City Council Agenda Packet 01-12-1981AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
January 12, 1981 - 7:30 P.M.
Mayor: Arve Grimsmo
Council Members: Dan Blonigen, Fran Fair, Ken Maus, Philip White.
Meeting to be taped.
Invocation by Reverend Steve Hammer
Citizens Comments -
1. Consideration of the Award of the Sale of $160,000 General Obligation
Improvement Bonds of 1981 and $255,000 in General Obligation Bonds
of 1981 for Library.
2. Consideration of Resolution Ordering Feasibility Report on Improvements
to The Meadows Subdivision Plat.
3. Considerationof the Extension of a Variance to Allow the Display of
Pennants - Rolling Wheels, Inc.
4. Consideration of Appointment of Committee Members and Various City
Functinna and Duties.
5. Consideration of Approval of Plans and Specifications and Advertising
for Bids for the Demolition of the Oakwood Building.
6. Consideration of Renewing Contract with YMCA for Detached Worker.
7. Department Head Quarterly Meeting.
8. Approval of Bills - Last Half of December 1980.
9. Approval of Minutes - December 2nd and 6th, 1980 Special Meetings, and
Regular Meeting of December 8, 1980.
Unfinished Business -
New Business -
Is
Council - 1/12/81
AGENDA SUPPLEMENT
1. Consideration of the Award of the Sale of $160,000 General Obligation improve-
ment Bonds of 1981 and $255.000 in General Obligation Bonds of 1981 for Library.
PURPOSE: Bids are to be received Monday night for the sale of bonds to finance
the 1980-1 and 1980-2 Improvement Projects, which served Macarlund Plaza and
Prairie Road. Additionally, there will be a sale of general obligation bonds
to finance the new library.
King Forness, from Springsted, Inc., will be at Monday night's meeting to open
the bids and give his recommendation on the awarding of the sale of these
bonds. In the recommendations of the report previously handed out at the
December 8, 1980 meeting, Springsted, Inc. had estimated that the interest
rate on these two bonds in the area of 8.4%, but since that time, the bond
buyers index has increased, and it is quite likely that the interest rate
will be higher than this.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Separate motions would be in order to approve the awarding
of the sale of the $160,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1981
and the $255,000 in General Obligation Bonds of 1981.
Council Agenda - 1/12/81
2. Consideration of Resolution Ordering Feasibility Report on Improvements to
The Meadows Subdivision Plat.
PURPOSE: To consider a petition filed by Mel Wolters to have sewer, water,
street, curb 6 gutter, and storm sewer improvements to Lots 10 thru 14, of
Block 1, Lots 11 thru 15 of Block 4, and Lots 1 d 2 of Block 5, all in The
Meadows Subdivision Plat.
For your reference, there is enclosed a portion of the subdivision plat
which would contain the area of the improvements requested. You will note
that requests for improvement depicted on the grading plan shown terminates
at the point where the drainage is proposed to go in a northwesterly fashion,
as opposed to southeasterly fashion. According to Mr. Wolters, the reason
for this is he is concerned about the installation of the manholes that
are indicated on the enclosed map. John Badalich will be working these up
separately. Mr. Wolters has indicated that if the cost is in line, he may
consider petitioning for this to be included in the project at a later date.
It should be noted that some of the lots and block numbers have been changed
from the preliminary plat to the final plat, and this is the reason for
the difference from the amp and description stated above.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of the Adoption of a Resolution ordering
our engineer, John Badalich, to prepare a feasibility report on this pro-
posed project.
REFERENCES: Copy of the grading plan, which includes the area of improve-
ments, along with a copy of the proposed resolution.
- 2 -
C
Council Agenda - 1/12/81
3. Consideration of the extension of a Variance to Allow the Display of Pennants -
Rolling Wheels, Inc.
PURPOSE: Consider the variance extension request by Jim Teslow, of Rolling
Wheels, Inc., for an additional two years to allow him to display pennants
which are in fact of a spinner type at his business northeast of the inter-
section of Broadway and Linn Streets in Monticello.
It should be pointed out that Mr. Teslow did indicate that he would not be
asking for another variance extension if this were granted, and the primary
reason he would like to have the variance considered is due to the fact that
the pennants are still in fairly good shape. Furthermore , it should be
pointed out that Monticello Ford, Inc. had flown pennants under a similar
variance until December of 1980, at which time they converted to the
American Flag.
1 feel that the variance extension is reasonable in light of the fact that
Mr. Tcslow has indicated he would not be asking for any further extensions.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of the Extension of a Variance to allow the
display of pennants for Rolling Wheels, Inc. for an additional two years.
Ciil�
Council Agenda - 1/12/81
I_
4, Consideration of Appointment of Committee Members and Various City Functions
and Duties.
PURPOSE: To make annual appointments to committees and appoint the assignment
of various city functions and duties. Except in the case of the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority and the Library Construction Project, all appointments
are on an annual basis. State Statutes require membership to the H.R.A.
Committee to be on a rotating five-year basis, and as you can see by the
enclosed current list of the City of Monticello commissions along With various
other appointments necessary to be made at the first meeting of the year,
Vic Vokaty's term is up January 1, 1981. In the case of the Library Construc-
tion Committee, this Committee is considered an ad hoc, or temporary committee,
whose term basically ceases with its function, which is the recommendation
of design, site layout and space need requirements for a library. Prior to
the opening of the new library, the City Council should appoint a library
board in accordance with State Statutes.
Except for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority appointment, which is
made by the Mayor with the Council's approval, all committee appointments
are made by the City Council on a majority vote. it may be the easiest to
go over the entire list of committees, duties, functions, etc., and obtain
a consensus, then call for a vote on the entire list as amended, rather than
call for a motion on each individual committee function, duty, etc. The
committees themselves appoint the individual chairperson of the committee.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of appointment of City of Monticello committees,
individual committee members, city official function and duties.
REFERENCES; Seo enclosed list.
DI
L
- 4 -
Council Agenda - 1/12/81
5. Consideration of Approval of Plansand Specifications and Advertising for
Bids for the Demolition of the Oakvood Building.
PURPOSE: To consider approval of plans and specifications and advertisement
for bids for the removal of the Oakwood School building.
John Simola, Public Works Director, leas prepared plans and specifications for
this project, and these have been reviewed by both the City Administrator
and John Badolich. These plans and specifications contain approximately
60 pages and are available for review at the Monticello City Hall.
According to the plans and specifications, bids would be returnable
February 9, 1981, at 2:00 P.M., and approved at the Council meeting that
same evening. In the plans and specifications it is indicated that notifica-
tion for removal will come from the City between March 15 and April 1, 1981,
and that the building itself must be removed and the site cleared Within 60
days after notification.
Currently, attempts have been made to try to locate a disposal site, and
two local contractors, Veit Construction Company and Brenteson Construction
Company, have appropriate sites for the disposal of the materials. Both
of these contractors have indicated that they are interested in the project.
ifneither one of these contract ore is successful bidder, there remains the
possibility that the ultimate contract or could work with either one of the
two parties indicated to use the it site as the disposal site, but at a fee.
As a result, attempts are still being made to find another appropriate
disposal site that is not necessarily tied into a contractor. One of the
problems being encountered is ti -int if the site is not in the City Limits,
there becomes a problem with land use. One additional private disposal
site that could be used would be the Yonak landfill in Maple Lake, but of
course, this would be a cost that would be incurred by the contractor on
the project.
According to one contractor, the estimated cost of this project would be
approximately $40,000; however, if the City does not find its own disposal
site for the use of the contractor, this could be increased substantially.
According to the plane and specifications, the contractor will retain all
salvage rights to the materials. Currently, we are trying to salvage any-
thing prior to letting this out on bids that could be used internally by
the various city departments such as the public works, fire department,
senior citizen center. A use has already been made of the carpeting, ceiling
tiles, and other materials, by the City. Anything that cannot be used by
the City departments themselves could be put on an auction which the School
District will have on some of their own items such as desks, furniture and
fi►tures, etc. 1 have sent a proposal to the St. Clo,-d CETA office to
obtain three people at no cost to the City of Monticello to help in salvaging
some of these items. if this proposal goes through, these people could salvage
someof the items and put these on the auction with the School District. However,
if this proposal does not go through, any attempt at salvaging items will
MINC
ri
Council Agenda - 1(12(81
be minimal since the cost incurred by the City will be greater than the
profit realized.
With the City now owning the Dowling house which eventually will be removed to
make way for the Library parking lot, there would be the possibility of
including this item with the bids for the Oakwood School building. However,
there is the possibility that someone may be interested in moving the home
itself to another lot, provided that a variance was granted by the Council
since the building itself is older than 10 years old, and the building was
brought up to code. While this appears unlikely, it may be well to adver—
tise this on a separate basis and see what interest there may be either for
the removal or demolition of this facility. If the Council is not receptive
to granting a variance if it is moved within the City Limits, or there is 1
no interest in moving the facility, the successful bidder on the Oakwood �r
School building could still submit a quote for the demolition of this Y J(A
facility also. Similar to the Oakwood School Building, the City could 1L F
salvage any items that they could use internally prior to demolition.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration orova of plans and specifications if
and advertisement for bids for the demo ttion of the Oakwood Building.
Additionally, it would be well to receive an indication from the Council
if they would be receptive to granting a variance on moving of the Dowling
home within the City Limits if someone should be interested in such a project.
REFERENCES: The plans and specifications on the demolition of the Oakwod
Building are available at the Monticello City Hall.
rk-
- 6 -
Council Agenda - 1/12/81
Z-6. Consideration of Renewing Contract with YMCA for Detached Worker.
10
PURPOSE: The City's current contract with the YMCA for a detached worker
expired December 31, 1980. This contract should be considered for renewal
on a 12 -month basis for 1981.
Since this is a quarterly meeting of the department heads, Mike Melstad, the
assigned detached worker to the Monticello area, will be at Monday night's
meeting.
In the budget for 1981, a projected 13% increase was used, arriving at an
annual figure of $2,825, or approximately $235 per month.
For your information, 1 have supplied a copy of the City's contract for
1980.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of 1981 contract for YMCA detached worker.
REFERENCES: Copy of 1980 contract.
- 7
t
Council Agenda - 1/12/81
7. Department Head Quarterly Meeting.
PURPOSE: Being the first meeting of the first quarter of 1981, on Monday
night's agenda will be the Department Head Quarterly Meeting.
The following Department Heads will be at Monday night's meeting:
Fire Chief - Paul Klein
Wright County Sheriff's Representative - Buddy Gay and/or Don Hozempa
Senior Citizens Director - Karen Hanson
YMCA Detached Worker - Mike Melstad
Public Works Director - John Simola
Building Inspector/Civil Defense Dir. - Loren Klein
City Administrator - Gary Wieber
Among the possible items to be discussed will be the Civil Defense Emergency
Drill of January 7, 1981.
- 8 -
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
Bating: An application has been made to
NEW ISSUES Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
Ln the opinion of Bond Counsel, the Bonds are exempt from taxation by the State of Minnesota
and its subdivisions and municipalities and the interest to be paid on said Bonds is not includable
in the gross income of the recipient for United States or State of Alinnesoto income tax purposes
(other than Minnesota corporate franchise and bank excise taxes measured by net income)
according to present federal and Minnesota laws, regulations, rulings and decisions.
CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
$160,000
GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1981
The Bonds sholl mature February I as follows:
15,000 1983-1990
20,000 1991-1992
Bids shall be for not less than $156,875 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of the
Bonds, and must be accompanied by a certified or cashier's check in the amount of $1,600
payable to the order of the City of Monticello.
The Bonds sholl be general obligations of the City for which it sholl pledge its full faith and
credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes without limit as to rate or amount. In
addition the City shall pledge special assessments against benefited property.
$25S A00
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS OF 1981
The Bonds shall mature February I as follows:
20,000 1984-1985$$35,000 1991
25,000 1986.1987 $40 ,000 1992
30,000 1988-1990
Bids sholl be for not less than $250,000 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of the
Bonds, and must be accompanied by a certified or cashier's check in the amount of $2,550
payable to the order of the City of Monticello.
The Bonds shall be general obligotions of the City for which it shall pledge its full faith and
credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes without limit as to rate or amount.
For Each Issue:
The Bonds shall be doted February 1, 1981 and shall bear interest payable on February 1 and
August 1 of each year, commencing August I, 1981. The Bonds shall not be subject to payment in
advance of their respective stated maturity dates.
Bidders shall specify rates in integral multiples of 5/100 or I/8 of 1%. No rate for a maturity
shall exceed the rote specified for any subsequent maturity by more than 1%. Neither any
individual rate nor the net effective rote for the entire Issue may exceed 12%.
The Bonds are offered subject to the approving legal opinion of Briggs and Morgan Professional
Association of Saint Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota.
No bid wil I be considered which is contingent upon award of both Issues.
SALE DATE AND TIME: January 12, 1981 (Monday) at 7:30 P.M., Central Time
The dote of this Officioi Statement is December 30, 1980.
Further information may be obtained from SPRINGSTED Incorporated, Financial Advisor to the
Issuer, 800 Osborn Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 612/222-4241.
�-
CITY COUNCIL
Expiration
Of Term
Arve A. Grimsmo
Mayor
December 31, 1982
Daniel Blonigen
Council Member
December 31, 1964
Fran Fair
Council Member
December 31, 1982
Kenneth Maus
Council Member
December 31, 1984
Philip White
Council Member
December 31, 1982
--------
-------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Wieber
Administrator
--inted
Appointed
Rick Wolfsteller
Administrative Assistant
Appointed
John Simola
Public Works Director
Appointed
Loren Klein
Building Official
Appointed
Mark Irmiter
Liquor Store Manager
Appointed
City Offices:
Monticello City Hall
250 East Broadway
Monticello, Minnesota 55362
612/295-2711
This Official Statement was prepared an behalf of the Issuer by its Financial
Advisor, SPRINGSTED Incorporated, who will be compensated for its services
solely by the Issuer, which compensation is, in part, contingent upon award of the
Bonds. Unless otherwise indicated, the information contained in this Official
Statement was furnished by the Issuer and was the most current information
available as of the date of this Official Statement.
No dealer, broker, salesman or other person has been authorized by the Issuer to
give any information or to make any representations with respect to the Bonds
other than as contained in this Official Statement and, if given or made, such other
information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized
by the Issuer. Certain information contained herein has been obtained from sources
other than records of the Issuer and is believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed
as to completeness and is not to be construed as a representation of the Issuer. The
information and expressions of opinion herein are subject to change without notice
and neither the delivery of this Official Statement nor any sale mode hereunder
shall under any circumstances create any implication that there las been no change
in the affairs of the Issuer since the date hereof.
References in this Official Statement to laws, rules, regulations, resolutions,
agreements, reports and other documents do not purport to be comprehensive or
rkefinitive. All references to surh documents are qualified in their entirety by
reference to the particular document, the full text of which may contain
qualifications of and exceptions to statements made herein. Where full texts have
not been included as appendices hereto, they will be furnished on request.
cl
OFFICIAL TERMS OF OFFERING
$160,000
CITY OF MCNJTICELLO, MINNESOTA
GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1981
Sealed bids for the Obligations shall be opened by the City Council on Monday, January 12, 1981,
at 7:30 P.M., Central Time, at the City Hall. Consideration of the bids for award of the
Obligations shall immediately follow the opening of bids.
DETAILS OF THE OBLIGATIONS
The Obligations shot! be dated February 1, 1981 and shall bear interest payable on February I and
August 1 of each year, commencing August I, 1981. The Obligations shall be general obligations
of the Issuer for which the Issuer shall pledge its full faith and credit and power to levy direct
general ad valorem taxes. In addition the Issuer shall pledge special assessments against
benefited property. The Obligations sholl be in the denomination of $5,000 in coupon form and
non -registrable. The proceedssholl be used to finance the construction of various improvements
in the City.
The Obligations shall mature February I, in the amounts and years as follows:
$15,000 1983-1990
$20,000 1991-1992
The Obligations shall not be subject to payment in advance of their respective stated maturity
dates.
TYPE OF BID
A sealed bid for not less than $156,875 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of the
Obligations shall be filed with the undersigned prior to the time set for the opening of bids. Also
prior to the tune set for bid opening a certified or cashier's check in the amount of $1,600
payable to the order of the Issuer shall have been filed with the undersigned or SPRINGSTED
Incorporated, the Issuer's Financial Advisor; no bid will be considered for which said check has
not been filed. Said check of the Purchaser shall be retained by the Issuer as liquidated damages
in the event the Purchaser fails to comply with the accepted bid. No bid shall be withdrawn
after the time set for opening bids, unless the meeting of the Issuer scheduled for consideration
of the bids is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date without award of the Obligntions
having been made. Rates offered by Bidders shall be in integral multiples of 5/ 100 or 1/8 of 1%.
No rate for a maturity shall exceed the rate specified for any subsequent maturity by more than
1.0%. No rate nor the net effective rate for the entire Issue of the Obligotions stroll exceed
12.0`16. Obligations of the some maturity shall bear a single rote from the dote of the Obligations
to the date of maturityand additional coupons shall not be used.
AWARD
The Ohligntions shall be awarded to the Bidder offering the lowest dollar interest cost to be-
determined
edetermined by the deduction of the premium, it any, from, or the addition of the discount, if any,
to, the total dollar interest on the Obligations from their date to their final scheduled maturity.
The Issuer's computation of the total net dollar interest cost of each bid, in accordance with
customary practice, shall be controlling.
d'a
The Issuer shall reserve the right to: (i) waive non -substantive informalities of any bid or of
matters relating to the receipt of bids and award of the Obligations, 00 reject all bids without
cause, and, (iii) reject any bid which the Issuer shall determine to have failed to comply with the
terms herein.
PAYING AGENT
The Purchaser may name the Paying Agent but shall do so within two business days after the
award of the Obligations. In the event of failure by the Purchaser to name the Paying Agent
within said time the Issuer shall do so. The Issuer she II pay reasonable and customary charges for
the services of the Paying Agent. An alternate Paying Agent may be named by the Purchaser in
the same manner as the principal Paying Agent is named, provided that there shall be no
additional cost to the Issuer.
CUSIP NUMBERS
If the Obligations qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers shall be printed on the
Obligations, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Obligation nor any error with
respect thereto shall constitute cause for failure or refusal by the Purchaser to accept delivery
of the Obligations. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification
numbers shall be paid by the Purchaser.
SETTLEMENT
Within 40 days following the date of their award the Obligations shall be delivered without cost
to the Purchaser at a place mutually satisfactory to the Issuer and the Purchaser. Delivery shall
be subject to receipt by the Purchaser of on approving legal opinion of Briggs and Morgan
Professional Association of Saint Paul and Minneapol is, Minnesota, which opinion shall be printed
on the Obligations, and of customary closing papers, including a no -litigation certificate. On the
date of settlement payment for the Obligations shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds
which shall be received at the offices of the Issuer or its designee not later than 1:00 P.M.,
Central Time of the day of settlement. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the
Obligations shall have been made impossible by action of the Issuer, or its agents, the Purchaser
shall be liable to the Issuer for any loss suffered by the Issuer by reason of the Purchaser's non-
complionce with said terms for payment.
At settlement the Purchaser shall be furnished with acertificate signed by appropriate off iters
of the Issuer to the effect that the Official Statement prepared for the Obligations (lid not as of
the date of the Official Statement, and does not as at the date of settlement, contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the
statements therein, in light of the circurnstances under which they were made., not misleading.
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
Upon request to the Issuer's l-inancial Advisor prior to the bid opening underwriters may obtain a
copy of the Official Statement. The Purchaser sfnl I be provided with 15 copies and may obtain
additional copies at the Purchaser's cost. Any other interested party may obtain a copy, if
availcble, at a price of five dollars.
Doled December 8, 1980 BY OIROEH OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/s/ Gary Wicher
Adrninistrntor
SCHEDULE OF BOND YEARS
$160,000
CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1981
CUMULATIVE
YEAR PRINCIPAL BOND YEARS BOND YEARS
1983
$15,000
30
30
1984
$15,000
45
75
1985
$15,000
60
135
1986
$15,000
75
210
1987
$15,000
90
300
1988
$15,000
105
405
1989
$15,000
120
525
1990
$15,000
135
660
1991
$20,000
200
860
1992
$20,000
220
1,080
Average Maturity: 6.75 Years
Bonds Dated: February 1, 1981
interest Due; August 1, 1981 and each February I and
August I to maturity.
Principal Due: February 1, 1983-1992 inclusive.
Redemption: None.
-4-
OFFICIAL TERMS OF OFFERING
� S2ss,000
CITY OF MOPRICELLO, MINNESOTA
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS OF 1981
Sealed bids for the Gbligations shall be opened by the City Council on Monday, January 12, 1981,
at 7:30 P.M., Central Time, at the City Holl. Consideration of the bids for award of the
Obligations shall immediately follow the opening of bids.
DETAILS OF THE OBLIGATIONS
The Obligations shall be dated February I, 1981 and shall bear interest payable on February I and
August I of each year, commencing August I, 1981. The Obligations shall be general obligations
of the Issuer for which the Issuer sholl pledge its full faith and credit and power to levy direct
general ad valorem taxes. The Obligations shall be in the denomination of $5,000 in coupon form
and non -registrable. The proceeds shall be used to provide funds for the construction of a library
facility.
The Obligations shall mature February I, in the amounts and years as follows:
$20,000 1984-1985$ 35,000 1991
$$25,000 1986-1987 $40,000 1992
30,000 1988-1990
The Obligations shall not be subject to payment in advance of their respective stated maturity
f dates.
TYPE OF BID
A scaled bid for not less than $250,000 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of the
Obligations shall be filed with the undersigned prior to the time set for the opening of bids. Also
prior to the time set for bid opening a certified or cashier's check in the amount of $2,550
payable to the order of the Issuer shall have been filed with the undersigned or SPRINGSTED
Incorporated, the Issuer's Financial Advisor; no bid will be considered for which said check has
not been filed. Said check of the Purchaser shall be retained by the Issuer as liquidated damages
in the event the Purchaser fails to comply with the accepted bid. No bid shall be withdrawn
after the time set for opening bids, unless the meeting of the Issuer scheduled for consideration
of the bids is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date without award of the Obligations
having been made. Rates offered by0idderssholl be in integral mul tiples of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1%.
No rate for a maturity shall exceed the rate specified for any subsequent maturity by more than
1%. No rate nor the net effective rate for the entire Issue of the Obligations shall exceed 12.0'%,.
Obligations of the same maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Obligations to the
date of maturity and additional coupons shall not be used.
AWARD
The Obligations shall be awarded to ;hF- Bidder ifferin.1 the lowest collar interest cost to be
determined by the deduction of the premium, if any, frorn, or the addition of Ihu discuunt, if any,
to, the total dollar interest on the Obligations from their date to their final scheduled maturity.
The Issuer's computation of the total net dollar interest cost of each bid, in accordance with
customary practice, shall be controlling.
-5-
The Issuer shall reserve the right to: (i) waive non -substantive informalities of any bid or of
matters relating to the receipt of bids and award of the Obligations, (ii) reject all bids without
cause, and, (iii) reject any bid which the Issuer shall determine to have failed to comply with the
terms herein.
PAYING AGENT
The Purchaser may name the Paying Agent but shall do so within two business days after the
award of the Obligations. In the event of failure by the Purchaser to name the Paying Agent
within said time the Issuer shall do so. The Issuer shall pay reasonable and customary charges for
the servicesof the Paying Agent. An alternate Paying Agent may be named by the Purchaser in
the same manner as the principal Paying Agent is named, provided that there shall be no
additional cost to the Issuer.
CUSIP NUMBERS
If the Obligations qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers shall be printed on the
Obligations, but neither the failure to p. int such numbers on any Obligation nor any error with
respect thereto shall constitute cause for failure or refusal by the Purchaser to accept delivery
of the Obligations. The CUSIP ServieeBureou charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification
numbers shall be paid by the Purchaser.
SETTLEMENT
Within 40 days following the date of their award the Obligations shall be delivered without cost
to the Purchaser at a place mutually satisfactory to the Issuer and the Purchaser. Delivery shall
be subject to receipt by the Purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Briggs and Morgan
Professional Association of Saint Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota, which opinion shall be printed
an the Obligations, and of customary closing papers, including ano-litigation certificate. On the
date of settlement payment for the Obligations shall be made in federal, ur equivalent, funds
which shall be received at the offices of the Issuer or its designee not later than 1:00 P.M.,
Central Time of the day of settlement. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the
Obligations shall have been made impossible, by action of the Issuer, or its agents, the Purchaser
shall be liable to the Issuer for any loss suffered by the Issuer by reason of the Purchaser's non-
compliance with said terms for payrnent.
At settlement the Purchaser shall be furnished with a certificate signed by appropriate officers
of the Issuer to the effect that the Official Statement prepared for the Obligations did not as of
the date of the Official Statement, and does not as of the date of settlement, contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary In order to make the
statements therein, in light of the circumstaneesunder which they were made, not misleading.
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
Upon request to the Issuer's Finonc iol Advisor prior to the bid opening underwriters may obtain a
copy of the Official Statement. The Purchaser shall be provided with 15 copies and may obtain
additional copies at the Purchaser's cost. Any other interested party may obtain a cupy, if
available, at a price of fiw. dollars.
Doted December 8, 1980 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/s/ Gary Wleber
Administrator
.6-
Cil
SCHEDULE OF BOND YEARS
$255,000
CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS OF 1981
CUMULATIVE
YEAR PRINCIPAL BOND YEARS BOND YEARS
1984
$20,000
60
60
1985
$20,000
80
140
1986
$25,000
125
265
1987
$25,000
150
415
1988
$30,000
210
625
1989
$30,000
240
865
1190
$30,000
270
1, 135
1991
$35,000
350
1,485
1992
$40,000
440
1,925
12
Average Maturity:
7.55 Years
Bonds Dated:
February 1, 1981
Interest Due:
August 1, 1981 and each February I and
August 1 to maturity.
Principal Due:
February I, 1984-1992 Inclusive.
Redemption:
None.
_7.
PURPOSE AND FINANCING
$160,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1981:
These Bonds are being issued pursuant to Chapters 429 and 475, Minnesota Statutes
for the purpose of financing the City's 1980 improvement projects. Construction is
underway and is expected to be completed by January of 1981. The amount of the
Issue is made up of the following components:
Construction Costs $119,167.50
Contingencies, Fees & Issuance Costs 24,747.50
Capitalized Interest(thru 2-1-82) 12,960.00
Allowance for Discount Bidding 3,125.00
Bond Issue $160,000.00
The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which it will pledge its full
faith and credit and power to levy general ad valorem taxes without limit as to rate
or amount. In addition, the City expects to specially assess $154,715 against
benefited property. Assessment rolls are anticipated to be filed in 1981 for first
collection in 1982 and spread over a ten-year period at an interest rate of
approximately 1.50% higher than the net interest rote received on the Bonds.
$255x000 General Obligation Bonds of 1981:
These Bonds are being issued pursuant to Chapter 475, Minnesota Statutes. City
voters authorized the Bonds on November 4, 1980 by a vote of 749 (yes) to 582 (no).
This authorization allows the City to borrow $250,000 to partially finance the
construction of a new library building. As permitted by law, $5,000 or 2% of the
authorization has been added as an allowance for discount bidding.
The total estimated cost of the library project is expected to be $500,000; the
balance of the funding will come from excess funds accumulated in the City's
Liquor Fund and other available City monies. Construction bids have not been
sought as yet. The contribution of the Liquor Fund will not impair the revenue and
reserve requirement specified in the covenants of the $200,000 Liquor Store
Revenue Bonds of 1976.
The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which its full faith and credit
and power to levy general ad valorem taxes will be pledged. The first tax levy for
debt service will be spread in 1981 for collection In 1982. Based on the 1979
taxable assessed value, the average annual levy for the Issue is estimated to be 1.06
mills, including the mandatory 5%overlevy.
FUTURE FINANCING
The City has no further borrowing plans for at least the next six months.
RATING
An application for a rating of these Issues has been made to Moody's Investors
Service, Inc. ("Moody's"), 99 Church Street, New fork, New York.
If a rating is assigned, it will reflect only the opinion of Moody's. Any explanation
of the significance of the rating may be obtained only from Moody's.
There is no assurance that a rating, if assigned, will continue for any given period
of time, or that such rating will not be revised or withdrawn, if in the judgement
of Moody's, circumstances so warrant. A revision or withdrawal of the rating may
have an adverse effect on the market price of the Bonds.
LITIGATION AND DEFAULT
The City is not aware of any threatened or pending litigation affecting the validity
of these Bonds or the City's ability to meet its financial obligations. Monticello has
never defaulted in its debt service payments.
PENSIONS
Employees of the City are covered by the Public Employees Retirement
Ass-ociation (PERA). Since PERA, is managed by the Stoic of Minncsotc, the City
has no responsibility for its administration.
SUMMARY OF MINNESOTA REAL PROPERTY VALUATION, TAX LEVIES
AND CREDITS AND LEVY LIMITS APPLICABLE TO THE CITY
Valuations (Chapter 273, Minnesoto Statutes)
All real property subject to taxation is required to be listed, and at least one-fourth
of file parcels listed shall be appraised each year with reference to their value on
January 2 preceding the assessment so that each parcel slwll be reappraised at
rnaximum intervals of four years. All real property ber_orning taxable in any year is
listed with reference to its value on January 2 of that year. With some exceptions,
all property is valued at its "Market Value." In estirnoting and determining such
value, the assessor is directed by statute to value each property by itself at such
term or price as he believes the same to be fairly worth in money. Nowevgr, in fill -
years 1975 through 1978 the Market Value used for tax imirposes in most cases was
10 less than the amount determined by the assessor to be the worth of the property;
this was because the increase, of value, if any, pennilted to be included in the
Market Volue for tax purposes was limited to tcn percent of the then current
9-
Market Value of the property, or one-fourth of the total amount of value increase,
whichever was greater. The resulting valuation of the property was referred to as
"Limited Market Value." The remaining difference between the Market Value and
the Limited Market Value was added to the Market Value of the property in the
next succeeding year if the increase was not more than 20 percent. If the increase
was more than 20 percent but no more than 40 percent then ten percent was added
each subsequent year until the remaining amount to be added was less than ten
percent, in which case the amount remaining was added in the next subsequent
year. If the increase was more than 40 percent it was added equally in the three
subsequent years.
In 1979 legislation was enacted which provides that:
"For assessments of property for the purpose of determining taxes to
be levied in 1979, payable in 1980, the assessor, after determining the
value of any property, shall compare the value with that determined
in the preceding assessment... The amount of the increase entered in
the current assessment will not exceed ten percent of the value in the
preceding assessment or one-half of the total amount of the increase
in valuation whichever is greater; the excess, together with any
increase in value which has occurred since the previous assessment
shall be added to the market value of the property which shall be used
for the purpose of determining taxes to be levied in 1980, payable in
1981. In all subsequent assessments all real property shat I be assessed
at its full market value."
("Assessed;' i.e. "Taxable" values shown in this Official Statement have been
calculated on the basis of the Market Value of taxable property determined in
accordance with the foregoing provisions for the establishment of Market Values
based on the formula in effect for the particular year shown.)
Because Market Value may not represent the potential selling price of property, a
calculation has been made herein of what is referred to as "Indicuted Market
Value," determined by division of the Market Value used for the determination of
taxes to be levied in 1979, payable in 1980, by the "Sales Ratio" determined by the
State Equalization Aid Review Committee ("FARC') as being the ratio of the
actual likely selling price of property in a taxing unit to the Market Value used for
determining foxes. Indicated Market Value thus approximates the actual market-
place value of taxable property within a taxing unit, exclusive of non-taxable
property such as attached machinery and equipment and mobile homes.
When property is valued it must be classified as prescribed by statute. The
appropriate statutory classification ratio is then applied to the Market Value of the
property for tax purposes to determine the "Assessed Value" against which taxes
are levied. Major property classes and their assessment ratios for taxes payable in
1980 and 1981 are as follows: (This listing does not Include all classes prescribed by
statute.)
-10-
4
Homestead taxes may be further reduced by adjustment for income of the
taxpayer. The maximum tax credit, including the $650 homestead credit, is $650
for persons under 65 years of age and $850 for persons 65 years of age or older. In
addition, a refund is allowed in an amount equal to 50% of the amount by which the
tax payable exceeds the sum of other refunds and a minimum tax based on income,
however, the combined total of all credits and refunds may not exceed $1,000.
Taxpayers must apply to the State for all credits except the homestead credit. Mill
rates are computed without regard for tax credits, thus the tax paid by an
individual taxpayer may be less Ilion that indicated by a published mill rate.
Per Capita Tax Levy Limits - C Nieral and Special Purposes
The City of Monticello has been exempted from the per capita tax levy limit as
defined in M.S.A. 275.11 by an amendment enGrted by the Minnesota Legislature, in
1978. The amendment to M.S.A. 275.1 I reads as follows:
"A city which has a major electric genernIing foci lit y wiIhin its borders, which is
designed for operation at a capacity of 500 rnego •.watts or mare. and is capable of
producing electrical energy for the fxrrpase of transmission and distribution to a
consumer, shall be exempt from the per capita levy limits set by section 275.1 I.
"This ext 6 uffeclive for taxes levied in 1978 and thereafter, payable in 1979 cued
thereafter."
-II-
Percent Of
Percent Of
Market Value
Market Value
For Tax Purposes-
For Tax Purposes -
Property Classification
Taxes Payable 1980
Taxes Payable 1981
Agricultural Non -homestead
25%
19%
Agricultural Homestead: (1)
First $21 ,400 of Market Value
12%
-
Market Value in Excess of $21,000
25%
-
First $50,000 of Market Value
-
14%
Market Value in Excess of $50,000
-
19%
Residential Homestead: (1)
First $21 ,000 of Market Value
18%
-
Market Value in Excess of $21,000
3096
-
First $25,000 of Market Value
-
16%
Second $25,000 of Market Value
22%
Market Value in Excess of $50,000
-
28%
Residentiol Real Estate - 4 or More Units
40%
38%
Residential Real Estate - 3 or Less Units
32%
28%
All other Real Property (Including Commercial,
Industrial, and Public Utility)
43%
43%
Vacant Land
40 c
40%
(1) The homestead base for both agricultural and residential property was increased for taxes
payable in 1981.
Tax Credits (Chapter 273, Minnesota Statutes)
For taxes payable in 1981 , the total tax
on homestead property is
reduced 58%, or
$650, whichever is the lesser amount.
The reduction is credited directly to the
taxpayer and the State reirnburses the
taxing unit for the amount of the credit,
payable in two equal installments due July
15 and November 15.
Homestead taxes may be further reduced by adjustment for income of the
taxpayer. The maximum tax credit, including the $650 homestead credit, is $650
for persons under 65 years of age and $850 for persons 65 years of age or older. In
addition, a refund is allowed in an amount equal to 50% of the amount by which the
tax payable exceeds the sum of other refunds and a minimum tax based on income,
however, the combined total of all credits and refunds may not exceed $1,000.
Taxpayers must apply to the State for all credits except the homestead credit. Mill
rates are computed without regard for tax credits, thus the tax paid by an
individual taxpayer may be less Ilion that indicated by a published mill rate.
Per Capita Tax Levy Limits - C Nieral and Special Purposes
The City of Monticello has been exempted from the per capita tax levy limit as
defined in M.S.A. 275.11 by an amendment enGrted by the Minnesota Legislature, in
1978. The amendment to M.S.A. 275.1 I reads as follows:
"A city which has a major electric genernIing foci lit y wiIhin its borders, which is
designed for operation at a capacity of 500 rnego •.watts or mare. and is capable of
producing electrical energy for the fxrrpase of transmission and distribution to a
consumer, shall be exempt from the per capita levy limits set by section 275.1 I.
"This ext 6 uffeclive for taxes levied in 1978 and thereafter, payable in 1979 cued
thereafter."
-II-
Tax Levies for General Obligation Bands
(Section 475.61, Minnesota Statutes)
The governing body of any municipality issuing general obligations shall, prior to
delivery of the obligations levy by resolution o direct general ad valorem tax upon
all taxable property in the municipality to be spread upon the tax rolls for each
year of the term of the obligations. The tax levies for all years shall be specified
and such that if collected in full they, together with estimated collections of
special assessments and other revenues pledged for the payment of said obligations,
will produce at least five percent in excess of the a:rwunt needed to meet when due
the principal and interest payments on the obligations. Such resolution shall
irrevocably appropriate the taxes so levied and any special assessments or other
revenues so pledged to the municipality's debt service fund or a special debt service
find or account created for the payment of one or more issues of obligations. The
governing body may, in its discretion, of any time after the obligations have been
authorized, adopt a resolution levying only a portion of such taxes, to be filed,
assessed, extended, collected, and remitted as hereinafter provided, and the
amount or amounts therein levied shall be credited against the tax required to be
levied prior to delivery of the obligations.
The recording officer of the municipality shall file in the office of the county
auditor of each county in which any part of the municipality is located a certified
copy of the resolution, together with full information regarding the obligations for
which the tax is levied. No further action by the municipality is required to
authorize the extension, assessment and collection of the tax, but the
municipality's liability on the obligations is not limited thereto and its governing
body shall levy and cause to be extended, assessed and collected gny additional
taxes found necessary for full payment of the principal and interest. The auditor
shall annually assess and extend upon the tax rolls the amount specified for such
year in the resolution, unless the amount has been reduced as authorized below or,
if the mun;cipality is located in more than one county, the portion thereof which
bears the some ratio to the whole amount as the assessed value of taxable property
in that part of the municipality located in his county bears to the assessed value of
ail taxable property in the municipality.
Tax levies so made and filed shall be irrevocable, except that if the governing body
in any year makes an irrevocable appropriation to the debt service fund of moneys
actually an hand or if there is on hand any excess amount in the debt service fund,
the recording officer may certify to the county auditor the fact and amount
thereof and the auditor shall reduce by the amount so certified the amount
otherwise to be included in the rolls next thereafter prepared.
All such taxes shall be collected and remitted to the municipality by the county
treasurer as other taxes are collected and remitted, and shall be used only for
payment of the obligations on account of which levied or to repay advances from
other funds used for such payments.
-12-
0
_0
0
1979 INDICATED MARKET VALUE OF TAXABLE PROPERTY
5128,909,872*
• Calculated by dividing the County Assessor's limited market value of
$116,405,614 by the EA RC's 1979 sales ratio of 90.3% for the City.
1979 TAXABLE ASSESSED VALUE
$40,194,379
Real Estate:
Taxable
Marked Value
Residential Homestead
$ 4,041,717
10.1%
Non -Residential Homestead
1 , 186,106
3.0%
Agricultural
145,787
0.3%
Commercial/Industrial
39390,51 1
8.4%
Public Utility
30,709,234
76.4%
Personal Property
721,024
1.8%
$40,194,379 100.0%
Note: The estimated 1980 taxable assessed value of the City is $41,883,008
TREND OF VALUES
Limited
Taxable
Marked Value
Assessed Value
1979 $116,405,614
$40,194,379
1978 $109,136,74237
$, 349 , 711
1977 111,279,977
539,909,212
1976 112,312,644
40,353,212
1975 $114,168,779
140 , 502, 196
,VOTE: The growth in the City's tax case is somewhat offset by the mandatory
adjustments for depreciated value of Northern States Power Company's
Monticello nuclear power plant.
TEN OF THE LARGEST TAXPAYERS IN THE CITY
Taxpayer
Northern States Power Company
Rosewood Corporation
Individuals
Joyner Recreation
Cedar Crest Aportments
WrightCo Products
Individual
Delrey Monticello
United Power Association
Monticello Ford
Type, of Business
Utility
Shopping Center
(lest Western Motel
Bowling Alley
Apartments
Egg Processing
Apartments
Perkins Restaurant
Utility
Car Dealership
-13-
1979 Taxable
Assessed Value
$30,758,903
401 , 826
270,375
140,793
129.518
94,473
94.072
85,662
75,633
70.109
$32,121 .364
(80% Of total assessed
value)
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDED CWBT
Principal
Date Original
Final
Outstanding
of Issue Amount
Purpose
Maturity
As of 1 1-2-80
1960 77,000
Street and Sewer
6-1-82
$ 10,000
1960 478,000
Local Improvements
10-1-90
225,000
11-1-11 135,000
G.O. Water Revenue
2-1-87
95,000
II -I-71 110,000
Local Improvements
2-1.88
60,000
9-I-73 83,000
Local Improvements
9-1-88
55,000
6-1-74 162,000
Parking Facility
6-1-89
115,000(2)
8- i -75 175,000
Local Improvements
2-1-92
665,000
8-1-75 130,000
Building
2-1-85
85,000(2)
8-I-76 1 ,300,000
Local Improvements
2-1-93
1,155,000
11-i-77 3,470,000
Local Improvements
2-1-99
3,240,000
II -1-78 1 ,475,000
Local Improvements
2-1-88
1,475,000
9-1-79 1,170,000
Local Improvements
2-1-91
1,170,000
2-1-81 160,000
Local lmprovements(I)
2-1-92
160,000
2-I-81 255,000
Library(I)
2-1-92
255,000(2)
$8,765,000
(1) These ISsttes are being
offered for sale In this Official Statement.
(2) Supported solely by
taxes.
REVENUE BONDED DEBT
The City has outstanding $140,000 of liquor store revenue bands which
have a final
maturity of February I, 1986.
ANNUAL PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS
Including These Issues
General Obligation
Revenue
Debt
Debt
1981
$ 565,000
5 15,000
1982
680,000
20,000
1983
690,000
20,000
1984
730,000
20,000
1985
740,000
20,000
1986
760,000
45,000
1987
770,000
1988
775,000
1989
595,000
1990
590,000
1991
595,000
1992
515,000
1993
385,000
1994
65,000
1995
6S,000
1996
65,000
1997
60,001)
1998
60,000
1999
60.E
$8,765,000(1)
$140,000
(t) 78.7% of thisdobt
will bo retired within ten )Tars.
• 14-
SUMMARY OF DIRECT DEBT
Including These Issues
Less: Sinking Funds Net
Gross Debt and Reserves ( I) Direct Debt
General Obligation Debt $8,765,000 $743,830021 ,170
Revenue Bonded Debt $ 140,000 $ 27,000 113,000
(1) Sinking funds and reserves are as of October 31, 1980 and include money to pay
both principal and interest.
DEBT RATIOS
Net Direct
General Obliaat ion Debt
To 1979 Indicated Market Value 6.22%
Per Capita - Residential Share (1) $261.76
(1) Calculated by rnultiplying the net direct general obligation debt by 10.1%,
which is the residential portion of the 1979 taxable assessed value, and dividing
the product by 3,095, the preliminary 1980 U.S. Census population.
INDIRECT DEBT
Percent
Taxable G.O. Debt Applicable
Amount
Applicable
Taxing 1979
Unit Assessed Value As of 12-31-80 To City( I)
To City
Wright County $224,640,005 None
Debt
ISD 882 (Monticello) $ 53,812,317 $5,905,000 74.7%
$4,411,035
Monticello -Big Lake
1978/79
HospitalDistrict(2) $ 82,282,304 $1,130,000 48.9%
$ 552,570
(1) Percentages represent the ratio of the City's taxable assessed
value to the
total taxable assessed value of the taxing unit shown.
25.01 1 -0-
(2) The hospital district will be issuing approximately $400,000 of gross revenue
bonds In early 1981 for the expansion of ancillary services.
21.778
MILL RATES
-IS-
1979/80
Debt
1976/77
1977/78
1978/79
Total Service
Wright County
22.530
22.971
22.760
25.01 1 -0-
City of Monticello
14.777
21.778
22.971
22.327 10.683
ISD 882 (Non -Ag)
51.497
51.259
52.651
45.493 13.536
Monticello -Big Lake Hosp.
2.521
3.257
1.914
3.263 0.225
Total
91.325
99.265 100.296
96.094 24.444
levies
NOTE: The foregoing mill
rates are
computed on
the basis
of total and
tuiuble assassad valuas, arsd do not reflect
any reduction
for prnlierry rn.r
credits.
-IS-
TAX COLLECTIONS FOR THE CITY
Collected During Collected
Collection Year As Of 6-1-80
Levy/Collect
Amount
Of Levy
Amount
Percent
Amount
Percent
1979/8097,420
191,271
(IN
PROCESS OF
COLLECTION)
113,011
19781797,
9,143
�5196,299
$824,337
$828,102
96.1%
95.3%
$ 824,928
$$ 868,453
9b.2%
99.9%
1977/78
1976/77
(182)
$966
580,348
97.3%
596,083
99.9%
1979/80 State -paid homestead credit: $43,989.40 or 4.9% of total levy.
FUNDS ON HAND
As Of 10-31-80
NOTE: This does not include the second -half tax settlement. Subsequent to
October 31, the City transferred $100,000 from the hfunicipat Liquor Fund
to the General Fund to reimburse that fund for expenses rotated to the
new City library.
ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The City is audited annually by an Independent certified public accounting firm,
from whose reports the data on the following pages has been extracted. The
modified accrual basis of accounting is used. The reader should be aware that the
complete audits may contain additional information relating to the dote presented
Dere, which may interpret, explain or modify it. Copies of the complete audits are
available upon request.
-16-
Cash and Investments
General Fund
$ ( 144,760)
Special Revenue Funds
148,863
Federal Revenue Sharing Fund
191,271
Enterprise Funds:
Sewer
113,011
Water
37,125
Municipal Liquor
270,226
Construction Funds:
1978-2 Construction
(182)
Library Construction
(9,372)
Debt Redemption Funds
743,830
Special Assessment Funds
261,522
Total
$1.611,534
NOTE: This does not include the second -half tax settlement. Subsequent to
October 31, the City transferred $100,000 from the hfunicipat Liquor Fund
to the General Fund to reimburse that fund for expenses rotated to the
new City library.
ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The City is audited annually by an Independent certified public accounting firm,
from whose reports the data on the following pages has been extracted. The
modified accrual basis of accounting is used. The reader should be aware that the
complete audits may contain additional information relating to the dote presented
Dere, which may interpret, explain or modify it. Copies of the complete audits are
available upon request.
-16-
16 a; raw
IM
.. uv
..........
IffCT)
Ga
C.ve W _ rrat r.t..1
el.a. a• . arr.�..aaa..a
V r.r
rr.M H Iw•r. A.s... ..a..
/n/11e tgh..tw,..
� y1 n .1 b)1•'lo rnb�.. of fr.
1 .�. t• . wIM IOr ..t.r�r 1r eWa
u.mmn
r.Ia
r..lA.. •.�eq..It.
L..I uanuo.
e`•I.•A•r1r.1 fw.1 rlaa.
en1•ti .ra.. A.
DILL aIn1ISl ltp •rm Ipo.n
nCCT0.1 GrW.3 _ _
Sl.a 1.1 0.N r•r 1.1 II .e ' - ...
C.wtnl I..a�a Ir1.Al1= Croat __ _ � �1•_ S.•_!_ ____ 0..__ _ IOIaI __
1 i/.Ilp 1 11r,M) I rr),111 1 ,111 Ir, nl.elr I 111.5.1 1 1)11 Il. nnf n.)
]-lrl
r.Jf, r. fol n• n. au n.nl
i.Ito 1.1" t,n1 i�aei
l.enr.l•1 I n n,wn 1.f.+ e.r
n,y),In I,vw,n1
I s.w rf.•rn I lr..vr
t.,.)f 11,105
•. re! .1!• .eb
).1I1 5.)11
m r,5o1 I ).ern r m.fos nal 1.!01.!11
u,nl r n.1 e• .,oe r
III.OM Iro.te Iv_I!�_� m
i�t8 iTl� � .e.l:e i., n..ow i ro len Ir,)i5,r•n i .-'li,
In,Pe
0.1% )P.AI I,yLIIJ 1. Pn l,e U,Ifi 1 1)Ae0 e.lro!11
1 Ir) II J�y1 1I II,OIf,00r I O,�ll IT, )i l�!)f II, IfIy�f I Ji__Oe0 �.� nO1 �1lf�ow 1]11_1 lu lu+
40
I",
.... .....
N.600
Ia,600
Ile
M.M
.."M
. .........
b. 116
'N':
to.—
LL
L-.a"U LAWI=
&--ALJU
CITY Of sGITIM1.0
COMIIED STAtE.'LRj Of REVMLS. EXPENDITURES &1D CIIA%CES IN FU:M BALAnCE
ALL GOt'ER?TENTAL TYPES
For The Year Envied December 31, 1979
Special
Otbi
Special
Revenue
Revrnue ■
General
Rev
Redcaption
Construction
Aasessaent
Sharing
Tata)
ra.es av] penat:r es
Speei
1 a D,3<3
} 267,053
S 431,tt0
S 616,566
aj a AS
Lie—'.. .tees.
;1,)25.940
1.):5.940
petVits
tattrgave
26.ae4
28.486
rrxataI re tales
111.755
2].203
15.860
5,362
S 9t .000
267,191
Char£ea !or xtrviet aYe
23,2£6
16.7:9
39.627
FirKs
1,101
int ere at
1,915
25.5)7
55,601
S 1.706
207.502
4,td4
2$2.968
Re iebvr sraa'nU far adalni st r.ti ve costa
1).616
8,BC6
26.266
52,712
Pott Re.trse sub-dsviaian rcz lrr-_cnt
2.941
Other
4,£59
4,912
2,941
Total ae.—.
f 730,315
1 368,89
; 442.6]3
S 27,994
}3,935,104
f 95,168
S3.240.303
d:her Sovrrea
tranAT—
42.94)
17,119
360
60.669
Debt rcti .- ean.ribation
1,625,616
1.825.618
fiord ProccrdA
62,2]4
1.091,479
1.113,)13
Total geee.-eye and Other Soare6s
S 330.375
1 sU ,81!i
52.408,002
i 27,994
53,026,583
1 45.528
}5,300,301
£.Fendi tures
CT—t
s trrer:t GOvtrG'LOL
} 163,432
S 163.432
Po'I ie et'
Police, ci it defeat and ♦.tool eo t—I
110.)70
,
310.730
fart
1 26,309
24.304
tl.intepanee-Sainte—e Buijding
11.437
11.43]
-Streets
123,736
123,734
-Oiaeased Tree
13,052
13.062
Santis clan
35,945
35,945
C9lt-ar.l and Ree rcation - Library
1,764
3.764
- Srniw Citize"•
- Ct imrty School
9,20
7,00D
9,250
3.000
- PZ
O,596
20,596
Pl arcrag aM 2 ing
3,136
2,536
5.676
orderly immuti0n
646
1,172
t.97a
' ""�""• deli"'`"`
[�pwai mass
t 20,675
10.895
Debt Rrdeagtimi
3 '
Principal
S 185,000
185,000
t nt ,rest a:d paying charges
Sf 4,690
7,343
192.013
Tot.I £.p-rdito tea
f 3.5,595
i 319,610
i 569.690
% 28.218
Si,:b3,314
Other Usta
T-"%1era
360
.2,990
17.319
60.669
C.Vlrted eatat—tiem projects
1 29.992
4.[06.5)2
4.436.564
Debt retlrvr_tat eon:ritwiicn
1.625.561
1,825,561
r. -I Lspea3i tures ami OWrr U.es
S 3.$,956
i 365.600
3 569.690
s 29.992
}5.277,690
3 -O-
}7.586.128
Ereesa IOeficr eney3 or RGverarea sed
OL er S—, a r E.peditures and Other Uses
S {tS.5D2)
i -9,019
11.636.312
S 41,998)
313,251,:07)
S 95,528
91,285,827)
9egimlrg esappropria`ed Surd Galante
69,566
254,2<a
1.959.173
2,346
3.952.381
22,989
6,260.723
Dee—Y. 11-Te11) in app-pr,a-d f..d
War-
(2.8561
307
478,549
(89.00Oi
38:.000
t-01'Yr CNAtf PDPR Ia;E4 TUID -LANCE
f 54,005
S 300,413
13`!)97,. e5
S 555
51,179,621
3 29.'.37
S5.3nt,+9n
uwwras
.s•,rmn o
awr.,)
IN IUNP Da1.ANf.1
fol
Iat IF—,•t,.arA^Or"—,•
11, .OTe
$prr 1.1
P.bl
er•11.1
ae.•wu.
Cr_si -_
6.. __- __
6r6.yliba,
Canst_tt ion
ALttttN[Nt
Sha,_{ng"�-_
/Ot al,_-_--
i:•�a •wa re..ls lrs
f pl,Olp
3 711, tii
/ u0,1>n
1 Ige.env
,•; � �
105
i ai4, le.
447,6eb
f,...a...•t...........
le.ele
76.e1n
._•..•a
.,,.Ia)
71,19.
11,101
141..19
i A..",
Mb. It9
[tu1l.a•1 e. Y•r•Ir.Y
Il,paa
I,lv.
>a,a 14
t...a
/, 11p
1.1•,0
to r•.al
9,/7v
70.101
S tag
141,6111
1,615
770,1 to
•1w.�r.•�.1a Iwr •ilwl a.r•1 .r• •
71, nrr
la,p%+
5141
ra•,.. sd-al:.•.N r v.i rr�.r
4,))4
4,114
•N y,a
Ip)
1:9P1
_
—
- -_119
_-I,f81I
i,p70
iw: •i 9r..w..
{ }D 1, 194
_
1 1/9, /li
/ ..11;11...
/
/ 1110, 714
j—�I), 1.«1
1).iill,l.�1
• Sw1••a
"—
1 IOI.NM16
) 1111 .N4a
4w<,..
{ a1i,vl6
4
174,4 i6
n1,
• ,•.w•,
t.wa ;ear.•ta
,vvr
rlvu,•rar
__
,91rr
Iw, vl I. w. w.r .w1 O, l.• Sm.r••
�, 71.196
1„—iiV, 109
1]i,Ka�(,l0
S �tO1�ii
jl,i«�.I I4
15,0..0
4t.i 04,6..'0
.•. .•1 w1...• ...... w.1 .......
a1,d.0
61,P49
e t.r
s •,7+4
W ,.r.w..r• • M.lalq
9,7P1
•,
.NI .M111
5.w 11u..w
11,119
•I,t.v
/sl, r,.i ..d !.•0064 f4w - /16, 4r}
1,a J6
1,414
Srw1.1 Ci. I.—
9,i;U
9,;".
C.r�wwl•Y S,.ssl
7..l1
1.47)
YIw.w1.I •wd lwl.a
1, 1)}
7,111
), lAv
1 .fM•
1 ,1191
.•• a�w1a 4•r r�1y a•I•.q...s
f a,I Y
6,.01
9,7P.
P.l•lrra•.�. Ir.
_
1 o),Ign
9),aNl
-+r•..r .. r.. •.9 •a.
lar. ua
},eco
19!,777
I4..IN1•ry.an., ..ar
i-7«s;.ia
ii64.31i
Mir:: i::a
.1,1n.
n1
{ ,•.an
.
mi
1 60,01.
a)4.nn
1.i�i 1.
.... .•r ...__.......... •..r
_ _ _
_
376 4}a
571,9}6
..... t r+ ,•.••. .•• o. «•. ....
i "_._. __
1._."_. _ _
_
t. r.
{.. _-•ein
}_,i=).ao�
_
1 __ii
ii-Si«,iei
... �.. ..a •N rs. Serr...
t ii, 166
1 ale ,(AI
S 660,4Y+
10}11,14}}
1;,{}57.179
4 "Itze
11,1)6,061
W r. .. •
•rprarr`a.
al,v+a•
..K,.I)
I.Ha,U).
699
1,100.611
1.119/,764
I•.'�..v
r•sar i•. Frr�t•t. ra
...a b.1...,
10.4%1
__IrV,.lal
_-• --
.—_1),661
16.0,6»r
#eta
_QV12ea)
..•rrmr.. • n a
,m9 a•. •1N!
f 4v•)sa
�.-10:1:��
IIC??, U,
I...e._Att.
I:19)]l U
1 ]..,, I..e•9tl0
i�'Dii:l�«7
LIT Y OF MONTICELLO
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES
PROPR IETARY FUND TYPES
For The Year Ended December 31, 1979
Other Revenue (Expenses)
Property taxes and
homestead credit
Interest
U.C. Fund reimbursement
Bond interest.
Cash over (short)
Depreciation -contributed
assets (73 ,427) (73,772)
$ (54,266) S (71,078) S 6,551
NET INCOME (LASS) S (92 ,689) S (66,293) S 64,689
•22-
S 11 ,548 S 100
7 ,613 2,594
I
fn
Liquor
Fund Total
$ 682,019 E 682,019
542,357 542,357
$ 139,662 $ 139,662
144,090
118,884
E 139,662 E 402,636
E 43 , 755
7,386
2 .972
1,105
7 .971
1 .500
14.310
7
10
1 ,864
644
S 81 .524
S 58,138
S 17,275
(35)
(10,692)
3
E 98,375
20,246
31,326
18,987
167,069
445 '
2,876
14,110
1,025
4,223
1,500
14,310
137
10
1,864
1,623
S 378,126
S 24,510
E Il,eae
27,482
(35)
(10,592)
3
(147,199) id
S (118,793)
S (94,283)
Sewer
Nater
Fund
Fund
Sales and Cost of Sales
Sales
Cost of Sales
Gross Profit
Operating Revenues
PCA and EPA reimbursements
E 144, 090
Collections, connections,
inspection fees and other
operating revenue
68. 569
E
50,315
Total Gross Profit
and Operating
Revenues
E 212.659
E
50,315
Operating Expenses
Salaries and employee
benefits
E 36.882
E
17,738
Utilities and telephone
6 , 412
6,448
Supplies and materials
13.809
14,545
Repairs and maintenance
15.577
2,305
Engineering fees
166.069
1,000
Laundry
298
147
Testing
2 . 876
Depreciation-acqui red
assets
4 .679
1,460
Travel and conferenceo
645
380
Trenching and hookups
2 .848
1,375
Audit expense
Insurance
Legal and professional
fees
130
NSF checks
Adverti sing
Mi seel l aneous
857
122
S 251 ,082
S
45,520
S (38 ,423)
S
4,795
Other Revenue (Expenses)
Property taxes and
homestead credit
Interest
U.C. Fund reimbursement
Bond interest.
Cash over (short)
Depreciation -contributed
assets (73 ,427) (73,772)
$ (54,266) S (71,078) S 6,551
NET INCOME (LASS) S (92 ,689) S (66,293) S 64,689
•22-
S 11 ,548 S 100
7 ,613 2,594
I
fn
Liquor
Fund Total
$ 682,019 E 682,019
542,357 542,357
$ 139,662 $ 139,662
144,090
118,884
E 139,662 E 402,636
E 43 , 755
7,386
2 .972
1,105
7 .971
1 .500
14.310
7
10
1 ,864
644
S 81 .524
S 58,138
S 17,275
(35)
(10,692)
3
E 98,375
20,246
31,326
18,987
167,069
445 '
2,876
14,110
1,025
4,223
1,500
14,310
137
10
1,864
1,623
S 378,126
S 24,510
E Il,eae
27,482
(35)
(10,592)
3
(147,199) id
S (118,793)
S (94,283)
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES
PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES
For The
Year Ended December 31, 1978
Sever
Water
Liquor
Fund
Fund
Fund
Total
Sales and Cost of Sales
Sales
$ 601,746
f
601,746
Cost of Sales
477,749
477,749
Gross Profit
f 123,997
S
123,997
Operating Revenues
Collections, connections,
inspection fees and other
operating revenue
3 68,126
$ 4►, 945
118,071
Total Cross Profit
and Operating
Revenues
$ 68,126
$ 49,945
$ 123,997
$
242,068
Operating Expenses
Salaries and employee
benefits
$ 23,124
f 19,461
$ 38,385
$
81,070
Utilities and telephone
6,348
6,556
6,251
19,155
Supplies and materials
5,094
11,334
1,908
18,336
Repairs and maintenance
5,015
6,753
492
12,260
Engineering fees
1,184
352
1,536
Laundry
196
161
357
Testing
2,474
2,474
Depreciation - acquired assets
3,014
1,327
7,547
11,888
Travel and conferences
105
75
180
Trenching and hookups
530
260
790
Audit expense
1,230
I, 230
Insurance
10,879
10,879
Legal and professional fees
767
767
NSF checks
148
148
Advertising
1,385
1,385
Miscellaneous
58
605
634
1,297
$ 47,242
f 46,884
3 69,626
$
163,752
S 20,884
$ 3,061
1 54,371
3
78,316
Other Revenue (Expenses)
Property taxes and homestead
credit
26,428
5,497
31,925
Interest
2,898
1.293
8,396
12,587
U.C. Fund reimbursement
(991)
(991)
Bond interest
(11,629)
(11,629)
Cash over (short)
(5)
(5)
Depreciation - contributed
assets
(54,978)554,611)
(109,589)
{ (25,652)
f (47,821)
1 (4,229)
$
(77,702)
NET INCOME (LOSS)
1 (4„768)
f (44,760)
f 50,142
S
614
-23-
STATEMENT OF REVENUES. EXPENDITURES AND CHANCES IN FUND BALANCE
C[N ERAL POND
Fox Tba Tne [ndc0 Wud•r 37. 797E
Re_^
G•mr•1 prop•rar a,. ac
Hoc•f[.ad cf•dlt
L 10.23111, tq• and 'yc rmft0
/lnu and POM Iain
A-1 imp ... 6m,nt Ices
Int•reav [at Pauenu.
Local 8eu•rnment Otd
Mashtn.r7 aid
Ana 1•r•s.•41on Ild
Pei l<. aid
ARricoicur. •td
r.d.w aa-arport u„er
PCA ,nd LM tactticfa, grant
D.pmar r+g tlt nr la..
oin.r Incm�
Int c incaer
saaoe Invpua .na .9mlpn.n[
Mt•cettan•oua sn<we
Mlm6ut•O m.nt• for •dvini •tr,a ton
cora.
Teta! R...ave
[:p,,,d t:m
CHT c ncfi
[I.c[lon ,'.pen
Admiatftt,[ton
Salt/•f
tmvlore• e.n.cat•
T. t,ph...
SVPPIIa• Ind P06-90
Cnnf,r0 nc, and trav,!
9.p,ir• •nd mint an,ncc � .9utyna..t
Printt 236 Ind publiah`n8
Sub•cripttmna, quer nd Ot Aar
Oa Mr
tavn.l omt.r
AI00Ia6r
Auan 1..
In•ut,nc:
Cn
L.Rl 23!51/g 100•
RaI laa•
latle,na tn•p.catmn
nunlc,val 6w,alae m1 ... n,nc.
cacao!!..
C1•MtN
Oa M1rr
lotto, pr,t•ca t.a
Clvll dr 1123!5
Anl m.l control
Dm6 patrol
Bupp1'..
OCMr
01,P*
cons root ten
S,nitll lon COntt•ea
Llbo y Cent oat
i.nlOf cllll, n.
0,!23123 .na ,rOp lor.. e. n.t cal
oanar
C,pu al oua 1,5
It4nn5nR ,+M ,nBoni 238
D.Pun rglnnt
8,161 U• d rwp loy00 b•n•Itl1
0123.1
Ann..a ton cool
Cmaunttr Ir neo?
Otn.t nnuli,n,ou•
tsi •1 Irp.nelt car,•
tiCEBS 0ENEAUts
8y tnnlnB une00toprlu•6 lona e,lewe• '
D.tt eaM appCmpxtat 06 Tuna b,1,M,
INDINO UMAPPROPIIATCD FUND BALANCE
-24.
1978
1976
1977
8ud0..t
Actual
A—.1
i 16.000
i 97,0fe
t 77,410
7,990
7,990
7,770
Is,"
500
78.615
78,313
1,700
3.3Se
7,901
400
3,796
1.146
17).675
99.0)5
119,59)
3.580
4,070
7,)17
4,891
e,D83
716
41757
7.700
3,417
97,,'30
8,000
t4, 04a
7,519
300
430
16e
151
425
bit
11
37,100
10.023
6 743,490
3 283.196
3 )54,793
7 4,050
J 3,578
J 2.820.
900
933
45,55p
47,437
47,590
9,050
9,}1)
1.)00
3,000
1,171
1.476
Lee'
x,579
1.315
760
1.736
350
305
379
1,510
4,140
1.450
1,201
1.190
'00
Ito
367
7.000
7,41,
700
5.115
4,635
4.966
3.650
5,)00
).300
71,130
11.880
15.1'0
,.ODD
1.759
108,164
4.000
1,I /6
1,103
5.300
1s.901
it.3as
4.710
s, 158
1.844
I.t5p
i,afl
t, Sf6
3.400
1,971
SW
53,240
60,046
48,430
175
1,07/
1,090
4.056
3.567
2,374
503
414
7,370
136
7, 346
76.100
31,339
27.145
1.100
1.476
900
II,OH
6.481
6.443
1.449
7,778
46,966
4.400
),557
11,41)
10.600
4,596
6.074
403
156
914
),155
7.475
J.4 t5
7,200
i m 1700
1 f
U6
1 766.110
1 )51,251
1 13.1eb I 13%4bo)
41,950
X0.450
6 66,566
u
P�
®J
'l
STATTJ6NT O2 RgVUNES. EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN I= BALA13C9
GENL/IAL IU"
►of The gear Ended December 31. 1979
1979
1979
1979
Budget
Actual
Actual
Ravew.
GmenI property lues
f 121,700
f 142,97E
g 10,010
Licenses, fees And permit•
2],000
39,410
311, els
tirws and Dtnalt.<s
3.000
•.101
An im.l impoundsent fee.
2.200
3,716
1.796
Int. rgovern.ental Revenue
Local gayer -t sed
it9.lE!
116.171
19.035
Maehi nery aid
].190
3•776
],360
Anti -recession .id
2,]I7
Police cid
7.280
Federal .id-.iryort stud)
4.2a]
PC. .rd CPA hcllities grant
3.4 1
Deputy rep.tnr rias
15.000
19.740
14,040
Other i
Interest income
200
1.919
5.19 oI supplies and equipment
I!0
217
160
ml. eellsnewa incoee
100
..919
017
Reimburmt Nnts for administration
casts
13,1011
17,616
11.700
Total Revenue
a 305,575
"30,3,5
9 213•296
E,pend i to rem
City c- 11
f 7,100
f 6.851
11 3.521
91.eti on ..p -o
9]]
Administration
5.1arire
53.425
]0,11]
47, U7
Employ .• benefits
10,125
7,11E
9.x15
T.lephano
7,100
3,0.1
3.241
Supp! in and pcataRa
4,100
5,010
3,664
Conte renes and travel
1.000
1,809
780
Re p.i nand 0alnlenen<a•eq: ipsenl
150
!00
305
nt3y.M Dubli.hing
4.200
9,177
4,141
9sc rips ions• duos and other
1.600
1,179
1,301
Othtr
175
112
110
C.pl tat outl4y
1,900
I,ON
2,4]1
......or
0.050
9,717
4.031
Audit fat
5,100
5,100
0•]00
ln.ur:ncs
41.000
21,1.3
21,690
[nglneairl ng ....
A. ue
3.7u
Legal fu.
7.]71
2.114
tuilding Inspection
19,050
21.422
15.901
municipal building s..nt.n.ne.
Utilill..
5,910
Clesnny
2,110
3,111
4,971
2.110
4,.70
1 •922
Polic• pratecllon
06.0!0
70.016
60.048
Civil d.f....
1.175
190
1,077
5ir•no
11.110
.niul control
Dog patrol
3.350
4.105
3.161
Supplio
625
169
593
OtNr
1.125
7,119
2.170
Dug pad construction
1.146
5-1 tot! an cant ncl
]l, 775
3:.115
11.1]9
Llbr.ry cool noel
1.710
1,104
1,478
Senior Clti..ns
ea7 Brio .d rapt oy- ban•fite
/,150
7,021
6•:111
Otho r
1,7:0
1.326
4...9
Capi aril.^
1.000
t
P l ann1.2 and s Ing
2..00
l.Ue
].112
D.puty tglstr.1
sal. rio and sap: o�aa ber:elits
la,
10.90]
9th. r
7"
750
110
M
10)
Armee. tion a
:ee
C -..ay school
3.000
3.000
2..!]
Tran.r.r
1.000
390
171
Total T.p•ndlluna
9 303,515
IICESS REVENUES 01 IEIPENDITUIUI
6 215,1111
1 17,191
e.g.nning unappropriated fund balance
61,090
INOINO UNAPPROPIIITED FUND I.L.1C1
1 51.005
-25-
GEOGRAPHY AND DEMOGRAPHY
Location: In northern Wright County, approximately 45 miles northwest
of the Minneapolis/Saint Paul metropolitan area.
Area: 2,750 acres
Population: 3,095 - Preliminary 1980 U.S. Census
1,636 - 1970 U.S. Census
1,477 - 1960 U.S. Census
ECONOMY
The City of Monticello is situated on the Mississippi River approximately halfway
between the Twin Cities and St. Cloud. The Twin Cities -St. Cloud corridor is one
of the fastest growing areas in the State. Monticello itself has experienced an 89%
increase in population between 1970 and 1980.
While the City has grown in population, the largest portion of the tax base is still
provided by Northern States Power Company's Monticello nuclear power plant.
NSP's current taxable assessed value is $30,758,903. The value accounts for
approximately 77% of the City's total taxable assessed value. The NSP plant,
which began operations in 1971, has a net generating capacity of 580 megawatts
and is part of the utility company's interconnecting electrical generating system
serving four states. Approximately 117 persons are employed by NSP at the
Monticello plant.
Some of the larger employers in the City are:
Firm Product/Business Employment
Monticello -Big Lake Hospital and
Nursing Home Medical care 217
Independent School District 882 Public education 202
Northern States Power Company Utility 117
WrightCo Products, Inc. Egg processing 108
Perkins Cake 'N Steak Restaurant 80
Decorative Services Custom draperies 65
Country Kitchen Restaurant 60
McDonald's Restaurant 60
Monticello's Oakwood Industrial Park is located on the southeast side of the City
with easy access to Interstate Highway 1-94. There are currently nine tenants in
the park.
In addition to the downtown shopping area, the 44,000 square foot Monticello Moll
Is located at the interchange of Interstate Highway 1-94 and U.S. 25. There are 13
tenants In the enclosed mall including a Red Owl supermarket aid a Snyders Drug
Store.
-26-
The Wright County State Bank which completed a 10,000 square -foot addition in
1980, reported total deposits as of December 31, 1979 of $23,743,000, a 15%
increase over deposits of a year earlier.
The following summary of building permits illustrates the City's growth over the
past six years:
Total Total New Home New Home
Year Permits Valuation Permits Only Valuation
1980(thru 12/15) 69 ,664,000(1) 34 1,375,000
1979 102 3,928,500 55 1,911,500
1978 134 3,423,200 33 1,467,873
1977 107 ,123,640 28 1,122,044
1976 89 3,418,729 31 1,119,162
1975 74 $1,910,975 15 492,300
(1) Includes $4.5 million for Ute City's sewage treatment plant.
Recent Development:
In 1980 Clow Stamping Company, Inc. of Minneapolis constructed a $1 million
manufacturing facility in Monticello's Oakwood Industrial Pork. The company
makes sheet metal products and employs 46 people at its new plant.
Bondhus Tool Co., a tool manufacturer, completed a 6,000 square -foot addition to
its existing 10,000 sgvare-foot plant at a cost of $120,000 in 1980. The firm
employs 35 people.
Best -in -Webb, Inc., high automated printers, recently added o 2,500 square -foot
warehouse to its 5,000 square -foot building in the Oakwood Industrial Park. The
cost of the addition was $65,000.
Construction an a four -building, 50 -unit apartment complex hos recently started in
the City. The building permit value of the complex is $946,000.
Medical:
Medical facilities in Monticello include the 39 -bed Monticello -Big lake Community
Hospital and the 74 -bed Monticello Nursing Home, both operated by the Monticello -
Big lake Community Hospital District. The District has applied for a Certificate
of Need in order to remodel some ancillary services, construct parking facilities,
and purchase equipment to accommodate the construction, by a private developer,
of a new specialty clinic adjacent to the hospital. The District intends to issue
approximately $400,000 of gross revenue bonds in early 1981 to finance this.
PLQM-IC UTILITIES
water;
In 1976 the City issuer! $1,300,000 General Obligation Improvement Bolds for the
-27-
purpose of improving and expanding its water system. Including these
improvements, the system has a pumping capacity of 2,400 gallons per minute and a
storage capacity of 900,000 gallons. Average demand is approximately 250 gallons
per minute.
Sewer:
The City's present sewage treatment plant has a capacity of 450,000 gallons per
day with an average demand of 400,000 gallons per day. The City is in the process
of upgrading its treatment facilities with a major addition to its treatment plant
and a new interceptor. Construction bids have been awarded and construction has
begun on the interceptor portion of the project. Total costs will be $5,088,000 with
90% funding from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency. The City does not expect to have to borrow for its local
share of the treatment plant, but will finance it from allocated federal revenue
sharing funds. Construction will be completed in the spring of 1982. The new plant
will have a treatment capacity of 910,000 gallons per day.
Electricity: Northern States Power Company
Naturol Gas: North Central Public Service Company
Telephone: Bridgewater Telephone Company
GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION AND SERVICES
The City of Monticello has been a municipal corporation since 1856 and became a
statutory city as of January I, 1974. The City is governed by a council -
administrator form of government. The City Council consists of the Mayor, who
serves a two-year term of office, and four Council members, who serve four-year
overlapping terms. All Council members are elected at large from the City. The
City Administrator, appointed by the Council, is responsible for the daily affairs of
the City.
Monticello's City Hall was completed in January, 1978, at a total cost of $4,60,000
including land. The City Hall was financed with reserve funds and did not require
bonding. Included in the facility are Council chambers and administrative offices.
The City also owns and operates a fire hall, maintenance building, Monticello
Senior Citizens Center, Monticello Historical and Information Center and four
parks. The $255,000 General Obligation Bonds of 1981 being offered for sale in this
Official Statement will partially finance the construction of a City -owned new
library.
The City sold its "on -sale" municipal liquor store in 1975 and constructed on "off -
sold' liquor store adjacent to the Monticello Mall in 1976. The building was
financed by the issuance of $200,000 in liquor revenue bonds.
Police protection for the City is provided by the Wright County Sheriff's
Department. The City's Fire Department is staffed with 29 trained volunteers.
-28-
EDUCATION
Independent School District 882 (Monticello) has an approximate enrollment of
2,300 students in grodes kindergarten through twelve and employs 202 certified and
auxiliary personnel.
One elementary school and a junior -senior high school comprise the physical plant.
In 1976, the District issued $2,750,000 in building bonds to finance the construction
of a 28 -room addition to the elementary school and a physical education complex.
-29-
CERTIFICATION
As of the date of the settlement of these Bonds, the Purchaser will be furnished
with the following certificate:
Certificate
As of the date of the Official Statement, Gecember 30, 1980,
prepared for the issuance of the City's $160,000 General Obligation
Improvement Bonds of 1981 and $255,000 General Obligation Bonds of
1981, it did not and does not as of the date of this Certificate contain
any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary in order to make the statements made therein, In tight
of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
Witness our hands this day of , 1981.
FOR THE CITY OF MONTICE11_1.0, MINNESOTA
Arve A. t,rimsmo, Mayor
t,ary rt, wieber, Administrator
.30.
OFFICIAL 131D 17ORM
TO: Gary Wieber, Administrator DATE: January 12, 1981
City Hall
250 East Broadway
Monticello, Minnesota 55362
RE: $255,000 General Obf igotion Bonds of 1981
For the Bonds of this Issue which shod mature and bear interest at the annual rate, as follows, we
offer a price of $ and accrued interest to the date of delivery.
% 1984 1988
* 1985 % 1989
* 1986 % 1990
% 1987 % 1991
% 1992
In making this offer we accept all of the terms and conditions of the Official Terms of Offering
published in the Official Stotement for the Issue dated December 30 1980 . In the event of
failure to deliver these fan s� in accordance with the Official Terms or Offering as printed in the
Official Statement and mode o part hereof, we reserve the right to withdraw our offer,
wreupon Fe-
eeposit accompanying it will be immediately returned. All blank spaces of this
offer are intentional and are not to be construed as an omission.
Account Members
ME
Account Manager
-_------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not as o part of our offer, the above quoted prices being controlling, but only as on aid for the
verification of the offer, we have made the following computations:
NET INIEREST COST $ Received good faith check
for return to bidder as of
NET EFFECTI VE RA'f E % the date of this offer.
SPIIINGSTED Incorporated by
.....................................................................................
The foregoing offer is hereby accepted by the Issuer on the date of the offer by its following
officers duty authorized and empowered to make such acceptance.
Administrator Mayor
j OFFICIAL BID FORM
T0: Gory Wieber, Administrator DATE: January 12, 1981
City Holl
250 East Broadway
i Monticello, Minnesota 55362
,I
RE: $255,000 General Obligation Bonds of 1981
I'
For the Bonds of this IsstJe which shall mature and bear interest at the annual rate, as follows, we
offer a price of $ and accrued interest to the date of delivery.
1; % 1984 % 1988
} % 1985 % 1989
s % 1986 % 1990
% 1987 % 1991
�i
' % 1992
In making this offer we accept all of the terms and conditions of the Official Terms of Offering
published in the Official Statement for the fssue dated December 30 1980 . Inthe event of
failure to deliver 3o sr inaccordance with the Official Terms o�Offering as printed in the
Official Statement and made a part hereof, we reserve the right to withdraw our offer,
where cn f i deposit accompanying it will be immediately returned. All blank spaces of this
offer are intentional and are not to be construed as an omission.
Account Members
I
a
Account Manager
BY:
CJ
----------------------------------------------•--------------•-------- -----------
Not as a part of our offer, the above quoted prices being controlling, but only as on aid for the
verification of the offer, we have made the following computations:
NET INTEREST COST S Received good faith check
for return to bidder as of
NET EFFECTIVE RATE % the date of this offer.
SPRINGSTEO Incorporated by
_................................
The foregoing offer *i s hereby r�cccpted by the Issuer m the dote al the offer by its IofIowing
officers duty authorized aid empowered to rnoke such occep lance.
Administrator Mayor
j OFFICIAL BID FORM
T0: Gory Wieber, Administrator DATE: January 12, 1981
City Holl
250 East Broadway
i Monticello, Minnesota 55362
,I
RE: $255,000 General Obligation Bonds of 1981
I'
For the Bonds of this IsstJe which shall mature and bear interest at the annual rate, as follows, we
offer a price of $ and accrued interest to the date of delivery.
1; % 1984 % 1988
} % 1985 % 1989
s % 1986 % 1990
% 1987 % 1991
�i
' % 1992
In making this offer we accept all of the terms and conditions of the Official Terms of Offering
published in the Official Statement for the fssue dated December 30 1980 . Inthe event of
failure to deliver 3o sr inaccordance with the Official Terms o�Offering as printed in the
Official Statement and made a part hereof, we reserve the right to withdraw our offer,
where cn f i deposit accompanying it will be immediately returned. All blank spaces of this
offer are intentional and are not to be construed as an omission.
Account Members
I
a
Account Manager
BY:
CJ
----------------------------------------------•--------------•-------- -----------
Not as a part of our offer, the above quoted prices being controlling, but only as on aid for the
verification of the offer, we have made the following computations:
NET INTEREST COST S Received good faith check
for return to bidder as of
NET EFFECTIVE RATE % the date of this offer.
SPRINGSTEO Incorporated by
_................................
The foregoing offer *i s hereby r�cccpted by the Issuer m the dote al the offer by its IofIowing
officers duty authorized aid empowered to rnoke such occep lance.
Administrator Mayor
OFFICIAL 13ID FORM
TO: Gary Wieber, Administrator DATE: January 12, 1981
y City Hall
3f 250 East Broadway
Monticello, Mirnesoto 55362
r�
RE: $160,000 General Obtigation Improvement Bonds of 1981
For the Bonds of this Issue which shall mature and bear interest of the annual rate, as follows, we
offer a price of $ and accrued interest to the date of delivery.
% 1983 % 1988
% 1984 % 1989
% 1985 % 1990
% 1986 % 1991
% 1987 % 1992
In making this offer we accept all of the terms and conditions of the Official Terms of Offering
published in the Official Statement for the Issue dated December 30, 1980 . In the event of
failure to delivert eF se Bo sn� in accordance with the. Official Terms of Offering as printed in the
Official Statement and made a part hereof, we reserve the right to withdraw our offer,
wiereur the deposit accompanying it will be immediately returned. All blank spaces of this
offer ora intentional and are not to be construed as an emission.
Account Members
BY:
Account Manager
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not as a part of our offer, the above quoted prices being controlling, but only as an aid for the
verification of theoffer, we have made the following computations:
NET INTEREST COST S Received good foiih check
for return to bidder as of
NET EFFECTIVE BATE % the dote of this offer.
SPRItJGSTEfO Incorporated by
foregoing
..................................................,.............
The oiler is hereby accepted by the issuer on Onr- dote of the offer by its Inilowing
Officers duly authorized acid empowered to make such occeptance.
Administrator Mayor
OFFICIAL 13ID FORM
TO: Gary Wieber, Administrator DATE: January 12, 1981
y City Hall
3f 250 East Broadway
Monticello, Mirnesoto 55362
r�
RE: $160,000 General Obtigation Improvement Bonds of 1981
For the Bonds of this Issue which shall mature and bear interest of the annual rate, as follows, we
offer a price of $ and accrued interest to the date of delivery.
% 1983 % 1988
% 1984 % 1989
% 1985 % 1990
% 1986 % 1991
% 1987 % 1992
In making this offer we accept all of the terms and conditions of the Official Terms of Offering
published in the Official Statement for the Issue dated December 30, 1980 . In the event of
failure to delivert eF se Bo sn� in accordance with the. Official Terms of Offering as printed in the
Official Statement and made a part hereof, we reserve the right to withdraw our offer,
wiereur the deposit accompanying it will be immediately returned. All blank spaces of this
offer ora intentional and are not to be construed as an emission.
Account Members
BY:
Account Manager
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not as a part of our offer, the above quoted prices being controlling, but only as an aid for the
verification of theoffer, we have made the following computations:
NET INTEREST COST S Received good foiih check
for return to bidder as of
NET EFFECTIVE BATE % the dote of this offer.
SPRItJGSTEfO Incorporated by
foregoing
..................................................,.............
The oiler is hereby accepted by the issuer on Onr- dote of the offer by its Inilowing
Officers duly authorized acid empowered to make such occeptance.
Administrator Mayor
OFFICIAL_ !9D 170RM
TO: Gary Wieber, Administrator DATE: January 12, 198 1
44 City Hall
250 East Broadway
Monticello, Minnesota 55362
RE: $160,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1981
For the Bonds of this Issue which shall mature and bear interest at the annual rate, as follows, we
offer a price of $ and accrued interest to the date of delivery.
% 1983 % 1988
% 1984 % 1989
% 1985 % 1990
% 1986 % 1991
% 1987 % 1992
In making this offer we accept all of the terms and conditions of the Official Terms of Offering
published in the Official Statement for the Issue dated December 30, 1980 . In the event of
failure to deliver t eseon sin occordonce w ith the Official Terms of Offering as printed in the
Official Statement and made a part hereof, we reserve the right to withdraw our offer,
wTereuprn t�eposit accompanying it will be immediately returned. All blank spaces of this
Woffer are intentional and are not to be construed as an omission.
(4
Account Members
BY:
Account Manager
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not as a part of our offer, the above quoted prices being coitrolliruJ, but only as an aid for the
verification of the offer, we have more the following computations:
NET IN TEREST COST $ Received good faith check
for return to bidder as of
NET EFFECTIVE f2ATE % the date of this offer.
SPRINGSIEO Incorporated by
.......................................................................I..........I..
The foregoing offer is hereby crcepted by the Issuer on the date of the offer by its following
officers duly authorized and empowered to make such acceptance.
Administrator Mayor
OFFICIAL_ !9D 170RM
TO: Gary Wieber, Administrator DATE: January 12, 198 1
44 City Hall
250 East Broadway
Monticello, Minnesota 55362
RE: $160,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1981
For the Bonds of this Issue which shall mature and bear interest at the annual rate, as follows, we
offer a price of $ and accrued interest to the date of delivery.
% 1983 % 1988
% 1984 % 1989
% 1985 % 1990
% 1986 % 1991
% 1987 % 1992
In making this offer we accept all of the terms and conditions of the Official Terms of Offering
published in the Official Statement for the Issue dated December 30, 1980 . In the event of
failure to deliver t eseon sin occordonce w ith the Official Terms of Offering as printed in the
Official Statement and made a part hereof, we reserve the right to withdraw our offer,
wTereuprn t�eposit accompanying it will be immediately returned. All blank spaces of this
Woffer are intentional and are not to be construed as an omission.
(4
Account Members
BY:
Account Manager
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not as a part of our offer, the above quoted prices being coitrolliruJ, but only as an aid for the
verification of the offer, we have more the following computations:
NET IN TEREST COST $ Received good faith check
for return to bidder as of
NET EFFECTIVE f2ATE % the date of this offer.
SPRINGSIEO Incorporated by
.......................................................................I..........I..
The foregoing offer is hereby crcepted by the Issuer on the date of the offer by its following
officers duly authorized and empowered to make such acceptance.
Administrator Mayor
WA V
t,ha j4e 1 00 f
vwwbl 1, 1.'r
Ilk, ws
r i 4
r 1v q;
tw,
If
10
17
lt
:""J. I'T 1� Il -1 1 Ll,;; Y I t4i,:4
'104ve4-vu 11A OL eA
44AO Ire& I
'r:N
RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY UF.
PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OP REPORT'
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of Monticello, Minnesour
1. A petition requesting the improvements listed below for the property
indicated has been filed with the Cuuucil on January 12 19 81 is
hereby declared to be signed by the required percontnbe of property affected
thereby. This declaration is made in conformity with Minnesota Statutes 429.015.
IMPROVEMENT REQUESTED:
Extension of sewer, water, street, curb and gutter, and storm sever
to serve Lots 10 through 14, Block 1, Lots 1,& 2, Block 5 and Lots 11 through
p
15, Block 4, all in The Meadows Subdivision Plat.
2. The petition is hereby n:ferred to John Iladalich, and he is instruccod'
I� to report to the Council with all convenient spend advising: the cuuncil in :c
k'
preliminary way an In whether the proponad impruvenwilt in fonsible and an go
'
-whether ii aliould beat be made asproposed or in conm:etimt with some other
improvement, and the escimated'cost of the improvement as ri:conunended.
J
i
Motion to adopt resolution wan made by councilmember
seconded by councilmember
4� y G
i
Voting in favor:
Opposed:
Adopted by the City Council this 12th day if January 1981 .
if
Cary viehrr,
City Administrator
1, 2
CITY OF MONTICELLO COMMISSIONS Tue / E'•'CA"" (/�.J �r j
FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES [i> r'F2)
PLANNING COMMISSION
Jim Ridgeway
John Bondhus
Bill Burke
Ed Schaffer
Dick Mortie
Loren Klein (ex -officio)
DOWNTOWN PARKING COMI•IITTEE V
SS
Lovell (Bud) Schrupp
Lloyd Lund
John Poirier Il`
Marn Flicker nQ�
HOUSING 6 REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Leo Nelson (Chairman) (1-1-83)(� _p��o
Vic Vokaty (1-1-81) (expired) `F
Robert Doty (1-1-82)
George DeMars (1-I-85)
Ken Tvedt (1-1-84)
BISTORICAL SOCIETY
Marion Jameson
Ruth 6 Hugh McKinnon
David Newkirk
6eae,6 Sue—Erickson
Fr•artci1'-6 Mi Ie Moon r' ,y,�,r•"
Marguerite Perrault
Caroline Elli>un �!
Connie Decker
Cladys-NmRrunnen
Beatrice -Davis
Elizabeth LaBree
Flay McCoy
Velma Ilnlldorf
Oriole-Huseth-
Isabel.11olker
Mr.6Mrs. Frank Thompson.,
Oscar 6 Florence Tapper
JOINT RECREATION BOARD
City - Ron Peters, Rick Wolfsteller-
(ax-officio)
C I! School - Russ Martic, Cordon Link
JOINT FIRE BOARD - City Renresentative
Rick Wolfsteller
4
Qi D:Ne�or�(aw 61 -j
SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER BOARD c N//^' Cr/•sr-Pr�
Leo Nelson - PresidentIe
(��.��/��,�
Barry Stokes - Treasurer
Marie Peterson - Secretary .�
Sheldon Johnson
Lloyd Lund
Harry Schaffer /
Frank Thompson /
Hugh McKinnon
Marie Bruning
Caroline Ellison
Karen Hanson - (ex -officio)
BOARD OF APPEALS - (lousing; 6 Building; Code
Council with Mayor as Chairperson
MONTICELLO COMHUNIT'Y EDUCATION ADVISORY
COUNCIL - City Representative
Fran Fair
ORDERLY ANNEXATION AREA REPRESENTATIVE
Arve Grimsmo
ACTING MAYOR
Philip White
CITY ATTORNEY
Gwy Pt iuglc
AUDITORS
Cruys, Johnson 6 Anoociates
CONSULTING ENCINEER
Oar-Schelen-Mayeron 6 Asocciates
CONSULTING PLANNER
Howard Dahlgren Associates
OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER
Monticello Times
OFFICIAL DEPOSITORIES
Wright County State Bonk
Security Federal Savings 6 Loan
First bank at Minneapolis
L/
• I AGREEMENT
I
AGI(CEMENT made this 2nd _ day of January 1980, by and between
the CITY OF MONTICF.LW a municipal corpurdliun, of the•stdte of
Minnesota, -first party, and YMCA OF NETCOPOLITAI MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota, a
duly organized non-profit corporation, second party.
01EREAS, second party has organized a Detached Worker•Program fcr the
Northwest suburban arca for the general purpose of assisting youth in finding
and living a lifestyle acceptable to themselves and the society in which
they exist; and
WHEREAS, first party, recognizing its commitment to its youth to help
shape the development of its young citizens and that traditional youth pro-
grams, facilities and activities do not reach all of its youth, has pledged
the sum of Two Thousand Five hundred and oo dollars ($2,500.00 )
to contract with second party for the services of a detached worker in accord -
ante with second party's Detached Worker Program.
4- NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions
hereinafter contained, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
1. First party, in consideration of the sum of Two Thousand Five
Hundred Dollars to be paid to second party at the rate of Two Hund--
(5208.33)
Cud right &J7yloo fler month payable in advance each of the months for which this
ar$
agreement shall run, hereby contracts with second party for the period of
twelve months from and after JAnuary 2. 1980 , for the services of a
detached worker to be hired, trained, paid and supervised by second party in
accordance with its Detached Worker Program.
2. Second party hereby agrees to provide first party with a qualified
detached worker to perform substantially the following services for first party:
a. Meet with police at least monthly to share information and
mutual concerns,
b. Concentrate on street work and maintain youth contact in iden-
tical hangouts.
e. Maintain active counseling relationships with 50 youth.
d. Maintain counseling relationships with 15 families.
e. Act as !uppor syl:em an! .nceler fc• youth c"d their
families in times of trouble.
f. Provide 24-hour crisis intervention to troubled youth and
their families, as well as assist police and other cormunity
agents in the prevention and intervention of crisis -related
situations.
g. Maintain cooperative relationship; with all youth -serving
agencies which may provide alternatives for trOUblyd youth.
h. Provide quarterly evaluations of the Detached Workar Prop—
to
roy^to city administration, police department and other cors -unity
agencies.
1. Hunts with City Council on a quarterly h•sis to review rrogrc•i.0
of prog rsm,
t!J
3. Second party agrees to indeninify and 1.! indemnified and defend,
hold and save harmless first party from and against any and all actions or
causes or action, calims, demands, loss, damage or expense which either party
shall or may at any time sustain, precipitate or incur by reason of the con-
duct of said detached worker or other employees, agents and servants of second
party acting within the scope of or in connection with said Detached ,,,orl:cr
Program.
4. To assure first party of sernnd party's i'erformr.ncc of the cbli-
gations contained in paragraph 3, second party hereby further agrees to carry
and keep in force liability insurance (including bodily injury and property
damage coverage) in the minimum amount of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00).
Said insurance to be with a reliable insurance company licensed to do busi-
ness in Minnesota. Second party shall furnish and file witlrfirst party the
insurer's Certificate of Insurance indicating that secon�, party has insurance
coverage in force in the minimum amount aforesaid covering the period for
which this agreement is to be performed.
IN HITNEES WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to
be executed in their behalf by their pruper officers thereunto duly authorized
and their corporate seals to be affixed hereto the day and year first above
writte.
in the Presence of: Ci tv of MONTICELLO
Byr
MAYOR
r 1
and
.�, CITY nnta,Idr.TriL-,•rnu
WE
YMCA OF METROPOLITA'! MINNEAPOLiS
by L
estDEt+
VICE-PRESIDEN
J
P
t
GENERAL FUND - DECEMBER - 1980
AMOUNT
CHECK NO.
Mal . State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees
192.00
13794
City of Brooklyn Park - Booklet
2.00
13795
State Treasurer - Soc. Security Fund payment
3077.43
13796
Comm. of Revenue - State W/H tax
1463.70
13797
MM. State Treasurer - PERA
992.07
13798
Petty Cash - Mise. postage, etc.
30.99
13799
Monticello Fire Dept. - Payroll
1064.00
13800
Wright County State Bank - Investments
150000.00
13801
North Central Public Service - Utilities
544.69
13802
Monticello Times - Misc. publishing and printing
437.84
13803
State of MN. - Document Section - Pamphlet
4.50
13804
Newman Signs - Street signs
123.51
13805
W3ight County Auditor - Assessor fees for 1980
6965.05
13806
Orr Schclon Mayeron - Misc. eng. fees
9803.67
13807
Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone (55.25 reimb. by OSM)
526.81
13808
Water Products - Water dept. supplies
117.60
13809
Century Laboratories - Street supplies
38.79
13810
Superior Blacktop - Street repair - 79-1 Imp.
445.00
13811
Davis Electronic Service - Pager repairs- Fire Dept.
61.23
13812
Phillips Petro. Corp. - Gas for sewer dept.
56.86
13813
Mobil Oil Corp. - Gas for fire dept.
90.20
13814
State Tress. - Surplus Property Fund - Misc. tQuls, etc.
47.50
13815
Wright County State Bank - Investments
352962.50
13816
Gould Bros. - Repair to truck
202.40
13817
Foster ins. Agency - Ins. for Fire Dept.
340.20
13818
Northwestern Bell - Telephone for Fire Dept.
22.74
13819
Walt Mack - Mileage to school
22.00
13820
2cp Mfg. Co. - Sewer Dept. supplies
165.63
13821
St. Paul Book 5 Stationery - Historical Comm. supplies
29.76
13822
Matt Theisen - Mileage to school
16.60
13823
John Simola - Misc. mileage
24.48
13824
Bronteson Construction - Street 6 Water Depts. repairs
962.00
13825
St. Cloud Appraisal Service - Appraisal on new Ford garage
570.00
13826
for Flake appeal
National Bushing - Misc. supplies for all depta.
151.81
13827
Monticello O. K. Hardwaro - Supplies
1.25
13828
Feed Rite Controls - Sower tooting
47.50
13829
coast to Coast - Sower dept. supplies
53.26
13830
Gross Industrial - Laundry
61.20
13831
Earl 11. Anderson - Street signs, posts, etc.
241.10
13832
Olson 5 Sons Electric - Lift station repairs
90.54
13833
Monticello Office Products - Misc. office supplies
482.30
13834
Banker's Life Ins. - Group ins.
1812.39
13835
Loof Broo. - laundry
104.75
13836
Purcell Plumbing 6 Hosting - Service call at 4AJTP
25.00
13837
Clearwater Enterpriaos - Street supplies
144.96
13838
Maus Foods - Misc. supplies
40.68
13839
Arvo Grimamo - OAA Board meetings
90.00
13840
W Roy Engstrom - OAA Board mootino s mileage.
52.80
13841
Paul McAlpine - OAA Board mooting
19.94
13842
Franklin Dann - OAA Board meatings
75.00
13843
Baoil Schillowaort - OAA Board meeting
15.00
13844
8
r�
GENERAL FUND
AMOUNT
CHECK NO.
Tom Salkowski - OAA Board meetings
150.00
13845
Marjorie Goetzke - OAA Board meetings recording
105.00
13846
Corrow Sanitation - Contract payment
3450.00
13847
Security Federal Savings s Loan - Investments
40000.00
13848
Maus Foods - Misc. supplies all depts.
77.34
13849
Brenteson Construction - Class 5 for commuter parking lot
200.00
13850
OSM - Misc. eng. fees - 78-1 Imp. Project
5689.61
13851
Olson Electric - Senior Citizens repair
423.07
13852
Equitable Life Assurance - Ins. payment
40.00
13853
Gould Bros. Chev. - Fire truck repair
67.77
13854
Our Own Hardware - Supplies for all depts.
261.66
13855
December payroll 15447.47
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS $600825.35
E1
LIQUOR FUND
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
CNECK
DECEMBER DISBURSEMENTS - 1980
NO.
Wright County state Bank - Investments
22000.00
9517
State Treasurer - Social Security Fund
298.78
9518
Comm. of Revenue - State W/Ii tax
165.40
9519
Comm. of Revenue - Sales tax
2641.49
9520
MN. State Treasurer - PERA
150.13
9521
Johnson Bros. - Liquor
1398.58
9522
Twin City Wine - Liquor
647.84
9523
Ed Phillips 6 Sons - Liquor
5924.68
9524
Griggs, Cooper s Co. - Liquor
1222.78
9525
Banker's Life - Group Ins.
200.67
9526
Wright County State Bank - Investments
30000.00
9527
Maus Foods - Mise. supplies
42.00
9528
Our Own Hardware - Misc. supplies
21.95
9529
Mark Arns - Mileage to Buffalo
8.00
9530
Ed Phillips 6 Sons - Liquor
6896.06
9531
Twin City Wine - Liquor
1816.27
9532
Johnson Bros. - Liquor
151.OG
9533
Griggs, Cooper - Liquor
2986.35
9534
Trushenski Trucking - Freight
387.80
9535
Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone
52.89
9536
Monticello Times - Advertising
390.15
9537
North Central Public Service - Utilities
118.44
9538
Purcell Plumbing 6 Heating - Reapirs
65.00
9539
Midwest Wine Co. - Wine
544.30
9540
Old Peoria - Liquor
680.10
9541
December Payroll 2914.77
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS $81745.49
9
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
December 8, 1980 - 7:30 P.M.
Members Present: Arve Grimsmo, Dan Blonigen, Fran Fair, Ken Maus, Phil White.
Members Absent: None
1. Consideration of Non-Intoxicatinq Malt Liquor License - Pizza Factory.
Mr. Thomas Bluth and Brian Dzieweczynski, the two principal shareholders
in UpDoc, inc., requested a non -intoxicating 3.2 beer license for an
establishment called the Pizza Factory, to be located in Sam Peraro's
complex at the southeast corner of Highway 25 and County Road 75.
UpDoc, Inc. operates other Pizza Factory outlets in the area, and indicated
that the 3.2 beer would be sold in conjunction with food service, but the
Pizza Factory would not, by itself, have a bar available for drinking just
beer at the establishment. In addition, the Pizza Factory would be open
from 4:00 P.M. til 11:00 P.M. Sunday through Thursday, and from 4:00 P.M.
til 12:00 A.M. Fridays and Saturdays.
Motion was made by Phil White, seconded by Fran Fair and unanimously carried
to approve the issuance of a non -intoxicating on -sale 3.2 beer license for
UpDoc, Inc. for the Pizza Factory.
2. Consideration of Resolution Calling for Sale of General Obligation Improve-
ment Bonds of 1981 and General Obliqation Library Bonds of 1981
Fr.. King Forness. of Springsted, Inc., Bonding Consultants for the City of
Monticello, reviewed with the Council the upcoming sale of general obliga-
tion improvement bonds of 1981 to finance the 1980-1 and 1980-2 improvement
projects, and, also the sale of general obligation library bonds to finance
approximately half the cost of the. new library.
Mr. Farness was recommending that approxi,5ately $160,000 bonds be sold
to finance the two improvement projects, with the library bond issue being
in the amount of $255,000. He estimated the interest rate to the City
over the ten years to be in the neighborhood of 8 to 9N interest. The
bonds would be sold in January of 1981, and although at the present time,
interest rates are higher than usual, it would be hard to anticipate what
the interest rates would be by waiting a few months.
Based on the recommendations of Mr. Forness of Springsted. Inc., motion was
made by Fran Fair, seconded by Dan Blonigen and unanimously carried to
adopt a resolution authorizing the sale of general obligation improvement
bonds for the 1980-1 6 1980-2 Improvement projects.
Motion was also made by Ken Maus, seconded by Fran Fair to adopt a resolution
authorizing the sale of general obligation ImptuvemenL bunds for the, library
Project of 1981 - voting in favor: Fran Fair, Arve Grimsmo, Ken Maus, Phil White;
Opposed: Dan Blonigen. (See Resolutions 1980- 028 and 29)
Council Minutes - 12/8/80
3. Consideration of Variance to July 1, 1981 for Hardsurfacing and Installation
of Continuous Curb Harrier at the Monticello Commuter Parkinn Lot. J
It was noted by Public Works Director that the Commuter Parking Lot at the
southwest corner of Highway 25 and i-94 is now ready for use by the
commuters, and that signs have been ordered and should be erected during
the week of December 8th.
Although it is the intent of the City of Monticello to hardsurface the parking
lot, a variance would be needed to operate the parking lot until the spring
of 1981 to allow adequate time to complete the hardsurfacing and curb barrier
requirements.
It was noted by Council discussion that some potential users of the commuter
parking lot have expressed some concerns in regards to security at this
location, and also thought that a phone should be installed along with
a possible shelter in the area. It was noted that these items would be
looked into in the future for possible installation.
Motion was made by Phil White, seconded by Dan Dlonigen and unanimously
carried to grant the City of Monticello a variance until July 1, 1981
to complete the hardsurfacing and concrete curb harrier requirements
at the commuter- parking lot.
4. Consideration of Calling a Pu Ill ic liearifill for the Special Assessments on
the 1980.1 and 1980.2 imorovement Projects. 1
The 1980-1 improvement project, serving Macarlund Plaza, and the 1980-2 J
improvement project, extending services along Prairie Road, is now almost
complete, and as a result, a public hearing to adopt the assessment rolls
wuuiJ have to be haid.
Motion was made by Dan Dlonigen, seconded by Phil White and unanimously
carried to set January 26, 1981 as the date for the public hearing to
consider the adoption of the assessment rolls on the two improvement projects.
5. Consideration of Enimoyinq Scan Hancock on a rull Time Davis.
for the past ten months, Sean Hancock has been employed by the City of
Monticello fn its Wastewater Treatment Plant through funding by the CETA
program, which expires December 19, 1980.
It was the recommendation of the Public Worl:s Director, John Simola, that
Mr. Hancock be hired on a full tune basis to worl. within the Public Worl'.s
Department. It was also noted that Mr. Hancock has a degree in chemistry
and ufth the new Wastewater Treatment Plant, laboratory analysis, el -C.,
will have to be Conducted on a daily basis at the now treatment plant in
the future, which Mr. Hancock mdy be qualified to do.
Motion was made by Phil White, seconded by hen Maus and unanimously carried
to employ Mr. Sean Hancock on a lull time basis in the City Sewer and Water
Department, effective December 20, 1980.
.2.
Council minutes - 12/8/80
6. Review of Emergency Plan Relative to Nuclear Power Incident with Ralph Olmos,
Director, Division of Emerqency Services.
Mr. Ralph Olmos, Director, Division of Emergency Services, reviewed with the
Council the emergency plans being implemented relative to any type of nuclear
power plant incident in Monticello. Mr. Olmos explained the importance of
having a good upcoming exercise in Monticello, and stressed that cooperatiun
is needed amongst the State, Local and County levels to insure that a good
plan is available.
Mr. Olmos also indicated that it's the City's requirement to have an emergency
plan to deal with an incident at the nuclear plant that meets lire Federal
Guidelines, to insure that the plant can continue operation in Monticello.
If, for some reason, a nuclear response plan is not acceptable to the
Federal Government, the possibility always exists that the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission could suspend the license for Northern States plant to
operate in Monticello.
Mr. Olmos noted that a test drill will be conducted in the City of
December 17, 1980, and that additionally, a full exercise that will be reviewed
by the Federal Government will be conducted in the early part of January 1981.
7. Approval of Bills for December 1980. and the Minutes of 11/24/80 Regular Mtq.
{ Motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Ken Maus and unanimously carried
Y to approve the bills for the Month of December 1980, as presented, and
the Minutes of the November 24, 1980 regular council meeting.
(See Exhibit 12/8/80 N1).
8. Consideration of Police Contract wi Or Wriqht County Sheriff's Department
for 1981.
Mr. Don Ilozempd, of the Wright County Sheriff's Depar•t.ment, reviewed with
the Council the proposed police contract for the City of Monticello for
the year 1981. The proposed contract calls for an increase in the hourly
fee from $11.50 to $12.50 per hour•, or an increase from 1980 in the amount
of $76.912 annual charge to $83,400 for 1981.
Motion was made by Phil White, seconded by Dan Blonigen and unanimously
carried to approve entering into a Contr-aCt with the Wright County Sheriff's
Department for police protection for the yedr 1981 in the total amount of
S83,400.
3-
9
Council Minutes - 1218190
9. Discussion on Sanitary Interceptor Sewer Line Easement - John and Joan Bondhus. J
As part of the Wastewater Treatment Plant upgrading, a large interceptor
sewer line will be constructed from Washington Street near the railroad
tracks, through the school district's property, then crossing over County
Road 75 to the Wastewater Treatment Plant. The proposed route of the
interceptor sewer line would require an casement from Bondhus Tool Corpora-
tion to cross their northwest corner of their• property prior to the inter-
ceptor sewer line crossing in a northerly direction towards the treatment
plant. The original plans called for the sewer line to be laid on the
south right-of-wiy of County Road 75 thus requiring a 10' temporary easement
from the Bondhus Corporation, but it was recently found out that a large
telephone cable is currently in the locatiun of the proposed sewer line,
thus requiring additional easements from the Bondhus Corporation in order
to install the sewer line in the original location.
Mr. John Bondhus was not receptive to the additional temporary easement area
and permanent casement on his property, and an additional route was established
The new route established by the engineer would have the sewer line crossing
County Road 75 west of the original location, but an additional temporary
edsement would still be required 1 -ruin lar. Boodbus, as he also owns the
property on the north side of County Road 75. In an effort to obtain
this casement from Mr. Bondhus, Mr. Bondhus requested some concessions from
the. City prior to the casement being given. These concessions included
Lhdt the contractor or the City would be liable for any damage done to his
ponds, including fish that would be destroyed, that trees would be planted J
to replace those that have to be taken down, and finally that if and when
a sewer line is placed along the south side of County Road 75 e,ctending
past his Bondhus lool Corporation building, that he only he assessed for
sewer improvements for the first approximately 500' of his property that
would reach his building.
Mr. Bondhus's concern was that his small triangular parcel on the south side
of County Road 75 is approximately 1,141 feet lung, and that the easterly
650' of his parcel at the present time is not suited for any type of building
or development, and requested that if the sever line is ever placed on this
side of County Road 75, that he be eyempl from paying any assessments for
the unusahle portion.
Motion was made. by Dan Dlonigen, seconded by Knit haus and unanimously carried
to enter into a legal dgreement that would defer on a Permanent basis any
assessments against the easterly 650' of the present Bondhus Tool Corporation
property until such time as this portion of his property would develop a
structure that would require sewage utilities in exchange for• the necessary
temporary easement on the north side of Highway 75 for the interceptor sewer
line. The effect of this motion was that unless any building is developed
on the easterly 650' that would require the actual use of sewage utilities,
there would be no assessments levied in the future against. the Bondhus Corpora-
tion, or owner of the property at that time.
- 4 -
Council Minutes - 12/8/80
4 10. Consideration of Purchasing Additional Truck - Public Works Department.
John Simola, Public Works Director, reviewed with the Council his recom-
mendation that the City consider purchasing an additional truck chassis
in the year 1981.
Mr. Simola indicated that the nee, truck, if purchased, would be used to
replace the current 72 Chev truck, and that the box and plow attachments
from the 72 Chev could be used on the new chassis, with the 72 Chev truck
chassis being used by the City in the future for a new sewer jet cleaning
machine, if purchased.
Mr. Simola explained a five year plan the City has for replacing its current
vehicles and acquiring new ones, and indicated that the new truck chassis
is recommended for purchase either in 1981 or 1982.
it was the consensus of the Council to table any action on this purchase
for further review.
11. Line of Succession - Civil Defense Authority.
Motion was made by Phil Whi te, seconded by Fran Fair and unanimously
carried to adopt the following line of succession for Civil Defense command:
{ 1. Arve Grimsmo
2. Phil White
3. Fran Fair
4. Ken Maus
5. Dan Blonigen
G. Civil Defense Dirrrtor
7. Dr.pu ty Civil Defense Director
8. County hoard Chairman
Meeting% adjourned.
Ricl. Wolfstel,ler
Assistant Administrator
RW/ns
-5-
1
COUNCIL UPDATE
January 12, 1981 Meeting,
Commuter Parking Lot
Thus for, the commuter parking lot has been well used, and the count
has been approximately 50 cars. As a result, there appears to be
only a handful of commuters that still use the downtown parking lots.
Shortly, a sign will be erected in the downtown municipal parking lots
indicating no commuters.
Library Progress
The architects are in the process of completing the plans and
specifications for the new library, and these should be completed for
approval by the City Council in February. It is expected that bids
will be able to be let in March, with construction to start the first
part of April.
11
i� MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
December 2, 1980 - 7:00 P. M.
Members Present: Arve Crimsmo, Dan Blonigen, Fran Fair, Ken Maus, Phil White.
Members Absent: None
The purpose of this meeting was to review and Set the salaries for 1981 for all
non-union employees.
After holding a brief review session with each non-union employee, except for
Administrative Staff Clerical personnel, a motion was made by Ken Maus, seconded
by Fran Fair to adopt the salary schedule as follows:
EMPLOYEE MONTHLY SALARY X INCREASE
Karen Manson $ 814 12.3
Walter Mack 1,579 11.8
Roger Mack 1,603 11.5
Mark lrmiter 1,858 11.5
Loren Klein 1,620 8.0
John Simola 1,992 11.6
Rick Wolfsteller 1,727 12.0
Cary Wicber 2,775 11.0
Voting in favor of this motion - Ken Maus, Fran Fair, Arve Crimsmo.
Opposed - Phil White, Dan Blonigen.
A motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Dan Blonigen and unanimously carried
to establish a top rate for City Administrative Clerical personnel at a range
of $5.90 - 6.20 per hour.
Meeting adjourned.
Car✓Wicber/,
City Admin otrator
CW/no
9
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
December G, 1980 - 7:00 A.M.
Members Present: Arve Grimsmo, Dan Blonigen, Fran Fair, Phil White.
Members Absent: Ken Maus
Purpose of the meeting was to review the Civil Defense Plan with Loren Klein,
Civil Defense Director, relative to the Emergency Training Exercises that
would be taking place in the City of Mont' --cello on Dece:aber 17, 1980 and
January 7, 1981. The December 17, 1980 exercise is to be a tabletop exer-
cise with the January 7, 1981 drill a full-fledged exercise.
Mr. Klein reviewed the role of the Council and the Mayor as it relates to
the overall emergency plan.
After review of the plan as it related to the Mayor and the Council, the
meeting was adjourned.
W
a-
7 lel
City Administrator
GW/na
so i_-.-'-=-- --�tBCeu..rFAHwrrM—IN�WNErlSgOh}TACSai"nl1y3_ �T,.r � Jem-_e`f� F. Powers, Chief Deputy
_
20 H.E. T�Npho.r�
—�� �-1.� - qn.E �rP�M 8w, N0.68Z3aa0 r _� -_ -: .' Nero A716673
OARREL L-WOLFP �- iiC30 Z 1=__� a1md-11a 265-2533
Odene 972.292/
=---
•� Coketn 266-Fise`+t _
December 22, 1980
Honorable Mayor
City Council
Monticello, Minn. 55362
Gentlemen:
Enclosed is the Sheriff's Law Enforcement report for the month of November, 1980.
552 hours of patrol service were contracted for during the period in which the
following activities were tallied:
1 - Threats - cleared by mediation
1 - Theft of tools from trailer parked at construction site at the power plant
1 - Theft of bicycle - recovered the next day
1 - Vandalism - tires on vehicle flattened ,
1 - No pay customer at Perkins - cleared by arrest 6 restitution made
1 - Theft of chain saw from garage
1 - Property damage - windshield busted out
I - Criminal damage to property - 13 windows broken out at Oakwood School
1 - Theft of auto - recovered later in St. Paul
2 - Thefts of 3 bicycles
1 - Burglary at Monti Country Club - cleared by arrest 6 restitution ordered
1 - Burglary at Pinewood Clcmentary - nothing missing - door damaged
I - Attempted theft - scared off
2 - Shoplifting at Snyder Drug - cleared by mediation
1 - Terroristic threats, assault 6 criminal damage to property - cleared by arrest
1 - Theft of fireball
I - Theft of tire d rim from vehicle at Monti ford
1 - Soliciting without permit - left town
1 - Armed robbery at Poirier Drug - under investigation
1 - Criminal damage to property - tail light on car kicked in - cleared 6 restitution made
1 - Criminal damage to property - house egged
1 - Theft of traps
1 - Mailbox vandalism
1 - Arrest for misrepresentation of age
I - Arrest for public nuisance 6 disorderly conduct
_
_ _ Cou H �:tyne eo�mr =_-_
LO MINN At: � _ �L 7-,�, . Y.
�r co° =Jamas F: Powan, Chief Deputy^
-='rte-
•:_r - _ •�.� - - :�---_�_ �21tWw�Ema9wKyTN�pAo�.�--
_ ---r= -' Z'hla►E•maa�W:�i�: No:682�900- ---' �'NbwA738673 - -
OARRfit4trMlOLFJ�C-=��Montl'u�b _Co295-25.13
untrsh'rm-_e72as2a
coiom zsse9s9- -:T—
Sheriff's
_---- -
Sheriff's report for tdonticello for November, 1980 continued:
1 - Arrest for bench warrant
1 - Property damage - vehicle damaged by another vehicle
1 - Criminal damage to property - sign at McDonald's tore down
10 - Citations issued for worthless cheeks
4 - Annoying phone calls - three were cleared
I - Fire reported
2 - Harassment
1 - Prowler reported
4 - Animal complaints
1 - Alarm sounded
6 - Traffic complaints
7 - Suspicious circumstances
7 - Disturbances 6 public nuisance
2 - Possible drug abuse
1 - School bus violation
2 - Runaways - returned
1 - Recovered property
2 - Domestics
1 - Intoxicated person
1 Attempt. to locate - returned
104 - Car 6 subject checks
38 - Citizen aids
21 - Motorists warned
14 - Accidents investigated
S - Open doors
I - Repair tag issued
45 - Traffic tickets issued:
1 - Passing 1 - Careless driving
15 - Speed I - Driving after revocation
13 - Illegal parking 1 - Driving vhlie Intoxicated
3 - No insurance I - Erratic driving
2 - School bus stop violation 1 - Improper registration
2 Stop sign 1 - Driver license violation
1,,-,e-Fatlure to show tabs 2 - Mufflers
/,Yours trul .,.
/�`"'�/rte/��j�74
rrel{ V)olffi, Sh9riff
Billing: For the month of November, 1980 -- $ 6,378.66
Monticello car handled 23 calls outsido the city limits. 26 calls were handled within
the city by the county roving patrol during periods of time when the contract car was
nut 6cheduled. This doe& not includo investigation or officer personnel time.
QUARTERLY REPORT OF THE
MONTICELLO FIRE DEPARTMENT
President — Jim Maurice
Vice President — Marn Flicker
Secretary — Lee Trunnell
Treasurer — Willard Anderson
Chief — Paul Klein Joint Committeeman — Lee Trunnell
Assistant Chief — Gordon Link Training Officer — Gene Jensen
1st Captain — David Kranz Asst. Training Officer — Ted Farnum
2nd Captain — George Liefert
The following is a quarterly report of the Monticello Fire Department from Oct, 1, 1980
thru Dec. 31, 1980.
There were 22 personal assists by the Chief andfor Assistant Chief. Also, assistance was
given by volunteer firemen in the presentation of Township Fire Contracts.
There were 15 fires which required 263 man hours. The average attendance at a fire
was 18,
During thu t,dst tiuve month period there wera 3 training xssions which required 57
man house. Tho average attendance at those (raining sessions was 19. Along with
these training sessions, there were 2 additional training sessions on civil defense which
requited 88 man hours and the average attendance at these sesssions was 17.
Respectfully Submitted by,
David B. Kranz f
Reporter
bj k
0
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE MONTICELLO FIRE DEPT.
President — Jim Maurice
Vice President — Marti Flicker
Secretary — Lee Trunnell
Treasurer — Willard Anderson
Chief — Paul Klein Joint Committeeman — Lee Trunnell
Assistant Chief — Gordon Link Training Officer — Gene Jensen
1st Captain — David Kranz Asst. Training Officer — Ted Farnum
2nd Captain — George Liefert
The following is an anuual report of the Monticello Fire Department from Jan. 1, 1980
thru December 31, 1980.
There were 78 personal assists by the Chief and/or Assistant Chief. Also assistance was
given by volunteer firemen in the presentation of Township Fire Contracts.
There were 72 fires which required 1698 man hours. The average attendance at a fire
was 17.
During the past year there were 12 training sessions which required 445 man huurs and
an average attendance of 22 men. Also, there were 2 training sessions on civil defense
which required 88 man hours and the average attendance at these sessions was 17.
d+ The department manned a booth at Expo '80. We showed a film and served coffee at
the booth.
The department held an open house at the barn on June 14. The attendance improved
over the last year and the departmynt dirt many demonstrations that day.
Also, a Brownie Troop toured the fire barn on Sept. 30. Two men from the department
gave the tour.
Two men attended a L.P. Gas Burn demonstration held at Albertville. Four men attended
sectional school at Brainerd on March 1.2 and seven men attended the sectional school at
Duluth on April 26-7.7.
Respectfully submitted, hy,
David B. Kranz
Reporter
bilk
CO:JSTRUCTIO PAYIXNT VOUCIIER
4 ESti nate Voucher No. 9 6 Final
Bate: 29, .19tp For Period Ending: Final November 30. 1980
Project taumbers: 9—
Class of Work: 'anitary Sewer, stater Main, Street.Pavinq a Appurtenant work
City of Monticello to: Barbarossa S Sons Inc.
93rd 6 Zachary Lane N.
Route 3
Osseo, Minn.. 55369
A. Original Contract Amount S 839,599.00
B. Total Additions $ 33,656.85
C. Total Deductions $ 5,655.00
D. Total Funds Encumbered S 867,600.85
E. Totdl Value of Work Certified to Date $ 837.383.90
F. Less Retained Percentage 0 $ $ 0.00
G. Less Total Previous Payments $ 819,175.73
H. Approved for Payment, this Report $ 18,208.17
_ I. Total Payments Including this Voucher $ 837,383.90
J. Balance Carried Forward $ 30,216.95
APPROVALS
O.ZR-SCHELF.N-MAYEROV d 70SOCIATES. INC.
.leas is to certify that the iters of work shown in the Statem.ent of t:ork P:c-
forncd herein have been actually furnished for the above mentioned project
^_ accordance with the plans and saecifica tions heretofore approved ind that
the total work is 100% completed as of Novem 5r 30, ,980 I hereby
1
recommend payment o—r —this voucher. /
Signed
Aalbaros;sa 6 S rr- Inc.
This is to certify that to the best of my Y.nowledge, infomation, and belief,
the quantities and values of work certified herein is a fair approximate est -
in ate for the period covered by this voucher.
DA to Signed by:
Citv of Monticello
t — 'Voucher Checked o,,,:
IL
Date: rt�l�r
068-3018
;,.i,ruvcd for Payment:
,Authorized F:epras:ntative
Date:
Page 1 of 7
UNIT 8
HOW EQUIPPED 6 TYPE
MODEL YEAR
APPEARANCE CONDITION
1
Truck, wing, plow, sander
18001nt
1972
Fair -Poor
3
2
Truck, plow
1700Int
1975
Good
1
3
Truck, plow
C-60Chev
1972
Fair
2
4
Loader (bucket)
H-651nt
1971
Fair
4
5
Pickup
F-250Ford
1975
Fair
2
6
Van
C-20Chev
1974
Good
2
7
Loader (pesthole auger)
Int .250U
1976
Fair
2
(scraper, debarker, mower)
8
Sweeper
Elgin
1978
Fair
l
10
Carden Tractor, mower b blower
400 J.1).
1976
Fnir
4
11
Truck, plow, wing 6 sander
1800 Inc.
1978
Good
1
12
Tractor (sickle mower)
Int. Cub
1947
Fair
2
14
Chipper
Asplundah
1975
Good
1
15
Carden Tractor, mower
107 Cub CadcL1970-1
Fair
2
16
Garden Tractor, mower,blower,4x4
Bolens244
1980
Good
2
20
Grader, v -plow, wing
A -W Super200
1963
Fair
2
21
Packer
DynaPacC608
1978
Fair
2
22
Plate Tamper
Hamel ice
1979
Good
I
23
Wood Splitter
LaFont
1980
Good
1
24
Debarker
Morbark
1980
Good
2
25
Liquid Sprayer
Meyers IOOgal
1980
Good
1
M-37
Pickup
Army 4x4
1951
Good
4
48
Air Compressor
Smitli32-1565
1967
Poor
5
26
Bucket Machine, Loader
WHP-PL
1966
FaIr
2
27
Bucket Machine, Pullin
91111-81)
1966
Fair
2
28
Rodding Machine
RIHLS-2
1976
Good
2
29
Air Blower
Homelite 6"
1971
Good
2
30
Mud Pump
Homelite 3"
1973
Good
2
31
Pipe Punher
Giant P11-31'
Fair
2
32
Paint Striper
BZI.inar
1976
Fair
3
33
Tar Pot
Unknown
Old
Poor
2
CONDITION EXPLANATION
1 - Excellent - no known repairs needed,
2 - Soma minor repairs, appearance
or adjuotmonta
neoded.
3 - Several minor repairs or adjuutmenta, showing
nigno
of wear, possible
roplaes.
4 - Major ropaira - ponnible replacement.
5 •• major ropaira - immediate replacement.
IL
If the items were purchased from the lowest quote, the following breakdown
occurs:
Akins Fire Equipment
Chemical Suits
$2,170
Helmets
60
Boots
195
Gloves
779
Hoods
6GO
TOTAL
$3,864
St. Cloud Fire Equipment
Deluge Gun
$1,365
Air Tanks
750
TOTAL
$2,115
Continental Safety
Smoke masks
$1,240
$1,240
Davie Electronics
Handheld Radios $1,622
Pagers 554
TOTAL $2,176
TOTAL EXPENDITURES REQUESTED FOR APPROVAL .59,395
IL
Thv FOLLOWING
ARE QUOTES OBTAINED FROM VARIOUS
FIRE EQUIPRENT SUPPLIERS
FOR SOME
OF THE ITEMS INCLUDED IN THE
1981 FIRE FUND
CAPITAL OUTLAY BUDGET
1981 BUDGET
AY.INS FIRE
ST. CLOUD FIRE
CONTINENTAL
DAVIS
AUDIO
ITEM
AMOUNT
EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT
SAFETY
ELECTRONIC
COMMUNICATION
(2) Chemical Suits
$2,000.00 1/
$1,085.00 ea.
No price yet
--
--
--
(1) Deluge Gun
2,000.00
1,475.00
$1,365.00
--
--
--
(2) Helmets
300.00
30.00 ea.
30.00 ca.
--
--
--
(3) Boots
225.00
65.00 ea.
65.00 ca.
--
--
--
(2) Smoke Masks
1,250.00
Unavailable
Unavailable
$ 620.00 ca.
--
--
(6) Air Tanks
1,125.00
--
125.00 ca.
210.00 ca.
--
--
(2) Hand held Radios
1,800.00 J
--
--
--
$1,622.00
$1,700.00
w/case 6 charger
(2) Pagers
800.00
--
(30) Pair Gloves
--
778.50
--
--
--
--
(30) Hoods
660.00
-•
--
--
--
TOTAL BUDGET AMOU14T
$9,500.00