City Council Agenda Packet 08-27-1990 (2)AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
l Monday, August 27, 1990 - 7:00 p.m.
Mayor: Ken Maus
Council Members: Fran Fair, Warren Smith, Shirley Anderson,
Dan Blonigen
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held August 13,
1990. () SPr
3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints.
4. Consideration of Council proclamation proclaiming
September 9-15 as Local Cable Programming Week.
5. Consideration of resolution approving plans and specifications
and authorizing advertisement for bids for the extension of
utilities to the Sandberg East development.
6. Review of bids for garbage/refuse collection and hauling.
7. Consideration of ratifying union contract renewal.
B. Consideration of resolution adopting a proposed preliminary
1991 budget and setting a proposed tax levy.
9. Consideration of resolution approving 1991 MN DOT transit
assistance application.
10. Consideration of authorizing Monticello Heartland Express
(MHE) to begin service 1.5 hours earlier on a pilot program
basis.
11. Consideration of review and approval of Right of First Refusal
Agreement between the City of Monticello and the H -Window
Company.
12. Consideration of counter-offer on purchase agreement for
propurty adjacent to city hall.
13. Consideration of garbago/refuse ordinance amendment.
14. Consideration of bills for the month of August.
15. Adjournment.
i,
MINUTES
` REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, August 13, 1990 - 7:00 p.m.
Members Present: Ken Maus, Fran Fair, Warren Smith, Shirley
Anderson, Dan Blonigen
Members Absent: None
Approval of minutes.
Motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Dan Blonigen,
and unanimously carried to approve the minutes of the regular
meeting held July 23, 1990.
Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints.
Public Works Director, John Simola, submitted a petition from
the homeowners along the north side of West Broadway between
Minnesota and Maple Streets requesting to be added to the
current City of Monticello sidewalk grid system. The block in
question is adjacent to the City's sidewalk grid system; and
upon petition by 1008 of the property ownors, the Council can
add this section to the grid system.
The Council discussed establishing a cut-off date for future
petitions, and it was suggested that August 18 be established
as the cut-off date to coincide with the City's planned
sidewalk improvements. Future petitions to be included in the
sidewalk grid system after this date would be considered for
1991 only.
Motion was made by Warren Smith, seconded by Fran Fair, and
unanimously carried to include the sidewalk system between
Minnesota Street and Maple Streets along the north side of
West Broadway as part of the current grid system.
Public hearinq and consideration to adopt a resolution
relatinq to modification of the tax increment finance plan
relatinq to Tax Increment Finance District No. 1-9 (Tappers,
Inc.
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority had recently approved
modifying the tax increment finance plan for District No. 1-9
which increased the direct tax increment financing assistance
to Tapper s, Inc., by the amount of $12,000. This additional
direct assistance was required becaueo of the necessity to
9
Council Minutes - 8/13/90
meet the Small Business Administration loan guidelines. The
$12,000 proposed through TIF assistance resulted in the GMEF
loan being reduced by $12,000 to $88,000 from the original
$100,000 loan request.
The public hearing was opened, and no written or oral comments
were received.
Motion was then made by Warren Smith, seconded by Fran Fair,
and unanimously carried to adopt the resolution approving the
modification of the tax increment finance plan relating to TIF
District No. 1-9 (Tapper's, Inc.). SEE RESOLUTION 90-28.
Consideration of a variance request to allow no hard surfacinq
in a loadinq berth accessway. ADplie ant, Martie's Farm
Service.
Martie's Farm Service requested a variance from the hard
surfacing requirements for a portion of his loading/unloading
dock area. Mr. Martie proposed to surface the area in class 5
or crushed rock, as he indicated the area would be used only
occasionally by larger semi's and trucks .
The Council discussed whether this occasional use would
qualify as a hardship for granting a variance, and concerns
were expressed about a precedent being set since this appeared
to only be an economic hardship and not related to the
physical characteristics of the property.
After further discussion, motion was made by Warren Smith,
seconded by Shirley Anderson, to deny the variance request, as
the applicant did not demonstrate a hardship other than
economic. Voting in favor: Ken Maus, Fran Fair, Shirley
Anderson, Warren Smith. Opposed: Dan B lonigen.
5A. Consideration of a conditional use permit to allow a reduction
in parkinq lot desiqn requirements.
Recently, an ordinance amendment was adopted that allowed for
reduction in driveway and parking lot design requirements to
be considered for industrial zoned property. Mr. Russ Martie,
owner of Martio's Farm Service, requested a conditional use
permit to allow for a portion of his drive areas at the rear
of his property to be exempted from the general curbing and
blacktopping requirements, as they were secondary in nature
and not used by the general public. As part of the
conditional use permit request, the Planning Commission had
tCouncil Minutes - 8/13/90
recently approved the reduction in design requirements
contingent upon Mr. Martie completing 12 requirements relating
to his development.
Council reviewed the items with Mr. Martie, and a motion was
made by Fran Fair, seconded by Shirley Anderson, and
unanimously carried to approve the conditional use request
allowing for a reduction in the parking lot design
requirements with the following conditions:
1. The drainage plan shall be completed, submitted to
the Consulting Engineer, and written approval shall
be received from the Consulting City Engineer.
2. A concrete drainage swale/surmountable curb shall
be installed from the existing curb in the
southwest corner of the loading/unloading area
easterly to the center of the drainage swale ditch.
3. The curbing along the easterly portion of the
parking lot shall be extended southerly and
terminated at the top of the drainage swale.
4. In the drainage swale ditch area where a semi -truck
tractor will be maneuvering, the drainage swale
ditch from 10 feet each way of the center is to be
a concrete surface.
5. The remainder of the drainage swale ditch from the
end of the northeasterly hard surfacing
northeasterly to the northeast property line shall
have installed a sodded surface from the center of
the ditch to top of the slopes.
6. Gates shall be installed near the southerly portion
of the loading/unloading dock area and near the
southwest corner of the open, roof -covered, outdoor
etorago area. Gates are to remain closed at all
times except when they are being used to maneuver
vehicles through them.
7. In the two areas where the gates are to be
installed, the first area near the southwest corner
of the open, roof-coverod, outdoor storage area,
shall have a fence installed similar to the
existing fence from the southwest corner of the
building to the gate and from the gate westerly to
the end of the southwest curb. In the area of the
gate on the south portion of the loading/unloading
9
Council Minutes - 8/13/90
area, a fence shall be installed from the gate
easterly near the southeast corner of the semi -
truck tractor maneuvering area, thence northerly
along the east property line to a point where the
northeast corner of the turning area would be
completed, thence angling northwesterly to the top
of the drainage swale.
8. In the area from the southwest corner of the open,
roof -covered storage area to the southwest corner
of the building, this area shall be regraded so the
water run-off will flow to the westerly ditch. The
green area in this area will be extended to allow a
12 -foot gravel surface driveway to run through
this.
9. The entire parking lot area shall be striped to
show where existing parking is to take place.
10. The landscaping shall be completed, the minimum
number of over -story trees shall be planted, and
the green areas shall be installed as per plan,
with the area in front of the overhead doors not
exceeding 50 feet easterly from the front of the
overhead doors. The balance of the area east of
there is to be a green area.
11. Screening in front of the open, roof -covered
storage area located near the westerly curb area
shall be a combination of the minimum sized
coniferous and hardwood deciduous trees to achieve
partial opacity.
12. The conditions shall be completed by October 1,
1990. If not completed, the letter of credit that
is held in escrow at the present time will be used
to complete any of the items that are not
completed.
Consideration of resolution awardinq bids for Project 90SW-1,
repair and replacement of hazardous sidewalk.,
Public Works Director, John Simola, informed the Council that
the City received four bids for the replacement of
approximately 10,000 sq ft of 4 -inch and 6 -inch concrete
sidewalk and appurtenant work. The bids received were as
follows:
9
Council Minutes - 8/13/90
Witco, Inc. $21,725.00
Bruce Dalbec Const., Inc. $22,437.50
DNCON, Inc. $26,009.30
HCH Construction $26,067.50
References were checked on the low bidder, Witco, Inc., and it
was recommended that the contract be awarded to the low
bidder.
Motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Warren Smith, and
unanimously carried to adopt the resolution awarding the bid
to Witco, Inc., In the amount of $21,725.00 for
Project 90SW-1. SEE RESOLUTION 90-29.
Consideration of transient merchant ordinance amendments.
Administrator Wolfsteller reviewed with the Council the City's
present transient merchant ordinance and recommendations for
Improvements to the ordinance. It was noted that Monticello's
ordinance currently covers only transient merchants; but the
ordinance could be amended to also include peddlers and
solicitors who go door to door taking orders or selling
merchandise. It was noted that peddlers and solicitors do not
appear to be a problem for Monticello, and the Council
centered its discussion only on transient merchant activities.
The amendments suggested by the Administrator included
clarifying that a transient merchant has to conduct activities
on private property and receive written permission of the
property owner prior to obtaining a permit. In addition, a
transient merchant license would only be issued for a location
where parking was available for customers and where it would
not interfere with normal traffic flow.
Currently, all transient merchants are required to obtain a
license and pay a $50 per day fee, and the Council discussed
whether a special exemption should be established for
merchants selling farm and/or garden produce, vegetables, and
fruits. It was noted that it is difficult for the City to
establish an ordinance that allows local residents to be
exempt from the foo but charge a fee for out-of-town people.
Council then discussed establishing a lower daily foe for the
selling of farm and garden produce during a specific time
period each year.
As a result, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded
by Dan Blonigon, and unanimously carried to adopt the
ordinance amendment clarifying that transient merchants must
obtain written permission from the property owner \and be
lI'
Council Minutes - 8/13/90
located in an area that does not cause traffic problems/and Eo A c
exempt the sale of garden and farm fruits and vegetables for b
the period from July 15 to October 15 from the requirements of
the ordinance except for certain provisions and a $10 per day
permit fee. SEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 194.
8. Request for clarification of conditional use permit
requirements - -Riverroad Carwash.
As part of the conditional use permit granted to Ken Schwartz
and Dean Hoglund to build a carwash near the Riverroad Plaza
convenie nce store, the building structure had to
architecturally be similar to the existing buildings in the
surrounding area as to not cause impairment in property
values. The developers had indicated they would be painting
their carwash to match the Riverroad Plaza complex and now
requested permission to only seal the block structure rather
than pal nt.
The Planning Commission did not object to the request, as they
felt the architectural appearance of the building did coincide
with the surrounding property.
Motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Shirley Anderson,
and unanimously carried approving the request by the
developers to seal the block carwash building and that the
property does architecturally appear similar to the
surrounding properties.
Consideration of approvina preliminary plat--Sandberq East
Second Addition.
The original Sandberg East plat, which was approved when the
property was within the OAA area, consisted of 18 half -acre
lots that were 80 feet in width and approximately 270 feet
deep. with the City conducting a feasibility study on
extending sower and water to this development, Mr. Sandberg
has presented a preliminary plat redesigning the original 18
lots lnto 17 parcels to be known as the Sandberg East Second
Addition. The replat would remove approximately 70 feet of
depth from each lot, eliminate one road access to the outlet,
and widen out the remaining parcels fronting on Gillard
Avenue.
Motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Dan Blonigen,
and unanimously carried to approve tno preliminary plat as
presented.
0
Council Minutes - 8/13190
10. Consideration of approvinq revised feasibility report and
finance pian for the extension of utilities to the Sandberq
East development.
At the June 25 Council meeting, approval was given for
developing plans and specifications for the extension of
utilities through Mr. Robert Krautbauer's property and Mr. Rod
Norell's property (outlet A of Sandberg East) to service the
platted Sandberg East lots along Giilard Avenue. Since that
time, Mr. Krautbauer has withdrawn his support of the
utilities being extended through his property, and a revised
feasibility study indicates that the project could be extended
along East County Road 39 to the intersection of Gillard
Avenue and County Road 39 and then southerly to service the
Sandberg East plat.
The cost of the project had dropped from approximately
$295,000 to $229,000 using this County Road 39 route. A
finance plan was presented by the staff outlining the cost
that could be assessable to the benefiting property owners
along the route. In order to obtain a firm cost, it was
recommended that the project be advertised for bids returnable
September 14, and a public hearing on the Improvement project
with the possibility of awarding bids could be held on
September 17 to allow for construction yet this fall.
Motion was made by Fran Fair, seconded by Shirley Anderson,
and unanimously carried to authorize the City Engineer, OSM,
to continue with the preparation of plans and specifications
for the new route along East County Road 39 and authorize the
staff to review the plans prior to the advertisement for bids
scheduled for Friday, August 24. The completed plans would be
reviewed by the Council on August 27 for final approval.
SEE RESOLUTION 90-30.
11. Consideration of appointinq fudges for the 1990 primary and
general elections.
Motion was made by warren Smith, seconded by Shirley Anderson,
and unanimously carried to appoint the following individuals
as election judges for the upcoming primary and general
elections:
Walter Lusti Kevin Tvodt
Robert Nelson Rosemary Dahl
Cynthia Hamond Kay Gauthier
Shirley Maus Jeanette Host
Mary Bray Betty Lund
9
I -
Council Minutes - 8/13/90
Robert Rohland Joanne Link
Gloria Gasser Florence Mayer
Lucille Clausen Leona Kline
Rita Soltau
12. Consideration of purchase of Plavoround equipment for Laurinq
Lane Park and Balboul Park.
Motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Dan Blonigen,
and unanimously carried to authorize the purchase of
playground equipment for Lauring Lane and Balboul Parks from
E.F. Anderson in the amount of $7,684.
13. Consideration of the purchase of a used Vac -All.
Recently, the public works department became aware through an
equipment dealer that a 13 -yard used Vac -All would be
available from the City of Worthington. The City staff had
recently investigated the cost of a new combination sewer jet
and vacuum machine and found the prices for a new unit would
be in the neighborhood of $140,000 to $150,000. The used
machine was inspected by the Water Superintendent and Public
Works Director and was found to be in reasonable condition.
The equipment dealer had discounted the unit to a prico of
$14,900, and it was recommended by the Public Works Director
that the City purchase this equipment which would have an
additional life of 3-5 years.
Motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Dan Blonigen,
and unanimously carried to authorize the purchase of the Vac -
All from the City of Worthington through Boyum Equipment in
the amount of $14,900.
14. Consideration of Durchasinq property adjacent to city hall.
In June, the Council was made aware that a parcel of land
within the city hall block adjacent to and abutting our
present city hall property was available for sale. The
122 X 165 -foot parcel abutted Third Street on the south and
the city hall property to the north.
The Wright County State Bank, owner of the property, obtained
an appraisal estimating the value of the property at $59,000.
The Council discussed the merits of acquiring additional land
adjacent to the city hall property to allow for future
expansion at this time. Concerns were expressed by Council
members over whether there was any advantage by the City in
acquiring this property now that it was available if the need
may not be there for up to ton years.
92
Council Minutes - 8/13/90
After considerable discussion on the purchase, a motion was
made by Warren Smith, seconded by Shirley Anderson, an
unanimously carried to authorize the staff to prepare a
purchase agreement offering $50,000 for the property.
15. Consideration of rentinq out a portion of the old fire hall,
buildinq.
The City was again recently approached by an individual
interested in renting out a portion of the former fire hall
property for use as a small assembly/manufacturing business.
The City Council in the past has indicated a desire to sell
the property but not get into the leasing/renting of the
property. Council was informed that the public works
department has been utilizing the building for storage of
various equipment and supplies and noted that if the building
was rented, the department may have difficulty in finding
adequate storage space.
As a result, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded
by Dan Blonigen, and unanimously carried to continue offering
the property for sale but to not consider future requests for
leasing or renting of the facility unless it was in
conjunction with an offer to purchase in the future.
.Rick Wolfstpller
City AdminY trator
9
Council Agenda - 8/27/90
Consideration of Council proclamation proclaiming
September 9-15 as Local Cable Proqramminq Week. (R.W.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Jones Intercable, Inc., the City's cable franchise company,
has requested that the Mayor proclaim the week of
September 9-15 as Local Cable Programming Week.
Jones Intercable currently has an average of 60 hours of local
programming each week on seven local cable channels. In
addition to providing coverage of Monticello High School
football and basketball teams, Jones also provides coverage of
the Wright County Board of Commissioner meetings with local
programming available for the cities to use to broadcast
political debates and, of course, Council meetings.
Jones Intercable is requesting the attached proclamation be
adopted by the City Council supporting the local cable
programming efforts to keep Monticello citizens informed.
If the Council does not have a problem with the proclamation,
the suggested format of the proclamation could be read by the
i Mayor and formally adopted by the Council.
L D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of proclamation.
C
ti° 'tif'° ° "j — `— — 1I1 1I1 '1J
°
II n
c
r WHEitFAS, 1 ,c.9': cA61, i pra rnm.ning 9ri:nyr. =rtir' r:o.,ri:;ni ty_'
ical eaueatiori:,I-'cC?Iti'ra'i_',-spor;c^'aha Jnr+r a`i evancs ^n`-- -
television;; and
.JiHFaEAS, 'local cable programming -is oroducen in crn_ur.c::io_n .tti
a variety of r_ommuni.cy group;, including AARo, tno Humans
of 'sigh'. CoJnty, and' C4AI.C; and
WHEREAS, 2SC hours of 'Inr.A'I cable orcgranming are CA1b.Z2cAst r.... -r
month; and
'AHEkEAS. Jones integrable, Tot. iP making it pnsvihl"e for :pis
community service to be drought to Monticello; anc
WHFRF_AS. SAC familiev in Mnnticello are, served by Jones
Intercable, Inc.; nnri o
WHEREAS the partnars in local cable programming are to he o
rommanriad for thei- efforts to kanp r.itirnns in Mantic-illo 0
informed, onlightenod and entertained.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE ST RCGCLVE0, that i, Nen Mair., Mayor of ,trri
I'r City of Mnntieel,lo, do, 6reby pror_-lalm Seprembwr 9-75 Loral Canle
Proo rnmming Wnni--
r
0
0
Kan MAUL
City of Monticello
250 E BrOAdWAy
Monticello, MN S53G2
OeAr Mayor Maus:
We at Jones TntercAhle, Inc. drp. re lehrat'ing Loral C;tble
Programming Wpek, Spptemhrr 9 -IS. Ourinct urm rhrne And A half
year' service to Monticello, We havp strivr%d t:n provicip 'lor.a'I
interest Programming to the rommuniry. Wa rur•r-ontly Air an
mvernge of 60 hours of 1nr.Al programming nnch wppl< on snven 'Inr.al
rAble channels.
For instance, in the past year wp h.avp providnrd enverAgp of
Monticello high sr.hool fnothA'II and bnvkf-rhm'I'I roams. We nrovidr
similar service to the other 12 r_itins wo- -R .rvn, with rnvorage of
the Wright County BoArd of Commissinnars mrntings on Chnnnal 0,
sr.hnnl hriArd eAndidAtps debAr.en hnt:h in i.Ik River And IAnnticp'l ln,
and tho sheriff/rounty Attorney r.Anrl i d 1:1:�z' rJnbAnra to Wright
County.
In addition r.o our covnragp of lnrn'l gnvprnmpnt, we work
With A vAriet•y of groups within the rommuniry, strr.h As thn Huminn
Cimript.y, the r_ntrnty Histnrir_nl Socinty, and AAIiP to look At
Specific ideas And issuos. And to help our-❑rhnnl kidr., wet have
provided chnnnnls frit- int.ni-nntivn tpnr.hing hurwpnn sr.honl
districts.
We ntrnng'ly fpnl thAt: nmrr, of rhe prnmisn of r.91711p
to'Invision is to rnanond to the nnnds of r:nmmunfty. WO Aro
plens+od And prnud r.n lip Ahlp to lowli Ignnt:irelln nwar•o of whAt.'s
hmpppning in govnrnmont, As well as matins Anri
special pvenCs t:hrrntgh Mill- lor.A'1 ern{Ir•Atn nifrvings.
1'0 MAkn you A part of the I,n1:AI (Ah In PrngrAmm'ing wank
r_elonrwtinn, I've enr'Incprl A MAynrAl I+rrnelAmAt inn th;rc firmly
pStablishns ynur rir.y An a strong suponr-irnr of r.Abin tolovisinn's
role in the community. T would lip hnnni-mrd if you 'land uq ynur
mupport .
Onro t:hp prnrlmmAr•inn has harm wirir-•d t:n ynur r.iry r.nunni'I'r
AgnndA, plpAtap cnnr.Ar..r me so thmr i r.An ar.hnrlulo snnr7 tol r:nvnrngr,
of the mpnrin.1. And pinAsp frpl fear, t:n nrint.iinv mp if ynrt wenild
1 e mnro infnrmAtion.
S Innr 'I
COAniial Turney
PrngrAm 14h" UP-'
30 first Avonuo N.E., Buffalo, MN 5MI3 812/682.5UO
Council Agenda - 8/27/90
5. Consideration of resolution approving plans and specifications
and authorizing advertisement for bids for the extension of
utilities to the Sandberq East development. (R.19.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At the previous Council meeting, authorization was given to
OSM to continue with the preparation of plans and
specifications for extension of sewer and water along East
County Road 39 to Gillard Avenue south to the Sandberg East
development. OSM has been working on finalizing the plans,
including the necessary field work and soil borings, along
this new route. The City staff has prepared the necessary
easements that would be required from Mr. Krautbauer, Mr. John
Peterson, and Mrs. Joanne Halliger, and has had discussions
with each of the property owners. It is anticipated that the
necessary easements for this project will be obtained prior to
the public Fearing scheduled for September 17.
In order to keep this project on a schedule for this fall, the
plans should be officially approved Monday night by the
Council. The plans were reviewed by the City staff during the
week of August 20, and authorization was given to have the
first advertisement for bids placed in the Construction
Bulletin August 24. This project has to be advertised for
three weeks, and bids will be returnable Friday, September 14,
1990.
The public hearing scheduled for September 17 will allow the
Council and the affected property owners a chance to review
tho actual construction bid prices to determine whether we are
still on schedule with our estimates. If the project is still
feasible at that point, a contract could be awarded that
evening allowing for construction to occur yet this fall. It
is anticipated that a bond sale will be required and could be
authorized that same evening to finance the improvement
project. I have delayed the issuance of two tax increment
bonds that were scheduled for the Remmele and Tapper, Inc.,
projects until the 17th of September to allow for all three
issues to be authorized at the same time.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Adopt the resolution approving the plans and
specifications and authorizing the advertisement for
bids. This will keep the project on schedule and still
allow for construction to occur this fall if the prices
are within our estimates.
L
C,
Council Agenda - 8/27/90
2. Do not approve the plans and specifications. This would
in effect stop the project at this point, which does not
seem feasible If the City Is intending to require the
Sandberg East development to connect to City sewer and
water.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Council adopt a resolution approving
the plans and specifications and advertising for bide. This
project has been discussed, altered a number of ways, and has
reached the point where I believe we need actual bid prices to
proceed with sewer and water for these property owners. I do
not anticipate any difficulty in obtaining the necessary
easements, and I believe the finance plan previously presented
will be reasonable and acceptable to the affected property
owners.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the resolution. Plane and specifications will be
reviewed at the Council meeting by the City Engineer.
RESOLUTION 90 -
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the City Council on
August 13, 1990, Orr-Scholen-Mayeron b Associates, Inc., City
Engineer, has prepared plans and specifications for the improvement
of East County Road 39 and Gillard Avenue with sanitary sewer,
water main, and appurtenant work and has presented such plans and
specifications to the Council for approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications are hereby approved.
2. The City Administrator shall prepare and cause to be
Inserted in the Monticello Times and in the Construction
Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of
such improvement under such approved plans and
specifications. The advertisement shall be published for
21 days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state
that bids will be received by the Administrator until
11:00 a. m. on September 14, 1990, at which time they will
be publicly opened in the Council Chambers of the City
Hall by the City Administrator and Engineer, will then be
tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at
7:00 p.m. on September 17, 1990, in the Council Chambers.
No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with
the Administrator and accompanied by a cash deposit,
cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check payable to
the City of Monticello for 5 percent of the amount of
such bid.
Adopted this 27th day of August, 1990.
City Administrator
C
Mayor
0
Council Agenda - 8/27/90
Rev Sew of bids for garbage/refuse collection and hauling.
(J. S.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The City staff has advertised for bids for garbage/refuse
collection and hauling as directed by the City Council. The
bid opening is to be Monday, August 27, 1990, 2:00 p.m., at
City Hall. We are expecting a good response to the
advertisement, as several contractors have contacted us
regarding the proposed contract. In addition, the City Public
Works Department has been busy preparing a proposal for
automated pickup using the 90 -gallon roll -around containers.
One proposal is being drafted for the City doing all of the
existing single family through tri-plex units with 90 -gallon
containers and doing the apartments utilizing 1-1/2 cubic yard
or 300 -gallon round automated dumpsters. This would also
Include the pickup of all City properties. A second proposal
is being prepared for automated pickup of single family
through tri-plexes using the 90 -gallon containers and the
pickup of all City properties but not the apartments. In this
proposal, we would contract out for the apartments by
negotiating with the two lowest bidders in that area. This
second proposal would require about 3/4 of one individual's
time. The other 1/4 could be spent in the Public Works
Department and gradually used as the town grows or for special
projects such as yard waste pickup or junk amnesty days, etc.
All of the bids will be tabulated and presented at the
meeting, Including a detailed proposal from the City Public
Works Department. This agenda item is for general discussion
of the bids only, and no action is required at this time.
Action can be taken after careful consideration of the bids
and proposals on September 10 or September 24 during which
tim o additional information will be presented regarding the
boat proposals and references of the company, Including
equipment and such.
One thing that should be noted is that at the last Council
moo ting, one member was concerned about the 90 -gallon
containers for use by older residents or single resident
hou soholcls . I have verified that the automated equipment
proposed can handle 60 -gallon containers in addition to the
90 -gallon; and in many instances, the 60 -gallon containers may
be proferred for those homes with low amounts of refuse.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Nona prosontod at this time.
Council Agenda - 8/27/90
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends careful review by the City Council members.
Please call or contact us regarding any facet of any of the
proposals, including the one from the Public Works Department.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
None. All proposals and bids will be presented at the
meeting.
f—
1
ADVANTAGES OF CITY REFUSE SERVICES OVER CONTRACTOR
1. No sales taxes on truck body purchase or other maintenance
parts and supplies.
2. Tires are 30-408 cheaper for the City due to state and federal
programs.
3. Very little additional overhead for City would be needed.
City currently handles all questions and complaints from
residents. City already has computerized billing of garbage
in place if needed. Contractor is a long distance call for
residents.
4. Fuel cost is less, as it is purchased in bulk in existing
system, and the City pays less tax on fuel.
5. The City does not add profit or equipment replacement costs to
current contrast.
6. The City has better control over service and costs.
7. The City could get out of the garbage business almost
overnight at virtually no loss. Used automated pickup garbage
trucks hold their value, are scarce, and, therefore, are sold
quickly.
B. Special services can usually be added for little or no cost.
9. Insurance rates are generally less for a City due to buying
power of the League of Cities.
10. During lights= periods, garbage truck driver would be
available to assist other departments.
11. If the City ever charges a user charge for garbage collection
and disposal, City -provided services would cost individual
residents lees .
12. A possible Joint venture with tho City of Buffalo could lower
costs further.
C
DISADVANTAGES OF CITY REFUSE SERVICES OVER CONTRACTOR
1. City has to arrange and pay for back-up services.
2. Back-up services may not handle catastrophic or long-term
problems in an economical fashion.
3. City may experience slow start up or City may have incorrectly
estimated production.
4. City would have to cross train other public works personnel
for vacation or illness absences.
5. City would have difficulty in hauling extras for residents
(bedsprings, furniture, etc.).
C
4. CITY -OPERATED GARBAGE/REFUSE COLLECTION
I. Ownership Costs
A. 1991 side loader purchase
$106,000
B. 7-1/21 interest b principal 6 yrs.
135,500
C. Less value end 6 yrs.
-25,000
TOTAL
$110,500
Ownership per year
18,417
D. Heated storage 5 mo. @ $235/mo.
1,175
E. Vehicle insurance
800
TOTAL ANNUAL COST
$ 20,392
F. Average productive hours per year
2080 - 208 maint. = 1,872 hrs
$20,392 divided by 1,672 - $ 10.89/hr
II. OPeratinq Excenses (1,872 reg. + 27 OT -
1,899 hrs)
A. Equipment
1. Fuel •
$ 4,175.70
2. Oil s filters
695.95
3. Misc. repairs
1,391.90
4. Brakes and tires
2,087.85
5. Hydraulic system repairs
1,391.90
6. Supplies
1,391.90
7. Backup truck
5,000.00
TOTAL COST REGULAR HOURS
$ 16,135.20
8. Operating exp. for OT hrs,
27 @ $5.95 (excludes backup)
160.65
TOTAL ANNUAL COST
$ 16,295.85
TOTAL REGULAR HOURLY = $16,135.20 divided
by 1,872 = $ 8.62/hr
-NOTE: Fuel costs based upon worst case
found, 1.759 gal/hr. Current
fuel cost is $.90/gal. Use 201
increase to $1.08/gal. plus
another 17.48 cushion.
B. Dumpsters for Misc. City Properties
1. Seven 300 gal. automated dump
units, 7 K 280 = $1,960
$1,960 + 7-1/21 interest, 6 yrs.
$426.10/yr
GARB.BID: 8/17/90 Page 1 of 4
C
C. Salaries and Benefits
1. One full-time employee @ $12.29/hr
ave. 3 years = $ 25,563.00
2. Health ins., FICA, b PERA = 7,580.00
3. Workman's Comp. = 2,664.00
4. Backup personnel, 12 sick days,
6 10 vacation days - 2,303.00
TOTAL LABOR REGULAR HOURS $ 38,110.00/yr
5. OT (leaf pickup), includes benefits 915.84
TOTAL ANNUAL LABOR $ 39,025.84
$38,110 divided by 1,872 (2080 - 208 hrs
maintenance = 1,872 productive hours) _ $20.36/hr
III. Total Costs
A. Total annual cost S 76,139.79
B. Hourly costs = $76,139.79 - $426.10 (dumpsters)
- $1,076.49 (leaf pickup) _ $74,637.20 divided
by 1,872 productive hrs - $39.87/hr
IV. Cost Allocation
A. Single family thru triplex, approx.
1,300 units (once per week).
1. Ave. 650 units per day in 7-1/2 hours
Ave. 2 landfill trips/day 1-1/2 hours
Ave. fuel & cleanup 1/2 hour
2 breaks per day 1/2 hour
10 hours
2. 1,300 units requires two days or
20 hours wk x 52 wks 1,040 hrs
3. 1,040 hrs x $39.87/hr - $41,464.80/yr or $3,455.40/mo.
e. Misc. city parks and properties (twice per week as needed)
1. Seven 300 -gal., four 90 -gal, and six 30 -gal.
2 hrs. each time + 1/4 hr. break + 3/4 hr. landfill
3 hrs. x twice - 6 hrs per week.
6 hrs x 52 wks - 312 hrs/yr x $39.87 a $12,439.44/yr
divided by 12 - $1,036.62/mo.
2. Dumpsters for automated pickup
$426.10/yr divided by 12 - $35.51/mo.
GARB.BID: 8/17/90 Page 2 of 4
C.
3. Three leaf pickups per year (Saturdays at overtime)
27 hrs x $39.87• _ $1,076.49/yr divided by 12 $89.71/mo.
4. Total misc. pickups
a. $12,439.44/yr + $426.10/yr + $1,076.49/y3c = $13,942.03/yr
b. $13,942.03 divided by 12 = $1,161.84/mo
C. Apartment Units 4-plex 6 Above (approx. 604 units 1
(would require 300 -gal. to 400 -gal. containers)
1. Once per week
4 hrs pickup + 1-1/2 hr landfill + 1/4 hr break =
5-3/4 hrs x 52 wks = 299 hrs x $39.87 - $11, 921. 13/yr
divided by 12 - $993.43/mo
2. Twice per week "additional"
4 hrs pickup + 1/4 hr break (no additional landfill)
_
4-1/4 hrs x 52 = 221 hrs/yr x $39.87 - $8,811.27/yr
divided by 12 - $734.27/mo
D. Additional Unit Cost
1. Sinale thru tri-plex (once per week)
1,040 hrs divided by 1,300 units divided by 12 mo
0.067 hr/mo/unit x $39.87/hr - $2.67/unit/month
2. Apartment units, 4-plex, 6 above (once per week)
299 hrs divided by 604 units divided by 12 mo e
0.0413/hr/mo/unit x $39.87/hr . $1.65/unit/month
3. Apartment units, 4-plex, b above (twice Der week)
299 hrs + 221 hrs - 520 hrs divided by 604 units divided
by 12 mo. s 0.072/mo/unit x $39.87/hr a $2.67/unit/month
•NOTE: Approximate overtime coat (excludes ownorship costs).
SUMMARY: This proposal uses 1009 of the regular productive hours and may not
allow for significant growth without overtime hours or
subcontracting some work in the future. .It also doss not allow for
any significant problems with equipment or our recycling program,
although none are expected.
GARB. BID: 8/17/90 Page 3 of 4
I. Base Fiqures
CITY -OPERATED GARBAGE/REFUSE COLLECTION
SINGLE FAMILY THRU TRI -FLEX 6 MISC. CITY
(once per week automated)
A.
Garbage/refuse employee only
1. Ownership costa/yr
$20,393.00
2. Salaries 6 benefits
38,110.00
3. Fuel, maint., 6 backup,
1,379 productive hours*
13,205.05
4. 7 dumpsters, automated
426.10
5. TOTAL ANNUAL. COST
$72,133.15
6. TOTAL MONTHLY COST
$ 6,011.10
11. Additional Unit Costs
A. AddiLlonal fuel 6 maint.
$5.95/hr.x 0.5865/hr/mo/unit m $0.34
B.
Combination employee
Public Works 23.86
Garbage/rofuse 76.26
$20,393.00
29,039.82
13,205.05
426.10
$63,063.97
$ 5,255.33
B. Additional fuel, maint.. 6 labor
$24.13/hr x 0.5865/hr/mo/unit - $1.41
SUMMARY: This proposal allows for 23.86 growth or special activities (yard waste) and a poeslble Joint
vonturo with Buffalo which could further reduce costs. Option B provides additional manpower
In public works which is needed but allows for draw of labor as needed.
*NOTE: Loaf pickup during regular hours.
GARD.DID; 8/17/90 Pago 4 of 4
a
Council Agenda - 8/27/90
Consideration of ratifvina union contract renewal. (R.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The current two-year union contract with six members of the
public works department maintenance staff expired April i,
1990; and since early this spring, Mr. Mike O'Connor, Vie
City's labor attorney, along with myself, has had several
negotiating sessions with Mr. Tim Connors, business agent of
Local Union #49, and the local union steward, Al Gapinski .
After narrowing down the issues during the first few sessions ,
we thought we were near an agreement on the wage package and
other language changes almost two months ago. Somewhat to our
surprise, the union, on behalf of the members, filed a
petition to the Bureau of Mediation Services requesting a
mediation session to iron out the details of a new contract.
During the mediation session that was held Friday, August 3 ,
the union representatives indicated their two main concerns i n
the new contract were concerning the establishment of a mor e
flexible work schedule during the summer hours and the issue
of the City's contribution toward health insurance coverage
for the employee and their dependents. Previously to this,
the union membership had basically agreed to other mind r
contract changes, including a salary increase in the
neighborhood of 4.58 for the first year and 44 the second yea r
of the two-year contract.
During the mediation session, the union dropped their demands
for the flexible work schedule during the summer leaving this
language as is with exclusive right of the City to set hours
of work. The main issue then centered on the membership's
concern over establishing health Insurance benefits for the
next two years with the City's present insurance coverage
always renewing 1n September of each year. As you may recall,
the last time we went through this, our insurance premiums had
a drastic increase in September which affected the union
membership until April, and the Council renegotiated the
insurance portion of the union contract in mid -stream. in an
effort to compromise, the City proposed to make arty
adjustments to the Insurance contribution effective January 1,
1991, rather than waiting until April 1 on the anniversary
date of the contract. In the past, the contract language ha d
set an Increase of $10 per month plus 508 of any additional
premium cost as the amount the City would contribute Lowe rd
the employee's insurance, and our proposal was to increase
this amount to $15 plus 50% of any excess effective January 1
rather than April 1. While the union membership still was
concerned about an increase occurring In the prior September,
f they were agreeable to this movement on the City's part.
Nq
Council Agenda - 8/27/90
In the fall of 1989, the union was successful in getting the
groundskeeper/maintenance worker position added to the union
contract. This position was formerly held by Mr. Tom
Schumacher. The groundskeeper/maintenance position has
typically been approximately 3/4 time, and our new contract
spells out a different wage scale for this classification of
employee and includes benefits for holidays, vacation, and
health insurance at the 75% level of other union members.
While the City had fought that this position should not have
been part of the union agreement, the Bureau of Mediation
Services last year determined that the Local t49 could
represent this position, and we had to include it in our
contract.
The following is a summary of the changes agreed to for
Council consideration in the new labor agreement.
1. Groundskeeper/maintenance worker position is added with
its own pay range, including benefits at the 758 level.
Benefits will not include sick leave.
2. A change is made to only require three days advance
notice rather than seven days if the City changes any
assignment of regular scheduled work hours.
r
3. Clarification was added to indicate that sick leave
benefits would only be paid to equalize the employee's
pay scale if he was receiving health Insurance disability
benefits.
4. Reduce the time period from 12 months to 6 months when an
employee could be placed on inactive status and be
discharged for medical reasons unless a certified
statement from a doctor is submitted indicating the
employee would be able to resume duties within a
reasonable Limo period.
5. Revise tho pay scales for the equipment mochan ic /operator
position to a top rate of $12.35 an hour effective 4/1/90
and $12.85 per hour effective 4/1/91. This compares to
a present wage rate of $11.82 for the top position.
Resulting increase is 4.58 for the first year and
approximately 48 for the second year.
Establish the groundskooper/maintonanco position wage
scale at a top rate of $6.69 per hour effective 4/1/90,
and $6.96 per hour effective 4/1/91. This was also a
4.58 and 48 increase over the present rate in effect.
C
Council Agenda - 8/27/90
Increase the City's contribution toward health insurance
coverage by an additional $15 per month plus 508 of any
increase over the $15 effective January 1, 1991; and an
additional $15 plus 50% of any excess premium for
January 1, i992.
Under the proposed contract, most of the contract language
changes have little, if any, monetary value that could be
established. The actual cost increase to the City pertains to
the salary increases of 4.59 for the first year and 48 for the
second year. In addition, the increase in the insurance
contribution effective January 1 of each year amounts to at
least 7/10 of 1% by increasing the contribution $15 per
employee but could be higher depending on how much the
Insurance premiums rise above the $15 level. Without guessing
what the insurance premiums will do in the next two years, the
union contract you are asked to ratify would amount to
approximately a 5.28 increase for the first year and 4.78 for
the second year at a minimum. Basically, it appears in line
with previous non-union salary increases.
B. ALTERNATIVE i ::TIONS:
1. The first altern,;tive would be to ratify and execute the
new two-year contract as proposed with a salary increase
of $.53 the first year and $•50 the second year.
2. The second alternative would be to not ratify a new
contract as negotiated.
1
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: �J
Based on the number of negotiating sessions that have taken
place so far and the fact that a mediation session has been
hold, I do not believe continued negotiations will result in
a much different contract than proposed. Since this contract
is now over ten years in existence, most modifications to the
language are minor, and the main issues always come down to
salary and benefits. The percentages of salary increases
appear in line with non-union personnel, and the insurance
contribution has boon consistent over the years except for
moving up the contribution date to January of each year rather
than April. The proposal appears to be a reasonable contract,
and I, therefore, recommend ratifying the now two-year
agreement as presented.
SUPPORTING DATA:
Due the length of the document, I have not included a now
contract.; but the items outlined in the agenda describe the
proposod changes. If anyone would like a copy of the full
contract, one is available at city hall for your review.
Council Agenda - 8/27/90
Consideration of resolution adopting a proposed preliminary
1991 budget and settinq a proposed tax levy. (R.W.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
As part of the recent legislation establishing truth in
taxation requirements for adopting budgets, the City is
required to adopt a preliminary budget and a preliminary tax
levy by September 1 and certify this amount to the county
auditor, or the City is limited to its previous year's levy
amount. A final budget and tax levy public hearing cannot be
held until late November or early December after the county
and the school district have held their public hearings.
The preliminary budget and tax levy adopted on Monday will be
used by the county auditor to develop a proposed tax statement
that will be mailed to all property owners in the city. The
purpose of this is to let people know what their real estate
taxes may be for the next year and encourage the public to get
Involved in the budget process for all governmental units. I
had originally planned on recommending that the Council adopt
the maximum levy allowable, and later on the staff would be
preparing the actual budget document for the Council to
review. This has been the process during the past number of
years and allows the City more flexibility by establishing the
highest dollar amount allowable and working backwards if
necessary. Since we can always go down in our budget
requirements later on but can never go up, we want to make
sure that the preliminary tax levy is sufficient for
anticipated needs.
One disadvantage to this maximum levy is that if we determine
later that we do not need to raise the maximum tax levy, the
citizens have been informed through this dummy tax statement
process of our proposed higher tax levy; when in reality, our
final budget doesn't require that high of an increase. If we
are reasonably comfortable with a lower tax levy, it may be
wiser to adopt a preliminary budget at a level we are
comfortable with to avoid possible backlash from the public.
One advantage to the higher maximum tax levy at this time is
that it would allow the City Council and staff more time and
flexibility in adopting the final budget for 1991 in case
additional programs or expenditures come along before the
public hearing in December.
While the staff has not yet gone over each department or fund
budget in detail, 1 have reviewed the entire budget and
prepared an estimate for next year on a preliminary basis.
Major items have been accounted for in the overall funds and
departments that the staff is aware of, and I fool the
proposed preliminary budget will be fairly close to the
Council Agenda - 8/27/90
estimates provided under either option enclosed. The
difference between option #1 and option t2 involves the
capital outlay revolving fund. Under option 41, the maximum
levy allowable has been shown, which would result in a 10.28
increase in our tax levy. rhe balance of the tax levy needed
to reach the maximum levy was placed in the capital outlay
fund. Under option b2, our levy would increase 7.18, and
again this would provide for a capital outlay fund budget of
at least $210,000.
Some possible budget items for the capital outlay revolving
fund levy are as follows:
Restroom for west Bridge Park $30,000
Add'l public works maint. bldg. facility $80,000
1/3 of a new pumper fire truck $50,000
Unallocated reserve $50,000
The above items are larger capital outlay projections that
have not been included within each department or fund. The
above items will be discussed by the Council at our budget
sessions, but it's used to give you an example of what the
capital outlay fund could be earmarked for. It appears that
the City may be looking at a new fire truck in the next three
>� years, and it may be wise to begin allocating money for this
purpose. In addition, the unallocated reserve could be used
for covering such expenditures as pending or future lawsuits
or for any reason.
What the proposed budget levy does include at this time is:
- a 58 wage adjustment
- comparable worth study revisions --outside consultant
services
- anticipated 158 Increase in police contract
- 158 Increase in the transportation budget
- a refuse collection budget sufficient to cover the
entire cost of the City purchasing a truck in one year
and operating the program for one year/or continuing
contracting as In the past ;does not include funds
for residential container cost if City picked up
garbage with an automated system)
- normal cost adjustments throughout the budget
- a substantial capital outlay revolving fund under
either option
In preparing this proposed tax levy, revenue projections for
1991 wore loft at the same level as 1990. Upon further
refinement of the budget, I anticipate there should be an
Increase in the revenue, which would eventually result in a
reduction In the tax levy needed when the final budget is
10
Council Agenda - 8/27/90
adopted. As a result, I feel comfortable that we could
develop a budget to meet the tax levy proposed under
option q2, and most likely, it will even be less than this.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Adopt the resolution setting a proposed tax levy at the
maximum allowable at $2,830,352 (option @1).
2. Adopt the resolution setting a proposed tax levy of
$2,752,778 (option A2).
3. Adopt a proposed tax levy higher or lower than the amount
indicated above.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
While adopting the maximum levy allowable would provide the
most flexibility in the next two months in developing next
year's budget, I do feel comfortable with proposing a 7%
increase under option 92. I feel this will still be more than
sufficient to meet our needs; and in all likelihood, the
actual tax levy requirements will still be less than this.
Politically, it may be a wiser choice to go with the lower
amount since it does seem that from my estimation it will not
be necessary to levy the maximum next year. If we do not
adopt any proposed tax levy by September 1, we would be
limited to the same levy as last year.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Preliminary budget summaries; Preliminary tax levy summaries
under options 01 and 42; and resolutions under options I1 and
Y2.
C
PRELIMINARY
GENERAL FUND SUMMARY
1991 BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
1990
1991
Mayor and Council
$
16,225
$
16,225
Administraticn
140,475
152,275
Finance
75,630
76,800
Insurance
46,050
48,000
Audit
11,750
11,500
Legal
23,175
23,175
Planning 6 Zoning
31,300
32,750
Inspections --Bldg. Official
46,975
47,825
Assessing
15,150
15,650
Deputy Registrar
59,250
61,175
City Hall
39,450
46,600
Computer
56,000
55,025
Elections
8,800
-0-
TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT
$
570,230
$
587,000
Law Enforcement
$
150,100
$
172,050
Fire
128,325
133,425
Civil Defense
6,950
7,150
Animal Control
16,600
17,600
TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY
$
301,975
$
330,225
Admin. & Engineering
$
68,785
$
71,050
Streets 5 Alleys
166,700
170,250
Snow 6 Ice
12,250
12,250
Street Lighting
38,500
39,500
Public Parking Lots
3,425
3,450
Shop 6 Garage
24,650
24,650
Retuse Collection
222,000
250,000
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS
$
536,310
$
571,150
Senior Citizens/Museum
$
33,975
$
34,825
YMCA/Community Ed.
24,000
24,500
TOTAL HEALTH 6 WELFARE
$
57,975
$
59,325
Parks 6 Rec.•/Comotery
S
111,925
$
133,705
TOTAL PARKS 6 RECREATION
$
111,925
$
133,705
Community Development
$
53,025
$
50,300
Cable Communications
-0-
-0-
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
S
93,025
S
50,300
TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
$1,631,440
$1,731,705
S
O
r
OPTION it
PRELIMINARY
TAX LEVY SUMMARY
1991 BUDGET
ALL FUNDS
Fund
Payable
Payable 1990
8 Chanqe
General
$1,385,930
$1,285,665
Library
29,775
28,625
Transportation
19,000
16,475
Shade Tree
34,800
16,800
OAA
31,300
28,300
HRA
20,125
19,875
Debt Service
1,021,848
1,076,541
Capital Imp. Revolving
287,574
95,825
TOTAL
$2,830,352
$2,568,106
10.28
Levy Increase - $262,246
Payable 1983
Mill Rate . . . .
. . . . 20.978
Payable 1984
Mill Rate . . . .
. . 17.734
Payable 1985
Mill Rate . . . .
. . . . 18.874
Payable 1986
Mill Rate . . . .
. . . . 15.689
Payable 1987
Mill Rate . . . .
. . . . 15.715
Payable 1988
Mill Rate . . . .
. . . . 15.932•
Payable 1989
Tax Capacity Rate
14.283••
Payable 1990
Tax Capacity Rate
16.187
Est. Payable
1991 Tax Capacity
Rate. 17.529
• (12.188) if
converted to Tax
Capacity Rate
--Now referred to as "Tax Capacity Rate"
Assessed Valuation
Mill Rate
Tax Levy
'82/Payable 1983 $
58,492,537
20.978
$1,227,064
'83/Payable 1984
71,114,939
17.734
1,260,475
184/Payablo 1985
79,954,554
18.874
1,509,003
'85/Payablo 1986
100,568,378
15.689
1,577,250
'86/Payable 1987
106,722,013
15.715
1,676,900
187/Payable 1988
114,339,670
15.932
1,821,370
Tax
Tax
Capacity
Value
Capacity Rate
Tax Levy
'88/Payablo 1989 $
15,405,139
14.283••
$2,198,008
'89/Payable 1990
15,868,653
16.187
2,568,106
'90/Payablo 1991
16,146,831
17.529
2,830,352
e
PRELIMINARY
1991 BUDGET SUMMARY
-Based on option N2 tax levy
C
1991
1990
FUND
REVENUE
EXPENDITURES
REVENUES
EXPENDITURES
General
$1,731,705
$1,731,705
$1,631,440
$1,631,440
Library
29,775
29,775
28,875
28,875
Transportation
70,750
70,750
64,175
64,175
Shade Tree
40,250
40,250
22,250
22,250
UDAG
33,075
-0-
31,150
-0-
OAA
31,300
31,300
29,600
29,600
HRA
272,475
217,044
279,475
194,125
Debt Service
1,649,889
1,746,350
1,719,085
1,715,010
Liquor
1,260,000
1,145,500
1,200,000
1,097,000
water
147,000
140,875
145,250
135,750
Sewer
420,325
420,325
413,645
413,645
Capital Imp.•
210,000
210,000
111,500
111,500
Water Improvement
10,250
-0-
8,550
-0-
Sewor Improvement
12,000
-0-
11,600
-0-
TOTAL
$5,918,794
$5,783,874
$5,696,595
$5,443,370
-Based on option N2 tax levy
C
MAXIMUM LEVY LIMIT CALCULATIONS
1990 1991
Levy limit established by state $1,671,443 $1,780,120
Special levies
Library 26,652 28,384
Bonded Debt 1,076,541 1,021,848
Maximum Levy Limit $2,774,636 $2,830,352
Actual Levy Adopted $2,568,106 ?
Examples of Capital Outlay Items Included in Proposed Levy
City Hall: -
parking lot expansion
S 5,000
-
cabinets/storage
2,500
-
office area dividers
10,000
-
mist. computer equip. 6 software
12,000
Bldg. Inspec.: -
pickup truck
10,000
Library:
- unallocated
4,000
Econ. Dev.:
- community brochures
3,000
Fire Department
Items:
15,000
Parks Dept.:
- mower
11,000
- pickup truck
10,000
- trees, picnic tables, etc.
5,600
Tree:
- new chipper
20,000
Street:
- sealcoating program
31,500
- unallocated
12,000
Refuse:
- unallocated
1,650
Water:
- chlorine scale & mixer
2,800
Sewer:
- electronic locator
1,600
$157,650
DOES NOT INCLUDE CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND
C
Rffl.n
SUMMARY
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
1991 BUDGET FORECAST
REVENUE:
31011 Current Ad Valorem $1,021,848
33402 Homestead Credit
36210 Interest 104,100
36101 Spec. Asmt.--County 358,907
36102 Spec. Asmt.--Direct
Transfer In --Tax Inc. 165,034
TOTAL REVENUE $1,649,889
EXPENDITURES:
470016010 Principal $1,065,000
470016110 Interest 617,947
470016201 Paying Agent Fees 7,003
Int. Exp. --Fund Deficits 56,400
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $1,746,350
L)
C
a
OPTION 02
PRELIMINARY
TAX LEVY SUMMARY
1991 BUDGET
ALL FUNDS
Fund
Payable
Payable 1990
8 Chanae
General
$1,385,930
$1,285,665
Library
29,775
28,625
Transportation
19,000
16,475
Shade Tree
34,800
16,800
OAA
31,300
28,300
HRA
20,125
19,875
Debt Service
1,021,848
1,076,541
Capital Imp. Revolving
210,000
95,825
TOTAL
$2,752,778
$2,568,106
7.18
Levy Increase - $184,672
Payable 1983
Mill Rate . . . .
. . . . 20.978
Payable 1984
Mill Rate . . . .
. . . . 17.734
Payable 1985
Mill Rate
. 16.874
Payable 1986
Mill Rate . . . .
. . . . 15.689
Payable 1987
Mill Rate . . . .
. . . . 15.715
Payable 1988
Mill Rate . .
. . . . 15.932•
Payable 1989
Tax Capacity Rate
. . . . 14.283••
Payable 1990
Tax Capacity Rate
. . . . 16.187
Est. Payable
1991 Tax Capacity
Rate. . 17.048
• (12.188) if
converted to Tax
Capacity Rate
••Now referred
to as "Tax Capacity Rate"
Assessed
Valuation
Mill Rate
Tax Levy
'82/Payablo 1983 $
58,492,537
20.978
$1,227,064
'83/Payable 1984
71,114,939
17.734
1,260,475
'84/Payable 1985
79,954,554
18.874
1,509,003
'85/Payable 1986
100,568,378
15.689
1,577,250
'86/Payable 1987
106,722,013
15.715
1,676,900
'87/Payable 1988
114,339,670
15.932
1,821,370
Tax
Tax
Capacity
Value Capacity Rate
Tax Levy
'88/Payablo 1989 $
15,405,139
14.283••
$2,198,008
'89/Payablo 1990
15,868,653
16.187
2,568,106
C '90/Payablo 1991
16,146,831
17.048
2,752,778
O
Q -
OPT/OA! 416 / (ftV4virnunn Levy
AOIo wed,
RESOLUTION 90-
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PROPOSED 1991 BUDGET
AND SETTING A PROPOSED TAX LEVY
WHEREAS, the City Administrator has prepared and submitted to the City
Council a proposed budget setting forth therein his estimated needs of the
City of Monticello for all operations and the debt service for the fiscal
year commencing January 1, 1991.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO
that the proposed budget so submitted by the City Administrator is adopted
as a preliminary budget for the fiscal year commencing January 1, 1991, and
be it further resolved by the Council of the City of Monticello that there
be, and hereby is, levied for the fiscal year commencing on January 1,
1991, and the following sums for the respective purposes indicated therein,
upon the taxable property of the city of Monticello, to wit:
Revenue
General
$1,385,930
Library
29,775
OAA
31,300
HRA
20,125
Tree
34,800
Transportation
19,000
Debt Retirement
Debt service funds
$1,021,848
Capital Improvements
Capital improvement revolving
$ 287,574
TOTAL PROPOSED TAX LEVY
$2,830,352
The above resolution was introduced by Councilmembor
was duly seconded by Councilmembor with the following
voting in favor:
Opposed:
The City Administrator is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy
of this resolution to the County Auditor of Wright County, Minnesota.
Dated this 27th day of August, 1990.
City Administrator
Mayor
C
C
OPT/ONS
RESOLUTION 90 -
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PROPOSED 1991 BUDGET
AND SETTING A PROPOSED TAX LEVY
WHEREAS, the City Administrator has prepared and submitted to the City
Council a proposed budget setting forth therein his estimated needs of the
City of Monticello for all operations and the debt service for the fiscal
year commencing January 1, 1991.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO
that the proposed budget so submitted by the City Administrator is adopted
as a preliminary budget for the fiscal year commencing January 1, 1991, and
be it further resolved by the Council of the City of Monticello that there
be, and hereby is, levied for the fiscal year commencing on January 1,
1991, and the following sums for the respective purposes indicated therein,
upon the taxable property of the city of Monticello, to wit:
Revenue
General
$1,385,930
Library
29,775
OAA
31,300
HRA
20,125
Tree
34,800
Transportation
19,000
Debt Retirement
Debt service funds
$1,021,848
Capital Improvements
Capital improvement revolving
$ 210,000
TOTAL PROPOSED TAX LEVY
$2,752,778
The above resolution was introduced by Councilmember
was duly seconded by Councilmombor with tho following
voting in favor:
Opposed:
The City Administrator is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy
of this resolution to the County Auditor of Wright County, Minnesota.
Dated this 27th day of August, 1990.
Mayor
City Administrator
Council Agenda - 8/27/90
9. Consideration of resolution approving 1991 MH DOT transit
assistance application. (J.0.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The Monticello Transportation Committee requests that Council
review the attached 1991 transit assistance application and to
consider approval of a resolution which outlines the City's
commitment r -o pay 40 percent of operations cost and 20 percent
of total capital equipment cost.
The transit assistance application consists of a management
plan, associated budget, and includes an assortment of
compliance forms. The 1991 application is very similar to the
application approved for 1990. Following are some points
worth menti ening regarding the 1991 transit application.
Please review the transit assistance application for more
detail.
Manaqement Plan
The management plan does not call for any major changes to the
manner in which transportation service is currently provided.
The plan does include modifications to the operation of the
system that were made in 1990, which include, among other
items, prow.ision of service to Kjellberg's West Mobile Home
Park and provision of service to churches and area businesses
located in areas directly adjoining the city.
Statistics rogarding expected ridership, cost per ride, and
cost per milo can be found in the management plan. Those
statistics are based on six months of experience and should
provide a conservative forecast of the effectiveness and
efficiency of the system.
Budget
The budget proposed requests 10 -hour a day service, the same
level of so rvlce in terms of total hours as was requested for
1990.
1990 Budqot
The total 12 -month budget for 1990 called for a total
expenditure of $69,857. Sixty percent of this amount is
financed by the State of Minnesota. The remaining 40 percent
of this is financed by the local share, which includes fare
revenue, donations, and City funds. The local share amounted
to $27,947. Of this budget amount, the projected fare and
donations rovenue was forecast to be $11,700, and tho City
12
Council Agenda - 8/27/90
portion was established at $16,250. After seven months of
service, it appears that our total budget forecast for 1990 is
going to be accurate with a total projected 12 -month
expenditure in 1990 of $68,435. On the revenue side, it
appears that fare revenue will fall short of the projected
goal of $11,700 by about $2,000. According to the contract
with the State, the City will need to make up this shortfall.
The 1991 budget calls for an expenditure of $70,734, which is
a 3.4 percent increase over the 1990 projected expenditure,
and a 1.2 percent increase over the 1990 budget. The local
share is projected to be $28,294 with the City paying $19,000.
This amounts to an increase to the City portion of the local
share of $2,500 over the previous year. This increase is
necessary because the average fare has been less than
expected. Fare revenue has not met expectations, as riders
almost always utilize the ticket system ($.50/ride) and rarely
pay the full $1.00 fare. It was expected that a higher
percentage would pay full fare. If Council is uncomfortable
with the City paying a larger portion of the local share,
fares could be increased.
Please note that a preliminary application has already been
submitted to the State of Minnesota in anticipation of Council
approval. The budget figures in the application included
projections made prior to the recent upturn in gas prices.
Fuel and lubrication expenses make up only about 5.5 percent
of the total budget; therefore, a 30 percent increase in gas
prices should result in an upward budget adjustment of
approximately 1.7 percent, or $1,200. The increase in gas
prices could be a good justification for an increase in the
discount ticket price.
The proposed budget does not call for City acquisition of a
buo; however, the transit oyetem operation bid specification
does include an alternate bid calling for the private
contractor operating and maintaining a bus owned by the City.
it after bids aro submitted it appears that City ownership of
the bus makes economic sense, staff will submit the concept to
Council for review.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to adopt the resolution approving 1991 MN/DOT
transit assistance application.
Under this alternative, staff will submit the application
to the State. I have boon informed that the funding is
available; therefore, City approval of the program as
outlined assures continued service in 1991.
13
L Council Agenda - 8/27/90
If Council is concerned about the increase in the City
portion of the local share, Council could direct me to
work with the Monticello Transportation Advisory
Committee toward development of a revised fare schedule.
2. Motion to deny adoption of the resolution approving 1991
MN/DOT transit assistance application.
If Council is not satisfied with the manner in which the
program is operated, or if Council feels that the system
should be discontinued, this option should be selected.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The system is operating well. Ridership continues to
Increase. Cost per ride continues to decrease. The
Monticello Transportation Advisory Committee, along with City
staff, recommends that Council approve the 1991 transit
assistance application.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
1991 Transit Assistance Application; Resolution for adoption;
Spreadsheet showing system budget and performance during first
�- six months of operation.
C
14
RESOLUTION 90 -
l
RESOLUTION ENTERING INTO CONTRACT
PROVIDING A PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SERVICE
BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Monticello enter into a contract
with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, to
provide a public transportation service in the Monticello area.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Monticello agrees to
provide a minimum of 40 percent of the total operating cost and
20 percent of the total capital cost of the transit project from
local funds, including bus fare revenue.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that authorization to execute the
aforementioned contract and any amendments thereto is hereby given
to the Assistant Administrator or the City Administrator.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Senior Citizen Center Director or
the Assistant Administrator or the City Administrator is hereby
authorized to execute requests for reimbursement from the Minnesota
Department of Transportation.
Adopted this 27th day of August, 1990.
Lim
Mayor
City Administrator
•aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa••aaaaaaaa•
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and
correct copy of the resolution presented to and adopted by the
Monticello City Council at a duly authorized meeting thereof hold
on the 27th day of August, 1990, as shown by the minutes of said
meeting in my possession.
Rick Wolfstollor
City Administrator
Title
C
D
I BUDGET YEAR IC 1990
1991 I
` - I (13 aonDATE PROJ PROJ 1
----------------------------------
*VEHICLE REG/PERMIT 1' $0 It $(
90
'FED FUEL/LUBRICANT I' so s0 60
60 I
'STATE FUEL/LUBRICANI' so $( I(
60 I
'OTHER IAXES/FEES it iG I. 60
so I
--------------- I --------------- - ------- ---------
10TAL I' LO
I
I
1625 TOTAL OPERATINGI1175.619 $37,029 $74,138
$70.73A I
I
-------- I ----------------------- -
ODERATING REVENUES I
---------
I
I
'PASSENGER FARES 1'1112,676 113,580 $6,571
I
$5,308 1
'CONTRACT REVENUES 1' 110 $3,000 61,00(
63,000 1
'REVENUES -OTHER Is s0 so $0
f0 I
'OTHER FINANCIAL ASS1' s0 60 t(
f0 I
I ---------------- -----------------
-TOTAL REVENUES 1'$12,576 $6,580 $10,571
119,308 1
CAPITAL EXPENSES I
I
'VEHICLE 1'$A2.750 $0 NA
110 1
'LIFT,RAMP ETC 1' 50 10 NA
60 I
'RADIO EQUIPMENT 1' 111,000 11733 NA
f0 1
'FAREBOX 1' 1500 $0 NA
t0 1
'OTHER CAPITAL EXPENI' $0 $0 NA
s0 1
1585 TOTAL CAPITAL 111144,250 $733 NA
s0 I
I
REVENUE FOR CAPITAL I
I
I
-FEDERAL CAPITAL GRAI $0
so I
'OTH FIN ASSISTANCE I $0
I
60 I
I
I
'HEARTLAND EXPRESS M1' 12,500 12,500 NA
I
$2,500 1
1
1
PROJECTED ANNUAL C01'175,679 1111,13°;
170.731 1
SLATE OF MN REVENUE 1105,401 $45.407
$42,111 1
PROJECTED FARE REVE1'c12,676 110,57'1
19,306 1
PROJECTED CITY EXPEI'1111,596 $18.1661
118,906 1
Additional City share
so I
CQMT01i GrAT1Sr1C3
TOTAL NUMBER OF PASS1' 19501 7781 16901 16225
ELOERIY I' 14041 3155 6959 5681
HANOICAPPEO I' SBS 332 698 670
CHILDREN I' 2925 2493 6195 5947
FREE RIDES - TODDLE(' 390 535 1177 1130
DIAL-A-RIDE/GENERALI' 1560 1266 1872 1797
CTOTAL 1 OF VOLNTR DRI 0 0 0
DIAL VEHICLE HOURS 1' 2708 1384 2581 2478
TOTAL VEHICLE MILES Is 29250 13098 26040 21998
TOTAL VOLUNTEER DRIVI 0 0 0
DEC (JAN
I
IEEB
I
MARCH (APRIL MAY (JUNE I
I I I I I
1
$0 1
so I
to I
to 1
so I
so I
1
$0 1
so I
so I
so I
so I
so I
1
so i
so I
s0 I
so I
so I
to I
I
$01
101
101
f0 I
s0 I
s0 I
so I
$0 I
s0 I
==:_I ====:::1:===::=
so I
so I
=======1:======1
s0 I
to I
::: I ::::::::I::==
$5,581 1 11,914
I
1 $1.8761$4,936 1$5,907 115,/66 115.369 1
I I I
I
I
$674 1
I
I
$7851
I
I
$2211
I
I
13371
I
$595 1
I
$470 1
I
$199 1
11.000 1 12,000
1
so 1
10 1
$0 1
$0 1
$o I
so i
to I
so 1
10 1
so I
s0 I
to I
1
so I
so 1
so I
so I
so I
to I
11,674 1 12,7851
$2211
13371
1596 1
1470 1
1499 1
I
s0 1
I
60 1
I
10 1
I
to I
I
$0 1
I
s0 I
i
10 I
so I
to 1
10 1
so I
so 1
so 1
so I
$733 1
to 1
10 1
10 1
t0 I
10 I
10 I
so 1
to 1
so I
so I
so I
so I
so I
10 1
10 1
10 1
10 1
s0 I
f0 I
10 I
$733 1
I
10 1
I
s0 I
I
to I
I
f0 I
I
s0 I
I
$0 I
I
so 11
s011
s011
$0 11
to II
se II
to II
so 1
10 1
so I
so I
to 1
10 1
to I
$319 1 11,531 I $SBS 1 160 I {0 1 110 I f0 I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I t I
W
IID
m
I
I
I
93D I
I
1
I
872 1
I
I
I
1076 1
I
I
I
1139 1
I
I
I
1507 1
I
I
I
1520 I
355 1
330 1
407 1
$4 5 1
578 I
631 I
53 1
41 1
37 1
64 1
54 1
61 1
183 1
119 I
312 I
343 I
693 1
617 1
75 1
103 I
91 I
58 I
SB 1
107 1
265 I
207 1
111 I
129 I
124 I
IDI I
01
0
0
01
01
01
206 I
113 I
200 1
200 I
209 I
I00 I
1961 1
1721 1
2082 1
1911 1
1842 1
2157 1
o,
- it #
1 BUDGET YEAR TO 1990 - 1991 1 DEC IJAN IFEB IMARCH (APRIL IMAY IJUNE I
I (13 mon DATE PROJ PROJ I I I I I I I I
---------------- ----------------I-------I--------I------- 1....... 1 ------- I ------- I ------- I
NUMBER OF OIAL-A-RID( 0 0 0 1 1 I I I 1 1 1
NUMBER OF TIMES LIFT( 108 198 190 1 26 I 16 1 13 I 8 I 15 I 15 I 15 1
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
C057 PER MILE Is 12.59 $2.83 12.85 $2.83 I $4.15 1 12.50 I $2.82 1 $2.37 1 12.99 1 $2.96 I $2.49 1
PASSENGERS PER MILE(' 0.67 0.59 0.65 0.65 1 0.55 I 0.47 1 0.50 1 0.52 1 0.58 1 0.82 1 0.70 I
TOTAL COST/PASSENGEI' $3.88 $4.76 $4.39 14.36 1 $7.57 I $5.28 1 $5.59 1 14.59 1 $5.19 1 $3.61 1 $3.53 1
MILES PER RIDE It 1.50 1.68 1.54 1.54 I 1.83 I 2.12 I 1.98 1 1.93 I 1.73 1 1.22 I 1.42 1
RIDES PER DAY 1' 72 53 62 62 I 37 1 43 1 45 I 51 1 54 1 69 I 12 I
I I I I I I I I I
TOTAL PASSENGERS I' 19501 7781 16901 16225 I 737 I 930 1 872 I 1076 1 1139 1 1507 I 1520 1
I I I I I I I I I
PffCE Jr OF TXAL RIENS
I I I I I I I I I
ELDERLY I' 72% All 41% 4151 4211 38%1 38%1 3811 4811 38%1 4211
HANDICAPPED I' 3% 4 41 4%I 4%I 6%1 5%1 3%I 611 411 4%1
CHILDREN 1' 151 32 371 37%1 13%1 20%1 2211 3511 30%1 46%1 4111
FREE RIDES - TODOLEI' 2% 7 71 7%1 6%1 8%1 12%1 811 S%I 4%1 7%1
DIAL A-RIDE/GENERAL I' $t 16 11% 11%1 36%1 2811 2411 16%1 II%1 8%1 7%1
S OPERATED AT 9.5 20 ' 21 ' 19 ' 21 ' 21 ' 22 ' 21 '
PLUS HOURS 12 10 ' 11 ' 10 ' 10 ' 10 ' 11 ' 10 '
C'
C
L
TOTAL 1' to to. to so I to I to I so I so I so I to I to I
I I I I I I I I I
OPERATIONS CHARGES I I I I I I I I I
'PURCHASE OF SERVICE 1-149,123 $24,306 119,723 $11,735 1 13,421 1 87,228 1 13,302 113.193 113,663 113,837 113,653 1
'DEPRECIATION I' s0 SL. S0. s0 I I t0 I 10 I s0 I 10 I 10 I to I
'MILEAGE REIMBURSEMEI' $9.823 $4.059 $8,067 11,715 1 1417 1 $610 I 1536 1 1615 1 1612 1 1571 1 1668 1
'REPAIR/RAINY OTHER I'
t0
4-
4
10 I
I to I
so I
so I
so I
10 I
so I
1 BUDGET
YEAR TO
1990
1991 1 DEC IJAN
IFEB
IMARCH JAPRIL 1MAY IJUNE I
I (13 man
DATE PROJ PROJ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----------------
OPERATING EXPENSES I
-------
---------I
-------
I
I --------
I
I --------
I
I -------
I
I -------
I
I-------
I
I-------
I
I
I
I
PERSONNEL SERVICES/MI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'ADMIN, MANAGEMENT 1' $7,957
14,284
$7,957
17,639 1
1612 1
$612 1
$612 1
1612 1
$612 1
$612 1
$612 1
'OPERATOR'S MAGES FTI so
SO
$1
t0 I
s0 I
t0 I
s0 I
s0 I
s0 I
s0 I
s0 I
'MAINTENANCE/REPAIR I t0
$0
st
10 1
$0 I
s0 1
10 1
SO I
s0 I
t0 I
10 I
'GENERAL OFFICE SUPPI' $3,883
12.091
13,88
13,721 I
1299 I
1299 1
$299 1
1299 1
$299 1
$299 1
$299 1
'OPERATIONS SUPPORT I $0
$0
St.
s0 I
t0 1
s0 I
s0 I
s0 I
s0 I
s0 I
SO I
'FRINGE BENEFITS FT 1' 11,655
1891
$1,65!
11,589 I
$127 I
1127 I
1127 I
$127 1
$127 1
1127 1
$127 I
--- -------------I----------------
TOTAL 1'113.494
----_----------I
$7,26E $13,491
•------I--------I--------I------- I -------I------- I -------I
$12.456 111,038 I 11.038 1 $1,038 I$1,038 j11,038 111,038 111,038 1
I
ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'MANAGEMENT FEES I' s0
$0
$0
s0 I
so I
$0 I
s0 I
t0 I
t0 I
s0 I
s0 I
'TARIFFS 6 TRAFFIC 1' 11,084
SIAS
11,29!
11.211 1
1705 1
t0 I
10 I
s0 1
1594 1
s0 I
t0 I
'ADVERTISING/PROMO 1' 11,500
160
$1,500
$1,500 1
10 1
t0 1
10 1
160 1
$0 1
10 1
$0 1
'LEGAL/AUDITING FEESI' t0
$C
$1
S0 I
t0 I
s0 I
so I
s0 I
t0 I
s0 I
s0 I
'SECURITY COSTS 1' $0
$0
$0
to I
s0 I
t0 I
s0 I
SO I
s0 I
s0 I
s0 I
'OFFICE SUPPLIES 1' 154
136
154
152 1
10 1
138 1
t0 I
s0 I
s0 1
$0 1
to I
'LEASES 6 RENTALS 1' 10
$0
s0
10 1
t0 I
s0 I
SO I
s0 I
s0 1
10 1
so I
'UTILITIES Is $0
$D
so
to I
so I
so I
so I
so I
to I
so I
to I
107HER ADMIN CHARGESI' $0
s0
s0
s0 I
s0 I
s0 I
s0 I
t0 I
so I
s0 I
I
10 I
I
------------•------- I ----------------
TOTAL 1' 12.638
11.397
.................I
$2,853
12.799 1
• --••••I --------
1705 1
I --------
$38 1
I
SO 1
....... I .......
160 1
I -------
$594 I
-------
$0 1
I
So I
I
VEHICLE CHARGES I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'FUEL AND LUBRICANTSI' SO
1C,
so-
10 1
s0 I
t0 I
t0 I
so I
s0 I
t0 I
t0 I
'MAINT/REPAIR MATERII' 10
$0
t0
so I
s0 I
s0 I
so I
so I
t0 I
s0 I
t0 I
'CONTRACT SERVICE LBI' so
101
SG,
s0 I
t0 I
s0 I
t0 I
to 1
10 1
to I
SO I
'TIRES I' t0
$0
t0
t0 I
t0 I
t0 1
10 1
10 1
$0 1
10 1
$0 I
'OTHER CHARGES I' s0
IG
t0,
t0 I
s0 I
s0 1
10 1
s0 I
10 I
t0 I
s0 I
TOTAL 1' to to. to so I to I to I so I so I so I to I to I
I I I I I I I I I
OPERATIONS CHARGES I I I I I I I I I
'PURCHASE OF SERVICE 1-149,123 $24,306 119,723 $11,735 1 13,421 1 87,228 1 13,302 113.193 113,663 113,837 113,653 1
'DEPRECIATION I' s0 SL. S0. s0 I I t0 I 10 I s0 I 10 I 10 I to I
'MILEAGE REIMBURSEMEI' $9.823 $4.059 $8,067 11,715 1 1417 1 $610 I 1536 1 1615 1 1612 1 1571 1 1668 1
'REPAIR/RAINY OTHER I'
t0
$L.
to
10 I
I to I
so I
so I
so I
10 I
so I
'LEASES AND RENTALS 1'
s0
$0
s0
10 I
1 10 1
10 1
10 1
s0 I
t0 1
10 1
'OTHER OPER CHARGES 1'
t0
1G
10
10 I
1 10 1
t0 I
10 I
to 1
10 1
10 I
-------------- ---
TOTAL 1'159,546 120,366 151,191
I I I I- I I I
I$$.119 1 1).838 113,838 1 13,1138 11),8)8 111,275 111,108 114,3)1
I
1
I
INSURANCE CHARGES I
I
I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'PUB LIAR/PROP OAMAGI'
s0
s0
s0
10 I
I t0 1
10 I
t0 I
10 1
10 1
10 I
'PUB LTAA/PROP OAMAGI'
s0
1
s0
t0 I
I to I
t0 1
10 1
10 I
s0 I
s0 I
Tout I'
so
t
to
to I
to I so I
to I
to I
to I
to I
so I
TAXES AND FEES I I I I I I I I I I
O
Contract Number
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECIPIENT'S
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURES
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
On this day of , 19_, before me
appeared Karen Hanson, Jeffrey R. O'Neill, and Richard Wolfsteller,
to me personally know, who being by me duly sworn, did say they are
respectively Sr. Center Director, Assistant Administrator, and City
Administrator of the City of Monticello.
Cite of Monticello
RECIPIENT
By
Title Sr. Center Director
By
Title AOeiatant Administrator
By
Title City Administrator NOTARY
I
C
CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE TO 49 CFR 604
Charter Service Final Rule
City of Monticello hereby certifies that
(recipient organization)
charter service will not be provided if there is at least
one private charter operator willing and able to provide
the charter service that the recipient proposes to provide.
Signature
Jeff O'Neill
Name
Assistant Administrator
Title
Date
Page 33 S
B
l
July 16, 1990
MOM (CELLO
250 East Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362.9245
Phone: (612)295.2i11
Metro: (612) 333.5739
'm'"'ne[h Mau,
Krn
Mr. Randy Halvorson
Director
ck.C__d
Dan slonicen
Office of Transit
Fan Fm,
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Shirley A,denon
815 Transportation Building
W.— S—th
St. Paul, MN 55155
nd—
Rick WolJrulln
Dear Mr. Halvorson:
n„,.,. n Ad,..—.,. s
Jeff O'Neill
On behalf of the City of Monticello and the Monticello
Publk uml.
Heartland Express, I am pleased to submit the enclosed
John Simla
application for 1991 state operating assistance.
B'11,8 orrcwl
- Gary Ando
In less than six months of operation, the Monticello
„_.Dedop�.
Heartland Express has become a valued institution in
011ie Ko,opchak
the community. System ridership among children and
elderly has shown consistent growth throughout the
first few months of operation. Ridership has
increased even during late spring and early summer
when ridership typically falls off. Ridership figures
clearly illustrate that Monticello Heartland Express
is meeting transportation needs of a cross section of
the community.
The City thanks you and the State of Minnesota for
continued support of the Monticello Heartland Express.
Yours truly,
CITY OF M-ONT.ICEELLO
y00
Jeff O'Noill
Assistant Administrator
JO/kd
Ccc:
File
MANAGEMENT PLAN
MONTICELLO HEARTLAND EXPRESS 1990-1991
ORGANIZATION
The Heartland Express is organized and monitored by the City
of Monticello under a contractual arrangement with Hoglund
Transportation of Monticello. The Heartland Express was
operated through 1990 as a "demonstration project." Later in
1990, competitive bidding for the 1991 bus delivery service
contract will be conducted. The 1991 management plan,
contract bid specifications, and budget are based on the
service demand and delivery experience gathered during the
demonstration period. As a result of the demonstration
project, it has been found that utilization of a private
contractor is in the best interest of the Monticello Heartland
Express. Selection of the service provider for budget year
1991 will be the result of a formal bidding process and in
keeping with state requirements. Budget figures outlining
expected contract expense are based on an expected 4%
increase.
At present, Hoglund Transportation operates the Monticello
Heartland Express and is responsible for the day to day
operation of the transit program. Gordy Hoglund, owner of
Hoglund Transportation, is responsible for the day to day
management and operation of the transit system. If Hoglund
Transportation fails to win the bid, operation of the system
would become the responsibility of the winning bidder.
The owner/operator of Hoglund Transportation is responsible
for hiring, establishing wages, and terminating all employees
working on conjunction with the Heartland Express.
The City of Monticello's Assistant Administrator, Jeff
O'Neill, will represent the applicant in negotiating an
assistance contract with the state. The Assistant
Administrator, with the assistance of the Senior Center
Director, will be responsible for monitoring the ongoing
operation of tho system and will assist the Monticello
Transportation Advisory Committee and the City Council in
development of the Monticello transportation system operation
policy. In addition, the Monticello Transportation Advisory
Committee will provide marketing and operations support for
the program in the form of in-kind contributions of time.
BUSPLAN: 7/16/90 Page 1
` Hoglund Transportation, as the present transportation service
provider, currently provides bus service to the Monticello
School District and to other organizations. The
transportation company staff consists of 35 drivers and 1
dispatcher. Two employees have been added to the existing
Hoglund Transportation staff to service the contract with the
City of Monticello. Of the staff added, one is a full-time
driver and one works part-time. Each part-time driver works
approximately ten hours per week.
The transportation service provider is responsible for filing
required reports to the Transportation Regulation Board.
B. PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
GOALS: The main goal for 1991 is to maintain a client base
through delivery of an efficient and effective
transportation service.
1. Cost Efficiency
Establish a service level designed to encourage ridership
while maintaining reasonable operating costs through
efficient use of employees and a single 25 passenger
vehicle.
1990 Projected Estimated miles: 25,000
1990 Projected Cost per mile: $2.85
1990 Projected Hours per employee: 1,250
2. Service Effectiveness
Target elderly and handicapped markets with a variety of
marketing campaigns to attract initial ridership.
Establish user oriented system featuring a minimal call
ahead requirement of one hour.
Achieve a ratio of .65 passengers per mile.
3. Cost Effectiveness
Make efficient use of transit dollars by establishing
cost per passenger at $4.39.
Establish revenue to cost ratio of .13.
C
BUSPLAN: 7/16/90 Page 2
0
LEVELS OF SERVICE
Service Area and Population
The Monticello Heartland Express is intended to service
the population residing within the city of Monticello,
the areas immediately adjacent to the city known as the
Orderly Annexation Area, and a portion of Big Lake and
Becker Townships, which are populated areas lying
adjacent to Monticello across the Mississippi River and
within the Monticello School District boundaries. The
population of the city of Monticello is estimated at
4,500. The Orderly Annexation Area and township area
population is estimated to be 4,000. These areas are
outlined on Exhibit A.
Transportation to the Big Lake Nutrition Center from
points in Monticello will be provided once a day during
the noon hours. Transportation to and from the city of
Monticello will be provided to users of the local
airport, which is located on Highway 25 approximately
.7 miles from the city limits. Transportation to and
from Kjellbergs west Mobile Home Park, which is outside
the city limits, is now being offered. Also,
transportation to churches and businesses located in the
township but directly adjacent to the city is provided at
no added charge. The cost per ride to Kjellbergs West is
$2.00. No other transportation outside the areas
mentioned is anticipated.
Of primary importance is establishment of a
transportation service level that will attract citizen of
Monticello ridership, as the City of Monticello is the
primary source of local revenue for this program.
Therefore, except for service to the Nutrition Center and
airport, extension of transportation service to areas
outside the Monticello city limits will be phased in as
the service demand and concurrent impact on service
delivery becomes better understood. Extension of service
level beyond city limits will be considered by the City
Council when it can be demonstrated that service
expansion will not diminish capability of the system to
offer a desirable service level to Monticello citizens.
In addition, it must be demonstrated that the City
portion of the cost to deliver service to the outlying
areas can be recovered through a combination of user fees
and through added cost efficiency created by now
ridership. At such time that the bus service is expanded
into outlying areas, the City Council of Monticello will
establish bus fares that reflect the added cost of
servicing outlying areas that do not contribute to the
l: local share revenue generated by taxation.
BUSPLAN: 7/16/90 Page
( 2. Type of Service to be Operated
The City will administer through contract a "dial a ride"
service which will feature a minimum one hour call ahead
requirement. The program marketing effort will stress
the importance of calling ahead sooner than one hour
before the ride is needed.
Days of Operation
The City will be providing 2,500 hours of service between
January 1, 1991, and December 31, 1991, which is equal to
10 -hour a day service, five days per week, not including
holidays. At this time, 10 -hour a day service is planned
for Monday through Friday. Initially, days of operation
do not include Saturday and Sunday; however, days and
hours of operation may be adjusted to reflect service
demand experienced. For instance, if it does not appear
cost justifiable to operate on Tuesday between 4:00 p.m.
and 6:00 p.m., those hours might be transferred to
Saturday or Sunday morning. Sunday service might also be
possible in the event that additional funding becomes
available.
In addition, if additional revenue becomes available,
such funds could be used to expand transportation hours.
( The cost to operate the bus beyond the basic 10 -hour day
would be financed entirely by the local share. Source of
such funds might include donations from the Lions Club,
M.S. Society, City of Monticello, or others.
4. Hours of Operation
Service will be provided between the hours of 8:45 a.m.
and 6:00 p.m., which is equal to a 9.25 hour day. The
"extra" or unused 45 minutes of service will be shifted
to the appropriate day and time as service demand is
identified. Also, unused hours may be used in
conjunction with providing extra transportation during a
community event.
C
BUSPLAN: 7/16/90 Page 4
0
D. FARES
The proposed fare structure calls for a base fare of $1.00 per
one-way ride. This fare will apply to all city of Monticello
riders, including elderly, children over the age of 6, and
able-bodied adults. Children under 6 years of age may ride
free with a parent or guardian. Reduced fares will be
available to all potential users of the system through the
purchase of ticket books. Reduced fares can be obtained when
tickets are purchased in bulk through ticket books per the
following table:
Base rate: $ 1.00
10 -ride ticket book $ 7.50 ($.75 ride)
50 -ride ticket book $25.00 ($.50 ride)
Bus drivers will sell ticket books on the bus but will not
make change for individuals paying the base fare.
Ticket books will be sold at a variety of local
establishments, including local retail stores, City Hall, the
Senior Center, the School District, etc. The Senior Center
Director will be responsible for coordinating ticket printing,
distributing ticket books, and collecting ticket book revenue.
Fare structure for outlying areas shall be established by the
City Council at such time that it is determined that it is
feasible to servo outlying areae.
Service to the local airport located in Big Lake Township
shall be provided at the inception of the program, and the
fare for this service shall be twice the standard normal fare
in tickets or currency.
E. MARKETING
A major thrust of the marketing effort will be focused on
the primary users of the system, which are the elderly
and handicapped. Approximately 750 citizens over 60
years of age reside within the city of Monticello, of
which a significant portion participate in programs
offered by the local Senior Citizen Center. This center
will be a major trip destination point and will also be
the primary distribution point for marketing information
regarding the program. Successful development of the
senior market will occur if the Senior Center resources
are properly used in promoting the program. In 1990,
approximately 45% of the users included elderly and
handicapped.
BUSPLAN: 7/16/90 Page 5
C
The remainder of the transit market includes mostly
children. In 1990 it was found that many children
utilized the system in conjunction with after school and
summer recreation activities. In 1990, approximately 378
of the ridership consisted of children. Continued
marketing efforts will be made to communicate the service
to this segment of the population through cooperative
effort with the school district.
Twenty percent of the local households are considered to
be "low income" as defined by the State of Minnesota
Department of Trade and Economic Development. This
represents approximately 340 households within the city
of Monticello. A portion of these households utilize the
bus transportation program for economic reasons. An
additional focus of the marketing effort will include
communicating the program to this group through standard
means and through organizations that have frequent
contact with this segment of the population. Local
social services such as the food shelf, the "WIC"
program, Wright County Social Services, and local
churches will be utilized as the medium by which the
program can be marketed to this special group.
Much of the work force that resides within Monticello
commutes to points well outside the city limits.
2. Marketinq Concept
Standard methods for promoting the transportation system
will be utilized. The City of Monticello will strive
toward development of an efficient marketing program by
utilizing many of the techniques now in place in other
communities. Such techniques may include but not be
limited to the following:
Of primary importance in development of an
advertising campaign is the proper utilization of
the local newspaper. A series of advertisements
will be developed prior to the initiation of the
system.
Continued development and refinement of information
brochures describing the transportation service.
Brochures will be distributed to various
organizations for further distribution.
Dovelopment of an attractive imago by maintaining a
clean and attractive bus. Service image will focus
on providing "coach" service rather than bus
service.
BUSPLAN: 7/16/90 Pago 6
0
Clean and efficient operation of the transportation
service will be goals which will allow the system
to market itself through word of mouth advertising.
Demonstration rides and tours will be given in
conjunction with a moving "open house." It is
expected that presentations will be given to
numerous organizations for the purpose of
describing the program and allowing people to get a
"hands on" feel for the system and its potential.
It is hoped that charitable organizations and the
business community will be impressed with the
program to the extent that they will purchase
blocks of tickets for later distribution to the
elderly and the needy.
• Local schools and the local library will be asked
to participate in marketing availability of service
to youngsters.
3. Marketinq Plan Cost/Benefit
The proposed marketing plan is relatively inexpensive in
terms of cost of advertising and supplies; however, it
does require considerable effort in terms of man-hours.
Much of the marketing effort requires personal contact
and one-to-one advocacy which is likely to reap
significant rewards in terms of ridership. Fortunately,
volunteers and man-hours are available to sufficiently
market the service to groups and service organizations.
F. COORDINATION WITH EXISTING TRANSIT OPERATIONS
The degree in which this program will be coordinated with the
Annandale Heartland Express and the Sherburne County Heartland
Express is not well understood at this point. It is likely
that there will be occasions when a citizen of Monticello
could be transferred to a Sherburne County system vehicle for
transport to points in Sherburne County. This typo of
occurrence might be rather rare. By the same token, there may
be a Sherburne County resident that might wish to be
transported to a drop-off point in the Monticello transit
area, with the Monticello system then transporting the
individual to a specific point in the city. Discussions
between the three transportation providers are now underway
with the goal of improving system integration and efficiency.
BUSPLAN: 7/16/90 Page 7
of,
C
BUSPLAN: 7/16/90 Pago B
The Monticello Heartland Express will be coordinated with an
existing volunteer driver transportation program originating
from Wright County. Coordination of transportation service
will allow volunteer resources to be used for other longer
distance driving duties such as transporting individuals to
metro locations and back.
G.
EXPENSE CONTRACT
(See attached copy of expense contract with service provider.)
H.
REVENUE CONTRACTS
From time to time, requests are made by various organizations
for Monticello Heartland Express service outside the standard
hourE of service. Financing of the hourly cost and mileage of
added service is provided by the organization requesting the
service. Such service is provided to all residents and not
for the exclusive use by the organization requesting service.
I.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
None planned for 1991.
J.
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
The City shall monitor and enforce the terms of the
transportation service expense contract, which includes a
vehicle maintenance program requirement that is consistent
with state requirements. Please see the transportation
service expense contract for details.
K.
DRIVER SELECTION
The City shall monitor and enforce the terms of the
transportation service expense contract, which includes a
driver selection process that is consistent with state
requirements. Please see the transportation service expense
contract for details.
L.
INSURANCE
The City shall monitor and enforce the terms of the
transportation service expense contract, which includes an
insurance requirement that is consistent with state
requirements. Please see Cho transportation service expense
contract for details.
C
BUSPLAN: 7/16/90 Pago B
M. TIME DISTRIBUTION RECORD
The City shall monitor and enforce the terms of the
transportation service expense contract, which includes
maintenance of time distribution records in a manner that is
consistent with state requirements. Please see the
transportation sarvicc expense contract for details.
DUSPLAN: 7/16/90 Page 9�
9
CITY COUNCIL
MONTICELLO TRANSPORTATION
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
POLICY DEVELOPMENT
I
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
MARRETING/PLANNING
SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER DIRECTOR
- Monitor service level
- Distribute tickets/collect
revenue
- Develop senior market
- Daily trip/revenue
accounting monthly report
to State
SUSPLAN: 7/16/90
HOGLUND TRANSPORTATION
- Provide dial -a -ride
transportation service
- Day -today management
- Customer scheduling/
cotmounications
- Provide drivers
- Maintdin bus
- Provide insurance
Page t0
0
(t
Budget
Anticipated statistics
Operating
Expenses
For new Contract
Period
PERSONNEL SERVZc$3
1010
Administrative, Management &
Supervisory Services
7,639
1020
Operator's wages
1030
Maintenance & Repair wages
1035
General office Support wages
3,727
1045
Operations Support wages
1055
Fringe Benefits
1,589
Total
12,456
ADM3N23TRAT2'VE CE9URGE3
1085
Management Fees
1088
Tariffs & Traffic Expenses
1,247
1090
Advertising, Marketing &
1,500
Promotional Charges
1100
Legal, Auditing &'Other
Professional Fees
1105
Security Costs
1110
Office Supplies
1120
Leases & Rentals (Administrative
Facilities)
1130
Utilities
1135
Other Direct Administrative Charges
Total
2,799
VEHICLE CHARGES
1170
Fuel & Lubricants
1180
Maintenance & Repair Material (vehicles)
1185
Contract Service Maintenance Labor
1190
Tires
1195
Other Vehicle Charges
Total
0
OPERATIONS CSAAGSS
1230
Purchase of Service
47,735
1238
Depreciation
1240
Mileage Reimbursement for Passenger
Service
7,745
1243
Repair & Maintenance of Other Property
1246
Leases & Rentals (garages, vehicles, etc.)
1248
Other Operations Charges
Total
55,479
Page
25
7;_6/90
INSURANCE CHARGES
1280 Public Liability & Property Damage
on vehicles
1310 Public Liability & Property Damage
Other than on Vehicles
Total 0
TAXES AND FEES
1350 Vehicle Registration & Permit Fees
1360 Federal Fuel & Lubricant Taxes
1370 State Fuel & Lubricant Taxes EXEMPT
1380 Other Taxes & Fees
Total 0
Page 26
a
1426.TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
70,734
OPERATING REVENUES
1440 Passenger Fares
6,308
1472 Contract Revenues
3,000
1478 Revenues -Other
1490 Other Financial Assistance
1505 TOTAL REVENUES
9,308
1492 Section 9 Federal Operating Grants
CAPITAL EEPENSES
1600 Vehicle
0
1602 Lift, Ramp, Etc.
0
1604 Radio Equipment
0
1606 Farebox
0
1610 Other Capital Expenses
0
1585 TOTAL CAPITAL. EXPENSES
0
1617 FEDERAL CAPITAL GRANTS
0
1619 OTHER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR
0
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
EXPBNSES
1700 Heartland Express Marketing
2,500
L
`
Page 26
a
OPERATING STATISTICS
The purpose of this form is to describe the anticipated operational
characteristics of the participating transit system.
BOURS
1960 TOTAL SERVICE HOURS 2,500
Of this total, how many hours will be:
Regular Route
Demand Responsive 2,500
Route Deviation
Subscription
Contract
Shared Ride Taxi
Volunteer Drivers
MILES
1995 TOTAL VEHICLE MILES 24,998
Of this total, how many miles will be:
Regular Route
Demand Responsive 24,996
Route Deviation
Subscription
Contract
Shared Ride Taxi
Volunteer Drivers
Page 27
Anticipated Statistics
For New Contract Period
PASSENGERS
1830 TOTAL NUMBER OF PASSENGERS
16,225
Of this total, how many passengers
will be:
Elderly
6,681
Handicapped
670
Children
5,947
Free Ride
1,130
ftack i*w General Public
1,797
BOURS
1960 TOTAL SERVICE HOURS 2,500
Of this total, how many hours will be:
Regular Route
Demand Responsive 2,500
Route Deviation
Subscription
Contract
Shared Ride Taxi
Volunteer Drivers
MILES
1995 TOTAL VEHICLE MILES 24,998
Of this total, how many miles will be:
Regular Route
Demand Responsive 24,996
Route Deviation
Subscription
Contract
Shared Ride Taxi
Volunteer Drivers
Page 27
i BUDGET SUKKARY SHEET
I. Capital Expense
TOTAL (From Line 1585) 0
II. Other Expense
TOTAL (From Line 1700) 2,500
III. Operational Expense and Deficit
A. Operational Expense (Line No. 1426)
from Operating Expense Sheet 70,734
B. Less Anticipated Revenue (Line No.
1505) from Operating Revenue Sheet 9,308
TOTAL OPERATING DEFICIT 61,426
lffffff•f ltltf �f lftlf �f�4/fffftttlf•1f•f1//fff 4ffftlf •tffffftttf off ���f
(to be completed by Mn/DOT)
( III. Funding Provided by Applicant
A. % of Capital (must be in cash)
B. % of Total Operating Cost (cash)
TOTAL
IY. Funding from section is Federal Grant
A. % of Capital
B. % of operational Deficit
TOTAL
v. Funding froo 107/DOT
A. % Of Capital
B. Total Operating Coot Less Fixed
Local share Amount and Federal
Operating Dollars.
C. % of Operating
C
D.' _% of Marketing
TOTAL
Page 28 0
MONTICELLO HEARTLAND EXPRESS BUDGET SYSTEM NARRATIVE
Personal Services
The Monticello Heartland Express budget calls for administrative,
management, and supervisory services in the amount of $7,639. This
amounts to 108 of the projected salary of the Assistant City
Administrator for 1990 and 108 of the projected salary of the
Senior Citizens Center Director. In addition, $3,727 has been
allocated for general office support wages, which represents 108 of
the wages of one member of the Monticello support staff.
Fringe benefits in the personal services category amount to $1,589.
Total personal services expense is projected at $12,456.
Administrative Charqes
Under tariffs and traffic expenses, it is projected that the City
will spend $1,247 on tickets to be used in conjunction with the
transportation program. A nominal amount of $52 is included in the
office supply category and $1,500 for advertising, which results in
a total of $2,799 budgeted for administrative charges.
Vehicle Charqes
The Monticello Heartland Express budget does not call for any
vehicle charges, as the transportation service is provided through
a contract with Hoglund Coach Lines.
Operations Charqes
For services delivered in 1991, the City of Monticello entered into
a contract with Hoglund Coach Lines. The contract called for 2,500
hours of transportation service. Although the contract bidding
process is not complete, it is expected that the 1991 cost will not
exceed 1040 of the 1990 figure. Therefore, 1991 operations charge
estimates are based on a 48 increase over 1990. The 1991 budget
for transportation service, including gas and maintenance, amounts
to $55,485. A mileage expense of 16 cents per mile is included in
the operations charge, which is estimated at $7,749. The remaining
sum of $47,755 covers basic transportation service.
BUSBUDGT.NAR: 7/16/90 Page 1
10]
I Insurance Charqes
C
Hoglund Coach Lines, as transportation provider, is required to
provide insurance coverage in the amounts of at least $1,000,000
per claim and at least $100,000 per occurrence. The operator also
provides comprehensive coverage for each vehicle and collision
coverage to provide replacement funds in the event of substantial
loss. MN/DOT and the City of Monticello are included as additional
named insured on the operator's insurance. All insurance charges
are thus paid by the contractor and are part of the purchase of
service fee.
Taxes and Fees
No funds have been budgeted for taxes and fees, as no such expenses
are expected given the design of the Monticello Heartland Express.
Total Operatinq Expenses
Total operating expenses for the Monticello Heartland Express
program during the 12 -month period from January 1, 1991, to
December 31, 1991, equals $70,734.
Operatinq Revenues
It is expected that passenger fares, including revenue contracts,
will amount to $9,308 based on a projected ridership of 16,225 and
a paid ridership of 15,095.
Capital Expenses
Acquisition of a 25 passenger bus is possible for 1990 contingent
on experience gained while operating a leased bus during the
demonstration period. A bus will be purchased if during the
demonstration period it is determined that it makes economic sense
to do so. It is expected that the bus will cost approximately
$42,750. A bus will not be purchased if the cost to operate the
vehicle along with an adjustment to the contract creates an
increaso of over 48 to the 1990 budget.
Budqet Summary
For the 12 -month period from January 1, 1991, to December 31, 1991,
it is expocted that capital expenses will amount to $0.
Oporational expenses will amount to $70,734. Fare revenue will
amount to $9,308, which creates a total operating deficit of
$61,426.
BUSBUDGT.NAR: 7/16/90 Page 2
RZ
�1N��Tq
$ lo Minnesota Department of Transportation Pi
a
p¢ 6
Transportation Building, St. Paul, MN 55155 M hNesOfA IaaO
>OF TVLO
July 5, 1990 Phone (612) 296-1376
Jeff O'Neill
Assistant Administrator
City of Monticello
250 East Broadway
Montic lo, Minnesota 55362-9245
Dear O'Neill:
Enclosed please find the sample request for proposals you requested
X apologize for the delay in getting them to you.
If you have any questions as you develop Monticello's RFPs,
f=eel free to call.
Sincerely,' •+ J
yQdbbff A. Ellison
Project Manager
Transit Program Section
ENCLOSURE
I
An CONW Ornmmnu,
J
Council Agenda - 8/27/90
10. Consideration of authorizing Monticello Heartland Express
(MHE) to begin service 1.5 hours earlier on a pilot program
basis. (J.O.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
As you may recall, the transportation contract with Hoglund
Transportation requires that the MHE contract for a minimum
number of hours annually (2,500). In order to fully use the
minimum number of hours, the system must operate 10 hours per
day. The current program has been operating at a rate of
approximately 9.5 hours per day, which has allowed the MHE to
"bank" enough service hours to allow the system to add 1.5
hours of service to every day through the rest of the year.
It is proposed that the surplus hours be added to the front
end of the day, which would allow service to begin operation
at 7:30 AM. This pilot program will provide the City with the
opportunity to evaluate to what extent citizens will use the
bus to get to work. This information may allow us to
establish a more cost-efficient bus operation schedule. For
instance, if it appears that ridership is exceptional between
7:30 AM and 9:00 AM, it may make sense to operate during these
hours permanently and reduce hours during another segment of
the day when ridership is less intense.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Motion to establish earlier service hours on a pilot
program basis only with pilot program to begin
September 1, 1990, and end December 31, 1990.
A number of surplus hours must be used or they will be
lost. Starting service at an earlier time using surplus
hours will allow the City to test the waters and
determine if a 7:30 AM start makes economic sense.
Motion to deny establishment of earlier service hours on
a pilot program basis.
Sometimes it is difficult to take something away once it
has been started. Evan though this would be a pilot
program, certain individuals may come to depend on the
program, and they could be disenchanted if the pilot
program was not continued. In addition, if it does turn
out to make sense to shift limited system hours, there
will likely be people that are negatively impacted by the
shift. Suffice it to say that there is some risk with
establishing a program that could be pulled later or
t might result in reduction of hours during another part of
the day.
15
Council Agenda - 8/27/90
Establishment of the pilot program could also result in
ridership pressure to operate the system more than 10
hours per day. The State of Minnesota will not fund our
program beyond the present level of service (10 hours per
day); therefore, increase in service level would be
funded entirely by the local share (fare revenue, City).
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the view of MTRAC and City staff that starting bus
service earlier on a pilot program basis makes sense and is
worth the risk of alienating some of the riders when the
program is ended. Given the level of governmental support
relative to user fare revenue, it is important that we
establish a schedule that results in the most cost efficient
system possible. The pilot program as proposed will assist us
in establishing such a schedule.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
None.
C
16
Council Agenda - 8/27/90
11. Consideration of review and approval of Right of First Refusal
Aqreement between the City of Monticello and the H -Window
Company. (O.K.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At the Business Retention and Expansion Breakfast held in
June, Mr. Steve Lemme, General Manager for the H -Window
Company, expressed his belief in the company's capabilities
for national growth. Last year the company expanded
franchises in the states of New York, Pennsylvania,
Connecticut, Michigan, and Colorado; expanded into the
production of patio doors and french doors; and saw their
greatest increase in sales in the month of July 1990. The
company recognizes they made some marketing mistakes in the
first years of operation; however, things have begun to turn
around under the management of Steve Lemme.
In 1987, NAWCO Minnesota, Inc. located in the Oakwood
Industrial Park. The company acquired Lots 11 and 12, Block 2
(approximately 10 acres), with TIF direct assistance for land
acquisition/assessments ($122,200) plus equity ($15,000). An
approximate 29,000 sq ft office/manufacturing facility was
constructed.
The City of Monticello acquired Lots 9 and 10, Block 2,
through a negotiated agreement with the Oakwood Industrial
Partnership. The City subdivided the two lots into six lots,
constructed Dundas Circle, and installed wator/sewer to each
lot. The City has had about one-half dozen inquiries on the
lots in the last two years. The City wants to recover their
costs (land and public improvement costs), but even assistance
of TIF pay-as-you-go on a small project does not make it
attractive to a developer; however, other reasons enter into
final decision-making processes. Currently, a company is
looking at one of the lots, and I have suggested Lot 6.
Mr. Lemme expressed if the company does grow to its projected
capabilities within the next two to three years, they see the
need for a 100,000-150,000 sq ft facility. Assuming one of
the west three lots (Lot 1, 2, or 3, Block 1, Oakwood
Industrial Park Second Addition) sold, this would mean the
11 -Window Company would be land locked. Under such
circumstances, the company would consider relocating their
entire company to a now location outside of Monticello. The
company preference is to have their facility under one roof
and expanded in phases. The Dundas Circle road is a benefit
In the oyes of the H -Window Company, as It would serve as an
alternative route for truck deliveries.
C
Council Agenda - 8/27/90
As with most new businesses, the first five years generally
determines the fate of the company. By the end of December
1991, the H -window Company would be in a better position to
make a decision of whether to acquire additional property, and
they have determined December 1992 as the crucial time for
expansion decision making.
The Industrial Development Committee made a motion
recommending Attorney Tom Hayes draft a Right of First Refusal
for City Council to review and consider. A copy of the
document will be delivered to Steve Lemme for comments. The
IDC felt neither party had anything to lose. The IDC would
not encourage gambling the loss of a company with great growth
capabilities for the sale of one lot. They also recognize
projections are only projections. The City can still market
the three lots to the east of Dundas Circle (Lots 4, 5, and 6,
Block 1).
Enclosed you will find a copy of the Right of First Refusal.
Please read the document, as I didn't comment on the content
because the document wasn't drafted at the time of agenda
preparation. Please review and consider action to enter into
a Right of First Refusal agreement.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
I. Approve entering into a Right of First Refusal agreement
between the City of Monticello and the H -Window Company.
2. Do not approve entering into a Right of First Refusal
agreement between the City of Monticello and the H -Window
Company.
3. Table the agenda item.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff seas no reason to object to the IDC recommendation since
developers haven't boon knocking down city hall doors to
purchase those lots. If approved, this would allow Mr. Lemme
time to forward the document to Norway for review by company
board members prior to their October meeting.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the Right of First Refusal agreement; Copy of a map
ouLlining Lot 1, 2, and 3.
18
` ot?40"
RICHT OF FIRST REFUSAL
L.
For and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good
and valuable consideration, CITY OF MONTICELLO hereby grants to H-WINDDW
COMPANY. a Minnesota corporation, a right of first refusal to purchase the
following -described property or any part(s) thereof:
See attached Exhibit "A"
Upon receipt by CITY OF MONTICELLO of any bona fide written offer of
purchase, CITY OF MONTICELLO shall, by written notice, notify H -WINDOW
COMPANY of said offer by sending said notice first class U.S. mail, postage
paid, to 1324 Fast Oakwood, Monticello, MN 55362.
H -WINDOW COMPANY shall then have 30 days from the date of said mailing
In which to purchase said real property at a price and terms at least as
favorable as those in the original bona fide written offer of purchase. H-
WINDOW COMPANY shall execute their right of first refusal by presenting to
CITY OF MONTICELLO within 30 days of the mailing of the notice of offer of
purchase, a written agreement to purchase said property specifying the some or
more favorablo price and term as called for In the original bona fide written
offer of purchase, together with earnest money in an amount at least equal to
that Called for under the original bona fide written offer of purchnne. Snid
written agreement shall conform substantially to that attached hereto as
Exhibit "D" and shall be executed by authorized officers of H -WINDOW COMPANY.
If II -WINDOW COMPANY does not timely respond to the notice of offer of
purchase, this right of first refusal shall lapse and be of no force and
effect. 11 -WINDOW COMPANY their successors or assigns, shall, if required,
subsequent to the lapse of this agreement, execute a Quit -Claim Dood to CITY
OF MONTICELLO for the above real property.
0
H -WINDOW COMPANY shall not assign this agreement without the written
consent of CITY OF MONTICELLO.
This right of first refusal shall expire, if not otherwise exercised, at
11:59 p.m, on December 31, 1991.
DATED: DATED:
CITY OF MONTICELLO H -WINDOW COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) as.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of
, 1990, by on behalf of the CITY OF
MONTICELLO.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) as.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of
1990, by on behalf of N -WINDOW COMPANY, a
Minnesota corporation.
DRAFTED BY:
Smith 8 Hayes
207 South Walnut Street
P.O. Box 668
Monticello, Minnesota 55362
(612) 295-2107 6 421-7630
c
Notary Public
MZHIBI? •As
Lot 1, Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park Second Addition,
City of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota.
Lot 2, Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park Second Addition,
City of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota.
Lot 3. Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park Second Addition,
City of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota.
( t.dtl115t1 'r. tti ,mv
Ir STANDARD RI, +,•,
Inq.f.N ye... •
PURCHASE AGREEMENT r•ae»« :.„�
MMrwiV . IB —
RECEMO OF
+
the .—.1 ?aamall 1
M nmm+ "OrwY kbedwaWNdau+Ie4 blrnexm QeY oft laepMnm In buff accaput of RnbOtraw
Iwtlen dfUll-I a aetllkd In ya1ftl R+d In pmt fsYma4 1p flee paduse d 114 Well d Irg•fy, fanmlbad n
•+ {Fpiad of Mol Aaf lmil .
City dC.." of Sloe d W -W.,
W.&V mderga,mrlmfandU—.R, Rawaw
rmfift_"I"; tants. stef, dips, felama, sr llcm, xA.W a4des, tdtruft Aadn.
bnxut.df m CftFned.dllpxYyrmoa.a+Inhav,pill. Bn.lmef,.mole.m,haviymlemlmntrRlxr.cynnmetrsw� q
Unnlopt all lJla, iwmlak ombqua
1pR n aquae, with fvalol RRdlm
oom u1. retie leleAsImi apku and cdaalq, 01M1 af5 mbrh.N
axt•xlrtatr, oalape d4pnd, ilMh Ggnq�.im, *"`ML eednq PM" t•NpewRSR yeti, fend I— lFUvw U, insta d =Mfll,. R ANY,
1 Ncmrd conam Pmrdfas Akherithe Pgmty d Seam end also 114 ldWNbV paftld pAb•K
f.
In
II is of xtuk}f Pepuiy Sot IMOR adf flay add R, Buy" IN d4 fvF d:f
1:1
'acme,
i•+
++ WIIc11Buya apnom Plyk n4folkwbq lFaoir�Emlaednaurda me
7r R—shonarbelP!_ . the dRle of tk*kg Rrd r. be."
J dabyM cbq Ma fbiwro
RUHJE
T.
1•t
9J
;0
y..
CI -
;It SUBJEdpl.. .adlFdwM wlddu ml,nidaipmlddb palFplr4rul.
CT TO PntampncFMfi br. BFeerpPRR+roRxpnpF mNlY•Nx4rR.-,.,_�__ �. WRrrcFp ORed,
�+ li M Mrud b, tq ymx,e, i el•y, frxrveytrq mmlmaMF UIN n na pamnes algntt ady k R4 foRorA'ny-mt�IpbmY'
•+ 111 B+ubllrp F14raiBlmn.IFd•4Mn.61ana•d rlemdlpdFlnnftl Nnuinbr4rdnY4Mlnpp MnForFrlgltldlMpmrdsm WNlgrp
xirMye is ti•ItiPFpyiSb+ (i} iiRNFxRYknd inYR 4xRphO nq+WRi iiNddpx tOih!$tNRd MFxxlFpR {4t Ulapyifq®Rb4RR Nimnmth
" Nrt+Khlb uM hMminF wahpmFN bnpwmr4nll tJl Nlalpld lmNnl,BaM
AEAtES IA/I! MEN S#ftf peel ropRY.——11711vrmd bliya SVM too". — / 121hf of laser do mdpeykAR blow yea
I' I Slmm or" le Ply., ...._ a 121to and Byrn Owen b ay � .�.. / 12110 of Rlxaxll M ovenyq d spedit a WfvFFpf IM
ird oeysMi a Na Ynl IR _ _.._ _ patio m _ •-_. m Itr 11tl! d fLWlp b races enefsnlnM! kxld adpfrdxy
ti„ BUM mile IW IR•en dua ane payMbro k the yra IB .,_ end any falp•id butlBnufm of gmW aa/mmmapa pnV*bls aa.Fdm
dl 0n0 px 00, Ball wmrmUR put UM, do and pfYeMempu Ysm t6„T ..� wlMb ., hR14uaid
4. ftaafdieVi n NWW Baal Illi SalkyYApai mita alyrprRfenatlentprcrfuil'au ano\nld MlRe rnRt esfaN iaM.
11 WABBANIIEB RlBa 4alanu Ihm bldbmps, 11 pry, i+F mgNat xNlMrl N4 lleusalav kros d aM pemhn! Beam wenanF Ole as
.++ as>humlrai.IxauN+aadRNtmxkkldnp,xYNRlamdpur�hlryuulm4a,cn.dmmRpmnlmimiblPRamwo+.Ntyppaa,daidtkw
f
BUM iuRllylgtRYlsprtNranpFnpipr mtkiby Buym duauthryhinuiUi7xagRRNJRtixF eyrFnn Nun aNFigdvcmhettigmdaZ
faltlmolllr+B, wtrNa mxlrAxlnFry as k prRK, xxpYpp aNrx Idnx fbaBrR 6aam wallimi 0u1 pu PFndim me rnemrted m <yrRRwer
t1yen. ttIIF.flh+riNrtf yM-tyfn ,114 we
Mr7 aMtf Peifib kay ,bfib Slow ftrae Rd f too rsufa t4tPe pro
tilllm0 daft+, lidr aaiaFaF/N4ahaVnl 1pA pfd gdaBlrnv tfprp6lud the emf4a uu41pq 6n returdalb Bullet
n•' pglfF,{BIONOFIa swan le 141hm ppfrllssbn not Mla lhml.,_� -- �. _
Vi AN toltw so of mxlfmxilMupi,Wcq{cMty pndrWwRipaldur ,bretRNmdIpRM{iFdatewn9f pMRIrN aRPerttidllFN+epn 11..1 iurtklald. _ _—__.,�,eyam fgreef 1plmllaYf a6 dstMNRMla lfafaul Pfaurry nd bcbded i4ret+Nam tlu
iT PnnmeF belp•rymnskn tMN
++ ttTrt 6 ExAMiNANON Baha dIW, wRha s +anpn�le tsrr aRm acaolanre of N+h gtf4mmn. NFINlii M AMpan d tilts, u a
•i AryliffaMAtpmhAt4baf.fmtifiadrodltaroNltklNpg4r MmfMfpRlbytRll4rgNC4i,§nroRMlPlmnipldplxnrcapMReq Buym
' MFR bII Rlfnwm110dAinnf rlaYr atlM lapipl 1. OMMMdI kndlNNald na/NIR Nry MIIMPlIefildta{1MNfJII1MYFIkMNFptllmalxd
+ Mn.wi ft fdaa'd,but 14.1 Iwi.. of Fall, .1.6
yipmRaRiM 010, -qts PNY1n1ffP+FflalndltlM piq+mgf lxxYptda
•,J IalnYed maR M p111FprUxd, illp IflfiIIM k Ml bU l d idhl ard,aA,4 TO dayl aBm 4latFn rxFkF b AtF*rf Ha i4rfMi a "Irtt"ma tidy
•' aarlFinaNarflxd,glOMIarM
If IIINnu4l aRrinid wNlmulHtdlyl lrmlll4Mu Mvn Fdn pi}+1�'n.11Nx FPnllnx•Ip nVFBYn91mx1
FI, Ft riFFF+d IFFfF, FFxIpF IWtY pup by Mfw fP d.=1 --da o ila w—, pa MFr4m nxruv 111aN bIt IMIn1a14RIFa
I, Ur rAUlt ttupFnn,mixiMRaixrnumtal YMfian NbtYrm,Fnp Rayer gRtRNn kpr+yditnppl+afpnps iquFet,Ealm magtanFWRthix
r FplAnwrM m4nlarinlxFadhm FNI4N11atlFInYMIgFUIYF•aaah111a11N4d N11 RFMI pmIANmq lYllaY n•fpFllMYtlaYNnnMYlllml+a
r nlRFdnq+'pdaI4PF.1YnGtebpd1141FM+rRIwmY llNprwxb,NWItRFFIgMslywMbU1p41 WYRdadnfF�N4RixcNRpFYxxxnxx
' dihnimemn•n PraNMNNR•w••r•4•+t n141tfnuxtr4lafmdalwnapeaterpRNic Prlaaarx4rtx+Fl•mrfxtwtltNnW u,mMFhn
u,t nrr fiuglul pl aflYaellnM In Ila 10M Buys dNa4l•In fill rxllld_M'e Mrhe lelmf nl it'll AaufM11FlN FId NpIke Ml�pFRNla+11IN
`+ sal Yed upbn Ne0ulal ppfRuaq l0 MBA 95B B hm:IFIIIIInlllmr pnfod "W"be ddlly 1101 o""'S penrFllid try rll di"I"I m lel "Ar
} i ytip t
1111CC pIANCe Bufa Iuaanllsnda anprwl4aIMINdR uk IRamMH ti me•01lIIIf MMRmkwobbly Aailn bopts Nmgea IfgIFNlbI!
.! al1 aapowN d ep!lwnn4rp, axFFpl a Imunw atlmaM IP Nn Rp Ma mPNy
AQfNCY Ni{Ct01U66 -- ItpIWnR M a au NfiPRRmNq 1M _ - -
.n N 1hlr bMrN11M.IM aWq aMn a aafll aaallN4• M a ON If IRMlNFIay M NM IF, ails UM WIkM,
"1 1. ft. Fwna d Stu! M•III/FINS, altW AIII aplavul. Rud ilwaR Nauaflaal lll•p•IItlRM IF. P4ladmgr M+Mad
•J Ifm •Rn holow Faft aalllgb4 na falh ah"
,f srurA, -- - - - I BUYrA-
Ja IFur6,_ _ _ .- ._ SUy" _
." Oaa.myM am pilaf vw-- l twbo, fgdlal R4 sNIWd
CwrMIM . - _ - - - .� .—. _ _ . SO*V AMM ., - - - - .
.
' AAlfm _ , - _ .. __ - Cbz — a -
..••...m •.en.I,ualMol•In MRltBarf IF NOr uNtlPll)1rflOfl AQQIICOMt'P.IPNI AOYICQ,
��
Council Agenda - 8/27/90
12. Consideration of counter-offer on purchase agreement for
Property adlacent to city hall. (R.W.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At the last Council meeting, authorization was granted to the
staff to prepare a purchase agreement offering $50,000 for the
purchase of the 122 -foot X 165 -foot residential parcel
adjacent to the city hall property. A purchase agreement was
prepared and presented to Mr. Dale Lungwitz at the Wright
County State Bank for their consideration.
Mr. Lungwitz noted that the bank's principal loan balance on
the property is approximately $53,000; and with additional
interest and cost associated with the foreclosure, they were
asking $57,000 to break even. They realize that if they were
to sell the property through a realtor at this price, they
would Incur realtor's fees which would result in approximately
a net sale of $53,000. The board of directors reviewed our
offer and decided to counter-offer our purchase agreement at
$53,000. Mr. Lunqwitz indicated the bank would be willing to
sell the City the property for $53,000 which would allow them
to at least get back their original loan amount, not counting
Interest and expenses.
Unfortunately, the cut-off date for the City acquiring
property and claiming tax exempt status was August 1, 1990.
The property in question will be non -homestead, and the City
would be responsible for approximately $1,500 in real estate
taxes in addition to the acquisition price. This would be the
case even If the City immediately demolished the home; but for
the years 1992 and thereafter, the City would not be required
to pay any real estate taxes to hold the property.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Reject their counter proposal and indicate a willingness
to only pay $50,000 per previous Council action.
2. Accept their counter proposal of $53,000.
3. Make our own counter proposal somewhere betwoon $50,000
and $53,000.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The staff does not have a recommendation one way or the other.
If the City owned the property, wo may be able to utilize all
or a portion of the property for future expansion of our
parking lot needs, but I believe we could still expand without
19
Council Agenda - 8/27/90
this property for quite a number of years. I personally don't
know if the bank is willing to sell the property for less than
$53,000, but they may be willing to consider another offer.
The appraisal submitted by Jack Maxwell estimated the value of
the property at $55,000. Since the seller would not incur the
normal 7% sales commission of a realtor, an offer of $51,500
may be reasonable if the Council wishes to make another offer
below their proposal.
None.
C
SUPPORTING DATA:
20
Council Agenda - 8/27/90
13. Consideration of garbage/refuse ordinance amendment. (R.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Our current ordinance relating to garbage/refuse service rates
was established in 1989 as a result of our recycling program.
The ordinance established a service charge similar to our
penalty system in effect for sewer and water billings, which
Indicated a penalty of $1.00 plus 19 per month would be added
to the billing for those property owners who received a
special processing fee billing if they did not recycle. The
section of the ordinance covering this penalty charge is
7-6-9(A).
With our recent conversion of our data processing to BRC
software, the City will soon be converting our utility billing
system to this new software. The present system of adding a
$1.00 base charge plus 18 per month for any unpaid delinquent
bill has become very cumbersome and may be difficult to
maintain on our new system. The staff is currently reviewing
the software program; but in order to provide an easier
system, It appears that the staff will be recommending both
the garbage/refuse penalty and the sewer and water penalty
systems be altered and calculated on a quarterly basis to
coincide with our billing cycle. In other, words, it will be
much easier to eliminate the $1.00 charge and 18 interest and
institute a flat 38 or 48 charge one per quarter. By using a
quarterly charge of 48, any utility bill and/or garbage bill
that is unpaid by the due date would have this charge applied
to their unpaid balance, and the City staff would not have to
daily calculate when the bill is actually paid.
Our current. ordinance relating to sewer and water billings
lndicatos that a penalty may be charged by the City at a rate
to be determined. Since our garbage ordinance specifies the
actual $1.00 base amount plus 1% per month, It is recommended
that this ordinance be amended by allminating the actual $1.00
charge and just indicate that a penalty shall be added if the
amount is 30 days late. Before the staff actually institutes
a now system, i will bring our recommendation to the Council;
but It appears at this time that having two different types of
ponalLioe is not feasible with our computer Bystom.
R. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Adopt the ordinance amendment as proposed eliminating the
specific mention of a $1.00 charge plus 1% per month.
2. leave the ordinance as is.
21
L
C
Council Agenda - 8/27/90
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
In reviewing the computer software system with Cathy Shuman,
it is apparent that a penalty system plus an interest charge
will be cumbersome to maintain. Most communities utilize a
basic flat fee or percentage of the unpaid bill as a penalty,
and I believe utilizing a flat percentage once per quarter
would accomplish the same goal and be less cumbersome. In
order for the wording to coincide with our sewer and water
ordinance, I recommend the garbage/refuse ordinance be amended
by deleting specific reference to the penalty amount.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of proposed ordinance amendment.
22
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS THAT ORDINANCE
SECTION 7-6-9(A) RELATING TO GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE RATES BE
AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:
7-6-9(A) Amend the last paragraph to read:
Garbage/refuse bills will be mailed to the owner, leasee,
or occupant for each quarter year service period at the
rates established by City Council. The proceeds from the
collection of these bills shall be placed in the general
fund to offset the cost of garbage/refuse service,
special processing and disposal fees, operation of the
City's recycling service, and the leaf collection
service. A penalty o4 -S1 09-f4us-49.-pax-4soa" shall be
added to the amount due on any bill if not paid within 30
days after the billing date. Payments received or
postmarked on or before the 30th day after billing shall
be deemed as paid within said period.
Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of August, 1990.
City Administrator.
C
Mayor
0
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
-OJ-/.2..t3n ... c
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
jGENERAL'-CHEC9IN0
-30.1. � n,�25/-sO-MN--06RARS-O�NA�FI&Al
„-1buasewewi-aou--- 1
OESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVOI,
"? '.'AxERGRAFZ. AT--V-REG -200-.-00
•30142
07/25/90
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
222
FEDERAL W/H
2.014.32
--30142�.7J25/80-WASGHS- COUNTY-STl`T°
40-.-6e
30142
07/25/90
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
222
HRA FEDERAL W/H
92.36
30142
07/25/'9990
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
222
HRA FICA W/H
04.16
7 9
-3ZAIL7-42540
WR-IGKT-X-`aUNTV STAT-
-'f
fu
.e, 1.
30142
07/25/90
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
222
WATER FICA W/H
271.02
30142
07/25/90
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
222
SEWER FEDERAL W/H
65.57
--3A.L4_2-01%25�II0-WR.I.GH.tCOUNZK-t3.!'rf
e�1k
•'�s�30
30142
07/25/90
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
222
BUS FEDERAL W/H
20.49
30142
07/25/90
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
re
222
-1
BUS FICA W/H
MGOSGAR.i--W/u
34.76
-3
30142
07/25/90
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
222
FIRE MEDICARE W/H
6.59
30142
07/25/90
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
222
LIBRARY FEDERAL W/H
2.25
_ -30].4 1 02/_1.;i.n YRS_GHZ-COUNSY--STA"
???
LICRARM FICA Wu
--
30142
07/2S/90
WRTGHT COUNTY STATE
222
TREE FEDERAL W/H
103.66
30142
07/25/90
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
222
TREE FICA W/H
145.50
uLCK--TDZA4-
30143
07/25/90
COMMISSIONER OF REVE
36
STATE W/H
1.614.55
_-. 30.1,-3 OlA4s/80-COMMISSI0NER-01--11V
30143
07/25/90
COMMISSIONER OF REVE
36
STATE W/H
77.44
30143
07/25/90
COMMISSIONER OF REVE
38
STATE W/H
27.95
_ 30 - 2 02425.1-90 COMM4-"ION&A OF
2 141 0
30143
07/25/90
COMMISSIONER OF REVE
36
STATE W/H
0.04
43
07/25/90
COMMISSIONER OF REVE
36
STATE W/H
42.61
1107-.-2-6-aCH€GK-T-0T•A6--
30144
07/25/90
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET
176
PERA /WH
1.421.03
/2S/$II-0.UB LI G-0AW-0X,&"6-T----1_4 PERA %W
'9+-0?
30144
07/23/90
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET
176
PERA /WH
153.15
30144
07/25/90
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET
176
PERA /WM
59.55
.-__3.01b), V./.25/-80-PU6LIC-EMPlOYfrEB_R1-
.,n
PEA, iuu
e0-4)"
30144
07/23/90
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET
17S
PERA /WH
1.11
30144
07/25/90
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET
176
PERA /WH
82.13
30145
07/25/90
A.E. MICHAEL$
338
STAIN/ELLISON PK SHEL
159.17
30166
07/25/00
ANDER$ON/GARY
11
TRAVEL EXPENSE
05.82
,A1e.7 n1/11%,"M AUJ.OMA.Tie, rVCTrMc cA 919 Q.1 -Q" CWADTC/IJATrn n • --
30140 07/25/90 BRAUN ENGINEERING 259 CONS TESTING/MEADOWS 859.00
30149 07/25/90 ELK RIVER VETERINARY 52 ANIMAL CONTROL FEES 13.50
ERC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
I(ARRANT DATE VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
CLAIM INV01
GENERAL CHECKING
1
J/
—a0-tii0--b 7-f? JF9 "� 5 . 1
S
37.1.5
30150 07/25/90 FEEORITE CONTROLS, I
56 CHLORINE & MISC SUP 2.300.13
30150 07/25/90 FEEDRITE CONTROL-$. I
56 MISC SUPPLIES
20.00
?8
311£S't 787th
30151 07/25/90 GME CONSULTANTS. INC
341 TESTING/7TH ST PFJ
464.00
30152 07/25/90 HOGLUND BUS COMPANY
82 PARTS/STREET DEPT
5.40
—30+53-0Nf45f90-HOL-ID*Y-@REC17 s3":=
85-GAS/FIRE 0--rT
7C•7C
30154 07/25/90 HOLMES & GRAVEN
86 PROF SER/K MART PROJE
270.80
—30+54-O? / 2Sf90-HOt-MC- 9 &-6RAVEN
8:
-ir=
302.30
•CHECK TOTAL
----30i35-*7/25/90- dON-6OGAnT
33: TRAYEt: EX?EN :
C.1:
30156 07/25/90 KOROPCHAK/OLIVE
97 MILEAGE EXPENSE
39.75
•--31.66--044464-90-KOROPGHA94OWYE
2' MI+CAacE EXPENS:
3*C8
47.75
*CHECK TOTAL
--- 90 }59-045f90-MAR£O-BUSfNE3rP9
7
936.0=
-
30157 07/25/90 MARCO BUSINESS PRODU
106 TVPEWRITTER RIBBONS
71.34
871.39
*CHECK TOTAL
30158 07/25/90 MID CENTRAL. IN C.
113 PARTS FOR DUMPER/FIRE
130.00
30-1-59-04-/4590-MOBIL—
:3' 3AGr"vE�F[-R 60EbEfi
90
�--
30159 07/25/90 MOBIL
131 GAS/MATER DEPT
47.88
30159 07/25/90 MOBIL
131 OIL/WATER DEPT
3.74
---304 9-0-7-/-25A0O-MOBI_
'3' Stab STREET DE77
-C,: .,
105.21
*CHECK TOTAL
---30.1BD-07-/'25/8O-MONT-ICELL•O-PfHPOfHN
1'7-bu
30161 07/25/00 MONTICELLO TIMES
140 LEGAL PUBLICATIONS
844.37
3016^I-07f24990-44ONT-FCEELO- -1 C-S
1*0 BED -PfRM-lT-N9FECES--60x00
30161 07/25/90 MONTICELLO TIMES
140 COMPOSITE & RECVCL INF
71.50
30161 07/25/90 MONTICELLO TIMES
140 PUBLIC HEARING ADS
51.09
= 8016-1--07/25/90-MONTICEL-LOTIMES
IbO--Btli eR ti _P-WAwTiO-AD--34-x50
30161 07/25/90 MONTICELLO TIME$
I40 WATER PRESSURE INFO
52.90
j 30161 07/25/00 MONTICELLO TIMES
140 LIBRARV/89 BOUND NEWS
150.00
1
068x96^ i6HE@N-Ti3TAl
30162 07/25/90 NORTH STAR WATERWORK
152 WATER REDUCING VALVES
500.01
y
30163 07/25/90 O.E.I. BUSINESS FORM
158 COPY MACHINE PAPER
113.15
'
1
' 6RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
VARRANT DATE VENDOR
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
CLAIM INVOI
GENERAL CHECKING
-•--3O-S64-0.7¢24/80-O4 NE16LA4E-F
'S'
AVcL: E+.TET'CE '8r80
--
30165 07/25/90 OLSON & SONS ELECTRI
180
LITE BULBS/LIBRARY 58.20
•--•30165-07-oLn/-00-01
TC 60.15
--
30165 07/25/90 OLSON & SONS ELECTRI
160
MTC & REPAIRS/WATER D 922.02
30165 07/25/90 OLSON & SONS ELECTRI
160
MISC SUPPLIES/WATER 7.16
LO.1$5-07-/-25,49O "ON it SON$-,, ec
40-0^-
30165 07/25/90 OLSON & SONS ELECTRI
160
ALARM SYSTEM MTC 179.12
1,277.25
*CHECK TOTAL
30168 07/25/90 ORR-SCHELEN-MAVERON
162
ENG FEES/TAPPER PRJ 132.19
30166 07/25/90 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
162
ENG FEES/REMMELE PRJ 105.75
30168 07/25/80 ORR-SCHELEN-MAVERON
162
ENG„FEES/SANDBERG E 1.343.82
30166 07/25/90 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
162
ENG'.FE'ES/MEADOWS PRJ 972.49
.. -_3.0_1 AS 07925490 ORR-ZCHE"N-MAy4aON
ia,
uT r -Ro- cenvtrg_q_-4,,7-W-.an
_
30166 07/25/90 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
162
CTY RD 39 FEES 343.69
30168 07/25/90 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
162
WATER RESERVOIR REP 0.42
0 Gal 9a
•rucry TnTAI
30167 07/25/90 PHILLIPS 68 COMPANY
167
r
GAS/STREET DEPT 51.04
30168 07/25/90 SAL2WEOEL/PATTY
185
ANIMAL CONTROL CONTRA 463.25
---30-L69--07.4,31910 4wiRg"
4,1W 's -r.
70 07/25/90 SMITH & HAVES
194
MISC LEGAL FEES 815.44
4.7.0_01/.26/J30-SMT-TH-B MAVE6
'9'.-i6GA6 6666,114 1A44--�66.95
30170 07/25/90 SMITH 8 HAYES
194
LEGAL FEES/TAPPER PRJ 466.65
30170 07/25/90 SMITH & HAVES
194
LEGAL FEES/WWTP 48.00
---34.370 0 3 / 115 /40-4MSIJ7--t 41A1RE'
0
M666 pa --t4"^
1.714.64
*CHECK TOTAL
--.30174.-07{26/00-4PQiNGSTED, iNCO
EA06W-1 }6T3'
----_
30172 07/25/90 WATER PRODUCTS COMPA
218
METERS.VALVES. ETC 2.462.25
...i 0 t.21 O711S1-0C .MASER-RROCIJC
3.208.64
*CHECK TOTAL
GENERAL-•CMGCKING
'^'A% 331490v86
BRC FINANCIAL 4VSTFM
08/07/90 13:46:09 Disbursement Journal 1
WARRANT DATE -(f NDOR _ nFRr P.IPTTnN �nnur ri -�ypl�
GENERAL CHECKING
30173 07/31/80 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 118 WATERCRAFT/ATV/SNOW R 111.00
__ OEN_ERAI. CHEC;KICi0 TnTAI i i L_O.n
BFC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
�I_Q8L9OA
G ;RANT DATE VENDOR
n 4 Ahu jAMjMt_jAur nA 1
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVC
GENERAL CHECKING
�I1 _ 3_QL7P1L8/02/90
MN DEPART OF NATIJRAI
119
WATERCRAFT/ATV/.$NOW R
133.0n
;l 30175
08/10/90
ADOPT -A -DET
4
ANIMAL ADOPTIONS
230.00
30176
08/10/90
AUTO -OWNERS INSURANC
343
RENTAL HOUSE INS PREM
184.00
9
3.0j 7 7
OB/10/90
BOSELTOM
»®
MT A. XPENSF
55 nn -
'I
�I30178
08/10/90
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
641.13
In-
06/in 90
BUDg E}L_TFR TFLFPHnN
74
TFLFPHnNF rH6BnFS
Q7=47
_
30178
08/10/90
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
24,TELEPHONE CHARGES
67.14
30178
08/10/90
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
24:TELEPHONE
CHARGES
28.48
30,178—P9LgL9-0-_EtB-IP.GEYkUR
TELEPHON
74
-7ElEPHONE CHARGES
62-25 _
30178
08/10/90
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
102.77
e 30170
08/10/90
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
20.00
017q
OB/10/9p_p_g IPff �%tAjE_R TELEPHnN
74
TFLFPHONF CHARGFS
11.50
30178
08/10/90
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
38.79
r
.� 30178
08/10/90
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
20.0
�. _30178 n9/10/9n
Ft1Z1 KAT R T PHON
74
TF1 FPH0UE CHARGES
-36.7A -
'� 30170
09/10/90
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
39.97
30178
08/10/90
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
10.00
9n17R
nB/10/90n RR1Or"ATFR T 1 PHn1J
711
TFLFPHONF CHAR�,FS
in, ft
r
1,184.48
*CHECK TOTAL'
'r ��, J17R
,_ .
OB/10/90
aE$OS [0
BN_$TNFSj to
4 7
PAYROLL CMFKS & FnRM 841.11
r
1f 30180
4
08/10/90
CORROW SANITATION
42
GARBAGE CONTRACT P 12.146.67
;P 30191
08/10/90
DECISION DATA SERVIC
47
COMPUTER MTC AGREEMEN
234.00
'•;) .30.36-2 0BL 1DL 40
G9L LIl.BRO"- tHFV-OLn
7G
REPAIRS - FIRF nFPT
717 R7
30183
08/10/90
HAVES/WILMA
265
INFO CENTER SALARY
190.01
IJ_L4La__ji
_U24hILl1!
7115
TNFO CENTER SALARv
f;UnrR -
s
91
130.13 *CHECK TOTA!
301 /,J01-90
a,
HERMESLJERRY
•1
ITRRARY eALAPv
727_sn
>� 30185
08/10/90
HOGLUND TRANSPORTATI
04
HEARTLAND BUS CONTR 4.934.33
-30100
09/10/90
LEERSSEN/JANETTE
204
INFO CENTER SALARY
106.00
i, 30106
00/10/90
LEERSSEN/JANETTE
204
INFO CENTER SALARY
40.75CR
ArHECX__=TAL
u
0 30107
08/10/90
LONG LANE FORD TRACT
311
SHAFT/BEARING-STREET
702.32
30100
00/-10/00
LUKACH/JOHN
327
MILEAGE EXPENSE/DARKS
b5.00
30100
00/10/90
LUKACH/JOHN
327
MILEAGE EXPENSE/CITU
H 45.00
30100
00110/90
LUKACH/JOHN
121_KILEAGE
EXP.LrWEILIORAR_10.73
30180
00/10/90.LUKAC11/JOHN
327
MILEAGE EXPENSE/FIRE
H 10.72
11
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
-aaLjw SI 15 •h1cn�� r_abjL/.... nt .Innr•nwl
u
.t WARRANT GATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM NYC
GENERAL CHECKING
1e 1 1. a *—ry rnT4L
�+
30189 OB/10/90 MANKATO TECHNICAL CO
346 GRADER OPERATOR SCH00 190.00
9I
30190 06/10/00 MENTH SOD A LANDSCAP
342 SOD /PARKS
49.00
t'2010, 08./" S-.Klowry GAS-CONPAN•Y
11C [ITTI TTT
In ea
L
30191 08/10/90 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
115 UTILITIES
3.00
.�
30191 08/10/90 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
115 UTILITIES
22.65
r' an.e [yy,1(,gyJq ID LLE SZ --GAS rDM°ANY
;1A NrTI TTTae
•e JP
30191 08/10/90 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
115 UTILITIES
5.47
1,
r.�
30191 08/10/90 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
115 UTILITIES
5.83
A.
na/+n/ao MTnVF�T_uea rnMoauv
Ila nTrITTTea
1a nl _
9r
tr
.Drat
72.97 *CHECK T07A1
�.
!,8•A MINN FrnILQMl _fty VPL
lhl CFMTNAR FFF
R - On
rr
1cro
'•.�
lit
30193 08/10/00 MINNESOTA ANIMAL CON
117 SEMINAR REO/ANIMAL
CON 40.00
1'�I1
30194 08/10/90 MINNESOTA U.C. FUND
130 UC BENEEFITS/A HANKEN 199.71
ao13, In/9n MIJ�,F PA RT CI NATIIRAI
1tR u hr ForRFAL,�Y_SN.OW R L3. _nn_19 -'
*
30190 06/10/90 NORTHERN STATES POWE
148 UTILITIES
3,414.08
'T..iD_156...02/-LO/90_.CIRTHERN.
STAY, RnWE 14R 1irrITTT00
',BR -Tp
30196 08/10/90 NORTHERN STATES POWE
148 UTILITIES
3,059.11
rr
3019-8 00.8,/'10/90 NORTHERN STATES POWE
148 UTILITIES
64.05
D.19 Ft nA L0/9D-NDRTN EAtL •TATEC O01LE
1hR I1TT1 TTTFC
yf.7 AR _
_3
30106 08/10/90 NORTHERN STATES POWE
148 oT•ZLITIES
01.20
ii
30190 00/10/90 NORTHERN STATES POWE
148 UTMLITIES
201.25
q1
SIATEt_pOWE
."A NTXAt=cc
.2-9,
_ .301II6_.00/LD/�O�NDRIHERN
30196 00/10/90 NORTHERN STATES POWE
140 UTILITIES
244.07
:r.
30196 08/10/90 NORTHERN STATES POWE
148 UTILITIES
210.3]
•,�OL96
OB/1D/.9II�1DR211ER11 STATES DAVE
IhR IITTI ITTCS
sDg_04
�I
30196 08/10/90 NORTHERN STATES POWE
148 UTILITIES
970.73
�tl
10.070.53 *CHECK TOTA
(ol
30197 00/10/00 NORWEST INVESTMENT S
155 COMPUTER PAYMENT
2.407.01
�I
30.1.90..A0/..III4ACi-P4TL:3A1 E! 11 MARMTI
11' REALEC4CIU.SON.—J.X—SWr I,3,D..,.4D_�� —..
nl
30199 00/10/90 POLKA DOT RECYCLING
170 RECYCLING CONTRACT
1,193.02
°
3020000/10/90 PROFF.33IONAL SERVICE
175 WW TP CONTRACT PAVM
20,405.17
0
30200 00/10/90 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
175 WW TP CHGl/DEPREC/UP
1,200.00
-
v
30201 00/10/00 OUIST/RANDY
.00070 IIECYCLINO PRIZE
70.00
,i BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
r` �0 in7lan tacr,tcna
ct
ARRANT DATE VENDOR.
r^� GENERAL CHECKING
r4 (X7 n 9 0$4L0L90_RYiE....A SS.00S.A T F S
30203 08/10/90 SALZWEOEL/PATTY
t.t
"I 30204 08/10/80 SHARE CORPORATION
ca�
c- �n9ns nA/tn/an 4SMctN SON ItIMRaR rnma
30205 08/10/90 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP
incl 30205 08/10/90 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP
�co
'n- 30206 08/10/90 WADENA SAW MILLS
'lF 30207 08/10/80 WOLFSTELLER/RICHARD
r,
`•r 30209 08/10/90 YONAK LANDFILL. INC.
or
Lv
-r GENERAL CHECKING
u
ct
n
GL
n
rt
ni4h,-.Ip mnn+ .Inl,rnwt �.
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM IN'.
iA4 RQQ-lFCX TRAM 15n FYPF 9Sn nn
185 AN CONTROL & ADOPTION 509.25
r
281 LUBRICANT/ACID-STREET 235.78
loa RI cuPA1,�FS/croccTa I" a
193 LANDSCAPING MATERIALS/ 43.94
t93 BLD REPAIR SUPPLIES/PK 14.95
Al 07
.90069 $TAKES/LATHE-STREET D 145.50
217 MONTHLY MILEAGE ALLOW 300.00
223 ADO'L LANDFILL. CHAR 6.731.55
TOTAL 74.348.74
•fHFfK TnT�
RFC F)t1ANCIAL SYSTEM
08/15/90 13:56:36
VAPRANT OATE VENOOC�!
GENERAL CHECKING,
29392 OE/14/90 MN DEPART OF NATURAL
2939? 08/14/70 MN DEPART OF NATtIPAL
20535 08/14/00 AUTI:.MATION SUPPLY
29535 OB/is/90 M3 OSOAPT OF H4TURAL
79721 OE/vI/9O wrr 4F.:+CT 07 Ni"fUR+I.
?577• 0"/+L/70 N•: •1C rtATI!P.At
30204 08/116/90 SHARE CORPOPATIg-N
30204 08/14/90 SHA.^E C•6FIPOPATION
30209 08/14/90 ANOKA COUNTY SOCIAL
30710 08/14/90 U.S. POSTMASTER.
30210 08/14/90 U.S. POSTMASTER
3C211 08/14/90 PHIPPS/DAV10
30711 08/14/90 PHIPPS/DAVID
3021? 08/15/90 A T 8 T INFO SYSTEMS
30213 09/15/90 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL
30214 00/15/90 AME REAriv MTr
C1)7t5 00/19/20 +"+"P:tC^N ,jarICfJAL P4
30`Ij 09/•0/^O tr-:0 -.lN 11e7I1)l AI FIA
301/G, 0'./15/90 SEN FPANr LItt
?02i3+07itg%aq� I•) ; tNkLtN
?0?1, 93/t5/99 pgrl FFtNvLtN
eI
118 CORRECT LEDC-ER POST IN 181.00
'1 30717
08/15/90
SEPGSTROM SPOS. INC
m
118 CORRECT VEN04R POST IN 788.00
30210
e
08/15/1)0
t,05C/ TOM
n 30719
0141,/)0
flPAuN ENCIVIEERING
30220
06/15/90
BUFFALO BITUMINOUS.
Oi`b7r Aemint J?urnAl
OESCRIPT1ON AMOUNT LLAT �)Fr'•
118 CORRgCT LEQGEP PO-TaN IpI,QQrP
118 CORRECT LEDC-ER POST IN 181.00
0.00
•CHEC! TC•:'A
18 CORRECT VENDOR POSTIN 289.0008
118 CORRECT VEN04R POST IN 788.00
F1. Mn
-rHCCV • A—, I
119 CORRECT LEO!:ER c•OS rIN n1S, O-)Cp
1 is r^V OFrT 1 CnC-CO OA' TI nr.
0.00
'CI1FC C T.J'A
3?1 AQJUST POSTTN3 QN R/10 Sn.A/.
281 ADJUST POSTJNO Orr 3/10
0.00
'CHECv n;" t
14 PAYROLL OEOUCTIOYS 112.48
210 §E1+Eg/VATgP. PQ$TAGE 138.49
210 SEWER/WATER POST+C,E 139.30
770.57
lfCHECt Tra' f,
.90074 REFUND ON RECYCLING 91 25.58
.90074 REFUND ON RECYCLING, VIN 1.57
15 FIRE PHONE CMARG�S 3.90
3 ANIMAL CONTROL/CITY MA 50.00
0 REPAIRS/4HOP 4:.77
•�-
1 1900 P G.O. C30:+0 ISS 507.50
7 1999 A 0.0• 'O'•4 IS' a-n•On
1.317.50
r-;MF.CV tOT
20 FILM/SIDE VALV F'p61ErT 1e.06
_,
20 SUPPLIES/T;4M'150 1?.75
20 SUPPLIES/SHOP 2.00
A l . T,1
•. HC. k {�; • •
71 RIVETS/NOSE-STREETS 0.30
336 MILEAGE E7PENr E 71.50
24P FtIQ FFFSIMFADOi:� TI D 179 Ort
25 CLAN.OjSTREET DEPT 702.00
5,
�` SDC. FINArICIAI SYSTEM
03/15/90 13:56:36
rt
'tab F'P4f1T C•47£ Vi'1ii4°
n, �,'
GENERAL CI4FCKI0G
30?21 OP/15/90 CEHTI)PY L.AaS
�.� 30222 09/15/90 COAST TO COAST
w 30222 03/15/90 COAs TL COAST
30222 08/15/90 COAST TO COAST
30222 08/15/90 COAST TO COAST
30222 09/15/90 COAST TO C.QAST
oi- 30722 08/15/90 COAST TO COAST
p 30222 03/15/90 COAST TO COAST
30227 08/15/90 rnAl,T In rrMAcT
30222 08/15/90 COAST TO COAST
I`s 30722 08/15/90 COAST TO COAST
ca
30222 09/15/90 COACT Trt �i'tAST
30222 08/15/90 COAST TO COAST
se 30222 09/15/00 COAST TO COAST
a 30221 Qq/ I j/Qf• Cn,f e.T TM rfIA ^-•T
30222 09/15/90 COAST TO COAST
30222 08/t5/90 COAST TO COAST
n 30222 08/14./nn rf?e_CT TO COegT
?0??2 09/'5/90 6t1A',T T/r COAST
30222 ne/.5/ISO ,_oA$T r0 COAST
7^ O^/,%/onr1'If. `T III rr7AvI
("I 30222 0l/t5/00 COAST TO COAST
' 3J223 08/1500 PETS
:1
r,•� 30??4 DA/ Iri/9n Crt:Y nIfOLCATIIIG PPM
;rl 30225 09/15/90 OA14LGPEN SHAROLO4 AN
30?20 06/ 19/90 0 & JEPPYS GP.EENHO
u
s:
r 302?7 09/ 1 qa nOER$_'WATER CARF It
e1 30278 00/15/90 OYNA SYSTEMS
01 ~ 702?0 06/15/00 ENNIS CAFIINETS/JIM
CI
»a39
30230 08/t5/?0 FIRST TRUST CENTER
�rl
• qp��1 p�i'r4/00 °OSIER-FFANLEN-CARL%
7 an?�••_y<I 1r. �� Ili^��,c��Y ATF MIF CAI
30233 0�/t5/90 HARZl+'e AUTO SUPPLY
-.��a, �Ia/ir.•�n .... 2i1T(1 SUS%Lf
OESCP.I;,TIOfI A:°?;1flT CLAIM SP+
?76 L•FFft I'll I FP/:APK TFPT 155-71
35 SUPPLTF,S/Al.l. CITY OFF 163.21.
35 CIIPPI TFc/AI I � TTV nFPT i1 r:..
35 SUPPLIES/ALL CITY OEPTS 4.19
35 SUPPLIES/ALL CITY DEPT 69.31.
3q gllopl TFC/A1I rTTv ncD an an
35 SUPPLIES/ALL CITY CIE, -IT 17.00
35 SUPPLIES/All CITY D4PI 20.92•
Ar, c1109-1 TFC/A11 rTTv nc PT 1a nn
35 SUPPLIES/ALL CITE DEPT 63.72
35 SUPPLIES/ALL CITY OFPT 17.99
-R %110121 TFa/AI I CT -Y nF PT t-) at
35 SUPPLIES/ALL CITY DEFT 27.7^:
35 SUPPLIES/AL1. •.I'ry Dc^T 15.95
%q "IIPPI Too/AI' TTY AFP 119 71
3S SUPPLIES/AL1. CITY DEPT 22.33
35 SUPPLIES/ALL CITY OE%TS 0.55
1q_%IIp.pt TFC/AII rTT/ ncoT 1¢.IA
35 SUPPLIES/ALL CITY Oec,T'> L.75
35 SUPPLIES/ALL CSTY 0 --PT Ih-e$
7S 4110121 TFa/A, I rTTV r11:6T
35 SUPPLIES/ALL Cl -*Y OS91T 23.36
9,0.51
30 AOUARIUM MrC/L.I8P%Pv 171151. ICI
41 rQDY NhrHIf1E
AS PROF -SERVICES 92.59
351 REPLACE PLANT/LISPARY 10.30
AR NATFR CARE/RFIIT.tI 12rt11C ^T,�aa
50 MTC SUPPLIES/SHOD 151.63
SG CABINET/LIOPAP'f 831.00
..,
-CHECK 70.
qR C7PC HAI l CFF1: 2.05.3° _
59 1979 G.O. BOND FEES 57.SO
702.96 •C71EC4 TO"
51 ArITIOUIE CAP 'Iv5/cIR? H 99~75 _
Ra *PAF %Ei'Y-T rES/LIATF F• f. 97r, nr, ,
79 MISC OUP/All CITE OFOrS 5.1 -OCR
JJLM71lr 4r1P/♦ 1 rT (_Q�pT 75.eA._y
79 '.17gr. 3U,/41.1. Ct'/ 03f -T 15.7'+
i RRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
` 08/15/90 13:56:36
t NARRAIJT GATE VENCIOR
r
GENERAL CHECKING
M� 30233 08/15/90 HARRY'S AUTO St1PPLY
30233 08/15190 HARR'I'S AUTO SUPPLY
f 30233 01/15/90 11A:iPV'$ AUTO SUPPLY
•11 30?33 O8/1S/90 14APRYr S x?1TO SLIP -It
30233 08/15/90 HAP.RN'S AUTO SUPPLY
30233 09/15/90 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
c 30233 01/15/90 H.kPV'S AUTO SUPOLY
36234 f,,gl t5t^6 a '+1-t•g TF t•Sr..ti �'t1:
is 30235 08J15/90 HER."WiiQPY
r>
rr 30?36 OQ!}St94 a,�t l'iS F, rsa Ay.cN
u 34?36 08/15/n0 HOLM-$ & :'RAVEN
30736 OE/15/90 ti,?.•.Mi F, ,RAVEN
$U2J6 IJU1151VU HOLMES 0 GRAVEN
LrI
LIi
Y!
3i $0237 08/15190 ,,1 M OIL COMPANY
cr
30237 08/15/90 J M OTL CCIMPANY
_r
C
30238 00/15/90 JOHNSON/STEVE
cr
30239 03115/70 LIEFERT tRUCKIIJG
it
ut
30?44 4e/i5/9n LTNI• OIL 1:04VANV
If
30241 00/1i)/00 MACQUEEN EOUIOMENT
30?4? 08/15/40 MAFTIE'S FADr! SEDVI
tt 30?4? '•1A2TTE'$ F.40M SEPVI
n1flilr0i) M6^T1°'4 r^AF:M 5r%•VI
e�
rt
ns
.i 30243 O8t1fit96 »ai1,; tome
ii"�an?4J 09%19/00 -mv, cc .:.Ds
e1 30263 4$/1St9G M!js cCiOpg
i
u 3n?4a D9/15./nn •.11''-, ^n^pc
La
:0263 03115160 �A1$^, ct'•:JS
os
n _ _
30741 q;i'WFr,0n(lU'dALL CC-N>A1JY
t 30144 00/13190 M+'OCNAL4 COMPANY
0
a 30244 01/15140 Mi OO'dl•L4 COMPANY
r.
Ofsbur:lemA,lt .iournnl
O£SCP.IPTION AkOUNT CL Al )Irt
76
MI$; $UP/ALL CITY OEPT9 2.17
76
MISC SUP/AL1. CITY DEP 133,14
78
MISC SUP/ALL CITY OEC•T 13.39
19
-11 $,C CLI,'/ALt I:I TY n;PT 441.04
78
MISC SUP/ALL CITY OEPTS 2.95
78
MISC SUP/ALL CITY DEPT 14.57
78
FIRE 0907 VF11TC1 F 4110 P,,SS
_
?00.43
t'tECK T1'+'c
'+4
i`A Tt: t;Cb Cf•'Tf 'tF nCC•T � Lt
91 -LIBRARY
CLEANIUG SER 227.50
86
PRgF SEP/Cc.MEtE F -PO 1.(.I,l,gr
06
PROF SEP./TAP^ER PRO 1^091,90
85
1990 8 G.O. F:+?'JO IS ?.415.410
88
1990 A G.O. BONO IS 2.029.40
0.16).80
•CMEtK TOT
95
OIL/STREET DEPT 140.95
95
GAS/STREET DEPT 1.195.80
1,370.75
rr:'4FrK re.
90072
CREDITIWATEP VALVE INS 50.00
350
FREIGNi C;H3/FTTaE DEPT ^a0.00
352
GA4/STPF'FT DFI•T A41l, n9
104
-PARTS/STREET DEPT 20.92
107
SPRAYER/PAOD DEPT 07.90
107
PARTS/PARK OEOT 32,13
1n7
PR1111TNt' C"OAV/PAO'- nonT 'b QA
- 102.93
-C.HECK TO7
-.
in&
RETIiPNS E(rR TRAM San ! 1e4'!
108
SUPPLIES/CITV MV.1• 49.10
108
CLEAWN,j g1JPltNIMe,L rn 33,71
'nA
4+F1Vq/J. 'inti. rMP4010 "IA
148
SUPPLIECISHOP &11.17
119.20
tCH1CK TO,
111
COMPPE55EP PIP/LIE'PAP 7r9.49
117
PITC ON AIR C,:uO/FIRE 152.$0
III
AIR Cn!1D ^9D/rTT1 HAL ?A 7.6n
679.89
-'--HECK TO,
BRC FIVANCIAL SVlTEK
t4 08/15/90 13:Sr:-B
n
IJ
119P.LN7 PATE VE 000c, Dc'SCP I;'TIG'J L,M•j'!K1 ••_p,Iy; •
GENERAL !:.HrCI:!'JS
1�I1!^ 30?65 O�.f 1S/90 Miles}: Ifl]IIS'RT AI SIJ 1- MtC nF Fr711T P/!TOF:T n -46, 11
;0?4r, 09/1S/90 M31r:J. ;.Z%L EST,tTF• JO 335 MAGAZINE SUR/PLAN rz i^ 49.00
'J;
30247
08/15/90
MONTICELLO OFFICE
PR
136
OFF SUP/WATER DEPT
21.00
tj
30247
08/15/90
MONTICEL1.0 OFFICE
PR
136
OFF SUP/EILO INSP
4.89
,
0
30247
08/15/80
M?NT Ir"ELLD OFF1rF
PR
116
CLPD t S/ToRrN Rim
a at,
30247
08/15/90
MONTICELLO OFFICF
PR
136
OFFICE SiJP/CITY H.11.1.
277..39
c
308.27 'CMECV
TQT
30246
08/[5/90
MONTICELLO PRINTING
137
PRINTED FORMS/FIRE CEP
30.90
osl
30248
08/15/90
MONTICELLO PRINTING
137
ACCOUNT FORMS/FINANCE
68.80
.q
1^.7n ■r HFr1(
Tr.T-
er
30749
08/15/90
M-.?+TtCEW) ROTARY
138
MEMBERSHIP DUES/OL LIE
102.50
arl
30250
08/15/90
IAONrICELLO TIMES
140
SEAL COATING, AOVEPTISI
30.30
tr
30?50
08/15/90
MONTICELLO TIMES
140
TRAM 250 INSEPT
607.65
1°
30250 09/15/90 MQ:+7jrFllO TIMFS
140
1 FGAL ONR1 7rk1L!JC
491.49
_
30250
08/15/en
MOyTICELLO TIMES
140
OLD PEPMIT INFO
60.00
cr
30?50
09/15/90140
TIMES
140
RECYCLIf+G IIJ;O
51.86
rt
?.Q2_,,Q
n?/IV-alL
:1SS.:S.0 T'r.Fe,
-n
zInc:!AI It ZS_ -L 1_rT Trlen
ter,; n
_..,
?0?50
09/15/90
MONTICELLO TIMES
140
YEA3LY FINANCE PEPORT
4311+.7?
1.804.05 •1;HEC%
TOT
n
30251
09/15/130
'l01JT[6FLL0 VACUU14
CE
141
VACUUM RilrSll.IOPaP/
9. t0
°.,
30?S1
00/15/9C'
Mr't'1::LLO VACUUM
CE
141
POLLEP SPVSHF_9/LI'3PAL'v
1?.56
In AA
i.
ve
30252
0!/15/90
MI)O-J MOTOR SALES.
IN
142
VEHICLE PARTS/PAPE: OEP 6?.76
4f
rt
30259
OC/15/00
NATIONAL ESUSHING
PAR
144
REPAIRS/HATER DEPT
37.03
i�
30253
D?/15/90
NATIONAL BUSHING
PAR
144
MISC SUPPLIES/WATEP Der 1.10
i•�..+!Qn?�
0�/i3 L..Lr �L.�J/Li
11_•jJ�l g11QHINr
PAR
144
Fn�ITDMFr1T P.iET :/DAD�1:�4i•1,1„
„tet
°7
n
p1•6. *CHECK
T•d"
of
!1___30i3f•_O6/t6/�0
NF1,'Sr�J_Qjl�,OMPANy
/4e
•
_ATI/RTQF neo?
9ri�R
01
n
30755
0--/15/90
NOPTHFRN OXYGEN SERV
147
SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT
13.50
•i -30iSE
O9/t7/90
O'NFTLL/JEFF
161
lUPPLIE!/TOPCH RUr+
5.14
I'
r
302.+6
06/19/90
O'NEItL/JEFF
161
SOPPL.IEWRAM 250
5R.3S
l
r
30756
1�/8�_.n-1r+`
(',).L,+I kFF
tAI
>tTl P96F /TQAM 410 -
36-'74
u 3029;
_Q6/.
0^.!15/90
O'NEILL/JEFF
101
MILEAGE E>••DENSE
:.50
0-WILL/JEFF
161
MILEAGE E(PF•ngE/BP,C.:Hn
17.5n
0
9 30257 09/15/00 OM1NN GROTMER9. INC. 334 GRAVEL. ETC/$TRE6T DE 31�.4A
I F•FGFINANCIAL SYSTEM
tIl— 08/15/90 13:56:36
1 HAPPANT OATF VE NOOR
,IGENERAL CHECKING
30258 08/15/9 O PITNEY BOWES
30?59 09/15/9 0 PLUM5EPY-PURCELL'S P
30200 OE/15/90 P-gUSSE'S CLEANING S
' 30260 08/15/90 0RF9';SE'S CLEANING S
30251 00/1S/!70 R'EL7AE:Lc COPPOPATION
30701 04/i5/4 n c,;rt TagLF CO"P0OATIO"
3026? G?/ 113/9 0 POVe.- TIRE OF M04TIC
31)252 09/15!90 p4Y1! TIRE ^r 1,•.rJT[C
30?S? 09/15/"O PnVF•L TIP,E OC MC,NTIC
30263 09/15/9 0 SCHESEP SANITATION
3020x, 00/15/90 SBuTRY IY$TC_MS
30265 08/15/90 SMYTH F. HAVES
30265 08/15/90 SMTT14 A HAYES
30265 08/15/90 £MTTH F-, HAYES
r 30265 08/15/90 SMITH A HAYES
30766 09/15/SO SMI TM f1 HAVES
30265 09/15/90 SMI rH & HAYES
30466
08/15/90
SNYOER DRUG
r
�1 30267
r
00/15/TO
SPGCO-FLEXIBLE
,
0^32
OO/15/f40
,T. CLOUD TIMFS
J
' 30709
03/15/90
ST.CL000 FIRE EOUIPM
30730
0!/I5/00
¢T.C,C11).^ FIRE, EQUIPM
OQ1191'30�55''.Cl!VP
F)Ps EOUIPr
?0700
I
00/15100.T.CLMUC'
PI?E EOUIPM
1
'40270
09/15/170
STAP TP11MUE
."' S0pj1
�iiiihi^0
r,;:�ngVtST PAPEP COMP
• 30ZI1
0DJ15/J0
rU?:J;!1TST PAPER COMP
50272 09/1$/00 UNITGG RRNTAL SERVIC
3027.7_09./15/90 UNIT_QG_PEN_iAI SERC-
-' _0J ?7Z 00%•19/'76, LIN(p/;r: rt:viAl. SERVK
Oil hur¢ ,nnn+ .lnurn,al
DESCRIPTION t.M:•UNT CLAIt
168 POSTAGE MACHTME RENTAL 6?.75
?51 9L0 REPAIP. 0Are7c/PARKS '3.75
173 CLEANING/FTPF HALL 50.00
173 CLEANING/CITY HALL 400.00
45n.on
179 OFFICE 70.01.
-7a P;CVr- T!:r 1;1.:-,;.1 Ta•e J,6. 11
2.).?5
737 VFHJCI,E PcaA'o5/:'A:•Y4; 7r, -4F1
727 VEHICLE CEP'IS4191C'?T 16.00
227 EOL1IPSIENT FE'>ATP- ;'APT ?L-.(. 5L.
37^•07
186 LATRINE RENTAL/PAPKS 67.00
188 MTC AGREEMErJT/;IRF, MA 1 ?Ek ,00
114 IQr;AI Ftac; alto 14
194 LEGALFEES/SANDBERG EAS 32.00
19A LEGAL FEE'S/K MART IE.25
194 LEGAL FEES/TAPPER PRO 3N; An
194 LEGAL FEES/OAA 16.00
194 LEGAL FEES/REM•MLE PRO 130.50
1.non. ln
773 SUPPLIES/TPAM 250 21.45
90071 SEMINAR FEE/P CLItJF 30.00
9nn AD FOR 8IGS14164uY1.u, r,, 1R
2L? FIRE EXTIrJOUISHFP MTS
247 FIRE ErTINOUT91+f; MTC T-tn
7L7 FIRE EVTItJ0UT40lEF' MTC 17,x20
1+: ;IRE EYTIu•2:ISHEv MTC ?9.00
^7.5n
197 AO FOR OIOS/5I0f111AL4 400.00
200 TOWELS. E7C/,r7v HALL 77.37
?OB TOWELS. ETC/PA;KS DEP 10'.60
11n.Q7
211 UNIFORMS 0.00
211 IiNtmmq 11"4,00
711 UNIFORMS 4'.00
VrHFr't
-CHECK TC -IAL
.CHFrF T ---A
EtRC FINANCIALSVSTEM
5/90 13;56:36
n�a�nr a.anant lnur n.l
4NT OAT .-E r:Ehh?
Oc SCF: I PT 3 t?.'1
AM 0'!f:T
CLAIM j.K': •'
GENEP.AL CHECKING
11 3027? 09/15/90 -!N1TQG R. HJAL tE°V1:
211 LINIFOOMS
la.nn
II
30272 08/15/90 U:1:(TOV gErl?AL SEPVrC
211UNIFORM;
7.20
30 ?7? 0?/15/90 UNTTOG REfITAL SeF'VIC
211 UNIFOcrdS
12.00
30?72 09/15/90 !17Ir-h, ,,FNrAl. SSOvJC
211 UNIFORMS
1?.nn
137.29
•CHECK TOTAL
30273 0P/15/90 UN^CAS
41*4 nrA4/F TRF MpPT
-6 co
30273 0',/15/90 UN^CAL
?13 GAS/SEWER CO v_ DEPT
3.7,
30273 08/15/90 UNOCAL
213 GAS/WATER DEPT
3.75
�t n�
0W r T..Y hl
30274 O8/15/90 WIL.SOrJ/RECHARO
.90073 RECYCLING PPIZE
50.00
° 30775 03/15/90 WP IGHT COUNTV AUOIIO
219 AUG SHERIFF'S CONT
12.506.71
r
30276 08/15/90 Y. *1,C.A. OF MINNEAPn
77fyp11 .1197 YMrA fc.NTan.-r
r,lz; nn
GENERAL CHECKING
,.TOTAL
36.777.77
t.
1
X.PC FINANCIAL SV5TEM.
09/73/90
11:35:39
Qi 9[Vrcnm?n;
J0Vrne).
HAPRANT
DATE
VENO^1:
OE SC P.I PT TON
AMOUNT CLA, iM
-)NV^
GENERAL CHECKING
30277
08/22/90
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
211
EARNEST_MnNEV/PUR.AGR 100.00-- - _•
30219
08/22/90
MN DEPART OF NATURAL
118
'WATERCRAFT/SNOW/ATV
R 107.00
30279
08/22/90
LEERSSEN/JANETTE
?84
INFO CENTER SALARY
120.00
30279
08/22/90
LEERSSEN/JANETTE
284
INFO CENTER SALARY
37.SOCR
82.50 *CHECK
TOTAL
30280
08/22/90
HAVES/WILMA
?SS
INFO CENTER SALARY
162.01
30280._08/.22/90.HAYES/W.LLMA.__--..-._-..285_TNFO
X.ULTFILSALAR_`L_____.50.63CR-_.--
..._
111.38 'CHECK
TOTAL
30281
06/27/90
MONTICELLO FIRE OEPA
135,..FIPEMEN!S
WAGES _-
1.428.00
30781
08/22/90
MONTICELI.O FIRE DEPA
135
FIREMEN'S WAGES
S.79CR
1.421.22 'CHECV
TOTAL.
-30282
08/27/00
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF
174
INSURANCE PREMIUM
964.51.-
30282
08/27/90
PRINCIPAL.MIJTUAL LIF
174
INSURANCE PPEMIUM
1.747.37
30282
08/22/90
PRINCIPAI. MUTUAL LIF
174
INSURANCE PPEMIUM
618.07
3028?
08/??/90
PC' T.'JOTPAi_ MUTUAL LIF
174
INSURANCE PPEMIU"
150.03
30282
08/?2/00
PRINCIPAL MUTUAI. LT;
174
INSLIPANr,E PPEMIUM
158.03
_.30282.00/22/90-PPINCIPAL
MUT,UAL-_LIF-.___17L_LNSU"UCE-PPEMIUM......-....35..1.1_..-__
30282
08/22/00
PRINCTPAI• MUTUAL LIF
174
INSURANCE PREMIUM
156.03
30282
08/27/90
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF
174
INSURANCE PREMIUM
689.8?
30282
08/22/00
PAT14CTPAL MUTUAI. LIF.
174
.INSURANCE PREMTLIM
01.10
y�
30282
08/72/90
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF
174
INSURANCE PREMIUM
197.74
30282
09/22/90
PP.INCIPAI, MUTUAL LIF
174
INSURANCE PREMIUM
460.23
--. .30282.08/22/.90•
PRINCIPAL- MUTUAL -LIF.-..1)4_iN$URANCI^PREMIUM--1..U1sJ..A1__..__
30282
08/22/90
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF
174
INSURANCE PREMIUM
806.70
30282
08/22/90
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF
174
INSURANCE PREM71JM
314.43
30282
08/22/90
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF
174
INSURANCE PREMIUM...
376.47
30782
08/27/90
PRINCIPAL MUIUAL LIF
174
INSUPANCE PREMIUM
404.35
30282
08/22/00
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF
174
INSURANCE PREMIUM
$7.09
30282._00/22490_PRINCIPALMUJUAL-LIF_.17.4-LNSUAAeICE-.PPEM1UM_.
30282
09/22/90
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF
174
INSURANCE PREMIUM
34.35
7.880.01 ICH ECB
TOTAL
30283
09/22/90
REDSTONE CONSTRUCTIO
208
STREET VTIL IMPIME
30.044.38
30284_-08/22/.90._LARSON
EACAVA-LNG.._1 -_3.51
07reg FT I1 TIL -IMP/.1-1.27.-.8..99--
- -
30285
08/22/90
MEVER/HARRY
.90076
RECYCLING PRIZE
75.00
302OG
08/77/90
MN DEPART OF NATURAL
118
WATERCRAFT/SNOW ATV
PE 81.00
_ 3028.7_.08/23/00.aNDEa40N/.Gaay._.._.
�t_IRA/gL_gYP.Er,56--- X53.4.7---
30288
00/73/90
BARTON SAND 8 OP.AVEL
377
OPUMOINO CO'JCRETE CMGs
45.00
30288
08/23/00
BARTON SAND A GRAVEL
322
SAND/PARKS DEPT._
92.76
137.70 'CM ECK
TOTAL
FINANCIAL SYSTEM
.BFC
08/23/90
11:35:39
------- Oiebureement
Journal -
.!RANT
DATE
VENDOR
DESCRiPTION
AMvUNT
CLAIM INVC)
GENERAL CHECKING
30289
08/23/90
BROWN7NG-FERDIS IVDU
.90075
LATE RTNE-RENTAL/•TPAM -
170.00 -
•--- --
30290
08/23/90
CONTINENTAL SAFETY E
256
VEHICLE PARTS/FIRE DE
190.00
30?91
08/23/90
FAIR'S GARDEN CENTER
55
REPLACE SHRUBS/FIRE H
117.65
30292
08/23/90
J M 071. COMPANY
95
LUBRICANTS/FTRE•DEPT-•
?2.05-•---.
-
30?93
0';/7?/90
VFP•1'nAVE
357
LETTERS/CITY HAL! SIG
3?4.64
—
30?94
09/23/90
KOROPCHAK/OLIVE -
- 97
TRAVEL EXPENS
15.75
30?95
09/73/90
✓PAEMEP/WANDA
-359-MILEAGE-EIPENSE
11.00•
30295
08/23/90
KRAEMEP/'JANDA
358
MILEAGE EXPENSE.
17.00
23.00
-CHECF: Tf..+TA:.
30296
08/23/90
MACOUEEN EQUIPMENT I
104
HOSE/STREET DEPT
175.84
30797
08/23/90
MAIDS/KENNETH -
109
MILEAGE-EYPENSE
21.11
30298
08/23/90
MIO CENTRAL. INC.
113
CLOTHING SUPPLIES/FIRE
27.50
08/23/90
MIDWAY INDUSTRIAL SU
114
FILTERS/STREET DEPT
139.06
(.10?99
;6300
08/23/90
MIDWEST VISION DISTR.
- 279
SAFGT.Y.-GLASSES
19.00
)0300
09/23/90
MIDWEST VISION DISTR
779
SAFETY GLASSES
48.00
30300
08/23/90
MIDWEST VISION DISTR
279
SAFF,TY GLASSES
1.6.00
30300-08/23/90
mIDWEST-VISION..OIS•TR----279-SAFE•T-Y-GLASSES---•-- •--16.50•----•-
---
30300
08/23/00
MIDWEST VISION DISTR
279
SAFETY GLASSES
15.90
147.00
-CHECK TOTAL
I 30301
08/23/90
MINN DFPUT'/ REGISTRA
121
MAPS FOR RESALE
37.00
� • 3030?
-08/23/90••M0811••
.__ _
V -
- +•31 -GAS /•6 LR6•&T•-DEPT__-_._..
141,09 ...
...._
3030?
08/?3/90
MOB TL
131
TIRE REPAIR/STREET DED 23.02
30307
08/73/90
m08IL
131
TIRE P.EPAIR/SEWEP. DEPT 20.41
?0302
08/23/90
000e.11•
131
GAS/.SEWED DEPT
F0. 70
• 3030?
08/23i 90
M^BTL
131
GAS/WATeP DEPT
89.09
305.01
•CHECK TOTAL
30303
08/23/90
MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO
185
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVIC
023.15
30304
1
08/23/90
MTI DIS8T0701.1TTNG CO
790
VEHICLE, REPAIR DARTS/
397.18
30305
00/23/90
O.E.I. BUSINESS FORM
158
COPY MACHINE PAPER
74.00
30306
08/23/90
O'CONNOR/MICHAEL W..
263
PROF SER/UNION NEGOT
875.00
$RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
08/23/90
.11:35:39
-.. -. _._ Disbursement Journal_
WARRANT
DATE VENDOR
OESCPIPTION AMOUNT
CL All )1.111
- -----
GENERAL CHECKING _-_...--•-----
•--
----•—•---- •------
-------
30307
0903/90 PALMER PRINTING COMP
348.-NEW.CIT_V
6P.00HURES 0.683.00
30308
08/23/90 PHILLIPS 66 CDM --ANY
167
GAS/STREET DEPT 13.34
30309
08/23/80 SHIJMAN/CATHY
191
TRAVEL EXPENSE 43.50
30310
08/23/90 WATER PRODUCTS COMPA
216
SUPPLIES/WATER DEPT 709.30
30310
08/23/90 WATER PRODUCTS COMPA
216
SUPPLIES/WATER DEPT 190.09
30310
09/23/90 WATER PRODUCTS COMPA
216
SUPPLIES/MATER DEPT 54.70
..30310_08/.2.3./80
-WATER _.PROOUCT.S-COMPA--21-SLLR.R, 19S(WAxE.R-OEP-T---_5.7.2..96- ----
— -----
1.527.04
•CHECK TOTAi
i
GENERAL. CHECKING
__ --TOTAL.— 179.303.30
i
i
I
i
-
J
ERC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
- •.
X0/01/90
13:46:53
Oi:.Dur8ement
Journal'
�1�r1
{ IR/AFRAN7
-DA.I'L•__ VENDOR
lL1;?iUOfi'FU7JD
15235
07/31/90
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF
800038
INSURANCE PPEMIUM
719.75
15235
07/31/90
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF
800038
INSURANCE PREMIUM
108.60
*CILECK_TOIA
r'
15236
07/31/90
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
800012
MIR
9.09
1523G
07/31/90
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
800012
WINE PURCHASE-
434.66
-•CHFIK
'
41,31. 15
r.111
.1
{ 15237-_OL/31190
GRIGGS..000FER-& CO4Lfl000_tp
1101106, 211aGHASE_.8..969..7-7
15238
07/31/90
SPATE CAPETOL CREOIT
800044
PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS
250.00
15739
07/31/90
WRIGHT COUTIIV $TAIL
800052
FICA EMPLOYEkS W/H
175.43
15239
07/31/90
WP.ECi11T COUNTY STATE
800052
FICA EMPLOYEES W/H
175.43
15239
07/31/90-WRIGHT
COUNTY. S?ATE__80.Q¢52.FEVfRAL.W/1J--_ _—_.22L.7.2_
15239
07/31/90
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
000052
EMPLOYEES MEDICARE
W/H II.37
15230
07/31/90
WRIGHT COUNTY STATE
800052
EMPLOYERS FICA W/H
11.37
_.
.645.32 *CHECK
TOft
15240
07/31/90
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA
800022
LIQUOR PURCHASE
173.50
15240
07/31/90
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA.
800022-WINE.-PURCHASE
-
2.634.48
2.757.98 *CHECK
101/,
15241
07/31/90
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET
800039
PERA W/H
204.46
15242
07/31/90
COMMISSIONER OF RIVE
800005
STATE PAYROLL DFOUCII 734.78
-I 15243
07/31/90
GRIGGS. COOPER & COM
800018
LIQUOR PURCHASE-
2.656.40
•- ! 15244
07/31/90
EAGIF. WINE COMPANY
800012
WINE PURCHASE
71.51
15245
07/31/9n
PHEI_LIFS 6 SUNT CO/E
8001137
BEER PURCHASE
13.0
"rl 15745
07/31/90
PHIL 1, 1: PS & $ONS COI E_000Q37—WIME
PURCHASE .-.._
125.03
{'" 15245
07/31/90
PHILLIPS 6 SONS CO/E
900037
LIQUOR PURCHASE
2.077.56
;'I
2.215.61 •1 HFCY.
10.
"1 15246
01/31/90
IDHNSON BROS WHOI.ESA
800022
I.f000R PURrHASc
1,787.90
15246
07/31/90
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA
900072
WINE PUPCIIAgE
1.811.37
3.664.67 .. OLHECK
IQI
u
1%747
07/31/90
GRIGGS. COOPER IS COM
SOWS
LIQUOR PURCHASE
3.006.44
LL04nR FHND
TOTAL
15.950.14
BRC FIt1ANCIAL SYSTEM
00/01/90
15:42:00
-
-.-.
_-_..__-- Giisbursemmnt Journal.
.. _
WAk RANT
DATE
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AML•IJIJI
CLA 111
15248
08/10/90
BE RNICK 'S PEPSI COLA
800001
-POP_P.URCHASE
264.40 .
15249
08/10/90
r3RIl)GEWATFR rr•1.FP1100
800002
rELEPHI'NE CHARGES
74.34
15250
08/10/90
BUSINESS RECORDS COR
800064
PAYROLL CHECKS 8
FORM 711.61
J J
15251
08/10/90
COMM ['SOF REVE
800006
2NO,HALF JUNE SALES
5.043 h4
15752
08/10/90
Cl Plfl)lF)MFR 0T$TR1&UT
800009
BEEF: PURCHASE
74.71?.49
' 1.5252_08/10/90.OA11LHEIMER
0.[S[RIBJL8000.09�•Si%�1�RCHASE
__.IUA._L5.___
_
'
24.813.74
•CHECK TOI
15253
O8/10/90
O.A7 D(SrrIBUTINt; COM
800010
LEMON LIMSS
1, .75
15753
OP/10/90
DAY O)SIRIBUIING COM
800010
PEER PURCHASE
453.00
457 .75
•CHECK 1'•)1
15254
DO/ 10/90
DICK BEVERAGE COMDAN
600011
MISC SUPPLIES
45.50
15254
00/10/80
DICK BEVERAGE COMPAN
800011
BEER PURCHASE
1.845.45
1.890.95
*CHECK 1,•1
15255
08/10/90
EAGLE WINF COMPANY
000012
WINE PURCHASF-
256.41
15258
06/10/90
GRIGG:. COOPER @ COM
000010
LIQUOR PURCHASE
3.795.60
it
15257
00/10/90
GR043MIN I3EVERAGF. i
000019
MIX PUPCHA5E
13.55
>✓
1 757
09/10/90
GRO�SLI-Itl BEVERAGE 1
800010
MISC SUPPLIES
3? .00
15257
08/10/90
GROSSI.FIN BEVERAGE 1800019
COOLERS FOR RF.'SALE
43.45
_ 15257
06/.10%90.
GAOSSLLIN _Fj LV RAGE_ 1 8.0 0-0 19
FIFER PII `RLHASE ---22
22-2,Jw
-_
23.012.45
'CHECK TO!
15250
09/10/90
JOHNSON•BROS WHOLESA
000022..
LIQUOR .PURCHASE.
_. 2.631.15
152•i9
08/10/90
JOHNSON 13:ZOS WHOLESA
000022
WINE PURCHASE
101.00
1
7.792.15
*CHECK 19-1
I� 15259
1
0@/10/90
JUI1F, CANDY 81 T06ACC0.80007I
CIO$, CIGARS
358.21
15759
US/10/90
JIJOE" CANDY A T06ACC0
8000?1
MISC OPERATING SUPPl1E 64.80
15159
()8/10/90
wntr f+NOY @ TgDACCO
800021
LIQUOR GAGS
356.93
_
571 .94
ICIIGCP 1..",
1 3 15.0q-'0j/
10/99
KOLI.f., 3rANds/i7J4�_,@99923�ilifiD�fi�SVlirliA
291M._2D1 .40
_ _- -
' I 15781
00/10/90
KRWr- RADIO STATION
800024
ADVERTISING
96.00
„� i528^
UH/111/•)n
Lh.FI:?f rRIIcKING
3(30025
FRF,IGHT CIIAF,F,Y
548.14
15201
OC/ 10/99
MALIS F OQD r _ . __
JUQj SUPF•LIEL_.
�, 15264
08/10/90
MCOVWALL COMPANY
000085
REPAIR COOLER
17e.10
1:RC FIIIANCTAL `_:VSTEM
00/07/90 15:42:03
Oisbursemnt .1wornal _
�- ARRANT
DATE
VENDOR
DESCRTPTION
AmrjUNT CLAIM Ill%
. �
LIQUOR FUND
' 15265
03/10/90
MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
300028
UT.IL.IT.IES — _
__ __3.90
- 15266
'
03/10/90
MONTECELI.O I[M:ES
800032
ADVERTISING
55.00
15267
08/10/90
NORTHERN STATES POWE
600035
UTILITES A
1.101.54
15?60
00/10/90
O'HARA BROS. COMPAHI
800058.MUG HOLDERS/COOLERS.E.237.32.
15269
08/10/90
PER'SIAN'S C-USINESS E
800067
CALCULATOR
163.31
•,'; 15270
08/10/90
PHILLIPS & SONS CO/E
800037
LIQUOR PURCHASE
446.10
15271
08/10/90
QUALITY WINE $ SPIRI
800060-LIOUOk
PURCHASE
203.65
15211
03/10/90
AUAI.IIY WINE 8. ;;'IRE
800040
WINE PIJRCItASE
1.960.19
'
2.171.84 •CHECK 1011
15272
08/10/90
RON'S ICE COMPANY
800041
ICE —
906.23
15273
08/10/90
SERVICE SALES CORPOR
600042
MACHINE TAPE
31.31 .
15274
08/10/90
SEVEN -IJP 1307TI.ING CO
800043
POP PURCHASE
199.45
152.75
08/10/90
ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT
800045
MIX.CUPS.CORV.SCREWS.
173.17
15216
08/10/90
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
000048
BEER -PURCHASE
?2.903.70
15277
08/10/90
TWIN CITIES FLAG SOU
800049
FLAG REPAIR
130.94
a 15279
08/10/90
VIKING COCA-COLA BOT
800051
POP PURCHASE
— 1.167.55
1
LIOL10A FUND
_ TOTAL -_
96.852.67
"I
I
l
f,
TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH • 449 West Broadway, Box 776 • Monticello. Minnesota 55362
July 16, 1990
T0: Monticello City Council
SUBJECT: Sidewalk Repair/Replacement
The Trinity Lutheran Church Council and Todd Holt (413 W. Broadway)
wish to petition into the city grid for sidewalk repair and replacement.
The Church Council and Mr. Holt understand we will be assessed $2.50 per
running foot of sidewalk along the north side of Broadway Avenue only.
The Church Council and Mr. Holt also understand the city wants to
replace 5 panels of sidewalk in front of Trinity Lutheran Church and the
entire 100 foot portion in front of Mr. Holt's house, and the total cost
to Trinity and Mr. Holt will be approximately $350.
Thank you for your consideration.
-ACO,�9/�_0,
Trinity Lutheran Church Council
Todd Holt. Homeowner
413 Nest Broadway
Monticello, MN 35362
Bruen 0. Miller and Gary A. Sar4Wg, Peators r Phone (B 12) 2952082
N
June 25, 1990
Mr. Gary Anderson
Zoning Administrator
City of Monticello
Monticello, Minnesota 55362
Dear Mr. Anderson:
Office of
HWGHT COUNTY AT PORNEY
WILLIAM S. MaePHA1L
Wright County Courthouse - Buffalo, Minnesota 55313
Phone: 612-82-3900
339 -MBI
1-800-362.3667
With respect to the recent citations issued pursuant to the Monticello
"Junk' ordinance, please be advised as follows:
Alfano, Richard Lee: The charges were dismissed as the vehicle in
question did have current registration, although not properly
displayed thereon.
Drahota, Timothy David: On 05/02/90, defendant pled guilty to the
public nuisance charge and was fined $200, $150 of which was stayed on
the conditions that he remain lav abiding, have no same or similar
violations for a period of 1 year and remove the vehicle within 1
week.
Leslie, Georqo Marvin: A citation was mailed, and a court date is
forthcoming.
Longley, William Robert: On 05/23/90, defendant pled guilty to the
public nuisance charge and was fined $200, $150 of which was stayed on
the condition that the debris is cleaned up within 30 days.
Maas, Christopher August: On 06/20/90, defendant failed to appear in
court, ana a Complaint -Summons was issued. A court data is
forthcoming.
Romano, Diane Gail: On 05/23/90, defendant was fined $200, $150 of
which was stayed on the conditions defendant pay fine and remove
vehicle within 30 days.
Schmidt, Nancy Ratr: On 04/25/90, defendant pled guilty to the public
nuisance charge and was fined $50. Records indicate defendant has
compliod with city ordinance.
Swanson, Donald Cleland: Defendant is scheduled to appear in court on
06/27/90 at 1:30 p.m.
Walter, Ivan Russell: Complaint -Summons issued 05/23/90. A court
date is forthcoming.
FgW100por,rnuylAffirww,lw Artwn Employer
Mr. Gary Anderson
Page Two
�y June 25, 1990
The following people were not issued citations as, upon further
investigation, it was found the situation had been corrected:
Burlington Northern Railroad
Richard Gordon Cole
Custom Sheet Metal
Sharon Jenette Derheim
Mrs. Brian Erickson
Karla Louise Hammer
Daniel Ransoms Peet
Timothy Alfred Witschen
Please advise if any of these defendants have failed to comply within
the time set forth by the court. Failure to comply is a violation of
probation, and we will see that the defendant(s) is/are brought back
to court for further proceedings.
With respect to the fines imposed in these cases, I have found in the
nearly 15 years of handling these cases that the objective is to
obtain compliance with the ordinance rather than to impose punishment
through the imposition of heavy fines. By agreeing to recommend a
more reasonable fine in exchange for a guilty plea and a promise of i
compliance within a reasonable period of time, my office has been
fairly successful in obtaining compliance rather than prolonged and
l.; costly trials. I believe your efforts to clean up the city have been
very successful to date. If you have any questions, please feel free
to contact me. We will continue to advise you with respect to future
cases.
very sincerely yours,
William S. MacPhail
Wright County Attorney
WSM/knt
cc: Basil Schillewaort
c