Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 06-25-1984AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL June 25, 1984 - 7:30 P.M. C, Mayor: Arve A. Grimsmo Council Members: Fran Fair, Dan Blonigen, Jack Maxwell, Ken Maus. 1. Call to Order. 2. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held June 11, 1984. 3. Citizens Comments/Petitions, Requests and Complaints. Old Business 4. Consideration of a Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for County Road 75, Hart Boulevard, and Cedar Street. 5. Consideration of a Resolution Declaring Hart Boulevard and Cedar Street Projects to be Assessed and Ordering rrI the Preparation of Assessment Roll. �J 6. Consideration of a Resolution Setting Assessment Hearing. New Business 7. Consideration of a Conditional Use Request to Build a 4-plex in an R-2 Zone, Applicant - Tom Chock. 8. Consideration of a Conditional Use Request to Allow Outdoor Sales and Outdoor Storage in a B-3 Zone, Applicant - Martie's Farm Service. 9. Consideration of Approval of Plane and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for Sealcoating Project. 30. Consideration of a Purchase for a Gas Driven Engine for Well No. 2. 11. Consideration of a Resolution Adopting a Punch Card Voting System Plan. 12. Consideration of the 1983 Audit Report. Agenda for the Meeting of the City Council June 25, 1984 - 7:30 P.M. Page 2 13. Consideration of Bills for the Month of June. 14. Adjournmcnt. C MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL L June 11, 1984 - 7:30 P.M. Members Present: Arve A. GrimsmD, Jack Maxwell, Fran Fair, Dan Blonigen. Members Absent: Ken Maus. 1. Call to Order. 2. approval of Minutes. Motion was made by Blonigen, seconded by Maxwell, and unanimously carried to approve the minutes of the regular meeting hold May 29, 1984. 4. Public Hearin - Consideration of Issuance of Industrial Revenue Bonds, Applicant - Stuart Ho4lund. A public hearing was held by the City Council to consider Stuart Iloglund's request for issuance, of Industrial Revenue Bonds in the amount of $550,000.00 for the construction of a 32 -unit motol. Mr. John Cries, attorney representing Mr. Hoglund, noted that the original application for Industrial Revenue Bonds was for $650,000.00 but has been reduced to $550,000.00. lie also noted that the development should provide 20 full-time employees, not 12 as initially stated. Fir. Cries noted that even if the City Council approves this preliminary application for induatrial Rovenuo Bonds, the developer is fully aware that the Stato DelDartment of Enorgy and Economic Development. has final authority for authorizing Industrial Revenue Bonds to be approved. Mayor Crimtmo introduced for the record a letter received from the present ownore of the Silver Fox Motel expressing their opposition to the City involvement in issuance of Industrial Rovenuo Bonds for additional molal rooms within the City. Silver Fox management noted that although Industrial Rovenuo Bonds aro an incentive for developers. Ilio curront motel rooms within the City aro not yet operating near capacity on a your -round basis and felt that the City ehould not holp promote additional motel devulopmont until a need is established. Mayor Crimamo noted that the City's first approval of Industrial Revenue Bonds was for the Silver Fox Motel, but at that time, the City of Monticello did not have any motol' rooms within the City limits. Applicant Stuart Hoglund felt the need is 'still a reality in the City � D and noted that he has largo assausmanta for improvemonts against his property and felt that something has to be built and requested that IRB'a be considorad to help finance the project. Cou ci I Minutes - 6/11/84 Concerns were raised by Council members as to what direction the City should be taking in the future when support;ng Industrial Revenue Bond applicants. Specifically, Council concerns centered on whether the City should be involved in commercial or industrial development as IRS's were initially intended for. Although no general consensus was or has been yet es Ldblished as guidelines by the City, it was noted that generally the City is Crying to provide incentives for new businesses to locate within the City to provide not only tax base increases but also employmenL, and specially in areas the City currently does not have businesses. Hearing no comments from the public, the public hearing was olticially closed. 5. Consideration of d Resolution Granting Preliminary Approval for the Issuance of Industrial Revenue Bonds. After further discussion on Mr. Hoglund's IRB request, a ,notion was introduced by Maxwell to adopt a resolution giving preliminary approval to Mr. Iloglund's IRB project. The motion died for a lack of a second. As a result, no other motion was entered and pre- liminary approval was not granted for this project. r . 6. Consideration of Sower Extension for Bondhus Property. At the previous Council meeting, the City Council passed a resolution to add a portion of water main to Lim Hart Boulevard project to allow for future crossing on County Road 75 for hook-up to the Bondhuu Tool property. The sewer connection was tabled for lack of adequate bids. Public works Director John Simola noted Lhdc so far only one firm quote has bcoa received for providing sewar service to the Bondhuo properly estimated at $19,666.OU for connection to the inLercaPLor sewer line. Mr. Simola, along with .john liondhus, felt that this Bust was uxccssivoly high,and Mr. Simola was still optimistic that a cont cstimato can be obtained in the $10,000 to $12,000 ranyo. As a result, motion was made by Fair, seconded by Blonigen, asci unanimously carried to allow the Itondhus Tool Conyrany to Conned to the interceptor sewer line Providing 100% of Lha cost is chargud to the BOndhus proPurty. 7. Consideration of the Renewal of Annual Licenses. Motion was made by nlonigen, seconded by Fair, and unanimously carriud to spprovo Lha issuance and renewal of Lha following annual Iicanuosr U Council Minutes - 6/11/84 Intoxicating Liquor, On -sole (Fee $3,300) Renewals 1. Monticello Liquor, Inc. 2. Silver Fax 3. Charlie's West 4. Joyner's Lanes a Intoxicating Liquor, On -sale, Sundav (Fee $100) Renewals 1. Monticello Liquor, Inc. 2. Silver Fox 3. Charlie's West 4. Joyner's Lanes Non -intoxicating Malt, On -sale (Fee $245) Renewals 1. Rod 6 Gun 2. Pizza Factory �( Jj 3. Country Club Non-Intoxicatinq Malt, On -sale, Temnorary (Fee $10/day) 1. St. Henry's Fall Festival, 2 days - $20.00 tion-intoxicatinq Malt, Off -solo (Pao $50.00) Renewals 1. Monticello Liquor 2. Ernios Sport B Bait Shop 3. Wayne's Rod Owl 4. Maus Foods 5. River Terrace G. Tom Thumb 7. Charlie's West B. holiday Wine/3.2 Door Combination, On -sale (Fee $400) Renewal F(11 1. Dino's Doli a Council Minutes - 6/11/84 a' Set-up License (Fee $250) 1. Country Club 2. Rod 6 Gun Club Licenses (Fee - set by Statute) 1. V.F.W. - $500 (membership 268) 2. Am. Legion - $650 (membership 580) Bingo, Temporary (Fee $20) 1. St. Henry's Fall Festival Gambling, Temporary ($20 per device) 1. St. Henry's Fall Festival - $60 Rick Wolfsteller 6' Assistant Administrator 4 - C Council Agenda - 6/25/84 4. Consideration of a Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for County Road 75, Hart Boulevard, and Cedar Street. (J.S.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: As the Council may recall, this item was delayed several weeks due to delays in obtaining preliminary suvey data such as the area photos. The plans and specifications were delivered to the City of Monticello late Wednesday morning by Mr. Chuck Lepak, the Project Engineer. A general description of the following projects is as follows. County Road 75 Starting from a point near Oakview Circle on the west end of Monticello, County Road 75 will receive a 1 -inch bituminous leveling course and a 1 -inch bituminous wearing course. The shoulders will be paved a distance of 8 feet on either side of the existing roadway. This will be continued easterly until the west side of Chestnut Street. At this point, all the way easterly to a point just past the east high school entrance, Broadway will be reconstructed. An exception to this, of course, is that portion which was repaired three years ago going east from the stoplights. The Broadway project will begin with complete removal of the existing 5 inches of bituminous surface by whichever means the contractor deems necessary. This will more than likely mean that it will be broken up into chunks with loaders and hauled out in large slabs. The existing Class V will be leveled and added to where nocessary. The bituminous surface itself will consist of a 2 -inch 2331 bituminous base course, a 1�-inch 2331 bituminous binder course, and a 1 -inch 2341 modified bituminous wearing course. The total thickness of the asphalt will be 4� inches. The remaining portion of County Road 75 on the oast end of Monticello from the high school to a point a few hundred foot past County Road 39 will receive similar treatment to that as the west end of town. Thore will be a 1 -inch 2331 bituminous leveling course and a 1 -inch 2341 modified bituminous wearing course. - 1 - Council Agenda - 6/25/84 The shoulders will receive a 2 -inch layer of 2331 bituminous material to a width of 8 feet on either side of the roadway. A right turn lane will be installed at County Road 118. The Cedar Street Project The Cedar Street Project is being proposed in two different ways. One is to construct the road to a width of 33 feet using a rural section with 4 -foot gravel shoulders. The other alternative method is to construct a 36 -foot wide street with B-618 curbing on each side of the street. In either case, the engineer has concluded that the street portion itself shall consist of 6 inches of Class V aggregate base with 2 inches of bituminous base course and 2 inches of 2341 modified bituminous wearing course. The hydrant located in the area of Cedar Street near the Burlington Northern Railway will be moved westerly, as it is too close to the roadway. A "T" will be placed in this hydrant, line to allow future connection to the water main for those properties located west of Cedar Street. In addition, a short section if 8 -inch gravity sanitary sewer will be laid under Cedar Street for future use, and a 6 -inch water service CA, will be provided for future use to the east side of Cedar Street. If curb and gutter is chosen, curb cuts will be provided for proposed Sixth Street, the cemetery, and the existing Wilbur Eck properties along Cedar Street. Hart Boulevard Project The Hart Boulevard Project shall consist of a combination of urban section with curb and gutter on the west one-half and a rural type section with 4 -foot gravel shoulders on the east one-half. The curbing will continue from the specialty clinic easterly to the WWTP driveway. The street width will vary from the existing 41 -foot width on the west end of the project to a 33 -foot width on the rural section on the east and of the project. Tho stroet construction itself will consist of 6 inches of Class V aggregate base with 2 inches of 2341 bituminous base course and 2 inches of 2341 modified bituminous wearing course. 2 - Council Agenda - 6/25/84 In addition to the street work there will be some relatively minor storm sewer construction on the west end of the project and a small catch basin and culvert in the central portion of the project near the WWTP driveway. In addition, State law dictates that pedestrian ramps will be installed at sidewalk entrances when new curbing is placed. Therefore, Bondhus' sidewalk will receive pedestrian ramps. In addition, the water main located on the north side of Hart Boulevard near the Lindberg home will be extended easterly to the intersection of Hart Boulevard and County Road 75. At that point, a hydrant will be located and the water main will turn and follow County Road 75 approximately 20 feet. This will be done so that we may extend the water main or cross County Road 75 without digging into the Hart Boulevard intersection at a later date. The plans and specifications for your review at City Hall are not complete. The project engineer, Charles Lepak, and myself discussed the following additions or omissions from the plans, which will be added to the plans and brought for your review for Monday evening's meeting. i 1. Six inch water service for the east side of Cedar Street. N 2. Curb cut for the cemetery on Cedar Street. 3. Pedestrian ramps for Bondhus' sidewalk and Hart Boulevard. 4. Small catch basin and culvert on Hart Boulevard near the WWTP driveway. 5. The water main extension on Hart Boulevard. 6. The use of 100% crushed Class V on the shoulders in the rural section on Hart Boulevard. 7. Verification of necessity to change hydrant locations on Hart Boulevard due to interference with new street construction. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. This alternative would be to adopt a resolution accepting the plana and specifications as proposed - 3 - Council Agenda - 6/25/84 with the additions listed above and authorize advertisement for bids to be returned July 19, with both the assessment hearing and the approval of the project to take place on July 23. There would still be time to meet this time table even if some minor changes were made in the projects. 2. This alternative would involve major changes as deemed necessary by the Council in any of the projects. If any significant changes are made, the entire time table of the projects would be delayed and have to be rescheduled. 3. This alternative would be to delete one or more of the projects. At this particular time I know of no reason for any of the projects to be deleted. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the staff recommendation that after a thorough discussion of the proposed projects at Monday night's meeting that the necessary changes be made as dictated by the discussions. The staff, at this time, feels confident that there need not be any significant changes to the projects. Therefore, we feel that Alternative 01 will be the logical course to follow. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Plans and specifications for the projects. (These are available at City Nall for your roviow) C - 4 - 1A Council Agenda - 6/25/84 5. Consideration of a Resolution Declaring Hart Boulevard and Cedar Street Projects to be Assessed and Orderino the Preparation of Assessment Roll.(T.E.) 6. Consideration of a Resolution Setting Assessment Hearing. (T.E.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: With respect to the proposed projects for the improvements of County Road 75, Hart Boulevard, and Cedar Street, and because there was some concern voiced at the public improvement hearing with respect to assessments, it is the staff's position that the assessment hearing be held prior to the ordering of the project. The entire principle of assessing is based on the notion that an individual's property value increases at least as much as the cost of the assessment. Because there is little assessable property in the Hart and Cedar Projects, and that you elected not to assess any of the restoration along Broadway, the assessment on affected property owners could be quite high. If we authorize the project to be done, and then did the project before determining the assessment, if successfully challenged, the City could share a substantial part of the bill. In order to circumvent challenges to the assessment, staff is proposing that the assessment roll be conducted prior to authorizing the job, but based on the actual bids that are submitted. If at the time of the hearing the objections arc still overwhelming and we aro notified that the affected property owners intend to challenge the assessments in court, than the decision to do the project can be halted. The two resolutions that you must address are 1) declaring that the project is to bo accessed and ordering the preparation of an assessment roll, and 2) a resolution setting a hearing on the assessment roll. Th000 conceivably could have boon combined into a single resolution, but in order to keep the paper trail clear. I am requesting the adoption of two resolutions. Those resolutions are also ossantial for the aals of bonds in order to pay for the Hart and Cedar Projects. No action other than considering the reoolutiona needs to bo taken at this time. D. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Do not adopt tho rosolutions - without adopting the resolutions at this time, the City would have two directions that they could go. First, they could elect to diaponeo with assessments and pay the entire coot by themselves. Thio financially would not bo a good movo. Secondly, you could ch0000 to - 5 - Council Agenda - 6/25/84 Cadopt these resolutions upon completion of the project and face the potential challenges of assessments at that time, after the financial commitment has already been made. r� L Adopt the resolutions- this would allow us to prepare the roll and hold the hearing prior to ordering the job. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the resolutions so that we may commence with the preparation of the roll and the holding of the hearing prior to ordering construction. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copies of the resolutions proposed for adoption. E. ADMINISTRATOR'S ADDENDUM: One stumbling block has been encountered in preparing for the financing of all of these projects. in the 1984 Budget, we planned to issue public improvement bonds for all of these projects. Under MS 429, the City must assess at least 208 of the overall project in order to issue these types of bonds without a referendum. Anticipating full assessment on Hart and Cedar and even some partial assessment for reconstruction along Broadway, we new absolutely no difficulty in issuing bonds under 429. The snag that we have run into, however, is that you elected to not assoss for any of the Broadway construction and aro at this point at least considering a reduced assonamont rate for the Hart and Cedar Projects. Assessing Cedar and Hart at a 20% rate would obviously not moot the threshold for 208 of the overall combined projects. Thus, any bonds issued could only be issued to addreso the improvements of Hart and Cedar, and monies for the City's share of 75 would need to coma from either the Capital Improvement Revolving Fund, Surplus Investment Funds, or from the bonds that are authorized by a general referendum. The referendum proposal looks unrealistic, for we would have to cancel the job for this year. After consulting with Rick, we do, in fact, have the money available and designated as surplus funds to simply pay them from the City account. However, and we will know better after diocuesing the matter with Jerry Shannon prior to the meeting, if we choose to access approximately 359 of Hart and Cedar, this will take us over the 20% throahold for the combined total of the throe projects, hones becoming eligible for the bond issuance. Rick and I did discuss the possibility of proposing to the affoctod property owners that 35-401 will be aosossod. We realize this dean not moot their original request that they receive 201 assessment, but it is still a drastic reduction from the prop000d 100% - 6 - Council Agenda - 6/25/84 assessment. we also think that this can be justified in that the City's refusal back in 1978 was a legitimate refusal based upon proposed future public improvements. It is perfectly legitimate for a City to deny extension of utilities if it is not economically or physically feasible to provide those facilities. The City, however, does not have to guarantee an assessment formula for the future when they have made a decision to delay a public improvement. We think that this might be the most effective way to approach the financing matter. As I noted, we do have funds available to pay for the Broadway project outright. That money could easily be recaptured in the next year or two through tax levy under the Capital Improvement Revolving Program. in fact, a large sum of the 1984 CIR levy, being unallocated, could be dedicated to this project. To recover this surplus funding would not create a now or unusual tax burden on the property owners in the City. It is, however, from a financial point of view, more desirable to finance public improvements with bond funds. After all, that is why bond funds exist. It might be vise at this time to simply order the preparation of the assessment roll without designating a specific percentage formula to be used. This would allow staff to work with the varying percentages in preparing a roll (or a number of proposed assessment roll a) that will beat accommodate our financial arrangements. r I presume that after talking with Jerry Shannon of Springsted, I will have a clearer understanding of our alternatives. I will provide any extra information I have at the meeting Monday night. c - 7 - CRESOLUTION 1984 M_ RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT WHEREAS, bids have been requested for the improvement of Hart Boulevard between the Monticello -Big Lake Hospital and East County Road 39 and Cedar Street between Lauring Lane and the Burlington Northern Railroad by constructing new road surfaces, curb and gutter, and other appurtenant work, and the Engineer's estimated cost for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement are estimated to be S so that the total cost of the improvement is estimated to be 5 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY 71iE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of t11e cost of such improvement to be paid by the city is hereby estimated to be $ , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is estimated to be $ C2. The City Adminiatrator, with the assistance of the Consulting City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate thu proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the District affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall filo a copy of such Proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. Adopted by the Council this 25th day of June, 1984. Thomas A. F.ldcm City Administrator C Arvo A. Grimsmo, Mayor 0 RESOLUTION 1984 H_ RESOLUTION SETTING A HEARING ON THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 11, 1984, the City Administrator was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving Hart Boulevard between the Monticello -Big Lake Hospital and East County Road 39 and for Cedar Street between Louring Lane and the Burlington Northern Railroad by constructing new street surfacing, curb and gutter, and other appurtenant work, and WHEREAS, the City Administrator has notified the Council that such proposed assessment shall be complete and filed in his office for public Inspection no later than July 5, 1984. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be hold on the 23rd day of July, 1984, in the City Hall at 7:30 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Administrator Is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. Ila shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each pareol described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 25th day of Juno, 1904. Thomas A. Eidom City Administrator I Arvo A. Grimsmo, Mayor 001 Council Agenda - 6/25/84 7. Consideration of a Conditional Use Reauest to Build a 4-plex in an R-2 Zone, Applicant - Tom Chock. (G.A.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Mr. Chock is proposing to build a 4-plex in an R-2 Zone. A 4-plex or 4 -unit apartment building is only allowed as a Conditional Use in an R-2 Zone. In the attached site plan, Mr. Chock does meet the setbacks as required by Ordinance in R-2 Zoning. The units proposed would be all two-bedroom unite with detached single car garages and with a parking lot consisting of four off-street parking spaces. The Planning Commission granted the Conditional Use Request to allow a 4 -unit apartment building in an R-2 Zone with the following condition: that the setback on the westerly side of the proposed 4-plex be a 15 -foot sideyard setback instead of a 10 foot sideyard setback. The next door neighbor, Mr. Olson, was in and asked if he could have additional sideyard setback between his existing house and the proposed 4-plex to be built. Mr. Chock agreed. He didn't have any problem with the additional setback on that side with the exception that Zoning Administrator Gary Anderson brought up, that being should the lot ever be sold off and Mr. Chock to no longer the owner, there would need to be a driveway installed to service the back parking lot and rear garage sial;s. Mr. Chock is currently proposing to utilize the existing driveway of the ? current 4-plax just to the east of the proposed new 4-plax building to service the rear parking lot and rear garages of the proposed now 4 -plea building. An you will notice on tho site plan of the proposed 4-plex site, with the 10 foot setback as required by Ordinance on the west edge of the property, it would leave 27 foot on the easterly edge. Allowing for the minimum 3 foot separation between two driveways and allowing for a 12 -foot driveway would leave us 12 foot of distance along aide the parking lot. Mr. Chock had indicated in all likelihood that there would be more footage loft between the driveways if this should over occur due to the fact of the abnormal amount of snow that collocto in this area during the winter season to allow morn room to remove the snow in between the driveways on both properties. This is only for a point of information. City staff goon along with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval with the condition attached of a 15 -foot aidoyard setback on the westerly aide of the property instead of a 10 - foot required by Ordinance. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Approve the Conditional Use Request to allow a 4-plex or 4 -unit apartment building in an R-2 Zone. 2. Deny the Conditional Use Request to allow a 4-plox or a i/ 4 -unit apartment building in an R-2 Zone. - 8 - C Council Agenda - 6/25/84 C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Request to build o 4 -unit apartment building in an R-2 Zone with one condition, that being a 15 -foot eideyard setback on the west edge of the property instead of a 10 -foot eideyard setback. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the proposed location of the proposed 4 -plea or 4 -unit apartment building; Copy of the site plan of the proposed 4-plex; Pictures to be presented at the Monday night City Council meeting showing the location of the proposed 4-plex. - 9 - I'L '-J_L_�1 --' -- - ------------'---- : DDRESS g -7 �/�7)] 3FY� S e- e / _. PER141 i NJMCR-'----- f `SCR 71014 LOT .�( y- �'" Lot -3 BLOC Y._7a ADDI TIO,4_L)& 1 1/,335 Si.r,. Dr RIIEA O,,a1+lED UY WILD�P�CX r�5�� IvARA�e - :. fi. Of :iITC AREA I NS IL- 111011 70 ADPL I L L, III 111r+LCO "OT nc L•.LD :nc• P101 •'l•r:$ un •Yu t0 .9c.Lr •.0 rlLcn '. 111+ L11: r•n+nlT .—LIC•tlMl. On r+L OVILbl:+01, r6G•I:[ T'r tOLLOvI•IC 1•n'O •IM•f tOr+l ICCM IOU pr PnOPO}rn Cun r.t uUCT10n •nD cal :T lr:f. ,.•r AQV[w C M TS, sMO+ out L:•1nc :rel •r,n SC IU•Ca OIM1 .1 .1. 'I Inu+ L•M1HI;rrt rl vl.rl con TOUnS On U•i.V vnr.L, upl rLOOn ILLV✓11Cn9, sl+•LCl tLLV•T 10•+ •un SCwI •. [LCZVTIpv, 'lnOw LOCPTIO•I or v•IUI, sC1+f.U, :D LLr.CTwIC.L �C-V ICC LI_S. .n0�' L[IC •[tOr+1 Or 1UnVLr PIn1, nl•CC Ir'Y I.IC u•.0 Or C�+Cn DUILDIr:L `• •+D L•CM MAJOn P027101 TnLuCOr, INDICATE NORTH IN CIRCLE EACH l.11lpll f. UARI-. Clnl.tl :• 101-0'• IIY t0l-0° —u S 20 P 17t�,:NG SA9�.CS --..._--!----- ... 3dd..Sit4i,& 1 I. 1 I..I— . 1. 1. 1._ II W Irl that t•e D+nnu•wl rOrrin urnUn w -ll +Unlo'm In In• �nrn•nIi„ .I ,iN . r .n.•w i� .rn�w• .r •I "I rI ni• i nnryrt win Irr i. erl•' w.ln r I.r •t UUt++nUq Anel u. •I. .. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • —71CwA LV1T�P"iDl+q[rt'ptTCprlT wtCTprt-on-'rL'1':1_ytnr AT'ISC— ••rt s•••...... ••••••u•••••••u•.•..I•.............................................. (rpn Cllr ust pnLT) ,r:1:0 APPROVI:O UY.---- OUC t �• M �OL y /,.:. .. �! t' �v ti7��• "c-.•...,, r.9 ! L:...:. ler r �, = tjPt t 7r C-4 fill � r• � et':�,.z�'1' �\�:,;:• } 'i' ��Y~ - ��"'-'.... � '+`��w....,.,� �'MI jj'alw.•, ,' �`��..',.� .,�,j\ ,i• ``: `"�, arluzy �' ; jar ,,.., ,� � �, i. Mj t.�'�•• !h; ,� �-,•,•»�'...'..`-�.:a��' .' �« 9 '+„-.,,,67 4 !,�,�,t-.,,� '.,y' �.•���✓'-1 ..t'�•�'}...,,,y � � �vt�,,�', ��� 1.,`ui,'r.. . q a .Yar •�- 4''���'"'r+, r``y✓�':}P �'t � �y.,. P. ` i1�\,''r:'';.'i.1"'"`',F� ��r-�' '`•--,� ' ••• �• i ( ",,,,..fl'. -}...s +.• +` Vs„� r: „T•:�.,,�`a�.l fir..' -� t � t . ",,..;,,,,, �' v .•i7" �t i,•�}•,i.,e..,t..y, '+" �j �7I�1 HIGHWAY No. 94VL all% t 4 4S . Council Agenda - 6/25/84 8. Consideration of a Conditional Use Request to Allow Outdoor Sales and Outdoor Storage in a B-3 Zone, Applicant - Martie's Farm Service. (G.A.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Mr. Martie, as part of his farm service business, would like to be allowed to do two conditions which are only allowed as Conditional Uses in a B-3 Zone. The first one he would like to be allowed is outdoor sales. From this Mr. Martie would like to sell white cedar poste. This is currently the only item which he sells which would be sold from the outside of his building. In doing so, if approved, Mr. Martie's location of the proposed cedar poets would be directly to the rear of his building, approximately 30-35 feet away from the rear of the building and stacked in a neat pile. Also Mr. Martie would like to be allowed outside liquid storage. From the outside liquid storage Mr. Martie would like to be allowed to sell liquid protein from an approximate 6,000 gallon tank. The tank size is approximately 8' x 16', which would either be a vertical tank 8 feet wide by 16 feet tall or a horizontal tank 8 feet wide, 16 foot long. The placement of this tank would be directly behind the existing building. If approved, the tank does not need to have an area to contain a spill. The material dispensed from this tank is not a hazardous or a flammable material, therefore, not needing any spillage area around the outside of the tank as required by the Uniform Fire Code. Planning Commission approved both Conditional Use Requests with screening fence 8 foot in height and no lase than 6 fact in height being installed on the west, north and south ends of the sales lot with no required screening fence along Marvin Road, which would be on the east aide. That area is to be used for loading and unloading. R. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Approve the Conditional Use Request to allow outdoor solos in a B-3 Zone. 2. Approve the Condit.innal Use Request to allow outdoor storage in a B-3 Zone. 3. Deny the Conditional Use Request to allow outdoor sales in a B-3 Zone. 4. Deny the Conditional Una Request to allow outdoor storage in a B-3 Zone. - 10 - Council Agenda - 6/25/84 C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends approval of both Conditional Use Requests for outdoor Bales and outdoor storage in a B-3 Zone with the required screening fence being installed. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the proposed location of the outdoor sales and outdoor storage area; Copy of the proposed site plan for the location of the outdoor sales and outdoor storage; Picture to be presented at Monday night Council meeting on the proposed site. C LLIJ No. 94 Conditio'nal Use Request 00 to 'allow outd6dr, sales and outdoor storage in a B-3 zone. Martie!s Form Service. Council Agenda - 6/25/84 9. Consideration of Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for Sealcoating Project. (J.S.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: As part of the City of Monticello's Comprehensive Street Maintenance Program, the Public Works Department is involved in crack scaling, patching, and the scheduling of overlays and sealcoating. In the past few years the City of Monticello has received most favorable bids on the sealcoating portion of our maintenance program. This has allowed us to do somewhat more sealcoating each year than was originally scheduled. A typical year would find us doing approximately 90,000 square yards of sealcoating. This year, the project is down -sized to approximately 24,000 aq. yards. It includes four areas. Area 41 is the Lauring Hillside area, which includes Lauring Lane, Seventh Street, Washington Street, Ramsey Street, Wright Street, and Cedar Street, all south of the Burlington Northern Railroad. Area 02 is Kampa Circle west of the Maintenance Building off County,Road 39. Area #3 is Riverside Circle near the Riverside Cemetery off of River Street. Area #4 is the Walnut Street parking Iota and adjoining areas behind Johnson's Store and Harry's Auto Supply. On ono of the previous aoalcoating projects, we experienced some stripping of the aggregate from the asphalt emulsion. Several reasons could have accounted for the stripping of the aggregate. The job was done later in the year than normal, it is possible the oil content was slightly below that recommended for the rock, and/or the asphalt amulsion and aggregate contact time may have boon too long. The coalcoat job performed loot year was bettor in that no obvious areas of stripping were found. We do, however, feel that we can obtain better results by increasing the amount of asphalt amuleion used and changing to a granite chip typo of aggregate. Bocauco the project is down -sized this year, we propose to try this granite chip to achieve a bettor wearing, longer lasting and a more aesthetic looking surface on the streets and the proposed parking lot project. Duo to this change, we can expect a modest increase in the cost of the aoalcoating. We have placed in the budget an C " - 12 Council Agenda - 6/25/84 �`- amount of $19,300.00 for the proposed project. In chocking with recent bid lettings on sealcoat projects with this type of aggregate, I found that the price is to be in the neighborhood of 504 per square yard. Adding another nickel or so for sweeping would put us up around $14,000.00 for the project. This is approximately $5,000.00 below budget. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Alternative 11 would be to approve the plane and specifications using the granite chips with a completion date of August 24, 1984. we would expect the bids to be returned on July 9 for consideration by the Council at that evening's meeting. 2. Alternative 42 would be to continue to use the buckshot type of sealcoat. 3. This alternative would be to use a combination of the chip seal in the parking lot and use the buckshot on the streets. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the staff recommendation that we go to the chip typo / of eealcoating as outlined in Alternate 01 for the parking 7` lots and the street portion. We can re-evaluate thin small project prior to doing our 1985 eealcoating project, which will be a significantly larger area. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Plano and specifications will be available Monday afternoon at City Hall for your review. C - 13 - L f Council Agenda - 6/25/84 10. Consideration of a Purchase for a Gas Driven Engine for Well No. 2. (J -S-) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The addition to the pump houses are well underway and should be complete within the next few weeks. AS part of the construction, we have added an engine room to Pump House No. 2 to alleviate the necessity of getting a tractor to the well during emergencies. We placed into the 1984 Budget a sum of $5,000.00 for the installation of an engine to drive the well during emergencies. During 1983 and 1984 we have checked numerous times with Federal Surplus Property in attempts to obtain a new or rebuilt engine from the federal government. We were unable, however, to find a suitable engine for the pump house. All of the engines were either too large or too small. Our requirements are 70 RP at approximately 1800 RPM. I obtained two quotes on such an engine for the Council's consideration. I obtained a quote on a Ford power unit from Northern Ford Engines in Minneapolis, and I obtained a quote on Waukesha Engine from Jeffco Power Systems in Minneapolis. The Ford Engine quoted is identical to the angina used in the City's sower jet for the Collection Department and the Snowrid snowblower for the Street Department. The Waukesha Engine which I requested a quote on is identical to the unit at the WWTP, which provides air for the blowers for the activated sludge procoso. All throe of the power units the City has have given good service. The quotes solicited were for 6 cylinder engines with a minimum rating of 70 HP at 1800 RPM. we requested that quotas be givon for an LP or natural gas carburatod angina. The quotas aro as followo: Northern Ford Power Jaffco Power Systems Minneapolis, MN Minneapolis, MN 6 cylinder Ford Engine 6 cylinder Waukesha Engine Delivery: 2 weeks Delivery: 2-3 weeks Price: $4,206.00 Price: $10,500.00 In addition to the angina, it will be necessary to install a pulley system and multiple V -bolt drive from the angina to the wall unit. This drive is similar to the driven currently used by the City for other purposes. I have a price from Knott Company in Minneapolis of approximately $620.00 for thio drivo. Thorn will be coma additional concrete that would have to be poured in the building an a pad mount for the angina and coma duct work that would be needed. If we purchased the Ford Engine at $4,206.00, the rout of the supplemental equipment is expected - 14 - Council Agenda - 6/25/86 to cost $1,000.00, bringing us at $5,206.00. This is within reasonable limits of the budgeted figure of $5,000.00. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Alternative #1 would be to purchase the Ford Engine as outlined above and install the necessary accessory equipment to use it to power the well. 2. Alternative 42 would be to continue to look for a used engine or a rebuilt or a new engine through the Federal Surplus Property Program and in the meantime continue to use the City's 2500 International Tract,)r to power the well. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the staff recommendation that we use Alternate 01 above that we purchase the Ford Engine and install it in the pump room of Well House No. 2. The installation could be complete by mid-July. D. SUPPORTING DATA: r Quote from Northern Power Products and Joffco Power Systems. eywl SOILS iv �,v K 1b . ER , .. L;: NORTHERN POWER PRODUCTS, INC. � • 7815 EAGANDALE BLVD., P 0 BOX 21 348, EAGAN, httJ 55171 612 451 8900 CRL1_ TOLL FREE U U O T A T 10 N , 1-800-752-4249 Ext. 697 - in Minn 1-800-328-4815 Ext. 697. outside Minn TO: DATE .Inns• 11, 1984 City of plonciccllo - - 250 East Broadway ATTE(fflOtJ Nr. 1,,hn Simula ?:onticcllo, Pin. 5530 Public lurks Director JOB N0. 195-3170 FORD Ilasoline Cngine Oprn Powtr Unit., water cooled, Model CSG-649-6002ER, rated at 70 HP lI 1800 RI'M continuous, with the iollowing accennuries: Cooling: Radiator, Fan - Mounted Lube oll filter - full flue Covernor Starter - 12 volt Alternator - 12 volt, 37 amp Hntnrnlu Exhaust pipes Instrument paaol: )J1 prct,sure gauge, tempel-ALUra cringe, arlmeter, kt-y switch, nutomatlC shuWown un low n11 preiinure and high teriperarnre, throttle control cables Air Cleaner. Dry PTO - Alda load - Rockford type Owner Literature NET PRICE ------------------- ------------- 94,111.09 Optional items: I•P/Natural gni carburetion - NC •rachleeeter/hour meter - $95.00 AtI-PA-t US A AL WU01tUc1J'Il lyl.l A l ;. ,N IMNI.•Iw 11 fel MNlr wlll�A PI "Unit 1111. ri11 •,,,1 A.1 •.l,t/!111 "I UP Ul M�wI, LI'I, 115 UA 1,,11 11'•11111 h', Nli 4i,.'IIN,IINIA �1 All, wVw�l wll�lll, Nr ,y �IMIwUIl P• .i 4ENTS F 0 8 I ig—� Mn Ovol46nn Pl.te Valid tnlu�cTtum6..r. j{Y ,- Df.l1rC��..4 V♦'r:>lr . / - SHIPMENTS MADE AFTER ABOVE DAtt. AHL SLIUA (I 101'Rtt,l (14ANvs / r 1nm, - c 1 roved B, /`I is- : t 70 Qlyr J1R11A X110 ,)I- crrdit, or cash. Ruyvr S. Ilrvlrk, Presldent 0/0 1 MODEL 250GP MODEL 300GF j.TT I Inlet �IuIatI.P 11 4 , l:1.Y°° UOSnNWnl 'InU.I.VmnInJI . I..a:1.0, NOV.0UMCS gcI., ;] 26L0Yn"7.1 IN II -. T00PVN I—V. J1 1nW5 1 VI-V II ' • � NVY 4.1 Litre (250 CID) `, 4.9 Litre (300 CID) 6- yl. -- Gasoline, 6-cyl. • - Gasolineo QUOTATION AND CONTRACT John Simila City of Monticello Monticello, Minnesota ]PS 2238 Florida Avenue South St. Louie Pork, Mlnnemts 55426 16121 5465560 .QUOTATION NUMBER "3635 Gemlemen: DATF June 18, 1994 Thank you for your iquiry, Wun Pteasad w Quote Oa follows: (If the detalle "have furnished era not w1f Iclant. pleem wire or phone o that rre MV ape you.1 YOUR INQUIRY ITEM QUANTITY MOOELORPARr NO. DESCRIPTION PRICE. UNIT EXTENDEO 1 1 Model VRG330U, Cade G Waukesha Engine, 4 cycle, 6 cylinder, in-line, 3.875 x 4.665" (118 tom) bare and stroke, 330 cubic Inch displacement, (5.4 liters), approximately 1360 lbs. (617 kg) unit dry weight, 107 81iP intermittent of 2200 RPM, counterclockwise rotation'whcn facing flywheel, With the following: 1190 Enclosure-Shuet metal for closed unit includes front enclosure, roof, rear louvered panel and core guard. Requires air cleaner conversion Code 1192 for gasoline or Code 1193 for natural gas engines. 1190A Two doors for enclosure. 1193 Air cleaner conversion for closed power unit -Natural gas engines. Includes tvo-stage cleaner and connections. 2001 Carburetor! -Natural gas, with gas regulator, in place of standard. Gas inlet pressure 5 PSI minimum and 12 PSI maximum. Regulator is shipped 'loose. 3344 Magneto Ignition-Altronte V low tension capacitor discharge, flange mounted. 6003 Safety Swltchas-Low lube oil pressure and high water temperature shutdown. For models with magneto ignition. 7300 Muffler -Exhaust with rain cap. In place of straight pipe. 6021 Clutch Power Take -off -SAE 11.5 inch (292 mn)" single plate sintered Lron ovarcenter type, 2.25 inch (57 em) diameter x 6.5 inch (165 mm) long shaft. 2003A LPG Equipment -Includes converter, filter, manual shutoff valve and carburetor. NEI' TRICE: $10,500.00 ►Rcpt, of lost m$n f6t ,t414u0ta1 Mm l o JMfte, Aa lnarw,w0,a-aft In menufw hila'Quelled Pik wlrlr l0 aallvwv tha11 Ofett a fel1M00Pdlry aCY,tmonl 1,. Ina :Dove W Me, This 1.6101011 tuvwe the Tarp ld NIe1V " daea.l11ed hwaln end 1, nal a lob 11001141, of".@ rwlel vow, a1w11111a1Mno and any addenouma to .l` 10w1/IC 11t le ne .0.1ne1 OY, O,Nat1 um de1p len. All of the aMYIW a P.M.O,M. Ia 10ahlo, pus.0.1 end IwIrWIM,W we Iklute a la norm Or avNll dr MIh tlonderd 60m,nwe181 rnodedo. It anV 60ed181 1"lue, paoao0l„0, InstrWlMnel 111watwo, same or Nevhlening Ila. of ►11nt, e,a ,Nulled, adNao us ae Inal wa den 11.611 aaW,elHV 11,1 au0h Nam ESTIMATED TIME OF ENIPMENTI P,O.S.t freight allowed to Job site. TERMS: Net On receipt of invoice. OOWatWt It � _ fi Melfw _ THE FOREOOINO 12 A QUOTATION ONLY. FOR CONTRACT OONOITIDIIE SSS SVSRSE SIDE. Waukesha 6":ice WAUKESHA ENGINE DIVISION DRESSER INDUSTRIES INC. WAUKESHA. WISCONSIN 93187 is M. 4 cycle. 6 cylinder. in-line 1 Dole and stroke — 3 875" (98 mm) x 4 665" (118 mm) O'splacement — 330 cubic Inch (5.4 liters) Dry weigh) (unit) — appro.lmately 1360 lbs. (817 tg) Horsepower — 107 BHP intermillant Cc 2200 RPM Rotation — counterclockwise whon facing flywheel i e 1lcavy duty, deep skirted a Replaceable, pieeisinn type crankcase main and rod bearings e Centrifugally cast, replace- a Overhead valves with re. able wet cylinder linersplaccablc seals and guides • Forged steel, dynamically a Exhaust valve sent inserts balanced and counter- and rotators weighted crcnkshoft • Aluminum alloy. 3 ring with hardened journcls pistons with hurl Ilealinn e Forgcd steel C.nneetinu pins rods • Gcar driven mechanical • • Four camshaft bushingsgovernor • Seven main bearings •Full pressure lubrication system Soldered typo radiator, rated 1000F (38oC) ambient, mounting brackets, hose connections and 20 In. (500 mm) diameter suction tan with guard; adjustable fan bracket Water pump and lheimostat Rear mounted instrument panel with water temperature and oil pressure gauges, ammeter, starter switch, ignition switch, choke control and throttle control Updralt carburetor for gasoline fuel Gear type lube oil pump and full flow oil filter Intake and exhaust manifolds, oxhaust pile and rain tap Lifting ayes — front and rear Flywheel with ring gear• machined for 11.5" 11202 mml overcrm er clutch with 2.03" 172 mm) O.O. pilot bearing SAE No. 3 flywheel housing Governor and linkage 12 volt distributor with wchoneus drive• coil• spark plug, and cable Motorola 12V, 00 amp. alternator, mfg. and drive 12 volt starter Fuel tuppty Pump (Irv, single slope rat type air cleaner Four groove cianksha t pulley (ono accessory drive groove) COTZ7 L a 1,0 4Ill''�•J'' 10. .lj114 it iTi1 . ialm �l, It Lek,' I J Ail—vo ratings inclusio do]uLVen for engino water pump, lubo sheet mural enclosure Delco Army 12V, 42 amp, alternator 20" (608 mm) diameter pusher tan Radiator core guard c.l pump. n'!crralur,'0Iry h fan and n'r dearer. Pcr!ufmnco ?,',I n33 CCireLtcd to Bag' (152 m) at;ltudo. 0.313" (740 nun) Beit tlphtenrr g eclal Ilywhrcls Bell and pulley guards f Fl, !M tcrnrcratulo (.1 051F (:`0°C). Acer tory drive up to 40 HP High tension or breakerless icml low tendon magneto Ali prnlel hri wt:mgl of the C:ouke.h3 Engine U:v:elon cra a ) take off (not availat;o ignition rrn-ed f;11'0'3t'r dInozd mm3 of CPpolcabont.Othi'l 1,11!1193 v.111 nu;lneto ipnptirntl Muffler with rain rap ncp-rJiclo3dapplleaConsz1onvaiiabloUpon rntu.st. I Qilololer Anti4lesehnggasoline of 1<'If. ; �fr1A \ Yachomatcr with diivocah'n, 12V hour rnatrl, oil prmstwi and water tem. shut-off valve • solenoid operated ,,till) t 1 liciatmo safety shutdaw'rl Clutch power take off ^rr,.gp:a4;.aat.�n•Z"S for ra[h 1030'(70;1 m) arato 500' switd,n Six graovactanklholt pullov Carburetorandregulator for natural r.;dLIwoona Kat_rcat1110rF(6°C)ovcr0511'(:l°C). Ithraa accessory drive gas II0L6 Proluno carburetor 1 l:lni�;7�}IlY.1..11�1'.� 10 C.ILh 1000('05 fit) aWvo ICr00' _ groove{) acid Nuipmant (4-;7 m) all tudo oral 1�.J lot ea'h 10°� ([1•C) over 10 *P Dry. ova,ta3n air chance, Cannon ratrptnelo (XC), Deltic t neer h ambient Air starter Yfr 0 five. th / Tho manuhl-turn resclvcs the right to Mango or modify, without notice, the deign, equipment spoelllwtiorn or ratings ¢ II rein cel fin th Without incurring any obligation elth -r with respect to engines previously cold torn e%crm where otherwise 61>cr111cslly guoranter4 by the manufacr or In the process of contruc I' L Council Agenda - 6/25/84 11. Consideration of a Resolution Adopting a Punch Card voting System Plan. (T.E.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Several months ago you authorized the purchase of the equipment for punch card voting and automated counting for elections. One of the steps required to convert to an automated election System is to submit an approved plan to the Secretary of State and a copy of the minutes where the Council authorizes the use of that equipment. Apparently, to the Secretary of State, authorizing the purchase of the equipment is not the same as authorizing the use of that equipment. Thus, I am presenting you with a resolution for adoption stating that you approve the conversion to electronic voting systems. There are no realistic alternative actions, nor is there a staff recommendation. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the resolution. Copy of the Punch Card Voting System Plan. - 16 - CITY OF MONTICELLO. MINNESOTA PUNCH CMD VOTING SYSTEM PLAN Pollinq Place - one precinct 1) Monticello City Hall, Council Chambers 250 East Broadway Monticello, Minnesota 55362 2) Thirteen (13) voting stations-, at least one of which shall be suitable for wheelchair bound voters. (Ratio of one station per 135 registered voters.) 3) Thirteen (13) Model IV Vote Recorders.• • facilities purchased from E.L. Marketing, 1984. Counting Center , 1) Counting will occur in the Monticello City Hall Council Chambers, 250 East Broadway, Monticello, MN 55362, upon the closing of the polls. Monticello has only one precinct, hence no ballot transfer case is required. 1 2) Counting time and use of the PEPS unit ehala be exclusively reserved for the City of Monticello, Minnesota. 3) At least one week prior to any primary or general election, notice shall be published in the Monticello Times stating the exact location of the counting center and that the center shall be open to the public. 4) Counting Unit - Precinct Election Processing System (PEPS unit) supplied by E.L. Marketing (description card attached). 5) Back-up Counting Unit - E.L. Marketing Election Judges and Procedure 1) Judges shall be eoloctod from a list provided by the County Auditor and each major political party shall be represented equally. 2) Judges shall be trained by the County Election Supervisor from the office of the County Auditor. The City Clark may provide supplemental training and may appoint other personnel Inot judges) to assist In the conduct of the election. C� City of Monticello, Minnesota Punch Card Voting System Plan 3) A demonstrator unit of the Model IV Vote Recorder shell be available to assist voters in understanding proper vote recording procedures. 4) The City Clerk or a personal representative shall be present in the polling place throughout the entire conduct of voting. 5) Ballot labels and counting program shall be prepared and certified by E.L. Marketing. Countinq Judges and Procedure 1) After a minimum of two (2) days notice announcing that a public accuracy teat will be conducted, said teat shall be conducted under the observation of two election judges, each from different political parties, who shell attest certification. This test shall be conducted within five (5) days of the election and shall be repeated on election night prior to the start of ballot counting. 2) Two judges not of the same party shall be appointed to be present at the counting cantor and to observe the counting throughout the counting procedure. 3) The City Clerk or a personal representative shell be present in the counting center and in control throughout the entire counting proceedings. 4) Judges shall record all data from PEPS Unit, plus all data relating to absentee ballots, defoctive ballots, writo-in votes, otc., on proper tally shoots. 5) The City Clerk shall maintain, in a permanent fila. all records, road -out tapes and other pertinent data relatod to the election. - 2 - City of Monticello, Minnesota Punch Card Voting System Plan General At least five (5) days prior to an election, the 1) City Clark shall submit to the Office of the Secretary of State two (2) samples of each of the following: a) ballots b) ballot cards c) ballot envelopes 2) Sufficient paper ballots shall be prepared and available. 3) Ballot cards shall contain an identification of the precinct for which they are prepared. 4) Two sots of sample ballots with candidates names listed in alphabetical order shall be posted In the precinct. C -] RESOLUTION 1984 q_ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE USE OF ELECTRONIC VOTING SYSTEMS AND ADOPTING A PUNCH CARD VOTING SYSTEM PLAN WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statute 206.02, Subdivision 1, the governing body of any municipality may provide for the use of voting machines in any une or more precincts thereof, and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council of the City of Monticello to convert from paper ballot elections to electronic voting systems, and WHEREAS, a punch card voting system plan has been prepared and submitted (a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit AI. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, THAT: 1. Tho Punch Card Voting System Plan is hereby adopted. 2. Commencing with the primary ulection in 1984, the City of Monticello shall utilize a punch card voting system and electronic counting system in the conduct of all elections. 3. The City Administrator/Clark is hereby directed to submit to the Office of the Secretary of State all information and documentation as may hereafter be required. Adopted this 25th day of Juno, 1904. Thomas A. Eidom City Administrator C Arve A. Grimam0, Mayor 0/1 Council Agenda - 6/25/84 12. Consideration of the 1983 Auditor Report. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Mr. Rick Borden and Kim Lillehaug of Gruys Johnson 6 Associates will be present to discuss and review the 1983 Audit Report for the City and to answer and questions you may have. We just received the completed reports on Thursday morning and realize this is a relatively short time for yon to review prior to the meeting. Normally, we would deliver the Audits a week or two prior to the Council meeting, but the Council should review and accept the Audit prior to June 30, 1984, as required by the State Auditor. If, at a later date, you have additional questions concerning the Audit and the financial operations of the City for 1983, we can certainly invite the Auditors to return for a more prolonged discussion. Also, fool free to contact me before or after the meeting regarding any questions you may have. D. SUPPORTING DATA: 1983 Audit Report C - 17 - GENERAL FUND - JUNE - 1984 AMOUNT VOID -0- Comfort Craft Company - Repair furnace at City Hall 130.00 Gordon Link - Reimb. on rezoning request -(withdrawn) 75.00 Paul A. Laurence - Final payment on WWTP Step III contract 103,354.00 MN. State Treasurer - Dep.•Reg. reports 380.00 OSM - Eng. fees - April 324.33 Willard Farnick - Travel expense to seminars 36.00 Duluth Visitors 6 Convention Bureau - Reg. - T. Eidem 40.00 John Simola - Rental of air blower 75.00 Gwen Bateman - Animal control - May 666.00 Corrow Sanitation - Contract payment - May 4,546.50 Jerry Hermes - Janitorial services at Library 137.50 State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll W/H 125.04 MN. State Treasurer - Para W/H 1,525.19 Commissioner of Revenue - State W/H 2,668.00 Wright County State Bank - Fed. W/H 4,748.00 State Treasurer - Social Sec. W/H 3,111.64 Fulfillment Systems. Inc. - HRA investment 130,000.00 James Preusse - Cleaning city hall 275.00 YMCA of Mpls. - Monthly contract payment 312.50 Mr. Arve Grimsmo - Mayor salary 175.00 Mr. Dan Blonigen - Council salary 125.00 Mrs. Fran Fair - Council salary 125.00 Mr. Ken Maus - Council salary 125.00 Mr. Jack Maxwell - Council Salary 125.00 Wright County State Bank - Interest payment on Blk. 51 property 2,275.00 U. S. Postmaster - Postage stamps 200.00 Mrs. Lucy Andrews - inf. Center salary 103.50 Roadway Express, Inc. - Freight charges for 30 ton press 100.40 MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees 362.00 Monticello Dep. Reg. 42 - Fees on 75 pick-up sold to S. Vollmer 24.75 Publicorp, Inc. - Reg. fee - T. Eidem - seminar 125.00 Petty Cash-.Roimb. petty cash fund 44.24 MN. State Treasurer - Para W/H 485.37 Jerry Hermes - Janitorial at Library 137.50 Tom Eidem - Mileage 300.00 Knox Lumber - Park supplies 619.97 MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees 108.00 State Treasurer - Social Sec. W/H 2,423.08 State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll W/H 125.04 Tom Eidem - Roimb. conf. at Duluth - League Convention 204.25 N. S. Power - utilities 8,043.52 North Central Public Service - Utilities 1,536.40 MN. Pollution Control Agency - Reg. fee for Hoffman 6 Moyer sem. 90.00 State Treasurer - Para W/H 1,533.06 Wright County State Bank - investments 75,000.00 Wright County State Bank - Investments 325,000.00 Security Federal - Investments 25,000.00 Monticello Piro Dept. - Salary thru Juno 16 606.00 General Safety Equipment - Fire truck repair 168.75 Moon Motors - Park equip. repair 329.90 Sherburne County Equipment - Gate valve, bolt, filter, repairs 249.27, Neenah Foundry - Manholes 364.48 Joe's Precast - Manhole- 4th St. sower extension 431.87 Water Products - Motor - Const. 5 apt. - (roimb.) 422.28 Northstar Waterworks - Motors 366.64 ��•Fylo Backhoe 6 Sower Service - Latrine rental 6 digging - pumpher. 475.00 C GENERAL FUND AMOUNT Osseo Engine Rebuilders - Compressor repair 21.00 Metcalf 6 Larson - Ramp payment - new office building 175.00 EL Marketing - Voting machines 6 supplies 6,784.93 College Film Center - Toxic Hazards in Ind. 6 Poisoning films 70.08 American Legion Post #260 - Flags 190.10 Orkin Pest Control - Pest control at WWTP 477.00 Coolen Bros. - Tree removal 250.00 First Trust St. Paul - Initial fee for F.S.I. tax increment bonds 400.00 Holmes 6 Graven - Fee for Tax Increment - $155,000 G. Obl. 1,675.00 Howard Dahlgren Assoc. - May billing 476.40 Foster Franzen Agency - 84 Dodge pick-up ins. 291.00 Rick Wolfsteller - Reimb. for seminar in Duluth 181.50 Our Own Hardware - Waders, floodlights, gloves, pulleys, rope. 630.75 Maus Tire Service - Tires - for truck 140.00 Mobil Oil Corp. - Gas - Water 6 Fire Depts. 90.32 Gordon Link - Gas - St. Dept. 404.59 MN. Valley Testing - Sludge 6 soil testing 117.20 National Bushing Co. - Filters, battery charger, seat cover, 269.20 Leef Bros. - Uniform rental 149.00 Wright County Highway Dept. - Cold mix 60.00 Harry's Auto Supply - Battery.seal beam,filters (air) 345.72 Ziegler, Inc. - Oil testing WWTP 109.79 Electronic Center - Supplies for WWTP 15.69 Midwest Computer Services - Repair Compute) at WWTP 64.13 Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk 6 Co. - Sewer supplies for Par West 44.38 Coast to Coast - Gloves, screws, sprinkler, gas can, shovel,atc. 331.96 Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone 956.90 AME Ready Mix - Cement for park 43.66 Geyer Rental Service - Rental of truck 6 trailer for Par West 286.00 Davis Water Equipment - Par West supplies 53.10 Independent Lumber - Misc. supplies 34.41 int. Conference of Bldg. officials - Membership dues - Anderson 60.00 First Bank Mpls. - Public fund charge 4.00 Wright County Sheriff Dept. - Contract payment - May 9,494.38 Zep Mfg. - wwrp supplies 123.67 National Chemsearch - Mend -con - St. supplies 189.98 Century Laboratories - Cleaning supplies - WWTP 247.69 Scenic Sign Corp. - Letters for Library 834.17 Rock Bottom Rebuilders - WWTP supplies 30.00 Phillips Petroleum - Gas - WWTP 6 Water Dept. 29.03 Marco Business Products - Office supplies 75.73 Al Nelson - Sub. 11.70 Maus Foods - Misc. supplies - Library, WWTP, City Hall, Mtco. 52.02 Monticello Printing - Misc. printing 172.05 Hoglund Bus Co. - Oil gauge 27.30 Fair's Garden Center - 3 replacement tress at Wrightco 375.00 Fire Inst. Assn. of MN. - Fire Dept. supplies 21.09 Central McGowan, Inc. - Cyl. rental 6 acetylene 30.38 Contra Sots - 3 gal. Round -Up for Parks 246.06 Clutch 6 U -Joint - Plate, seal kit, cylinder 156.96 Northwestern Doll - Fire phone 38.97 Banker's Life - Group ins. 3,887.78 Local #49 - Union duos 126.00 Adams Past Control - Library past control 38.20 National Life Insurance - T. Eidem ins. 100.00 GENERAL FUND AMOUNT CHECK NO. Mrs. Marjorie Goetzke - O.A.A.Board meetings 107.50 19058 Mr. TOM Salkowski - O.A.A. Board meetings 100.00 19059 Arve Grimsmo - O.A.A. Board meetings 60.00 19060 LeRoy Engstrom - O.A.A. Board meetings 110.40 19061 Franklin Denn - O.A.A. Board meetings 60.00 19062 AT & T Information Systems - Fire phone charges 3.42 19063 Smith, Pringle.& Hayes - Legal fees - Feb. thru May 1,117.00 19064 Allen Pelvit - June mileage 17.78 19065 Monticello O. K. Hardware - Gloves, Weed -B -Gone, cable, etc. 72.35 19066 Mrs. Lucy Andrews - Inf. Center salary 87.75 19067 Mrs. Janette Leerssen - Inf. Center salary 133.88 19068 MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees 121.00 19069 MN. State Treasurer - Dep. REg. fees 51.50 19070 Dr. Joel Erickson - Animal control from Dec. - 83 to May - 84 450.00 19071 Feed Rite Control - 100N feed rite 05 & sample 938.50 19072 Midwest Siren Service - Annual mtce. of sirens - Civil Defense 400.00 19073 Gary Anderson - Mileage - June 81.62 19074 North Star Waterworks Products - 4th St. sewer extensions exp. 1,352.51 19075 W. W. Grainger - Pumphoum addition expense 76.45 19076 Payroll for May $30,298.99 TOTAL GENERAL DISBURSEMENTS -- JUNE $769,614.59 C LIQU�-:, FUND AMOUNT CHECK ` LIQUOR DISBURSEMENTS FOR JUNE NO. Ed Phillips s Sons - Liquor 1,987.31 11243 State Capitol Credit Union - W/11 _ 20.00 11244 MN. State Treasurer - Pera W/11 166.91 11245 Commissioner of Revenue - State w/ii taxes 252.00 11246 Wright County State Bank - FWP taxes 485.30 11247 State Treasurer - Social Sec. Fund 367.87 11248 Wright County State Bank - investments 90,000.00 11249 Eagle Wine Co. - Wine purchases 331.67 11250 Griggs, Cooper 6 Co. - Liquor 2,721.85 11251 National Child Safety Council - Child Safety program 50.00 11252 Wright County State Bank - Investments 50,003.00 11253 MN. State Treasurer - Pera W/11 88.18 11254 Twin City Wine Co. - Liquor 1,734.32 11255 Ed Phillips 6 Sons - Liquor 4,821.44 11256 State Treasurer - Social Sec. Fund 262.22 11257 State Capital Credit Union - Payroll W/11 20.00 11258 Eagle Wino Co. - Wine 47.19 11259 Griggs, Cooper & Co. - Liquor 2,696.84 11260 North Central Public Service - Utilities 59.58 11261 Northern States Power - Utilities 467.62 11262 State Treasurer - PRRA W/11 181.83 11263 Commissioner of Revenue - Est. June sales tax 3,460.00 11264 Ccasaissioner of Revenue - May liquor sales tax 6,872.40 11265 Our Own Hardware - Screws 3.30 11266 Bernick's Pepsi Cola - Misc. adse. 466.45 11267 Grosslein Beverage - near 1.1,313.15 11268 Dick Beverage - Beer 4,640.70 11269 Dahlhoimer Dist. Co. - Baer 14,347.32 11270 Schabal Beverage - Beer 2,959.80 11271 Day Dist. Co. - Boar 873.65 11272 Thorpe Dist. Co. - Bear 4,724.85 11273 Slifka Sales - Misc. Mdse. 25.37 11274 7 Up Bottling - Misc. odea. 317.10 11275 Viking Coca Cola - Mise. Wee. 325.15 11276 Old Dutch Foods, Inc. - Misc. adse. 270.90 11277 Jude Candy b Tobacco - Misc. adse. 743.73 11278 Irrvegren Ice - Iee purchase 157.50 11279 Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone 49.40 11280 Yonak Sanitation - Contract 82.50 11281 Maus roads - Store expense 36.07 11282 Rankar'a Life Ins. - Group Ins. 361.26 11203 1.eifert Trucking - Freight 344.44 11204 Payroll for May 4.756.44 TOTAL LIQUOR DIDDURSHNNNTS - JUNE $213,897.41 INDIVIDUAL PERMIT ACTIVITY REPORT MONTH OF MAY , 1984 FFFI: SURCHARGE PLUMBING SURCHARGE $ 3.00 Charge Charge 16.15 , 9.00 I $ 21.00 $ .50 Charge ! 6.00 2.50 1.50 Charge 2.50 23.45 23.00 .50' 21.15 23.00 .50 e.15 i .50 6.75 3.00 ! 2.50 .75 2.50 $109.40 $67.00 $1.50 ! I � +j °ERMIT YUMBER DESCRIPTION P NAME/LOCATION (VALUATION PERMIT 84-617 Detached Garage RGIGary Shonyo/204 Wright Street $ 6,000.00 $ 56.60 84-621 Reshingle Part of House AD'Dick Brooks/607 West Broadway No 84-622 Reroof Part 2nd Floor AC Wrightco Products, Inc./206 W. 4th St. No Office Roof 84-623 Addition to New Convenient AC Samuel Properties s Const/1200 Hwy.255. 32,300.00 203.35 I store 84-624 Pump House Additions AE,City of Monticello/136 E. Broadway ani 17,995.00 128.47 Cedar St. I1209 84-625 Removal 6 Replacement AD!David Munson/510 Elm Street No Garage Roof i j ' 84-626 House Addition ,AD;David 1dunson/510 Elm Street ! 12,000.00 I 92.50 84-627 Detached Garage RG, Matt Theisen/156 Hedman Lane ! 5,000.00 50.50 84-628 Demolish Existing House D IMonticello/Big lake Hosp/1003 Hart B1Jd. IAC!Hoglund I 10.00 84-629 Bus Garage Addition Bus Co/116 East Oakwood Dr. 3,000.00 38.50 84-630 P.eshingle Part of House IAD'Donald Anundsen/501 W. Broadway No 84-631 Interior Building Remodel ,AC Conrad Johnson/142 W. Broadway j 5,000.00 ! 50.50 84-632 Single Family Dwelling :SF Quintin Lanners/737 W. Broadway 46,900.00 269.05 84-633 Single Family Dwelling SF;Marvin George Builders/34 Fairway Dr. l 42,300.00 248.35 84-634 84-635 House Addition Accessory Building ADl Robert Iagergren/726 W. Broadway ADI'Leo Mazer/18 Eagle Circle I 16,300.00 1,000.00 118.30 10.00 84-636 Cold Storage Building Al1 Best in Webb/114 Thomas Park Drive 13,500.00 101.50 84-637 1 Detached Garage f RG,Wettestad/425 W. 4th St. 6,000.00 56.50 '84-63B I Attached Garage RG Kenneth Relander/305 Prairie Road 5,000.00 50.50 84-592 Basement Remodel AD!Peter Palmisano/130 Marvin Elwood Road 1,500.00 15.00 84-639 Detached Garage RG:Richard Kolb/1124 Sandy Lane , I 5,000.00 50.50 { T%nAL.S $218,795.00 $1,550.02 PLAN CHECKING B4-624 Pump House Additions AC City of Monticello/136 E. Broadway 6 $ 83.51 I 209 Cedar St. TOTAL REVENUE $ 1,811.43 FFFI: SURCHARGE PLUMBING SURCHARGE $ 3.00 Charge Charge 16.15 , 9.00 I $ 21.00 $ .50 Charge ! 6.00 2.50 1.50 Charge 2.50 23.45 23.00 .50' 21.15 23.00 .50 e.15 i .50 6.75 3.00 ! 2.50 .75 2.50 $109.40 $67.00 $1.50 ! I � +j CITY OF MONTICELLO Monthly Building Department Report PERMITS _end USES Month of MAY 19 84 Last Thio "Same Month Last Year 'This Year PERMITS ISSUED Month April Month Mav Last Year To Date To Date RESIDIIITIAL Number 16 14 4 23 43 Valuation $ 387,000.00 $ 147,000.00 $ 48,939.50 $ 1,345,807.50 $ 1,657,500.00 Fees 2,358.55 1,017.70 329.02 5,732.63 8,884.71 Surcharges 193.50 73.50 24.47 670.57 818.65 0OMMERCIAL Number 2 5 2 9 16 ; Valuation 399,200.00 58,295.00 199,000.00 611,925.00 719,195.00 1 Fees 2,249.71 504.33 1,193.58 2,727.66 4,709.59 i Surcharges 199.45 29.15 99.50 305.85 359.45 i INDUSTRIAL Number 1 1 1 2 1 Valuation 720,000.00 13,500.00 500,000.00 733,500.00 Fees 3,271.95 101.50 1,197.45 3,373.45 Surcharges 360.00 6.75 250.00 366.75 12 3 5 12 25 �!lumber F$aa 453.00 67.00 242.00 435.00 901.50 Surcharges 6.00 1.50 2.50 7.50 12.50 YnT RS Number 1 2 4 1 i Valuation 91000.00 16,420.00 Fees 10.00 84.50 234.50 10.00 Surcharges 4.50 6.00 TOTAL NO. PERMITS 31 24 13 49 87 TOTAL VALUATION 1,506,200.00 218,795.00 256,939.50 2,474,152.50 3,108,195.00 TOTAL, FEES 8,333.21 1,700.53 1,849.10 4,622.48 17,879.2 5 TOTAL SURCHARGES 75R"95 110SQ ll>4�] 1.710 07 1 3 CURRENT MDIi1i{ R� Number to Date iPMRMIIT NATURE Number PERM T �jg(�ggg, Valuation This year Last year! Single Family 2 $ 517.40 $ 44.60 $ 69,200.00 15 10 Duplex 1 a j Multi-fomlly 1 3 Commercial 5 8 Industrial 1 101.50 6.75 13,500.00 2 1 i 1' Res. Garages (sJl ;Igne 5 260.50 13.50 27,000.00 11 0 4 2 Public Buildings 1 211.98 9.00 17,995.00 1 0 I (ALTERATION OR REPAIR Wollinge 7 235.80 15.40 30,800.00 15 4 Commercial 4 292.35 20.15 40,300.00 10 1 I Industrial 0 0 I PLUMiB11:C All typos 3 67.00 1.50 25 12 IACCESSORY STRUCTURES i Swimming Pooln 0 1 Docks 0 2 TEMPORARY PCHMIT , DEMOLITION 1 10.00 1 1 TOTALS 24 1,700.53 110.90 218,795 00 87 49