Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 01-28-1985/ AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL l Monday, January 28, 1 985 - 7:30 P.M. Mayor: Arve A. Grimsmo Council Members: Fran Fair, William Fair, Jack Maxwell, Dan Blonigen. 1. Call to Order. 2. Approval of Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held January 14, 1985. 3. Citizens Comments/Pet It ions, Requests, and Complaints. New Business d. Consideration of a Proposal from Howard Dahlqren 6 Associates to do a Downtown Redevelopment Plan. 5. Consideration of a Farmers Home Administration Financed Housing Proposal for Low and Moderate Income Families. ( 6. Consideration of Bingo License - Applicant, Knights of Columbus. 7. Consideration of Supporting Monticello Township in their Opposition to a Turnback of a County Road. 8. Consideration of Developing Softball Fields. 9. Department Head Reports. 10. Consideration of Bills for the Month of January. 11. Adjournment. I MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL L, January 14, 1985 - 7:30 P.M. Members Present: Mayor Arve Grimsmo. Fran Fair, Bill Fair, Jack Maxwell, Dan Blonigen. 1. Call to order. 2. Oath of Office for Newly Elected Officiale. City Administrator, Tom Eidem, issued the oath of office to the newly elected officials, Council members William Fair and Dan Blonigen, along with the Mayor, Arve Grimace. 3. Approval of Minutes. Motion was made by Blonigen, seconded by Maxwell, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting hold December 10, 1984, and the special mooting hold December 27, 1984, as presented. voting in favor was Blonigen, Grimace, Dill Fair, with Maxwell and Fran Fair abstaining duo to absence at the special meeting. 5. Public Nearing - Petition for Vacation of 6th Street - Applicant, LiConstruction 5, Inc. In November, 1984, Construction 5, Inc., petitioned the Council to consider vacating Gth Street lying adjacent to Block 41 in Lower Monticello to facilitate the development of the property for future apartment buildings. In light of the request, the City recommended that the developer consider roplatting all of their property in Lower Monticello to create now lots: and the City could than consider vacating not only 6th Street adjacent to Block 41, but also other dead and portions of undeveloped Washington and Hennepin Streets in the same, vicinity. A preliminary sketch plan wan presented after a coating was hold with the developer, along with the City Planner and City Engineer, that shows an extension of Lauring Lana that tiea in with Copeland Road near the Malone property. The Malonae have indicated they would be willing to Bell to the City a portion of their property that would enable the Lauring Lane road to extend through for future development into Maurice Hoglund -0 property and eventually connect to County Road 118. _ Basad on the preliminary sketch, the City would be vacating 1 approximately 106,447 square foot of platted road area to Construction 5, Inc., while Construction 5 would be dedicating u .02 Council Minutes - 1/14/85 Q approximately 84,000 square feet of new road area. Although _ J the exact figures have not been yet worked out, there would be a difference in square footage given up versus new street area dedicated. which would be determined at a later date as to whether any compensation would be required from the developer for the additional land he is acquiring. Hearing no public comments regarding the vacation of the above streets, Motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Blonigen, and unanimously carried to give prelimina vy approval to the concept of replotting and directiny the developer to proceed with his preliminary plat as proposed with the final compensation (if any) to be determined during the final. platting process. 6. Variance Request Appeal - Applicant, Security Federal Savings 6 Loan Association. Security Federal has requested that this item be delayed to a later data; and by consensus of the Council, this item was tabled for the present time. 7. Opening and Review of Bids and Consideration of a Resolution Awarding the Sale of $860,000.00 General Obligation Improvement Bonds for Fire Hall Construction. 1 Mr. Ron Langneso of Springated. Inc., the City's Bonding Consultant, 1 was present at the Council meeting with six bide received on J the sale of $860,000.00 G.O. Bonds. The bide received were as follows: Not Interest Not Interest Syndicate [load Dollar Dost Rate Juran Moody $638,677.50 9.0721 t Allison Williams Co. $616,075.00 0.7510 i tat Minneapolis $619,385.00 8.7960 Norwaot $618,487.5 0 6.7853 a Cronin - Mdreotto 5615,470.n o 8.7424 Morrill Lynch $610,295.00 0.6609 i It was recommended by Mr. Langneno that the low bid from Merrill Lynch at a not interest rate of 8.6689 bo accepted. Motion woo made by sill Fair, seconded by Blonigon, and unanimously carried to adopt the resolution awarding the Bala of SBG0,000.00 in General Obligation Bonds to Morrill Lynch, Inc., at a not interest rato of 0.6669. Soo Resolution 1985 41. B. Consideration of Change Order No. 2 for Project 84-1, County Stats Aid Highway 075. Tho Initial contract with Buffalo Dituminouo for repaving County -- Road 75 called for a completion data of October 15, 1984. -2- 1._ Council Minutes -1/14/85 1 Since it was apparent that the work would not be completed by L this date, o stop order was issued to the contractor delaying paving of Broadway until spring of 1985. In order to amend the contract, a Change Order was prepared that provides for a completion date of June 15, 1985. Motion was made by Maxwell, seconded by Bill Fair, and unanimously carried to approve Change Order No. 2 with Buffalo Bituminous, Inc., on the 1984-1 Improvement Project. Consideration of a Conditional Use Request to Allow an Apartment Building to be Built in Excess of 12 Units - Applicant, Joseph G. Poehler b Associates. On December 10, 1984, the City Council unanimously adopted a motion granting preliminary approval for a proposed 24 -unit apartment house complex which would be financed by the Farmers Homo Administration and would be available for families with low and moderate incomes. The proposed location discussed at that time was property owned by Marvin George near Country Club Manor. At the January 8, 1985, Planning Commission meeting, the specific request for a conditional use to allow more than 12 units was presented by the developer, Joe Poehlar. Several property owners in the Country Club Manor Addition expressed opposition to the proposal; and as a result, the Planning Commission recommended denial of the conditional use permit and passed it on to the Council. Prior to the Council mooting, the developer, Mr. Poehlor, requested that his conditional use request be tabled until a future data to allow the owner of the property, Marvin George, to prepare his preliminary plat for replotting the Outlot A of Country Club Manor. After the platting is presented to the Planning Commiasion for review, Mr. Poohlor would than like to present his proposal after an exact lot is determined. It woo the consensus of the Council that thin conditional use request, along with thn preliminary replatting, should agotn be brought before the Planning Commission l'or additional public hearings. A brief diocunsion wan held by the Council concerning this matter in ragardn to conditional unu roqueals in general. It was dioeuosad that conditional uses are normally considered permitted uses within a zoning district, but conditions can be attached that may lesson the impact of n dovolopmont with the surrounding areas. Normally, it a duvalopor moots all of the conditions that are reasonable, a conditional use permit has to be granted if the proper zoning hes boon mat, etc. -3- Council Minutes - 1/14/85 0 10. Consideration of Conditional Use Request to Allow an Addition to be Built onto a Non -Conforming Building in a B-3 zone - Applicant, Danner Trucking. Mr. Bob Danner of Danner Trucking applied for a conditional use permit to build an addition to his present building along Highway 25 South. The addition was intended to be used to provide storage for items that were currently stored in his present building, thus freeing up space as that he could house his tractor trailers inside. It was noted by the Building Inspector that Mr. Danner started construction of the leanto addition without a building pormit or without a conditional use permit. It was also noted that since his current business is a non -conforming use in a B-3 zone, alterations which enlarge thin non -conforming use are not technically allowed under our current zoning ordinance. It was pointed out that one of the advantages of allowing this leanto storage addition would be that Mr. Danner could possibly clean up his property and eliminate items that are currently stored in the open. After further discusnion, motion was made by Bill Fair, seconded by Blonigon, and unanimously carried to grant the conditional use permit for the addition contingent upon Mr. Danner agree (� to clean up his property and remove all miscellaneous items stored outside other than trailers for his trucking business. �1 If Mr. Danner wan not agreeable to this compromise, the item would again be considered by the Council for possibly legal action to atop the building addition. 11. Consideration of Making Annual Appointments. Motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Maxwoll, and unanimously carried to adopt the following schedule of annual appointments as follows: Official Depositories: Wright County State Bank 1st National Bank of Monticello Security Federal Savings 6 Loan tat Bank of Minneapolis official Newspaper: Monticello Times Planning Commission: Jim Ridgeway Ed Schaffer Richard Carlson Joyce Dowling Richard Martlo r ' l HRR; Kan Msua Ito fill remainder of ,I Cochran's term) I Dud Schrupp -4- Council Minutes - 1/14/85 Joel Erickson L Library Board: warren Smith Parking Committee: Dennis Seitz Marn Flicker Bud Schrupp Other Jurisdictions: Community Education - Bill Fair Fire Board - Rick Wolfsteller OAA Arve Grimsmo Acting Mayor: Fran Fair Consulting Planner: Howard Dahlgron 6 Associates Auditor: Gruys Johnson 6 Associates Health Officer: Dr. Maus 12. Consideration of Renewing the Contract for Servieas with OSM. Mr. John Badalich, of the City's Consulting Engineering Firm of OSM, submitted to the Council the proposed adjustments their firm planato make to the annual contract for engineering services n with the City. The only chango being proposed is in the hourly rates for general engineering services. The schedule of changes results in an approximate increase of 51 over 19841s schedule. Councilman Blonigon felt that in the past too many change orders have occurred on projects engineered by OSM and felt that this related to the services being providad by the engineer. Mr. Badalich, of OSM, explained that change orders are a natural part of contracting and such items will always occur. After further discussion, motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Maxwell, to approve renewing the contract with OSM for engineering services for the City of Monticello for 1985. Voting in favor was Fran Fair, Bill Fair, Jack Maxwell, Arvo Grimamo. Voting in the opposition: Dan Blonigon. 13. Conaideration of Maintenance Agreement with Wriqht County for County State Aid Ilighwayn in Monticello. For many years now, the City of Monticello has each year entered Into an agreement with Wright County to maintain certain County State Aid Ilighwayn within the City limits. The County reimburses the City each year an amount based on Lho typos of maintenance _ the City does and based on tho number of road milso calculated by the County'a actual coat par mile for the previous year. Total County 8tato Aid Highways within the City limits that aro maintained by Monticello is 4.759 miles. The amount of -5- Council Minutes - 1/14/65 revenue received for this maintenance is approximately $4,000.00 - 55,000.00 annually. Motion was made.by Maxwell, seconded by Blonigen, and unanimously carried to approve entering into a maintenance agreement with Wright County for County State Aid Highways for 1985 as presented. 14. Consideration of Supporting the School's Request of Wright County for Traffic Control at the High School. Monticello School Board recently passed a resolution requesting that Wright County make three changes in the speed limits and signing along County Road 75 in front of the High School. In addition, they requested that the County install an overhead, double blinking amber light east of the Junior High School parking lot. The School District has requested City support in their efforts to make these changes and requested a letter from the City approving their request. Motion wag made by Fran Fair, seconded by Bill Fair, and unanimously carried to otter a letter of support for the School District'a request to Wright County for traffic sign changes, but noting that the City does not endorse any specific sign layout and design but would rather leave this up to traffic professionals for proper design. 15. Consideration of 1985 Sewer Rate Increase. J Public Works Director, John Simola, reviewed with the Council the proposed budget for 1965 for operating the WWTP. Mr. Simola noted that the City will need to raise 5255,250.00 for the operation and maintenance of the WWTP, with $234,800.00 needed from revenue of users. To arrive at this figure, Mr. Simola recommended a 3.2% increase in the sewer rates be adopted. This recommended rate increase would result in the residential users' rate going from $1.25 per hundred cubic foot to $1.29 par hundred cubic foot. Motion was made by Bill Fair, seconded by Maxwell, and unanimously carried to adopt the following rate schedule for sanitary cower usage affective January 1, 1985, as follows: Flow $0.688/100 cu.ft. ($8 minimum billing for tat 500 cu.ft.) BOD $0.095/pound TSS 50.185/pound Combined Rate $1.29/100 cu.ft. ($8 minimum billing for (Residential, lot 500 cu.ft.) Com-, 6 Inat. ) i i L _6- Council Minutes - 1/14/85 r-- 1 16. Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing Execution of an Agreement withControl Data Corporation and Other Minnesota Coalition of Outstate Citic6 on a Joint Comparable worth Study. As required by recently passed legislation, the City of Monticello will have to implement and establish an equitable compensation system for all its employees. In order for the City to comply with the new State Statutes, the City must perform in-depth evaluations of every position within the City and must submit a report to the Commissioner of Employee Relations by October 1, 1985. Basically, this means that the City must establish a numerical rating system that reflects on every task that an employee performs under the general guideline of their job description. Positions with similar total points by State Law should be receiving similar compensation within the City. The Coalition of Outotate Cities Organization, along with the Metropolitan Area Managers Association, felt that it would be more cost effective to engage an outside consultant to work with the group to prepare evaluations since so many city positions are similar from community to community. These groups have selected as their consultant the Control Data Corporation Business Advisors to perform the Individual job evaluations. The cost to the City of Monticello would be a $3,000.00 base fee plus n $25.00 per employee, resulting in approximately a $3,625.00 to the City. In light of the fact that the Comparable worth v Legislation is highly technical and extremely delicate with respect to avoiding potential litigation, it was recommended that the City join in with Control Data Corporation to perform those evaluations. Motion wan made by Maxwell, seconded by Fran Pair, and unanimously carried to adopt a resolution authorising execution of an agreement with Control Data Corporation on a joint comparable worth study. Soo Resolution 1985 02. 17. Conaiducatiun of Bills Cur the Month of December. Motion was made by 131onigon, seconded by Maxwell, and unanimously carried to approve tho hills for the month of December and January, 1985, as presented. �:�•-'� LUQ Rick Walfstol r Assistant Adm istrator -7- Council Agenda - 1/20/65 4. Consideration of a Proposal from Howard Dahlgren & Associates to do a Downtown Redevelopment Plan. (T.E.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Several months ago, Councilmember Fair and I met with representatives of a Downtown Committee who expressed substantial concern over the deterioration of the downtown. One of the first questions the merchants asked was whether or not the City could do something to make merchants take care of their property, store fronts, etc. The main concern was that the general appearance of the downtown was deteriorating and was not particularly inviting to shoppers. The merchants who attended that meeting stated that there were some merchants who put a great deal of time, money, and effort into maintaining the appearance of their property, only to have it detracted from by those stores who did little or nothing. At that meeting, I indicated that there was no true enforcement policy that the City could use to make store owners upgrade their property unless the property developed into a blight or a nuisance. Similarly, I indicated that the City clearly could not legislate taste as far as building design. What did coma out of that meeting was that there are some things that the City can do that can beautify the downtown and can serve as a catalyst for merchants to join the beautification. At that time I indicated we could look at new sidewalks, now landscape furniture and plantings, that we could look at new parking lot dosign,and finally, we could attempt to coordinate an effort with all retailers to beautify their own properties. At that same meeting I also indicated that the one financial incentive the City could conceivably utilize would be to issue low interest loans to merchants for the beautification. I stressed at that meeting that I would not guarantee ouch a loan program over happening. I simply stated that such a program is legal and if properly established, could be utilized. Whon we did the budget last fall, we put $10,000.00 into the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund for the express purpose of preparing a downtown rehabilitation study. John Uban, representing Howard Dahlgron & Associates, will be attending the Council mooting to make a proposal for doing that study. He will discuss the scope of what they will do and the estimated cost for the services. I wish to atreas the difference that Uban Is making a proposal to do a study, not a proposal to do the downtown. This Is vary similar to when we interviewed architects, except at this time we are interviewing only one firm for the purpose of doing the study. I have mot with John Uban and indicated the types of things we want the planners to look at and a potential time frame. I proaumo those matters will be included in his proposal. Similarly. I emphasized that early on there must be several Mc Council Agenda - 1/28/85 meetings with the retailers so that they will be an integral part of the entire downtown planning. I also emphasized to John that the major part of the study should focus on those things that the City can do to assist in the rehabilitation in the downtown, whether or not we have the cooperation of the retailers. There will be a section that will be aimed directly at the merchants and the potential they have for rehabilitating their buildings. The main thrust, however, will be aimed at municipal improvements as opposed to individual owner improvements. It is my understanding that John Uban will bring along the copies for your review. Again, this aspect and review will be very similar to our discussions with architects. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Based on the extent and scope of the proposal, authorize the execution of a contract with Howard Dahlgren for downtown planning services. 2. Deny the proposal and do not authorize contract execution - This action should occur if a finding is made that no downtown services are needed. Thin essentially would say that if the downtown needs rehabilitation, lot the merchants do it. 3. Based on the extent and scope of the proposal, amend the proposal to fit the budget - If the proposal comes in at substantially higher than the budgeted figuro, we may wish to pars the project down to suit our budgetary limitations. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that a combination of Alternatives 1 and 3 be used if necessary. I think it is essential that the City do initiate a downtown redevelopment study in light of the reconstruction of 75 and 25, the now bridge. Lhe now businesses having developed on Oakwood and the Library block, as well as the lose of a fav businesses in the downtown. Thorn is, likewise, a proposal to rehabilitate the old Ford building, and negotiations aro still underway to clear the property behind K 6 11 Auto. I think all of those elements would be pulled together in a uniform fashion under a master rehabilitation plan. I wish to also note that Maus Grocery is considering a larger facility and expand its site, and those concerns need also to be addressed. D. SUPPORTING DATA: I will submit copies of the proposal with the agenda if they arrive from Dahlgron in time. If not, John Uban will prooent those at the meeting. -2- Council Agenda - 1/28/85 5. Consideration of a Farmers Home Administration Financed Housing Proposal for Low and Moderate Income Families. (T.E.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: As I noted in your December 10 agenda supplement, the City has no standard policy for reacting to proposals for reduced assessment housing in the City. Consequently, the City Council must give their endorsement to each individual project as it is presented. Brad Larson, Jim Metcalf, and I believe Ken Barthel of Barthel Homes are proposing a 33 -unit low and moderate income housing development for Lot 5 in Lauring Hillside Terrace. As noted earlier, the assessed value on a Farmers Home Administration project is based on 208 of the estimated market value rather than the 288 which is used for conventional housing. Thus, the Council must grant its acceptance of a proposal that carries an assessed value less than other housing. Like the project that came before you in December, your approval is necessary for the application to be submitted to the federal government. Also, your approval at this time is not an approval of the project, only of the concept and of allowing a project with a reduced assessed value. The surveys taken by the current developers as well as the developer who was before you in December definitely indicate a need for Csafe, quality, affordable housing for low and moderato income people. I have only two concerns with thin project, neither of which need to be considered to be major issues. My first concern in granting approval to this group that has previously indicated they would be building elderly housing. That project, an you are aware, hoe not become a reality an yet. My other concern that ralates to this project exclusively concerns the site. I simply have some concern that by concentrating all of the low and moderato income family housing along Lauring Lana, we are gradually creating a modern ghetto. By modern ghetto, I simply moan a concentration of low and moderate income people or a pocket of poverty. Ghetto need not moan crumbling buildings and high crime rates. By concentrating all low and moderato income housing along this area, we onsontially take away the freedom of choice for low and moderato income people as to whore they can live. Granted, we cannot no scatter ovary low and moderato income housing project ouch that a family can choose any neighborhood in the City that they wish to live, but I think it would be an admirable goal for the City to encourage scattered site development rather than cluntoring all low income properties in a single neighborhood. I also wish to qualify this concern. We do not have an over abundance of low and moderato income and consequently have not generated a real pocket of poverty at this time. I bring thin subject up only as a caution that we begin watching so that such a trend does not occur. -3- Council Agenda - 1/28/85 C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: In order to address the number of low and moderate income families that do quality for housing of this type and who do, in fact, deserve safe, quality, affordable housing, staff recommends that an endorsement be granted to accept 33 unite of FmNA financed housing suited for low and moderate income families. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Map indicating the proposed location. -4- ,''� .P'_:U ��.�, i• +J` r.�;. .-1^M'�(.�! I C', ��+'_Intl-Y .',�(' '•�' §1 91.� 'i/t'*j�7�,(rr��%ter . i • , �[,`(�J y��� �.,.� .i• �T`i � � .�t�J.,. t tgJ�,l�` �, T,1 +J \ 1 �}� { 11� 7r •fit HIGHWAY d `r• • !%J ` .+ + NO. 84 t ,� lit OA '� � ` •O _---" , �� Gym � ,... I Vkot,'D jk� OM - pt PROPOSAL NO. 1 (WITHOUT GARAGES) iY Avb MdL.rr uu►-Ts ,obMOMOOM (Noc c7) 1 O,'�b'f"3++�iT: P't ,: Pi✓Ct �-Dac:r 3 3 'TGTA, L Z.Ey99L '9Q.PT.' 51DE`.W¢�.1� Laea � w i f Y-4 ID3 REAR ELEVATION, Council Agenda - 1/28/85 6. Consideration of Bingo License - Applicant, Knights of Columbus. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Knights of Columbus 06825 (Monticello -Big Lake) recently applied for an annual bingo license to operate every other Sunday night at the Monticello VFW Club. Recently passed state legislation has created the "Charitable Gambling Control Board" who will be the agency responsible for licensing all "gambling" activities effective 3/1/85. This change effectively eliminates all City licensing after 3/1/85 for all gambling such as bingo, pull tabs, raffles, tip boards, etc. The only control the City will have is to decide if gambling in general will be allowed within the City. As a result, it is suggested that this request by the Knights of Columbus be tabled until our next meeting where an agenda item will be presented discussing the now regulations and options available to the City. -5- Council Agenda - 1/28/85 7. Consideration of Supporting Monticello Township in their Opposition to a Turnback of a County Road. (T.E.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: While full maintenance responsibility for repair and snow removal, etc., has lain with the Township and City, that stretch of Orchard Road from County Road 75 to the intersection by the Flea Market is officially County road. It apparently was constructed at the time of the freeway construction and was given from the State to the County. The County, going along with the program it initiated approximately a year ago, wishes to turn back the section from the overpass to the intersection to the Township. when that turnback is complete, they will turn back the remaining section from County Road 75 to the overpass to the City. On Tuesday morning, January 29, the County Board is holding its hearing on this proposed turnback. Several days ago, Marge Goetzke, representing Monticello Township, came to see me to explain why the Township is opposed to such a turnback and to request the City's support in their opposition to that turnback. The Township's main concern lies with the reconstruction of the intersection down by the Flea Market. Because the Township already has full maintenance responsibility for the road, there is no now coat anticipated by virtue of the turnback with respect to maintenance. However, at the time a now intersection becomes f absolutely essential to accommodate the traffic going to the Flea Market, the full expense of that construction would lio on the shoulders of the Townahip. It is the Township's contention that by virtue of the volume of traffic, this stretch of road should remain within the County system, and the County should bear the responsibility to upgrade to accommodate that traffic load. It seems reasonable to state that the volume of traffic on that road warrants the County retaining responsibility for that stretch. I anticipate that a representative of the Township will be in attendance at the City Council meeting. AD I understand it, they primarily would like the Council to give them their support in their opposition. I think this can legitimately be done by a motion or perhaps even a conaonouo. In addition, the Council may wish to direct that a letter of support be draftod so that the Township official could carry that latter to the County Board mooting. I will be unable to attend the County Board mooting because I am already committed to the League of Minnesota Cltioa Logialativo Action Conference, which begins Tuesday morning. You may wish to consider, in lieu of a letter, appointing some other City ropr000ntativo to attend the County Board mooting. -8- Council Agenda - 1/28/85 l B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Lend support to the Township's opposition. 2. withhold support from the Township's opposition. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Having discussed the matter with John Simola and other staff members, we feel that it is appropriate to support the Township in their opposition. Clearly, the volume of traffic on this road does warrant County consideration. Likewise, there has been substantial discussion about the Flea Market eventually being annexed and being upgraded. If this is the case, then the streets in the area will become City streets. Before any turnback should be allowed, the upgrading by the County should be done and should be done to a level that would be acceptable to City standards. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the map showing the stretch of road in question. -7- Council Agenda - 1/28/85 7. ADDENDUM. (T. E.) After the conclusion of the preceding part of the supplement, I received a telephone call from the Wright County Highway Engineer's office informing me that the County Board would be considering the revocation of that segment of the County Road lying between 75 and the overpass. They intend to turn back this section of road to the City at the same time they turn the other leg of the road back to the Township. I did inform them over the phone that as far as I knew, we would be opposing the turnback unless the intersection was brought up to a standard that could handle the volume of traffic. John Simola has agreed to represent the City at the County Board meeting to discuss this matter. Again, as mentioned in the earlier part of the supplement, the maintenance of this stretch of road is not so much a problem as is the reconstruction of the intersection. While this stretch of road does not legitimately serve County purposes, it does strike me that the County is seeking to simply wash their hands of this matter and quick get out of any involvement before reconstruction and substantial expenditures become necessary. I still think that we should oppose this revocation until the reconstruction is completed. One final note: We cannot stop the revocation of the street, but perhaps we can bring enough pressure on the County Board members for them to capitulate to our wishes. -e- 46 =I- f Council Agenda - 1/28/85 8. Consideration of Developing Softball Fields. (J.S.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: In 1984, the City Council indicated they would be willing to work with the Monticello Softball Association in assisting them with developing the ballfields on the NSP property near Montissippi Park. The softball fields are in such very poor condition that the league has been losing teams over the past few years. It was felt that if the fields were properly upgraded and well maintained that the Monticello Softball Association would be able to attract more teams to this area. An amount of $3,500.00 was placed into the 1985 Budget in hopes to upgrade the well and fields at the existing site. The above costs were based upon the assumption that the existing 4 -inch wall could be developed to a point where we could simply add a larger pump to got the required amount of water. In late October of 1984, we hired McAlpine Rrothers, Inc., out of Rogers. Minnesota, to test the well at an approximate cost of $150.00. This firm tested the existing 4 -inch well and found that the maximum capacity of this well would be 15-20 gallons per minute. This is substantially lose than that required to water both of the fields adequately. McAlpine Brothers, Inc., gave us an estimate for a now wall of $2,250.00. This does not include the coat of their developing the wall at $90 par hour. McAlpine Brothers' estimate for the installation of a largo capacity pump with piping, excluding any service connection, is $2,860.00. This gives us a total coot of $5,110.00. There could be considerable savings with going with a smaller pump. However, by the time we add the now wiring costo and possibly pressure tank costo, we're going to be back up in this area of, say, $4,500.00-55,000.00. This is more than the total developmental cost that we have included into the 1985 Budget and does not oven begin to address any other upgrading or routine maintenance of the fields. The following are a tabulation of some of the costs that we would expect to soo with development of the NSP ballfiolde. Upgrading wall S 5,110.00 Piping for minimal all - above ground sprinkler system S 350.00 Limo 6 Black Dirt S 800.00 Electricity S 70.00 Toilet Rental S 600.00 Yearly Maintenance 5 500.00 (materials) Yearly Maintenance (labor) S 1,450.00 Garbage Collection S 250.00 Total tot Year Coote S 9,130.00 -9- Council Agenda - 1/28/85 Some of the long-range costs in developing the ballfields could be such items as listed below. On-site Sewage Septic Tank System $ 3,000.00 Restrooms/Concession Stands $15,000.00+ Lighting $ 7,500.00+ As can be seen by the above estimated expenses, the cost of developing ballfields can be expensive. There are some drawbacks that should be considered to developing the NSP softball fields. We have been unable to obtain any long-range commitment from NSP. We have only their verbal commitment that they foresee no need for the property in the immediate future. This could change very quickly through some requirement of NSP or the Nuclear Regulatory Agency. It would be risky business to spend thousands and thousands of dollars on property which the City has no legal control over. If the Council is interested in developing ballfields, it appears to be more advantageous to do that development on property which is controlled by the City. Ono such area already planned for the development of ballfields is Outlet A in the Meadow Oak Subdivision lying between Interstate 94 and Meadow Oak Avenue. This property is not currently dedicated park land. However, one of the conditions with the davolopment to that this piece of property be dedicated park land as the development of the Meadow Oak properties continue. There was also some discussion that the developer would be responsible for the cost of construction of the park. It may be to his advantage to dedicate this as park earlier if the City would do the development. Certainly the development of this property as park land and ballfiolds would give more axpoaura to his property and possibly speed the development process along. There to easily room enough in the Meadow Oak property for the construction of two ballfields. Thera to already existing largo diameter water service to the property and eanitary sewer service. By roforring to the above tabulation, it to easily soon that there could ba an immediate savings of $7,000.00 or $8,000.00 because th000 utilities aro in. Development of those fields could tako place during 1985, and the existing fencing at tho NSP fioldo could be moved lata in 1985 or early 1986. The fields would than be ready for first play in 1986. One drawback to thio particular site, however, is that there is not sufficient room to construct the ultimate four field ballpark, which may or may not be needed within tho next tan years or no. The following is a tabulation of oomo oxpoctod development coats of two fields at tho Meadow Oak sito. _10- Council Agenda - 1/28/85 Leveling Black Dirt, Lime, Seed, and Sod S 1,200.00 Labor $ 2,000.00 Relocate Fence $ 1,500.00 Parking (gravel surface) S 500.00 Extend Sewer and Water Service to Field Area S 600.00 Below Ground Sprinkler System (material) $ 2,135.00 (labor) $ 1,200.00 Total $ 9,135.00 Again, some of the other costs at the NSP ballfield would be also included here. These would be such costs as the $600.00 per year for the portable restroom rental, garbage pickup, etc. If a concession stand and restroom were built in this area, we would expect the cost to be in the area of $15,000.00 or more, same as previously mentioned. In addition, the lighting system could easily exceed $7,500.00. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. This alternative would be to leave things pretty much as they are and do only the mowing that we have done at the parka in the past, leaving the responsibility totally to the Monticello Sottball Association. 2. This alternative would be to develop the NSP ballfioldo as planned, upgrading the wall, etc. 3. This alternative would be to only do a minimal amount of upgrading at the NSP ballfiolds and possibly take over tho caro and maintonanco of the fioldo, full well realizing that the fields may still be substandard. e. This alternative would be to find another location for the ballfields on property which the City hoo full control over and slowly, over a period of time, develop high quality ballfiolds and amenities to attract now toame to Monticello and keep the existing teams hare. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Although the staff has no firm recommendation and loavoe the docloion to the City Council, we would suggest that if ballfiolds are developed that they be dovolopod to a point whore they are maintained in oxcollont condition and arc an attraction to Monticello, rather than an eyosoro or nuisanco. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Provioue latter from Monticello Softball Association. TO: THE 14ONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL °ROM: THE MONTICELLO SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION Please find enclosed a proposal for some help from the City of Monticello in maintaining th, softball flolds. In the past the city has been some help on different expenses that the softball assoc. has had. At the present, the softball fields are in very poor conditions al the league has just started these past few years, losing teams to other leagues. And as citizens of Monticello we have always had pride in the facilities that the City of Monticell has had. The reasons for the difficulties the league has had, the reasons why some of the teams are leaving this league, and what some of the other leagues are doing to maintain good fields are explained In a short outline that follows. The softball fields are used in most cases by the league. But you will also find that other people are involved out there. The necessary improvements needed will not benefit just the softball league. The following is a proposal that the league would like to present to the city: 1. That the city maintain and bring up to good or excellent standards, the softball fields. This being with the help of the a" well that is on the property. 2. That in the future years the city be involved with there Quality equipment and peopl In keeping the fields in excellent shape. 1. That the city maintain the costs of the satellites and dumping in which they have done in the past. 4. That the city maintais the costs of regular garbage dumping which is needed from year to year. S. That the costs of all above be born on an equal Mels between the city and the soft- ball association. Knowing that for the first few years that the city may not re- ceive enough funding from the association, but that the balance of the future years the amount received from the association may more than cover the costs to. the city, some thought must be retained on how that would be handled in the future. We hope to have most of the questions you may have, answered in the outline of with out presence at the neat meeting. Thank you very much for your time. Cary L. Reitan President Kenneth Kalway SkellfW a3sk-1 Creg Rask Vice President Mike Offerdshl Secretary 0 WORK `NEEDED ON THVF E LDS FIELD NI 1. 'Thts'•summer' e, "regulat fertilising as deemed necessary. b: eegular mowing of fields with city to be notified. e: regular watering to be done as per the• above necessities.. 2: This fell a. black dirt to be hauled in to make fields smoother, especially right field. b: seeding where necIessaty espeetally:in the outfields. e'. fall fei`t,il'iiing. 3. Future years a. regular fertilising as deemed necessary. b. fence repair all around. 1. E!s les. 2. tightehon fence., 3—tepitr-_gates. FIELD p2 1: 'Tlile'eummer � _ s. 'regul`ar fertilising ae-neeeaeeiy.• b 'regular nio-Ing of [told. er .regulit, watoting: u _ d • _. 2-.; fTAls:fall, 7;-. !black 'dile-toibc'KiuledIii, :6,mak o, 4ldIAe'amooihet_,;aepeeisIIY,jn,putflold.'orce. b:; se6aI -- ':ae ne'eaeo__oty`c'' ­ - " ' C. fall 'ferctltiing. 3.r..- Fututa years o., ,regul"at fortilIaihg. -_ ?b., minorfenee and' gato repair t � r OTHER,'AREAS', ; 1,. The driveway around the fields needs sometype of 'fill to allminato the potholes that s;'so bad. Thls has, bean attempted sItoady thin year by the league. Other work already done by *11eague was fill brought in to lengthen the bases and lime brought in to kill the gross of ex. tided infield. J (2) -- - - I FINANCIAL HISTORY OF THE LEAGUE A. 1979 -----Net loss of $24.55 1 I. Expenses a. Umpire fees paid $2276.75 b. Softballs $426.57 c. Concession expenses $1558.59 d. misc. (bases, sanction fees, beer license, satellites etc) $945.00 e. Total expcndatures $5206.91 2. Income a. League entry fees, tournament, billboards, concessions. b. Total $5182.36 3. Note --the city covered the dram shop ins. for the above year. B. 1980 -----Net profit of $1,247.83 1. Expenses a. concession expenses $3173.22 b. softballs $381.46 c. well repair $305.87 d. garbage pickup $218.75 e. Olson and Sons Electric (1978 repairs--) $642.82 I. Misc. expenses (beat lic., sanction fees, billboards etc) $826.65 q. Total ' $5548 . 77 ( 2. Income a. Entry fees, tournament, billboards, concessions, etc. $6.796.60 3. Note, city paid Dram shop Ins. C. 1981 -------Nat profit of $1138.43 1. Expenses a. Concessions $2343.59 b. Dram shop Ins. $912.00 c. Bases $328.91 d. softballs $510.14 e. Misc. $682.87 f. Well repair (pressure tank) $191.10 g. Gas (for hauling aouipment for black dirt on fields) $295.20 h. Crass soed and field mantanance $505.21 I. Garbage pick up $125.00 J. Total $5994.02 2. Income a. Entry fees, tournament, billboards, concessions b. Total $7132.45 D. 1982 -----Net profit of $83.67 1. Expenses a. softballs $577.15 b. garbage $225.00 c. Misc. $275.18 d. Trophies $209.00 e. Sanction fees $580.00 g 1. Total $1666.33 (3) 2. Income a. Entry fees, Billboards b. Total $1750.00 +++oea+ In 1982 only 1 field was used because of the seeding that had taken place the year bL_) Because of only I field we held no league tournament and did not open concession stand because of reduced nightly attendance. E. 1983 ---Net Loss of $633.70 1. Expenditures a. umpire sanctioning $300.00 b. Paint supplies $171.77 c. Trophies (tournament and League) $305.86 d. Misc. $658.32 a. Garbage $220.00 f. softballs $1310.58 g. league sanction and tournaments $523.50 h. concession supplies ' $999.28 i. Total $4489.31 2. Income a. entry fees and tournament b. Total $3855.61 tr+++•O. 1n 1983 the Monticello J.C.'a took over the concession stand and ran it for the year wi a profit to them of approx. $1200-1400 with no, return to the league, but the monies pu to good use by the JC's. WHAT OTHER LEAGUES ARE DOING A. Buffalo l.caguc 1. Maintained by the city 2. $250 entry fee from cacti team goes to the city for maintenance and the city pays for the costs of umpiring. 3. If they get at least 10 teams this year the entry per team will be $200. 4. The city or league gets the concessions B. Montrose League I. All team fees go to the Montrose Softball Inc. of three men who take care of the fields themselves 2. They also run the concessons. C. Rockford League I. League maintains new league formed 2. One time loan to League of $10,000. to be paid back to the city, time unknown. 3'. ,They run and collect from their own concession stand D. Big Lake League 1. Property owned by school 2. Malntanined by the school 3. Expenses to the league unknown at this time. CE. Annandale League I. City collects $275-$300 from each team for maintenance 2. Has lights and fields expenses paid by city 3. City out of League fee pays for umpires 4. Pays city extra $50.00 for cost to run tournament for lights 5. No concessions 6. Due to POOL payments to city the city was currently running ahead in payments made league, until the city dust installed now lights. F. Elk River League 1. City owns fields and maintains 2. League fee goes to city (approx.$290) 3. League has lights. 4. Unk what else. G. Becker League 1. Unk what happens but the land we believe belong& to the Legion club who operates tl concession stand. IN TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Administration YEAR END/YEAR BEGINNING The year just ended, 1984, was a very busy year, but the business conducted was largely establishing a posture for upcoming years. Planning and coordinating, preparing for eventual implementation were where a majority of staff effort was concentrated. Clearly, the activity in the Building Department was heavy, and Gary will respond to that area. In the area of public works, we saw the issue of raised channelization in the downtown resolved, largely through the efforts of Howard Dahlgren. With that stumbling block removed, MN/DOT is ,proceeding with the design of the new bridge and T.H. 25. Related to that, the City knowing it would lose part of East Bridge Park opened and closed negotiations on the Saxon property. We took advantage of an opportunity and will be well prepared when reconstruction begins. Also related to T.H. 25 reconstruction is the installation of interim traffic signals at T.H. 25 and Oakwood Drive. Having long been a sensitive issue, the solution slowly moved through the various bureaucratic channels to a point where we see those lights becoming operable. Last year we planned, this year we act. In lata summer, we began in earnest preparing for the now Fire Hall. After review and interview of several architectural firms, the City engaged TKDA to do the job. The Committoo mot several times, and, while our differences were substantial in the beginning, we stayed with our task until we agrood on a concept that suited everyone, including the voters. We faced obstacles related to Biting. We overcame them, and the Fire Hall will go up in 1985. Almost all of 1984 was dedicated to establishing a franchise for cable communications. A long and complex process with many special interests, the SWC4 worked hard at acquiring the beat possible system to servo our areas. We think wo got it. The system will be activated in Monticello in 1985. Although the City played only a minor role, we saw the Hospital District develop and proceed with plane on the Nuroing Homo. In a good example of planning and cooperation, we oaw the Hospital and City work togothor to resolve a oito difficulty, the result of which made both parties winners. Now in 1985, we see construction underway. It has evolved into one of the more time consuming and complex tasks we've ever taken on, but the revision of the Comprehensive Plan was completed, and the Zoning Ordinance is under review. My original time estimates were off by quite a bit. I do not, however, want to compromise the document to meet deadlines. We have a good plan and good ordinance with which we do well. Our goal is to improve it, to address now concerns, but we needn't be in a hurry. Planning and zoning is the one area where the maxim "If it ain't broke, dont fix it" doesn't necessarily apply. Land use planning is in a constant state of flux and needs to be under constant review. Other major planning efforts began in 1984 and will carry over into 1985. At budget time, the Council made a commitment to several goals. A levy for 5100,000.00 was instituted to establish a fund for the interceptor sewer. Dollars were committed to a new water study. Money was set aside for a Downtown Revitalization Study. Staff efforts went into preparing for computer needs. Discussions began with respect to identifying individual parcels needed for the collector street extension. A proposal was made to and accepted by the Malonee for one section of that street. In 1984, the NRA acquired Lots 5 and 6, Block 3 in Oakwood in anticipation of IxI's expansion. Not all of 1984 was planning. We saw the reconstruction of ( Hart and Cedar and the beginning of County Road 39 resurfacing. The City rocoivod a UDAG in the amount of $243,500.00 which was then channeled to Fulfillment Systema to supplement their IRB's and Tax Increment Financing. That now structure is already occupied. IxI built four more buildings and bought Lot 6 from the HRA, preparing for their expansion. Punch card voting was implomented in 1984 to mixed roviowa. I think experience will eliminate the confusion. Certainly the economic recovery gsnarated activity. Par Woet was completed, 100% by the dovoloper. Two now restaurants were built. A now office building, utilizing TIF,opened for business. A now bank oponod, an 9 6 L began construction. In tho downtown, wo lost coma businaasea, but we also gainod coma. In coaanco, 1984 has boon active. Wo aro propared for 1985. For tho year 1985. I hope to achieve certain goalo, some of which arc tontativa, coma aro moraly matter of fact. As a matter of fact we will coo cable communications complotod and activated. Barring unforeseen circumotancos, we will complete and occupy our now Firo Hall. Through the nocoosity of Piro flail construction, we will coo ono potrolcum bulk plant rolocato. I havo a goal of cooing all bulk plants relocated out of the commercial area to a more suitable zona. ` -2- In the realm of personnel, we must complete our comparable worth study. I also have goals of completing a new personnel policy and a new employee performance evaluation system. Both the policy and the evaluation system are under development at this time. In 1985, we will complete the Zoning Ordinance revision. As new provisions and zones are developed, I anticipate new growth alternatives, new housing concepts, and conversions of vacant land to occupied land. New areas and projects will generate new interest. We cannot, however, forget our existing facilities. Expansion, renovation, and rehabilitation of the Central Business District should be considered. A plan of action and development shall be proposed and presented to our merchants. We will attempt to unify the City's commercial interests under a single goal. Stimulating the commercial areas of the City will not detract from our ongoing industrial development efforts. It is my goal to see the creation of 100 new jobs in 1985. With respect to City services, my goal is to make the actual computer conversion in 1985. While such a conversion is not intended to eliminate personnel, it is meant to increase the efficiency and the capability of rendering service. Having started in 1984. I want the City to complete the acquisition of right-of-way for all of the Lauring Lane collector system. We may not construct any roadway, but I hope to have the platted street established. Also related to public works, we will see the completion of a now water study. Based on the findings of that study, my goal is to sec the City begin to implement the upgrading of the system, including the attendant annexation if nocoosary. Laotly, and this goal comae without any figures before me. I want to hold the 1986 Budget at the same level as the 1985 Budget. I realize that we are only three weeks into this year's budget, but I am already setting my sights on the process and the result. Bolding the line will be a determining factor. This then is how I visualize the past year and the upcoming year. I hope that as Council direction helps formulate other goals, we will continue to press for one major goal, to wit, the continued quality of service and government in Monticello. -3- DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORT Wastewater Treatment Plant and Collection System (J.S.) 1984 saw the final acceptance of the WWTP project. With the exception of one test in December, the WWTP has been meeting its limitations. 1984, however, was not without problems at the WWTP. This year saw the replacement of the air compressors and the air dryer at the WWTP, and problems with the ballast in both the second stage digester and the sludge storage tank. In addition, we found that odor problems still persisted at the WWTP. In addition, the Variable Speed Drive unit at the main lift pumps was inoperable for much of 1984. 1985 will see the corrections of all of the problems encountered in 1984. We will continue to work on the odor control problem at the WWTP. 1985 will see some attention to our collection system. A portion of the interceptor sever will be built under Highway 25 and Cedar Street. Plane and specifications, which were ordered along with Hart and Cedar, should be ready for your review within the next month or so. We will begin doing some work on the old trunk line through the Bondhus property. L Significant leakage was found in this area during a routine investigation in 1984. 1985 will sea us address come of the root growth in our main sower lines through the use of now technology. It will oloo be a year of repair on utilities and manholoo on Broadway and Highway 25 in readiness for the projects forthcoming. Water Department (J.S.) 1984 saw the addition to both pump houaee in the downtown area. We added a standby power angina to wall No. 2 for those periods when we were without electricity in the downtown area. We uncovered coma significant pitting and datorioration in the existing water tower, which will have to be addressed in 1985. 1984 also saw the addition of a drain to our water reservoir. 1985 to to be a year in which our water system to addressed through the completion of a now updated water study. We expect to make the necessary repairs to the oxiating water Lover and clean the reservoir. wall No. 1 is duo to have the deep wall turbine pump pulled for inspection and the necessary repairs made. This year will also ace the updating of our alarm system for water and the addition of coma locating equipment for locating lines and pipes when we have insufficient or incorrect data. 1985 will ace the replacement of at least one main water valva on Broadway and a thorough investigation of all the water ayetam on Highway 25 prior to that project,a beginning in 1986. Parks W .S.) 1984 saw the beginning of the Par West Health Course theme park. Much of this project is completed. West Bridge Park was given somewhat of a facelift with a new roof over the existing warming house and a now Hex picnic shelter built with the cooperation of the City and the Lions Club. 1984 saw our continued effort toward planting trees. Country Club Park received several. In this year the Hillcrest playground structure was replaced, and the Fourth Street playground structure was removed due to its deteriorated condition. 1985 will see the further development of the Country Club Park and the completion of the Par West Health Course theme park, along with the installation of some minor playground equipment such as a sand box. More trees will be planted in all of the parks, and work is expected to begin in the ballfields. 1985 will see the City either adding an additional tractor mower or contracting out some of the grass mowing. Streets and Alleys (J.S.) 1984 saw the addition of more streets to the City of Monticello. With the completion of the Par West project, the addition of the Meadow Oak project, and the start of the extension of Sandberg Road, there are more miles of streets now in Monticello than over before. In addition to those projects, we saw the rebuilding of Hart and Codar Streets to modern, updated thoroughfares. In 1984 the City of Monticello switched to a granite typo of chip aaalcoat rather than the round poa rock. We replaced one of the pickups in the Strout Department along with a paint striper for street work. We saw the addition to the staff in the Streets and Alloys as wall as the Parka. 1985 will sou the completion of the Broadway reconstruction project and the design of the Highway 25 project. Soalcoating is expected to resume to a full -sired project, and one of the old snowplow trucks will be replaced. Shop and Garage W .S.) 1984 now the addition to the equipment at the Shop and Garage. A largo grinder woo added. along with an AC -DC weldor and hydraulic press. In 1984, City staff insulated two atalla in their now polo barn and installed natural gas host. Two door operators were installed in the polo barn as wall. 1985 will sou painting of the existing masonry Maintenance Building and two more door operators added to the polo barn. -2- Tree Program (J.S.) 1984 saw the tagging of 68 Dutch Elm Diseased trees in the City of Monticello. Of these 68 trees, 17 trees have been cut or will be cut by the City of Monticello. A 1985 estimate is 65-75 trees will contact Dutch Elm Disease. Miscellaneous O.S. ) 1984 saw the passing of the Employee Right to Know Act. The City of Monticello is currently involved in the training of employees in connection with hazardous materials which they may come in contact with. we are also working toward the completion of the Property Management Program for the City of Monticello. Both of these projects should be complete in 1985. c C' DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORT Economic Development, 1984 (A. P.) My position as Director of Economic Development has enabled me to work with the Chamber of Commerce, the Industrial Development Committee, the HRA, and the City of Monticello. The last 12 months have been both challenging and rewarding. The following are some of 1984'8 accomplishments. I have completed a business directory for all Monticello businesses. Information obtained included name of each business, contact person, addresses, telephone numbers, and number of employees. This information is matched with past employment history and indicates increases/decreases in the work force. Significant increases were seen in 1984. Self-employed individuals increased by 19.2%, the professional service oriented firms increased by 8.4%, the retail firma increased by 12.6%, commercial by 5.7%, and industry by 27.9%. Many activities that I am involved in aro somewhat related to the construction or addition of now buildings, atc. Thin has boon adequately covered by Cary Anderson's report in the January 3, 1985, edition of the Monticello Times. Two major projects completed in 1984 were the construction of four now buildings at IXI and the expansion of FSI to their now home on Lauring Lane. Administering FSI's U.D.A.C. funds has boon completed. A tremendous amount of time and work want into the application process, entering the grant agreement, compiling and submitting the Legally Binding Commitments to H.U.D., rocoiving the Lotter of Credit, and paying out the $243,500.00 of grant funds. Other areas of responsibility during tho pact year included bacoming Diractor/Socratory of the Houoing and Rodovolopmant Authority. Although the HRA predominantly dealt with industrial activity and Tax Increment Financing (TIF) in particular, they did deal with housing to coma degree. A firm stand was taken by the HRA not to change tho TIF boundaries and to not allow housing projects to utilize TIF. Economic Davolopment, 1985 (A.P.) 1984 wan a tremendous year, and 1985 looks to be as good or better. Some activities that were initiated in 1984 were not completed but will culminate in 1985. For example, the HRA actively pursued redeveloping the old Ford Ccraga, and Ito tenants came forth with a plan to bring the building up to coda and remodel it inside and outside. The HRA also actively sought to redevelop the property owned by Mr. and Mrs. Haas. Progress has been made but a lot needs to be done for redeveloping it. These are two of the HRA's main concerns for 1985. Other projects started in 1984 that are to be completed in 1985 are: The Metcalf 6 Larson Elderly Housing Project is expected to begin in the spring; Key Tool 6 Plastics is also planning to begin construction of their new 23,000 sq. ft. building in the spring. I am currently working with several firms who are considering expansion and/or relocation. For reasons of confidentiality, the firms cannot be mentioned at this point. Along with the present prospective firms, I have initiated a business contact program that will enable me to actively see 2-3 decision makers per week through 1985. Some of this activity will result in now industry for Monticello. This activity, along with my other Chamber, HRA, Industrial and Development Committee, and City activities, will result in a successful 1985. One project for 1985 will benefit all five unite above. We are investigating the possibility of a City of Monticello magazine that can be used as a multi-purpose brochure, etc. -2- DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORT Building Inspection (G.A.) The majority of the Building Inspection report was in the article printed in the January 3 edition of the Monticello Times. I-11 just give you a brief recap of it as follows. We had a total of 191 permits issued, with a total dollar valuation of $7,581,746.00. The total amount of money brought in in net building permit and plan review fees was $42,399.78. Total State surcharge fees collected was $3,807.90. We had 30 single family houses built this year, with one duplex, and 3 multiple family housing unite consisting of two 24 -unit apartment buildings and one 8 -unit townhouse building. We also had 16 new commercial buildings and 4 new industrial buildings, with 17 new garages built this year. Over the last 10 -year period, this is the highest total valuation of building permits issued in the City of Monticello. Previous high was when the Monticello Nuclear Plant was built. With the current market and economic conditions, we look for the total building permit valuation and the total number of permits toincrease over the previous high totals exceeded in 1984. Poo aiblo expectations are being over $35 million in now construction by the tat of Juno. With the increased communication and another year behind us, good public relations, and the building contractors in this area, we look forward to a smooth, more efficient run inspection schedule for 1985. With incroasod building activity, we look for no additional increase to this Dopartmont-a staff. Planning and Zoning (G.A.) Zoning activity over the pant year has increased significantly to reflect the increased building activity. With the existing ordinance as is, we have aeon many changes which need to take place and more clarity within our Zoning Ordinance. We had a lot of activity at Planning Commission level, sometimes very controversial and hectic; but overall. I think we had a very good year an a Planning Commission. We had some controvaraice between staff and Planning Commission, and also between Planning Commission and Council at different times throughout the year. We think we would like to open up more communicationo amongst City staff, Planning Commission members, and City Council mombors to try and create a more open typo policy. For 1985, we look for completion of the Comprehensive Plan, which was started in late April of 1984. With the implementation of a now Comprehensive Plan, we hope to have a more explicit, more meaningful Zoning Ordinance which the everyday person can pick up and read and be able to understand the intent of the ordinance as adopted. The new ordinance section of the Comprehensive Plan will by no means be acceptable to everybody's favor, but the intent of it is to more clearly define each and every section of the ordinance for interpretation. The Planning Commission has taken a new perspective as far as any matters brought to their Planning Commission. They have met with City Council members and also with City staff and would like to go with the concept of a more slow, meaningful, more productive approach to the development of the City. They will no longer, under any circumstances, accept anything before them for public hearing or otherwise until it has been completely reviewed by City staff, Consulting Engineer, and Consulting Planner before coming before them so the product that does come before them is completely ready for their approval or denial. Overall, we would like to establish, as City staff, a more open type policy between Commission members, City Council, and City staff. If we have any problems or any comments on any particular Planning Commission or City Council decision that we air our comments openly amongst the three bodies involved and not hide things and bring them up at a later time. With the proposed increase in building activity for 1985, we also look for increased proposed requests coming before the Planning Commisoion. Assessment (C.A.) With the incr0000d building activity, 1986 showed an increase in now construction valuation for the City. We olo o have seen within the valuations of property a lot more rosidantlal properties put on the market for sale, not necessarily because of the necessity to coil proportion, but also people jumping into the market and exploring the possibilioe of marketing their property. Porcontags-wiao for the 1984 ansesomont, we are running about 931 of the sale price of the houses calling in residential, and commercial were at about 896. Of the few sales that we have, the value on the commorcial property is at 89% of what they sold for. For the 1985 assessment, we aro looking at bringing our land valuoo up and reducing our house values for vary little incroaao, if any, some increase in soma areas and soma docroa son in other areas of residential properties. In commercial proportion, we are rocoiving come inclination from the State that they would like to do an overall ro-acc000mont of commorcial proportion. We aro acknowledging that come, if not quite a few, proportion aro low; bnt the policy of the County Aeaessor is to remain at the lovol which he has indicated the properties to be valued at, and he is pretty much waiting to sea what the State would like to have Wright County do, pretty much playing tho "wait and coal' game. If commercial properties have to be increased. Cpretty much lot the State put an overall increase on commercial -2- properties, which isn't the fair approach either when some properties �_• are up to their level of assessment and other properties are low. They should be just dealing with the properties that are low. But that's not the intent of the State. Overall, our assessment is right up with the State requirements as far as percentage of the ratio of sale price to actual estimated market value. Civil Defense (G.A.) Last year at about this time, we were gearing up for possible flooding with the closing of the Monticello Nuclear Plant. With the supplies purchased and very little flooding, if any, occurring, the supplies are remaining on hand as needed. We did, however, have one nuclear disaster exercise as required by the State of Minnesota, which is very much incidental to the real exercise which usually occurs. With very little severe weather or any disaster really relating from adverse weather conditions, it was a relatively quiet year for Civil Defense. For 1985, with the Nuclear Plant being up and running at full capacity by this week's end, we aro seeing the river channel opening up and the ice breaking up along with it. Therefore, we aro not foreseeing any real flooding occurring yet this late winter or early in the spring. Unless we have a vary significant amount of snowfall between now and early spring, we should see very little, if any, possibility of flooding occurring again within the City limits of Monticello. We do have a nuclear disaster exercise planned as required by the federal government for somotima in the summer of 1985. With no details on it yet, we are planning for some typo of physical involvement within thin exorcise compared to the sit-down in EOC Headquarters activity as the fall exercise was. Without any severe weather and any dioastars related from that, we look forward to another fairly quiet year in Civil Dofonoo. City Hall Maintenance (G.A.) 1984 saw the installation of our now heating exchanger in our heating and cooling system; and othor than periodic maintenance and small parte, we did sea our City Hall mechanical systems go on to d preventive maintenance schedule system. Within the scheduled maintenance system, tho currant maintenance contractor, Comfort Craft of St. Cloud, has just rocantly referred us on to McDowell Company, also of St. Cloud, to carry on with any omorgency situations until a now service contract bo lot out in late February, early March, for bids. Comfort Craft loot their main man that took caro of mechanical maintenance of our system harp in Monticello and the owner of the company suggested that we go with the main paront company of his company, McDowall Company, to carry out any emergency situation and be available to submit a bid for preventive -3- maintenance work for the 1985 year. Other than minor leaks to our roof system, we did see the exterior bricks of the City Hall building sealed for 1984 and put on a scheduled maintenance of resealing of the brick every 5-7, maybe even 10 years, on down the road. For 1985, we look forward to a new scheduled maintenance contract with a different company, putting it up for bids late February, early March. Also, we have budgeted for replacement of the roof shingles on the City Hall building and looking for possible consultation with a specialist in the field of roof systems. We will consult with him for a specified fee for information in regards to a complete reroofing system or going over the existing roof system we have to achieve the beet possible results, short term and long term, for this building. Also, one thing to look at which was not budgeted at budget time was for the resealing of the existing beams and decking on the interior of our City Hall building. I feel very strongly that this should be done sometime during the summer months of 1985. with the scheduled maintenance on the mechanical system, the new roof being installed on the building, the bricks being sealed on the exterior of our building, the possibility of the interior roof beams and decking being resealed, other than minor maintenance situations which might occur, we feel that the current City Hall building is back onto a scheduled type of maintenance within the building as a whole. -4- DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORT Senior Citizen Center (K.H.) As Director of the Senior Citizens Center, I have complete responsibility for all planning and coordinating of a large variety of programs, services, and activities, both at the Center and in community involvement. This portion of my job is comparable to a program director job classification. In addition to the areas covered under program director, I am also hostess, responsible for all purchases for lunches and dinners, maintenance, woodworking, rug making, ceramics, classes and services. I personally serve on community organizations, representing the Center or see that a Senior representative is present. I do a lot of information and referral. Counseling of all kinds is a frequent demand on my time. Over the years I have built up enough rapport with the Seniors that I am often called to attend them when they are ill, on/off duty hours. This has included going in the ambulance, or personally taking them to the doctor or hospital. Writing grants for moniea to enhance the Cantor is very time consuming, as well as heading all fund raisere. I attend as many meetings and conferences as possible, so I am constantly learning and getting now ideas. I teach many of the classes offered at the Canter. I aloo organize and attend all off duty activities offered for the Seniors. My goals for 1985 will be to incroace the quality of services and recreational activities now offered at the Center. I hope to continuo the rate of growth in participants that we have built up over the years, and key in on doing more for the frail elderly population. DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORT Y.M.C.A. (M.M.) 1986 Report Referral Source and Reason for Referral Summary Males Females Total Clients 78 32 Source of Referrals Court 61 Welfare 9 School 20 Self 11 Family 6 Peer 3 Roforral Source DW Assessed Reason for Roason for Referral Referral CRunaway 5 0 Inappropriate School Behavior 12 0 Drug Abuse 9 5 Property Crime 36 0 Violent Crime 3 0 Unmanageable Home Behavior 5 0 Family Problems 20 70 Self Estcom 1 5 Sexual Abuse 6 6 Physical Abuse or Neglect 2 2 Vocational Asaintanco 2 12 Survival Needs 12 12 duplicated counts 1986 Work Program Goals 1. Work with 100 clients referred by court, school, wolfaro, individuals or othor appropriate agencies. 2. Conduct individual counsoling with clients. 3. Conduct group counaaling using rostitution work groups, 3 NYPUM groups and traditional group counseling using YMCA sottingo. 6. Assist clionto and families in mooting basic needs. Performance to 1984 Work Program Goals 1. 110 Clients (62 "active" at present). 2. Individual counseling with all 110 clients. 3. 27 kids in restitution groups. 26 kids in NYPUM groups. 10 kids in talk group. 4. Assisted people dealing with county, hospitals, treatment centers, employment services, and court situations. Delivered approximately 500 pounds of food this winter to clients in need. 1984 "Result" Goal 1. Achieve a 758 nonrecidivism rate among court referred clients for the duration of their participation in my program and the 6 months following termination. Performance to 1984 Result Goal 1. Nonrecidivism rate of 83.6%. 51 Clients having no juvenile justice involvement during the specified term. 10 having various degrees of involvement. 1985 Work Program Goals 1. Work with 100 clients referrod by court, school, welfare, individuals or other appropriate agencies. 2. Conduct individual counseling with clients. 3. Conduct group counseling using restitution work groups, 3 NYPUM groups, and traditional group counseling using YMCA settings. 4. Aooist clients and families in mooting basic needs. 5. Develop subsidized youth employment program at YMCA Camp during summer of 1985. 1985 Result 1. Achieve a 756 nonrocidiviam roto among court referred clients during their participation in the program and the 6 months following their termination. --_ .- -__----:tet--_ - -- _ - -- - - - ------ -_.. -- -�- .� GENERAL FUND - JANUARY - 1985 AMOUNT CHECK Ni Northern States Power - Utilities 9.510.03 20008 Gary Anderson - Misc. mileage 61.33 20009 M.Y. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees 205.00 20010 MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees 102.00 20011 MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees 324.00 20012 Banker's Life Ins. - Croup Ins. 4,086.14 20013 M. State Treasurer - lns. premium - L. Cillham 9.00 20014 National Life' Ins. - T. Eidem ins. premium 100.00 20015 Wright County Highway Dept. - Sand 6 salt mixture 1,608.75 20016 B. F. Goodrich - Tires 112.96 20017 AME Ready Mix Co. - Sand 46.50 20018 Big Lake Lumber - Materials for Mtce. Building - insulation 670.25 20019 Seita. Hardware - Misc. supplies 492.34 20020 Coast to Coast - Misc. supplies 313.79 20021 National Bushing - Misc. supplies 211.99 20022 PLY. St. Supt. Assoc. - Annual dues for Roger Mack 15.00 20023 PBi. Park Supervisors Assoc. - Annual dues for Roger Mack 15.00 20014 0. K. Hardware - Misc. supplies 60.39 20025 Orkin Exterminating - Contract payment for Jan. - WWTP 106.00 20026 The Plumbery - Supplies for Mtce. Bldg. 334.11 20027 Monticello Printing - Printing fuel recnrrl books 85.70 20028 Monticello Times - Adv. 6 council minutes 316.04 20029 Ind. Lumber Co. - Supplies for Mtce. Bldg. 6 WWTP 287.99 20030. Jerry's Auto Salvage - Wheel and tube 30.00 20031 Monticello Office Products - Supplies for all Depts. 153.97 20032 Harry's Auto Supply - Misc. supplies 157.90 20033 Ben Franklin - Film 18.74 20034 Central McCowan - Cyl. rental and oxygen 23.18 20035 Sherburne County Equipment - Misc. screws, bolts, etc. - St. 354.18 20036 Unitog Rental Services - Uniform rental for Dec. 140.80 20037 Ruff Auto Parte - 3 radio antennas 6 speaker 65.00 20038 Snyder Drug - Batteries for Fire Dept. 43.62 20039 Ranger Products - Supplies for WWTP 55.40 20040 McDowall Co. - Repair furnace at City Hall 301.30 20041 Poper,Calmenson 6 Co. - Snow plow blades 211.42 20042 MN. MFOA - Membership fee for R. Wolf Steller 10.00 20043 Monticello Fire Dept. - Reimbursement for expenses in 1984 225.00 20044 State of MN. - Sub. to State Rcglacer 136.89 20045 Howard Dahlgren Assoc. - Nov. and Dec. Planning fees 309.00 20046 Audio Communications - Radios for Civ. Def. 6 mobile radios 5,846.00 20047 Thomas Patco Co. - Tow rope, log chain - St. Dept. 124.00 20048 Tractioneer Co. - Tire chain - St. Dept. 464.75 20049 Fyle Backhoe 6 Sever Service - Steaming water main shut -offs 60.00 20050 Century Laboratories - Deodorizer 6 durabrite - WW'rP 854.38 10051 Brock White Co. - Reinforced plastic - WWTP 180.00 20052 AT 6 T Information Systems - Fire phone charges 3.59 20053 Stnte Treasurer - Surplus Property Fund - Storage cab., etc. 104.50 20054 Maus Foods - Supplies for all Depts. 251.77 20055 Transport Clearings - Freight for cutting blades from Zeigler 27.00 20056 Gordon Link - Gas for St.Dept. 1,663.50 20057 Cruys, Johnson - Computer chargee for November, 1984 290.00 20058 Phillips Petro. Co. - Cas 27.65 20059 Wright County Highway - Raimb. county for 1984 CSAH mtce. 583.77 20060 Business 6 Industrial Comm. - 1984 contribution from City 4,000.00 20061 Buffalo Bituminous - Payment on city projacto 1,998.00 20062 Braun Engineering - Tasting at new Piro (tall alto 1.309.50 20063 Monticello -Big Lake Pet Hospital - Vet face thru Jan. 486.00 20064 Local 049 - Union dues �Q D 126.00 20065 GENERAL FUND AMOUNT CHECK NO. Wright County Treasurer - Fee for mailing Homestead cards 251.24 200E Hoglund Bus Co. - Parts 19.93 200, Thomas Eidem - Car allowance for Jan. 300.00 20068 State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll withholdings 185.04 20069 Jerry Hermes - Cleaning Library 172.92 20070 Mary Ramthun - Animal control expense 212.50 20071 Joseph Johnson - Dog pound mtce. 125.00 20072 Monticello Fire Dept. - Wages thru 12/30/84 630.00 20073 MN. State Treasurer - FICA W/H - 1/1/85 thru 1/15/85 2,883.34 20074 MN. State Treasurer - PERA W/H - 1/1/85 thru 1/15/85 1,553.56 20075 League of MN. Cities - Conf. reg. for T. Eidem 6 R. Wolfateller 100.00 20076 Foster Franzen Agency - Fire Dept. fidelity bonds 30.00 20077 Davie Electronic - Repairs - Fire Dept. 52.71 20078 Wright County Sheriff Dept. - Contract for Jan. 9,783.33 20079 VOID -0- 20080 First Bank Mpls. - Public fund charge 24.00 20081 American Planning Assoc. - Sub. for Guide to Land Use Law 33.95 20082 Govt. Training Service - Reg. fee for Wm. Fair - Seminar 40.00 20083 Northwestern Bell - Fire phone charges 53.43 20084 Electronic Center - Mtce. of equipment - WWPP 20.70 20085 Central Eyewear - Glass frame for R. Cline 12.75 20086 Aspenglow Arte - Calligraphy for certificate 5.00 20087 Rockmount Research and Alloys - Welding rode - WWTP 302.61 20088 Bowman Barnes Diet. - Plow bolt, trouble light, battery,- Mtce. 266.33 20089 Chemical Engineering - Sub. for Eng. mag. 24.50 20090 Mobil 011 - Gas 40.40 20091 Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone services 955.41 200'. Norwest Bank Mple. - Misc. bond payments 624,768.95 20093) First. Bank St. Paul - 1978 Imp. Bond payment 20,974.80 20094 Fidelity Bank 6 Trust - Water Rev. 6 G. 0. Bonds of 1971 21,881.84 20095 First National Bank of Mpla. - '75 6'83 Imp. Bonds 198,796.30 20096 First Trust St. Paul - Tax increment bonds '84 - interest 9,281.26 20097 MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees 214.50 20098 MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees 137.00 20099 MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees 216.00 20100 Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk 6 Co. - Door closer 48.33 20101 J M Oil Co. - Gas 341.55 20102 PLN. Dapt. of Revenue - Water oxeise tax for 4th Qtr. - 1984 268.85 20103 Gary Anderson - Mileage 99,83 20104 League of M;N. Cities - 6 copies of 1985 Directory 64.50 20105 City of Golden Valley - Joint Comparable Worth Study Program 3,840.00 20106 Flicker's T V - 10 pager batteries for Fire Dept. 31.90 20107 Conway Fire 6 Safety - Piker pole for Fire Dept. 78.00 20108 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS FOR JANUARY - 1985 11,121,833.48 J LIQ FUHD -- JANUARY - 1985 LIQUOR DISBURSEMENTS FOR JANUARY - 1985 Banker's Life Ins. - Group Ins. VOID Coast to Coast - Supplies Grosslein Beverage Company - Beer, etc. Bernick's Pepsi Cola - Misc. purchase " Jude Candy & Tobacco - Misc. purchase Old Dutch Foods - Misc. purchase {..' Seven Up Bottling - Misc. purchase Viking Coca Cola - Misc. purchase Dick Beverage Co. - Beer Day Dist. Co. - Beer Thorpe Diet. Co . - Beer Dahlheimer Diet Co. - Beer Richard Doerr - 5 hours surveillance at Store - 12/24/84 Gary Reitan - 6 hra. surveillance at Store - 12/31/84 Ed Phillips d Sone - Liquor Griggs, Cooper S So. - Liquor Engle Wine Co. - Liquor Twin City Wine - Liquor State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded. M. State Treasurer - FICA W/H - 1/1/85 thru 1/15/85 MN. State Treasurer - PERA W/H - 1/1/85 thru 1/15/85 Gruys, Johnson 6 Assoc, - Computer chargee for Nov. -1984 Bridgewater - Telephone services Frito Lay, Inc. - Misc. purchase First Bank Minneapolis - 1976 G. 0. Imp. Bonds MN. Dopt. of Revenue - Sales tax for December, 1984 1 Monticello Times - Adv, for Dec. TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS FOR JANUARY I APOM CHECK 80. 364.91 11582 -0- 11583 46.85 11584 10,252.20 11585 229.75 11586 404.61 11587 77.91 11588 229.50 11589 431.60 11590 2,966.45 11591 680.45 11592 2,871.98 11593 13,576.10 11594 75.00 11595 90.00 11596 3,914.08 11597 1,548.65 11598 892.10 11599' 670.33 11600 20.00 1160 294.89 11602 172.55 11603 110.00 11604 49.25 11605 102.21 11606 22,155.00 11607 8,494.79 11608 84.00 11609 170.805.16 9/0 INDIVIDUAL PUNT ACTIVITY REPORT - MONTH OF December , 1984 1 —T PERMIT DESCRIPTION P NAME/LOCATION VALUATION Fcca NUMBER PERMIT SURCHARGE PLUMBING SURCHARGE B4-717 I New Bay Window,. Reside East AD Don Doren/500 flee[ 4th Street 5 1,470.00 $ 14.30 5 .70 Side of House 84-718 Footings 6 Foundation halls C 103E Com. Hosp. Diet/1104 E. River St. $70,000.00 $343.00 $35.00 TOTALS $71,430.00 $357.30 $35.70 PLAN CHECKING I 1 I ' i 84-718 Footings 6 Foundation Walld C iNBL Com. Hosp. Diet./1104 E. River St $ 222.95 TOTAL PLAN CHECKING FEES $ 222.95 • I I I I i' • 1 TOTAL REVENUE I S 615.95 I I I I 1 I TOTAL NO. PERMITS 16 TOTAL VAIMATION 1,032,360.00 TOTAL, FEES 5,563.63 TOTAL SURCHARGES CURRENT EYYPIN 518.65 1PE7iMiT HAMS _ Number l CITY OP MONTICELLO Multi -family Nonthly Building Department Report 1 Industrial Ree. Garages Month Of December 84 Signs PERMITS and tJSP8 , ALTEWICH M REPAIR � Ik+ellings 1 Tact This Same Month Last Year This Year j PERMTTS ISSU14} Month NOVembel Month December Last Year To Date To Date i RESIDENTIAL SWIMInq Poole , Decks Number , 6 1 1 60 93 Valuation 1152,630.00 S 1,430.00 = 1,500.00 $2,498,127.90 $3,694,087.00 Fees 973.00 14.30 17.50 12,870.89 19,206.02 Surcharges 76.30 .70 .75 1,250.38 1,837.55 COMMERCIAL Number 5 1 28 38 Valuation 879,730.00 70,000.00 1,914 897.40 2,111,159,00 Fees 4,347.63 565.95 10,051.66 12,876.23, Surcharges 439.85 35.00 958.19 11055.70 IN WSTRIAL {{i I Number 3 5 Valuation 681,000.00 1,776,500.00 Fees 2,266.00 8,318.53 Surcharges 340.50 688.65 PWMBING f` Number 5 •' 36 52 `✓ Fees 243.00 1,170.00 1,979.00 Surcharges 2.50 24.50 26.00 OTHERS Number' 10 2 Valuation 40,220.00 0 Fees 548.40 20,00 Surcharges 17.90 TOTAL NO. PERMITS 16 TOTAL VAIMATION 1,032,360.00 TOTAL, FEES 5,563.63 TOTAL SURCHARGES CURRENT EYYPIN 518.65 1PE7iMiT HAMS _ Number Single Family Duplex Multi -family Commercial 1 Industrial Ree. Garages Signs iPublic auii4in;a ALTEWICH M REPAIR � Ik+ellings 1 Commercial i Industrial PLUMBING All types ACCESSORY STRUCTURES SWIMInq Poole , Decks I TEMPORARY PERMIT DEMOLITION TOTALS 2 2 1 137 191 71,430.00 1,50o m 5, 134, 245. 30 - 7,581,746.00 580.25 17.50 26,909.35 42,399.78 35.70 -.75 2,591.x7 _ 3,807.90 Valuation Number to Date ElI PPRThis year Last year., 3 f $ 31 23 1 3 3 6 565.95 35.00 70,000.00 16 12 4 2 7 0 0 3 2 0 14.30 .70 1,430.001 $560.25 $35,70 $71,430.00 42 16 20 15 1 2 52 36 0 3 0 4 0 2 2 2 191 131