City Council Agenda Packet 05-24-1993AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Monday, May 24,199.4 - 7 p.m.
Mayor: Ken Maus
Council Members: Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst., Brad Fyle, Patty Olsen
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held May 10, 1991, and the special
meeting held May 18, 1991.
3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints.
4. Update by City Assessor on local I14oard of Review adjustments.
5. Consideration of authorizing City Planner to prepare a long-terni plan for
hospital district area.
6. Review of schematic design and preliminary construction cost estimates for
phase II of the Monticello Publir Warks Ravilily.
7. Consideration of authorizing a faci lilies purvey and evaluation Coir all public
build ingsfor determiningcompliance withthe Americans with I)isahiIiIies Act
(ADA).
8. Consideration of bids and awnrd of annual sealcoating project.
9. Consideration of replacing two waste activated sludge pumps ut. the
wastewater treatment plant.
10. Consideration of hills fur the month of May.
11. Adjourn.
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, May 18, 1993 - 4 p.m.
Members Present: Shirley Anderson, Brad Fyle, Clint Herbst, Patty Olsen
Members Absent: Ken Maus
Consideration of conveving a aortion of School Boulevard to Value Plus Homes
Inc., of Monticello for olattine ourooses.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill explained that Value Plus Homes, Inc., of
Monticello requests that the City convey to Value Plus Homes the portion of
School Boulevard identified in the Cardinal Hills phase III plat as School
Boulevard. This transfer of land is necessary in order for the plat to be
recorded by the County. The developer must be able to show that all of the
land in the plat is owned by the developer; and, unfortunately, a portion of the
plat included a portion of School Boulevard which is owned by the City.
Clint Herbst indicated that he has no problem with conveying the land to the
developers because it is being used for street purposes now. After being
included in the plat, it will continue to be used for street purposes.
Aller discussion, a motion was made by Patty Olsen and seconded by Brad
Fyle to convey that portion of City -owned land identified in phase 111, Cardinal
Hills plat, to Value Plus Homes, Inc., of Monticello contingent on the
developers paying all costs associated with conveying the subject property to
the developer. Motion carried unanimously, with Ken Maus absent.
There being no further discussion, the meeting was adjourned.
Jeff O'Neill
Assistant Administrator
.1
Cou ncil Agenda - 5%24/93
a. Update by City Aqqessor on Local Board of Review ni�ustmenta. (R.W.1
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Since the Board of Review meeting on April 22, the City Assessors, Jerry and
Peggy Kramber, have been working with the County Assessor, Doug Gruber,
in re-evaluating the parcels that were heard at the Board of Review meeting.
The review has been completed, and Jerry or Peg Kramber will he in
attendance at the meeting to briefly update the Council on what action was
taken in regard to reducing market values on the parcels in question.
Enclosed with the agenda you will find copies of letters that have been mailed
to the property owners who appeared before the Board of Review or provided
written comments at the Board of Review. In many cases, changes were made
which reduced their estimated market values after further evaluation. 1
believe the City Council, acting as the local Board of Iteview, should affirm the
action taken by the City Assessor.
13. AI:rERNATIVF. ACTION~:
1. After reviewing the adjustments that were made by the City Assessor,
the Council, acting as the local hoard of Review, should accept the
changes or recommendations of the Assessor.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the review of the County Assessor, Doug Gruber, and City Assessor,
.terry Kramlwr, the Council should approve any changes noted. This
acknowledgement of any changes still allows the properly owner tai continue
any appeals through the County Board process and/or state tax court system
if they desire.
D. SUIII'()lt'I'ING DATA:
Copy of letters to property owners heard at the Iloard of Review.
'�-xU
�( 5 P
JNTY O,p
DOUGLAS M. GRUBER
0� %
Wright County Assessor
%
�.
Z
Wright County Government Center
10 N. W. 2nd Street
In
Ruffnln, Minventa 66313.1193
is
Phone: (612) 682.7367 / (612) 682-7368
y
Metro: (612) 339.6861
(612) 682-6178
78r=6
May 13, 1993
May
Leo E. Zempel
725 West R I ver St .
Monticello, MN 55362
Ret PID #155-010-059010
Dear Mr. Zempelt
Your letter was read at the Monticello City Board of Review. The
Increase in estimated market value on your property Is similar to
Increases In value In your neighborhood. No change was made to
your 1993 assessment.
If you would like the City Assessor, Jerry Kramber to review your
property, you may contact him at 675-3748 to set up an appointment.
S ncerely,
Douglas M. Gruber
Wright County Assessor
cc. Rick Wolfsteller, Monticello City Administrator
DMG/ga
Equal Opportunity / AJ/irtnatim Arnow EMJ)MWr J/
JNTY 0,�.
DOUGLAS M. GRUBER
O� .
Wright County Assessor
/.
Z
Wright County Gouernment Center
10 N. W. 2nd Stmt
tom
•d
Buffalo, Minnesota W13.1193
iR
V�
Phone: (612) 682-7367 / (612)662.7368
Y
Metro. (612)339-6881
7866
FAX: (612) 682-6176
May 13, 1 993
Lawrence L. Clausen
320 West Broadway
P.O. Box 145
Monticello, MN 55362
Rei PID •155-010-037100 8 #155-010-048081
Gear Mr. Clausen,
Your letter was read at the City board of review. After careful
conslderatlon, the local board reduced the estimated market value
on Parcel 0155-010-037100 from 842.800 to 041,000.
Parcel 0155-010-046081 was also reviewed and the estimated market
value was left at 050,400.
S ncerely,
Douglas M. Gruber
Wright County Assessor
coy Rick Wolfsteller, Monticello City Adminlstrator
OMG/ga
Equal Opportunity / Afr~tiur Arbon Ewjpkyer
JNTY O,r�
DOUGLAS M. GRUBER
Wright County Assessor
�.
Z
Wright County Gouernment Center
10 N.W. 2nd street
M
Buffalo, Minnesota W313-1193
i�
Y
Phone: (612) 682.7367 / (612) 682.7368
Metro: (612) 3398881
7866
FAX (612) 6828178
May 13, 1993
Dan R. Carlson
525 West River St.
P.O. Box 80
Monticello, MN 55382
Ren PID 0155-010-057010
Dear Mr. Carlson,
After reviewing your property, the City Assessor recommended
reducing the 1993 estimated market value from $88,000 to $84,000.
Incerely,
Douglas M. Gruber
Wright County Assessor
cc, Rick Wotfsteller, Monticello City Administrator
DMG/ga
Equal Opportunity / A/firmtiue Action E"Udoyer . /
Peter R. Bou I ey
2780 Meadow Lane
Mont I ce 1 lo, MN 85362
Rei PID 0158-059-003050
Deer Mr. Bou l ey e
DOUGLAS M. GRUBER
Wright County Assessor
Wright County Government Center
10 N. W. 2nd Stmt
Buffalo, Minnesota 6b313-1193
Phone: (612) 682.7367 / (612) 6827368
Metro: (612) 3394881
FAX: (612) 6824178
May 13, 1993
After viewing your property, the C t ty Assessor recommended reduci ng
your 1993 estimated market value from 082,600 to 079,100.
Douglas M. Gruber
Wright County Assessor
cc, Rick 19olfeteller, Monticello City Administrator
DM9/ga
F,gMj Opportwity / A(fi~iw Art" 6wpbyee
III
JNTY 0,t,
DOUGLAS M. GRUBER
V0 1�
Wright County As8essor
�'
�.
Z
Wright County Government Center
10 N. W. 2nd Street
M
Bu//ab. Minnesota 66313.1183
'�,
Phone: (612) 6827367 / (612) 682.7368
Q
Metro: (612) 339-66881
78Bs
FAX (612) 682-6178
May 13, 1993
Duane J. Bert IIson
301 Weshln0ton St.
Monticello, MN 58362
Ree PID 0185-018-032060
Deer Mr. Bert IIson ,
After reviewing your property, the City Assessors recommended
reducing the 1993 estimated market value from $135,600 to •117,900.
Incerely,
Douglas M. Gruber
Wright County Assessor
cc, Rick Wolfsteller, Monticello City Administrator
DMG/ga
Equal Oppart"ty / Affimmtim Actium Employer ��
JNT V Qp
DOUGLAS M. GRUBER
v0 3�
Wright County Assessor
%.
�.
Wright County Government Center
10 N. W. 2nd Street
Buffalo, Minnesota 55313.1193
62
iio wM
Phone: (612) 682-7367 / (612) 682.7368
Q
d
Metro: (612) 339-6881
7666
FAX (612) 682-6178
May 13, 1993
Edward A. Schaffer
531 West Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362
Re, PID •155-010-048040
Dear Mr. Schaffer,
The estimated market value was reduced on your mother's property
from $43,900 to $37,400 for the 1933 assessment.
As mentioned at the board of review, If your mother Is In a nursing
home and the property Is not rented, you may be eligible to keep
the property as homestead. We have olassifled the property as
homestead for the 1993 assessment. If you can provide proof as to
when your mother entered the nursing home and make an application
for an abatement, we may be able to adjust the taxes payable In
1993.
If you have any further questions, feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,✓
Douglas M. Gruber
Wright County Asoesoor
cc, Rick WolfotelOar, Monticello City Administrator
DMG/ga
Equal Opportunity / A/(vnwnw Anion Emplayn /
`r
Michael M. Talbott
1312 West River St.
Monticello, MN 55382
Ret PID 0185-023-001050
Dear Mr. Talbott,
The City of Monticello considered your request at the City Board
of Review. After reviewing your property, the 1993 estimated
market value was reduced from $97,300 to $93,800.
Sincerely.
%'Y' -�k .VV�
Douglas M. Gruber
Wright County Assessor
ccs Rick Wolfateller, Monticello City Administrator
Encl.
DMG/ga
60sa/ Opportso�tY / A//irntatior Action 8srylaY41
4 �
DOUGLAS M. GRUBER
JN-cY o,,�
Wright County Assessor
vp,
•Z
Center
Wright County GotxrnmcnL
Z
rip
10 N. W. 2nd Strcct
Bufiato, Minnesota 56313.2193
m
4
Phone: (612) 682-7367 33 (822)682.1368
Metro: (6121339.6881
-4:r
FAX: f6121682-6178
7e sO
May 13, 1993
Michael M. Talbott
1312 West River St.
Monticello, MN 55382
Ret PID 0185-023-001050
Dear Mr. Talbott,
The City of Monticello considered your request at the City Board
of Review. After reviewing your property, the 1993 estimated
market value was reduced from $97,300 to $93,800.
Sincerely.
%'Y' -�k .VV�
Douglas M. Gruber
Wright County Assessor
ccs Rick Wolfateller, Monticello City Administrator
Encl.
DMG/ga
60sa/ Opportso�tY / A//irntatior Action 8srylaY41
4 �
4'r V C,,1
DOUGLAS M. GRUBER
0
cot Rick Wolfateller,
Monticello City Administrator
Wright County Assessor
/.
Z
Wright County Government Center
10 N. W. 2nd Street
fa m
Buffalo. Minnesota 66313.1193
�d
Phone., (612) 682-7367 / (612) 682.7368
y
Metro: (612) 3396881
7866
FAX. -(612)6926178
May 13, 1993
Dann G. Forsberg
1322 West R I ver St .
Monticello, MN 55382
Ret PID 1155-023-001021
Dear Mr. Forsberg,
Your letter was presented to the City of Monticello board of
review. In examining your estimated market value, it was
discovered that no allowance was made for the value of your lot
when compared to neighboring properties. Your 1993 estimated
market value was reduced from 191,400 to 188,300.
Incerely,
Douglas V. Gruber
Wright County Assessor
cot Rick Wolfateller,
Monticello City Administrator
CMG/ga
Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Entployn
Council Agenda - 6/24/9:3
Consideration of authorizini; City Planner to prepare a long-term Dian
for hospital district area. G1.0.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
On April 12, 1991, the City Council approved a conditional use permit. which
allowed expansion of the existing clinic building. As if condition of the
conditional use permit approval, the hospital district was requested to work
jointly with the City to design it lung -term plan that serves the needs of the
hospital district while heing sensitive to nearby residential neighhorhoud
concerns. At the meeting, I'larh Schwientek indicated that the hospital district
is very interested in working with the City toward development of a long-term
plan for the hospital site and that she would work with City staff toward
development of it unified plan. According to the meeting minutes, it was the
consensus of Council to authorize City staff and Consulting 1 tanner to work
with the hospital district toward creating it development plan for the area.
Subsequent to the Council meeting of April 12. 1991, (lily staff, along with the
Consulting 1'lauuaer, mel. with Barb Schwientek for Life purpose of identifying
issues and for identifviog goals of a possihle study. The sununary of this
meeting was provided to you with the previous meeting's agenda packet in
conjunction with the recent driveway and canopy entrance variance request.
After reviewing the mutter with the City Planner, it. became evident that, to du
it thorough study of the issues involved would require it significant investment
of time by City slaffand the Cily Planner ($1.100). City staff isamcerned that
the direction provided al the meeting of April 12 did not take into
con side ral,i(lit the clWlti assecalted with Ill` in-depth study that will he required
to answer Life many questions relating to lung -term development of the site.
Theref6re, Cily staff requests that Cily Council again review the direction
provided to stuff at Life meeting on the 12th and determine if Council is
comfortable with spending $:3,1011 to prepare it lung -term plan fear the site.
AtUached you will find an outline prepared by the Pity Planner which
delineates the scope of the planning study. It is the opinion of t:ity staff Thal
the scope of the study as outlined will answer questions to the satisfaction of
the City.
H. ALTERNATIVE, ACTMNS:
I. Motion to allocate $1, IN fur the purpose of completing hospital area
concept plan Iter the oulline provided by Northwest Associated
Consultants.
Council Agenda - 5/24/93
Under this alternative. City Council is comfortable with the concept of
utilizing City funds to develop long-term planning goals for the area.
City staff would coordinate the work of the City Planner and hospital
district to accomplish Oho goads outlined in the Planner's outline. It
would he our goal to have a report, prepared for presentation to a joint
meeting of the hospital district. HRA, and City Council on .lune 17,
1993, at 5 P.M.
Under this alternative, the City will have good information on which to
base decisions relating to vacation of Hart Imulevard, and decisions
relating to future conditional use permit. requests.
Motion to allocate one-half of the funds necessary to complete the study
contingent on the hospital district. 1>,oying the other half.
This alternative recognizes that. Iwthsides henefit. from the study and,
I therefore, the cost should he shared.
a
ternatives #1 or il'l should result. in lower long-term planning
3� e4� y1ti ocnwOs IATIMs(' the study will lim)ne a framework for exlediting
t° lad ear future planning and decision maki ng.
3. Motion to deny allocating 5:1,1011 for the purpose of complct.ing hu.pilul
arca concept plan per the outline provided by Northwest Associated
Consultants.
City Council could take the position Thal it. is not the respunsihility of
the (.:ity to prepare the planning Study as proposed and that it is
incumbent upon the hospital district to du its own site planning for
subsequent review by the laity Planner.
One could argue that this approach may result in a higher cast to the
taxpayer. The total cost fur plunning assistance will likely he higher
under this alternative because without gond direction Iwovided to the
hospital district., there will le more plan revisions needed with each
particular request submitted in O-kvfuture.
(:. S'I'Ahh' RWONIMEN13ATMN:
Slafl'reconunends sharing the coast Initenuttive 02). It is our view that in
terms of cost efTiciency, it makes sense tc► work coolerat.ively with the hospital
district toward development. of langderna pians fur the area. Such coo1wra lion
Council Agenda - 5/24/93
will result in lower ulannintt exuenses for both, ensure urolection of area
neighborhoods, and result in a site plan that works in terms of parking and
traffic flow, etc.
There is some question, however, as to whether or not the City should be
paying the full cost to have the Consulting Planner prepare plans for the area.
Perhaps the City Council feels it is in the hest interest of the City to work
cooperatively: however, the City should not necessarily he paying the full cost
of the Consultant's time and energy on the project.
Although the situations differ somewhat, you may recall that the City
conducted the Chelsea Corridor Study in part in response to the development
of the Little Mountain Elementary School along the southern tier of the
Chelsea corridor industrial area. This study was financed entirely by the City;
however, this study also addressed more general community land use and
transportation issues and identified needed changes to the zoning map in the
areas far removed from the school district. In the case of the hospital district,
the study area is much smaller and more focused on issues created with the
expansion of the hospital district itself. It, appears Ihat there is more direct
henefit to the hospital district, from the prolwased sl.udy than there was direct
benefit to the school district from the Chelsea Corridor Study.
I). SUPPI)ItTING DATA:
Council meeting minutes of 4/12/93, item #19: Work program, City of
Monticello hospital area concept, plan as submitted by the City Planner.
Council Minutes - 4/12/93
19. Consideration of a conditional use Derrnit which would allow the expansion of
an existine clinic building in a P7M (performance znne mixedlzone. ADDficant,
Monticello -Big Lake Communitv Hospital District.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that the Monticello -Big Lake
Community Hospital District purchased the clinic building I ocated directly east
of the existing hospital. In conjunction with the purchase, the hospital district
is proposing to nearly double the size of the existing facility. The clinic
addition will mirror the existing building in appearance. In order to expand
the clinic as proposed in a PZM zone, the hospital district must first obtain a
conditional use permit.
O'Neill went on to review the site plan in terms of its design and impact on the
area. He reported that the number of parking stalls proposed with the clinic
expansion meets the needs of the demand created by the clinic expansion;
however,the site as a whole, including the nursing home and hospital, remains
45 stalls short of the minimum number of perking stalls required.
Ken Maus noted that the clinic expansion and the potential for congregate
senior housing in the area will result in increased traffic and parking demand
in the area. In addition, use of River Street for vehicle and truck access to the
nursing home parking and loading dock areas creates conn icts with residential
uses along River Street. Maus emphasized die need to develop a long-term
plan that would improve the traffic flow, parking, and general site
organization.
Brad Fyle concurred. He noted that an attempt should be made to provide
direct access from Hart Boulevard to the nursing home without using River
Street.
After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle, seconded by Clint Herbst,
and unanimously carried to approve the conditional use permit allowing
expansion of the clinic facility in a P7A zone subject to the following
conditions:
I. Staff review and approval of detailed landscaping plans.
2. Staff review and approval of design and construction of screening
fence.
1. Staff roview and approval of grading and drainage plan.
4. Hospital district providing easements neceemry to construct
storm water facility.
6. Hospital district consideration of workingjoindy with the City to
design a long-term plan that serves Ute needs of the hospital
district while being sensitive to nemby residential neighborhood
concems.
Barb Schwientek indicated that the hospital district is very interested in
working with die City toward development ora lona-term plan for development
of Ute rito and that she would work with City staff toward development of a
unified plan. It was the consensus of Council to authorize City staff and
Consulting Planner to work with the hospital district toward creating a
development plan for the area, r
93 T "U 1 0 : 30 0 P . 0 1
jj[—NA C
Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc.
R e A N PLANNING• DESIGN • MAR K C T R R 8! A R C H'
TRANSMWAL RECORD
.........o.....o....n............................................
DATE: ZO M kO%40'%3
TO: .J erf- C*4
FROM: !—;t� 69+#--*1P4J-
VIA: () Mall () Pick Up () Delivery • .Fax
NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 3
' D
QTY OF DATED DESCRIPTION
REMARKS:
O�fl�+►�� op W a- -
tPR��P�n t3JD�r
`�t- 'ML t-lo4 P l twV /� Car�C f
RE: ? a;
JOB NO:
M.-. 1'- 2c2- 93 T MII I e, :3 1 0 P. k.N 2
WORK PROGRAM
CITY OF MONTICELLO, MWNESOTA
HOSPITAL AREA CONCEPT PLAN
I. Data Assembly
A. Information assembly necessary for map preparation and
reference.
B. Base map preparation.
C. On-site survey of facilities as necessary to complete
design and mapping.
Projected House: 13 Budgets $ 439.00
Principal: 1 hr 0 $55 55.00
Support Staff: 12 hre 40 $32 384.00
II. Needs Assessment/Analysis of Issues
A. Identify and summarize on-site issues.
B. Identify and summarize facilities/use issues.
C. Identify physical site/expansion needs.
D. Meet with City and hospital staff an necessary to clarify
needs/goals.
Projected Houses 12 Budgets $ 430.00
Principal: 2 hre A $55 110.00
Support Staff: 10 hre a $32 320.00
III. Concept Plan
A. Prepare one or more generalized area plane showing
proposed facility locations, drop-off/parking, vehicular/
pedestrian circulation, and future expansion areae.
B. evaluate and review concepts with City and hospital am f
on factors including economic viability, functional
performance, and aesthetic considerations.
C. Select concept plan to be ultimately developed.
Projected Hoarse 29 budged $1,020.00
Principal) 4 hre a $55 220.00
Support Staff: 25 hre a $32 800.00
M A V- 2 0- 9 3 T N U 1 0: 3 1 0 V es
zl. !•aster Fit-Vultimate Development plan
A. Refine concept plan based on evaluation analysis.
B. Develop detailed master site plan layout.
C. Prepare presentation drawinge of final plan in color or
as desired.
D. Final presentation of plan to City.
Projected Hours: 22 Budgets $ 042.00
Principal: 6 hre a $55 330.00
Support Staff: 16 hrs a $32 512.00
SUB -TOTAL $2,731.00
Expense• (materials, travel time, postage,
reproductions, etc.) $ 400.00
TOTAL PROJECT COST $3,131.00
2
e
Council Agenda - 5/24/93
6. Review of cChernalic deaien find nrelirninar•v i'gnclrtvctinn cant
estimates for chase II of the Monticello Public Works Facility.. I.I.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
OSM has completed the report and cost estiuultes for phase II of the public
works facility as previously authorized by City Council. Phase 11 was hroken
into three sections for cost analysis and suh-phasing capabilities. Phase II -A
consists of a sand/salt enclosure on the north side of the existing vehicle
storage building. The cost analysis was haled upon a combination ofconcrete
and wood construction.
Phase II -13 consists of an interconnection hetween the old shop and new vehicle
storage building. The footings and fioundation walls were completed for this
phase with the vehicle storage building itself. This connection would house a
wash/Imint hay, a storage ro on, and a storage room for drain oil, lubricating
oil, and flammable products. Phase 11-11 also includes it new roof on the
existing maintenance shop and an addition of small skylights, along with some
minor interior modifications.
Phase II -C consists of an addition In the south side of the existing shop
huilding. Thi. addit ion would have a lower roof line and house a brealu roam,
restrain facilities, and a meeting/training room, as well as handicapped
accessible parking and entrance, all in compliance with ADA.
The estimated construction costs and architectural/engineering fees tore as
follows:
Phase I I -A, sand/salt, enclosure
$108,000
Phase 11-11, wash/paint IMV &
1111kinteollnce building upgrade
$110,000
Phase I I -t;, soulll building addition
to include handlcaplocd aceesslhle
entry, restrooms, break room.
nieet.ing/(raining ruunt
$126,01111
Construction contingency, IIP,i
$ :irijmo
TOTAL EST. CONSTRUCTION COST:
$379,0011
Tt ITAI. A & h: FEES BASED ON
A SINGLE PROJECT:
$ :14,100
T( )TAI. PHASK 11 COST:
$41:1,100
Council Agenda - 5/24/93
The above-estimalcd cLs!s tare to be used for phar.ning purpt�scs ,�Oy Th,,
actual design and bids will determine the costs. Although phase II could he
completed in three separate sections, there are cost savings by having the
three phases completed at once. The savings would not only he in the actual
construction cost but also in the architectural and eng6neering fees. 'There are
also surae hidden cost savings, as the construction spread over three periods
would also involve additional stafftime and inconvenience to the public works
departalent.
Since we currently have one-third or less of the money needed earmarked this
year, it may Iw hest to postpone the actual construction until 1994. This would
give us the summer and fall to develop plans and specifications for it winter
hid and an early spring 1994 start. This would also give us time to verify our
financial plan. Kick has developed sonic alternatives For financing of phase 11.
They are included on at separate sheet. in Lhe supporting data.
Staff would prefer that the engineer/architect he allowed to start design plans
and specifications its soon its possible. We would like to have Lhc lime and
oplNlrtunity fur Lhe building conullitloc to view similar construction with other
public works departments and have ample uplwrlunily to incorlorale the lest
dollar value into the design of phase I I as we did in phase I. Also. if we ore
to continue with this phase and other phases to final completion, we need to
continue our conditional use permit, which will expire after one year. Il is the
stales intention to take this item before the Planning Commission at their next
meeting with Council authorization.
AI.'1'ERNA'TIVE ACTIONS:
The firs( alternative is to accept. the schematic design and preliminary
cyst. cot imale retort fur phase 11 of 1 he public works facility, to apply for
extension of the conditional use twrmih and to authori•re the City
Engineer Lu prepare plans and specifications lin• Secliuns A, li, and C of
phrase II working in coulx,rat,ion with the building committee. The
design would include it cost analysis after Lhe preliminary design work
is dune so that we may adhere to it financial plan its selected by the City
Council with as goal of it winter hitt and spring 1994 start of
con sIruclion.
2. The second alternative would Ix to accept the report and to authorize
plans land specifacal.i(Ills for the salt/sand enclosure 1phase II -A unlyr,
slung with the extension of the conditional use permit,. This would
involve an 11'.1 fee fur A A E.
Council Agenda - 5/24/93
3. The third alternative would be to accept the report nnrt P! ails
and spe6fications for phase 11-A and 11-13. This would he the sand/salt
enclosure and the vehicle wash hay and maintenance building
modifications. This would probably result in in A/E fee closer to 1 I`,l
rather than the W/e.
4. The fourth alternative is to do nothing at this time. This docs not
appear to he in our best interest, ati continued open storage of sand/salt
mixtures can lead to potential ground water problems, the problems
associated with high moisture in buildings during winter washing
periods will continue, we may need to do repairs to the roof on the
existing maintenance building only to he changed or modified at a later
dale, and we would he no closer to meeting our ADA requirements.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director and Street
Superintendent that we continue toward completion of the public works
facility, realizing that phase III, which includes the offices and water
department in the old NSI' building, cony IK, many years down the road. A
sectnm of that phase, namely the ADA accessible bathrooms, break room, and
meeting/training room, has been added to phase 11, which should satisfy for the
time tieing the Americans with Disabilities Act. All three sections of phase 11
tore important to the efficiency of public works activities in Monticello, and
phases 11-A and II -11 represent sound environmental investments as well its
worker safety consideration. Since the entire building committee hits not
reviewed the final documents as presented here, their recommendation will he
reserved for Monday evening's meeting.
1). SUIII'()I('I'IN(; DATA:
Copy of the final report from 1)SM along with the plan sheet.; Financial
planning proposals from [(ick Wolfsteller, City Administrator.
OW&On
sCxlen 300 Park Place Cenier 611-595-5775
Mt�1caVyeet����A 5775%VaMLa aOU(evard 1.600-753-5775
AeSo[tatrt,trv- Minneapolis, AIN M416-1228 PAX 595.5773
PROJECT' REPORT
Dates May 24, 1993
Ret Monticello Public Works Vehicle Maintenance Facilities Expansion
Monticello Project No. 93-W
DSM Project No. 5088.00
Purposet Schematic Design Review and Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate for
Phase 2A, 2B, and 2C Modifications
Uniform Building Code (UBC) Review for Schematic Design: Assess UBC
issues regarding existing, Vehicle Maintenance Garage and proposed
modifications.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Review for Schematic Design: Assess
ADA issues regarding exisjting Vehicle Maintenance Complex and proposed
modifications.
i
i
1. Schematic Design and PreliroinarylConstruction Cost Estimates
A) Project Overview and Sehed4:
• The project is prese:J as phases 2A. 2B, and 2C which comprise the
addition of a salt/s enclosure (phase 2A), vehicle wash bay and
maintenance build�ng modifications (phase 2B), and
training/meeting/restroom addition (phase 2C) as outlined in the following
section. Please reference the schematic design plan attached at the end of
this report.
• The entire addition is broken down into the sub -phases in recognition of
fiscal limits. However, 4 the City should choose to complete the project at
one time, it Is reasonable to expect certain economices of scale which,
although difficult to qu , should minimize the expease of the proposed
construction. These sa would result primarily from lower contractor
mobilization costs and er A/1s fees (see Part D). Additionally, the
completion of the entire Project brings the facility into compliance with the
American with Disabilities Act (via accessible facilities provided In Phase
2C), the Minnesota State Energy Code (via insulation, higher efficiency
mechanical equipment and lighting provided In phases 2B and 2C), and
MnDOT recommendations for prevention of salt brine contamination) in
Pbase 2A).
Pad4t1braid tax trammlttal memo 7M If of icor. p �A
[np�wn • uAar w p� ���_ � -
�
Monticello Project Report
OSM Project No. 5088.00
Page 2 of 6
In improve the possibility of constructing all of phase 2 at one time. the
following schedule is noted:
Project design and contract documents completed and out for bids late
winter/early spring 1994.
Construction to start as soon as possible thereafter.
B) Construction Phases and Estimated Costs:
Note: Construction costs shown are derived vin square foot methods based on:
Contactor interviews, square foot costs for similar project types, and
Meant Buiidirig Construction Cost Dar; 1993' (ln&ady construction
cost reference rrranual). Site work expenses (pavi% landscaping, building
demolbions) are not included
Phase 1; Provide salt/sand enclosure on north side of esdsting Vehicle
Storage Building. Enclosure to Include skylights, match height and relate
materially to the adjacent Vehicle Storage Building. Provide 18' wide
overhead door.
Preliminary Constrvetlon Cost Estimate for Phase 2A:
2600 square feet Q 541.00/Square Foot w.$108,00111.00
Phase Z$: Provide Vehicle Wash/Paint Bay and 011 Storage Room between
existing Vehicle Maintenance and Vehicle Storage Buildings. New structure
to include skylights and match the height of the adjacent Vehicle
Maintenance Building. nis phase also includes remodeling of existing
Vehicle Maintenance Garage. Work on this existing structure to include re-
roofing, the addition of skylights and update existing mechanical system and
lighting. A building sprinkler system will be provided as per code.
Replacement of existing meaanine stair is Included.
Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate fbr Phase 28:
New Construction and remodeling • lump stun a 5110,000.00
Equipment cost for portable vehicle hoist not included
Phase: Office addition to the south of existing Vehicle Maintenance
Building. Please refer to Schematic Design Plans for spaces provided.
Work to include handicap accessible parking, entrance, and restrooms to
bring the facility into compliance with ADA 'Ibis phase to include
providing exterior Lmulation system to Phases 2B and 2C
IFMImInary Constrvellon Cost Estimate fbr Phase 20
Monticello Project Report
OSM Project No. 5088.00
Page 3 of 6
1800 Square Feet @$70.00/Square Foot = $126,000.00
C) Estimated Construction Cost Summary:
Phase 2A - Salt/Sand Enclosure $108,000.00
Phase 2B - Wasb/Pains Bay and
Maintenance Building Upgrade $110,000.00
Phase 2C - Office Addition $126,000.00
10010 Construction Contingency S35,000,
Total Estimated Constmetlon Cost $379,000.00
D) Estimated Architectural/Engineering Fee
Phase 1 Architectural/Engineedng fees amounted to approximately 9%
of the construction cost for this large, tree -standing building enclosing
primarily open space. Since Phase 2 is divided into smaller portions
involving remodelings, connectors to existing structures, and more
involved interior space planning, the percentage of construction cost
for fees is slightly higher. 9% - 11% is the preliminary fee estimate for
this work.
Since typically the larger the project the lower the percentage of cost
used as fee basis, if the City should elect to complete all of Phase 2
proposed construction, A/E fees should be minimized. Total A/E
Fees may be estimate at $34,100.00 (99b) to $41,700.00.00 G1%) for
a this $379,000.00 proj#ct.
Please note the r/tit uwle for A/E flet is premised on utilitarian of
building program 1pfo on developed by TKDA, dated Feb. 17, 1991
and schematic plans eveloped by OSM. Fatenrlve verification or
variance from these programmatic guidehnet would rcsvlt in additional
work and potentially Ge a revision of fee parentage.
A) Existing Vehicle Maintenance strufture consists of concrete block exterior bearing
walls with exposed metal bar josso supporting the root. Interior clear to the
bottom of the joists is approximately 16'-9". Exterior concrete block walls are 8"
CMU and should satisfy as a 4-bour fire rated wall. There is a mezzanine
constructed of wood across the west end of the Interior of the building. This
Vehicle Maintenance building is approximately 3500 square feet.
B) Building occupancy Is classified as -4 (Chapter 9, 1988 and 1991 UBC) defined
as repair garages utilizing open flame, welding, etc. This claulffcation shall
Monticello Project Repon
OSM Project No. 5088.00
Page : of 5
encompass the new Vehicle Wash Bay and OR Storage Room in addition to the
existing Vehicle Maintenance Garage.
Note: This occupauy classtfuation is contingent upon determination of quantity
of Clats 1, 11, and 111-A Gquidr stored In the buUdIA8.
Q Because the existing structure exceeds 3000 square feet, a building sprinkler
system is required (Section 3802(02 1988 and 1991 UBC for the entire area of
the occupancy.
D) Type of construction may be classified as either-
Type
ither
Type M -N: Combustible construction, no requirements for fixe -resistance,
7500 Square Feet allowable.
Type V -N: Combustible construction, no requirements for fire -resistance,
5100 Square Feet allowable.
Note.! In either care, the wood mersanine may remain
The addition of building sprinkler allows the above noted floor area limits to be
tripled. (Type M -N increases to 22,500 Square Foot, Type V -N increases to
15,300 Square Foot • Section 506(c) 1988 and 1991 UBC).
We recommend classifying the building as Type M -N to allow a maximum square
footage of 22.500 to accommodate noted expansions (Phases 2B, 2C, and future
office/equipment storage space • approximately 16,500 potential square footage).
This Type 113-N classification wih allow these future additions to be separated by
"occupa.nty separation walls", and not the more cumbersome and costly 'area
separation walls". In all cases, the existing Vehicle Storage Building must remain
classified as a separate area and utilize the erirting south wall of this structure as
an area separation wall.
E) Welding may be done anywhere within the buflding except as required by fire
code:
No welding may be done in or near rooms where combustible liquids,
vapors, or materials are located.
Non-combustible shields shall be used when welding Is done within 1(' of
co=buadble materials or pedestrian tmfi3c areas.
F) In regards to memanfne guard rails, it should be verified that they be such that
a sphere 12" in diameter cannot pass through. (Section 1712 (e.) Exception i 1
1991 ITEC and Section 1711-1998 UBC)
0 5. 2 1. 9 3 0 2: 3 2 P M - O S M ASSOC P 0 3
Monticello Project Report
C+SM Project No. 3088.00
Page 5 of 6
3. Amedcaos Mth Disabilities Act (ADA)
A) The ADA is relatively new legislation designed to protect the Civil Rights of the
disabled. This civil rights legislation applies to the situation of the Monticello
Vehicle Maintenance Complex as follows:
1. The City must insure that all programs offered to the public are in locations
that are completely accessible to the disabled. If not previously performed,
the City should survey its facilities, identify all barriers to accessibility, and
prioritize their removal. We understand the buildings in the Vehicle
Maintenance Complex to be "employee only" areas as opposed to spaces
offering programs required to be accessible to the public. Thus, barriers
found in this complex may be considered a relatively low priority.
2. We have reviewed the following with the MnnesoL State Council for the
Hnndicanoed and have determined it to be a reasonable approach for
addressing ADA requirements at the Vehicle Maintenance Facility:
a) A large portion of buildings on the site are for storage or vehicle
maintenance functions only. In light of the potential connection of
such buildings with office spaces, all new areas of the complex shall be
designed and constructed so that individuals with disabilities can
approach, enter, and at the areas. This will affect Phases 2A, 2B and
2C of proposed construction.
b) Phase 2C shall provide an accessible entrance to the complex,
accessible parking, and accessible restrooms in accordance with ADA.
c) Given the mezranlnes in the existing structures are storage or
maintenance personnel area+, and because of their relatively small size,
the mezzanines are not required to be accessible.
d) The most pressing area of concern is the accessibility and restroom
facilities within the existing offices of the Water Department Building.
In light of the accessible spaces to be provided in Phase 2C, it is not
reasonable to proceed with a modification to this building unlett
required by the potential employment of an individual with disabilities
prior to the completion of Phase 2C.
OS. 2 1. B 3 02 : 32PM wO 014 J%&GQC PO2
Monticello Project Revort
OSM Project No. 5088.00
Page 6 of 6
e) We would recommend a plan be developed to convert tbis -cstroom
into an accessible facility, and to Illustrate minor mne.Alcadom
required to snake building entry accessible. It is critical to note that
such plans do not shield against lawsuits and the City should be
prepared to act quickly In regards to the upgrade should the need
arise. Disabilities may not eliminate or postpone date of hire beyond
reason.
If you should have any questions regarding the issues addressed herein, please feel free to
contact our offices. Thenk you for your time.
Sincerely,
ORRSCHELEN-MAYERON
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
Douglas D. Wild, AIA William J. Zerfas, P.B.
Project Architect Project Manager
C. BAW/OFV/RCK/File
M\AM9tA"W\RMRTDDw
PKAN 2A
LJ
w.ial SomIr
i
LJ J w. ,...-r.
ri r�
»nr_l/rr L LJ LJ
J L.
L —
I ruler � rr it
•. - . '.yc,.� ti"r"es `�
O.wr or Dow
cz%tc'�r» / SCHEAATI DESIGN 'Al' VEHICLE STORAGE FACILITY
DO1r YAr f) SON 00 ••••• • » ••
., _ PHASE 2
.-- L—.:. ---- MONTICELLO, MN.
S.--
I I
POSSIBLE FUNDING SOURCES FOR
PHASE II OF MAINTENANCE BUILDING EXPANSION
• 1993 budget included $100,000 tentatively earmarked for future interceptor
sewer expansion. Discussion by Council at budget review session last year
noted that these funds could be reallocated for other uses.
• City now receives annually approximately $40,000 from state highway funds
for maintenance. Approximately one-half of these funds are available from the
1992 and 1993 allotment 140,000).
• As of April 30, 1993, the liquor fund had - $350,000
Less: Funds earmarked for revolving loan fund - (115,000)
Less: Funds needed to complete phase I of
maintenance building project (25.000)
Current liquor funds available - $210,000
• Liquor fund should produce earnings (surplus) of approximately $125,000 in
1994 that could be used for phase Il.
• A specific dollar amount could he included as part of next year's tax levy (1994
budget).
FUNDSRC.PW: 6/21/93
Council Agenda - U24/93
Consideration of authorizing a facilities survev and evaluation for all
public huildintts for determining compliance with the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA). (R.W.)
A. REFERENCE ANI) BACKGROUND
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 extended civil rights protection to
the disabled by prohibiting discrimination in employment, public services, and
public accommodations. City governments are primarily affected by two
sections of the Disabilities Act, which pertain to employment. requirements
(Title 1), and Title 2, which emphasizes the elimination of discrimination
barriers in regard to services, programs, or activities provided by the public
entity.
The effective date of the Disabilities Act varies depending on which arca is
heing discussed, but the employment regulations, which receive more attention,
had an effective date of July 26, 1991. In regard to program accessibility, the
effective date was January 1992: and as it result, the City should develop it
written policy and evaluation study to ensure compliance with the regulations.
Program accessibility requires all public entities to make reasonable
modifications to policies, practices, and procedures to pronate an integrated
setting allowing for use of facilities and programs by disabled persons. In
many cases, local governments can achieve program accessibility through
structural modifications of existing facilities dnecessary or by simply providing
alternative sites or auxiliary aids. A public entity's first obligation is to
conduct, an evaluation of its favilit.ies to determine the existence of or the need
for accessibility (cal ures. Such an evaluation will identify programs, activities,
and services that the City provides and review and determine whether any
physical barriers are limiting access to the programs and facilities by the
handicapped.
~ince an evaluation of all of our facilities needs to he conducted to determine
whether there are any harriers for the handicapped, many communities ore
utilizing outside assistance familiar with the I)isahilities Act in relulionship
to architectural requirements. %L•. Doug Wild of Uti111, who is working with
the public works department on the architectural design of the maintenance
building expansion, will he doing it brief survey of the Cily'n facilities fur the
purpose of developing it proposal to cvahiate whether our facilities and
programs are in compliance with the AM Act. A cost estimate for this study
will he available Monday evening.
Council Agenda - 5/24/9:5
B. AIJERNATIVP ACTIONS
I. After discussing the proposed study with. Mr. Doug Wild and/or Bret
Weiss of OSM, the Council could authorize OSM to prepare a facilities
survey and evaluation ofour programs for compliance with the ADA Act.
2. Council could seek additional proposals from other outside consultants
who specialize in providing ADA services.
3. Council could instruct the City staff to perform its own self evaluation
of the programs and facilities to determine whether the City is in
compliance.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
While the effective date of the Title 2 section of the ADA Act was .lanuary 26,
1992, the City hits not had any problems that we are aware of concerning
providing accessihilily to handicapped persons to either our buildings or any
programs or services we offer. While we have not encountered tiny problems
to date. this is not to sav we shouldn't have a study performed and
documenuition that the City is attempting to comply with all the regulations
of the ADA Act. The hest way to accomplish this is Lo have a written
evaluation of all our facilities for compliance with tiny physical harriers
removed and also an evaluation of all the services and programs we provide to
ensure that the handicapped do have access to these programs and services.
Should we ever he challenged in Lite future, it written evaluation will he to our
benefit. It is recommended that if the proposal from OSM appears reasonable
in cost, the City should authorize the evaluation study he completed. If the
proposal fee seems excessive, stafTcould seek alternative proposals from other
consuluints in this area.
1). tiUl'1'0IL'I'INf DATA:
Letter from OSM concerning consulting services.
OTT
Sdidw
OAMS)&=IM
700 Par, Place Center
5775 Wayzata BmL and
Mmncj=. MN 5541n-12_28
612-5�5-5775
1-800-753-5775
May 18, 1993 rAx 595-5773
Mr. Rick Wolfsteller
City Administrator
City of Monticello
250 East Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362
RE: Architectural Consulting Services
Public Facility Survey And Evaluation for Compliance
with the Americans with Disabilities Act: 1991 (ADA)
OSM Proposal No. 0171.93
Dear Mr. Wolfsteller:
Engineers
Architects
Planners
Surveyors
This correspondence is in follow-up to our recent lunchtime conversation regarding an ADA
survey for the City of Monticello. Herein, we present our qualifications to conduct the
survey, critical dates in the ADA and their relation to this work, and some preliminary
thoughts about what the survey may entail for the City of Monticello.
As an overview, the ADA is a relatively new civil rights legislation that provides for
accessibility in new construction, remodelings, and existing facilities. This law affects public
facilities and services as well as private entities offering public programs (stores, restaurants,
etc.). As such, accessibility is a concern architects and engineers now deal with on a daily
basis allowing us to become well versed in its application. A list of our work in which ADA
compliance has been a primary concern includes:
Walker Art Center; Accessibility Assessment and ADA Training Seminar,
Minneapolis. MN
Madelia Light and Power; Accessibility Assessment
Madelia, MN
Munsinger and Virginia Clemens Rose Garden
St. Cloud, MN
Logan Avenue Bridge, Minnehaha Creek
St. Cloud, MN
Hester Park and Water Treatment Plant
St. Cloud, MN
t,wi o�.ruw rte....
Mr. Rick Wolfsteller
May 18, 1993
Page 2 of 3
Veterans Memorial Park
City of Richfield, MN
Southview Boulevard Streetscape
City of South St. Paul, MN
Additionally, please find attached a letter from the Walker Art Center, one of our recent
clients for whom we performed an extensive accessibility survey in 1992. We hope you can
agree that OSM is fully capable of providing Monticello with a survey tailored to its facilities
and objectives for compliance with the ADA.
Title 11 of the ADA requires that all services, programs and activities provided by or made
available by public entities, state and local governments, etc. must not discriminate against
individuals who are disabled. The effective date for this legislation is January 26, 1992 As
per our conversation, and discussions I've had with the Minnesota State Council for the
Handicapped, any location offering a program to the public must be accessible. Also, the
City must insure that no employment discrimination exists for qualified individuals based
on its policies (Title 1) and facilities (with allowances for "reasonable accommodations" and
"undue burden"). Please note that I have enclosed some information from our ADA files
regarding employment policies. (1 have previously sent similar information to John Simola).
At this point, it is difficult to be specific on the magnitude of the survey for Monticello since
we are unsure of the total services and facilities affected. However, we do have a distinct
advantage of working "in-house" with Mr. Bret Weiss. Through Bret, we are able to obtain
facility information which should enable the survey to proceed with a high degree of
efficiency. In a short discussion with Bret, we have already identified a potential list of
affected facilities:
City Hall (public access for paying utility bills. council meetings, etc.)
Library (building/stack access)
Liquor Store
Waste Water Treatment Plant (are school tours conducted?..etc)
Parks and Shelters
Senior Citizens Center
Fire Hall
Our first step would require on-site verifications of this list to identify the extent of the
survey. From this, a proposal for our fee to complete the survey work may be submitted.
Once this is accepted, we would then proceed into a location by location compliance survey.
Please note that this work would include services to identify compliance deficiencies only
and any work to design and engineer modifications would be additional.
Mr. Rick Wolfsteller
May 18, 1993
Page 3 of 3
Rick, we hope you find this information useful and we welcome the opportunity to assist the
City of Monticello in creating accessible environments within all of their facilities. Thank
you for your time and please feel free to call me at 595-5644 with any questions or
comments.
Sincerely,
ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
Dou as D. Wild, AIA
Project Architect
C: John Simola, City of Monticello
GFU\BAW, OSM
H:\ARCH\SU\DD W\W0LM12'LLT
R _o I _,
Walker Art Center
Oe•Sehale5l Aayeroe
Vineland Place
Minneapolis MN 55403
J UI, 1 0 I: S,2
Tel 612.375.7600
Fe• 612.375.7518
IPian?. r::a o:rrvia:m:I•^ ;;�;;
nu.
i
July 9, 1992
To Whom It May Concern:
The firm of Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc.. (OSM), recently completed a
facility survey and evaluation of the Walker Art Center for compliance with the new
Americans with Disabilities Act : 1991 (ADA). The Architectural Consulting Services
provided to our organization were instrumental in developing and implementing a
comprehensive plan which addresses the new Civil Rights Ad.
The final survey documentation provided to the Walker An Center was developed and
tailored to specifically address our concerns and requirements related to our long tern
goals and objectives associated with ADA. The survey was well organized and
allowed us to quickly and easily develop an understanding of the deficiencies within
the facility in order to prioritize our work effort in correcting them.
We were extremely pleased with the consulting services provided by OSM, and the
professional attitude exhibited while conducting the survey is to be commended.
Throughout the survey we found OSM's architectural services to be of the highest
quality and professional integrity, and would recommend their services for any type of
ADA Consulting.
Sincerely,
v� G/
ohn Lied
Manager of Building Operations
Council Agenda - 5/24/93
o. Consideration of bids and award of annual sealcontinr uroicet. U.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
This year's sealwating involves approximately 66,000 sq yds of city streets
somewhat scattered across the community from Prairie Road and Marvin
Elwood Road on the west end of the community to portions of the industrial
park. Sealed bids were received at 10 a.m. on Friday, May 21. Four hids were
received, and the lowest Base Bid A, which includes all sweeping, was from
The Astech Corporation of St. Cloud for $34,000.30. Our estimated cost for the
project was $33,010. A copy of the hid tabulation is enclosed for your review.
B. ALTEI{NATIVE ACTIONS:
I. The first alternative would be to award the 199;3 scalcoating project to
The Astech Corlxaration for $34,000.30.
2. The second alternative would he not to award the project.
C. STAFF RWOMMENDATION:
Itis the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the Council accept
the bids and award the project to The Astech Corporation, who performed well
on our 1992 project, for $34,0W.:10 as outlined in alternative A1.
1). sui)mR'fING IATA:
Copy of bid tabulation. Please refer to Council agenda of 4/26/93 for details as
to the actual locations of this year's sealcontiag project..
10
CITY OF MONTICELLO
BID TABULATION
BITUMINOUS SEALCOAT PROJECT SC 93-1
Friday, May 21,1993 --10 am.
SEALCOAT.TAB: 5/21/93
Item I
Item II
Name/Address of Bidder
Base Bid 'A"
Alternate Bid
1. Allied Blacktop Company
$.56.5/sq yd
$.495/sq yd
Maple Grove, MN
$37,301.30
$32,679.90
2. Caldwell Asphalt Co., Inc.
$.560/sq yd
$.505/sq yd
Hawick, MN 56246
$36,993.60
$33,360.30
3. Bituminous Roadways, Inc.
$.6327/sq yd
$.5735/sq yd
Minneapolis, MN 55403
$41,770.85
$37,862.47
4. Astech Corporation
$.515/sq yd
$.485/sq yd
St. Cloud, MN
$34,000.30
$32,019.70
SEALCOAT.TAB: 5/21/93
Council Agenda - 5/24/93
Q, Qpnaidpnntion of r nlneina_ two waRte Rctivpletl al.,.dop pumila wt the
wastewater treatment plant. I.J.S. 1
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
Due to the constraints of topography and site sire limitations, more than 60
pumps were incorporated into the design of the Oily -s wastewater treatment
plant. Almost all of the pumps were supplied under if low hid package deal
from Walder Pump & Equipment Company through the general contractor, the
Paul A. Lawrence company. The City. through its Kngineer, rejected several
of the pumps supplied in the package, namely, the air -operated diaphragm
pumps for moving settled sludge at the wastewater treatment plant. This
rejection ultimately cost the City Engineer lens of thousands of dollars due to
the proprietary nature of the spec.
Many of the other pumps supplied at the wastewater treatment plant met. the
specifications hot were really not well suited to the operating conditions (or
materials pumped. (.)ne such set of pumps supplied were the 9 units for waste
activated sludge. scum, and sludge booster pumping. 'These pumps included
in the low hid package were manufactured by M.D. 1`neunua.ics out of
Springfield, Missouri, and consisted of a rather unique intricate set of lopes or
impellers which were gear driven and then sl>eed controlled by hell type
sterling variable speed drives. The pumps began failing within it few years
after their initial installation. and the cost of repairing and keeping these
pumps operational wits hecoming significant. A single lube for the punhps cost
$639. It, was almost impossible to have new ones properly machined, and
building up [lie old lubes proved costly and inenlicicnl. In the mid -till's, M.D.
Pneumatics went out of business, and thus the availability of parts ceased
almost immediately. Since there were backups for Tach set of pumps, the Cily
began cannibalizing the backup pumps in order In keep at. least two pumps
operational in each area.
In ISM, we placed an amount of $1(1,(1(111 in the budget fear replacement of some
of the scum punhps, its at that, Lime it. appeared (hut. they were a higher
priority than the waste activated sludge pumps. Utwnn getting deeper into the
pump problem, how'e'ver, we found that. replacement pumps were extremely
costly. and we needed to have it letter plan Lu make the maximum use out of
the existing punnps while integrating new punnps into the system.
This winter, after careful consideration, City staff and I G came lu the
conclusion that we should replace two of the waste activated sludge pumps as
soon as possible utilizing progressive cavity pumps, gear driven, and variahle
M
Council Agcnda - 5/24/93
speed driven with a variable frequencv drive. PSC developed a procedure for
pump replacement by hringing a pump expert in from another wastewater
treatment plant in Ohio. By purchasing the prngressive cavity (Mawno) pumps
and gear drives through PSG in Ohio and purchasing variable frequency drives
locally, we can save several thousand dollars on the installation of two pumps.
The pump and drive packages, including tax, will come to about $16,000 for
the pair. With I ;5C doing all of the in-house installation except electrical, we
expect material cost to be in the neighlxrrhood of $2.111111. This would bring the
totaal expenditure to approximately $19,000. We will then use the one
remaining lobe pump as at temporary backup should the need arise. We are
continuing to study the scum pump situation and will have reports back to the
Council at a later dale on the possible replacement of those pumps.
B. AurERNATIVR ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative into authorize replacement of two waste activated
sludge pumps based upon an estimated total cost. of $19,000.
2. The second alternativewould he to replace a single pump: however, this
dues not appear to fulfill our needs, as a minimum of two fully
operational pumps is needed.
:1. The third alternative would be to do nothing, and this dues notappear
to he practical either, IIA we will soon he facer) with failure of the waste
activated sludge pumping system tit, the wastewater treatment. plant.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It. is the recommendation of the Public Works Director and Kelsic MtCuire,
Project Manager (if the wastewater treatment plant lirr PSG, that the City
Council authorize replacement. of the two waste activated sludge pumps as
outlined in alternative 111. his assumed that the pumps can lx replaced and
operaLinnal by mid -summer.
1). S1J11PORTINC DATA:
Copy of memo dated May 18, 1993, from PSQ Copy of report from EA Rogers
of I ;SC: on pump replacement dated April 29, 199:1; Copy of quote from Walder
Pump for replacement of waste activated sludge pump dated September 24,
1492: Copy of detail sheet on csisting lobe liner pumps.
12
I PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES GROUP, INC.
M E M O It A N D U M
TO J. SIMOLA
FROM K. McGU1RE
DATE SIL91 S
RE Report on WAS pump replacement recommendation
Attached is Lire report prepared by Mr. Ed Rogers of our
Strongsville Ohio Project with specific recommendations on
replacement of our WAS pumps. It appears that significant
savings (in Lite neighborhood of $000 or more per pump) can be
realized bnsed on PSGs discount with this equipment vendor and by
doing this simple retrofit Ln house. I would also agree with Ed
that we not use Lite VFD make and model he was quoted as it is of
Austrnlinn mnnufacture that 1 have not herd of.
I recommend that we replace two pumps now and cannibalize
remaining lobe pump parts to keep one running as a backup pump.
We also dlscus—d From Pump replacement. He suggests that we use
n simple centrifugnl pump for this function. We have spare
motors we can use, I will get quotes on just the pump.
cc L. DreimhursL
1
1
ti
r
1101 Hut Blvd., Montic,14 MN 55162
612129&2229 FAX 61212954779
�9r �
13110FESSIONAL
SERVICES GROUP, INC,
DATE: April 29, 1993
TO: Kelsie McGuire, Project Manager
FROM: Ed Rogers, Maintenance Supervisor
SUBJECT: Waste Activated Sludge Pumps
On April 19, 1993 1 visited the Monticello, MN Wastewater
Treatment Facility to evaluate the waste activated sludge pumps.
The pumps now in service are MD lobe line pumps which are worn
past their usefulness. Parts are no longer available which make
a complete rebuild an impossibility.
Cunstant wasting is required at rate of 10-100 GPM at 30' TO11.
Tito material being pumped is sludge with a concentration of 2% to
Sy. solids. Because of Lire wide range of flow rates required and
the limited space available, the options for replacement are
limited. Based on my experience 1 would recommend the lube pumps
be replaced with progressive cavity style pumps. To control tim
pumping rates a variable frequency electric drive is recommended.
The existing belt drive speed reducers now in use are a high
maintenance Item and not electrically cost effective.
Tim installation of the new pumps could be done in-house by PSS
1mrscnurel using the existing pump bases and moot of the existing
piping. The pump bases would have to be extended 3 feet. A 4"
steel {elate could be welded on top of the bastes on also and to
make up Live height difference between the shaft of tiro pump and
tlm yoarbux, end to provide an extended base for the new
assemblies. Tito discharge pipe, could be moved a" center Ilne of
t1m pumps and 4" X h" reducing elbows installed to allgn Lim
dischargo of LIm new isumps with the existing piping. Tho
horizontal ly-run suction Imes could be shorterred by
approximately 12 inches and an "Insta-flange" installed to align
them Lo Live now pumps inlet. The existing inlet olbows could be
roused if a 1.79" spacer is installed between the elbu►ws and the
pump inlets.
17119 Sprague (load, Stmnipvllle, Ohio 11136
OMos 019) W4ftW Fast MG 2MIU
Kelsie McGuire
April 29, 1993
Page Two
The variable frequency drives could be installed an the wall by
the existing motor starters, and the control wiring could be
pulled through the existing electrical conduit.
I have enclosed a price quote, specifications, and warranty
information for the recommended equipment. Although the quote
Includes a speed control unit, I recommend a local vendor be
contacted and a price quote obtained. A local vendor would
insure quick repair service, if needed, and possibly provide a
service contract.
If you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact
me at the PSG -Strongsville, OH Project.
U
P.S.G., Inc.
17449 Sprague Road
Strongsville, Ohio 44136
Please Olde( I o.n
E. P. Schultz 6 Associates, Inc.
13232 Enterprise Parkway
Cleveland, Ohio 44135
Phone: 216/676-9111
FAX: 216/676-9776
FAX:
PHIINF
PROPOSAL NUMBER qEV. DATE PAGE I INQUIRY DATE YOUR INQUIRY NO. SALES CODE
SLSM JOB I.D. APPL. N0.
119 93047 01 1 4/22/93 1
I
I
0—
(D -
p(.,.,....,,,,. ambient
(j)- m med i um
ps.b.. 3%
I
Q . cast iron
tool steel
(lam+ins.., Dack Ino
ITEM CITY
1 Moyno Pump Model 1F036G1 CDQ AAA $4,585.00
2 1 Eurodrive Gearmotor Model IR70DV132-S4, 7.5 IIP, 254 RPM P 60 Hz, IEFC, energy
efficient rated for variable speed service, 3/601230-460 vac input
$1,251.00
3 1 Zener Speed Controller Model #MSC -M13. cons tani'torque, oil tight enclosure with
speed pat., FWD-REV-STOP/reset switch. " ') "' '\ II
11,700.00
AVVIIO. IUTAL WEIG111IPIUCEF00 UNIT NET I CITY. I NET TOTAL
Cleveland, Ohio
I1111d5IPnOPOSAL LIICCIIVE 114OU
Net 30 days
S111PMLN1 6 WEEKS AIT Ln APPROVAL SIGNED 1•.�-
10 PHOCEFU WI111 WORN
MIER H'1 . (-- F.".—
AUT I IOnIZLD mSTnIOUT on OF ROBBINSA MYERS. INC, FLUIDS HANDLING GF70UP
ITEM REFERENCE OR NUMBER
Waste Activated Sludge Pump
CONDIT IONS OF SERVICE
0_,NW enc,lplon
sludge
p .P..,
10 - 100 GPM m ,,,,,,. P.m .
_ .
flooded pNPSHA-1. -
_
ODncn AN.
15 psi GNPs. wa' --..._
Q.a.,.. n.. o.. 24
�phV— -
__ _
Z)O."CKH continuous
PUMP DESCRIPTION
Q.n— tool steel/chromed
pwNma
1109* fig-
&— Buna N
0.P
7.5
(.i&— b 111" flo.
n, sP..a
30 - 300 PRM
DESCRIPTION OF UNIT
1 Moyno Pump Model 1F036G1 CDQ AAA $4,585.00
2 1 Eurodrive Gearmotor Model IR70DV132-S4, 7.5 IIP, 254 RPM P 60 Hz, IEFC, energy
efficient rated for variable speed service, 3/601230-460 vac input
$1,251.00
3 1 Zener Speed Controller Model #MSC -M13. cons tani'torque, oil tight enclosure with
speed pat., FWD-REV-STOP/reset switch. " ') "' '\ II
11,700.00
AVVIIO. IUTAL WEIG111IPIUCEF00 UNIT NET I CITY. I NET TOTAL
Cleveland, Ohio
I1111d5IPnOPOSAL LIICCIIVE 114OU
Net 30 days
S111PMLN1 6 WEEKS AIT Ln APPROVAL SIGNED 1•.�-
10 PHOCEFU WI111 WORN
MIER H'1 . (-- F.".—
AUT I IOnIZLD mSTnIOUT on OF ROBBINSA MYERS. INC, FLUIDS HANDLING GF70UP
ROP Delleclor Increases PC Pump 1118
Apr.rgrc„Ing rwily pun.p with a
fiber dcllcc'on Is mwccsarully ham
dling primary sledge mol rttlnc'inl;
,y'SI r#I. malut co:mcc fn a Kanas
avaslcwalrr 111:11".cut pl:uu. The
lily of 1 -...rawer it,, I C of a Icd.
#rat "is".:. upgr:ulyd it pump sys.
tem in 1974 liven its plain 11-31
ca pandcd bum a primary to a sce.
"ochry item l"cnl sytucn.. 1,11 gwss•
iug racily (l'C) pumps m:mufa,vmrvd
by Il, 6hin, fi My"'. Inc wl n• int
mall.rd at III;,[ time
'tint ,lura, vv.uer pollufiun umind
superintrndrnl sur Leaven.vnnh,
saiI
dl:n IIrr Aloyuo I'1; pumps ham
die the uansle. .d svl#Ird pliwmy
,Imlgr boor r lar ihns to holding;
lank,, and hnm Il,.• hidduq; #:u.ks lu
racoon. hlu•rs lr,r Jrw:u erlug
•I'he fauliI y, whish .:r ves 39,000
lesld.•nts, pr ndm r, :131 avc#agc of
four d1 y urns of solids tier day In.
conth:g v:wavi'ater, --aging four
mllll"n gallons tier day, passes
thunlgh bar wrerns bili ter bring
puny.rd to oro grit rr•mua 1 basins.
Uuting gds rrmoval, the ,-nslrw•atrr
is ,rratrd, ams heavy solids, such as
sand and gravel, srrtle and are re.
moved. Next h. Owporn c,s are iliac
prlmal y r lar Ilius, ,'hrle live At.,pm
pumps Dander sludl;e and scum to
five shnll,c holding tanks. '1 hice art.
rlilloml I it,% of the same make
nu.ve sludge Item Ihr•sc lucks to two
va"Imm filler, :dread of dew•atel Ing.
The shlrlge mvt.agcs Ihn•c In rive
pew I mAida Iracing the clarlliers,
and film- to fell prrcem ""lids c(,ur
ing out of Ihr holding tanks
Irungt, handliult 1)'pically abraslvr
primary sludge n(trn rrgrdw main-
tenance alter I-., nr flowc )eats. Ilul
Mike Ilaskas, malnlcm, :c inn panic
fin the have --till wastewater fa•
c llity, w1ritus that It took 14 )cats,
until 198H, hr(ote dw• DfuS'nn PC
units needed their slalom+ or rulers
replaced. And that vias hel,c—I ht
be di#n dy #dated u. the gr11 syslcm
6rraking down, w'Irl.h resulhJ In
raln•nrrly ahrJ+lir rl.alellal flowing
duolfgh the pungw.
'Ihr City ul I.cavcnwrtrlh hrgan
.M IrJfrnnnla .liflnf,rlrr ia[Mtl' u... Alelrq rrrprn3rna rnvlt manrf M Ifanf IN'/erre, JM'_. IJ MA;ry
lan.f and Iran In ho vJcuwn lillnf AN, 14,11f, nuinlmanrr nrrrMmC. PenKf I.,—P nfla.an,fn
1111111 :,11111; hl IIrIt 111115 Illi 11KN),rlil'"
In 1990, and will haat replaced all
right IIA•1... C file rod of this )car.
'These new• pump, ha,e.. a liber Jr
flccorr lealrw. ha,kas cnplaincd,
••Ilei re five lilhcr dcllca,lur option
,_a available, a mechanic had to
#cath Into the pump will, pliers 11,
dl,lodge fain With fire librr deflec•
I- in place, rag,, sllingy mawtials,
and oliva prcvton,ly imuhlruunc
s.IhJs randy 11111 Ihr ougi....
Thr prior iple of operallon ul a
prngrr„ing ca%ily pnnga Is dcccliti.
vely simple, even though the peon#
city ul it., puulpiug clemems 1,135•
optica# cnnlplca •1 Ire concept Int
voles a single hrllcal ruler w—Ing
ccrcnld, ;dl). w•iddn a double hclleal
stator of Is1lcc Ihr pilah Icngih. Kry
c-tilmmrnfa are the mb.r 2nd the
stat u.'I hr fur mer Isasl,lgle crtcrnal
hrliv with a nnu..I cnlssscrldm.,
plechlnu mar hhwd hom high
mtengdl ,bol. ,fill a later ul hald
rlimmiunl pLuiug fur ulnashm icsb-
fail. r Fire '131w is A duolife Imrrnal
Iw•hs molded .4m. nbl:lsl"n•n•simAnt
Clad un.rr, p .11mmently bonded
wlthln an all y 111-1.1 lube. I:Iast. #owes
pnrvldc Wwrv,lun rvahmncc, because
dwy .Jn dclonn fu accununnttale
large 111#111 la•s, 'Ihvr.e cunywnunin
enable a comlm-S,ilc lit to hr corgi.
necred baleen Il,c toter and,imoi,
which gru—mv, a selfpl(ndug ca.
pahilily and allulvs gascous, low• and
high ciset"lly Ilulds In be pu.tit 1.
As tie Imor hu ns lvlthin the stator,
a sales of scaled cavitie., 180 de.
grecs 211311. are 1111111CII, ,11X11 nude
along the pt .nq. honl suction In
dischaige. As nor, raalty uprnq the
opposing cavity der reales Io .sin• at
exactly Orr sank rale to ptndof v a
troll polsadnlp poslthe disptan•n u•nt
Itnw. The continuous scat hcmcm
Ow Imm and sblt"r helices keeps the
I1.11d moving shadily at a lived If,,,,
late pnrlw)rtlunal It, the mutioial
sperd ofill, pump.
'Ihr drhlgn In -11 ccs uo plslum,
raters, w 11ndng gears to wear nut
nr gun, up, whirl, simplifies nlaf Ile.
":ince and nllnl... lies #o,ls Ila -1.
Sat ilk) pct ndts 11-11-#11 different stirs
I., be ,prdfcd Irn a gi".l appll.a•
Ilan, Ilm sclr.11on of PC puny” Is
hew tell to c,prrlcncrd Individual,
CAIS, art escluske rnmpmer scicc•
floor pn.gtanl, Is offered by the
Atoyno manuha lufer to simpllly the
m'curme w1c,H1m of dM pomp first
sullcal for an application.
I'm Mrs Worraorl" 0. (his #201##1.
wilt In 1700A the order Melo curl.
%AtI IIll %I- ol,clt A Al—p ,, ni. A1•Ir II I'My
1A
-1 ER S
d-
BOBBINS 8 MYERS, INC.
o
FLUIDS HANDLING DIVISION
l
MOYNO'� 2000 PRODUCTS
LIMITED WARRANTY AND CLAIMS POLICY
n
The following statement of our Moyno 2000 Products Warranty and Claims Policy is Intended
to assist our customers In understanding the terms of our limited warranty, the circumstances
.�
under which we will honor claims, and the procedure for making claims.
This Warranty and Claims Policy should be read In conjunction with and Is subject In all
respects (except for the length of our warranty on Moyno 2000 Products) to the terms and
,yam
conditions of sale which appear on our quotation and acknowledgement forms and the specific
-�
terms of any distributorship or other such agreement between us and the Individual customer.
n
t. Limited Warranty on Each Moyno 2000 Product.
We warranty each Moyno 2000 Product to be free from defects in material and workmanship
d_
for a period of three years from the dale of shipment from our factory or distribution center.
o�
Our liability under this warranty or In connection with any other claim relating to our Moyno
2000 Products Is limited to the repair, or at ouropllon, the replacement of refund of the purchase.
or
price, of any such Products or pads or components thereof which are returned to us freight
prepaid and which are defective In material or workmanship.
o�
AS THE USE OF PARTS MANUFACTURED BY OTHER THAN ROBBINS 6 MYERS, INC.
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO ADVERSELY AFFECT PUMP LIFE, SUCH USE MAY SERVE TO VOID
d•
1HISWARRANTY.
a
d.
2. Products of Other Manulaclurars.
.i
We make no warranty with regard to any Products, Including but not limited to electrical
cunrpenunls W uquipnronl end utlt0r prime movers, which are purchaocd !or u----!-. z:: -.-.--!!on
with Moyno 2000 Products but are not manufactured by us. The only warranty which attaches
to such PnxJucIs Is that wananty, if any, of the manufacturer of such Products. Our Customer
cr
Service Department should be consulted if our customers have questions as to whether particular
-�
Products aro covered by our warranty or are separately warranted by their manufacturers.
n
3. Limitation of Liability.
n
r
The only warranty which we make to our customers Is that warranty which is act forth on
-�
our quotation and acknowledgement forms and which Is summarized above. WE DO NOT MAKE
ANY OTHER EXPRESS WARRANTIES OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING ANY IM.
f,
PLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
OR USE.
In addition, we do not assume and we expressly disclaim any liability for (1) any SPECIAL,
INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEOUENTIAL DAMAGES which anyone may suffer as the
result of the sale, delivery, servicing, use, or loss of use, of any Product, or (it) may charges of
expenses of any nature which aro Incurred without our express written consent, oven In ough
we have leen negligent.
Our total liability undor our wananly of In connection with any claim Involving any Product
Is expressly limited to the purchase price of the Product In respect of which damages are
t...
claimed.
4. What Is Not Covered By Our Warranty; Typos of Damages and Claims For Which We Are
}r
Not Rosponslblo.
Z21
The following are oxamplos of the kinds of defects which are not covered by our warranty:
f�
defects which aro caused by Improper Installation, normal wear and loaf, Improper or abnormal
ri
use or operation, or Impropor storago or handling; defects caused by our customer's failure to
f -;
pmfunn normal proverdlvo maintenance; defects caused by the use of replacement parts not
mmrufaeturod or supplied by us; defects caused by repairs by persons not authorized by us;
r
defects caused by modificatIons at alterations made by our customer; and any damage to any
Y ;
Moyno 2000 Product occuning while It to In out customer's possession, Since these aro examples
and not a complete list, we suggest that ourcustomorecontaclout Customer Service Department
r+
11 they have any questions concerning the scope of our warranty.
i
JR0EEINS
THE MOYNO 2000 MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE
JRCEEINS THERE S A MOYNO 2000 THAT CAN SOLVE
IMYERS
MINIMUM MAINTENANCE AND DOWN-TIME
iMYERS YOUR PARTICULAR PUMPING PROBLEM
tA.FauJOG..;ti.
LOW MAb/Ti11AMM DOME ND Om111ZIND PUDM00L111019 5
THE MOYNO .20W VALUE PRATUOU YOTM02000 OPTDMS Fpr
MMOL THE IIOT1102000
OMa.MroMN+w ?.. uow•a KPNMM•yb rb OaaNrY
TMM0UGM0aSIOMEV0LUr4M •Nrory+br M6r•arbb SKCUI MTUATOWS
wwrrONbObO+N+10.1r
brr srwtawy[.10ry �D'•r+ab wWOtabarW.ww Owbrwrya
W&t100rP r�wrNWtOrr aaMMON++abw rNry+wr�
M ISM .aN apnr Wranw�cr, nm.r+Ybwrarb r•b N'aa as vb.�u j'JG'I q,m:.r.•a•.4r�
1Fwyrdq Maw Oma,+Praby - __
tlAEMMMYIiMMLM!
7Ma�l7MOrraAOaa*yY7rbr wrwgo�row*aMaY
7w'b AMbl aHrO�Ob/rtMr• 1L �+/Orebydrb MEl+tlpara
EIIaw+Pa.aw++Np+Orntaa.aY mr .wwr•ranaorwrow roaK lnacn. •yow awwgNo
twls.bw aWaMalb+rM1r00 waybraanA rw aoxwon OYtlw+rbw r+wa.ra Tyr
I.b►w+00rM+r.raw prw.ra
Allrrerwga+aea•+M p+.w.cM
arca OMaOEIMOIwaarl0at wwMa710 rt.wabrwPiO a
r.a. wtrrwSN a.w+nw vw. d+ry.O.rrMb
OaO.WMtlAr*wr*yw10w .Srrnw+a[lrparpa Nyo wc"�
OOrlb AliOMVNpbaN wO�y rian+ANSI A>pab aaw.+rrw .MbM ala+rbrinaprrr rw
Ir�ryb•wbw a.wrrbar Sawa
Atir MwIM b:Oa+rwwrr- irYrtildpwypr
brPlSr rna.a rnr.0.b+0 eb+dONaw vrwbn.yY
•Lm'wrrw rN.rribw.
raarrvmrMsrw+wrN+Tlar
woM.n.
wM S1aMa.Mraanrbr MOM rSMarwwwrywaO•wblr
arlrwsbvw..y u•.Y aan9l0w
0y r+lr wriyVw..w a>p YMrwbrbacab+rr wrw+
aaeMrbNr.yargiva
blww. ywyr
MwA.rwM aNn r+aa.. wr.bN dw..bMaarbry un44br
wrrr+nrM7 oaorb ArwryMt Ar/. rv+draM r.w
aWOq.arY
i tiN0aC0araww0'daaaVN�O
wrb/.rrMCbaaadi.NgP..Y NOwI
OabsMMMa .6MOMt rriM rOw�1+iMVbGa NraOiMba
brrr nOly .aradaa•rryw
wr.w.lr�w�r C. 4
t11�VE MYITCOMIIMIMW
waracvw0 de0+ryu.A ww ar.lwbr.OYyarra+ytas+o� .YtOrrrra baht aq.[wdy
w•er.MwM +'anorrbalrnw^wdM wwa
aw rbawbnrurww
y+w.wewrwarwwoybr+
0011LgM1EEK IN
ww.wue+.*»-••r.v.w+
AaOUrF wrObdrr wnaln..0+r .rl,w aaa Wno•wswmw .n..+
tTwwra.ye�wa++.rloa+
OV+warNrr/M dyr •rrw
OOba+rr Ma>♦+s wbbboo bows.r.a.rrdwbA'i aVr~MMr r+"dO^�on tiara
rba+PW wyiM+ab waway.Nal
./1+12 OrdIIP+Or Nln000T
rraeNr ♦/aFrurdM wawa r lrbaaoYN lkM,vrnuonMa
awm,
wrwwM w•Ora.P.w we
TM ry✓MM��ra yalrr rN
MtIAIl000aw�iralrnO a.r. awwrarlrNAA daA MKFraM.yMr
gaeab wariw.+�iraN
rNwrwww
MwaOaY r+1r01wiM1Etr.i
NP.+bOa.wr+arbnb0rwrn
+aan
.T brM glrb W."
MMOMIMFMwNwMMM oV.eww.ra na+aAwrrsy MAN NSa 6—
aa.wTIEOMLTTIIMOTEYI
"a ONLY T1111111111 "Mr✓rrwwyMaaraR wOr�r
MM10MT1'MTMBOA Ell alo+arrr'rwrOrbrVrw.
rwr...Arw.r�AgPlMa�an
rwS,srwranMa+-y.rw.rrr
trOMyoNwwaworrrr.
NMra.wulMiwrrl wbaM OlMa000lba daaadMrgN �rrrNwrw��warga
rrw.waaa wOyMraANwM
A Cab.wrrnr ayy,dTr O
iw.wbr/1"V
A
t+aar+ewrray arrwN 2oet nbraaarrwwrw rM\4+.ItDMa
' �
aoVwr wra rc.q.r
V
rwwawrrrwwraab�N. rrM MSOrldIMMarwr Nr
0.0004
OYNrbw rrwy,waar+w wp baalbaOb+rr�a wrrwaT
�•
•
wMr.wr _ �ww�iarwil
;0I
NOOTTIER PROGRESSING CAVITY PUMP PACKS SO MUCH LONG-LASTN• G.
LOW-MAPITENANCE PUMPING POWER IN SO LITTLE SPACE HERE S WHY
nb.s.bs�y+rwArw2am
aEw+ba.rraw+r sM ww tw.r
b�-r��tr wNMargbw
Ilr rMr•NNN
wbr NNY�b wyl rrnr .^I�i--JJ Il
1aa+da lYbrrwawrrbw
wrwa.w rwNar.�w Ilk. -
Nw 0a0 rw+arA baabra ara't �
.lrarirwn.a. rw wbr •1y
wrww rw +r wrwNa
V `/ `1Vap1+. •w++arwrwr il�.�-1,7�—LJ,.J
wrrr.wwwrMw.a�
alltr wrrwwbrrAew
yb.ary w aw �N.+rM r
Nigh 94% Geor CYS 10111 Severe Dul y
Performance Efficiency Built Tougle
liorsepo—., mhngs hom 33 Ihgher ougnd lorqua al Was the Readdy available wdh, fool w Conos+m resislanl consbnc
Io 180 putpul speeds aveeainle use of a smarter ft rsepo er flange mounting. . biakemolm Iron throughout kloddwalions
"o. 1133 l0 006 nPM Output molar Conserves energy ... single or multi speed =to evadable Io withstand harsh
torques to 141,6001b in. . Integral, scoop or C -lace operelirg eonddfons.
moloi mounlmg, and more.
09W
EURODRIVB
'•`.''.r�r��t* i['' r �+V �t'r Ali. {{t,4r. + i• � ,i.'.� r �� '.
�7��� ; � I 1 ��� � ... ,y.s .:> .... q. ,... �"•t•n�. -•" ..1;.,,4...x_ �.:"M,,.
WALOOR PUMP
S EQUIPMENT CO.
9700 HUMBOLOT AVE. 80.
11NNEAPOUS, MN 58431
.-HONE (812) 884-8384
September 24, 1992
FAX (612) 884-3239
hir. Kelsie McGuire
Professional Services Group Inc.,
1401 Hart Boulevard
Vlonticello, MN 55360
Dear Kelsie:
RE: Waldor Quotation 'I ND- 14153
Replacement Sludge Pumps
In followup to our discussion on September 8, 1992, we are pleased to
submit our proposal for the following equipment.
One ( I ) Tarby model CIETFSI-Cffj, 6'x6" progressive cavity
pump, rated to deliver approximately 10 GPM to 100 GPM
with Inline coupled IOHP TEFL, Reeves size 442 mechanical
variable speed drive, for 520 RPM to 66 RPM output speed
range. Unit to be base mounted complete with coupling guard
and drain r In).
PRICE - $1 1,950.00 FOB: Factory
SHIPIIENT - 6-8 weeks
This quotation Is offered In accordance with attached Waldor Standard
Terms and CondlLlons of Sale. Price quoted Is firm for a period of thirty
(30) days from this date.
We appreciate having the opportunity to work with you and If you have any
questions or If we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
DISTRIBUTORS OF
PUMPSOCOMPnESSORS 0 ELECTRICAL CONTROLS S INSTRUMENTATION • WATER 8 WASTEWATER TREATMENT EOUIPMENT
Page2
0INU- 14153
Sincerely,
WALDOR PUIP & EQUIPMENT COMPANY
Dick Erickson
DE/Jet
Attachment
09
AMZMf
Welcome To Tarby!
The Fastest Growing Progressing
Cavity Pump Manufacmm In The U.S.A.
W, =="d she N+ .pec kP p—S CK!w.P.4 ft* "
p.ro Om drarmm+rorrcea<ncr padan uarirctndeed anaam�ur'lmuh'aeLtn�uhW+Yhoar
cuvox++. wa rmpbver+ad mn wpphm.
Piedrhi
V .
M • is .
lsfJeh� 4w. C«�«i.1 `
[.p-yp.wtrr
(fir
bwpoH.w+•w-.
Qualin•Features
•«e e. �.-
4
lsfJeh� 4w. C«�«i.1 `
[.p-yp.wtrr
(fir
bwpoH.w+•w-.
II �
-37 60
0
MD LOBE LINE MAINTENANCE MANUAL
HEAVY 'DUTY PUMP
slo fm -'soot,, rv* Mr&N.
F14,l11 k 1A4+tiAIINO.wU.
i�t.W•(,�• A1G!1rIQ�L+.V�►A11`
iutill:l l yWYy
O Aca►1'4� rJ �!YR vt
M®D pneumatics Inc. ��-•:t-��-�
P. O. 13OX 2877, COMMERCIAL STAI ION • 4840W. KEARNEY, SPRINOFIE1,O, MISSOURI 85807
141718058710 .'
1� , � ..( lu�la.� . Pty+ •S3 4y' ,
8/77/1M v//1'
p
17
STEPS IN BELT I Page 9 (75)
REPLACEMENT Variable Speed Drives 75 & 76 Transmission Case
F
BE
K
AF
I. With diivr alupprd, Itann....idr Iv.rl '0'.
^. h—l. k.11 Irmirta I ' r ( Rigme I.1, w d rt•uu lar. Nig,-: C..tu 1 Ilu-
uumhrl ' I tool. xrrrwtxy In uanorr Il,r uul. nod mals n nntr of Ihr
uuudw•I. II trill Iw• ureraam lu glvr Ihr nn1 Ill,- c:mtr nut .. 1.-1 td luno, ill
Ill.- uplwnilr tlitnlitm... hro n•plariug It. Ix onlrl In l-Ime Ihr cnm,
Iw•II Iro.iun aeIt1q. Ala, wI" Ihat Iltr 0."1 ""w .,..I Iw• Ilut•nded the amnr
uun I... of tont. un Iwdh it."'Ill liml Iw•ming .hmdcc In•htrrn Ihr nim,I Ill(.umhnl letrm IAII )II'I'AN'I•: IhnI—
en el hrn Ihr jam nota m the
althrl trot I.-ating.hnula (Ilght Ila 1 Ihn•nd 1. 11 hoar lw•rn Intiniy-
Iwnilinurd ruI puryrr Iw•11 Iro.inn .riling—n„to :I„” Ilrflr 1Wl, at thr
t Wvi ul Ill-- Iw•h.nilh n 15.1wwnwl J.'11, ,I II... dlive Ir nl Ihr• 1:1 Inliu
1. 110.rngngr I,mhnl Levu, 1), hunt pulpy N,m fi.g I. .0,g 'I ( Figme
^)• Now Ihr IM- mI IIx• Imllt•y Iw•nting Imming T7.. Lith engnge thr
couhul Imvi. TI~ Iwn.ec mr maiLM'A" and "11 -.it, inked Iellrn un
Ihr trlge. Thr nmlrttl Imvr moat vs,pge Ihr annus Maarl in the %it-
Innitioll n'Ix•II I enca•mhlrng, �1
HEAVY DUTY M -D LOBE LINE
WITH SINGLE LOBE ROTOR
MODELS 4540, 5550, 6560
11336
-moi, 23 /33
9� , lam. ,
\ 12 922 24��. \� J� 7 4
T is K"
37 dp
0,31 25
D26 1
28 z(7,- / '13 18 a ��33 2
6
5 2 1� _ O , N32,,
-
30
40 39.
34
r 42
n I -
39 �r�✓'? 40
21 '
47 In .9 35
49.u4G0 �, ,
(+��! __
3B 4.4 "-37 31 4 �42 ^ t� �0 t
t r 1Y
Ism Oty. Name Item Oly. Naw" Item Oty. Nam.
1 B Bolt, 1lousing 19 2 'O' Ring, Adjust. 37 4 Stud, Gland
lerxt 2 9 Lrtckwashet, Housing 20 1 Shalt d Rotor Asi V. 38 1 'O' Ring, Pump
1 1. Pur"lI 3 1 Plup, Magnet is 21 1 Short d Rotor Asi V. 3D 16 Nul, Pump
4 1 Ptup, Pipe 22 7 Rat, Ring 40 16 Lockwesher, Putnp
nhn, Pump 5 1 Covet, Geer 73 2 Gear 41 1 Pall Filling, Inlet
lute, Inkn 6 1 Seal, Oil 24 7 Key, Geer 42 7 Gasket, Part
11"1 7 1 Plug, Expansion 75 2 Seal Gland 43 1 Pall Filling, Discharge
tinti, Oischav B 1 Gasket, Gest 20 2 Packing Sets 44 2 Seal Gland
.1.1 0 4 Beni Ing, Ball 71 2 Seel, We", 45 2 Pecking Sot
S"I 10 4 Sid. 28 7 Retaining Ring 40 1 Cm Ile', Bearing
Ilearing 11 1 8rnalhm Cop 29 1 Cover, Pump 47 2 Beer inp, Ball
0.11 12 1 Housing, Goat 30 4 Stud, Gland 48 2 Seal, Oil
I 13 2 Seal, Oil 31 4 Dowel 49 2 Plug, Espanslort
pensir"t 14 2 Dowel, Housing 32 2 Pips Plug 50 2 Fittings, Gresu
G-aw 15 4 Stud, Housing 33 2 Sat Screw 51 8 Bolt, Housing
,Wnq 10 1 Nameplate 34 1 Housing, Pump
17 4 Drive Screw 35 4 Stud, Pump
19 7 Adjusting Ring 30 2 Bushing, Pump
'11165803 ®D pneumatics inc. 4840 W. KEARNEY ST. SPRINGFIELD, MISSOURI 65803 U.S.A.
SP.0 FINANCIAL SYSTEM
05/03/93 11:02:22
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
btNtNAL VHtCKINI.
35055 04/27/93 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
35055 04/27/93 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
35055 04/27/93 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
35055 04/27/93 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
35055 04/27/93 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
35055 04/27/93 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
35055 04/27/93 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
35055 04/27/93 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
35055 04/27/93 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
35055 04/27/93 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
45055 04/27/93 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
35055 04/27/93 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
35055 04/27/93 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
35055 04/27/93 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
35055 04/27/93 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
3SOSS 04/27/93 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
35055 04/27/93 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
35055 04/21/93 LEAt,Ut OF MN CITIES
35056 04/27/93 OOTY/KAREN
35057 04/27/93 HEALTH PLANNING 4 MG
35059 04/27/93 U.S. POSTMASTER
35058 04/27/93 U.S. POSTMASTER
3SOS9 04/27/93 MN DEPART OF NATURAL
35060 04/27/93 MN DEPART OF NATURAL
35061 04/27/93 FERRY DEMMER
35092 04/77/93 MICROSOFT
35063 04/27/93 MINNESOTA HOMEWARD 5
35064 04/27/93 AOOPT-A•P(T
)SO6S 04/27/93 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO
35066 04/27/93 MARTHA $AIN?
35061 04/27/93 AROPLAX CORPORATION
15064 04/27/93 CELLULAR ONE
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Cl
243 INSURANCE PREMIUM 28.537.00
243 INSURANCE PREMIUM 4.383.00
243 INSURANCE PREMIUM 7.769.00
243
INSURANCE PREMIUM
598.00
743
INSURANCE PREMIUM
440.00
243
INSURANCE PREMIUM
865.00
243
INSURANCE PREMIUM
3.543.00
243
INSURANCE PREMIUM
1.020.00
243
INSURANCE PREMIUM
3.378.00
243
INSURANCE PREMIUM
6 77.00
243
INSURANCE PREMIUM
6.307.00
243
INSURANCE PREMIUM
688.00
243
INSURANCE PREMIUM
1.227.00
243
INSURANCE PREMIUM
29.00
243
INSURANCE PREMIUM
588.00
243
INSURANCE PREMIUM
3.166.00
243
INSURANCE PREMIUM
533.00
243
INSURANCE PREMIUM
274.00
59.037.00
48 TRAVEL EXPENSE 45.92
730 Pk OF SERV/MRA ).200.00
210 POSTAGE/SEWER MATER 8 1 13. 73
210 POSTAGE/SEVER WATER 8 1 13. 73
227.46
116 WATERCRAFT/ATV/SNOW R 393.00
116 TITLED WATERCRAFT 176.00
.90296 SELF DEFENSE CLASS 150.00
641 SOFTWARE UPGRADE 2.93
104 ANIMAL ADOPTIONS 670.00
4 ANIMAL ADOPTIONS 60.00
165 90 ANIMAL ADOPTIONS 3160.00
.60266 RECYCLING BINS REINS 9.17
101 EQUIPMENT LOAN Itb.aab. 7S
bbb CIVIL DEFENSE PHONE CM 40.69
*C1 0
*0
RRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
05/03/93 11:02:22
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENEkAt ChECAlnu
35069 04/27/93 OCA. INC
35070 04/27/93 GIRKELAND JR/STEPHEN
35071 04/77/93 MN DEPART OF NATURAL
35072 04/27/93 MN DEPART OF NATURAL
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Cl
731 INS PREM/JOHN MIDDEND 335.41
732 GMEF LOAN NO 006 42.500.00
118 WATERCRAFT TITLE 714.00
118 WATERCRAFT/SNOW/ATV k 648.00
35013 04/10/93 SUfFAL4, JUNCIION AMO 531 JUNK AMNESTY DAY/TIRES 63.00
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
05/04/93 07:11:32
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
35074 05/05/93 ASSOCIATED VETEPINAR
35074 05/05/93 ASSOCIATED VETERINAR
35075 05/05/93 BARCO PRODUCTS, INC
35075 05/05/93 BAPCO PRODUCTS. INC
35076 05/05/93 BEACON SPORTS PRODUC
35077 05/05/93 BORLAND PARADOX FOR
35078 05/05/93 FEEDRITE CONTROLS, I
35079 05/05/93 FIRE SAFETY CORPORAT
35079 05/05/93 FIRE SAFETY CORPORAT
35080 05/05/93 FOSTER- FRAN?EN-CARLS
35081 05/OS/93 HERMES/JERRY
15082 05/05/93 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFIC
35083 05/013/9) HOLMES 6 GRAVEN
31,004 05/05/93 J M OIL CO6MANY
35085 OS/05/9) LOCATOR • MONITOR SA
35086 05/05/93 MACQUEEN (OUIPMENT I
35081 05/05193 MARCO BUSINESS PROOU
35088 05/05/9) MEMPHIS NET 9 TWINE
45069 05/05/93 MIDWAY INDUSTRIAL SU
35090 05/05/9) MINNESOTA REBAR
)5091 0S/OS/9) MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO
45097 0$/Ob/63 MONTIC(LLO SENIOR Cl
3509) 0!/05/93 01 SON. USSET,AGAN I1
( 11,094 Ob/05/9) PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
Disbursement ,journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT C
683 MISC SUPPLIES/ANIMAL 9.24
583 MISC PROF SERV/ANIMAL 42.00
44.24
238 MISC SUPPLIES/WATER 52.01
236 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/SE 212.95
274.96
648 PARK EQUIPMENT 437.78
90297 SUBSCRIPTION/COMPUTER 159.00
56 MISC PROF SERV/MATER 51.00
595 GLOVES/MATER DEPT 45.25
595 GLOVES/SEWER COLL 45.24
90.49
61 INSURANCE PREMIUM 50.00
to LIBRARY CLEANING CONT 227.50
85 GAS/FIRE DEPT 114.01
86 LEGAL FEES/CUSTOM CANO 32.50
95 OIL/FIRE DEPT ?1.5?
434 REPAIRS/SEWER C OLL 90.46
104 STREET PARTS 152.04
106 MTC AGRMT/TYPEWRITERS 220.00
734 PARK SUPPLIES 607.77
114 REPAIR KIT/STREETS 131.43
733 REINFORCE BARS/ WARMING 213.00
185 ANIMAL CONTROL CONT 1.100.00
139 WjN7HLY CONTRIBUTIO 2,633.33
292 LEGAL FEES 1,102.50
175 WWTP CONTRACT PAYM 30,421.56
Ub
+i
s1
0
RRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
05/04/93 01:11:32
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
(itNtRAL CHECKING
35095 05/05/93 RIVERSIDE OIL
35096 05/05/93 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP
35096 05/05/93 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP
35097 05/05/93 T J HOPKINS
35098 05/05/93 VOSS ELECTRIC SUPPLY
35098 05/05/93 VOSS ELECTRIC SUPPLY
35099 05/05/93 WRIGHT COUNTY DEPT 0
35100 05/05/9) WRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP
GENERAL CHECKING
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
496
OIL/STREET DEPT
55.91
193
ESLD REPAIRS/PARKS
8.19
193
NEW WARMING HOUSE
634.11
642.40
135
PARK SUPPLIES
15.?9
409
LIGHT BULBS/PARKS
499.96
409
LIGHT BULBS/CITY HALL
24.78
$24.24
215
SAND/SALT MIX/SNOW 8
823.15
S1?
UTILITIES
8.64
TOTAL 40.110.40
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
05/05/93 15:02:12
,ARRANT DATE VENOOR
Gc;4";; .' a';CCri ii.G
35074 05/06/93 ASSOCIATED VEI(PINIAR
35074 OS/08/93 ASSOCIATED VETERIMAR
35101 0S/06/93 PINE RIVER WOOD PR00
35102 05/08/93 LUKACH/JOHN
35102 OS/06/93 LUKACH/JOHN
35102 05/06/93 LUKACH/JOHN
35102 05/06/93 LUKACH/JOHN
35103 OS/06/93 KOROPCHAK/OLIVE
35104 05/06/93 MN DEPART OF NATURAL
3S10S 05/06/93 MN DEPART OF NATURAL
35106 06/06/93 O'NEILL/J(FF
35107 05/06/93 AMCON BLOCK 1 PREC AS
Uib108 05/09/93 AME GROUP
35109 05/06/93 ARA CORY REFRESHMENT
15110 05/09/93 SIFF$. INC.
)Sill 05/09/97 DOUGLAS/SCOTT
35111 05/09/93 DOUOLAS/SCOTT
)Silt 05/09/91 DOUGLAS/SCOTT
35112 OS/09!91 rut RIVER CONCRETE P
)5113 05/09/93 G E SUPPLY
3S1t4 06/00/93 IC14A DISTRISUTION CI
)5115 05/09/93 K MART SIORE
)Sill OS/09/93 KEN ANOERSON TRUCE(IN
35117 05/09/93 LIEFERT TROCKINf.
15119 OS/09/93 MIN 19/400 USER OROU►
C bb119 06/09/93 140NIICILL0 CNAMNEfit 0
oil, t Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT C
083 CORRECT COOING 42.00CR
683 CORRECT COOING 42.00
0.00
736 PANELING/NEW WARMING 467.60
327 MILEAGE EXPENSE 30.33
327 MILEAGE EXPENSE 10.11
377 MILEAGE EXPENSE 10.11
327 MILEAGE EXPENSE 10.10
80.65
91 MILEAGE EXPENSE 46.20
118 WATERCRAFT TITLE 322.00
116 WATERCRAFT/SNOW/ATV R 903.00
161 TRAVEL EXPENSE 66.09
736 BLOCK/NEW WARMING H 3,620.86
6 NEW WARMING HOUSE 193.60
409 CITY HALL SUPPLIES 64.00
39b LATRINE RENTAL 70.26
61S REIMS/COMPUTER SOFTWA 277.90
CIS CONFEkEMCf/FIRE DEPT 100.00
675 MILEAGE EXPENSE 75.00
452.90
691 TRASH GUARD/STREETS 195.19
475 BATTERIES/RECYCLING R 139.04
I)1 SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 41.50
460 RAIN SUITS 24.00
591 PROF SERVICES/ANIMAL 19.99
350 FREI914TIWA061146 40L/8( 30.00
)00 ME11414SHIP DUES/C 9mL" 25.00
113 ANNUAL DUE$ 750.50
rr t
•L1
0
RRC FINANCIA'SYSTEM
05/05/93 15:02:12
AAkRANT DATE VENDOR
tiChC•(AL VMCI.N1Nu
35120 05/08/93 NORTHSTAR PET SUPPLY
35121 95/08/03 PAGE LINK
35121 05/08/93 PAGE LINK
35121 05/08/93 PAGE LINK
35121 05/08/93 PAGE LINK
351?1 OS/08/93 PAGE LINK
35121 05/06/93 PAGE LINK
35121 05/08/93 PAGE LINK
35121 05/06/93 PAGE LINK
35122 05/08/93 RENNER S SONS INC./E
35122 05/08/93 RENNER 8 SONS INC./E
35123 05/08/93 ROYAL TIRE Of MONTIC
IS123 05/08/93 ROYAL TIRE OF MON11C
1. y5124 05/06/93 SENTRY SYSTEMS
35125 05/08/93 ST CLOUD RAILRAOO $A
45176 05/06/9) TRUCK CRANE SERVICE
35127 05/08/93 UNOCAL
35178 05/09/93 WATERPRO SUPP13ES CO
35129 05/08/93 WRIGHT WAY SHOPPER
GENERAL CHECKING
Disourse" nt Journa'
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
686 006 FOOD/ANIMAL CONTR 572.45
703
PAGER
CHARGES
62.47
703
PAGER
CHARGES
21.30
703
PAGER
CHARGES
24.50
703
PAGER
CHARGES
21.30
103
PAGER
CHARGES
21.30
703
PAGER
CHARGES
21.30
703
PAGER
CHARGES
21.30
703
PAGER
CHARGES
21.30
214.17
181
WELL
INSPECTION/WATER
780.00
181
OIL/WATER
DEPART
30.00
310.00
227
TIRE
REPAIR/STREETS
278.21
927
PEPAIRS/PARKS
DEPT
33.30
311.51
188 ALARM AGRMT/FIRE STAT 126.00
140 WWTP CONST COSTS 575.10
739 REMOVE INK DIGESTER 7.4 00.00
213 GAS/FIRE DEPT 10.14
670 MEIER$. ETC/MATER 0 3.125.88
711 JUNK AMNESTY DAY AO ?98.75
TOTAL 20.884.96
Mc
s�
E.FC FItiANCIAL SYSTEM
09/01/93 '4:02:53
W ApRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECMING
35130 05/07/93 SHEARSON LEHMAN BROT
GENERAL CHECKING
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
559 INVESTMENTS 64.230 .00
TOTAL 64.230.00
0
BPC FIVANCIAL SYSTEM
05/07/93 12:37:03
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
35131 05/07/93 ARCA MINNESOTA. INC.
35132 05/07/93 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
3513? 05/07/93 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
35132 OS/07/93 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
3513? 05/07/93 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
35132 05/07/93 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
35132 05/07/93 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
35132 05/01/93 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
35137 05/07/93 BRIDGEWATER IELEPHON
3S132 05/07/93 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
35137 05/07/93 BRIDGEWATER IELEPHON
35133 05/07/93 0 8 K PEFUSE RECYCLI
35133 05/07/93 0 8 K REFUSE RFCYCLI
35134 05/0//93 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
35134 05/07/93 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
35134 05/01/9i MIUWt3T GAS COMPANY
35134 05/07/93 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
35/34 05/01/93 MIOW£9T GAS COMPANY
15135 05/0//93 MONTICELLO PAPER 9 S
35,136 05/07/93 PLAISTED COMPANIES.
35137 05/01/93 PSG INC
35131 05/07/93 PSG INC
3',138 06/07/93 UNI TOG RENTAL SERVIC
35138 05/01/23 UNITOG RENTAL SERVIC
35138 05/07/93 UNIT06 RENTAL SEPVIC
3513. OS/07/93 UN 1100 RENTAL SERVIC
35139 05/07/93 UNITOG RENTAL SERVIC
15119 09/07/91 UNI TOO R£NTAL SERVIC
35139 05/01/61 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVA
)5139 06/01/93 VASKO RU8BE9H REMOVA
3!139 06/0//9! VASKG RU8819M R£MOVA
35139 05/07/97 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVA
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
534 PROF SERV/JUNK ANNE 1.583.00
?4 PHONE CHARGES 690.11
24 PHONE CHARGES 88.60
24 PHONE CHARGES 47.53
24 PHONE CHARGES 36.37
24 PHONE CHARGES 103.56
24 PHONE CHARGES 56.22
24 PHONE CHARGES 13.50
24 PHONE CHARGES 106.98
24 PHONE CHARGES 37.34
24 PHONE CHARGES 76.30
1.206.51.
611 RECYCLING CONTRACT 2.787.20
811 RECYCLING CHGS/FLOR L 221.50
2.493.70
115 UTILITIES 92.95
115 UTILITIES 4.77
115 UIILIIIE,� 41.38
115 UTILITIES 146.73
11S UTILITIES 1.119.16
1.653.99
124 CITY HALL SUPPLIES 90.19
741 SAND/NEM WARMING HOUSE 49.00
.90300 REIMB/FAX MACHINE 319.40
.90300 FAX MACHINE PAPER 13.79
333.19
211 UNIFORM RENTAL CHO$ 14.00
211 UNIFORM RENTAL CMOS 12.95
?11 UNIFORM RENTAL CHO$ 14.00
211 UNI«1RM RENTAL CH46 14.00
711 UNITORM RENTAL CHO$ 67.11
411 UNIFORM RiNTAL CHO$ 52.10
178.17
624 "46"1 CONTRACT PV 6.641.80
626 SALtS TAY/GARBAGE CON 361.12
524 OIL CART/$NO* 6 0ANA4E 20.00
574 LEAF PICKUP CHAkG16 7.700.00
9.5/4.62
%. UNIRAL CHICKIMd TOFAL 16.886.47
ESRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
OS/11/93 07:58:50
4ARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
35140 05/13/93 MINNESOTA RE8AR
35141 05/11/93 AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS
35147 05/11/93 CENTRAL MCGOWAN, INC
35143 05/11/93 FEEDRITE CONTROLS, I
35144 05/11/93 FLEXI8LC TOOL COMPAN
35145 OS/11/93 GENERAL RENTAL CENTE
35145 05/11/93 GENERAL RENTAL CENTE
35146 05/11/93 GOPHER STATE ONE CAL
35141 05/11/93 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
35147 05/11/93 HARPY'S AUTO SUPPLY
35147 05/11/93 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
35147 05/11/93 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
15147 OS/11/93 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
35147 05/11/93 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
35148 05/11/93 HEkMES/JERRY
35149 OS/11/9) HOGLUND COACH LINES
35150 05/11/93 INDUSTRIAL MAINT. SU
35151 OS/11/93 LIAERTY COMPUTER SUP
35152 05/11/93 MAUS FOODS
35152 05/11/93 MAUS FOODS
35152 05/11/93 MANS FOODS
35IS2 OS/11/93 MAUS FOODS
35152 05/11/93 MAUS FOODS
35153 05/11/93 MINNESOTA PLANNING A
35154 01,/11/93 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO
15155 05/11/13 MONIICELLO OFOILE PP
3b 156 OS/11/4) MONTICELLO PRINTING
/ 35156 05/11/93 14ONTICELLO PRINTING
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Ci
733 NEW WARMING HOUSE 37.50
17 REPAIR CIVIL OEF RADI 101.19
30 SHOP E GAR SUPPLIES 72.64
56 MISC PROF SERV/WATER 42.00
59 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/S( 200.17
64 NEW WARMING HOUSE 76.88
64 SHOP 6 GARAGE MATERIA 178.73
255.61
69 PROF SERV/MATER DEPT 780.04
78 SUPPLIES/MATER DEPT S.31
76 MISC SUPPLIES/SHOP IGAR 5.38
18 MISC SUPPLIES/SEWER 9.74
79 VEH REPAIR PARTS/STREET 2.63
79 OIL/SEWER COLL 25.30
79 MISC SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT 3.94
S2.30
81 L18PARY CLEANING CONT 277.50
483 HEARTLAND EMPRESS P 5.105.12
514 SHOP 6 GARAGE SUPPLIE 139.78
99 COMPUTER PAPER/CITY H 113.42
109 SUPPLIES/REFUSE 12.67
109 ANIMAL CONTROL CLEAN S 42.93
109 WATER SHOP SUPPLIE S )4.27
109 MISC SUPPLIES/CITY MAL 79.11
109 CLEANING SUP/L19RARY 1.50
170.52
360 MEMBERSHIP DUES/PLAN 10.00
195 ANIMAL CONTROL CONT 1.100.00
136 OFFICE SUPPLIEVIL17Y 559.96
1)1 PURCHASE ORDERS/C HALL )?.SO
137 BLD INSPECTION CARDS 39.67
72.25
#Ia
•C
•C
0
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
05/11/93 07:58:50
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
35157 05/11/93 MONTICELLO TIMES
35157 05/11/93 MONTICELLO TIMES
35157 05/11/93 MONTICELLO TIMES
35157 05/11/93 MONTICELLO TIMES
35157 05/11/93 MONTICELLO TIMES
35151 05/11/93 MONTICELLO TIMES
35157 05/11/93 MONTICELLO TIMES
35157 05/11/93 MONTICELLO TIMES
35157 05/11/93 MONTICELLO TIMES
35159 05/11/93 MONTICELLO-BIG LAKE
35159 05/11/93
NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
35159 05/11/93
NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
35159 05/11/93
NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
35159 05/11/93
NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
35159 05/11/93
NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
35159 05/11/93
NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
35159 05/11/93
NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
35159 05/11/93
NATIONAL RLI�MING PAR
35159 05/11/93
NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
35159 05/11/93
NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
35159 05/11/93
NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
35160 05/11/93 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONS
35160 05/11/93 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONS
35161 05/11/93 PREUSSE46 CLEANING S
35181 OS/11/03 PREUSSE'S CLEANING S
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
140 LEGAL PUBLICATIONS 1.111.45
140 PW AO FOR PARKS EMPLYM 29.40
140 BLD INSPECTION INFO 67.20
140 CUSTOM CANOPY LEGAL N 178.16
140 JUNK AMNESTY DAY INFO 355.20
140 WATER FLUSHING INFO 86.40
140 C HILLS III LEGAL NOT 118.80
140 ASSESSMENT NOTICE HEAR 15.25
140 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 382.52
2.344.38
403 TRAINING CLASS/FIRE 0 460.00
144 EQUIP REPAIR DARTS/SEM 11.05
144 VEH REPAIR PARTS/$TREE 74.25
144 SHOP A GARAGE SUPPLIES 18.34
144 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/5TR 27.37
144 MISC PROF SERV/STREETS 28.50
144 MISC STREET SUPPLIES 20.01
144 PARK SUPPLIES 104.95
144 VEH REPAIR PARTS/SEWER 48.49
144 VEH REPAIR PARTS/MATER 49.19
144 MISC WATER SUPPLIES 2.26
144 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/WATE 1.31
384 .32
SSO PROF SERVICES/PLAN 2.460.80
550 PROF SERV/CUSTOM CANO 151.40
2.622.20
173 CLEANING CONTRACT/F HA 50.00
173 CLEANING CONTRACT/C H 400.00
450.00
35152 OS/11/93 WRIGHT COUNTY AUOITO 219 TAX INCREMENT LISTINGS 14.00
�r
.l
Jo
35162
05/11/93
WRIGHT
COUNTY
AUOITO
219
SHERIFFS CONTRACT 21.793.00
95162
05/11/93
WRIGHT
COUNTY
AUOITO
219
A00'L LANDFILL CHG 11.860.14
15162
05/11/93
WRIGHT
COUNTY
AUOITO
219
TAX BOOK LISTING 53.17
35162
OS/11/93
WRIGHT
COUNTY
AUOITO
219
PROF SERV/CUSTOM CANOP 50.00
33.770.31 •(
35163 05/11/93 Y.M.C.A. OF MINNEAPO 224 MAY MONTHLY CONTRACT 625.00
GENERAL CHECKIM6
C
TOTAL 49.275.62
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
05/13/93 15:55:22
4ARRANT DATE VE14DOR
ENERAL CHECKING
35164 05/13/93 EDAM
35165 05/13/93 NORTHERN STATES POWE
35165 05/13/93 NORTHERN STATES POWE
35165 05/13/93 NORTHERN STATES DOME
35165 05/13/93 NORTHERN STATES POWE
35165 05/13/93 NORTHERN STATES DOME
3516, 05/13/93 NORTHERN STATES DOME
35165 05/13/93 NORTHERN STATES POWE
35165 05/13/93 NORTHERN STATES POWE
35165 05/13/93 NORTHERN STATES POWE
35165 05/13/93 NORTHERN STATES POWE
35166 05/13/93 MN DEPART OF NATURAL
35167 05/13/93 MN DEPART OF NATURAL
35168 05/13/93 MOHRMAN/1LOY0
35169 05/17/93 BROCK WHITE
35170 05/ 11/93 C.ENTUkV LABS
35111 05/11/93 COAST TO COAST
350 1 OS/ 11/93 COAST TO COAST
35171 OS/ 11/93 COAST TO COAST
35171 05/17/93 COAST TO COAST
35171 05/11/93 COAST TO COAST
35171 05/17/9) COAST TO COAST
35111 OS/ 11/9) COAST TO COAST
35171 OS/ 11/93 COAST TO COAST
35111 05/ 11/9) COAST TO COAST
35171 OS/ 17/9) COAST TO COAST
35111 OS/ 11/9) COAST TO COAST
35171 06/17/93 COAST TO COAST
35117 05//7/93 (EMCON DISPOSAL. INC
ISM OS/ 11/93 DYNA SYSTEMS
35174 Ob/17/9) EMERGENCY APPARATUS
35115 05/11/9) FEEORITE CONTROLS. I
( 15116 Ob/11/9) FLICKER'S T.V. & APV
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
.90301 PEG FEE/OLLIE 1< 20.00
148 UTILITIES
2,793.47
146 UTILITIES
249.48
148 UTILITIES
4,443.53
148 UTILITIES
261.03CR
148 UTILITIES
7 37. 67
148 UTILITIES
14.65
148 UTILITIES
398.75
146 UTILITIES
221.87
148 UTILITIES
557.47
148 UTILITIES
625.22
9.781.08
118 WATERCRAFT REG
650.00
118 WATERCRAFT TITLE
479.00
.90302 MISC STEEL/SHOP A GAR
260.00
742 NEW WARMING HOUSE
117.99
278 SUPPLIES/PARK DEPT
3 12. 19
3S REPAIR SUPPLIES/FIRE
OP 2.SS
35 SUPPLIES/PARK DEPT
100.67
3S EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/TREE
5.96
35 SUPPLIES/DARK DEPT
8.19
35 CLEANING SUP/L IBRARY
4.04
35 SUPPLIES/SHOP i GARAG 159.39
35 MISC SUPPLIES/ SEWER
20.S5
35 MISC SUP/BLO INSPECTION
7.64
35 OLD REP SUP/PARKS
3.40
35 SUPPLIES/STREET DEPT
19.97
IS SUPPLIES/ANIMAL CONTRO
25.99
35 BLD REPAIRS/SE NIOR CEN 41.2%
399. 29
769 JUNK AMNESTY DAY FE 2,265.00
SO SHOP 9 GARAAE SUPPLIE 284.69
490 VEHICLE REPAIR/FIRE 0 413.93
SS CHEMICALS/WATER OEP 2.564.35
60 COUNCIL MTG TAPES 755.60
*CH
OCH
n
u
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
05/ 13/93 15:55:22
WARRANT DATE VENDOR.
GENERAL CHECKING
35177 05/17/93 L "N" R SERVICES - L
35178 05/17/93 LIBERTY COMPUTER SUP
35179 05/17/93 MIDWEST VISION DISTR
35179 05/17/93 MIDWEST VISION OISTR
35179 05/17/93 MIDWEST VISION DISTR
35179 05/17/93 MIDWEST VISION OISTR
35179 05/17/93 MIDWEST VISION DISTR
35180 05/17/93 OLSON & SONS ELECTRI
35180 05/11/93 OLSON & SONS ELECTRI
35180 05/17/93 OLSON & SONS ELECTRI
35161 05/17/93 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
35181 05/17/93 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
35181 05/17/93 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
1;182 05/17/93 UNITED LABS
35182 05/17/93 UNITED LABS
Disbursement Journal
L. Al AMOUNT CL
103 CITY HALL LOCK REPAIRS 45.00
99 COMPUTER PAPER/C HALL 75.62
279 GLASSES/REIMS BY EMPL 416.00
279 GLASSES/T BOSE 31.00
279 GLASSES/STREET DEPT 198.22
279 GLASSES/PARK DEPT 48.00
279 GLASSES/WATER DEPT 3.00
696.22
160 NEW WARMING HOUSE H 1,279.41
160 WELL REPAIRS/WATER OF, 81.73
160 NEW PHONE/SHOP & GAR 95.76
1,456.90
162 ENG FEES/HART BLV0 653.63
162 MISC ENG FEES 4.255.16
162 ENG FEES/WWTP DIGESTE 603.00
5,511.79
455 SHOP & GARAGE SUPPLIE 437.68
455 PARK SUPPLIES 181.40
599.06
35183 05/17/93 VISION ENERGY 516 STREET SUPPLIES 36.21
GENERAL CHECKING TOTAL 26.223.94
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
LIQUOR PURCHASE
1,052.66 •
1686) 04/29/93 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 800040
05/03/93
11:01:43
Disbursement
Journal
WARRANT
DATE
VENOOk
LIQUOR PURCHASE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
WINE PURCHASE
LIQUOR FUND
2. 329. 16 sc.
16867
04/78/93
LIE FERT TRUCKING
600075
FREIGHT CHARGES
438.84
16863
04/28/93
PHILLIPS & SONS CO/E
800037
WINE PURCHASE
617.92
16863
04/78/93
PHILLIPS & SONS CO/E
800031
LIQUOR PURCHASE
860.74
1.483.66 ►C
16864
04/28/93
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE I
800019
BEER PURCHASE
6.047.70
16864
04/28/93
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE I
800019
MISC ITEMS FOR
RESALE 20.70
168G4
04/78/93
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE I
800019
MISC SUPPLIES
23.64
S. 086.54 �.
16865
04/26/93
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA
800022
LIQUOR PURCHASE
163.69
16865
04/28/93
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA
800022
WINE PURCHASE
1.757.53
1.971 .77 �t1
16866 04/28/93 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 800055 INSURANCE PREMIUM 4.026.00
16867 04/78/93 QUALITY WINE & SPIkI 600040 MISC ITEMS FOR RESALE 58.66
16867 04/28/93 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 800040
LIQUOR PURCHASE
1,052.66 •
1686) 04/29/93 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 800040
WINE PURHCASE
530.88
1,642.20 •L,
16868 04/78/93 TRAVELERS DIRECTORY 800007
ADVERTISING
197.00
16869 04/78/93 PHILLIPS & SONS CO/E 800037
LIQUOR PURCHASE
2. 185.40
16869 04/78/93 PHILLIPS & SONS CO/E 900037
WINE PURCHASE
143.76
2. 329. 16 sc.
16970 04/78/93 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 800027
WINE PURCHASE
418.94
16970 04/28/93 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 900022
LIQUOR PURCHASE
2,984.53
1. 303 .47 scl
16871 04/28/93 BRIGGS. COOPER & COM 900019
LIQUOR PURCHASE
3.910.96
L IQUOR FUND
TOTAL
77. 379.05
C
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
nS/04/93 07:10:50
Disbursement
Journal
WARRANT DATE
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
CL
LIQUOR FUND
16872
05/05/93
BERNICK'S PEPSI COLA
800001
POP PURCHASE
708.10
16813
05/05/93
CITY OF 04ONTICELLO
800003
SEWER AND WATER BILL
98.58
16874
05/05/93
DAY OI:TRIBUTING COM
800010
BEER PURCHASE
161.35
16874
05/05/93
DAY DISTRIBUTING COM
800010
MISC ITEMS FOR RESALE
18.95
180.30
r�,
16875
05/05/93
DIAMOND CLEAR ICE
800148
COOLERS FOR RESALE
65.60
1b876
05/05/93
DICK WHOLESALE CO..
800011
BEER PURCHASE
2.594.45
16876
05/05/93
DICK WHOLESALE CO..
800011
LIQUOR STORE SUPPLIES
J5.1S
2.629.60
*CH
16871
05/05/93
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
800012
BEER PURCHASE
204.00
16877
05/05/9)
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
800012
WINE PURCHASE
337.26
16871
05/05/93
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
800012
MISC ITEMS FOR RESALE
21.68
562.94
►C1
16818
OS/05/93
FLESCH'S PAPER SEKVI
800116
OPERATING SUPPLIES/BA
122.18
'
16819
05/05/93
G ! K SEkVICE
600129
RUG MATS/MTC OF BLD
46.52
16880
OS/OS/93
GRIGGS. COOPER i COM
800018
LIQUOR PURCHASE
3.425.99
16881
05/05/93
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE 1
800019
BEER PURCHASE
9.087.00
16882
05/05/93
HOME JUICE
800136
JUICE FOR RESALE
46.60
16883
05/05/93
IDEA/ ADVERTISING
800128
VESTS
374.19
16994
05/05/9)
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA
600022
LIQUOR PURCHASE
721.10
16884
05/05/93
JOHNSON OROS WHOIESA
900022
WINE PURCHASE
2.287.79
3.008.89
+514
16886
05/05/9)
JUDE CANOV 6 TOBACCO
900021
LIQUOR STORE SUPPLIES
64.80
16995
05/OS/9)
JUDE CANDY 8 TOBACCO
900021
GIGS 6 CIGARS FOR RES
290.60
345.40
►CH
10986
OS/0S/93
MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
900020
UTILITIES
14.09
16097
OS/O6/0)
MONTICELLO OFFICE OR
900031
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10.92
16090
09/05/9)
MONFICEIIO TIMES
600032
ADVERTISING
/5.e0
18699
r
05/06/93
NORTHERN STATES POWE
900015
UTILITIES
900.79
16990
OS/OS/9)
PHILLIPS a SONS CO/E
800031
LIQUOR PURCHASE
815.43
16690
OS/05/9)
PHILLIPS & SOMS CO/E
800037
WINF PURCHASE
1.701.21
2.016.10
404
RRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
05/04/93 07x10:50
Disbursement Journal
WARRANT
OATE
VENDOR.
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT CL.
LIQUOR FUND
16891
05/05/93
QUALITY WINE ! SPIkI
800040
WINE PURCHASE
153.41
16891
05/05/93
QUALITY WINE A SPIRI
800040
MIXES FOR RESALE
119.58
16891
05/05/93
QUALITY WINE 6 SPIkI
800040
LIQUOR PURCHASE
1.189.61
1.661.66 +Cj^
16892
05/05/93
RON'S ICE COMPANY
800041
ICE PURCHASE
113.45
16893
05/05/93
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
800048
BEER PURCHASE
14.230.60
16894
05/05/93
TWIN CITIES FLAG SOU
800049
FLAG REPAIR
37.10
16895
05/05/93
VIKING COCA-COLA BOT
800051
POP PURCHASE
432.)0
16896
05/05/93
WRIGHT WAY SHOPPER
800106
AOVERIISING
86.25
LIQUOR FUND
TOTAL
38.703.12
C
0
L.RC FINAr1CIAL SY'IEM
05/06/93
15:43:04
Digl
�ournat
WAPRANT
UATE
vElj:,-3P
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
c
LIQUOR FUND
16897
05/07/93
BRIDGEWATER TELEPhON
800002
PHONE
CHARGES
95.80
16898
OS/07/93
DAHLHEIMER OISTRIBUT
800009
JUICE
FOR RESALE
12.50
16898
05/07/93
DAHLHEIMER OISTRIBUT
800009
BEER
PURCHASE
15.526.40
16898
05/07/93
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUT
800009
MISC
ITEMS FOR RESALE 21.00
15.559.90
wC�
16899
05/07/93
LIEFERT TRUCKING
800025
FREIGHT
CHARGES
661.91
16900
05/07/93
MINN OEPARTMENT OF R
800006
APRIL
SALES TAX
10.120.18
'
16901
05/07/93
PHILLIPS ! SONS CO/E
800037
WINE
PURCHASE
211.97
16901
05/07/93
PHILLIPS 6 SONS CO/E
600037
LIQUOR
PURCHASE
3.172.94
I
3,384.91
SC1+1
16902
05/07/93
QUALITY WINE A SPIRI
600040
LIQUOR
PURCHASE
1.048.94
16903
05/07/93
RELIABLE CORPORATION
800114
DUST
COVERS/COMPUTER 27.56
1690A
05/07/93
$T. CLOUD RESTAURANT
800046
MISC
SUPPLIES
34.50
16004
05/07/93
ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT
800045
MISC
ITEMS FOR RESALE 136.35
10904
05/07/93
ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT
500046
JUICE
FOR RESALE
53.75
2246.60
SCH
16906
05/07/93
THORPE OISTRIBUTIN4
500048
SEER
PURCHASE
3.000.00
LIQUOR FUND
TOTAL
34.123.80
RRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
05/11/93 07:59:44
Disbursement •Journal
aARRANT
OAT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT C1
L ZQUGR FLING
16906
05/11/93
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL/TO
800062
RETAIL LIQUOR TAX
250.00
16901
05/11/93
GRIGGS. COOPER & COM
800018
LIQUOR PURCHASE
766.74
16907
05/11/93
GRIGGS. COOPER & COM
800018
MINE PURCHASE
237.60
1 .004.34 •C,i
16908
05/11/93
GTE DIRECTORIES SERV
800126
ADVERTISING
32.00
16909
05/11/93
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA
800022
LIQUOR PURCHASE
1.07
16909
05/11/93
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA
800022
VINE PURCHASE
I.ISS.29
1.156.36 •CH
16910
05/11/93
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI
800040
LIQUOR PURCHASE
1.605.15
16911
05/11/93
SUPERIOR PRODUCTS
800046
BEER PUMPS
469.39
16912
05/11/93
V S WEST COMMUNICATI
600093
ADVERTISING
24.60
L IQUOR FUND
TOTAL
4.541 .84
C
0
COUNCIL UPDATE
May 20, 1998
Property tax appeals. (R.W.)
As part of the appeal process, taxpayers are allowed to appeal their market
valuations to the local Board of Reviews, the County Board, and then to Tax Court
if they do not feel they have received satisfaction.
Annually, the County Assessor notifies the City of any property owners within the
community that have petitioned to the Tax Court for market value adjustments. For
your information, the following is a list of the individuals and properties that have
petitioned to the Tax Court for changes in their market values for the 1992 valuation/
taxes payable in the year 199;1. No action is needed by the Council, as this is merely
an informational item for your reference.
Name Property
Carl, Eric, & Dennis Bondhus Lake Tool, Oakwood Ind. Park
Steve Johnson Johnson's Dept. Store
Century 21 Really Building
Al Larson Coast to Coast
Al leech Loch Jewelers
K & 1) Investments Fingerhut Building
Dave Peterson Monticello Ford -Mercury
Harry Beho Hurry's Auto
Don & Warren Smith Monticello Times
Giles I enzmeier lien Franklin
Monticello K.M. Ltd. I'artnership Kmart
COUNCIL UPDATE
May 21, 1993
Creat River Road/Monticello Pathwav & Ileaut iftcation Pruiect. W.O.I
On behalf of the Parks Commission, I am pleased to report that the Minnesota
Department of Transportation has awarded the City $28:1.579 to complete the Great
River Road/Monticello Pathway & lieautification Project. The details regarding the
announcement is attached. As you will see, the competition for the $10 million in
available funds wits fierce. MN/DOT received 177 applications for projects,
representing approximately $70 million in project work. Monticello was one of:14
projects that were selected.
City staff, along with the City Engineer, will he meeting with MNA)OT officials W
establish a time line for project completion. 5tary tuned for further updates.
141
NV
Minnesota
Department of Transportation
Transportation Building
395 John Ireland Boulevard
Qv
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155
May 17, 1993
Jeff O'Neill
City of Monticello
250 East Broadway
Monticello, Minnesota 55362
Re: Great River Road/Monticello Pathway & Beautification Project
Dear Mr. O'Neill:
I I On behalf of the Task Force, 1 am pleased to inform you that your project, noted above, has
been recommend Sd fn. f�«i! FnhaUsmentfunding. A table of all recommended projects in
the three categories (PedestrianMikeway. Historic, and Scenic/Environmental) is attached for
your information.
Thank you for your recent application to the interim solicitation process for federal
Transportation Enhancement projects. The interim Enhancement process was developed by
the Enhancement Task Force, a group of representatives from 13 public organizations. On
behalf of the Task Force, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) solicited
Enhancement projects in February, 1993. MnDOT received 177 applications for projects,
representing approximately $70 million of project work. Using the eligibility and priority
criteria developed by the Enhancement Task Force, the applications were evaluated and
/1 ranked, and 34 projects have been recommended to MnDOT for use of Enhancement funds.
/ MnDOT has concurred with the Task Force recgmrntndgtions.
The Task Force has made some additional recommendations regarding the timing, cost limits
and processing of projects which you should note:
Because the projects selected from the Interim Solicitation are to be open for
the use intended by the end of calendar year 1994, projects should obligate
federal funds consistent with their schedules but no later than
September 1, 1994. The commitment of federal funds to projects based on
selection from this Interim Solicitation terminates on that date.
A. E4"l Opwmwy &*kl
Jeff O'Neill
May 17, 1993
Page 2
2. Federal funds will be limited to the amount identified in the Engineer's
Estimate prepared for bid advertisements, but not to exceed the amount
identified in the project proposal responding to the Enhancement Interim
Solicitation.
3. MnDOT will request, on behalf of Enhancement project proposers, that the
recommended Enhancement projects be added to the 1993-95 and 199496
Transportation Improvement Programs (Tips) for appropriate metropolitan planning
areas and to the statewide TIP. Projects must be included in the metropolitan and
state TIP before federal funds can be obligated.
The MnDOT District State Aid Engineer in your arca is Mike Tardy, telephone
218-828-2475. Please contact this individual immediately to arrange for a meeting to
discuss exactly how to proceed to process your Enhancement project. Because of the
stringent timing requirements of the Enhancement projects, it is imperative that processing
requirements be identified and completed as quickly as possiblc.
Congratulations on the selection of your project for Enhancement funding. We are confident
that these Enhancement projects, selected out of a large field of high-quality projects, will
greatly benefit Minnesota.
Sincerely,
Merr(n L' ,or
Office o9 ighProg;rams
cc: Enhancement Task Force
District Engineers
District State Aid Engineers
RTPCs
PROJECTS RECOMMENDED FOR FUNDING
FEDERAL
PROJECT #
"W- CAW
DESCRWnON
COST
H-22
MN Historical Sodety
Aye, Trading Post Res nation
257334
H-20
MruDOT Golden Valley
Stone Arch Bndge
2.184.000
PB -108
DNR
Willard Munger State Trail
513.1811
PB -103
DNR
Glacial Lakes State Trail
300.000
PB -36
Shoreview City
County Rad l Trail
77350
PB -90
Maple Grove City
E. Fish Lake Road Ped Bridge
295.500
PB -99
Saint Pau! City
Burlington Northern Regional Trailway
593AW
PB -62
Owatonna City
Straight River Corridor
93b00
PB -8
Mille Lacs County
Father HauKpuJKaduo S.P. Bike Trail
261.000
PB -34
Murray County
ShcmklEnd4Lim Pah
0.800
PB -76
Sub. Henn. Reg. Perk Dia
North Misu=ppi Regional Trail
150.000
PB -73
Sub. Henn. Reg. Port Dia
Valley View Road BikNPedestrian Bridge
105.000
PB -100
Dakota County
Dakota Co. Regional Trail Corridor
330.000
PB -96
Fridley City
University Ave. Bike/Ped. Project
60DW
PB -97
Chanhassen City
TH 5 Pad/Bike Bridge
290400
PB -77
Anoka County Parts
E. River RoadC4mdet Bridge Ped/Bikeway
160.000
PB—I1
Chippewa County
Historic Minnesota Valley Trail
72.474
PB -102
DNR
Root River State Trml
157.560
PB—I
MN DNR Parks Q Res.
Bikellliildng Trails Itasai State Parts
220.000
PB -55
Maplewood City
City HmUCo mmumty Center Trail
94AQ
PB -80
Roseville City
County Road C Pathway Enhancentem
300400
PB -25
Mn/DOT Duluth
Alex Laveau Memorial Bike Trail
600.000
PB -5
St. Cloud City
Beaver Wand Trail
100400
PB --60
Monticello City
Monticello Pathway B Bcwtification
283 VN
PB -78
Mn/DOT Detroit I
TH 28 Bikepath—Sta tuck to Glenwood
720.000
PB -2
MN DNR Portes as Rm
Pedemm Trails Gooseberry Falls S.P.
150400
PB -98
Anoka & Ramsey Cities
Constr= Lighting R Facilities for Pub
113244
PB -27
MN DNR Parks as Rec.
Interstate S.P. Trail Dev. R Scenic Berm,
95400
PB -101
Aitkin County
Hill City Intermodal Trail System
549.690
PB -75
Sub. Henn. Reg. Park Dist.
St. Albans Bay Bikeway Bridge
110.950
SE -5
MnlDOT
Prairie R Roadside Enhancement
290400
SE -23
Hennepin County
CSAH 12 —Cloquet Wand Scenic Overlook
75400
SE -26
Chanhasw City
TH 5 Pedescian/Bicycte Bridge
See PB -97
SE -19
Bemdli City
Res Ama/Tourut Information Center
150.000
SE -15
Winona Co. Highway Dept.
Hiawatlu—Appleblossom Scenic Drive
381AM
_ .. ...
_
10.335.091