Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 04-09-1990AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL Monday, April 9, 1990 - 7:00 p.m. Mayor: Ken Maus Council Members: Fran Fair, Shirley Anderson, Warren Smith, Dan Blonigen 1. Call to order. 2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held March 26, 1990. 3. Citizens comments/ petitions, requests, and complaints. 4. Public hearing and consideration to adopt a resolution relating to the modification by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Monticello of the redevelopment plan relating to Redevelopment Project No. 1, the modification of the tax increment financing plans relating to Tax Increment Financing District Nos. 1-1 through 1-9, and the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District 1-10, all located within Redevelopment Project No. 1, and the approval and adoption of the tax increment financing plan relating thereto. 1, 5. Consideration of approving preliminary and final plat--Remmele Addition. 5a. Public hearing - Consideration of vacation of Fallon Avenue between Chelsea Road and I-94 and consideration of vacation of utility casements. 6. Consideration of a conditional use request to allow a car wash in a PZM (performance zone mixed) zone. Applicant, Dean Hoglund and Ken Schwartz. 7. Consideration of a resolution approving plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids --Meadows Second Addition, phase II. B. Consideration of a resolution establishing Minnesota Earth Day 1990. 9. Consideration of adopting personnel policy and procedural manual. 10. Consideration of ratifying library board appointment. 11. Consideration of turn back or sale of excess right-of-way along the sorvice drive of East County Road 39. Council Agenda April 9, 1990 Page 2 12. Consideration of shelter for Ellison Park. 13. Consideration of ordinance amendment --public nuisance. 14. Update on hiring City Inspector. 15. Adjournment. C MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, March 26, 1990 - 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Ken Maus, Fran Fair, Warren Smith, Shirley Anderson, Dan Blonigen Members Absent: None 2. Approval of minutes. Motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Dan Blonigen, to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held March 12, 1990. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints. Betty Held of "Opening Doors" was present to promote Disability Awareness Week. Mayor Maus read a proclamation proclaiming the week of April 22 to April 28 as Disability Awareness Week in Monticello. 4. Public hearing and consideration to affirm the modification of Redevelopment Plan #1, modification of TIF Redeveloement District Plan Nos. 1-1 throuqh 1-8, and establishment of TIF Districts 1-9 and 1-11, and to affirm the approval and adoption of the TIF plans relatinq thereto. Motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to continue the public hearing to the next meeting of the City Council. Motion carried unanimously. 5. Public hearinq relatinq to the modification of Redevelopment Plan No. i, modification of TIF Redevelopment Plan Nos. 1-i throuqh 1-9, and establishment of TIF District No. 1-10, and the approval and adoption of the TIF plan relatinq thereto. Motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by Dan Blonigen, to continue the public hearing to the next meeting of the City Council. Motion carried unanimously. 6. Public hearing (continued) - Consideration of vacation of Fallon Avenue between Chelsea Road and I-94 and consideration of vacation of utilitv easements. Motion was made by Dan Blonigen, seconded by Warren Smith, to continuo this item to the next meeting of the City Council, Motion carried unanimously. Pago 1 I Council Minutes - 3/26/90 Public hearing (continued) - Consideration of resolution approving development plan and TIF plan for TIF District No. 1-1 (The Lincoln Companies/K-Mart). After discussion, motion was made by and seconded by to adopt a resolution approving development program and TIF plan for City TIF District No. 1-1 (The Lincoln Companies/K-Mart). SEE RESOLUTION 90-11. Consideration of adoptinq developer's agreement between the City of Monticello and The Lincoln Companies. Assistant Administrator O'Neill reviewed the developer agreement between the developers of the K -Mart project and the City of Monticello. In addition, Bob Dieke of Homes b Graven reviewed the document in some detail. Fran Fair noted that under this particular TIF program, the TIF revenue is being used to create a road alignment that is in the best interest of the City of Monticello. In addition, the revenue is not subsidizing any of the developers' direct expenses. After discussion, motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Warren Smith, to adopt the contract for private redevelopment by and between the City of Monticello and Monticello K.M. Limited Partnership subject to final review of project financing documentation. Motion carried unanimously. i. Consideration of purchase of land necessary for the 7th Street aliqnment--Tom Holthaus property. After discussion, motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to purchase the Holthaus property for the sum of $56,000. Motion carried unanimously. 10. Consideration of resolution acceptinq feasibility study; consider adoptinq developer agreement, and consider ordering plans and apecifications--Moadows and the Meadows 2nd Addition, phase II. Assistant Administrator O'Neill reviewed the feasibility study and reviewed the proposed terms and agreements contained in the development agreement. O'Neill noted that the developer agreement proposes a combination of two strategies for increasing the security of the City's investment in this project. Page 2 Council Minutes - 3/26/40 For every lot that is sold, the developers will pay an amount equal to the assessment amount against two lots. The total assessment will be repaid at such time that 1 of the 14 lots are sold. In the event that the annual assessment is unpaid, a letter of credit will be available for draw by the City. The letter of credit is in an amount equal to 1/3 of the total assessment amount. Tom Holthaus and Matt Holker were in attendance and noted that they support the development agreement. After discussion, motion was made by Dan Slonigen, seconded by Warren Smith, to adopt the resolution accepting the feasibility study, adopt the developer agreement, and order plans and specifications for the Meadows and Meadows 2nd Addition phase II. Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 90-12. ii. Consideration of an ordinance amendment --public nuisances. Administrator Woifsteller reviewed the proposed amendment to the public nuisance ordinance. Wolfsteller noted that the amendment further defined cars, trucks, and station wagons, along with other vehicles, as to when they would be considered a public nuisance. He noted that another provision allows a property owner who has a vehicle stored for more than 30 days to petition the City Council for an extension of the time limit due to extenuating circumstances. Under the proposed ordinance, the vehicle would be considered a public nuisance If: 1) it is not currently licensed and it is not running; 2) it is currently licensed but not running if stored outside for more than 30 days; 3) it is not licensed but running if stored outside for more than 30 days. Dan 0lonigen noted his concerns regarding tho enforcement of this ordinance. It was his concern that the language is vague and that there is a potential that the City might force it in an arbitrary manner and that the law will not be applied equally throughout the city. Slonigen also noted that there are already too many ordinances and that Monticello is clean. Pago 3 l Council Minutes - 3/26/90 Ken Maus stated that it is his view that the ordinance is necessary and that abandoned vehicles is a problem in the community. Shirley Anderson asked how this legislation impacts recreation vehicles. Rick Wolfsteller noted that if they are licensed and running, recreation vehicles would not be affected by the ordinance; however, recreation vehicles that are unlicensed and not running would not be allowed to be stored outside. Rhonda Thielen was in attendance. Thielen noted that the public nuisance related problems are city wide and not specific to only certain neighborhoods. warren Smith noted that the ordinance is relatively restrictive and may create some problems. At the same time, he also realizes the greater goal of the ordinance, which is to clean up a public nuisance problem. After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Fran Fair, to approve the ordinance amendment as proposed. Voting in favor: Shirley Anderson, Fran Fair, Warren Smith, Ken Maus. Abstaining/opposed: Dan Blonigen. SEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 184. 12. Consideration of ordinance to reoulate cigarette vendinq machines. Administrator Wolfsteller noted that the state Icgislature is considering legislation that would affect the operation of cigarette vending machines in the state of Minnesota; therefore, it may make sense at this time to continue this matter until the legislative session has ended. After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Fran Fair, to table this matter until after the legislative session. Motion carried unanimously. 13. Consideration of change order 01 for Project 90-1, booster oumn refurbishment at the water reservoir on Chelsea Road. After discussion, motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to approve chango order M1 from E.N. Renner 6 Sons in a credit amount of $10,000, which is a 28.39 savings on the overall project. Motion carriod unanimously. Page 4 Council Minutes - 3126/90 14. Consideration of refurbishment of well #2. After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Dan Blonigen, to have E.H. Renner a Sons complete the remaining pump refurbishment at a cost of $3,284 and have Olson Electric s Sons change out the motor control center for a 100 hp capability and include a 100 hp soft start wire to operate a 75 hp motor at a cost of $9,568. Motion carried unanimously. 15. Consideration of providinq safetv switchino for variable speed Dump drive at the wastewater treatment plant. John Simola explained that after the installation of a variable speed drive, the City personnel operating the wastewater treatment plant thought it would be beneficial to have the variable speed drive capable of being switched to another 15 hp pump in case of failure of the first pump; therefore, they went ahead and made what they thought were appropriate wiring changes at the wastewater treatment plant. Unfortunately, what they built into the system at that time was an electrical safety problem. The switching from one pump to another required a systematic throwing of switches and adjusting of motor starters. If the starters were thrown in the wrong sequence or one switch wasn't locked out, the variable speed drive would be fed backwards with 480 volts. This occurred the second week of February. Luckily, no one was injured; but the variable speed drive or variable frequency drive, as it is often referred to, was essentially destroyed. In response to this problem, Simola recommended that the City pick up the $2,600 rewiring cost. He noted that had we been aware that this hazard existed, we would have rectified it immediately. In addition, it was Simola's view that this would be an opportune time to purchase a unit capable of running 25 hp pumps. As flow to the plant increases, we may find it necessary to drive one of the larger pumps. Warren Smith asked if it is necessary to buy the equipment capable of running larger pumps at this time. what sort of increased demand would bring about the need for use of the larger pumps? Simola explained that the development of a single large industrial user of water or the development of the Kjellberg Evergreens development would create sufficient need for the use of the larger pumps. Warren Smith noted that both parties appear to be somewhat at fault with regard to this problem and that both should share in the expense associated with repairing the damaged circuitry. Page 5 Council Minutes - 3/26/90 After discussion, motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to authorize the City to pay for the $2,600 electrical wiring and authorize PSG to install the 25 hp ABB unit with PSG picking up $2,600 and the City picking up $1,200. Motion carried unanimously. 16. Consideration of shelter for Ellison Park. After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Warren Smith, to schedule a special meeting of the City Council for 6:30 p.m., April 10, 1990, to discuss the designs of a potential shelter for Ellison Park. Motion carried unanimously. 17. Consideration of adoptinq personnel policv and procedural manual. A general discussion of the manual ensued. Major portions of the document were reviewed. Three changes were made to the proposed personnel policy. Ken Maus suggested that the 20 - minute coffee break be reduced to a 15 -minute break. It was also suggested that the retirement age be changed from 70 years of age to 65 years of age, and the vacation time of 24 days for 20+ years of service be deleted. After discussion, motion was made by Dan Blonigen, seconded by Fran Fair, to modify the personnel policy as proposed and resubmit the document for further review. Motion carried unanimously. 18. Consideration of hirinq full-time municipal construction inspector. Motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Fran Fair, to continue this item until the next meeting of the City Council, as staff is not ready at this time to make a recommendation regarding which candidate to hire for the position. Motion carried unanimously. Council was informed that Tony Strando has resigned and taken a position with the City of Becker. Aftor discussion, motion was made by Warren Smith, secondod by Fran Fair, to authorize City staff to soak applicants for this position. Motion carried unanimously. Page 6 Council Minutes - 3/26/90 At this point in the meeting, citizens residing within Balboul Estates, Anders Wilhelm Estates, and the Meadows development reviewed public nuisance related problems within their neighborhoods. Vicki Schluender showed a video which revealed evidence of the junk cars, debris, and other nuisance items. Ken Maus noted that this is an ongoing problem that the City has worked hard to resolve. He noted that some of the violators have received numerous letters and have been subject to court action, yet the problem with these individuals continues. Citizens in the neighborhood noted their frustration that despite City efforts, the problem does not appear to be resolved. Maus also noted that the new ordinance will provide a 10 -day notice rather than a 14 -day notice of a violation and that after 10 days if the problem is not corrected, the violator will receive a ticket. A first offense is a petty misdemeanor, and a second offense is a misdemeanor. Fran Fair stated that the City is tightening the ordinance ir a manner that will hopefully streamline the enforcement procedure and correct problems more quickly. She noted that the citizens concerned should write letters to the County Attorney and to district judges emphasizing the problem in the area. Doing so would encourage timely completion of the enforcement process. Ken Maus reiterated that the City will attempt to do everything it legally can to solve the problem; but he went on to note that the City does not have all the answers and that to a large extent, the problem in the area is a people problem that the City may have limited capability to resolve. After discussion, Ken Maus suggested that the noighborhood group reconvene in a week to discuss this matter in detail. Assistant Administrator O'Neill noted that he would invite leaders of various organizations that might be part of a solution to the problems noted. A meeting was scheduled for 6:30 p.m., April 2, 1990. 19. Consideration of authorizing establishment of Citv Management/Planning Intern position. Assistant Administrator O'Neill outlined his currant list of projects and requested that Council consider establishment of a City Management/Planning Intern position. Page 7 Council Minutes - 3/26/90 Shirley Anderson noted that she would prefer to see some of the activities on the list removed rather than hire an intern. Dan Blonigen concurred with this view. Ken Maus suggested that a detailed intern work plan be prepared for his review. Warren Smith noted that hiring an intern is an inexpensive way to get certain jobs done. After discussion, motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Warren Smith, to explore establishment of a City Management/ Planning Intern position with Ken Maus reviewing work plan prior to hiring of intern. Voting in favor: Warren Smith, Fran Fair, Ken Maus. Opposed: Dan Blonigen, Shirley Anderson. 20. Consideration of bills for the month of March.. Motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by Dan Blonigen, to approve the bills as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. Jeff O'Neill Assistant Administrator Pago 8 f a� Council Agenda - 4/9/90 Public hearing and consideration to adopt a resolution relating to the modification by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Monticello of the redevelopment plan relatinq to Redevelopment Project No. 1, the modification of the tax increment financing plans relating to Tax Increment Financinq District Nos. 1-1 throuqh 1-9, and the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District 1-10, all located within Redevelopment Project No. 1, and the approval and adoption of the tax increment financinq plan relating thereto. (O.K.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council adopted a resolution calling for a public hearing for Tax Increment Finance District No. 1-10 (Remmele Engineering, Inc.) on February 26. The public hearing was continued from March 12 to March 26 and was again continued from March 26 to April 9. As Mr. Tom Pantalion, Attorney at Dorsey 6 Whitney, now expects the purchase option or purchase agreement to be secured from Jim Boyle prior to Monday night, Council may now close the public hearing and consider adoption of the TIF plan. The Council should be aware of one change in the Remmele TIF district. Originally, this TIF district was to be established as a redevelopment district and now will be established as an economic district as recommended by Mr. Bob Deike of Holmes 6 Graven, the City's bond counsel. In Mr. Doike's opinion, the district did not moot current statutory qualifications for the establishment of a redevelopment district. Current statutory qualifications to establish a redevolopment district state that 70% of the parcels in the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, or other improvements, and 20% of the buildings are structurally substandard (there are no buildings on this parcel). Nor can he justifiably determine the street, utilities, or other improvements to be structurally substandard to a degree of requiring removal. Thirdly is his concern with legislators' intent to further tighten the qualifications for establishment of redevelopment districts. What is the impact of the change? An economic district has a lessor impact on a community than a redevelopment district; therefore, there Is no need to republicizo the notice, and the taxing jurisdictions will be notified of the change upon adoption of the TIF district and plan. Secondly, the duration of the district is roducod from 25 years to 10 years. The upfront assistance to Remmolo Engineering was based on increment generated over eight years; however, staff had anticipated the additional increment collected over the remaining 15 years would assist in costa to roconstruct the Council Agenda - 4/9/90 realigned Fallon Avenue, purchase the small triangle piece to the south of Chelsea Road, and to replenish the HRA general fund for future projects. The actual reconstruction of Fallon Avenue and/or the construction of a bridge across I-94 is highly unlikely to occur for another several years. Financing of these public improvements may be through another TIF project, through assessment, or through the increased increment generated by projected expansion within this district. The HRA will modify the TIF plan prior to Council's meeting. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Close the public hearing and adopt the resolution relating to the modification and establishment of TIF District No. 1-10 and approving and adopting the TIF plan relating thereto. 2. Close the public hearing and deny adoption of the resolution. 3. Continue the public hearing until April 23, 1990. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation is to adopt the resolution. Adoption is recommended because the district meets the qualification of an economic district. The project will increase the community's tax base, will create skilled jobs, and Remmele Engineering is a high quality manufacturing company. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the original TIF budget; Copy of modified resolution will be presented by Business Development Services at the Council meeting. ouv 2 Tax Increment Financinq District No. 1-10 (As adopted March 12, 1990) BUDGET PHASE I PHASE II Land Acquisition $120,000 0 On -Site Utilities/Grading/ 65,000 0 Landscaping Public Improvements 0 $ 55,000 Soils Corrections 0 0 Subtotal $185,000 $ 55,000 Contingency 0 0 Administration 15,000 10,000 Professional Services 10,000 5,000 Subtotal $210,000 $ 70,000 Capitalized Interest 47,000 14,000 Discount 3,000 11000 $260,000 $ 85,000 It is anticipated that Phase I will proceed at the commencement of the project and Phase II will proceed as additional increment becomes available through future development. (As adopted November, 1982) Subsection 1.11. Land Use. All new and/or existing development on land identified on Exhibits I -C through I -P as •property to be acquired" or 'possible acquisition' will be subject to the following uses and requirements: 1. Uses Permitted in Designated Areas. a. Industrial --All permitted, accessory and conditional uses as specified in Chapters 15 and 16, Monticello Zoning Ordinance, relating to I-1 (Light Industry) and I-2 (Heavy Industry) zones. Planned Unit Developments, where applicable, will be considered. b. Housinq/Residential--All permitted, accessory and con- ditionai uses as specified in Chapters 8 and 10, Monticello Zoning Ordinate, relating to R-3 (Medium Density Residential) and R -B (Residential -Business) zones. Planned Unit Developments, where feasible, will be encouraged. c. Downtown/Commercial--All permitted, accessory, and con- ditional uses in accordance with the provisions governing all 18' zones and including R -B, providing however that any commercial development in an R -B zone shall be coordinated with the goals and objectives of the Housing Plan. Planned Unit Developments, especially in the 8-3 zone (Highway Business), will be encouraged. 1-28 t. , Council Agenda - 4/9/90 5. Consideration of approving preliminary and final plat--Remmele Addition. AND 5a. Public Hearinq - Consideration of vacation of Fallon Avenue between Chelsea Road and I-94 and consideration of vacation of. utility easements. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: At the March 12 Council meeting, the Council tabled action on the above two items to allow more time for Remmele Engineering to acquire the necessary property for their TIF project. Word has been received from Remmele's attorneys that they feel comfortable that an option will be acquired by Monday night from Mr. Boyle/Farm Credit on the remaining parcel of land needed for the tax increment financing project. If they are not able to obtain the necessary option papers by Monday night, the Council will be asked to continue the public hearing and table any action on the preliminary or final plat until the next meeting. Enclosed you will find copies of the agenda supplements dated March 12 pertaining to these two agenda items, and the staff can answer any additional questions you may have in regard to the previous information. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: The alternatives remain the same as listed in the March 12 agenda supplements attached. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copies of agenda supplements dated March 12. l/ 40 V J c� 3 Council Agenda - 3/12/90 2. Public Hearinq - Consideration of Vacation of Fallon Avenue between Chelsea Rd and I-94 and consideration of Vacation of utility easeaments. (J.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Council is asked to conduct a public hearing on the proposed vacation of roadway and easement areas that were in place prior to the development of the Remmele plat. The Remmele Plat proposes the development of a buildable industrial lot over the existing Fallon Avenue right of way. In exchange for City action to vacate this ROW, Remmele has agreed to purchase and deed to the City, land necessary to replace the Fallon Right of Way. In addition, an assortment of Misc. utility easements must also be vacated thereby paving the way for new easements associated with the Remmele Plat. If Council desires to adopt the Remmele Plat, then the street and utility vacations should be approved. Please note that the Plat should be approved prior to vacation of the ROW and easements. If for some reason the Remmele Plat is not approved, then the decision regarding this matter should be tabled until matters are resolved. B. ALTERNATIVES 1. Motion to approve resolution calling for the vacation of Fallon Avenue Right of way between Chelsea and I-94 and approve vacation of associated utility easements. This alternative should be selected only if the Plat is validated by the proper signatures and ready to be recorded. If the Plat does not contain valid signatures by meeting time, then the matter should bo tabled. 2. Motion to deny approval of resolution calling for the vacation of Fallon Avenuo Right of way between Cholsea and 1-94 and approve vacation of associated utility easements. This option should be selocted if Council elects to deny approval of the Remmolo Subdivision. C. RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommends alternative 1. I Af¢,0.s A EXCEPTION •ti l No,rn ane of U.' V4 1�. �� •�" � Ce,ne,d Seaan u•i7•iJ �ia, r.14 / o/ Set.,a, 7114 AIJ seeso'm'a •. I- � seg l <<-ter � r•�r�e to � J l r`) ' 0 1 ' �,p , ••l1T 3W.11 i ; ' c•ra•ts�� toe.. •Y', j / J �~ •a ra �a, �. , ro II• (n 1, I n,l ,or n-. A. i Ij Council Agenda - 3/12/90 Consideration of approvinq preliminary and final plat - Remmele Addition. (J.0) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND At the Meeting of the Planning Commission held on March 6, 1990, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and considered this matter. Planning Commission recommended that the preliminary plat be approved without changes. If Council approves the plat without changes, then it can act to give preliminary and final approval to the plat. Staff has reviewed the plat and found all easements to be in place. In addition, the Plat calls for the relocation of the Fallon Avenue Right of way to a location along the east side of the Remmele building site created by this plat. Relocation of this right of way benefits the City because it creates potential for a less expensive, perpendicular crossing of I- 94. In addition, the existing or "old" Fallon Avenue is only 66 feet wide, the new Fallon Avenue will be 80' wide. The added width is needed if this roadway is developed as a freeway crossing. The new right of way will be deeded to the City by Remmele as an outlet. The plat also calls for a slight realignment or curvature of Fallon Avenue which will allow Fallon Avenue South of Chelsea to line-up with the new alignment north of Fallon Avenue. In order to create the realignment, the City must purchase a small portion of property as noted on the attached plan. Remmele is spearheading the effort to purchase all necessary lands east of Fallon Avenue including the small piece that the City needs. Once Remmele completes acquisition, the City will simply purchase the area it needs from Remmele. Unfortunately, there are complications associated with Remmele acquisition of property once fully controlled by Jim Boyle. Due to a default situation, the status of the ownership and or control of the property is somewhat unclear. Remmelo's attorney's aro working diligently on this matter and hope to obtain the necessary property in short order. Further development of the Remmole project hingos on acquisition of land oast of Chelsea. The Plat does not become recordable until the signatures of the owners of all lands affected by the plat are affixed to the Plat. Similarly, the TIF plan can not be adopted until the lot lines noted on the Remmole plat become official. Council Agenda - 3/12/90 B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to approve preliminary and final plat of the Remmele Addition subject to placement of proper signatures on the plat. The proposed plat meets the City requirements in terms of necessary drainage and utility easements. In addition, it complies with City subdivision requirments. Therefore it appears that the Remmele Addition should be approved. Under this alternative Council would provide approval of the plat, however the plat would not be allowed to be recorded until the proper signatures are on the plat. Approving the plat with conditions allows this item to proceed without bringing it back before Council when the proper signatures are in place. 2. Motion to table matter. Council may wish to wait for the proper signatures to be on the the Plat prior to approval. This option would require the matter come before Council at a subsequent meeting. It may make sense to table the matter because approving the plat now may not substantially facilitate the development. This is because Council must table consideration of. the REMMELE/TIF issue until the March 26, 1990 meeting. Council could give final approval of the Plat at that time. 3. Motion to table approval of Preliminary and Final Plat - Remmele Addition pending Plat modifications. It appears at this time that the Remmele Addition plat is in final form. If however, it is discovered that the Plat should be modified in some manner, then Council may wish to table approval until the modifications aro made. C. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends alternative 2. D. SUPPORTING DATA Copy of Rommole Addition Plat. L) Cd rREMMELE ADDITION VV o 0o�j 1 � t Y� I F +,�•., °° I Yom....::: +` ' • • . r i1 ° Jt o o o v I I, ; is • •�`\� �0 0 �a•1 ..'n °J 7 ip C T w',' • • i. p• C Council Agenda - 4/9/90 Consideration of a conditional use request to allow a car wash in a PZM leerformance zone mixed) zone. ACPlicant, Dean Hoqlund and Ken Schwartz. (J.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Ken Schwartz and Dean Hoglund have submitted a request for a conditional use permit which would allow operation of a car wash facility in the PZM zone at Block 1, Lot 4, MacArlund Plaza. The site is located directly next to the existing Riverroad Plaza. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this matter and recommends that the conditional use permit be approved subject to the conditions listed under alternative Al below. As you recall, In late fall of 1989, the City Council created an amendment which allowed the establishment of car washes in the PZM zone. Although the development site is in the same area, this particular application is not related to the proposal submitted to the City Council last year. Following is a brief review of the site plan. The car wash facility proposed consists of a single automatic bay and three self-service bays. Vehicle stacking and vacuum cleaning of vehicles will occur on the side of the structure facing the major highway. Vehicles exiting the wash bays will do so through the rear and will circulate around the structure and out on the main frontage road. To the north of the site is an apartment complex. Garages associated with the apartment are located along a portion of the rear lot line making an excellent buffer between the residential and business use. It is proposed that trees and/ or an opaque fence be installed along that portion of the property that is not screened by the existing garages. To the west of the development site is more PZM property which will likely be the site of continued commercial development. In reviewing the conditional use permit application, City Council, as always, needs to evaluate the request in terms of the impact of the development on the adjoining properties in terms of qeography and character of the adjoining areas. In addition, the City Council needs to consider the impact of the development on the property values of the adjoining properties. 11 Council Agenda - 4/9/90 It appears that the development as proposed complies with the conditional use permit conditions noted by ordinance. City Council should note, however, that the side yard setback for the east wall of the structure calls for a 6 -foot setback. This would put any roof overhang or footing into the 6 -foot drainage and utility easement. According to the zoning ordinance, there are no established setback requirements in the PZM zone, as the regulations associated with the zone are designed to be somewhat flexible. Normally, however, the flexibility provides the City Council with the ability to require a greater setback. For comparison purposes, City Council should know that the normal setback associated with a car wash in the B-3 zone is a 10 -foot side yard setback. At the same time, however, there is an existing 10 -foot setback between the Riverroad Plaza and the side lot line. This distance of 10 feet combined with the proposed 6 -foot setback may provide a distance between structures that may be sufficient. If this is sufficient, our setbacks in a B-3 may be too restrictive and should be looked into. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to approve the conditional use permit as requested subject to the conditions noted in 10-8 (k) with the addition of any other conditions suggested by the Planning Commission and any other conditions that the City Council or staff might wish to add. Motion based on the finding that the development is consistent with the geography and character, otc., of the area. CONDITIONS: The architectural appearance and functional plan of the building and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing buildings or area as to cause Impairment in property values or constitute a blighting influence within a reasonable distance of the lot. 2. Magazining or stacking space is constructed to accommodate that number of vehicles which can be washed during a maximum thirty (30) minute period and shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 3. At the boundaries of a residential district, a strip of not less than five (5) foot shall be landscaped and screened in compliance with Chapter 3, Section 2 (G), of this ordinance. -uv Council Agenda - 4/9/90 4. Each light standard island and all islands in the parking lot landscaped or covered. 5. Parking or car magazine storage space shall be screened from view of abutting residential districts in compliance with Chapter 3, Section 2 [G], of this ordinance. 6. The entire area other than occupied by the buildings or plantings shall be surfaced with material which will control dust and drainage which is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 7. The entire area shall have a drainage system which is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 8. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source is not visible from the public right-of-way or from an abutting residence and shall be in compliance with Chapter 3, Section 2 [H], of this ordinance. 9. Vehicular access points shall be limited, shall create a minimum of conflict with through traffic movement, and shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 10. All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be in compliance with Chapter 3, Section 9, of this ordinance. 11. Provisions are made to control and reduce noise. 12. The provisions of Chapter 22 of this ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met. 13. Car wash facility shall have direct access to major thoroughfare via driveway or frontage road. 14. Intermittent sounds produced by car wash operation such as the sound of a vacuum or warning signal shall not be audible to users of adjoining PZM or residential properties. Conditions suggested by the Planning Commission in addition to ordinance defined conditions above: 15. Carwash bay doors facing residential areas must be closed during all car wash phases. G Council Agenda - 4/9/90 16. Hours of operation shall fall within the hours of 6:00 AM to 10:00 PM. 17. A screening fence and/or landscape plantings shall be established in the area between the end of the existing garage and the corner of the property in a manner that will properly screen the car wash activity from the residential area. Staff to work with developer toward finalizing the screening requirement. 18. A parking island delineator shall be installed in conjunction with the future commercial development of the adjoining parcel to the west of the car wash site. In the interim, a fence shall be installed along the property line, thereby eliminating access to the adjoining parcel. 2. Motion to deny approval of the conditional use permit as requested based on the finding that the development as proposed is not consistent with the character or geography of the adjoining area and that allowing development of this structure with a 6 -foot side yard setback will create a problem and also establish a poor precedent. The applicants have shown a willingness to comply with all reasonable conditions associated with the conditional use permit. One request they have not been able to comply with is to provide a 10 -foot setback between the east wall and the property line. If City Council views this as a problem, then this could be grounds for denial of the conditional use permit. On the other hand, the setbacks associated with the PZM zone aro not defined; therefore, the City Council does have some leeway in terms of determining proper setbacks in the PZM zone on a case by case basis. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission and staff recommend approval of the conditional use permit so long as applicants are able to successfully fulfill the conditions as noted by ordinance. It was the view of the Planning Commission that the 6 -foot setback provides for a sufficient distance between the Riverroad Plaza structure and the car wash facility. Staff is somewhat concerned with the 6 -foot setback, howover, and the operation of the car wash is not that well understood; Council Agenda - 4/9/90 therefore, it might be wise to withhold final approval of the conditional use permit until the noise level created by the automatic and manual car wash is better understood. We need to make sure that the apartments nearby are not negatively Impacted by the operation. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the site plan. C 61 I a; X I myr. I I b .19 . Po* IIL-1116 Council Agenda - 4!9190 7. Consideration of a resolution approvinq plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids --Meadows Second Addition, phase II. (J.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Council is asked to consider a resolution accepting the plans and specifications and also to consider authorization to proceed with the advertisement for bids process. The Public Works Director is reviewing the plans and will be making any suggested changes to the plans prior to plan adoption. if Council has no change in position regarding the development of the utilities as a public improvement project, then Council should proceed to adopt said resolution. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt the resolution accepting plans and specifications and authorizing bid advertisement. 2. Motion to deny adoption of said resolution. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of resolution for adoption. If Council so wishes, a copy of the plans and specifications are available for your review. 9 RESOLUTION 90 - RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the Council on March 26, 1990, the City Engineer, Orr-Schelen-Mayeron 6 Associates, has prepared plans and specifications for the improvement of Crocus Lane and Crocus Circle within the Meadows 2nd Addition with sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer, bituminous streets, curb and gutter, and appurtenant work, and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file at City Hall, are hereby approved. 2. The City Administrator shall prepare and cause to be inserted In the Monticello Times and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for 21 days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the Administrator until /100 a.m. on1op1/ , 1990, at which time they will be publicly ened In the Council Chambers of the City Hall by the City Administrator and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 7:30 p.m. on %i19/�Ll /U 1990, in the Council Chambers. No bids w1I1 be considered unless sealed and filed with the Administrator and accumpanied by a cash deposit, cashier's chock, bid bond, or cortified chock payable to the City of Monticello for 5% of the amount of such bid. 3. Springstod, Inc., is hereby designated the financial consultant for the financing of this public improvement. Adopted this 9th day of April, 1990. Mayor City Administrator 0 Council Agenda - 4/9/90 B. Consideration of a resolution establishina Minnesota Earth Day 1990. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: An advisory committee has been established, composed of leaders from business, environmental, and governmental organizations, whose purpose is to help design a series of activities and events that will increase the public awareness of environmental problems and the ways to resolve these problems. As part of the establishment of Minnesota Earth Day 1990, local government agencies are asked to pass a resolution supporting the establishment of Minnesota Earth Day 1990 as April 22, 1990. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Adopt a resolution proclaiming April 22, 1990, as Minnesota Earth Day. 2. Do not adopt the resolution supporting this. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Mayor and Council adopt the resolution supporting the efforts of Minnesota Earth Day 1990. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of resolution. L U 10 RESOLUTION 90 - WHEREAS, almost twenty years ago, more than twenty million Americans joined together on Earth Day in demonstration of concern for the environment, and their collective action resulted in the passage of sweeping new laws to protect our air, water, and land; WHEREAS, in the nineteen years since the first Earth Day, despite environmental improvements, the environmental health of the planet is increasingly endangered, threatened by global climate change, ozone depletion, growing world population, tropical deforestation, ocean pollution, toxic wastes, desertification, and nuclear waste requiring action by all sectors of society; WHEREAS, Earth Day 1990 is a national and international call to action for all citizens to join In a global effort to save the planet; WHEREAS, Earth Day 1990 activities and events will educate all citizens on the importance of acting in an environmentally sensitive fashion by recycling, conserving energy and water, using efficient transportation, and adopting more ecologically sound lifestyles; WHEREAS, Earth Day 1990 will educate all citizens on the importance of buying and using those products least harmful to the environment; WHEREAS, Earth Day 1990 will educate all citizens on the Importance of doing business with companies that are environmentally sensitive and responsible; WHEREAS, Earth Day 1990 will educate all citizens on the Importance of voting for those candidates who demonstrate an abiding concern for the environment; WHEREAS, Earth Day 1990 will educate all citizens on the importance of supporting the passage of legislation that will help protect the environment; NOW, THEREFORE, 13E IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY OF MONTICELLO designates and proclaims April 22, 1990, as Earth Day 1990, and that that day shall be set aside for public acLlvltles promoting prosorvatlon of the global environment and launching the "Decade of the Environment." Adopted this 9th day of April, 1990. Mayor CCity Administrator (3d �� ➢ " EARTH DAY 1990 P.O. Box 10329: Minneapolis. Minnesota 55458.3329 (612) 627-4049 Earth Day Co-chairs Resolution Committee Co-chalrs Governor Rudy Perplch Attorney Gen. Hubert H. Humphry III Senator David Durenberger U. S. Congressman Vin Weber February 21. 1990 Dear Minnesota Mayor: Earth Day 1990 presents a unique opportunity to focus public attention on resolving our environmental problems. The Minnesota Earth Day 1990 Advisory Committee. composed of leaders from business. environmental and government organizations. Is helping to design a series of activities and events (lint will Increase public understanding of environmental problems and the ways these problems can be resolved. l _ One of the guiding principles of Earth Day 1990 is Inclusiveness. Regardless of what city. stale or nation we -reside in. we all share planet Earlb as our home. The goal of Earth Day 1990 Is to raise the level of public awareness about our environment and to educate people about actions they can lake on behalf of the environment. Earth Day 1990 is the ultimate expression of the phrase 'think globally: net locally". Earth Day 1990 will be the product of n huge coalition of loosely affiliated organtzalions. reaching far beyond existing environmental constituencies to involve the broadest possible cross section of participants. Around the world. across America. and here in Minnesota. individuals and groups are already planning activities and events to celebrate Earth Day. As co -chairpersons of the Minnesota Earth Day 1990 Resolutions Committee. we urge you to Join elected officials In local )urLsdictions ncross America in passing resolutions like the sample resolution enclosed with this letter. With your help we can demonstrate why Minnesota is recognized as an environmental leader among the stales. Finally. after your organization tins passed the resolution. we request that you send o copy to us in care of Minnesota Earth Day 1990. P.O. Box 10329. Mimunpnits. MN 55458.3329. On behalf or Minnesota Earth Day 1990. we would like to thank you for your help in making Earth Day In Minnesota a great successl 1\Sincerely. `\ IIUBERT 11. HUMPHREY. III Attorney General r Enc. VNB) r U. S. Congressman Council Agenda - 4/9/90 9. Consideration of adoptino personnel policy and procedural manual. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Based on Council review of the personnel policy and procedural manual at the last Council meeting, changes were made within the policy concerning three areas as follows: Item #9, lunch and rest periods. The provision calling for a 20 -minute rest period was changed to 15 minutes. 2. vacation schedule. The 24 days for 20+ years of service was deleted and re -worded to indicate 15+ years would receive 20 days per year maximum. 3. Item #15, retirement. This was changed to indicate that it was the City's policy that all full-time employees be required to retire upon reaching the age of 65 rather than 70. These were the only three areas that were changed based on the previous discussion; and unless the Council has any further changes they would like to see made, this procedural manual could be adopted. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Adopt the new personnel policy and procedural manual as modified. 2. Adopt the personnel policy as modified, including any additional revisions so desired. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: I believe the personnel policy as modified is a sound document that should be considered by the Council for adoption. I believe this now policy will bettor define some areas that have been of concern by the staff and will provide the basic document for interpreting personnel policies and procedures. Even with the adoption of this policy, I anticipate that annually the policy will be reviewed and possibly recommendations will be made to the Council for changes that are appropriate. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the pages with the amendments underlined. Please replace those pages with the document previously sent to you. m IX. LUNCH AND REST PERIODS 1. All full-time employees' work schedules shall provide for a paid fifteen (15) minute rest period during each one-half (1/2) shift. The rest periods shall be scheduled by the supervisor at the middle of each one-half (1/2) shift whenever this is feasible. Such rest periods shall be limited to a maximum of fifteen (15) minutes off the job. City vehicles shall not be used for transportation from a specific job site or location to another site or location for the purpose of taking a rest period or lunch period unless authorized by the City Administrator. Lunch periods shall be scheduled at the approximate mid -point of the work day and shall be limited to either forty-five (45) minutes or one (1) hour as determined by the departmental work schedule. Lunch periods shall be unpaid. X. HOLIDAYS New Year's Day President's Day Memorial Day July 4 Labor Day Thanksgiving Day Veteran's Day 1/2 day --Christmas Eve Friday after Thanksgiving Martin Luther King Day Christmas Day Employees eligible for holiday pay shall receive full pay for eight (8) hours straight time for each of the holidays listed. To be eligiblo for full holiday pay, the employee must be a regular., full-time employee and must work the full shift on the last scheduled work day before the holiday and first scheduled work day following the holiday provided, however., that if nn employee Is scheduled off work by the employer for the week In which the holiday occurs, or is off work because of an Injury or other excused absence, said employee shall receive pay for the holiday if otherwise eligible. Permanent part-time employees who have worked an average of 25 hours per week or more for at least six months shall receive FILES\PERSONN.POL Page 9 VACATION CHART Years of Service Vacation Time 0 to 1 year 5 days per year 2 thru 5 years 10 days per year 6 thru 14 years 15 days per year 15 plus years 20 days per year XII. EMPLOYEE INSURANCE BENEFITS 1. This section is not expected to give detailed explanation of all employee insurance benefits but rather to provide general information. Complete details of various employee benefits are available in the booklet supplied by the insurance company. Basically, a comprehensive insurance package is available on a participatory basis for both the employee and his/her dependents through a group policy selected by the City Council and in accordance with the eligibility provisions contained In the group benefit contract. 2. Full-time regular and permanent part-time employees who average 25 hours or more per week shall be eligible to apply for employee and dependent insurance benefits. 3. The City Council shall specify annually the monthly employee contribution amount it will provide for coverages of health, dental, and life insurance elected by full-time regular employees and his/her dependents. 4. The City of Monticello will contribute an amount equal to 50% of the monthly contribution amount provided for full-time regular employees towards the cost of health, dental, and life Insurances for a permanent part-time employee and his/her dependents who are eligible for coverage under XII (2). 5. Employees terminating from the City of Monticello have the option of receiving continued hospital and medical insurance coverngo. To obtain this continued coverage, employees must remit full premium payments for the cost to the City. Coverage for both the employee and insured dependents may be FILES\PERSONN.POL Page 12 XV. RETIREMENT - PERA 1. It is the policy of the City that all full-time employees be required to retire upon reaching the age of sixty-five (65) years. Any employee of the City covered by PERA may receive complete information by contacting: State of Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association Capitol Square Building St. Paul, MN 55101 XVI. SAFETY 1. Where items of safety equipment are required by federal, state, or local rules and regulations, it shall be a condition of employment that such equipment be worn by the employee. Employees may provide personal items only if approved. 2. All accidents involving personal injury occurring while performing work related duties shall be reported to the City Administrator within 24 hours of the incident. 3. Should any employee be observed not wearing the proper safety equipment or In violation of safety procedures, it shall be considered to be grounds for immediate dismissal. 4. All accidents between City equipment and private vehicles or private property should be reported by notifying the Wright County Sheriff's Department at the Lime of the accident so a complete report and drawing of the accidont can be preserved and by filing an accident report and turning it In to the City Administrator's office by the following day so it can De on hand for review. 5. Accidents will be reviewed by a review board. Members of the board will be: a. City Administrator b. Council member as designated by the Council C. Public Works Director d. A representative of the employee if such a representative is desired by the employee. FILES\PERRONN.POI. Page 19 Council Agenda - 4/9/90 10. Consideration of ratifyinq library board appointment. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The library board, by ordinance, requires a mayoral appointment with Council ratification. Currently, one term has expired on December 31, 1989, that was being filled by Marguerite Pringle. As you may recall, at the annual appointments on January 8, 1990, the Council did not reappoint an individual to this position until the library board had an opportunity to meet and make a recommendation. The library ooard did advertise for volunteers to serve on the board; and after reviewing the applications, they met and recommended that Rebecca Tesinski of 9942 Kadler Avenue, Monticello, be appointed to the board for a three-year term to expire December 31, 1992. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Ratify the appointment of Rebecca Tesinski to fill the vacancy on the library board for a three-year term. 2. Request the library board consider another applicant. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Unless the Mayor and/or Council members have another suggestion, the staff does not have a problem with the library board's recommendation. The library board did advertise for applicants; and based on their recommendation, they feel Rebocca is the best individual to fill this remaining term. D. SUPPORTING DATA: 1/ None. 12 Council Agenda - 4/9/90 11. Consideration of turn back or sale of excess right-of-way alonq the service drive of East County Road 39. (J.S.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: With the construction of the East County Road 39 project, the county road was relocated, and the City established a service drive on a portion of the old County Road 39 right-of-way. To construct that service drive, we acquired a portion of property from Curtis and Anna Mae Hoglund and agreed to turn back a small portion of the unused portion of the old County Road 39 right-of-way when the project was completed. This involved approximately five feet of right-of-way along the east side of the Riverroad Plaza and a portion of the site distance in the curve portion of the service drive where the existing propane tank for Riverroad Plaza is located. Recently, Wright County turned back to us all of the old right-of-way for County Road 39 In the area of the service drive. we are, therefore, in the process of developing documents to turn back that unneeded portion to Curt and Anna Mae Hoglund. In addition, there is a significant amount of right-of-way unneeded in a wedge-shaped parcel north of the intersection of the service drive and East County Road 39. This property, if turned back, could have a slight benefit to Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Block 3, Hoglund Addition, or it could have significant benefit to Lot 19, Block 3, Hoglund Addition. This turn back or right-of-way and Lot 19 are zoned PZM and are configured in such a way that the turn back could serve as parking or driveway entrance and parking for development on Lot 19. I have talked to Dennis Taylor, who at ono time was interested in a portion of the right-of-way, as he owns Lot 3. lie indicated that there is less interest now by the residents to acquire the right-of-way since there is a significant berm between the right-of-way and their property, thus limiting its use. This berm serves as a natural barrier, and Mr. Taylor has already planted some troos on his side of the berm. If we were to turn back this right-of-way, it could be done by a motes and bounds description as a single unit. If it were turned back to individual property owners, it might be boat to plat the area prior to turn back. At the current time, the property has no significant value to the City of Monticello and represents only a maintenance problem for the future. We may not be able to classify this property as boulevard and have the property owners maintain it as required by ordinance; therefore, we may end up mowing it In the future as we have done during the past year since the project was completed. It may be more applicable to offer this portion for sale to tho general public either in partials or as a whole and have the buyer or buyers pay for the necessary documentation for sale. The Council at that time 13 Council Agenda - 4/9/90 could determine whether the bids were such that all parcels could be sold to individual property owners or that a single bid on the entire parcel may be considered. A map is enclosed to show the location of the property and the approximate square footages. Currently, Lot 19 is served by an oversized water and sewer suitable for multiple or commercial use as allowed in a PZM. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative would be to turn back that portion of right-of-way as originally agreed to Curt and Anna Mae Hoglund and offer for sale that portion of right-of-way fronting Lots 1-4 and Lot 19 of Hoglund Addition on a per parcel basis with all to go•, or as a single piece. The actual sale would be determined by the City Council at a future meeting upon receipt of bids. 2. The second alternative would be to turn back that portion of right-of-way to Curt and Anna Mae Hoglund as originally agreed and to turn back the right-of-way to the existing Lots 1-4 and Lot 19 without fee if they would pay the transfer documentation costs. f_ 3. The third alternative would be to turn back that right- of-way to Curt and Anna Mae Hoglund as originally agreed and to keep the remaining portion of the right-of-way and classify it as boulevard and have the existing adjoining property owners maintain it. 4. The fourth alternative would be to turn back that right- of-way as originally agreed to Curt and Anna Mae Hoglund, not to sell the other right-of-way, and have the City maintain it in the future. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the City Administrator and Public Works Director that the City Council opt for alternative 01 and see if the property can be sold to each individual property owner with all to go• or a single buyer as outlined in alternative 01. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the map and estimated square footagos; Copy of the dead from Wright County turning back the property to the City of Monticello. •NOTE: If "all" parcels aro not sold on an individual basis, we could be stuck with the remaining parcels forever. 14 �.'IGHT.moF- WAY-) PLAT NO 6 TorAL APPROX. _ .2A,309+ Sa• Fr. P� B H _ u 86" 53'05 • E \ 7 OC,CVNQ ---2136.83--- � 6 ORI_ 4f4C4RC Our l0r q PLAZA \� 3 q s �.1e'QIr 490 �r oma 3,995* MC! 4OD/r �,io N dLv Ir �oN0 6 2 A 3 3 I9 � 5 9 0 B .9 1 2 2� 130 / p41V�1 ^ 2 23 -. ....... .... / VIEW P ea Ay 0 .� . 4, 0 8E R -YOKED jo Je 59 2 v0 Vt b 4?pry OA - .I Y TO 0E .• ° V > oto- < a /I� I ry�1 Os\ \ /,• w N W J rem Ne,nr-sun cuu+orto .n.. uml�nnr w cavo -nen .. vN.Mou b. el.n,.uvm ..... o.... r.,..,••..r. No delinquent taan and transfer mv-d; Cesulteatr 4677—, of Real Estate Value ( ) filed t 1 not "ubed ,a munlclunl coroorntloo Certificate of Real Estate Value Noxv. on f�o`r , �h*f'.Uus sus.....caxoa L(,np� calmly nydlmr °0 JAN gg FI.I 4:2J0AIs` ,Sr ,RtlaI q 52 Urpury `III0CB97 . L:CL'. S'T'ATE DEF ) TAX DUE IIEHF.ON: S 1.65 U}--��--SSIIfta• _ D•Le�L ;rer•a ed for data) coidinR FOR VALUABLE CONS] D ERATION, County of Wright a municipal corporation under the lar, of Minneaotn ,Grantor,hereby conveys and quiu:letmsl- i Ly_oHot^ I I ^ r Lph ,''rant,,. _munieinel corporation under the laws of Minnesota , real prolvrty in ter fight County. hlin—ut•,&—ilN•d os follow,: All Lha[ pert of WRIGIIT COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-wAY PLAT NO. 6 designs ted ae Rf verviav Driven Shoot 2 of 9 and ahoyn ea RIGIIT OF WAY TO BE REVOA ED. T—.1 r.onaideratlon of -lue, Ie $500. or lose I �r mde N». I. nrwr reel mu. on er.l lorrlhrr wtlh oil hrrod,wrienta.Ild apl-1-anrr, belonging Lh-- 1. COUNTY OF WRIGIIT ., t�U�irl'I'u+Alnmp.11,•r, Ify la. -'t ....��\l�. 1\`•. ��-i-e•, _ JAN g Its rha i r�tr -� )� e ' B ? - � - ti".�_ Y ha County C ord inn for STATE. OF MINN IW)TA COUNTY OF WRIGIIT as. Th, bnrgning was ar.Anorlmlpnd before me this _)j L_ daY of 'J{'}CNt JN` , IBI , by_Ar.lyn-.ft--Xe1W,1 and Richard W. Ilormnn th.-ChAirRC'=L— cord of Camnleelalgre __ and County Coordinetora of, COunLy--Qt Wrlahf ,a munlclunl coroorntloo undnr Thr law, of Mlnpanate on f�o`r , �h*f'.Uus sus.....caxoa L(,np� "IMAMJMBtEYY�..:..J NE NM[PIM M aa�ewt assess see • ru oa.rrru'ar.....N..... ruOrlenu J. Aeloeon neelnlent Wright County Attorney Wr lght County Cour[ Ilouoa nulfelo. Min Ito.ote 55313 (6 12) 602-3900• RaL. 109 At tornoy I.D. No. 1205GA Proper Cy Its ter o.ompt Zf WCN Council Agenda - 4/9/90 12. Consideration of shelter for Ellison Park. (J.S.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: This is a continuation of discussion from the previous two meetings regarding the placement of a large shelter in Ellison Park. At the last meeting, we presented information regarding a log structure, 24' x 40', with a 2 -foot end overhang and a 4 -foot side overhang. Estimated cost of this structure complete was about $18,000. At that time, the Council requested that we present additional options and/or designs and look at the possibility of using stucco rather than logs or wood to form the corners of the shelter. In addition, it was suggested that we stake three locations for the proposed building in Ellison Park so the Council could get an idea of the size of the building and pick a location. We will meet at 6:30 in Ellison Park to review the location. The estimated costs of the structures range from approximately $10,000 to $18,000 depending upon the type and configuration chosen. We have included some additional options in the supporting data. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative would be to pick a design and location and request that staff come back at the next meeting with final cost estimates and quotes based upon that design. 2. The second alternative would be to ask for additional information or designs such as an octagon or hexagon structure, etc. 3. The third alternative would be to do nothing. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director and Park Superintendent that the Council make a decision as to the design and location of the building so we can proceed with final cost estimates and quotes so that the building may be constructed in a timetable as requested by the Lions (alternative 01). The staff would also wish to have this decision made so that we may got direction for the rostroom facilities to be built in Bridge Park. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of building designs and quotes. 15 Y Y v Y v v Y Y v v v v Cow Pitch Beam Shelter to. Pitch Boom Kipped VoW Model A SPIECIFICAF10 S SK71 a or— L A. C. Eng:i cereal for pub!lc use and years of LOW PITCH BUM durcftl.ty Pectungii!0i shallots for inunici- MODEL ROOF Size P01:11015 Camps, and pail, law plich III W x 20' rns are laminated to AHC stomiari:13 bourns I B W k 28' "I structural integrity. Dessignod lot 551b. to 16' K 36' it load plus 201b put square foot wind IB 20' x 20' .-ud . corrU:naI!0n 40 Ib NO lood, 15 Ibto 20' x 28' aced load and a 20 lb Per 5qUE110 foot IB 20' x 36: wind food Many popu!at sizes In vAdIh to 201.44 Gild length there are WICICIlt 0001n I B 20' . 52' avo!!ub!0 In roof decking. shin fes and to 24' x 28' 1 0111101til SES PAD 22 columns A VOILJO In PILIAIC poWlord The to 24' . 36' ....... ove;all O=Qrzlons include a 24" over- 18 '.52; •t E.. P -n �5— Pini Rail, 0ccL1v hot ig on the OnCI3 and ticlus Shown with I If 'I 24' C Calor Shake option. to 30' x 36'R..ry 30: 44: 0 �B B 30 52 0. 1 30 60 W�11 It —lef Cl—i`0 POM13 1)0 I'll Q. 40, IB 40" 52' 8 40: : 60: B 40 68 to 50'. 52' IB 50, 60: 'B so, 68 a 50" 76' BBUM 50' " 84' HIPPED ROOF LOW PITCH SHELTER MODEL ROOF size 13 20'.28, :1�B 70' . 36' a�CtANGUL`ARiSWEl7�a5, Gear span deslpn 86. pienty ol.re-om for people- so aafcs: 61, viaces ioi_Diris rgpareA or. nest. Rectangular, shellers, 9 e { combine enduring beauty and slrenglli. '� +EspcClally popular.al,munlclpal parks; lho Rectangular Shellcrls anglneered'te'mi nd n to genera ed - •}t .�. •w� tions e-1 woatherinp and rugged /.. �o�tu.•n�es.artn of ( use.:•Ifls available In a variety of 'Standardsizes`bom18'x,20'to OGIAIL li SO', %'.84'. Larger sizes iie r•+� •. rw. w i C97iv' `1 avaliable upon repuest. The �+ •'a r++^w massive columns and Interior , ti boams,ara Iamiiraled. Asphalt r ' , +• },•, ,', r , , {; ;shingles; aro standard. 25Vhand - �, ,split madtum.$tiakas and steel �•+ "'' "'' '"�.r�1.j„� J£ Columns ie- both optional, I. rASCIA'AND LMUCUM[Nl' of ( 4,•r51 OGIAIL for moea mmfta waf . mficar om�+o. woe 1B Gothic Alec 1 �b Restrown Facility EI'[Ct(ICAICNSlOo11NO MN RmlrOvm Wtmx IxebntNmYld Y. C6Wppnorn►rdea.efl eed 11'! aaEb Iol�pB ad dolwa 11hAo�n fbtl Cam. b olcllaa m,mcM1 /nG1al olmlw Ivm.o 11w n1m moamsl Id eLL AJ716 IAl #,SY4 o A7x02i0-0OL xun e.aal 1.merpod hpo Padxm no[xxeAly Aol Im1r111 Pa Q1! Ui4x[.Y1 RI[l Cam �. TbIFVorJ. tl01 rO[c0a[l Iplp.'dJl ewer! Pm'Ir M RIDIOILL N[Fl1:lmlinbtl t[nell xd CAYmn b ee 1VIatvllrtiflxel d Grro CdtOUClvr aom+a MC�1 va ma+ua arc I�-[Iron minAdps bliv/o0enemrMC1 V{1, O.ldee QaarY PPbIO h d'CUODl1tl .en bre 0.Ylxcm rwen[y Sbma Md[r. NBMCAro01 tG6T YT U1oa 5a19rc a Nf1l iTs, po tmmrdoS rnmm U b WC 1b "IN owlewd Icolom¢I u lr nresile W .Iaa1a. Cly ly.a to ss b rola loan os m t1l sx dfa aaoe 1e11 �llgrnnr.l m Rllm Pxe,dmla) IaCvtx mea Iq bac QL Po 1),[l A�lle1V ettsP!S �q em cL>t [z IM.Icd alxti rrgr me Oaa1Rl IIm woe Paormm ew utlN kctR bb b1f cc['.1M1lA ream Pmda aw u lord Ixn cies n`aq 0lm loml an r�rrd Pl ax. ' Iartle 7. r dd xpe 41a xe10l0/ YeA n Gb0 Cortin OAr l l t1 m..eoa xmny Mdlrldr Sb t» u+YrM1 7Dl Cxm'A'rbcl}ja_S'A� Rerd[It•'�11l Arlm.mm+M1 bbl dalyow [:I roe and toy.61 qb n7 Nal hill. I[YII� Olen. b otm Cam cell am a•1 b aetm W'd \ It COUrlarn M0.p/ R— RW Daclxa ,nom v1w f6�V1 Y.71A71n �(,'mIttcerxtl[ V.'hltl/r cMx ;norm nn� Tk,^ti rk� cr>-,yta ncuax Ccom Gmo [rrb U c 6'[ X5+71 .VrU yarlm,arl Clear Spon yothb laminated arches, arty clfrnato. the overall dimensions the RLd Cedar CTterlor waft systonL make up a pprCal park Wrildlr�p Inchrdo o24, overMr rg on ends and sides. Two limber rmolosod bayS and 3 d w c.+nl[ I—xi fbdblf ry In designing Itro space Thal you open boys slmUar fbor plan as Parkoho rr o1 roqutro for concessions. kitchen% bath. PCIMIy Certlot (sco Papp 1J) addillonal looms and storogo Iadfilics. Erctose the sta0or bws avoa�c. Slwwm wNh catlrn AT"I apace ncodod M a kxaomcrds, custom gable and npllon omalAarla design dtio use to your needs. Many ptaru MODEL ROOF SIZE awitaWo. Comutl yew Cedar forest GAR 24' x 44' reprosontallvo for floor plans. chis tango pavtlion offers picnickers the spoco fa GAft 2fl' GAR 34'x 44' group oclMlle3 and year round Use N Gothic Arch Plivilion tr.'s r91 exr f.O�,". Ir ihG=+:u uTr-zlrl a'atn c–=:i mn ,n t�,x bN Rra ane Ira 1>0 SI' f I:TYkT T�xlClty. U] U.:aa .sn -r,a rr� It'd r1C'f �I,M keo {�CJf_n C1 C1aA W Oel• D'vyn n C�l1d mtl rrw3r�orori,xYr_acn - RIOknr�Y3r1,, J�aca H.'1 CI r3 fd l[V tl %Vl ,kl� + / [/ M ILIIMxIrt.INhRn.:.:x0.Yi. - 5 DI/ Atchltf[CflRcflN desklnf`d for beauty. strength of durntxkNl Ihis omllor arch design b the chpk'e of nXVW Ift1nell and CIPSOINS, lis disflrXI rxolite arias WWM fa all CKIMMI, Lan*loted aches Clgt.t T' on contut o1;iw lot a il" brrpths. Thele rare mires rN� %*N We$ Cwodew Opliorn kxiusks fknbet nnCb• Nxc4 the owmall roes dknaulons Inckme a 24` oycrhatg an the ands orad Will. Otl oilil sta INA/ 22 CC:h1 I[rx1YM Y�7ro tl' ts[rtre iteii aY �, Af GenMln 1tA: d 1'I, Yr� CKtritp Mk'xh recon CA?rxe r;mx 9m! 9xxl 19 MODEL ROOF $III CAAP P 2244' x 3366' GAPGIAP 28'06' X52 GAP 28'x44' GM 211'%521 GAP 34'x44' CAP 34' x t2' GAP 44' x 60' i C' - f CDuwTRY C, LEER Name ('-�V of M-4;k[/Lo Address MIA ►zmleA 114o,, -k L�4m�u 1�'�D BEAM ismuc-ruR� Dat,. y- to -90 Sa J esma n UEA:� w►. ,1;..►Io c,'�tt Not �1 Phane z9s- rill_-- Z�O Eo,,i Q•,�:ci,.r..�, t�lw(�,tlle, frl.,. z9S' 3170 Job Name car NumberJoh code iYYYt !'a..k SMItcI TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ESTIMATE. We are unable to guaranLue quantities listed; however., Quantity you will be billed only for materials used. Fxtra Errors materials will be billed at pr•eva, ling list priceR. AriL•hmetir, andfur typographical errors are subject to correction. Payment is due can the 7th r,f the mouth Payment following date of invoice. All discounts are forfeited if payment i9 not made an that dale unless arrangem,:nts are made in advance. A service charge will he added to' all balanC(2R over 30 days olcl. Vendor agrees to honor the unit prices set forth herein for deliveries made within a period of 4T-- clays provided acceptance is made within — 30 days of Quantities estimate date. Vendor will pr,,,vid, vend,.0 w.i.Lh a priced copy of estimate after accepLance is signed. Disclosure of Minnesota lien law RtaL„te will be made as �•- %Lein Law specified by law after t,aaevtanae; hnwever, a copy is printed on the reverse of. thin fr,r y -mar inspection. Thio is a summary of geuural ix,J iej.eF.a only, a more specific and detailed copy of terms will he mail-. available an request. vendee hereby authorizes vendor to furnish materials as listed on the estimate tit the prices set forth therciu. Credit This is not a contracL-only an estimate. All new customers must complete and return a credit; application prior to delivery. Additional Information Cross Total !TD7*'L--'7 TV. S8 sales Tax--Ll1iC'X1'.11'Y' ----- t ,up 1100.00 Te'La 1 _ { Aal 2,000.00 Other Total �. Less Discount: I(�e _r(?Jrl `�� Tota l�n J � • S' C/ If comparing esLimiLnR w/other 9uppli,:rR he Rome t.,) cnmpar© each item and check for identical qunnLit.ira, and ,ptaliLies. P. O. Dox 425 • Docker, Minnesota 55908 • (01P) 261.4444 - 14M 447-0205 �/ Z� 100 Chelsea Road • Monticello, MN .55362 • 295.2120 113 Central Ave. • St. Michael, MN 55376 • 497-2121 NAME +', c f 1 ' 1 o' -T -r w . + ,JOB r' `i x L-4,;, r2 a K- DATE �3 S a PAGE PIECES SIZE OESCFHPTION FEET PRICE { AMOUNT 15v LI,- �- 2-x,4iar>s. Y,-1m� . P, 127 { E G. y;.,r _ 7 -tel, n ter. 01,TT,,r n ;a,- 75'3 --r 2k /2T ►-/6i.PerrA- �•srzxitr �.._ �68� 6WAL (AP4.16"t { In Be_,.. %lucco 800.00 { -7q L,-. �/(a t-� Sloes t? % S1 1% &006.00 { S 4, ¢ A.c fin/ til G. Tarps, I94rT--a5 rF'o r. "iZ o 1I - 1 y�OOt .bci r-Lv 72 l/ D LN.ly. 7,r6 - 1/v I 214 zti N - s ' L,>. is p .T . / 2 S { /'10 L .i,./ aF Cr aan I4 11-7 IF Ori t /6� St'�L'Lr*" { ����Ze .� CT:,yty�r '�-rbc" b Sf �( �%._ ��...— • ✓/1 tN L- D,:v 68 9 . y ., { MR. 11111ftiIIIIIIIIIII 100 Chelsea Road • Monticello, MN 55362 • 295-2120 �L or 113 Central Ave. • SI. Michael, MN 55376 • 497-2121 NAMEC j ', Of: f Io^✓T KWt,w ,IOD Zyx y.w> raV K-- DATES 3 So PAGE 0� r ;lc� ��TB: PIECES I SIZE DESCRIPTION FEET I PRICE ! AMOUNT %u6rD7WL (P204.0 selssors +cuss W ik.• j,A6 pi" eeilintg 1000.00 5►riuceo 800.00 slab laet4v,."I 2000.00 Ord T4IL Joy004,bit 1� rd Council Agenda - 4!9!90 13. Consideration of ordinance amendment --public nuisance. (R.w.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: At the previous Council meeting, an ordinance amendment was passed clarifying provisions of our public nuisance ordinance and including a provision for a penalty for violators. In reviewing the entire public nuisance ordinance section, there is some contradiction as to the amount of time a property owner is allowed to correct the violation before other action is taken by the City. This has resulted from a number of amendments that have occurred since 1984 to this public nuisance ordinance; and hopefully, this will be the final amendment to clean up these housekeeping items. The basic conflicting language can be found in 7-1-1 (H), which had indicated that property owners had 14 days to correct violations. An additional ordinance amendment adopted in 1989 under Section 7-1-4, Enforcement, conflicts by allowing only 7 days to correct violations that was intended to pertain to weed and grass abatement. In order to simplify the ordinance, it is recommended that the ordinance amendment be adopted that would eliminate Section 7-1-1 (H) and amend i the enforcement section to specify that 7 days is the time allowed to correct any deficiencies concerning grass and weed abatement and 10 days for all other violations of the public nuisance ordinance. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Adopt the ordinance amendment as proposed. 2. Do not adopt the ordinance amendment. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the ordinance amendment be adopted in order to eliminate any confusing language in our present ordinance. If the amendment Is not adopted, the violators of our weed and grass section will have to be given 14 days instead of the intended 7 to conform. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of proposed amendment; Copy of sections of our existing ordinance. 16 ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS THAT ORDINANCE SECTION 7-1-1 (11) BE DELETED, SECTION 7-1-1 (I) BE RENUMBERED TO 7-1-1 (H), AND SECTION 7-1-4 PERTAINING TO ENFORCEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCES BE AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: 7-1-4 ENFORCEMENT: (A) Any person owning and/or occupying property within the city where activities described in subsection (C), (D), and (E) are in violation of this ordinance shall be so notified in writing by the City of the violation by certified mail and given seven (7) days to either correct the violation or appeal to the City Council for a determination that the complained of activity does not violate the ordinance. Any person owning and/or occupying property within the city where activities described in subsections (A), (B), (F), (G), and (II) are in violation of this ordinance shall be so notified in writing by the City of the violation by certified mail and given ten (10) days to either correct the violation or appeal to the City Council for a determination that the complained of activity does not violate the ordinance. An appeal to the City Council is perfected within the seven or ten day period (depending on violation) if the person In violation files with the City Administrator a written request to be placed on the next City Council agenda for purposes of the Council hearing the appeal. No further action shall then be taken by the City until such time as the City Council shall determine that a violation does exist. Any party ayyrleved by a decision hereunder by the City Council may appeal the decision to the District Court, Wright County, Minnesota, within 30 days of the Council's decision. If after seven or ten days of the notice of vlolntion the pernon In vinlnt.lon of this ordinnnce falls to correct the violation or appeal to the City Council, the City shall either: 1. petition the District Court for civil relief from the violation; or 2. remove and dispose of the material creating the violation and assess the cost of clean up, removal, and disposal against the property where such activity In violation of this ordinance occurred. For purposes of 7-1-1 (C), (D), and (E), the City need only provide tiro person in violntion thereof one notice in any one 12-munth period. if after a notice and within 12 months of such notice repeated violations occur, the City, without additional notice, may correct the conditlons creating such violations and assess the cost therefor againsl:'tho property whore such activity in violation of 7-1-1 (C), (D), or (E) occurrorl. 9 Ordinance Amendment No. Page 2 (B) PENALTY: Any person who violates any of the provisions of this ordinance is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than $700.00 and by imprisonment in the county jail of not more than 90 days. Adopted this 9th day of April, 1990. Mayor City Administrator D131 7-1-1 7-1-1 (E) In any area, on an occupied lot, the existence of weeds or grass in excess of six (6) inches in height or any accumulation of dead weeds, grass, or brush. (F) No person shall hereafter engage within the City in any trade or employment which is hurtful to the inhabitants or dangerous to the public health, or injurious to neighboring property, or from which obnoxious odors arise, or undue noise eminates, and specifically no person shall operate a dump or garbage dumping area or rendering plant or trailer court except such specific activity be authorized by the issuance of a permit as hereinafter provided. (G) It is unlawful for any person to cause or permit garbage, tin cans or refuse to be thrown or scattered upon any street, alley, highway, parkway, or boulevard or reel estate. The owners and occupants of lands shall remove such substances described Qa�05 in subsection (A), (C), (D), and (E) from such land, or eliminate the nuisance ° existing on such land or in default of removal therefrom within fourteen (14) days of a written notice from the Zoning Administrator or other authorized representative of the Council. The Zoning Administrator may order the removal QE at the expense of the owner or occupant, which expense shall become a lien upon the property to be collected as a special assessment. in lieu of such elimination, the Council may require the removal by appropriate court order or by criminal prosecution or by both. (5/29/84 9136) Stib 60 (I) All detached structures not requiring a building permit that do not /7% conform to the following requirements shall be deemed a public nuisance. Q tJ° `a1 1. All such detached structures shall be constructed of uniform building grade material. 2. All sides, roof, and floor shall be securely fastened to the interior frame of said detached structure. 3. All surfaces of such detached structures shall be stained, sealed, or painted. 4. Exterior metal surfaces shall be treated with materials designed to resist corrosion. S. Structures that do not have alab floors shall have a rodent barrier that extends 8 inches under the surface of the ground along the perimeter of the outside wall of the structure. All such detached structures shall be permanently anchored to the ground. 7. Storage sheds erected after the adoption of the zoning ordinance shall meet district setback requirements. 8. Detached structures shall be erected in the aide or rear yard of any residence. (7/10/89 1178) SCNT` 0,PPiN44IC-f. 7-1-4 7-1-4 7-1-4: ENDO Any person owning property within the City where vities in violation of this ordinance are occurring shall be so notified in writing by the City of the violation by -certified made and given seven days to either correct the violation or appealAo the City council for a determination that the complained of activity does/not violate the ordinance. An appeal to the City Council is perfected within the seven day, period if the person in violation files with the City Administrator a written request to be placed on the next City Council agenda for purposes,,of the Council hearing the appeal. No further action shall then be taken by the -City until such time as the City Council shall determine that a violation does exist. Any party aggrieved by a decision hereunder by the City Council may appeal the decision to the District Court, Wright County, Minnesota within 30 days of the Council's decision. If after seven days of the notice of violation the person in violation of this ordinance fails to correct the violation or appeal to the City Council, the City shall either: a) petition the District Court for civil relief from the violation; or b) remove and dispose of the material creating the violation and assess the cost of clean up, removal, and disposal against the property where such activity in violation of this ordinance occurred. For purposes of 7-1-1 (D), the City need only provide the person in violation thereof one notice in any one 12 -month period. If after a notice and within 12 months of such notice repeated violations occur, the City without additional notice may correct the conditions creating such violations and assess the cost therefor against the property where such activity in violation of 7-1-1 (D) occurred. (7/10/89 0179) Council Agenda - 4/9/90 14. Update on hirinq City Inspector. (J.S.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Staff has readvertised for the City Inspector position with a closing date of April 17, 1990, to coincide with the deadline date of the advertisement for the water/wastewater collection system operator position (to fill Tony Strands's position). A verbal update will be given at the Council meeting by staff. 17 CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL ITEM 011ie Koropchak, EDA Executive Director April 4, 1990 The Monticello Economic Development Authority (EDA) approved it's first Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund (GMEF) loan on April 4, 1990. As per the GMEF guidelines, please note that from the EDA approval date, the City Council has 21 days in which to reverse the EDA decision. EDA Commissioner Warren Smith made a motion to approve a $100,000 GMEF loan request for Tapper s, Inc., because the company's financial statements, as analyzed by Kevin Doty of Wright County State Bank, determined Tappers, Inc., to be a credit worthy business. Secondly, the GMEF guidelines state all loans must comply with four or more of the six public purpose criteria (creation of jabs being a must). Said loan meets public purposes: 1. Credit worthy business that creates new jobs (estimated between 15-20). 2. Credit worthy business that increases the community tax base (estimated annual taxes of $27,000). 3. Assistance to an existing Industrial business expanding and relocating their operation to Monticello. 4. Provides gap funding. 5. Provides funds for economic development that could be used to assist in obtaining other funds such as Small Business Administration loans, federal and state grants, etc. Thirdly, the loan complies with GMEF policies: A $100,000 Companion Direct Loan, which is in a third subordinated position to the primary lenders, Wright County State Batik and Small Business Administration, on real property development and machinery and equipment. Leverage - Wright County State Bank $358,750 408 SBA Loan 358,750 408 GMEF 100,000 11.36 TIF 771500 8.7% (equity) $895,000 The loan term was adjusted to moot SBA loan terms as recommended by Bob Heck, BDS, Inc. Real estate and M 6 E is amortized over 20 years with balloon payment in 7 years. The SBA loan term is 20 years. According to SBA S.O.P., any subordinated debt must have a maturity equal to or greater than the 504 debenture. Therefore, the EDA elected to balloon at 7 years, not 5 years as par EDA policy. The adjustment moats SBA's 10% total project subordinated i- CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL ITEM {� April 4, 1990 Page 2 debt 20 -year term. Total project of $895,000 times 108 equals required subordinated debt of $89,500 less equity or TIF of $77,500 equals GMEF loan portion of $12,000 (balloon at 7 years). The interest rate is 88, which is 28 below Minneapolis prime. As of April 3, 1990, Minneapolis prime is 10% per First Bank Minneapolis. The loan fee to the developer is to be waived, and Wright County State Bank will service the GMEF loan for a service charge of $20.00 per month. EDA staff is responsible for loan payment collection. The service charge will be deducted from the GMEF accumulated interest. An intercreditor agreement between the developer, the lending institution, and the EDA shall be drafted and executed in addition to the Authorization Releasing Information form. The motion was seconded by Harvey Kendall and passed 6-0. Rick Wolfsteller, Kevin Doty, and 011ie Koropchak will meet Thursday, April 5, 1990, with Attorney Tom Hayes to discuss preparation of the necessary loan documents. Enclosed is a copy of the April 4 EDA meeting, project funding, and the loan approval recording form. C