City Council Agenda Packet 07-08-1991AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Monday, July 8, 1991 - 7:00 p.m.
Mayor: Ken Maus
Council Members: Shirley Anderson, Dan Blonigen, Brad Fyle,
Clint Herbst
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held June 24, 1991.
3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints.
4. Consideration of reviewing the Economic Development
Authority's (EDA) approval of Greater Monticello Enterprise
Fund (GNEF) Loan No. 003 for Aroplax Corporation.
5. Consideration of adopting a resolution calling for a public
hearing on the proposed modification by the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Monticello of
the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1, the
modification of the tax increment financing plans for Tax
Increment Financing District Nos. 1-1 through 1-12, and the
n adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment
Financing District No. 1-13, all located within Redevelopment
Project No. 1.
6. Consideration of renewing animal services agreement --Patty
Salzwedel.
7. Consideration of proposal for architectural and engineering
services for developing long and short-range building
requirements and space needs for the public works department.
B. Consideration of expansion of City Hall parking lot.
9. Consideration of improvements or replacement of the
information center/museum/public restrooms.
10. Consideration of concurrence with Wright County to post "no
parking" along County Road 117 east of Highway 25.
11. Adjournment.
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, June 24, 1991 - 7:00 p.m.
Members Present: Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brad Fyle, Ken
Maus
Members Absent: Dan Blonigen
2. Approval of minutes.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and
seconded by Brad Fyle to approve the minutes of the regular
meeting held June 10, 1991. Motion carried unanimously.
3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints.
None forthcoming.
4. Public Hearino--Delinquent sewer and water accounts.
City Council reviewed the status of two delinquent utility
billing accounts. Both account holders requested a public
hearing with the Council to allow them to explain why they
have been unable to pay their account and why the City of
Monticello should not disconnect their water service.
With regard to the Tom Hass account, Hass informed Council
that he would like an exemption from participation in the
recycling program because he eats out all the time and he does
not produce recyclable waste.
Council also reviewed the James Collette delinquent utility
billing account. Mr. Collette indicated that he inherited the
high water bill from the individuals that were previously
occupying his home and that he is not able to pay the full
amount at this time.
After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded
by Clint Herbst to require that Tom Hass pay the sower and
water portion of the utility bill per the policy for late
payment of utility bills and to abate that portion of the
utility bill associated with failure to participate in the
recycling program. If payment is not forthcoming, the water
service should be disconnected immediately. Motion also
included that James Collette pay the utility bill as
calculated under the existing policy for payment of delinquent
accounts; however, Council elected to waive the lot service
charge and the recycling charge. Motion carried unanimously.
Pago 1
9
Council Minutes - 6/24/91
Consideration of approval of development agreement aoverninq
City/developer installed improvements --Briar Oakes Estate
Phase I.
Assistant City Administrator O'Neill reviewed the development
agreement with Council. After discussion, Council elected to
table the matter until after consideration of the resolution
approving plans and spec's and authorizing advertisement for
bids for Briar Oakes Estate, which is item 87 of this Council
agenda.
Consideration of approval of final plat, Phase I, Briar Oakes
Estate.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reviewed modifications made to
the preliminary plat, and they were incorporated into the
final plat. O'Neill noted that the Army Corps of Engineers
had given verbal approval of the phase I grading plan;
however, approval is contingent upon the removal of Lot 6,
Block 1, as a buildable lot. The Army Corps of Engineers
requested that this lot remain as a pond area and not be
filled.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and
seconded by Brad Fyle to approve the final plat subject to the
following:
1) Verification of title transfer of Outlet I from
Farm Credit to Prestige Builders;
2) City Engineer approval of the grading plan;
3) The development agreement must be executed, with
all financial securities provided and approved by
the City Attorney;
4) Two copies of the restrictive covenants must be
signed;
5) Walkway casement documentation must be prepared and
submitted to the City;
6) County surveyor's signature must be on the plat
prior to City signatures;
7) If Lot 6, Block 1, is deemed unbuildable by the
Army Corps of Engineers, a separate document must
be recorded against the lot indicating such. The
property associated with the unbuildable lot would
then be distributed to Lots 5 and 7, Block 1.
Motion carried unanimously.
Page 2
8
Council Minutes - 6/24/91
Consideration of a rezoning request to rezone Outlot I, Meadow
Oak subdivision, from R -PUD to R-1 zone. Applicant. Prestioe
Builders of St. Cloud.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill informed Council that in order
for the Briar Oakes Estate to be developed as proposed, the
original PUD zoning designation must be changed to the R-1
zoning designation.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and
seconded by Clint Herbst to approve rezoning Outlot I from PUD
to the R-1 zoning designation. Motion was based on the
finding that the Briar Oakes subdivision is designed to
sufficiently integrate with the adjoining PUD areas in terms
of street, sidewalk, and utilities design; the rezoning is
consistent with the comprehensive plan, geography, and
character of the area; and rezoning will allow development of
single family building lots which are in short supply at this
time. Motion carried unanimously.
8. Public Hearinq--Consideration of a resolution approving plans
and authorizfnq advertisement for bide --Briar Oakes Estate,
Project 91-2.
Mayor Maus opened the public hearing. Assistant City
Administrator O'Neill, along with City Engineer, Bret Weiss,
reviewed the sewer, water, street, and storm sewer
improvements associated with phase I of Briar Oakes Estate,
Project 91-2. O'Neill noted that the majority of the cost to
install public improvements associated with this project are
to be assessed against the Briar Oakes Estate plat; however,
a portion ($13,500) of the storm sewer cost associated with
this project could be distributed to other benefiting
properties.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and
seconded by Clint Herbst to approve a resolution approving
plans and authorizing advertisement for bids for Briar Oakes
Estate, Project 91-2, and to establish a tentative assessment
roll for the $13,500 storm sower improvement connecting the
southeast pond to the east pond. The assessment roll
incorporates the cost to provide the storm sower to benefiting
township properties and spreads this cost across properties in
the city benefiting from the improvement. Under this
assossmont program, Prostigo Builders pays 578 of the total,
or $7,700; Outlot J of Farm Credit pays 148 of the total, or
$1,900; Outlot L owned by Farm Credit pays 228, or $2,900; and
Pago 3
Council Minutes - 6/24/91
Outlot M of Farm Credit pays 7%, or $1,000. Voting in favor:
Shirley Anderson, Ken Maus, Clint Herbst. Opposed: Brad
Fyle. In voting against the motion, Brad Fyle supported the
approval of plans and spec's but did not agree with the
formula for distributing the $13,500 storm sewer expense.
SEE RESOLUTION 91-19.
City Council then addressed the development agreement
addressed in agenda item 05. After discussion, a motion was
made by Clint Herbst and seconded by Shirley Anderson to adopt
the development agreement as submitted by City staff and
amended by the City Attorney. In addition, the development
agreement should reflect the proposed storm water assessment
against the Prestige Builders property as identified in the
previous agenda item. Motion carried unanimously.
Consideration of a resolution approvinq plans and authorizing
advertisement for bids for Fallon Avenue and Cardinal Hills,
Improvement Proiects 91-1 and 91-3.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill informed Council that the
developer provided the City with a letter of credit in an
amount equal to the cont to prepare plans and specifications.
In turn, the City Engineer completed plans and specifications
associated with the Fallon Avenue improvement and phase I of
the Cardinal Hills improvement. O'Neill asked Council to
consider approving the plans and authorizing advertisement for
bids.
Prior to Council consideration of the matter, Kevin Schmitz of
Prestige Builders and Tom Holthaus and Matt Holker of Value
Plus development group indicated that they understand the risk
associated with bidding the Value Plus and Cardinal Hills
projects together in that if one of the projects drops out,
then the bid process for the remaining project will have to
start over, which will delay construction time by 45 days.
Both developers indicated they understand this risk and are
willing to accept it for the sake of obtaining lower bid
prices.
A motion was made by Shirley Anderson and Seconded by Brad
Fylo to adopt a resolution approving plans and authorizing
advertisement for bids for Fallon Avenue and Cardinal Hills,
Improvement Projects 91-1 and 91-3. Motion carried
unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 91-20.
Page 4
N
Council Minutes - 6/24/91
lo. Consideration of accepting the 1991 Audit Report for the City
of Monticello.
Rick Borden and Kim Lillehaug of Gruys Johnson reviewed the
audit report for the City of Monticello.
After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded
by Shirley Anderson to accept the 1991 Audit Report as
submitted. Motion carried unanimously.
11. Consideration of an offer to exchange land in lieu of
delinquent assessments, outlet A of Country Club Manor.
After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and
seconded by Brad Fyle to offer to release the balance of the
assessments against Outlet A if $300,000 of the existing
assessment debt is paid to the City. in addition:
1) Four acres of Outlet A must be transferred to the
City for use as a storm water retention area;
2) Development of the property is subject to all
existing zoning regulations;
3) Any development must meet all City standards, which
would include the removal of billboards at such
time that development occurs;
4) The offer is good for 30 days;
5) The payment of $300,000 must be in the form of a
one-time cash payment.
Motion carried unanimously.
12. Consideration of Chamber request for office space.
Chamber President, Bob Dawson, and board member, Mary Micke,
wore present to request that the City assist the Chamber with
finding office space for use by the Chamber of Commerce.
Mayor Maus outlined a concept for providing the Chamber with
space that would be developed by the City than leased back to
the Chamber. The location for the Chamber office would be the
present museum and restroom space at the southwest corner of
Broadway and Highway 25. Maus noted that there are good
reasons for reviewing the concept of developing Chamber office
space at this site: 1) the present use of the site is as a
museum is somewhat under-utilizod. It may bo possible to
combine the exhibits with the Chamber office facility. 2) the
existing structure and plantings need updating, and such an
update could improve the appearance of the corner. 3) parking
is sufficient for the intensity of use expected with operation
Pago 5
Council Minutes - 6/24/91
of a Chamber office. In terms of financing, Maus noted that
the site could be improved/ remodeled by the City and leased to
the Chamber of Commerce.
Brad Fyle indicated that he would like to see if the senior
citizens have a problem with giving up or sharing the museum
space.
Shirley Anderson noted that she would like more information on
how much it would cost to develop the site as proposed.
After discussion, it was the consensus of Council to direct
City staff to investigate the physical aspects of developing
the site and report back to Council with cost estimates.
Bob Dawson requested that the City consider allowing the
Chamber of Commerce to use space in City Hall for short-term
use by the new employee proposed for the Chamber.
Brad Fyle indicated that he has no problem in allowing the
Chamber of Commerce to use City Hall on a short-term basis if
there is a plan for moving the Chamber employee in the near
future.
After discussion, it was the consensus of Council to allow the
Chamber of Commerce to use City Hall office space for use by
a Chamber employee for a 90 -day to 120 -day period while plans
are being made to find a permanent home for the Chamber
office.
13. Consideration of options for parking lot expansion at City
Hall.
Council reviewed various site plans presented by Council. It
was the consensus of Council to select alternative #3;
however, plan 13 should be modified by eliminating the alley
to the west of the parking lot linking the two drive aislos
and through elimination of the island green space in the
middle of the parking area.
14. Consideration of a resolution aupportinq county adoption of
local sales tax option.
City Administrator, Rick wolfsteller, reported that the
Minnesota State Legislature recently passed a now tax bill for
Minnesota which included a sales tax increase from 68 to 6.58
statewide. The additional 1/28 increase in sales tax is
effective July 1, 1991, and will automatically expire on
December 31, 1991. While the term "option" is included in the
Page 6
9
Council Minutes - 6/24/91
law, in reality each county and municipality in the state
stands to lose a lot of local government aid and homestead
credit aid if they do not increase the sales tax by 1/28 next
year.
For the local option sales tax to take effect after December
31, 1991, each county board must decide to impose the tax.
Since the City of Monticello does now receive approximately
$242,000 in homestead credit reimbursements, the City of
Monticello again could stand to lose this type of aid if
Wright County does not opt for the sales tax increase. The
proposed resolution simply urges the county to adopt the 1/28
local option sales tax.
After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded
by Clint Herbst to approve a resolution urging the county to
adopt. the 1/28 local option sales tax. Motion carried
unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 91-21.
Consideration of speed study for Chelsea Road and approval of
the county posting the paved shoulders on Countv Road 117 near
Hiqhway 25 with "no parkina."
John Simola reported that at the request of a local property
owner, the county has looked into consistency of speed zones
on County Road 117, Chelsea Road, and County Road 118. The
county is also looking at parking problems along County
Road 117 and right -shoulder passing along the same road.
Simola wont on to report that the county engineer suggested
that the City contact the Commissioner of Transportation to
determine the correct speed zone on Chelsea Road. The City
public works department posted this road at 30 mph some years
ago due to concerns with the fast traffic in the area. More
than likely, the Commissioner of Highways will determine that
the speed limit should be above 30 mph, especially in that
area of Chelsea east of Fallon to County Road 118.
Kon Maus noted that he had no problems with having the
Commissioner of Transportation determine the proper posted
speed limit for Chelsea between Fallon Avenue and County
Road 117. Maus also indicated that we should got the opinion
of adjoining property owners prior to placing "no parking"
signs on Oakwood Drive in the area of Tom Thumb, Silver Fox
Inn, McDonalds, and Hoglund Transportation.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and
seconded by Clint Herbst to adopt a resolution requesting that
the Commissioner of Highways study the area known as Chelsea
Road from County Road 117 to County Road 118 to determine the
Page 7
MAE
Council Minutes - 6/24/91
proper speed limit and contact property owners adjacent to
Oakwood Drive for input regarding placement of "no parking"
signs. Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 91-22.
16. Consideration of final payment for Proiect 90-04, utilitv
Improvements and appurtenant work for Sandbero East.
John Simola reported that the restoration work on the Sandberg
East project is now complete. The contract as bid was
$167,986. After adding change order #1 of $2,250, the total
contract cost amounted to $170,236. The final quantities with
extensions at unit prices show a total value of the work
completed at $173,051. To date, the contractor has been paid
$157,008, leaving a balance due of $16,043. Simola
recommended that the City of Monticello authorize final
payment to Annandale Contracting, Inc., for Project 90-04 in
the amount of $16,043.49.
After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded
by Shirley Anderson to approve final payment to Annandale
Contracting, Inc., of Annandale, Minnesota, in the amount of
$16,043.49. Motion carried unanimously.
17. Consideration of purchasina tractor/mower/snowblower for the
parks department.
John Simola reported that last December the City Council
authorized the public works department to rent a 955 John
Deere 4-wheol drive hydrostatic tractor with a 59 -inch 2 -stage
snowblower, 72 -inch mower, front -mount sweeper, and cab. The
primary function of the unit was to clear sidewalks of snow
utilizing the blower and the broom. In addition, we wanted a
unit that would also serve as a mower for the City, as we were
In need of an additional mower unit.
In preparation for the purchase, an amount of $55,000 was
placed in the 1991 capital outlay budget for the parks system.
Originally, we had proposed a more heavy industrial type of
unit for clearing sidewalks. Additional research by City
staff and Councilmomber Dan Blonigen gave us now direction
toward the use of the 955 John Deere. It is proposed that we
keep our existing 650 John Deere to serve as a mower and
backup snowblower.
We have obtained a quota from Scharber a Sons of Rogers,
Minnesota, for tho purchase of the tractor currently being
rented or leased by the City. The purchase price is $14,451.
We also have a second quote from Poifus Equipment of
Stillwater, and the amount of that quote is $20,902.
Pago 8
8
Council Minutes - 6/24/91
After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and
seconded by Shirley Anderson to authorize purchase of the John
Deere 955 4 -wheel drive tractor from Scharber 6 Sons of
Rogers, Minnesota, for $14,451. Motion carried unanimously.
18. Consideration of a proposal for exterior restoration of the
new Monticello Fire Station.
Building Inspector, Gary Anderson, explained that the new
Monticello Fire Station siding is in need of resealing.
Anderson went on to review the need for the protective coating
and indicated that the firm of Erickson Protective Coatings
has quoted a price of $8,489 to apply the protective sealant
to the fire station.
Clint Herbst indicated that the City should be examining
alternative ways to protect the siding. He noted that it is
rather expensive to have to apply an expensive protective
coating every four years.
After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded
by Shirley Anderson to approve the proposal from Erickson
Protective C^9tinrtq to the amount of $8,489; however, staff is
directed to negotiate the beat warranty possible on the work
completed by Erickson Protective Coatings. voting in favor:
Ken Maus, Brad Fyle, Shirley Anderson. Opposed: Clint
Herbst.
19. Consideration of bills for the month of June.
After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and
seconded by Brad Fyle to approve the bills as submitted.
Motion carried unanimously.
20. Other matters.
Ken Maus suggested that the City make a special effort to
recognize the contributions made by Northern States Power
toward the well-being and development of the city of
Monticello in conjunction with the 20 -year celebration of the
operation of the nuclear power plant.
Jeff O'Neill
Assistant Administrator
Pago 9
LID
Council Agenda - 7/8/91
4. Consideration of reviewing the Economic Development
Authority's jEDA) aperoval of Greater Monticello Enterprise
Fund (GMEF) Loan No. 003 for Aroplax Corporation. (O.K.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
On June 26, 1991, the EDA approved GMEF Loan No. 003 for the
Aroplax Corporation. The approved loan request was for
$30,000, and the use of the proceeds is for machinery b
equipment. The interest rate was approved at 6.58 (two
percent below prime rate) over seven years. The developer's
loan fee was set at actual costs or not to exceed $450. The
loan approval is subject to bank commitment and SBA approval.
Jerry and Mary Schoen of Aroplax Corporation were present at
the EDA meeting, as well as Deb Gustafson of Business
Development Services, Inc. Aroplax plans to relocate to
Monticello in the Oakwood Industrial Park and construct an
approximate 23,000 sq ft facility. The company is relocating
from their present facility because of the need to increase
their ceiling height from 10 feet to 24 feet, which will.
increase productivity and efficiency. New jobs to Monticello
are 20-25 of which 5-6 will be hired locally over the next two
years. Mr. Schoen hopes the company can occupy the new
facility by the end of October.
Deb Gustafson reported the company appears to be a credit-
worthy business, as the debt to net worth ratio falls within
the industry average of 3.9 to .9. The company's financials
of the last 3-1/2 years indicate an increase in sales and a
profit. The company appears to be well managed, and the cash
flow to total debt service ratio is sufficient. Although the
Norwest Bank Camden commitment letter hasn't been received,
Deb foresees no problem and anticipates submittal of the SBA
loan to the OMNI Board in early July, with SBA approval the
end of July.
City Attorney Paul Woingarden reviewed the loan application
documents and concluded the overall project was a good project
for Monticello. His suggestion was to obtain a personal
guarantee and a promissory note guaranteed by the Schoene as
collateral.
Enclosed is a copy of the EDA's analysis of the Aroplax's
formal loan application compared to the GMEF public purposes
and guidelines and a copy of the executed EDA loan approval
form.
Council Agenda - 7/8/91
At this time, the EDA requests that City Council review the
EDA's Axoplax loan approval for consistency with the GMEF
public purposes and guidelines. The GMEF guidelines state:
The EDA shall have the authority to approve or deny loans;
however, within 21 days of EDA approval, the City Council may
reverse a decision by the EDA to approve a loan if it is
determined by the Council that such loan was issued in
violation of GMEF Guidelines.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. No motion is necessary if the City Council determines the
EDA's decision to approve the Aroplax GMEF loan was
issued consistent with the GMEF Guidelines.
2. Make a motion to reverse the EDA's decision if the City
Council determines the EDA's decision to approve the
Aroplax GMEF loan was issued in violation of the GMEF
Guidelines.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff agrees that the EDA's decision to approve the Aroplax
GMEF loan was issued consistent to the GMEF public purposes
and guidelines and recommends the Council need only
acknowledge that they reviewed the EDA's decision and found
the Aroplax Corporation GMEF loan to be consistent with the
GMEF public purposes and guidelines.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the EDA analysis of the Aroplax formal loan
application compared to the GMEF public purpose and
guidelines; Copy of the executed EDA loan approval form.
2
GREATER MONTICELLO ENTERPRISE FUND
FORMAL APPROVAL REVIEW
FOR
JERALD J SCHOEN AND MARY E SCHOEN, HUSBAND AND WIFE
AXOPLAX CORPORATION
2318 CHESTNUT AVENUE WEST
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55405
(612) 374-1722
COMPLIANCE WITH THE GMEF PUBLIC PURPOSES AND POLICIES:
Aroplax currently has 22 employees and they plan to hire an
additional 5 employees within the next two years of which each
job will be equivalent to at least 37.5 hours per week.
2. The Axoplax project will increase the community tax base by
approximately $22,800 annually.
3. GMEF will be used to assist an existing industrial business
relocating to Monticello.
4. The GMEF will be used as a secondary source of financing to
Norwest Bank Camden.
5. A situation of gap financing exists as the package consist of
SBA, TIF, and the GMEF.
6. The GMEF is used to assist a federal program, the SBA.
7. Aroplax's financial statements were analyzed as a credit
worthy business by Business Development Services and foresee
no problem in obtaining the bank commitment letter from
Norwest Bank Camden.
BUSINESS ELIGIBILITY:
Industrial business.
Business located within the City of Monticello, Oakwood
Industrial Park.
Credit worthy existing business relocating to Monticello.
Loan request $30,000. $10,000 per 3 jobs equals $30,000.
II. FINANCING METHOD:
Companion Direct Loan - The GMEF is in a subordinated position
and the GMEF's lower interest rate has an effective interest
rate for the entire project.
G
III. USE OF PROCEEDS:
Machinery and equipment. The EDA or City of Monticello will
be secured by a third lien position on the new equipment being
acquired.
IV. TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
Loan Size: The GMEF currently has committed funds of
$200,000 thereby the maximum loan issuance is
$100,000 (508 of fund balance). The Aroplax
request and approved for $30,000.
Leveraging: Bank $462,500 49.418 Minimum 608
OMNI/SBA $381,000 40.718 private/public,
GMEF $ 30,000 3.208 Maximum 308
GMEF,
Equity/TIF; 62,500 6.688 Minimum 108 of
GMEF ($3,000)
Loan Term: Personal property term not to exceed life of
equipment (generally 5-7 years). Approved
amortized over 7 years.
Interest Rate: Fixed rate not less than 28 below Minneapolis
prime rate. Prime rate per First Bank,
Minneapolis, 6-26-91, 8.58. Interest rate
approved at 6.58.
Loan Fee: Minimum fee of $200 but not to exceed 1.58 of
the total loan project. Approved at actual
cost or not to exceed $450.00.
Prepayment
Policy: No penalty for prepayment.
Assumability
of Loan: None.
Business Equity
Requirements: Subject to type of loan. $3,000 equity is
portion of TIF.
Collateral: Liens on real property in project (mortgage
deed).
Liens on real property in business (mortgage
deed) .
Lions on roal property held personally
(subject to EDA - homestead exempt).
Machinery and equipment lions (except
equipment exempt from bankruptcy).
Personal and/or corporate guarantees (requires
unlimited personal guarantees).
0
City Attorney suggestion is to obtain a
personal guarantee and a promissary note
guaranteed by the Schoens.
Participating Lending Institution: Norwest Bank Camden, Judy
Wenderoth, (612) 667-1605.
0
GREATER MONTICELLO ENTERPRISE FUND
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
IN AND FOR THE
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Preliminary Loan Application approval 4-14-91
Loan terms negotiated and agreed upon between the developer, the EDA,
tlryygg�xxxxvSv.�_v, and the EDA Executive Director 6/26/91
Formal loan application and financial statements analyzed by the
lending institution and/6*Xr.�BDS, Inc 6/26/91
Formal loan documents reviewed by,city staff 6-21-91
Building permit approval or construction commitment
Loan documents reviewed by the City Attorney 6/25/91
Economic Development Authority approval or disapproval:
Loan Number GMEF No. 003 Loan approved Yes
Borrower Aroplax Corporation '"- .
Address LJia unescnue.Ave.-w. ngls 55405 Loon disapproved
Loan Amount $30,000
Rate 6.3* Date 6/26/91
Terms 7 years
Subject to nanK commicmene and anA approval. Loan fee of actual costs or not to
exceed $450.00.
A iu tlaa as wade by EDA oaoLaz Barbara Schwienteh to (appruv -
*Kl d GMEF in the amount of }30,000.00
dollars and cents to developer Aroplax Corporation (Jerald J and Mary E. Schoen)
this 26 day of June 1991 Seconded by EDA
member Al Larson
TEAS: Ron Hoglund NAYS: None Absent: Bob Mosford
Brad Fyle
Harvey Kendall
Clint Herbst
GMEF disbursed 19_ by Check No.
EDA Treasurer
City Council may reverse an EDA loan derision within twenty-one days
of EDA approval. July 8, 1991 Council Agenda.
ACCEPTANCE OF TERMS
-r(We) hereby accept the terms stated above as approved
by the Economic Development Authority in and Par ha lty /of Monticello.
Dated: 6/26/91%%2}�c.� (� „�� lUc_i�r�✓
Council Agenda - 7/8/91
5. Consideration of adopting a resolution callinq for a public
hearing on the proposed modification by the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Monticello of
the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1, the
modification of the tax increment financing plans for Tax
Increment Financing District Nos. 1-1 through 1-12L and the
adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment
Financing District No. 1-13, all located within Redevelopment
Project No. 1. (O.K.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
On June 12, 1991, the HRA adopted a resolution modifying the
Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1 modifying
the TIF plans relating to TIF Districts 1-1 through 1-12 and
approving the establishment of TIF District No. 1-13.
District No. 1-13 is being created as an economic district
(10 -year district) for developer, Shingobee, Inc. (Gae Veit).
This project idea was initiated by the Industrial Development
Committee as a creative marketing tool. Since the City of
Monticello currently has only 7,200 sq ft of leaseable
industrial space (M 6 P Transports, Inc.) and the City
receives inquiries for larger amounts of leaseable industrial
space, the idea to complete the pre -plans necessary for a
marketing development project began. This marketing
development project does not construct a building to sit
vacant in the industrial park but reduces the preplan work
time for a project by 60 to 90 days, which will enable us to
market plans for a new facility (three opllunal sizes) aL a
reduced rental cost available within a time period of actual
construction.
Building plane for a 25,000 sq ft, 20,000 sq ft, or 15,000 sq
ft manufacturing/office facility and landscaping/drainage
plans have boon reviewed and accepted by the Building
Inspector and OSM, and the TIF creation process will be
completed to the point of holding the City Council public
hearing on July 22. After closing the public hearing, the
pre -plan work time will be completed and Shingobee, Inc., and
the City can start marketing the development project plans.
The actual adoption of the TIF plan and establishment of
District No. 1-13 will not occur until a qualified leases is
found and thereafter will the actual construction of the
building begin.
The use of TIF is not and must not be a benefit to the
developer but is used as a carry through to a leasee in the
form of a rental reduction cost. Rental reduction is
Council Agenda - 7/8/91
approximately $.75 per square foot. The financing method used
in this project is pay-as-you-go and not up -front financing;
in other words, the City will not bond for this project.
Initially, the HRA advertised for a request of proposal and
selected Shingobee, Inc., from among the returned request for
proposal bids. The developer has a commitment on Lot 8,
Block 2, Oakwood industrial Park, from the Oakwood Partnership
for one year. The HRA has received the developer's financial
statements, a commitment fee of $5,000, and the executed
Letter of Intent which was drafted by the City Attorney. The
City virtually has no risk in the project but feels confident
that the project will be successful (finding a qualified
leasee); however, the City has made no guarantees to the
success of the project. The development agreement is in the
process of being drafted and will not be executed until the
time a qualified leasee is found.
At this time, the HRA requests the City Council adopt the
resolution calling for a public hearing date of Monday,
July 22, 1991, for the modification of the Redevelopment Plan
and TIF District Plan Noe. 1-1 through 1-12, and the adoption
of TIF District No. 1-13.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Adopt the resolution calling for the public hearing on
July 22, 1991. T n _`-. 6F VAAC1
2. Deny adoption of the resolution calling for the public
hearing.
3. Table adopting the resolution.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Recommendation is alternative 01, to adopt the resolution
calling for the public hearing on July 22, 1991.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the Redevelopment Project No. 1 and TIF District
No. 1-13 maps; Copy of the resolution for adoption.
4
;AV
t
RR
.IN I ;
Tax increment Finance District No. 1-13,
L
00A, ,
Councilmember introduced the following resolution,
the reading of which was dispensed with by unanimous consent, and moved its
adoption:
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE
PROPOSED MODIFICATION, BY THE HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF
MONTICELLO, OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. I, THE MODIFICATION OF
THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS FOR TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NOS. 1-1 THROUGH 1-12
AND THE ADOPTION OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRJCT NO. 1-13,
ALL LOCATED WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows:
Section 1. Public Hearing. This Council shall meet on July 22, 1991, at
approximately 7:00 p.m., to hold a public hearing on the following matters: (a) the
proposed modification, by increased project costs, of the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority's (the "Authority") Redevelopment Project No. 1; (b)
the proposed modification, by increased project costs, of Tax Increment Financing
Districts Nos. 1-1 through 1-12, located within Redevelopment Project No. 1; (c)
the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-13, located within
Redevelopment Project No. l; (d) the proposed adoption of the Modified
Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1; (e) the proposed adoption
of the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing
Districts Nos. 1-1 through 1-12 and (f) the proposed adoption of the Modified Tax
Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-13, all
pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to
469.047, inclusive, as amended, and Sections 469.174 to 469.179, inclusive, as
amended.
0
Resolution No. _
Page 2
Section 2. Notice of Hearing: Filing of Program. The City Administrator
is authorized and directed to cause notice of hearing, substantially in the form
attached hereto as Exhibit A, to be given as required by law, to place a copy of
the proposed Modified Redevelopment Plan, Modified Tax Increment Financing
Plans and Tax Increment Financing Plan on file in the Adminstrator's office at
City Hall and to make such copy available for inspection by the public no later
than June 12, 1991.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded
by Councilmember , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against the same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted by the
Council in and for the City of Monticello, Minnesota, on July 8, 1991.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Administrator
0
Council Agenda - 7/8/91
Consideration of renewing animal services agreement --Patty
Salzwedel. (R.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Since July of 1988, the City has had a contract arrangement
with Patty Salzwedel of Monticello to perform the animal
control functions for the city, including the pound
maintenance daily. Both the pound and the animal control
agreement were for a one-year time period and were
automatically renewable for additional one-year terms. Since
the agreement is up for renewal in July, the contracts and her
compensation should be reviewed by the Council.
From the administration's standpoint, I believe Patty, along
with her husband, Tracy, has been doing an excellent job in
both the cleaning and maintenance of the dog pound facility
and in their animal control services role. The Salzwedels are
responsible for animal control basically on a full-time basis,
including evenings, weekends, and holidays. The City staff
has had very few complaints regarding our animal control
services since Patty has taken over in 1988, and Patty was
initially instrumental in recommending numerous changes to our
animal control ordinance, including the requirement for dog
license renewals and vaccinations for rabies. Patty has
organized and held two rabies clinics for the Monticello
public, which have soon favorable response from our citizens
and has also increased our license fee revenue. Patty has
handled all types of complaints, including barking dogs,
running at large, animal abuse, etc.; and over the past 12
months, she has handled over 100 complaints. Patty's record
keeping has been excellent with well-maintained and accurate
information regarding impoundment and retrieval of animals
from the other 11 cities and townships that contract with the
City of Monticello for using our shelter.
While Patty is portorming both aspects of animal control and
pound maintenance, we do have separate agreements for those
services, with the pound maintenance currently compensated
monthly at $272.50. The animal control services aro paid at
$654 per month. Enclosed with the agenda you will find a
summary of our animal control expenses for a 12 -month period
from May 1, 1990, through May 1, 1991. Our total expenditures
for animal control services were approximately $24,000, and
our income from boarding and impoundment foes from local and
othor jurisdictions totaled $15,768 with an additional license
foe revenue of $1,250. It should be noted that the number of
animals impounded for the 12 -month period ending May 1991
versus the prior year has increased 60% to a 1991 average of
48 animals per month. Total animals impounded in 1990 was 474
versus 297 in 1989. Due to the volume increase in animals
Council Agenda - 7/8/91
that Patty is responsible for and the excellent service she
has been providing, I believe an increase in her contracts is
warranted. As with most contract arrangements, it is
anticipated that a cost of living adjustment can usually be
justified. Patty is responsible for her own phone charges,
which average approximately $50 per month, and Patty also
provides her own vehicle for transportation purposes with her
gasoline expenses exceeding $60 per month on an average.
While naturally some days are worse than others, the animal
control services are exceeding 30 hours per week on an
average. The City also has recently provided contract
services for housing animals to the City of Rogers and Hassen
Township. Utilizing the cost of living percentage that was
applied to non-union employees for 1991 of 5.48 would adjust
the cleaning contract from $272.50 per month to $287.25 per
month. The animal control services contract of $654 per month
would increase to $689 per month. Due to the fact that I
believe Patty has provided excellent service when considering
she is on call almost 24 hours a day and 7 days a week, due to
limited complaints regarding animals or the services provided
being received by City staff, and due to the large increase in
the number of animals being impounded and cared for, I would
support An ndditlonal increase above a cost of living
adjustment on these contracts for the upcoming year. A
possible suggestion would be to increase the cleaning contract
to $300 per month and the animal control contract to $700 per
month. This would make the total contract arrangement $1,000
per month versus $926.50 currently or approximately a 7.98
Increase.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Authorize renewal of the contract arrangement with Patty
Salzwedel with a monthly contract payment being increased
by a cost of living adjustment of approximately 5.41.
The cleaning contract would amount to $287.25, with the
animal control services contract being at $689.
2. Renew the contract arrangements and adjust the
compensation to $300 for cloaning and $700 for animal
control services. This would equate to a 7.9% increase
overall.
3. Renew the contract arrangements at the present level of
compensation.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
As I indicated above, the City staff has had very few
complaints regarding the animal control services, and I
believe Patty has boon doing an excellent job in all aspects
Council Agenda - 7/8/91
of the services. A cost of living adjustment is certainly
warranted based on her performance, and because of the
increase in the number of animals she is handling, I believe
an additional 2.5% would be appropriate.
The Council should also consider increasing our daily
impoundment charge for housing animals, which is currently
$7.25 per day per animal. Because our costs continue to
increase annually, the daily amount we charge to other
cmmunities that utilize our facilities should also be
increased to correspond. As a result, I would recommend the
Council increase the daily charge to $7.50, which would
increase our annual revenue from impoundment arrangements by
approximately $700 per year.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of current contracts; Revenue and expenditure summaries,
along with animal impoundment summaries.
FIT .� sU � o F t ►�, �-X ,o � � f -t - s 4.a,<.T
7
AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
This agreement, made this 12th day of June, 1990, by and between the
City of Monticello, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as
"City"), and Patty Salzwedel, an individual (hereinafter referred to as
"Salzwedel"), sets out terms and conditions for the general purpose of
providing animal control to the residents of the city.
WHEREAS, the City has a duly adopted ordinance regulating animal
control, and
WHEREAS, enforcement of said ordinance cannot be restricted to
standard employee scheduling procedures, and
WHEREAS, the City desires to provide such enforcement through the
services of a private party which will be able to respond as needed under
the general quidelines provided by the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, in and for consideration of the mutual covenants and
conditions hereinafter contained, the parties hereto mutually agree as
follows:
1. a. The City, in and for consideration of the sum of Six
Hundred Fifty-four Dollars and 00/100 ($654.00) per month
payable on Lhe last Luninuse day of each month, hereby
contracts with Salzwedol for the period of twelve (12)
months from the date of execution of this agreement for the
services of Salzwedol as Animal Control Officer.
b. Effective August 1, 1988, the City agrees to compensate
Salzwodol monthly an additional foe of $4.00 per animal
disposed of through the Humano Society and $10.00 per
animal disposed of through direct adoption procedures.
ANIMAL.AGR: 6/16/90 Pago 1
O
2. Salzwedel hereby agrees to perform substantially the following
services as Animal Control Officer:
a. Provides prompt, timely response to animal calls
(complaints, reports of loose animals).
b. Maintains and enforces security measures as prescribed by
City Administrator, Public Works Director, and/or
Superintendent of wastewater treatment facility.
C. Conducts random patrol runs at own discretion but within
prescribed limits set by City Administrator.
d. Monitors care of kennels and animals.
e. Conducts periodic observation of animals in impound for
sickness, injury, etc.
f. Promptly notifies an animal health professional when an
animal is determined to be distressed.
g. Serves as regular attendant of impound facility during
"public hours," said hours to be determined by City
Administrator.
1
h. Provides timely response to requests to reclaim animals
from and/or impound animals at the facility other than
during "public hours." (It is considered reasonable to
respond to routine calls between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.
dally. Emergency calls can be expected to occur outside
these hours.) Although timely telephone response to pager
calla are expected on Sunday, both parties agree that
patrol services on this day may be limited to urgent and/or
emergency calls.
I. Exorcisco care to ensure Lhe humdnd treaLmtlnL of animals
both in transport and during impoundment.
j. Ensures collection of fines and impound foes prior to
release of animals.
k. Maintains accurate, current records for each animal.
1. Maintains orderly records filing systems for easy retrieval
of information.
M. Promptly transports unclaimed and/or severely distressed
and suffering animals to outhanization facility.
n. Makes timely submittal of loge and records to the City
financo department.
o. Provides animals with frcah food and wator each afternoon.
ANIMAL.ACR: 6/18/90 Pago 2
O
P . Conducts cursory cleaning (waste removal, etc.) as needed,
each afternoon.
q. Maintains and submits on a monthly basis a complete record
of animals adopted, which includes an approved "release
form" signed by the adopting party.
3. Salzwedel hereby agrees to provide service seven (7) days per
week. If Salzwedel cannot be on call for any period of time,
Salzwedel hereby agrees to provide and pay for an approved
replacement during such period.
4. Salzwedel hereby agrees to utilize his/her own vehicle to
perform the aforementioned tasks, and further, to provide proper
insurance coverage to indemnify and hold harmless the City from
any claims or violations arising from the operation of said
vehicle (certificate of Insurance to be provided to City). The
City agrees to pay mileage to and from veterinary clinics
outside the city of Monticello when approved by the City
Administrator. The payment shall be at $0.25 per mile.
5. The City hereby agrees to provide and maintain appropriate
Insurance coverage for all City owned facilities and for all
claims arising from charges of neglect er inhumane treatment of
animals, provided that Salzwedel, as Animal Control Officer,
observes and exorcises all proper moans of fulfilling the duties
heroin statod.
6. The City hereby agrees to assume the cost of animal food and
Incidental health supplies and pound maintenance supplies and
operating equipment.
ANIMAL.AGR: 6/18/90 Page 3
O
7. The City hereby agrees to perform or have performed all
essential maintenance tasks that lie beyond the scope of the
duties outlined herein or as can be reasonably expected as
routine custodial maintenance.
8. It is hereby agreed by both parties that this agreement may be
terminated at any time by either party, with or without any
reasons, provided that the party wishing to terminate this
agreement shall provide written notice to the other party at
least thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of the
termination.
This agreement shall run for the period first stipulated above and
shall automatically renew itself for a like period unless a thirty (30) day
written notice is given that one of the parties hereto desires to engage
in discussion concerning the terms and conditions stated herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to
be executed in their behalf.by themselves and/or their proper officers by
their signatures the day and year first written above.
CITY
/OF/M'ONTICE��LLO
WW City Admin trator
G1 --/y
Date
UJGl:isli7. /�.�t2C/JY��
WStnoos
ANIMAL.AGR: 6/18/90
INDIVIDUAL �% O
Date
P
AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
This agreement, made this 12th day of June, 1990, by and between the
City of Monticello, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as
"City"), and Patty Salzwedel and Tracy Salzwedel, an individual
(hereinafter referred to as "the Salzwedels"), sets out terms and
conditions for the general purpose of providing humane animal impoundment.
WHEREAS, the City has a duly adopted ordinance regulating animal
control, and
WHEREAS, enforcement of said ordinance cannot be restricted to
standard employee scheduling procedures, and
WHEREAS, the City provides such enforcement by way of a contract for
the services of a private party, and
WHEREAS. the City owns and operates an animal impound facility, and
WHEREAS, the City desires to operate said facility in such a manner
as to assure safe, sanitary, and humane treatment of impounded animals.
NOW, THEREFORE, in and for consideration of the mutual covenants and
conditions hereinafter contained, the parties hereto mutually agree as
follows:
1. The City, in and for consideration of the sum of Two Hundred
Sevonty-two Dollars and 50/100 ($272.50) per month payable on
the last business day of each month, hereby contracts with the
Salzwodols for the period of twelve (12) months from the date of
execution of this agreement for the services of the Salzwodele
as Animal Impound Officer.
2. The Salzwodels hereby agree to perform substantially the
following services as Animal Impound Officer:
Po 1
POUND.AGR: 6/18/90 e
Custodial
a. Daily removal of animal waste.
b. Daily washing, rinsing, disinfecting of animal pens.
C. General work area will be kept neat and clean.
d. Supplies, tools, etc., will be kept in proper storage when
not in use.
e. Immediate reporting to City Administrator of needed
repairs, mechanical problems or failures, and other
maintenance problems which should be referred to the public
works department.
f. Maintain neat, clean appearance of outside area in the
immediate proximity of the impound facility.
Animal Care 6 Feedinq
a. Daily disposal of food and water from previous day's
feeding.
b. Daily washing and disinfecting of food and water dishes.
C. Provide fresh food and water daily.
d. Daily disinfectant of litter trays.
e. Replace cat litter daily.
f. Routine observation of animals for sickness, injury, etc.,
and prompt reporting to proper authority (veterinarian,
AnImAl Cnntrnl nfficer).
g. Will allow dogs into outside kennel area daily.
Record Keepinq
a. Maintain accurate, up-to-date records of hours and tasks
performed.
b. Maintain orderly records file for easy retrieval of
information.
C. Prompt submittal of logs and financial records to the City
Finance Director.
Other
a. Maintain a suitable inventory of food, litter, cleaning
supplies. Custodian shall be authorized to make such minor
purchases at own discretion.
b. Prompt reporting of any irregularities in facility or
general operation.
C. Assist (as needed and upon reasonable request) the Animal
Control Officer in the performance of hie/her duties.
d. Maintain and enforce security measures as prescribed by the
City Administrator, Public works Director, and/or
Superintendent of wastewater treatment facility.
POUND.AGR: 6/18/90 Page
3. The City hereby agrees to provide and maintain appropriate
insurance coverage for all City owned facilities and for all
claims arising from charges of neglect or inhumane treatment of
animals, provided that the Salzwedels, as Animal Impound
Officer, observes and exercises all proper means of fulfilling
the duties herein stated.
4. The City hereby agrees to assume the cost of animal food and
incidental health supplies and pound maintenance supplies and
operating equipment.
5. The City hereby agrees to perform or have performed all
essential maintenance tasks that lie beyond the scope of the
duties outlined herein or as can be reasonably expected as
routine custodial maintenance.
6. It is hereby agreed by both parties that this agreement may be
terminated at any time by either party, with or without any
reason, provided that the party wishing to terminate this
agreement shall provide written notice to the other party at
least thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of the
termination.
This agreement shall run for the period first stipulated above and
shall automatically renew itself for a like period unless a thirty (30) day
written notice is given that one of the parties hereto desires to engage
In discussion concerning the terms and conditions stated herein.
POUND. 6/18/90 Pago y�
}
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to
be executed in their behalf by themselves and/or their proper officers by
their signatures the day and year first written above.
\(/CI^TY/- OF MONTICCE�LL�O�
Witn s City Adminidtrator
G�y/moi a
Date
/� I IVIDUAL
Witness
Date
POUND.AGRs 6/18/90 Page 4
ANIMAL CONTROL EXPENCES
tae=c¢occccc¢=acsce¢=o¢¢n
FROM 511190 TO 511191
-----------------------
PROFFF.SSIONAL SERVICES - ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER
14,264.00
CLEANING SUPPLIES
591.17
OPERATING SUPPLIES
1,582.75
BUILDING REPAIR
228.00
TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT
151,00
MISC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - v2i d 3aavpE,`L
5,564.35
11Y onq„ �IC
TELEPHONE
790.26
TRAVEL EXPENSE
70.00
CONFERENCE AND SCHOOL'S
40.00
GENERAL PUBLIC INFO
371.64
GAS (HEAT SHELTER)
366.03
DUE'S AND SUBCRIPTION'S
20.00
MISC AND OTHER
9.50
(TOTAL) 24,049.45
ANIMAL CONTROL INCOME
aonm¢n¢¢raasoaanmmamam¢
5/1/90 TO 5/1/91
BOARDING AND IMPOUNDMENT FEE'S 15,767.60
LICENSING FEE'S 1,250.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------
(TOTAL) 17,017.50
89 ANIMAL'S NOT CLAIMF.D THAT VERB PICKED UP IN THE CITY OF MONTI-
CELLO AT $59.50 EACH FOR BOARD AND DISPOSAL, THAT 19 NOT PAID
BY THE CITY. S 6,295.50
--------------------------------------------.-------_-------------------
TOTAL INCOME { 22,313.00
■gsrarassra umrrtmre ,
k
IMPOUNDMENT 1 PLACEMENT RECORDS JUNE 1989 THRU MAY 1991
NUMBERS OF ANIMALS IMPOUNDED TOTAL INCRESE
---------------------------- -------------
89 JUNE 20
90 JUNE
46
26
89 JULY 22
90 JULY
40
18
89 AUG 31
90 AUG
42
11
89 SEPT 33
90 SEPT
39
06
89 OCT 35
90 OCT
45
10
89 NOY 27
90 NOV
61
34
89 DEC 17
90 DEC
46
29
69 JAN 18
91 JAN
41
23
90 FEB 40
91 FEB
48
08
90 MAR 37
91 MAR
46
09
90 APRIL 35
91 APRIL
55
20
90 MAY 27
91 MAY
78
51
1990 AVERGE 28 PER MONTH
ccccnennnceennncncceenees
1991 AVEROE 48 PER MONTH
enccoec eccnnacca eccacccc
1989
1990
1991
TOTAL ANIMALS IMPOUNDED
--------------------------------
297
474
262
--------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL CMED
75
84
49
--------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL ADOPTED OUT
186
361
186
--------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL EUTHANSIA
--------------------------------------------------------------------
17
29
27
ACTUAL COST ON ANIMAL CONTROL 1 7,031.95
------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTUAL COST ON ANIMAL CONTROL IF YOU ALLOW
BOARDING / DISPOSAL FEE'S FOR CITY'S OWN ANIMAL'S. 1 1,736.45
----------- -------
Council Agenda - 7/8/91
Consideration of proposal for architectural and engineerinq
services for developinq lonq and short-range building
requirements and space needs for the public works department.
(J.S.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Over the past several months, City staff has been preparing
site plans of the public works facilities on Golf Course Road.
We have prepared footprint drawings of the existing buildings
and looked at the space requirements of the existing equipment
as well as future needs. We have determined 21 public works
study issues along with two water/sewer collection study
issues.
We have looked into the possibility of adding on to the
existing masonry public works building along with various
combinations of removing the old pole building or letting it
remain. There appear to be a great number of options in
regard to building additions, none of which appeared to solve
all of our needs. At that point in time, the Street
Superintendent and myself decided to look at what some other
cities have done to address their current and future needs.
There was recently an article published in the Public Works
magazine about the City of Golden Valley's new maintenance
shop. The building as constructed was a team effort between
city staff, public works employees, and the architectural/
engineering firm of TKDA.
In May, Roger and I visited the Golden Valley maintenance shop
and were impressed by what we observed. Many of the issues
currently facing Monticello as far as building expansion were
dealt with in Golden Valley. Although their maintenance
building does not provide vehicle storage on a regular basis,
It did incorporate many of the ideas we addressed in our work
study issues. The City of Golden Valley let us have a copy of
the plans for the building, and we are looking at ways to
incorporate some of those ideas into Monticello's expansion.
In early June we were contacted by the firm of TKDA who had
learned through the City of Golden Valley that the City of
Monticello was looking at expanding Its public works
buildings. Mr. Peter Brozok, who has done extensive work in
expansion of public works facilities, visited the City of
Monticello and looked at our existiny facilities and offered
his assistance. TKDA, by the way, is the same firm that
designed the City of Monticello's fire hall.
Council Agenda - 7/8/91
TKDA has prepared a proposal for developing long and short-
range building requirements and space needs for Monticello's
public works department. The study would look at several
options and would assist us with identifying methods of
expansion. The ultimate goal of the study would be to select
a cost-efficient alternative addressing all of the work study
issues and actually prepare conceptual site and floor plans
for an option selected by City staff and Council. TKDA has
given us a very attractive lump sum price of $2,750 for the
study, with an estimated $150 additional cost for mileage and
reproduction coats. In preparation for this item, we placed
an amount of $4,500 in the 1991 budget for a facilities study.
It is suggested that the Council authorize the study by TKDA
to work with a building committee as selected by the Council.
Since Councilmember Blonigen has already demonstrated his
interest in this expansion, he should be considered as one of
the committee members, along with staff.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative is to authorize TKDA to develop
long and short-range buildinq requirements and spaco
needs for the Monticello Public Works Department at a
cost of $2,750 plus mileage and reproduction costs
estimated at $150 and select a building committee to work
with TKDA.
2. The second alternative is to continue as we are working
on plans ourselves as time allows.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the City Administrator, Public
Works Director, and Street Superintendent that the City
Council authorize the public works study as outlined in
alternative 11.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of proposal from TKDA; Copy of existing equipment,
numbers, and sizes; Copy of public works study issues; Copy of
site plan for public works.
3��� G� ��� .t- Plus �•�e�e �r-,�i
jj
�c
q
Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson and Assoc. (TKDA)
2500 American National Bank Building
St. Paul, MN 55101
i
Proposal to Provide
Architectural and Engineering Services
for
Developing long and Short Range
Building Requirements and Space Needs
for
Monticello, Minnesota
Public Works Department
�c
q
Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson and Assoc. (TKDA)
2500 American National Bank Building
St. Paul, MN 55101
i
TKDA
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
July 1, 1991
Mr. Richard Wotfsteller
City Administrator
City of Monticello
PO Box 1147
Monticello, MN 55362
Re: Proposal to Provide Architectural and Engineedng
Services for a Public Works Study
Dear Mr. Wolfstelier.
TOLTZ.—G. OUV.ILL. 1N0ER30.
&No •ssov&rEs.1NCORVORATED
2SW MEFIX NITIONI 11u1N BUUM
wrn PA tL.UDKEGTA UI01.1M
$Tzrma
'" s1ZNld
We are pleased to present this proposal and workscope for a study (analysis
and recommendations) for your Public Works Facility. We are looking forward to
the opportunity of working with the City of Monticello on this project. Please sign
both copios and return one (1) to TKDA.
Sincerely yours,
Peter M. Brozek, AIA
Project Manager
PMB: kib
V
Work Plan
TKDA proposes a study which will evaluate the existing Public Works Facility,
requirements based upon projected growth, site analysis and prepare a report
which will give recommended actions and cost estimates associated with
implementation of the recommendations.
We propose the following work plan. Three options will be studied:
Option A - Expand the existing facility
Option B = Use the existing facility and develop another facility
on the reservoir site to augment the existing
Option C = Vacate the existing facility and build a new and
larger consolidated facility In the water reservoir site
Critical to the viability of the final product will be the Input of the City Council
and the City Public Works Staff as members of the project team.
I. TKDA will evaluate the existing facility from the standpoint of accessibility,
functionality and current building/zoning code requirements.
2. Analyze the current site against the possible relocation of the Public Works
Department to City owned property (water reservoir site) In the Industrial
park.
3. Deflne facility requirements for short and long range time perlods. The
facility requirement will Include:
Buildings
Parking
Outdoor Material/Equipment Storage
Expansion Potential
Work Areas
indoor Material and Equipment Storage
Personnel Areas
4. Review the requirements with City staff and identify development options
based on the following criteria:
Construction Costs
Operational Costs
Expondabillty
Adaptability
Health/Safety
5. Review and evaluate the above three (3) options and costs with City staff
and prepare preliminary conceptual site and floor plans for the option
mutually agreed upon as the most cost effective.
0
6. Prepare a report documenting the above; review the report with City staff.
7. Prepare a final report.
8. Assist the City staff with a presentation of the report to the City Council.
Comoensatlorl
We propose to prepare the above outlined report and present it, with City staff,
to the City Council, for a lump sum fee of $2,750.00 plus mileage (®.275/mile)
and reproduction costs (estimated ® $150.00).
Contractual Intent
We thank you for the opportunity to make this proposal and are willing that this
proposal consttMes a contract between us upon your signature In the space
provided below. Your return of a signed copy of this letter will serve as our
authorization to proceed with this work.
This proposal will be open for acceptance for 30 days, unless the provisions
hereof are changed by us In wrtNng prior to that time.
T. Prew, P.E.
64A611�1
Peter M. Brozek, AIA
Project Manager
ACCEPTED BY
CITY OF MONTICELLO
By
Title
Date
0
El
TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
General Provisions of Architect -Engineer Agreement
Tires Ogrwa Prangars am rnaaaga m a use4>n mryltnmag w,N a twler•
type AW*Wrre DOWSM, Ties, ah,Q, DUV" A"geeM No Anoesbs, Iro
mrmmn6 a baee,aomOarpason, tlaleetwta sew ,eamts TKDA. wr4
en ome; wnemn am OWNER enpapee TKDA o wanat dawn An
Watesuw6 wags Enpmesmrp sMMCea On a Prgem
As used hewn, ON twin9gm Ap00,119 f' rents b1,) the TKOA Pmpasal
Lana wlcn becomes err Lear Agreement uptn its acceMence a an,
OWNER. (Z VonGoreal Pmn wm am(M&myaaadnea Exnrbms, sed
awf oosrg cwt a ane aro err dame 40001111. WIN maps* m Me anger
a wo"OdenaA any atsrnaa Eowxm ow pawn deer dreg Oerlerw
Ptwnwpns RM err Lasr AW -meat OW gpran as any Aabehea Ex•
hang sM Net Gomm P"Na"ws,
AA7WA $ 3. PEICID OP SMICE
jtnerarmd NS Aglow farMaDMIX11 ad00naeenemanaw ant8
00 a M Wan In ane LOW AgrWr wd. In Nb ragan ww lama Wm or
OCM"NWNaxwamym
paam emams ft I" In I~ Agrewnwm
mrbees ww Wtoin MIpCCNCMIasirgraely alaparOtlxplwpltlPpeaa
derrFi wamwUarcewNNeschedule serbrill NNeLearApra►
arra or ww Exh*ft www Neem
ARMU 3. COMPEMBAMAI TO TKOA
A, CanOereaonali(D1lbaeenAerOeaobeaa,NbApreenw11anaa
IN ane a Wmt Sum "" want a, NOwty Rab bow as MOM24 N ane
Low AgreOenem ant a nwwww assavem
I- A Wap Sum mW d psiymea ba TKDA9 aawae"apply
n ea d pas d s was a - erne TKOAS awe ban a noway
SArras's 4 canto
ea wmea ane ryr d want Iegueea aambrrou0el wrefl
ER esm0AM+.agrarYsalaOraaPeed0uvmaY.
OThe
am01a
wr�m in somiaw bTKOA o fcimmMat
MDw3w,noa a+,e.mwaa0rrastldla
2 An okxu I Ras mad of paynNre for "COATS awwar chap epa.
w Ow aprartla axe asarwner T1aD1aT! arrote,d broadly
aMrra sivanr wr1w110ne iMf d w,b. rw}rega a ACaaraewl AUCh
,Yea Carola 0eeetenaap weh am reawalsOsaeOene d accuracy.
emW hamsonsa� Pnfywx Or TKM schnsal pww
rIw wneaa exAtr bdwq,m 0tspaarw haat er a "exi N=ew
beargrres11 MW evabw0a0eCOMeslar bapaaWtied paybf
kraft. -' ant acenwWww" brenaa eyva tlalaawfww M
Amrasraunerreaear+w+esby tf¢3A noWNEA troanraa+ta
In &=be a FIs to"w Q, TKDA snap be na "11 w ales bis
fr dbeegOsed Eapwtees win ecurrep N ane0enamaeece
tM w4".
(4) Thw l and siewamm
tb) Canauow eannaae
(C) Oura11 PeANNWW end MC%UCW aerlea eve, err antra 40
err emwae UAW TKOA a" 4%.
141 Insammabw mprawktan and rsp ,aIN mea,
tf r C WMEa sip core narn+4 pan+rra n TttOA waren 364ara
damd Im,atebewar Tawuwarr mss ser aCWrawce eem
err sae chwaee ba aerew:ee prpyaaa ant rdtwlaee eraurre0 b
am eaooaonneo by sWpaa+p "awlcs es mmrasa.
6 TheOWNERwre pa ere arena arra an tne.waft unrees OWNER
mddW TKG�nwrangd Neaneur lrmNauatnepeambe+ma4rnect
w hil aMmamoramduwatt inwect Iaea buy Nedspu,ea Item
wrp mrnan urvatm utas MSW%IW by rhe 0wt0s At da=res untied wane
3p4M.mmtmal Wt *m WUNOCe WYbeMMZoaAlMM Cn"r
a t NAepamamL aNemaa,mum anent auNantaa by tar. w,icnewar
etamIn8dNtan.TKOAmay,e1NrQ nny""mdaysrnttnnWCtmtrr
OWNEA, erat11raewcw uMw NSApteemrvumq TgtDA haseen btad
in Na for W amouna MW l dug ter pesos, aapenses and wrgea
ARTICL$ a. EXTRA WORK
If TKDA a CI Vie Daman the anew cam try hoe tam dWOCMd a Owmrm
e DW Ma Me Sma d NS AQ"wnwy6 or Na Ne nen* a wan mNruea
wm+oba aye mwaseat eatmasaara brJtwlpedaw+waam am arrwgy
00rrtalse diem wOrR try OW POmwly reafy err OWNER d les fact
Ems wall amlbaw mmmwtagaw to tame sea c a ligm d amne err
aamplwon enap Meaxeea ty a BualerrnSiAgleMlwre Mnemq Inco br
bmI partes ww a OraOaong wa, any eatewae or mama smona6ma
AMICLES ABUMMMVf..CNAMOEOPP.AMANDTERMg=CN
Ebner Peres Iw f M r4M a srmwm amt AgaenMa uPon eaa+aM web
on "Pees In waba . Me OWNER may a any ams, reduce Ne sww at
NrApmr+ree Sualr114trco0nu, acorn wgW b M a7alm ewmen ndtlOe
OanarOWNEA aTitOA,.n Orewad utaadnrdaeweoeaenanp11
w 110000 Or Cnwrpea eOnPltlaM, NS Aysanram Nay aWg to wn"nema
upn eenel days woven nWm a artwiaaa 4DOM
inaxr ere,* a am amg, ep d="* m IMehesa unMndnst, monwp
by TKDA WNW Ne AWSWAM WW w "We SMIUNg a TKDA to Ne
OWNER %M901 a ArDele 6 aro Nae Nap In no rumrr M bon of
Me OWNER b TXOA L400 NSAPrewnRR deed err pw"wv d.mase",
sine eMawe,p forw0" pwfa+rwaM aa11rlaesmeurrw m "ram arm
tlm0 a nerrrlW4". mmwrsd m KCCM&nCawnhane Pentam d Amos
3 AM err Lear AWSWOrs,
In ft err" d a rNICbCh in WON of err PM" wad, MDA WWI be and
err ane was DWIMI 1111 era axpMua elNrrad 0n fes Pmaaa wale Nue
maata AIM b wry 0WOMes4 dna AbnvaaMCwatL err whch 01ymwa
ha Ikt 601"R,apa 00rl,pub001W0aaanCOwdrerr MMus "dAmae
3 AM err LOW Ayewnw,L
AATSIML 04005 01 OP PLAMfa, REPORTA AND On" DATA
At ON tine of 0019111IM M OF 1410111nwgn Of the web. MOA "I codes
tSrYIDlO a arOWNEA. a mere. DopnQs, rears ressr"e mamas sM
m,aamrmgwapwewesgbthieotaoarvmaaL Apautlgaoanrns
wenau"Mmam e" ave wales br muse by Ms OWNERa
deaf anartergmagne Prae0lor ow aNa wawa Any M".4hout
wnesn mftlM at a0ssan ay TKOA err ane sow* ourom inmino
a sip be a OWNER'S No no am ww"A Resell, a "w apasm to
TKDA, Intnne "mesa, McOWNER w&Inww" ant ha a he miesf MOA
ham any and es ism a agents of tea pwmaa a"wq ow is wort muse.
wnch • rce $020 kale n ASM 11MOW a aupcwbd by MOA.
ARr.CLE T. OWNEiTS ACCEPTAMM e v PYRCMACE ORDER
to ped d M adOAann elfYlwp araOGOWcw taant On N0 Lear Apm►
mea. 011 CIWfaER nga,r aaeCut11 err CaYrtta a rwuq a wralaes saw
aonesaa aWy auadnxee AaNMatlN $wan puRntesagw anwl u
mryao by rerrero nr rant end aanalnas d NS Apresnem. IA Nt
deco d A C4ntae MlweMt,twtams err Odrlawom a Nne Apreerrrre ant
croe0 mreyen4 n errCWMERS4 PrnY1�dHR tlr emu sivamMwas
d this Aw""""Doom m, NaWtwww" wwOwChesO "a 010.wamwaraaaart<nawaewnraapwrawaaa»m oryl,mA
,uNwwy t I/j/J
ARTICLE a. OWNEWS R6PolIS1 XJM
A. To Winfl MDA m Danmm " senna reauaed manwrtaatme
rutNEA ansa wetly. n D1Ww aro am le0urlc6 ma call m.g r w ar
w m MDA:
1_ PnNee an necessary malrinaon regarding its rannan.ena a
rosary. b am" Drognot, a av w0ra.
2 Dargrlm m aro-q a prat ca n e OWNERS nawamma
we MD= b as swaaa 0 a nandwud unaw pre AyMrttMLL
Sudn
prep. sMa ram wawa, m asnamn Inmualals ncata
teQ11Qb.1 racerw tlertaam interpret and Win OWNERS
pclltre erg. logo= to TKDYS aeMCK
1 Fumsn,anwaabD-rbleil dTKOAServrelcsWID
Er emn p mnmatrwrm me Lmar Abaw wit want' Edd o
eaaale0 parsec dao preparm by or seraea v alwa Incu"
aleaa IYne0wL sDda.gA prebagf rna sid iuea el I
ova nYevPAaaC and Prl'I *AW^ sbamty and am
maeaweIII sm pieamewrlmamepumllter–appnlwtmpiD
YeOr:,Ia.mpl®edetwdrbegmta rarDlanralassa
taws. inl0aw ®Iw4 wmer1K btswnalK eewntwa rqv
d•waK eDdWmraa rod umY wavelc Plop" anowtamm m�
aq, dead am Alen Iwd ISO n=`C"C as Wet eOWO
deo ra C"W In ae Leas Aglwer or any aft" attsefa
lsrem
A Prete Sc m eta nap W wveaa b MDA m star upon
0tst10// v wNef I/ pwlleo pnOOerty O aOYCrd O perbin me Wert
I Ade fisawn ash mw age era a ,tall w pro" to cam wt
nary marathon we nwgmcons; ft~ UPWOYOte am DW
Ina hal. dip garwnmrnl auelvtna naaaq IYnalwmrl par Ow
Z.. era apprrwaw am alpha hDm omre a rr.wy De
weasm b Carpemn d -e Prgom
a EamM aP racatl nlotana I.lga sowliktbo em chat
ODalMrlO pla0alad ata roared by MOA, at" aey.a at An
n®nry, IlsfrO taltrgr a oars as OWNER aerls
rst/pry b a W. ev.a.am r.a rwldar m orrap Oe�as Der -
a n.vlves ewest a aa
ranbsma Ow a no Ia away mw aw •
.,= cl :..Cx
7. Dow www —tcan twee to MDA wMrwar OWNER OOaenae
C, mtanvs beans awn d any etalmesr- m0 ON= ale
now d anmq at T1mY8 unions w any appal0 dr warn Cl COI.
mu®. Ca saiansl Cammrm v MDA.
a blear mom ahrs om wm 0 eweryw." rub erlv0•
Apar amm wmlavmsmlmmd m dos plasd we welt
o etmlmaanmw at any m mlolrnaad umw 1ne PIm1aL
a JIM etch uamurrg teopmem am esnsrq and In.
wrrrOmtlOeggam"areaelaa bar P'tgect swan
wgr nenaewe eUrNEA Iter wawa v MDA net reeplaly IF
auerwe abla b sgtl two aramlrq a me P1ged Ir10Alping
el.y we mal beneed by Ca tracmn0. ren auaM.g "n itt a
OWNER mer own aucenn has for ahs pumas try Ca►
Dl® nae ue0 on morula am row ane cOtaUaOn COIraeL
die mrd. ma (scan enrage a OWNER may wrote o ascorwm
ar Calrac mei M owro "ng we arty lap nus regwa0n. T
amens ane a war apwlable to ata fnlsnaq am Pat to
tut tM vola
n Pla.%-mi drsw.w rho apeCdlm0fe b all eO6alq orgwal
pons v Lave aasdt m Oenwlen o trw PKwa
11. Plptea mor rtwi llOrsle dim OtleyawAlmlinaw
Law Ag arraw a am Eauwa eawls0 herein
s TKG aro wwelraewyaner asaatamraWlsnwwsnodln.
Gln titan nunrla bw ms OWNER. n TKOA lase wet WW odontwlal aro
rawle0 by maOWMEA bumper w awdwwm b n OIeD7e rKDA aha0
Dlaeooy fah os OWNER.
ARTICLB s. MINIM d COST
Owner of wdawe wgww ve. a tmumm mel, "to" wakdo a
tuamwy awaea scw wtaa walrus d perms wnamae amutWlarun
meewaow d dDrays era Ilspal.re>♦ ODm wwlraad b m ala Lalsr
A@diatela v ani, EaAry aladta Item ret n ba man an to bpm
d TKDAS elmlre U10sala®Ore-- .sewn TKows bans rdg►
M e N etpl./.ap dips waAtle0 deelQl prdeeroW. II a NKMIF"
I.awaw. est TKDA Opp ra "MCMM ager psmw d ala mvr.
ewrOren ocats brewlao" G re v Dar mer mow" acan�
.__ 1s/10ad anea"ldw OAts ala car W-VOALaraonld ally
homyoaromlatnca0. v awes. adiva a be Ooma -M an os bin
III TXDKS cm metra maw d acaohl be eDe tem w o pmol►
tan CI mlmwa. ama.- orAcMCJnwy. MOA 010 Aro guw 2l
ell ampaa lav Ilalr® es ra asotitaey wV homadwwls.
ant6sawa v aqm aMnIM bl TKDA 10 OWNER mraunor
ARTICLE 10. CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES
OWNER ea—tedga ti d aaammry b oV altausd v rgsew aro
u telOmem4 b ata oa0va0o. and Iuintw" d Dn.wngs ala specACO-
DOnae.•IaMe•.c0a c"M-law"d w"Imw m De s etnowyem am -Go
platenainai aenr,ci! Gump Ne B100uq ants CamDuc0w. Phaaa at me
Prge4 (11 m nt4rVet ants Cutty tM dOCYlonwml. 50 turnpnets 00 m
mDalp me Hanle At, c n%,na Ancae rewa aunrlg brmtq ants CCnIli
ton Tey alCtm, Q11 COMeCao -dnacceaditlO Of MXSMe w w-aual
itema at inat Gnats arm eaulpllHm pnOOosed Dy 040M and COntrUmn a 1.
(7) In donMaton VFO apawW d snap arwtugl aro sarnwa auonuttam.
and (a) AS a naso of ret in raoata m MDAS dwsating In aawnce at
perblllarm a WWM awk inmMtalel.oa a wmguiwu" in Iucn
aCtai,m amt. OWNER agfea osl II MDA a not err.Omyed m MOVICe
0rfan prasemwr owtewa durng me Boding (d bswak o put wt b best
and os CarlmuucWn Phases of ole Prgea. TKDA will ml be raOWIAOIe
kat and OWNER &W atow rnIt, ana JIM TKOA lana TKOAS prawdnat
aasodmearraOW WWm)hwffomnomacumdamqmownlants
--tetudagallct y'neamtgouta.vreantmgImrearty In
a --,. anrdlvoon. wa0r0dn SaClpwrlD♦ 10100 alawu.Q w 118M1
pr aoplcwl C.", of anal doarmw.morl awed w nme0 Out
DyOWNEA or amen Nmmg avatea N dna urpa )rwsobecoewsa
torwas MDA (w TKOAS adeaalal aemase v tpnaulalnl horn
(swaiy b aro, m Our10rm m raaavanawrm prolwmw.r 6talgaRa aril
awry w raeDnerwary wncn TKDA no unaaraital w aewna ur10ar this
AWOB.wa
ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE
MDA SW oaciim Ana 11-10- iM Milli b 0rOscma. hon Cam
agatm t undo tttllkera' mlpw®1 am. clam, b danega oeauaa
all b0tah d%Ury atduding peran-1 UWrV. lanae Of dada a pea- a
arty am ad pnp10yea a of arty pecan umsr than audit antaoYel. and
mom clam agalM a or durrge basua d Irkury at a 0a-Dudgn 01
wbaeny maardatg lout of uaa rewlwq plrwnarrl.
Aso. TKOA shad wmww and Cla-a1 adeaawlal daaaty Illwlalrw car
protomm haIDc4N0 analg an d pwbmelCe d aaaemnia eenrca
cau0a by any Mglgem am "C".
w ananm Inl
car cn Ma lry
OA aga
Haute HowwAK TKDA lw." cava ra vo OWNER ackm.sagw car
TXCAUnD ta^e Teb+ry4e"'!rm slayrall.attrwaI-nnIn mwnrto.
aro a unawe w reanery Como
"'anl aintIj a Jar Cate aM1g out
clale Daremwl0 v atWn o al/ann pldwOdlal sla.oel'Mckia lg Der
net Iknasd m tts WWWaUM d n i daagla driatti and eaaalla•
tuna mum o IM Inyeago on, asCOon, anoten . rasce-em.
mowAaml, IwnD"M Orataar at (1) DCWansor all a M DMUCnmmra
a
v wo00 Ctsnwlrg aeba Paa101e tiwn urow (1) all"neuneq
rq wfa dram Q•aw+a v elamr stun v mmtsrrt-rno-gmals
"OM won -Osla wnwnaa aro h0lamn or unc wwa Wpm uor0ee
netsrtaa m 00 n! X . Ie'.d.010a1a 01 Iaclnmsa. "'"""A Ina
OWNER handy apps to Orap m stun or nap. wm weer. d araaCL
In oww" Cr anw nam, Awbn agalne TKDA is Mnaloua emO.oyeea
again am mraunam d RandalmIA am aany nee out a me saw slag
tow Waebnad dischaga Oa0en t, trete a "am at PO Wvn. o
the mwOgawnd a rer
neam won rem van a
wnual.O a apaema
In tlsg
Pai Tys OWNEA Mer amaa m Desna. Ineannmy and MC
TKDA am al wenwaa sinina ee agi m are mnsuruln hamle" Iron
arty such oawum w ambo nwam cmn me may a on0ugn cy m.n
arms e srw1 d ae ca atwm ontay.ea by TKDA pwar mw Agra►
-era Nawetmmap os aDaea a•OWNER ansa M M PMatidad hon
D Wig sus ago" TKDA b Ia aPega nogtgwla bMWM d arrow
v cpr awes of even rmlgow at a p alwasa hal woo rwxw din
mesaw era on assign was datsuaol at Dasm er eymna w n
diem.plalwe aro aeelep eye"ne ulalahq alma reaNtq Indum ai
m DAaeawe
wein eODoarm as EPA ataltale. 1110. OWNER M
Cusp m earth arta fold hWWdM TKOA b CvtM and nodi DnugM
algwm d by ata mica Nwv aro at dual wowaal" a -K=
CrmlCma of Insurano will be tllDardea b ns OWNER uan swat
ARTICLE 13. ASBWNAIGR
rho Aw-enme, being Inun0a0 a awn Os DwWNII ealdCe a me In
d W*AMWn0101a IN, re 9M.0 plan MDA 08AWM rods .Werner
aha M be awww, aubw w tranwwnea I nfan me Inman canaenit a
tne OWNER.
ARTICU11 CONTROLUWOLAW
The Awe-wtwe IS to as gmrn a by me ser at ma Saul at katuleaa
AMICLA ta. NOWDOCRrINATION
TKDA Ira Carly Inca IM 110rali N d aODWAtift saerr. lav ata eta1
swuuL aawsrtteu eta legutaaoa plowing a human ogle arm
Mn4bOin1in0a1.
&I
0
VEHICLE
DEPT.
DIMENTIONS
L -W -H
SO F
1
1972 INT.1800
S/C
16'6"X8'4"X9'3"
137
2
1988 FORD L-8000
ST
26'8"X9'10"X10'2"
W/PLOW
31' 306
3
1985 INT.
ST
23'9"X10'6"X10'11"
W/PLOW
28' 294
4
1986 936 CAT LOADER
ST
23'8"X8'7"X12'
201
5
1984 DODGE P.U.
WWTP
6
1983 CHEV. VAN
+ WT
17'6"x7'3"X7'2"
126
7
1976 INT.IND.LOADER
ST`
18'3"X6'6"XB'4"
118
8 j
1978 ELGIN SWEEPER
ST
16'X8'10"X11'
166
9
1989 FORD 1 TON
ST
19'X10'X9'
W/PLOW
20'6 205
10
1988 TORO
* PK
10'2"X7'X6'7"
70
11
1978 INT.1800
ST
22'7"X10'10"X10'4"
W/PLOW
27' 294
12
1985 650 JOHN DEERE
PK
8'10"XS'X6'
14
14
1975 ASPLUND CHIPPER
* TR
13'10"X7'X7'
97
15
1988 FORD P.U. (RED)
* ST
17'10"X7'6"X6'6"
134
16
1980 244 13OLENS
PK
12'3"X4'1"X6'5"
16
17
1981 MEYERS JET
S/C
18
1987 FORD P.U.
* ST
15'10"X7'6"X6'6"
119
19
1975 SNO-RID BLOWER
ST
8'8"X7'6"X10'
OWN 2
65
20
1963 CAT 140G GRADER
ST
29'4"x11'6"x11'8"
336
21
1978 DYNA-PAC ROLLER
• ST
6'6"X3'6"X4'7"
23
22
1979 HOMELITE TAMPER
• ST
23
1980 LAFONT SPLITTER
• TR
10'X6'X3'8"
60
24
1980 MORBARK DEBARKER
* TR
12'6"X8'4"X7'8"
104
25
1980 MEYERS SPRAYER
• PK
8'8"X4'7"X5'5"
39
26
BUCKET MACHINE (LOADER)*
S/r,
A'x5, R"xR'3"
45
27
BUCKET MACHINE (PULLER)•
S/C
7'8"X5'6"X5'4"
42
28
FLEXIBLE ROODER
S/C
16'X7'7"X7'7"
120
29
HOMELITE BLOWER
• S/C
30
HOMELITE MUD PUMP
• ST
31
PIPE PUSHER
• WT
32
1984 SINKS SPRAYER
• ST
33
TAR POT (SMALL)
• ST
34
1980 MOPECO BLOWER
• ST
35
1981 INT. SLUDGE APP.
WW1P
36
1981 INT. SLUDGE NURSE
WWTP
37
1989 FORD P.U. (BLUE)
• WT
17'10"X7'6"X6'6"
134
38
1983 CHEV 1 TON
S1
18'XB'4"X7'
150
39
1946 CHEV FIRE TRUCK
PK
23'X7'4"X7'3"
168
40
1986 HONDA MOWER
• PK
6'9"X3'7"X3'6"
23
41
1981 CHEV C-70
GT
23'7"X11'X9'2"
W/PLOW
28'6 313
42
VERMEER TREE SPADE
• PK
16'x7'8"X9'6"
122
43
TEEL TRASH PUMP
• S1
S'X3'3"X2'6"
16
44
GRIZZLEY BACKHOE
• ST
7'X9'8"X6'4"
68
45
TAR POT (LARGE)
• ST
46
1990 JOHN DEERE 955
PK
12'XS'x7'
60
47
TRAC-VAC
• PK
8'X3'4"X5'5"
26
48
1983 SULLAIR COMP.
ST
11'X5'3"X6'3"
58
49
ROLLER TRAILER
• 51
10'X6'X3'
60
50
TRANSPORT TRAILER
• PK
24'9"X8'3"X3'
206
51
PAINT TRAILER
• ST
12'8"X4'2"X3'6"
104
52
HONDA TRAILER
• PK
11'2"X5'7"X3'
61
0
PUBLIC WORKS STUDY ISSUES
Street and Park
1. Shop space for down equipment vs. storage
2. work area, press, grinder, saw, etc
3. Welding area with ventilation
4. Washing area
5. Sandblasting combination use area
6. Painting
7. Chemical storage
8. Vehicle storage
9. Equipment storage, large S small
10. Material storage
11. Covered sand/salt storage
12. Recycling area, hazardous waste?
13. Vehicle underbody hoist capabilities
14. Underground vs. aboveground fueling
(gas does not have cathodic• protected tank)
15. Feasibility of adding on to existing masonry building
16. Masonry vs. pole barn construction
17. Parts 5 tool room
18. Traffic patterns 6 site security
19. Training, -meetings room
20. Lube b grease bay with automatic dispensers
21. Material pickup areas for customers (compost, tree chips, etc)
Water/Sewer Collections
1. Vehicle and equipment storage
2. Material storage
•wG•�;r;/:p ; by � \ +J.s'..Y••.•. .. •,*�.H ,..: t••tc N9i(.
j - �.wr• :reL -. .y�
.... 5�u1T��?r+}\.• �!. - �4���.y Liy \\ -.,� r.�.},•�:.•.'... :�r�:�t�•-.. �nw. itrintnn.nrl ' - S... tt PL•M.r
•r;tr`%µ,# .e. "'ahs \� 'braa ;yw(',, .• ., � Una Qi t66t°,c.:. t[*f .�. .i .nn
:}j:, ; --:. - ..,, .,.:'.• Q.�uat!.Itu.lnt��"!i.� _Hunt_ Y'aetta
-
. 4�,t1, 'gi'ri • - tnni S. 3503.3 it+st
-
twr r0 len tni
.. r„ .. o�1*4
'a
M lao InOe c
. 't' •�: ' >n -O i�.'.'.Ca ll.IQ'—•--=r=-•-� o� 4etnttW. $100 stoo
'� e: i .�i'w° b• ` R+ +r.,txt>� n,lle.l 6110.16
o.
M tin.�r� • e'tun
/, "• tit }t,wpW � .t ut, '.1:,� �
i ' i:• \ , ``�
r` t ( C woHnit�eU) ,�
II
sra�• i •# +�.� +,,, tiR i�� tQ`RA a.• "t,1'^. � 513.0 I`,•s »....•.
silt IIA.
Y77
ti:..,�%r. x!1�.�;°. ;•moi-�..,._
Council Agenda - 7/8/91
B. Consideration of expansion of City Hall parkinq lot. (J.S.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At the last meeting, it was the consensus of the City Council
that the preferred parking lot expansion should follow
plan 93. Suggestions were made to delete the westerly
circular driveway which created the island around the
transformer and to delete the center island on which the
existing locust tree was located. The Council directed staff
to prepare an additional drawing of the new modified plan 13.
It was also suggested that the small white house be shown on
an additional drawing to determine if the house could stay and
the parking lot could be built in two phases.
The two new plans are enclosed for your review. Some
additional concerns have come up which will need further
consideration.
The first item is the telephone pedestal located just south of
the existing parking lot. This pedestal is located on a large
carrier line which runs east and west across the city
property. As far as we know, there are no existing dedicated
easements for this telephone line. The pedestal itself is
located at a point where the City's telephone service is
connected. Although we need to do some sealing of the service
conduit to prevent water from running into the City Hall
basement, it appears that it would be costly to relocate the
pedestal.
The other item is in regard to internal landscaped areas or
Island delineators. City ordinance requires internal island
delineators equal in size to a single parking lot space and
bounded by concrete curbing in any parking lot over 5,000 sq
ft. The area that was originally on plan 13 around the
transformer and the locust tree island may have nearly met the
ordinance requirements for internally landscaped island
dolineators, as they were part of the parking lot and were
curbed. If all of the islands aro to be deleted from the
parking lot, we would be required to obtain a variance and
state the non-financial hardships under which the variance
should be granted.
In regard to the demolition of the two homes, I obtained a
ballpark figure from a local contractor. The cost of
demolishing the Cola house (the largo home) and disconnecting
the sower and water services would be approximately $5,000.
It is anticipated that the existing garage would remain. For
the smaller house (the white house near City Hall), the cost
10
Council Agenda - 7/8/91
would be slightly less at approximately $3,500, which would
include disconnection of sewer and water services. It appears
that neither home could be economically relocated.
We have put together two estimates for the parking lot
expansion. The first estimate would include the construction
of the parking lot complete with demolition of both homes.
The second cost estimate would be to build the parking lot
expansion in phases and allow the existing small white home to
stay until such time phase II of the parking lot is needed.
It may be inappropriate to rent out the house for residential
use with the parking lot encroaching on the north and west
sides during this period of time, but the house could be
utilized for City purposes or other commercial functions until
such time it is demolished or phase II of the parking lot
expansion is built.
COST ESTIMATES
3A. FULL PARKING LOT EXPANSION (includes demolition of
both houses)
1. Demolition of houses $ 8,500
2. Parking lot construction 11,500
3. Restoration (sod 6 seed) 1,000
4. Trees, 6 @ $200 each 1,200
5. Perimeter lighting 7,000
(4 new poles 6 fixtures)
6. New telephone service and
relocate pedestal 2,000
7. Storm sewer 3,000
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $34,200
3B. PHASED PARKING LOT EXPANSION
PHASE I
1. Demolition of Cole house $ 51000
2. Parking lot construction 9,200
3. Restoration (sod 6 seed) 1,000
4. Trees, 4 @ $200 each 800
5. Perimeter lighting
(3 now poles 6 fixtures) 5,250
6. Now telephone service and
relocate pedestal 2,000
7. Storm sewer 3,000
PHASE I ESTIMATED COST $26,250
OD
Council Agenda - 7/8/91
PHASE II (ADDITIONAL COST)
1. Demolition of small white house $ 3,500
2. Parking lot construction 3,000
3. Restoration (sod & seed) 300
4. Trees, 2 @ $200 each 400
5. Perimeter lighting
(1 @ $1,750) 1,750
TOTAL PHASE II ADDITIONAL EST. COST $ 8,950
PHASE I AND PHASE II: $35,200
As can be noon by the above estimates, the cost of demolition
of both houses and complete construction of the parking lot
with all the amenities is not cheap at $34,200. With the
actual design of the facilities, we may be able to cut some
cost, and we will have a better handle on the exact prices.
The City could be the general contractor and quote out all
different phases of the work or develop a set of
specifications and bid the work all together as one project.
(� If the decision is made to keep the small white house for City
use for the future, phase I of plan 3B could be utilized.
This staging of the parking lot construction is not expected
to significantly increase the overall cost.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Open to suggestions.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Open.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copies of plane 3A and 3B. Please refer to plans 1-5 from
previous Council mooting'@ agenda.
12
BROADWAY
r4
W
NO 7
...... .....
V,
BLOCK D ORIGINAL PLAr
MOLW15ELLO. MN.
310 Sr
\-� BROADWAY
I
�Ll4nl 3 �
0
• J
CL
NOTE
[�IaCITr or vl Ml[l [7
as:
I
BLOCK 0 ORIGINAL PLA r
Li MONTICF"0. MN.
Sep ST ..:�='•'�� fe.°--
I�ep•3
Council Agenda - 7/8/91
9. Consideration of improvements or replacement of the
information center/museum/public restrooms. (J.S.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At the last meeting, City Council asked staff to examine the
existing information center/museum building to see if it could
be remodeled and added onto with new restrooms to serve as not
only the information center but also as offices for the
Chamber of Commerce. Gary, Roger, and I examined the
buildings and site and found that the existing information
building is structurally sound and could be added onto. A
site drawing of existing conditions is provided for your
review.
First, as we discussed at the last meeting, the existing
restroom building will require significant repairs, especially
to the flooring, and it is, therefore, recommended that this
small building be demolished. It will be necessary to re -
stucco the wall of the building behind the restrooms in order
to blend in with the remaining portion of that building. The
existing information center building, however, Is structurally
sound. The building is of block construction and appears to
be built on a concrete block foundation. The interior walls
of the building have been stripped and lined with an
attractive panoling and a suspended ceiling hung in place. It
appears that with the remodeling several years ago, a
secondary floor was poured over the old concrete floor and is
in satisfactory condition. The building does need, however,
new doors, windows, and ceiling insulation, along with boxing
of the eaves with low -maintenance materials. The existing
wood trim and stucco finish could be repaired at a low cost.
Since the City owns only a couple feet to the south and a
couple feet to the west of the existing building, the addition
will have to go to the north and would consist most likely of
a furnace/utility room, two handicapped bathrooms for men and
women, and a hall or entry way accessible from the inside for
the information center and frum the outside for the general
public. The existing heat in the Information center
consisting of a gas hanging furnace would than be replaced
with a forced air up -flow furnace with air conditioning to
servo as not only the rostrooms but also the information
center as well. we expect that the addition size would be in
the area of 216 eq ft. The remaining area of the site could
be landscaped with a combination of exposed aggregate, sitting
benchas, and a flower garden. It is possible that the
existing fountain may be spruced up and loft in place. Tho
Council Agenda - 7/8/91
plumbing for the fountain, however, would have to be totally
redone, as it is located in the small cellar under the
restroom facilities.
Because of the time frame involved, no estimates have been
made for the cost of the construction. If after reviewing the
information presented here the Council wishes to proceed with
the reconstruction of this corner, it is suggested that a
committee be set up to work out the details and refinements of
the building additions and landscaping.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to have the Council move
to develop plans for remodeling the existing museum
adding new bathrooms, demolishing the old restroom
facilities, and redo the site landscaping. A building
committee as set by the Council could work with staff and
Possibly OSM's architect on a time and material basis to
develop plans for review by the Council at another
meeting.
2. The second alternative would be to perform the
maintenance required to keep the existing bathrooms and
museum/ information center in service. The estimated cost
of these expenditures has been budgeted at $3,000.
3. The third alternative would be to do nothing at this time
but to continue as we are without any maintenance or
improvements. This does not appear to be practical, as
the existing restrooms need significant repair to the
floors, and the building does need exterior maintenance.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Since it appears that the existing information center building
is suitable for remodeling, and the Council has indicated that
this building could also serve as the Chamber's office, it
seems appropriate to select alternative O1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of drawing of existing site conditions.
14
t0• CONCRETE ( •••-
•LLE•
DENTIST
INFORMA
CENTER
f
PINE ST. (HWY 25)
4
J
y�
� Y4
��� � ��... I.,.. pEBTannNS ••, I --3—
3 :Sg w �• �°
ISL
INE+. BLOCK 35 ORIGINAL PLAT
Council Agenda - 7/8/91
to. Consideration of concurrence with Wright County to post "no
varkinp" along County Road 117 east of Hiqhway 25. (J.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At the last Council meeting, staff presented information to
the City Council regarding Wright County's proposal to post
"no parking" signs on County Road 117 just east of Highway 25.
Council's recommendation at that time was to notify all
businesses along County Road 117 between Chelsea Road and
Highway 25. A letter was sent asking those property owners
for their input. They were also informed that the Council
will consider this item at the July 8 Council meeting.
it is still City staff's contention that parking of large
trucks along County Road 117 on the paved shoulders could
conflict with bicycle or pedestrian traffic in the area.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to concur with Wright
County on the posting of "no parking" along County
Road 117 east of Highway 25.
2. The second alternative would be not to concur with Wright
County in regard to the posting of "no parking" along
County Road 117.
3. The third alternative could be to ask Wright County to
post only one side of County Road 117 as "no parking"
based upon input from property owners.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
it is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the
City Council concur with Wright County in its proposal to post
County Road 117 as "no parking" east of Highway 25 as outlined
in alternative 11.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of original letter from Wright County; Copy of letter to
property owners.
15
WRIGHT COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
Wright County Public Works Building
Route No. 1 • Box 91.B
Buffalo, Afinnesoto 55313
Jct. T.X. 25 and C.R. 138
Telephone (612) 682-7383
May 28, 1991
John Simola
Public Works Director
City of Monticello
250 E. Broadway
P.O. Box 1147
Monticello, MN 55362
Re: Traffic Concerns CR 117 Monticello
Dear John:
WAYNE A. FINGALSON. P.E.
High -,y Env—,
682 7-388
DAVID K. MONTEBELLO. P.E.
Assistant High—y Env -
6827787
RICHARD E. MARQUETTE
Right of Way Agent
6827386
The purpose of this letter is to make you aware of a number of
traffic concerns that were expressed to me by Jenny Hoglund. They
relate to the segment of CR 117 between Chelsea Lane and T.H. 25.
These concerns are as follows:
(1) Speed:
CR 117 has a posted speed limit in this area of 35 MPH.
Jenny has indicated to me that she feels that the majority of
vehicles are traveling much faster. I have requested that the
Sheriffs Office do a speed check in this area to determine the
actual vehicle speeds. In addition, to this Jenny mentioned
that she feels that the speed limit should be lowered to 30
MPH. She compared this area to Chelsea Lane which is posted
at 30 MPH and has no side street traffic between the
industrial Park and CR 118. I indicated to her that this area
to my knowledge was not posted with an authorized speed limit.
I believe that motorists are not respecting these signs in
this area and the City should consider properly zoning Chelsea
Lane so that we have some consistency between our etreat
systems.
The area of CR 117 between Chelsea Lane and TH 25 is
close to meeting the standards of what is termed an "urban
district". This would allow for a reduction to 30 MPH if the
County determined that it would be an enforceable limit.
(2) Parking:
Currently there are no prohibitive parking signs along CR
111. Jenny Hoglund indicated that many times large trucks
park along the street in front of Tom Thumb or McDonalds while
they run in and make purchases. This restricts eight distance
to those who use the entrances. Both facilities have the
space to accommodate these trucks with off-street parking.
The County is recommending that no parking signs be
placed along these areas to prohibit perking at all times.
The County likes to have City concurrence on all parking
restrictions which affect businesses etc. within the City. we
request that you discuss this issue and forward to us your
recommendations.
(3) No Passing on Shoulder:
Jenny Hoglund also mentioned that passing on the right or
going around vehicles that are making left turns is a problem.
This has become a common maneuver for most motorists and one
can frequently see this occurring at every intersection. This
maneuver is not what I would term dangerous if done properly
but many motorists do not take adequate care when making this
maneuver. The Sheriffs Office has indicated that they do not
actively pursue or cite motorists for these actions unless
they are passing moving traffic on the right and are reckless
in their scticnc. we will be disc,seing this further in-house
/ before we commit to making additional signing changes.
If you have questions concerning this please contact me
Sincerely,
D...... � -za
Dave Montebello, P.E.
Assistant County Engineer
Enclosure: Sign Inventory Lieting
pc: Wayne FSngalson, Co. Engr.
Jenny Hoglund
Pat Sawatzke, County Commissioner
Bill Cordell, Traffic Tech
DM/jas
250 East Broadway
P. O. Box 1147
Monticello, MN
55362-9245
Phone: (612) 295.2711
Metro: (612) 333.5739
Fax: (612) 295.4404
Re: Wright County installation of "no parking" Signe along County Road 117
Dear Sir or Madam:
The Wright County Highway Department has contacted the City of Monticello
�. in regard to posting "no parking" signs along County Road 117 from
Highway 25 to the east.
The City Staff concurs with the restriction of parking along County
Road 117, as each business by ordinance is required to have Sufficient off-
street parking, and the paved Striped Shoulders would be much safer for
pedestrians and bicycles if parking was prohibited.
Prior to the City Council taking action to approve the posting of no
parking by the County, we would like to have your input. This item will be
formally addressed by the City Council at 7:00 p.m., July 8, in the City
Council Chambers. please feel free to contact City staff, Council members,
or the Mayor, or attend the meeting and give your input.
If you have any questions, or if we may be of any assistance, please
contact us.
Respectfully,
C T OF MO TICELLO
ohn E. Slmola
Public Works Director
JES/kd
ccs Ken Maus, Mayor
Rick wolfstellor, City Administrator
Dave Montebello, Asst. County Engineer
Pat Sawatzko, County Commissioner
Filo t/ I
it
CITY Of MONTICELLO
Monthly Dullding Department Report
Month of lune
19 91
PM14ITS MID USES
PERMITS ISSUER
LaaL
This
Dema Month Lent Year
Thin Year
Menta}'
Month June
Last Year To Data
To Data
RESIDENTIAL
Numbor
17
18
18
65
58
valuntl on
9 {00,500.00
5 147,200.00
S 438,900.00 S
979,600.00
5 904,600.00
Pp..
3,703.50
1, 266.Ot
3,537.37
0,133.08
6,929.14
surcharge.
190.50
70.60
217.45
400.85
444.05
COMMERCIAL
number1
2
4
1J
8
voluatlon
1,500,00
36,500.00
115,700.00
2,560,700.00
113,000.00
FOOD
15.00
578.05
1,406.52
14,252.71
1,288.05
Surcharges
.50
18.00
57.60
1,279.60
55.75
I "DUSTR I Ai.
ILOO
1
3
i
veluatlon
22,000.00
98,600.00
27,000.00
Fa..
225.00
1,091.31
225.00
Surcharge.
11.00
49.30
11.00
P"JMDiNG
Number
7
2
9
20
15
Peas
15{, 00
46.00
204.00
485.00
365.00
Lurchargaa
3.50
1.00
4.50
10.00
7.50
OTHERS
Number
5
velvet/on
95,000.00
Peon
1,090.80
0-1-g..
49.00
TOTAL NO. PERMITS
25
23
31
106
02
TOTAL VALUATIOM
402,000.00
205,700.00
554,600.00
3,733,900.00
1,039,600.00
TOTAL FARS
3,272.50
2,075.06
5,142.09
25,052.00
0,007.19
TOTAL SUPENARGrIl
202.50
100.60
279.35
1,868.75
518.30
CURRENT MURTh
'
'DI
to— to INTO
PIAMI1' NAllmr..
Number PERMIT GullmlARG6 Valuation
This year
Lees Yen,
01.01. ready
7 S
055.01 5 53.85
6 107,700.00
11t4
Dupl..
I
0
Multi -family
U
0
caev.a rclel
0
5
Ind. s-1.1
0
1
Ilaa. G -U.4
I
50.00 2.50
5,000.00
2
2
a, un.
0
0
ro,ndinu.
0
1
ALTERATION OR RLPAIR
livalling.
9
271.00 11.25
25,500.00
20
37
Cae...i .tai
2
338.05 18.00
30,300.00
0
8
Indne1.1.1
1
223.00 11.00
27,000.00
1
2
PLUNDING
All Type.
7
46.00 1.00
IS
20
ACCESSORY OTRUCTUrtes
a.I -lug Pool.
0
WOA•
6
90.00 3.00
0,000.00
16
1
12
TEMPORARY PERMIT
0
0
DOIOLITION
0
J
TOTALS
23 21075.06 100.60
205,700.00
Bi
106
TOTAL REVIEW 62,175,66
C-
J
J
INDIVIDUAL PERMIT ACTIVITY REPORT
Month of June 1991
PERMIT
I
OE SCR I PTI
TYPE
HAML/IACATION
VATION I
ALU
PLE'
NUMBER
I
PERMITSURCHARGE
PLUMBING SURCHARGE
91-1669
Intarlor G aKtarlor raaodel
AD
Michael G Cheryl Chandlar/126 Balboul Cir
51,500.00
SIS.00
5.50
91-1670
Deck
AD
Thomas G Mary Bt. Nllelra/331 nlssl sslppl
Ir. 1.500.00
15.01
.50
91-1671
Dock
AD
Gery G Teme ra Kieft/1100 Meedov oak Ur.
1,wu.VO
1D.UL
.5J
91-1672
Deck
AD
Harlan G KaI ley Xemaon/2841 Oak view La
1,500.00
15.0c
.50
91-167)
Building roroof
Al
Sunny Preen roods/206 W. 4th St.
72,000.00
225.0(
11.00
91-1674
Deck
AD
Jerry G Patricia Wain/511 L. )rd St.
1,500.00
15.0E
.50
91-1675
Attached garage
RG
Brute 6 Ellen Bakken/101 Hillcrest Cl,
5,000.00
50.0(
2.50
91-1676
Rebuilding roof
AC
Brad Leraon/134 W. eroadvey
1,500.00
15.01
.50
91-1677
House G garage raroof
AD
Thomas G Panels Lindquist/120 Hillcrest Rd
1,500.00
15.0E
.50
91-1618
Dacka
AD
Kevin G Mary Nook/71S L. Rlvar St.
1.500.00
15.0(
.50
91-1679
Building addition footings G
Monticello -Big Lake Communt[y
foundation only
AC
Hoag+tel/101) Hart Blvd
]l. 000.00
)17.00
17. 50
91-1680
House end garage
ar
Value Plus Nomas/104 Crocus Clr
56,800.00
400.59
28.40
71.00 .50
91-1M181
Ilousa and 0arapa r -I
AD
Richard G Vickie Vanorny/404 Riverview Dr
1,500.00
15.00
.50
91-1682
storage out lding
AD
Tessy ",pert/408 K2alloarg at Trl Pk
1,!00.00
15.00
.50
91-168)
House raroof
AD
Ploranca Tapper/)7) W, atn Bt
1,500.00
15.00
.50
91-1684
Daseaent finish
AD
Stevan G Lauda Hanson/200 MlaelsslPP1 Dr
),000.00
10.00
1.50
91-1685
Nouse edditlon G deck
AD
Gene G Debra Justus/548 E. eroedvey
11,000.00
126.00
5.50
91-1686
Nouse c garage residing
AD
Earl G Nancy Kcon/2800 Oskvlaw La
7,500.00
25.00
1.25
91-1687
Deck
AD
Linde Polley/206 Mervin Clwood Rd
1,500.00
15.00
.50
91-1600
Gar apo rerooI
AD
Marto Jaslson/224 E. 4th Bt
I,500.n0
15.00
.80
91-1689
House G garage
HP
Value Plus Hoses/111 Crocus Clr
50,200.00
)76.69
75.4!
21.00 .50
TOTALS
5205,700.00
51,745.28
699.60
646.00 61.00
PLAN REVIEW
91-1679
building addltlon footings G
Monticallo-gip lata Common lty
foundation only
AC
Hospital/101] Hart Blvd
206.05
91.1600
House G garage
Bt
velua Pius (loses/104 Crocus Cir
40.06
91-1609
(lou •e G ge rap•
SP
Vel tie Plus Hoag•/111 Cronus Cl,
)7.67
TOTAL PLAN REVIEW
8'� 6
TOTAL REVIEW 62,175,66