA I I 7 "x36' ,vNCrfoR 130LT 1 a4 ` .. FlMSH DINE SURFACE a4 3,000 PSI MR ENTRAINED CONCRETE . P.ENTRAINED 2 Br ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR 5, a4 I e - =TNING PROTECTION GROUND R00 PER NEC 1996 0 REBAR 4D ELECTRIC 13 REBAR CIRCULAR TIES u '. I e 'ur ' CONTRACTOR III IIII - IIII ' _ =IIII _ L I 1 W »l 40.e M9 N.J »9 nJ »A }al A ia4 UP ea A bA a] a NA 10.9 N, n, iae %s V, J , k A n 9 5 �1 I,, b, 1i 54 , X »l n] R , iu J t, � e¢ FIXIIE SQfW MR POLE NDW70 A 1 I, a »e 5J Sa] is POLE YOINim POLE YULMim SMaF Nf1URE DOUBLE FA(RIC 5, iJ fiR e. J u u f , .A 1, u tJ '6 L i j u 9a al ar e,/ u u hl al G F E D C B t J MONTICELLO DODGE /'• WEST CHELSEA ROAD MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA Q S We UN PULSE Olson & Sons Eleclric � ~ (952)277 -0400 Paul Twite IES poulApulseproducts.com SEOTION 10. T121N. MW o1Lxrc tm. a, H 1F. 0 CIrF< sE' R'Q•� VICINITY MAP (NO SCALE) ZONING REQUIREMENTS M 6 / I[am Y/ - YCPONM wsrass pSWCT 7aaa yI - eI a e11sf.E55 NSnaai / s ` yn'a y'1:y `C )y`'�t, :; j: Y: '9w ' ••+•r; • {',� •� •�' ` :_ "L +ti'� w :. :�'": • a;,. p ; Yon' a Y as— 185 - IHEWT Male aux yr PSllaai ns - AY eau• / L {.. t , k• },ti ' % •'•i.'!.•,i a • •d as amR sat armor i); ,t, v+:f,: r'r': %'n';.t{ ,- �' �'rtir:: '• •::j:% 10,0.E s8 A mT& It A [agTR1AL vw VOIILIE SN[5 w IWTM a A CONOmWN. I.wE /: ti. r "i•H "ry ' r� t', J'•� i:; l "''1' +L i'�•.; ' r••{ •_ •: } :'R / i ^•' } 1+' nr ": Ti >i ,.'i.:rr••:':' :I:a't�;;,Z',. •d,y •`, _ ••(�, ✓.',,' LLNNVI LR AIEA - NONE VNa4V tar MeA - NOTE �,L•., ":;;:j ti;: ,�'':. �n•:j ('r _�, sy +. �S.t:; ". ,,r+; t�:: +fKY:'•T••,r�v: YNYIWLafwOw -NANO MNuu :w,ow -IOU I¢T /" - �':,<,� '�L;"•, +:y:: 67:,1 -''f': t<1 '•.i' .; h1:i 3�` / vS� +,:i ",. `5•y, i<�4" 'i :. KJ: •'tF. .eat YAwRAIY 1£lalf - 2 51awE3 / 70 fFLT MAPMt N[laR - I SIaaE3 / b REF - :%,.`iY'L '' �•� _ ..;E;,, ,., :"� rl�,'� a -•-,� �fi,,� ):,,.:•41i r1� �.� BtaDm ZRApts / Y+rl "J, ., I•�:,:4J ? "1'; .,Jt „t;`� r, :.i. , }; /• flla Pr010 slleAatY / • {. .:.: i.•`•;;,,e�2i:iu :N, i.:.. ..`, :: °''r' "+'`�' z�:'' '::'t,_'e° + T,.�., > li -affET {ea1T -Oa iF[T J. / ".•.� 'dt�y t:1'i�•r'Lyt.I,t u {. +• •�:Y'ij -: t'-- 3'::.< °f !f±. STR[T 9aC -. RET SNATIDR -iO 101¢YCE Hlpeal �y{ -); ;:L• ,Ir:•; ;f ". l,Ri• "�. e,7Lwae SOE - o FRET SaE- T 4`"Y •.:>;''T '+4 . :fT: -v5'n 1a "j ��4 mAn -aiST TEAR -aa frET / :� +j'�•• •'��!Ya+„ c•f'` ins i:• !4`�, PAxala s[Bw PAaaN sTo MY * '�%ypja�gu�eNt.`ta'i' .ate,+• j• •; 4 Gti.iii}j pL�' .4� ::;'r f iQTN AM tai lxE II¢T ie MY LOAM / a / ,1 `" �. ••<•'rarnrw�.'I',•,��l i:, .`;(r •�fiOYf " ✓•,+ "•'M• PANfNa IEaAPaElaw P/Aale IEaANUtaiw .... _ .+. S• . . lAa5 /WS aE MoAONAL wa S EPP R99 off b0111 &SPAR Vim- —• �^- —• � -_ � _� � _VB,• fR [ARM 00a 50. Fs P RDaI AREA FOR FA, saa sa.'i lF Rose AvA , , �. . . .. . . r, NIF n. (vL1eaE San Aga mliW n ( a,ln m� / 5 e9307'2iT'E�47 6, 7 — — /— • , (AT Pa on ! YRetOLo ZOMa CwE) IRS t[R all' or Ya4Aalt0 I.N. Oa.3 �\ �C aIAP,A4 A VaRr EARYOII kaml ttE ai LOi I' —• Pw� / (AM SmLLf 310 AOa1KN) W SiR[trIS morscH I I Im e10Y f ewml�, rµ�A N�as'rRa \ / r Y � All, ao wvk smAd .-..• — ' .- .- . — —T I MaX1KaLa enwNTY R."riLOaMa \ Ws . ' \• / •f' tM 6 vACA4A l\ t /� wcof06 Tas-EN-m4) DAIfn \ / \ .Cinca OOUPi \\ CY ak OT la.M.sAm WT7 trwolue: rs LEOAILr aooastNe Joe Aw TIE P/Aal coA.sES al \ '�$'� 11 ` a otlRYals[ Dosr rMAxNwr'Sr,aE'� ,pAF ammuar+ rEaaaalrs Fw ns alne5�r wq,*°�' Crry ,' \Qi+ rlsr LM Ls Lm i,�a :: ,' -•`'. \ \ \ '" ��,�$ ����'�� g�a j ICI I wiener \ a, \ O i\ 5 001010 • I LEGEND Pw MI� YAYIw.[ \ ,' r:',1 'v..•.:. ...i�,.. \ -!i\ '�' � N. R l3 R1LK eASN \ ,• v * , \ Y� At 11E=TrE Lg1 PP Q m`sEW raE ':.L a • a ms sw1Er v+a I §I wv• rA+a1 vuac \ \ :•"�•,•• c •• \ \ I la al V D ilea PaE 1 t'' Im 1. taatK I sox e ,: I�r• t'i't % I SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE � a , VEHICLE SALES/SERVICE BlI2DIN0 7 IJ.S FEET TFfifiy [ xa [PJNS a ,¢T COMMITMENT N0, NCS- 806919D -PHXI ,.. ,,, gr•ti: a-'"�, :rt i mad. occardanw I ALTA/NSPS Land TIU. Surveys, Jointly estobl ed and dopted by AL7A ond NSPS, e, 9, 10(tl), 13, 14, - d hdudea It... 1, 2, 3, 4, 6(a), 6(b). 7( . 7(b)(1 ), 7(c), 10, 17, and 20 of Table A thawt Th. 8d4 work was complied on. 6YgI% Tract N \ j':'T!:`:;i ". '48;;.,:..� �• 4 �, �yyq 'kq. Gotr. // `` \ \p11111NNAi BASIS FOR BEARINGS SYSTEM "+� .Fr:I ,:{•r `, ..:.,r,.i: :::•, <•+i :,}.,i :;_. \ ? Y L4Wy[ta4 Y'-v Mark V. Y•r I Minnewta Re91sMOUon No, IE4 � a Y Won N . 1 WRIGHT COUNTY COORDINATE NAD63, 1956) miJ t.; i > { T' ;: ; ": - • : •I'.rs i • a :•• , : T„ a ,. -; •rTy;,y "i 1: •:' . \ , \ e� ' Va. 9 �,f8 atge }� .1 �NA PEAL ME CPS MEASUREMENTS UDUZINC MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NTS NETWORK) Tract 2: J Lot 1, 81-k 1, 90th Street 2nd Addition, —At that part platted Wright County, M�nasset- \ •SrJ' -":r: •.�laV'•- '<;•,- "r:•::.,r' >:` `•,•,•. 'l/ EA SLY SIDE OF 3601 CHELSEA ROAD WEST 1 !, '•, M V, at ar •FV;.;I, "•r , ^ + I Y ?_• ... J .. \ bp,, �i �eg�J QTY OF MONTICl.L0, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA I[am Y/ - YCPONM wsrass pSWCT 7aaa yI - eI a e11sf.E55 NSnaai / s ` yn'a y'1:y `C )y`'�t, :; j: Y: '9w ' ••+•r; • {',� •� •�' ` :_ "L +ti'� w :. :�'": • a;,. p ; Yon' a Y as— 185 - IHEWT Male aux yr PSllaai ns - AY eau• / L {.. t , k• },ti ' % •'•i.'!.•,i a • •d as amR sat armor i); ,t, v+:f,: r'r': %'n';.t{ ,- �' �'rtir:: '• •::j:% 10,0.E s8 A mT& It A [agTR1AL vw VOIILIE SN[5 w IWTM a A CONOmWN. I.wE /: ti. r "i•H "ry ' r� t', J'•� i:; l "''1' +L i'�•.; ' r••{ •_ •: } :'R / i ^•' } 1+' nr ": Ti >i ,.'i.:rr••:':' :I:a't�;;,Z',. •d,y •`, _ ••(�, ✓.',,' LLNNVI LR AIEA - NONE VNa4V tar MeA - NOTE �,L•., ":;;:j ti;: ,�'':. �n•:j ('r _�, sy +. �S.t:; ". ,,r+; t�:: +fKY:'•T••,r�v: YNYIWLafwOw -NANO MNuu :w,ow -IOU I¢T /" - �':,<,� '�L;"•, +:y:: 67:,1 -''f': t<1 '•.i' .; h1:i 3�` / vS� +,:i ",. `5•y, i<�4" 'i :. KJ: •'tF. .eat YAwRAIY 1£lalf - 2 51awE3 / 70 fFLT MAPMt N[laR - I SIaaE3 / b REF - :%,.`iY'L '' �•� _ ..;E;,, ,., :"� rl�,'� a -•-,� �fi,,� ):,,.:•41i r1� �.� BtaDm ZRApts / Y+rl "J, ., I•�:,:4J ? "1'; .,Jt „t;`� r, :.i. , }; /• flla Pr010 slleAatY / • {. .:.: i.•`•;;,,e�2i:iu :N, i.:.. ..`, :: °''r' "+'`�' z�:'' '::'t,_'e° + T,.�., > li -affET {ea1T -Oa iF[T J. / ".•.� 'dt�y t:1'i�•r'Lyt.I,t u {. +• •�:Y'ij -: t'-- 3'::.< °f !f±. STR[T 9aC -. RET SNATIDR -iO 101¢YCE Hlpeal �y{ -); ;:L• ,Ir:•; ;f ". l,Ri• "�. e,7Lwae SOE - o FRET SaE- T 4`"Y •.:>;''T '+4 . :fT: -v5'n 1a "j ��4 mAn -aiST TEAR -aa frET / :� +j'�•• •'��!Ya+„ c•f'` ins i:• !4`�, PAxala s[Bw PAaaN sTo MY * '�%ypja�gu�eNt.`ta'i' .ate,+• j• •; 4 Gti.iii}j pL�' .4� ::;'r f iQTN AM tai lxE II¢T ie MY LOAM / a / ,1 `" �. ••<•'rarnrw�.'I',•,��l i:, .`;(r •�fiOYf " ✓•,+ "•'M• PANfNa IEaAPaElaw P/Aale IEaANUtaiw .... _ .+. S• . . lAa5 /WS aE MoAONAL wa S EPP R99 off b0111 &SPAR Vim- —• �^- —• � -_ � _� � _VB,• fR [ARM 00a 50. Fs P RDaI AREA FOR FA, saa sa.'i lF Rose AvA , , �. . . .. . . r, NIF n. (vL1eaE San Aga mliW n ( a,ln m� / 5 e9307'2iT'E�47 6, 7 — — /— • , (AT Pa on ! YRetOLo ZOMa CwE) IRS t[R all' or Ya4Aalt0 I.N. Oa.3 �\ �C aIAP,A4 A VaRr EARYOII kaml ttE ai LOi I' —• Pw� / (AM SmLLf 310 AOa1KN) W SiR[trIS morscH I I Im e10Y f ewml�, rµ�A N�as'rRa \ / r Y � All, ao wvk smAd .-..• — ' .- .- . — —T I MaX1KaLa enwNTY R."riLOaMa \ Ws . ' \• / •f' tM 6 vACA4A l\ t /� wcof06 Tas-EN-m4) DAIfn \ / \ .Cinca OOUPi \\ CY ak OT la.M.sAm WT7 trwolue: rs LEOAILr aooastNe Joe Aw TIE P/Aal coA.sES al \ '�$'� 11 ` a otlRYals[ Dosr rMAxNwr'Sr,aE'� ,pAF ammuar+ rEaaaalrs Fw ns alne5�r wq,*°�' Crry ,' \Qi+ rlsr LM Ls Lm i,�a :: ,' -•`'. \ \ \ '" ��,�$ ����'�� g�a j ICI I wiener \ a, \ O i\ 5 001010 • I LEGEND Pw MI� YAYIw.[ \ ,' r:',1 'v..•.:. ...i�,.. \ -!i\ '�' � N. R l3 R1LK eASN \ ,• v * , \ Y� At 11E=TrE Lg1 PP Q m`sEW raE ':.L a • a ms sw1Er v+a I §I wv• rA+a1 vuac \ \ :•"�•,•• c •• \ \ I la al V D ilea PaE 1 t'' Im 1. taatK I sox e ,: I�r• t'i't % M4T nPE NwAMT dYL ^.•'��.. Yin " na sac 3' ' - .'R'--'-�. • •� - SiNEI Owl uunR _..t.' 1 r* pl . ¢mono mANVVeEw � \ \ sErvAa I .; 5:r ',:�;. -. i r •r'' '• "•.!:: z:� ; c r ; >'.:;.q., ".;",:;'�1;;•;:A .• . .ht: 1. i „�. "•:!i •:,; '.7:+.;. i1NQ iLVMaE MIVIPL hVi: \ \\ `\ {•}f•�i�'_,•a .}f'; a':�' i•'.. .•4 Gal OEEIPO MAVAE +Te'•• ',.7' .F:'y•- a u Lrnx is •� Q0 A R. sun err �•e. / u �_.•,., �x ^'r�r.... • n.10 raE '.4pl�r ''S4'iy e S `: - ,:k•, I; :''i,;:r`, .,y'.n�.; B :> . \ \ `aA�''trr\ ii I Y•::: r•1:'a',.• a ,T•,•v� "' ;•ir,�::; "A'.t'+i4i'•rt'vF • aIAiO PRT , 1 MN ".t,',, .��•;':'1' \ `` \\ nL ,r � / , '.�0. J . 1 e •:•�l�� A•: ::. .• .!'.;f_, r., •. .. ,til?;:a;.n,.: f.. '. 'I:JT;(F: t ;Art ` :l`: \ ?> \�� , fr,N•. 'S:.... �ir +:v.•'YRi:••:tr .:.: r. r, 3'; %,:,�,.~t•'.'':'SE. .b sal / �/ V YH„ \ =61 � • �•C:.;au• .'.A "t .l}j+� !.d:.�_ ti`•, ✓.'. , :r: kite+ -u[- LeerAwoLro aECmc wS / --urr- - - worAAm*wH YiRA UNwU/Ya9/a s1 0xrtULC ilD a VI KNE IlES / / DA a .Ar .: .Ry .1't+•. \ \\ "\ \ f P s%appoCEe7 r 'PaTa eaiI 0bL1 allo ,Ntir : ^;V, Y OQ M `v : .,'I''�.S"�`'�.�•';�. ..• .}. p:r+:; ,..q .•y r•; . 4j ,'�n Ri: A:;•� 'i1�,: .y �' � ".1, a .'r"•.e•Lh.: i +r `+.:: : :t,.� _., ? „+ � � OYr "+�•� � ; %. te � , rti _ ,: � : � ^: . }t:'uA i . P- �;'•i }i !!• ^: ri i id; s PYa19a1 / '• {li \ \ \ V ^.MU1Rawe0w. -•:a ":`::: ::1n,JA'r ,•' ;'�' >1•`t%a'; i(lisl�:, ^r >, p) wrA.7.4® guano its: � ' �' 3a Mumx) -Irli • \ \ lid t.;;r rp;'a,.r�.�:s:`µ.:"'.,r•3y.s , t�; �;r?: "': 1�c:,. .. ": ,.r+; eou�ar ms s,ARxr \ \ '1%." :'r'.,•T•,• .:,;r :. a)..:•': ,,.,y s•, :y.,i �EN01F9IEma �••. `' \ y. \�� A �.: •r`'; ,':. ?`• �:�; ;a,V4:' - :i "'.1.:; x':.:,v:•'� ' + r`, :• pJEw3a11 As le, M15 a' '• : � ,i: lt{'/ `'V @ 1MN ••ai idF ';l'�,: ^'n •.. �',i. ':,�.�':J : ,i•S r,',::::. N PI � s-1 a+o Amllal A •ti al.. / *�, +rr:. .',• m2i 5L Mahal �� H,t ..1 \•' "i•+e 5;. ..' •::�t?•.l,,a l`';"ivf�'•L �:"'`: ?�;r"'..:,� =j':. afMRES mrFU -_ �- ,,• `• ", F•'F•; ''t•i/ ,•, . -- �•.i ''lt `G:,., N•�t :'f'iCy ;�ti,,G• °r'•:'E't .+1. �.l •i •. -,.. :f- h\n,i�' Raw afERlOe � •,,t, "+ ::.;'.,:,.'\ /y� �?.• 7','.t:'),<.. 1:,: r: .. a LI It1Q \:'".V . \'., ,. �_ {.I -:.: .4..e5 �C ,�� I'%.:.i ":''. F`.'r',ftr:'.'. .v f.. _., „{•i oOtoES rva XW9 5UWACNO _ y' R \f =.L: :: ::f: k.• .i.7. ,. .:.:•''4'"r '• • iH'wLSrq�W(A "'SEyS : :',1.%iv'��'; r: "n '�4 owoE7 GCtKRI[ SLYEAtaa \ ,1 W •• \ \ D •I ' T'PoR'C ; Z `� ti_.:,• J `, r ' ` r• .'•'t . -.� ���,yA t` \ ` ?> \\ : . a'C {n'r ;aa,.r; ly1 •rr..a. • .4.•,,�•' °*';1' NRe %nowk Klmaia: SisiM \ \ •. �' Y6, r;l/� \ \ \ B @Y` t•' �1 "',''" ! ''' ^ � '- -1._.,:.. � +"" " •[,,Gtr.. -a,, Ras sax w0 wa xa NOTES CORRESPONDING TO SCHEDULE B \ FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY TMb` 'k i+'; `\ \4 F'• +'�-_. +, ,r' -' COMMITMENT N0. NCS- 806819B -PHXI O \ ,,,"abj,� +,, ..:� Sy�, ` \ r?rair'� =- >4J:;'A�'•;t•.;; .. ,,�. DATED AUGUST 12, 2016 \ , ;. /G, r• ; \ \ n'+; :: l -�`, •' NOTES 10. RESERVATION OF ALL MINERALS ANO MINERAL RIGHTS BY THE STATE OF \ : `1 \ \�;` ^+i .r -':,$ i "'F " ~,:.•. ", L ,p 9gYLY W. (pOUara won A nneA W. R,EOIK Eenl s Aital v� `•\ `"�:.`• „"'.' ":, .,•v' • -. ' \ \ - +• •. J',:;:hti ' f' an lntA 4$-14 a eS KaEYE,e W AFFECTS SUBJECT P T FOR THE BLANKET E IN NATURE DISTRICTS, 1 sLE aaNwaXS INaR aMXR to Poms"Y UNIS AK YFAW.Y® AFFECTS 9JBJECT PROPERTY. BLANKET W NATURE MM ae MgNEY to eAa rnaaln LLNES. \ ' •`•I •;„ \ IP• "+Y�; 'F' " '. 1 uL aeuYAr AXP sil�r rMOAT Owd9(NS aroal Av[ Y[ARwkD rAfE 11, EASEMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF '•'. •I ,'' '``, ,,i•, ' ` 6 tea To EAM OF Glw. LINER awe. MOim. 90TH STREET 3RO ADDITION RECORDED DECEMBER 30, 2005, AS DOCUMENT N0. \ "' '.'•r• L wlaE 6 ne w�v'AaE [vuKa a ma7rAES on areM aw.wA a 992949. ((AFFECTS TRACT 1} \ A., ,,; J••.: \ \• = ';fr'� RAVmn,3 ON Sw4r PAa[srt. AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY AND ARE PLOTTED AND SHOWN HEREON. ,• • • `+. . IV K NO Kro WE4 ,ssoSW N1:AY an wAltnrAH 6aOOLwJ ' . \.a • - ^:i V \ OX a xANNO str[ai PnatAtt. 12. CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN ORDER 114 -005 CRANTNI6 CONOITIONAL USE PFFIWT, '�' UP e ur -.0w4 NAEER Ili u PFP AI.01E aovro IYE" . RECORDED APRIL 2. 2014, AS DOCUMENT NO. A1260647. (AFFECTS TRACT I) Y. AaaaS rs aA'rm N tm arearr PealeiT WA ,Nero mM IEn, AFFECTS SUBJECT PROPERTY, RLARXET W NATURE PARKING SUMMARY \ ��' ; +� .;•:;. \ \ ,Rv 0 A -- mE.uo NWIT- V-rAr. NO STRIPED PARKING SPACES a `'••• �' , \ \ (• etaE a RO oesMME CY0012 ! O MEM Fax, runluq 14, EASEMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES, AS SHOWN ON ME ON SUBJECT PROPERTY \ ; ,`•; ;"!, •.1'v owRSmJOwN Oe ewaxo AoaraN awe teu>rT warns RECORDED FLAT OF BOTH STREET 2ND ADDITION, RECORDED APRIL 12, 2001, AS \ '' •" •' "'�'+ \ s We1E AFE xo Q,Vu x 51161 PORT a'IAY MaS AM mwsEiLO DDCUMENT NO. 73744& (AFFECTS TRACT 2) FLOOD ZONE \ r ''•�::' %'e;:" , • , �r`t';`;: ;:A,�;: m maYOSA Naf AYA'AAaE m011 -oo Q-9 Am�lOww AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY ANO ARE PLOTRO AND SHOWN HEREON, SUBJECT PROr'ER7Y LIES WITHIN 8000 ZONE "X' 1 lisAE a w R.411V--WK mlr S1Rif Q) >aErlll( M .` •'•;..gTQ'G ggyOgR (AREAS OETE71MwW TO SE W1510E 500 -YEAR _ O. rttY[ rs MO Atu caOOriH a 511 Ox A$ A sL4n WAS[ tuun. 15. ACCESS LIMITATIONS IN FAVOR O' THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, AS SET FORTH STATEMENT OF APPARENT ENCROACHMENTS FLOOD PLAIN) ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL rH "`••'' t.`:: ,'' ,',`,`y 9M a wETM�i L IN WARRANTY DEED DATED AUGUST 24, 1966, RECORDED OCTOBER 0, 1968, IN EMERGORCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD I i �.•',;i. .; %•,' MONUMENT SIGN ENCROACHE5 INTO CHELSEA ROAD WEST \ 1L xo nul4a a romna. EnAws YDE RSOIVm al nE eeECT BOOK 209 OF DEWS, PACE 104. AN AIS DOCUMENT N0. SHOWN . (AFFECTS TRACT R) INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL _ PIOROrn Ai me RE 1X1 ew1[T wAS Caeue[O, hat NAVE e[ Kmko AFFECTS SUBJECT PROPERTY AND IS PLOTTED AND SNOYN HEREON. RIGHT O WAY 2J FEET. NUMBER 270534 -0015 B. DATED AUGUST 4, ooawESlrAnm ! AHY YLRLAros RPio IaCAm a m: 9m Ear 1988, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA \ \ I SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 3801 CHELSEA ROAD WEST SINGLE STORY CONCRETE BLOCK a , VEHICLE SALES/SERVICE BlI2DIN0 �g,� 6Ueaa0 FOaMNT APGa,aeR E0. Ff, p.�� �� 1 .:' . IJ.S FEET The Malth.wa Company, Na: " "�': • "'; "'' ' � _ COMMITMENT N0, NCS- 806919D -PHXI ,.. ,,, gr•ti: a-'"�, :rt i mad. occardanw I ALTA/NSPS Land TIU. Surveys, Jointly estobl ed and dopted by AL7A ond NSPS, e, 9, 10(tl), 13, 14, DATED AUGUST 12, 2016 d hdudea It... 1, 2, 3, 4, 6(a), 6(b). 7( . 7(b)(1 ), 7(c), 10, 17, and 20 of Table A thawt Th. 8d4 work was complied on. 6YgI% Tract N That park of Let I, IRxk I. 90th SWet 3rd Addllfon, which It.. Gotr. // `` \ \p11111NNAi ft"..'tUY f rocated Chdse. C-t ee dedlcaled M 90th Streak rx Mark V. Y•r I Minnewta Re91sMOUon No, IE4 � a Y Won N . 1 Addition, Nrlght County, Min—W. 11AY : >w.: x. -••. • PM ' ': '? r Properly la Ab,t -t M4T nPE NwAMT dYL ^.•'��.. Yin " na sac 3' ' - .'R'--'-�. • •� - SiNEI Owl uunR _..t.' 1 r* pl . ¢mono mANVVeEw � \ \ sErvAa I .; 5:r ',:�;. -. i r •r'' '• "•.!:: z:� ; c r ; >'.:;.q., ".;",:;'�1;;•;:A .• . .ht: 1. i „�. "•:!i •:,; '.7:+.;. i1NQ iLVMaE MIVIPL hVi: \ \\ `\ {•}f•�i�'_,•a .}f'; a':�' i•'.. .•4 Gal OEEIPO MAVAE +Te'•• ',.7' .F:'y•- a u Lrnx is •� Q0 A R. sun err �•e. / u �_.•,., �x ^'r�r.... • n.10 raE '.4pl�r ''S4'iy e S `: - ,:k•, I; :''i,;:r`, .,y'.n�.; B :> . \ \ `aA�''trr\ ii I Y•::: r•1:'a',.• a ,T•,•v� "' ;•ir,�::; "A'.t'+i4i'•rt'vF • aIAiO PRT , 1 MN ".t,',, .��•;':'1' \ `` \\ nL ,r � / , '.�0. J . 1 e •:•�l�� A•: ::. .• .!'.;f_, r., •. .. ,til?;:a;.n,.: f.. '. 'I:JT;(F: t ;Art ` :l`: \ ?> \�� , fr,N•. 'S:.... �ir +:v.•'YRi:••:tr .:.: r. r, 3'; %,:,�,.~t•'.'':'SE. .b sal / �/ V YH„ \ =61 � • �•C:.;au• .'.A "t .l}j+� !.d:.�_ ti`•, ✓.'. , :r: kite+ -u[- LeerAwoLro aECmc wS / --urr- - - worAAm*wH YiRA UNwU/Ya9/a s1 0xrtULC ilD a VI KNE IlES / / DA a .Ar .: .Ry .1't+•. \ \\ "\ \ f P s%appoCEe7 r 'PaTa eaiI 0bL1 allo ,Ntir : ^;V, Y OQ M `v : .,'I''�.S"�`'�.�•';�. ..• .}. p:r+:; ,..q .•y r•; . 4j ,'�n Ri: A:;•� 'i1�,: .y �' � ".1, a .'r"•.e•Lh.: i +r `+.:: : :t,.� _., ? „+ � � OYr "+�•� � ; %. te � , rti _ ,: � : � ^: . }t:'uA i . P- �;'•i }i !!• ^: ri i id; s PYa19a1 / '• {li \ \ \ V ^.MU1Rawe0w. -•:a ":`::: ::1n,JA'r ,•' ;'�' >1•`t%a'; i(lisl�:, ^r >, p) wrA.7.4® guano its: � ' �' 3a Mumx) -Irli • \ \ lid t.;;r rp;'a,.r�.�:s:`µ.:"'.,r•3y.s , t�; �;r?: "': 1�c:,. .. ": ,.r+; eou�ar ms s,ARxr \ \ '1%." :'r'.,•T•,• .:,;r :. a)..:•': ,,.,y s•, :y.,i �EN01F9IEma �••. `' \ y. \�� A �.: •r`'; ,':. ?`• �:�; ;a,V4:' - :i "'.1.:; x':.:,v:•'� ' + r`, :• pJEw3a11 As le, M15 a' '• : � ,i: lt{'/ `'V @ 1MN ••ai idF ';l'�,: ^'n •.. �',i. ':,�.�':J : ,i•S r,',::::. N PI � s-1 a+o Amllal A •ti al.. / *�, +rr:. .',• m2i 5L Mahal �� H,t ..1 \•' "i•+e 5;. ..' •::�t?•.l,,a l`';"ivf�'•L �:"'`: ?�;r"'..:,� =j':. afMRES mrFU -_ �- ,,• `• ", F•'F•; ''t•i/ ,•, . -- �•.i ''lt `G:,., N•�t :'f'iCy ;�ti,,G• °r'•:'E't .+1. �.l •i •. -,.. :f- h\n,i�' Raw afERlOe � •,,t, "+ ::.;'.,:,.'\ /y� �?.• 7','.t:'),<.. 1:,: r: .. a LI It1Q \:'".V . \'., ,. �_ {.I -:.: .4..e5 �C ,�� I'%.:.i ":''. F`.'r',ftr:'.'. .v f.. _., „{•i oOtoES rva XW9 5UWACNO _ y' R \f =.L: :: ::f: k.• .i.7. ,. .:.:•''4'"r '• • iH'wLSrq�W(A "'SEyS : :',1.%iv'��'; r: "n '�4 owoE7 GCtKRI[ SLYEAtaa \ ,1 W •• \ \ D •I ' T'PoR'C ; Z `� ti_.:,• J `, r ' ` r• .'•'t . -.� ���,yA t` \ ` ?> \\ : . a'C {n'r ;aa,.r; ly1 •rr..a. • .4.•,,�•' °*';1' NRe %nowk Klmaia: SisiM \ \ •. �' Y6, r;l/� \ \ \ B @Y` t•' �1 "',''" ! ''' ^ � '- -1._.,:.. � +"" " •[,,Gtr.. -a,, Ras sax w0 wa xa NOTES CORRESPONDING TO SCHEDULE B \ FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY TMb` 'k i+'; `\ \4 F'• +'�-_. +, ,r' -' COMMITMENT N0. NCS- 806819B -PHXI O \ ,,,"abj,� +,, ..:� Sy�, ` \ r?rair'� =- >4J:;'A�'•;t•.;; .. ,,�. DATED AUGUST 12, 2016 \ , ;. /G, r• ; \ \ n'+; :: l -�`, •' NOTES 10. RESERVATION OF ALL MINERALS ANO MINERAL RIGHTS BY THE STATE OF \ : `1 \ \�;` ^+i .r -':,$ i "'F " ~,:.•. ", L ,p 9gYLY W. (pOUara won A nneA W. R,EOIK Eenl s Aital v� `•\ `"�:.`• „"'.' ":, .,•v' • -. ' \ \ - +• •. J',:;:hti ' f' an lntA 4$-14 a eS KaEYE,e W AFFECTS SUBJECT P T FOR THE BLANKET E IN NATURE DISTRICTS, 1 sLE aaNwaXS INaR aMXR to Poms"Y UNIS AK YFAW.Y® AFFECTS 9JBJECT PROPERTY. BLANKET W NATURE MM ae MgNEY to eAa rnaaln LLNES. \ ' •`•I •;„ \ IP• "+Y�; 'F' " '. 1 uL aeuYAr AXP sil�r rMOAT Owd9(NS aroal Av[ Y[ARwkD rAfE 11, EASEMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF '•'. •I ,'' '``, ,,i•, ' ` 6 tea To EAM OF Glw. LINER awe. MOim. 90TH STREET 3RO ADDITION RECORDED DECEMBER 30, 2005, AS DOCUMENT N0. \ "' '.'•r• L wlaE 6 ne w�v'AaE [vuKa a ma7rAES on areM aw.wA a 992949. ((AFFECTS TRACT 1} \ A., ,,; J••.: \ \• = ';fr'� RAVmn,3 ON Sw4r PAa[srt. AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY AND ARE PLOTTED AND SHOWN HEREON. ,• • • `+. . IV K NO Kro WE4 ,ssoSW N1:AY an wAltnrAH 6aOOLwJ ' . \.a • - ^:i V \ OX a xANNO str[ai PnatAtt. 12. CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN ORDER 114 -005 CRANTNI6 CONOITIONAL USE PFFIWT, '�' UP e ur -.0w4 NAEER Ili u PFP AI.01E aovro IYE" . RECORDED APRIL 2. 2014, AS DOCUMENT NO. A1260647. (AFFECTS TRACT I) Y. AaaaS rs aA'rm N tm arearr PealeiT WA ,Nero mM IEn, AFFECTS SUBJECT PROPERTY, RLARXET W NATURE PARKING SUMMARY \ ��' ; +� .;•:;. \ \ ,Rv 0 A -- mE.uo NWIT- V-rAr. NO STRIPED PARKING SPACES a `'••• �' , \ \ (• etaE a RO oesMME CY0012 ! O MEM Fax, runluq 14, EASEMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES, AS SHOWN ON ME ON SUBJECT PROPERTY \ ; ,`•; ;"!, •.1'v owRSmJOwN Oe ewaxo AoaraN awe teu>rT warns RECORDED FLAT OF BOTH STREET 2ND ADDITION, RECORDED APRIL 12, 2001, AS \ '' •" •' "'�'+ \ s We1E AFE xo Q,Vu x 51161 PORT a'IAY MaS AM mwsEiLO DDCUMENT NO. 73744& (AFFECTS TRACT 2) FLOOD ZONE \ r ''•�::' %'e;:" , • , �r`t';`;: ;:A,�;: m maYOSA Naf AYA'AAaE m011 -oo Q-9 Am�lOww AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY ANO ARE PLOTRO AND SHOWN HEREON, SUBJECT PROr'ER7Y LIES WITHIN 8000 ZONE "X' 1 lisAE a w R.411V--WK mlr S1Rif Q) >aErlll( M .` •'•;..gTQ'G ggyOgR (AREAS OETE71MwW TO SE W1510E 500 -YEAR _ O. rttY[ rs MO Atu caOOriH a 511 Ox A$ A sL4n WAS[ tuun. 15. ACCESS LIMITATIONS IN FAVOR O' THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, AS SET FORTH STATEMENT OF APPARENT ENCROACHMENTS FLOOD PLAIN) ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL rH "`••'' t.`:: ,'' ,',`,`y 9M a wETM�i L IN WARRANTY DEED DATED AUGUST 24, 1966, RECORDED OCTOBER 0, 1968, IN EMERGORCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD I i �.•',;i. .; %•,' MONUMENT SIGN ENCROACHE5 INTO CHELSEA ROAD WEST \ 1L xo nul4a a romna. EnAws YDE RSOIVm al nE eeECT BOOK 209 OF DEWS, PACE 104. AN AIS DOCUMENT N0. SHOWN . (AFFECTS TRACT R) INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL _ PIOROrn Ai me RE 1X1 ew1[T wAS Caeue[O, hat NAVE e[ Kmko AFFECTS SUBJECT PROPERTY AND IS PLOTTED AND SNOYN HEREON. RIGHT O WAY 2J FEET. NUMBER 270534 -0015 B. DATED AUGUST 4, ooawESlrAnm ! AHY YLRLAros RPio IaCAm a m: 9m Ear 1988, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA \ \ `R''L` ^` =' .y; ;''r• I SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS Fr..d- Rood., LL4 Fret Amerlcat TU. I—ene. Company, FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY The Malth.wa Company, Na: " "�': • "'; "'' ' � _ COMMITMENT N0, NCS- 806919D -PHXI ,.. ,,, gr•ti: a-'"�, :rt i mad. occardanw I ALTA/NSPS Land TIU. Surveys, Jointly estobl ed and dopted by AL7A ond NSPS, e, 9, 10(tl), 13, 14, DATED AUGUST 12, 2016 d hdudea It... 1, 2, 3, 4, 6(a), 6(b). 7( . 7(b)(1 ), 7(c), 10, 17, and 20 of Table A thawt Th. 8d4 work was complied on. 6YgI% Tract N That park of Let I, IRxk I. 90th SWet 3rd Addllfon, which It.. Gotr. // `` \ \p11111NNAi ft"..'tUY f rocated Chdse. C-t ee dedlcaled M 90th Streak rx Mark V. Y•r I Minnewta Re91sMOUon No, IE4 � a Y Won N . 1 Addition, Nrlght County, Min—W. 11AY : >w.: x. -••. • PM ' ': '? r Properly la Ab,t -t �i •1 °tile';;;, :f?:•z• FPa. 851-631 -0005 21 kempe W -nanat �AAllllllll \\ Tract 2: J Lot 1, 81-k 1, 90th Street 2nd Addition, —At that part platted Wright County, M�nasset- \ as 90th SU�.I 3rd AddlUOn, Properly is Ab,lrcet fie property Jen,"ad and .ham ha.on I. the same property ov •? For d..a�ee k Font Arnett- nee Insurane. C-Pany cammilment NCS - 8069199 -PHXI, dated August 12, 2018. a7 numbs rd: AREA SUMMARY TRACT 1 - 66.068 50, FT. OR 1.5764 ACRES TRACT 2 - 305.420 SO. FT. OR 7.0116 ACRES s4 TOTAL PROPERTY 374,092 S0. FT. ON 8.5880 ACRES `R''L` ^` =' .y; ;''r• I SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE T. FRHIF LNcdnshk4 LLC. CM, Inc.: Fr..d- Rood., LL4 Fret Amerlcat TU. I—ene. Company, YMr MrPwl+lwt d.�'M^+b. 19wtadw' l ,w+L t,•Lw M The Malth.wa Company, Na: " "�': • "'; "'' ' � _ 1Na la to ..Ufy that this ma a pkl a,td the arwy on which R b baa.d were F wllh Ih. Role MWmum 6tandwd Oeta2 Requ9eL la ,.. ,,, gr•ti: a-'"�, :rt i mad. occardanw I ALTA/NSPS Land TIU. Surveys, Jointly estobl ed and dopted by AL7A ond NSPS, e, 9, 10(tl), 13, 14, .slf�ti+ri• 'uonf%aa'',' 7,;.: •� d hdudea It... 1, 2, 3, 4, 6(a), 6(b). 7( . 7(b)(1 ), 7(c), 10, 17, and 20 of Table A thawt Th. 8d4 work was complied on. 6YgI% I "��NSPS�ND Gotr. // `` \ \p11111NNAi Nampa, L , Mark V. Y•r I Minnewta Re91sMOUon No, IE4 � a Y Won N . 1 , v,L+'�"•a I .. L•.•, , h • 'cWVa ....;.: Kemper t A..d.N Ina. _ CId Hlghw. 8 N.W. yy 84 I a�. : >w.: x. -••. • PM ' ': '? r Me Brl9hlon, Minnaaola 55112 i 'r Phone 651 -531 -0351 sLs �i •1 °tile';;;, :f?:•z• FPa. 851-631 -0005 21 kempe W -nanat �AAllllllll \\ Inc.® THE MATT EWS COMPANY 17220 Newhope SUeet, Suites 106 -110. Fountain Vdley, CA 92708 T,U (714)- 979 -7161 Far, (714) - 641 -2540 www.UanollMwuampany.cam Camping World and Good Sam ;d 3801 Chelsea Road W. Earn Monticello, MN 'as -- 8CAL611 "a {0' CM. /APYON h. DAM August 04, Role APPROVED: !4' 9 D[K. By. Todd He)- (1017CIING) J nwe e.�f'M et a�'r.4N MP' Sk,rwpa' `i't�w.* Nnu�rd `3 YMr MrPwl+lwt d.�'M^+b. 19wtadw' l ,w+L t,•Lw M Yd+MnIMc�i1 N 1: Ar»ada4 Ma caro•n rN e M ,r,dekX. a wl a r r N r �V � A[ pp y •(� we PN,e p xa Ton Y.1tla•, awrymw Ya an/ ProARr wnpv AnvA .fl Iwl Yk,N U. n d N Y hw Fe ay MM farir rtP•+a M 1M auw1�1 asYlknelM 6YgI% "��NSPS�ND IN TITLE SURVEYTITLE SURVEY" Kg E a PREPARED FOR: Inc.® THE MATT EWS COMPANY 17220 Newhope SUeet, Suites 106 -110. Fountain Vdley, CA 92708 T,U (714)- 979 -7161 Far, (714) - 641 -2540 www.UanollMwuampany.cam Camping World and Good Sam ;d 3801 Chelsea Road W. Earn Monticello, MN 'as -- 8CAL611 "a {0' CM. /APYON h. DAM August 04, Role APPROVED: !4' 9 D[K. By. Todd He)- (1017CIING) Tree Inventory for 3801 Chelsea Road in Monticello No. Tree Diameter (Inches) I Status 1 Silver maple i 4 2 Red Elm 4 3 Elder 2 ......_...._ . � ... .................. . _.... 4 _Box ....._. Box Elder 2 5 Red Elm 2 6 Red Elm 2 7 Red Elm 4 8 Red Elm 4 9 _... Red Elm 8 _. _. .. . . - 10 Black Ash 8 ............... _..... _ _....... 11 Boxelder I 6 12 Red Elm _�.. 13 .... Red Elm � ..__.... .... ..._1....- 2 14 Red Elm 2 15 Black Ash 8 16 Black Ash 8 17 Boxelder 6 18 .. f ( Red Pine 10 19 ( Red . 1.0 20 Black Ash 6 ...... ._... 21 _ Red Pine 10 - 22 ...._ I Red Pine 10 _ 23 Black Ash 6 24 Red Pine 8 25 I Red Elm 8 _ _ ... I Black Ash 4 �_ Remove _26_ ... 27 BlackAsh . 6 Remove 28 Black Ash j 6 I Remove 29 I Black Ash I 6 I Remove 30 _ Black Ash 6 Remove 31 Black Ash I 8 32 Black Ash 8 Remove 33 I Black Ash j 8 Remove 34 Black Ash I 8 I Remove 35 Bl I ack As h I 8 Remove _ .... 36 Black Ash 8 Remove 37 Black Ash ( .............. 8 .. .. Remove Black Ash 6- _. _. 39 Black Ash 40 I Black Ash j 8 41 Ash. �...... 42 I Black Ash ( _8 8 43 ' Black Ash 8 44 Black Ash ( 8 45 I Black Ash 8 46 I Black Ash 8 wss Building a legacy lieu., legacy. October 25, 2016 Ms. Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Camping World Site Plan Review City Project No. 2016 -045 WSB Project No. 02596 -350 Dear Ms. Schumann: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 - 5414800 Fax: 763 -541 -1700 We have reviewed the preliminary site plan, dated Sept 8, 2016, as prepared by Darwin Lindahl Architects and the preliminary, final plat, civil plans and stormwater calculations, dated October 5, 2016 as prepared by Hakanson Anderson and offer the following comments. Preliminary Site Plan 1. The impervious area noted as 28,571 square feet is incorrect. Please correct. 2. Remove the proposed storm sewer as identified on the site plan, as this is not being proposed for the site. Existing Topography and Removals Plan It appears that private utilities may need to be relocated /adjusted with telephone pedestals relocated to accommodate the infiltration basin. Please add this note to the plans and coordinate with utility companies. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan 4. Percent grades should be labeled for the parking lot and driveways. 5. Label the infiltration basin slopes. 6. Identify all emergency overflow routes and elevations for each catch basin on the grading plan. The EOF should be a minimum of 1.5' below the low building opening. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com 10251amc. October 25, 2016 Page 2 Details City standard detail plates 6002 and 6003 related to construction entrances shall be Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction located on the City's website- Engineering department. Stormwater Management 8. The downstream regional ponding along Cbelsea Road was designed to provide for rate control and water quality for the developed site. 9. The proposed site creates 1 acre or more of new impervious surface, thus volume reduction is required. The proposed infiltration basins shall designed in accordance to the MPCA's Design Criteria for Infiltration Basins. Enclosed is a stormwater plan review checklist that identifies comments the applicant shall address. 10. A SWPPP was provided for the site. This document was reviewed used the attached MPCA SWPPP checklist. The applicant shall revise the SWPPP to address the comments noted on the checklist. 11. The applicant shall enter into a stormwater maintenance agreement with the City. Enclosed is a template agreement the applicant shall complete. 12. The NPDES /SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit shall be provided with the grading permit or prior to application for review. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please give me a call at 763 - 271 -3236 if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter. Thank you. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Shibani K. Bisson, PE City Engineer cc: Steve Grittman, NAC skb K \01596350\ trio \DCsSLift a - scM1Umann- Camping World 102516.doa CITY of City of Monticello — Stormwater Site Plan Monticello Review A Stormwater Management Plan is required for: - Any land disturbing activity that may ultimately result in the addition of one acre or greater of impervious surfaces, including smaller individual sites that are part of a common plan of development that may be constructed at different times. - The construction of any new public or private road; or - Any land disturbance activity, regardless of size, that the City determines is likely to cause an adverse impact to an environmentally sensitive area or other property. Submittals Received Date Camping World /3801 Author 10/6/16 Name /Address: Chelsea Road West Permit No: Stormwater Management Plan Hakanson Anderson 155185001010, Drainage Calculations Hakanson Anderson PID: 155185001011 Date Approved: 9/30/16 Date Received: 10/5/16 Signature: ❑ • Grade elevation at the foundation and elevation of top of foundation of structures on Area of ❑ Site Size (acres): 2.12 ac Disturbance(acres): 2.12 ac Existing • Grade elevation at the foundation, elevation of top of foundation and garage floor of Proposed ❑ Impervious (acres): 0 Impervious (acres): 1.62 A Stormwater Management Plan is required for: - Any land disturbing activity that may ultimately result in the addition of one acre or greater of impervious surfaces, including smaller individual sites that are part of a common plan of development that may be constructed at different times. - The construction of any new public or private road; or - Any land disturbance activity, regardless of size, that the City determines is likely to cause an adverse impact to an environmentally sensitive area or other property. Submittals Received Date Document Author 10/6/16 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Hakanson Anderson 10/6/16 Stormwater Management Plan Hakanson Anderson 10/5/16 Drainage Calculations Hakanson Anderson 10/5/16 Complete Plans Hakanson Anderson 9/30/16 Final Plat Hakanson Anderson October2016 Yes No 1. Scale of Survey. Minimum scale 1" = 50'. Maximum size plan sheet 24" x 36" N ❑ 2. Survey signed by a registered survey with elevations in NGVD -1929 datum for the following locations: • Each lot corner N ❑ • Grade elevation at the foundation and elevation of top of foundation of structures on N ❑ adjacent lots • Grade elevation at the foundation, elevation of top of foundation and garage floor of ® ❑ proposed new construction • Lowest point of entry (i.e. door sill or top of window well) of proposed and existing ® ❑ construction • Lowest floor of proposed and existing construction N ❑ 3. Any proposed retaining wall must have a top and bottom elevation and bottom elevation ❑ ❑ would be finish grade. Also, no retaining wall is allowed to be built on private property 4. Retaining walls greater than 4.0 feet in height have been designed and certified by a El ❑ licensed professional engineer and a building permit has been acquired 5. All drainage and utility easements are shown? N ❑ October2016 6. Easements are clear of any encroachments? N ❑ 7. New curb cuts proposed? ❑ N 8. If new curb cut is proposed, stamp all survey maps with the curb cut stamp. Also, write a note on the Residential Plan & Routing Approval form reminding the builder that a curb ❑ ❑ cut permit is required if the driveway is moved or a new driveway is added 9. Low floor a minimum of 4.25' (feet) above the sanitary sewer invert elevation ❑ ❑ Comments 1. op'£Y!%g: g/'k•L" 'ass k�`e5'. rs"�d&*`.-£'e'. ❑ „ Modeling calculations for existing and proposed conditions using Atlas 14 storm events Yes 4 N04 I. SWPPP notes provided on the plan N ❑ 2. Temporary stabilization measures provided ❑ N 3. Erosion control blankets provided on all slopes greater than 3:1 N ❑ 4. Perimeter Control i.e., Silt Fence, Filter Log, etc. N ❑ 5. Phasing for sites that are? 1 acre N ❑ 6. CB Inlet Protection ❑ N 7. Dewatering N ❑ 8. Sediment control ❑ N 9. Waste control N ❑ 10. Concrete washout ❑ N 11. Rock entrance ❑ N 12. Street sweeping schedule ❑ N 13. Permanent restoration plan N ❑ 14. Erosion protection at all outlet pipes N ❑ 15. SWPPP includes an erosion and sediment control inspection schedule and person N ❑ responsible for maintenance Comments: See MPCA NPDES SWPPP Checklist 1. Delineation maps for existing and proposed conditions N ❑ 2. Modeling calculations for existing and proposed conditions using Atlas 14 storm events with an MSE3 type distribution. • 2 year 24 hr. (2.84 "), 10 year 24 hr. (4.22 "), 100 (6.87 "), 10 -day snowmelt (7.2 ") ❑ N Modeled direct connected impervious separate N ❑ 3. Off -site drainage included ❑ N 4. Wetlands shown on plans and wetland permitting completed ❑ N 5. Pretreatment N ❑ 6. Skimmer structures provided on the outlets of all ponds. N ❑ 7. Soil borings ❑ N 8. Design Infiltration Rate Determination - Geotechnical Report or Infiltration Testing ❑ N provided 9. Seasonal High Water Elevation N ❑ October2016 10. Open channel flow calculations 11. Storm sewer calculations — 10 year event 12. Narrative describing the following: a. Existing Conditions: Open field adj b. Proposed Conditions: Expansion of 1 c. Stormwater Management for Proposed Site: Comments: to existine Darkine lot ❑ ❑ ❑ N sump pretreatment, rate control met mal basin. 6.87" for the 100 year storm was not used. Use MSE3 Distribution. A 1.1" storm event was modeled in HydroCAD, however this is not needed. The 1.1" runoff for volume reduction is not the rain amount, but rather the actual runoff over impervious surfaces. The HydroCAD model for proposed conditions shows 1.69 acres of impervious area, whereas the Stormwater Management Plan describes proposed conditions as having 70,533 square feet (1.62 ac) of impervious area. Please correct for consistency. A Stormwater maintenance agreement for the infiltration basin and sump manhole will need to be executed. The City will provide a template agreement. October 2016 Y�TIde{'3X�'D #MIIAfiCPI%/1 SlllZ4�! ¢f13NPCA:11i!)Fi�Mt/ITJ1fJlACi T%tM1S�$A�S`,rA)f�l�rMSIS iR CXIA/%lCY+�bflNDTttt¢C7IP ZDAi1t,� „i%PIl %XIAi7C$” " 'SP¢ll'DXl�,.�O ;iXS t�%itrAiSDtl'�¢5{'�A ¢P1fPNf "A ASfIPSPP%LPl1 X73'1�1P iNACYj .'�XOPDAlYAXPt?NAIiAA(SltdTl SIP jrDXi01V�t,�DPY%IQpPDj)p$P7I 1. Volume control provided as per the City's Engineering Design Standards and MIDS (1.1" ® ❑ over new impervious surface) 2. Impervious area equal to or greater than the net increase in impervious surface is routed infiltration BMP ® El 3. Sequencing provided for alternatives where infiltration is infeasible ❑ ❑ Unclear 4. Required Volume Reduction: 6,546 5. Provided Volume Reduction: cf 6. Separation to groundwater and /or bedrock is a minimum of 3 feet from bottom of 11 El BMP 7. Drawdown time for infiltration BMP is within 48 hours ❑ ❑ 8. Proposed ponds meet or exceed NURP design criteria ❑ ❑ 9. If infiltration of 1.1" is not feasible, water quality goals are met with NURP pond on site? ❑ ❑ Comments: October 2016 The design infiltration rate of 0.45 in /hr needs to be verified with soil borings and/or infiltration testing prior to construction activities. The depth of the BMP meets the 48 hour drawdown time if this infiltration rate can be confirmed. A 3 foot separation to groundwater and/or bedrock from the infiltration basin bottom needs to be confirmed. The required infiltration volume for this project is either based on 1.62 acres of impervious area or 1.69 acres of impervious area. Please correct for consistency. .- ERS Yes q No 1. Peak Proposed Discharge Rates < Existing ® ❑ 2. Existing infrastructure can accommodate peak discharge rates for 10 year storm? ® ❑ 3. Existing infrastructure and EOF for proposed 100 year peak discharge rate? ® ❑ 4. Proposed flow patterns do not create flooding impacts for structures adjacent to the ® ❑ property? Comments: Provide the existing conditions HydroCAD model. Rate control will be met at regional downstream basin. S Yes No's '[ 1. Building Opening: 2' above the critical 100 -yr HWL of local basins, wetlands, & infiltration basins ® ❑ • 2' above EOF of local basins, wetlands, & infiltration basins ® ❑ 2' above the 100 -yr flow elevation of a Swale or channel at the point where the Swale ® ❑ channel is closest to the building 2. Low Floor Elevation: • 2' above the critical 100 -yr HWL of major basins ® ❑ 2' above EOF of major basins ® ❑ • For landlocked basins: 2' above the HWL from back to back 100 -yr rainfalls or 2' above the HWL from the 100 -yr 10 -day snowmelt, whichever is higher. Starting elevation of the basin/waterbody prior to runoff is one of the following: • Existing Ordinary High Water level established by the Minnesota Department ❑ ❑ of Natural Resources • Annual water balance calculation approved by the City ❑ ❑ • Local observation well records, as approved by the City ❑ ❑ • Mottled soil ❑ ❑ October2016 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North St Paul, MN 55155 -4194 SWPPP Checklist Construction Stormwater Permit Program Doc Type: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) �c000 Background: This checklist is used by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) staff for Stomlwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) reviews. It is provided as an additional resource intended for SWPPP designers for construction projects to assure all required elements of a SWPPP are included. Use of this checklist will help you to determine if your SWPPP is complete, though not all checklist items are applicable to all projects. This checklist can be used for all size projects; however, the guidance document "Stormwater Compliance Assistance Toolkit for Small Construction Operators," contains a SWPPP template designed specifically for small site projects. This guidance is available on the MPCA Construction Stormwater webpage at: http.,//www.pca.state.m.n.us/wfhya5b. Note - This checklist is for your information and use is voluntary. The checklist does not need to be returned to the MPCA. Review Information Applicant: FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC Project name: Camping World Parking Lot Expansion Application date: 10/24/16 Reviewer name: Meghan Litsey, WSB Reason for review: Yes N/A ❑ ® Mandatory (over 50 acres and discharging to a ® ❑ special or impaired water) ❑ ® Random audit ❑ ® Enforcement case ® ❑ Case lead: SWPPP contains a combination of: Yes N/A ® ❑ Narrative ® ❑ Plan sheets ® ❑ Standard detail sheets (where appropriate) SWPPP Information (does the Narrative contain the following) Notes Yes N/A ® ❑ Describe the nature of the construction activity? ® ❑ Address the potential for a discharge of sediment and /or other potential pollutants from the site? ❑ ❑ Propose erosion prevention and sediment control Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control the discharge of sediment and /or other potential pollutants (IV.F) from the site. ® ❑ Identify the person knowledgeable and experienced who will oversee the implementation of the SWPPP; the installation, inspection, and maintenance of the BMPs. ® ❑ Identify the entity (name or title) responsible for performing future Operations and Maintenance (0 &M) of the permanent stormwater management system? ® ❑ List the chain of responsibility for SWPPP implementation for all operators on the site? ® ❑ Identify the training requirements are satisfied. ® ❑ Include the designs and calculations for BMPs. ® ❑ Describe installation timing for all Erosion Sediment Control (ESC) Best Management Practices (BMPs)? ® ❑ Describe procedures to amend the SWPPP and establish additional temporary ESC BMPs as necessary for site conditions? ® ❑ Describe final stabilization methods for all exposed areas? (may be in narrative or on plan sheets) ❑ ® Identify stormwater management measures needed to mitigate impacts identified as a result of environmental, historical, archaeological, or rare species reviews conducted for the project? ❑ ® Identify additional measures being taken to protect Drinking Water Supply Management Areas? ❑ ❑ If site discharges to special water or impaired reach, identify any site areas discharging to the special or impaired reach? ® ❑ Methods used to minimize soil compaction and preserve topsoil must be described. ❑ ® Identify construction areas that are adjacent to and drain to Public Waters for which the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has promulgated 'Work in waters restrictions" during specified fish spawning time frames. www.pca.state.mn.us 651- 296 -6300 800- 657 -3864 TTY 651- 282 -5332 or 800- 657 -3864 • Available in alternative formats wq- strm2 -47 • 4110114 Page 1 of 7 ® ❑ In designing the stormwater controls, the SWPPP must account for expected amount, frequency, intensity, and duration of precipitation. ® ❑ In designing the stormwater controls, the SWPPP must account for nature of stormwater runoff and run -on at the site, including factors such as expected flow from impervious surfaces, slopes, and site drainage features. ® ❑ In designing the stormwater controls, the SWPPP must account for the range of soil particle sizes expected to be present on the site. ❑ ® Identify any specific chemicals and the chemical treatment systems that may be used for enhancing the sedimentation process on the site, and how compliance will be achieved with the permit requirements. ❑ ® For design requirements or SWPPP components where Permittee determines that compliance with the requirement is infeasible; the SWPPP must document that determination and the substitute BMPs. - Methods to provide temporary stabilization are not clear in the SWPPP or on the plan sheets. Provide estimated Comments: quantities and update flan sheets to describe proposed methods for temporary stabilization. -On Sheet C3 in the plan set, Note 5 under the'Reference Notes' section calls for the use of MnDOT Seed Mix 35- 241 (General Roadside) at 73 Ibs /acre to stabilize the infiltration basin. This is an inappropriate seed mix for this feature and should be replaced with a stormwater - related seed mix. _ -The SWPPP does not identify all receiving waters or if the project discharges to an impaired or special water. Update the SWPPP to address receiving waters within one mile of the project, and whether or not Appendix A requirements apply. Do plan sheets identify: Yes N/A ® ❑ Existing and final grades. ❑ ❑ Locations and types of all temporary and permanent (including infiltration areas) ESC BMPs. ❑ ❑ Stormwater flow directions and surface water divides for all pre- and post- construction drainage areas. ® ❑ Impervious areas (Pre- and Post- Construction). ID ❑ Soil types. ❑ ❑ Locations of potential pollutant - generating activities. ® ❑ Locations of areas not to be disturbed (buffer zones). ❑ ❑ Tabulated quantifies of all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs. ® ❑ Location of areas where construction will be phased to minimize duration of exposed soil areas. ® ❑ Areas of steep (3:1 or greater slope). ❑ ❑ Locations of all wetlands, surface waters, and storm ponds that will receive pre- or post - construction site runoff. (If they do not fit on the plan sheets, use an arrow to note the direction and distance). -The following temporary or permanent BMPs are missing from the plan sheets: temporary stabilization measures, rigorous controls for protection of the infiltration basin (Part III.D.1.c), locations catch basin inlet protection, location of rock entrance /exit. Update the plan sheets to include locations of all proposed temporary and permanent ESC BMPs. In addition, perimeter controls are lacking in the NE comer of the erosion control plan; add additional perimeter controls to the NE comer of the project location. -Pre- and post - construction flow directions are missing from the plan sheets. Update the plan sheets to include Comments: both pre- and post- construction flow directions. - Locations of potential pollutant - generating activities are missing from the plan sheets. Update the plan sheets to indicate proposed location of pollutant- generating activities. - Tabulated quantities are missing for temporary stabilization measures, permanent stabilization measures, energy dissipation at pipe outlet(s). Provide tabulated quantities of all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs. - Standard plates are missing for inlet protection and erosion control blanket installation. Provide standard plates for all Dr000sed erosion and sediment control BMPs. - Locations of all wetlands, surface waters, and storm ponds that will receive pre- or post- construction site runoff are missing. If they do not fit on the plan sheets, use an arrow to note the direction and distance. Standard plates or specifications: Yes N/A ❑ ❑ Are standard plates or specifications included where appropriate? Part III - Stormwater Discharge Design Requirements Yes N/A ❑ ® For any stormwater flow that will be channelized at the site, the stormwater controls must be designed to control both peak flowrates and total stormwater volume to minimize erosion at outlets and to minimize downstream channel and streambank erosion. ❑ ® Are Temporary Sediment Basins required on site? (10 acres draining to common location or 5 acres App. A) If Yes, are they: www.pca.state.mn.us 651- 296 -6300 800- 657 -3864 TTY 651- 282 -5332 or 800 -657 -3864 • Available in alternative formats wq- strm2 -47 • 4110114 Page 2 of 7 Yes N/A areas, and natural depressions). ❑ ❑ Adequately sized — 2 -year, 24 -hour storm, minimum 1,800 feet3 /acre; or no calculative minimum ❑ ❑ 3,600ft3 /acre? ❑ ❑ Designed to prevent short circuiting? ❑ ❑ Are outlets designed to remove floating debris? ❑ ❑ Are outlets designed to allow complete drawdown? ❑ ❑ Are outlets designed to withdraw water from the surface? ❑ ❑ Do outlets have energy dissipation? ❑ ❑ Have a stabilized emergency spillway? ❑ ❑ Sediment Basins must be situated outside of surface waters and any natural buffers. ❑ ❑ If compliant temporary sediment basin is not feasible due to site limitations, equivalent sediment controls ❑ ❑ described. Comments: Yes N/A ❑ ❑ Permanent Stormwater Management System Yes N/A ❑ ❑ Is calculation of new impervious surface included in SWPPP? ❑ ❑ Is the project located in and complying with Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) Permit permanent treatment in lieu of the permanent treatment requirements of this permit? ❑ ❑ Are calculations for permanent stormwater management system included (water quality volume of one inch of runoff to be retained on site)? ❑ ❑ If infiltration is prohibited, other methods of volume reduction are considered. ❑ ❑ If infiltration is prohibited, the remainder of the water quality volume is treated by a wet sedimentation basin, filtration system, regional ponding or equivalent methods prior to the discharge of stormwater to surface waters. ❑ ❑ Does the proximity to bedrock preclude the installation of any of the permanent stormwater management practices? If yes, has effort been made to provide some treatment using alternatives? Yes N/A ❑ ❑ Grassed swales ❑ ❑ Filtration systems ❑ ❑ Smaller ponds ❑ ❑ Grit chambers Comments: Which method of permanent stormwater treatment has been selected? Yes N/A ❑ ❑ Infiltration or filtration (infiltration basins, infiltration trenches, rainwater gardens, sand filters, organic filters, bioretention areas, and enhanced swales, dry storage ponds with underdrain discharge, off -line retention areas, and natural depressions). Yes NIA ❑ ❑ Is infiltration /filtration appropriate to the site and land uses? ❑ ❑ Has the system been designed to maintain pre- existing conditions (e.g., do not breach a perched water table that is supporting a wetland)? ❑ ❑ Requirements to avoid excavation of the infiltration system until drainage area constructed and stabilized? ❑ ❑ Are rigorous sediment and erosion controls planned to keep sediment and runoff away from the system? ❑ ❑ Is a pretreatment device planned? ❑ ❑ Is the filtration system designed to remove at least 80% of total suspended solids? ❑ ❑ Is the system sufficient to infiltrate or filter the appropriate water quality volume of one inch? ❑ ❑ Can water quality volume be discharged through the infiltration /filtration system in 48 hours or less? ❑ Additional flows must bypass and be routed through stabilized discharge point. ❑ ❑ Is there a way to visually verify the system is operating as designed? ❑ ❑ Has appropriate testing been conducted to ensure a minimum of three feet of separation to the seasonal water table and /or bedrock? www.pca.state.mn.us 651- 296 -6300 800 - 657 -3864 TTY 651 - 282 -5332 or 800- 657 -3864 • Available in alternative formats wq- strm2 -47 • 4110114 Page 3 of 7 ❑ ❑ Are calculations /computer model results included to demonstrate the design and adequacy of the infiltration or filtration system? ❑ ❑ Is adequate maintenance access provided? ❑ ❑ Is there a maintenance plan that identifies who will perform future maintenance? ❑ ❑ Infiltration is prohibited when the infiltration system will receive discharges from or be constructed in: ❑ Areas where vehicle fueling and maintenance occur. ❑ Areas with less than three (3) feet of separation distance from the bottom of the infiltration system to the elevation of the seasonally saturated soils or the top of bedrock. ❑ Areas where industrial facilities are not authorized to infiltrate industrial stormwater under an National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) /State Disposal System (SDS) Industrial Stormwater Permit issued by the MPCA. ❑ Areas where high levels of contaminants in soil or groundwater will be mobilized by the infiltrating stormwater. ❑ Areas of predominately Hydrological Soil Group D (clay) soils unless allowed by a local unit of government with a current MS4 Permit. ❑ Areas within 1,000 feet up- gradient, or 100 feet down- gradient of active karst features unless allowed by a local unit of government with a current MS4 permit. ❑ Areas within a Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) as defined in Minn. R. 4720.5100, subp. 13., unless allowed by a local unit of government with a current MS4 Permit. ❑ Areas where soil infiltration rates are more than 8.3 inches per hour unless soils are amended to slow the infiltration rate below 8.3 inches per hour or as allowed by a local unit of government with a current MS4 Permit. Comments: Yes N/A ❑ ❑ Wet sedimentation basin: Yes N/A ❑ ❑ Permanent volume of 1800 feet below outlet pipe for each acre draining. ❑ ❑ Minimum depth of 3 feet; maximum depth of 10 feet. ❑ ❑ Configured so scour or resuspension is minimized. ❑ ❑ Water quality volume is one inch (or remainder of volume not reduced) of runoff from new impervious surfaces. ❑ ❑ Basin outlets designed to discharge at less than 5.66 cubic feet per second (cfs) per acre of pond. ❑ ❑ Basin outlets designed to prevent short circuiting. ❑ ❑ Basin outlets designed to prevent discharge of floatables. ❑ ❑ Stabilized emergency overflow. ❑ ❑ Is adequate maintenance access provided? ❑ ❑ Location is outsid.e of surface waters and any permanent natural buffers established under Appendix A.C.3 ❑ ❑ Designed to avoid draining water from wetlands (unless the impact to the wetland is in compliance with the requirements of Appendix A.D). Comments: Yes N/A ❑ ❑ Regional ponds: Comments: www.pca.state.mn.us wq- strm2 -47 • 4110114 Yes N/A ❑ ❑ Is written authorization from owner of regional pond included in SWPPP? ❑ ❑ Is there no significant degradation of waterways between project and regional pond? ❑ ❑ Does regional pond design conform to the permit requirements for wet sedimentation basin? Record Retention Requirements must be addresses in the SWPPP: ❑ ❑ The SWPPP including, all changes to it, and inspections and maintenance records must be kept at the site during construction by the Permittee(s) who has operational control of that portion of the site. 651- 296 -6300 • 800 - 657 -3864 TTY 651- 282 -5332 or 800 - 657 -3864 • Available in alternative formats Page 4 of Part IV - Construction Activity Requirements Yes N/A ❑ ❑ Addresses erosion prevention measures: Yes NIA ® ❑ Areas delineated on plans that are not to be disturbed or are areas where disturbance will be minimized. ® ❑ Areas of steep slopes will minimize disturbance or other techniques to minimize destabilization of steep slopes. ® ❑ Has appropriate construction phasing been implemented? ® ❑ Do exposed soils have erosion protection /cover initiated immediately and finished within 14 days (or 7 days Appendix A)? ❑ ® For DNR Public waters with "work in water restrictions" during specified fish spawning time frames, all exposed soil areas that are adjacent to and drain to these waters must complete the stabilization activities within 24 hours during the restriction period. ® ❑ Design includes stormwater conveyance channels to route water around unstabilized areas on the site and to reduce erosion, unless infeasible? ❑ ® Are wetted perimeters of ditches stabilized within 200 feet of surface water within 24 hours? ❑ ® Temporary or permanent ditches or swales that are being used as a sediment containment system during construction must be stabilized within 24 hours after no longer being used as a sediment containment system. ❑ ❑ Do pipe outlets have energy dissipation within 24 hours of connecting? ® ❑ Discharges from stormwater controls are directed to vegetated areas of the site (including any natural buffers) unless infeasible. The SWPPP lacks information regarding stabilization of pipe outlets with energy dissipation within 24 hours of a Comments: connection. Update SWPPP language to address eneWdiss; ation requirements at pipe outlets. Yes N/A ❑ ❑ Addresses sediment control measures: Yes N/A ® ❑ Are sediment control practices established on down gradient perimeters and upgradient of any buffer The SWPPP lacks information regarding protecting inlets and management of stockpiles. Update SWPPP Comments: ianquaae to address these Permit requirements. Yes N/A ® Addresses dewatering and basin draining: Yes NIA ® ❑ Is there a plan in place for dewatering to prevent nuisance conditions, erosion, or inundation of wetlands? ❑ ® If using filters with backwash water, either haul the backwash water away for disposal, return the backwash water to the beginning of the treatment process, or incorporate the backwash water into the site in a manner that does not erode into runoff. Comments: Yes N/A ® ❑ Addresses inspections and maintenance: www.pca.state.mn.us • 651 -296 -6300 • 800- 657 -3864 TTY 651- 282 -5332 or 800- 657 -3864 Available in alternative formats wq- strm2 -47 • 4110114 Page 5 of 7 zones? ❑ ❑ Are all inlets protected? ❑ ❑ Do stockpiles have sediment control and directed to be placed in areas away from surface waters or natural buffers? ® ❑ Do construction site entrances minimize street tracking? ® ❑ Plans to minimize soil compaction and, unless infeasible to preserve topsoil. ❑ ® 50 foot natural buffers preserved or (if not feasible) provide redundant sediment controls when a surface water is located within 50 feet of the project's earth disturbances and drains to the surface water. The SWPPP lacks information regarding protecting inlets and management of stockpiles. Update SWPPP Comments: ianquaae to address these Permit requirements. Yes N/A ® Addresses dewatering and basin draining: Yes NIA ® ❑ Is there a plan in place for dewatering to prevent nuisance conditions, erosion, or inundation of wetlands? ❑ ® If using filters with backwash water, either haul the backwash water away for disposal, return the backwash water to the beginning of the treatment process, or incorporate the backwash water into the site in a manner that does not erode into runoff. Comments: Yes N/A ® ❑ Addresses inspections and maintenance: www.pca.state.mn.us • 651 -296 -6300 • 800- 657 -3864 TTY 651- 282 -5332 or 800- 657 -3864 Available in alternative formats wq- strm2 -47 • 4110114 Page 5 of 7 Yes NIA ® ❑ Identifies the person who will oversee the BMP inspection and maintenance? ® ❑ Inspections performed once every 7 days. ® ❑ Inspections performed within 24 hours of a rain event greater than 0.5 in /24 hours. ® ❑ Inspection and Maintenance records include: Yes N/A ❑ ❑ Date and time of inspection. ❑ ❑ Name of person(s) conducting inspections. ❑ ❑ Finding of inspections, including the specific location where corrective actions are needed. ❑ ❑ Corrective actions taken (including dates, times, and party completing maintenance activities). ❑ ❑ Date and amount of rainfall events greater than 0.5 in /24 hours. ❑ ❑ Rainfall amounts must be obtained by a properly maintained rain gauge installed onsite, or by a weather station that is within one mile or by a weather reporting system. ❑ ❑ Requirements to observe, describe, and photograph any discharge that may be occurring during the inspection. Yes NIA ❑ ❑ Maintenance performed Yes N/A ❑ ❑ All discovered nonfunctional BMPs must be repaired, replaced, or supplemented with functional BMPs within 24 hours after discovery, or as soon as field conditions allow. ® ❑ Silt fence repaired /replaced /supplemented when nonfunctional, or one -half full; within 24 hours. ❑ ❑ Sediment basins drained and sediment removed when reaches one -half storage volume; within 72 hours. ❑ ❑ Sediment removed from surface waters within seven days. ® ❑ Construction site exits inspected, tracked sediment removed within 24 hours. ® ❑ All infiltration areas must be inspected for sediment from ongoing construction activity and that equipment is not being driven across the infiltration area. Information provided on Page 5 of the SW PPP, Part 7.2, 7 -9. conflicts with NPDES Construction General Permit Comments: BMP maintenance requirements. Amend lanquage to reflect NPDES permit requirements. _ Yes N/A ❑ ❑ Addresses pollution prevention management measures: Yes N/A • ❑ Storage, handling, and disposal of construction products, materials, and wastes. • ❑ Fueling and maintenance of equipment or vehicles; spill prevention and response. ® ❑ Vehicle and equipment washing. ® ❑ No engine degreasing allowed on site. ❑ ❑ Containment of Concrete and other washout waste. ❑ ❑ Portable toilets are positioned so that they are secure. The SW PPP lacks details regarding containment of concrete and other washout toilets so that they are upright and secure. Update the SW PPP to address mans Comments: washout wastes, and proper positioning of portable toilets to meet NPDES perm Yes N/A ❑ ❑ Addresses final stabilization: ), and positioning portable of concrete and other Yes N/A ® ❑ Stabilization by uniform perennial vegetative cover (70% density of its expected final growth). ❑ ❑ The permanent stormwater management system is constructed, meets all requirements, and is operating. ❑ ® Drainage ditches stabilized. ® ❑ All temporary synthetic and structural BMPs removed. ® ❑ Clean out sediment from conveyances and sedimentation basins (return to design capacity). ❑ ® If residential — temporary erosion protection and down gradient perimeter control has been completed and distribute homeowner factsheet. ❑ ❑ Submit Notice of Termination (NOT) to the MPCA. www.pca.state.mn.us 651- 296 -6300 800- 657 -3864 TTY 651- 282 -5332 or 800 - 657 -3864 • Available in alternative formats wq- strm2 -47 • 4110114 Page 6 of 7 The SWPPP lacks information on final stabilization, including details regarding the permanent stormwater management system and submittal of the NOT to the MPCA. Update the SWPPP to address management of the Comments: _permanent stormwater system and submittal of the NOT to the MPCA at project completion. Requirements of Appendix A Yes N/A ❑ ❑ Does this site drain to a discharge point on the project that is within one mile of a Special or Impaired Water? Yes NIA Which type of special water? BMP category ❑ ❑ Wilderness Areas C.1, C.2, C.3 El_._ ❑ _ Mississippi River 1 C.1, C.2, C.3 ❑ El Scenic or Recreational river C.1, C.2, C.3 ❑ ❑ Lake Superior C.1, C.2, C.3 ❑ ❑ _ Lake Trout Lakes C.1, C_2, C.3 0_ ❑ Trout Lakes_ C,1, C.2, C.3 _El ❑ Scientific and Natural areas C.1, C.2, C.3 ❑ ❑ Trout Streams C.1, C.2, C.3,CA ❑ ❑ Calcareous fens C.1, C.2 Yes N/A Impaired water BMP category ❑ ❑ TMDL and /or WLA notyet approved C.1, C.2 ❑ ❑ Approved TMDL and WLA BMPs in TMDL TMDL = Total Maximum Daily Loads WLA = Waste Load Al locations BMP category Requirement Yes N/A ❑ ❑ C.1 Stabilization initiated immediately and all soils protected in seven days /provide temp basin for five acres draining to common location. ❑ ❑ C.2 Treat water quality volume of one inch of runoff by retaining on site unless not feasible due to site conditions (See Part III.D.1. design requirements). ❑ ❑ C.3 Maintain buffer zone of 100 linear feet from Special Water. ❑ ❑ CA Temperature controls. Comments: ❑ ❑ Does this site have a discharge with the potential for adverse impact to wetlands: Yes NIA ❑ ❑ Has the wetland mitigation sequence (avoid, minimize, mitigate) been followed /satisfied by? ❑ Impact activity is permitted by either the Wetlands Conservation Act, DNR, or U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. ❑ Compliance with 7050.0186 is documented to the MPCA and approved. The SWPPP lacks information regarding whether or not the project is within one mile of and discharges to an impaired or special waterbody. Update the SW PPP to clarify whether or not Appendix A requirements apply to this Comments: project. www.pca.state.mn.us 651.296 -6300 • 800- 657 -3864 TTY 651- 282 -5332 or 800- 657 -3864 • Available in alternative formats wq- strm2 -47 • 4110114 Page 7 of 7 (reserved for recording information) STORMWATER FACILITIES MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 20, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City "), and , a Minnesota limited liability company ( "Owner" 1. BACKGROUND. Owner is the fee owner of certain property located within the City of Monticello, County of Wright, State of Minnesota legally described as follows: Parcel ID No. Lot X, Block X, (Abstract /Torrens Property) according to the recorded plat thereof. having a street address of , Monticello, MN 55362 ( "Subject Property"). Owner is intending to construct certain private stormwater facilities on the subject property as shown on the attached Exhibit "A ". This agreement is in accordance with the City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 4: Finishing Standards; Section 4.10 Grading, Drainage, Stormwater Management and Erosion Control; Maintenance of Private Stormwater Management Facilities. 2. MAINTENANCE. The Owner shall inspect, maintain, operate and replace in a good state of repair and safe condition all stormwater facilities, including, without limitation, drainage swales, 1 storm sewer systems, infiltration basins, sedimentation basins and ponding systems on the subject property to ensure that the stormwater facilities ( "Facilities ") function as intended. Now, therefore, it is mutually agreed by and between all parties: A. Owner, at its expense, shall be responsible for the inspection and maintenance of the Facilities so that the Facilities function properly. Owner shall submit a report to the City, upon request, that includes the inspection date(s) of the Facilities, conditions of the Facilities, testing of the Facilities and any corrective actions taken. B. Owner shall inspect the Facilities at least annually. C. The following operational maintenance activities shall be performed on all Facilities on a regular basis or as needed: 1. Removal of trash and debris, 2. Inspection of inlets and outlets, 3. Removal of sediments when the storage volume or conveyance capacity of the stormwater management system is below design levels 4. Ensure systems designed for infiltration are drawing down within 48 hours, infiltration testing is performed as identified in the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Stormwater Manual and 5. Stabilization and restoration of eroded areas. D. If the Facilities are not functioning as designed and permitted, operational maintenance must be performed immediately to restore the system. If operational maintenance measures are insufficient to enable the system to meet the design and performance standards of this chapter, the permittee must either replace the system or construct an alternative design. E. In the event the Owner fails to maintain the Facilities in good working condition acceptable to the City, the City may enter upon the Property and take such steps as are necessary to correct deficiencies identified in the inspection report and to charge the costs of such repairs to the Owner. This provision shall not be construed to allow the City to erect any structure of permanent nature on the land of the Owner for the stormwater facilities. It is expressly understood and agreed that the City is under no obligation to routinely maintain or repair said facilities, and in no event shall this Agreement be construed to impose any such obligation on the City. The Owner grants to the City, its authorized agents and employees, a non - exclusive, perpetual easement over, across, under and through the Property for such purposes. 2 This maintenance agreement is a personal obligation of Owner and shall be binding upon the executors, administrators, successors, heirs and assigns of Owner. 3. RECORDING. This Agreement shall be recorded against the title to the subject property and shall be binding upon Owner, its /their assigns, heirs and successors in interest. CITY OF MONTICELLO (SEAL) FROND] STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20, by Brian Stumpf and by Jeff O'Neill, respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20, by THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452 -5000 SRN:ms NOTARY PUBLIC 2 EXHIBIT "A" SKETCH DEPICTING STORMWATER FACILITIES (reserved for recording information) DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT and CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (Developer Installed Improvements) M0 AN M CAMPING WORLD FIRST ADDITION THIS DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT( "Agreement ") is dated A�r , 20, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City "), and FRHP LINCOLNSHIRE, LLC, a liability company (the "Owner" and "Developer "). limited 1. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL. On November 14th, 2016 the City approved a conditional use permit for the development of a retail building and recreational vehicle center, including auto repair, and the request for a zoning map amendment to consolidate the zoning designation on the two subject parcels to a B -3 District. Developer seeks final plat approval for CAMPING WORLD FIRST ADDITION (referred to in this Contract as the "Plat' or "Development ") creating a single lot and block. The land is situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, and is legally described as set forth on Exhibit A hereto ( "Subject Property") 1 189840vl A. The City's approval of the Plat is conditioned upon the Developer entering into this Agreement, furnishing the security required by this Agreement, recording of the Plat and this Agreement with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within one hundred (100) days after the City Council approved the development, and subject to compliance with the conditions identified in Resolution #2016 - XXX B. The City granted approval to the conditional use permit for development (identified as Plans A through J in paragraph 9 of this Agreement); as adopted on November 14th, 2016 by Resolution #2016 - XXX, subject to compliance with the terms and conditio this Agreement and all other City requirements which are in effect. C. The City granted approval to the rezoning of the parcels within the plat as adopted on November 14th, 2016 by Resolution #2016 -XXX, subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all other City requirements which are in effect. 3. RIGHT TO PROCEED. Within the Subject Property, the Developer may not remove trees, construct public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this Agreement has been fully executed by both parties and fled with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security as described in this Agreement has been received by the City, and 3) the Plat and this Agreement have been recorded with the Wright County Recorder's/Registrar's Office within one hundred (100) days of City Council approval, and 4) the City's Administrator has issued a letter that the Developer may proceed based on completion of the conditions and requirements of this Agreement. If the Plat or this Agreement is not recorded within one hundred (100) days of City Council approval, the approval shall be considered void, unless a request for time extension is submitted in writing and approved by the City Council prior to expiration of the one hundred (100) day period. The City shall submit this Agreement for recording promptly upon execution by both parties. The Developer shall submit the Plat for recording to the Wright County Recorder/Registrar's Office. 189840v1 4. PHASED DEVELOPMENT. If this Plat or Agreement is a phase of a multi - phased development, the City may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent phases if the Developer has breached this Agreement and the breach has not been remedied. Development of subsequent phases may not proceed until the City approves Development Agreements for those phases. 5. PRELIMINARY PLAT STATUS. If this Plat is a phase of a multi - phased preliminary plat, and the preliminary plat approval for all phases not final platted shall lapse and be void unless final platted into lots and blocks, not outlots, within three (3) years after preliminary plat approval as specified by state law. 6. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS. For three (3) years from the date of this Agreement, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved final plat or approved development unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law, but subject to the limitations set forth in Minn Stat. Sec 462.358, subd. (c), the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Agreement with respect to property which did not receive final plat or development approval less than three (3) years prior to any such amendments. 7. DESIGN STANDARDS. The applicable Zoning District Regulations are equal to those set forth in the B -3, Highway Business, Zoning District Regulations and in accordance with the plans as identified in Section "8" of this Agreement. 8. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The Subject Property shall be developed in accordance with the plans listed below ( "Plans "). The Plans shall be as approved with conditions by the City of Monticello on November 14th2016. The Plans shall not be attached to this Agreement. The Plans may be prepared, subject to City approval, after entering the Agreement, but before commencement of any work or on the 189840v1 Subject Property. If the Plans vary from the written terms of this Agreement, the plans shall control. The Plans are: A. Preliminary Plat B. Final Plat C. Survey and Utility Plans D. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control E. Details F. SWPPP and Storm Water Management Plan G. Exterior Building Elevations H. Proposed Photometric I. Site and Landscaping Plan J. Sign Plan 10. IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall install and pay for the following as required to be built within the project as improvements in accordance with the Plans, as approved with conditions by the City of Monticello on November 14th, 2016: D. Parking Lots F. Concrete Curb and Gutte G. Street lights pm* L H. Site Grading, Ponding, and Erosion Control I. Landscaping J. Underground U ess m � K. Setting of Iron Monuments L. Surveying and Staking The improvements shall be installed in accordance with the City Code and the approved Plans. The Developer will not perform any heavy construction between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. The Developer shall submit plans and specifications for permit which have been prepared by a competent registered professional engineer to the City for approval by the City Engineer which approval shall be provided on the condition that such submittals comply with the Plans and this Agreement. The Developer shall instruct its engineer or a separate third -party consultant to provide adequate field inspection personnel to assure an acceptable level of quality control. The Developer shall provide for on -site project management via a Construction Superintendent. In addition, the Developer shall provide a Construction Project Manager and 4 189840v1 Development Construction Manager to oversee the Development and be responsible for design changes and contract administration between the Developer and the Developer's contractor. The Developer, or its engineer or General Contractor shall schedule a pre - construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City Council chambers with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. 11. IRON MONUMENTS. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.021 and Monticello City Code Section 11 -4 -2, the final placement of iron monuments for all lot corners must be completed before the applicable security for the iron monuments is released. The Developer's surveyor shall also submit a written notice to the City certifying that the in s have been installed. 12. PERMITS. The Developer shall obt equire its contractors and subcontractors to obtain all necessary permits, including but not limited to the following to the extent required: Wright County for County Road Access and Work in County Rights -of -Way MnDot for State Highway Access Minnesota Department of Health for Water mains MPCA for Storm Water Permits, Sanitary Sewer and Hazardous Material Removal and Disposal • DNR for Dewatering mw • City of Monticello for Grading, Excavation and Building Permits • NPDES /SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit 13. DEWATERING. Due to the variable nature of groundwater levels and storm water flows, it will be the Developer's and the Developer's contractors and subcontractors responsibility to satisfy themselves with regard to the elevation of groundwater in the area and the level of effort needed to perform dewatering and storm flow routing operations. All dewatering shall be in accordance with all applicable county, state, and federal rules and regulations. DNR regulations regarding appropriations permits shall also be strictly followed. 14. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Subject Property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with Plat development. 189840v1 15. EROSION CONTROL AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT. A. Prior to initiating site grading, the erosion control plan shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if reasonably required. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded within seven (7) days after the completion of the work, weather permitting, or in an area that is inactive for more than seven (7) days, or as identified in the Construction Stormwater General Permit/SWPPP, unless authorized and approved by the City Engineer, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be in accordance with the urrent seeding specification which may include certified oat seed to provide a temporary ground cover a ly as possible. All seeded areas shall be maintained as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may provide Developer with written notice of default. If the Developer does not cure the default within two (2) days after receipt of such notice, then the City will take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City reasonably incurred for such work within thirty (30) days after receipt of the City's written request (which request shall include all supporting and related evidence necessary to substantiate the actual cost), the City may draw down the letter of credit to pay any reasonable and actual costs. No development, street or utility construction will be allowed unless the Plat is in full compliance with the approved erosion control plan. B. The Developer shall inspect, maintain, operate and replace in a good state of repair and safe condition all proposed drainage improvements, including, without limitation, the private storm sewer and infiltration systems on the Subject Property. 6 189840v1 16. GRADING PLAN. The Subject Property shall be graded in accordance with the approved grading development and erosion control plan. The Plan shall conform to City of Monticello General Specifications. The Developer shall provide the City with an "as constructed" grading plan certified by a registered land surveyor or engineer that all ponds, swales, and ditches for public drainage have been constructed on public easements or land owned by the Developer. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City may issue building permits to the Developer, prior to completion of all grading, provided the City Engineer has determined that adequate erosion control measures are in place. The "as constructed" plan shall include field verified elevations of the following: a) cross sections of ponds; b) location and elevations along all swales, wetlands, wetland mitigation areas if any, ditches, locations and dimensions of borrow areas /stockpiles, and installed "conservation area" posts; and c) lot corner elevations. The City will withhold issuance of certificate of occupancy until the approved certified grading plan is on file with the City and all erosion control measures are in place as approved and applicable. M 17. CLEAN UP. DurN course &ing and construction on the Subject Pro ell the Developer shall clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, subcontractors, their agents or assigns. Prior to any construction in the Plat, the Developer shall identify in writing a responsible parry and schedule for erosion control, street cleaning, and street sweeping. The Developer shall pay a penalty of $100.00 a day for each calendar day that the adjacent streets are not cleaned in accordance with this paragraph. If the Developer repeatedly fails to clean adjacent streets in accordance with this paragraph, the City may, in its discretion, after 24 hours' notice to the Developer, perform the work or contract to have the work completed and bill the reasonable and actual costs to the Developer. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within thirty (30) days from the date notice of the amount owed to the City is mailed, the City may draw down the Irrevocable Letter of Credit for grading to pay any 189840v1 such costs. No development, utility or street construction will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the Subject Property is in full compliance with the requirements of this Paragraph. 18. CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. A. The Developer shall pay a fee for the City's engineering administration as related to grading and restoration of the Subject Property. City engineering administration will include monitoring of construction observation related to grading and restoration of the site, consultation with Developer and his engineer on status or problems regarding the project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, and processing of requests for reduction in security. Fees for this service shall be at standard hourly rates per the City's adopted fee schedule estimated to be three percent (3.0 %), of the estimated construction cost of the W", Subject Property grading and restoration cost, assuming normal construction and project scheduling. Developer will provide an $2000.00 escrow, which is separate and in addition to any other escrow funds for this Development. r, B. The fees owed by the Developer to the City under this Section 21 shall be paid from the escrows amounts. Any amounts not utilized from the escrow account shall be returned to the Developer when all the Development has been completed in accordance with this Agreement. If additional escrow amounts are required for such costs incurred beyond the escrow deposit, the Developer shall be billed directly for such costs and there shall be no issuance of occupancy permits until all such obligations have been fully paid. 19. CITY PLANNING, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATION. A. The Developer shall submit an escrow deposit for fees for City administration relating to processing of the Plat and associated administration, including staff and consulting legal, planning and administration costs. Fees for this service shall be at standard hourly rates per the City's adopted fee schedule estimated at $6,000 minimum. Developer will provide a $6,000.00 escrow, which is separate and 189840v1 in addition to any other escrow funds for this Development. This amount is subject to reconciliation based on actual costs at the completion of the project. D. The fees owed by the Developer to the City under this Section shall be paid from the escrows amounts. Any amounts not utilized from the escrow account shall be returned to the Developer when all the Development has been completed in accordance with this Agreement. If additional escrow amounts are required for such costs incurred beyond the escrow deposit, the Developer shall be billed directly for such costs and there shall be no issuance of occupancy permits until all such obligations have been fully paid. 20. CLAIMS. In the event that the City receives claims from labor, material, or others that work required by this Agreement has been performed, the sums due them have not been paid, and the 4W mmi ICI laborers, material, or others are seeking payment from the City, and the Developer has failed to resolve claims (including by dismissal, payment or bonding over the claim) within 30 days' notice from the City, the Developer hereby authorizes the City to commence an Interpleader action pursuant to Rule 22, Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts, to draw upon the letters of credit in an amount up to 125 percent of the claim(s) and deposit the funds in compliance with the Rule, and upon such deposit, the Developer shall release, discharge, and dismiss the City from any further proceedings as it pertains to the letters of credit deposited with the District Court, except that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine attorneys' fees pursuant to this Agreement. 21. SANITARY SEWER TRUNK CHARGE. The Development is subject to a charge for Sanitary Sewer Trunk expenses in the amount of $6,104.44, which includes all platted lots within the Development, payable at the time of final Plat approval. The fee is calculated as follows: $3,316.00 /gross acre x 1.84 gross acres = $6,104.44 22. WATER TRUNK CHARGE. The Development is subject to a charge for Water Trunk expenses in the amount of $4,511.68, which includes all platted lots within the Development, payable at the time of final Plat approval. The fee is calculated as follows: 189840v1 $2,452.00 /gross acre x 1.84 gross acres = $ 4,511.68 23. STORM SEWER CHARGE. The Development is subject to a charge for Storm Sewer expenses in the amount of $16,987.40, which includes all platted lots within the Development, payable at the time of final Plat approval. The fee is calculated as follows: Base: $3,543.00 /net acre x 1.57 net acres = $5,562.51 Alternate Ponding Area: $7,277.00/net acre x 1.57 net acres= $11,424.89 TOTAL: $= 16,987.40 24. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. There are currently no special assessments assigned to the lots within the plat. 101kL A 25. 26. development: PARK DEDICATION. Park dedication is not applicable to the Deve: SPECIAL PROVISIONS. The following special provisions shall appl, A. Implementation of the recommendations listed in Resolution #2016 -OXX, Resolution #2016 -OXX and Resolution 2016 -OXX, of November 14th, 2016 B. The Developer shall post a $300.00 security for the final placement of interior subdivision iron monuments at property corners and the placement of all monuments. The security will be held by the City until the Developer's land surveyor certifies that all irons have been set following site grading and utility and street construction. C. The Developer shall pay the cost for the preparation of record construction drawings and City base map upgrading by the City Engineer as part of the Administrative / Engineering Fee. D. The Developer is required to submit the final Plat in electronic format. The electronic format shall be Auto CAD file. E. The Developer must obtain a sign permit from the City prior to installation of any signs for the development. 27. SUMMARY OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. 10 189840v1 A. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement, payment of the costs of all improvements, and construction of all public and private improvements, prior to release of the Plat for recording, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit, in the form attached hereto, from a bank ( "Security ") for $XX,XXX.00 to guarantee completion of the landscaping and lot monuments. B. The Developer shall also furnish the City with a Security for $5,520.00 for grading in compliance with approved Plan "H ". This amount was calculated as follows. $3,000 /acre X 1.84 acres = $5,520.00 GRADING/EROSION SECURITY: Erosion Control /Grading Certification 1 $ 5,520.00 C. The amount of the security includes all of the security requirements set forth in the preceding sections of this Agreement, and was calculated as follows: lmwr CONSTRUCTION COSTS: Site Landscaping provide estimated landscaping costs X 125% SUB -TOTAL 14 OTHER COSTS: Site Grading Lot Corners /Iron Monuments OTHER COSTS SUB -TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $Developer to $ 5,520.00 300.00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION SECURITY $ D. This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. The bank shall be subject to the approval of the City Administrator, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. The security shall be for an automatically renewing term. Individual security instruments may be for shorter terms provided they are replaced at least thirty (30) days prior to their expiration. The City may draw down the security, upon five (5) business days' prior written notice to Developer, for any violation of the terms of this Agreement. Amounts drawn shall not exceed the amounts 11 189840v1 necessary to cure to the default. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City that work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied in accordance with the Plans, the security shall be reduced from time to time by ninety percent (90 %) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10 %) of the amounts certified by the Developer's engineer shall be retained as security until all improvements have been completed and all financial obligations to the City satisfied. The City standard specifications for utilities and street construction outline procedures for security reductions. 28. SUMMARY OF CASH REQUIREMENTS. The following is a summary of the cash requirements under this Agreement which must be furni to the City prior to release of the Plat for recording and execution of this Agreement by the City ® V_ ' Mk City Engineering Expenses, escrow 3% Grading & Restoration $ 2,000.00 City Administration Expenses, escrow $ 6,000.00 Administration, Legal, Planning Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge $6,101.44 Water Trunk Charge $4,511.68 Storm Sewer Charge (Base) $5,562.51 Storm Sewer Trunk (Alternate) $11,424.89 Total Cash Requirements $35,600.52 29. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all reasonable and customary costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the Plat, including but not limited to Soil and Water Conservation District charges, legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the Plat, the preparation of this Agreement, review of construction plans and documents, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the Plat. 12 189840v1 B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for reasonable costs incurred in the enforcement of this Agreement, including engineering and attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall pay, or cause to be paid when due, and in any event before any penalty is attached, all special assessments referred to in this Agreement. This is an obligation of the Developer and shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire plat or property, or any part of it. D. If there are insufficient escrow funds on hand, the City will bill the Developer for its costs. The Developer shall pay in full all such bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt Plat development and construction until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall 0 accrue interest at the rate of eight percent (8 %) per year. ■ E. In addition to the charges herein and special assessments referred to herein, other charges as required by City ordinance may be imposed such as, but not limited to, sewer access charges, water access charges, and building permit fees. 30. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, with the exclusion of the proposed building structures, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any reasonable and actual expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than forty -eight (48) hours in advance. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part to the Subject Property. 31. MISCELLANEOUS. A. The Developer represents to the City that the Plat complies with all city, county, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to, subdivision ordinances, zoning 13 189840v1 ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the Plat does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the Plat until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. B. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer is well seized in fee title of the Subject Property being final platted and/or has obtained consents to this Agreement, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the Subject Property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the Subject Property being final platted; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. Any transfer of an ownership interest in the Subject Property is an assignment of the rights and obligations herein to the subsequent owner C. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City or Developer under this Agreement. D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. E. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. F. Developer will hold the City and its officers, agents, and employees harmless from claims made by third parties, including but not limited to other property owners, tenants, contractors, subcontractors, and materialmen, for damages sustained, costs incurred, or injuries resulting from the Developer's negligent, reckless or willful misconduct. The Developer will indemnify the City and its officers, agents, and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses, including reasonable 14 189840v1 engineering and attorney's fees, which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, except if caused by City negligence, reckless or willful misconduct. G. In addition to all legal or equitable remedies, breach of any material term of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties, and Certificates of Occupancy. H. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. & Is F I. Developer shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) months after the City has accepted the development, commercial general liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its contractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. The insurance may be provided by a single policy or multiple policies including excess of or umbrella policies and shall have limits for bodily injury and death not less than $1,000,000 for one person and $2,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $1,000,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $2,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policies, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City releasing the Plat for recording or issuing any permits. In the event the City has not received this prior to the start of construction, the Developer shall halt all work until a certificate has been provided to the City. The City shall be listed as an additional insured on all policies. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. 15 189840v1 Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. K. The Developer will pay in full all invoices submitted to it by the City within sixty (60) days after receipt which reasonably evidence those costs incurred in the drafting, enforcement and supervision of this Agreement, including reasonable engineering, planning, and attorney's fees. If the invoices are not paid on time, the City may halt all development work until the invoices are paid in full. Invoices not paid within sixty (60) days shall be subject to an eight percent (8 %) per annum interest charge. 1 L Developer shall be respo le for all snow removal from sidewalks and trails on developed and vacant lots and outlots to the extent that City Ordinance requires snow removal from the Subject Property. Developer shall be responsible for ensuring that all vacant lots comply with the City's Code regarding nuisances. 32. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the written permission of the City Council, which permission shall not be unreasonably withheld. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respected successors and assigns, including without limitation, any and all future and present owners, tenants, occupants, licensee, mortgagee and any other parties with any interest in the Subject Property. Should the Developer convey any lot or lots in the Plat to a third party, the City and the owner of that lot or those lots may amend the Development or this Agreement, with City approval, or use of those lots without the approval or consent of the other lot owners within the Plat. Private agreements between the owners of lots within the Plat for shared service or access and related matters necessary for the efficient use of the 16 189840v1 Subject Property shall be the responsibility of the lot owners and shall not bind or restrict City authority to approve applications from any lot owner. 33. COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one instrument. 34. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Administrator, or mailed to the City by certified mail, or by a nationally recognized overnight carrier, such as FedEx or UPS, in care of the City Administrator at the following address: City of Monticello, Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1, Monticello, Minnesota 55362, with a copy to the City Attorney via regular mail at: Campbell Knutson, P.A., Grand Oak Office Center I, 860 Blue Gentian Road, #290, Eagan, Minnesota 55121 [Signatures on the following pages.] 17 189840vl (SEAL) Signature page to Development Contract and PUD Agreement CAMPING WORLD FIRST ADDITION Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator no%b STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by Brian Stumpf and by Jeff O'Neill, the Mayor and City of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public 18 189840v1 DEVELOPER: FRHP LINCOLNSHIRE, LLC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) Its [print name] The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by the of FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452 -5000 JJJ ary Public 19 189840v1 EXHIBIT "A" TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT Legal Description 189840v1 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT TO: City of Monticello Dear Sir or Madam: No. _ Date: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $ , available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. dated 2 , of (Name of Bank; b) Be accompanied by an affidavit signed by the Mayor or City Administrator of the City of Monticello certifying that is in default of the Development Contract with the City of Monticello and that five (5) business days prior written notice has been given by the City to the Developer with respect to the existence of such default, and such default has not been cured. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) , on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2 This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one -year terms unless, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Monticello City Administrator that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty -five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Monticello City Administrator, 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1, Monticello, MN 55362, and is actually received by the City Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. 189840v1 Its CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE LIABILITY & WORKERS' COMPENSATION This certificate is issued as a matter of information only and confers no rights upon the certificate holder. This certificate does not amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed below. PROJECT: CERTIFICATE HOLDER & ADDITIONAL INSURED: City of Monticello ADDRESS: ARCH/ENGR: INSURED: ADDRESS: AGENT: ADDRESS: WORKERS' COMPENSATION COVERAGE POLICY # EFFECTIVE DATE INSURANCE COMPANY: COVERAGE- Workers' Compensation, Statutory. Employers' Liability Limit $ Each Accident $ Disease Policy Limit $ ($500,000 Policy limit applies to both accident and disease) GENERAL LIABILITY EXPIRATION DATE Disease Employee Limit POLICY # EFFECTIVE DATE / / EXPIRATION DATE INSURANCE COMPANY: ( )Claims Made ( )Occurrence ( )Owner's & Contractors Protective LIMITS: General Aggregate Limit (Other Than Products - Completed Operations) $ _ Products - Completed Operations Aggregate Limit $ Personal & Advertising Injury Limit $ Each Occurrence $ 189840v1 ( ) Other COVERAGE PROVIDED Operations of Contractor: Yes Operations of Sub - Contractor (Contingent): Yes, Does Personal Injury Include Property Damage Liability Includes Claims Related to Employment: Yes Completed Operations/Products: Yes, Contractual Liability (Broad Form): Yes EXCEPTIONS: Damage Due to Collapse No Government Immunity is Waived Yes No No Property Damage Liability Includes Damage Due to Blasting Yes No No Damage Due to Collapse Yes No No Damage To Underground Facilities Yes No No Broad Form Property Damage Yes No. AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY POLICY # EFFECTIVE DATE: / / EXPIRATION DATE: INSURANCE COMPANY: ( )Any Auto ( )All Owned Autos ( )Hired Autos ( )Non -Owned Autos LIMITS: Bodily Injury $ Each Person / $ Each Occurrence OR Combined Single Limit $ Property Damage $ Each Occurrence ( )Scheduled Autos UMBRELLA EXCESS LIABILITY POLICY # EFFECTIVE DATE: / / EXPIRATION DATE: INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITS: Single Limit Bodily Injury and Property Damage Each Occurrence $ Aggregate COVERAGE PROVIDED: Applies in excess of the coverages listed above for Employers' Liability, General Liability, and Automobile Liability: Yes No Are any deductibles applicable to bodily injury or property damage on any of the above coverages? Yes No If So, List Amount $ AGENT CARRIES ERRORS AND OMISSIONS INSURANCE: Yes No Should any of the above described policies be cancelled before the expiration date thereof, the issuing company will mail 30 days' notice to the parties to whom this certificate is issued. Dated at: MN License # Authorized Insurance Representative 189840v1 On: M. MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (CAMPING WORLD FIRST ADDITION) FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ELK RIVER, a national banking association, which holds mortgages on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, agrees that the Development Contract shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgages. Dated this day of , 20_ STATE OF COUNTY OF FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ELK RIVER By: Its And: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this by and and River, a national banking association, on behalf of the bank. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452 -5000 JJJ 189840v1 [print name] [print name] day of , 20 , the of First national Bank of Elk Its )ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this by and and River, a national banking association, on behalf of the bank. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452 -5000 JJJ 189840v1 [print name] [print name] day of , 20 , the of First national Bank of Elk MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (CAMPING WORLD FIRST ADDITION) SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, a , which holds a mortgage on the Subject Property, which mortgage was originally in favor of Central Minnesota Development Company, a Minnesota non - profit corporation, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, agrees that the Development Contract shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgages. Dated this day of 120. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION STATE OF COUNTY OF by By: Its And: Its )ss. [print name] [print name] The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 120 and the and Administration, a DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452 -5000 JJJ 189840v1 on its behalf. Notary Public of Small Business (reserved for recording information) ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 20 , by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City"), and ( "Owner ") 1. BACKGROUND. Owner is the fee owner of certain property located within the City of Monticello, County of Wright, State of Minnesota legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, Camping World First Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof. (Abstract Property) having a street address of 3801 West Chelsea Road, Monticello, MN 55362 ( "subject property "). The City owns easements for drainage and utility purposes over portions of the subject property as shown on the attached Exhibit "A ". The developed improvements include a paved parking lot and access drive aisles on the subject property which encroach into the City's easement areas as depicted on the attached Exhibit "B ". 2. ENCROACHMENT AUTHORIZATION. The City hereby approves the encroachment in its easement areas for the construction, use, and maintenance of the proposed paved parking lot and access drive aisles as depicted on the attached Exhibit `B ". 156955v01 1 (Abstract /Torrens Property) SRN:r03 /31/2011 3. MAINTENANCE. Owner shall be responsible for all costs relating to construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and repair, including snow removal, with respect to the paved parking lot and drive aisles. This maintenance agreement is a personal obligation of Owner and shall be binding upon the executors, administrators, successors, heirs and assigns of Owner. 4. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNITY. In consideration of being allowed to encroach in the City's easement areas, Owner, its /their successors, heirs and assigns, hereby agree(s) to indemnify and hold the City harmless from all costs and expenses, claims and liability, including attorney's fees, relating to or arising out of this grant to Owner of permission to encroach in the City's easement areas for the construction, reconstruction, maintenance, use, operation, and the like of the paved parking lot and access drive aisles. 5. TERMINATION. If the City determines that the parking lot or access drive aisles interfere with the use, maintenance or repair of the City's utilities within the easement areas, Owner upon request by the City shall remove and replace the interference at its /their sole expense. If Owner fails to remove the interference in the timeframe required by the City, the City may remove the parking lot and/or drive aisles and shall have no obligation for damages to, or repair or replacement of the parking lot or drive aisles removed by the City. Further, the Owner consents to the City levying an assessment against the subject property for the City's costs. If Owner fails to maintain the parking lot or fails to remove and replace any interference as provided in this paragraph, the City may, at its sole discretion, terminate this Agreement by giving the current owner of the subject property thirty (30) days advance written notice, except that no notice period will be required in the case of an emergency condition as determined solely by the City and the Agreement may then be terminated immediately. 156955v01 2 (Abstract /Torrens Property) SRN:r03 /31/2011 The City may unilaterally terminate this Agreement if the parking lot or drive aisles interfere with any maintenance or improvements within the City's easement areas as determined by the City. 6. RECORDING. This Agreement shall be recorded against the title to the subject property and shall be binding upon Owner, its /their assigns, heirs and successors in interest. (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA ( ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT CITY OF MONTICELLO :• O Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20, by Brian Stumpfand by Jeff O'Neill, respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC 156955v01 3 (Abstract /Torrens Property) SRN:r03 /31/2011 PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by NOTARY PUBLIC THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452 -5000 SRN:ms 156955v01 4 (Abstract /Torrens Property) SRN:r03 /31/2011 EXHIBIT "A" SKETCH OF CITY DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS fJ � l T I 4TH e UW 1 i Yr ^T�srrT 1 r { VICLIIITY 3LkP ----L4 -- -_ e- -.— — 4�' sEl/I of IT SEr.10�T.1E1, R.25 .y ^a' � gam, le ,��e ` •� hY rr. / r fe � �r */ flu err .�kl i rl r ri 1 'T I RE L I ar..wauurV r / r/ 1? aq `MClllw ppin f"nar# 5a�e. �iminwl° ----L4 -- -_ e- -.— — 4�' 9 LOT�yI! 1 .y ^a' � III ,��e ` •� kris %• AA all EL Ili siR U y i � 'd,9 h WHIT If1Al "�+ PIj "vv r "pN� ��T4 apf4r�� r f I v t V� �- .A nnIT IF+AI �1--41J L.'I I Ivl v �I� a "7 1 I i I I _ I �J I yy I � F� yyt� L� �C ` h r,r., 1T 1," NI t nvL�I I 1,�l v r 4 f.'7 N t ea 5n i2u � w �T Al�tiers 156955v01 5 (Abstract /Torrens Property) SRN:r03 /31/2011 EXHIBIT `B" SKETCH DEPICTING PARKING LOT AND ACCESS DRIVE AISLE ENCROACHMENTS r E -M 11 _aF— PIN MMi IHI I IFFI—= 156955v01 SRN:r03 /31/2011 7 u a A wm t " r F 1 (Abstract /Torrens Property) City Council Agenda: 11/14/16 4B. Consideration of authorizing funding application for the Federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) for the Fallon Avenue Overpass (SB) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: MnDOT Region 7W is soliciting applications for local candidate projects for the fiscal year (FY) 2021 Local Surface Transportation Program (STP) Program. Region 7W consists of Benton, Sherburne, Stearns and Wright Counties. The program is for City's and County's within region 7W seeking Federal funding for roadway and bridge projects. This is the same Federal funding program awarded for the TH 25 /CSAH 75 Intersection Project. It is anticipated that approximately $2.8 to $3.0 million dollars and likely more will available for eligible projects within Region 7W with funds available in 2021. The exact amount of funding availability is expected to be released in December 2016. WSB is recommending that the Council consider applying for a portion of these funds for the Fallon Avenue overpass project. Even though right of way acquisition and design work has not commenced, the concept alignment drawing and cost estimates already prepared, are sufficient for completing the funding application. MnDOT's transportation planning staff and committee reviews the applications and ranks them based on the following criteria: • Access and Mobility • System Connectivity • Multimodal • System Condition • Safety • Economic Vitality • Cost Justification • Equity Over the past few years, most STP project applications have consisted of rural County road improvement projects with very few major transportation improvement projects. The larger transportation projects tend to rank higher and receive more funding as was the case with last year's applications. The Fallon Overpass project has a viable chance of being awarded a portion of the available funding, especially if right of way acquisition is secured with St. Henry's Church. The estimated project cost including right of way acquisition, engineering, administrative and construction costs is $8.8 million. This cost estimate includes several alternative design improvements that City staff and the Council will need to vet when design work is authorized. These alternatives would not affect the funding application since the project has a significantly higher cost than the funding City Council Agenda: 11/14/16 available. The estimated construction cost is approximately $6.5 million. Of that, the City must apply for between a minimum 30% or maximum 80% of the construction cost, which would total $1.95 million at a minimum or $5.2 million at a maximum in Federal funding requested. If the minimum amount is awarded to the City, it leaves the remaining funding available (estimated at $1 million of more) for other applicants, so that the total funding is distributed to multiple projects and not awarded to one project. It has been MnDOT's past practice to award Federal funds to multiple projects. The application deadline is January 6, 2017. On February 15, 2017, the Region 7W Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) will review the rankings and applicant presentations and make their recommendation to the Central Minnesota Area Transportation Partnership (ATP). The ATP then recommends these projects for inclusion in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STEP). Almost always, the recommendations of the TAC are approved and included in the STIP. If these funds are awarded to the City, the City would then need to pass a resolution accepting the funding, committing to the project's development and construction and commit to 20% matching funds. Federal funds as opposed to non - Federal funds require additional environmental document preparation (i.e. Project Memo) and review by State and Federal agencies. This process adds at least 6 months to a project schedule before a project can be bid. If right of way acquisition with St. Henry's Church is complete by the end of 2016 and design work can commence at that time, construction of the project could potentially commence in 2018 at the earliest if there are no significant obstacles with the project process. Al. Budget impact: The fee to complete of the Federal funding application and presentation to Region 7W TAC is estimated at $2,500 and has been included with the engineering department budget for 2016. Federal funds is only one funding source for the project. Other funds including tax abatement bonds, advancing State Aid funds and utilizing capital improvement funds are other sources for funding the entire project cost. A2. Staff Workload Impact: WSB transportation department staff will prepare the application for City staff review and input. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to authorize funding application for the FY 2021 Federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) for the Fallon Avenue Overpass. 2. Motion to deny at this time. City Council Agenda: 11/14/16 C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving Alternative #1. The Fallon Avenue Overpass has been studied, included in the City's adopted Transportation Plan and has been on the horizon for several years. The City Council approved a concept plan alignment on May 25, 2015. There are several factors why the City should consider applying for Federal funds at this time including: nearing finalization of right of way acquisition with St. Henry's Church; progression of development (Fleet Farm, etc.) with increasing traffic volumes creating the need to move forward with the improvement; may spur continued development in the area, and; need for improve operation / relief for increasing traffic on TH 25 and CSAH 18. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. FY 2021 Local Surface Transportation Program (STP) — Application Materials B. City Council Approved Concept Layout CENTRAL MINNESOTA AREA TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP LOCAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM PART 1 - APPLICATION GUIDANCE 1. GENERAL This document provides guidance for cities and counties interested in applying for federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) funding through the Central Minnesota Area Transportation Partnership (ATP). The guidance consists of two parts: Part 1 — Application Guidance and Part 2 — Application Instructions. Part 1 gives an overview of the ATP's programming process, including the regional approach it employs to solicit and select local projects for federal funding. It also contains the minimum eligibility requirements that applicants must meet for their projects to be considered for funding by the ATP. For those local agencies with qualifying projects who are interested in applying for funding, Part 2 provides them with helpful instructions in completing the actual application form itself. 2. PROCESS OVERVIEW The ATP annually develops an Area Transportation Improvement Program (ATIP) covering a four -year period. The ATIP is a prioritized list of transportation projects that the ATP recommends for inclusion in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). Once in the STIP, projects become eligible for federal transportation funding. The ATP uses a decentralized approach in recommending local projects for federal funding and inclusion in the ATIP. This approach enlists the help of two regional development commissions [e.g., Region 5 Development Commission (Region 5) and East Central Regional Development Commission ( ECRDC)], one metropolitan planning organization [e.g., St. Cloud Area Planning Organization (APO)], and the Region 7W Transportation Policy Board (Region 7W). The ATP values the role that the regional partners play in identifying their transportation needs and priorities. Accordingly, the regions receive a target amount of federal funding to use in setting their locally- sponsored transportation priorities. The amount each region is targeted is based on a distribution formula that takes into account system size and usage factors and federal funding availability. The regions are responsible for recommending a prioritized list of transportation projects to the ATP based on their target funding levels. While each region has flexibility in setting their investment priorities, they all follow a similar process and schedule set forth by the ATP in soliciting and selecting projects for consideration in the ATIP. Region 5 and Region 7W annually solicit projects for the fourth year of the ATIP while the ECRDC and the St. Cloud APO solicit every other year to develop a five -year program. The regions follow the below steps in developing their list of priorities to recommend to the ATP for inclusion in the ATIP: • Sending out federal application materials to all potential applicants • Receiving completed applications from jurisdictions by the solicitation deadline • Verifying all candidate projects meet the minimum federal and ATP eligibility requirements • Evaluating eligible candidate projects using region's project assessment criteria and process • Recommending a rank - ordered list of projects to the ATP for programming consideration 3. PROJECT ELIGIBILITY Federal STP funds provide a flexible source of funding that may be used by cities and counties for projects on any Federal -aid eligible highway or street. They may also be used for bridge projects on any public road. While transit capital is also eligible for STP funding, the ATP utilizes a separate process for applicants requesting funding for these types of projects. 3.1. Primary Project Types Listed below are the primary project type categories eligible to receive funding through the ATP process. Additional details regarding project eligibility for these categories can be found in Part 2 (Application Instructions), Section 4 (Project Type) of this guidance. • New alignment roadway construction • Roadway expansion defined as adding capacity by constructing a new travel lane • Roadway reconstruction Page 1 of 8 • Roadway reclamation, reconditioning, and resurfacing • Bridge replacement or rehabilitation • Safety and /or operational improvements 3.2. Eligibility Exceptions Applicants are advised some regions have taken official action to make exceptions on what types of projects may be eligible for federal funding in their region. These regions made these exceptions to emphasize and focus federal funding on those transportation needs important to their areas. The following exceptions are in effect: Eligible cities and counties in Region 7W (outside of the St. Cloud APO 20 -year planning area) may nominate projects in any of the primary project type categories listed above. However, they may only nominate Roadway Reclamation projects under the "Roadway Reclamation, Reconditioning & Resurfacing" category. The other three regions are not subject to this restriction. • Eligible cities and counties within the St. Cloud APO 20 -year planning area may apply for federal funding for Planning. Planning includes those activities occurring before the selection of a preferred alternative. Federal funds may be used for corridor studies /planning activities where specific construction projects are the intended outcome. • Eligible cities and counties within the St. Cloud APO 20 -year planning area may apply for federal funding for Right of Way (R/W) Acquisition. Funding for R/W is limited to reimbursement for the costs that were paid for the acquired property (to be based on the Fair Market Value), not the value of the property at the time for which reimbursement is requested. Applicants receiving funding for R/W must initiate construction within ten years from the date of acquisition. 3.3. Minimum Eligibility Requirements Applicants seeking STP funding must meet certain minimum federal and ATP eligibility requirements. The minimum requirements are designed to assist the applicant in determining whether their proposed project is appropriate to receive federal funding. These criteria are also used by the regional planning partners in screening and evaluating candidate projects for funding. Figure 1 identifies the seven eligibility criteria established by the ATP along with the definition of each criterion. Figure 1: ATP Local Surface Transportation Program Project Eligibility Criteria This is the average daily traffic (ADT) computed for the most recent count Existing ADT for the roadway. Twenty year ADT is used for non - existing roadways and expansion projects. This is the minimum functional classification for a roadway in order for it to Minimum Functional Classification receive federal funds This is the minimum amount of federal funds that may be requested for the project. Projects receiving federal funding require extensive amounts of documentation and investigation during project development. Projects Minimum Federal Fund Request should be of a certain magnitude to effectively optimize the use of federal funds. Otherwise, the administration and development costs may exceed the benefit of the federal funds that are being requested for the project Project must be consistent with state, regional, and local long -range Project in Existing Plan or Program plans, including plans and studies prepared by the RDC or MPO or a locally adopted capital improvement plan. Projects that cross multiple local government units must be accompanied by a letter and /or official action indicating all affected local units of Assured Coordination with All Jurisdictions government are in agreement with the concept of the proposed project. This is to make sure that projects have the support of the local units of government, which potentially have a veto power over that project. Applicant must provide assurance that they have secured the necessary local match for their project. The local match is a minimum of 20 percent Assured Local Match of the total project cost for which federal funds are being requested and any additional costs not covered by federal funds necessary to complete the project as proposed in the application. Project must demonstrate that it improves the movement of people and Movement of People and Freight freight. Regions will utilize information from Section 7 (Project Qualifications ) of the application to make this determination. Page 2 of 8 Figure 2 establishes the minimum project requirements by investment category to qualify for STP funding. Applicants must meet all of the requirements associated with investment category for which they are seeking funding prior to making application to the region. Applications that do not meet these criteria will be rejected and not considered for federal funding. Figure 2: ATP Minimum Project Eligibility Requirements by Investment Category ROADWAY BRIDGE QUALIFYING CRITERIA URBAN RURAL REPLACE NEW REHAB SAFETY EXISTING NEW ALIGN EXISTING NEW ALIGN 1 Existing ADT 2,000 3,000 200 400 25 400 R 25 200 3,000 U Maj -Col- Maj -Col -R 2 Minimum Collector Collector Major Major Public R Public Collector- Functional Functional Class Collector Collector Road Collector- Road U 3 Minimum Federal 200K 200K 200K 200K 50K 50K 50K 100K Fund Request (B /C >1) 4 Project in Existing Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Plan or Program Assured 5 Coordination with Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes All Jurisdictions 6 Assured Local Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Match Movement of 7 People and Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Freight 4. APPLICATION CHECKLIST Applicants must submit the following items by the application deadline: ❑ Local Surface Transportation Program Funding Application. Ensure the completion of all sections: • Section 1 — Applicant Information • Section 2 — Project Identification • Section 3 -- Technical Information • Section 4 — Project Type • Section 5-- Short Title Description • Section 6 — Purpose and Need • Section 7 — Project Qualifications • Section 8 — Cost Summary • Section 9 — Right of Way Needs • Section 10 — Project Timeline • Section 11 — Supporting Project Details • Section 12 — Additional Project Details (Optional) ❑ Location Map. Map should clearly depict project location and should be reproducible. ❑ Letters of Support. A letter of support will not be required by the applicant at the time of application. However, support letters will be required if the proposed project impacts and requires participation by multiple jurisdictions. If the proposed project is successfully selected for federal STP funding, the applicant will be reauired to secure a resolution of support from their governing body to demonstrate its commitment to the project's development and construction and to assure the availability of the necessary local matching funds. Page 3 of 8 5. REGIONAL PLANNING CONTACTS Region 5: Counties of Cass, Crow Wing, Morrison, Todd and Wadena Staci Headley Region 5 Development Commission 200 First Street Northeast, Suite 2 Staples, MN 56479 Phone: (218) 894 -3233, Ext. 5 Fax: (218) 894 -1328 Email: sheadley(a-)regionfive.org Region 7E: Counties of Chisago, Isanti, Kanabec, Mille Lacs and Pine Bob Bollenbeck East Central Regional Development Commission 100 Park Street South Mora, MN 55051 Phone: (320) 679 -4065, Ext. 24 Fax: (320) 679 -4120 Email: robert.bollenbeck(a)ecrdc.org Region 7W: Counties of Benton, Sherburne, Stearns, and Wright (excluding the St. Cloud metropolitan area) Jon Mason Senior Planner MnDOT District 3 7694 Industrial Park Road Baxter, MN 56425 Phone: (218) 828 -5780 or 1- 800 - 657 -3971, Ext. 5780 Fax: (218) 828 -5814 Email: lon.mason a(�state.mn.us St. Cloud APO: Cities of St. Augusta, St. Cloud, St. Joseph, Sartell, Sauk Rapids and Waite Park Joseph Mueller St. Cloud Area Planning Organization 1040 County Road 4 St. Cloud, MN 56304 Phone: (320) 252 -7568 Fax: (320) 252 -6557 Email: mueller(aDstcloudapo.org Other Contact Resources: Kelvin Howieson District State Aid Engineer MnDOT District 3 7694 Industrial Park Road Baxter, MN 56425 Phone: (218) 828 -5707 or 1- 800 - 657 -3971, Ext. 5707 Fax: (218) 828 -5814 Email: kelvin.howieson(aD_state.mn.us Steve Voss District Transportation Planning Director MnDOT District 3 7694 Industrial Park Road Baxter, MN 56425 Phone: (218) 828 -5779 or 1- 800 - 657 -3971, Ext. 5779 Fax: (218) 828 -5814 Email: steve.voss(cD.state.mn.us Page 4 of 8 CENTRAL MINNESOTA AREA TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP LOCAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM PART 2 - APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Provide contact information as requested. • Name — Name of requesting governing body. 2. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION • RDC /MPO Region — Enter one of the following based on the county that the project is located: • Region 5 — Cass, Crow Wing, Morrison, Todd, and Wadena Counties • Region 7W — Benton, Sherburne, Stearns, and Wright Counties • Region 7E — Isanti, Kanabec, and Mille Lacs Counties. (Pine and Chisago Counties not in District 3 programming area) • St. Cloud APO — Jurisdictions within the St. Cloud metropolitan planning area • Congressional /Legislative Districts — Enter the congressional and legislative districts based on the congressional district and legislative district that the project is located. • Route # — Enter the route name and number associated with the route system (e.g., CSAH 1, CR 12, MSAS 123, etc.) • Street Name — Enter name of street if route goes by a different title. • Beginning Termini — Enter the location from where the project will start (e.g., "0.2 MILES FROM JCT CSAH 1," "AT MISSISSIPPI RIVER BRIDGE," etc.) Be sure to include entire length of project impacts. • Ending Termini — Enter the location to where the project will terminate. Ensure termini covers entire length of project impacts. See "Beginning Termini" examples. • Length — Enter the length of the project in miles to the nearest tenth. 3. TECHNICAL INFORMATION A. Functional Classification — Check the box pertaining to the federal functional classification of the route for which improvements are planned. This is the classification on file with MnDOT. Consult with your Regional Planning Contact or the District State Aid Engineer if in doubt. B. Traffic Volume — Enter current annual average daily traffic (AADT) from most recent traffic count. Enter 20 -year AADT using county multiplier. If using other forecasting methodology, please indicate method in Section 12 (Additional Project Details) of the application. C. Pavement Condition — Enter age in years from last resurfacing change to the present year. Enter pavement rating, such as the Road Quality Index (RQI) for County State Aid Highway routes or the equivalent for other roadways /streets. If other than RQI, please note method for rating your pavement condition. D. Bridge Condition — Enter the Sufficiency Rating (SR) of the bridge if your project involves bridge replacement or rehabilitation. Bridge replacement will require a SR of 50 or less to qualify. If project involves work to a historic bridge structure, please indicate so in Section 12 (Additional Project Details) of the application. 4. PROJECT TYPE • Check the box that best describes the category of work being proposed. Check more than one box if your project affects multiple categories. Applicants should refer to Part A (Application Guidance), Section 3 (Project Eligibility) of this guidance for additional clarification on project eligibility and to determine if there are any exceptions to the project types in their region. Consult with your Regional Planning Contact or the District State Aid Engineer if you still have questions regarding the eligibility of your project for federal funding. • Check "Other" box if your project involves improvements not listed in one of the previous project type categories. Then specify the type of work proposed in the space provided. Figure 3 is a sample list of eligible improvements that may qualify under this section. Other work not listed in this figure may also qualify. Consult with your Regional Planning Contact or the District State Aid Engineer before applying to determine eligibility. All proposed Page 5 of 8 work must satisfy the minimum eligibility requirements set forth in Part A (Application Guidance), Section 3.3 (Minimum Eligibility Requirements) of this guidance. Projects may be bundled to meet minimum cost requirements but must collectively demonstrate relationship to one another. Figure 3: Sample List of Eligible Improvements for "Other" Project Type • Turn Lanes 0 Warning Flashers • Traffic Si nalization 0 Roundabout Construction • Edge Treatments 0 Shoulder Widening • Rumble Strips 0 Shoulder Paving • Median Barrier • Right of Way Acquisition St. Cloud APO only) • Traffic Signal Installation Planning St. Cloud APO only) 5. SHORT TITLE DESCRIPTION Provide a brief description of location and work. The county and city name should be included before the use of CSAH, CR, or CSAS. Please limit description to 120 total characters. Roadway Example: FROM CROW WING CSAH 18 IN NISSWA TO CASS CSAH 42 IN PINE RIVER, MILL AND OVERLAY FROM 0.5 MI S OF WRIGHT CR 106 TO 500 FT S OF SCHOOL BLVD IN MONTICELLO, GRADE AND SURFACE Bridge Example: OVER RUM RIVER 0.6 MI W OF CAMBRIDGE, REPLACE BRIDGE #984 6. PURPOSE AND NEED State the Purpose and Need (P &N) for your project. The P &N statement explains why the project is being proposed and what objectives are to be met. It should be clear, concise, well- organized, and easily understood. It should identify the problem(s), not the solution(s). • Need - Identifies transportation deficiencies or problems that need to be addressed, e.g., "The bridge has structural deficiencies that need to be addressed to provide for a safe river crossing." • Purpose — Is a broad statement of the primary intended transportation result and other related objectives to be achieved by the project. It should be based on, and written after the Needs have been identified. Figure 4 provides a sample structure for writing a P &N statement as taken from the MnDOT Highway Project Development Process. Figure 4: MnDOT Sample Purpose and Need Statement Structure Background - A short discussion of the context for the project, including location, background on the existing facility and its role in the transportation system; Need - A description of the problems or unsatisfactory conditions that currently exist or are reasonably expected with the existing facility or project area. The identified Needs should be clearly defined with respect to their relative importance as project objectives (primary vs. secondary). Primary Needs The primary needs section should discuss the primary transportation problems to be solved, i.e., the problems that led to initiation of the project. Secondary Needs The discussion of secondary needs includes a description of opportunities for other transportation problems or system improvements within the project study area that may be able to be addressed, if feasible, concurrent with addressing the primary needs. The following factors may be helpful in establishing the 'Need' for a proposed action: Capacity and transportation demand Safety Legislative directive Continued on next page) Page 6 of 8 Economic development and planned growth Modal interrelationships System linkage (`connecting link') Transportation facility deficiencies (Continued from previous page) Each need should be demonstrated through specific quantitative investigation and supported by discussion of appropriate data. For example, if improving safety is identified as a need, the text should include supporting data such as the number of accidents that have occurred in the past, the relative frequency of accidents and the type /severity of accidents that have occurred. (The supporting data may be included the appendix, to minimize the length of the Needs statement text.) Examples of supporting data include: Bridge evaluation reports Pavement evaluation reports Safety analysis Forecast travel demand and roadway capacity Performance criteria (e.g., established in an Interregional Corridor plan or Highway Investment Plan), Congestion /delay data Additional Considerations — Describe other desirable project elements or effects that are not central to the purpose and need, but are nonetheless important considerations (e.g., environmental protection, scenic improvements, economic considerations, etc.). These considerations should be discussed separately from the project Needs. Purpose - A very clear, concise description of the primary goals the project is expected to attain (usually no more than one or two sentences); a "big picture" of the desired results. (e.g., the purpose is to improve safety along a highway segment that has a high crash rate). The Purpose should be based on (and, therefore, written after) the Needs have been defined. I Source: MnDOT Highway Project Development Process, http: / /www. dot .state.nm.us /planning /lii)dp /. I 7. PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS Respond to the following seven qualifying factors. Please limit your response to the space provided under each factor in the application. Be as complete as possible in your response. The information you provide will be used by the region in evaluating your project. A. Access and Mobility — Explain how your project increases the accessibility and mobility options for people and freight. B. System Connectivity — Explain how your project enhances the integration and connectivity of the transportation system for people and freight. C. Multimodal — Explain how your project promotes walking, bicycling, transit, and other modes as an integral component of the transportation system D. System Condition — Explain the current system conditions and how this project will preserve or enhance the transportation infrastructure and /or operations. E. Safety — Explain how your project or elements of your project may improve safety. F. Economic Vitality — Explain how your project supports the economic development and job retention /creation goals in your community and region. G. Equity — What was the last year your jurisdiction received federal aid for a construction project. 8. COST SUMMARY Enter the estimated costs for your project that are eligible for federal participation. Generally this includes all construction - related costs, including mobilization, traffic control and contingencies. Ineligible items include associated administrative and engineering costs. Enter the amount of federal funds you are requesting and your agency's local match. Federal Highway Administration requires a non - federal match of at least 20 percent of project costs. Regions reserve the right to limit the amount of federal funds being recommended on any project. Therefore, applicants may be requested to exceed the minimum 20 percent matching requirements to maximize and leverage available funds targeted to the region. However, federal participation may not be less than 30 percent. Page 7 of 8 9. RIGHT OF WAY NEEDS Check the appropriate box if you anticipate the project will involve the acquisition of right of way, require an easement of property, or cause a relocation of buildings /displacement of residents or businesses. Applicants requiring right of way should anticipate completion of this activity in the project timeline. 10. PROJECT TIMELINE Indicate the estimated timeframe (e.g., month /year) when you anticipate completing the environmental documentation, construction plans, and right -of -way acquisition (if required). In addition, provide construction start date and anticipated duration of construction in the space provided. Applicants requiring the completion of more substantial environmental review documentation, such as an Environmental Assessment or Environmental Impact Statement, should anticipate a longer project development timeline. 11. SUPPORTING PROJECT DETAILS Reply to the four questions below relating to your project. The information you provide will enable reviewers to determine public support for your project and provide an indication of your agency's project development needs and deliverability goals. A. Consistency with State, Region, or Local Plan or Program — State, regional, and local agencies have developed numerous comprehensive plans and various transportation plans, studies, and programs. These plans provide documentation on the existing conditions and planned improvements as well as demonstrate public support. As a result, the facilities identified in these plans are likely to provide the greatest public benefits to all the residents. B. Assurance of Local Match — Applicants who are recommended for funding by their respective region will be required to provide assurance of the matching funds in writing by resolution adopted by the governing body after selection of the project by the region. C. Advance Construction — Advance Construction (AC) is a programming option to allow agencies to accelerate the construction of their project in advance of the apportionment of federal funds. An AC project is treated the same as any other federal project and must be authorized prior to advertising for letting or expending any funds on the project. Local governments selecting the AC option for their project can move ahead the project in the STIP to the year they wish to construct the project. They must agree to meet all project development requirements to meet their desired construction schedule and upfront the full cost of construction. In exchange, they will then be reimbursed the federal funds programmed for the project in the year the AC Payback is shown in the STIP. D. Environmental Document Path - Indicate the environmental document path your project will likely follow. Consult with the District State Aid Engineer if in doubt. 12. ADDITIONAL PROJECT DETAILS This section is optional unless information is required to be provided from Section 3 (Technical Information) of the application. Applicants may provide additional information about their project that is not otherwise requested in the application. To that end, applicants should only include information they feel is pertinent to the region in reviewing and ranking the project. 13. APPLICANT SIGNATURE Sign and date application to certify commitment toward your proposed project and completion of all the application requirements. Forward a copy of your completed application with other items identified in Part 1 (Application Guidance), Section 4 (Application Checklist) to your Regional Planning Contact by the application deadline. Page 8 of 8 REGION 7W PROJECT ASSESSMENT OVERALL RANKING EVALUATION WORKSHEET Agency Name: Project (Work) Type: Route No.: Wor Street Name: Beginning Ending Termini: Termini: Project Qualification Comments Rank - (H)igh (M)edium (L)ow Access and Mobility - Explain how the project increases the < 5,000 ADT = Low (L) accessibility and mobility options for people and freight. 5,000- 10,000 = Medium (M) • Implements access management strategies /techniques > 10,000 = High (H) • Improves level of service (LOS) by enhancing facility capacity Must demonstrate improvements. Additional • Reduces travel time bump for "Low" if improvement accommodates heavy • Eliminates /reduces freight impediments /bottlenecks truck, improves access spacing (i.e. access closures /consolidation ), etc. System Connectivity - Explain how the project enhances the Improves urban /rural collector = Low (L) integration and connectivity of the transportation system for people Improves urban /rural arterial = Medium (M) and freight. Improves urban /rural principal = High (H) • Fulfills region's functional classification goals One additional bump for "Low or Medium" if improvement otes multi jurisdictional /regional projects (based on above) that connects /involves multiple orts system development (e.g., 10 -ton route, etc.) Llnrvolves jurisdictions, AND if improvement increases roadway to multiple partners 10 -ton capacity. Multimodal - Explain how the project promotes walking, bicycling, No multimodal accommodations = Low (L) transit, and other modes as an integral component of the Wide /wider shoulders = Medium (M) transportation system. Designated bike lane, sidewalk, trail or transit • Accommodates pedestrians (e.g., sidewalks) (i.e. park -n -ride or bus pull -out) = High (H) • Accommodates bicycles (e.g., bike lanes, trails) • Accommodates pedestrians, bicycles, and other modes (e.g., CS) System Condition - Explain the current system conditions and how < 10 Year Old Pavement (YOP) = Low (L) this project will preserve or enhance the transportation 10 -19 YOP = Medium (M) 20 YOP = High (H) infrastructure and /or operations. • Improves pavement condition (e.g., ride quality index (RQI) or equivalent AND /OR rating) RQI 3.1 — 5.0 = Low (L) SR >80 = Low (L) • Improves bridge condition (e.g., sufficiency rating) RQI 2.1 — 3.0 = Medium (M) SR 50 -80 = Medium (M) • Improves drainage condition RQI 0.0 — 2.0 = High (H) SR <50 = High (H) • Achieves state -aid design requirements Safety - Explain how the project or elements of the project may Little to no safety improvements = Low (L) improve safety. Few safety improvements included as part of • Implements local safety plan strategies project (i.e. striping & signing but no rumble) = Medium (M) • Preserves safety infrastructure /appurtenances (turn lanes, signals, signs, Major multiple safety improvements (i.e. PROWAG /ADA, etc.) /expanded • Addresses public right of way accessibility guidelines (PROWAG) new shoulder, and new signing, striping, & OR improving • Implements traffic calming techniques /strategies ty (projected) reduction crashes or facility with fatal /serious crashes =High (H) Economic Vitality - Explain how the project supports the economic No direct link to improved economy (i.e. dev. & job retention /creation goals in the community & region. improvement to commercial /industrial = Low (L) Improves structural capacity or access = Medium (M) • Improves commercial/Industrial access Improvement is referenced in jurisdiction economic dev. • Promotes economic development plans and recruitment efforts plan or improves structural capacity AND access = High (H) Cost Justification — Explain why the project is a sound investment for the region. Little or no documentation /Low B/C = Low (L) Documentation supports investment = Med (M) • Considers lower cost alternatives before selecting preferred alternative Detailed cost analysis /study with innovative • Considers benefit -cost in overall evaluation of project results = High (H) Equity - What was the last year the jurisdiction received federal aid for a construction project? LOCAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FUNDING APPLICATION Central Minnesota Area Transportation Partnership FY 2021 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Local Agency: Project Manager: Address: Title: Phone: Fax: Email: Project Contact (/f different from Proj. Mgr.): Title: Phone: Fax: Email: 2. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION RDC /MPO Region: Congressional District: Legislative District: Length: Mi. Route # &/or Street Name: Beginning Termini: Endin Termini: 3. TECHNICAL INFORMATION A. Functional Classification of Roadway /Highway � B pavement Condition (Check all that apply) Urban Rural Age of Rating: ❑ Urban Principal Arterial ❑ Rural Principal Arterial Surface: ❑ Urban Minor Arterial ❑ Rural Minor Arterial ❑ Urban Collector ❑ Rural Major Collector C. Traffic Volume D. Bridge Condition Current AADT: 20 -Year AADT: SR: 4. PROJECT TYPE (Check all that apply) ❑ New Alignment ❑ Roadway Reclamation, Reconditioning & Resurfacing ❑ Roadway Expansion ❑ Bridge ❑ Roadway Reconstruction ❑ Other: (specify) 5. SHORT TITLE STIP DESCRIPTION (Limited to 920 characters) 6. PURPOSE AND NEED (Summary) Page 1 October 2016 7. PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS A. Access and Mobility Explain how the project increases the accessibility and mobility options for people and freight. B. System Connectivity Explain how the project enhances the integration and connectivity of the transportation system for people and freight. C. Multimodal Explain how the project promotes walking, bicycling, transit, and other modes as an integral component of the transportation system. D. System Condition Explain the current system conditions and how this project will preserve or enhance the transportation infrastructure and /or operations. Page 2 October 2016 E. Safety Explain how the project or elements of the project may improve safety. F. Economic Vitality Explain how the project supports the economic development and job retention /creation goals in the community and region. G. Equity What was the last year your jurisdiction received federal aid for a construction project? 8. COST SUMMARY Item Amount % of Total Federal Funds Requested Maximum 80% /Minimum 30% Local Matching Funds Minimum 20% Total Eligible Costs 9. RIGHT OF WAY NEEDS (Check all that apply) Property to be purchased? ❑ Yes ❑ No Easement(s) needed? ❑ Yes ❑ No Donated property? ❑ Yes ❑ No Relocations anticipated? ❑ Yes ❑ No 10. PROJECT TIMELINE Phase Estimated Month / Year Completed Environmental Document Completed / Construction Plan Prepared / Right of Way Acquired / Construction Start / Estimated Project Duration Months Page 3 October 2016 11. SUPPORTING PROJECT DETAILS A. Is the project identified in an approved or adopted statewide, regional, or local plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, please list all relevant plans: B. Has your agency developed a financial strategy to match the federal funds and any additional funding necessary to complete your proposed project? ❑ Yes ❑ No If no, please explain: C. If successfully funded, is your agency considering accelerating the project development and construction using Advance Construction? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, please list planned year of construction: D. Which environmental document path will the project likely follow? (If unsure, consult with the District State Aid Engineer.) ❑ Project Memo ❑ Environmental Assessment ❑ Environmental Impact Statement 12. ADDITIONAL PROJECT DETAILS (Optional) The applicant recommends that this project be selected for federal funding and attests a commitment to the project's development, implementation, construction, maintenance, management, and financing. Signature Title Date The sponsor will also be responsible for assuring future maintenance of the completed project by resolution and any additional costs associated with the project not covered by its request. Page 4 October 2016 jf r '� f • f +tee 1' �r !j -� _ I i ' ry so k- No 4r OL Alp IR y { 4p , 411 llwm� I r r ; ; Ar mk 1 -- -- r hw ! f l xlp. 6 0 mm �q 4 x� vv v N 0 O 4 t t O 4 h S m b S G m n a Federal Funding Application Local Surface Transportation Program (STP) Fallon Avenue Overpass November 14, 2016 (, Monticello Funding Program Information • MNDOT Region 7W application for FY 2021 Local Surface Transportation Program (STP) • 7W consists of cities and counties in Wright, Benton, Sherburne and Stearns Counties • Same funding awarded for TH 25 /CSAH 75 project. Awarded in 2013 for FY 2017 funds. • Annual Funding Program • 2021 funding to likely exceed $3M. Determined in December. • Funds distributed to 3 -5 projects out of typically 5 -10 applications. (, Monticello Fallon Avenue Overpass • Preliminary Concept Approved in 2015 • Agreement with St. Henry's Church • Preliminary Cost Estimate Prepared • Application submittal is at preliminary /concept level • Environmental documents and final design cannot begin prior to funding award • Timing aligns with application process M AO 4p Al • (, Monticello AA Application Process MnDOT's transportation planning staff and TAC reviews the applications and ranks them based on the following criteria: • Access and Mobility • System Connectivity • Multimodal • System Condition • Safety • Economic Vitality • Cost justification • Equity Major transportation projects tend to rank higher and receive more funding m (; Monticello Funding • Estimated $6.5M in construction cost • Alternative project elements need to be vetted • Required application for: • Minimum 30% _ $1.95M • Maximum 80% _ $5.2M • Available funding = $3.OM +/- (, Monticello MIL -dda��� Application Timelines • Application Deadline - January 6, 2017 • Region 7W TAC review - February 15, 2017 • City Resolution - by July 1, 2017 to commit to scope and matching funds • Construction by 2020 for federal funds 0 City Council Agenda: 11/14/16 4C. Consideration of discussion on direction for Christmas lights outlining the front of the Monticello Community Center on Walnut Street. (TM) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Members of the City Council had previously requested that staff look into placing Christmas decorations on the front of the Monticello Community Center (MCC). Council asked staff to check with the businesses on the east side of Walnut Street to correlate with their decorating design. After speaking with Bullseye Management, the company that manages the buildings, they noted that they did not decorate with Christmas lights in 2015, and they do not intend to decorate this year either. Staff has checked with venders on the cost of lighting the front of the MCC, which would be outlining the building and one spruce tree to the north side of the building. The lights would be commercial grade LED lights at an estimated cost of $2,000 to $2,500. The lights would be placed by Public Works staff. Al. Budget Impact: The cost of up to $2,500 to purchase the lights. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff time will be used to hang the lights and to take down the lights after the holidays. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the purchase of the LED lights at a cost of up to $2,500, and to authorize Public Works staff to hang the lights and to take down the lights after the holidays. 2. Motion to deny purchasing the LED Christmas lights. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is neutral. City staff will purchase and install lights if so desired by the City Council. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • None. City Council Agenda: 11/14/16 4D. Consideration of canvassing the returns and adopting Resolution 2016 -086 declaring the results of the 2016 General Election for the City of Monticello offices (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: MN State Statute Section 205.185, Subd. 3 calls for the City Council to canvass the election results within 3 to 10 days after a general election. The results must be canvassed and results declared at this meeting to meet the requirements. On Election Day November 8th, there were 6890 registered voters at the time the polls opened and 894 new registrations were processed during the course of the day. There were 4,788 voters recorded on Election Day and 1,373 absentee ballots were received and added to the vote totals resulting in a total of 6,161 voters. Of the 1,373 absentee ballots cast, 184 were new registrations. The results of the local races are noted in the attached resolution. A copy of the tapes showing the results for the city elections is included in the supporting data. Please note that the write -in totals were adjusted according to MN election rules which require all ballots to be manually reviewed for write -ins. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2016 accepting the canvass of the votes as listed and declaring the results of the 2016 General Election for the municipal offices of mayor and council members as follows: Mayor: Brian Stumpf Council Members: William Fair and Jim Davidson 2. Motion to table and call for a special meeting no later than November 18th, 2016. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City Staff recommends Alternative #1 as adoption of the resolution is required in order to comply with the provisions of Minnesota State Statutes. A brief update of the overall election process will be provided at the meeting. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2016 -086 B. Copy of results tapes showing vote totals C. Copy of official posted results from Secretary of State's website D. Copy of MN Statute 205.185 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. 2016-086 CANVASSING ELECTION RETURNS AND DECLARING RESULTS OF THE 2016 GENERAL ELECTION FOR CITY OF MONTICELLO MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER OFFICES WHEREAS, the City Clerk/Elections Administrator has duly presented to the City Council the results tapes of ballots cast in the November 8th, 2016 General Election, and election summary statements have been sworn to by the Judges of the Election; and WHEREAS, the total votes cast for the municipal offices voted upon are as follows: For Mayor (2 year term) Brian Stumpf 4568 Write -Ins 143 For Council Member (2 elected for 4 year terms) Jim Davidson 2324 William Fair 1598 Zachary Vickers 1359 Jim Bystrom 1323 Joseph Kraft 1066 Write -Ins (adjusted) 70 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREB Y RESOL VED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, that the totals listed above are deemed to be correct, the election is deemed to be valid, and the winners of the election are declared to be as follows: For Mayor (2 year term): Brian Stumpf For Council Member (4 year term): Jim Davidson William Fair ADOPTED BY the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota this 14th day of November, 2016. ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor G Mayor CITY OF MONTICELLO lot Nagar CIT4 Of NON1ICElLO 1729 Brian Stumpf 1825 70 Write In to Brian Stumpf 1 Over Votes Write In Under Votes 575 4r Over Votes 532 N Under Votes , . , ... Total Votes 245, 45 2332 l 1ata1 Vates� Cnc Mmbr CITY OF MONTICELLO Number to Vote Far: 2 Cnc Nmbr CI14 Of NONTICELtO 929 William Fair Number to'Vote for' 2 Jim Davidson SR x Jim Bystram 563 V illiam fair 889 s Joseph Kraft 432 Jim Davidson _ Zachary W. Vickers 539 =" Jim Bystram 536 Write In 246 Joseph Kraft Over Votes lechery W. Vickers 23 Under Votes 1831 2 Write In 1728 .........................0o Over Votes finder Votes ... .. . g664 OtB.l pates hasp Dist Brd Nmbr flt large NON11 -BIG LR Do'_- ` Mayor CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf 1014 i Write In 20 Over Votes 0 Under Votes 339 1otalUates .........................1373 � Cnc Nmbr CI14 OF MONTICELLO Number to Vote Far: 2 William Fair 422 Jim Davidson 506 Jim Bystrom 270 Joseph Kraft _ 226 Zachary W. Vickers 284 Write In 21 Over Votes 4 kt Under Votes 1013 Total Votes 2746 Page 1 of 1 OFFICE OF THE MINNESOTA SECRETARY OF STATE STEVE SIMON Unofficial R fiWesd4ftAnxbmb6xk0QM Tieng Viet PycCKWO +_�Z w -)z -)z -)a Afaar Cl-lo*3f, Prgytl ppi'Page Precincts Reporting in Municipality: 100% 1 of 1 Last Updated: 11/09/16 3:06 AM Voters Registered at 7AM : 6890 Results for Selected Contests in 43774 - Monticello Mayor (Monticello) Results By Precinct 1 precincts in contest. l of 1 precincts reported in municipality. Party Candidate Totals Pct Graph Nonpartisan Brian Stumpf 4568 96.96% - WRITE -IN ** WRITE -IN ** 143 3.04% Council Member (Monticello) (Elect 2) Results By Precinct 1 precincts in contest.1 of 1 precincts reported in municipality. Party Candidate Totals Pct Graph Nonpartisan William Fair 1598 20.65% Nonpartisan Jim Davidson 2324 30.03% _ Nonpartisan Jim Bystrom 1323 17.09%0 Nonpartisan Joseph Kraft 1066 13.77%0 Nonpartisan Zachary W. Vickers 1359 17.56% WRITE -IN ** WRITE -IN ** 70 0.90% © 2016 Office of the Minnesota Secretary of State - Terms & Conditions Page 1 of 1 11/9/2016 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2016 205.185 205.185 PROCEDURE. Subdivision 1. Materials, ballots. The municipal clerk shall prepare and have printed the necessary election materials, including ballots, for a municipal election. Subd. 2. Election, conduct. A municipal election shall be by secret ballot and shall be held and the returns made in the manner provided for the state general election, except as expressly provided by law. Subd. 3. Canvass of returns, certificate of election, ballots, disposition. (a) Between the third and tenth days after an election, the governing body of a city conducting any election including a special municipal election, or the governing body of a town conducting the general election in November shall act as the canvassing board, canvass the returns, and declare the results of the election. The governing body of a town conducting the general election in March shall act as the canvassing board, canvass the returns, and declare the results of the election within two days after an election. (b) After the time for contesting elections has passed, the municipal clerk shall issue a certificate of election to each successful candidate. In case of a contest, the certificate shall not be issued until the outcome of the contest has been determined by the proper court. (c) In case of a tie vote, the canvassing board having jurisdiction over the municipality shall determine the result by lot. The clerk of the canvassing board shall certify the results of the election to the county auditor, and the clerk shall be the final custodian of the ballots and the returns of the election. Subd. 4. Recount. A losing candidate at a municipal election may request a recount of the votes for that office subject to the requirements of section 204C.36. History: 1983 c 62 s 9; 1999 c 132 s 34; 1Sp2001 c 10 art 18 s 37; 2004 c 293 art 2 s 37,38; 2010 c 194 s 22 Copyright 0 2016 by the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. Monti cello COUNCIL CONNECTION November 14, 2016 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT TH 25/7TH STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT The project is currently out for bid with a bid opening date of December 1, 2016. The project bid results will be presented to the City Council on December 12, 2016 for consideration of award. The project must be awarded by January 11, 2017 to avoid conducting another public hearing as part of the assessment process since the statue only allows award within 1 year from the date of the improvement hearing. The improvement hearing was hold on January 11, 2016. Adjacent benefitting properties along 7th Street between TH 25 and Cedar Street are proposed to be assessed with the project for street and sidewalk improvements. Construction is anticipated to start in the spring of 2017 and be complete within 2 months. IN REPLY REFER TO: COMMENT ACK November 3, 2016 The Honorable Brian Stumpf Mayor, City of Monticello City Hall 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, Minnesota 55362 Dear Mayor Stumpf: This letter acknowledges receipt of a letter dated November 2, 2016, from Angela Schumann, Community Development Director, regarding the Preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report for the City of Monticello, dated June 22, 2011. Ms. Schumann submitted comments regarding the corporate limit boundary of the City of Monticello and the Mississippi River base flood elevation discrepancy between the Wright and Sherburne County FIRM Panels. Please note that the Department of Homeland Security's Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) considers appeals as only those submittals that relate to the addition or modification of flood hazard information (i.e., Base Flood Elevations, base flood depths, Special Flood Hazard Area boundaries, zone designations, or regulatory floodways) and that satisfy the data requirements defined in Title 44, Chapter I, Part 67 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Because the submittal did not meet these criteria, FEMA refers to it as a `comment.' FEMA will evaluate the issues raised in the referenced letter and the submitted data. If additional data or information are required to resolve the comments, FEMA will contact your community. If you have additional questions, please contact Sarah Hayman of our FEMA staff in Chicago, Illinois, either by telephone at (312) 408 -5344 or by e -mail at Sarah.Hayman @fema.dhs.gov. Sincerely, (/Xa4CX-Z, Ael Christine Stack Director, Mitigation Division FEMA Region V cc: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator, City of Monticello www.feina.gov U.S. Department of Homeland Security FEMA Region V 536 South Clark Street, Sixth Floor Chicago, Illinois 60605 FEMA IN REPLY REFER TO: COMMENT ACK November 3, 2016 The Honorable Brian Stumpf Mayor, City of Monticello City Hall 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, Minnesota 55362 Dear Mayor Stumpf: This letter acknowledges receipt of a letter dated November 2, 2016, from Angela Schumann, Community Development Director, regarding the Preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report for the City of Monticello, dated June 22, 2011. Ms. Schumann submitted comments regarding the corporate limit boundary of the City of Monticello and the Mississippi River base flood elevation discrepancy between the Wright and Sherburne County FIRM Panels. Please note that the Department of Homeland Security's Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) considers appeals as only those submittals that relate to the addition or modification of flood hazard information (i.e., Base Flood Elevations, base flood depths, Special Flood Hazard Area boundaries, zone designations, or regulatory floodways) and that satisfy the data requirements defined in Title 44, Chapter I, Part 67 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Because the submittal did not meet these criteria, FEMA refers to it as a `comment.' FEMA will evaluate the issues raised in the referenced letter and the submitted data. If additional data or information are required to resolve the comments, FEMA will contact your community. If you have additional questions, please contact Sarah Hayman of our FEMA staff in Chicago, Illinois, either by telephone at (312) 408 -5344 or by e -mail at Sarah.Hayman @fema.dhs.gov. Sincerely, (/Xa4CX-Z, Ael Christine Stack Director, Mitigation Division FEMA Region V cc: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator, City of Monticello www.feina.gov i s±FF 5 O44ti Monticello Monthly Report 2016 Wright County Sheriff's Office Sheriff Joe Hagerty 3800 Braddock Ave. NE, Buffalo, MN 55313 1- 800 - 362 -3667 Fax:763- 682 -7610 �OFESSIONq�r Q •y ti 2 Q N 4 CARING Printed on • - •- 1 Incident Start Date /Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 911 Hang -up Total: 27 10/01/16 20:51 911 Hang -up 2016068541 911 10/04/16 09:26 911 Hang -up 2016069147 911 10/06/1611:00 911 Hang -up 2016069686 911 10/06/1612:38 911 Hang -up 2016069704 911 10/06/1619:51 911 Hang -up 2016069807 911 10/07/16 18:18 911 Hang -up 2016070017 911 10/08/16 11:49 911 Hang -up 2016070192 911 10/11/1611:02 911 Hang -up 2016070900 911 10/11/1615:56 911 Hang -up 2016070969 911 10/11/16 23:53 911 Hang -up 2016071083 911 10/11/16 23:58 911 Hang -up 2016071084 911 10/12/16 14:23 911 Hang -up 2016071204 911 Hang -up WCSOP16029279 911 10/12/1616:57 911 Hang -up 2016071248 911 10/13/16 15:48 911 Hang -up 2016071464 911 10/14/16 00:48 911 Hang -up 2016071594 911 10/15/16 08:27 911 Hang -up 2016071918 911 10/15/16 13:54 911 Hang -up 2016071966 911 10/16/16 16:54 911 Hang -up 2016072224 911 10/17/16 15:19 911 Hang -up 2016072432 911 10/18/16 15:03 911 Hang -up 2016072680 911 10/19/16 17:56 911 Hang -up 2016073031 911 10/21/1611:09 911 Hang -up 2016073443 911 10/21/1614:17 911 Hang -up 2016073483 911 10/22/16 22:07 911 Hang -up 2016073854 911 10/25/1617:58 911 Hang -up 2016074509 911 10/25/16 21:59 911 Hang -up 2016074549 911 10/28/16 20:00 911 Hang -up 2016075340 911 911 Open Line Total: 21 10/02/16 12:06 911 Open Line 2016068681 911 10/03/16 10:57 911 Open Line 2016068913 911 10/03/16 11:16 911 Open Line 2016068918 911 10/07/16 15:07 911 Open Line 2016069969 911 10/09/16 07:20 911 Open Line 2016070400 911 10/09/16 10:32 911 Open Line 2016070428 911 10/10/16 17:29 911 Open Line 2016070727 911 10/11/16 14:24 911 Open Line 2016070947 911 10/12/16 11:47 911 Open Line 2016071184 911 10/13/16 16:37 911 Open Line 2016071477 911 ZUERCHER Page 1 of 23 Incident Start Date /Time Animal Initial Call CFS # 10/14/16 11:04 Animal 911 Open Line 2016071665 10/14/16 15:10 Animal 911 Open Line 2016071719 10/15/16 10:24 Animal 911 Open Line 2016071934 10/18/16 05:24 Animal 911 Open Line 2016072582 10/20/16 18:36 Animal 911 Open Line 2016073279 10/21/16 14:19 Phone 911 Open Line 2016073485 10/21/16 15:52 Animal 911 Open Line 2016073505 10/21/16 16:28 Phone 911 Open Line 2016073512 10/22/16 02:20 Animal 911 Open Line 2016073641 10/26/16 15:27 Phone 911 Open Line 2016074713 10/28/16 00:54 Animal 911 Open Line 2016075094 Abandoned Vehicle Total: 2 10/01/16 08:11 Abandoned Vehicle 10/10/16 11:07 Abandoned Vehicle Abuse Total: 2 10/11/16 05:06 Abuse 10/14/16 20:32 Abuse Agency Assist Total: 6 10/02/16 03:49 10/05/16 07:55 10/09/16 17:16 10/14/16 19:33 10/20/16 10:27 10/20/16 18:32 Agency Assist Agency Assist Agency Assist Agency Assist Agency Assist Agency Assist Animal Total: 17 10/01/1613:43 Animal 10/01/1614:09 Animal 10/01/1615:59 Animal 10/03/16 20:25 Animal 10/05/1616:07 Animal 10/05/1618:35 Animal 10/06/16 02:32 Animal 10/08/1613:36 Animal 10/12/1611:30 Animal 10/14/1617:33 Animal 10/16/1611:38 Animal 10/18/1610:58 Animal 10/19/1612:08 Animal 10/20/1611:51 Animal 10/21/1615:21 Animal 10/25/1619:55 Animal 10/30/1613:52 Animal Animal - Barking Dog Total: 1 10/21/16 23:27 Animal - Barking Dog Final Incident 2016068385 Abandoned Vehicle 2016070644 Abandoned Vehicle 2016070845 Abuse 2016071810 Agency Assist Case Number How Reported 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 911 WCSOP16028175 Phone WCSOP16029070 Phone WCSOP16029145 Phone WCSOP16029530 911 2016068631 Agency Assist WCSOP16028283 Phone 2016069389 Drugs WCSOP16028589 Phone 2016070490 Agency Assist WCSOP16029017 Phone 2016071792 Agency Assist WCSOP16029522 Phone 2016073167 Agency Assist WCSOP16030074 Phone 2016073275 DUI WCSOP16030124 Phone 2016068428 Phone 2016068433 Animal WCSOP16028199 911 2016068461 Phone 2016069052 Animal WCSOP16028457 Phone 2016069489 Animal WCSOP16028619 Phone 2016069538 Animal WCSOP16028641 Phone 2016069632 Animal WCSOP16028675 Phone 2016070214 Animal WCSOP16028905 Phone 2016071181 Phone 2016071762 Phone 2016072163 Animal WCSOP16029685 Phone 2016072618 Phone 2016072913 Animal WCSOP16029978 Phone 2016073181 Animal WCSOP16030083 Phone 2016073498 Citizen Aid WCSOP16030203 2016074527 Phone 2016075772 Phone 2016073613 Animal - Barking Dog WCSOP16030236 Phone ZUERCHER Page 2 of 23 Incident Start Date /Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported Animal - Bites - Attacks Total: 1 10/09/16 16:18 Animal - Bites - Attacks 2016070475 Animal - Bites - Attacks WCSOP16029010 Phone Assault Total: 6 10/05/16 07:48 Assault 2016069387 Assault WCSOSRO16028587 Phone 10/10/16 23:47 Assault 2016070817 Assault WCSOP16029135 Phone 10/14/16 03:15 Assault 2016071607 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP16029448 Phone 10/20/1611:14 Assault 2016073176 Assault WCSOP16030080 Phone 10/23/16 04:13 Assault 2016073906 Fight WCSOP16030365 911 10/24/1611:56 Assault 2016074184 Assault WCSOP16030452 Phone Burglary Total: 2 Check Welfare 2016070020 Check Welfare WCSOP16028829 10/01/16 08:29 Burglary 2016068387 Burglary WCSOP16028177 Phone 10/15/1610:00 Burglary 2016071929 Burglary WCSOP16029585 Phone Check Welfare Total: 23 10/01/16 16:28 Check Welfare 2016068472 Check Welfare WCSOP16028217 Phone 10/02/16 09:28 Check Welfare 2016068654 Check Welfare WCSOP16028290 Phone 10/02/16 14:21 Check Welfare 2016068706 Check Welfare WCSOP16028314 Phone 10/03/16 18:27 Check Welfare 2016069027 Check Welfare WCSOP16028443 Phone 10/06/16 05:32 Check Welfare 2016069644 Check Welfare WCSOP16028680 911 10/06/16 18:32 Check Welfare 2016069796 Check Welfare WCSOP16028741 911 10/07/16 18:22 Check Welfare 2016070020 Check Welfare WCSOP16028829 Phone 10/08/16 01:24 Check Welfare 2016070116 Check Welfare WCSOP16028867 Phone 10/13/16 12:24 Check Welfare 2016071415 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP16029376 Phone 10/13/16 22:39 Check Welfare 2016071572 Check Welfare WCSOP16029437 911 10/14/16 08:23 Check Welfare 2016071631 Check Welfare WCSOP16029457 Phone 10/15/16 00:44 Check Welfare 2016071870 Check Welfare WCSOP16029553 Phone 10/15/16 03:40 Check Welfare 2016071892 Check Welfare WCSOP16029560 911 10/16/16 18:59 Check Welfare 2016072253 Check Welfare WCSOP16029736 Phone 10/17/16 12:09 Check Welfare 2016072387 Check Welfare WCSOP16029785 Phone 10/23/16 16:52 Check Welfare 2016074013 Check Welfare WCSOP16030404 Phone 10/25/16 08:25 Check Welfare 2016074373 Check Welfare WCSOP16030530 Phone 10/25/16 18:19 Check Welfare 2016074515 Check Welfare WCSOP16030585 Phone 10/26/16 15:59 Check Welfare 2016074723 Check Welfare WCSOP16030661 Phone 10/26/16 16:08 Check Welfare 2016074726 Check Welfare WCSOP16030662 Phone 10/27/16 20:39 Check Welfare 2016075052 Check Welfare WCSOP16030780 Phone 10/28/16 17:35 Check Welfare 2016075288 Check Welfare WCSOP16030866 Phone 10/29/16 11:19 Check Welfare 2016075487 Drugs WCSOP16030955 Phone Citizen Aid Total: 6 10/02/16 12:02 Citizen Aid 2016068680 Citizen Aid WCSOP16028302 Phone 10/03/16 17:08 Citizen Aid 2016069004 Threats WCSOP16028433 Phone 10/11/16 13:56 Citizen Aid 2016070939 Citizen Aid WCSOP16029176 Phone 10/13/16 23:45 Citizen Aid 2016071583 Citizen Aid WCSOP16029440 Phone 10/23/16 15:11 Citizen Aid 2016073989 Citizen Aid WCSOP16030397 Phone 10/27/16 15:49 Citizen Aid 2016074970 Citizen Aid WCSOP16030740 Phone ZUERCHER Page 3 of 23 Incident Start Date /Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported Civil Complaint Total: 23 10/03/16 06:41 Civil Complaint 2016068846 Civil Complaint WCSOP16028370 Phone 10/03/16 17:40 Civil Complaint 2016069013 Civil Complaint WCSOP16028436 Phone 10/05/16 19:02 Civil Complaint 2016069546 Drugs WCSOP16028644 911 10/07/16 17:18 Civil Complaint 2016070002 Civil Complaint WCSOP16028822 911 10/09/16 20:36 Civil Complaint 2016070533 Civil Complaint WCSOP16029029 Phone 10/11/16 08:33 Civil Complaint 2016070864 Civil Complaint WCSOP16029150 Phone 10/11/16 17:01 Civil Complaint 2016070986 Civil Complaint WCSOP16029193 Phone 10/11/16 17:05 Civil Complaint 2016070989 Civil Complaint WCSOP16029196 911 10/13/16 10:49 Civil Complaint 2016071402 Civil Complaint WCSOP16029367 Phone 10/13/16 15:43 Civil Complaint 2016071461 Civil Complaint WCSOP16029396 Phone 10/13/16 16:44 Civil Complaint 2016071480 Criminal Damage to Property WCSOP16029404 Phone 10/14/16 18:04 Civil Complaint 2016071769 Civil Child Custody WCSOP16029513 911 10/15/16 17:35 Civil Complaint 2016072008 Civil Complaint WCSOP16029619 Phone 10/17/16 14:10 Civil Complaint 2016072407 Civil Complaint WCSOP16029793 Phone 10/18/16 05:35 Civil Complaint 2016072583 Civil Complaint WCSOP16029862 Phone 10/19/16 13:47 Civil Complaint 2016072937 Threats WCSOP16029988 Phone 10/21/16 12:07 Civil Complaint 2016073456 Civil Complaint WCSOP16030186 Phone 10/22/16 13:19 Civil Complaint 2016073721 Civil Complaint WCSOP16030285 911 10/22/16 21:53 Civil Complaint 2016073852 Theft WCSOP16030335 Officer 10/25/16 15:36 Civil Complaint 2016074472 Civil Complaint WCSOP16030572 Phone 10/29/16 15:47 Civil Complaint 2016075541 Civil Complaint WCSOP16030977 Phone 10/30/16 13:53 Civil Complaint 2016075773 Civil Complaint WCSOP16031074 Phone 10/31/16 11:05 Civil Complaint 2016075984 Civil Complaint WCSOP16031163 Phone Civil Process Total: 53 10/03/16 08:55 Civil Process 2016068879 Officer 10/03/16 09:07 Civil Process 2016068883 Officer 10/03/16 09:50 Civil Process 2016068893 Officer 10/03/16 15:05 Civil Process 2016068969 Officer 10/03/16 15:17 Civil Process 2016068973 Officer 10/03/16 15:22 Civil Process 2016068976 Officer 10/04/16 12:12 Civil Process 2016069187 Officer 10/04/16 12:20 Civil Process 2016069190 Officer 10/04/16 15:42 Civil Process 2016069243 Officer 10/04/16 15:51 Civil Process 2016069245 Officer 10/05/16 10:54 Civil Process 2016069419 Officer 10/06/16 08:39 Civil Process 2016069663 Officer 10/06/16 14:09 Civil Process 2016069720 Officer 10/07/16 10:22 Civil Process 2016069917 Officer 10/07/16 15:55 Civil Process 2016069980 Officer 10/11/16 14:29 Civil Process 2016070948 Officer 10/11/16 14:47 Civil Process 2016070951 Officer 10/11/16 15:40 Civil Process 2016070965 Officer 10/11/16 17:24 Civil Process 2016070996 Officer 10/11/16 17:36 Civil Process 2016070999 Officer 10/11/16 18:16 Civil Process 2016071009 Officer ZUERCHER Page 4 of 23 Incident Start Date /Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 10/11/16 18:20 Civil Process 2016071012 Officer 10/12/16 15:20 Civil Process 2016071219 Officer 10/12/16 15:47 Civil Process 2016071230 Officer 10/12/16 18:29 Civil Process 2016071267 Officer 10/14/16 09:25 Civil Process 2016071643 Officer 10/14/16 09:49 Civil Process 2016071646 Officer 10/14/16 10:08 Civil Process 2016071654 Officer 10/14/16 16:06 Civil Process 2016071740 Civil Process WCSOP16029499 10/17/16 08:42 Civil Process 2016072341 Officer 10/17/16 08:57 Civil Process 2016072342 Officer 10/17/16 09:05 Civil Process 2016072343 Officer 10/17/16 09:18 Civil Process 2016072345 Officer 10/18/16 10:41 Civil Process 2016072614 Officer 10/18/16 10:52 Civil Process 2016072616 Officer 10/19/16 11:01 Civil Process 2016072901 Officer 10/21/16 14:41 Civil Process 2016073489 Officer 10/24/16 08:48 Civil Process 2016074146 Officer 10/25/16 09:16 Civil Process 2016074383 Officer 10/25/16 09:26 Civil Process 2016074386 Officer 10/25/16 09:32 Civil Process 2016074391 Officer 10/25/16 09:51 Civil Process 2016074393 Officer 10/25/16 13:54 Civil Process 2016074448 Officer 10/26/16 08:33 Civil Process 2016074618 Officer 10/26/16 08:44 Civil Process 2016074621 Officer 10/26/16 08:58 Civil Process 2016074623 Officer 10/27/16 08:41 Civil Process 2016074883 Officer 10/27/16 08:50 Civil Process 2016074886 Officer 10/28/16 11:01 Civil Process 2016075180 Officer 10/28/16 14:53 Civil Process 2016075224 Officer 10/31/16 10:38 Civil Process 2016075980 Officer 10/31/16 17:14 Civil Process 2016076056 Officer 10/31/16 17:23 Civil Process 2016076058 Officer Commercial Fire Alarm Total: 2 10/07/16 21:04 Commercial Fire Alarm 2016070055 Commercial Fire Alarm WCSOP16028842 Phone 10/31/16 13:31 Commercial Fire Alarm 2016076014 Commercial Fire Alarm WCSOP16031179 Phone Commercial General Alarm Total: 21 10/05/16 02:15 Commercial General 2016069368 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP16028580 Phone 10/05/16 19:06 Commercial General 2016069550 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP16028645 Phone 10/06/16 20:57 Commercial General 2016069817 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP16028750 Phone 10/08/16 02:28 Commercial General 2016070131 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP16028870 Phone 10/08/16 05:02 Commercial General 2016070142 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP16028873 Phone 10/09/16 19:27 Commercial General 2016070518 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP16029024 Phone 10/10/16 08:49 Commercial General 2016070614 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP16029059 Phone 10/13/16 04:33 Commercial General 2016071348 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP16029336 Phone 10/18/16 18:34 Commercial General 2016072743 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP16029935 Phone ZUERCHER Page 5 of 23 Incident Start Date /Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 10/19/16 19:24 Commercial General 2016073051 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP16030041 Phone 10/20/16 21:34 Commercial General 2016073342 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP16030141 Phone 10/21/16 07:07 Commercial General 2016073400 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP16030167 Phone 10/22/16 09:31 Commercial General 2016073672 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP16030262 Phone 10/22/16 15:11 Commercial General 2016073740 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP16030295 Phone 10/24/16 02:54 Commercial General 2016074112 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP16030427 Phone 10/26/16 02:54 Commercial General 2016074596 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP16030611 Phone 10/27/16 14:35 Commercial General 2016074950 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP16030729 Phone 10/28/16 18:42 Commercial General 2016075310 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP16030876 Phone 10/29/16 05:07 Commercial General 2016075437 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP16030925 Phone 10/31/16 06:07 Commercial General 2016075927 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP16031137 Phone 10/31/16 19:24 Commercial General 2016076092 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP16031217 Phone Court Order Violation Total: 4 10/14/16 14:02 Court Order Violation 2016071696 Court Order Violation WCSOP16029479 Phone 10/14/16 17:28 Court Order Violation 2016071760 Court Order Violation WCSOP16029509 Phone 10/16/16 15:05 Court Order Violation 2016072202 Court Order Violation WCSOP16029705 Phone 10/20/16 10:08 Court Order Violation 2016073166 Court Order Violation WCSOP16030073 Phone Criminal Damage to Property Total: 8 10/01/16 11:08 Criminal Damage to 2016068404 Criminal Damage to Property WCSOP16028187 Phone 10/04/16 23:28 Criminal Damage to 2016069346 Criminal Damage to Property WCSOP16028577 Phone 10/08/16 15:03 Criminal Damage to 2016070227 Criminal Damage to Property WCSOP16028911 Phone 10/09/16 14:04 Criminal Damage to 2016070455 Criminal Damage to Property WCSOP16029000 Phone 10/13/16 15:06 Criminal Damage to 2016071451 Criminal Damage to Property WCSOP16029391 Phone 10/16/16 18:29 Criminal Damage to 2016072248 Criminal Damage to Property WCSOP16029733 911 10/21/16 07:04 Criminal Damage to 2016073398 Criminal Damage to Property WCSOP16030166 Phone 10/26/16 13:13 Criminal Damage to 2016074670 Criminal Damage to Property WCSOP16030643 Phone CSC Sex Offense Total: 2 10/16/16 15:47 CSC Sex Offense 2016072210 CSC Sex Offense WCSOP16029709 Phone 10/22/16 18:25 CSC Sex Offense 2016073798 CSC Sex Offense WCSOP16030318 Phone Disabled Vehicle Total: 1 10/31/16 06:36 Disabled Vehicle 2016075930 Disabled Vehicle WCSOP16031140 Phone Disorderly Total: 3 10/10/1617:16 Disorderly 2016070725 Disorderly WCSOP16029098 911 10/17/1615:33 Disorderly 2016072438 Disorderly WCSOP16029808 Phone 10/29/16 20:34 Disorderly 2016075610 Disorderly WCSOP16030998 Phone Domestic Disturbance Total: 24 10/02/16 00:13 Domestic Disturbance 2016068603 Civil Complaint WCSOP16028271 Phone 10/02/16 16:11 Domestic Disturbance 2016068729 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP16028323 Phone 10/05/16 14:40 Domestic Disturbance 2016069459 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP16028608 Phone 10/06/16 08:54 Domestic Disturbance 2016069667 Trespass WCSOP16028689 Phone 10/08/16 10:19 Domestic Disturbance 2016070178 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP16028889 Phone 10/08/16 18:01 Domestic Disturbance; 2016070271 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP16028929 911 10/09/16 22:07 Domestic Disturbance 2016070551 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP16029037 911 ZUERCHER Page 6 of 23 Incident Start Date /Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 10/10/16 20:16 Domestic Disturbance 2016070777 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP16029122 Phone 10/11/16 17:59 Domestic Disturbance 2016071003 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP16029204 Phone 10/12/16 11:08 Domestic Disturbance 2016071178 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP16029268 Phone 10/12/16 11:49 Domestic Disturbance 2016071185 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP16029270 Phone 10/13/16 09:55 Domestic Disturbance 2016071385 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP16029359 Phone 10/16/16 19:50 Domestic Disturbance 2016072261 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP16029740 Phone 10/20/16 14:08 Domestic Disturbance 2016073211 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP16030093 Phone 10/20/16 23:12 Domestic Disturbance 2016073353 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP16030146 Phone 10/24/16 21:52 Domestic Disturbance 2016074317 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP16030509 911 10/26/16 23:45 Domestic Disturbance 2016074822 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP16030691 911 10/27/16 18:04 Domestic Disturbance 2016075006 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP16030756 Phone 10/28/16 11:22 Domestic Disturbance 2016075185 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP16030816 911 10/29/16 13:17 Domestic Disturbance 2016075513 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP16030967 911 10/29/16 19:42 Domestic Disturbance 2016075593 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP16030991 Phone 10/29/16 21:06 Domestic Disturbance 2016075620 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP16031000 911 10/29/16 23:53 Domestic Disturbance 2016075672 Noise WCSOP16031023 Phone 10/31/16 02:40 Domestic Disturbance 2016075920 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP16031133 911 Drugs Total: 5 10/13/1610:30 Drugs 2016071395 Drugs WCSOSIU16029363 Phone 10/17/1611:17 Drugs 2016072370 Drugs WCSOP16029775 10/24/1610:55 Drugs 2016074173 Drugs WCSOSR016030445 Phone 10/30/16 21:10 Drugs 2016075862 Drugs WCSOP16031113 Phone 10/31/16 01:30 Drugs 2016075915 Drugs WCSOP16031130 Phone Extra Patrol Total: 3 10/07/16 20:44 Extra Patrol 2016070049 Extra Patrol WCSOP16028840 Phone 10/11/16 10:09 Extra Patrol 2016070882 Extra Patrol WCSOP16029248 Phone 10/28/16 18:36 Extra Patrol 2016075307 Extra Patrol WCSOP16030875 Phone Fire - Gas Leak Total: 2 10/02/16 22:22 Fire - Gas Leak 10/10/16 15:25 Fire - Gas Leak Fire - Other Total: 4 2016068805 Fire - Gas Leak WCSOP16028356 Phone 2016070688 Fire - Gas Leak WCSOP16029091 911 10/02/16 18:57 Fire - Other 2016068769 Fire - Other WCSOP16028340 Phone 10/08/16 17:52 Fire - Other 2016070269 Fire - Other WCSOP16028927 Phone 10/20/16 15:59 Fire - Other 2016073228 Fire - Other WCSOP16030104 911 10/24/16 19:51 Fire - Other 2016074291 Fire - Other WCSOP16030497 Phone Fire - Smoke - Odor Total: 4 10/11/16 12:54 Fire - Smoke - Odor 2016070925 Fire - Smoke - Odor WCSOP16029173 Phone 10/18/16 06:20 Fire - Smoke - Odor 2016072587 Fire - Smoke - Odor WCSOP16029865 911 10/22/16 22:30 Fire - Smoke - Odor 2016073863 Fire - Smoke - Odor WCSOP16030340 911 10/24/16 17:20 Fire - Smoke - Odor 2016074256 Fire - Smoke - Odor WCSOP16030486 911 Fire - Structure Total: 1 10/13/16 13:08 Fire - Structure 'rZi>i[:1;�>/iCf►�:��RII. �irL�Y�]-Ji[:I�Y�XI:I��SiI ZUERCHER Page 7 of 23 Incident Start Date /Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Fire - Vehicle Total: 1 WCSOP16030176 Phone 10/15/16 13:18 Fire - Vehicle 2016071962 Fire - Vehicle Fireworks Total: 2 2016075329 Harassment 10/01/16 18:20 Fireworks 2016068498 Juvenile - Complaint 10/09/16 21:32 Fireworks 2016070546 Fireworks Fraud - Checks - Cards Total: 5 2016071678 10/06/16 17:50 Fraud - Checks - Cards 2016069784 Fraud - Checks - Cards 10/07/16 13:44 Fraud - Checks - Cards 2016069957 Theft 10/21/16 10:05 Fraud - Checks - Cards 2016073427 Fraud - Checks - Cards 10/25/16 11:11 Fraud - Checks - Cards 2016074413 Fraud - Checks - Cards 10/28/16 16:12 Fraud - Checks - Cards 2016075252 Fraud - Checks - Cards Fraud - Forgery Total: 1 2016070387 Warrant - Arrest 10/07/16 17:11 Fraud - Forgery 2016069998 Fraud - Forgery Fraud - Internet Total: 2 2016071462 10/21/16 15:17 Fraud - Internet 2016073497 10/29/16 10:26 Fraud - Internet 2016075476 Fraud - Internet Funeral Escort Total: 1 10/08/16 10:02 Funeral Escort 2016070175 Gun Incident Total: 2 Case Number How Reported WCSOP16029601 Phone WCSOP16028228 Phone WCSOP16029034 Phone WCSOP16028737 Phone WCSOP16028805 Phone WCSOP16030176 Phone WCSOP16030545 Phone WCSOP16030847 Phone WCSOP16028820 Phone Phone WCSOP16030950 Phone Phone 10/12/16 00:40 Gun Incident 2016071089 Suspicious -Circumstances WCSOP16029236 911 10/29/16 18:37 Gun Incident 2016075572 Gun Incident WCSOP16030982 Phone Harassment Total: 5 10/01/1618:23 Harassment 2016068501 Harassment 10/03/1611:51 Harassment 2016068922 Harassment 10/16/16 00:26 Harassment 2016072097 Harassment 10/28/1619:31 Harassment 2016075329 Harassment 10/31/1614:35 Harassment 2016076024 Harassment Hospice Death Total: 1 10/14/16 12:19 Hospice Death 2016071678 Indecent Exposure Total: 1 10/10/1613:45 Indecent Exposure 2016070672 Indecent Exposure Info Total: 6 10/06/16 07:40 Info 2016069654 10/08/16 11:57 Info 2016070195 10/09/16 04:19 Info 2016070387 Warrant - Arrest 10/10/16 09:36 Info 2016070621 10/13/16 15:47 Info 2016071462 10/29/16 19:17 Info 2016075585 Intoxicated Person Total: 3 WCSOP16028229 Phone WCSOP16028400 Phone WCSOP16029659 911 WCSOP16030883 Phone WCSOP16031187 Phone WCSOP16029086 Phone WCSOP16028968 Phone Phone Phone Phone Phone Phone ZU RCHER Page 8 of 23 Incident Start Date /Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 10/16/16 20:36 Intoxicated Person 2016072271 Intoxicated Person WCSOP16029743 911 10/23/16 16:06 Intoxicated Person 2016074003 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP16030401 Phone 10/29/16 21:11 Intoxicated Person: 2016075622 Intoxicated Person WCSOP16031004 Phone Juvenile - Complaint Total: 13 10/02/16 11:45 Juvenile - Complaint 2016068678 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP16028299 Phone 10/03/16 06:33 Juvenile - Complaint 2016068844 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP16028369 Phone 10/05/16 17:45 Juvenile - Complaint 2016069520 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP16028631 Phone 10/05/16 19:18 Juvenile - Complaint 2016069555 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP16028649 Phone 10/06/16 22:25 Juvenile - Complaint 2016069840 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP16028756 Phone 10/07/16 21:59 Juvenile - Complaint 2016070072 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP16028848 Phone 10/07/16 23:16 Juvenile - Complaint 2016070086 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP16028856 911 10/09/16 21:14 Juvenile - Complaint 2016070542 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP16029031 911 10/13/16 21:17 Juvenile - Complaint 2016071552 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP16029432 Phone 10/15/16 20:45 Juvenile - Complaint 2016072048 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP16029634 Phone 10/16/16 17:37 Juvenile - Complaint 2016072232 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP16029721 Phone 10/18/16 01:09 Juvenile - Complaint 2016072564 Suicidal - Attempt - Threat WCSOP16029854 Phone 10/20/16 11:41 Juvenile - Complaint 2016073180 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOSR016030082 Juvenile - Runaway Total: 1 10/28/16 23:23 Juvenile - Runaway 2016075392 Juvenile - Runaway WCSOP16030906 Phone Littering Total: 1 10/28/1616:56 Littering 2016075276 Littering WCSOP16030858 Phone Lock Out - Lock In Total: 1 10/16/16 12:49 Lock Out - Lock In 2016072175 Lock Out - Lock In WCSOP16029692 Phone Lost - Found Property Total: 7 10/05/16 14:32 Medical - Abdominal Lost - Found Property 2016069456 Lost - Found Property WCSOP16028607 10/09/16 10:37 Medical - Abdominal Pain Lost - Found Property 2016070429 Lost - Found Property WCSOP16028989 10/11/16 14:23 911 Lost - Found Property 2016070946 Lost - Found Property WCSOP16029179 10/14/16 01:33 Medical - Abdominal Lost - Found Property 2016071599 Lost - Found Property WCSOP16029446 10/19/16 12:42 Lost - Found Property 2016072920 Lost - Found Property WCSOP16029982 10/25/16 07:00 Lost - Found Property 2016074364 Lost - Found Property WCSOP16030526 10/27/16 15:33 Lost - Found Property 2016074967 Lost - Found Property WCSOP16030738 Medical - Abdominal Pain Total: 5 10/04/16 13:08 Medical - Abdominal 2016069199 Medical - Abdominal Pain WCSOP16028509 Phone 10/13/16 03:33 Medical - Abdominal 2016071343 Medical - Abdominal Pain WCSOP16029335 Phone 10/16/16 21:55 Medical - Abdominal 2016072282 Medical - Abdominal Pain WCSOP16029750 911 10/23/16 21:00 Medical - Abdominal 2016074063 Medical - Abdominal Pain WCSOP16030416 Phone 10/30/16 16:15 Medical - Abdominal 2016075806 Medical - Abdominal Pain WCSOP16031090 Phone Medical - Allergies - Stings Total: 1 10/14/16 08:43 Medical - Allergies - 2016071635 Medical - Allergies - Stings WCSOP16029460 911 Medical - Back Pain Total: 2 10/17/16 11:51 Medical - Back Pain 2016072382 Medical - Back Pain WCSOP16029780 Phone 10/17/16 17:11 Medical - Back Pain 2016072459 Medical - Back Pain WCSOP16029816 Phone ZUERCHER Page 9 of 23 Incident Start Date /Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Medical - Bleeding - Lacerations Total: 1 10/29/16 21:11 Medical - Bleeding - 2016075621 Medical - Bleeding - Medical - Breathing Problems Total: 10 10/01/16 01:37 Medical - Breathing 2016068352 10/02/16 17:10 Medical - Breathing 2016068741 10/02/16 18:40 Medical - Breathing 2016068765 10/04/16 18:59 Medical - Breathing 2016069299 10/06/16 15:24 Medical - Breathing 2016069741 10/08/16 05:54 Medical - Breathing 2016070147 10/14/16 00:53 Medical - Breathing 2016071596 10/17/16 01:40 Medical - Breathing 2016072311 10/25/16 12:51 Medical - Breathing 2016074434 10/25/16 13:27 Medical - Breathing 2016074442 Case Number How Reported WCSOP16031002 911 Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP16028163 911 Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP16028328 911 Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP16028339 911 Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP16028565 911 Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP16028719 911 Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP16028877 911 Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP16029445 911 Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP16029759 911 Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP16030553 911 Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP16030558 911 Medical - Diabetic Total: 1 10/14/16 22:10 Medical - Diabetic 2016071830 Medical - Diabetic WCSOP16029536 911 Medical - Fall Over 6 Feet Total: 1 10/30/16 12:28 Medical - Fall Over 6 2016075751 Medical - Fall Over 6 Feet WCSOP16031061 Phone Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet Total: 7 10/10/16 19:30 WCSOP16029114 Medical - Fall Under 6 2016070760 10/12/16 02:39 911 Medical - Fall Under 6 2016071109 10/16/16 05:08 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet Medical - Fall Under 6 2016072124 10/17/16 10:50 WCSOP16030048 Medical - Fall Under 6 2016072364 10/19/16 20:23 911 Medical - Fall Under 6 2016073064 10/22/16 18:12 10/30/16 20:01 Medical - Fall Under 6 2016073791 10/30/16 08:00 Medical - Fall Under 6 2016075719 Medical - Heart Problems Total: 1 10/24/16 12:09 Medical - Heart 2016074186 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP16029114 911 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP16029241 911 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP16029670 Phone Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP16029773 Phone Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP16030048 911 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP16030314 911 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP16031045 Phone Medical - Heart Problems WCSOP16030454 Phone Medical - Non Emergency Transport Total: 1 10/10/16 12:02 Medical - Non 2016070651 Medical - Non Emergency WCSOP16029074 911 Medical - Overdose - Poisoning Total: 1 10/03/16 21:56 Medical - Overdose - 2016069073 Medical - Overdose - PoisoninpCSOP16028461 911 Medical - Psychiatric - Behavioral Total: 8 10/01/16 20:12 Medical - Psychiatric - 2016068530 10/04/16 17:55 Medical - Psychiatric - 2016069285 10/08/16 21:39 Medical - Psychiatric - 2016070316 10/09/16 04:13 Medical - Psychiatric - 2016070386 10/13/16 02:12 Medical - Psychiatric - 2016071340 10/15/16 23:23 Medical - Psychiatric - 2016072086 10/25/16 10:41 Medical - Psychiatric - 2016074406 10/30/16 20:01 Medical - Psychiatric - 2016075854 Medical - Psychiatric - WCSOP16028245 Phone Medical - Psychiatric - WCSOP16028555 911 Medical - Psychiatric - WCSOP16028945 911 Medical - Psychiatric - WCSOP16028967 911 Medical - Psychiatric - WCSOP16029334 911 Medical - Psychiatric - WCSOP16029653 911 Medical - Psychiatric - WCSOP16030540 Phone Medical - Psychiatric - WCSOP16031107 911 ZUERCHER Page 10 of 23 Incident Start Date /Time Initial Call Medical - Seizure Total: 10 10/04/16 18:27 10/06/16 11:28 10/09/16 10:22 10/10/16 10:35 10/16/16 14:47 10/19/16 17:26 10/22/16 09:30 10/22/16 22:50 10/26/16 16:50 10/27/16 11:01 Medical - Seizure Medical - Seizure Medical - Seizure Medical - Seizure Medical - Seizure Medical - Seizure Medical - Seizure Medical - Seizure Medical - Seizure Medical - Seizure Medical - Sick Total: 12 10/04/16 11:56 Medical - Sick 10/11/16 22:19 Medical - Sick 10/12/16 08:42 Medical - Sick 10/14/16 02:37 Medical - Sick 10/14/16 12:38 Medical - Sick 10/14/16 15:16 Medical - Sick 10/18/16 04:34 Medical - Sick 10/18/16 12:05 Medical - Sick 10/19/16 14:44 Medical - Sick 10/21/16 02:29 Medical - Sick 10/23/16 05:35 Medical - Sick 10/30/16 18:06 Medical - Sick Medical - Stroke Total: 1 10/26/16 15:08 Medical - Stroke CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 2016069292 Medical - Sick WCSOP16028559 911 2016069695 Medical - Seizure WCSOSRO16028699 911 2016070425 Medical - Seizure WCSOP16028987 911 2016070633 Medical - Seizure WCSOSRO16029065 911 2016072194 Medical - Seizure WCSOP16029700 911 2016073021 Medical - Sick WCSOP16030028 911 2016073671 Medical - Seizure WCSOP16030261 Phone 2016073870 Medical - Seizure WCSOP16030343 911 2016074740 Medical - Seizure WCSOP16030670 911 2016074911 Medical - Seizure WCSOP16030716 911 2016069183 Medical - Sick WCSOP16028503 911 2016071067 Medical - Sick WCSOP16029228 911 2016071147 Medical - Sick WCSOP16029257 911 2016071605 Medical - Psychiatric - WCSOP16029447 911 2016071682 Medical - Sick WCSOP16029474 911 2016071721 Medical - Sick WCSOP16029490 911 2016072579 Medical - Sick WCSOP16029860 911 2016072636 Medical - Sick WCSOP16029887 911 2016072957 Medical - Sick WCSOP16029997 911 2016073382 911 2016073911 Medical - Sick WCSOP16030367 911 2016075832 Medical - Sick WCSOP16031101 911 2016074704 Medical - Stroke WCSOP16030651 911 Medical - Trauma Total: 1 10/11/16 17:36 Medical - Trauma 2016070998 Medical - Trauma WCSOP16029200 911 Medical - Unconscious - Fainting Total: 1 10/03/16 22:29 Medical - Unconscious - 2016069077 Suspicious -Person -Vehicle WCSOP16028464 Phone Medical - Unknown Total: 2 10/13/16 13:59 Medical - Unknown 10/22/16 20:21 Medical - Unknown Missing Person Total: 1 10/21/16 13:33 Missing Person Motorist Aid Total: 1 10/22/16 10:57 Motorist Aid MVA - Hit & Run Total: 3 10/02/16 14:03 MVA - Hit & Run 10/20/16 14:10 MVA - Hit & Run 10/23/16 17:02 MVA - Hit & Run 2016071436 Medical - Unknown WCSOP16029386 911 2016073827 Medical - Allergies - Stings WCSOP16030325 Phone 2016073475 Missing Person WCSOP16030196 Phone 2016073688 2016068704 MVA - Hit & Run WCSOP16028313 2016073212 MVA - Hit & Run WCSOP16030096 2016074017 MVA - Hit & Run WCSOP16030405 Phone ZUERCHER Page 11 of 23 Incident Start Date /Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported MVA - Injuries Total: 2 10/03/16 15:56 MVA - Injuries 2016068988 MVA - Injuries WCSOP16028430 10/15/16 09:19 MVA - Injuries 2016071925 MVA - Injuries WCSOP16029583 MVA - No Injuries Total: 25 10/01/16 16:05 MVA - No Injuries 2016068462 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP16028212 911 10/02/16 11:39 MVA - No Injuries 2016068675 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP16028298 911 10/04/16 11:55 MVA - No Injuries 2016069182 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP16028502 10/04/16 13:06 MVA - No Injuries 2016069198 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP16028508 10/05/16 17:57 MVA - No Injuries 2016069524 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP16028639 911 10/07/16 12:24 MVA - No Injuries 2016069937 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP16028793 10/08/16 11:31 MVA - No Injuries 2016070188 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP16028894 10/09/16 22:17 MVA - No Injuries 2016070554 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP16029039 10/11/16 17:02 MVA - No Injuries 2016070987 MVA - Hit & Run WCSOP16029194 10/12/16 16:48 MVA - No Injuries 2016071246 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP16029297 10/13/16 17:17 MVA - No Injuries 2016071487 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP16029407 911 10/13/16 20:19 MVA - No Injuries 2016071539 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP16029428 10/16/16 13:58 MVA - No Injuries 2016072186 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP16029696 Officer 10/16/16 19:36 MVA - No Injuries 2016072258 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP16029739 10/17/16 11:12 MVA - No Injuries 2016072367 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP16029774 10/19/16 10:29 MVA - No Injuries 2016072889 MVA - Hit & Run WCSOP16029968 10/22/16 03:57 MVA - No Injuries 2016073647 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP16030251 911 10/22/16 11:21 MVA - No Injuries 2016073693 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP16030274 10/22/16 13:13 MVA - No Injuries 2016073719 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP16030284 911 10/22/16 13:56 MVA - No Injuries 2016073728 Agency Assist WCSOP16030288 10/25/16 12:22 MVA - No Injuries 2016074426 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP16030547 10/25/16 15:09 MVA - No Injuries 2016074463 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP16030566 Phone 10/26/16 06:09 MVA - No Injuries 2016074601 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP16030614 10/28/16 15:34 MVA - No Injuries 2016075239 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP16030835 911 10/31/16 12:16 MVA - No Injuries 2016076000 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP16031170 Neighborhood Dispute Total: 3 10/10/16 09:04 Neighborhood Dispute 2016070618 Neighborhood Dispute WCSOP16029060 10/22/16 16:56 Neighborhood Dispute 2016073770 Neighborhood Dispute WCSOP16030306 10/24/16 20:56 Neighborhood Dispute 2016074308 Neighborhood Dispute WCSOP16030503 911 Noise Total: 10 10/14/16 20:58 Noise 2016071811 Noise WCSOP16029531 10/14/16 21:54 Noise 2016071824 Noise WCSOP16029534 10/16/16 01:21 Noise 2016072107 Noise WCSOP16029662 911 10/18/1617:14 Noise 2016072729 Noise WCSOP16029927 10/19/16 21:40 Noise 2016073076 Neighborhood Dispute WCSOP16030051 10/21/1616:52 Noise 2016073515 Noise WCSOP16030213 Phone 10/23/16 00:39 Noise 2016073885 Noise WCSOP16030358 10/23/1614:14 Noise 2016073980 Noise WCSOP16030392 10/30/16 01:11 Noise 2016075685 Noise WCSOP16031027 10/31/16 21:06 Noise 2016076126 Noise WCSOP16031230 ZUERCHER Page 12 of 23 Incident Start Date /Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported Off -Road Vehicle Complaint Total: 4 10/02/16 15:46 Off -Road Vehicle 2016068722 Off -Road Vehicle Complaint WCSOP16028321 Phone 10/03/16 09:42 Off -Road Vehicle 2016068890 Off -Road Vehicle Complaint WCSOP16028388 Phone 10/15/16 14:37 Off -Road Vehicle 2016071974 Off -Road Vehicle Complaint WCSOP16029606 Phone 10/16/16 14:07 Off -Road Vehicle 2016072189 Off -Road Vehicle Complaint WCSOP16029698 Phone Open Door -Window Total: 1 10/25/16 01:05 Open Door - Window 2016074342 Open Door - Window WCSOP16030519 Ordinance Violation Total: 2 10/07/16 07:47 Ordinance Violation 2016069890 Ordinance Violation WCSOP16028771 10/11/16 11:22 Ordinance Violation 2016070905 Ordinance Violation WCSOP16029164 Parking Total: 7 10/03/1614:37 Parking 2016068957 Parking WCSOP16028419 10/03/1617:39 Parking 2016069012 Parking WCSOP16028435 10/05/1614:55 Parking 2016069460 Parking WCSOP16028610 10/07/1611:33 Parking 2016069926 Parking WCSOP16028786 10/14/1612:20 Parking 2016071679 Parking WCSOP16029471 10/25/1615:25 Parking 2016074467 Parking WCSOP16030568 10/31/1618:09 Parking 2016076070 Parking WCSOP16031207 Phone Call Total: 1 10/28/16 20:52 Phone Call 2016075353 Other POR Check Total: 1 10/27/16 09:29 POR Check 2016074892 Officer Probation Check Total: 1 10/13/16 21:51 Probation Check 2016071563 Officer Pursuit Total: 1 10/29/16 21:42 Pursuit 2016075634 Pursuit WCSOP16031007 Officer Repossession Total: 3 10/17/1618:06 Repossession 2016072479 10/18/1614:25 Repossession 2016072671 10/22/1612:03 Repossession 2016073704 Residential Medical Alarm Total: 1 10/31/16 08:26 Residential Medical 2016075950 Residential Medical Alarm WCSOP16031148 Phone SIA Area Watch Total: 14 10/06/16 21:16 SIA Area Watch 2016069822 10/06/16 23:25 SIA Area Watch 2016069849 10/06/16 23:27 SIA Area Watch 2016069850 10/08/16 04:05 SIA Area Watch 2016070138 10/10/16 04:08 SIA Area Watch 2016070590 10/10/16 04:17 SIA Area Watch 2016070591 10/17/16 01:31 SIA Area Watch 2016072308 ZUERCHER Page 13 of 23 Incident Start Date /Time SIA Business Walk Initial Call CFS # 10/18/16 04:20 SIA Area Watch 2016072577 10/18/16 23:25 SIA Area Watch 2016072806 10/19/16 01:26 SIA Area Watch 2016072829 10/21/1618:06 SIA Area Watch 2016073531 10/21/16 18:41 SIA Area Watch 2016073540 10/30/16 12:55 SIA Area Watch 2016075758 10/31/16 01:29 SIA Area Watch 2016075914 SIA Business Walk Through Total: 10 10/15/16 01:17 SIA Business Walk 2016071880 10/16/16 00:58 SIA Business Walk 2016072104 10/16/16 06:08 SIA Business Walk 2016072127 10/17/16 02:33 SIA Business Walk 2016072317 10/24/16 02:38 SIA Business Walk 2016074110 10/24/16 19:03 SIA Business Walk 2016074281 10/25/16 02:42 SIA Business Walk 2016074350 10/28/16 02:33 SIA Business Walk 2016075125 10/29/16 01:00 SIA Business Walk 2016075407 10/31/16 20:08 SIA Business Walk 2016076111 SIA Community Presentation Total: 2 10/15/16 10:12 SIA Community 2016071931 10/15/16 12:03 SIA Community 2016071953 SIA Door Check Total: 10 10/04/16 01:05 SIA Door Check 2016069100 10/06/16 00:32 SIA Door Check 2016069608 10/06/16 01:29 SIA Door Check 2016069623 10/07/16 02:30 SIA Door Check 2016069874 10/18/16 04:20 SIA Door Check 2016072576 10/19/16 02:04 SIA Door Check 2016072831 10/21/16 23:39 SIA Door Check 2016073617 10/22/16 00:39 SIA Door Check 2016073626 10/24/16 00:22 SIA Door Check 2016074097 10/27/16 04:12 SIA Door Check 2016074850 SIA Foot Patrol Total: 5 10/05/16 23:58 SIA Foot Patrol 2016069602 10/14/16 01:42 SIA Foot Patrol 2016071602 10/16/16 01:50 SIA Foot Patrol 2016072111 10/20/16 01:21 SIA Foot Patrol 2016073105 10/27/16 02:04 SIA Foot Patrol 2016074846 SIA Other Total: 3 10/16/16 08:13 SIA Other 2016072139 10/28/16 00:56 SIA Other 2016075097 10/28/16 01:03 SIA Other 2016075099 Final Incident Case Number How Reported ZUERCHER Page 14 of 23 Incident Start Date /Time Initial Call SIA Parks Total: 28 10/01/16 07:25 SIA Parks 10/02/16 07:03 SIA Parks 10/02/16 21:14 SIA Parks 10/04/16 21:27 SIA Parks 10/05/16 01:26 SIA Parks 10/06/16 01:15 SIA Parks 10/06/16 18:26 SIA Parks 10/09/16 23:34 SIA Parks 10/10/16 16:46 SIA Parks 10/11/16 15:16 SIA Parks 10/14/16 05:25 SIA Parks 10/15/16 01:02 SIA Parks 10/15/16 16:44 SIA Parks 10/15/16 23:06 SIA Parks 10/16/16 05:40 SIA Parks 10/16/16 07:50 SIA Parks 10/19/16 16:57 SIA Parks 10/21/16 15:00 SIA Parks 10/21/16 17:37 SIA Parks 10/21/16 21:09 SIA Parks 10/22/16 21:25 SIA Parks 10/23/16 20:31 SIA Parks 10/24/16 04:47 SIA Parks 10/24/16 19:43 SIA Parks 10/26/16 01:37 SIA Parks 10/28/16 01:38 SIA Parks 10/29/16 02:19 SIA Parks 10/31/16 20:29 SIA Parks Sign - Light Repair Total: 1 10/18/16 11:34 Sign - Light Repair Stolen - Vehicle Total: 2 10/04/16 12:08 Stolen - Vehicle 10/11/16 08:19 Stolen - Vehicle Stoparm Violation Total: 1 10/28/16 16:50 Stoparm Violation CFS # 2016068380 2016068645 2016068795 2016069325 2016069361 2016069616 2016069795 2016070570 2016070717 2016070957 2016071611 2016071877 2016071991 2016072077 2016072126 2016072135 2016073008 2016073493 2016073526 2016073579 2016073843 2016074054 2016074119 2016074288 2016074584 2016075108 2016075420 2016076115 2016072628 Final Incident 2016069185 Stolen - Vehicle 2016070861 Stolen - Vehicle 2016075272 Stoparm Violation Suspicious - Circumstances Total: 22 10/01/16 03:08 Suspicious - 2016068363 10/01/16 19:08 Suspicious - 2016068507 10/02/16 02:48 Suspicious - 2016068624 10/04/16 08:17 Suspicious - 2016069133 10/04/16 14:30 Suspicious - 2016069219 10/04/16 18:11 Suspicious - 2016069287 10/05/16 18:44 Suspicious - 2016069541 Case Number How Reported Officer Phone WCSOP16028504 Phone WCSOP16029149 Phone WCSOP16030862 Other Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP16028167 Phone Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP16028233 Phone Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP16028279 Phone Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP16028483 Phone Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP16028523 911 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP16028557 Phone Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP16028642 Phone ZUERCHER Page 15 of 23 Incident Start Date /Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 10/05/16 23:10 Suspicious - 2016069599 Check Welfare WCSOP16028666 Phone 10/06/16 13:05 Suspicious - 2016069709 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP16028709 911 10/10/16 13:24 Suspicious - 2016070668 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP16029084 Phone 10/13/16 13:15 Suspicious - 2016071428 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP16029382 Phone 10/13/16 17:20 Suspicious - 2016071489 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP16029414 Phone 10/16/16 04:19 Suspicious - 2016072121 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP16029669 911 10/17/16 11:57 Suspicious - 2016072384 Check Welfare WCSOP16029784 Phone 10/21/16 03:10 Suspicious - 2016073384 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP16030158 Phone 10/22/16 00:58 Suspicious - 2016073628 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP16030243 911 10/25/16 00:34 Suspicious - 2016074336 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP16030517 Officer 10/25/16 22:02 Suspicious - 2016074551 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP16030600 Phone 10/28/16 06:53 Suspicious - 2016075138 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP16030801 Phone 10/28/16 09:22 Suspicious - 2016075159 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP16030807 Phone 10/30/16 18:29 Suspicious - 2016075839 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP16031102 Phone 10/31/16 10:19 Suspicious - 2016075977 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP16031161 Phone Suspicious - Person - Vehicle Total: 17 10/04/16 21:41 Suspicious - Person - 2016069330 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP16028573 911 10/08/16 04:34 Suspicious - Person - 2016070140 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP16028871 Phone 10/08/16 19:15 Suspicious - Person - 2016070290 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP16028936 Phone 10/09/16 03:54 Suspicious - Person - 2016070384 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP16028970 Phone 10/12/16 01:07 Suspicious - Person - 2016071094 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP16029237 911 10/12/16 17:52 Suspicious - Person - 2016071260 Drugs WCSOP16029307 Phone 10/21/16 02:53 Suspicious - Person - 2016073383 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP16030157 911 10/23/16 20:26 Suspicious - Person - 2016074053 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP16030413 Phone 10/25/16 17:21 Suspicious - Person - 2016074499 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP16030581 Phone 10/26/16 15:10 Suspicious - Person - 2016074705 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP16030653 911 10/26/16 15:27 Suspicious - Person - 2016074712 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP16030656 Phone 10/27/16 19:38 Suspicious - Person - 2016075035 Drugs WCSOP16030767 Phone 10/28/16 01:49 Suspicious - Person - 2016075113 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP16030791 Phone 10/28/16 02:56 Suspicious - Person - 2016075128 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP16030796 Phone 10/28/16 16:42 Suspicious - Person - 2016075271 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP16030854 911 10/29/16 19:04 Suspicious - Person - 2016075580 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP16030986 Phone 10/29/16 22:26 Suspicious - Person - 2016075644 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP16031011 Phone Theft Total: 24 10/02/1611:44 Theft 2016068677 Theft WCSOP16028301 Phone 10/05/1615:19 Theft 2016069469 Theft WCSOP16028616 Phone 10/05/1616:12 Theft 2016069491 Theft WCSOP16028620 Phone 10/05/1616:12 Theft 2016069492 Theft WCSOP16028621 Phone 10/05/1617:55 Theft 2016069523 Theft WCSOP16028636 Phone 10/06/1615:16 Theft 2016069739 Theft WCSOP16028718 Phone 10/08/1613:48 Theft 2016070216 Theft WCSOP16028906 Phone 10/09/1611:33 Theft 2016070437 Theft WCSOP16028992 Phone 10/09/1618:22 Theft 2016070503 Theft WCSOP16029019 Phone 10/12/1616:32 Theft 2016071242 Theft WCSOP16029295 Phone 10/13/16 17:30 Theft 2016071494 Theft - From Vehicle WCSOP16029411 Phone ZUERCHER Page 16 of 23 Incident Start Date /Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Theft - Shoplifting Case Number How Reported 10/14/1616:43 Theft 2016071748 Theft WCSOP16029009 Phone WCSOP16029504 Phone 10/19/16 07:43 Theft 2016072855 Theft 10/11/16 17:16 Theft - Shoplifting; WCSOSR016029960 Theft - Shoplifting 10/21/1613:57 Theft 2016073479 Theft 2016072378 WCSOP16030198 Phone 10/24/1617:18 Theft 2016074253 Theft WCSOP16029827 911 WCSOP16030484 Phone 10/26/1615:38 Theft 2016074717 Theft WCSOP16030657 Phone 10/26/1617:43 Theft 2016074750 Theft WCSOP16030675 Phone 10/27/1613:23 Theft 2016074932 Theft WCSOP16030724 Phone 10/27/16 23:03 Theft 2016075074 Theft WCSOP16030786 911 10/29/16 11:10 Theft; Fraud - Forgery 2016075484 Fraud - Checks - Cards WCSOP16030953 Phone 10/29/1619:03 Theft 2016075579 Theft WCSOP16030985 Phone 10/31/16 00:01 Theft 2016075900 Theft WCSOP16031124 Phone 10/31/1611:55 Theft 2016075995 Theft WCSOP16031167 Phone 10/31/1614:56 Theft 2016076026 Theft WCSOP16031189 Phone Theft - From Vehicle Total: 2 10/05/16 17:24 Theft - From Vehicle 2016069515 Theft - From Vehicle WCSOP16028628 911 10/10/16 18:53 Theft - From Vehicle 2016070749 Theft - From Vehicle WCSOP16029112 Phone Theft - Gas Drive Off Total: 16 10/02/16 13:01 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2016068693 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP16028308 911 10/07/16 16:33 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2016069989 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP16028815 911 10/11/16 15:56 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2016070970 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP16029187 911 10/15/16 12:43 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2016071956 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP16029598 911 10/16/16 10:39 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2016072154 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP16029682 911 10/17/16 16:50 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2016072455 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP16029815 911 10/18/16 08:36 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2016072597 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP16029872 911 10/19/16 17:54 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2016073030 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP16030033 911 10/22/16 12:10 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2016073707 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP16030279 911 10/25/16 12:45 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2016074432 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP16030555 911 10/26/16 09:51 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2016074631 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP16030629 911 10/26/16 10:46 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2016074644 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP16030634 911 10/28/16 05:46 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2016075132 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP16030797 911 10/28/16 05:59 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2016075133 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP16030798 911 10/28/16 06:17 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2016075134 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP16030799 911 10/29/16 06:20 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2016075443 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP16030929 911 Theft - Identity Theft Total: 3 10/04/16 14:50 Theft - Identity Theft 2016069227 Theft - Identity Theft WCSOP16028526 Phone 10/07/16 12:37 Theft - Identity Theft 2016069941 Fraud - Checks WCSOP16028796 Phone 10/12/16 14:08 Theft - Identity Theft 2016071200 Fraud - Financial Transaction WCSOP16029275 Phone Theft - Shoplifting Total: 8 10/09/16 10:47 Theft - Shoplifting 2016070431 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP16028991 911 10/09/16 16:11 Theft - Shoplifting 2016070473 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP16029009 Phone 10/11/16 00:42 Theft - Shoplifting 2016070823 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP16029137 911 10/11/16 17:16 Theft - Shoplifting; 2016070994 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP16029198 Phone 10/17/16 11:46 Theft - Shoplifting 2016072378 Phone 10/17/16 19:07 Theft - Shoplifting 2016072493 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP16029827 911 ZUERCHER Page 17 of 23 Incident Start Date /Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 10/19/16 23:39 Theft - Shoplifting 2016073092 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP16030055 911 10/28/16 14:51 Theft - Shoplifting 2016075223 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP16030828 Phone Threats Total: 5 Traffic - Complaint 2016069703 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP16028705 10/01/1613:40 Threats 2016068427 Threats WCSOP16028197 Phone 10/02/16 23:57 Threats 2016068819 Threats WCSOP16028361 Phone 10/11/16 22:39 Threats 2016071074 Threats WCSOP16029232 Phone 10/14/16 00:09 Threats 2016071590 Threats WCSOP16029443 911 10/24/1616:48 Threats 2016074244 Harassment WCSOP16030480 Phone Traffic - Complaint Total: 20 10/01/16 15:38 Traffic - Complaint 2016068455 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP16028207 Phone 10/01/16 20:31 Traffic - Complaint 2016068535 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP16028248 Phone 10/04/16 20:16 Traffic - Complaint 2016069316 10/01/16 18:03 Traffic Stop Phone 10/06/16 12:23 Traffic - Complaint 2016069703 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP16028705 Phone 10/07/16 23:49 Traffic - Complaint 2016070093 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP16028859 Phone 10/08/16 11:01 Traffic - Complaint 2016070184 Traffic Stop WCSOP16028275 Officer Phone 10/10/16 15:22 Traffic - Complaint 2016070686 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP16029089 Phone 10/12/16 17:54 Traffic - Complaint 2016071262 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP16029306 Phone 10/14/16 19:56 Traffic - Complaint 2016071800 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP16029527 911 10/15/16 20:31 Traffic - Complaint 2016072044 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP16029633 Phone 10/16/16 18:45 Traffic - Complaint 2016072251 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP16029734 Phone 10/17/16 19:17 Traffic - Complaint 2016072499 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP16029829 Phone 10/22/16 17:16 Traffic - Complaint 2016073774 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP16030309 Phone 10/22/16 17:41 Traffic - Complaint 2016073781 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP16030313 911 10/22/16 18:16 Traffic - Complaint 2016073795 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP16030316 911 10/23/16 00:29 Traffic - Complaint 2016073884 DUI WCSOP16030353 Phone 10/25/16 13:38 Traffic - Complaint 2016074443 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP16030560 Phone 10/28/16 23:09 Traffic - Complaint 2016075388 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP16030903 911 10/29/16 02:43 Traffic - Complaint 2016075421 DUI WCSOP16030915 911 10/29/16 13:07 Traffic - Complaint 2016075507 Check Welfare WCSOP16030966 Phone Traffic Stop Total: 170 10/01/16 07:55 Traffic Stop 2016068383 Officer 10/01/16 14:16 Traffic Stop 2016068435 Officer 10/01/16 14:48 Traffic Stop 2016068444 Officer 10/01/16 18:03 Traffic Stop 2016068495 Officer 10/01/16 18:08 Traffic Stop 2016068496 Officer 10/01/16 22:28 Traffic Stop 2016068571 Traffic Stop WCSOP16028258 Officer 10/02/16 01:21 Traffic Stop 2016068612 Traffic Stop WCSOP16028275 Officer 10/02/16 02:11 Traffic Stop 2016068617 Officer 10/02/16 09:20 Traffic Stop 2016068652 Officer 10/02/16 16:21 Traffic Stop 2016068730 Officer 10/03/16 12:45 Traffic Stop 2016068933 Officer 10/03/16 12:57 Traffic Stop 2016068934 Officer 10/03/16 13:15 Traffic Stop 2016068938 Officer 10/03/16 21:07 Traffic Stop 2016069060 Officer 10/04/16 15:33 Traffic Stop 2016069235 Traffic Stop WCSOP16028533 Officer ZUERCHER Page 18 of 23 Incident Start Date /Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 10/04/16 16:10 Traffic Stop 2016069253 Officer 10/05/16 04:48 Traffic Stop 2016069371 Traffic Stop WCSOP16028581 Officer 10/05/16 06:07 Traffic Stop 2016069377 Officer 10/05/16 15:08 Traffic Stop 2016069464 Officer 10/06/16 00:21 Traffic Stop 2016069607 Officer 10/06/16 01:16 Traffic Stop 2016069619 Officer 10/06/16 18:08 Traffic Stop 2016069789 Officer 10/06/16 23:52 Traffic Stop 2016069853 Traffic Stop WCSOP16028760 Officer 10/07/16 00:16 Traffic Stop 2016069857 Officer 10/07/16 00:36 Traffic Stop 2016069858 Officer 10/07/16 00:54 Traffic Stop 2016069862 Officer 10/07/16 01:08 Traffic Stop 2016069865 Officer 10/07/16 01:24 Traffic Stop 2016069867 Traffic Stop WCSOP16028763 Officer 10/07/16 13:06 Traffic Stop 2016069948 Traffic Stop WCSOSRO16028800 Officer 10/07/16 14:16 Traffic Stop 2016069961 Officer 10/08/16 00:38 Traffic Stop 2016070106 Officer 10/08/16 01:18 Traffic Stop 2016070114 10/08/16 03:15 Traffic Stop 2016070136 Officer 10/08/16 07:50 Traffic Stop 2016070156 Traffic Stop WCSOP16028880 Officer 10/09/16 00:35 Traffic Stop 2016070360 Officer 10/09/16 00:36 Traffic Stop 2016070361 Officer 10/09/16 01:08 Traffic Stop 2016070363 Officer 10/09/16 02:01 Traffic Stop 2016070370 Traffic Stop WCSOP16028963 Officer 10/10/16 00:24 Traffic Stop 2016070575 Officer 10/10/16 00:57 Traffic Stop 2016070579 Traffic Stop WCSOP16029044 Officer 10/10/16 11:42 Traffic Stop 2016070650 Officer 10/10/16 16:29 Traffic Stop 2016070711 Officer 10/10/16 17:06 Traffic Stop 2016070724 Traffic Stop WCSOP16029096 Officer 10/10/16 17:38 Traffic Stop 2016070732 Officer 10/11/16 16:15 Traffic Stop 2016070973 Officer 10/11/16 21:44 Traffic Stop 2016071057 Officer 10/11/16 22:08 Traffic Stop 2016071065 Officer 10/12/16 01:57 Traffic Stop 2016071105 Traffic Stop WCSOP16029240 Officer 10/12/16 10:23 Traffic Stop 2016071169 Officer 10/13/16 01:45 Traffic Stop 2016071336 Officer 10/13/16 12:43 Traffic Stop 2016071419 Officer 10/13/16 14:05 Traffic Stop 2016071438 Officer 10/13/16 20:06 Traffic Stop 2016071536 Officer 10/13/16 20:55 Traffic Stop 2016071544 Officer 10/14/16 02:36 Traffic Stop 2016071604 Officer 10/14/16 02:59 Traffic Stop 2016071606 Officer 10/14/16 09:19 Traffic Stop 2016071640 Officer 10/14/16 09:54 Traffic Stop 2016071650 Officer 10/14/16 11:36 Traffic Stop 2016071668 Traffic Stop WCSOP16029467 Officer 10/14/16 11:37 Traffic Stop 2016071670 Officer 10/14/16 16:32 Traffic Stop 2016071746 Traffic Stop WCSOP16029503 Officer 10/15/16 00:20 Traffic Stop 2016071864 Officer ZUERCHER Page 19 of 23 Incident Start Date /Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 10/15/16 00:46 Traffic Stop 2016071871 Officer 10/15/16 06:20 Traffic Stop 2016071902 Officer 10/15/16 08:19 Traffic Stop 2016071916 Officer 10/15/16 14:25 Traffic Stop 2016071971 Officer 10/15/16 18:08 Traffic Stop 2016072014 Officer 10/15/16 22:06 Traffic Stop 2016072065 Officer 10/16/16 01:40 Traffic Stop 2016072110 Officer 10/16/16 01:56 Traffic Stop 2016072113 Officer 10/16/16 10:04 Traffic Stop 2016072150 Officer 10/16/16 11:51 Traffic Stop 2016072165 Officer 10/16/16 13:51 Traffic Stop 2016072184 Officer 10/17/16 00:58 Traffic Stop 2016072304 Traffic Stop WCSOP16029758 Officer 10/17/16 01:55 Traffic Stop 2016072313 Officer 10/17/16 11:45 Traffic Stop 2016072377 Officer 10/17/16 11:51 Traffic Stop 2016072381 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP16029782 Officer 10/17/16 18:18 Traffic Stop 2016072482 Officer 10/17/16 23:33 Traffic Stop 2016072550 Officer 10/17/16 23:43 Traffic Stop 2016072552 Officer 10/18/16 05:04 Traffic Stop 2016072581 Officer 10/18/16 06:59 Traffic Stop 2016072591 Officer 10/18/16 15:12 Traffic Stop 2016072684 Officer 10/18/16 21:04 Traffic Stop 2016072780 Officer 10/18/16 23:36 Traffic Stop 2016072809 Officer 10/19/16 00:03 Traffic Stop 2016072814 Officer 10/19/16 00:31 Traffic Stop 2016072819 Officer 10/19/16 00:32 Traffic Stop 2016072820 Officer 10/19/16 01:13 Traffic Stop 2016072827 Officer 10/19/16 01:21 Traffic Stop 2016072828 Officer 10/19/16 01:32 Traffic Stop 2016072830 Traffic Stop WCSOP16029952 Officer 10/19/16 08:10 Traffic Stop 2016072856 Officer 10/19/16 09:35 Traffic Stop 2016072870 Officer 10/19/16 11:27 Traffic Stop 2016072906 Training WCSOP16029974 Officer 10/19/16 12:37 Traffic Stop 2016072919 Drugs WCSOSIU16029981 Officer 10/19/16 15:53 Traffic Stop 2016072988 Officer 10/20/16 00:03 Traffic Stop 2016073097 Traffic Stop WCSOP16030059 Officer 10/20/16 00:35 Traffic Stop 2016073099 Officer 10/20/16 02:30 Traffic Stop 2016073118 Officer 10/20/16 09:35 Traffic Stop 2016073160 Officer 10/20/16 09:42 Traffic Stop 2016073162 Officer 10/20/16 23:50 Traffic Stop 2016073359 DUI WCSOP16030151 Officer 10/21/16 01:01 Traffic Stop 2016073370 Officer 10/21/16 05:58 Traffic Stop 2016073390 Officer 10/21/16 09:54 Traffic Stop 2016073426 Officer 10/21/16 13:09 Traffic Stop 2016073467 Officer 10/21/16 19:01 Traffic Stop 2016073546 Officer 10/21/16 20:58 Traffic Stop 2016073576 Officer 10/21/16 21:24 Traffic Stop 2016073583 Officer ZUERCHER Page 20 of 23 Incident Start Date /Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 10/21/16 23:15 Traffic Stop 2016073608 Officer 10/21/16 23:51 Traffic Stop 2016073618 Officer 10/22/16 17:37 Traffic Stop 2016073780 Traffic Stop WCSOP16030311 Officer 10/23/16 01:37 Traffic Stop 2016073894 DUI WCSOP16030360 Officer 10/23/16 09:54 Traffic Stop 2016073937 Officer 10/23/16 10:09 Traffic Stop 2016073942 Officer 10/23/16 13:37 Traffic Stop 2016073969 Officer 10/23/16 14:26 Traffic Stop 2016073982 Officer 10/23/16 16:04 Traffic Stop 2016074001 Officer 10/23/16 18:14 Traffic Stop 2016074034 Officer 10/23/16 19:48 Traffic Stop 2016074045 Officer 10/23/16 20:02 Traffic Stop 2016074049 Officer 10/23/16 21:19 Traffic Stop 2016074068 Officer 10/23/16 22:11 Traffic Stop 2016074078 Officer 10/24/16 00:06 Traffic Stop 2016074094 Officer 10/24/16 06:00 Traffic Stop 2016074125 Officer 10/24/16 09:56 Traffic Stop 2016074160 Officer 10/24/16 14:43 Traffic Stop 2016074205 Officer 10/24/16 22:35 Traffic Stop 2016074325 Officer 10/25/16 01:41 Traffic Stop 2016074347 Officer 10/25/16 17:37 Traffic Stop 2016074501 Officer 10/26/16 02:03 Traffic Stop 2016074589 Officer 10/26/16 02:35 Traffic Stop 2016074594 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP16030610 Officer 10/26/16 14:38 Traffic Stop 2016074693 Officer 10/26/16 16:14 Traffic Stop 2016074729 Officer 10/26/16 16:22 Traffic Stop 2016074733 Officer 10/26/16 20:42 Traffic Stop 2016074787 Officer 10/26/16 21:33 Traffic Stop 2016074796 Officer 10/26/16 21:52 Traffic Stop 2016074800 Officer 10/26/16 23:10 Traffic Stop 2016074815 Officer 10/27/16 00:56 Traffic Stop 2016074835 Officer 10/27/16 04:36 Traffic Stop 2016074853 Officer 10/27/16 08:20 Traffic Stop 2016074879 Officer 10/27/16 14:52 Traffic Stop 2016074954 Traffic Stop WCSOP16030735 Officer 10/27/16 15:11 Traffic Stop 2016074960 Traffic Stop WCSOP16030736 Officer 10/27/16 15:18 Traffic Stop 2016074964 Officer 10/27/16 17:09 Traffic Stop 2016074991 Officer 10/28/16 00:52 Traffic Stop 2016075092 Officer 10/28/16 01:32 Traffic Stop 2016075104 Traffic Stop WCSOP16030792 Officer 10/28/16 14:01 Traffic Stop 2016075209 Traffic Stop WCSOP16030825 Officer 10/28/16 22:32 Traffic Stop 2016075382 Officer 10/28/16 22:40 Traffic Stop 2016075386 Officer 10/29/16 01:42 Traffic Stop 2016075413 Officer 10/29/16 10:01 Traffic Stop 2016075469 Officer 10/29/16 11:13 Traffic Stop 2016075485 Officer 10/29/16 20:51 Traffic Stop 2016075614 Officer 10/29/16 21:26 Traffic Stop 2016075627 Officer ZUERCHER Page 21 of 23 Incident Start Date /Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 10/29/16 21:34 Traffic Stop 2016075630 Officer 10/29/16 21:36 Traffic Stop 2016075633 Officer 10/29/16 23:50 Traffic Stop 2016075669 Officer 10/29/16 23:50 Traffic Stop 2016075670 Officer 10/30/16 00:57 Traffic Stop 2016075682 Officer 10/30/16 02:01 Traffic Stop 2016075696 Officer 10/30/16 10:24 Traffic Stop 2016075736 Officer 10/30/16 13:17 Traffic Stop 2016075762 Traffic Stop WCSOP16031068 Officer 10/30/16 13:35 Traffic Stop 2016075768 Officer 10/30/16 22:39 Traffic Stop 2016075883 Officer 10/30/16 22:47 Traffic Stop 2016075885 Officer 10/30/16 22:53 Traffic Stop 2016075886 Officer 10/30/16 23:59 Traffic Stop 2016075899 Officer 10/31/16 03:05 Traffic Stop 2016075921 Traffic Stop WCSOP16031132 Officer Training Total: 1 2016074151 10/31/16 08:55 Training 2016075958 Warrant - Attempt Trespass Total: 3 10/06/1617:03 Trespass 2016069771 Trespass WCSOP16028733 Phone 10/12/16 23:06 Trespass 2016071317 Trespass WCSOP16029329 Phone 10/16/1616:09 Trespass 2016072214 Trespass WCSOP16029711 Phone Unwanted Person Total: 3 2016069691 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP16028698 Officer 10/07/16 01:33 Unwanted Person 2016069868 Unwanted Person WCSOP16028764 911 10/07/16 04:20 Unwanted Person 2016069877 Unwanted Person WCSOP16028766 Phone 10/31/16 08:52 Unwanted Person 2016075957 Unwanted Person WCSOP16031151 Phone Walk Away Total: 1 10/04/16 14:14 Walk Away 2016069212 Walk Away WCSOP16028521 Phone Warrant - Arrest Total: 3 10/18/16 13:50 Warrant - Arrest 2016072661 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP16029896 Officer 10/18/16 14:25 Warrant - Arrest 2016072670 Warrant - Arrest WCSOCID16029900 Officer 10/20/16 12:49 Warrant - Arrest 2016073193 Warrant - Attempt WCSOP16030087 Officer Warrant - Attempt Total: 15 10/01/16 17:48 Warrant - Attempt 2016068490 Officer 10/04/16 16:27 Warrant - Attempt 2016069262 Officer 10/04/16 17:53 Warrant - Attempt 2016069284 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP16028558 Officer 10/06/16 11:13 Warrant - Attempt 2016069691 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP16028698 Officer 10/08/16 09:41 Warrant - Attempt 2016070168 Officer 10/09/16 10:48 Warrant - Attempt 2016070432 Officer 10/13/16 12:27 Warrant - Attempt 2016071417 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP16029388 Officer 10/13/16 21:43 Warrant - Attempt 2016071561 10/17/16 20:46 Warrant - Attempt 2016072524 Officer 10/18/16 16:51 Warrant - Attempt 2016072714 Officer 10/24/16 09:03 Warrant - Attempt 2016074151 Officer 10/24/16 15:38 Warrant - Attempt 2016074226 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP16030476 Officer ZUERCHER Page 22 of 23 Incident Start Date /Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident 10/24/16 15:39 Warrant - Attempt 2016074229 10/25/16 15:23 Warrant - Attempt 2016074466 Drugs 10/28/16 21:11 Warrant - Attempt 2016075357 Total: 14 10/01/16 02:52 2016068361 10/03/16 18:51 2016069032 10/06/16 02:59 2016069634 10/07/16 02:16 2016069873 10/09/16 20:40 2016070534 10/14/16 21:35 2016071820 10/15/16 09:19 2016071924 10/18/16 12:42 2016072642 10/19/16 17:30 2016073024 10/20/16 13:54 2016073206 10/21/16 07:34 2016073408 Fire - Other 10/21/16 15:44 2016073502 10/24/16 19:29 2016074284 10/27/16 01:12 2016074841 Total Records: 863 Case Number WCSOP16030575 How Reported Officer Officer Officer 911 911 911 911 911 911 WCSOSRO16030169 911 911 ZUERCHER Page 23 of 23