City Council Agenda Packet 01-24-1983�._
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
January 24, 1983 - 7:30 P.M.
Mayor: Arve A. Grimsmo.
Council Members: Jack Maxwell, Fran Fair, Dan Blonigen, Ken Maus.
1.
Call to Order.
2.
Minutes.
3.
Citizens Comments/Petitions, Requests, and Complaints.
4.
Public Hearing - Meadow Oak.
Old Business.
5.
Consideration of a Call for Bids for Public Improvements for
Meadow Oak Subdivision.
A .
Consideration of n Pnrannnol Tcene a,.ggrding Mr. inrnn rinin.
7.
Consideration of Setting a Special Meeting for the Purpose of
Conducting Evaluation sessions with Various City Consultants.
B.
Consideration of an Option from the HRA for the Purpose of a
Housing Development.
New Business.
9.
Consideration of a Mutual Aid Fire Agreement with the City of
Clearwater.
10.
Consideration of an Application for a Conditional Use - Applicant:
Mr. Michael DeBoer.
It.
Ratification of the Membership of the Senior Citizen Council and
the historical Society.
12.
Department Head Reports: YMCA Detached Worker, Senior Citizens
Center Director (Tentative), Fire, taw Enforcement, Public Works,
Planning/Zoning, Finance, Administration.
13.
Consideration of Change Ordors 081, 084, 085 and 006.
14.
Consideration of Approval of Fire Contract with Silver Crook Town-
ship for 1984 through 1986.
C15.
Consideration of an Appointment to fill the position of Wastewater
Mochanic/laboror.
16.
Approval of January Bills.
17.
Adjournment.
_ MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELL.O CITY COU14CIL
January 10, 1983 - 7:30 P.M.
Members Present: Arve Grimsmo, Jack Maxwell, Fran Fair, Ken
Maus, Dan Blonigen.
Members Absent: !Lone.
2. Oath of Office - Officers Elected in November.
The oath of office was given to Council Members Jack Maxwell
and Fran Fair along with the recently re-elected Mayor Arve
Grimsmo. (See Exhibit R1).
3. Approval of the Minutes of the December 13th, 1982 Reaular
Meeting.
A motion was made by Fair, seconded by Maus to approve the
minutes of the regular meeting held December 13, 1982.
Voting in favor were Fair, Maus and Grimsmo, with Blonigen
and Maxwell abstaining as they were not present at the last
meeting.
5. Meadow Oak - Continuation of a Public Hearing.
). It was the consensus of the Council to continue the public
hearing on the proposed extension of public utilities to the
Meadow Oak Subdivision until the developers of the property
finalize their ownership in the land involved until Jan-
uary 24th, 1983.
G. Consideration of a Personnel Issue Concerning Mr. toren Klein.
The Mayor acknowledged that Mr. Klein was present but before
proceeding at length requested that Eidem bring the Council
update. Eidem summarized the course of events that had
occurred indicating that on the morning of November 15th,
the Council mot and after some discussion at that time were
in general agreement that termination proceedings should
be initiated, but that he (Eidem) had suggested the Council
mandate a leave of absence and an evaluation for Mr. Klein.
He noted that Mr. Klein agreed to that provision. Eidem
explained that the original intent was for the City to on -
gage someone to do the evaluation and as a result would have
access to information that could help in their decision.
Eidem presented to the Council a latter from Abbott North-
waotern Hospital explaining that the original intent had
Loan loot within the hospital communication channels and as
c�
a
Council Minutes - 1/10/83
such the therapist working with Klein knew nothing of the in-
tended arrangement and felt that Klein was not his client and
he was unable to reveal confidential information for the
Council's benefit. It was noted that the City was not paying
for the evaluation sessions but rather Klein's insurance was.
Eidem noted that in spite of the confusion the matter may now
be simplified in that it is Klein's obligation in order to be
reinstated from his leave of absence to provide to the City
Council a doctor's certificate pronouncing him suitable to
resume his duties. Once reinstated the Council would be
required to make a second decision concerning whether or not to
commence termination proceedings. Mr. Klein stated that
though he went to his doctor's office, the doctor was not
in and he was not able to secure a doctor's certificate at
that time. The question was raised by several members of
the Council as to whether or not the City should allow Klein
to pick another therapist to work with but that the City
would in fact pay and thus have access to the evaluation or
assessment. Eidem raised the point that such a step might
be more confusing to the issue when in fact all that would
really be required at this time would he the doctor's cer-
tificate. Following approval of that certificate, the Council
reiterateA, nnA rhe cOe ld cc=cnce termination pi,:,peaAinyb.
Once termination proceedings were begun, then Mr. Klein could
present medical evidence on his own behalf if he wished to do
that. Eidem noted that should the evidence and data that Mr.
Klein presents during the termination be sufficient, the
Council could stop the termination proceedings at any time.
Eidem suggested to the Council that the entire matter be
turned over to the City Attorney to prepare the legal frame-
work for reinstatement and/or termination proceedings for
January 24th, 1983. City Attorney Pringle was present and
stated that he would in these early stages accept tho task
but recommended that the City investigate hiring an outside
attorney to handle this matter, since 1) he may be called as
a witnona and 2) his working relationship with Loren,
should ho be reinstated, could be severely jeopardized if
he is in a position of assisting with the termination. Klein
spoke briefly to the Council explaining why the certificate
was not available on this day and explaining that he would
do whatever was possible to secure that permit by the 24th
or earlier. lie stated that in his opinion, the Council members
were not only his employers but his friends. A motion by Fair,
seconded by Blonigon and carried unanimously to 1) extend the
leave of absence with pay until January 24th and 2) to turn
the entire matter over to the City Attorney in order to pro -
pars the legal framework for termination proceedings. Do -
fore closing the discussion, Eidem noted that it was im-
portant for the City to proceed in a careful and legal man-
ner so as to protect the rights of both the employee and
2-Q
l
Council Minutes - 1/10/83
the City. fie noted that should termination procec9ings be-
gin, Mr. Klein would have to be paid while not being at work
or performing his duties during the proceedings. He also
noted that it seems as though Mr. Klein qualifies for vet-
eran's preference rights and would be treated as such. Mr.
Klein also requested, at one point, that Eidem be directed
to release any information in his personnel file that his
therapist may request. Klein felt that this would be
essential for the doctor to make a determination relative
to Klein's suitability to return to work.
7. Consideration for a Conditional Use Permit - Dr. Clarence
McCarty.
Dr. Clarence McCarty, who resides at 319 West 3rd St. (Int 2,
Block 37) has requested a conditional use permit to be al-
lowed to establish a commercial retail activity in an R -B
zone. Dr. McCarty requested the permit to be allowed to
open and sell at retail a variety of birds from his pro-
posed pot shop to be located at his home.
According to our zoning ordinance, a conditional use per- ,
mit is required for a retail, commercial activity in an
R -B zone provided that certain conditions are met. Dr.
_ McCarty currently raises birds as a hobby and is request-
ing permission to occasionally sell and buy exotic birds.
In addition, he proposes to occasionally sell related items
such as bird cages, bulk feed, etc. The proposed retail
activity would take place in a separate barn type structure
that is located on the property approximately GO feet from
his home.
Council mem Gars discussed with Dr. McCarty whether lie was
aware that city ordinances require any retail activity
to provide off street parking that is hard surfaced with
curb and gu ttor requirements. It was noted by the
Council that if the business were to exist primarily no
a whole sale business, without retail activity, a vari-
ance could ho granted from the hard surfacing require -
menta but if a retail activity does exist, off street
parking would have to provided. Dr. McCarty noted that
approximatoly 90% of his business is in the whole sale
nature, but felt that he would still like to pursue the
retail portion of the permit. Dr. McCarty also indi-
catod that possibly some type of arrangement could be
made with the adjacent property owner, Kra. Darwin
Straw, who operates a gift shop to use a portion of her
parking lot on a sharing basis.
3_o
Council Minutes - 1/10/83
The Planning Commission previously recommended that the con-
ditional use permit be granted provided that: 1) the busi-
ness be a family business only with only family members
employed; 2) the retail activity be associated only with
birds and not be open to other animals associated with a
normal pet store and; 3) that off street parking be pro-
vided.
ro-
vided.
As a result of the discussion, a motion was made by Fair,
seconded by Blonigen and unanimously carried to approve the
conditional use permit for the retail activity of a bird
shop (aviary) for a period of one year at which time it
will be reviewed and also to grant a one year variance
from the requirement of hard surfacing of parking areas,
which will also be reviewed at the end of one year.
S. Consideration of Chanqe orders 0131, 82 and 83 with the Paul
A. Laurence Company.
The following change orders with the Paul A. Laurence Com-
pany on the wastewater Treatment Plant construction pro-
ject were reviewed with the Council.
Change Order eel invulveu rosluration of the property be-
tween the new fence and Hart Boulevard along with other
sodding and seeding outside the limits of the original
fence line. The estimated coat was $6,468.00. In dis-
cussing this change order, the Council recommended that
this item be tabled for further review for more infor-
mation on the cost involved in an effort to get the cost
lower.
Change Order 082 involves the installation of a value in
the sludge lino at the bottom of the clarifiers to re-
strict the free flow of sludge that is now occurring
through the pumps and pumping. The estimated coat is
$3,194.
Change Order 003 in the amount of $3,840 is for the in-
utallation of a drench shower and eyewash station in the
immediate work area of the laboratory and boiler room
where chemicals are stored, mixed and used.
A motion was made by Maus, seconded by Fair and unanimous-
ly carried to approve change 'orders 082 and 083 with the
Paul A. I,atlLonce Company on the wastowator Treatment con-
tiact in the amount of 87,034 with change ardor 081
being tabled at the present time for more information on
coat.
Coumcil Mintues - 1/10/83
In a related item concerning the wastewater Treatment Plant
property, it was the general consensus of the Council to rent
the recently purchased Lindberg home for $350 a month as soon
as the materials being stored in the home can be moved to the
wastewater Treatment Plant. The general consensus of the
Council was that the Lindberg home would not be sold or
moved but would be kept at its present location to be used
as rental property.
9. Consideration of Annual Appointments.
Minnesota Statutes require that at the first meeting of the
new year, certain appointments must be made by the City
Council. A schedule of the current Monticello functions,
camnitties, and duties were reviewed by the Council.
Current Planning Cosanission members Jim Ridgeway and John
Bondhua have previously indicated a desire to resign from
the commission but Mr. Ridgeway has indicated a willingness
to serve temporarily during 1983 as Chairman of the Planning
Commission. Mr. John Bondhus has indicated that he would be
available for the January, 1983 Planninq Commission meetinq
( but would prefer that the Council appoint a replacement
effective February, 1983. It was recommended that Mr. Don
Cochran who has expressed interest in being a member of the
Planning Conuniscion be appointed to fill the vacancy that
would be created by John Bondhus's resignation effective
February, 1983.
It was recommended by the Mayor that Council Member Ken Maus
be appointed an the now acting Mayor to replace the previous
acting Mayor, Phil White, who is no longer 3n the Council.
It was also recommended that Dr. Don Maus be appointed as the
health officer for rho City of Monticello.
Mr. Erwin Mallin of the Library [bard has indicated that he
winhos to resign from his position and it was recommended
that Mr. warren Smith he appointed to fill the vacancy on
this board. In addition, Board Members, Pat Schwarz and
Dr. Donald Maus, have indicated a willingness to be ro-
apix>intcd to additional terms on the board.
A motion was made by Maus, seconded by Blonigen and unani-
mously carried to re -appoint all current members as listed
with barren Smith being added to the Library Board to re-
place Erwin Kollin, and Don Cochran being appointod to the
Planning Commission to replace John Bondhua effective
Fohruary, 1983, and Nen Maus being appointed acting Mayor in
replacement of Phil Whito. (Soa Dchibit 42 for comploto
listing of official appointmenta).
Council Minutes - 1/10/83
/J
10. Consideration of a Special Request by OSM for a Payment of
Fees in Fxcess of the Contract Amount.
Mr. John Badalich, Consulting Engineer of OSM, requested
that this item be tabled at the present time until the
engineering firm has had an opportunity to undergo an
evaluation with the City Council in the near future. It
has been recommended that the city consulting engineer
along with the consulting planner and city auditors under-
go an annual evaluation by the City Council to clearly
layout the City's expectations of all consultants for the
year 1983.
11. Approval of the Bills.
A motion was made by Blonigen, seconded by Maus and unani-
mously carried to approve the balance of the bills present-
ed for December, 1982. (See exhibit 03).
12. Consideration of Bid for Removinq house - Monticello Develop-
ment Corporation Property.
John Simola, Public Works Director, informed the Council that
a bid in the amount of $1,400 has been received from Brenteson /
Construction of Big lake for the demolition and removal of the
block house located on portions of Lots 13 and 14, Block 51.
This is the property previously owned by Monticello Develop-
ment Corporation which the City of Monticello has an option
to purchase in the near future. The Development Corporation
partners have expressed interest in having this home do-
molished and removed and it was recommended by the Public
Works Director that the $1,400 bid be accepted. The above
item was approved by consensus of the Council to have
Brontoson Construction remove the home as bid.
13. Miscellaneoun.
City Administrator recommended that the Council appoint two
members of the Council to be on a committee to negotiate with
Security Federal for the purpose of establishing a sale price
of the Oakwood Block. Currently, Security Federal has ox-
prussed interest in purchasing the block and dovoloping the
entire parcel and it was the City AdminiBtrator'o recommenda-
tion that the Council appoint a committee to continue along
with himoolf the negotiations for establishing a sale price
_ -
Council Minutes - 1/10/83
i
t that can be considered by the City Council. By consensus,
Council Members Ren Maus and Jack Maxwell were appointed
to this committee.
Meeting Adjourned.
Gf>e�(�
Rick wolfstelier
Assistant Administrator
c
L
L D
Council Agenda - 1/24/83
AGENDA SUPPLEMENT
4. Public Hearinq - Meadow Oak. (T.E.)
I am sorry to report that once again this hearing must be continued.
Rick and I met with Bob Bemboom on Wednesday, the 19th and dis-
cussed their entire proceedings and final plat. The entire process
is, in fact, starting to come together in an acceptable form. The
plat maps that have been required are in order, and copies have
been submitted to John Uban and John Badalich. However, the final
closing of the sale of the land will not be accomplished by the
24th, and that, of course, is the key to the closing of the public
hearing. Thus, until the sale is completed, this public hearing
should stand as continued.
5. Consideration of a Call for Bids for Public Improvements for
Meadow Oak Subdivision. ME).
Up to this point, the Council has authorized a feasibility study
and the preparation of the plans and specifications for public
improvements in Meadow Oak Subdivision. You have not authorized
the making of those improvements. An authorization to actually
commence construction should not under any case be done prior
to the recording of the plat at the courthouse. However, what
you may do is authorize an advertisement for bids. That is
what is being proposed for this meeting. I spoke on Thursday
with Charles Iapak of OSM and he informed me that the plans
and specs are ccmplate and he will be reviewing them with John
Simola on Friday prior to the meeting. John will be bringing
back copies of those plans and specs for our review. On Monday
night the specs should be reviewed and if acceptable, should be
approved. Once approved, then a call for bids may be made.
This can be done in a single resolution. Calling for bids
prior to actually authorizing the improvement to be made is not
a problem; in fact, several cities will do this on occasion in
order to got more accurate costa before authorizing the improve-
mont. It is not uncommon for the actual bid price to Como in
considerably different from the projected coat arrived at in a
feasibility study. I think it is important that you be aware
that oven though you may elect to call for bids, you aro still
not on an irreversible track that will cause the improvements
to be made. The actual resolution authorizing the improvements
to be made will be done at a much later time.
ALTERNATE ACTIONSi
1. Accept the plane and space for roviow only and defer
any action to the first meeting in February. Presuming
that there might be questions relating to design or
/ that theca might just be a desire to look at the plane
l and spoce in a greater dotail before calling for bids,
this action would give us almost three full weeks to
review and discuss the improvement design.
- 1-
Council Agenda - 1/24/83
of course it would delay the bidding procedure for the
same three week period.
2. Review the plans and specs during the meeting asking
what questions seem evident and adopt a resolution
approving the plans and specs and calling for bids.
This would expedite the matter on behalf of the
Meadow Oak developers since this process may take as
much as six weeks. Again, even when the final bid
tabulation is complete and a contractor has been
selected, no work will be done until the bid is
approved and the improvement is authorized.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: I recommend that, providing a thorough review
of the plans and specs has been done by John Simola and that the
Council is satisfied with that inspection, the plans and specifi-
cations be formally approved by resolution and an advertisement
for bids be authorized within the same resolution.
REFERENCES: Copies of draft letters from the Meadow Oak Developers
outlining the status of their purchasing procedures and itemization
of restrictive covenants and development agreements. A copy of a
resolution approving the plans and specs and calling for bids.
while not included in your agenda packet, a copy of the plans and
specs will be available here at City Hall and I think that they
should also be conaidorod to be a reference.
C _2_
Meadow Oak Limited Partnership
C/o McCombs -Knutson, Inc.
12800 Industrial Park Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55441
1983
City of Monticello
City Hall
Monticello, Minnesota 55362
RE: Ownership of Meadow Oaks Project Land
Gentlemen:
You requested that J provide you with a summary of the
past, present and proposed transactions involving the land
surrounding the Meadow Oaks Project.
1. Past Transactions. The original owners of all of the
land ronstitilting the Meannw Oaks Project and other land %•.ere
Maurice Hoglund and Gladys Hoglund. Since 1975, the following
transactions have occurred:
a. On December 3, 1975, the Hoglunds sold a tract
of land amounting to 600 acres to Jim T. Boyle under a
contract for deed.
b. Jim T. Boyle and Beverly A. Boyle then sold a
one-half interest in, approximately 280 acres of the land
purchased from the Hoglunds to Ronald Offutt of Fargo,
North Dakota in 1976. This 280 -acre parcel does not
include any portion of the proposed Meadow Oaks Project.
C. The Hoglunds then mortgaged the land encumbered
by the contract for deed with the Boyles to the Federal
Land Bank in 1976.
d. The Boyles have agreed to give the Partnership
an option to acquire a 165 -acre tract of the land which
the Boyles purchased from the Hoglunds. The Option Agree-
ment between the Boyles and the Partnership gives the
Partnership the right to acquire this land in increments
by exercising various options over a ten year period. The
Boyles' obligation to give the Partnership this option is
subject to several contingencies.
0
City of Monticello
Page 2
2. Objectives of Boyles And Partnership. The Boyles and
the Partnership recognize that the following requirements must
be satisfied in order for the Project to succeed:
a. Utility services must be provided to the
Project. The proposed utility lines will cross property
owned by the Hoglunds but subject to the Boyle contract
for deed and other property owned free and clear by the
Hoglunds. The Hoglunds will not consent to or provide the
City with easements for these utility lines unless the
Boyles satisfy the contract for deed with the Hoglunds.
b. Offutt will not agree to the installation of
these utility lines unless Offutt receives a substantial
payment from the Boyles.
C. The Partnership will not enter into the Option
Agreement with the Boyles until the Boyles have acquired
fee simple title to the land constituting the Project
subject only to a mortgage containing provisions which
will permit the Partnership to obtain the release of
portions of the land constituting the Project on terms
similar to the terms of the Option and Purchase Agreement
between the Boyles and the Partnership.
3. Proposed Transactions. In order to accomplish the
foregoing objectives, the Boyles, Hoglunds, Partnership and
Offutt are arranging for the following transactions, all of
which will occur more or less simultaneously:
a. Boyle has arranged for a new loan from the
Federal Land Bank covering all of the property which the
Boyles have purchased from the Hoglunds except for the
three outlots designated in the overall plat of the
Project as Outlots B, E and F. The proceeds of this
mortgage will be used to satisfy the contract for deed
with the Hoglunds and to satisfy the original mortgage
which the Hoglunds gave to the Federal Land Bank.
b. The Boyles and the Hoglunds will grant all
necessary easements for the proposed water and sewer lines
which will serve the Project.
C. The Boyles will repurchase the one-half interest
in the 280 -acre parcel which the Boyles originally sold to
Offutts. The Boyles will pay a portion of the repurchase
price in cash and give Offutt a second mortgage to cover
0
( City of Monticello
Page 3
the balance of the repurchase price. This mortgage will
be a second mortgage to the new mortgage to be given by
the Boyles to the Federal Land Bank.
d. The Partnership will pay the Boyles
approximately $170,000. Of this sum, $150,000 will
constitute the entire purchase price for Outlets B, E and
F of Meadow Oaks and the remaining $20,000 will constitute
option money for an option on the remaining portion of the
Project.
4. Status of Real Estate After Transactions. Following
the completion of the above transactions, the following will
occur:
a. The Boyles will be the fee simple owner of all
of the land which the Boyles originally agreed to purchase
from the Hoglunds under the contract for deed except for
the approximate 40 -acre parcel (Outlets B, E and.F) which
the Partnership purchased from the Boyles. The Boyle's
property will, however, be subject to the Federal Land
Bank Mortgage, the Offutt second mortgage, utility
easements running in favor of the City, and the Option
Agreement in favor of the Partnership.
b. The Hoglunds will have no further interest in
the land sold to the Boyles under the contract for deed.
The Hoglunds will, however, retain fee simple title to a
parcel of land lying to the North of the Project subject,
however, to an easement for the proposed sewer line to be
installed on this property.
C. Offutt will hold a second mortgage on the
280 -acre parcel referred to above which lies to the wort
of the site of the Project.
d. The City will hold appropriate easements over
all of the land for the proposed utility lines.
e. The Partnership will own fee simple title to
Outlots P. E and F.
5. Subsequent Transactions. Following the conclusion of
the above transactions, the following will occur:
a. The Boyles, the Partnership, the Federal Land
Bank and the City will join in the execution of the plat
of Meadow Oaks. This plat will then be recorded.
City of Monticello
Page 4
b. The Partnership and the City will execute the
plats of Meadow Oaks Estates and Meadow Oaks Second
Addition and record both plats.
C. The Partnership will have an option to acquire
the remaining portions of the Project from the Boyles and
will commence the development of the Project.
If you have any questions or comments concerning the fork --
going, please contact me.
Very truly yours,
MEADOW OAK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
By Ultra Homes, Inc.
By Hobert j. BumLuum
Executive Vice President and Treasurer
R
Meadow Oak Limited Partnership
c/o McCombs -Knutson, Inc.
12800 Industrial Park Boulevard
Plvmouth, Minnesota 55441
January 18, 1983
City of Monticello
City Hall
Monticello, Minnesota 55362
RE: Proposed Meadow -Oaks Subdivision - Plat Approval
Gentlemen:
This letter is to confirm the discussions and understand-
ings which Meadow Oak Limited Partnership (the 'Partnership')
has reached with officials of the City of Monticello (•City')
concerning various matters which must be satisfied before the
City trill give final plat apprcval to various plats in the
proposed Meadow Oak Development (the 'Project'). This letter
summarizes the conditions which various city officials have
established as a condition of approval of the plate for the
Project.
1. Identification of Plats. The Partnership intends to
record three plats. These plats are as follows:
a. Meadow Oaks - This plat will cover the entire
Project amounting to approximately 165 acres and will be
subdivided into 16 outlets (Outlets A through P). At the
time of recording, the Project will be owned by Jim T.
Boyle and Beverly A. Boyle (Outlots A, C, n, G through P)
and the Partnership (Outlotn B, E and F).
b. Meadow Oaks Estates - This plat will constitute
a replat pf Outlot B and will be suhdivided into large
lots intended for single family dwellings.
C. Meadow Oaks Second Addition - This plat will
constitute a rnplat of Outlet F into small residential
lots intended to serve as homeeitoa for manufactured
housing to be installed by the Partnership.
2. Recordinq Order of Plats. The Partnership and the
Boyles intend to record the overall plat of Meadow Oaks at the
time the Partnership acquires Outlets B, E and F. The Partner-
ship will. acquire Outlets B, E and F by a metes and bounds
description. The Partnership and the Boyles will then join in
City of Monticello
Page 2
the execution of Meadow Oaks, together with the Federal Land
Bank and record Meadow Oaks. It is contemplated that Meadow
Oaks Estates and Meadow Oaks Second Addition will be recorded
shortly after Meadow Oaks has been recorded.
3. Obligations of Partnership. The Partnership will
assume the following responsibilities:
a. Parkland Dedication Requirements. The City has
indicated that the parkland dedication requirements for
the entire Project will be satisfied by the dedication of
outlot E of Meadow Oaks together with the dedication of
the trailways shown upon the development plan for the
entire Proiect. These areas will he dedicated as follows:
i. Outlot E will be deeded to the City
simultaneously with the recording of either Meadow
Oaks Estates or Meadow Oaks Second Addition,
whichever shall be recorded first.
ii. The t railways shown the overall development
plan for the Project will be dedicated in the plat of
each of the outlots of Meadow Oaks as each such
outlot is replated into individual residential lots
and streets.
Although the foregoing will satisfy all parkland dedica-
tion requirements of the City, the Boyles have also agreed
to dedicate Outlot A by deeding Outlot A to the City when
509 of all of the anticipated lots in the Project have
been sold to homeowners.
b. Restrictive Covenants. The Partnership will
prepare and record restrictive covenants encumbering all
of the lots intended to serve as homesites for
manufactured housing containing the following terms:
i. Boats, recreational vehicle and sini)ar
vehicles may not he parked or snored for more than 48
hours during any 30 -day period in the front yard of
any manufactured home lot.
ii. No out -buildings or similar structures may
be arrected or installed in the front yard of anv
manufactured home lot.
iii. The Partnership shall have the right to
impose such other restrictive covenants as it deems
neeossary or proper for a residential subdivision.
Thasa covenants shall be recorded at the same time each
plat of manufactured home lots in recorded.
City of Monticello
Page 3
C. Assessments for Trunk, Water and Sewer Lines.
As.represented by the Boyles to the City, the Partnership
will assume the following obligations with respect to
assessments for the new water and sewer lines which will
be extended to serve the Project:
i. Water Line. The new water line which will
be extended from its present termination point in an
Easterly direction to the site of the Project will be
assessed solely against the property it crosses on a
lineal foot basis. In other words, no portion of the
Project will be assessed for any costs of installing
the main trunk water line from the present termina-
tion point of the water line to the point at which it
intersects with the Westerly boundary of the Project.
The Partnership will, however, agree that the Project
may he assessed for the costs of installing any
portion of the water line within the Project.
ii. Sewer Line. A sewer line will have to be
extended from its present termination point in a
Southerly direction to a point within the Project.
The Partnership will agree to permit all costs of
installing this sewer line to be assessed against the
Project oven though property outside of the Project
will be benefited by the installation of this sewer
line. The City will, however, adopt an ordinance
requiring that any person subsequently connectincl to
the sewer line will be required to pay the City a pro
rata share of the original construction cost and that
the City will forward all such payments to the
Partnership or its successors in interest.
d. Public Improvements within the Project. The
City will contract for and install all public improvements
within Meadow Oaks Estates. These improvements will
include streets, curbs, gutters and water and sewer lines
installed in public rights-of-way. The City, however,
will have no obligation to install any public improvements
within Meadow Oaks Second Addition. Uith respect to the
proposed park (Outlet E), the City will install all
necessary sanitary sewer lines to serve the park while the
Partnership will install water lines, at the. Partnership's
cost.
e. Proposed ManufactureA flames. The Partnership
agrees to submit to the City renderings or other
descriptive literature of the types of manufactured
housing which it intends to install in Meadow Oaks Second
Addition. The Partnership has alreadv submitted materials
describing the products of the two producers of
manufactured homes which the Partnership intends to
install in Meadow Oaks Second Addition, Dvnamic Hoven,
Inc. and Homera, Inr:. If the Partnership elects tr%
3
City of Monticello
Page 4
furnish products from other manufacturers, the Partnership
agrees to provide the City with similar renderings and
descriptive literature from any other producer of
manufactured homes.
f. Submission of Site Plansfor Each Manufactured
Home Lot. The Partnership agrees _ t:o suNmit a drawing to
the City at the time the Partnership applies for a
building permit for each manufactured home showing the
proposed location of the home, garage and all boulevard
trees to be planted by the Partnership.
g. Basements. The Partnership agrees that at least
one-third of all of the manufactured home lots in the
Project will have basements.
h. Sodding. The Partnership will comply with the
following requTrements:
i. Front Yards. The Partnership will sod or
seed the front yard and boulevard of each home within
one year from the date the City issues a certificate
of occupancy for each home errected within the
Project.
ii. Back Yards. The Partnership will obtain an
agreement from each homebuyer within the Project that
the homebuyer will sod or seed the back yard of each
home within one year from the date the homebuyer
closes the purchase of the homebuyer's lot from the
Partnership. The Partnership will not, however, have
any obligation to sod or seed any back yards if the
homeowner fails or neglects to perform such work in
accordance with. the homebuyer 'a agreement with the
Partnership.
i. Plans Already Submitted to City. In addition to
the foregoing, the Partneruhip has already submitted the
following plans to various city officials:
i. Meadow Oaks (overall plat) .
1. Final plat.
ii. Meadow Oaks Estates (Executive Home Sites).
1. Final plat.
2. Grading plan.
2. Street plan. J
iii. Meadow Oaks Second Addition (Manufactured
mom, Sites).
U
C
City of Monticello
Page 5
1. Final plat --together with listing of
all Lots and square footage of each
Lot.
2. Grading, drainage and erosion control
plan.
3. Street plan.
4. Utility plan.
5. Tree preservation and planting plan --
in connection with the landscaping for
the Project, the Partnership agrees
that every lot shall have at least one
tree in the boulevard except that any
corner lot shall have two trees, one
in each boulevard. A1.1 trees
installed in houlevards shall be no
lees than (A) 1h inch in diameter if
the Partnership is obligated to
purchase such trees from a nursery (B)
or less than 2 inches in diameter if
the Partnership is able to utilize any
existing trees on the site or the
Project.
The foregoing represents the Partnership's understanding
of its development obligations in connection with the Project.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact the
undersigned.
Very truly yours,
MEADOW OAA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
By Ultra Homes, Inc.
By
Robert J. Bemboom
Executive Vice President and Treasurer
RESOLUTION 1983-1 !66
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
wHF.RFAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the City Council on Nov-
ember 22nd, 1982, OSM has prepared plans and specifications for the
improvement of a subdivision to be known as Meadow Oak by constructing
sewer and water facilities and streets and appurtant work, and has pre-
sented such plana and specifications to the Council for approval:
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE City Council of Monticello, Minn-
s eota :
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which in attached
hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
Tne C:iry AdminiaLra WL bimii PA:Vje C 01A1 Ca hla .O W .t18u:.a...
in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin, an
advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement
under ouch approved plane and specifications. The advertise-
ment shall be published for 21 days, shall specify the work
to be done, shall state that bide will be received by the
Administrator until io:oo n'.Ie,k e...., -r "- ? /fP7
1983, at which time they will be publicly opened in the Council '
Chambers at the City Hall by the City Administrator and Con-
sulting Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be consider-
ed by the City Council at 7130 P.M. on ntoupry, F�.b• e -9i 19P5o
in the Council Chambers and that no bide will be conaiderod
unless sealed and filed with the Administrator and accompanied
by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check
payable to the Administrator for 5% of the amount of such bid.
ATTESTS
Thomao A. Eidem
City Administrator
Arve A. Grimaaa
Mayor of Monticello
Council Agenda - 1/24/83
I. Consideration of Setting a Special Meeting for the Puroose of
Conductinq Evaluation Sessions with Various City Consultants.
Because this can be a lengthy type of evaluation session and I
think it would be conducive to have a separate session wherein
all the consultants could come in that particular evening, I
am requesting that you set a special date for that purpose.
It occurs to me that unless it is determined that there are
irreconcilable differences between the City and a particular
consultant, the purpose of the evaluation session is to im-
prove the-crkirg relationship and thus, the efficiency of
that working relationship. The consultants, I think, that should
be evaluated are the city engineer, the city planner and the
city attorney. I would like to include in this evaluation
session a 4th person, namely me. At the salary session, you
granted me a substantial salary increase for which I am grate-
ful, and which tells me that my performance has been more than
adequate. I would, however, like to find out if there are
specific tasks that you would like to see me put more effort
into, or improve upon, or alter. I guess what I am saying
basically is that it is comforting to know that in general
my pertormance meets with your approval, but at the same
time, it there are ways that I can improve to do even better,
I would very much like to bu informed of that so I can begin
work on my improvement immediately.
8. Consideration of an Ontion From the NRA for the Purnose of a
11ousinq Development. (T.R.)
As you may recall on December 10th, Mr. Joe Poehler appeared
before the City Council with a procentation for a proposed
elderly housing project. At that time he was directed to go
to the NRA aince he was looking at tax increment finnncing.
On January 5th, Mr. Poohlor came before the IIRA and gave an
in depth presentation of his background, his proposal and
the workings of the Farmers Home Administration who would be
funding the project. Tho IIRA wao faced with making two
decisions, 1) how to act up the mechanics of gotting the
option from the City Council to Mr. Poohlor and 2) whether
or not to investigate tax increment financing. Of course,
proceeding both of th000 decisions was whothor or not the
proposal was a workable proposal. Ono of tho questions
raised wao whether or not that would be a good use for that
pieta of land. It was noted that the construction of that
apartment building would actually create a physical barrier
- 4 -
Council Agenda - 1/24/83
to the growth of commercial in that direction. The HRA determined
before the end of that January 5th meeting that an actual physical
harrier preventing commercial growth in that direction would be
an asset rather than a liability, but the entire project should be
taken to the Planning Commission to get preliminary observations
from them since it would require rezoning. Don Cochran and Jack
Reeve took the proposal to the Planning Commission informally
on January 11th and the Planning Commission stated, without formal
action, that the project seemed feasible as did the rezoning and
they could anticipate lending their support to it. As a result,
the HRA had a special meeting on January 19th to discuss specifi-
cally whether to keep moving with the project and if they de-
cided yes then how to establish the procedure for granting
Poehle r an option and whether or not they would go with a tax
increment finance project. At the 19th meeting, the HRA took
action that determined the project would be effective right
there. The HRA also went over preliminary figures indicating
that tax increment financing would be feasible for the same
amount that would be involved. As to the mechanics for grant-
ing the option, the HRA has done as follows: They adopted a
motion offering to the City $1.00 and other good and valuable
considerations to purchase a contingent option on lets 13, 14
and 15 in Block 51. If that is granted, they will in turn
Otter a contingent option to POehier COY the price of j20U.
The final sale price of the land from the City to the HRA will
be $50,350 plus or minus a small amount. According to the
Farmers Home regulations, the sale price of the land to the
developer from the HRA will then be approximately $32,000 to
$33,000 leaving $17,000 to $18,000 to be recovered through
increment. This is a relatively small amount that needs to
be recovered through tax increment financing and the term is
tents tivo since the reduced assossment credit paid by the State
is questionable, ainco the State is brake. Even, however, if
the State could pay nothing of the reduced assessment credit,
the tax increment district can still be made to work. Ono final
note: The LIRA is requesting action at this mooting in order to
help Mr. Poohlor meet the application deadline for the Federal
government which is on or near the and of January. Ilio appli-
cation packet must contain an option agreement showing that
he does, in fact, have a development site arranged. The option
would also state that it is being granted for the solo purpose
of an application to Farmers home Administration and not for
other use and that if Farmers home does not grant the loan than
the option will be terminated.
- 5 -
Council Agenda - 1/24/83
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Grant a contingent option to the NRA for a $1.00 and other
good and valuable considerations with the total sale price
of the land being 550,350. The NRA is requesting a one
year option and by them having the option whether or not
the Poehler development proceeds, they would still have
some autonomy in working with developers that might be
interested in this land. The HRA having the option
eliminates one step of negotiations when a developer in-
dicates interest.
The City Council granted direct option to Poehler. This
alternative would be workable for the purpose of Mr.
Poehler's application packet but would interfer with the
tax increment financing proposal since the land sale
really should occur from the NRA to the developer not
from the City Council to the developer. Thus, for the
City to grant the option directly to the developer would
later involve the necessity of breaking the option and
then arranging the purchase by the HRA who would then
need to arrange the purchase by the developer.
.i. ueny the request for an option and Cur the prupunal.
decision such as thin probably should be founded on the
notion that there in a higher or better use for the land
and that the proposed development is not considered do-
sirable at this time.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONi I recommend that the option be granted to the
HRA. I should note that they are requesting the option for only
a $1.00 oi.nco their working capital is extremely limited and ad-
ditional funds were not budgeted for the year of 1983 for them.
I also encouraged the option to be granted for the year so that
regardless of the outcome of the Pochler project, the MRA still
has some controllingintorost and can work directly with any po-
tential developer.
REFERENCES: A copy of tho minutes of the NRA meetings, a copy of
the minutes of the Planning Commission discussion, a copy of the
financial data concerning the property, a copy of the standard
Federal option agreement that the HRA will enter into with the
developer.
- 6 -
MINUTES
HOUSING 6 REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
January 5, 1963 - 7:00 P.M.
Members Present: Jack Reeve, Don Cochran, Bud Schrupp and Vic
Vokaty.
Members Absent: Phil White.
The meeting was called to order by consensus. A motion by Reeve,
seconded by Schrupp and carried unanimously appointing Cochran as
acting chairman in the absence of Dr. White. A motion by Schrupp,
seconded by Vokaty and carried unanimously to approve the minutes
of November 29, 1982 meeting as read.
Cochran raised the question concerning items N3 and 04 on the agenda
and whether or not they should be handled as separate issues or as
a single combined issue. Eidem explained that item 04, Poehler's
request for an option really seemed to come after a discussion of
whether or not an option on Lots 13, 14 and 15 of Block 51 was of
interest to the HRA. Cochran raised a question as to whether or
not a discussion of this option would have come up if there were
no proposal by a developer also on the agenda. Eidem indicated
that in his estimation it would not be a critical issue, although
it might fall into the category of general discussion. It was
the consensus of the HRA that discussion on whether or not to
pursue an option on the land be postponed until after the dis-
cussion with Mr. Poehler on the grounds that if the development
proposal did not moot with the HRA'a approval, the item relating
to the option became irrelevant. Mr. Joe Poehler introduced
himself and provided soma background into his development pro-
posal. He indicated that he wan interested in developing a
Farmers Herne Administration 515 Housing Project for moderate
income elderly persona. Ho stated that he was very interacted
in lots 13, 14 and 15 in Block 51. lie said that he had conducted
an extensive survey to gauge interest in ouch a project and of
109 respondents, 56 stated that they would definitely move into a
facility of this sort were it constructed. Poehler also provided
background concerning his previous project in Waterville and his
proposals in Goodhuo. Minnesota, and a development project he is
working on in Colorado. Poehler also provided coma personal back-
ground so that the HRA might have a bettor fool for the character
of the development. Poehler noted t,hat he was formally requesting
an option agreement on the land, since that would be required for
him to submit hie proapplication to Farmers Home Administration and
further, he wan also requesting that the NRA utilize tax increment
for the acquisition of the above referenced parcels, since the
UIN
1
HRA Minutes - 1/5/83
-1
market price for the land seemed unusually high for the nature of J
this project. He explained that the return on the investment in
land would be severely limited were he required to pay the full
asking price whereas a slightly reduced cost through tax increment
financing would make the project financially feasible. The HRA
conceded that they could not really grant the option since
action had not been taken earlier and the land was not yet in the
HRA's name. A motion by Reeve, seconded by Schrupp that agenda
item #3 be deferred to January 19, 1983, and that City Staff pre-
pare the following data for consideration at that time.
1. A complete range of option alternatives on the above men-
tioned parcel.
2. A preliminary type tax increment finance budget which would
illustrate possible land sales alternatives.
This was carried unanimously.
A motion made by Schrupp, seconded by Vokaty and carried unani-
mously to postpone action on agenda N4 until January 19, 1983,
so that a preliminary presentation of the project can be made
by the HRA members to the Monticello Planning Commission. By
concensus, a special meeting of the HRA was not for 8:00 P.M.,
wednosday, January 19, 1963. A motion by Keeve, seconded by
Schrupp and carried unanimously to move items #5 and 6 to the J
regular February meeting of the IIRA. The data for which will
he act by consensus at the January 19th meeting.
Acting Chairman Cochran adjourned the meeting.
L
Thomas Eidem
City Administrator
- 2 -
MIN
J
MINUTES
HOUSING 6 REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
January 19, 1983 - 8:00 P.M.
Members Present: Jack Reeve, Don Cochran, Bud Schrupp, Vic Vokaty,
Phil White and Tom Eidem.
Members Absent: None.
Acting Chairman Cochran called the meeting to order. There was a
motion by white to appoint Cochran the Chairman of the HRA for 1983.
A point of information was raised concerning the potential conflict
that is being investigated as to whether or not Cochran can serve
on both the Planning Commission and the HRA. White withdrew the
motion, motion by Reeve, seconded by Schrupp and carried unani-
mously appointing Phil White as Chairman of the HRA for the year
of 1983. Administrator Eidem reviewed the reason for the special
meeting. Cochran and Reeve, who had taken the Poehler housing
proposal to the Planning Commission reported that there were no
objections voiced by that Commission. The Planning Commission
also noted that if rezoning will be required, they aro likely to
leek favorably ron it. -idc:. di cu. cd :ar..,. .,,r
acquiring and/or granting options on Lots 13, 14 and 15, Block 51,
to promote this development. A motion by Cochran, seconded by
Reeve and carried unanimously to offer the City Council $1.00 and
other good and valuable consideration in exchange for a contingency
option on Lots 13, 14 and lot 15, less the south 15 feet of Block 51,
City of Monticello, said option to have a tern of one year. Eidem
noted that he will take this offer to the City Council on January 24th.
Considerable discussion again followed regarding Mr. Poehlar's request
not only for an option, but that his project be considered for tax
increment financing. When Mr. Poehlor came before the HRA on Jan-
uary 5th, he noted that his request for an option also included the
request for tax increment financing since according to his figures
at that time, he would need both to make it financially operative.
Eidem pointed out that any motion now by the HRA to grant Mr.
Poahlor an option on the land would at least imply that Mr. Poohlor
has boon given tentative approval for a tax increment financing
package. Eidem did noto that when the data becomes more finalized,
it still will be absolutely critical that all the numbers make the
plan a workable plan and that the HRA is not bound by going ahead
with this if it becomes economically unfeasible. A motion by Schrupp,
second by Vokaty and carriod unanimously to offer to Joe Poahlor, a
developer, a contingent option on Lots 13, 14 and 15, less the south
15 foot of Block 51, City of Monticello, for the amount of $200, said
option for the oxpreas purpose of preparing and aulmitting a loan
W -A
HRA Minutes - 1/19/83
application to Farmers Home Administration for the purpose of construc-
ting low/moderate income elderly housing, and further, said option shall
expire at 5:00 P.M. on May 9, 1983. A motion by Reeve, seconded by
Cochran and carried to set the next HRA meeting for February 9th, 1983
at 6:30 P.M. in the City Hall. There being no other business, White
adjourned the meeting for the HRA.
Thomas A. Eidem
City Administrator
FINANCIAL DATA FOR LATS 13, 14 6 IAT 15,
LESS THE SOUTH 15', BLACK 51
Mortgage 35,000.00
Option Cost 6,854.00
Nov. 1982 to May 1983 2,430.00
Sub total/land cost 44,284.00
Contracted Demolition 1,400.00
Sewer/Water Disconnects 1,300.00
City Prep/Backfill, Hauling, Etc. 1,900.00
48,884.00
Legal, Administrative, Contingency
(3%) 1,466.00
Total Coot (Land)
N"r
50,350.00
I
c c�
Position s
Form FmHA 440.34
(Rev. 9.11.78)
( UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
\ FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION
OPTION TO PURCHASE REAL PROPERTY
1. in consideration of the a= of t in hand paid and other valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the undersigned (hereinafter called the "Seller"), who
covenants to be the owner thereof, hereby, for the Seller and the Seller's heirs, executors, administrator&, successor,
and assigns, offers and agrees to sell and convey to
Joseph G. and Roslyn Poehler Rt. 2, Box 92, Waterville, MN 56096
(Name and Acidness)
(hereinafter called the "Buyer'), and hereby grants to the said Buyer the exclusive and irrevocable option and right to
purchase, under the conditions hereinafter provided, the following -described property, located in Wright
County, State of Minnesota
(Insert here full and complete legal description, including volume and page where recorded, of the property including any
water rights and water stock being purchased.)
--` M1 PmHA440•34 (R., 9.11.78)
The title to said property u to be conveyed 'free and clear of all encumbrances except for the following reservations,
exceptions and leases, and no other:
(Insert here s full statement of all reservations, exceptions and leases, including in the case of leases, the date of the
termination of the leave, the conect creme(.) and address(a) of the lessee(s) and, if recorded, the place of recordation)
2. This option is given to enable the Buyer to obtain a loan insured or made by the United States of America, acting
through the Farmers Home Administration, United States Department of AFrcculture, (heseimfter called the "Govrrnment"),
for the purchase of said property. It is agreed that the Buyer's efforts to obtain a loan constitute a pan of the consideration
for this option and any downpayment will be refunded if a loan cannot be processed by FmHA.
3. The total purchase price for said property is f . :said amount
C] includes Q excludes the f , mentioned in paragraph 1.
4. The Seller agrees to pay all exptnses of title clearance including, if required, abstract or certificate of title or policy I
of title insurance, continued down to the date of acceptance of this option and thereafter continued down to and including
date of recordation of the deed from the Seller to the Buyer, costa of survey, if required, and attorney's fees: and the '
Seller agrees that, except as herein provided, all taxes, liens, encumbrances or other interests In third persons will be satisfied
discharged, or paid by the Seller including stamp taxes and other expenses incident to the preparation and execution of the
tired and other evidences of title. Title evidences will be obtained from persons and be in such farm as the Government shall
.pp.o.c.
(Strike inapplicable language above or insert herein my different agreement regarding the paying of title cketrance elaorger)
'. , - SC- .I. re fm the Buyer, from the records of the County A cultural St '
cbmminee, social surveil of the droneyu yt w ..• t on re atinq to allotments and production
I'....I ally curer mtnrmmon needed In connection with the comidenu
tion of the proposed pdrcsac .af :. , r
o. The Sella further agrees to convey said property to the Buyer by general warranty deed (except where thelaw provide.
otherwise for conveyances by truaten, officers of courts, etc.) in the form, manna and at the time requbed by the Govern•
anent, conveying to the Buyer a valid, unencumbered, indefeasible feesimple title to said property meeting all requirements
of the Govenunentt that the purchase price shall be paid at the time of recording such deed: and that aid lands, including
improvemenn, shall be delivered in the same condition as they now are, customary use and wear excepted.
7. Tran, rata assessments and uthn general and special assessments of whAt.mver nattae for the year In which the
closing of the :ransaction takes place shell be prorated a of the date of the closing of the transaction, it being expressly
agreed that for the purpose of such proration the tax year shell be deemed to be the calendar year. If the closing of the
transaction shall occur before the tam rate u fixed, the apportionment of teats &hall be on the bads of the tat rate (or the
near preceding year applied to the latest assessed valuation.
(Iruerr here dry dlfferenr tai agreement)
g, Thi. option may be eaaur.ad I—',, I ,rime while .he offer hr, i 11 remain In force, by mailing, tela•
I:w_ ,,. J.h •..:,._ In rr.•m, ... - • .. �,Y/
g. This option may be exercised rite Buyer, at any time while the offer hereitOIf remain In force, by mailing, tele•
graphing or delivering in persona written notice of acceptance of the offer herein to
at • in the city of r
( County ar State of i
The offer herein shall remain irrevocable for a period of months from the date hereof and shall remain
in force thereafter until one (1) year from the date hereof unless earlier terminated by the Seller. The Seller may terminate
this offer at any time after the months' irrevocable period provided herein by giving to the buyer ten
(10) claws' written notice of intention to terminate at the address of the Buver. Acceptance of this option by the Buyer
within ten (10) days after such notice is received by the Buyer shall constitute a valid acceptance of the option.
9. Loss or damage to she property by rue or from an act of God shall be at the risk of the Seller until the deed to the
Buver has been recorded, and in the event that such lou or damage occurs, the Buver maw, without liability, refuse to
accept conveyance of title, or may elect to accept conveyance of title, in which can there shall be an equitable adjustment
of the purchase price.
10. The Seller agrees that, irrespective of any other provision in this option, the Buyer, or the Buyer's mignees, may,
if the option is accepted, without any liability therefore refuse to accept conveyance of the property described herein if the
for esaid loan cannot be made or insured because of defects in the title to other land now owned by, at being purchased by,
the buyer.
r ;..:nF...yy. Seller's expense. to the Buyer a certificate from a fella
ing described buildrng(s) covered bw t, LumuUumin (21 either is now ree of unrepaired
,n iia. uttered unrepaired termite mage which is specifically described in the ceruncasa.
r furnish, at the Seller's e: ettn, to the guy" evidence from the Health De
p 1
competent source that t e wane aupuaai ./.. r_ wel' ..a„g pruperry, and the water supply for domettic
me mcen State Health fhn•rrm•^• t t ..,.....wen encs moa dminbtntioa County Office
approved.
IJ. The Seller hereby gives the Govensment or its A enu consent to enter on said property, at reaaoruble times for the put.
POof inspecting or appraising it, in connection with the making of • loan to purchase the property.
la. Insert here conditions peculiar to this partieuler transaction.
I(Sellers Telephone Number)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Seller and the Buyer have set their hands and seals this say of
19_.
WITNESSES:
(Srlfn)
(Sefb.)
(buyer)
(Breyer)
•(Indirare rwarital •tarns of Seller at "assaniad,”"41x1! cared," "..md ried,"after s(rBara re) -�
(Fw km if SeUrr is a corporation)
i
IN wrrNESS WHEREOF, the Wer has auaed its corporsto Dame to be hereuato wbecribsd by its
Resident, and iter duly atteitsd corporate sea! to be hereunto affind by Its
Secretary, at . State of
on the day of
(COMRAYE SEAL)
(Name of Corporation)
A TEES T: By 1
secretary. Nerldent.
! AC KN OW LE UG ME NT
1
ou.5. (AVEMWNT PRINTIP4 OFFIcr. 1970.665.052/1
`3
i
l
I
iI
1
J � Q
Council Agenda - 1/24/83
`,. 9. Consideration of a Mutual Aid Fire Aqreement with the City of
Clearwater. (T.E.)
In December, the Clerk of the City of Clearwater sent to me a
letter requesting to come before the Council at the first
meeting in January as well as a copy of a standard mutal aid
fire agreement. I wrote back to the clerk and informed him
that I would pass the agreement onto the fire department so
that they could meet and make a determination and based on
their response, the Council would then review the request.
The fire department met on January 10th, the same night as the
City Council and discussed entering this mutal aid fire agree-
ment with Clearwater. Dave Kranz of the department informed
me that the membership was favorable to entering such an agree-
ment. I did note to Dave Kranz that the copy of the standard
agreement had some wording that I was uncomfortable with in
that it seemed to infer that an agreement made with Clearwater
was an agreement made with all other cities that Clearwater
had a fire aid agreement with, and that I did not think that we
wanted to enter mutual aid agreements with all of those other
communities. Dave said that the fire department agreed after
reviewing it that if an agreement is entered, the language
should be altered enough to reflect that the agreement is solely
with the City of Clearwater and not with any of their other
attlllates. 1 nave notified the clerk Of cicarwater and he
intends to appear at the Council meeting. Relative to the
actual signed agreement, Pringle has been sick in bad for over
a week, so I have not had the opportunity to moot with him and
work on revisions of the language. I think, however, that the
agreement can be approved contingent upon appropriate wording
changes.
REFERF.NCF.9: A copy of the letter from the Clark of Clearwater
and a copy of the original mutual aid fire agreement which will
need to be amended.
- 7 -
Otp of C(eartuater
Cka"A tr. Oitm oda 84320
December lb, 1982
Mayor/City Council
City of Monticello
Monticello, MN 55362
The City of Clearwater desiree to enter into a mutual aid egreement with the City of
Monticello for the purpose of fire protection.
( The Council has requested that Z write to see if this matter could be put on your -
agenda for January.
If you have any questions, please ca11 me at 558-2428, 8:00 a.m. -:12:00 noon.
Sincerely,
DonaE. Sankey
ld
Clerk
c
FIRE DEP,ARTif.ENT MUTUAL ,rt�`ENE3PF
71113 AGREDOM, made and entered into on the date hereafter stated by;and between
the municipal corporations executing this agreement.
1•lHEMAS, the said municipalities desire to make av4ilable4 to each other and each
of said municipalities has legal authority to send its fire -fighting equipment and
personnel into other communities, and, whereas, it is anticipated that similar agree-
ments will be executed by other nearby cities,
i;{3N THEREFORE IT IS IXTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOW:, t
That in consideration of the mutual covenants, agreements, and undertakings
hereinafter sat forth, each of the parties hereto agrees to furnish fire fighting
assistance to any Of the others, who have 6xeeuted similar agreements, when called
upon by the fire chief, or fire desartment officer in charge, of any of the other
parties hereto, subject to the following conditions:
1. That road and weather conditions must be such that the fire run can be made
with reasonable safety to men and equipment, and the decision of the fire chief, or
other fire department officer in charge, shall be final in such matters.
2. That in the event that all of the fire apparatus; and all or most of the
members of the fire department of any cosmunity so called upon for fire assistance
by one of the other parties hereto, are in use in said community at, the time the
call cosec in from the other party, or by the discernment of the fire chief or other
fire department officer in charge may be needed in said community, the said community
shall be held free and relieved from all liability to'make said run or to respond to
said call.
3. That in the event any apparatus and members of the fire department of any
community engaged in fire fighting for the benefit of the party calling for assistance
or in response to a call from said party, ahall'be needed to fight fire or for any
other purpose in its own community, that apparatus and the members of said fire
deplrtr-nt, mny and rhntl be recalled to its own community before completing the fire
£ir,hting for the other party, and said assisting party shall be held free from any
liability to continue fighting said fire.
4. If one or more fires occur within the limits of any of the above municipalities,
or within the limits of any territory in which any said municipalities has contracted
to furnish fifq-fighting equipment and personnel, and the fire -fighting equipment and/or
personnel of any of the municipalities executing this contract is, in the judgement
of the chief of its fire department, or in his absence, his assistant or deputy in
charge of its fire department, insufficient to control or extinquish the fire or fires,
an "emari;eney" shall exist for the purpose of this agreement.
5. If an emergency arisea, any of the persons who are entitled by paragraph 1 above
to determine an emergency -.may call upon the fire department of one or more of the
municipalities above named, which are adjacent, for assistance. If all the fire-
fir,hting equipment and personnel of any c!' said municipalities is engaged in fire
fif,�htin% the chief or other commending officer of the fire department of any other
ouch municipality whose fire -fighting equipment is not engaged in fire fighting shall
tend czlut;meht and personnel to the empty fire station to be available for call if
re:luired for any fire. It is the intention of the parties by this agreement to
cooperate in the nvenP any emer" ncy by making available necessary fire -fighting
equipment ani persons l from the nearest fire stations and during such an emoriency
to rt irranF�a fire -fighting equipment of the parties so as to make the remaining
equipment and personnel available for use in the event other fires shall occur
anyuhore throuj,hout the territory of these municipalities.
6. Upon receipt of a call for assistance as set forth in paragraph 5, the fire
department of any of the parties hereto shall promptly dispatch at least one fire
trunk with the usual number of personnel to assist in fighting the fire which has
eaurrd the emergency or to render stand-by service as the case may be, provided that
no fire department of any of the said parties shall be obligated to sand its fire
equipment and/or personnel beyond its boundaries it to do so would leave such
municipality without any fire equipment or personnel available within its limits
for cervica at any fire which might subsequently arise therein. In txtreae emargeneias,
however, every effort will be made to redistribu ere -fighting equipment and personnel
9
Fire Department Mutual Aid Agreement
Page 2 i
t i
so as to make it available for any additional fires which might arise during the
z
emergency.
7. The fire -fighting equipment and personnel of any fire department assisting
the fire department of any, other municipality in an emergency will immediately, upon
arrival at the scene of the emergency, be under the command of the officer in charge
of the municipality within whose boundaries the emergency is situated.
8. No charre will be made by any party for assistance rendered to another party
under this agreement.
9. Each of the parties will maintain insurance policies covering:
a. Worker's Compensation Insurance on all personnel in the amounts required
by state low.
b. Liability Insurance of a reasonable amount covering personnel injuries and
property damage .
10. No party to this agreement, nor any officer or employee of any party, shall
be liable to any other party or to any person on account of failure of any party of
this agreement to furnish its fire -fighting equipment and/or personnel in response to
a call for assistance from any other municipality.
11. While each party in answering a call from some other party hereto shall
attempt to furnish a reasonable number of firemen on each piece of equipment answering
such call, the discretion of the fire chief or other fire department officer in charge
of the equipment and department of said party shall be final as to the number of
firemen that can be spared.
12. That in the event of fire calls from two or more communities or parties hereto,
the first call shall have priority and the second call shall be answered as soon m 0
possibla, it being understood botween all parties hereto that property within the
limits of each community shall have first tall -on the services of its own fire department.
13. No liability shall be incurred by a party who shall have summoned assistance
under thin agreement for damage to, or destruction of, fire -fighting equipment of a
party randertnp, such assistance unless ouch damage or destruction shall be caused by
ne.�liront or malicious conduct of any officer or employee of the party which has
rtumnoned such annistance.
lit. That the governing body of each party hereto will appoint three representatives
from among its officers and fire -fighting personnel to serve as members of an
annociation forced for the purpose of furthering the purposes of this agreement and
inrreaoinr the efficiency of the fire -fighting service® of these municipalities by
exchange of information, standardization of equipment, education of personnel,
perfection of methods of fire alarms throughout the territory of these municipalities,
and ruch other matters as win serve to mutually assist these municipalities in the
prevention and extinguishment of fires.
15. Any party hereto Pay withdraw from this agreement by thirty days notice in
writing to the others.
16. A copy of this agreement shall be posted at the fire department headquarters
of each party horeto. Subject to all of the above conditions, each of the portico
1wreto a,reea to make every reasonable effort to attend fires in any of the other
rorrrunitica mentiorrd heroin when such assistance to requested as stated above.
Fire Department Mutual Aid Agreement ;
/ Page 3 d
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the said municipalities have caused this agreement to be
signed in their respective corporate names by their respectiveduly authorized '
officers of authority of their respective governing bodies.•
i .Y •
CITY OF CIEARWATER CITY OF N,ONTICELID
By By
Mayor Mayor
By By
City Clerk City Clerk
Dated Dated
,
J
Council Agenda - 1/24/83
10. Consideration of an Application for a Conditional Use Request -
Mike DeBoer.
Mr. Michael DeBoer, who currently lives in St. Michael, Minn-
esota, requested a conditional use permit to be allowed to
operate a minor repair body shop on a portion of Lot 10, Block 16,
Townsite of Monticello. The proposed site is directly north of
Noon Motors fronting along Hwy 25 and the property is currently
owned by Clifford Olson of Minneapolis. Mr. DeBoer plans on tem-
porarily renting the garage from Mr. Olson for the purpose of
operating a body shop. Although Mr. DeBoer feels the location
would be ideal for his repair business, the likelihood of him
purchasing the entire property including the existing house from
Mr. Olson does not, at the current time, appear feasible.
The City's current zoning ordinance allows for a minor repair
auto facility as a conditional use within a B-4 zone. As part
of the conditional use requirements, Mr. DeBoer requested a
variance from the minimum lot size requirements of 22,500
square feet as the proposed site only contains 10,890 square
feet. In addition, Mr. De Boar also requested a variance from
curb, gutter and hard surfacing of the parking lot requirements
on a temporary basin to see if his business can be established
before a large amount of capital is expended on these improve-
ments .
An additional variance would also have to be granted to allow
two principal uses of this parcel of land as the legal descrip-
tion is now for one parcel and there is currently a hone on the
property that is being rented. Mr. DaBoor'n plana include sumo
internal remodeling of the garage structure to accommodate a
body shop and also come exterior work to make the building pro-
sentable including a major clean up of the lot.
A public hearing on thio conditionaluso permit request wan held
t.y the Planning Commission on January 11, 1983. No comments
wore heard or presented by any of the abutting property owners
but coon concerns were expressed by members of tie Planning
Comoisaion regarding outside storage of cars or parts and the
possible odors that could result from painting, etc. in thio
location. In addition, Planning Commission Member Bondhua
felt that thin area fronting along Iiwy, 25 would be more suit-
able for a commercial business and he felt a body shop in thio
location was not the twat suitable use of the property. As a
result, the Planning Commission on a three to two veto, rec-
ommondod that the conditional use permit be denied.
- 8 -
Council Agenda - 1/24/83
Enclosed with this agenda supplement, you will find a brief ex-
planation of what Mr. De Boer intends to do to the property if
a conditional use permit is granted. As you will note, Mr. De -
Boer intends to take certain steps to control the emissions that
could result from a body shop and also provide some upgrading of
the property including a privacy fence to screen any outside
storage from both residential and Hwy 25 view.
As some of you may recall, a few years ago, a conditional use
permit was granted on a temporary basis of one year for this
property to be used as a small engine and bicycle repair facility.
At that time, the hard surfacing of the parking lot was granted
a one year variance to see whether the business would be es-
tablished but as it turned out, the individual requesting the
permit decided not to open the business.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of approving or denying the
conditional use request for the minor repair body shop and a
variance from the hard surfacing requirements. The length of
the variance on the black topping should be determined along
with the amount of screening that should be provided if approved.
REFERENCES: Minutes of the Planning Crmmission public hearing
C along with information provided by Mr. De Boor including references
and eketchoo indicating how the site would look.
C
MIC
January 18; 1983
To wham .ii may toner
I am a 1972 graduate of Dunwoody Institute where I learned
the Auto' Body, Trade. I worked five years at Suburban
Chevro I ei, before 'going into business, on ey own in 1977. I
sold' my business,in St., Michael' In Septcmbcr 4982 for several,
reasons none of which would have been, or are now, degrading
to'myself`or the business.
I would like a conditional use permit to renovate and operate
an Auto Body Business on the property in question. My inten-
tions would be:
i. to establish and operate a respectable and professional
business,
2., to renovate the buildings in question --not only to make
themsuitable for use, but also to enhance the appear-
ance so that the, sight is an asset to the community-
3.
ommunity—
0 3. -install' the equipment necessary to see to it that the° e o
business is not,a,dotriment°to the neighborhood.
Oneof, the,concerns;of the the Planning and Zoning Committee °
was thai,of'pairh,fumes,exhausted into the neighborhood., I
will -betaking steps to make certain that the,emisiens of the
,shop would bd,very minimal and undetected by the public. The, o
;installation of ,an electonie air purifier, coupled with an
b exhaust systemi that exhausts straight up, would insure no
hazard of any kind to the public. Also, steps would be taken ° a
to cut the;risk• of fire including fire extinguishers and the
lining of the; interior roof with metal to forma fire barrier.
Attached are letters from the Mayor and City C1erk of St. Mi'chael', °
both of wtiom are not personal friends. Please contact any, city
} official of Si. Michael for my needed reference. °
Respectfully submitted,
A4RtfiPQ4 n -
Michael DaBoer
(2D
I(-
1/0 Z&W
CA,nj
Atz
4c:
17,
January 3j, 1993
a
C,_.tv o!' St. MichaeI
Or 'ice of the Cl.crk °
i4.-hael,. MinnesoLA `>3'.'v
T..) 'rlltum" It May cow -01-11
Mr. Miehool U• Iffier i:: well knots in 0iis area and was
In the: body shop business here. I havo •porsonally kno:•t.
him and havo clone business :With him over the na ::: five
years.
X3:1336 hl. crn
f -i l'y f 1 ark °
:lisftl� •
°
c
as
AN
OUrOF 5t6tjr
srj�\V
jj + C7
1�114)2y 25--
t
fr
To F:, f3
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICEmo PLANNING COMMISSION
January 11, 1983 - 7:30 P.M.
Members Present: John Bondhus, Jim Ridgeway, Joyce Dowling,
Ed Schaffer, Richard Carlson.
Members Absent: None.
1. Approval of the Minutes of the Meetinq Held on December 13,
1982.
A motion was made by Schaffer, seconded by Dowling and unani-
mously carried to approve the minutes of the regular meeting
held December 13, 1982.
2. Public Hearing - Conditional Use Permit Request - Mike De Boer.
Mr. Michael De Boor, who currently lives in St. Michael, Minn-
esota, requested a conditional use permit to be allowed to
operate a minor repair body shop on a portion of Lot 10,
Block 16, Townsite of Monticello. The proposed site is di-
rectly north of Moon Motors fronting along Nw 25 And the
property is currently owned by Clifford Olson of Minneapolis.
Mr. DaBoer plans on temporarily renting the garage from Mr.
Olson for the purpose of operating a body shop. Although
Mr. DoSoer feels the location would be ideal for his repair
business, the likelihood of him purchasing the entire
property including the existing house from Mr. Olson done
not, at the current time, appear feasible.
The City's current.zoning ordinance allows for a minor re-
pair auto facility as a conditional use within a B -C cone.
As part of the conditional use requirements, Mr. DeBoar
requested a variance from the minimum lot size requirements
of 22,500 square feet as the proposed site only contains
10,890 square feet. In addition, Mr. De Boor also requested
a variance from curbgutter and hard surfacing of the park-
ing lot requirements on a temporary basis to sae if his
business can be established before a large amount of capi-
tal is expanded on these improvements. Kc. DoBoer'e plans
ineluda oohs internal remodeling of the garage structure
tc accommodate a body shop and, also acme exterior work to
make the building presentable including a major clean up
of the lot.
Planning Commission Minutes - 1/11/83
Concerns were expressed by some of the Planning Commission members
as to whether any outside storage of cars or parts would occur and
Mr. De Boer noted that he would construct a small fence or screen
between the south end of the building towards Moon Motor's build-
ing for the purpose of storing a dumpster and possibly one car in
that area that would be screened from Hwy 25.
Questions were raised by Commission Member Bondhue concerning
whether spray painting in the shop would cause some pollution
of the air and also Mr. Bondhus felt that this area fronting
along Hwy 25 in a prime, commercial area and he felt a body shop
in this location was not the beat, suitable use of the property.
An additional variance would also have to be granted to allow
two principal uses of this parcel of land as the legal descrip-
tion is now for one parcel and there is currently a home on the
property that is being rented.
Although Mr. Do Boer was requesting the conditional use permit
for one year to see whether the business could be established
prior to any major improvements such as blacktopping, a motion
was made 6y nuudhus, secondrJ by Sclaffer a Cc a0msliny LhaL Lhw
conditional use permit be denied as they felt this vas not the
bout area to locate a body shop. voting in favor of the motion
were nondlws, Schaffer and Ridgeway. opposed: Dowling and
Carlson.
2. Review of an Elderly Housing Project Proposal by the IiRA.
HRA Committee Members, Don Cochran and Jack Reove, were present
at the Planning Comnission meeting to review with the Planning
Commission a recent proposal their committee had received in
regard to the construction of elderly housing in Monticello.
Recently, Mr. Joe Poehler of Waterville, Minnesota, has met
with the HRA Committee to discuss his interact in developing
a 23 unit, moderate incase, elderly housing project on throe
lots in Block 51. This property is currently owned by the
Monticello Development Corporation but the City of Monticello
has an option agreement to purchase this property. It was
noted by the HRA Committee that Mr. Poehlor has requested an
option from the IIRA to purchase this property and is in the
process of completing his appli6htion to Farmers Home Adminis-
tration for funding.
C/O
Planning Commission Minutes - 1/11/03
The primary reason the committee was presenting this proposal at
the present time to the Planning Commission was to gather some
in put from the Planning Commission in regard to the location of
this proposed housing project and how it relates to the City's
current comprehensive plan in regard to toning, etc. The prop-
erty is currently zoned B-4, regional business and if a housing
project, as proposed, would be developed, the Planning Commission
would have to consider rezoning the property to either R -B (resi-
dential business) or R-7 (multiple family residential). After a
brief review of the project, it was the general consensus of the
Planning Commission that the proposed site in Block 51 would
appear to be ideal for the location of an elderly housing pro-
ject in that the committee felt the property which fronts along
River Street would not necessarily be prime, commercial prop-
erty. It was noted by the committee members that if this project
does proceed, it would be their recommendation that the property
be considered for rezoning to allow for this type of develop-
ment.
A motion was made by Dowling, seconded by Schaffer to adjourn.
Rick wolfsteller}
Assistant Administrator
Council Agenda - 1/24/83
11. Ratification of the Membership of the Senior Citizen Council and
Historical Society. (T. E.)
Ordinarily ratification of these memberships are done at the same
time as the annual appointments. This came as a news to me and
as a result, the membership was not on the list at the first meet-
ing. I have since assembled the names of the people who have been
elected by their membership and if following past practice in which the
Council gives ratification, this meeting would be the time to do it.
I have enclosed as references, both a list of the membership and a
copy of the new by-laws of the Senior Citizen Council. The by-laws
should probably also be addressed in either the same or a separate
motion..
REFERENCES: A copy of the membership list for the Senior Citizens
Council and the Historical Society and also a copy of the new by-
laws of the Senior Citizen Council.
- 10 -
650 Senior Citizens
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Leo Nelson
Caroline Ellison
Marie Petersen
Marie Bruning
Lloyd Iund
Doug Pitt
Harry Schaffer
Harry Stokes
Shelly Johnson
Ex -Officio - Karen Hanson
HISTORICAL SOCIETY COMMITTEE
Marion Jameson
Sue Erickson
Hugh McKinnon
Ruth McKinnon
Milo Moon
Connie Decker
Elizabeth LaBroe
rathryn Meyer
Margueritte Perrault
Fern Rose Sranoon
M
CONSTITUTIO11 & BY-LAWS OF
MONTICELLO SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER
Article I
Name
The name of this organization shall be the Monticello Senior Citizens Center.
Article II
Purpose
The purpose of the Center shall be:
1. To aid and develop activities of Senior Citizens groups throughout
Monticello area and Wright County, providing a link of communications
between local groups and county. state and national agencies.
2. Make available to the local committees information for the benefit of
the Senior Citizens in community groups.
Prc!., Ae a ftr%—,-n for locel Seni^r ritiEen lardere to explore end A!!!re,1.!
issues, methods and practical applications in the field of aging.
4. To provide a central source of information in Wright County for
publicity and public information in matters pertaining to the aging.
5. To inform appropriate existing voluntary and governmental agencies of
needs for programs, facilities and resources within their area of
authority and responsibility and to cooperate with the agencies in
fulfilling such needs.
Article III
Membership
There will be no membership. Anyone 60 years of age or older or incepitated
at an earlier age or the spouse of game is welcome.
Article IV
Board of Directors
1. Monticello Senior Citizens Center will have an advisory group known as
Board of Directors.
2. Board of Directors will hav•. 9 members who shall he nominated by
existing Board of Direetp a and•ppr by the city council.
3. Terme of office for Board of Directors shell be as long as members
■re physically and mentally capable, or request to be removed,
or are asked to resign following a 213 vote of members of said Board.
4. Board will hold bi-monthly meetings on the 2nd Monday. Special
meetings will be held me doomed necessary.
5• Officers for Board of Directors will include President, Vice -President,
Secretary and Treasurer. Officers for Board of Directors are elected
by Board members for and indefinite period.
Duties of Officers:
A.) President will preside at all regular and special meetings.
B.) Vice -President shall perform all duties when the President is
absent or unable to act.
C.) The secretary shall keep an up-to-date account of all minutes
of all meetings. A printed agenda shall be prepared by the
_tcretery end center Air-nt•nr onA 01-11 be n"11--v-il-bit f.n
ell board members 3 days prior to schelduled meeting.
D.) Treasurer shall keep an up-to-date account of all receipts and
expenditures. Treasurer will pay out bills as authorized by.
center director. Any payment in excess of $4.00. shall only
be paid ae authorized by the Board of'Directors. A financial
report of all business transpired since the.last meeting of the
Board, shall be made available to all Board members 3 days
prior to the scheduled nesting.
6. The paid full-time Director and the President of the Centers Group
officers will serve as ex-officso members of the Board. Director
will be responsible to the Board and city council.
T. If any board member misses three 3 consecutive regular scheduled
meetings without a legitimate excuse, they will automatically be
replaced by remaining board members.
8. All Board members will be notified prior to every regular
t• and special meetings, either verbally or by mail.
9. All meetings of the Board are open to the public and notice
of all meetings will be posted 3 days in advance. Anyone
bringing business before the Board will be given an opportunity
to speak 10 minutes prior to opening of the regular meeting.
10. All treasurers reports are to be posted in the center and all
are to be kept on file in the Directors office along with all
grants and Center information.
Article V
Center Group Officers
1. In addition to the Board of Directors the center will have elected
officers, who will hold monthly meetings the second Tuesday of
each month at the center.
{' 2. The officers will consist of President, Vice -President and Secretary.
3. President will appoint a nominating, committee during the regular
September meeting, who will submit candidates to the center
participates at the regular October meeting to be voted upon.
Officers take office at November meeting. Nominations may be
mode from the floor at this meeting,,. All elected members shall
be elected by secret ballot.
G. Duties of Officers:
A.) President will preside over monthly meetings or any special
meetings.
B.) Vice -President will perform all duties when the President
is absent or unable to act.
l C.) Secretary will keep an up-to-date account of all minutes of
l all meetings. (Treasurer from Board of Directors will handle
all center money.)
5. President will serve one term. Vice -President is promoted to
President and new Vice -President elected every year. Secretary J
shall also serve one year term.
6. The Centers Group Officers and those in attendance at these
meetings shell make no binding decisions pretaining to the
center, but rather recommendations to the Board for their
final decisions
Article VI
1. There shall be no gambling or alcoholic beverages served
at any time within the Center.
Article VII
Amendments
1. These By -Laws may be amended by a 2/3 vote of the Board of
Directors present at a regular meeting.
2. By -Laws shall be reviewed and amended if necessary once each
year at the January meeting.
PjF
0
Council Agenda - 1/20/83
12. Department Head Reports. (T.E.)
Relative to the Senior Citizens Center Director, Karen Hanson, I
have marked this as tentative since Karen has recently gone through
surgery and is now convalescing at home. Rather than ask someone
else to come and in report, I have simply listed this as tentative
and if Karen cannot be here at this meeting, we will ask her to
come when she is feeling batter. There is also a possibility that
she may write up a brief report. The Planning s Zoning, Finance
and Administration have all been lumped together for the purpose
of this report. Rick and I will try to answer your questions and
provide you with any information up dates on what is occurring
in those areas. I will also be prepared to address any questions
you may have about the HRA.
QUARTERLY REPORT
OF THE MONTICELLO FIRE DEPARTMENT
President — Greg Dahlheimer
Vice President — Doug Pitt
Secretary — Lee Trunnell
Treasurer — Willard Anderson
Chief — Willard Farnick Joint Committeemen — Lee Trunnell
Assistant Chief — Gordon Link Paul Klein
1st Captain — David Kranz Training Officer — Gene Jensen
2nd Captain — George Liefert Asst. Training Officer — Ted Farnum
The following is a quarterly report of the Monticello Fire Department from October 1,
1882 to December 31, 1982.
There were 13 personal assists by the Chief end/or Assistant Chief.
There were 15 fires which required 284 man hours. The average attendance at a fire
was 16.
During the past three month period there were 3 training sessions which required
112 man hours. The average attendance at these training sessions was 23.
On October 10th, mutual aid was given to Big Lake Fire Department which required
16 man hours. Also, on October 17th mutual aid was given to Big Lake which required
3 men for 1 hour and 11 men for 4 hours.
On December 15th two men spent one full day with the fire inspector, Robert Inholte,
at the Monti Motel and the Best Western Motel.
Sincerely,
David B. Kranz ^/
Reporter
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE
MONTICELLO FIRE DEPARTMENT
President — Greg Dahlheimer
Vice President — Doug Pitt
Secretary — Lee Trunnell
Treasurer — Willard Anderson
Chief — Willard Farnick Joint Committeemen — Lee Trunnell
Assistant Chief — Gordon Link Paul Klein
1st Captain — David Kranz Training Officer — Gene Jensen
2nd Captain — George Liefert Asst. Training Officer — Ted Fornum
The following is an annual report of the Monticello Fire Department for the year of 1982.
There were 86 personal assists by the Chief and/or Assistant Chief.
There were 52 fires which required 1188 man hours. The average attendance at a fire
was 16.
During the past year, there were 12 training sessions which required 368 man hours
and an average of 21 men attended. A training session at the Pattern Station required
3 men for 7% hours.
SCHOOLS: Mark Wallen and Willard Fornick attended the State Fire School.
Gordv Link. Lee Trunnell, Dave Bitzer, Jay Morrell, Woody Hooland and Jim Maurice
attended a 2 -day Sectional School in Duluth.
Paul Klein, Wayne LaBrco, Dave Kranz, Mark Wallen, and Ted Fornum attended a
2 -day Sectional School in Rochester.
MUTUAL AID: On October 10th, mutual aid was given to Big Lake Fire Department which
required 16 man hours. Also, on October 17th mutual aid was given to Big
Lake which required 3 men for 1 hour and 11 men for 4 hours.
TRAINING: On December 15th two men spent one full day with the fire inspector, Robert
Inholte, at the Monti Motel and the Best Western Motel.
PUBLIC RELATIONS: The department manned a booth at Expo '82. We showed a film and served
coffee at the booth.
The Lions Club gave an appreciation night for all the firemen
The department entered the Walnut Days Parado and the tug of war;
they also entered the Spud Fest Parade and water activities. These
required about 40 hours.
In the past year, 4 tours have been given of the filo barn. These tours
require one or two men for about on hour.
S incerely,
David B. Kranz
Captain & Reporter
Ok
BREAKDOWN OF CALLS FOR 1982
MONTICELLO CITY:
Structure .. ......
.... ...
11
Auto ....................
8
Grass ....................
1
Extrication . .....
...... . ..
0
Other .... ....
..... ... ..
2
TOTAL
22
MONTICELLO TWP.:
Structure .. ...
.. .... . . ....
16
Auto ....................
3
Grass ....................
4
Extrication . ...
.. . .. .. . . . . .
1
Other....................
I
TOTAL
25
SILVER CREEK TWP.:
Structure.. .....
... .....
3
Auto .... ....
. . ..... ... ..
2
Grass ....................
I
Extrication . .....
........ ..
0
Other...................
0
TOTAL
6
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP:
Structure .................
0
Auto.... .. . .............
0
Grass ....................
0
Extrication . .....
... .. ... ..
0
Other ....................
0
TOTAL
0
MUTUAL AID ............. 3
TOTAL NUMBER OF CALLS ... 56
CCouncil Agenda - 1/24/83
13. Consideration of Change Orders 081, 084, 085 and 086. (J.S.)
Change Order 081 - This change order involves the seeding and sod-
ding at the treatment plant. The Council tabled this item at the
January 10th meeting due to the cost of $6,468. I have discussed
this with the Paul A. Laurence Company and Jerry Corrick. The
primary reason for thehigh cost is labor. As you may know, the
contractor is obligated to pay union scale and benefits for equip-
ment operators and laborers which makes the cost of a 3 or
4 man crew very expensive. Any other subcontractor would be
obligated to pay the same rates. Jerry Corrick will have a more
detailed breakdown for the meeting.
Change Order 084 - The grit conveyor in the preliminary treatment
room is at such a steep angle that much of the wet grit slides
down rather than up to the bucket elevator. In order to correct
this situation, it is necessary to construct a hopper with drain
at the lower end of the conveyor. Cost of this modification is
$2,405.00.
Chango Order 085 - Due to possible frosting problems in the
methane gas line entering the aeration building above grade, the
contractor changed the pipe entrance to below grade - In doing so
the 3" fiberglass line entered in the stairway area at a landing.
In order to protect this pipe from damage, it was ne-cossary to
build a circular shield of steel around the pipe. Cost of this
guard is $391.
Change Order 086 - This change order provides OSHA safety required
signs in various areas such as electrical hazards, chlorine gas,
fire extinguiahar, exit oigns, etc. The total coat of those signs
is $1,299.00.
If the above change ordero aro approvad,tho contingency fund
balance would be minuo $88,441.00.
REFERF.NCESs A copy of each of the change orders listed above.
- 12 -
l
1
odw Dal,
cooDEEEtD umaEO Flonc' M 1-u"� �'�/�'' —C.Q: E)1 • . sNlEt_oE
WD BGBMC= QRR,SCMCI FN.MAYERON 8 ASSOCIATES. INC.
DIVIVOM Or KIDDE CONSULTANTS. INC
V 20' EES' NE -EN SVE-SUITE 22- NNEEPDLIS. NN 6YI]TS'tI SII ESBp t•iE.AmY
Fold Mod 1� �afw� 4t I � 3 - Gl,a-.+�c l7rdR/ � 81.
ecdE Said+� Ac"'bois
J
Add;+ P �dd�•,� AreR - - - I 9GV s•f.
1210 qEc �,rds
o125 Rc
47, 00 s: F.
4 InG�NCYJ black cbrt� MWW1) :Ped':,n ?<lfilldc! ,.vt .
�14L�
Cce - - 57 1�d x 4,710 = -Z,-730CJ .11 S, S86
Ge,�,�oh✓ P I - - Pat
&, 4f -4j .
LAWNS 9 PLANTING _ _'.DAlt*_._.-
060L
+Dosred 50 lbs per M S F
!OUTPUT UN11
,AlCREW
25 Oi0
3')0 naui
&SOB
520
CT,
015 I
S00 nail
With .004 hoer mulch Added
175•
130
010
auernatt--,cod 6'deep.700 hao
_ _
5,090
S
025
Soo ,•ul
170
'.315
Muimurrt
040
Sona firm plc rd rough horse tilde..dn 1172 C Y I E woe, 8& 105
200
—FY.
050
700 by pa,d
i CIJD
14
Seto 6 loud renihln, treld $red
D60
TO dresf by N. M. I C r In 600 S 1
_
9,50
SO
061
0.14
070
On tapes
I
070
f lmsh and plan, truck dumped Ede 18 50 per CY„ a• d rg
►IDS
ON—
ST.
080
6• deep '
�
B20 '•
130
30
I
NIULCH nand SVtad Y oeep, +rood Chips 0 110 00 Pay C Y.
2 Oso
Tl0 ,
117
DID
Peat rnast R 612,00 per C,
II
SS
STEPS 6 SIDEINALSS. set drcrslon 2640 6 45
75 �PLANE
BID prtDtateOn.lB deep DY machine
Sb
2700
Sf.
0,0
By hand
2 W6
1310 1
745
40
PtAMTlNG Masmg st".D%an Site. IT Dili
6t
19
fa
010
74' Dap
1
1l.40
5d
i 03030
Maims trees on Or 36' Dan
O
4
I 0=0
60' Dab
131
f.31
405
a5
I
SEEDINGMee`ar.�edi sec..r;,SI7510.215to/aerr
A•1
I
stir
00
fIJS/to 44:b/M5Y
405
450
SY.
030 I
,�'� fine grad,ng and teed.ng incl lime, fertilizer 6 urd.
980
1180
031 i
\��,! .,;h etlmpment
8.14
LOW
S Y
040 (
Fen,hre +pphed 15 IDS per M S F
A-1
35
MSF
041
JIT:
i.54M
060L
+Dosred 50 lbs per M S F
A i
060
Greu seed +ppixd4 A 5 IDs per M S F.
'
!00
HYdautlt Seediest Urge #fess, inti seed and fertilizer
$45
110
With .004 hoer mulch Added
'
130
Seed only, over 100 ibs, frig seed mlmmum
080 I
140
M+umum
h -vis. olottalp 1 S' to 2' sweia
Iso
Lorin Seed minimum
170
160
Muimurrt
Sprute 6' to 7' high
' iS0
serial opeUhons, serdmg anlr, held wed
B•SB
190
L#-, wed
110
Seto 6 loud renihln, treld $red
'70
Le.n Bred
SO
SODDING to Last I mch deep, on level groundmtl fine grape
0.14
070
On tapes
I
:70
In Midrest an level ground, prep+red era eve+ 400 S r
LOS
173
100 S T area
491
1 I:6
50 S Y arta
130
On tapes. 4D0 S Y ares
87
170
Poiruftinant .rth ttramic chips tar median uhp, mimnhrm
117
180
( Mu,mun,
II
SS
STEPS 6 SIDEINALSS. set drcrslon 2640 6 45
60
7RAYtt to all nururr ittmt Lot 10 to 20 miles, rod
010
30 to SO miles. add
6S
161 ES AND SHRUBS Gutta trait. 2• to a• diameter
010
6' to 10" diameter
030
O reset ,n Dietl. Balled 6 Dunapped
050
Porn alact 7' to 8' blh
070
fess toreidol 7 5' to 3 smc+d
080 I
UOr4at 7' to 75' high
100
h -vis. olottalp 1 S' to 2' sweia
_1110
Pn4e, 7' to 2 5'soread
170
Uprgat lutux's, 4' to S' high
1140_
Sprute 6' to 7' high
7.14
_
263;
35 J list,
35 J
3,209 Sy
32"
LID
T
50 Acre
50 1
SD 11j
50
470 S Y.
405 i
840
goo
750
721
1.153 ST.
87S
All
380
07
.18 I
$251
j
2
5 75
I 25
35
t 40
1 10
750
105
420
610
745
140
1 40
90
106
140
90
I55
73
I CLD I n to J1315,
f 420 35
RE C-Osl�
[jj
lis
IQTAL 1t IMct {a-
146
1146
1.73;
01,,
338
15
Is
G
57
57
2.14
7.14
_
263;
175
775
1140
; 3
49
LOS
� 132
491
116
las
22
64
87
70
117
152
17.95
11.95
21A
30
30
43L
175
125
165E
4,
745
745
3301
i
455
835
1.025
6
31
38 (
5d
X
83 I
101 f
131
S•
405
930
1125
i k
I
(
57
405
605
7 70
405
980
1180
15
!0 I!
16! i
15�
I
;+7�
a•
.5.
JIT:
i.54M
I S
121M
6'
V
7.75M
37
317
350
32
457
500
37
642 I
710
32
777 i
855
1.77
317
398
706
346
99
189
2.36
104
710
t (1
251
301
0
116
106
2,58
72
171
160
95 I
168
2.11
a`
5N
.i1
at
tON
4 71VIC
106
1045
1
26
61
Its
Q7,
OF 10 to 140 34 1 Ila 705 jy
ail 15 715 17 75 SO
52 75 655 31 55 37
80 !I 477 1771 20 l
as Ig 175 7575 71 1c.
70 35 1770 "'0 70 56
�15_I20 103 !15 .
S]'VE�!A:, RE%j IFEY.ENTS FOR EPA ASSISTED PRUJECTS
}'i
Replace entire part (5) - Wage Rates.
80 -MN -225
86-MrNN-1
E
WRIGHT COUN?Y. MINNESOTA
Ill..; C
f.i.q. 6r rf , P.r,+..,,
M.rrlr
idr ueis.
App. T,.
Asbestos workers
$14.66
.60
1.00
.15
Boilern.akers
12.30
.85
1.00
,02
9rict:layers 6 Stonemasons
11.66
.655
.93
.60
Carpenters:
-Nort. portico of county
11.5E
60
75
-Rc7.ain:�Cr cf cocr.;y
11.6(
.80
.60
.6J
.02
Ce-cnt MBSz.nr
12.43
.60
.60
Electricians:
-Jo:-•s under $50,000 value
10.00
7%
6%
101�"%
h%
-Jobs over $50,000 value
12.15
7%
6%
10�%
1R
Glaziers.
12.10
.45
.50
.35
.01
Ironu:r%C r
12.90
.65
.90
.04
LaL_rers:
-Cc-=.:n
30.05
.60
.45
.40
•-Jackhar.Ter, mortar mire-
10.20
.60
.45
..CO
-Pipelayers
10.35
.60
.45
.40
Flarble setters
12.35i
.655
.53
Painters:
-Brush 6 Roller
12.01
.65
.50
.13
-Structural steel fi spre -
12.61
.65
.50
.13
Plasterers
11.55
.50
.45
.02
Plumbers
11.94
.53
.SO
1.35
.05
Roofers:
-Cities of Monticello i
South Haven
10.10
.30
.50
-Remainder of county
12.45
.85
.50
.03
Sheet metal workers
13.02
.52
.81
.06
Steamfitters i Pipefitters
11.94
.54
.SO
1.35'
.05
!ruck dlriverst
-Eastern pert of county
10.90,
.65
.65
Power Equipment Operatorst
-Conereto Batch plant -
Ounite operator. trac. .•
tor(D-2 or similiar
sire) 6 Front MLI
loader up to 1 cubic
yard
12.03
.75
.60
.05
UnlistrA rir,!ded fur
watk not
intluded vill.iu
tl,r scer^
Of 0.0
C13stifieation: Ilsted any ot: adJcd
ifect award
only
as provleed
in
the latoor
standr.rJs contraet elauaee (29 CFF
(1) 00).
I
I
/�
Paye lY
of 3d
,� Trudes�•gPle ��,a
labor rates used in this edition are listed Deloo for bnuary 1, 1982 The
base rates are the averages of the 301n1�t cities ,n the U.S The riles
It been rounded out to the nearest 511 and the base rhes include h,nge
li
1I Iabrwn
fI ahons TRADE
I 1 S6.•
SairC e• 'an 135 nape.
---
r•;;
`
ltrem resit I: wed, an: o.,..
tlanafitsl
lo,k'_
Billing Rate /ase Rata
1115
1610
1$25 11 20 13
~bta
incl. Subs incl. hinge
Jan. 1.
Burda. e;,.-_---- -
iBrne I
Burklade, Helpers
Cam I
Carpenters
Ceti I
ClmPnt I inithe,}
Ilee
[lerl,rnant
rEler
lle.atar Con wrwir.
i
Lm I
lampment Operators Cane or Snpv eT
1
I Epmo I
[du,pment OpCratnr:, l!adrum Ednrpmpn:
975
Edit 'I
EognMeht Operators, light EQUIPMenl
1e 75
Epal I
Elu,pmenl Operators. 0 -len
77 e5 19.25 I
Eamm +
Edutpmasn Opp Atom Master Mechanics
I Clio I
@hien
4th - I
. Jt1A.s
Marti "j
Wible Seen
Mm I
Ydlmghts
Mw I
Iowa and terrazzo Wallets
w9v :
benefds bul do not include iuura lab at Wes The bribing rate figures
includell-es.mweasaeesad@a Scbteart ICWSDMtludend PAofn Set
Q, ta, funhet detaits as to tron the hgurn Uwe derived
in. L• M
Nistaical Use labor nates
9 }L_Sf ILIO
'1195`
r•;;
1190 �E�lo_r'If
_ 1� SO 1310 11
(incl. triage
tlanafitsl
-
Billing Rate /ase Rata
1115
1610
1$25 11 20 13
_r
incl. Subs incl. hinge
Jan. 1.
Jin. 1.
tae. 1.
tan 1.
0 t P benefits
1981
1180
1979
1978
_
$2500 517.15
$1560 I
11»25
51335
S!250
193, 13.35
-
1210
1!05
I03t
975
7570-1775
1E 10
1e 75
I3e5 I
130E
77 e5 19.25 I
1760
!6:°_
Ic35
14"
l9 an 1355 I
1220
N
IE-. ,_5
7-
"7730
j7 5f_ 1875 !
16 ES
:53C,
i -1K
13°-
_ 76 OC I 19:05
1720
15 Eb
I lac: 1
13 76
24 85 I 17.60
1560
14 5D
I !3=5
1265
I 19.65
I 13.90
1250 !
Il a5
1065
995
I 11,35
17.00
1530 I
11 10
I 13-70 I
17 40
13,0
16.50
1505 I
13,80
1 12 S' I
1215
11700
19.10_
17 d0I
16 05
1 Id a
13 tri
1 2690_
1115
1695 I
IS SD
I Id 75 1
13:%_
15 65 17.80
16 DO
1165
1380 I
13 05
7d.9517.10
:5 EO
:125
:3 »C '
;: 60
8$ 70 16.15
14 75
13.50
1270
1195
Ij+
11.45 11.90
13 35
12.15
11.55
1085
16.75
15.30
11.60
13.65 I
15:$0
13.80
1LtiD
1205 I
t.t., !
- 1115
1360
V 75
12.05 I
Rid .' ,e rp
15m
13,95
13 OD
12.10 I
19.11 S' i
1580
11.50
U40
12.75 I
�A�M9
11.85
13.70
MW .'
12.00 I
Pard I Pewtea, Ordinate JIM 1320 .1730 11,65ftg j: 111JONIM an'
I
171Da ;1':'.�apttAinebl��_1t'vLow, V.. a.:� 'S k.�
I RN 7 •�k Dines t"t'. n `•l ° j : t r t Plaw11,
13.603.R0 • a U.1D I
I Rlae•.•.+'.-�-�7Ljletb'ISMMn'r �•p: 1;: tl "•tI '� Ca�l.iBM I thLtn t3�?v]��R
Stan _
' Ss•1
ml.mlTsOF" temeri
Stene Me,om
Shuawal 51er1 NJrarrs ~`
9 }L_Sf ILIO
'1195`
•r asi
15 75
1190 �E�lo_r'If
_ 1� SO 1310 11
s
iF
-
1115
1610
1$25 11 20 13
_r
l,r
-
hit i;ven PIN'!
- ?I $S-_
'_1i.7o`
II es
61T 70 li
s
hlr _.
Iib
ldr�laver ffoi;pr5
hurl Drove's l,pr;` s
-" II Is
-
_ l3GS _
_1200
_1355 _
- 1110 P_1063 _R_9
�_11
hnr _ Iruc1 Dn.rn Heavv
Welded. Shut!uul3siei
1915
_ r 19 75
_13.70
_ 11,10 _
is Rs `
I 1.215
.0
1t io-s
D'•" 155C B
_11.60 10 73 !0
X525 I4.20 - 13
13 55
12 a
'l l 15ID
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
,uws 129181123
aa•pe.11ab
OUR SCHLLLN, MAYERON a ASSOCIATES, INC.
a •too, ca+s11*•*+s >c
try rc7+uf+w�w.t.,,.rl lwnIts sw.e
o.+recto. Paul A. Laurence co. Chorpe Order No. 81
care„ P.O. Sox 1267, 10000 Highway 55 West riefd Molit. No. 113
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 Project to. 068-2748.01
ode Locat ion Monticello, Minnesota EPA Oren ND0270855-03
.n accordance .Ith the ceras of your contract doted November 20 tV 80 este
city of Monticello Owne* for WWTP Upgrading and Appurtenant Work
rw are heroat roquestod to cOnnpty with the toy to.t ng ouInges trap the contract plans and specl t tcst Ions:
usscr ipt ton and just i t icat ion: - Rotor to (told siodif #113 {A"Itchad) .
This change order provides for additional seeding and sodding in
coordination with the expanded fence limits to ensure adequate erosion
ccntrcl and turf restoration.
Crackdown of Costs this Change Order:
Lfnor1Q41008"Material Plrotlt 1 Owerheed Totel Add total Deduct
53,875.00 51,754 $843.00 $6,468.00 1
Anwat of Original Contract: 1 4,704,000.00
Tofei Controct
trod Thra C,O. 0„S0 Total Addltlo. total Dove Thre 1'Ale C.O. 181
�$4,915,943.07 f $6,468.00 $4,922,411.07
Original Continganclas 411) S
sat Repsinlnp
{c,*. Thru C.O. t y Add TSIs C.O. Deduct This C.O. Contingencies
A
VINs•• .III be on owtan►Idn of 0 den for cunpiet fan.
7110 or,* of the Car, irlon of Corvact .as May 31 g83 and no..ui as May 31 T�13 .
C.casted by Data ltahed
Contras o,
aecsendsd at ,, ��=./�� Sats SIG -ad ----1.3Q` 912
(K meat
A00.4.40 of 2 _ Fats stoned
aqwffl
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
ww saw saarr sm
Pao ssantso
OIa1 5CNEILN•a1A CV ASSOCIATES. INC.
Is.o�o• a wI0(X ma cd„Su, r.«n, eK
am. Uri «tw«e•.w awe we raw—laep4 e«.2•1"131331ere Tw obi ,
Contractor Paul A. Laurence Co. Charge Order ft. 84
Addrns P.O. Box 1267, 10000 Highway 55 West field fbdlf, f. 122
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 Project lb. 068-2748.01
Job Location Monticello, Minnesota EPA ftrant looC210855-03
In accordance with the teras of your contract dated November 20 1980 .ith
City of Monticello Owner for WWTP Upgrading and Appurtenant Work
you are hereby reduestea to cOnjiy with the following o%onges from the contract plans and spaciflcetlons:
Description and Justification: - peter to rleld Modlt 1122 m"whedl
]n order to reduce grit spillaqe off the grit conveyor belt, a grit hopper
and a qrit dewatering tray are required for effective continual conveyance and
to allow proper maintenance of the system,
a•.aadown of Costs this Change order: 1
Labor Epu Ipaint Prof It .Overhead Tote- Add Total Deduct J
$480.00 Material) 51,475 00 $300.00 I 52,405.00
iSubcon) $ 150.00
Amount of Original Contract: 1 4,704,000.00
• Toea1 Contract
owtrert Thru C.O. j? Total Addlt-on Total Deduct Thr u TAIs C.O.
IC
$4,929,445.07 I $2,405.00 I $4,931,650.07
Or 191ael Contingencies (31) 1
NO na
IW..t, Thru C.O. f I Ada This C.O. I Deduct This C.O. I Cowtlnpanclas
11wer..11l be an erten, Iflw of 0 days for completion.
The fate of the clsDlet-on of Carl,*& as May 31 , •1®3 ane now ells bal!Ay 31 to 83.
Accapr.d by Data ficnad
con.. •a• J
s.cr�enoed by L -�,{P� Data 110-0
[ np
Aoo•awad or _�� Det. Slowae
o.n.•
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
[itelf�e Iee,rm
&AN a MTM ONA-SCHEIEN-MAYERON A ASSOCIATES. INC.
o�aow a oma coraw,•rte. e.c
dew,sAa+,liare..werlsuntrsr�h.hnuwoww,se,aah�c,.r.Sow
Contractor Paul A. Laurence Co. Change Order de. 85
Address P.O. Box 1267, 10000 Highway 55 West 126
Field Madill. his.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 Project ib. 068-2748.01
Job LOcatlon Monticello, Minnesota EPl( Oran, Ib5270855-03
In accordance with the terms of your contract dated November 20 1980 with
City of Monticello Owner for h'WTP Upgrading and Appurtenant Work
yw are hereby requested to cowrl, with the following Changes from the contracr plena and speel fleet lona:
peurlpt Ion and justification: - Refer to fleld Modlf 0126 (Attached)
In order to comply with the Uniform Building Code, OS11A, and the 17ational
Fire Protection Association regulations, exit and safety signs are required
fcr the plant.
.akdorn Of Coate th is Change Order:
Labor
$480.00
Equlpeent(Material
I $650.00
Profit 4Overfhead
1 $169.00
Total Add
I 51,229.00
Total Deduct
Aouhn of Original Contract: 1 4.704,000.00
Tde1 Ca,traet
Contract Thr. C.O. 0_ft4
Total addition
I
Tatel Deduct
Thr 9 ThIn C.O. 1 85
$4,931,850.07
$1,229.00
$4.933,079.07
Original Contingencies (31) 1 .
Reassining
Cont. Thry C.O. 0
I
I add 11h1s C.O.
I Deduct This C.O.
I cart apneles
There 9111 be on eutenslon of 0 days for casplefloh.
The dale of the Completion of Contra+ was May 31 N 83 and now ani
be May 31 19 83
cooled by
We finned
Cc f C -tor
Reccoaended by L --.W '� L( .1� \.QY� v_
1 p Fh%r
We l laaad 1.JJ q J .3
app,o.ed by \
Doe llened
Owner
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
tYltee IeelellO
mn adders"
OUR*SCHELEN-NAYERON A ASSOCIATES. INC.
o.mb. a .ma co.em+..Ta,1c
oAowV=*6.1111 -E-wFw+..we W11 121.1-1.•0X,1 .4 M.ts0.a a+am T,Ns OaeM
contractor Paul A. Lauience Co. Change order No. 96
Address P.O. Box 1267, 10000 Highway 55 West Field tbeif. w. 129
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 Roject No. 068-2748.01
Job Location Monticello, Minnesota crow Grant iibC270955-03
in accordance with the terms of your contract dated November 20 1980 with
City of Monticello owner for WWTP Upgrading and Appurtenant work
lou a•e herebt rao.es,so to coy;-, with the following changes from the contract Plans and specifications:
Do", Got ion end lust if scat fo+: - Rate, to flef6 04"1f 0129 (wtteched)
:, guard for the 3" nethane gas line in the Aeration Cquiprlent Building is
required to protect the pipe from danaae when equipment is brounkit up or down
the stairs.
Breakdown of Costs this Change order:
:Labor Eoulpaent(Materlal profit S Overhead Total Add Total Deduct
$205.00 1 $135.00 1 $51.00 $391.00 I
Amount of Or191nal Contact: S 4,704.000.00 111
TdtN Contract A
(Contract Thru C,O. f 85 Taal Addition
Total Deduct Tlw Tela C.O. rb
$4,933,019.07 $391.00 $4,933,170.87
0,191.61 Contingencies G31t S
Wt Remetatfq
Cont, Thru C.O. / Ada Th Is C.O. Deduct This C.0. ( CoflagleeclN
There will been eet6nsloa of 0 days for completion.
rn• nate of the eo*p16T+on of CewMay 31 83 148y 31,tr6e+
6 , t9 arae now will b6 , to
83
Accpled by Det• Slated
(',pntt {two.*�(� //'/1 , �{1(y. y, � !Y�
Aecoeendoo it __J��r�� — "' '�Y -� L' Wallowa, wa, 21,12141 A s
E n71 oyer
ApaaeO �' ... �� _� Oere L16aad
-Y Owner
i
11
Council Agenda - 1/24/82
14. Consideration of Approval of Fire Contract with Silver Creek Town-
ship for 1984 through 1986. (R.W.)
In September, 1981, the City Council approved entering into a two
year contract for fire protection services with Silver Creek Town-
ship for the years 1982 and 1983. The contracts called for a
$6,000 standby charge in 1982 and $8,000 standby charge for 1983
with no cost being charged per fire call. This particular method
was favored by Silver Creek Township Board over the previous
method of a lower standby charge and an hourly fee for each fire
call as they were able to budget correctly from year to year with
a flat charge.
Recently, Jessie Beyl, Silver Creek Township Clerk requested that
the joint Fire Board prepare a new fire contract to cover the
years 1984 through 1986. Although the current contract does not
expire until December 31st, 1983, the Silver Creek Board request-
ed that a new contract be prepared for 1984 through 1986 as they
must set their budget for the year 1984 at their annual meeting
coming up in March, 1983.
In order to arrive at a new contract price, the fixed cost of
operating the Monticello Fire Department for the year 1983 was
determined from the uudget witn an inflation factor of iia
added for determining the fixed coats for the years 1984, 1985
and 1986. In reviewing the fire calls during the last five
years from 1978 through 1982, it was determined that Silver
Creek Township has approximately 16% of all fire calls and by
multiplying this 16% times the average fixed cost estimated for
the years 84 through 86, it was determined that Silver Creek
Township would have to pay approximately $5,400 annually as a
standby charge just to cover the fixed cost of having the fire
department available. In addition, Silver Crock averages ap-
proximately 8 fires per year over the past five years. The
estimated cost of attending a one hour fire was estimated to
average $225 for a one hour fire and $125 for each additional
hour. By combining the average number of fires plus the standby
charge, the total estimated cost of $7,325 per year was arrived
at. If Silver Creek Township chose to go with the current
method of a flat charge to cover all fire calls, the joint fire
board recommended that the annual cMrgo be oat at $7,250 par
year, which they felt would be sufficient to cover the antici-
patod fire calls.
This information was presented to the Silver Croak Board and
recently the board approved entering into a now throe year con-
tract for tho years 1963 through 19BG at the flat charge of
17,250 per year.
- 13 -
�i
C,
Council Agenda - 1/24/83
Enclosed, you will find a copy of the proposed contract that has
been approved by the Silver Creek Township Board and the Joint
Fire Board. If this new contract is approved by the City Council,
it will be also forwarded to the Monticello Township Board for
final approval.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of approval of fire contract for
1984 through 1986 with Silver Creek Township calling for an annual
charge of $7,250 with no additional cost per fire call.
REFERENCES: A copy of the proposed contract and copies of calcu-
lations used to arrive at a new contract amount.
- 14 -
EXHIBIT A
This EXHIBIT is a part of the attached FIRE PROTECTION AGREEMENT,
and its purpose is to designate the area covered under this AGREEMENT
and referred to herein as the TOWNSHIP area. Therefore, the TOWNSHIP
area in which protection for fires is agreed to involves the following
sections of the TOWNSHIP herein:
Sections 9, 14, 15, 16, 22, 23, 24. 25, 26, 27, 34, 35, 36,
North half of Section 20, Section 21 except Southwest Quarter,
and Southeast Quarter of Southeast Quarter of Section 33,
Township 122, Range 26; Section 1, 2, 11, 12, 13, 14 except
Southwest Quarter all in Township 121, Range 26.
CITY OF MONTICELLO TOWNSHIP OF SILVER CREEK
By By
Mayor Chairman
Attest: Attest:
Clerk Clerk
TOWNSHIP OF MONTICELLO
By
Chairman
Attest:
Clerk
CITY OF MONTICELLO
By:
Mayor
Attests
Clark
Signed this day of
day VC , 1503.
TOWNSHIP OF MONTICELLO
By
Chairman
Attest
Clark
Signed this day of
TOWNSHIP OF SILVER CREEK
By:
Chairman
Attests
Clerk
1983. Signed this
J
1983.
M
FIRE PROTECTION AGREEMENT
This AGREEMENT between the City and Township of Monticello, Monticello,
Minnesota, hereafter referred to as the JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT, and the
Township of Silver Creek, hereafter referred to whether in whole or in
part as the TOWNSHIP. Both agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
The JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT agrees to furnish fire service and fire
protection to all properties subject to the terms of this agreement, within
the TOWNSHIP area, said area being act forth in EXHIBIT A, attached hereto.
ARTICLE II
The JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT will make a reasonable effort to attend
all fires within the TOWNSHIP area upon notification of ouch fire or fires,
and under the direction of the JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT fire chief, subject
to the following terms and conditions:
A. Road and weather conditions must be such that the fire run can
be mala with 6asoral:la marety to tho firamen a:..
r of the JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT. The decision of the fire chief
or other officer in charge of the fire department at the time
that the fire run cannot be made with reasonable safety to
firemen and equipment shall be final.
B. Tho JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT shall not be liable to the TOWNSHIP
for the loss or damage of any kind whatever resulting from any
failure to furnish or any delay in furnishing fireman or fire
equipment, or from any failure to prevent, control or extinguish
any fire, whether such loss or damage'ie caused by the negli-
gence of the officers, agents or employees of the JOINT FIRE
DEPARTMENT or its fire department, or otherwise.
ARTICLE III
The JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT further agrees: %
A. To keep and maintain in good order at its own expense the necessary
equipment and fire apparatus for fire service and fire protection
within the town area so serviced.
B. The JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT shall provide sufficient manpower in its
fire department to operate fire equipment.
ARTICLE IV
The TOWNSHIP agrees:
A. To pay an annual fee of $7,250.00 for the years 1984 thru
1986. These fees should include all standby charges and fire call
costs.
B. Annual fee shall be paid as follows:
prior to January let of each year -- 25%
prior to April let of each year -- 25%
prior to July let of each year -- 25%
prior to October lot of each year -- 25%
C. All payments must be made in accordance with this schedule to render
thio agreement effective for calendar years 1984 thru 1986. Additionally,
any amount past due for 1983 must be paid by March 31, 1984.
_. .... ..,._... r RE DCh.R+..-.;T will -_slit a _-.:_:ary _- the ._,...-..; of ❑1`
fires on a monthly basis. J
ARTICLE V
In case an emergency arises within the JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT while
equipment and personnel of the fire department are engaged in fighting a
fire within the TOWNSHIP area, calls shall be answered in the order of
their receipt unless the fire chief or other officer in charge of the
fire department at the time otherwise directs. In responding to fire
calla within the TOWNSHIP.area, the fire chief or, other officer in charge
shall dispatch only such personnel and equipment as in his opinion
can to safely eparod from the JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT.
ARTICLE VI
In cases where the JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT receives a notification
of an emergency, other than a fire, and its assistance is requested in
the area dofined in Exhibit A of thin contract, it shall respond to such
emergency in the soma manner as a fire an outlined in this contract.
Charges for such service shall be as outlined in ARTICLE IV.
ARTICLF. VII
The TOW14SHIP agrees to make a fire protection tax levy or other-
wiae to provide funds each year in an amount sufficient to pay the JOINT
FIRE DEPARTMENT the compensation heroin agreed upon.
ARTICLE VIII
This AGREEMENT shall be in force for a term of 3 years be-
ginning on January 1, 1984 and ending on the 31st day of December, 1986.
Thio contract may be terminated upon a six month notice by either party.
0
\ OF TOTAL HOURS - FIREMEN 1978 to 1982
Tow:nahip of Monticello 44.90♦
City of Monticello 32.24%
Silver Creek Township 16.03\
Otsego Township 2.01♦
Outside Assistance 4.82♦
100.00%
ALLOCATION OF FIXED COSTS TO SILVER CRZrK TOWNSHIP
Silver Creek 16.031 X $101198 3 - $5400
RECOMMEND THE F01.IX WTNG OPTIONS: (3 Year Contract)
1. Standby Charge of $5,400.00
Hourly Foot 4
let hour at 225.00 X Average (8) Fires - $1,800.00
2nd hour at 125.00 X Averago (1) Fire 125.00 $1,925.00
ESTIMATED COST $7,325.00
2. Standby Charge of 4,000.00
Hourly Foot
Jut hour at 400.00 X Avelugo (0) Fires + $3,200.00
2nd hour at 125.00 X Avnrago (1) Fire 125.00 3,325.00
EST"YATFD COST $7,325.00
3. Flat Charge for all fire :alis $7,250.00
ALLOCATION OF FIRE COSTS TO SILVER CREEK
[s
1983 BUDGET (Fixed Costs)
Telpehone
550.00
Utilities
3,210.00
Salaries - Drills (Est)
1,800.00
Supplies
1,200.00
Legal
- 0 -
Training
3,200.00
Insurance
2,500.00
Other
100.00
Re
Building pairs
200.00
SUBTOTAL
12,760.00
Depreciation
Equipment - 10 years $57,117.00
5,712.00
Trucks - 20 years $156,363.00
7,818.00
Buildings - 25 years 37,594.00
1,504.00
BUDGET 1983 (Fixed Costs)
$27,794.00
Estimate
1984 + 10*
30,573.00
1985 + 10\
33,631.00
1986 + 10\
36,994.00
A
Iy,.
ESTIMATED TOTAL 3 YEARS
$101,198.00
\ OF TOTAL HOURS - FIREMEN 1978 to 1982
Tow:nahip of Monticello 44.90♦
City of Monticello 32.24%
Silver Creek Township 16.03\
Otsego Township 2.01♦
Outside Assistance 4.82♦
100.00%
ALLOCATION OF FIXED COSTS TO SILVER CRZrK TOWNSHIP
Silver Creek 16.031 X $101198 3 - $5400
RECOMMEND THE F01.IX WTNG OPTIONS: (3 Year Contract)
1. Standby Charge of $5,400.00
Hourly Foot 4
let hour at 225.00 X Average (8) Fires - $1,800.00
2nd hour at 125.00 X Averago (1) Fire 125.00 $1,925.00
ESTIMATED COST $7,325.00
2. Standby Charge of 4,000.00
Hourly Foot
Jut hour at 400.00 X Avelugo (0) Fires + $3,200.00
2nd hour at 125.00 X Avnrago (1) Fire 125.00 3,325.00
EST"YATFD COST $7,325.00
3. Flat Charge for all fire :alis $7,250.00
ACTUAL EXPENSES - HOURLY FIRE COSTS
J
From December 1981 thru December 1982 59 Fires
1962 Projected Expenses
Gas and Oil $850.00 = 59 a $15.00
Equipment 6 Repair - $3100.00 - 59 - 53.00
Salaries (Average 16 men during 1982 at
$7.00 per hour) 112.00
Administration Costs 10.00
$190.00
Estimated Cost for Year 1983 - 1986
1983 + 10% -
209.00 hour
1984 + 10% -
230.00
1985 + 10% -
253.00
1986 + 10% -
278.00
970.00
970.00 : 4 1st hour average
242.00
2nd hour (16 men at 5.00)
80.00
1983 + 10% -
BB.00
1984 + 10♦ a
97.00 }
1985 + 100 -
106.00 J
1986 + 10% -
117.00
408.00
408 c 4 2nd hour average
102.00
RECOMMEND:
Hourly Fee for lot hour at
225.00
Hourly Fee for 2nd hour at
125.00
NOTE: Lowered lot hour average and increased 2nd hour
average cost because equipment, repair costs would
probably increase some during the 2nd hour
of a fire.
-'perp-------
Council Agenda - 1/24/83
15. Consideration of an Appointment to fill the Position of
Wastewater Mechanic/Laborer. (T. E.)
There were over 200 applicants for the position of Wastewater
Mechanic/Laborer and of those 200 applicants, it was narrowed
down to 10 people that were interviewed personally and taken
through the wastewater Treatment Plant. Of these 10 people,
three final candidates were selected, 2 from Anoka and one
from Maple Lake, and were interviewed by John, Jim and myself
on Thursday. John Simola will have the details pertaining
to this at Monday evening's meeting.
C
C
GENERAL FUND - JAN ARY - 1983
AMOUNT
CHECK N(
W. H. Cates Const. - Final payment of Library const.
5,000.00
16817
MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees
313.00
16818
MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees
51.00
16819
T b T Radiators - Truck radiator repair
450.00
16820
State Treasurer - Social Security Cont. Fund - FICA - Dec.
4,185.07
16821
MN. Pollution Control Agency - Reg. fees for Matt T. seminar
40.00
16822
Thomas Schumacher - Salary through Jan. 7
160.00
16823
MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees
98.00
16824
Monticello Public Library - Petty cash reimbursement
363.09
16825
Foto Hut - 6 rolls films - WWTP
24.48
16826
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded•
179.04
16827
Gayle Bortz - Reg. fees for Leg. Conf. - Rick and Tom
70.00
16828
Jerry Hermes - Janitorial - Library
115.00
16829
Reg. Dept. of Conferences - Conf. for Rick -
60.00
16830
Paul A. Laurence Co. - Payment 923 - WWTP
58,620.70
16831
Monticellu Fire Dept. - Payroll
1,140.OU
16632
M.P.C.A. - Operator's seminar - Ref. fees for Albert Meyer
40.00
16833
Banker's Life Ins. - Croup Ins.
2,451.99
16834
Wright County State Bank - To open a new checking account
3,000.00
16835
Monticello Times - Misc. pub.'
502.11
16836
OSM - Eng, fees for Nov. - 1982
6,032.20
16837
let Bank Mple. - '75 Maint. 6 '75 G. 0. Imp, bonds
85,253.40
16838
Fidelity Bank 6 Trust - 71 Water 4 C. 0. Bonds
22,941.14
16839
Northwestern Nat'l. Bank of Mpls. - 76, 77, 79, 80 - Lib. 4
605,866.10
16840
81 G. 0. Bonds
lot Bank St. Paul - '78 Bond
214,160.x0
16941
Curtis Industries - Misc. nuts and bolts
112.07
16842
Howard Dahlgren Assoc. - Nov. 6 Dec. planning fees
409.20
16843
St. Paul Press 6 Dispatch - Adv. for Laborer/mechanic position
93.60
16844
MN. Municipal Finance Officers Assoc. - Dues - 1983
10.00
16845
Leef Bros. - Uniforms for employees
139.50
16846
Monticello Rotary Club - Dues for Tom Eidem
156.16
16847
Bergstrom', Lawn 4 Garden - Bolen tractor repair - snow blower
139.36
16848
Miller Davis Co. - Supplies - license books
13.40
16849
SMA Elevator - Repairs to light pole and enow'plow
198.97
16850
Amoco Oil Co. - oil for Fire Dept.
1.50
16851
State of MN. - State Register 6 Public Documents - Sub. renewal
130.00
16852
MN. Dep. R1:g. Assoc. - Dop. Reg. dues - 1983
50.00
16853
National Life Ins. - T. Eidem pension plan payment
85.00
16854
North Central Public Service - Utilities
2,038.12
16855
Tom Eidem - Misc. mileage
81.33
16856
Local 049 - Union dues
56.00
16857
Monticello Agency - Tom Eidem bond
50.00
16858
Adams Peat Control - Library post control
35.00
16859
Maus Foods - Supplies for all Depts.
138.59
16860
Power Process Equip. - WWTP supplies
262.76
16861
let Bank Minneapolis - Activity charge
4.00
16862
Northwestern Bell - Piro phone
36.43
16863
Commissioner of Revenue - SWT - Dec. - 82
2,042.00
16864
Automatic Garage Door - Cate opener at WWTP
1,732.00
16865
MN. State Treasurer - PERA W/H
485.12
16866
Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone
917.57
16867
Harry's Auto Supply - St. and Sever Dept. supplies
235.57
16868
Paper, Calmanson b Co. - Plow blade for grader
225.60
16869
Sherburne County Equipment - Bal. dux on Allis Chalmers tractor
7,495.00
16870
MN. Park Supervisor's Assoc. - Membership dues for Roger Mack
15.00
16871
GENERAL FUND
AMOUNT
CHECK Ni
Water Products - I" meters, connections, volves,pipe, etc.
755.77
168"
Foster Franzen Agency - Fire Dept. bond 6 public officials liab.
insurance
1,556.46
16873
Viking Industrial Center - Danger tags for WWTP
51.00
16874
J M Oil Co. - Diesel fuel 6 oil
664.43
16875
The Plumbery - Materials for bathroom in sludge vehicle garage
22.08
16876
Hayes Contractors - Repairs to sever line at dog pound
641.30
16877
Marco Business Products - Toner for copy machine
48.00
16878
Wright County Auditor - Homestead notices for 1983
146.74
16879
Cruys, Johnson b Assoc. - Computer processing - Nov.
290.00
16880
Fyles Backhoe Service - Digging at Mont. Dev. property on River
St. 405.00
16881
Zep Mfg. Co. - Brushes, handles, lubricant for Sever plant
213.16
16882
Wright County Sheriff - Dec. police contract
7,349.33
16883
Olson's Electric - Wiring heat cables at city hall, repairs to
1,065.39
16884
street light b install automatic clock for Christmas liter,
wiring at emergency pump building
McCarthy Well Co. - Inspection of deep well turbine pumps
109.00 '
16885
Heskin's Electric - Outlet for video read-out machine at Library
50.65
16886
Heskin's Electric b Wright County State Bank - Parking lot
4,750.00
16887
lighting at Library
Floor Care Supply Co. - Entrance mat for Library
238.98
16888
MN. State Treasurer - Pumping report fee
5.00
16889
League of MN. Cities- 3 municipal directories for 1983
30.00
16890
Cylinder City, Inc. - Repair cylinder on snow plow truck
23.26
16891
Payroll for December
21,498.61
/
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS - JANUARY
$1,069,020.25
LIQOCRI FUND
LIQUOR DISBURSEMENTS - JANUARY - 1983
ANXW
CEMCK
90.
Commissioner of Revenue - SWT - Nov.
235.00
10533
MN. State Treasurer - FICA - Nov.
435.87
10534
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded. - Mark Irmiter
20.00
10535
Wright County State Bank - Investments
35,000.00
10536
MN. State Treasurer - Pero W/H
97.39
10537
Banker's Life Ins. - Group Ins.
276.58
10538
Monticello Times - Adv.
183.50
10539
Ed Phillips 6 Sons - Liquor
6,470.45
10540
Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone
51.03
10541
Cruys, Johnson - Computer processing - Oct.
110.00
10542
Marco Business Products - Store expense
49.43
10543
James Refrigeration - Add'n. to walk in cooler
1,447.00
10544
Twin City Wine - Liquor
543.00
10545
Johnson Bros. - Liquor.
174.06
10546
Old Peoria Co. - Liquor
535.24
10547
Commissioner of Revenue - Sales tax
3,363.60
10548
Midwest Wine Co. - Liquor
749.61
10549
Ed Phillips 6 Sons - Liquor
5,744.37
10550
Twin City Wine - Liquor
1,969.57
10551
Griggs, Cooper 6 Co. - Liquor
1,954.89
10552
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded. - Mark Irmiter
20.00
10553
MN. State Treasurer - Pero W/H
245.22
10554
w- ^'•t Coy!. Stat_ °a^.k - FIa7 9:
5919.10 .
State Treasurer - FICA - Dec. - 82^-
483.24
10556
` State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded. - Mark Irmiter
20.00
10557
B 6 U Carpet Services - Clean carpet at Store
320.00
10558
North Central Public Service - Utilities
327.59
10559
Northern States Power - Utilities
460.31
10560
Ed Phillips 6 Sons - Liquor
3,266.55
10561
Griggs, Cooper 6 Co. - Liquor
3,388.71
10562
Twin City Wine - Liquor
2,094.00
10563
Coast to Coast - Store supplies
23.06
10564
Banker's Life Ins. - Group Ins.
276.58
10565
Maus Foods - Misc. store supplies
24.01
10566
Yonak Sanitation - Contract - sanitation
97.50
10567
A. J. Ogle - Beer
356.05
10568
Dick Beverage - Beer
4,143.00
10569
Crosslein Beverage. Co. - Beer
10,936.82
10570
Thorpe Dist. Co. - Beer
2,044.85
10571
Dahlheimcr Dist. Co. - Beer
5,539.27
10572
7 Up Bottling Co. - Misc. mdse.
422.35
10573
Viking Coca Colo - Mi6e, mdse.
631.55
10574
Old Dutch Foods - Misc. mdse.
117.48
10575
Jude Candy 6 Tobacco - Misc. mdse.
357.10
10576
Leifsrt Trucking - Freight
410.89
10577
Maus Foods - Misc, sides.
18.07
10578
KMOM - Adv.
165.00
10579
Gronseth Directory Service - Adv, in telephone directory
36.60
10580
CBridgewater Telephone - Telephone
1.41
10581
Ed Phillips 6 Sons - Liquor
5,455.21
10582
Wright County State Bank - To open now checking account
3,000.00
10583
Commissioner of Revenue - SWT - Dec.
257.00
10584
lot Bank Mpls. - Liquor store revenue bonds - '76
23,475.00
10585
Monticello Times - Adv.
210.70
10586
Payroll for Dec. II
4 375 12
TOTAL DISDURSEXENT8 - JANUARY
A '132,930.57
COUNCIL UPDATE
February 14, 1983
After a discussion with Arve about the Meadow Oak public hearing,
I have elected to simply delete it from the agenda format proper.
The people involved with Meadow Oak are still struggling with and
have not resolved the land ownership problem, so that everything
we do at this point is contingent upon final ownership being re-
solved. Rather than carrying this public hearing from meeting to
meeting, I have simply deleted it from the agenda and when the
principals involved with Meadow Oak are ready to present all of the
final information concerning title to the land, we will then for-
mally reopen the hearing and close it on the same time. Thus,
even though the public hearing does not appear on your copy of the
agenda, it has not been closed and will have to be addressed again
in the future.
Regarding arcade licensing and/or a loitering ordinance, Gary Pringle
and I have begun work on that already. I do not anticipate having a
final copy of either kind of ordinance prepared for reading at this
meeting. Hopefully, we can complete what is necessary by the last
meeting in February so that it could be enacted at that time. Also,
Al Corrow called me and told me he was going to be out of town for
quite some time so no wouie not on aoic to alt Qewn dlx] wwrR VUL Like
final details of a re -negotiated garbage contract. I said fine; I
was in no hurry, and that we could talk as soon as he gets back.
I told him to contact me at his convenience. I lot him know that
if he and I agreed upon the contract, I would bring it to the
Council for ratification and he is willing to accept that.
OI ,., ,
You are receiving two agendas this week. After theinformal dis-
cussion after the last meeting, several of us discussed the pos-
ibility of initiating a consent agenda format in order to speed
up the handling of City business at meetings. You aro receiving
your regular agenda and supplement and I anticipate you will
choose to conduct the meeting in that manner. For your reference,
I have included the consent agenda and a supplement with that. It
contains the exact same information.
A consent agenda is simply a tool for speeding the handling of
routine type business. Simply put, a determination is made when
the agenda is being prepared as to what items could be considered
as part of the consent agenda. In the consent agenda supplement,
you will notice that the narrative explains what position you would
be taking if you adopted the consent agenda as written. Basically,
what you are doing in handling as many motions as possible in a
single motion. There is no discussion allowed other than for
clarification or point of information on some factual data. Part
of the responsibility for a successful consent agenda falls on you
j' the members of the Council. If you have questions, it becomes your
obligation to nook out the answers prior to the meeting, rathor than
Council Update
February 14, 1983
Page #2
using meeting time for general information gathering. Also, any par-
ticular item that a particular Council person would wish to discuss
at length or felt strongly opposed to can be removed from the consent
agenda by a simple motion and second and majority vote. Thus, if there
were five items on the consent agenda and one of you wish to discuss
one of the items at length, you would simply move that that item be
removed from the consent agenda for further discussion as an individual
item. with proper second and vote, that item would be removed and
would be taken up for separate discussion after the motion to adopt
the consent agenda. This is being submitted to you now primarily as
a follow along guide. we are hoping that you can see the merit of
switching to a consent agenda in order to handle routine matters. We
are willing to prepare duplicate agendas for the next couple of
meetings so that you can compare the workings of each kind of an
agenda as the meetings proceed.
C
C