Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 11-24-1980AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL November 24, 1980 - 7:30 P.M. Mayor: Arve A. Crimsmo Council Members: Dan Blonigen, Fran Fair, Ken Maus, Phil M9iite. Meeting to be taped. Citizens Comments - 1. Consideration of Conditional Use Permit and Variances for the Rivercreat Christian School. 2. Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit Request - First Baptist Church of Monticello. 3. Consideration of Rezoning Lots - Riverwood Estates. 4. Consideration of Additional Compensation for Viking Pipe Service for Sanitary Sever Cleaning on River Street from New Street to the y' Wastewater Treatment Plant. a_ 5. Consideration of Sale of Sludge Truck to Paul A. Laurence Company. 6. Consideration of Ordering the Preparation of Plans and Specifications and Salvage Method - Oakwood School. 7. Consideration of Appointing a Person or Persons to Serve on the Regional Hazardous Wasto Criteria and Siting Com,ittee. 8. Approval of Bills - November 1980. 9. Approval of Minutes - Regular Meeting of November 10, 1980. Unfinished Business - �h . New Business - 0PyV 0 Council Agenda - 11/24/80 AGENDA SUPPLEMENT 1. Consideration of Conditional Use Permit and Variances for the Rivercrest Christian School. PURPOSE: To consider a conditional use permit for the Rivercrest Christian School to allow a residence to be used as educational classrooms, and consideration of variances from the sideyard setback provisions along with variances from the City's ordinance requiring parking lots to be hard - surfaced with a continuous concrete curb barrier. At the time of advertising for the conditional use for Ery Radunz and Terry Mick's conditional use to build two 18 -unit apartment buildings in Lauring Hillside Terrace, it was brought to our attention that the Rivercrest Christian School had moved students into the house adjacent to the Assembly of Cod Church to the west. This information was brought to our attention by one of the people receiving a conditional use hearing notice. Basically, what has happened, is that the administration of the Rivercrest Christian School, knowing they needed more room to expand their educational classrooms, chose to expand into the house to the west of the Assembly of Cod church which they already owned. They did not, apparently, know that the school's expansion would require a conditional use, as provided by Monticello ordinance, in order that they might expand. i According to Monticello ordinances, it is necessary for a private educa- tional facility to obtain a conditional use permit in an R-2 zone. Accord- ing to the provisions of the ordinance for conditional use permits for private educational facilities, sideyards shall be double that required for the district, but no greater than 30', screening from abutting residential uses and landscaping is to be provided, and parking is to be in compliance with Monticello City ordinances. Additionally, the criteria used for any conditional use permit, according to our ordinance, should be based on the following: A. Relationship to municipal comprehensive plan. D. The geographical area involved. C. Whether such use would tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. D. The character of the surrounding area. E. The demonstrated need for such use. - 1 - • Strc it LiNr,scA r�}ngc�yP.�o To q No -Ar, ..4✓, D.8, Pl a,,�,c..�.1 0 t r rY s h..1.L n,*T ,vc u s EA NJ p QT G c.. T su., Tb p B T e. -%—,WOE (/�w � ..%� .s /J it �.0 47t ...1.+�Of✓,sGI, J • ,! ��+�-C �-.-.•tie.-C �q... K .a/.rw A Nn S «9 Council Agenda - 11/24/80 Since the existing house in which the classes are going to be held was in place prior to the zoning, it may be difficult to meet some of the con- ditions of a conditional use for an educational institution in an R-2 zone. They include doubling the sideyard required for the district, but no greater than 30'. Adequate off-street parking is available on the property between the house and the church; however, it is not hardsurfaced, nor does it have a continuous concrete curb around its perimeter. Additionally, there is no screening currently existing from the abutting residential uses. Our zoning administrator met with Mr. Gahart Decker, a representative of the Rivercrest Christian School, and toured the dwelling in which the classes are being held. There would be some building code requirements to upgrade portions of the dwelling, should permission be granted to continue the educational use within that residential facility. Mr. Decker stated that presently they are in the planning stage for an addition to the Assembly of God Church/Rivercrest Christian School, but that it would be a few months more before final plans would be ready to be submitted at a conditional use hearing. Our Building Inspector is also meeting on Friday, November 21, 1980, with a representative from the State Fire Marshall's office to review the building to make sure it is in compliance with the State Fire code. Enclosed, you will find 100 signatures that the Rivercrest Christian School has obtained, including sixteen who they indicate live in the ares. Addi- tionally, you will find two items of correspondence in opposition to the request from Mr. b Mrs. Ifedtke and Mr. b Mrs. Lyle Klatt, and an item of correspondence in favor from Mr. b Mrs. Richard Rasmussen. Additionally, at the Planning Commission meeting (see copy of the minutes enclosed) there was testimony in favor and in opposition to this particular request. The main area of opposition focused on the lack of playground facilities that the School itself had and control of the kids from wandering onto private property. However, it should he pointed out that the concern expressed in opposition would still be prevalent regardless of the fact that the School is now applying for additional facility to use no educa- tional facilities. PLANa1NG C')MMISSION RECOMMENDATION: After the conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission, at their last meeting, voted unanimously to recommend approval of the conditional use permit and variances until June 1, 1981, which would in effect allow the School to develop a plan to better control the children in the area and keep them from going onto pri- vate property. At the conclusion of this period of time, the Rivercrest Christian School could reapply for a permanent conditional use permit. In this way, the Rivercreat Christian School would be allowed to finish out the School Year at the present facility and give them a further opportunity to resolve the problems brought out at the public hearing. It would be intended that if this matter is approved by the City Council, a public hearing be held for any extension or continuation of the conditional use permit to allow residents in the area input to determine the degree of success or lack of success the school administration has had with resolving the problem. '.sm Council Agenda - 11/24/80 POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of conditional use permit and variances for the Rivercrest Christian School. If a motion is made to approve the request, an indication should be made as to whether the approval would be a permanent conditional use permit or whether such permit would be reviewed and if so, after what period of time.* 4o giQ.ex REFERENCES: November 11 Planning Commission Minutes, Correspondence from Mr. 6 Mrs. Hedtke, Mr. b Mrs. Lyle Klatt, Mr. b Mrs. Richard Rasmussen and 100 signatures obtained by the Rivercrest Christian School, and map depicting the area. *Note: 4/5's vote of Council is required for approval of this item. - 3 - l Council Agenda - 11/24180 2. Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit Request - First Baptist Church of Monticello. PURPOSE: First Baptist Church of Monticello is planning to build a struc- ture that would house classroom facilities and bathrooms for Sunday School instruction. According to Monticello City Ordinances, a church, or church -related use, requires a conditional use permit. It should be pointed out that although there are obviously similarities, the request by the First Baptist Church is not exactly the same as that by the Rivercrest Christian School, since the useage of the educational facilities for the Rivercrest Christian School would be proposed on a daily basis, nine months a year. In 1979, a representative of the First Baptist Church in Monticello began plans and preparations for building an entire new complex for church facility on the site of the existing First Baptist Church, and utilizing the existing facility either as a parsonage or another possibility that was explored was the sale of the property for a duplex. However, since that time, available mortgage money has evaporated, and it was almost impossible for the Church, according to Reverend Oas, to obtain mortgage money. As a result, the Church is now considering adding an additional structure to the site, which would be a UBC (Uniform Building Code) approved struc- ture. Initially, this was understood to be n mobile home, but after some further investigation by Loren Klein, our Building Inspector, he determined that the building should not be termed a mobile home, since it does meet the Uniform Building Code, and according to the Uniform Building Code, a city cannot discriminate against such a structure. According to Mr. Klein, the building that is proposed would meet all building codes and fire codes for such a facility. Should there be any questions as to what does or does not constitute a mobile home, Mr. Klein would be glad to explain this at the meeting itself, or on an individual basis if you so wish. In addition to requests for the conditional use permit, variance would be necessary since the present parking lot is not hardsurfaced and it is not intended by the Church at this time to hardsurface nor put in a continuous curb barrier as required by the Monticello City Ordinances. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: At their last meeting, the Planning Commio- sion voted unanimously to recommend approval of the conditional use and variances requested. - 4 - Council Agenda — 11/24/80 POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of approval of conditional use permit and variances for the First Baptist Church. Note: in his November 5, 1980 letter, Rev. Oas refers to being allowed to use the present facility for four years since it would not meet the commercial code. According to Loren Klein, Building Inspector, there is no differentiation between residential and commercial code on this type of facility, and therefore, this item has not been addressed in the agenda supplement, since no renewal would be necessary.* REFERENCES: Planning Commission Minutes of 11/11/80 and letter of November 5, 1980 from Rev. Gerald Oas, and map depicting area. *Note: 4/5's vote of Council is required for approval of this item. 5 - c Council Agenda - 11/24/80 3. Consideration of Rezoning Lots - Riverwood Estates. PURPOSE: To consider rezoning of Lots 4, 6 b 7, Block 1, Riverwood Estates, from B-3 (regional business) to R-1 (single family residential), and also the rezoning of Lots 5 b 8, Block 1 as R-1 (previously the zoning line directed these last two lots, making part of these Lots R-1 and part of these Lots as B-3, and it is necessary to clarify the zoning on these two lots in accordance with the plat previously submitted. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS: Since the Planning Commission had previously approved of rezoning Lot 1, Block 2, in Riverwood Estates from R-1 to B-3, it was felt that this action would be consistent and compatible with the surrounding area. The only difference that the Planning Commis- sion recommended from the request was to have Lot 4, which is right across the street from the Lindberg residence, zoned as R-1 instead of B-3. In reference to this change from initial request, it should be pointed out that I have contacted Floyd Kruse, owner of the particular lot in question, to make him aware of the recommendation, indicating that the City Council will be acting upon the Planning Commission's recommendations at Monday night's meeting. POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of wood Estates, from B-3 to R-1, and Block 1, Riverwood Estates, as R-1 approval of the final plot and the preliminary plat.* rezoning Lots 4, 6 b 7, Block 1, River - zoning Lots 5 6 8, in their entirety, of Any action would be contingent upon final plat being consistent with the REFERENCES: Copy of proposed plat depicting area in question and Planning Commission minutes of 11/11/80. *Note: 4/5's vote of Council is required for approval of this item. - 6 - Council Agenda - 11/24/80 4. Consideration of Additional Compensation for Viking Pipe Service for Sanitary Sewer Cleaning on River Street from New Street to the Wastewater Treatment Plant. PURPOSE: To consider a request by Viking Pipe Service for additional costs incurred in the amount of $3,266.77 on the above -referenced project. John Simola, our Public Works Director, has reviewed the matter, and in an enclosed memo from John, he gives the background on the project. Briefly, due to an increase in the amount of debris in the line, mainly in the area east of the existing termination of River Street up to the Treatment Plant, Viking Pipe is asking the City Council to consider additional compensation. According to John, he feels that some additional compensation is warranted because of the unexpected conditions which could not be accurately estima- ted at the time. It should be pointed out that the two quotations received were from Viking Pipe Service for a maximum cost not to exceed $5,223.23, based on an $85.00 per hour charge for cleaning, and $75.UU per hour charge for televising of the line. Solidification, Inc. had a quotation of not to exceed $5,400, based on a $95.00 per hour fee for cleaning, and $99.00 per (tour for televising. To a certain extent, these quotations were based on the best estimate our Public Works Director had at the time in terms of the amount of the debris, which turned out to be underestimated, as indicalcd in John's memo. As a result of these factors, 1 believe the Council should consider additional compenention, but not to the tune of 1002 of the amount requested. It would seem to me that a more fair and equitable solution might be in the area of 30 - 502 of the amount requested. 11 should be pointed out that Viking Pipe Service did inform our Public Works Director at the time that there would be a coat over -run based on their per hour charges, but there was no real alternative other than to complete the cleaning of the line. Furthermore, it should be pointed out that the Council can adjust the compensation due to extenuating circum- stances, but is under no legal obligation to do so. POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of additional Compensation to Viking Pipe Service. REFERENCES: Viking Pipe Service has indicated they would be sending a letter and this will be enclosed if it is received prior to the agenda going out. John Simola memorandum enclosed. a erk - 7 - Council Agenda - 11/24/80 %— 5. Consideration of Sale of Sludge Truck to Paul A. Laurence Company. PURPOSE: To consider the sale of the current sludge truck to Paul A. Laurence Company, general contractor on the Wastewater Treatment Plant, responsible for sludge disposal at the time of construction, for $3,500 plus a concrete apron, valued at $500, to be constructed in front of the new pole barn building which is part of the Wastewater Treatment Plant updating. Enclosed you will find a memorandum from our Public Works Director relative to this item. Since the City of Monticello will not be responsible for sludge disposal during the time of construction of the plant, and that in addition, we will be receiving two new sludge disposal units as part of the Wastewater Treatment Plant grant which are expected to be received in nine months, it is recommended that this sludge truck be disposed of at the price indicated. John Simola indicates that the offer by Paul A. Laurence is more than fair and equitable, and felt that the City of Monticello would be hardpreseed to sell this unit for the same price. POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of the approval of the sale of this sludge truck to Paul A. Laurence Company for $3,500 plus agreement that Paul A. Laurence Co. would put in a concrete apron in front of the new pole building at the Wastewater Treatment Plant. REFERENCES: Memorandum from John Simola relative to this item. =zw Council Agenda - 11124/80 b. Consideration of OrderinpLthe Preparation of Plans and Specifications and Salvage Method - Oakwood School. PURPOSE: As a result of a request by Council Member Phil White, an inven- tory list has been made up of the salvageable items in the Oakwood School. At the same time , consideration should be given to having plans and speci- fications prepared for the Oakwood School removal. Inventory of Salvageable Items - Enclosed, you will find an inventory that Loren Klein has prepared of the salvageable items in the Oakwood School building. It should be pointed out that this list could have gone on for several pages, but these are the major items, and there may be a few that were missed. For your information, I have also enclosed lists of the items that the School will be keeping, which was part of the original purchase agreement. Additionally, they are going to be removing all old school pictures, etc. Salvage Rights Based on the inventory listed, the City of Monticello nay want to consider retaining salvage rights and having an auction prior to having a contractor come in and clear the facility. in order to determine whether this is cost-effective, bids could be received with salvage rights and without salvage rights on these inventory items so the City would know what amount of credit the contractor was granting the City, and could make a determination whether to sell these items separately. Additionally, there are several items in the building that could be utilized directly by Elie City of Monticello, either in rhe Pithlic Wc%rks area or the Fire Department. These items will be, removed prior to the bidding process. Demolition Process - Plans and specifications should be prepared by our engineer for the demolition and clearance of the property, since State Statutes require bids to be let on this project. It would seem that the City of Monti- cello is ready for a motion, at Monday night's meeting, to have our engineer conanenee preparing plans and specifications. in December of 1979, 1 received an estimate from Carl Bolander, of Carl Bolander 6 Sons, of $48,000, which includes removal from the site :f the school foundations, footings, blacktop and filling the site with cttan granular fill and compaction. At that time, an estimate was given of $79,000 if the area was not to be compacted. In talking recently wins Carl Bolander 6 Sons, they indicated that a lower price can even he expected now by the City of Monticello. Additionally, 1 will be talking with the firm that removed the school building in Buffalo prior to Monday night's meeting, to review the site and get his feelings relative to cost plus salvage rights. - 9 - Council Agenda - 11/24/80 I Dowling Home - At the same time the City of Monticello receives bids for the School Building, it could also include the Dowling Home. A better price probably would be received if it was included at that time. Bids could be taken for each phase of the project, and this could mean that a separate contractor could be awarded removal of the Dowling Home and a separate contractor could be awarded removal of the Oakwood School building. Removal of School Building in Buffalo - I talked with Kennedy Excavating, of Benson, Minnesota, a representative of the School District and also a representative of the Youth hockey Association in Buffalo, regarding removal of an elementary school there. Total cost of the removal project was $49,000; however, through an agreement directly between the contractor and the Youth Hockey Associa- tion and one other organization, salvage rights on certain items were retained by these non-profit groups. Profits from the sale were in the neighborhood of $2,000. Primary items that were put up for sale at this auction by the non-profit organizations were aluminum windows, shades, french doors, etc. Relocation of Library - For purposes of removal of the building, the library will be relocating to the City Council chamber as determined by the City Council at their last meeting, and this move should take place in the early part of December. It is anticipated that the School District will vacate the building as of January lot. Sale. of Site - once the site has been cleared, the City would be in a position to offer the property for sale. It would seem to me that the best way to proceed would be rather than to take bids on the sale of the property, to just list the property with n realtor or realtors indicating the planned unit development alternatives the City Council has previously reviewed and approved. It should be pointed out that real estate does not have to be sold on a bid basis, and this gives the City an opportunity to obtain a better price since you are not limiting the time period in which bids are to be received. POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of having our engineer prepare plans and speci- fications for the removal of the Oakwood School Building and Dowling Home.. REFER17NCES: Enclosed inventory list prepared by Loren Klein of the salvageable items in the Oakwood School. Also enclosed, list of ite s to b apt by School. % 10 ' Council Agenda - 11/24/80 7. Consideration of Ap pointing o Person or Persons to Serve on the Regional Hazardous Waste Criteria and Siting Comittee. PURPOSE: Enclosed you Will find a letter plus related materials from Rogert C. Dunn, Chairman of the Minnesota Waste Management Board, relative to the siting of at least one land disposal facility for hazardous Waste in the State of Minnesota. It should be pointed out that hazardous waste, for this purpose, does not include nuclear Waste. As you can see by Mr. Dunn's letter, all communities are being indicated on a preliminary basis as potential sites. In order to obtain input into the process, each community should be fully represented, as criteria for the ultimate site will be discussed and selected. POSSIBLE ACTION: Appointment of person or persons to serve on the Regional Hazardous Waste Criteria and Siting Committee. REFERENCES: Enclosed materials from Minnesota Waste Management Board MINUTES REGULAR MEETINC - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, November 11, 1980 - 7:30 P.M. Members Present: Jim Ridgeway, John Bondhus, Dick Marti::, Ed Schaffer, Loren Klein (ex -officio) Members Absent: Bill Burke 1. Approval of Minutes - October 14, 1980 meeting. Motion was made by Ed Schaffer, seconded by Dick Martie and unanimously carried to approve the minutes of the October 14, 1980 meeting as presented. 2. Public Nearing - Consideration of a Conditional Use for the Rivercrest Christian School. At the time of the advertising for the conditional use for Ery Radiant: and Terry Mick's to build too 18 -unit apartment buildings in Lauring Ilillside Terrace, it was brought to the City's attention that the Rivercrest Christian School had moved studenit: into the house to Lite west of the pre- sent Assembly of Cod Church. This information was brought to the City office's attention by one of the people receiving a conditional use hearing notice. What had happened, was that the administration of the itivercrest Christian School, knowing they needed more room to expand their educational classrooms, chose to expand into the house to the vest of the Assembly of Cod Church facility, which they already owned. They did not, npparently, knew that the School's expansion would require it conditional use, at: provided by Monticello Ordinance, in order that they might expand into that house. At the Planning Comminsioo's meeting on Tuesday night, there wore rcpre- oentatives of the neighborhood and also the Rivercrest Christian School to askand answer questions. 'those people couuncn[ing were as follows: William Everett, Administrator of the Rivercrest Christian School, presented a petition With some 100 signature on it requeating Lite considerati-ou of the, conditional une in order that Lhoy might, continue to havo claques vi thin that dwelling. included With that petition were Lite signatures of several of the neighbors who supported Lite request that Lite conditional use be granted. (It might be interesting to note that those neighbors who supported Lite request for consideration of the conditional use contained only one member of the Assembly of Cod Church). - I - /,_2 ,,-3 Planning Commission Minutes - 11/ 11/80 Jerry Brooks was opposed to the expansion of the School because he felt that the kids trespassed on his property and also he said that he objects -) to kids leaving the school area during the day.(Mr. Everett, Administrator of the Rivercrest Christian School, countered Ute second objection, because he said that the kids were not allowed to leave the school and drive in their vehicles during the day.) Gene Putnam, who spoke as a representative for lledtkes, expressed an objec- tion to the expansion of the School. Ile slated that he was aware that the Bedtkes and the Klatts had sent letters of objection to the school; lie vas also aware that Rasmussen's had sent a letter in favor of the school. Duane Rajanen indicated that he was in favor of the school, that his property directly abuts the school, and he had no objection. Our Building Official met with Mr. Gahart Decker, a representative of the Rivercrest Christian School, and toured the dwelling in which the classes were held. There. would be some Building Code requirements to upgrade por- tions of the dwelling, and should permission be granted to continue the educational use within that residential facility, Mr. Decker stated they would be willing to make those improvements. Mr. Decker also stated that presently, they are in the planning stage for a new Church/School facility, but that at this time, [to tentative plans have been completed and they are unable to reveal any plans ns to what the future might be. On a motion by Ed Schaffer, seconded by John Ilondhus, it was a unanimous vote to recommend approval until June 1, 1981, to hold the classes in the dwelling facility adjacent to the Assembly of Cod Chinch. if School were going to be held in that dwelling next year, it would be necessary to return to the Planning Commission and Council for a reconsideration for the following year. 3. Consideration of Extunding it Conditional Use - First Ilnptist Church of Monticello. At the. August 23, 1976 regular meeting of the Monticello City Council, n building permit was granted to huild a residence and use that residence as the First Baptist Church of Monticello Cor four yearn. At that time, the residence was to become the parsonage for the First Baptist Church and n new church fncility was going to be built. Th rte yonrs later, during 1979, in effort was made to purchase anuther Church fncility within the Community; hewCwai', that plan fell through, and later in the fall of 1979, the repreu,:ntativta of the First Baptist Church began plans and preparations for it new church facility on the site of the existing First Baptist Church. Itowever, since that time, available Mortgage money has evaporated, and it is [lost to, if not, impossible for them to obtain a mortgage which they can line to build their new church. �'l� Planning Commissiun Minutes - 11/11/80 Reverend Jerry Oas, Pastor of the First Baptist Church, was present and presented his request that they be allowed to muvc two UBC sLructures onto their property, to use as classrooms, for a period of not more than two years, and that they be allowed to continue their conditional use for not more than two years, until, hopefully, there would be mortgage money available for them to build a new church facility. (At this point, it was clarified that there is a difference between a UBC structure and a mobile home. Although a UAC structure may be designed and look similar to a mobile home, a UBC structure does meet all the requirements of a building which was built under the building code, and therefore is eligible to be placed within a community within the proper zoning district, provided it bears a UBC seal showing that it was manufactured under the supervision of a building official in n manufacturing plant. A mobile hume, is a structure which does not conform to any particular building code, and there- fore, is most often required to be placed within a mobile home park, with structures of similar kind.) This request is being made because of the lack of space within the present residential/church facility. A motion was made by Dick Martie, seconded by lid Schaffer to: Reconanend approval of this requcut for a two-yenlextension to continue the present residential building as a church facility; and Rucommend approval of this request to use UBC structures as temporary classrooms facilities for two years, or until such time as a new church facility is built. All voted in faVal' of this motion. 4. Consideration of Rezoning, Lots in Riverwood Estates - Floyd Kruse 6 Kermit Lindberg. At a recent Planning Coumtisuion meeting, it wan recommend,:d to approve the Riverwood Ealatea for Mr. Floyd Kruac and Mr. Kermit Lindberg. Ilovevr.r, at that time., there was n ponaible discrepancy in the zoning line. for portions of aeveral lots, and also the Lindberg's, on their portion of the property, proposed rezoning Lot 1, of Block 2 from R-1 to 11-3. At a sub- nequent meeting, the Planning Comaninuion recoimncnded granting rezoning of Lot 1, Block 2, from R -I to 11-3; however, it became necessary to defint! the an:n of I1-3 from the area of I1-1 oil Block 1, that portion owned by Mr. Floyd Kruse. In order to clarify that rezoning, it would be, necessary to rezone Lots 1, of Block 2, and Lor it I, 2 6 3 or Block 1, to I1-3 find L ave the balance of the lots zoned tic R-1. Ilowevor, because Mr. Kruse was uanblc to be rat the planning eontmianion meeting, it was determined then: would be no recommendation trade as to Whether or not Lot 4 of Block 1 would be zoned R -I or B-3, and that decision would be left to the diacration of tilt Council, baued on Mr. Floyd Kruse'a comments, which could be mad,: after rhe Plnnning Commission meeting or at tha Council mccting. A motion by John Bundhus, seconded by Dick Martie with all voting in favor of rezoning Lots 1, Block 2 and Lota 1, 2. 6 3, Block 1 to B-3 and leaving the balance of the lots as R-1. - 3 - /, -2 d- 3 Planning Commission Minutes - 11/11/80 5. Consideration of Ordinance Amendments to Simplify the Permit Process. As a result of the inquiry by John Bondhus at a previous Planning Commission meeting, Cary Nieber did some research on the possibility of simplifying the process for variances. As a result of the information brought back to the Planning Coaanission by Mr. Wieber, it was determined that a public hearing should be held in the future, at which time a discussion could be held as to the possibility of restructuring the ordinances to allow simplification of variances, par- ticularly those on setbacks. Meet'pg adjourned. Loren Klein, Zoning Ttdmtnietrator LDK/ns - 4 - C Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will ho hold by chu City OV, Monticello PI, train l rbmmi.Ui2r_ on Nov+p;%r�gyy . tg t10: at 7330 P. M. in the Monticello City hall to conaidne the following mALLer.; A conditional use application to allow the expansion of a school facility from its present: location into an adjacent dwelling. The nivercrest Christian school would like to bu able to expand their education clausrooma into tilt: dwelling to the south of the existing school/Chuich building. ' That dwelling is located on i.ot 5, Block 35, I...iwt:t Monticello and is zoned R-/2. / 1:)11L, ?YL) 04, a t�,�I ��.�r-tirr.(� rj.,yrrr..r�u-cam j��' f..-t�/•: t •'f'% iz.�L'r • . /% 13 G' = t.•t L' .yr4{,G' c j .-t,,,,� tc tl••:: c /�Jfj rt v -C.._. y f�"'.ti" -1�r. r-z'L� .� vc. ,�irr.-•t4 �r.H .,t"L:�L,.r-�rrzac: � ! . .Lc• C� � � . :t er y .alt /t:.if ee, c rt c� i D _e ' - srLd7�'tf r'!%;I�rjc r v �-L r ` t (.e„ si•..s'rrrtrar <-r ��J' 0"72t� t" r ` '!` I •.�r'�•*tet �f c-~ `' * • APPLICANT; Rivarcrsst Christian This matter is tentatively scheduled to be c3.m,iJvtcJ by City t,t Mantt !•11u City Council a, Hovvmbat 24 lry 60 Thia meotiny starts at 7370 P, M. Please address any eorrtespondencix 'r to the otsliq AJMinestrator offlcua. Written and oral tostimooy will hr at rel+t 3• r � aI -e sit+Irt,. and All It.1 iesiring to be heath on referenced suhjaet wfll 7 h+•xi1 At his mcntin•;. 31� Wive Klstn, Zoning Adm,~ 1.Jril..L Ol' Notice in hereby given that n public hominy will Ile he Ul by Um Cily Of Monticello nlannim role •cion on novonbr_r 11 1 19 i36: at 7 a30 P. M. in the Monticello City 11,111 to consider the following matter: A conditional use application to allow the •� expansion of a school facility from its pronent location into an adjacent dwelling. The Rivercrest Christian school would like to be able to expand their education classrooms into the 1 dwelling to tile south of the existing school/clwrch building. 1rj•. That dwelling is loc.,ted on Lot S, Block 35, Lover Monticello and is zoned I1-2. g n.s�� �L z4- �L; -%ei- �L.e..•..�b.<• �. _ `�; fi lC•(ri:. ���..� �.�.� icy[, f., ,� �� _ �' � f f l � �� ;� .r.'.i r �- C-(�[:`litrt:��. l•: �, ^"%`,�t Ct�[t-r .. � ,..• . c �. r ._- n` � _.l•rr•, • o `7.tt..� .7i.:n•.r...rLr, C:C� /'�'+<:. r r. ,� G 'l:.i ;/�( ,Cr4 a e.4L'I1... 1 Leo . af1 � .,./ • `r' .� � .! ..•..w � . {� �. /L�ae.v l'= re. r.,r r;.C:•.. __i. <r r, 1 r �r N (+ I �nCt.l.:J'- — Cr•-1.{,..•� �•t�l`. •�fM1. i `� _•tT'.+'� li.�G l•s f / C . ` .L !l .ra APPLICANT: Y •/�CC[.r ✓.l. -..9.I_ Rlvurcrs: at Chr Latin r This matter is tentatively schaduled to be I.�-nnidctcd Ly City of Monttc,•liu LC City Council on Nuvembar .4 l0 6l: 7•hia meeting ®tarCs st 7130 P. M. _ -- --- '— 'C'• 1.. Please addcass any coetsepondrncu to the Luning Administrator ofCtcas. Wri ttan And ua." trstimoey ,.i 11 he m -opl rl r•I a1•ov.• aubj..t curt all 1. 1 .ona deai ring to ba hasl.l on raferrnced nlhJeet will t�F• hlrar�d�e1lll:. •rtLny. % Loren xleln, C(u.11rJg AdmC, �1 ��! X17, 1 Z/•9 V November T, 1980 Zoning Administration Office City Hall Monticello, Minnesota 55362 Dear Sir: we support the conditional use permit applied for � by Rivercrest Christian School for the use of their annex on the corner of Fourth and New Streets as a classroom facility. 3 ( Sincerely, Jami �+ Richard N. Rasmussen F �r J Carolyn M. F.asmunsen r I R ivercrest Christian School U h & Wright St. Mont icello, Minnesota 55362 City of Monticello Planning Commission and City Council The following 100 signatures support the permit for conditional use of the yellow annex facility for Rivercre st Christian School. It is the in tent of the school, to utilize the yellow annex to meet the enrollment needs of the program. Contact has been made to provide crossing guards at two crossings and provide more adequate control for the neighborhood arca. Patrols will be placed in thevicinity by December 3, 1980. The following individuals located in the area of 350 square feet of Rivercrest also signed the supportive lustificacio n of need; (_ Gladys Bitzer 213 New St. 295-2606 Inez Carlson 424 Wright St. 295-5067 Gladys Olson 424 Wr ight St. 295-5067 Duane Rajanen 412 E. 3rd. St. 295-5339 Richard Carlson 400 E. 3rd. St. 295-5765 Bette G. Harotead 322 E 4th. 295-5595 Roger Cox 306 E. 4th 6 Mrs. 295-5874 Mr. and Mrs. Wm. Jamison 216 E.4th 295-2334 Darlene Bonjoi 216 E. 4th 295-3289 Mr. and Mrs. Byron Tealou 218 E. 4h 295-5147 Ms, and Mrs. Dwight Buckonlah 212 E. 4th 295-2184 (16 Total) "C L5 0 9YiTu.•i7�•: '''�I!)rIfil ° of " o 0 oy a o a jt L[atificatlou uf. H.:._.I; P.., 1ui"Lhc r° 1: h.r•eua l:iuuancu ul CLvu rc ruu L' l'hrir:tidn C Schou I, c1,: no.al liar. nr i::­[' 1.41 ul:i Li vo I'hc yu 11 ow.ana.:x a:; a fact IiLy co'' 0 acct Lite I;rowiny; iwcd of .nn' program. Application ha.: Lawn madu I,u amlinur.' Lite twe of the l:acill"i.y taidur a V4mdLdojial IJau Permit (in 114) ,Zone. i � '1'ht fo'lluwJn,;, iudivldunln ar.: e:upporClvr: of LhLs cxtunxlun uE Lho Ilivcl•- _ l crust Ch.-1:;ti;m :........I pro r;ua,. 1 X6.3— <95'0'7 ox. _ l/ l'� n263 - 74,r1: 0 JUStifIcathill of UtUd! To further OU coiitinuance Of 1'iv(tTcMSL Christian School, thu need his arij.un to Llie yellow anner. I:,. a facility to must th,.- growing n.-ed .-i )or pro,ir;svi. Application 11,11; 111-Ir1 MaLIL to C011tijAUC the use of the Facility tmd.-r a Conditional U,;e Permit (In R-2) Zoile. The follu%J1111, hidividinda al'u- i,i this extim:;inn of the lljv�r- P 1 .--- 91 X&3- -4 75-il' CZ -.-2 13. I Am -t.11 Ir.11 luu 111 i. 1„ 1 it Lh.•I I i . ,:,all lnuouce rn L i., , : r:.L t•hi l:.Llall Sdwul, ILo nood 11.1. .11 .1 1,.,,1111 Ihn yolluw.1111. .,.. .1 IaulIily to mrat lh�• I raulu,•, 11.•,11 .11 .iu,' pio I:u,. Appl.l.cation 11.1.. L,•.v1 m.1du Lu conLlnuo Llw 11110. uI Ow I WI lily 111111.0 a 111-111111111111 Ilvu Perialc (it, I:-7.) Zone. The lull..•vin 1wliviJ11.11.. :111• u11111;.wtiv.• W chl.1+exl'ur:iun W Phr. NVI'l-1 CYCst Ch1i::ci.111 rm. I Aft A1r-AJOA 7 4. 12. 13. 14. ... ...•i•. , •1. t'..lt -r .Iuotitie.ILiun Of Mi 1.111, TO Slliti,ty ctl.: caucinuance or iiiv..:rerest Chrt:tian School, the nved hn:. 1ri:.:n to utilier til" yellow ann,a a:: a facility Lo wet thr. I,ruwing nred ,,I uur pro;•ram. Application lint; hcun made to continue t11, uul ur the facility nnd.:r 1 Conditional Unct Permit (in R-2) Luuo« The folluuing individuals are r:nppol'Civ+ of this extension of the River - crest Chri:;tiara /I� I pru ml: 1. t°c ` 1�;� -- A % r - va y s 7. u, —7—a- �cv,z/v 2 9 5-- - %7 iii« 13« <o cl I.wUlloV II., opu Ow I-woA ha, :n•iecn Is ui_f I I-. Yo I loo allu, W; *I faul lily to movL L6. o- ,"V AppllCaLloli 114w 1w,l) tuntle to cullLillue mw ,I' Lile C*,ICI 111'7 1:0114-1, :j CA.Ikjjj,tj(ijj:jj U:;u 1�erinit (111 11-2) Zolitt. The foll"wilij, linliviiiiialt; .,I-,! nkipporl:lwt oF C11111 Of lAw lzjv::O_- po D a�l .)IIStifiC:ILiOlI Of V. ' I . Tv ItIrd-V Oh- con tilIMILICO 01 VlVL:lCL,-:IL QrLntiziti SIA1001, Lite 111, -1 IM.. .111; ca C-1 'ItAli— Lild Y011"W -111-1 :; -1:1 1 fLIVA My LU tm-LL tho Armin , 11— .1 of , tir pr,,. cam. Applicat:Joll 1,:,:, hr,vt ulo.lr 1,) continue Lite It:;,: ol Lite I-1,11 I Ily tmd-r a ikuldil lonal 11mi Permit. (11, R-2) ZU11(t. The 1'olhwfil,; i.mljvi4Il.Il:; ]I',- t,upligiftive of thit; cxt(!I,:tjoIj of tl,L. 111vul— creaL UwiSC[aii '., .,t-1 Il I- ram: Y3 I J, Y 7S' C Nl,vcndner' `l. I Jall .1114 t l f ica t i oil of Nood TO further tine CUI1 t o 111U:111eC of Itivercrest Christian. ' l Schuul, tlNe need has arlsen to 'utilize the yellow annexuas a facility to meet , the growing need of our program. Application has been made to continue the J use of the facility under a Conditional Use Permit (in It -2) 7 nc. The following individuals arc supportive of this ,extenl:ion of the Rivercrest Christian School prup,r:nu: 'I'IilJil'll(INIi N0. ✓. 7 j4— d/�¢�.�ID-.✓ �q�i^ b .ted E.J�� G 0 C Novclnber 9, 1980 �. Judi Citation of NraJ: To CurUlOr Lho cunlinu:nlca Of Itivc rc resC Christian Schuul, Lllc Ill'Cll lizis :IriSCII LO ULiI LZC LIIC Yellow a1111C% as :1 faciliLy to II1L•CL LhC 81.0wilig aced of Unr I)rogl-:lin. AppliCn Lion lla;i I)Con Whit! Lo CO11LilluC LhC usC Of Ulu laciliLy under a CunJiLiun:ll Use Porlllit (in It -2) 7-, Iu. 1110 following individuals aro supput•Livc of LhiS cxLcnSion of Lhc ItivorcrCSL Christian School progi-nm: 1..Lar►i a q S�r:l•�6 �nrlo. —� 2. Rv1 ZCo3 -3710 J.., ,� �J 7�_ a i,� a. s. H L USC01 to lot% x eve avbj Wic NO. 94 1-1 t. piret 6aptliat Church M, Qoz Tz 1,4 et 'h7 r FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH 41 1330 WEST BROADWAY IONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 55362 (612) 295-3552 PASTOR GERALD OAS November 5. 19130 TO; City of Monticello, Planing Commission and City Council FROM: First Baptist Church of Monticello In late summer of 1976 when the First llnptist Church of Monticello was granted a building permit to construct our temporary facility in the form of a "house -church", the City Council allowed us to use the residential building code with a few modifications, even though the useage was of a commercial nature. We agreed with the Council that with in four years of occupancy we would convert the building to a residential use and construct a perrnnent churrh- type commercial code building. We have made every effort to keep that npreement in good faith with the city. However, the attempt to purrhagr, the Asnemhly of God facility in 1479 was thwarted by pnv-rnmental maneuvering. We then resumed our efforts to design and build on our present mite, subdividing, surveying, and ohtninini, the ne.censary conditional, use permit. We were again prevented from keepint, our promine to vacate our present facilities because the available mortparf! money evaporated ns the money market 11dried up." Our plan is to construct a church -type building on our mita an soon as money becomes nvailablo. In the nrantime, wo respectfully request nn extensio:i of our agreement with the city for up to two more yenrm use of our present facility as we continuo to crow toward the erection of n new building. To eliminate over crowding And poaniblo iinnger wv hnve added an ad- ditional worahip nervice to ncromdate our prowth. We do need Additional clAsarotlms and at prmncnt. ,ere- mi'r.inp, r"quemt of the city through the Planiap Con,timnion and i'nuncil for :i wlivrr to allow a mobile home to be situated nn our situ for up to two years to bee vacated at the same time, an our tempnrnr,y facil it v. Both of the nbove requests Aro urprrrit ,ind vriti:•al +n our rontinued growth. l Am aware that the Platting olmmimn'nil in not rehoduled to meet until November 11, but would nak if ponmible ynu consider theme matters in special sessinn no thnt the council could deal with the issue at their November 10 meetinp. FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH 1330 WEST BROADWAY MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA 55362 page 2 =5. i i (612)295.3552' PASTOR GERALD OAS Thank you for your just considerations of these requests as we grow together with our city to serve its people. . ncerely, ator Jerry Oas First Baptist Chu ch JO:lw LJ IN cfsq.fit.' It 17 Ir s4 ft. l ' I Three ra.'� 1— — _ } • ,�jl('i'1n _...t� — .e V —T -Mississippi Dr 10 �•` \ ..._._ _._ ^I�.Ctt}034.i!"_,y...ly...14rRQC3u.I�..� D�cn i 'q+.� .� to ,�t.. �\ •mon ytt .4 r$..j� 1 n 9 2�'1 f9 �•` t - _ s 1 131500 919, 92 SpQ t 11 f ti *i ti14{�\ 922 —9,0 S • "1 ,�, J r . ' •-r i ,� � � '`90 / 940 90 944 • ,mss I�. i ., ,�� 1 r_ I � T4 ~'.i• �� �.. 48 . I{/ q,t 2Q��• f + .1 Vii• ;11 ` '~ ,` 9 ."'ti `•..r " \ ',,`,,,,y .may .,,,,,_ t — it 1 0Viking VPS PIPE SERVICES CO. 8I-1211prun Ara•nur•Minur+puli>, Alinuc.ur., 55.131.1.121815.52814 November 17,1.980 City of Monticello City Hall I•Ionticello, Minnesota Attention: Mr. -John Simola Director of Rrblic Works Dear Sir: I am asking you and your city council and administraLor for special consideration in the payment of the enclosed invoice, for all or portion o: cite :3,266.00 overrun, as per original quotation. In all fairness in my past 10 yenra in this boniness, and may I add with a good record of performance of my crevs, I would bid the came ,Job in the same manner. The extent of very heavy debris in Lite line, caused by unforeseeable sage, or uneven lineage of pipe cuusirzg the above, Lite ronin fact being we were cleaning a multi interceptor line with above :somal flows which 99 chances of 100, would clean out in an average situation. Your video tape shows the resultc, our crews cleaned all the debris,and I appreciate the work given Viking Pipe Services Company and again gentleman, I would appreciate your considerations of the above and I thank your city for the cooperation given our crews during the tenure of the ,Job. Thanking you, I remain. Very truly yours, VIKING 111p,SERVICE'S L•OAIPANY r–�Gour•SclutcdIer i Suor,,wpv S,—,rex in, f. nnsulnnp Jnq.n,�r,.a ,M1/n,r,n,rbru�c f. nnnuCrnr �n�,1 muustry I V VIKING PIPE SERVICES CO. ��-/C Do■ 452 Houle 0 Oemidji• mj.n !.:ola 55Go1 City of Monticello City Hall 11/17/80 Monticello, Minnesota 55362 D. 1. Vovr Orta, No. As per Quotation 0u1 01.c' No. 3l Attention:Mr. John Simola 84 Hours @ $85.00 Pei, Hour = $7,1110.00 18 Hours @ $75.00 per Hour = $1 350.0 J Less ]rot To aceed = $5,223.23 Overrun = $3,266.77 LTHAfiK YOU . C PLEASE PAY ON INVOICE • No statement will bo sont unloss requostetl m r1 VIKING PIPE SERVICES CO. VPS`!^�S Box 452 Rouse O Oemidji, Minnesota 55G01 City of Monticello City Hall 0- 11(17(00 Monticello, Minnesota 55362 Y-010,'uo, varLal a., owe, o. 31 F',xtra Attention: Mr. John Simola ' Extra Cleaning & Televising 4 Hours 2 $75.00 per hour Televising = $300.00 7 Hours @ $05.00 per Hour Cleaning $595.00 TOTAL DUE _ $095.00 TlAldh YOU 1 PLEASE PAY ON INVOICE • No stetemont will Do sent unloss ropuostoJ J J J Submitted by: John Simola, Public Works Dir. RIVER STREET TRUNK SEVER t The River Street trunk sewer cleaning and TV inspection project was completed on Wednesday, November 5, 1980. The amount and types of debris found in the lines were much heavier than originally estimated. Huge chunks of asphalt joint material, large rocks, pipe couplings, as well as siguifi- cant amounts of sand and gravel were found. It was originally estimated that the lines were 15 - 20% plugged with debris (refer to Council memorandum dated September 17, 1980) while in fact many portions were 'found to be in excess of 50% plugged with sand and gravel. The TV inspection revealed the following information: 1. With the exception of a few roots, the TV inspection found the lines to be well cleaned by Viking Pipe Cu. From New Street to Dayton St., no significant problems were found. There were several smaller sags, some slightly protruding sewer service connections, and a few cracked pipe, 2. Between Dayton St. and Old Vacated Cedar Sc., a 4" PVC sewer setviee pipe was found protruding into the main by 3 to 4" at Lot 6, Block 25 (the Walter Klatt residence). 3. From Old Vacated Cedar Street to Old Vacated Elm Street, two more pro- truding sewer service connections were found. Both were found to protrude 2". One would be the Iry Kallin residence and the other would be the Willard Anderson home. These connections are located within 4' of each other. In addition, there is n broken joint and small hole within I' of the sewer connection for the Dental Clinic. 4. From Vacated Cedar Street to Vacated Oak Street there are Dome pro- truding service conneetionu installed for future use, and sags in excess of 4" were found. 5. In the area through the woods behind Dr. Kauper's home and through the Bondhus property, many sags were found, several of which are 7 - 8" or more deep, Thiu alai) iudicatcu lit lea -;L three, manholes have settled. I'lre sags, settled manholes and protruding service connectiona are all items of concern, ns they limit the capability of the trunk sewer and allow solida (sand, gravel, etc.) to settle out of sunp,rnsion and become deposited in tilt: sagn. Debris which settles in these uags becomes very denne and is difficult to remove. - I - Y River Street Trunk Sewer ( Continued) There are several approaches to this problem. One is to live with the - line as it exists, and give it constant yenrly maintenance. Another alternative would be to implement repairs such as removing obstructions and raising manho es and sags Other approaches could be any combination of the foro egoing. 20yb .2S1 --u -4 C. I have been asked by Viking Pipe Co. for the Council to consider additional payment for the cleaning portion of the project. Due to the extremely heavy amounts and types of debris, as well as the severity of the sags, much more time was necessary to effectively clean the lines. Both of the firms who quoted us on the project, as well as myself, estimated the debris levels to be 15 - 20%. This is indicated by the closeness of the two quotes. The cleaning overrun amounted to 110% of Viking's estimate for that portion, or 44 crew hours. This resulted in a cost over- run of $3,266.77 on the River Street Trunk. Viking would like the Council to consider a portion of this for payment, due to the unexpected conditions encountered. It should be pointed out that this firm has cleaned lines in Monticello for free to demonstrate equipment and train personnel. They have also rented their jet machine to us at a reduced rate. It is my opinion that the City did receive benefit from those extra hours and should consider this additional payment request. J Submitted by: John Simola, Public Works Dir. r�(( PROPOSED SALE OF SLUDGE• TRUCE: The general contractor for the Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrading, Paul A. Laurence Co., becomes responsible for sludge disposal during construction of the new plant. Their responsibility begins with the Engineer's Notice to Proceed. Jerry Crundtner, with Paul A. Laurence Co., has expressed an interest in purchasing the City's 1962 International sludge truck. As this truck was due for retirement years ago, and as we will receive two new units with the Plant, I felt confident to negotiate a sale price. The figure arrived at was $3,500, in addition to a two -foot concrete apron in front of the newly constructed pole building at the Wastewater Treatment Plant. Mr. Grundtner has inspected the vehicle and has been made fully aware of its' need of repair, and has indicated that lie will restore it immediately to dependable operating condition. 1 recommend that the City Council accept the above offer for the sale of this sludge truck. 1 o r OAKWOOD AGR£F:11£tiT School District Equipment Retained by School District 1 V 1. Kitchen A. Serving table, flour bin, steam kettle B. Stoves and ovens C. Assorted small tables, chairs, carts, etc. D. Shelving A. Piano B. Chairs and small tables in store room G. iixercise frame on cast wall 113. Lower Level A. Equipment in shower room, chairs, shelves, lockers, etc. 11, f:goil.mrnt in store rooms, :shelving c. Kcmnvable equipment in boiler room, furniture, griudars, snwn; e:helving, files, tools, etc. IV. Middle Level A. £yuipment in store rooms, shclvinl;, etc. B. St nut•nt desks in Room 6 i i'pprt Level .. More room equipment, s elving B. District Office :i. tables :,ud desku b. counter and files t C. free standing shelving' C. Attft' - northing of"uric to the achuol- vi 11 he 1.•.. i.v! I Ya . Sl,arin2 !:ducat inn Office - Old IYibrary A. r%iinitutc, desks, chairs, etc. Fs, aitulving. rahinets, dividers, etc. j" ciI`. faltsid.: A. we might want to move the tin shed to 1'liurlc+od if the city doi:nn't l it . -B. Contents of tin sited iters not listed above may be added as apeed to by the 11-0hot,l I131.ttiCt ud f.i t Y. 1 V Cast Iron Radiators throughout the building Door closers. Some sinks and some bathroom fixtures. Privacy walls around the stools in the bathrooms. Mirrors that are in the bathrooms. Towel dispensers in the bathrooms. Two stools, three urinals, four stools, two sinks, one slop sink. Several solid core doors. Exit signs. A lot of blackboards. The boiler. One air compressor Several hundred feet of 1' x 1' ceiling tile. Approximately 150 flourescent light fixtures. Several hundred feet of suspended ceiling and gridwork. Approximately 12 water fountains Carpeting in several rooms Walnut paneling and folding door. Several doors with glass in them For sentimental value, possibly portions of the decorative Atone, the stone arches, brick, the old wooden flag pole, possibly the wooden ornaments on and along the stairway. Roll -up doors between the kitchen and gymnasium. Electrical panels and electrical switches - the large switching devices. Two large, 400 volt, 50 horse safety switches. The metal framed metal doors at the entrance to the gymnasiums. Security lights and eoaduit surrounding the outside of the. building. The air conditioner on the public library; air conditioner for administrative portion of the building. Old brass or bronze light fixtures on the front of the library. Largo stone over the library doors which any "Worth Brasie Memorial Library". Several pieces of decorative stonework on the outside of the building - the arches and other decorative panels Three stone# across the front of the building which say "lligh School", corner ■tone which says "190911. Metal storm window■ STATE.OF MINNF.bUTA f,��++��, _ WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD "� 127 THORSON BUILDING 7927 SETH AVENUE f:ORTH ` 'CRYSTAL, MINNESOTA 55428 OF FI C I A L N OT I F I C AT ION November 10 , 1980 TO Affected Comoun i t les FROM Robert G. Dunn Chairman SUBJECT: SEARCH AREA NOTIFICATION HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL SITE R09ER10 OUNN CH"MAN TELEPHONE METRO AREA L83 2)530-0816 OUMTAIe I•aO0 052.074 This memo is an offie lel notification that the Minnesota Haste Management Board has identified your community as a possible search area for a hazardous waste disposal facility. This notice Is a part of the required siting process set in motion by the Minnesota Legislature under the Waste Management Act of 1980. jhq-Legisl - rgti-after rmler veli bpratlon, decided that a hazardous waste land-disposll ecJ..lI.ty_was-eeded_-In-Minnaiota.. The Wasto.Monagement,Boardwas-erestea and given -the -task of',elting Qt_leost_one such land disposal faellity,! The Boar also musf inventory and recommend preferred sites for hazardous waste processing, Incineration' and transfer and storage favi I ities. Your, communl ty may be considered as apotentfal site for these faclIIties as well. The hazardous waste disposal facility that we are considering will be based on successful waste management practices and technologies used elsewhere in the: United;States. No de-clsIon has been made yet about the final faclIIty design --the Legislature decided that it should fi rot be the subject of pubic e discussion and debate --but an enclosed sheet suggests some of the technologies, that may be used as woll as why such facilities are needed. Naturally, you will ask, "On what basis have you chosen us as a possible search area for ahazardous _IMP_gfisposal foci IIty?" The answer Is this -- ie Tieva not. yet e�1ml sste��any�,tarco n ty.� We want to share the Information we ave an�get your Ideas before we maka a final decision. We must make soma major decisions on criteria and sites soon. The law requi res that by May 1981, the Waste Management Board must propose six or more candidate sites for the hazardous waste land disposal facility. That means that between now and May 1981, we not discuss and select criteria and apply those criteria aLIAW MEMAUIa OISTAICI 1 LAURLNCt IIINT(N H Tt,zj, 0161IACT a LWNSE RULILALNa. LW— p4b e45TNICI 2 KEITH RI)I TtR5 0.kR o ft UISIMCT 0 IHuMA9 W IBILA LIR Prv& LS 1 140 3 WRLIAM A. IfliNt A AtiNW.J WARK:1 I ALLANCIOE ISRR,Ay LV_TAICT 4 LAA ICN ANCA( JH INTO, hk i LAAO LUIIAC T A ()AVID MANTLE/ HtRWw+'II 7 . 2 - to the entire State. Obviously, criteria become very important to the selection process. Depending on the criteria, any locality in Minnesota, including yours, could be selected as a site for this facility. In keeping with both the spirit and letter of the Waste Management Act, the Mind'esota Waste Management Board will select criteria and candidate sites only after extensive public involvement at the local level. As a local official. you and/or a representative of your community are invited and encouraged to participate in this process. if you iqnore this public input process, then your community may not be fully represented as criteria are discussed and selected. Enclosed with this memo is a reply card. .lease-return--it-to us with_the_nam s and -mailing -addresses - the person or . tons from yaus:�comi nity�who will;? P�elp Minnfsots=selecticriterla-for the -siting -of a hazardous wasta_'iand dlsposaj' LAcLLLtY./ - The persons whose names you give us, together with other interested citizens, will form a criteria and siting committee in your Development Region. A similar committee will be formed in each of the I; Development Regions of the State. Regional Development Commission staff representatives may help the committees by arranging meeting space, taking minutes, sending notices, etc. The committees will meet at least twice between now and May 1981. Their job is to give the Waste Management Board significant input into the process of select- ing criteria and sites for a hazardous waste disposal facility. Also enclosed Is a step-by-step schedule which details the procedures the Waste Management Board will follow in selecting candidate and final sites for the disposal facility. As you can see, there is also opportunity for public involve- l mens after the candidate sites have been selected. Your Involvement prior to - that tt mo however, can help determine whether or not your community is in the final list. Another enclosure for your consideration before our upcoming meetings is a fact sheet on siting factors that have been suggested to us. Some of these factors might eliminate your area from further consideration. Others might identify your community as a likely location for a hazardous waste disposal site. Although we are listing these factors without endorsement, we wi11 have to choose between them soon so we can Identify sites. So come to the meeting In your Development Region if you agree or disagree with these factors or If you have others to propose. We want your recommendations and suggestions on the criteria, standards, and procedures we should use In selecting candidate sites, either at the meeting or by letter before then, Your community is a possible site for a hazardous waste disposal facility. Your community should help the Waste Management board determine where and +tn what basis this facility ought to be sited. We have no preconceived notions. We do, however, agree with the Legislature that hazardous.!non=nuclear wasti'is a problem and that something has to be done. We also knew 01it-the"pro6le while serious, is not yet critical. Together we can find a solution. But we need your help to do it. Please send us the names of your community representatives no later than November 21, 1980. RGD:mhr Enclosures WHAT IS A HAZARDOUS WASTE LAND DISPOSAL FACILITY AND WHY DOES MINNESOTA NEED ONE? v Along with the benefice of modern technology come certain drawbacks. To make our standard of living possible, a variety of manufacturing processes furnish necessary products. Those same processes, however, produce by-products and eventually wastes. These include, for example, miscellaneous chemicals, waste oils and solvents, paint sludges, electro• plating wanes. and incinerator ashes. These waste by-products must be safely disposed of or effectively recycled or reprocessed. Most wastes from industry do not constitute a problem, but some do. The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency have identified certain wastes from industrial, laboratory, medical, mining, and agricultural activities as "hazardous." (Actually, even some household activities could generate hazardous wastes.) Unlike solid waste, such as household garbage, hazardous wastes usually cannot be routinely managed in a unitary landfill. Specially designed facilities may be necessary to ensure that these wastes are reduced and disposed of safely. Processing facilities can recycle or reduce the amount of hazardous waste, and disposal facilities are used for long-term containment. Technology exists to ensure the safe disposal of hazardous waste, but currently Minnesota does not have the facilities needed to manage the hazardous wastes generated by our state (more than 150,000 tons per year, by one estimate). It is the responsibility of the Waste Management Board to determine specifically what sizes and types of facilities are needed to manage these wastes, and then to find a site for at least one land disposal facility in the State. The private sector will be expected to construct and operate the facilities once the sites are finally chosen. Since the technical options available must be tailored to the specific needs of the State, Minnesotans must register their opinions on the need, safety, cost, benefit and effect of a hazardous waste disposal facility. That's why public involvement Is needed. Without this involvement, it is too early to say exactly what Minnesota's land dsposzel facility will tock like. However, a general picture can be tentatively drawn. The land disposal facility would be large — possibly 400 acres if it is to contain 20 years of Minnesota's land _ disposable hazardous waste. "Celli' for waste containment would be constructed, first by excavating soil and then by Installing engineering safeguards against waste seepage. These would probably Include carefully placed clay or synthetic liner systems and underground collection pipes to collect seepage and return it to the surface for treatment. There would also be monitoring systems to warn if any seepage had penetrated the liners and escaped into surrounding soils. Wastes would probably be trucked in; possibly 20 to 30 loads a day. Laboratory spot checks (on or off site) would ascertain the Identity and appropriate management of incoming wastes. Pre-treatment of certain wastes would probably be required, and could occur either at the disposal site or at a waste processing facility elsewhere. This would have the effect of reducing the volume or the level of hazard of the wastes, or of removing excess water that could complicate operations or tarry contaminants awsy from the land disposal facility. Incompatible wastes would be separated and placed in different parts of the site, and accurate records of all wastes disposed and their locations in the facility would be maintained. As individual waste containment calls were idled during the operation of a site, impermeable soils of liners would be placed over them and the top sod would be contoured to handle fain runoff. This would help divert moisture from the 1 wastes and still further reduce the chance of seepage away from the site. anan Final closure of the facility would be performed according to strict federal and state vlronmental stdards, Before the tadlity operator could even be licensed he or she would have to have determined provisions for long term care of the site. Included would the lintel cover and contouring, and groundwater and other long term mentoring of the uta. Any problems would have to be corrected by the facility operator alone or In conjunction with federal or state authomits. This description is only preliminary, since the final design of the facility is one of the issues for public d,saassson before the Waste Managfement Board makes any final decisions. prepared by, Minnesota Waste Management Beard 7323 60th Avenue North Crystal, MN bbe11 HYDROGEOLOGY — The Minnesota Geological Survey, (MGS) has prepared a report_ to the WMB that recommends that hazardous waste disposal sites be, located away from major groundwater systems, such as significant bedrock and surficial aquifers. This would insure that a disposal facility would be less likely to pollute these natural C resources by accidental seepage. o MGS recommends that the WM8 divide the State into three categories: • Areas, where there is a low probability of groundwater contamination because significant groundwater resources are probably absent. • Areas where productive groundwater systems may or may not exist, so that there is a reduced probability of finding naturally favorable sites. • Areas where significant groundwater systems exist, and where extensive engineering or natural protection (e.g.. low permeability clay soils) would be necessary to safeguard these groundwater systems from any accidental seepage from a disposal facility. SOIL PERMEABILITY —The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has ttated that thick layers of low permeable soils — such as certain heavy clays — will inhibit the flow of spilled wastes into groundwater systems below even if the wastes somehow penetrate the engineered safeguards of a facility (such as liners and collection devices). Therefore, thick, Impermeable soils might compensate for inadequacies in the hydrogeology, factor. EPA at one point used the figures of live feet of material with a permeability of less than two inches per year. Such exact data are not available on a statewide basis, so on-site investigations would be necessary to determine the permeabilities and soil thicknesses of specific tracts of land — if the citizens of the State and the WM8 finally decide that soil permeability is an important siting factor. SURFACE WATERS AND FLOODPLAINS — The Pollution Control Agency and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency regulate hazardous waste disposal. Though they offer few specific siting criteria, they do prohibit certain locations. Including: within a 100 -year flood plain; within 1,000 feet of shoreland: and within a wetland. These surface water factors must be observed by the WMB in the siting process, although they may become most relevant only after specific sites are being considered. This Is because many of these prohibited areas are often less than a township in size. So although a part of a township is excluded. there still may be enough land within it for an acceptable site. Cprepared by: Minnesota Waste Management Board 7727 58th Avenue North Crystal, MN 55428 POSSIBLE SITING FACTORS The Waste Management Board (WMB) decided not to select siting criteria for a hazardous waste disposal facility until citirens throughout the State had expressed their opinions on the subject. However, to encourage discussion the WMB is now mentioning certain factors that have been suggested to the WMB or in past siting studies. They are stated without endorsement by the WMB, and are merely a starting point for the discussion that will guide the WMB in choosing linal criteria and sites that are acceptable to most of the interested citizens of ilia Slate. These factors reflect opinions of various government agencies and other organizations regarding the best types of locations to site hazardous waste land disposal facilities, based on such concerns as groundwater protection, transportation safety, economic feasibility, industrial development, and health, safety, and nuisance impacts on the nearby public. These are not the final siting criteria, nor have they been given any weights relative to each other. Maps will be available at future meetings in your Development Region that show how your community stands on some of these factors. Other factors may not be mapped because statewide data is unavailable or because they cannot be researched and analyzed until specific sites are under consideration. HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATION — Hazardous waste generation is often concentrated in industrialized areas. It has been suggested that disposal facilities should not be sited too far from the points of generation because of increased transportation costs and risks. In Minnesota, the only statewide data currently available indicates that aha major generating areas are the Twin Cities Metropolitan area and Southeast Minnesota, generating an estimated 66 percent and 18 percent of the State's hazardous wastes, respectively. It is difficult to say how close a disposal facility should be to the generating areas. One suggested figure is 100 miles or less, although today certain wastes are being trucked about 400 miles to facilities in Illinois and elsewhere. TRANSPORTATION ACCESS — Reports done for the Pollution Control Agency and other government bodies have suggested that transportation access may be an important siting factor, since it will determine the roadways that hazardous waste will move over and the likelihood and the possible harmful effects of any accidents. Possible aspects to consider include adjacent land uses (e.g.. schools, hospitals, and residences), the numhrr of intersections per mile, and the distance frons certain types of main highways (e.g.. limited access four -lane roadways; State and federal highways: or 9 -ton capacity roads). SETTLEMENT PATTERNS — A study of hazardous waste done for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency suggests that a hazardous waste land disposal facility and buffer tune could require about 420 acres to contain 20 years worth of Minnesota generated wastes. This site is very tentative and will be finally determined only after further analysis, public discussion, and decisions regarding what wastes may be land disposed in Minnesota. Still, the 420 -acre figure suggests that areas of dense population mttlement may not contain land parcels large enough for a facility. LAND OWNERSHIP PATTERNS — Land ownership patterns may affect the feasibility of acquiring parcels of land large enough to aeeornnsodate a hazardous waste land disposal facility. They also can affect the types of adjacent land uses that may be subject to nuisance impacts horn a facility. Some of the land ownership patterns that may be considered include the number of different owners and whether ownership is public or private. In the use of public ownership, distinctions must be made hetween which level of govern- ment owns the land and what the land's dedicated sate or category is, such as perk, forest, at tar forfeited land. It may only be practical to research many of these questions after specific tiles are identified. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT EFFECTS — A hazardous waste disposal facility could attract indmbial do. velopment, especially if the impacted community and ilia State decide to provide incentim to companies to locate near the site. Prolurence may be given to communities that desire such development and have sufficiently large industrial park locations available. Some of the issues raised by this and other factors will be the subject of a report the WMB will prepare for the Legislative Commission on Waste Management on the mitigation of local efforts of hozardom wave facilities. This report will Int prepared jointly with citizens hoer the candidate site rommunilirs, rind may recommend that the I.egislature consideu such programs as tax relief, reimbursement for public services, or incenlives for industrial development. PRODUCTIVITY OF THE LAND FOR VARIOUS USES — Land is a natural resource, and some land is noon suited for certain sou than others. Possible uses to consider are agriculture, forestry, mining, wildlife habiutl, and public enjoyment of natural anvironment. The WMn may have to masa hard choices betnren sites and uses because one candidate site may be good for one use, and anothar candidate iiia may tie gond for another use. 'To choose batwotzs then different uses, factors to consider include: the relative productivity of the candidatesite lot the particular use, the availability of other suitable land for that use, and the emphasis that the people of the Development Region and the State went to place on the different Possible uses. It should be noted that the Legislature his decided that no land may be excluded from consideration for a site unless it is unlikely to quality for a Pollution Control Agency permit. WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD SITIIIG TIMETABLE Disposal Facilities November, 1980. The Waste Management Board (NMB) notifies communities in search areas for hazardous waste disposal facilities. November, 1980 - May, 1981. Public meetings will be held in each Development Region to discuss and recommend siting criteria to ti+e NMB. May, 1981. The WMB must propose six or more candidate sites for commercial hazardous waste disposal facilities. May, 1981 - August, 1981. Additional meetings as well as hearings wit] be held in the Development Regions on the proposed candidate sites. - August, 1981. The WMB will select six candidate sites in six different 'counties --one per county. Subsequently, the Governor will appoint a Local Project Review Committee from each affected county to act as a communication link between the affected community and the involved state agencies to relay information and local concerns. Each Local Project Review Committee must select a temporary voting member to serve on the Waste Management Board to represent his or her community in the siting deliberations of the WMB. January, 1982. The WMB will present two reports to the Legislative Commission on Waste Management, after consultation with the Local Project Review Com- mittees and after a public meeting in each affected county. One report will be on mitigation of local effects of a hazardous disposal facility, and will propose ways to reduce local impacts and compensate the host communities. The other report will be on hazardous waste management, and will contain a draft hazardous waste management plan and a proposed certificate of need for one or more disposal facilities. - May, 1982. The WM0 will Issue a certificate of need for hazardous wast: disposal facilities that will specify the size and types of disposal facilities to be built at one or more of the candidate sites. September, 1982. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency will complete environmental Impact statements on disposal facilities at each of the six candidate sites. - Spring, 1983. The WMB will select one or more of the sites for disposal fact Iities, after hearings in each county, discussions with affected local governments and others, and after consideration of the Pollution Control Agency's environmental Impact statements. Processing Facilities June I, 1981. The WMB will propose at least 9 sites to appear on a hazardous waste processing site Inventory, Including (1) three incineration sites, (2) three chemical processing sites, and (3) three transfer and storage sites. November I, 1981. The WMB will prepare a final Inventory of processing sites. t 14EETING NOTICE Hazardous Waste Disoosol Site Search Area Notification An important meeting regarding this notification will be held In Development Region 741 at 7:00 p,m. on December 10, 1980. 1t will be held at: City Council Chambers St. Cloud, Minnesota For further information please contact the Waste hiananement Board at 7323 - 58th Avenue North, Crystal, Minnesota 55428, or co 11 612/536-0816 . 7 162 GENERAL FUND AM0UNT CHECK NO. Central- McGowan, Inc. - Cyl. rental 2.40 13689 Barco Municipal Products - Snow plow blade - nuts s bolts 261.94 13690 Water Products - Hydrant parts 6 2 doz. meter valves 518.42 13691 Fair's Garden Center - Tree wrap 7.76 13692 HOglund Bus Co. - 75 Int' 1. truck repairs 11.85 13693 Maus Tire Service - Tire repair 9.00 13694 MacQueen Equipment - St. sweeper repair parts 381.53 13695 Marco Business Products - Copy paper 116.50 13696 National Bushing - Misc. supplies 75.67 13697 Arve Grimsmo - Oak Ridge Civil Defense conf. expenses 104.46 13698 Maus Foods - Paper towels, cups, coffee, cleaning supplies, etc. 81.84 13699 Lindberg 6 Sons - Paint for Mtce. Bldg. 360.75 13700 Harry's Auto Supply - Hoses, clamps, filters, etc. 161.48 13701 Jean Brouillard - Fuel , gear lube, grease 593.97 13702 Gerald Schmidt - Steel for wood shed at Mtce. Bldg. 112.50 13703 Figs It Shop - Nylon line for trimaer 10.00 13704 Monticello Ready Mix - 5 yds. cement at Mtce. Bldg. 207.50 13705 Brenteson Construction - 170 c.y. salt -sand mix 1105.00 13706 Audio Communications - Radio repair 13.00 13707 Carol A. Palmer - Deposition copy of Flake bldg, appeal 86.25 13708 Walt Mack - Mileage to seminar in Bloomington 20.00 13709 Foster's Ins. Agency - Bonds for emp. & increase in W. Comp. 2803.42 13710 Tri State Drilling - Float s repairs to lift pump in Bridge Pk. 725.22 13711 OSM - Misc. engineering fees- 80-1, 80-2, drainage, pk.lot, etc 7981.13 13712 Wright County Auditor - S police fines - October 1303.25 13713 Our Own Hardware - Misc. supplies for Mtce. Depts. 126.31 13714 Monticello Office Products - Misc. office supplies 85.96 13715 Scan Hancock - Mileage 6 6 cyl. engine for truck 144.60 13716 Gross Industrial Services - laundry 122.40 13717 Viking Pipe Services Co. - Cleaning sewer lines 6118.23 13718 Bridgewater - Telephone ($92.16 to be reimb. by OSM) 670.99 13719 Monticello Printing - Printing election ballots s lib. booklets 254.75 13720 Rick Wolfsteller - Misc. mileage 37.47 13721 MN. Rescue 6 First l.id Assoc. - Annual dues - Civil Defense 7.50 13722 Buffalo Bituminous - Blacktop 6 Class 5 4960.99 13723 H A S Asphalt - 9 tons blacktop 144.00 13724 State Treasurer - State Auditor's office- Reg. fee for seminar 50.00 13725 Intl. City Management Assoc. - Annual sub. 120.00 13726 Feed Rite Controls - Alum. Sulfate, phosphates, testing 1831.18 13727 Fidelity Bank 6 Trust - 74 Parking Bond interest 3275.95 13728 Equitable Life Assurance Society of U. S. - Ins. premiums 40.00 13729 Viking's Approved Safety Products - Safety mirror 42.36 13730 Olson Electric - Service calls at lift station 47.00 13731 Wright County Ilighway Dept. - Sand bays 5 mix for Civil Defense 100.00 13732 American National Bank 6 Trust - 19GO Bond - interest 245.00 13733 Earl F. Anderson & ASSOC. - Posts and mine. signs 302.54 13754 Flexible Pipe Tool Co. - Sewer rodder blades 68.00 13735 MN. State Treasurer - Surplus property fund - Misc. tools 35.10 13736 Cargill Salt Division - 45 tons salt 1423.60 13737 Soil Test, Inc. - Concrete Slump test kit 109.16 13738 Hotay Equipmont Co. - !lose, switch, valvo for pressure waahor 188.65 13739 Payroll for October 16144.74 TOTAI. DISBURSEMENTS $456,103.99 162 GENGRAI. FUND NOVEMBER - 1980 AMOUNT CIII:CK N0. Burlington Northern R. R. - Permits for W. W. T. P. construction 400.00 13616 Smith s Pringle - Legal fees 661.50 13619 Loren Klein - Mileage 167.00 13620 U. S. Postmaster - Library Const. fund postage (brochures) 195.00 13621 MN. State Treasurer - PERA 2445.86 13622 Corrow Sanitation - Contract for sanitation service 3450.00 13623 Gwen Bateman - Animal imp. expense 467.50 13624 Commercial West - Adv. for Chamber of Commerce 315.00 13625 Arve Grimsmo - Mayor salary 125.00 13626 Dan Blonigon - Council salary 100.00 13627 Mrs. Fran Fair - Council salary 100.00 13628 Ken Maus - Council salary 100.00 13629 Dr. Phil White - Council salary 100.00 13630 James Preusse - Cleaning city hall 180.00 13631 YMCA - Contract payment for outreach program 208.33 13632 Wright County State Bank - Investments 237586.81 13633 Security Federal Savings s Loan - Investments 55000.00 13634 Wright County State Bank - Investments 50000.00 13635 Wright County State Bank - I-WT 3003.00 13636 Loren Klein - Reimb. for election expense (food for judges) 28.76 13637 Election judges wages 1029.38 13638-59 MN. State Treasurer - SWT 2809.70 13660 MN. State Treasurer - PERA 1039.27 13661 MN. State Treasurer - License Center - Dep. Reg. fees 58.00 13662 Suburban Gas - Propane for dog pound 280.54 13663 Hayes Contractors - Payment on 60-1 6 80-2 construction 34020.93 13664 Monticello Historical Committee - Supplies for (list. Center 200.00 13665 MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees 60.00 13666 Relocation Realty Service - Reimb. ass mt. not taken off books 145.67 13607 Banker's Life Ina. - Group Ins. payment 1652.45 13G68 Northern Statas Power - 3 poles for lights at commuter lot 326.61 13669 Johnson Plastics - Magnetic tape for board at Ilist. Center 38.82 13G70 Monticello Times - Misc. publishing 6 election ballots 361.85 13671 Roger Mack - Mileage around town 10.20 13672 John Simola - Local mileage 12.20 13673 Elk Rivur Concrete - Culvert for Ritza FIanor driveway 357.60 13674 U. of M17. Reg. - Conference for Roger flash s John Simola 147.00 � 13675 Northwestern Boll - Fire phone 13.08 13676 Phillips Petro. - Brake fluid 3.90 13677 Drew Chemical Corp. - Chemicala for feed equipment 892.39 13678 North Central Public Service - Utilities 185.66 13679 Jim's Rail Shop - Iland rail at warming house - 4th St. park 80.00 13680 Mobil Oil - Anti freeze, gas cap, fire ext.,,towing 96.40 13681 Ernie's Bait - 4 pr. rubber gloves 66.00 13602 B J's Diacount Market - Dog food, cleaning supplies, coffee, 46.34 13683 Davis Electronic Service Co. - Pager repairs 6 6 sots of batt. 70.21 13684 Amoco Oil - Goa for bucket machine 4.76 13605 Howard Dahlgren Assoc. - October planning billing 20.75 1368G Electromatics, Inc. - Traffic light repair 105.00 13687 Northern States Power - Utilities 3384.16 13688 A LIQUOR FUND Payroll for October 2873.30 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS FOR NOVEMBER $189,760.90 .51 AMOUNT CHECK LIQUOR DISBURSEMENTS - NOVEMBER NO Commissioner of Revenue - Sales tax 2283.85 9456 Smith 6 Pringle - Legal fees 9.00 9457 State Treasurer - PERA 234.95 9458 City of Monticello - Transfer out 100401.42 9459 Wright County State Bank - Fed. W/11 tax 426.50 9460 VOID -- 9461 Wright County State Bank - Investments 20000.00 9462 State Treasurer - PERA 121.10 9463 MN. State Treasurer - FICA 310.08 9464 Ed Phillips s Sons - Liquor 6481.65 9465 Griggs, Cooper - Liquor 5242.27 9466 Ed Phillips 6 Sons - Liquor 13G48.04 9467 Johnson Bros. - Liquor 155.24 9468 Old Peoria Co. - Liquor 954.85 9469 Twin City Wine - Liquor 3138.16 9470 Northern States Power - Utilities 562.24 9471 Griggs, Cooper - Liquor 2849.40 9472 Dept. of Public Safety - Liquor permit fee 5.00 9473 Yonak Sanitation - Contract 40.00 9474 Banker's Life Ins. - Group Ins. 200.67 9475 Dahlheimer Dist. - Beer 5567.13 9476 A. J. Ogle - Beer 437.75 9477 Grosslein Beverage- Beer 9410.23 9478 Dick Beverage - Beer 7666.30 9479 Day Dist. Co. - Beer 161.60 9480 7 Up Bottling Co. - Misc. mdse. 219.70 9481 Jude Candy 6 Tobacco - Misc. mdse. 482.25 9482 Thorpe Dist. Co. - Beer 3383.45 9483 Old Dutch Foods - Misc. mdse. 139.79 9484 Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone 52.27 9485 Maus Foods - Misc. supplies 13.41 9486 Rich's Heating 6 Air Cond. - Install gas conversion burner 1053.57 9487 City of Monticello - S/W billing 173.80 9488 Foster'a Ins. Agency - Workmen Comp. add. premium 139.58 9489 Trushonski Trucking - Freight 439.30 9490 Viking Coca Cola - Misc. mdoo. 483.05 9491 Payroll for October 2873.30 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS FOR NOVEMBER $189,760.90 .51 COUNCIL UPDATE November 24, 1980 Meeting V Simplification of Variance Procedures - Gary Wicber. Currently, the Planning Commission is working on a possible recommendation to the City Council to simplify the procedure for obtaining a variance. specifically when the applicant and surrounding property owners are in agreement with the variance requested. Part of this process would be to have the Planning Commission hold the public hearings for all variances. These are currently held at the Council level. Unless the decision by the Planning Commission was appealed either by the applicant or any individual , the decision of the Planning Commission would be final. There would be a set number of days under which appeal would have to be filed with the zoning administrator, and if appeal were filed, the matter would go before the City Council. It should be pointed out that this is consistent with State Statutes allow- ing the Planning Commission to serve as the Board of Appeals. In some cities, the actual Planning Commission serves as the final authoritative body. However, in other cities, appeals can be made to the City Council, and the Planning Commission felt that this would still give any applicant or property owner that prerogative . However, it would simplify matters greatly where there might be a sid eyard setback or other variances request `!l that isn't contested and approved by the Planning Commission. Once the Planning Commission's final recommendations are completed, they will be for- warded to the City Council for their consideration. Additional Line - Wright County Sheriff' a Deaarment - Gary Wicber. As a result of the recent inquiry by the City of Monticello, it should be pointed out that the Wright County Sheriff's Department is establishing a second Monticello line on the 295-2533 number. This will double the capacity of incoming calls to the Wright County Sheriff's Department. Additionally, Bridgewater Telephone Company will be putting in their telephone book not only the 295-2533 number, but also the alternative numbers which are 682-1162 and 682-1163. Status of Commuter Parking Lot - John Simola, Public Works Director The Commuter Parking Lot Itas been graded and a 4" Class V surface has been installed in the outlined area shown on the plans. Two items of concern were noted during grading, as folLowe: 1. The contractor, Veit. Inc., ran out of suitable material for the fill areas, and the parking lot had to be lowered 6" to make up the differ- ence., resulting in extra excavation. Council Update - 11/24/80 2. The specifications contained a typographical error showing a bid quantity of 300 tons of crushed Class V when, in reality, it should have shown 1,300 tons. This would have resulted in a $7,000 over -run putting the job over the $10,000 amount for bidding purposes. To offset this alightly, I negotiated a price of $5.40 per ton for standard Class V, which resulted in a cost savings of $2,080 for this portion. This material is more susceptible to spring break-up; however, we can, in my opinion, overcome this by good drainage and grading. The lighting system is in the process of being completed, and signs have been ordered to denote the lot's purpose and mark the entrances. - 2 - 0 C MINUTES RLCULAR MELTING - MONT (CELLO CITY COUNCIL November 10. 1980 - 7:30 P.M. Members Present: Arve Cri_msmo, Dan Ulunigcn, Fran Fnii, Ken Maus, Phil White. Members Absent: None 1. Canvassing Board on Circ City of MUOLiL'ello'a EleCtion. Motion was made by Ken Maus, seconded by Phil White and unanimously car'r'ied to declare Arve Grimsmo elected to a two -year term as Mayor with Dan Blonigen and Kenneth Maus elected to four-year terms as Council Members in the November 4, 1980 City Election, and also, that the referendum on the Library issue passed 749 to 582. (See Exhibit 10/10/80 W. 2. Consideration of Excr Cising Option nn Dowling Property. Prior to Lite November 4, 1980 referendum bund issue un building a library, the City of Monticello entered into a hutchase agreement for the option on purchasing the Hubert and Clara Dowling property adjacent Lo the propelled Site for the new library. The option gave the City of Monticello until November 15, 1980 to determine if it would nxcrcisu Lhc option and purchase the property. Kith the bond issue referendum being approved of the General Election November 4th, Mr. howling indicated that It,- would be willing Lo elus.- on the property pnoni bly by Docember I, 19HO if the City dc:aired. Motion was made by 1'liil White, seconded by Fran rair and unanimously carried to proceed with exercising the. option Ln purchnsa the Dowling property for $70,ODU, With a note that the 30-dtry nuLice Thal the. pro- perty Could be closed in leas than 30 days at Llro diuCretion of the City Administrator if- Mr. Dowling is ready to move. 3. Approval of Transferb. This item was Lo cons ider Council approval of Lire following transfers Which should be made prior to December 31, 1980: I FROM TO Capital Outlay Revolv. Fire Revenue Sharing Sewer e . ' a Council Minutes - 11/10/80 -- t AMOUNT COMMENT $ 37,168.20 For the City of Monticello's share (83.48%) of the total cost of the mini -pumper $ 89,000.00 Transfer of 1979 appropriation dedicated to the sewer fund for the construction of the up- dating of the Wastewater Treatment Plan. 1977 Special Asmt. 1977 Debt $ 18,986.97 Transfer unused portion of bond Redemption proceeds to debt retirement fund. Motion was made by Dan Blonigen, seconded by Fran Fair and unanimously carried to approve the above transfers. 4. Review of Liquor Store Financial Statements for the Third Quarter of 1980. The City Council reviewed with Mark lrmiter, Manager of the Liquor Store, the Nine Month Financial Statements for 1980. It was noted by Mr. lrmiter that for the first nine months of 1980, sales were up $83,000, or almost 172 over 1979 figures, with gross profit also increasing approximately 17%, or $16,500. In addition, Mr. lrmiter noted that sales could be close to $800,000 at the end of the year if the present percentage increases continue. Other than review, no notion was taken by the C ameil. 5. Consideration of Assistance for ABC Day Care _Center. The ABC Day Care Center, which was located in the Oakwood School Building, closed their doers Friday, November 7, 1980, due to a financial problem. As of this time, Marcella Corrow, operator of the ABC Day Care Center, has not found an alternative site for continuing the day care center that would be financially feasible for herself. As a result, a number of the parents in the community and outlying areas that use the facility petitioned to the City Council for assistance, either financially or otherwise, in helping establish a new day care center within the City. Mr. Dennis Frank, spokesman for the parent~ `roup present at the Council, naked the City for any type of assistance that they could provide either financially or otherwise, or for ideas on how the group could proceed to establish a now day care center. Mr. Frank indicated that this service is very much needed within Monticello, and hoped that some type of arrangement could be made for re-establishing a day care center. - 2 - Council Minutes - 11/10/80 City Administrator, Cary Wicber, noted to the group that some programs are available through both the Social Services in the Wright County Courthouse, and also through the State of Minnesota for grants for such types of organizations. The State makes grants available to non-profit organizations to help in establishing day care centers. Wright County Social Services has Title 20 funds available for low and moderate income people to help defray the cost of these individuals in paying for day care services. Terry Ludders spoke to the Council and indicated that although many of the users of the day care center are township residents or from other communities, she felt that these families do patronize the local Monticello businesses and therfore, the City should think about supporting a day care center as they do with a Senior Citizens Center. Although the Council noted that a day care eeno-r operation is a needed part of the community aspect, it was also noted it would be hard for taxpayer's funds to be used to suppurc such an entity, and therefure, no action was taken by the Council other than letting the group know what grants and programs are available through other agencies. 6. Consideration of Setting Special Meeting Date for Reviewing Non -Union Employee's 1981 Salaries. A salary negotiating meeting was set for December 2, 1980 beginning at 6:30 P.M., at which time the Council would review with specific non-union employees and their immediate supervisor to determine a salary for each employee for 1981. It was noted that this meeting with the individual employees would be for all non-union employees other than office secretarial help. Motion was also made by Phil White, seconded by Dan Dluuipen and unani- cuusly carried to cancel the second regularly scheduled Council Meeting for December 22, 1980, 7. Approval of Minutes. Motion was made by Phil White, seconded by Ken Maus and unaninwusly carried to approve the Minutes of the regular meeting held October 27, 1980, contingent upon Item 16, in regards to the propused commuthr parking lot, last paragraph, being clianged to read as follows: "it was noted that NSP would sell the transformer and poles to the City, ss needed, and that the City would request bids for the electrical installation and huuk- up, including lights." - 3 7 Council Minutcs - IL/10/80 8. Radiological Emergency Response Plan. Loren Klein, Civil Defense Director, requested that the Council con- sider approving and signing the rough draft of the radiological emergency response plan for the City of Monticello. Mr. Klein noted chat according to State regulations, the City Council must authorize someone to sign the plan, thus approving the preliminary plans to date. Motion was made by Dan Blonigen, seconded by Ken Maus and unanimously carried to authorize the Mayor to sign tho preliminary Radiological Emergency Response Plan, as recommended by the Civil Defense Director. 9. Discussion on Future Site of Library during Interim Construction. With the approval of the recent bond issue and the ultimate construction of a new library within the next year, the Library Committee recently met and suggested that the library be moved from the present Oakwood Building to City Mall Council Chambers, as a temporary location. Reason for the move was that the Oakwood Building would be too costly to heat for just the library uscage during the winter months, and possibly the library would be demolished prior to the new library being constructed. Motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Ken Maus and unanimously carried to approve using the Council Chambers in tile- City Hall as a temporary location for the library until the new facility was complCLed. Also, in regard# to the new library, a motion was made by Phil White, seconded by Fran Fair and unanimously carried to authorize the architect, Merrill Birch 6 Associates, to proceed with preparation of final piano and specifications for the new proposed library. the final plans would then be reviewed by the, Council prior to snbmissiun lur bids. 10. Miscellaneous. Council Members discussed the future plans fur the recently acquired Oakwood School Building and requested that Clio City Staff prepare a report on the items of salvage in the building, and what plan should be used for removal of the building, such ah taking bids fnr demolition, or selling the building to the highest bidder, etc. A list of the items salvageable and useable to the City will be prepared along with tilt- possible hepossible alternatives for removal of the building. In regards to Building Code violations dt the old Monti,:llu Mord site, it was the consensus of the Council members to requo•at that the State Building Inspector be asked to cheek out the building himself for violation■ to see if they Coincide with the City's building inspettor'e report. Meeting /adjourned. W 4�,,k lolfst ller, Asst. Admin. TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Gary Wieber, City Administrator v SUBJECT: Salary Meeting - Tuesday, December 2, 1980 - 7 P. M. Purpose of this meeting is to review and set salaries for non-union em- ployees for 1981. Similar to last year's meeting, each employee is scheduled for a 15 to 20 minute session and the schedule is as follows: 7;10 P. 14. Karen Hanson 7:30 P. M. Walter Mack 7:50 P. M. Roger Mack 8:10 P. M. John Simola 8:30 P. M. Rick Wolfsteller 8:50 P. M. Loren Klein 9:10 P. M. Mark rrmiter 9:30 P. M. Gary Wieber Listed below is the salary history of each employee to be interviewed and the recommendation of the City Administrator. In the case of Walt Mack and Roger Mack, the recommendation is that of the Public Works Director and City Administrator. Roeommend EMPLOYEE 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 s, ren Hanson S 400.00 S 430.00 S 450.00 $ 475.00 $ 550.00 8 725.00 $ 825 Walter Mack 887.40 936.00 1,016.66 1,150.00 1,250.00 1,412.50 1,600 N • Roger Mack 1,250.00 1,437.50 1,625 v4 Mark Irmiter 1,000.00 1,100.00 1,232.00 1,416.66 1,666 .67 1,883. Loren Klein 1,050.00 1,185.00 1,500 .00 1,625. John Simola 1,500.00 1,785.00 2,01E Rick Wolfstoller 750.00 025.00 1,000.00 1,120.00 1,291.66 1,542 .00 1,750 Gary Wieber 1 ,500.00 1,625.00 1,791.66 1,958.33 2,250.00 2,500 .00 These recommendations were based on the following factorsi A. Present salary. B. Competitive salaries of similar postions within city goverment. C. Performance. D. Cost of livin.i. (According to the Dept. of labor, the CPI Index increased from 221. 5 to 250.6 in the loin City area in the last year or an increase of 13.13a). It would reel the$— one way to proceed is to allow the empinyer and supervisor to give a brief review of the performance and salary requests prior to council de- liberation. • On hourly scale prior to 1979. 0 I- AS you may recall, last year we established a schedule which follows, for administrative clerical personnel. Hangs (lours Top Bite 1008 $5.30 - `•5.60 hour Cmer 4160 (Equivalent to 2 years full time) 90% $4.77 - $5.04 hour 2080-4160 (Between 1-2 years) 809 $4.24 - $4.48 hour 0 - 2080 hours (Less than one year) i would recommend Cha schedule L: adopted as follows for 1981: Top Bate 100% 90% BOIL N.lnyu 56. UO - $6.30 $5.40 - :5.67 $4.80 - $5.04 E:MILOY E Eill L2LB 1979 1180 or. lianson 00. 00 5 430.00 5 450.00 �'� 475.00 $ 550M 725.0( 13.9 '-1-S 1,050.00 1.412.`10 1.600.00 W 0. 1 t. L r sack G87.40 914.00 1,016.66 1 1 SC).00 &I 19Z 1�b 25 II.S Roger mack 1,250.00 1.437 .1.0 .00 0 2 2 *Z inviter 11000.00 1.100.00 1,232.00 1,416.66 1 .,566.67 S / Loren Klein 1,050.00 1,105.00 1,500-00 1,625.00 9-0 2 P92Y *01m Simol. 1,500.00 1,785.00 2.01 R, 75 13,1 "2.,7 .2 y Pick Wolf5t,e I le.r 750.U0 825.00 1,000.00 1.120.00 1,191.6+5 1,542-00 1,750.00 17A 7 3,) 3— ra-,7 1;iebrr 1,500.00 1,625.00 1,7-31.66 1,958.32 _,250.00 2,5LO - 00 These rucommendat%ons were based on the follovirui :actors: n. Present Jalary. D. Com.petitive salaries of si:aiI.,r potitons cic-.., qo,.,!rn:rQnL. C. Per r oma :,, ce - cc!; t Qf 1 i " i n'. to the nept, of unc c?, increased from 221 .. to Ir. tho -win C' ty arca in the law. Y,hr Or an increase U. It. 'OnId !J,;Cm omt one way to prod!.!( is to allow the enploy-m a;,d supezv;5o: tc, a hr.'ef review of the pez-formAnc, and salary ri:quc--q prior to covncil bent tan. • On hourly 5,.mje prior to 1979. .4 "JA