City Council Agenda Packet 05-10-1993Rw
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Monday, May 10, 1993 • 7 p.m.
Mayor: Ken Maus
Council Members: Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brad Fyle, Patty Olsen
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held April 26, 1993.
3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints.
4. Consideration of variance requests that would allow development of driveway
within the 5 -ft minimum setback area and allow construction of a canopy over
the clinic entrance. Location is Block 22, Lot 1 and west 1/2 of Lot 2, lower
Monticello.
5. Discuss the possibility of allowing the Hospital District to utilize a.5 R X 120
ft section of Hart Boulevard right-of-way for driveway and canopy post
location. Location is Block 22, Lot 1 and west 1/2 of Lot 2, bower Monticello.
6. Review of first quarter liquor store financial report.
7. Consideration of authorizing preparation of transportation plan.
8. Consideration of a resolution updating the Municipal State Aid Street System
fir the City of Monticello.
9. Consideration of purchasing it personal computer for Office Manager.
10. Consideration of update --An improvement to eastbound CSAH 75.
11. Adjournment.
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, April 26, 1893 - 7 p.m.
Members Present: Ken Maus, Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brad Fyle, Patty
Olsen
Members Absent: None
2. Consideration of anuroval of minutes of the reevlar meet,ine held Anril 12.
1993.
011ie Koropchak requested that item p4 be amended to include notice that the
public hearing was opened and closed.
John Sinxda requested that item #20 he detailed to indicate that Council
authorized that. City staff obtain quotes to repair or replace the digester steel
cover.
Item # 23 --Brad kyle requested clarification of the changes to the recycling
program its it relates to individuals receiving lifestyle exemptions from the
recycling program.
After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Pyle and seconded by Shirley
Anderson to approve the mect.ing minutes as amended. Motion carried
unanimously.
Citizens conn ents/vetit.ions, rerauesls, and comulaints
Wes Witt.kowski was in attendance to introduce himself its the new area
conUket person fur U.S. Representative, David Minge. Wittkowski outlined
constituents services that he provides on behalf of Minge. He noted that
currently his office is in Chaska; however, he may be opening an office in
Wright. County.
Consideration of it variance reuuesl to allow it detached accessory huildine to
he ulnced within the front vard setback reuuirement.. Auulicani. Allan Poach.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill informed Council that Poach would like to
construct an attached garage that is set hack :Ill ft from the right-of-way.
Under normal circumstances, :10 O meets the minimum setback; however, in
this case, the homes on the east and west sides of Ute Pouch propeny are set
hack 20 fl and HO ft apart respectively. Under our current city ordinance, the
setback for the Poach pruts,rty splits the difference between the 20 -ft and KO -fl
setback, which areolas it required setback of till fl.
I'age 1
Council Minutes - 4/26/93
O'Neill went on to note that the garage as proposed will he placed on the side
of the property closer to the building with a 20-f1 setback, which will reduce
the impact of the variance. In addition, moving the garage farther hack to
meet the sethack requirement would create drainage problems for the property.
O'Neill noted that the Planting Commission recommended that the variance
he granted.
O'Neill also reported that the property had recently leen used as a site for
construction of fish houses, which is notallowed in a residential zone. Poach
indicated that once he was informed that this activity was not allowable, he
discontinued construction of fish houses, and he plans to use his garage for
residential uses only.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by
Brad Pyle to grant a 20 -ft variance to the front yard setback requirement
based un the finding that requiring the applicant w meet the setback would
create a hardship, as it would result in drainage problems on the site. Also,
the variance is mitigated by the placement of the structure on the east side of
the property. Motion carried unanimously.
5. Consideration of reviewing open burning permit ordinance for possible
amendments or enforcement procedures.
City Administrator, Itick Wolfsteller, reported that the current ordinance is
somewhat contradictory in that itlists many ways open burning is allowed hilt
only if there is nut, ii reasonable, practical altenuitive method of disposid. With
this restriction available, it doesn't appear thatanyone should ever he getting
it burning permit„ since there is always an alternative method of disposal. It
may not he practiced or cost effective in the eyes of the applicant, but (,here ore
landfills that will take tree stumps and other materials that. people request.
burning permits for. Furthermore, recent hurning permits that have been
granted have opened the dour fir other request;.
Wolfsteller went un to note that because we have not adhered to all the
provisions of our ordinance in granting permits, sluff needs direction nn how
to proceed with future requests. lie noted that City staff feels that the
ordinance we have in place is better than allowing all burning tube permitted,
and the only provision that we cull acluully change and still he it local
authority to issue permits might he the 6110 -ft. distance limitation.
Wolfsteller suggested that the ordinance remain as is, and in the future,
burning permits should not he granted unless they meet the ordinance
requirements.
Page 2
Council Minutes - 4/26/93
Clint Herbst suited that burning permits should he allowed only fur burning
of trees or other vegetation moved from the site and Lha1 no building nrueriuls
should he it lowed to he- burned. Ken Maus added that whenever we g6ve u
permit, the material to he burned must. first he inspected for the presence of
construction materials.
After discussion, it motion was mndr by. Clint Herbst and seconded by Shirley
Anderson to reaffirm the existing ordinance wi th the added provision that any
burning permits issued include a $250 deposit to cover possible City
expenditures. Motion carried unanimously.
6. Consideration of amuroval of plans and stw6fivations fi,r IWM sealcoatine
Uroiect and authorization to adverlisc four hid..
John Simola reported that this year's scalamtingproject is somewhat sauttcred
across the community. It involves some of the streets which are love volume
and haven't been dune for quite some time. The hugest area includes portions
of the industrial park. This venr's project involves approximately 66,220 sq
yds of sealcuating arca. Twenty percent 12011 1 of this area is in n sidentiol
state aid streets. Based on :a estimated cost of $.50 per sq ft., including
sweeping, the total project cost would he ahotat $33,1110.
After discussion, a motion wits made Iw Shirley Anderson to approve the
specifications for the 1093 scalcoating project and authorize advertisement, for
bids at an anticipated project cost of $33,11111. Motion was seconded by fatly
Olsen and carried unartinutusly.
Consideration of ret>:tirs to or mulacentent of the second stnec dieester cover
Ili the wostewitter Ireatmonl plant,.
.John Simla reported that as authorized by Council, the second stage digester
cover and tap insulation was renwved. In addi tion, s:adhlasting of the inleriur
structure wascomplcled fit aid in insliection. Upon inspecliun, it wits lound
Owl the vertical skirting un the cover oppenrs to be valvttgeahle. The interior
truss work wosnol salvageahlc. It will not needcomplete replacenu•nt. There
aro numerous in -vas inside the steel roof that have it significant ttntount of
corrosion. This, coupled with the fact. that the remaining portions of the
I cusses the securely welded to the interior of the roof, will make r-plaamient
of the trusses alone very dillicult,. It uppenrs it( this time that it may he more
practical to replace the steel roof. If this is the rose, Ow only portion stdvaged
from the entire cover would 1w the outer skirt and .none of the supe cling
angle irons and beam work which keep the outer skin in it circular fount.
I huge :l
Council Minutes - 4/26/93
Simola went un to report that lire price to remove and repair the digester
cover, recoat the lank, repair the lank piping, and reinstall the cover will
amount to $101,000 and will have it life expectancy of about 10 ,years. The cost
to install a new cover with a more corrosion -resistant design would cost
approximately $190,000 and last 20 years.
Ken Maus was concerned about the reason for the excessive corrosion. He
wondered if the corrosion may have been caused by sulfuric acid entering the
site from an upstream source. He wondered if the City should have been more
aggressive in regulating sulfuric acid entering the site. Perhaps this expense
could have been avoided.
Kelsie McGuire indicated that it is difficult to pinpoint it single reason why the
corrosion (o curred. It could have resulted in part from incomplete coating of
the digesters to protect them from the hostile environment.
Council went on to discuss the existing capacity of the treatment plant. Ken
Maus asked if the repair or replacement needs to be incorporated into the
design of an expanded facility. Should long-range planning he dune now.
thereby assuring us that this investment, will have it lung -term heneficial
impact'!
.John Simola reported that the City wastewater treatment plant is at 7W of
its total design flow capacity. It is expected that the treatment plant will he
able to meet the needs of the Cilv for 4 to H years, depending on city growth.
The repair or replacement of the digester cover is needed with or without
future expansion of the facility.
Rick Wulfsteller reported that funds are available in the water tower project
bund fund and could he used to help finance the repair or replacement of it
portion ol'lhe digester covers, depending on the extent of repairs needed.
After discussion, it notion was Walde by Clint Herbst and seconded by Brad
kyle to reject the quotes received for repair oft he digester covers and authorize
development of plans and specifications for loth repair and replacement of the
digester cover. Motion carried unanimously.
Ken Maus directed the City Administrator W include the cost to develop it
wa4ewater treatment facilities plan in the preliminary budget for 1994.
K. Consideration ofanwndine personnel iolicv.
City Administrator, Tick Wulfstcller, explained that there currently is an
inconsistency between the personnel policy and the personnel section of the
city ordinance with respect to employee use of sick leave in the event of a
serious illness to a member of the immediate family. According to the city
Page 4
Council Afinutes - 4/26/93
ordinance, up to three days of sick leave was allowed to he used by an
employee in the event of a serious illness to it member of the immediate family.
on the other hand, the new language in the personnel policy does not allow un
employee to use sick leave to attend to an immediate family member. The
personnel policy states that employees are required to take vacation or leave
without pay for that. purpose. Wulfsteller requested that the City Council
review the inconsistency and establish an official policy.
Wulfsteller also noted that state statutues require that the City grant sick
leave to employees that need to attend to a child that is ill.
Ken Maus was concerned that it would he difficult to define what constitutes
a serious illness affecting an immediate family member. What type of
condition constitutes a serious illness?
After discussion, at motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by Shirley
Anderson that, sick leave should he used only for the employee's own illness;
therefore, the personnel policy can he left. as is and not amended tit this time.
Furthermore, the City Administrator is directed to take steps to amend the
city ordinance accordingly. Motion carried unanimously.
9. Consideration of amolication for carnival license. Amulicaut.. Monticello A7all
Merchants.
Hick Wulfsteller reported that the Monticello Mall Merchants Association has
applied for a license to allow a carnival to operate at the null property May 19
through May 23. The name of the carnival is Chuck's Amusements of Elk
River. In order to conduct the carnival, the City Council must first approve
the application for a carnival, circus, and traveling show license.
Gene Meeker, representing the Monticello Mall Association, was present to
describe the carnival. He noted that rides such its a small ferric wheel, it t-il(-
a-whirl, and smaller kiddie rides will he featured.
'rhe mnjor point of discussion centered around whether or not hi require it
$6,(1(10 surety fond to Ow Citv of Monticello. Wulfsteller noted Ihat a surety
hand insures (.hilt all applicahle federal, state, and city regulations are adhered
to and insures that the carnival meets till other city regulations and pays fur
tiny cunt associated with damage In city properly that could occur as a result
of the carnival. Wulfsteller pointed nut that there is only it remote lossihility
that any damage would occur to public property, its the carnival will he on
private propxrty.
Wulfsteller stated that (he site has liven reviewed for adequate parking, and
it appears that there will ho sufficient area availahle ou site fur Loth the
carnival activities and mall puking.
Ilage 5
Council Minutes - 4/26/93
After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by Patty
Olsen to approve the issuance of a carnival license to the Monticello Mall
Merchants Association and waive the daily fees by recognizing the Association
as a non-profit organization and waive the surety bond requirement. Motion
carried unanimously.
10. Consideration of bills for the month of April.
After discussion, a motion was made by Brad F'yle and seconded by Shirley
Anderson to approve paymentof the hills as submitted. Motion carried
unanimously.
11. Other matters.
Shirley Anderson indicated that the presence of the two-hour parking limit at
the East Bridge Park parking lot is unduly limiting the use of the parking lot.
She noted that citizens using the senior citizen's center are reluctant to park
in the East Bridge parking area and are, instead, parking on the street.
Anderson suggested that the two-hour parking limit should be adjusted to
allow senior citizens to use the parking area in conjunction with senior center
activities that last longer than two hours. Anderson suggested that an
adjustment to the East Bridge Park parking restrictions is in order.
After discussion, it was the consensus of Council to direct the City
Administrator t.) discuss the matter with the Wright County Sheriffs
Department and determine the best method for allowing more flexible use of
the East Bridge Park parking area for parking in conjunction with special
events at the senior citizens center.
Jeff O'Neill
Assistant Administrator
Page 6
City Council Agenda - 5/10/9:3
4. Consideration of variance requests: that would allow development of
a drivewav within the 5 -ft minimum setback area and allow
construction of a canopv over the clinic entrance. Location is Block
22. Lot 1 and West 1/2 of Lot 2. Lower Monticello. Applicant.
Monticello -Big Lake Communitv Hospital District.
I: ac
b. Discuss the Dossihility of allowing the Hospital District to utilize a b
ft X 120 ft section of Hart Boulevard right-of-wav for drivewav and
canopv Dost location. Location is Block 22. Lot 1 and West 1/2 of Lot
2. Lower Monticello. Applicant. Monticello -Big Lake Communitv
Hospital District. 1J.O.i
A. REFERENCE AN1111ACKCROUNll
As you recall, at the previous meeting of the City Council, the City Council
approved it conditional use permit and reviewed it proposal for extending it
driveway in front of the clinic entrance which would include construct ion of a
protective canopy. Variances necessary to allow drive and r iopy were
identified which pre now before the City Council for formal consideration.
Also tit the previous meeting, there was general discussion regarding the
proper widt.h of the drive. Friona functional standpoint, it, wits concluded that
it 24 -ft width is the hest alternative, as it provides efficient room to allow
vehicles to pass. The problem with this alternative is that it requires
extension of the drive area and canopy support posts onto city right-of-way.
The other alternative wits to reduce the width of the drive area to
a pproxinalely 19 A. which would eliminate the need to place the driveway and
posts on city right-of-way; however, the functionality, of the drive is
significantly reduced when it is reduced to 19 fi..
Under both alternalives. it rw A variance to the driveway sethack requirement
is necessary. In addition, it :30 it variance is necessary lit allow construction
of it canopy in the front yard area, as the city ordinance defines a canopy its a
structure; therefore, placement of the structure in the required front yard area
is not. permissihle without it variance.
A new strategy liar develupmenl of t he hospital district site has emerged, which
may resolve variance issues noted shove. Preliminary result: of planning
efforts conducted by City staff and the hospital district indicaw that it may
snake sense to vacate it major portion of Hart Boulevard and develop a new
entrance to the site offCtiAH 75 at a point approximately even with the clinic
City Council Agenda - 5/10/93
expansion area. If this plan is executed, the portion of Hart. Boulevard that
the canopy variances affect will no longer he public right-of-way; therefore.
there will he no need for the variances.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
DECISION I - VARIANCE RFa1UEsT
Motion to table the variance requests pending the outcome of planning
efforts. If Hart Boulevard is not vacated, then the variance requests
will be considered.
Under this alternative, City Council takes the view that it docs not
make sense to grant the variances as proposed in light of the fact that
the variances may not he needed anyway: therefore, this alternative
allows the City to avoid setting it precedent.
2. Motion to approve the variance requests.
Barb Schweintek has indicated haat the Hospital District needs the
issue resolved so that final plans can he prepared. The Hospital District,
cannot wail on the variance pending outcome of the planning study.
The City Council may he convinced that. it variance is appropriate with
or without the Hurt Boulevard street vacation: Iherefure, we should just
go ahead and grant the variances.
To mitigate the precedent, City Council could find that it variance is
uppruprinte to allow a driveway to encroach on it setback area because
the drive will improve the ahility of the site to serve ha ndicapped or
elderly that may have difficulty reaching the site without direct
vehicular transportation to the door.
This is the alternative that was selected by the Planning Commission.
:1. Motion to deny variance requests.
Under this alternative, City Council would argue that the applicant
hasn't demonstrated that the variance requests meet the criteria for
grunting it variance. It could he ar{paed that the site hits served seniors
and the handicapped for many years as is. Furthermore, tiny hardship
created as n result of poor original placement of the structure is due to
action taken by the prolwrl,v owner. A hardship created by the prvgwrty
owner is not it legitinvue hnsis for it variance.
City Council Agenda - 5/10/93
DECISION 11 - PRIVATE USE ON HART BOULEVARD
The City Attorney will be present. tA) discuss pros and cons associated with the
alternatives below.
1. Motion to direct staff tA) call for a public hearing on vacation of a 5 ft X
120 ft section of Hart Boulevard.
2. Motion to direct legal counsel to prepare agreements allowing use of 5
ft X 120 ft section of Hart Boulevard by the Hospital District.
3. Motion to deny use of city right-of-way for driveway.
Under this alternative and assuming the 5 ft variance is granted, the
driveway will he 19 fl wide, which is not ideal from a functionality
standpoint; but it may be preferable to giving up a portion of Hart
Boulevard. In the event. that Hart Boulevard is completely vacated in
the future, the Hospital District would have the opportunity to widen
the driveway at that time.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
With regard to the variance request., city sniff recommends that the item he
tabled pending completion of the planning effiirt.s, which could ultimately
result in vacation of Hart Boulevard. As a second alternative, staff would
recommend approval of the variance but only if the applicant expresses a dire
need to have this issue resolved prior to completion of the planning etudy.
With regard tA) the private use of Hart, Boulevard. staff recommendation is
pending receipt of input from the Pity Attorney which will be forthcoming at
the meeting.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Summary of staf 7hospital districl, meeting April 22, 1993; Copy of site plan.
250 East Broadway
P. O. Box 1147
Monticello, MN
55362.9245 MEMO
Phone: (612) 295-2711
Metro: (612) 333-5739
Fax. (612) 295-4404
TO: Barb Schwientek, Steve Grittman, Liz Stockman, Rick Wolfsteller, John Simola,
Gary Anderson, 011ie Koropchak, Bret Weiss, Mayor and City Council, HRA,
Planning Commission
FROM: Jeff O'Neill, Assistant Administrator. I
DATE: April 26, 1993
RE: Meeting Summary/Hospital District Site Planning
The following is a review of the conclusions drawn at a City/hospital district staff meeting
initiated by the City Council and conducted on Thursday, April 22. The purpose of the
meeting was to define and study short -tens and long-term issues relating to future
development of the hospital district property and to identify site factors that will guide plan
development for the area.
Following is a brief review of some of the issues discussed by the group, followed by general
conclusions.
Parking Stall Deficit. The current parking stall deficit of 45 stalls was reviewed.
Barb Schwientek indicated that the problem is magnified by the fact that existing
parking stalls are not all located where they are needed. She also indicated that the
problem is so severe that controlling employee parking would not completely correct
the situation. Finally, the parking problem is intensified during construction projects
because scarce parking spaces are sometimes used for storage of vehicles and
equipment used in construction. Despite the immediacy of the problem, it was
concluded that development of new parking areas could he delayed until after the
completion of the study.
2. Assisted Living Housing nie . Representatives from Guardian Angels of Elk River
were present to describe the HUD program which was utilized to develop nn assisted
living facility in Elk River. Carol Mills reviewed the HUD program and noted that
t ��
Memo
Hospital District Site Planning
April 26, 1993
Page 2
the grant application for HUD funds is relatively difficult to prepare. A successful
grant requires considerable contact with HUD officials during the grant application
process. Housing developed under the HUD program is for low income elderly only.
Most elderly utilizing the program are living on social security only. Maximum
income for couples is $21,500; for single people, $14,000.
The housing project pays taxes: however, taxes paid are at a lesser rate than a market
rate housing development A non-profit sponsor is needed to apply for the grant
application. In this case, the hospital district would be the non-profit sponsor. A
separate non-profit corporation must be established to direct the on-going operation
of the facility.
If an assisted living project is created, the need for parking is relatively low. The City
of Elk River required less than one space for every two housing units that were
created.
It was estimated that the total amount of land area necessary for a 40 -unit housing
project would amount to approximately 2 acres. The site in Elk River consisted of 53
units and was 2.63 acres in size- Carol Mills indicated that the results of the market
study is the most important factor in designing the application. The market study
will dictate which segment of the elderly population has housing needs to be
addressed and will help define where the facility should be located.
3. Storm Sewer Location. The precise location for the storm sewer remains to be
resolved. It appears, however, that the best location will be through the clinic site
rather than through the Soltis/Bondhus property. The need to develop plans and
specifications for the project has been delayed a month due to a delay in the clinic
expansion plans.
It was noted that the location of the storm sewer crossing at Highway 75 could
ultimately become the location of a now entrance point to the hospital district
grounds. This possibility should he incorporated into the design of the storm water
system.
4. Entrance Relocation/Parkine Rpconfieurntion. Relocating the drive entrance from its
present position at Hart Boulevard to a point approximately even with the existing
clinic along with vacating o portion of Hart Boulevard for clinic parking would likely
produce a net increase in parking sufficient to satisfy short-term and long-term
parking space requirements for the hospital district.
Memo
Hospital District Site Planning
April 26, 1993
Page 3
It was determined that OSM should identify the best location and design of the
entrance. The City Planner would be responsible for integrating the entrance design
with site plan/parking redesign alternatives.
A. Short-term Needs
1. Existing Parking Stall Deficit. According to Steve Grittman, if Hart
Boulevard is vacated, a significant amount of land will then become
available for additional parking. Grittman believes that the 45 -stall
deficit could be eliminated by vacating Hart Boulevard and redesigning
the parking area to better serve the needs of the hospital district. This
strategy would enable avoidance of adding additional parking on the
River Street side of the complex.
2. Creation of a new entrance and elimination of the old entrance will
improve public safety. The existing entrance is awkward at best and
would no longer be necessary if a new entrance is developed.
B. Lone -term Needs
1. It was the consensus of the group that at some point in the future, be it
1994 or the year 2000, additional senior housing facilities will be
developed on site. Improving the access to the site via development of
a new, safer entrance and associated improved parking will place the
hospital district in a better position to provide adequate access to future
housing facilities.
5. Location/Direction of future Expansion. No consensus was drawn as to whether or
not the district should expand toward the west or toward the east. Neither
alternative appeared very attractive. Expansion to the west would likely require
acquisition of residential properties on both the River Street and CSAH 75 sides of the
block. It did not appear realistic to expect that only the Broadway side of the block
would be impacted by future development and that ultimately the entire block should
be developed. If this were to occur, then access to Ll-- nursing home from the rear
would not be a problem because there would be no neighborhood left to impact. This
alternative, of course, would be very expensive; therefore, it may make more sense to
push future development toward the east. .
Expansion toward the east would be easier in terms of land acquisition, as fewer
properties are involved; however, the land area that is developable in this direction
is smaller and is located adjacent to the wastewater treatment plant. There was a
concern that development of senior housing at this location might be a mistake due
Memo
Hospital District Site Planning
April 26, 1993
Frage 4
to the potential for odors created at the wastewater treatment plant. Determining
whether to go east or west with future development is an issue that the City Planner
will definitely need to address.
Summary. A considerable amount of ground was covered at the meeting with a number of
issues discussed. The primary conclusion of the group was that a new entrance to the
hospital complex should be developed and that overall site parking problems could be greatly
alleviated through vacation of Hart Boulevard and reconfiguration of the existing pariflng
area. It was also concluded that the City Planner would summarize the site characteristics
and issues and then provide a proposal to the City outlining the cost and program for
addressing the issues, which would include preparation of area development plan
alternatives. It was also concluded that the study should be coordinated with the HRA, and
it was the goal of the group to present the information at a joint meeting sometime in June.
(The joint meeting would include membership from the HRA, Planning Commission,: City
Council, and Hospital District Board.)
If you should have any questions or would like clarification of anything outlined, please give
me a call.
�s.irawcQ
Opp11.0
6M£''
4
Council Agenda - 5/10/93
R. Fevier., of flrot quarter Bauer store n-nancial rcunzt. (!vx.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Enclosed you will find copies of the first quarter financial report for the liquor
store operation with comparisons to the first quarter of 1992. Manager, Joe
Hartman, will be in attendance at the meeting to review the report with the
Council.
Sales for the first quarter were down slightly over last year's first quarter by
$1,927. Although the sales are slightly lower, the gross profit is substantially
higher at $79,535. In reviewing the report, it is very possible that the gross
profit shown at 27.6% of sales may he inaccurate, as this is unusually high for
our operation. Although I have not been able to locate the exact discrepancy,
the excellent showing this quarter could have been a result of an error in our
inventory at the end of last year, which is now showing up this first quarter.
If the inventory was not the problem, we may have missed an accounts
payable.
As you will note, the operating income hits also increased substfmtiFilly heranse
of the larger gross profit and due to the fact the general expenses are slightly
lower than last year's first quarter. Last year we did experience larger (hall
normal equipment maintenance cost for repairing our furnace and also cooler
repairs. The operating income of $31,940 amounts tr) over I Ili of sales, which
is higher than the 1014 we have normally experienced. As I mentioned, I do
feel this l 1f6 operating income figure may he slightly overstated and should
correct itsaelf within the next quarter's report.
It. ALTERNATIVE; AC'NONS
After review of the report with .loe and myself, the Council can accept
the report as presented.
D. SUIII"WHNC DATA:
Copy of Brat quarter financial report comparing 1992 with 1993's results.
MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR
BALANCE SHEET
Current Assets:
Cash
Change Fund
Investments
Accounts Receivable
A/R - NSF Checks
Inventory
Prepaid Insurance
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
Fixed Assets
Land & Parking Lot
Buildings
Furniture & Equipment
less: All—Mated Depreciation
TOTAL FIXED ASSETS
TOTAL ASSETS
Liabilities
Accounts Payable
Due to EDA Fund
Sales Tax Payable
Salaries Payable
Accrued Vacation/Sick Leave
Other Accrued Expenses
TOTAL LIABILITIES
RETAINED EARNINGS
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
99,381.26
1,500.00
249,119.19
83.77
184,817.15
18,369.46
553,270.83
46,591.03
199,285.65
75,993.73
(183,095.36)
------------
138,775.03
------------
692,045.86
¢eeoa_a��ae�
59,746.78
115,000.00
9,078.57
3,191.03
11,561.90
(8,272.36)
------------
190,305.92
501,739.94
------------
692,045.86
ooaaaoaaaaao
MA
MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR
GROSS PROFIT
BY PRODUCT (Q)
COMPARISON FOR
THE QUARTER
ENDING MAR 31, 1992 AND 1993
1992
i993
QTD-TO-DATE
QTD-TO-DATE
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
Liquor Sales
83,520
85,516
Discounts
Cost of Sales
64,365
62,051
GROSS PROFIT -
LIQUOR
19,154
22.9%
23,465
27.4%
Beer Sales
169,227
165,319
Cost of Sales
133,231
127,228
GROSS PROFIT -
BEER
35,996
21.3%
38,091
23.0%
wine Sales
29,615
29,410
Cost of sales
20,153
18,110
GROSS PROFIT -
WINE
9,461
31.9%
11,300
38.4%
,isc Sales
7,630
7,636
Cost of sales
4,511
664
GROSS PROFIT
- MISC TAXABLE 3,118
40.8%
6,972
91.3%
Misc Non-taxable Sales
300
484
Cost of Sales
195
155
GROSS PROFIT
- MISC NON -TAXA 106
35.3%
328
67.8%
TOTAL SALES
290,291
288,364
TOTAL COST OF
SALES
222,455
208,209
TOTAL FREIGHT
COST
1,031
621
TOTAL GROSS PROFIT
66,804
a ocon eocaa
23.0%
79,535
..........
27.6%
MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR
REVENUE AND EXPENSES (Q)
COMPARISON FOR THE QUARTER
ENDING MAR 31, 1992 AND 1993
1992 1993
QTD-TO-DATE QTD-TO-DATE
AMOUNT AMOUNT
SALES
Liquor
83,520
85,516
Beer
169,227
165,319
Wine
29,615
29,410
Other Merchandise
7,630
7,636
Misc Non -Taxable Sales
300
484
Discounts
----------
----------
TOTAL SALES
290,291
288,364
COST OF GOODS SOLD
(223,486)
----------
(208,830)
----------
GROSS PROFIT
66,804 23,0%
IIII-------L
79,535 27.6%
------IIL-II
-ENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE
Personal Services
Salaries
25,038
25,539
PERA
931
925
FICA
1,894
1,925
Insurance
2,761
2,752
Unemployment Benefits
----------
----------
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
30,624 10,6%
31,141 10.81
Supplies
Office Supplies
24
81
General Operating Supplie
2,691
1,495
Other Supplies
682
----------
32
----------
TOTAL SUPPLIES
3,397 1.2%
1,607 ,6%
00
MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR
REVENUE AND EXPENSES (Q)
COMPARISON FOR THE QUARTER
ENDING MAR 31, 1992 AND 1993
1992 1993
QTD-TO-DATE QTD-TO-DATE
AMOUNT AMOUNT
Other Services & Charges
Professional Services
Maintenance Agreements
Communication
298
279
Travel -Conference -Schools
Advertising
593
903
Insurance
4,260
5,031
Utilities, Electric
1,810
2,382
Utilities, Heating
553
697
Utilities, Sewer & water
(92)
Utilities, Refuse
Maintenance, Equipment
2,108
291
Maintenance, Building
967
519
Maintenance, Other
176
Depreciation --Acquired As
4,774
4,642
Other Misc Expenses
35
195
TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CH
15,574
5.4%
14,847
TOTAL GENERAL & ADMIN EXPENS
49,595
17.1%
47,594
TOTAL OPERATING INCOME
17,210
.vvaa a:aa¢a
5.9%
31,940
cave=¢caaa
Other Income (Expense)
Interest Income
10,103
3,935
Cash Long/Short
(169)
106
Sale of Property
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
9,934
3.4%
4,041
NET INCOME (EXPENSE)
27,143
vvaa¢avvaa
9.3%
35,981
c a�vcanvva
Transfers In/Out
ODJUSTED NET INCOME (EXPENSE
27,143
avv¢cavaen
35,981
c avvaavava
■
I
Council Agenda - 5/10/93
Consideration of authorizina preparation of transportation elan. 1.1.0.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
City staff requests that Council consider authorizing preparation of a
transportation study that will help prioritize and schedule future investments
in transportation infrastructure. As you know, the south side of Monticello is
growing at a rapid rate, and it is likely that the pace of development will
continue to increase. The existing road systems serving the growing portions
of the community appear to he adequate to serve short-term needs. In the long
run, however, it is evident that additions to the transportation network as
described in the Chelsea Corridor Study will need to he implemented in order
to properly serve the transportation needs. Planning efforts so far (Chelsea
corridor study) have identified routes but have not been sufficient to identify
the proper schedule for implementation.
The major goal of the study will he to inventory the current use of the existing
transportation system and create a computer model which accurately describes
actual traffic patterns. This information will help identify current and future
problem areas. Once the hase information is prepared, then the study
(computer model) can be used to assess how traffic patterns will be impacted
with the enhancement or development of it particular road system. This
ioGnoaaLiuo iu Luro %iii a3ow us to prioritize road development. For instance,
the study would identify the change in number of vehicle trips across the
H ighway 25/hridge as a result of development. of the Fallon Avenue overpass.
Similarly, the study could also le used to assess the impact on Highway 25
hridgetrafTic resulting from development of a freeway interchange at County
(toad 118. The information will enable the City to select the hest alternative
for relieving Highway 25 bridge congestion. The computer model will become
an important Uml that we cam use to properly stage development of our
roadway infrastructure to serve the emerging needs of the community in it
cost-effective manner.
In addition to providing it tool to help establish priorities for cost-effective
roadway development, the information can be used in conjunction with
communication with MN/DOT relative to needed improvements and potential
funding assistance for City -proposed projects. The transportation plan can also
he used as it basis for securing approval (if' the Federal Highway
Administration on planned improvements that affect hateNtate 94.
The computer base initially developed with this study can be easily updated
by simply updating the changes in land use's and the changes in traffic
volumes its Hwy occur over tine.
Due to the fact that this item was not budgeted for in 1993, it is proposed that
this project he funded through the State Aid Program. Therefore, there would
he no direct cost to the taxpayer fair this study; however, fewer dollars would
he left over for actual physical maintenance of roadways.
Council Agenda - 5/10/93
R. ALTS HNATI V IE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to authorize completion of transportation plan as proposed by
C)JUI sou C'.LY st.,.ft at a co.,L of $4,500.
2. Motion to deny completion of transportation plan as proposed by OSM
and City stuff.
3. Motion to table completion of transporution plan.
C. STAFF RECONIMENDATION:
It is our view that development of a solid understanding of our existing
transportation patterns and the potential impact of various types of roadway
improvements on the existing system is critical to development of a logical,
orderly, and cost-efficient. transportation network. In order to develop our
transportation network in the most cost-efficient, sequence as possible, we need
to know how the development of individual segments will affect the whole
transportation system. It is our view that the plan as proposed will provide
the hale of information we need to make the best decisions for the Cite and
provide information that the Minnesota Department ol"Transpurtation needs
when making decisions relative to City -proposed projects.
The information, which is the hasis of the computer model, is easily upin)ahle;
therefore, the computer model will he useful Lo the City for years to come.
There is limited risk i n gathering the daut and preparing I he i nfornmtion prior
to the time that the City Council helieves (rue traffic congestion problems
exist.
Finally, it's not a mutter of whether or not this study is necessary; it's a matter
of Liming. Should we do it now, or should we do it later. It makes sense to do
it now because there in a chance that the City could qualify on a preliminary
basis for funding through the IS'I'EA Program for construction of an approach
rampat County Road 1111 and/ora crossing at Fallon Avenue. The information
contained in this report will play a critical ode in whether or not we would
ultimately qualify for funding.
1). SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of IransporlaGon plan proposal; Honnld Bray, Project. Manager, Lund
Charles Rickert, Project Engineer, will he in mtendance to provide additional
information regarding the proposal and transportation plan/study methodology;
Copy of Chelsea Corridor Tran sport t.ion/I'irruIation Plan.
City of Monticello Chelsea Area Land Use and Circulation Study
TRANSPORTATION STUDY - TOPIC LOCATION MAP P r o p o s e d T r a n s p o r t a t i o n
mlmtate Freeway®
TRANSPORTATION PROBLEDI OR POSSIBLE ENHANCEMENT LOCATION
City of Monticello Chelsea Area Land Use and Circulation Study
TRANSPORTATION STUDY - TOPIC LOCATION MAP Prop o s e d. T r a n s p o r t a t I o n
Interstate Freeway
Y
•
TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM OR POSSIBLE ENRANCEM ENT LOCATION
Council Agenda - 5/10/93
R. ConAideration of n rNcolntinn ntxiptirra_ lhv aid Str-et
Svstem for the Citv of Monticello. LI.O.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Due to increases in population since 1990, the City is eligihle to designate
additional mileage under the state aid program. City staff proposes that
Council assign the additional mileage to Cedar Street from Oakwood Lane to
School Boulevard Isee map). This particular roadway parallels Highway 25
and serves as a frontage road for Highway 25. Designation of this roadway as
a state aid road will allow us to use state aid funds to construct a proper
alignment. of Cedar Street at the intersection of Cedar Street and County Road
117. In addition, drainage problems at this intersection can he corrected
utilizing stale aid funds.
Other roadways were reviewed for possible placement on the state aid street
system. It is the view of City staffthat Cedar Street is the most appropriate
roadway for such designation.
B. ALTERNMAVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve the resolution updating the Municipal State Aid
Street System for the City of Monticello.
Under this alternative, the resolution will he sent to the State of
Minnesota designating Cedar Street as heing part of the state aid street
system. Funds available through the state aid program could thus he
used for improvements to this particular roadway.
2. Motion to deny adoption of the resolution updating the Municipal Stale
Aid Street System fur the City of Monticello.
'I'his ahernalive should he selected if there is a roadway that is better
suited for state aid designation.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDA'MON:
Staff recommends alternative #1.
1). SUPPOlt'I'ING DATA:
Copy of proposed street addition; Copy of resolution.
City of Monticello Chelsea Area Land Use and Circulation Study
Proposed Transportation
ht$Isle Heew y' m
e
EXISTING STATE All) ROAD SYSTEM
QDam ow sm - PROPOSED ADDITION TO SYSTEM
RESOLUTION 93-
A RESOLUTION UPDATING
MUNICIPAL STATE AID S i BEET SYSTEM
FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO
WHEREAS, as a requisite to qualify for state aid, it is necessary that the City
Council designate certain streets within the city of Monticello to comprise a municipal
state aid street system; and
WHEREAS, the Council has reviewed the recommendations of the City Engineer and
has approved certain streets within the city to become a part of said system.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Monticello
as follows:
1. That Cedar Street from Oakwood Lane (CR 117) to Evergreen Road shall be
included as a part of the City of Monticello State Aid Street System.
2. That the City Administrator/Clerk provide a certified copy of this resolution for
transmittal to the Commissioner of the Department of Transportation.
Adopted by the Monticello City Council this 10th day of May, 1993
Mayor
City Administrator
0
Council Agenda - 5/10/93
9. Consideration of purchasing a versonal cora outer for Office Nlanauer.
(C.S., .f.O.)
A. HEFERENCF AND BACKGROUND
City Council is asked to consider approval of the purchase of a more powerful
personal computer for the Officer Manager, Karen Duty. The main reasons for
this request are: (1) increased use of Office Manager's computer for data
management its well as for word processing, (2) expanded work load and
associated file management demands for the Of ec-rManager, and (3) inability
to utilize existing computer for data management due to limitations of the
computer that Karen is currently using.
Originally in 1987, the city Megan using a word processing package on the
Wang minicomputer. 'Phis program had many litnits to its use and was rather
inefficient. When the city switched to a different computer system in 1990,
word processing was converted from the minicomputer to Wordperfectio on it
personal computer. W(;rdperfectO on a personal computer offered many
features that did not exist with the previous system software: Karen soon
capitalized on to improve efficiency. Tasks that It ad been done manually were
computerized using Lotus@ spreadsheets and huntduxO databases. Some
examples include indexing of minutes, indexing of files, budget manual with
graphics, records retention schedules, and numerous worksheets. In the
process of converting from manual to computer documents, Karen continued
to receive new demands for information management. from department heads
which created additional uses of I.he personal cumpuler programs. The city has
benefitted from utilization of computers in that we hove holler, noire accurate
infiomutlion which can he easily and quickly accessed.
The indexing of council minutes is it good exampl a of how Karen's computer is
being utilized more and more for data mtmul;ement heyond simple word
processing. Previously. the key information from council meetings was hand -
typed on index cards. The organization and t,vpiog of the information unto
Cards was an arduous process that was difficult. to keep updated in it limely
manner. There were limitations on the athilily to cross reference items so Ila, y
could he looked up under different headings. Over the years, topics may not
have always been assigned uniformly or index ectrds may have been misfiled
or lust, which aggravated the task of funding it reference card. With the
computerization of council minule indexes, it ha -4 made the task much easier
from organizing and entering the information into the computer to hooking up
references to the council minutes. Comments fnmii deparl meat heads and staff
have indicated this sys+lem is preferred over the manual one.
Council Agenda - 5/10/93
Another example of greater use of Karel:'-, personal-:)mpU*Xr f:;r data
management is its use for managing planning and zoning; data. In the past,
planning and zoning information was not maintained in it specific place or
order. Some information may have heen filed in administrative files, other
paperwork may have been stored in department head offices, and sometimes
information that should have been kept in files was lost or thrown away. With
the new system that Jeffand Karen started in 1992, every potential and actual
project has it file estahlished once paperwork is generated. The file is then
tracked in a computerized index which is updated and printed at regular
intervals. The index is easily accessihle and provides cross-referenced
headings which makes it easy to find any planning and zoning files as far back
as 1975.
Personal computers have proved to he a very valuable tool for city staff. By
providing this tool, the city has gained many advantages in keeping up-to-date
with all aspects, of government. business in a growing. changing city like
Monticello. Updating computers on an incremental basis as technology
advances allows city staff to continue to respond to the growing information
management needs of the city.
Unfortunately, Karen's computer hits reached its limit in terms of memory and
storage capacit;v. Karen hits received "out of nnennory" errors on a uumher of
(occasions because the computer could not, fond any more space in the available
work area (memory) for the program files. She is currently unahle to add tiny
more to the council minute index and to print either the council or the
planning and zoning indexes. Due to limited storage area on her computer's
hard disk, we could not. load Paradox@O database. Although the hard disk
shortage could he somewhat alleviated by upgrading to MS-DOS 6.0, which
compresses the data to double the storage capacit v, the other limitations would
not be corrected. For instance, the memory management feature of DOS 6.0
works only with it 3S6 or higher processor, not it 296 such as ours.
In 19911, when seleeling the type of personal computers to he used fear word
processing and other staff tusks, the city invested in IBM P.SJ2 personal
computers through the state contract, which allowed its to take advantage of
same substantial savings. At the time, the 111111 I'ti/2 was considered "stale of
the art." with it 286 processor (affects speed and power), 1 megabyte memory
(work area), :10 to lilt megabyte hard drive Istorage capacity), and it DOS -haled
operating system (instructions Ihat tell it computer what. to do).
Since that time, technology has changed to where "state of the art." computer
hardware means much more power and speed (4116 processor), increased
memory (4 to Ili nnegahytes), increased storage 12110+ megabytes), and versatile
Council Agenda - 5/1 O/93
operating systems hosed on UOS and/or NVindows 31. Windows is an operating
environment which allows concurrent use ofseveral programs at one time and
utilizes the available memory much more effectively. Technology has also
carried over to improve the efficiency and capabilities of computer software
packages for such things as wordprocessing, spreadsheets, and databases. The
advantage to this new technology is that, you get more for your money with
this new software, and the prices continue to drop. A disadvantage is thatas
older program versions are updated, computer hardware sometimes becomes
outdated because it is not powerful enough to support the new version.
One solution considered by staff to overcome the limitations of Karen's
personal computer wits to upgrade her existing system by adding additional
memory and disk drive capacity. Thi. option was abandoned because our
research has shown the cost, to upgrade an existing 286 computer to he greater
than purchasing a more powerful personal computer. Several persons have
told us that it is not. worth trying to upgrade an 113M PS/2 that has it 286
processor. IBM brands lend to he costlier and more difficult to upgrade than
compatible brands. Some of the city's PS12's don't have any more room to
insert the parts necessary for upgrading. For these reasons, we budgeted
$3000 in 199:3 for purchasing an additional personal computer. The
configuration of it new system would include at least it 486DX processor. S
megabytes memory. 200+ megabytes hard disk, and other features which allow
us to meet and/or exceed current requirements of our software. In looking at
market trends and referencing some of the trade journals, we were able to
select components for at system that would he within budget, yet meets the
recommendations of those knowledgable in computer hardware and could be
upgraded i n the fut tire.
R. AI:I'ERNA'I'IVE AC'NONS:
Motion to approve the purchase of an upgraded parrsonal computer For
the Office Manager tat it cost not to exceed $,'1000 as budgeted.
With this alternative, City Council agrees with the nerd to update our
computer equipment to stay current and ahle to meet the demands of
the software and requests for information and data processing from
administrative staff. City Council acknowledges that staff has
attempted to rectify the ituation as long as possible with existing
eqa 1pment blit has exhausIM available resources.
Council Agenda - 5/10/93
Motion to deny the purchase of an upd adod pc:sonal computer for the
Office Manager.
Under this alternative, City Council does not agree with the need to
update our computer equipment at this time. With this option,
management would have to review some current operations and devise
new methods to handle those tasks. If it would be necessary to
discontinue computer methods and return to manual methods for those
operations, this could result in increased time and resources for staff to
perform their duties.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
City staff recommends that the City Council select alternative #1 to purchase
an upgraded personal computer for the Office Manager. Currently, we have
received price quotes ranging from about $2600 to $2800. Some of the quotes
are for package prices which include everything that was requested in a
personal computer, and others are for a basic package plus options that bring
the equipment up to the standards requested.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of price quote request; Samples from city council meeting minute index:
Samples from planning and zoning file index.
250 East Broadway
P. O. Box 1147
Monticello, MN
55362.9245 MEMO
Phone: (612) 295.2711
Merro: (612) 333.5739
Fax: (612) 295.4404
TO: Personal Computer Hardware Vendors
FROM: Cathy Shuman, Computer Support Analyst
DATE: April 20, 1993
RE: Price quote for personal computer
The city of Monticello will be considering purchase of a personal computer in the near future.
We would appreciate your assistance by quoting prices for a system consisting of components
selected from the following worksheet. If desired, you may quote a price for a base system
with alternative upgrade options. We anticipate spending between $2000 and $3000 for a
Windows-based system which will be used primarily for wordprocessing (Wordperfect for
Windows 5.2), spreadsheet (Lotus or Excel for Windows), and database (Paradox for
Windows). It is possible that we will use the system for some CAD -based designing in the
future.
If available, we would like to include 3270 terminal emulation that is compatible with
Windows. This would provide connectivity between a PC and a System 36 model 5363. (If
you need more detail on this portion, let me know.)
Please feel free to include warranty or other additional information. You can contact me if
you have any questions. Your quick attention to this is appreciated. Thank you.
COMPUTER PURCHASE PRICE QUOTES \FILES\COMPBUY.WK1: 4/19/93
PROCESSOR
PriceI
Speed
External cache?
Math
Size?
I co -processor?
486SX
$
mhz
I486DX
$
mhz
I486DX2
$
mhz I-
IMEMORY
Price
I8MB
$
I NOTE: eM—debi. tom lees 16MB: eepu
SIMM',
I12MB
$
HARD DISK
Price
l
I80MB IDE S
120MB IDE $
NOTE: 20ma or leu
I160MB IDE $
1200MB IDE $
EO GRAPHICS
Price
Price
Price
Price
rPORT/MONITOR
14e
15e
l6"
17"
00
1800024
$
X 7 s svcn
1
iiA
s
Is
INOTE: non -interlaced: minimum 7011z vertical refresh; 256 wlon minimum; eeuleratd card
I KEYBOARD I
Price
101 key, enhanced Is
FLOPPY DRIVES &
Price
Price
ISTORAGE DEVICES
(Ist)
(2nd)
13.5' 1.44MB drive
$
$
I.120MB internal tape drive
$
I
• 120MB tape controller board
$
(for -wing emernal drive unit)
'prefer lumbo 120 by Colorado Memory Syuems (uses DC2120 mini tape cartridges)
OTHER
Price
I Price
Price
IPS/2 mouse port
$
i for 3
I for 5
Microsoft -compatible mouse
$
Microsoft -compatible trackball
$
12 serial ports
$
12 parallel ports
$
(expansion slots
S
$
SYSTEM SOFTWARE
Price
IMS -DOS 5.0
$
I
IMS -DOS 6.0
IS
(Windows 3.1
S
EMULATION SUPPORT
3270 terminal emulation, windows -compatible (PC to System 36)
(MODEM I Price
12400 baud internal modem IS
1 Price
I$ 1
O
3/76/97
C-61 Mlnut• Ind..
P.p. 1
TOPlC
. ...........
911NIUPIC
............... .....
1AVOLVND PAIR?
........ .------
DESCRIPTION
---------------------------------------------------
DATE 177111
-------- ------
0 ARID
..--------
WAGNER F/U AM[►
...___ ___ ----------
ADULT
VDRA"IM1
CITY
LLTA\L MCM'IVPIUM OI ADULT LOOM 9'A7NSIS ORAL E.O.
7/73/90 14
AOTI4-I
L IM UAE
AM[MC. AP[ [DTAIL.
A.FZSl17N7,
T::ACIUI.I
11 1174!•..11
,I PT 7911 ArtMc71— '^" n"^ 1.'IT'9 1 R IMRII. 9/11/9].
7/71'91 •
9CT!!T P
91 4 RI9�!1T IIR1
A-FP711-
II,IrRAAI
A YINCOII
EIRIA IAO II W! Or I IRR, MNFUAAI AGNERMIIIT rm
0/11/M 11
MY7r[4-P
MUTTINO LAMD.
AIMVPIPT
PMTICIPATIOII
MAI.LILA, JIM
FI—IDS 1/1 /UMDIMO IOP RMOYPI.OYIIIO t PUNCH. SAID
1/01/90 9
Willow
PUIICMAtt I MO
PILOT COIITIOLLID 1NCLIWI.
AI RPOPT
AMMIILF11R0
rin
MLICT Anna '10 69 I IIY[D P.I- M MRn YIR[O
9/76/97 17
DIACUU C
AAMON.
M119A11
f1.IMir
rin
AUTM tATMLiMNItR OF IIID AMMUAI MAINS -IMIC POR
7/79/91 10
MDT14 I
416191.
M 119!1.7
I..IR
CIn
RATAiL. 119 IIID FOR my tt1 RUMMIAO AT LAMOI
7/79/91 10
MO1,14 P
INCL. LICLIINN P4rM.
A.I MAI.
IMIDUND
II[ 7111[11.1.1
101ANMt "ILI 111A11UP IRM 1:.71 LAA W1 n J. IRA
7/77/91 16
IDTI4I
CAI.
'1 -1-1,12-ICII
"FX_
ADJ. 110. COV. IOR CL[MIMO P—MIML COMT710L
7/06/91 6
IpT14I
LewIrl IPATT7 4ALS"IN WL .
AAIIMTIOM
1111T14
MLLI.90. I
ADOPTI4 OF J11 N[MLIn l06 A11tRIM9 IKITION.
9/14/90 9
IOT14 I
M 1• At.t11.UT1t1
ANIINMTt41
IrnIT14
LILLLA[10, 6
JOIMT ACA. YIn TIP ►OA AMMIX M Y L11-1180"1114/91
10
M1f 111 t
1 3 MMLln-
714[ "" PARI.
AAI[MTION
PRTITION
VILLA/RG, A
Y. W11.LL9PO MOILE MITA PARA, MTit]Y. ANCII►T,
11/11/10 14
IVIt4 T
A
61D
""MT. TIPOA
AIITA
ALT:MO MAYOR
RR/Nt'IL
AM1O11.
APA 1R11L[Y 1D[
1/11/\1 IA
MOTIQ t
AP T.
&--,rin
ARM", nPOAM l EAIIOIMA1 MMIII6�MT9
1/16/91 11
HIM' t
A111A
.-,'AI.
cin
APIRt1vr 19.0 Arm I NTMNMTM.
1/0\/10 11
MIYT14 r
AIIT+
AwIP iAI
cin
MIA1Nt 1991 A7M�IAMNT4.
i/t )/11 17
RYT14 P
.r/TA
41111.41.
fin
MIAINt ANMIIAL AI1-10T7RNTR r1 M1 III,
1/11/\! •
NDr14
AQUATIC C[IrT[R
rW1611.IT MT MY
PAP" TTl1t
A— PR[I M VP IMI YAn. PARA IAA. A1TY; [.TML
1/1/q \
IOT74 P/C
1
TASK 111Ct-
7/16/91
Council
Minute In6o
Peg. 1
TOPIC
SYSIOPIC
I■VOLVIO PARTY
DUCRIPTIM
DA19 ITYI
1 ACTIONI
MSS P/V
17191
---------------
AQUATIC CESTIR
-"-----------------
IIOCMT ATMA
-"------.-----.
NoesnT ASROC
------ -.-------------------------------------- '....
CVDCMMD ANCUT AQUATIC CRSRS DN YITINOW EOCIRT
-'------ --
1/17/11 1
----------
DISCUM
-"--- ---
--.._--"'
NOCRT
AWA.
AQUATIC CRSTRP
VATRN PMP STUDY
MIA OORA
PONTPO09 AQUATIC CIeTOI ATUDT; DISCUSS CIVIC
1/74/91 9
NOTION 1
CIVIC CYTT
cmrm $RDS.
ASALS..WRI
AAAI LlU.r-:
PAM "1'Tn1T
IIRDUCI MARS AGAINST ALL t.1UO OVWISO IT PAM CASDIT
4/00/91 17
NOTION -P
11-E
NT $00,379.
ASS99SIQR
AMTOYNT
AAAVI MUM
AAATINW OP C.I. 39 ASNR 9U67 TI RRAITINAINRIN
7/11/90 6
NVTIaI-P
INP PMU
PPU t?,IRG RMOQNM.
ASASSYQST
ANATYYPT
VIST PRAIRIE
TADLED PmnIM ruwm" MSSARCI M VOTED to
4/11/91 4
DISCUSS T
R
MI II7TIP.
AASRISIRIR
ADOPTION
ITS ST
AD,,PTTO MPT ROLL M TftP"!D, IAP PMI 90.01.
11/11/90 1
POTION-►
" 91
ICO PRN
AASRSSPIPY
ADOPTIfM
SPI" OJUITS
ApU►T IIS 9117 ADOPTIPO AAIB PUIL.
9/14/91 4
IOTION-P
91 1
R8N)L�RfUR
ASSRSSIQRT
ADOPTIM
UTLl v's"
RTS. ADOPTIIM AAKT, rInVM MLLA POT TI) INCL - 410
10/09/90 6
POTION -P
90 41
RK.-TIIM
6 MIR 99 " To VAST GUI.
M)SSS WT
ADOPTIOR
PARVIN ILWU0
ADOPT U—LUTIM 90 1 ADOPTING AIKT DOLL AS
1/08/" 5
Knica P
69-1
110 PRO'
IRu►tI{ W .
MAISSIYST
AMMTIMN
MAD—. JNO ADD
RIS. A00►TINO AAKT WLL OT 196.591.401 IST
10/09/90 9
NOTION P
90 41
IID PRN
INSTALL, DU9 1911' PNUJ 90 01.
MARIYVST
ADOPTIDA
SANDSIRO LAST
Al T60 A M pmCw.ID, RM 91 4.
1/11/91 4
NOTION P
90 04
IM PNv
MAISYYST
AOOPTIM
SANDIIRO WT
W. OMSRIPO P10I. A TIRINO AYR AT 691.000 VITO
9/19/90 1
PIR1ON r
90 )•
MNILIRI08
I "OIIYITICMA.
"AR.RNYST
ADOPTIOR
PIDTVAIN
WWT PUS 92 JS ADn►TING ASPIT PULL M PeRSSNT9D.
9/16/91 4
MRION-P
99 W
P/BOLUTIOB
AASRSYQPT
ADU"IOI
N10ITNALN
ADI»YTD MS APCWTING UNITS M PSMIPTUt PROW e0M
11/11/90 1
NOTION -P
91 90
MMURION
1
AMSSSIYII
CONGER
"AND MILLS
PtJ10 TO KWm" UTiL. TO 6CYDL DIST. PUP. TO
4/06/11 11
NDrTON-P
IM PRO,
Mt7N0 MS11 OP rlrrUU PLAN NDAR.
AASSSYYR
C!#f9R
St7fOnL
PW Tt7 SIIT9ND U7I1.. To SCIgDL DIST. PNOP. TO
4/06/91 I1
NOTION ►
IN P%o,
SRCTRS SM IA l» r1ITVM PLAN 11088.
ASSRSYYRT
DICIJNATIIM
ITS ST
SM. WULAIM COSTS ON ASSWRD, SST PUS NAS COR
10/09/90 1
NUTIUP r
W 64
IIS raw
11/11/90! raw 90 2.
3/16/97
Co
11 Minute Ild—
PAge 79
TOPIC
SUETOP I
3NUOLWI PAM
DESCRIPTION
----------
DATE ITM
1 ACTION
----
NISOEII T/U "J",
...............
LICENM
............... ....
ADULT LAW USE
.. ............
CITY
..---------------------------------------
Ilia 91-) ADORING OED AM AN ADULT LAND UEN
........ ......
1/77/97 6
------
NOTION -r
------ .__-...-....-
719 LAND UAE
'I Cr662 N0.
LICENSE
ADULT LAID USE
CITY
RTA/f TO PMPAM RIS EUPPDMIM 010 REQ LIC OF
1/13/02 1
1NDTION-1
A LAUD Vol
ADULT LAUD USCG.
L ICENPT
AMR".AL
"AM ANPnA1 APPA -AI ION Pn1DTriPA1. LirPNSIA.
9/70/91 11
"I's' T
LICENSE
0AIT0I.IMc
AMEEI('M L11DIM
WCIPT SIIMUPT RIMPT 6 ROOM M11 UPP-1 NO
1/77/93 11
NOTION -P
9) 6 AISOLUfIOI
AP PL;CAT I ON -
LICENAf
OMSLI NC
MQPI('M LI01011
MVIIIED APP; 1U AITIOI To DIET; TNI ETOAS, IT IN
6/10/91 17
DISCUSS I
Af PNWED.
LIClost
GAVIAL Nc
DUIRS UNLIMITID
R"FL1 FOR BANQUET ON 6/79/91,
3/11/91 6
M7IION P
I ICENAE
GAIISLI ND
JATrus
ArM PENS APPR` ISO APPL I rAT1ONS NOD A/UNSEAL.
6/11/97 1
NDTTON P
9311 RESOLUTION
1 ICEN11E
G)USI.INC
,Ia.
APPNN9D I1111DMrN O/ oAROLIN0 1.210119.
6/77/91 )
NOTION 1
LICENSE
OWL IND
JO 91 I.AI116
NA17160 DAT nill ASQUINS , WA -2 L11ENM.
0/10/90 1)
DISCUSA■
LIrISE9
aMPl.1Nu
VEN
AEVIIKD ATT, NO AIT1ON Tl Dm; TNMIONn, IT IS
6/10/91 1A
DISCUSS ■
APINNED.
LICENSE
LIQUOR
LIMA.L -V..
A✓ - FINb1/SAU 041 61'191, 0-4 — 1.i . 6 AIDM LIQ
7/17;90 6
NOTICE 1
1.1 Cg6ES.
LICENNE
LIQUOR
LTIOUR SOLDIM
PENN' LICINSIS AN LISTED.
6/04/07 1)
NOTION 1
LICENIE
LIQOM
Lima R1f11I
OILANI ).7 ASIA LICENSE POA TRAM 310 EVIST.
1/09/00 0
NOTION 1
TNAM
Lil EN6E
Lig-0
LIONG CLUB
ms DAl rr",).7 ISBN LIC 1011 dU'M 1SI.10 RAW. A
6/00/01 16
NOTION P
1/ 1 IIVrATEIT.
LIrMIr
I IQUON
LITTT.I N RILL
MWY ).7 Lirpn m LITTLE RVU I- •1111 ANDA.
7/00/9) 1
NITIDN P
L 1IF-I
LIQUM
LITTLI NTN BILL
GIAA T ].7 MRI LICENSE TD LITTTB NEMTAIN
1/79/9) 1
NOTIAP T
NI LI.IAAIDN,
L Iro—I
LIQUM
IGNITICILIO UIQ
A►PO" LIQ t UMMIP T9MAP110 OSTINUIST OR
1/13/97 1%
POTION P
MCA9Sf%IND rNsIp
LIrapes
LIQdM
REQ, I MIMNT6
Ir UTAU "ITITM UU I.RO ARIDA A LIMED l.) BSER
7/77/03 10
BUT: (As 1
LII ENQUIRE
LICENSE
LIgU(*
111LVEN KM
VIOIS TMNSf9S TALNN DRAUHtN TO LTDIA WA a
6/17/01 10
NOTION 1
LICENSE
LIQUOR
MNT'RA14 AUX
AIPOM ).7 DEEP LIC ION PURTICSLIO 00"IRALI. AAOW.
1/00/02 /
NOTION 1
3/16/91
C—"1
M1-1. IMOAM
PASA {A
TOrIc
SUIRMIC
IMTOI.Ym PARR
DIRWRIPTIOM
DAT[ ITEM
________ ______
/ ACTIOII NIIO
P/V PA'V
___
----------
MPTP
____________________
oorroOL MTMW
_______________
DTMIIIC 9T9l1/
___________________________________________________
IMO PIML PIR I= COO MM PAME. A AOlf PDIICR OF
9/11/91 9
__________ ______
mmm-P
---------
PUMLTPAAIMA
PLOY I .
IMI'►
DZMWPIMATIOM
DM
IIIDr1DM CM Kw CONT MMT POR MMD r/AA rm
11/17/97 9
MWIOM-P
DICM41 rACi LITT.
MIf1`
t)DDM�
sUMMY /91A
AIMMILA IA YMfMiAO YITM MMIMIIT rM/AM 1O MM"/
11/11/92 148
DISMIS-■
pl Dmum.
YVTr
PUMCMAAL
CITY
tts SID ►OMOSA rm MMrt A MORTMDL MTwml ATA"
11/19/90 A
MOTIOM r
M PUPCMIIPD
TO MAMMCM DMO CAADIDML.
MTo
PUMCMAA7
CITY
FU CIIMM CCPAVIL CETMP I" DTOMMIC STATIM PO11
11/19/0 1
MWIM P
PUMMAIMO
1TA,A1T.
YMPTr
rUMCMAAA
CIT
POIJMs AUTOMATIC O/T*OL CZMM.
Il/11/90 9
IETIM F
■ PUKMAIMO
MTr
►UMMTITJf
It"
MPLACM OAT rips ATR l
9/11/91 1
WTIOM I
pUMCMMIMD
MTI'
PUPCMMA7
JMRA s ATTIDDD
APPPDV7 nWM W SAAMIMO r011 rIMTA =IT MIT.
1/000/91 1
WTIOM r
ruwc lm
MTP
PUPCIIAAS
OMUILD KIM"
POUILD UPArT TV71 MIOM MCT " ILX MW 111,000.
9/11/1 A
"WIOM P
MTP
/LUD01
110 LAA!
"fil M IP TTIMTIMO AWDOA
1/11/91 11
DISCUSS
AMM MR
PLANNING I ZONING FORMAL APPLICATIONS -- ALL FILES — BY YEAR
QQQE MQ YR APP41 AC NT NAME FILE I DESCRIPTION
AM AT
4
93 Monticello Ind Oars, Inc
93-016 Rel,one to B-2 B-3. 1-1 A -PUD BC Amend Comp and Use Plan
V.V
4
93 Mdra cello -Bq Lane HOW
93-015 Driveway warm 5 ratbatl. Front ""back- nopy (dmrC)
AP
4
93 Martie s rum So—
93-04 Seasonal Miss - teed A Mad
AP
4
93 Kmari
93-013 Seari Mise - garden ranter
V
4
93 Poach. Allan
93-012 Allow detected iumeaa big- (rpm yard setback
CU.V,VAC.AT
3
93 Murphy A ill Soo Bou
93-011 Cumm PuDl'vrdn w0r, negrlV Ease vat. (PUD wze
AT
3
93 Bu1rMM Owners Isocal)
93-010 Amend zoning ad a,gyWonne, regulations
V
3
93 Olson Dor (State 1
93-009 Va alri- to Well a,ee
V
3
93 Carron Richard
93 -DDB Valance to wdr yard --open porch conerunwn
V
3
93 Boyl Jim (Custom CaMpy)
93-007 Variance to I, t ,edu.—nt in pommel expansan a,"
CU
3
93 Montrcelt-Big uke Hosp
93-006 Expand Mont-lo-Brp uke FIuRh Coe Centel by 15 DOD N
V
2
93 MMhcepl AgI
93-005 Lot wbm T,n� Anook—
SS
2
93 Land Prolene Ptnanp
93-004 Dmde mto 2,011 (6-3 zmrng)
AP
2
93 IkVasn Jon
93-003 Home—. . .- „ geM,aled pooucts
AP
2
93 Sprngborg Mary
93-002 Home oecupseon--horrenede baked 9uo06
SUB AM
1
93 Cwntry R.d9e Pm hp
93-001 Oak Pro" kibdnoro'.1 R. PUD to R - I
AT
12
92 Cay
92-049 Regulate MHate dr"—U.—tion dsv,tws
SUB.AM
12
92 Value Plus Hanes
92-046 P,ekm plsVratorH AO IF R- 1 Panel III Cardinal Hats
SUB REP
12
92 "aborg Kam
92-047 Pream prat rod Phs" i The Eyergream
AP
12
92 DePa2 JNn
92-046 HOUNDnccupaton--a—em.c aervrce
AP
11
92 Lenny 6 J,m 1
92-045 Seasonal atlas--CMratmo. liters
AP
11
92 sal, 1 Gorden center
92-044 Sao—*, M4s--CMratmM IrWwr NCIH
AP
11
92 P,rbyl R¢'
92-043 Seasons MH.--C—suM4. t,M MMI
REP
11
92 Mme, Jay
92-042 Pedal of F ureey Count Addition
AP
10
92 Karl. • Cop A Curl
92-041 Hpra Occu0sp. --Decub 611
AP
10
92 Joann s HAK 9"
92-040 Mortes Occupation- treauty ahup
AP
10
92 Puppy Pula. The
92-039 Horns occupatmn--Poor 91 ---ng
AP
10
92 D&hlww JeealeH
92-039 HplM occuppaw,--Iew'eryr<.kxl r%kou retail Galas
V V
f 0
92 Morelp/9l bars HOW
92-037 SW in se1Md Sign .n reser or manmum W h
AT
10
92 Crry
92-036 ARM Counni to an on tart use ru arriondnrent at apaaal mag
12ZPZFILESNPZYEAR 20-Apr_93
ftxr .7ri4't,
L1117 19 22 P1 Lta 10-11, 16-18. Au0 Sube I
1013 Han BIW
100 Du daa Road
300 W /tr St
912 W River SI Bldg N Lot B OP
Lou a-7 S-'3 O,.V Plat
111I001 36 Lot$ 4 A 5 Orrgrra l P41
400 E 3,d St
Lot 6 Blot$ 2 Oakwood Ind Put
1107 Hart BIW
0-1 Lots 3-4 Blot' 7
Pt Lot. 3-6 Bra' 7
1106 Sally La.
425 W 4m St
Fonar Mg Apt 03 Lepx:a Abadnwc 5ervroe
1549 E BrMaway
201 E B,oadesay
110E akwo00 D, (tom Thumb,
106 110 112 Jerry L,etan Or U 1 J W I smelly
112 Hednan La -
104 Mathew Circe (Joann Mpearlar)
109 M.,_ Elwmd Road
I D6 Oak— CetJe lCxrav Mac"
Pt nl &k 29 cote, MMKID110I
PAGE I
PLANNING I ZONING FORMAL APPLICATIONS — ALL FILES — BY NAME
�EMQ
VR APPLICANT NAME
FILE I DESCRIPTION
86
11
90 A Glabus Church
90-039 Adleoent to CSAR 39
Cu
11
90 A Gbnous Church
90-037 Church in an R -I tone
AT,CU
9
89 A Gtalous Church
89-030 Allowing church In Inoustnal zone as A CUP
V
10
88 Abrahamson Jelin
88-038 Front void setback raqurtemeril
V,V,V,V
2
79 Alenon Society Ino
79-006 Septic system Mere.118ok Curpng Assembly room In I-1
V
6
86 Am.. Inn
RA -n71 L igflls qn wnhm fin -I ROW
V
8
63 Amens Inn
83-022 Front void setback
V
7
69 Am can Legion
89-026 Canopy over -fill s (seDack)
V
12
87 Amenun Legion
87-031 Fronf yard setback
sue
7
77 Anoers Wehwim
77-014 SEE SANDBERG JOHN
V
6
87 Anderson Darvon
87-017 Front yard setback
CU
3
86 Anderson David
86-01 t Office budding m PZM tar
V
9
90 Anderson Mark
90-03C Sign harghUarts - Sun -ay Shop
V
5
86 Anderson Russell
85-018 S,deYard setback
V
6
90 Anoer4on Rum
90-020 Sloe yard setback
AM
9
76 Arnold Ban
76-013 Divide bl for purpose of bldg anomer home
CU
10
83 Assendy or God Church
83-028 Day care In R2 tor»
V
4
M AutomsIK Garage Door
86-006 Loading tenth in setbad rsgu.41r11en1
V
9
82 Automat. Garage Dda
62-023 Pylon sign wrmm 30 WW4ck
SS V
9
87 BaMW— Lean
87-020 Crete 2 mo m iK1a duprs use man min la aQtt
SUB
4
70 Ba9loul El.
79-015 Bab—, Estates
SUB
4
78 Ball Estates
78-016 SEE BALBOUL ELIE
V
12
90 Banya, Ants+
90-615 Garage in real yard 60OD"
V
6
92 Barger Brad A leery
92-032 Well kill mon man 60b rnstagtlpsrplass wail hose
SUB
6
92 Barg. Addition
92-023 SEE BARGER BRAD A MARY
SUB
a
92 Barger Mad A Mary
92-023 BARGER ADDITION
REP
12
66 Be" J.ry
85-041 Allow oro bl kid duple.
V
9
60 Bateman Gwen
80-046 Lase than mm ap ft for lamb[.
CU V.SU6
4
92 Bane Rapids
92-009 SEE INVESTORS TOGETHER
SS
7
86 Bao. Don
61-015
Cu
4
66 Belsom Roger
86-013 Alb- bawmenl oars uhawk high wal. rvel n1 Mississippi
V
h
79 Ban— Marry
79-019 Side yard and IMI yard selbed
123%PZFILESIPZNAME 20-Ap-93
Lath 6.7.6, Block 56
Seo 4. T121 R2S (Elsctro Ind)
Lora 4 5,6 7 Block 3
Lab 4.6.6.7 Block 3
101 H41Crest Circle
448 Well Broadway
South Hlgh.ay 25
La 2 Block 2 Balboul Est
Lots 4 A 5 Bloc* 2 RIvie Twists,
Lot 2 Manhattan Lots
AutarrhC Garage Door Me
La 5 Bbd I Cornnielclel %ata 25
31 1 A 313 Mrnresola St
PI Lm 1 A 2 Bbd 13 Lower Mand
MOdI 1 La 1 Bargar, Addition
Pt of Lt I lying SW d I-94 a.c hart dost Be 331-49
Lot 9 A 10 Mod N
La 23 Brod. 2 Rats Manor
604 a 506 Minnesota SI
Lot 7 Block 11 Low. MonticeA�
Peg. 1
PLANNING I ZONING FORMAL APPLICATIONS — ACTIVE FILES -- LOCATED UPSTAIRS -- BY NAME
WPE
MQ
YR APP I 7 AM
FILE • DESCRIP_ 7�
SS
11
90 A Glomus Church
90-039 Adpcent to CSAR 39
Cu
11
90 A Glonous Church
90-037 Chinch ,n an R-1 Ione
A7 CU
9
99 A GlOnous ChurC,
89-030 Allowing church n ndustr.ar Ione As a CUP
V
10
as wahamaon been
88-038 Front Yard wthsck re0unement
V
7
89 Amer.un Leman
89-026 Canopy oval entrance Iwtback)
V
12
87 A", run Legon
87-031 Front yard wtosck
V
8
87 Anderson Dan.el
87-017 Front yard wttacl.
V
9
90 AnOoaon Mark
90-030 S.pn hesgovsele - Suowar Strop
V
6
90 And.bn Ruth
90-020 SWe yard wtoacA
V
a
98 Auto—hc Garage Door
89-006 Lckm*%00nh In aetWck redunenMnl
SS V
9
87 BaclstOrn L1.dla
87-020 Cfwt. 2 —o n1 hoe Muss!• leas than n o nl AR b
V
12
90 Deny& Arno,
90-045 Garag..n rear yard wtbsm
V
6
92 Gage, Bw 6 Mary
92-032 WO Ino rrgrA Bun Well, TeuUft.1gls. wall brush
SUB
6
92 Barge, Adalwn
92-023 SEE BARGER BRAD i MARY
SUB
6
92 Barge, &AOA Mer,
92-023 BARGER ADDITION
CU V SUB
a
92 Banks Rap10a
92-009 SEE INVESTORS TOGETHER
SS
7
88 Be,- Don
W-015
V
6
be, banson K."
b -U24 C e Pg.. rel..08 yard wmedk (7"I
V
3
93 Rayl J+rl ICuseom Canopy)
93-007 Vlenance It curt .q.usnynl In post" eapenA arw
AP
2
93 Bogan Jon
93-003 Home ocrupSIg--comwiw generated products
V
6
89 Borldnua Corp
99-023 Sud yard aaUeoL .rat to RR bra
V
A
90 Boman John
90-008 Garage .doer seas yard aamSOlr
AM
9
97 Boyle JIM
17-021 R.Ione B.VM propny
SUB
11
87 Brannan Tom
97-029 Sketch plan
SUB
8
91 Bru. Oekee [oat.
91-016 SEE PRESTIGE BUILDERS
V
9
88 anr5ge WAiei telephone
89-026 Parking lot vla"n 8 graak area
V
7
87 9rnknan Way-
87-012 Pym a.go ee9ack
vUr
13
90 9enal Man
Two Garage A~ seas o wasmok
AT
93 9uarnsak Owrw• (bun
93-010 Amer o j x ng old rpVDanrw ragwwm
AT CU
6
99 Busch More
99-027 A loonng oeo A breakfast An PZM tone as CUPhen
V
7
N Busch More
w- 017 Deached ga.Age .0- hon" yaro ea0aa
SUB AM
12
92 Carrsnal Hes place m
92-049 SE E VALLE PLUS HOMES
123%PZFILESLPZACTIVE 20-Ap-93
LEQk I ADDRESS
Lou 67 8 Block S6
101 Hlllcreat Cum
Sarum H.gtlweV 25
Lou a 6 5 Blocs 2 RIM, brace
Automatic Gar ago Door she
311 6 313 Munnesota St
Pt Lot 16 2 Bron 13 LIYear Mont
Block 1 Lm 1 Barg., Addnron
P1 0 1 Irng SW 011-94 In' tract peat EA 331 -492
SOA A 506 M.nMima St
sots 2 6 9 91tick 56
Lot 6 Bkrd. 2 GMwckU01010 Park
11a Sandy urw
Bond uS Ane
335 P.m.e Road
Las 10.1 16-2022 Audra A Suod
&.age Wet.. AWA
Auto pAnA ti-WNAlrorlal Sualllrlg
I m 2 &nck 3 BADouE•
Rand hgrY
PAGE i
PLANNING I ZONING FORMAL APPLICATIONS — 1975-1996 — bnteo m h6evm.nt
SrQ"
MQ Vii APPLICANT NAME
FILE I DESCRIPTION
v v v v
2
79 Alanon Socnrty Inc
79-006 Sep11c system Hard surface. Curbmg. Awrtroly room in I -I
v
6
93 Amenc Inn
93-022 Front veto setback
v
6
86 Amenc Inn
86-021 LrghtWvgn within street ROW
SUB
7
77 Ander Wdhefm
^-014 SEE SANDBERG JOHN
Cu
3
96 Anderson Ds d
86-011 CXflce buddnp rn PZM zone
v
5
65 A11001 n Rumel'
.4-1`111N Sfdaysrd seWack
AM
9
76 Arnold Ben
76-013 Dfylde al for Durpose of brag ancrowr nomu
CU
10
63 Assetnbl) or Goa Chu,ch
93-026 Derr care m R2 zone
v
9
62 Automatic Garage Door Co
92-023 Pylon app within 30 setwa
SUB
4
76 Balboul Elm
78-015 Be l Estates
SUB
4
78 Balooul Estates
76-015 SEE BALBOUL. ELIE
REP
12
85 Barthel Jerry
86-041 AN.. zero 1.1 line dupe.
v
9
90 Bat.mar, G.-
110-046 Lees than min ab it fa rernbW
Cu
4
65 B.lsaak Rkpu
96-013 Allow basement coop under high *ate, lays) of Mrauaupp.
V
5
79 Benson Her,y
79-019 Sias yard and,", Ya,o setback.
CU
4
8o Bergarad Jonn
90-019 ...
AM
3
76 Bergelao Joh,, B
76-002 R-2 to R -B 60 -UNI elderly hag cOmpe.--Cehr Crest Ace.
V v
4
84 Bev -m Wt" Printing
64-015 Sko"'d dr -.al, 0—as
V
6
79 Beat .n- Wwon Printing
79-022 Curring ot—ki cert long lot
CU
4
90 Beat -m- W aOb Printing
90-011 Allow Waring dock ,n Mak .,it of -in. al in r- I lode
V
2
77 Brogan Chu Ma
77-002 Modh home to R-1
v
7
78 Bink. Ronan J,
78-022 Allow garage 3 from wasterN p,openy Mie
v
5
81 &nche, Del
91-017 Erect oll-prermse sign of 200 ao It or thol
V
7
92 Bkx;hw Ouldoo, Ao"n
92-014 Replace 2 wood advert Mr. with ateel ergha
v
a
93 Bloch., Outdoes Aayen
93-019 Abwed ,wk c hon of ran-contotm,rp al
CLI
10
76 Elf—gen Dan
76-015 4-1Nel ace
AM C L,
2
82 &fn,Tua John
92-001 Rezohe feMdence - R- 1 to R-9 Develop corporate offices
V
B
91 &.1.d- Cnpaation
8, -026 Allow, bldg w4Mn 5 of hint p,OpMTy lire
v
6
8, B,k mu. too, company
81-020 Allow bldg within I-1 zone uwp 22 aefoack
SUB AM
6
9: &lyr. James
82-021 Maedow Oak A -O 10 R-1 R-3 A R-5
V
6
IN &rMman Way-
96-024 Frpm and rear yard wmacks
SUB
6
80 Brother. The
90-026 SEE LANNERS OUINTIN
1?31P7FI1ESIPZBSMT 23 -Mu -93
R
S-4 T121. R25 1Elecno Ind)
Lou 4.5 6 7 Block 3
Lot& 4.5.6 7 BItx.k 3
448 West Broadway
Lot. Block 2 Babouw En
I 01 2 Monfwhan Lots
Lot 5 Block 1 Cflmnw W Plaza 25
Lot 9 A 10 BInCk N
Lot 23 M -.k 2 Art" Mono,
L.1 7 Balk 11 Lrwre, MMIltxlln
7th 6 Lowest
Lots 1-3 9-10 81" G
Lot 3 81001, 1 Oek.00d Ind Pan
Lot 3 Block I Oakwood Ino Pan
N 112 LI3 t4. 10.."1.0 Park
Section 32 R25W
Lot 3 91" E Riggs Addition
LI 12 6f1, 2 Launng Hillside Terrace
Thoma. Ind Pan Gang 1-94
Lots 6 9 10 Block 23. Uppe, Mohr
1349 NM soulaysrd
Sw— 12. 7171N R25W
Sedan 12 7121N R25W
Pt Sac 15 Pt Sec 15 T121 R25W
Nation Bushing
PAGE I
City Council Agenda . 5/10/93
10. Consideration oftiodate••An improvement toeasthoundl CSAR 75. I.I.S. t
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
At the last meeting, City Council briefly discussed the possibi 1 ity of the County
Road 75 project being delayed beyond Labor Day. The council instructed staff
to see if the city could upfront the cost of the federal portion of the highway
project due to delay in federal funding. I spoke with Wayne H ingalson, Wright
County Highway Engineer,and Dave Montebello, Assistant H ighway Engineer
about that possibility. They indicated that the notice to proceed from the
Federal Highway Administration conics concurrent with the funding and that
any money spent prior to that time are dollars that cannot be recovered.
In a recent meeting with the Minnesota Office of State Aid, the county learned
that the project had also heen reduced one notch in priority. Although the
county is contesting the loss in priority for this project, they may or may not
he successful. It is my understanding that the loss in priririty may have a
negligrihle effect over the completion of the project this year. However, if the
project were delayed until next year, funding may be in jeopardy. Apparently
the county projeets the earliest start for the project would he the second week
of August. Under this scenario, the project would be completed one week after
Labor Day. If the project is not completed this year because of a request by
the city council or lack of funding from the federal government, and dues not
have a federal funding priority for 1994, the County Assistant Highway
Engineer indicated that they would hook at alternate ways tA-) fund the project
for next year and present that information to the County Itoard and City
Council.
It. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
The first ulternaLive would he to continue supporting the county's
attempt to have the project completed this year with federal highway
funding. This would mean the oarliest. completion (lute would he the
week after Labor Day.
Y. The second alternative would he to ask the cnunly to delay the project
until next year and lake our chances with the federal highway funding
priority system in 1994.
City Council Agenda - 5/10/93
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the City Council
continue with attempts to have the county complete the project this year.
Wright County's traffic control plan provides for a minimal disruption and
inconvenience during the project. There are no guarantees for 1994 that the
construction period would occur during a period of time with less disruption
and inconvenience to the public.
Is+ Q...4er kepo4
F,le Depl.
3AN. - MARC -VA - 31 1993
~ yy (a lls , 7a3-rA1-6.
L-, Resctie -- /s
F're Al rm 8
Vek; c.le - - (;
S4r�c4�r�-> y
Grass —• I
Power I:. a
�ufnpskto —+
Coni'bl Bvfn� I
fl✓eAne O♦ a-daoce /5f ,ve ).
IAel-deb :S no+vo-1 AA 6:aen -- Clearwc,{er
SUU-10
,.I.P/e 1.9e-
3 f.s: ,;,,,S sessions Bey✓:.:.,g /078 or Ass.
Aye, oAe,\da,ce --o al rieil
a Responder• ra:,,:�� regkr:n� ay f�r��l.
Ave. mWendancc G .Men
/ 4Jof9 n,ghf -- 9 Are,, - IR .,A, -.f.
I Spec:o,l pkys;ca.l Ag I: ly TeskAc, (Qr:ll n:gtiF)
/a meA - aN Dates.
AcL,;l;ee_ Far 0,,.,ler
l.) gnnoo.l CIO: Feed w:14. elo..s clo,
a.) ro..r r,eslaF:an "It, Cob sccv4-s
3.) E",Iy c6:ldkood f,-;Iy UjcJ:o., osy a L:NIe 1%f ,,A..A
sek.l.
D
i
'} 6reukdo�n o4 C Ns for JAPJ. — mA�ecH -31kt l993
/ioAkccllo C - 1v : st, ur-�J re-
veh: c-1 e — 3
�
Gruss - I
�t.SCue /0
/%nice//o T.,nsA:r: S+rw�4vie - I
G to s O
robs -
11 "
S Ivey
creek Twp : 5;+e•c�vrt. - O
veh:ale O
G rc,-ss O
Rescue --. I
Oar I
'
At
�
Ve6�cla—+ 1
Grass � O
Res -we- 3
re bl -
y•
/
A7,.f,,wl Ard rcce;ved
D�
Mutes I Arca
3 \
To Fal n�.,..,6Gi o� Co1/lam
- Ny
lu v%4-
1'4/Is
PERMIT
NUMBERDESCRIPTION93-2004
FEES
House 8 parade
193-2005
House r"chn9
193-2006
House A 2a, age
193-2007
Pare shalt.,
193-2008
111$.11., 'amoaa
I93-2009
mtm,or 8 e.1ao''eao0el
193-2010
Deck
I93-2011
HDuM Aparade
193-2012
Park sheller/wa,min9 louse
193-2013
House ,.aia,n9
193-2014
Bwlamp retool
193-2015
Roof cove,ep apnn onov
$53,30000
House 8 parade
i:3-2016
3-2017
HMM a on go
193-2018
House 8 parade
193-2019
House 8 go,ape'order
IB3-2020
Dock A mto,o, amour
1{83-2021
Ihh— ,orrlooel
IB3-2022
3 -eerier. paWnmanea owl
+93-2023
3-snmm, pato ramll0ol
193-2024
Dock
193-2028
Rool-covae0000n each
193-2026
HW50 8 cargo
193-2027
Detach
tia eaeuo,v ""C37193-2028
I
Interim A o.f.. —hoci1
1A0
PLAN REVIEW
193-2004
House A parade
i:3-2006
House 8 pe,aD4
3-2011
Hare. 1,
IB3-2012
Park 6holLr/wArminamUaa
193-2016
Hous. A 111::11193-2017
52500
House A po,eDo
1B3-2019
M.U.O a parade
193-2026
I
Hou- B pa, Ade
CITY OF MONTICELLO INDIVIDUAL PERMIT ACTNT' REPORT
Aeon of April, 1993
FEES
I
TVPEI
NAMFJLOCATION
VALUATION
PERMIT
SURCHARGE
PLUMBING ISURCHARGEI
SF
VAlua Plus Homes/9371 CanvaAoack Can
$72.30000
$48336
93615
924.00
$050
Eupene Kuhnrl 06 Wasrwpton Sl
'2.00000
S2000
51 DOSF
iAC
Value Plus Homo$/5260 Staring Dr.
$53,30000
638641
.665
$2300
$050G
W„ght Counly/2101 Wag County Ratio 75
$1,500.00
51500
50.50
Claranco A Nancy McCarty/1061/2 East Broadway
$10.000 DO
$11700
6500
$34.00
$050
iAD
+Renato 8 Lou 1531o"IW670 Rrrerne.r O,
630.000 00
$269 DO
$1500
1A0
Cuftora A Ruth CanolV1335 W River SI, Lot 57
61.500.00
S 15 DO
50.50
TSF
IVlt Hallman Ca SlfucnaVBWI G,IIar. Are NE
$62,40000
$50437
i..
52500
SC sC
IG
ICnv of Momrce110I107 W Rival St
$55.40000
643890
$27.70
$3000
S050
IAD
IDen,el 6 MKhollo wh1161204 Wight St
$2,00000
$2000
6100
I
IAC
IJonn GoSWV212 Wen B,oaawav
$1,50000
51500
6050
I
JAI
Eleclo InouatrreW2150 w R,Mr St
63,00C 00
53000
61 6D
SF
Value PIu5 HOMOWS156 Mallard Lona
$53.300 00
$38641
$2665
$23.00
$050
SF
Gerald Doer, A Char WiaamMN9851 Gmerd Aro NE
$87.50000
654292
$4375
629 DO
$050
SF
VHue Put;Homow9D60 Horan Court
$58,1 DO 00
$40585
$2905
$2300+
$050
AD
A=ll A BelIV K,AUMAWISOO R,vornew Dr
$1.50000
S15DO
S050
AD
Cvmhia I—of1104 Crocus Lane
$4,30000
56570
5215
AC
Monl4mlo AgoncWi 39 Sendorkp Rosa
624,00000
S24300
61200
AD
Jon 6 Pahae BopeN 1108 S" Lane
$14,600 00
$ 1 5840
$730
AD
JohnI Donna G,onau11505IN R,va Sl
$4,50000
51600
$050
AD
Dco 2 0 111013 0 9 KI.lIOM➢ E T,Aeer Por.
61.500 OD
51600
S050
AD
Fr4nGa 8 Joyce Duoah614 MMoaoto St
(1.500 DO
51500
5050
SF
Valu. Plue H0m.V5 l a l star". or
$53.3000063941
62665
$2300
5060
RG
Alen A Jnann,u Marro linch/9t2 W Riva, St
i8 400 OD
610260
5420
AC
Dan 01aon1207W 3rd $I
$25,80000
$23720
61290
J TOTALS
6650.20000
$4.90243
932335
62U DO
$450
SF
value Plus HomotJ937t Commack Can
$4O 34
SF
Value Plua Hom.N626A Sterlx,A Dr
638 $4
SF
iV,c Holman ConroucIvV9621 Gillett] An, NE
$5043
G
City of Mondcollal107 W Rho, St
6285 22
SF
V"n Ptue HomoW6156 MaUld Lane
$3864
1
SF
Garcia Dom, A Char wol,ameon. B851 G r4,a A. NE
65.149
SF
Valeo PtuS HomaWO000 Hoon Court
640 59
SF
Voluo Plue Hemoe/51II Stmkop D,
63864
TOTAL PLAN REVIEW
$59099
I
IOTALREVENUE
$6,05527
1
(0IY (N MON IIr.EI l(1M(111II/L v nUll i 1N(l: IN rANIM( NI fK /HINT
Moron a Ap 1993
11`V,UTSa USI.S
as Tn,s
NMItk ISSUED
Mwth MARCH
Mantra APRIL
kANI IAL
T. Dr.
Ta Dam.
Numn4r
16
Is
Vay,a:lno
{311,)3000
9679.00000
+M
tt 07.1 75
54 097 70
9urc nu9al
/18910
{78375
COMMERCIAL
5a
NUmbr
9377.700 00
1
Valuanan
/{,50000
bt,30000
f w
915 00
K37 711
Su,cnar9Y
90 SO
/30.0
INDUSTRIAL
9170000
Num0a+
$13800
V.I..—
93,000 00
w
900 00
9„rcnY9r
91 50
R WRING
(klmb
5
9
Iw
/11900
971100
$urcnH9ae
67 50
64 50
0I NE As
N.—
7
VHua1ro�
956,900 00
+
/119 07
9urc Map..
/79 70
lo/AL 4pF lq
»
L
lOTAL VM UATKAII
{71970000
946070000
TOTAL fEFS
93 1%6 is
96.,•77.7
IOIAI 51NK:11A(K1ES
919110
/77795
V'�*NI 46(111111
{SAI l NA 111TH Nun10H
1.-." I
I>,N
MuN1 I .muy
Cum r. I
IMw1 i� H a
Rao Oa,a9.a ' 910790
4V•,4
I',A11e NnW 91.180!
.1 I I IIA 111 NVAN 1 •AN,
Itialli�.p. ) /117 N1
1 �v.�nv� is • /6V w
«.1..H�uI 1 910 m
111AA9NK1
A6 1IOr 9 9746 00
Ht.l A9(Wr
A I INN11N" N
R�Nnmup Mw114
(y 4. 1 999 10
11 M\IW1Nv P/ qN 1
lk MOI II N31.
S—Yunln
I"VMI
in.sy",
laK Y461
T. Dr.
Ta Dam.
40
43
$18230000
9970.100 00
91,160.600 00
9115771
91171'18
t9—Al
9b 40
9.58 05
Ssn 55
1
5a
$200000
9377.700 00
$72.30000
970 00
/7 .6. 16
9763 7'0
SIM
816065
SA b
7
9170000
$13800
6600
716 0
$5200 /79. 00 4650 m
/100 b00 b00
7 7
woo 9C 00 966.9m 00
/1000 17046 911907
Soso 91 00 /79 7(1
71 6,1 11
910430000 91[474000 61,301,90000
61 S M 17 910.001 55 S'"'2609
990 90 9075 70 ISM 10 y
rq I,
VHuHnn VW Y9r
SW711(100 19 13
0 0
0 0
O 1
0 0
9Aro N.m00 7
0 0
6A 7U 950 900 00 7 0
9T 90 $11 100 00 73 77
970 4o "I IM 00 9 4
91 w 93 099 09 7 0
M 90 9 19
1199
IYrma Sun n��
93 301 50 Gb 10
101019 Y 9t 77AV
0 0
N15 9770000 / 4
0 0
0 1
Sul M 99b.ID0 00 79 43