City Council Agenda Packet 05-10-1976AGENDA
Regular Meeting Monticello City Council
May 10, 1976 - 7:30 P.M.
Mayor Con Johnson
Councilmen: Denton Erickson, Stanley Hall.
Dick Mantic, Gene Walters
Meeting to be taped.
Citizen Comments - P&AWWP,4MZ*.v- JAw PA -Al.- -oAK LAWG
%00P1. Rezoning Request for Elderly Housing - John Dergstad.
-00t. Continuation of Public Hearing on Sewer and Water
Extensions West County Road {f39
✓3. Public Hearing Vacation of Oak Street
.A ._ of Rezoning of Curtis Hoglund Property
at Northerly Intersection of County Road #75 and
County Road #39 from R-3 to D-4•
5. Presentation by Ed McCulloch, State Highway District
Traffic Engineer on Proposed 1-94 Lighting System
u. Presentation by Dud Schleif on Park Grading and
Landscaping.
7. Consideration of Chamber of Commerce's use of Informa-
tional Center.
S. Consideration of Proposed Joint Fire Contract with
Township of Monti -cello
11. Consideration of Alternate for Monticello Orderly
Annexation Ikiard
10. Approval oC Planned I)se Report - Pedera.l Revenue
Sharing.
]I. Approval of April- 20, 1076 minutes
1:. Cnfinirthrd business.
13. New buniness
Mailing to: CounrII
John nadalirh
Mike Holm
Dun .4milh
John Sandberg
Jean PnWers
John nergxtad
Ward Kinq
John Al baugh
Pat Donahue
Dud Schleif
Doug Pitt
Ken Maus
Curtis HoKlund
MunticelIo Country 01111)
Fd MrCu'Ilot h
AGENDA SUPPLEMIiNT
Q 'tem I. Rezoning Request for Elderly Housing - John Bergstad.
This matter was taken up at the March 16, 1976 Planning
Commission meeting and the main problem centered around
the parking requirements. Included in the fifty unit
proposal was parking for twenty five spaces.
Contacts were made with several outstate communities
with parking for'clderly units varying from 22 to 50
per cant. In talking; to various cities they expressed
differences of opinions as to whether 50 per cent was
adequate and some had experienced some problems. however,
there were others who have twenty five per cent and they
felt this was adequate.
A pot.i.t.i.on has been received from senior citizens .i.n-
dicatIng 103 people would be interested in an elderly
housing project. Almost 55 per cent further indicated
they needed a parking space, however, in talking with
Karen Hanson, senior citIzen center director, she indicated
that this per cent drops way clown when considering those
on the petition who would fa.l 1 in the lower income categories.
A petit -ion has also been received from fifteen property
(j owners in the arca who are opposed to the project.
L. Mr. Bergstad has been working on obtaining additional land
for parking thrnugh means of outright- purchase or option,
which he would exerc3.se as the need arises.
Also of some concern was the, ability of the fire department
to fight a fire in a three, story building. T have talked
to tha fire chief, Red Mi.r:hacl.is, and he was concerned
that the apartment should have a spr.i.nkler system and Mr.
Bergstad i-ndicated this would be puL in. The city does
not, own a ladder truck so nrldi.ti.onnl ground ladders would
have to be purchased for a t.hreo story building.
At their Apri 1 20, 1 976 meei,i.ng, the, Planning Commission
recommended approval. of:
1 Rczon.i.ng from R-2 to R -Il to allow for elderly
housing unit,.
-. Conditional Ilse permit (thi.s .i.s required 1n an R -B).
3. A varinnco on side yard set -bock requirement be
urruit.d to al. ,low for 10 feet side yard set. -hack
.instead of required 20 fent.
IQ
4. To allow parking variance provided 33 spaces were
Put .in i.nitia.11y. Ordinance calls for 50%
parking with capabilities of expanding to 100%
as considered necessary by the council.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Approval or denial of above requests.
References: 2 petitions. planning report by Howard
Dahlgren (sent with last meeting's agend4, Planning
Commission minutes of April 20, 1976.
Item 2. Continuation of Public licaring on Sewer and Water Extensions
West County Road ,N39.
As you recall at the hearing April 26, a decision was
tabled until the assessment to the Monticello Country
Club could be given further cons! derat.i.on.
At the April 26, 1976 meeting the assessments on a per
parcel basis (100 foot frontage) were $4863 with the Country
Club being assessed for only one parcel. If Uhe Country
Club were to be assessed for 13 parcels (based on front
footage of 1350 feet) the per parcel assessment would be
reduced to $3367 and the Country Club being assessed $43758.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Deci.si.on whether to order improvement in
and if improvement ordered the number of parcel assess-
ments to charge the Country Club.
l.tem 3. Publ. ir. Hearing Vacation of Oak Street.
The %1nnt.i.ccj to-Illg Lake Hospital. has requested the city
vacate Oak Street. Purpose of request is to allow use
of unrated street as an exit, from t:hc.i.v existing parking Int.
Mr- frit Dolialllle owns rho property to the other side of Oak
Street and the. Ilospi tal .indicated he would be agreeable
to and in favor• of the vacation.
It would appeal- that Oak Street would never be completed
but. the
city shoo Id retain utility ensemellt rights.
A quit claim decd could be conveyed to the adjacent, pro -
11,31 -Ly owners, granting each ono -half of the street.
My veconlmendati.on would be n $1 sales price to each and
t.hn cost of attorney fees to be spl.i,t between the Hospital
and !11,. Donahuo in prepaying the. deed.
Add.i tlonally, the hospi tal would like to di6ellsB the.
pnssibi-l.i.ty of enlarging their existing parking lot, to
twice i,ts s.i-ze and ill nyder to do so would need a variance
to use a portion of the brtllevnvd. This would not entail
any reducing the road w.i.dt:h, nn.ly the right:-of-w:.'ly,
-2-
POSSIBLE ACTION:
I . Decision on whether to vacate Oak Street, and sales
price if a deed is conveyed.
`- 2. Council's reaction to allowing Hospital to use
port -ion of boulevard for parking.
Rcfercnccs: Enclosed map.
Item 4. Continuation of Rezoning of Curtis Hoglund Property at
Northerly Intersection of County Road 15 and County Road
434 from R-3 to B-4.
At. their April 20. 1976 meeting, the Planning Commission
recommended a portion of Curtis Hoglund's property (ap-
proximately 2?; acres) be rezoned from k-3 to B-4 to
allow future expansion of Curtis Ilogiund's Machinery Sales
area. Additionally, this would require addingmachinery
sales as a permitted or conditional use in a B-4 zone.
Mr. Iloglund owns approx.i.mato.ly 10 acres on this northerly
suction of the interscctlon of County 039 and County Road
M and desired to rezone the entire arca except for a
port..ion for his residence. Howard Dahlgren's recommcndat.inn,
with which the Planning Commission concurred, was to create
n buffer zone between We machinery sales open and resid-
cotia 1 property to the north, northeast and northwest allowing
for a more compati.blo I1-3 zoning rather than going .i.m-
mediately from a B-4 to rur R-1-
POSSIBLE
-1.
POSS1BLE KTlON:
I Approval. or denial of zoning change from an R-3
Lo a B-4 as designated on enclosed map.
_. Approval or denial of allowing Machinery Salus as
a permi t ut use or condi t-i,onn 1 use in a B-4 zone.
in order fur tho council to better control such
sales activity I would recommend conditional use.
Refcretu;es: Howard Dahlgren's Planning Report (soil.
wi I.h Inst menl..i.ng's agenda) , mnp of nren , Planning
Conunission minutes of April 20, 1976.
:Item 5. 1'venent.a1,1on by Cd Mectil loch, Sl;nte Ilighwny 1)lstric1; 'Prafflc
Lugincnr on Ih•npnsed T-94 Lighl.ina System.
?Ir, %icCulloch. of the State Highway Distt•let Off.i-cc in
Brainerd, will be at the meeting Atrnulay to review the
mate's proposed l.i.ghting sysUem Por Idle L-94 Interchange.
Addit.ionnlly, Mr. McCnl.lnrh will be seeking the elty's
respnnsu to a lighting system .leading Prom the.i.ntorchnnge
Zinto the dowmtown area.
-3-
Estimated costs to the city would be $21,000 for 14
lights and the State portion which is for the interchange.
calls for 20 lights at an estimated cost of $30.000•
Estimated costs are exclusive of ono necring fees.
Mr. McCulloch has suggested sodium lights which are more
expensive but are more efficient than the mercury vapor
1.i.ghLs.
Project .is scheduled for November bidding and summer of
1977 construction.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Indication to the state whether city is
interested in pursu.ing a .light.i.ng system along 25 from
1-94 into downtown arca and determination of next; step
necessary.
item 6.Present:at.i_on by Rud Schl.i.ef on Park Grading and Landscaping.
Mr. Schli.cf will be at Monday's mect;.ing to discuss prn-
posed grading and landscaping of the city's parks in accord-
ance with the park development plan.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Dependent: upon council's concurrence with
presentatinn, timing and costs decision as whether to
hire Dud Sch I ief to tlo necessary work.
'item 7. Consideration of Chamber of Commerce's use of 1"nformat:i onn I
Center.
Fen ?Inns. President: of the Monticello Chamber of Commerce,
would like to discuss the Chamber's use of the informational
center with the. ernrnci 1.
Items to be covered include the following:
1. Can they use. it? yLS s. Ta(e . A it • w.rq JIwNt
2. Renc?
3. u L H. t;J es?
4. 11011 VS of operat;ion? 1A 1? To +4Z.,
POSSIBLE ACTION: Tnd.iOnt:.ion of connci 1's views on possible
agreement with Chamber of Commerce on use of informational
cc" tor.
Ttom $. Cmncidcratinn of Propnmed in.int Fire Cnntrnrt w1a Tnwunhlu
of Mnneicol.ln.
Enc.ln & for your review in n proposed fire conumet. drawn
up by the Township's nttorney, vev:iewed by myself and our
OILY atwrncy.
-4-
You wi 1 L note the contract establishes a joint advisory
board consisting of one member from the city, one member
from the township and one member from the fire department
to act as an advisory board. Also to be noted Ls the
clurati.on of the contract which i.s for 10 years Reasoning
for this is to avoid the annual rewriting of the contract
There is a provision for either party to tcrmi.nate contract
after ISO clays written notice.
Payment. for the 1974 and 1975 fire agreement has bean
received in the amount of $6,000 from the Township.
They will be tnak.Lng a final adjustment payment Ghat would
appear to be $335-37 bringing their total payment for
1974 and 1975 to $6335.37.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Tf council concurs, approval of fire
contract and naming of city's representative on three
man board. Because of other commitments, the Township
is in favor of ncndmg an individual other than a super-
visor to this board.
References: Proposed Fire Contract. Fire Department. costs
1974 and 1975.
Item 9. Considerat.inn of Alternate for Mnnt:icello OMc,rly Annesntion
QMOM, rd.
At the lass. moeti.ng of the above board it was cleci.ded
I;,) have alternates appointed for the representative
Prom the 'I•owns:hip (Pranklin Denn) and the City ( Mayor
Johnson). Th.i_s to Insure that each pnrty has a voting
member at. Ile mr.eting should the original appointee be
unable to show up.
Possible Action: Consideratlein nP appointment of
nitornntes.
Item 10. Apprnvn I or Planned Use Report - Federal Revenue. Shnr.inq.
0
Vol- the period .111.1y 1, 1976 through December 31, 1916
0a City or Moint,Lcullo will receive $16,4S1 Ln federal
Revunnc Sharing. In comparison for the porind from
July I, 1975 Wough ;Ione, 30, 1976 Mnnt.icello .is scheduled
to receive $:Z,317 so rnt nn nnnunl basisMnnti.rel.lo's
al lurntrion is up over $10,000 ns a result of increased
local Cas ePfc+rt on the part of 'the City
-5-
Revenue Sharing is to terminate December 31, 19763
however it is certain to continue beyond this date as
a result of an election year.
Federal. Revenue Sharing regulations require council
authorization of a planned use report. I would recommend
the $16,481 be allocated'in'the following fashion:
$13,000 Bandstand
3.481 Historical Information Center
$16,481
It should be noted this is a Planned Use Report and as
such the douncil is committed to the allocation indicated
if it is decided the money should be implemented in an-
other fashion.
Possible Action: If council concurs, approval of funds
as .indicated.
;Item 11. Approval of April 26, 1976 minutes.
Item 12. Unfinished business.
Item 13. New business.
Imo'
t.
am
1. To Whom I t May Concern:
a We the undersigned Senior Citizens, wish to make it
known, that there is a definite need for low -rent housing
for the elderly in Monticello. We would be interested in
using these facilities if they were offered in Monticello:
ri'K n Nre•d a parking spat h No - Does not. nerd Parking Apace
1.
Mrs. Leona Elwell
No
2.
Mrs. Elsie Nimmo
No
3.
Mrs. Mabel Othoudt
No
4.
Hazel Chamberlin
No
5.
Lucy Andrews
Yes
6.
John Schmidt
Yes
7.
Christein Miller
No
1.
Mr. and Mrs. W. M. Lehn
Yes
g.
Hulda H. Smith
No
10.
Mr. and Mrs. Harry Schaffer
Yes
11.
Mr. and Mrs. Frank Peterson
Yes
12.
Mr. and Mrs. Marion Larson
Yes
13.
Mr. and Mrs. Clifford Ch riatiansonYes
14.
Oscar Anderson
No
1,5.
Connie Decker
No
16.
Mr. and Mrs. Henry Mei.ntsma
Yes
17.
Mr. and Mrs. Gilmer Lee
Yes
19.
Mrs. Beatrice Davis
Yes
19.
Mrs. Margaret Lind
Yea
20.
Mrs. Hattie Marx
No
21.
Mr. and Mrs. Earl Benson
Yes
22.
Mrs. Ruth Kletach
Yes
23.
Mr. and Mrs. Walter Clason
Yes
24.
Mrs. Margaret May
No
25.
Mr. and Mrs. Robert Dow.lIng
Yes
26.
Esther M. Miers
No
27.
Floyd Trunnell
Yes
2S.
Elmer Daysinger
Yes
29.
Victoria Anderson
No
30.
Fern Hanson
No
31.
Theresa Krautbauer
No
32.
Viola Schneider
Yes
33.
Huida Pearson
No
34.
Ruth Erickson
Yes
35.
Don Wildman
Yes
36.
Ploy McCoy
Yes
77.
Mr. and Mrs. Hugh McKinnon
Yes
3S.
Cordelin Ellison
Yes
39.
Carl E. Lind
No
40.
Mr. and Mrs. Herb F.11lott
Yes
41.
Mathi.lda Ward
Yes
42.
Viola Irish
Yes
43.
Ilrlen Mi'halls
No
ri'K n Nre•d a parking spat h No - Does not. nerd Parking Apace
t�-r
- c
M
44.
Mr. and Mrs. James Deal
No
45.
Mr. and Mrs. Wm. Veches
Yes
46.
Mrs. Bob Dahlgren
No
47•
Mrs. E. Lundquist
Yes
4S.
Mr. and Mrs. Wm. Sparrow
Yes
49.
Ethel DI'OUiliard
No
50.
Rose Niezgoski
No
51.
Rose Roskowyts
No
52.
Annie 7,achman
Yes
53.
Mayme Menth
No
54.
ELia Wolff
No
55.
Kathryn Miers
No
56.
Marie Carlson
No
57.
Margaret Gahr
No
5S.
LeRoy Jenson
Yes
59.
Mary Gutzw_i.licr
No
60.
Ernest Klatt.
Yes
61.
John Miller, Sr.
Yes
62.
Eugene C. llctiond
No
63.
M1•. and Mrs. E. R. Abrahamson
Yes
64.
Mrs. Opal Major
Yes
65.
Mur.icl Johnson
No
66.
Marie Ann Bruning
Yes
67•
lid Abe rmiIJcr
No
6S.
Mr. and Mrs. Arthur Sehnmacher
Yes
69.
Floyd Westhaha.1.1
No
70.
Martin J. P.ischke
No
71.
Mr. -"nd 1`11•s. lilmer Dc Long
Yes
72.
Louise Engel
No
73.
%Ir. and Mrs. Archie ptcBachern
Yes
74.
George Dc,'tars
Yes
75.
Ceorge Kaz
Yes
70.
Mr. and Mrs. Maur.icc Murray
No
77.
Esther M. Anderson
Yes
7S.
Ed Klein
Yes
79.
Dlr. and l,11 -s. Iver Anderson
Yes
SO.
Blanche Jensen
No
S1.
r11•. rind rj14. Charles J. Anderson
No
S2.
Mrs. Amelia Myers
No
S3.
William Jongewanrd
Yes
84.
Mitis Sophi.n Dicdr.Ich
Nn
S.J.
virg.ini.a P.lntten
Yes
S6.
Mt 10 Moon, Sr.
Yes
87•
`11,. and Mrs. Frank Lehn
yes
S5.
Lnrarino Weir
Yes
S9.
Rrlrhel Sherman
No
90.
hllznbct.h Stenglin
No
91.
!lr. and Mrs W. J. llpwo0d
Yes
92.
Mrs. Mclv.i.n Mnnres
Yes
93•
Dorothy Jane Morres
No
91.
0. S. Johnson
No
95.
Harry Stokes
Yes
96.
Clarence Huseth
Yes
97.
Mr. and Mrs. M. Menzel
No
98.
Mr. and Mrs. Gordon Pearson
Yes
99.
Mary S. Swenson
No
100.
Winnic Burkholder
No
101.
Mr. and Mrs. John Prehner
Yes
102.
Viola Schoepf
Yes
103.
Hazel Kotilinck
No
s� its
/Vo
Cupled by Karen Hanson, Director Monticello
SenLov CtUzena Center. Original Copy at
Senior Citizens.
-3-
cP
March, 22. Iy76
Village Council of Monticello, Un.
(Monticello PlannipC Commission)
City Adninietrator Cary vasber
We the umdcraigned declare that we do not want any consideration of rezon-
irc of Lots 1-2-3-9-& 10 Block C within the City of Monticello Vn, from
R 2 (sist.le and two f,_uily residential) to R B ( residential-bucincas).
ae Lq not want say pvxt of Block C* now toned as R 2 ( circle & two
:daily residential);" D"$VD DD to R 9 ( residential h business).
Por do we wknt any consideration of conditional use permit for a 50 uaIt
elderly houeirl;_ complex on the property described above.
j
I
�MTr
,.
., ri 11 t'�'•
t,, t .
I
�MTr
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
The City Council of Monticello hereby ordains
that the Zoning Ordinance Map be amended as follows:
Rezoning of a 2:1 acre parcel. of land
located north of County Road #75 (Broad --
May) and west of County Road #39 east in
the City of Monticello from R-3 (Medium
density residential) to B -Q (Regional
business) according to the official zoning map
on file at City hall.
Passed by Lite City Council this 10th day
of May, 19-,0.
�
C.70— John�elon
Mayor
ATTCST: �L�r t�%�
1'L.Slr
Gary wieyL•:•
City Administrator
14
41A. j w..+ v - F; "S 'cr /2
11l ,t,/ \� \ F0. 1 ,r�/ �, XtA
IN
AM
I .",
I
14L...
ORDINUCE AMENDMENT
The City Council of Monticel-lo hereby ordains
the following, zoning ordinance amendment:
$o,tiun 10-14-4 under conditional uses for
s N-4 (11--c,ional 1losinehs) district. Machinery
Saleh be added as sub b+•ction (E).
Passed by the C-ity Council this 10th day or
GaryWieb•
Admit:iRtr roe'
IL
r,
C f 0. ,J0116son
Mayor
EM
V,
(DFor standard keyway see 1 3/4': 2 1/4"
Std. Plate No. 1141. '.••.
1 KEYWAY ALTERNATE Q
3
No. 4 . 2' 6" Reinforcing 3• It 3 6q_ 1/2' R' TABLE OF CUBIC YARDS PER LINEAL FOOT
Steel t?' 6" C. to c.) 6 \/ •71'j�:.•'' N
! r ••::•:e;Dimension "H" I 6" 7" 8" 9' 1n"
6LLSurlacin rr �( 8" 0.0394 0.0423 0_0449 0.0481 0.0512
P ` ` `� °'`''� I • 9° 0.0430 0.0460 0_0487 0.0519 0.0552
7 • "
Concrete Ba iii +':.::;'•�'� Hl0_0 04.9_7 0_0524 O.OSSB O.OS91
jam' I 11" 0.0502 0.0534 0.0562 0.0596 0.0631
l t •• �.:;. .i'•:' j 12" 0.0538 0.0571 0.0599 O.U63 10.671
�j 1•+1'
DESIGN BR N -N1
(EXAMPLE BR 6-9)
Edge of Planned Surface -*4
Same Slope as - `-
Surface of Roadway 1/2' R
.lam .� •:v,' •e. •'a .•4 a'••
2'-0"-- �1
DESIGN 0
hp.
DESIGN S
I T Concrete
Gutter Cu. Yds. Lin. Fl. Per
ickness Per Lin. Ft. Cu. Yd.
3 j" 0.0490
B. 0.0552
9" 0.0613 163
8'�-0.0675_ , 14.8
7" when adjacent Surface Is Bituminous.
When adjacent Surface Is Pavement -
Same Thickness as slab.
SECTION WHEN ADJACENT TO BASE
Q L2KT and L2KTB Joint when adjacent to
rl9id pavement or base. See Std. Plates
1140 C 1141 for joint and keyway.
O2 Slope 3/4"per It. normal unless
Otherwise stated In plan.
W Concrete
Design Gutter Cu. Yds. Lin. Fl. T61
_ Nth Per Lin. Ft. C.i. yds.
1_•1(2 0.0541 1193
$� _1@-1f2"„ 0.0649 15,4_
� 4.1/2" 9.07j1 13.2
X39_ J9-1/2" 0.0965 11.14
_536_ 6.1/2" 0.0973 10.3
DESIGN BR
All curb 110041 measurements an In relation to adjacent gaiter slope. DESIGN D
DESIGN S
APP23v[o Mey 21. 1973 lL4EeF MINNESOTA
IrjeIne.noN slaNpaw
DEPARTAoENT OF HIGHRATt REFERENCE PLATE
1, �� CONCRETI CURB AND GUTTER "J
�, (DESIGN OR, DESIGN D, and DESIGN Sl 2531 7102 E
1S4OOPOP,.MeN+ S'-,o.,� I)y