Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 05-22-1989AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL Monday, May 22, 1989 - 7:30 p.m. Mayor: Ren Maus Council Members: Fran Pair, Warren Smith, Shirley Anderson, Dan Blonigen 1. Call to order. 2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held May 8, 1989. 3. Citizens comments/pet itions, requests, and complaints. 4. Public hearing on proposed improvements to Mississippi Drive. 5. Consideration of resolution ordering improvement, accepting bid, and authorizing contract - Mississippi Drive. 6. Public hearing on proposed bituminous upgrading of Oakwood Industrial Park roads. 7. Consideration of resolution ordering improvement, accepting bid, and authorizing contract - Oakwood Industrial Park. 8. Consideration of final plat approval - Country Club Court. Applicant, Floyd Markling. 9. Consideration of allowing Monticello Jaycees to use West Bridge Park for teen dance - July 1, 1989. 10. Consideration of developer agreement - Phase I - Meadows Second Addition. 11. Consideration of request to prepare plans and specifications for restroom in West Bridge Park. 12. Consideration of purchasing PAX machine. 13. Consideration of bills for the month of May. 14. Adjournment. MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, May 8, 1989 - 7:30 p.m. Members Present: Ken Maus, Fran Fair, Shirley Anderson, Warren Smith, Dan Blonigen. Members Absent: None. 2. Approval of minutes. Motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Warren Smith, and unanimously carried, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held April 24, 1989. 3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests and complaints. None forthcoming. 4. Public hearing on the re -assessment of the 81-1 Improvement Project - Edgar Klucas and Dan Frie. City Administrator Wolfsteller outlined potential methods that could be employed to establish an assessment amount for this project that was completed in 1981. Wolfsteller reviewed three options which included 1) assessing the cost based on the original project cost, 2) assessing cost based on the present cost to complete the same improvement, and �. 3) assess an amount equal to the original cost plus the 13 percent interest rate that would have accumulated for the 7-1/2 years since the project was completed. In his summary, Wolfsteller reminded Council that the assessment amount must not exceed the benefit created by the improvements to the property. 1' After discussion, it was the general consensus of Council to hire an appraiser to evaluate the degree of benefit afforded to the subject properties as a result of the installation of public utilities. Jim Metcalf, representing Edgar Klucas, submitted a letter to the City which outlined formal written objection to the amount of the proposed assessment. He went on to note that the City had conducted an assessment hearing when the project was completed. His client would have had at that time the opportunity to respond to the proposal to charge interest on unpaid assessment amounts. It was Metcalf's assertion that it would not be proper for the City to charge interest on unpaid cost accumulating since 1981, as the property owner in 1981 was not given the opportunity to pay the assessment at the time that the project was completed, nor was he given the opportunity to object to the assessment. After discussion, motion was made by Pran Fair to order an appraisal of properties benefited by Project 81-1 and continue the public hearing until the City Council meeting scheduled for June 12, 1989. Motion was seconded by Warren Smith and carried unanimously. 0 Council Minutes - 5/8/89 5. Consider a rezoning request to rezone residential unplatted property from R-3 (medium density residential) to PZM (per:OCmance zone mixed). Applicant, J & K Properties. At this point in the meeting, Ken Maus relinquished his position as Mayor and passed the gavel to Fran Fair. Maus then abstained from commenting on this particular issue as the Mayor/Councilmember. Assistant Administrator O'Neill reviewed the proposal to rezone an area approximately equal in size to one block located directly east of the Maus Foods store from R-3 to PZM zoning. O'Neill indicated to Council that the proposal to rezone this property from R-3 to PZM provides the landowner with flexibility in developing this area as either residential usage or commercial retail usage. He went on to note that the purpose of the PZM or performance zoning district is to allow for development flexibility and special design control within sensitive areas of the city due to environmental or physical limitations. The performance zoning district also attempts to create a reasonable balance between the interest of the property owner in freely developing his property and at the same time protect the interest of surrounding properties. Fran Fair asked if this rezoning request would create more land available for multi -family housing developments. Gary Anderson responded by saying that the present zoning already allows multi -family development to occur, whereas, the proposed PZM zone wntld orovir)o the cPnnrt._nity .cr ta,: establishment as well as multi -family development. Therefore, this rezoning actually decreases the possibility of development of multi -family housing in this area. After discussion, motion was made by Dan Blonigen to approve the proposed rezoning of subject parcel from R-3 to PZM zoning, with the motion to approve being based on the finding that the proposal is 1) consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, 2) compatible with geographic area and character of adjoining land, 3) the rezoning will not tend to depreciate the area in which it is proposed, and 4) the need for the proposed rezoning has been sufficiently demonstrated. Motion was seconded by Shirley Anderson and carried unanimously. 6. Consideration of a preliminary plat request for a proposed new residential subdivision plat. Applicant, West Praiirie Partners. Assistant Administrator O'Neill reviewed the proposed preliminary plat and went on to inform Council that the Planning Commission had recommended approval of this plat based on the understanding that the plat met all requirements of the City Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. A problem was discovered with this plat when Council was informed that one of the lot's front footage at the setback line is insufficient relative to the City Ordinance. It was noted that Lot 5 possesses a lot width of 32 feet at the building setback line, which is less than the 56 -foot minimum required by ordinance. Staff apologized for the late notice of this particular problem. At this point, Council reviewed 7 y. Council Minutes - 5/8/89 the inconsistency between the plat and the Zoning Ordinance and determined that in this case a variance would be appropriate, as the City has allowed shorter property width in circumstances where there is a limited development area to work with. Requiring the 56 -foot property width at setback line would reduce the number of lots that could be created from seven to six. It was the view of the Council that the impact of requiring adherence to this section of the ordinance in this case would represent an unreasonable restriction on the use of the land and that a variance would be appropriate in this case. After discussion, motion was made by Dan Blonigen, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to approve the preliminary plat of Prairie West. Motion passed unanimously. In another matter relating to this development, the developers requested that the City allow the City Engineer to prepare plans and specifications for this development with payment being made directly to the City Engineer from the developers. This practice would allow the developers to save the cost of two engineering firms preparing and reviewing plans and specifications for the necessary public improvements associated with Prai:ie West. After discussion, motion was made by Dan Blonigen, seconded by Warren Smith, to grant permission to OSM to work for the developers of Prairie West. motion raszed--,nani!"us J. y� 7. Consideration of approving declaration of protective covenants and restrictions of the Evergreens. Assistant Administrator O'Neill reviewed those items within the protective covenants of the Evergreens that are not otherwise covered by City Ordinances. Those restrictions include 1) the covenants limit the number of cars on each property to four, 2) all lots abutting the mobile home park shall have attached garages, 3) no earth homes shall be permitted, 4) all houses shall have attached or detached garages shingled and sided the same as the house, 5) exterior colors of homes shall be limited to pastels and earth tones, 6) lawn establishment required within one year of occupancy, and 7) no motor vehicles shall be kept or stored upon the premises except those that are being driven and currently licensed or registered. A discussion then ensued regarding the enforceability of the protective covenants. It was Dan Blonigen's concern that the City will be saddled with enforcing these covenants. Blonigen noted that the covenants should be consistent with City Ordinances and that the rules that apply to new developments should apply to the entire city. Brad Larson, representing Kent Kjollberg, informed Council that the presence of the protective covenants can act as a marketing tool and can provide the homeowner with assurances that, if necessary, he can take civil action against individuals within the development that are not in z Council Minutes - 5/8/89 compliance with the covenants. He went on to note that the City can more effectively assure compliance with the restrictions listed if such restrictions are incorporated into the City Ordinances. Fran Fair indicated support for establishing ordinance amendments that would address some of the problems that the restrictive covenants attempt to address. However, in lieu of those ordinances at this time, it was her view that it is appropriate to approve the suggested restrictive covenants. After discussion, nation by Fran Fair, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to approve the declaration of protective covenants and restrictions of the Evergreens. Motion carried unanimously. Councilmember Anderson requested that staff make sure that the covenants are properly recorded prior to sale of any of the lots associated with phase I of the Evergreens. It was noted by staff that it is the responsibility of the developer to record the covenants and that staff will certainly make sure that this is done. In addition, the City has in its possession an executed copy of the covenants; and if the developer does not record the document, the City can act to do so. Consideration of adopting Evergreens Development Agreement. T,cci- - -atcr G`i:eiii biiafly reviewed rile developer agreement and informed Council that Kent Kjellberg is selling the Evergreens development to Wally Anderson of ARADCO. O'Neill went on to review the background of the developer and informed Council that Anderson has completed several successful developments in the metropolitan area. John Badalich also noted that Wally Anderson is a reputable developer that his company has worked with on numerous occasions. Staff recommended adoption of the development agreement, as the agreement provides the City with protection against some of the problems recently experienced with other developments completed by private developers. Fran Fair reviewed the resume of Wally Anderson and noted her support of the development agreement, especially in light of the positive track record of the buyer of the development. After discussion, motion was made by warren Smith, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to adopt the Evergreens Development Agreement. Motion carried unanimously. 9. Consideration of final plat approval of phase I of the Evergreens subdivision. Applicant, Kent Kjeiloerg. Assistant Administrator O'Neill informed Council that the final plat is ready for approval subject to successful completion of the environnantai assessment worksheet review process and subject to minor modifications of the easement lines pending completion of pians and specifications for the public improvements necessary with phase I. 1 9 Council Minutes - 5/8/89 After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Fran Fair, to approve the final plat of phase I of the Evergreens subdivision subject to successful completion of environmental assessment worksheet review process and subject to necessary modifications of easement lines associated with preparation of final plans for phase I public improvements. Motion carried unanimously. 10. Consideration of rezoning agricultural land to residential and commercial usage - Evergreens development. Assistant Administrator reported that as part of the final approval process of this subdivision, the land subdivided must be rezoned from the present agricultural classification to a combination of residential and/or business zoning classifications. Planning Commission recommended that the entire residential area encompassed by the Evergreens be rezoned from agricultural status to R-1. He went on to inform Council that Planning Commission had also called for rezoning outlots A and B from agricultural to 8-3 zoning. It was O'Neill's concern that the decision to rezone Outlots A and B,from agricultural to business highway rezoning might not be appropriate given language contained in the Comprehensive Plan. O'Neill then suggested that Council table this matter, as this particular rezoning request is not critical to the successful development of the Evergreens subdivision. After discussion, motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Shirley { Anderson, to approve the rezoning of the area encompassed by phases I-V 1. of the Evergreens subdivision. Motion carried unanimously. Motion made by Fran Fair, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to table rezoning of Outlets A and 8 pending further review by the Planning Commission. Motion carried unanimously. 11. consideration of ordering publication of notice of environmental assessment worksheet comment period. Motion made by warren Smith, seconded by Dan Dlonigen, to order publication of notice of environmental assessment worksheet comment period for the Evergreens development and declare Monticello as the responsible governmental unit. Motion carried unanimously. 12. Consideration of adoptin Kjellberg Mobile Home Park East Development Agreement and conaideration of approving expanaion or the K7ellberq East Mobile Home Park. O'Neill informed Council that the Kjellberg Eaot Mobile Home Park Development Agreement and the Evergreens Development Agreement are connected and that it is appropriate at this time to adopt the mobile . home park development agreement, as Council has adopted the Evergreens Development Agreement. 5 Council Minutes — 5/8/89 John Simla noted a problem in Article Three of the Mobile Rome Park Developer Agreement which states that the east park sewer access charge and water access charge shall be $225 per mobile home pad. Simola noted that the access charge should include only the charge for sewer service and that the proposal to include water in this access charge is not appropriate. Brad Larson indicated that he would amend the language of the developer agreement to include a requirement that Rjellberg will pay the then prevailing fee for access to the city water system at such time that the developer desires access to city water. O'Neill also informed Council that Mr. Kjellberg requests permission to expand the mobile home park, as plans are in place for extension of the lateral connection from the southerly most point of phase I to the mobile home park. O'Neill noted that it would be premature to allow expansion of the park based on plans only and that expansion would only be appropriate when the actual connection to the city system is in place. Furthermore, the City has received no approvals from the PCA stating that the existing treatment system is adequate to handle additional sewage. Therefore, staff recommends that the expansion of the mobile home park not be allowed until the proper approvals are gained from the Pollution Control Agency or until such time that the park is actually hooked into city services. Motion made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Dan Blonigen, to adopt Kjellberg's Mobile Home Park East Developer Agreement and deny plans to expand Mobile Home Park East. Council to consider allowing expansion when appropriate approvals are in place. Motion carried unanimously. 13. Review and discuss plan of action designed to address concerns of Meadow Oak resicents. Assistant Administrator O'Neill informed Council that City staff, along with Ren Maus, met with Dickman Knutson and his son to discuss problems highlighted by Meadow Oak residents. O'Neill outlined the general plan of action developed at the meeting in response to the problems submitted by Meadow Oak area residents. Council was informed that Mr. Knutson has agreed to record the covenants against the 35 or so remaining lots in the development area and that the covenants may be slightly modified to incorporate restrictions that the City Council requested but were never incorporated into the latest unrecorded version of the covenants. Finally, he informed council that a meeting has been planned for Wednesday, May 17, at 6:30 p.m., at which time area residents of Meadow Oaks will be invited to discuss the covenants and other public nuisance related problems with City staff and Dickman Knutson. Fran Fair suggested that rewriting the covenants may be the wrong approach to resolving the problems in the area and that the City might be better off establishing ordinances in lieu of protective covenants. Rhonda Thielen and her husband, Bruce, asked who is going to pay to record the covenants that should have been recorded in the first place. Mayor Maus indicated that this is an issue that could be addressed at the meeting with Dickman Knutson scheduled for the 17th of May. 0 Council Minutes - 5/8/89 Rhonda Thielen indicated to Council that she does not have a problem with the small recreation vehicles and boats parked in front lawns. However, she feels strongly that an ordinance amendment is necessary that would limit the size of recreation vehicles being parked in driveways. It was her view that the RV's represent a safety hazard for individuals attempting to back out of driveways adjacent to driveways that contain large recreation vehicles that obstruct site lines. It was the general consensus of Council that Council will review potential ordinance amendments after the meeting of Friday, May 19, with Meadow Oak area residents. A special workshop was established for May 19 at 1:00 p.m. at which time Council will discuss potential d3veiopment of public nuisance related ordinances. 14. Consideration of approval of contract with Polka Dot Recycling for curb -side recycling in the city of Monticello. Motion by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Warren Smith, to approve the contract for Polka Dot Recycling for the initial period of 36 months. Motion carried unanimously. 15. Consideration of change order 42 for Project 88-01C, Pumphouse $3. John Simola informed Council that on July 25, 1988, upon reviewing the plans for purphouse 13, MinneSota Depart: nt Of ;realth reyueslc-J specific changes in the design of the building and equipment. On September 14, 1988, OSM drafted a letter to Richmar Construction, Inc., requesting proposals for a change order, including the work outlined by the Minnesota Department of Health. Richmar Construction responded on September 30, 1988, with a proposal for five changes and a more economical type of fan for the chlorine room. The net effect of all the changes is a credit of $ill for these items. After discussion, a motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to approve change order M2 for a credit of $111. Motion carried unanimously. 16. Consideration of Council support requesting the Department of Revenue hold a public hearing on 8 Troposed rule Change concerning valuation and asaessilents or electric utl Sty companies. City Administrator Wolfsteller informed Council that he is aware of a Department of Revenue proposed rule adoption that will affect the valuation and assessment of electric, gas distribution, and pipeline companies, including the NSP plant in Monticello. He noted that although none of the governing bodies such as school districts, local government units, or county governments, were notified by the Department of Revenue of this proposed change in their rules, these modifications proposed by the Department of Revenue could affect the valuation of the power plants and resulting tax revenues from them. The proposed rules would automatically go into effect without a public hearing unless at least 25 q people submit a written request for a public hearing. Wolfsteller J. Council Minutes - 5/8/89 recommended that Council request the Department of Revenue hold a public hearing; and once it's determined what effect this rule change would have, the Council may want to consider even appropriating some funds for supporting a lobbyist to fight any change that would materially affect Monticello's tax base. After discussion, motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by Fran Fair, to request that the Department of Revenue hold a public hearing on any rule change that would affect the valuation and assessment of NSP and authorize the Mayor and the City Administrator to request the same i -n writing. Motion carried unanimously. 17. Consideration of one -day gambling license application - Monticello Lions Club - July 2 celebration. Motion by Dan Blonigen, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to grant a one -day gambling license application to Monticello Lions Club for the July 2 celebration. Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Warren Smith, to allow the Lions Club exclusive use of Ellison Park on July 2, 1989. Motion carried unanimously. 18. Consideration of authorizing purchase of replacement motive water pump for equalization basin. Public Works Director Simola informed Council that the motive water pump in the EQ basin mixes the waste water in the tank to get a homogenous mass in the case of pR and high BOD loads, as well as assisting in odor control in some aspects. Normally, the EQ basin is not used 100 percent of the time, and the pump should last a long time. When the City operated the plant, however, our operators used the EO basin as an activated sludge aeration tank, and the pump was used extensively. This may have caused is premature failure. Simola recommended that Council authorize replacement of the motive water pump at a cost of $2,534. Motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Dan Blonigen, to authori2e replacement of the motive water pump from waldor Pump of Minneapolis for a cost of $2,534. Motion carried unanimously. 19. Consideration of awarding Protect 89-1 to Channel Construction for the improvement of Marvin Elwood Road extension and discussion of potential assessment method. Administrator Wolfstelier informed Council that the 89-1 Project involves development of an extension of Marvin Elwood Road on a corner property and that it has been City policy in the past to assess property owners of corner lots only the cost of development of roadway on one side of the property. In this situation, if the property owners are assessed the full cost of this particular roadway, the cost to develop the roadway would outweigh the benefit to the property; and therefore, the roadway might not be constructed. council may wish to consider paying a portion 0 Council Minutes - 5/8/89 of the assessment cost, as the extension of the roadway does benefit the area residents in the development and the extension does provide for easier and more efficient snow removal in the area. Motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by Fran Fair, and carried unanimously to contribute toward the cost to development of the extension of Marvin Elwood Road and to limit the financial exposure of the developer of phase I of the Meadows Second Addition to $8,500. 20. Consideration of adopting Meadows and Meadows Second Addition Developer Agreement. Assistant Administrator O'Neill informed Council that the final draft of the developer agreement was not available at this time, and the developer and City staff request that Council table this matter until the next regularly scheduled meeting. Motion made by Warren Smith, seconded by Fran Fair, to table adoption of Meadows and Meadows Second Addition Developer Agreement pending further Council review at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Monticello City Council. Motion carried unanimously. 21. Consideration of granting final plat approval - Meadows Second Addition. Applicant, value Plus Homes. Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that the developer had made the adjustments to the preliminary plat as requested by Council and that the final plat is ready for Council approval. Motion was made by warren Smith, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to grant final approval of the final plat of the Meadows Second Addition. Motion carried unanimously. 22. Public Hearing - Consideration of vacating streets and utility and drainage easements. O'Neill informed Council that upon acceptance of the final plat, Council needs to vacate the streets and utility and drainage easements associates with the original plat of the Meadows. Motion wan made by warren Smith, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to vacate streets and utility and drainage easements associated with the original plat of the Meadows. Motion carried unanimously. 23. Consideration of townhouse association to own and maintain sanitary sewer main. Cary Anderson reported to Council that staff recommends extension of the existing sanitary sewer main to the northerly portion of the lot containing the Fairway Court Townhouse units. Extension of this main will allow the developer to avoid a spaghetti -like maze of water and 0 Council Minutes - 5/8/89 sewer utilities running to each of the townhouse units. It is proposed that the extension include the sewer main only and would not include extension of the water main. The water lines would include six individual water lines run to each of the six townhouse units. Under this scenerio, the Townhouse Association would be responsible for maintaining the sanitary sewer main placed on the property. Dan Konigen requested that the Townhouse Association ownership of the water main be recorded on the deed to protect the City against potential responsibilities associated with the sewer main on townhouse property. After discussion, motion was made by Dan Blonigen, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to approve Townhouse Association ownership and maintenance of a sanitary sewer main with the stipulation that the Association will record responsibilities associated with this main on individual deeds. Motion carried unanimously. 24. Other Matters. Rick wolfsteller reviewed his efforts to get the most mileage possible out of the existing copier systems. He went on to review the continuing problems that staff has had with the existing machines and recommended that Council allocate a minimum of $8,500 to purchase new equipment. After discussion, motion by Fran Fair, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to authnrizn riry staff to roirchase a copy machine with c patil'tiec sufficient to handle City needs. Mayor Maus is asked to review purchase prior to finalization. Motion carried unanimously. Jeff O'Neill Assistant Administrator I 10 O y Council Agenda - 5/2/89 4. Public hearing on proposed improvements on Mississippi Drive. AND Consideration of resolution ordering improvement, accepting bid, and authorizing contract - Mississippi Drive. W .S.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: This project consists of approximately 2,000 lineal feet of street reconstruction on Mississippi Drive. The first 100 feet of the project is being constructed along with the County Road 39 project. The next approximately 800 feet of street will receive minor patching, subgrade correction, and an overlay with the possibility of 200 feet of drain tile. The lower 1,140 feet of Mississippi Drive will receive major reconstruction. The entire blacktop surface and base materials will be removed along with some reworking of the subgrade. Drain tile is expected to be installed along the southern edge; and the new street will consist of geotextile filter fabric with 10 inches of class V and 3-1/2 inches of blacktop. In addition, approximately 200 feet of curbing will be replaced in areas where settlement has occurred. On the project there is approximately 3,775 lineal feet of assessable property. This varies slightly as to how we treat the cul-de-sac area on the west end and 'now we treat the side yards on the edat end. 3uhn Badalich has estimated the total cost of the project to be in the jU neighborhood of $133,240, including all engineering inspections, bond 5 � I fees, etc. This would give us a front footage assessment of $35.30 per vQ �%} foot, or about $3,530 per 100 foot lot. The actual bids are due in Monday, the 22nd, and we will present the actual low bidder information at the meeting. As we have discussed previously, there is certainly rationale in this case to assess only 50 percent of the cost of this project, as the street is being replaced prior to living a useful life. Thin is in accordance with policies set forth in the City Ordinance. There is, however, additional rationale in this case that the assessment be less than 50 percent, as the street really never served a useful life more than a few years, and from a public works standpoint, there is rationale that the City assess someplace between 20 percent and 50 percent, or say 35 percent. This would make the front footage cost $12.36, or an assessment for a 100 -foot lot would be $1,236. ,y B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: ~-- 1. The first alternative would be to close the public hearing, indicate an assessment rate of 35 percent, and to pass a resolution ordering the improvement. 2. The second alternative would be to close the public hearing, indicate an assessment of 50 percent, and pass a resolution ordering the improvement. 1,i r, u MC 14 Council Agenda - 5/22/89 3. The third alternative could be to give an indication that the City may assess at a higher rate than 50 percent. This would not be in accordance with the assessment policy established by the City, and most residents may not be in favor of such a project. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As Public works Director, I favor alternative $1. However, I feel that the project is quite costly and will withhold my recommendation until after the bids are opened and more costs are determined. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Resolution for adoption will be available Monday after bids are opened; Refer to feasibility study for the project submitted with a previous Council agenda. az RESOLUTION 89 - RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT, ACCEPTING BID, AND AUTHORIZING CONTRACT WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 24th day of April, 1989, fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed improvement of Mississippi Drive between East County Road 39 and its termination point. WHEREAS, 10 days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon the 22nd day of March, 1989, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon, WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvement of Mississippi Drive, bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Project 89-02 Project 89-03 Grand Mississippi Dr Oakwood Ind. Park Total Buffalo Bituminous $87,409.65 $99,303.43 $186,713.08 Mid -Minnesota Hot Mix, Inc. $81,605.00 $139,778.00 $221,383.00 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Buffalo Bituminous is the lowest responsible bidder jointly for both projects. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: 1. The 89-02 improvement is hereby ordered as proposed. 2. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached contract. with Buffalo Bituminous in the name of the City of Monticello for the improvements to Mississippi Drive according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Administrator. 3. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposit made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the City council this 22nd day of May, 1989. City Admir.iatrator I Mayor Council Agenda - 5/22/09 Public Hearing on proposed bituminous upgrading of Oakwood Industrial Park roads. AND Consideration of resolution ordering improvement, accepting bid, and authorizing contract - Oakwood Industrial Park. W.S.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: This project consists of overlaying Thomas Park Drive, Chelsea Road (between Oakwood Drive and Fallon), and Dundas Road (between Oakwood Drive and Fallon). Subgrade correction is limited to a small portion on Dundas and a small portion on Thomas Park Drive. After removing the fabric from underneath the overlay area and deleting Fallon Avenue, the engineer's estimate for the project is $195,610, including construction, engineering, inspection, legal, and administrative fees. There is approximately 7,545 lineal feet of overlay work. Of this, there are 1ti r G'1 approximately 12,500 assessable front feet, depending upon the method of assessment chosen. This works out to $15.65 per front foot based upon $ 1 the engineer's estimate. This would be $4,695 for a 300 -foot lot. The proposed assessment rate is a little different in this area than Mississippi Drive. In the Oakwood Industrial Park, the original plan was to two-phase the streets, phase I for the 7 -ton design, phase II for the 9 -ton design. In the late 701s, the City realized that a nine -ton design was ultimately needed out felt it wuuld be beitet to lave sura development occur in the park prior to the burdening the owners with the additional cost for the nine -ton street. Some development has occurred, and a limited amount of heavy truck traffic is using the industrial park. The streets in the industrial park are in the 12th year of their 20 -year design life and have shown some wear and tear along with extensive rutting as is indicated by the Braun Engineering report. There may not be a better time than now to do the proposed upgrading for the following reasons: 1) The City expects the bids to be very attractive due to the large volume of other work in our area thio year. This could result in a 10-25 percent savings, depending upon the actual bids. 2) Cost of oil and construction are escalating each year. 3) The streets are currently in their 12th year of a 20 -year design life. The last eight years will see a much more rapid deterioration of the street system in the industrial park. If we wait more than two or three years to do this improvement, the existing street surfaces may not be suitable for overlay and would have to be removed in their entirety. This alone could double the cost of the job In the later years of the life cycle of the pavement. For some time, the Industrial Development Committee has felt that they 1 were at a disadvantage trying to sell an industrial park whooe roads were not up to the industry standards. Although I believe they were not -3- Council Agenda - 5/22/89 advertising the fact that the roads were substandard for an industrial park, when it came time to answer the question with prospective clients, it was not an easy item for them to address. It is my understanding that 011ie will be getting some additional input from this group prior to Monday evening's meeting. Since the overlay at this time is phase II of the original project, there is rationale that 100 percent of the cost should be charged to the adjoining property. There is also some rationale that phase II, or the nine or ten ton roads, is not needed in this area, as the traffic levels are moderate at best, and strict enforcement of the load limits in the spring would not essentially put anyone out of business who is currently operating in the park. Therefore, there is some indication that if the City wishes to have nine or ten ton roads, they should be willing to pay a portion of the cost. The bids for the project will be in on Monday, and we will have additional information for the Council concerning the actual costs. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative would be to, at the close of the public hearing, review the bids and pass a resolution ordering the improvement project indicating an assessment rate of 100 percent to benefiting property owners. 2. The second alternative would be to, at the close of the public hearing, review the bids and order the proposed improvement at less than 100 percent as determined by the City Council. 3. The third alternative would be, at the close of the public hearing, to not order the improvement but to put it on hold for a year or two or revive it at such time there is more interest in the project or it to needed for a single development or industrial complex. C. b"1ANP RECOMMENDATION: As Public Works Director, it seems most appropriate to overlay these streets within the next couple of years before significant deterioration sets in prohibiting overlays. It is easy to see, however, that thio may be a burden for existing undeveloped properties in the industrial park. What those individuals may not realize, however, is that complete replacement of this roadway system in the future could be a greater burden. It is hoped that the bids will come in more attractive than the engineer's estimate and make this project more appealing to the existing property owners in the industrial park. If not, and the project temporarily falls through, I would recommend that it be reviewed annually and that the project go ahead prior to further detertoriation. This could be within the next two years and at a significantly higher cost than today. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Resolution for adoption will be available Monday after bids are opened Please refer to the information presented with a previous agenda supplement. -4- A Council Agenda - 5/22/89 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Consideration of resolution ordering improvement, accepting bid, and authorizing contract - Oakwood Industrial Park. (O.K.) The Industrial Development Committee earmarked the potential need to upgrade the industrial park roads as a result of the roads being posted at 7 -ton axle limit in the spring. It becomes difficult to market industrial land to potential industries who assume the industrial roads meet standard city, county, or state requirements and thereafter find out differently (avoids unnecessary surprises and embarrassment). Many of our current businesses in the industrial park purchased their property when the axle ton limits were 7 -ton, or purchased their property thereafter with the assumption that the roads met the standard requirements, and pay property taxes based on industrial/commercial tax classification percentages. The IDC understands the dilemma of the current property owners, however, it also sees the potential cost effectiveness of upgrading the park roads prior to further deterioration and to avoid potential future construction cost increases. The IDC encourages the City Council to consider upgrading the Oakwood Industrial Park roads to 10 -ton all weather roads because 1) of the potential cost effectiveness, 2) to increase the market strategy of the industrial land; 3) avoid future unnecessary surprises and embarrassment; and 5) to consider the increased traffic on Chelsea Riad with the completed extension to County Road 118. In reality of today's requirements of the industrial park roads are of residential design, not of industrial design. -48- orr n schekn 2011 Ea [ I lennepm Avenue Mmncapiills, MN 55413 b 12331-8650 FAX 3313806 Cng1n to S.—ynn Planners May 22, 1989 City of Monticello 250 East Broadway Monticello, MN 55362 Attn: Honorable Mayor and Council Members RE: Road Improvements and Appurtenant Work Project Nos. 89-02 and 89-03 OSM Comm. Nos. 2621 and 4374 Dear Mayor and Council Members: This morning at 11:00 a.m., two bids were received and opened for the referenced projects. The bids received for both projects totaled $186,713.08 and $221,383.00. The engineer's estimate was $257,946. The low bid is within the project budget and appears responsive. Both bids were checked by OSM. A certified copy of the bid tabulation is enclosed for your information. We recommend award of the total base bid in the amount of $186,713.08, consisting of Project No. 89.02, Mississippi Drive in the amount of $87,409.65 and Project 89- 03, Oakwood Industrial Park Road in the amount of $99,303.43 to Buffalo Bituminous, Inc., Box 357, Buffalo, MN 55131, being the lowest responsvie bidder for the combined projects. Sincerely, ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON %ASSOCIA,JES,INC.^ JA I John P((.BBadal ich, P.E. /City Engineer /lmt Enclosure cc: Buffalo Bituminous, Inc. E.H. Anderson, P.E. I gWl(In% hlunny l mr%,rl C-01 7ARU.ATION OF BIDS ROAD IIOR00FJ'EfT A40 APMTEMNT WOW MISSISSIPPI DRIVE ROAD and MALE tMOUSTRIAL PARK 1MPRO417EMTS PROJECT NO. 89.01 AND 89-03 f Ne C11. OF "OtITICSLIA. 4 IRT COAITY. MINNESOTA RIDS OPENED : MAY 27. 1989 at 11:00.4.14. TOTAL St74 M A .......................................................1 3021915.80 SCNEOUE B - OA1,'DkF, IMUSTRIAL PARK ROAD IrPROVEMENT • P%F..CT NO. 89-03 F!OINEERS ESTI"ATF, FTJFFAI.O PITIJMING(TS.INC. MIO-M:N4ESOTA ROT MIX SEC L.S. 2.962.00 7.967.00 07021 CLEAN IMP 1 L.S. INC . 2,0~2.00 NO. ITFM DISCRIPTION "4TITV __��_��_� OMIT WT PRIrF TOTAL PR1Cr 19NIT PRICE T(1TAI. PRICE UNIT PRIrJE TOM. PRICE. •--__•�--�_��__ .tee=aaee=a_-= 9XDA E A - M1551SSIP1 DRIVE MAD - PROF.CT NO. __��-__----'----'=-:a:=e 80-02 02111 Ar4RFGATF LASS 5 (SOP"IND 6 BASF,) IBM TON =_ 10,300.00 =e_�-= 100 02021 MPII.I7ATIDN I L.S. 1.979.15 1.979.15 1.00 I.m 500.0 100,00 0:021 CLEAN LIP I L.S. 1.979,15 1.979.15 1.00 1.00 2.000.00 2,(100,00 02104 RFW. CURB AND WITEe %10 L. F. 2.00 600.00 2.00 600.00 3.00 900,00 02104 REMOVE BiTIYIIKnJS Sffkc- ( M. SAW) 4100 S. Y. 4.0 M7.:NOO.nO 1.00 4.IA0.00 0.90 3.600.00 02105 COMMON EXCAVATION Ii00 C.Y. 2.00 .1.:00.00 ?.25 5.:00.00 3.01 4.800.00 O -"II ACOFGATCftASS 5 (SHMLOER:40 6 BASEI :6r0 TOM 6.00 15. AM, 00 4.50 11,701.On 4.50 111700.011 Orr MILL 81TUM TNOUS SLIRFACE 4"0 S. Y. 3.00 1.590.0 ?.00 I.nAO.M 1.50 795,0 02331 RITTF.INOUS RASE (INCL. BIT. MATEQIALI 550 TOM 22.00 17.10.0 19.10 10.725,0 74.00 13,200.OD 02141 BITUMINOUS HEAR MOO. (I'NCI., BIT. M4TWAL) t.SA TOM 25.0 1k.?50.00 !9.50 M21h75.on ?4.00 16.250.00 02357 BiT'JAIM PATFR14L FOR TACK COAT 3311 GAL. 1.00 ~37.00 I.nO 330.00 I.On 334,00 02411 SLIRMDIWTABI.E CONCRETE CLIRB AND GIM 10n 1 F. 8.0 ?.40.0 •6.0 t•E00.0 in -An 3.00,0 02506 AT)JIST MAWXES 3 EACH 140.00 450.00 150.00 450.00 150.0 450.00 02574 SM INCL. 4' BLACK DIRT _000 S.Y. O!.Oo 2.00 41000.00 2.50 5.000.00 07621 TRENCH DRAIN W/8• PERF. PIPE, ROCK 6 FABRIC 1?40 L. F. :0.00 261900.00 18.25 :41455.00 5.50 7,370.00 1 02671 STANDARD STORM SFWFR MAN+01.E % EAfTN 1.000.00 6,OnD.00 IOOO.M 6.000.00 1.000.0 61000.(4) 02511 4* R.C.P. CLASS 11 35 L.F 35. GO 1.225.M 30.00 1.040.(0 72.00 1.120.00 S" HOTEKTLE FILTER FABRIC 4340 S.Y. 0.74 3.261.50 1.00 4.350.(81 STD STREET SWEEPING 0,15 PRE 750.00 II2.50 1.0 0.15 1.000.00 150,00 TOTAL St74 M A .......................................................1 3021915.80 SCNEOUE B - OA1,'DkF, IMUSTRIAL PARK ROAD IrPROVEMENT • P%F..CT NO. 89-03 02021 MOBILIZATTOM 1 L.S. 2.962.00 7.967.00 07021 CLEAN IMP 1 L.S. 2,962.00 2,0~2.00 07104 REMOVE BITI.MIhW SURFACE (INCL. SAW) 1150 S. Y. 4.00 4.601.00 02111 Ar4RFGATF LASS 5 (SOP"IND 6 BASF,) IBM TON 6. On 10,300.00 02232 MILL BITUMINOUS SIFFACE 100 S. V. 3.00 3OO.M 02731 BITUMINOUS BASF. (IMCL. BIT. MATFRIALI 150 TON ?2.00 5.300.00 02341 PITUMINCJ3 WA (INR;. BIT. MATERIA 4000 Tom 24.00 961000.00 02341 BITUMINOUS WEAR 10. (10.. BIT. MATF,RIALI 400 TON ^4.0 221400.(10 02357 BITUMINOIIB MATERIAL FOR TACK )DAT 13M GALLON 1.00 1.800.00 07506 AO,UST MOWS 21 FACT 150.00 31150.00 02506 ADJUST GATE VALVES 31 EACH 10.0 3.300.00 STB GTREET SYEEPIND 1.43 MILE 750.00 1.072.50 TOTAL SCHEDULE B ...................................................... d 154.946, 44 GRAND TOTAL BASE BID (Sl7EDLLF9 •A• AFD'B')...........................1 757.862.10 �, ronotes Corrected Figure Nee i of 1 2621.20 1 4314.00 uuumsa pauamu 1 07,4097 1 81. W51m 1.00 1,00 500.00 500.00 1.0 1.00 3, 00.00 3.000.00 2.00 %3nO.0 0.90 1.035.00 4.50 8.100.00 4.5A 81100.00 2.01 200.0 2.00 700.00 16.00 4.000.00 24.00 6.000.00 16.00 64.00.00 73.00 92.Om. On 16.0 14.400.0 24.0 21,60.0 0.39) 9M.00 1.110 11800.00 100.00 2,100.00 100.00 2.100.0 100.0 3,300.00 100.00 3,300.00 1.01 1.43 inO.On 143.0 1 99.31.43 1 139.778.00 1 186,713.011 1 921.383.00 1 hereby certify that this i9 4 true and carrert tabulation of the lids 4a received on I Mar 72, 1989 MAn �. Gdslich,P.E. RESOLUTION 89 - RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT, ACCEPTING BID, AND AUTHORIZING CONTRACT WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 24th of April, 1989, fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed improvements of Thomas Park Drive, Chelsea Road (from Oakwood Drive to Fallon Avenue), and Dundas Road (from Oakwood Drive to Fallon Avenue), with bituminous overlay to increase load carrying capacity, WHEREAS, 10 days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon the 22nd day of May, 1989, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon, WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvement of Thomas Park Drive, Chelsea Road, and Dundas Road with bituminous overlay, bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Project 89-02 Project 89-03 Grand Mississippi Or Oakwood Ind. Park Total Buffalo Bituminous $87,409.65 $99,303.43 $186,713.08 Mid -Minnesota Hot Mix, Inc. $81,605.00 $139,778.00 $221,383.00 ANT) WHEREA.^,, it nnpeArs that Buffalo Bitumincuz is the lowest resp,nsible bidder jointly for both projects. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: 1. The 89-03 improvement is hereby ordered as proposed. 2. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached contract with Buffalo Bituminous in the name of the City of Monticello for the improvements to Thomas Park Drive, Chelsea Road, and Dundae Road according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of City Administrator. 3. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposit made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of May, 1989. Mayor City Administrator J OYNER LANES MONTICELLO, Inc. 1 i P.O. Box 246 — Monticello, Minn. 55362 TO: Mayor Maus and Council members DATE: May 19, 1989 City of Monticello FROM: Al Joyner - Joyner lanes RE: (1) Chelsea Road Improvement and Assessment (2) lot Development in Orderly Annexation Area If Chelsea Road needs improvement, that is one decision. The other part of the question is payment. Inasmuch as a formula has been set by the improvement of Main Street (80% Ad Valorem a 20% Special Assessment), then I would suggest continuing with that formula on Chelsea, if it is improved. The platting and land development being done in the OAA seems to be a conflict In terms. A street constructed to a rural development cross section hardly seems fitting for a city street. Lots that are so huge that no one can afford storm sewer assessment (usually assessed on a square foot basis) at a later date, just invites special treatment and political assessment rolls (such as Big lake). As a concerned citizen, I would suggest an immediate moratorium on platting in the township, and then institute platting plans that would be compatible with city planning. Pie shaped 10 -acre lots will surely be sub -divided in years to come and can only cause a future council much misery. A. The council could demand utilities in all OAA development (storm, sanitary and water), and that would resolve the problem immediately. B. Tho council could require alternate building sites be established now on larger lots and then when the utilities are installed, the extra lot, or lots, could be subdivided or not, as the owner wished. All things considered, option "A" most likely would be the moot practical and cost Via city the least. _ tSf Council Agenda - 5/22/89 8. Consideration of final plat approval - Country Club ODurt. Applicant, Floyd Markling. (J.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Staff recommends that the Monticello Country Club Court final plat be approved by Council, as a major update has been made to the preliminary plat which now makes the plat acceptable to the City. As you may recall, there was a problem with the preliminary plat, as the drainage and utility easements through the center of the property were not in place. The final plat that is before you for your consideration does now include the drainage and utility easements necessary to provide the City with access to the water and sewer lines that extend through the property and terminate at the north end of the property near the golf course property. Staff has reviewed the final plat and finds that it is consistent and in compliance with City Ordinance. Please note that the Planning Commission has not reviewed the final plat prior to your decision. According to the Subdivision Ordinance, final plat review by the Planning Commission is not necessary unless the Council deems so. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: J. Motion to approve the final plat of Country Cluo Court. 2. Motion to deny final plat approval of Country Club Court. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative O1. Inclusion of the proper easement lines on the final plat pave the way for Council approval of this final plat. Staff sees no reasons why the final plat approval should be denied. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the final plat of the Monticello Country Club Court. it i �! •�� `er.� �\E .n rad s ,i:.. � 1 to Or .•�o S• �•�•� S+`' � ••�� $ ... '�= S1 � l�•! ���, ? �_� siacx _ ONE , !l; V l� lOM 1100 a {•tOi,.wt 111.{.....•'• y t — N!2 l� . LOR tANO SMEYORS„ INC. KttcO. rrxwttrrt i, l� •� `{�`'�I Council Agenda - 5/22/89 9. Consideration of allowing Monticello Jaycees to use West Bridge Park for teen dance - July 1, 1989. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: In conjunction with the Riverfest Celebration last year, the Monticello Jaycees sponsored a teen dance and, I believe, a car show in the West Bridge Park. The Council authorized the usage of the park for this purpose, and I am not aware of any problems occurring last year. The Jaycees again would like to sponsor a dance from 7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. on July 1 and are requesting permission to use the West Bridge Park. The Jaycees would not be having any beer sales but would like to use the concession stand building. Previous to the usage of West Bridge Park, the Jaycees have sponsored a dance and utilized one of the downtown parking lots but would prefer the West Bridge Park location. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Allow the Jaycees to use West Bridge Park on July 1 from 7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. and also the concession stand building. 2. Do not allow usage of the park for the teen dance. L. �I'A!'P ItFXJUMMGNUA'1'iUN: ( Not being aware of any problems in the past for the dances sponsored by the Jaycees, the staff finds no reason not to support their request. Jaycee members have also indicated they will be hiring off-duty police officers to help in crowd control, etc. D. SUPPORTING DATA: None. -6- Council Agenda - 5/22/B9 10. Consideration of developer agreement - Phase I - Meadows Second Addition. (J .0. ) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Enclosed is a copy of the developer agreement for phase I of. the Meadows Second Addition. As noted earlier, this document is very similar to the Evergreens Development Agreement which you reviewed at the previous Council meeting. There are, however, a few changes to this particular developer agreement which reflect the differences between the Evergreens development and this particular development. In the summary of the agreement below, please review Article 4 closely, as the requirements contained within it regarding the financial gaurantee are not completely consistent with the comparable requirement in the Evergreens Development agreement. Staff recommends adoption of the developer agreement, as it is our view that it sufficiently protects the City's interest with regards to development of the Meadows Second Addition. The following report provides an article by article recap of significant items covering the agreement, and it also highlights those serr.ions that Are significantly different than the Evergreens Developer Agreement. Article 1: Before work is commenced, all plans and specifications must oe approved ny the city. Article 2: No construction shall commence and no building permits shall 6e—Iosu33 before plat of record and all financial considerations are in place. Article 3: The City will provide full-time inspection of the improvement ud�r�ttie time the work is performed. It should be noted, however, that staff will be working diligently with the developer to coordinate schedules and make every effort to provide inspection only when necessary so that costs can be kept to a minimum. Article 5: City shall release the guarantee in a sum equal to estimated costs an7 improvements so completed prior to acceptance of the final plat. In no event shall the City release an amount equal to or greater than 25 percent of project cost prior to the expiration of the warranty period unless the project is fully completed and bonded in an amount equal to the full cost of the project. Article 6: Warranties and bonds provided by subcontractors must identify tii a Cicy as a third party beneficiary. Article 7: Developer shall deposit with the City a separate cash deposit or eng neering, City staff administration, construction and inspection, soil borings, and erosion and siltation control. These funds will be used to pay for City costs associated with actual construction. This deposit is refundable to the developer in the event the funds are not expended by the City. -7- Council Agenda - 5/22/89 Article 10: This article indemnifies the City against any loss, including suit and reasonable attorney fees, incurred on account of injury or death of any person that may have been related to the work mentioned in the agreement. It also requires that the developer provide to the City general public liability and property damage insurance. The developer, at hie own expense, shall install street lighting in accordance with Northern States Power requirements, City policy, and specifications at City's direction. Article 12: The developer shall install traffic and street signs. Article 13: The developer shall place iron monuments in all lot and block corners and at all other angle points and boundary lines. Article 14: Developer's engineer shall furnish an affidavit stating that the site grading was done in accordance with the grading plan. Article 15: This article includes language that binds future owners of the property to this agreement. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve developer agreement. 2. Motion to modify and approve deveiuper dyeeemeuL. 3. Motion to deny adoption of developer agreement. C. STAPP RECOMFIENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the developer agreement with modifications resulting from the discussion pertaining to required financial guarantees. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATION If Council elects to adopt the developer agreement with the 100% guarantee, a motion should be made which indicates the threshold at which a project guarantee increases to 125% of project cost. It is suggested that a construction cost of $200,000 be established as the threshold amount. Projects exceeding this amount must provide a guarantee of 125% of project cost, with projects less than this amount providing a guarantee of 100% of project cost. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of phase I of the Meadows Second Addition Developer Agreement. -a- THE MEADOWS SECOND ADDITION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of , 1989, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, hereinafter referred to as the "City" and VALUE PLUS HOMES, represented by Tom Holthaus, Steve Holker, and Matt Balker, its successors and assigns, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer." WHEREAS, the Developer has submitted a written request to the City as outlined in the preliminary plat application entitled "THE MEADOWS SECOND ADDITION" for the platting and development, hereinafter referred to as the "Development", of the following described property located in the City of Monticello, County of Wright, State of Minnesota, to -wit: WHEREAS, the parties desire that the Development, known as "THE MEADOWS SECOND ADDITION", utilize city sewer and water service. WHEREAS, the Developer has requested the extension of sewer service to the Development. WHEREAS, the parties desire that municipal water lines, sanitary sewer lines, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous surfaced streets, and other improvements hereinafter described, be cunstr%.cted within "Tl3u' :;Lw^O.i SEL'C:.'D AZDITION— development phased in three additions. NOW. THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the parties made herein, IT IS AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO that the Developer will forthwith employ at its expense a contractor or contractors, approved by the City, who will construct municipal water line and sanitary and sewer lines, concrete curb and gutter, and bituminous surfaced streets within the Development. IT IS ALSO AGREED: ARTICLE ONE - PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The Developer shall, at its own expense, forthwith, construct the improvements mentioned above. Before the work is commenced, the Developer shall obtain written approval of the City staff and Engineer of the plans and specifications, including landscape plans, for the work which Shall be prepared by the Developer, at its own expense, in accordance with the City's Engineering guidelines as outlined in the Monticello Design Criteria Manual. Soil borings shall be provided as recommended by the City Engineer and the Developer's engineer jointly. After completion of the work, the Developer's engineer, under the direction of the City Engineer or his assignee, shall prepare all ss -built drawings of the 4 improvements mentioned above in the original mylars. In case of any dispute as to what is meant by the plans and specifications, the decision of the City G r The Meadows Second Addition Development Agreement Page 2 engineer shall control. One set of reproducible plans (mylars) and three (3) sets of the as -built blue line plans shall be delivered to the City by the Developer's Engineer. The Developer shall notify the City of the names and addresses of all the engineers who assist the Developer in the project. All plans for connection to City water service shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to construction of connecting water lines. ARTICLE TWO - BUILDING CONSTRUCTION Developer shall not commence construction of any building on a lot in the Development until all bonds or security agreements required by this Development Contract have been filed and accepted by the City, and until all legal, administrative, and engineering expenses then due have been paid, and also until the final plat of the Development has been filed, along with all restrictive convenants and conveyances, with the Wright County Recorder or Registrar of Titles, as the case may be. A copy of all conveyances and restrictive covenants shall be sent to the City Attorney by the title company, if any, as proof that they were filed or recorded. Developer shall provide a copy of the approved final plat and a copy of the updated abstract for the City Attorney to complete a title search. Five copies of the final plat shall be submitted to the City at the time that the plat is signed by the City for fi' ing aL ...:ght County. NO CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMMENCE AND NO BUILDING PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED BEFORE PIAT OF RECORD AND ALL FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS ARE IN PLACE. The final design cross-section of each class of street or roadway is to be in conformance with the requirements for each class or rcadway as contained in the Monticello Design Criteria Manual. ARTICLE THREE - INSPECTION The City will provide full-time inspection of the improvements during the time the work is being performs The City will charge against the deposit for these and other services at an hourly rate of $50.00. Total cost of inspection of project improvements is dependent on the time to complete such inspection. It is recommended that detailed work schedules be provided so that the inspection costs can be kept to a minimum. ARTICLE FOUR - CONSTRUCTION GUARANTEES This agreement is conditioned upon and subject to the Developer posting with the City a financial guarantee in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the total estimated construction cost for the improvements and the estimated indirect costs in the form of a cash deposit outlined in Article Six as to each phase. 6O) The Meadows Second Addition Development Agreement Page 3 The financial guarantee has been determined for all improvements included in this contract as set forth in Exhibit 1 and is incorporated herein as if set forth in full. The financial guarantee may be in the form of a cash deposit, a bond, or irrevocable letter of credit approved by the City. If cash, deposited in an interest bearing account in favor of Developer and City under Developer's social security number. A financial guarantee shall be written in favor of the City and be used for or to provide for the payment, as payments become due, of all just claims for work, tools, machinery, skill, materials, insurance premiums, equipment and supplies for the completion of the work and for saving the City harmless from all costs that may accrue on account of the doing of the work by the Developer or its agent or to pay the City in the event the City must complete such work, to also insure that the improvements function as intended for their purpose in accordance with the standards established by the City Engineer, and for the costs of enforcing the standards established by the City Engineer and for the costs of enforcing the terms of the bond if action is brought thereon, including reasonable attorney's fees. ARTICLE FIVE - RELEASE OF GUARANTEE The City Council shall not accept dedication of required improvements, nor release, nor reduce f:^-Incia1 guarantee until the Clty EII911teeL ildd submitted a certificate stating that all required improvements have been satisfactorily completed and until the applicant's engineer or surveyor has certified to the Engineer, through submission of detailed "as -built" plans, survey plat of the subdivision, indicating location, dimensions, materials, and other information required by the City Council or Engineer, that the layout of the line and grade of all public improvements is in accordance with construction plans for the subdivision, and that the improvements are completed, are ready for acceptance by the City, and are free and clear of any and all liens and encumbrances. Upon such approval and recommendation, the City Council shall thereafter accept the improvements for dedication in accordance with the established procedure. Upon the request of the Developer, the amount of the guarantee shall be reduced in a sum equal to the estimated cost of the improvements so completed prior to acceptance of the final plat. The financial guarantee shall be reduced upon act-.ial acceptance of the portion of the improvements completed upon recommendation by the City Engineer, and then only to the ratio that the cost of public improvement dedicated bears to the total cost of the public improvements for the plat. For purposes of showing payment, the Developer's engineer shall submit to the City payment estimates, along with lien waivers, for the work done. All reductions of the financial guarantee must also be authorized by the Developer or its agent and the financing institution, if any. In no event shall the City release an amount equal to or greater than 25% of project coats prior to the expiration of the warranty period unless the project is fully completed and bonded in an amount equal to the full cost of the project. The Meadows Second Addition Development Agreement Page 4 Developer agrees to furnish to the City a list of developer contracts being considered for retention by the Developer for the performance of the work required of the contractor. Any changes to the approved plans and specifications shall be approved by the City Engineer in writing before they are made. The Developer will be responsible for not only plans and specifications preparation, but also for providing construction staking of said improvement. All sanitary sewer and water main testing shall be completed and copies of service ties submitted to the City prior to issuance of any service connection permits. SARTICLE SIX - WARRAN`Y� After acceptance by the City, the Developer warrants and guarantees that the improvements constructed will be free from defects in materials and workmanship that may occur within one (1) year from the date the City accepts them. WARRANTIES AND BONDS PROVIDED BY SUBCONTRP.CTORS MUST IDENTIFY THE CITY AS A THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARY. Twenty-five percent (259) of the total construction cost shall be held by the City until all items to be corrected have been tis:ied undc. warrant! c: _.._:1 exp:. -_4c:: cf the warza. ty, ;hlchc :c: occ,4rz later. Guarantee Period: If within the time prescribed by law or by the terms of any applicable special guarantees required by the Contract Documents any of the work is found to be defective or not in accordance with the Contract Documents, the Developer shall correct it promptly after receipt of written notice from the City to do so unless the City has previously given the Developer a specific written acceptance of the particular defective or nonconforming condition. The City shall give prompt notice to the Developer after discovery of the condition. ARTICLE SEVEN - DEPOSIT The Developer shall, prior to the commencement of the work, deposit with the City separate cash deposit for the following items: AJ Engineering construction review and warranty inspection computed at 1-1/29 of construction cost (fixed fee) C1 City Staff Administration 19 of construction cost (fixed fee) C. Construction inspection and plan review �•s' 49 of construction cost. D. $250.00 cash for erosion and siltation control (on deposit) The Meadow Second Addition Development Agreement. Page 5 If, as the work progresses, the cash deposit becomes depleted, then Developer shall deposit additional funds in the escrar account as directed by the City. The City reserves the right to raise the fees for Items A and C if final construction costs are above the original estimate. City shall document costs associated with A and C and any surplus shall be refunded to Developer. The separate cash deposits shall be set forth in Exhibit 1, which exhibit is incorporated herein as if set forth in full. ARTICLE EIGHT - CLEAN-UP The Developer shall keep the premises free from accumulation of waste materials, rubbish, and other debris resulting from the work; and at the completion of the work, it will remove all waste materials, rubbish, and debris from and about the premises as well as all tools, construction equipment, machinery and surplus materials, and will leave the site clean and in a condition as approved by the City Engineer. ARTICLE NINE - OTHER GOVERNING BODIES No utilities and street work shall be done until the Minnesota Health Department approves watermain plans and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency approves the newer plans. The plans and specifications shall be approved by stato and 1 :cal agcncien ac required (i.e. as epartm-antV.::atur .. . Resurce , Wright County Highway Department, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Watershed Management Organizations, etc.). The Developer shall pay for all costs of temporary and permanent relocations of public utility facilities while constructing any portion of the improvements. ARTICLE TEN - CITY DISCLAIMER/LIABILITY INSURANCE The Developer shall indemnify the City against any loss, including suit costs and reasonable attorney's fees, incurred on account of injury or death of persona that may have been related to the work mentioned in the agreement, on account of damage or destruction of property that may have been related to the work mentioned in this agreement. The Developer, at its expense, agreed to repair or replace property damaged, by reason of the work, that belongs to others. The Developer shall provide to the City, at the Developer's expense, general public liability and property damage insurance, protecting the City and the Developer from all claims for personal injury, including death, and all claims for destruction of or damage to property, arising out of or in connection with any operations under these contract documents, whether such operations be by the Developer, its contractor, or by any subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by the contractor or by a subcontractor under him. Insurance shall be written with a limit of liability of not less than $600,000 for all damages arising out of bodily injury, including death, at any time 7 resulting therefrom, sustained by any one person in any one accident, and a limit of liability of not less than $1,000,000.00 for any such damage sustained t The Meadows Second Addition Development Agreement Page 6 by two or more persons in any one accident. Insurance shall be written with a limit of liability of not less than $300,000 for all property damage sustained by one person in any one accident; and a limit of liability of not less than $600,000 for any such damage sustained by two or more persons in any one accident. The insurance policies shall accompany the contract for its execution by the Developer and the City of Monticello. The above insurance policies shall be in full force and effect during the life of this coritract whether or not the improvements have yet been accepted and any warranty periods. ARTICLE ELEVEN - STREET LIGHTING The Developer, at his own expense, shall install street lighting in accordance with Northern States Power requirements, City policy, and specifications at the City's direction. ARTICLE TWELVE - TRAFFIC AND STREET SIGNS The Developer, at his own expense, shall install traffic and street signs as directed in writing by the City Public Works Director. No occupancy permits are to be issued until street signs have been installed. Within forty-five (45) days of signing the agreement, the City shall provide written Z-'ecificationc raid signage. ARTICLE THIRTEEN - MONUMENTATION/WARRANTIES OF TITLE The Developer shall place iron monuments at all lot and block corners and at all other angle points on boundary lines. Iron monuments shall be placed after all streets and lawn grading has been completed in order to preserve the lot markers for future property owners. The Developer shall also provide a minimum of one monument within the Development, set in concrete, for horizontal and vertical control for the City's benchmark syutem. More monuments may be required by the City Engineer to serve the area. The Developer's land surveyor shall furnish the City an affidavit that all iron monuments were placed as stated above. Developer warrants marketability of title to all real estate interests conveyed or to be conveyed hereunder. A title opinion shall be submitted with final plat of The Meadows Second Addition as to th•e condition of title along with a warranty deed for park land transfer. ARTICLE FOURTEEN - CERTIFICATION OF SITE GRADING Prior to the acceptance of the completed subdivision by the City, the Developer's engineer shall furnish an affidavit stating that the site grading was done in accordance with the grading plan as approved by the City within limits acceptable to the City Engineer. The Meadows Second Addition Development Agreement Page 7 ARTICLE FIFTEEN - BINDING EFFECT The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto and shall be binding upon all future owners of all or any part of the subdivision and shall be deemed covenants running with the land. References j A' made herein to the Developer, if there be more than one,0..6nd 1 each and 7 all of them. This Agreement, at the option of the City,e placed ons record so as to give notice hereof to subsequent purchasencumbrances of all or any part of the subdivision and all recording fees, if any, shall be paid by the Developer. ARTICLE SIXTEEN - ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT Upon completion of all the work required, the City Engineer or his delegated representative, a representative of the Contractor, and representative of the Developer's engineer, will make a final inspection of the work. Before the final acceptance is made by the City Council for perpetual maintenance, the City Engineer shall be satisfied that all work is satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and City standards. Final acceptance of said work for perpetual maintenance shall be made by resolution of the City Council upon the recommendation of the City Engineer. 0/0 The Meadows Second Addition Development Agreement Y Page 8 IH WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands the day and year above mentioned. CITY OF MONTICELLO VALUE PLUS HOMES Kenneth Maus, Mayor Tom Holthaus Rick Wolfsteller, City Administrator Steve Holker Matt Holker (CITY) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) as. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrunt aac ackr.V...cdgcd hefore ..—a thl's 011 1989, by Kenneth Maus,Mayor, and Rick Wolfsteller, City AMErnnistrator, of thel City of Monticello, Minnesota, on behalf of the City. Notary Public (DEVELOPER) NATE OF MINI:ESOTA 1 ) as. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1989, by Tom Holthaus, Steve Holker, an�Matt Holker, owners Of value Plus Homes. Notary Public 11 EXHIBIT 1 THE MEADOWS SECOND ADDITION PHASE I ARTICLE FOUR - CONSTRUCTION GUARANTEES The financial guarantee has been determined for all improvements included in this contract for THE MEADOWS SECOND ADDITION as follows: CONSTRUCTION COST GUARANTEE GUARANTEE 1008 ARTICLE SEVEN - DEPOSIT The Developer shall, prior to the commencement of the work, deposit with the City separate cash deposit for the following items: A. Engineering construction review and warranty inspection computed at 1-1/28 of construction cost (fixed fee) B. City Staff Administration 18 of construction cost (fixed fee) C. Construction inspection and plan review 48 of construction cost D. $250 r4TI..LE TE,; - Dj%1.:'IC;: OF ;rrn-.^: The Developer shall cause construction of the municipal water, sanitary and storm sewer and street improvements to commence no later than , and the construction of the municipal water, sanitary and storm sewer and street improvements shall be completed on or before Any extension shall be requested by the Developer in writing and approved by the City Council prior to the completion date above. In the event that the Developer or Contractor has not completed the aforementioned work on the completion date as set forth above, or in the event the Developer violates any of the agreements as set forth herein, the Developer shall be considered to be in default. Should the Developer be in default, the Developer authorizes said City, its officers, its employees, or its authorized agents to enter upon the Developer's property and to complete any uncompleted or improper work. The Developer's security shall be used for all costs incurred by the City, including attorney's fees, that are connected with this work. The Developer shall notify the City Engineer of his intent to commence the improvement work at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to doing so. I /too Exhibit 1 The Meadows Second Addition Phase I Page 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands the day and year above mentioned. CITY OF MONTICELLO Kenneth Maus, Mayor Rick Woltsteller, City Administrator (CITY) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1989, `_y Kar..•.et.`. naus' mayor, and RicK Wo rsteiler, City Administrator, of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, on behalf of the City. Notary Public (DEVELOPER) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) as. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1989, by Value Plus Homes. Notary Public c D/O Council Agenda - 5/22/89 >>• Consideration of request to prepare plans and specifications for restroom in West Bridge Park. O .S.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The restroom facilities at West Bridge Park located near Highway 25 are old and in need of remodeling. The facilities do not provide access for the handicapped and have deteriorated over the years due to wear and tear and vandalism. There are no provisions in these units for year-round use and they are drained with the onset of cold weather and reopened again in late April. During the winter, this park serves as a skating facility. The concession building is heated and serves as a warming house. There are no bathrooms for the individuals who skate here in the winter time. And consequently, the City has received criticism in the past for this. Since the bathrooms are in need of remodeling, the City staff would like the Council to consider replacing the facilities with year-round, heated bathrooms similar to those at the 4th Street park. The restroom building would most likely be located closer to the concession area and could either stand alone or be connected to the existing building. In preparation for this, staff placed an amount of $20,000 in the 1989 budget, which was ratified by the City Council. Prior to beginning any work on this project, City staff wishes to obtain the census of the City Council as to whether the restrooms should stand alone and the type of architecture the Council would wish to see or whether they should be built at alll If the building is designed to stand alone, it could be designed to look more like the hex shelter already placed in the park, or to look more like the concession stand building. At this time, City staff requests direction. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative would be to authorize the staff to prepare some renderings of particular types of buildings as determined by the City Council. These drawings could then be brought back to the Council at the next meeting for a decision as to type of building and authorization to develop plane on said building. 2. The second alternative would be to select a type of building such as a hexagon shaped building to match the existing hex shelter and authorize City staff to prepare plans and specifications along with cost estimates to be reviewed at an upcoming meeting. 3. The third alternative would be to not consider year-round restrooms for West Bridge Park, but to remodel the existing seasonal bathrooms and possibly look at renting satellite toilets for the winter months. 4. The fourth alternative would be to do nothing at this time but make minimal improvements to the existing facilities as needed, and continue to not provide handicap access or winter restrooms. .9. EI Council Agenda - 5/22/89 C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Public works Director and Park Superintendent that the City of Monticello authorize staff to proceed as outlined in alternative pl or #2. D. SUPPORTING DATA: None. -10- Council Agenda - 5/22/89 _ (t2) Consideration of purchasing FAX machine. (K.D.) 0 A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Staff has recently had the opportunity to test two FAX machines. We have found that many of the firms with which we deal, including OSM, Howard Dahlgren, and Springsted, now have FAX machines. Sending and receiving information in this way could save the City time with current projects, agendas, etc. The two models we tested were the Canon FAX 450 and the Sharp FO -420. The quote from Cyberstar Corporation of Waite Park for the Canon is $2,845; and the quote from Reliance Data Corporation of St. Paul for the Sharp is $1,756, which includes delivery, installation, and training. I had the opportunity to receive and send information through both of these machines and preferred the Sharp FO -420. This model was easier to use and I believe would suit the City's needs at this time. B. ALTERNATIVE ACCIONS: 1. Approve the purchase of the Sharp FO -420 FAX machine for $1,756 from Reliance Data Corporation of St. Paul. 2. Do not approve the purchase of a FAX machine at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council approve the purchase of the Sharp P0-420 FAX machine from Reliance Data Corporation for $1,756. We believe that transmitting information by FAX machine would benefit the City by saving time on the progression of current projects, etc. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of quotes from Cyberstar Corporation and Reliance Data Corporation. am l MMM MOM RELIANCE DATA CORPORATION ®®® 1775 OLD HIGHWAY 8 e ST. PAUL, MN 55112 a (612) 631-1976 March 20, 1989 Jeff O'Neill City of Monticello - 250 East Broadway Monticello, MN 55362 Dear Jeff: We appreciate the opportunity to provide you with the following pricing on the Sharp FO -420 Facsimile, which is comparable to the Canon Fax 225. Actually it's BETTER! PROPOSAL !retail Price $2195.00 Less Cash Discount 5439.00 Cost Per Unit $1756.00 LEASE AGREEMENT 12 Months 5205.00 24 Months 5112.00 36 Months $82.00 Buyout Option at End of Term 10% Warranty: 90 Days; all parts and labor On -Sight Maintenance agreement $250.00 Annually Six Rolls of 164' paper/carton $42.00 The above prices also include delivery, installation, and training. We look forward to working with you. It's a nice drive to Monticellol Si er ly, RELIANCE DATA CORPORATION 1775 Ole Hlgt,.Gy 8 S1. Paul. 63 MN 55112 Rosemary Mehl (eu)e� Sales Representative 1ro�e Rosemary Mehl Regional salsa nee,seenlau,s Micro Computers, Faceimils and P0110e1eie ! t 1 ! Proposal for the City of Monticello City of Thermal Paper Systems List Monticello Cauon Fax 270 $2.495.00 $2.370.00 Includes: UHQ, up to 8 1/2" original. 12 second transmission. 20 page document feeder, 14 page memory, halftones (64 level), confi- dential mailbox and more. Canon Paz 450 $2.995.00 $2.845.00 Includes: UHQ, up to 11 3/4" original. 9 second transmission. 30 page document feeder, 20 page memory, halftones (64 level), TTI selector (up to 10), confidential mailbox and more. ( Plain Paper Systems Canon Paz 350 $2.995.00 $2,845.00 Includes: up to 8 1/1" original, 15 second transmission, 30 page document feeder, 7 page memory, halftone (16 levels), book scanning and more. Canon Pat 830 $3,495.00 $3.320.00 Includes: UHQ, up to 11 3/4" original. 12 second transmission. 30 page document feeder, 20 page memory. halftone (64 level), TTI selector (up to 10), confidential mailbox. sheet decurler and more. R t GENERAL FUND AMOUNT CHECK NO. CASH DISBURSEMENTS - MAY 1989 Government Training Center - Reg. Fee - Jeff O'Neill 100.00 26783 MN. Dept. of Natural Resources - Watercraft, snowmobil S ATV Ref.. 490.00 26784 Government Training Center - Reg. Fee - R. Wolfsteller 135.00 26785 011ie Koropchak - Mileage expense 18.50 26786 League of MN. Cities Insurance Trust - Insurance premium 53,537.00 26787 Void -0- 26788 North Star Risk Services, Inc. - Bond renewal 361.00 26789 Gary Anderson - Mileage expense 98.43 26790 Jeff O'Neill - Travel and mileage expense 85.75 26791 U.S. Postmaster - Certified letters for recycling project 34.20 26792 State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll Deductions 90.04 26793 Anoka County Social Services - Payroll Deductions 210.16 26794 I.C.M.A Retirement Trust - Payroll Deductions 503.58 26795 Void -0- 26796 Cragun's Lodge 6 Conference Center - Room deposit - J. O'Neill 70.00 26797 Corrow Sanitation - Garbage contract payment 7,725.60 26798 PERA - Payroll Deductions 1,556.19 26799 Wright County State Bank - FICA, Medicare 6 Federal W/H 5,347.06 26800 Richard Knutson, Inc. - Payment on Water Main 6 Appurtenant Work 35,329.55 26801 MN. Dept. of Natural Resources - Watercraft, snowmobile 6 ATV Reg. 590.00 26802 Adopt -A -Pct Inc. - Animal control expense 70.00 26803 Jerry Hermes - Janitorial Services at Library 227.50 26804 party Fr Izwcdcl coatro-t oa? ado-tr-_..a- 471.00 '-5E^5 Ervin 6 Donna Steltan - Acquisition of property 54,655.70 26806 Wright County Treasurer/Auditor - Closing Fees - Stelton Property 229.60 26807 Wright County Recorder - Closing Fees - Stelton Property 80.00 7.6808 Wright County State Bank - Acquisition of Stelcon Property 4,500.00 26809 Y.M.C.A. of Mpla. - Monthly contract payment 625.00 76810 Preusse Cleaning - Cleaning contract - City Hall 6 Fire Hall 450.00 26811 Wright County Treasurer/Auditor - Property Taxes 1,129.90 26812 Commissioner of Revenue - State Withholdings for April 1,731.42 26813 MN. Department of Labor 6 Industry - Certificate of Exemption Fce 60.00 26814 Copy Duplicating Products, Inc. - COpy machine maint. at Library 43.34 26815 M.N. U.C. Fund - Unemployment benefits 715.24 26816 Federal Licensing, Inc. - License - Civil Defense 85.00 26817 Holiday Gas - Gas - Fire Depart. 28.77 26818 Communication Auditors - Maine. of equip. - Fire Depart. 68.73 26819 U.S. Postmnseer - Certified letter for utility billing 16.00 26820 Back Door - Table for City Hall 98.00 26821 American National Lank 6 Trust Co. - Bond Fees 403.25 26822 MN. Dept. of Natural Resources - Watercraft 6 ATV Reg. 838.00 26823 U.S. Postmaster - Postage 500.00 26824 U.S. Postmaster - Postage 12.00 26825 MN. Pollution Control Agency - Reg. fee for J. Simola 25.00 26826 Norwest Investment Services - Computer payment for May 2,407.61 26827 Midwest Gas Co. - Utilities 698.63 26828 Professional Services Group, Inc. - WWfP Contract 6 add'1 servicis 38,023.90 26829 Bridgewater Telephone Co. - Phone Charges 1,239.69 26830 N.S.P. - Utilities 6,955.60 26831 GAB Business Sorvicea, Inc. - Insuronce deductible - Ban James 250.00 26832 League of MN. Cities Insurance - Insurance premium 560.00 26833 State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll Deductions 90.04 26834 GENERAL FUND AMOUNT CHECK NO• CASH DISBURSEMENTS - MAY 1989 Rick Wolfstaller - Mileage expense 300.00 26835 PERA - Insurance premium 18.00 26836 Crysteel = 90Z payment on new snow plow 11.925.90 26837 Corrow Sanitation - Reimbursements - weight slips - Garbage 58.50 26838 Corrow Sanitation - Add'1 land fill charges 2,747.40 26839 Wright County State Bank - FICA, Federal b Medicare W/H 5,236.10 26840 PERA - Payroll Deductions 1,507.41 26841 I.C.M.A Retirement Corp. - Payroll Deductions 503.50 26842 Automation Supply Co. - Computer ribbons 139.59 26843 Marco Products - Copy paper, repairs 6 Maintenance Agreement 2,946.45 26844 SMith b Hayes - Legal fees for March 6 April 4,063.28 26845 MN. Dept. of Natural Resources - Watercraft b ATV Reg. 596.00 26846 Copy Duplicating Products, Inc. - Copy machine maint. at Library 41.99 26847 J.D.L. Cleaning Service - Cleaning Services at Library 313.00 26848 Richard Knutson, Inc. - Payment P2 - Water Main b Appurtenant Wo,k 123,161.71 26849 Barber Electric Supply, Inc. - Light Fixtures for Softball Field ¢ 735.35 26850 Team Choice - Home Plate - Softball Fields 38.95 26851 Olson 5 SOns Electric - Parts and services 857.04 26852 Monticello Agency - Renewal of Notary Bond - R. Wolfsteller 70.00 26853 Taylor Land Surveyors - Elevations b Mylar Plat 376.00 26854 Maus Foods - Supplies 161.16 26855 West Publishing Co. - 1989 MN. Session Laws 100.00 26856 Pitney Bowes - Postage machine rental 7?.^ -5 2E.057 Marquette Bank Mpls. - 162,000 Parking Facility Bond of 1974 15,473.63 26858 Ken Maus - Travel Expense 98.20 26859 Wright County Treasurer/Auditor - Sheriff's contract payment 12,049.14 26860 Unocal - Gas 59.61 26861 Northern Oxygen Service - Supplies - Fire Depart. 12.30 26862 Monticello Fire Depart - Neil Kranz - Travel Expense 252.42 26863 Monticello Fire Depart - Steve Samuelson - Travel Expense 312.25 26864 Local #49 - Union Dues 115.00 26865 Suburban Gas Co. - Supplies 136.50 26866 Void -0- 26867 National Bushing d Parts Co. -Parts 87.21 26868 Henning b Associates - Professional Services 204.90 26869 Sentry Systems - Flre Alarm Lease 126.00 26870 State Chemical Co. - Concrete Patching Material 153.78 26871 Snyder Drug - Supplies 18.36 26872 Simonson Lumber Co - Supplies 71.38 26873 Mortis's Farm Service - Fertilizer b Supplies 217.98 26874 Ruff Auto Parts, Inc. - Radio 15.90 26875 MacQuoen Equipment - Parte 43.63 26876 Moon Motors - Parts 101.89 26877 State Treasurer/Surplus Property Fund - Parts 42.00 26878 Safety-Kleon Corp. - Maint. of equipment 44.50 26879 Monticello Printing - Office supplies 58.60 26880 Mankato Technical Institute - Reg. Foe - Fire Depart. 160.00 26881 Royal Tire of Monticello - Repairs 620.05 26882 Nelson 011 Co. - Gas 58.35 26883 Loch Jewelers - Engraving - Fire Depart. 5.00 26884 Unitog Rental - Uniform Rental 115.20 26885 Davide Photography - Prints - Streatscape Project 40.00 26886 GENERAL FUND AMOUNT CHECK NO. CASH DISBURSEMENTS - MAY 1989 Monticello American Legion Post 0260 - New Flag - Fire Depart. 30.00 26887 League of MN. Cities - Subscription for Ken Maus 20.00 26888 Monticello-BIg Lake Pet Hospital - Animal Control Services 354.25 26889 North Star Turf, Inc. - Fertilltzer - Park Depart. 1,299.20 26890 The J.P. Cooke Co. - Dog Licenses 74.31 26891 Rheaume's Incorp. - Decals, etc. 1,111.85 26892 Direct Safety Co. - Parts for Water Depart. 98.38 26893 Gould Bros. Chev. - Repairs 82.65 26894 Adam's Pest Control, Inc. - Pest Control Services at City Hall 47.50 26895 Foster Franzen Carlson Agency - Insurance bond renewal 50.00 26896 Motorola, Inc. - 2 pagers S chargers for Fire Depart. 868.00 26897 Coast to Coast - Suppiies 348.36 26898 Harry's Auto Supply - Supplies 338.75 26899 Ben Franklin Store - Supplies 29.97 26900 Purcell Plumbery - Water Fountain - Parks 118.00 26901 Gerald Munn -Sludge Disposal 500.00 26902 Monticello Fire Depart. - Firemen's Wages 2.025.41 26903 Patty Salzwedel - Animal Control contract S Adoptions 445.00 26904 Jerry Hermes - Janitorial Services - Library 227.50 26905 Principal Mutual Life Ins. Co. - Insurance Premium 6,305.83 26906 Turnquist Paper Co. - Supplies - City Hall 248.80 26907 U.S. Postmaster - Postage - Sewer 6 Water bills d Recycling Info, 513.43 26908 Monticello Times - Legal Publications 1.703.96 26909 REM Supplies - Gloves - Street Depart. 55.83 26910 Chaplin Publishing Co. - Ad for bids - Street Project 120.60 26911 Mobil - Gas 172.00 26912 Royal Tire of Monticello - Repairs for Fire Depart. 602.52 26913 Data Management Design. Inc. - Supplies for computer 208.99 26914 Earth Care Paper Co. - Recycled paper 110.88 26915 Century Labs - Cleaners - Parks Depart. 299.64 26916 Monticello TW Hardware - Supplies - Sewer Collection Depart. 3.48 26917 P 6 H Warehouse Sales, Inc. - Supplies - Parke Depart. 139.71 26918 Marlene Hellman - Mileage expense 32.25 26919 Mnrkhurd Corp. - Enlarged print - Plan b Zon. Depart. 160.73 26920 Monticello Housing 6 R.V. Center - Repairs - Fire Depart. 363.60 26921 Monticello Office Products - Office supplies 424.66 26922 Gullings Exc. - Haul street sweeper 300.00 26923 Monticello Ford, Inc. - Repairs 124.81 26924 Jim Hatch Sales Co. - Tools, etc. - Street Depart. 470.72 26925 Auto Truck Service Co. - Painting sweeper 1,208.00 26926 Fast Photo Image - Disc films - Bld. Insp. Depart. 10.50 26927 Karen Doty - Mileage 50.25 26928 Share Corp. - Weed Killer 8 Fertilizer - Parka Deport. 1,077.37 26929 A T 6 T Info. Systems - Fire Phone charges 3.96 26930 Wright County Highway Depart. - Snnd/salt mix 439.12 26931 Superior Products - Sink, faucet, etc. - Concession Bld. 285.50 26932 MN. Dept. of Natural Resources - Watercraft 6 ATV. Reg. 897.00 26933 Corrow Sanitation - Leaf pickup service 600.00 26934 Feedrite Controls - Supplies - Water Depart. 2,844.32 26935 Mobil - Gas 97.71 26936 011ie Koropchak - Mileage expenso 55.50 26937 Dayle Vechas Const. - Completion of Concession stand 950.00 26938 Marco Business Products - Paper, ribbons 6 Maintenance Agreement 440.88 26939 Payroll for April 30,323.99 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS FOR MAY $469.955.01 LIQUOR FUND CASH DISBURSEMENTS - MAY 1989 AMOUNT CI'_ECK NO. Quality Wine 6 Spirits Co. - Liquor $1,693.08 14413 Griggs, Cooper 6 Co. - Liquor 1,902.05 14414 Ed Phillips 6 Sons Co. - Liquor 884.08 14415 Johnson Bros. Wholesale Liquor Co. - Liquor 1,749.13 14416 State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll Deductions 250.00 14417 Travelers Directory Service - Advertising 161.00 14418 PERA - Payroll Deductions 200.97 14419 Wright County State Bank - FICA, Federal 6 Medicare W/H 623.29 14420 Commissioner of Revenue - State Withholdings for April 219.46 14421 Quality Wine 6 Spirits Co. - Wine 506.81 14422 T.V. Fan Fare - Advertising 156.00 14423 NCR Coporation - Supplies 59.13 14424 Zee Medical Service - Supplies 33.10 14425 Coast to Coast - Supplies 14.16 14426 Ron's Ice Company - Ice 111,96 14427 Monticello Office Products - Office supplies 3.18 14428 Dahlheimer Distributing Co. - Beer 15,226.00 14429 Grosslein Beverage Co. - Beer 10,652.30 14430 Thorpe Distributing Co. - Beer 12,946.35 14431 Day Distributing Co. - Beer and supplies 469.70 14432 Dick Beverage Co. - Beer 2,048.15 14433 Jude Candy 6 Tobacco Co.. Inc. - Supplies 537.48 14434 Seven-up Bottling Co.. Inc. - Pop 127.45 14435 Bernick's Pepsi Cola Co. - Pop 241.35 14436 1 V.S.P. - Utilities 539.26 14437 Midwest Gas Co. - Utilities 68.12 14438 KRWC Radio - Advertising 72.00 14439 Monticello Times - Advertising 48.00 14440 Kolles Sanitation - Carbnge Service 141.00 14441 Liefort Trucking - Freight Charges 399.92 14442 Viking Coca-Cola Co. - Pop 288.85 14443 Quality Wine 6 Spirits Co. - Liquor 1,479.53 14444 Bel.boy Corporation - Liquor 2,551.78 14445 Commissioner of Revenue - Sales Tax due for April 7,219.12 14446 Bridgewater Telephone Co. - Phone Charges 81.86 14447 Griggs, Cooper 6 CO. - Liquor 4,009.24 14448 State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll Deductions 250.00 14449 Johnson Brothers Wholesale Liquor Co. - Liquor 1.864.28 14450 PERA - Insurance premium 9.00 14451 PERA - Payroll Deductions 194.15 14452 Wright County State Bank - FICA, Federal 6 Medicare W/H 594.17 14453 Quality Wine 6 Spirits - Wine 722.96 14454 Purcell Plumbary - Supplies 7.99 14455 Principal Mutual Life Insurance - Insurance premium 728.18 14456 St. Cloud Restaurant - Garbage liners 32.18 14457 Eagle Wine Co. - Wine 221.42 14458 Griggs. Cooper 6 Co - Liquor 5,861.63 14459 Ed Phillips 6 Sons Co. - Liquor 2,636.34 14460 JOhnson Brothers Wholesale Liquor Co. - Liquor 1,712.36 14461 'entury Labs - Cleaner 55.45 14462 amity of Monticello - Sower and nater bill 26.98 14463 Payroll for April 3.868.33 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS FOR MAY 86,500.28