Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 02-23-1987AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL Monday, February 23, 1987 - 7:30 p.m. Mayor: Arve A. Grimsmo Council Members: Fran Fair, Bill Fair, warren Smith, Dan Blonigen 1. Call to Order. 2. Approval of Minutes of the Special Meeting Held February 9, 1987, and the Regular Meeting Held February 9, 1987. 3. Citizens Comments/Petitions, Requests and Complaints. Old Business 4. Consideration of Authorizing Contract Execution with DMDI for Computer Acquisition and Awarding Lease Agreement Per Bid. Nov Business 5. Consideration of an Application for a 3.2 Beer Off -Sale License - Applicant, Red Owl Stores. 6. Consideration of a Proposal for a Simple Subdivision - Applicant, Nick Kamp&. 7. Consideration of a Proposal for a Simple Subdivision - Applicant, Russell Lovegren. 8. Consideration of an Application to Renew a Gambling License - Applicant, Monticello American Legion. 9. Consideration of a Request to Attend the National Conference for Finance Officers. 10. Consideration of Bills for the Month of February. 11. Adjourn. MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, February 9, 1987 - 6:30 p.m. A special meeting of the Monticello City Council was duly held at 6:30 p.m., Monday, February 9, 1987, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall. Members Present: Arve A. Grimemo, Fran Fair, Bill Fair, Warren Smith, Dan Blonigen. Members Absent: None. The Mayor called the meeting to order and noted that the agenda item was to determine a resolution with respect to the status of the relationship between the City of Monticello and the Monticello Senior Citizen's Organization. Mayor Grimsmo provided some brief background on the history of the Senior Center Organization, its relationship with the City, and that the current issue had arisen due to the City's participation in the state mandated comparable worth study. Mayor Grimsmo asked Administrator Eidem to provide a brief explanation of the concept and process of comparable worth for the members of the Senior Citizen's Organization who were present. Administrator Eidem provided a brief review of the concept of comparable pay for comparable worth and indicated that based on the pointe established from the comparable worth worksheets, the Senior Center Director's position appeared Lo be adequately compensated at a half to three-quarter time level. Eidem noted that in a conversation with the Director, a discrepancy with respect to full or part-time statue became apparent. Mayor Grimemo wished to stress for everyone's benefit that the discussion was not reflecting on the job performance of Karen Hanson, but rather on the status of the position independent of who fills that position. The Mayor noted that Councilmembers Warren Smith and Bill Fair had agreed to work with members of the Senior Organization to further clarify the issue. Caroline Ellison indicated that she would be serving as the spokesperson on behalf of the Senior Center Organization. She noted that there had been considerable debate among the members of the Seniors Organization on how they would like to have their organization regarded. The following statement was submitted to the members of the City Council in writing: The Monticello Senior Citizens Center is a valuable resource in the Community, with its participants actively taking part in and promoting community projects, with the Centore primary function being to help the frail and elderly. Be it known that the Monticello Senior Citizens Board of Directors, presents the following proposal to the City Council of Monticello. It is our request that the City of Monticello continue to support the Monticello Senior Citizens Canter by providing a rent free facility, a full-time paid Director, maintenance, all utilities and insurance, as they have done in the past. ,f 14, Special Council Minutes - 2/9/87 we would like to be allowed to continue generating our own funds for maintaining our services and programs on a daily basis. Councilmembers warren Smith and Bill Fair indicated that they had not served as an official committee on behalf of the City Council when they met with the Senior Center Board of Directors, but rather met with them as individual Council members to gain greater information. Councilmember Fair stated that they had met with members of the Senior Organization and had asked them to come to the City Council with a statement of preference, but further noted that the request from the Senior Organization wouldn't necessarily bind the Council to that kind of an arrangement. Mrs. Ellison spoke on behalf of the Senior Center and why it required additional City funding. She noted that the Center provides a public good, for in many instances it is contended that individuals are able to remain in their homes rather than having to reside in a nursing home or hospital. Marie Peterson, representing the Senior Citizen Organization, felt it was important to stress that all members of the Senior Organization wanted to be known as an independent organization and not as an arm of the City. The organization was, however, concerned about the funding policies of the City. Councilmember Fran Fair indicated that regardless of the status of the organization, whether it be an independent organization receiving a subsidy or a functional department of the City, budget considerations would always have to be taken into account. Councilmember Bill Fair indicated that his preference was that the City supply an annual subsidy for the Senior Organization to then operate independently. Mayor Grimsmo indicated that he felt the Senior Center belonged as part of the City. The Mayor than requested Shelly Johnson, Superintendent of Monticello Schools and a member of the Senior Center Board of Directors, to comment on the Board's preference. Mr. Johnson indicated that the Board would like to continue in the existing mode of operation, to wit, the Senior Organization will take care of themselves with the exception that the City should continue to take care of the building and to pay Karen Hanson's salary and benefits. Councilmember Fran Fair requested that the issue be clarified. She stated she felt that there was not complete comprehension of what the City hoped to accomplish and that there were loose ends that needed to be addressed. Councilmember Bill Fair indicated that his preference was for the City to remit to the Senior Organization treasury an annual subsidy which would than place the autonomy of decision upon the Board of Directors of the Senior Organization, including the establishment of the Director's salary within the limits of the Organization's budget. Councilmember Sill Fair indicated that through a letter of understanding executed between the Senior Organization and the City, the Senior Director could be paid through the City's payroll department but would be reimbursed for all associated personnel costa by the Senior Organization out of the subsidy amount granted annually. -2- Special Council Minutes - 2/9/87 Councilmember Bill Fair moved that the City of Monticello provide a direct subsidy in the amount of 521,000 for the year 1987 to the Monticello Senior Citizen Organization, said Organization operating as an independent organization, that the City shall provide the Senior Citizen Center rent free, and shall provide complete regular maintenance for the building. Further, the City shall execute a letter of understanding between the Senior Organization and the City to address and facilitate the payment of the Director's salary and benefits, said letter of understanding to be similar in nature to the agreement executed between the City of Monticello and the Sherburne/Wright Counties Cable Communications Commission for the payment of the Cable Administrator. The motion was duly seconded by Dan Blonigen. Voting in favor: Arve Grimsmo, Fran Fair, Bill Fair, Warren Smith, Dan Blonigen. Voting in opposition: None. Motion carried unanimously. S � T Omae A. E em City Administrator `, N I` MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, February 9, 1987 - 7:30 p.m. Members Present: Fran Fair, Bill Fair, Arve Grimsmo, warren Smith, Dan Blonigen Members Absent: None. 2. Approval of Minutes. Motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Bill Fair, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held January 26, 1987. Councilmember warren Smith noted that in the minutes of January 26 under item seven concerning the conditional use permit for dispensing automotive fuel at the proposed convenience store site, the minutes referred to the notation that two areas in Monticello having contamination from gasoline spillage and that only the Standard Station was noted in the minutes. As a result, motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by Bill Fair, and unanimously carried to amend the minutes pertaining to this item to include the notation that the second contaminated site was the old bulk storage site now occupied by the new City Fire Hall. The original motion to approve the minutes as amended was unanimously carried. 3. Citizens Comments/Petitions, Requests and Complaints. Mr. Stave Sunt, Wastewater Treatment Plant Manager for PSG, Inc., presented to the City Council a refund check of $3,196.07 covering the unused portion of the repair and maintenance budget for the year 1986. The City of Monticello contracts with PSG for maintenance and operation of the wastewater Treatment Plant, and the contract calls for a refund of any unused portion of the repair and maintenance budget. 6. Continuation of a Public Hearinq on an Amendment to the Tex Increment District 05 Finance Plan. At the last meeting in January, a public hearing was hold for the purpose of amending the Tax Increment District W5 Finance Plan that would allow for the construction of a 24 -unit and a 30 -unit apartment building. The proposed tax increments would be sufficient to pay for a $090,000 construction improvement project providing street and utilities. The original public hearing was continued to allow the other taxing jurisdictions such as the school district and Wright County the opportunity to comment on the Tax increment District Plan. Hearing no comments / from the public, the public hearing was closed. V Council Minutes - 2/9/87 i Motion was therefore made by Bill Fair, seconded by Dan Blonigen, i and unanimously carried to adopt a resolution amending the Finance Plan for Tax Increment District #5 as presented. See Resolution 87-4. 5. Consideration of Approving Plans and Specifications for Public Improvements in Construction Five Subdivision and Authorizing a Call for Bids. The consulting City Engineer prepared plane and specifications for the improvements to Lauring Lane, Washington Street, and Fallon Avenue in the area of the Construction Five Tax Increment Project. The project consists of construction of a new section of Lauring Lane through the gravel pit ending near the current civil defense siren site on Fallon Avenue. In addition, Fallon Avenue will be upgraded to a 36 -foot roadway with curb and gutter with a new entrance approximately 75-100 feet south of the existing entrance near the railroad tracks and Washington Street. Motion was made by Bill Fair, seconded by Warren Smith, and unanimously carried to adopt a resolution approving the plane and specifications as presented and authorizing an advertisement for bide. See Resolution 87-5. 6. Consideration of Ratifying the Appointment of Mr. Al Larson to the Monticello HRA. Recently, the HRA recommended appointment of Mr. Al Larson to fill a vacancy on the HRA committee. Motion was made by Bill Fair, seconded by Blonigen, and unanimously carried to ratify the appointment of Mr. Al Larson to fill the vacancy on the Monticello HRA, whose term will expire December 31, 1988. 7. Discussion on Invitation from Scandinavian Window Company. Mayor Grimsmo informed the Council that the Scandinavian Window Company, which has indicated it plane to build a facility in Monticello, has extended an invitation to the Mayor, City Administrator, and Economic Development Director, to visit Norway and their window facilities in that country May 2 through May 9, 1987. Mayor Grimsmo noted that the expenses for the trip would be paid for by the window company, and it was the consensus of the Council that the invited representatives of the City be allowed to attend. B. Consideration Of Final Payment to LindberA Paint Company. Recently, Lindberg Paint Company refinished the City Hall roof beams and decking. During the project, some extra cleaning work had to be completed because of overspray of materials. Mr. Lindberg's insurance company was responsible for the clean up and hired Service Master of Monticello. The final cleaning had been completed by Service Master; and as a result, Mr. Lindberg requested final payment on his work. L^� Council Minutes - 2/9/87 City staff members noted that the clean up process seemed completed: and as a result, motion was made by Blonigen, seconded by Fran Fair, and unanimously carried to approve the final payment to Lindberg Paint Company for the ceiling refinishing project in the amount of $4,897. 9. Discussion on Poet Office Expansion Proposal. Mayor Grimsmo noted that the City of Monticello has received notice from the Postal Service indicating the proposed plans for an expansion of the present Post Office facility or the building of a new larger facility at a new site in Monticello. The Postal Service would like to have at least 53,000 square feet of land to build a new 12,000 square foot building or acquire additional land at the present site for expansion. The three proposals currently under consideration are as follows: 1. Build a new building on a new site to be owned by the Postal Service. 2. Build a new building on a new site to be owned by a developer who then leases to the Post Office. 3. Expand the present facility and purchase additional land adjacent. i� City Administrator Eidem noted in contacts with the local Postmaster that they are agreeable to moot with City representatives to discuss the possibility of expansion at the present site, but he noted that the Postal Service in not sure expansion of the present site would be as feasible as building a new facility somewhere also. 10. Consideration of an Offer to Purchase the Old Fire Hall Buildinq. Dr. C.A. McCarty submitted an offer of 565.100 to purchase the old fire hall site on Cedar Street. City Administrator Eidem noted that the City's appraisal on the property was adjusted to $93,000 and noted that recently the City did receive an offer of $93,000 from Mr. Wayne Brinkman of National Bushing Company which did fall through due to problems being located near the Citv's well. AS a result, it was recommended that the purchase for 565,100 be rejected. The Council discussion turned to whether the City should actively seek selling the property or whether the property will be needed by other City departments such as water. Couneilmember Blonigan didn't think the location was suitable for the Public works Department to use and would be better suited for other commercial or retail activities in the downtown area. After further discussion, it was the consensus of the Council that Mr. McCarty's offer be rejected and directed the staff to locally advertiso the building for sale at the appraised value of 593,000. in addition, the Public Works Department was instructed to place for sale signs -on the building. - -•-•— --- -- --- e Council Minutes - 2/9/87 It. Consideration of Sharing in the Improvement Cost of Extension of Highway 25 from River Street to the New Mississippi River Bridge. A resolution was presented for Council consideration that would provide for a wider trunk highway from River Street to the Mississippi River as part of the planned MN/DOT improvements. A resolution indicates that the City would share in the extra improvements requested consisting of curb, gutter, base, surfacing, and storm sewer for that portion of Highway 25 extending from River Street to the bridge entrance. Motion was made by Bill Pair, seconded by Fran Fair, and unanimously carried to adopt the resolution. See Resolution.8773 Rick wolfateller/ Assistant Adminititrator Council Agenda - 2/23/87 d. Consideration of Authorizing Contract Execution with DMDI for Computer Acquisition and Awarding Leese Agreement Per Bid. (T.E.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: We have passed the eleventh hour on our computer search. All negotiations are virtually complete, and we feel we have a system we are ready to begin phasing in and learning to operate. Anne Carroll has done an excellent job in coordinating the entire process, and DMDI has been especially cooperative in responding to our needs. On Monday the 23rd, we will be reviewing the bide for the leasing agreement. Consequently, I cannot give you in-depth detail on all of the lease provisions until the night of the meeting. After considerable debate, Rick and I, in consultation with Anne and other cities, feel that a lease/purchase is the most effective method of acquiring a system. First, the City will not be faced with one single major expenditure all in 1987 or 1988. Rather, we will be looking at a set monthly payment for the next five year period. Second, the lease/purchase arrangement allows the City to enhance or upgrade a system in the process making only minor adjustments to the lease. For example, if we discovered that one of our terminale was inadequate for the particular station, we can simply exchange that for a different terminal and adjust the lease accordingly. We would not be faced with owning, and having to dispose of, a terminal q that we didn't vent. Such enhancements and/or modifications also 1� apply to software packages. Third, at the end of the five year lease, presuming that the system is equitable and functioning well, and serving the needs of the City, the City will acquire for one $1. Fourth, the Interest rate paid on the lease countered by the investment interest earned by not paying out in lump aum simply makes batter financial sense for the City. Presuming that the lease bide come in at an acceptable level land we have every reason to believe they will be acceptable), the Council is requested to authorizo the execution of a contract with DMDI for the licensing, supply, and support maintenance for both software and hardware for the City of Monticello. In addition, the Council is requested to authorize execution of a lease/purchase agreement with the lowest responsible bidder. Anticipating approval at this meeting, the City can expect to begin receiving the system by the and of March. D. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Proceed with the computer acquisition. 2. Delay acquisition for further investigation. 3. Cancel. no tC. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: C Council Agenda - 2/23/87 Staff recommends the Council authorize execution of the necessary documents so the City may proceed to automate its functions. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Cost analysis summary; contract summary supplied under separate cover; lease terms to be supplied by Monday evening. -2- L Tha last time Ane Carroll was before the Council, some Council members seemed to stiln l be reluctant to accept the notion of substantial savings through automation; you requested that a comparative analysis be done to show some real cost savings. The attached shoats were prepared by Anne and me. She did the time projections; I did the wage/savings extensions where applicable. Again, this is a general indicator, not a comprehensive study of every possible function. 0 CARROLL, FRANCK & Assow s TRMMING. ENGINEERING. AND KANMNG 533IAUM AVE., st KUL. MN 551 a2 612.228-9151 TO: Monticello City Cnin:il FROM: Anne Carrollt� RE: Comparative Analysis: Examples of present processes and procedures vs. new computerized processes and procedures DATE: 6 February 1987 Deputy Registrar Daily Reports: Currently, Diane completes a multi -column State form manually, listing all required information for each license plate or tab. Approximately 20,000 are processed each year. All fees are computed manually, including the fee split between the State and the City. These computations take 15 minutes each. All searches for sticker rulbers are done manually and take 5-15 minutes each Searches cannot be performed by name. With the new system, computations are performed automatically (and error -free) in a matter of seconds. Searches by either name or sticker number take less than 1 minute each. Utility Billing: Currently, all readings, billings, and reference took -ups are done manually for 1,600 accounts. The billing process (updates, all payments, refunds, adjustments, delinquent notices, new readings, bills, etc.) takes 120 hours each quarter. Each request for Information about a particular account takes 20 minutes. With the new system, the billing process (updates, all payments, refunds, adjustments, delinquent notices, new readings, printout of bills, etc.) will take 30-40 hours. Each request for information about an account will take less than 1 minute. Financial Reporting (GAAFR Report): The auditing firm charges approximately $3,000 a year to compile the data and produce this special State -required report. With the new -system, we will save this entire amount fee after the first year. Property Activity: Currently, Gary goes to the County every month and picks up a list of property activity (such as changes in homesteads, certificates of real estate value, lot splits, etc.). He then spends an hour hard-enpying the changes into the City's property reference book. He can't find out about subdivision parcel numlier reassignments until tax assessment time. Searches for specific properly information) are done manually, and take is -60 minutes each. With the new system, updated property information will be automatically loaded onto the City's computer system. Searches for specific property Information or characteristics will take less than 1 minute each. Jas Costing: Essentially, this involves the compilation and analysis of labor, equipment, and materials uasape by location, time, perem and cost. Curantly, when this can be done at all, It Is done manually. } 1 With,the new system,.usage data can be captured immediately, and the results of t the computerized analysis are available in time to be useful. This will contribute to better decisions about efficient and cost-effective labor distribution; equipment* use; acquisition, and maintenance, and materials purchasing. Word Processing: Currently, support staff types all memos, reports, agendas, etc., on electric or electronic typewriters. Manges require corplete retyping subsequently doubling (at least) the time required to produce any document that is modified. With the new system, all documents will be produced using word processing. This allows the storage of documents in the computer system, so that staff need only enter the modifications, not retype the entire document. This will result In at least a 2S% reduction of typing time for documents that are modified. In addition, the keyboard on the computer is actually 'faster' than a typewriter keyboard, allowing a 10-2S@ increase in typing speed. *madsttaet: Cure►tty, any accounting or other use of a matrix (row and column) display and calculation is done manually and with an electronic calculator. Major changes or what -if questions require complete rewriting. Calculation accuracy depends upon the accuracy of the data entry to the calculator; to check calculations, all numbers must be reentered With the new system, matrix displays and calculations will be done on a computerized spreadsteet. All calculations are automatic and error -free. Changes and what -if analyses are done by entering the charges only, and/or electronically 1 copying the spreadsheet and entering alternative data or formulas. U 61 DEPUTY REGISTRAR Manual computations - Auto. computations - Savings - Manual search - Auto. search - Savings - S 2.50 ea. .16 ea - S 2.36 per computation S .83 - 2.50 ea. .16 aa. S .67 - 2.34 ea. Manual daily reports 13 hrs) - S 30.00 Auto. daily reports - 15.00 Savings - $ 15.00 UTILITY BILLING Manual billing - $4,800.00 annually 120 Ars/Qtr. Auto. billing - $1,600.00 annually 40 hre/Qtr. Savings - $3,200.00 annually Manual account inquiry - S .83 - 2.50 Auto. account inquiry - .16 Savings - S .67 - 2.34 PROPERTY ACTIVITY (Involves all personnel ranging from $8.00/hr - $21.00/hr) Manual inquiry - (2.25-5.25) to (9.00-21.00) Auto inquiry - 151 to 350 Savings - Anywhere from $2.10 to $20.65 per search depending on staff person. CV) Council Agenda - 2/23/87 S. Consideration of an Application for a 3.2 Beer Off -sale License - Applicant, Red Owl Stores. (R.w.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The former operators of the Red Owl Store in the Monticello Mall (Service Plus Foods) recently vent out of business, and the Red Owl Corporation has taken over the store and plane on re -opening the store in the near future. The Red Owl Corporation is currently remodeling the facility and will re -open in the near future under the name Fresh Mart Foods. The corporation has applied for a 3.2 Off -sale Beer License for the operation, similar to the past operators. Although the store will currently be operated as a corporate owned store, Red Owl Is seeking individuals who are interested in operating the store an a private enterprise. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: I. The first alternative would be to approve a 3.2 Off -sale Beer License for the Red Owl Corporation which would expire July 1, 1987. The annual license fee would be S25 pro -rated until July 1. 2. The second alternative would be to deny the license. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the 3.2 Bear License application be approved for the balance of the year. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of license application. 3 -3- CITY OF t-11ONTICELL0 LICENSE APPLICATION This application is being submitted for the following license(s) : Set-up license off -sale, non -intoxicating liquor On -sale, intoxicating liquor on -sale, wine On -sale, non -intoxicating liquor On -sale, wine/3-2 beer Applicant Name Age! Date: Applicant Address:c, cn-� -,4 o 2 L Phone: \Av Name of Business: Address of Business. a04 W Business Phone:.(P\� Describe nature of business operation: If Corporation: Officers: kNoa Directors: Do you or does your corporation, partnership, etc., currently hold any license allowing the sale Of wine, intoxicating liquor, non -intoxicating liquor, or set -UPS? V yes no If yes: Nana of Business: Ree\ MZC' - Address of Business Cw 'e— Phone: SP\C Type Of License: (;S Years held: 14*1 References: Name Address Telephone Number Credit References (list at least one bank you do business with) Name Address Telephone Number Amount of investment, excluding land: (Only applicants for on -sale, intoxicating liquor must provide this information) Have you ever been convicted of a felony, or of violating the National Prohibition Act or any State lav or ordinance relating to manufacture or transportation of intoxicating liquors: I declare that the above information is true and correct, to the best of my knowledge. IEkr" .. o �) m* row .0 r - , Applicant Signature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . For City Use Only Surety Bond Liquor Liability Certificate of Insurance Application Fee License Fee Sheriff, Wright County Data Mayor, city of Monticallo City Administrator 0 Council Agenda - 2/23/87 6. Consideration of a Proposal for a Simple Subdivision - Applicant, Nick Kampa. (G.A.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Nick Kampa, represented by Mr. Dan Fria, will be before you with a simple subdivision request to subdivide an existing residential lot into two residential lots. The proposed simple subdivision request does meet the minimum requirements of our ordinance as presented. A couple of questions that do come to mind are the shoving for Parcel B an ingress and egress easement for the existing gravel driveway, and secondly, they are proposing a future driveway to service Parcel A with a driveway coming off of County Road 39. The proposed future driveway for the house on Parcel A could be in conflict with the distance of an existing driveway immediately south of this Parcel A. A recommendation from the Wright County Engineering Department is that they would like to have a minimum distance of 20 feet between the culvert ends of the two driveways. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Approve the simple subdivision request as presented. 2. Deny the simple subdivision request as presented. 3. Approve the simple subdivision request with the following conditions: a. The proposed ingress and egress easement going across Parcel B to service the garage on Parcel A be eliminated. b. The proposed future driveway to service the house on Parcel A be set at a dietanco as recommended by the Wright County Engineering Office. c. Futuro services for the existing house in Parcel A be installed prior to the reconstruction of West County Road 39 during the spring of 1987. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the simple subdivision request to subdivide an existing residential lot into two residential lots. Staff recommends that no ingress/agreso easement be granted to Parcel A going across Parcel B to service the existing garage on Parcel A. Staff also recommends a dietanco of at least 20 feat for the proposed future driveway away from the existing driveway immediately south of the proposed future driveway. We would like to see the services running to the existing house on Parcel A put in sometime during the reconstruction of West County Road 39 in the spring of 1987. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the Certificate of Survey; Copy of the location of the simple subdivision request; copy of the minutes of the Planning Commission. -4- 0 N of • a, SQ,"- E --`,: !� Vi N � O,frrlJ r�V 4 • til t.Jn ' >=` � 0. a de*✓.ecr ► 0 fA' tt ro V p 4 ow 0 O I�fA�ov.•f� � svi rsx.rr /�w►wrlvl+'ri _ + �O +� J i• K' 22r w �y • CAST' LINE Or ROT 2 XA.�lf�i4 t1r!'GLE ' ' Simple Subdivision Request to subdivide an existing residential lot Into two residential lots. Nick Kamp&. �o A Planning Commission Minutes - 2/10/87 O. Simple Subdivision Reouest to subdivide an existing residential lot into two residential lots. Applicant, Nick Kamma. Mr. Dan Frio was present to propose the lot subdivision request for .Mr. Nick Kampa. Mr. Fria indicated the proposed subdivision request would be to subdivide the existing residential lot into two residential late by subdividing the existing residential lot east and vest. Planning Commission member Jim Ridgeway questioned as to the need for an ingress and egress easement for the gravel driveway to service the existing garage on this residential lot. Mr. Fria indicated the whole intent of the ingress and egress easement was to utilize the existing garage until the newly created subdivided residential lot would be sold and a future house built. Motion by Jim Ridgeway, seconded by Barbara Koropchak, to approve the simple subdivision request to subdivide an existing residential lot into two residential lots, with the following conditions: 1) the existing driveway off of west County Road 39 be abandoned In Parcel 8 and relocated in Parcel A to service the existing house: there be no access granted to Parcel A for ingress and egress driveway samoment to the existing garage across Parcel B. Motion carried unanimously. 9 Council Agenda - 2/23/87 i .� 7. Consideration of a Proposal for a Simple Subdivision - Applicant, Russell Lovegren. (G.AJ A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Russell and Carol Lovegren are proposing to subdivide their residential lots to create two residential lots. The lots which the Lovegren's are proposing to subdivide are existing lots that were platted as part of the original platting in the City of Monticello. These lots were platted with a lot width of 66 feet and a depth of 165 feet for a total lot square footage of 10,890 square feet. In looking at the applicant's request, I think we should look at this as Subdividing residential lots that were of a different lot width and lot square footage than the minimum lot width and square footage that is required today. In the proposed lot split as shown on Parcel A. that lot would meet the minimum requirements of a residential lot at that time, 10,890 square feet. with the creation of a new lot, which is called Parcel B. this lot would be well in excess of the minimum requirements of the existing original lots and also of existing lots as they are platted today. In looking at this request, I think we should look at the existing square footage and lot sizes that were in effect when the lots were platted. Keeping that in mind with the request as submitted, the simple subdivision of these residential lots would meet the minimum requirements of the ordinance. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Approve the simple subdivision request to subdivide residential Iota into two residential lots. 2. Deny the simple subdivision request to subdivide existing lots Into two residential lots. 3. Approve the simple subdivision request to subdivide residential lots into two residential lots with the following conditions: a. Prior to issuance of a building permit on Parcel B, the existing garage be torn down and removed from Parcel B. b. If a new house is constructed on Parcel B, the house be constructed so as to not nood any typo of variance whatsoever. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the simple subdivision request to subdivide tho existing lot into two residential Sots. In reviewing the applicant's request and looking at the land that was available with this, and this being part of the original platting of the City of Monticello, we base our recommendation on the existing applicant'e request. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the location of the simple subdivision request, copy of the site plan; copy of the Monticello Planning Commission meeting minutes. .5- J � ur�c,ry I I I I Ic PA2Ct-L f — ufLir�ln6�ir m a N I , — jeI (A o q I W RA i 6 sa r O 3RD STQEET moi• Planning Commission Minutes - 2/10/87 5. Siople Subdivision Request to subdivide existing residential lots into two residential lots. Applicant. Russell Lovegren. Mr. Russell Lovegren, along with his real estate agent, Mr. Larry Carter, was present to propose his request to subdivide the existing lots at his residence into two residential lots. Mr. Carter explained the subdivision request indicating to Planning Commission members that Parcel A would be less than the minimum 12,000 square foot residential lot size required by ordinance today, but it would meet the existing residential lot size when these lots were originally platted. The Parcel B lot would be well in excess of the 12,000 square foot residential lot requirement. Services to the proposed Parcel 8 would be run on the street easement along the vest side of Minnesota Street to service Parcel B. Much discussion centered between Planning Commission members on creating more square footage with Parcel A. an the total square footage for Parcel A as presented was 10,890 square feet. City staff had recommended that no variances vara needed in this case, as the land when it was originally platted =rested 66 x 165 foot lots, which to equal to �- 10,890 square feet. Commission members did bring up a good point, however, that Mr. Lovagren does not have two residential 66 x 165 foot lots as they were originally platted. Questions were also raised of a possibility of creating the 11 feet which he is short for his second lot on west Third Street with the adjoining property owner and giving the adjoining property owner 10 feet across the back of his adjoining property owner's property. Discussion was also centered around whether the a xisting garage on Parcel B would remain. Planning Commission members felt very strongly that this should be added as e condition that them garage on Parcel B be removed on or before the sale of the Parcel 13. After much discussion, Commission members came to the consensus that if the land would be traded it would have to be dealt between Mr. Lovegran and the now property owner immediately northwest of his residential property to create any type of residential land swapping to be even more conforming on lot square footage. Motion by Barbara Koropchak, seconded by Richard Martis, to approve the simple subdivision request to subdivide an existing residential lot into two resideratial lots, with the following conditions: 1) with the subdivision of the residential lots into two residential lots that a residential land sale of Parcel 8 occur within 120 days; 2) if a new house in constructed on Parcel B, the now house be laid out on Parcel B so as to not need any type of variance in regard to setbacks whatsoever; 3) prior to application of a building permit to construct a now house on Parcel B. the existing garage be removed. Motion carried unanimously. U Council Agenda - 2/23/87 S. Consideration of an Application to Renew a Gambling License - Applicant, Monticello American Legion. (T.E.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: As you are aware, the State of Minnesota now issues Charitable Gambling Licenses. Before any new license or renewal is granted, a copy of the application must be submitted to the City and 30 days granted for objection by the local government. This request is an application from the American Legion who currently sells pull tabs at the Monticello Liquors. Original approval was granted approximately a year ago. No complaints have been received by the City for this gambling activity. Providing all information complies with state law, the State will grant the license unless it receives a statement from the City objecting to it within 30 days of filing. If you have no objection to the renewal of this license, then no action is required. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Take no action; State will renew the license. 2. Pile an objection with the State of Minnesota. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that no action be taken. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the application form. -6- A Ch&k" Gwnbft Control Ooerd &-�, flown N475 Gft — &Adft WN USE ONLV gzAlldway 1821 UnNwW* Xvjinaw St. PaLd.Minnesota' 55lO4-33W (0121642-0555 GAMUMOUCENSEAPFUCATION DATF 4L. QNSIRUCTOM: A. T"ocrprJMlnh*. 8. Umr.1, appkstiontobeat — bolt obtWnWWowmend den onag=pimw4bmlcopy AppkMkOMI cwv and sands angbW to the shove eddreaa With o'chodL C. kcamVew WUCS*m wiU be rowmecL Type of APPOcaft: 11, Opus A'— f;so$100.00Mbw.RsffbmPMMMW�.TWbimids.PA-u") GFCWUB— Vol 50.000Wft.Padfflewhsob,TWbmnb.PdkMnI ocbuc— swo 50.00mirwad" OCmD— *n$ 25.0001ef0n~ appUcsOmfor arartworal? 11 was, give complete ftonss number O*sDN* 2. It Oft Is not on spotation for a rwwwM. has crawdration been licartsed by the BCW bBfom? llvqv,"basm A learm ulow On dWts) DftC3N* 3. Have MWrtd Contraft been wbwJnod wwvioLW llfno. Onno aftam cc 4., Appkm (OffloW.1againems of 5. Business Adi#ess of OrpnWRIon C." B. &tWr!as,Fhw%Numbw A I )V,� "I I 9. Typeoforgardzution: OkstwW IUV@twM ORMORMA 130dwrortpmM* DYWOND 10, tiorgonttatim baci nwyibw:: Attach e-Dovotcomflom, C3VMQMo 11. Are artiffles fled with the Secratlov of Stuai FJ1Mf3No 12, Are ardelas fited with Va Countv?- ftwomm deo"p axs!rd)tion or copy al 090 or SO= ~aNthataocov, 'CLovends6. CRrq*od, .0vaidets!"I 18. Num IS, mantwof VON—ilnvjuwm Apon, 111-uthomfowwomette"",; 'T. IS.'Nem al asnumaraeftn Wft momolls too" few"" 4Ci A 1 -'0' P i" ,.G(O\ * v CL & &Nftm"wmwumw is. rA z a 21. L nku,4- el , Ic Mo claol-11- WAftCspv4kW v -A rmo GUOSUPram atsnew 20. $VMS" tnet r.0.9as oh~ comary l.ra wneuW9aewrsrtSltop Nags'2 6 0011311 C 00*0 -�`vi*Ofto 23. tsgwrMhVDrwntmbested wfflmchVfwft? ©No 24. Are an gambling ectivities conducted at the promises listed in 018 of this apolcation? If nM;coffotft a separate- `10 a Met a= squirw Bch remissm pplication for each prandsax foxcei raffles) as age ofic car fore 0 x3VbsQWG 25. Does amortization own the garnbling promises? It no. attach COPY of the lesis with terms of at least are year.-, 26. Does tftwgw4mionfeenthewraro"rAbn?lfno,,macfto'gkvtchoI27. Amount at morantir Ram: 1010 Promises inditalft what portion is ft is net reaufrod for Class D applications.beWased. A leads and sketch ,I I 1(;0_1 13VbsQOro 28. Do you plan an conducting bingo with Me licarts 7 lives. tiveasys and Cmvsofblnp occasions*. can rkm la%*131lo 29. Has the 8 10,000 fidelltv bond rettulter! by Minnesota Statute* 349.20 been obtained? Attach copy of bond. 30. Insurance Company Name 4- 31, Bond Number 32.. Lessor Nam 33., Address 1344..: _Ptv. State,ft 3S. GxnWhVM-"drNsm& 3 Address 3 ..City.State.74 . : �r% + �x f I ft LcH­ Ili /J: R—Gaft" Menem Bualness Phor 139. hate ga'Wbtg member of argsnizirtW: L GAMBMCISMAUTHORIZATION SYMY signature bolaw, local law onforeernant officers or agents of the Board we hereby authorized to enterii0on the site, at any time, gambling Is being conducted, to observe the gambling andto o9force the law for env Unauthorized Off" or, practice. I - I the I -,.- BANK fMC6ltOSAMOIMTION1 : Qv my signature below. the Board Is hereby authorized to Insoact the bank records of the Gerimal Gernbling Bank Account henever necessary to fulfill fequirsitharre of current gambling MM and_". OATH I hereby declare titit.- 1. 1 have rood this i;p�knion and 00 InformattImsubrnittill tdth,e Board;' ,2;, � Ali Information submitted Is true, accurate and emplets; 3. -Ali other, fe(Wred Information has been fully dUlosed A., '11 am the chief exacwtive officer of the orpntzstion,,� S. I "BUNIMIS 6A ratOwlsWUltV for the fair and lawifuloparraticinof aU eEtiyhtai tobsco4uietad;' ,8. 1 will familiarize myself with the tows& the StIfts of Minnesota respectirlig gambling snd,ruies of the 'Board andegres, if licans6d.10 abide by those Iowa and rulac-Includino amendments thOrsto." 11 44081 Name Of Organitation. 41, SOuture o"M be Wgnoo by Chief Eascuthre Officerl Jj 3st Titloolsigner, k12lul- 1­4 k&ftdWUD"MW OF NOTICE fly LOCAL GOyMMINn BODY I hereby acknoWedoe-rkslot of a Copy of this application. By atknOwtedging receipt, 4 admit tuoilho been served with notice that this ap iC$tlon will be reviewed by the Charitable Gambling Control Board and If $*proved by the board. Wil, become of 38 days from the dartsof maim (noted below), unless a resolution of the local governing body is passed WhIeWspecifically disallows -such activity and'a Copy of that resolution Is received by the,Chstitable Gmft-Ur%g Control, -Soard within ;0 days of the below firatid data. 62. 'Name of CRY of -county ft=al Govs!nho oovl'- If site Is faceted within a township; hem 43 mum be conallsted, in addition to the County s4rurture, o 42, Name at tawrato ,pon" of person recwft gdo ad title We recailved 430 day oe"ad SOurturo of plasim recolvWq spohostlen be ftmttodoet yl� IfT It 1"1.17 4Mpr C04=142 (Iasi Who CQ"4k" I ; 4po"Awasom ft&4A§WGBVRWJM$odv Council Agenda - 2/23/87 v_ 9. Consideration of Authorizing Finance Director to Attend a Conference. A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The National Government Finance Officers Association Annual Conference will be held in Washington D.C. May 30 through June 3, 1987. As Finance Director for the City of Monticello. I have been a member of the Minnesota GFOA for over ten years. and the City of Monticello is a member of the National GFOA as well. I have annually attended the Minnesota GFOA conferences and the monthly meetings held throughout the year on a regular basis and have found these to be beneficial and worthwhile opportunities to meet and discuss with other finance officers throughout the state. Many times information can be obtained from other finance officers from these meetings. Although I have not previously attended a National GFOA Conference, $1,000 was included in the 1987 budget for this purpose. In order to receive the lover registration fee, and to insure that accommodations are available, I am requesting your authorization at this time so an early registration can be submitted. Until an actual registration is mailed, exact cost on accommodations and travel expenses is not known, but the total cost is estimated to be $1,000 including the registration fee, hotel, and transportation costa. A, The conference has scheduled over 50 concurrent sessions covering topics ranging from cash management (investment procedures), budgeting, auditing and accounting procedures, two sessions covering computer applications and computer conversions. The wide variety of topica will provide me with an opportunity to select those that pertain to the City -s operation and also enable me to meet and discuss with other national finance directors. S. ALTERNATIVE. ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative would be to authorize the Finance Director to attend the National Conference scheduled May 30 through June 3. 2. The second alternative would be to not authorize attendanco at this conference. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: None. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the Conference agenda. -7- Communicating Your Community to the Rating Agencies. The effectiveness Of your oresentonon to the rdtug OgenCies COula affect '/Our IunsoiCnon s Cfeait rating. Leom what the rc-nng agencies are looking for an0 tecnniaues tot improving your presentation skills PENSION AND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT ADMINISTRATION Policy and Practice in Public Pension Funding and Reporting. The Governmental Accounting Stonooras Board's Statement 5, relating to me disclosure of pension information by public emplayee retirement systems and state aro local government employers. wll cnange disclosure requirements for most retirement systems. These changes and the results of the GFOA Public Penson Ono Benefits Consortium survey of accounting, reporting and funding practices of public pension funds will be dlscussea. Pension Fund Performance Measures Pension tuna managers need to be conversant lam the latest techniaues for measuring oorffoll0 performance. The session wll Include discussion of performance measures for flxed- Income ono oqulty, investments venture Capital. real estate and international Investments The Investment Management Decblon: Internal vs. Esromal Management. Pension fund trustees often are faced wAth the oacision of whether pension Investments should 00 managed internally or externally. This session will explore the various options Ono the role of trustees In the management cocision The Session will Include CUCunon of methods for selecting and evaluating extOmol fund managers Communicating Pension and benefit Information to Retirement System Members. Pension administrators often are called upon to provioe pre• ono post-retirement counseling ton retirement system members Proc-rcol advice on counseling and eslabnaning effectNo Communications with mombors well be hgnugntoa, COMPUTERS FOR FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Computer Software to Pension and Benefit Administration. Many different types of Computer sottwgre row are ovallable to help governments Dominator benefit programs fp their employees This session will pravrao on Overview Of the somvoro Capabilities or ponsion records and Calculations. health Care IMnents, team accruals and valuation, aro other related programs Microcomputer System Security. Until d problem arras. many microcomputer users a0 not Consider the need fon system security. The season will Include a discussion at techniques to Improve the systom security and data Integrity, ohnee-aanDing and linked mlcrocomputon Implementing a Smooth Computer System Conversion. Horror stones OOounO regaraing the experiences at governments Converting nom one Computer system to anomer. This session Moll explore ways fie Conversion process COn be maoe rambler, less traumatic Ono less cosh for governments Preparing Your Comprehensive Annual Financial Report on a Microcomputer Using Lotus 1'21, Marry smaller junsoicnons can prepare their comprehensive annual financial reports on microcomputers using Lotus 1.2.3 software. This session will praviae practical CCvice for those who are considering this method SMALL CITY FOCUS Special Problems In Implementing GAAP In Small Cities. Despite limited staff dna resources finance omcefs in smaller tunsaictions are expeveo to remain current on generally accepted CCCounnng primites This session vAll provide guidance on topics such as Converting from cash to accrual basis and the reaunements of GASB pronouncements ACCountls�g and Financial Reporting for Small CIM Internal SeMce Funds. Internal service fu as provide on accurate momoo of tracking the Costs of prcmCing services for specific municipal functions This session U Designed to asrast you in setting up Ono maintaining internal service tunal Among the topics to be covered are which Services to include, how these 10"Ces ShMIC be CWOC Ona no. the financial Data anoula be reported. Cash Management fa Small Cities. In smaller junsoiclons 11 Is especialry Important to develop on effective cash management program This session is Designed to provide practical Dawo on setting up a workabie Investment policy. using simple cosh forecasting models Ono microcomputers Choosing a Deferred Compensation Plan. Deterred comoensonan pion& offer On amacinm anernmve for many smaller lunsCIC-ons this session is designed to help finance officials Wennty and arnaMe the available calerrod Compensation options Methods of evaluating and selecting a pian manager ciso will be discussed MANAGEMENT Bridging the Credibility Gap In Prow Relotlom. too often fiance official& New members Of the ofetl a$ the enemy Loam wogs to Develop a muruOtly beneficial working relationship with local reporters Ota ealtors TOChnaues tar handling Orion feleaY&s, pass conferences uta Interviews will 00 covered. Getting your Message Anotia: Medio Techniques Delivery techniques tot tolevslon. Coble and roob appearances will be the fOC&O Of INS sesuon. Preparing fa the appearance, effective delivery fechnlDUOD and the use of graphic support will to featured CONFERENCE TIMETABLE For your planning purposes. me general scnecule is as follows' 9,30am.-1:300m Saturday, May 30. 1987 ono 3 p.m - 5 b m Morning&Afternoon •Standing • Forums Ono Committees 100, n. -6 pm • RegisilcTion 3pm-60m 411 Exhibits Sunday, May M. 1987 9 cm. -0om •Registration 9,30am.-1:300m 40 Exhibits ono 3 p.m - 5 b m Afternoon • Forums Ono Sessions Evening 0welcome Reception Monday, June 1, 1987 8 am. - 5 om • Registration 930a.m-1:30 pm •Emlbits and 3 p.m - 5 pm Morning • Opening General Session arra Concurrent Sessions Noon *Lunch In Exhibit Nall Afternoon 0 Concurrent Sessions FREE EVENING fuesd June 2, 1987 Both. - 3 a.m. 411 Registration eam.-3o.m •Exhibm Morning 0General Session and Concurrent Sessions Noon Lunch Ono Annual Business Meeting Afternoon •Concurrent Semon Evening • Event Sponsored by 1987 Local Conference Committee Wednesday. June 3. 1987 Morning •Concurrent Sessions Noon •Adjournment J - 81st Annual Conference May 31 -June 3, 1987 Washington, D.C. THE FINANCE OFFICER AS COMMUNICATOR The ability to communicate effectrvety has become a key factor in determining the success of todcWs finance Official The role OI the finance DrOteSsiOnal has become more demanding with the growing sophistication of taxpayers, 99pvemiflg bodies one rile media Complex ,sues and financial inlormetian must be analyzed and disseminated to omen It is important to be up to date on the latest teChniaues end technology. but unless you can convey that knowlecJpo to others. It U lost. The fate of yaw cllys fiscal health could depend not only on now, well you analyze budget Octel. but also on flow convincingly, you present the Information. The perception of your )unscilctbn's financial position Tb me rating agencies can be Impacted by the strength of your communications savvy. Effective communication a achieved bV knowing how arse what topreseni to a particular audience. GFONs 1987 annual conference Is designed to assist you on two fronts e To bring you up to date On me latest Issues techMques and technology In 6over�ment financial monagement. e Ta help you develop the COmmuni• cotton skins that will enable you to effectively transfer your knOwieOge one convoy your (urisdiCtloils message. PRECONFERENCE SEMINAR The GFOA Career Development Center will sponsor Mia seminars on May 29.30. 1987. at the Sheraton Washington Wosnington DC. A One -OW Creative, mora emenI seminar will be held on May -^/. This session is designed to assist finance omcem In exploring then own creativity ane In eliminating the portion mat limit staff members. Creative responses to problems A two -adv seminar, UD -To -Date Capital Financing: After me Tax Reform Act, will be hob On May `19.30 This sommar will address the Issue of the affect Of the Tax Reform Act of 1980 on store and local government financing for capital needs Seminars will begin of 9 am and conclude at aDprOxlmatOtq 5 am, Full details will be sent to all GFOA mornoors In early 1987. It you are not a GFOA member one are Interested In omonding this training prof el" contact the GFOA Career OovetopmeN Conan, 180 N Wan Avenue, Suite 800. Chicago, IL 00001.7070 (3121977.9700(. Advance registration will be roauired, CONCURRENT SESSIONS More man 50 concurrent sessions will be held in engin time penoas on Sunday. Monday. ues0cry and Wednesday. May 31 -June 3 The follovnng is a Denial Iaty g by tracks of mese sessions Omer sessions win at Ocoee to reflect new bales as they devefdp ACCOUNTING. AUDITING • FINANCIAL REPORTING GASB UpcIato. Thu sesvon will provide an overview of me Gcvemmental. Accounting Standards Boards (GASB) recent pronouncements and the status of current projects. Single Audit - Implementation Is Nov. This is the year governmental units are required to mWlement the Single Audit Act. The session will incJtlde a review of Me new regulations and what is necessary fa complicince. Plonrung for the cuadlf an o the reldrlansND3 between 1ne govenlrtentol unit arra the auditor also will be covered. - Audit Proicurernetst _ The First step to Quality Audlta Recent US. General Accounting Office stuWes Indicated major oreas of concern in the duality of aunts The American Insmure of Cernned Public Accountants resoonaed by Issuing Oud,t Quality recommendations This session wn review model requests for prorbsaafor cudln and other useful guidelines ler unprovng audit quality. Accounting and Financial Reporting for Self-insurance and Insurance Pools. Win the rising costs of thio-oorty, kllurance. many governments are fuming to sen -insurance and Insurance ooOb t0 Ora+lae 0031C COverage, Proper procedures fa accounting one financial reoomng of mese Insurance OC1M11e5 vas be, the foam of this sossion. BUDGETING AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT CormmurNcating Budget Information ElFoctlhotV. Finance officials, omen are laced with the cnallonge of presorting comolen financial Information to oiocled officials one the Cubic. The use at chain and groans and other techniques lot increating the unaarstanaing of bucW materials will be MghligntOO. Utility FTrwticlal Management. Establishing and maintaining a self-sufficient utility realdres careful financial planning fvlomoas of costing water one Iewer services and enveloping one rmanoging public support fat rate increases VIII be CISCusteO. the Meda to Gavial reserves ane teplocemanl lot= also will be Included. 61suraric• AnaNnanves The liability insurance crab has tacoo many govemmienh to soak alterrathre methods to Maintaining twedudro "is of Insurance. This session win include Cltaasion of tisk and exposure aaeomenl —now IOCllmaues in solf•Insunr o such m the use Of debt and ntorluueClctonal grouping of funds Revenue Management. Sound revenue management begins with the Oeyelooment of C strategic financial pion Experts will Ciscuss the elements of SYategic financial planning, including mo aevelooment of local revenue enhancement progrcnu Revenue enforcement and cmnesty programs also wit be Covered_ CASH MANAGEMENT Short-term investment strategies. Current tecnniaues for mcxlm¢mg me return on short-term investments will be me focus at this session yield curve analysts, swabs. technical systems one Orbltrage investment will be discussed, Prudent Investing. The safely of Investments is a key concern for casn managers Techruoues for safeguarding Investments through internal controls, master repo agreements safekeeping arra Custodial agreements will be hlghlightea Investment Inatrumenh Cash managers are faced with an ever-inCrOas ng number of Investment options such asmortgage-hocked securites. stare Investment OOOb aria Collateralized commercial paper. flaw these Investments work one the risks they pose to Investors will be discussed. The use of tax-exempt bonds as Investment Instruments also will be covered. Noir to Read and Use Financial Information. Loam he. to get me most out of reading the Well Street Journal. The Bona Buyer and Omer financial publications DEBT AND FISCAL POLICY Technical Issues In Arbitrage and Advance Refundings. Charges in me tan law win affect the advance refunding of aobf and the Investment of bona proceeds This session will Cover the new rules. methods to achieve compliance and Opportlarltes fon Improving cleat administration Is There a Future for Privatization under the Now Tax Low? Recent changes In fox law Once again have Offered the landscape of oubliuCtrvate cooperation in Capitol finance This semen will teviow current privarlzation options, focusing On the Opportunities ono piffalis of vonous loosing arrangements and puollc/prNote options In Wile vraAe disposal. Taxable Municipals: Options for Issuers. While taxofye municipal bonds nave been the pOnaoro in Canada Jurisdictions In me United Slaves are Just beginning to explore the toxdbl0 market. This session will provide an ovemew Of me tdtoble bona market. Including me 00"Orq and ODDortulvttes ahO the choice Of pomelln vs loreign markets. (a I ti// 1987 -- GENERAL FUND -- FEBRUARY AMOUNT CHECK NO. Monticello T. W. Hdwe. - Supplies 3.91 23753 OSM - Engineering fees 3,486.04 23754 Roger Mack - Amway purchases 108.75 23755 American Freight System - Cabinet for Sen. Citizen bldg. 40.90 23756 St. Michael Vet Clinic - Animal control expenses 36.50 23757 Wilbur Eck - Dewatering sever at rental home on Cedar St. 1,000.00 23758 U. S. Postmaster - Postage. 500.00 23759 Liquor Fund - Reimbursement for Savings to liquor fund 175.34 23760 Pierce Mfg. Co. - Elect. motor rewind - Fire Dept. 177.28 23761 Scott Douglas - Reimb. for Fire Dept. supplies 21.23 23762 McDowall Co. - Furnace repair at City Hall 6 Fire Hall 348.50 23763 Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees 82.00 23764 VOID -0- 23765 Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees 40.00 23766 Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees 22.00 23767 Corrow Sanitation - Garbage contract payment 6,506.50 23768 State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll dad. 123.04 23769 ICMA Retirement Corp. - Payroll dad. 183.34 23770 Olson 6 Sons Electric - Repairs - mise. locations 283.52 23771 OSM - Engineering fees 318.56 23772 Jerry Hermes - Janitorial at library 216.67 23773 David Stromberg - Animal control payment 287.50 23774 Mrs. Beverly Johnson - Animal cnnerol contract 275.00 23775 Wright County State Bank - FWT taxes 4,762.40 23776 Commissioner of Revenue - SWT 2,104.00 23777 Mr. Arve Grimsmo - Mayor salary 175.00 23778 Mr. Dan Blonlgen - Council salary 125.00 23779 Mrs. Fran Fair - Council salary 125.00 23780 Mr. William Fair - Council salary 125.00 23781 Mr. Warren Smith - Council salary 123.19 23782 Mr. James Ridgeway - Planning Comm. salary 49.27 23783 Mr. Richard Martie - Planning Comm. salary 49.27 23784 Me. Joyce Dowling - Planning Comm. salary 49.27 23785 Mr. Richard Carlson - Planning Comm. salary 49.27 23786 Ms. Barbara Koropchak - Planning Comm. salary 49.27 23787 State Treasurer - PERA 1,389.74 23788 Business 6 Ind. Dev. Comm. - 1986 contribution from City 4,800.00 23789 Melchert/Block Assoc. - Eng. fees for Chelsea Road ext. 907.52 23790 Corrow sanitation - Add. contract fees for Jan. 1,188.20 23791 Arlan Willie /Hockey Assoc. - Reimb. for hockey costs 325.14. 23792 Anoka County Social Services - Payroll dad. 204.00 23793 James Preusse - Cleaning city hall 358.33 23794 YMCA of Mpla. - Monthly contract payment 583.33 23795 Professional Services Group - WWTP contract payment 22,083.35 23796 Bridgewater - Telephone 831.60 23797 North Central Public Service - Utilities 1.939.77 23798 Unitog Rental Service - Uniform rental 128.00 23799 Coast to Coast - Supplies for all Depte. 284.99 23800 Chemsearch - Naturalizer degreaser - Mtce. Bldg. 452.16 23801 General Rental Center - Dolly rental 5.30 23802 National Bushing - Air compressor - Mtce. Bldg. - 1,485.00 1,645.57 23803 Gordon Link - Gas 1,230.40 23804 Wright County Mayor's Assoc. - Mayor's dues 80.00 23805 Martle's Farm Service - Dog food 21.93 23800 Simonson Lumber - Misc. lumber 311.61 23807 Monticello Office Products - Misc. office supplies 317.03 23808 GENERAL FUND AMOUNT CHECK NO Brock White Co. - Blades for Fire Dept. 9.50 23809 Harry's Auto Supply - Air compressor - Fire Dept. - 1.485.00 1,851.32 23810 Ramier 6 Cries - Professional services - Raindance 20.00 23811 William Fair - Travel expense - LNC conference 50.00 23812 Sentry Systems - Fire station phone lease 54.00 23813 Wright County Treasurer - Police contract 10,645.21 23814 Local 849 - Union dues 115.00 23815 Pitney Bowes - Postage machine rental 72.00 23816 Norwest Bank Mpls. - 1973 G. 0. Imp. bond interest 575.60 23817 Doster - Valve - St. Dept. 44.84 23818 Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees 117.00 23819 Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees 228.00 23820 Dept. of Not. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees 36.00 23821 Monticello Times - Misc. publishing 6 adv. 436.59 23822 MN. Dep. Reg. Assoc. - Membership dues 140.00 23823 Seitz Hdwe. - Misc. supplies 168.04 23824 National Life Ins. - Ins. premium - Tom Eidem 100.00 23825 Monticello Printing - Printing 346.85 23826 Safety Kleen - Equip.mtce. 68.80 23827 First Trust Center - Paying agent fees - 84 G. 0. Bonds 927.50 23828 Global Equip. - Tools - drum lifter, drum lifting hook. Wrench 203.10 23829 Plumbery - Shop material 76.72 23830 Glass Hut - New windshield - 83 Chev, truck 169.80 23831 Maus Foods - Supplies 42.55 23832 Road Machinery 6 Supplies - Truck rental for Christ. lights 306.20 23833 Unocal 425 - Gas 12.65 23834 Smith. Pringle, Hayes - Legal 1.197.00 23835 Foster Franzen Agency - Ins. premium 5,235.00 23836 Ben Franklin - Film - J. Simoln 19.90 23837 ICMA Retirement - Payroll ded. 284.34 23838 Tom Eidem - Car allowance 300.00 23839 State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded. 123.04 23840 Northern States Power - Utilities 8,402.52 23841 Monticello Hockey Assoc. - Reimbursement for hockey rink exp. 1,833.53 23842 Mr. 6 Mrs. Ronald Zimmerman - Refund on variance application 25.00 23843 Monticello Fire Dept. - January wages 1.331.35 23844 David Stromberg - Animal control expense 287.50 23865 Jerry Hermes - Janitorial at library 216.67 23846 TTTC - Reg, fee for Roger Mack seminar 20.00 23847 Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees 12.00 23848 Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees 54.00 23849 Wright County State Bank - FWT 4,731.64 23850 State Treasurer - PERA W/H 1,356.61 23851 State Treasurer - Ins. premiums 27.00 23852 Banker's Life Ins. - Group ins. premium 4,008.72 23853 Ag Chem Equip. - Axle for sludge truck 11,801.42 23854 Bowman Barnes - Supplies - Mtce. bldg. 126.95 23855 Marco Business Products - Ribbons, paper, etc. 190.75 23856 Autocon Industries - Water Dept. repairs 101.23 23857 Water Products - Meters, etc. 297.89 23858 Rick Wolfeteller - Travel expense - GFOA mtg., etc. 65.50 23859 Humane Society of Wright Co. - Animal control expense 80.00 23860 Davis Electronic - Pager repairs - Fire Dept. 160.93 23861 Phillipe b6 - Gas 24.99 23862 Feedrlte Controls - Sample 10.00 23863 AT 6 T Systeme - Fire phone 3.96 23864 GENERAL FUND AMOUNT CHECK NO 011ie Koropchak - Travel expense 29.25 23865 Al 6 Julie Nelson - Sub. 13.72 23866 Mobil Oil Corp. - Gas 9.90 23867 Monticello TW Hardware - Supplies 9.27 23868 Team Laboratories - Sewer Dept. supplies 81.65 23869 Payroll for January 25,817.92 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS FOR FEBRUARY- 1987 ;146,218.81 C. L LIQUOR FUND ---- FEBRUARY - 1987 AMOUNT CHECK NO. Quality Wine 6 Spirits - Liquor 1,157.55 12887 Eagle Dist. Co. - Liquor 3.112.58 12888 Eagle Wine - Liquor 73.24 12889 Ed Phillips 6 Sons - Liquor 3.069.43 12890 Commissioner of Revenue - SWT - Jan. 220.00 12891 Wright County State Bank - FWT 6 FICA W/H 610.68 12892 State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded. 170.00 12893 State Treasurer - PERA W/H 185.00 12894 Quality Wine 6 Spirits - Liquor 75.95 12895 Twin City Wine - Liquor 1,172.68 12896 Eagle Dist. Co. - Liquor 5.151.50 12897 Griggs, Cooper 6 Co. - Liquor 159.25 12898 Eagle Wine Co. - Liquor 340.14 12899 Thorpe Dist. Co. - Beer 6,798.50 12900 Grosslein Bev. - Beer 10,545.09 12901 Dick Beverage - Beer 1,828.25 12902 Liefert Trucking - Freight 468.72 12903 Dahlheimer Diet. - Beer, etc. 9,028.45 12904 Cloudy Town Diet. - Misc, mdse. 49.00 12905 Stromquist Dist. - Misc. mdse. 24.75 12906 7 Up Bottling - Misc. mdse. 21.65 12907 Bernick's Pepsi Cola - Misc. mdse. 339.75 12908 Jude Candy 6 Tobacco - Misc. mdse. 445.85 12909 St. Cloud Refrigeration - Repairs to ice machine 38.50 12910 Coast to Coast - Store expense 37.15 12911 Service Sales Corp. - Store expense 38.95 12912 Monticello Office Products - Store supplies 48.04 12913 Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone 70.62 12914 Yonak Sanitation - Garbage service 133.50 12915 Northern States Power - Utilities 521.70 12916 North Central Public Service - Utilities 194.57 12917 City of Monticello - Sewer/water bill 171.89 12918 Day Diet. Co. - Misc. aides. 556.90 12919 Viking Coca Cola - Misc. aides. 296.75 12920 Maus Foods - Store supplies 18.80 12921 State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded. 170.00 12922 VOID -0- 12923 Old Dutch Foods - Misc. mdse. 142.89 12924 Eagle Dist. Co. - Wine purchase 20.04 12925 Eagle Wine Co. - Liquor 408.75 12926 Ed Phillipe 6 Sone - Liquor 4.355.47 12927 Wright County State Bank - FWT taxes 586.86 12928 State Treasurer - PERA W/H 181.07 12929 Quality Wine - Liquor 470.41 12930 Griggs, Cooper - Liquor 4,660.28 12931 Twin City Wine - Liquor 519.18 12932 Yellow Pages - Advertising 95.00 12933 Banker's Life - Group Ins. 321.94 12934 Eagle Wine - Wine purchase 88.09 12935 Payroll for January 3,655.43 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS - FEBRUARY $62,850.79 �' .• CITE Of 10TTICFL O . ItAnthly•OuildlAg Dzpertmmnt Report 1 MUU73 mid USES runLh of 19.0j jIla. '-' -9" Tom" -Less tear lisle leer 1 Ff30D:T5 ISSUED ttnth I712:•EamtR�ttnLh 3Am0APT Loot Tear to Soto To Date RE3ISFIRIAL . Number - Yalu Lion a f it t t f 1 f ii $522,100.00 roan _ 59,170:00 375.80 522, tOp.00 510,930.00 510,930.00 3,268.31 2,734.10 2.734.10 3,268.31 Surcharges ,29.20 261.04 255.45 255.45 261,04 00190.9ICIAL . Rumber 4 3 Valuation 33900.0 .00 44,430.00 40,000.00 40.000.00 44.430.00 Fobs t.esi.82' 417,80 238.00 238.00 •-417.00 Surcharges Surc 169.50• 22.20 ,, 20.00 20.00 - 22.20 lilws*UAL R mbar Valuation Foem , Surcharges P W118100 "umber 2 9 ♦ 4 9 roan 57.00 217.00 145.00 145.00 217.00 Surcbargvs 1.00 4.50 2.00 2.00 4.50 DTIIEIl9 Number . Valuation rase f Surcharges ' TOTAL 110. "WflTS 10 �` 23 ' 9 9 23 TOTAL YAL4ATIDm 397 430.00 566 530.00 I 5501930.00 550,030.00 586,530.00 �Q„t" rM 2.767 62 3.903.11 3,117.10 3,117.10 3.903.11 IOTA SUaCnAnr.Le 114. TO 297 277.45 277.45 287.74 OIRIIP71T IIIIRI I. Pt'1DIIT RAMS Number numi.T !.1R 51AR .rc Valuellon 71� a Icer incl rear Single rimtlly e 1 3,t37.11 f 253'.54 1'607,100.00 9 3 ' Dnplam 0 0 Hulti-family 0 t Commercial 0 0 Industrial 0 0 , Ree: Garage$ 0 0 ` 34018 0 0 P01LO 9uileinge 0 0; ALTIIUSEt R OR RITAIR . Dwellings 2 131.00 7.60 ; 15.000.00 2 1 Commercial 3 ,417.50 22.20 , 44,430.00 3 . '1 , IOdustlfil 0 0 FtUNCINO 1 All types 9 217.00 4.50 9 4 ' accg00oJi1 eTW CTIJMI 3.1sealmq Pools O 0 , 0. he .. 0 0 TEMPORAW PERMIT i 0 . 0 0L101.21770m } •'• 0 0 TIITAL9 TS • 3,903.11 247.74 066.570.0 23 .a-. "TALI 4566.510.00 ynm $mow 67-1010 ROW« 4 Garage or SLR Dnmlop ent C8./2640 Rod Oak is. 271.11 101411. MAN AM BR $271./1 rem g1VBMIR :4.106." �.J sae ` INDIVIDUAL PUM17 ACTIVITY REPORT PERMIT SURCHARGE MONTH OF Jia"' SSURCHARtl 'ERmIT ( DESCRIPTION P� NAMEhCCAT ION VALUATION 7UMBER 5.00 67-+006 8teewsnt Mead«2 Jose Maxwell/149 Riverview, Or., 45 1 5,000.00 :7-1007 Roue« Renwatisn Ruse Olson/311 West 3rd et. A 10.000.00 67-100: lALiri«r Reagent "ad imuar/200 Wet 7th Rt. 1.410.00 67-1005 SRtorior Raeodml AC Jelin Plolated/1218 Hi:hv*y 25 :. 1.000.00 67-1010 $on" a Garage ar BLD Do,slepeent Cs./2840 Red Oak to. 45.400.00 s7-1011 lAt.rlw Roeadal Ac Joheoon Dept. stere/121 W. Broadway 40.000.00 N-1012 HOOaa a Oarap sr 8+189 sLaaer/1226 W. River St. 67,100.00 67 -/Ota Rens« i Oarale 8rxahenren guilders Ce./2841 Red Oak Ln. $4.400.00 .SO Homes67.1014 Hw« a Garage orMarvin emerge "are/$ ralrvoy 0r. 38,500.00 •7.1015 Haw" a Gorage IF Marvin **we* 610mrs/10 Tatrsay Or. $4,700.00 :7-1016 go" a Garage 8P Marv1n George 8lders/12 reirvay 0w,. 61.400.00 67-1011 Dause a Garage at Marvin Sea"* slaore/ti Samatrap CLr6Le 51.400.00 67-1018 Souma A Garage sr Marvin Go" si/gra/I1 roirvey Dr. $1,000.00 67-101• Hawn a Garage Y Brad Pylo/2616 Meadow Oak Ln. 71.000.00 "TALI 4566.510.00 ynm $mow 67-1010 ROW« 4 Garage or SLR Dnmlop ent C8./2640 Rod Oak is. 271.11 101411. MAN AM BR $271./1 rem g1VBMIR :4.106." �.J sae ` PERMIT SURCHARGE PLUHBINO SSURCHARtl $ 50.SO 6 2.50 80.50 5.00 • ti.EO .70 64.00 L. SO 417.10 122.70 .621.00 5 .50 248.50 20.00 114.50 21.64' .12.00 .50 114.10 27.20 21.00 .50 102.$0 26.25' 21.00 .50 204.10 25.25 21.00 .SO 117.20 25.70 23.00 .50 " 267.20 25.70 21.00 .50 2".00 25.50 21.00 .SO 346.00 25.50 24.00 .50 $1.416.00 $393.24 #217.00 7..SO