2010-2014 Capital Improvement Plan2010-2014
CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT
PLAN
Adopted: December 14, 2009
F-1
The Capital Improvement Program
Annually, the City of Monticello devotes a large portion of the budget to capital projects.
The large financial investment is required to maintain and expand public facilities and
infrastructure. Ongoing service delivery can be assured only if adequate consideration is
given to capital needs. If the City fails to maintain its capital stock, facilities and
infrastructure will deteriorate until costly, constant maintenance is required, services are
threatened, and the community growth stagnates or even declines. Whether the City is
growing, stable, or losing population, it needs to plan and budget for capital assets
carefully to maintain existing infrastructure and meet future demand. A Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) is a tool that can help ensure that decisions on capital
projects and funding are made wisely and are well planned.
What is a capital asset and a capital project? For the City of Monticello a capital asset is
defined as a new or rehabilitated physical asset that is nonrecurring, has a useful life
expectancy of greater than one year and a cost of $5,000 or more. A capital project is
undertaken to acquire a capital asset. Examples of capital projects include construction
of public buildings, major street improvements, and acquisition of fire trucks.
A CIP is a multi-year plan, identifying capital projects to be funded during the planning
period. The capital program identifies each proposed capital project to be undertaken, the
year in which it will be started or acquired, the amount expected to be expended on the
project each year, and the proposed method of financing these expenditures.
The CIP helps to build consensus on what are the most important projects, thus helping to
ensure these projects get undertaken first. The CIP also provides a picture of future
financing requirements, which will allow the City to better align financial resources with
future needs. Additionally, the CIP provides an important tool for growth management.
The CIP should not be confused with the capital improvement budget. The capital
improvement budget represents the first year of the CIP. The capital budget is the City's
annual appropriation for capital spending and is legally adopted by the City Council. The
capital budget authorizes specific projects and appropriates specific funding for those
projects. Projects and financing sources listed in the CIP for years other than year I
(called the "out years") are not authorized until the annual budget for those years is
legally adopted. The out years serve only as a guide for future planning and are subject
to further review and modification in subsequent years.
Purpose of the CIP
The CIP serves a number of important functions for the City, as described below.
A Formal Mechanism for Decision Making. A basic function of the CIP is to provide
the City of Monticello with an orderly process for planning and budgeting for capital
needs. Questions on what to buy, build, or repair; where and when to buy or build; and
F-2
how much to spend are all dealt with during the CIP process. The City Council and staff
must agree on the policies that will shape the program, estimate capital needs, prioritize
those needs, identify and schedule funding sources, implement projects, and monitor
project delivery. All of these activities are organized through the CIP process.
A Link to a Long -Range Plan. The CIP serves as a link to the City's planning process
and should be developed in concert with the comprehensive land use plan, strategic plan,
or other long-range plans. Preparation of the CIP considers not only repair and
replacement of existing infrastructure but also facilities that are expected to be needed in
the future. Changing population and employment patterns, socioeconomic and
demographic characteristics of community residents, and land use patterns may bring
about the need for new roads, water and sewer facilities, public buildings, or other capital
assets. In developing the CIP, these new demands are weighed against the need to
maintain existing infrastructure, based on goals established through the City's planning
process.
Financial Management Tool. An overriding consideration in developing the CIP is to
prioritize current and future needs to fit within the anticipated level of financial resources.
CIP considers not only what the City needs but, equally important, what it can afford. By
explicitly recognizing the City's financial outlook and the revenues and financing
mechanisms that will be available for the capital program, projects can be prioritized to
ensure that the most important needs and goals of the City are achieved. Moreover,
better planning can be undertaken with regard to the scope and timing of capital projects.
Developing a financially constrained CIP based on realistic estimates of revenues to be
available enhances the ability of the CIP to serve as a planning and management tool
rather than a wish list of projects that cannot be fully implemented.
A Reporting Document. The CIP document presents a description of proposed projects
that will be undertaken over the five-year plan. This document communicates to
residents, businesses, and other interested parties the City's capital priorities and plans for
implementing projects. It also includes the expected source of funding for projects,
including use of bond proceeds, installment purchase contracts or other debt, reserves,
and grant funding. Thus, the community has a better understanding of the City's plan for
capital spending and can make decisions accordingly.
Advantages of a Capital Improvement Program
A CIP requires staff time for its development, implementation, and maintenance;
however, the advantages of a CIP should not be overlooked. Some of the major
advantages of a CIP are cited in the following paragraphs.
A CIP Focuses Attention on City Goals, Needs, and Financial Capability. Through
the CIP process, decision makers select projects that will be consistent with community
goals and needs. As part of the process, the City Council, Staff and citizens consider the
current and future outlook for community development and the services needed by
residents and businesses. This outlook serves as a basis for determining infrastructure
F-3
and equipment needs to be included in the capital program. An important aspect of
developing the CIP is balancing the City's needs with its ability to pay for them. The
process thus focuses attention on the financial capability of the government over the long
term. Consistency of projects with community goals and needs provides a way to select
among competing projects for the limited financial resources available to the City.
A CIP Builds Public Consensus for Projects and Improves Community Awareness.
An important component of the CIP process is the involvement of citizens in the selection
and prioritization of projects. Public participation helps to build support for capital
projects that are both popular and unpopular. The public gains a better understanding of
community needs and capital projects through the process and thus are more likely to
support the capital program. Moreover, the CIP process serves to educate citizens on the
capital costs associated with City goals, such as economic development. Through the
CIP process, the City is able to gain greater insight into the costs residents are willing to
bear for these activities. Once approved, the CIP document informs citizen groups,
developers, and others of the City's planned public improvements. These groups are then
better equipped to plan their own activities and are less likely to pressure for funding of
projects not included in the plan.
A CIP Improves Inter -/Intergovernmental Cooperation and Communication. A CIP
enhances coordination of capital improvements among departments and agencies both
within and outside the City. As a result, fewer scheduling problems and fewer
overlapping or conflicting projects are likely to occur. The CIP also serves to inform
other local governments of planned capital activity, thus affording them an opportunity to
coordinate related project funding and timing. By promoting intergovernmental
communication, the CIP helps eliminate project duplication efforts. Capital projects
therefore can be planned in conjunction with other government units to best serve the
interests of the community as a whole rather than the interest of the City.
A CIP Avoids Waste of Resources. With its multiyear focus, capital improvement
programming helps to avoid costly errors resulting from citizen opposition to projects,
failure to anticipate linkages with other projects or activities, or insufficient funding.
Because capital projects are considered over several years, the City is better able to forge
consensus on the need for projects before funds are spent. The multiyear focus also
encourages consideration of how different phases of a project must be scheduled, given
available funding, in order to complete the project as planned. Finally, the CIP allows the
City to anticipate future facility needs and to develop a financing approach that meets
those needs.
A CIP Helps to Ensure Financial Stability. By anticipating the fiscal resources that are
necessary to pay for capital projects, the CIP can help to promote financial stability.
Capital projects are prioritized and scheduled to fit within expected funding levels,
thereby limiting the need for dramatic tax increases or unanticipated bond issues in any
one year. In addition, by systematically addressing capital needs, the City is less likely to
be faced with the need to divert resources from other programs to make unanticipated
capital expenditures.
F-4
Evaluating Capital Projects
Often the City will find that the list of potential capital projects and purchases far exceeds
the available funding. Yet, choosing among them is likely to be difficult. Capital
projects are proposed to support different City goals and often benefit particular
constituent groups. A methodology is needed both to pare down the list of projects to an
affordable level and to balance diverse and sometimes competing community values and
needs. The following project evaluation criterion was developed for this purpose.
All capital improvement projects and equipment purchases will be evaluated on the
criteria below with a priority factor of 0 to 5. Each evaluation criteria is weighted based
on importance. The priority factor is multiplied by the weight factor to arrive at a criteria
score. The scores are added together to achieve a priority ranking.
Public Health & Safety: Weight Factor of 1.50. Does the project or
purchase improve the well being of the general public? A priority factor of zero
would be it does not affect the well being of the general public and a priority
factor of 5 would be it very much affects the well being of the general public.
Employee Health & Safety: Weight Factor of 1.25. Does the project or
purchase improve the well being of City employees? A priority factor of zero
would be it does not affect the well being of employees and a priority factor of 5
would be it very much affects the well being of employees.
Regulatory Mandate: Weight Factor of 1.50. Is the project or purchase required
by a Federal, State, or other governing body mandate? A priority factor of zero
would be there is no mandate requiring the project or purchase and a priority
factor of 5 would be there is a current mandate. A rating in between would mean
there is a mandate that will take place but there is a time period before the City
must comply.
Frequent Problem: Weight Factor of 1.25. Are there frequent problems or
issues that require the project to be completed? Problems could be that the street
requires frequent patching or equipment needs repairs or the design of something
causes frequent accidents. A priority factor of zero would be no problems, while
a priority rating of 5 would be frequent problems or issues.
Ability to Finance: Weight Factor of 1.00. Does the City have the ability to pay
for the project or equipment purchase? A priority factor of zero would mean there
is no funding available to finance the project or purchase and a rating of 5 would
mean the City has the funds available to finance the project or purchase. Other
items to consider would if funds are not currently available, how easily would it
be to fund the project in the future?
F-5
Cost of the Project: Weight Factor of 1.00. What is the total cost of the project
or equipment purchase? The higher the cost of the project the lower the priority
factor rating would be. For example a project costing $5,000 may have a priority
factor of 5, where as a project costing $5,000,000 may have a rating of zero.
Generates Fees or Revenues: Weight Factor of 1.20. By constructing the project
or purchasing the asset can the City generate funds? An example might be that
construction of a gazebo in a park could generate rental of the park by the public
thus bring funds into the City's budget. Priority factor of zero would be no fees
or revenues would be generated from the project or purchase and a rating of 5
would be a large amount of funds could be generated.
Generates Cost Savings: Weight Factor of 1.20. Does the project or purchase
result in reduced expenditures for maintenance or repairs? For example repaving
a street may result in reduced cost for patching material. The higher the cost
savings the higher the priority factor would be.
Ongoing Operations Cost: Weight Factor of 1.00. Is there any ongoing future
operation cost due to the project or purchase? For example, the construction of a
new City building would have annual electric and gas costs to operate the facility
along with other operating costs. The priority factor would be a 5 for a project
that has no impact on future operating costs and zero for a project or purchase that
has a large future operating budget cost impact.
Age or condition of Existing: Weight Factor of 1.00. If the City has an existing
asset that is being replaced, what is the age or condition of the existing asset? A
very old asset that is very poor condition would have a priority factor of 5.
Public Benefit: Weight Factor of 1.10. Does the project or purchase provide any
benefit to the general public? For example a street improvement project may
provide better access to the area, which would be considered a public benefit,
where as the purchase of a public works pickup truck may not provide any public
benefit. In the case of the example, the street project would receive a priority
rating of a 5, where as, the truck purchase would receive a zero priority rating.
Public Demand: Weight Factor of 1.25. Are the residents requesting the project
be performed or the equipment purchased? For example the residents in an area
of the City may desire the purchase and installation of playground equipment in a
park. A priority factor of 5 would be high public demand verses a zero for no
public demand.
Synergy with Other Projects: Weight Factor of 1.10. Does the purchase or
project enhance or influence other City goals or projects? Projects or purchases
that affect other projects or purchases would have a rating of 5 where as, projects
or purchases that stand alone would be rated zero.
F-6
Strategic Goal: Weight Factor of 1.05. Does the project or purchase meet a
strategic goal of the City? An example would be if the City has a goal to increase
park use and the project was to build a park shelter/warming house, that project
may receive a priority factor of 5 for meeting this goal.
Comprehensive Plan Component: Weight Factor of 1.05. Does the project or
purchase help achieve a component of the City's Comprehensive Plan? An
example would be if an area of the City that was deemed places to work and the
project was for the City to replace utility lines with an oversized commercial
utility lines to the area that project would be rated a 5 as a priority factor.
Its important to note that the evaluation criteria above is to be used as a guide and a
project that scores low might still be include in a given year based on project affordability
and how it fits in with relationship to other projects.
City's Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan
The remainder of this document is the City's five-year CIP. The next three pages is a list
of all projects and equipment planned for the next five years and the revenue sources to
fund each project or equipment purchase.
The rest of the document is the description of each project or equipment purchase
proposed. These descriptions include the project name, priority ranking, project type,
useful life, and the responsible department. This is followed by the project description
and justification where the project or equipment purchase is described in detail. Next is
the project costs (expenditures) and funding source section where each department/fund
responsible for purchasing or paying for or funding the asset is provided. The next
section is for describing any future operational impact the project or purchase will have
on future budgets and/or where any other comments about the project or purchase can be
provided. Future operational impacts which are projected to increase future expenditures
are shown as positive numbers and those which will decrease future expenditures or
provide additional revenue are shown in bracketed or as negative numbers. Finally there
is the project or equipment purchase priority ranking calculation. These sheets are filled
out and provided for each project or asset purchased during the next five-year cycle.
F-7
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Expenditures: Priority
Project Name Ranking Page #
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Ledger Size Color Scanner
F - 11
4,000
Personal Computer Replacement
F - 12
13,500
16,900
11,700
15,600
15,600
Server Component Upgrades
F - 13
2,500
4,000
Security Camera Systems
F - 14
10,000
10,000
Laptop Computer Replacement
F - 15
2,500
Fire Truck Replacement
F - 16
1,000,000
Portable Radios
F - 17
12,500
Retrofit scba Packs
F - 18
14,000
Duty Officer Vehicle
F - 19
35,000
Building Inspection Vehicle
F - 20
20,000
22,000
Public Works Garage Area Remodel
F - 21
21,000
GIS Hardware & Software
F - 22
2,370
2,500
3,000
15,000
5,000
Pavement Management Software
F - 23
2,000
Hydro CAD Drainage Software
F - 24
5,000
Synchro Studio 7 Traffic Software
F - 25
8,000
Public Works Staff Car
F - 26
17,000
Ditch Mower Tractor
F - 27
80,000
Mid -Size Tractor/Loader
F - 28
60,000
Air Compressor
F - 29
20,000
Generator
F - 30
6,000
One -Ton Truck Replacement
F - 31
55,000
60,000
Pickup Truck Replacement
F - 32
25,000
30,000
Bucket Truck Replacement
F - 33
105,000
Blacktop Paver
F - 34
75,000
Blacktop Plainer
F - 35
20,000
Router
F - 36
20,000
Concrete Saw
F - 37
15,000
Backhoe
F - 38
90,000
Plow Truck Replacement
F - 39
185,000
Hook Dump Truck
F - 40
240,250
Snow Go Snow Blower
F - 41
135,000
Truck Replacement
F - 42
42,000
67,000
Mower Replacement
F - 43
42,000
120,000
Sunset Ponds Shelter Construction
F - 44
15,000
Hillcrest Park Patio/Irrigation
F - 45
15,000
Utility Mule/Small Truck
F - 46
15,000
15,000
Hunters Crossing Park Development
F - 47
60,000
Featherstone Park Development
F - 48
60,000
Pioneer Park Band Shell
F - 49
30,000
Playground Equipment Replacement
F - 50
10,000
55,000
50,000
50,000
Brush Chipper
F- 51
30,000
Bobcat Tool Cat
F - 52
48,000
Monti Hill Park Development
F - 53
65,000
Cushman Truckster
F- 54
25,000
Tractor Replacement
F - 55
85,000
Loader
F- 56
90,000
Pathway Construction
F- 57
100,000
500,000
100,000
100,000
Bertram Lakes Property Acquisition
F- 58
475,000
475,000
475,000
475,000
475,000
Purchase a Skid Loader Trailer
F- 59
8,000
F-8
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Expenditures Continued: Priority
Project Name Ranking
Page #
2010
2011
2012
2013 2014
Purchase Toro Infield Pro 5040
F - 60
19,500
Groveland Park Irrigation System
F - 61
10,000
Portable Gazebo
F - 62
6,000
Bertram Chain of Lakes Improvements
F - 63
5,000
Hillside Cemetery Grave Stone Restoration
F - 64
5,000
5,000
5,000
Storm Water Pond Restoration
F - 65
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000 20,000
MCC Office Expansion
F - 66
20,000
MCC Carpet
F - 67
10,000
10,000
10,000 10,000
Energy Management Upgrades
F - 68
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000 10,000
Electronic Reader Board
F - 69
20,000
Recreation Building Addition
F - 70
250,000
Pool Toy
F - 71
30,000
Replace Dehumidification System
F - 72
100,000
Replace Gym Floor
F - 73
40,000
Community Signs
F - 74
30,000
30,000
30,000
School Blvd. Improvements
F - 75
150,000
200,000
Intersection Improv. - School/Cedar
F - 76
500,000
Walnut Street Crosswalk/Blvd. Impr.
F - 77
10,000
Parking Lot Reconstruction
F - 78
110,000
Signal Light Battery Backups
F - 79
70,000
20,000
Street Reconstruction - Area 4A
F - 80
1,809,500
87,250
Street Reconstruction - Area 4B
F - 81
1,975,000
125,000
7th Street Construction
F - 82
1,200,000
Fallon Overpass Construction
F - 83
500,000
4,000,000
1,500,000
Street Reconstruction - Area 5
F - 84
3,420,000
180,000
Street Reconstruction - Area 6
F - 85
1,724,720
Industrial Land Purchases
F - 86
601,000
7,000,000
Street Reconstruction - Area 7B
F - 87
530,734
Monument Sign Construction
F - 88
20,000
Construct Well #6
F - 89
1,100,000
Street Light Improvements
F - 90
100,000
75,000
75,000
75,000 75,000
Trunk Highway 25 Improvements
F - 91
2,000,000
2,455,000
Ball Field Construction
F - 92
Public Works Facility
F - 93
9,000,000
PW Facility Land Acquisition
F - 94
200,000
Fire Station
F - 95
3,000,000
95th Street Extension
F - 96
1,000,000
Storm Water Lift Station Const.
F - 97
1,000,000
Storm Water Pond Lining
F - 98
200,000
Pedestrian Crossings
F - 99
Trunk Sewer Improvements
F - 100
150,000
650,000
150,000
150,000 150,000
Lift Station Pump Replacement
F - 101
265,000
Phosphorous Filter
F - 102
1,500,000
Construct SBR Tank #4
F - 103
1,400,000
Interceptor Replacement
F - 104
396,000
Sludge Tank Construction
F - 105
1,800,000
Farm Land Purchase
F - 106
1,300,000
4X4 Regular Cab Truck
F - 107
22,000
F-9
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Expenditures Continued: Priority
Project Name Ranking Page #
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
SCAD System Installation
F - 108
100,000
Water System Improvements
F - 109
150,000
150,000
150,000
150,000
150,000
Water Main Extension
F - 110
126,000
Booster Station Upgrade
F - 111
125,000
Display/Shelving
F - 112
5,000
Cash Register System
F - 113
15,000
Liquor Store Carpet Replacement
F - 114
38,000
Liquor Store Counter Replacement
F - 115
45,000
Liquor Store Cooler Replacement
F - 116
10,000
10,000
Liquor Store Security Cameras
F - 117
3,000
DMV Security Cameras
F - 118
1,500
DMV Cash Register System Purchase
F - 119
3,000
DMV Computer Purchase
F - 120
4,000
DMV Credit Card Processing System
F - 121
2,500
Water Treatment Plant
F - 122
6,000,000
Sign Lab System
F - 123
15,000
Total Expenditures:
5,136,870
11,258,150
13,260,950
21,824,320
17,273,334
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Revenue Source
Revenue Description
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
General Fund Property Taxes
60,870
506,400
491,000
130,000
165,000
General Fund Reserves
0
0
400,000
0
0
Capital Equipment Revolving Fund
165,000
299,000
493,950
590,600
1,247,600
DMV Fund
6,500
4,500
0
0
0
Street Light Improvement Fund
100,000
75,000
75,000
75,000
75,000
Shade Tree Fund Property Taxes
0
10,000
0
0
0
Shade Tree Fund Reserves
0
20,000
0
0
0
Community Center Revenues
30,000
110,000
370,000
20,000
20,000
Economic Development Fund
0
601,000
20,000
7,000,000
0
Park & Pathway Dedication Fund
200,000
0
0
0
0
Consolidated Bond Fund
300,000
495,000
475,000
0
0
Sewer Fund User Fees
200,000
150,000
155,000
400,000
400,000
Sewer Fund Reserves
0
265,000
3,501,000
786,000
558,000
Water Fund User Fees
200,000
150,000
156,000
6,150,000
150,000
Water Fund Reserves
0
0
6,000
251,000
0
Liquor Fund Reserves
0
60,000
53,000
3,000
10,000
Storm Sewer Access Fund
1,200,000
0
0
166,030
0
Water Access Fund
0
0
0
1,148,920
0
Sanitary Sewer Access Fund
0
500,000
0
51,140
0
Street Reconstruction Fund
0
0
0
705,158
265,367
2010 Improvement Bonds
2,079,500
87,250
0
0
0
2011 Improvement Bonds
500,000
7,875,000
1,625,000
0
0
2012 Improvement Bonds
0
0
5,420,000
2,635,000
0
Bond Funds -Special Assessments
0
0
0
1,217,472
857,367
Street State Aid
0
0
0
0
0
MN/DOT Participation
45,000
0
0
0
0
Unspecified Funding Source
50,000
50,000
20,000
495,000
13,525,000
Total Revenue Sources 5,136,870 11,258,150 13,260,950 21,824,320 17,273,334
F-10
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Replace Ledger Size Color Scanner
Priority Ranking: 22.10
Project Type: Equipment Replacement
Useful Life: 10 years
Responsible Dept.: Administration
worn oia color scanner with a more efficient color scanner
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 0 4,000 4,000
Source
2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 0 4,000 4,000
new scanner shows oe more energy
minimally.
energy
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011 2012
2013 2014
General Fund/Administration
(10)
Total
0
0 0
0 (10)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
2
2.50
Ability to Finance
1.00
5
5.00
Cost of Project
1.00
5
5.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
3
3.60
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
4
4.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
2
2.00
Public Benefit
1.10
0
0.00
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
22.10
F-11
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Personal Computer Replacement
Priority Ranking:
29.85
Project Type:
Equipment Replacement
Useful Life:
4 years
Responsible Dept.:
Information Technology
rI.r-1-f
on a
Replace computers to maintain updated technology software and hardware
resulting in staff efficiencies.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
3;500 16,900 11,700 15,600 15,600 73.300
Total 13,500 16,900 11,700 15,600 15;600 73,300
Funding Source
Capital Revolving Fund
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
11,700 15,600 15,600 42,900
Total 13,500 16,900 11,700 15,600 15,600 73,300
computers verses any
as a result of having up to technology.
Impact 2010 2011 2012
13,500 16,900 11,700
2014
Total 13,500 16,900 11,700 15,600 15,600
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
1
1.25
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
4
5.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
5
5.00
Cost of Project
1.00
5
5.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
3
3.60
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
5
5.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
0
0.00
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
29.85
F-12
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Multi Server Component Upgrades
Priority Ranking:
28.60
Project Type:
Equipment Replacement
Useful Life:
5 years
Responsible Dept.:
Information Technology
servers with new, more efficient multi server com
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
',500 4,000 6.500
Total 2,500 4,000 0 0 0 6,500
Fundina Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 2,500 4,000 0 0 0 6,500
servers with new ones.
Impact 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 2,500 4,000 0 0 0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
4
5.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
5
5.00
Cost of Project
1.00
5
5.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
3
3.60
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
5
5.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
0
0.00
Public Demand 1.25
Synergy with Other Projects 1.10
Strategic Goal 1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component 1.05
Total Score
F-13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Security Camera Systems
Priority Ranking:
39.55
Project Type:
Equipment Purchase
Useful Life:
10 years
Responsible Dept:
Information Technology
nase and install security camera systems City-wide and upgrade existing City facility
sra systems. Improve safety around City and help prevent crime and if crime occurs
law enforcement officials indentify individuals committing the offenses.
itures
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 10,000 10,000 0 0 20,000
Funding Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 10,000 10,000 0 0 20,000
Operating Budget Impact 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
General Fund/MIS 10 20 20 20
Total 0 10 20 20 20
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
5
7.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
5
6.25
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
2
2.50
Ability to Finance
1.00
5
5.00
Cost of Project
1.00
5
5.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
2
2.40
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
2
2.00
Public Benefit
1.10
4
4.40
Public Demand
1.25
2
2.50
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
39.55
F-14
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Replace Laptop Computer
Priority Ranking:
29.85
Project Type:
Equipment Replacement
Useful Life:
3 years
Responsible Dept.:
Information Technology
more efficient com
Expenditures 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
General Fund/MIS 2,500 2,500
Total 0 2,500 0 0 0 2,500
Funding Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
General Fund/Property Taxes 2,500 2.500
Total 0 2,500 0 0 0 2,500
impact is
Operating Budget Impact 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
No future dollar impact.
Total 0 0 0 0 0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
1
1.25
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
4
5.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
5
5.00
Cost of Project
1.00
5
5.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
3
3.60
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
5
5.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
0
0.00
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
29.85
F-15
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Replacement of Fire Truck
Priority Ranking:
38.00
Project Type:
Equipment Replacement
Useful Life:
25 years
Responsible Dept.:
Fire
ce oia Tire ladder trucK witn a new ladder truck to reduce maintenance
and meet all new safety regulations in fire truck design and equipment.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
1,000,000
Total 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000
Funding Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
General Fund/Property Taxes 0
Capital Equipment Revolving Fund 1,000,000 1,000,000
Total 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000
nacement or a oo year ola pumper trucK with a new one snould provide a safer emergency
and equipment for the fire department, which should reduce repair and maintenance costs.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 0 0 0 (1,000)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
5
7.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
1
1.25
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
3
4.50
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
1
1.00
Cost of Project
1.00
1
1.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
3
3.60
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
3
3.00
Public Benefit
1.10
4
4.40
Public Demand
1.25
4
5.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
38.00
F-16
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Purchase of 800 MHz Radios
Priority Ranking: 27.25
Project Type: Equipment Purchase
Useful Life: 25 years
Responsible Dept.: Fire
lase o auutuonai ouu mriz ramos. Keplacement of old radios with new
technology, so that all radios are the same and all fire fighters and
gency personnel can communicate with one another.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 12,500 0 0 0 0 12,500
Funding Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 12,500 0 0 0 0 12,500
Operational Impact/Other Comments:
The 800 MHz radios require an annual maintenance/subscription fee of about $250
per radio.
Operating Budget Impact 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
General Fund/Fire 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250
Total 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Factor
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
4
5.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
5
7.50
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
1
1.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
4
4.00
Public Benefit
1.10
0
0.00
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
27.25
F-17
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Replace scba packs
Priority Ranking: 26.70
Project Type: Equipment Replacement
Useful Life: 25 years
Responsible Dept.: Fire
meet current
their own mask.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 14,000 0 0 0 0 14,000
Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 14,000 0 0 0 0 14,000
budget impacts.
ipmenT ano mere Tor wui nave very
2010 2011 2012
2014
Total 0 0 0 0 0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
5
6.25
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
3
4.50
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
1
1.20
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
4
4.00
Public Benefit
1.10
0
0.00
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
26.70
F-18
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Duty Officer Vehicle
Priority Ranking:
27.35
Project Type:
Equipment Purchase
Useful Life:
7 years
Responsible Dept.:
Fire
>e of a Fire Department duty officer vehicle to reduce response time to fire
ncies and the ability to establish an incident command center at fire emergencies.
it will provide the department with a vehicle to use for nonemergency responses or
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 35,000 0 0 0 0 35.000
Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
General Fund Property Taxes 0
Total 35,000 0 0 0 0 35,000
new
($200).
Operating Budget Impact 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
General Fund/Fire 900 920 940 960 980
Total 900 920 940 960 980
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
3
4.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
3
3.75
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
0
0.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
4
4.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
4
4.80
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
0
0.00
Public Benefit
1.10
2
2.20
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
2
2.10
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
27.35
F-19
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Replace Building Inspection Vehicle
Priority Ranking:
27.05
Project Type:
Equipment Replacement
Useful Life:
8 years
Responsible Dept.:
Building Inspections
Replacement of old worn vehicles will reduce maintenance costs.
2010 2011 2012
2014 Total
Total 20,000 0 22,000 0 0 42,000
Source
Capital Revolving Fund
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
15,000
22,000
37,000
Total 20,000 0 22,000 0 0 42,000
Newer vehicles are more fuel efficient, which should reduce fuel costs also.
711
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total (2,000) (1,800) (2,800) (1,600) (1,000)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
1.10
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
1
1.25
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
4
5.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
5
5.00
Cost of Project
1.00
4
4.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
4
4.80
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
n
000
Public Demand
1.25
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
Strategic Goal
1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
Total Score
F-20
E
0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
ftaill
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Public Works Garage Area Remodel
Priority Ranking:
48.00
Project Type:
Building Improvement
Useful Life:
50 years
Responsible Dept.:
Public Works Administration
Remouei existing garageisnop space at the 1-uo0c vvorKs Facility. Improve the
operation and efficiency of the existing garage/shop area where vehicles and
equipment is maintained by the public works department and to meet safety
standards of the shop area.
itures
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 21,000 0 0 0 0 21,000
Source
Capital Revolving Fund
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
21,000
21,000
Total 21,000 0 0 0 0 21,000
mprove efficiencies and could reduce energy costs through more
heating and cooling systems.
2010 2011 2012
2013 2014
Total (1,500) (1,200) (1,200) (1,000) (1,000)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
3
4.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
5
6.25
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
4
6.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
4
4.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
5
6.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
1
1.10
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
2
2,20
Strategic Goal
1.05
4
4.20
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
48.00
F-21
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Purchase GIS Hardware & Software
Priority Ranking: 37.25
Project Type: Equipment Purchase
Useful Life: 5 years
Responsible Dept.: Engineering
continue to purchase and Implement a Gity-wide GIS system. GIS allows staff efficiencie
and better communications with the public and other government agencies. Reduces the
dependency of consultants for maps and other property related needs.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
?,370 2,500 3,000 15,000 5,000 27,870
Total 2,370 2,500 3,000 15,000 5,000 27,870
Source
axes
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
?,370 2,500 3,000 15,000 5,000 27,870
Total 2,370 2,500 3,000 15,000 5,000 27,870
a better, more
for tracking property related information.
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011 2012
2013 2014
No future dollar impact.
Total
0
0 0
0 0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
1
1.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
3
4.50
Frequent Problems
1.25
2
2.50
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
4
4.80
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
2
2.00
Public Benefit
1.10
3
3.30
Public Demand
1.25
3
3.75
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
3
3.30
Strategic Goal
1.05
1
1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
1
1.05
Total Score
37.25
F-22
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Purchase Pavement Management Software
Priority Ranking: 60.70
Project Type: Equipment Purchase
Useful Life: 5 years
Responsible Dept.: Engineering
:nase sortware wnicn wui neap manage the recoros or city street maintenance
replacement. Allows staff to maintain pavement cost effectively, saving money,
providing safe roads for residents. Synchs with City's GIS system.
itures
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 0 2,000 2,000
Funding Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 0 2,000 2,000
the City's street maintenance and replacement programs.
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011 2012
2013 2014
General Fund/Engineering
(5,000)
Total
0
0 0
0 (5,000)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
4
5.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
3
4.50
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
4
4.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
3
3.60
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
4
4.80
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
3
3.00
Public Benefit
1.10
4
4.40
Public Demand
1.25
4
5.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
3
3.30
Strategic Goal
1.05
4
4.20
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
3
3.15
Total Score
60.70
F-23
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Hydro CAD Drainage Design Software
Priority Ranking:
49.40
Project Type:
Equipment Purchase
Useful Life:
7 years
Responsible Dept.:
Engineering
Purchase software to help design and maintain storm water drainage
Reduce consultant use in the design and maintenance of storm water
drainage system.
Expenditures 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
General Fund/Engineering 5,000 5,000
Total 0 5,000 0 0 0 5,000
Fundin
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 5,000 0 0 0 5,000
use of consultants for drainage system design and review.
SudgetImpact 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 (1,000) (1,000) (1,000) (1,000)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Public Health & Safety
1.50 3
Employee Health & Safety
1.25 0
Regulatory Mandate
1.50 4
Frequent Problems
1.25 3
Ability to Finance
1.00 3
Cost of Project
1.00 4
Generates Revenue
1.20 4
Generates Cost Savings
1.20 4
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00 4
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00 0
Public Benefit
1.10 3
Public Demand
1.25 3
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10 3
Strategic Goal
1.05 3
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05 1
Total Score
F-24
Score
4.50
0.00
6.00
3.75
3.00
4.00
4.80
4.80
4.00
0.00
3.30
3.75
3.30
3.15
1.05
RKIR
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Synchro Studio 7 Traffic Software
Priority Ranking:
37.60
Project Type:
Equipment Purchase
Useful Life:
5 years
Responsible Dept.:
Engineering
rurcnase somaare to manage trate
the City in a more efficient manner.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 8,000 0 0 8,000
Funding Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 8,000 0 0 8,000
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011 2012
2013
2014
General Fund/Engineering
(200)
(200)
(200)
Total
0
0 (200)
(200)
(200)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
2
3.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
3
4.50
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
1
1.20
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
4
4.80
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
0
0.00
Public Benefit
1.10
3
3.30
Public Demand
1.25
3
3.75
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
1
1.10
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
1
1.05
Total Score
37.60
F-25
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Purchase Public Work Staff Car
Priority Ranking:
39.50
Project Type:
Equipment Purchase
Useful Life:
10 years
Responsible Dept.:
Public Works Administration
Irurcnase a nign mileage, Tour passenger car for public works staff to commute from public works
office/garage to meetings, conferences, schools, and other training.
A more economical way for public works to move around the City and to meetings compared to
a pick up truck
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 17.000 0 0 0 17.000
Funding Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
17.000 17.000
Total 0 17,000 0 0 0 17,000
na require same maintenance as current trucks, but could provide significant
costs savings.
rating Budget Impact 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 (150) (150) (150) (150)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
3
4.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
3
3.75
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
1
1.50
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
1
1.20
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
5
6.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
4
4.00
Public Benefit
1.10
1
1.10
Public Demand 1.25
Synergy with Other Projects 1.10
Strategic Goal 1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component 1.05
Total Score
F-26
0.00
0.00
2.10
0.00
35.90
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Replace the Ditch Mower Tractor
Priority Ranking: 40.65
Project Type: Equipment Replacement
Useful Life: 15 years
Responsible Dept.: Streets & Alleys
Reduce maintenance and repair costs and improve equipment safety by replacing old
Expenditures 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
General Fund/Streets 80,000 80,000
Total 0 80,000 0 0 0 80,000
Capital Revolving Fund
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
: f0r
Total 0 80,000 0 0 0 80,000
e repair and maintenance costs by replacing old equipments and provide better
to employees using the equipment with improved safety equipment on the equipment.
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
General Fund/Streets
(200)
(200)
(200)
(200)
Total
0
(200)
(200)
(200)
(200)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
5
6.25
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
5
6.25
Ability to Finance
1.00
5
5.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
1
1.20
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
2
2.20
Public Demand
1.25
3
3.75
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
40.65
F-27
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Replacement of Mid -Size Tractor/Loader
Priority Ranking: 25.90
Project Type: Equipment Replacement
Useful Life: 20 years
Responsible Dept.: Streets & Alleys
,e the City's mid-size tractor loader. Replacing an old mid-size to
has exceeded its useful life will reduce repair maintenance costs.
itures
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
60,000 60.000
Total 0 60,000 0 0 0 60.000
Source
saxes
Capital Revolving Fund
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
60,000
Total 0 60,000 0 0 0 60,000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 (300) (300) (300) 0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
1.00
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
2
3.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
3
3.75
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
Public Benefit
1.10
Public Demand
1.25
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
Strategic Goal
1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
Total Score
F-28
2 2.40
3 3.00
4 4.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
25.90
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Air Compressor Replacement
Priority Ranking: 22.85
Project Type: Equipment Replacement
Useful Life: 10 years
Responsible Dept.: Streets & Alleys
the streets and alley activities large air compressor.
staff with good equipment to complete needed tasks without a lot of breakdowns.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 20,000 0 0 0 0 20,000
Fund Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
General Fund/Property Taxes 20,000 20,000
Total 20,000 0 0 0 0 20,000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total (25) (25) (25) (25) (25)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
3
3.60
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
0
0.00
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
22.85
F-29
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Generator Replacement
Priority Ranking: 27.80
Project Type: Equipment Replacement
Useful Life: 10 years
Responsible Dept.: Streets & Alleys
Replace the streets and alley activities large generator.
Provide staff with good equipment to complete needed tasks without a lot of breakdowns.
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014 Total
000 6,000
Total 0 0 0 0 6,000 6,000
Fund Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Capital Revolving Fund 6,000 6,000
Total 0 0 0 0 6,000 6,000
Im
to equipment breakdown.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 0 0 0 (25)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
2
3.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
1
1.25
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
4
4.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
3
3.60
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
2
2.20
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
27.80
F-30
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: One -Ton Truck Replacement
Priority Ranking: 30.50
Project Type: Equipment Replacement
Useful Life: 7 years
Responsible Dept.: Streets & Alleys
costs on City vehicles and reduce staff down time due to equipment repairs.
2010
2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 55.000 0 0 60,000 115,000
Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 55,000 0 0 60,000 115,000
meuuce repair maintenance cost on uty venicies ana reauce start Gown time aue to
equipment repairs. The replacement of trucks in 2011 includes a one -ton truck and a
pick-up truck. For 2012 another one -ton truck will be replaced.
ng Budget Impact 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 (2,200) (2,000) (1,500) (1,800)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
2
3.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
4
5.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
4
5.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
2
2.40
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
1
1.10
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
30.50
F-31
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Pickup Truck Replacement
Priority Ranking: 25.35
Project Type: Equipment Replacement
Useful Life: 7 years
Responsible Dept.: Streets & Alleys
)air maintenance costs on City vehicles and reduce staff down time due
equipment repairs.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
25,000 30,000 55,000
Total 0 25,000 0 30,000 0 55,000
Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
30,000
Total 0 25,000 0 30,000 0 55,000
reduce repair maintenance cost on City vehicles and reduce staff down time due to
equipment repairs. The replacement of trucks in 2011 includes a 4X4 truck. For 2013
another 4X4 truck is scheduled to be replaced.
Impact 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 (800) (800) (1,000) (1,000)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
1
1.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
3
3.60
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
0
0.00
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects 1.10
Strategic Goal 1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component 1.05
Total Score
F-32
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.35
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Replace Bucket Truck
Priority Ranking:
34.70
Project Type:
Equipment Replacement
Useful Life:
10 years
Responsible Dept.:
Streets & Alleys
ce me street aepartmeni s DUCKet trucK. Keauce repair maintenance costs, r
time of staff due to equipment being repaired and improve equipment safety.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 105,000 0 0 105,000
Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 105,000 0 0 105,000
being repaired.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 0 (3,000) (3,000) (3,000)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
1.10
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
3
4.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
5
6.25
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
1
1.50
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
3
3.60
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
1
1.10
Public Demand
1.25
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
Strategic Goal
1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
Total Score
F-33
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
34.70
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Replace Blacktop Paver
Priority Ranking: 30.20
Project Type: Equipment Replacement
Useful Life: 15 years
Responsible Dept.: Streets & Alleys
due to equipment being repaired and improve equipment safety.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 75,000 0 0 0 75,000
Source
Capital Revolving Fund
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
37,500
37,500
Total 0 75,000 0 0 0 75,000
repaired.
uce staff down time due to equipment
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 (500) (500) (500) (500)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
1
1.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
4
5.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
4
5.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
3
3.60
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
1
1 10
Public Demand 1.25
Synergy with Other Projects 1.10
Strategic Goal 1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component 1.05
Total Score
F-34
0
0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
30.20
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Replace Blacktop Plainer
Priority Ranking:
31.85
Project Type:
Equipment Replacement
Useful Life:
15 years
Responsible Dept.:
Streets & Alleys
repair maintenance costs, reduce down time of staff due to equipment being
and improve equipment safety.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 0 20,000 20,000
Funding Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 0 20,000 20,000
repaired.
costs and reduce staff down time due to equipment
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 0 0 0 (200)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Factor
Priority
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
2
3.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
4
5.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
5
6.25
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
3
3.60
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
0
0.00
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
31.85
F-35
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Replace Router
Priority Ranking: 34.05
Project Type: Equipment Replacement
Useful Life: 15 years
Responsible Dept.: Streets & Alleys
the streets department's router. Reduce repair maintenance costs,
down time due to equipment being repaired and improve equipment safety.
itures
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
20,000 20,000
Total 0 0 20:000 0 0 20,000
Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
W11
Total 0 0 20,000 0 0 20,000
repaired.
uce staff down time due to equipment
2010 2011 2012 2013
Total 0 0 (200) (200) (200)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
1.00
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
2
3.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
5
6.25
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
4
5.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
Public Benefit
1.10
Public Demand
1.25
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
Strategic Goal
1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
Total Score
F-36
3 3.60
3 3.00
5 5.00
2 2.20
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
34.05
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Replace Concrete saw
Priority Ranking: 31.70
Project Type: Equipment Replacement
Useful Life: 15 years
Responsible Dept.: Streets & Alleys
street
saw.
down time of staff due to equipment being repaired and improve
ent safety.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 15,000 0 0 15,000
Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
evolving Fund 15,000 15,000
Total 0 0 15,000 0 0 15,000
costs
repaired.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 0 (200) (200) (200)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
2
3.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
5
6.25
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
3
3.60
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
1
1.10
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
31.70
F-37
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Replace Backhoe
Priority Ranking:
28.35
Project Type:
Equipment Replacement
Useful Life:
20 years
Responsible Dept.:
Streets & Alleys
to equipment being repaired and improve equipment safety. It may also be more fuel efficient.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 0 90,000 90,000
Fundinq Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 0 0 0 90,000 90,000
being repaired. It may also reduce fuel costs.
Li
2010
n time due to equipment
2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 0 0 0 (1,000)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
1.10
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
2
3.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
4
5.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
3
3.60
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
4
4.00
Public Benefit
1.10
n
Public Demand
1.25
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
Strategic Goal
1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
Total Score
F-38
A
"I
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
28.35
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
'roject Name: Replace Plow Trucks
3riority Ranking: 35.65
Droject Type: Equipment Replacement
Jseful Life: 20 years
Responsible Dept.: Streets & Alleys and Ice & Snow
being repaired and improve equipment safety. It may also be more fuel efficient.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
General Fund/Snow & Ice 92,500 92,500
Total 0 0 0 185,000 0 185,000
Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 185,000 0 185,000
being repaired. It may also reduce fuel costs.
Operating Budget Impact 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
General Fund/Streets (1,500) (1,500)
General Fund/Snow & Ice (1,500) (1,500)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Factor
Priority
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
4
5.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
3
3.60
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
3
3.30
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
35.65
F-39
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Hook Dump truck Replacement
Priority Ranking: 35.20
Project Type: Equipment Replacement
Useful Life: 15 years
Responsible Dept.: Streets & Alleys and Ice & Snow
worn equipment should reduce repair maintenance costs and staff down
due to equipment being out of service.
General Fund/Snow & Ice
2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
120,125
120,125
Total 0 0 240,250 0 0 240,250
Source
Capital Revolving Fund
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
240,250
240,250
Total 0 0 240,250 0 0 240,250
ace old worn out equipment should reduce repair
down time due to equipment being out of service.
2010 2011
General Fund/Snow & Ice
2013 2014
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
2
3.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
4
5.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
4
5.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
5
6.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
2
2.20
Public Demand 1.25
Synergy with Other Projects 1.10
Strategic Goal 1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component 1.05
Total Score
F-40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
35.20
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Replace Snow Go Snow Blower
Priority Ranking:
38.35
Project Type:
Equipment Replacement
Useful Life:
10 years
Responsible Dept.:
Ice & Snow
replacement of Uty's Snow Go snow blower. Reduce repair maintenance costs, r
down time of staff due to equipment being repaired and improve equipment safety.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
135,000 135,000
Total 0 0 0 135,000 0 135,000
Fundina Source
2010 2011 2012
2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 135,000 0 135,000
m
costs
repaired.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 0 0 (1,200) (1,200)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
5
6.25
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
4
5.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
4
4.80
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
4
4.00
Public Benefit
1.10
3
3.30
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects 1.10
Strategic Goal 1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component 1.05
Total Score
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
F-41 38.35
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Truck Replacement
Priority Ranking:
25.65
Project Type:
Equipment Replacement
Useful Life:
7 years
Responsible Dept.:
Parks
Reduce repair maintenance cost on City trucks and reduce staff down time due to
equipment repairs.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
42;000 67,000 109.000
Total 42,000 67,000 0 0 0 109,000
Source
Capital Revolving Fund
2010 2011
42.000
2012 2013 2014 Total
42,000
Total 42,000 67,000 0 0 0 109,000
uperanonai impact/utner t.omments:
Reduce repair maintenance costs and staff down time due to equipment repairs.
The trucks budget for replacement in 2009 and 2010 are one -ton trucks and the
truck budgeted for replacement in 2011 is a three quarter -ton truck.
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
General Fund/Parks
(250)
(600)
(500)
(200)
0
Total
(250)
(600)
(500)
(200)
0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
1
1.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
1
1.25
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
4
5.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
4
4.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
4
4.80
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
4
4.00
Public Benefit
1.10
1
1.10
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
25.65
F-42
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Replacement of Mowers
Priority Ranking:
31.85
Project Type:
Equipment Replacement
Useful Life:
10 years
Responsible Dept.:
Parks
rteplace city mowers in the parks department.
For 2010, two 72" 4X4 mowers are scheduled to be replaced and one in 2011.
The 2012 mower is a 455 mower.
Reduce repair maintenance costs and staff down time due to equipment repairs.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 42,000 120,000 0 0 162.000
Source
Capital Revolving Fund
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 42,000 120,000 0 0 82,000
lmeauce repair maintenance costs and statt down time due to equipment repairs. I
The mowers scheduled for replacement in 2010 and 2011 are 72" 4X4 mowers
and the one in 2012 is a 455 mower.
Im
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 (7,000) (10,000) (8,000) (5,000)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
2
3.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
4
5.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
4
4.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
4
4.80
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
4
4.00
Public Benefit
1.10
3
3.30
Public Demand
1.25
1
1.25
Synergy with Other Projects 1.10 0 0.00
Strategic Goal 1.05 0 0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component 1.05 0 0.00
Total Score F-43 31.85
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Sunset Ponds Shelter Construction
Priority Ranking: 23.80
Project Type: Park Improvement
Useful Life: 20 years
Responsible Dept.: Parks
Improve the neighborhood park to increase usage.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 15,000 0 0 0 15,000
Funding Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
General Fund/Property Taxes 15,000 15,000
Total 0 15,000 0 0 0 15,000
costs
the facility.
Operating Budget Impact 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
General Fund/Parks 50 75 100 100
Total 0 50 75 100 100
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
1
1.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
0
0.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
4
4.00
Cost of Project
1.00
4
4.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
1
1.20
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
0
0.00
Public Benefit
1.10
4
4.40
Public Demand
1.25
2
2.50
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
2
2.10
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
2
2.10
Total Score
23.80
F-44
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Hillcrest Park Patio/Irrigation Improvements
Priority Ranking:
16.80
Project Type:
Park Improvements
Useful Life:
25 years
Responsible Dept.:
Parks
is a pauo area ana instaii a lawn irrigatior
improve uses and looks of Hillcrest Park.
itures
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 15,000 0 15,000
Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 15,000 0 15,000
rrigation system should require the grass to need mowing on a regul
the patio and irrigation system will require maintenance in the future.
Operating Budget Impact 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
General Fund/Parks 250 300
Total 0 0 0 250 300
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
0
0.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
4
4.00
Cost of Project
1.00
4
4.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
1
1.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
0
0.00
Public Benefit
1.10
1
1.10
Public Demand
1.25
2
2.50
Synergy with Other Projects 1.10
Strategic Goal 1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component 1.05
Total Score
F-45
0.00
2.10
2.10
16.80
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Utility Mule/Small Truck Replacement/Purchase
Priority Ranking:
24.80
Project Type:
Equipment Replacement/Purchase
Useful Life:
7 years
Responsible Dept.:
Parks
Replace the City's current utility ATV (utility mule) and purchase a second utility ATV.
Reduce repair maintenance cost and reduce staff down time due to equipment repairs
and provide a second utility mule to increase efficiencies.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
5,000 15,000 30.000
Total 15,000 15,000 0 0 0 30,000
Fundinq Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 15,000 15,000 0 0 0 30,000
provide a second utility mule to increase efficiencies.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total (150) (50) (50) 0 0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
2
2.50
Ability to Finance
1.00
5
5.00
Cost of Project
1.00
4
4.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
3
3.60
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
2
2.00
Public Benefit
1.10
1
1.10
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
1
1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
1
1.05
Total Score
24.80
F-46
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Hunters Crossing Park Development
Priority Ranking:
21.80
Project Type:
Park Improvement
Useful Life:
20 years
Responsible Dept.:
Parks
Establish usable park areas for families.
areas
2010 2011 2012
2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 0 60,000 60,000
Source
2010 2011
2012 2013
2014 Total
),000 60,000
Total 0 0 0 0 60,000 60,000
and play areas including mowing play areas.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 0 0 0 5,000
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
0
0.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
1
1.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
0
0.00
Public Benefit
1.10
5
5.50
Public Demand
1.25
4
5.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
3
3.15
Total Score
21.80
F-47
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Featherstone Park Development
Priority Ranking: 21.80
Project Type: Park Improvement
Useful Life: 20 years
Responsible Dept.: Parks
lent of a neighborhood park including play areas
usable park areas for families.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 60,000 0 0 60,000
Funding Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 60,000 0 0 60,000
impacts oT aeveioping a park would be the to
and play areas including mowing play areas.
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011 2012
2013 2014
General Fund/Parks
1,000
1,000 1,000
Total
0
0 1,000
1,000 1,000
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
0
0.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
1
1.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
0
0.00
Public Benefit
1.10
5
5.50
Public Demand
1.25
4
5.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
3
3.15
Total Score
21.80
F-48
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Construct a Band Shell at Pioneer Park
Priority Ranking:
28.15
Project Type:
Park Improvement
Useful Life:
50 years
Responsible Dept.:
Parks
ruct a Dand shell In Pioneer Park in order to provide a community ga'
where music and other entertainment could be preformed during the
ier months.
2010
2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
),000 30,000
Total 0 30,000 0 0 0 30,000
Funding Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
General Fund/Property Taxes 30,000 30.000
Total 0 30,000 0 0 0 30,000
preserve
for a long useful life.
Operating Budget Impact 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
General Fund/Parks 200 300 300 500
Total 0 200 300 300 500
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
0
0.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
2
2.40
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
0
0.00
Public Benefit
1.10
5
5.50
Public Demand
1.25
3
3.75
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
2
2.20
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
3
3.15
Total Score
28.15
F-49
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Playground Equipment Replacement
Priority Ranking:
37.00
Project Type:
Equipment Replacement
Useful Life:
25 years
Responsible Dept.:
Parks
I worn playground equipment. Pi
by replacing old worn equipment.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 10;000 55,000 50,000 50,000 165,000
Source
Capital Revolving Fund
2010 2011 2012
I u,uuu
2013 2014 Total
65,000
50,000 50,000 100,000
Total 0 10,000 55,000 50,000 50,000 165,000
ng old recreation equipment may reduc
safe equipment for children to play on.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 (50) (100) (100) (100)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
2
3.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
2
2.50
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
1
1.20
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
4
4.00
Public Benefit
1.10
5
5.50
Public Demand
1.25
2
2.50
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
3
3.15
Total Score
37.00
F-50
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Replace Brush Chipper
Priority Ranking:
36.60
Project Type:
Equipment Replacement
Useful Life:
15 years
Responsible Dept.:
Parks
staff due to equipment being repaired and improve equipment safety.
itures
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 30,000 0 0 0 30,000
Funding Source
Shade Tree Fund Reserves
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
20,000
Total 0 30,000 0 0 0 30,000
repaired.
uce staff down time due to equipment
2010 2011 2012 2013
Total 0 (500) (200) (150) (150)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
1
1.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
4
5.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
2
3.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
4
5.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
4
4.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
2
2.40
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
2
2.40
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
2
2.20
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
2
2.10
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
36.60
F-51
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Purchase Bobcat Tool Cat
Priority Ranking: 21.80
Project Type: Equipment Purchase
Useful Life: 15 years
Responsible Dept.: Parks
Improve park maintenance efficiencies and safety.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
48,000 48,000
Total 0 48,000 0 0 0 48,000
Funding Source
General Fund/Pr(
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 48,000 0 0 0 48,000
costs will increase as will fuel usage.
Impact 2010 2011 2012
75 100
2014
Total 0 75 100 100 150
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
2
2.50
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
3
3.60
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
3
3.00
Public Benefit
1.10
1
1.10
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects 1.10
Strategic Goal 1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component 1.05
Total Score
F-52
0.00
1.05
1.05
21.80
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Monti Hill Park Development
Priority Ranking: 26.40
Project Type: Park Improvement
Useful Life: 20 years
Responsible Dept.: Parks
City grows develop a park in the new area for i
including play areas and playground equipment.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 65,000 0 0 0 65,000
Funding Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 65,000 0 0 0 65,000
impacts of developing a parK wou
and staff time to mow play areas.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 500 1,000 1,000 1,000
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
0
0.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
2
2.40
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
1
1.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
0
0.00
Public Benefit
1.10
5
5.50
Public Demand
1.25
4
5.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
2
2.20
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
3
3.15
Total Score
26.40
F-53
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Replace Cushman Truckster
Priority Ranking:
23.05
Project Type:
Equipment Replacement
Useful Life:
15 years
Responsible Dept.:
Parks
repair maintenance costs, reduce down time of staff due to equipment being
and improve equipment safety. It may also be more fuel efficient.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 25,000 0 0 0 25,000
Funding Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
General Fund/Property Taxes 25,000 25,000
Total 0 25,000 0 0 0 25,000
repaired. It may also reduce fuel costs.
2010
n time due to equir
2011 2012
2014
Total 0 (50) (200) (175) (100)
Priority Ranking
Criteria
Weighting
Factor
Priority
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
000
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
Public Benefit
1.10
Public Demand
1.25
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
Strategic Goal
1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
Total Score
F-54
3 3.60
2 2.00
3 3.00
1 1.10
0 0.00
0 0.00
1 1.05
1 1.05
23.05
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Replace Tractor
Priority Ranking:
19.85
Project Type:
Equipment Replacement
Useful Life:
20 years
Responsible Dept.:
Parks
Keptace tractor used by parks department to help maintain City parks.
Reduce repair maintenance costs, reduce down time of staff due to equipment being
repaired and improve equipment safety. It may also be more fuel efficient.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 85,000 0 85.000
Funding Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Capital Revolving Fund 85,000 85,000
Total 0 0 0 85,000 0 85,000
repaired. It may also reduce fuel costs.
2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 0 0 (1,000) (600)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
1
1.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
2
2.40
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
3
3.00
Public Benefit
1.10
1
1.10
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
1
1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
1
1.05
Total Score
19.85
F-55
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Replace Loader
Priority Ranking: 18.75
Project Type: Equipment Replacement
Useful Life: 20 years
Responsible Dept.: Parks
repair maintenance costs, reduce down time of staff due to equipment being
and improve equipment safety. It may also be more fuel efficient.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 90,000 0 90,000
Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 90,000 0 90,000
:e repair maintenance costs and reduce staff down time
repaired. It may also reduce fuel costs.
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011 2012
2013
2014
General Fund/Parks
(1,000)
(1,000)
Total
0
0 0
(1,000)
(1,000)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
1
1.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
2
2.40
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
3
3.00
Public Benefit
1.10
0
0.00
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
1
1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
1
1.05
Total Score
18.75
F-56
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Pathway Construction
Priority Ranking:
35.60
Project Type:
Park Improvement
Useful Life:
30 years
Responsible Dept.:
Parks
people to exercise and use to get safely from one area of the City to other
as in the City.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
100,000 500,000 100,000 100,000 800.000
Total 0 100,000 500,000 100,000 100,000 800,000
Funding Source
General Fund/Reserves
2010 2011 2012 2013
F��
2014 Total
1,000 400,000
400,000
Total 0 100,000 500,000 100,000 100,000 800,000
and repairs. As the City expands its pathway system, the budget for maintenance may need to be
increased. The current budget impact will be for time spent mowing along the additional miles of G
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011
2012
2013 2014
General Fund/Parks
200
300
500 700
Total
0
200
300
500 700
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
2
3.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
2
2.50
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
2
2.00
Public Benefit
1.10
5
5.50
Public Demand
1.25
4
5.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
3
3.30
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
3
3.15
Total Score
35.60
F-57
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Bertram Lakes Property Acquisition
Priority Ranking: 29.95
Project Type: Park Improvement
Useful Life: 100 years
Responsible Dept.: Parks
Mata
1'J
h Wright County and possible the State of Minnesota. Development of a large regional park
help provide needed park space and attract new development within the area and preserve the
Lural area around the lakes.
Expenditures 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Capital Project Fund 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 2,375,000
Total 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 2,375,000
Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Consolidated Bond Fund 275,000 475,000 475,000 1,225,000
Unspecified Funding Source 475,000 475,000 950,000
Total 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 2,375,000
A tuture tunding source would need to be Lound because this purchase w(
exhaust City reserves. The land purchase it self has no operating impact.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 0 0 0 0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
0
0.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
1
1.00
Cost of Project
1.00
1
1.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
2
2.40
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
1
1.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
0
0.00
Public Benefit
1.10
5
5.50
Public Demand
1.25
5
6.25
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
4
4.40
Strategic Goal
1.05
4
4.20
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
4
4.20
Total Score
29.95
F-58
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Purchase a Skid Loader Trailer
Priority Ranking:
12.40
Project Type:
Equipment Purchase
Useful Life:
10 years
Responsible Dept.:
Parks
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 8,000 0 0 0 0 8,000
Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 8,000 0 0 0 0 8,000
purchase of the trailer will provide for safer, more efficient to
equipment and may reduce trailer maintenance cost slightly.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total (10) (10) 0 0 0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
0
0.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
5
5.00
Cost of Project
1.00
4
4.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
2
2.40
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
1
1.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
0
0.00
Public Benefit
1.10
0
0.00
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
12.40
F-59
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Purchase a Toro Infield Pro 5040
Priority Ranking:
15.10
Project Type:
Equipment Purchase
Useful Life:
10 years
Responsible Dept.:
Parks
a macrhme to maintain the ci
safe, well groomed ball fields.
2010
2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
x,500 19,500
Total 0 19,500 0 0 0 19.500
Funding Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
General Fund/Property Taxes 10,000 10,000
Capital Revolving Fund 9,500 9,500
Total 0 19,500 0 0 0 19,500
JlpmenT win Increase TUel ano maintenance costs, some oT whic
from being able to maintain the fields in a more efficient manor.
Operating Budget Impact 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
General Fund/Parks 50 100 100 100
Total 0 50 100 100 100
Priority Ranking
Weighting Priority
Factor Factor
Public Health & Safety
1.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
Frequent Problems
1.25
Ability to Finance
1.00
Cost of Project
1.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
Public Benefit
1.10
Public Demand
1.25
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
Strategic Goal
1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
Total Score
F-60
1 1.25
0 0.00
1 1.25
2 2.00
3 3.00
0 0.00
2 2.40
2 2.00
0 0.00
1 1.10
0 0.00
0 0.00
1 1.05
1 1.05
15.10
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Groveland Park Irrigation System
Priority Ranking:
16.55
Project Type:
Park Improvement
Useful Life:
10 years
Responsible Dept.:
Parks
Install an irrigation system in Groveland park. I
making the park more attractive for park users.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
10,000
Total 0 0 10.000 0 0 10,000
Funding Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
General Fund/Property Taxes 10,000 10,000
Total 0 0 10,000 0 0 10,000
Operating Budget Impact 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
General Fund/Parks 200 300 500
Total 0 0 200 300 500
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
0
0.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
4
4.00
Cost of Project
1.00
4
4.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
0
0.00
Public Benefit
1.10
1
1.10
Public Demand
1.25
1
1.25
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
2
2.10
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
2
2.10
Total Score
16.55
F-61
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Gazebo for Commercial Property Lot
Priority Ranking:
30.10
Project Type:
Improvement
Useful Life:
15 years
Responsible Dept.:
Parks
nstruct a portable gazebo to provide a pleasant area in the downtown area
people to sit and relax. Attract shoppers to the downtown area by providing
attractive resting area.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
6.000 6,000
Total 0 6,000 0 0 0 6,000
Funding Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 6,000 0 0 0 6,000
I he gazebo will be portable and may take City staff time to move it from one
location to another. The gazebo will also need routine maintenance including
Operating Budget Impact 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
General Fund/Parks 30 100 150 500
Total 0 30 100 150 500
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
1
1.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
0
0.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
4
4.00
Cost of Project
1.00
4
4.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
0
0.00
Public Benefit
1.10
4
4.40
Public Demand
1.25
2
2.50
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
4
4.40
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
3
3.15
Total Score
30.10
F-62
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Bertram Chain of Lakes Improvements
Priority Ranking: 36.50
Project Type: Improvements
Useful Life: 25 year
Responsible Dept.: Parks
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 5,000 0 0 0 5,000
Funding Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 5,000 0 0 0 5,000
operating
on
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011 2012
2013 2014
Based on type & timing of improvements.
Total
0
0 0
0 0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
0
0.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
5
5.00
Cost of Project
1.00
5
5.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
1
1.20
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
0
0.00
Public Benefit
1.10
5
5.50
Public Demand
1.25
4
5.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
5
5.50
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
3
3.15
Total Score
36.50
F-63
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Hillside Cemetery Grave Stone Restoration
Priority Ranking:
22.50
Project Type:
Improvements
Useful Life:
25 years
Responsible Dept.:
Parks
grave site head stones
cemetery sites.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
5,000 5,000 5,000 15.000
Total 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 0 15,000
Fundinq Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 0 15,000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 0 0 0 0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
4
4.00
Cost of Project
1.00
4
4.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
0
0.00
Public Demand
1.25
3
3.75
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
22.50
F-64
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Storm Water Pond Restoration/Maintenance
Priority Ranking: 49.65
Project Type: Storm Water Improvement
Useful Life: 50 years
Responsible Dept.: Engineering/Public Works Administration
Restore storm water pond areas by cleaning out soils and poor vegetation.
Provide an adequate storm water drainage system by maintaining capacity
and reducing sediment transported between ponds and the river. Comply
with storm water pollution prevention program (SWPPP) requirements.
itures
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000
Funding Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20.000 100,000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
1
1.25
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
5
7.50
Frequent Problems
1.25
5
6.25
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
4
4.00
Public Benefit
1.10
4
4.40
Public Demand
1.25
3
3.75
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
3
3.30
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
1
1.05
Total Score
49.65
F-65
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Office Expansion
Priority Ranking:
30.15
Project Type:
Building Improvement
Useful Life:
30 years
Responsible Dept.:
Community Center
.pans ana improve community Center office space.
e current office space for the Community Center is too small and requires some staff
share offices and provides no privacy for staff or for meetings.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 20,000 0 0 0 0 20,000
Funding Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 20,000 0 0 0 0 20,000
new area wiii require the purcnase oT some
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011
2012
2013 2014
Community Center
5,000
500
0
0 0
Total
5,000
500
0
0 0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
3
3.75
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
4
5.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
4
4.00
Cost of Project
1.00
4
4.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
0
0.00
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
3
3.30
Strategic Goal
1.05
2
2.10
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
30.15
F-66
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Community Center Carpet
Priority Ranking: 36.00
Project Type: Building Improvements
Useful Life: 10 years
Responsible Dept.: Community Center
Add or replace carpet in the various meeting rooms or in carpeted areas of
Community Center. To make the meeting rooms of the Community Center
more attractive for room rentals and replace old worn carpet.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 40,000
Fundinq Source
2010
2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
),000 10,000 10,000 10,000 40,000
Total 0 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 40,000
ruture operating impact will be minimal since Community Center staff already maintain
carpet in some areas of the facility and areas without carpet require mopping and other
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 0 0 0 0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
1
1.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
5
5.00
Cost of Project
1.00
5
5.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
2
2.40
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
2
2.20
Public Demand
1.25
4
5.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
36.00
F-67
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Energy Management Upgrades
Priority Ranking:
31.05
Project Type:
Building Improvements
Useful Life:
25 years
Responsible Dept.:
Community Center
iew ana upaatenmprove energy using, mcluaing lighting, heating and gas usage
in the Community Center. Reduce energy costs of operating the Community Center.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000
Funding Source
H
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000
energy costs
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total (200) (500) (1,000) (3,000) (6,000)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Factor
Priority
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
4
4.00
Cost of Project
1.00
4
4.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
5
6.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
5
5.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
4
4.00
Public Benefit
1.10
2
2.20
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
1
1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
1
1.05
Total Score
31.05
F-68
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Install Electronic Reader Board
Priority Ranking: 28.70
Project Type: Improvement
Useful Life: 20 years
Responsible Dept.: Community Center
an
on
fi7
events, activities, and important meetings. Increase participation in City events and activities,
which would increase revenues, plus increase citizen involvement in important City meetings.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 20,000 0 0 0 20,000
Funding Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Community Center Revenues 20,000 20,000
Total 0 20,000 0 0 0 20,000
input or change the messages on the board.
•d and some minor start time
2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 150 150 150 150 150
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
2
2.50
Ability to Finance
1.00
4
4.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
1
1.20
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
3
3.60
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
1
1.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
0
0.00
Public Benefit
1.10
4
4.40
Public Demand
1.25
2
2.50
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
4
4.40
Strategic Goal
1.05
2
2.10
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
28.70
F-69
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Recreation Area Building Addition
Priority Ranking:
33.35
Project Type:
Building Improvement
Useful Life:
50 years
Responsible Dept.:
Community Center
Construct an addition onto the Community Center for increased recreational activiti
Increase recreational opportunities and increase memberships and other revenues
of the Community Center.
itures
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 250.000 0 0 250.000
Funding Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Community Center Revenues 250,000 250.000
Total 0 0 250,000 0 0 250,000
rease otuiding areas to be r
area to heat, cool and light.
nity
energy costs
2010 2011 2012
2013 2014
Total 0 0 10,000 15,000 15,000
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
2
3.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
1
1.25
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
0
0.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
1
1.00
Cost of Project
1.00
1
1.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
5
6.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
1
1.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
0
0.00
Public Benefit
1.10
5
5.50
Public Demand
1.25
4
5.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
3
3.30
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
3
3.15
Total Score
33.35
F-70
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Pool Toy Purchase
Priority Ranking:
36.30
Project Type:
Equipment Purchase
Useful Life:
10 years
Responsible Dept.:
Community Center
ming pool. Increase pool usage and memberships of the Community Center.
Expenditures 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Community Center 30,000 30,000
Total 0 30,000 0 0 0 30,000
Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 30,000 0 0 0 30,000
Operating Budget Impact 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Community Center 200 200 200 200
Total 0 200 200 200 200
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
2
2.50
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
4
4.80
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
4
4.00
Public Benefit
1.10
5
5.50
Public Demand
1.25
4
5.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
2
2.20
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
3
3.15
Total Score
36.30
F-71
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Replace Dehumidification System
Priority Ranking: 31.45
Project Type: Equipment Replacement
Useful Life: 25 years
Responsible Dept.: Community Center
the Community Center's dehumidification system.
repair maintenance costs and energy costs by replacing the
with a more efficient system.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
100,000 100,000
Total 0 0 100,000 0 0 100,000
Fundinq Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 100,000 0 0 100,000
Budget Im
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 0 (250) (250) (250)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
3
4.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
1
1.00
Cost of Project
1.00
1
1.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
4
4.80
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
3
3.30
Public Demand
1.25
2
2.50
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
1
1.10
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
31.45
F-72
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Replace Gym Floor
Priority Ranking:
30.45
Project Type:
Building Improvement
Useful Life:
25 years
Responsible Dept.:
Community Center
ace community center gym poor. Keauce maintenance of old worn gym
and maintain the gyms usability for activities.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 40.000 0 0 0 40.000
Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 40,000 0 0 0 40,000
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011 2012
2013
2014
Community Center
0
(150) (100)
(50)
0
Total
0
(150) (100)
(50)
0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
1
1.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
1
1.25
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
2
2.50
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
1
1.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
3
3.60
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
2
2.40
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
1
1.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
4
4.00
Public Benefit
1.10
5
5.50
Public Demand
1.25
2
2.50
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
1
1.10
Strategic Goal
1.05
1
1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
1
1.05
Total Score
30.45
F-73
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Community Signs
Priority Ranking:
27.85
Project Type:
Infrastructure Improvements
Useful Life:
25 years
Responsible Dept.:
Economic Development
services and businesses are available. Promote and attract
le and businesses to the City of Monticello.
res
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 30,000 307000 0 0 30,000 90,000
Funding Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Unspecified Funding Source 30,000 30,000 30,000 90,000
Total 30,000 30,000 0 0 30,000 90,000
areas
will require very low maintenance.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 150 250 250 250 250
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
1
1.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
1
1.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
0
0.00
Public Benefit
1.10
5
5.50
Public Demand
1.25
4
5.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
4
4.40
Strategic Goal
1.05
2
2.10
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
2
2.10
Total Score
27,85
F-74
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: School Boulevard Improvements
Priority Ranking: 39.8
Project Type: Street Improvements
Useful Life: 30 years
Responsible Dept.: Engineering/Streets & Alleys
prove venicle ano pedestrian traffic flows and safety on School Boulevard througl
proved lighting and pathways along the roadway. Provide for safer and improved
hicle and pedestrian flows along School Boulevard.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 150,000 200,000 0 0 0 350,000
Funding Source
2011 Improvement Bonds
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
200,000
200,000
Total 150,000 200,000 0 0 0 350,000
ease in electrical cost for lighting improvements ani
add cost for snow plowing and future maintenance.
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011
2012 2013
2014
General Fund
100
500
1,000 1,000
1,000
Total
100
500
1,000 1,000
1,000
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
5
7.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
1
1.25
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
3
4.50
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
1
1.00
Cost of Project
1.00
1
1.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
2
2.00
Public Benefit
1.10
4
4.40
Public Demand
1.25
4
5.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
1
1.10
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
3
3.15
Total Score
39.80
F-75
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: School Boulevard & Cedar Street Intersection Improvements
Priority Ranking: 23.20
Project Type: Street Improvement
Useful Life: 30 years
Responsible Dept.: Engineering/Streets & Alleys
Improve traffic flow and safety at the intersection of School Boulez
Street through the construction of a round -about, or traffic signals.
Improve safety and traffic flows in the area.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 500,000 0 0 0 500,000
Funding Source
2011 Improvement
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 500,000 0 0 0 500.000
on
intersection.
on
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 0 0 0 0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
1.00
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
1
1.25
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
1
1.50
Frequent Problems
1.25
2
2.50
Ability to Finance
1.00
1
1.00
Cost of Project
1.00
1
1.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
000
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
Public Benefit
1.10
Public Demand
1.25
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
Strategic Goal
1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
Total Score
F-76
0 0.00
0 0.00
2 2.00
3 3.30
2 2.50
1 1.10
1 1.05
0 0.00
23.20
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Walnut Street Crosswalk & Boulevard Improvements
Priority Ranking: 45.45
Project Type: Street Improvements
Useful Life: 20 years
Responsible Dept.: Engineering/Streets & Alleys
Replace worn brick and asphalt crosswalks and dilapidated boulevard areas
along Walnut Street. Improve pedestrian safety in the area.
Expenditures 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 10,000 0 0 0 0 10,000
Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 10,000 0 0 0 0 10,000
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Total 100 250 250 250 250
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
3
3.75
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
4
4.00
Cost of Project
1.00
4
4.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
1
1.20
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
4
4.00
Public Benefit
1.10
5
5.50
Public Demand
1.25
3
3.75
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
3
3.30
Strategic Goal
1.05
2
2.10
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
2
2.10
Total Score
45.45
F-77
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Parking Lot Reconstruction
Priority Ranking: 40.10
Project Type: Infrastructure Improvement
Useful Life: 25 years
Responsible Dept.: Streets & Alleys
the City's downtown areas.
res 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
nd/Parking Lots 110,000 110,000
Total 110,000 0 0 0 0 110,000
Funding Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
MM12L
Total 110,000 0 0 0 0 110,000
over ume me parKmg lots win neea some patcnmg, seal coating,
and restriping, but should be minimal compared to current maintenance levels.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 100 300 500 300 500
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
3
4.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
1
1.25
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
1
1.00
Cost of Project
1.00
1
1.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
3
3.60
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
4
4.40
Public Demand 1.25
Synergy with Other Projects 1.10
Strategic Goal 1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component 1.05
Total Score
F-78
5.00
4.40
2.10
2.10
40.10
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Battery Backup Systems for Traffic Signals
Priority Ranking: 48.05
Project Type: Street Improvements
Useful Life: 25 years
Responsible Dept.: Streets & Alleys
busy traffic areas of the City. Improve and maintain traffic flows
power outages occur in the area.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 70,000 20,000 0 0 0 90,000
Funding Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Consolidated Bond Fund 25,000 20,000 45,000
MN/DOT Participation 45,000 45,000
Total 70,000 20,000 0 0 0 90,000
2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
5
7.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
3
3.75
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
2
3.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
1
1.20
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
2
2.40
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
3
3.00
Public Benefit
1.10
5
5.50
Public Demand
1.25
2
2.50
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
2
2.20
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
2
2.10
Total Score
48.05
F-79
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Street Reconstruction Program - Area 4A
Priority Ranking:
43.55
Project Type:
Street Reconstruction
Useful Life:
30 years
Responsible Dept.:
Engineering/Streets & Alleys
Linn, Locust, Maple, Minnesota, Vine, and Walnut Streets. Improvements include; replacing curb,
streets, storm sewer, water mains, sewer mains, replacing the Chestnut lift station, pathway lighting
improvements on Front Str., and adding sidewalks and underground fiber optic lines. The project
should reduce street maintenance costs and make it easier to remove snow and improve Dedestriar
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 1,809,500 87,250 0 0 0 1,896,750
Funding Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
2010 Improvement Bonds 1,809,500 87,250 1,896,750
Total 1,809,500 87,250 0 0 0 1,896,750
as
acting streets should reduce street maintenance costs for patching material.
these streets will need to be seal coated in the future to help maintain them as
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total (500) (200) (200) 100,000 (200)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
2
3.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
1
1.20
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
1
1.20
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
2
2.00
Public Benefit
1.10
4
4.40
Public Demand
1.25
4
5.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
2
2.20
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
3
3.15
Total Score
43.55
F-80
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Street Reconstruction Program - Area 4B
Priority Ranking:
43.55
Project Type:
Street Reconstruction
Useful Life:
30 years
Responsible Dept.:
Engineering/Streets & Alleys
Keconsiruci tast KIVer J[feet from I H 2b to Washington and the surrounding side streets of Cedar,
Hennepin, New, Palm, Ramsey, Washington, and Wright Streets. Project includes replacing curbs,
storm sewers, streets, sanitary sewer mains, adding sidewalks, resurface the parking lots in the parks,
and burying fiber optic lines. Reduce maintenance costs, improve safety and make snow removal easier.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 1,975,000 125,000 0 0 2,100,000
Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
11
0
Total 0 1,975,000 125,000 0 0 2,100,000
(Reconstructing streets should reduce street maintenance costs for patching material.
However these streets will need to be seal coated in the future to help maintain them as
Iona as Dossible.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 (500) (200) (200) 100,000
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
2
3.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
1
1.20
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
1
1.20
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
2
2.00
Public Benefit
1.10
4
4.40
Public Demand
1.25
4
5.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
2
2.20
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
3
3.15
Total Score
43.55
F-81
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: 7th Street Construction
Priority Ranking: 42.85
Project Type: Street Improvement
Useful Life: 25 years
Responsible Dept.: Engineering/Streets & Alleys
r=xtension or tin otreet Trom Minnesota to tim street, including water, sewer,
storm water drainage, and grading. Improve traffic flows in the City of Monticello
by providing a connection from the west side of the City to the east side of the City.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 1,200,000 0 0 0 1,200,000
ng Source
mprovement
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 1,200,000 0 0 0 1,200,000
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011
2012
2013 2014
General Fund/Streets & Alleys
500
500
500 65,000
Total
0
500
500
500 65,000
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
1
1.25
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
3
4.50
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
1
1.20
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
1
1.20
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
0
0.00
Public Benefit
1.10
4
4.40
Public Demand
1.25
4
5.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
2
2.20
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
4
4.20
Total Score
42.85
F-82
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Construction of Fallon Avenue Overpass
Priority Ranking:
47.10
Project Type:
Street Improvement
Useful Life:
50 years
Responsible Dept.:
Engineering/Streets & Alleys
-t an overpass (bridge) over 194 connecting north and south Fallon Avei
better traffic flows from the north and south sided of 194, which will help
and improve business opportunities on both sides of the freeway.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 500,000 4,000,000 1,500,000 0 0 6,000,000
Funding Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 500,000 4,000,000 1,500,000 0 0 6,000,000
overpass
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 0 0 1,000 1,000
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
2
3.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
1
1.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
2
2.40
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
1
1.20
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
0
0.00
Public Benefit
1.10
4
4.40
Public Demand
1.25
4
5.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
4
4.40
Strategic Goal
1.05
4
4.20
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
5
5.25
Total Score
47.10
F-83
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Street Reconstruction Program - Area 5
Priority Ranking: 43.55
Project Type: Street Reconstruction
Useful Life: 30 years
Responsible Dept.: Engineering/Streets & Alleys
Washington between Broadway to either Pine, 4th, or 7th Streets. Improvements will
include replacing curb, gutters, storm sewer, water mains, and sanitary sewer and install
underground fiber optic lines. Reduce maintenance costs and improve snow removal.
itures
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 3,420,000 180,000 0 3,600,000
Revenues 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
2012 Improvement Bonds 3,420,000 180,000 3,600,000
Total 0 0 3,420,000 180,000 0 3,600,000
as
these streets will need to be seal coated in the future to help maintain them as
Im
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 0 (500) (200) (200)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
2
3.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
1
1.20
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
1
1.20
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
2
2.00
Public Benefit
1.10
4
4.40
Public Demand
1.25
4
5.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
2
2.20
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
3
3.15
Total Score
F-84
43.55
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Street Reconstruction Program - Area 6
Priority Ranking:
43.55
Project Type:
Street Reconstruction
Useful Life:
30 years
Responsible Dept.:
Engineering/Streets & Alleys
reconstruct an area of neighborhood streets including Balboul, Nicholas, and Crocus
Circles, Crocus and Hedman Lanes, Marvin Elwood and Prairie Roads, and West River
Street. Improvements include curb repairs and street reclamation, storm sewer extension
on Prairie Road and sanitary sewer and water main extension on West River Street
Reduce maintenance costs and improve snow removal and provide more drivable streets.
res 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 1,724,720 0 1,724,720
Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Water Access Fund
Sanitary Sewer Access Fund
Street Reconstruction Fund
Bond Funds -Special Assessr
M-1
48,920
51,140
705,158
these streets will need to be seal coated in the future to help maintain them as
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total
Priority Ranking
Criteria
0
Weighting
Factor
0 0
Priority
Factor
(500) (200)
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
2
3.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
1
1.20
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
1
1.20
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
2
2.00
Public Benefit
1.10
4
4.40
Public Demand
1.25
4
5.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
2
2.20
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
3
3.15
Total Score
43.55
F-85
48,920
51,140
705,158
753,472
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Industrial Land Purchase
Priority Ranking:
22.80
Project Type:
Land Purchase For Resale
Useful Life:
5 years
Responsible Dept.:
Economic Development
:hase industrial land and resell it at market rate or at a discount to encourage
help industrial development within the City to wide the tax base.
itures
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Total
1.000
Total 0 601,000 0 7,000,000 0 7,601,000
Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
rA
Total 0 601,000 0 7,000,000 0 7,601,000
Operating Budget Impact 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
No future dollar impact.
Total 0 0 0 0 0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
0
0.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
1
1.00
Cost of Project
1.00
1
1.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
4
4.80
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
1
1.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
0
0.00
Public Benefit
1.10
1
1.10
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
5
5.50
Strategic Goal
1.05
4
4.20
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
4
4.20
Total Score
22.80
F-86
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Street Reconstruction Program - Area 7B
Priority Ranking: 42.55
Project Type: Street Reconstruction
Useful Life: 20 years
Responsible Dept.: Engineering/Streets & Alleys
Improve the neighborhood streets of Eastwood and Shady Oak Circles, Eastwood Lane, Briar
Oaks Boulevard, Briar, Oakview and Meadow Oak Courts, Hawthorne Place North and South,
Endicott Trail, and Oak Ridge Drive. Improvements include a street mill and overlay. Reduce
street maintenance costs, make snow removal easier and provide safer streets.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 0 530,734 530,734
Source
Bond Funds -Special Assessments
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
265,367 265,367
Total 0 0 0 0 530,734 530,734
IKeconstructing streets shown reduce street maintenance costs for patching material. I
However these streets will need to be seal coated in the future to help maintain them as
long as possible.
2010 2011 2012
2014
Total 0 0 0 0 (500)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
2
3.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
1
1.20
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
1
1.20
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
1
1.00
Public Benefit
1.10
4
4.40
Public Demand
1.25
4
5.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
2
2.20
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
3
3.15
Total Score
42.55
F-87
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Business Park Monument Sign Construction
Priority Ranking: 19.40
Project Type: Infrastructure Improvement
Useful Life: 30 years
Responsible Dept.: Economic Development
Uonstruct monument signs at the entrance of the City's business park area.
Help encourage businesses into the area by providing an attractive
business park area.
itures
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 20,000 0 0 20,000
Fundinq Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 20,000 0 0 20,000
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011 2012
2013 2014
General Fund
200
200 200
Total
0
0 200
200 200
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
1
1.25
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
0
0.00
Public Benefit
1.10
3
3.30
Public Demand
1.25
2
2.50
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
2
2.20
Strategic Goal
1.05
1
1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
2
2.10
Total Score
19.40
F-88
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Construct Well #6
Priority Ranking:
44.00
Project Type:
Water System Improvement
Useful Life:
50 years
Responsible Dept.:
Engineering/Water
maintain proper water system capacities.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
1.1
Total 0 0 0 1,100,000 0 1.100,000
Funding Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Water Access Fund 1,100,000 1,100,000
Total 0 0 0 1,100,000 0 1,100,000
will increased electrical costs for operating the pumps.
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011 2012
2013 2014
Water Operating Fund
2,500 2,500
Total
0
0 0
2,500 2,500
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
3
4.50
Frequent Problems
1.25
2
2.50
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
3
3.60
Generates Cast Savings
1.20
2
2.40
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
2
2.00
Public Benefit
1.10
3
3.30
Public Demand
1.25
3
3.75
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
2
2.20
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
2
2.10
Total Score
44.00
F-89
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Street Light Improvements
Priority Ranking:
53.95
Project Type:
Infrastructure Improvements
Useful Life:
50 years
Responsible Dept.:
Streets & Alleys
Improve night time visibility and reduce electrical cost by installing more
energy efficient street lights.
itures
provement
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
100,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 400,000
Total 100 000 75.000 75,000 75,000 75,000 400,000
Source
ht Imprc
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
),000 75.000 75.000 75.000 75.000 400.000
Total 100,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 400,000
Ii nis improvement should reduce electric cost when old street lights are replaced with
more energy efficient street lights. When street lights are added to an area which currently
does not have street light, the area will be more visible at night which could reduce
traffic accidents or criminal activitv in the area.
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
General Fund
(150)
(275)
(400)
(500)
(600)
Total
(150)
(275)
(400)
(500)
(600)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
2
3.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
4
5.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
4
4.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
1
1.20
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
4
4.80
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
4
4.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
4
4.00
Public Benefit
1.10
4
4.40
Public Demand
1.25
2
2.50
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
2
2.20
Strategic Goal
1.05
4
4.20
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
3
3.15
Total Score
53.95
F-90
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Trunk Highway 25 Improvements
Priority Ranking: 59.75
Project Type: Street Improvement
Useful Life: 50 years
Responsible Dept.: Engineering/Streets & Alleys
)ossible roundabouts or other road improvements
on Highway 25 through the downtown area.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 2,000,000 2,455,000 0 4,455,000
Funding Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 2,000,000 2,455,000 0 4,455,000
I runK Nignway z5 is maintained by the State of Minnesota. All suture operating costs
would by paid by the State of Minnesota. Depending on the type of improvement or
maintenance, there could by a City share.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 0 0 0 0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
5
7.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
3
4.50
Frequent Problems
1.25
5
6.25
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
1
1.20
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
1
1.20
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
5
5.50
Public Demand
1.25
5
6.25
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
4
4.40
Strategic Goal
1.05
4
4.20
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
5
5.25
Total Score
59.75
F-91
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Ball Field Construction
Priority Ranking:
38.10
Project Type:
Park Improvement
Useful Life:
50 years
Responsible Dept.:
Parks
l:onstruct multiple top of the line baseball, softball, and soccer fields at the
newly acquired Bertram Chain of Lakes park facility. Construction would include
field irrigation systems, fencing, player benches, bleachers, concession stands,
bathrooms, playground equipment, and other amenities. Provide needed athletic facilities in the communitv.
res
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0
Funding Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Consolidated Bond Fund 0
0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0
I ne oevelopment ana construction of ball felas will have a significant impact on
the park maintenance budget. This will include increased employees time for
mowing and maintaining the fields to increased electric and supply costs.
The ability to rent out the facilities for tournaments will also increase revenues.
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011 2012
2013 2014
Based on timing and type of improvements.
Total
0
0 0
0 0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
1
1.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
1
1.25
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
0
0.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
1
1.00
Cost of Project
1.00
1
1.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
4
4.80
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
1
1.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
3
3.00
Public Benefit
1.10
5
5.50
Public Demand
1.25
5
6.25
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
4
4.40
Strategic Goal
1.05
4
4.20
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
4
4.20
Total Score
38.10
F-92
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Construct a New Public Works Facility
Priority Ranking:
53.30
Project Type:
Building Improvements
Useful Life:
50 years
Responsible Dept.:
Public Works Administration
ISTiLT49
one
site. To consolidate the public works operation into one facility for more efficient
ation and to provide proper storage and space for equipment and material
tqe in a safe environment.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 0 9,000,000 9,000,000
Funding Source
Unspecified Funding
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 0 9,000,000 9,000,000
Ii mm
s racry will nave mue ruture Duagetary impact as wnne the tacaity willoe
larger than the current facilities, it will be more energy efficient and provide
additional storage space allowing the City to purchase materials in larger
quantities to take advantaqe of quantities discounts.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
no
Total 0 0 0 0 0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
3
4.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
4
5.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
2
3.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
5
6.25
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
1
1.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
1
1.20
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
3
3.60
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
3
3.30
Public Demand
1.25
3
3.75
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
3
3.30
Strategic Goal
1.05
5
5.25
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
3
3.15
Total Score
53.30
F-93
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Public Works Facility Land Acquisition
Priority Ranking: 59.40
Project Type: Land Purchase
Useful Life: 100 years
Responsible Dept.: Public Works Administration
Purchase 5 to 9 acres of land next to the land purchased for the City's new public works
garage from the Gold Nugget Development. Provide adequate land for the construction
of a new public works facility.
Expenditures 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 200,000 0 0 200.000
Funding Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
General Fund Property Taxes 200,000 200.000
Total 0 0 200,000 0 0 200,000
no
on the site.
Operating Budget Impact 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
No future dollar impact.
Total 0 0 0 0 0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
3
4.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
4
5.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
2
3.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
5
6.25
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
5
5.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
1
1.20
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
3
3.60
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
3
3.30
Public Demand
1.25
�
375
Synergy with Other Projects 1.10
Strategic Goal 1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component 1.05
Total Score
F-94
4.40
5.25
3.15
59.40
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Construct a New Fire Station
Priority Ranking:
37.75
Project Type:
Building Improvement
Useful Life:
50 years
Responsible Dept.:
Fire
istruct a new tire station
provide adequate and efficient space to house fire fighting vehicles and
iipment and training and meeting space for fire fighters.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 0 3,000,000 3,000,000
Funding Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Unspecified Funding Source 3,000,000 3,000,000
Total 0 0 0 0 3,000,000 3,000,000
icilny wiii nave little future budgetary impact as while the
than the current facilities, it will be more energy efficient.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
to
Total 0 0 0 0 0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
3
4.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
3
3.75
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
1
1.00
Cost of Project
1.00
1
1.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
2
2.40
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
5
5.50
Public Demand
1.25
2
2.50
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
1
1.10
Strategic Goal
1.05
2
2.10
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
3
3.15
Total Score
37.75
F-95
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: 95th Street Extension
Priority Ranking: 39.25
Project Type: Road Improvements
Useful Life: 50 years
Responsible Dept.: Engineering/Streets & Alleys
residents living between 1-94 and County Road 39 better access to all
of the City and could help development occur in the east part of the City.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000
Sources
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000
program and snow plowing route.
)me part of the City's road maintenance
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 0 0 0 (500)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
2
3.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
2
2.50
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
1
1.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
1
1.20
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
2
2.40
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
0
0.00
Public Benefit
1.10
4
4.40
Public Demand
1.25
3
3.75
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
2
2.20
Strategic Goal
1.05
2
2.10
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
4
4.20
Total Score
39.25
F-96
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Storm Water Lift Station Construction (TH 25 pond)
Priority Ranking: 49.60
Project Type: Storm Water Improvement
Useful Life: 50 years
Responsible Dept.: Engineering/Public Works Administration
struct a lift (pumping) station on the south side of the City to remove storm
:r from holding ponds so they can flow through the City's storm water system
into the Mississippi River. Reduce the risk of flooding.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
),000 1.000.000
Total 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 1,000,000
Funding Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Storm Water Access Fund 1,000,000 1,000,000
Total 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 1,000,000
sewer
stations.
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011
2012
2013 2014
General Fund
1,000
3,000
3,000
3,000 3,000
Total
1,000
3,000
3,000
3,000 3,000
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
4
6.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
2
2.50
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
2
2.40
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
2
2.40
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
3
3.00
Public Benefit
1.10
4
4.40
Public Demand
1.25
3
3.75
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
3
3.30
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
4
4.20
Total Score
49.60
F-97
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Storm Water Pond Lining
Priority Ranking: 49.30
Project Type: Storm Water Improvement
Useful Life: 25 years
Responsible Dept.: Engineering/Public Works Administration
IInstall a clay liner to existing storm water ponds at Chelsea Road and Fallon
Avenue and between 7th Street and 1-94. Line ponds to address wellhead
protection criteria and increase holding capacity in conjunction with
the Mills Fleet Farm Development.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 200,000 0 0 0 0 200,000
Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
),000 200,000
Total 200,000 0 0 0 0 200,000
IV
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total (2,000) (1,000) (1,000) (1,000) (1,000)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
4
6.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
2
2.50
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
1
1.20
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
1
1.20
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
1
1.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
3
3.00
Public Benefit
1.10
5
5.50
Public Demand
1.25
3
3.75
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
3
3.30
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
4
4.20
Total Score
49.30
F-98
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Pedestrian Crossing Improvements
Priority Ranking: 53.80
Project Type: Infrastructure Improvement
Useful Life: 30 years
Responsible Dept.: Engineering/Streets & Alleys
peaestrian crossings across the various Highways and County Roai
safe and easy pedestrian traffic for walking, bikes, and rollerblading.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Cost unknown 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0
Funding Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Unspecified Funding Source p
Cost unknown
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
on improvements.
Total 0 0 0 0 0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
5
7.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
2
3.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
4
5.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
1
1.20
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
1
1.20
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
5
5.50
Public Demand
1.25
5
6.25
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
3
3.30
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
4
4.20
Total Score
53.80
F-99
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Trunk Sewer Improvements
Priority Ranking: 46.65
Project Type: Infrastructure Improvements
Useful Life: 50 years
Responsible Dept.: Engineering/Public Works Sewer
Improve existing sewer system. Reduce the inflow of clean water into the sanitary
sewer system and reduce the chances of sewer back ups by replacing mains that
are cracked, leaking, or have tree roots infiltrated into them with new mains.
In 2011 it is anticipated that a new sewer trunk will be needed in the Featherstone addition.
res 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 150,000 650,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 1,250,000
Funding Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Sewer Fund/User Fees 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 750,000
Sanitary Sewer Access Fund 500,000
Total 150,000 650,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 750,000
uoula reduce cost of operating waste water treatment plant by reducing the flows
of clean water, which is being treated at the plant, because it has leaked into the
mains through cracks. Could also reduce the risk of sewer back ups by providing
clean sewer mains.
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Sewer Fund
(500)
(1,000)
(1,200)
(1,300)
(1,500)
Total
(500)
(1,000)
(1,200)
(1,300)
(1,500)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
1
1.25
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
5
7.50
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
1
1.20
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
3
3.60
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
3
3.00
Public Benefit
1.10
3
3.30
Public Demand
1.25
2
2.50
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
3
3.30
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
2
2.10
Total Score
46.65
F-100
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Replace Marvin Road Lift Station Pump
Priority Ranking: 35.95
Project Type: Sewer Infrastructure Replacement
Useful Life: 50 years
Responsible Dept.: Engineering/Public Works Sewer
lace the pump in the Marvin Road lift station.
stain proper sewer flows and avoid sewer back ups
homes and businesses.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
1bb,000
Total 0 265,000 0 0 0 265,000
Funding Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 265,000 0 0 0 265,000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
500 500 500 500
Total 0 500 500 500 500
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
1
1.00
Cost of Project
1.00
1
1.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
2
2.40
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
4
4.00
Public Benefit
1.10
4
4.40
Public Demand
1.25
2
2.50
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
3
3.30
Strategic Goal
1.05
1
1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
1
1.05
Total Score
35.95
F-101
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Purchase/Construct a Phosphorous Filter
Priority Ranking: 37.80
Project Type: Waste Water Treatment Plant Improvement
Useful Life: 50 years
Responsible Dept.: Engineering/Public Works Sewer
a
to remove
sphorous from waste water before re-entering the environment.
meet State and Federal guidelines for phosphorous levels for waste water
fitment facilities
2010 2011
2012 2013 2014 Total
1,500,000 1.500.000
Total 0 0 0 1,500,000 0 1,500,000
Source
Sewer Fund Reserves
Special Assessments
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
786,000
464,000
786,000
464,000
Total 0 0 0 1,500,000 0 1,500,000
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011 2012
2013 2014
Sewer Fund
2,000 5,000
Total
0
0 0
2,000 5,000
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
1
1.25
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
5
7.50
Frequent Problems
1.25
2
2.50
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
1
1.20
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
2
2.00
Public Benefit
1.10
4
4.40
Public Demand
1.25
3
3.75
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
1
1.10
Strategic Goal
1.05
1
1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
1
1.05
Total Score
37.80
F-102
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Construct SBR Tank #4
Priority Ranking: 56.65
Project Type: Waste Water Treatment Plant Improvement
Useful Life: 50 years
Responsible Dept.: Engineering/Public Works Sewer
lsiruci a rOurtn StSK tanK at the Waste Water Tre
meet flow capacities due to increase waste flows.
2010 2011 • 2012 2013 2014
Total
0,000
Total 0 0 0 0 1,400,000 1,400,000
Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Sewer Fund Reserves 558,000 558,000
Special Assessments 592,000 592,000
Total 0 0 0 0 1,400,000 1,400,000
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011 2012
2013 2014
Operating impact will begin in 2015.
Total
0
0 0
0 0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
5
7.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
4
6.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
4
5.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
4
4.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
2
2.40
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
2
2.40
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
2
2.00
Public Benefit
1.10
3
3.30
Public Demand
1.25
3
3.75
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
4
4.40
Strategic Goal
1.05
4
4.20
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
4
4.20
Total Score
56.65
F-103
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Interceptor Replacement
Priority Ranking: 54.35
Project Type: Sanitary Sewer Replacement
Useful Life: 50 years
Responsible Dept.: Engineering/Public Works Sewer
place sanitary sewer interceptor trom Hart boulevarc
increase sewer service and prevent sewer back ups
res
2010
2011
2012 2013 2014 Total
3,000 396,000
Total 0 0 396,000 0 0 396.000
Funding Source
Fund
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
396:000
Total 0 0 396,000 0 0 396,000
sewer
to old worn
sewer
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011 2012
2013 2014
Sewer Fund
200
500 500
Total
0
0 200
500 500
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
2
3.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
3
3.60
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
3
3.60
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
3
3.00
Public Benefit
1.10
4
4.40
Public Demand
1.25
3
3.75
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
4
4.40
Strategic Goal
1.05
4
4.20
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
3
3.15
Total Score
54.35
F-104
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Sludge Tank Construction
Priority Ranking: 54.75
Project Type: Waste Water Treatment Plant Improvement
Useful Life: 50 years
Responsible Dept.: Engineering/Public Works Sewer
: a sludge tank to hold sludge until it can be transferred out of the plant.
plant capacity and maintain operation within State and Federal requirements.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
1,800,000 1,800,000
Total 0 0 1,800,000 0 0 1,800,000
Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 1,800,000 0 0 1,800,000
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011 2012
2013 2014
Sewer Fund
1,200 1,200
Total
0
0 0
1,200 1,200
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
3
4.50
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
3
3.60
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
3
3.60
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
3
3.00
Public Benefit
1.10
3
3.30
Public Demand
1.25
3
3.75
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
4
4.40
Strategic Goal
1.05
4
4.20
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
3
3.15
Total Score
54.75
F-105
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Farm Land Purchase
Priority Ranking: 51.25
Project Type: Land Purchase
Useful Life: 100 years
Responsible Dept.: Public Works Sewer
Purchase additional farm land to spread sludge from the City's Waste Water
Treatment Plant as fertilizer. Purchase of additional farm land to spread class B
sludge as fertilizer for crops and reduce treatment costs and delay other plant
upgrades into the future.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
1,300,000
Total 0 0 1,300,000 0 0 1,300,000
Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 1,300,000 0 0 1,300,000
Ii ne C:ity would lease the land to an area farmer for crop planting, which will be a revenue source
for the City. However the City will have the cost of transporting the sludge material to the site and
applyinq it as fertilizer for the crops.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 0 1,200 1,800 2,000
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
4
5.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
4
6.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
2
2.50
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
4
4.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
1
1.20
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
1
1.20
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
1
1.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
4
4.00
Public Benefit
1.10
3
3.30
Public Demand
1.25
1
1.25
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
4
4.40
Strategic Goal
1.05
4
4.20
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
4
4.20
Total Score
51.25
F-106
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Replace 4X4 Regular Cab Truck
Project Ranking: 20.90
Project Type: Equipment Replacement
Useful Life: 10 years
Responsible Dept.: Public Works Sewer/Public Works Water
Kepiace the 4X4 truck used by the water and sewer departments
Reduce repair maintenance cost on City trucks and reduce staff down time
due to equipment repairs.
Expenditures
2010 2011 2012
2013 2014 Total
Water Fund
12,000
12,000
Sewer Fund
10,000
10,000
Total
0 0 22,000
0 0 22,000
Funding Source
2010 2011 2012
2013 2014 Total
Water Fund/User Fees
6,000
6,000
Water Fund/Reserves
6,000
6,000
Sewer Fund/User Fees
5,000
5,000
Sewer Fund/Reserves
5,000
5,000
Total 0 0 22,000 0 0 22,000
uce repair maintenance cost on
to equipment repairs.
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011 2012
2013
2014
Water Fund
(150)
(100)
(100)
Sewer Fund
(150)
(100)
(100)
Total
0
0 (300)
(200)
(200)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
4
5.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
2
2.40
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
4
4.00
Public Benefit
1.10
0
0.00
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
20.90
F-107
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Install SCAD System
Priority Ranking:
55.40
Project Type:
Water and Sewer Improvement
Useful Life:
25 years
Responsible Dept.:
Public Works Sewer/Public Works Water
instan a bUAU system of monitoring all of the City's water and sewer facilities including wells,
pump houses, and lift stations electronically. Improve response time to system problems which
reduce the chance of sewer backups or low water levels of the City's systems.
Water Fund
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
50,000
50,000
Total 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000
Source
Water Fund Revenues
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
50,000
50,000
Total 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000
before they become more problematic.
Sewer
peration cost by alerting staff to problems
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
4
6.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
3
3.75
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
1
1.50
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
3
3.60
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
5
6.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
2
2.00
Public Benefit
1.10
5
5.50
Public Demand
1.25
2
2.50
Synergy with Other Projects 1.10
Strategic Goal 1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component 1.05
Total Score
F-108
4.40
4.20
4.20
55.40
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Existing Water System Improvements
Priority Ranking:
56.95
Project Type:
Infrastructure Improvements
Useful Life:
50 years
Responsible Dept.:
Public Works Water
Improve existing water system and reduce the number of water main brakes and reduce water system
related problems which may affect the City's ability to provide clean water to residents and businesses.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 150,000 150.000 150,000 150,000 150,000 750,000
Funding Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 750,000
prevent the City from providing clean water to residents and businesses.
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Water Fund
(1,000)
(3,000)
(3,000)
(5,000)
(5,000)
Total
(1,000)
(3,000)
(3,000)
(5,000)
(5,000)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
5
7.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
2
3.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
2
2.50
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
5
6.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
4
4.80
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
4
4.00
Public Benefit
1.10
4
4.40
Public Demand
1.25
2
2.50
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
4
4.40
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
4
4.20
Total Score
56.95
F-109
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Water Main Extension
Priority Ranking:
55.80
Project Type:
Water Improvement
Useful Life:
50 years
Responsible Dept.:
Public Works Water
instruct a 16 -inch water
prove water service.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
126,000 126,000
Total 0 0 0 126,000 0 126.000
Funding Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 126,000 0 126,000
result in the maintenance of additional miles of water mains in the future. These c
be offset by the ability to add customers and revenues into the City's water system.
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011 2012
2013
2014
Water Fund
(100)
(500)
Total
0
0 0
(100)
(500)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
5
7.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
2
3.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
2
2.50
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
5
6.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
3
3.60
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
2
2.00
Public Benefit
1.10
4
4.40
Public Demand
1.25
2
2.50
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
4
4.40
Strategic Goal
1.05
4
4.20
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
4
4.20
Total Score
55.80
F-110
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Booster Station Upgrade
Priority Ranking:
56.20
Project Type:
Water System Improvement
Useful Life:
50 years
Responsible Dept.:
Public Works Water
pressure
out the system, even on higher elevations of the City.
i proper water pressure through out the City.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
125,000
Total 0 0 0 125,000 0 125,000
Funding Source
Fund Reserves
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 125,000 0 125,000
same maintenance as the Citv's current
2010 2011
2012 2013 2014
Total 0 0 0 0 0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
5
7.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
2
3.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
4
5.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
3
3.60
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
3
3.60
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
3
3.00
Public Benefit
1.10
4
4.40
Public Demand
1.25
4
5.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
3
3.30
Strategic Goal
1.05
3
3.15
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
3
3.15
Total Score
56.20
F-111
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Purchase/Replace Liquor Store Display/Shelving Units
Priority Ranking:
21.50
Project Type:
Store Improvements
Useful Life:
50 years
Responsible Dept.:
Liquor Operations
Add and/or replace liquor store shelves and display units.
Improve the looks of the store and make it more attractive to shop and find items.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
5,000 5,000
Total 0 0 5,000 0 0 5,000
Funding Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 5,000 0 0 5,000
fcnase should have very little operational impact once purchased. However,
a more attractive store where it is easy to find products may increase sales over
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 0 0 0 0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
2
2.50
Ability to Finance
1.00
4
4.00
Cost of Project
1.00
4
4.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
2
2.40
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
1
1.20
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
0
0.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
4
4.00
Public Benefit
1.10
1
1.10
Public Demand
1.25
1
1.25
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
1
1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
21.50
F-112
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Replace Cash Register System
Priority Ranking: 25.45
Project Type: Equipment Replacement
Useful Life: 10 years
Responsible Dept.: Liquor Operations
Improve efficiencies and take advantage of new technology.
itures
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
15,000 15,000
Total 0 15,000 0 0 0 15,000
Funding Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 15,000 0 0 0 15,000
mupiacmg uie casn register system wni nave nme impact on operating costs,
but could improve efficiencies of maintaining inventories and reordering of goods.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 (50) (100) (100) (100)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
1
1.25
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
4
5.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
4
4.80
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
1
1.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
4
4.00
Public Benefit
1.10
1
1.10
Public Demand
1.25
1
1.25
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
1
1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
25.45
F-113
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Replace Liquor Store Carpet
Priority Ranking:
15.65
Project Type:
Improvement
Useful Life:
15 years
Responsible Dept.:
Liquor Operations
ce wore out carpet in the City liquor store.
the liquor store a more attractive place to shop.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 38,000 - 0 0 38.000
Source 2010 2011 2012 2013
2014 Total
38.000
Total 0 0 38,000 0 0 38,000
budgets
i nave no impact on
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 0 0 0 0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
2
2.50
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
4
4.00
Public Benefit
1.10
0
0.00
Public Demand 1.25
Synergy with Other Projects 1.10
Strategic Goal 1.05
Comprehensive Plan Component 1.05
Total Score
F-114
0.00
1.10
1.05
0.00
15.65
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Replace and Redesign Checkout Counters
Priority Ranking:
17.15
Project Type:
Improvement
Useful Life:
25 years
Responsible Dept.:
Liquor Operations
(Replace the current wore checkout counters in the liquor store and redesign
the checkout area to improve efficiencies and attractiveness of the store.
Improved efficiency of the checkout process and improve the look of the
liquor store.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 45,000 0 0 0 45,000
Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Liquor Fund Reserves
45,
Total 0 45,000 0 0 0 45,000
aticiencies in the checkout process, reduce clutter, and impro,
area to the store floor, which could result in less product theft.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 (100) (150) (150) (150)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
2
2.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
2
2.40
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
0
0.00
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
17.15
F-115
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Replace Liquor Store Coolers
Priority Ranking: 20.30
Project Type: Improvement
Useful Life: 25 years
Responsible Dept.: Liquor Operations
existing large coolers due to age.
maintenance and energy costs by replacing old inefficient coolers.
res
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 10,000 0 10,000 20,000
Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 10,000 0 10,000 20,000
Uperating budget Impact
2010 2011
2012
2013
2014
Liquor Fund
(500)
(700)
(1,200)
Total
0 0
(500)
(700)
(1,200)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
2
2.50
Ability to Finance
1.00
3
3.00
Cost of Project
1.00
3
3.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
4
4.80
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
2
2.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
0
0.00
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
20.30
F-116
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Purchase Additional Security Cameras
Priority Ranking: 34.20
Project Type: Equipment Purchase
Useful Life: 10 years
Responsible Dept.: Liquor Operations
rcnase adottional security cameras Tor the city liquor operations
ovide a safe environment in and outside the City liquor store and
reduce theft of items through monitoring of the store
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 3,000 0 3,000
Source
2010 2011
2012 2013
2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 3,000 0 3 000
tional security cameras will provide better store coverage,
loss through customer theft.
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011 2012
2013
2014
Liquor Fund
(150)
(150)
Total
0
0 0
(150)
(150)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
3
4.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
4
5.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
2
2.50
Ability to Finance
1.00
4
4.00
Cost of Project
1.00
4
4.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
2
2.40
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
4
4.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
2
2.00
Public Benefit
1.10
3
3.30
Public Demand
1.25
2
2.50
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
34.20
F-117
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Purchase Additional Security Cameras
Priority Ranking: 34.20
Project Type: Equipment Purchase
Useful Life: 10 years
Responsible Dept.: Department of Motor Vehicles
I o add additional security cameras to existing system to provide better building and
parking lot coverage. Provide a safe work environment for employees and customers.
itures
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
1.500
Total
,500
Total 0 1.500 0 0 0 1,500
Source
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 1,500 0 0 0 1.500
Iuonai security cameras will provide better coverage
of break-ins or poor behavior of customers.
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011 2012
2013 2014
No future dollar impact.
Total
0
0 0
0 0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
3
4.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
4
5.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
2
2.50
Ability to Finance
1.00
4
4.00
Cost of Project
1.00
4
4.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
2
2.40
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
4
4.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
2
2.00
Public Benefit
1.10
3
3.30
Public Demand
1.25
2
2.50
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
34.20
F-118
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Purchase a Cash Register System for the Motor Vehicle Department
Priority Ranking:
15.75
Project Type:
Equipment Purchase
Useful Life:
15 years
Responsible Dept.:
Department of Motor Vehicle (DMV)
rurcnase Tive casn registers and related software for the front counters of th
Improve efficiencies of processing DMV transactions and provide for a safer
storage of operating funds at the counter area.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 3,000 0 0 0 3,000
Source
1111 LTA KA 0
2010 2011
2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 3,000 0 0 0 3,000
Operating Budget Impact
2010
2011
2012
2013 2014
DMV Fund
10
10
10 10
Total
0
10
10
10 10
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
3
3.75
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
0
0.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
5
5.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
5
5.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
0
0.00
Public Benefit
1.10
0
0.00
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
15.75
F-119
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Purchase Two Computers for Motor Vehicle Operations
Priority Ranking:
22.50
Project Type:
Equipment Purchase
Useful Life:
5 years
Responsible Dept.:
Department of Motor Vehicles
ircnase two new computer workstations for the two new front counter win(
the City operated Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV).
Dvide functioning front counter windows to wait on customers at the DMV.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 4,000 0 0 0 0 4,000
Funding Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
DMV Fund 4,000 4,000
Total 4,000 0 0 0 0 4.000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 0 0 0 0
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Factor
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
4
5.00
Ability to Finance
1.00
5
5.00
Cost of Project
1.00
2
2.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
5
5.00
Public Benefit
1.10
0
0.00
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
0
0.00
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
22.50
F-120
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name:
Purchase Five Credit Card Processing Machines for DMV
Priority Ranking:
21.50
Project Type:
Equipment Purchase
Useful Life:
10 years
Responsible Dept.:
DMV
ne State approves the use of credit cards at DMV's, purchase five ci
)cessors for the workstations at the DMV. More efficient processing
licenses at the DMV to attract additional customers.
itures
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 2,500 0 0 0 0 2.500
Funding Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
DMV Fund 2,500 2,500
Total 2.500 0 0 0 0 2,500
acceptance of credit cards could increase business and t
reduce the number of NSF checks and their related fees.
2010 2011
revenues
2013 2014
Total (100) (100) (100) (100) (100)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
0
0.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
3
3.75
Ability to Finance
1.00
5
5.00
Cost of Project
1.00
0
0.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
0
0.00
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
1
1.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
0
0.00
Public Benefit
1.10
3
3.30
Public Demand
1.25
5
6.25
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
2
2.20
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
21.50
F-121
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Construct a Water Treatment Facility
Priority Ranking: 56.50
Project Type: Facility Construction
Useful Life: 50 years
Responsible Dept.: Water Department
facility will include chemical treatment and gravity filters.
ide safe, drinkable water and to able to operate at as a class A or B
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 6,000,000 0 6,000,000
Fundi
Water
Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 0 0 0 6,000,000 0 6,000,000
water treatment facility would require routine purchases of chemicals for water treatment al
th routine maintenance of the facility itself and the cost of the various utilities to operate the
Im
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total 0 0 0 20,000 30,000
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
5
7.50
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
2
2.50
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
4
6.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
2
2.50
Ability to Finance
1.00
1
1.00
Cost of Project
1.00
4
4.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
4
4.80
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
0
0.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
3
3.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
3
3.00
Public Benefit
1.10
4
4.40
Public Demand
1.25
4
5.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
4
4.40
Strategic Goal
1.05
4
4.20
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
4
4.20
Total Score
56.50
F-122
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Capital Improvement Plan 2010 Thru 2014
Project Name: Sign Lab System
Priority Ranking: 30.05
Project Type: Equipment Purchase
Useful Life: 10 years
Responsible Dept.: Streets & Alleys
signs and banners in-house. Reducing the cost of signs by producing them
compared to outsourcing.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
15.000
Total
15,000
Total 15,000 0 0 0 0 15.000
Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Total 15,000 0 0 0 0 15,000
Im
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total (3,000) (3,000) (3,000) (3,000) (3,000)
Priority Ranking
Weighting
Priority
Criteria
Factor
Factor
Score
Public Health & Safety
1.50
2
3.00
Employee Health & Safety
1.25
0
0.00
Regulatory Mandate
1.50
0
0.00
Frequent Problems
1.25
1
1.25
Ability to Finance
1.00
4
4.00
Cost of Project
1.00
4
4.00
Generates Revenue
1.20
2
2.40
Generates Cost Savings
1.20
5
6.00
Ongoing Operation Costs
1.00
5
5.00
Age or Condition of Existing
1.00
0
0.00
Public Benefit
1.10
2
2.20
Public Demand
1.25
0
0.00
Synergy with Other Projects
1.10
2
2.20
Strategic Goal
1.05
0
0.00
Comprehensive Plan Component
1.05
0
0.00
Total Score
30.05
F-123