City Council Agenda Packet 11-27-19891
a
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Monday, November 27, 1989 - 7:00 p.m.
Mayor: Ren Maus
Council Members: Fran Fair, Warren Smith, Shirley Anderson, Dan Slonigen
1. Call to order. J/
2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held November 13, 1989,
3. Citizens comments/pet it ions, requests, and (,oupiaints.
4. Consideration of accepting park dedication fee - West Prairie Partners
Subdivision plat.
5. Consideration or City participation in financing a portion of the
Evergreens Subdivision development torts via the assessment process,
6. Consideration of final payment on Project t89-1, Marvin Elwood Road
Extension in the Meadows {public project).
7. Consideration of resolutions ordering preparation of assessment roll and
setting a public hearing on adoption of assessment roll on Marvin Elwood
Road extension - Meadows Subdivision.
8. Consideration of accepting the improvements associated with the Meadows
( Second Addition (private project) .
9. Consideration of replacing electric motor for deep well turban pump in
well A1.
10. Consideration of amendments to snow plowing/reimval policy and adoption
of revised snow plowing and removal plan.
11. Consideration of bills for the month of November.
12. Adjournment.
A
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, November 13, 1989 - 7:00 p.m.
Members Present: Fran Fair, Warren Smith, Ren Maus, Shirley Anderson,
Dan Blonigen
Member; Absent: None
Approval of minutes.
After discussion, motion uade by Dan Blonigen and seconded by
Shirley Anderson to approve the meeting minutes as presented. Motion
carried unanimously.
3. Citizens coimnents. petitions, requests and complaints.
..one forthcoming.
Public hearing on the adoption of a supplemental assessment roll for the
89-03 inprovement project (Oakwood Industrial Park overlay). And
Consideration of adopting an assessment roll for certification to County
Auditor.
City Engineer John Badalich explained that the original bituminous paving
within the Oakwood Industrial Park was always planned and designed for a
7 ton capacity. According to Badalich the original feasibility study was
prepared by OSM covering sewer and water extensions within the Industrial
Park along with bituminous paving, which included curb 6 gutter, and
storm sewer improvements estimated at a total cost of $800,000. Those
costs were reviewed at a public hearing on April 25, 1977, at which time
the project was tabled and no action again was taken until May 9, 1977,
at which time the Council ordered preparation of plans and specs for
servicing Oa;.cod Industrial Park with water and sewer only, with
bituminous paving, curb 6 gutter, and storm sewer improvements being
deleted from the project. John Badrlich went on to note that the records
seem to indicate, and it was his recollection that development of the
streets in this area would occur under a phased approach and the original
bituminous overlay was designed for 7 ton capacity with the intent to
install the additional bituminous at such time that the curb and gutter
is installed.
Dale Lungwitz stated that the Oakwood Industrial Partnership originally
asked for a 9 ton road, not a 7 ton road.
Dan Blonigen replied that "You thought you were getting a 9 ton road and
you got a 7 ton road. If the City had insisted on a 9 ton road how much
would you have spent extra for the 9 ton road. By putting a 7 ton road
in at the start you ended up saving considerable money over the life of
the original road."
Jay Morrell nnted that he would not have purchased the structure in the
Industrial Park had he known that the roads were of a 7 ton design. He
went on to request that the Council consider the same 80/20 split of
expenses that was used in assessing the properties that benefited from
the atreetecape project. 0
a
Council Minutes - 11/13/89
Ken Maus noted that streetscape and industrial park roads cannot be
fairly compared in terms of establishing assessment policy.
Fran Fair stated that once the roads are installed they are there for
everyone's use. After installation the roads should be the
responsibility of the City and improvement costs associated with
established roads should be paid for via ad velorum taxes.
Dan Blonigen stated that he is not disputing that once a road is
established that the City should pay its share to maintain it, however,
this road is different. The iuprovemient completed represents an upgrade,
not maintenance.
Ken Maus noted that when George Phillips requested to downgrade the
original 1977 project there was no evidence indicating that the
Partnership wanted to have the street portion of the project reduced
from 9 ton to 7 ton. It appears then that it was very likely a City
decision to downgrade the roads from 9 ton to 7 ton and it may have never
been formally requested.
Motion was made by Fran Fair to reaffirm the previous assessment formula
which called for a 808 project cost paid for by the City and 208 by the
benefiting property owners. Motion seconded by Warren Smith. Voting in
favor: Fran Fair, Warren Smith, Ken Maus. Opposed: Shirley Anderson
and Dan Blonigen. Motion carried.
5. Continuation of public hearing for sanitary sewer extension on Oakwood
Drive.
This item was continued from the previous meeting pending input from
Stuart Hoglund, who is the major benifiting property owner of the
proposed project. A letter submitted by Mr. Hoglund indicated that he
does not support the extension of sanitary sewer as proposed.
Deferal of the assessment was discussed. However, no method of defering
the Hoglund assessment was established.
Rick Wolfsteller noted that the Comfort Inn is presently for sale and
that transaction may impact the method by which the cost of the project
would be assessed against the benefiting property owners. Since the
terms of the transaction are not understood at this time, it might make
sense to table the matter until all the potential affected property
owners are talked to. Ken Maus and Fran Fair concurred that the City
might want to postpone a decision on this matter until after the sale of
the land.
Motion made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Fran Fair to postoone a
decision on this matter to the first regulAr meeting in Docember. Motion
carried unanimously.
Motion made by Fran Fair and seconded by Dan Blonigen to allow Lee Parks
to upgrade the private sanitary sewer by installing a holding tank if it
is found that such an upgrade is absolutely necessary. Motion carried
unanimously.
0
Council Minutes - 11/13/89
Review Pinewood Cozmminity Playground Plans, receive project update.
Cheryl Fuller, representing the Pinewood Coimnunity Playground
Organization, was present to provide Council with an update on the
progress of the playground project. Fuller reviewed the preliininary
design plan and requested input from Council. Fuller also noted to
Council that Roger Mack will be serving on a co,mnittee which will be
reviewing the plans in further detail.
Ken Maus asked if restrooin facilities will be provided at the playground
site.
Cheryl Fuller responded by saying that a nearby restroom on the school
site is available for use by individuals using the play structure.
Ken Maus also suggested that the school district may wish to consider
striping of the parking area associated with the play structure. After
discussion, Ken Maus thanked Cheryl for the update and encouraged the
playground coimnittee to keep up the good work.
7. Consideration of a conditional use request to allow a tri-plex in an R-2
(single and two fainily residential) zone. Applicant: Brad 6 Cindy Pyle.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill explained that Brad and Cindy Pyle
requested a conditional use permit which would allow an existing house to
be converted into a tri-plex. The property in which the property is
located consists of 22,077 sq. ft, of area, which is more than the
minimum amount of land necessary for a tri-plex. However, the site plan
fails to utilize the full land area potential of the property in a manner
that will minitnize the negative impacts created by the tri-plex. O'Neill
went on to note that at its regular meeting on November 7th, the Planning
Crumnission conducted a public hearing and then recwmnended that Council
deny the conditional use request, based on the fact that the site plan is
to be designed in a »nner that does not properly utilize the space
available. In addition, the site plan is contrary to the City ordinance
because the development is not consistent with the character of the
neighborhood, the use will tend to depreciate the adjoining property and
there is not a demonstrated need for the tri-plex.
O'Neill went on to note that the Planning Coimnission did not close the
door to an approval of this conditional use permit contingent on
development of a new site plan which would call for two suitable, usable
parking spaces developed in the rear of the property, with such spaces
gaining street access directly onto Maple Street.
After discussion, motion made by Warren Smith and seconded by Fran Fair
to approve conditional use request to allow a tri-plex in the R-2 zone,
subject to the following conditions:
A. No ware than A developed parking spaces allowed to front Third St.,
° including the enclosed garage space.
1
B. Garage openings must face Third St.
S Council Minutes - 11/13/89
Vi
C. The driveway access to Third St, shall be no wider than 24'. All
_ yard area outside of the driveway shall be sodded so as to prevent
,t utilization of green area as parking area. A��op p gen t +ti r�) �
I r` 'it"a 6a an bite- H ��r t eM., 5lort ,wr
!' o. Curb cut and bitumnal;, inous parking surface with access to Maple Street
S must be installed by June 1, 1990, and be sufficient to accomodate
i two vehicles. Prior to June 1, 1990, a temporary gravel surface in
this area is allowable.
a'
fi 1` E. No use of third unit is allowed until the curb cut and gravel surface
�1 is installed.
Motion carried unanimously.
B. Consideration of permit which would allow development of a single mobile
home site at the licntside Mobile Home Park in Monticello.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill informed Council that Don Heikes has
submitted a request to the city of Monticello which calls for development
of a single mobile home site in addition to the 17 sites now existing at
his mobile home park. O'Neill explained that Planning Commission
conducted a public hearing regarding this matter and received testimony
from Scott Hill and the Cemnetary Association. As a result of this
testimony and input from staff, Planning Commmission recommended approval
of a permit to add a single mobile home lot contingent on the developer
fulfilling a number of conditions.
Mr. Heikes stated that he intends on complying with all of the conditions
listed.
Ken Maus noted that Mr. Hill brought up other concerns that the City
should be dealing with, such as the problem with unlicensed mobile homes
in the mobile home park. Maus also suggested that a stop sign be
installed &c the entrance of the mobile home park per the suggestion .rade
by Scott Hill.
After discussion, motion was trade to allow expansion of the west Side
Park with the addition of a single mobile home site, subject to the
following conditions:
A. The mobile home site may be located no further than 300' from an
existing fire hydrant.
B. Bituminous driveway shall be installed to provide access to the
mobile home expansion site.
C. The trailer shall be installed on a concrete slab, as approved by the
building inapector.
D. Electric, phone, and cable line shall be installed underground.
F.. Storm shelter shall be provided at the lower level of the duplex
which is maintained by the park caretaker living in the upper floor.
The shelter shall have a sign placed above the door and all new
tenants shall be informed of the emergency shelter.
4 9'
Council Minutes - 11/13/89
F. Expansion of the mobile home park in this area shall be limited to a
single mobile home site. No further requests for additional mobile
home sites shall be approved without meeting all of the park
expansion requirements.
G. Snow removal, grounds, and driveway maintenance, water and sewer
maintenance will be performed by the owner/operator and/or his agent.
H. A fence 6' in height shall be installed along the northern edge of
the property. The fence shall be 6' high, and 90% opaque. This
fence shall be installed from the cemetery side of the retaining
wall.
I. Developer shall install a retaining wall of sufficient height and
strength to prevent erosion into the `cemetery property.
Motion carried unanimously. 5(��,rgrc;e a
9. Consideration of final plat approval for Prairie West subdivision.
There being no appeals forthcoming by individuals or the City Council to
the variance request associated with Lot 5, Block 1 plat, motion was made
by Fran Fair, and seconded by Warren Smith to approve the final plat of
the Prairie West subdivision. Voting in favor: Fran Fair, Ren Maus,
Warren Smith, Shirley Anderson. Opposed: Dan Blonigen.
10. Simple subdivision request to allow a B-3 (highway business/eoimnercial
lot) to be subdivided into 2 coronercial lots.
Variance request to allow zero lot line setback requirement.
Applicant: The Lincoln Coupanies.
Assistant Adninistrator O'Neill informed Council that the Lincoln
Coirpanies, owners of the Monticello Mall are proposing a siirple
subdivision which would create a separate parcel on which the new K -Mart
addition would be placed. The separate identity created by this
subdivision would allow the developer to obtain the necessary financing
for the K -mart addition. In addition, the proposed subdivision will
create a zero lot line between the new property and the existing wall of
the inall. Therefore, a variance to the sideyard setback requirement is
necessary. This proposal to create a zero lot line setbnck should not be
a problem so long as the actual developm-nt occurs.
.%fter discussion, motion by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Dan Blonigen
to approve the simple subdivision request to allow a B-3 (highway
coimnercial) lot to be subdivided into 2 coimnercial lots, subject to the
following conditions:
A. Developer shall provide easements necessary to accomodate the 7th St.
right of way. Such easements would include both the curved or
straight alignment.
B. Recordinq of the subdivision cannot occur until such time that the
actual structure is under development.
Council Minutes - 11/13/89
C. Further subdivision of this property must be accomplished via the
platting process. Future plats created must incorporate all
The Lincoln Companies property, including the mall and the property
on which the inall addition will be located. Motion carried
unanimously.
11. Consideration of renewing the 1990 fire contract with the Silver Creek
Township.
Shirley Anderson noted that the dates noted in Article 8 need to be
amended to reflect the contract tern.
After discussion, motion made by Dan Blonigen and seconded by
Shirley Anderson to approve the fire protection agreement as eutlinedand
amended. Motion carried unanimously.
12. Consideration of approving on sale liquor license transfer for Comfort
Inn.
After discussion, motion made by Warren Smith and seconded by Fran Fair
to approve the liquor license application as submitted.
13. Consideration of renewing contract oQeration of city Wastewater Treatment
Plant with Protessional Services Group.
John Simmmola noted that it has been slightly over 3 years since
Professional Services Group entered into partnership with the city of
Monticello for contract operations of our Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Simnola went on to note the reasons why the privatization of the
Wastewater Treatment Plant uccurred. 71wse reasons are as follows:
1. Cost being incurred to (run the plant) at efficiencies much greater
than that required by the discharge standards.
2. Lack of long term maintenance of plant equipment and facilities.
3. Staffing deficiences due to employee absences and request from
treatment plant management for additional personnel.
4. Lack of adequate training of present staff.
5. Lack of proper sludge mnanagement techniques.
6. Imrproper operation of various plant equipment items which required an
increase in gas and electrical consumption.
7. Iuproper management at the plant.
B. Poor record keeping practices.
i q. Lark of commmunication between plant and City Hall.
Council Meeting - 11/13/89
For the reasons stated above, the City entered into an agreement with PSG
to operate the Wastewater Treatment Plant. Simola went on to outline the
positive working relationship that has been established in the last three
years. Simola completed his presentation by noting to Council that staff
favors continued contract operations of the City's Wastewater Treatment
Plant through private partnership with Professional Services Group.
Although the city staff has been negotiating with Professional Services
Group for several imnths, it was Simla's view that the contract before
Council lathe best compromise the City is able to reach. The City could
request further negotiations with PSG, however, it is not likely that
further negotiations would result in significant benefits to the City.
Dan Blonigen noted that under Article G, paragraph 7, point 4, PSG is in
the driver's seat when it comes to defining the grounds for determination
of the contract. The new grounds for termination consist of two serious
performance related incidents within one 60 day period. Dan Blonigen was
concerned that that the definintion of serious performance related
incidents should be defined by the City and not by PSG.
Representatives from PSG indicated that they would be mre than willing
to let Council determine which incidents are defined as serious.
Representatives from PSG also noted that in spite of this language, the
City has significant power and that the City must make a check to PSG
once a month. If problems are not corrected, the City can simply
withhold their payment to PSG.
Ren Maus asked why the contract length did go from 3 years to 5 years.
Dan Blonigen noted that he would favor a 3 year contract. PSG is
performing well. They need not worry about the City continuing with them
after year 3.
Wolfsteller noted that a 5 year contract, if reasonable, will save the
City the cost and time assoc'3ted with the bidding process.
Motion made by Dan Blonigen and seconded by Shirley Anderson to approve
the new contract with rofessional Services Group as presented to City
Council for an initial annual amount of S32d,070. Motion carried
unanimously.
14. Consideration of odor control measures for the Wastewater Collection
System and Wastewater Treatment Plant.
John Simola explained that for some of our previous agenda items dealing
with renewal of PSG's contract, staff has tried to explain the Current
odor control problems at the Wastewater Treatment Plant and how efforts
to deal with the problem have been less than 100% successful. We have
now received the report from Davis Processing Division, a representative
for ODIPAS. Their report centers on odor control survey and
recommendations for an odor control program resulting for an inspection
on October 12, 1909. In addition, we received the teat results from
ambles taken in and about the collection system and treatment plant
innediately following the original survey. Simola went on to present the
information from the tests and outlined staff recommendation as follows.
7 6P
Council Minutes - 11/13189
It was the recormnendation of the Public Works Director that the council
authorize additional testing and installat-ion of the pilot chemical feed
system, which is an injection system in the coliertion system, with the
assistance of PSG at a -etup cost of $1,000, plus a :ental cost of $400
per month, plus chemicals as needed at $1.18 per gallon, plus additional
testing as - quired. Erti- .ced initial cost of this alternative is in
the area of ::3,001).
Ken Maus asked, "If Sunny Fresh completes briprovements to our
specifications would this eliminate the problem?".
John Simola noted that ironically, the changes trade at Sunny Fresh may
have actually increased the problem..
Ren also asked, "Should we consider assigning the cost to remedy
industrial related set•ar problems to industrial users?". Simola stated,
"We may not be able to directly assess, but rates would effectively place
the cost with hish users. Additional study will be done.".
After further discussion, motion by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Dan
Bionigen to install a test pilot chemical feed injection system at an
estimated initial cost of $3,000. Motion carried unanimously.
15. Consideration of resolution adopting a proposed preliminary 1990 budget
and setting a proposed tax levy.
men Maus noted that this proposed tax levy is preliminary only and it is
likely that there will be a few items trimmed from the budget.
Motion to adopt a resolution setting a proposed levy of $2,778,506 trade
by Warren Smith, seconded by Dan Blonigen. notion carried unanimously.
SEE RESOLUTION 89-34.
16. Consideration of installing street light at private driveways requested
by the Plaza Carwash on Highway 25.
John Simola discussed the pros and cons of installing a street light at
this location. After this review, Ken Maus noted that there might be a
chance to correct the lighting problem by singly by reorienting the
existing street lights and asking the Plaza Carwach to modify their
light, also. Maus suggested that this alternative be atterpted prior to
installation of a new street light.
Motion trade by Fran Fair and seconded by Warren Smith to follaw the
suggestion made above by Ken Maus. Motion carried unanimously.
17. Consideration of hiring rink attendants for winter skating facilities.
John Simola noted that after a fire at the Fcurth Street warming house
last winter North Star Risk Services, a risk assessment coiryumy who
performs loss control surveys for insurance companies, stated the City
should install self extinguishing waste cans in our wdnning house.
Additionally, they suggested that we post appropriate warning rules
signs. Lastly, the North Star Services ask that we consider adult
supervision for City rink areas during periods of peak ups. This was
again atreosed in their October 6th letter regarding the pond skating.
8 � i
Council Minutes - 11/13/89
Simola went on to outline the proposed hours of peak use which would
include weekdays from 4-9 p.m., Saturdays from 9 a.m, to 6 p.m., and
Sundays from 1 p.m. to 6 p.m.. This would total approximately 31 hours
per facility, excluding holidays or Christmas vacation, which would bring
the average hours per week during our overall season up to 35. The total
estimated cost to provide rink attendants per the recommendation of North
Star Risk Services amounts to $2,300.
Ken Maus stated that he is concerned that the rinks are not getting used
enough and that it might be difficult to justify hiring of a rink
attendant if the rinks are not getting significant use.
Ken Maus also noted that he would be in favor of establishing some rules
as to when the rink attendant will be a the ice rink. For instance, we
may want to close the rinks when the temperature drops below a certain
tc:�c:otu:c.
Simola noted that he, along with the Park Superintendent and City
Attorney, will be developing a list of ice rink rules of operation.
After discussion motion made by Warren Smith and seconded by Dan Blonigen
to provide rink attendants for the two warming houses during peak skating
times, as outlined by the park superintendent and is recommended by North
Star Services at an estimated cost of $1,148 per season, for a total cost
of approximately $2,300. Motion carried unanimously.
18. Consideration of setting a meeting for the purpose of establishing a 1990
salary wage policy for nonunion personnel.
After discussion, motion made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by ?ran Fair
to set a meeting for said purpose at 6:30 p.m., December 4, 1989. Mution
carried unanimously.
19. Consideration of�roDosed supplement to cooperative construction
agreement witn MN -DOT for upgrading Hwy 25.
John Simola explained that during the original upgrading of Highway 25,
which took place several years ago, the State of Minnesota agreed to
plant shrubs along the Hillside Cemetery to reduce maintenance and
beautify the area. This planting was to be 1008 State of Minnesota
cost. When the original agreement came through, this was not the case
and the agreement stated that it was at City cost. At that time the City
was informed it would be impractical to amend the entire agreement and
the State would follow up later with a supplemental agreement.
After discussion, motion was made by Warren Smith and seconded by
Shirley Anderson to authorize the proposed supplemental agreement
transferring the responsibility of the cost of the shrubbery from the
City to the State of Minnesota. Motion carried unanimously.
Staff informed Council that Mr. Eisele has asked the City to burn a
residential structure located near the fire hall. Nen Maus noted that
unless the fire department sees a training value, he suggested that the
9
Council Minutes - 11113189
City not get involved in burning this structure. Dan 8lonigen also noted
that safety is the coin issue and that the property owner should
compensate the City to cover the training expense.
John Siirola requested that the Council provide authorization to
temporarily maintain the street right of way associated with the Meadows
Second Addition and the Marvin Elwood Road extension. It was Simola's
view that the improvements are nearly complete and that the City may at
this time undertake plowing of streets and other general maintenance of
the utilities until final approval in the near future..
Motion made by Warren Smith and seconded by Fran Fair to authorize snow
removal maintenance of 8edman Lane and Marvin Elwood Road. Motion
carried unanimously.
There being no further discvvsion, mccting ad;ournad.
JetNeill
Assistant Administrator
C
10 0 v�J
Council Agenda - 11/27/89
4. Consideration of accepting park dedication fee - West Prairie Partners
subdivision plat. (RW)
A. REFERENCE. AND BACKGROUND:
At the previous Council meeting, approval was given to the West Prairie
Partners subdivision plat located adjacent to Pinewood Elementary
School. The only item left to discuss concerns the park dedication fee
required by City ordinances consisting either of 10% of the land or 10%
of the market value in cash.
When the preliminary plat was approved :n May of 1989, the developers
proposed making a cash contribution rather than land donation to
accomplish the park dedication requirements. Enclosed with the agenda
you will find a letter from Mr. Jim Metcalf, dated May 4, 1989, outlining
how they arrived at what they feel is the market value of this 2-1/2 acre
pdreel at appu,xbmately $17,000. Although it has always been assured by
the City staff, and I believe also the Council, that we would be
accepting cash rather than land since this plat is located next to the
elementary school, it has never been determined whether we were agreeable
to the proposed $1,700 as meeting the requirements.
Our subdivision ordinances specify that cash contribution is to be
determined by an appraisal of the property establishing the market value
prior to any improvements. The developer is responsible for submitting
an appraisal and if the Council so elects can order an additional
appraisal on its own. In either case, the appraisals are the
responsibility of the developer.
As you can see from the proposal submitted by Mr. Metcalf., they are
basing the market value of their 2-1/2 acre parcel by subtracting off the
two lots of the former Assembly of God Church property to arrive at a
value of $77,000 for the Assembly of God Church which was traded for the
Baptist Church property. They are also deducting the existing home that
was sold for $60,000, leaving what they feel is the market value of the
2-1/2 acre parcel at $17,000. Although I certainly follow their logic in
arriving at this cost figure, this should not be considered an appraisal,
and I do not know if this id truly the market value of the 2-1/2 acre raw
piece of land. Taking this procedure one step further, if they had sold
the existing house for $77,000, then I would assume they would not be
proposing any park dedication at all since their actual cost would have
been zero. It could be assumed that they actually got a good deal on the
2-1/2 acres that have been platted and is not necessarily the true market
value. prior to the Sirynoveirents. Since the final plat has been approved
and is ready for the necessary signatures, the only step remaining to to
arrive at a fair park dedication requirement.
B. ALTERNATIVE. ACTIONS:
1. Accept the proposal made on Flay 4, 1989, by the developers and
establish the market value at $17,000 for the 2-1/2 acres, which
j wuuld amuunt Lu $1,700 du d cash cunliibutluu.
N
Council Agenda - 11/27/89
2. Request the developers obtain an actual appraisal of the property for
Council review and determine the park dedication based on 10% of this
value.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Although the staff does not dispute the net cost the developers have in
the 2-1/2 acre parcel, the staff does question whether this is truly the
market value of the property without obtaining an actual appraisal.
Because the developers purchase involved acquiring one piece of property
and selling off a portion of the property and then tra?ing the balance
for the parcel they now have and then also selling off an existing home
to arrive at this cost, accepting this method of determining market value
could cause problems in the future, as it really has no bearing on true
market value because of the coirplicated transaction that occurred. It
would appear that if the City plans on its ordinance and
requiring appraisals to determine market value, it may be best. to have an
outside appraiser establish the market value for this property. It also
becomes difficult to compare a small 2-1/2 acre tract of land with other
recent subdivisions such as the Par West subdivision in that usually the
per acre price is imich lower on a larger piece of property than it is on
a smaller piece. If the Council feels that $17,000 is an accurate market
value for this property and does not wish to require the developer to
provide an appraisal, you can accept the $1,700 as proposed.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the may 4, 1989, letter from develorxer.
l
ArTURNEYS AT LAW
P.O. a= uE
30 Waal B,oaftp
MORUCO q MtrweWU 15762011E
JAMES 0. MUCALF 1F1 1`I9I014F.
BRAut.EY V. LARSON May 4, 1989 017)2F,3232
MEtn0
(012)121.3393
Mr. Fick Wolfsteller
City Administrator
Monticello City Hall
250 East Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362
REt PROPOSED PLAT OF WEST PRAIRIE PARTNERS
Dear Mr. Wolfsteller
At its meeting on May 2, 1989, the Planning Cununi.ss.ion
recommended the approval of Lhe above -referenced plaL withuut
qualification. It is my understanding that this will came before
the Council on the 8th of May, and it would be our intention to
make a cash contribution, rather than a land donation to
accomplish the park requirements.
As most of the town already knows, our acquisition cost was
$110,000.00 and we have entered into a Contract for Deed
arrangement to sell the two 12) lots on Fourth Street for
$33,000.00 and have, recently nold the, st:ruuturn 11n rhe• farmor
Baptist property for a net $60,000.00. This wuuld lilacs our cont;
on the two and ono -half acre parcel at approximately $.17,000.00
or $G,600.00 per acro. ACeordinyly, we are prepared to offer a
$1,700.00 contribution to Satisfy the park requirement.
We also aro interested in retaining Mr. John Badalich to
prepare the plans and specifications for the installation of the
water, sanitary sewer, streets and curbs. Since this appears to
be a relatively straight forward project where no great
discretion would be used as to how the project should be
designed, we do not believe that there would be any cunfllcL
using Mr. Dadnlich, and we would desire to avoid the additional
expense of getting an extra engineer involved. 1 have discussed
this matter generally with Mr. Badalich in the pant, and I
believe that lie will taquire that lie gets permission to do so
from you, or the Council.
If you have any questions or wish to discuss the matters
raised in this letter further, please call me at your
convenience.
Sincerely,
METC F LARSON ter.
ny:
JGM:dins Jam r3 MoLca1L,�P y.
In response to the above captioned matter, as far as I am
concerned the City has now had almost seven months to come up
with a determination and I can see of no reason to attend yet
another meeting on November 27th. we have attended numerous
meetings in the past and have talked to the city staff on
numerous occasions, and particularly this matter has been before.
the Planning Commission twice and the Council twice regarding the
subdivision of this parcel alone. why the matter requires an
additional meeting is a mystery to me and I will assume you can
carry on without my participation.
Also be advised that West Prairie Partners will not pay for the
cost of the City making an appraisal, or anybody else making an
appraisal, without first having an arrangement concerning who
shall do the appraisal, the extent of the appraisal, and the fee
involved. The idea of having the property appraised when there
is recent evidence of a transaction makes little sense, and oven
less when the City and County have appraisers available for
establishing the market value of property for real estate tax
purposes.
I trust that you will, provide the Council with the substance of
this letter, or a copy of, it, at or in advanco of the November
27th meeting. If you wish to discuss this further, please
contact me at your convenience. if you concludo that I am not
Impressed with the time delay encountered and the manner in which
the Council may proceed, and I expect they probably would if you
recommend it, you are quite correct.
Sincerely,
METCALF i 118504 7
By:
James Metcalf, $4q.
JGM: ab l/.J�
I//a(tal� C9 eCaiton
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
P.O. am us
3UV" emWrq
U0.1"1%UV.W ons!{ U4W
November 22, 1989
JAMESO. METCALF
TELEPHONE
SRADLV V. LARSON
(512) 2953232
Mr. Rick Wolfsteller
METRO
(612M)421-=
City Administrator
250 E. Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362
RE: Your letter dated November 20, 1989 regarding west
Prairie Partners
Subdivision
Dear Mr. wolfsteller:
In response to the above captioned matter, as far as I am
concerned the City has now had almost seven months to come up
with a determination and I can see of no reason to attend yet
another meeting on November 27th. we have attended numerous
meetings in the past and have talked to the city staff on
numerous occasions, and particularly this matter has been before.
the Planning Commission twice and the Council twice regarding the
subdivision of this parcel alone. why the matter requires an
additional meeting is a mystery to me and I will assume you can
carry on without my participation.
Also be advised that West Prairie Partners will not pay for the
cost of the City making an appraisal, or anybody else making an
appraisal, without first having an arrangement concerning who
shall do the appraisal, the extent of the appraisal, and the fee
involved. The idea of having the property appraised when there
is recent evidence of a transaction makes little sense, and oven
less when the City and County have appraisers available for
establishing the market value of property for real estate tax
purposes.
I trust that you will, provide the Council with the substance of
this letter, or a copy of, it, at or in advanco of the November
27th meeting. If you wish to discuss this further, please
contact me at your convenience. if you concludo that I am not
Impressed with the time delay encountered and the manner in which
the Council may proceed, and I expect they probably would if you
recommend it, you are quite correct.
Sincerely,
METCALF i 118504 7
By:
James Metcalf, $4q.
JGM: ab l/.J�
Council Agenda - 11/27/89
Consideration of City participation in financing a portion of the
Evergreens Subdivision development costs via the assessment process.
0.0. )
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
As you recall, about a Month ago Kent Kjellberg asked for feedback from
Council regarding the potential of utilizing the assessment process to
assist with the financing of the Evergreens Subdivision iuproveMents. At
that time, Council asked that staff prepare more information or. the
matter and bring a potential financing formula back to Council for
further review. Before getting into a description of a potential
financing plan, I would like to address a number of issues associated
with this development.
IAN AND MODERATE INCONE HOUSING DVWZ
It may be that Mr. Kjeliberg has not been able to receive private
financing for this project in part because the demand for the 48 lots
that will be created is not strong enough to warrant the risk associated
with the high coat to install the Phase I utilities. According to the
rough estimates we have been able to pull together on total project cost,
it appears that the per lot coat for the first 43 lots in this
development will equal almost $13,000, and that is without any land cost
incorporated into the price. The reason why these lots are relatively
expensive to because an expensive lateral sewer and water connection must
be made in order to serve the development. This added cost drives up the
per lot cost of this development.
The high utilities cost per lot with Phase I would not be as much of an
Issue if the type of housing planned for that area was not low and
moderate income housing. The goal of the developer is to create
inexpensive, affordable lots for individuals that have been locked out of
tho single family housing market. I au not sure to what degree the added
coat to extend the utilities to the development area reduces the ability
of the developer to create lots at a price that is low enough to attract
the sector of the market that the developer is after.
Staff is concerned that the demand for housing in this particular area
may not be great and that it will take a considerable time to sell the 43
lots associated with Phase I. At present, there ars about 80 buildable
home sites within the city of Monticello and about 25 now homes built per
year. If all of the new homes in the city were built in this
development, it would take about two years to fill it up. Obviously, not
all of the new hors in Monticello will be built in the Evergreens
Subdivision. At the acme time, however, if the price of the lots is low
enough and if first tim home buyer financing is available, this
development could possibly develop relatively quickly. All in all, it is
difficult to say how fast this development will actually fill in. It
could be two years, it could be six years. Whatever the can may be, it
is important to temraber that the longer it takes fur the develuymwnt to
occur, the ware expensive the project becomes, as the interest on the
cost to install the utilities keeps mounting as the project lays vacant.
Council Agenda - 11/27/89
KJELLBERG FAST POLLUTION PROBLEM
It is staff's view that if it was not for the pollution problem
associated with the East Park, the City would not likely be getting
involved in assisting with the financing of this development. In
response to PCA pressure, Mr. Kjellberg has installed a temporary sewer
system. This system is marginal at best and does not come near meeting
PCA guidelines.
In addition to providing lots for first time home buyers, the Evergreens
Subdivision provides for the extension of city sewer service to a point
at which the Kjellberg East Mobile Hone Park can utilize city sewer and
water and, thus, correct this pollution problem. It appears that the
single most important reason why the City would participate in this
particular project is because City participation would result in the
correction of the Kjellberg East Labile Iioca Park pollution -problem.
OTHER ISSUES
statistics reveal that there does appear to be a pent up demand for
affordable single family housing in Monticello. As you know, a
considerable number of apartment units have developed in the last few
years along with the existing mobile hoe parker and in addition to that,
there are a considerable number of homes within the community that are
occupied by renters. within that renter community, there are many that
wish to own their own home. It ie not known at this time what the actual
raw number of individuals is that wish to own, their own home, and it
also not known what their income levels are.
If one of the City Council's goals is to encourage development of single
family housing, is this a location where the City wishes to invest its
money? If providing affordable lots to an issue, there are other
properties within the community that could be developed more cheaply than
the property in question. Therefore, should we be looking at other
property that can be developed more economically.
If the City's goal to to remove an environmental threat created by the
Fast Park sewer, system, is there another cheaper way to correct the
problem? It say be an option for the City to examine the cost of a
.shallow force min to be run along the County right -of -may all the way to
Dundas.. The cost of this project could be assessed back to the
benefiting property owner. The coat of this projectisnot known at this
timel however, staff may wish to explore looking at this as an option.
Another method which might be used to correct the mobile homes park sewer
problem is to actually encourage development of an on-site septic
system. This alternative may not be feasible because not enough land is
available to properly develop this type of system. In addition, the City
my not want to encourage development of an expensive on-site system when
some day we will be serving this area. At the same time, however, it may
bw that sleftluiMmnl ur au oryenciva oa-sits system can be justified
because it will be a considerable length of time before city services
actually reach this area.
Council Agenda - 11/27/89
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to grant concept approval to City participation in 508 of the
Evergreens Subdivision development cost contingent on the following:
a. Sewer and water services shall be extended completely through
Phase I and Phase II with streets, curb, and gutter installed
with Phase I.
b. Kjellberg East Mobile Home Park mmmst be connected to the city
sewer service at the southerly most Phase II manhole.
C. Enlargement of the mobile home park will be allowed only after
the sewer extension is complete and operational and in compliance
with City specifications. in addition, street ixprovemnents must
be complete and storm sewer plans approved and in place.
d. The formula used in providing credit to the East Park area
assessmc nt per, thc original developer agreement would remain.
The original developer agreement stated that the area assessment
for the Kjellberg East Mobile Home Park would be reduced an
amount equal to the cost to extend utilities from Dundas to the
development. Since Kjellberg will be paying 508 of this cost, it
was concluded that this credit could remain.
e. The area assessument formula associated with Phase I development
shall be consistent with the original developer agreement. Under
the original developer agreemnent, the lots with Phase I and II
would be charged an added $200 hookup fee for sewer and water,
and all properties in this area would pay a $4 per quarter
surcharge on their water bill. These funds will be used for the
future extension of trunk sewer and water to the area when it is
needed.
I. Kjellberg shall be responsihle for all costs associated with the
lift station and piping necessary to provide sewer service to the
mobile home park. Development of this facility will meet City
requirements.
Under this alternative, the City will contribute one-half of the cost
to extend the utilities, which will amount to approximately
$275,000. In addition, the environmental problem associated with the
park will be rectified. IL should be noted that the developer will
be financing 508 of the cost of the lots, which mitigates inch of. the
City's financial risk in that in the event the assessments are not
paid, time. City can retrieve the property and sell it, thereby
recovering much of the original cost. Under this agreement, however,
the process involved in recovering the property can be long and drawn
out, and it could be seven years between default and the time in
which the property is recovered. That time period allows the
interest on the original City expense to mmunt. And it, therefore,
might be questionable as to whether or not the City could recover its
cost if the property is to be recovered utilizing the tax delinquency
process.
/
Council Agenda - 11/27/89
2. Motion to approve City participation in the Evergreens Subdivision by
financing a portion of the development cost as defined by Council.
Under this alternative, Council may want to adjust the 508 level to
some other percentage it deems more appropriate; and it can modify or
add any conditions that are listed above.
3. Motion to withhold participation in this project.
There are a number of reasons why Council may balk at participation
in this project:
1) Although the developer is contributing 50% of the project cost,
if the project fails and assessments are not paid, the City could
lose a portion of its investment even it it gets the property
tack within the time allotted by la-.
2) There seem to be indicators that this project may not fill out as
quickly as is hoped by the developer.
a. The utilities expense per lot is high and, therefore, not
consistent with the goal of attracting low and moderate
income hone buyers.
b. The housing demand, though present, is not clearly defined.
c. The physical features of the development may limit its appeal
in that there are power linea, gas lines, and no trees in the
area. There is a concern that people may silrply not want to
live in this area.
Under this alternative, the City would need to come up with an
alternate plan for correcting the environmental problems associated
with the East Park sewer discharge. One of two plans would need to
be executed which would call for either developur_nt of a proper
on-site system or development of a long, shallow force main extending
to the city system.
4. Council may wish to table this matter pending development of further
information.
Such information would include 1) development of a better
understanding of the housing market and potential for rapid sale of
the individual lots; 2) take a closer look at the potential and cost
to extend a shallow force main to service the Kjellberg Fast Mobile
Home Park and look at the potential for encouraging ttjellberg to
develop an approved on-site sewer systemt 3) investigate potential
for City participation in Minnesota Housing Finance Agency programs
which would result in development of a pool of uoney to be utilized
by individuals wishing to develop homes in this area. Money would be
loaned through this program to these individuals at Minnesota Housing
Financing Agency rates or first tflne home buyer rates, which are leas
I.han Lhu IWLk6L 1'a LC -S.
Council Agenda - 11/27/89
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Originally, Mr. Kjellberg had indicated he would be installing privately
his own sewer, water, and street construction for the Evergreens
development. Since Mr. Kjellberg has had some difficulty in selling the
development to other interested developers, Mr. Kjellberg is basically
inquiring as to what level of participation the City would be willing to
consider to help get this project going. Although Kent has not
petitioned for the iirprovements at this point, he has had some developers
interested in the property; but the question has come up whether the
developer will be responsible for all of the cost privately or whether
the City would consider doing it under Chapter 429 and assessing the
project for all or a portion of the cost.
I believe it's the staff's opinion that the City should be a little
reluctant to crnsider 100; of
financing for this project. iraLurally, Lhe
more up front money provided by the developer, the less risk there is for
the City. In order to encourage development of the Evergreens, the City
may have to get involved in a 429 project; but staff feels that -the large
percentage of the project cost should be provided by the developer to
avoid pure speculation putting all the risk on the City. The staff
certainly sees an advantage to the City participating in this project if
we can also solve the sewer problem at the East Kjellberg Trailer Park
As a result, at a miniimim, if this becomes a City project, we believe
Mr. Kjellberg should be required to hook up the trailer park to our
sanitary sewer system as part of Phase I. As far as the amount of
participation required from the developer, we have used 50% for your
consideration; but this percentage could he adjusted if you wish.
As a result, staff would support alternatives 11 or i2 provided the
Kjellberg East Trailer Park is connected as part of this project. For
the City to continue to grow and provide residential development, it may
be necessary for the City to get involved again in Chapter 429 projects
to help finance these improvements. But at the same time, the City has
to be cautious as to the amount of up front money that 1s required to
ensure that a developer Is serious and has his own equity involved in the
project.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Cost breakdown estimate using 506 up front money and 708 up front unney;
Area map.
PROGRAM FOR CITY PARTICIPATION
IN EVERGREENS SUBDIVISION
CITY PARTICIPATIO 50%
IN PHASE 1 UTILITIES
ONLY.
TALL UTILITIES ISANITARY IL1FT STATICNITOTAL
IPHASE 1, INCLOSISEWER IAND PIPES I
1DUNDAS ERTEN ITHROUGH ISERVING MOB I
I IPHASE 2 IHOME PARK I
I I I I
TOTAL COST
I $549.000 1 $25.000 1 $30.000 1$604.060
($450, 000-22%)
I I I I
CITY
I I I I
1 $274,500 1 so I $0 1$274,500
I I I 1
DEVELOPER
trul'Ic�'tY t4kltl•Kt.t'IYY
I I I I
1 $274,500 1 $25.000 1 $30,000 1$329,500
I I I I
11.�Y.Y<tY lt—�tY-1�K+Y /t Y1/iYttRY tY�1AY• MYtt�l y
1
NUMBER OF LOTS
48
DEVELOPED PHASE
1
CAST PER LOT
$11,438
CITY PARTICIPATIO
30%
IN PHASE 1 UTILITIES
ONLY.
TALL UTILITIES ISANITARY (LIFT STATICNITOTAL
[PHASE 1, INCLDSISEWER [AND PIPES I
10UNDAS ERTEN ITHROUGH ISERVING MOB I
I IPHASE 2 IHOME PARK I
I I I I
TOTAL COST
1 $549,000 1 $25,000 1 $30,000 1$604,000
($450,000`229)
1 I I I
/ CITY
I I I I
1 $164,700 1 $0 1 $0 1$164,700
DEVELOPER
I I I I
1 $384,300 1 $25.000 1 $30,000 1$439,300
I I 1 1
i
1„
Council Agenda - 11/27/89
6. Consideration of final payment on Project ¢89-1, Marvin Elwood Road Extension
In the Meadows. (public project) (J.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The city of Monticello contracted with Channel Construction to extend Marvin
Elwood Road as part of the Meadows Improvement Project. The estimated cost of
the contract was $100582.10. The final construction cost of the project is
$10,582.10. The City to date has paid all but $1,000 of this amount.
The work has been completed on the extension of Marvin Elwood Road. The work
has been found to be satisfactory and the city staff recoumnends final payment
to Channel Construction. Final payment will be in the amount of $1,000 and is
pending receipt of the proper lien waivers and the State of Minnesota forms.
B. AL UERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Make final payment to Channel Construction in the amount of $1,000,
pending receipt of lien waivers and State of Minnesota required forms.
2. Not to make final payment.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is the staff recounnendation that City Council authorize payment in the
amount of $1,000 to Channel Construction as outlined in alternative $1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of original bid sheet for the project. 4
R
r
r
MEYER-ROHLIN, INC. (�
t lGiNEERS-LAND SURVEYORS 1111 Hwv 25 N.. Buffalo, Minn. 55313 Phone 612.682.1781
\ October 19, 1989
City of Monticello
c/o Jeff O'Neil, Asst Administrator
250 East Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362
Re: Marvin Elwood Road
The Meadows Second Addition
Monticello, Minnesota
Dear Mr. O'Neil:
The Contractor for the above referenced project has requested partial
payment for work completed to date. Below you shall find the
quantities for the work performed.
I
BID "A" - Street: Marvin Elwood Road
i Item
Bid
Inst.
No. Item
Qty.
Qty,
Unit
Unit Price
Total Price
1. Subgrade preparation
1285
1316
a. y.
$
0.45
$
592.20
2. Class 5 gravel
(CV)(inplace)
315
309
C. y.
$
9.30
$
2873.70
3. 1.}" bituminous base
course. MHD 2331
1115
1132
s.y.
$
2.00
$
2264.00
4. 1+" bituminous wear
course, MHD 2341
1115
1132
a. y.
$
2.10
$
2377.20
5. Surmountable concrete
curb G gutter
550
550
1.f.
$
4.50
$
2475.00
6. Seeding
0.15
0
acre
$
3000.00
$
0.00
TOTAL
BID "A"
$10&582&10
memmemm■
l
1„oro P. Meyer, Professional Engineer Robert Rohlin. Licensed Land Surveyor
TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE $10,582.10
LESS RETAINAGE $ 1,000.00
LESS PREVIOUS PARTIAL PAYMENTS $ 0.00
PARTIAL PAYMENT #1 $_9.582.10
We therefore recommend Partial Payment #1 be made to Channel
Construction, Inc., in the amount of $9582.10.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely yours,
MEYER-ROHLIN, INC.
Norman Gartner
Profe$sional Engineer
sl
cc: File: E-8938
Channel Construction Co., Inc.
H.C.H. Construction, Inc.
(90
17
vap J'c
29.03vc:t
89A
s
lt�10±-�
S HILL
n
Council Agenda - 11/27/89
7. Consideration of resolutions ordering preparation of assessment roll and
setting a public hearing on adoption of assessment roll on Marvin Elwood
Road extension - Meadows Subdvision. (R.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
This past suimner, the developers of the Meadows Second Addition had
engineers, Meyer-Rohlin of Buffalo, prepare plans and specifications for
phase I of the Meadows Second Addition. In addition to this private
development, Meyer-Rohlin prepared plans and specifications for improving
Marvin Elwood Road extension from the Meadows to River Street eliminating
the dead-end. The City of Monticello used the plans and specifications
and advertised for bids on this City portion of the iiuprovement.
Channel Construction of St. Michael was the low bidder and has recently
coirpleted the project to the City's satisfaction. The contract price is
$10,582.10 plus indirect cost for inspection services and legal fees,
etc.
With the coirpletion of the project, an assessment hearing can be
scheduled in the near future to assess the cost to the two benefiting
property owners, Mr. Edgar Klucas and the newly created Lot 1 of the
Meadows Second Addition. At the time this project was ordered, the
Council gave the developer an understanding that the total assessment for
Lot 1 for the 81-1 project and this street extension would not exceed
$8,500. The 81-1 assessment for this corner lot totaled $6,179.92,
leaving a balance of $2,320.08 that could be assessed to arrive at the
$8,500 total.
If the Council still is agreeable to this maxtinim assessment, the $2,320
aimunt divided by the front footage of. 7.18 feet equals $10.64 per foot.
Applying this $10.64 per foot to Mr. Klucas's side of the road would
amw nt to an assessment of $3,226. This would appear to be a logical way
of assessing Mr. Klucas's portion of the project and would result in
approximately one-half of the project cost being placed on ad valorem and
one-half being assessable.
The purpose of this agenda item is not to arrive at an assessment figure,
but I thought this info enation would refresh your memory in regards to
the project. For tonight's meeting, the only action needed by the
Council is to adopt two resolutions ordering the preparation of the
assessment roll and setting a public hearing date.
B. ALTERNATIVE. ACTIONS:
1. Adopt the resolutions ordering the preparation of the assessment roll
and setting a public hearing date for the first meeting in
January 1990.
2. Do not adopt the resolutions - Not a feasible alternative since the
project is couplete and the assesamnt roll can i,v riiaa.
Council Agenda - 11/27/89
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recomends that both resolutions be adopted now that the
project has been completed and accepted. If the Council is still in
agreement with not assessing the corner parcel along Marvin Elwood Road
more than $8,500 total, I will prepare the notices and actual assessment
roll based on this assumption utilizing approximately one-half of the
cost for ad valorem.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Two resolutions for adoption.
10
RESOLUTION 89 -
RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND
ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
WHEREAS, a contract has been let and the costs determined for the improvement
of Marvin Elwood Road Extension to River Street with curb, gutter, bituminous
paving, and appurtenant work, and the contract price for such improvement
is $10,582.10 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making
of such improvements amount to $703.84 so that the total cost of the
improvement will be $11,285.94
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA:
The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is
hereby estimated to be $5,739.48 and the portion of the cost to be
assessed against benefited property owners is estimated to be
55.546.46
2. The City Administrator shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be
specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot,
piece, or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to
cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in his office for public inspection.
Adopted by the Council this 27th day of November, 1989.
Ken Maus, Mayor
Rick Wolfsteller
City Administrator
6)
RESOLUTION B9 -
RESOLUTION SETTING A HEARING
ON THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on November 27, 1989, the City
Administrator was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of
improving Marvin Elwood Road Extension to River Street with curb, gutter,
bituminous paving, and appurtenant work and
WHEREAS, the City Administrator has notified the Council that such proposed
assessment shall be complete and filed in his office for public inspection.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA:
A hearing shall be held on the 8th day of January, 1990, in the City Hall
at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment, and at such time and
place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be
given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment.
The City Administrator is hereby directed to cause a notice of the
hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official
newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in
the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed
assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings.
Adopted by the Council this 27th day of November, 1989.
Rick Woltsteller
City Administrator
I
Ken Maus, Mayor
0
Council Agenda - 11/27/89
B, Consideration of accepting the improvements associated with the Meadows
Second Addition (private project). (J.O., J.S.)
A. REFERENCE. AND BACKGROUND:
Council is asked to consider accepting the improvements associated with
the Meadows Second Addition, which included development of a portion of
Crocus Lane and installation of sewer and water services. The
development created 10 new lots. According to the City Engineer and the
Public Works Director, the work has been successfully completed except
for a few minor details which should be coiripleted prior to formal
acceptance.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to accept the Meadows Second Addition iirprovements subject to
the following conditions which the developer has 30 days to supply:
a. As built drawings showing the actual locations, etc., of the
public improvements to be submitted to the City Engineer along
with a certification from the developer's engineer that all
firprovements have been installed per the specifications.
b. The developer's engineer shall submit to the City a detailed
grading plan of Lot 1, Block I, which would outline a plan for
draining this lot to the northern Burlington Northern
right-of-way.
C. An escrow aim unt of $50n shall be established for the purpose of
providing funds necessary to fully seed the street boulevards.
d. The warranty bond shall name the City of Monticello as the third
party beneficiary of the warranty.
e. The developer shall pay $2.,512, which equals the City expenses
associated with inspecting the improvement. Please note that
these expenses were higher than originally anticipated because
the developer's contractor failed to properly notify the City of
work being done which necessitated additional time to track the
project and stay on top of the work as it occurred.
f. Receipt of lien waivers and State forms.
2. Motion to deny acceptance of the lmprovemnts at this time.
As you can see, there are a number of details that need to be cleaned
up prior to acceptance. Council inay wish to take the view that these
items need to be taken care of prior to approval taking place. it
may be, however, that by the time the meeting rolls around, some of
these items trey be already taken care of.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recomends that the iirprovements be accepted subject to the
conditions listed. According to the developer's engineer, Meyer-Rohlin,
the as builto, grading plan, lien waivers, and warranty bond issues will
be taken care of prior to the meeting. With these items in place„ there
appears to he no reason why the City should not accept these
6 improvements.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Map outlining development area. a�
II
0 Zo
0
"9
-t!13 -7
.O!A
E
Council Agenda - 11/27/89
Consideration of replacing electric motor for deep well turban pump in well $1.
(J.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Approximately three years ago when the 60 h.p. motor for well $1 failed, we
replaced it with a 75 h.p. motor, as recommended by OSM. It was expected that
the 75 h.p. motor would be able to handle the higher head pressures expected
when the new water reservoir went on line.
At the July 10th meeting this year the City Council authorizes; OSM to evaluate
well /1 and make design recomm endations for the replacement of the pummp.
Calculations for the proposed pumping capacity in heads were somewhat
complicated as the pummp needed to perform at low head instances when the new
tank had very little water in it and at high head when the tank was operating
at full capacity. There was some doubt as to whether the existing 75 h.p.
motor was going to have the capdbilities necessary iu dcwmpiish this.
OSM completed their computer runs and study and made a recomendation on
August 11, 1989. Their recoimnendation was that we use the existing 75 h.p.
motor and gave the expected pummping rates, utilizing an American 3 stage line
turban pump. As per City Council authorization, we had E.H. Renner b Sons
install the recom ended pump at a cost of $7,484.00 , which did not include
some of the parts that we had on hand, wiring costs, or the cost of the check
valve purchased from the city of Maple Grove for $500.
During the startup a problem was noticed forediately. with 10' of water in the
new tank, the pump pumped 1,422 gallons per minute, at a system demand of
approximately 500,000 gallons per day and the mm for overheated iimnediately. A
check of the motor ammperage draw found it to be operating at or above its
maximum capacity and is incapable of sustaining the load for any length of
time. It is apparent that the discharge head is slightly less than was
expected and/or the pump requirements are not as expected, and the mentor cannot
operate in that range.
To clarify this situation it is important that the Council understand that
generally with a lower discharge pressure, a pump pumps more water and
therefore requires more horsepower. As the head is increased, the pummp pumps
less water and less horsepower is required. If we were to operate well S2 with
a low system demand and the water tank full, it is conceivable that it could
operate within its horsepower range. However, during a high demand or when the
tank is low the pup motor would immediately burn out. As a solution we have
considered increasing the discharge pressure by temporarily closing a valve
immediately after the pump, thereby causing the pump to pummp mnuch less water.
This allowed the pump to pummp only 1,150 gallons per minute and drop the
horsepower requirement down into the range that the motor could tolerate. It
did, however increase the discharge pressure above 90 p.s.i. and we began to
have couplications with the chlorine oystem. It is not practical to try to
throttle the flow manually during periods of low head and it would not be
beneficial to couplicate the system with an electronically controlled
throttling valve. 1t therefore appears to be best to replace the 75 h.p. motor
i with the next largest motor, which is a 100 h.p. unit.
12
Council Agenda - 11/27/89
In addition to changing the motor we imist change the starting system for the
motor, as it is sized for the 75 h.p. unit. Because of restrictions in the
power supply to wells 1 6 2 we must look at a motor that starts under partial
load or a motor that starts under soft load. By soft load I am referring to an
electronic type of reduced voltage start, taking upwards of 30 to 60 seconds to
reach full speed. I have obtained quotes from E.H. Renner 6 Sons for motor and
starter combinations and also from Olson Electric for similar type setups.
NSP, as well as Olson Electric, has recommended the 100 h.p. across the line
start motor coupled with an electronic or reduced voltage start. Based upon
the estimates, the package would cost us approximately $9,000. I am currently
doing further study as to the differences in the electronic start packages from
both vendors and the possibility of rebates from NSP for going to the high
efficiency motors. I will have recoimnendat ions for the Council at Monday
evening's meeting as to which vendor we should purchase the equipment from.
The next phase of our water improvements involves calculations and estimates
for design recommendations for well #2 and the four booster station pumps. We
are currently working with 031 on their recommendations. It is conceivable
that the 75 h.p, motor and starters removed from well el could be used in the
refurbishment of well 02. It is too early at this time, however, to affirm
that scenario.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Authorize the purchase and installation of 100 h.p. across the line start
motor, using an electronic soft start or reduced voltage starter at an
estimated cost of approximately $9,000.
2. Use a part wind magnetic start 100 h.p. motor, with an estimated cost of
the starter and motor exceeding $9,000.
3. Divise some type of throttling system for the existing motor, either
through the installation of some type of manual contrul valve or some
electronically computerized control system for throttling.
C. STAPP RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director, Water Superintendent,
and City Engineer that the Council authorize the purchase of the IOU h.p.
across the line start motor with soft start capabilities, as outlined above in
alternative 11. Purther reconnendations will be made Monday evening.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the letter of recommendation from OSM. Copy of estimates from Renner
and Olson Electric.
13
•Recoimaendation of staff, total S 9,038.00
Less NSP Rebate - 700.00
s 8,338.00
C_
QUOTE SUMMARY
MOTOR
REPLACEMENT WELL $1
November 22, 1989
Olson Electric
E. H. Renner
1.
Across the Line Start
$ 4,973.00•
$ 4,995.00
100 HP high eff. motor
(qualify for NSP rebate)
2.
LS 2-12 Soft Start
S 2,752.00
$ 2,800.00
3.
MS 2-12 Soft Start, Power
$ 3,200.00•
N/A
Factor Adjuster
4.
Part Winding Start
$ 4,850.00
$ 5,234.00
100 HP high eff. motor
5.
Magnetic Starter
$ 2,250.00
$ 6,099.88
6.
Remove and replace motor
$ 100.00•
$ 400.00
7.
Electrical work
$ 475.00•
N/A
B.
Head Start if needed
N/A
$ 290.00•
•Recoimaendation of staff, total S 9,038.00
Less NSP Rebate - 700.00
s 8,338.00
C_
��Orr
Scheten
Assyo�dai�, Inc
2021 East Hennepin Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55413
\ 612.331-8660
FAX 331-3806
Engine s
Sunevom
Planners
August ll, 1989
City of Monticello
250 E. Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362
Attn: John Simola, Public Works Director
Re: Water System Upgrade Replacement Pump for Well No. 1
Dear John:
We have made computer runs of the Monticello Water Distribution System
model under numerous different demands and total system discharge heads.
Our conclusions and recommendations from the System Study are as follows:
Utilizing an American 3 Stage Line Shaft Turbin No. 12H150 pump and the
existing 75 -HP motor we can expect pumping rates of 1224 G.P.M. When the
new tower is full and 1473 G.P.M. with 10' of water in the tower and a
system demand of 2,700,000 gallon per day. Well No. 1 has the capacity
�- to supply these quantities of water.
It is my recommendation, that you purchase the American No. 12HISO or a
equal pump with the same efficiency characteristics. This will allow you
to utilize the existing City owned motor at this time and allow more
flexibility when sizing a pumping system for Well No. 2.
If you have any questions, please contact Me at any time.
Sincerely,
ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
b ASSOCIATES, INC.
Put •"
Dan Kling, P.
DK/cmw
08/89.68
cc: City Administrator
9
NLU-21-1"$? 12.19 FPOH TO 12?5"O.1 P.0'
Is A Runfler R sons WELL DRILLING FOR FOI)R GENERPONS
5588 ARVIS STREET NX/ELK RI ERA MN 5330/)612)427-6100
INCORPORATED
November 20, 1989
CITY OF MONTICELLO
250 B. Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362
ATTR. Mr. John Simola - Public Works Director
RE. well 41
8OBJECT. 100 BP Motor Quote
Dear Mr. Simola,
As requested per phone conversation this date, the following is
the coat to
replace the 75 HP motor with a 100 HP Motor.
I. ACROSS THE LINE START MOTOR
1. U.S. 100 HP, 230 Volt, 60 Cycle, 3 Phase, 1800 RPM V.H.S.,
Premium
efficient motor with Non Reverse Rachet.
$4,995.00
2. Electronic Motor Starter - 30 Second Acceleration
2,800.00
TOTAL COST FOR ACROSS THE LINE........................................87,195.00
II. PART WIND START MOTOR
1. U.S. 230 Volt, 60 Cycle, 3 Phase, V.H.S. Prem. efficient motor with Non
Reverse Rachet.
$5,234.00
2. Part Wind Magnetic Starter
6,099.88
TOTAL COST FOR PART WIND START.......................................$11,333.88
Ill. LABOR 6 MATERIAL REQUIRED
1. Headshaft
$ 290.00
2. Labor to Remove 6 Install Nev Motor
400.00
3. Labor For Electrical Work By Others
TOTAL COST FOR LABOR 6 MATERIAL ........................................$
690.00
Literature has boon mailed to you on the above motors and starters.
If you have any questions on the above, please call me at 427-6100.
Best Regards,
r
Terry Alja( Sales Engineer
S.B. RENNER 6 SONS, IAC.
LICENSE 071015
JA/ta
Al/L56
fi ?M1 Olson CG Coes <2�leclric. `)nc.
240 West Oakwood Drive - Box 686
Monticello, MN 55362
(612)295-2690
November 21, 1989
City of Monticello
250 E. Bdwy.
Monticello, MN 55362
Att'n: John Simola
Dear John:
I have again reviewed Well #1 new starter application for 100 hp motor.
I have contacted Bruce Zemke at Northern States Power Co. and it is the
opinion of both of us that the 100 hp cross - line starter will not be
satisfactory at this location for 100 hp at 240 volts.
I therefore recommend a reduced voltage micro processor based starter.
Below 1 have listed sane of the advantages of this equipment:
A) It has the ability to sense the motor and load conditions at
all times and automatically adjust to ideal operation parameter,
giving maximum savings and minimum equipment wear.
B) Provides motor "ramp" starting and stopping. This greatly lowers
demand, and provides check valve closing much smoother.
C) Extended motor life, because of the overall control of power
factor conditions and stabilizing maximum performance.
D) Internal built-in phase loss and low -voltage sensing.
E) This starter will fit in, the present enclosure, with sone
modifications to the cover.
E) The existing controls will be easily adaptable to this system.
Below, please see price breakdowns:
3,�oo.00ail
MS -2 100 hp microprocessor starter 33;-}58-9 G
(this price reflects cost, plus tax, shipping, etc.)
Removal of old starter and installation of new starter, rebuilding
enclosure door, unhooking old motor, and rehooking new motor,
checking and calibrating controller . . . . . . . . . . . $475.00
1 have enclosed some technical information on the controller for your
reference. If you have any questions, please feel free to call.
Sincerely,I \)
W4 �L
I:aalcy J. Oleo^, p:ojcct manager
OLSON & SONS ELECMIC, INC.
Enclosures
Olso�i c� ��wis 6leclric. �ar,.
240 West Oakwood Drive - Box 686
Monticello, MN 55362
(612) 295-2690
November 22, 1989
City of Monticello
250 E. Bdwy.
Monticello MN 55362
Att'n: John Simola
RE: Well #1--100 hp motor
Dear John:
We have surveyed the above referenced project and are pleased to submit our quote
as follows:
I. ACROSS THE LINE START MOTOR
A. 1. U.S. 100 hp, 230 volt, 60 cycle, 3-phase, 1800 rpm, V.H.S.,
high -efficiency motor with non -reverse rachet . . $4,210.00
2. U.S. 100 hp, same specs as above, except 92.5% efficiency,
freight included . . . . . . . . . .$3,517.00
3. C.E. 100 hp, same specs as above, except 94.7% efficiency,
racing should be good for NSP rebate program .$4,973.00
Note: $4,973.00 (cost) - 700.00 (rebate) _ $4,273.00 (actual cost)
B. 1. Electronic motor starter IlLC2-12 . . . . . . . . . . . . .$2,531.00
2. Electronic motor starter OLS2-12 . . . . . . . . . . . . .$2,752.00
3. Electronic motor starter #MS2-12 . . . . . . . . . . . . .$3,200.00
II. PART WINDING START MOTOR
A. U.S. 100 hp, 230 volt, 60 cycle, 3-phase, 1800 rpm, V.H.S.,
high -efficiency motor, 94% with non -reverse rachet . . . . . .$4,850.00
B. Part winding magnetic starter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,125.00
Add for installation extras . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $125.00
III. LABOR & MATERIAL REQUIRED
A. Labor to remove and install new motor, no wiring
Labor to install . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$100.00
This quote is basically for materials only, except for installation of motor.
We hope this proposal meets with your approval and that we may be of service to you.
Sincerely,u'(:4�
i Warren D. Olson
OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC, INC.
H
MS2
Series
!MOTORTRONICS; INC.
, LGgie'r.''
• Microprocessor Based
e Energy Saver
X -COU Rump
Kicroprocessor Based The Model M32 Reduced
Voltage Starter brings a now dimension to solid-state
motor control. Its ability to sow motor and load condi•
tions of all times and automatically adlud to ideal operas-
lop parameters has set a now standard lot solid-state reduced
voltage darters.
Energy Saler This "self-adjusting" feature maximizes motor power factor and
energy savings by cositinually changing the current and voltage applied to the
motor to match changing load requirements. W%Ojrou other Power factor otm-
iTale are designed to operate an &1zed", manually Wooed curve, the M82 is
dealgried to s.tomaticay Opilmlas the power to the load using the low" our•
tent level possible. This reduces motor heating and saves energy to many
applications.
X-CellRamp This state-of-the-art design provides the period maw tamp. By
monitoring both motor and Load conditions during dad -up, the bw automatic-
ally adjusts the output voltage and current to Provide a very stable and lesser
power tamp. Our customers have compared It to the Accelaranon 01 a lot
engine; smooth and stable ... far exceeding the typical performance of other
voltage end current recap oontrols.
Design Benefits Typical APPHOU_ Ons
Bares KnorgyConveyors'
Reduce@ larush Correct GLadsL1UI=r,'
Kdands Drive Train Lde 01111"Is
ricto, Machine Twill
improvise Power
Roduoss Uschard"I stross Cram" and louts S.,
Reduces Motor Hes"1141 Yam and Pumps
is Reducew Dowatleas Compressors
31
Energy Saver/Power Factor Control
The microprocessor controlled energy savings circuit Motor life will be extended because of the lower opes-
continually monitors load/voltage conditions and sting currents and temperatures. Another benefit is the
matches motor performance to the load. Voltage is reduced need for power correction Capacitors. U
reduced to maintain energy savings at the lowest cur-
rent level. This results in an improved power factor and
energy savings when the motors load is below 50%, or t c4
when the lin6:{Cltag• ewoeeds the rated motor voltage.
c p..
X -Cell Ramp Provides Smooth Acceleration
The mlcreproce sor brings new state-cl-tbe-art per.
formance to soft start (reducpd voltage) startirq. Con-
Unuous monitoring Cl the motors operating puamsters
provides a Unseat power ramp not available on conven-
tional analog AC motor controls. This very smooth
power ramp eliminates motor jerking with heavy loads.
A user selectable current -limit ramp also provides
smooth starting for tightly loaded motors.
This method of accelerating the load provides smooth,
@topless control which greatly reduces wear an power
transur ssion components and also prevents product
breakage and spillage. Soft -start acceleration reduces
motor inrush current up to 70% which eliminates light
dimming, power disturbances and voltage transients
within the electrical dies 7tion system
T w ,
(%� 700- aarow 1� LW . •, ` . .
loo.
sea sue , - .. .
` 10 io iD 40
sew• is --d.)
7brgue vs. 77ine for Solt -Start and
Acrasa-tbe•Ltne Storting
Motor Protection
• Thermal Overload Relay
Adjustable 630%
• Shorted SCR Detection
Prevents starting of the motor if SCR is aborted.
Additional Features
• No Ad)ustments
State-of-the-art microprocessor control pro-
video continuous monitoring of the motors
parameters to achieve "amart" control. The
unit automatically adfusts to response to
changes in mator/load/voltage conditions to
maintain ma*Imum energy savings with the
optimum power factor.
ZZ I .-Aamwfol taw
sow IOD
(xt 8.8 @tie
D l
io m io w
Ttaw 19•••adw
Power vs• nme for Soft -Start and
Across-fbo-line Starting
ISO
. �A•mr U" `
Xpn 100-
sinia �� � I1astWn
0
t io io io
Speed vs. 71me for Solt -Start and
Across-the•Lfns Starting
w
• Phase Lasa Detection
Automatically shuts down motor d a phaes is
1061.
• LED Status Display
Monitors system status and provides operator
with visual Indications of Run, Now On,
Fault. and Stall conditions.
• Voltage Transient Protection
An RC snubber network bypaeses lrandent
voltage changes.
• Noise Immunity
Field proven ta long term applications.
Table A. Dimensions for Open Frame and NEMA Enclosed Models
open P.om.
Ron.
earJonee•
Ham
Po.r
Ha
H/114A
410/41'
L..(( y .• ..
; 7 � •}; :p H
VAC
t VACS L W R
210111611411
I
+a1; 'pQ, y 75 • :1 U
wt ..'IrS.j..Ts
r!
"C
VAC
a 30 b 80
W b 125 Z 20 : : t, : 0.0••"
I 3 to 2!
r 75 to 200
IM to 4W Y .:: g.-33
I
1250 to 350
SW to 7t10' .5f + . • 33 T 114.
I 50 to 00
on start up
Control Circuit
I 5o to 100
..
129 w
See Table A
�
+ NIA
•tor .p.et.l mi— a dw Lbd, masuh I.aon.
Phase unbalance
ttC,A
20D
earJonee•
Ham
'Typ. Q
Ha
type It
MW573
VAC
L..(( y .• ..
; 7 � •}; :p H
5 to 50
15
SIU t' U: ll g
77 .15 u
T
100 to 125
+a1; 'pQ, y 75 • :1 U
150 to 200!
n
yQ; ', iii it • ;b7 l0
250 to ,OD
]{Z ZM� S1 ; _ Co1Pd PawwT
®00 to 700
(0.' reabq
is VIE
v Type of Load
AC Supply Voltage
lip Ratings
Pourer Circuit
Conbgutahon
SCR HIV listing
Dlagnostle lna:., w a
Run (green LLD)
St
"n (yellow 6[D)
SteS (WIM LLD)
Fell (rd LID)
ON (green ISD)
AusRlsy Caelecls
Perm C Contacts
Control Adjuaseate
Torque
Power Ramp
Current (Jell Rasp
Aecelueum Time
Mounted an PC board.
Three phase, AC
induction motor
205, 240, 350,415,450,
579 V•o ( r lo;i),
Sa'60 Ha
5 to 700 HP
(Contact factory for clings
above 700 HP)
Su SCR
1200 V with 20040/
450 V Input
1500 V with 575 V Input
Motor or proper steed
Motor is reaping
Motor In w11 condition
Phase low or short.d SCR
Line parer present
Operates win away ruches
full speed
20 to 70% (7 settings)
5•lectable
Selectable
5 to 30 eecods (7 settlegs)
ONIOPP
Overloud Capacity
Continuous
1169E
One Minute
,009E
Thirty eeaontla
450%
Ten Seconds
SW%
Phase Insensitive
Operates with any phase
relation
Power Connections
Compression lugs
Protective reatusee
Phase lase protection
on start up
Shooed SCA detection
on start up
Control Circuit
Three-wln starVdop
control circuit
Dimensions
See Table A
Motor Overload Protection
Phase lou
Phase unbalance
Adjustable "nal overload
relay
Ambient oampensated
He H•rtare required
Derating Ceeafelratloos
Ambient Temprosturs
"bows 50rC
High Ieertlal lade
Laeerlve logglag duty
Ambient Temperature
top.r"tbg
- 20•C to WC at std
curtset
Storage
- 35•C U 55-C
9
s
vi.uv■n
Optional (natures are Identified lyy lettere and must be ordered as separate line items.
T41blo B. Model Selection Guide
.Ron"
new an" in bond ca M lad d • typed
1.16 eWA- 1scim sad. whese.et peNMe• cherh eL
.sectsere plea hr the full law aurreer rine to M
— 4 Is is Ib ooeec•1 F.W.
1
Consult fao-y Iw .1h.. opit—
6
19
1
MLS2.20006a
I
1028
2
YM.20010.11
7
11
42
3
M82.2DO15.6
3
2D
54
3
M82.71412a1
3
29
as
3
ML2.200251
4
30IA
4
!d2•IOD30I
20D VAC
40
Joe
4
MS2.2001D•N
208 VAC
6D
125
5
MM-20M•N
5
p
163
9
bw-21MH
8
7B
180
5
1LS2-MIS."
5
too
210
B
M32.201"
8
In
323
a
M32MMN
8
too
2m
6
M32Z0IMN
6
20D
GAD
6
M.9bININ"
7
e
le
1
'M52.24006.1
7
— 10
x
2
640
•
15
47
3M522Q)M
IXW-WIO-g
0
70
M
2
='407G6
1M52.3=
b
its
3
Mffi•31e7}6
1
30
10
4
M52.24=11
= VAC
40
1.
4
M97.24016N
3W VAC
00
in
5
M82-24MN
2
00
153
5
M52.2401113411
3
7e
1.0
6
NS2.24076N
3
—1OD
125
310
Ul
6
8
MUM
I bm "12w
3
180
3eD
a
M52 241WO
4
200
49D
•
1463.24200.11
4
Ma7.5'7776i
100
100
4
M67 -87100.N
1
102411=4
wwAc
to
u
1
td24eo10.6
48D VAC
is
21
3
VAN 480159
0
20
27
3
M93 Omit
0
i
e4
2
ILS:4SM9
.Ron"
new an" in bond ca M lad d • typed
1.16 eWA- 1scim sad. whese.et peNMe• cherh eL
.sectsere plea hr the full law aurreer rine to M
— 4 Is is Ib ooeec•1 F.W.
1
Consult fao-y Iw .1h.. opit—
Distributed By
U
U
MOTORTRONI CS, INC. U
414111110 r.— 0—h. f7.s..rer. ![ I/M nos. !0111 0" J411 - P- /4117 an 100
wpaeas —
S.i!!
30
40
7
M52 -41D301
40
92
3
MS2-240401
90
as
3
M32.460601
60
77
4
M52,eeoeo4
75
99
a
I.M411075-1
loo
170
4
MS248100.N
440 VAC
129
190
5
b= 411126N
401D VAC
190
leo
8
M92.4115M
(o -rd)
200
240
5
M97-48ZO0N
7911
300
8
MU48MO
300
no
8
MSLfgOyN
400
480
6
MW -49 aN
Soo
800
7
MS2.41MM
600
720
7
uaf4�N
700
640
•
MS346MN
5
61
0
M92.970*f
7.9
TA
1M52.3=
4
10
11
1
MW SM101
19
17
7
ML2•o70161
20
22
2
MSL57 &
29
77
2
M92•S7o262L1
30
32
3
MSM7ME
40
41
3
M32.670101
em VAC
w
82
3
MS34=1
919 VAC
t1D
e1
4
M32.97oe01
?5
M
4
Ma7.5'7776i
100
100
4
M67 -87100.N
IJW
IID
a
M52d719aN
200
200
a
M624=11.11
700
290
0
110132.97230.N
300
700
0
M529730M
400
400
•
62A7
M40aN
Six) --600
7
M624710D.N
•00
•00
9
h1=147111)"--700
700
•
Jim "MN
Distributed By
U
U
MOTORTRONI CS, INC. U
414111110 r.— 0—h. f7.s..rer. ![ I/M nos. !0111 0" J411 - P- /4117 an 100
wpaeas —
Council Agenda - 11/27/89
10. Consideration of amendments to snow plowing/removal policy and adoption of
revised snow plowing and removal plan. (J.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
With the addition of the MN -DOT agreement requiring the City to maintain a
portion of the sidewalk along Highway 25 at the I-94 right of way and our new
sidewalk ordinance changing the time constraints for removal of snow and ice
from sidewalks, it became necessary to amend the City's snow plowing/snow
removal policy.
At the same time it became apparent that our snow removal plan needed
updating. The growth of the City as well as faster and more efficient methods
of snow removal required us to update our plan. Copies of the amended policy
and the plan are enclosed for your review.
Some of the changes that you will note in the plan are timetables for
completion of snow plowing activities under normal conditions. Also, the
sanding requirements have broadened to include the entire community. In
addition, new areas as well as equipment changes have been included.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Approve amendments 4,5 pertaining to sidewalks to the snow plowing and
removal policy. In addition, this would include the adoption of the
A amended snow plowing/removal plan.
l 2. Approve the snow plowing/removal policy amendments 4,5 and to modify or
change the plan as requested by the City Council.
3. Make additional amendments to the snow plowing/removal polity and also
modify the plan as directed by Council.
C. STAFF REDOMENDATIONS:
It is the recommendation of the Public works Director and Street Superintendent
that the Council approve the amendments 4,5 to the snow plowing/removal policy
and approve the plan as presented. Since this is a significant update the
staff plane to review the policy at the end of the current snow season and
possibly ask the Council to make additional changes at that time.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the snow plowing/removal policy and snow plowing/removal plan.
14
C
SNOW PLOWING/REMOVAL POLICY
GENERAL
Purpose
The purpose of this policy is to establish uniform and consistent guidelines
for the plowing and removal of snow within the city of Monticello.
Areas of Responsibility
Through its adoption, the City Council of Monticello is responsible for the
policy established herein. Implementation of this policy is the responsibility
of the Street Supervisor in conjunction with the Public Works Director and City
Administrator. The chain of commnand is the City Administrator, Public Works
Director, and Street Supervisor, in that order. All decisions as to time,
method, and materials used on snow plowing/removal operations will be made by
the Street Supervisor, Public Works Director, and City Administrator and any
amendments are to be in accordance with the amendment section of this policy.
Amendments to Policy
Any amendments to this policy require Council approval. Whenever possible and
practical, amendments should be brought up at Council meetings and should be a
mnatter of public record. However, to allow for emergencies or other
extenuating circumstances, when time does not permit Council approval or
action, the Public Works Director is hereby authorized to amend any portion of
this policy he sees fit. If practical, the City Administrator shall be
notified and shall approve of any such amendment. Any such amendment wade due
to a particular emergency shall be brought to the attention of the Council if
the amendment is to be a permanent one.
Work Schedule
Scheduling of employees is the responsibility of the Street Supervisor under
the jurisdiction of the Public Works Director. Overtime should be kept at a
minimumn, with all overtime scheduling being approved by the Public Works
Director. The Public Works Director shall notify the City Administrator of any
unusual amount of overtime to be performed and the reasons.
Snow Plowing/Remnoval Schedule
Upon accumulation of snowfall, the Street Supervisor will arrange for the
street department emmployees to initiate snow plowing procedures
(11-10-75, I1). Doergency routes (County Road 75, from West River Street to
East County Road 39, including Hart Boulevard past the Hospital and State
Highway 25.) will be plowed first and then Third Street (to provide access to
all three schools).
•State Highway 25 is the responsibility of MN/ROTI City is to remove snow only
when authorized.
0
Snow Plowing/Removal Policy
Page 2
The Street Supervisor will then coordinate plowing of downtown area: east -west,
north -south streets within city proper, outlying areas, and parking lots. Top
priority will be given to the actual plowing operations before snow removal.
Snow removal will most likely occur the following day or evening.
POLICY ON SPECIFIC AREAS
Streets
All streets within the city limits of Monticello are to be maintained by the
City except those portions of County State Aid Roads and Stare Highway 25 which
are not covered by reimbursement agreements, I-94 and those streets that have
not been accepted by the City.
Downtown Area
For purposes of this provision of the snow plowing/removal policy, the downtown
area is defined as Broadway Avenue from Linn Street to Palm Street and on Pine
Street from 4th Street to River Street.• In the downtown area, snow removal
operations will take place as soon as possible after all snow plowing has been
done, usually the following evening. Snow will be removed only on the above
streets within the downtown area, the two funeral homes, Monti Coin Laundry,
Trinity Lutheran Church, (11-24-75, 42); all other streets will be plowed
only. (13, 11-24-75) Walnut Street, Broadway south to alley.
Alleyways
The three alleyways in Blocks 34, 35, and 52 shall be maintained by the City.
This does not include areas adjacent to the alleyways behind buildings and
stores which are the responsibility of the property owner.
Sidewalks
All sidewalks, except the Sidewalk Iirtprovement Project of 1975, and the
Highway 25 aidewalka at the I-94 right-of-way (+4, 11-27-89), shall be
maintained by the adjacent property owner. The Sidewalk Improvement Project of
1975, east on Broadway from Lot 12, Block D, to Washington Street and west on
Broadway from Lot 10, Block 37, up to, but not including, the Pinewood School
property, shall be maintained by the City. Included is that portion in front
of the old Senior Citizens Center, the Fire Station, and the sidewalk along the
west side of the parking lot at Third and Walnut, and the sidewalk on the west
aide of walnut Street lot. The I-94 right-of-way along Highway 25 sidewalk
shall be maintained by the City as per a MN/DOT agreement.
•AS authorized by MN/DOT.
C
Snow Plowing/Removal Policy
Page 3
Time of removal, ice and snow: The owner or occupant of every building or
tract of land within the City fronting upon any street, having a sidewalk
abutting upon such premises shall clear such sidewalk opposite said building or
tract of land of snow and ice within twenty-four (24) hours following the
termination of any snowstorm or the formation of ice from any cause and shall
keep the same clear and free from snow and ice. If such snow and ice is not
removed by the owner or occupant within the time specified herein, the same
shall be removed under the direction of the Director of Public Works and the
expense of such removal shall be levied against the property owner as a special
assessment and collected as in the case of other special assessments.
Parking Lots
All city parking lots shall be cleaned of snow and ice as soon as possible
after a snowfall. The timing of snow plowing/removal of parking lots and their
priority will be dependent upon existing conditions.
SNOW PLOWING AND ON -STREET PARKING NOTICE
CITY OF MONTICELLO
1. Normal plowing operations will occur during the night (10:00 p.m. to
8:00 a.m.) with top priority given to the emergency routes of State
Highway 25, Broadway Avenue to the Hospital and Third Street. Snow
removal from parking lots and the downtown areas will normally occur the
following night (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.)
2. All streets will be cleared of motor vehicles after a snow fall.
ADDITIONALLY, CITY ORDINANCE PROHIBITS PARKING ON CITY STREETS BETWEEN
THE HOURS OF 2:00 A.M. TO 6:00 A.M. REGARDLESS OF WEATHER CONDITIONS.
3. At no time shall the City clear private property or boulevards of snow
and ice.
4. Providing access to and maintaining mail boxes will be the sole
responsibility of the property owner.
Private Property
At no time, unless specifically mentioned in this policy or emergency
situations, shall the City clear private (residential or coimaercial) property
or boulevards of snow or ice.
0
SNOW PLOWING AND REMOVAL PLAN
PURPOSE
The purpose of this plan is to set down areas of responsibility and
describe how each area will be cleared in a snow plowing situation. The
following plan and schedule is based upon an average snowfall of six
inches (6"). Generally, snow plowing operations will not begin unless
snow accumulations of two (2) or more inches are received in the
Monticello area. It should also be noted that various conditions can
arise which will need special consideration. This plan and the following
schedule are to be used only as a general guideline and management tool.
The Street Supervisor, under the jurisdiction and general supervision of
the Public Works Director, shall initiate all full scale plowing and snow
removal activities. It shall be his responsibility to post daily weather
bulletins from November 15 through April 15, and he shall be info rind of
manpower and equipment availability at any given time during these
months.
II. PROCEDURE - PLOWING
Normal plowing will begin at 10:00 p.m. and be complete by 8:00 a.m. The
City will be divided into five plow routes. Each route will be assigned
men and equipment as follows:
Route p vehicle A b Operator
1. CAT Grader #20, Roger Mack
2. 185 Int. Truck 13, Richard Cline
3. 188 Ford Truck 12, Tom Moores
4. 178 Int. Truck +11, Reith Trippe
5. 181 Chev. Truck #41, Al Gapinski
(See city map for routes)
vehicle A9 (Ford 1 ton) will be used as a backup in case of equipment
breakdown. The other three City eirployees, John Simola, Matt Theisen,
and Tony Strande, will be called in as backup operations if the need
arises.
III. SANDING
At the present time, all four large plow trucks are equipped with
sanders. All trucks will sand intersections, hills, and curves on the
route they are assigned to. Rich Cline in vehicle 13 will sand the area
assigned to the grader.
Normally, sanding will commence after coupletion of all plowing.
operators will be expected to apply enough and and salt mixture to
facilitate melting of the desired area the first time around. When
weather conditions are beyond the range of sand and salt, small amounts
of calcium chloride will be added to trouble spots. When conditions
warrant sanding only, every effort shall be made to accoupliah this by
6:00 a.m. using two trucks when necessary.
\V
I
Snow Plowing s Removal Plan
Page 2
IV. PARKING LOTS
We presently have 12 areas (see map) that can be considered as parking
lots. They are: Lot #1, Lot #2, Lot #3, Lot 14, the Liquor Store lot,
the City Hall lot, the Fire Hall lots, the Senior Citizens Center lot,
the North Walnut Street parking, and the commuter parking lot. Parking
lots will normally be plowed last.
Lot #1 (Zoo) - Will be plowed by a truck - The snow from this lot will
normally be pushed to the south and then piled by the old Fire Hall.
Lot #2 (AV Room) - Will be plowed by Truck #3 - The snow from this lot
will be pushed to the south and piled n Me center around the island.
Lot #3 (Flickers) - Will be plowed by Truck #3 - The snow from this lot
will be pushed to the center and piled. No snow shall be pushed east of
the parking lot at any time.
Lot #4 (Walnut/River Street) - Will be plowed by a truck - The snow from
this lot will be plowed to the west and be piled in the northwest corner
of the lot.
The Liquor Store lot will be plowed by Truck #2 - In front of the store,
the snow will be pushed to the east an pdi 0 7n the southeast corner.
In the back of the store, the snow will just be plowed to the west.
The City Hall lot will be cleared either with the loader or with the
1 ton 4x4. All the snow will be pi%a to the soutE—a-Miwest.
The Old Fire Hall lot will be cleared by the loader and truck, with the
snow from the back lot being piled in the southeast corner. The snow
from the front will be pushed to the south and piled just off the
driveway.
The Senior Citizens Center lot will be plowed with a truck and the snow
shall be pushed to the east and piled on the boulevard.
The Walnut Street lot will be plowed with the loader or truck, and the
snow will be piled in the northwest corner of the lot.
The Library Parking lot is plowed with a truck, the snow is pushed east
and South.
The New Fire Hall lot will be cleared with Truck #2 or 1 ton 4x4. The
snow is pushed west.
The Coimmiter Parking lot will be cleared with Truck #2 starting by
4:00 a.m. Snow is pushed all directions.
0
Snow Plowing 6 Removal Plan
Page 3
V. ALLEYS
Three alleys are maintained by City personnel, and they are:
Bordering Parking Lot $3
Bordering Parking Lots 91 5 #2
Behind Maxwell Realty and Johnson's Department Store.
All three alleys will be be cleared of snow with the loader.
The snow from the first alley will be pushed to the west and piled in the
parking lot with the snow from that lot.
The second alley will be plowed from Highway 25 east to the second putap
house, then piled in the southwest corner of the parking lot. Prom Cedar
Street to the puup house will also be piled in the parking lot.
The third alley will be cleared from Highway 25 west to Walnut Street,
then piled in the northwest corner of the parking lot. A current
agreement with Johnsons has theta contract plowing 3/4 of the alley and
the staall lot, and the City hauls the snow from the sinall lot where it is
deposited by the contractor.
The loader will be operated by those individuals available.
VI. SIDEWALKS
All City maintained sidewalks shall be cleared with a tractor blower.
Sidewalks shall be cleared within 24 hours following a snowfall. Keith
Trippe will be the primary individual assigned to snow blowing duty. An
exception would be the I-94 sidewalk. This, on occasion, could depend on
MN/DOT's schedule.
VII. SNOW REMOVAL
Snow removal will normally be carried out the evening after a snowfall,
Broadway will be cleared first followed by the parking lots. If
conditions are such that snow cannot be removed in 48 hours, the Public
Works Director may consider contracting assistance with hauling and/or
loading.
VIII. EouIPMEN^ AND MAINTENANCe
Pre -plowing checks of equipment will be trade by each operator and shall
include the following: Check oil, wipers, washer solvent, power
steering, fluid, fuel, tires, lights, flash light, chain, and shovel.
C
Snow Plowing b Removal Plan
Page 4
Post -plowing maintenance will also be performed by the operator and shall
include the following: Fill fuel tanks, empty spreader, check cutting
edger for wear and loose bolts, make note of any service required on
vehicle. Any vehicle deemed unsafe shall be red tagged until repairs can
be made.
IX. MISCELLANEOUS
As an added help, the Street Superintendent will post a weather report
daily and a weekend forecast on Friday to give the crew a better idea of
what is expected as far as snow or bad weather. Each man will be
expected to read this before leaving home, and informing the Street
Superintendent if he plans on leaving house if the forecast calls for
snow.
0
GENERAL FUND AMOUNT
CASH DISBURSEMENTS --- NOVEMBER --- 1989
MN. Dept. of Natural Resources - Watercraft, Snowmobile b ATV, reg.
106.00
Preusse Cleaning - Cleaning contract - Carpeir at Fire Hall
190.00
Taylor Land Surveyors, Inc. - Surveying Fees - Water Tower
472.50
Henning b Associates - Professional Services - "-^=_ Tamer
3,117.08
Holmes b Graven - Professional Services - Economic Development
152.80
NuTech Environmental Corp. - Supplies - WWTP
1,181.08
Pace Laboratories - Testing Fees - Water Dept.
30.00
Nelson 011 Co. - Gas - Fire Dept..
66.15
Wang Laboratories, Inc. - Maintenance Contract - Computers
1,320.00
Gruys, Johnson, b Associates - Computer charges for October
290.00
Business Development Service, Inc. - Professional Services - HRA
1,535.42
Quality Lawn b Maintenance Co. - Landscaping - City Hall b Library
602.20
MN. Public Employer Labor Relations Assoc. - Membership dues
85.00
Gary Anderson - Mileage expense b Insurance reimbursement
215.74
Quality Pet Products - Supplies - Animal Control
113.50
I.C.M.A. Retirement Corp. - Payroll deductions
568.88
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll deductions
70.04
Wright County Human Services - Payroll deductions
150.46
Management Topics Workshop - Reg. Fees - J. Simola
140.00
Monticello Chamber of Commerce - Expo 89 Reg. Fee
100.00
Olson b Sons Electric, Inc. - Professional Services
1,185.03
Channel Construction Co. - Payment O1 - Meadows -Second Addition
9,582.10
Wright County Highway Dept. - 50 County Maps
50.00
CLicker's T.V. b Appliance - Dehumidifier - Water Tower
239.00
Z. H. Renner b Sons - Deep well turbine b pressure snubbers
7,493.16
Wright County State Bank - FICA, Federal & Medicare W/H
5,211.11
PERA - Payroll. dediictions
1,621.34
Henning b Associates - Professional Services - Water Tower
379.80
Gerald Clement - Recycling prize
50.00
Commissioner of Revenue - State W/H for September
1,669.09
MN. Dept. of Natural Resources - Watercraft, snowmobile b ATV. Reg.
262.00
University of Minnesota - Rog. Fee - Seminar - K. Doty
95.00
Commissioner of Revenue - Water Sales Tax for 3rd. quarter
545.49
Dahlgren, Shardlow b Uban - Profossionnl Services
1.266.92
Elk River Veterinary Clinic - Animal Control Services
13.50
Simplex - Maintenance Agreement - Clock
129.25
Horton Sand 6 Gravel Co. - Gravel, etc.
1,411.00
Braun Engineering - Professional Services
178.25
Municipal Computer Systems (landbook - Subscription - J. O'Neill
32.95
Corrow Sanitation - Garbage Contrnr.t Payment - October
12,046.67
Preusse Cleaning Service - Cleaning contract - City Hall b Fire Hall
450.00
Y.M.C.A. of Mpls. - Monthly contract payment
625.00
Patty Salzwedel - Animal control contract b Adoptions
521.00
Jerry Hermes - Janitorial services at Library
227.50
NorthStar Waterworks Products - Gauges, supplies, etc.
9,154.09
Adopt -A -Pat - Animal Control Services
280.00
If b If Watertower, Inc. - Recanting old Water Tower
9,200.00
Peggy Stoncol - Assessor Salary - Sept. b Oct.
1,750.00
ifd
-fir's Gordon Conger - Roplocoment Trees
4,500.00
Arrow Star - Freight Duo on Fire Cabinet
153.50
Paco Laboratories - Professional Services - Water Tower b Water Dept.
240.00
Foodrito Controls = Misc. supplies - Water Dept.
1,531.54
,
3
GENERAL FUND
ADIOUNT
CliECK
CASH DISBURSEMENTS -- NOVEMBER -- L989
D. L. Anderson 6 Assoc. - Supplies - City Hall
IL9.17
28752
Dept. of Natural Resources - Snowmobile 6 ATV. Reg.
152.00
28753
Professional Services Group, Inc. - Monthly WWTP Contract.
22,943.43
28754
Norwest Services - Computer Payment - November
2,407.61
28755
Minn U.C. Fund - Unemployment Benefitq
1,277.22
28756
Void
---
28757
I.C.M.A Retirement Trust - Payroll Deductions
568.88
28758
Rick Wolfsteller - Mileage Expense
300.00
28759
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll Deductions
70.04
28761)
Commissioner of Revenue - State W/H for October
1,701.16
28761
Public Employees Retirement Assoc. - Insurance premium
27.00'
28762
Pitney Bowes - Postage machine rental
208.25
28763
I.C.M.A. - Subscription - J. O'Neill
38.95
28764
Lake Country Chapter - Membership Dues - G. Anderson
15.00
28765
Northern States Power Co. - Utilities
7,202.71
28766
Midwest Gas - Utilities
636.33
28767
Polka Dot Recycling - Recycling charges
1,149.37
28768
Bridgewater Telephone Co.
1,215.97
28769
Fair's Garden Center - Misc. shrubs, trees -etc.
359.36
28770
U.S. Postmaster - Postage
500.00
28771
U.S. Postmaster - Postage - Sewer A Water Bills
263.57
28772
Public Employees Retirement Assoc. - Payroll Deductions
1,714.34
28773
Wright County State Bank - FICA, Federal A Medicare W/H
5,851.14
28774
Anoka County Social Services - Payroll Deductions
105.08
28775
Wright County Human Services - Payroll Deductions
75.23
2 6
State Treasurer - State Building Surcharge - 3rd quarter
692.64
2,, ,7
Caldwell Tank, Inc. - Payment 06 - 800,000 Callon Standpipe
54,790.90
28778
Dept. of Natural Resources - Snowmobile 6 ATV Reg.
146.00
28779
Dahlgren, Shardlow b Uban - Professional Services
59.50
28780
Simons, Allyn Marketing, Inc. - Professional Services - Bus Tranap.
270.66
28781
International Conference of Bldg. Officials - Membership Dues
20.00
28782
Action Plus - Temporary Services
748.83
28787
Purcell's Plumbery - Supplies '
33.38
28784
Buffalo Aviation - Cleaners - Street Dept.
44.83
28785
Hydrotax - Supplies - Street Dept.
244.80
2878f,
Student Plans, Inc. - insurance premium - Fire Dept.
542.64
28787
Jeff O'Neill - Travel Expense
127.50
2878r
Water Products Co. - Meters, etc. - Water Dept.
4.023.68
28789
Ken Maus - Misc. Expense Reimbursement
139.87
28790
Monticello Times - Legal Publications
1,376.10
28791
Marco Business Products - Typewriter ribbons 6 copy paper
154.96
28792
Teem Laboratories - Degreaser - Sewer Collections
695.28
28793
J M Oil Co. - Gas - Fire Dept.
29.60
28794
Maximum Security - Keya - Water Dept.
A2.95
2879r
Simonson Lumber Co. - Material i Supplies
547.51
2R79v
D B Industries, Inc. - Water Tower Expense
679.53
2879
Communication Auditors - Fire Dept. Paler Repairs
78.25
2879F
Adam's Pest Control - Pest control services - City Hall
50.00
28795
Gopher State One -Call, Inc. - Professional Services - Water Dept.
50.00
28801
Unocal - Gas
63.20
2Ha01
McDowall Co. - Repairs - City Hall, Fire Dept. i Library
758.58
Copy Duplicating Products - Copy machine maintenance - Library
40.20
28
Smith A Hayes - Le4el Fees
2,745.81
28804
GENERAL FUND AMOUNT
CHECK
CASH DISUBRSEMENTS --- NOVEMBER --- 1989
Pat Kovich - Mileage reimbursement
4.00
28805
Morrell Transfer - Freight Charges
81.93
28806
Unitog Rental Services - Uniform rental charges
135.19
28807
Omann Brothers - Sand, etc. - Street Dept.
27.37
28808
Moon Motors - Parts - Park Dept.
48.63
28809
Schillewaert Landscaping - Trees, Landscaping, etc. - Water Tower
15,438.65
28810
Cathy Shuman - Mileage Expense
53.00
28811
Gruys, Johnson 6 Assoc. - Computer Charges - November
290.00
28812
Wright County Treasurer/Auditor - Sheriff's Monthly contract payment
12,049.14
28813
Monticello Ford, Inc. - Repairs - Fire Dept.
356.87
28814
EPA - Supplies - Fire Dept.
258.36
28815
Century Lob - Ice Foe - Street Dept.
278.50
28816
Orr Schelen Mayeron 6 Assoc. - Engineering Fees
6,764.09
28817
Marcie's Farm Service - Twine - Park Dept.
6.95
28818
Dyna Systems - Supplies - Street Dept.
725.27
28819
Harry's Auto Supply - Parte 6 Supplies
211.96
28820
Northern Oxygen Service - Supplies - Fire Dept.
12.30
28821
Sentry Systems, Inc. - Fire Alarm Contract - Fire Dept.
126.00
28822
Monticello Printing - Office supplies b printing
203.75
28823
Monticello Office Products - Office supplies
504.79
28824
Coast to Coast - Supplies \
604.98
28825
Silver Fox Inn - Room charge - Chamber Meeting &Ash;P(Ao3:'✓�'
31.80
28826
Deter -man Welding 6 Tank Service, Inc. - Tank DiSposal - Old Ford Garal-,e
462.00
28827
Buffalo Bituminous - Paved Patching - Walnut St.
875.00
28828
ineral Rental - Rentals - Sign, scaffole, etc.
155.28
28829
..ational Bushing 6 Parts - Supplies b Parts
66.66
28830
Al b Julie Nelson - Subscription to newspaper
13.75
28831
Local /49 - Union dues
144.00
28832
National Automobile Dealers - Subscription - Deputy Registrar
39.00
28833
Daly, Bohling 6 O'Connor -Legal Fees
950.00
28834
Diane Jacobson - Travel expense - seminar
27.50
28835
Rick Wolfeteller - Conference expense b meetings
188.85
28836
Monticallo Firs Dept. - Firemen's Wages
1,817.64
28837
Patty Salzwadel - Animal control contract
473.00
28838
Jerry Hermes - Library cleaning contract
227'50
28839
P C Support Center - Rag. Fees - seminar -Schuman, 0"Neill, McGuire
465.00
28840
P C Support Center - Additional Reg. Fees
15.00
2884:
Principal Mutual Life Ina. - Insurance premium
7,467.44
28842
M. Dept. of Natural Resources - Snowmobile 6 ATV Reg.
294.00
28643
Jim Hatch Sales - Latern Battery - Street Dept.
25.68
28844
Little Falls Machine Co. - Parts - Snow/Ice Dept.
334.44
28845
Mobil - Gas
366.17
28846
Hoglund Transportation - Fara Box - Bus Transportation
495.00
28847
Mike Cyr - Professional Services - Lighting - Meadow Oak
140.00
28848
A T 6 T Info Systems - Fire Phone Charges
3.96
28849
L N R Services - New keys 6 locks - City Hall 6 Library
242.00
28850
State Treasurer Surplus - File Cabinets, trailer L valve
390.00
28851
Contra Sota - Sludge Disposal - WWTP
1,134.30
2885
'lic ker's T.V. i Appliance - Recording equipment - Council Chambers
2,567.45
28853
, Is
GENERAL FUND
AMOUNT
CHECK
CASH DISBURSEMENTS --- NOVEMBER --- 1989
Petty Cash - Petty Cash
55.77
288:4
• MN. State Fire Depart. Assnc. - Dues - Fire Depart.
90.00
28855
Lynette Carr - Recycling prize
50.00
28856
Robert Lagergren - Recycling prize
50.00
28857
011ie Koropchak - Travel Expense
16.00
28858
United States Salt, Inc. - Sand/Salt - Streets
1,518.69
28859
Floor Care Systems - Rug mate - City Hall & Fire Hall
304.81
28860
John Slmola - Travel Expense - Seminar
118.25
28861
Humane Society of Wright County - Animal Control expense
50.00
28862
Karl Kluenenberg - Staining trim at City Hall
45.00
28863
St. Cloud Appraisal - Appraisal Fees - F. Markling property
800.00
28864
Maus Foods - Supplies
339.51
28865
Holmes 6 Graven - Professional Services
1,023.10
28866
Yonak Landfill - Garbage services - Landfill charges
4,249.80
28867
Griefnov Sheet Metal - Repairs
28.00
28868
Grainger - Equipment - Fire Depart.
113.19
28869
Depart. of Trade & Economic Development - Reg. Fees - C. Koropchak
30.00
28870
Payroll for October
31,387.85
TOTAL CASH DISBURSEMENTS
298,604.27
`J
LIQUOR FUND
CASH DISBURSEMENTS -- NOVEMBER 1989
AMOUNT
CFECK
NO.
Larsen Carpet - New carpet 6 installation charges
5,300.00
14733
Quality Lawn 6 Maintenance Company - Landscaping
312.50
14734
Johnson Brothers Wholesale Liquor - Liquor
1,692.14
14735
Griggs, Cooper 6 Co. - Liquor
2,550.35
-
14736
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll deductions
250.00
14737
Wright County State Bank - FICA, Federal d Medicare W/H
569.87
14738
PERA - Payroll deductions
177.19
14739
Commissioner of Revenue - State W/H for September
233.59
14740
Ed Phillips 4 Sons Co. - Liquor
2,807.29
14741
Eagle Wine Co. - Wine
1,563.47
14742
Griggs. Cooper 6 Co. - Liquor
2,892.84
14743
Quality Wine d Spirits Co. - Liquor
1.619.17
14744
Johnson Brothers Wholesale Co. - Liquor
1,930.71
14745
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll deductions
250.00
14746
Commissioner of Revenue - State W/H for October
238.51
14747
PERA - Life insurance premium
9.00
14748
McDowall Company - Repairs
195.12
14749
Day Distributing Co. - Mise. supplies
431.30
14750
Griggs, Cooper d Co. - Liquor
6,995.78
14751
Dahlheimer Distributing Co. - Beer
20,718.55
14752
Olson 6 Sons Electric - Repairs
17.59
14753
Coast to Coast - Misc. supplies 6 outside paint
693.44
14754
TFS Floor Care Systems. Inc. - Floor supplies
9.89
14755
l ton's Ice Co. - Ice
223.45
14756
Gruya. Johnson b Associates, LTD
110,00
14757
Seven Up Bottling Co. - Pop
203.40
14758
Thorpe Distributing Co. - Beer, etc.
12,678.75
14759
Dick Beverage Co. - Beer, etc.
1,831.97
14760
Grosslein Beverage Co. - Beer, etc.
14,041.10
14761
Bernick's Pepsi Cola Co. - Pop
265.95
14762
Jude Candy 6 Tobacco Co. - Misc. supplies
619.53
14763
Monticello Times - Advertising
223.95
14764
Commissioner of Revenue - Sales Tax Due for October
7,571. 9
14765
Quality Wine 6 Spirits Co. - liquor
2,281.97
14766
Ed Phillips 6 Sons. Co. - Liquor
3,138.14
14767
Viking Coca -Coln Co. - Pop •
455.25
14768
Lfefert Trucking - Freight Charges
323.76
14769
Kolles Sanitation - Garbage services
181.70
14770
Johnson Brothers Wholesale Co. - Beer, etc.
3,504.77
14771
Midwest Cas Co. - Utilities
31.77
14772
Bridgewater Telephone Co. - Phone chargee
76. 55
14773
Northern States Power Co. - Utilities
664.49
14774
PERA - Payroll deductions
179.48
14775
Wright County State Bank - FICA. Federal 6 Medicare W/H
600.52
14776
Simonson Lumber Co. - Material for improvements on bldg.
99,25
11,777
Griggs. Cooper h Co. - Liquor
3,943.87
1477R
Eagle Wine Co. - Wine
1,275.14
14779
Johnson Brothers Wholesale Liquor Co. - Liquor
556.50
14780
I 'unlity Wine 6 Spirits Co. - Wine
2,259.17
14781
rincfpal Mutual Life Ins. Co. - Insurance premium
775.07
14782
LIQUOR MM
CASH DISBURSEMENTS -- NOVEMBER -- 1989 AHOUHT CyrrjR
J
Floor Care Systems - Rug Mats
166.22
14783
Ed Phillips 6 Sons Co. - Liquor
4,041.86
14784
Griggs, Cooper b Co. - Liquor
6,464.16
14785
Eagle Wine Co. - Wine
224.82
14786
Johnson Brothers Wholesale Liquor Co. - Liquor
3,227.38
14787
O'Hara Companies - Supplies
86.50
14788
St. Cloud Restaurant Supply Co. - Supplies
67.55
14789
City of Monticello - Sever d Water Bill
54.43
14790
Wright County State Bank - Deposit Books
11.35
14791
Maus Foods - Supplies
15.78
14792
Payroll for October
3,791.15
TOTAL CASH DISBURSEMENTS
127,726.69
J
:J