City Council Agenda Packet 06-28-1993go-,-)
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF T}IE CITY COUNCIL
Monday, June 28, 1993 - 7 p.m.
Mayor: Ken Maus
Council Members: Shirley Anderson, Clint Herhst, Brad Gyle, Patty Olsen
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held June 14, 1993.
3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints.
4. Consideration ofadopting a resolution accepting feasibility report and ordering
plans and specifications --Hart N)ulevard trunk storm sewer outlet.
6. Consideration of approval of plans and specifications for refurbishment or
replacement of the second stage digester cover and authorization to advertise
for hids.
6. Consideration of granting annual approval for municipal licenses.
7. Consideration of establishing fee schedule for reserved use of city park
huildings.
B. Review of Cedar Street road alignment.
9. Consideration of acceptance of 1993 Annual Sidewalk Inspection Report and
modifieat.ion of inspection criteria.
10. Consideration of hills for the month of.lune.
11. Adjournment.
P'-)
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Monday, June 2A, 1993 - 7 p.m.
Mayor: Ken Maus
Council Members: Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brad Fyle, Patty Olsen
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held June 14, 1993.
3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints.
4. Consideration of adopting a resolution accepting feasihilil.y report and ordering
plans and specifications --Hurt 11oulevard trunk storm sewer outlet.
b. Consideration of approval of plans and specifications for refurbishment or
replacement of the second stlige digester cover and authorization to advertise
for bids.
6. Consideration of granting annual approval for municipal licenses.
7. Consideration of establishing fee schedule for reserved use of city park
buildings.
A. Review of Cedar Street road alignment.
9. Consideration of acceptance of 1993 Annual Sidewalk Inspection Report and
modification of inspection criteria.
10. Consideration of hilly for the month of.lune.
11. Adjournment.
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, June 14, 1993 - 7 p.m.
Members Present: Ken Maus. Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brad Fyle. Patty
Olsen
Members Absent: None
Consideration of aooroval of minutes of the regular meeting held Mav 24,
1993.
Brad Fyle noted that he voted in favor of the motion asking the Parks
Commission to review issues relating to the placement of off -premise
advertising signs at the NSI'/City hallftelds.
After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by Shirley
Anderson to approve the meeting minutes as amended. Motion carried
unanimouslv.
Citizens comment.s/oetitions. renuests. and complaints
None forthcoming.
Public Hearing—Consideration of it resolution vacating a uortion of Hart
Boulevard. Petitioner. Monticello -Hie Lake Hosoital District.
Mayor Maus opened the public hearing. Assistant Administrator O'Neill
explained that on May 10, 1993, Council gave conceptual approval of vacating
it 5' x 145' section of Hart Boulevard located directly in front of the existing
clinic and proposed clinic expansion area. The vacated portion of Hart
Boulevard, when added to the clinic site, would enable development of a 24 -ft
wide driving aisle and covered canopy serving the front entrance to the clinic.
City Council was asked to determine what to charge the hospital district for
the vacated land. Brad Fyfe suggested that the City charge the full market
value of the vacated land. O'Neill inrormed Council that at one time the
hospital district was considering selling the property located adjacent to the
existing clinic site. The price of the land tit that time was $42,000, or $.67 per
foot. Perhaps $.67 per square foot should be the market value used to
calculate the value of the vacated property. Ken Maus asked Gary Anderson
if $.67 per square foot is consistent with land values in the area. Gary
Anderson agreed that $.67 per square foot is an accurate figure.
Page I
Council Minutes - (;/14/93
After discussion, it motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by
Clint Herbst to adopt it resolution vacating a portion of Hart Boulevard and
establish the selling price of the vacated land at 5.67 per square foot. ;Motion
carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 93.17.
5. Consideration of accemtine the 1992 Audit Report for the Citv of Monticello.
Rick Borden and Kim Lillehaug ofGruys. Borden. Carlson & Associates, were
present to review the 1992 Audit Report. Borden reported that the City is in
good financial condition, and 1992 saw increases in fund balances in almost all
funds at year-end. He also noted that actual expenditures and revenues for
1993 were very close to the amounts projected in the 1992 budget. In his
report on legal compliance, Rick Borden noted that the City did not have
sufficient pledge collateral during the year but that sufficient collateral was
obtained subsequent to yearend. Borden noted that it collateral deficiency
occurred near the end of the year because of an oversight by a financial
institution and the problem should not occur again.
Kits Lillehaug stated that Rick Wolfsteller has dune it very good job in
investing city funds. The City has received it high rate of return during a
general decline in interest rates. It has meant tens of thousands of dollars for
the City.
After discussion, it motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by Shirley
Anderson to accept the Comprehensive Annual Financial Rep>,rrt for Year
Ended December 31, 1992. %lotion carried unanimously.
Consideration of amendments to the zonine mau of ;)Monticello nrnuosed in
coniunction with develoumentof the Monticello Commerce Center. Annlicant.
Monticello Industrial Park. Inc. AND
Consideration of amendments to the Cit.v of Monticello Comurchcnsive Land
Use Plan. Amendments ore oro used in cnniunction with remiest for zoning
district. Muurdary chunues. Annlicant, Monticello Industrial Park. Inc.
Assistaint, Administrator O'Neill reviewed the rezoning request submitted by
Monticello Industrial Park, Inc. The changes consisted nfconverting a section
of the business campus zone directly north of the school district from its
current business campus designation to 1-1 (light industrial 1 designation. The
proposal also called fur rezoning a 17 -acre section of land at the northwest
quadrmtt of the intersection of Chelsea Road and County Road 1 Is frvun its
current designation as B-2 ;limited business) U) II -3 (highway business). In
addition, it was proposed that the land located directly east of I IS that is
owned by the applicants he rezoned from its present designation of It -PUD
( residential PUD) to it combination of 13-;1 and 13.2.
Page 2
Council Minutes - 6/14/93
Steve Grittman of Northwest Associated Consultants reviewed the proposed
zoning amendment in terms of the Chelsea Corridor Study, which was adopted
in 1992 as an amendment to the City's comprehensive plan for the area.
Grittman summarized his written report by noting that the proposed rezoning
of land within the Chelsea area is being requested to prnvirle a business park
capable of attracting varied types of commercial and industrial uses. While the
concept may be relevant as may the financial and marketability aspects also
be, the proposal does not consider the city as a unified whole but rather
attempts to provide diversity on a small scale in a somewhat segregated
manner.
Grittman emphasized that the Chelsea Corridor Study and associated findings
still remain valid and that the proposed rezoning is not consistent with the
plan for the area as outlined in the Chelsea Corridor Study.
Charles Pfeffer, representing Monticello Commerce Center, Inc., noted that this
particular rezoning request is the first request that has been initiated by the
property owner. All previous rezonings have been initiated by the City.
Pfeffer noted that his group has spent a good deal of time analyzing the site.
They have met with the school district to review the rezoning proposal and
have studied the storm water issues extensively. It was PfefTer's view that the
proposed rezoning would enhance the overall marketability of the property
while at the same time being consistent with the community's hest interest.
Mike Gair, representing Monticello Commerce Center, Inc., provided a detailed
description of the proposal along with a description of recent development
history, and he reviewed laid use decisions that. have been made in the past
seven years. Gair noted that the proposed rezoning would allow development
flexibility while at the same time being consistent with the City's
developmental goals for the area.
Clint Herbst asked the applicant if the Schutt Superintendent agreed with the
proposed rezoning request. Did the Superintendent say it was okay? Mike
Gair stated that the Superintendent has been informed of the request. Gair
stated he did not Itnow if the Superintendent has endorsed the zoning
ordinance amendment progised.
Bret Weiss indicated that Shelly Johnson had expressed his concern regarding
the plan in terms of storm water issues.
Clint Herbst stated that he did not think that the Chelsea Study is Something
we look away from. We want quality businesses in the area north of the
school. A company that wants to be in the BC district is the type of company
we want in the area. He noted, however, that he agreed with the concept of
identifying a strip of 1.1 property adjacent to Fallon Avenue. Brad Fyle stated
that he agrees with Clint Herbst.
Page 3
Council Minutes - 6/14/9:3
Fyle also indicated that the residential PUD areas should remain as
designated. He suggested that in the event a freeway ramp is potentially
developed at the location, the City could look at rezoning at that time.
Shirley Anderson observed thatthe previous City Plronner, in his report to the
City in 1987, said the same thing about development in the area as did the
current City Planner in the Chelsea study. This adds to the credibility of the
Chelsea study.
Ken Maus noted that perhaps the City can consider refining the business
campus requirements at some point in the future. Perhaps simply requiring
that 305E of the land area be retained as green area does not accomplish the
City's goal of assuring a business campus environment.
After discussion, it motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by farad
Fyle to deny the major portion of the rezoning proposal based on issues
identified in the City Planner report and based on the finding that the
proposed amendments to the zoning map are not consistent with the Chelsea
Corridor Studv.
Motion includes allowing the opportunity for light industrial development
fronting along Fallon Avenue a1 it depth J400 feet between the school district
property and a point 300 feet south of Chelsea Road. The motion is to include
the rezoning of this area from RC to I.1 uses. Finally, in the motion staff was
directed to work with the City Planner rind the Planning Commission in
developing potential amendments to the business campus regulations that
would enable the City to achieve the purpose of the business campus district,
which could include it reduction in the green space requirement. Voting in
favor of the motion: Ken Maus, l3rad Fyle, Clint Herbst, Shirley Anderson.
Opposed: fatty Olsen. SEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 239.
8. Consideration of a zoninc ordinance amendment which would allow a nermit.
for rwornot.ional siLmage/hanner for two weeks out of every month or it total of
16S days a near. AND
9. Consideration of a zonine ordinance amendment that would allow for all
annual wrmit, for. of S25 to cover tx rntit.t.inc costs associated with uromotional
sienaee fees. Anuliamt. 9 local husinesses.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that on March 22, 1993, the City
received an application for zoning ordinance amendments its noted. The
applicants include Country Kitchen, Downtown Standard, Holiday Station,
Pump 'N Munch. Tani Thumb, Total Mart. Vance's Amoco, and West Side
Market. Since November of l!N92. City staff, Planning Commission, and the
applicants have been reviewing issues and policies relating to display of
hunners. O'Neill stated that the efforts made by the applicants have not been
Pape 4
Council Minutes - 6/14/93
consistently under the direction or leadership of one or two of its members;
therefore, it has been difficult to develop a compromise position or alternative
strategies for addressing the business owners' needs without granting an
amendment that would allow banners to be displayed 168 days per year versus
the present limit of 20 day,, pPr year
Assistant Administrator O'Neill submitted a letter from Dorothy Ritz of Total
Mart. City Council reviewed the letter.
O'Neill went on to review a summary of the meetings and discussions relating
to the topic. In his review. O'Neill stated that under the zoning ordinance
amendment as proposed by the nine business owners, a business could place
two banners of any size at any location on the property for a period of up to
168 days. Under current law, two banners of any size can he placed on site for
20 days a year. The proposed level of liberalization to the existing rules
regulating banners was not acceptable to the Planning Commission. Planning
Commission based its findings on the report prepared by Steve GritLman.
Grittman's report noted that the City's sign regulations are generally sufficient
and typical of community standards; and as such, he did not recommend
changes. Grittman noted that in the event the City is inclined to grant
additional signage allowances, it was his view that permanent sign increases
are much more preferable than temporarysiknis. O'Neill informed Council that
although a formal motion was not made. the Planning Commission was willing
to increase the number of days allowed from 20 to perhaps 40 days. This
compromise position was not necepLable to the applicants; therefore, the
Planning Commission did not make a formal motion on this amendment.
As an alternative to amending the ordinance to allow banners to be displayed
168 days per year. O'Neill outlined an amendment that would allow banners
and portable signs to be displayed for a maximum period of 40 days per year.
This proposal also amended the process for administering the permit process.
Under this alternative. the ordinance and associated process for administering
the permitting process would be changed to require that the applicants simply
keep a daily log of banner use. From time to time, the Building Inslectar
would slot check individual businesses to make sure they are documenting the
days in which banners and portable signs are displayed. Once a total of 40
days has been used, the business can no longer display banners at the site.
Currently. a separate permit is required for each banner that is displayed.
which results in it significant amount of time and paperwork necessary to
process each permit. The proposed amendment would enable a business owner
to obtain it single annual permit to display banners 40 days per year versus
the current method of requiring it permit for each individual banner.
Page 5
Council Minutes - 6114/93
City Council discussed the issue at length. Ken Maus suggested that a
separate category be established for portahle siens which wnuld allow a longer
duration in which portable signs could be displayed. Maus noted that portable
signs are generally in a good state of repair and do not present the same type
of potential fnr prnhlpmc that. hnnnon rrnatp.
After discussion, a motion was made by Patty Olsen to adopt the proposed
zoning ordinance amendment allowing banners to be displayed 40 days per
year and modify the amendment by including a provision allowing portable
signs to be displayed 80 days per year. Motion died for lack of a second.
After discussion, a motion was made by Patty Olsen and seconded by Shirley
Anderson to allow banners/portable signs to be displayed for a maximum
period of 40 days per calendar year and amend the portable sign permit
administration process by establishing a provision for an annual permit
allowing banners to he displayed 40 days per year. Motion carried
unanimously. SEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2:38.
10. Consideration of authorizine installation of electronic scoreboards at NSP
ballfields alone with the associated vendor and baseball association
aereements.
Rick Wolfsteller reported that at the previous meeting, Roger 1'ribyl,
representing the %Ionticello Baseball Association, requested City Council
approval of installation of a vendor -supplied electronic scoreboard at the
baseball field at the NSP complex. In addition, Pribyl had requested
permission to seek advertising sponsorship to cover the cost of three additional
scoreboards for the remaining three softball fields that would cost
approximately $1,000 each. The proposed concept wits to sell advertising space
to one or two advertisers to cover the $1,000 cost per scoreboard.
Wolfsteller went on to report that the Parks Commission recommended that
the baseball association request (hat the City budget in the parks department
for the installation of the three scoreboards, or the baseball association could
sell two advertising sponsorships per scoreboard as long as the size was
consistent with the scoreboard. Parks Commission went on to recommend that
the City own the scoreboards immediately upon installation and that
maintenance he taken care of by the City.
Clint Herbst asked how much we are slxending on maintaining the fields. John
Simola reported that we're spending about $4.000 a year. Simoln noted that
City expenses are relatively low because we du not drag or prep the field for
games. All we do is mow and water the grays.
Page fi
Council Minutes - 6/14/93
Ken Klaus suggested that Council authorize City staff to design a contract
protecting the hest int,erost of the City and present it to all of the organizations
affected. This would include the baseball association, Viking Coca-Cola, the
City, and the softball association. The softball association should be included
because as a roeditiun of the donation of the scoreboard, it iF required that the
concession facility serve Coca-Cola products only. The softball association is
in charge of the concession facility; therefore, they need to be included in the
agreement.
After discussion, a motion was made to allow the largest scoreboard to he
donated by Viking Coca-Cola and installed at no cost to the City with the MBA
responsible for maintenance either by paying the City to do the maintenance
or by doing the maintenance itself. Notion directs City staff to prepare an
agreement that involves the baseball association, softball association, Viking
Coca-Cola, and the City. Motion carried unanimously.
11. Consideration of authorizine debris removal and site invest.imition of the
former Gille t)roaerty. West Countv Road 75.
Rick Wolfsteller reviewed the status of the Gille property in terms of iLs
present ownership and potential fior redevelopment given the possible soil
contamination present on the property. He noted that the County wants to
work with the City in cleaning up the site and that any costs incurred by the
City to clean the site will be reimbursed to the City in conjunction with the
sale of the land.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by
Clint Herbst to proceed with removal of the remaining debris and tires on the
site at an estimated cost of $1,500, to contract with an environmental firm for
completing it site assessment to determine any possible site contamination,
authorize that three wells be tested for contamination at a cost of
approximately $1,500, and proceed with the sealing up ofthe existing well at
an estimated cost of $1,000 to $:3,000.
Rick Wolfsteller noted that under this motion, should the site testing prove Ut
determine extensive contamination and the City decides not to proceed with
tiny further site cleanup, half of the cost will be reimbursed by the County, and
the remainder could still he assessed against the property. Regardless, the
cost will be assessable to the property and should be reimbursable through any
sale proceeds. Voting in favor of the motion: Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst,
Patty Olsen, Ken Maus. Opposed: Brad Fyle. Brad Fyle agreed that the wells
should he checked. He did not feel that the City should he investing in cleanup
of the site unless we had full control of the property.
Page 7
Council Minutes - 6/14/93
12. Consideration of gambling license renewal --VFW Post 8731.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by
Brad Fyle to accept the summary report identifying where VFW gambling
proceeds are spent and adept a resolution approving the application for
renewal. Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 93.18.
13. Consideration of having tongue and groove paneling nrnfessionally installed in
the new West Bridge Park warming hnuse/restroom building.
John Simola reported that the West Bridge Park building project has gone
quite well. The building is about 80;7, complete. It is expected it will be
completed prior to the 4th of July. Simola requested that the City Council
allow a change order to the project which would allow tongue and groove
paneling to be installed professionally rather than by City staff. Simola noted
that due to our current work load, we would only he able to install the
paneling as time allows during inclimate weather. More than likely, this
would drag the project out well beyond the 4th of -July. In addition, there are
many difficult angles inside the vaulted ceiling in the warming house, and it
would not he a simple task to do a high quality job of cutting and fitting
individual pieces of paneling.
Simola stated that he had previously solicited quotes from various carpenters
for the work. Blonigen Builders quoted the lowest price at $1,501).
Clint Herbst noted that we have well -skilled employees that can do the, work.
Brad Fyle felt that staff did not have the equipment or training to do finish
carpentry work. He noted that use of City staff to complete aspects of this
project that they cannot do efficiently dues not make sense, and we're better
off if we contract it out.
After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded by Patty
Olsen to authorize Blonigen Builders to install the 5 -inch popple tongrue and
groove paneling at a cost of $1,600. Voting in fervor: Ken Maus, Shirley
Anderson, Brad Fyle, Patty Olsen. Opposed: Clint Herhst.
14. Consideration of a twtit.ion for extension of conditional rise permit allowing it
uuhlic works building in it 13ZNI zone. Annlicant, City of Monticello.
John Simola reported that necording to city ordinance, if work permitted under
it conditional use permit has not been completed within one year of grunting
the permit, then it petition for an extension of time in which to complete the
project must be granted by the City Council. Simola noted that the Planning
Commission has reviewed the matter and has recommended approval of a one.
Page 8
Council Minutes - 6/14/93
year extension of the conditional use permit to complete phase I1 based on the
finding that the first phase of the censtructior. ..as done properly and
consistent with the conditional use permit awarded in 1992.
A,_r discussion, a motion was wade by Cliul Herbsi and seconded by Shirley
Anderson to approve a one-year extension to the conditional use permit
allowing the public works facility in a PZM zone. Motion carried unanimously.
15. Other matters.
A. Assistant Administrator O'Neill informed the City Council that Tony
Emmerich, developer of the Oak Ridge plat, has requested that the City
consider waiving or amending its policy which now requires that a
developer provide a letter of credit or other financial guarantee in the
amount of 100% to 1259 of the project cost prior to construction of city
improvements through the private improvement process. O'Neill went
on to outline reasons why the current policy is in place and noted that
numerous other cities require a financial guarantee that assures the
City that utilities will be installed in conjunction with the residential
platting of land. O'Neill also noted that some cities have waived this
requirement based on their view that requiring a letter of credit is not
necessary to assure completion of the project and unduly burdens the
developer.
Brad Fyle indicated the importance of being consistent in our treatment
of developers. Waiving the financial guarantee requirement in this
instance could create an unwanted precedent.
O'Neill stated that he would he gathering additional information nn the
topic for Council review at an upcoming meeting.
There being no further discussion, the meeting was adjourned.
Jeff O'Neill
Assistant Administrator
Page 9
Council Agenda • 6/18/93
Consideration of adopting a resolution accvrpting fensibilit�report end
ordering clans and suecifications--Hart Boulevard trunk storm newer
outlet. GLO.I
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
City Council is asked to consider accepting the feasibility report and ordering
plans and specifications for construction of a storm sewer system designed to
convey water from County Road 75 to the Mississippi River. The alignment
of the storm sewer will follow the parking lot constructed with the proposed
expansion of the Monticello-Ilig Lake Hospital clinic.
On September 2:1, 1991, City Council aulhorized preparation of a feasibility
study. This study and potential storm nater system construction was
authorized for the following reasons:
1. The existing Hart Boulevard storm water outlet. utilizes the
Ikandhus property, which is limited in terms of storm water
carrying capacity.
2. The storm water affecting the existing Hart Houlevaral cullet
continue~ to increase due to continued urhanizalion upstream.
3. Ileavy rainfall, especially rainfall occurring prior to spring thaw,
could result in damage to Hart. Iloulevard and downstream
private property 1Bondhust.
4. Impending expansion of the clinic :at, the location of the Hart.
Iknalevard storm water oullet created an opportunity for
coordinating the private project with the installation ofthe Hart
Boulevard storm sewer oullel.
A major factor shove which spawned the need for the feasihility study wits the
potential addition to the existing clinic site This projecl, first initiated in
September of 1441 , is now very close to heroming it realily; therefore, it is
appropriate atthis lime to hilae the next, step in the development provess,
which is to authorize plans and specifications.
City slofP and the (lily Engineer have met with representatives from the
hospital district to discuss the liming of construction and storm sewer
financing issues. 'Timing of the construction of the storm water system its
outlined in the 1easihility sludy is integrated with the clinic building and
parking lol construction plans. It is expected that the hospital district will he
Council Agenda - 6/28/93
funding u portion of the cost. to construct the city storm water system equal to
the hospiLal district's cost. to construct a system sufficient to serve the parking
area being developed. According to the City Engineer, the hospital district's
ennlribedion will ama n! !o nppn. xiin-00y IIP.- to Iii'.; of the totsl project cost.
Tut,al project cost is estimated al $1711,31111. laity staff is in the process of
preparing options for financing this particular stone sewer improvement_ It
is hoped that the funding formula adopted with this project will be applicable
Ill future storm sewer projects. This potential program for financing storm
water development will likely include establishment of a variety of revenue
sources. It is our Rind to have the program reviewed by Council and in place
in time for the contract award and puhlic hearing for this project scheduled for
August 2:3, 1993.
Council should he aware that authorization to prepare plans and slnecifications
is being requested without any guarantee that the project will actually he
constructed at this time. Although it appears evident that the clinic expansion
will occur, there is no guarantee: and if clinic expansion does not occur, Ole
storm water projectmay not Ie completed, and die City will have spent money
on plans and specifications and have no project, tel show For it. This somewhat
negative faclur is mitigated by the fact that the plans prepared, ifnot.executed
at this time, will still have value and can Iw utilized atsome point. in Ole
fut.ure.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
Motion toadop( a resolution accepting the fcasihilily reportand ordering
plans and specifications for the hart Boulevard storm water outlet.
Under (his alternative, the wheels m -o put in motion to construct the
storm water facility in union with (he development of the clinic addition
and associated parking lot. The next step in the process is to approve
plans :aid specifications and order ads for bids, which is scheduled for
the Council meeting on July 26, 1113. Between now and August 23,
11193, City stun' will he investigating options for financing this major
improvement with an eye toward development of a policy that could he
applied city-wide to address future storm water project's that lire likely
to he completed in the next two to five years. Other storm sewer
projects in the wings include the Meadow Oaks stortn w91(er outlet and
a variety of impnrvetnent.s necessary to convey water from the Chelsea
corridor arca to the Mississippi River.
Council Agenda - 6/28!93
2. Motion to deny adoption ofa resolution accepting the feasibility resort
and ordering plans and specifications for the Hari 11oulevard storm
water outlet.
Under this alternative, City Council is not convinced that it is necessary
to develop a storm water outlet at this time. The hospital district would
be required to manage storm water coming fmm the building and the
parking lot through development of a much smaller private system.
Storm water would continue to be conveyed through the Dondhus
property at an increasing rate, which could possibly result in City
liability for damage to the Ilondhus site.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
It is the view of City staff that the timing is right to construct the storm water
outlet at this location at this time for the following reason. The City has
easement agreements which allows placement of the storm water system
underneath the clinic parking area. Placement of the storm water pipe at this
location makes sense because it utilizes space that is being used for parking.
Placing the outlet at another location could potentially occupy space that could
otherwise have been used for a building. The City would need to purchase
easement rights in order to locate the storm water facility elsewhere. The
timing of the project to coincide with construction of the clinic will result in
cost savings to both the City and the hospital district and will result in the
hospital district paying a significant share of the project cost.
1). SUPPORTING DATA:
Resolution; Copy of feasibility report
RESOLUTION 93-
RESOLUTION
3
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY STUDY
AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLAUNS AND SPECIFICATIONS
HART BOULEVARD STORM SEWER OUTLET
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 91-33 of the Council adopted September 23, 1991,
a report has been prepared by OSM with reference to the Hart Boulevard Storm
Sewer Outlet, and this report was received by the Council on .lune 28, 1993; and
WHEREAS, the engineer's feasibility report indicates that construction of the Hart
Boulevard Storm Sewer Outlet is feasible and that the estimated cost of the
improvement is $148,700; and
WHEREAS, the reasons supporting authorization of preparation of the feasibility
study as noted in Council Resolution 91-33 also supports preparation of plans and
specifications.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA:
City Engineer Bret Weiss of OSM is hereby designated as the engineer for this
improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for making of such
improvement.
Adopted by the Council this 28th day of .lune 1993
Mayor
City Administrator
Li
snow, '
RESOLUTION 91- 33
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF
uecmRnpLEVARD STORM 'EWER O11TT.RT FF.ASTRTI.TT'Y STUDY
WHEREAS, the current Hart Boulevard storm water outlet utilizing
the Bondhus property drainage system is limited In terms of storm
water capacity, and
WHEREAS, the storm water affecting the existing Hart Boulevard
outlet continues to increase due to continuing urbanization
upstream, and
WHEREAS, unusually heavy rainfall especially prior to spring thaw
could result in damage to Hart Boulevard and downstream private
property, and
WHEREAS, impending commercial development at the potential location
of the Hart Boulevard storm water outlet has created an opportunity
for coordinating the private project with the installation of the
Hart Boulevard storm sewer outlet, and
WHEREAS, the City Council of Monticello desires to obtain
Information necessary to develop a strategy for development of an
adequate outlet to the Mississippi River at Hart Boulevard.
LET IT THEREFORE BE RESOLVED that the City of Monticello hereby
authorizes the City Engineer to prepare the Hart Boulevard storm
sewer outlet feasibility study at an estimated cost of $4,300 as
proposed in the City Engineer's letter to the City dated
September 19, 1991.
Adopted this 23rd day of September, 1991.
M or
Q�i lel, c,�.
City Admin , trator
Council Agenda - 6/28/93
Consideration of avoroval of plans and soecificalions for
refurbishment or reulacement of the second stave divester cover and
authorization to advertise forbids. 1.1.5.1
A. REFFRENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The Council authorized preparation of plans and specifications for
refurbishment or replacement of the second stage digester cover on April 26 of
this year. The Citv Engineer, PSG, and City staff" have been working toward
developing it set of plans and specifications that would greatly diminish the
possibility of accelerated corrosion occurring in the future.
Based upon our investigation and tests of the steel, it becomes apparent that
the corrosion occurred from direct contact of the steel with hydrogen sulfide
and oxygen. The following factors contributed to the premature failure of the
digester cover or its accelerated corrosion.
1. The original design of the digester cover was such that maximum
protection of the steel would he difficult to obtain with any coating
system. In addition, the design of the sludge piping system and
methane gas systems did not allow fur enough flexibility for the digester
cover to he operated without it possibility of air or oxygen entering the
digester.
2. The coal -tar epoxy muting un the interior steel of the digester failed
curlier than expected. This failure was most likely due to improper
preparation of the steel prior to coating and less than optimum
application of the coal -tar epoxy.
3. The high sulfur content of the egg waste from Sunny Fresh Foods.
including the added sulfur in the sulfuric acid, increased Ute fornud.iun
of hydrogen sulfide gas inside the digester cover, which accelerated the
corrosion of exposed steel.
4. Doe to at piping support failure inside the second stage digester. I G
operated the digester in such it manner over the luist. three years that
on occasion air or oxygen was introduced into) the digester. This air and
oxygen accelerated the oxidization or rusting of the exposed steel.
Fach one of the above items or conditions by themselves would probably not
have led to the accelerated corrosion without one or inure of filo other
conditions present. The plans and specificittions for the refurhishment of the
existing digester cover ur a new digester cover will take into consideration the
Council Agenda - 6/28/93
operational design of the cover and its corrosion resistance. In addition, the
existing; cover would also be modified to limit the possibility of air or oxygen
being introduced. It will also he necessary, however, to have a separate piping
ntidification project outside of the digester, which would encompass piping and
valve modifications to the sludge lines and quite possibly modif icatiuns to the
methane Ras handling systems Ito he hid separately or partially completed by
PSG I r. These will be necessary to have a broader range of flexibility in
operations to ensure safe use of the methane gas and limit any possibility of
air entering Lite digester. The coatings for the digester cover and internal
piping will remain the same its original, coal -tar epoxy: however, extensive
requirements are included fur the preparation of the steel and the actual
application of the coal -tar epoxy. We will Ix thoroughly inspecting all of the
coating operations to ensure the hest possible coating and protection of the
steel.
Lastly is the concentration of sulfur from Sunny Fresh. As we discussed at am
earlier meeting, Sunny Fresh Foods had ceased operation of thei r sulfuric acid
huffering several months ago and switched to hydrttehloric acid, which greatly
reduced the amount of sulfur in our waste stream and allowed us to cease
operation of our ferric chloride odor control injection. Sunny Fresh has taken
one step further in regard to their pH control and is now under operation using
carbon dioxide gas for pH control. This appears to he working quite well. CO'
is practically the most. inert pH buffering that we know of It. dives, however,
produce it hiproduct called carbolic acid in small quantities, t►»d we will be
researching it In see if this would have tiny effect tat all on our collection
system or wastewater treatment plant.
USM has prepared the plans and slxxificalions liar the new digester cover
around the Knvirex product line, which is one of the hest covers built, and the
firm has kill excellent track record. The cover specified will Ix of the scum
.rubmergenee type with a flat ceiling In protect. till of the truss work.
Contractors may prepare an alternate hid to the Isnvirex cover: however, it
must be ol'similar design and configuration, and USM will lie scrutinizing the
drawings from both Envirex and tiny alternative bids prior to uward. The hid
advertisement., if approved, will he placed in this 'Thursday's paper, and the
consideration of award would he at the .July 26 meeting.
For those of you who have not actually viewed the second stage digester cover,
the courtyard gale tat the waslewatertrealmnil plant will he aspen tit 6:30 on
Monday evening. Hard hats and safety glasses will Ire available, and you will
be able to observe first hand the condition of the digester cover.
Council Agenda - 6/28/93
Due to the bulk of the plans and specifications for this project, they are not
included with your agenda packet. They are available for review at city hall.
Jon Peterson, the project engineer from OSM, will he available at Monday
evenings meeting to answer any questinm von may have ahm i the p1Qnc Pnrj
specifications.
13. ALTERNATIVE. ACTIONS:
The first alternative is to approve the plans and specifications as
presented and authorize advertisement for bids.
2. The second alternative would he to modify the plans and specifications
in a manner as deemed necessary by the Council and advertise for bids.
3. The third alternative is not to advertise for bids but to repair the
digester cover based upon the original proposals we have totaling
approximately $104,000.
4. The fourth alternative is to do nothing.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the City Council
move ahead by approving the plans and specifications as outlined in
alternative #1 or i12.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Corrosion report; Plans and specifications are available at city hall.
6
QUIFe � naa lecarocal Ser aKps
93-0136-67
/ip
A Report on
Analysis of Corrosion Products
from Anaerobic Digester from
Monticello, Alinnesota
Submitted to:
Dan Danko
Env ire: Inc.
1901 South Prairie Avenue
Waukesha, WI 53186
Client Order Number: 059612
RTS' Project Number: 0136-74-01
Report by:
Apolonio M. Ortijuere
Peer Reviev by:
7
Nola P. Andersen
June 3, 1993
INe report my not be twoduced. vicept In lull, wittwut the written approval of aunotd Technical eenAase
Ro■nofd IeCMtCaI SorWes 5101 W Ba4FI Rood nbeaaueoe. IW 53114 CD
93-0136-61
1 .0 SUBJPU
This report covers the results of the analysis of corrosion
products from an anaerobic digester from Monticello. Minnesota.
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF TEST ARIIC
Two bags of corrosion samples were received on 5/21/93. One was
labelled "outside skirt" and the other "inner cover". They were scraped from
a digester that had been in operation for 10 years. Envirex indicated that
this digester was inspected by the owner in the 5th year of operation and
showed no abnormal corrosion. The samples were assigned RTS' serial number
17168.
3.0 WORK SCOPE
Envirex requested an analysis of the corrosion products to
determine the nature and cause of corrosion.
4.0 CONCLUSIONS
4.1 The two most abundant elements in the corrosion
products were iron (Fo) and Sulfur (S). Tho
combination of whitish color and almost 1:1 Fo/S
ratio suggest a sulfide type deposit that doveloped
from hydrogen sulfide.
4.2 Oxygen (0) was abundant in all the corrosion products
and there were glass plus natural fibers and sand in
the inside cover sample. These suggest that a
digester malfunction Influenced the corrosion
failure.
5.0 TEST EQUIPMENT
SEM -EDS - Scanning Electron Microscope
with Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy
Aspen Consulting, Inc. - Brookfield, Wisconsin
0
Em
93.0 136 -0
111
F U PROCEDURE AND RESUL'[5
6.1 Test Procedure
Various colored corrosion residues were removed from both samples
and analyzed with the SEH -EDS. This instrument is equipped with the light -
element detector hence oxygen can be detected. The different colored
residuee analyzed are identified by letters in Figures 1 and 2 (page 5).
6.2 Test Results
Macroexamination indicated that the corrosion products were very
porous and crumbly. There were fibrous material in both samples. Some
fibers were straight similar to fiberglass and others matted, suggesting a
natural fiber. In addition, there were white grains similar to sand in the
inside cover sample.
SEM -EDS analysis of the colored deposits indicated by letters in
Figure 1 shoved the following:
Area A: Major Elements Ca, S, P
Minor Elements Fe, Si, Al, Mg, 0
• Area B: Major Elements Fe
Minor Elements S. P. Si, Ca, Al, 0
• Area C: Major Elements Fe, S
Minor Elements P. 0. Si, Ca
Area D: Major Elements Fe, S
Minor Elements O• Ca, P
• Area E: Major Elements - Fe
Minor Elements P, 0, S, Cl, K
• Area F: Major Elements - Fo
Minor Elements S, 0, Si, P, F
• Vhlts Grains in Inside Cover Sample - S1, 0
6.3 AnALYAiA of RAAultn
The macroexamination and SEM -EDS data indicate the following:
• The corrosion products formed under limited oxygen
supply as indicated by their porous, crumbly nature
and presence of 0.
I
X111
• Corrosion of the inside cover most likely was influenced
by hydrogen sulfide d ... . v,:y&c :.
• The level of the sludge material reached the region where
the inside cover sample was obtained at least once. This
is indicated by the fibers and sand grains occluded in Ll.e
corrosion products.
It is suspected that a malfunction in the digester allowed the
sludge level to rise inside to an excessive height; when the level receded,
a high vacuum was created inside which could not be sustained by the seal
resulting in an air leak. The hydrogen sulfide in the waste gas and oxygen
formed the highly corrosive combination that attacked the steel.
7.0 DISPOSITION OF TEST ARTICLES
Samples will be disposed of in 30 days.
1
31 i )41 iSI 1611� 17I, 1,181 '91'' ' 1
03358.7
Figure 1. Deposit from Outside Skirt '
The tWo piecesrepresent the outside (left) and inside
surfaces of a large deposit scraped off the skirt.
w �•• t
� � r
r
c33see
1 Figure 7 From Inside Cover
The deposits were very porous and crumbly (507
Council Agenda - 6/28/93
A. Consideration of vmntine annual annroval for municinal lieenxea. (R.W.I
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
In the past you have renewed the licenses listed below in a single motion. I
believe that the motion has been a contingent motion such that licenses are
approved depending upon successful completion of the application, approval at the
state level, and submission of proper insurance coverage.
The licenses submitted for your consideration are as follows:
Intoxicating Liuuor. On -sale (fee $3,750)
1. Monticello Liquor, Inc.
2. Silver Fox
3. IoynLr's Lanes
4. Robert Eidsvold DBA Comfort Inn
Intoxicating Liuuor. On -sale. Sundav (fee $2110 --set by Statute)
Renewals
1.
Monticello Liquor, Inc.
2.
Silver Fox
3.
Joyner's lames
4.
VFW Club
5.
American Legion Club
Non-intoxicatine
Malt, On -sale (fee $275)
1.
Rod and Gun
2.
I'i•rra Factory
3.
Country Club
Nun-inloxicutine Molt. Off -sale (fee $75)
Renewals
1.
Monticello Liquor
2.
Maus Funds
3.
River Terrace
4.
Tom Thumb
R.
Holiday Stationstore
Council Agenda - 6/28/93
Wine/3.2 Beer Combination, On -sale (fee $500)
Renewal
L Dino's Deli
Sebuu License (fee $275)
1. Country Club
2. Rod and Gun (steak fry only)
Club Licenses (fee --set by Statute based on membership)
1. VFW --$500
2. Americtm Legion --$500
Gamhline. Temt)orary
1. St. Henry's Fall Festival
2. Rad and Gun Club --Steak Fries in August
A single motion approving these licenses should read similar to, " 1 move that the
following licenses he approved efective.luly 1, 1993."
a SUPI'ORTINC DATA:
Resolutions; tit. Henry's gambling license application; Jaycees gambling license
application.
e
RESOLUTION 93 -
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE
OF GAMBLIAiG LICENSE
WHEREAS, the Church of St. Henry has submitted an application to the City Council
of Monticello for the issuance of a charitable gambling license to conduct gambling
at their facility located in Monticello, and
WHEREAS, upon review of the organization's activities, the Council is not opposed
to the gambling licenses being issued by the State Gambling Control Board, and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL that the Church
of St. Henry's application for license listed above is hereby approved, and the State
Gambling Control Board is authorized to process the applications.
Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of June, 1993.
Mayor
City Administrator
RESOLUTION 93•
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE
Or GAu,MLIING LiCENSE
WHEREAS, the Monticeilodaycees has submitted an application to the City Council
of Monticello for the issuance of a charitable gambling license to conduct gambling
at their facility located in Monticello, and
WHEREAS, upon review of the organization's activities, the Council is not opposed
to the gambling licenses being issued by the State Gambling Control Board, and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL that the
Monticello Jaycees' application for license listed above is hereby approved, and the
State Gambling Control Board is authorized to process the applications.
Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of June, 1993.
Mayor
City Administrator
Minnesota Lawful Gambling I FOR BOARD USE ONLY
tnno CHK—
Application for Authorization for I Nlr DTE
1� �l
Exemption from Lawful Gambling License
Fig in Vie unshaded pomom of this application for axompaon and
.and d in at forest 45 days bar— your gambling -mly br prxsaang
Name and Address of Organization
Omand inn Nam. I r.,,,..ra....w,. lr.,,.. ,...... r.....,,�,,..,..... ...,..
Church of St. Henry 01495_ -- 96019
st ..
501 W. 4th Street Monticello MN a 55562
Chief Et.tWM 0111car Dryl.f.. Plow Nartbw T— Daylane Phw Nu
Fr. William Murtaugh 812 ) 295-2402 Marn Flicker 1614 295-2402
Type of Non-profit Organization
Check the box babes which Indicates your type of organization
❑ Fraternal
I—I Voterene
CARD Roligloua
❑ other non-profit
Gamblinty Site
N— d W wean aamp "tall. pace
Church of St. Henry
Street Car................T.-a
501 W. Fourth Street Monticello
Deals) d activity (tor Nhs. Indicate the oaw or the dawlnef
Types 4l Games
OaaW.l arose Recalpr
Bingo
Rattles
Paddlewheels Q
Tipboards
Puli-labs Q
I declare all information submitted to the
Gambling Control Board is true, accurate,
and complete.
Chock the box that Indicates, your proof of nonprofit
status and attach a copy of the proof to the application,
E) IRS designation BOOK
❑ Grtrcabon of good standing from the Minnesota
socrotary of states office
❑ Anioto of paint nonprofit orgdnlzaow (chaMr)
Siw zipcourry
MN 55762 1 Wright
Financial Report lla MValma Prim
Erp.naee, Irchrmng (IncaWlne Dawlone
Coal of Prim No Proal and ra.h)
i
{ —1. rckky .nowt. panory awOrrwn ria tvctls..a
Lu7 Gambling
ctalulao/. aorw vrnw
A-96019-92
I erose an nwlcuo waorrrallon wemal.d b tin Darreaq Corded
Board a bua, ra 9.1 aril oonpal..
Y ttlatt 11, A1i4"L 6.�11�93
Chief Eeaeulle. Onlo.rg ateratwo r /O.t. iChbf Eraedlr. OMc.Ie tie"—
not.
Local Unit of Government Acknowledgment
:halo W—d a Copy d am .1peC.Ilon tato aopYlllon wl ti. r.vrwa tiY 1M (iantMrq Carrm Oa W .rd MI Gpxrl. M.C1M ]0 dlr. from Iti role d
r.c.bl by Vr Cry d carry. uN.m aw but cod al gor.rtmad peas... r.aoUlon fo 1ptllr�al pates rhe adhray, A caq althat r..omlon mad tr roosa d
ar the OmEbq Camra Board waren DD dry. d the oral. land n baler. Cat" d Irelen da trra 60 dare n wr.dr to autbw the saMry
Cay or carmy Township
Township is
p hale
car of terry rarer s
1 L f L f 0
C]Tower
organized
_ _ _ - - --p
iior / s4snamr. d P.— --gaMo wi—
Cb"IrL n
unorganized'
C3 unincorporated'
TaM
cy�. /ll d/v ,nr f ilrl_rRl•f�
Thio Idrm will be mode available Moil with 025 permit foe and copy of
While - Orpinal
in altornaovo lormal (I e. large proof of nonprofit status to:
Yellow • Board returns to
print, braille) upon request. Gambling Control Board
Organization to complete
1711 W. County Rd. B. Sto. 900 S.
shaded areas
Rosovilb, MN 55113
LG27u
Minnesota Lawful Gambling
IIu2r9t) Application for One -Dap For Board use only
Off -Site Lawful Gambling I Base License p
Organization
,_— :!^-----^^- law,. w..u,.r I Uc..se—It,.r I E—aon Dau
MnnticellD Jaycees I ( 612 ) 295-2107 I !12459 6,130/94
Adorer(. -I - poll off—out ruse,)
P.O. Box 43
Gly Sun Zip -A.
Monticello, MN 55362
Nam of Chrt E..onre Oflkr low— srw) goon. Numbr
William F. Hovre ( 612) 295-4581
Oglsite Information
1. N.m of I—W a _. se.w aamdtrq .a t» MIA
/L10 v1: LL 4 /%d/ Gw V io/o Tic iLL0 ,4r40v ,fja9
2. Ass— -.r boMsson q or to.mrxo sur 1w, taw
I ilei / 1.V. fji„ t S Z.
yeti +-Ti't i L C o este ti...
7. an ana.4i.v.m
.Qti� S 7 T Af
r. Nr rd, orpNmm, mrrs.I o'f..n pamdvq M uWNY year? O rM No If fes. M +au er A.t. or o-7
Oath
1 stfinn that the above informaban is bus and correct
Signatu
r
eat Ct;i - aw On'�«- /jL Date
�
c c(1LX N- t- t ; ,! r r i (c // - —
Local Government Acknowledgernent
t. The city must sign this appsrason it the gambling prornses is Ieratod wthn dry limas.
2. The county AND town•hm must sign this appratlon II fw gambsrq promises is bratad .nHn a township
7. The burl unit of govommenf city, or county) moat past a misoluton epoaM1rally approvuq or donyrng this atopfiradon .
a. A roar of tha local umt at aoyemmmrs meawuean tmorovir.n NII nooHomm mutt be peached E NII nnaknnart_
6. If Vis appucason is domed by tho local unit of govern mesh, it should not bo suhnnod to the Gambling Coneof Board.
Clly or County Tcrmahlp
Gly or county name TownsNp nome
nl ftnnt leclln
Ignaaue I aoraon taco v n, Sgnawro of penal rowwlg appsrJaon
Tltlo. Data rscorvod Tido Dam rocoived
Is M"sh )' _Drgan¢ed _unorganiod _umncorppuod
Attach a copy of the lean for the olf•alts location and a copy
of the approving resolullon horn the foul unh of governmml
Mail IMG application to:
Gambling Control Board
Rosewood Plea Soulh, 3rd Flow
1711 W. County Road B
Roseville, MN 53117
For Board Ulm Only:
Appfuved ❑ Denled ❑
E,Scuft abrler,aer.b"Carnot esrd I.W.
C
Council Agenda - 6%28/93
Consideration _o_f_establishing fee_.-chedule for reserved use of city
-Dark buildings. I,l.S.i
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
We currently have four park buildings or structures which are reserved by the
public on it regular basis throughout the summer months. Last year we had
69 reservations for till buildings. This year we already have 70. We have the
existing warming house building in West Bridge Park which is kept licked
except when it is rented. Also in West Bridge Turk we have it hexagon park
shelter. In Ellison Nark we have the newly constructed lug building and the
gazebo. In the past, the City has not charged it rental fee. We have, however,
charged it $50 reserve fee as it deposit to cover cleaning or damage. Often
there is more than one group or resident wishing to reserve it particular
building on the same date. The $50 deposit ensures the individual the use of
the building un it specific date, and it also keeps individuals front reserving a
building unless they are seriously considering using it. In almost all cases, the
$50 deposit. is returned.
With the construction of the new building in West liridge Park, the City has
a much greater investment than in previous buildings and structures. In
addition, the building will offer more amenities such as the indoor rest.ro nus
in the same building, at separate fund serving area, summer ventilation system,
and winter heating system. The building could he available to the general
public on it rental basis fur till periods except, the skating season, which usually
runs front [tile Novemlter to early February.
City staff has discussed the possibility of charging not only the cleaning and
damage deposit for tit(- use of the new building, hut. it non-refundahle rent un
the new building. 'there will Ile wear and tear on the building find it higher
operational cost when the summer ventilation system is in operation or the
heating fir lights are being used. The building would he available for use by
the general public fiar any times other than the skating season, which runs
front late November to early February.
'there ore various individuals or groups that. do use our building. These vary
from city residents to nun -city residents to non-profit city -based organizations
to commercial enterprises to stale -wide non-profit organizations 'these would
he such things its the Ilike (,'lassies, etc. I, therefore, present the following
proposed fee schedule for the Council's consideral,ion. It should he noted that
the Parks Commission has not discussed this issue. It. had (leen scheduled for
the Inst two agendas at the Parks Commission meetings; however, due to their
Council Agenda - 6/28/93
extensive agenda loud, they were unable to discuss the topic. Since the
building will be completed prior to their next meeting, we have asked the
Council to discuss this issue and have invited I'arks Commission members to
attend the C.euncil ....,,tint.
PROPOSED PARK BUILDING OR STRUCTURE. FEF. SCHEDULE
The following fees are based upon a single day or portion of a day's use.
Cleaning and damage deposit.: $50 for all buildings or structure. for any
individual or group tai be refunded utitan inspectio❑ of lae building by the
City indicating no damage has occurred and the building and immediate
area around the building are clean.
Building rental fees (applied to new warming house onlv):
p -Base rent, city resident or business $ 35
Base rent, nun -resident
$ 75
Base rent,, non-profit, in -city
organization
fee waived
Base rent, oul-of--city profit, 4ir
non-profit organization
$75
Use of heat, winter Benson, all users
$ 11l
The above -proposed fee schedule dues not include tiny rent, for existing
buildings, although this could he changed in the future. Examples of non-
profil, in -city nun -profit organizations would he the Boy Scouts orl;uh Scouts.
Women of Today, ,Jaycees, Lions 1'luh, et.c. These organizations have chapters
or satellite groups in the city.
We currently have a dozen or so individuals reserving the building in Bridge
I'ark. This number is lower than usual due to constriction and storage of
materials in the existing buildi ng. The old conununiIy huilding is expected to
remain this year and into the immediate future and will continue to he rented
free. All those people who have al ready signed up would have the option to
swilch Ua the new building ul the rental fee as approved by the City Council.
It. should he noted also that the heat charge during the winter months of $10
10
I
Council Agenda • 6128/93
per day or a nort.ion thereof is simple to numage, as the heat in the warming
area is controlled by a separate key switch on the wall in the room. This area
will normally not he kept much above freezing.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
I. The first alternative is to adopt a formal fee schedule for reserved use
of the park buildings or structures as outlined above.
2. The second alternative is to adopt a fee schedule as modified by the City
Council.
3. The third alternative is to not adopt a fee schedule and abandon use of
the existing reserve policy.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Puhlic Works Director that the City Council
approve some firm of a fee schedule for use of the park buildings as outlined
in alternatives MI or #2. The current rental of the library is $35 per day or
portion thereof, and there appears to he no problem with individuals paying
that amount to use that room. I've been informed that other communities also
charge to reserve and use various park buildings, although I have not, done a
full investigation or called all the nearby communities to verify the amounts
and conditions of rents.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
p }
None. t 3 SJi,�, , Fat �►. �1 t Al�o ��� r 5-b
lip' ` QPc,cionis 0"o0Id
1�� N
Ir
Council Agenda - 6/2W93
Review of Cedar Street road alienment. (J.O.)
Staff will provide a report at the Council meeting. No supplement is provided
with the agenda packet at this time.
Council Agenda - 6/28/93
Consideration of neceotance of 11513 AnnaP1 Sidewalk Insnection
Report and modification of inspection criteria. 1.1.5.1
REFERFNICE AND RAC:KC HOUNIT
This year's sidewalk inspection revealed no big surprises. The on -grid
sidewalks within the community are in excellent. shape. We have three
possible replacement panels for this summer. The City would he responsible
for the replacement of those panels under our current policy. A couple of the
panels involve a vertical rise or offset more than a quarter of an inch. Our
inspection over the past few years has indicated that, often these panels with
this small of a vertical rise settle down during the middle of the summer and
are not a problem. We would like to amend the existing inspection cause for
repair or replacement to read 1/2 inch rather than 1/4 inch. This would give
the inspector a little more nexibility during his inspections.
The off -grid sidewalks were found to he in good condition with the exception
of the stairway leading to the aparlmenLs at the northwest corner of Walnut
and River Street. The owner replaced the railing a couple of years ago, but the
steps, which consist of hand -placed patio blocks, are in poor condition and
could represent it hazard to the general public. It is recommended that the
City send a letter to the owner and have these steps completely repaired or
replaced.
Since there appear ua he no significant prohlems this ,year, it will not, he
necessary to call for it public hearing unless the one property owner mentioned
above is uncooperative.
A e.opy of the summary of the sidewalk report is included with the agenda
packet. for your review. Due to the length of the relvirl itself, it is available for
your review at city hall.
It. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
The first alternative is to accept the 1993 Annual Sidewalk Inspection
Report, order that it letter he sent to Lite apartment complex with the
stairway prohlem, and amend the sidewalk inspection criteria for
vertical rises from 1/4 inch to 1/2 inch.
2. The second alternative would he as suited above but. not to amend the
sidewalk inspection criteria fin• vertical rises.
W
Council Agenda • 6/2W93
3. The third alternative would be not to accept the sidewalk inspection
report.
C. STAFF RECOMMF.NDATU N
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director and Municipal
Construction Inspector, Tom Bose, that the City Council accept the 1993
Annual Sidewalk Inspection Report and make the changes and send a letter
as outlined in alternative ttl.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the sidewalk inspection report summary for 1993; Copies of the
photographs of the prohlem stairway. A copy of the full report is availahle at
city hall for your review.
14
CITY OF MONTICELLO
SIDEWALK REPORT SUMMARY
6/23/93
The 1993 walk-through inspection of the on -grid sidewalks was
completed 6/3/93 and off -grid sidewalks on 6/21/93.
The general condition of the on -grid sidewalks was very good except
for three isolated panels (see As 13, 14, and 15) which should be
replaced due to cracks or a vertical rise between panels by current
inspection criteria. There are quite a few items where panels
should continue to be monitored. Some of these may require sealing
with an approved caulk.
The off -grid sidewalks are in good condition with the exception of
the steps in the northwest corner of River and Walnut (which need
total rehab or total removal), item i3. There is only one case in
which a maintenance letter has to be sent to trim a tree (item V).
Due to the large number of good walks, only the walks with repair
and maintenance items separated by on -grid and off -grid replacement
and maintenance are listed.
City Council may wish to consider re-evaluating section II.B.1.
Cause for repair or replacement. Some of the items on the 1991
inspection which were over 1/4" had settled back down by the time
of construction in July and August. Council may wish to consider
amending the 1/4" to 3/8" or 1/2" in that there could be some
frost -generated movement in April which would be gone by July.
SIDEWALK REPORT: 6/23/93 Page 5
CjI/
••
•�
,
.�
Y
.' �; ,
.*�..:,-
a
Ni•� `yam16
40
,'---+M
�-
'
f
1W
_ •�V �l M •,•�
I�
CITY OF MONTICELLO
1993 ANNUAL SIDEWALK INSPECTION REPORT
.TUNE 23, 1993
1993 ANNUAL SIDEWALK INSPECTION REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item page
Sidewalk Inspection Criteria 1
Index of Repair Reports 3
Sidewalk Report Summary 5
U
SIDEWALK REPORT: 6/23/93
CITY OF MONTICELLO
SIDEWALK INSPECTION CRITERIA
I. DEFINITION
A pedestrian walkway (either bituminous or concrete) is a
smooth, continuous, horizontal plane generally 4 feet to
5 feet wide, parallel to curb or street driving surface in
both boulevard width and vertical height with a cross -slope of
2% to 4% to promote water drainage. It should be free of
hazards to pedestrians, bicyclists, and snow removal equipment
such as, but not limited to, cracks, settlements, protrusions,
both horizontal and vertical such as heaved panels (whole or
partial), tree limbs, and overhangs. There should be
pedestrian ramps where sidewalk meets curb on all new and
major restoration construction.
II. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MAINTENANCE AND CRITERIA FOR REPAIR OR
REPLACEMENT
A. Recommendations for Maintenance
Drainaqe
Property owners will be encouraged to maintain
drainage from the sidewalk areas and will be
notified when poor drainage is observed during the
annual inspections.
2. Small Cracks and Holes
Such defects larger than 1/4" but less than 3/4"
will be recommended to be sealed or patched using
approved materials. This will increase the
longevity of the sidewalk.
3. Overhanqs and Hazards
Property owners will be asked to correct any
temporary hazards such as signs, mail boxes, tree
branches, or rocks or debris on the sidewalk or In
the path of a pedestrian which could cause a trip,
fall, or head injury.
B. Cause for Repair or Replacement
1. Any vertical sharp rise in a sidewalk panel over
1/4" in height which could cause a person to trip
or could catch maintenance equipment shall bo cause
for replacement of the panel.
SIDEWALK REPORT: 6/23/93 Page 1
2. Any section of a sidewalk which has settled so as
to collect water shall be replaced or repaired by
jacking (when feasible).
3. Any holes exceeding 3/4" in diameter and any cracks
exceeding 3/4" in width and more than 1/4" deep
shall be repaired using approved materials.
4. Any sidewalk pancl having a series of wide cracks
and holes so as to make repairs not practical shall
be replaced.
5. Any sidewalk panels with sharp crowns or heaving
which could cause a trip or fall when the sidewalk
is wet or slippery shall be replaced.
6. Any sidewalk panel that is peeling or spauling so
that loose material is consistently found on the
surface shall be replaced.
Replacement of Sidewalk
Any sidewalk replaced shall conform to standard
specifications for sidewalk construction as
recommended by the City Engineer.
SIDEWALK REPORT: 6/23/93 Page 2
1993 REPAIR REPORTS
Reportw
Page 0
Comments
orr onzo
w1 . . . . .
. . . a
. . . monitor
w2 . . . . .
. . . * . . . . .
. . . maintenance, monitor
m . . . . .
. . . a . . . . .
. . . monitor oonu letter
o« . . . . .
. . . * . . . . .
. . . monitor
o5. . . . .
. . . r . . . . .
. . . monitor
w6. . . . .
. . . r . . . . .
. . . monitor
m . . . . .
^ . . 7 . . . . .
. . . monitor, maintenance
letter
wo . . . . .
. . . / . . . . .
. . . ocm*/ ncv»eztv
wy . . . . .
. . . 7 . . . . .
. . . school property
wm. . . . .
. . . / . . . . .
. . . monitor
mz. . . . .
. . . 7 . . . . .
. . . maintenance
w12 . . . . .
. . . 7 . . . . .
. . . nzi~^^e nr^nartv
ON GRID
ou . . . . .
. . . u . . . . .
. . . nvouiulu repair
ww . . . . .
. . . o . . . . .
. . . possible repair
mo.....
..�u � . . . .
. . . noauiula repair
»
w16 . . . .
. . . . o . . . . .
. . . monitor
wn. . . .
. . . . o . . . . .
. . . monitor
w18. . . .
. . . . o . . . . .
. . . monitor
wm. . . .
. . . . g . . . . .
. . . monitor
mo. . . .
. . . . y . . . . .
. . . monitor
wo. . . .
. . . . y . . . . .
. . . monitor
wza . . . .
. . . . e . . . . .
. . . monitor
wzz . . . .
. . . . y . . . . .
. . . monitor
wz* . . , .
. . . . y . . . . .
, . . mvo/tv,
w«x . . . .
. , . . m . . .
. , . . monitor
wxo . . . .
. . . . m . . .
. . . . monitor
wo . . . .
. . . . 10 . . .
. . . . caulk & monitor
wxo. . . .
. . . . m . . .
. . . . moo/tor
w2e . .. .
* . . * m . . .
. . . . monitor
� w30 . . . .
. . . . m . . .
. . . . monitor
wo. . . .
. , . . u . . .
. . . . monitor
wzz . . . .
. . . . u . . .
. . . . caulk, monitor,
mamto=^n=o xottvc
wo. . . .
. . . . u . . .
. . . . monitor
om. . . .
. . . . u . . .
. . . . monitor
wo. . . .
. . . . o . . .
. . . . monitor
w36 . . . .
. . . . u . . .
. . . . monitor
wsr . . . .
. . . . u . . .
. . . . mvouu,r
w:u . . . .
. . ' . u . . .
. . . ' monitor
' w39 . . . .
. . . . o . . .
. . . . monitor
w^o . . . .
. . . . u . . .
. . . . monitor
wm. . . .
. . . . u . . .
. . . . **oxtvr
' w*2 . . . .
. . . . 13 . . .
. . . . monitor
oIonwALx nsPonr. 6/23/93 ro9v 3
INDEX
1993 REPAIR REPORTS
Report 0 Page # Comments
On GRID
043
13
044
13
045
13
046
13
047
14
048
14
049
14
050
14
051
14
052
14
053
14
054
15
055
15
056
15
057
15
058
15
059
15
060
16
061
16
062
16
063
16
064
16
065 . . . . .
. . . 16
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
caulk 6 monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
SIDEWNLR REPORT: 6/23/93 Pago 4
I
CITY OF MONTICELLO
SIDEWALK REPORT SUK14ARY
6/23/93
The 1993 walk-through inspection of the on -grid sidewalks was
completed 6/3/93 and off -grid sidewalks on 6/21/93.
The general condition of the on -grid sidewalks was very good except
for three isolated panels (see Rs 13, 14, and 15) which should be
replaced due to cracks or a vertical rise between panels by current
inspection criteria. There are quite a few items where panels
should continue to be monitored. Some of these may require sealing
with an approved caulk.
The off -grid sidewalks are in good condition with the exception of
the steps in the northwest corner of River and Walnut (which need
total rehab or total removal), item A3. There is only one case in
which a maintenance letter has to be sent to trim a tree (item V).
Due to the large number of good walks, only the walks with repair
and maintenance items separated by on -grid and off -grid replacement
and maintenance are listed.
City Council may wish to consider re-evaluating section II.B.1.
Cause for repair or replacement. Some of the items on the 1991
inspection which were over 1/4" had settled back down by the time
of construction in July and August. Council may wish to consider
amending the 1/4" to 3/8" or 1/2" in that there could be some
frost -generated movement in April which would be gone by July.
SIDEWALK REPORT: 6/23/93 Page 5
1993 REPORTS
OFF -GRID REMOVAL OR REPAIRS NEEDED:
tl Schoul Pruperty
Pi newood--Broadway
Crack in second panel north of 3rd Street ( 1/8" or less) ,
small vertical rise (1/4" to 3/8") at south edge of lc ng
panel, small cracks and vertical rise ( 1/4" each)
approximately 15 feet north of long panel, crack in 10th panel
south of Broadway (monitor).
i2 River Street (north side)_
Wright --Ramsey
Sidewalk throughout block is below boulevard grade, but there
does not appear to be a drainage problem.
Sidewalk at 525 E. River was removed. Slight vertical rise in
panel east of driveway to 519, cracks in first two panels west
of driveway to 519. Small crack in third panel east of
sidewalk to 515 E. River. Slight vertical roll in third and
fourth panels from tree at 515. Slight vertical roll at joint
between fifth and sixth panels from the same tree (all are
monitor items).
Sidewalk throughout block is below grade, but there does not
appear to be a drainage problem.
13 River Street (north side)
River at Walnut
Steps in northwest corner of the intersection were reported
last year in such disrepair as to be removed. Property owner
has replaced handrail and has done some work on the steps to
right-of-way. A letter should be sent to encourage them to
repair the steps tho rest of the way, or we may still remove
those in the right-of-way. I recommend removal of steps in
right-of-way.
14 Broadway ( north s ido)
Palm- -Now
Heavy spauling on all panels except one at 313 East Broadway.
No sidewalk through driveway to 319 East Broadway. (monitor)
Small vertical rise at joint between fourth and fifth panels
west of New Street (unchanged from 1992).
SIDEWALK REPORT: 6/23/93 Page 6
#5 1992 item #5 repaired.
Hart Boulevard (south side)
Three to four small cracks (1/8" or less) in sidewalk
(monitor).
#6 4th Street (south side)
Locust --Walnut
Two slight vertical rises in walk past church. Continue to
monitor as per 1990 Report #13. No immediate repairs needed.
#7 4th Street (south side)
Pine --Cedar
Cracks listed on 1990 Report #14 will continue to be
monitored. Trae overhang at 118 E. 4th St. Send maintenance
letter.
#8 3rd Street (past Pinewood Elementary)
Spauling in walk at west end of school, heavy spauling from
east entrance walk to crosswalk.
#9 Monticello Hiah School
Spauling in four panels in sidewalk west of school on private
property; separate letter to be sent. Letter sent. Spauling
is the same.
010 1992 item corrected.
011 Walnut Street (west sidel
Broadway --River
Small vertical rise (3/8" or less) just south of property line
of 109 Walnut (monitor).
012 Walnut Street (west side)
3rd Street --4th Street (off -grid, off ROW)
Three cracked panels at 311 Walnut (seal?). Unchanged from
1992.
SIDEWALK REPORT: 6/23/93 Page 7
ON GRID
Replacements
413 Broadway (south side)
Cedar --Palm
1/2" vvrttrnl. rtaa at walk to north door of city hall.
(Replace only if other work is to be done in the area.)
414 3rd Street (north side)
Cedar --Pine
1/2"-3/4" vertical rise on the north side of panel at joint
between first and second panel west of driveway to old fire
barn.
Slight heaving of two panels at back walk to the AV Room.
Continue to monitor.
415 Walnut Street (west side)
Broadway --River
Crack in 6th panel north of exposed aggregate starting to
ravel . Small vertical rise (1/4"-3/8") between 7th and 8th
panels north of exposed aggregate at Broadway.
Maintenance Items (seal and/or monitor)
416 Broadway (north side)
Walnut --Pine
Hairline crack in panel at light pole at 111 West Broadway;
balance of block unchanged from 1992.
417 Walnut Street (east side)
4th Street --3rd Street
Spider web cracked panel 3 panels south of 3rd Street walk.
Unchanged since 1990.
418 Broadway (south side)
Walnut --Pine
Crack in docorativo smooth panel around troo at Dino's Pizza
( caulk) . Unchangod from 1992.
SIDEWALK REPORT: 6/23/93 Page 8
919 Broadway (south side)
Pine--Cedar
Spauling at driveway to old water tower. Not changed from
last year (monitor). Slight (1/4" or less) settlement of
exposed aggregate panels for approximately 2/3 of block
(monitor), some cracking and crumbling at joints on decorative
smooth panels just west of driveway (mnnitnr).
Lateral crack east of driveway (0"-1/8") (monitor). Crack in
exposed aggregate and decorative smooth panels at NE corner of
Shelly's Cafe (caulk).
920 Broadway (north side)
Walnut--Locust
Crack in smooth panel 15 feet west of mini mall (caulk).
Crack in panel at walk to 243 W. Broadway, which had been
caulked, has reopened. Crack in panel between doors to Mini
Mall. Continue to monitor.
921 Broadway (south side)
Palm--New
Cracks in 7th and 8th panels from Palm and at 201 New Street.
Unchanged from 1991 (monitor).
922 Broadway (south sidel
New--Wright
Slight settlements in walk at 424 and 426 not changed since
1990 Reoort 949. Maintenance Item; regrade boulevard to
maintain drainage. Unchanged from 1991.
123 Broadway (south side)
Wright--Ramsey
Slight spauling on the two panels replaced at 512 E. Broadway.
Spauled panel at 530 E. Broadway. Not fixed from 1990
construction project. Crack in 2nd panel from Ramsey (seal).
124 Broadway (south side)
Ramsey--Hennepin
3/8" or less vertical rico at west edge of driveway to 618 E.
Broadway (monitor). Unchanged from 1992.
SIDEWALK REPORT: 6/23/93 Page 9
i25 Broadway (south side)
Washington --Past High School
Crack in pedestrian ramp at Washington (monitor). Slight
spauling in first panel east of pedestrian ramp (monitor)
126 Broadway (south side)
Linn -Locust
Crack in pedestrian ramp at Linn 0-1/8" gap, no appreciable
settling (caulk).
342 W. Broadway tree needs trimming S.I.C. II.A.3., no change
in cracks in driveway. Crack following ground fault 50 feet
west of Locust (monitor).
127 Broadway ( north side)
Palm --Cedar
Cracked panel east of boulevard walk at Lindquist Funeral Home
and slight pop -out in 7th panel east of driveway to funeral
home. Unchanged from 1992.
128 Broadway ( north side)
Locust --Linn
Small lateral cracks in 5th, 6th, and 7th panels from Locust;
cross panel crack in 7th panel. No change from 1991
(monitor).
129 Broadway (north side)
Maple --Linn
Spauling to the point of exposed aggregate at Trinity Lutheran
Church. Church may want to consider total replacement in the
not -too -distant future. (Going easy on salt during winter
will extend life.) No change from 1991.
130 Broadway (north side)
Maple --Minnesota
Sidewalk below boulevard and trapping sand and water at 531 W.
Broadway driveway to beginning of new repairs approximately
16 feet west of walk to 541 W. Broadway (check drainage as por
S.I.C. II.A.1.). Cracks in 3rd, 7th, 16th and 18th panels
east of Minnesota Street (monitor).
SIDEWALK REPORT: 6/23/93 Page 10
031 Pine Street (Hwv 25) (west side)
River Street --Bridge
1/2"-3/4" gap between curb and sidewalk one panel north of
pedestrian ramp and along pedestrian ramp in NW corner of
River and Pine.
Crack with small settlement in NE corner of exposed aggregate
(less than 1 sq ft, monitor). No change from 1992.
032 Pine Street (Hwy 25) (west side)
River --Broadway
Diagonal crack from hand hole to back of curb south of alley.
No settlement (monitor).
"No parking on sidewalk" sign bent and hanging over sidewalk
at Century 21. Send maintenance letter to Century 21.
Unchanged from 1992.
033 Pine Street (Hwy 25) (west side)
3rd Street --4th Street
Small cracks in NW and SW corners of pedestrian ramp at 4th
St. --no settlement (monitor). No change from 1992.
5th Street --6th Street
Exposed aggregate panel settled 3/8"-1/2" at curb at
pedestrian ramp at 5th and Pine. No cracks (monitor).
Slight crack in replaced pedestrian ramp at 6th and Pine. No
change from 1992.
034 Pine Street (Hwy 25) (west side)
6th Street --7th Street
Crack in panel at curb between pedestrian ramps --no settlement
(monitor). No changa from 1992.
SIDEWALK REPORT: 6/23/93 Page 11
435 Pine Street (Hwv 251 (west side)
7th Street --Oakwood
Minor settlement on pedestrian ramp north of mall entrance.
Crack in island in mall driveway. 1/2" gap between back edge
of sidewalk and concrete embankment at Country Kitchen.
Cracked panel 22 panels south of pedestrian ramp at mall
entrance. Crack In 23rd panel north of pedestrian ramp at
freeway entrance. Crack in 1st panel south of pedestrian ramp
at freeway exit. Crack in exposed aggregate at pedestrian
ramp in NW corner of Oakwood and Highway 25 --crack due to
control joint in curb. (There doesn't appear to be any
settlement in any of these items --they should all continue to
be monitored.)
#36 Pine Street (Hwy 25) (east side)
6th Street --4th Street
Small vertical rise at is t panel from pedestrian ramp at 6th
and Pine. Unchanged from 1991 (continue to monitor). Slight
roll of 11th and 12th panels north of 6th St. causing 3/8" or
less vertical rises on opposite edges of walk (monitor).
037 Maple Street (west side)
I
Broadway --3rd Street
Minor crack in panel north of Fyle's driveway (monitor).
i38 Maple Street (west side)
3rd Street --4th Street
Small vertical rise at 13th panel north of 4th Street and
cracked panel in the SE corner of walk at pedestrian ramp at
4th and Maple (unchanged from 1991, continue to monitor).
139 Maple Street (west side)
RR tracks --6th Street
Cracking and flaking just south of driveway to 503 Maple. No
change from 1992.
140 6th Street
Maple --Minnesota
Crack and settlement of wing on pedestrian ramp at 6th and
Minnesota. Small crack in panel in driveway to 503 West 6th
St. (monitor).
SIDEWALK REPORT: 6/23/93 Page 12
441 Minnesota Street (east side)
6th Street --7th Street
Cracked edge at hydrant valve west of Ridgeway Apartments (not
bad enough to justify panel replacement). $moll vaiLlcal rise
(1/4" or less) between first and second panels north of
hydrant at DuBay's (monitor).
442 7th Street
Minnesota --Locust
Crack and slight flaking at expansion joint between 14th 6
15th panels east of Kmart middle driveway (monitor).
Backslope could use some black dirt and seed at east end of
retaining wall. No change from 1992.
443 Walnut Street (east side)
6th Street --7th Street
Crack in pedestrian ramp at 6th Street. Crack (1/8" or less,
one small pop out) in 7th panel north of 7th St., some surface
deterioration and popouts on 14th, 15th, 16th, and 17th panels
north of 7th St. (monitor).
444 Walnut Street (east side)
4th --Railroad tracks
Cracks in pedestrian ramp, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th panels north of
library. No change from 1992. One small crack in sidewalk at
light south of library driveway (monitor).
445 Walnut (east side)
3rd Street --4th Street
Cracks have not gotten any worse from 1990 Report 461;
continue to monitor.
446 Walnut (west side)
Broadway --3rd Street
Small (2'x2') panel flaking approximately 6" x 12" possible to
epoxy patch (unchanged from 1991). Small crack in Ist panel
south of walk to law office (monitor).
SIDEWALK REPORT: 6/23/93 Page 13
I
047 Locust Street (east side)
Broadway --River
Crack in 14th panel south of driveway (caulk and monitor)
Othcr cracks unchanged from 1991.
048 Locust Street (west side)
Broadway --River
Cracks north of driveway unchanged from 1991.
049 3rd Street (south side)
Walnut --Pine
Cracks and slight settlement at Ben Franklin/Security
Financial property corner; continue to monitor. Slight
spauling in second panel west and first four panels east of
Ben Franklin driveway.
050 Cedar Street (west side)
3rd Street --4th Street
Small crack 1/16" or less just south of driveway to 125 E. 4th
St. (monitor).
051 3rd Street (north side)
Walnut --Pine
Cracks have not changed from 1990 Report 133.
052 Cedar Street (east side)
4th --Railroad tracks
Panels continuing to spcul--5th through 10th panels south of
4th Street are the worst. Continue to monitor. May be an
item for future repairs.
053 Cedar Street (west side)
Broadway --3rd Street
Crack in 22nd panel from Broadway (caulk 6 monitor(.
SIDEWALK REPORT: 6/23/93 Pago 14
954 4th Street (north side)
Pine --Cedar
Cracked panels unchanged from 1991. Slight settlement but
home owner would not sign the waiver 1—t veAr fnr 1-nAnel
replacement. Hairline crack in panel at water service to 125
E. 4th St. (continue to monitor).
955 3rd Street
Elm Street --Pinewood Elementary School
Crack in 4th panel from Elm Street and crack in panel at east
property line of Elementary School (no change from 1991).
Continue to monitor. Chunk knocked out of curb back across
from centerline of Chestnut right-of-way. Top of curb is
broken on west radius of east school driveway. 1/2" to 3/4"
settlement of sidewalk at curb on east side of second driveway
(private property).
956 3rd Street (south side)
Pine --Cedar
Crack (1/8" or less) in 3rd panel west of Bridge Water's
driveway (monitor).
957 Broadway (south side)
West of Chestnut
Small vertical rise (1/4" or less) on south side of panel at
driveway to 906 W. Broadway (monitor).
958 Broadway (south side)
Walnut --Locust
Some spauling in smooth panel just east of driveway to
Standard station, slight spauling and some hairline cracks
around tree at Locust (monitor).
959 Walnut Street (east side)
Broadway --3rd
Cracks at Dino's back door unchanged from 1992. Slight
settlement of exposed aggregate panel at north radius of alley
(monitor).
SIDEWALK REPORT: 6/23/93 Page 15
#60 Pine Street (Highway 25) (east side)
River St. --Bridge
Slight settlement ( 1/4" to 3/8") of pedestrian ramp at curb
( mcnitcr) .
061 Pine Street (east side)
River St. --Broadway
Concrete over trench (back of curb) for signal light loop
seems to have settled 3/8" to 1/2" (monitor)
#62 Pine Street (east side)
Broadway --3rd
Slight gapping beginning between exposed aggregate and smooth
panels from 202 Pine to alley. Crack (1/8" or less) at hand
hole for signal light (monitor).
063 Pine Street (east side)
7th St. --Oakwood
Slight vertical rise at pedestrian ramp on north side of
eastbound freeway entrance. Slight settlement of exposed
aggregate panel of pedestrian ramp south of freeway exit ramp.
Crack (1/8" or less) across sidewalk at hand hole at freeway
right-of-way. Crack (1/8" or less) across sidewalk at hand
hole 27 panols south of 7th St.
064 7th Street (north side)
Pine --Cedar
Patches in second and third panels east of Pine have not
changed from 1992. Small hairline crack at second joint west
of sign set on back of walk. (Monitor, possible epoxy patch
needed In the future,)
065 Cedar Street (east side)
6th --Railroad tracks
Crack approximately 1/8" wide with slight edge deterioration
three panels north of storm trench (seal? and monitor).
SIDEWALK REPORT: 6/23/93 Page 16
BRC FINANCIAL SYi.TEM
( 05/20/93 15:10:19
L WARRANT DATE VENDOR
1,tNcRAL k,Htk.K iNG
35184 05/21/93 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF
35184 05/21133 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF
35184 05/21/93 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIF
35185 05/21/93 HAVES/WILMA
35185 05/21/93 HAYES/WILMA
35186 05/21/93 STATE OF MINNESOTA
35187 05/21/93 KRAMER/DEBORAH
35188 05/21/03 KRAMEk/DEBORAH
35189 05/21/93 MN DEPART OF NATURAL
35190 05/21/93 MN DEPART OF NATURAL
35191 05/71/93 ANDERSON a ASSOCIATE
35192 05/21/93 EPL MBL
35193 05/71/93 FRONTLINE PLUS FIRE
35193 05/21/93 FRONTLINE PLUS FIRE
35193 05/21/93 FRONTLINE PLUS FIRE
35194 05/21/91 GLASS NUT/TME
)S19S 05/21/9) MATCH -PETERSON SALES
x5196 06/21/93 J M OIL CUMPANY
35197 OS/21/93 M • P TRANSPORT. INC
05188 05/21/93 MARCO BUSINESS PRODU
3S199 OS/21/93 MIDWAY INDUSTRIAL SU
15700 05/21/83 MONTICELLO PAPER A S
35200 05/21/93 MONTICELLO PAPER B S
35201 OS/21/93 MTI OISSTRIBUTING CO
' 0570? 06/71/9) O.E.I. SUSINESS FORM
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLA
174 KEITH TRIPPE INS PREM 46.91
174 CITY SHARE IHS PREM 381.35
174 CITY SHARE INS PREM $01.32
929.59 •CWF
285 INFO CENTER SALARY 48.88
28S INFO CENTER SALARY 14.38CR
34.50 •CHF
481 MOTOR VEH STICKER LOST 10.62
.90216 77H ST PROPERTY PORCH 341.50
.90218 7TH ST PROPERTY P 170.000.00
11P WATERCRAFT k ATV RE 1.354.00
118 WATERCRAFT TITLE 539.00
10 PAINT/STREETS DEPT 781.75 i/
.00246 PROF SERVICES/WATER 40.00
510 BROOMS/FIRE DEPT 252.80
S10 GLOVES/FIRE DEPT 156.S1
510 N072LE/FIRE DEPT 303.09
712.40
66 MTC OF VEHICLES 16.00
94 SHOVELS/MATER DEPT 25.03
95 OIL/FIRE DEPT 16.00
266 JUNK AMNESTY DAY FEES $0.00
108 MTC AGRMT/TYPEWRITER 175.00
114 EQUIP REPAIRS/STREETS 148.04
124 COMPUTER ►APER/CITY HA 69.77
724 CITY HALL SUPPLIES 38.26
100.53
209 VEHICLE REPAIRS/PARKS 96.OS
169 COPY MCH PAPER/CITY H 174.76
*CH
OCH
ERC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
05/20/93
15:10:19
r
LWARRANT
OAT VENDOR
4ENERAL Lntt xir4u
35203
05/21/93 P b H WAREHOUSE SALE
39204
U6/1%)d! $HUMAN/CATHV
35205
05/21/93 SOLIDIFICATION, INC.
35206
05/21/93 WATER PROPUC TS COMPA
35207
05/21/93 WOLFSTEL LER/RICHARD
GENERAL CHECKING
Disbursement Journal
1
DESCPIPTION AMOUNT CL J
271 SUPPLIES/PARKS DEPT 1.115.67
181 MILEAGE EXPENSE 5.00
633 SEWER INSPECTION TELE 807.50
216 MISC SUPPLIE5/WATER 0 101.90
217 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 716.08
TOTAL 127.750.50
0
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
06/01/93 12:05:12
(/MARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
35098 05/28/93 VOSS ELECTRIC SUPPLY
35098 O5/28/93 VO55 Fi.ECTi!C SUPPLJ
35098 05/28/93 VOSS ELECTRIC SUPPLY
35098 05/28/93 VOSS ELECTRIC SUPPLY
35206 05/28/93 WATCRP90 SUPPLIES CO
35206 05/28/93 WATER PRODUCTS COMPA
35209 05/28/93 MINNESOTA HOMEIIARO 6
35209 05/28/93 MON710ELLO ANIMAL CO
35210 OS/29/93 U.S. POSTMASTER
3S?11 05/78/93 D 9 K REFUSE RECYCLI
35212 05/28/93 RELIABLE CORPORATION
35713 05/28/93 MN DEPA4T OF NATURAL
352/6 05/28/9) MN DEPART OF NATURAL
31,215 05/28/93 U.S. POSTMASTER
GENERAL C14FCKIMG
C
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT CLA
409
CORRECT COOING
1
499.96CR
40$
CORPiCt Ciro ING
14.L6 r
409
COPRECT COOING
24.28CR
409
CORRECT COOING
499.96
0.00 "CMt
610
CORRECT VENDOR
101.90
216
CORRECT VENOOR
101.90CR
0.00 •CHt
104
ANIMAL ADOPTIONS
980.00
195
ANIMAL ADOPTIONS
352.00
210
POSTAGE
1.500.00
611
MAY RECYCLING CONTR
2.262.20
119
STATIC MAT/CITY HALL
23.69
,
119
WATERCRAFT TITLE
604.00
119
WATERCRAFT R ATV REO
613.00
210
NEWSLETTER MAILINGS
292.15
TOTAL
9.391.03
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
06/02/93
17:35:41
Disbursement
Journal
WARRANT
DATE
VENOOR
OE SCRIPTION
AMOUNT
CLP
GENERAL
CHECKING
35216
06/07/93
AMERICAN HUMANE ASSO
.90303
REG FEE/ANIMAL CONTRO
150.00
35217
06/02/93
HAYES/WILMA
285
INFO CENTER SALARY
78.63
35217
06/02/93
HAYES/WILMA
785
INFO CENTER SALARY
73.13CR
55.50
►CHI
35718
06/02/93
NORTHWEST MINNES07A
156
REG FEE/GARY ANDERSON
10.00
35219
06/02/93
LUKACH/JOHN
327
MILEAGE EXPENSE
87.73
35?19
06/02/93
LUKACH/JOHN
327
MILEAGE EXPENSE
29.74
35219
08/02/93
LUKACH/JOHN
327
MILEAGE EXPENSE
29.24
35219
06/02/93
LUKACH/JOHN
327
MILEAGE EXPENSE
29.24
175.45
*CHI
35270
06/07/93
D 6 K REFUSE RECYCLI
611
RECYCLING CONTRACT 2.337.15
35221
06/05/93
AEI; - ENGINEERS 6 DE
745
PROF SERVICES/MATER
300.00
35?27
06/05/93
ANIMAL CARE EGUIPMEN
722
ANIMAL CONTROL SUPPLI
149.00
•
35223
06/05/93
ARA CORY REFRESHMENT
409
CITY HALL SUPPLIES
63.00
35724
Ob/Ob/93
ARMA INTERNAIIONAL
52b
MEMSERSHIP DUES/C NAL
150.00
35225
06/05/93
BARBER ELECTRIC SUPP
746
WEST BRIDGE PARK CO 1.568.16
35228
06/05/93
BEN FRANKLIN
?0
SUPPLIES/P M IMSPECT10
14.54
35227
06/05/93
ROSE/TOM
336
REIMS/PICTURES DEVEL OPE 9.09
35728
06/05/93
BUSINESS RECORDS COR
27
CHECK REGISTER FORMS
?21.71
3S27S
06/05/93
BUSINESS RECORDS COR
21
UTILITY BILLING FORMS
$39.39
35778
Ob/05/99
BUSINESS RECORDS COR
27
UTILITY BILLING FORMS
$39.39
1,300.55
•C14
35279
06/05/93
CELLULAR ONE
bbb
CIVIL DEFENSE PHONE CH
70.29
35230
06/05/93
D • 0 BUS SERVICE
144
CIVIL DEFENSE PROF SE
210.00
35731
06/05/99
DAVIS WATER EAUIPMEN
290
WATER DEPT SUPPLIES
b64.39
35232
06/03/93
ECM PUBLISHERS. INC.
619
DEP REG WHELP WANTED
39.10
35733
06/05/93
HENRY / ASSOCIATES
545
CHLORINE REPAIR KIT 1.695.75
35234
06/05/93
HERMES/JERRY
61
LIBRARY CLEANING CONT
721.50
r
L 45735
06/05/99
HOGLUND COACH LIMES
413
HEARTLAND EKPRESS C 4.714.47
FRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
06/02/93 17:35:41
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
35?36 06/05/93 HOGLUND TRANSPORTATI
35237 06/05/93 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFIC
35738 06/05/93 HOLMES & GRAVEN
35239 06/05/93 KEN ANDERSON TRUCKIN
35240 06/05/93 L "N" R SERVICES - L
33240 06/05/93 L "N" R SERVICES - L
35241 06/05/93 LIBERTY COMPUTER SUP
35242 06/05/93 LITTLE MOUNTAIN ELEC
35243 06/05/93 MN 36/400 USER GROUP
35244 06/05/93 MONIICELLO ANIMAL CO
35245 06/05/93 MONTICELLO SENIOR CI
35146 06/05/93 PHOTO I
35241 06/05/93 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
35248 06/05/93 RELIABLE CORPORATION
35246 06/05/93 RELIABLE CORPORATION
35249 06/05/93 TIPPECANOE PRESS INC
35249 06/05/93 TIPPECANOE PRESS INC
35750 06/05/93 UNOCAL
35251 06/OS/93 WRIGHT COUNTY JOURNA
35252 06/05/93 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP
GENERAL CHECKING
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CL
84 CIVIL DEF PROF F.ERVIC 925.00
85 GAS/FIRE DEPT 186.29
86 LEGAL FEES/CUSTOM CAN 930.34
691 PROF SERV/ANIMAL CONTR 63.90
103 KEYS -NEW WARMING HOUJ 434.83
103 KEYS & MTC/FIRE HALL 80.15
514.98 PCH
99 TONER/COMPUTER/CITY H ?01.29
101 CABLE/P M PHONE 265.66
300 MEMBERSHIP DUES/C SHUM 10.410
185 ANIMAL CONTROL CONT 1.100.00 •
139 JUNE MONTHLY CONTRI 2.833.33
743 PHOTOS - CITY NEWSLETT 10.00
175 WWTP CONTRACT PVMT 30.4?1.58
179 OFFICE SUP/COMPUTER 13.80
179 MISC SUP/COMPUTER 11.98
41.78 •�I
513 BINDERS/MATER DEPT 130.37
513 6INDERS/SEWER COLL 130.36
260.73 MCI
213 GAS/FIRE DEPI 78.71
733 DEP REG AO/HELP WANTED 47.52
$12 UTILITIES 8.69
TOTAL 51.746.18
BFC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
06/08/93 17:06:5?
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
35220 06/07/93 0 & K REF USE RECYCL I
35250 06/07/93 UNOCAL
35253 06/07/93 MN DEPART OF NATURAL
35254 06/07/93 MN DEPART OF NATURAL
35755 06/08/93 AMCON BLOCK 6 PRECAS
35?56 06/08/93 AME GROUP
35256 06/08/93 AME GROUP
35757 06/08/93 BIFFS, INC.
35258 06/08/93 BRIDGEWATER TE1. EPHON
35?58 Ou/08/93 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
35258 05/08/93 BRIOGEWATER TELEPHON
315758 06/08/93 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
r 35258 06/08/93 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
35258 06/08/93 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
35258 08/08/93 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
35758 06/08/93 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
35258 08/08/93 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
35?58 06/08/93 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
15259 06/08/93 C J BROWN BUSINESS S
35260 06/08/93 COPY OUPLCATING PROD
35761 06/06/93 CRAGUN'S CONFERENCE
35267 06/06/93 D A K REFUSE RECYCLI
35253 06/08/93 FEEORITE CONTROLS. I
35264 06/06/91 HOGLUNO/PAUL
a57G5 06/06/93 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
15765 06/06/93 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
35265 06/08/93 MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
35265 06/06/9) MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
35765 06/06/9) MIDWEST GAS COMPANY
. (
15766 06/06/9) MINNESOTA BUILDING 0
Di sbursement alournal
OE$CRIPTION AMOUNT CLI
611 CHECK VOIDED 2.332.1 SCR
213 CHECK VOIDED 26.21CR
118 WATERCRAFT TITLE 4°7.00
118 WATERCRAFTSNOW/ATV RE 645.00
738 NEW WARMING HOUSE 2.751,33
S NEW WARMING HOUSE 1.034.91
8 PARK SUPPLIES 567.63
1.602.54
395 LATRINE RENTAL 70.78
?4 TELEPHONE CHARGES 670.91
24 TELEPHONE CHARGES 90.7•
24 TELEPHONE CHARGES 45.92
24 TELEPHONE CHARGES 79.00
74 TELEPHONE CHARGES 92.83
24 TELEPHONE CHARGES 705.01
24 TELEPHONE CHARGES 13.50
24 TELEPHONE CHARGES 109.2b
24 TELEPHONE CHARGES 31.34
24 TELEPHONE CHARGES 27.79
1,) 11.)9
591 CITY NEWSLETTER PRI 1.6310.63
41 COPY MCH MTC/LIORARV 50.40
43 TRAVEL EXPENSE/J ONEI 704.43
611 ADO' L CHGS/MAV BILL 69.95
$6 PROF S(RVICES/WATER 917.00
.90104 NEW WARMING HOUSE S.S 15.00
115 UTILITIES 69.04
115 UTILITIES 1).91
11b UTIL ITIES 18.97
115 UTIL ITIES 39.35
115 UTILITIES 139.99
292.16
729 REG FEE/GARY ANDERSON 15.00
SCH
mCH
•C1
n
u
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
06/08/93 12:06:52
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
35267 06/08/93 MONTICELLO COMMUNITY
35268 06/08/93 PAGE LINK
35268 06/08/93 PAGE LINK
35268 06/08/93 PAGE LINK
35268 06/08/93 PAGE LINK
35268 06/08/93 PAGE LINK
35768 06/08/93 PAGE LINK
35268 06/08/93 PARE LINK
35268 06/08/93 PAGE LINK
35269 06/08/93 POWER UP
35270 06/08/93 RIVERSIDE OIL
35271 06/08/93 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP
35211 06/08/93 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP
35271 06/08/93 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP
35211 06/08/93 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP
35271 06/08/93 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP
35272 06/08/93 UNI TOG RENTAL SERVIC
35272 06/08/93 UNITOG RENTAL SERVIC
35272 06/08/93 UNITOG RENTAL SERVIC
35272 06/08/93 UNITOG RENTAL SERVIC
35272 06/08/93 UNITOG RENTAL SERVIC
35272 06/08/93 UNITOG RENTAL, SERVIC
3S?73 06/08/93 UNOCAL
35274 06/08/93 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVA
35274 06/08/93 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVA
35274 06/08/93 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVA
4ENERAL CHECKING
Disburs!mant Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CL,
320 CONTRIB/SUMMER REC 17.500.00
703
PAGER
CHARGES
A2.60
703
PAGER
CHARGES
?1.30
703
PAGER
CHARGES
24.50
703
PAGER
CHARGES
71.30
703
PAGER
CHARGES
21.30
703
PAGER
CHARGES
21.30
703
PAGER
CHARGES
21.30
703
PAGER
CHARGES
21.30
194.90
641
SOFTWARE/CITY
HALL
358.28
496
GAS/STREET
DEPT
1,890.26
193
WARMING
HOUSE BLU
10.688.73
193
PARK
SLO MTC SUPPLIES 38.78
193
STREET
SUPPLIES
137.90
193
SHOP
OLD MTC SUPPLIES 68.34
193
PARK
SUPPLIES
107.35
11.041.10
211 UNIFORM RENTAL CHARGE 20.76
211 UNIFORM RENTAL CHARGE 28.32
211 UNIFORM RENTAL CHARGE 17.80
211 UNIFORM RENTAL CHARGE 12.80
211 UNIFORM RENTAL CHARGE 53.10
211 UNIFORM RENTAL CHARGE $3.09
180.87
213 RAS/FIRE DEPT 23.05
574 GARBAGE CONTRACT 1.276.60
524 SALES TAX/GARSAOE CON 412.99
524 LEAF PICKUP CHARGES 900.00
8,649.58
TOTAL 51.617.11
40,
•CH
*CH
•C1
1
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
06/14/93 07:57:00 Disbursement Journal
WARRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CL,
GENERAL CHECKING
35?16 06i 11/93 AMERICAN HUMANE AS50 .90303 CHECK VOIDED 1$0.00CR
35255 06/11/93 AMCON BLOCK & PRECAS 738 CHECK VOIDED 2.251.33CR
35275 00/11/93 EARL'S WELDING &. IND 747 BLAOES/SHOP & GARAGE 80.51
35276 06/11/93 DOUBLE O ELECTRIC .90186 NEW WARMING HOUSE 2.500.00
35277 06/11/93 AMCON BLOCK & PRECAS 738 NEW WARMING HOUSE 2.051.33
35278 06/11/93 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 118 WATERCRAFT TITLE 196.00
35279 06/11/93 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 118 WATERCRAFT/ATV/SNOW R 521.00
35280 06/11/93 RYAN CONTRACTING INC 750 CONST COSTS/C HIL 112.223.45
35281 06/14/93 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL 3 PEST CONTROL/LIBRARY 46.66
35282 06/14/93 ANDERSON & ASSOCIATE 10 PICNIC TABLE FRMS/P 1.013.61 .
.45783 06/14/93 BERGSTROM B ROS. INC. 21 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/ST 146.41
35284 05/14/93 CENTURY LABS 278 SOLVENT/SHOP 6 GAR 104.11
35205 06/14/93 COMMUNICATION AUOITO 39 BATTERIES/FIRE DEPT 44.79
35206 05/14/93 DONOHUE RAJKOWSKI LT 751 LEGAL FEES/TACO BELL 206.00
35207 06/14/93 FLEXIBLE TOOL COMPAN 59 EQUIP PARTS/SEWER COLL 49.58
35200 06/14/93 FOREST CITY ROAD LAN 563 LANDFILL CHCS/REFUSE 124.00
35209 06/14/93 GENERAL RENTAL CENT( 64 RENTAL OF EOUIP/PARKS 93.85
35280 06/14/03 GENERAL RENTAL CENTE 64 SIGN RENTAL/JUNK AMNE S 33.00
127.75 OCH
35290 06/14/93 GOPHER STATE ONE CAL 69 MISC PROF SERV/MATER 201.10
35291 06/14/9) HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 79 SHOP SUPPLIES 3.94
315291 06/14/93 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 70 WATER SUPPLIES 5.54
35791 06/14/0) HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 79 OIL/FIRE DEPT 50.4)
35291 06/14/9) MARRY IS AV TO SUPPLY 16 MISC SUPPLIES/FIRE DEP 71.14
35291 06/14/93 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY 18 VEH REPAIR PARTS/STREEI 1.99
91.34 vCH
35292 06/14/93 MATCH -PETERSON SAM 94 SHOVELS.ETC/STREETS 262.14
C35793 06/14/0) HEALTH PLANNING. & MG 130 PROF SERV/NRA 3.400.00
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
06/14/93 07:57:00
` WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
35294 06/14/93 HERMES/JERRY
35295 06/14/93 INDUSTRIAL MAINT. SU
35296 06/14/93 J M OIL COMPANY
3S297 06/14/93 M ► P TRANSPORT. INC
35298 06/14/93 MARTIE'S FARM SERVIC
35298 06/14/93 MARTIE'S FARM SERVIC
35298 06/14/93 MARTIE'S FARM SERVIC
35299 06/14/93 MAUS FOODS
35299 06/14/93 MAUS FOODS
35299 06/14/93 MAUS FOODS
35299 06/14/93 MAUS FOODS
35300 06/14/93 MCOOWALL COMPANY
t )5301 06/14/93 MIDWEST VISION DISTR
35301 06/14/93 MIDWEST VISION OISTR
35301 06/14/93 MIOWFST VISION DISTR
35302 06/14/93 MINNESOTA CITY MANAG
35303 06/14/93 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO
35304 06/14/93 MONTICELLO HOUSING
35305 06/14/93 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR
35305 06/14/93 MONTICELLO OFFICE PF.
35305 06/14/9) MONTICELLO OFFICE PR
35306 06/14/93 MONTICELLO PRINTING
35306 06/14/93 MONTICELLO PRINTING
35307 06/14/93 MONTICELLO TIMES
35301 06/14/9) MONTICELLO TIMES
35307 06/14/93 MONTICELLO MMES
15301 09/14/9) MONTICELLO TIMES
15307 08/14/91 MONTICELLO TIMES
C35301 06/14/93 MONTICELLO TIMES
35107 06/14/93 MONIICELLO TIMES
35301 06/14/9) MONTICELLO TIMES
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT C_t
81 LIBRARY CLEANING CONT 227.50
514 SHOP SUPPLIES 242.67
95 OIL/STREET DEPT 226.68
265 ROCK/BALLFIELDS 1.468.45
107 PARK SUPPLIES 14.41
107 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/NA 102.88
107 MISC SUPPLIES/PW INSPEC 4.45
121.74
108 MISC SUP/CITY HALL 83.68
108 MISC SUP/ANIMAL CONTRO 24.28
108 MISC SUP/LIBRARY 52.88
108 MISC SUP/SHOP ► GARAGE 13.19
174.03 •CHE
111 REPAIRS/LIBRARY 194.51
279 GLASSES/STREET DEPT 49.00
?79 GLASSES/MATER DEPT 30.50
279 GLASSES/SEWER COLL 30.50
110.00 •CH1
730 MEMBERSHIP DUES/AOMINI 60.00
185 ANIMAL CONTROL CONT 1.100.00
419 VEH NTC/FIRE DEPT 104.80
136 OFFICE SUP/PW INSPECT IS.SS
136 OFFICE SUF/ANIMAL CONT 79.11
136 OFFICE SUP/CITY HALL 11.16
136.47 ►CHE
131 MAILING LABELS/C MALL $0.06
137 PRINTED FORMS/FIRE OEPT 6.39
56.45 •CHI
140 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES 31.44
140 6L0 PERMIT INFORMATION 61.20
140 JUNK AMNESTY 9 LEAF I 178.20
140 WATER TOWER INFORMATIO 46.00
140 LEGAL PUBLICATIONS 177.00
140 SEASONAL HELP WANTED A 52.60
140 SEAL COATING PUGLICATI S2.40
140 DEP REG HELP WANTED A 144.00
646.04 •LHI
BkC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
06/14/93 07:57:00
1 WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
35308 06/14/93 MOON MOTOR SALES. IN
3 i3O8 OG/ 1'4/93 M0013 MOTOR SALES. PJ
35300 06/14/93 NORTHERN STATES POWE
35309 06/14/93 NORTHERN STATES POWE
35309 06/14/93 NORTHERN STATES ROWE
?c,31)9 05/14/93 NORTHERN STATES POWE
35309 06/14/93 NORTHERN STATES ROME
315309 06/14/93 MORIHERN STATES ROME
35309 06/14/93 NORTHERN STATES POWE
35309 06/14/93 NORTHERN STATES POWE
35)O9 05/14/93 NORTHERN STATES POWE
35309 06/14/93 NORTHERN STATES ROWE
35310 06/14/93 OLSON. USSEI.AGAN A
35310 08/14/93 OLSON, USSET.AGAN A
35310 06/14/93 OLSON, USSEI,AGAN Z
35311 06/14/93 ORR- SCHELEN- NAVERON
35311 06/14/93 ORR- SCHELEN-MAY[RON
35311 06/14/93 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
35) 1 1 06/14/9) ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
35) 1 1 06/14/93 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
35311 06/14/93 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
35312 05/14/93 PLUMSERV-PURCELL'S P
95312 06/14/93 PLUMBERV-PURCELL'S P
45)12 06/14/0) PLUMSERV-PURCELL'S P
35)13 06/14/9) PREUSSE'S CLEANING S
3531) 06/14/9) PREUSSE'S CLEANING S
35314 06/14/9) SAFETY-KIEEN CORP.
35)15 09/14/9) SCHAR6ER 6 SONS, INC
35515 06/14/9) SCHARBER 9 SONS. INC
35316 06/14/9) SPECTRUM SUPPLY CO.
1 r 35)11 06/14/93 WRIGHT COUNTY AUOITO
3S3 1? 06/14/91 WRIGHT COUNTY AUOITO
351111 06/14/91 WRIGHT COUNTY AUOITO
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLA
142 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/PAR 77.49
i42 VEH REPAIR PARTS/PARKS 33.55
61.04 +rNE
148 UTILITIES 2.409.41
148 UTILITIES 7?4.91
148 UTILITIES 4.382.80
148 UTILITIES 79.17
149 UTILITIES 532.73
148 UTILITIES 14.65
149 UTILITIES 300.57
148 UTILITIES 188.75
149 UTILITIES 472.43
148 UTILITIES 713.41
9.318.83
792 LEGAL FEES/KRAMER PRO 712.50
292 LEGAL FEES/MISC 2.401.25
297 MISC PROF SERV/C HILL 337.$0
3.451.25
167 ENG FEES/C HILLS I 33.347.77
162 MISC ENG FEES 1.540.14
162 ENG FEES/MART BLVD 2.086.88
182 ENG FEES/CUSTOM CANOP 150.15
162 MISC PROF SERV/WWTP 1.055.25
162 ENG FEES/PW EXPANS 2.129.51
40.310.90
251 CITY HALL BATHROOM REP 76.00
281 PARKS BATHROOM REPAIR 14.6)
?S1 SUPPLIES/SEWER COLL 19.16
109.79
11) FIRE HAIL CLEANING CON 50.00
173 CITY NAIL CLEANING CO 600.00
450.00
164 MTC AGRM1/SHOP 6 GAR 65.50
2?9 MISC SUP/PARKS 110.74
229 VEH REPAIR PARTS/PARK 146.97
)11.66
499 PARK SUPPLIES 123.20
219 SHERIFF'S CONTRACT 21.791.00
219 AOO'l LANOFILL CNA 11.242.56
219 HOMESTEAD CARO$ MAILE 491.60
)I.S21.)6
ck' JAL '=.V IEM
u:-ito/93 07:57:vo
UAs•.A4l GALE VENGVF'
,r Nt KAP r.ME,.N IN(,
3',118 OG/14/93 V.M.(.A. GF M]f4NFAF'O
35319 06/14/93 LARNOTH BRIISH W09K5,
GENERAL CHE6 KIN,,
OiBnur ..•m•',nt .loorrn. i
OE 5•C F'; r, 11'?N AM•)_RJT LA
2?4 !UNE CONTF'AC1 :'VM1 6.5.00
499 EscR;MS/SrREEr DEPT 315.'>4
IUTAI 114,961.46
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
06/16/93 14:4 9.40
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GCNCAAL CIICCXING
35231 06/15193 DAVIS WATER EOUIPMEN
35?31 n@1 15193 PAVTS W4TG0 eQUTPMPN
35320 08/ 15/93 MN DEPART Of NATURAL
35320 08/15/93 MN OEPAPT OF NATURAL
35322 06/ 16/93 ANDERSON 4 ASSOCIATE
35323 00/ 16/93 COAST TO COAST
35323 06/16/93 COAST TO COAST
35323 06/16/93 COAST TO COAST
35323 06/ 16/93 COAST TO COAST
35323 08/ 16/93 COAST TO COAST
35323 O6/ 16/93 COAST TO COAST
35323 06/16/93 COAST TO COAST
35323 06/ 16/93 COAST TO COAST
35323 06/16/93 COAST TO COAST
35323 06/ 16/93 COAST TO COAST
35323 06/16/93 COAST TO COAST
35323 06/16/93 COAST 10 COAST
35323 06/ 16/93 COAST TO COAST
35324 06/16/93 EMEO COMPANY INC
35325 08/ 16/93 FAIR'S GARDEN CENTER
315325 06/15/93 FAIR'S GARDEN CENTER
35325 06/10/03 FAIR'S GARDEN CENTER
35326 06/ 16/93 INTER CONF OF BLDG O
3S)27 06/16/93 ROROPCHAK/OL IVE
35126 06/16/9) MONTICELLO F IRE OEPA
35329 06/16/93 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
35)29 06/1619) NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
35329 06/16/03 NATIONAL GUSHING PAR
)5329 06/16/9) NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
35329 06/16/93 NATIONAL BUSH 1004 PAR
315329 06/15/9) NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
35329 06/16/93 NATIONAL GUSHING PAR
35329 00/16/93 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
35329 06/16/9) NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
Disbursement Journal
DESCRI PTI ON AMOUNT CL
290
CORRECT COOING
664.39C R
?9O
COOPECT C/101Nr
S$4. ?9
0.00
►C►
118
TITLE BOAT REG
242.00
118
WAIER/SNOW/ATV REG
288.00
530.00
Oct
10
SIGNS/STREET DEPT 1.075.60
35
BLD REP SUP/PARKS
22.66
35
MISC SUPPLIES/PARKS
356.46
35
MISC SUPPLIES/FIRE PEP
17.02
35
OIL/FIRE DEPT
12.65
35
MISC SUPPLIES/WAFER DE
24.43
35
CLEANING SUP/LIBRARY
26.45
35
SMALL TOOLS/SHOP 6 AAR
14.43
33
MTC Of INFO CENTER BLD
10.62
35
AOJ COOING
40.60CR
35
BLD REP SUP/SHOP 6 GAR
58.41
)S
MISC SUPPLIES/STREETS
20.60
35
BLD REPAIR SUP/CITY NA
29.29
35
MISC SUPPLIES/SEWER COL
5.47
558.09
►r►
.90286
MISC SUP /DEPUTY REG
64.41
55
OLD REPAIR SUP/WATER
16.29
55
SHADE TREE REPLCMT PRG
31.95
55
PW EKPAN SION TREE PLA
lb8.69
208.93
►U
791
MEMBERSHIP DUES/GARY A
75.00
97
MILEAGE E3PENSE
45.51
tab
FIRE RELIEf CONTRI6
691.00
144
UTILITY MTC SVP/WATER
87.71
144
FIRE DEPT SUPPLIES
10.03
144
CORRECT COOING
10.03CR
144
YEN REPAIR PARTS/SIRE(
$6.61
144
SHOP • GARAGE SUPPLIES
15.02
144
EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/PAR
61.46
144
EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/WAT
21.66
144
SMALL 70OLS/SHOP A GAR
9.07
144
EQUIP REPAIR PARTS /STR
27.10
275.6?
Oct
RRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
06/16/93 14:48:40
WAkRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
35330 06/16/93 OLSON i SONS ELECTRI
35330 06/15/03 OLSON A SONS ELEC'RI
35330 06/16/93 OLSON i SONS ELECTRI
35330 06/16/93 OLSON & SONS ELECTRI
35331 06/16/93 1.UALITY LAWN 14AINTEN
35332 06/16/93 RELIABLE CORPORATION
35332 08/16/93 RELIABLE CORPORATION
35332 06/16/93 RELIABLE CORPORATION
35333 06/16/93 TELEPRODUCTS CORPORA
GENERAL CHECKING
Disbursement .ournal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT C'
160 BLO MTC 6 REPAIR/FIPE 660.44
150 BLD +!'C C RE^ATR/C XAL 40.0^
160 NEW BRIDGE WARMING HOU 26.50
160 REPAIR PARK LIGHTS 458.22
995.16 +C1
319 MOWING/BLD INSPECTI 1.645.25
179 OFFICE SUP/COMPUTER 179.97
179 CITY HALL SUPPLIES 4.51
179 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 8.29
192.77 •C1
749 625.00
TOTAL 6.991.24
8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
OB/01/93 1?104:30 Oisbursem¢nt Journal
(
01,RRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION
AmOUNT
LIQUOR 'LUNO
16913 05/20/93 BELLBOY CORPORATION 800098 L IOUOR PUFCr,AtA
176.20
IOV0 UeieU/ba 6ELL60Y CiAPORATIC,o 800098 WINE PU;cl"SE
1?�
311.80
18914 06/20/93 PHILLIPS 1 SONS CO/E 800037 LIQUOR PUkCHASE
608.58
16914 05/20/93 PHILLIPS i SONS CO/F 900037 WINE PUPCHASE
164.70
773.28
+
16915 05/10/93 SUPERIOR P00OUC7S 8000416 BEER PURCHASE
40.61
16916 05/20/93 QUALITY WINE $ SPIRI 900040 LIQUOR PURCHASE
4.484.41
16916 05/20/93 QUALITY WINE E SPIRI 800040 WtINE PURCHASE
35.01
16916 05/20/93 QUALITY WINE • SPIRI 800040 041SC ITEMS FOR RESALE
17.95
4,537.37
h
1691) 05/20/93 GRIGGS. COOPER 0 COM 900010 LIQUOR PURCHASE
820.14
16919 05/70/93 JOHNSON SROS WHOLESA 000022 WINE PURCHASE
63.85
16919 05/20/93 GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE I 0000i9 BEER PURCHASE
8.811.50
1,920 05/20/93 MINNESOTA JAYCEES 900100 AOYERT29IN0
47.50
169?1 05/20/93 QUALITY WINE 0 SPIRI 900040 LIQUOR PURCHASE
231.08
16922 05/20/93 PHILLIPS 4 SONS CO/E 900037 VINE PURCHASE
1.029.10
10922 05/20/0) PHILLIPS i SONS CO/E 800031 1-1000R PURCHASE
49.51
1.077.81
S.
16923 OS/20/93 QUALITY VINE 8 SPIRI 800040 WINE PURCHASE
1.039.51
16923 05/20/93 QUALITY WINE i SPIPI 800040 LIQUOR PURCHASE
2.674.06
3.113.63
• 1
16924 05/20/93 GRIGGS. CO^PER 6 COM 800019 LIQUOR PURCHASE
4,103.00
16925 OS/20/03 JOHNSON OROS WHOLESA 800022 LIQUOR PURCHASE
843.55
16025 06/20/93 JOHNSON SRO$ WHOLtSA 900022 WINE PURCHASE
395.79
1.030.34
+
10920 05/20/93 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 000012 WINE PURCHASE
1.269.15
18926 OS/20/93 EAGLE MINE COMPANY 600012 DEE R PURCHASE
70.20
1.345.36
109?7 06/20/93 QUALITY WINE 8 SPIRI 600040 LIQUOR PURCHASE
09.04
1092. 05/20/93 PHILLIPS! SONS CO/E 600031 LIQUOR PURCHASE
11641.23
(1920 05/20/93 PHILLIPS E SONS CO/E 900011 WINE PURCHASE
126.05
1.602.'0
+
LIQUOR FUNO TOTAL
90.712.42
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
06/03/93
16:05:52
Disbursement Journal
*ARRANT
DATE
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
LIQUOR FUND
16929
06/04/93
BERNICK'S PEPSI COLA
800001
POP PURCHASE
252.47
16930
06/04/93
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
800002
TELEPHONE CHARGES
102.22
16931
06/04/93
COAST TO COAST
800004
LIQUOR STORE SUPPLIES 78.71
16932
05/04/93
DAHLHEIMER OISTRIBUT
600009
BEER PURCHASE
17.428.55
16933
06/04/93
DAVMOP HAMCO
800085
OPERATING SUPPLIES
39.36
16934
06/04/93
DAY DISTRIBUTING COM
800010
BEER PURCHASE
486.35
163934
06/04/93
DAY DISTRIBUTING COM
800010
MISC ITEMS FOR RESALE
3;.00
16934
06/04/93
DAY DISTRIBUTING COM
800010
MISC SUPPLIES
22.63
543.98
+t
16935
06/04/93
DIAMOND CLEAR ICE
800148
KOOLERS FOR RESALE
81.00
16936
06/04/93
DICK WHOLESALE CO..
600011
BEER PURCHASE
7.901.65
16936
06/04/93
DICK WHOLESALE CO..
900011
LIQUOR STORE SUPPLIES
34.65
w
7.936.30
6937
06/04/93
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
900012
VINE PURCHASE
2.109.34
16937
06/04/93
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
800012
MISC MIXES FOR RESALE
53.75
2.163.09
•
16939
06/04/93
FIESCH'S PAPER SERVI
800116
SUPPLIES/PAPER BAGS
143.95
16939
05/04/93
FOSTER-FRANZEN-CARLS
800015
ADO'L INSURANCE PREMI
299.00
16940
06/04/93
G 9 K SERVICE
800179
MTC OF BLO/RUG MATS
46.52
16941
09/04/93
BRIGGS, COOPER 9 COM
900019
LIQUOR PURCHASE
1.050.52
16947
06/04/93
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE I
800019
BEER PURCHASE
13.4)4.00
16943
06/04/9)
HOME JUICE
800136
JUICE FOR RESALE
71.25
16944
08/04/93
JOHNSON BROS WMOLESA
900027
NINE PURCHASE
7,111.05
16944
06/04/9)
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA
900022
LIQUOR PURCHASE
1.499.42
3.699.41
•�
16945
06/04/9)
JUOE CANDY • TOBACCO
900021
CICS B CIGARS FOR RES 5)9.12
16946
06/04/93
MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY
900130
KOOLERS FOR RESALE
41.75
16947
06/04/93
MoNTICELLO OFFICE PR
900031
OFFICE SUPPLIES
52.06
,6949
05/04/93
NORTHERN STATES POWE
900035
UTILITIES
969.72
1
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
06/03/93 16:05:52
Disbursement
Journal
LFkANT
DATE
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT r
LIQUOR FUND
16949
06/04/93
PAUSTIS ! SONS
800103
WINE PURCHASE
507.20
16950
0604/41
QUALITY WINE i SPIRI
800040
LIQUOR PURCHASE
2.122.47
16950
06/04/93
QUALITY WINE & SPIRI
800040
WINE PURCHASE
782.50
2.904.97 r�
16951
06/04/93
ROWS ICE COMPANY
800041
ICE PURCHASE
607.64
16952
06/04/93
ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT
800045
MISC ITEMS FOR
RESALE 152.10
16953
06/04/93
SUPERIOR PRODUCT;
800046
tEER PURCHASE
9.39
16954
06/04/03
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
800048
BEER PURCHASE
?3.113.75
16955
06/04/93
WRIGHT WAY SHOPPER
800106
ADVERTISING
260.00
LIQUOR FUND
TOTAL
71.378.19
0
E:RC FINANCIAL $YSTEM
05/08/93
12:07:50
Disbursement
Journal
(WARRANT
RRANT
DATE
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT C
LIQd,CR FUND
16956
06/08/93
FAIR'S GARDEN CENTER
800071
SHRUBS
9.53
16957
06/08/93
JOHNSON
BROS WHOLESA
800022
WINE PURCHASE
456.01
16957
06/08/93
JOHNSON
BROS WHOLES^
800022
LIQUOR PURCHASE
832.96
1.288.97 s(
16958
06/08/93
LIEFERT
TRUCKING
$00025
FREIGHT CHARGES
179.70
16959
06/08/93
MIDWEST
GAS COMPANY
800028
UTILITIES
26.64
16960
06/08/93
MONTICELLO
TIMES
800032
ADVERTISING
91.90
16961
06/08/93
NEWTON
MANUFACTURING,
800149
CALENOERS/ADVERTISING 300.31
16967
06/08/93
QUALITY
WINE & SPIRI
800040
BEER PURCHASE
23.95
16962
06/08/93
QUALITY
WINE & SPIRI
800040
WINE PURCHASE
6101.90
16962
06/08/93
QUALITY
WINE & SPIkI
800040
MISC ITEMS FOR RESALE
67.71
18962
O6/08/93
QUALITY
WINE 6 SPIRI
800040
LIQUOR PURCHASE
1.235.16
1.746.72 • •
' 6963
06/08/93
SENTRY
SYSTEMS, INC.
800066
ANNUAL ALARM MTC
INSP 53.25
16964
06/08/93
VIKING
COCA-COLA BOT
800051
POP PURCHASE
553.50
LIQUOR FUND
TOTAL
4.852.52
BRC FINANCIAL cYSTEM
06/16/93 14749:27
Olsbursement
Journal
WARRANT
DATE
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT CL
LIQUOR FUND
16965
06/16/93
BENIEK/LLOYD
800150
MISC PICTURES FOR
RESA 72.00
16966
05/16/93
MINN DEPARTMENT OF R
800006
MAY SALES TAX
12.16S Ii
16967
06/16/93
EAGLE WINE COMPANV
800012
WINE PURCHASE
77.36
16968
06/16/93
GRIGGS, COOPER 4 COM
800018
LIOLOR PURCHASE
1,739.10
16969
06/16/93
GROSSLEIN SEVEPAGE I
800019
MUGS FOR RESALES
1?4.20
16989
05/16/93
GROSSLEINI E'EVERAGE I
800019
BEER PURCHASE
8.544.85
8.669.05 *CH
16970
06/18/93
MINN DEPARTMENT OF R
800006
1/2 JUNE EST SALES
6.086 .25
16971
06/16/93
PHILLIPS & SONS CO/E
800037
LIQUOR PURCHASE
2.111 .20
16912
06/16/91
TOTAL RERTSTER SV STE
800112
SUPPLIES/LABELS
10.85
16973
00/16/93
U 5 WEST COMMUNIC ATI
800093
ADVERTISING
24.80
•
LIQUOR FUND
TOTAL
31,795.96
COUNCIL UPDATE
June 24, 1995
Enclosed you will find a copy of a five-year financial comparison that has been
compilwi by the Statp Auditors Office on the City of MontiecH s finances. The
information may be of interest to the Council in that you can compare the years 1987
through 1991 regarding revenue and expenditure trends.
The Auditor's Office provides us with a copy of this report annually, and the
information is obtained from our audited financial reports each year.
MINNESOTA FINANCIAL HEALTH PROGRAM
OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR
(612) 296-2551
CITY: MONTICELLO
COUNTY: ARIGHT
ECONOMIC VITALITY
INDICATOR: CHANGE IN POPUI.ATION
INDICATOR: CHANGE IN PROPERTY VALUES
02/06/91
.Oa -IME TOO
AVERAGE
5 YEAR 5 YEAR
1991 X CMAMGE % CMAMGE
,102
3.3% 25.9% 6.1%
1,943
3.7% 13.61 7.7%
1967
1068
1969
190x1
toput.n Dn
4,034
<, ">•
4,291
4,97
Percent [Harps
20.5%
5.8%
0.0%
15.1%
.utter of H-enotde
1,622
5 YEAR 5 YEAR
1,730
1,777
Percent CMan9e
24.5%
a '%
0.0%
2.7%
INDICATOR: CHANGE IN PROPERTY VALUES
02/06/91
.Oa -IME TOO
AVERAGE
5 YEAR 5 YEAR
1991 X CMAMGE % CMAMGE
,102
3.3% 25.9% 6.1%
1,943
3.7% 13.61 7.7%
e011-PIETE0
AVERAGE
5 YEAR 5 YEAR
1 W11
1965
1909
1990
1991
XCHANGA 1 CHANGE
Indicated
Market V.1ue E 339,710,643 6
366,009,301 S
366,424,652 S
366,642,407 E
411,%9,613
Percent Ckerpe 5.4%
7.7%
0.1%
6.1%
5.6%
21.11 21.71
A..ea..d V. (-t 1 107,671,053 t
116,265,956
....
....
....
P. -T C6.Vp. 6.41
7.6%
Grw. tu.ble Ta. CpecltV
15,405,139
....
....
eat Taxable tax CoWlty
....
15,574,593
16,161,0"
Eel,.. Reno 0.9 l
0.957
l 996
0.973
0.960
INDICATOR: TREND IM BUILDING PERMITS
a01111E TRo
AVERAGE
5 YEAR S YEAR
L991-
'v!Y
19M
1990
1991
X Cllm 6 1 CMA119
Value of
1.1 (ding ►exalt. / 6,776,630 1
6,1 70,100 1
4, 754,400 1
6,"0,500 6
11,123,900
Percent char** 47.41
9.0%
22 9%
77.5%
31.6%
64.11 39.51
Rimer of 111u11ding
pe -It. I.eued 136
155
134
164
169
P.rcent CAarge 14.3%
12.3%
11.5%
37.3%
A.2%
22.11
NOTE: A.terl.ke (•• •••. KI m Mary OAR" lndtc.te diet a Prc.nteye
c..nge 41e. too 1er0o to w e.enirgf„1
1069 poprl.tltar. and eou.6old. ere
the 31.1. Deexm-0.1'. 19M
-001 acre
IM 1969
p.Rulatl- w turn'Next br the c1t7.
CITY: NONTICELIA
REVENUE TRENDS
.2;OE;9..
INDICATOR: TREND IN REVENUE SOURCES
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
1907
1960
1909
1990
1991
REVENUES
AMOUNT
;
ANOINT
%
AN"T
t
AMOUIIT
t
A.N1AT
S
1 I R.-
red.r.l R.v.n,. Sher lrl9 S 0
0.01 s
0
0.01 3
0
0.01 t
0
0.01 s
0
0.01
MSG
0
0.01
0
0.01
0
0.01
0
0.01
0
0.01
- All 0th.,
0
0.01
0
0.01
0
0.01
0
o.n
0
0.01
Stat. - Loc•l Govt Aid
171,192
5.41
177,424
5.31
100,990
4.51
0
0.01
0
0.01
- M(.•t.ed credit
62,672
2.01
60,449
2.0%
67,094
2.21
2.040
0.1%
149,639
3.1%
- T. Wlt. Aid.
0
0.01
0
0.01
0
0.01
0
0.0%
C
0.01
- H Spry
20,000
0.91
0
0.0%
0
0.01
0
0.01
0
0.01
- All Oth.r
47,916
1.St
59,635
1.01
52,372
1.3%
49,001
1.31
40,061
1.01
Canty
4,010
0.21
4,154
0.11
5,420
0.11
23,270
0.61
12,970
0.31
Lx.l
130
O.Oi
170
0.01
0
0.01
1.162
0.01 _
0
0 0%
Tot • 1 1 nt Kpwrrra.nt R I
R.vwAw.
314,720
9.91
309,040
9.2%
325,076
0.21
77,169
2.01
210,670
4.31
T•.«
1,675,766
52.71
2, 006,Ue
59.ei
2,353,547
Sv.01
2,010,4"
71.21
2,771,716
57.01
spo.i.l A.. -t.
593,615
10.7%
447,961
13.31
4K, 327
I1."
310,219
7.91
1,000,556
20.71
F -h,.. T..«
0
0.01
0
0.01
0
0.01
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
S.1« 6 Not.l /1bt.l tu«
0
0.03
0
0.01
0
0.01
0
0.02
0
0.01
Ll- .rte P. -its
64,4n
2.71
74, 742
2.21
72, 121
1.01
93,•06
2.41
95,S94
2.01
Ch.r6.. ror S. I,"
179,701
5 62
176,300
5,21
103.609
4.61
WASE
4.01
200,116
4.31
71rNr. -d ror bit.
52,619
1.71
20,1"
0."
34,974
0.91
14,437
0.41
25,030
0.51
NIAt.11- 54"4"193..
Ir.t.r«t 1.-"
213,4"
6.71
272, OOS
0.11
400, SAA
10.21
367,293
9 31
346,421
7.11
All 0th., 111-
- -67,ON
2.11 57.305
1.76 147.952
_],,73
_ ux
2.2><
200.316 4.11
rot.t 6..4"93..
3,162,056
..............................................................
100.01
3,365,601
100.01
3,991,030
too.01
3.%7,020
loo 02
...................«..
4,4",434 100.01
T.w 0- ►.r c.prt.
s 704 92
s 7".34
s #30 09
s 7N."
• 953.93
A -I Por-t.p Ch.rr♦. ►.r L4p1t.
21 11
-0.11
10.61
-Wlt
19.0
2
CITY: WONTICELLO
REVENUE TRENDS
INDICATOR: CHANGE IN TAI LEVY
1967 1968 1909 1990 1991
Locst Tu Levy P7 1,677,157 1,621,660 2,200,316 2,569,621 2,506,740
Speciet Asacsvrnt "2, T32 406,206 3710,996 406,465 405,254
Tee levy ee a Percent
of T ... We Tex [peaty ... .... 14,3% 16.2% 15.5%
INDICATOR: TREND IN PROPERTY TAI COLLECTION
v 0 7 1968 1969 1990 1991
Percent Cot I.,w w n 100 0% 9'.5; 97,3% 90,9%
INDICATOR: TREND IN E^RNINGS ON INVESTMENTS
(GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS)
1967
Interest Inc ale t 21S,66r t
Percent Change 71
Interest Intoes w • Percent
of tots, eevertuee 6. Z
19m 1969
272,605 t 408,5" 9
27.6% 49.6%
8.1% 10.2%
bt#: r1 Property tes I" as r"wrtetf 6t Deps,teent of ee.ene
S
AOI ,[190
A9EAAIA
5 TEM 5 TEM
1990 1991 4 CWA % CNAW
x7,za3 t 3a6,421
10.1% 5.7% 62 0% 34.11
9.n 7.1%
I
CITY: MONTICELLO
EXPENDITURE TRENDS
02/09/93
INDICATOR: TREND IN EXPENDITURES BY FUNCTION
GOVERNIENTA4 fwpS
1997
1909
1999
1990
1991
CURRENT EXPENDITURES
AMMT X
AMOl1N1 %
AMOUNT i
AM"T
X
AMNT
%
General Goverrtoant
1 310,472 17.0% f
387,632 20.41
s 521,413 22.2% t
506,7"
19.5% s
611,670
23.5%
Pot to
127,743 6.6%
142,760 7.5%
144,590 6.2%
150,001
5.6%
172,043
6.6%
fire
79,593 4.2%
9l, 562 5.2%
06,457 3.6%
101,2"
3.9%
114,671
4.4%
Streets l Mi66wys
265,152 14.2%
253,567 13.4%
295,563 12.6%
3",397
13.2%
387,956
14.9%
Ref-. 1 sanititian
117,750 6.3%
111,002 5.9%
206,293 0.6%
271,640
10.4%
252,211
9.7%
Culture Prof 11-0-
152,417 9.1%
177,411 9.4%
169,431 7.2%
164,749
6.3%
212,132
0.1%
Urban Re0e"l oprnt 0 MasiM
59,196 3.2%
$4,690 2.9%
96,769 4.1%
207,501
0.0%
57,631
2.2%
Interest " Fiscal Cherpes
631,244 33.7%
617,633 32.6%
772,700 32.9%
754,674
20.9%
735,200
26.2%
Nuceltw Ecperditures
121.357 6.5% 53.214 2.0%
54.360 2.3X 106.653
4.1%
62.796 _2.q
Total Current Espwt0i tures
1,672,926 100.0%
........... ...... ...........
1,097,291 100,0%
......
2,349,674 100.0%
...... .... .................
2,609,603
100.0%
2,606,514 100.0%
Total Current Esprtotturn
.......................
Per Capita
1 461.99
s 442.16
9 547.56
s 526.17
s SIO.M
A -i Percent". C6arW
Per Cop, to
7.51
-4.3%
23.61
-3.SX
-3.3%
9~Y Of EXPfR01TURE1
Tutal Cwtrrt E44rdrtwn
1,677,926 50.0%
1,097,291 36.51
2,349,67% 49.61
2,609,"3
45.41
2,606,514
56.9%
total Capital Outlay
910,456 24.5%
2,323,712 44.6%
1,452,507 50.6X
1,466,043
25.9%
693,6"
19.5%
Debt ferric. Prim1pol
955.000 25.5% 983.W 4.91
916.975 19.4 1.647. ISO
. 26,5 1.079.544 23.61
Total fopenUltwes
3,746,382 100.0%
............................
5,204,645 100.0%
.................
4,719,234 100.0%
.................
5,7",076
100.02
.................
4,579,702 100.0%
......
Total Ep.rwistur.s Per Capita
s 924.12
61,212.97
{9,0".60
91,162.70
6 797.63
Ansel Nrc.ntese C6rW
Per C.pit.
19.11
31.31
9.3%
5.5
-22.72
913
CITY: MONTICELLO
...,.. _ TRENDS
02/08/93
INDICATOR: TREND IN
BY _ ..
(PER CAPITA)
GOVERIIIIEMTAL FUNDS
CURRENT EXPENDITURES
lye/
198E
1989 _
1990
1991
(Per CNVlte)
AMOUNT %
AMOUNT ;
AJ101MT %
AMORT S
AMORT k
Genera( Go -nm nt
t 78.56 17.0% S
90.34 20.4% S
121.51 22.2% S
102.% 19,52 S
119.89 23.5%
Police
31.51 6.8%
33.27 7.5%
33.70 6.2%
30.37 S.8%
33-72 6.61
Fire
19.63 4.2%
22.97 5.21
20.61 3.8%
20.49 3.9%
22.51 4.41
Street• L M1g6wye
65.41 14.2%
59.09 13.4%
66.88 12.6%
69.70 13.2%
76.04 14.9E
Refuse i Sanitation
29.05 6.3%
26.05 5.91
48.07 8.8%
54,96 10.4%
49.43 9.7%
CWture L I-etlon
37.60 8.1%
41.34 9.41
39.49 7.2%
33.34 6.3%
41.58 8.1%
Urban Red-topent 4 Ma ming
14.60 3.21
12.75 2.91
22.55 4.1%
42.00 8.0%
11.30 2.21
Intent and Tiacal [harp.
155.71 33.7%
143_94 32.6%
180.10 32.9%
152.74 28.9%
144.10 28.2%
nlecallaneo.s E.penoltur.
29.94 6.51 12,40 2.81
12.67 2.3;
21.59 4.1% 12,31 2.4% 1
Total Currant FApndlturee
461.99 100.0%
........... ...... .................
442.16 100.0%
.................
547.58 100.0%
...........
528.17 100.0%
...... .................
510.88 100.01
Annual Percentile CMrp.
-73%
-4.3%
23.32
3.55%
-S.l%
W114ANt 01 EXPIMDITMEI (Par CaDiu)
Tota( Cwrent E.perdNtwes
461.99 50.0%
W.16 36.51
547.58 49.R
528.17 45.4%
510.00 56.9%
Total Capital Out(.
226.56 24.St
541.53 44.6%
558 S7 1(1 R%
501 16 25.9%
115.19 19.5%
DNWX fervlX• ►r,mlpal
235.57 25,5 W -n _1" --M-79
_1914%
313.76 21.73 211.55 23,61
total 1 I twee
924.12 100.0%
1312.97 100.01
1,019.80 100.0%
1,161.70 100.01
097.43 100,01
Arernl Percantop Change
19,11
31.32
-9.3%
S.7i
-22.d
CITY: MONTICELLO
REV7:NUE/EXPENDITURE COMPARISONS
INDICATOR: BUDGET TO
ACTUAL EXPENDITURES
1987
02/09/93
INDICATOR: BUDGET
TO ACTUAL REVENUES
bd8.t.d Eapw101tur..
1"7
1988
'9X9
1990
1991
GENERAL FUND:
1,663,850 1,797,149
/.—t OV.r/Ur16.r
-0 8%
4.4%
-6.2% 10.2% 2.41
bdp.twl RevwxwF
1 1,231,000
1 1,3SS,505 S
1,538,375 S
1,631,"0 1
1,001,005
•Ct1/.t R.VwaM.
1,311,735
1,431,530
1,678,729
1,759,130
1,880,212
V.rc.nt 0"r/ -Under
6.61
5.63
9.1%
7.81
4.4%
SVFC16l RFVFK* FURS:
bdpet.a R.V.rtat.
8 205,708
1 436,100 3
771,167 1
505,400 1
599,254
4c[u.l R.vwaw.
331,431
546,361
859,466
559,770
693,055
9.rc.nt OV.r/-Under
61.1%
25.31
11.5%
10.8%
16.0%
INDICATOR: BUDGET TO
ACTUAL EXPENDITURES
1987
_10W_
1989 1990 1991
GENERAL FIRM:
bd8.t.d Eapw101tur..
1 1,231,000 1
1,355,505
8 1,536,375 % 1,631,440 1 1,801,005
6ctW1 ENpwwlt—
1,240,SS9
1,296,168
1,663,850 1,797,149
/.—t OV.r/Ur16.r
-0 8%
4.4%
-6.2% 10.2% 2.41
SPECIAL REVENUE ELIDE:
bdE.t.A E.pwWltur..
4ctu.l ENpwWltw"
►.rent-0"l/Und.r
1 757,150 6 377,600 8 523,631 8
803,109 537,135 399,053
.212.32 -42.3% 23.81
232, R00 1 486,860
585,674 S43,OOI
ISI 61 29 R
CITY: MONTICELL0
FUTURE SOLVENCY
u[/w/r3
INDICATOR: TREND IN OUTSTANDING BONDED INDEBTEDNESS
Per Cepi to 2.072.03 2,366.91 2,273.56 7,014.77 1,643.39
INDICATOR: TREND IN CURRENT DEBT SERVICE COSTS
(GOV1E"XE'11TAL FUNDS)
1967
1968
19l7
G -,.t ODU9atron %
2,020,000 S
3,045,000 f
2,930,000 It
Speci.l A.. --t
5,370,000
6,125,000
5,595,000
Tu Incrwent
1,010,000
995,000
1,230,000
C.O. Revere
0
0
0
Revenge
0
0
0
Alt Other
0
0
0
TOTAL BONDED DEBT
8,400,000
10,165,000
9,755,000
Per Cepi to 2.072.03 2,366.91 2,273.56 7,014.77 1,643.39
INDICATOR: TREND IN CURRENT DEBT SERVICE COSTS
(GOV1E"XE'11TAL FUNDS)
111011-METRG
11011 -METRO
AVERAGE
5 YEAR
5 TEAR
1970
1991
% CHANGE
% CHANGE
2,775,000 t
2,565,000
26.0%
9.9%
5,160,000
4,675,000
-9.2%
0.8%
2,020,000
1,945,000
92.6%
15.6%
0
0
....
7.6%
0
0
....
65.9%
0
0
....
754.6%
9,955,000
9,405,000
12.0%
10.5%
Per Cepi to 2.072.03 2,366.91 2,273.56 7,014.77 1,643.39
INDICATOR: TREND IN CURRENT DEBT SERVICE COSTS
(GOV1E"XE'11TAL FUNDS)
0
11011 -METRO
AVERAGE
5 YEAR 5 YEAR
1"7 1208
1969
199Q
1971
X NAM % CHANGE
Oebt Lemic• V.~t. 11
1,566,244 f 1,601,475 1
1,689,761 1
7,401,824 t
1,814,544
percent Ch.rge
7.Z% 1.0%
5.5%
42.1%
-24.5%
14.4% 9.4%
Debt ferric. .. . Percent
or 1ota1 Re-jo.
49.8% 47.6%
42..3%
60.8%
37.511
INDICATOR: TREND
IN L FUND LIKSILITIEB
Nd-NEteO
AVERAGE
5 YEAR 5 TEAR
Total Eiebilitte. r 1
�Q
3, 149,IS5 B 4%,931 1
4,"2.412 5
9•B►9D
4,130,360 %
p91l 210
% CMAN4[ HAR
Percent Charge
1.1% 11.9%
-3.41
1,9%
40.8%
-12.7% -11.1%
E lent It it in e. . Percent
of CWr.nt E.peMltur«
200.2% 221.2%
172.51
158.1%
125.6%
NOTE: 0.3 DW to • charge
in ecc-tlrg prirlciptee b"Inviirle
In 19M that 1 rabilltiea do net Inlude
ap-,.t
ee.-~t
bvlOed debt.
0
CITY: MONTICELLO
FUTURE SOLVENCY
02/09/91
iCA•/1CATGR. CR"GE Iii UKREZERVED tubZ BAiANCE&
O M-IET%0
A9EEAGE
1967 1908 19&9 1990 1991 ; CMAMGE % CMNOE
G.rrr.t EW S 1,156,338 S 1,266,350 4 1,284,529 % 1,246,510 f 1,271,995
Percent CMrpe 6.•% 9.5% 1.4% -3.0% 2.0% 10.0% 5.6%
% of Actual Eap"i turM 93.2% 91.7% 77.2% 69.4% 69.0%
Sp -,.i %avow. ivd. $ 234,518 • -119,016 6 412,623 t 460,286 S 7&,419
i.rc.nt C6.np. .... -150.7% -446. 11.61 69.6% 212.8% 32.4%
% of Actu.l E.pwWltur.. 29.2% -22.1% 103.4% 78.6% 226.2%
Gener.( fund 9.1- .. . % of
Tot.l Current Eap.rtdlt-- 61.7% 66.7% 54.7% 47.8% 48.8%
MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
INDICATOR: OPINION ON FINANCIAL .
1907 190 1989 1990 1991
Auditor'. Dpinlon lN"LIFIED UM911A(If I(D UMMALI(I(D LMOIIAI If IED U(td(MEIf1ED
CITY: MONTICELLO
MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
02709793
ZMUICATUR: TRS11U
166 NUMNIZI UY GMYIA21CCb
I:UMYAILCU TO POPULATION
(00 . , . . .,, L FUNDS)
(A■ Rported W tha city)
AVERAGE
5 YEAR 5 YEAR
1947 196E
1969
1990
1991
% CHS I CHANGE
Full Tim EFployaas
14 16
19
20
20
42.0% -1.2%
Espl Pya.s per 1,000 Popul.tlm
3.45 3.73
4.43
4.05
3.92
Part -Tim Esployees
7 6
12
13
13
W, 7% -5.4%
Eaployeea per 1,000 Populetim
1.73 1.40
2.60
2.63
2.55
INDICATOR: TREND IN CONPTINBATION AND EMPLOYER
PAID PAlAGE
BENEFITS
( . ., ..... , L FUNDS)
(Aa Repprt.d ly the clty)
NOR -RETRO
AVERAGE
5 YEAR S YEAR
1947 196E
1909
1990
199'
% CMA % CHANGE
Toad P.yroii 6
495,019 6 525,:19 /
727,0.7 t
652,614 S
711,176
Portant Ch.rge
11.1% 6.1%
34.45
-10.2%
9.1%
45.95 22.5% ,
ERploy.r Pard
Fnh9e @~its 6
62,963 1 125,021 S
165,660 S
145,467 S
172,599
Potent Ch✓p.
37.6% 50.7%
32.5%
12.2%
16.7%
101.01 22.2%
Frage Carr/lta FF
. Per -t of P.yrol l
16.6% 23. E%
22 65
22.3%
24.2%
INDICATOR: PROFIT OR -LOBS IN ENTERPRISES
1969
1990
1991
4l WOR 5106E
owrwrt6 Revwaraa
1 1.112,192 6
1.160,591 1
1 197,463 1
1,261,369
6 1,412,127
Operwr16 fp-.
,,oil, 143
',039,806
1,068.665
1,127,737
1,260.446
(lperytln6 IrcP
04,049
120,695
109,196
133,652
151,679
Nat Irt-
116,026
160,044
155,405
167,157
212,243
SEWN
Op.rwrli Revarva
6 54,090 6
570,059 t
30,763 1
419,661
6 479,153
0p.r.t1 @ tnp--
652,223
700,765
701,"4
742,563
765,170
ap.r.tlrt6 1-
306,133
330,726
-352,661
322,672
2",017
Nat lutes
502, 778
527,405
•354,013
324, YS
-282,417
WATER
Op.r.tlrt6 R.vetalN
1 132,921 6
14S,121 1
142,716 •
179,494
% 142,641
Oper.tlrt4 Espatre.
220,7%
239,612
415,479
M.90
291,515
0p.r.t lrp Isaac
17,973
94,491
•133.142
AW,449
144.617
Nat InaN
�Y, W4
91,625
•116,671
•111,667
-143.%A
CITY: MONTICELLO
'TWDICATOR: PROFIT OR -LOBS IN ENTERPRISES (Continued)
19"7 1988 1989 1990 1991
TRANSPORTATION
OpRrRt -g Rev s .... f 626 % 23,462 f 7,654
operet-g E,aP-- .... .... 8,263 63,760 67,616
Ope,.ting Inc— ... .... -7,637 -40,298 -59,962
Met IrxaRe ... .... -4,543 4,1" 4,009
RO