Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 09-26-1988Council Agenda - 9/26/88 Public Hearing on Improvements to Floyd Markling Townhouse Development and Monticello Country Cluo - 88-03 Project At7D Consideration of Resolution Approving plans and Specifications and Advertising for Bids on 88-03 Project. (R.il.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: At the previous Council meeting, Mr. Floyd Markling had presented a petition requesting sewer and water extensions to his proposed 8 -unit townhouse development to be located on the former Betty Grossnickle property. John Badalich at O&M had prepared a feasibility study for servicing this property and had estimated the total cost at $62,200 including indirect costs. The feasibility study presented showed a sewer and water extension that could terminate at the Country Club property and also provide service for the Country Club. Although they were not part of the petition, a public hearing was scheduled for this meeting to allow input from the Country Club on a cost sharing arrangement for this project. Although it appears from my conversations with Country Club representatives that they are not interested in the sewer and water improvements at this time, the Council certainly has the authority to order the improvement and provide services if it is feasible. On the other hand, it is also feasible to terminate the sewer and water extension in the Markling property without extending services to the Country Club property at this time. Unless a utility easement was obtained from Mr. Markling for a future extension to the Country Club property line, the Country Club would be faced with a very long extension to connect to County Road 39 if they needed sewer or water in the ` future. It would seem more beneficial for the Country Club to be part of this project at this time rather than waiting and having to extend their r~r` own service connection all the way down to County Road 39 (Golf Course Road) . For the public hearing, I have asked City Engineer, John Badalich, to provide a cost estimate for servicing only Mr. Markling's townhouse L -+amu development if it was decided not to extend the services to the Country SClub. In addition, Mr. Badalich will be providing information on whether the extension would have to be oversized to provide a connection 1 capability to the Country Club. The feasibility study presented at the last meeting indicated an 8 -inch sewer line along with an 8 -inch and a 6 -inch water main. If it was determined to terminate the project within the townhouse development, possibly this sizing could be smaller. Assuming the Council would require the sewer and water mains to be extended through an easement to the Country Club property line, I am sure the Country Club is very interested in knowing the dollar cost of their proposed assessment. As a result, I have asked the engineer to present his recommendation on how the project should be assessed, i.e., what percentage or number of units should be chargeable to the Country Club and Mr. Markling's development. I figured our engineer could better Council Agenda - 9/26/88 determine the appropriate assessment ratio rather than the staff arbitrarily picking out a figure or assigning a dollar cost to each. After all testimony has been received, the public hearing can be closed and a motion to this effect should be enacted. Based on the public hearing comments, the Council then has a number of options for proceeding with this improvement. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative would be to approve the plans and specifications for extending sewer and water to both the Markling development and the Country Club property and to advertise for bids �,- immediately. X14 2. The second alternative would be to approve plans and specifications for only serving the townhouse development and to also advertise for bids. 3. If the improvement was ordered only for the townhouse development, !;•' the option still exists allowing Mr. Markling to do the project ;.;✓�� privately at his own expense. L' C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: " J With the sewer and water petition only being submitted by Mr. Markling at this time, the staff is somewhat uncomfortable with recommending the City order the improvement against the Country Club property against their wishes. From a practical standpoint, this will probably be the cheapest method of ever serving the Country Club property, and it may be prudent for the City Council to order the sewer and water extension for the Country Club even if they are opposed to the assessment. With the Country Club expanding the number of holes to 18 and possibly expanding their club house in the future, it certainly seems appropriate that they eventually hook up to city sanitary sewer rather than using their drain field method. The Council has the authority to defer the assessment for the Country Club until they hook on to the sewer system, which would have to be within three years after it was available. In this case, there may be some justification for a short deferment in that the Country Club did not originally petition for the sewer and water extensions but are involved with the project because of another development. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of resolution. Additional information from the City engineer will be included if obtained prior to delivery or will be presented at the Council meeting. -2- J Orr staveron& Assoaares, inc ' 202t Eas Henneprn Avenue mmneapohs, !nu 55.13 September 22, 1988 cit J363rn0 FAX 331-380b Engmr 5.,cyom Mr. Jeff O'Neill Planners Assistant Administrator City of Monticello 250 East Broadway PO Box 83A Monticello, MN 55362 RE: Floyd Markling Property Dear Jeff: As a follow-up to our telephone conversation regarding the assessable cost of providing sewer and water services to the Floyd Markling property on West County Road 39 in Monticello, the following are several scenarios that can be used in arriving at a reasonable assessment. The estimated project cost including indirect costs for furnishing these utilities to the property is $62,160. This project would benefit the eight parcels proposed on the Markling property and also the Monticello Country Club. We anticipate extending the sewer and watermain through the cul-de-sac to the common property line of the Markling property and the Country Club property. I Method One This method would be an equal sharing of the assessable cost based solely on a per parcel basis. That is, eight parcels in the Markling property and one parcel for the Country Club. Therefore, $62,160 divided by nine equals $6,907 per parcel. Markling's total cost would be $52,253 and the Country Club, 56,901. An easement would be necessary for the utility extention from the cul- �sac to the north property line of Markling's property. Method Two Using the analogy that townhouses are similar to multiple dwellings whereby a multiple dwelling unit receives a 3J4 parcel assessment. Therefore, 3J4 times eight units equals six units for Markling, Country Club, one unit, for a total of seven units. Markling's assessable cost is then $62,160 divided by seven, times six equals 553,280 or $6.660 per parcel, and the Country Club assessment is S8,880. Method Threee What is the additional cost of the total project cost to extend sewer and water from the cul-de-sac to the north property line? This extension only benefits the Country Club and the balance of the project benefits both parties. Estimated cost of this extention is $4,300, including indirect costs. The assessable cost then is, using the equal parcel basis, $62,160 minus $4,300 equals $57,860 divided by nine equals $6,429 per parcel for the eight townhouses and $6,429 plus S4,300 equals $10,729 for the Country Club. Next, using the 314 cost per parcel rationale for multiple dwellings would then be equated to 149,595 for Markling's property, or $6,200 per parcel and $8,265 plus $4,300 equals $12,565 assessable cost to the Country Club. 9 Method Four This scenario would be based on water consumption of a residence compared to a country club usage of its members for sanitary purposes, showers, bar and food service. A residential unit is usually calculated at 75 gallons per capita per day, or approximately 225 gallons per household per day. According to the MPCA, a country club is calculated at 22 gallons per member with no meals, but you would add 10 to 20 gallons per day per member if showers are available. For this calculation, we will use 35 gallons per member per day. Average membership of country clubs is 300 members. We can say that during the course of a day, there are six tee times per hour for a foursome times 10 hours per day equals 240 members. Using 240 members times 35 gallons per member per day equals 8,400 gallons per day. Equating this to residential units, this will equal 8,400 divided by 225 equals 37 residential units. Therefore, 37 units for the Country Club plus 8 units for Markling, equals a total of 45 units. Taking the $62,160, dividing by 45 units equals $1,381 per unit. Markling's assessable cost would then be eight times $1,381 or $14,648. The balance of $47,512 being the Country Club assessable cost. This method of calculation, I believe, is unreasonable. Therefore, in summary, you see we can arrive at a wide and variable range of assessable costs, from $1,380 per unit to $6,907 per unit for Markling. For the Country Club, the assessable amount could vary from $6,907 to $6,880 to $10,729 to $12,565 to $47,512 at the maximum. Based on assessment figures we have developed over the years for Monticello, an 8" lateral sewer assessment averages out to $28.50 per foot. A lateral residential watermaln assessment is $24.75 a foot. Monticello's minimum lot width 1s 80'. Therefore, using the figures noted above, the assessable cost would be 80 times (28.50 + $24.75) equals $53.25 times 80 equals $4,260. For a 100' parcel. this would amount to $5,325 per parcel. Using $4,260 times 8 parcels, this would give an assessable cost to Markling of $34,080 and to the Country Club $28,080. Using $5,325 times 8 parcels equals $42,600 for Markling and $19,560 for the Country Club. ,The average of the two is $38.340 for Markling or $4,193 for each of the 8 parcels. The Country Club share would be $23,820. Jeff, take your pick. I favor the latter split, $23,820 for the Country Club and $38,340 for Markling. If you have any questions in this regard, please give me a call. Very truly yours, ORR-SCHELEN-:,AYERON ASSOCIATES. INC. hnP. Badalich, P.E. ice President JPB/lmt C G ud �cPe-.ter y NOTE: 1 2 7 4 RJRNISN 0, INSTALL I" WATER ANP I-SANITORY SEWER SERVICES. , c; ��T'."PLUO ENO E BLOCK f"OJP. L--zo'PeRw.esAlT. (�� S��a Im ) U R S E ROAD NOTE THIS CONTRACTOR TO SAW CUT, REMOVE B REPLACE BITUMINOUS MAT AS SNOWN IN COMPLETE ACCORDANCE H. NO. 39) WIT" WRIG"T COUNTY PERMIT, I1. 24'TRAVELEO ROADWAY ONLY ':'l•' TACIT COAT 2341 WEAR I—IFI 1 • All ED �S E E RIGHTI G I 3'2331 BASE ?3 1 6' CLASS 0 AGGREGATE BASE I NOTE: VERln WITH ENGINEER rub , I '! 2' 2361 WEAR OUTSIDE OF 24' PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TRAVELED ROADWAY WITH NOTE: PROTECT IN PLACE BIT• FOR THE EXACT LOCATION w II 6" OF CLA33 S ROADWAY EXCEPT WHERE OF SERVICES. SHOWN FOR ?EMOMv_a L. € 1 I 2 LPAO E p Alvl iNY M �, I REMOvE 6 REPLACE 3' SIGNS 11, TAIL ' l A0• ` 100' DONrace �DESTaI I M.H. 1-2 22•V2'6E.V0 �1 / �w , 1-I 6+25 40'LT. -i30••• .., 'I� Y�� lX. �&If. r4vlrlrT 6/ T u v C. �.—= i OAA -Avg /r _ 0 ~ r' 1 I I .1 P �PwluG END 6 ILOCX ►T AIC. r• -•q r-,4ur R ,r s3N 6 16 TEE a rru/ 03 e�2� I..n _—NOTE: ' I REMOVE A S!:- -w E-am p I _ CONNER T. D 6ENO. RL: 6 7 TO WEST. L. I� I LUMP Sum E1: pUTL,OT A NOTE . CONSTRUCTION OF A TEMP ACCESS d ROAD BETWEEN C.$.A,H 39 AND FRONTAGE ROAD LS NECESSARf,JE • CLASS 7 ANO RESTORATION wpy 6E PAID AT UNIT PRICES. C AO• / V CLUB MANOR • 6PEAa INTO EA ..AT ILEVATICN SwOwN 6 GROUT AT NO ADDITIONAL CQMrIN"TIQN /_1, NOTE . TRAFFIC CONTROL. SIGNAGE, AND TEMP_ BY --ASS CU RESOLUTION 88 - RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFT_CATICNS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the Council on September 12, 1988, the City Engineer, Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, has prepared plans and specifications for the improvement of sanitary sewer and watermain extensions from Golf Course Road to serve property owner, Floyd Markling, and Monticello Country Club has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MCNTICELLO, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file at City Hall, are hereby approved. 2. The City Administrator shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the Monticello Times and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for 10 days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the Administrator until a.m. on , 1988, at which time they wsii be publicly opened in the Councu Chambers of the City Hall by the City Administrator and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 7:30 p.m, on 1988, in the Council Chambers. No bids will be consicereo unless sealed and filed with the Administrator and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the City of Monticello for 59 of the amount of such bid. Adopted this 26th day of September, 1988. Mayor City Administrator 5. Council Agenda - 9/26/88 Public Hearing for Moving and Relocation Expenses Pertaining to Acquisition of Property. (O.K.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: This public hearing for moving and relocation expenses is in pursuant of the HUD -Uniform Act, person(s) or business(es) who undergo displacement due to acquisition of property by a government entity are entitled to compensation of moving and relocation expenses. Purpose of the public hearing is to give parties the opportunity to present written or oral testimony, comments, objections, suggestions, and other matters. Public hearing notice was published in the local newspaper. The fixed agreeable moving and relocation expenses are inclusive of the acquisition costs of the Jones, Stelton, and O'Connor (Sellers) properties to the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority (Buyer). Purchase Agreements have been executed between all three property owners and the HRA with closing date on or before March 1, 1989, earnest monies of $10,000 was released to each property owner. Earnest monies was a debit to the BRA General Account. The total acquisition costs are recovered and explained in Modification Plan '#3 for Tax Increment District t2 (next agenda item). Below is the cost breakdown for the acquisition, moving and relocation expenses, and demolition cost incurred by the BRA. JONES PROPERTY (EARNEST MONEY) $10,000.00 CLOSING (LAND) 42,000.00 (MOVING 6 RELOC.) 5,000.00 $57,000.00 DEMOLITION 5,000.00 'DOTAL $62,000.00 O'CONNOR PROPERTY (EARNEST MONEY) $10,000.00 CLOSING (RAW LAND) 40,000.00 (MOVING 6 RELOC.) 5,000.00 TOTAL $55,000.00 STELTON'S PROPERTY (EARNEST MONEY) $10,000.00 CLOSING (LAND) 50,000.00 (MOVING 6 RELOC.) 5,000.00 $65,000.00 DEMOLITION 5,000.00 TOTAL $70,000.00 TO': AL -3- $187,000.00 Council Agenda - 9/26/88 After closing date and demolition of said properties by the HRA, and after closing date between Broadway Square Limited partnership and Farmers Home Administration, then Broadway Square Limited Partnership will acquire said properties plus the Old Ford Garage property from the HRA for construction of a 28 -unit subsidized elderly project. Broadway Square Limited Partnership has received written confirmation to proceed with FmHA Program Form 622 (final formal application) for funding in spring of 1989. With the assumption the public hearing is held and closed without public confrontation, the City Council may proceed to consider approval of a resolution for the acquisition of the Jones, Stelton, and O'Connor properties with acquisition cost to include moving and relocation expenses of $5,000 per property owner which is a fixed payment and agreeable between Jones, Stelton, O'Connor, and the BRA. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Approve a resolution for the acquisition of the Jones, Stelton, and O'Connor properties with acquisition cost to include moving and relocation expenses of $5,000 per property owner (Seller) which is a fixed payment and agreeable between the sellers and the buyer. 2. Deny approval of a resolution for the acquisition of the Jones, Stelton, and O'Connor properties by the HRA. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends alternative 41. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the resolution. -4- RESOLUTION 88- A RESOLUTION APPROVING T9E MONTICELLO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACQUISITION COST INCLUSIVE OF MOVING AND RELOCATION EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE HUD -UNIFORM ACT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, has determined the need to approve the acquisition cost of the Jones, Stelton, and O'Connor properties (the "Sellers") to the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Buyer") inclusive of moving and relocation expenses pursuant to the HUD -Uniform Act, person(s) or business(es) who undergo displacement due to acquisition of property by a government entity are entitled to compensation of moving and relocation expenses; and WHEREAS, the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Buyer") has entered into a purchase agreement with Alvin and Shirley Jones (the "Seller"), with Ervin and Donna Stelton (the "Seller"), and Joseph and Clarice O'Connor (the "Seller"); and WHEREAS, both the buyer and the sellers are agreeable to the terms of the purchase agreement inclusive of $5,000 each as fixed payment for moving and relocation expenses; and WHEREAS, there was presented to this meeting of the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, a copy of the total acquisition budget; and WHEREAS, the buyer agrees to pay $57,000 for the property located at 110 North Locust Street, Monticello, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the buyer agrees to pay $65,000 for the property located at 237 West Broadway, Monticello, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the buyer agrees to pay $55,000 for the property located at 247 West Broadway, Monticello, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Modification 13 for the Tax Increment Finance plan Redevelopment District 92 inclusive of the debt service retirement for the said above properties; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on September 26, 1988, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. before the City Council in the Council Chambers in the City Hall, in Monticello, Minnesota, notice of which has been published once in the official newspaper for the City, not less than ten, nor more than thirty days prior to September 26, 1988; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing all persons and parties were given full opportunity to present written and oral testimony, comments, objections, suggestions, and other matters, all of which were duly considered by the Council; Resolution 88 - Page 2 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVM BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MON'rICELLO that the City of Monticello does hereby approve the acquisition cost of the Jones, Stelton, and O'Connor properties (the "Sellers") to the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Buyer") inclusive of moving and relocation expenses and finds: 1. That the proposed acquisition will contribute to the elimination of blight or deterioration within the area. 2. That the proposed acquisition will eliminate the potential hazards of health, safety, and general well-being of the community. 3. That the proposed acquisition will create a use for a portion of underused land. 4. That the proposed acquisition, demolition, and redevelopment will create needed subsidized elderly housing. The City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, does hereby approve the Monticello sousing and Redevelopment Authority acquisition cost inclusive of moving and relocation expenses. Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of September, 1988. Mayor City Adminlst:ator 8 Council Agenda - 9/26/88 Public Hearing for Modification 43 of Project Costs for Tax Increment District 42. (O.K.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: This the public hearing for Modification 43 of project costs for Tax Increment District 42 for the purpose to give all parties the opportunity to present written or oral testimony, comments, objectives, suggestions, and other matters. Date for the public hearing was set by the City Council on September 12, 1988, thereafter, in pursuant of the Minnesota Statute, Section 273.74, Subdivision 3 and 4, a public hearingnotice appeared in the local newspaper at least once not less than ten days nor more than 30 days prior to the date of the hearing. Once the public hearing has been opened and closed, the City Council may proceed to consider the adoption of a resolution for Modification 43 for Tax Increment District 42. Modification 43 consists of the acquisition and demolition of the Jones, Stelton, and O'Connor properties by the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA). Thereafter, the above listed raw land plus the Old Ford Garage property will be purchased by the Broadway Square Limited Partnership for construction of a 28 -unit subsidized elderly housing facility. The project costs associated with the acquisition and demolition of the three properties were outlined in the prior agenda item. The modification plan includes a bond issuance at $260,000 which will recover cost of the Old Ford Garage project ($91,196), recover cost of the Jones, Stelton, and O'Connor project ($187,000), and recover cost of the bond issuance, capitalized interest, and administrative ($84,804), for a total district project cost of $363,000. The district project cost ($363,000), less $58,000 from Farmers Rome Administration, less $260,000 bond issuance has a remaining balance of $45,000. The HRA proposed 1/2 mill levy will cover the $45,000 balance. The estimated tax increment ($36,084) to be generated and payable in 1991 is sufficient to cover the annual debt service ($30,193) for the 5260,000 (,4i� bond issuance over 18 years at 9.258 interest plus the annual debt service ($4,285) for the Metcalf and Larson securities through 1997. �V y_ r,r The HRA does not deny the high cost associated with the project; however, they believe the long term benefits to the City are justifiable: C/ 1) Eliminates blight in a distressed downtown area; 2) Eliminates the potential hazards of health, safety, and general well-being of the community; 3) Creates a use for a portion of underused land (approximate 10 years without a retail/commercial development interest); 4) Creates needed subsidized elderly housing; 5) Creates pedestrian traffic for existing businesses; and 6) Enhances the Downtown Rehabilitation Project. With the assumption the public hearing was closed without opposition, the City Council may consider the following alternative actions. 1 �. -g- Council Agenda — 9/26/88 B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Adopt the resolution for Modification #3 of Project Costs for Tax Increment District t2. 2. Deny adoption of the resolution for Modification 63 of the project cost for Tax Increment District 12. C. STAFF REMtOENDATION: City staff supports the HRA's rationale of the project costs, therefore, recommends the City Council to adopt the resolution for Modification i3 of project costs for Tax Increment District !2. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of Resolution. Pi -6- RESOLUTION 88- A RESOLUTION ADOPTING MODIFICATION $3 OF THE EXISTING TAX INCRE`!E`1T FINANCE PL41 FOR REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 02 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 273.71 TO 273.78 INCLUSIVE OF THE MINNESOTA STATUTE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, has determined the need to modify the finance plan of an existing tax Increment finance redevelopment district pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Section 273.74, Subdivision 4, within the redevelopment pro3ec: created pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462.411 et seq.: and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, found in 1983 that it was necessary to create a tax increment finance redevelopment district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.71 to 273.78 inclusive; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed modification of the tax increment finance plan; and WHEREAS, the members of the School Board of Education of the Local Independent School District #882 and the Board of Commissioners of the County of Wright have been informed of the fiscal and economic implications of the proposed modification of the existing Tax Increment Finance Plan for Redevelopment District $21 and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on September 26, 1988, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. before the City Council in the Council Chambers in the City Hall, in Monticello, Minnesota, notice of which has been published twice in the official newspaper for the City, not less than ten, nor more than thirty days prior to September 26, 19881 and WHEREAS, at said public hearing all persona and parties were given full opportunity to present written or oral testimony, comments, objections, suggestions, and other matters, all of which were duly considered by the Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO that the City of Monticello does hereby modify the existing tax increment finance plan and finds: 1. That the proposed acquisition of commercial property lies as modified within the finance plan of the Tax Increment Redevelopment District 92 and that the intended demolition will contribute to the elimination of blight or deterioration within the area. 2. That the Tax Increment Finance Plan an modified will increase the amount of bonded indebtedness. 3. That the Tax Increment Finance Plan as modified will increase the portion of the captured assessed value to be retained by the Authority. C Resolution 88 - Page 2 4. That the Tax Increment Finance Plan as modified will increase in total the estimated tax increment expenditures. S. That the Planning Commission has reviewed the tax increment finance plan as modified herein and it conforms to the general plan for development of the municipality as a whole because its final result will increase the City's commercial or housing activity. 6. That the tax increment finance plan as modified herein will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development by private enterprise as it will enable the City to assist a future developer by providing a suitable site for development. The City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, does hereby approve Modification i3 to the Tax Increment Finance Plan for Redevelopment District $2. Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of September, 1988. Mayor City Aominiatrator IN j EN Council Agenda - 9/26/88 8. Consideration of a Resolution Issuing an Order for Abatement of Dangerous Buildings - Cli ford Olson Property. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: At the July 25 Council meeting, a petition was presented from neighboring property owners of the Clifford Olson rental property at 100 East 4th Street requesting Council action to initiate procedures to abate a dangerous building. The current structure is not rented at the present time, and Building Inspector, Gary Anderson, has noted that the building is not fit for habitation and would require major improvements for restoration. The City Council authorized the City Attorney to proceed with the necessary steps to have the property owner either correct the deficiencies or demolish the structure. City Attorney, Tom Bayes, has been in contact with Mr. Clifford Olson to notify him of the building code violations and the threat of safety posed by the structure. Mr. Olson has corresponded with the City Attorney; but at the present time, improvements have not commenced. As a result, in order to follow the procedures according to Minnesota State Statutes, Mr. Hayes has prepared an order listing the violations of the building code, etc., that Mr. Olson will have 45 days to complete. Should the property owner decide not to comply with this order, it is the intent of the City Attorney to file a motion before the District Court for summary enforcement. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Adopt the resolution proceeding with the order for improvements according to Minnesota Statutes 463.15 to 463.261. 2. Do not adopt the resolution issuing the order. This will essentially stop any action on the City's part to correct the deteriorating building. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: In order to proceed with efforts to require the property owner to repair or demolish a dangerous building, it is recommended by the staff that the resolution be adopted and the order issued by the City Council as presented. This recommendation follows the guidelines established by State Statutes and recommended by City Attorney, Tom Hayes. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the order prepared by Tom Hayes; Copy of resolution; Copy of applicable Statutes pertaining to abatement of dangerous buildings. -7- STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WRIGHT City of Monticello. Petitioner, and Clifford Lee Olson and Garnet Elizabeth Olson. Respondent. DISTRICT COURT TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CIVIL DIVISION CASE TYPE: IO ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL UNDER MINN. STAT. SECTIONS 463.15-463.261 TO: Clifford Lee Olson and Garnet Elizabeth Olson Upon resolution of the City Council, City of Monticello, and pursuant to authority granted under Minn. Stat. Sections 463.15-463.261, you are each jointly and severally ordered to make the following repairs to the structures located on Lot Ten (10), Black Sixteen (16). Townsite of Monticello. County of Wright, State of Minnesota: 1. Vent the gas water heater. . 2. Replace ceiling and wall coverings near and around the Stairwell leading to the Second level. 3. Repair the kitchen sink waste pipe. 4. Repair or replace exposed wiring to any non -covered, no ground fault electrical wall outlet box. 5. ,Repair or replace exposed wiring from wall outlet to ceiling receptacle. 6. Cover ceiling hole in kitchen coiling above cooking Stove. 7. Caulk around bathroom tub and repair or replace water damaged flooring. B. Install permanent lavatory fixture support. 9. Replace or repair non -vented. expoaed wire exhaust fan. 10. Shore -up or replace Sagging beams and timbera. 11. Reinforce buckling walls. 12. Eliminate vermin nesting in and about the property. 13. Correct any and all other electrical, plumbing or Building Code violations. 14. Secure exterior roof and siding against further weather -caused deterioration. 15. Secure structures from unauthorized entries. This order is authorized under Minn. Stat. Sections 463.15-463.261 because the structures located on the above-described real estate are hazardous buildings within the meaning of Minn. Stat. Section 463.15, aubd. 3. The structures have reached such a state of disrepair as to become uninhabitable, unsanitary, a fire hazard and a hazard to public health and safety. The structures also constitute dangerous buildings under the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings as adopted by the City of Monticello (Chapter 5. Section 4-5-1, Ordinances of the City of Monticello). Compliance with this Order must be accomplished within 45 days of the date you are served with the Order. In the alternative, you may comply with this Order by presenting to the City Administrator at 250 West Broadway, Monticello. Minnesota, within 30 days of the date you are served with this Order, written and fully executed contracts for the repairs required herewith provided that any contractor you contact with must be bonded and licensed and any contract Oust be performable in full within 4$ days of the contract data. If you do not comply with this Order within the time specified. or you do not file an Answer within the time specified in Minn. Stat. Section 463.18, the City of Monticello will bring a motion before the District Court, Tenth Judicial District, Wright County, Minnesota, for summary enforcement of this 2 9 L, Judicial District, Wright County, Minnesota, for summary enforcement of this Order. DATED: ATTESTED TO: City Administrator CITY OF MONTICELLO by its Council: Council Member Council Member Council Member Council Member Mayor R-41 § $63.16 BUILDING LINE EASEMENTS. ETC 063.16. Repair or remo•at of hazardous building The governing body of any city or town may order the owner of any hazardous building within the municipality to correct the hazardous condit:on of such building or to raze or remove the same. taws 1965. G 393, 12. Amended by taws 1773, a 123, arc S. 17. 3973 Amendment. Laws 1973. c. 123, art 5, ing's destruction when, by reason of economic 4 was a general authantauon for the consoli- impossibility, landlurd did not undertake repairs dation of the terms "vdiagei' and "bomugha•' consututed destruction of buildins by nuh1K au, MW Ne term -aues" or the subsutuuon of the Nonry wmcn, pursuant to lease. terminated tens "statutory cues" for "villages" gad/or Is—. Bur v. Eckes. A 984, 354 Y.W.2d "bomugiu." 8i pp•1 534. ^' Yet" of Deciaiona '-i..•.. L In genteel Cry's actions in ordering leased building e6 Wer need or mpat ed and proceeding with budd• �My 661.161. Abatement In the manner prescribed in Minnesota Statutes, Section 463.21 the governing body of ,tl any city or town may correct the hazardous condition of any hazardous building or parcel of real estate: the cost of which shall be charged agatnct the real estate as provided in section 463.21 except the governing body may provide that the cost so assessed may be paid in not to exceed rive equal annual installments with interest therein, at eight percent per annum. laws Me, G 341. g Z 2916 Amendment. Changed the dtle of regia CSS. Muninpal Corporations 4 31, trar of deeds to county recorder. Library References Slunrupsl Corporations 0.629. 663.17. The order Subdivision 1. Content*. The order shall be in wasting: recite the grounds therefor, .�.t� shall ify the necessary repairs, if any, and provide a reasonable time for compliance: and sstate that a motion for summary be R !ty ` enforcement of the order will made to the district court of the cour.ty in which the hazardous building is situated unless corrective ,•*� action is taken, or unless an answer is filed within the time specified in section 461.18. t • Solid. :. Service. The order shall be served upon the owner of record, or the owner's agent if an agent is in charge of the building, and upon the occupying tenant, if there is _• one, and upon ad :ien holders of record, in the manner provided for service of a summons in a civil action. If the owner cannot be found. the order shall be served upon the owner by posting it at the main entrance to the building and by four wccka` publication in the official newspaper of the municipality if it has one, otherwise in a legal newspaper in the county. p'r ;y 4 " Solid. 3. Filing. A copy of the order with proof of service shall be filed with the i' court admmulrator of di3tnct court of the county to which the hazardous but'.dmg is i �v" located not gess than five days prior to tho filing of a motion pursuant to section 463.:9 m r � ,r enforce the order. At the unity of filing such order the municipality shall file far record r with the county recorder or registrar of tides a notice of the pendency of the proceeding. dencribing with rea.onable certainty the lands affected and the nature of the order If the proceeding be abandoned the municipality snail within ten days thereafter file with the county recorder a notice to that effect 7 Laws 1963, G 393, 1 3. Amended by Laws 1978, c. 181, 1 :; Laws 1986. G 444: Laws 1986, tit Sp.. G 3. am 1, l 82 I.t.: 226 !NE EASE31F-V S. ETC. BUILDING LINE EASEh1ENTS. ETC. of any hazardous building U0 'ding or to raze or Then, by reason of economic .ro did not undertake repairs an of building by public its. suint to Lente. terminated cm. App.1984. 954 N.W.2d 21 the governing body of zardous building or parcel .sal estate u provided in i cast so assessed may be C therein, at eight percent :aporsdoos 1281. ,'to the grounds therefor. ime for compliance; and der will M made to Ne ,:ruated unless correedve ;eeifred In section 463.18. • of record, or the owner's copying tenant. U then is for service of a summons is served upon the owner weeks' publimcion in the a legal newspaper in the 1986 Amendment Laws 1989, C. 444. 4 1. retrieved gender spadlk references applicable to human beings throughout Minn. Stats. by adopt• ing by reference propaed smendmcntr for such revision prepared by the revisor of statutes purr. Want to Laws 1984, r. 489. 1 21, and certified and riled with the secretary of state on Jan. 24. 1986. Section 3 of laws 1786, C. 444, provides that the amendments "do not change the sub• trance of the sutures amended" Note of Decisions Construction and application I Nodes 3 Requisites of order 2 1. Construction and application This section which allows mats and disburaa menu to a petitioner when there is no judgment for tart and a judgment determining the rights of the parties is entered is inapplicable to order Luned under section 463.11 requiring defendant to remove a husrdous building sod other prop erty from his promises. Village of Zumbrous v. Johnson, 196x. 280 Mita. 190. 161 N.W.2d 621L Nonanident owner of real property looted within village within stare must be personally served with village order relating to violation of building '1160on pursuut to Rud" 4.04 of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Ptoadure when the ownses out of state whereabouts are known. Op.Atty.Gen., July S, 196& Under the Huardous and Substandard Build - lop Act it would be artaQb if owoere were notified of the institution a( action. Lod in the butane of an estets which bad not been probes ed notice to the (mown heirs by serving o copy of the order provided for In this section and passing a publication of a notes to advise unknown heirs § 463.19 aid be sufficient Op.ALLy.t:vn.. 19% Jun. Y-° 1966. Requiatles of urdcr " Order directing pnryerty uwnur W cumtit hat• ardous condition or eliminate the -budding must Specify necessary repsus, afford a reasonable time for compliance, must state that a mcuon for summary enforcement vnll be made for noncom• pkuce, and grant 20 days from date of service of order to allow property owner to answer. Village of Zumbrota Y. Johnson. 196& 2SO )fine. 990, 161 N.W.2d 62& 3. Notice Where municipal coryoredon seeks to have private building destroyed because it presents a hazardous condition. acute and opportunity to be heard which are the essence of due preens of law should be provided freely and unequivocally to property owner, because of fact that judg• ment adverse, in the absence of an emergency situation, to the owner mule in lou without compensation. Village of Zumbrota v. Johnson. 1968. 280 Minn. 990, 161 N.W.2d 626. Notice issued by village council giving proper- ty roperty owner alternatives to elinunats hazardous building and debris or to ewe an answer pans• ut to speerfled statute wu not sufficiently per rods to meet requirements for notice and oppor, tnaity to be heard which tae essential conditions precedent for envy of a default judgment in district court action m compel the elimination of a nuisance. Id Notice issued by village council giving proper ty owner alternatives to eliminate hazardous balding and debris or to serve an answer pursu• sot to specaled statues vas deficient In that it filed to specify precisely whu owner was es• panted to do to eliminate hazardous conditions. and because It referred him to an obsolete state - city arrangement U he chum to toe an answer. Id. 4&1.18. Answer j Within twenty days from the dart of service, any person upon whom the order is served may serve an answer in the manner provided for the service of an answer In a civil action, specifically denying such facts in the order u aro in dispute. or laws 1985, 0.899, 14. •s shall be filed with the 4&1.19. Default cues he hazardous building la suint to section 463.19 to If no answer is served, the governing body may move the court for the enforcement of s:ity ahail fits for record the order. If such a motion is made the court may, upon the presentation of such raency of the proceedin , evidence as It may require, affirm or modify the order and enter judgment accordingly, nature of the order. ft fixing a time after which the governing body may proceed with the enforcement of the days thereafter file with order. The court administrator shall cause a copy of the judgment to be mailed forthwith to persons upon whom the original order wu served. C. alas; Lowe 1980, let 9p, Laws 1185. e. 393, 1 L Amended by Laws 1916. lit Sp., a 3, sot 1,1 12. 237 FRA § 463.19 Vote* or Dcawons to general t Reriew 1. In seneral Order vacating default judgment which had been entered without proper notice to owner of pruperty condemned us hurssrdou. or uppurtunity to be heard could not be conditioned on the filing of a bond by landowner to insure payment of costs, disounements, and expenses which would be incurred if judgment adverse to landowner were ultimately rendered. Village of 2umbruta v. Johnson, 1968, 2bl) Minn. 390, 161 N.W.2d 6:6. Notice issued by village council giving proper ty owner alternatives to eliminate hazardous BUILDING LINE EASENEN"M ETC. budding and debris or •o serve an answer pun ant to specified statute was not sufficiently car, twin to meet requirements for nouce and oppor. tunity a be heard which are essential conditions precedent for entry of a default judgment in distract court action to compel the .lint—tion of a nuisance. Id. « itntew Landowner, who was ordered by village court. cd to remove cerrata allegedly hazardous build- ing and penonaliry, and who an appeal W Su. prime Court prevailed on ground that notice issued by village council was deficient, was not entided to uaauon of coeu .and duoumemenu. Village of Zumorom v Johnson, 1463, ": 0 Stine*. 390, 161 N.W,2d 626. 363.:0. Contested eases If an answer is filed and served as provided in section 463.18, further proceedings in the action shall be governed by the rules of civil procedure for the district courts. except that the action has priority over all pending civil actions and shall be tried forthwith. if the order is sustained following the trial, the court shall enter judgment and shall fu a time after which the building shall be destroyed or repaired. as the case may be. in compliance with the order as originally filed or modified by the court. If the order is not sustained, it shall be annulled and set aside. The court administrator of the court shall cause a copy of the judgment to be mailed forthwith to the persons upon whom the anginal order was served. Laws 1965. c, 333, 16. Amended by Laws 1986, 1st Sp.. a 3, art 1, 1 8:. 46121. Enforcement of judgment If a judgment is not complied with in the time prescribed, the governing body may cause the building to be repaired, razed, or removed or the hazardous condition to be removed or corrected as set forth in the judgment, or acquire the building and real estate on which the building or hazardous condition is located by eminent domain as provided in section 463.152 The cost of such repairs, razing, or removal shall be a lien against the real estate on which the building is located or the hazardous condition exists and may be levied and collected only as a special assessment in the manner provided by Minnesota Statutes 1961. Sections 429.061 to 429.081, but the assessment shall be payable in a single installment When the building is razed or removed by the municipality, the governing body may sell Oil salvage and valuable materials at public auction upon three days' posted nocica. Lows 1965. t 393, 17. Amended by Laws 1974. a. 3u, 1 4. 1974 Amendment Inserted "or the hazard, ous condition to be removed or corrected" and inserted "or acquire the building and real estate on which the budding or hazardous rendition u located by eminent domain as provided in aeelton 463.152" in the first lenience: and insetted "or hazardous condition eauts" in the second ten fence. Cron References Correction of hazardous conditions, tee li 463. 161. Coat for removal of budding by municipality aoa 0 463.151. Votes of Decisions In tenerol I Damages 1, In general Where municipal corporation inks ua have private budding destroyed because it presents a ha amour condition, nouce and opportunity to be heard which are the essence of due process of law should be provided finely and unequivocally to property owner, bemuse of fact that judg- mant adverse, in the absence of an emergency 238 BUILDING LINE EASEMENTS. ETC. t vitiation. to the owner results in lass without F assoessauon, Village of Zumrota bv. Johmon, 1362, So Minn. 390, 161 N,W-24 626. t Damages City had power to raze building, after property mier failed to correct hazardous conditions 167.21 Statement of moneys received § .163.,3 identified by city on premises. without acquiring building by eminent domain or paying damages for condemnation. Powell v. City of Clearwater. App.1986, 389 N.W.;d 206. The municipality shall keep an accurate account of the expenses incurred in carrying out the order and of all other expenses theretofore incurred in connection with its enforcement, including specifically, but not exclusively, filing fees, service fees, publics - unit fees, attorney's fees, appraisers' fees, witness fees. including expert witness fees, and traveling expenses incurred by the municipality from the time the order was anginally made, and shall credit thereon the amount, if any, received from the sale of the taivage, or building or structure, and shall report its action under the order, with a statement of moneys received and expenses incurred to the court for approval and 0owance. Thereupon the court shall examine, correct. if necessary, and allow the expense account, and, if the amount received from the sale of the salvage. or of the building or structure, does not equal or exceed the amount of expenses as allowed, the court shall by its judgment certify the deficiency in the amount so allowed to the municipal clerk for collection. The owner or other party in interest shall pay the same. without penalty added thereon, and in default of payment by October 1, the clerk shall certify the amount of the expense to the county auditor for entry on the tax lists of the county as a special charge against the real estate on which the budding is or was situated Lad the same shall be collected in the same manner as other taxes and the amount so collected shall be paid into the municipal a-ut ry. If the amount received for the sale of the salvage or of the building or structure exceeds the expense incurred by the municipal - try as allowed by the court, and if there are no delinquent taxes, the court shall dicot the payment of the surplus to the owner or the payment of the same into court, as provided in sections 463.15 to 463.226. If there are delinquent taxes against the property, the court inall direct the payment of the surplus to the county treasurer to be applied on such taxes. Laws 1965, a 393. 1 B. Amended by Lawa 1974, a 729, 1 1. 1974 Amendment Inserted "attorney's fees' a the ant sentence, 167,23. Payment, tender, deposit In court The net proceeds of a sale under Section 483.:1 or section 463.4 shall be paid to persons designated in the judgment in the proportions as their interests shall appear 9serein. Acceptance of such payment shall be taken as a waiver of all objections to the -ayment and to the proceedings leading thereto on the part of the payee and of all ;ersons for whom the payee is lawfully empowered to act In case any party to whom a -ayment of damages is made be not a resident of the State, or the place of residence be mitnown. or the party be an infant or other person under legal disability, or, being legally tapable, refuses to accept payment or if for any reason it be doubtful to whom any ,syment should be paid, the municipality may pay the same to the clerk, to be paid out hider the direction of the court; and. unless an appeal be taken such deposit with the :ark ehalt•bo deemed a payment of the award. ;awn 1965, c. 397, y 9. Amended by laws 1988, c. 444. 1188 Amendment laws 1986, c. 444. 1 1, sushi to Laws 1984, a 480, 1 21, and certified •emoved gender _pecifie references applicable to and filed with the secretary of state an Jan. 44, -amen beings throughudt Minn. Stats. by adopt- 1986. Section 3 of Lswa ON, c. 444, provides :j by reference proposed amendments far such that the amendments "do not change the sub, nvitian prepared by the revisor of statutes pur- stance of the statutes amended." .a9 101 11 j 463.24 BUILDING LINE EASEMENTS. ETC, 463.:1. Personal property or fixtures It any building ordered razed. removed, or made safe and sanitary by repairs contains personal property or fixtures which will unreasonably interfere with the razing, removal. or repair of such building, or if the razing or removal of the building makes necessary the removal of such penomi property or fixtures. the original order of the governing body may direct the removal of such personal property or futures within a reasonable time. if the property or fixtures are not removed by the time specified, and the governing body subsequently desires to enforce a judgment under sections 463.15 to 463 _6, it may sett the same at public auction as provided in section 363.21, or if without appreciable value, the governing body may destroy the same. Laws 1965, n. 393. I 10. 463.25. Hazardous esesvatlona It in any city, an excavation for building purposes is left open for more than six months without proceeding with the erection of a building thereon. whether or not completed, or if any excavation or basement is not filled to grade or otherwise protected after a building is destroyed, demolished or removed, the governing body may order such excavation to be filled or protected or in the alternative that erection of a building begin forthwith if the excavadon is for building purposes. The order shall be served upon the owner or the owner's agent in the manner provided by section 463.17. If the owner of the land faiLg a comply with the order within fifteen days atter the order is served, the governing body shall rause the excavation to be filled to grade or protected and the cost shall be charged against the real estate u provided in section 463.21. Laws 1965. c. 393, q 1I. Amended by Laws 1913, t I= art. S, q 1; [Awe 198$ a 444. 1973 Amendment laws 1971 4 1^..3, art 5. Noun of Decisions L7, wan a general authoivation for the consoiF oon of the terms "vnllagea" and 'boroughe" "sides" 1. In senerel Inthe farm or the subsotutida of the term "statutory cities" for 'villages" and/or Nooaesident owner of real property locamd within village within state most be personally "boroughs." served with village ardor misting to violation of 1986 Amendment Lw 1986, a 444, q 1. building regulation pursuant to Rule 4.04 of the removed gender specific references applicable to Sfionesote Rules of Civil Procedure where the human beings throughout 914a. State. by adopt, Ing by reference proposed amendments for such owner's out of state whereabouts aro known. reviews prepared by the remor of statutes put Op.Atty.Gan., 690-35, July _S. 1966. suant to Laws 1984, r. 480, q 21, tad carolled Village orders relating to building regulation and filed with the secretary of stats on Jan. 24, violations are official papers and should be 1986. Section 3 of Laws lose. c. u4, provides signed by the mayor and the village clerk. Id. Nuc the 0men1101e1001 "do tot change the Sao - stance of the statutes amended" 463._51. Securing vacant buildings If In any city a building becomes vacant or unoccupied and is deemed hazardous due to the fact that the building is open to trespass and has not been secured and the building could be made safe by securing the building, the governing body may order the building secured and shall'cause notice of the order to be served upon the owner of record of the premises or the owners agent by delivering or mailing a copy to the owner or agent at the last known address. Service by mail is complete upon mailing. 11 the owner of the building fails to comply with the order within ten days atter the order is served, the governing body shall cause the building to be properly secured and the cost thereof may be charged against the real estate as provided in section 463.21. Laws 1973, a 520, q 1. Amended by Laws 1013, d. 123, art S. q 7: Laws 1086, t 444. 1973 Amendment Laws 1973, c, = art 3, into the term "cities" or the substitution of the L7 wax, a general authonumn for the eonsoli• tans "statutory atin" for "villages' and/or tioa of we terms "tnilain" and "boroughs" "boroughs." 241/ ctRrrrti.�� •.. �. Born Ir• RCA huts ing tr nevus S— aws usiseas 4633 Ser and subjs Lan: 87.x, dam Into a 4n. a t. tet Ca dluq . 46311 No to th tom doaa Suss Len, in swear aeon 9 J q s Ij BUILDING LINE EASEMEN'T'S. ETC. § 363.261 1986 Amendment. Laws 1986, c. 444. 4 1, 1986. Sawn 3 of Lowe 1986. c. 444, provides removed gender specific references applicable to that the amendments "do not change the sub. human beings throughout Stinn. Suts. by adopt. stance of the sutura amended." ug by reference proposed amendmenu for such tevuan prepared by the revisor of Stitutes pur Library References tuant to Law. 1984, e. 480, 1 21, and « -fied Health and Environment —J2. and f0ed with the secretary of sure on Jan. 21. U.S. Health and Environment g9 28 to 36, 5't. 461.26. Local aete and charter provisions Sections 463.15 to 363.26 are supplementary to other statutory and charter provisions and do not limit the authority of any city to enact and enforce ordinances on the same subject laws 1965, a 393, 4 12. Amended by Laws 1973, a 123, tat 5, 1 7. 1973 Amendment. Laws 1973, c. 123. Lrt 5, ant to On emergency ordinance enacted following 17, was a general authorization for the mnsoli• a tornado. Op.Atty.Gen., 59--a-15, June 14. dation of the terms ",+pages" and "boroughs" 1963. into the term "cities" or the substitution of the term "tututory cities" for "villages" and/or "boroughs." Noun of 13"1110tts L In genera City round would have the authority to lmms• diaudy Lod surnm rtly remove strucatres pursu• ' 183.261. Relocation benefits Notwithstanding the provisions of Minnesota Statutes. Section 117.56, or any other law to the contrary, all acquisitions of buildings and real estato upon which buildings are located by governmental subdivisions pursuant to the exercise of the power of eminent domain as provided in section, 463.152 shall be acquisitions for the purposes of Minnesota Staruta, Sections 117.50 to 117.56. Laura 1914, e. 341, 6 S. Amended by lava 1978, a $ f 181. 1976 Amendment. laws 1710, c. 2, wit a obsol.ts references and cost Laws 1978, c. 4. revieor'L bill providing for the corraetion of erro• 1 141, directed that a citation lm modified. mous, ambiguous, omitted, anc umatuticttsl tad INDEX CONSULT GENERAL INDEX POCKET PART r 241 M F. 4-- a RESOLUTION 88 - WHEREAS, a petition was received by the City Council of Monticello requesting action to abate a dangerous building, and WHEREAS, a resolution was adopted by the City Council on July 25, 1988, directing the City Attorney to proceed with the procedures required for the abatement of dangerous buildings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO: 1. An order pursuant to authority granted under Minnesota Statute Sections 463.15-463.261 prepared by the City Attorney is hereby adopted. 2. Compliance with this order shall be accomplished within 45 days or the City of Monticello will bring a motion before the District Court for summary enforcement. Adopted this 26th day of September, 1988. Mayor City Administrator J J J J Council Agenda - 9/26/88 9. Consideration of Using Streetscape Surplus Funds for Additions to Base Project. (J.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Construction portion of the Streetscape project is nearing completion which means that it is time for the City to define additional (if any) work that should be done associated with this project. It appears that after additional costs associated with unexpected expenditures are removed from the contingency fund, there remains $13,805 in the fund. A subgroup of the Streetscape Committee met on Friday, September 23, 1988, to discuss the use of the unspent funds and recommends that the funds be used to replace the sidewalk along Walnut Avenue in front of Golden valley Furniture and install tree additional ornamental street lights along the east side of Walnut Avenue between Broadway and the parking lot. Council is asked to review the use of the Contingency fund (see attachment) and make a decision regarding the proposed use of remaining funds. Following is a brief history of how the contingency fund amount was established. As you recall, when the project was ordered, Council placed the difference between the project contract amounts and the base bid budget amount ($16,000) in the contingency fund ($16,767) thus creating a fund total of $32,767. The savings created by the favorable bids were not allocated for any specific purpose. As the project has progressed, a sizable portion ($18,962) of the contingency has been utilized or recently earmarked for specific purposes. The attached budget report shows the detail regarding the use of the Contingency fund. Please note that the purchase of two replacement lights and the spare railings requires action by Council. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Accept the recommendation made by the sub -group of the Streetscape regarding use of Streetscape Project Contingency Funds which calls for purchase of one replacement two globe light, one replacement four globe light, replacement bridge railing, replacement of sidewalk and installation of electrical conduit.along Walnut Avenue in front of Golden vally Furniture and the Auto Store, and finally, installation of three ornamental lights on the east side of Walnut Avenue between Broadway and the parking lot. Funds remaining in Streatscape budget after J �• completion of Alternative 1 will amount to approximately $392. !� r•-'J"'It was the view of the subcommittee and City staff that the purchase of replacement fixtures ie necessary, as future replacement of fixtures is likely to be more expensive than the cost to manufacture a few replacements today. L / Council Agenda - 9/26/88 It was Geoff Martin's view that the proposed sidewalk replacement be the number one priority for funding if Council desires to use remaining revenues. It was also his recommendation to use front and side frontage measurements of adjoining property in establishing the assessment for this improvement. Geoff also suggested that the ornamental lighting be placed on the east side of Walnut Avenue between Broadway and the Parking lot. The Streetscape committee agreed with Martin's recommendation. 2. Consider recommendation and make modifications as desired by Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council approve Alternative 1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Monticello Streetscape Project - Budget Report/Alternative I. -9- MCNTICELLO STRE-SCAPE PROJECT - BUDGET REPORT ALTERNATIVE I. ORIGINAL BUDGE, $333,600 PROJECT CONTRACT TOTALS 5300,633 CONTINGENCY AND "SURPLUS" FUNDS AVAILABLE '632,767 SEPTEYeER 23, 1989 FUNDS REMAINING $13.805 PROPOSED ADDITIONS TO BASE PROJECT os7.,� Golden Valley Furniture/Harry' Auto Sidewal2. - Three Ornamental Lights - East Side of Waln Bec.een Broadway and Par,<ing Lot NET FUNDS REMAINING: 392 • Council Action Needed on Theso Items - Meeting of 9/26/88 Ij—,". S 12 0 D ADDED PROJECT COSTS TO DATE: - Mobile Station Sidewalk and Curb S4.207 - Broken Curb Reolacements $680 - Extra Railing/Misc $5.000 ` * - One two globe light - spare $1.200 � • * - One four globe light - soars Railing $1,700 $3,000 - Spare - Trash Receotacles ($500) - Contingency (Estimate) $3,500 - Arrigoni $175 / TOTAL COST OF ITEMS ADDED TO BASE PROJECT $18,962 (Contingency fund approx $16,000) FUNDS REMAINING $13.805 PROPOSED ADDITIONS TO BASE PROJECT os7.,� Golden Valley Furniture/Harry' Auto Sidewal2. - Three Ornamental Lights - East Side of Waln Bec.een Broadway and Par,<ing Lot NET FUNDS REMAINING: 392 • Council Action Needed on Theso Items - Meeting of 9/26/88 Ij—,". S 12 0 D Cat.-.ci_ minuses - 7/1�88 Gamziina. -.p^oa (S:7 ;e: device) 1. St. c..ty'3 .all _esri7al Seo 13. Cans_":atior. of Ca-=,n'_t7 Su:•Jey. A53'—St- City Ae_-ini3t_1._ 'd tZ. CZ Cil that as :equested, staff has deve: ted _._.. a: .. :•es f^. i.-1emertat :n of a r_� r t'y su.riey. 0'.:e___ 'tent on :] evtv..: •` :'3 Ccn'S of e3C�. alta:C3:i•le. CaL'nc__ 3i__ acted `-a: he f5'JC:�_ a.dlic _C the G81ec ne =--ley c_ ecasa tis ~ ._3t --s_ ny !::-.a --he sue:•ey +_ _e avai_acle in, _rm :]r '_959 __ e% Set. - Se33:_.. mczitn made -v 31-' :_ - to awa: the c:r_-unity su:vey ro;ect to St Coad State Gn:1e:3ity�Su:•Jey at a ;rc:eez cost of $:JO. i!cr-: n see:nde_ _y ::an Tai:, Motion sassed ursa:.ous1[. 15. Cans:de:at'_an of ACroin:rAnt t] Plarninc C=r..-iissien. It was acted by mayor G:ia:gMo that the Plarning Caris3lon was unanimous is :eccmmc.dimg Mori Malone to thO C_w=33'lon. After discussion, motion by 912.1 ?ai:, seconded by lope Tai: to a;;cove the ap.ointment of N.oci Nalene to the ;os-. ion ofP'_anai-.g Q=_;ssitn menta:. Motion ;used uran!.=us:y. 16. Canside:alien of Resolution of awarding Bids on St:eetscare P:oject' Gara:sL a dlect::cal, La scso_.a s 3ecs:::sn:ac Paa:ng. - `Gaof mrtlt of Dahlgren, Shardlcw And Oban, Inc., was present to review the bids associated with the st:eetaca;e project. NA:tin informed Council t''at t`e bids received by the Cit1 were favorable and that the a= of the _ lar bid and alternates is less than the estimated pcojec(oost by over„j 516,000. it wax the C:nsansus of the Guncil that funds remaining for st:setzc3;e project activity be placed is tie contingency fund associated wit: the Pcoject and not be earma:ked for a s;eeifie project pur;ose) N.otien made by Bill !ai: to a;pcove Resolution 88-21, Ae:sptiag Bid and Aut.4oci:iaq Gnc:ac. for Gare:al Site C:rsr:uction and E1ect:1.cal WOVC with Ar:iy:ni Brt`.e:s at a base bid amount of $152,311.60 and direct. c-.n;%;cc_i:n of all altmat s excel for 3-.. Resolution 88-23, Reso1 - Ac_s;tiny aid and Authar -'_ny C:r.t:act with`. Minnet=ka I:cn ..c::s f- thisof^:oish -, of theor-1.#s :as:iry at a base bid arcunz of $_3' l: .00: Reza _um' 88-23 Reso1.,._:n Acte;t_ag Bid and Auzhaz.:ing C:n:rac- for St:eeua;e Lardscs;:gig +*.th Mi-nesuta Va:1sy Landscape at a base �-id amour of 525,3:9.00 and di:ec. c: -,'1s%_-_n of a., altcrAtes asscciatsd w: 1-3.: Awa:! '-a :iy.`.• ny poc:ion of the =eetscape project to the Ca::ns G: -.u; a: a _,d arcunt Of $49,638.00: award %:a grates and t:ee you:a ;o::i:n of the S.:se:sta;e ;:]sec: to I::rsai:.`. ac. at a bud arcus of S. ,633. •at.:n sec-rded by Wac:sr Sm: voting ?n fs'lo: of ::en A: a G::Ca.:a, lar. Fa::, 8:1. !a::, :ra::en $M2. C;;cse_, Car 3::n:;aa. N.:t::r. ;asses. of ?:alin.nsr, Pa: Council Agenda - 9/26/88 to. Consideration of Resolutions Setting a Public Rearing to Adopt Assessments for 88-OIB and 88-02 Project. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: With the East County Road 39 improvement project nearing tion, it is recommended that an assessment hearing be scheduled for October 24, 1988, in order for the assessment roll to be certified fo collection 1989. The improvements also included property along County rom the freeway to Mississippi Drive and the improvements of Dundas Circle in the Oakwood Industrial Park for street and utilities. The original bond financing for this improvement project, which also consisted of wells !3 and f4 and the pump house project, anticipated that an assessment roll would be adopted yet this fall for collection next year. As a result, I have instructed City Engineer, John Badalich, to start preparing the cost associated with this project for preparation of an assessment roll. The project is close enough to being completed to allow the assessment roll to be established. It is proposed that the assessment roll be completed by October 7 allowing the staff sufficient time to mail notices to all affected property owners and publish the public hearing notice. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Set a public hearing for the adoption of the assessment roll for October 24, 1988. 2. Delay the public hearing for the assessments. This would not be in the best interest for the City, as the project is nearly completed and if not assessed this fall, additional tax levies would be required to make up the deficiencies in assessment income. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the staff that the Council adopt the two resolutions authorizing preparation of the assessment roll and setting a public hearing for October 24, 1988. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copies of resolutions. L -10- RESOLUTION 88 - RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSES&4ENT WHEREAS, a contract has been let and the costs determined for the improvement of County Road 118, and County Road 39 between I-94 and Mississippi Drive with watermains and between Mississippi Drive and County Road 75 along frontage road with sanitary sewer extensions and appurtenant work, and improvements to East County Road 39 between Mississippi Drive and city limits with sanitary sewer, watermain, and appurtenant work: and along Dundas Circle with sanitary sewer, watermain, curb, gutter, and street improvements, and the contract price for such improvements is , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvements amount to so that total cost of the improvement will be NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED 8Y THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby estimated to be , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is estimated to be .2. The City Administrator, with the assistance of Consulting Engineer, OSM, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the District affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. Adopted by the Council this 26th day of September, 1988. Mayor City Administrator RESOLUTION 88 - RESOLUTION SETTING A HEARING 1 ON THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on September 26, 1988, the City Administrator was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of Improving County Road 118 and County Road 39 between I-94 and Mississippi Drive with watermains and between Mississippi Drive and County Road 75 along frontage road with sanitary sewer extensions and appurtenant work; and improvements to East County Road 39 between Mississippi Drive and city limits with sanitary sewer, watermain, and appurtenant work; and along Dundas Circle with sanitary sewer, watermain, curb, gutter, and street improvements, and WHEREAS, the City Administrator has notified the Council that such proposed assessment shall be co;,plete and filed in his office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 24th day of October, 1988, in the City Hall at 7:30 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment, and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Administrator is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. Be shall also cause mailed notice to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 26th day of September, 1988. Mayor City AdmLnlstrator 9 4 Council Agenda - 9/26/88 11. Consideration of Upgrading Streets in Monticello Industrial Park. W.S.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Early this summer, the City Council approved an evaluation study of the Oakwood Industrial Park street system in regard to pavement strength. The testing was performed in July by Braun Pavement Technologies and involved loading or deflection testing on approximately 1.6 miles of streets within the Industrial Park. Our primary goal was to determine the in-place strengths and to obtain information in regard to an upgrading to a 10 -ton, all-weather design for the Industrial Park which would not inhibit heavy truck traffic in the spring. The report was completed and delivered to the City just last week. During our evaluation of the report we noticed that it was incomplete. It was missing the northern portion of Fallon Avenue, that area crossing Chelsea Road. This section is being sent under separate cover and should arrive here for Monday evening's meeting. The report basically indicates that all the streets within the industrial Park, with a few small isolated areas of exceptions, are at or above the 7 -ton design. By making some improvements to lower rating areas, we could safely obtain the following spring axle load ratings. Road Designation Chelsea Road Dundas Road Fallon Avenue Thomas Circle Thomas Park Drive TABLE 1 Spring Axle Load 8 tons 8 tons 7 tons 10 tons 9 tons upon review of the report, areas which are of lower strength than the above ratings are as follows: TABLE 2 Location Thomas Park Drive between the Roller Rink and Joyner's Bowling Alley Chelsea Road in front of Clow Stamping Chelsea Road between Simonson Lumber and Joyner's Bowling Alley Dundee Road just south of NAWCO building near the intersection of 117 Spring Axle Load Rating From 7.0 to 7.9 tons 7.2 to 7.4 tons 7.4 tons 6.7 tons ->>. Council Agenda - 9/26/88 Location Spring Axle Load Rating Dundas Road midway point 7.7 to 7.8 tons near drainage swale and slightly to the east Dundas Road just north of 7.3 tons the old IXI building near Fallon Drive These areas may need some additional work to achieve the ratings as per Table 1. Additional study of these areas will determine the amount of corrective work necessary if any. In order to achieve our goal of 10 -ton all-weather roads for the Industrial Park (10 tons is the new county standard), we would have to do the corrective work and then overlay the roadways. The following is a list of the overlays necessary. TABLE 3 Road Designation Overlay Thickness Required for 10 -ton Chelsea Road 2.5 inches Dundas Road 2.5 inches Fallon Avenue 3.0 inches Thomas Circle 0.0 inches Thomas Park Drive 1.0 inches At this time we have not prepared a detailed cost study for the overlays. However, using a typical street width of 40 feet and a liberal cost of $25 per ton for the overlay, one could see costa of $6.10 per foot per one inch of overlay. For example, Chelsea Road with a 2.5 inch overlay would cost $16 per foot, splitting both sides would be $8 per foot. That would cost a 350 foot lot $2,800 if the City were to assess the property owners for the upgrading. These costs are very rough, and it's conceivable that an overlay price could come well below $25 per ton. These costs also assume that the City would pick up the costs of improving the trouble spots prior to overlays. B. ALTERNATIVE AMONS: 1. The first alternative would be to have the staff develop a more detailed cost study and hold a public hearing regarding the proposed improvements based on the premise that all or a major portion of the costs will be assessed to the property owners. 2. Authorize staff to prepare plans and specifications and go to bids to determine actual costs for the improvements under the premise that the City will pick up 100 percent of the upgrading costs. J -12- Council Agenda - 9/26/88 3. Authorize staff to prepare plans and specifications and go to bids, schedule a public hearing at the time bids are received on the premise that we will assess 100 percent of the costs. 4. Upgrade and overlay only those areas of lower strength this fall as maintenance to achieve the Table 1 ratings and consider upgrading in 1989. 5. Do nothing. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It seems appropriate that we should upgrade the roads in the Industrial Park to allow free movement of heavy loads in and out year round. The time table is such that it would be difficult to get a project completed this year. It may be best to go with alternative #4 and improve those low strength areas this year and bid the actual overlays for next spring. We may see some very good prices next year, as the final wear lift on County Road 39 will not be placed until the summer of 1989. This would allow us time to develop some additional cost information and discuss the proposed improvements with more property owners in the Industrial Park prior to making an actual decision or holding a public hearing. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the Pavement Strength Evaluation Report. Road Rater Data Design Analysis Sections are available at City Hall. They are not included in your agenda packet due to the bulk. -13- An expansion Of MIDWEST PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT. INC. '4 Concoreia Avenue, SI, Paul. MN 55104 - 612 i 644-M September 12, 1988 CITY OF MONTICELLO Mr. John Simola 250 East Broadway Monticello, MN 55362-9245 Dear Mr. Simola; EiRAw n .1 II Cuamv S --s So- 1957 PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES cc.w.-C.<..+e.- asp 4u.. Enclosed please find a copy of our report entitled PAVEMENT STRENGTH EVALUATION FOR CITY OF MONTICELLO we sincerely appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you and to the City of Monticello. Should there be any questions regarding the contents of the report or any of our other services, please do not hesitate to call. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 6"rD Gj - 9,,.� David W. Janisch, P.E. Registration Number: 18562 Date: Sha -ler Oagmenl Managemen.. Taump . Asuarcn • 'Y / / .'M v..' ..Y e... m IN, .—. .4"SI Cel 1. �IQnf4Y YM 1 Own. Ural ue .e W 1 ad.0 w !Etna. ut 1 ` ^y . n INTRODUCTION The City of Monticello contacted Braun Pavement Technologies, Inc. to conduct deflection testing on approximately 1.6 miles of city street. The testing was done on July 29, 1988. all of the streets tested are located in the oakdood Industrial Park of Monticello. The deflection testing was done using a Madel 2000 Road Rater at 100 foot intervals in both directions. The test locations were staggered in either lane to provide a net effective interval of 50 feet. The purpose of this report is to evaluate and make recommendations with regards to the in-place effective subgrade R -value, Effective Granular Equivalency and maximum allowable axle loads. Also, to make recommendations for overlay thickness to obtain to a 10 -ton roadway. No traffic data was provided for any of the roadways tested. The ESALs values which were used in the analysis were derived from the Eagandale Industrial Park in the City of Eagan, MN. This industrial park is similar to that in Monticello and, therefore, similar ESAL values were used. The report makes reference to 2331, 2341 and Class 5. These refer to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) Standard Specifications for Construction (1983) Specifications for plant mixed bituminous pavement, plant mixed bituminous surface and aggregates for surface and base courses respectively. (S EQUIPMENT USED A Model 2000 Road Rater (Figure 1) was Used for the nondestructive testing (NDT) . The Road Rater is an electro - hydraulically activated device that super -imposes a dynamic sinusoidal load onto a static load. The amplitude and frequency of the load are adjusted by the operator of the Road Rater for each test point. The static load is mechanically adjusted and is normally set on a daily basis. For this project, the static load was set at approximately 3500 pounds. The dynamic load was held between 3500 and 4000 pounds. This resulted in a continued series of pulses applied to the pavement over a constant static as shown in Figure 2. An 18 -inch diameter steel contact plate was used to apply the load to the pavement. The deflections were measured at the center of the lead area and at 12, 24, and 36 inches behind the center of the load plate. A diagram of the deflection basin and deflection measurement locations is shown in Figure 3. 7�\ Figure 1. Model 2000 Road Rater G) WJ 1 � � DYNAMIC LOAD cz (Peak to Pat*) STATIC LOAD 1 . INCREASING TIME Figure 2. Diagram of Road Rater Loading 0 cc tv t0u w Lu 3 A IL LL U. -4 - m Lu aus ca caa- 0jv DEFLECTION BASIN SHAPE IS A FUNCTION OF 1) THICKNESS OF THE LAYERS 2) ELASTIC MODULUS OF THE LAYERS Figure 3. Deflection Basin as measured by the M.cJol 2000 Road Rate. - 1p; BASIS OF ANALYSIS The analysis was based on the results of the deflection tests and also on information furnished by the client as follows: -the average annual daily traffic -the thickness of asphalt surfacing -the type of soil in the subgrade In addition to the determination of the allowable spring axle load limits for each section as listed in Table 2, design analysis were included as requested which includes the following: -the effective subgrade soil R -Value -the recommended NDT thickness design and/or reconstruction thickness as appropriate The results of the design analysis for each section are included on a separate page followed by the computer printouts for that section for easy reference. The deflection tests are at intervals of about 0.1 mile and the analysis and recommendations have been made over sections of roadway with logical termini. Determining these recommendations makes use of statistical procedures to prevent the adaption of overly conservative values. This procedure raises the possibility that the recommendations may not reflect the condition or strength at some pointz. Therefore, the condition of all the roadway surfaces should be monitored periodically to observe whether occasional spots of distress occur. The Braun Pavement Technologies program NDT was used for the analysis of the deflection data. NDT incorporates the structural relationships that were developed by MN/DOT Office of Research and Development and the thickness design relationships for flexible pavements from the 'AASHTO Guide For Design of Pavement Structures -1986•. The design equation used is for an 85 percent confidence level based on the average AASSTO recommended factors. The traffic volumes provided by the client were transformed into daily equivalent 18,000 pound axle loadings (ESALs) for the analysis. This conversion was based on statewide averages for vehicle distribution and weights as shown in Chapter 71 Pavement Design of the ROAD DESIGN MANUAL, Part II. A tabulation is included shoving the typical vehicle distributions and truck factors. The ESALs may vary by a considerable amount on low volume roads and, if it is found that the ESALs are not representative of the section, the analysis should be done over with the current traffic data. The analysis results and design recommendations for each of the sections evaluated are placed directly before the computer tabulations and plots for each of the sections evaluated. J od joi ® ® m W W fled M a"A � J � Table 1. Sections tested end Information furnished by City of Monticello ............... Pavement Composition Data ............... Age of Present Surface Allowable Roadway Termini Dyerlay Surface(g[j ub¢ base Traffic or Overlay Aele load Chelsea lotion Avenue to Oakwood Drive 1.5. 2331 6.0• Cl S Road 2.0. 2331 Dundas Oakwood Drive to lotion Avenue 1.5. 2341 6.0• CI S Road I.S. 2331 lotion South and of Perk to 1.94 1.5. 2341 4.0• Cl S Avenue 1.5. 2331 Thomas Thomas Park to Cul-de-sac 1.5. 2341 5.0• Ct S Circle I.S• 2331 Thomas Chelsea Rd I[. Jct.)•Chalsee Rd (Y. Jct.) 1.S• 2341 5.0• Cl S Park I.S. 2351 Table 2. Oesion Recommendations Dally Road pesfenatiort Termini EStli Chelsea fallen Avenue to Oakwood Drive 100 Road 19 16.0 2.5 6 Dundee Oakwood Drive to fallen Avenue 100 Road 111 IA.S 1.0 9 fallen Roulh and of Part to 1.94 100 Avenue Thomas Thomas Part to Cul-de-sac 'S Circle Thomas Chalaaa Rd If. Jet.)•Chelass Rd (Y. Jct.) 10 Park Ortva Metal All overiay thicknesses are for 10 -ton roadways. C, ........... Design Recommendations .............. EOR Overlay spr tno R-Yslve ilnchc#1 finca Aele load 16 16.0 2.5 0 19 16.0 2.5 6 iS 15.0 3.0 1 10 15.0 0.0 10 111 IA.S 1.0 9 J expansion o! MI iiu n,. MIDWEST PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT, INC. Ouafiry Seti.cas Since 195% 1404 Concardia Avenue, 51. Paul, MN 55104 — 6121644-2996 PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES E•um of Lr—.vwp� September 22, 1988 Mr. John Simola City of Monticello 250 East Broadway Monticello, MN 55362-9245 Dear Mr. Simple; Enclosed are the corrected Road Rater results for Fallon Avenue from south end of the Industrial Park to I-94. We apologize for the oversight in only submitting a portion of this data with the original report. I have enclosed two copies which are punched so that they may be substituted in the binder for the sections sent previously. Once again, we sincerely appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you and the City of Monticello. Should you have any questions regarding the contents of the report or any of our other services, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, BRAUNPAE VMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 4t,4 /n 60 David W. Janisch, P.E. Senior Project Engineer DWJ/ bw Pove—nl Manapemenl • TesunQ • aoseucn sae w.mp m.0 surf. Yinmfeeo, -M" Si C — ne apfnlelV W , &—E. k" .. Wwuen Ve , a.." aro lemon 41 , firs. 4 FALLON AVENUE FROM SOUTH END OF THE INDUSTRIAL PARR TO I-94 ANALYSIS This section is 2465 feet long and consists of 1.5 inches of 2341 wearing course over 1.5 inches 2331 binder over 4.0 inches of Class 5 base. The estimated daily ESAL count is 100. The surface condition rating is 3.9 with low severity transverse cracking found at nearly every test point. As mentioned previously, M&P trucking is a new truck terminal which is located at the northwest intersection of Dundas Road and Fallon Avenue. Therefore, heavy truck weights are expected on these two roadways. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS R -value - 16 EGE - 15.5 inches Overlay - 3.0 inchesl (10 -ton design) Tonnage - 7 tons per axle DISCUSSION 'The overlay thickness recommended above applies only if the weak areas at test locations at 704 and 1350 are repaired. It is recommended that borings be taken at these locations to help determine the cause of the low in-place pavement strength. The required overlay thickness to obtain a 10 -ton roadway for these two locations is 3.5 inches. A boring will help to determine if additional asphalt should be placed or if the area should be cut out and repaired prior to overlaying. J BRAUN PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - COMMISSION N01 88-427 DATE OF TEST (MIO/U: 7/29/88 CITY OF MONTICELLO FALLON AVENUE DAILY ESL's: 100 TEMPERATURE RANGE (deg.F): 105-105 from: SOUTH E N D OF INDUSTRIAL PARK ASPHALT THICKNESS (inches): 3.0 to: INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 94 TURFACE CONDITION RATI(IG: 3.9 AASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR: 1.73 COMMENTS: (R) 6 (L) REFERENCE THE TEST POINT LOCATION NI1H RESPECT TO THE CENTERLINE/MODIFIED SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTORIESTIMATED ESAL. TEST LOCATION FORCE FREE (FEET) (KIPS) (HII 0 R ---- ---- 101 R 3.01 15.1 206 R 3.03 15.1 III R I.01 15.1 401 R 3.01 15.1 S00 R 3.00 15.0 600 R 3.07 15.1 680 R --- --- 704 R 3.05 15.0 806 R 3.07 15.1 904 R 3.05 15.0 1000 R 3.14 15.1 1101 R 2.95 13.1 1146 L 3.03 15.1 1200 R 2.95 15.1 1250 L 2.99 15.0 1300 R 3.00 15.0 /ISO L 3.02 15.0 1402 R 2.95 15.0 1450 L 2.96 15.0 1300 R 3.00 15.0 1547 L 3.00 15.0 1602 R 3.04 15.1 1650 L 2.97 15.0 1712 R 3.00 15.0 1749 L 2.97 15.1 1800 R 2.97 15.0 1849 L 2.98 15.0 1890 R --- ---- 1934 R 2.98 0.1 1930 L 3.06 15.0 2000 R 2.99 15.1 2050 L 3.04 15.1 2101 R 3.03 15.1 2149 L 3.00 15.1 2200 R 2.98 15.1 2249 L 2.99 15.1 2301 R 3.01 15.0 2349 L 3.03 15.1 2400 R 3.00 13.0 2465 R 2.95 13.1 --SENSOR READINGS (MILS)-- EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE AXLE LOAD DEFL DEFL DEFL DEFL SU86RADE G.E. RESTRICTION 11 12 13 IA R -VALUE (INCHES) (TONS/A1LE) --- 5.32 ---- 3.60 ---- 1.46 ---- 1.08 -- 21 --- 16.4 ---- 8.0 5.18 4.15 1.39 1.03 19 19.7 8.8 5.00 3.89 1.55 1.06 20 20.2 9.0 5.75 3.86 1.42 1.04 2O 16.3 7.9 6.47 4.38 1.74 1.14 17 15.7 7.4 6.22 5.34 1.66 0.84 15 18.6 8.0 7.40 5.10 2.07 1.14 14 15.2 6.9 6.79 4.70 1.89 1.53 16 16.2 7.4 5.99 3.86 1.43 0.97 20 15.3 7.6 5.77 4.11 1.74 1.27 19 18.3 8.3 5.94 4.15 1.90 1.41 17 17.7 7.9 6.04 4.06 1.86 1.36 IB 17.0 7.8 6.37 4.42 1.96 1.44 16 16.0 7.3 6.36 4.54 2.09 1.61 13 17.9 7.7 6.05 4.09 1.95 1.57 17 17.5 7.9 7.60 5.11 2.10 1.87 14 14.8 6.8 4.63 2.99 1.40 1.29 24 18.7 8.9 5.66 3.68 1.39 1.28 20 15.8 7.8 5.96 4.16 1.86 1.48 17 17.8 8.0 5.94 4.00 1.62 1.37 IB 16.6 7.0 5.714 4.18 1.86 1.55 17 19.1 8.3 5.59 3.74 1.57 1.19 19 16.0 8.0 6.30 3.85 1.66 1.:5 19 14.4 7.2 5.89 4.30 1.73 1.19 17 17.8 8.0 5.16 3.63 1.55 1.32 20 18.8 8.6 5.04 3.62 1.70 1.34 19 20.0 8.9 3.43 4.16 1.82 1.38 17 20.1 8.7 6.80 4.37 1.56 1.13 18 14.2 7.0 5.53 3.90 1.I9 1.04 20 17.2 8.1 5.82 3.72 1.11 1.13 21 15.5 7.7 6.27 4.39 1.40 0.99 l8 15.7 7.5 5.05 3.51 1.43 1.02 22 10.2 0.6 3.26 3A2 1.10 0.97 23 16.4 8.1 4.80 3.65 1.23 0.90 22 10.0 8.8 3.91 4.28 1.33 1.04 19 16.6 7.8 6.27 4.59 1.14 0.94 17 16.3 7.6 3.54 3.93 1.18 0.89 21 16.6 8.0 5.17 3.62 1.33 0.90 21 17.5 8.3 COMMENTS SOUTH EGDE OF PARK L-TRANS.CR L-TRANS.CR L-TRANS.CR L-TRANS.CR CIL OUNDAS RD L -RUTTING L-TRANS.CR L-TRANS.CR L-TRANS.CR L-TRANS.CR L-TRANS.CR L-TRANS.CR L-TRANS.CR L-TRANS.CR L-TRANS.CR L-TRANS.CR L-TRANS.CR CIL CHELSEA RD L-TRANS.CR L-TRANS.CR BRAUN PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - COMMISSION NOt 88-127 DATE OF TEST (M/DIY): 1/29188 CITY OF MONTICELLO FALLON AVENUE DAILY ESAL's: 100 TEMPERATURE RANGE Ideq.F): 105-105 frac: SOUTH E N D OF INDUSTRIAL PARK ASPHALT THICYNESS linchesl: 3.0 to: INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 94 SURFACE CORDITION RATING: 3.1 SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR,: 1.73 `) COMMENTS: (R) 6 (l) REFERENCE THE TEST POINT LOCATION PITH RESPECT TO THE CENTERLINE/MODIFIED SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR/EST!MATED ESAL. EFFECTIVE SUBGRADE R—VALUE 0 l i! 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10 1) c _t.,,,i.,,, ....i....i... i....i....i... i,..,),...) SOUTH EGDE OF PAF 101 L—TRANS.CR :06 L—TRANS.CR 311 — L—TRANS. C.R 401 500 L—TRANS.CR 600 E=k.U44TR85 RD 806 L—TRANS.CR 904 — L—TRANS. CR 1 J 1000 L—TRANS. CR 1101 L—TRANS.CR 1146 L—TRANS.CR 1=00 L—TRANS.CR 1250 i L—TRANS. CR L—TRANS.CR 1350 — 1402 1450 L—TRANS.CR 1500 1547 160- 1651) L—TRANS.CR 1712 L—TRANS. CR 1749 1800 1849 IaS%, _ C/L CHELSEA RD _ouo _050 7101 L—TRANS.CR =149 720rj L—TRANS. CR _-49 ::0 1 .349 :4O,j ;;14.5 0 10 _0 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 BRAUN PAVVIENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - CO -MISSION N01 88-427 DATE OFTEST (.101Y):7/:9/BB CITY OF MONTICELLO FALLON AVENUE DAILY ESL's: 100 TERPERATHE RANGE (0eg.F): 105-705 from: SOUTH E N D OF INDUSTRIAL PARK ASPHALT THICKNESS (inchesh 3.0 to: INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 94 1RFACE CONDITION RATING: 3.9 SEASONAL CDP.F.EC110N FACTOR: 1.73 CONrE!ITS: IR) & (L) REFERENCE THE TEST POINT LOCATION WITH P.ESFECT TO THE CENTERLINE/110DIF1ED SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR./ESTIEATED ESAL EFFECTIVE PAVEMENT GRANULAR THICKNESS (inches) V 5 11) 15 0 25 zo 5 4(:) 45 50 o SOUTH EGDE OF F'A F.i 1� � 1 L -TRANS. CR 206 L-TRANS.CR 7111 L-TRANS.CR 401 500 L-TRANS.CR 600 E=hu`?Y� S RD 606 L-TRANS.CR 904 L-TRANS.CR 1000 L-TRANS.CR 1101 L-TRANS.CR 1146 L-TRANS.CR 1200 L-TRANS.CR 1250 L-TRANS.CR 100 L-TRANS.CR 1350 1402 1450 L-TRANS.CR 1500 1547 1602 1650 L-TRANS.CR 171$ L-TRANS.CR 1600 1849 1890 - C/L CHELSEA RD 201)0 2450 2 10 1 L-TRANS.CR 2149 2201) L-TRANS.CR p 2249 Ti)1 :49 2401 2j¢J V 5 X11, 115 20 rJ 130 =5 140 145 SV BRAUN PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - COMMISSION MOi 88-127 DATE OF TEST (M/O/Y): 7/29/82 CITY OF MONTICELLO FALLON AVENUE DAILY ESAL's: 100 TEMPERATURE RANGE (deq.F): 105-105 )roa: SOUTH E N D OF INDUSTRIAL PARK ASPHALT THICKNESS lim0es): 3.0 to: INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 94 SURFACE CONDITION RATING: I.9 h SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR: 1.73 �l COMMENTS: (R) 6 [L) REFERENCE THE TEST POINT LOCATION PITH RESPECT TO THE CENTERLINE /MODIFIED SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR/ESTIMATE] ESAL. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE AXLE LOAD (irons/axle) 0 _ 4 6 B 30 12 14 16 18 20 r! _i....i....�...i....1...,),...1....1....1.........1 SOUTH EGDE OF FART 101 L—TRANS.CF. 206 L—TRANS.CR X11 L—TRANS.CR 401 500 L—TRANS.CR 600 E/kUDUWRaS RD 606 L—TRANS.CR 904 L—TRANS.CR 1000 L—TRANS.CR 1101 L—TRANS.CR 1146 L—TRANS.CR 1200 L—TRANS.CR 120 L—TRANS.CR 104 L—TRANS.CR 1_511 1402 14,0 L—TRANS.CR 1.'.100 1547 1602 1650 L—TRANS. CR 171 174 L—TRANS.CR 1600 1849 161;0 — C/L CHELSEA RD P96 _000 2ngq L—TRANS. CR 2149 2=1111 L—TRANS.CR j '01 J •19 �4i1Q -•460 ri _ 4 6 8 1O 1: 114 16 1B :0 CHELSEA ROAD FROM FALLON AVENUE TO OAKWOOD DRIVE ANALYSIS This section is 2548 feet long and consists of 3.5 inches of 2331 over 6.0 inches of Class 5. The estimated daily ESAL count is 100. The surface condition rating is 3.8 with low severity transverse cracking and rutting at approximately 2/3 of the test points. The City of Monticello's staff informs us that there is a Mn/DOT maintenance shop located on this roadway. Mn/DOT was contacted to find out if any traffic counts were done. They indicated that they had not been. The maintenance foreman indicated that most of the vehicles entering this roadway to the maintenance shop were not heavily loaded. DESIGN REC0MMENDATIONS R -value - 16 EGE - 16.0 inches Overlay - 2.5 inches (10 -ton design) Tonnage - 8 tons per axle DISCUSSION The effective subgrade R -value indicates that the soil is very uniform in strength throughout the section. The same is true for the in-place pavement strength indicated by both the Effective 4f1 Granular Equivalency and the maximum spring axle load �i calculations. The overlay recommendation given above is for a 10 -ton roadway. 0 DUNDAS ROAD FROM OAKWOOD DRIVE TO FALI.ON AVENUE ANALYSIS This section is 2600 feet long and consists of 1.5 inches of 2341 wearing course over 1.5 inches 2331 binder. This section also has a 6.0 inch Class 5 base course. The estimated daily ESAL count is 100. The surface condition rating is 3.9 with low severity rutting located at approximately 1/2 of the test points. According to the City of Monticello's staff, there is a new trucking terminal, .MSP, located at the northwest intersection of Dundas Road and Fallon Avenue. As a result the traffic volumes are expected to be high on these two roadways. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS R -value 19 EGE 16.0 inches Overlay 2.5 inchesl (10 -ton design) Tonnage 8 tons per axle DISCUSSION 1The overlay thickness recommended above is for a 10 -ton roadway. However, it is recommended that a boring be taken at location 149 due to the extremely low in-place pavement strength. The overlay requirement at this particular location is 3.5 inches. It is recommended that a boring be taken at this location to'help determine the cause of the low in-place pavement strength. This area should be repaired prior to the application of the recommended overlay thickness. J 0 FALLON AVENUE FROM SOUTH END OF THE INDUSTRIAL PARR TO I-94 ANALYSIS This section is 904 feet long and consists of 1.5 inches of 2341 wearing course over 1.5 inches 2331 binder over 4.0 inches of Class 5 base. The estimated daily ESAL count is 100. The surface condition rating is 3.9 with low severity transverse cracking found at nearly every test point. As mentioned previously, M&P trucking is a new truck terminal which is located at the northwest intersection of Dundas Road and Fallon Avenue. Therefore, heavy truck weights are expected on these two roadways. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS R -value 15 EGE 15.0 inches Overlay 3.0 inchesl (10 -ton design) Tonnage 7 tons per axle O CIT -1 9 111 013 1 lThe overlay thickness recommended above applies only if the weak area at test location at 704 is repaired. It is recommended that a boring be taken at this location to help determine the cause of the low in-place pavement strength. The required overlay thickness to obtain a 10 -ton roadway for his particular ® location is 3.5 inches. A boring will help to determine if additional asphalt should be placed or if the area should be cut out and repaired prior to overlaying. a( 0 THOMAS CIRCLE FROM THOMAS PARR DRIVE TO NORTH END OF COL -DE -SAC ANALYSIS J This section is 301 feet long and is a cul-de-sac located at the extreme north end of the industrial park. As a result, the traffic volumes are considerably lower and mainly automobile type. As a result, the daily ESAL count for this section is assumed to be 5.0. The surface condition rating is 3.2 with low severity transverse cracking found at nearly every test point. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS R -value - 19 EGE - 13.0 inches Overlay - 0.0 inches Tonnage - 10 tons per axlel DISCUSSION 'The majority of the test points are at or above a 10 -ton load limit. Only two of the test points, location 150 and 200, are below 10 -ton. However, they are close enough to 10 -ton that no problems are expected. No overlay is required to obtain a 10 -ton roadway. If in the future it is found that the ESAL value of 5.0 is too low, it is recommended that the data be re -analyzed using the accurate ESAL value. If the ESAL value is too low, the calculated tonnage value will be artificially high. J 11` THOMAS PARR DRIVE FROM CHELSEA ROAD EAST JUNCTION TO CHELSEA ROAD WEST JUNCTION ANALYSIS This section is 2349 feet long and consists of a 1.5 inch 2341 wearing course over a 1.5 inch 2331 binder. This section also has 5.0 inches of Class 5 aggregate base. The estimated daily ESAL count is 10. The surface condition rating is 3.8 with low severity transverse cracking located at a few of the test points. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS R -value a18' EGE 14.5 inches overlay 1.0 inchesl Tonnage 9 tons per axle DISCUSSION lThere is one distinct weak area between test locations 1902 and 2049 of this section. The in-place pavement strength is considerably lower particularly at test location 2003. It is recommended that a boring be taken in this area to help determine the cause of the low in-place pavement strength. Overlay requirements for a 10 -ton roadway range from 2.5 inches to 3.0 inches in this area. It is recommended that this area be repaired prior to the placement of the 1.0 inch overlay. Another alternative would be to increase the overlay thickness in this 15C foot area to 3.0 inches. It may well be more economical, however, to first repair this area and apply the thinner overlay listed above. The subgrade soil is fairly consistent throughout the section. 0// DATA TABULATIONS AND PLOTS J The data tabulations consist of a heading section which contains information relevant to the section tested. The name of the section tested and information regarding its location is in the upper right of each page. The left part of the heading contains the date tested, the estimated Daily Equivalent 18,000 pound axle loadings (EALs) that are applied to the pavement, temperature of the asphalt mat at approximately one inch below the surface at the time of test, thickness of all the bound asphalt layers, a Structural Rating Number, a Seasonal Correction Factor, and a line for comments relevant to the section or the analysis. The Structural Rating Number is determined by the Road Rater operator and is based on the following scale: 5 new pavement (no cracks) 4 unconnected linear cracking 3 large block pattern cracking 2 alligator cracking 1 potholes and loss of surfacing The Seasonal Correction Factor is used to calculate the deflection that is expected to occur during the spring thaw period. The tabulations contain ten numeric columns and one comment column. These are described as follows: TEST LOCATIONS: A reference used to locate the position of the test point, usually in distance from the beginning of the section. FORCE: The amount of dynamic load applied to the pavement. it is listed in kips. One kip equals 1000 pounds. FREQ: The number of load pulses applied each second. DEFL f1..14: These four columns contain the measured deflection at each test point in mils. Ono mil is equal to 0.001 inch. EFFECTIVE SUBORADE R -VALUE: The effective strength of the subgrade soil as calculated from the resilient modulus which is based on the deflections. It is expressed as an Effective R-valuo based on the back calculated resilient modulus of the aubgrado soil. J W IM 3 EFFECTIVE GRANULAR EQUIVALE:iT (EGE): This is the granular equivalent thickness that is needed to match the overall pavement deflection. AXLE IAAD RESTRICTION: This column contains the recommended axle load restriction that would result in a spring deflection equal to the deflection that would result from the design section. The design section is determined from the design procedure described in the "AASHTO Guide for QDesign of Pavement Structures -198611. CO1,MENTS: This column contains the Road Rater operator's comments regarding the pavement in the vicinity of each test point or location information. A profile plot of,the AXLE WAD RESTRICTION is also produced if the test location references are distances. Plots are usually not produced if the tests are from large paved surfaces such as parking lots. Plots are also produced for the Effective Subgrade q�J R -Value and EFFECTIVE GRANULAR EQUIVALENT thickness if called for i3 in the analysis. The plots are proportionally scaled for both axis so that the information can be quickly reviewed to determsine 13 locations where changes occur. K DEFLECTION TESTING USING THE ROAD RATER , The Model 2000 Road Rater is a trailer mounted device which uses an electrohydraulic force generating mechanism that is capable of applying a vibratory load of variable force and frequency to the pavement. The Road Rater generates the load force by hydraulically oscillating a 2000 pound lead mass up and down. The force generated is proportional to the amplitude of the oscillation. This applied force is measured electronically by three load cells attached to the load plate. The dynamic load generated follows a sinusoidal wave form and its amplitude and frequency are varied to suit the pavement and analysis procedure. During the loading, the pavement deflections are measured at four locations on the pavement by seismic geophones. One geophone is located at the center of the load area, and the other three geophones are located at 12, 24 and 36 inches from the center of the load olate. The four geophones measure the deflections simultaneously, resulting in a measurement of the shape of the deflection basin. With the use of elastic layer analysis, the strength of the individual layers of a pavement can be determined from the deflection basin shape characteristics. The weaker a pavement structure is with respect to the subgrade, the steeper the deflection basin will be. The deflection values inversely represent the strength, of the specific area tested. This testing method is sensitive to the pavement temperature and to the time of year. However, factors have been developed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation to adjust the deflections to represent a springtime deflection, of a pavement with a mat temperature of 80 degrees F. The testing is performed at a selected spacing to form a statistical sample of the pavement strength. Variation in pavement strength does occur between test points. Traffic volume, pavement thickness and subgrade soil type information also is required to determine the allowable spring axle loads for the pavement segment. If at any time they are found to be different, the allowable spring axle load should be recalculated. The deflection tests provide extremely valuable information for setting spring axle load limits and for design purposes. The magnitude of the deflections will remain relatively constant throughout the life of a pavement and will begin increasing only when pavement distress develops. There are indications, however, that the shape of the deflection basin will change within the normal life of a pavement. Pavement condition, during its normal life, should be rated by its roughness or rideability and the surface condition. The surface condition of the pavement in the vicinity of each test point is recorded at the time of the test, but the roughness must be measured separately. 0/ QAreas with lower ratings than Table I 0 200 400 AVAILABLE PARCELS 4). THIC PARK MOO mm ........... 40: V..... cj CHELSEA N/A Ae". z 10, 0 a OUNDAS Z L c! r 71 GENERAL FWD AMOUNT CHECK NO. AT&T Inf. - Fire phone charges 3.95 27990 Ben Franklin - Toilet tissue 26.16 27991 Harry's Auto Supply - Supplies for Mtce. 107.06 27992 Buffalo Bituminous - Gravel 886.75 27993 EL Marketing - Election supplies 112.00 27994 Continental Safety Equip. - Repairs 174.16 27995 State Chemical Mfg. - Snow/ice for St. Dept. 535.00 27996 Communication Auditors - Fire Dept. repairs Y " 84.18 27997 Bergstrom's Lawn 6 Garden - Parts r , v ,�� h '- 17.32 27998 Moon Motors - Blades for mover , vv b+ 12.95 27999 Voss Electric - Bulbs ak5 fit`="• 347.76 28000 Earl Andersen - Playground equipmen and signs 7,828.80 28001 Nelson Oil - Gas 375.50 28002 Maus Foods - Supplies for all departments 154.08 28003 Safety Kleen Corp. - Mtce. equipment for St. Dept. 42.50 28004 Sentry Systems - Water alarm system 90.00 28005 Biff's - Latrine rental - Softball fields 49.23 28006 Monticello Ford - Fire Dept. repairs 36.38 28007 Monticello Printing - Office supplies & mist. supplies 155.20 28008 Local G49 - Union dues 92.00 28009 Holiday - Fire Dept. gas 29.28 28010 General Rental - Dolly rental 5.83 28011 Wright County Treasurer - Property taxes due 1,019.33 28012 AL & Julie Nelson - Sub. renewal 13.75 28013 U. of MN. - Reg. fee for Jeff 0. for seminar 30.00 28014 Foster, Franzen, Carlson - Antique fire truck ins. renewal 58.75 28015 Alvin F. & Shirley Jones - Earnest money on property purchase 10,000.00 28016 Industrial Dev. Committee - IDC banquet ticket 150.00 28017 Emergency One. Inc. - Down payment on aerial ladder fire trk. 212,340.00 28018 • VOID -0- 28019 Latour Conat. - Payment A5 - 39 East 6 Water supply line 24,322.05 28020 Rlchmar Const. - Payment O1 - Pump & Pumphouse project 12,687.25 28021 Gary Anderson - Mileage 104.55 28022 MN. Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg fees 130.00 28023 August payroll 56,952. 75 TOTAL GENERAL DISBURSEMENTS - SEPTEMBER $647,241.55 1988 -- GENERAL FUND -- SEPTEMBER , .,�` ' AMOUNT CHECK NO. Rich Cline 6 Tony Strands - Repairs to F� Sre irucK' 21000.00 - 27879 • E. F. Anderson - Paint � 392.73 27880 Audio Communications - Repairs to radios 295.00 27881 Monticello Office Products - Office supplies 115.37 27882 Viking Pipe Services - Televising sever lines 880.00 27883 Ironsmith, Inc. - Streecscape project expense 5,371.00 27884 Flicker's T. V. - Air conditioner for Mtce. Bldg. t4°' t 249.00 27885 Davis Wacer Equipment. - Parts for water towe� �eh�V tF• 72.34 27886 Century Labs - Supplies - Mtce. Dept. .i '- � `�e„ 80.60 27887 The Plumbery - Concession stand expense c 5,100.03 27888 Buffalo Bituminous - Sand 27,75 27889 Tack's Ind. Cleaning Supplies - Cleaning supplies - St. Dep 156.90 27890 Heikes Bro. - Parts for Water Dept. 399.66 27891 Quality Lawn b Mtce. - Repair timbers at Library 665.00 27892 Copy Duplicating Products - Library copy machine expense 36.00 27893 Servicemaster - Clean carpet b furniture at Library 460.00 27894 North Star Waterworks Products - Meters, etc. - Water Dept. 2,091.21 27895 Int. Society of Fire Serv. Inst. - Fire book manual 151.00 27896 MN. Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees 99.00 27897 VOID -0- 27898 Central MN. Council on Aging - Reg. fee for Karen Hanson 5.00 27899 LaTour Const. Co. - Payments for Water Supply line b trunk water main 72,752.38 27900 Colleen Kuchenmeister - Reg. fee for 0. Koropchak - Star.Ct 75.00 - 27901 Corrow Sanitation - Contract 7,587.90 27902 U. S. 'Postmaster - Postage 'for machine ;,h t�. 500.00 27903 �4 Patty Salzwedel - Animal control and adaptions 485.00 - 27904 Anoka County Social Services - Payroll dad. - '- 210.16 27905 --Jerry 'Hermes - Library janitorial 227.50 27906 MN. Dept. of -Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees 39.00 27907• Yellow Freight'- 39 Project - reimb. by LaTour Const. 158.62 27908 S b L Excavating - Final payment on 86-7 project 2,000.00 27909 Corrow Sanitation - Land fill charges 1,516.80 27910 Commissioner of Revenue - SWT - August 2,391.40 27911 Wright County State Bank - FICA, FWT b Mad. 4,810.22 27912 PERA - Peru W/H 1,333.45 27913 YMCA of Mpls. - Monthly contract payment 625.00 27914 James Preusse - Cleaning city b fire halls 450.00 27915 Arve Grimsmo - Mayor salary 175.00 27916 Dan Blonigen Council salary 125.00 27917 Mrs. Fran Fair - Council salary 125.00 27918 William Fair - Council salary 125.00 27919 Warren Smith - Council salary 123.19 27920 Richard Carlson - Planning Comm. salary 49,27 27921 Dick Martie - Planning Comm. salary 49.27 27922 Ms. Mori Malone - Planning Comm. salary 49.27 27923 Ms. Cindy Lemm - Planning Comm. salary 49.27 27924 Dan McConnon - Planning Comm. salary 49.27 27925 Colleen Kuchanmeiscer - Star Cities Conf. - Jeff b 011ie 115.00 27926 Janette Learseen - Inf. Center salary 105.75 27927 Wilma Hayes - Inf. Center salary 132,75 27928 C Arrigont Oro. Payment ®2 - Streecscape Project 43,978.82 27929 North Central Public Service - Utilities 9.01 27930 Northern States Power - Utilities 7,763.53 27931 PSGI - WWTP contract payment for Sept. 22,083.35 27932 Norwest Investment Services - Computer payment 2,407.61 27933 -1- GENERAL FUND AMOUNT CHECK N0. MN. Dept. of Nat. Res. - Dep. Reg. fees 154.00 27934 Ceramic Ind. Coatings - Block for concession stand 165.00 27935 AME Ready Mix - Concession stand 938.97 27936 Unocal - Gas 95.07 27937 LaTour Const. - Extra work on Ccy. Rd. 39 2,773.00 27938 American National Bank S Trust - Paying agent fee on bonds 567.21 27939 Patcy Salzwedel - Dog food and supplies reimb. 110.10 27940 Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone 1,007.27 27941 U. S. Postmaster - Box rental 16.00 27942 American National Bank d Trust - 1960 G. 0. Bond payment 26,670.00 27943 Wayne Mfg. Co. - Balance due on Christmas decorations 2,315.98 27944 Rick Wolfsteller - Mileage allowance 300.00 27945 Anoka County Social Seriices - Payroll ded. 210.16 27946 State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll ded. 90.04 27947 PERA - Ins. premiums 27.00 27948 Country Lumber - Material for concession stand 665.22 27949 Paul Hoglund - Balance due on concession stand labor 1,950.00 27950 MN. Dept. of Health - Permit fee - Golf Course Road water ext 150.00 27951 MN. Pollution Control Agency - Permit - . 140.00 27952 PERA - Pere W/H 1,346.48 27953 Wright County State Bank - FICA, FWr & Med. 4,740.73 27954 ICMA Retirement Corp. - Payroll ded. 736.17 27955 Monticello Firemen's Relief Assoc. - 1988 State Aid 31,963.00 27956 E. H. Renner &'Sons - Final payment on Well 03 3,387.44 27957 Mark's Realty - Down payment on Stelton's property 10,000.00 27958 Jerry Hermes - Library janitorial 227.50 27959 Mrs. Patty Salzwedel - Animal control expense 485.00 27960 MN. Dept. of Nat. -Res. - Dep. Reg._ fees - 74.00 ' 27961 Joseph &.Clarice O'Connor - Down payment on payment 10.000.00 27962' Monticello Fire Dept. - Salaries 1,014.68 27963 MN. GFOA - MGFOA conference reg. fee 95.00 27964 League of MN. Cities - Municipal Amicus program (Legal) dues 152.00 27965 GAB Business Services - Ded. reimb. on ins. claim - J. Sandbeig 250.00 27966 Unitog Rental Services - Uniform roncal 128.00 27967 Flicker's T. V. - Tapes for council meetings 77.94 27968 Sentry Systems - Alarm system for Fire Dept. 72.00 27969 Century Labe - Snow/ice supplies 242.50 27970 Mid Central. Inc. - Fire Dept. supplies 36.00 27971 M2N. Conway Fire 6 Safety - Supplies - Fire Dept. 291.90 27972 The Plumbery -.Repairs 4.58 27973 Lindberg Decorating - Paint - Cicy house on Hart Blvd. 26.85 27974 Water Products - Water Dopc. supplies 2.341.06 27975 Wang - Computer mtce. and repairs 936.00 27976 Fair's Carden Center - City Hall supplies 18.95 27977 Brenteson Conac. - Streets expense 910.00 27978 Braun Eng. 6 Tasting - Tasting on East 39 project 444.00 27979 Granite City Electric - Streetscape expense 98.75 27980 M & P Transport - Equipment rental at WWTP 1.000.00 27981 Zahl Equip. Co. - Gas tank for Public Works Dept. 2,898.08 27982 J M Oil Co. - Gas - St. 1,634.68 27983 Yonak Landfill - Disposal of old concession stand 231.00 27984 Olson 6 Sons Electric - Repairs 322.76 27985 Wright County Treasurer - Police contract payment 11.896.63 27986 Simplex Time Recorder - Mcce. agreement on city clock 121.80 27987 National Bushing - Parte - Mtce. 112.37 27988 Marco Business Products - Paper 6 copy machine repair 278.78 27989 -2- C LIQUOR FUND August payroll 8. 155.73 TOTAL LIQUOR DISBURSEMENTS $114.265.74 AMOUNT C1&CX LIQUOR DISBURSEMENTS FOR SEPTEMBER - 1988 y0. Eagle Wine Co. - Liquor 362.11 13979 Griggs. Cooper b Co. - Liquor 3.120.75 13980 Quality Wine 6 Spirits - Liquor 828.87 13981 Ed Phillips S Sone - Liquor 208.45 13982 Johnson Bros. - Liquor 590.46 13983 Griggs, Cooper b Co. - Liquor 3,627.11 13984 Eagle Wine Co. - Liquor 141.60 13985 Johnson Bros. - Liquor 891.23 13986 Wright County State Bank - FICA, FWT and Med. taxes 648.22 13987 PERA - Para W/H 212.76 13988 Commissioner of Revenue - SWT 283.27 13989 Johnson Bros. - Liquor 944.89 13990 Ed Phillips 6 Sons - Liquor 2,701.81 13991 Quality Wine - Liquor 622.96 13992 Griggs, Cooper 6 Co. - Liquor 2,412.00 13993 Eagle Wine Co. - Liquor 49.83 13994 Ron's Ice Co. - Ice purchase 821.48 13995 Liefert Trucking - Freight 549.46 13996 Coca-Cola - Mise. mdse. 515.85 13997 Hi -Way Liquor - Reimbursement for cabinet 65.00 13998 Twin Cities Flag Source - Flag and flag pole 850.00 13999 Bernick's Pepsi Cola - Misc. mdse. 474.90 13400 Dahlheimer Diet. Co. - Beer 23.957.15 14001 Thorpe Diet. Co. - Beer 12.466.25 14002 Dick Beverage - Beer 2,090.75 14003 Rolles'Sanitation - Garbage contract 137.00 14004 Monticello Times - Adv. 36.00 14005 Jude Candy 6 Tobacco - Misc. mdse. 937.44 14006 Seven Up Bottling - Misc. mdea. 216.20 14007 Groselein Beverage Co. - Beer 18,786.42 14008 Day Diet. Co. - Beer 1,369.85 14009 Rubald Beverage Co. - Wine 202.50 14010 Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone 68.49 14011 Maus Foods - Misc. supplies 23.61 14012 Northern States Power - Utilities 958.62 14013 Ed Phillips 6 Sons - Liquor 98.70 14014 Grigg:, Coopei - Liquor 5,899.05 14015 Quality Wine - Liquor 787.66 14016 Johnson Bros. - Liquor 687.87 14017 Commissioner of Revenue - Sales tax for August 8.921.24 14018 PERA - Int. premium 9.00 14019 State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll dad. 250.00 14020 Wright County State Bank - FICA, FWT and Mad. 565.07 14021 PERA - Para W/H 193.99 14022 Griggs. Cooper - Liquor 3.789.36 14023 Eagle Wine Co. - Liquor 666.11 14024 Johnson Bros. - Liquor 856.12 14025 Ed Phillipe 6 Sons - Liquor 1,432.57 14026 August payroll 8. 155.73 TOTAL LIQUOR DISBURSEMENTS $114.265.74 CITY Or MOIRICELLO Monthly Bull6in7 Department Report Month of AUGUST , 1988 ( PCRMITS MID USES Le9t Tht. Same Month Leet Yea[ la Yae[ PERMITS ISSUED Month JULY Non th AUGUST Laet Y. To Oe to To De to RESIDENTIAL Hum bar 11 14 10 67 value cion S 114,800.00 9 360,700.00 9 86,800.00 97,917,700.00 S2.162.000.63 00 teas 1,318.94 2,677.64 1,075.79 72,988.78 21,279.10 5urmh.1g.. 55.90 178.90 42.33 1,955.04 1,074.10 COMMERCIAL Numbs[ 2 3 1 IS 16 Valuation 157,600.00 344,100.00 6,000.00 693,170.00 96),100.00 Peso 1,774.64 2,057.78 SI.00 5,177.77 7, 35a.82 Surcharges 78.90 122.05 7.00 ]50.80 481.55 INDUSTRIAL Num bar 1 I va luetlon 752,000.00 4,600.00 Fees 4,612.57 ' 6.00 Surcnar90• 376.00 2.30 PLUMBING Number 2 S 2 44 37 Fee• 65.00 128.00 49.00 11527.00 851.00 Surcharges 1.00 2.50 1.00 22.00 17.50 OTHER9 Number 3 11 Ve luatlon 7,000.00 63,400.00 roes 60.00 742.50 Surcharge• 1.50 41.50 TOTAL NO. PERMITS IS 22 16 141 127 TOTAL VALUATION 7 272,600.00 S 604,400.00 S 95,800.00: 5,442.230.00 7,129,700.00 TOTAL rECS S 7,116.58 S 4,863.02 S 1,265.19 45,044.62 29,426.92 TOTAL SURCHARGED S 135.80 S 301.45 6 47.89 9 2,745.34 S 1,571.45 CURRENT MONTH ' rem Humber tR Deis PERMIT NATURE Number PERMIT SURCHARGE valuation Thle year' Leet year Singl• really 4 92,080.24 S 149.25 9298,500.00 IB 26 OUPI4• 1 2 Multi.fem lly I 3 Com4rc lel 1 215.72 5.75 11,500.00 5 2 In6u.trlal I 1 Ree. Gerapa• 7 767.30 20.00 40,000.00 6 0 Sign. 0 0 Public Building. 1 1,792.06 11].Oo 227,600.00 2 0 ALTERATION OR REPAIR owe 11 lops 1 216.90 9.11 20,700.00 49 30 Comma rclal I 50.00 2.30 5,000.00 9 18 Indu.trlae 0 0 0 PLUMOwn All Types 5 126.00 2.50 27 44 ACCESSORY STRUCTURED 8v1ming Pont• 0 1 Deck. 1 15.00 .50 1,500.00 6 9 TEMPORARY PERMIT 0 0 DEMOLITION 0 1 if TOTALS 22 64.863.02 1 707.45 3604.400.00 127 141 PLANS nLV1EN 011-1131 loo-, L Ge1e4. 1ADIVIDUAL PERMIT ACTIVITY REPORT ur I Ila rvin L Ohlrlly Sttev/007 At- BI. 57.90 I 0.-1737 Illou ea L Get eye DY Month of AUGUST 1988 I �b0-1771 I Mous• L l:et Ay. 1 PERMIT DESCRIPTION TYPE NME/I.00ATI011 VALUATION FEES IMontloallu Country Club/1209 Golf Course Ddl DL.07 , tNMOU Illouse L G..... 6Y PERMIT SURCIIMGE PLUMBING SURCIIARGE IBB -1230 Beteched Gerepe RG F. rmlt 00,1111/119 No.t At... at -t 4,000.00 40.00 2.00 -1271 Ilou.o L Gelega Sr On rvin L Sid [loy 9t rev/807 Noel 01vor Gt. BEL.500.00 528. 98 II.7S 10.00 .50 IOB BS -1211 Ilouoe L Getege 6r D. yle V1 c 11.. COneL./711 Me rvin I:IVOOd Ad. 59 ,70,.,0 412.74 29.05 23.no .50 I68-1271 Iluu.. L Gereye S!' Itlll [ L ll Coupt./SOI M[nnlsote Rt[aet f ]4_10,1,00 1]1.87 37.70 24.00 .50 Iron le L Garega Reohln9le AJ lard Andll oon/1000 Lett Rlvar Gtrall 1,500.00 15.00 .50 00-1275 I Ilouoe L :e[egs Reoldlny AB Garold tle[go[on/IIS Mervin El�oold Roed 7, 400.00 09.90 1.70 �Ub-17]0 00-1737 I Ilousl hath 1 All Cha rZl 6talnma tr/91] Ee1t Ilt oedvey I _500.00 15.00 .y0 OU -17]0 Golf Celt Sto[epe Bulldln9 I 1 C dont l..s. fountty Club/1209 Golf Cout om n 11.500.00 1]0.50 5.75 00-12]9 In1111or Ramd111 I M Jon L Ce too I.0 ndtw r9/)12 Eeet Rlvar 6[rmet 5,1100.00 50.00 2.50 Ho -1210 I Interl0[ Nemodal AC Ford Opl lCel/107 110[1% Nelnut St.- 5,000.00 50.00 2.50 1tl6-1]11 I house s Gareg• 16Y Oeve KI 11 Cunat./111 Aevin 1-911y Orlve I 75.900.00 477.91 37.95 25.00 .50 OU -1712 Ga[a9e Ilool All I Rlcherd L 7'errl Lumley/1500 Nool Pl ver St. 1.900.00 19.00 .95 1BU-1711 Ilouleeo Ge[eg1 Naehln9le AU I Palr10 111an19nn/120 Rlvarvlov Urlva 1,500.00 15.00 .SO 1110-1211 1 ^u n P-th All I Charles L Ce101 LLert/2001 ped Oek Lena 1,500.00 IS.00 SU 811-17.11 Interlol tles.mant Yln[eh AU I ❑e vld 11roullle['d/1120 Meat plvlr GT[1at I,SO0 00 15.00 .50 IIU-1714 Gn[e9s I RG IJeek Mevve 11/119 Rl vervlav Ih lvA I 36.000.00 323.50 10.00 I IBS -1217 Pump Ilouoe I C I [I" of 1lonticello/705 Cheleee Roed 727,400.00 I,Otl4. lU 113.80 26.0, .50 TOTALS if ! 604,100.00 1,735.13 300.95 170.00 2.50 PLANS nLV1EN 011-1131 loo-, L Ge1e4. ur I Ila rvin L Ohlrlly Sttev/007 At- BI. 57.90 I 0.-1737 Illou ea L Get eye DY I lleyla Vlehee Con.l./711 Me rvin r.lvood 4-411.7] I �b0-1771 I Mous• L l:et Ay. 1 OY I C L 0 fonat./501 Mlnue.ols 0l rnmt 17. ID I all- I2?tl (Goll Celt 111,119, Ilulldln0 G IMontloallu Country Club/1209 Golf Course Ddl DL.07 , IOU -1711 Illouse L G..... 6Y l4 va Y.laln [O,1et•/11] E1vin lanpl.y Ilrlvs 4).79 IUU-11.7 I Pump Ilou.s IClty of MonIICeIlO/205 C1lelsom Pont! 705.96 1 IJ IC PIAN DY I TOTAL EVIL S 979.119 TOTAL REVENUE 1 S, ILb. 47