City Council Agenda Packet 06-25-1990AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Monday, June 25, 1990 - 7:00 p.m.
Mayor: Ken Maus
Council Members: Fran Fair, warren Smith, Shirley Anderson, Dan
Blonigen
1. Call to order. �i
2. Approval of minutes of he regular meeting held June 11, 1990.
3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints.
4. Consideration of withdrawing requirement that Kirkman Addition
(K -Mart) ponding area be placed on the plat.
5. Consideration of accepting the 1989 Audit Report for the City
of Monticello.
6. Consideration of accepting feasibility study, adopting
preliminary finance plan, and consideration of calling a
public hearing on utility improvements --Sandberg East.
7. Consideration of acceptance of sidewalk inspection report and
ordering public hearing.
B. Consideration of advertising for bids for annual sealcoating
project.
9. Quarterly department head reports.
10. Consideration of an ordinance amendment expanding the
definition of the public nuisance ordinance pertaining to
grass and woods.
11. Considoration of bills for the month of June.
12. Adjournment.
c
C
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, June 11, 1990 - 7:00 p.m.
Members Present: Hen Maus, Warren Smith, Shirley Anderson, Dan
Blonigen
Members Absent: Fran Fair
2. Approval of minutes.
Motion was made by Dan Blonigen, seconded by Shirley Anderson,
to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held May 29,
1990. Motion carried unanimously.
3. Citizens comments/petitions. requests, and complaints.
None forthcoming.
4. Consideration of appeal of a public nuisance order.
Applicant, Marvin Scherer.
This item was withdrawn from the agenda, as the applicant has
now complied with the public nuisance order.
5. Consideration of resolutions awarding the sale of $560{000
G.O. tax increment bonds, Series 1990A, and $730,000 G.O.
improvement bonds. Series 1990B.
Mr. Jerry Shannon of Springsted summarized the bids submitted
to the City of Monticello for both the Series 1990A and 1990B.
During his presentation, he noted that the net interest cost
and rate for both bonds were less than expected. In addition,
he noted that the tax increment income intended to retire the
general obligation tax increment bond, Series 1990A, will be
sufficient.
Shannon also noted that Moody's was concerned about the
existing unpaid assessments owed the City; however, this
concern was not sufficient to lower the City's "A" bond
rating. Aside from the delinquencies, the City has an
excellent financial statement.
After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson,
seconded by Dan Blonigon, to adopt a resolution awarding the
$560,000 City of Monticello, Minnesota, general obligation tax
increment bond, Series 1990A, to Northwest Investment
Services, Inc., at a net interest rate of 6.560345%. Motion
carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 90-24.
Page 1
9
Council Minutes - 6/11/90
Motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Dan Blonigen,
to approve a resolution awarding the $730,000 City of
Monticello, Minnesota, general obligation improvement bonds,
Series 1990B, to Northwest Investment Services, Inc., at a net
interest rate of 6.6143538. Motion carried unanimously.
SEE RESOLUTION 90-25.
Consideration of animal services agreement renewal --Patty,
Salzwedel.
Rick Wolfsteller informed Council that the pound and animal
control agreement is essentially two years old, and the
contractor requests that the City review her performance and
consider increasing compensation. Wolfsteller reported that
Patty Salzwedel, along with her husband, has been doing an
excellent job in the cleaning and maintenance of the dog pound
and in the animal control services. Wolfsteller noted that
since 1988, City veterinarian bills for euthanization have
decreased substantially and thct Patty has been successful in
either direct adoption of the animals or placing them through
the Humane Society and/or the adopt -a -pet organization.
Wolfsteller went on to note that the cost for operating animal
control service has decreased substantially since 1987 and
1988 due to Patty's efforts. Wolfsteller went on to note that
City staff has had very few complaints regarding animal
control services; and due to Patty's dedication to her duties,
he recommended that the contract be renewed for another 12
months with the animal control contract being increased by $60
per month. This would be an effective increase of
approximately 4.58 annually since the contract is already two
years old.
Dan Blonigen noted that he has no problem with the increase to
the contract. Shirley Anderson agreed. Warren Smith noted
that he had only one dog complaint in the past two years, and
he supports the increase in the contract.
After discussion, motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by
Dan Blonigen, to increase the contract compensation to Patty
Salzwedel by 98, which equals a 4.5% annual adjustment based
on a two-year contract. Motion includes adjustments to the
fees charged to other cities for animal control services.
Motion carried unanimously.
Pago 2
O
Council Minutes - 6/11/90
7. Consideration of sidewalk inspection criteria and approval of
the sidewalk qrid system.
John Simola reported that he and Dan Blonigen worked toward
development of a sidewalk inspection criteria that could be
used to determine which sidewalks should be repaired or
replaced. Simola asked that Council take action on this
matter so that the sidewalks could be properly inventoried.
After discussion, motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by
Shirley Anderson, to approve the sidewalk inspection criteria
as submitted. Motion carried unanimously.
City Council then reviewed the proposed sidewalk grid system.
Ken Maus noted that the grid system could be used to tie into
the assessment policy. For instance, the cost to construct
non -grid area sidewalks should be fully assessed to the
property owner, whereas sidewalks located within the grid
system might be partially financed by the City, as they serve
a general public purpose.
A general discussion ensued regarding installation of sidewalk
along with the 7th Street/Minnesota Street improvement
project. Dan Blonigen noted that if we're going to put in a
sidewalk, we should look at installing it along the roadway.
Installation of sidewalks in this manner can be maintained
more efficiently.
John Simola noted that the best location is sometimes 20 feet
off the curb, as gas lines, telephone lines, utility poles,
etc., Interfere with sidewalks that are located directly along
side the curb line.
Council reviewed the proposed grid system submitted by John
Simola and Shirley Anderson.
After discussion, motion was made by Dan Blonigon, seconded by
Warren Smith, to approve in principal map #1 which outlines
the sidewalk grid system for the city of Monticello. Motion
carried unanimously.
Ken Maus noted that now that we have a policy in place for
sidewalk development that serves and overall purpose for the
community, we need to indicate which sidewalks in the
community are not necessary and, therefore, could be removed
or replaced if the sidewalk becomes sufficiently deteriorated.
Page 3
0
Council Minutes - 6/11/44
After discussion, motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by
Shirley Anderson, to adopt map i2 which outlines sidewalks
that could potentially be removed in the event that said
sidewalks located on map 42 become sufficiently deteriorated.
Motion carried unanimously.
Council discussed the potential for development of sidewalk
along with the 7th Street improvement project. It was noted
by John Simola that Minnesota Street and 7th Street are both
designated to include sidewalks, and the time is right to
develop sidewalks at these locations along with the 7th Street
improvement project. Furthermore, the project costs have come
in $47,000 below estimates, and the surplus funds could be
used for development of the sidewalks along 7th Street and
Minnesota Street.
After discussion, it was the general consensus of Council to
authorize Simola to prepare a change order to the 7th Street
improvement project which would call for development of
sidewalk on Minnesota Street and 7th Street.
8. Consideration of hirina public works department emolovee.
John Simola reported that at the last meeting the City Council
appointed Joe Xovich of Big Lake as the now operator/
mechanic for the public works department. After accepting the
position, Mr. xovich was offered a promotion and significant
pay Increase from his existing employer, Honeywell. He,
therefore, reconsidered the offer of employment from the City
of Monticello and turned down the offer. In response to the
situation, the selection committee recommended that Council
offer the position to its second choice, Mr. James Eisele of
713 West 4th Street. Mr. Eisele has had experience in the
past working with the Wright County Highway Department as a
mechanic/operator and with other firms as a truck driver. He
has a well-rounded background of skills rolating to the job
description and is noted in the community for his attention to
detail on any of his own projects.
After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson,
seconded by Dan Blonigen, to appoint Mr. James Eisele to the
position of operator/mechanic. Motion carried unanimously.
Pago 4
C
Council Minutes - 6/11/90
9. Consideration of investiaatinq possible purchase of property
within the City Hall block.
Administrator Wolfsteller reported that a parcel located on
Lots 2 and 3 on the block on which the City Hall is located is
available for sale. Wolfsteller asked Council to consider the
potential of purchasing this property in anticipation of
future expansion of City Hall.
Ken Maus noted that the property, although for sale at this
time, may also be available for sale at a relatively low price
in years to come. He went on to note that unless we have
specific plans to expand, we should wait to purchase the
property. Maus also noted that the City might wish to
consider buying the rear third of the two lots for sale which
could be used in conjunction with development of a larger
parking area.
Warren Smith concurred that we should look at purchasing the
the portion of the property that the City might need at this
time. No formal action was taken on this matter.
10. Consideration of adequacy of lease agreement between,
Monticello Theatre and Wright County State dank regarding use,
of parkinq areas developed for use by the Monticello Theatre.
The City Council was informed that the Monticello Theatre and
Wright County State Bank have entered into an agreement
governing the use of the parking lot developed by the bank for
use by the theatre. Council was asked to review the lease, as
it appears that the lease will not completely fulfill the
terms of the conditional use permit which requires full and
uninterrupted use of the parking stalls indefinitely. The
agreement struck provides the theatre with parking for, at a
minimum, five years. After the five year period, the theatre
has the option of extending the lease another five years.
Tom Hayes noted that the original conditional use permit
requirement was impossible to achieve, as Wright County State
Bank could not realistically tie up the land for the parking
area in perpetuity. He noted that the lease does accomplish
the goal of providing adequate parking, and the theatre owner
recognizes that the conditional use permit could be withdrawn
If the parking area is lost; therefore, the risk associated
with this situation falls on the theatre owner. Mr. Muller
was in attendance and recognized the risk that the
Page 5
v
Council Minutes - 6/11/90
conditional use permit would be invalid if the Wright County
State Bank parking area became inaccessible to the theatre
patrons. 1�
Si
After discussion, motion was made by Shirley Anderson,
seconded by Warren Smith, to approve the lease agreement as
presented and reaffirm the requirement that the conditional
use permit be subject to existence of a lease or such other
agreement as may be approved by the City Council. Motion
carried unanimously.
11. Appointment of Planninq Commission member.
Council reviewed the applications submitted by Jon Bogart and
Bruce Thielen.
Motion was made by Dan Blonigen to appoint Bruce Thielen to
fill the vacant Planning Commission position. Motion died for
lack of a second.
It was the consensus of Council that both applicants are
highly qualified and that it would be appropriate at this time
to conduct a more formal extended interview of both
candidates; therefore, a special meeting of the City Council
was scheduled for 6:30 p.m. on June 25, 1990, to be conducted
immediately prior to the regular meeting of the City Council.
12. Consideration of allowinq Lions Club to place banners alone
Broadway for Riverfest celebration.
John Simola noted that a county permit is not necessary if the
City okays the Lions Club request.
After discussion, a motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded
by Dan Blonigen, to authorize the Lions Club to place two
banners at selected locations across County Road 75 after
delivery of a certificate of insurance, a statement that the
banner and supporting ropes or cables be of a durable nature
and installed above 18 feet and will be maintained by the
Lions, a written authorization from utility companies and/or
building owners, and a permit if required from Wright County.
Motion carried unanimously.
Page 6
011
Council Minutes - 6/11/90
13. Consideration of establishinq a plastic recyclinq pilot
program.
John Simola reported that since initiation of the City of
Monticello's recycling program, there have been numerous
requests and comments from the citizens to look into the
possibility of recycling plastic. Plastic recycling has been
slow to start due to the difficulties associated with the many
resins in the plastics, lack of markets, and lack of
contractors willing to recycle plastic. Simola went on to
note that things have changed in the recent months. Several
markets have opened up for co -mingling plastics, and these
markets are available within 40 miles of Monticello and are
currently paying 4 cents per pound delivered. All in all, it
appears that the potential for marketing plastics economically
is increasing; therefore, Simola proposed that the City
authorize the recycling committee to set up a pilot program
for recycling of plastics which would entail setting up a
pilot curb -side recycling program and drop-off program for two
subdivisions in the city of Monticello for a period of three
months. The two methods for gathering plastic will be
evaluated with the City adopting the most cost efficient of
the two methods.
Ken Maus asked what other communities are recycling plastics.
John Simola noted that Brainerd is recycling plastics, along
with a few other communities.
Shirley Anderson noted that she didn't feel there was a need
for prizes anymore, as the public is actively recycling, and
the prizes may no longer be a factor in encouraging recycling.
John Simola noted that at some point we could curtail the
prizes; however, at this time, he felt it still does provide
a motivating force for recyclers.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson,
seconded by Dan Blonigon, to authorize the recycling committee
to set up a pilot curbside recycling program and drop-off
program for two subdivisions in the city of Monticello for a
period of three months. Motion carried unanimously.
14. Review of Heartland Express ridorshio and budget figures.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reviewed that ridership has
boon increasing steadily since the program started, with daily
ridership for May roportod at 69 rides. As of May 31, 1990,
the ridership mix is as follows:
Page 7
0
Council Minutes - 6/11/90
Elderly
408
Handicapped
48
Children
308
Toddlers
78
General Public
198
O'Neill went on to note that as each month goes by and more
people are using the bus, the miles per ride and cost per ride
ratios are improving. Warren Smith noted that the Heartland
Express has been a fine addition to the present list of City
services. Shirley Anderson noted that people are becoming
more creative in their use of the bus.
15. Review of results of ioint meetinq.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reviewed the results of the
joint meeting and asked for comments from Council regarding
future joint meeting formats. It was suggested that a
strategy should be developed to incorporate the viewpoint of
a broader cross section of the community.
16. Other items.
Pat Faltersack and two other residents from the Meadow Oaks
development voiced their concern regarding the potential for
low income, single family residences in the neighborhood. It
was their concern that the existing property values would be
hurt by the type of housing that might be placed in the
neighborhood.
Ken Maus noted that the Council is concerned about maintaining
property values. At the same time, if someone applies for a
permit and the applicant meets all of the building code
requirements, the City has no choice but to allow construction
of the home.
After discussion, Ken Maus suggested that City staff, along
with the property owners, the local developer, and the Farmers
Home Administration, set up a meeting at which time the group
could discuss strategy for minimizing the impact of the
development of lesser valued homes in the Meadow Oaks
subdivision.
Roger Mack reported that the Legion Club is looking at
development of a basketball court at the park located at Par
West. The Legion has volunteered to contribute $1,500 to help
Page 8
9
Council Minutes - 6/11/90
with the cement work necessary with the basketball court.
John Simola noted that City staff is capable of laying the
cement; however, staff is currently tied up on existing
projects.
It was the general consensus that City staff should attempt to
schedule time necessary to install the basketball court with
funding of materials being derived from the $1,500 to be
contributed by the Legion Club.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
„ (n Le
Jeff O'Neill
Assistant Administrator
I
Page 9
0
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
Consideration of withdrawing requirement that Kirkman Addition
(K -Mart) pondinq area be placed on the plat. (J.O.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
As you recall, at the previous meeting of the City Council
information regarding this item was included in the packet in
anticipation that Chuck DuFresne of The Lincoln Companies
would be present at the public comments/complaints portion of
the meeting. Mr. DuFresne did not attend the meeting;
however, Council did review the issue and generally reaffirmed
the previous decision. The item is formally placed on the
agenda, as The Lincoln Companies has submitted a formal
request that the pond easement be withdrawn as a requirement
of the plat.
The Lincoln Companies has noted that the conditional use
permit requirement stating that the site should not produce
run-off greater than 5 cubic feet per second sufficiently
protects the City. According to DuFresne, describing the site
drainage limitations in this general manner provides The
Lincoln Companies and any future property owner with the
option of redesigning the water storage area to meet future
property development needs while still protecting the City's
interest. The Lincoln Companies objects to the pond easement
requirement, as dictating the exact shape and depth of the
ponding area by easement limits future methods by which
drainage could be controlled in a manner achieving the 5 cubic
feet per second requirement.
Staff Is recommending that the City withdraw this requirement,
as the two major reasons for the requirement can be addressed
without formally placing the pond area on the plat. It has
been suggested that placing the pond area on the plat improves
the City's ability to remedy any changes made to the drainage
plan without the approval of the City of Monticello.
According to the City Attorney, the conditional use permit
provides a sufficient "hook" in the event the City needs to
take legal action against The Lincoln Companies or successors
for increasing water run-off beyond 5 cubic feet per second.
it has also been suggested that placement of the pond area on
the plat is necessary for future reference. If the pond is on
the plat, the City does not need to worry that the site
drainage limitations will not be forgotten. It may be that
this concern is slightly overstated, as there aro some simple
strategies we can adopt that will limit the potential of
forgetting about site drainage restrictions. For instance,
The Lincoln Companies has agreed to prepare and record a
document which specifically identifies the site drainage
limitation (5 c.f/socond). This Information will be revealed
to each prospective buyer during the standard title review
process. In addition, the City base map can be updated to
Include a notation identifying the drainage requirement, and
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
the drainage limitations can be placed in the City's easement
file. Finally, a notation could also be placed on the City
file copy of the final plat. These actions taken together
should assure the City that the drainage requirement is not
forgotten.
As noted earlier, the City Attorney and the City Engineer do
not have objections to withdrawing the pond easement
requirement.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
.1. Motion to direct withdrawal of the requirement that the
ponding area for the Kirkman Addition be placed on the
final plat. Direct staff and The Lincoln Companies to
prepare and record documentation outlining site drainage
restrictions and place the notation of restrictions on
the City base map.
Selecting this alternative would allow the plat to be
recorded, which would enable the 7th Street improvement
project to proceed. Not selecting this alternative might
hold up recording of the plat, which could possibly
jeopardize initiation of contract work.
Motion to affirm Council's previous decision to require
that the pond easement be placed on the plat.
If Council is not comfortable with the strategies for
maintaining a record of the site drainage requirements,
then placing the pond on the plat should remain a
requirement. if this alternative is selected, The
Lincoln Companies may request that the City purchase the
land encumbered by the drainage area and/or they may
request that the City maintain the pond. I do not know
if The Lincoln Companies would continue to withhold
placement of the ponding easement on the plat. If The
Lincoln Companies did not complete the platting process,
they would be In violation of the development agreement,
and it is likely that litigation would onsuo.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative NI for reasons stated above. The
relative benefit of having the ponding area on the map is not
significant when compared to the potential cost of litigation
and added expense associated with a guaranteed construction
delay.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of conditional use permit.
Council Minutes - 9/25/89
Uban also noted that KKE has responded to some suggestions by the City
Planner and OSM's traffic engineer which has resulted in an iiaprovement
to the traffic flow and parking plan as originally proposed at the
Planning Commission meeting of September 20, 1989. In addition, the
landscaping plan has been slightly modified to reflect his concerns.
Uban recommended that the City Council adopt the Planning Comnission
recoimwndations that a conditional use permit be granted to Lincoln
Campanies for the expansion of the existing mall subject to the
conditions noted by the Planning Commission.
Dan Kling reviewed the site drainage plans and noted that the water
discharging from the site should not exceed 5 cubic feet per second.
Ken Maus noted his concern regarding the traffic that will be created at
Highway 25 and 7th Street. Maus suggested that since the development is
highly dependent on the intersection and because the development will
create a significant increase in traffic in this area that it should in
the future participate in funding any street light improvements that
would be needed on Highway 25 and 7th Street.
After discussion, motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by Dan
8lonigen, to approve the conditional use permit subject to the following
conditions:
Approval of site drainage pians by the City Engineer. Excavation
permit provided only after site drainage plans have been approved
by the City Engineer. Storm water discharge from the site inust
be restricted to 5 cubic feet per second.
b. in the event the public iuprovements are installed privately, all
improvement specifications and construction must be approved by
the City Engineer.
c. Lincoln Co panies' dedication of land to the City which is
necessary for 7th Street alignment,
d. City acquisition of utility casement areas as defined by the
Building Inspector and City Engineer.
D. Alternate Bite plan approved contingent on meeting or exceeding
standards associated with site plan presented to City Council at
the meeting of September 25, 1989. John Uban and City staff
charged with evaluating and judging alternative site plan
relative to performance standards established with initial plan.
F. Staff and Planning Consultant approval of landscaping plans.
3. Planning Consultant and City Engineer approval of revised parking
plan.
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
5. Consideration of accepting the 1989 Audit Report for the City
of Monticello. (R.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Mr. Rick Borden and/or Kim Lillehaug of Gruys Johnson 6
Associates will be present at the meeting to present a brief
overview of the 1989 Audit Report recently completed.
A copy of the report was previously delivered to each Council
member this week for your review. I realize an 80 -page
document of this type is hard to review and analyze in less
than a week's time, but the report should be accepted by the
Council prior to the end of June, as it is to be submitted to
the state auditor by June 30, 1990. After the presentation of
the report by Gruys Johnson representatives, if the Council
feels that it would like additional time to review the report,
this item can again be scheduled at a future Council meeting
for further review, etc.
Should you have any specific questions regarding the
information presented in the audit report, you may contact
myself prior to Monday night's meeting, and I will try to
answer any questions you may have.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
The only action necessary by the Council is to accept the 1989
Audit Report as presented so that it may be submitted to the
state auditor by the required June 30 deadline.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Previously delivered copy of 1989 audit.
UvS �
1r
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
Consideration of accepting feasibility study, adopting
preliminary finance plan, and consideration of calling a
public hearing on utility improvements--Sandberq East. (J.O.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The following summarizes various issues associated with
residential development in the Sandberg East area followed by
a detailed explanation of the plan outlining a method of
financing public improvements in the area. The sewer and
water plan, along with the plat design now submitted to you,
results from considerable study of numerous options for
serving the area and also stems from numerous discussions and
meetings with the affected landowners. Please see the
feasibility study for more detail regarding other options for
serving the area. A number of details need to be worked out
with regard to the plan selected; however, basic concepts have
been given tentative approval by affected landowners. Prior
to a review of the finance plan, I would like to review
development history and outline issues associated with the
development of the Sandberg East property and the area in
general.
Brief History
Early in 1990, the City Council ordered the development of a
planning and engineering feasibility study in response to Vic
Hellman's request to build homes in the Sandberg East
development with private sewer systems. The City financed the
feasibility studios duo to the public purpose associated with
coordinating development design in the area. It was the goal
of Council to develop a plat and utilities design that would
be acceptable to all property owners and serve the area in a
cost efficient manner. The plan on the table represents the
property owners and City staff's best attempt at creating such
a plan.
Subsequent to Council ordering of the feasibility study, Vic
Hellman relinquished his rights to the property to Sandberg.
Private SeweriWater Systems Not Allowed Until Proven,
"Unfeasible" to Develop City Service to Area,
The Sandberg East plat was originally developed and approved
by the OAA under the promise that city utilities would be
feasible to Install in the future. Lots were to be sold two
at a time with homes developed on one-half of each property.
The theory was that when utilities were installed, property
owners would have the option of selling one-half of their
property to help finance the cost of the assessment. In
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
reality, the "overlay" plan quickly became history, as the
first family to purchase two lots placed their home smack in
the middle of their two -lot site.
Subsequent to the approval of the plat, Sandberg East became
part of the city as part of the annexation action concluded in
1988. Although Sandberg's attorney might dispute this point,
the moment the plat became part of the city, the rules
regarding development of sewer and water systems changed, and
thus the development lost its right to develop using private
sewer and water systems without a resolution from Council that
a public system is not feasible.
City ordinance does not allow development of private sewer and
water systems without development of a feasibility showing
that it is not possible to serve the area via city sewer and
water. The feasibility study presented to you at this time
provides cost figures associated with serving the area;
however, "economic feasibility" of the project is not as easy
to determine. John Sandberg has indicated that the project is
not feasible unless the assessments associated with the 16
lots located on Gilard are equal to or less than $90,000, or
about $6,000 per lot. The City could argue that the lots
will be increased in value by an amount greater than $6,000
per lot and, therefore, a larger assessment is justifiable.
The finance plan shows a cost per lot to Sandberg of about
$6,643 which, although more than what Sandberg wants to pay,
may be certainly economically feasible. If Sandberg wishes to
contest the City's view that the $6,643 cost per lot is not
economically feasible, he has the option of taking the City to
court to allow him to develop unsoworod lots. City Council
also has the option of shifting more of the cost to the
Sandberg East development but only to the extent that the
added value of the sewer and water could be recovered through
the sale of the lots. Shifting more cost to Sandberg could
result in Sandberg's loss of interest in obtaining city
uervices and result in Sandberg taking legal action against
the City for not allowing development of homes with private
sower systems.
It should be noted that Sandberg has offered to pay $90,000
immediately upon completion of the project.
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
City Plaved Role in Creating Need to Extend Utilities Across
Undeveloped Land
In determining to what extent the City should participate in
this project, it should be noted that the City may be somewhat
responsible for creating this undesirable situation where
utilities must be extended some distance to service a pre-
existing residential plat. Sandberg East plat was developed
prior to annexation, and the plat was developed in part as a
result of action taken by the City as a voting member of the
OAA Board. To what extent the City is now obligated to
participate in extending service to the area because of
previous City action contributing toward the creation of the
plat is debatable.
Housing Stock Diversification
In the past few years, the number of multiple family dwelling
units developed in the city has increased dramatically
relative to single family housing. In addition, development
of single family lots that has occurred has been limited to
the first time home buyer market. The Sandberg East/Norrel
development as proposed will be geared toward the middle/upper
income housing market. The development as proposed will
create the potential for 37 moderate sized lots in a
secluded/wooded area. Development of this site as proposed
will help diversify the City's housing stock and contribute
toward development of a well-rounded community.
Finance Plan
Following is a review of the attached finance plan. Please
note that numbered items below match rows of information on
the attached plan.
1. AREA IN SQUARE FT. Sewer and water assessments are based
on total area served with Phase I of the development
area. Streets and storm sewer improvements needed for
full development of Krautbauer and Norrel property are
not included with this portion of Phase I.
PERCENT OF TOTAL AREA. Sanitary sewer and water main
assessments are pro-ratod based on percent of total area
served. Nelson assessment is incorporated into Sandberg
and Norrol assessment. In exchange, Nelson is to convey
a portion of his property to Norrel/Sandberg.
TOTAL UNITS. Potential number of developable lots if
each lot equaled minimum lot size allowed in Monticello.
(12,000 sq. ft. per lot).
2
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
4. COST/UNIT. Cost per lot if property is developed at
12,000 sq. ft. per lot minimum.
5. PROPOSED LOTS. Total lots proposed per each area.
Average lot size est. --17,332.
6. COST/LOT. Cost per lot to each property owner under
proposed lot design and finance plan.
7. EST. AVERAGE LOT SIZE. Average lot size. Sandberg and
Norrel average lot size is slightly inflated because
total areas include a portion of Nelson's property.
B. STREET. No street improvement is included with this
portion of Phase I.
9/10 SEWER - WATER. Total cost and pro -rated share of sewer
and water main assessment. Property owner share is based
on percentage of total project area including street
right-of-ways. City portion financed is equal to benefit
attributable to the east or township side of Gilard.
This amount is to be captured at such time that the
facility is used by Tyler East properties.
11. STORM SEWER. No storm sewer improvement is included with
this portion of Phase I.
12. LIFT STATION CHARGE. All lots served by lift station are
to pay a portion of cost to develop the lift station.
Lift station charge calculated is based on the number of
lots to be developed multiplied by a unit price of $168.
13. INTEREST EXPENSE. Norrel's remaining lots and
Krautbauer's property aro to be assessed on a deferred
basis interest free for a period of throe years. This
interest rate is equal to the rate established with the
original assessment roll and will include a 10 -year
payback schedule with payments starting in year four and
ending in year ten. Krautbauer's deferred assessment
total equals $61,714. Norrols' deferred assessment total
equals $91,261. Deferring said assessments will cost the
City approximately $30,000 In Interest payments over
three years.
7
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
Policy Implications:
Why should Council consider deferral of assessments as part of
its assessment policy? Deferral of assessments as proposed
with the current project is suggested as a strategy to buffer
the financial impact of the "leap -frog" of city utilities on
property owners that do not necessarily desire public
improvements. The three-year deferral provides time for the
development area to mature and improves the chances that the
property can eventually be developed economically, which
reduces the chance that the City will get the property through
tax forfeiture. It should be noted that even with the
deferral, there is no guarantee that the assessments will be
paid on a timely basis.
At present, when the City places utility lines across lands
that are not "ripe" for development, City policy requires
immediate assessment of benefit which carries with it the
somewhat unrealistic expectation that assessments will be paid
just because the assessments have been placed on the tax
rolls. Instead of prompt payment of assessments, the City may
end up acquiring the property through tax forfeiture, which no
one benefits from. It might be that a policy to defer
interest expenses under circumstances similar to this project
may result in fewer assessment payment delinquencies.
In addition, the cost to the City or to the developer
requesting services to defer interest is a real expense that
the City or developer must face at the front end of projects
that call for crossing undeveloped property. This up -front
cost would serve to temper the desire to extend utilities in
a leap -frog manner.
Other Issues
ALTERNATIVE DESIGN --EXTEND UTILITIES ALONG HWY 39 THEN AROUND
HALLIGER TREE FARM
City staff researched the potential of extending sanitary
sewer and water along C.R. 39 then south on Gilard. This
option was not considered as the first alternative; however,
in the event the first alternative fails to receive support
from Krautbauor, this alternative remains a possibility.
At the most, 24 developable lots could be created with a
total project cost savings of only 12% ($36,000). On the
other hand, extending utilities through Krautbauor and
Norrol properties croates the potential for development
of 37 lots.
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
The Halliger property is not part of the city at this
time. It would be impossible to assess the property
until it is within the city limits.
Extension of sewer and water to the Halliger property
should be done in conjunction with development of the lot
layout for the property. It is probable that the Halliger
property could be serviced more efficiently by a sanitary
sewer and water main system that is designed in
conjunction with the design of the Halliger plat. It may
not be a good idea to simply place the sewer and water
lines on the county road right-of-way in front of the
four -acre Halliger plat, as doing so may result in the
need for long individual service lines, and the utilities
could possibly interfere with the development of a
frontage road or driveways.
If the Halliger property were to be assessed on a front
footage basis, it is likely that the assessment would be
at least $70,000, which is not palatable to Halliger even
with a deferral.
KRAUTBAUER ASSESSMENTS— 1988 COUNTY ROAD 39 PROJECT
The proposal above also includes Mr. Krautbauer's requirement
that the assessments levied against the Krautbauer project be
amended as follows:
Storm Sewer
It is proposed to assess Krautbauer for the Storm water
assessment at such time that run-off from the property is
directed to the culvert installed as part of the project. At
this time, it is not certain that a development located on the
Krautbauer site will actually utilize the culvert installation
that was financed in part by the Krautbauer assessment. If
storm water from the site can be managed entirely on the site,
then no assessment would be paid by Krautbauer for this
improvement. The principle amount assessed for this
Improvement is $13,006.
Lift Station Charqe
The original lift station charge that Krautbauer objects to
was established using a formula that may not equitably
distribute lift station benefit. The original lift station
charge was levied on a unit basis with each lot being one
unit. At the time of the original lift station assessment,
City staff estimated that Krautbauer would be able to develop
98 some units. It appears now that the Krautbauer site may
not be able to accommodate 98 lots. Consequently, the
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
Krautbauer unit assessment appears unfair, as it does not
reflect the number of units he can actually develop and sell.
Krautbauer requests that his lift station charge be amended to
reflect the number of lots he can develop on the site
according to a recently completed sketch plan completed by
Otto Associates Surveyors. The sketch plan submitted by
Krautbauer reveals a total of 74 lots, which is 24 lots less
than the original estimate. Under this scenario, the lift
station assessment would be modified to reflect 70 rather than
98 developable lots. If Krautbauer ultimately platted more
than 70 lots, his property would be assessed accordingly.
Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Assessment
Mr. Krautbauer also requests that Council consider a
"reassessment" of the original sanitary sewer and water main
assessment associated with the Highway 39 project. It is
proposed that the original assessment levied against the
Krautbauer property of $81,225 for sewer and water
improvements be deferred retroactively in the same manner as
proposed for the project now on the table. Under this
proposal, Krautbauer's interest would accumulate on the
principle amount of $81,225 as required by the existing
assessment schedule. Interest would start accruing during
year four. Retroactive deferral of assessment interest for
three years amounts to an added expense to the City of
$21,321.
This aspect of the entire "deal" is probably the most
controversial, as a retroactive deferral may leave the
Impression of creating a precedent that would enable other
property owners associated with other projects to request the
same deferral of assessments already in place. On the other
hand, according to the City Attorney, this case is somewhat
unique in that there are no other properties with matching
circumstances. No other properties have been assessed for
sewer and water lines that have been installed only part way
through the parcel with same lines needing to be extended in
the future. Furthermore, Mr. Krautbauer does not appear
Interested in participating in this project without a deferral
of his existing assessment. Krautbauer participation, though
Important, is not critical, as the water and sewer lines can
be run around his property.
If Council is not comfortable with a retroactive deferral, it
might be possible that Krautbauer would participate in the
current project if the terms of payment on the current project
are improved. For instance, Council could increase the length
of the deferral on the current project from throe to five
10
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
years based on the logic that this is the second "leap" across
Krautbauer's land in three years, which sets it apart from
Norrel's situation.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Motion to accept feasiblity study and modify and adopt
finance plan for development of sewer and water utilities
to the Sandberg East development and order development of
plans and specifications subject to developer providing
a security of $17,000 and subject to all property owners
waiving the public hearing notice requirement. In the
event a waiver of notice is not obtained from each
property owner, the Council must call for a public
hearing on the improvement.
Under this alternative, Council adopts the plan as Is or
makes minor changes, and staff, working with the property
owners, would begin preparation for a public improvement
project in late summer 1990. As noted in the finance
plan, the cost to the City under this alternative is
$69,000, which includes interest cost and a portion of
the cost to extend the sewer and water line to a position
where it can be used by properties east of Gilard Avenue.
In addition, this alternative requires amendments to
Krautbauer's Highway 39 project assessment. As noted
earlier, Sandberg does not feel that it is economically
feasible to spend more than $90,000 to develop 16 lots,
including Nelson's. Adoption of the plan as proposed
calls for a cost of around $103,000, which may cause
Sandberg to fight development of public improvements.
If Sandberg and the other property owners are in
agreement with Council actions, then Council may be asked
to order development of plans and specifications. The
cost of plans and specifications amounts to $17,000. As
with other de,,elopment proposals, Council should request
that Sandberg submit a letter of credit in the amount of
$17,000 to be reimbursod at such time that the project is
ordered. The cost of the plans is to be incorporated
into the assessment figures. A public hearing on the
project could be waived upon consent by affected property
owners.
The platting process would also occur with a now plat
submitted to the Planning Commission for review at the
August mooting.
2. Motion to accept feasibility study and deny City
participation in the development of utilities. Allow
development of private sower and water systems.
UL
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
It could be demonstrated that it is not economical for
the Sandberg East development to finance the entire cost
to develop sewer and water services. Placing the entire
financial burden on the Sandberg East lots is not
possible, as the lots cannot be sold for a figure greater
than the original land cost plus the cost to serve each
lot. The cost to develop each lot equals $18,000 per lot
not counting the cost of the land.
Allowing the area to develop without city services would
create the potential for a long-term environmental
problem, which will only be resolved when the development
is ultimately served by city services. If the area
develops private systems, it will never be easy to
install services in the area, as there will always be
some property owners that have relatively new private
systems. The easiest time for development of the public
system is now when only one home owner is in place.
In addition, a significant investment in infrastructure
leading to the development area has been made that will
be left unused for the many years between the time
private systems develop and the time that the area is
ultimately served by city systems. Furthermore, the
number of lots that can be developed will be decreased,
which results in a loss of efficiency In the delivery of
public services. Fewer taxpayers per general area is
less efficient and in the long run will add cost.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Council accept the feasibility study and
approve the finance plan as outlined. Further action to order
plans and specifications or to call for a public hearing
depends on individual property owner response to the plan.
Following are major reasons why staff recommends that the plan
be adopted:
This plan is a result of considerable discussion between
City staff and affected property owners and is generally
supported by all parties involved. A major deviation
from this plan could result in the collapse of efforts to
coordinate the proper development of the area.
It appears that this plan calls for the most cost
efficient method for serving the area with city sewer and
water. Other design strategies for installing sower and
water do not achieve a desired cost per lot.
12
C
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
Development of private systems should be strongly
discouraged due to long term environmental and cost
considerations. Adopting the plan will eliminate the
potential for development of private systems.
The proposed plat layout combines various properties in
a manner that will achieve the highest and best use of
the property for residential purposes.
Development of middle/higher income housing will help
diversify the existing housing stock and will serve to
offset a recent trend which has witnessed rapid
development of multi -family and lower end single family
housing.
The finance plan calls for Sandberg paying $103,000,
which is $13,000 more than his stated upper limit of
$90,000. Staff recommends that Council hold somewhat
firm on Sandberg's portion, as it is difficult to justify
reducing Sandberg's portion further. Please keep in mind
that the actual project costs may come in less than
estimates; and if they come in 108 less than projected,
Sandberg will end up paying the amount he hoped to pay.
SUPPORTING DATA
Finance plan; Sewer and water plan; Proposed plat design;
Feasibility study; Feasiblity study addendum.
13
SANDBERG EAST/NORREL/KRAUTBAUER DEVELOPMENT
- FINANCE PLAN -JUNE 11,
1990
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
TOTAL
NORREL
SANDBERG
NELSON
KRAUT
CITY
TOTAL
IPHASEI
BAUER
AREA IN
I1.
SQUARE FT
842,995
301.310
339,185
0
202,500
no
842,995
(includes
Nelsons')
PERCENT OF
1
12.
TOTAL AREA '
36%
40%
0%
24%
no
100
3. TOTAL UNITS
53
19
21
0
13
no
53
(TOTAL SOFT/75%/12000)
4. COST/UNIT
$4,846
$4,867
SO
$4,076
no
$6,171
Vrt��
5. PROPOSED LOTS
3_7
11.47
15.53
0
10
no
6th
i
X15
8. COST/LOT
��'
$7,956
$6,643
$0
$6,171
no
L
7. EST AVERAGE LOT SIZE
17,088
19.702
16,380
$0
15.188
16. STREET
0
30
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
9. SEWER
$167,000
$52,184
$58.744
$0
$35,071
$21,000
$167,000
10. WATER
5122,000
$37,173
$41,845
$O
$24,982
$18,000
$122,000
11. STORM SEWER
$O
$0
$0
$O
SO
50
$0
112. LIFT STATION CHARGE
$6,142
$1,904
$2,578
$0
$1,660
$0
$6,142
13. INTEREST EXPENSE
$30,000
$0
50
$0$0
$30,000
$30.000
$325,142
$91,261
$103.187
30
$61,714
$69,000
3325,142
ADJUSTMENT AMOUNT
95%
$88,698
$98,009
$0
$58,628
O
Phase t
Sanitary Sewer
Water
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
` 2G' RCP A _--&
!
Ncirre WF 00pert, - -
' ` 3" per
f perF�
i}
000=iW
1 u aoe• _ ,!, ��
M '
-call
L1� ),
1 JJ 1L
00" 0 IS' 700 600 F"1 KRAUTBAUER PROPERTIES
—� D'C.P4 LUe Com— 40
p S STPEETS ANO STORM SEWER 4557
IncSANOSERG EAST &
KRAUTBAUER PROPERTIES gyp' Nq
^� • "'"'�" ^ "" • ""
Monticello, Minnesota
PH .SE t
0
I
Orr
schelen
�� Mayeron&
AiSocialcs, Inc.
1021 1: ,, Ile.—pu, Al—I
I Ml_ -IN 41S MN 55413
;,12-J3 1-tlM,11
In\ 1,11�3NIln
I nq,nrcls
Sun•cr0rs
MEMORANDUM rWnnrrs
TO: Mr. Jeff O'Neill, Assistant Administratpr, City of Monticello
FROM: Bret A. Weiss, Project Enginee
DATE: June 7, 1990
SUBJECT: Sandberg East & Kraulbauer Properties Concept Plans
OSM Comm. No. 4557.00
This memorandum is in direct response to the above referenced report originally submitted
in February 1990 and revised in April 1990. The latest revision included a breakdown of
the owners' preferred alternative separated into 3 individual phases. The final selected
alternative, as of a meeting of all affected property owners in April 1990, was named #211-
A. This represents Alternative 2 Revised using utility method A. The utility method refers
to the sanitary sewer lateral along Gillard Avenue. This preferred method A results in one
sanitary sewer line from the south edge of Sandberg East to the north ultimately discharging
into the trunk line along County Road 39 at the Krautbauer parcel.
Included in this memorandum is a breakdown of costs for constructing streets and utilities
for Phase I of Alternative #211-A. Phase 1, for this memorandum, includes 10, 1, 11 and
13 proposed lots for the Krautbauer, Nelson, Sandberg and Norrel owned properties,
respectively.
The City staff has developed two methods for determining possible assessments for the
proposed construction of Phase 1. The first method assumes no city participation with the
associated owners assuming full cost and the second method acknowledges a portion of the
sanitary sewer and watermain costs to be City responsibility. The justification for City
participation stems from the fact that the proposed sewer line can adequately serve the lots
on the east side of Gillard Avenue and therefore these lots should participate in the cost.
lowever, this property is not located in the City limits and can not be assessed until a later
date. Thus, the City would front these costs until the property is annexed by the City or the
property owners request service.
The street and utility improvements for the specified areas are as follows:
1. Ile street construction of the entire Phase I will he limited to serving lots that will
be served by the proposed utilities. The Krautbauer and Outlot A Sandberg East
parcels each will require approximately 800 lineal feet of street construction. The
proposed project cost for this improvement is estimated at S84,000 with a $43,000
and 541,000 assessment to the Krautbauer and Norrel parcels, respectively (See
Figure No. 211).
O
Memorandum
June 7, 1990
OSM Comm. No. 4557.00
2. The storm sewer construction consists of lateral collection piping for the above
referenced streets. The proposed project cost is estimated at $68,000 with a $36,000
and $32,000 assessment to the Krautbauer and Norrel parcels, respectively (See
Figure No. 211).
3. The sanitary sewer originates from County Road 39 at the Krautbauer parcel
continues through the Norrel property and extends to the south the length of Gillard
Avenue. The assessment is estimated based on total area of each individual property
owner. The area includes the associated streets, including the City and Sandberg
sharing the Gillard Avenue portion. The financial responsibility of each property
owner is determined by percentage based on the total affected area. These
percentages vary between the two methods due to the City's participation in Method
2. The appropriate percentages and costs are tabulated on the following page. The
proposed total project cost for the sanitary sewer is estimated at $167,000 (See
Figure No. 711).
4. The watermain is proposed to parallel the sanitary sewer and will be assessed in the
same manner as the sanitary sewer. The proposed assessments are shown in the
following table. The proposed total project cost for the watermain is estimated at
$122.000 (See Figure No. 12R).
The total breakdown of cost for the two various methods are as follows:
Norrel
$182,820
$153,920
Sandberg
98,260
72,250
Nelson
11,560
8,670
Krautbauer
148,360
131,020
City
Q
75.140
TOTAL
$441,000
$441,000
Detailed cost estimates can be found in the back of this report. The above referenced total
estimated project cost incudes a contingency factor and all related indirect costs. Indirect
costs are estimated at 24% and include legal, engineering, administrative and fiscal costs.
C BAW/cmw
06/90 -memo
Memorandum
June 7, 1990
OSM Comm. No. 4557.00
PHASE 1 - METHOD
1 - NO CITY PARTICIPATION
NORREL
SANDBERC
Proposed Lots
13
11
Area (SF)
321,600
287,440
% of Total Area
38
34
Street Assessment
S41,000
0
Storm Sewer
S 32,000
0
Assessment
$84.000
0
Sanitary Sewer
$63,460
S56,780
Assessment
$ 40,080
0
Watermain
S46.3
S41,48
Assessment
S122,QQ4
$ 11,560
TOTAL
$182,820
$98,260
NELSON
KRAUTBAUER
CITY
TOTAL
1
10
0
35
31,455
202,500
0
842,995
4
24
0
100
0
$43,000
0
$84.000
0
$36,000
0
S68,000
S 6,680
$ 40,080
0
$167,000
S 4.880
S29,28
.1
S122,QQ4
$ 11,560
$148,360
0
$441,000
Memorandum
June 7, 1990
OSM Comm. No. 4557.00
ITY PARTICIPATION
NORREL SANDBERG
Proposed Lots
13
11
Area (SF)
321,600
287,440
% of Total Area
28
25
Street Assessment
$41,000
0
Storm Sewer
$32,000
0
Assessment
0
$43.000
Sanitary Sewer
S46,760
$41,750
Assessment
0
S 68,000
Watermain
S 34.160
S30.5
Assessment
S 3.660
S 21.960
TOTAL
$153920
$ 72,250
NELSON
KRAUTBAUER
CITY
TOTAL
1
10
0
35
31,455
202,500
292,800
1,135,795
3
18
26
100
0
$43.000
0
S 84,000
0
$36.000
0
S 68,000
$ 5,010
$30,060
$43,420
S 167,000
S 3.660
S 21.960
S31,72
S 122,
$ 8,670
$131,020
$75,140
$441,000
z
C
Memorandum
June 7, 1990
OSM Comm. No. 4557.00
STREET CONSTRUCTION
KRAUTBAUER PROPERTY
DESCRIPTION
Subgrade Preparation
6" Aggregate Base (Class 5)
1-1/2" Wear Course Mix (2341)
1-1/2" Base Course Mix (2331)
Bituminous Mat'I for Mix (6.5%)
Bituminous Mat'I for Tack Coat
Concrete Curb & Gutter
(Surmountable)
Permanent Barricades
QUANTITY !1M UNIT PRICE
8
RS
$ 100.00
1,180
Ton
$ 10.00
260
Ton
$ 14.00
260
Ton
S 12.00
35
Ton
$ 140.00
160
Gal
S 1.50
1,600
LF.
S 5.00
1 Pair S 500.00
SUBTOTAL
5% Contingency
24% LEAF
TOTAL
NOTE: It is assumed that the rough grading will be completed by others.
EXTENSION
$ 800.00
$11,800.00
$3,640.00
S 3,120.00
$ 4,900.00
$ 240.00
$8,000.00
S 500.00
$33,000.00
1.650.E
$34,650.00
8.316.00
$43,000.00
C
C
Memorandum
June 7, 1990
OSM Comm. No. 4557.00
STREET CONSTRUCTION
SANDBERG EAST/OUTLOT A SANDBERG EAST
DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY LIN UNIT PRICE
EXTENSION
Subgrade Preparation
8
RS
$ 100.00
$ 800.00
6" Aggregate Base (Class 5)
1,150
Ton
S 10.00
S11,500.00
1-1/2" Wear Course Mix (2341)
250
Ton
S 14.00
$3,500.00
1-1/2" Base Course Mix (2331)
250
Ton
$ 12.00
$3,000.00
Bituminous Mat'l for Mix (6.5%)
33
Ton
S 140.00
S4,620.00
Bituminous Mat'l for Tack Coat
125
Gal
$ 150
S 18750
Concrete Curb & Gutter
1,500
LF.
S 5.00
S7,500,
(Surmountable)
SUBTOTAL
$31,108.00
5% Contingency
1.555.00
532,663.00
24% LEAF
7,839,
TOTAL
TOTAL
$41,000.00
Memorandum
June 7, 1990
OSM Comm. No. 4557.00
STORM SEWER
KRAUTBAUER PROPER in'
Alternative 2R -A Phase I
DESCRIPTION
18" R.C.P.
15" R.C.P.
12" R.C.P.
48" MH
CBMH
CB
18" Apron
C
QUANTITY = UNIT PRICE
500
LF.
S 28.00
50
LF.
$ 25.00
160
LF.
$ 20.00
1
Each
$1,000.00
5
Each
S1,000.00
1
Each
$ 800.00
2
Each
$1,000.00
SUBTOTAL
5% CONTINGENCY
24% LEAF
TOTAL
EXTENSION
S 14,000.00
S 1,250.00
S 3,200.00
S 1,000.00
S 5,000.00
S 800.00
S 2.000.00
$27,250.00
1.363.00
$28,613.00
$36,000.00
Memorandum
June 7, 1990
OSM Comm No. 4557.00
STORM SEWER
SANDBERG EAST/OUTLOT A SANDBERG EAST
DESCRIPTION
OUANTIIY
= UNIT PRICE
EXTENSION
18" R.C.P.
460
LF. S 28.00
S 12,880.00
15" R.C.P.
130
LF. S 25.00
S 3,250.00
12" R.C.P.
90
LF. $ 20.00
S 1,800.00
CBMH
3
Each $1,000.00
S 3,000.00
CB
3
Each $ 800.00
S 2,400.00
18" Apron
1
Each $1,000.00
$ 1.000.00
SUBTOTAL
$24,330.00
5% CONTINGENCY
1.217.00
$ 25,547.00
24% LEAF
6.131.00
TOTAL
$32,000.00
ILI
Memorandum
June 7, 1990
OSM Comm, No. 4557-00
SANITARY SEWER
KRAUTBALT, R/SANDBERG EAST/OUTLOT A SANDBERG EAST
DESCRIPTI N
QUANTITY I= UNIT PRICE
EXTENSION
8' PVC SDR 35
730
LF.
$
16.00
$11,680.00
8' PVC SDR 26
2,550
LF.
$
30.00
S76,500.00
SM MH 0-10'
12
Each
$1,200.00
$14,400.00
Excess MH Depth
74
LF.
S
75.00
S 5,550.00
Break into Existing 12' ?VC
I
L.S.
$
- -
$ 2,000.00
8" x 4" WYES
35
Each
$
75.00
S 2,625.00
C PVC SDR 26
1,300
LF.
S
10.00
S 13,000.00
Restoration
I
L.S.
S
- -
$ 3,000,
SUBTOTAL
$128,755.00
5% CONTINGENCY
6,438.00
$135.193.00
24% LEAF
32-446,
TOTAL
$167,000.00
0
Memorandum
June 7, 1990
OSM Comm. No. 4557.00
WATERMAIN
KRAUTBAUER PROPERTY/SANDBERG EAST/OUTLOT A SANDBERG
Alternative 2R Phase 1
EAST
-A
DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
IM
UNIT PRICE
EXTENSION
12" D.I.P. Class 50
125
LF.
S 22.00
S 2,750.00
8" D.I.P. Class 52
3,310
LF.
S 15.00
S49,650.00
12" Gate Valves
1
Each
S 800.00
S 800.00
8" Gate Valves
9
Each
S 500.00
$ 4,500.00
Hydrants w/6" Gate Valves
7
Each
$1,400.00
S 9,800.00
6" Hydrant Lead Class 52
117
LF.
S 13.00
$ 1,521.00
{ Fittings
3,200
Lbs
$ 2.00
S 6,400.00
1" Corporation Stop
35
Each
S 60.00
$ 2,100.00
1" Curb Stop & Box
35
Each
$ 100.00
$ 3,500.00
1" Copper Service Pipe
1,300
LF.
S 10.00
$ 13,000,
SUBTOTAL
$94,021.00
5% CONTINGENCY
4"701.00
S 98,722.00
24% LEAF
23.691,E
TOTAL
$122,000.00
'Restoration is included with the Sanitary Sewer.
C
z
z
MISSISSIPPI RIPER
i 24' RCP 419 z
r— j _ urr wits
PROPOSEC 7y I — f I ``,
"SFBRM WATER
PONE)
tL
BUILDABLE LOTS�+ I C_"K
CITY LIMITS
SCALE V- 707 0 lh 700
�,�•'
By
p�r�e- 3er.f.a
Ye7eree 6
Z_.e
...•c1.6... tnc
217193
.w 0- •+w.
Goo Feet KRAUTBAUER PROPERTIES
Come- %0
STP.EETS AND STORM SEWER 057
SANDBERG EAST 5
KRAUTBAUER PROPERTIES F9• No.
Monticel!o. Minnesota 2R
-- PHASE 1
Y!SSISSIPPI RIVER
1
r 9
i \
�VCITt
T, all
lot
\—
` �• /' Jam; .
z
.-� PHASE 1
z SCALE 1'•700 700 600 Feet KRAUTBAUER PROPERTIES
}20- 31 1�c.-; '_:e Comm. *40
gw oC►� SANITARY SEWER 4557
Se A.:. a
CAXYa7e:oa a SAVDBERG EAST b
x'e ""Ot0''"•Inc KRAUTBAUER PROPERTIES Fig No.
.�....... �....,.,.. • .,.... R
217190 Monticello„ Minnesota
•
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
x Q 9
SCALE 1'9300' 0 1S0 700
''OM By
p��rr
lehll!•
(layef00
�
001
associates. IOC.
4p.w+. Jar..l.r• ►I..r..
V 71'90
rd
600 Feel KRAUTBAUER PROPERTIES
1^pa�r� !dl! Comm NO
WATERMAIN 4557
SANOBERG EAST i
KRAUTBAUER PROPERTIES Fig. NO.
Monticello„ Minnesota 12R
- PH/SE 1
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
7. Consideration of acceptance of sidewalk inspection report and
orderinq public hearincl. (J.S.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
An inspection has been made of all the existing sidewalks
within the city of Monticello based upon the inspection
criteria approved by the City Council at the previous meeting.
Based upon that criteria, the inspector noted any areas where
preventive maintenance is needed and any areas where repairs
or replacement are necessary. The report as presented with
this agenda item is broken into two sections, one covering
those existing sidewalks on the current or future grid, and
another covering those sidewalks off the grid in areas where
the property owner has the option to remove rather than repair
or replace.
The report itself gives sufficient data to identify the
property and indicates the general defects of the sidewalk and
the criteria by which those defects were measured. The actual
detailed, technical inspection of each sidewalk section is not
part of the actual report but is available for reference by
the City Council or residents.
If the Council accepts the report as drafted, they should
order a public hearing to be held on July 9. At the public
hearing, a summary of the report will be given, and the more
specific detailed inspection notes will be available. At the
close of the public hearing, City Council can order the repair
and replacement of the various sidewalks again giving those
individuals off the grid the option to remove. It is
important after the public hearing that the Council also
establish their formal policy for same. Prior to the next
meeting, information will be presented to Council regarding a
recommended policy and the policies of other nearby
communities.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to accept the sidewalk
inspection report as drafted and order a public hearing
on the report for July 9.
2. The second alternative would be to modify, expand, or
reduce the sidewalk inspection report and call for a
public hearing on July 9 based upon the modified report.
3. The third alternative would be to do nothing.
14
11
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the
City Council accept the inspection report as drafted and order
a public hearing for July 9 as outlined in alternative N1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Resolution calling for public hearing; Copy of the inspection
report; Copy of the criteria; Maps.
15
/ RESOLUTION 90 -
RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND
CALLING FOR A HEARING ON SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has completed a sidewalk
Inspection report on the conditions of the existing sidewalks
within the city, and
WHEREAS, the report has identified various sidewalks that are In
need of repair and/or replacement, and this report was received by
the City Council on June 25, 1990.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO:
The Council will consider the Improvements of such sidewalk in
accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting
property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, at an estimated
total cost of the Improvement of $
2. A public hearing shall be held on such improvement on the
7S day of J N/y 1 1990, In the Council
Chambers of the City' Hall at 7:00 p.m., and the City
Administrator shall give mailed and published notice of such
hearing and improvement as required by law.
Adopted this 25th day of June, 1990.
City Administrator
C
Mayor
0
CITY OF MONTICELLO
1990 ANNUAL SIDEWALK INSPECTION
The enclosed reports are the result of visual inspection of all the
sidewalks in the city as of June 19, 1990. These reports are
broken down into groups of sidewalks 1) not on the public sidewalk
grid, 2) part of future (3-5 year and 5-10 year) grids, and 3) part
of the accepted (1-3 year) grid for 1990. Included are condensed
individual street by street locations, sidewalk conditions,
recommendations based on inspection criteria, lists of property
owners to be contacted, and maps showing locations of needed
repairs. Maps M6 and p7 are in numerical order with the previous
report on sidewalk grids. Map #6 uses yellow to show locations of
suggested repairs or removal of sidewalks not on the public grid.
Map M7 uses yellow to show accepted grid, red to show areas of
needed repair on the accepted grid, and blue to show areas of
proposed grid in need of maintenance.
A full report compiled from field notes with exact locations of
cracks, settlements, etc., with an index will be made available at
City Hall and Public Works.
This report is submitted for Council approval June 25, 1990, so
that upon approval as per City Ordinance, property owners can be
contacted, repair orders sent, and a public hearing set.
C SIDEWALK.CC: 6/18/90
0
SIDEWALKS NOT ON GRID (Map #1)
#1 River Street (north side)
Maple --Linn
Majority of sidewalk cracked, settled, and heaved. Repair or
remove as per criteria II. A. 1 6 2; II. B. 2 & 5; II. C. 1.
#2 River Street (north side)
Wright --Ramsey
Some cracks and heaved panels at trees and below boulevard in
some areas. Repair or remove as per criteria II. A. 1, 2;
II. B. 2, 5; and H. C. 1.
03 River Street (south side)
Pine --Cedar
No repairs needed.
04 River Street (south side)
Ceder --Palm
Sidewalk is slightly below boulevard grade with one small
vertical. Repair or remove as per criteria II. A. 1;
II. B. 1; and H. C. 1.
#5 Broadway (north side)
Minnesota --Maple
Cracks, some settlements, boulevard higher than sidewalk in
areas, heaving due to trees, light spauling in areas. Repair
or remove as per criteria II. A. 1, 2; II. B. 1, 5, 6;
II. C. 1.
#6 Broadway (north side)
Maple --Linn
Areas of heavy cracking, settling, and overgrowth, some
smaller cracks and one vertical rise at church. Repair as per
criteria II. A. 2; II. B. 2, 5; and II. C. 1.
C SIDEWALR.cC: 6/18/90 Page I
0
#7 Broadway (north side)
1,
Palm --New
Cracks, vertical rise, settlements, and overgrowth in areas
and no sidewalk in areas. Remove or repair as per criteria
II. A. 1, 2, 3; II. B. 1, 2, 3; and II. C. 1.
#8 3rd Street (north side)
New --Wright
No repairs needed.
#9 3rd Street (south side)
Pine --Cedar
Cracks and settlements in small (2'x2') panel portion of
sidewalk. Repair or remove as per criteria II. A. 2;
II. B. 2, 5; and II. C. 1.
#10 4th Street (north sidel
Minnesota --Maple
Some cracks and one settlement causing vertical rise. Repair
or remove as per criteria II. A. 2; II. B. 1; and II. C. 1.
#11 4th Street (north side)
Cedar --Palm
Cracks, weeds growing in cracks, heaving from trees,
settlements, and boulevard above sidewalk in areas. Remove or
repair as per criteria II. A. 1, 2; II. B. 2, 3, 5; and
II. C. 1.
#12 4th Street (south sidel
Maple --Linn
Pedestrian ramp only --may be removed at property owner's
discretion.
C SIDEWALK.CC: 6/18/90 Pago 2
0
#13
4th Street (south side)
Linn--walnut
Cracks, two vertical rises at church; cracks, settlements,
overgrowth, and spauling past Sunny Fresh. Remove or repair
as per criteria H. A. 1, 2, 3; 11. B. 1, 2, 4, 6; and
II. C. 1.
#14
4th Street (south side)
Pine--Cedar
Small cracks In sidewalk one panel at a driveway with a broken
settled corner. Repair or remove as per criteria II. A. 2;
and II. B. 2.
NOTE: I would recommend that City Council place this sidewalk
on grid and delete the west half of the north side of street
(item #50), as this sidewalk is In much better shape than the
one across the street.
#15
Linn Street (west side)
River--Broadway
Cracks, settlements, panels heaved from tree roots and weed
growth in cracks. Remove or repair as per criteria
II. A. 2, 3; 11. B. 1, 2, 4, 5; and 1j. C. 1.
016
Locust Street (west side)
River Street --Broadway
One crack in north radius of parking lot entrance. Repair as
per criteria II. A. 2.
917
Locust Street (east side)
River Street --Broadway
Cracks in panels. Ropair as per criteria Il. A. 2.
#18
Palm Street (east side)
Broadway--3rd Street
Heaving and settling of panels; large troos grown across
sidewalk. Removo or repair as per criteria 11. A. 3;
11. B. 1, 2; and 11. C. 1.
SIDEWALK.CC: 6/18/90 Pago 3
0
019 Palm Street (west side)
l Broadway --River Street
Slight settlement of panels at curb. Repair or remove as per
criteria II. B. 2.
020 New Street (east side)
Broadway --3rd Street
Cracks and settlement along boulevard. Repair or remove as
per criteria II. A. 2; and II. B. 2.
021 Washinqton Street (west side)
4th Street --Railroad tracks
One crack and a vertical rise in panels at main walk to
building. Repair or remove as per criteria II. A. 2; and
II. B. 1.
SIDEWALKS NOT ON ACCEPTED PUBLIC SIDEWALK GRID BUT WILL BE PART OF
FUTURE GRID
t 022 3rd Street (south sidel (5-10 year proposal)
Chestnut --Elm
Cracked panels. Suggest repair as per criteria II. A. 2.
123 Washinqton Street (east side) (3-5 year proposal)
No repairs required.
PRIVATE PROPERTY BUT PART OF ACCEPTED GRID
024 Broadway (south side)
Washington --past high school
Cracks and vertical rises at pedestrian ramp at Washington.
Two cracks in sidewalk past school building. Suggest repair
as per criteria II. A. 2; 1I. B. 1, 2; and II. C. 1.
C SIDEWALK.CC: 6/18/90 Page 4
C0
SIDEWALK WHICH IS PART OF THE ACCEPTED PUBLIC SIDEWALK GRID
Part of Streetscape Project
025 Broadway (north side)
Locust --Walnut
Cracked panels at entrance of building. Repair as per
criteria II. A. 2; II. B. 4.
026 Broadway (south side)
Locust --Walnut
No repairs needed.
027 Broadway (north side includinq north radius at Pine)
Walnut --Pine
No repairs needed.
028 Broadway (south side)
Walnut --Pine
No repairs needed.
029 Broadway (north side includinq radius at Pinel
Pine --Cedar
Cracks in panels end driveway. Repair as per criteria
II. A. 2.
030 Broadway (south side)
Pine --Cedar
Spauling .in driveway crack in small (1 -Coot) panel. Repair as
per criteria II. A. 2; II. B. 6; and II. C. 1.
031 Broadway (north aide) (Also see 042)
Coder --Palm (west 1/2 block)
No repairs noodod on west 1/2 of block.
I
SIDEWALK.CC: 6/18/90 Page 5
#32 Broadway (south side)
Cedar --Palm
Trim trees in front of City Hall as per criteria II. A. 3.
#33 3rd Street (north side)
Walnut --Pine
Cracks in panels by driveways. Repair as per criteria
!I. A. 2.
#34 3rd Street (north side) (See also #53)
Pine --Cedar (mid -block, driveway only)
Cracked and settled panel in driveway to commuter lot. Repair
as per criteria II. A. 2; II. B. 2; and II. C. 1.
#35 Walnut Street (west side) (See also #59)
River Street --Broadway
Cracked panels with heaving, settlements at curbs, and
vertical rise between 107 Walnut and 208 River. Repair as per
criteria II. A. 2; II. B. 1, 2, 3; and II. C. 1.
#36 Walnut Street (east side)
River Street --Broadway
No repairs needed.
#37 Walnut Street (west side) (See also #60)
Broadway --3rd (1/4 block from Broadway)
No repairs needed on streetscape.
#38 Walnut Street (east sidel
Broadway --3rd
Cracks (both straight and wandoring), vertical rise. Repair
as per criteria II. A. 2; II. B. 1, 2; II. C. 1.
SIDEWALR.CC: 6/18/90 Pago 6
v
139 Pine Street (west side)
Broadway --3rd (radius at ends of block only)
No repairs needed.
SIDEWALKS ON GRID (NOT ON STREETSCAPE)
140 Broadway (north sidel
Linn --Locust
No pedestrian ramp at Linn, cracked panel at Linn, sidewalk
badly spauled from Linn to driveway to 349 West Broadway, one
crack in eighth panel west of Locust. Repair as per criteria
II. A. 2; II. B. 6; and II. C. 1.
141 Broadway (south side),
Linn --Locust
Both large and small cracks in panels, some settled areas.
Repair as per criteria II. A. 2; II. B. 2, 3, 4; and II. C. 1.
142 Broadway (north sidel (Also see 131)
Cedar --Palm
Sidewalk settled at curb. Some spauling and peeling, cracks,
settlement, and heave of panels. Repair or replace as per
criteria II. A. 2; II. B. 2, 3, 5, 6; II. C. 1.
143 Broadway (south side)
Chestnut --Elm
Small cracks in panels, multiple cracks in panels. Repair as
per criteria II. A. 2; II. B. 1, 4; II. C. 1.
144 Broadway (south side)
Elm --Vino
Driveway broken up at 726 West Broadway. Repair as per
criteria II. B. 3; II. C. 1.
C SIDEWALK.CC: 6/18/90 Pago 7
0
C #45 Broadway (south side)
Vine --Minnesota
No repairs needed.
#46 Broadway (south side)
Minnesota• --Maple
Cracked panel, 1" vertical rise between panels. Repair as per
criteria II. A. 2; and II. B. 1.
#47 Broadway (south side)
Maple --Linn
No repairs needed on sidewalk. Trim trees as per maintenance
criteria II. A. 3.
#48 Broadway (south side)
Palm --New
Tree overhangs at 306 and 336 Broadway, cracks In panels at
306 East Broadway and 201 New Street. No pedestrian ramp at
C New. Repair panels per criteria II. A. 2; and trim trees as
per H. A. 3.
049 Broadway (south side)
New --Wright
No pedestrian ramp at New Street. Settlements and/or water
traps on boulevard side of walk, panel cracked at 426 East
Broadway. No pedestrian ramp at Wright. Repair as per
criteria H. A. 1, 2; and II. B. 2.
050 Broadway (south side)
Wright --Ramsey
No pedestrian ramp at Wright, vertical rise in sidewalk,
cracked and one spaulsd panel at 530 East Broadway. Crack in
panel west of pedestrian ramp on Ramsey. Repair as per
criteria II. A. 2; II. B. 1, 6; II. C. 1.
C SIDEWALK.CC: 6/18/90 Page 8
f51 Broadway (south side)
Ramsey --Hennepin
Cracks in panel around water box and vertical rise in sidewalk
west edge of driveway to 618 East Broadway. Trees need
trimming at 642 East Broadway. Repair and maintain as per
criteria II. A. 2, 3; and II. B. 1.
#52 Broadway (south sidel
Hennepin --Washington
No pedestrian ramp at Hennepin, panel settled and cracked at
724 East Broadway. Repair as per criteria II. A. 1 and 2.
#53 3rd Street (north side) (Also see #34)
Pine --Cedar
Sidewalk below boulevard grade, settlements, and cracks.
Heaved panels from tree roots. Repair as per criteria
II. A. 2; II. B. 1, 4; and II. C. 1.
#54 3rd Street (south side)
Walnut --Pine
Some cracked panels with slight settlement. Repair as per
criteria II. A. 2; II. B. 2, 4; and II. C. 1.
155 4th Street (north side)
Walnut --Pine
Crack in panel east of driveway to bank. Repair as per
criteria II. A. 2.
#56 4th Street (north side)
Pine --Coder
Cracked panels with spauling and settlement of some. Entire
sidewalk past 125 East 4th Street either cracked, heaved, or
settled. Tree overhangs throughout block. Repair, replace,
and maintain as per criteria II. A. 1, 2, 3; II. B. 2, 5, 6;
and II. C. 1.
C SIDEWALK.CC: 6/18/90 Page 9
0
r #57 Maple Street (west side)
Broadway --3rd
Cracked, heaved, settled, grass growing in cracks and between
small panels. Heaving from trees. Sidewalk crowned in middle
with poor drainage at boulevard. No pedestrian ramp at either
end of block. Repair or replace as per criteria II. A. 1, 2;
II. B. 1, 2, 3, 5; and II. C. 1.
#58 Maple Street (west side)
3rd Street --4th Street
No pedestrian ramp at 4th Street. North half of block is
small (2'x2') panels which are cracked, settled, and heaved
with pieces missing and grass growing in cracks. South half
of block has two vertical rises and all cracks with the
exception of settled panel at driveway along north end of
property have been sealed. Misalignment of sidewalks from
north half to south half. Repair or replace as per criteria
II. A. 1, 2, 3; II. B. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; and II. C. 1.
#59 Walnut Street (west side) (Also see #35)
River --Broadway
Cracked panels, settlement along curb and several vertical
rise s. Repair or replace as per criteria II. A. 1, 2;
II. B. 1, 2, 3, 4; and II. C. 1.
#60 Walnut Street (west side) (Also see 037)
Broadway --3rd
Vertical rise in sidewalk by 207 Walnut Street. Panel
sottlement and cracking in small (2'x2') panels past
209 Walnut. Heaving and cracking of panels along the side lot
of 201 West 3rd Street. Repair or replace sidewalk as per
criteria II. A. 1, 2; II. B. 1, 4, 6; and II. C. 1.
061 Walnut Street least side)
3rd Streot--4th Stroot
Vortical rise at southwest building corner and crack with
vortical rise north of driveway to parking lot. Repair as per
criteria I1. A. 2; II. B. 1 and 2.
C SIDEWALK_CC: 6/18/90 Pago 10
0
C 062
Walnut (east side)
4th Street --Railroad tracks
Cracks in sidewalk panels north of library.
Repair cracks as
per maintenance criteria II. A. 2.
063
Pine Street (west side)
River Bridge --River Street
No repairs needed.
064
Pine Street (west side)
River Street --Broadway
Loose chunks north of driveway. Repair
as per criteria
II. B. 3.
065
Pine Street (west side)
Broadway --3rd
No repairs needed.
066
Pine Street (west side)
3rd Street --4th Street
Crack in pedestrian ramp NW corner of 4th
and Pine. Repair
crack as per criteria II. A. 2.
067
Pine Street (west side)
4th Street --Railroad tracks
Curb broken at pedestrian ramp SW corner
of 4th and Pine.
Repair as per criteria II. B. 3.
068
Pine Street (west side)
Railroad tracks --5th Street
No repairs required.
C SIDEWALR.CC: 6/18/90 Page 11
-07
1 #69 Pine Street (west side)
5th Street --6th Street
Sidewalk in good shape but below boulevard grade, possible
water trapping at boulevard. Improve drainage as per criteria
II. A. 1.
#70 Pine Street (west side)
6th Street --7th Street
No repairs needed.
#71 Pine Street (west side)
7th Street --Oakwood Drive
Cracks in panels of sidewalk, center island at mall entrance
and past commuter lot. Repair cracks as per maintenance
criteria II. A. 2.
#72 Pine Street (east side)
River Bridge --River Street
No repairs needed.
#73 Pine Street (east side)
River Street --Broadway
Cracks in panels with two panels spauled and broken up at
curb. Repair as per criteria II. A. 2; II. B. 3, 6; and
II. C. 1.
#74 Pine Street (east side)
Broadway --3rd Street
Cracked panel in alley. Repair as per maintenance criteria
II. A. 2.
#75 Pine Street (east sidol
3rd Stroet--4th Street
No repairs needed.
SIDEWALK.CC: 6/18/90 Page 12
C-7)
076 Pine Street (east side)
4th Street --Railroad tracks
No repairs needed.
077 Pine Street (east side)
Railroad tracks --6th Street
vertical rise at expansion joint at pedestrian ramp northeast
corner of Pine and 6th. Repair or replace as per criteria
II. B. 1, 2.
078 Pine Street (east side)
6th Street--Lauring Lane
Cracks in both pedestrian ramps at Pine and Lauring. Maintain
as per criteria II. A. 2.
079 Pine Street (east side)
Lauring Lane --Oakwood Drive
Crack in panel at cable manhole north of freeway bridge, crack
in pedestrian ramp. Maintain as per criteria II. A. 2.
080 Cedar Street (west side)
Broadway --3rd Street
Panels broken up north of alley radius, slight heaving, some
pieces broken out, cracks in sidewalk panels from alley to
Broadway. Sidewalk good past old fire barn. Repair as per
criteria II. A. 2; II. A. 3, 4, 5; and II. C. 1.
081 Cedar Street (west side)
3rd Street --4th Street
Sidewalk appears to have been ponding water (panels below
boulevard grade) and panels badly heaved at large tree south
of driveway, tree overhangs and tire swing hung over sidewalk
at corner house 3rd and Cedar Small panel sidewalk
heaved, settled, cracked, with woods growing in cracks on
Cedar Street side of 125 East 4th Street property. Sidewalk
broken up and pumped up at driveway for 125 East 4th Street.
Repair or replace as per criteria Il. A. 1, 2, 3;
II. B. 1, 2, 4, 5; and II. C. 1.
l
SIDEWALK.CC: 6/18/90 Pago 13
0
082 Cedar Street (east side)
4th Street --Railroad tracks
Slight settlement at pedestrian ramps at 4th and Cedar, light
spauling in the first 14 panels south of 4th Street, entire
walk slightly below boulevard grade (poor drainage), crack in
sidewalk panel. Repair or replace as per criteria
II. A. 1, 2; II. B. 2, 6; and II. C. 1.
NOTE: There are multiple hairline cracks in the sidewalk areas
(both east and west sides) of freeway bridge deck. MN/DOT
should be informed.
C
SIDEWALR.CC: 6/18/90 Page 14
0
CITY OF MONTICELLO
SIDEWALK INSPECTION CRITERIA
I. DEFINITION
A pedestrian walkway (either bituminous or concrete) is a
smooth, continuous, horizontal plane generally 4 feet to
5 feet wide, parallel to curb or street driving surface In
both boulevard width and vertical height with a cross -slope of
2% to 4% to promote water drainage. It should be free of
hazards to pedestrians, bicyclists, and snow removal equipment
such as, but not limited to, cracks, settlements, protrusions,
both horizontal and vertical such as heaved panels (whole or
partial), tree limbs, and overhangs. There should be
pedestrian ramps where sidewalk meets curb on all new and
major restoration construction.
II. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MAINTENANCE AND CRITERIA FOR REPAIR OR
REPLACEMENT
A. Recommendations for Maintenance
1. Drainaqe
Property owners will be encouraged to maintain
drainage from the sidewalk areas and will be
notified when poor drainage is observed during the
annual inspections.
2. Small Cracks and Holes
Such defects larger than 1/4" but less than 3/4"
will be recommended to be sealed or patched using
approved materials. Thls will Increase the
longevity of the sidewalk.
3. Ovorhanqs and Hazards
Property owners will be asked to correct any
temporary hazards such as signs, mail boxes, tree
branches, or rocks or debris on the sidewalk or In
the path of a pedestrian which could cause a trip,
fall, or head Injury.
CSIDEWALK INSPECTION CRITERIA: 6/7/90 Page I
l
B. Cause for Repair or Replacement
1. Any vertical sharp rise In a sidewalk panel over
1/4" in height which could cause a person to trip
or could catch maintenance equipment shall be cause
for replacement of the panel.
2. Any section of a sidewalk which has settled so as
to collect water shall be replaced or repaired by
jacking (when feasible).
3. Any holes exceeding 3/4" In diameter and any cracks
exceeding 3/4" in width and more than 1/4" deep
shall be repaired using approved materials.
4. Any sidewalk panel having a series of wide cracks
and holes so as to make repairs not practical shall
be replaced.
5. Any sidewalk panels with sharp crowns or heaving
which could cause a trip or fall when the sidewalk
is wet or slippery shall be replaced.
6. Any sidewalk panel that is peeling or spauling so
that loose material is consistently found on the
surface shall be replaced.
C. Replacement of Sidewalk
1. Any sidewalk replaced shall conform to standard
specifications for sidewalk construction as
recommended by the City Engineer.
SIDEWALK INSPECTION CRITERIA: 6/7/90
Page 2
0
�i�rir�,rrnWA�
�t♦,r tit ��r 'r ! �� '�A
IM
:�,. � .; ,�'�'` !t�,�j ��► /� ! � tris �,�� ����. -
.;� u
y 1
�t
�►� �i y��� e i e s
4
�yr� �d�t/t� i����ir;—
"�� . ,� �j ./ !//� fly �. � . -
-� ' .•f �;,� � .c '�,�� �h,(`i' ' tt,If �! r/t�',�►�j��� J/ f/ I `III��,)��j�� ���
i
A �
-� �Ir �� �%� bj�►ip jt�► hitt ' �ii� - j�� :�i ��,� ��
�����= '� ,�� .� tltjr��� yt�j��` �,�, tt� >���////1ff 'JJl////t�.�%�� � � \ .�
� �����,�t '�l�`!t ... � o�j�j�. �� tjltp ���trr ✓iJ� ,/1f�. ,.� �`,�,�e
At,���ttj '�t�1�' '• . r�t�. ��� "�t�d' t��#` ttj!!/r` �Ufi�-1ff�lp,�t. h
�tI� . �d o,. � I tti ,�� p ,r ,�,�, dPtt �� �t //f� : :�1rfl'�'� � .
tit "�'�` �'��tt �I1 t��t�' �t �, � . �o�,,
pry . D �'ttt �' p,� ;. "� '�.. ,,j�� �j,��`'"�.
1p.. � , � �
'"� ,�.
���4�� �j�I♦''fit �.�.t ��. �►:,. �i����.
.��,
t
��
�..—
`'
�' • ' �'
*� �--
�� ��.�_
R,?�
�ry ij'�}'�M"
-�1r r
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
8. Consideration of advertising for bids for annual sealcoating
project. (J.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
This year's sealcoating project is slated for the northwestern
portion of the core city and includes all streets between
Chestnut and Pine Street and Fourth Street and Front Street
except CSAH 39. This area includes approximately 57,307
square yards of street surface. At an estimated cost of
57.2 cents per square yard, this would bring us to $32,780,
slightly over the budgeted amount of ;31,500.
If the bids come in more costly, we would consider doing less
than those streets which are due this year. These streets
were last sealcoated in 1982.
The specifications to be used are the same as in previous
years utilizing the granite chip sealcoat rock with an asphalt
emulsion base. Due to the length of the specifications, they
are not included in the agenda but may be reviewed at City
Hall.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
The first alternative is to authorize advertisement for
bids for approximately 57,307 square yards of sealcoating
as outlined above.
2. The second alternative would be not to authorize the
sealcoating project, modify the type of sealcoat used, or
cut back on streets to be sealcoated.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director and
Street Superintendent that the City Council authorize
advertisement for bids as outlined in alternative O1 to be
reviewed at the July 9 meeting.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
List of street sections; Copy of map indicating the streets to
be sealcoated.
PROJECT SC 90-1
SEALCOATING AND APPURTENANT WORK
June 22. 1990
'
BIT. WDTH I
SEGMT LGTH
LAST
SEGMENT
SEGMENT
STREET NAME
BLK ADDRESS
IN FEET
IN LINEAL FT
SEALCOAT
SO YDS
NW1006
W. RIVER ST.
100
29
384
1982
1237
NW 1008
W. 3RD ST.
100
37
375
1982
1542 I
WALNUT ST.
10
25 1
332
1982
922
INW2001
NW2003
WALNUT ST.
200
41
368
1982
1677 l
1MW2004
WALNUT ST.
300
41
371
1982
1690
INW2006
FRONT ST.
200
21 1,
411
1982
959 I
INW2007
W. RIVER ST.
200
28
414
1982
1288
INW2009
W. 3RD ST,
200
37
414
1982
1702
INW3002
LOCUST ST.
10
26
366
1982
1057
INW3003
LOCUST ST.
100
39
369
1982
1599
INW3004
LOCUST ST.
200
41
369
1982
1681 1
INW3005
LOCUST ST.
300
41 11
373
1982
1700
INW3006
FRONT ST.
300
25
401
1982
1069
INW3007
W. RIVER ST.
300
34
414
1982
1564
INW3009
W. 3RD ST.
300
371
419
1982
1723
INW4002
LINN ST.
0
25
380
1982
1056
NW4003
LINN ST,
100
35
3681982
1431
NW4004
LINN ST.
200
33
368
1982
1349 1
INW4005
LINN ST.
300
33
374
1982
1371
INW4007
W. RIVER ST.
400
34
412
1982
1556 I
W. 3RD ST.
400
37
414
1982
1702 I
INW4009
NW5002
MAPLE ST.
100
36
369
1982
1476
INW5003
MAPLE ST.
200
33'
368
1982
13491
INW5004
MAPLE ST.
300
33
375
1982
1375
INW5006
W. RIVER ST.
500
34
424
1982
16021
INW5008
W. 3RD ST.
500
37
421
1982
1731 I
6002
MINNESOTA ST.
100
33
368
1982
1349 1
6003
MINNESOTA ST.
_ 200
41 1
368
1982
1676 I
6004
l6onq
MINNESOTA ST.
300
34 '
374
1982
1413
W. RIVER ST.
800
34
a21
1982
1590
INW6008
W. 3RD ST.
600
37
425
1982
1747 I
INW7001
VINE ST.
100
34
367
1982
1386 I
VINE ST.
200
33
366
1982
1342 1
INW7002
NW7003
VINE ST.
300
33
374
1982
1371
INW7005
W. RIVER ST.
700
34
413
1982
1560
NW7007
W. 3RD ST.
700
37
391
1982
1607
18371
NW8001
ELM ST.
100
40
388
1982
1556
INW8005
W. RIVER ST.
800
34
412
1982
INW8007
W. 3RD ST.
B00
37
405
1992
1665 1'
TOTAL
57.3071
.-._- -Ile R
\ 1'' \, \�...'^� � • t • �t���Y•j�jfj, �f�{��/f{��'jy�,�fJ��f/{��j�j •.� ` ..
\ 't .. • f� (7`f'j��.(,�j��,'�+ ..Gy Y L(jllillin'!�� '`+'.
../'� • • .•9. \ M ° \ ,� "`til _^Vilji �'^�7 ��
�\w• n\ •U a `.ati ""���"' ...i�� iii? tl � • � �i�"'; .�J,�.
�' a \ °'mac � ° - � •� t )• �� • / • J r . t..
Mv +7
� ... � T ! ' :�-.J •«rte
\.' ANT � Ca � .r"•r�., �' J.. •��'t'y
QRS I
Tq r J
` HIGHWAYNO. 94
/
Al.
\\ NEW ROCK NS
K SO
STO
J
LCCpt PKpJsCt
1990 gEA
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
9. Quarterly department head reports. (R.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Enclosed with this agenda item you will find brief reports
prepared by staff department heads summarizing activities and
informational items that may be of interest to the Council.
I have notified other departments for the City, including
Sheriff Don Hozempa and YMCA Director, Mike Melstad, to also
attend the meeting to report on any activities or answer
questions the Council may have.
The general purpose of this item is to allow Council members
an open forum to discuss or ask any questions you may have of
a specific department head or status report submitted.
No action is needed by the Council other than review and
discussion.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Individual department head reports/summaries.
17
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
Quarterly Department Head Report --City Administrator. (R.W.)
TRANSIENT MERCHANT PERMITS
As you may remember, approximately one month ago, Linda
Johnson of Little Mountain Flowers appeared before the Council
expressing concerns of herself and other business people in
Monticello regarding transient merchants. In light of her
comments, I requested and have recently received copies of
other communities' regulations and ordinances pertaining to
transient merchants, peddlers, etc., and how they regulate
their activities. In briefly reviewing the sample ordinances,
it does appear that the City of Monticello is in line with
what other communities regulate; and even in some cases, we
are very restrictive in the amount of charges we have for
daily fees at $50 per day. I will continue to review the
sample ordinances to see if there are any recommendations that
can be made in regard to modifying our ordinances in the
future.
I have revamped the transient merchant application to provide
for a required signature of a property owner before the
application will be considered at City Hall. It does appear
that if a transient merchant is kept off of City right-of-way
and public property in conducting their activities and are
required to be on private property only, I believe most of the
transient merchant activity will be eliminated, especially
with the cooperation of the business owners along the highly
traveled thoroughfares. Our regulations may be sufficient,
especially in our daily charges, if the business owners band
together to prohibit the use of their property for transient
activities.
UNION CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS
For the past few months, Mr. Mike O'Connor, labor attorney for
the City, has met two or three times with the union
representatives to discuss a now two-year contract to replace
the one that expired April 1, 1990, for our five public works
employees. while we have not reached a final package to
submit to the Council at this point, it does appear that we
are getting closer to reaching an agreement regarding contract
language changes and salary increases, etc. I hope to have a
contract renewal available for the Council to be considered in
the next few weeks for ratification.
is
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
FIRE DEPARTMENT VEHICLE
Fire Chief, Jerry Wein, has informed me that the Monticello
Fire Department has been able to obtain from the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources through their excess property
program a used 1-1/2 ton, 6 x 6, fire fighting vehicle. The
DNR has utilized these six -wheeled vehicles called "Gamma
Goats" for fire fighting purposes in their forestry and
marshland areas, etc. A number of vehicles have been
available for donation to local fire departments on request.
The only stipulation is that the vehicles be painted and
equipped with our own water tanks of approximately 200 gallon
capacity at our expense, and the local fire departments can
utilize the vehicles for our own fire fighting purposes. The
only charge involved is a delivery charge of approximately
$250. If in the future the vehicle needs major repairs or if
for any reason the local fire department does not wish to have
the vehicle anymore, it can be returned to the DNR. Jerry
Wein will be at the Council meeting and can provide additional
information regarding this all -terrain vehicle.
AT 6 T FIBER OPTIC CABLE
As I'm sure most of you are aware, there has been much
publicity recently concerning AT & T's intention of installing
a fiber optic cable from Plymouth to St. Cloud along the I-94
corridor. Their original intent was to install this line
across private property through easements and where necessary
through easements and right-of-ways in municipalities enroute
to St. Cloud. Because of recent publicity concerning property
owners' liability for any damage that could occur to the
cables in the future, AT 6 T has been negotiating with MN/DOT
to obtain the rights to install the cable along the I-94
right-of-way rather than through private easements. When it
seemed almost certain that this was going to occur, the City
was informed that negotiations had fallen apart, and AT b T
was again pursuing the private property route. As of a couple
of days ago, it now appears that negotiations are again being
conducted with MN/DOT, and it is almost certain that an
agreement will be reached with MN/DOT and AT 6 T.
In the meantime, the City has met a couple of times with
representatives of AT 6 T and also with their engineering
firm, Finley Engineering, to discuss possible routes through
City property and right-of-way if it was necessary to avoid
using the I-94 corridor. At this point, the locations through
the City right-of-way have boon reviewed and appear to be
feasible provided the City obtains its normal franchise
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
agreement with AT 6 T, similar to those we already have with
other utility companies such as gas and electric, cable tv,
etc. Hopefully, AT 6 T and MN/DOT will come to an agreement
and utilize I-94 right-of-way and not need to use the City's
street right-of-ways for their cable nor private property
owners.
COMPUTER PRINTOUTS
The City now has been using its financial accounting system
for a number of months utilizing our new software from BRC_
Enclosed with your agenda you will find a summary of the
revenue and expenditures for the general fund of the City
through the month of May. We are currently reviewing the
number of standard forms and summaries that are available on
our financial system, and in the future I hope to have a more
detailed summary of the entire City's operations of revenues
and expenditures on a monthly basis for the Council to review_
It appears that the format I desire will have to be set up
using our Report Writer capabilities; and at this time, the
staff has not had sufficient time to review and set up these
formats.
You will also notice that the list of bills are copies of e3
printout supplied by the software. The format supplied lists
the check numbers in order, along with the vendor and a brief
description concerning each check. At this time, if onechec x
is made out and coded (divided to a number of different
accounts), you will notice that there Is a total check amoun t
listed for that vendor. For your purposes, you may only be
Interested In knowing the total check amount, and the vondo r
and the individual codings are for our purposes on the
financial system.
With our general accounting system up and running
satisfactorily, our attention is now turning toward installing
our payroll system on BRC's software. Cathy and Marlene aro
currently receiving training on the installation of th e
payroll system, and we should shortly be utilizing this system
also. After completion and installation of the payroll
system, our attention will then turn toward converting ou s
sower and water (utility billing) system to our now software.
20
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
Quarterly Department Head Report --Assistant Administrator.
(J.O.)
COMPUTER DEVELOPMENT
Finance System
Cathy Shuman and Marlene Hellman made significant
progress toward successful operation of the finance
system. In fact, the system is on line and working with
City financial data now reconciled to the bank.
Information in the computer is up-to-date as of current
moment. In addition, all budget information is entered
into the computer as well. All checks are now written by
computer when appropriate.
This year we will be able to incorporate the capabilities
of the computer with our budget process, which will
include development of worksheets generated by the budget
with information showing current expenditures through
June 1, 1990. This will help us project year-end
expenses and will assist us in developing budget figures
for next year.
Rick is reviewing the pro -formatted reports available and
will be submitting reports to Council on a regular basis
which outline the City's current financial situation.
Both Cathy and Marlene should be commended for their
successful implementation of the finance system.
In accordance with our schedule for implementation, City
staff is now beginning the implementation of the payroll
system. Cathy and Marlene are receiving training this
week on the payroll system. It is expected that the
payroll system should be operational for the first
payroll or second payroll in July. It is possible that
the fire department will also be included in the payroll
system.
Utility Billing
Wanda has boon receiving some preliminary training on the
now system. Staff will be implementing utility billing
as soon as the payroll system is up and running.
21
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
Word Processinq
It is my understanding that Karen is pleased with the
word processing system and with the operation of the new
printer. In addition, Karen has mastered the Lotus 1-2-3
program and is capable of printing Lotus spreadsheets on
our new printer, which significantly increases
readability of reports. Our next goal is to learn how to
use the laser Jet printer to produce Lotus graphics,
which will allow us to prepare pie charts, bar charts,
etc.
Computer implementation is progressing on schedule despite the
ongoing drain on resources associated with the existing
utility billing system and due to glitches in the recycling
program. It is expected that implementation will stay on
schedule with utility billing implementation occurring in the
fall of 1990. All in all, system implementation has been
successful, and staff efficiency has been enhanced with the
Implementation of this system.
PLANNING AND ZONING ITEMS
Amendments to the Parkinq Lot Desiqn Requirements
City consultants and staff are now responding to the
draft ordinance. This item will be on the next Planning
Commission agenda and will be reviewed by Council at the
first meeting in July.
Garaqe Requirement
City staff has talked to a number of communities
regarding garage requirements. This survey will soon be
presented to Council with alternatives for development of
an ordinance amendment which would require that each
single family home constructed would also need a garage.
This item will likely be placed on the August agenda of
the Planning Commission.
Preliminary Plat Mini -Point
Stuart Hoglund has submitted a preliminary plat for
review by the Planning Commission at their regular
meeting in July. The plat encompasses the present
Comfort Inn site, which is 3.5 acres in size.
22
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
Monticello Theatre Development
Wright County State Bank has submitted a site plan for
development of the Monticello Theatre parking area. The
design of the parking lot requires a slight variance to
the side yard setbacks. This issue will be addressed by
the Planning Commission in July and also by the Council
if necessary.
Conditional Use Permit Review
Diane Seifert, Administrative Intern, has been gathering
information regarding each conditional use permit issued
in the city since 1979. This information will be used by
staff as we review each business that has received a
conditional use permit for the purpose of monitoring
compliance with conditions. City staff will be preparing
a report to Council which outlines adherence to
conditions and will be requesting further guidance from
Council regarding enforcement.
Subway Shop
A few problems cropped up regarding development of
the Subway Shop next to Tom Thumb, which appear to
have been resolved by the property owners working
with City staff and local attorneys. Proper
easements were not in place which would allow the
Subway Shop to gain access to Highway 25 across
private property. Easements are now in place.
Drainage of the site requires some grading of the
Highway 25 ditch right-of-way. It appears that
approvals from the State are close at hand.
INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND STRATEGY
It is hoped that within the next few weeks 1 will be able
to draft a basic outline of the issues that the
Industrial Development Committee is concerned about
regarding developing strategies for industrial land
development. This outline would be approved by Council
and then submitted to the planner for review and comment.
With his comments, John Uban would also provide the City
with an estimate of tho cost associated with assisting
Cho City in developing a plan for industrial land.
BROCHURE DEVELOPMENT
Thursday, Juno 21, Jeff and 011ie reviowod the key lino for
the information brochure. If the key line is approved, then
the brochure is ready for printing.
23
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
K -MART DEVELOPMENT
The K -Mart project appears to be on schedule. The plat is not
recorded pending resolution of the ponding easement area
issue.
TRAM 250 UPDATE
KMSP TV did a very nice summary of City activity associated
with the TRAM 250. The community was portrayed in a very
positive light by the video. I hope everyone got a chance to
see it. If not, I have a tape of the two -minute program. If
you would like to watch it, please let me know.
Since the last TRAM 250 update, a couple of things have
occurred. The Bald Eagle Water Ski Show has committed to
providing an hour show from 7:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. In
addition, Wright County Historian, Mrs. Jameson, has
volunteered to provide her knowledge of the history of the
community via one hour bus tours to be conducted on the hour
starting at 1:00 P.M. the day of the TRAM 250. The cost of
the tour will be $1.00, with $.50 going to the Heartland
Express and the remainder to the Wright County Historical
Society. Diane Seifert is doing a good job in coordinating
the TRAM 250 event. As part of her duties, Seifert has worked
with the Monticello Times toward development of a readable map
of the city which will be used by the TRAM 250 riders. This
map will be very useful for other purposes in the future.
TORCH RUN
The Olympic Torch is coming through town on June 30, 1990.
Diane Seifert has been successfully handling the
responsibility of organizing and coordinating the event.
Please see the attached information packet regarding the Torch
Run which Diane prepared and distributed to the torch runners.
MONTICELLO HEARTLAND EXPRESS
The Monticello Heartland Express continues to grow in usage.
At least throe times this month, ridership has excooded 100
rides per day, with 120 rides per day established as our new
record high. The average for the month to this date is around
65 ridos per day. At the first or second meeting in July, I
will be submitting a revised management plan and application
for state funding to Council for review. Along with that,
Council will be asked to consider purchase of a bus.
24
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
COMPARABLE WORTH PLAN
As you may recall, Council directed staff to prepare a
comparable worth plan for the purpose of studying the relative
worth of the new positions recently created. These positions
include the receptionist position and the computer/ finance
support position now fulfilled by Cathy Shuman.
Unfortunately, we've not made much progress on this project.
We have submitted a request for Lotus software which would
allow the City to computerize its comparable worth scoring.
This software was free of charge. As soon as the software
arrives, we will be reviewing it and determining whether or
not we would want to incorporate the use of this software in
development of the City's comparable worth plan.
THE EVERGREENS DEVELOPMENT
I have been informed by Kent Kjellberg that the Evergreens
development is back on track with Gardner Brothers being near
acquisition of the property. If Gardner Brothers does truly
take over the project, they will complete it as a private
project and will follow the terms of the development agreement
originally established between the City of Monticello and Kent
Kjellberg. As soon as Gardner Brothers confirms information
provided by Kjellberg, City staff will be reviewing
development agreements, covenants, etc., to make sure that the
agreements in place with Kjellberg apply to Gardner Brothers
as well.
25
250 East Broadway
\lunticellu, \1N 55362.9245
Phone: (612) 295-2711
\levo: (612) 333.5739
Welcome Torchbearer!
June 20, 1990
Once again I would like to congratulate you for being chosen as one
of the 8,000 runners selected for the honor of carrying the 1990
Olympic Festival Torch. Many activities have been planned to help
make this an exciting event for you. I have organized this
information packet to cover these activities and more. Hopefully
this information will be able to answer any questions you may have
regarding the Olympic Torch Run. However, if you still have
questions after reading this packet, please feel free to ask.
Our meeting agenda for the evening will cover many of the items
enclosed in this informational handout, along with a few additional
comments. The agenda will consist of:
I. Introductions.
II. Distribution of the information packets.
III. Assignment of the individual runner's location.
IV. Maps of the torchbearer's route through the city of
Monticello.
V. Special events.
VI. Torch Run Day.
A. Registration.
B. Distribution of t -shirts.
VII. Torchbearer's procedures.
VIII. Questions will be answered.
I have really enjoyed planning and working with the many people
involved with the 1990 Olympic Festival Torch Run. I hope the
experience of the Torch Run can be as rewarding to you as it has
been for me.
See you on Torch Run Day
Diane Seifert
Administrative Intern
C
RI
se�°o Deo
n
City of
.t..�.: 011t1cello
tilutizicrtLo Pinewood Elementary/ C) Downtown Business Dist.
bmf Course Roaa
Pinewood Playground
Monticello Mali G City Hall
Post Office C) Ellison Park
Q Public Library 0 High School
kA -9 C) Bridge Park Hospital/Nursing Home
TO
Big lake
N
.0—
Mpis.
G akwood
Industrial
Park
Torch Run Route — — -- — —p
1. '�
3HWAY
U.S. Olympic Fess.ral-'90
Torch Run Route
City of Monticello
XAF
s ♦o r�
i
34ft
j•
tTo�
,0-11:
iR}� Schnui - - O
iilYYY �
SPECIAL EVENTS
Several events will be occurring in Monticello on the day of the
Torch Run (June 30th). You, as well as your family and friends,
are encouraged to attend these special activities to provide for a
day of entertainment you're sure to remember:
9:00 am - 4:00 pm Downtown Art Fair on Broadway Street.
Displayed along the sidewalks, approximately forty booths will
be featuring such items as wood carvings, paintings, pottery,
crafts, and more. Food booths will be provided by "Monticello
Youth Hockey" and the "Women of Today" organizations.
10:45 am - 11:00 am (approx.) Olympic Festival Torch Run begins
in West Bridge Park. Preceding the torchbearer in the Torch
Run will be Wright County Sheriff, Don Hozempa, followed by
our local Fire Chief, Jerry Wein.
10:55 am - 11:10 am (approx.) The torch will arrive downtown by
torchbearer and local business owner, Alan Loch, for a brief
display on the corners of Broadway and Highway 25. If time
allows, this will present a good opportunity for family and
friends to have their picture taken with the Olympic Festival
Torch.
11:20 am - 11:35 am (approx.) The torch will arrive at the
Monticello High School track by local High School track star,
Jennifer Brevick. A small ceremony will be held as the
Olympic Festival Torch is used to light a torch for the
afternoon's "Monticello All Comers Track Meet".
11:40 am - 11:55 am (approx.) The torch will arrive at the
McDonald's Restaurant and be greeted with a celebration in
honor of the Olympic Torch Run. Included in the celebration
will be: Monticello Mayor, Ken Maus; Miss Monticello, Carey
Temberton, and her Princesses; The Monticello Middle School
Marching Band; and Ronald McDonald. McDonald's has scheduled
several activities from 11:00 am to 12:00 pm. Included in
these activities are: visits with Ronald McDonald for the
children, a His and Her Children's Bike Raffle, gifts and
prizes to be given away, and music provided by the Monticello
Middle School Marching Band.
••Special Note --
--McDonald's will be providing a free lunch after the Torch Run
to all torchbearers who are wearing their "Olympic Torch
Run" t -shirt. At this time, the Monticello Times would
C
like to take a group photograph of the torchbearers who
participated in the Monticello Torch Run. This photograph
will be available to the torchbearers for the price of:
$4.25 for a 5 x 7 photograph
$7.75 for a 8 x 10 photograph
If you are interested in an Olympic Torch Run group
photograph, please bring the necessary funds with you to the
lunch at McDonald's. The Monticello Times will be collecting
the fee for the photographs at the time the pictures are
taken.
1:00 pm The "Monticello All Comers Track Meet" begins. This is
a free track meet sponsored by Community Education and is
open to individuals of all ages. The track meet will be
held at the Senior High School track with registration
beginning at 12:30 pm and the first event scheduled to
begin at 1:00 pm. For more information, please contact
the Community Education office at 295-2915.
3:00 pm The Chamber of Commerce will be sponsoring a 9 -Hole,
Three -Person Scramble Golf Tournament at the Monticello
Country Club. The golf tournament is scheduled to begin
at 3:00 pm. For more information regarding fees and
registration, please contact the Monticello Country Club
at 295 -GOLF.
TORCH RUN DAY
(June 30, 1990)
Registration: Each torchbearer needs to register between 9:00 am
and 10:15 am at City Hall on the morning of the Torch Run. This is
to make sure that everyone is accounted for and to answer any last
minute questions you may have. Also if any last minute changes
need to be made, you will be informed of them at this time.
The City of Monticello will be providing coffee, orange juice, and
rolls to the torchbearers during the registration time.
••Torchbearers should start positioning themselves at their
location by 10:30 am in order to be in place by the time the Torch
Run begins. Since there is no definite time that the Olympic
Festival Torch will arrive, the Torch Run will begin as soon as we
receive the torch.
Distribution of T -Shirts: The "Olympic Torch Run" t -shirt will be
distributed to each torchbearer during registration on the morning
of the Torch Run. The t -shirt must be worn during the Torch Run
event. Restrooms in City Hall will be open to the torchbearers if
they should need a place to change into the t -shirt.
HAVE A GREAT TIME!!!!!!!
C
U
TORCHBEARER PROCEDURES
-- Remember to be in your position on time to receive the handoff
of the torch. If a runner is not present to receive the
torch, the person carrying the torch should continue on to the
next torchbearer. This is necessary since our time is
limited.
-- Torchbearers are required to wear their "Olympic Torch Run"
t -shirt during the Torch Run event.
-- Torchbearers should run on the right side of the street and
should not diagonally cross the street when turning corners.
-- Please remember to practice safety while waiting for the torch
to arrive at your position. Wait on the corner or sidewalk
until you see the torchbearer approaching. Do not wait on the
street.
-- The weight of the Olympic Torch is approximately 3 lbs. This
weight should not present a difficulty for any of the
torchbearers; however, if a problem were to occur, the Olympic
Torch Run Caravans will be close by to offer assistance.
-- The arrangement for the Torch Run procession will be as
follows:
1st) Wright County Sheriff, Don Hozempa
2nd) Fire Chief, Jerry Wein
-*3rd) Torchbearer
4th) Torch Run Caravans
Please follow this order while you line-up or receive the
handoff of the torch during the Torch Run.
J
J
h/01/90
I.11f L19TIN0 OP
Pl1NNEND
Pe9e 110
Iln.
fl®
]1p 1
L-igem0
M M61...
•-------------------------------
CITY
--------------------
0l Zip
-- ------
1- 0-Vul.
------------
PRONG 1.0
------------ •.
Lm nue LIB aLlq
._ __. ._- .-..
----
CNeeunityl
------
--------------------
MUIITICELLO
---------------
1070
15167
ADAMS
JNIII
7615 MEAIfOV OM I.AI36
IIONTICB[.
IIM
51167
61)-195-1177
1
1879
!l 161
AllAM9
WILLIE
7615 MEAOON OFR LAMB
fORrI Cfi LIA
MII
55167
61]-79]-1177
i
3610
55 J62
AOFINH
OLT'T
1655RADLER AVB. NB
Be? MICUARL
IIR
15176
617-191.7661
617.196-5901 A
i
1011
5S367
AI,BI RO
EIIR1n
P P 1, OOi 715
11DITf1 CumMN
]]187
017-]0]-1188
i
1017
51367
OECFI:R
AND REV
J 6001 N OROAIMIAY AIT 106
CR70TAL
IIN
]]I1:
617-!11-19)1
617.191-)001
1
1611
55167
CR 1.
T10P
BOR 601
1101111 CLI.IA
MP
15107
61]-]85.1119
61 ]-785-3111
A
1611
SS 167
CIINIHTIANOON
AN0 9
DDi /1
OII.VER rPRER
11N
15,1:0
617-61-1111
+
IRIS
$536)
FLICK EP
NA
Dox 155
w ICRLIA
11N
55167
617-810-7010
611-783-5117
■
1916
1116]
-I1 TN
ARN1
RT 7 001 711
oUEPALO
101
1]111
bIT-Ol:•7016
+
1611
55167
OUENT:.
ANT
IIT 7 BnM 717
DUrrAIA
WI
]5111
617-.1:•]016
F
IR IB
]516]
Hll{PTIN
JUB
PT ] Do. 711
81117■IA
MN
]5 111
617-.16.7016
1
IF 19
]]16]
ORCMTIN
1UI.HI LYNN
NT 7 M1 711
RUI'1'Alu
NP
51111
61]-010-]016
A
1160
55161
1NNRE
NATT
NT 1 00A 964
MORTIC[LIA
NO
55167
000.070-2569
000.795-1080
+
1.11
55161
'L'LL"
R1:IIECf.
100 OAAvl EM CI DCI.'
MntIT ICELIA
M
55167
61]•795.5'61
■
1611
1]167
LtE
TIM
655 IJELI.O I:RO': P.F.
KINTI CEI.IA
1111
]5147
000•]85.5111
■
1011
71367
1.1:11P AE
NIRR
T. 1 DOL 111
CLEARWATER
nM
55120
000.550.60x6
A
1611
1.11
Be..
5516)
SSJ67
5336)
1.(1:11
1'II
LUIIUAJUIOT
ALAN
NANCE
JUMATIIAN
J 110 Y 8Pf1A13VAY
PDUTC 1. OD■ IUO.
100 LAIIRI NO I.ANR 1 001
MONTI C[I.IA
KWTI C[IIA
66➢ftI CLL1A
1111
NN
MN
55162
15167
5]167
417•:16-7.05
617.0/0.7811
61)-]81.1111
61)-785-1111
A
A
A
1.11
!]16]
IUTANB
Fl1.E
607 FALLON AVI'NU[
MON7I CELI A
IIN
]5367
617.78]-7611
■
Be,.
1516]
11AIA11B
V11.I.IW
60) 1'AI.IAN AVI:RUB
19 WT ICELIA
MN
]516.1
61 ]•701.7b 11
617-571-6060
■
IRI'
SS J6T
IlINN10
JNIN
11! NEVIN 1ANOLP.1 DRIVE
MUNTICELIA
MN
1510]
017•]81-10.1
61)-11]-11]0
A
1.50
5516)
DD1.11N11
A011'RW
PP 1
CLCAPWATER
MR
51170
000.816.71]6
R
1.11
-66d67
-R IOOIMIAT-
'NNMIiYR
BUi 17f
- CELIA
NN
15167
000•]61.160!
A
IeST
1516)
6AOI:R
NO1.1.1
1)0 B OPIUDVAl
16T1TICELI.O
1W
15167
000.78! -]IBI
............
1
IaSI
!1161
0f11111:1'LLBp
.UNNI■
601 E.:T RIVCR 0T
werl CBLIA
BOB
5516]
011.70]•16:6
617.780-101[
■
1.11
1111)
BIC1111AR8
6CITT
101 III I�LCYreT RD
M]11T1 CI'I,IA
IP
]l 161
617-]8!-1]76
■
IB51
!]167
ef11YAP6
/TEVI:
101 UI LLCR[0T PD.
KWTIC[LID
IIN
6]167
617.781-1]76
i
IOS6
l51b)
e1.UDNAI1
NBIOI
M P O 0U1 1711
MONrIC[LLO
MN
!1167
017-787.7167
R
Bell
5]161
OVIVAR
WART
1601 It RI V►R IT
11DiT1 C[LLD
101
]0707
el)•7x]•1771
617.78]-DIl1
A
I.S6
51167
V1111p
RUPT
78110 10IRD
010 LARD
MN
]]108
017-703.11]1
017.761.3171
1
1010
13167
VAI.TEP:
OTIME
10166 N W 11
010 LAA[
MN
]510:
617-761.1167
617.761-)110
A
1000
5516)
WEITOEMPIT
CAIWI
R 1]011 DAR CPBHT OR
010 1AXII
101
6130:
617.761.101!
L
Mc And rev
.Toff
101 W. EnRlo I.nke Dr.
Mnplo Grove
MN
55769
ItrevIk
.lDow Ifer
5 Runker Circle
Mont.1collo
MN
55762
11• L'nunl
Nf WUNne1R
fn1 11]1117 ICELLO
Torch trek
Festival's runners carry it
with verve and diversity
don? Avow 0 -cut make special
26. carried the flame and spirit of the
rrvursrs, hat I mane to ask. dfv 16.
U.S. Olympic Festival as it weaved
rrar•ald daughter Lra.4nn hada
its wav through the campus of St.
+I'.
1umnow transplant on 0elaher,
01 ecillege.
N.rIMv.... She is now recorerigg
and rhe transplant oras successful. She
"This is her run for victory." said
really moms to participate in Ar
Nancy Baldwin.
run. She (erb this would he a real
6-mrr fir herselland a// leukemia
Actually. Lea Ann Baldwin walked.
panrm}. It is aiiraa rkg that she is still
accompanied by her I8 -year-old
uhie and able to run ... "
sister. L.oralea. The caravan come to
a crawl, allowing the Lonsdale
B� Rob Ilotakalnen
teenager to make it three blocks
Stall Writer
without tiring.
Nnrthfleld. Minn.
" I get tired real Quick." the said. but
Nancy llaldwin's wish came true
TueAas. Her daughter. Runner No,
Torch continued on page 12A
C
12Aw
Torch
Continued from paste IA
`N'ecrescar .t,re :' -' Star Tribune
she wasn't complaining She held the
torch high. -I lust feel that it's kind
of special. I felt honored."
ail across \4nnesma this 24tneh
torch is creating special feelings, at
least for the 3.000 runners who each
paid a S 15 «gislmucn fee after being
randomly chosen by a computer..
"The torch represents the human
spirt." said Basil Janavaras. He ran
the torch as pan of the 1960 Summer
Olympic Games in Rome and will do
it in Mankato again today, when the
laafay. 1.900 -mile run hits its
hallway point.
"It's once in a lifetime — now twice
— to carry that torch." said
lanovaras. a%. a professor in
international business at Mankato
State C'mvernq. "It's a groat event."
It's a creative onc. too. The torch has
been tamed by canoe across the
headwaters of the Mississippi River.
by tractor in Willmar. by
snowmobile in Thief River Falls. It
has been earned by horse, by ice
skates. by rollerblades, by Jet ski. by
snowplow. by train engine, by cow.
by limousine, by flow• by golf can,
by fire truck, by ambulance.
Jew Nyland, of Menahga, asked
permission to run the torch with his
Iamb. Frankie, in Bemidji. 'It was a
real neat feeling when they said 1
could run with the lamb." he said.
"But 1 ended up running with my
daughter." What happened to
Frankie"He wasn't quite responsive
enough to stay nest to me."
Ida Quasi. a Iglyearold woman
who ht -es in a Detroit Lakes nursing
home, tamed it by wheelchair. The
oldest woman to carry the torch, she
was pushed in her chair by two of her
rJeat.grandchildren.
"Oh. I had a good tame." said Quasi.
-It was an honor. I guess you'd call
it." Her granddaughter, Debbie
Forbes• said that Quasi suffered a
letdown offer passing the century
mark on len I, but that the torch
run provided some esntement.
"After you're 100. the things you
have to look forward to are few and
lar between." Forbes said.
The torch is making its way through
105 Mmne om cities and will begin
winding its way throw the suburbs
of the Twin Gua on line 30. Its
final stop will be in Minneapolis July
b when a "mystery runner" will
carr it into the Metrrdome during
Staff Photo by Brian Petersen
Bone marrow recipient Loo Ann Baldwin. 16, carried the Olympic Festi-
val torch Tuesday on the St. Olaf Colleso campus in Northfield.
the festival's opening:crcmrm ki
the Metrodome. the wr.h +rl be
used to light a calui in !hat will he
nearly 30 feet hign .tanirg •.'.c
day festivai
It has alreads bec•i ,cad i_ tar'nc
torch -run crw w1`..h'1.1+n
trarehng sin.; 1Unt' t It
be in — w here ar; +r' —
Northflcld." manag^ Dein s 1 alf
said yesterday as he "rgan :cauing
the caravan through .c• ani ir.:r.w.
The group includes .tad mrmhcrs
and volunteers of the l hiL'•.mp:.
Festival. a Red CNA -1 vch:L:c and !wo
units of the Stale Parr. I hILI Jr
providing wcunty %k .11:e W.n One a
big luny auv whu n'hc ,lr,ial
mavcot m the icsoval :nicniin% the
spectators by danL•rg atop .j
num. an
All the hoopla hrZin June : when
two torches for the''IvmpiL I-ryuval
were lis atop Pike v Prat near
Colorado Springs hr me .1 the b' S
01%mpie Cammdtee The torches
were fluun to Duluth idr the ometal
he;inning of the run Festival
onanitcrs rec;ncd'1 Kph:
ar¢hcahuns:ream I' :i 0 people who
wanted to run the usrch The .0"
•.rnrrs. hi;w•n .nvlude more than
a•i wno:tse in I l Diner Hates
Tke pnrc for persistence goes to
\.kki Gallagher I t of Elk Riser.
w ho applied 3-5 limes Baldwin. one
of 16 runners who hctped the torch
mivc its war through Northfield
vc.tcrdav improv cd her odds by
arching 13 oma
ss Baldwin walked with the torch,
her father uas huvr shooting
rni lographs w an event to
rc-nem. her rcr this family, it was an
e•rauanai moment
"fo reavh this spm :s a real miracle."
,Name, Baldwin said
G�o
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
quarterly Department Head Report --Public Works Department.
(J.S.)
REFUSE AND RECYCLING
Garbage contract with Corrow:
City staff has met with Corrow Sanitation to discuss our
existing contract, as Corrow is currently hauling 1/4
less garbage due to our recycling efforts. Corrow was
unwilling to negotiate. They would not go below $7.50
per month for twice weekly pickup for single family
homes. They would drop their price $1.00 per home per
month to go to once per week pickup. This is only half
the savings we had at the time of the bid opening and
does not appear to be enough of a savings to switch to
once per week pickup with Corrow. These figures do not
include the cost of landfilling but are transportation
only and total about $145,000 annually.
Since our last meeting with Corrow, bids in some areas of
the county have been coming in more competitive,
especially from contractors using more modernized
equipment and semi -automated to automated pickup with
containers. Corrow has now Indicated a willingness to at
least look at their figures again. In addition, the City
is still investigating the possibility of rebidding doing
the garbage pickup ourselves and/or a joint venture with
the City of Buffalo. We have every indication that
anyone of these three alternatives would be more
economical than continuing our contract with Corrow. We
hope to have further information sometime in July for
formal Council action.
Recycling:
Recycling in Monticello has continued to be a success.
As of June 1, we have recycled in excess of 510 tons of
glass, cans, newspaper, and cardboard. This continues to
be about 1/4 of our overall garbage generation rate for
residential property In the city of Monticello. Our
participation rate remains in the high 70's, and
approximately 2/1 of the individuals who did not rocycle
the last quarter of 1989 did so in the first quarter of
1990.
26
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
With the Council action at the last meeting to approve a
pilot recycling program, the recycling committee and City
staff will be detailing plans to begin the program
sometime in July. A detailed summary will be provided at
the end of the second quarter.
Yard Waste Composting:
We have built a compost bar screen for one of the dump
trucks, and it appears to work satisfactorily. We have
placed a pile a compost at the maintenance building and
put a notice in the paper that it is free to City
residents. The pile has dwindled, and it looks like we
will be bringing some additional finished compost in in
the near future.
We have acquired the help of some community service
workers to assist in some bag and plastic removal at the
site. In addition, we have placed some fence screening
near the Daryl Tindle residence and will be replanting
some trees along the front and westerly sides. Summer
hours for the facility are 1:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. on
Wednesday and 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Saturdays. We
are currently contemplating having the facility open on
Monday afternoons also along with some signing indicating
the hours.
4. Tree Program:
1. Brush Chipper: Because the City's brush chipper is
outdated and will not chip any dry brush or
slightly dirty material without causing damage to
the machine, we are continuing to look at machines
for purchasing next year. With the exclusion of
yard waste from landfills and our inability to
handle any dry or dirty brush, it leaves a problem
for the homeowners wishing to dispose of small
amounts of material. We will continue to work on
this and hopefully have some suggestions for the
Council during the budgeting process.
2. Boulevard Trees: Trimming of boulevard trees has
not yet been completed. I expect that this work
will be done in the near future.
Several of the strootecape locust trees have passed
away. The City is currently obtaining quotes from
contractors for their replacement.
27
C
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
3. Boulevard Stumps: City staff is currently involved
in counting and measuring boulevard stumps within
the city. As discussed with the Council during the
budgeting sessions in 1989, City staff would like
to see a program to get the stumps removed from
city boulevards. It has been suggested by one of
the Council members that the City cover the cost of
the stump removal, but the homeowner would have the
option to perform the boulevard restoration or pay
for boulevard restoration after stump removal.
STREETS
1. Inventory:
The Public Works Department is continuing to work on our
street and sign inventory utilizing the Wang PC and
Paradox program. Most sign replacement will be done
during the summer.
2. Sealcoating:
City staff is currently developing plans and
specifications for the 1990 sealcoating project. This
project will involve the area west of Highway 25 north of
the railroad tracks in the core city. Authorization to
advertise will be requested at the last meeting in June
or the first meeting in July.
3. Signal for Intersection at Co. Rd. 75 and Co. Rd. 39:
The Wright County Highway Department continues to perform
traffic studies at the above -referenced intersection in
hope of meeting warrants for the Spring of 1991
construction. Estimated cost for the City is in the
neighborhood of $35,000.
4. Sidewalk:
The City's first comprehensive sidewalk inspection is
underway. It is expected that the report will be
presented to the City Council at the Juno 25 meeting.
26
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
Snop and Garage:
Yard Cleanup: Yard cleanup has begun, and the
staff is currently planning relocation of the
existing NSP fencing to better suit the needs of
the public works department. Immediate plans are
to place screening along the west side of the
property and do some minor blacktopping and
landscaping in the front and easterly portions of
the old NSP building.
Consignment Sale: At the consensus of the City
Council, City staff will be contacting some
auctioneers to organize and hold a one-time
consignment auction on the public works property
probably sometime in July. A list or description
of the types of materials to be offered at the sale
will be provided to the City Council prior to the
auction.
6. Pickup:
It has become apparent again that the City Public Works
Department is short at least one pickup for
transportation and small projects during the summer.
This need is most apparent when the Public Works
Department grows by seven individuals with the addition
of seasonal and temporary employees (this does not
include community service workers). Staff is continuing
to work on this problem and will have a recommendation
for the City Council in the near future.
PARK AND CEMETERY
Restroom and Community Building for West Bridge Park:
Plans for year-round restrooms at West Bridge Park, along
with the foundation for a future community building, are
currently on hold. Approximately half of the money
budgeted for this expenditure for 1990 will be used for
the shelter in Ellison Park. The staff would like some
direction from the City Council in regard to continuing
efforts for development of the rostrooms and foundation
for the community building.
29
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
Ellison Park Picnic Shelter:
The building structure itself is complete with the
exception of anchor bolts and the replacement of a couple
of bottom plates. It is expected that the exterior
concrete work around the building and wiring will be
completed by the 22nd of June. The moisture content of
the wood structure itself is such that chemical sealing
of the wood may not take place until late June or early
July. As always, the Lions came out in full force and
ought to be commended for their efforts toward
construction of the shelter. As of this time, we have
not yet heard the amount of their cash contribution
toward the building.
Cemetery:
With the assistance of a part-time minimum wage
individual, we have entered some of the Hillside Cemetery
registration information Into the computer. The computer
program appears to have a couple of small bugs in it,
which Jack Shelton will be working out in the near
future. Staff is continuing to work toward
beautification of the cemetery as well and is looking at
costs of fencing or shrubbery and will be installing an
outlet for Christmas tree lights in one of the large
evergreens for the upcoming winter.
WATER DEPARTMENT
Water Pressure:
The new tank was filled to capacity on Friday, June 8,
1990. The level of the tank was maintained within the
top four feet until June 15. On June 15, the controls
were sot for a fluctuation of 12 feet.
At this time, we still have at least 100 free pressure
reducing valves to be claimed by residents with homes
older than 1965. We have placod additional notices in
the paper explaining again the use of the valve.
City staff has talked with two of the local plumbers,
Bruce Wachter and Keith Kjollberg. Keith has Indicated
he has had a few calls with wator softener fittings and
dishwashor fittings or valves leaking and has had one
case whore an old hose ruptured leading to a washing
C machine. In addition, he has replaced a few toilet bowl
chocks and repaired some faucet leaks. Bruce Wachter, on
the other hand, has only had ono call related to the
30
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
increased pressure, which was a water softener hose
problem that was not properly tied down. We have not had
any problems with the city mains as of yet, and City
staff is continuing to monitor.
2. Booster Station Refurbishment:
The four pumps for the reservoir have been rebuilt.
During startup, it was noticed that the new 40 hp G.E.
motors were vibrating and were out of balance. G.E. is
rebuilding the units and rebalancing them at a local
factory authorized service shop in Minneapolis. The City
and its engineer are working with G.E. and E.H. Renner s
Sons to obtain new replacement motors or credits due to
the existing motors having to be remanufactured.
3. Well M2:
The installation of the motor in well 02 has been
completed. The pump appears to be working
satisfactorily. The pump produces near 1,000 gallons per
minute at the high end, and the 75 hp motor transferred
from well 01 appears to be working at less than its rated
capacity. We have developed, however, a slight heating
problem in the motor and are looking at the cause. It is
possible we need more air flow through the pump house
Itself for cooling of the motor, or it is possible that
the pump motor was damaged when it was overloaded on well
01.
IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
The Meadows:
Redstone Construction has completed all of the utility
work for the Meadows. The project went quite smoothly.
We are awaiting completion of the curbing by Redstone
Construction and placement of the street base and
surfacing by Bauorly Brothors Construction. It is
expectod that the project will moot its completion date
in early August.
7th and Minnesota Street Project:
The 7th and Minnosota Street project is getting off to a
Blow start. R.L. Larson Excavating Is expected to begin
work on the piping portion of the project around the 21st
or 22nd of June. The City engineer is working out
details on the retaining walls with R.L. Larson's
subcontractor, Month Sod and Landscaping, to do the
31
C
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
retaining walls. At this point in time, we have no
reason to believe the project will not be completed on
time; however, it is most likely that it will be bumping
the completion date of August 15.
SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM
1. Copper and Zinc in Our Wastewater:
City staff has not performed any additional investigative
work at this time to determine where the small amounts of
copper and zinc are entering our wastewater system. This
investigation will more than likely take place during the
summer months.
Odor Control System:
The odor control pilot system, which consists of
injection of ferric chloride into our wastewater
collection system near Sunny Fresh Foods, has been
operating for the past month-and-a-half. During this
period of time, we have had no complaints of odor from
residents in and about the wastewater treatment plant
even though small amounts of odors were generated within
the plant itself due to operation. City staff is hopeful
that this pilot system will operate effectively and we
will be able to consider this a more permanent solution.
32
C
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
9. Quarterly Department Head Report --Economic Development Director.
(O.K.)
PROSPECT REPORT
Remmele Engineering:
Plans are on the way for ground breaking by Vice President
Mike Pudil and myself.
Development Agreement --negotiated.
Final Plat --approved but not recorded.
Vacated Fallon Avenue and established drainage/utility
easements --approved but not recorded.
Slope easement --in process.
Purchase of 68.5 acres --certificate of legal description --in
process.
Building/site plana --approved.
Release from Franklin Sign Co. --in process.
Arizona Bankruptcy Court approved Boyle land purchase option.
Genereux Fine Wood Products:
Development Agreement --negotiated.
Bldg/site plans --approved (landscaping request to plant
prairie grass is being reviewed).
SBA Loan --the SBA would not accept the terms of a portion of
the GMEF because any CDC's injection must not be repaid at any
faster rate than the SBA repayment. Therefore, we are
increasing the TIF budget by $12,000 (increment is sufficient)
and reducing the GMEF fund by $12,000 (loan now $88,000).
This will satisty SBA, comply with our GMEF guidelines, and
reduce the amount of our loan. The facility will be of blue
glass and concrete. GMEF loan documents have been prepared by
City Attorney, Tom Hayes, who will also attend the closing.
The Tire Service Manufacturing Company:
Closing on the Larson building will take place when the
abstract update is completed. The company plans to relocate
to Monticello the second or third week of July. His financing
has been completed through private and conventional dollars.
He expects to hire 8-10 unskilled employees within the first
year.
Old Best -In -Webb Building:
Off the market, sale is pending.
33
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
Cargill Feed Mill:
The IDC Recruitment Committee visited Gold'n Plump at Sauk
Rapids to make an on -hands observation of the feed mill
operation. The group made note of the limited amount of hard
surface, no curbing, and high amount of truck traffic. The
company is closing their Belgrade, Minnesota, operation and
will be constructing a 100-150 foot concrete elevator in the
year 1991. Availability of rail is a must for future
operations. This limits Monticello to the Hoglund property,
which would require a zoning amendment (I-1 to I-2).
Others:
• A 40 year old Minneapolis company looking to relocate and
expand their plastic injection molding operation. Need
20,000-30,000 sq ft and will employ 30-40 people.
• A newly created company which produces tight wrap machines.
Has 1.5 million in sales and is highly leveraged. Needs
20,000-25,000 sq ft.
+ A newly created company which produces fiberglass and plastic
panels for trucks, pickups, vans, and blazers. Looking to
lease or purchase smaller size facility (5,000 eq ft)
Approximate 15 employment.
• A roofing contractor service center/warehouse considering a
city industrial lot to construct an approximately 4,000 eq ft
facility. Employment of 6.
• A Fridley plastic injection molding company to expand& second
facility between Minneapolis and St. Cloud. Needs 25,000 sq
ft and will employ 25 people. Plans for a 1991 construction
with Monticello a serious consideration.
• A Plymouth company which paints equipment parts looking to
construct a 50,000 aq ft building. Monticello one of three
site locations. will employ 15-25 people.
• Potential local industry looking at a 1991 expansion of
25,000 sq ft.
• Federal Cartridqo, which is looking to relocate all or a
portion of their Anoka operation, has recoived recommended
site locations of the City of Monticello and Monticollo
Township. Their need is for 640 acres, which includes a
buffer area. Building would be approximately 600,000 sq ft.
C Serious consideration is for a Becker location. Negotiation
between NSP and the company aro underway for land and
compatibility of companies. If not a Monticello location, our
community would receive an economical benofit from a Becker
location.
34
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
JUNE 6, 1990
Monticello received its official recertification plaque at the Star
City quarterly meeting. The community representatives spent the
afternoon stating the strengths and weaknesses of the Star City
Program. Representatives were divided into four groups by city
population. General consensus was the program does assist a
community in organization for an economic development strategy;
however, the representatives questioned the amount of annual
paperwork required by cities for recertification. Also,
representatives felt City staff and volunteers supply information
(work for) to the state and the Star city receives no direct
benefits in return from the state.
JUNE 12, 1990
I attended a meeting by the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) which
outlined the extended area service criteria as passed by
legislature. The PUC passed a motion directing telephone companies
serving communities with satisfied EAS petitions to provide the PUC
with telephone traffic counts and two options of EAS costs within
45 days of the said meeting date. Monticello's interest petition
meets the PUC guidelines criteria outlined:
a) A petitioned telephone exchange must abut an existing
metro exchange. (The 295 exchange abuts the Albertville
exchange.)
b) Telephone traffic counts must Indicate that 50% of the
295 exchange numbers make at least one telephone call per
month to the metro exchange (study in process).
C) If b) is satisfied, the PUC will mail a ballot to all 295
exchanges including two option costs. Fifty percent of
the 295 exchanges must vote yes for metro telephone
service.
d) If c) is satisfied, then engineering and cable is
installed.
Two cost options are flat rate and per call rate.
JUNE 28, 1990
The IDC is housing a Retention and Expansion Breakfast for all
local industrial businesses. Two representatives from the 17
industries, IDC members, and City administrative staff will have a
chance to become better acquainted, discuss local industrial growth
issues, and view the summary of the Monticello R 6 B Survey report.
JUNE 27, 1990
TIF seminar on 1990 legislation changes and how it affects local
communities.
35
C
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
JUNE 21, 1990
Jeff O'Neill and myself joined Steve Henning and viewed the key
line for the community brochure. Printing is expected to be
completed in 2-3 weeks.
JULY 10, 1990
The Chamber of Commerce is sponsoring a customer sales and service
seminar at the NSP Training Center. The seminar will be presented
by Chuck Twedt Seminars of Annandale, Minnesota.
TO BE ANNOUNCED
Ground breaking for Remmele Engineering and Genereux Fine Wood
Products with reception at City Hall sponsored by the IDC.
36
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
Quarterly Department Head Report--Buildinq Official/Zoning
Administrator/Civil Defense Director. (G.A.)
BUILDING INSPECTION
Building permit activity is up over the previous year's
activity in 1989, with many more smaller projects being
started this year and a few of the bigger projects slated to
start this coming month. New housing starts are at or near
where they were last year at this time.
ZONING
To date we have approximately 278 public nuisance letters sent
out. We are getting a very good response from our initial
letters except for the latest ones that are going out for the
grass nuisance. We are experiencing problems in getting them
taken care of shortly after the 7 -day original notice. The
compliance of these is progressing very well. We are now
working closely with Mr. William McPhail, County Attorney, to
keep updated on the process of the ones that do go through
court. If they do not comply with the judge's court order or
if they do not comply at all, the Wright County Attorney's
office will be handling them for the City. We still have a
few of the same properties that have not complied as in years
past. we are working very closely with the Wright County
Attorney's office to get them back into court for further
action.
CIVIL DEFENSE
The civil defense sirens are working very adequately, and we
are prepared in the event of emergency notification to alert
the public if deemed necessary. With the additional rainfall
we have had over the past few weeks, we have noticed very
little or insignificant flooding.
MEADOW OAK/PAYNE BUILDERS ISSUE
Last week a meeting was sot up at City Hall between the
Farmers Home Administration, Payne Builders, residents of the
Meadow Oak development, and two members of the City Council.
The discussion settled around the minimum requirements of the
house that he had chosen to build and the proposed selling
price of the house when it was completed. The builder,
Mr. Robbie Payne of Payne Builders agroed to increase the size
of the overhead garage door opening to reflect a 12 -foot or
14 -foot width. with Mr. Payne agreeing to Increase the width
of the garage door and also to change the roof lino on the
second house to be built, the Meadow Oak development residents
that wore present felt that some of their concerns were
answered and they could address them to the other Moadow Oak
rosidonts that weren't present at this meeting.
37
I�
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
Quarterly Department Head Report --Senior Citizen Director.
(K.H.)
Our ongoing activities include walking group, advanced
ceramics, beginner's ceramics, craft group, rug making,
woodworking, free legal aid, free hearing aid checks, fr=ee
income tax service, free blood pressure checks, dances,
bridge, 500, whist, pinocle, cribbage, pool, and Fun Day.
Board of Directors and group meetings were held January,
March, and May. Home health care meetings were held February,
April, and June. County meetings were January, March, and
May. Community Ed Senior Task Force meets monthly. The task
force set its goal for 1990 to do more outreach from the
center by visiting shut-ins.
Articles for the Community Education bulletin were written
February and May. A weekly column for the Monticello Times is
written on happenings at the center and pertinent information
concerning the seniors. I also wrote the City Beat column in
January and will again in July.
National volunteer week was in April, and many senior
volunteers were honored at the Wright County Volunteer Banquet
and at the Monticello -Big Lake Community Nursing Home.
May being "Older Americans Month" was extremely busy. We
hosted a "55 and Alive Defensive Driving" class. We had a
center display at Senior Expo at Crossroads Mall i n St. Cloud,
and one day of expo we took a chartered bus to Expo. On
May 5, 32 attended the senior prom and 16 attended W.C.0 _A.
annual Fun Day. On May 17 we had a one -day city trip.
We also sponsored an essay contest for 6th grade students on
"My Favorite Older Person." There wore eight classes
involved. All of the prizes were made at the center and were
awarded on Award Day, May 29.
May 18 was the center's annual open house, "Ethnic Day,"wh-ich
is our thank -you to our community for the continued suppoxt.
38
Council Agenda - 6/25/90
10. Consideration of an ordinance amendment expanding the definition of
the public nuisance ordinance pertaining to grass and weeds.
(J.O.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The City's present public nuisance ordinance currently describes
any area within 100 feet of a building that has existing weeds or
grass in excess of 6 inches in height to be considered a public
nuisance. Building Official, Gary Anderson, has noted that in some
cases, limiting the public nuisance order to only 100 feet from a
building sometimes leaves properties with large areas that are
still not being maintained in controlling weeds and/or grass. For
example, on larger parcels of property, areas surrounding parking
lots, fence structures, and even driveways are currently not
considered a building; and thus, areas within 100 feet of these
improvements do not have to be maintained by abutting property
owners. In other words, a vacant lot next to an improved parcel
cannot currently be required to maintain their grass and weeds even
though they may only be a few feet away from a parking lot area,
etc.
In discussing this with our City Attorney, it was his suggestion
that our ordinance be amended to indicate that any area within
100 feet of an existing public or private improvement could be
required to maintain their property. A public improvement would
include our street right-of-ways or any improvements we have on
public property, and the private improvement would include those
areas such as driveways, parking lots, and fences, etc.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Approve the ordinance amendment which would change the area
described to 100 feet from an existing improvement rather than
existing building.
2. Do not change the ordinance.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Since our current ordinance requires an occupied lot to maintain
their entire property by cutting weeds and grass, it does seem
appropriate to require an abutting vacant property or improved
parcel to also maintain their property to within 100 feet of the
existing improvements rather than just a building. In addition,
this would also require properties to maintain their frontage along
a public right-of-way to a distance of at least 100 feet. As a
result, the staff recommends the ordinance amendment be adopted.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of ordinance amendment. 4 \�
39
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, HEREBY ORDAINS THAT
ORDINANCE SECTION 7-1-1 (D) pertaining to public nuisance acts
shall be amended as follows:
7-1-1 (D): In any area within 100 feet of an existing public
or private improvement, the existence of weeds or
grass in excess of six (6) inches in height or any
accumulation of dead weeds, grass, or brush. A
public improvement includes any structure or
Improved right-of-way. A private improvement
Includes, but is not limited to, such improvements
as parking lots, fences, and driveways associated
with an occupied lot.
Adopted by the City Council this 25th day of June, 1990.
City Administrator
C
Mayor
0/0
*P MAy
•- - -_ .--. _ _ --- y.TD_t--% 6AK--Zo DAT_+ T�1 T*43
% 1
RRC FINANCIAL
SYSTEM
CITY OF MONIICE
-6/11/90 1+:31:19- - - -- --
- -
E•o-nditur "ide-line
^,b2OR,VO4.-Ob-PALE-
LEVEL OF DETAIL 1.0 7HRU 7.0
FOR THE PERIOD(S)
JAN 01, 1990 THROUGH MAY
31, 1990
6T-MTO-DOSSED-ACS-Y-T(7-COSSEO-REm43N 1r V•
199D FINAL
ENCUMBERED
AND IN PROCESS AND IN PROCESS
BALANCE
PCT
______
- .-- -.-
---._--_-_.
. --gam is f
______________
______________
101
GENERAL FUND
„
47110
COUNCIL
16,775.00
0.00
948.34
5,158.87
10.96 G. 13
37 ---
F--4130-1-ADMI
N IS TRAT.I VE
140,476.00
0.00
T3 .03O.74
b8.-747- 30
81-.J-27_30-4-1
- - --
-
41337
41410
CLCC COMMISSION
ELECTIONS
0.00
8.800.00
0.00
0.00
?,177.33
0.00
5.077.37-
0.00
5.077.31
8,900.00
999 •-------•-"
0
4 1570
"1---- - - ----
-- ---
00
415AO
AUDI)
11.7g0.O0
0.00
0.00
0.00
11.750.00
0
41550
ASSESSING
15,150,00
0.00
7,344.93
17.087,77
3.062.78
79 •-•----
-41801-LEGAL--
03,-775.-00
0.00--'-60-F-.-70
�7•---
�'
41810
PLANNING 6 ZONING
31.300.00
0.00
4.744.72
11.146.97
19.553.03
37 ---
41920
DATA PROCESSING
55.900.00
0.00
3,173.09
81,080.14
8.0390.14- 110 ••-•--•--•'
_41040
CITY HALL-_-_ --_
_-_39.450.00
0.00
8._.224_74
20._-1-14._.17
19,335_83
-SO----- __
41090
DEPUTY PEGISTPAR
59.250.00
0.00
4,550.90
72.970.37
36.328.83
38 ---
47701
LAV ENFORCEMENT
750.100.00
0.00
17.508.11
67.5?3.55
8).566.45
41 ----
...-42201_-F
IRE_ --- ----126.325_00-
0_,00
^.�88-.90-49.
.939--.8] 7.13.388_.79-3°
-•-
47401
CL'I L01NO IN S PEC T IONSi
40.975.00
0.00
2.075.58
9,513.95
37,461.05
70 --
47501
CIVIL DEFENSE
9.950.00
0.00
379.37
1,811.87
5.]77.)3
24 •-
-4770.1
_
ANIMAI CONTROL-------- -
- - 10.600.00--
0.00
t. 23.1-..12
6.893.70
0..700.30-4.1-_-_-
43110
PV/ADMIN 6 ENGINEERING
89.795.00
0.00
9.778.97
34,090.41
34,704.59
49 ----
�,
43170
PV/STF'EI7E. 6 AILEYS
100,700.00
0.00
7,773.99
70.565.33
96.134.67
47 •---
4312"
PV/ICC-6 -SN OV------ -
- 12,250.00
0.00
20-00
1..-1.10.04
1.1...1,39.96_9
43,17
Pv/SH 01. 6 GARAGE
74.050.00
0.00
9393.99
6,099.50
17,951,50
77 --
�,'
43140
PV/PARKING LOT$
3.475.00
0.00
90.47
701.94
3.143.18
9
---43780
t•v/SIREE-i-LiGH77NG-.._ _ _--
_ 30.500.00 ---
-- 0.00-----3.538.67--79,533.98_-
_-79.969..14-.49_-
4)730
REFUSE COLLECTION
272.000.00
0.00
10.8039.07
74,399.59
141,911.cg
33 ---
�,
45771
MUSC UM
3.840. DO
0.00
00.04
1,734.58
7,705.41
79 •-
,-_--451.7b--fiENIOR-CENTER
---_30.135.00
0.00
2..-10437 '0.030__72
20...104..98-73
__-
45176
COMMUNITY EO
16.500.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10,500.00
0
45177
Y.M.C.A
7.500.00
0.00
625.00
3.125.00
4,375.00
4t -•--
-
-4 5701
CA R1(L 6 RFCRLAi1pN - - -
_ 107.075.00
----0.00
7.534..0)
40501
ECOr+OMIC DEVELOPMENT
5).075.00
0.00
1,437.95
7.050.49
45.074.52
13 -
•
49010
CEMF TFRY
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
49201
UNALLOCAIED- ---- - --- ----
0.00
0.00--0.00
12.860.00
17650.00•-999-•-+•�......--�. 7,)
40740
I++SUR ANC - UNALI OC AT
46.050.00
0.00
15.00
30.905.10
15.054.90
G7 ------
•----TO1
TO IAL:
GENERA7• FUND
1.627.340.00
-0.00
----771.9)7.37--867,010.77_----071
,)79.7)-40-•--:
.--
*P MAy
•- - -_ .--. _ _ --- y.TD_t--% 6AK--Zo DAT_+ T�1 T*43
% 1
11
•al OfE f!NANcl nl C•VS1lM
int• QI' :tE•N,1•;is
L__-pL1 t1.c0-11+:54 ,60=-----.--__
-_. __tr.u.n..r.-F++-i.+•!•1-Ln..
A,'G
^n^_.fOA nrie
LEVEL Of E•rl All 1.0 THVI) 7.0
F'•R• tHi P(`PI(:.t'S1
Jfr: 01. 1CM
THR•L)G)I MM
3J. 19-0
.
u
nntrrr.
,990 ACTUAL 1990
REVISED
IN
Of.LANCE•_-.
PCl
•+I ____________________ _______
-_MON
-_._ ---_EARNED._-_
--_
,
• t0t aEul F: nt CnNE1
-•G1• •^s;cN; AC VALOPlr. 1'ATfF
t, . C, c,
.iYS. f1 G5.00
V.DO
0. n0'
+..7C:•.GG5.00
0
.iJJGy7%'-•-dO-VALOR6A��J:36
41
n nn
*--
n -
.1-3 103+ ^1C.T•ILt HOMF lA/'
O.GD
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
• 319:0 I'EN E INT - AO VALORfM LAYS
e. noD.DD
E. 000.00
C.00
0.00
0.000.00
0
Ls ty70 -FD:LE S_tp-TAY-SAL L AI20L1-_
_.. l,.On
n nnn
Tn
n
1I 37••' 110!109 ' g119F,
75. MJ0
14.150.00
7.05
O. CO
tS."70.00
0
(%-p .ICE•1SE
•.400.00
1. GOV. Of,
n. oil
157.50
:.667.50
4
`^11i_
:..r nn
enn nn
P. on
^s nn
Tsa nn
n
r( 37105' 07•tEk 8U5 LICE NSfS !• I•EPMIT6
0.00
0.00
O.C'0
D.00
0.00
0
32^.tl BVILOW, DEf.MTTS
h9.000.00
45.000.00
9.842.07
III -7hb.37
30.799.6E
3,7 ---
�_35212.VACIANUS/LON011 IOMAL-o
• USE.S
_._-L.d00-On
a nq0 nn
tn.I)n
c
nnn
a37?11 o1,UM311+G CO1rI/ECT ION PEP,MITS
G. OD
0.00
5(�.DO
•F 32761 AN I. XIOSES �
700. n0
?C'0. 00
75.00
70.00
'30._00
35 _
+a^rt
9n-nn
rfl nn
nnn
0 nn
%n An
It
37707 CADLE FRANCHISE FEE
�J OTHER NON-BUS 0 PERMITS
0.00
0.00
0.00
760.50
0.00
_ '0.00
0
32j90 LIC
(JFOA�CAN3f. - =-
1.500.00
n or,
1.500.00
n An
I" nn
1.085.93
it nn
388.71-
n
126' -- -. •-l.l�I
u 391So FEOERAL GFANTS - C-VEL DEF
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
;0•
3340, 16;AL BOVEP.11r.ENT ME1
O:OP
0.00
0.110
'0.00
0.00
EI
,136,0$-,1•nar-Tr An CR:MTT
q n
n nn
n n•t
n' nn
n n0
r.
"I 39609 M!-OI L! HOME I IOME_611 A0' L R E U I.1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0:00
0'
�7, 33620 FIRE CEF1_ +In
87.000.00
97.000.00
0.00
7.001.75 -
29.116.16'
4
91 I�
-13L 21. VOLICI. �U[P_i,/.I D,____�� �-..,.-t0.-500.00.�
�.10.600..00�r..��0.00�
^.-0D, '+d.::,114;00�-
^1SID COV1041v Hld�.ML•rV-'GRfNTi
° i^!T•?0
y.^no.DO
0.0•r
0.00-U-
�q --Clt-146 IN((7:TIVE-Cimm",
0.c0
0.00.
1" 00
1..779.
"2,'n
' �S.tDS__LIi:fJ�/SLLC:L•'-"..LLN illi ..___,__�. •" :JD
"r AI•;0b, LALI 01 NAPS a s•UDU` L4T7S!'JI •00.00
anp-1n
I00.00
q,;pn
0.00
wngrrp.
n - - Sjc
• 16100 !•4 LICOENR? SALES/OF00T'+ RIG
05.000.00
64.000.00
10.818.1.111,7
10. to 1.i,
36.809.71
ae -
li
...3Lto7_ JS&ISLM[N1" SIAECHLS�_-. -
_...--tar-op
rqn n
7r an
+te nn
-w tLaz
•a y„
` P. ;..A ••.-^;C. ".Il •. FEES
0.JJ
0.10
O.OL1,
0.00
COD
.0
1�1 !'I LOc r*FC s•:'-; ;I.Ir.'v t•• rn•,-s•er1
1-3.elr10r
,r.g7•.00
0.00
7. 1q0. 75
+...l6hLL,.�S.iaA-.r_-. .,.'S,yi-•-e:�,L,__•--�_ r •r.�-
ft-nn
a.a,rr
a n1. nn
w ry.••in.
I. n �___-_.., .n �... lr1.
3'n18D .'e:i ef'E
If ,con.ol.
11.0110.00
0.00
0.00
16.000.00
0
34PC9 •-•-H•F' L1rA=."' Ir1P Lf PVIf15
5. DOE, (D
S. AD. OC
170.00
nn7.IP
6.7A0. ;7
1,
116- 1.•1:44, E:•JVl'NQMCJIT I!I11i
z,j It
0.100.J0
•nP.•.f.
L.JUL.00
•Dr1.r0
_ .9_9.2'--
O,I•q
70_
n.f•n
o =1&"-ib--`4---.----
Ino 911 .1 T J
• a(-: ID '(Rf'7 `. •'; dr,C
71.15r 00
/• 11^.O.i
7^]Y IO.8:'.GP
5'.97E.6C
.,. Y: �: :Il-.: _ _�-.-. __--
- +..100._0 •. yBn r..
1rT n
r r•
70.00
•-a nn
,
11'&0 Ef�! qF PI;tgtly
750,00
760.00
C.00
750.000
-
• .n;+na i,:1 JL'7/41-.1411=ti M!•, rA
W1'
.••0'.00
1,406.00
1.1100.00
0.nn
1.363.+17-
3. E67.A'1
198 .�.,. 0
.3672& -01NLR NII'- FEVINIJI.
_
.. _ 00.00
-_11.III-__-.16-^•,
c+• •c
19?03 1HIF1+ "..Mv+J.: 1.71ef•ar.
C •0
O. A!1
L:.In
P.
O.:r
• ^f... `.IANII•s f.b1. 11. 1I r ...
f.7n
0.nO
h
A.An
Me
0
j T--TA1I GENI'9A1 run E1
1.!71.640.00
1.611.660.00
76.07'.19
CF. 777. 76
1.737.710.01
b
�
+J
,ESRC: FINANCIAL SYSTEM
WARRANT GATE V4NOOR
DESCRIPTIO.'+
AMOUNT CLAIM INV?
GENERAL CHECKING
_2g91.'? OW3-1./90-VAL,L1E—DAIS HOA4v
C_aO LA
RETMA FFAgTRTI TTV S i
AAn_nn
23843 05/31/90 DEPT OF TRADE & ECON
120
REG FEE FOR O.KOROPCHA
35.00
29849 05/31/90 ANDERSON/GARY
11
MILEAGE EXPENSE
121.51
—2-9364--0 .3y<y0—AonQT-A-QE�
4
AHTMAI n0A0rrnuc
Ign nn
29851 05/31/90 SAL:WEOEL/PATTY
185
ANIMAL CO`:TROL CONTRA
489.00
29852 05/31/90 MN OF.PART OF NATURAL
118
WATFRCRA'=T REGISTRATI
453.00
20081 nG/1I/Rn rnVF2NMFNT TRATNTN(:
?9
RFn. or: - 1.KmR/1PrMAK
RS_flfl
GENE?AL CHECKING
TOTA1. 2.3?3.51
'F3kC, FINANCIAL
SYSTEM
0640; "a
n 7
WARRANT
OATE
VEN064
DE'i'CRIPTION
AMOUNT
CLAIM _-tJVO.
L
GENERAL CHECKING
054nn
146-.4
-i -v". -let 0017c
n
29855
08Y02/90
L A N G E / 'A S R C T E
.90049
RECYCLING PRIZE
50.00-
298513
1)6102/SO
1i POS'MAS
? 0
se'w""1-J'2-_::1 0057A(li
20856
OF/OVS0
V.S. 0OSTrAA-:iZ
2*0
?QWAGC
I48.25
TAT61
29857
06/02/90
U.S. POSTMASTER
210
MAII.ING OOSTAG-7
500.00
20853
06/06/90
AME RSAOV MTV
8
RE.-;TROib.mS/ELLISON P
1.0113.30
7AA4Q
nF;/ng/Qn
AMIMWA fAH�JTV
14_2_44?0- 1 fVrN1'rTTe.!Jq
?141Q?-
29960
06/06/90
ARCA MINNESOTA INC.
.90047
AMNESTY OAVOU CHG S
1.358.00
29361
06/06/90
BRIDGEWATER TILEPH16N
24
TEL5DHCNE CHARGES
988.95
29861
06/06/90
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
—45.54
')nAAI
00/68 /96
AjDTnrrWAT90 TCl COYMPJ
I&
T0l`5!0HQlji: t'KAQ(' F q
_AQ ni
2986,
08/00/90
BRIOGEWATER TELEPHON
24,
TELEPHONE CHARGES
—29.18
29961
06/05/90
BRIOGEWATER TELEPHON
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
— 67.25
--7.48aa-46"
a 14 a 0
8 R 7 Q G 6 u A 1: 0 C 16, liibmqm
r -ca
-A7 010
'29851
06/06/90
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
20.00
29881
06/06/90
BRIOGEWATER TELEPHON
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
13,.50
40615 1
06.1001420
A 0T0GZ-'A'Zc Ut RON—
q'.
On
2:8P1
00/06190
BRIOGEWATER T E L E PH 011
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
20.00
2961,
06106/90
BRIOGEWATER TELEPHON
24
T E L E P H C FJ E, CHARGES
36.28
*1.
T0: C 0 H qbj 0 t 14 A 0 r, T Q
-) a '_ Q
—
08/06/910
BRIOGEWATER', TELFP140N
74
TEI.EPHO-NE CHARGES
15.00
29601
0-6/66/10
SR16GV'ArIR- 7-c-1 Vmo.m
24
TZLEO4ONE C14iRGES
6_,74
29002
00/00/90
CLARV '60AROMAN CO-
.6001.1
ZO.NrN(3 SUS/j ONEILL
157.,50
,29331
05/66/10
CORROW SANI t:,4
0
MAY GAlZIAGE SERVIC
12.101.8i
J
--4.0921
06,05420
04 1—— —1. itl
I.,
49865
06/00/90
FARNUm/TJ0
.90030
8LD rNSP MANUAL
12.80
'29906
00/05/90
FEEORITE CONTROL -S. 1
55
CVCLINOER CMG
110.00
29056
06106/90
FEEORITE CONTROLS. 1
56
"'MLOR109NATZR OEPT
1.201.02
29067
05/08/90
13OULO 8ROS. CHEV-OLO
70
REPAIRS/FIRE OEPT
20.50
29000
06/05/90
GRIEFNOW SHE!T METAL
73
REPAIRS/WATER OEPT
1.00
aRc FI�1AN�:.AI, vY•srEm
WARRAtiT GATE v;NOOR
06/08/90
OESCRIPTION
AMOUNT CLAIM INvC-
GENERAL CHECK[N�
29879
1QR1Q
-
LtNO8ER0 CICO?ATING
MM nFCiPT ti
w_2986$-08L88{s}9 �+4•XCH..0.C�e+u^^6�-.^•
' _
_ *<^
n a -
29869 06/08/90 HATCH-PETERSCN
SALES
94 HOScS/STREET DEPT
24.57
29869 06/06/90 HATCH -PETERSON
SALES
94 EAR P40Tc"CTORS/ST
OEPT 26.38
—29889-46/08%90-taaTCH-PIe.T.rGR..Sttnt
SALES
-- fl4_.ilr1/�,3L$E:tE:R-C,OLL--5.3.3.q______ ._
29869 06/06/90 HATCH -PETERSON
SALES
94 FI?E HOSE/ST DEPT
50.85
O'NEILL/,EFF
101
T*AVEL EX•/OATA PROC
4'+9.56 aCH: t -.OTA_
29870 00/06/90 HAVES/WILMA
29870 06/06/90 HAVES/WILMA
29871 06/06/90 HERMES/•1£RaY
29872 06/06/90 HOGLUNO TRANSPORTATI
T2903�8/88/nn +rOLNce a rPdfCt
2987 06/06/90 HOLMES 8 GRAVEN
187 06106/90 14OLMES a GRAVE.4
.8Z3 nR/nAlQm Mol wc4 z rPe1 Frl
29873 06/06/90 HOLMES 3 GRAVEN
261 HIST INFO SALARY 100.00
285 HIST INFO SALARY 31.25CR
31 LICOAPY JANITORIAL S£ ???.SO
84 HEAPT BUS CONTRACT 4.408.14
RC_15E. Fi nyp F}IFl LIR nn
96 b11C'��e /N MAPT 191,41
06 PRCC SER/MARTic DEV 228.00
4A PPPF SFO/PFM91_F Ofin 111.4n
B6 PROF SERV/TAPPER DEV 606,601
--::o 1.704.51
29874 06/08/90 HUMANE SOCIETY/WRIGH 07 ANIMAL CONTROL SER 20.00
10614 n6t. na/cQ T C M A QCTTPFMctiT 9!p PAygni l brolo[TTAN Rpn R*
29875 06/06/90 I.C.M.A. RETIREMENT 08 PAYROLL oEDUCTION 102.04
882.91
29876 06/06/90 LEERSSEN/-!AN£TTI 204 MIST INFO SALARY
29976 00/06/90 LEERSSEN/JANETTE 294 HIST INFO SALARY
29077
06/08/90
LICERTY COMPUTER SUP
99
COMPUTED SUPPLIES
29879
1QR1Q
06106/90
nit /A6/O0
LtNO8ER0 CICO?ATING
MM nFCiPT ti
?33
PAINT/C:TV HALL
RF.:
X
29860
00/05/90
OC tlaTiiC
MONTICELLO CLINIC
r 10
.90044
TOM BOSE PHYS EXAM
29001
00/06/90
NORWEST INVESTMENT S
155
CO.VPUTEP PAYMENT
101141
29862
M/nRIon
00/06/90
n.Nl't l /.lice
O'NEILL/JEFF
-it
161
T. s7Fl fvC1AnMTrJ
TP.AVEI EXP/PL&20N
7392
00/06/90
O'NEILL/,EFF
101
T*AVEL EX•/OATA PROC
- 30.2
n8 nneian
A�Njryi t 1jvoc
.4.
T1.ay9, FrP/nAT♦ 000f'
29392
03/06/90
0lljil L/JQFF
'S,
T"+AV BL •dP/SUS T4ANJ
'CHECK TOTAL'
*CHECK TOT$
104.00
32.50CR
T I . 4l •�4Fry
181.90
14.55
1Kp nn
239.25
6,407.61
4 �A�
51,00 1
11.An _
5.93
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
-44y=0.7-r'SO---^_ ' .: ? ^ ", Z
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
^o— 7 -fin Tv
29383 06/06/90 PETTY CASH
29883 06/06/90 PETTY CASH
--2'j-�:Ji.s
298°? 03/06/90 PETTY rASN
?983'5 06/08/90 PETTY CASH
n:..,., V.C.3.:yt8..♦ .,.....est
OESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVOI,s
.ne .aT-v 14114/—\L.Eo oo..y 7 1S
156 PETTY CASH/OOSTAGE 23.65
196 MISS RECOgO FEES 10.00
FC i nn
1e5 5ycs;.Ef,. "-S 5.5?
166 SVOLIES/CITY HA 4.72
ali it. ., icr.
29894
06/06/90
PROFCSSIONAL
SERVIC-c
175
WWT? CONTRACT PAYM
29.405.17
2989`5 6(]/00/9
PUBLIC
EMP1.O}EES
RC
178 EM--"LOY£E
PERA WH
938.. 19
29 85
08 7 Tt-,SO
PU91.1C
rlA .
rT
_SMP/.O.Vi RS
?/,12YEgS
?F -RA *4
199.36
700P�.
n,0l0A/3n
011g. Te
FMOI nVFF:
OFT
17R FVOInv;
H
An,RA
29885
06/06/90
PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES
RET
178
EMPLOYERS
PERA WH
24.74
29985
06/06/90
nR/nR/a-..0..-
PUBLIC
of-Al
EMPLOYEES
-do, -[EE,$
RET
AET
176
EMPLOYERS
nVVRq
PERA WH
-OA
5.50
.__2a,las
29895
08/06/90
SC
PUBLIC
a n
EMPLOYEES
RET
176
176
-f MOt
EMPLOYERS
O WH
PERA WH
7L71.
29.85
29985
08/06/90
PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES
RET
176
EMPLOYERS
PERA WH
74.08
a
OCT
tta rMO1 nVFOc
OFRA—WH
1i 0,
29989
06/05/90
PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES
RET
170
EMPLOYERS
PERA WH
0.31
29885
06/06/90
PUBLIC
—aLrt,
EMPLOYEES
RET
176
EMPLOYERS
PERA WH
105.88
RA
---20$88-O
-29885
oo.400
08/08/90
PUBLIC
EMR4pveea
EMPLOYEES
RET
RET
128
176
EM01PUEAS
EMPLOYERS
RERA_WH
PERA WH
no
118.37
29885
00/08/90
PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES
RET
178
EMPLOYERS
PERA WH
80,.84
:-2.0885-0"/OBf80
RUSLZI
EtG#L1iYE6S-RE.T
77a
CM01V{L,FA
090A UH
7a R1)
,29885
00/08/90
PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES
RET
176
EMPLOYERS
PERA WH
5.04
29885
08/06/90
PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES
RET
176
EMPLOYERS
PERA WH
1.08
1 *28BB5 D6�IIdi90.PUBL:I4:.EM014iF,Ri�,RFrT�.
.'76..F.mmAY.ERSJERA_AH
11 7t
:9885,08106/90
PU*yLIC:EMPLOYEES
RET
176
EMPLOV:RS
PERA WH
9.91
2999608/06/90
P1-5LIC
EMPLOYEES
RET
178
EMPLOYERS
PERA WH
7•]y1
'29*,388
08/08/90
RHI:IANCE OA -A CORPOR
180
FAC MACHINE
CASE
49.20 '
29997
06/06/90
V A;TE CAPITnL CPSOIT
193
DAY -'l -LL 040LiCTIONS
.30.00'
-.•7iti0�.-4i�OiLaB-.:'►�3•WG$�J,i40X
29000 00/00/90 WOLFSTELLER/PICHARO
29890 08/00/90 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
29890 06/06/90 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
•=ids&i1-OS/-06 00--.;ZGH-T—COU+1-'GaI--B. r!
79090 06/06/90 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
29090 08/00/90 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
20890 04/0614& WRIGb4t-C,*UaTY.4-TATE
29890 06/06/90 WRIGHT COUNTY STAT!
79690 00/06/9() WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
29890 07/06/90 WRIGHT COUNT/ STATE
79090 06/05/90 WR/GMT C.'UN-Y STA-;
n
217 MONTHLY MILEAGE EXP 300.00
222
EMPLOYEE FICA WH
1,040.20
227
EMPLOYERS
FICA
WH
311.04
222
EMPLOYERS
FICA
WH
126.46
272
EMPLOYERS
FICA
WH
29.56
. 723
_SMP/.O.Vi RS
-F ILA•-WA— .-, ° I%
222
EMPLOVERS
FICA
WH
9.39
??:
EMPLOVERS
FICA
WH
42.25
112
:MP,.OVERS
FICA
WH
57.39
27?
E«11 -OYER!
FI --A
WH
100.4)
ORC Fii AN CIAI SYST:+
WARRANT DATE VENOOR
OESCRIPTION
AMOUNT CLAIM I71v�
GENERAL CHECKING
?9890 06/06/90 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
222 EMPLOYERS FICA VH
304.60
29890 06/06/90 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
222 EMPLOYERS FICA MH
8.61
_ ZLU40-064O"j--
29890 06/06/90 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
222 EMPLOYERS FICA WH
138.03
29390 06/06/90 WRIGHT COUNTY STAT'c
222 EMPI.OYFRS FICA MH
50.97
CT•.—
9'f'. CCRCR- Wu 7
.I SIR
29890 06/08/90 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
222 EMPLOYERS FFICA WH
16.92
29890 06/06/90 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
222 EMPLOYERS FICA WH
29.56
'ZRAP11 f1G/D$/o[1 VR Ta HT Pd11NTV ST-A-TP
799 FMPI AVFFC M;n Tf.ARF NH
in. 7_S
29890 06/06/90 WRIGMT COUNTY STATE
22? EMPLOYERS MEDICARE 4H
5.88
29890 06/06/90 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
222 EMPLOYERS FICA WH
1.91
7QAQA A6/fl6/AO WRIGHT rQllNTV CTATF
717 FMPIOYcR^ MtQIfAR% MH
2.OA _
29890 06/06/90 WRIG1iT COUNTY STATE
222 EMPLOYERS FICA WM
12.21
29690 06/06/90 WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
222 EMPLOYERS MEDICARE MH
3.04
-
4-SA1.
1.11 •t•HFfK TnTA-,'
G'cNERAL CHECKING
TOTAL 68.508.85
ovc FINANCIAL SYSTEM
WARRANT DATE VENDOR DEs"mrm" AMOUNT CLAI, Ip.
aEwERAu rusxws
.-'
297-su6+.^/9o-ocwmSxfZExw,
2an9/ 08//5/90 000x/unw 'onmn u, urE/m^s p^zwTxwo 200.00
2y892 uo/.s/oo ncoomNc coxsrxuorIu nos ornsr vnxwwE^uow ^».`u/.os '
79891-OBL-LSlSQ-14C-&TzvLLa I -LRF —A-4A2-on�___
29093 vv/`s/mo MoNrzcsLLu rzp, wcp* ',s mcs v/w/,IRcmcw v^osp 9.3 ?CR
1,840.63 "cncCv rv,�
-----'---` - -----
si'a^L cvsvIws ,or^L ^s.vn,.x'
`
�
- -- - --- --� - — �w
SRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
.,_„pE+Lz4.l9lL_t2,:OS:2'w-..,_ ._._ ____ _._.,. �. _.,. _..__ ..� _Oi:b:+irsemeu.c.JourltJl., ... •-.-
�l IRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM IN:.
.. GEN £:iAl CHECKING __... _.__.- ..�..,_ ._-....�_..-�,. ..�. �._..,.-..-�. ...,
-28884-06�1A�9�A_L&_T�:NF.t1„YSLEMS __.__LS•.LIRE_F4HOtUE_CHAF,GES .-96 ____ _. __ -
29895 06/14/90 BARTHEL/JERRY & BEA .90036 TREE REPLACEMENT PROGM 29.13
29896 06/14/90 BUFFALO BITUMINOUS. 25 SANG/CLASS V -STREETS 862.36
_-_ 2989L06L14.1SOSARTER/LANCE- . __80053_AECYCLlNai__&.iNS._CAEO.II J. -S It
29898
06/14/90
CITY OF BENSON
282
MEMBER DUES/OATA PROC
10.00
29899
06/14/90
CITY Of MAPLE GROVE
90055
NATER MyTER VALVE
500.00
_.__
28900_06tt4190�0A:L7.0 COAST .,__ _ _15.
WATER OE22 SUP.PLIES-_.
--5.4_40--
29900
06/14/90
COAST TO COAST
35
WATER DEPT PARTS
18.50
29900
06/14/90
COAST TO COAST
3S
OIL - TREE DEPT.
6.98
29900
09/ 14/QO
rQAST TA COAST
iR MTCr QFpAT� CUP _US KS
__0 - 1.7
29900
06/14/90
COAST TO COAST
35
MISC SUPPLIES/SEVER
0.79
29900
08/14/90
COAST TO COAST
3S
SMALL TCOLS/PARKS
29.47
..__29221L2Hi,1@OSQA:T_T..O
:QAS.T__.. ____
_5
1: *'_tLEaJfdSKS,__258..50._,.:_
29900
06/14/90
COAST TO COAST
35
CITY HALL SUPPLIES
27.56
29900
06/14/90
COAST TO COAST
35
EOUIPMENT PARTS/PAQXS
27.47
29900
06/thff10
CQ QT TA rn&yST
4q
c1FANTN. COp/DAawo
!4i„Ok
29900
06/14/90
COAST TO COAST
35
SUPPLIES/SHOP & GARAGE 2.19
/
`9900
06/14/90
COAST TO COAST
35
CLEANING SUP/LIESRARY
16.23
1�
ognn
0R/14/96
COAST TQ CDASZ-
10.
TF1 9641AtjFl1
?0001
68/14100
C00V 011P1rATINGP0Q0
Al
COPY MTCII TBSAQV
468.10 wCNECK TOTA
'
29902,
06/14/90
QAHLGREN SHAROLOW AN
45
Ide'b
OAA PROF SERVICES
430.18
29903
06/14/90
DAVIS WATER EOUIPMEN
290
BATTERY REPLAC/SEWER
69.00
-.19904..081.14180_QEMCDN
DISPOSAL- INC _288
JUNK.AMNESL+L.4A Fr 2.-195_170-
29908
08/t4/90
OENN%FRANKLIN
295
OAA SALARY
75.00
29906
08J14j90-4W.
UERF$ HATER CARE S
X49
RENTAL HOUSE (REIMS)
! 14.25
-29907
00114/90-ENGSMOMLLEROB
= ._293.OAA„SALAQY..-
,, _,._2b.00 - r --_-
29907
06/14/90
ENGSTQOM/LEROY
29)
OAA MIL?AGE EXPENSE
87.50
142.50 •C;+ECK TOT
2 9908
08/14/90
FAIR/FRAM �- -
298
OAA SALARY-- •�
15.00 �.
29909
OQ/U./90_.GLENWQQ0
IUUDOE_ INC
..90058
COMPUTER_@KfiJ.CL.RE.L..D.00..A0
29910
05/14/90
GOOLER/GLORIA
794
OAA SALARY
175.00
_
29910..061/4/_90
G.00LER/GLORIA _,
244-OAA..MILLAGE_ E.XPEN.SE
34.75
199.75 *CHICK TO`
BRC FINANCIAL, SYSTEM
O�.t4(99_12:;08:22• -- _,._ .. _ t.__...._.._---
-_...__�137Vf�:9Lent:..,JSurn•3Lc,_
.r.. _..__
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
',OESCRIPTION�
AMOUNT
CL'AIM1ri
GENERAL CHECKING
__29911 Ofi/14f-90_lG-0YAF_SLA.LE_0 E_:AL"._-6,0._GOP.MER_S•TATiL-CALLS.._.
29912-06/14/90 HARR'I'S AUTO SUPPLY
78 SUPPLIES/SEVER
0.10
29912 06 14 90 HARRY' S AUTO ZU.PPL Y _,8 PAnUWATFP nFPT
14,_07
-
29912 06/14%90 HARR'I'S AUTO SUPPLY
78 PARTS/SHOP & GARAGE
11.45
29912 06/14/90 HARRY'S AUTO SUOOIV
78 EQUIP PARTS/PARKS
15.00
__399.12 OSLt4/9A HARDY! $�U_r0 �i+0P1,V�
_ - 78�PDI,I �$ Rws:r-_-4Q.
Q3-
65.70
*CHECK TOTAL',
I
.. 29913 061_?1�Q_►3��4�!NQLx1 4E[+s. _�9.Q9.54-3EFUNQ1-5FyEl;�_WiLE3___-
29914 06/14/90 HERMES/•JERRY
31 LIBRARY JANITOR SERV
227.50
29915 06/14/90 I.C.,.A. RETiREMENr
88 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS
500.83
29915 06/14/90 I.C.M.A. RETIREMENT
88 PAYROLL DEDUCTION
182.04
682.97
•CHECK_TATAL
29916 06/14/90 INT UNION OF OPERAT
90 UNION DUES
96.00
29917 06/14/90 INTER CONF OF SLOG O
291 MEMBERSHIP DUES
75.00
_ 29918 06/14/90 1 8 PROPERTIES
.90051 RECYCLING PRIZE
50.00
29919 06/14/90 KOVICH/PATRICA
287 MILEAGE -EXPENSE
4.5.0
- 29919 06/14/90 KOVTCH/PATRTCA
297 MILEA,F E%DENSE/Q:p 7.pO_-
______`�f,
11.59
•CHECK TOTAL
29920 08/14 90 MARCO 9l19INERR PRQ011
108 MTC AGRFF./TYPEWRITER
17S.On
29921 08/14/90 MAUS F0004,
108 TOWELS'/SHOP & GARAGE
16.85'
/74/90 MAUOQ9 -
29921 08 1S FO
i'4@ 4LF.ANING SUP/ANIMAL
72.09• .
29921 06/14/90 MAUS FOODS
108 CITY MALI SUPPLIES
S6-,11
29921 05/14/90 MAUS FOODS
106 CLEANING SUP/LIBRARY
3.18
X992 t 06 10 MAiiS _FOOf14
-�0{J, FIRE OEDT SUPPLIES _S..LB._=,.:
-
113.97
3CHECK TOTAL
�992,2 0 .i4 91_ IM Ay�LKf NNF7!•
1Q9?RLYS�glpfN3:_
4��0�-�_
29922 05/14/00 MAUS/KENNETH
109 OAA SALARY
80.00
_
109.00
RCHECK TOTAL
29923 0 i / I Zi 9 r MIDWEST GAS COMPANY~
115 UTILITIES/CITY HALL
68.52
-29923 06/14/90 MIDWEST GAS•COMPANY
115 UTILITIES/LIBRARY
4.07
-X2992.3 06 14/9Q__M4kldjt GAS COMPANY
115 UTj,1,j WLANjMA�
T
29923 06/14/90 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
115 UTILITIES/SMOP/GARAGE
88.87
f
-29923 06/14/80 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
115 UTILITIES/MUSEUM
28.49
1993 08 14 90_ WREST Gk"Qt�DANY_-_-I5 UTILITIE@/9ENIOR
;-
2992! 06/14/90 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
115 UTILITIES/DARK DEPT
7.99
20923 06/14/90 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
115 UTILITIES/FIRE DEPT
47.88
?74.14,.,.
4CI4ES.t:_.T0?A'.,
J
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTM
--afiL-11;L40-12:A8:22- -----.---•----_._ --- - -'3 `•30uesert;n:.Journal,. .. _ _. ..
(�LRRANT DATE VENOi)R DESCRIPTION -�— nMOLlNT - CLAIM Iove
-`, GENE+aL CHECKT:ji+ - r��
-23924._O6LL4140.Mtt_LtE�'ARLDFJ11Ail1RAL—] 1.8_WAIFi.CRA;T ZE.G _JL20.A0- ,
29925 06/14/90 MONTICELLO PRINTING
137 SIDEWALK SIGNS 46.95
29926 06/14/90 MONTICELLO TIMES
140 KMART LEGAL PUBLICAT
29926 08/14/90 MONTICELLO TIMES
140 COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS 7`9
x .26. 08/_��L90-MON-TIC.,:LLO-TIJ".ES -__ .____LO_6L��NS.P
29926 06/14/90 MONTICELLO TIMES
140 AD FOR CITY HALL MTC 90.00
29926 06/14/90 MONTICELLO TIMES
140 AO FOR MTC WORKER 105.00
_-2992.8_..0_8/_14L90-MQNTIC.ELlA LIMES-- _
_-.L4LO AD EDB-P�tLSOtitlE�HE•� al-8�__. _ �_ -
29926 06/14/90 MONTICELLO TIMES
140 LEGAL NOTICE PUSLICA 51.09
29928 06/14/90 MONTICELLO TIMES
140 JUNK AMNESTY DAY NOTI 268.30
.39926-0.6/_LQ-9CL-OXT LCE.LLO T -MES-._.
_ 140__INFO-=WATER- PRESW..F_L9-80___
1.896.65 *C41ECK TOTA
_-x.9927-06/14/90 MOON MOTOR CelES- iel
t42 --EDM I RPAQTS/DARW inn_on
29927 06/14/90 MOON MOTOR SALES. IN
142 VEHICLE PAPTS/PARKS 1.60
107.60 *CHErK TOTA_
_ 29928 06/14/90 NELSON OIL COMPANY
146 GAS/STREET DEPT - 749.35
-_Z9g7Q eft/14/Oe NOQTMFRN 11YVf.Fe) CGk_147 MICP--cjj2_p.Lj S/FTQF Op_ 19.50
1
19930 05/14/90 NORTHERN STATES POWE
148 UTI'.ITIES/WATER GEP 2.933.43
4,411n MR/If./On NO TMFRN GlAT C QOWF
I A R IITTI TTTF4/SLWER-CEP-T-_LBA.-LB—...- ._---
29030 06/14/90 NORTHERN STATES POWE
140 UTILITIES/STREET LT 3.556.07
29930 06/14/90 NORTHERN STATES POWE
ATATGC OftVG
148 UTILITIES/PARKING LTS 69.59
14R IIT TV TTTFC/DeQW eRDT
9nR9e eR/te/De NeDTMFRN
29930 06/14/90 NORTHERN STATES POWE
148 UTILITIES/MUSEUM 12.20
29930 00/14/90 NORTHERN STATES POWE
140 UTILITIES/SEN CIT 124.01
_---29.93e eR/t4490_NLQTELU ereTFQ DOW,E_-s4$ 11tt1 LTTFe/r vaL_IIEE L2 99
29930 08/14/90 NORTHERN STATES POWE
140 UTILITIES/SHOP/GARAGE 197.00
29930 08/14/90 NORTHERN STATES POWE
140 UTILITIES/FIRE DEPT 102.20
_29530..00UWILD. ACILTREVIL.SIA.T-M SOWE-_—
gDenv eRn 36 _� 04 -� -
29930 00/14/90 NORTHERN STATES POWE
140 UTILITIES/CITY HALL 675.27
0.098.97 AWCHECK TOTA
29931 00/14/90 O'CONNOR/MICHAEL W.
2253 UNION NEGOTIATION FEE 750.00 -
20932 08/_L4190. OLSON &-SONS,ELEC.IRj
.._..1.00 -CONST COSI/WA.TER OR! .2515-00 --. -,�-- -
29932 00/14/90 OLSON A SONS ELECTRI
ISO, MISC PARTS/WATER DEPT 20.07
29932 00/14/90 OLSON 8 SONS ELCCTRI
100 MISC MTC SUPP/WATER 0 204.41
_�.. __._._..�__, .._�..�.-_ _
_ .. _-_... -- -•- •---1_..202-.00 . _ !CHEP9 TOTA
29933 06/14/90 OLSON. USSET.AGAN a
292 OAA LEGAL FEES 4,016.11
29934 00/14/90 OUELETTE/LLOVO
.90052 RECYCLING PRIZE 75.00
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
_ yO.GL+J44_2,9���2__.:-_.�.=, _.r -.-. _ •-• � -, _ o;3wrsaaent_d'ouenal_.---- •--y--•
WARRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIS ?zNl
GENERAL CHECKING ��_�-Y �_._ •,_-��1
1
2393.5�06JS4/9A-PESl1S.LIFE ._..•_-_2.74 L.IE.E..I[i'.._RRECIUM-__ 36..OD.__�..
29936
06/14/90
PLUMBERV-PURCELL'S P
2S1
MTC SUPPLY/PARKS
3.07
29937
06/14/90
POLKA DOT RECYCLING
170
RECYCLING CONTRACT
1.187.82
_ _2993§
O6J14/90
PRc!7§,SECLEeNI G 5__
17�_�LEAN-ING_
SFR F-kfiE_MjiLL_$� _00 _
29938
06/14/90
PREUSSE'S CLEANING S
173
CLEANING SER/CITY HAL 400.00
450.00 -CHECK
TOT:
29939
06/14/90
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIE
174
INSU9AN':7 PP£MIUM
937.52
?9939
08/14/90
PRINCIPAL MUTVA: LIF
174
INSURANCE PfIEMIUM
1.242.3?
29939_06/14/9Q..FRINrIPAL
MUTyAI_1_IP
774
1NSQr%ANy,E PPEMI!LM_.f
-9.07,
29939
08%14%90
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF
174
INSURANCE PREMIUM
158.03
29939
06/14/90
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF
174
INSURANCE PREMIUM
158.03
• _ 29939 08 14/90
PRINCL;AL MUTUA�LIF
t7�
INSUR_ANC_E OREMIUM
35.11
29939
06/14/90
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF
174
INSURANCE PREMIUM
158.03
29939
06/14/90
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF
174
INSURANCE PREMIUM
869.82
29939
0®/14/90
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF _
174_INSURANCF_
PP£MIUM
_ 91.10
29839
08/_14/90
PW-UT
PRINCIPALUAL LIF
174_
M INSURANCE PREMIU
197.74
29939
06/14/90
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF
174
INSURANCE PREMIUM
483.51
_ 29939
06/14/90
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF
1?4
INSURANCE PREMIUM
368.75
29939
06%1090
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF
174
INSURANCE PREMIUM
1.020.92
29939
06/14/90
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF
174
INSURANCE PREMIUM
132.36
39939
9§/16 90
PRINCIP-A1 MUTUAL L[F
174
-INSURANCE PREMIUM
_
29939
06/14/90
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF
174
INSURANCE PREMIUM
4.92
29939
06/14/80
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF
174
INSURANCE PREMIUM
147.39
- 29930
QQ/ L4LQQ
PRjNgjQAL MUTUAL LIF
174
jH$51RANC� pRfMjUM 67.09
29939
08/14/80
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF
174
INSURANCE PREMIUM
91.10
29939
06/14/90
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF
174
INSURANCE PREMIUM
42.07
7.OQ�a��MFiKQT.
29940
06/IA/90
SAL4OWSKI/THOMAS
297
OAA SALARY
260.00
__2A940.,,06
14J90 4KOW_SKI/T4CrAS
2�3Q�A_I EAOFs1�PENSE
t�3--
269.13 OCHECK
TOT,
2.�9A1_06/14/90
SAL_2�PQEy/P11r.TY
1tLk [Im �ONTROL CONTRA_
135
29942
06/14/90
SCHERER SANITATION
166
LATRINE RENTAL
62.00
- 29943
06/ i4 %90
SCHLUENG'sR CONSTRUCT
187
REPLACE SIDEWALK
125.00-�
06/14/90_SMIT_M
&MAYEj___,____
__29944
} 29944
O6/1b/90
SMITH i HAVES
194
LEGAL SERVICES/SEWER
32.00
29844
06/14/90
SMITH & HAVES
194
LEGAL SERV/KMART
230.50
-ULk-"9&L
MRYLT.APPIR
t52-114 _-.._
..._
29944
06/14/90
SMITH & HAVES
194
LEGAL SERV/REMMELE
150.00
1.422.60 6CHECK
TOT
?•%iC FINANCIAL SYSTIM
_06/.1.4/9D._ 12:06:12__ _-
._ . •. _ ___ Di3our3esent Journal,,
�rRANT RATS VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT CLAIM INVC.
,ENF_RAL r:HEC(INg •-- ----`------
---•----•------•---.
.. _._.r. ----
._29944�fiLL4.l3d�flA2..!1k_T9OL5 :.ORP,03_____1S5_i4.Ql `1S.TSEEL�E�T 193.14--_-_�__
29946 06/14/90 ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT
289 CLEANING SUP/LIBRARY 38.00
29947 06/14/90 STATE CAPITOL CREDIT
190 PAYROLL OEOUCTION
30.04
-_ 29348-0,BL-4190 J AM CbJOJ CE_
__22.8._8AS.f_SI-eARICS
__ - .
29949 06/14/90 UNITOG RENTAL SERVIC
211 PAYROLL DEDUCTION
6.40
---299.49-DBLL4L"-MNIXOG.RENTAL SERVIC._-_.21_1-UklEORM R.ER Al
29949 06/14/90 UNITOG RENTAL SERVIC
?11 UNIFORM RENTAL
54.00
29949 06/14/90 UNITOG RENTAL SERVIC
211 UNIFORM RCNTAL
12.72
_29949. 0.6/14/.$0 At1LTOG. REt1TAL--!ERVIC.—
—3-43
29949 06/14/90 UNITOG RENTAL SERVIC
211 UNIFORM RENTAL
9.44
29949 06/14/90 UNITOG RENTAL SERVIC
211 UNIFORM RENTAL
24.89
130-41 ---ACHECKJOTAL
29950 06/14/90 UNOCAL
213 GAS/WATER DEPT
11.69
915_0_.Q Gj L41 9 1) UN9CAl._. — ._-_ _213_ GPS(FjRF.-OE2T__._
__-8-.61 -.. _ _
20.36 *CHECK TOTAL
29051 O LjAL90_Y_RTr:MT Cf111N-UnU=_?1
TAX INC CERT/MA!2TIESsn-nn-_•
-/TAPPER
-__
29951 06/14/90 WRIGHT COUNTY AUOITO
219 TAX, INC CER
50.00
'951 06/14/90 WRIGHT COUNTY AUOITO
219 SHERIFF'S CONTRACT
12.506.71
-
1e 898.71 ■cHECk.LOIwL
29852 05/14/60 Y.M.C.A. OF MINNEAPO
224 YMCA CONTRACT
625.00
GENERAL CHECKING
TOTAL
52.401.67
r
o
e
��F TNgNGI
AI
-
L. r
.. rn..
�e.r. e,
Aisrnraenian
t=dl f�nrnAl
o
-S'/,STEM
-WAR'RANT
O-A,TE, VEN{00?
AM711p!f
CLAIM INVnt
4IOUOR FUND
!,
_ jC.%?1=-
j3- IiLALi.
'80012
TAYAP.OF MTV -
1h nl-
° d�
15133
05/31/90 EAGLE WINE COMPANY
800012
WINE PURCHASE
597.30
67 1,.32
•CHECK `TOTAL
15134
05/31/90 PHILLIPS & SONS CO/E
800037
LIQUOR PURCHASE
642.06
15134
05/31/90 PHILLIPS & SONS CO/E
600037
WINE PURCHASE
459.37
_
I- in -&I
■rHFJ K Tmrm 0
15135
05/31/90 JOHNSON EROS WHOLESA
8000?2
WINE PURCHASE
-C
217,.08
1 1 n C A r.
1.322.52
'CHECK TOTAL_
,S1ta
05/3-1/80 r2IGGS COILED A rnM
800.n1N
1Tn11fl0 C111ArMASF
'_dnn_in
LIQUOR FUNO
TOTAL.
6.593.37
r
o
e
.5
vJ
i
BPC.FIINANCIAL
SYSTEM
WARRANT
DATE
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
CLAIM INVO-
1.I0UOR FUNr1
_ .5.7+
e��ai�n
.,.,.,..c Seng• LOL.n
90000
eno oue•-one:
artf 1a
15138
06/06/90
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
800002
TELCPHONE CHARGES
80.27
15135
06/06/90
CITY OF MONTICELLO
300003
SEtic`f/WATER BILL
28.09
r
06901% 40
n T/
M �; C i I 1 •): 1 f ::
S i
I
--.-i•
15141
06/06/90
COMMISSIONER OF REVE
800006
MAY SALES TAX DUE
9.059.29
15142
06/06/90
DAHLHEIM?? OISTRIBUT
900009
OQANGc •J-JI-:F, MIX
79.75
15142
06/06/90
OAI-LHEIMER OISTRIBUT
800009
BEE? P!1C.CHASE
17.857.25
11.1+1.OQ
♦fH�'k 7,}T41._
15143
06/06/90
DAY DISTRIBUTING COM
800010
BEER PURCHASE
511.20
15144
06/06/90
DICK BEVERAGE :C-M,-'AN
900011
OPERATING SLtPPLI@S
45.50
15144
06/06/90
DICK BEVERAGE COMoAN
900011
BEER PURCHASE
1.173.00
1.,)tA 4n
tf NO-Ic
15145
06/06/90
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
800012
WINE PURCHASE
356.70
—4514$_p 6LG8�p0
EA649—W E_COMRANY_,_800011
fnlrc A MTS[—MTV
fg%-5.1
492.27
'CHECK TOTAL
t-5148_08/-06{00-G1AS3-HUTJTt1E-8000.49J10LLLSL_F_RONF
nn.noe
aS nn
I
'15147
06/08/90
GRIGGS. COOPER & COM
800018
LIQUOR PURCHASE-
5.480.64
l
15147
•06/06/90
GRIGGS...-COOPER & CCM
800018
MARGARITA MIX—
—548-72—T-
6.029.43
•CwECK TOtah
...3.514.8..08L.C6L90�¢OSSLEiN_BE
.E34GE..L�8D00_1,8_ssIi:__.LtILE_�
1a 9�
15148
05/06/90
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE I
800019
MUGS/COOLERS FOR SALE
111.00
15148
06/05/90
GRCISSLEIN BEVERAGE 1800019
MISC OPERATING SUP
42.30
-15148
06406/90
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE I.
8000A9-6Ec.2..PU-
-EILJ.A..60__,.
21.397.65
SCHECK T^TAA
in..wrIN Seng W.n1 eea
ennna.)
w-lig oilarl}Act
1 Sna aQ
15150
05/06/90
JUDE CANDY JI TOBACCO
800021
CIGARETTES/CIGARS
543.06
,_151.44
`' S IQIACCO..SOOAZ1
BAG 1_biAS[t+Rg
V.0-1A
—
953.42
04:HECIf T-)r
Snnnef
GAlSnaL—SLt re
A. Ln
1S1S2
06/06/90
KRWC RAO.IO STATTCN
600024
AOY.RTISING
96.00
15153
06/05/90
L 'IN" R SERVICES
300025
RE'�AIQ 0008 LATCHES
96.60
-
ARG,' FINAt1CIAL
SYSTEM
t
,WARRANT
GATE
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
CLAIM 'INVOik,
L-TOUOR FUND
15155
00/06/90
MADS =OROS
900027
SUPO1_IES
15.77
i5i.56
08/05/'30
MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
80.1024
UTILITIES/`!EATING,
24.71
"-'.t44-57-{16 0"6=Ti-kgN�sG-'tk-4q-ZL".=
3nnn1n
.nvrcnr-crc:r.
9!,l fin
15158
06/06/90
NORTHERN STATES POWE
$00035
UTILITIES/ELECTRIC
758.51
15159
06/06/90
PERSIAN'S BUSINESS E
800097
REPAIR CALCULAT,3R
55.69
i
'
E'
RD0039
EmP' JuE,£ op . V:.
EMPLOYERS PERA WH
104.16
i+
15160
06/06/90
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET
800039
-
202.51
*CHECK TOTAL 1
`,15161
06/06/90
QUALITY WINE $ SPIRI
800040
LIOUOR PURCHASE
1.11?..30
'S1
06708/90
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI
900040
MINE PURCHASE
2?1.43
t OTt 7i
..r 14E!'Y TAT, .
:1,062
06/06/90
ROWS ICE COMPANY
800041
ICE PURCHASE
609.50
VS103-
06/08/90
$EN„TRV SVSrEMS. INC'.,
•900086
CHECK ALARM SYS.T,EM
:-t3a8t•
•Ob WB/>SO_SEVBetaLLP gpT2`i.StJG-C4-80IIDW-P.O.o o��orw.ee
tL_Sp
151,85'
08/08/90.$T.
CLGUD RESTAURANT
900045
BEER MUGS/GLASSES,
184;$7
i5,15'9'
48'106/90-
ST”. "CL±O40 RfgzAURANT-500048
.,7U.ICE
"130:77. ":#CHECK
TOT.Ai.
`.n+13.1.1313;•060$./.00,SSA7.f�.rw"LLt7i'r`4cntr
ennn/:e
neVDAi rndnyrT"r: ;uD4n
nn',.
-
'9'187,08'-/00L90'SUP.ERIOR'PROOgCTS
800046
PICNIC PlMP4
490.34
16)88
08,/08/00
YMCRoE' 0I3TRIBUTING
$00048
$%E'P PURCHASE
rn
20.207,.96
15'1.7-0
08/08/90
VIKING COCA-COLA BOT
900051
PDP PURCHASE
a', an
533.70
16'17.1
06/06/90
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
900052
EMPLOYEE FICA WH
177.88
1$171
00/00/90
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
800052
EMPLOYERS FICA WH
177.89
n a
19171
08/08/90
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
800052
EMPLOYEE MEDICARE WM 8.15
71
06/06/90
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
800052
EMPLOYERS MEDICARE
WM 5.15
•IA R.
�l`y1Air !+
15'17:
06/06/90
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
80"054
MEOICAL SUPPLIES
40.25
lh 110 FUNO
TOT 1L
86.352.EP,
BRC P _NANCTAL SYST',-
.f0.8Gt417t]—L2t0.3s.L3�...__._— -- -• -_--_—
----..sS�aues,s�•in* Juu�a�1.__----..
;
• WARRANT DATE VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT CI-AIM
LIOUOR FUND
—_1S17_3__0e/1G/Qn rCM4TSZJ-DWLF QE+kVj.E BD.p006—i/2�SLLUi% �RLFe
S-n4$24_- _-
15174 06/14/90 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 800017
WINE PURCHASE
480.07
_ Ui74 nA/14/90 EAGLE WTHF COMPANY Rene 17
1Y000R PURCHASF
La-IQ
'
524.16 ACHECK
TOTA
___1i1.L5_O.BLL4L9.0_G.RI3Si��J:04PFR_$.t9`�LBO.00_19yir?u�R
DIIRCtleS.E-L.O.LV_.24— --�-.-
IS176 06/14/90 KMOM RAOIO STATION 800060
ADVERTISING
120.00
15177 06/14/90 O'HARA SPOS. COMPANI 300053
COOLER/LIaHTERS/MTSC 314.00
_i5t2�d5/14.L903EfiA 1LIEE-CNBC—.�iSZSURA.1rc
o op___ ..--
15179 06/14/90 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF 800033
INSURANCE PREMIUM
718.75
—Ig]•7_q__CL6Lj& _qD _PRTNCTPAI MIITUAL 1 IF
MT 11M
1nA.Rn
827.35
_ �L@R�5L.L4130�LIZ'�4S.dF ��?L4,I._B.OOSL•2_1!JLCP_1�40N,JY.LC�1___II.0.5_---
. -
—.- -
15180 06/14/90 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 800040
WINE PURCHASE
1.301.09
15180 06/14/90 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 800040
LIQUOR PURCHASE_
628.48
1 .Q7Q.R7 *rMF" K-..LOIA,
15101 06/14/70 STATE CAPITOL CREDIT 800044
PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS
250.00
I_
LIQUOR FUND
TOTAL
16.097.11