City Council Agenda Packet 05-26-1987( AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
l Tuesday, May 26, 1987 - 7:30 p.m.
Mayor: Arve A. Grimsmo
Council Members: Fran Fair, Bill Fair, Warren Smith, Dan Blonigen
I. Call to Order.
2. Approval of Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held May 11, 1987,
and the Board of Review Meeting Held May 18, 1987.
3. Citizens Comments/Petitions, Requests and Complaints.
Old Business
6. Consideration of Granting Approval to a Final Plat for Meadow
Oak Fourth Addition.
5. Consideration of Change Order No. 1 to Construction 5 Improvement
Project.
6. Consideration of Authorizing OSM to Prepare Plans for the Realignment
of Otter Crack Road and for the Expansion of the Municipal Liquor
Store Parking Lot.
New Business
7. Liquor Store Report - lot Quarter.
B. Consideration of Granting a Conditional Use for Minor Auto Repair
in a B-4 Zone. Applicant, Jim Eisele.
9. Consideration of Traffic Study on West County Road 39 from Elm
Street to 1-94.
10. Consideration of Bills for the Month of May.
11. Adjourn.
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, May 11, 1987 - 7:30 p.m.
Members Present: Fran Fair, Bill Fair, warren Smith, Dan Blonigen
Members Absent: Arve Grimsmo
2. Approval of Minutes.
Motion was made by Bill Fair, seconded by Blonigen, and unanimously
carried to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held April 27,
1987.
4. Consideration of a Request for a Partial Subdivision of a Residential
Outlot, Outlot H1 Meadow Oak Addition, to be Known as the Meadow
Oak Fourth Addition. Applicant, Dickman Knutson.
Mr. Dickman Knutson was present to request approval of his final
plat consisting of a partial platting of Outlot H known as Meadow
Oak Fourth Addition. Mr. Knutson noted that the preliminary plat
for Outlot H shows a total of 29 lots but that he currently has financing
for the utility construction and street improvements for only 14
of the proposed lots; and this is why he is now requesting a partial
platting only.
Administrator Eidem noted that the original Meadow Oak Development
was approved as a Planned Unit Development primarily for manufactured
housing; and as a result, many of the lots are smaller in design
than currently allowed by city ordinances. Mr. Eidem recommended
that since the majority of the housing now being built within the
Meadow Oak Subdivision is conventional construction, the Council
may want to consider reviewing the Planned Unit Development status
for the balance of the development to see if it should continue being
allowed smaller lots than other developers and subdivisions. Mr. Eidem
also noted that it was the recommendation of the City staff that
since the preliminary plat proposal for Outlet H called for the platting
of 29 lots, the entire Fourth Addition should be platted at one time
rather than platting only 14 lots with the remainder still being
ai, outlot. Mr. Knutson felt that by only platting half of the outlot
at the present time, the development would be proceeding in an orderly
fashion; and the partial platting is based primarily on financial
commitments for utility constructions only on 14 lots.
Councilmembar Bill Fair questioned whether all utility plans, especially
the storm sewer plan, have been submitted and approved by the City
Engineer. Public works Director, John Simola, noted that questions
have arisen regarding the storm sower and drainage plan for the development
and noted that storm sewer drainage plane for a partial platting
such as proposed has not been intended to be constructed by the developer
since the storm sower would cover a larger ares than currently being
planned. Mr. Simola felt the City should be looking at the drainage
-1-
Council Minutes - 5/11/87
plan and storm sewer needs over the entire remaining development
to determine which portions of the storm sewer should be constructed
' now even if it results in improvements to other outlots not yet planned
to provide proper drainage. In addition, it was noted that Mr. Knutson,
under the present proposal, is altering the drainage flow from that
originally proposed; and the result may be more drainage into Ditch 33
rather than the holding pond that currently exists at the north end
of the plat. This alteration of the drainage plan should again be
rovi ewed by the City Engineer to determine the effects.
Developer Knutson stated it was his opinion that it is the City's
responsibility to provide all drainage easements into Ditch 33 for
the entire development. Administrator Eidem noted that the original
plan called for approximately the north half of the development to
drain into a pond which the City felt would be sufficient to hold
all storm water. As far as the southern half of the development
in the future, it is the staff's opinion that the developer still
is responsible for obtaining any easements or permits to drain the
development into Ditch 33.
After further discussion on the proposed plat and drainage requirements,
motion was made by Bill Fair, seconded by Warren Smith, and unanimously
carr led to table a decision on the proposed plat for two weeks to
enable the City Engineer to review the entire drainage plan for the
balance of the development and to enable the engineer to recommend
what portions, if any, of the storm sewer utilities should be constructed
as part of any future platting of outlots. After receiving the engineer's
recommendations, the replotting of Outlot M into only 14 iota at
the present time, with the balance being phased, would be considered
for approval.
Relating to the storm sever issue, Public Works Director, John Simola,
requested what steps should be taken to eliminate a drainage problem
in the Meadow Oak Estates Subdivision, as a catch basin should be
cane tructed in a portion of Outlot 0 that would drain existing home
siteaa in the Estates plat. The estimated costa of the catch basin
and pipe is $750 to $1,000 which Mr. Knutson, along with the Public
Worksl Director and City Administrator, will discuss as to financing
methods.
5. Conaldsration of a Resolution Authoririnq the Sale of Bonds for Tax
Increment District M7.
As pout of the Tax Increment Finance Plan relating to the WAWCO Minnesota
Window Company, the City will be required to issue bonds for $155,000
to f lnanca the purchase of lots in the industrial park for resale
to the Window Company at a reduced price. The bond Jesus will be
ropa ld from tax increments generated by the new project over an eight
year period.
The City's Bonding Consultant, Jerry Shannon of Springsted, Inc..
will be seeking quotes on the placement of this bond issue and return
to the Council June 8, 1987.
-Z-
D
Council Agenda - 5/11/87
Motion was made by Bill Fair, seconded by Blonigen, and unanimously
carried to adopt a resolution authorizing the solicitation of bids
for the sale of General Obligation Taxable Tax Increment Bonds.
See Resolution 87-16.
6. Consideration of a Resolution from MN/DOT Approving Plans and Specifications
for Highway 25 Improvements from River Street to Bridge.
The Minnesota Department of Transportation has requested from the
City approval of plans and specifications relating to the bridge
project being proposed for construction soon. Since the project
includes some improvements within the city limits, City approval
of the plans and specifications is required.
Public works Director, John Simola, noted some areae of concerns
that the City Council should address prior to approval of the plans
and specifications. The first area related to the proposed landscaping
along the slope areae near the bridge. Initially, MN/DOT planned
to only landscape the area with low lying Sumac planted every four
feet; and the City was under the understanding that more landscaping
would be provided to enable the area to blend into the park. MN/DOT
representatives present indicated they would be willing to work with
the City and have their landscape architect come up with a more innovative
design and planting scheme and sufficient funds would be placed in
the project for this purpose.
Mr. Simola noted that the plans made no mention of fencing the right-of-way
to provide separation between the construction project and the current
park area; and again State representatives indicated they will fence
the entire right-of-way when the project begins but presently have
no plana to fence in the entire park area along the river after the
project is completed. Mr. Simola also noted that during the testing
procedures recently completed by Twin City Testing Company, damage
was done to the park areae not under casement to MN/DOT and requested
that an assurance be gotten from either Twin City Testing, the contractor,
or MN/DOT that this area would be restored. After discussion with
MN/DOT representatives, it wan the consensus not to require restoration
of the damage in the park at the present time, but the City would
be able to negotiate with the contractor on the bridge project for
restoration of the entire park area after the project is completed
and to allow the City staff to negotiate with the contractor for
use of the entire, park during the construction period.
It was also noted by the City Engineer that the proposed storm sewer
outlet to the river does not appear to be adequately supported if
the City is required to maintain the device in the future. Normally,
the City installs those outlets on steal sheet piling and ties the
structure back into several of the adjoining pipes, and all riprap
at the outlet is grouted to prevent washing away of the material.
MN/DOT representatives indicated they will be grouting the riprap
but did not feel that steel sheet piling is necessary and would guarantee
that they would be responsible should problems &rise in the future.
-3-
n
Council Minutes - 5/11/87
One last item noted by the Public Works Director was that substantial
dewatering will be taking place during construction of the pilings
for the bridge and that this area is near the city wells; and should
problems arise with the city water supply, the City's need for water
would take precedent over the dewatering of the river for construction.
After further review, motion was made by Bill Fair, seconded by Blonigen,
and unanimously carried to adopt a resolution approving the plane
and specifications for the improvements to Highway 25. See Resolution 87-15.
7. Consideration of a Resolution Entering into a Cooperative Agreement
with MN/DOT Regarding City Participation in Sidewalk Cost - Bridge
Improvement.
As part of the bridge replacement project, MN/DOT has requested a
cooperative construction agreement between the City and M74/DOT which
would require the City to pay for portions of the storm sever work,
manhole castings, and sidewalk leading to the bridge from River Street
and for the new sidewalk under the bridge. The estimated cost for
the City of Monticello would be approximately $7,975 based on the
percentages of as percent for the storm never improvements and 10 percent
for the sidewalk. The cooperative agreement also would require the
City to maintain all improvements after construction.
Motion was made by Bill Fair, seconded by Dan Blonigen, and unanimously
carried to approve entering into a cooperative construction agreement
with MN/DOT for the above items contingent upon City Attorney review
and approval. Soo Resolution 87-16.
B. Consideration of Authorizing the Public Works Director and Finance
Director to Visit DMDI Headquarters.
As part of the acquisition of a computer system for the City. DMDI
representatives have requested that the Public Works Director and
Finance Director visit their facilities in Reston, Virginia, to view
software that is available for the Public Works Department and finance
packages.
Motion was made by Blonigen, seconded by Fair, and unanimously carried
to authorize the Public works Director and Finance Director to visit
the computer software vandor's headquarters for the purpose of viewing
software systems that are available.
9. Consideration of Sealing Leaks in Sanitary Sewer on Linn Street Between
River and Front Streets.
Public Works Director, John Simola, noted that a recent inspection
of the sever pipe from River Street to Front Street on Linn contained
several leaks and some cracked and quartered pipe. A quote was received
from visu-Sower Clean 6 Seal, Inc., of Minneapolis for approximately
91,700 to repair this section of sewer pipe.
-4-
Council Agenda - 5/11/87
CNotion was made by Bill Fair, seconded by Blonigen, and unanimously
carried to authorize the sealing of the sewer pipe at an estimated
cost of $1,700.
10. Discussion on Water ing/Scrinkiinq Ban.
Public Works Director, John Simola, noted that due to the recent
dry conditions, the City has been pumping over a million gallons
per day of water and recommended that a volunteer watering ban be
established immediately. The watering ban would allow watering by
residences on every other day based on house numbers. By consensus,
the Public Works Director was authorized to publish a notice to this
effect.
11. Update on Softball Field Construction.
The Public Works Director noted that the now softball field complex
near the NSP training facility is currently ready for seeding; but
because of the dry weather conditions. it has been recommended that
the seeding not take place until cooler weather in the fall.
Motion was made by Blonigen, seconded by Fair, and unanimously carried
to authorize the Public Works Director to wait until approximately
August 1 before proceeding with the seeding of the ballfields.
Rick wolfatejler
Assistant Administrator
MINUTES
MONTICELLO BOARD OF REVIEW
May 18, 1987 - 7:00 p.m.
Board Members Present: Dan Blonigen, Bill Fair, Warren Smith, Fran Fair
Board Members Absent: Arve Grimsmo
Staff Present: Gary Anderson, Thomas Eidem, Rick Wolfeteller
County Staff Present: Doug Gruber, Wright County Assessor
The 1987 Board of Review was called to order by Acting Mayor, Fran Fair,
at 7:02 p.m.
1. James Eisele
713 West Fourth Street
Monticello, MN 55362
Parcel 0155-010-026030
Total EMV 1986: $51,600
Total EMV 1987: $61,900
Motion by Bill Fair, seconded by Warren Smith, to leave the total
Estimated Market Value for 1987 at $61,900. Motion carried with Dan
Blonigen opposed and Arvo Grimsmo absent.
2. James Eisele
706, 712, 718, and 720 West Fourth Street
Monticello, MN 55362
Parcel 0155-010-023070
0155-010-023080
0155-010-023090
Total EMV 1986: $15,000
Total EMV 1987: 530,000
Total EMV 1987: 520,000 (adjusted)
Motion by Bill Fair, seconded by Dan Blonigen, to reduce the
total market value applied on these throe parcel numbers from
$30,000 total to $20,000 total. The motion carried unanimously
with Arve Grimsmo absent.
3. Roman Svoboda
325 West Fourth Street
Monticello, MN 55362
Parcel 0155-010-030021
Total EMV 1986: $47,300
Total EMV 1987: 553,600
Total EMV 1987: $52,000 (adjusted)
Board of Review Minutes - 5/18/87
Motion by Bill Fair, seconded by warren Smith, to reduce the
total estimated market value from $53,600 to $52,000. Motion
carried unanimously with Arve Grimsmo absent.
4. Larry Kanthak
209 Kevin Longley Drive
Monticello, MN 55362
Parcel #155-048-001060
Total EMV 1986: 5 700
Total EMV 1987: S88,700
Motion by Bill Fair, seconded by Dan Blonigen, to approve the
total estimated market value of 588,700 on this parcel. Motion
carried unanimously with Arve Grimsmo absent.
5. Walnut Plaza
309 South Walnut Street
Monticello, MN 55362
Parcel 1155-010-031060
Total EMV 1986: $128,900
Total EMV 1987: $168,600
Total EMV 1987: $153,000 (adjusted)
Motion by 8111 Fair, seconded by Dan Blonigen, to approve a reduction
in the estimated market value from $168,600 to 5153,000. Motion
carried unanimously with Arve Grimsmo absent.
6. Harry Bebo
224 Wont Third Street
Monticello, MN 55362
Parcel #155-010-031010
Total EMV 1986: 5305,900
Total EMV 1987: 5338,800
Total EMV 1987: 5310,500 (adjusted)
Motion by 8111 Fair, seconded by Warren Smith, to approve the
reduction in total estimated market value from S338,800 to $310,500.
Motion carried unanimously with Arve Grimsmo absent.
7. Janolla Iano
412 East Fourth Street
Monticello, MN 55362
Parcel 0155-015-036060
Total EMV 1986: 541,300
Total EMV 1987: 369,000
Total EMV 1987: 566,100 (adjusted)
Motion by 8111 Fair, seconded by Dan Blonigen, to reduce the
total estimated market value from 569,000 to 666,100. Motion
carried unanimously with Arve Grimsmo absent.
Board of Review Minutes - 5/18/87
/ 8. Russell Lovegren
` 1205 West Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362
Parcel #155-012-002080
Total ENV 1986: 583,500
Total EMV 1987: $83,500
Total EMV 1987: $81,900 (adjusted)
Motion by Warren Smith, seconded by Fran Fair, to reduce the
total estimated market value from $83,500 to $81,900. Motion
carried with Bill Fair opposing and Arve Grimsmo absent.
9. Moon Motors
414 South Pine Street
Monticello, MN 55362
Parcel #155-010-016010
Total ENV 1986: $124.500
Total EMV 1987: $172,600
Total ENV 1987: $124,500 (adjusted)
There was no motion presented on this, as County Assessor Doug
Gruber indicated it was a clerical error on the County's part
and extended the numbers down for the 1987 assessment. The total
1987 Estimated Market Value will be $124,500.
10. Gary De Boer
220 Marvin Elwood Road
Monticello, MN 55362
Parcel 1155-035-001131
Total EMV 1986: $42,500
Total EMV 1987: $42,500
Motion by Dan Blonigen, seconded by Bill Fair, to leave the total
estimated market value as listed for 1987 at $42,500. Motion
carried with Warren Smith opposing and Arve Grimsmo absent.
11. Gary DeBoer
1009 Golf Course Road
Monticello, MN 55362
Parcel 0155-500-101203
Total EMV 1986: 557,600
Total EMV 1987: $57,600
Total EMV 1987: $49,200 (adjusted)
Motion by Dan Blonigen, seconded by Warren Smith, to reduce the
total estimated market value from $57,600 to $49,200. Motion
carried unanimously with Arve Grimsmo absent.
-3-
n
Board of Review Minutes - 5118187
12. Carol Pitt
225 East Fourth Street
Monticello, MN 55362
Parcel 1155-010-071050
Total ENV 1986: $29,600
Total ENV 1987: $48,000
Total ENV 1987: $45,000 (adjusted)
Motion by Bill Fair, seconded by Dan Blonigen, to reduce the
total estimated market value from 548,000 to $45,000. Motion
carried unanimously with Arve Grimsmo absent.
13. Al Larson
213 Nest Fourth Street
Monticello, MN 55362
Parcel #155-010-031031
Total EMV 1986: $186,100
Total EMV 1987: $185,900
Motion by Bill Fair, seconded by warren Smith, not to change
the total estimated market value for 1987 of $185,900. Motion
carried unanimously with Arve Grimsmo absent.
14. Dave Peterson's Monticello Ford
100 west Oakwood Drive
Monticello, MN 55362
Parcel 1155-500-113413
Total EMV 1966: $271,400
Total EMV 1987: $624,100
Total EMV 1987: $573,300
Motion by Fran Pair, seconded by Bill Pair, to reduce the 1987
total estimated market value from 5624,100 to $573,300. Motion
carried unanimously with Arve Crimemo absent.
15. Dan Blonigon
405 Vine Street
Monticello, MN 55362
Parcel 1155-010-023060
Total CMV 1986: $50,800
Total EMV 1987: $54,700
Motion by Bill Fair, seconded by warren Smith, to have the City
Assessor, Gary Anderson, and the County Assessor, Doug Gruber,
review the property with Mr. Dan Blonigon; and whatever they
come up with for a total estimated market value will be agreeable
with the City Council members. Motion carried unanimously with
Arvs Crimsmo absent.
Board of Review Minutes - 5/18/87
Motion by Dan elonigen, seconded by Bill Fair, to adjourn the meeting.
The meeting adjourned at 9:49 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
4�y A4'491
Gary Anderson
City Assessor
Council Agenda - 5/26/87
d. Consideration of Granting Approval to a Final Plat for Meadow Oak
Fourth Addition. (J.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The City staff has met with Mr. Dickman Knutson on two occasions
since the last Council meeting. The purpose of our meetings was
to work out an equitable solution to the Fourth Addition staging
question and to determine whether the Fourth Addition would continue
as a PUD. Through our first meeting it was determined that Mr. Knutson
had no objection to platting the entire Outlot H. In addition, he
felt comfortable in returning to the original grading and drainage
plan for the PUD directing again all water to the northerly pond
with the exception of area A-3 to the southeast. We made verbal
agreements which would take care of all of the loose ends on the
previous portions of Meadow Oak and were able to take a fresh look
then at the Fourth Addition.
On Friday we met with John Badalich to discuss the proposed utility
construction. We then followed up with a second meeting with Mr.
Knutson on Tuesday afternoon. After much discussion, we reached
an agreement which the City staff felt comfortable with and would
allow Mr. Knutson to continue with hie project in conformance with
his proposed budget and scheduling. The following is the proposed
plan.
1. Mr. Knutson Is to return to the original grading plan sending
much of the surface water north as was originally proposed.
In addition, he is to draft a letter to the Wright County Board
requesting discharge of the surface water from area A-3 into
a nearby marshy area which eventually leads to Ditch 33. it
is hoped that this letter will result in an allowable discharge
so that the area of A-3 can be developed or that it will load
to a Ditch 33 study that the County has discussed but tabled
for many, many months.
2. Mr. Knutson will plat the entire Outlot H as the Fourth Addition
with Blocks 1-4, and he will provide the City with all the necessary
plans, drawings, specifications, and documentation as originally
required in the PUD.
3. The staging of construction within the Fourth Addition will be
as follows.
Stage 1
A. Street Construction
The entire road bed for Meadow Lane will be graded to the
west boundary of the plat. The area to the east of the intersection
of Red Oak Lane will be paved with curb and gutter. The
intersection of Red Oak Lane and the area to Cho west will
ME
Council Agenda - 5/26/87
be left in subgrade condition somewhat below final grade
but elevated above the surrounding low area so that no water
will stand on the platted street right-of-way. Temporary
blacktop spillways will be built from the end of the curb
and gutter on both the north and south sides of Meadow Lane
to direct the water to temporarily pond on Lot 1, Block 4,
and Lot 8, Block 1.
B. Storm Sever
No storm sever will be completed with the first phase other
than the temporary ponding as mentioned under the street
construction portion.
C. Sanitary Sever
The sanitary sever will be completed along Meadow Oak Lane
to the intersection of Red Oak Lane. Construction will include
the manhole for access at the intersection of Rod Oak Lane
and Meadow Lane. All services east of Red Oak Lane will
be installed.
D. water
The water system shall be completed along Meadow Lane until
it can be terminated west of the and of the paved street
at a location acceptable to the City Engineer.
Stage 1I
Stage II will consist of the remainder of construction within
the Fourth Addition. It will include all of the grading, streets,
water, sower, pathways, and storm sower system draining the Fourth
Addition. Much of the storm savor work is located in Outlot I
but will be conatructod with the remaining portion of the Fourth
Addition and will comply with the original grading and drainage
plan. All the necessary documentation, plane and specifications
as required in the original PUD will again be provided with the
construction of the remaining lots in the Fourth Addition.
Stage II construction in the Fourth Addition is expected to start
when the inventory of buildable Iota reaches lase than ten.
Mr. Knutson expects this to occur in late 1987 or early 1988.
4. It is understood that no other outlots currently under Mr. Knutson's
control may be platted by him prior to completion of the Fourth
Addition in its entirety and the storm sewer system serving it
as outlined above.
-2-
Council Agenda - 5/26/87
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
i. The first alternative would be to approve the replat of Outlot H
with the conditions and development path as outlined in
points one through four.
2. The second alternative would be to require Mr. Knutson to complete
all of the Fourth Addition at once along with the necessary storm
sewer. It is the staff's opinion that this is not financially
feasible for Mr. Knutson and may result in a stoppage, at least
temporarily, of the development of Meadow Oak. This is not in
the beat interest of the developer, as he stands to lose due
to continuing interest payments, and the City would have to wait
substantially longer to recover those assessments already in
arrears on Outlot H.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the staff recommendation that the City Council approve the
final plat for Outlot H into the Fourth Addition of Meadow Oak as
outlined in Alternative number one and that the conditions there
outlined be formally recorded in the minutes and be a permanent part
of the approval. This alternative allows the developer to continue
and allows the project to continue at least temporarily as a PUD.
It addressee the staff -a concerns and brings the Fourth Addition
into compliance with the PUD in all areas except in the area of manufactured
homes versus custom built homes. It places additional burdens on
the developer to work with his neighbor and the County for future
planning of the PUD and provides a workable solution.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the Meadow Oak Fourth Addition replat of Outlot H; Copy of
the proposed storm cowor drainage oyatcm for the Fourth Addition;
Copy of the Ultra Homes, Inc., ealos summary.
-3-
" _ � �`, (/ ' J .M10 o•d0O .MAO
'a d •.+ 4•' l.- im mw m•.w.n
ay �'• ,, •4 M1s m•v m. ,..,
0.0
3 y Pia /• :.
2 �• F %6 .s.. i.
1 !
n.•w•w•� _ �, .i , .y t?11 .ti
f- l �n.i ^ 1• , I a 4
1 1 91
i 1,'W'w Op. , ' ,,,.•79'x' y:l• ,1 1
.rr�.g, ►, 111.' w.IS-! ,• :.:;; ,t ; ,I 114.: it 16. a
-iu.M_-+ i �' � 1 PO.I�!•-'_ _-, �.'Y:li 1; •'a 11,• �" .RI 1,¢ +, 11{ I�.;. 4,
il J ,t 1 r �Oi.M 1 ` 1 ,- , Ill ' .. tl ly 1pr1 14 0 -y, 1 , !
H 10, ,nw•_-ter. =��Is c al /k,,1ta.9':al, - ,1`�•'�lr !
• i�1 yid Q ,' O � '�` II' �I �_-. ,�..,., �' ., i a �:
I 1; � .I,'.
.-
Q�V'P! 1 1 f li
_ A �m� ..; :SA p h� ��l'•r Ii ,' '�9i 11 a1 i6 5
GO
1 n�., 6o'' 2
PTO*kOi i
..... .. .....
....•___."._i__......_ .-a..
ULTRA HOMES, INC
M.'Y'r 7
111S 1117 (1$58) ((q$I)
-,hictiow Oak IZ .3 —.6 5 IQ
_
*Wfti -Oak.
oil
,Meade w Usk 61
-Ask- 0
lit it; 4 W, S -1 0 7)
I t I I
•
$.I- -�..int) )SIfir
I . Mr. Knutson is to return to the original grading plan sending
much of the surface water north as was originally proposed.
In addition, he is to draft a letter to the Wright County Board
requesting discharge of the surface water from area A-3 into
a nearby marshy area which eventually leads to Ditch 33. It
is hoped that this letter will result in an allowable discharge
so that the area of A-3 can be developed or that it will lead
to a Ditch 33 study that the County has discussed but tabled
for many, many months.
2. Mr. Knutson will plat the entire Outlot H as the Fourth Addition
with Blocks 1-4, and he will provide the City with all the necessary
plans, drawings, specifications, and documentation as originally
required in the PUD.
3. The staging of conat:uction within the Fourth Addition will be
as follows.
Stage I
A. Street Construction
The entire road bed for Meadow Lane will be graded to the
vest boundary of the plat. The area to the east of the intersection
of Red Oak Lane will be paved with curb and gutter. The
intersection of Red Oak Lane and the area to the west will
be left in sub -grade condition somewhat below final grade
but elevated above the surrounding low area so that no water
will stand on the platted street right-of-way. Temporary
blacktop spillways will be built from the and of the curb
and gutter on both the north and south sides of Meadow Lane
to direct the water to temporarily pond on Lot 1, Block 6,
and Lot B, Block I.
B. Storm Sewer
No storm sewer will be completed with the first phase other
than the temporary ponding as mentioned under the street
construction portion.
C. Sanitary Sewer
The sanitary sewer will be completed along Meadow Oak Lana
to the intersection of Red Oak Lane. Construction will include
the manhole for access at the intersection of Red Oak Lane
and Meadow Lana. All services east of Red Oak Lane will
be installed.
D. Water
The water system shall be completed along Meadow Lane until
it can be terminated vest of the and of the paved street
at a location acceptable to the City Engineer.
Stage II
Stage II will consist of the remainder of construction within
the Fourth Addition. It will include all of the grading, streets,
water, sever, pathways, and storm sever system draining the Fourth
Addition. Much of the storm sever work is located in Outlot I
but will be constructed with the remaining portion of the Fourth
Addition and will comply with the original grading and drainage
plan. All the necessary documentation, plane and specifications
as required in the original PUD will again be provided with the
construction of the remaining lots in the Fourth Addition.
Stage II construction in the Fourth Addition is expected to start
when the inventory of buildable lots reaches less than ten.
Mr. Knutson expects this to occur in late 1987 or early 1988.
d. It is understood that no other outlets currently under Mr. Knutson's
control may be platted by him prior to completion of the Fourth
Addition in its entirety and the storm sever system serving it
as outlined above.
CITY OF MOMCELLO
9n..Iimols
Public Works Director
Dickman Knutson
9
Council Agenda - 5/26/87
5. Consideration of Change Order No. 1 to Construction 5 Improvement
Project. (J.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
During construction of the storm sewer along Washington Street, further
field investigation revealed problems with the proposed inlets to
an existing storm sewer manhole at the intersection of Washington
Street and Lauring Lane. The existing manhole is of a "T" type design
and does not yield itself readily to the incorporation of additional
ports for storm sewer use.
The City Engineer has determined that an additional manhole is needed
approximately eight feet in diameter located approximately 30 feet
south of the existing manhole. The original proposed inlets to the
existing manhole could be easily relocated to the new manhole without
additional cost. There is, however, additional coat in the manhole
itself. The City Engineer has negotiated a price of $3,600 for the
addition of thin storm sewer manhole.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to approve Change Order No. 1
in the amount of $3,600 and add the proposed additional manhole.
C2. The second alternative would be to continue with the project
and construct the manhole inlets as originally planned. As indicated
earlier, this does not appear to be practical, as that type of
construction does not lend itself well to the addition of the
inlets.
[1
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that you approve
Change Order No. 1 as outlined in alternative number one for $3,600.
There are ample contingency funds in the project to cover this change
order at this time.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the change order and drawing.
-4-
ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC.
2021 E. HENNEPIN AVE. - SUITE 238
MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55413
CHANGE ORDER NO. ...NO.. .1 ...
Construction 5/
s. 3,600.A0......... RE: WAril(19-44(10...
City Project No. 86-7
.S.A.L.EAMAtiog...IPC .................... Contractor
Ap. SO40. Hwy.. 10 ...........................
.St.. Cloud..W. 56301 .........................
Dear Sir (a)
Under your contra" dated .401—V ...................................... Is. 87. witb
the.Ci.ty. of.Bonticello.. Minnesota ........................ On -net for .............
. Construction .5/..Laur.i.ng.LAne..rity.P,r.piect..No..aO-:7 .............................
we are authorized by the owner to hereby direct you .to . construct. an.8.*:-.Q ................
diameter manhole at the location shown on the attached drawing
..... I .................................... I .................................................
. and. relocated. the. prciposO ........................................
.............................................................................. I .............
.............................. I ..... I .......................................................
........................................... ................................................
suad to add to (40ftqVft" the contract. In accordance with contract and gpecifteadosi, the am of
Three, Thousand. $1.);. Hundred. 7..-..- AM/ Dolla.
"sets win be an exten-lon of .. zero......, days for comisletka.
Tile date of comipliation of contract was -.8/31 is . 87 and now ww be is .87
A~* of 91101881 COMIMI TealAdditions total Dooluctletts coal'act to Date
$280.436.60 I $3,600.00 I zero $284,036.60
Approved .......................... 10.... Rexpwtfully Submitted.
................. ............ Deno..............
OWS
04ELEN-MAYEtON
Appoved.......................... 19 ....
........................................... . ....
com'sclo, - rDNC
Piro
EDGE Of EXISTINO-7
BITUMINOUS
C K.aNC, E a►c0E✓t N40.1
'P�ew+oJe. G&' 1=L.A"0 ENO St[TI
A►JTj Cc�N"ST`0.�.aC.T Qje�0u j:11K1.
F'►'iv4n1 tivLE . L.�sG.NIT�:- VY1.K.
G'toCStt� OF C.utt{jr �
RECONSTRUCT EXISTING STM. M.H. PROM
El. 936.0 TO MATCH PAVEMENT AS LUMP
SUM BID ITEM IIA.
LIMITS OF BITUMINOUS REMOVAL
LIGHT POLE (MOVE BY OTHERSI-
�G
$IB C 6 0 of STA.O-IS LT SIDE V PJ
-ITUMINOUS SHOULDEP.CX20'
ANNEL-WATER TO CATCH BAS
NG AT P.C. STA. 0 1 /
EXISTING SITUM US
00 yo
J e 2a QHS.
a
5 b PROVIDE OPENING IN M.H. 1
POR FUTURE 30" PIPE 8
BULKHEAD AT MANHO,LE.
i
11 1
Y t -'
1 1
OUTLOT A
t
t
\ CUDOTt
G •60°063
R • 367,82*
L • 386.09
Drglp f1I4
Cm.Ir. 11M.
•dr.r hr
t
�_
ORR 6CNELETi • MAYEROPV
'5541.00
C��-
�r�+
4ABWOCIAT:CB.ING
Mtr rur ywtr�. wr • wrrr ra
t . y t
L„��{M1/t� i/"�f�i/L.����^ti'r
/,���..�
I ghost M0.
0 rmuwr n, rmn/lu wu • YU1 m MM
/^\
,r� I
S & L EXCAVATING, INC.
800 South Hwy. 10
ST. CLOUD. MPt 66301
(612) 251.9230
TO O.S./K . ATT.✓s CHARLES J.EPArI;
ee�o21 r��f(146 w AVE Zaire 23p
II We hereby agree to make the Change (a) specified below:
9G �r
/K,4. G+M ?L, ETF-
-ly—�—/,� F
CHANGE ORDER
Number
LAw,AWC LAi✓/s /C,.,s TA&e-7* ✓-r_
�jZoA/TieE�IG .IrV`�
laielw°
.-CT -0 I G.rf O/ UUiwtl CW+iYCT 1
R -E C_E-I V D
Ct.' n,,HLLLN•fAAI......: ASSOC.
CC%k.u. no
td AY -J-4-4987
f—ru
NOTE: This Change Order becomes pan of and In conformance with the existing contract.
WE AGREE hereby to make the Change (a) specified above at this price 0 $ 3Lea,l
one
PREVIOUS CONTRACT AMOUNT s
I .nwi
l •� •tl rte° , REVISED CONTRACT TOTAL $
' -CEPTED — The above prices and opociflcatlons of
Change Order are satisfactory and are hereby ac• Date of acceptancr�
tooted. All work to be performed under same forms and
conditions as specified in original Contract unless other- Signature
wino stipulated. 1OWY6°'
r
S
Council Agenda - 5/26/87
6. Consideration of Authorizing OSM to Prepare Plane for the Realignment
of Otter Creek Road and for the Expansion of the Municipal Liquor
Store Parking Lot. O .S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Otter Creek Road
At a previous meeting, the City Council discussed the realignment
of Otter Creek Road with Mr. Tom Holthaus, developer of Charlie's
West property. At that time, Mr. Holthaus agreed to pay for one-half
of the cost of realigning Otter Creek Road and 100 percent of the
cost for the right turn lane leading to his store from County Road 75.
Chuck Lepak from Orr-Schelen-Mayeron has done an estimate, including
realignment of Otter Creek, Mr. Holthaus's right turn lane, and extending
the right turn lane from Mr. Holthaus's driveway to Otter Creek Road.
A copy is enclosed for your review.
Based upon the estimate, we expect the total project cost to be in
the area of $18,300. we expect the City's share to be somewhere
around $8,650, and Mr. Holthaus's share around 59,650 depending upon
actual bids and final quantity. To proceed with the project, we
request that the City Council authorize preparation of plane and
specifications and advertisement for bids to be reviewed at a later
meeting.
Municipal Liquor Store Parkinq Lot
The City has discussed renovations in the area of the Municipal Liquor
Store for soma time. The parking lot does not lend itself well to
camper trailer or pick-up trailer combinations. It is proposed that
we about double the size of the existing parking lot and provide
camper/trailer parking, and in addition that we install new lighting
for the parking lot and building and install a now sign. It seems
logical to combine the liquor store parking lot with the Otter Creek
project to achieve better bid prices. The actual signing and lighting
could be done through a local contractor. The parking lot construction
is estimated to coat in the area of 426,000, including the necessary
engineering. we would request that OSM do the initial design setting
the grades for the curb and surface, and the City would do much of
the inspection on the project. In addition, we could have the water sprinkler
service relocated and the storm sower put in through a local contractor.
An estimate of the coat in enclosed for your review.
The lighting system could cost in the area of 45,000 to $7,000 depending
upon how much work is required. we have soma initial estimates that
indicate it could be in this range. we would do the lighting, of
course, through a local contractor rather than as part of the parking
lot bid. It is possible that the sign construction could be rolled
in with the sign for City Hall at a future date.
-5-
Council Agenda - 5/26/87
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to authorize plane and specifications
to be drawn for both projects, authorize review by the City staff,
and then advertisement for bide to be reviewed by the Council
at a later date.
2. The second alternative would be to delete the liquor store project
at this time and do additional study and/or planning.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the staff recommendation that the Council authorize the preparation
of plana and specifications, review, and advertisement for bids as
outlined in alternative number one. we would then continue with
our lighting plana and sign plane to work concurrently with the construction.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of estimate from OSM for Otter Creek; Copy of "E221h sketch"
of municipal parking lot and estimated cost.
-6-
MUNICIPAL PARKING LOT
EXPANSION AT LIQUOR
STORE
Blacktop Removal
5 1,000
Grading
2,500
CB Adjust
100
Storm Sever
2,000
Relocate Water Service
300
B6-18 Curb
3,300
Blacktop 25°
11,500
Claes V
3,000
523,700
Engineering
2,370
$26,070
Lights $5,000 to 57,000
Sign 510,000
01
ORR•SCHEIEN•MAYERON BASSOCIATES, INC.
Gn"a .•h r; [n(1inccrs Division of Kidde Consultants, Inc.
iuvols
OTTER CREEK ROAD REALIGNMENT
MONTICELLO. MINNESOTA
MAY 20, 1987
COST ESTIMATE
( Grading and Mobilization
Remove Bituminous:
Aggregate, Class 5:
Pavement, Bituminous:
Turf Restoration:
Lump Sum -
S 2,000.00
600 S.Y. x $2.00 -
1,200.00
300 Tons x $6.00 a
1,800.00
300 Tons x $30.00
9,000.00
Lump Sum •
1,000.00
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST
Basic Engineering Services
Construction Engineering Services
TOTAL PROJECT COST
$15,000.00
1,650.00
1,650.00
$18,300.00
i i '),I /a, r` 011 , , , ".•vt , ,t . S . ..: , C •nuu_ w76 ,:1.- Y , ' ' Of
Pi N
'AGCR[SS•• �Ii:iR�.!''%15; 1' t• ,. :I •PERMITtAIMER
,.,�fl: .I�. It•'��:?•.li,`..,•i �.•
:CRIPTION :;LOT" ••�"I CLOCK ACDITtOti
:0. £T. Or 311
C AREA SO. FT. OF AFEA OCCIPiED OY GUI LCIN.G
' �/�; •'• rte
NS1:t.XTION9 M APPLICANT
TM10 rORN NCCD NOT OE•U3ED WHEN PLOT PLANS -DRAWN TO 3CALC ARE rILCO WITH THE PERMIT APPLIC.T1a..
ON
MCV OU/La1142. PROV IDC THC ToLLOVINe INrORMATiaNl LOCATION Or PROP03CO CCNSTRUCTIOM AND Cx ISTI,H3
I NPRO VCNCNT3. SHOW OUILOINC SITE AND SMACK OIMEN31ON3. SHOW CA3MENT3, PIHISN CONTOURS OR L�AIHp;E,
•'IR3T rLOON CLCVATION 3.'STACCT ELEVATION ANO 3CVCR ELEVATION. SHOW LOCATION Cr WATLR, SCVCH# CAS.
""0 ELCCTR IC
AL aCRY ICE LINED. SHOW LOCATIONS Or SURVEY PINS" 3PCCIIY THE USC Or CACH OUILOINC
.NO EACH MAJOR rOATlON ~TN[REO/♦ �,
MOICATE NORTH IN CIRCLEY EACH GRAPH 'ZUARE MALS IOt.O" CY 101-0"
l: V11. a.3l.lY Ih.t tTif Wc�IARO CL•sNI,YCL3R wa1 gRt."tIN1 tp IM eiNWRFDM • W rt {ht'wn k.'xi Aa101R.1 rA aRar�.I n.;, T+f �t,A,;t w,;R„'si
tGTtaatam,q c. �rc,Y.L ,� _ �)J Z5
.J '%Aw/..a7Q7EaTpRt
i.............fisi............................
(reA em use onr)
,: �...o,� A►►ICTCD 05'x,==.,.._�-�.=.�..s.=� .� _
t,
Council Agenda - 5/26/87
7. Liquor Store Report - let Quarter. (R.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Enclosed with the agenda you will find a copy of the first quarter
liquor store financial statement comparing 1987 with 1986. Nr. Joe
Hartman will be in attendance at the meeting to answer any questions
you may have in regards to the operations.
In reviewing the statements, you will notice that the sales for the
first quarter increased approximately $15,700 over the same period
last year, or W. percent higher. The gross profit percentage was
also up approximately 45 percent over last year, resulting in a gross
profit of $42,228. Operating expenditures remained almost the same
for the first quarter as last year resulting in an operating income
increase of $1,728 to a total of $9,642. The operating income increased
approximately 21 percent over the same period last year. Overall,
the gross profit percentages appear reasonable with a 21 percent
gross profit on sales, which is in the target area for our store.
Typically, the first quarter does not show a great amount of operating
income, whereas the majority of the income produced by the liquor
store occurs in the second and third quarters.
No action is necessary by the Council other than review of the report
/l as presented.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the first quarter financial report.
-7-
� J
MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR
BALANCE SHEET
- MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE
MARCH 31. 2987 ANp 1986
........................................ c....vv....s.cv.a...ae....c..a...c...c......................................................
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
CASH IN DANA - CHECKING
CHANGE FUND
INVEST MENTB
1 ACCOUNTS R'CCES VADLE
NSF CHECK - RECEIVABLE
INVENT ORTE9
PREPAID INSURANCE
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
PROPERTY AND EOUIPMCNT
LANG
BUILDINGS AND IMPROVEMENTS
C PARKING LOT
• FURNI LURE AND FIXTURCS
-IY ACCUM. DEPR. - PAFAINO LO7
ACCUM DEPR-FURNITURE • FIXTURE
ACCUM. DEPR. - DUILDINO9
Ni
TOTAL PROPERTY AND COUIPMENI
TOTAL ASSETS
�yC
i
1�
FY
8
1
51.211.28
1.000.00
443.412.91
.00
172.72
103.666.41
11.782.09
• 613.245.31
• 25.996.36
1.000.00
333.77:.22
1.237.36
51.36
99.433.03
9.124.66
______________
• 470.616.99
6.839.95 • 6.139.95
151.671.04 151.671.0•
.45015.50 5.54815.5301
(6.0. 00
78300 5
U 5.954.167 (40.564.481
(42.496.25) (30.366.751
--------------
• 130.253.39 0
140.190.57
------------6 74
-
I
4••
L
MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIOUOR
BALANCE SHEET
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE
.................................................................................s..................................
MARCH 31. 1987 AND 1986
LIABILITIES AND
EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 6
36.233.72
•
28.567.29
LIQUOR SALES I %
19.069.00)
.00
ACCRUED SICK LEAVE • VACATIONS
603.32
603.52
PAYROLL U/H - STATE
.00
110.00
PAYROLL U/H - FEDERAL
.00
305.00
SALARIES PAYABLE
1.027.53
1.370.33
PAYROLL Y/H - FICA
91.65
2.5,60
PAYROLL U/H - PERA
151.07
120.06
BALES 1A% PAYABLE
16.868.62
5.016.68
0
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
--------------
•
--------------
66.690.11
• 37.616.26
pap
�B LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
--------------
• TOTAL LONG-IERM LIABILITIES •
�R TOTAL LIABIL17JES
p "U117
RETAINED EARNINGS • 603.356.00
REVENUES OVER C%PENDI7URCS -----15_656 9
I DIAL EOUIIY
I TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
1
L
C�
J
.00
66.690.11
--------------
00
637.616 26
6 560.157.11
--_--13_236.19
690_800_59 6 573.391.30
• 763.690.70 • 610.807.56
1
I )
C .J
V J
a ti
-
MON710ELLO MUNICIPAL
LIQUOR
REVENUE
AND EXPENSES
-;�
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE
l
...........................................
....v.............n...........................c......s....cc............nc......................n...........................c.ecncv
FOF iNE
THREE MON1H5 ENDED MARCH 31. 1907
AND 1986
CURRENT-PERIOD
CUR-PD
YEAR-TO-DATE
Y-7-D
SAME-PD-LST-YR
PD-LYR
Y-1-D-LST-YR
YTD-LY
AMOUNT
RATIO
AMOUNT
RATIO
AMOUNT
RATIO
AMOUNT
RAT ICI
SALES
L IOUOR
• 60.676.92
30.20 •
60.676.92
30.20 •
57.101.75
30.83 •
57.101.73
30.83
BE
110.388.99
54.95
110.388.99
54.95
97.501.40
2.65
97.501.40
2.65
.1
WINE
24.729.84
12.31
24.729.84
12.31
24.455.59
1].21
24.455.59
13.21
'
OTHER MDSE
5.416.18
2.70
5.416.18
2.70
4.867.10
2.63
4.867.10
2.63
MISC. NON-IAXADLE SALES
1..37.30
.91
1.837.30
.91
.232.41
^(778.19)
1.21
.232.e1
1.21
DEPOSITS AND REFUNDS
(1.765.45)
(.68)
(1.765.45)
1.88)
(.42)
(778.19)
1.42) .)
BOTTLE DEPOSII - MIS
32.27
.02
32.27
.02
41.66
.02
41.66
.02
DISCOUN76
(424.55)
1.21)
(424.55)
(.21)
(227.03)
1.121
(227.03)
(.12)
)�
TOTAL SALES
• 200.891.50
100.00 6
200.891.50
300.00 •
185.194.69
100.01 •
105.194.69
100.01
-)
COST OF GOODS BOLD
• (158.663.35)
(7B.98)•
(158.663.35)
(78.98) •
(144.801.35)
(78.19)6
(144.803.35)
(76.19)
---_40.391.34
•
GROSS PROFIT
• 42.220.15
21.0. •
4_r-^0.15
_1.0_ •
40.191.34
_1.02 •
21.82
•
GENERAL AND ADIM. EXPENSES
1
')5
PERSONAL SERVICES
SALARIES. REGULAR
• 16.525.36
8.23 •
16.525.36
0.23 •
17.746.64
7.42 •
13.746.64
7.42 )
a
PERA
499.27
.25
499._7
.25
433.9.
.23
437.90
.21
INSURANCE. MEDICAL AND LIFE
065.82
.4B
965.02
.48
704.61
.4-
s
794.61
SOCIAL SECURITY
996.06
_____________
.50
996.08
.50
675.63
.36
67^.63
.36
-)
IOTAL PCROCINAL SERVICES
• 10.906.53
--- ___
9.46 •
IB.986.t;3
------
9.46 •
_..____--- __
1^.6^0.06
------
0.44 •
_____� _--___
1^.150.86
__--43
0.44
SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLI-6
• 90.46
.05 •
00.46
.05 •
226.06
.1. •
226.06
.12
• 4
OCNCRAL OPERATIN. £UPPL.E.
Ir1I1.82
------ -------
.55
------
1.111.02
.55
1.245.70
.67
1.245.79
.67
TOIAL SUPPLIES
• 1.210.28
.60 •
_________••--
1.210..8
------
.60 •
-------••.-_,
1.472.65
_-____
.79 •
....... --:._,
1.47^.6^
_..---
.19 _
I )
C .J
V J
a ti
�1
01
-
MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL
LIQUOR
REVENUE AND EXPENSES
MUNICIPAL
LIQUOR
STORE
..marrasssr.:ua«aso.s.wo.mo.wsu.«r.oae..a.emm.s..oawssaw.«.a.«awoss.a«.«ras..ewa.esaaaa«vwa.ress...sas.
FOR TME
THREE NONTHB ENDED MARCH 31. 1907
AND
1986
ssssre.e.sa
t..1
CURRENT -PERIOD
CUR -PD
YEAR -TO -LATE
Y -i -D
SAME -PD -LST -YR
PD-LYR
Y -T -D -LST -YR
YTD -LY
AMOUNT
RATIO
AMOUNT
RATIO
AMOUNT
RATIO
!MOUNT
RATIO
OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES GES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (AUDIT) •
33C.00
.16 •
330.00
.16
6
379.00
0 6
379.00
.20
COMMUNICATION
215.21
.21
215.21
.11
121.54
.07
321.54
.07
r1
TRAVEL -CONFERENCE -SCHOOLS
184.20
.09
104.20
.09
170.80
.09
170.80
.09
ADVERT18IN0
523.00
.26
523.00
.26
310.00
.17
330.00
.17
INSURANCE. GENERAL
3,341.38
1.66
3.341.38
1.66
✓.447.03
2.94
3.447.03
2.94
UTILITIES• ELECTRICAL
1.517.37
.76
1.517.37
.76
1.375.63
.74
1,375.65
.74 -1
UTILITIES, MEATI NO
440.71
.22
440.71
.22
1.404.28
.76
1.404.2.13
.76
UT ILI TIER. S S Y
59.92
.03
59.92
.03
52.0@
,OS
52.00
.03
-T�
MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT
2.021.48
1.40
2.821.48
1.40
1.884.00
1.92
1.004.00
1.02
EQUIPMENT
192.70
.10
192.70
.10
1.144.00
.62
2.144.00
.62
DUES. MEMBERSHIP. SUBSCRIPTION
10.00
.00
10.00
+00
.00
.00
.00
.00
-)
+"
GARBAGE
400.50
.20
490,50
.20
274.50
.15
274,50
.15 .
1, ACQUIRED - ACQUIRED ASSETS
2.352.01
1.17
2.352.01
1.17
2.5.8.30
1.37
- 5.8.30
-__••__�•-_--
1.37
------
TOTAL OTHER SERVICES S CHARSES6
-----------••
12,389.28
------
6.16 6
-------------
12.389.28
---••_
6.16
-------------
6
15.091.26
------
6.16 6
13.091.26
0.16 l
DEBTSERVICE
INTER EBT •
.00
247.50
.13 f
247.50
.13
1�
>)
PAYING AGENT FEES
.00
.00
.00
.00
S4,B5
.01
14.85
---•�--«0:.35
.03
---.I4
TOTAL DEBT SERVICES •
---�------.Otl
---.00 •
_--•----_-.00
•.00
f l--.«--262.33
+_-.14 f
l�
TOTAL GENERAL S ADIM. EXPENSES!
09
16«22 •
09
f
-17.53 6
-_--32_477.12
-17.53
l
TOTAL OPERATING INCOME •
_--`32.586
9,642.06
-
4.00 •
`-32-506
------------
9.642.06
-16.22
4.80
^---32^_477.12
6
7.914.22
4.29 6
7,914.22
4.29
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSCW
1
�f
INTEREST INCOME 6
5,652.51
2.01 6
5.632.51
2.81
6
5.234.75
2.03 •
5.234.75
2.03
OTHER 3xCONC
98.79
.OS
98.79
.03
80.51
+OS
89,53
.05
CASH 1-0X0/SHOR7
61."3
------ -----
.03
--- -
61.23
------- --` -
.03
......
---
14.291
- -
••5.319.97
( 001
......
(4.29)
------ --
(.00)
------ .�
TOTAL OTHER INCOME tEXPENSCS) i
5.822.53
2.89 f
3.812.53
2.89
6
2.08 f
5.319.97
2.08
_...__-..-...
......
.............
......
.-__•--------
"----
__-......._...
..__... `
NET INCOME 4
13,454.59
.............
7.69 4
.uu.
15,654.59
.............
7.69
......
f
.............
13.234.29
7.17 6
...s..
13.234.19
.......uuo..
T.17 v
.o«..
�1
01
7
pa
J
.J
J
MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL
LIQUOR
Pesa 1
GROSS PROFIT BY PRODUCT SOLD
.,...ww...w......................................................w....w..............................w....w..........................
For the Period
01/01/67
to 03/31/87
Current
- Period
Year - to - Det4
Sere -Period -Last -Yr
Year -to -Date -Lest -Yr
Amount
Y
Amount
Z
Amount
Y
Amount
2
+
LIQUOR SALES
6
60+676.92
100.70 6
60.676.92
100.70 6
57.101.75
100.40 6
57.101.75
100.40
DISCOUNTS
t
424.55)
t .70) <
424.55)
< .70) t
227.03!
t .40) t
227.03)
< .40)
COST OF SALES - LIQUOR
78.18
04
78.18 ----43.945`46
------
77.27
-------------------
43.945.48
77.27
------
GROSS PROFIT
-«
•
-47.107.04
�__�'---
13.145.33
��-_'_ ---_47_107
21.82 s
13.145.33
21.02 6
12.929.24
22.73 •
12.929.24
22.73
.............
...... ............•
...... .............
...... .............
......
BEER SALES
130.388.99
101.63
110.308.99
101.63
97,501.40
100.80
97.501.40
100.80
DEPOSITS AND REFUNDS
f
I.765.45)
l 1.63) 4
1.765.45)
( 1.63) f
778.19)
f .80) f
778.19)
t .80)
COST OF BALES - SEER««-
86_057 69
79.96
06.837.69
79.96
80.44
37
80.44
«--
-_-«77.003.37
~20.04
--.-77,903
GROSS PROFIT
•
21.765.05
20.04 •
21.765.85
♦
18,919.04
-9.5- ♦
Q.............
...... .............
...... .............
...... .^'..0.9199.04
.19.
WINE SALES
..
2472984
.
10000
24,72984
.
.
10000
«4.455. �59
100,00
^.4.453.59
100.00
+
COST OF SALES - WINE
71.10
71.10
--_.«-..._--«-
15.084.15
63.72 ---
...--
-
63.72
------
GROSS PROFIT
-«--17.603.50
•
...-.
7.126.26
...--.. __--17_607--0
28.02 •
7.126.26
..-..«_
20.02 ♦
8.871.44
36.28 4
0.071.44
36.20
j.............
...... .............
w..... .............
...... .............
......
.OTHER BALES
5.416.18
99.41
5.416.18
99.41
4.067.10
99.15
4,867,10
99.15
BOTTLE DEPOSIT - MISC
32.27
.59
32.27
.59
41.66
.85
41.66
.05
COOT OF OALE8 - OTHER
1.31
4,430-36
36
1.31
+10.69
4,996.53
-
-
Sol0.4:
------
GROSS PROFIT
•
1.018.09
«18.69 •
1.018.09
6l
77.77!
l 1158)•(
77.77
77.77)
t 1.50)
.w.o....0
..
.•. ..
.8.... ....
. .77...
.....0. .r...r..
.91.59
to
loc.. NON-TAXADLE SALES
COS MISC. NOW TAXABLE
1.037.30
1.560.30
100.00
85.30
1.837.30
1.568.30
(00.00
85.36
1111.. ---.-...---'•-
2.«32.41
1.442.45
100.00
64.6)
------ _1111_..---•--
2,232.41
1.412.45
100.00
64.61
-«..39
GROSS PROFIT
1111..--•----
•
260.92
-----,. ..--1111«..«-_«.
14.64 •
260.92
14.64 6
.............
709.96
35.39 •
....w. .............
709.96
35.39
......
TOTAL SALES
.............
201.03.70
...... .............
955.41
201.«03.70
......
M.41
185.380.06
304.03
105.380.06
304.03
TOTAL COST OF SALES
158.663.35
635.68
150.663.33
635.60
144,003.35
486.41
---------------«---
144,803.35
406.41
------
TOTAL GROSS PROFIT
-----
6
--------
42.620.43
--------------«----
319.73 6
42.620.43
-------------------
319.73 6
40.576.71
817.62 s
40.576.71
017.62
«�
V
.............
...... .............
...... .............
...... .............
......
f
Y
7
pa
J
.J
J
Council Agenda - 5/26/87
8. Consideration of Granting a Conditional Use for Minor Auto Repair
in a B-4 Zone. Applicant, Jim Eisele. (G.A.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Mr. James Eisele is proposing to purchase the old metal building
on the next lot near the northwest corner of our new Monticello Fire
Station lot. The type of use Mr. Eisele is proposing for this building,
once it is completely resided and reroofed to make it look similar
to the new Monticello Fire Station and is more conforming to the
residential properties around it, is to park and store old vehicles
which he plans to restore.
With the current zoning which exists on this parcel of land, B-4
(Regional Business), the only way this type of activity could be
allowed would be as a conditional use. A copy of the conditions
for this type of activity is submitted with this supplement. The
use of the building for Mr. Eisele's minor auto repair will be very
incidental in nature in that Mr. Eisele will only be working there
when he has the time, and it won't be a full-fledged business that
he will be operating there at this time.
Mr. Eisele might. sometime in the future, establish a small business
here refurbishing/restoring vehicles. When and if it does come to
thls point, Mr. Eisele would not like to run into any problems if
he would go into a full-fledged small business at this location.
Mr. Eisele fully intends to clean up the site and make it more similar
in appearance to what is existing there, our new Monticello Fire
Station and existing residences.
Mr. Eisele stopped by with another proposal in which he would like
to demolish the existing building and place a now structure in back
of this existing building. If allowed to demolish the existing structure
and place a now structure on the lot, he would than have a place
for off-street parking and would also pull the new building back
further on the lot away from 5% Street and asks better use of the
entire lot. As part of this request, he would like to be allowed
to leave the existing slab for the existing building for the time
being; and sometime in the future he would like to completely remove
the slab and existing severely inclined driveway and replace it with
a new slab and parking lot.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Approve the conditional use request to allow minor auto repair
In a B-4 (Regional Business) Zone.
2. Deny the conditional use request to allow minor auto repair in
a B-4 (Regional Business) zone.
-B-
C
C
Council Agenda - 5/26/87
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the conditional use request to allow
minor auto repair in a B-4 (Regional Business) Zone. Staff would
also consider opting to go with Mr. Eisele -s second proposal to demolish
the existing building and build a new one. Staff also recognizes
a variance from one of the conditions in the conditional use request
in that the lot does not have 100 feet of lot frontage. Mr. Eisele
will be cleaning up a blighted area, and with the type of use Mr.
Eisele is proposing for this property, it would be of a lesser density
type use in that it would blend more with the residential use which
is adjacent to this.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the location of the conditional use request; Copy of the
site plan; Copy of the conditions with the conditional use request;
Copy of Mr. Eisele -s new proposed demolition and new construction
use of this property.
-g.
r
' CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
FOR
JIM EISELE
DENOTES0
IRON MONUMENT SET
}5
I A • RON MONUMENT FOUND
I
NORTH HALF OF LOT 1. BLOCK 12.
/ MONT/CEL LO,
/. WR/GM! COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
— - - -- - - - +Ra PREPARED Ia our . &..
'(E•rff Ar Two SUWVEV. 0-4N OR /IES'
I"----- -- Br N[ OR t/mER Yr WOfCr lUPERNSI�
\ TAYLOR LAND SURVEYORS INC, AND rwr MMISTERED FO SLPVDOR uwI
230 wwr BROq my. P.O. BOX IT9 THE ILA" OT THE STATE Or 1YINNESOTn,
MONTICELLO. MWAI SOM 33362 • i' /
PwME • ( 612 ) 293.3388 m loo fDom
•• \ OT1M19 v. rArIDRrT R('O NO If
DOTE
uwr r ' uu.u� .. � r.�..w 1 ru•�2_w 1 Nrf I u.I NM � •w w
9. At the boundaries of a residential district,
a strip of not less than five (5) feet
shall be landscaped and screened in compliance
with Chapter 3, Section 2 EG) of this Ordinance.
10. Each light standard landscaped.
11. Parking or car magazine storage space shall
be screened from view of abutting residential
districts in compliance with Chapter 3,
Section 2 (G) of this Ordinance.
12. Vehicular access points shall create a
minimum of conflict with through traffic
movement, shall comply with Chapter 3,
Section 5 of this Ordinance and shall be
subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
13. All signing and informational or visual
communication devices shall be minimized
tand shall be in compliance with Chapter
3,Saction 9 of this Ordinance.
16. Provisions are made to control and reduce noise.
15. No outside storage except as allowed in, compliance
with Chapter 13, Section 6 of this ordinance.
16. Sale of products other than those specifically
mentioned in Chapter 13, Section a be subject
to a conditional use permit and beirn'.compliance
with Chapter 13, Section a (P) of this
ordinance.
17. All conditions pertaining to a specific
site are subject to change when the Council,
upon investigation in relation to a formal
request, finds that the general welfare
and public betterment can be served as
well or better by modifying the conditions.
18. The provisions of Chapter 22 of this Ordinance
are considered and satisfactorily met.
( ED] Motor Fuel station, auto repair -minor and tire
and battery stores and service provided that:
1. Regardless of whether the dispensing, sale
or offering for sale of motor fuels and/or
oil is incidental to the conduct of the
use or business, the standards and requirements
imposed by this Ordinance for motor fuel
stations shall apply: These standards
and requirements are, however, in addition
to other requirements which are imposed
for other uses of the property.
2. The architectural appearance and functional
plan of the building and site shall not
be so dissimilar to the existing buildings
or area as to cause impairment in property
values or constitute a blighting influence
within a reasonable distance of the lot.
3. The entire site other than that taken up
by a building, structure or plantings shall
be surfaced with a material to control
dust and drainage which is subject to the
approval of the City Engineer.
a. A minimum lot area of twenty-two thousand
five hundred (22,500) square feet and minimum
lot dimensions of one hundred fifty (150)
feet by one hundred thirty (130) feet.
5. A drainage system subject to the approval
of the City Engineer shall be installed.
6. A curb not less than six (6) inches above
grade shall separate the public sidewalk
from motor vehicle service areas.
7. The lighting shall be accomplished in "9 uch
a way as to have no direct source of light
visible from adjacent land in residential
use or from the public right-of-way and
shall be in compliance with Chapter 3,
Section 2 (H1 of this Ordinance.
S. wherever fuel pumps are to be installed.
pump islands shall be installed.
~_' �____-_-----..�T='�_-rte_.-,� `_-:'-- - .... •. _--==--•� -_ — — -._.._�_
cm I �z
L
� M
1 r
FRONT §-7LC-VAT/ON
c
1
' - c
pq ;N �i vRsiDN
40
fr QNS %L�
'M-O Z-D' i•D•
?\ CkN
ti
I
�4
t't7• nS MALT SNINI+R
x114• ffyT QU-r.
ROOF YEOTVnL
ItE. MgMU/OCT0U0 3W109
ern MSUL ancm no+rcn
z0 15'a, TY -L ••'tyP5UM MAIM "� Sid Rei" sari>
Iz• wr utr�t. ,.� (n/e • Taft • r • tyawa noArta
---({ RID INSLUL,
Gtl"tK Vpf • oc
VY O *14MM YLi Q VOL `
J 8' O'C nLw k
..........
+•mML S4PC W1 REw.L.1. •O WLLMI
CRC SECTION
<i.�y
tJ7 '+r
f!} ��\�.
�7 O. � �
H � �„�
�i rB �
Council Agenda - 5/26/87
9. Consideration of Traffic Study on West County Road 39 from Elm Street
to I-94. W .S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
I have been informed that Paul Ditty intends to petition the City
Council at Tuesday evenings meeting to perform another traffic study
of West County Road 39 in hopes of lowering the existing 40 mph speed
limit.
As you may recall, at the request of Mrs. Marilyn Fria and Leo Maser,
the City asked the County to perform a traffic study of this section
of road in September of 1984. That traffic study was performed,
and ultimately the Minnesota Department of Transportation authorized
the entire stretch of road to be zoned for 40 mph. The City then
petitioned the County for a major widening of this road and the addition
of bicycle path type shoulders to make this a much safer road. The
County concurred with our request, and the project is now under construction.
The construction project was designed to state aid standards and
a portion of the funding is coming through the State Aid Agency.
The road, as designed, meats the requirements of a 40 mph roadway
design. The City decided not to assess any of the cost of construction
except for a small portion of curb and gutter to the residents.
The entire City share is coming from ad valorem taxes.
l�
It is my opinion as Public Works Director that a traffic study in
the middle of a construction project would be useless to say the
least. I spoke with Mr. Dave Montebello, the County Project Engineer
who initiated the last traffic study, and his opinion was the same.
If a traffic study is to be again performed in this area, it should
wait until the construction in complete and the traffic flow and
patterns are back to normal. At that time and only that time can
the traffic speeds, right and left turns, and pedestrian safety be
determined. The construction is due to be completed by the and of
the summer.
If the Council so chooses to authorize or petition the County for
a traffic study, such a petition could be sent in now. But it should
be worded in such a way as to request the study at the completion
of the project after normal traffic patterns have returned. There
has been an increase in the number of living units along this section
of highway, but it Is doubtful that this factor, when weighed against
the now design of the roadway, would ultimately result in a speed
reduction loss than 40 mph in this area.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to request now that the County perform
a traffic study on West County Road 39 after the completion of
the project and traffic patterns have returned to normal.
-10-
Council Agenda - 5/26/87
2. The second alternative would be to deny the petition for the
traffic study.
3. The third alternative would be to table the consideration of
a traffic study until after completion of the project, traffic
patterns have returned to normal, and property owners still feel
strongly about a speed reduction.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Having not seen the petition at the time of the drafting of this
agenda supplement, as Public Works Director,I have the following
two recommendations. If the petition has a significant portion of
the residents along West County Road 39 between Elm Street and I-94
as signators, my recommendation would be to opt for alternative number
one. If the petition has only a few signatures on it. I would recommend
the Council opt for alternative number three and wait until the project
is completed. Traffic studies of this type, as well as engineering
review, spend taxpayers dollars. They should not be entered into
at the whim of one or two unhappy citizens without ample justification.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the petition from Paul Ditty.
Sum
MI 7.1981
Yf 111, UINIURSIGNto NISIIIFNIR 16 7110 0171 LIF AUN11f.I1L11 MO. FIIIU
LIVI
II! Illi. ANIAS IIDRIII AIIU SUUIII UI' VLSI I.UUfliI RD-39 111"I III
III UUI SI 1111. C111 III MUNI ICLLLU 111 AGGRLSSIVFL,' PURS11L III I 1111.
Hllllilll CIIlINl1 IIIIiIIYf• DI.PAIIIMIUI 6 IIIL YR (Gill CUUI117 IIIGIIYA'
I ll1i1 IN IR A". YAINC 1IIILALSUT. OUR Nf LO IUP
UUUIII I. 11LLUY 110 1A56IIIG I IIILU AIN A IHIRII M111 PIR hill""
',Pf I U I.IAt, UN YE SI C'ON[I "D. 39 DLIYELN IIIL 194 U:'I Itl`A'�. l41U
IIM SIRlll.
11115 If1UU1'il IS IT CLSSARI DUL IU 1111: IIUIIDLFI OF
ALL 111L1114 MR) NEAR MISSES CAUSID UI 1.x L1551VL SPIIU AIIU IA'.'i 1111)
IIT I1IIli SIRI ILII OF RUAU.7111 AMOUNT UI' IRA" It: UN 11115 ARIA 111
YI til 1.1 A1NILf RU.39 INS JIICRIA51U )III.
111 IIIE NUMBLR 111 RI '. I UI 11111A
ANU MITI III LI ()Yl.l 1"IIIGS RLIILI 111 III IASI 2 ,FARS.I111 Tufl IIt UI
11111 ORFII USINU Illlti All fl OF YL 51 LUUNIY "U." lint IRAVII IN
;.1.1111f)I..II11. 1IPIIARY AIIU ULISINL!i5L5 HA!i GRI.AI1.1 IIILRLASI0 Alit, I'll'
1111 runs PILI IIF A IRAGLUY WAS ALSO INCXIA'.,LD.
11U11 I.1 1 Y Iln', 51 111 IIIL 11155 UC LI IMI. III UUA 11111111414 11111 111
IRAII IC ALLIDF.NIS III IIIE IASI 2 IF ARS Al1U W' DI I.ILVE 1111' UIII UII II,
I IVIS IMI WI If.I1; 111E COSI UI" 1111. PAIRI. 1111. 61 GNS AI'U IIII.
LIR UIfLCAI NI TI CIL SSARY IU L'IVILIlC 11115 SIXCILII UI OUTWIT.
O•ANP YOU IDR YOUR PROMPT AT ILNUUU.
3 d
zG
wh'�r r
3f-
_7,7
s 37 r4: c -.I .,
�� .b• 3 3 � cwoi..p r i
y1 1 9 �acF'r6y °0�'' Ijl''t�.f�i1
,L•ny
�'✓ .nays �
cx(rd11ta,d a'S �auLc�'cc /� ') f
/Y' 11.11 I
J 4 ZIAb
161
c7, a V4")
o s r _ (a!/�
/'i✓
./1Gut,l •,r ��. ,.,,b.� �.1, .i1MlA..w�
C.Ie.J'�hJrr�"J /P �Aryf�n�aDn F4�nrII.r1..
I�w.�Kf � h� lei' i..I....j iw . dY•x lr�rl•:
'�a911� ; �,),I.LyYIt 14 cVALV1A .Dr. �i(Sl��cu�c'j
�IIrF,,....� 1��„,".,.... •> '� f4�.�J.1.,, -111,,1 r�. �:
/ r
1 WAt
ISl
/1. l S.
C"'
Ate•
tat
,ICU CN65r��
Ll C—q-
pif
Aw.
Ce -4
/OV/
C(L
q rc,
7q
12., 16,
'kLIL
ra-cy,
ooj
eA"Ilf
14
4 'e-q-
0-7-
ado-
/0-,Alp6-
(1j'A" " ; e
Y
jj
./�•:roy /i^f /. (�.%t��.G
/G�i1J
GP ��ic,.a.rSC. At�.
�17n��-S t,,,uur'--
4 F°P'•Pa Cu+✓ .
�u& 6
8vq ed.
it+ku lu��^/
uYG���%bCedw
Pvl .9
7k
UG
see
C-- Qj. �
G...
9)5 G.A
1�`�•t e�
X15 ���jrutle �.
qr5 cdfCvvVLR .rr Gcc-& mom.
if
7157 4::a
6)....— 4w
�d�uPu
ff „t,cia
c� O-.::,pj
q( soy
i
rx
m�
Wa, uzlS?n
<07 w.P OA CLUu AP -1.
qi-r
444
q>i-�"i.o
'3vqa
-LON.l C��o Opt
.
(3'L VJC k)1LC0.i
'71160(6 Cau". kd- E!`/Of
c�cl�tJr i7�f � 1yi
»r9�
/ Z.,
leV.
1'7
(�� f/ rf•CL'>'/�"'ir
! / % rr r r 'r u f r r
m�
Wa, uzlS?n
<07 w.P OA CLUu AP -1.
qi-r
t C��1 rt,,nfri PRo
Vlji U
-LON.l C��o Opt
'/t�\CUI�,,.1��/...��+-..u.1
(3'L VJC k)1LC0.i
'71160(6 Cau". kd- E!`/Of
c�cl�tJr i7�f � 1yi
Q7 Qjr %rur is (d-
-t7
leV.
1'7
Z
Minnesota
Department of Transportation
District Five
5801 Duluth Street
Golden Valley, Minnesota 53422
(612) S45-3761
November 2, 1984
Wayne Fingalson, Engineer
County of Wright
Route 1, Box 97B
Buffalo, MN 55313
Re: Speed toning - CSAH 39
Wright County
Dear Mr. Fingalson:
A speed zoning study has been completed on CSAH 39 as requested by the
Wright County Board in Resolutions 83-28 and 84-42. The study was made
by District 5 personnel at the request of District 3. As discussed
with you previously, we have recommended authorization of the following
speed limits for CSAH 39.
30 MPH - between the vest function with CSAH 75 and the inter-
section of Elm Street with Golf Course Road
40 MPH - between the intersection of Elm Street with Golf Course
Road and a point 300 feet west of Country Club Road
55 MPH - between a point 300 feet west of Country Club Road and
the intersection with Cameron Road.
The recommended speed limits will be reviewed by the state traffic
engineer who will then issue a formal speed limit authorization for the
new limits. Please note that as agreed during discussion of the inves-
tigation results, the proposed 55 MPH zone extends approximately 0.6
mile vest of the segment defined by the resolutions. A map shoving the
speed limit changes along with copies of data from the study is enclosed
for your information.
Following are suggestions that you might want to consider when making
the signing changes necessary to implement the new speed limits:
✓1) Because of the increase in speed limit over the 1-94 bridge, a
new survey for no passing zones could be warranted at that
Iocatton.
.2) Some existing signs on CSAH 39 might warrant replacement.becau"
of their condition (low reflectivity, etc.).
At, Equal Oppw,luxwy Employer
Wayne Fingalsou
November 2. 198%
Page Two
A) The existing "DO NOT PASS" signs are not as visible as would
be desired. (An eastbound sign Just west of the 1-94 bridge
Is obscured by vegetation.) Use of "No Passing Zone" pen-
nants would make signing more effective.
,.4) Because of the curve Just west of the Elm Street/Golf Course
Road intersection, a dual stop sign installation could be
considered for eastbound CSAH 39 instead of the single sign
now used.
.5) ye suggest continued use of the "Begin Speed Limit" sign for
the eastbound approach to the 40 MPH zone. Both the "Begin
Speed Limit 40" and the first eastbound "Speed Limit 40"
signs can be oversized (3611x48") if needed for emphasis.
.6) The 55 MPH zone was recommended to prevent automatic increase
to a 65/55 MPH speed limit if energy conservation measures
were ended. Since the current statutory rural speed limit
is 55 MPH, it should not be necessary to totally define the
zone with speed limit signs at this time unless you wish to
do so.
a) A "no parking zone" should be considered for the approaches
to the school crosswalk at Elm Street and 3rd Street. Parked
vehicles can currently obscure driver's vision of the school
patrol.
If you have any Questions concerning either the enclosed data or our
recoimaendations, please contact Ed Brown at extension 172 at this
office.
Sincerely,
1IN/
J. S. Katz, P.E. _
District Traffic Engineer
Enclosure:
Investigation data
JSK:pn:EB
S.
1
Titil telM
f 1LL1•Il CW.
tsummit CLt000110.
! lUM1Il CIA.
f CCFtCOCil.
! 111;, "All Oil.
•,II It1.OLt1 CIA.
1. OT CCOCwCtll 110.
•. C:TMtV tit,
• C11L1 CII,
10. "'1,
of t11It110t L+t.
.t ."I tett 1, C,
M.
1! 011 LC
11, IM1Yt1 Cil.
""^'" UrSTIIQ 30 i. SPiTD LIMIT
NI+W n, 3Pr'!;� LIMIT
"""•�• 1'J(IST 5 MPII, t;PFJp LIMI?
_/ �1rV LO MI11. 3PEM LIMIT
most '�' S9 MPII. SPlim LIMIT
MAP OF
MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY
POP. 2830
State i'. 1600
GENERAL FUND -- MAY
AMOUNT
CHECK NO.
Motor - Magazine sub. - Public Works Director
14.00
24180
Dahlgren, Shardlov - Professional services
14,613.47
24181
Wright County Assessor's Office - 1987 Homestead cards
284.92
24182
Tom Eidem - Paint sprayer rental - City house
33.60
24183
Anoka County Social Service - Payroll ded.
204.00
24184
ICMA Retirement Corp. - Payroll ded.
614.34
24185
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded.
123.04
24186
Mrs. Beverly Johnson - Animal control expense
275.00
24187
Jerry Hermes - Library janitorial
216.67
24188
David Stromberg - Animal control expense
287.50
24189
Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees
255.00
24190
Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees
18.00
24191
Corrow Sanitation - April contract payment
6,653.20
24192
James Preusse - Cleaning city hall
358.33
24193
YMCA of Mpls. - Monthly contract payment
583.33
24194
Mr. Arve Grimsmo - Mayor salary
175.00
24195
Mr. Dan Blonigen - Council salary
125.00
24196
Mrs. Fran Fair - Council salary
125.00
24197
Mr. William Fair - Council salary
125.00
24198
Mr. Warren Smith - Council salary
12.3.19
24199
Mr. James Ridgeway - Planning Comm. salary
49.27
24200
Mrs. Joyce Dowling -
49.27
24201
Mr. Richard Carlson -
49.27
24202
Mrs. Barbara Koropchak -
49.27
24203
Mr. Dick Martie -
49.27
24204
State Treasurer - PERA
1,493.86
24205
Commissioner of Revenue - SWT - April
2,444.00
24206
Wright County State Bank - FICA W/H
5,080.78
24207
Melchert/Block Assoc. - Chelsea road project
3,861.04
24208
Preusse Cleaning - March 6 April cleaning at Fire Hall
100.00
24209
League of MN. Cities - Conf. req. fees - Eidem, Wolf., Fair
390.00
24210
LMC Housing - Rooms for Eidem, Wolfsteller, and Bill Fair
177.00
24211
Moores Excavating Co. - Exc. at Barthel residence
357.50
24212
Corrow Sanitation - Add'1. landfill chargee 6 leaf pickup
2,092.00
24213
Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees
369.00
24214
Dept. of Nat. Ree. - Dep. Reg. fees
36.00
24215
PSGI - k'WTP monthly contract payment
22,083.35
24216
North Central Public Service - Utilities
503.30
24217
Northern States Power - Utilities
6,042.54
24218
Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone
1,059.15
24219
City of Golden Valley - Reg. fee - Eidem - Comparable Worth
10.00
24220
Wright County State Bank - Investments
99,000.00
24221
Dahlgren, Shardlov - Professional services - Streetscape
163.75
24222
Smith- Pringle - Legal -(Annex. costs - $5,684.00,)etc.
6,734.00
24223
Springstad, Inc. - Bond fees - Const. 5 Tax Increment
10,990.87
24224
Ramier 6 Gries - Professional services
22.50
24225
Frank Madden 6 Assoc. - Personnel policy review fees
270.00
24226
Holmes 6 Graven - Const. 5 legal fees
338.00
24227
Academy for State 6 Local Govt. - Fee for service
100.00
24228
Purcell Plumbing - Supplies
3.13
24229
Feedrite Controls - Chlorine, etc.
1,570.81
24230
Vance's Service Center - Fire Dept. gas
67.77
24231
Corporate Report - Sub. for 2 years
39.00
24232
National Life Ins. - Ins. premium for Tom Eidem
100.00
24233
Commissioner of Revenue - Board of Assessors - 1988 license
15.00
24234
Karen Doty - Mileage
53.75
24235
Continental Safety Equip. - Fire Dept. repair kit
117.53
24236
Hoglund Bus - Parts
7.28
24237
Glass Hut - Repairs at city house on River Street
116.05
24238
GENERAL FUND a
AMOUNT
CHECK NO.
Technical Manual Prod. - Supplies for Water Dept.
5.25
24239
Automatic Systems Co. - Professional services - Water Dept.
375.80
24240
McDowall Co. - Furnace repair - City Hall
159.58
24241
Olson S Sons - Repairs in all Depts.
654.06
24242
E. H. Renner 6 Sons - Well inspection - B1 6 02
140.00
24243
Wright County Treasurer - Police contract payment
10,645.21
24244
St. Cloud Restaurant - Liners for City Hall
20.78
24245
Wheeler Consolidated - 150 poste for Park Dept.
877.50
24246
Marquette Bank Mpls. - 1974 Parking Facility bond
16,368.35
24247
Marlene Hellman - Mileage to seminar
30.50
24248
Gruys, Johnson - Computer fees for March. April b May
870.00
24249
P d H Warehouse Sales - Supplies for softball fields
385.04
24250
Criefnow Sheet Metal - Repairs for Fire b Water Depts.
1,134.00
24251
Monticello Office Products - 4 swivel chairs, etc.
881.99
24252
Minnesota Conway Fire 6 Safety - Fire Dept. boots, radio, a
c. 280.34
24253
Maus Foods - Supplies
22.11
24254
Maus Tire Service - Repairs
37.36
24255
Martie's Farm Service - Dog food
13.84
24256
American National Bank - Sewer Intcept. bond
131.35
24257
Sentry Systems - Leasing fee for Fire Dept. alarms
54.00
24258
Monticello Times - Adv.
426.88
24259
Pitney Bowes - Postage machine and scale rental
72.00
24260
Link Oil Co. - Gas - St. Dept.
22.98
24261
Al Nelson - Sub, renewal
13.72
24262
Monticello Printing - S/W postale, verified aceta., etc.
321.30
24263
Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees
527.00
24264
Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees
18.00
24265
Banker's Life Ins. - Group Ins.
4,375.13
24266
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded.
123.04
24267
ICMA Retirement Assoc. - Payroll ded.
614,34
24268
Tom Eidem - May mileage expense
300.00
24269
State Treasurer - Ins. Premiums - reimb.
27.00
24270
Moon Motors - Transfer snitch, rotary blade, etc.
356.19
24271
Decker Athletics - Pitcher's rubber - 4th St. Park
13.95
24272
Audio Communications - Repair radio in Walt's van
199.00
24273
Wahl 6 Wahl - Office supplies
53.35
24274
Unitog Rental Service - Uniform rental fee
IO2.40
24275
Unocal - Gas - Fire Dept. 5 Water Dept.
37.22
24276
Moody's Investors Service - Bond fee
1,000.00
24277
Servi-Star Hardware - Supplies
68.27
24278
Glass Hut - Replace glass on loader
97.22
24279
Ruffridge-Johnson - Tamper - Public Works Dept.
699.70
24280
Simonson Lumbar - Lumber, etc.
138.56
24281
St. Cloud Fire Equip. - Fire ext. for City Hall
325.75
24282
AMIE Ready Mix - Cement
329.28
24283
Water Products - Meters, manhole repair service
4,584.03
24284
Bowman Barnes - Misc. supplies
76.76
24265
Century Fence Co. - Posts and fence for softball fields
1,068.00
24286
Central McGowan - Oxygen
15.95
24287
Vass Electric - Bulbs
186.00
24288
Coast to Coast - Supplies for all Depts.
462.79
24289
Monticello Dep. Reg. 02 - Encoding error
190.00
24290
AT b T Information Systems - Fire phone charges
3.96
24291
Ben Franklin - Film
10.59
24292
Marco Business Products - Matte. agreement, paper, etc.
1,526.54
24293
Premier Fastener Co. - Saw blades - Mtce. Dept.
130.75
24294
Sand Plains Soil Service - Lima for softball fields
378.60
24295
L b G Rahbein, Int. - Payment 010 - Inter. sewer project
69,811.50
24296
-2-
GENERAL FUND
AMOUNT
CHECK NO.
Monticello Fire Dept. - Wages
4,396.27
24297 ,
Jerry Hermes - Library janitorial
216.67
24298 J
David Stromberg - Animal control contract
287.50
24299
Wright County State Bank - FICA 6 FWT W/H
4,915.68
24300
State Treasurer - PERA W/H
1,450.48
24301
Tom Eidem - Mileage expense to MCMA conference
143.63
24302
State Agency Revolving Fund - Social Sec. wage reports exp
35.19
24303
Petty Cash - Reimb. petty cash fund
42.87
24304
VOID
-0-
24305
Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees
456.00
24306
Melchert/ Block Assoc. - Chelsea Road project -
1,138.96
24307
Sears - Refrigerator 6 Filter - Mtce. Bldg.
317.65
24308
Biff's, Inc. - Latrine rental - Softball fields
129.00
24309
Humane Society of Wright County - Animal control fees
75.00
24310
Rick Wolfsteller - Mileage b expense
60.25
24311
Marco Business Prod. - Mtce. agreemt. on typewriter
175.00
24312
Dahlgren, Shardlow - Annexation fees through April 30
16,754.88
24313
Geyer Rental - Riding trencher rental
150.00
24314
Mobil 011 - Gas - Walt's van b Fire
43.51
24315
Phillipe 66 - Gas - Walt's van 6 Fire
35.71
24316
L 4 G Rehbein - Sod - 4th St. park
252.00
24317
Fair's Garden Center - Interceptor sewer prof. trees
2,158.98
24318
OSM - Eng. fees - Const. 5 6 Watermain on 0118 - 13,425.1,-
21,989.39
24319
Middle school - 3,246.17; Annex. - 4,417.43,
Convenience store - 200.57; Hoglund Hgts. - 700.07
Automatic Garage Door - Mtce. bldg. repairs
228.38
24320
T W Hardware - Mdse.
24.01
24321
Gary Anderson - Mileage
87.35
24322
Data Mgmt. Design - Computer equipment
1,222.00
24323
Payroll for April 30,920.58
TOTAL GENERAL DISBURSEMENTS 400,764.65
J
LIQUOR FUND
AMDUNT
CHECK
DISBURSEMENTS FOR MAY - 1987
NO.
Payroll for April
4,994.32
Traveler's Directory Service - Adv.
156.00
13044
Commissioner of Revenue - Sales tax for March
5,817.37
13045
Tel Cor America - Adv.
68.00
13046
Eagle Wine Co. - Liquor
1,908.44
13047
Quality Wine 4 Spirits - Liquor
782.14
130''3
Johnson Bros. - Liquor
1;:,^1.50
13049
Griggs, Cooper - Liquor
4,750.03
13050
Commissioner of Revenue - SWI - April
259.00
1_'-!151
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded.
170.00
13052
Wright County State Bank -FICA d FWT taxes
619.76
13053
State Treasurer - PERA W/H
181.02
13054
Johnson Bros. - Liquor
1,315.44
13055
Griggs, Couper - Liquor
1,421.17
13056
£d Phillips L Sons - Liquor
2,967.07
13057
Quality Wine 6 Spirits - Liquor
435.10
13n58
Bridgewater Telephone Co. - Telephone
64.48
13059
Northern States Power - Utilities
559.78
13060
North Central Public Service - Utilities
44.13
13061
Gruys, Johnson - Computer fees - March 6 April
330.00
13062
Grosslein Beverages - Beer
16,169.56
13063
Day Dist. Co. - Beer
1,094.05
13064
Olson 6 Sons Electric - Light bulb
5.50
13065
MN. Bar Supply Co. - Classes, can opener, etc.
192.72
13066
Rubald Beverage Co. - Wine
172.35
13067
Dick Beverage Co. - Beer
2,928.80
13068
KMOM Radio Station - Adv.
60.00
13069
Jude Candy b Tobacco - Misc. mdse.
923.13
13070
Maus Foods - Store expense
31.64
13071
Service Sales Corp. - Operating supplies
163.93
13072
Cloudy Town Dist. - Misc. mdae.
106.75
13073
Bernick's Pepsi Cola - Misc. mdse.
459.25
130?4
Stromquist Dist. - Misc. sides.
35.30
13075
Kolles Sanitation - Garbage service
133.50
13076
Coast to Coast - Store expense
13.28
13077
Dahlheimer Dist. Co. - Beer, etc.
IR,467.70
13078
Thorpe Dist. - Beer
9,059.40
13079
Monticello Office Products - Office supplies
7.50
13080
Viking Coca Cola - Misc. mdse.
308.25
13081
Seven Up Bottling - Misc. mdae.
193.20
13082
Liefert Trucking - Freight
574.80
13083
City of Monticello - 1 qtr, sewerlwater bill
59.92
13084
Griggs, Cooper - Liquor
1,996.37
13085
Foster Franzen - Premium due after audit
114.00
13086
Quality Wine 6 Spirits - Liquor
531...7
13OR7
Banker's Life - Croup ins.
321.94
13088
Wright County State Bank - FWT b FICA W/H
586.98
13089
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll dad.
170.00
13090
Griggs, Cooper - Liquor
2.284.94
13091
Eagle Wine - Liquor
1,170.08
13092
Commissioner of Revenue - Sales tax for April
6,852.12
13093
State Treasurer - PERA
175.36
13094
Quality Wine - Liquor
507.61
13095
Ed Phillipe 6 Sons - Liquor
2.321.58
13096
MN. Sheriff Assoc. - Adv.
55.00
13097
Old Dutch Foods - Misc, mdes.
165.29
13098
TOTAL LIQUOR DISBURSEMENTS
$9b.151.'i8
CITT OP WIT10E130
•
ttRlt2lIy ALS kding Dcpartmcnt Report
I
P23UOT'S and USE3
FAmth o1 -APRIL 199
PEUOTS ISSUZ311.:'C
Ha.lhT..r
11.14 Y.ai I
llrlth MARCH
ft.Lh anon+ haat Tear 70 lint:
�To Datc '
IUZI D37ITIAL
-
thaeb.r .
11
10 14
13
37
Valuation
3 304,000,00
32;159.400.00 3 340,990.00 i 1,511,250.00
5 3,222,600.00
3.647.60
15,333.57 1,948.40 8,092.15
2S,3 t0.78fe.e
I
52
1,079.70 170.45S
755.50
1,611.79
ODI" iCIAL
'
Ilusbar
2
21
.- 4
9
Yaluatlon
3,500.00
47,000.00 5.900.110 68,400.00
297,3;0.00
Feee
68.00
407.00 5470
„
468.70
2,002,40
Surcharges
2_.00
24,00 2,.95
34.20
149.40
INWSTIUAL
'
dumber
Ya7u4ti-
Fese
,
Surcharges
PWIM1110
number
6
e 5
19
26
Feee
150.00
592,00 116.00
523.00
1,090.00
3ureharges
3.00
♦,00 2.50
9.50
14.00
On1M
'
ttue0er
'f
2
V.luetioll
1,430,00
1,430.00
Fee.
14.3 .
1
Swcherg.e
.10
1.20
TOTAI. 110. PPIUil"
19
I .. 20 ._ _.... _ I1...
5
70.
TOTAL VAMATUN
107•,500.00
2.20b, 400.00 348,320.00 1,581,080.
1,519,930.00
TOTAI, FF.F7 ].R13. RQ
16.332,57 2,133.40
9,tOB.15
29,aO3.10
1074L 5UI211An1;1:1
157.50
1.107.70 176,60
800.44
1,775.18
f.VINFIIT II3CF11
.
I•F31111T IIAIVil3
HumU.r
+171'3
l'r1tHIT SVpWlA!!GG_ Valuetla'
Rnndlrr Ln
11,tn rrnr
Date
LneL You
Single Fondly
4
1 3,459.63 1 +48.75 1 297,500.01
�
20
16 '
l2lpl n,
1
t
Ilul ti -family
2
11,628.94 920.95 1,841,900.0{
3
2
co-el'eial
00
1 - -lot
0
0
Oe s: Car ague
1
29.00 1,00 2,000.0[
2
1
Signe
O
O
Publl, 0.1141.4•
0
0:
ALT31UTIfr1 OI REPAIR
,
W.1l Ing.
2
216.00 9.00 t0.000.0t
11
13
Cl-I'llof
2
407.00 24,00 47,000.0c
9
4
3nduetl'l et
0
0 '
PWtmENO
I 1
'
Alt typos
s
.592.00 4.00
20
19
ACC1990AT OTRUC7URL8
9rl.rl nq Poole
'
00
0ac3.
1• ..
0
1 '
n
Tt:1tF0RART punKIT
0
O
l
VGIOLITitw
0
I .,
Tdt'AL7
iO
10.332.57 11/07.70 2.206.f0o:i01
74
98 '
1ERM 1T
SUMBE R
87-tOfi
e7 -lou
67-1043
87-1045
67-1046
87-1047
B7 -I048
87-7049
B7-1050
87-1051
67-1052
67-7053
IDESCRIPTION
30 -Unit Apartment
24 -Unit Apartment
6 -Unit TOWntwase
Nouse s Gersge
Atrium Addition
Nouse i Carso.
I ntarior Remodel
Basement rtniah
Nousa 6 Geroge
Nouse G Garage
Nouse Add pion
Attached Garage
PL" REyiEV
67-1041 30 Unit Apartment
6T-7042 24 -Unit Apsrteent
87-1043 6 -Unit Tevnh-
87-104! Hause 6 Garage
07-1047 Nouse i Garagm
07-1050Noumm 6 Garage
.AIT 051 , Nouas A Garage
I
INDIVIDUAL PEF.MIT ACTIVITY REPGRT
MONTH OF APRIL , 198
P NAME/LOCAT SON VALUATION
MP Construction 5, Ine./700 Louring to. 5 656,400.00
Mr Construction 5, InC./714 Louring Ln. 678,200.00
My DDL Bulldors/149 Rivervlev Dr.,
units 25-30307,300.00
Sr Hakana0. BYtldofs C0/2781 Oakviev Ln 53,100.00
AC perkins. 700 ➢Ane St. 45,000.00
8r Dayle Veehoa Construction/202 Kevin
Longley Or 72,300.00
AC Lincoln Companloo/2021, West 7th 8t. 2.000.00
AD Oman- Brottmilier/1 Toirvay Dr. 31000.00
Sr Bob Wolman/1005 West River At. 98.300.00
Sr Cyr Construction. Ltd/2606 Meadow Qa. Dr. 73,900.00
AO Ravin Stumpf/618 West 6th 8t. 15,000.00
A0 Cary Watman/340 Prairie Road 2,000.00
TOTALS 62,206,400.00
mr Construction 5, Ino./700 Lour t6o Long 6 2.020.6!
4F Canstruction 51 loo./714 Our tag Long 1.673.16
mr WL 9uilders/149 Rivarvlev Dr. 25.30 887.28
Sr Hakenson Building CO/2781 Oakviow Ln 278.49
sr Dsyla Vac hes Conat/202 Kevin Langley or. 324.65
Sr Bob Wo/men/ZOOS Viet River at. 410.70
5► Cyr Construction/3606 maadov Oak to. 339.04
TOTAL PLAN RCVIEW 6
7"U RLVENUI 617.440.27
P]
1 r r ct
PERMIT ISURCHARGEIPLUMSING SUP.CHARGc
63.100.70 6 426.20 S{84.00 9 .50
2.574.10 379.10 152.00 .50
1,365.05 153.65 144.60 .50
428.45 26.55 23,00 .50
382.00 22.50
514.85 36.15 23.00 .50 ,
25.00 1.50
$4.00 1.50
631.85 49.15 27-DO
.50
521.60 36.90 26.00 .SO
162.00 7.50 13.00 .50
29.00 1.00
69.796.60 61.10 0 6592.00 54.00