City Council Agenda Packet 08-03-19811 AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
August 3, 1981 - 7:30 P.M.
Ma yor : Arve Gr im smo
Council Menbers: Dan slonigen, Fran Fair, Ken Daus, Philip White
Meeting to he taped.
Citizens comments.
1. Consideration of an Ordinance Amendment to Allow a Day Care/Nursery
School within an I-1 Zone and a Conditional Use Request by Pam Lin-
berg/United Methodist Church.
2. Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Develop-
ment - Jack Kornovich.
3. Consideration of a Subdivision of Property - Quintin Lannere/Charles
Soucy.
l 4. Consideration of a Resolution Calling for the Sala of General Obligation
Improvement Bonds for 1981.
5. Consideration of a Resolution Amending the Commercial Development Revenue
Bonds for the Medical Facilities Company Project.
5. Consideration of an Award of a Contract on the 1981-1 Seal Coating
Improvement Project.
7. Consideration of Improvements to 11SP's Ball Park Facilities.
B. Consideration of Approving Issuance of Sot -Up License to Monticello Rad
6 Gun Club.
9. Approval of Bills - July. 19B1.
10. Approval of Minutes - July 13, 1981.
Unfinished Business.
New Business.
J
Council Agenda - 8/3/81
AGENDA SUPPLEMENT
1. Consideration of an Ordinance Amendment to Allow a Day Care/Nursery
School within an 1-1 Zone and a Conditional Use Request by Pam Lind-
bero/United Methodist Church,
Mrs. Pam Lindberg proposed to open a nursery school (The Pumpkin Patch
Nursery School) in the lower level of the educational unit of the
Methodist Church which is located on Lots 8, 9, and 10, Block 19,
which is currently zoned 1-1 (Industrial).
Currently, the city ordinances do not allow a day care or nursery
school except in a residential area as a conditional use. At the
June 9, 1981 Planning Commission meeting, Mrs. Lindberg requested
that the Methodist Church property be rezoned from I-1, industrial,
to single family residential, in order that a conditional use could
be granted for the, nursery school. It was decided st that Planning
Commission meeting to hold a public hearing to consider amending the
ordinance to allow a day care as a conditional use within an 1-1
zon% rather than rezoning the entire Methodist Church property to
residential, since the entire block presently is used industrially
except for the church.
Mr. John Uban of Howard -Dahlgren s Associates, consulting planner,
has prepared a written report which reflected upon the possibility
of a day care/nursery school being allowed as a conditional use with-
in an 1-1 zone with strict conditions applied. Mr. Uban indicated
that it is Lecoming more customary to allow nursery schools within
industrial and commerical zones since many times larger industries
are now providing nursery schools or day care centers as a conveni-
enttu for their working parents. He also noted that the following
items should be reviewed in relation to a specific industrial zone
when considering a conditional uao request.
Whether or not the area would be more appropriately zoned to
residential.
Do surrounding industrial uses produce or use dangerous material.
Are general noiso levels appropriate for a nursery or day care
center.
Consideration of truck and train traffic in the area.
Is the fire potential in this area particularly high.
- 1 -
Council Agenda - 8/3/81
Is special emergency notification available to the day care
of any accident which might take place with such things as
stored chemicals like liquid propane, etc.
A valued judgement must be made concerning whether the child's
environment versus the industrial intensity can be brought to-
gether in a harmonious way to provide a good situation for a
day care center.
Presently, there are nine conditions attached to a conditional use in
a residcntial zone and it is reosmmenrlwi that if the ordinances are
changed to allow a day care center in an I-1 zone also, these nine
conditions plus the considerations mentioned by the city planner be
made part of the conditional use request in an I-1 zone.
^,L- Planning Commission at their last meeting in July, recommended
that the ordinances be amended to allow a day care/nursery school
within an I-1 zone and also recommended that Pam Lindberg be granted
a conditional use permit for the Methodist Church to be used as a
day care center provided that the entire playground area at the church
be enclosed with a fence for safety.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of an ordinance amendment to allow a
day care and nursery center within an I-1 zone with whatever guide-
line items deemed necessary and consideration of a conditional use
permit request by Pam Lindberg for a day care center.•
REFDRDNCES: The Planning Commission minutes of June 9,and July 14, 19 Bl,
and written comments from John Uban of Howard Dahlgren 6 Associates.
2. Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit for a PUD - Jack Kornovich.
11r. Jack I(ornovich has applied for a conditional use permit for a
Planned Unit Development within an R-3 zone. The k-3 zone upon which
he is proposing the Planned Unit Development is located between County
Road 39 and the railroad tracks on the parcel of land which lies between
Kampa Estates and tdorthern States Power Company's maintenance building.
According to our ordinancen, a residential Planned Unit Development is
alloe:cd asa condit:ianat ..ae in an R-3 zone, the zoninq of the proposed
parcel for this development. Enclosed for your reference is a pro-
posed lay out of the Planned Unit Development. It should be pointed out
that the approval of this conditional use permit would only be approval
of the general concept stage and prior to any development occurring,
it would be necessary for approval on a stage by stage basis.
•All variances and conditional use
permits require 4/51s vote of the
City Council for approval.
- 2 -
Council Agenda - 8/3/81
At the development stage plan, it would be necessary for the developer
to coordinate his plan with the city planner, city engineer, and the
city staff to review such things as sewer and water, main sizing,
street locations, etc., prior to any construction occurring.
Mr. Kornovich has determined that one apartment building and the ground
it sits upon and one enclosed garage unit, that is, six parking stalls
and the ground upon which that garage sets will be owned by one individ-
ual or group of individuals, and that all the yard and open areas includ-
ing the roads and parking lots would be owned in common by the Townhouse
Association which would make the determination of maintenance and the
decor of the buildings on the exterior and the upkeep of the grounds.
Basically, the Planacd Unit Development proposed would contain four
12 unit apartmont buildings with each apartment building being accompanied
by one G stall garage.
At the Public hearing held by the Planning Commission on July 14, 1981,
Marie Schanen, property owner in the Yampa Estates Development, which
lies directly west of this proposed development site expressed concern
about the possible traffic hazards that may occur from this development
having direct access to Yampa Circle, rather than their own access onto
County Road 39. It was pointed out to Kro. Schanen that it would be
better to provide access for this development onto Yampa Circle rather
than providing another access point to highly traveled County Road 39.
It should also be pointed out that although this development is being
considered a Planned Unit Devololoo nt, park dedication requirements
should be adhered to. The Planning Commission unanimously voted to
recommend approval of the conditional use permit for the preliminary
stage of the Planned Unit Development.
POSSIBLE ACTIO14: Consideration of a motion to approve or deny the
request for a conditional use permit for a residential Planned Unit
Development.*
REFRREUCES: Enclosed map showing the location of the area proposed for
a PUD and the proposed P11D layout pian.
3. Consideration of a Subdivision of Proportv - Nintin fanners/Charles Soucv.
PURPOSE: Ns. Quintin fanners recently purchased the north portion of
the Wayside Inn property from Kr. Charles Soucy and is proposing to
subdivide that portion of the property which he purchased into four
buildable residential lots.
'All conditional use permits require
4/5`s vote of the City Council for
approval.
3 .
Council Agenda - 8/3/81
Lot 1 would consist of 20,000 square feet and Lots 3, 4, and 5 would
be 12,400 square feet. Only Lots 1, 3, 4, and 5 would be owned by
Mr. Lanners with the remaining Lot 2 to he owned by Mr. Soucy as an
outlot.
As part of the subdivision request, Mr. Lanners is requesting that
the city waive all of the subdivision requirements such as street
development, soil surveys, park dedication fees, etc., and that only
the proposed new lots and lot lines be shown. As a result, Mr. Lanners
is requesting that this subdivision be treated as a simple subdivision
requiring only that the final plat be recorded as a new block and lot
numbers.
Although Lots 3, 4, and 5 meet the minimum lot width requirements at
the front of the lot abutting the street, and each lot exceeds the
minimum square footage of 12,000 square feet required, they do not
quite meet the lot width at the set back line which is required to be
80 feet. According to the preliminary sketch plan enclosed for your
review, the minimum dimension at the set back line is somewhere be-
tween 78.75 feet and 80 feet, being approximately 1S feet short of
the required 80 foot width. As you will note on the sketch plan,
the developer has shown the proposed location of future homes and
has indicated that he would be agreeable to stipulating that no vari-
ance request for side yard set back variances would be asked for in
the future.
4t the public hearing held by the Planning Commission on this sub-
division request, abutting property owner, Mrs. Jerry Peters, express-
ed concern over the size of the lots proposed for this subdivision re-
garding the width and depth of each lot. In addition, Mr. Bill Burke
who owns property across the street from this proposed subdivision
questioned whether or not those lots should be allowed to be less than the
minimum width of 80 feet. Both Mrs. Patera and Mr. Burke felt that the
lots in the general neighborhood all exceeded 80 foot width requirements
and were in the neighborhood of 100 feet wide and felt that the lots
proposed for this subdivision should also equal at least 100 feet in
width.
On a split vote, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the
subdivision requant ao prcoented with the approval of the Iota being
leas than 80 feet in width and recommended to waivo the subdiviriion
requirements with the exception that the park dedication be provided
in cash as required by ordinances.
POSSIBM ACTION: Consideration of a motion to approve or deny the
preliminary subdivision plan no presented. Motion should include
whether or not the subdivision requirements will be waived along with
a determination of whether park dedication fees will be roquirod and
whether a variance is granted for the lot width requirements.
-4 -
Council Agenda - 8/3/81
REFERENCES: The Planning Commission minutes of July 14, 1981, and a
map indicating the proposed subdivision site and a sketch plan of the
subdivision.
4. Consideration of a Resolution Calling for the Sale of General Obli-
gation Improvement Bonds of 1981.
PURPOSE: To consider a resolution calling for the sale of bonds for
the 1981-1 Improvement Project which served a portion of the Meadows
SuMivision and River Street from County Road 75 west approximately
1200 feet with sewer, water main, stone sewer and street paving, and
the 1981-2 Improvement Project which consisted of storm sewer and
street construction work along Cedar Street from ]curing lane to the
north right-of-way of Burlington Northern Railroad tracks.
The total construction cost for the 1981-1 and 1981-2 Improvement
Projects is estimated at $358,403, and along with an estimated in-
direct cost of 22 percent or $76,853.00, the total project cost is
estimated to be $437,256.00. Of the total 5437,256.00 estimated
cost of both improvement projects, $403,056 is proposed to be assessed
to abutting property owners with ad valorem taxes picking up approxi-
mately $34,200.00.
I have talked with King Forness with Springsted, Inc., our bonding
consultants, and he will be sending out the recommendations of his
firm which will accompany the agenda supplement and additionally,
there will be a resolution for the council to consider on this
matter calling for the sale of the general obligation bonds. The
bond sale has been tentatively set for September 14, 1981.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of adoption of a resolution authorizing
the sale of general obligation improvement bonds for the 1981-1 and
1981-2 Improvement Projects.
REFERENCES: Recommendationo from Springsted, Inc., and a copy of the
resolution.
5. Consideration of a Resolution Amending tl,u Cuumwtuiul Development
Revenue Bonds for the Medical Facilities Company Project.
PURPOSE: To consider approval of amending a previous resolution
adopted April 27, 1981, authorizing a public underwriting of the bonds
for the development of the medical clinic rather than by placement to
an institutional investor as a tax-exempt mortgage.
- 5 -
Council Agenda - 8/3/81
As indicated, the City Council adopted a resolution granting pre-
liminary approval for the issuance of 1.4 million in commercial
development revenue bonds for the Medical Facilities Company to
develop a medical clinic adjacent to the hospital. The resolution
adopted April 27, 1981, indicated that the commercial development
revenue bonds were to he issued and sold to an institutional in-
vestor as tax-exempt mortgages.
The developers of the medical clinic are now requesting that the
council amend the preliminary approval by allowing the partnership
to sell the bonds as a public offering to enable the project to
proceed since at the present time, it is not economically feasible
for the developers to find an institutional investor. As indicated
in the resolution enclosed, the underwriting firm of Juran 6 Moody
has indicated that they will be offering for public sale the bonds
that would permit this project to go forward.
Gary Pringle, city attorney, has been given a copy of the proposed
resolution and will have an opinion on this matter prior to Monday's
moet is:g .
In a recent conversation with idr. Tom 11cKeo, one of the partners in
the medical clinic development, he indicated that if this amendment
is approved by the city, plans for construction will begin sometime
during August.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of approval of a resolution amending
the previous resolution authorizing a public underwriting of the
bonds rather than by private placement as tax-exempt mortgages.
RCFERE14CF.S: A copy of the proposed resolution and a cover letter
from the developers legal counsel. in addition, Mr. Pringle's
opinion will be available Monday evening in regard to this mattrr.
6. Consideration of an Award of a Contract on the 1981-1 Seal Coatinq
Improvement Project.
PURPOSE: To consider awarding a contract for the seal coating of
approximately 51,000 square yards of street surfaces for the following
areas within the city.
Chelsea Road in Oakwood Industrial Park.
Sixth Street area lying south of the railroad tracks between
Elm Street and Pine Street.
Prairie Road along with streets in Anders Wilhelm and Salboul
rotates.
6
Council Agenda - 8/3/81
Bids for the seal coating project were opened on Friday, July 24, 1981,
at 9:00 A.M., with six bids received, ranging in price from a low of
$16,596.40 to a high of $25,428.67. An alternate was also bid, whereby
the city would be responsible for sweeping the streets after the seal
coating project is completed and the bids ranged from a low of $15,505.29
to a high of $23,705.80.
Public Works Director, John Simola, has been reviewing the bids and has
been contacting the references supplied by the apparent low bidder,
Allied Blacktopping. Mr. Simola will be making a recommendation to the
council at Monday night's meeting regarding the award of the contract.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of awarding the contract on the 1981-1
Seal Coating Project.
REFERENCES: A list of the bids received including the alternates and
a map depicting the areas proposed for seal coating within the city.
7. Consideration of Improvements to NSP's Ball Park Facilities.
PURPOSE: To consider a request by the Monticello Slow Pitch Softball
League for improving the facilities at the NSP ball park with black
dirt for their outfield area.
Brian Weiman, representative of the softball association, has indicated
that members of the association will he present at Monday night's meeting
to request the assistance of the city crew in hauling in additional black
dirt for the ball park field. It is my understanding from the conversa-
tion with Mr. weiman that the city would not be requested to actually
purchase the black dirt necessary for the improvements, but only to
utilize the city crew and trucks in transporting the black dirt that the
association would purchase.
POSSIRLP. ACTION: Consideration of request made by the softball association
regarding improvements to NSP's ball park facilities.
REFTRF,NCP.S: Specific written request enclosed.
- 7
Council Agenda - 8/3/81
B. Consideration of Approving Issuance of Set -Up License to Monticello Rod 6
Gun Club.
PURPOSE: To consider the application by the Monticello Rod & Gun Club
for the issuance of a set-up license at their establishment for steak
fries and other events.
Currently, the Monticello Rod & Gun Club has been issued an on -sale
3.2 beer license, but it has cone to the city's attention that during
the steak fry events that are hold at the Rod & Gun Club, liquor is
being consumed on the premise with the Rai & Gun Club selling the mix,
etc. According to the Liquor Control Commissioner' s office, it was
necessary to be a club to qualify for a set-up license and that any
establishment, whether private or not, would qualify if they met the
criteria. It is the opinion of the city after reviewing the matter
with Rod & Gun Club representative, Rob Klein,. and city attorney,
Gary Pringle, along with the gun club's attorney, Jim Metcalf, that
according to State Statutes, a set-up license would be required for
the steak fries put on by the Rod 6 Gun Club.
Although the requirement for a set-up license is not needed year round
by the Monticello Rod & Gun Club, but rather for a few steak fries that
they put on, the correspondence rocieved from the Liquor Control Com-
miesioner's office indicated that a act -up license could not be issued
on a temporary basis such as a 3.2 beer license. Any set-up license
would have to he for the entire full year. The Rod & Gun Club had
requested that the set-up license, if required, be prorated according
to their needs, but it appears that the city has no choice but to
charge for the full year.
POSSIBLF ACTION: Consideration of approving the issuance of a set-up
license for the Monticello Rod & Gun Club at an annual fee of $200.00.
'A
Public He_azinri - Rezoninq and Conditional Use Permit Request.
Me Lhodist Church/Lindberg.
Pam Lindberg presented her request for a conditional use and rezoning
of the property where the United Itethodist Church is located. specifi-
cally, that is; Lots 8, 9, and 10, of Block 19, of the original plat,
City of Monticello.
Planning Commission Minutes - 6/9/81
Mrs. Lindberg is proposing to open the Pumpkin Patch Nursery School
in the lower Level of the educational unit of the Methodist Church,
and in order to do so must have a conditional use after the property
is rezoned. Also, there would be the possibility of amending the
ordinance to allow a nursery school as a conditional use in an 1-1
zone. if a nursery school were allowed in an 1-1 zone as a conni-
tional ase, possibly some strict consideration :should be placed on
granting that nursery school as a conditional use in that zone.
Mr. Jim Ridgeway, owner of Wrighteo, stated his objection to the
possibility of a nursery school being located so close to hill plant.
He was concerned that small children might wander away from the
general area of the school and possibly become injured by the
machinery and hig trucks at the Wrightco Plant. Mr. Ridgeway also
felt. that the, zoning change request was not compatible to the gen-
eral zoning of the area.
Rev. DnuglGn Nicholas, pastor of the Ilethodist Church, was present
and exprusserl the church's views that they have a commitment to the
use of the church facility for tho community. He also stated that
the church is not interested in a permanent situation With the
Pumpkin Patch, but rather is interested in only a two to five year
intern project. with Pumpkin Patch until they can find a more per-
mainent facility.
As a result of the conversation between the applicant and the
Planning Commission, it wait decided to hold a public hearing at
the .htly 14, 1981 meeting,at which time considera%inn will be given to
making it nurne.ry school allowed as a conditional qse within an 1-1
zone, and placing guidolinen upon that use as a condit.ional use
within +rn 1-1 zone..
3. Public. ll,•arinq - Sidovard Set Back Variance - Frml Gulp.
Fred Culp, who owns tot 11, Block 3, Anduro Wilhui,m Cutaten, was
present to make, an application for a oidoyard variance of fuer i,.et
to allow a six foot sideyard Get back In an R-1 zona, where n ten
foot nideyard net hack io requirod. His requont for A sideyard unt
hack 01 lens than ten foot in similar to many oLhuro made in clic
Andern Wilhelm auMlivision which aro related to the property line:,
not Ininq at it right angle to tho ot.reet, thun, tho hasten Laho mntc
of the property than would normally he used Iec aura they ate built.
parallel to Litt) oLroet rather than being parallel to the aidcyar,l
property linea.
Planning Commission Minutes - 7/14/01
Basically, Lot 1 of the proposal is 20,OOo square feet being cvcr
100 feet in width and approximately 180 feet in depth and Lot n 3, 4 ,
and 5, although unusual in configuration, are 15 inches narrower
than ordinance requirements and are approximately 180 ' ect in dopth,
boinq of 12,400 square feet each. Lot 2 would be treated as an wivlet
with pousibiliLes of further development at some time in the fut-iirr.
A motion was made by Bondhus, seconded by Schaffer to recommend app.row,'.
of this suldivi^.ion request and to waive the eu),livision requircrt nt:,
with the exception of the lot width and roco=end that that lot wttit.h
be accepte4 with park dedication being in cash. Voting in favor w,:c:
Bondhus, Schaffer and Riagoway. Opposed: Martie. ALrtaininrl: Purkt,.
2. PublLc Hearin - Ordinance Anerulment - Pam Lindl !ZLPT,tt,•l MetL,xlt 1-
Church/City of Monticello.
At tl.o June 9, 1981, regular meeting of the Writicellu Planning rcn-
misnon, Pam Lindberg was prenent to request it conditional u�.�. .,nJ
rozoning of the property where the Methodist ChUrrh is located.
(Spvcifically, that is; Lots B, 9, and 10 - Block 19, eriginaL l.bit.
City o1 Monticello).
Mrs. Lindberg proposed to op, -n a nursery school. (The Pumpkin Parch turccry
Sclwel) in the, lower level of the educational unit of Lite :.ethortiat
Church and in order to do so, she must have a eonditiunal un! , vat i.tnt'e,
or wlattwer necer.sary requirement is placed upon that usn w) -ii:" I:. -
located in an 1-1 zoro. As a result of the public hearing of Jute 7,
the apl•licant and the Planning Commission agreed to hold a public Itoarin9
at the July 14, regular Planning Co mti,:sion meeting at which r -i -Tv ,•rn-
stderatiun would he given to making a nursery school a Condit it41a1 ucil
witl•in an I-1 .one and placing guidelines upon that conditiot,ai ur,
witi•in the I-1 zone.
At the July 14, noeting, cements were avallablc from Jotn Ubani t'ul:-
rosentativo from Howard Dahlgren Assxiatss, which refiectetl 111 -1 --ii t'3.a
pou,01,11ity of a day carr./nursery school Nein j allow,d as ,t r_r..rle,^lon�t
use tltthin an I-1 zone.
The Planning Commission, after much discussion amung rhe mambrrn .ici vitt,
people in attendance at Lite meetings decided upon n ordinance ,uu min, at
which would allow a day care;nursey school wit' in an I-1 zt,nc,. A t.tt.tiun
was nade by I1111 Burke anti rnronded by I d Sclmt far to adopt an t t I: r, moo,
ameniment allowing a day care/nurnory school within an 1-1 mon,, .:i• 1. thu
following ltoms being conevinw directly relatud to Lite r.peeifiL, It, .so ii,:t
in an InJust•riAl zonst
1. I'hether or not the area w. uld he more apprtq,riatoly zonctil to
residential.
o2
Planning Commission Mirutteu - 7/)-11/111
2. Co surrounding industrial uses proluce or use dangerrnin
rut tar is 1.
3. ghat are the general noise levels of the area? Would this:
noise level interfer with the normal operation of the day
care/nursery center. Are fumes or any other suhc.tances Lu::le
in thr air and is this area then appropr1atc for day carvJ
nursery center.
4. Consideration of thn truck and train traffic to determino
wl:c•ther or not thin in a safe situation in which to locate
a day care/nursery center.
5. 1:, Lh,: fire potential in this lsirtieular .arca high as iu a ,.oily
tl:e case in an inAustrial area.
6. is special emergency notification available to th.: day care
center of any accident which might take place with :urh Lhini .
an utored chemicals like liquid propane, etc.
7. A valuml judgement must be made conccrnit:l whether th.: Child'
environment versus the industrial intensity can be 1:raugl.l to-
gether in a harmonioun way to provide a gcud sil.uation lei ,k
day care center.
With riclgvway abstaining, the motion passed four in favor , n.l acro
agaitaL. An a continuation of the hearing rcgardJng Go ixt:lufbUit
of Lilo pumpkln :itch nursery being allowed in an 1-1 7.oaL a-1 a tot.-
diti�wl tire, a notion was made by nurke, necarded ty actn,thu; U, .at
the .an•litional use for thu Pumpkin Patch Iturucry School Lo be .a1lGivl-d
to t• locar,d at the Methoiiot Church propurty 1'ravided that tIu• Il,,y-
gro-trd area he surrounded with a suitable safety fen.o. Met,- vttra,d
in favor wore nartic. Burke, nondhns and Schaffer., with
abstaining.
3. Publ is dear+nn - Corrlitional Une - Jack Y.orn,wich.
Mr. .lack Rornovich has applied for a conditional use for a Plaraad
Unil "cvololritnt within an R-3 zone. The R-3 ::enc ul,m which 14•
propm"t.l tie, Planned unit Development in locatt-d bata,en Cuunty
Road in and the railroad tracks on the parcel of lan,l >.hluh list,
bett.•a n rw.ia ':t<oa and the Northern States Powtr 'trri'any'n mair.-
ten.ati.. Im 1diny.
D
HOWARD DANLGREN ASSOCIATES
mre, C— .
C1114:.0 1_rING P1 ON 1:r n:,
u.lr
MEMORANDUM
DATE: 8 July 1981
TOT Loren Klein, City of Monticello
FROM: C. .lohn Uban
RET Proposed Dayearc Center in an Industrial Zone
Daycare• renters are usually located in an area convenient
for worltiny mothers and fathers. The area needs good ac(:er,:s
for the dropping off and picking up of children and mu -;t b,•
close to points of work and neighborhood. Daycare centers
aro eit:icr built as new structures or adapted into exisLinq
structures such as churches, shopping centeru, or other
commercial buildings. Daycares can be found in almost any
land urs from industrial to commercial, and of course, j
residentia 1.
The following are some general considorationn fOL a
Conditir:nal u.^,o Permit for a daycare center:
1. that .Arc the surrounding land uses? To ldontify
those uses is important so as to dutormine the
compatibility of the daycare center with adj,)ccnt
unun ov neighborhoods.
2. whit is the use and condition of the property to
�lucut.ion? Is the building proposed to ho, a new
building or a conversion? 11ere we need to look
AL building r:odo compliance and gen«T:ai condition
at: prn1vorty as to upkeep, maintonanco, thinge
that might offer dangerous situationn for toddlorn
pl ayi ny or poor siLe distances for ad jarcnt. auuj
I, riff ic.
3. N-affTc ,Tnd access problems should bo looked at.
otslidten usually arrive by automobile and must
he abio to have good access to the property. h
f.Acility located directly on a highly traveled
road may have problems with ease of accous unl(I.
the ru.,,t is built in such a manner an to aecnn �..;.Its
atUitional traffic movements.
MEMORAIMUM
RE: Proposed Daycare in Industrial Zone Pag:, 2 a.
If children are to arrive on foot, pedestrian
access is to be looked at also.
4. Tho outside play facility should be large enough
to accommodate the number of children proposed.
It should be well built with a safety fence and
provido for a variety of activities. Includec[ ,u
the outside facilities should be ample screcninp
from adjacent prupert.ies. Another concern here
is havinggood air circulation, and ampio ncsu1L.0
lit; ht in the play area.
5. Pede:7Lri311 safety should also be addressed.
Sidcwalks should be of such quality as to penia
safe aveess by pedestrians to the site.
Pedestrian crossings for streets should also be
identified.
6. Adequate parking and drop-off facilities should
bu incorporated into the site plan. There should
Le enough parking for the employees and a propor-
tion of the parents somewhere in the range of
otic nt:all per five pupils. There should also l.c
a turn -around and drop-off area on th,2 :+ito to �.
facilitate the ease of parents brirnling thoir
children to the daycare center.
7. The site should receive .adequate huffcring anA
a saft.'Ly fence depending upon what hind of
neighl,twhoad the proposed daycare c:ntur is
li)cat.od in. Handicap ramps will also be nrcdrp
Nil iritis type of facility.
8. Them should be lighting on the exterior o! tho
buildin.l zor early morning drop-off and e-venirol
Dick -alis. Thin is especially important during
the winter montisa.
9. The faeility Should comply with state or county
standards and be appropriately licunned.
10. Por general inform.atinn, the trips gcnerate.l h;,
:,uch a facility wuuld be in the rouge of four
iutomobiY- truss per pupil. If thc• faciliLy hoo,
for ox.amplo, SO children you can roc.ct 200
autcr ,pile trips to be genorated I y the lnyc,s
crntvi .
0
e
MEMORAU DUM
RE: propose Daycare in industrial Zone Pace 3
The following items are concerns directed specifically at a
location in an industrially zoned area:
1. A question should be asked whether or not the
area would be more appropriately zoned to
residential. Are there residential areas
adjacent to the site and would the: zoning be
more reflective of the existing neiehborhonds?
2. I)o surrounding industrial uses prc,luce or use
danyer.ous materials? Here a survey of actual
operations needs to be made and d judcjeuent. of
appropriateness must be made.
3. chat are the general noise levels of thi, area?
Por instance, heavy industrial, trains, and so
forth. Would this nuise level interfere with the
normal operation of the daycare center? Alio,
ar.l fumes or any other substances toric in the
air and is thiu arca then appropriate for daycare
centors?
d. In an industrial area one must look at the truck
and train traffic to determine whotPo r or nor.
thin is a safe situation in which to Locate a
daycare centor. For example, what ;:inds of
materials aro hauled and is it relatively aafo,
i.o., derailed hydrous ammonia tank, or the
1+n:asibility of leakage frum radioactive
mnt:erinl can be qui.to dangeroua.
5. A Cire potential usually is higher in an
induntrial area and this situation should be
looked at carefully.
6. Special emergency notification to the dayc.irn
center of any accident must he arrr •aged for .
1•or L110tance, .stored chemicals like- 1 iquid
l)Cripa.it, can be very Clangorous and t-iergenc:}
operations need to bo spelled out 41A tv
511)cii'lvally.
7. A value judgement must be made cons.•rrninn
whotho r the child's environment verau s tht,
indrtutrial intenuity can bo brought together
in a harmonious way to provido a g -id s)tuat)ur•
for a tlnyeara center.
9
U REa .Proposed Daycare in Industrial' Zone Patan'n f
°) ll,
� o u
8. underrtafid the specific propoaal berore
the Cityi theie are some positive aspects in.
t that the proposal .is in an existing church d
across the street from a residential area. most, u
of tho traffic would approach through the
residential area keeping the character in tune
with the residential atmosphere of t:he daycar,.
= c.:neer. The great concerns then arc whr.ttier
or not these activities can happen appropridtuly i
in :in arca and on property that is :zoned
in�lust•rial.
Loren, if ycm have any questions°or need more spaci(ic
answers, please give us a call and we will be happy to
provide additional information.
o
1
sj
I
a_=
1 SIS
r
^I�ei'tlPs�'1
4e
tU�a'C.�„w,N�'L"�%�:. J� �`1� ".,irat�'�?.,. '�+.;�.•�r.� '`fit �'.`.,r�`1 ,t,� �-"`"'�� � `'•�~'u
-- V/Z
T � �4 re til j . f ' '^ `+r `• r.. w � s; ss ..`' �!
j_MrOHWAY
w
r` Tr N0. 94 1
ti �
A
1. Public fiearinn - Suhdivision of Property - Quintin tanners and Charlet.
Soucy.
Quintin tanners who has purchased the approximate north half of the
Wayside Inn property which abuts Sandy Ione, was present
to discuss his request for a subdivision of that property into four
lot,-. If that uubdiviaion request were approved, four new lots would
be created with a portion of the property being retained by Mr. Soucy
being an outlet.
Mr. tanners asked that the Planning Commissionwaive all of the sub-
division requirements such as street development, soil surveys, etc.,
and that only the proposed new lots and lot lines be shown.
Mrs. Jerry Peters was present and wanted to discuss the size of tilt
lots in question for this subdivision regarding the width and depth.
Al:.o, Bili Burke, who owms property across the ::treat from thio prurosed
subdivision,was present and questioned whether or not those lotr, rLould
be allowed to be 15 inches less than the 80 foot requirement and :tatc.d
that he would prefer to see those lots 100 feet in width, similar t„ the
width of his lot.
In the cane of the proposMi westerly three lots, til,, width of the fror.t
yard at the set back line is 15 inches narrower than the 80 foot ordir,nct-
ret;uires. The developer, however, has submitted an overlay onto tach
of the throe lots showing the size and configuration of the huuces which
are proposed for those lots. (The developer indicated at the n.-oting
that at least two of the proposed homes, as shown aro sold, contin,junt
upon the approval of this subdivision request). The reason the drvelcl•tr
ha: uhown tho overlay of the houses on these lots is to chow that houa^n,
whicl meet the minimum square footage requirements of the City of •tonti-
callolvan be built upon these Iota without any variances bein3 requires
for cit=hcr the dwelling or tiro garage. in thin :aso,the dove-lotorin
willintl to plata a covenant on the property stating that nn varian"c
should lit allowed for the dwelling or the gtrage.
-1-
Basically, loot I of the proposal is 20,000 square feet br.intj uvtr
100 fent in width and approximately 180 fact in depth and butt. t, 4,
and !i, although unusual in configuration, are 11 inches narrower
than ordinance requirementa and aro approximately 180 feat in ,lrI M.
hero{) of 12,400 rrttiarn feet each. Lot 2 would hn treated at, an rut lot.
wigs rosnibilitru of further development at. sore time in thu iuttiro.
A murinn wan mado by nondhus, seconded by Schaffo+ to reeommuml alIrov,t
of t'tis culrtivinion tequest and to waive the subdivision royailtt ,'Wi
wit's thin cxcuption of the lot width and recommend that that lot wittti,
be at cert -1 with park dedication tiring in cash. Voting in fav:,r c•a
Bomhl,un. Schaffer and Iti•t;Ioway. OppuseAr Martin. Atttainistgt forst.
2, Pohl :.r lWarWe, - Ordinance AmcMmsgs 14um LUrAhv /1
rq'nited 9otLt d.�t r
Chore^h/City r+f Yontienllo.
At the June 9, 19"1. regular meeting of Monticello Plannir.l r,sa-
aia :tern, itarn i InAherq was lueavnt to requert a ctnttlitional use &'J
roronine of tilt, property where the Methodist Church iu located.
(Bpocifically, that let Lots B, 9, and 10 - Block 19, original Itat
Cit., of Monticello).
t
"'�., Sid\�,,,• • ��.�', 3�e,• •1. ���� .,,. i'`--."' ,, / �O ` o �.�.� ;�'t
%^^��•'�+"ti�.I!°`..t�^ 7.. 'h`�=`"- I.._.._ t«tip',..,
.Lt^; ,. \, = r„`, J .h� � ,k �+P ,, i!t` ti :'.` ....,,•_ ..iia---- "-------.�. %��R'v. \ � •a "`.
Fri
•�`7�y`" +'-? ��„�' ;; -s--y'' tttaa� •�afiar+ti er�''...+t .•-+1]"t_`} t 1 ice`': + � c� � �L� �;,�
;'• a a•�.ya. r j ..� j• w" t`�t e t, t 1 + \ �° G t
s., •.-�;1��`~^y+.",.;,;.,;,_�i �� • Pit
•! iJ• =+;•' ., ,tom t � �-y..__....,.,,._ � tC
-!lA`' '"' .:PDA
�.. � ,�~=ti� Jr••r �/�+ � i�E'e.c,�L,.•.,•�' ayylt• �}y `'��,,..
,� " � ^ \\ '•:IG,t )}t.t `\'se•j4 "`.at'.J 4--•-..1' �J •• .— 4t J * i
•
r
_ ---- _
JJZ,400)
house � m n--2�, � W N t2,4,03 sq.0 12,.400 sp.h.
Block
33 53 33 r13 ? Ito 2
15
` One
Broadway
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF tIrF.TTNG OF T1113
CITY COUNCIL, OF THE CITY OF
MONTICELLO, M IMESO'TA
HELD: AUGUST 3, 1981
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting
of the City Council of the City of Monticello, M n�es`olEa, was
duly held at the City !tall .in said City on the 3rd day of
August, 1981, at o'clock -.M.
The following members were present:
and the following were absent:
Member introduced the following
resolution and Lnoved its arlaptaon:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC SALE
OF $490,000 GENERAL 001AGATION
IMPROVEML•'NT BONDS OF 1981, SERIES 11
HL IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Monticello, Minnanota, as follows:
1. It is hereby found, determined and declared that this
City should issue $490,O00 General Obligation Tmprovement Tiondn
of 1981, Series 73 to defray tho expense of thu construction of
variono improvotnents in the City.
2. Thin Council shall moot at the time and place
specified in the for,n of noricn hereinafter contained far the
purpose of opening and considering senled bids for, and Sward -
ng tho Salo of $490,0O0 General Obligation Improvement Bonds
of 1981, Series 11 of. said City.
3. The City Administrator is hereby authorised and
directed to cavae notice or the tine, pince and purposas of said
meeting to be published in the official newspaper of the City
and in Co:runercial 11est not loan than ton days in advance of
data of salo, as provided by law, which notice shall be in
sulutantially the form not forth in Rxhibit A mttachad hureto.
4. The terms and conditions of• said bonds and the sale
thereof are fully set fortli in the "Official Terms of Offering"
attached herato, as Exhibit 11 and incorporated herein by
reference.
The motion for the adoption -of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by member and upon a vote
being
taken thereon, the f0l-16w—iiT6--v;c—)ted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against no same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and
adopted.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
CITY OF MON'ricil-'j.w
1, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and
acting Admirtistrator of the City of vionticollo, Minnesota, DO
HE107BY CERTIFY that I have carefully compared the attached and
foregoing extract of minutes with the original minutes of a
meeting of the City Couneil held oil the date Lhcrein indicated,
which are on file and of record in my office, and the same is a
full, true rand complete tra. -.cript therefrom insofar as the
name rclatess to th--e propose(I nale of $490,000 General
Obligation Improvement Bonds of 19bl, Series B of the City.
%IXTNI:',SS my hand an such Administrator and the
official mens of the city this day of
1981.
EM
City Admintntrator
rx111111T A
NOTICE OF MOND SALE•.
$490,000
CITY OF MOUT.ICELLO
WRT(.IIT COMITY
MINNESOTA
Gri71{RAL ONLIGATiON Im pizovrMENT
BONDS OF 1981, SERIES B
These bonds will be offered ]Monday, September 14, 1901, at. 7:30
P.M., Central Time, at the City Hall, in Monticello, Mi.nncrota.
The bonds will be dated October 1, 1981 and inter.ent will be
Payable August 1, 1981 and semiannually thereafter. The bonds
will be general obligations of the Issuer for which its
unlimited taxing powers will be pledgee]. The bonds will mature
on February 1 in the amounts and yearn as follows:
$45,000 1983 - 1984
$50, OUO 1985 - 1992
All dates are inclusive.
All bonds maturing on or after February 1, 1990 are subject to
prior payment on February 1, 19119 and any interest payin-ot date
ther.eaf.ter at a price of par mill accrued interest. Scaled bids
for not less than $480,400 and accrued interest on the
principal sum of. ^490,000 will be necepted. 170 rate of
interest nor the net effective average rate of the issue may
exceed 128 per annum. An acceptable approving legal opinion
will be furnished by tiriggo and Morgan, Profcnnional
Annociation, of St. Paul and Minneapolis, 141nnenota. The
proceeds, will be unori to fi.nanca various improvements in the
City.
Bidders should be aware that the Official Terms of Offering to
be published in the Official statement for the Offering may
contain additional bidding terms and .i.nformntion relat.i.ve. to
the Innue. In tho Ovent. of a variance between statr_mentn in
Chia 170ticc of Build Sale arni natd Official Terms of Off-ertug
the provlsiono of thn Latter nhal.l be those to be complied
with.
Dated: Augual: 3, 1901 BY ORDER OF THE Cilry COUNC.CL
/s/ Gary Weber
City Administrator
y
1:xlIl11TT B
OFF ICTAL TERMS OF OFFERING
$490'"
CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
GENERAL OBLIGAI ION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1981, SERIES B
Sealed bids for the Obligations shall be opened by the City Council on tdlonday, September 111,
1981, of 7:30 P.M., Central Time, at the City Hall. Consideration of the bids for oward of the
Obligations shall immediately follow the opening of bids.
DETAILS OF THE OBLIGATIONS
The Obligations shall be doted October I, 1981 and shall bear interest payable on February I and
August I of each year, cormnencing August I, 1982. The Obligations shall be general obligations
of the Issuer for which the Issuer shall pledge its full faith and credit and power to levy direct
general ad valorem taxes. In addition the Issuer shall pledge special assessments against
benefited property. The Obligations shall be in the denomination of $5,000 in coupon form and
non -registrable. The proceeds shall be used to finance various irnprovements within the City.
The Obligations shall mature February I, in the amounts and years as follows:
$45,000 1983-i9B4
$50,000 1985-1992
The Issuer may elect on February I, 1989, and on any interest payment date thereofte: to prepay
Obligations due on or after February I, 1990. Redemption may be in whole or in i,..rt of the
Obligations subject to prepayment. If rc :emption is in part, those Obligations remaining unpaid
which have the latest maturity date shall be prepaid first and if only part of the Obligotions
having ocommon maturity date are called for prepayment the specific Obligations to be prepaid
shall be chosen by lot by the Paying Agent. All prepayments shall be a1 a price of par and
accrued interest.
TYPE OF BID
A sealed bid for not less than $-40,400 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of the
Obligations shall be filed with the undersignr:d prior to the time set for the opening of bids. Also
prior to the time set for bid opening a certified or cashier's check in the amount of $4,900
payable to the order of the Issues, shall have been filed with the undersigned or SPRINGSTED
Incorporated, the Issuer's Financial Advisor; no bid will be considered for which said check has
not been filed. Said check of 1hePurchoser shall be retained by the Issuer as liquidated domages
in the event the Purchaser fails to comply with the accepted bid. No bid sholl be withdrawn
after the time set for opening bids, unless the meeting of the Issuer scheduled for consideration
of the bids is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another dote without uwordof the Obligations
having been made. Rotes offered by Bidders shall be in irlegrol multiples of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1%.
No rate for a maturity shall exceed the rate specified for any subsequent maturity by more than
1%. No rate nor the net effective rote for the entire Issue of the Obligations shall exceed 12%.
Obligations of the same maturity sholl hear o single rate frorn the dote of the Obligations to the
date of maturity ondodditional coupons shall not beused.
AWARD
The Obligations shall be awarded to the Ridder offering Ilia lowest doflnr interest cost to he
determined by the deduction of the pioniuin, if any, fronn,or the addition of the: discount, if any,
to, the total dollar interest on the Obligations fro,n their date to their final scheduled maturity.
The Issuer's eornputation of the total net dollar interest cost of each bid, in accordance with
customary practice, ,.hall be controlling.
The Issuer sholl reserve the right to: (i) waive non -substantive informalities of any bid or of
matters relating to the receipt of bids and award of the Obligations, (ii) reject all bids without
cause, and, (iii) reject any bid which the Issuer shall determine to have foiled to comply with the
terns herein.
PAYING AGENT
The Purchaser may name the Paying Agent but shall do so within two business days after the
award of the Obligations. In the event of failure by the Purchaser to name the Paying Agent
within said time the Issuer shall do so. The Issuer shall pay reasonable and customary charges for
the services of the Paying Agent. An ailernalc Paying Agent me be named by the Purchaser in
the some manner as the principal Paying Agent is named, provided that there shall be no
additional cost to the Issuer.
CUSIP NUMBERS
If the Obligations qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers shall be printed on the
Obligations, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Obligation nor any error with
respect thereto shall constitute cause for failure or refusal by the Purchaser to accept delivery
of flee Obligations. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification
numbers shall be paid by the Purchaser.
SETTLEMENT .
1l1ithin 40 days following the date of their award the Obligations shall be delivered without cost
to the Purchaser at a place mutually satisfactory to the Issuer and the Purchaser. Delivery shall
be subject to receipt by the Purchaser of on approving legal opiniur. of Briggs and Morgan
Professional Association of Saint Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota, which opinion shall be printed
on the Obligations, and of customary closing papers, including a no -litigation certificate. On the
date of settlement payment for the Obligations shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds
which sholl be received at the offices of the Issuer or its designee not later than 1:00 P.M.,
Central Time of the day of settlement. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the
Obligations shall have been made impossible by action of the Issuer, or its agents, the Purchaser
shall be liable to the Issuer for any loss suffered by the Issuer by reason of the Purchaser's non-
compliance with said terms for payment.
At settlement the Purchaser shall be furnished with a certificate signed by appropriate nffict rs
of the Issuer to the effect that the Official Statement prepared for the Obligations did rr:t as of
the date of the Official Stotement, and does not as of the date of settlement, contain orey untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material tact necessory in order to make the
statemenls therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were mode, not misleading.
OFFICIAL 51ATEMENI
Upon request to the Issuer's Financial Advisor prior to the bid opening underwriters may obtain a
copy of the Official Statement, the Purchaser sholl be provided with 15 copies.
Dater) August 3, 1981 13Y ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/s/ Gary Wicher
City Administrator
Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the
City Council of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting
of the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota was duly
held at City Hall in said City on Monday, the 3rd day of August,
1981, at 7:30 o'clock P.M.
The following Councilmembers were present:
and the following were absent:
Councilmember introduced and read
1
the following written resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AMENDING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL
TO A PROJ17CT UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT ACT AND AUTHORIZING PUBLIC
UNDERWRITING OF BONDS
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by Councilmember , and upon
vote being taken thereon the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AMENDING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL
TO A PROJECT UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT ACT AND AUTHORIZING PUBLIC
UNDERWRITING OF BONDS
BE 1T RESOLVED by the City Council (this "Council") of
the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows:
1. By Resolution No. 1981-15 dated April 27, 1981 (the
"Resolution"), this Council gave preliminary approval to the Project
(as defined in the Resolution) under the Municipal Industrial
Development Act to be constructed by Medical Facilities Company, a
Minnesota partnership (the "Partnership"); referred the proposal to
the Minnesota Commissioner of Securities for approval; and author-
ized preparation of necessary documents.
2. Pursuant to Section 1.1 of the Resolution, the Bonds (as
defined in the Resolution) are to be issued and sold to an institu-
tional investor or investors as tax exempt mortgage and equipment
financings.
3. The Partnership has advised this Council that institutional
investment funds currently are not readily available and when
available only in a limited amount and at interest rates that would
make the Project (as defined in the Resolution) not economically
feasible.
4. The Partnership has also advised this Council that it has
received a firm underwriting commitment from Juran 6 Moody, Inc., a
municipal bond underwriter, for a public sale of the Bonds in an
s
amount and at interest rates that would permit the Project to go
forward on an economically feasible basis.
5. It is hereby found and determined that it is desirable
that Section 1.1 of the Resolution be amended to authorize a public
underwriting of the Bonds in order to enable the Partnership to
complete the Project and consummate the financing thereof.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Monticello,
Minnesota, the 3rd day of August, 1981.
Arve Grimsmo, Mayor
Attest:
Gary Wieber, City Administrator
c
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting
City Administrator of the pity of Monticello, Minnesota, do hereby
certify that I have compared the attached extract of minutes of a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City held on Monday, the
3rd day of August, 1981, with the original thereof on file in my
office, and that the attached extract is a full, true and correct
transcript of the original insofar as such minutes relate to a
resolution authorizing the public underwriting of the $1,400,000
Commercial Development Revenue Bonds (Medical Facilities Company
Project) of the City.
WITNESS My hand and seal as said City Administrator this
day of August, 1981.
(Seal)
Cary Wieber, City Administrator
-3-
MACKALL, CR ❑UNSE dt M❑ORE
..a•a L. •.t•fan
LAW OFFICES
e�[•yo ,wav eon I(i00 tCP TO—EW _
tf e
••acau.eo. ,21 SOUTw E,GwTr, 4TnC[T
L
IO+•o• r_eC� a MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA SS402 t•.0 c. •[ �[. ciao- �q ,e�
�•a�u •• July 14, 1981
[ so+
•ems.. eau
Mr. Gary Wieber, City Administrator
City of Monticello
250 West Broadway
Monticello, Minnesota 55362
Ile: $1,400,000 City of Monticello, Minnesota
Commercial Development Revenue Bonds
(medical Facilities Company Project)
Dear Mr. Wieber.:
Enclosed herewith please find eight (8) copies of
the resolution we discussed by telephone this date regardincl
the above. -captioned Project. As Z indicated during our
conversation, the enclosed resolution amends Resolution
No. 1981-15, dated April 27, 1981, granting preliminary approval
to said Project by authorizing a public underwriting of the
Bonds for the reasons moro fully set forth therein.
7 trust the enclosud can be acted upon by the city
council at its next regularly scheduled meeting to be held on
Monday, August 3, 1981.
Very truly yours,
MACKALL., CROUNSE 6 MOORE
By ���
Mar in C. ingbor
MCl:dlm
Enclosures
cc Thomas E. McKee (with encl.)
Gary U. Pringle, Esq. (with encl.)
Woodbury It. Andrews, Esq.
RID TABULATION
FOR
SEAL COATING PROJECT f31 -SC -1
FOR
THE CITY OF M0NTIC3LLC, MINN
Rid
Contractor Security
Bettor Construction
Allied Blacktoppiny
Duetcoating, Inc.
Bit=in�uv Paving
Melvin L. Almna
lit -Way Surfacing
l
Total Rid Altr,rnatr Al
.42 sal. yd. .3G --
24.119.34
20671,QQ__
.269
.27
16,59G.40
15,505.29
.407
.36
23,372.80
20,673.22
.4428
.4128
25,428.67
23,705.80
•------
.39
.05
22,396.53
2.871.35
.43
.36
24,693.61
21,622.26
1. .,, r" ` _ ,-- -. �. �•,��. r+ //,I'
_ �..• , ,.J A ' ;1 Jct— � 1 "`� "'•w� l.... J �"'V�� �.. _p`
'+..,,. � - ,tea , t ., -�t� . .J `J �� `�a.••� fi^�...�,� �'.-:-..: � 11(".'--..� '-•<. ,7 i
•,. e • �, l: Y�s•,t„`-.�N�` �f •� ... q �.. Y•••,"ti. ',,, ♦1. �p , :: ,` :-•:ft l' ~r .~�?. ,; ;y.•; �'?' ., �Y: �'' w ~� �� .'; }• K � �' `
.. i'w .y t. r�• ,, ` ,. Y.±. �•, _ � vas .� - y v 't' _ ; •_ ....i � �• I .l .
r V i+P. 1Cti �•zi • ,� ••JJ(( '•j )�) mal\ �:� 1 ♦q` . � �_ M � t• .!�
•i `t� o�°..vim �~ .. ''��+ ` r ., '�'• .�..�,�.;�i� �,..r , 'h +�•,� �.) �.,,, 9 e..
14,
rfRs 1'. ... '� a t\�v , . ..'F� T'1•"`.j ft`.i Y„\
4 7-
H i GH WAY
NO, 94
�•-•fit. }_`
S 1• 44
a
`, '\ _� t"`1,�� �1`�� �`�` ham... 1 � • r u I .. .. ' V
\ ../'��1+..+�_��'" • \ \\ ++`ttt- .. ' .•tet, .. G • ' �` F
i ti • +•''` i _.. v � '�.b �� it , • • • \
�. \ •��.'^� ..yam .• �=�::��P..1 1 �`�.r..+s'
•` \\ \� __ . tom.. \mow,•. �_ qtr'+t:"t`t.J �'„ ��f."4 '.^r;f•^�`:,'
el
ti vt
,'-1..._.y' ``. ` :K.a.nto�io•; at ~ : �'i : Sti" ZJ. ,'�`i\ .ic''��t'; ;z.!"� r i_
+,. �,t �„ \.iap .}: �f^: �� ` •'-4q: .nra. �'• 'ttla+t r.., nn'3: �•7
Honorable Mayor
City Council
Monticello, Minn. 55362
Dear Council:
Enclosed is the Sheriff's Law Enforcement report for the month of June, 1981. 544 hours
of patrol service were contracted for during the period in which the following activities
were tallied:
1 - Theft of flower pot 6 decorative milk can from residence - can spas recovered
6 - Thefts of bicycles - 1 was recovered
1 - Criminal damage to property - door kicked in - cleared by mediation 6 restitution made
1 - Criminal damage to property - window in residence broken - cleared by mediation 6
restitution made
1 - Shoplifting at Coast to Coast - apprehended 2 juveniles 6 warned 6 released them
2 - Theft of items from parked vehicle
1 - Theft of items from residence
1 - Disorderly conduct - cleared by arrest
1 - Theft at Freeway Standard - cleared 6 restitution made
1 - Burglary at liolker's Drive Inn - small amnunt of cash taken
1 - Burglary at Del's Service Station - small amount of cash taken
1 Criminal damage to property - rocks thrown through tent
1 - Theft of fishing equipment from vehicle
1 - Rnhhery at Poirier Drug - cleared by arrest
1 - Theft of billfold from purse
i - Attempted burglary of residence - no entry gained
1 - Theft of gas from vehicle parked at Silver Fox Motel
2 - Burglaries at Independent Lumber 6 Clow Stamping Company - small amount of change taken
at both places
1 Criminal damage to property - parked vehicle hit by another vehicle
1 - Vandalism - window shot by BB gun
i - Theft of payroll check - cleared by mediation 6 restitution made
1 - Aggravated assault - cleared by arrest
10 - Citations issued for worthless checks
1 - Arrest for sale of controlled substance
I - Arrest for disorderly conduct
2 - Arrests for selling beer to persons under 19 years of alge
1 - Arrest for assault 6 escape from custody
2 - Arrest for littering
2 - Arrests for possession of beer by minor
I - Arrests for bench warrants
-J
SA MI FF'NiY OFFICE
Courthouse — Wright County
BUFFALO. MINNESOTA 55313
James F. Pourers, Ch rel Deputy
Telephone 682.1162
_
Non -Emergency Bus. No. 682-3900
24 Hour Emaraeocy Teleohonn
TollFree 1.800.362.3667
%7„rro 473 2673
DARRELL L. WOLFF
a:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m.
alonuce11o29S2533
(panty Sherlll
Delano 9722924
cok, to 238-6454
July 16, 1981
Honorable Mayor
City Council
Monticello, Minn. 55362
Dear Council:
Enclosed is the Sheriff's Law Enforcement report for the month of June, 1981. 544 hours
of patrol service were contracted for during the period in which the following activities
were tallied:
1 - Theft of flower pot 6 decorative milk can from residence - can spas recovered
6 - Thefts of bicycles - 1 was recovered
1 - Criminal damage to property - door kicked in - cleared by mediation 6 restitution made
1 - Criminal damage to property - window in residence broken - cleared by mediation 6
restitution made
1 - Shoplifting at Coast to Coast - apprehended 2 juveniles 6 warned 6 released them
2 - Theft of items from parked vehicle
1 - Theft of items from residence
1 - Disorderly conduct - cleared by arrest
1 - Theft at Freeway Standard - cleared 6 restitution made
1 - Burglary at liolker's Drive Inn - small amnunt of cash taken
1 - Burglary at Del's Service Station - small amount of cash taken
1 Criminal damage to property - rocks thrown through tent
1 - Theft of fishing equipment from vehicle
1 - Rnhhery at Poirier Drug - cleared by arrest
1 - Theft of billfold from purse
i - Attempted burglary of residence - no entry gained
1 - Theft of gas from vehicle parked at Silver Fox Motel
2 - Burglaries at Independent Lumber 6 Clow Stamping Company - small amount of change taken
at both places
1 Criminal damage to property - parked vehicle hit by another vehicle
1 - Vandalism - window shot by BB gun
i - Theft of payroll check - cleared by mediation 6 restitution made
1 - Aggravated assault - cleared by arrest
10 - Citations issued for worthless checks
1 - Arrest for sale of controlled substance
I - Arrest for disorderly conduct
2 - Arrests for selling beer to persons under 19 years of alge
1 - Arrest for assault 6 escape from custody
2 - Arrest for littering
2 - Arrests for possession of beer by minor
I - Arrests for bench warrants
DARRELL L. WOLFF
County Sheriff
SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Courthouse — Wright County
BUFFALO. MINNESOTA 55313
Telephone 682.1162
Non -Emergency Bus. No. 682.3900
Toll Free 1.800.362.3667
8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. -
Sheriff's report for Juue, 1981, for Monticello continued:
5 - Animal complaints
1 - Littering
13 - Public nuisance or disturbances
2 - Traffic problems
3 - Recovered property
9 - Suspicious circumstances, vehicles
6
persons
I - Trespassing
3 - Annoying phone calls - I cleared
5 - Domestics
3 - Miscellaneous complaints
I - Detox
1 - Motorcycle complaint
2 - Indecent exposures
3 - Civil matters
1 - Prowler report
1 - Fireworks complaint
160 - Car 6 subject checks
52 - Citizen aids
49 - Motortsts warned
15 - Accidents investigated
31 - Traffic tickets issued:
3 - Driving after suspension
3
- Stop sign
2 - Improper registration
1
- Erratic driving
7 - Speed
2
- Open bottle
3 - Driving while intoxicated
1
- Driving after revocation
3 - Careless driving
2
- Over centerline
I - Failure to leave information
1
- No 2 wheel endorsement
at property damage accident
2
- Mufflers
Yours truly,,
Darrell Wolff. Sheriff
Billing: For the month of June, 1981 --
$
6,933.33
James F. Powers, Chief Deputy
24 Hour Emergency Telephonn
Metro 4735673
Monfiullo 2952533
Delano 072.2924
Cokato 2865454
TO rnembers cC
N, re q, 0 e, 4 A C, 4 T M7, u'l i tb""Ion
/zlern�rr
We A OMOMCAK W YOU L00A C43 CnP C
A;11'ni; f4e yc' dg2l"Nlf-
;Do to R,:y- I/a,, . CIC 7-,N t/#- ll"V
Poldy T YOM Cc n eve U5 1 L 0 AO LW
'can C11610l7t we -,-'6
el'll-rAs k mon'r(,i/c L -1-;f CJ t Udodd;
In U US, - -,,lne I e,(-74- 3 -/,)'1 X3.
yo--
,13r:c.n (,i,c/ ^/, -'r—le f j "'c
LIQUOR FUND
JULY DISBURSEMENTS
AY.CliNT
Old Pcoria Co. - Liquor
1092.45
Ed Phillip: F Sons - Liquor
2940.75
Wright County State Rank - F'WT - June
500.00
Twin City Wino - Liquor
704.18
Griggs, Conger ti Co. - Liquor
2133.96
Ed Phillips 6 Sons - Liquor
3067.65
M1J. State Treasurer - PERA
227.73
Johnson Brw. - Liquor
177.79
Twin City ',line - Liquor
1027.08
Griggs, Cooper n Co. - Liquor
4656.90
Cd Phillips 6 Sons - Liquor
4052.u8
Thorpe Dist.ribot.ing Co. - Beer
54Hn.3n
Old Dutch Foods - Misc. mdse.
192.01
Dick Beverage Co. - Beer, etc.
39111.G5
Jude Candy r: Tobacco - Misc. mdse.
50::.5;
Dahlheimer Distributing Co. - Beer
820^.97
Viking Coca Cola - Misc. mdse.
1038.70
7 Up Bottling Co. - Misc. mdse.
440.26
Strike 6 Spare Advertising - Adv. on score sheets at Joyner's
p,
nc)
Trushenski Trucking - Freight
298.55
Midwest Win,: Co. - Liquor
773.20
Day Dist. Co. - Beer
155.50
Grosalcin h•evurage - Beer
23171.611
A. J. Ogle - beer
532.70
Ruskin's ClacLric - R.:pairs
32.7!
Maus Foods - misc. supplies
2i:.
17
Yonak Sanit.aLiun - Sanitation Contract
69.00
Monticello'rimos - Adve1Li5i1)g
162.!,u
our Own Ilaedwaro - GO light bulbs
133.111,
Gtuys, Johnson n Assuc. - I.iquur audit
1771.0-
rJorthern States I'owe_r Co. - Utilities
Granite Cit.v Cash RegluLer - Paper for registets
55.41
COmminsioner ni Pervcnue. - Sales Lax - June
I 31Ut,.2:!
St. Treasurer - Social Security Cont. Fund - FICA - Jun!
384.21
Cd Phillip!,„ Srnu: - IA-I'?'1252.1,',
Old Peoria o - Liquor
418.64
Twin City Uino Co. - Liquor
1619.';4
Gritigs, Coapor ti Co. - Liquor
I 4'127.
1,0
Our Own I!ardware: - Batteries
14.
56
!Iridgewaterr Telephone - Te:lcphono
51.37
Elorth Cent -r.0 11u0,lic Service - "ao
6.I8
9t,n L-lco111) Tim,•n - Arty I. help wanLed ad
221�.00
Gruyo, Johnnnn I. Anror.. - Computes proconaing for Ray
73.56
nnnkcr'a I.il.e Inn. - Groutt Ina.
1U3.81
Firot NaLioi,al !lank of Mpls. - interest on Rev. bonda
4t25.uo
Payroll for .Junu
3172.1,1
TOTAL DISPUR!1ENENTS - .JULY I 584,1142.111
i
CENERAL FUND -- JULY
flexible Pipe Tool - Sewer jet machine
Gould Bro. r -hev. - Truck per bid of 3/9/81 - For dump tnte!.
1111. State Treasurer - Dep. reg. fees
Wright County State Rank - Investments
Wright County State Rank, - Investments
Monticello Dep. P.eg. - License and transfer fees for 81 Chev
U. S. Postmaster - Stamps
};tl. State Treasurer - Dep. reg. fees
Is. Jerry Wein - Ia s Vegas expense for Civil Def. - to bo
reimbursed by the Fed. Govt.
Country Travel Storr_ - Airline ticket for J. Plein - (reimb.)
Corrow Sanitation - June contract payment
Paul A. Laurence Co. - Payment 05 - P:94TP
Alpert Meyer - Sludge seminar reimbursement
Sean Hancock - Sludge seminar reimbursement
- VOID -
Jeff Bruska - Additional salary above CETA
Kelly King
Jim King
Bob Boedigheimer -
Brian Weiman
Janelle Martie
t.arlene Hellman - Dep. Reg. scminor
State Capitol Cr alit Union - Salary deductions
James Preusse - Cleaning City Hall
Arve Grimsmo - Mayor salary
Dan Rlonigen - Council :salary
t;rs. Fran Fair - Council salary
Mr. Ken Maus - Council salary
Dr. Phil White - Council salary
YMCA - Monthly contributlou for detached worker
- VOID -
wright County State Rank - FVT - June
Wright County State Rank - Investments
Mrs. Lucy Andrewu - In[. Center salary
Lucille Schaffer - Inf. Center salary
61ru. Mae Ward - Inf . Center nalary
Wright County St -ate Bank - Investments
;IN. State Troar,urn.r P1:IV•
- vulU -
Gamu Time - Tire swinge, park stoves
;:M. State Tree ;carer - Dep. reg. fnea
(,won Bateman - Animal Imp, expenuo
11. It. Cates Const. Co. - Payment #2 on library conatrucrion
Petty Cash - To re.imhurau petty Cash for mise. oxpenaoa
State Capitol (:rrdit Unieu -Salary deductions
Janelle Marcie - Additional salary above CITTA
Jim King
Brian Weimun
Bob Raligheimer -
.city King -
Jeff Bruaka -
( Charlea Plaltern - Summer hall) salary
64;1. Stato Trrn!iurcr - Dop. reg. fees
St. Treasurer - Socinl Sec. Fund - Monthly FICA
AMOUNT CIIFCK NO.
24 002 .00
14495
16100.00
14496
91.00
14497
50000.00
1449b
255000.00
14,199
5.25
14500
316.00
14501
72.00
14502
300.00
14503
322.00
3450.00
130963.50
18.15
74.37
53.60
53.60
68.00
88.On
121.60
66.85
43.24
67.00
180.00
125.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
235.42
3446.00
375000.00
90.00
42.75
87.75
425000.00
2110.75
281.33
336.00
567.5U
30417.00
39.14
67.00
54.32
57.76
44.6.1
50.2n
26.80
2G.80
305.50
110.00
3128.19
14504
14505
14506
14507
14506
14509
14510
14511
14512
14513
14514
14 515
14516
14517
14518
14519
14520
14521
14522
14523
14524
14 525
14526
14 527
14 528
14529
14 530
14 531
14532
1.1533
14534
14 535
14 536
14 537
14518
14519
14 540
14541
14542
14 543
14544
1.1545
1.1546
1.1 547
14 548
D
GENERAL FUND
AMOUI;']'
CIIFCK Nu.
Rea', Estate I,anager's Directory - BooklaL
I 10.00
14549
Gary Wieber - Mileage & mist. expenses 6/13 - 7/17
16.52
14" S
Wright County State Bank - Investment::
271989.75
_ )
Wright County State Bank - Investments
30000.00
145S2
-..untry Travel Store - Mast Theisen air fare to Las Vega:; -
272.50
L4553
reimbursotl by Fed. Govt.
Mrs. Mae Ward - Inf. Center salary
87.75
14555
Lucille Schaffer - Inf. Center salary
13.50
14556
Mrs. Lucy Andrews - Inf. Center salary
119.25
14557
First National Rank of St. Paul - Interest on 78 bonds
34179.95
14558
Fidelity Bank F. Trust - Interest on 71 bonds
3354.30
14559
Northwestern ?.at. dank of Mpls. - Interest on mist. bond:;
159283.85
34560
First Nat. Rank of Mpls. - Interest on 75 bonds
21801.25
14561
Smith, Pringle_ F Bayes - Legal for :.lav
540.00
14562
i•-Lite116 ---xy Iilx - l.emel,t for parKS
L)0.17
1476.1
Itobil Oil - G.- and oil
30.57
14564
OS14 - Eng. fees for 80 r. 81 Imp. projects
26237.12
14565
%•later Product:3 Co. - 3 hose vacuum breakers
30.54
14566
National Fire Protection - Code handbook
17.25
14567
Gould Bro. Chnv. - Move car in commuter parking lot
15.00
14568
Dr. Joel Erickson - Feb. - I•lay vet fees
165.00
145G9
MN. Planning Assoc. - Gtoup membership dues
•10.0U
14570
local #49 - Union dues
72.00
14571
Foss Electric Co. - Lights for mise. locations
301.92.
14672
Wright County Auditor - S police fines for June
563.25
14573
-VOI:? -
--
14574
Ia eco Business ProduCLS - Paper a repairs to copy machine
179.40
14575
,'Nus Foods - Dog foc•I and coffee
37.96
14
?taus fire Service - Repair tire on It,t. Leuck
11.00
/1
145r
Monticello Rotary club - Annual dues for G. Wiebe-r
129.00
14578
monticello Office Product❑ - Misc. supplies
153.03
I 14579
:Cult Douglas - Rcimh. for supplies purchased for Fire U,:pt.
7.29
14580
Our Own Hardwar.) - '.isc. nupplies - jig snw, paint, etc.
372.89
I 14581
Wilhelm's Trce Service - Stump removal in Ellison park
40.00
14582
Feed RiLe Controls - June Lcuting
105.UU
14583
Glass Hut - Mirror for (lint. Bldg.
12.44
1 34584
North Central Public Service - Utilities
64.62
14565
wulhLoll Abetl.ccL Co. - TSLlo search for vacaUxl aLU.
48.00
14566
Hoglund nun Cr.. - Repairn to sower jot truck
456.•15
14587
Rig lake Lumber - Lumt:cr for picnic tables
97.75
14588
Olson Electric - St. lighL and pump house repairs
292.82
14569
Pyle Backhoo - Satellite rent.nl 6 mist. digging
1407.50
14590
Figs It Shop - ur:,.d trimmer replacement line.
2.98
14591
Monticello Printing - S/W postala, bus. cardu ISimola), et.c.
229.15
14592
Chapin Publishing Co. - Ariv. for bids - 61-1 b 81-2 Projecta
87.36
14593
Northern StaLen Pow,:' - ULilicicu
34H4.27
11594
Independent Lumbar - Minc. supplies
3.1.64
1.1595
Central MCGowa:1 - Cyl. rental charge
2.40
I 14596
Lindberg Sod - Sort for parks
16.00
I 14557
C.trlson Welding - 220 of l" uhaft
11.0014598
Harry's Auto Supply - Tool set, wrench, spark plugs, etc.
110.51
I 11599
Coast to Coast - Paint, nhovol hnndla, thinner, etc.
168.21
1.1600
Howard Dahlgren A-.:Soc. - tug. with L. Klein F. M. Wolters
35.00
1 14r JJ
Leef Bros. - lAun,lry
100.30
1.11-1
Sherburne County Equip. - Rainbird Sprinklor
03.53
14603
Century laboratoricu - Vandal R for parka
76.20
14604
Centra Sota - Sced and f.,rtilitter ^
290.51
14605
GENERAL FUND
I
AMOUNT (:Illi(,[(
No.
O. K. Hardware - Wwn mower, scythes, gas can
365.47
14606
C Auto �n Indu:;tries - Repair to reservoir 6 pump house control;
2423.00
14607
Squitable Life Assurance - Group Ins.
80.00
14608
Monticello Times - :lire. printing
1045.98
14609
Fire Safety Products - Add . balance on chemical suits
442.60
14610
Davis Electronic - Batteries, 2-way radios, carry cases
1700.41
14611
Moon Motor Sales - J. D. mower blades, soap for press. washer
45.30
14612
Mc Enary, Krafft, Birch 6 Kilgore - Architect fees - LiTira ry
844.90
14613
Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone
591.39
14614
Monticello Township - Local Govt. Aid - 2nd qtr. payment
1800.05
14615
Vance's Service Center - Cas Fire Dept.
22.00
14616
Gruys, Johnson & Assoc. - Computer processing for May- 80 audi-
8288.00
14617
a.,r..,r:e t.:. T" - r..n,.,. ,n^.
1784.17
14618
Hardrives, Inc. - Paving commuter lot
26072.22
14619
Flexible Pipe Tool - Sewer rods for sewer rodding machine
489.85
14620
Lindberg 6 Sons - 3 gal. paint, drop clothes, masking tape
44.92
14621
Northwestern Bell - Fire Phone
25.24
14622
The Plumbery - Repairs at Ellison Park
20.49
14623
Minnesota Fire Inc. - 2 fire hose adapters
31.11
14624
Lawton Printing - Uniforin building code forns
5.27
14625
1,oren Klein - Mileage April - July
317.17
14626
M. Berger Co. - 2 hoses r.l. adaptors for Fire Dept.
206.45
14627
Revenue Sharing Advisory Service - [landbook supplements
55.00
14628
Phillips Petro. - Gas And oil
73.83
14629
-VOID-
--
14630
_VOID-
--
14631
.]can Brouillard - Dieuel f ual
594.50
14632
Gordon Link - Can
2143.75
14633
_Vo: D-
--
14634
Fairs Garden Canter - Cyclone scoder
39.95
14635
Rich Wolfstallor - nileage
30.00
14636
Hen Franklin - 3 nnh trays
1.95
14637
State Tr,asur.:r - Surplus Property Fund - Misc. m,pplics
20.65
14636
Wright County Sheriff - Police contrnet
6933.33
14G39
Paul A. fauronco Co. - Payment #6 on t%UTP
993,55.50
14640
Vic Delmart ;tamp Compnny - Dep. Puy. snpplh,n
21.90
14641
Hrentoson Construction - liowliny house demolition
26%u.00
14642
Trueman-Wultern - Cub mawor repnirn
91.`
14643
Aubol T. V. & App. - Air condtionor for mice. building
395.00
14644
Big Lake Machine - Bobuild sbaLt.
5.00
1.1645
League of MN. Cities - Seminnr reg, feu for Rick W.
8.00
1.1646
Audio Communient.iona - Hadio repalr s antennn
22.50
1.3647
P..yroll for June
19
SUBTOTAL D1SDl11LSEMENTS - JUIN
i
$2,05R,146.77
'+'• State Treasurer - Wnt.��rcralt Rrceiptn #635957 that 635967
123.00
1.1648
Ceagun'o Pine Indge - Civil Dalonno
50.00
14649
Dept. of lievom.•r-Solea 6 then Tax Div. - Sales TAX Pay. 2nd qtr.
'14.44
14650
Mn. Dept. of Nov.-Cummiuniuner of kevunue - SWT June 19111
1,429.16
14651
Hrent.oaon Construct.lon - Capping Off waterline 0 Dowling Prop.
105.00
14652
' Monticello Fir,, Department. - Fira Dept. Salaries 6/16 thru 7/17
'162.00 i
14653
( _ Wa,.ertowar Pain: r. hepair Co. - Maint. Contract ending 8/15/Bl
727.00
14654
Drew Chemical Corp. - 55 gallons - Drow Floc 02270
895.80
14655
1.111. Business Journal - (S) page Ad.-ChamMr Diacouut - 2%
720.30
14656
Wayne's Rod Owl - Coffoo
202.51
14657
.]lm King - Add'l. Pay nbov.o Tri-Cap
AB. 00
14658
}telly King-"
57.60
14659
nob Boodighoim„r - Adrl'l. PAY abovo I'ri -anp
B11.00
14660
I
CJi\BRAL FUND AMf11INT CHECK IM.
Brian Weiman - Add' 1. Pay above Tri -cap 121.60 1.1661
Jeff Bruska - Add' I. Pay above Tri -Cap 53.60 146r /
Charlie Walters - Salary 364.45 14,'- J
Corrow Sanitation - Contract July 1981 3,450.00 1.1664
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS FOk JULY $2,067,180.23
-4-
J
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICFLLO CITY COUNCIL
July 13, 1981 - 7:30 P.M.
Members Present: Arve Grimsmo, Fran Fair, Kenneth Maus.
Members Absent: Dan Blonigen, Phil White.
1. Public liearing on the Consideration of a Resolution Approving Tax-
Exemnt Mortgage Revenue Bonds for Monticello Associates.
Monticello Associates, a general partnership consisting of Leon
Martin and Joseph CaFromboise, requested that the city approve a
resolution for the issuance of $575,000.00 in tax-exempt mortgage
revenue bonds to cover most of the cost of a proposed office and
warehouse complex planned at the intersection of Washington Street
and During Lane.
A proposed building would consist of 25,140 square feet of office
and warehouse space that would be leased to tenants during Phase I
of their proposed two stop developnent plan.
The proposed break down on the project cost i.s as follows
1 TEM AMOUNT
Land Acquisition and Site Development $ 75,000.00
Construction Contracts 474,000.00
Architectural and Engineering Fees 10,000.00
Legal ices 20,OUO.00
Interent During Construction 35,000.UO
Contingencies 12,000.00
Financing Fees 20,000.00
564e,OOO.00
It was noted t.hat as with past issues of thin na w re, the tax-
exempt revenue. bondo do not Leconte a liability of the cit.y should
the (articular cunpany rot be able to make their paymentu.
Nearing no opposition, motion was made by Fair, seconded by Maus and
unanimously carried to adopt. a resolution approving the issuance of
$575,000.00 in tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds; for Monticello
Association. (Sea Resolution 1981-26)
2. Ouar'torly Dciartr^nt Heed Mcotinq.
A quarterly department head meeting was hold by the council with the
following department heads in attendancet
1 I O
Council Minutes 7/13/81
Public Work; Director - John Simola
Building official/Civil Defense Director - Loren KLein
Senior Citizens Director - Karen Hansen
Fire Chief - Willard Farnick
.fright County Sheriff Representative - Buddy Gay
YMCA Detached Worker - Mike Melstad
City Administrator - Gary Wicber
Public %lork.s Director, John Simola, noted that during the first week
of tagging of Dutch elm disease trees, approxi.rnawly 60 trees were
tagged to be cut.
In regard to the Commuter Parking Lot at the intersection of Hwy 25
and I-94, Mr. Simola will be checking into the possibility of installing
a weather Sheller and possible telephone al. tLc cdnnlut`l lot.. In
addition, Mr. Simola was requested to check into the possibility of
erecting some kind of community bulletin hoard that coulc3 be located
also within the commuter lot compound.
Iluildinq inspector, laren Klein, noted that a r. -cent survey has been J
completcd concerning areas of hlighl within the City uuc!a as weeds,
unrcgistrred vehicles, vacant houses, etc., where the property owner::
will be requented to clean up their properties , cic.
Senior Citizens Director, Karon Ilansen, noted Vot now with the :nfor-
mation Cantor tieing hOuaed in Ute Ilintorical Building, that her signs
should he erected poosibly it block or so before the information C.:ntcr
to give vacationers and intereated people advu nco notice that an Infor-
mation Center is located within t!onticelln.
Fire Dcpartmont Chief, Willard Farnick, and joint board member, Lmo
Trunnell, said the fire department'a Lager syst,• is nt.i.11 nut working
correctly in that many of the fico department m.ml-ero are not gett.inq
notified ill case of fires. etc. Previously, Wrigl:t Cuutity,which o•wnv
the antenna r.^nding units, moved th(! antenna t'o a new location but
this has not solved t.ho problem. It wan suggeuted by council memb.-t!)
that pounibly a meetinq be Set up with tho county !ward and th.e city
administrator along with fire department. teprosont.ativec in an efiott
to solve the pager problem.
Cright County Sheriff representative., Deputy Buddy Gay, Y:1CA Youth
Coordinator, take Melutdd, and City Administr•cator, Gary Wicber, al::o
dineunaod problem areas with the Council.
j
Council Minutes 7/13/81
3. Consideration of Appointment of Commi Ltee and Altorncy for Union
Ncgot iat ions.
The purpose of this item was to consider appointing a union nego-
tiating committee and an attorney for union negotiations r.elativt!
to amployces within the Public Works Department who are represented
by Local 49 International Union of Operating Engineers.
The union contract with the city is currently effective until
Aril 1, 1982, lout union representatives have already presented
detailed demands for the next two year contract.
It was noted that although discussions on the union's wage demand:;,
etc., would probably not take place until the first part. of 1982,
it was recommended that the negotiating committee members le appointed
along with the authorization to use Mr. Mike O'Connor as the city's
attorney in any future union negotiations.
A motion was made by Fa'' -r, seconded by Grimsmo and unanimously carried
to appoint council members, Phil White and Ken Maus. to reprusenl the
Cit; of nonticello in the union negotiating committee and authori c
the use of attorney, Mike O'Connor, during the anion negotiations as
ncedod .
4. Consideration of Amendinq Monticello Ordinance Relative to Building
Permit Fees.
In the past it has leen Monticello':: policy Lo recover Lhe couL of its
building inspection program Lhrough fres charged for building pormitu.
Durinrl the last two and a half years, the revenue in the lrtilding in-
spection deparLme t has fallen approximately 35 percuuL short of Lho
experlitures. As a reault, it was recommended that Lhe building per-
mit foea he increased approximately 35 percent in an effort. to make
the department. self sufficient.
Mnntice.11_o has adopted the m0 form Building Ccxln and while this r-1+
contains a peril Cee schedule, the city it; allowed to adopt i06 own
fec schedule.
The proposed new fw� nehedule for the. City of Monticello which includes
a 31, percent increase would fall in between Uw present. city fee achu-
dule and the recommended Stale fee Schedule. Por example, fused on a
$50,000.on value home, the city'❑ C1.11 -runt. fee ::ehedule requires a
permit leo of 5187.00 eumpared to a proposed now uchedule lou of $252.45.
Ilowuvcr, if the Staten Suggested feu uehthiulo were uned, tho fee would
he $293.011 plus a plan checking fee of 65 percent for a total of $466.95.
In AddiLion, Wren Klein, Building official, recommended that the City
of Monticello charge a naninal amount. for Lila actual permit iLoelf,
for example, 51.00 and Lha rest of the, fee involved could be called a
land una fee similar to LhaL used by Wright. County's nchedulo.
Council Minutes 7/13/81
In this way, an applicant would not have to pay a surcharge fee of
$.50 per thousand but would only be required to pay a surcharge
fee of a flat @.50 per permit.
Motion was made by Pair, seconded by Maus and unanimously carr -marl
to adopt the now proposed fee schedule for building permits as
recommended with the actual building permit fee to be 51.00 plus
the balance of the proposed schedule to be called a use fee to be
effective September 1, 1901. In addition, Ordinance Section 4-1-4
relating to permits and inspection fees shall baa amended to indicate
that all toes snail be estanllsneo by the City Counrlt ratner tnan
spelled out in the ordinance. (See Ordinance Amendment 7-13-81 N104
and supplement 7-13-81 41)
S. Approval of Minutes.
Motion was made by Maus, seconded by Fair and unanimously carried
to approve the minutes of the regular meeting h,!1d June 22, 1981
and the special meetings held June 13 and June 29, 1981.
G. Chanqe of Council Meeting Date.
Due to the possibility of not. obtaining a quorum i -t the next n:gular
scheduled council meeting to be hold July 27, 1981, a motion was
made by Maus, seconded by Fair and unanimously cat ried to set laonday,
August 3rd, 1081, an the next regular scheduled council meeting date -
which would combine and reschedule the July 27, at:d AugusL 10th,
meeting into the August 3rd, 1981 date.
In addition, a special meeting wall tcnLaLively not for July 27, 1981
to possibly award a contract for seal coating.
meeting adjournod.
Rick Wolfstelje.r
Auulotant Adm nintrntor
J