Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 05-29-1990AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 29, 1990 - 7:00 p.m. Mayor: Ken Maus Council Members: Fran Fair, Shirley Anderson, Warren Smith, Dan Blonigen 1. Call to order. 2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held May 14, 1990. 3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaintc. 4. Review of community education/summer recreation program for 1990. 5. Consideration of adopting a resolution awarding bids for Project 90-02, 7th Street and Minnesota Street. 6. Consideration of hiring operator/mechanic for Public Works Department. 7. Consideration of hiring groundskeeper/janitor. 8. Consideration of adopting process governing information submittal for variances, conditional use permits, and zoning ordinance amendment applications. 9. Consideration of establishing a fee for special meetings of the Planning Commission and consider providing compensation to Planning Commission members that attend special meetings. 10. Consideration of authorizing purchase of base radio for office of Public Works Department. 11. Consideration of approving gambling license renewal --American Legion Club. 12. Consideration of gambling license ronewal--VFW Club. 13. Information --The Ride Across Minnesota- -Preliminary Plan. 14. information --City Engineer review of PCA Draft Permit for Wastewater Treatment Plant--Kjollberg West. 15. Consideration of adopting a resolution requesting assistance for the placement of flood elevation reference marks and signing of 100 -year flood mark at various locations within the city of Monticello. City Council Agenda May 29, 1990 Page 2 16. Consideration of inspection criteria and grid system for city of Monticello sidewalks. 17. Consideration of approval of bills for the month of May. 18. Adjournment. NOTE: Meeting is on TUESDAY due to Memorial Day on Monday. MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, May 14, 1990 - 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Ken Maus, Fran Fair, warren Smith, Shirley Anderson, Dan Blonigen Members Absent: None 2. Approval of minutes. Item #8 on the April 23 minutes was corrected to include the vote of the Council. After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson to approve the regular meeting minutes of the Monticello City Council held April 23, 1990. Motion included approval of the meeting minutes of the special meeting held January 29, 1990. Motion was seconded by Dan Blonigen and carried unanimously. 3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints. Linda Smith of Little Mountain Flowers submitted a petition to the City Council requesting that the City regulate the commercial activity of transient merchants in the community. Smith noted that the retail merchants are concerned about the commercial survival of the businesses that must compete with transient merchants and scavengers who, for a small fee, are permitted to compete against the city -based retailers. Her concern was that the outsiders undercut local retailers with inferior merchandise and non-existent services. Smith requested that the City develop ordinances that control transient merchant activity. Mayor Maus thanked Linda Smith for the letter outlining the retailers concerns and noted that the City Council will bring this item up as a regular agenda item. 4. Consideration of appeal on a public nuisence order. Applicant, Luke Torell. Mr. Torell requested that the vehicle that he is storing behind his residence be allowed to remain there at least 90 days even though the vehicle is not operable and in violation of the public nuisance ordinance. Torell indicated that he does intend to get the vehicle in working order. Page 1 a Council Minutes - 5/14/90 Fran Fair asked why Torell doesn't place the vehicle in the garage. Mrs. Torell indicated that the garage is filled with other items and cannot accommodate the vehicle. After discussion, motion was made by Dan Blonigen, seconded by Fran Fair, to provide Mr. Torell 60 days in which to comply with the public nuisance ordinance. Motion carried unanimously. 5. Consideration of a conditional use request to allow a daycare/ headstart program in an R-2 (single and two family residential) zone. Applicant, First Baptist Church/Wright Countv Communitv Action Headstart Proqram. Arlene Wirth of the Wright County Community Action Headstart Program was present to describe the daycare/headstart activity proposed for the Baptist Church site. Arlene noted that the facility is serving Monticello children who otherwise would need to travel to other communities to receive the headstart services. Ken Maus asked City staff if there might be a problem with the headstart student use of the nearby park area. John Simola i noted that the park does not include a tot lot; however, he could see no reason why the children wouldn't be allowed to use the area as long as they are supervised. A local resident, John Holler, asked if the City would look Into making the park bigger to accommodate the number of children that will be using the park from the headstart program. After discussion, motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by Fran Fair, to grant the conditional use request allowing a daycare/headstart program in an R-2 (single and two family residential) zone. Motion carried unanimously. 6. Consideration of conditional use permit which would allow retail/commercial activity in a PZM zone. Applicant, JKMV Partnership/21st Century Builders. Mayor Maus relinquished the chair to Acting Mayor, Fran Fair. Assistant Administrator O'Neill reviewed the site plan and outlined the suggested conditions associated with this permit. He also noted that the Planning Commission had recommended approval of the conditional use permit subject to the applicant obtaining a variance which would allow the northerly r most access onto Cedar Street to be located within 40 feet of the Sth Street right-of-way. Pago 2 02- Council Minutes - 5/14/90 O'Neill also went on to note that during the excavation and grading of the site placing it in the condition it is today, material was deposited underground in an area along the northern boundary of the property. O'Neill informed Council that it is likely that some of this debris is located on the City 5th Street right-of-way. Dan Blonigen suggested that a condition be added to the permit which would require that the developer remove all debris material dumped on City right-of-way prior to issuance of a building permit. Fran Fair also noted that the debris material should be removed from the 5th Street right-of-way as a condition of the conditional use permit. After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Dan Blonigen, to approve the conditional use permit subject to the following conditions: 1. Development of a final landscaping and berming plan creating effective transition between commercial and residential properties as determined by the City Planner. 9 A bond in the amount of 1008 of the cost to install L• berming and landscaping shall be provided to the City prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. Development of a retaining wall shall be accompanied by Installation of a safety fence for the purpose of eliminating access to the edge of the retaining wall. The fence shall be made of weather resistant material and be at least 6 feet high. 3. Prior to issuance of building permit, drainage and retaining wall construction plans shall be approved by the City Engineer. 4. The southerly most access onto Cedar Street shall be aligned with 6th Street. 5. The northerly most access onto Cedar Street shall be moved 40 feet to the south of 5th Street, eliminated, or a variance allowing the access to be located at this point shall be obtained. Page 3 0 Council Minutes - 5/14/90 6. Applicant shall remove all debris previously placed on the 5th Street right-of-way along the northern boundary of the property. Removal process must be reviewed by City Inspector. Debris must be removed prior to issuance of a building permit. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of approval of preliminary and final plat of Kirkman Addition (K -Mart). Applicant, The Lincoln Companies. Assistant Administrator O'Neill described the preliminary and final plat of the Kirkman Addition and noted that the plat cleans up a complex set of metes and bounds legal descriptions. In addition, the plat development is a requirement of the development agreement between the City and The Lincoln Companies and is in sufficient compliance with the standards noted in the subdivision ordinance. Dan Kling of OSM suggested that one modification to the plat might include the outline of the area needed for on-site ponding. This area would be indicated as such on the plat and could not be used for any other purposes. Assistant Administrator O'Neill asked if the pond area identified on the plat would commit the City to any type of long-term responsibility for maintenance. Kling indicated that identification of the pond area on the plat would not necessarily require that the City be responsible for future maintenance of the pond area. After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Warren Smith, to approve preliminary and final plat of the Kirkman Addition subject to placement of the identification of the pond area on the final plat. Motion carried unanimously. B. Consideration of rezoning request of land south of realigned 7th Street right-of-way trom PZM (performance zone mixed) to B-3 (highway business) zoninq. Applicant, The Lincoln Companies. Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that the proposed amendment to the zoning map calls for amending the zoning map to reflect the final alignment of the 7th Street right-of-way. Pago 4 LOA Council Minutes - 5/19/90 After discussion, motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by Fran Fair, to adjust the zoning map in a manner reflecting the final alignment of the 7th Street right-of-way in the area of the Monticello Mall/K-Mart development. The land area between the original alignment and final alignment is to be rezoned from PZM to B-3 zoning. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of resolutions authorizing the sale of bonds for Tax Increment District 1-1 (7th Street Project) and refunding of 1983 G.O. Bond alonq with Meadows 2nd Addition phase II improvement. Catherine Polta reviewed the proposed resolutions authorizing sale of bonds. Administrator Wolfsteller noted that with the bid opening scheduled for May I8 for the improvement of 7th Street and Minnesota Street as part of the K -Mart project, it is now time to consider authorizing sale of bonds to finance these improvements as part of the City's Tax Increment District 1-1. The City has already incurred costs and land acquisition for the 7th Street alignment. With K -Mart now under construction, it is recommended that authorization be granted to sell bonds in the amount of $560,000, which is consistent with the adopted budget within the tax increment t plan. According to the adopted budget, the tax increment 4- revenue that will be generated from the K -Mart project will be sufficient to retire the bonded indebtedness and additional revenue will be available in the future from proposed assessments pertaining to Minnesota Street and 7th Street improvements paid by The Lincoln Companies and others. They can be utilized by the City for its improvement funds in the future. After discussion, motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to approve a resolution authorizing bond sale for the 7th Street improvement project in the amount of $560,000. Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 90-19. Page 5 Council Minutes - 5/14/90 1p. Consideration of adoptinq ordinance amendment which would allow operation of a prototype furnace usinq rubber products as fuel in an I-1 zone. Assistant Administrator O'Neill informed Council that the Planning Commission had recommended that the City adopt the ordinance amendment which would allow operation of a prototype furnace using rubber products as fuel in the I-1 zone on a 4 to 1 vote. O'Neill also went on to review the proposed conditions associated with the operation of the furnace. Ray Schmidt of Universal Equipment Manufacturing, along with Wes Sprunk, provided answers to Council's questions regarding the operation of the furnace. Schmidt noted that if approval Is granted, his company will be occupying the structure in the near future and should be employing up to 20 people by next summer. Schmidt also went on to note that the conditions suggested by the Planning Commission are acceptable, and his company is willing and able to comply with all requirements noted. After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Fran Fair, to approve an ordinance amendment establishing operation of a prototype rubber burning furnace incidental to a principal use as a conditional use in an I-1 zone provided that: 1. The furnace must meet all existing or future air emission standards as established by federal or state pollution control agencies. 2. Stack height must be high enough to eliminate potential of stack gases being trapped at the ground level by the effect of wind flow around buildings. 3. Before a date set by the City, furnace will undergo emissions testing on prototype furnace and applicant will apply for an air emission permit from the PCA even if exempt from PCA regulations. Furnace design must moot or exceed proportion requirements for a one million BTU furnace as required by the PCA. Failure of emission test during prototype development or failure to obtain permission to sell this product in Minnesota shall terminate conditional use permit. Page 6 0 tt Council Minutes - 5/14/90 l.. 14 L.. 4. Regular use of the furnace shall be limited to the heating season. Non -heating use of the system shall be limited to testing and demonstration. Furnace shall not be operated for the sole purpose of reducing waste tires. 5. A 6 -foot, 908 opaque fence shall be used to screen waste tire storage areas. No waste tires shall be in plain view. The site may not contain more than 75 unprocessed tires at any one time. The site may not be used as a tire transfer station. 6. Complaints made by area property owners about the furnace emissions may be sufficient cause for the City to withdraw the conditional use permit and, therefore, halt furnace operation. 7. Waste ash and particulate recovered, if deemed hazardous by the Pollution Control Agency at some time in the future, shall be treated at that time as hazardous waste and shall be disposed of in a manner approved by the City of Monticello and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Motion carried unanimously. In reviewing the conditions above, necessary stack height is to be determined by the Pollution Control Agency given the characteristics of the area; and the date by which the testing of emissions is completed shall be established by City staff and dependent on the date by which the furnace begins prototype operation. SEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 188, 11. Consideration of conditional use permit which would allow operation of a prototype furnace using rubber products as' fuel. Motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Dan 8lonigen, to approve issuance of a conditional use permit allowing operation of prototype furnace using rubber products as fuel subject to conditions noted by ordinance. Motion carried unanimously. Pago 7 9 Council Minutes - 5/14/90 12. Consideration of a resolution a::ardinq bids for Project 90-03, street and utility improvements for the Meadows 2nd Addition, Phase II. After discussion, motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to award the project to the lowest responsible bidder, which is Redstone Construction of Mora, Minnesota, in the amount of $81,899.55. Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 90-21. Motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Warren Smith, to adopt a resolution authorizing bond sale calling for refinancing of a 1983 Meadow Oak bond issue and the Meadows 2nd Addition improvements in the amount of $730,000. Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 90-20. 13. Consideration of acceptinq appraisal for park dedication purposes --West Prairie Partners plat. After discussion, motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Dan Blonigen, to provide the developers with two options for establishing the valuation of the development area. The City will accept the County Assessor's valuation for 1990 taxes at $17,200, or the City will accept the appraisal of the property by a third party independent of the original transaction and certified to do appraisals according to accepted standards. Voting in favor of the motion: Warren Smith, Fran Fair, Dan Bloniaen, Shirley Anderson. Opposed: Ken Maus. 14. Consideration of a zoninq amendment to amend the entire section of Chapter 18, Flood Plain Manaqement Ordinance. Applicant, City of Monticello. Council was informed by staff that the City is required to amend the flood plain ordinance as requested by the Department of Natural Resources. In order for area residents to qualify for flood insurance, the City must be in compliance with all flood plain management regulations, which would be accomplished by updating the existing flood plain ordinance. After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by warren Smith, to approve the amendment to the flood plain ordinance as outlined. Motion carried unanimously. SEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 189. Page 8 Council Minutes - 5/14/90 15. Consideration of zoninq ordinance amendment reducing convenience food parkinq requirement. Applicant, Shingobee Builders. O'Neill reported that Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this matter and recommends approval of the proposed amendment outlined below. Planning Commission reviewed the technical data showing that the current ordinance requires parking in excess of the parking demand generated during peak periods experienced by convenience or "fast food" shops. O'Neill informed Council that Shingobee Builders requests that the City consider amending the parking requirements associated with convenience food establishments. The proposed reduction amounts to a significant reduction in the convenience food parking requirement and could be accomplished by placing the "convenience food" activity in the same parking requirement category as restaurants, night clubs, taverns, cafes, and private clubs serving food and drinks. O'Neill went on to note that according to the zoning ordinance, the Subway Sandwich Shop clearly meets the definition of a convenience food establishment; therefore, it appeared clear-cut that the sandwhich shop needed 60 parking spaces. After further investigation, it was found that the City of Monticello, in years past, has used the "restaurant" parking requirement when establishing the parking requirements associated with other "convenience food" establishments, including Wendy's and McDonalds. In light of this information, staff contacted the City Planner and researched other ordinances regulating parking associated with convenience food activity. O'Neill reported that convenience food parking requirements vary from city to city. Roseville, for instance, requires about the same number of convenience food parking spaces as is required by the existing Monticello ordinance. On the other hand, recent traffic studies indicate that the parking ratio for restaurants is adequate for convenience food activities; therefore, there does appear to be a rationale for reducing the convenience food parking requirement based on the traffic study. Ken Maus noted that the research on convenience food parking supports what the City has been doing. Dan Blonigen was concerned that the degree by which the ordinance is being amended is excessive. Pago 9 0 Council Minutes - 5/14/90 Rick Wolfsteller noted to Council that the convenience food parking requirement originally applied to drive-in facilities, which require significantly more parking area than fast food establishments. The ordinance amendment proposed reflects changes in the delivery of this type of food service which no longer is typified by people eating food in their cars at the restaurant site. After discussion, motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Warren Smith, to amend the zoning ordinance by moving convenience food parking requirements from 3-5 (H), number of parking spaces required, Section 13, to Section 19. Voting in favor: Fran Fair, Ken Maus, Warren Smith, Shirley Anderson. Opposed: Dan Blonigen. SEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 190. 16. Consideration of ordinance amendment deleting suretv bond requirements for on -sale liquor license aoplicants. After discussion, motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Warren Smith, to amend the ordinance by deleting the surety bond requirement, as the City is not now required by the state to obtain a surety bond in the amount of $3,000 before issuing on -sale liquor licenses. Motion carried unanimously. SEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 191. Administrator Wolfsteller noted that all applications for on - sale retail licenses still must file with the City and the state a certificate of liability insurance in an amount not less than $300,000, which should adequately protect the public. 17. Consideration of qrantinq annual approval for municipal licenses. Ken Maus noted that some of the private clubs are actively advertising to the public, which is not consistent with their private club status and municipal license fee paid. Maus noted that with the issuance of private club liquor licenses, the license should include the provision that the establishment must not advertise or serve liquor to the general public. After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Dan Blonigen, to approve the municipal licenses as outlined and include a reminder to the private clubs of their status and notify them that advertising liquor sales that aro open to the public may result in the withdrawal or withholding of private club liquor licenses. Motion carried unanimously. Pago 10 0 Council Minutes - 5/14/90 18. Consideration of sale of excess right-of-way at the intersection of service drive and East County Road 39 adioininq Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 19, Block 3, Hoqluncl Addition. Area residents affected by the proposed sale were in attendance. After discussion, motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to sell the property on a contract for deed basis at $.25 per square foot. Terms of the contract are to include a 7 -year payback period at 88. In addition, the area residents shall be responsible for the platting of the area affected by the sale. Motion carried unanimously. 19. Consideration of accepting a portion of annual sidewalk report_ and adopting a resolution settinq a public hearina. After discussion, motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Shirley Anderson, to authorize staff to post warning signs at the location of substandard sidewalks and notify property owners of the disrepair of these sidewalks. Motion carried unanimously. It was the consensus of the Council to review the sidewalk system report at the next Council meeting set for Tuesday, May 29, and possibly set a public hearing for sometime in June 1990. 20. Other matters. After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Fran Fair, to designate the south side of Broadway for Monticello Liquor to the intersection of Highway 25 as a 30 -minute parking area based on the finding that there is no immediate accessible parking for businesses in that area of the block, and the nature of the business (short-term convenience) dictates short-term parking while nearby business such as the Monticello Theater require longer term parking. Motion carried unanimously. There being no further discussion, the meeting adjourned. W��o Jeff O'Neill Assistant Administrator Page 11 501 Council Agenda - 5/29/90 Review of community education/ summer recreation program for 1990. (R.W.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Mr. Duane Gates, Community Education Director for the school, will be present at the meeting to review and update the City Council on the summer recreation program scheduled for 1990. As you know, the City of Monticello contributes annually an amount toward the summer recreation program sponsored through the community education system. For the year 1990, the budgeted amount is $16,500. I believe Mr. Gates will explain where our funds are being allocated within their program, but it is my understanding that in the past, the City has contributed money toward defraying the cost of a swimming program at the school and also for such events as tee ball for the youth as part of the summer school program. Although it has not been accomplished at this point, it has been my intent to do a more detailed survey of surrounding communities, including those in the twin city area, to determine what involvement the city usually has in regard to summer recreation programs for its youth. Some comments have been made that it is the City's responsibility to sponsor and fund programs for summer recreation, and other indications are that schools and other organizations fund these activities. In the future, I hope to be able to present a survey to give the Council an idea of what other communities do actually provide. Although the City of Monticello does not currently run any summer recreation programs, we do contribute the $16,500, which certainly has to cover a large amount of the cost in running a tee ball program and/or swimming lessons, etc. As to what other activities are normally provided for the youth, I am not sure at this point what other communities provide. School officials have indicated that they do feel the school system has taken over a lot of responsibility for recreation activities in Monticello that maybe should have been the responsibility of the City. For example, all swimming activities take place on school property utilizing their indoor pool, and many communities fund that program through the city. In addition, all of the tennis courts currently avallablo within the city of Monticello have boon provided by the school, and many communitios do provide public tennis courts. It appears that the City Council may have to address this issue in the future as to what, if any, additional facilities should be provided by the City rather than through the school system. It's possible that Mr. Gatos' presentation may shed some additional light on this subject. At this point, there is no action needed by the Council other than discussion with Mr. Gates concerning the upcoming recreational program scheduled. SUPPORTING DATA: Recreational program summary provided by community education. 92, INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 882 Sheldon D. Johnson, Superintendent ' Telephone (612) 295-5184 P. O. BOX 897 MONTICELLO. MINNESOTA 55362 BOARD OF EDUCATION MEMO Donald Donn Charman James Herbst Clerk TO: Monticello City Council Kathleen Swinshart Treasurer FROM: Duane Gates, Community Education Director wuaam Bellach Director SUBJ: Summer Recreation Program Marcy Caasana DATE: May 25, 1990 Director Ediorard Holto.ay, The purpose of this memo and appearance before the City Director Council on May 29 is to review plans for the Summer Recreation Program and answer any question you may have this regarding this program. ADMINISTRATION As you know, Warren Smith is the City Council's Mlchost Bernadino appointed representative to the Monticello Community Ass. Suol.nnstiucton Education Advisory Council. At a recent Advisory 2955184 Council meeting he suggested that I appear before the 4hardWiters City Council to keep you informed of the various luness manager activities within the Summer Recreation Program which 2955184 is funded in part by the City Council (this year the LyndonSonlu city budgeted $15.500.). High School Principal 2952917 The attached summary sheet lista the proposed Rosen voices activities and estimated costa. High School Principal 295291) The figures listed below give you a general idea of Kenalt Benin participation figures from last years program. Middle School Prinuom 893 - in 20 activities ranging from t -ball to tennis 295518) 910 - open gym Kay Douglass 858 - swimming lessons Elementary Principal 295-5184 4608 - open swim 222 - tripe Bruce No.ak 1195 - Preschoolers in the Park Elementary Principal 400 - Concert in the Park 295.2974 Rkh" FAe Registration for this summer is currently underway and AthleticDirector preliminary enrollment figures will be available Tuesday. 295.?D117 2952 Paul Lemke Please feel free to contact me at any time during the spinal Education Director summer or throughout the year. if you have any questions 2955185 regarding the Summar Recreation Program or Community +aoatn Education in general. My office number is 295-2915. numty Education err. •2919 Thank you in advance for the opportunity to appear Candace Baron before the Council. Anal. Community Edua. Dir. 2952915 92, May 25, 1990 MONTICELLO SUMMER REC PROGRAM EST. COST ACTIVITY SUMMARY Ball Programs $4,480.00 Swim Lessons $6,950.00 Open Swim $1,012.00 Open Gym $425.00 B'ball-elem $400.00 B'ball-6-11 $1,520.00 Tennis $740.00 Soccer $420.00 Kids Games $170.00 Fri Fun Time $100.00 Track Clinic $100.00 Wrestling S50.00 Solving Mysteries $160.00 Preschool in Park/Concert $1,935.00 Gym/Tumbling $880.00 Phy. Fit/Weight Rm $1,700.00 Volleyball 5400.00 S21,442.00 SPECIAL ACTIVITIES $588.00 Neon Sweats Pre July 4th Photography Artworks Goodie Bake Preschool Picnic Preschool Castle Scavenger Hunt Pizza/Pool party Cake Decorating Ice Cream Social Hawaiian Party $568.00 SUPPLIES/EQUIP S850.00 TRANSPORTATION (SP. EV) $750.00 PUBLICITY $950.00 ADMINISTRATION Director (In-kind)• Assist. Director (.25) $9,000.00 Secretary (.20) $4,400.00 OPERATIONAL EXPENSE (In-kind)' -Pool Maint. 6 chemicals - Facility Maint. FICA AND FRINGES (In-kind)• •Fees collected help off set in-kind posts. $2,550.00 $13,400.00 $37,980.00 Council Agenda - 5/29/90 5. Consideration of adopting a resolution awardinq bids for Project 90-02, 7th Street and Minnesota Street. (J.S.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The bid opening for the proposed 7th Street project was held at 11:00 a.m. on Friday, May 18. Six bids were received ranging from $242,581.93 from R.L. Larson Excavating in St. Cloud, Minnesota, to a high of $285,943.30 from Northdale Construction. The low bid from R.L. Larson Excavating is well under the engineer's estimate, and the City Engineer has recommended the award be made to R.L. Larson Excavating. Enclosed you will find a breakdown of the bid costs, including contingency, administration, legal, engineering, inspection, and bonding costs versus the estimated costs of the original financial model. As can be seen by the attached information, there is approximately a $46,000 savings over the original estimated cost of the construction portion of the project. It should be noted that an additional retaining wall had to be added to the south side of 7th Street near Locust Street to stabilize the existing parking facilities. Even with this addition, the cost of the 7th and Minnesota Street improvement project is significantly lower than previously estimated. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative is to award the 7th Street and Minnesota Street Project 90-02 to R.L. Larson Excavating of St. Cloud, Minnesota, for the amount of $242,581.93. 2. The second alternative would be not to award the bid. This seems to be inappropriate, as the bid costs are significantly lower than those previously estimated. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the staff recommendation that the City award the project as outlined in alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of bid tab; Copy of bid costs; Letter from OSM recommending award; Copy of resolution for adoption. L BID TABULATION FOR STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS',' l ft AND APPURTENANT WORK 7TH STREET AND MINNESOTA STREET 6 PROJECT NO. 90-02 MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA BIDS OPENED: May 18, 1990 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON 11:00 A.H. 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. ADDENDUM BID TOTAL CONTRACTOR NOTED SECURITY BID Annandale Contracting x 5% bond $252,197.04 Buffalo Bituminous x 59 bond $274,153.75 La Tour Construction x 5% bond 5200.857.30 Northdalo Construction x 5% bond $205,943.30 Redstone Conatruction x 5% bond $261,102.45 R.L. Larson Exc. x 5% bond $242,501.93 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS 1S A TRUE AND CORRECT TABULATION OF THE BIDS AS RECEIVED ON: DATE: May 18, 199n BY: Dan S. Kling •Donotoo Corrocted Figure OSM Comm. No. 4534.00 6 4535.00 0 BID COSTS PROJECT 90-02 4 Original ConstructionI Admin.,Legal Financial Cast Contingency Subtotal Eng.,Insp.,Bond Total Model Difference 1 17th Street $126.086.00 $12,608.60 $138,694.60 $37,447.54 $176,142.14 $175,000.00 ($1,142.14)1 Street $28,487,00 $2,848.70 $31.335.70 $8,460.64 $39,796.34 $50,000.00 $10.203.66 IMinnesota 7th St. Storm Sewer $42,381.50 $4.283.15 $46,664.65 $12.599.46 l $59,264.11 $70,000.00 $10.735.89 Minn. St. Storm Sower $17,455.28 $1,745.53 $19,200.81 $5.184.22 I $24,385.03 $30.000.00 $5,614.97 Minn. St. San. Sewer $12,102.10 $1,210.21 $13,312.31 $3,594.32 $16,906.63 $30,000.00 $13,093.37 Minn. St. Water $16,070.05I $1.607.01 $17,677.06 $4,772.81 $22.449.87 $30,000.00 $7,550.13 I 1 $338.944.12 $385,000.00 $46,055.88 4 ONOrr schelen X Mayeron Q Asso[Idt[S, In[. 2021 fast Hennepin Avenue MlnnCdt%�05, MN 55413 ,,12.331.8660 �— May 23, 1990 FAX 331-38U6 s [n nccrs Surveyors Planners City of Monticello 250 East Broadway Monticello, MN 55362 Attn: Rick Wolfsteller Administrator Re:. Street and Uti:ity Improvements and Appurteita„ t Work 7th Street and Minnesota Street for the City of Monticello, Minnesota Project No. 90-2 OSM Comm. No's. 4534.00 and 4535.00 Dear Mr. Wolfsteller: Bids were received and read for the above project at 11:00 A.M. on May 18, 1990. Six (6) bids were received. R.L. Larson Excavating, Inc. 800 Highway 10 S.E., St. Cloud, Minnesota 56304 submitted the lowest bid in the amount of $242,581.93. All bids were checked for accuracy and tabulated. As can be noted on the attached form, the Engineer's Estimate was $289,753. We recommend award of the contract to R.L. Larson Excavating, Inc. in the amount of $242,581.93. Attached is the Bid Tabulation. Very truly yours, ORO SCHEI,GN•MAYERON aASSOCIATESNC. � 0 .Dan Kling, P.E. Project Manager DK/cmw 05/90•com.rw cc: R.L. Larson Excavating, Inc. Q *Denotes Corrected Figure I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT TABULATION OF THE BIDS AS RECEIVED ON: DATE: jMay 18. 12 IL BY: MIA, '&I Dan . Kling OSM Comm. No. 4534.00 6 4535.00 0 BID TABULATION FOR STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS AND APPURTENANT WORK 7TH STREET AND MINNESOTA STREET PROJECT NO. 90-02 MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA BIDS OPENED: May 18, 1990 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON 11:00 A.M. & ASSOCIATES, INC. ADDENDUM BID TOTAL CONTRACTOR NOTED SECURITY BID R.L. Larson Excavating X 53 Bond $242,581.97 Annandale Contracting X 58 Bond $252,197.04 Redstone Contruction X 5% Bond $261,102.45 Buffalo Bituminous X 5% Bond $274,153.75 Latour Construction X 5% Bond $280,857.30 Northdale Construction X 5% Bond $297,166.30+ *Denotes Corrected Figure I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT TABULATION OF THE BIDS AS RECEIVED ON: DATE: jMay 18. 12 IL BY: MIA, '&I Dan . Kling OSM Comm. No. 4534.00 6 4535.00 0 RESOLUTION 90 - RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AUTHORIZING CONTRACT WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvement of 7th Street from Locust Street to Minnesota Street and Minnesota Street from the existing bituminous south of 6th Street to 7th Street, including construction of sanitary sewer, water main extensions and storm water drainage facilities and appurtenant work, bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Annandale Contracting $252,197.04 Buffalo Bituminous $274,153.75 LaTour Construction $280,857.30 Northdale Construction $285,943.30 Redstone Construction $261,102.45 R.L. Larson Exc. $242,581.93 AND WHEREAS, it appears that R.L. Larson Exc. is the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached contract with R.L. Larson Exc. In the name of the City of Monticello for the Improvement of 7th Street from Locust Street to Minnesota Street and Minnesota Street from the existing bituminous south of 6th Street to 7th Street, including contruction of sanitary sewer, water main extensions and storm water drainage facilities, according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Administrator. 2. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposit made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has boon signed. Adopted by the City Council this 29th day of May, 1990. Mayor City Administrator 0 Council Agenda - 5/29/90 Consideration of hirinq operator/mechanic for Public Works Department. (J.S.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: With the transfer of Richard Cline to the Water/Sewer Collection Department, we are left with a vacancy as an operator/mechanic ir. the Public Works Department. We placed an advertisement in the twin city and local papers and received 64 applications for the position. Out of the 64 candidates, a selection committee consisting of the City Administrator, myself, and Roger Mack, selected 8 individuals for interview. The interviews were concluded by Thursday afternoon, May 24. After careful deliberation and the checking of references, the selection committee recommends that the City Council hire Joseph Kovich of 220 Leighton Drive, Big Lake, to fill the vacancy of operator/mechanic. Mr. Kovich has a well-rounded background and has skills in areas covering almost all of the job description and should fit in well with very little training. It should be noted that the committee unanimously felt that Mr. Kovich was the most qualified individual for the position. There was some discussion about the fact that Pat Kovich, who is one of the deputy registrars at City Hall, is the wife of Joseph Kovich. The committee felt this was not a problem, as the departments are totally separate from each other. If the Council has a problem with this, we could select the commit.,.ee's second choice. As always, the hirinr, of the individual would be contingent upon passing the required City physical. Again, the position of operator/mechanic is a union position, and the individual would start at 808 of the current union wage for the first year, then jump to 908, and after 18 months would go to 1008. The current top wage is $11.82 per hour. a. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative would be to hire Mr. Joseph Kovich to fill the position of operator/mechanic contingent upon paasing of the City physical. 2. The second alternative would be to hire the committee's second choice. 3. The third altornative would be not to hire for the position or to look at other individuals. C I C. Council Agenda - 5/29/90 C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the City Administrator, Public Works Director, and Street and Park Superintendent that the City Council authorize hiring of Joseph Kovich as outlined in alternative il. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the job description for operator/mechanic. / 4 C OPERATOR/MECHANIC FOR STREET/PARKS DEPARTMENTS Nature of Work This is public works maintenance and repair work including a variety of duties ranging from unskilled manual labor to skilled mechanical work in the operation, maintenance, and servicing of vehicles and heavy equipment. work involves responsibility for the safe and efficient operation of varied tools and equipment used in the performance of public works construction and maintenance. Work also involves the performance of manual labor related to municipal street and park operations. work of this class is distinguished by the variety of asaignments undertaken, initiative required and equipment operated. Work is reviewed for acceptability in progress, through job performance evaluations, and observation of results obtained. work is performed under limited supervision of the Street/Parks foreman. Examples of work - Operate a variety of power operated tools, equipment, and vehicles engaged in public works maintenance, construction and repair activities. - Perform a variety of manual and skilled tasks including street swooping. grading, digging, loading and snow removal. - operate a front and loader in loading trucks and materials and anow, digging and shaping, assisting trucks with Curb cleanup of residential areas and performing other tasks as required in tho use of a loader as assigned. - Operate a road patrol in grading operations or snow and ice removal. - operate a truck plow in snow removal activities. - Operate welding and related equipment, jack hammers, chain news, compressors and other power equipment; keep work areas clean and orderly, maintain stock room and inventory. rol t� - operate a roller in tarring streets, lawn movers and snow blowers, and park equipment. Perform carpentry duties and mechanical repair, servicing and maintenance duties on all city equipment as required. 46 - Repairs, adjust hydraulic systems; replace hydraulic motors, hoses and fittinga. - Repair and adjust drive, brake, steering, electrical, cooling and related systems as required on light and heavy equipment. - Replace regulators, alternators, starters, wiring, gauges and other components as required. - Perform minor tune-ups and rebuild equipment to meet special uses. - occasionally direct the work of temporary, seasonal, and other employees as required. - Attend training programs for mechanics, operators, and other public worke'related duties. - Perform other work as required. Desirable Qualifications Traininqand Experience A combination substantially equivalent to public works experience including the operation, maintenance and repair of a variety of heavy and light equipment used in municipal street and park operations. - valid class "e" State of ninneacta driver's license. - Relevant experience or training equivalent to a practical working knowledge of maintaining and servicing light and heavy equipment. - A high school education or GED equivalent. - Residency within the corporate city limits is not a requirement, but in the event that all other qualifications are equal, added weight will be given to this factor. Raowiedgee, Abilities, and Skills - Considerable knowledge of the principles of operation and servicing of heavy equipment including the adaptations and specialized In uses to which equipment can be put in meeting emergency or other unusual conditions. - Knowledge of the traffic laws, ordinances, and regulations involved in equipment operation. Knowledge of the occupational hazards involved and the safety precautions necessary in equipment operation. - Knowledge of the practices, methods, tools and materials used in the maintenance and repair of automotive, maintenance, construction, and related equipment. - Knowledge of the operating principles of gasoline and diesel engines, and of mechanical components of automotive, maintenance, construction, and related equipment. - Ability to perform welding, painting, and carpentry tasks incidental to other assignments. - Ability to perform manual labor associated with major mechanical work in related equipment. - Ability to establish and maintain effective working relationships and to understand and follow oral and written communi:ationa. - Skill in the operation and servicing of a variety of public works maintenance equipment and to perform a variety of maintenance, repair and construction assignments related to street and park operations. Physical Requirements - The individual must be in excellent health as a variety of tasks at times can require heavy lifting, bonding, climbing, and exposure to severe weather conditions. Sound safety practices shall be a requirement for this position, along with an ability to perform for extended periods of time in emergency situations. ft Council Agenda - 5/29/90 7. Consideration of hiring qroundskeeper/janitor. (J.S.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Tom Schumacher, who had filled the City's permanent part-time position of groundskeeper/ janitor for many years, is unable to continue in the position due to a severe medical problem with his knee. We had hoped that Tom would be able to recover and come back to work, but this does not appear likely. Tom's position became a part of the union at the request of the Minnesota Department of Labor with an amendment to the contract in 1989. Full pay for the position was $6.40 per hour plus $.25 per mile for vehicle use and pro -rated health, holiday, and vacation benefits. Based upon the union contract with an 18 -month pay step, this individual would start at 808 of the top wage. This job is somewhat unique in that the hours vary significantly from season to season, and the job is basically 365 days per year, which includes cleaning, closing, and opening of restrooms. This often means an hour of work around 9:00 p.m. in the evening as well as holidays and Sundays. Our hopes were to find an individual that would be able to stay in the position for some time and not someone who was looking for simply a summer job. After placing advertisements in the local papers, we received 12 applications for the job and recommend that the City hire Mr. John Lukach of 222 Kjellbergs Park in Monticello. John has a background in the building and grounds maintenance field. Upon approval by the City Council, we would schedule the required physical next week and have John start as soon as pobsible. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative would be to hire Mr. John Lukach of Monticello, Minnesota, for the position of groundskeoper/ janitor contingent upon passing of the City required physical. 2. The second alternative would be not to hire Mr. Lukach but to look at hiring another individual or other method of completing the work Involved. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director and Park and Street Superintendent that the City Council hire Mr. John Lukach as outlined in alternative N1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Wv Copy of the job description for groundskeeper/janitor. O� S �� JOB DESCRIPTION GROUNDS -KEEP ER/J AN ITOR This is an unskilled to a semi -skilled position within the Public Works Department, City of Monticello. The grounds-keeper/janitor is responsible for care and minor maintenance of grounds, buildings, and equipment in various departments, City of Monticello. The grounds-keeper/janitor will generally be attached to one specific department for any given Period of time. The work is performed under the supervision of a superintendent of the City of Monticello. This is a temporary and/or seasonal position. Duties: The grounds-keeper/janitor sliull perform such tasks as the following: a. Mowing and trimming of grass. b. Trimming hedges, brush, and trees. C. Seeding, planting, and snow and ice removal. d. Minor repairs to fences, walkways, gates, etc. o. Cleaning of buildings and structures including painting where necessary. f. Cleaning and maintenance of interior of buildings and/or structures including minor maintenance of equipment. g. Cleaning and minor mnintenance of motor vehicles and equipment. h. The grounds-keepar/janitor shall assist Clue other employees of the City of Monticello in performance of their duties. This assistance, however, shall be on a limited basis. i. Ile or she shall perform other duties an required. Desirable Qualifications: Education: A high school graduate of: GED equivalent. Experience: some axpariance in grounda-keeping and janitorial work. An individual with a knowledge of the equipment and tools needed in janitorial and light maintenance work. physical Demands. Ilio applicant must bo in excellent hoalth, as soma strenuous physical labor is at timan required along with the normal walking and lifting. Some exposure to hazardous areas In poealblo. Safety_, Safety is a requirement in this position, as the varied work areas each present apocific problems. O Council Agenda - 5/29/90 s. Consideration of adoptinq process governing information submittal for variances, conditional use permits, and zoning ordinance amendment applications. (J.0.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Attached you will find a proposed schedule or process governing information submittals for variances, conditional use permits, and zoning ordinance amendment applications. The need for formalizing this process stems from problems associated with the tardy submittal of information by applicants to City staff, which reduces our ability to properly review land use proposals and limits our ability to complete the Planning Commission/City Council agenda supplements on a timely basis. Adherence to the schedule by applicants as proposed will allow City staff to do our job better. City staff requests that Council ratify this schedule, which gives staff firm footing when we deny placement of an application on an agenda because the information is incomplete or late. Please note that the policy includes the ability to override the schedule with the approval of the Mayor and the City Administrator, which allows a special item to be placed on the agenda without the standard notice. This schedule will be given to each applicant at the first contact the applicant makes with the City. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt policy governing information submittals for variances, conditional use permits, and zoning ordinance amendment applications. 2. Motion to deny adoption of said policy. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the policy be adopted. Following this policy may not always be easy, as there will be many occasions when we will be asked to bend the rules for an applicant that just can't quite make the deadlines. It Is possible that strict adhoronco to this schedule will result in phone calls and complaints to Council Members and the Mayor. At the same time, however, the added review time that is created by this schedule enables staff to do its job better, which will result In loss potential for staff mistakes and oversights when doing plan reviews. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the proposed policy statement. 6 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS DEADLINES AND DETAILS The City of Monticello has established a process for review of conditional use permits, zoning ordinance amendments, and variance request applications. The schedule enables the City to achieve Its goal of providing timely and professional review of applications. Please review the schedule closely and schedule your activity accordingly. Applications that fail to meet the information requirements and timelines as noted will be continued to the next cycle. Any deviation from this schedule requires approval from the Mayor and the City Administrator. 1. In order to meet public hearing notice deadlines, applications must be submitted no later than .4430—on the second Friday of each month. (/0J 01�- 3,—( m I-V Application material should be of sufficient detail to allow precise determination of variance or zoning ordinance amendment request. Final site plan information is not necessary on this date. 2. Final site plan information for Staff and Planning Commisslon review shall be delivered to staff no later than A -'O on the third Fx-J4" of each month. 3. Planning Commission public hearings are conducted at 7:30 p.m. on the first Tuesday of each month. %-3 4. City Council considers these matters at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Council. Council meetings are hold on the second and fourth Monday of each month. PCSCHEDt4/10/90 0 Council Agenda - 5/29/90 9. Consideration of establishing a fee for special meetinqs of the Planninq Commission and consider providing compensation to Planninq Commission members that attend special meetinqs. (J.O.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission requests that Council consider establishing a special fee to be charged to all applicants requesting a special meeting of the Planning Commission for review of variance, conditional use permit, or zoning ordinance amendment. The purpose of the fee is to discourage developers from requesting special meetings and to provide funds to cover the added cost of conducting special meetings. In addition, the fee revenue could be used to compensate Planning Commission members for their attendance at special meetings. An occasional special meeting has not been a problem for the Planning Commission; however, in the past few years, the frequency of the special meetings has been increasing to an uncomfortable level. Although none of the Planning Commission members have indicated that they have lost interest in continuing on the Commission due to special meetings, they have a concern that too many special meetings might discourage continued service. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to approve establishment of a $500 fee for special meetings of the Planning Commission and approve payment of $50 to Planning Commission members as compensation for attendance at special meetings of the Planning Commission. Special meeting agenda and dates are to be approved by the Chairman of the Planning Commission and Assistant City Administrator. This is the alternative recommended by the Planning Commission. Planning Commission suggested that a $500 foe be charged for the special meetings for the following reasons: $500 is a sum that is significant enough to cause a developer to hesitate prior to asking for a special meeting. Council Agenda - 5/29/90 B. As you may know, the Planning Commission receives a monthly stipend of $50 for service on the Commission. It is also proposed that Planning Commission members receive an additional $50 for each special meeting attended. The $500 fee could be used to fund the additional stipend that Planning Commission members receive when they attend a special meeting. C. After paying the Planning Commission from the special meeting fee revenue, $250 of the fee would remain in the City coffers to offset the City cost associated with the special meeting. The amount exceeds the City's actual cost; however, to reduce the special meeting fee may defeat one of the reasons for the fee, which is to discourage special meetings. If Council selects this alternative, information regarding the special meeting policy could be placed in the application process policy statement. 2. Motion to deny adoption of special meeting fee. Council could take the position that the City should simply reduce the number of special meetings by not scheduling them. Under this scenario, developers would be forced to wait until the next meeting cycle to have their land use issue addressed. Council could also look at holding more than one regular meeting of the Planning Commission per month. Planning Commission does not support this concept. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff agrees with the Planning Commission recomJnendation. D. SUPPORTING DATA: None. � A 8 Council Agenda - 5/29/90 10. Consideration of authorizinq purchase of base radio for office of Public Works Department. (J.S.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: With the move to the new office of Public Works, the existing radio at the public works shop is not easily accessible to the supervisors. The hand-held walkle talkies, while working well from site to site, are not able to transmit easily from one end of town to the other; therefore, it is often necessary to walk next door to the shop or find one of the city vehicles to use a radio to contact one of the crew members. During the preparation of the 1990 budget, we placed an amount of $1,600 in the shop and garage budget to buy a base radio and antenna. We recently discussed the installation with Audio Communications of Big Lake. This is the firm that does all of the City's maintenance on our radios. They indicated that it would be much cheaper for the City to purchase a mobile type unit with an AC adapter system for our base radio, and it would function just as well as a base unit and would allow us some flexibility in the future. The complete unit with installation of the antenna would cost $753, thereby saving in excess of $800 over the budget line item. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: The first alternative is to authorize the purchase of a Kenwood mobile/base unit and antenna for the office of Public Works from Audio Communications of Big Lake, Minnesota, for $753. 2. The second alternative would be not to purchase the mobile/baso unit at this time but to continue utilizing our existing system. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is tho recommendation of the Public Works Diroctor and Stroet and Park Superintendent that the City authorize the purchase of a mobilo/baso unit for the offico of Public Works as outlined in altornativo NI at a cost of $753. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of spec shoot and quoto from Audio Communications. 9 JOB INVOICE AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS 751 ROSE DRIVE NO. BIG LAKE, MN 55309 PHONE OAT E.-C1y �� 161212633582 a METRO (612) 4279464 MAKE MODEL FAX: 16121 2637811 SERIAL NO, P.O. NO. t, ^ d�I 2 ��/� JOB NAME JOB LOCATION TO: V "((( O • / JOB PHONE STARTING DATE ]nEVEDATE _ CASH C.O.D. TERMS: _WARRANTY _ VISAWC , Trouble Reported end/or Special Instructions: _CONTRACT _ CHARGE JK %of S u!/ll lC3�Se SSS= yCe w or '4 !M13S-/S-o /3/)5c A­f— %p„o -57 7-4 // iT' b/o I 6,, 19 k / Y- S_D /�� e 9rem /V o -� C_- �f -m - TOTAL OTHER 7a I TIME EJ SITE O SHOP SERVICE CALL CHARGE PICK UP OR DELIVER MILEAGE pATI'. C(W'Lf.l1:U 1 � SHIPPING& INSURANCE � TOTAL LABOR 11CHNICIAN TOTAL MA7 FRIA L9 - ! /D'SB�— TOTAL MATERIALS % 6lf1NA TUHC TOTAL OTHER ( TAX B'enpl •Trove wprA •. b-0 Yll�leptprr end In•1 .uulnm•nt nn been TeII rngood c—dltlon. , e0 TOTAL All diWete• must be Mtil d w1min 30 devil. ' `-- 1 •V•,W,l All I•ppr p•rler mad nwerr•med IDI io der s. MJ O KENWOOD TK-705/TK-805 Compact Synthesized FM Two -Way Radios ). ►a l.: L 11J rL, J 1 i i. r""611irl i .W: i��: r� l�i:� iil�)� 1•^i��..i•'� %� ►�l �: The KENWOOD TK -705 VHF and TK -805 UHF compact synthesized dash -mount mobile radios are specifically designed to deliver maximum performance and operating convenience in a design that offers a more ultra -compact package than ever before! The inherent strength of die-cast chassis construction, the use of only the highest quality parts and sub -assemblies, the basic design utilizing the latest technology in solid-state electronics and microprocessors, coupled with a rigid adherence to the most demanding quality control standards in production, assure the ultimate in product performance and reliability. The KENWOOD TK -705 and TK -805 meet the market demands of compact mobile radios in quality, ruggedness, and flexibility of application. The TK -705 and TK -805 carry a factory -backed one-year warranty on parts and labor. [Features and Benefits] Ultra -Compact and Lightweight Measures only 551 (140)W * 1.58 (40111 . 834 (1610 inch (rani) and weighs only 2.20 lbs (1.0 kg) lot marinrurn IleuUilly of installation, Fils anywhere in the vehicle, Dio-Cast Chassis Healsink Construction The final amplthei stage of the 1 K-705 and IK -B05 is nnounled directly on its die-cast healsvnl, lot manmum If ermal conduction efficiency. I hgh-impacl molded (tart panel and metal covers provide lasling beauty plus alta protaction lot electronic chcuiby. Synthesized 16-channal (Soni -Duple■) Capability Synthesized channel frequency genetalion provides up to 18 semi -duplex channels Ila stale -of -all synthesved design provides maumum flp- Nilly, and allows the dealer to acid or change channels quickly without Ilia installation ul new PROMS, Wideband Channel Frequency Spread I Ile design of Ilse radio enables Illq unnsmruer and the re[aiver to Spend 24 MI Iz on vi IF and 20 Mllr on UHF. This tall ie allows nuPrmun) Ile,,it)rhly in system designs involving h1uthple Channel onaahllns, Dio-Call Chassis/Hoslaink, MIL-STD8I OC 8 D Ruggedness With tugged die -Cast chassisn)entsmk [onSiluCtion, Ilia IK -705 and IK -805 nneel the sovem MIL -SID 8ICC 6 D SpeelI1Cnt10n3 ler shock and vibialicir1, Largo, Easy -To -Road LCD Display A large LCD display provides clam visrhrhly in direct sunlight ar allerdnik. It indicates operating channels, It nFisnul, busy, monitor and squelch, ovr High RF Output Power (25 watts) 25 watts or RF output power assures reliable communications and is adjustable to any rower between 5 and 25 walls Heavy -Duly Professional Microphone The ruggedly built, high-quality microphone is designed with a telephone-slyle connector and heavy-duty cable to protect against laiture High - Per formanco Roceive/Tianamil Design Outstanding sensitivity, seleclivily, and reliability assure dependable communications under the most severe operating conditions Built -In Timo-0u1-Timer and Busy Channel Lock -Out Progianvnnhle luno -out -tinier and busy channel lockout hiplove system operating efficiency, esp(:cially it, it Inige mull -user system. Cloning Fledbillty Cloning they be easily accomplished by the dealer's technician using n cloning cable t)elween two radios This p55uics quick and [failure dealer support. Buill-In OT Tono Coded Squelch Built-in Ol "QUIET - TALK" continuous tone cudad squelch system circus elumnales unwanted signals born other parties using the sante channel, you hear only those messages daecled to your 01 tam hequeney. A multiple Ione capability per ehantler allows makinatm fl(! i0-1ly m channel coordination, Easy-lo-Oporate Pro-Sel Squelch with ON/OFF switch Pie -set squelch with ONIDrF switch on Ilia fiord panel provides actor Inondly operation. Man Ouslily Snaakor II�lY:�l��•'9YY:fl:i1Ym►F.'g - -1�IQI �� KMC-2A 5011 Nolen Cancelling Microphone 111.105: 150- 114 Mllt !r"���:IOlit1:1��/_��l�l�.`fJ�l�l�ll�l_10Y ��►1• 20 dB Quieting 4 70 _,90m,., 400Mlll 400 - 512 MI It (GENERAL) 5011 frequency Rarngo: 111.105: 150- 114 Mllt EIA 12 dB SINAD I K•805: 4116- ,30M ITI 450- 470 MI17 20 dB Quieting 4 70 _,90m,., 400Mlll 400 - 512 MI It Nunau)r al channels: 10 ,on,' Aupler, Channa15 Channel Spacing K-705.:)kill Soloct.ey: IPLI, channel slap 5 kill) Intormoduratron: IK -805:25 kill Spinous and lmaga Rejection: (PLL channel step 12.5kill) Input Vamgo: 130 VDC negative ground Current Drum: 0 3 A on slmxlUy 0 7 A on receive Channel rfearip.my Spend: 00 A on hnnsmrl Duly Cyoln: naceiver IOU%lmnsmntar 20% Icmlx`mtwo Range: -30'C m 160'C 1-22.1" to 4 140'(1 Drnrerlsrm5 & Warght: 5 51 1140) W ` 1,58 (40) 11 0 34 1101) D 5011 inch lrnrn12.201bs (1,0 kg) FCC IDICompronco 1K-105: ALIIIK.10511150-174 Will 131.. 1.5 kl It for IOU% at 10001 it FCC Pans 22. 74 and 90 ,19 I K 805: AI.I II K•805� 1 1450-470 k9111 W.—mlnm:n AI.111 K�805 2 14 70-400 -111) 1%a1 100010 AI III K 805J UDO-512 Mlit) :LO 0005%horn -3U'C to 160•C AL1(( K 805.4 (400-430 MI V ) 74 MI 11 UK- 7051.20 Mill 4IK 805) I CC Parte 22.74, 90, and 05 1450-470 0,1141 modul) KPS•t0A DC Power Supply The KPS IOA is a regulated DC bower supply designed to provide n reliable base slauon 01nma0n KES'3 External Speaker KMC'9 Baso Microphone KLF•2 Lino Flitar 10 sllppres9 SP alleelala.hme. 25 dB ollenuatwn. 25 A I a (RECEIVER) (Measuiemenls mean per CIA slandald LIA-204.Cl Rf Input Impodance. 5011 $easnway: EIA 12 dB SINAD O2 AV 20 dB Quieting 03PV Spualch So—many: 025 AV Ihrashold MfdulOilen ACceplanco: i7 kilt Soloct.ey: -80d0 Intormoduratron: -75dB Spinous and lmaga Rejection: -90 dB IF K-705). -85 ISO 01( 005) At..a fewer Output: 4 walls 01 411 loss than 5%dlstortgn frequency $Inberly: 100005%hen) —30'C l0 180'C Channel rfearip.my Spend: 24 MIV I1 K. 705). 70 Mi it (I K-8051 (TRANSMITTER) (Manwamanls mean par GIA stam.,d CIA. 152 B) RI llo.er outml: 75.0115 adluslable to 5.0116 11( Output Impadanca: 5011 Spuims and l lofmonres: —70 dD(I K. 705),-75 dB 0K-8051 Modulolran' 131.. 1.5 kl It for IOU% at 10001 it 1 M N-10;-50 ,19 Microphune..peciOnce: W.—mlnm:n Audio Dlsl.t*n: 1%a1 100010 (mquemy Stability. :LO 0005%horn -3U'C to 160•C Ch.mp,l Frequency Spread: 74 MI 11 UK- 7051.20 Mill 4IK 805) Anplopnle MIL. -SID 8100 Mllihtrds/Prpce(lurm 8101) Mathoda/Procedures $nock Methud 510 7 PIX00" 05 I, 2. J. 5 Method 516 3 rhocodures 1, 4, 5, 0 Vlbrolen Me ho,l 514,2 Pral:Odum 8 Method 514 3 procedure 1 Applicable onvnfnrlonhul EIA Standard CIA 152C. 704C Shock. Vibration. 14 Wily I it, KENWOOD USA. CORPORATION COMMUNICOITIONS & TEST EOUIPMENT GROUP PO BM 2274& 2201 East Ocmrqum St.. lung Beet, CA WWI .5745 A788 (K) 900110 U 0 Primed in Japan Ah - Council Agenda - 5/29/90 tt. Consideration of approving gamblinq license renewal --American Leqion Club. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The American Legion Post /260 has submitted its gambling license renewal application for their gambling activities at the Legion Club. The renewal will be effective August 1, 1990, and will be automatically granted unless the City Council serves notice t -.the Gambling Board that it does not approve issuance of this License. Enclosed with your agenda you will find a summary report listing the gross revenues, prizes awarded, and charitable contributions made by the Legion Club from their past year's activities. There are two separate disclosures, one coverl.ng activities the Legion Club had at the Monticello Liquor establishment and the Legion Club, and now one with just the American Legion Club, as they no longer have a gambling operation at Monticello Liquor. If the Council has no opposition to this license being renewed, no action is needed by the Council other than acknowledgement of the license ( application. `• D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the application; Copies of revenues and expenditures. 10 df"_:" , Department o1 Revenue - Gaming Division Mail Station 3315 t Far acarol Use Only St. Paul, MN 55146.3315 F Paid Amt. µ` (612) 267.5300 Chock No. Dale: GAMBLING LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LICENSE NUMBER: 114"17 to] IEFF.OATE: ontn]P'e IAMOUNT OF FEE: 1t" ` 1. Applicant -Legal Name of Organization 2. Street Address PtIPI(AN Hilo" Foil` 'I'll /N1111rNIn 11 fin tt 3. City. State, Zip 4. County 5. Business Phone tcnt)telle NN 55162 rrlghl ( Flt 1 'lt "yd 6. Name of Chief Executive Officer 7. Business Phone Steve lsldets I y• ;sr. 1x 11 9. Name of Treasurer or Person Who Accounts for Revenues 0. Business Phone tin stlktn ( Ft' 1 :7t 'FSI 10. Name of Gambling Manager I I. Band Number 12. Business Phone dines rifts t14t Ford ( " ' 1 -4 13, Name of Establishment Where Gambling WIN Take Place 14. County 15. No. of Active Members OR (felon post tF1 3cot(t-110 Ii'llkt 1ee 10. Lessor Name 17, Monthly Rent; to 18. It Bingo will be conducted with this license. please specify days end limes of Bingo. Days Times I Days Times I Days Times 10 Has license ever been: Ll Revoked Dale, L1 Suspended Dale, 1) Denied Date, 20 Have internal controls been submitted proviouely? l] Yes D No (11 'No," allach copy) 21 Has currenl tease been filed with the board? l) Yes U No (11 'No,' allach copy) '2 Has current sketch been filed with the board? 11 Yes to No fit 'No.' ellach copy) GAMBLING SITE AUTHORIZATION By my Signature below, local law enlacement offkns or agents of the Board are hereby authorized to enter upon the site, at any time, gambling Is being conducted. to obesnla the gambling and to enforce the law for any unauthorized gems or practice. BANK RECORDS AUTHORIZATION By my Npnaluis below, the Board 1s hereby authorized to Inspect the bank records of the General Gambling Bank Account whenever necessary to fullill requirements of current gambling rules and taw OATH I hereby doctors that: 1. 1 have read this applkallon and ani Information submitted to the Board: 2, AN Information Submitted Is true, accurate and complete; 3. AN other required Information has been fully disclosed; 4. 1 am the chief executive officer of the organization; B. 1 assume fug responsibility for the fair and lawful operation of IN activities Id be conducted; 0. 1 will famrNarize myeell with the laws of the State of Minnesota respecting gambling and rules of the board and agree, It Nceneed, to abloe by than Iowa and rules, including amendments thereto. 23, Official Legal Name of Organization I Signature (Chief Executive Olficar) Date I Td10 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF NOTICE BY LOCAL GOVERNING BODY I hereby acknowledge rocalpt W a copy of this applkition By acknowledging mcelpl, 1 odmN having been Served with notks that this appNci lion will be rwiewild by the Charkable Gambllop Cordrol Dowd aro N approved by the f3ooid, will become eNeclive 00 days from the dam of retmlpt (noted below), union a resokNlon of the local governing body 10 Passed which specifically disallows Such so" and a copy W that resoaNlon 10 received by N Chal.1able Gambling Control Board within 60 days Of the Wkw noted data 24 CuylCoumy/Name (Local Governing Body) Township 11 eNe b located wNhln a township, please 0"010 4411111124 �E IJ.4/ r �t i.. -Yt /�L' and 25 Bgnature of Por Recelvhg ApNKnien 13. I4gnstwe of Person Receiving Application Ale, ) / . Data Regshrod (NW dale begin e0 day pariOdl 1.110 Name of Poison Oeltverhng Application to Local Governing Body Township Name CU*=141 NMI While Copy Board Canary--Appe;am Pink- Local Governing Body AMERICAN LEIGION POST 0260 � GROSS SALES PRIZES P^|n INTEREST EARNED OVER/SHORT ' TOTALS STATE TAX PAID FEDERAL TAX PAID TOTAL TAX PAID TOTAL GROSS LESS TAX EXPENSES GOODS USED ^ C0nP[wS*T\Om ACCOUNTING, LEGAL SERVICES ADv[AT0w6.MISC. CHARGES ^ nIwT UTILITIES EQUIPMENT l` BOND, LICENSES � TOTAL EXPENSES TOTAL NET PROFIT LAWFUL PURPOSE CONTRIBUTIONS BUILDING EXPENSES ` LEGION PROGRAMS. FLAGS ETC. SCHOOL PATROL LEGION BASEBALL ` HOSPITAL, SR. CITIZENS, NURSING HOME FOOD SHELF, EMERGENCY AID, MEMORIALS SCHOOL PROGRAMS YOUTH SPORTS, PROGRAMS MEDICAL PROGRAMS, HANDICAP AID ' COMMUNITY GROUPS . SCHOLARSHIPS ^ PROPERTY TAXES ^ TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS NET AFTER CONTRIBUTIONS � $3.06,343 $2,65/,6b| $2,775 *s16]2a $)07,67J $|5O.5O0 $49.859 $76,723 $34,165 $o,34« $*2VV $1,2O| $3.525 */O4,695 $3.052 $3,255 $w.i>7 $5,400 $|,7OO $8,400 $/V.7OO $1.|36 $*,4OO $|8.0VV $7,237 / Council Agenda - 5/29/90 12. Consideration of qamblinq license renewal --VFW Club. (R. W. A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The VFW Club in Monticello has submitted a gambling license renewal application for your consideration. Enclosed you will also find a summary of the revenue and expenses pertaining to their gambling operation from May 1989 through April 1990. If the City Council does not have any opposition to this license being renewed, no action is necessary by the Council, and it will automatically be considered by the Gambling Board. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of annual summary. M do"4+q. Department of Revenue • Gaming Division �i� T = Mail Statim 3315 i SI. Paul, MN 55146.3315 �?5 (612) 297.5300 For Board Use Only Paid Amt: Check No. Date: GAMBLING LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LICENSE NUMBER: 11-f13S7-111 I EFF. DATE: IR111119 I AMOUNT OF FEE: I. Applicant—Legal Name of Organizaxen 2. Street Address YTO POST Bill BOBTIC1110 5:1 Ceder St for 712 3. City, State. Zip 4. County I Rentllelle. Is SS362 Ilricht B. Name of Chief Executive OIIKer Borden Tariff B. Name of Treasurer or Person Who Accounts for Revenues 6terle 0elthevl 10. Name of Gambling Managert t, Bond Number Cdvsrd lostl t'4417s1 13. Name of Establishment Where Gambling WJ1 Take Place t4. County vFV Pett 6131 Rentitelle Ilr1TAt 16. Lessor Name IS. 11 Bingo will be Conducted with this ticonse. Please specify days and times of Bingo. Days Times I pays Trmas ) IfN'lly S. Business Phone ( 617 1 2cr•rTs? 7. Business Phone ( tl? 1 :!S -'PIS 0. Business Phone ( Bis,' ) 12. Business Phone 15. No. of Active Members -r1T 17. Monthly Rent: to Days. Times 19. Has license ever been: 0 Revoked Dale: N0 O Suspended Date: AJd 0 Denied Date- �rvo 20. Have internal controls Wen submitted previously? PtYes 0 No Of 'No.- attach copy) 21, Has current fate been filed with the board? 0 Yes 0 No (I1'No; attach copy) 22, IW Current sketch been filed with the board? CKYes 0 No (If Yeo; anach copy) GAMBLING SITE AUTHORIZATION ,Ery apnalure below, local law anforcemem officers or agents of the Board are hereby authorized to enter upon the We, at any time, gambling Is bung conducted, to observe the gambling and to enforce the law for any unauthorized game or practice. BANK RECORDS AUTHORIZATION By my signature below. The Board Is hereby authorized to Inspect the bank records of the General Gambling Bank Account whenever necessary to Iutlill rapuiremems of currem gambling rules and law. OATH 1 hereby declare Thal: I. 1 hove read this application and all information submbtted to the Board; 2. AN information submlUed Is true, accurate and compete: 3. All other required Information las been fully disclosed: 4. 1 am IM Chief exeCutivs officer of the organitatlon; 5 1 assume Iu0 responsibility for the Iain and lawful operation of ax eclivities to be conducted; 6. 1 will familiarize myself with the laws of the $tate Of Minnesota respecting gambling and rides of [hs board and agree, if licensed, t0 ablde by [hogs laws and rules, including amandrnems thereto, 23 Official Legal Name of Organization Signature (Chief Eeecutive Officer) Dora TitleU, W,POSr 873/ �ee.iriezija A.,/1.,. l t•7 -4o 4. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF 119TICIVIBY LOCAL GOVERNING BODY 1 hereby acknowledge recalpl 01 a loopy Of 11111 epplka110n, Dy eckrhowledgknp recalpl, 1 sdmx hevgp been weed with notice pat this appOCatbn wig be rov4ewef3 by the Charitable Gambling CwW loard and If approved by the Boyd, will become effective BO days from me dais of receipt (road below). unless a resoWtion of ee local govermrlg body is Passed which opeciflcasy dleallows such activity and a copy of Nat resolution is received by the Charitable Ganeeu'g Control Board within 00 days of the below holed date 24 CirylCounty Name (Local Governing BWy) Township' ll axe Is Wiled within a towns fp, please Complete Mems 24 F YVl nvn 1 / , B t, 0 and 25' _s7luro of Person Receiving Application: 25 Signature of Portion Recehing Appi ation Data Realved j(tMa�,Ma begins 80 ay period) Title ase of Person Delivering Application to Local Governing Body. Township Name CG40o22-01(449) While Copy -061,0 Canary—Applicam Pink—Local Ooverrwlopmv �L SUMMARY OF MONTICELLO VFW GAMBLING LICENSES Or LAWFUL GROSS NET STATE EXPENSES 8 ACCUMULATED RECEIPTS PRIZES RECEIPTS TAXES EXPENSES DONATIONS BALANCE May 1989 $152,434.00 $129,751.00 $22,683.00 $2,972.00 $6,945.00 514,156.00 $53,823.00 jJuno 1989 $144,177.00 $122,588.00 $21,589.00 $2,543.44 $5,730.00 $8,998.00 $58.141.00 1July 1989 $139.901.00 $119.664.00 520,237.00 $2.121.75 $6.292.00 S14,189.00 $55,775.25 Aug 1989 $127,141.00 $108.724.00 $18,417.00 $2.555.85 $5,737.00 $16,106.00 $49,793.40 Sept 1989 $175,757.50 $150.191.00 $25.566.50 $3,941.09 $6,848.57 $16,392.04 $48.178.20 Oct 1989 $178.545.00 $151,072.00 $27,545.00 $3.415.00 $11,718.00 $20,177.06 $40,413.00 Nov 1989 $153,953.91 $130.875.00 S23.078.91 $2,373.41 $5.838.07 $10,223.75 $45,056.58 Doc1989 $t 66,079.93 $140,515.00 $25,564.93 $4,078.57 $5,297.86 $3,907.40 $57,337.68 Jan 1990 $173,787.90 $146,490.00 $27,297.90 $5,247.28 $6,996.62 $4,633.99 $67,757.69 Feb 1990 $147,200.38 $123,708.50 $23,491.88 $5.699.88 $5,599.07 $20,700.51 $59,198.11 Mar 1990 1 $151,495.16 $126,163.50 $23,331.66 $10,067.30 $7,018.93 $7,930.22 $53,513.32 Apri11990 $153,184.66 $129,558.00 $23.626.66 S12,128.71 $6,444.87 S16,307.70 $42,258.70 TOTAL $1,863,657.44 $1,579,300.00 $282,429.44 $57,144.28 $80,465.99 S153.721.67 $42,258.70 Or $153,721.67 9 VFW LAWFUL EXPENSES AND DONATIONS MAY 1989 - APRIL 1990 Dept. of Minnesota VFW (Early Childhood Center Fund) $1,000.00 Children Heart Fund 1,000.00 Muscular Dystrophy Association 500.00 Drug Program 605.00 Gun Safety Program 500.00 Scholarship Foundation b Education Grant 7,250.00 Camp Confidence 1,000.00 Monticello Summer Swim Program 1,000.00 Minnesota Special Olympics 6,000.00 Minnesota Make a Wish 1,040.00 Monticello Senior Citizen 1,500.00 Center Court Basketball Club 1,000.00 VA Hospital . 500.00 Minnesota Vietnam Vets Memorial 500.00 Monticello Junior Golf Training 1,000.00 Monticello Youth Baseball Program 5,000.00 Atoms Wrestling Club 1,000.00 Monticello Graduation Party 1,000.00 Monticello Youth Hockey 6,500.00 Monticello Rod b Gun Club 1,500.00 Monticello Lions 1,000.00 Pinewood Elementary Playground Equipment 15,000.00 National Close Up Foundation 1,796.00 VFW Cancer Endowment Fund Alzheimers Association 500.00 400.00 Leukemia Society 1,600.00 Camp Friendship 2,000.00 Monticello -Big Lake Nursing Home 4,832.00 (TV's, paved walkway, etc.) Youth Fishing Clinic 700.00 Multiple Sclerosis 2,085.00 Veterans on the Lake 1,000.00 VA Medical Center 1,500.00 wheelchairs - 2 2,875.20 Baseball Uniforms & Equipment, etc. 6,071.73 KMOM--Ad for High School Sports 1,440.00 Pheasants Preservation, Inc. 1,000.00 Functional Industries 1,000.00 Land of Lakes Girl Scout Council 2,565.00 Wright County Treasurer (real estate taxes) 13,400.86 Wright County State Bank (bldg. add. payment) 32,400.00 IRS (payroll 6 W/H taxes 6 other taxes due) 8,927.55 Insurance Premium 1,387.00 Repairs 1,540.00 Other (aid 6 donations to various organizations and people) $ 9,306.33 $153,721.67 9 L", L Council Agenda - 5/29/90 13. Information --The Ride Across Minnesota --Preliminary Plan. (J.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: As you know, the City will be playing overnight host to 1,000 cyclists on July 31, 1990. For the past few months, I have been working with a steering committee toward development of a plan for the day, which is attached for your review. The steering committee has done an excellent job, and the Chamber of Commerce is also taking on a major responsibility by managing the food delivery. Also, the Monticello Times is preparing and publishing much of the public information materials advertizing the event. Please review the plan for more detail. I look forward to hearing any comments you might have. There is still plenty of time to make adjustments. D. SUPPORTING DATA: TRAM 250 Plan; Steering committee membership list. In PROJECT STATUS REPORT MONTICELLO TRAM 250 MAY 21, 1990 CAMPGROUND Responsibility: Duane Gates/Monticello School District It was determined that the recreation area adjacent to the High School would be the site of the campground facilities. In addition, the shower and restroom facilities located in the school would be made available to the riders. In addition to outside camping, an option would be provided to riders wishing to camp inside. This option, however, might require a fee. It was felt that the High School would be the best option because of location. In addition, the High School proved the best option for serving breakfast. The space in the recreation area is excellent. There is a lot of room, and the openness available is a positive feature. Duane Gates reported that the school showers will have sufficient hot water for all of the riders. I have been contacted by the firm contracted by the MS Society to provide hot showers at $2.00 per shower. This company will not set up shop if Monticello wants exclusive rights to the shower revenue. The vendor noted, however, that many of the riders do appreciate L the availability of a private shower, and the vendor also provides us with a backup in the event the school's showers turn cold. The committee should decide at the next meeting if we want to allow the competition into town. Remember, we had planned on using the shower revenue to pay for pre -trip mailings. SANITATION Responsibility: Jeff O'Neill, Roger Mack City staff will work with BFI Portable Services to arrange portable toilets in each community. Toilets will be put up in the campgrounds to supplement the permanent facilities. In general, City staff will be providing waste receptacles that will supplement those waste receptacles provided by BFI. The Boy Scout Troop, as directed by Chris Buckley, will be responsible for policing the camping and entertainment areas for litter. The Boy Scouts will also prepare small waste receptacles for placement in and around the camping area. TRAM250STATUS: 5/23/90 Page 1 V MEDICAL ASSISTANCE Responsibility: Glenn and Caren Nemec Glenn indicated that Hart Memorial Clinic will remain open longer that evening to service any riders that might need minor medical attention. Glenn has also organized an on-site medical service which includes a nurse and emergency medical technicians or paramedics with an ambulance. Glenn indicated that 3-4 people are interested in providing massages to weary riders. The steering committee indicated that a fee of $25 should be charged those providing massages for the opportunity to set up shop. BIKE FIELD Responsibility: Duane Gates It was determined that the tennis court area is not well suited for the bike field and that it should be located nearby in an area that can take advantage of existing fencing. It appears that there is a confined area near the track that has fencing on three sides that may be well suited for the bike field area with the addition of a snow fence on the fourth side. Chris Buckley will be organizing and managing the bike field operation. It was determined that an adult or deputy sheriff should be nearby to assist with policing the camping area and bike field area. ENTERTAINMENT Responsibility: Duane Gates The entertainment and food center will be located at Ellison Park. The "Red Wolf Dixie Land Band" has been booked by Community Education for the event. Other ideas for entertainment included opening up the Little Mountain Settlement and providing 50 cent movie night at either the High School Auditorium or possibly the commercial movie theater in town. The swimming pool will be open to all riders and general public at 2:30 PM. The Small Mouth Bass Alliance has boon contacted and has shown an interest in providing a short fishing seminar and will be providing other information about the Mississippi River habitat. They may also provide a fly-fishing demonstration. This is to occur in the late afternoon prior to the music program. TRAM250STATUS: 5/23/90 Page 2 The Wright County Historical Society may be conducting a historical riding tour of the city. Monticello Heartland Express will provide the transportation. This service will be for a small fee charged to participants. Details of this program are being worked out by the Historical Society. Other entertainment would include a talent show, opening up of the racketball court, the health club, and all the other commercial entertainment or recreational activities that are available. HOSPITALITY AND PUBLIC RELATIONS Responsibility: Jeff O'Neill, Bryan Swenson, Gregg Davies, Mary Micke It is important to really welcome the riders. Efforts should be made to get the word out to the public that the riders will be coming through and that the community should behave accordingly. An information booth will be set up near the campground area. The information booth will include a bulletin board so that messages can be attached by the riders. A single sheet mailing will be distributed to all riders one week or so prior to the event for the purpose of encouraging friends and relatives of riders to visit Monticello for the day. The mailing will outline activities and will include a map showing the way to town. It is proposed that the expense associated with the mailing be financed by the City and the School District with the possibility of the Chamber of Commerce participating. Revenue generated from shower charges will be used to reimburse the City and the School District. Bryan Swenson will be working on the design of the mailing which will focus on: 1. Activity schedule/entertainment/food/et cotera 2. Robert Leathers Play structure 3. Proximity - case of access 4. General statement regarding service availability 5. River location 6. Parking location/ transportation A printed handout will be doveloped by the Monticello Times in cooperation with the steering committee which will outline all the events that will be conducted in the city that day. The handout will be provided to the riders while they are in Paynesville, which will allow them to study the city program and determine what they want to do the coming day. In addition, the filer would also be included as a page in the local newspaper providing local citizens TRAM250STATUS: 5/23/90 Pago 3 /3 with information regarding the day's events. Included in the handout would be a map showing the location of community facilities, including telephones, showers, laundromat, instant cash machines, food and beverage providers, lodging, room rentals, hotels, etc. The Chamber of Commerce may be developing a commemorative T -Shirt with the City LOGO on the front and TRAM 250 on the back. INFORMATION BOOTH - Responsibility - Women of Today The concession stand at the athletic field will be the location of the information booth. Staffing the information booth will be the "Women of Today" organization. This organization will be providing at least 4 volunteers on duty at all times during the event. Christy DeMarais will be representing the Women of Today organization on the TRAM 250 steering committee. Some of the items to include with the information booth would be provisions for 1) a bulletin board; 2) additional telephones if possible; 3) P.A. system; 4) a map; 5) small maps and copies of the information sheet. It appears that it will not be feasible to set up a phone j bank; therefore, our information material should clearly show l where public phones are located. Power and lights. A secondary information booth could also be set up at Ellison Park which would need a portable phone or radio contact with primary information booth. 2) P.A. system provided by the band microphones. Signage showing location of information booths and other areas is important as well. INFORMATION SNEET Mary Micke will be working with the steering committee toward development of a 4-8 page information sheet which will be incorporated with an issue of the Monticello Times. M52 to .. — . . a .40 ft — r.. a r - .- UQUIt • Schedules have not allowed development of the map by the next meeting scheduled for 5/29/90. Diane Seifert, City Intern, will be assisting with the development of the map and other aspects of the project. TRAM250STATUS: 5/23/90 page 4 I FOOD AND CONCESSION It was the general consensus of the group to work with the Chamber of Commerce in developing a plan for providing food and concessions to the riders. Two basic ideas were discussed. One would include providing a community meal which would be organized by a community group. Under this scenerio, no other community organizations would be involved in providing the food to the riders. The other alternative would be to organize a number of organizations to participate individually following the "Taste of Monticello" concept. This option may be more difficult to coordinate; however, it could provide a more memorable experience for the riders. The Chamber of Commerce is now actively organizing the food service portion of the event and has settled on the taste of "Monticello Concept." At this time, at least Silver Fox, Monti Club, Burger King, Comfort Inn, Monticello Country Club, Maus Foods, Pizza Factory, and Dominoes have will be providing food services. It is understood that the Chamber may also invite non-profit organizations to participate in the food service program. It is not known at this time when the taste of Minnesota event will begin. Breakfast will be served to the riders at the High School and will be organized by the Chamber of Commerce. The concession stand in the High School arena area will be open from the time the first riders enter town --approximately 11:00 AM until late in the evening. It is my understanding that the Chamber of Commerce has delegated malt beverage distribution to the Lion's Club. This item needs to be confirmed. SECURITY Responsibility: Jeff O'Neill O'Neill noted that he would work with the Wright County Sheriff's Department to assure the safe arrival and departure of cyclists. BIKE SHOP, BAGGAGE TRUCKS, SAG WAGONS It was the general consensus that there is space available on the High School grounds to accommodate these activities. TRAM250STATUS: 5/23/90 Pago 5 (—' COMMUNITY SHUTTLES AND COMMUNICATIONS Responsibility: Jeff O'Neill O'Neill noted that he would contact Hoglund Transportation regarding this issue and that the Monticello Heartland Express could be utilized to shuttle service for riders. It was the general conclusion that a small fee could be charged for ridership on the community shuttle. Details of shuttle routes, er.c., will be defined later. It was also determined that O'Neill would work with Hoglund Transportation in establishing a communications network that would utilize the bus radios and telephone located on one of the buses. TRAM250STATUS: 5/27/90 Pago 6 TRAM 250 MAILING LIST Greg Davies KMOM Radio Box 900 Monticello, MN 55362 295-1070 Candy Benoit 116 Kevin Longley Drive Monticello, MN 55362 295-2778 (H) Caren & Glenn Nemec Route 2, Box 273 Big Lake, MN 55309 Bruce Gagnelius 20561 County Road 50 Big Lake, MN 55309 263-2653 Chris Buckley 521 E. 4th St. Monticello, MN 55362 295-2181 Bryan Swenson 12 Eagle Circle Monticello, MN 55362 295-3482 (H) 475-6051 (W) Duane Gates Community Education Director School District 4882 PO Box 897 Monticello, MN 55362 295-2915 (W) Mary Micke Monticello Times PO Box 548 Monticello, MN 55362 295-3131 (W) Mary Huss/Shelly Miller National Multiple Sclerosis Society MN North Star Chapter 2344 Nicollet Avenue, #280 Minneapolis, MN 55404-3381 970-1500 Me. Christy DeMarais (Women of Today) PO Box 12 Monticello, MN 55362 0 C 14. Information --City Enqineer review of PCA Draft Permit for Wastewater Treatment Plant--Kiellberg West. (J.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: This is an information item only. No action is requested. Following is a letter sent to the PCA from the City Engineer outlining concerns associated with the development of a wastewater treatment facility serving the Kjellberg's West mobile home park. This letter should result in the PCA conducting an information meeting or formal hearing regarding this matter. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Letter from City Engineer regarding proposed Kjellberg West Mobile Home Park wastewater treatment facility. 13 PAY 16 .90 13*38 OSM WLS.m Q.2 Schem mayrron& AS.SOdUMMC. 202t EaS+ttcnnePin n,rnuc A71nnvar � 1S. &M 5541.1 012.13t "60 fn[.1AI•}SOu UtyinCcts May 16, 1990 Planlx•rs Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155 Attn: Mr. Douglas A. Hall, Supervisor Permits Unit, Regulatory Compliance Section Water Quality Division Re: STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM DRAFT PERMIT # MN 0058599 Kjellberg West Mobile Home Park Wastewater Treatment Facility Monticello, Minnesota Gentlemen: j Pursuant to public notice in accordance with Minnesota Rules Chapter 7001.0110, the City of Monticello, through me as their designated City Engineer, wishes to conunent and express potential areas of concern regarding the referenced project and issuance of a State Disposal System Permit for the proposed facility. The City of Monticello's interest in this project stems from the fact that the Kjellberg West Mobile Home Park is just west and adjacent to the Monticello city limits. See the enclosed map received from the PCA where 1 have superimposed on it the city limits. Because of this close proximity to the City, we are concerned that this proposed waste water treatment facility is environmentally sound and properly designed, so as not to effect the surface and groundwaters of the arca. The following are some of the comments and concerns expressed by the City of Monticello. I. The draft permit states that the proposed facility will consist of a 4.0 acre single cell stabilization bond with an operating capacity of approximately 6.95 million gallons and three existing seepage basins with a total area of approximately 1 acre and a total capacity of approximately 1.5 million gallon. This facility will serve a 200 unit mobile home park. This waste water treatment facility, as proposed, is contrary to and not in accordance with PCA Rules and Regulations and the so called 10 State Standards for Sewage Works of the Great takes -Upper Mississippi River Board of State Sanitary Engineers. These standards state that as a minimum the stabilization t pond system should consist of three cells designed to facilitate both series and parallel operations so as to prevent any short circuiting of sewage Influent. The HOD design loading is on the high side for a single pond. PLAY 16 '90 13:3 OSII IIP'LS.191 F.3 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency May 16, 1990 Page 2 2. Criteria for proximity of the treatment facility to habitation does not seem to meet minimum requirements. 3. The use of seepage ponds is highly questionable as to whether they are allowed under PCA or 10 State Standard Guidelines. As indicated on the map, the seepage ponds are in close proximity of wetland areas and in the gradient of groundwater flowing northeasterly to the Mississippi River. The municipal water supply for the City of Monticello is located in this gradient and glacial drift utilizing screened wells, however, at depths of 200 to 300 feet. 4. Other areas of concern, regarding seepage ponds, pertains to the soil uptake rate of the seepage ponds and the quality of effluent from the stabilization pond that will be introduced to the seepage pond. Part II of the draft penult refers to permit effluent limitations, but none are shown in the permit. Will the EPA Groundwater Preventative Action Limits (PAL) requirements under the Safe Drinking Water Standards be exceeded? Has the load -rest cycle for seepage cell regeneration been looked into or calculated. 5. The draft permit indicates that a groundwater monitoring plan will be presented to the PCA prior to August 1, 1990. As a minimum, the plan shall provide for the proper installation and monitoring of three monitoring wells (one up -gradient and two down -gradient) in the vicinity of the seepage ponds. This is certainly a necessary monitoring plan, but groundwater and soils data should have been secured some time ago to ascertain the before groundwater level, quality and also the soil structure in the area. A Piezometric Map of the area should be generated to ascertain the groundwater gradient and also the direction of groundwater flow. 6. Under the EPA Construction Grant Program, the City of Monticello in 1977 completed a Facilities Planning Report for the City as well as for the orderly annexation Area (OAA) which includes the Kjellberg Mobile home Parks. Subsequently the Wastewater Treatment Plant in Monticello was upgraded, utilizing EPA and State Funding, an activated sludge plant provid'utg secondary treatment for 0.91 million. gallons per day. As population increases in the City as well as in the OAA area, the treatment facility can be expanded to 2.4 million gallons per day at the present site to meet population projections to the year 2030. Under consideration presently, is a trunk sewer extension to other Kjellberg property and the East Mobile Home Park, which is adjacent and across the highway from the West Mobile Home Park, the subject of this permitting process Attached is Drawing No. 2 showing this proposed trunk sewer extension to the south and the subject area 0 nqY 16 '90 13:39 OSM r,PLS•h11 P,G CMinnesota Pollution Control Agency May 16, 1490 Page 3 In conclusion, the City of Aionticello is concerned as to the environmental impact this proposed treatment facility will have on surface and groundwaters, in that these facilities will be located up -gradient from the City and their public and private water supplies. With the availability of municipal sewer service not far from the area and planned for adjacent property, this should be further considered before a 5 year permit is granted for this proposed wastewater treatment facility. Respectfully Submitted, ORR-SCHELEN•MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR THE CITY OF MONTICEL.LO C, John P. Badalich, P.E. City Engineer JPB/cmw 05/90-mpca cc: Mayor, Ken Maus, City of Monticello John Slmola, Public Works Director 0 MAY 16 '3F1 13;40 OSti rtPtS.rci ^ • ^j• ••i y " iv- /•` :I � � •Grave! Pity f ! •'��•..f. .�:f( • �. �I n W aside Gen+ Gravg� St Henrys Cem;'�' i � a• Z5 1 i :i Gravel Pit ,I a ,,, •ti.r � , ';�.•+^•„••� o . 1 S ` � t rir4 V� �t •1���� � r '. �� �^� � , �• _ � j 963 a1 . { •�,.v t �. _ = / 14lEv w ,. ,` sc.'a..w. A.w,Jl IfjaDl.•g wes4 "leisXani���y{sYr' .; y." . ../ i G►l'°rj a mmae N•hry M� ". M 0 N Ti I C E L L �; 0 0 N11� t_ Y .......R 22 dy f I MAY 16 '90 1340 OSM WLS,Ml City of Monticello Wright County Minnesota Sanitary Sewer Plan ® M/� a�•aot�r•r��nor : r :••�• VNN 'S'.''�'CZ P. 6 16 '90 13:41 0:1t HPI-S.M P.7 �_.. ..,°-`r----2�»'tW. "7 ! 1..rdl�`,G ."x..14 • r nO c Q ! tl s_N_ t.., iii 26 ; - - - - • - 26 �• ;1 w 1 un 0 \\\ \ �:•: • \ •. _ ir.rrr�..ri rr Exist q ForO*1a111 w� ,�► ♦c,s� ,,�� 4� i �� -�� �� - ♦ Existilntyrastrrliint,p antJ' All 36; i �tr J1•Fi e ,�+' .•, � .�'�:,,;' • "� J �• +�+� �\ T .. it 1 .+ •�' •i• w,�., Ywu + •�r-..: •�'{.. !rte ��=SU •axss�risrs to 4 —.: ''. ,�I•,1�\. i +..mow: r i t+ } ( 1 '� I c i ` c C Council Agenda - 5/29/90 15. Consideration of adoptinq a resolution requestinq assistance for the placement of flood elevation reference marks and signing of 100 -Year flood mark at various locations within the city of Monticello. (G.A.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: I received a call from the St. Paul office of the Department of Natural Resources indicating that there were some funds available through the federal government and through the U.S. Corps of Engineers. Money would be available to purchase and erect elevation reference marks and signing of 100 -year mark locations at difference places within the city of Monticello near the Mississippi River within the flood plain zone. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Approve the resolution requesting assistance for the placement of flood elevation reference marks and signing of 100 -year flood mark at various locations within the city of Monticello. 2. Do not adopt the resolution requesting assistance. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends approval of the resolution requesting assistance in the purchase and erection of elevation reference marks and 100 -year flood locations. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Resolution for adoption. 14 Im RESOLUTION 90 - WHEREAS, the City of Monticello has In effect a Flood Plain Management Ordinance to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of property located in flood hazard areas within Monticello; and WHEREAS, the Flood Plain Management Ordinance references the Flood Insurance Study for the City prepared by the Federal Insurance Administration dated May 1979 and the Flood Boundary and Floodway Map and Flood Insurance Rate Map dated November 1979; and WHEREAS, the Flood Boundary and Floodway Maps refer to elevations on the regional (100 -year) flood profile. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, that funding assistance is hereby requested through the U.S. Corps of Engineers to purchase and erect elevation reference marks and signing of 100 -year mark locations at various locations within the city of Monticello within the flood plain zone. Adopted by the City Council this 29th day of May, 1990. Rick Wolfateller City Administrator C Ken Maus, Mayor Council Agenda - 5/29/90 16. Consideration of inspection criteria and grid system for city of Monticello sidewalks. (J.S.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: At the last meeting, City staff presented a partial inspection report for a section of sidewalk on Maple Street between 4th Street and Broadway. With that report, the staff presented a possible criteria and definitions to be used when inspecting the city of Monticello sidewalk system. Rather than hold a public hearing alone for the sidewalk system on Maple Street, the Council ordered staff to place warning signs along the sidewalk and notify the property owners of the unsafe condition of the sidewalk. This has been completed. The purpose of this meeting is to refine and select the actual criteria and to look at a possible grid system to supplement our existing sidewalk system. The criteria remain unchanged from the last meeting but are enclosed again for your review. We have enclosed with the agenda supplement a map indicating all the existing sidewalks in the city shown in yellow, the areas of the city rural in nature which include paved shoulders to serve as walkways (in blue) and a possible grid system for the innerconnection or continuation of sidewalks in the central portions of the city shown in red. It should be understood that sidewalk installation generally requires the installation of curb and gutter and, of course, the construction of the street prior to that. It should, therefore, be noted that it may be conceivable to have a sidewalk improvement project in the near future innerconnecting those sections which already have curb and gutter, but the more rural sections like Lauring Lane, Oakwood Drive, County Road 117, and Chelsea Road should wait until curb and gutter installation. It would bo difficult in most aroas to build a sidewalk off the blacktop and still maintain the rural typo of drainage with a ditch system. The opportunity exists with the 7th Street and Minnesota Street project to complete much of the sidewalk system along Minnesota Street, 7th Street, and walnut Street with this project should the Council so desire. We have received an extremely competitive price from R.L. Larson Excavation from St. Cloud, Minnesota, for a 4 -inch concrete sidewalk at $1.70 per square foot. This amounts to $8.50 per lineal foot of 5 -foot wide sidewalk, or $850 per 100 foot. Based upon those prices, sidewalk could be extended along 7th Street from Minnesota Street to Highway 25, along Minnesota Street from 7th Street to 6th Street, and along Walnut Street from the library to the mall at an estimated construction cost slightly over $70,000. 15 I Council Agenda - 5/29/90 The Council could look at completing the sidewalk system in phases and could have a requirement that new developments have sidewalks along their collector routes (Evergreens, Sandberg East, etc.). One of the issues that will come up is the existence of hazardous sidewalk in areas where no proposed sidewalk grid exists. In these cases, the homeowner or property owner should be given the option to repair, replace, or remove. In addition, in those areas where sidewalk is completely outdated and in need of major repair or replacement and is on the grid system, there is some logic that the City should participate in the cost of replacement, possibly at 50/50 or even the old well -used 80/20 in the case of residential areas. It is also possible the City could go beyond this and put in sidewalk for free where needed and require maintenance by the property owner. Or the City could go even one step further and have the City maintain sidewalks in heavily traveled areas. There are many options to consider. After the approval of the inspection criteria and grid system, City staff will inspect all of the existing sidewalks in the city of Monticello (this work is already underway) and will prepare a detailed report for review of the Council in June. It is anticipated at that time that the Council will order repair or replacement of such sidewalks needing so and hold a public hearing in July. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative would be to accept the inspection criteria and to establish a grid system for continuation of our existing system. In addition, the City Council should establish a policy regarding repair, removal, or replacement of sidewalks off the grid system, and a possible participation for residential and non- residential sidewalks on the grid system. 2. The second alternative would include, along with alternative N1, the consideration of putting in a portion of the sidewalk with the 7th Street and Minnesota Street Improvement project based upon the above criteria. 3. Alternative 03 would include approval of the inspection criteria and grid system with the actual policies to be sot after review of the inspection report in Juno. 16 C C Council Agenda - 5/29/90 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff would wish to have as much direction as possible regarding the existing sidewalk program in Monticello and requests that the City Council consider alternative #I. It should be noted that the grid system does not include sidewalk systems in existing low -traffic, outlying subdivisions. It is possible that in the future, with the curb and gutter improvements to the Hillcrest area, Council could consider including River Street west of Chestnut Street in the grid system. Also other existing subdivisions could be considered as well. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the criteria from the partial inspection report; Copies of the maps showing existing sidewalk system, paved shoulder areas, and proposed grid system. 17 CITY OF MONTICELLO PARTIAL SIDEWALK REPORT (West side of Maple Street from Broadway to 4th Street) DEFINITION A pedestrian walkway (either bituminous or concrete) is a smooth, continuous horizontal plane generally 4 feet to 5 feet wide, parallel to curb or street driving surface in both boulevard width and vertical height with a cross -slope of 2% to 4% to promote water drainage. It should be free of hazards to pedestrians, bicyclists, and snow removal equipment such as, but not limited to, cracks, settlements, protrusions, both horizontal and vertical such as heaved panels (whole or partial), tree limbs, and overhangs. There should be pedestrian ramps where sidewalk meets curb on all new and major restoration construction. II. CRITERIA AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INSPECTION A. Continuous --free of cracks other than control and expansion joints. Cracks classified in two groups: 1. Sealable --up to three cracks in a panel which run parallel or perpendicular to the walking surface less than 3/4" In width which do not intersect and do not have panel heaving so as to cause an uneven walking surface. These cracks may be sawcut and/or cleaned as necessary, then sealed or caulked with an acceptable latex or silicon concrete sealer In such a way to make them look like an expansion joint. 2. Unsealablo--causo for replacement a. Wandering cracks which deviate more than 3" from a straight line on a 4' panel and 1" on smaller panels generated from the points of origin at edges of panel is cause for whole or partial panel replacement depending on the location of crack/cracks in the panel. b. Cracks caused by panel heave which generate a "lip" or stop in the horizontal plane of 1/4" or more will need repair by whole or partial panel replacement. SIDEWALK REPORT: 5/11/90 Pago 1 O C. c. A crack which causes a "crown" in the panel will be treated in respect to the direction of the crack. i) A perpendicular crown of over 1" from the ends of the panel is cause for replacement. ii) A parallel crown of over 1/2" from edges of panel or in such a way that it retards water drainage is grounds for panel replacement. Iii) Cracks and heaving caused by tree roots may cause additional work to prevent future damage to replaced panels. d. Settlements i) If the settlement is sufficient to trap water causing puddling or icing of walk or to retard proper cross -slope (toward or away from curb based on natural drainage) it must be replaced. B. Overhangs and hazards 1. A hazard is considered, but not limited to, anything which can cause personal injury from tripping or stumbling such as a "step" in the horizontal plane or head injuries from overhangs or protrusion into the vertical planes of the edges of walk. Rocks and panel chips are examples of hazards. Trees and stumps at the very edge of walks may be considered as potential hazards. SIDEWALK REPORT: 5/11/90 Pago 2 Information Item: OAA REZONING REQUEST - Howard Gilham has requested that the OAA rezone his property from Agricultural use to Commercial use. The location of his property is shown on the attached map. Also proposed with the rezoning is the development of a roadway which would connect Highway 39 south of the freeway with Highway 25. A Planner's report has been prepared regarding this matter which is attached for your review. i� tIINM II 11 Kt. l-1 NNxI I's 1 IN15WAI'I AlIC11111t. IS llpl I ll- l 1� 1 N111 1,1 ,1' 1 1 1 111Ih!.1 111'1II It, ^.1!: till 1.1' 16• ,11111 MEIt1ORANIJUM DATE: 4 May 1990 TO: Jelfo'.Nc:ll FROM: John Uban RB: Proposed Extension for Interstate 94 Ftontage Road '111is is a prelimimoy review of the proposed extension of the frontage road on the snuthsideof hltelrtate94west toCou,. y Road 39. 1. lh,i IFl-it ta „c malI ettension is desigtuded in IIIc Comprehensive flan incluJing a tv„ Ipleut frox:,gn 1c•ad system between t'ornty Road 118 and County Road 31) till Ixtth sides at the Inlerstate Highway. 2. With the completion of 701 Street in the near future and the proposed frontage roaJ extension on the south side, a looped frontage road system between 11 iLhttay 25 and County Road 39 would be completed. '11tis will promote additional commercial traffic in the area and provide new opportunities for development along 1-9.3, ?, \fuah of till- traffic using County Road 39, which serves the western rural areae of Wright County, has to cross 1.94 and connect up to Highway 25 through the Downtown prntion of Monticello. With the proposed frontage, road linkage en the meth aids, .,,ref, of til .t truffle eoutd 6culatu t'-1, I liginvay 25 an the Muth cepa Ail the Inter tate. This will help promote business activities in the area and enhances vchirular circulation in this part of town. The looping of the frontage road system i i an intpol Cant element in providing appropriate infrastructure to sine expandtd nruwth in the Monticello area. 4. 'Ihe Complellensive Plan calls for commercial development along the Intel,t:lle in this rote,,, -Installing} the frontage road at this time would encourage commercial if, t clopnv'n!, onitment withi lie Comprehensive Plan. Types of commercial would %airydrl•ending till lie standard%used I'm development. Ant icipateddevelopnu'nl would ptis6bly Its industrial or service oriented rather than convenience retail Jeff O'Neill, 4 May 1990 Page 2 because access to the Interstate is about three-quarters of a mile away. Good visibility would not be enough to attract the convenience -oriented motorist back along the frontage road for three-quarters of a mile. There may he some limited amount of industrial uses with outside storage• building supply, or similar uses. Based on these kinds of uses, it would be appropriate to apply some performance standards to control the types of development in the arca and to maintain a pleasant aesthetic appearance along the Interstate. llte Comprehensive Man polity is that the highway oriented uses along 1-94 should be concentrated and not spread out. Sparse development patterns can waste the prime commerrEl landwherein market •0-..nmt;vn is critical •n evnandine development. 5 Should the area served by the proposed frontage road be left in the township• the lots will have to be large enough to have an on-site sewer system. I would recommend at least 50 percent of a lot be open space for the drain I field to serve the individual sanitary sewer. Perhaps a ten -acre lot minimum would be appropriate for this arca if left un -annexed into the City. (i. sanitary sewer is pioposed to he extended into Ihis Inca some time in Ihr future Th._ development character %vo•.ild then rhangc lo;analler lots and nivic intea•.r us_a "i•asetl un City rurn'ices. H•ith r'ity srn•i:cs, nl course, coma the, ac^d fur annexation. Should an inicrittt solution be Sought, performance slandatds 0iould In• ayree,l to for the properly served h) the frontage road. The following is a list ul' bpeciGc areas That could he included if such un approach were (aken - a) landsc.•tpe standards as developed in the City Ordinance; b) Sign controls dissallowing any billboards or product advert icing signs; e) Site standards such as par king requirement setbacks, lighting, pavemen,, drainage, etc.; d) Architectural controls to eliminate metal buildings of a low-qu:diq nature, pole barns, etc. so that the area is not a development 'free-for-all": and e) Provisions for ulililies and platting for future City services. 'Ibis agreement could Ip; rc:Irhed betvern the lily and the OAA Board in some fashion to hind the land owners/developers to these development standards. 7. The OAA, in order to implement these, standards, shnuld amend their MA plan; to include a specific lord use designation on the affected properties, which will then refer to the performance standards. This plan should also work out utility phasing, drainage, septic systems, etc. and a future date of anncxalion haled either on time or extension of utilities, 8. Should this rand remain in the township with less stringent amtrols th.tn the l'iry of Monticello and with Irsa assesamentx on the property for future uolitit-, then the arta might have a competitive advantage over other land altcady in the City served trysewer and water. 'Ike standrrds and future asxemments and other costs need In be prearranged and determined ser that this area dour not have an overtly ( Jeff O'Neill, 4 May 1990 Page 3 unfair competitive position. Should this land be available at a noticeably lower price and considering it would have visibility to the Interstate, there could be an impact of softening the market for the Monticello Industrial Park in favor of less expensive land. The banking of future assessment fees and other methods might be derived to more fairly equalize the economic positions of the newly served properties with other properties in the area. Should the area be annexed into the City of Monticello prior to development, then there would not be an issue of land value or competition based on an unfair advantage because all utilities and ordinance requirements would have to be met. To the degree that this can be equalized is a critical element to allow the area to remain in the OAA with future annexation into the City of Monticello. X 7-10 1 Jrs And'1 • ` a4 Existing g ��. rnrururu Proposed RoadZ -----Sewer 18 17-1 Re: -Zone Proposed �` ° '••r�!�r1rr; _ ' t •••+, `•�'` �' .yam. `..,moi y � � Infill 16 C(NELSEAF i•4 +•••••+• �'w-_2... GSA" 15 DUNDA Q -'Naas :• .: •+,• + ... •. ! — +\ ,-a a a.a ...... ...... Annexation Sty: , �.;: •�,, .+ 8 lVa..T.t ` . a;= `�• •-auurruarrnr uanrnursr�a) • �--�«" _ ^ � . ' City of Montice, c 14. . •12 ; ;.fi" t w,ight County it �,'- — a..,,i:�{ ;r . •', Lo er Rang owth ;.,.;? •., ..L:,. PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION,13.E .....a SYSTEM 3 GROWTH AREAS ...... S` ,,� 1' cm 106 ! t v +• { T , M+� oar Icrr.ar r••.aGr � •�,,.f •' � "�' ;7i-• art artOCafrr !.0 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 05/25/90 09:53:31 Ci H, CATs VENDOR VENDOR NAME DETAIL DESCR 29658 04/27/90 185 SA:.ZWEOEL/PATTY Oisbursem?nt HistOry 4?port CHECK RESISTER - GENERAL AMOUNT CLAIM INVOICi. PROTECT 179.42 29659 04/27/90 174 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE IN 933.62 29659 04/27/90 174 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE IN 891.15 29659 04/27/90 174 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE IN 278.58CR 29659 04/27/90 174 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE IN 616.07 29659 04/27/90 174 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE IN 158.03 29659 04/27/90 174 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE IN 158.03 29659 04/27/90 174 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE IN 90.26CR 29659 04/27/90 174 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE IN 689.82 29659 04/27/90 174 PPINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE IN 158.03 C49659 PRINCIPAL 04/27/90 174 MUTUAL LIFE IN 35.11 29659 04/27/90 174 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE IN 381.95 29659 04/27/90 174 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE IN 1.078.37 29659 04/27/90 174 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE IN 10.52 29659 04/27/90 174 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE IN 194.01 29659 04/27/90 174 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE IN 336.14 29659 04/27/90 174 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE IN 89.03 29659 04/27/90 174 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE IN 80.03 29659 04/27/90 174 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE IN 7.01 29659 04/27/90 174 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE IN 560.46 29659 04/27/90 174 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE IN 305.56 29659 04/27/90 174 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE IN 58.67 J 6.383.77 •CHECK. TOT,U. 29660 04/?7/90 37 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE 260.75 v 1 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 05/25/90 09:58:31 CHECK# DATE VENDOR VENDOR NAME DETAIL DESCR 29661 04/27/90 160 OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC. I 29661 04/27/90 160 OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC. I 29662 04/27/90 133 ROAD RESCUE. INC. 29663 04/27/90 197 STAR & TRIBUNE 29664 04/27/90 51 EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTWAR 29665 04/27/90 97 KOROPCHAK/OLIVE 29665 04/27/90 97 KOROPCHAK/OLIVE 29666 04/27/90 131 MOBIL 29666 04/27/90 131 MOBIL 29666 04/27/90 131 MOBIL 29666 04/27/90 131 MOBIL 29667 04/27/90 158 O.E.I. BUSINESS FORMS 29668 04/27/90 56 FEEORITE CONTROLS. INC. 29669 04/27/90 11 ANDERSON/GARY 29669 04/27/90 11 ANDERSON/GARY 29670 04/27/80 133 MONTICELLO CHAMBER OF CO 29671 04/27/90 247 COMPUFORMS. INC. Disbursement History Report, CHECK REGISTER - GENERA' AMOUNT CLAIM INVOIC: PROJECT 462.89 174.91 637.80 89.60 532.00 20.00 11.25 10.00 21.25 100.93 5.00 23.51 23.52 152.96 139.53 1.271.95 120.00 117.85 237.85 20.00 273.36 'CHECK TOTAL •CHECK TOTA i *CHECK TOTAL •CHECK TOTAL J BPC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 05/25/90 09:58:31 Oi•s5ursiment History R?oor? 1, REGISTER - GENERAL cCHEF-K. CK= DATE VENDOR VENDOR NAME AMOLIN1 CLAIM INV0;_[ DETAIL OE;CR PROJECT 29671 04/27/90 247 COMPUFORMS. INC. 273.36 546.72 ■CHECK TOTAL 29672 04/27/90 113 MID CENTRAL. INC. 847.83 29673 04/27/90 250 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY 107.50 29674 04/27/90 .90029 SIMPSON/MARC 236.00 29675 04/27/90 249 IBM CORPORATION 16.087.24 29676 04/27/90 248 CITY OF SAINT PAUL/THE 572.05 29677 04/27/90 .90030 WOODWARD/JOANNE 50.79 �J 29678 04/27/90 0 AMERI DATA 284.00 29679 04/27/90 118 MN DEPART OF NATURAL RES 711.00 29680 04/27/90 198 STATE CAPITOL CREDIT UNI 30.04 29681 04/27/90 257 KNUTSON INC/RICHARD 10.103.96 29681 04/27/90 257 KNUTSON INC/RICHARO 15.890.03 25.993.99 *CHECK TOTAL 29682 04/27/90 222 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 2.274.23 29682 04/27/90 222 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 1.683.03 29682 04/27/90 222 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 12.24 29682 04/27/90 222 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 9.34 9082 04/27/90 222 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANN 311.16 C� D P.f:C FINANCIAL SYSTEM 05/25/90 09:58:31 CHECK# DATE VENDOR VENDOR. NAME DETAIL DESCR Disbursement History R.!Dor- CHECK REGISTER - GENER. AMOU:JT CLAM INVOICt PPOJECT 29682 04/27/90 222 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 83.84 29682 04/27/90 222 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 151.25 29682 04/27/90 222 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 42.25 29682 04/27/90 222 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 0.25 29682 04/27/90 222 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 50.27 29682 04/27/90 222 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 3.65 29682 04/27/90 222 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 132.48 29682 04/27/90 2?2 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 42.25 29682 04/27/90 222 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 9.38 29682 04/27/90 222 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 119.71 29682 04/27/90 222 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 181.40 29682 04/27/90 222 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 57.39 29682 04/27/90 222 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 225.09 29682 04/27/90 222 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 42.23 29682 04/27/90 222 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 42.23 29682 04/27/90 222 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 9.06 29682 04/27/90 222 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 131.33 29682 04/27/90 222 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 34.28 29682 04/27/00 222 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 18.33 5.666.57 29683 04/27/90 176 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE 817.70 29683 04/27/90 176 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE 90.43 29083 04/27/90 176 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE 49.10 29883 04/27/90 176 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE 88.57 i—) *CHECK TOTAL .i J 91 RRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 05/25/90 09:58:31 Oisoursemant History Reoort CHECK REGISTER - GENERAL `f _' �FtECK;t DATE VENDOR VENDOR NAME AMOUNT CLAIM INVOICE DETAIL DESCR PROJECT 2968: 04/27/90 176 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES PETIPE 24.74 29683 04/27/90 176 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE 29.44 29683 04/27/90 176 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE 77.58 29683 04/27/90 176 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE 24.74 29683 04/27/90 176 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE 5.50 29683 04/27/90 176 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE 70.10 29683 04/27/90 176 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE 106.24 29683 04/27/90 176 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE 33.61 29683 04/27/90 176 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE 131.81 29683 04/27/90 178 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE 24.73 3683 04/27/90 176 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE 24.73 29683 04/27/90 176 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE 5.30 29683 04/27/90 176 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE 39.69 29683 04/27/90 176 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIE 20.08 29683 04/27/90 176 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE 10.73 1.633.90 *CHECK TOTAL 29684 04/27/90 36 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE 1.787.95 29685 04/21/90 88 I.C.M.A. RETIREMENT TRUS 500.93 29685 04/27/90 88 I.C.M.A. RETIREMENT TRUS 182.04 682.97 "CHECK TOTAL 29686 04/27/90 800000 VOID CHECKS VOID CHECKS 9687 04/27/90 118 MN DEPART OF NATURAL RES 3-76.00 29688 04/27/90 224 Y.M.C.A. OF MINNEAPOLIS 625.00 RRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 05/25/90 09:58:31 CHECKS DATE VENDOR VENDOR NAME & ASSOCIATES/EA 29694 04/27/90 DETAIL DESCR 29689 04/27/90 197 STAR & TRIBUNE 29690 04/27/90 54 ENNIS CABINETS/JIM 29691 04/27/90 38 COMMUNICATION AUDITORS 29691 04/27/90 38 COMMUNICATION AUDITORS 29692 04/27/90 .90031 HAZARD CONTROL. INC. 29693 04/27/90 260 AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR CO 29694 04/27/90 10 ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES/EA 29694 04/27/90 10 ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES/EA 29694 04/27/90 10 ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES/EA 29694 04/27/90 10 ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES/EA 29695 04/27/90 114 MIDWAY INDUTRIAL SUPPLY 29696 04/27/90 173 PREUSSE'S CLEANING SERVI 29698 04/27/90 173 PREUSSE'S CLEANING SERVI 29697 04/27/90 199 STENCEL/PEGGY 29698 04/27/90 81 HERMES/JERRY 29690 04/27/90 165 PETERSEN'S MONT FORD -MER 29699 04/27/90 165 PETERSEN'S MONT FORD -MER Disbursement History Report CHECK REGISTER - GENERA , AMOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PROJECT 570.00 1.545.00 29.84 292.33 322.17 1.350.00 5.242.00 118.53 1.338.00 29.20 1.649.49 3.135.22 47.07 400.00 50.00 450.00 815.00 227.50 103.35 47.70 151.05 *CHECK TOTAL r J •CHECK TOTAL *CHECK TOTAL J •CHECK TOTAL BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 055/25/90 09:58:31 CECKil DATE VCNOOR VENDOR NAME DETAIL DESCR 29700 04/27/90 95 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFICE 29701 04/27/90 162 ORR-SChcLEN-MAYEP0N &. AS 29701 04/27/90 162 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & AS 29701 04/27/90 162 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & AS 29701 04/27/90 162 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & AS 29702 04/27/90 258 MOORES EXCAVATING 29703 04/27/90 259 BRAUN ENGINEERING 29704 04/27/90 4 ADOPT -A -PET 29705 04/27/00 185 SALZWEDEL/PATTY 29706 04/30/90 97 KOROPCHAK/OLIVE RECORDING FEES/MARTIE'S 29707 04/30/90 31 CHAPIN PUBLISHING COMPAN 29708 04/30/90 26 BUSINESS OEVELOPMF.NT SER 1 29708 04/30/90 2B BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT SER 29708 04/30/90 26 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT SER 29709 04/30/00 .90032 RISING/MICHAEL 29710 04/30/90 .90033 DAHLGREN/IVY 9711 04/30/00 .90034 MERT2/TOM DisDurseme nt History Reoort CHECK REGISTER- GENERAL AMOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PROJECT 8j.1.3 7.093.65 7.745.58 3.423.26 1.475.77 19.738. 2'u 600.00 1.424.00 310.00 469.00 38.30 134.90 4.700.00 4.70V.00 4.700.00 14.100.00 75.00 50.00 50.00 *CHECK TOTAL $CHECK TOTAL 3 7 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 05/25/90 09:58:31 CHECK# DATE VENDOR VENDOR NAME DETAIL DESCR 29712 04/30/90 .90035 OGRAM/ROBERT & AMY 29713 04/30/90 98 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITI 29714 04/30/90 86 HOLMES & GRAVEN 29714 04/30/90 66 HOLMES & GRAVEN GENERAL CHECKING Disbursement History Reoort, CHECK REGISTER - GENERt AMOUNT CLAIM INVOIC` PROJECT 25.00 155.00 216.00 4.479.00 4.695.00 •CHECK TOTAL 8122.049.33 i J BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLG 05/25/90 08:53 Check Reai5ter- GENERAL GL540R-VO4.06 PAGE 1 C. NK VENDOR CHECKS DATE AMOUNT GENL GENERAL CHECKING 000072 GOVERNMENT TRAINING CENT 29715 05/09/90 15.00 000210 U.S. POSTMASTER 29716 05/09/90 500.00 000262 STATE TREASURER 29717 05/09/90 122.25 000254 WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER 29718 05/09/90 30.00 000254 WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER 29719 05/09/90 189.80 000264 LINCOLN COMPANIES/THE 29720 05/09/90 2.500.00 000118 MN DEPART OF NATURAL RES 29721 05/09/90 418.00 000042 CORROW SANITATION 29722 05/09/90 12.116.67 000235 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF 29723 05/09/90 150.00 000127 MINN POLLUTION CONTROL A 29724 05/09/90 170.00 000008 AME READY MIX ?9725 05/13/90 $2.25 000014 ANOKA COUNTY SOCIAL SERV 29726 05/13/90 2:7.54 .90036 BARTHEL/JERRY 29727 05/13/90 47.50 000024 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHONE CO 29728 05/13/90 7.046.80 .90037 CONSTRUCTION 70. INC. 29729 05/13/90 2.335.10 000047 DECISION DATA SERVICE IN 29730 05/13/90 226.?4 000084 HOGLUND TRANSPORTATION 29731 05/13/90 4.274.76 000088 I.C.M.A. RETIREMENT TRUS 29732 05/13/90 682.97 000243 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS 29733 05/13/90 25.00 000115 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY 29734 05/13/90 636.57 000130 MINNESOTA U.C. FUND 29735 05/13/90 391.80 C000155 NORWEST INVESTMENT SEP.VI 29736 a5/13/90 2.407.61 ,} 000170 POLKA DOT RECYCLING 29737 05/13/90 1.187.17 000175 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GR 29736 05/13/90 27.005.83 000176 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE 29739 05/13/90 1.681.05 000269 SHELTON COMPANY 29740 05/13/90 270.00 000198 STATE CAPITOL CREDIT UNI 29741 05/13/90 30.04 000262 STATE TREASURER 29742 05/•13/90 2.60 000217 WOLFSTELLER/RICHARD 29743 05/13/90 300.00 000219 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR/TR 28744 05/13/90 2.047.05 000222 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 29745 05/13/90 5.296.54 GENERAL CHECKING 72.379.14 -,r- - RRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO 05/25/90 08:55 Check Reoist=r - GENERAL GL540R-VO4.06 PILGF BANK VENOOR CHEC✓.X DATE AMOUNT GENL GENERAL CHECKING 000160 OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC. I 29345 05/16/90 0.00 000118 MN DEPART OF NATURAL RES 29746 05/16/90 736.00 000185 SALZWEDEL/PATTY 29747 05/16/90 485.00 000231 DARLEY & CO./W. S. 29748 05/16/90 7.85 .90039 JENSEN/DAN 29749 05/16/90 533.32 000072 GOVERNMENT TRAINING CENT 29750 05/1G/90 65.00 .99040 STROMBERG/DAVID 29751 05/16/90 25.00 000098 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITI 29752 05/16/90 ?5.00 000148 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO 29753 05/16/90 8.259.77 000118 MN DEPART OF NATURAL RES 29754 05/16/90 809.00 000174 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE IN 29755 05/21/90 6.534.48 000072 GOVERNMENT TRAINING CENT 29756 05/21/90 65.00 000135 MONTICELLO FIRE OEPARTME 29757 05/21/90 2.662.70 000118 MN DEPART OF NATURAL RES 29758 05/21/90 394.00 000015 A T & T INFO SYSTEMS 29759 05/23/90 3.96 000003 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL 29760 05/23/90 50.00 000010 ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES/EA 29161 05/23/90 147.73 000270 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO. 29762 05/23/90 4.792.00 000020 BEN FRANKLIN 29763 05/23/90 63.45 000266 RIOCYCLE 29764 05/23/90 42.00 000026 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT SER 29765 05/23/90 1.516.25 000027 BUSINESS RECOPOS CORPORA 29766 05/23/90 401.08 000030 CENTRAL MCGOWAN. INC. 29767 05/23/90 37.85 000275 CENTURY LASS 29768 05/23/00 261.94 000031 CHAPIN PUBLISHING COMPAN 29769 05/23/90 136.80 000035 COAST TO COAST 29770 05/23/90 611.64 000036 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE 29771 05/23/90 1.835.04 000040 CONWAY TRUCK & EQUIPMENT 29772 05/23/80 755.00 000041 COPY DUPLCATING PRODUCTS 29773 05/23/90 267.80 000045 OAHLGREN/SHAROLOW AND UB 29774 05/23/90 3.213.57 .90042 OEHMER/TERRY 29775 05/23/90 135.15 000040 DUERR'S WATER CARE SERVI 29776 05/23/90 27.65 000050 DYNA SYSTEMS 29777 05/23/90 257.02 .80038 FARNAM/TED 29778 05/23/90 249.95 000080 FLICKER'S T.V. & APPLIAN 29779 05/23/00 24.95 000081 FOSTER-FRAN2EN-CARLSON A 29780 03/23/90 50.00 000280 FYLES EXCAVATING & HONEY 29781 05/23/90 3.252.00 000064 GENERAL RENTAL CENTER 29782 05/23/90 87.59 000069 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL. I 29783 05/23/90 70.00 000277 GREEN SIDE UP LAWN & TRE 29784 05/23/90 159.72 000073 GRIEFNOW SHEET METAL 29705 05/23/90 250.00 000078 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 29788 05/23/90 208.88 000081 HERMES/JERRY 29787 05/23/90 227.50 000082 HOGLUND BUS COMPANY 29788 05/23/90 1.57 000085 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFICE ?9789 05/23/90 87.57 000088 I.C.M.A. RETIREMENT TRUS 29790 05/23/90 582.97 000090 INT UNION OF OPERAT ENGI 29791 05/23/90 72.00 j 000095 J M OIL COMPANY 29792 05/23/90 230.31 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELL;- 05/25/90 08:55 Chec+ Resister- GENERAL GL540R-VO4.06 PAGE: CNK VENDOR CHECK#, DATE AMOUNT GENL GENERAL CHECKING 000097 KOROPCHAK/OLIVE 29793 05/23/90 5.00 000265 M & P TRANSPORT, INC. 29794 05/23/90 12.72 000104 MACOUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 29795 05/23/90 287.87 000106 MARCO BUSINESS PPOOUCTS. 29796 05/23/90 293.15 000107 MARTIE'S FARM SERVICE 29797 05/23/90 14.75 000109 MAUS FOODS 2979£ 05/23/90 41.58 000114 MIDWAY INOUTPIAL SUPPLY ?9799 05/23/90 41.68 000279 MIDWEST VISION OISTRIBUT 29800 05/23/90 '=.50 000 127 MINN POLLUTION CONTROL A ?9£01 05/23/90 4?.00 000131 MOBIL 2980? 05/23/90 2?1.78 000136 MO,:TICELLO OFFICE PRODUC ?9803 125/23/90 58'.85 000137 MONTICELLO PRINTING 29804 05/23/90 674.45 000140 MONTICELLO TIMES 29805 05/23/90 2.201.93 000144 NATIONAL BUSHING PARTS & 29806 05/23/90 46.65 000278 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION 29807 05/23/90 75.00 000146 NELSON OIL COMPANY 29£08 05/23/90 25.62 000147 NORTHERN OXYGEN SERVICE. 29809 05/23/90 13.50 000158 O.E.I. BUSINESS FORMS 29810 05/23/90 70.70 000263 O'CONNOR/MICHAEL W. 29911 05/23/90 9?5.00 000160 OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC. I 29812 05/23/90 12.881.38 000162 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & AS 29813 05/23/00 6.456.44 t 000271 P & H WAREHOUSE SALES. I 29814 05/23/90 189.30 000164 PARK EOUPMENT COMPANY 29815 05/23/90 97.95 000272 PLANT & FLANGED EOUIPMEN 29816 05/23/90 13.00 000251 PLUMBERY-PURCELL'S PLBG 29817 0:/23/90 345.55 000173 PREUSSE'S CLEANING SERVI 29818 05/23/90 450.00 000176 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE 29819 05/23/90 1.709.53 000179 RELIABLE CORPORATION/THE 29620 05/23/90 132.66 000181 RENNER & SONS INC./E. H. 29£21 05/23/90 410.00 000267 RESCUE MAGA2INE 29872 05/23/90 23.95 000268 RUFF AUTO PARTS 29823 05/23/90 20.00 000184 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. 29824 05/23/90 61.00 000229 SCHARBER & SONS. INC. 29825 05/23/90 15.75 000186 SCHERER SANITATION 29826 05/23/90 31.00 000188 SENTRY SYSTEMS 29877 05/',3/90 126.00 000281 SHARE CORPORATION 29£?8 05/23/90 291.13 000191 SHUMAN/CATHY 29879 05/23/90 3?.00 000103 SIMONSON LUMBER COMPANY 29£30 05/23/90 75.90 000194 SMITH & HAVES 29831 05/23/90 3.013.51- .013.54000273 000273 SNYDER DRUG 29832 05/23/00 31.98 000197 STAR TRIBUNE 29033 05/23/00 255.00 000198 STATE CAPITOL CREDIT UNI 29834 05/23/90 30.04 000199 STENCEL/PEGGY 29835 05/23/90 475.00 000203 TAYLOR LAND SURVEYORS IN 29836 05/23/90 63.00 000211 UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE 29037 05/23/90 110.13 000213 UNOCAL 29838 05/23/00 109.45 .90041 VISU-SEWER CLEAN & SEAL 29839 05/23/90 255.00 .90043 WALLEN/MARK 29840 05/23/90 339.80 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 05/25/90 08:55 Check Resister - GENERAL BANK VENOOR C.HECKt DATE GENL GENEsAL CHECKING 000219 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR -TR 000275 WRIGHT COUNTY GEPT OF HI 000222 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 000224 Y.M.C.A. OF MINNEAPOLIS 000223 YONAK LANDFILL. INC. 000081 HERMES/•JERRY GENERAL CHECKING GRAND TOTAL ALL CHECKS (29658 to 29846) CITY OF MONT[CELL- GL540R-VO4.06 PAGE 3 AMOUNT J 29841 05/23/90 29842 05/23/90 29843 05/23/90 29844 05/23/90 29845 05/23/90 29846 05/16/90 12.551.21 2.463.50 5.939.70 625.00 4.920.48 227.50 101.729.82 $296.155.29 c� BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 0.5/25/90 09:50:57 i 'CHECK# DATE VENDOR VENDOR NAME DETAIL OESCR 15063 04/30/90 800038 PP.INCIPAI- MUTIIA1, I.TFF IN 15063 04/30/90 800038 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE IN 15064 04/30/90 800015 FOSTER/FRANZEN/CARLSON A AUDIT FEES 15065 04/30/90 800040 QUALITY NINE & SPIRITS C 15066 04/30/90 800040 QUALITY MINE & SPIRITS C 15066 04/30/90 800040 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS C 15067 04/30/90 800016 GRIGGS. COOPER.' & COMPANY x.5008 04/30/90 800022 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE L 15069 04/30/90 800037 PHILLIPS & SONS CO/ED 15069 04/30/90 800037 PHILLIPS & SONS CO/EO 15070 04/30/90 800039 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE 15070 04/30/90 800039 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE 15071 04/30/90 600005 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE 15072 04/30/90 600052 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 15072 04/30/90 600052 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 15072 04/30/90 600052 WRIGHT CO!INTY STATE BANK 5072 04/30/90 000052 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK OisOursemeit History Reoort CHECK REGISTER - LIOUOR AMOUNT CLAIM INVO?:. PROJECT 108.60 718.75 827.35 494.00 *CHECK TOIAL 2.061.32 315.22 465.02 780.24 *CHECK TOTAL 2.460.40 151.50 520.26 294.93 815.19 111.05 117.61 228.56 226.89 245.52 700.e4 3.75 200.04 'CHECK TOTAL *CHECK TOTAL BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 05/25/90 09:50:57 Disbursement History R?oort. CHECK REGISTER - LIOUOR CHECK# DATE VENDOR VENDOR NAME AMOUNT CLAIM INVOICE DETAIL DESCR PROJECT 15072 04/30/90 800052 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE PiA::K 3.75 654.80 •CHECK TOTAL 15073 04/30/90 800044 STATE CAPITOL CREDIT UNI 250.00 15074 04/30/90 800012 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 35.72 15075 04/30/90 800022 JO,•HNSON BROS WHOLESALE L 937.38 15075 04/30/90 800022 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE L 1.243.49 2.180.67 •CHECK TOTAL 15076 04/30/90 800040 DUALITY WINE & SPIRITS C 1.214.46 15076 04/30/90 800040 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS C 269.00 1.483.46 •CHECK TOTj 15077 04/30/90 600022 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE L 338.51 15077 04/30/90 800022 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE L 972.97 1,311.48 •CHECK TOTAL 15078 04/30/90 800018 GRIGGS. COOPER & COMPANY 2.389.85 15079 04/30/90 800012 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 370.94 15079 04/30/90 800012 EAGLE. WINE COMPANY 18.59 389.53 •CHECK TOTAL LIQUOR FUND $17.241.25 •*• BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY Of MrNTICELLt- 0'5/25/90 08:50 Cheek R?gist?r_ LIQUOR GL540R-VO4.06 PDGF i p/ II NK VENO'JR CHECKS OA TE AMOUNT L IQR L IOUOP FUND 800007 TQAVELERS DIRECTORY SERV 15080 05/04/90 161.00 800001 BEQNTCK'S PEPSI COLA COM 15081 05/11/90 303.70 800004 COAST TO COAST 15082 05/11/90 4.68 800006 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE 15083 05/11/90 7.195.11 800008 CTI SERVICES 15084 05/11/90 100.00 800009 DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING 15085 05/11/90 18.257.95 800010 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 15086 05/11/90 406.75 800011 DICK BEVERAGE COMPANY 15087 05/11/90 ?.025.65 800012 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 15088 05/ii/90 62.02 800059 GLASS HUT/THE 15089 05/11/90 36.00 800018 GRIGGS. COOPER & COMPANY 15090 05/11/90 2.761.77 600019 GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE INC. 15091 05/11/90 12.4 3.30 800022 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE L 15092 05/11/90 2.776.34 800021 JUDE CANDY & TOBACCO COM 15093 05/11/90 466.49 800023 KOLLES SANITATION 15094 05/11/90 192.60 800024 KRWC RADIO STATION 15095 05/11/90 96.00 800026 L "N" R SERVICES 15096 05/11/90 25.00 800025 LIEFERT TRUCKING 15097 05/11/90 480.54 800027 MAUS FOODS 15098 05/11/90 10.43 800028 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY 15099 05/11/90 53.89 800031 MONTICELLO OFFICE PfOOUC 15100 05/11/90 2.99 800032 MONTICELLO TIMES 15101 05/11/90 152.40 1 800037 PHILLIPS & SONS CO/EO 15102 05/11/90 969.20 800040 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS C 15103 05/11/90 862.35 800041 RON'S ICE COMPANY 15104 05/11/90 347.42 800043 SEVEN-UP BOTTLING COMPAN 15105 05/11/90 39.50 800045 ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT SUP 15106 05/11/90 128.65 800048 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP 15107 05/11/90 9.430.05 800051 VIKING COCA-COLA BOTTLIN 15108 05/11/90 236.35 800053 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 15109 05/11/90 11.90 t LIOUOR FUND 60.150.08 b ** a BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO 05/25/90 08:52 Check Register - LIQUOR GL54OR-VO4.06 PAGE BANK VENOOR CHECKU DATE AMOUNT LIOR LIQUOR FUND 800002 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHONE CO 15110 05/12/90 97.56 800018 GRIGGS. COOPER & COMPANY 151 1 1 05/12/90 1.715.39 800035 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO 15112 os/1?j90 613.00 800039 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE 15113 05/12/90 235.85 800044 STATE CAPITOL CREDIT UNI 15114 05/12/90 250.00 800052 WPIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 15115 05/12/90 653.91 LIQUOR FUND 3.555.61 E BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO 05/25/90 08:52 Check Register — LIQUOR GL540R-VO4.06 PAGE 1 CJK VENDOR CHECK# DATE AMOUNT LIOR LIQUOR FUND 800020 GRUYS. JOHNSON & ASSOCIA 14931 05/15/90 165.0008 800062 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL/TOB/FI 15116 05/15/90 250.00 800037 PHILLIPS & SONS CO/EO 15117 05/15/90 4.465.62 800018 GRIGG$. COOPER F. COMPANY 15118 05/15/90 2.455.57 800054 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 15119 05/15/90 40.25 800060 KMOM RADIO STATION 15120 05/15/90 110.00 800012 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 15121 05/15/90 26.46 800022 JOHNSON EROS WHOLESALE L 151?2 05/15/90 1.04?.10 800038 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE IN 15123 05/70/90 8?7.35 800064 BUSINESS RECORDS COPPORA 15124 05/23/90 133.90 800005 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE 151?5 05/23/90 ?33.14 800018 GRIGGS. COOPER & COMPANY 15126 05/23/90 97.43 800065 MCOOWALL COMPANY 15127 05/23/90 72.30 800050 MONTICELLO VACUUM CENTER 15128 05/23/90 32.3E 800039 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE 15129 05/23/90 202.54 800040 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS C 15130 05/23/90 2.743.61 800044 STATE CAPITOL CREDIT UNI 15131 05/23/90 250.00 800052 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE BANK 15132 05/23/90 645.23 LIQUOR FUND 13.463.98 *w GRAND TOTALL ALL CHECKS (15063 to 151M $94.410.82