Planning Commission Agenda 02-07-2017
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, February 7th, 2017 - 6:00 p.m.
Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center
Commissioners: Brad Fyle, Sam Murdoff, Marc Simpson, Lucas Wynne
Council Liaison: Charlotte Gabler
Staff: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), Jacob Thunander, John Rued
1. General Business
A. Call to Order
B. Consideration of approving minutes
a. Regular Meeting Minutes – January 3rd, 2017
C. Citizen Comments
D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda
2. Public Hearings
A. Public Hearing - Consideration of a request for amendment to Conditional Use
Permit for Development and Final Stage Planned Unit Development for multi-
tenant specialty dental facility in a B-4 (Regional Business) District
Applicant: bdh + young
B. Public Hearing – Consideration of adoption of the Monticello 2017 Official
Zoning Map
Applicant: City of Monticello
3. Regular Agenda
A. Consideration of a request for simple subdivision resulting in two buildable
parcels in the R-1 (Single-Family Residence) District to facilitate right of way for
7th Street/Fallon Avenue, per City Ordinance Title 11, Chapter 1, Section 7
Applicant: City of Monticello
B. Consideration for recommendation for appointment of Planning Commissioner
C. Consideration of the Community Development Directors Report
4. Added Items
5. Adjournment
Special Meeting
Academy Room - 5:30 PM
Planning Commission Vacancy Interviews
1
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, January 3rd, 2017 - 6:00 p.m.
Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center
Present: Brad Fyle, Linda Buchmann, Sam Murdoff, Marc Simpson
Absent: Lucas Wynne
Council Liaison: Charlotte Gabler
Staff: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), Jacob Thunander, John Rued
1. General Business
A. Call to Order
Brad Fyle called the regular meeting of the Monticello Planning Commission
to order at 6:00 p.m.
B. Consideration of approving minutes
a. Regular Meeting Minutes – December 6th, 2017
MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE REGULAR
MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 6TH, 2017. SAM MURDOFF
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0-1 WITH
LINDA BUCHMANN ABSTAINING.
C. Citizen Comments
None.
D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda
Brad Fyle added to the agenda the resignation of Planning Commissioner
Linda Buchmann.
2. Public Hearings
A. Public Hearing – Consideration of adoption of the Monticello 2017 Official
Zoning Map
Applicant: City of Monticello
Angela Schumann reminded the Planning Commission that each January they are
asked to review the zoning map to recognize rezoning amendments from the
previous year and to correct any errors. Changes to the Monticello Zoning Map
included: Ordinance No. 644 – Rezoning the Monticello Middle School plat
from A-0 to R-1; Ordinance No. 645 – Rezoning the Pinewood Elementary
parcels from A-0 to R-1; Ordinance No. 649 – Rezoning the Monticello High
School to Planned Unit Development; Ordinance No. 650 – Rezoning the Mills
Fleet Farm Plat from B-4 to Planned Unit Development; Ordinance No. 651 –
Rezoning from B-2 to Planned Unit Development for Lot 1, Block 2, Oakwood
Industrial Park (Red Rooster); Ordinance No. 655 - Rezoning from B-4 to B-3
for Camping World Plat parcel; and Ordinance No. 656 – Rezoning from B-4 to
B-3 for Lot 1, Block 1, 90th Street Addition (Moon Motors). No changes were
made to the Shoreland Overlay District.
2
SAM MURDOFF MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC-2017-001
RECOMMENDING THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 6XX FOR THE
2017 CITY OF MONTICELLO OFFICIAL ZONING MAP, INCLUDING
SHORELAND/FLOODPLAIN COMPANION MAP, BASED ON THE
FINDINGS IN SAID RESOLUTION. MARC SIMPSON SECONDED THE
MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 3-0-1 WITH LINDA BUCHMANN
ABSTAINING.
B. Public Hearing – Consideration to amend the Monticello Zoning Ordinance,
Chapters and Subsections as follows. Applicant: City of Monticello
Chapter 2, Section 4(F) – Site Plan Applications
Chapter 3, Section 4(E) – R-1: Single Family Residence District
Chapter 3, Section 4(F) – R-2: Single and Two Family Residence
District
Chapter 4, Section 1(H) – Standards for Site Landscaping
Chapter 4, Section 1(J) – Zoning District Specific Landscaping
Standards
Chapter 4, Section 5(J) – District Regulations
Chapter 4, Section 8(E) – Standards Applicable to All Uses
Chapter 5, Section 2(D) – Regulations for Civic and Institutional Uses
Chapter 5, Section 2(F) – Regulations for Commercial Uses
Chapter 5, Section 3(B) – General Standards and Limitations for
Accessory Uses and Structures
Chapter 5, Section 4(E) - Specific Standards for Temporary Uses
Chapter 8, Section 2(B) – Lots
Chapter 8, Section 4(B) – Lots (Definitions)
Angela Schumann presented a series of ‘housekeeping’ zoning ordinance
amendments that were either errors in the text or inconsistencies between specific
sections of code. These proposed changes have been collected over the past year
and were detailed by Schumann:
Chapter 2, Section 4(F) – Site Plan Applications
Site plan applications are not identified by Minnesota State Statute for
municipal planning. City Staff suggested changing the wording to be a
“submittal”, rather than an “application”. Schumann stated that site plan
review occurs with or prior to the issuance of a building permit
Chapter 4, Section 1(H) – Standards for Site Landscaping
Table 4-4 was proposed to require that tree plantings occur in the
boulevard consistent with City Ordinance 8-3.
Also suggested was the elimination of evergreen trees in the boulevard or
the immediate area for “Single-family Detached and Multi-Family
Dwellings with Less than 5 Units” and the “T-N District”. This proposal
was included because of sight line concerns with evergreen trees.
3
Schumann added the location of canopy trees in the boulevard was
consistent with past policy and practice of creating a canopy over streets.
An amendment to strike the language in the T-N District table was also
proposed. Currently, Section 1(H) and Section 1(J) are not consistent in
their requirements and the proposed amendment would correct this error.
A similar change would occur for the CCD and IBC District.
Chapter 4, Section 1(J) – Zoning District Specific Landscaping Standards
Schumann proposed adding tree plantings in the front and side yards for
the T-N District. The option for planting evergreens was also eliminated.
Chapter 4, Section 5(J) – District Regulations
The proposed amendments are intended to avoid content-based regulation
associated with “identification” or “directional” signs. The language in the
section was proposed to keep current sign allowances in terms of number
and size and to maintain consistency with other terms in code.
Residential monument signs have been clarified for their location and
timing of the construction.
Civic and institutional allowances also amended to eliminate the
identification reference.
Directional signs were proposed to be stricken in their entirety by
removing the title and inserting the language in the provisions for free-
standing signs. Height, display limitations, and setback regulations were
also proposed.
Chapter 5, Section 2(D) – Regulations for Civic and Institutional Uses
Civic and Institutional Uses are allowed two signs, but they must be
consistent with monument sign regulations.
Chapter 4, Section 8(E) – Standards Applicable to All Uses
Proposed to remove parking on unimproved surfaces expect as specifically
allowed by ordinance.
Brad Fyle asked if any new regulations to off-street parking would be
changed with the proposals. Schumann declined stating that was governed
by a separate off-street parking regulation identified in the zoning
ordinance. She referenced a table which provides the allowable parking
areas for vehicles.
Chapter 4, Section 8(E) – Standards Applicable to All Uses & Chapter 8,
Section 4(B) – Lots (Definitions)
Schumann suggested adding “Pre-” to the current text regulation for “K-12
Educational Institutions” as it reflects the changing educational system. A
4
corresponding alteration to the table and definitions section would be
included.
In addition, a clause would be added for buildings and structures to
comply with all required building codes when modifications occur to
accommodate early childhood functions.
Chapter 5, Section 2(F) – Regulations for Commercial Uses
City code state that “convenience retail” can operate from 6 a.m. to 9 p.m.
The proposed amendment would allow convenience retail beyond the
hours of 6 a.m. and 9 p.m. with Conditional Use Permit. Schumann stated
this would allow the City to consider conditions which relate to land use
impacts.
Table 5-4 was proposed to eliminate the graphic symbols with text.
Chapter 5, Section 3(B) – General Standards and Limitations for
Accessory Uses and Structures
This proposal included clarifying detached accessory structure could be
located in side or rear yards, but behind the front line of the principle
building. An exemption to commercial canopies and signs was also
proposed.
Chapter 5, Section 4(E) - Specific Standards for Temporary Uses
An amendment would ensure that Table 5-6 would be consistent with
Chapter 4, Section 5 for temporary sign duration of 120 days per calendar
year.
Chapter 8, Section 2(B) – Lots
To be consistent with Chapter 5, Section 3, it was proposed to add
detached accessory structures to be allowed in side yards, if they are
behind the front line of the principal structure and meet the other
requirements of Chapter 5, Section 3 (B)(3).
Schumann also stated that Staff believed that these amendments corrected errors
with the zoning ordinance, addressed the needs arising from changing conditions,
and were consistent with achieving the goals and objectives outlined in the
comprehensive plan.
SAM MURDOFF MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. PC-2017-002, A
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF THE PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE BASED ON A FINDING
THAT SUCH AMENDMENTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY’S
LONG-TERM LAND USE GOALS AND OTHER STATED FINDINGS IN
SAID RESOLUTION. LINDA BUCHMANN SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED, 4-0.
3. Regular Agenda
5
A. Consideration of a Review of the Special Use Overlay District
Steve Grittman, NAC explained the purpose of the Special Use Overlay
District defined in the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. The ordinance takes an
approach to regulate adult-oriented uses and ensure there are eligible parcels
for these types of businesses to locate in the city. City Staff, including the City
Attorney, believe that the current ordinance and map meet this requirement.
With recent development and land use changes, Grittman stated that staff
evaluated this area again to ensure adult-oriented uses could be
accommodated. Grittman stated that in review there have been very little
changes affecting the overlay area in the past year and that the same amount
of parcels were available for adult-oriented uses from the previous review.
Grittman stated that no action was required if the Planning Commission was
comfortable with no changes to the ordinance or map. The Planning
Commission was in consensus for the Special Use Overlay District to remain
the same.
B. Consideration to Appoint 2017 Planning Commission Officers
SAM MURDOFF MOVED TO NOMINATE COMMISSIONER BRAD
FYLE AS CHAIR OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR 2017. LINDA
BUCHMANN SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 4-0.
MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO NOMINATE COMMISSIONER SAM
MURDOFF AS VICE CHAIR OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR
2017. LINDA BUCHMANN SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION
CARRIED, 4-0.
Angela Schumann stated that staff typically serves as Secretary by recording
the minutes and keeping record of the agenda. The Planning Commission
unanimously agreed to have staff serve as Secretary.
C. Consideration to appoint a representative to the Downtown Small Area
Study Steering Committee.
Angela Schumann stated the EDA had selected the Cuningham Group to
complete the Downtown Small Area Study. They would like to gather a group
of people to serve on a steering committee to help guide the plan. The steering
committee would meet three to four times with a timeline for completion in
May, 2017. Schumann stated that staff was requested to bring forth a member
from the Planning Commission to participate on the steering committee.
Marc Simpson asked what the plan hoped to accomplish. Schumann stated
that the plan would review the previous downtown study and create an
updated land use plan for the defined area.
SAM MURDOFF MOVED TO NOMINATE COMMISSIONER MARC
SIMPSON AS THE PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE FOR
THE DOWNTOWN SMALL AREA STUDY STEERING COMMITTEE.
6
LINDA BUCHMANN SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED,
4-0.
D. Consideration of the Community Development Directors Report
The Planning Commission had no questions regarding the Director’s Report.
4. Added Items
A. Resignation of Commissioner Linda Buchmann
Brad Fyle thanked Planning Commissioner Linda Buchmann for her time and
service on the board.
Angela Schumann noted that the open position would be posted until January 30th
and consideration for approval could be held during the February meeting.
Previous applicants would be notified of the opening and the opportunity to apply
again.
SAM MURDOFF MOVED TO APPROVE THE RESIGNATION OF
PLANNING COMMISSIONER LINDA BUCHMANN. MARC SIMPSON
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 4-0.
5. Adjournment
SAM MURDOFF MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 6:42 P.M. LINDA
BUCHMANN SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 4-0.
Recorder: Jacob Thunander ____
Approved: February 7, 2016
Attest: ____________________________________________
Angela Schumann, Community Development Director
Planning Commission Agenda – 02/07/2017
1
2A. Public Hearing – Public Hearing - Consideration of a request for amendment to
Conditional Use Permit for Development and Final Stage Planned Unit
Development for multi-tenant specialty dental facility in a B-4 (Regional
Business) District. Applicant: bdh + young (NAC)
Property:Legal: Lot 2, Block 1, Prairie Ponds
PID: 155-157-001020
Planning Case Number:2017-006
A.REFERENCE & BACKGROUND
Request(s):Planned Unit Development Approval for construction
of a medical office building on an existing parcel within
the Prairie Ponds PUD.
Deadline for Decision:March 27th, 2017 (60 days from complete application)
Land Use Designation:Places to Work
Zoning Designation:B-4, Regional Business
The purpose of the B-4, Regional Business District is to
provide for the establishment of commercial and
service activities which draw from and serve customers
from the entire community or region.
Overlays/Environmental NA
Regulations Applicable:
Current Site Use:Vacant
Surrounding Land Uses:
North:Stormwater Pond
East:Highway 25, Commercial
South:Commercial
West:Vacant (Commercial Zoning)
Project Description:The applicants propose to construct a medical office
building (proposed as a dental clinic) on an existing
parcel of 1.67 acres. The building is shown at 11,800
square feet, single story, at the east end of a parking lot
of 49 spaces with access to the Deegan Court cul-de-
sac. The building design includes a canopy that
partially extends over a drop-off driveway at the main
entrance.
Planning Commission Agenda – 02/07/2017
2
ANALYSIS
Ordinance Requirements:Within the B-4 District, Clinics and Medical Services
are Permitted Uses, with no additional referenced
conditions. As such, only the general provisions of the
ordinance apply to the proposal. The PUD adds no
additional requirements, as it was applied primarily to
accommodate a plat with a variety of frontage and lot
configurations. The B-4 District requires no setbacks,
with the note that parking lot setbacks must be at least 6
feet from property lines, and generally not located
within drainage and utility easements.
Parking.The building is proposed at 11,800 square feet in area. The zoning
ordinance requires one space per 250 square feet, for a total requirement of 47 spaces.
The applicants site plan shows 49 spaces, as well as a row of 19 future (proof of
parking) spaces along the north property boundary. As designed for current
construction, the parking lot will not raise issues for headlight glare to the north, and
no residential areas abut the property, although long views to residential areas are
open across the stormwater pond. The inclusion of the future parking on the current
plans should negate the need for future separate PUD amendment review of the
parking lot expansion, although engineering/stormwater review would be required in
any case.
Landscaping.The applicant has provided landscaping plans that show landscaping
areas in the parking lot islands, flanking the entrance driveway, and surrounding the
building. The code requires landscaping quantities based on lot size and building
perimeter. For this site, the total requirement is 2 evergreen trees and 16.7 caliper
inches of deciduous trees, with 88 shrubs. The applicant’s plans meet this
requirement, with 17.5 caliper inches of deciduous trees (5 overstory trees and 5
ornamental trees). Planning staff would note that if the parking area is added to the
north, it may be prudent to require a buffer for headlight glare along the boundary.
Due to the slope of the property, planting shrubs in this location now may mitigate
need for fencing or other screening in the future.
Lighting.A photometric plan has been submitted with the proposal. The purpose of
photometric review is to ensure that light glare does not impact neighboring
residential property or public rights of way. The proposed plan shows compliance
with the City’s requirements in this regard. Staff would note that the plans identify
site lighting as a “25 foot pole on a 3 foot base”. The requirements of the zoning
Planning Commission Agenda – 02/07/2017
3
ordinance are a maximum height of 25 feet. The applicant should verify that the plan
notes are consistent with this standard.
Signage.The plan includes signage information on the building architectural plans.
A monument sign is proposed to be located near the entrance drive to the site, with a
sign cabinet area of just over 12 square feet. The sign is set on a concrete and brick
base, with a total height of 4 feet, 10 inches. This is well within the allowances for
such signs, which could accommodate freestanding sign height of 22 feet, and 100
square of area in most cases.
In addition to the monument sign, the plans show building and tenant wall signage on
the front wall (west facing the parking lot) and rear wall (east facing Highway 25).
The plans do not detail the size of the wall signage. Scaling from the plans, planning
staff estimates a total sign area of approximately 140 square feet between the six sign
panels (three on each of the two wall facings). The zoning ordinance provides an
allowance for such signage of up to 15% of the area of the walls facing each public
street (up to 2 streets). In this case, the building façade area is more than 2,000
square feet along the Highway 25 exposure. This wall alone accommodates more
than 300 square feet of wall sign area. As such, the plan is well within the limits of
the ordinance.
Building Design.The applicants propose a building of one story, with an average
height of approximately 16 feet, and a varying parapet wall height that extends up to
22 feet at its highest. The building materials include concrete masonry block along
the base wainscot, with the primary building exterior of EFIS (Exterior Finish
Insulating System) – a stucco-like commercial building material. The building also
uses metal accents, and glass. All materials are consistent with the City’s zoning
requirements.
Access and Circulation.The building gains its vehicular access from Deegan Court.
Staff has discussed pedestrian access through or around the site, but because future
pedestrian access to the north is uncertain at this time, due to grading and other
factors, no pedestrian facilities are recommended by staff with this project.
Utilities, Grading and Drainage.The City Engineer is reviewing the project for
these aspects, and has included a separate report which is incorporated here by
reference.
Trash Handling.The trash handling enclosure is located in the northwest corner of
the site, with access from the parking lot. The site is consistent with code
requirements, and the facility itself is identified as “heavy duty concrete”, although
Planning Commission Agenda – 02/07/2017
4
detail is necessary to confirm the materials. Staff would recommend that the
materials are consistent with those used in the principal building.
B.ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
Decision 1: Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC-2017-003, recommending
approval of the amendment to PUD for Monticello Specialty Clinic, Prairie
Ponds.
1.Motion to approve Resolution #PC-2017-003 recommending approval of the
amendment to Prairie Ponds PUD, contingent on compliance with the findings
in said resolution and those conditions specified in Exhibit Z.
2.Motion to deny Resolution #PC-2017-003 recommending for a PUD, based
on findings to be made by the Planning Commission.
3.Motion to table action on the request, pending additional information as
identified by the Planning Commission and staff report.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the PUD, with the comments noted in Exhibit Z. The
facility is consistent with the requirements of the zoning ordinance, and is an
otherwise permitted use in the district.
D. SUPPORTING DATA
A.Resolution # PC-2017-003
B.Aerial Image, Subject Site
C.Project Narrative
D.Plan Set, including:
a.Title Sheet
b.Survey
c.Site Plan
d.Grading Plan
e.SWPPP
f.Utility Plan
g.Site Details
h.Lighting Plan
i.Landscape Plan
j.Preliminary Floor Plan
k.Preliminary Elevations
l.Revised Elevations
E. City Engineer’s Letter, dated February 1st, 2017
Z.Conditions of Approval
Planning Commission Agenda – 02/07/2017
5
EXHIBIT Z
Monticello Specialty Clinic
PUD Amendment
Deegan Court
Lot 2, Block 1, Prairie Ponds
.
1.Verification of sign areas as consistent with the zoning ordinance.
2.Revise lighting plan to demonstrate compliance with light pole height requirements.
3.Provide shrub plantings along the north boundary to screen future parking expansion.
4.Verify trash enclosure materials will match building materials, consistent with code
requirements.
5.Compliance with the terms and conditions of the City Engineer’s report, dated
February 1st, 2017.
6.The applicant enter into a development agreement or proceedings for the amendment
to PUD for Prairie Ponds.
7.Comments of other City Staff.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. PC-2017-003
Motion By: Seconded By:
RECOMENDING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT AND FINAL STAGE
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A SPECIALTY CLINIC
AT LOT 2, BLOCK 1, PRAIRIE PONDS ADDITION
WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted an application for approval of a Development/Final
Stage PUD to construct a specialty clinic building on an existing platted parcel; and
WHEREAS, the property in question is guided for institutional uses under the “Places to Shop”
category in the Monticello Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the property in question is zoned B-4, Regional Business, in which such clinics are
permitted uses; and
WHEREAS, the property is subject to a Conditional Use Permit PUD, Planned Unit
Development imposed at the time of the initial platting of the parcel; and
WHEREAS, the proposed development is consistent with the requirements of the applicable
zoning regulations; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project will meet the goals and policies of the Monticello
Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 7th, 2017 on the
application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present
information to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report,
which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello hereby makes the following
Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval:
1. The proposed project complies with the intent of the use of Planned Unit Development,
and the original approvals granted to the subject PUD, in order to further the objectives
for the area within the City Comprehensive Plan.
2. With conditions, Development and Final Stage PUD plans meet all applicable
requirements of the City’s Zoning Ordinance.
3. The addition of clinic buildings and uses in the subject area is consistent with the City’s
development objectives.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello
City Council approves the Rezoning and Development Stage PUD, subject to the conditions
listed in Exhibit Z as follows:
1. Verification of sign areas as consistent with the zoning ordinance.
2. Revise lighting plan to demonstrate compliance with light pole height requirements.
3. Provide shrub plantings along the north boundary to screen future parking expansion.
4. Verify trash enclosure materials will match building materials, consistent with code
requirements.
5. Compliance with the terms and conditions of the City Engineer’s report, dated February
1st, 2017.
6. The applicant enter into a development agreement or proceedings for the amendment to
PUD for Prairie Ponds.
7. Comments of other City Staff.
ADOPTED this 7th day of February, 2017, by the Planning Commission of the City
of Monticello, Minnesota.
MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
By: _______________________________
Brad Fyle, Chair
ATTEST:
____________________________________________
Angela Schumann, Community Development Director
bdh + you ng - R equ est for Amend men t to Co nd ition al Use Permit
Lot 2, Block 1, Prairie Ponds | PID #155157001020
C reated by : C ity of Monticello
385 ft
www.bdhyoung.com
7001 France Avenue South
Suite 200
Edina, Minnesota 55435
p 952.893.9020
f 952.893.9299
Monticello Specialty Clinic Building
Project Narrative:
The proposed Monticello Specialty Clinic Building is a multi-tenant 11,800 square foot single story steel framed facility
located on a 1.67 acre site in the Prairie Ponds development. The site design includes 49 parking spaces with an additional
19 proof of parking spaces available for future expansion. The stormwater design includes a perforated storm vault system
located below the parking lot to accommodate the required stormwater infiltration rates.
The building design is a single story building with a flat roof and varying parapet heights. The building materials consist of
brick, EIFS, CMU, anodized aluminum framed windows, and composite metal canopy and accent cornice elements. The mix
of materials are used around the entire structure to create interest and rhythms along all four building façades. The roof
line has varied heights with the introduction of metal cornice elements. The canopy provides covered drop off and pick up
for patients and family members as well as metro mobility type vehicles. Landscaping is designed to complement the
building architecture. The roof top mechanical unit will be fully screened with a corrugated metal enclosure of color to
match the building materials. The trash enclosure located on the NW corner of the site will be constructed of materials
matching the building construction.
The building is designed as a multi-tenant specialty dental facility with primary business hours of 7:00 AM – 6:00 PM
Monday through Friday with some weekend hours possible. The building is scheduled to begin construction in the spring of
2017 with completion by late summer of 2017.
CONTACT LIST
BUILDING OWNER
DAVIS SERVICES REAL ESTATE GROUP
222 SOUTH 9TH STREET
SUITE 3255
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402
MARK DAVIS
EMAIL: MDAVIS@DAVISREALESTATEMN.COM
PHONE: 612.341.3242
ARCHITECT
BDH+YOUNG SPACE DESIGN
7001 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH
SUITE 200
EDINA, MN 55435
PATRICK J. GIORDANA, AIA
EMAIL: PGIORDANA@BDHYOUNG.COM
PHONE: 952-345-8306
CIVIL ENGINEER
LOUCKS
7200 HEMLOCK LANE, SUITE 300
MAPLE GROVE, MN 55369
PJ DISCH P.E.
EMAIL: PDISCH@LOUCKSINC.COM
PHONE: 763.424.5505
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
BRODSHO CONSULTING
698 NORTHBRIDGE COURT
EAGAN, MN 55123
DEBRA BRODSHO
EMAIL: DBRODSHO@AOL.COM
PHONE: 651.688.8023
7001 France Avenue South, Suite 200,
Edina, Minnesota 55435
952-893-9020 fax 952-893-9299
www.bdhyoung.com
Project Information
«=_ae=C=vçìåÖ=pé~ÅÉ=
Sheet Title
Sheet Information
Job Code
Drawn By Reviewed By
DateD:\2017 Revit Local\A17-Davis_MontMB_mnafe@bdhyoung.com.rvt1/10/2017 2:49:31 PMjlkqf`biil
pmb`f^iqv=`ifkf`
jlkqf`biil
uIuuu=pc
qMKM
^Ja^sfpjlkq
qfqib=pebbq
uuLuuLuuuu
hjc ae
jlkqf`biil
jlkqf`biil
PRELIMINARY SHEET INDEX
Sheet Number Sheet Name PRELIMINARYBID & PERMITFINAL SETTITLE
0.0 - GENERAL
T0.0 TITLE SHEET
CIVIL
C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS
C2-1 SITE PLAN
C3-1 GRADING PLAN
C3-2 SWPPP
C3-3 SWPPP NOTES
C4-1 SITE UTILITY PLAN
C8-1 SITE DETAILS
SL-1 SITE LIGHTING PLAN
LANDSCAPE
0.0 - GENERAL
L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN
PRELIMINARY
PP02 PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLAN
PP03 PRELIMINARY ELEVATIONS
12/21/16 CITY SUBMITTAL
Review Date
SHEET INDEX
License No.
Date
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the
laws of the State of Minnesota.
PJ Disch - PE
49933
Project Lead
Drawn By
Checked By
Loucks Project No.16528A
PJD
SRT
PJD
X
X
LOUCKS
W:\2016\16528A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C1-1Plotted: 12 /21 / 2016 1:59 PM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300
Maple Grove, MN 55369
763.424.5505
www.loucksinc.com
PLANNING
CIVIL ENGINEERING
LAND SURVEYING
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS
PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE
QUALITY CONTROL
CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are
instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely
with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used
on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion
of this project by others without written approval by the
Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be
permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for
information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional
revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be
made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions
or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the
Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities.
CADD QUALIFICATION
MONTICELLO
DENTAL
MONTICELLO, MN
THE DAVIS GROUP
222 SOUTH 9TH STREET, SUITE 3255
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402
C1-1
C2-1
C3-1
C3-2
C3-3
C4-1
C8-1
EXISTING CONDITIONS
SITE PLAN
GRADING PLAN
SWPPP
SWPPP NOTES
SITE UTILITY PLAN
SITE DETAILS
N
EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN
THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE
STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE
WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002
MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES.
OWNER.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL
WARNING:
AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND
Gopher State One Call
13
EXISTING
CONDITIONS
C1-1
12/21/16 CITY SUBMITTAL
Review Date
SHEET INDEX
License No.
Date
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the
laws of the State of Minnesota.
PJ Disch - PE
49933
Project Lead
Drawn By
Checked By
Loucks Project No.16528A
PJD
SRT
PJD
X
X
LOUCKS
W:\2016\16528A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C2-1Plotted: 12 /21 / 2016 2:0 PM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300
Maple Grove, MN 55369
763.424.5505
www.loucksinc.com
PLANNING
CIVIL ENGINEERING
LAND SURVEYING
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS
PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE
QUALITY CONTROL
CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are
instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely
with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used
on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion
of this project by others without written approval by the
Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be
permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for
information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional
revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be
made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions
or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the
Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities.
CADD QUALIFICATION
MONTICELLO
DENTAL
MONTICELLO, MN
THE DAVIS GROUP
222 SOUTH 9TH STREET, SUITE 3255
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402
C1-1
C2-1
C3-1
C3-2
C3-3
C4-1
C8-1
EXISTING CONDITIONS
SITE PLAN
GRADING PLAN
SWPPP
SWPPP NOTES
SITE UTILITY PLAN
SITE DETAILS
N
EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN
THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE
STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE
WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002
MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES.
OWNER.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL
WARNING:
AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND
SITE PLAN LEGEND
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
Gopher State One Call
CONCRETE PAVEMENT
HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
23
CURRENT ZONING:B-4
PARKING SETBACK: 6 FT.
BUILDING SETBACK:0 FT.
PROPERTY AREA:1.668 AC
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA:0.000 AC. (0.00%)
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA:1.042 AC (62.5%)
SITE DATA
SITE NOTES
1.ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER THE DETAIL SHEET(S) AND STATE/LOCAL
JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS.
2.ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL BE PROVIDED PER CURRENT ADA
STANDARDS AND LOCAL/STATE REQUIREMENTS.
3.ALL CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
4.ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
5.TYPICAL FULL SIZED PARKING STALL IS 9' X20' WITH A 24' WIDE TWO WAY DRIVE UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
6.ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 3.0' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
7.SEE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR SITE LIGHTING.
OFF-STREET PARKING CALCULATIONS
PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING: 4 STALLS
REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE PARKING: 3 STALLS**
**REQUIRED MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES FOR 51 TO 75STALLS
ACCESSIBLE PARKING
CITY REQUIREMENT:
4 STALLS PER 1,000 sf
TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED = 11,800/1,000 X 4 = 47 STALLS
PROPOSED SURFACE PARKING PROVIDED = 49 STALLS
PROPOSED SURFACE PROOF OF PARKING PROVIDED = 19 STALLS
PROPOSED TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED = 68 STALLS
SITE PLAN
C2-1
12/21/16 CITY SUBMITTAL
Review Date
SHEET INDEX
License No.
Date
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the
laws of the State of Minnesota.
PJ Disch - PE
49933
Project Lead
Drawn By
Checked By
Loucks Project No.16528A
PJD
SRT
PJD
X
X
LOUCKS
W:\2016\16528A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C3-1Plotted: 12 /21 / 2016 2:1 PM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300
Maple Grove, MN 55369
763.424.5505
www.loucksinc.com
PLANNING
CIVIL ENGINEERING
LAND SURVEYING
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS
PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE
QUALITY CONTROL
CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are
instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely
with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used
on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion
of this project by others without written approval by the
Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be
permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for
information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional
revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be
made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions
or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the
Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities.
CADD QUALIFICATION
MONTICELLO
DENTAL
MONTICELLO, MN
THE DAVIS GROUP
222 SOUTH 9TH STREET, SUITE 3255
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402
C1-1
C2-1
C3-1
C3-2
C3-3
C4-1
C8-1
EXISTING CONDITIONS
SITE PLAN
GRADING PLAN
SWPPP
SWPPP NOTES
SITE UTILITY PLAN
SITE DETAILS
N
EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN
THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE
STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE
WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002
MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES.
OWNER.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL
WARNING:
AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND
Gopher State One Call
23
GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL NOTES
1.SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES, GUTTER/FLOW LINE, FACE OF
BUILDING, OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2.CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH
BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.16 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS DO NOT
REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS.
3.ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES OF TOP SOIL AND
SEED/MULCH OR SOD. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED/MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL
VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED.
4.FOR SITE RETAINING WALLS "TW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT TOP FACE OF WALL (NOT TOP OF
WALL), "GW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT WALL GRADE TRANSITION, AND "BW" EQUALS SURFACE
GRADE AT BOTTOM FACE OF WALL (NOT BOTTOM OF BURIED WALL COURSES).
5.STREETS MUST BE CLEANED AND SWEPT WHENEVER TRACKING OF SEDIMENTS OCCURS AND
BEFORE SITES ARE LEFT IDLE FOR WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS. A REGULAR SWEEPING SCHEDULE MUST
BE ESTABLISHED.
6.DUST MUST BE ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED.
7.SEE SWPPP FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS.
8.SEE UTILITY PLANS FOR WATER, STORM AND SANITARY SEWER INFORMATION.
9.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND BITUMINOUS TAPER LOCATIONS.
10.SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR FINAL SITE STABILIZATION.
GRADING
PLAN
C3-1
12/21/16 CITY SUBMITTAL
Review Date
SHEET INDEX
License No.
Date
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the
laws of the State of Minnesota.
PJ Disch - PE
49933
Project Lead
Drawn By
Checked By
Loucks Project No.16528A
PJD
SRT
PJD
X
X
LOUCKS
W:\2016\16528A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C3-2&3Plotted: 12 /21 / 2016 2:2 PM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300
Maple Grove, MN 55369
763.424.5505
www.loucksinc.com
PLANNING
CIVIL ENGINEERING
LAND SURVEYING
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS
PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE
QUALITY CONTROL
CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are
instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely
with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used
on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion
of this project by others without written approval by the
Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be
permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for
information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional
revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be
made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions
or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the
Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities.
CADD QUALIFICATION
MONTICELLO
DENTAL
MONTICELLO, MN
THE DAVIS GROUP
222 SOUTH 9TH STREET, SUITE 3255
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402
C1-1
C2-1
C3-1
C3-2
C3-3
C4-1
C8-1
EXISTING CONDITIONS
SITE PLAN
GRADING PLAN
SWPPP
SWPPP NOTES
SITE UTILITY PLAN
SITE DETAILS
N
EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN
THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE
STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE
WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002
MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES.
OWNER.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL
WARNING:
AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND
Gopher State One Call
23
SITE PLAN LEGEND
SILT FENCE
INLET PROTECTION
EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN
PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERN
RECEIVING WATERS
NAME OF WATER
BODY
TYPE OF
WATER
BODY
SPECIAL
WATER
IMAIRED
WATER
PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
INFILTRATION
STORMWATER HARVEST AND REUSE
FILTRATION
WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN
ONSITE PONDING
ESTIMATED QUANTITIES
DESCRIPTION UNIT
TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA
SILT FENCE (STANDARD)LF
INLET PROTECTION EA
QUANTITY
1
! (%
7
TYPE OF
SPECIAL
WATER
WOODFIBER BLANKET SF %"
EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
SITE BOUNDARY
1 MILE BUFFER AREA
NO SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED WATERS WITHIN 1 MILE
X
SWPPP
C3-2
12/21/16 CITY SUBMITTAL
Review Date
SHEET INDEX
License No.
Date
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the
laws of the State of Minnesota.
PJ Disch - PE
49933
Project Lead
Drawn By
Checked By
Loucks Project No.16528A
PJD
SRT
PJD
X
X
LOUCKS
W:\2016\16528A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C3-2&3Plotted: 12 /21 / 2016 2:2 PM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300
Maple Grove, MN 55369
763.424.5505
www.loucksinc.com
PLANNING
CIVIL ENGINEERING
LAND SURVEYING
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS
PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE
QUALITY CONTROL
CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are
instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely
with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used
on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion
of this project by others without written approval by the
Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be
permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for
information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional
revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be
made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions
or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the
Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities.
CADD QUALIFICATION
MONTICELLO
DENTAL
MONTICELLO, MN
THE DAVIS GROUP
222 SOUTH 9TH STREET, SUITE 3255
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402
C1-1
C2-1
C3-1
C3-2
C3-3
C4-1
C8-1
EXISTING CONDITIONS
SITE PLAN
GRADING PLAN
SWPPP
SWPPP NOTES
SITE UTILITY PLAN
SITE DETAILS
1.PROJECT DESCRIPTION
THE NATURE OF THIS PROJECT WILL CONSIST OF CONSTRUCTING A BUILDING AND PARKING
LOT. UTILITY WORK NECESSARY FOR THE BUILDING AND DRAINAGE WILL ALSO BE
CONSTRUCTED.
2.SEQUENCING OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE AS FOLLOWS:
1.INSTALL VEHICLE TRACKING BMP
2.INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND SITE
3.INSTALL PROTECTIVE FENCE AROUND INFILTRATION AREAS
4.CLEAR AND GRUB SITE
5.STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL
6.REMOVE PAVEMENTS AND UTILITIES
7.CONSTRUCT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASINS
8.INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND BASINS
9.ROUGH GRADE SITE
10.IMPORT CLEAN FILL FOR REPLACEMENT AND BALANCE
11.INSTALL UTILITIES
12.INSTALL BUILDING FOUNDATIONS
13.INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER
14.INSTALL PAVEMENTS AND WALKS
15.FINAL GRADE SITE
16.REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM BASINS
17.CONSTRUCT INFILTRATION BASIN
18.SEED AND MULCH
19.WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED, REMOVE
SILT FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL.
3.SITE DATA:
AREA OF DISTURBANCE:H13
PRE-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA:H13
POST-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA:H13
GENERAL SOIL TYPE:-
4.THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED MUST BE IDENTIFIED WITH FLAGS, STAKES,
SIGNS, SILT FENCE, ETC. BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS.
5.ALL DISTURBED GROUND LEFT INACTIVE FOR SEVEN (7) OR MORE DAYS SHALL BE STABILIZED BY
SEEDING OR SODDING (ONLY AVAILABLE PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 15) OR BY MULCHING OR
COVERING OR OTHER EQUIVALENT CONTROL MEASURE. AT A RATE OF 1.5 TIMES STANDARD
SEEDING FINAL STABILIZATION TO BE DONE PER LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE SHEET L1-1.
6.ON SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER MAINTAIN SHEET FLOW AND MINIMIZE RILLS AND/OR GULLIES,
SLOPE LENGTHS CAN NOT BE GREATER THAN 75 FEET.
DENOTES SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1. ALL 3:1 SLOPES TO BE STABILIZED WITH EROSION
CONTROL BLANKET
7.ALL STORM DRAINS AND INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED UNTIL ALL SOURCES OF POTENTIAL
DISCHARGE ARE STABILIZED.
8.TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL AND CAN NOT BE
PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS OR STORM WATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS. TEMPORARY
STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF SILT, CLAY, OR ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ARE
EXEPMT EX: CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCK PILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND
STOCKPILES.
9.SEDIMENT LADEN WATER MUST BE DISCHARGED TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN WHENEVER
POSSIBLE. IF NOT POSSIBLE, IT MUST BE TREATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE BMP'S.
10.SOLID WASTE MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND MUST COMPLY WITH MPCA DISPOSAL
REQUIREMENTS.
11.THE WATERSHED DISTRICT OR THE CITY MAY HAVE REQUIREMENTS FOR INSPECTIONS OR
AS-BUILT DRAWINGS VERIFYING PROPER CONSTRUCTION OF THE BMPS.
12.THE OWNER WHO SIGNS THE NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION IS A PERMITTEE AND IS RESPONSIBLE
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT. THE OPERATOR
(CONTRACTOR) WHO SIGNS THE NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION IS A PERMITTEE FOR PARTS II.B.,
PART II.C, PART II.B-F, PART V, PART IV AND APPLICABLE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY
REQUIREMENTS FOUND IN APPENDIX A, PART C. OF THE NPDES PERMIT AND IS JOINTLY
RESPONSIBLE WITH THE OWNER FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF THE PERMIT.
13.TERMINATION OF COVERAGE-PERMITTEE(S) WISHING TO TERMINATE COVERAGE MUST SUBMIT A
NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) TO THE MPCA. ALL PERMITTEE(S) MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN
30 DAYS AFTER ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN MET:
A.FINAL STABILIZATION, PER NPDES PERMIT PART IV.G. HAS BEEN ACHIEVED ON ALL
PORTIONS OF THE SITE FOR WHICH THE PERMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE.
B.TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP AS DESCRIBED IN THE PERMIT.
15. INSPECTIONS
A.INITIAL INSPECTION FOLLOWING SILT FENCE INSTALLATION BY CITY REPRESENTATIVE IS
REQUIRED.
B.EXPOSED SOIL AREAS: ONCE EVERY 7 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS FOLLOWING A
0.5" OVER 24 HOUR RAIN EVENT.
C.STABILIZED AREAS: ONCE EVERY 30 DAYS
D.FROZEN GROUND: AS SOON AS RUNOFF OCCURS OR PRIOR TO RESUMING
CONSTRUCTION.
E.INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED FOR 3 YEARS AFTER
FILING OF THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION AND MUST INCLUDE: DATE AND TIME OF
ACTION, NAME OF PERSON(S) CONDUCTING WORK, FINDING OF INSPECTIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION, DATE AND AMOUNT OF RAINFALL
EVENTS GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN A 24 HOUR PERIOD.
16. MINIMUM MAINTENANCE
A.SILT FENCE TO BE REPAIRED, REPLACED, SUPPLEMENTED WHEN NONFUNCTIONAL, OR
1/3 FULL; WITHIN 24 HOURS
B.SEDIMENT BASINS DRAINED AND SEDIMENT REMOVED WHEN REACHES 1/2 STORAGE
VOLUME. REMOVAL MUST BE COMPLETE WITHIN 72 HOURS OF DISCOVERY.
C.SEDIMENT REMOVED FROM SURFACE WATERS WITHIN (7)SEVEN DAYS
D.CONSTRUCTION SITE EXITS INSPECTED, TRACKED SEDIMENT REMOVED WITH 24
HOURS.
E.PROVIDE COPIES OF EROSION INSPECTION RESULTS TO CITY ENGINEER FOR ALL
EVENTS GREATER THAN 12" IN 24 HOURS
17.THE SWPPP, INCLUDING ALL CHANGES TO IT, AND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS
MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY BY THE PERMITTEE(S) WHO HAVE
OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THE SITE.
18.OWNER MUST KEEP RECORDS OF ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT, THE SWPPP, ALL
INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE, PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS,
AND REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORM WATER
MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. THESE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED FOR THREE YEARS AFTER FILING
NPDES NOTICE OF TERMINATION.
19.SWPPP MUST BE AMENDED WHEN:
A.THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, WEATHER OR SEASONAL
CONDITIONS THAT HAS A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON DISCHARGE
B.INSPECTIONS INDICATE THAT THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE AND DISCHARGE IS
EXCEEDING WATER QUALITY STANDARDS.
C.THE BMP'S IN THE SWPPP ARE NOT CONTROLLING POLLUTANTS IN DISCHARGES OR IS
NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT.
D.AT ANY TIME AFTER PERMIT COVERAGE IS EFFECTIVE, THE MPCA MAY DETERMINE THAT
THE PROJECT'S STORMWATER DISCHARGES MAY CAUSE, HAVE REASONABLE POTENTIAL
TO CAUSE, OR CONTRIBUTE TO NON-ATTAINMENT OF ANY APPLICABLE WATER
QUALITY STANDARD, OR THAT THE SWPPP DOES NOT INCORPORATE THE APPLICABLE
REQUIREMENTS IN PART III.A.8., (IMPAIRED WATERS AND TMDLS). IF A WATER QUALITY
STANDARD CHANGES DURING THE TERM OF THIS PERMIT, THE MPCA WILL AKE A
DETERMINATION AS TO WHETHER A MODIFICATION OF THE SWPPP IS NECESSARY TO
ADDRESS THE NEW STANDARD. IF THE MPCA MAKES SUCH DETERMINATION(S) OR ANY
OF THE DETERMINATIONS IN PARTS III.B.1.-3., THE MPCA WILL NOTIFY THE PERMITTEE(S)
IN WRITING. IN RESPONSE, THE PERMITTEE(S) MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO ADDRESS
THE IDENTIFIED CONCERNS AND SUBMIT INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE MPCA,
WHICH MAY INCLUDE AN INDIVIDUAL PERMIT APPLICATION. IF THE MPCA'S WRITTEN
NOTIFICATION REQUIRES A RESPONSE, FAILURE TO RESPOND WITHIN THE SPECIFIED
TIMEFRAME CONSTITUTES A PERMIT VIOLATION.
20.CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA
A.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE PREFABRICATED CONCRETE WASH-OUT CONTAINER WITH
RAIN PROTECTION PER PLAN.
B.CONCRETE WASH-OUT TO BE IDENTIFIED WITH SIGNAGE STATING "CONCRETE
WASHOUT AREA DO NOT OVERFILL".
C.CONCRETE WASHOUT WATER NEEDS TO BE PUMPED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF STANDING
WATER IN WASHOUT AREA.
21.IN THE EVENT OF ENCOUNTERING A WELL OR SPRING DURING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR
TO CEASE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND NOTIFY ENGINEER.
22.PIPE OULTETS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION
WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER.
23.FINAL STABILIZATION
FINAL STABILIZATION REQUIRES THAT ALL SOIL DISTURBING ACVTIVITIES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED
AND THAT DISTURBED AREAS ARE STABILIZED BY A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATIVE COVER
WITH 70% OF THE EXPECTED FINAL DENSITY, AND THAT ALL PERMANENT PAVEMENTS HAVE BEEN
INSTALLED. ALL TEMPORARY BMP'S SHALL BE REMOVED, DITCHES STABILIZED, AND SEDIMENT
SHALL BE REMOVED FROM PERMANENT CONVEYANCES AND SEDIMENTATION BASINS IN ORDER
TO RETURN THE POND TO DESIGN CAPACITY.
24. TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS
A.THE TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MADE
OPERATIONAL PRIOR TO DISTURBANCE OF 10 OR MORE ACRES DRAINING TO A
COMMON LOCATION.
B.TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO RUNOFF LEAVING THE
CONSTRUCTION SITE OR ENTERING SURFACE WATERS WHEN 10 OR MORE ACRES OF
DISTURBED SOILS DRAIN TO A COMMON LOCATION. THE BASIN MUST PROVIDE 3,600
CUBIC FEET OF STORAGE BELOW THE OUTLET PER ACRE DRAINED. IF HYDRAULIC
CALCULATIONS ARE AVAILABLE, THE TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN MUST
PROVIDE A STORAGE VOLUME EQUIVALENT TO THE 2-YEAR, 24-HOUR STORM, BUT IN
NO CASE LESS THAN 1800 CUBIC FEET PER ACRE DRAINED. THE TEMPORARY
SEDIMENTATION BASIN MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AND MADE OPERATIONAL
CONCURRENT WITH THE START OF SOIL DISTURBANCE UP GRADIENT OF THE POND.
THE TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PREVENT SHORT
CIRCUITING. THE OUTFALL SHALL BE DESIGNED TO REMOVE FLOATABLE DEBRIS,
ALLOW FOR COMPLETE DRAWDOWN OF THE POND FOR MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES,
AND HAVE ENERGY DISSIPATION. THE EMERGENCY SPILLWAY SHALL BE
STABILIZED.
C.TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS SHALL BE SITUATED OUTSIDE OF SURFACE
WATERS AND ANY REQUIRED BUFFER ZONE, AND MUST BE DESIGNED TO AVOID
DRAINING WETLANDS, UNLESS THE IMPACT IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PERMIT.
D.EXCESSIVE SEDIMENT-LADEN WATER THAT IS NOT PROPERLY FILTERED WILL NOT BE
PERMITTED TO DISCHARGE FROM SIRE.
25.DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING
A.TURBID OR SEDIMENT-LADEN WATERS RELATED TO DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING
SHALL BE DISCHARGED TO A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASIN
ON THE PROJECT SITE UNLESS INFEASIBLE. THE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT BASIN
MAY DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATERS IF THE BASIN WATER HAS BEEN VISUALLY
CHECKED TO ENSURE ADEQUATE TREATMENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED IN THE BASIN
AND THAT THE NUISANCE CONDITIONS WILL NOT RESULT FROM THE DISCHARGE.
DISCHARGE POINTS SHALL BE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND PROPER
VELOCITY DISSIPATION PROVIDED.
B.ALL WATER FROM DEWATERING OR BASIN-DRAINING ACTIVITIES MUST BE
DISCHARGED IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE NUISANCE CONDITIONS,
EROSION IN THE RECEIVING CHANNELS OR ON DOWN SLOPE PROPERTIES, OR
INUNDATION IN WETLANDS CAUSING SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE
WETLAND.
C.IF FILTERS WITH BACKWASH WATERS ARE USED, THE BACKWASH WATER SHALL BE
HAULED AWAY FOR DISPOSAL, RETURNED TO THE BEGINING OF THE TREATMENT
PROCESS, OR INCORPORATED INTO SITE IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE
EROSION. BACKWASH WATER MAY BE DISCHARGED TO SANITARY SEWER IF
PERMISSION IS GRANTED BY THE SANITARY SEWER AUTHORITY.
26.POLLUTION PREVENTION
A.BUILDING PRODUCTS THAT HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO LEACH POLLUTANTS MUST BE
UNDER COVER TO PREVENT DISCHARGE OR PROTECTED BY AN EFFECTIVE MEANS
DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER.
B.PESTICIDES, HERBICIDES, INSECTICIDES, FERTILIZERS, TREATMENT CHEMICALS, AND
LANDSCAPE MATERIALS MUST BE UNDER COVER.
C.HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TOXIC WASTE MUST BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT
VANDALISM.
D.SOLID WASTER MUST BE STORED, COLLECTED AND DISPOSED OF IN COMPLIANCE
WITH MINN. R. CH 7035.
E.PORTABLE TOILETS MUST BE POSITIONED SO THAT THEY ARE SECURE AND WILL NOT
BE TIPPED OR KNOCKED OVER. SANITARY WASTE MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH MINN. R. CH 7041.
F.DISCHARGE OF SPILLED OR LEAKED CHEMICALS, INCLUDING FUEL, FROM ANY AREA
WHERE CHEMICALS OR FUEL WILL BE LOADED OR UNLOADED SHALL BE PREVENTED
USING DRIP PANS OR ABSORBENTS. SUPPLIES SHALL BE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES TO
CLEAN UP DISCHARGED MATERIALS AND THAT AN APPROPRIATE DISPOSAL
METHOD MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR RECOVERED SPILLED MATERIALS.
27. DESIGN CALCULATIONS
TEMPORARY & PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT ARE DESIGNED TO MEET MPCA GENERAL
& SPECIAL WATER REQUIREMENTS. CALCULATIONS ARE PART OF THE HYDROLOGY REPORT,
WHICH IS TO BE CONSIDERED PART OF THE SWPP DOCUMENTS. SEE HYDROLOGY REPORT FOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
28.GENERAL STORMWATER DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS
ALL REQUIREMENTS LISTED IN PART III OF THE PERMIT FOR DESIGN OF THE PERMANENT
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND DISCHARGE HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE
PREPARATION OF THIS SWPP. THESE INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO:
A.THE EXPECTED AMOUNT, FREQUENCY, INTENSITY, AND DURATION PRECIPITATION.
B.THE NATURE OF STORMWATER RUNOFF AND RUN-ON AT THE SITE.
C.PEAK FLOW RATES AND STORWATER VOLUMES TO MINIMIZE EROSION AT OUTLETS
AND DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL AND STREAM BANK EROSION.
D.THE RANGE OF SOIL PARTICLE SIZES EXPECTED TO BE PRESENT ON THE SITE.
29.CONSTRUCTION OF FILTRATION BASINS
A.NO HEAVY TRAFFIC ON FILTRATION AREAS. CONSTRUCTION TO BE DONE WITH
MINIMAL COMPACTION COMPACTION TO FILTRATION AREAS. IF COMPACTION IS
ENCOUNTERED, BASIN SOILS FOR THE FIRST & MUST BE REMOVED & RELAID.
B.INFILTRATION SYSTEMS MUST NOT BE EXCAVATED TO FINAL GRADE UNTIL THE
CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAD BEEN CONSTRUCTED AND FULLY STABILIZED
UNLESS RIGOROUS EROSIN PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE PROVIDED(
PART III.D.1.C.).
C.WHEN AN INFILTRATION SYSTEM IS EXCAVATED TO FINAL GRADE (OR WITHIN THREE
(3) FEET OF FINAL GRADE), THE PERMITTEE(S) MUST EMPLOY RIGOROUS EROSION
PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS (E.G., DIVERSION BERMS) TO KEEP SEDIMENT
AND RUNOFF COMPLETELY AWAY FROM THE INFILTRATION AREA. THE AREA MUST BE
STAKED OFF AND MARKED SO THAT HEAVY CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT
WILL NOT COMPACT THE SOIL IN THE PROPOSED INFILTRATION AREA.
D.TO PREVENT CLOGGING OF THE INFILTRATION OR FILTRATION SYSTEM, THE
PERMITTEE(S) MUST USE A PRETREATMENT DEVICE SUCH AS A VEGETATED FILTER STRIP,
SMALL SEDIMENTATION BASIN, OR WATER QUALITY INLET (E.G., GRIT CHAMBER) TO
SETTLE PARTICULATES BEFORE THE STORMWATER DISCHARGES INTO THE INFILTRATION
OF FILTRATION SYSTEM.
30.POST CONSTRUCTION
THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME THAT MUST BE RETAINED ON SITE BY THE PROJECT'S PERMANENT
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DESCRIBED IN PART III.D. SHALL BE ONE (1) INCH OF
RUNOFF FROM THE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES CRATED BY THE PROJECT. SEE PART III.D.1. FOR
MORE INFORMATION ON INFILTRATION DESIGN, PROHIBITIONS AND APPROPRIATE SITE
CONDITIONS.
31.RESPONSIBILITIES
A.THE OWNER MUST IDENTIFY A CONTRACTOR WHO WILL OVERSEE THE SWPPP
IMPLEMENTATION AND THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR INSPECTION AND
MAINTENANCE:
B.THE OWNER MUST IDENTIFY THE A PERSON WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG
TERM OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PERMANENT STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM:
32.TRAINING REQEMENTS
THE PERMITTES(S) SHALL ENSURE THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS IDENTIFIED IN THIS PART HAVE
BEEN TRIANED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS PERMIT'S TRAINING REQUIREMENTS.
1. WHO MUST BE TRAINED:
A. INDIVIDUAL(S) PREPARING THE SWPPP FOR THE PROJECT
B. INDIVIDUAL(S) OVERSEEING IMPLEMENTATION OF, REVISING, AND AMENDING
THE SWPPP AND INDIVIDUALS(S) PERFORMING INSPECTIONS AS REQUIRED IN
PART IV.E. ONE OF THESE INDIVDUAL(S) MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR AN ONSITE
INSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST BY THE MPCA.
C.INDIVIDUAL(S) PERFORMING OR SUPERVISING THE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND
REPAIR OF BMPS. AT LEAST ONE INDIVIDUAL ON A PROJECT MUST BE TRAINED IN
THESE JOB DUTIES.
2.TRAINING CONTENT:
THE CONTENT AND EXTENT OF TRAINING MUST BE COMMENSURATE WITH THE
INDIVIDUAL'S JOB DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES WITH REGARD TO ACTIVITIES
COVERED UNDER THIS PERMIT FOR THE PROJECT. AT LEAST ONE INDIVIDUAL PRESENT
ON THE PERMITTED PROJECT SITE (OR AVAVILABLE TO THE PROJECT SIRE IN 72
HOURS) MUST BE TRAINED IN THE JOB DUTIES DESCRIBED IN PART III.F.1.B. AND
PARTIII.F.1.C.
3.THE PERMITTEE(S) SHALL ENSURE THAT THE INDIVIDUALS ARE TRAINED BY LOCAL,
STAT, FEDERAL AGENCIES, PROFESSIONAL OR OTHER ENTITIES WITH EXPERTISE IN
EROSION PREVENTION, SEDIMENT CONTROL, PERMANENT STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT AND THE MINNESOTA NPDES/SDS CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER
PERMIT. AN UPDATE REFESHER-TREINING MUST BE ATTENDED EVERY THREE (3) YEARS
STARTING THREE (3) YEARS FROM THE ISSUANCE DATE OF THIS PERMIT.
2.LIST OF CONTACTS
* MPCA 24HR. HAZARDOUS SPILL HOTLINE: 651-649-5457 OF 80420798
SWPPP NOTES
TITLE CONTACT
OWNER X
COMPANY PHONE NUMBER
X X
PROJECT MANAGER PJ DISCH LOUCKS 763-496-6736
SWPPP DESIGNER SAM TREBESCH LOUCKS 763-496-6751
CONTRACTOR
SITE MANAGER
TBD
TBD
SILT FENCE
PRE-ASSEMBLED OR MACHINE SLICED
6"
6"
NOTES:
1.PLACE BOTTOM EDGE OF FENCE INTO 6 IN DEEP TRENCH
AND BACKFILL IMMEDIATELY.
2.POSTS SHALL BE:
x 6 FT MAX. SPACING.
x 2 IN X 2IN HARDWOOD, OR STANDARD STEEL T-TYPE
FENCE POSTS.
x 5' MIN. LENGTH POSTS, DRIVEN 2 FT INTO THE
GROUND.
3.ATTACH FABRIC TO WOOD POST WITH A MIN. OF 5, 1
INCH LONG STAPLES.
4.ATTACH FABRIC TO STEEL POST WITH A MIN. OF 3 ZIP
TIES IN TOP 8 INCHES OF FABRIC.
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
PER MNDOT 3886
GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC PER
MNDOT 3886
DRAWN 2/2016
LOUCKS PLATE NO.
3000LOUCKS
INLET PROTECTION -
ROCK/COMPOST LOG
BUTT JOINTS
ENDS SECURELY CLOSED TO PREVENT
LOSS OF OPEN GRADED AGGREGATE
FILL. SECURED WITH 50 PSI. ZIP TIE
1
ROCK LOG/COMPOST LOG
NOTES:
SEE SPECS. 2573, 3137, 3886 & 3891.
MANUFACTURED ALTERNATIVES LISTED ON Mn/DOT'S APPROVED PRODUCTS
LIST MAY BE SUBSTITUTED.
1.GEOTEXTILE SOCK BETWEEN 4-10 FEET LONG AND 4-6 INCH DIAMETER.
SEAM TO BE JOINED BY TWO ROWS OF STITCHING WITH A PLASTIC MESH
BACKING OR PROVIDE A HEAT BONDED SEAM (OR APPROVED
EQUIVALENT). FILL ROCK LOG WITH OPEN GRADED AGGREGATE
CONSISTING OF SOUND DURABLE PARTICLES OF COARSE AGGREGATE
CONFORMING TO SPEC. 3137 TABLE 3137-1; CA-3 GRADATION.
DRAWN 2/2016
LOUCKS PLATE NO.
3014LOUCKS
SWPPP NOTES
C3-3
12/21/16 CITY SUBMITTAL
Review Date
SHEET INDEX
License No.
Date
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the
laws of the State of Minnesota.
PJ Disch - PE
49933
Project Lead
Drawn By
Checked By
Loucks Project No.16528A
PJD
SRT
PJD
X
X
LOUCKS
W:\2016\16528A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C4-1Plotted: 12 /21 / 2016 2:3 PM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300
Maple Grove, MN 55369
763.424.5505
www.loucksinc.com
PLANNING
CIVIL ENGINEERING
LAND SURVEYING
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS
PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE
QUALITY CONTROL
CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are
instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely
with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used
on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion
of this project by others without written approval by the
Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be
permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for
information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional
revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be
made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions
or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the
Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities.
CADD QUALIFICATION
MONTICELLO
DENTAL
MONTICELLO, MN
THE DAVIS GROUP
222 SOUTH 9TH STREET, SUITE 3255
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402
C1-1
C2-1
C3-1
C3-2
C3-3
C4-1
C8-1
EXISTING CONDITIONS
SITE PLAN
GRADING PLAN
SWPPP
SWPPP NOTES
SITE UTILITY PLAN
SITE DETAILS
N
EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN
THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE
STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE
WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002
MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES.
OWNER.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL
WARNING:
AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND
Gopher State One Call
23
SITE UTILITY
PLAN
C4-1
UTILITY NOTES
1. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN UTILITIES SHALL BE
FURNISHED AND INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS, THE
CITY AND THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS
ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), 1999 EDITION. ALL HDPE CONNECTIONS TO
CONCRETE MANHOLES SHALL BE CONNECTED WITH AN INTERNAL RUBBER GASKET
OR BY USING ADS WATERSTOP GASKET. ALL SANITARY SEWER MAIN LINE SHALL BE
SDR 35. ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL BE SDR 26.
2. SEE SHEET C8-1 AND THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR SPECIFIC UTILITY DETAILS
AND UTILITY SERVICE DETAILS.
3. ALL UTILITY PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED SAND OR FINE GRANULAR
MATERIAL PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE
PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEAM SPECIFICATION.
4. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND
BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER MUST BE
NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF
WAY, OR WORK IMPACTING PUBLIC UTILITIES.
5. ALL SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICES SHALL TERMINATE AT THE PROPERTY
LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT
LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND
WORK.
7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST WATERMAIN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH
SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, AND SERVICES AS REQUIRED. INSULATION OF
WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE 7.5 FEET MINIMUM
DEPTH CAN NOT BE ATTAINED.
8. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS
OF THE CITY. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND
SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL OF
UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE
ALL SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC
STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE
PERMITTED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED AUTHORITY OF OF THE CITY.
9. ALL NEW WATERMAIN MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF 7.5 FEET OF COVER.
10. ADJUST ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE TO THE PROPOSED
GRADES WHERE DISTURBED AND COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE UTILITY
OWNERS. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS
REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING.
11. PROPOSED PIPE MATERIALS:
WATERMAIN DIP CLASS 52 NO LESS THAN 7.5' DEEP.
SANITARY SEWER PVC SDR 35 NO MORE THAN 20' DEEP.
SANITARY SEWER PVC SDR26 20' - 25' DEEP.
STORM SEWER RCP CLASS 5 12" TO 18" DIAMETER.
12/21/16 CITY SUBMITTAL
Review Date
SHEET INDEX
License No.
Date
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the
laws of the State of Minnesota.
PJ Disch - PE
49933
Project Lead
Drawn By
Checked By
Loucks Project No.16528A
PJD
SRT
PJD
X
X
LOUCKS
W:\2016\16528A\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C8-1Plotted: 12 /21 / 2016 2:3 PM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300
Maple Grove, MN 55369
763.424.5505
www.loucksinc.com
PLANNING
CIVIL ENGINEERING
LAND SURVEYING
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
ENVIRONMENTAL
SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS
PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE
QUALITY CONTROL
CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are
instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely
with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used
on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion
of this project by others without written approval by the
Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be
permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for
information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional
revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be
made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions
or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the
Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities.
CADD QUALIFICATION
MONTICELLO
DENTAL
MONTICELLO, MN
THE DAVIS GROUP
222 SOUTH 9TH STREET, SUITE 3255
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402
C1-1
C2-1
C3-1
C3-2
C3-3
C4-1
C8-1
EXISTING CONDITIONS
SITE PLAN
GRADING PLAN
SWPPP
SWPPP NOTES
SITE UTILITY PLAN
SITE DETAILS
SITE DETAILS
C8-1
LOUCKS
1'-0"
SEE PLAN18'-0"
DRAWN 1/2014
LOUCKS PLATE NO.
2035
DRAWN 1/2014
LOUCKS PLATE NO.
2036TYPICAL ADA WHEELCHAIR
SYMBOL & PARKING SIGN
"PARKING BY
DISABLED PERMIT
ONLY"
ATTACH SIGN TO POST
WITH APPROPRIATE
STAINLESS STEEL
BOLTS, WASHERS &
NUTS. (TYP. AT TOP &
BOTTOM OF SIGN)
"VAN ACCESSIBLE"
SIGN
GRADE
NOTES:
1.PROVIDE (1) SIGN PER STALL
2.SIGN MUST MEET LOCAL
STANDARDS
PROVIDE PAINTED
WHEELCHAIR SYMBOL AT
EACH DESIGNATED
HANDICAP PARKING STALL.
CENTER SYMBOL IN STALL.
ALL LINES 5" WIDE
10" DIAMETER
WHEELCHAIR SYMBOL
NOT TO SCALE
HANDICAP PARKING SIGN
NOT TO SCALE
67.5
5
"HANDICAP
DROP-OFF ZONE
NO PARKING"
ATTACH SIGN TO POST
WITH APPROPRIATE
STAINLESS STEEL
BOLTS, WASHERS &
NUTS. (TYP. AT TOP &
BOTTOM OF SIGN)
GRADE
NOTES:
1.PROVIDE (1) SIGN PER
ACCESS AISLE
2.SIGN MUST MEET LOCAL
STANDARDS
HANDICAP ACCESS ISLE
NO PARKING SIGN
NOT TO SCALE
LOUCKS
SLOPE GUTTER TO MATCH
PARKING LOT DRAINAGE
(3/4" PER FT. TYP.)
TIP GUTTER OUT AS REQ'D
MINIMUM 1' BEHIND
BACK OF CURBAGG. BASE UNDER
CURB (IF TOTAL
THICKNESS OF
SECTION ALLOWS)
12"8"
1/2" RAD.
20"
DRAWN 1/2014
LOUCKS PLATE NO.
2012FLAT CURB AND
GUTTER (12")
SPECIFICATION NOTES:
1.UPON COMPLETION, CURBING SHOULD BE SPRAYED WITH A
MEMBRANE CURING COMPOUND PER MNDOT 3754.
2.EXPANSION JOINTS AT MAX. SPACING OF 200'.
3.CONSTRUCT IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2531.
LOUCKS
LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS SECTION
2" BIT. WEARING COURSE
MN/DOT SPEC. 2360
MN/DOT SPEC. 3138 (100% CRUSHED)
2" BITUMINOUS NON-WEAR COURSE
MN/DOT SPEC. 2360
10" AGG. BASE CLASS 5
2357 TACK COAT
MVWE35035
MVNW35035
HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS SECTION
DRAWN 1/2014
LOUCKS PLATE NO.
2031BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
SECTION
PAVEMENT SECTION BASED ON
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY X DATED
X/X/X
1.5" BIT. WEARING COURSE
MN/DOT SPEC. 2360
MN/DOT SPEC. 3138 (100% CRUSHED)
2" BITUMINOUS NON-WEAR COURSE
MN/DOT SPEC. 2360
8" AGG. BASE CLASS 5
2357 TACK COAT
APPROVED SUBGRADE
(SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT)
MVWE35035
MVNW35035
APPROVED SUBGRADE
(SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT)
LOUCKS
NOTES
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL REQUIRED CMP, PIPE BENDS AND TEES
TO CONNECT PIPES AT THE LIMITS OF THE UNDERGROUND PIPE SYSTEM
FOOTPRINT. (SEE UTILITY PLAN)
2. 4" PVC DRAINTILE SHALL FOLLOW 48" CMP PIPES AS
SHOW ABOVE AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE PIPE SYSTEM.
CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEES AS NECESSARY TO CONNECT
DRAINTILE OUTLET MANHOLE.
48" CMP 48" CMP
4" SLOTTED SINGLE WALL
HDPE PIPING WITH CIRCULAR
KNIT POLYMERIC FILAMENT
FILTER SOCK PER ASTM
D6707-01
FREE DRAINING ANGULAR
WASHED STONE 2" TO 3" MAX.
PARTICLE SIZE NO
CARBONATE
12" FREE DRAINING
GRAVEL SAND (GW,
GP, GM 0R SW)
PARTICLE SIZE -
0.02-0.04 INCHES
18"
48"
FILTER
FABRIC
SEPARATOR
12"24"
FILTER FABRIC
SEPARATOR
6"
6"
IE= 949.0
IE= 948.5
IE= 947.0
IE= 953.0
IE= 953.5 (2) 100 LF OF 48"
PERFORATED
CMP WITH (2)
HEADERS SEE
SHEET C4-1 FOR
LAYOUT
12"
LOUCKS PLATE NO.
48" STORM VAULTLOUCKS
PAGE 1 OF 1Drawn By: SANDYDate:12/16/2016Scale: AS NOTEDRevisions# Date CommentsGENERAL NOTES:A. PULSE PRODUCTS DOES NOT ASSUME RESPONSIBILITYFOR THE INTERPRETATION OF THIS CALCULATION ORCOMPLAINCE TO THE LOCAL, STATE, OR FEDERALLIGHTNG CODES OR ORDINANCES.B. LIGHTING LAYOUT IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENTS BUT ONLY TO ILLUSTRATE THE PERFORMANCEOF THE PRODUCT.C. ALL READINGS/CALCULATIONS SHOWN ARE SHOWN ONOBJECTS/SURFACES.D. MN ENERGY CODE MEET FOR LPD BUILDING METHOD OFFICE 0.9 LPW ALLOWED.MEETING MN ENERGY CODE WOULD REQUIRE:1. 0-10V DIM CONTROL FOR BI-LEVEL REQUIRED.2. SENSORS IN ALL PRIVATE OFFICES AND RESTROOMS3. AUTOMATIC OFF THROUGHOUT OPEN AREAS.MONTICELLOChecked By: TRENTLuminaire Location SummaryLumNoLabelXYZOrientTiltCalculation SummaryLuminaire ScheduleLabelCalcTypeUnitsAvgMaxMinAvg/MinMax/MinSymbolQtyLabelArrangementLLFDescriptionArr. WattsLum. Lumens4AASINGLE0.900MCGRAW GLEON-AF-04-LED-E1-5WQ MOUNT ON 25FT POLE WITH 3FT ABSE2252529126AA233.5301.428SITE GROUNDIlluminanceFc1.304.10.01BBSINGLE0.900MCGRAW GLEON-AF-04-LED-E1-T3 MOUNT ON 25FT POLE WITH 3FT BASE22524017900N.A.N.A.PARKINGIlluminanceFc2.6727AA129.7296.32890028AA128.3231.62890029AA210.12322890030BB131.6157.528168.33603.71.12.433.36PARKING HCIlluminanceFc1.471.81.11.341.64PROOF OF PARKIGN NORTHIlluminanceFc0.891.10.61.481.83Plan ViewScale: 1 inch= 30 Ft.DIM?NO PARKING
NO PARKINGPROPOSEDBUILDINGFFE - 961.00TTNH=962.82959.3HCTCTTAPPROX LOC ELEPER CO MARKINGSAPPROX LOCGAS &TEL PER CO MARKINGSAAAAAABBAA0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.10.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.00.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.2 0.4 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.1 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.7 1.8 1.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.10.1 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.5 1.8 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.10.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.2 0.3 0.7 1.2 1.8 2.3 2.5 2.8 2.7 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.20.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.10.2 0.3 0.7 1.3 2.0 2.8 2.9 2.9 3.0 1.6 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.30.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.20.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.3 2.1 3.1 3.4 3.1 3.2 2.8 1.4 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.50.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.20.2 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.3 2.1 3.3 4.0 3.8 3.8 3.5 1.8 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.70.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.20.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.3 2.1 3.2 4.1 3.8 3.3 3.4 1.8 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.90.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.30.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.3 2.0 3.0 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.8 1.9 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.21.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.30.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.3 2.0 2.9 3.6 3.7 3.9 4.1 2.2 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.41.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.30.2 0.4 0.5 0.8 1.3 2.0 2.8 3.4 3.7 4.0 4.1 2.8 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.81.7 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.50.3 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.3 1.9 2.7 3.3 3.6 3.9 3.9 3.2 2.4 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.22.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.60.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.3 1.9 2.6 3.2 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.3 2.7 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.62.5 2.3 2.1 1.8 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.70.3 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.5 3.0 3.3 3.7 3.5 3.3 3.0 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.82.9 2.6 2.3 2.0 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.80.3 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.4 1.9 2.4 2.9 3.1 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.1 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.03.0 2.7 2.4 2.2 1.8 1.4 1.2 0.9 0.70.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.9 2.3 2.7 3.0 3.2 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.13.1 2.9 2.8 2.5 2.2 1.9 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.80.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.9 2.3 2.6 2.9 3.1 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.13.0 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.0 1.7 1.4 1.1 0.80.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.8 2.2 2.5 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.0 2.92.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.1 1.8 1.5 1.2 0.90.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.1 2.5 2.7 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.72.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.0 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.70.3 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.62.7 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.0 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.70.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.9 2.2 2.4 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.42.6 2.5 2.7 2.6 2.2 2.0 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.70.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.22.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.5 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.50.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.92.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.40.3 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.71.8 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.40.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.41.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.20.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.11.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.20.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.90.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.20.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.70.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.20.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.50.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.20.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.30.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.10.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.20.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.11 fc1 fc1 fc1 fc1 fc1 fc1 fc1 fc0.5 fc0.5 fc0.5 fc0.5 fc0.5 fc0.5 fc0.5 fc0.5 fc0.25 fc0.25 fc0.25 fc0.25 fc0.25 fc0.25 fc0.25 fcGLEON SERIES
W:\2016\16528A\CADD DATA\LANDSCAPE\_dwg Sheet Files\L1-1Plotted: 12 /21 / 2016 2:5 PMSUBMITTAL/REVISIONS
PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE
QUALITY CONTROL
CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are
instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely
with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used
on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion
of this project by others without written approval by the
Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be
permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for
information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional
revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be
made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions
or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the
Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities.
CADD QUALIFICATION
MONTICELLO
DENTAL
MONTICELLO, MN
THE DAVIS GROUP
222 SOUTH 9TH STREET, SUITE 3255
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402
L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN
12/21/16 CITY SUBMITTAL
REG. NO.23849 DATE
Debra Brodsho
12/21/16
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Landscape
Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Project Lead
Checked By
LANDSCAPE
PLAN
L1-1
N
EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN
THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE
STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE
WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002
MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES.
OWNER.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL
WARNING:
AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND
Gopher State One Call
4116$#..
64''2.#06+0)&'6#+.
/+0
0Q5ECNG
64''
70&+5674$'&':+56+0)51+.
6121($#..61$'Á
.#;'4911&%*+2/7.%*
94#264''61(+456.#6'4#.
/+0
2.#06+0)51+.$#%-(+..
5#7%'4
(+0+5*'&)4#&'
#$18'(+0+5*'&)4#&'
$4#0%*+0)
(#..10.;
'37#..;52#%'&&')#4170&
ÁZ56#-'5+0)4170&
ÁZ56#-'5+0)4170&
56#-+0)"%1064#%6145126+10
64''5.#4)'46*#0
+0.+0'96470-
64''561
%'06'464''+0*1.'
0Q5ECNG
5*47$2.#06+0)&'6#+.
#$18'(+0+5*'&)4#&'
(+0+5*'&)4#&'
5#7%'4
2.#06+0)51+.$#%-(+..
.#;'4911&%*+2/7.%*
6121($#..61$'Á
70&+5674$'&':+56+0)51+.
/+0
4116$#..
/+0
PP03
2
PP03
4
PP03
3
PP03
1
NmmMOmobifjfk^ov=cillo=mi^k Ç~íÉW=NOLNOLNS
" = ' "
ëÅ~äÉW==NLU = =N JM
1/8" = 1'-0"
PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLAN1
LEVEL 01
100' - 0"
ROOF
114' - 7"
PARAPET C
116' - 0"
PARAPET A
122' - 4"
VESTIBULE GLAZING
112' - 0"
T.O. CANOPY
114' - 0"
PARAPET B
118' - 0"
T.O. GLAZING SILL
101' - 4"
T.O. WINDOW SILL
103' - 4"
FABCED
PAINTED ALUMINUM CORNICE
BUILDING NAME
PAINTED ALUMINUM CORNICE
EFIS
BRICK
PAINTED SILL
PAINTED CMU
SLIDING STOREFRONT
ENTRY DOORS
ANODIZED ALUM. WINDOW FRAME
W/ TINTED WINDOW GLAZING T.O. WINDOW
109' - 2"
LEVEL 01
100' - 0"
ROOF
114' - 7"
PARAPET C
116' - 0"
PARAPET A
122' - 4"
VESTIBULE GLAZING
112' - 0"
T.O. CANOPY
114' - 0"
PARAPET B
118' - 0"
T.O. GLAZING SILL
101' - 4"
T.O. WINDOW SILL
103' - 4"
1423
T.O. WINDOW
109' - 2"
LEVEL 01
100' - 0"
ROOF
114' - 7"
PARAPET C
116' - 0"
PARAPET A
122' - 4"
VESTIBULE GLAZING
112' - 0"
T.O. CANOPY
114' - 0"
PARAPET B
118' - 0"
T.O. GLAZING SILL
101' - 4"
T.O. WINDOW SILL
103' - 4"
F ABCED
T.O. WINDOW
109' - 2"
LEVEL 01
100' - 0"
ROOF
114' - 7"
PARAPET C
116' - 0"
PARAPET A
122' - 4"
VESTIBULE GLAZING
112' - 0"
T.O. CANOPY
114' - 0"
PARAPET B
118' - 0"
T.O. GLAZING SILL
101' - 4"
T.O. WINDOW SILL
103' - 4"
1 423
T.O. WINDOW
109' - 2"
FINISH GRADE 1' - 4" 8"2' - 0"SIGN CABINET2' - 10"5"1' - 0"1"
1' - 6"
1"
1' - 4"
1"FOR EXACT SPECIFICATIONSSEE STRUCTRAL PLANS 4' - 10"
BRICK
PRE FINISHED CONCRETE CAP
INTERNALLY LIT SIGN CABINET
6
PP03
FINISH GRADE
1"
4' - 10"
1"
5' - 0"1' - 4" 8"SIGN CABINET2' - 10"2' - 0"4"FOR EXACT SPECIFICATIONSSEE STRUCTURAL PLANS 4' - 10"
4"
SIGN CABINET
4' - 4"
BRICK
PRE FINISHED CONCRETE CAP
INTERNALLY LIT SIGN CABINET
3" 1' - 0" 3"
1' - 6"
1"
FINISH BRICK FACE
1' - 4"1"4' - 4"1"FINISH BRICK FACE4' - 10" 1"5' - 0"PRE FINISHED CONCRETE CAP
INTERNALLY LIT SIGN CABINET
NmmMPmobifjfk^ov=bibs^qflkp Ç~íÉW=NOLNOLNS
ëÅ~äÉW=^ë
áåÇáÅ~íÉÇ
1/8" = 1'-0"
PRELIMINARY ELEVATION - WEST1
1/8" = 1'-0"
PRELIMINARY ELEVATION - NORTH2
1/8" = 1'-0"
PRELIMINARY ELEVATION - EAST3
1/8" = 1'-0"
PRELIMINARY ELEVATION - SOUTH4
1/2" = 1'-0"
SECTION @ MONUMENT SIGN6
1/2" = 1'-0"
ELEVATION @ MONUMENT SIGN7
1/2" = 1'-0"
ENLARGED PLAN @ MONUMENT SIGN5
Building a legacy – your legacy. 701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763-541-4800
Fax: 763-541-1700
Equal Opportunity Employer
wsbeng.com
K:\02596-390\Admin\Docs\LTR-a-schumann-MontSpecialtyClinic 020117.docx
February 1, 2017
Ms. Angela Schumann
Community Development Director
City of Monticello
505 Walnut Street, Suite 1
Monticello, MN 55362
Re: Monticello Specialty Clinic
Site Plan Review
City Project No. 2017-007
WSB Project No. 02596-390
Dear Ms. Schumann:
We have reviewed the civil plans, dated December 21, 2016 and the stormwater report dated
December 20, 2016, as prepared by Loucks, Inc. and offer the following comments.
Site Plan
1. City staff requested an interpretation of Chapter 2, Section 2.4, Subsection (O) for the
site, which requires delineation of wetlands and/or watercourses within 200 feet of the
perimeter of the property with a land use submittal. The subject property is within the 200-
feet of the large wetland complex north of the site. A Level 1 wetland review was completed
which included a desktop review of the site using aerial images and Wright County soil
classification mapping. Based on this review, no physical impacts will occur to the identified
wetland area. In addition, because the applicant is proposing to treat all stormwater onsite
and will not increase runoff from the existing condition, no secondary impacts to the wetland
area are expected. For these reasons, the subject property would not be subject to the
regulations of the Wetland Conservation Act and a delineation is not required.
2. The retaining wall on northeast corner of site is approximately 6.5 feet tall and must be
designed and certified by a licensed professional engineer. Provide a detail for the retaining
wall include material type and color.
SWPPP Plan
3. Identify the site disturbed area.
February 1, 2017
Page 2
K:\02596-390\Admin\Docs\LTR-a-schumann-MontSpecialtyClinic 020117.docx
4. A NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit shall be provided with the
grading permit or with the building permit application for review, prior to construction
commencing.
5. The applicant shall revise the SWPPP as needed to comply with the MPCA SWPPP
checklist.
Site Utility Plan
6. Move fire hydrant to north of the building entrance which will allow for better spacing
with the hydrant on Deegan Court.
7. A utility excavation permit must be obtained from the Public Works department prior to
commencement of utility connections.
8. Provide an as-built utility plan once construction is complete.
Site Details
9. City standard detail plates 6003 related to construction entrances shall be included.
Stormwater Management Plan
10. The existing stormwater pond north of the site accommodates rate control for the
developed site.
11. Enclosed is a stormwater plan review checklist that identifies comments the applicant
shall address.
Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please
give me a call at 763-271-3236 if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Shibani K. Bisson, PE
City Engineer
February 1, 2017
Page 3
K:\02596-390\Admin\Docs\LTR-a-schumann-MontSpecialtyClinic 020117.docx
cc: Steve Grittman, NAC
Enclosure
skb
October 2016
City of Monticello – Stormwater Site Plan
Review
A Stormwater Management Plan is required for:
- Any land disturbing activity that may ultimately result in the addition of one acre or
greater of impervious surfaces, including smaller individual sites that are part of a common
plan of development that may be constructed at different times.
- The construction of any new public or private road; or
- Any land disturbance activity, regardless of size, that the City determines is likely to cause
an adverse impact to an environmentally sensitive area or other property.
Submittals Received
Date Document Author
12/20/16 Stormwater Management Plan, Monticello
Dental Loucks
12/21/16 Preliminary Plan Set, Monticello Specialty
Clinic Loucks
Project Narrative, Monticello Specialty Clinic
Building B D H and Young
General Site Plan
Yes No
1. Scale of Survey. Minimum scale 1” = 50’. Maximum size plan sheet 24” x 36” ☒ ☐
2. Survey signed by a registered survey with elevations in NGVD-1929 datum for the
following locations:
Each lot corner ☒ ☐
Grade elevation at the foundation and elevation of top of foundation of structures on
adjacent lots ☒ ☐
Grade elevation at the foundation, elevation of top of foundation and garage flo or of
proposed new construction ☒ ☐
Lowest point of entry (i.e. door sill or top of window well) of pro posed and existing
construction ☐ ☒
Lowest floor of proposed and existing construction ☒ ☐
3. Any proposed retaining wall must have a top and bottom elevation and bottom elevation
would be finish grade. Also, no retaining wall is allowed to be built on private property ☒ ☐
Address:
Monticello Dental
Lot 2, Block 1, Prairie
Ponds Permit No:
PID: Date Approved:
Date Received: 12/22/16 Signature:
Site Size (acres): 1.67 ac
Area of
Disturbance(acres): 1.67 ac
Existing
Impervious (acres): 0 ac
Proposed
Impervious (acres): 1.04 ac
October 2016
4. Retaining walls greater than 4.0 feet in height have been designed and certified by a
licensed professional engineer and a building permit has been acquired ☐ ☒
5. All drainage and utility easements are shown? ☒ ☐
6. Easements are clear of any encroachments? ☒ ☐
7. New curb cuts proposed? ☐ ☐
8. If new curb cut is proposed, stamp all survey maps with the curb cut stamp. Also, write a
note on the Residential Plan & Routing Approval form reminding the builder that a curb
cut permit is required if the driveway is moved or a new driveway is added
☐ ☐
9. Low floor a minimum of 4.25’ (feet) above the sanitary sewer invert elevation ☒ ☐
Comments:
Proposed retaining wall has a maximum height of 6.5 feet. Documentation of design by a licensed professional
engineer is required.
Lowest point of entry of proposed building needs to be clearly shown on Sheet C3 -1.
It appears as though a curb cut will be required. If so, it needs to be shown on the plans as described above.
Erosion/Sediment Control Plan
Yes No
1. SWPPP notes provided on the plan ☒ ☐
2. Temporary stabilization measures provided ☒ ☐
3. Erosion control blankets provided on all slopes greater than 3:1 ☒ ☐
4. Perimeter Control i.e., Silt Fence, Filter Log, etc. ☒ ☐
5. Phasing for sites that are ≥ 1 acre ☒ ☐
6. CB Inlet Protection ☒ ☐
7. Dewatering ☒ ☐
8. Sediment control ☒ ☐
9. Waste control ☒ ☐
10. Concrete washout ☒ ☐
11. Rock entrance ☒ ☐
12. Street sweeping schedule ☐ ☐
13. Permanent restoration plan ☒ ☐
14. Erosion protection at all outlet pipes ☒ ☐
15. SWPPP includes an erosion and sediment control inspection schedule and per son
responsible for maintenance ☐ ☒
Comments:
“Site Data” notes need to be added to the SWPPP, including area of disturbance, pre-construction impervious
area, post-construction impervious area and general soil type.
A street sweeping schedule needs to be added to the SWPPP.
The SWPPP needs to provide the name of the person responsible for SWPPP implementation and long term
operations and maintenance of the permane nt stormwater management system, including certification number.
Stormwater Management Plan
Yes No
1. Delineation maps for existing and proposed conditions ☒ ☐
2. Modeling calculations for existing and proposed conditions using Atlas 14 storm events
with an MSE3 type distribution.
October 2016
2 year 24 hr. (2.84”), 10 year 24 hr. (4.22”), 100 (6.87”), 10-day snowmelt (7.2”) ☐ ☒
Modeled direct connected impervious separate ☐ ☒
3. Off-site drainage included ☐ ☒
4. Wetlands shown on plans and wetland permitting completed ☐ ☐
5. Pretreatment ☐ ☒
6. Skimmer structures provided on the outlets of all ponds. ☐ ☒
7. Soil borings ☐ ☒
8. Design Infiltration Rate Determination – Geotechnical Report or Infiltration Testing
provided ☐ ☒
9. Seasonal High Water Elevation ☐ ☒
10. Open channel flow calculations ☐ ☒
11. Storm sewer calculations – 10 year event ☒ ☐
12. Narrative describing the following:
a. Existing Conditions:
Runoff rates for existing conditions were not provided. Drainage maps,
modeling and summary for the 2-, 10- and 100-year storm events is required.
b. Proposed Conditions:
Runoff rates at all discharge locations were not provided. Drainage maps,
modeling and summary for the 2-, 10- and 100-year storm events is required.
c. Stormwater Management for Proposed
Site:
A discussion of pretreatment and infiltration feasibility
should be included in the report.
Comments:
The HydroCAD model should include an MSE3 distribution for the Atlas 14 2 -, 10- and 100-year storm events.
The stormwater report does not include this information. HydroCAD model output should be included in the
report, along with a summary table showing the existin g and proposed discharge rates.
Pretreatment of runoff is required prior to entering the infiltration basin.
Soil borings are required in order to determine groundwater and bedrock elevations. There must be a minimum
of 3-feet of separation from the bottom of the infiltration basin to the top of either bedrock or groundwater.
Seasonal high water elevations were not provided. Soil boring logs and/or piezometer testing can be used to
determine groundwater fluctuations.
Runoff rates at all discharge locations from the site were not provided. The HydroCAD model should be
modified to provide rates for the 2-, 10- and 100-year events.
Off-site drainage from the lot to the south should be included in the HydroCAD model. It appears as though
CBMH5 will receive off-site runoff.
A detail drawing for the outlet control structure at the infiltration basin should be added to Sheet C8 -1.
City design standards requires a minimum size of stormsewer pipe of 15 -inches. The proposed stormsewer
includes 12-inch pipes throughout the site.
Water Quality and Volume Reduction
“The City of Monticello has adopted MPCA Minimal Impact Design Standards in Chapter 4 of Monticello Zoning Ordinance
Section 4.10. MIDs Infiltration design criteria as described in the MPCA Stormwater Manual shall be followed for the proposed
project.”
Yes No
1. Volume control provided as per the City’s Engineering Design Standards and MIDS (1.1”
over new impervious surface) ☒ ☐
2. Impervious area equal to or greater than the net increase in impervious surface is routed
through infiltration BMP ☒ ☐
October 2016
3. Sequencing provided for alternatives where infiltration is infeasible ☐ ☐
4. Required Volume Reduction:
4,162
cf
5. Provided Volume Reduction:
4,294
cf
6. Separation to groundwater and/or bedrock is a minimum of 3 feet from bottom of
infiltration BMP ☐ ☒
7. Drawdown time for infiltration BMP is within 48 hours ☐ ☒
8. Proposed ponds meet or exceed NURP design criteria ☐ ☐
9. If infiltration of 1.1” is not feasible, water quality goals are met with NURP pond on site? ☐ ☒
Comments:
The overall feasibility of the infiltration basin cannot be verified without knowing the depth to groundwater and
bedrock. Soil boring data is needed for this determination.
The drawdown time for infiltration cannot be determined without infiltration testing. Documentation of how the
design infiltration rate was determined is required.
The infiltration basin is lined with filter fabric. Specifications for the fabric should be provided, documenting
that it is soil tight and water permeable.
An operation and maintenance plan is needed for all of the proposed BMPs at the site.
Rate Control
Yes No
1. Peak Proposed Discharge Rates < Existing ☐ ☐
2. Existing infrastructure can accommodate peak discharge rates for 10 year storm? ☐ ☐
3. Existing infrastructure and EOF for proposed 100 year peak discharge rate? ☐ ☐
4. Proposed flow patterns do not create flooding impacts for structures adjacent to the
property? ☐ ☐
Comments:
Rate control for the proposed project is planned to be provided at the regional basin to the north. However,
discharge rates for the 2-, 10- and 100-year storm events should be modeled and summarized in the report.
Freeboard
Yes No
1. Building Opening:
2’ above the critical 100-yr HWL of local basins, wetlands, & infiltration basins ☐ ☒
2’ above EOF of local basins, wetlands, & infiltration basins ☐ ☒
2’ above the 100-yr flow elevation of a swale or channel at the point where the swale
channel is closest to the building ☐ ☒
2. Low Floor Elevation:
2’ above the critical 100-yr HWL of major basins ☐ ☒
2’ above EOF of major basins ☐ ☒
For landlocked basins: 2’ above the HWL from back to back 100-yr rainfalls or 2’
above the HWL from the 100-yr 10-day snowmelt, whichever is higher. Starting
elevation of the basin/waterbody prior to runoff is one of the following:
o Existing Ordinary High Water level established by the Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources ☐ ☐
October 2016
o Annual water balance calculation approved by the City ☐ ☐
o Local observation well records, as approved by the City ☐ ☐
o Mottled soil ☐ ☐
Comments:
The low building opening elevation should be added to the planset.
The HydroCAD model does not provide a 100-year HWL for the infiltration basin.
When the model and planset are updated freeboard criteria can be evaluated for conformance to City
standards.
Planning Commission Agenda – 02/07/17
1
2B. Public Hearing – Consideration to recommend for the adoption the 2017 City of
Monticello OfficialZoningMap. (AS)
A.REFERENCE & BACKGROUND
The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed 2017 Official Zoning Map at the
regular meeting in January and recommended its’ approval.
However, staff cross-checked the special use overlay district boundaries also
reviewed at the January meeting and noticed a discrepancy between the proposed
official zoning map and the boundary of the special use district.
As such, the map presented for review and hearing in February now accurately
displays the special use district boundary, consistent with the boundary reviewed by
the Planning Commission in January. The special use overlay boundary is the only
change from the January map.
B.ALTERNATIVEACTIONS
1.Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC-2017-004 recommending the adoption of
Ordinance No. 6XX for the 2017 City of Monticello Official Zoning Map,
including Shoreland/Floodplain companion map, based on the findings in said
resolution.
2.Motion of other.
.
C.STAFFRECOMMENDATION
StaffrecommendsadoptionoftheCityofMonticelloOfficialZoningMapasproposed.
D.SUPPORTING DATA
A.Resolution No. PC-2017-004
B.Ordinance No. 6XX, Draft
C.2017 Official Zoning Map, Proposed (dated 1/23/17) – including Shoreland
D.Special Use Overlay Analysis, Map
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. PC-2017-004
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN AMENDMENT
TO THE ZONING MAP IN ITS ENTIRETY
WHEREAS, the Zoning Map of the City of Monticello requires amendment; and
WHEREAS, the proposed map would accommodate and further the intentions and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the proposed zoning would be consistent with the City’s land use plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello finds that the proposed zoning map
will be consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive land use plan and proposed zoning district;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has conducted a public hearing on January 3rd, 2017 and
February 7th, 2017 to review the requests and receive public comment on the zoning map
amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed zoning map, including
Shoreland/Floodplain map, has met the requirements for adoption as found in the zoning ordinance
and state law;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota:
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the zoning map
amendment to be identified as Ordinance No. 6__.
ADOPTED this 7th day of February, 2017 by the Planning Commission of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota.
MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
By: _______________________________
Brad Fyle, Chair
ATTEST:
____________________________________________
Angela Schumann, Community Development Director
ORDINANCE NO. 6XX
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND ADOPTING THE 2017 OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS:
Section 1. The zoning map amendments attached hereto and incorporated herein as
Exhibit “A” are adopted as the Official Zoning Map under Title 10, Section 3.1
of the Zoning Ordinance for the City of Monticello.
Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its
passage and publication. Revisions will be made online after adoption by
Council. Copies of the complete Zoning Ordinance are available online and
at Monticello City Hall upon request.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION BY the Monticello City Council this 13th
day of February, 2017.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
_____________________________
Brian Stumpf, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Jeff O’Neill, City Administrator
VOTING IN FAVOR:
VOTING IN OPPOSITION:
ORDINANCE NO. 6XX
EXHIBIT “A”
Following are the approved amendments to the Official Zoning Map
Ordinance No. 644 – Rezoning the Monticello Middle School plat from A-O
to R-1
Ordinance No. 645 – Rezoning the Pinewood Elementary parcels from A-O to
R-1
Ordinance No. 649 – Rezoning the Monticello High School to Planned Unit
Development
Ordinance No. 650 – Rezoning the Mills Fleet Farm plat from B-4 to Planned
Unit Development
Ordinance No. 651 – Rezoning from B-2 to Planned Unit Development for
Lot 1, Block 2, Oakwood Industrial Park (Red Rooster)
Ordinance No. 655 – Rezoning to from B-4 to B-3 for Camping World
Ordinance No. 656 – Rezoning from B-4 to B-3 for Lot 1, Block 1, 90th Street
Addition (Moon Motors)
County Hwy 75
Chelse
a
R
d
State Hwy 2585th St NE90th St NELinn StPine St7th St
School Blvd
Riverview Dr
Cedar StW Rive
r
S
t
Marvin
Rd
Jason Ave
Dundas Rd
W Bro
a
d
w
a
y
S
t
Hart
B
l
v
d
Country LaHaug Ave NEElm StW 4th
S
t
Fenning Ave NEOakwook DrMallard La
95th St NE
Fallon Ave NEEdmonson Ave NEMississipp
i
D
r
5th St
Co
u
n
t
r
y
C
l
u
b
R
d
Sandberg RdPelican LaFalcon Dr
Fenning AveWalnut StOak Ridge DrOriole LaClub View Rd
Bro
a
d
w
a
y
S
t
Hillcrest Rd
E River
S
t
Headman
L
a
Mi
l
l
Tra
i
l
LaFalcon Ave NEWright StBenton StElwood RdRamsey St6th St
River Mill Dr
Wildwood Way
Hilltop Dr
Mill Run Rd
Oak View La
Farmstead AveMartin Dr
4th St E
3rd St
E
Red Rock LaGillard Ave NEMaple StFallon DrWillow StView La EGrey Stone AveMar
v
i
n
E
l
w
o
o
d
R
d
Fiel
d
c
r
e
s
t
C
i
rFairway DrJason
A
v
e
N
EVine StMeadow La
Jerr
y
L
i
e
f
e
r
t
D
r
Praire Rd
Starling DrPalm StUnknown or No StreetnameFallon AveGolf Course Rd
Falcon AveKevin Longley Dr Craig LaRed Oak LaFront
S
t
5th St
W
Thomas Park DrLocust StMockingbird La
W 3rd
S
t
Eastwood CirBriar Oaks Blvd
F
a
rm
s
t
e
a
d
D
r Henipin StEider LaDayton StOak L
a
River Forest Dr
Meadow Oak Ave
Kampa Cir
Oak R
idge
C
ir
Mill Ct
River Ridge La
Garrison AveOakvi
e
w
C
tDundas CirKenneth LaOtter Creek RdMinnesota StEagle CirCrocus LaMe
a
d
o
w
O
a
k
L
a
Stone Ridge DrChestnut St120th St NE
Dar
r
o
w
A
v
e
N
E
Diamond Dr
Pebble Brook Dr
Widgeon LaWashington StBunker CirHomestead DrThomas CirEn
d
i
co
t
t
T
rCenter CirOak View CirSandtrap CirCountry Cir
Cheyen Ct
Ol
d
T
e
r
r
i
t
o
r
a
l
R
d
Tanager CirHillcrest CirOsprey Ct
Ac
o
r
n
C
i
rBalboul CirS
w
a
l
l
o
w
C
i
r
Riverside Cir
Meadow Oak CtMatthew CirE Oak DrStone Ridge CirOakwood DrMeadow Oak Ave NECo
u
n
t
y
H
w
y
7
5
Hart
B
l
v
dMarvin RdMarvin RdWright St90th St NECedar StMinnesota St01
02
03
04
City of MonticelloOfficial Zoning Map
01-23-17
:Legend
BASE ZONING DISTRICTS
Industrial Districts
IBC
I-1
I-2
Residential Districts
-- Low Residential Densities
A-O
R-A
R-1
Business Districts
B-1
B-2
B-3
B-4
CCD-- Medium Residential Densities
T-N
R-2
R-PUD
-- High Residential Densities
R-3
R-4
M-H
OTHER
Water
Mississippi Wild, Scenic & Rec Overlay District
OVERLAY DISTRICTS
Performance Based Overlay District
!!!!!!!!!!!!Shoreland District
Special Use Overlay District
!!!!!!!!!!!!Freeway Bonus Sign District
Mills Fleet Farm03
Red Rooster04
PUDs
Swan River01
Monticello
High School02
!"b$
?¾A@
92 n d S t N e
9 1 s t S t N eState Highway 25 SRiverForestD r Ne
Fenni
ng Ave NeG o l f C o u r s e R dMatthew Cir6th St WAlpineDr
Heron CtWillow StElmStBunker CirI
n
n
s
b
r
o
o
k
C
t Chestnut StSwa
l
l
ow Ci
r
99th S t N e
PelicanLnA l p i n e C t
BisonAveFarmstead CtDeer CirTanager CirElkAveFoxStEakern AvePar
kP
lace
Dr
Crocus
Cir
WoodcrestCtMount C urve Blvd
4th St W
M c k e n n a C t
GatewaterDrMaple StOakr i d g e D r
89 t h StNe Gillard AveM i l l C tN eVine StC
o
u
nt
r
y
AveOttercreekRdBa d g er C i r
Endic
ottTrlR i v e r S t W
C o u n t r y C i r
Woodla
n
d
C
t
TalonCt
T
r
o
y
MarquetteDrR edf ordLnFieldcres
tCir HaugA
veNe
8 6 t h S t N e
EiseleAveNeEiderLnBakk en St
9 3 r d St N eNicholas Cir8 2 n d S t N e
Or
char
dCirEHawt
hor
ne
Pl
SD u n d a s R d
S
a
n
d
TrapCirChelsea Rd W
Deeg a n C t
M e a d o w OakAv e N e
O r i o l e LnWidgeon LnD e e r S t
W i n d e m e r e C t
O a k l e a f C tOakviewCirPrairie R d
Harvest Ct Mill
Trail L n N e
D i a m o n d D r
P a r k D rPrescottDrLinn StSum
mit
Ct
B a d g e r S tWalnut StHart BlvdMinnesota St9 2 n d S t N e
StateHighway25NeSandbergRd10 2 n d S t N e5thStW
MeadowOakDrRiver St E
Walnut St S3rd St ELocust StHennepin StRamsey StWright StRiver St W FrontSt
3rd St W
S c h o o l B l v d
C h e l s e a R dPalm StG
o
l
denPon d LnNew StDundas CirWashingtonStO v e rlo o kLnBrentwood
Dr
83 r d St N eInnsbrookDr7thStE
T e r r i toria
l
Rd9 0 t h S t N eGillard Ave NeI
c
k
l
erAveNeVineLnOakviewCtCraigLnKennethLn
TroyMarquetteLnS a v a n n a h A v e
BearAv
e
BrightonAveNeOakwood Dr E
M e a dowOakLnNe8 5 t h S t N e EbersoleAveHalsey Ave NeS t a r l i n g D r
4th St E
K a mp
aCirB r i a r O a kes
BlvdHalsey Ave NeGoodrichDrNe
Pinehur stCtCahillAveNeMallard L nGraystoneAve
9 0 t h S t N e
7 7 t h S t N eEagleCt Ide Ave NeH o m e steadD r9
6thSt N e
OakRidgeCirDalton
W
ay
97th St Ne
J
erry L i e f e r t D r
Orchard Ln Stoner i dg e
Ln8 7 t h S t N e
G
a
rveyCt
Kevin Longley Dr
Hamline Ave NeRiver vi e w D r N e
1 2 3 r d S t N e
IbsonAveNeAetnaAve
NeDa
rlin
gto
n
AveNeGiffortAveNeD
altonCt DaltonAveNeH i l l t op Dr
PrivateDrPine St8 7 t h S t Ne EastwoodCi r N e
RedOak Ln N e
A f ton
A
veNeHayw a r d CtSMarvinElwood
RdHayward Ct N
Sandy Ln
M o c kingbirdLnF a l l on
DrHarrington Ave Ne88 t h S t N eCrocusLn
E a g l e R i d
geLnPrairieCreek LnR e dRockLnFarmsteadAveRiver Mill Dr N e
Edmonson Ave NeC l u b V i e w Dr
W o o d s id e D rOakv ie w L nMeridianAveN
Davern Ave NeDarrow Ave Ne9 4 t h S t NeHighlandWay
Wi
ldwood
Wa y
7 9 t h S t N e
C o u n t y R o a d 3 7 N e84thStNe
Oakri
d
geDrNFallonAveNeW eston
D
r
M a r t i n Dr
97th St Ne
Fair hillLnMarvi
n RdHed
manLnSpruceDr
101st St N eT h o m a s P a r k D r
E a s t O a k D
r107th St Ne
F a l c o n A v eDeeganAve119thStNe
H illcr e s t Rd
C o u n t y R o a d 3 9 NeA
b
e
r
t
Av
e
NeCedarSt8 4 t h S t N eGilbertAveNe
80 t h S t N e
WbI94ToPineSt
C a m e r o n A v e N e
102ndSt Ne
DaltonAve N e11
0th S t Ne
E
a
kernCir N e9 5 t h S t N e HallA v e N eGoodrichAveNe116 th S t N e
E Broadway St
P i n e S t T o E b I94
Chamberl
ain Ave NeC o u n t y R o a d 3 9 N e
Cam eron Ave N eEb I94 ToPine
St
AetnaAveNeMillR u n Rd
Mississippi Dr Ne
Pine St T o W b I 9 4
AcaciaAveN
eJaber Ave NeF e n n in g A ve Ne To E b I 9 4
7th St
W
ChelseaRd
H
a
mil to n AveNe8 5 t h S t N e
Garrison Ave NeW b I94T
o
F
e
n
ningAve Ne
1 2 0 t h S t N e
12 7 t h S t N e
Bradd ock AveNe7 5 t h S t N e
1 0 0 t h S t N e
County Road 75 Ne
8 0 t h S t N e
WBroadway St
DavidsonAveNeJason Ave Ne
8 5 t h S t N e
AcaciaAv
e
Ne HardingAveNeBria
r
w
o
o
d
A
v
eNeCounty Road 75
IffertAveNeInterstate94
1 inch = 1,500 feet
Floodway
Fl ood Fr inge
500-Year Floodplain
DNR Protected Waters
Wild and Scenic Boundary
Shoreland Setback
DNR Watercourse
City Boundary
²
Date: 2/12/2014
Source: WSB, Northwest Associated Consultants, City of Monticello, and Wright CountyMap date: April 2014
20 PARCELSAVAILABLE:67 ACRES
8 PARCELSAVAILABLE:41 ACRES
0 0.5 1 1.5 20.25 Miles ¯"Places toWork"Land Uses
"Places toLive"Land Uses
"Places forCommunity"Land Uses
MonticelloRoller Rink
28 PARCELS TOTAL AVAILABLE:108 ACRES
Schools
Parks
Sensitive Land Uses
Residential Parcels
Legend
City Boundary
Parcels
ROW
Water
Industrial Parcels
2014 Adult Land Use Analysis
Adult Use Parcels Available in Industrial/Special Use Overlay District Areas
Industrial District/Special Use OverlayParcels Not Abutting Sensitive Uses
Planning Commission Agenda – 02/07/2017
1
3A. Consideration of a request for simple subdivision resulting in two buildable
parcels in the R-1 (Single-Family Residence) District to facilitate right of way for
7th Street/Fallon Avenue, per City Ordinance Title 11, Chapter 1, Section 7
Applicant: City of Monticello (NAC)
Property: Legal: Lot 1, Block 1, Church of St. Henry
PID: 155115001010
Planning Case Number: 2017 - 004
A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND
Request(s): Subdivision of a parcel to accommodate the City’s
acquisition of right of way for the 7th Street/Fallon
Avenue roundabout.
Deadline for Decision: March 18th, 2017
Land Use Designation: Places to Live/Places for Community
Zoning Designation: R-1, Single Residence District
The purpose of the "R-1" single family district is to
provide for low density, single family, detached
residential dwelling units and directly related
complementary uses.
Overlays/Environmental
Regulations Applicable: Freeway Bonus Sign Overlay District
Current Site Use: Vacant/Open Space
Surrounding Land Uses:
North: Single Family Residential
East: Church of St. Henry
South: Interstate 94 - Industrial
West: Multiple Family Residential
Project Description: The parcel in question is the northwesterly most of
several parcels that comprise the Church of St. Henr y
campus. The parcel fronts on a portion of 7th Street,
and is situated at the location where the Fallon Avenue
overpass with intersect with 7th Street at a planned
roundabout. The City proposes to acquire a portion of
the subject parcel to accommodate right of way for the
Planning Commission Agenda – 02/07/2017
2
roundabout project. The Church would retain the
residual parcel adjacent to the remainder of the campus.
ANALYSIS
As noted above, the City is seeking to acquire a portion of an existing parcel,
part of the Church of St. Henry plat. The parcel is question is 6.8 acres in
area, and the City would acquire approximately 1.7 acres of that parcel for
right of way purposes, with the remaining 5.1 acres remaining with the
church.
The Subdivision Ordinance, in Section 11-1-7, provides for simple
subdivision of lots that are currently platted and do not create more than one
new building lot. The Ordinance allows for such “simple subdivisions” to
proceed without requiring a full plat or the normal public hearing
requirements that larger subdivisions entail.
Such subdivisions result in a “metes and bounds” description, essentially
describing parts of the underlying platted lots. Occasionally, the County
Recorder determines that the new descriptions are not recordable. While staff
does not anticipate that likelihood in this case, in that were to occur, a plat
would be required, and the applicants would need to reapply for a platted
subdivision.
The Subdivision Ordinance permits non-platted subdivisions under this
exception to the general platting requirement:
(A) In the case of a request to divide a lot which is part of an
existing lot of record where the division is to permit the
adding of a parcel of land to an abutting lot or to create two
lots and the newly created property line will not cause the
other remaining portion of the lot to be in violation with
this ordinance or the zoning ordinance, except that no such
division of a lot or parcel shall be permitted when said
division shall create a lot or parcel that is in violation of
Chapter 8, Subdivision 11-8-2, of this ordinance.
For reference, Section 11-8-2 prohibits non-platted subdivisions
creating more than 2 new parcels, and requires compliance with
zoning standards as a qualification for the platting exception.
The proposed subdivision is consistent with these principals, in that
the newly created parcel will be utilized for right of way on the west
(only public improvements would be made on this portion of the
subdivision). For the remaining 5.1 acre parcel being retained by the
church, the property would remain in its existing condition. Future
Planning Commission Agenda – 02/07/2017
3
uses by the church, if proposed, would be subject to the normal zoning
process, and would not be affected the subdivision.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. PC 2017- 005 recommending approval of the
simple subdivision for the City of Monticello and the Church of St. Henry, subject
to the conditions in Exhibit Z.
2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution No. PC-2017-005, based on findings to be
cited at the Planning Commission meeting.
3. Motion to table action on the resolution, subject to additional information.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the subdivision, based on findings that the proposed
subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the requirements of the
Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, as well as compliance with the conditions
identified in Exhibit Z.
D. SUPPORTING DATA
A. Resolution PC-2017-005
B. Aerial Image, Subject Site
C. Subdivision Illustration and Legal Description
Z. Conditions of Approval
Planning Commission Agenda – 02/07/2017
4
EXHIBIT Z
Simple Subdivision
Lot 1, Block 1, Church of St. Henry Addition
Conditions of approval for the proposed Simple Subdivision:
1. Conveyance of the 1.7 acre parcel from the current owner to the City of Monticello.
2. In the event the County rejects the descriptions of the metes and bounds subdivision,
the applicant will need to re-apply and utilize a formal plat process.
3. Compliance with the requirements of the City Engineer regarding easements, grading,
drainage, and utilities.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. PC-2017-005
1
Motion By: Seconded By:
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A SIMPLE SUBDIVISION RESULTING IN
CONFORMING BUILDABLE PARCELS IN THE R-1 ZONING DISTRICT TO
PROVIDE RIGHT OF WAY FOR CITY STREET IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to resubdivide a platted lot in the
R-1 zoning district; and
WHEREAS, the resultant parcels will meet or exceed the requirements of the R-1
zoning district; and
WHEREAS, the property is designated as “Places to Live” and “Places for
Community” on the Comprehensive Plan land use map; and
WHEREAS, the subdivision will be consistent with the existing and future land uses
of the surrounding area; and
WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision meets the qualifying requirements for non-
platted subdivisions according to the Monticello Subdivision Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the item at an open meeting on
February 7th, 2017 and the applicant and members of the public were provided the
opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the
staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following
Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval:
1. The resubdivision is consistent with the requirements of the zoning and
subdivision ordinances.
2. The resubdivision will be consistent with the existing and future land uses in the
area.
3. The subdivision, together with the conditions of approval recommended in the
staff report on the item, will accommodate expected land uses for the neighborhood.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
Monticello City Council approves the subdivision subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z
as follows:
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. PC-2017-005
2
1. Conveyance of the 1.7 acre parcel from the current owner to the City of Monticello.
2. In the event the County rejects the descriptions of the metes and bounds subdivision,
the applicant will need to re-apply and utilize a formal plat process.
3. Compliance with the requirements of the City Engineer regarding easements, grading,
drainage, and utilities.
ADOPTED this 7th day of February, 2017, by the Planning Commission of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota.
MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
By: _______________________________
Brad Fyle, Chair
ATTEST:
____________________________________________
Angela Schumann, Community Development Director
City of Mon ticello - R equ est for Simple Su bd ivisio n
Lot 1, Block 1, Church of St. Henry 1st Addition | PID 155-115-001010
C reated by : C ity of Monticello
385 ft
CHU
R
C
H
O
F
ST.
H
E
N
R
Y
CHURCH OF ST. HENRY
1ST ADDITION
Parcel Sketch
Option Number 3B
City of Monticello, Minnesota
WSB Project No. 01494-480 Date: 6/14/16
Option Number 3B Fee Taking Description
That part of Lot 1, Block 1, CHURCH OF ST. HENRY, according to the
recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the
following described line:
Commencing at the most northerly corner of said Lot 1, thence on
an assumed bearing of South 69 degrees 22 minutes 36 seconds
East, along the northerly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 110.93 feet
to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South
06 degrees 04 minutes 52 seconds West a distance of 105.10 feet;
thence South 07 degrees 19 minutes 58 seconds East a distance of
225.34 feet; thence South 01 degrees 14 minutes 50 seconds East a
distance of 94.63 feet to the southwesterly line of said Lot 1 and
said line there terminating.K:\01494-480\Survey\Easements\Option Number 3B\ESMT EXBT-Option Number 3B.dwg
Planning Commission Agenda – 02/07/17
3B.Consideration of Recommendation for Appointment of Planning
Commissioner (AS)
A.REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The Planning Commission is asked to consider recommendation on the
appointment for the vacant position on the Commission.
Prior to the regular meeting, the Commission will have had the opportunity to
interview candidate(s) for the position. The recommended candidate will serve
the balance of former Commissioner Buchmann’s term, which expires at the end
of 2017. A listing of the terms is provided below for reference. The
Commissioner’s terms are staggered in three year increments.
Linda Buchmann (OPEN)3 yr 12/2017 appointed 1/12/15
Sam Murdoff 3 yr 12/2017 appointed 1/12/15
Brad Fyle, Chair 3 yr 12/2016
Marc Simpson 3 yr 12/2016 appointed 6/08/15
Lucas Wynne 3 yr 12/2018 Appointed 9/12/16
Charlotte Gabler
Council
liaison
The Commission’s recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council on
February 13th, 2017.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1.Motion to recommend appointment of _______________ to fill out the
remainder of a three-year term on the Planning Commission.
2. Motion of other.
C. SUPPORTING DATA:
A.City Code Title 2, Chapter 1 - Planning Commission
MONTICELLO CITY CODE TITLE 2 / Chapter 1 / Page 1
CHAPTER 1
PLANNING COMMISSION
SECTION:
2-1-1: Name of the Commission
2-1-2: Authorization
2-1-3: Membership
2-1-4: Term of Office
2-1-5: Attendance
2-1-6: Vacancy
2-1-7: Officers
2-1-8: Meetings
2-1-9: Quorum
2-1-10: Duties of the Commission
2-1-11: Amendments
2-1-12: Compensation
2-1-1: NAME OF THE COMMISSION: The name of the organization shall be the
Monticello Planning Commission.
2-1-2: AUTHORIZATION: The authorization for the establishment of this commission
is set forth under Minnesota Statutes, Section 462, Municipal Planning Enabling
Act. The planning commission is hereby designated the planning agency of the
City pursuant to the Municipal Planning Act.
2-1-3: MEMBERSHIP: The Planning Commission shall consist of five members
appointed by the Council. All members shall be residents of the City of
Monticello and shall have equal rights and privileges.
2-1-4: TERM OF OFFICE:
(A) Appointments. All members shall be appointed for three year terms
ending on December 31st of a given year; however, said term may be
terminated earlier by the Council. Terms shall be staggered so that no
more than two members’ terms shall expire in a given year. Said terms are
to commence on the day of appointment by Council. Every appointed
member shall, before entering upon the discharge of his duties, take an
oath that he/she will faithfully discharge the duties of office.
(B) Renewals. When an expiring member’s term is up, such member may be
reappointed by Council with the effective date of the new term beginning
on the first day of the next year following the expiration.
MONTICELLO CITY CODE TITLE 2 / Chapter 1 / Page 2
2-1-5: ATTENDANCE: It is the City Council’s intention to encourage Planning
Commission members to attend all Planning Commission meetings. Should any
Planning Commission member be absent for more than three meetings in a
calendar year, that member may be subject to replacement by the City Council.
2-1-6: VACANCY: Any vacancy in the regular or at-large membership shall be filled
by the City Council, and such appointee shall serve for the unexpired term so
filled.
2-1-7: OFFICERS:
(A) Elections. The City Planning Commission shall elect at its January
meeting from its membership a chair, vice chair, and a secretary who shall
serve for a term of one year and shall have such powers as may be
prescribed in the rules of said Commission.
(B) Duties of Chair. The chair shall preside at all meetings of the Planning
Commission and shall have the duties normally conferred and
parliamentary usage of such officers.
(C) Duties of Vice Chair. The vice chair shall act for the chair in his absence.
(D) Duties of Secretary. A secretary may be appointed who is not a member
of the Planning Commission but can be employed as a member of city
staff. The secretary shall keep the minutes and records of the
Commission; and with the assistance of staff as is available shall prepare
the agenda of the regular and special meetings for Commission members,
arrange proper and legal notice of hearings when necessary, attend to
correspondence of the Commission, and handle other duties as are
normally carried out by a secretary.
2-1-8: MEETINGS:
(A) The Planning Commission shall hold at least one regular meeting each
month. This meeting shall be held on the first Tuesday. Regular meetings
shall commence at 6:00 p.m. Hearings shall be heard as soon thereafter as
possible. The Planning Commission shall adopt rules for the transaction
of business and shall keep a record of its resolutions, transactions, and
findings, which record shall be a public record. The meeting shall be open
to the general public.
(B) In the event of conflict for a regularly-scheduled meeting date, a majority
at any meeting may change the date, time and location of the meeting.
(C) Special meetings may be called by the Chair or two members of the
Planning Commission together, as needed, and shall be coordinated with
MONTICELLO CITY CODE TITLE 2 / Chapter 1 / Page 3
city staff.
2-1-9: QUORUM: A majority of all voting Planning Commission members shall
constitute a quorum for the transaction of business.
2-1-10: DUTIES OF THE COMMISSION: The Commission has the powers and duties
assigned to it under Minnesota Statutes, Section 462, Municipal Planning
Enabling Act, by this Code, and state law.
2-1-11: AMENDMENTS: This ordinance may be amended as recommended by the
majority vote of the existing membership of the Planning Commission and only
after majority vote of the City Council.
2-1-12: COMPENSATION: Compensation of members of the Commission shall be as
set forth in City Code for Fee Schedule.
(#336, 11/22/99) (#337, 1/10/11) (#593, 3/10/14)
(#607, 1/26/15)
Planning Commission Agenda: 2/07/17
1
3C. Community Development Director’s Report.
1.Planning Commission Recommendations
The City Council took the following action at its meeting of January 23rd, 2017 as related to
items on the January agenda of the Planning Commission:
•Consideration to amend the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapters and Subsections
as follows. Applicant: City of Monticello
•Chapter 2, Section 4(F) – Site Plan Applications
•Chapter 3, Section 4(E) – R-1: Single Family Residence District
•Chapter 3, Section 4(F) – R-2: Single and Two Family Residence District
•Chapter 4, Section 1(H) – Standards for Site Landscaping
•Chapter 4, Section 1(J) – Zoning District Specific Landscaping Standards
•Chapter 4, Section 5(J) – District Regulations
•Chapter 4, Section 8(E) – Standards Applicable to All Uses
•Chapter 5, Section 2(D) – Regulations for Civic and Institutional Uses
•Chapter 5, Section 2(F) – Regulations for Commercial Uses
•Chapter 5, Section 3(B) – General Standards and Limitations for
Accessory Uses and Structures
•Chapter 5, Section 4(E) - Specific Standards for Temporary Uses
•Chapter 8, Section 2(B) – Lots
City Council approved the ordinance amendment unanimously as part of the
consent agenda.
2.Downtown Small Area Study Update
The first meeting of the committee is scheduled for Thursday, February 9th at 4:00 PM at the
Monticello Community Center, Academy Room. Attached are documents providing further
reference on the small area planning effort for downtown.
After the neighborhood and consultants have studied the neighborhood and talked to residents, they produce a report to be added as an addendum to the comprehensive plan. Th is report includes a survey of existing condi-tions and the goals and and objectives for the neighborhood. Additionally, the plan includes an implementation section that outlines the steps the neighborhood should take over the next ten years to achieve the goals.What is a small area plan?Neighborhood Master PlanStation Area PlanCorridor PlanTypes of small area plansWhat does a small area plan consider?A small area plan assesses the existing conditions of these categories and makes recommendations for how they can be improved over the life of the plan. It understands them as deeply interconnected and connects all categories to the larger goals for the plan.Quality and aff ordability of the housing stockWhere to focus new developmentViability of public spacesUrban character and designNatural resource pro-tection and integrationCultural expressionCondition of infrastruc-tureFriendliness of streets for all types of transpor-tationA small area plan is a policy document that establishes a long-range vision for land use and development for an area and formulates specifi c goals and projects to implement that vision. It functions as a supplement to the city’s comprehensive plan, providing fi ner detail on citywide goals and policies. Th e small area planning process typically begins when a neighborhood identifi es a need for long-term planning in the area and contacts the city. Th ey then bring in a planning and design consultant to assist in soliciting neighborhood participation, developing the goals, and writing the plan. Finally, the plan passes through a series of city approvals before becoming adopted into the citywide plan.What is the product of a small area plan?
CITY OF MONTICELLO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
505 Walnut Street, Suite 1
Monticello, MN 55362
Phone: (763) 295-2711 Fax: (753) 295-4404
Downtown Monticello developed as a place for residents and visitors to come together for commerce
and recreation. Located in the historic area of the city and along the Mississippi River, our downtown
is a unique neighborhood at the heart of Monticello. The downtown area has also been a central focus
of planning efforts to recapture its vibrancy as a place for all people to enjoy its amenities.
In 2010, the City of Monticello completed a guide to redeveloping downtown called the “Embracing
Downtown Plan”. The plan considered land use, transportation and market realities for the area
considered to be “Downtown Monticello,” extending from Interstate I-94 at its southern boundary to
the Mississippi River in the north, and generally from Cedar Street on the east to Maple Street on the
west.
Since the adoption of the Embracing Downtown Plan, changes in the downtown marketplace have
impacted the desire and ability to implement the land use part of the Embracing Downtown Plan as it
was originally intended. In particular, the core downtown area requires a new perspective in terms of
land uses most likely to be developed and successful.
The City of Monticello Economic Development Authority (EDA) recently authorized a small area
study of the core downtown area. The study is designed to:
Give revised land use direction to the core of downtown while supporting the overall
direction of 2010 Embracing Monticello
Offer a fresh look at the current market conditions, how they have changed since 2010, and
what the popular trends are.
Celebrate, strengthen and leverage the authenticity of Downton Monticello, its unique
position in the region, and its existing amenities.
Create a usable plan that’s easy to read and exists in multiple formats.
Inspire investment with a planning process that focuses on practical solutions and existing
market potential.
The EDA is working with the Cuningham Group to accomplish this through a revised land use plan
for the core downtown area.
An essential part of the study’s planning process is a steering committee with ten representatives
from City of Monticello commissions, the Monticello Chamber of Commerce, and interested
citizens. Several public engagement sessions will also be held for residents and visitors to provide
their thoughts and visions for the downtown. The steering committee and public engagement sessions
will help guide the direction and evolution of the plan from start to completion, an anticipated
timeline of February – June 2017.
If you are interested in staying updated with the progress of the small area study or have any
questions, please contact Jacob Thunander at jacob.thunander@ci.monticello.mn.us.
Small Area Study – Downtown, Monticello