Planning Commission Agenda Packet 04-14-1981AGENDA
REGULAR. MEETING - MONTICE110 PLAN17ING COMMISSION
Tuesday, April 14, 1981 - 7:30 P.M.
Chairman: Jim Ridgeway
Members: John Boodhus, Bill Burke, Dict Martie, Ed Schaffer.
1-A. Approval of Minutes - Regular Meeting of February 10, 1981.
(As you recall, there was no regular meeting held in March.)
1. Public Hearing - Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit
Request for Charles-Ritse.
2. Public Hearing - Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit
Request - Vance Plorell.
3. Public Hearing - Consideration of Rezoning Request by Mal
Wolters in The Meadows Subdivision Plat.
4. Public Hearing - Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit
Request (Re -Bearing) for Medical facilities Company.
Unfinished Business -
New Business -
Meeting Reminder -
The next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning
Commission will be Tuesday, May 12, 1981.
Planning Commission - 4/14/81
AGENDA SUPPLEMEM
I. Public Hearing - Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit ReQuest,for
Charles Ritse.
Charles Ritze has made an application for a conditional use to do mining
(removal of gravel fill, etc.) as defined in Monticello ordinance 010-3-8.
A conditional use permit is required whenever the extraction of sand,
gravel, or other material from the land in the amount of 400 cubic yards or
more, and the removal thereof is to be done. Monticello ordinance requires
that the conduct of mining -ball be permitted only upon the issuance of a
conditional use permit within all zoning districts within the City.
The location of this proposed conditional use for mining is that part of the
RKY of the SA of Section 3, Township 121M. Range 25p. which lies south of
County Road 75, across from Ritse Mawr.
It is a staff recommendation that this permit be granted, contingent upon
a plan being furnished, showing a finished grade which will not adversely
affect the surrounding land or the development of the site on which the
mining is to be conducted.
It is Mr. Ritse's Latent that the fill which would-be removed from the
mining site would be transported over to a low area in Ritse Manor to
be used for fill to bring the lots up to the required grade. Both of
these areas which are owned by Mr. Ritge are soned as R-1.
APPLICANT: Charles Ritsa
CONSIDERATION: Consider recommending approval or denial of this conditional
use request with the above contingency regarding a plan being furnished.
REFERENCES: Map showing the location of the area from where the fill is
going to be removed and also shoving the area to where the fill will be
taken.
MC
Planning Commission - 4/14/81
2. Public Hearing - Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit Request - Vance
Florell.
Vance Florell, owner of the Freeway Standard Station, has made an application
for a conditional use permit to allow open and/or outdoor storage and/or sales
on the parcel of the I-94 Tri -Plaza where the Freeway Standard Station is
now located.
This property is zoned B-3.
Monticello Ordinance 610-13-4-(B) provides that open or outdoor service, sale
and rental as a principal or accessory use may be conducted in a B-3 zone,
provided that:
A. Outside services, sales and equipment rental connected with the princi-
pal uses is limited to 302 of the gross floor area of the principal
use. (This percentage may be increased as a condition of the conditional
use). umam % — Irt, 4•. V be. I - J.- E .a : K—
B. That the use does not take up parking space as required for conformity to
this ordinance.NM�s1 d silts �� 8 A
There are also other conditio.Gtcb irouleevail in allowing this condi-
tional use, but which are not applicable to this situation.
Due to the nature of Mr. Florell's proposed rental business, that is - U -Haul
Rental, and the size of his building, it would bn necessary as a condition of
this conditional use to.increase the 30Z of the gross floor arey gp the prin-
cipat use to a lamer kr((tturaLt wnlcn coma DR (e(grmr ea coo/pa■rerival by the
Fiaan.n@ �oamiselon ane R;, dloro11 However item 3, whrC11 sax eC Luis
.
formity of this ordinance, may be somewhat or a problem.
At this time, the Standard Station is providing the parking spaces which they
need for the operation of their business, with no axtras. Mr. Florell feels,
however, that even though they provide the required parking spaces in conformance
to what our ordinance requires, that there is not a need for all of those park-
ing spaces, and that there is adequate room for all of his customer parking,
etc. plus enough additional room to allow him to adequately provide U -Haul
rental from that property.
One item for consideration in that respect would be to limit the number of
U -Haul vehicles which would be allowed on the parcel, or to definitely
limit the number of square foot, or to specify the area which could be used
for U -Haul rentals.
One additional item which Mr. Floroll may be requesting at the meeting, in
addition to the above-mentioned subject, would be to allow an additional
pylon sign advertising the U -Haul rental. At the time of this writing,
Mr. Florell had not made a definite decision as to whether or not he would
be asking for this additional pylon sign, but should he request that, it
; ) +,� • S .
JA '• (A Z 1664, AOL is 94.L sr 511,4
is•o.
Planning Commission - 4/14/81
could possibly be recommended for granting on a temporary basis. If it were
recommended for being granted on a permanent basis, it would be necessary to
advertise for a variance at a public hearing.
APPLICANT: Vance Florell
CONSIDERATION: Consider recommending approval or denial of this conditional
use request.
REFERENCES: Enclosed map showing the area of the I-94 Tri -Plaza and also a
plat map of the I-94 Tri -Plaza shoving location of the Freeway Standard and
the existing parking spaces.
- 3 -
Planning Commission - 4/14/81
3. Public Hearing - Consideration of Rezoning Request by Mel Wolters in
The Meadows Subdivision Plat.
Mel Wolters, owner of The Meadows, is_proposing chayg-ing-the- zoniag_of
the Meadows from R-1 to R-2 for Lois 1-11, Blockf, ,Lots 1-9, Block 3;�
Lots 1-15, and Lot 24, Block 4, and ZOts 1 b 2', 1oZ" .
Mr. Wolters is making this proposal, based on his desire to locate zero
lot line duplexes on various lots throughout the Meadows addition.
Previously, Lots 1-14, Block 1 in The Meadows were rezoned to R-2 for
the same purpose.
Zero lot line duplexes, are those duplexes which are built on an indivi-
dual lot, and share a common wall, which becomes the property line when
the individual lot which contains the duplex is divided into two equal
parcels of 5,000 or more square feet each. (You may recall at a previous
meeting this was approved for Quintin Lanners on a duplex built on Ramsey
Street adjacent to the railroad. It was discovered at that time that
Monticello Ordinances do allow this type of a duplex on an R-2 lot,
without approvals being necessary.)
APPLICANT: Mel Wolters
CONSIDERATION: Consider recommending approval or denial of this rezoning
request.
REFERENCES: Enclosed map depicting the area of the Meadows and the lots
on which rezoning is requested.
�r
A pA
s
r4 ,Z
�i
1
D
�Z
Planning Commission - 4/14/81
Public Hearing - Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit Request (Re -Hearing)
for Medical Facilities Company.
On September 22, 1980, a public hearing on the rezoning and conditional use
for a proposed medical clinic east of the Monticello -Big Lake Community Hos-
pital was held. Monticello -Big Lake Community Hospital had requested
rezoning of Lots 1 6 13, and the West 33' of Lot 2, Block 22, Lover Monticello
and the east half of Oak Street lying between Blocks 22 and 23, Lover
Monticello, from R-1 to R -B. In addition to their rezoning request, the
Hospital had also made an application for a conditional use for a proposed
medical clinic.
At that meeting, it was noted that previously the City of Monticello had
received correspondence from neighbors in the Ellison Park area, expressing
concern with the possible extension of River Street to accommodate a parking
lot at the rear of the proposed medical clinic. At that time, the rezoning
request and the conditional use request for the clinic did not propose to
have River Street extended to meet the parking lot, but rather it was
designed to have the parking lot traffic enter and exist onto Hart Blvd.
At that time, the developer of the clinic indicated that if, for some reason,
Hart Boulevard could not be used as the entrance and access point to the
parking lot, he may approach the City for possible extension of River Street
to the rear of the parking lot.
At this time, it is the developer's intention to extend River Street to
allow access to the parking lot, thus the re -hearing is being held.
The Planning Commission, at their meeting prior to the September 22, 1980
Council Meeting, recommended approval of both the rezoning and conditional
use permit for the clinic, provided that the developers provide access
to the proposed parking lot from Hart Blvd., rather than opening up and
extending River Street.
At the September 22, 1980 Coune it Meeting, n unanimous vote carried to rezone.
Lots 1 b 13 and the West 33' of Lot 2, Block 22, and the cast half of Oak
Street lying between Blocks 22 and 23, from R-1 to R -B, and also, to approve
the issuance of a conditional use permit for the proposed medical clinic
contingent upon the proposed parking lot using Hart Boulevard as an access
and exit point. (This was done using Zoning Ordinance Amendment 9/22/80 086).
Enclosed with this agenda supplement is material relating to both the Planning
Commission Minutes dealing With this item in September of 1980, and the Council
Minutes dealing with this item in September 1980.
APPLICANT: Medical Facilities Company
CONSIDERATION: Consider recommending approval or denial of the amendment to
the conditional use which Would allow access to the parking lot off from
River Street if it is extended.
REFERENCES: Copy of September 1980 Planning Commission and Council Minuted
dealing with conditional tine proposed for amendment now, and map depicting area
around which the discussion for the amendment of the conditional use is being
diocuamed, and preliminary sketches of the proposed medical clinic and parking lot.
- 5 -