City Council Agenda Packet 02-11-1991AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Monday, February 11, 1991 - 7:00 p.m.
Mayor: Ken Maus
Council Members: Shirley Anderson, Brad Fyle, Clint Herbst, Dan
Blonigen
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held January 28,
1991.
3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints.
4. Consideration of proposal to utilize fire hall for community
organizations.
5. Consideration of a resolution adopting an ordinance amendment
establishing a Parks Commission.
6. Consideration of a resolution adopting an ordinance amendment
establishing regulations governing trapping activity.
7. Consideration of buying new brush and tree chipper for the
tree department.
8. Consideration of increasing the minimum recycling requirements
from six to nine materials per quarter.
9. Consideration of 1991 Junk Amnesty Day.
10. Consideration of purchase of micro -computer for use by
Economic Development Director.
11. Consideration of purchasing personal accident insurance
coverage for Council members.
12. Report on City Attorney selection process; consideration of
establishing date and time for interviews.
13. Adjournment.
l
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MOUTICELLQ CITY COUNCIL
Monday, January 28, 1991 - 7:00 p.m.
Members Present: Shirley Anderson, Dan Blonigen, Clint Herbst,
Brad Fyle
Members Absent: Ken Maus
Acting Mayor: Dan Blonigen
Approval of the minutes of the reqular meeting held
January 14, 1991.
After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle, seconded by
Clint Herbst, to approve the meeting minutes as written.
Motion carried unanimously.
Citizens comments/petitions, request and complaints.
Steve Hennen of Buffalo, Minnesota, informed Council that he
had been cited for violating the snowmobile ordinance while
snowmobiling through Monticello on his way to Big Lake. It
was his view that the potential $300 fine and misdemeanor
charge that he faced was not fair because there was no warning
that there was an ordinance in Monticello regulating
snowmobilors. He also noted that he was unable to drive in
the roadway because at that time the roads were bare;
therefore, he drove only on the boulevard area along side the
roadway.
Dan Blonigon noted that our ordinance does allow snowmobiles
to operate in the city with certain limitations. The City has
made an effort recently to control snowmobilers that have been
driving on private property and causing damage. Blonigen went
on to suggest that the first violation, if not resulting in
damago to property, could be mot with a warning rather than a
citation. Clint Herbst concurred that due to numerous
complaints, the City needed to crack down on problems with
snowmobilors; however, the City did not intend to atop people
from passing through town if they operate their snowmobile in
a manner consistent with the ordinance. Herbst suggested a
weak or two of warnings be given to violators prior to
Issuance of citations.
After discussion, it was the consensus of Council to send a
notice to the county to lessen the penalty from a misdemeanor
to a petty misdemeanor for all those snowmobile ordinance
violations ticketed prior to February 1, 1991, and direct
staff to install signs on the perimetor of the community
Indicating that the snowmobile ordinance is in effect within
the city limits of Monticello.
Page i
Council Minutes - 1/28/91
Wes Olson of the Monticello Jaycees came forward to present a
proposal to renovate the old fire hall for public use. Under
the proposal, the renovation plans would be approved by
Council with all work done and/or financed by the Jaycees.
The proposal also called for continued City control and
operation of the structure. Olson went on to note that -the
membership is strongly behind this concept. All the work that
would be done on the fire hall would be done professionally.
Shirley responded by saying that she had no objection to the
idea. It was her concern, however., that the Public works
Department might need the area for storage. John Simola
concurred that there is no extra room in other facilities to
store the materials now located in the fire hall. Shirley
Anderson suggested that the staff investigate the possibility
of working with the Jaycees on this concept.
It was the consensus of the Council to direct staff to review
the impact of the proposal and report back to Council.
4. Public hearinq on the adoption of assessment roll for Project
90-04 (Sandberq East improvement) and adoption of resolution
certifyinq assessment to county auditor.
Acting Mayor Blonigen opened the public hearing. Rick
Wolfsteller reviewed the history behind Project 90-04 and
outlined the proposed assessment roll. In his presentation,
he noted to Council that the City had earlier decided to pick
up 25% of the construction costs due to the fact that the
project was necessary for environmental reasons and because
there is a limited number of properties that can be assessed
because only property on one side of the improvement receive
a benefit. Assessing the full amount to those properties that
receive benefit might have resulted in an assessment amount
that exceeds value added to the assessed property by the
improvement. After his presentation, Dan Blonigen asked for
comments.
At this time, Jeff Nelson stated his objection to the
assessment. It was his view that the assessment total had not
been fairly distributed among affected property owners, and he
stated that the assessment amount exceeded the benefit of the
Improvement to his property.
John Sandberg made the argument that he should be granted the
same throe -year deferral or abatement of interest as awarded
other property owners affected by the assessment because he
did not petition for the improvement. Dan Blonigen rominded
Sandberg that he petitioned for annexation in 1986, and along
with this petition had to be the understanding that land
brought into the city would someday receive city services.
Pago 2
Council Minutes - 1/28/91
Rick Wolfsteller agreed with Sandberg that he did not petition
for the improvement; however, the City was threatened by
Sandberg with a lawsuit if we didn't extend services or grant
a permit for the construction of a dwelling utilizing the
private well and sanitation system.
Shirley Anderson suggested that comparing the Sandberg East
situation to the situation faced by the properties that will
be having deferred assessments is not a fair comparison and
does not apply.
Dan Blonigen then closed the public hearing. Clint Herbst
noted that the original concept for development in the area
called for development for two lots at a time with homes
constructed on one lot, the other lot reserved for future
subdivision at such time that utilities were extended to and
through the area. The Nelsons elected to build in the middle
of the two lots thereby limiting their potential for future
land sale to compensate them for added assessment cost. The
Nelsons made their choice when they set their house in the
middle of the lot; therefore, they should pay for the cost of
the improvement as proposed.
It was noted by the Nelsons that they were aware of the
restrictions on the lots and sought an exemption allowing them
to build in the middle, realizing that sewer and water
assessments would be larger because of their request.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson to
adopt the assessment roll with the exception of the Nelson
property, with this assessment to be determined at a later
date. Motion died for lack of a second.
A motion was made by Brad Fyle, seconded by Clint Herbst, t o
adopt the assessment roll as outlined in resolution 91-4 .
Motion was based on the conclusion that the assessments as
proposed based on front footage was a fair and equitable
method of assessing the cost against benefiting properties .
Voting in favor: Brad Fyle, Clint Herbst, Dan Blonigen .
Opposed: Shirley Anderson. SEE RESOLUTION 91-4.
Consideration of authorizing purchase of air compressor for,
fire department.
Representatives from the Monticello Fire Department ware
present to request the purchase of an air compressor for the
fire department. In his report, Wolfsteller noted that the
1991 budget cal led for a $7 , 500 purchase for a replacement ai r
compressor for filling tho breathing apparatus. The typo of
air compressor needed for the department has limited
suppliers, as this air compressor is different in that it
Page 3
(;D
Council Minutes - 1/28/91
operates under very high pressure and also purifies the air.
The model selected by the fire department would be a three -
stage, air-cooled compressor with 5,000 PSI capacity. The
department is also proposing to replace existing storage tanks
with two new 4,500 PSI storage tanks, with the total estimated
package at $8,334. Fire department officials noted that the
Joint Fire Board representatives attended the Township Board
meeting Wednesday to discuss the purchase. The Township was
in agreement with the purchase provided that the Joint Board
would meet to review the capital outlay budget for the fire
department in an effort to find areas that could be delayed
until future years.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson,
seconded by Brad Fyle, to purchase the air compressor and
breathing apparatus as requested under the condition that the
fire department delay or cancel purchases in an amount making
up for the budget overrun on this item. Motion carried
unanimously.
6. Consideration of requestinq proposals from consultants for
doinq a needs and facilities planninq study.
Rick Wolfsteller noted that as part of the 1991 budget, $7,500
is allocated for an architect/engineering firm to prepare a
facilities needs planning study concerning future
expansion/needs for City Hall and the Public works Department.
Wolfsteller requested Council authorization to contact three
or four consultants that have completed similar studies for
other communities. The intent would be to request the
consultants to present their proposals to the Council on what
they would study and the estimated cost to complete a planning
report. Wolfsteller went on to inform Council that he
believes the City will need an outside consultant to analyze
our present facilities, our anticipated needs, and establish
a plan for meeting our needs.
Dan Blonigen reviewed the list of items to be studied and
suggested that the staff and City Council are fully capable of
preparing a plan without the help of an outside consultant.
Rick Wolfstellor concurred that many of the items City staff
can handle; however, at the same time, an outside consultant
can provide a fresh perspective and have the capability and
background to provide solutions that staff may not envision.
Blonigen suggested that this item be tabled until the next
meeting.
After discussion, a motion was mado by Shirley Anderson,
seconded by Brad Fyle, to table this item until the next
meeting of the City Council. Motion carried unanimously.
Page 4
Council Minutes - 1/28/91
Consideration of an additional scanner for recyclinq program
John Simola noted that despite the potential lead to develop
an alternative met—hod for scanning the recycling bins, it was
his suggestion that the City go ahead and purchase the Telxon
scanner and spare SKI scanner in order to meet our short-term
needs .
Clint Herbst suggested that staff look into scanning
participation data from inventory sheets located inside the
vehicle compartment rather than scanning the participation
data directly off of the recycling bins. This would allow the
scanners to remain Inside the vehicle staying warm, thereby
improving performance.
John Simola concurred that this method for recording
participation in the recycling program could possibly allow us
to get around the problems created by cold weather scanning.
Simola went on to note that when the scanners do not work, it
makes a lot more work for Polka Dot Recycling. Each resident
that participates must be recorded by hand on a paper form.
After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle, seconded by
Shirley Anderson, to purchase one Telxon scanner in the amount
of $1,260. Motion carried unanimously.
Consideration of purchase of portable wire feed welder and
replacement of weldinq torch set.
John Simola requested that Council consider updating its
welding capabilities by adding a portable wire feed welder
with capabilities of welding light gauge steel in the shop, as
well as having the ability to move the welder to the field for
use on street structures and park equipment. Simola noted
that from time to time, there is a need to do welding on some
of the street light polos, as well as the strootscape railing
system. In addition, having a field portable weldor would
allow us to make repairs on park equipment, street signs, etc.
Simola wont on to state that this item is in the 1991 budget.
After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Pyle, seconded by
Shirley Anderson, to purchase a Miller wire food welder from
Contral-McGowan in the amount of $1, 599.61 and a Smith welding
torch in the amount of 5330.70. Motion carried unanimously.
Consideration of purchasing wastewater sampler for the sewer
collection dopartmont.
John Simola infor-mod Council that there is a need in the sewer
collection department for a wastewater sampler capable of
taking Individual. samples every hour during a 24-hour period.
There are throo basic uses for this piece of equipment:
Pago 5
Council Minutes - 1/28/91
The first is to monitor the industrial users to prepare
self-monitoring test results and to insure discharge
permit compliance.
Another use is to continue our search for commercial
and/or industrial discharges of copper and zinc. Levels
of these heavy metals found in the City's wastewater
sludge, although not near danger levels, are of
increasing concern.
3. There is a need to sample for sulfides and sulfates in
our wastewater system which result in hydrogen sulfide
gas releases and odor problems.
Council reviewed the problems associated with monitoring
wastewater.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson,
seconded by Clint Herbst, to purchase an ISCO Model 3700
Sampler from Tech Sales for a cost of $3,304. Motion carried
unanimously.
10. Consideration of settino a meetino to interview City Attornev
candidates.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill informed Council that the City
received 15 responses to the request for proposals form
distributed to various attorneys in December 1990. Responses
have been reviewed and rated in terms of cost, proximity, and
municipal law experience. O'Neill went on to describe the
municipal law categories that the City Attorney will be
assisting the City with which include: labor law, contract
administration, intergovernmental relations, planning and
zoning, annexation, real estate development, environmental
law, public finance, and code enforcement. Councilmember
Anderson noted her satisfaction with the process and suggested
that the City move ahead by selecting the top six candidates,
including Jim Agosto and Richard Clough, for a preliminary
interview.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson,
seconded by Clint Herbst, to appoint two Council members and
staff to a committee charged with conducting screening
interviews. Motion carried unanimously. Appointed to the
screening committee were Clint Herbst and Shirley Anderson,
along with City staff members O'Neill, Wolfstollor, and
Simola.
Page 6
C))
Council Minutes - 1/28/91
11. Consideration of authorizinq the purchase of a vehicle for the
building inspection department.
Rick Noifsteller reminded Council that at the previous meeting
Council authorized staff to obtain additional quotes for
compact pickups and/or used mini -vans in order to provide more
flexibility for City employee transportation use. Wolfsteller
reviewed the additional quotes obtained. Council discussed
the merits of buying a newer vehicle with an extended warranty
versus an older, less expensive vehicle that might be subject
to higher repair costs.
After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst, seconded
by Brad Fyle, to purchase a 1988 Dodge Caravan from Gould's
for $9,500 contingent on the availability of an extended
warranty on the engine and drive train. The purchase is made
with the understanding that the Building Inspector will be
required to have tAs own vehicle available in reserve while he
is on duty as CLty Building Inspector. Voting in favor:
Clint Herbst, Brad Fyle, Dan Blonigen. Opposed: Shirley
Anderson.
12. Consideration of the bills for the month of Januarv.
1 A motion was made by Shirley Anderson, seconded by Clint
1 Herbst, to approve the bills submitted. Motion carried
unanimously.
Jeff O'Neill
Assistant City Administrator
Pago I
Council Agenda - 2/11/91
Consideration of proposal to utilize fire hall for community
orqanizations. (R.W.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At the previous Council meeting, Wes Olson, representative of
the Monticello Jaycees, presented a proposal for Council
consideration on developing the fire hall building into a
community facility that could possibly include space for the
food shelf, Christian Social Service needs, and possibly a
community room. Wes was seeking input from the Council as to
whether the City would be receptive to turning over the
building for these types of uses before proceeding further
with developing plans and funding requirements.
Currently, the Monticello Food Shelf is occupying a portion of
the fire hall, with the balance of the facility being utilized
by the Public Works Department for vehicle storage and
equipment storage. The Monticello Jaycees operate a number of
pull -tab gambling licenses, and the organization may be
willing to funnel donations for the purpose of remodeling the
building to provide space for not only the food shelf but
possibly the Christian Social Services and developing a
community room that could be utilized by various
organizations. Presently, it is not the intent of the Jaycees
to purchase the building but merely spend funds to remodel it
for these organizations. Before the Jaycees proceed further
with investigating this possibility, they would like to
receive direction from the City Council as to whether the City
would be agreeable to donating this building for that purpose.
While the City has been attempting to sell the property for a
number of years, the building presently is suitable for
manufacturing or other uses that are not appropriate in a
commercial district. The cost of remodeling the building for
retail or office space has apparently deterred a number of
people from proceeding with making offers. The Jaycees fool
that this building is in a good location to continue with the
food shelf arrangement and also to find a new home for the
Christian Social Service Agency. It is the intent of the
Jaycees to involve other community organizations such as the
Lions Club, VFW, and Legion Club, otc., to help support the
remodeling cost; but before they proceed further, they would
like to receive support from the Council for their idea.
Although the typo of uses suggested by the Jaycees may be
appropriate, the Council has to determine whether it is the
City's function to supply a building for the food shelf and
Christian Social Services, which have been primarily supported
Council Agenda - 2/11/91
in the past by the area churches. In addition, it is proposed
that once the building would be remodeled, the Jaycees would
not be involved in the operation of the building, but it would
be the City's responsibility to manage the facility.
Apparently, the Jaycees cannot own the facility with gambling
proceeds, and that is why it would still be a City -owned
building. The City would still be responsible for insuring
the building, heat and light expenditures, and maintenance
thereafter, which would seem to indicate that the City should
at least, at a minimum, charge a minimal amount of rent to
cover these daily operating costs. If the building would be
converted for these purposes, the City will be faced with
building a replacement structure to house the equipment and
vehicles that are now being stored in the fire hall. The
Public Works Department is currently doing an analysis of
their facilities needs, which will include the equipment
currently stored at the fire hall; but the City would not be
able to count on any proceeds from selling the fire hall to
help offset any new construction required at the Public Works
Department.
If the Council is receptive to the idea of converting the fire
hall to accommodate community organizations, the Jaycees will
begin developing plans and cost estimates for the renovation
and seek participation from other community organizations such
as the Lions, VFW, and Legion Club. Many of the details could
be worked out in the future; but if the Council feels that it
is not appropriate for the City to donate the building without
some type of reimbursement or replacement facility, the
Jaycees will drop the issue at this time.
It should be noted that the food shelf organization has not
been contacted yet by the Jaycees to work out their space
needs, nor has the Christian Social Service Agency boon
involved with any discussions on relocation. It could turn
out that the Christian Social Service Agency is not interested
in locating at the fire hall site, which may put a dampor on
the Jaycees proposal. While the City's present use of the
facility may not be the best and highest use for the property,
it is assumed that tho City will be facod with replacing the
storage facility somewhere else.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
If the Council is receptive to the proposal of converting
the fire hall into a community organization facility, the
Jaycees will begin to develop a proposal for remodeling
with a cost estimate. How the building is managed after
remodeling could be worked out at a later date.
Council Agenda - 2/11/51
If the Council is not receptive to donating the fire hall
without some sort of reimbursement for the building's
value or without being provided a replacement structure,
Council could so indicate to the Jaycees that you do not
feel it's an appropriate plan at this time.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
When the proposal was initially discussed with City staff, the
staff was somewhat under the impression that not only would
the Jaycees and other community organizations provide the
funds to remodel the facility but would also reimburse the
City a reasonable value for the building so that we could
construct a new facility for our needs. The proposal at this
time would require the City to forego selling the property and
donate the building for community purposes. While the
proposal presented has merit, a number of issues would have to
be ironed out, including who manages the building, who
determines what organizations should be located there, and who
Is expected to pay the annual operating cost after it's
remodeled. If the Council is supportive, it should realize
that in all likelihood, we will have to replace the lost
storage capacity by building another structure somewhere else
on the public works grounds. Once a proposed remodeling plan
is presented, we will also have to address the parking
situation to see if this has an impact on parking requirements
within the area. I believe the staff realizes that this may
be the best use for the facility provided it does not become
a headache in managing or in upkeep cost in the future.
SUPPORTING DATA:
None.
Council Agenda - 2/11/91
5. Consideration of a resolution adootinq an ordinance amendment
establishinq a Parks Commission. (J.0. )
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Council is asked to review the attached ordinance amendment
establishing a Parks Commission, paying special attention to
section 2-5-10 which establishes the duties of the Commission.
The idea to establish a Parks Commission has surfaced from
time to time in the past few years. The idea may persist due
to the perceived need to provide a method for providing
community input into the direction of park development and
park programming.
Budqet Impact
Membership on the Parks Commission is voluntary, and staff
attendance (Roger Mack) at each meeting will not result in any
additional cost to the City. All recommendations made by the
Commission that result in a City expenditure must first be
approved by the City Council.
R. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to adopt a resolution establishing a Parks
Commission.
Under this alternative, Council takes the position that
a Parks Commission should be established to provide a
forum for community input, which is needed to develop a
parks system that meets the community's recreation needs.
Under this alternative, Council may wish to discuss the
duties noted by ordinance and make changes accordingly.
If Council selects this alternative, staff will then
advertise for membership.
2. Motion to deny adoption of a resolution establishing a
Parks Commission.
Under this alternative, Council would conclude that the
present method of establishing park plans is satisfactory
and, therefore, no changes are needed at this time.
4
Council Agenda - 2/11/91
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that a Parks Commission be established. The
actual cost to establish a Commission is minimal, and it
provides an opportunity for a broader base of community input.
The duties delineated in the ordinance provide a very general
description of possible activity which will allow the
Commission to focus on those areas that it believes are
important.
SUPPORTING DATA:
Resolution for adoption; Ordinance amendment establishing
Parks Commission.
RESOLUTION 91 -
RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN ORDINANCE
CREATING A CITY PARKS COMMISSION
WHEREAS, the Monticello City Council has recognized the need to
establish a City Parks Commission to provide information to
determine the park, recreation, and open space needs of the city,
and
WHEREAS, the Monticello City Council wishes to create a Parks
Commission pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 448.03 to
448.50.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Monticello City Council
hereby ordains that Ordinance Amendment No. _ shall be adopted.
Adopted this 11th day of February, 1991.
City Administrator
-4cO--1
Mayor
65)
1
r
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN THAT
TITLE 2 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE BE AMENDED BY ADDING THE
FOLLOWING CHAPTER CREATING A PARKS COMMISSION:
Chapter 6
Parks Commission
SECTION:
2-6-1: Name of the Commission
2-6-2: Authorization
2-6-3: Membership
2-6-4: Term of Office
2-6-5: Attendance
2-6-6: vacancy
2-6-7: Officers
2-6-8: Meetings
2-6-9: Quorum
2-6-10: Duties of the Commission
2-6-11: Amendments
2-6-1: NAME OF THE COMMISSION: The name of the organization
shall be the Monticello Parks Commission.
2-6-2: AUTHORIZATION: The authorization for the establishment
of this commission is set forth under Minnesota Statutes,
Section 448.56. Duties are delegated to the Parks Commission by
the City Council of Monticello by this ordinance dated
and power pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 448.56 to 448.56.
2-6-3: MEMBERSHIP: The Monticello Parks Commission shall
consist of five (5) regular members to be appointed by
the City Council of Monticello. All members shall have equal
rights and privileges. 41lep.'A'14.17410C,1y
2-6-4: TERM OF OFFICE: The term of the regular members shall be
for three (3) years and shall be staggered so that no
more than two members' terms expire in a given year. All regular
terms shall expire at the first City Council mooting of the now
calendar year.
2-6-5: ATTENDANCE: It is the City Council's intention to
encourage Parks Commission members to attend all Parks
Commission meetings. Should any Parks Commission member
be absent for more than throe meetings in a calendar
year, that member may be subject to replacement by the
City Council.
0
Ordinance Amendment No.
Page 2
2-6-6: VACANCY: Any vacancy in the regular or at large
membership shall be filled by the City Council, and such
appointee shall serve for the unexpired term so filled.
2 -6-7 : OFFICERS-
(A)
FFICERS-
(A) Elections. The City Parks Commission shall elect at its
January meeting from its membership a chair, vice chair, and
a secretary who shall serve for a term of one year and shall
have such powers as may be prescribed in the rules of said
commission.
( B) Duties of Chair. The chair shall preside at all meetings of
the Parks Cornmission and shall have the duties normally
conferred and parliamentary usage of such officers.
(C) Duties of Vice Chair. The vice chair shall act for the chair
in his absence.
( D) Duties of Secretary. A secretary may be appointed who is not
a member of the Parks Commission but can be employed as a
member of City staff. The secretary shall keep the minutes
and records of the commission; and with the assistance of
staff as is available shall prepare the agenda of the regular
and special meetings for commission members, arrange proper
and legal notice of hearings when necessary, attend to
correspondence of the commission, and other duties as are
normally carried out by a secretary.
2 -6- 8: MEETINGS :
( A) Meetings shall be held on . In the event of
a conflict with a holiday or special events, a majority at any
meeting may change the date and location of the meeting. The
meeting shall be open to the general public.
2 -6- 9: QUORUM: A majority of the total Parks Commission members
shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of
business .
2 -6- 10: DUTIES OF THE COMMISSION: It shall be the duty of the
commission, with staff assistance, to study and provide
information to determino the park, wasoabiew, and open space needs
of the city and make recommendations to the City Council in respect
thereof, including general and specific development standards and
critoria for evaluating specific sites, t— and~ob4Q=Iwos
,-nn,dia.
9
Ordinance Amendment No.
CPage 3
2-6-11: AMENDMENTS: This ordinance may be amended as recommended
by the majority vote of the existing membership of the
Parke Commission and only after a majority vote of the
City Council.
Adopted this lith day of February, 1991.
City Administrator
C
Mayor
0
443.03 PAM4i PARA%O'S A\11 PI-A\'GROu.1LIS 1919
CHAPTER 448 .
PARKS, PARKWAYS AND PLAYGROUNDS
44903 A{py 1 of and r0, puRn pad ,nd u1.:, P.— Som Na rum
esu Pnum W,Oa n, "135 AWml— mdr p—.dmp
ua,21 etcn,rnP ts-i , MA> a "I s. �RT4114 tn•tl an wn•,Yt
DI,Yl,wntls u1.35 Poen ar c--1 so 11" ,%nuams
Pu.N. d%M from f,4w-d,vgted
/aa[mmrM to n. ir«�ina qulrx "Isi P.— w: ,uttrom3or Oo,rds e(WA
wr1 domm,wawn in ours
u1 _3 Comanuraa tw lana eawemnda ta.
wn.
448.01 (Repealed, 1949c 119 s 1101
448.02 (Repeated, 1949c 119 s 1101
448.03 ACQUISITION OF LAND FOR PUBLIC PARK AND FAIR GROUND
PURPOStS.
Any city of the fourth mass, operating under a home rule charier, may acquire by
purchase or condemnation a tract of land not exceeding 25 acres, lying within the
corporate limits of the city, and devote the same to the uses of a public park and
incidentally maygram to the county agricultural society of the county in %hich the city
is situated the right to hold the annual county fair in the pan of the park as shall not
interfere with its general usefulness for park purposes.
History: (1134.1) 1919c 3451 1
449,04 (Repealed. 1976 c 44 s 7O}
448.05 (Repealed, 1976 a 44 s 701
449.06 (Repealed. 1976 a 44 s 701
"9.07 (Repealed, t 976c: 44 s 701
448.08 (Repealed. 1 945 a 861
448.09 (Repealed, 1 976 c 44 s 70J
"9.10 (Repealed, 1976 c 44 s 701
448,11 (Repealed, 1016 c 44 s 701
"8.12 (Repealed, 1976 c 44 s 701
"8,13 (Repealed, 1 976 a 44 s701
449,14 (Repealed. 1976 c 44 s 701
448.15 (Repealed, 1 916 a 44 s 701
"9.16 (Repealed. 1976 a 44 s 70)
448.17 (Repealed, 1959 c 251 s 11
448.19 1Repealed, 1959 a 251 s 11
"9.19 (Repealed, 1959 a 251 a 11
449.20 (Repealed, 1959 c 251 1 11
"8.21 F\CIIANGF LADS FOR PARKS OR PLAYGROUNDS.
Any city rc the first class in this state, is hereby empowered to exchange for other
lands to be used for pails or playgrounds. any hands acquired by the city for parts or
playground%, provided that at least two-thirds of all the members of its council shall
Approve such exchange and the board of park commissioners, or other hod) having
jurisdiction and cant rolof parks and playgrounds in the city, shall, by a two-thirds sate
thereof, request the council so to do.
I11%tor): (173 1) 1911 r .6 r 1
F 448.22 PURCIIASE OF LAND FROM FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FOR CIVIC
CENTER OR PUBLIC PARA.
Any city of the first class in the state, or any such city and the county in which it
is located, acting jointly, are hereby authorized to buy from the federal government,
upon such terms as may be agreed upon between the proper officials of the city or of
- the city and the county acting together, and the federal government, by written contract,
any property owned by the federal govemment which is needed for a civic center or
public park purposes, in the municipality.
History: (16301 1/1h) E.0933 r 6 s I
{
448.23 COMPENSATION FOR LAND CONDEMNED FOR PARAS.
When any cny of the first class in this state, shall cause to be condemned any land
! for public parks or parkway purposes, it shall thereupon cause to be paid to the owner
1 of this property the amount of damages, over and above all benefits, which may have
been awarded therefor, within one year after confirmation of the award or assessment.
or the final determination of any appeals therefor, with interest at the rate of five
percent per annum, but nothing in sections 448.23 to 448.25 shall take away any
existing right to annul and abandon the proceedings.
History: (1339) 1905 c 103 s I
448.24 PAYMENT FROM PARA FUND.
Any city of the first class is hereby authorised to pay the whole. or any pan, of any
award or judgment for land condemned for park or parkway purposes out of the park
fund, in case the city has on hand in the park fund, or can obtain by donation, bequest. `
or otherwise under lawful authority, moneys available therefor.
Ilistory: (1W) 19115 r 103 s 1
448.25 ABANDONMEN-l' OF PROCF.FDINGS.
Nothing contained in sections 448 23 to 448.25 shall deprne the city of the power
to abandon proceedings as now prosided by law.
Iltstor): (1 141) 1W)r r 103 s 3
448.26 [Repcaled, 1476 c 44 s 701
448.27 [Repcaled. 1444 c 114 s 1101
448,28 )Repealed. 1476 c 44 s 701
418.29 [Repeated, 1476 c 44 s 701
448.30 (Repealed, 1476 c 44 s 701
418,31 [Repealed, 1476 c 44 s 70)
448.32 (Repealed, 1476 c 44 s 701
448.33 (Repeated, 1976 c 44 s 701
448.14 (Repcaled. 1976 c 44 s'01
448,35 (Repealed. 1976 c 44 s 701
448.36 (Repealed. 1444 c 119s 1101
44937 [Repealed. 1444 c 119s 1101
448,39 [Repeated, 1944 c 114 s 1101
448.34 (Repealed. 1944 c 119s 1101
4411.40 [Repcaled, 1444 c 11Y& 1101
419.41 [Repcaled, 1944 c 119s 1101
449.42 [Repealed, 1449 c 114 s I I11)
449.4.1 [Repealed. 1976 c 44 s 701
449.44 (Repealed. 1976 c 44 s 701
s
MaV PARkS. PARA%AN SAND PIAN -GROUNDS 79pa
448.45 lRepcaled, 1976 c 44 s70)
448.46 lRepealed, 1976 c 44 s 70] -
448.47 IRcpcalcd. 1976 c 44 s701
448.48 1Repealed. 1976 c 44 s 70] ,
448.49 lRepealed. 1976 c 44 001 ,
448.50 MS 1967 Local, Minneapolis
448.51 AIS 1967 ILDcal. Minneapolis
c
448.52 AIS 1967 Local. Minneapolis
448.53 AIS 1967 Local, Minneapolis
418.54 REGUTATINGTRAA-ELON PARKWAYS.
The board
ofpark commissioners, or other governing body having controlofparks
and parkway's of any city of the first class. shall have polder to enact ordinances and
^
to prescribe penalties for the violation thereof for the purpose of regulating, controlling,
and limiting the use of, and travel upon and over, all parkways established by'the city;t[
in or adjacent to the cit,-hetherthe parkways -ere originally established as parkways
sa
or were streets or high-ay's before being taken as parkways and. among other things,
4
to e.x.clude from these parkways all vehicles in use for any purpose except carrying
r
passengers. For the purpose of sections 448.54 and 448.55, the term 'parkway' shall
include the roadways and carriage -way's of parks as -ell as parkways.
a
listory: (1543) 1907 r 440 ,r 1
♦'
448.55 POWER OFCOUNCII-TO LEVY ASSESSMENTS NOT DIVISTEI).
Section 449.54 shall not divest or deprive the council of the cit y of any jurisdiction
or power now existing by vinue of any statute or charter, to lesy assessments for the
grading, protecting, improving, and ornamentingofany public park, square, or grounds
no. or hereafter laid out, and for planting and protecting shade and ornamental trees
and for constructing or reconstructing sewers, sidewalks, retaining-'alls, gutters, curb-
ing, and for boulevards, macadamising, and paving in or upon any streets set apart for
park and park -ay purposes.
listory: (1544) IPOs c 440 s 2
449.56 POWERS AND AII.1'110RI'Il' OF BOARDS OF PARK CO%I,%IISSION-
ERS IN CI'I'II:S.
Subdivision 1. Authority to tsmbii%h and maintain. The board of park commis•
sronen of each of the cities in this state shall have authority to devise, plan, and
estahlish a system of public parks and parkways and, from time to time, to slier and
extend the same and to add thereto; to designate the lands and grounds to he used,
appropriated, and acquired for such purposes; to take possession of the tamr, or on)'
c
pan thereof, upon obtaining title thereto. and to improse, govern, and maintain the
same for such purposes.
Subd. 2. Superintendence. The board of park commissioners shall have authorit
Lodi rect. superintend, and regulate the planting, culture, and preservation of shade and
ornamental trees, shrubbery, and turf in the streets, avenues, alleys, and puhlicgrounds
of the city. and in such pans thereof as may be lawfully placed under the jurisdiction
and control of the hoard of park commissioners.
No shade or ornamental trees, shrubbery, or turf growing in the streets, avenues,
alleys, and public grounds of the city shall be destroyed or removed e%cept by lease in
anti ng first obtained from the president of the board of park commissioners, the same
to be duly' countersigned and recorded by the secretary of the board.
a
'The board of pad commissioner may, by proper ordinnnees, provide for the
♦'
enforcement of this su'udivisinn and for the preservation of such trees, shrubbery, and
turf and of %% prnahin for the violas ion of thew ordinance, and the municipal coup
ty
of the city shall have jurisdiction of all oRlnses opimi these ordinancet.
57
Council Agenda - 2/11/91
6. Consideration of a resolution adoptinq an ordinance amendment
establishing requlations qoverninq trapping activitn. (J.O.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Some months ago, Shirley Anderson informed staff that a
constituant was concerned that trapping was being conducted
within the city limits of Monticello and that such activity
could possibly harm pets and children. It was her request
that City staff prepare an ordinance regulating trapping
activity.
In response to this request, staff has put together an
ordinance that draws from a number of ordinances now in place
throughout the state of Minnesota.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to adopt a resolution amending Title 7 of the
Monticello City Ordinance by adding a chapter regulating
trapping within the city limits of Monticello.
If Council wishes to approve or approve and modify the
proposed ordinance, this alternative should be selected.
2. Motion to deny adoption of a resolution amending Title 7
of the Monticello City Ordinance by adding a chapter
regulating trapping within the city limits of Monticello.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the amendment. The ordinance
amendment draws ideas from numerous ordinances now in place
throughout the state of Minnesota. The ordinance takes away
the right of any individual to conduct trapping within the
city limits of Monticello. This includes all areas along the
Mississippi River and areas within the county parks. However,
this ordinance does not eliminate the ability of individuals
to trap rodents, etc. It is staff's view that this ordinance
is a positive stop for the City because it may not make sense
to allow trapping activity in an urbanized area, as such
activity can represent a hazard to pots and children.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of resolution for adoption; Copy of the proposed
ordinance amendment.
6
RESOLUTION 91 -
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ORDINANCE REGULATING
TRAPPING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF MONTICELLO
WHEREAS, the Monticello City Council has recognized the need to
regulate trapping of wild animals, as the setting of traps creates
the potential for harm to children and domestic animals that come
into contact with traps, and
WHEREAS, the Monticello City Council wishes to establish
regulations that govern trapping within the city limits of the city
of Monticello.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Monticello City Council
hereby ordains that Ordinance Amendment No. _ shall be adopted.
Adopted this 11th day of February, 1991.
City Administrator
C
Mayor
9
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO.
THE CITY COUNCIL. OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN THAT
TITLE 7 OF THE CITY ORDINANCE BE AMENDED BY ADDING THE FOLLOWING
CHAPTER REGARDING TRAPPING:
Chapter 8
TRAPPING
SECTION:
7-8-1:
Purpose
7-8-2:
Definitions
7-8-3:
Violations
7-8-4:
Penalty
7-8-5:
Exceptions
7-8-1: PURPOSE: It is the purpose of this ordinance to preclude
the potential harm that may be inflicted upon people,
particularly children, and to prevent the maiming, unselective
catching, and destruction of wild animals and birds and domestic
animals that come in contact with traps.
1 7-8-2: DEFINITIONS: As used in this ordinance, the terms below
have the meanings described.
(A) Trap: Any mechanical device or snare which seeks to hold,
capture, or kill an animal.
(B) Trappinq: The setting or laying or otherwise using of a trap
in the platted residential areas and parks of Monticello.
7-8-3: VIOLATIONS: Trapping in all areas within the city of
Monticello, Including parks areas, is prohibited.
7-8-4: PENALTY: Any person, firm, or corporation who violates
any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty
of a misdemeanor and subject to a fine not to exceed $500 or
imprisonment not to exceed 90 days.
7-8-5: EXCEPTIONS:
(A) The provisions of this ordinance do not apply to the use of
any trap specifically designed to kill rats, mico, gophers, or
moles.
(B) Tho provisions of this ordinance do not apply to the use of
cago typo live traps employed for the control of nuisance animals
as long as such traps are tended each 12 hours.
0
Ordinance Amendment No.
Page 2
(C) The provisions of this ordinance do not apply to
representatives of the city, county, or state, who may, in the
course of their duties, be required to use a trap to trap, snare,
kill, or otherwise restrain the free movement of any wildlife,
animal, or bird for humane or authorized purposes.
(D) The provisions of this ordinance do not apply to teachers
trapping for educational programs or scientists for the purpose of
studying animals, wildlife, or birds which will be returned to
their natural environment uninjured .
Adopted by the Council this _ day of , 1991.
City Administrator
C
Mayor
9)
Council Agenda - 2/11/91
7. Consideration of buying new brush and tree chipper for the
tree department. (J.S.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The City has a 1975 Asplund tree chipper which was purchased
through a state grant program for $4,887. The City paid 50%
of this cost. City crews have used the machine for the past
16 years in the Dutch Elm disease program and for
miscellaneous brush and tree clean up in various areas of the
city. The mulch produced from the chipping has been used in
various reforestation projects, park pathways, and given away
to city residents and landscapers.
Although the machine has been kept up quite well, it does have
limited use, as its reasonable capacity is only 4 -inch
diameter brush or limbs, and it cannot be used for any dried
or slightly dirty brush. Any amount of dried brush or
slightly dirty brush causes the blades to become immediately
dull. Because of the design of the chipper, it takes
approximately throe to four hours to replace the blades.
Several things have happened to cause us to look toward
replacing our existing chipper. The first and primary reason
is due to safety concerns. Our existing chipper system uses
the high-speed, rotating cutter head to feed the stock into
the unit. Therefore, the minute a piece of brush or limb
contacts the cutting head, it is immediately pulled or ripped
out of the operator's hands through the machine at high speed.
There are no safety stop devices on this machine whatsoever,
as worker's safety was not such a top priority 16 years ago as
it is today. I've discussed the possibility of retrofitting
the machine with some type of safety devices with Tom Gross,
a loss control representative from EBA, the City's worker's
compensation carrier. It would be extremely difficult to
retrofit this machine, as there is no controllable food, and
the deceleration of the engine and cutting blado flywheel
takes a significant amount of time. In addition, if the City
did retrofit a piece of equipment with some type of safety
devices, we would become liable for their reliability. The
now sLylo chippers have controllable feed rates at a much
lower pace. In addition, the operator can stop or start the
food at the point of brush entry to the machine. The feed
stops instantaneously in these nower machines.
The second reason for replacing the chipper is due to the high
maintenance of the existing machine and the limited
capabilities. Beginning in 1992, no longer will we be able to
send Christmas trees or any other yard waste to the landfill
or waste processing facility. The City has already redirected
Council Agenda - 2111/91
leaves and grass clippings to our compost facility.
Consequently, we are going to need a chipper which can handle
more dried, slightly dirty brush along with Christmas trees,
etc., when those are restricted also.
In preparation for the proposed purchase, we placed an amount
of $14,000 in the 1991 budget. We have had demonstrations
from two separate manufacturers and suppliers of chippers.
Truck Utilities Manufacturing Company of St. Paul sells and
services the Model 290 Morbark hydraulic brush chipper. This
model meets our specifications but during the demonstration
was slightly underpowered, and some problems were also noted
with the hydraulic feed system. This unit sells for1; 4,500.
The second unit demonstrated was the Brush Bandit Model 200+.
This unit is sold by Road Machinery S Supplies of Bloomington.
This model also meets our specifications and during a 2 -day
full demonstration chipped everything we could put in it from
green to dry and slightly dirty brush all the way up to 12
inches in diameter with no loss of power. The hydraulic feed
systems and safety devices were positive and fast on this
machine as well as the other machine demonstrated. This Brush
Bandit machine from Road Machinery sells for $14,441 and is
preferred by the public works crew.
We asked both firms what they thought our existing chipper was
worth in trade. RMS indicated a trade-in value of $2,000,
while Truck Utilities indicated a $2,800 trade-in value.
Typically, the City has surpassed any of the trade-in values
by advertising and selling much of its used equipment outright
to the general public. It is the staff •a opinion that we
could obtain at least $2,800 for our chipper by selling it
outright and, in all reality, should receive a much higher
offer. Therefore, it seems the chipper should be offered to
the general public for the highest bid.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS;
The first alternative is to authorize purchase of the
Model 200+ Brush Bandit chipper from Road Machinery for
an amount of $14,441 and to authorize City staff to
advertise our existing Asplund chipper to be sold to the
highest bidder. Should the staff's opinion of the value
of the machine be in error, we would still have a
guaranteed trade from RMS of $2,000. However, under this
alternative, it is expected that we would faro much
better.
l
Council Agenda - 2/11/91
2. The second alternative would be to delay purchase of the
chipper until the outright sale value of the used chipper
is known. It is expected that in 30 days we could have
the value known, with the City having the right to reject
bids or place a minimum bid on the unit.
3. The third alternative would be not to purchase a new
chipper at this time. This does not appear to be in the
best interest of the City due to the safety issues and
limited capacity of the existing equipment.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director and Park
and Street Superintendent that the City Council authorize the
purchase of the Brush Bandit Model 200+ chipper from RMS as
outlined in alternative 01. City staff is comfortable with
the value of our chipper being sold outright for a price in
excess of $2,800.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copies of the specifications and quotes from Truck Utilities
and Road Machinery and Supplies.
FEB 01 '91 12:F6 TFUCY UTILITIES
January 31, 1991
city of Monticello
P.O. Box 83A
250 East Broadway
Monticei lo, MN. 55362
Attn:Roger
Dear Roger:
P.2
Mae 011) AU -330!
fu; 0612} 4aa-0070
Truck Utilities & Mfg. Inc.
2370 ENOUSM - COW11 OF MIOMM1VAY 3/ - SUM PAUL AAMHE SOTA 13109.2001
'TOUR COOP.M Tt=10WHAttn MtADMARTUS'
Listed below are specifications for your review:
ONE 0) NEW MORBARk MODEL 290 HYDRAULIC BRUSH CHIPPER: q
Equipped with the following:
Rear infeed chute with quick shut-off, reversible food works control
2 -wheel hydraulic feed compression system
Complete hydraulic system including tank, pump and Control valves
Lockable seal -tight fuel i hydraulic tank ceps
37-1/2" X 2" split -knife chipper disc with 2 double edged knives. 3/4" chip size
36" swivel discharge spout with 12" dflector for direct looding;overall height of 8'4"
• Single axle. 6000# capacity suspension iwth 7.00 1 15 load range "0" tires
Safety chains, tell light and wiring package
Wrench kit; box end, alien wrenches
2 1/2" luno ring towing hitch
• Hercules Model G1600 water-cooled gas engine
2000# tongue jack with stationary foot pad
Lockable battery box on trailer frame
Lockable tool box mounted on chipper housing
optional Equipment:
4 -knife chipper disc inl lou of standard
Additional double edged chlppre knives
Fines screeen over engine radiator
Discharge chute with 360' rotation end height adjustment
20000 tongue Jack iwth swivelling castor wheel
Total Selling Price..........FOB .......... .-.3 14.500.00
Thank you for letting us work wiht you on your equipment needs. if you have any question
plea so feel free to contact us.
SinceretIy.
Tom Trevorrow
EEGER BEEVER
BEEVER SALES CORP. • P.O. BOX 800 a WINN, MI 48896 0(517)866-2770 a(800)?55.7691
GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS
Lonath:
13'6' Umar feed)
Height:
104' f oar feed)
Width:
62'
Weight:
4045 Ds. with gasoline engine
4650 As. with diesel engine
TRAILER:
7 I LI' X 4'X.1'8' (A-8 grade stool
Frame:
2' X 6- rectangular stool tubing
Chlppor Shaft:
with supportgusse
Axle:
6000 R, capacity with loaf springs
Tiros:
9.50 X 16.5 for dfosol and 6
CAM— ar Housing:
cylinder engine; 7.00 X 15.00 for
4 Cvkndar ansollne enolne
Hach:
2 12' pinto eye or 2- ball
Vortical hoighr adjustment
CH/PPERASS_EM_B_ LY
Chipper Disc.
37 12'dumefor X 2'thich
machined face and dm
Knife Pockets (2):
Milled into face of disc, staggered
pattern 180 degrees opposite
_each ofnor
Chipper Knrvos:
7 I LI' X 4'X.1'8' (A-8 grade stool
_
_dual adOnd chtppai knivn j
Chlppor Shaft:
Precision machined, 4'
diameter at hub, tapered to
_
2718 _Dail Deans
CAM— ar Housing:
3;;8' back side wall
12' front side wan
31i'top hood
3:8'bolry band
2 salary access doors for knife
charging
4 gussetod, geometrically
_ anylod fan blades,
QAipptngCapactly
12_d7amerYr,
Anvd.
ADrastve rssisr9nt �ards_n_e_tl_IaC_I
__
Disc Speed:
_
Mnimum1130RPMs
CHIPPER INFEED SYSTEM
Infoed Spout: Side wall (right side) 12'
Floor 1/2'
Inlood Chute: 38'X 34' 12 guago stool
36' to moshooinf of food rollers
Food Rollers: Two 8'X 18' hydraulically
powomd, coupled to 2' diamotor
shafts, oquppod with serrated
tooth, tuning blades and
fftll length cleaner bar
Food Roller 2' X 8'X 19'solid stool arm
Pivot Arm: with dual down pressure springs
InfoodOpening: 12- vortical oponing
18' horizontal opening
Hinged clean out door below
bottom food wheal
HYDRAULICSYSTEM
9�allon, vonfod� Vrauhc tank with mash slmrnor on h:lnr_ .
Roplaceabb spl _F pohlbr andand cane _
6Wm veno t apump•droci dtiva hem cher mart_
DLL h raulkhogILum no lbw dividers
J_wavaNa: Forward • Neutral •• Reverse _.
2GoroLarsfrauhcmororsL9lcu m.dLspl mm1 _
Safety lead Control bar with
lonvgrg - nnu([L1I - reyar"
ATANDARO.FEATURES
(iearinraodevsrem _ _ - _ -
7Aalion fuel rank; dralnpNg lv
nntl shufoft vae
tnetl sAAft! On h mule Iced rolbra
SA/®r ar+d maNtanance obcal!
r4rorb manual
$Afe�ChAln9,$/16' Ham AUOy wAhglab hOOk9 _
ICC rapularlgn hgnr8
SJ
WARRANTY
12 month on chipper and frame assembly
OEM warranty effective for engine, tires, and
battery
OPTIONS/ACCESSORIES
Four knife chipper disc
Special color paint: acrylic or polyurethane
12.0006.50 Tires with heavy-duty fenders
Special tail 1 fights with hermetic lens
Electric and surge brakes
Special discharge chute collar to allow 360'
continuous rotation without wrenches
th" Chip size on 4 -knife disc to provide
120'/minute feed rate
Engine radiator screen
Shock absorbers
Gate valve on hydraulic tank
Telescoping tongue
C
ENGINE OPTIONS
Ford Model 423, water-cooled, gasoline engine.
60 -HP @ 2600 RPM, with complete eng ine
enclosure and Clutch
Hercules Model G. 1600. water-cooled gasoline
engine. 58 -HP ea 2800 RPM, with complete engine
enclosure and clutch
Cummins Model 483.9, water cooled diesel
engine, 75 -HP ea 2400 RPM, with complete engine
enclosure and clutch
Ford Model CSG -649, water cooled gasoline
engine, 102 -HP ca 2800 RPM, with complete
engine enclosure and clutch
Ford Model 444, water-cooled diesel engine, 80
HPQa 2400 RPM, with completeengine enclosure
and clutch
White Model 0-2300. water-cooled diesel engine.
68 -HP Ca 2500 RPM, with complete engine
enclosure and clutch
John DeereModel 4239. water-cooled diesel
engine, 70 -HP ea 2400 RPM, with complete engine
enclosure and clutch
C
SALES, RENTAL AND SEaviCE OF CONSTRUCTION, MINING, FOREST PY AND TRUCK EOVIPMENT SINCE 1926
10
RMS
ROAD MACHINERY
b SUPPLIES CO.
111>x:r<ae+aw r
Q U 0 T A T 1 0 M
9180 PILLSBURY AVS. 80.
8100MIWTON.UN 4sA20
6121M -2M
FAX 8121SU-9445
WATB 0=80.7071
City of Monticello Quotation # 11299
Date: January 23, 1991
P.O. Box 1107 Quoted: F.O.B. Bloomington. Minnesota
Monticello, MN 55362 Quote firm until: February 27. 1991
Attn: Roger Mach
Road Machinery d Supplies is pleased to submit the
following quotation for your consideration:
ONE (1) NEW BRUSH BANDIT MODEL 200+ BRUSH CHIPPER
WITH THE FOLLOWING:
ENGINE: Ford CSG -649 6 -cylinder gasolineengine.
119-harsepower at 2,800 RPM, complete with stan-
dard Venturi carburetor, mechanical governor,
spin -On filter, dry type air cleaner, 37 -amp
alternator, starter, centrifugal vacuum advance
distributor, fuel pump with filter and instru-
ment panel with throttle and choke controls, oil
pressure, water temperature and ammeter gauges.
TRAILER: 2" x 6" rectangular metal tubing with
support gusset.
SAFETY CHAINS: Two (2) 1116' lints x 30" length
with grab hooks.
• TIRES: Two (2) 9.50 x 16.5. B -ply, load range
'D" tires and 2,600# rims.
CASTOR WHEEL with 2,000 ib. tongue Jack.
• HYDRAULIC TANK: 8 -gallon Capacity with integral
coaling baffle, mesh screen on filler, hydraulic
outlet and spin -on cartridge filter on return
lana with a lockable cap and sight gauge as
standard.
- FUEL TANK: 24.5 -gallon minimum with a mesh
a -'la ,_: >:+o
FM; I, Q UI T
0:
'9: a:,::
I:la%
a •1: aaa 2
Fns T,e...
a
SALES, RENTAL AND SEaviCE OF CONSTRUCTION, MINING, FOREST PY AND TRUCK EOVIPMENT SINCE 1926
10
RMS
ROAD MACHINERY
b SUPPLIES CO.
111>x:r<ae+aw r
Q U 0 T A T 1 0 M
9180 PILLSBURY AVS. 80.
8100MIWTON.UN 4sA20
6121M -2M
FAX 8121SU-9445
WATB 0=80.7071
City of Monticello Quotation # 11299
Date: January 23, 1991
P.O. Box 1107 Quoted: F.O.B. Bloomington. Minnesota
Monticello, MN 55362 Quote firm until: February 27. 1991
Attn: Roger Mach
Road Machinery d Supplies is pleased to submit the
following quotation for your consideration:
ONE (1) NEW BRUSH BANDIT MODEL 200+ BRUSH CHIPPER
WITH THE FOLLOWING:
ENGINE: Ford CSG -649 6 -cylinder gasolineengine.
119-harsepower at 2,800 RPM, complete with stan-
dard Venturi carburetor, mechanical governor,
spin -On filter, dry type air cleaner, 37 -amp
alternator, starter, centrifugal vacuum advance
distributor, fuel pump with filter and instru-
ment panel with throttle and choke controls, oil
pressure, water temperature and ammeter gauges.
TRAILER: 2" x 6" rectangular metal tubing with
support gusset.
SAFETY CHAINS: Two (2) 1116' lints x 30" length
with grab hooks.
• TIRES: Two (2) 9.50 x 16.5. B -ply, load range
'D" tires and 2,600# rims.
CASTOR WHEEL with 2,000 ib. tongue Jack.
• HYDRAULIC TANK: 8 -gallon Capacity with integral
coaling baffle, mesh screen on filler, hydraulic
outlet and spin -on cartridge filter on return
lana with a lockable cap and sight gauge as
standard.
- FUEL TANK: 24.5 -gallon minimum with a mesh
_ +3 S : 13 _,
:.0 PM CWVJT� a:
?1 Of..- ..:c3 S it_- 333 3.+[ tins t.E. P. 0=
( Quotation f 11299 RCAD.rAn"IMcpr 6 YUPPLixe page 2
screen on filler, 3/4" minimum drain plug, fuel
line equipped with a shut-off valve, lockable
filler cap and sight gauge as standard. Fuel
tank shock mounted with rubber strap cushions
on all holding brackets.
- FASTENERS: Grade i8 with self-locking nuts in
appropriate arkas,
- TOWING HITCH: 2' ball or 2.1/2" lunet ring
Crofts hitch Kith five height positions from
20" to 28" in 2" increments.
- LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL SYSTEM: 12 volt system
including brake,taillights, license plate and
directional lights. Taillights are torsion moun-
ted in a hermetic lens„ lab and road proven for
resistance to rain, road salts, corrosion, ex-
treme cold or heat, shock mounted in rubber
grommets. All wiring protected by electrical
conduit located inside frame. Front and rear
marks r lights, O.O.T. approved. Six -prong elec-
trical connector.
- PAINT: Prime coated and finish sprayed with a
two-part polyurethane process.
- HYDRAULIC FEED SYSTEM: Includes two (2) powered
feed wheels, I7" long minimum. Both wheels
supported by bearings located at the extreme end
of each wheel. Cutterbars positioned at the ex-
treme end of the feed teeth and cutterbers wel-
ded at each end for support. Top feed wheel hes
two (2) 14" adjustable springs for ample down
pressure located one an each side of top fetid
wheel. Feed wheels powered by minimum 3,000 PSI
hydraulic pump. The complete feed system
operates at a ninimum of 2,500 PSI.
CHIPPER CUTTING WHEEL: 40" diameter x 2' thick.
The entire face and rim of the cutting wheel are
machined to exact tolerances with heavy duty
chipper hood of 3/16" sides and 1/a' top. Chip-
per hood is connected with I' diameter locking
pin. Stationary auction of chipper hood suppor-
ted with 1/4" x 2' x 2" angle iron. Cutting
wheel center hub is 1" x 15' x 16' veldment
for adequate support. Knife fastener nuts reces-
sed into the chipper disc for wear protection,
- ;AFETY INFEED CHUTE: Opening is 998 square
Inches and supported by a 3/4- pipe voided comp -ll
lately around the opening, Chute lengpth is min-
imum 36* from nip point at fend -haai. ..
�: �:,_: :::�•� E =l'> ..+J any cow:H
S 6:] 998 9.,0 RMS T.L. D. e6
Ouctation # 11,299 *CAP M.Aw.acwraaun.ua• Page 3
t
x 1" x 6" plastic wear strips to ensure smooth
operation. A shut-off bar located on the three
sides of infeed chute allows actuation of the
feed wheels forward/off/raversa. The shut-off
bar is supported by two (2) 1" threaded rods.
BEARINGS: Two (2) each 2.7/16" flanged spherical
roller type with removal mounts for easy rep-
lacement. Bearings will have the following
ratings: static 53.5001, basic 31.400#, radial
3.5401 and 20.000 minimus; life hours.
FEED RATE: 120' per minute.
CHIPPER SHAFT: 4' at hub. Chipper housings of
1/2" front end back steel plata with 1/4 steel
belly band. Belly bands welded solid. not skip
welded.
- ADJUSTABLE FEED ANVIL: with abrasion resistant
edge.
CHIPPER KNIVES: Four (4) each double-edged high
carbon, high chrome steel mounted two (2) each
Iii two (2) pockets. Knife dimensions 4"wide x
3/8"thick x 7.1/4°long.
- DISCHARGE TRANSITION: 9" square to B" round x
3/16" thick steel weldment.
- BLOWER: Six (6) reinforced paddles mounted on
cutting wheel for complete discharge and elim-
ination of chute plug in Paddle dimensions 3'
x S'angle x 6"long x 3/B thick.
- DISCHARGE CHUTE: 23-1/2' radius x 62' long sheet
metal construction with 360 degree continuous
swivel. quick change di:charge (tool -less) and
12" fingertip adjusted chip deflector.
- CHIPPER CAPACITY: 12' diameter.
- BELT GUARDS: Furnished to completely enclose all
power systems, Guard: hove all seems welded in-
side and out.
NOISE LEVEL: 80 decibels at 50', 360 degrees
around unit. This level will be slightly higher
{ when cutting, depending on the material being
chipped.
- LENGTH: 13'
- WIDTH: 7 96 (7). NEIGNT: 96.1/2
- TOTAL WEIGHT: 4,600# Nominal
- - - Pi: DULUT-
p+
.t ell". 1:zV S 5:: W 9++: R.. -.S T.E.D. 07
CQuota t i tin P 11299 RGAC MAGMtNERY i aUPAa lte Paye 4
- TONGUE WEIGHT: 2504 Nominal
- THROTTLE CONTROL: Vernier push-button type.
- HYDRAULIC HOSE- Protected by hose guards in all
wear areas.
- REMOVABLE RADIATOR SCREEN.
- RADIATOR GUARD RAILS.
- TACHOMETER.
- HOURMETER.
LOCKABLE TOOL BOX.
- LOCKABLE BATTERY BOX.
- MANUAL: One (1) parts and maintenance manual Is
Included.
- VIDEO TAPE: One (1) Instructional Operator
Safety and Maintenance VMS video tape included.
FOLDING INFEED TRAY.
EXTRA KNIVES: Additional set of four (4) dual -
edged knives.
SELLINGPAlCE.. ....1 14,441.00
F.O.S. Bloomington, -Minnesota
Price includes no applicable taxes
TRADE..........................DEDUCT (f 2,000.00)
1975 Asplundh drum chipper
Thank you for the opportunity to work with you on
your equipment needs. If we can be of any further
assistance, do not hesitate to tail on us.
Sincorely,
Andy sill 7
T err i tory Manager
No one owes us their business. We know we need to earn it! That's why we are constantly
improving the Bandit. We want to share with you some recent features that are now available
for lite 100 at id 200+.
HEAVIER FRAME
IMPROVED /ITDRAULIC
FEED WHEEL DRIVE
All P-1, Pnn 1.1 by d
I"i rtrt{'tYrta .ern bn:l
.,If, a hnnvy duly
r,-nplrr In held the
hydr.mhc dnvn —t—
v, thn 1-1 whr 1 ch+tl,
ihn r, q Lm 1 rw d- n
:nw Irk 11,r
n113 III
•wl •rte lvr. t,
1hn r9vn
ani . ! n r i
t ml to r, rhe f-,1 rr !I
,,, Ind n !I cMtr
Pith tip and Icll:\m
fml h-1 m,h,m nen
I i by f -.ivy duty �Ip
t rb A kit In m,vr-n
nxclln3 ma:i1JL`n to
itla
nnw rtyln r'nl'Ilno and
-Pp." Y.t om I.
a,rnt!aL!o Ircm the Ian
d.1 Parta L�.1'-�rtmrnl
2" it 6" - 3116" thick
wall tubular frames
with a 3" x 6" tubular
steel towing lonqu-
The 6" Irama rs starn
dard on the 200 r
and optralml on the
Model 100 A wider
frame in also avall._Ihln
for the 100 and
200, The w,dnr
machine Iradern
euimnr and n Yea^r, to
D—.. when backing
The wider Iram� In
crcaan the width of
the machme from 65"
to 75"
QUICK CHANGE DISCHARGE
11,n rw itton of d,n 160' dir1 + 1n .in nnr In cfungni to rr•ond�
wlthmn the use el loch The mirk change lo-kmo diener u erm{-!n nm1
m T.nIA-1 n rnli rnn
r 'r rr--nan A 1.1 I
lun r rtnenrt
--ng mvhrnrn In thn
.M rinw oyin rr,i,k r1n qn
dlzh+son r�+mp n nla
nvndeldn denugh rue
f Parti Dvs--imm�nt S-
thea d:-, Mr
Ir ..
� Y{if+�•�'. �1� _Ir, �� int+•,n
Ing - II ilii {v.m
j•'tlil''�I�� tgwnrda dig ry�r+tris
1 b' 1-1ti- lhnr rinm n
n IMI , f,{, ,.int t.;t
i thn mp rv-, Wn lh:nk
rq-1 rn nen rmrtnr
th+n Ihm flnralu Irr
ling hnub rwo:ng thn
r i ' dshargo to tho rear
� ,k,�I 1 cr tz t— d,4
W. ala uu! Ido n q,l:,k
,h—q. handle Ice ihn
chp delfeacr
A
FEATURES - THE BANDIT DIFFEREME
EASY TO PEED, ECONOMICAL TO RUN
• Wide infeed spout - for easy feeding.
• Powerful, reversible feed system - aggres•
sively feeds wood into the chipper and protects
against kickback.
• law fuel consumption
• Match chipping needs to the right power
unit - Gas or diesel engines available from
60 -HP to I I9•14P.
DISCHARGE Cl11rS IN ANY pInmitON
WITII NON -PLUGGING SFVIV111 DISCHARGE
CHUTE
• Discharge chute swings 360 degrees.
• Chip deflector easy to change with wing nut
adjuster.
• Pack the chip box;lull -six specially designed
chip throwers provide maximum throwing
power.
• Non-restrictive square to round transition
designed to prevent plugging,
LOW KNIFE COSTS - EASY TO CHANCE
• Knives changed in ten minutes.
• Set of knives is one third the cost ot many
competitive chippers.
• Knives are dual edged and can be sharpened
many times.
PRODUCES DIMENSIONAL CHIP - IDEAL FOR
ENERGY, NURSERIES, LANDSCAPING,
AND FOR COMPOSTING SEWAGE SLUDGE
We produce a dimensional chip, and our machines
run quiet with little vibration because:
1. Disc is machined to close tolerances and is 2"
thick and 40" in diameter with plenty of support
at the rim and the hub.
2. Chipper base Is heavy-duty to prevent flexing.
3. Solid 14r/i' knife pocket completely covers die
Weed anvil with each pass of the knife.
4. Easy to adjust anvil allows you to maintain an
exact clearance between die knife and the anvil.
S. Feed system b synchronized to the feed rate of
the chipper.
OVER THE LIFE OF THE MACII#INE,- THE BANDIT COULD PAT FOR ITSELr JUST IN
OPERATING COST SAVINGS
One tree service company who operates numerous chippers kept detailed operating cost records on all the
chippers In their fleet. The Bandit's hourly operating cost was sabetanUaUr lower than We end
closest machllne. r5)
FERFOBNANEE - THE RRNDIT DIFFERENCE
^ -Tv] rMe
a
TPF. BANDIT TARTS "I Ri: TIME AND
EXPENSE OUT Or TREE REMOVAL
• Less chain saw trimming. Tire
B.indrl's rownrfrt4 am.:r i:,e, 17" vnde ,
2500 PSI fps d system CRL "hes and ccm
premes limbs into the clul-rer
• Chip, regardless of the tree length.
No nc:d to cut to short leciutha to clop.
• Chip more of the tree, up to 12" d».
• Chip multiple pieces.
• Chip limby materials includtsng
Christmas tree3.
• Chip stringy and viney materials
without plugging or wrapping.
Cutts-rbar c1ts mstcra@; that lund to wrap,
Infeed :rout dewgn F:urmn!cs lu3nTur-
TWO BANDIT MODELS TO CHOOSE FROM
Both the Mada1 100 and 200+ Brush Bandit; ore :built with the none high qu'rlit y rtandsrfla
and txrjic lniture. that havo mode. tho Bandit the best brush chippor on tho- mork41. Nost of the
Auturr-s and bortelits (krcrihrd in thi. brochure apply to both mock -1.q. The, dlderences are:
MODEL 100
• Uvcr 1 Si)n mu, iun-.i nut into cl:cr3hon
rune I �4R:i
• Productive 70 11, m lc-Yi ralre
• Powerful f( --i iyrtf,m with Iremfrdcv�
cru-i.utI pvwty r
• 1 krufa pvi-kct will, 1wr 7'4" krtrvcZ1
MODEL 200+
• {4ur rcwc_t and in, 't 1 :1 :: rr uivrH. m-
trod,v, d In r 1927
i Fa.'.rr ff"i nits, - 1:0 f I� m
• Fn --',,r fvt�d .gtr,r in with yrs %V, r cru_ h:rr7
pfyNfr
• Ridt'lter rri7rd-i
i 2 - kri2o 1> Al L, ro-h with two 7! <" kmvm
;i .
Council Agenda - 2/11/91
Consideration of increasincl the minimum recyelinq requirements
from six to nine materials per quarter. (J. S.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
During 1990, Monticello city residents generated 2146.63 tons
of waste. Of this tonnage, 23.88 or 511.89 tons were recycled
at curb side. The remaining 1,634.74 tons were sent to the
landfill. Participation, based on a bi-weekly basis, averaged
729 for the year. The actual monthly participation rate would
be higher.
Although participation in the program remains high, we must
remember that with a minimum number of six materials needed to
be recycled over a quarter, some residents have chosen to
recycle only the minimum amount. Consequently, the tonnage
recycled during the third quarter of 1990 is 18.18 less than
the same period in 1989. In addition, the tonnage recycled
for the fourth quarter of 1990 is 17.68 less than the fourth
quarter of 1989. Consequently, the tonnages to the landfill
are up significantly in the fourth quarter of 1990. At this
point in time, we have not been able to ascertain whether this
drop is shared equally between single family residents and
apartment dwellers, or whether some of the effect may be the
economy or buying habits, the latter of which does not appear
to be significant, as the tonnage to the landfill is still
high. I would like to point out that even with the reduced
amount of tonnage, the City of Monticello remains one of the
loaders in the county and state with the participation rate
and the tonnages recovered through curb-sido recycling
programs.
The data received from the January collections is very
encouraging. During January, there were three Thursday
pickups ( normally only two). Essentially, under our existing
system, if a homeowner would have recycled all three products
on those occasions, he would have nine points for the quarter
just by recycling in January. This is three points more than
are currently required for the entiro quarter. The total
tonnage of waste produced in January was 200 .49 tons. Of this
amount, 65.49 tons or 32.78 was recycled at curb side. This
Included 2,080 pounds of plastic. Tho first pickup of plastic
was 800 pounds, the second 940 pounds, and the third 1,140
pounds. The average Is 20% above our expectations. These
figures will change slightly, as some of the plastic we are
gotting is not acceptable, as they aro not only number 1 or
number 2's, and many caps and covers are being included.
Council Agenda - 2/11/91
At the last Council meeting, Councilmember Blonigen suggested
that our committee look at increasing the minimum requirements
for recycling since we have added the opportunity for another
material to be recycled. The Monticello Recycling Committee,
therefore, met on Wednesday, February 6, to discuss the
possibility of increasing the minimum requirements for
recycling. After lengthy discussion concerning the pro's and
con's of increasing the requirements from six to nine, the
committee voted unanimously to increase the points required
from a minimum of six to nine per quarter effective April 1,
1991. It was felt that the current minimum levels were easily
met with the existing materials and that a strong emphasis
should be put on recycling of the plastics. It was felt the
current system, which grants exemptions to those for reasons
of health, travel, or non -waste generation, is satisfactory to
cover those individuals who cannot meet the existing minimums
or the increased minimum requirement. It was further felt
that because of the expected increases in the cost of the
disposal and the increasing environmental concerns, it was
necessary to recover as much recyclable material as possible
to achieve the greatest degree of landfill abatement.
It should be noted that we currently do not have the
capability in our computer system to track plastic separately,
and credit is currently given for plastic when only two other
materials are at curb side. In addition, the minimum points
required in the computer remain at six. We will be
researching the possibility of tracking plastics separately
with the computer through either one of the existing messaging
capabilities already in place or through a small modification
to the program. If the modifications are expensive, we may
stay with the minimum requirement of six points in the
computer; but the public would perceive the need to recycle at
least nine products per quarter, and this may have the same
overall effect to increase the amount of materials recycled.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to modify the recycling
plan to require a minimum of nine materials per quarter
to bo recycled for the maximum credit as allowed by
Title 7, Chapter 6, Section 9, paragraph (C), of the
Monticello City Ordinance effective April 1, 1991, as
recommended by the Monticello Recycling Committee.
2. The second alternative would be to make no changes in the
minimum requirements at this time.
Council Agenda - 2/11/91
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Monticello Recycling Committee
consisting of Councilmember, Dan Blonigen; City Administrator,
Rick Wolfsteller; Assistant Administrator, Jeff O'Neill;
Building Official, Gary Anderson; Secretary, Cathy Shuman, and
myself, in charge of the computer system, that the City
Council increase the minimum requirements for the recycling
program as outlined in alternative C1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copies of the Monticello Recycling Program data from July 1989
through December 1990.
t
sof
12
CITY OF MONTICELLO
C
RECYCLING
SUMMARY
Oct through December 1990
1,900
Households,
Est. Pop.
4,919
MONTHLY TONS RECYCLED
Material
OCT
NOV
DEC
Total For 3 Months
Glass
5.07
6.00
8.15
19.22
Cans
2.08
1.63
0.60
4.31
Newspaper
20.85
19.80
30.27
70.92
Cardboard
0.90
1.10
1.65
3.65
Lead Batteries
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.05
Plastics
0.08
0.03
0.00
0.11
TOTALS
29.00
28.57
40.69
98.26 TOTAL TONS
Pounds/
30.53
30.07
42.83
34.29 AVE. LBS.
Household/
Month
Total or Averaqe
Tons MSW
150.00
140.94
143.45
4 34. 39 TOTAL TONS
Landfillod
Cubic Yds
448.00
414.00
462.00
1,324.00 TL. CU.YDS.
Landfilled
8 Total
16.20
16.90
22.10
18.40% AVERAGE
Waste
Recycled
by Weight
Ave. Monthly
77.30
47.50
70.45
65.08% AVERAGE
Participation
MONTHLY
Rate
Tons Elig.
28.98
28.56
40.67
98.21 TOTAL TONS
for County
Incontivo
Funding
c
11
CITY OF MONTICELLO
RECYCLING SUMMARY
July through September 1990
1,900 Households, Est. Pop. 4,919
MONTHLY TONS RECYCLED
Material
JULY
AUG
SEPT
Total For 3 Months
Glass
6.85
9.76
7.30
23.91
Cans
2.27
3.31
2.74
8.32
Newspaper
26.00
34.01
22.74
82.75
Cardboard
0,60
1.37
1.00
2.97
Lead Batteries
0.07
0.04
0.02
0.13
Plastics
0.01
0.07
0.06
0.14
TOTALS
35.80
48.56
33.86
118.22 TOTAL TONS
Pounds/
37.68
51.12
35.64
41.48 AVE. LBS.
Household/
Month
Total or Avereoe
Tons MSW
149.98
150.71
129.55
430.24 TOTAL TONS
Landfilled
Cubic Yds
396.5
395
350
1,141.5 TL, CU. YDS.
Landfilled
% Total
19.3
24.4
20.7
21.5.1 AVERAGE
Waste
Recycled
by Weight
Ave. Monthly
74.40
77.57
74.95
75.641 AVERAGE
Participation
MONTHLY
Rate
Tons Elig.
35.73
48.52
33.84
118.09 TOTAL TONS
for County
Incontiv e
Funding
i
f
CITY OF MONTICELLO
RECYCLING
SUMMARY
April through
June 1990
1,889
Households,
Est. Pop. 4,458
MONTHLY TONS
RECYCLED
Material
April
May
June Total
For 3 Months
Glass
9.22
9.38
8.78
27.38
Cans
3.55
3.46
3.27
10.28
Newspaper
32.65
36.90
33.95
103.50
Cardboard
0.60
0.84
1.19
2.63
Lead Batteries 0.00
0.00
0.22
0.22
TOTALS
46.02
50.58
47.41
144.01 TOTAL TONS
Pounds/
48.72
53.55
50.20
50.82 AVE. LBS.
Household/
Month
Tons MSW 136.68 144.75 137.09
Landfilled
Cubic Yds 418 414 364
Landfilled
i Total 25.2 25.9 25.7
Waste
Recycled
by Weight
Ave. Monthly 76.31
Participation
Rate
Tons Elig. 35.12
for County
Incentive
Funding
C
Total or Averaqe
410.52 TONS
1,196 CUBIC YARDS
25.6!
77.52 78.27 77.4
39.21 36.94 111.27
• NOTE : Based upon 7 opportusiiL-ies
t
CITY OF MONTICELLO
RECYCLING
SUMMARY
January throuyli March 1990
1,084
households,
Est. Pop.
4,44B
MONTHLY TONS
RECYCLED
Material
January
February
March
Total For 3 Months
Glass
8.59
7.10
12.31
20.00
Cans
3.04
3.00
5.01
11.05
Newspaper
32.13
31.50
47.00
110.71
Cardboard
0.59
0.36
0069
1.64
TOTALS
44.35
Ti . 96
65.09
151.40 TOTAL TUNS
Pounds/,
47.U0
44.54
69.10
53.57 AVE. LOS.
Rousehoid/
Month
Total or Average
Tons MSW
123.17
96.57
131.05
351.59 TONS
Landfilled
Cubic Yds
307
300
306
1
1,073 CUBIC YARDS
Landfilled
Total
26.5
30.3
33.1
29.9'2
Waste
Recycled
by Weight
Ave. Monthly
70.75
64.45
72.40
69.76
Participation
RoLe
• NOTE : Based upon 7 opportusiiL-ies
t
CITY OF MONTICEI.LO
RECYCLING SUMMARY
JULY THROUGH DECEMBER 1989
1,881 Households, estimated population 4,440
MONTHLY TONS RDCYCLM
Total
For
Material
July
August
September
October
November
December
6 Mos.
Class
8.39
12.14
7.71
7.99
8.00
8.35
52.58
Cans
3.44
3.42
2.03
1.73
1.51
1.97
14.10
Newspaper
33.56
41.40
29.86
29.45
--39717
29.40
29.35
193.02
Subtotal
45.39
597
3�0
38.9T
39.67
259.70
Aux. Materials
Car Batteries
0.29
0
0
0
0
0
0.2Q
Cardboard
0.41
9.77
0.65
0.63
0.45
0.40
3.31
Total Tons Recycled
40
57.73
4�
3�0
-T9-.37 .
40.07
263.30
••••••••••••••••••.•••.•••.••............
•••.•••.•...••......... ••••••••..•.................................
......•.....•.
Tons MM SW
192.69
154.2
131.72
141.66
119.03
108.97
848.27
Landfilled
Cubic Yards
489.00
386.7
342.00
426.00
338.00
377.75
2,359.45
% Total waste
19.3%
27.2%
23.4%
21.9%
24.91
26.9%
23.9% ave.
Recyclod by weight
Average Monthly
67.0%
72.2%
72.6%
69.91
59.81
55.6%
66.2%
Participation Rato
Council Agenda - 2/11/91
9. Consideration of 1991 Fourth Annual Junk Amnesty Day. (J.S.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The 1990 Junk Amnesty Day, held on Saturday, May 19, was a big
success even though it rained off and on all during the
collection. Two hundred thirty-six (236) households took
advantage of the program and brought their recyclable and
unwanted household items to the amnesty day program held at
the commuter parking lot. Three paid City employees, four
volunteer City employees, and one volunteer citizen worked the
collection, as well as Polka Dot Recycling, Ruff Auto Parts,
and Appliance Recycling Center of America. In all, over
50,000 pounds of materials were recycled, and 180 cubic yards
of unwanted household goods were properly disposed of.
Judging from the condition of many of the household goods,
including the appliances, they had been sitting outside behind
the house or behind the garage for quite some time prior to
being brought to the collection.
The total cost of last year's program was $4,216.15. A copy
of the summary of the program and individual item costs is
enclosed for your review. In preparation for the 1991 Fourth
Annual Junk Amnesty Day, we placed an amount of $4,000 in the
1991 budget. City staff recommends that the 1991 collection
be hold on May 4. We have contacted Demcon Disposal for the
roll -off containers and landfill disposal, and Appliance
Recycling Centers of America concerning pickup of Lhe
appliances. Both firms indicated they would be available for
the May 4 date. Upon confirmation from the City Council, we
will arrange for recyclists to handle the scrap metals and
oil.
B. ALTERNATIVE. ACTIONS:
1. Authorize City staff to hold a 1991 Junk Amnesty Day on
May 4, 1991, at an estimated cost of $4,000.
2. The second alternative would be not to have a Junk
Amnesty Day this year or reschedule it for another date.
Rescheduling does not appear to be very practical, as
fishing season opens May 11, and the Saturday preceding
the 4th is expectod to be the Wright County Hazardous
Household Waste Collection Day.
3. The third alternative would be to authorize Junk Amnosty
Day for May 4 but to also consider a fall cleanup day.
13
c
Council Agenda - 2/11/91
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the staff recommendation that the City Council authorize
the 1991 Junk Amnesty Day for May 4, 1991, as outlined in
alternative 91 at an estimated cost of $4,000. We will
continue to look at methods to control costs and limit usage
to city residents. Junk amnesty days or cleanup days are
catching on all across the county. As you may know, Otsego
Township and Big Lake Township held their first cleanup days
last year. More and more cities and townships are becoming
involved in annual cleanup days. I have an opportunity to
address a group of county -wide cities and townships regarding
annual cleanup days on February 19. We are still hoping that
Monticello Township will also be involved with such a program,
as it would limit the number of township residents we have to
turn away from our program. They did not respond to my letter
of 1990 written at Council request (a copy is enclosed).
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the summary of the 1990 Junk Amnesty Day; Copy of 1990
letter to township; Copy of 1990 advertisement.
14
r SUMMARY
CITY OF MONTICELLO
1990 "JUNK AMNESTY DAY"
Date Held: May 19, 1990
Public Hours: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
Paid Workers: 3
Volunteers: 5
City Equipment Used:
1 rubber -tire loader
1 pickup truck
2 single axle dump trucks (overflow of appliances)
40 traffic cones
Households Served: 236 (138 of city households)
Recyclers: Polka Dot (Buffalo), Ruff Auto (Monticello),
Appliance Recycling Center of America (Mpls)
LItems Recycled:
A. 194 household appliances (33,000 pounds)
B. 12,000 pounds of scrap iron and metal
C. 775 pounds of scrap aluminum
D. 3,320 pounds of vehicle lead batteries
E. 1,960 pounds or 280 gallons of used motor oil
F. Total: 51,055 pounds or 25.5 tons
Household Goods Disposed Of:
A. 180 cu yds of furniture, carpet, console tv's
B. 43 mattresses
Cost: Labor $ 498.15
Advertising 165.00
Appliance pickup (Saturday) 1,358.00
Household goods disposal 2,195.00
$4,216.15
09
PUBLIC NOTICE
"JUNK AMNESTY DAY"
The City of Monticello will accept and dispose of unwanted
household goods on Saturday, May 19, 1990.
PROGRAM PURPOSE
To improve quality of Monticello neighborhoods and our environment
by encouraging proper disposal of materials that otherwise can
become a public nuisance.
To reduce demands on landfill through recycling of eligible
materials.
To provide the elderly and handicapped with assistance in disposing
of unwanted household items.
PROGRAM OUTLINE
Materials eliglble (as outs lned below) must be delivered to the
west end of the commuter parking lot between the hours of 9:00 AM
and 4:00 PM, Saturday, May 19, 1990. Senior citizens and Lho
physically handicapped that need assistance should call City Ilnll
at 295-2711 to schedule volunteers for pickup of unwanted
materials.
NOTE: No hazardous wastes or car tires will be accepted.
Program limited to city of Monticello residents only. Proof of
residency required.
ELIGIBLE MATERIALS
The following is a list of typical household materials that will be
accepted and disposed of or recycled. All other material,
including commercial wastes, will not be accepted.
SCRAP IRON, MOTOR OIL, ANTI -FREEZE, CAR BATTERIES
CAR WHEELS (nor, tl,ren) , AND OTTIER IRON CAR PARTS
HOUSEHOLD GOODS SUCH AS CARPL•'T, FURNITURE, MATTRESSES,
AND SMALL APPLIANCES
LARGE APPLIANCES ACCEPTED (rofrig, dryer, otc.) -
LIMIT 3 PER IIOUSEIIOLD
POLKA DOT RECYCLING WILL PAY FOR SCRAP ALUMINUM/
BEV CANS
VOLUNTEERS ARE NEEDED
Individuals Interested In helping on Saturday or in assisting the
C elderly and handibapped with transporting materials to the drop-off
site can call City Nall for assignments - 295-2711.
oueations regarding this program can be answered by Jeff O'Nel.11 -
295-2711.
n
it
May 30, 1990
AtOM10ELLO
Z50 East Broadway
Monticelb). MN 55362-9245
Phone: (612) 2952711
Metro: (612) 333.5739
Mr. Franklin Denn
Chairperson
Monticello Township
Route 3, Box 253
Monticello, MN 55362
Re: Junk Amnesty Clean-up Day
Dear Mr. Denn:
For the past three years, the City of Monticello has held a junk
amnesty or clean-up day in late May or early June. The purpose of
the program is to clean up and recycle unwanted household Items
which are usually difficult for residents to dispose of and often
pile up behind houses or garages or out buildings. The City of
Monticello accepts furniture, carpeting, scrap iron, appliances,
and the like free of charge to the homeowner.
The City advertises Its clean-up day wall in advance through radlo
announcements and ads in the local papers. Because of the time
constraints and cost of the program, the City must limit it to city
residents only, and the ads clearly state this. Each year,
however, we find ourselves turning away many township residents.
This year, on May 19, we found it necessary to turn away 15
Monticello Township residents who brought in pickup and truck loads
of unwanted household goods. All of these Individuals had a
Monticello mailing address but wore, however, township residents.
One of the individuals was Mr. Dan Erickson of Monticello Township,
'and he could not understand why the City of Monticello was not
Including township residents In its program. We did ask
Mr. Erickson to contact the township board and express his views
directly to you. we have also suggested that other individuals who
were turned away from our program call the township and express
their concerns for the need for such a program.
r9)
Mr. Franklin Denn
( May 30, 1990
`- Page 2
If you or any members of the township board or other concerned
citizens would be interested In obtaining Information about our
program or the program recently established in Otsego Township, I
would be more than willing to provide that data to you. In
addition, I would volunteer my time and efforts to assist the
township in setting up such a program If they so desire. If you
have any questions, or if we may be of any assistance in this
matter, please contact us.
Respectfully,
CITY QF MONTIC LLO
?John�E. Simola
Public Works Director
JES/kd
cc: Mayor and Council Members
JS ✓
File
C
v
Council Agenda - 2/11/91
10. Consideration of purchase of micro -computer for use by
Economic Development Director. (J.O.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
City Council is asked to consider purchase of a micro -computer
with emulation for use by the Economic Development Director.
The purpose of the computer is to increase efficiency and
improve written presentations through the application of word
processing and electronic spreadsheet applications. No new
printer is needed, as the laser jet printer would be used for
output through the use of the emulation hardware.
In her role as Economic Development Director, 011ie Koropchak
prepares agendas and meeting minutes for the HRA, IDC, Chamber
of Commerce, and the EDA. She types almost all of her own
correspondence. Much of her correspondence consists of form
letters that are more efficiently and professionally prepared
when done on word processing.
As an important secondary benefit, the electronic spreadsheet
could be used to assist with development of finance plans.
In December of 1989, the City Council adopted a computer
development plan which included placement of a micro -computer
in the office of the Economic Development Director. At that
time, tho plan was to provide a Wang personal computer that
was displaced by the new computer purchases. Unfortunately,
this was not practical, as the new word processing package
(Word Perfect) utilized by the new computers would not operate
on the Wang system as previously expected. In response to
this situation, tho extra Wang computer was transferred to the
Public Works Department where it is being used for electronic
spreadsheet applications. Staff then placed the purchase of
an IBM-compatible computer into the 1991 budget.
Budqot Impact
A total of $2,500 was placed in the budget for this item.
City staff has received quotes for IBM equipment PC's and for
IBM compatible PC's. Most of the quotes received aro under
budget. Prices range from $1,843 for the cheapest IBM
compatible to $2,807 for IBM equipment offered through the
State of Minnesota contract. It is our view that purchase of
a cheaper IBM-compatible merits serious consideration,
especially if it can be covered under a maintenance agreement.
15
c
Council Agenda - 2/11/91
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to authorize staff to purchase a micro -computer
for use by the Economic Development Director at a cost
not to exceed $2,500.
Staff Is not prepared to make a specific recommendation
regarding which PC to buy at this time because warranty
and maintenance agreement information is not complete.
If Council agrees that the purchase should be made, staff
requests the latitude to select which PC to buy once all
of our research is complete.
2. Motion to deny authorization to purchase micro -computer
for use by the Economic Development Director.
This option should be selected if Council does not agree
that operation of word processing will result in added
efficiency sufficient to offset the cost of the micro-
computer.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is staff's view that the addition of the micro -computer and
associated word processing as proposed can be justified by the
added efficiency that will result. Staff, therefore,
recommends alternative Y1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Quotes and technical data.
16
MICRO -Cr "OUTER QUOTES
1
COMPANY/BRAND
QUOTE
ADVANTAGES
DISADVANTAGES
MAINT. AVAILABILITY
(includes emulation)
NCR (Modern Computer)
$2,406
5 yr parts and
Extra 5480/yr on-site
Supported by:
MCS PC286
labor warranty
service or take in
CPS, Inc.
for service
wyBrite
$2,190
Refurbished PC
Supported by:
IBM PS/2 Model 30
Only 90 -day warranty
all vendors
(Slower processor,
smaller disk Storage)
Northgale
$2,057
Free technical
'Need to verity
Supported by:
Slim Line 286-12
support available
Compatibility with
CPS. Inc.
5250 emulation
Memorex -Telex
$2,058
t yr parts and
Must be taken in
Supported by:
7025
labor warranty
for service
Decision Data
Decision Data
$2,678
1 w on-slte
Supported by:
DDCC 5054
parts 8 labor
Decision Data
warranty
Ultimata PC
61,843
1 yr parts and
Must be taken In
Supported by:
CAF 286112
labor warranty
for service
CPS, Inc.
Guaranteed
compatibility
with 5250
emulation
AmoriData
62,807
90 -day pans 6 labor-
Supported by:
(State contract)
Costs exile
all vendors
IBM PS/2 Model 30
AmerlData
62,628
Guaranteed
90 -day parts 8 labor-
Supported by:
NEC
compatibility
Costs extra
AmeriData
with IBM 5250
emulation
Council Agenda - 2/11/91
11. Consideration of purchasinq personal accident insurance
coverage for Council members. (R.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Currently, the City of Monticello is providing workman's
compensation insurance coverage for the Mayor and Council
members. This option was available to the City, and a couple
of years ago we chose to include this coverage as part of our
policy. The current minimum premium amounts to $610 per year
for covering the five Council members.
The League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust does have
available an accident policy for members of city councils and
other boards and committees that provides a lower cost
alternative to worker's compensation coverage. The accident
coverage applies while the individual is traveling to or from
a committee meeting or while conducting other official
business on behalf of the City. The coverage provides
$100,000 accidental death benefit and a $400 per week short-
term benefit for total disability. Some communities have
opted for this type of coverage in lieu of the higher premium
cost for worker's compensation coverage. Naturally, the
benefits are not equal, and it is only brought to the
Council's attention if they desire to change from our present
worker's compensation coverage.
The cost of the accident coverage is $12.75 per person per
year compared to the $122 per person per year. Open
enrollment can only occur during the month of February; and if
the Council would like to drop worker's compensation coverage
and convert to the individual accident policy, it should be
done at this time.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Council could elect to drop worker's compensation
coverage for Council members and select a personal
accident insurance coverage instead.
2. Remain with worker's compensation coverage.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This same information was brought to the Council's attention
last year, and it was the consensus of the Council that the
City would remain with worker's componsation coverage for
Council members. The potential benefits are much greater from
worker's compensation versus the individual accident policy in
17
Council Agenda - 2/11/91
that worker's compensation would also cover medical expenses,
rehabilitation expenditures, and other benefits even though
the cost is substantially higher. The staff has no
recommendation on changing coverage at this time.
SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of League memo and policy information.
L�
M
Is
I �v
STS
I - -
League of Minnesota Cities
January 22, 1991
To: City officials
From: Peter Tritz
183 University Ave. East
St. Paul, MN 55101.2526
(612)227.5600(FAX: 221-0986)
ENROLLMENT WILL BE OPEN DURING THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY FOR LMCIT'S
ACCIDENT POLICY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCILS AND OTHER CITY
BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS.
This accident coverage is provided by CIGNA, and provides a
lower-cost alternative to workers compensation coverage. By
statute, elected officials and officers appointed for a fixed
term of office are covered by workers compensation only if the
city has passed an ordinance or resolution to that effect.
The accident coverage applies while the individual is traveling
to or from a committee meeting, or while conducting other
official business on behalf of and at the request of the
committee. The coverage provides a $100,000 accidental death
benefit and a $400/week short-term benefit for total disability.
While this accident policy was developed as a lower-cost
alternative to providing workers compensation coverage, it is
Important to understand that the benefits are not equivalent to
those of workers compensation. Some of the differences are that
it does not include medical, rehabilitation, or retraining
benefits; disability and death benefits are fixed, rather than
being based on the individual's actual oarnings; disability
benefits are paid only for total disability, and for a maximum of
26 weeks; and the accident policy disability benefits may be
taxable income to the individual.
Tile city may provide coverage for any city boards, commissions,
or committees it designates. However, all members of the
respective board or commission must be covered; that is, the
coverage cannot be offered on an individual choice basis.
The cost of the accident coverage is $12.75 par person par year.
(By comparison, LMC1T's current minimum rate for workers
compensation coverage for council members to $122 per parson par
year.) The accident policy coverage year runs March 1 to
February 28.
Additional information and application forms are enclosed. For
C questions concerning the coverage or to put'coverago into, affect.
contact Jaime Frischmann, The Brehm Group, 706 Second Avenue
South, Suite 750, Minneapolis, MN 55402; (612) 339-7785.
nl
Deaf Member City
The League of Minnesota Cities is pleased to offer
through 7 C. Field and Company and Life Insurance
Company of North America, an Accidomal Death B
Dismemberment and Short Term Disability bench: for
vour city council members, and selected Committee.
Commission or Board members. This insurance covers
all eligible council members while they are traveling 10.
ponippa ring in, or traveling from a regular or special
meeting of the council Or other city board. commission,
or conirmitloe of which the individual is a member, or
while conducting official council business on behalf.
and at the request of rho council. Covorage begins at
the start of a trip, whether from their Wind. OtiCe Of
other location, and ends upon thea return to their home
or office- or makes a personal deviation. "Personal
deviation ", as used hero, moans an acGwty that is not
necessartl)' related to their business, and no: incidental
to rho business trip
ELIGIBILITY
All active Minnesota Municipal Council mOMDers whOse
municipality has elected to participate in this program
and all rnomoors of City of Municipal Cbmmlhees.
Commissions and Boards for wham rho Municipality
has app liod for coverage.
THE BENEFIT
Accidental Death 6 Dismemberment
It oddity injuries result in death or dismemberment
within one year of a covered accident, the plan will pay
as 10110.5:
Loss of Life .................... .......... S700,000 -
Loss of two or
more members ........................... S100.0001
Loss of one
member . . ............................... S50.000'
Loss of thumb and index
linger of the same hand .................... S25.000 -
"Member "
25.000 -"Member" moons hand, toot or eye,
only one arraunt, the largest t0 which you are entitled,
will be paid for all losses resulting from One accident.
'il you are ago 70 or over of the time you sustain injuries
in a covered accident, your Principal Sum reduces to
65% of the original amount: at ago 75, to 45%; at ago
80. to 3096: and Otago 85.10 150
Total Disabilay Weakly Benefit
It, within 30 days OI rho date of a covered occident. an
insured t)OCOhles totally disabled as a direct result of
injuries sustained. and from no other cause, the Plan will
pay $400.00 par weak, following a 3 -day waiting period.
tar up to 26 weeks, or until such time as a benefit
becomes payable lot loss of life, limb Or sight.
Exposure and DisabOoomnco
If the body of on Insurod has nor boon found within Ono
year of rho disappodranco. stranding, sinking or
wracking of any vehicle in which rho Insured was on
occupant, than it shell be presumed, subject t0 all other
provisions and Conditions of rho policy that rho Insurod
has sullorod loss of bre Covered under rho policy.
EXCLUSIONS
No coverage is provided for loss cue to,
a) Suicide. attempted suicide. or intentionally self.
mfircteo injuries.
b) war or any act Of war,
C) Full-time service in tyre armed forces.
d) Taking part in a telon}r.
o) Travel or flignt in any aircraft while being used for
on), testing or experimental purposes, fire fighting,
pipe. or power -Imo inspection, aerial photography or
exploration: or One operated by rho insured, a
member of their household, the Municipality or any
Municipality or affiliate: or in military aircraft other
than transport aircraft operated by the Military Airlift
Command (MAC) or similar service of another
country: or whilo serving as a pilot or other crow
member of any aircraft.
Please fill out the enclosed enrollment form, and send it
along, with the first annual premium, calculated as
strewn, All checks should Car made payable to. and
mailed to:
The Brohm Group
706 Second Avonue South
Suite 700
Minneapolis, MN 55402
This brochurd rs Intando0 as a brief benefit description.
The Policy will oeformino trio benefit payable.
Council Agenda - 2/11/91
12. Report on City Attorney selection process; consideration of
establishing date and time for interviews. (J.O.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
As of meeting time, nine individual attorneys and firms will
have participated in a screening interview conducted by City
staff, Shirley Anderson, and Clint Herbst. It is likely that
this group will have made a decision regarding the final three
candidates by meeting time. Council is asked to establish a
date and time for a special meeting at which time the
finalists will be interviewed. Prior to the interview, City
staff will be conducting an extensive reference check and will
be copying to you all application materials submitted by the
finalists. If you should have any questions regarding the
City Attorney selection process, status, etc., please give me
a call.
19
INFORMATION ITEM
FEBRUARY 6, 1991
Report on City Challenqe to Preliminary Census Fiqures. (J.0.)
You may have heard that the Census Bureau released final census
figures. This is to inform you that the final census figure for
the city of Monticello has not yet been established, as the recent
challenge to the census housing count is still under consideration
by the Census Bureau.
The preliminary results of the challenge to the census figures
resulted in a net increase in city population of 22 people from
4,919 to 4,941. The preliminary numbers do not include the 30
housing unite that were mistakenly allocated to the Monticello
Township. I have been informed by Pat Heeland, an attorney for the
Census Bureau, that the 30 housing units mistakenly placed in the
township population totals will be allocated to the city of
Monticello after completion of a formal review process which is now
under development. It is estimated that the population will
increase by approximately 75 people once the 30 units are placed in
the proper jurisdiction, which will result in an estimated
population count of 5,014.
I will update you again on this matter as soon as new information
is forthcoming.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Monthly Building Department Report
Month of January
, 19 91
PERIIITS A11D USES
`I
Thn -
Sema Montt, Leet
Year
Tl,le Yeer
PERMITS ISSUED
Month December Month Jenuery
Leat Year To
Data
'fo Bele
RESIUEJ+t'IAL
uumbor
3 2
3
3
a
va lua tion
5 16,900.00 5 7,000.00
9 70,000.00 5
70,000.00
5 7,000.00
Fees
185.60 30.00
665.69
665.69
30.00
Surcharges
8.20 1.00
75.00
35.00
1.00
LUMMF.RCIAL
Num6.r
4 2
1
1
2
Va lue tion
23,000.00 20,000.00
5,500.00
5,500.00
20,000.00
Fea.
T.00 212.00
76.50
76.50
212.00
.,urchargoa
11.25 10.00
2.75
2.75
10.00
111UUSTn 1 AL
Number
1
II
Valuation
200,000.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
Fe..
989.50
30.00
30.00
Surcharges
100.00
1.50
1.50
PwMnII1C
Number
2 1
1
1
1
Feea
62.00 22.00
20.00
20.00
22.00
Surcharges
1.00 .50
.50
.50
.50
OTIIE05
Number
v. luntlou
Fee.
Surcharges
TOTAL 110. PRRMITS
10 5
6
6
u
TOTAL VALUATION
239,900.00 23,000.00
78,500.00
78,500.00
23,000.00
TOTAL FEES
1,401.10 264.00
792.19
792.19
264.00
TOTAL SURCIIAnGFS
120.45 11.50
79.75
39.75
11.50
CURRENT MUNTII
• FERB
Num1..1
to halo
pr.nm IT 11 ATNn F.
Nmeber vEn MIT OUIIL7IARCR Valuation
3h la yn el
last veer
Oingl. Family
8 9
5
0
I
n,ples
0
0
Mulll-lest ly
0a
cases rnl.l
0
0
Induatll.l
0
0
n... cele...
0
0
BIVna
0
0
Pub 110 nut I Inge
0
0
ALTCnATI011 C,Il REPAIR
o..11
2 30.00 1.00
3,000.00
2
2
Comm n rale)
2 212.00 10.00
20,000.00
7
1
Indual,lel
0
1
pLIIMnINO
A11 Typ..
1 22.00 .50
1
1
ALCrII RY OTRUCTVRED
a.Ims l ng pool.
0
0
Mak.
0
0
TEMpon ARY PPAMIT
0
O
OFMIATION
0
0
(
TOTA1.9
5 204.00 11.50
23,000.00
5
6
INDIVIDUAL PERMIT ACTIVITY REPORT
Month of January , 1991
PERMIT
DESCRIPIIO.Y
TYPE
NAME/7ACATION
VALUATION
Ry..
NUMBER
PERMIT
6URCHARGE PLUMBING
SURCHARGE
91-tG27
Intorlor
Ramo0ol
AC
Paula H. L. 9Dlkar/141 L. BroaCvay, Sta. 5
5 5,000.00
9 50.00
3 7.50
91-1624
B�4ameIt
Plnlah
AD
Brant G KarenHalnle/2761 0 kvlev W.
1,500.00
15.00
.50
91-1627
DRaamant
PSnlah
AD
JGhn 6 Daborah Johnaort/14 Pa lr-y Dr.
1,500.00
15.00
.50
91-1626
Intorlor
Ra.ad .1
AC
Monticall o-Bly Lake Co—Ity C11nIc
15,000.00
162.00
7.50 322.00
5 .50
1107 Hart 01v4. TOTALS
327,000.00
3242.00
$11.00 522.00
5 .50
PLAN REVIEW
TOTAL PLAN REVIEW 500.00
TOTAL REVENUE $275.50
(thru01/31/91)
BUILDING
PERMITS
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
Single Family Permits
Number
40
50
35
26
23
27
0
Valuation
$2,166,800
$2,952,400
$2,210,200
$1,695.100
$1,503,400
$1,501,600
$0
Two Family Permits
Number
5
12
2
1
0
0
0
Valuation
$416,900
$1,025,100
$229,100
$86,000
SO
$0
$0
4 -unit Apartment Permits
Number
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
Valuation
$173,900
$144,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
6 -unit Apartment Permits
Number
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
Valuation
$0
$0
$0
$370,800
$0
$0
$0
6 -unit Townhouse Permits
Number
2
1
1
0
1
0
0
Valuation
$523.400
$249,700
$307,300
$0
$384,800
$0
$0
8 -unit Townhouse Permits
Number
1
1
0
2
0
0
0
Valuation
$408,200
$459,700
00
$1,232,200
$0
$0
$0
8 -unit Apartment Permits
Number
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
Valuation
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$249.300
$0
12 -unit Apartment Permits
Number
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
Valuation
$460,000
$416,400
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
1985
1986
1987
19886
1989
1990
1991
16 -unit Apartment Permits
Number
0
0
O
2
0
0
0
Valuation
$0
$0
SO
$988.800
$0
$0
$0
18 -unit Apartment Permits
Number
1
0
O
0
0
0
0
Valuation
$735.900
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
24 -unit Apartment Permits
Number
I
1
1
0
0
0
0
Valuation
$737.500
$747,000
$678,200
$0
$0
$0
$0
26 -unit Apartment Permits
Number
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
Valuation
$0
$839,200
s0
$0
$0
50
$0
28 -unit Apartment Permits
Number
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
Valuation
50
$0
$0
$0
$693,700
50
$0
30 -unit Apartment Permits
Number
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Valuation
50
$0
$856,400
50
$0
50
$0
31 -unit Apartment Permits
Number
0
t
0
0
0
0
0
Valuation
50
$973,700
s0
50
50
50
$0
Residential Garage Permits
Number
15
11
12
14
7
9
0
Valuation
$81.500
$43,500
s70,3O0
$90,200
$45.600
$40,000
50
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
Commercial Permits
Number
10
7
4
7
1
7
0
Valuation
$3,804,500
$2,175,200
$110,000
$454,500
$225,000
$2,629,800
$0
Industrial Permits
Number
0
2
2
2
0
4
0
Valuation
$0
$145,500
$1,242,700
$9,200
$O
$1,348,700
$0
Residential Addition/
Remodel Permits
Number
28
52
58
71
74
102
2
Valuation
$146,970
$275,350
$371,500
$379,400
$248,800
$442,000
$3,000.00
Commercial Addition/
Remodel Permits
Number
17
17
21
27
25
28
2
Valuation
$370,160
$1,804,730
$673,130
$862,400
$1,522,900
$517,500
$20,000
Industrial Addition/
Remodel Permits
Number
0
2
1
1
0
6
0
Valuation
$0
$625.000
$12,100
$1,500
$O
$1,711,600
$0
Total Building Permits
Number
78
90
58
56
32
48
0
Valuation
$9.508,600
$10,171,400
$5,701,600
$4,928,800
$2,852,500
$5,769,400
$0
Total Addition/
Remodel Permits
Number
45
71
80
99
101
136
4
Valuation
6517,130
$2,705.080
$1,075,230
$1,243,300
$1,854,800
$2,871,100
$23,000
Total Permits
Number
123
161
138
155
134
184
4
Valuation
$10,025,730
$12,878,480
$8,776.830
$6,170,100
$4,754,400
$8,440.500
$23,000
EMPLOYEE/DEPT.
GARY ANDERSON
BLDG. INSP.
OLLIE KOROPCHAK
ECONOMIC DEV.
JEFF O'NEILL
ADMIN.
IMARLENE HELLMAN
FINANCE
CATHY SHUMAN
UTIL. BILLING
KAREN DOTY
ADMIN.
DIANE JACOBSON
DEPUTY REG.
WANDA KRAEMER
UTIL. BILLING
IPAT KOVICH
DEPUTY REG.
TOTALS
BUIL',!G INSPECTION DEPARTMENT
1988 DODGE CARAVAN MONTHLY REPORT
JANUARY 18, 1991, TO FEBRUARY 9, 1991
DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 11, 1991
1/18 1/22
1123
1/24
1/25 1128 1/29 1/30 1131 2/1
2/4 2/5
216
217
218
2/9 TOTAL
5:15 2:00
1:15
1:15
3:30 1:45
1:45
1:45
1:15
1:00 20:45
1:00
2:30
3:30
1:00
1:00
0:15
0:15
1:00
1:00
0:15
0:30
0:30
1:15
0:15
0:15
0:15
0:20
0:15
0:15
0:15
0:15
2:05
2:15
2:15
0:00
5:15 2:00
1:30
1:30
0:15 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:00 0:35
3:30 2:15
4:00
4:45
5:30
1:00 32:05
Boginning Mlloogo: 34,384.0
Ending Miloogo: 34,628.2
Total Milos: 244.2
1 1.3 gallons gasolino: $18.00, 21.6 mpg
2 Car washos: $4.75 each a $9.50