City Council Agenda Packet 01-25-1988AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Monday, January 25, 1988 - 7:30 p.m.
t
Mayor: Arve A. Grimsmo
Council Members: Fran Fair, Bill Fair, Warren Smith, Dan Blonigen
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held January 11, 1988.
3. Citizens Comrnents/Pet it ions, Requests, and Complaints.
4. Consideration of Conditional Use Request to Allow outdoor Sales in a B-3
(Highway Business) Zone. Applicant, Monticello Housing and RV Center,
Inc.
S. Consideration of Preliminary Plat Review, Ritze Manor fid Addition.
Applicant, Charles Ritze.
6. Consideration of Resolution Accepting Bid and Authorizing the Execution
of a Contract for Construction of a New Well.
7. Consideration of Authorizing Purchase of Portable Pure for Civil Defense.
8. Consideration of Appointment to Planning Commission.
9. Consideration of Bills for the Month of January.
10. Adjournment.
C
L
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, January 11, 1988 - 7:30 p.m.
Members Present: Arve Grimsmo, Fran Fair, Bill Fair, Dan Blonigen,
Warren Smith
Members Absent: None
2. Approval of Minutes.
Motion was made by Bill Fair, seconded by Warren Smith, and unanimously
carried to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held December 14,
1987.
4. Public Hearing on Downtown Streetscape Improvement.
Mr. Geoff Martin of Consulting Planner, Dahlgren, Shardlow 6 Uban, Inc.,
presented for the Council and the public a brief overview of the
proposed Monticello Downtown Rehabilitation Program known as the
Streetscape Plan. Mr. Martin noted that a ten block area between Linn
Street on the west and Palm Street on the east and River Street to the
north and Third Street to the south was considered the project area with
main emphasis being on improvements to sidewalk, lighting, and plantings
on Broadway and Pine Streets. The first phase of the proposed
improvement would include landscaping and improvements to the public
parking lots in the downtown area, and the total cost was estimated at
$640,000 with previous Council indication that approximately 20 percent
or $130,688 would be assessed to the benefiting property owners. The
project has been considered for a number of years and has recently been
redesigned with input from a volunteer committee consisting of downtown
business owners and tenants.
After the brief presentation was completed, the public hearing was
opened for comments. Mr. Leo Stokes expressed concern over the lost
parking spaces that would result in the project designing of nodes in
each block. Overall, he felt the project was too costly for the
benefits received and that this type of public money should be spent on
something else to improve the city.
Jenny Hoglund questioned whether the tree plantings along Highway 25 and
Broadway would project into traffic lanes which may be a hindrance to
bus traffic. It was noted by the planner that typically the trees are
pruned and would not cause a problem with traffic. Ms. Hoglund also
felt this large of an expenditure for improvements should not be
directed only to the downtown area but that other areas of the city need
improvements such as sidewalks and street lighting, especially along
Oakwood Drive which is becoming more populated with pedestrian traffic.
9
t
Council Minutes - 1/11/88
Mr. John Novak, owner of Big John's Bait, believed that the plantings
and tree grates will only provide a place for garbage to accumulate and
was also opposed to the nodes being designed which would take up much
needed parking spaces along Broadway. In his opinion, maintenance cost
for such items as snow removal, sweeping, and upkeep of the plantings
will become a high cost for the City.
Property owner, Lawrence Clausen, on West Broadway indicated opposition
to the project in front of his property, as it is primarily residential
in nature, and he didn't feel it would receive the same benefit as other
commercial property in the area. He also questioned the idea of park
benches being added along Broadway, as he feels it would cause a problem
with loitering and the current problem with cruising.
Property owner, Al Loch, noted that in his discussions with Mr. Muller,
who owns the theatre, he was in favor of the nodes being established
along Broadway especially in front of his establishment. Mr. Loch felt
the downtown area needs improvements for business to compete and survive
and that the project will be of benefit to all citizens if it enables
the retail and commercial activities to thrive in Monticello. Mr. Loch
also noted that if this particular plan is not constructed, in the near
future most of the property owners will have to replace sidewalks
anyway. He was definitely in support of the project and felt the small
cost to the average homeowner would only be in the range of 53 to $10
per year under the present assessment formula.
Ms. Audrey Ross of the Comfort Inn expressed concerns over this type of
a project being placed primarily on ad valorem taxes when they had to do
their own landscaping when they developed their motel site.
Mr. Doug Pitt emphasized for the Council that the general public will be
responsible for most of the cost of this improvement and shouldn't be
done without their approval. Mr. Pitt noted that other business owners
who have developed in recent years outside of the downtown area have
paid their own way and didn't ask for taxpayers help for landscaping,
etc., and he felt the downtown business owners should likewise be
responsible for more of the cost of the project.
Mr. Jim Metcalf, speaking for himself and property owner, Stan Douglas,
opposed the project because of the cost involved and felt the project
was too large and costly for what benefits will be received by the
property owners. Mr. Ceorge Liefert and Scott Douglas both indicated
that some of the proposed curbing and landscaping treatments may hinder
freight delivery service to the downtown area and more study is needed
to make sure more problems aren't created.
0
Council Minutes - 1/11/88
Sally Martie and Joyce Dowling both indicated that a beautification
program such as this is needed to make the City of Monticello look nice
and to make people proud of Monticello, as the first impression of many
people coming into town is the downtown area. In addition, they noted
that it's been 20-25 years since any type of renovation has occurred in
the downtown area, and it's time to move ahead or the downtown will
eventually die.
Marn Flicker also indicated his support for the improvement concept, as
he felt it was time to change and renovate the downtown area to provide
a good image for the entire city.
Mr. John Roppy questioned how much of the public parking lot
improvements were being assessed to other property owners. It was his
opinion that the improvements would just add to the loitering problem
currently existing along Broadway and that the higher maintenance cost
for the City would not be warranted.
Mr. Doug Stokes felt the cost of the project was excessive for the
benefit that would be received and also didn't feel the taxpayers of the
city should have to pay for a majority of the improvements to the
downtown area. Mr. Stokes also questioned a possible conflict of
interest by some of the Council members who may have an interest in
property downtown with the assessment ratio only being proposed at
approximately 20 percent. Mr. Ren Larson indicated he wasn't convinced
that a streetecape project would attract more people to the business
community and that the payback to the property owners for the money
spent on such an improvement would never occur. In addition, he noted
that not all property owners in the downtown area were in favor of the
project even at the 20 percent assessment level. Mr. Cary Hammer
indicated support of a project concept but felt this particular design
was too expensive and should possibly be scaled down to reduce the
cost. Property owner, Reith Rjellberg, felt he was still paying for
parking lot improvements in the downtown area completed 12 or 13 years
ago and could not afford an additional expense for more improvements.
Mr. John Cossen and Mrs. Stelton of Stelton's Laundromat opposed the
project because of the cost. Mr. Vick Cohen felt the main issue is that
something should be done to the downtown area or the retail community
will eventually die if not renovated.
At this point, Mayor Crimsmo entered into the record letters submitted
by property owners in regards to the project. Mr. Kevin Fair of. Fair's
Carden Center opposed the project, as he felt it would not improve his
property. Mr. Steve Johnson supported the project because it would
enhance the business community and provide a quality image for
Monticello. Mr. Lawrence Clausen suggested the project terminate in
front of hie property, as it to currently residential in nature, and he
would not receive an equal benefit to other property owners.
t
Council Minute - 1/11/88
Mr. George Johnson of the Country Travel Store indicated support of the
project although he had some concerns over some of the design
specifications. Mr, and Mrs. Fred Vopel opposed the project due to the
enormous cost.
Hearing no further comments, motion was made by Bill Fair, seconded by
Warren Smith, and unanimously carried to close the public hearing.
6. Consideration of Resolution Ordering Improvement and Preparation of
Plans and Specifications on Streetseape Project.
After the close of the public hearing on the streetscape project, the
Council then deliberated whether the project should proceed as planned
or whether alterations should be made to the project design to reduce
its scope and cost. Councilmemher Bill Fair addressed the issue of a
possible conflict of interest and indicated he had no interest in any
property in the downtown area and dial not feel his voting on the issue
would be a problem. Mr. Fair felt the main issue is that some type of
improvement will eventually be necessary in the downtown area and that
the City has over the past number of: years done many projects which have
resulted in less than 100 percent assessments to the direct property
owner and felt this type of improvement is still a public improvement
which will enhance the entire community and, therefore, should be
partially picked up on ad valorem taxes if it does proceed.
Councilmember Blonigen felt that the project as proposed was too
expensive for both the property owners and the taxpayers of the city and
should be scaled down in design and cost.
Councilmember Fran Fair supported the concept of a downtown improvement
in that it to the Council's duty to do what's necessary to help preserve
downtown retail activity. Councilmember Warren Smith supported the idea
of improvements being warranted in the downtown area and noted that such
an improvement is an investment in the city as a whole. Mr. Smith did
note that he has some reservations about only 20 percent of the cost
being directly assessed and recommended that design changes may have to
be made to downscale the project, including elimination of the nodes
along Broadway and possibly elimination of public parking lot
improvements at this time. Mayor Crimsmo also agreed with the concept
of improving the downtown area for the benefit of the entire community.
lie also supported the idea of reviewing a scaled down version of the
project in an effort to lower the cost.
After further discussion, motion wasp made by Bill Fair, seconded by Fran
Fair, and unanisnusly carried to table any decision on the proposed
improvement project at this time until the February 8 Council meeting at
which time a revised design could be reviewed with a lower cost. in
addition, the Council would at that time review the proposed assessment
ratio for the project directly benefiting downtown property owners.
V
Council Minutes - 1/11/88
Public Hearing on Improvements to County Road 118, County Road 39, and
the water Systems.
Mr. Chuck Lepak, Consulting Engineer, reviewed with the Council and the
public the proposed improvements of sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm
sewer improvements for County Road 118 and County Road 39 to the
easterly end of the city limits. In addition, he reviewed the proposed
improvements to the water system, including a new deep well, pumphouse,
and appurtenant equipment. The project as proposed would extend
watermain from I-94 along County Road 118 and along the new realignment
of County Road 39 terminating at the east boundary of the city. The
estimated cost for the watermains was estimated at $316,500 with
approximately $167,000 being assessable to benefiting property owners.
Sewer extensions were proposed along East County Road 39 which would
include the construction of a lift station and force main totaling
$251,000. Storm sewer improvements along East County Road 39 would cost
$70,000 with $16,800 being assessable to benefiting property owners.
Other improvements proposed include $89,400 for a new well and $198,100
for a pumphouse.
Mr. Lepak noted that the area along East County Road 39 could be served
with a 10 -inch trunk sewer that would be capable of serving a total of
138 acres, some of which would be outside of the present city limits.
If it was decided to expand the area that could be served by this trunk
sewer system, it could be oversized to either a 12 -inch line which would
accommodate a 298 acre area, or to an 18 -inch trunk line that could
accommodate up to 868 future acres. The additional cost for oversizing
the line to accommodate future growth would add $12,300 or $26,800 to
the total sewer cost.
The engineers then briefly outlined a typical assessment for benefiting
property under this project. The estimated assessments for an 8 -inch
sanitary sewer would be $28.50 per foot, an 8 -inch watermain at $24.75
per foot, and those areas receiving storm sewer benefit at $22.35 per
foot. A typical lot along County Road 39 could have a $7,758 assessment
if it received sewer, water, and storm sewer benefits, whereas a
commercial lot that received water benefit only between County Road 75
and Mississippi Drive would be assessed approximately $28.00 per foot.
Consulting Engineer, John Badalich, also reviewed with the Council the
concept idea of also establishing an area assessment per acre for
sanitary sewer improvements and water improvements. Mr. Badalich noted
that improvement projects such as the one proposed for 39 will
eventually benefit a large area and that typically communities establish
an acre charge that is assessed to areas that will eventually benefit.
The Council noted that an area assessment formula will be considered in
the near future.
t'
Council Minutes - 1/11/88
The public hearing was then opened to the public and those benefited by
the proposed improvements, and no counts were received. As a result,
the hearing was closed.
7. Consideration of Resolution Ordering Improvement to the Water System,
County Road 118, and County Road 39, and Preparation of Plans and
Specifications.
After conclusion of the public hearing on the proposed improvements to
County Road 39, the water system and County Road 118, Council discussed
the merits of continuing the project. Councilmember Bill Fair noted
that in his opinion the City would be short sighted if it did not
consider the improvements at the present time since the County was in
the process of upgrading and realigning County Road 39. After further
discussion, motion was made by Bill Fair, seconded by Fran Fair, and
unanimously carried to adopt a resolution ordering the improvement to
the water system, County Road 118, and County Road 39 utility extension
and authorizing the preparation of plans and specifications for the
project to include alternates pertaining to the sanitary sewer pipe
size. See Resolution 88-1.
B. Consideration of Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications on
Phase I of the Water System Improvement and Ordering Advertisement for
Bios.
As part of the previous item, plans and specifications for the
construction of a deep well have been presented by the Consulting
Engineer, and it was recommended that this portion of the plans be
approved and ordered for advertising for bids.
Motion was made by Bill Fair, seconded by Dan Blonigen, and unanimously
carried to approve the resolution approving plans and specifications for
the new well and authorizing the Advertisement for Bids returnable
January 25, 1988. See Resolution 88-2.
9. Consideration of Ordinance Amendment Regulating Snowmobile Operations.
Council members reviewed proposed revisions to the snowmobile ordinance
for the city which primarily clarified the hours of operation and to
clearly state that snowmobile operations within the city limits for
recreational use will not be allowed. The ordinance revisions also
clarified that public parks are not available for snowmobile use and
that snowmobiles shall be operated only on street surfaces and not
within the boulevards or sidewalks for recreational uses. Operation of
snownnbiles shall be only for a direct access in and out of the city
from the owner's property.
Motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by Fran Fair, and unanimously
carried to adopt the ordinance amendment regulating snowmobile
operations as amended. See Ordinance Amendment No. 160.
0--;1-
Council Minutes - 1/11/88
10. Consideration of Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for Purchase of
Aerial Fire Truck.
On December 28, 1987, the Fire Department received three bids for a new
aerial fire truck as follows:
notal
Trade-in Total Price Outright
Bidder Allowance with Trade-in Bid
Suu-fin Corp. 8,500 $273,703 282,203
Clarey•s Safety Equip. $7,500 $281,000 $288,500
MN Conway Fire $7,500 $272,000 $279,500
The Fire Department Truck Committee has since reviewed the bids and
recommended that the truck be awarded to the low bidder, MN Conway Fire
Equipment, in the amount of $279,500 with the option to trade in the
1962 fire truck for a $7,500 credit. Financing of the purchase will be
determined by the Council at a later date for any amount needed above
the funds available from the fire hall construction account.
Motion was made by Dan Blonigen, seconded by Warren Smith, and
unanimously carried to accept the Fire Department recommendation and
award the bid for the new aerial ladder truck to MN Conway Fire
Equipment in the amount of $279,500 with the option to trade in the 1962
Chev for $7,500.
11. Consideration of Entering a 1988 Maintenance Agreement with Wright
County Highway Department.
The City of Monticello annually performs routine maintenance such as
snow and ice removal on certain portions of county state -aid highways
within the City of Monticello. The County reimburses cities for all
maintenance cost associated with county state -aid highways based on a
per mile cost. The total cost reimbursement expected for 1988 would
amount to $4,810.
Motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Warren Smith, and unanimously
carried to approve entering into the maintenance agreement with Wright
County on county state -aid highways.
12. Consideration of Adoeiting a Revised Schedule of Fees for Services,
Licenses, and Permits.
Annually, the City Council reviews the license and fee schedules for all
activities that require licenses, permits, and other fees. It was
recommended by the City Administrator that only minor changes be
implemented for 1988 consisting of 1} an increase in the Sunday Liquor
License fee from $100 to $200 to coincide with the statutory limit, and
2) increase the animal impoundment fees and fine schedule for animals.
It was recommended that the dog impoundment charge be $25 for the first
offense, $35 for the second offense, and $50 for the third offense or
v more as the fine and an additional $6.75 for every day the animal is
housed in the dog pound facility.
0
Council Minutes - 1/11/88
After review of the changes recommended, motion was made by Warren
Smith, seconded by Fran Fair, and unanimously carried to adopt the fee
schedule as proposed with the changes for the Sunday Liquor License fee
and the animal mound charges as recommended.
13. Consideration of Making Annual Appointments.
State Statutes require that at the first meeting of the new year,
certain appointments be made. The annual appointments required include
official depositories, official newspaper, Planning Commission
appointments, health officer, acting mayor, Library Board vacancies,
Housing and Redevelopment Authority vacancies, city attorney, city
planner, city auditor, and appointments to Community Education Advisory
Board, Joint Fire Board representative, and OAA Area Board
representative.
After review of the appointments needed, motion was made by Bill Fair,
seconded by Warren Smith, and unanimously carried to adopt the annual
appointments as follows:
official Depositories:
Newspaper:
Housing & Redevelopment
Authority:
(5 -year staggered terms)
Planning Commission:
(1 -year term)
Health officer:
0 year)
Acting mayor:
(1 year)
Joint commissions:
Community Education
Fire Board
r OAA
l
Wright County State Bank
Security Federal Savings b Loan
First National Bank of Monticello
Monticello Times
1. Ren Mau s
12/91
2. Ben Smith
12/90
3. Bud Schrupp
12/89
4. Al Larson
12/88
5. Everette Ellison
12/92
1. Richard Carlson
2. Joyce Dowling
3. Cindy Lem
4. Richard Martie
S. Jim Ridgeway
Dr. Donald Maus
Fran Fair
Warren Smith
Rick Wolfateller
Arve Crimsmo
8 0
I
Council Minutes - 1/11/88
Library Board: 1. Ed Solberg 12/90
(3 -year staggered) 2. Dr. Donald Maus 12/88
3. Mary Jane Punchochar 12/90
4. Pat Schwarz 12/88
5. Marguerite Pringle 12/89
Attorney: Smith, Pringle 6 Hayes
Planner: Dahlgren, Shardlow, a Uban
Auditor: Gruys Johnson
14. Consideration of Application to Renew a Gambling License - Applicant,
American Legion Club.
Previously, the American Legion Club has been granted a state license
for gambling activities pertaining to pull tab operations. The Legion
Club has requested renewal of the application before the State Gambling
Board and the City Council has an opportunity to oppose the renewal if
desired. If no action is taken by the Council, the Gambling Board will
renew the license.
By Council consensus, no objection was made to the license being
renewed.
15. Consideration of Report from PSG, Inc., on Odor Problems at WwPP.
Odor problems at the Monticello Wastewater Treatment Plant have become
more severe and frequent in the past months and representatives of PSG,
Inc., contractor operators of the facility, met with the Council to
outline the procedures they plan on implementing in an effort to reduce
the odor problem. The main areas they will be working on include the
elimination of the trickling filters, piping changes to the gravity
thickeners, and additional staff member. The proposed changes may
result in additional operating costs for electricity, which PSG at the
present time will absorb; but major changes, if necessary, will be
discussed at contract renegotiation time.
16. Consideration of Setting Special Meeting for Interviewing Assistant
Administrator Applicants.
By Council consensus, a special meeting will be held on Wednesday,
January 13, at 5:00 p.m., for the purpose of interviewing three
applicants for the Assistant Administrator position.
R c �.te�
City Administrator
9 0
council Agenda - 1/25/88
4. Consideration of Conditional Use Request to Allow Outdoor Sales in a B-3
(Highway Business) Zone. Applicant, Monticello Housing and Rv
Center, Inc. (G.A.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Mr. Ralph Hermes, owner of the Monticello Housing and RV Center, Inc.,
is proposing to create a sales lot on Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Commercial
Court Addition. On these lots Mr. Hermes would like to have parked
recreational motor homes and mobile homes for display.
In the enclosed supplement you will find the conditions for outdoor
sales in a B-3 (highway business) zone. Under condition number one,
outside sales can only take up 30 percent of the principal use of the
building. In Mr. Hermes' case, 30 percent of the principal use of his
portion of the building which he uses is approximately 600 sq ft.
Thirty percent (306) of this space in the building which Mr. Hermes has
for his business would accommodate only 18 sq ft of outdoor sales lot
area. Mr. Hermes is requesting to use the entire lot area on Lots 1 and
2 for his outdoor sales area. The percentage for the outside sales area
in relationship to its principal use would substantially increase the
30 percent maximum allowable outside sales area lot.
Under condition number two, outside sales areas are to be fenced or
screened from the view of neighboring residential uses or abutting any
R -zoning districts. In Mr. Hermes' case, we as the City staff feel
unless there is a definite objection from the public that Mr. Hermes not
have to install solid screening or fence in the outside sales area from
the view of the neighboring residential properties to the northeast of
Mr. Hermes' business building.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Approve the conditional use request to allow outdoor sales in a 8-3
(highway business) zone.
2. Deny the conditional use request to allow outdoor sales in a B-3
(highway business) zone.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
City staff recommends approval of Mr. Hermes' request to allow outdoor
sales in a B-3 (highway business) zone. We also recommend that
condition number one, the sales area, be increased approximately
1,750 percent to utilize the entire area of Lots 1 and 2 for the entire
sales area. We also feel under condition number two that Mr. Hermes
would not have to fence or screen the area abutting the view of the
neighboring residential properties.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the location of the request) Copy of the conditions under
Subsection P, Outdoor Sales.
-1-
•
IFj Open or outdoor service, sale and rental an
a principal or accessory use and including
•
sales in or from motorized vehicles, trailers
or wagons provided that:
1. Outside services, sales and equipment rental '
connected with the principal uses is limited
to thirty (30) percent of the gross floor,
area of the principal use. This percentage
may be increased as a condition of the
conditional use permit.
2. Outside sales areas are fenced or screened
from view of neighboring residential uses "
or abutting ^&- oistrict in compliance
with Chapter 3, Section 2 IGj of this Ordinance.
3. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed
- that the light source shall not be visible
from the public right-of-way or from neighboring
{
residences and shall be in Compliance with
' Ciapter 31 Section 2 I82 Of this Ordinance.
Sales area is grassed or surfaced to cons=ol
dust.
!. Dose not take up parking space as required
for conformity to this ordinance.
d. The provisions of Chapter 22 of this Ordinancs
are considered and satisfactorily met.
Council Agenda - 1/25/88
5. Consideration of Preliminarjy Plat Review, Ritze Manor 2nd Addition.
Applicant, Charles Ritze. (G.A.1
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Mr. Ritze's preliminary plat of Ritze Manor 2nd Addition has been
prepared in its entirety for its review. Mr. Ritze has run into a
stalemate with the adjoining property owner to the north, Mr. Reinhold
Yager, in obtaining additional easement of the road easement of Hilltop
Drive. For the platting of a residential lot in the City of Monticello,
the minimum residential lot width being 80 feet, the minimum lot frontage
a residential lot must have on an abutting public right-of-way is 2/3 of
the minimum lot width, or 53 feet of frontage on a public right-of-way.
As you will note on the enclosed preliminary plat, Mr. Ritze has only
approximately 15 feet of lot frontage on a dedicated public
right-of-way.
This stalemate between Mr. Yager and Mr. Ritze is stemming from the
actual section line which is noted at the top part of this preliminary
plat. Mr. Yager, when he purchased the property, was led to believe the
fence, which is highlighted in here, was the actual section line or his
south property line. However, Mr. Dennis Taylor, Taylor tend Surveyors,
a firm which has been hired to do the preliminary plat for Mr. Ritze, has
discovered that the actual section line does not run parallel with the
existing fence line as Mr. Yager had indicated. with the location of
this section line or northerly property line of Mr. Ritze's property,
part or parte of some of Mr. Yager's out buildings are shown within
Mr. Ritze's property.
The preliminary plat for the Ritze Manor 2nd Addition is before you
completed as far as it can be done with the exception of obtaining this
additional public right-of-way. Mr. Ritze has no other route to go with
this if there is an unwilling seller of the property to deed back to the
City for additional street right-of-way than to apply for a variance to
be allowed only 15 feet of lot frontage on a public right-of-way.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Approve the preliminary plat request for the proposed new subdivision
plat.
2. Deny the preliminary plat request for the proposed new subdivision
plat.
3. Table the preliminary plat request for the proposed new subdivision
plat.
1. Table the preliminary plat request for the proposed new subdivision
and have Mr. Ritze file a variance request for the next regularly
f scheduled Planning Commission meeting.
-2-
Council Agenda - 1/25/88
C. STAFF REMMPENIDATION:
Staff reconmiends that you table Mr. Ritze's preliminary plat request for
a proposed new subdivision plat. If Mr. Ritze would like to continue any
further with this preliminary plat request, he should file a variance
request with the Zoning Administrator, and if said variance request is
filed before the public hearing deadline, the variance request for less
than the minimum lot frontage on a public right-of-way be heard before
the Monticello Planning Commission at the next regularly scheduled
meeting on February 9, 1988. We feel that the stalemate that has been
created here by two private residential property owners should be dealt
with between the two property owners and their legal counsels if
desired. The City should be involved to the point where we advise the
applicant the next step he can take to possibly get his preliminary plat
approved.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the location of the proposed preliminary plat; Copy of the
preliminary plat for Ritze Manor 2nd Addition.
-3-
--__=I _-
I �
1 •
1
1
1 \R \\ A request for a preliminary plat
\ review of a proposed now subdivision
•�` plat.
Charles Ritze,
a
1
♦ \ R1
t
Y r X \ \
r I ` \ \
I y M 'ti r t
a.� J.
=r
l
,_— AM&M— -i ,,ONO .. APDI7'ION
LduNAHr PLAT Ok. �I TZ
PR Ato !OA• CR%RL Cf R?rF 1 r Wbsk{',;SiVAE rd.Y{ii'•Af5/O[NY/dt
Ksr s 0
�i�.. •� 'r�fi' •opi+c�ii lRri��. ee.Iw � .,
. ' •,. � .i 1.
•r i �,� �.� 1' .L:l�' r w•1 1 f
s' ; if i��! i :I I� .•1` •'�
.j II +, .•e3.
' � �' `� A � `\ ti\ r • e � ` ���",,,(��.��II]�JJJ���1JJ1r w. , I � i
7•, 1+ I I J
LOCATION MAPAr
v' 4,4.Pl
i>:' r
N 4��
mwm/f
•••Irw slur.
Lor a, s,ocr
brit ""A'Aw. !
■9r.ylr cvuwrr. -N,
1
..rr•,> :ri•:..:����H� '���`"� err-"«..:;..
i / W wRI..0 FN A
VN0 9UIiVEIt)!75 IK
' 13D Sm GROODW. 00ld 179 •r w s w� Iu11 • •
NOMTKEUD. twoomm. 0lMJf
r Rpt• I�III M•d7M � r� ��
' � , s0ay�'�. � JIUI►r�l,�., � M•_ �• _ � . —.- ..r, I •«... , re4r.
Council Agenda - 1/25/88
6. Consideration of Resolution Accepting Bid and Authorizing the Execution
of a Contract for Construction of a New Well. (J.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
As you may recall, at the last meeting the City Council authorized
advertisement for bids for construction of deep well 43 to be returned at
11:00 a.m. on the 25th of January. During the preparation of plans and
specifications, we informed Chuck Lepak of OSM that the minimum capacity
of a well acceptable to the City of Monticello would be 1,000 gallons per
minute. Both Walt Mack and myself feel very strongly that it would be
unacceptable to have a lower capacity well when spending all the
additional money on a pumphouse and equipment and controls. Ideally, it
may be even desirable to have 1,500 gallons per minute capacity.
The plans and specifications call for construction of a 14 -inch diameter
well with a 20 -inch diameter outside casing and 40 feet of 14 -inch
diameter screen. Our existing wells near the water tower have 16 -inch
inside casing with 16 -inch screens and are in a coarser formation than
deep well A3. It is my understanding that the Health Department no
longer allows a 16 -inch well with a 20 -inch outer casing and that to go
with a 16 -inch diameter well, we would now have to go with a 24 -inch
outside casing, thusly increasing the cost of the well. I have asked OSM
to re -analyze their design data to assure us that we will obtain a
minimum capacity of 1,000 gallons per minute with an acceptable drawdown
and margin of safety. I informed them that if they felt uncomfortable
with a 14 -inch well to achieve those desired results, they should
increase the size of the well appropriately prior to bidding or prior to
award.
Since the bids are due back on Monday morning, at this time I have no
information about the cost other than the engineer's estimate of $70,393
for construction and 27 percent or $19,007 for indirect
costs --engineering, legal, physical, and administrative --making a total
of $89,400. By comparison, the pumphouse, equipment, and controls are
expected to cost $198,100.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Award the bid to the lowest responsible bidder upon assurance from
OSM that the design will produce a minimum 1,000 gallon per minute
well capacity.
2. 7be second alternative would be to reject the bids and rebid the
project with a larger well size if necessary.
3. Alternative A3 could be to award the bid based upon the lowest
responsible bidder and negotiate for a larger size well. "is may
not be entirely acceptable legally.
-4-
Council Agenda - 1/25/88
C. STAPP RECONOMATION:
At this time, all indications are that the City Council should opt for
alternative $1 based upon the bid results received on Monday. We will
bring forth any additional information for Monday evening's meeting.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copies of pages 1-5 of the special conditions; Site plan for deep well #3
taken from the specifications for deep well #31 Resolution for adoption.
C
-5-
BIDS OPENED: 1-25-88
11:00 A.M.
CONTRACTOR
_Inr,e(.ore fo a CAIrw69&
LAyu6-WcST6a4 d.
A"[yf iNr« De, &--;,- G.
TR.o uT WCC t_
L
610 TABULATION
FOR
DEEP WELL NO. 3
CITY PROJECT NO. BB-OIA
FOR THE
CITY OF MONTICELLO
YRIGHT COWITY. MINNESOTA
BID d
SECURITY -T
ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
8 ASSOCIATES, INC.
TOTAL BID
'/?, o °�
SO 2IP. =
S/P,
Iliereby certify that th's 1s a true and
C correct tabulation of the bids as received
on:
By:
*..••.. 94wnro . OSN COMM. ND.
1 SPECIAL CONDITIONS
DEEP WELL NO. 3
CITY PROJECT NO. 68.OIA
FOR THE
CITY OF MONTIC ELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
1, GENERAL
The General Conditions, and Special Provisions as embodied in the Contract
Documents shall be applied to all work and materials to be furnished under these
specifications.
2. SCOPE OF WORN
The work to be done under these specifications shall include the furnishing of
all labor, materials, tools, machinery, fuel and equipment required and neces-
sary for the complete construction, testing and disinfection of the deep well as
shown on the plans and as specified herein. All work, unless hereinafter
specifically excepted, shall conform with the requirements of the Minnesota
Department of Health and the Standards of the American Water Works Association
pertinent to deep well installations.
The Contractor shall prepare the site for the work including access roads and
adequate storage areas for materials and shal 1 provide adequate and safe founda-
tion for his drill rig and other equipment. He shall further protect, repair,
relocate, maintain, and restore all subsurface, surface or overhead structures
directly or indirectly disturbed, injured or affected by his operations and
shall furnish all other appurtenant items of work and services necessary or
specified.
3, LOCATION AND LOCAL CONDITIONS
The location of the proposed well is as shown on the site plan.
The Contractor shall satisfy himself regarding all local conditions affecting
his work by personal investigation and neither the information contained in this
article nor that derived from plans or maps, or from the Owner or his agents or
employees shall act to relieve the Contractor from any responsibility hereunder
or from fulfilling any and all terms and requirements of the contract.
4. METHOD OF PRQCEDURE
the Contractor shall perform his work in such a manner as to cause the least
interference and delay to the City. The Contractor shall notify the Engineer in
writing of his intentions to commence work at least five (5) days prior to his
moving onto the site.
Prior to the start of any work, the Contractor shall submit in writing to the
Engineer for approval, a schedule of procedure and after once approved, he shall
not deviate from it without written permission from the Engineer.
S. WELL CQNSTRUCTLQN
It is the intent of these specifications that the well be constructed to
appropriate a water supply from alluvial formations at a rate of 1100 gallons
per minute.
3595.20
S.C. - I
Q
The Contractor shall drive 20" O.D. casing equipped with a forged steel drive
shoe by cable tool in the drift an estimated depth of 202 feet.
The Contractor shall then furnish and install a 14" O.D. casing, approximately
202 feet, which is carefully centered within the 20" casing. The 14' casing
shall then be driven approximately 50 feet through the water bearing strata.
The Contractor shall take samples of the material every 5' from start to the
I bottom of the hole to verify the bottom of casings and the strata to be
developed. The Contractor shall have a sieve analysis of the samples taken to
—r determine the slot size and length of screen.
For the purpose of this bid, set 40 feet of 25 slot, 14" telescoping screen with
packer into the 14" casing and pull the 14" casing back to expose the screen.
The screen to be Type 304 stainless steel by Johnson Screen Company.
When the screen has been set, the Contractor shall grout between the 20' and 14'
' casings and shall develop the well screen with air and water. The air compressor
shall be at least 300 cfm @ 150 psi. The Contractor shall use a combination of
jetting and air lifting to remove all fine sand that can come through the
screen.
When the screen has been developed, the Contractor shall furnish and install a
test pump capable of pumping up to 1500 gpm.
The well shall then be test pumped at various capacities, up to 1500 gpm. The
well will be pumped at 1000 gpm, minimum, with the desired rate being 1100 gpm.
_I All of the well construction shall meet the requirements of the State Health
Department.
All casing pipe shall be new steel with wall thickness in accordance with the
State Health Department requirements.
6. ALIGNMENT TESTS
Two alignment tests shall be made by the Contractor to demonstrate to the Engi-
neer that the well is straight and vertical. The first test shall be made after
setting the liner pipe but before grouting and the second test shall be made
after the well is completed. The tests shall be made in accordance with the
A.W.W.A. Standard Specifications A100.58. The equipment used shall be approved
by the Engineer especially with reference to the following. The diameter of the
cage used shall be not less than 1/4" smaller than the well diameter being
tested, shall be long enough so that it will not tilt appreciably and shall be
sufficiently heavy to keep the wire taut. The wire must be steel wire not
larger than M14, preferably piano wire and straight without kinks. The pulley
shall be rigidly supported at a position 10' above the top of the well casing or
some exact multiple thereof. Readings of the lateral displacement of the plumb
wire shalt be taken in two planes, 90[ apart and readings shall be taken at 10'
intervals to the depth required by the Engineer. Check readings shall be taken
upon withdrawal of the cage and if there is a substantial variation between
readings the entire operation shall be repeated until an accurate set of
readings shall be obtained. The result of the alignment log shall be plotted
both in profile and in plan view.
3595.20
S.C. - 2
9
The axis of each well may not deviate from the vertical in excess of two-thirds
of the smallest inside diameter of that part of the well being tested per 100'
of depth.
The well must be straight regardless of whether it is vertical or deviates from
the vertical. The tolerance relative to straightness shall be that the profile
of the center line of the well to a depth of at least as deep as the setting of
the permanent pump shall not deviate from a straight line by an amount more than
one-third of the inside diameter of the pipe being tested. No well shall be
accepted that has a dog leg.
In the event that a well does not meet the above requirements, the Contractor
shall correct such faults as exist or drill a new well at his own expense.
The Engineer reserves the right to make an alignment test at any time during
well construction at the Contractor's expense.
7. CEMENT GROl1T7N6
The cement grout shall be a neat Portland Cement grout consisting of one (1) bag
of cement to approximately five (5) gallons of clean water in such ratio as to
make a pumpable slurry. The cement must be placed in one continuous operation
and shall be placed from the bottom of the liner pipe to the surface to provide
a uniform wall of cement without voids. The cement grout shall be forced into
the annular space between the liner pipe and the cased and uncased portions of
the hole from the bottom up until It appears at the surface. This cement grout
shall be placed with and by the use of continuous mixer and suitable grout pump
or pumps. After the cement grout has been placed it shall be allowed to set for
a period of not less than seventy-two (12) hours before continuing other work on
the well.
Q. WELL L00
The Contractor shall keep a careful log of the well and a daily report of the
progress made including water and materials encountered and other relevant data.
The Contractor shall make such records available for inspection by the Engineer,
and, upon acceptance of the well, shall furnish the Engineer with duplicate
copies of the well logs showing accurately the elevation of each change in
stratum and identification of the material of each stratum.
9. DISPOSAL OF WATER AND REFUSE
The Contractor shall provide necessary piping, flumes and appurtenances to
conduct the discharge water (without erosion of soils) from all test pumping
procedures from the well location to discharge points as designated by the
Engineer.
Cuttings removed from the well shall be confined to the well site and may be
left on site if leveled.
Temporary test pump discharge piping will be considered incidental to the
project.
The pipe will remain the Contractor's property and all materials used for test
pumping shall be removed from the site.
3595.20 S.C. -
0
10. STERILIZATION
After all test procedures have been made and before final acceptance of the
well, the new well shall be entirely sterilized in accordance with the procedure
recommended by the Minnesota State Department of Health.
11, MATER SAM14E
Before the well is accepted, samples of water shall be taken by the Contractor
or his representative which shall be submitted to a reputable testing laboratory
for a bacterial and mineral analysis. A written report of each analysis shall be
sent in triplicate to the Engineer. The analysis and the reports shall be
provided at the Contractor's expense.
The bacterial analysis shall have a statement stating 'this water is potable and
considered safe for human consumption' typed in the report. The mineral analysis
shall as minimum, contain the following breakdown:
Calcium mg/1 as CaCO3
Magnesium mg/I as CaCO3
Sodium mg/1 as CaCO3
Alkalinity (M) mg/I as CaCO3
Alkalinity (P) mg/1 as CaCO3
Sulifate mg/1 as CaCO3
Chloride mg/1 as CaCO3
Total Hardness mg/1 as CaCO3
Iron mg/as Fe
Manganese Mg/I as Mn
PH
Color color units
Copper mg/1
Corrosivity
Foaming Agents mg/1
Hydrogen Sulfide mg/1
Odor Threshold Odor Number
Zinc mg/1
1?. COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW
' The Owner and the Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 105, wherein the Owner shall make application for permit to
appropriate ground water on Form W53-50 and the Contractor shall submit a well
log statement and pumping records on Form W41-97. These forms may be obtained
from the Minnesota Department of Conservation, Division of Waters, Centennial
Building, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101.
13, PAYMENT
Payment will be made on the basis of the unit prices bid on the Proposal form,
except where designated as lump sum items.
Although these specifications for well construction and appurtenant work are es-
tablished on the most accurate existing information available for the existence
of formations and the thickness and relative depth of same, the Quantities of
work specified herein and indicated on the Proposal Form are estimated only and
are subject to increase or decrease as may be required. Such quantities of
work, either increased or decreased, shall be performed at the contract unit
prices bid.
14. NOISE ELIMINATION
The Contractor shall eliminate noise to as greet an extent as possible at all
Ilk times. Well drilling rigs shall be equipped with silencers and the exhausts of
all gasoline motors or other power equipment shall be provided with mufflers.
161 3595.20
I
S.C. - 4
0
I
II- MFt.t QATA
The Contractor shall supply four (4) copies of the following information to the
Engineer prior to receiving final payment.
(l) A typewritten and graphic log of the well.
(2) A typewritten log of all test pumping operations showing drawdown,
pumping rate, date, hour, orifice reading and sand content.
(3) A typewritten log showing date and quantity of material bailed.
( 15, TEST WELL
A test well has been drilled on the site and a log is enclosed in the Appendix.
3545.20 S.C. - 5
5191 B
oy
I
bT-S 4 ,z,.4'=1-
4 EL 9ao.2'
PROPOSED
EEP WELL NO.3
TEST WELL LOCATIOPV
st•a 9.L
boat n.+Pouy
fyL
- — — —
1� a
sitE PLAJ
NO S"I.E
aa.9 er Womin T,§ ITEco... $510.^ORR.BCj4KLVN MAVURON
� PLAN
�& ASSWIATESANQ 5596.20
Date �,� •�p ro•,,.......,....., DEEP WELL N O.3
wr ur r� rw,•ra. n,u..i •.�. ...i• urn ••i a.. 8ik001AMO.
I �ID•9B ..NM O) .Id C.YYl1M1...rc
CITU OF MONTICELLn
RESOLUTION 88-3
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND
AUMORIZING. CONTRACT
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the furnishing of all labor
and materials for the construction complete in place of one screened well
approximately 250 feet deep to terminate in alluvial formations, bids were
received, opened, and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were
received complying with the advertisement:
AND WHEREAS, it appears that
is the lowest responsible bidoer.
IJOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA:
1. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed
to enter into the attached contract with
in the name of the City of Monticello for
the construction of one screened well approximately 250 feet deep
terminating in alluvial formations according to the plans and
specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in
the office of the City Administrator.
2. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to return
forthwith to all bidders the deposit made with their bids, except
that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder
shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
Adopted by the City Council this 25th day of January, 1988.
City ACministrator
N
Mayor
W
Council Agenda - 1/25/88
7. Consideration of Authorizing Purchase of Portable Pump for Civil
Defense. (J.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
In preparing the 1987 Budget, Gary Anderson and I discussed the need for
an additional portable pump within the City of Monticello. Currently the
City has a 6 -inch centrifugal pump at the lift station in Bridge Park.
This pump is hooked to the lift station for immediate response to a
problem in that area but can be transported by trailer to various other
sites if need be. In addition, the City has a small 3 -inch diaphragm,
low capacity, mud pump which we use for various Public Works projects and
periodically in the collection or Wastewater Treatment Plant. This pump
is a very low capacity, and the City has felt the need to purchase a
portable puny yet with more capacity than our existing one. The pump
would be used for pumping out flooded storm sewers, periodically for the
collection system for bypassing, and also at times for various projects.
In the preparation for the 1987 Budget we placed $2,400 in the civil
defense budget. That money was placed in there, as it was understood
that we could receive 1/2 the cost from the Department of Emergency
Services if the pump would be designated to have its primary use for
emergencies. It was clear to us that pumps are generally more often used
for emergencies than projects, so we felt it would be justified. The
Department of Emergency Services, however, did not give us funding for a
purtp. In recent discussions with PSG, however, they feel the need for
such a pump at the Wastewater Treatment Plant periodically and would be
willing to cover up to $1,000 toward the pump.
.he pump we have selected is the 16 horsepower, 4 -inch Teel Trash Pump.
It has capabilities of about 500 gallons per minute at 50 feet of head.
It is mounted on a skid with wheels. The coat of the pump from Grangers
through Olson's in Monticello is $2,215. Another source for the same
pump indicated a price at $2,260, thereby making Olson's the lowest
price. The City of Monticello would, therefore, pick up $1,215 of the
cost of the pump. We do have discharge hose at this time that can be
utilized with the pump and will temporarily utilize existing auction
hoses and would probably replace those to the proper size later on out of
the general operating budget. This w3uld put our anticipated cost for
the pump at $15 more than what was originally expected.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to authorize the purchase of this pump
at a cost of 62,215 with the City picking up $1,215.
2. The second alternative would be to pay the entire cost of the pump
and purchase the pump at $2,215.
3. A third alternative would be to continue to approach the Department
of Emergency Services for the funding of the pump and hold off on the
purchase until sometime in the future.
-6-
C
Council Agenda - 1/25/88
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the City
Council opt for alternative $1 and purchase the punp for a coat to the
City of $1,215.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the sheet from Graiger's catalog.
-7.
Y
ENGINE -DRIVEN TRASH AND LO
SOLIDS• 4ANDLING PUMPS
flip
1
iv f t
tltra(wer I
le
d'/auarr He% i i
+ TER .. 1
•' �
Na 7Pw Mw {/ast
• Ir HIP TmM hwV • 1/ N► M14. N.NIIn/ hmP
• Elrod. a 01"WI /bp • eOeeal 11-4161.4
r / p, Furl T..b • e01, Purl tan. -
OESCRI►TiONI 10 Ped 10 111• rnrnr drlvre ern• WITTED PARTS, fn'1 PY.Ln!run rrvinY and
f'1 r - L la'ar cal Ida In X cl—'..r: aril, r1, rost Ln, n .mla lire, aluura ural arts
Ittm.r r. ]�).�ct llrndlr RlM lrmisaerurra Rum Nlv nunlr al;c,.11:�]u I -:, 11l 1cI 11uM�end
4;mullu Guiato"l; mn rod rlumlxure Parti rnm• n-ru mlc Pani
I"a {x.n.4lhtY�N.wmrdlna DRIVER,
11-1i'J trema l:n dui U'enhlullYa..'rwrllr l? Mw ��Anlid+Ilun[I'nY 14^tP In IIP Or Wn&
j rl - uha. ll.rA wiaC dlma bn4. IFcL Iyr\Inu IL;1,1.n 1:n aun Iry x.l l.tenr r on Y, air•
7r Iltac:l. mlrlorti—h-
1. Lnm1/111 A.ralrrar,
U NP MM PrmP d.^liven ILma In 77."G1'll or � 7P'{Si Tn+h Pun:P Id 111, 110.". • simitt..
O '• 17'11.1' I:rad_ lY11x. and d1Y p. r\o P Ir, ,,Leine alto rlr. Irni .rl In\nual m—I "M.
d nu7 b1r n mmad r rineo uul. 1'eq In hl.0 Y I lu th1a1 c In un o:n•ro\txl s IYb
1/ Me
If1'11:.� MaInq,]rtu1.Tt.1l.(1l,.h1P.uPn,skrrKiY iia Il'Itl llors Ir•lue IMxNrM IrIxMmNunlrR 11
rM pYp�a, Il vin lrlx 11l,,,lha`n+.r 1ulanl•lIr1r.r lI:x�r,nldlrefr,ndalm+Mq.
%
tehf
mayMn.Pwwdlp 1—t—enfa•
uYM 6W a 741. e J 11 1141111 1 7 n.6 Im ludorl.
CO: of icn xl Iroah .ed eullde Mildllly pump I Ibrb r.elnri W.I.ro Qlrllirn r.l:fup rhea R
COM{TQUCl10Y1 f' q .1—ierlw 11-4.2 be* ..he.. ..I- ndalon Inr I— a1 _r Fllmla:
x:Wr.,t.r !. 1%4arYL�1 reM true duo rrlyW eud enn ele.m.lmn nMr ntni, 1u111i u•Il.dV 1 air•
lens ]n1• . \p Iry .,Mab y m ielrnllar. flodr• carry elr rlr\nef, \n� eYil. rrrl'ally IwTuM
w cLl div nh..l can, rna 1., .bdlpp Mul
l1a1u 1 ll. pabddY Y,nRler llle0 he. bwb.l
a-ol.nf t aro n 1Lae11d Ous 1� Mala• w{!. fru11 q'I^P+ MhI�a w1. SOi 0 1b► l a y
1 ;Ira 110.0 \I1•r.r r 1 1 11 ev I YI/0 Ru n,PRlYx lrruhl ...a . STa,71/ 7�
/raj1•d uy I. L 1Mw
roP11ew W unwrPa...=f uIdevise N4ei�ll w4ats, 611-
e... 1 wINUIN44a1q NN �00Q
i L •�... ,. :SIVA
N'nue• veer
— - � 1UM�11ROONIi�NC�
LTVMI Y.p al IYOi 1 Mee
Ya {a, rw. -a", mow._ w.`r wt/a. Ya ' r a, Ir R, a."
I
EL1sM- -]I
R"` 30 rat» 111114111)��,71D /I,mD 17.71ti'Ie anle wD�'Blhp• III H.
y16Y'87MU_111.QRIN 4111` tr.m-IR RIq I/� Y1�
rn 11wrp Y P.1 d1v1e. w EN
SOUD54wcu"M ""S VS. Tt"M PUMM
Titak /v ery -FF.M= W r ..j1W pywl�,rh Ph hassle f1 a1:11dt the. Naplerd
11 m1.lY wu �PVP11w1P. IrY m >1W by .du �1•mN- �n1d11 wwlxf�el a .. h r+ Marm•\. M10Y\,
T
mud Th e\I�uls P\aYb x olid dlevvPlrr h MY Inr ..w� .n 1Yr +w4mn 1W,
•Hash Vt w1W W 4 it eller x\6• rwu Ie IM I+Iter I, r ur.n\ 1e0i+Y4 77tr
I. n1.e...I the Peel,wP VI.baul Wuwd In : r.-:.u.r 1hn .w LMR \d
I.— n\rw, it-.,
M14r•MMIhLR Pumps have .yPrralmniW IM —?bile% IA handl, h lee metrpel u
A.ash lulyn 71 1 1fYn de nPl Tan IM C. MY Ix\ w by�y . •1 i • .IIIwe
: 1 I,a:..• I; �,w• 1wy Mw• 1 W� rrwmml m1 I Nwnl11 Yu . 71•,r nfpm axl.s 1•aa 1
i I"q 1 �wrouetr�.A ••Ica. 1nnaft, �Wduatlrwa cru oob .mrd Prr,. sew rr
ME WAMUAW ON ORUATM ON WSW RACK COVEII ` 1111111
Council Agenda - 1/25/88
C
Consideration of Appointment to Planning Commission. (R.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKMWUND:
At the January 12 Planning Commission meeting, Planning Commission
members received word that Mr. Jim Ridgeway will be resigning from the
Planning Commission due to his increasing employment commitments. As a
result, the Planning Commission will need a new individual to complete
the term for 1988 of Mr. Ridgeway. The Planning Commission members in
attendance at the last meeting suggested a few individual names to the
City staff as possible candidates, and I personally contacted three
individuals who at this point in time were not interested in accepting a
Planning Commission appointment.
An advertisement was placed in the Monticello Shopper requesting
individuals who had an interest in being appointed to the Planning
Commission to contact City Hall by noon, Monday, January 25. At the time
this agenda is being prepared, we have not received any inquiries on
possible candidateal and as a result, we may not have any recommendations
to provide for a possible replacement.
Naturally, if any of the Council is aware of an individual who can serve
on the Planning Commission, their name can be considered Monday evening.
If by the Council meeting we have not received any names of interested
parties, no action will be necessary by the Council other than to
continue seeking applicants for the position.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
None at this time.
I4L
-e-
DECEMBER BALANCE --- GENERAL FUND -- JANUARY
State Capitol credit Union - Payroll ded.
Rick WolfstelleT - Mileage expense for Dec.
Anoka Social Services - Payroll ded.
ICMA Retirement Corp. - Payroll ded.
PERA - Payroll ded. - ins. premium
Gruys, Johnson - Computer charges for Nov.
Mpls. Star 6 Tribune - Adv. for Asst. Adm.
011ie Koropchok - Mileage expense
Horizons, Inc. - Topographic maps
David Anderson - Reimb. for s!v account
Buffalo Bituminous - Otter Creek Road project
Olson 4 Sons Electric - Misc. repairs b parts
U. S. Postmaster - Postage machine refill
Lynnea Gillham - Mileage for 87
Jerry Hermes - Janitorial at Library
David Stromberg - Animal control expense
PERA - Para WJH
Wright County State Bank - FICA 6 FWT
S 6 L Excavating - Final payment 86-7 project
The Innovation Groups - Mocre computer software directory
Assoc. of MN. Emergency Managers - Membership dues - Civil Def.
MN. Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees
MN. Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees
MN. Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees
Frank Madden 4 Assoc. - Legal fees
Mobil Oil - Gas
Smith, Pringle, Hayes - Legal fees
Construction 5, Inc. - Reimb. for storm sever stub - Lauring L.
Ramier 6 Cries - Professional services
Dahlgren, Uban, etc. - Planner expense
Century Labs - Ice foe - St. Dept.
Viking Pipe Service - Televising sanitary sewers
Diane Jacobson - Mileage expense
Water Products - Clamp for Water Dept.
Double D Electric - Repair lights at hockey rink
Phillips 66 - Gas
Prentice Hall - Sub. for Public Works Dept.
Road Machinery - Truck rental - Christmas dec.
Humane Society of Wright County - Animal control expense
Richard Martis - Planning Comm. salary
Cindy Lamm - Planning Comm. salary
Richard Carlson - Planning Comm, salary
Arve Grimsmo - Mayor salary
Fran Fair - Council salary
William Fair - Council salary
Dan Blonigen - Council salary
Warren Smith - Council salry
Beverly Johnson - Animal control contract
James Preusse - Cleaning city hall and fire hall
YMCA of Mple. - Monthly contract payment
Liquor Fund - Interest income on investments
Petty Cash - Reimb. petty cash fund
Monticello Fire Dept. - Salaries
Monticello Fire Dept. - Reimb. for supplies purchased in '87
Wright County State Bank - Investments
AMOUNT CHECK NO.
123.04
300.00
204.00
759.34
27.00
290.00
172.48
24.50
10,570.00
32.00
4,615.45
477.37
500.00
31.25
216.67
302.00
1,353.04
4,507.62
24,470.30
29.95
20.00
196.00
242.00
36.00
182.00
96.00
609.00
460.00
141.25
4,148.92
212.47
440.00
59.60
443.25
146.25
50.85
44.93
470.00
40.00
49.27
49.27
49.27
175.00
125.00
125.00
125.00
123.19
275.00
450.00
583.33
2,107.67
40.79
2,?00.26
590.90
99,000.00
s.
25326
25327
25328
25329
25330
25331
25332
25333
25334
25335
25336
25337
25338
25339
25340
25341
25342
25343
25344
25345
25346
25347
25348
25349
25350
25351
25352
25353
25354
25355
25356
25357
25358
25359
25360
25361
25362
25363
25364
25365
25366
25367
25368
25369
25370
25371
25372
25373
25374
25375
25376
25377
25378
25379
25380
GENERAL FUND
AMOUNT
CHECK YO.
Trojan Industries - Fence for ball field
3,097.71
25381
MN. Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees
430.00
25382
MN. Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees
200.00
25383
M. Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees
112.00
25384
Voss Electric - Bulbs for St. Dept.
284.52
25385
Big Lake Machine - Repair to equipment
11.00
25386
MN. Conway Fire 6 Safety - Fire Dept. equipment - hose
1,376.00
25387
St. Cloud Restaurant Supply - Paper towels for library
34.78
25388
Buffalo Vacuum - Vacuum bags for library
25.80
25389
Red's Mobil - Repairs
45.30
25390
Homes b Graven - Professional services
113.42
25391
Schleunder Const. - Services performed at Sen. Citizens bldg.
561.00
25392
Bowman. Barnes - Supplies - Mtce. Dept.
91.18
25393
Marco Business Products - Mtce, agreement on typewriter
78.00
25394
Local N49 - Union dues
115.00
25395
Monticello Family Practice - Physical for A. Gaptnski
54.00
25396
Fire Safety 6 Communications - Gloves and goggles - Fire Dept.
93.24
25397
Unitog Rental Services - Uniform rental - Mtce. Dept.
102.40
25398
DAvid Spinler - Monticello Ford garage building demolition
5.944.00
25399
Automatic Systems - Repair at water tower
451.29
25400
Maus Tire Service - Tire repair
6.50
25401
Gould Bros. Chev. - Repairs - Fire truck
51.75
25402
Monticello Ford Mercury, Inc. - Fire truck repairs
64.26
25403
McDowall Co. - Repairs at city hall
312.73
25404
Corrow Sanitation - Garbage contract charges
7,001.40
25405
MN. Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees
770.00
25406
MN. Dept. of Nat. Ree. - Dep. Reg. fees
335.00
25407
". Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees
130.00
25408
ICMA Retirement Corp. - Payroll dad.
759.34
25409
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll dad.
123.04
25410
Busse Construction - Chelsea Road project - boyle escrow acct.
12,316.50
25411
Jerry Hermes - Janitorial at library
216.67
25412
David Stromberg - Animal control expense
302.00
25413
Rick Wolfsteller - Misc. mileage
35.12
25414
J. M. Oil Co. - Gas- Mtce. Dept.
1,676.03
25415
Monticello Times - Advertising
103.20
25416
Feedrite Controls - Mev pump
1.550.81
25417
Northern Oxygen Services - Fire Dept. supplies
11.70
25418
Wright County State Bank - FICA b FWf
4,419.28
25419
Commissioner of Rev. - SWT
1.981.00
25420
PM - Pero W/H
1,318.62
25421
Griefnow Sheet Metal - S/W new account books
48.00
25422
Automatic Garage Door - Repair at fire station
62.00
25423
Fyle's Excavating - Digging at Oakview Circle 6 Pipe
490.00
25424
Monticello Office Products - Office supplies
158.70
25425
Ramier 4 Gri.es - Professional services
135.00
25426
Monticello Printing - Misc. printing
52.70
25427
Maus Foods - Supplies for all depts.
138. 12
25428
Servi Star Hdwe. - Supplies- Water Dept.
52.41
25429
Earl Anderson - Sign posts, etc.
342,81
25430
Buffalo Bituminous - Yinter mix for streets
350.00
25431
Harry's Auto Supply - Supplies
329.45
25432
State Treasurer - St. Bldg. Ins. - Bldg. permit surcharge
409.01
25433
Monticello Times - Printing and publishing, etc.
546.75
25434
Olson 6 Sons Electric - Misc. repairs
185.21
25435
Coast to Coast - Supplies for all Depts.
134.91
25436
-2-
GENERAL FUND
AMOUNT
CHECK NO.
Bauerly Bros. -..Class V
350.00
25437
KStowski Auto Sp. 6 Welding - Bolts - St. Dept.
112.00
25438
Big Lake Lumber - Panel door - Public Works Dept.
130.00
25439
Monticello Public Library - Reimb. of petty cash fund
378.90
25440
Business Records Corp. - Receipt books
242.23
25441
Carroll, Franck b Assoc. - Computer consulting fees
1,000.00
25442
Data Mgmt. Design - Computer charges
1,614.34
25443
Corrow Sanitation - Landfill charges - December
1,336.40
25444
Liquor Fund - Reimb. fund for interest earned on C. D.
2,118.00
25445
Bridgewater - Telephone charges
891.88
25446
Feedrite Controls - Sample
10.00
25447
Duerr's Water Care Service - Softener at Bland res.
12.25
25448
Unocal - Gas
162.05
25449
Northern Oxygen - Supplies
23.40
25450
North Central Public service - Utilities
1,695.32
25451
Smith. Pringle b Hayes - Legal fees
462.00
25452
Hoglund Bus - Parts for equipment
936.75
25453
Northern States Power - Utilities
6,227.15
25454
Commissioner of Revenue - Sales tax
546.95
25455
Central McGowan - Supplies
38.49
25456
Adam's Pest Control - Library contract payment
42.00
25457
Professional Turf Renovation - Seeding baseball fields
5,700.00
25458
Safety Kleen Corp. - Equip. mtce. - Public Works
40.00
25459
Acucraft, Inc. - Repairs
20.00
25460
Earl Andersen - Signe
1.064.57
25461
Lindberg Decorating - Paint for 4th St. Park
325.97
25462
The Plumbery - Old fire hall repairs
135.59
25463
Foster Franzen Ins. - Fire Dept. ins. policy
60.69
25464
Monticello Fire Dept. - Salaries
1,751.05
25465
MN. Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees
166.00
25466
MN. Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees
307.00
25467
MN. Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg, fees
148.00
25468
Norwest investments - Computer contract payment
2.407.61
25469
Professional Services Group - WMTP contract payment
22.083.35
25470
Principal Mutual Life Ins. - Group Ins.
4,633.87
25471
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll dad.
123.04
25472
Anoka Social Services - Payroll dad.
204.00
25473
Rick Wolfsteller - Mileage allowance
300.00
25474
PERA - Ina. premiums
27.00
25475
Sherburne Wright Cable - 88 Cable Comm. contribution
6.411.00
25476
1L4. Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees
202.00
25477
VOID
-0-
25478
MN. Dept. of Nat. Ree. - Dep. Reg. fees
159.00
25479
MN. Dept. of Nat. Ree. - Dep. Reg. fees
54.00
25480
ICMA Retirement Corp. - Payroll dad.
786.17
25481
Jerry Hermes - Janitorial at library
227.50
25482
David Stromberg - Animal control expense
302.00
25483
David Stromberg - Animal control expense - adoption of animals
286.00
25484
PERA - Para W/H
1.394.51
25485
Wright County State Bank - FICA b FWT
4,875.06
25486
MN. Dept. of Health - Reviewal fee for now well
250.00
25487
Granite Electronics - Repairs for Fire Dept.
57.75
25488
Tri County Humane Society - Animal control expense
40.00
25489
Govt. Fin. Officers Assoc. - Membership dues for Rick W.
70.00
25490
AT 6 T - Fire phone
3.96
25491
Local N49 - Union dues
92.00
25492
-3-
GENERAL FUND
AMOUNT
CHECK NO.
MDRA - Deputy Reg. dues
140.00
25493
MN. GFOA - Membership dues for Rick Wolfsceller
10.00
25494
Wang - Mtce. agreement - computer
426.00
25495
League of MN. Cities - Membership dues
96.00
25496
MN. Park Supervisors Assoc. - Membership dues for Roger Mack
15.00
25497
Marquette Bank Mpls. - Imp. bonds -'7I
10,270.00
25498
American National Bank - Misc. imp. bonds
85,469.67
25499
Norwest Bank Mpls. - Misc. imp. bonds
629,321.00
25500
First Trust Bank - Misc. bond payments
471,217.50
25501
The Plumbery - Repairs at old fire hall
36.79
25502
NADA Used Car Guide - Sub. - Dnp. Reg. Dept.
32.00
25503
Monticello- Big Lake Pet Hospital - Animal control expense
135.00
25504
Wahl 6 Wahl - Office supplies
95.85
25545
Monticello Senior Citizen Center - Reimb. Inf. Ctr, salaries
660.55
25506
Simonson Lumber - Misc. supplies
31.98
25507
Wright County Treasurer - Sheriff contract - Jan.
11,896.62
25508
Stadiums Unlimited - Bleachers and benches for parks
7,332.00
25509
Foster Franzen - ins. premium for boiler machine 6 bond
1,278.00
25510
Crysteel Dist. - Snowplow
3.526.00
25511
Gary Anderson - Misc. mileage
135.02
25512
Mobil 011 - Gas - Water/St. Depts.
33.97
25513
Humane Society of Wright County - Animal control services
50.00
25514
ci
'
Chapin Publishing - Adv. for bids for new well
87.55
25515
Glacier Park Co. - Burlington Northern agreement fee
7.50
25516
Payroll for December
24,445.69
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS FOR JANUARY - GENERAL $1,533.044.63
LIQUOR FUND
LIQUOR DISBURSEMENTS FOR END OF DECEMBER AND JANUARY
SUNT
CHECK
NO.
Ed Phillipe 6 Sons - Liquor
1,363.00
13502
Griggs, Cooper 6 Co. - Liquor
4,330.71
13503
Wright County State Bank - FICA 6 FWT
608.28
13504
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded.
170.00
13505
NCR Corporation - Maintenance agreement
1,587.00
13506
Commissioner of Revenue - Sales tax for November
6,868.46
13507
Principal Mutual Life - Group Ins.
388.37
13508
KMOM Radio, Inc. - Advertising
180.00
13509
Gruys, Johnson 6 Assoc. - Computer charges for Nov.
110.00
13510
Buffalo Bituminous - Liquor store parking lot improvement
3,939.45
13511
PERA - Pero WIN
198.61
13512
Griggs, Cooper 6 Co. - Liquor
80.03
13513
Quality Wine 6 Spirits - Liquor
1,233.23
13514
Johnson Bros. Liquor - Liquor
2,900.69
13515
Ed Phillips 6 Sons - Liquor
2,498.39
13516
Griggs. Cooper 6 Co. - Liquor
3.173.40
13517
Rubald Beverage Co. - Wine purchase
319.60
13518
Ron's Ice Co. - Ice purchase
163.08
13519
St. Cloud Refrigeration - Store repairs
44.13
13520
Griggs, Cooper 6 Co. - Liquor
6,385.78
13521
Eagle Wine Co. - Wine purchase
1,178.70
13522
Quality Wine - Wine purchase
1.458.00
13523
Johnson Bros. - Liquor
2.874.15
13524
City of Monticello - Payoff on assessments - Hwy. 25 6 5} St. Pro3.
4,776.47
13525
Johnson Bros. - Liquor
3,576.76
13526
Ed Phillips 6 Sons - Liquor
76.98
13527
St. Cloud Restaurant Supply - Garbage liners
29.18
13528
Griggs, Cooper - Liquor
143.98
13529
McDowall Co. - Repair furnace
78.00
13530
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded.
170.00
13531
Wright County State Bonk - FICA 6 FWf
677.02
13532
Commissioner of Revenue - SWT
212.00
13533
PERA - Para W/H
212.07
13534
Raymond Gay - Security at Store on 12/31187
117.00
13535
OSM - Engineering fees
456.67
13536
Carol Lessard - Inventory assistance at Store
22.00
13537
Kolles Sanitation - Garbage service for Dec.
133.50
13538
Monticello Times - adv.
197.80
13539
Coast to Coast - Supplies for Store
11.80
13540
Maus Foods - Store expense
4.57
13541
Liefert Trucking - Freight
664.13
13542
Johnson Bros. - Liquor
566.88
13543
Monticello Office Products - Office supplies
19.14
13544
Cloudy Town Dist. - Misc. mdse.
160.00
13545
Jude Candy 6 Tobacco - Misc. mdse.
774.44
13546
Dahlhoimer Dior. - Beer
13.194.45
13547
Viking Coca Cola - Misc. mdso.
522.65
13548
Groselein Beverage - Beer, etc.
16.651.35
13549
Thorpe Dist. - Beer
10,357.65
13550
Ed Phillips 6 Sons - Liquor
742.16
13551
_ Seven Up Bottling - Misc, mdse.
199.15
13552
Bernick's Pepsi Coca Cola - Misc. mdse.
309.95
13553
Granite City Jobbing - Misc. mdse.
119.09
13554
LIQUOR FUND
11
AMOUNT
CiECK
N0.
Granite City Cash Register - Tape for cash register
153.97
13555
Ron' s Ice Co. - Ice purchase
99.90
13556
Dick Beverage Co. - Beer
1,472.35
13557
Day Dist. Co. - Supplies
769.00
13558
Minnesota Bar Supply - Mist. mdse.
123.49
13559
Bridgewater - Telephone
63.34
13560
North Central Public Service - Utilities
166.04
13561
Northern States Power - Utilities
554.55
13562
Commissioner of Revenue - Salts tax
9.868.40
13563
Moon Motors - Snowblower
325.00
13564
Principal Mutual Life - Group Ins.
388.37
13565
Servicemaster of Monticello - Carpet cleaning
150.00
13566
Griggs, Cooper b Co. - Liquor
6.472.40
13567
Ed Phillips 6 Sons - Liquor
1,502.31
13568
Eagle Wine Co. - Liquor
34.02
13569
Gron Seth Directory - Adv.
51.00
13570
Quality Wine - Liquor
640.52
13571
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded.
170.00
13572
PERA - Ins. premium - reimb.
9.00
13573
PERA - Para Y1H
222.32
13574
Wright County State Bank - FICA 6 FWT
704.72
13575
Ed Phillips 4 Sons - Liquor
1.681.73
13576
Griggs, Cooper - Liquor
1,425.11
13577
Gary Raitan - Security at Store Christmas Eve
108.00
13578
Johnson Bros. - Liquor
577.91
13579
Ed Phillips 6 Sons - Liquor
63.72
13580
Payroll for December
3,697.25
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS FOR JANUARY
$128,724.32
11
TOTAL REVENUE 8 2,406.22
INDIVIDUAL PERMIT ACTIVITY REPORT
Month of December 1987
PERMIT
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TYPO
NAMC/1�CATIOM
VA3.UATION
rEEs
PERMITM
I7
6URCHGE
PLUMDING
SURCHARGE
87-11]9
Interior Remodel
AC
M -BL Community Hoop./1013 Hart Blvd.
B 80,000.00
9 949.50
5 40.00
87-1141
Atlionad Gore ge
NO
Do Id Pertrldga/165 Prairl• Road
5,000.00
50.00
2.50
87-1142
Oull dl noDemmlltlo-
AC
Monticello HRA/250 Celt Orwdvey
.00
.00
.00
87-1143
Nouse G Garage
e►
Cyr Cont;; Ltd/7743 Mapl—cd Circle
62,600.00
471.20
31.30
5 27.00
5 .50
67-1144
Garage Addition
AD
William eparror/110 X111enat Road
2,000.00
20.00
1.00
B7-1145
xouae and Garage
Br
IYrku• Land 6 011/2615 Meador Oak One
67,100.00
491.45
]].55
74.00
.50
87.1146
Hmuaa L Garage Raalding
AD
Gene Walters/507 E. 3rd Bt.
4,000.00
40.00
2.00
TOTALS
5270,700.00
51,622.15
5110.35
5 47.00
51.00
PLAN AEVI EM
67-114]
Nouse and Garage
8►
Cyr COnet. Ltd/274] Meplerood Clrcl•
5 706.28
87-1145
House and Garage
6T
Marku• Land L 011/2615 Meador Oak Lne
719.44
TOTAL PLAN REVIEW
5 625.7:
TOTAL REVENUE 8 2,406.22
• • +•� a 1.i
(e.d
Mw. e. Tl �i•,(Mv1e
rie�al a nt0
CITY or MONTICELLO
Monthly :ul101ag Department Report
\
Month Of D camber
1967
J
PERMITS AND USES
PERMITS ISSUED
La-
This
Same Month Last
tear This
Y..r
IhNthMonti
OEC.
Leat year To Date To Data
RESIDENTIAL
Mummer
2
s
4
172
10
Va lust!on
367,900.00
5 1.0,700.00
5 58,430.00 1B,t16,050.00
9
4,640.100.0
rase
862.73
1,698.77
775.00
40,518.:0
41,726.41
Surchergaa
33.95
70.75
29.20
4,0!7.61
2,326.2
COMMERCIAL
Rumber
2
1
4
22
2
Va luetlOn
1:,500.00
80,000.00
379,000.00 3.979,930.00
801,630.
ree.
220.50
549.50
1,851.02
19,966.96
6,064.7
Surcharges
9.25
40.00
169.10
1,989.95
405.0
IRDUSTRIAL
Numher
4
V.lu.tlon
770,500.00
1,242,700.0
Pae.
3,725.27
7,990.0
Surcharges
621.3.
PLU INS
Number
1
2
2
82
5
raaa
23.00
47.00
55.00
2,990.00
1,786.0
Surcharges
.50
1.00
1_.00
41.00
27.5
OTIIER6
Number
1
31:
V.lu.t/en
.00
10,000.00
92,400.0
race
.00
100.50
850.!
:u rclu rpme
.00
6.00
46.0
TOTAL NO. PERMITS
5
9
10
247
19
TOTAL VALUATION
06,400.00
220,700.00
397,470.00 12,876,400.00
6,776,830.00{
TOTAL FEES
1.106.23
2,294.87
2,282.62
67,001.53
58.417.74
TOTAL DURCIIARSES
43.70
111.35
199.70
6,479.01
3,428.14
CURRENT MONTII
FI E:
th.bat to
IH Ie
PERMIT NA7VRr.
Numh.t 1•I.A.IT 9U1101ARCIS ValuetI-
This Vast
"It Year
Single really
2 6
1,586.37 8 64.:5
0 129,700.00
35
SO
1 Pl e.
2
12
Multi-remlly
7
8
C.
lneaarla
2
2
Rae. O.t.gee
1
50.00 2.50
5,000.00
12
II
Sign.
0
0
Public Oullclng e
1
0
ALTERA?ION OR Rr.PA1R
DMelllnps
2
60.00 7.00
6,000.00
47
41
Co•et.t.1
1
!49.50 40.00
00,000.00
19
16
InSu. Lrl s1
1
7
PIAIMO:NO
All Types
2
47.00 1.00
5S
02
ACCESSORY OTRUCTUSaKS
O.Imeing Pool.
1
1
Deck.
10
4
TEMPORARY PERMIT
0
0
DEMOLITION
1
.00 .00
.00
2
1
TDTA1.6
9
2,294.17 111.75
220,700.00
103
243
• • +•� a 1.i
(e.d
Mw. e. Tl �i•,(Mv1e
rie�al a nt0