Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
City Council Agenda Packet 06-12-2017
AGENDA REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, June 12, 2017 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING/WORKSHOP Academy Room 5 p.m. Review of WWTP Operation Management Alternative — Management Contract versus City Staff Mayor: Brian Stumpf Council Members: Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance B. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Special Meeting Minutes from May 8, 2017 • Regular Meeting Minutes from May 8, 2017 C. Consideration of Adding Items to Agenda D. Citizen Comments E. Public Service Announcements/Updates • Summer Kick Off at Bertram Chain of Lakes — June 17, 2017 • Movie in the Park — June 24, 2017 F. Council Liaison Updates • Parks and Recreation Commission • IEDC • Planning Commission • I-94 Coalition G. Department Updates • City Administrator Update 2. Consent Agenda A. Consideration of approving payment of bills B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property D. Consideration of approving Resolution 2017-22 accepting donations for the Farmer's Market, Walk `n Roll, and Summer Movie in the Park series for a total donation amount of $1,443 E. Consideration of approving a special event permit allowing use of Ellison Park, West Bridge Park, Pioneer Park, core city public right of way, Community Center parking lot and related city assistance in conjunction with the annual Riverfest community celebration on July 13-16, 2017. Applicant: Riverfest Committee F. Consideration of approving a Special Event Permit allowing use of city streets and related assistance for the Downtown Block Party on July 12, 2017. Applicant: Monticello Chamber G. Consideration of approving a special event permit allowing use of Ellison Park and related assistance in conjunction with Art in the Park/Taste of Monticello on Saturday, July 15, 2017. Applicant: Monticello Chamber of Commerce H. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 668 amending Title 3, Chapter 3, Section 5 — Municipal Liquor Store I. Consideration of approving Resolution 2017-23 calling for a public hearing and granting preliminary approval for the Issuance of Conduit Revenue Bonds for the benefit of SRCS Building Company J. Consideration to renew 2017 membership in the MN Public Broadband Alliance for $1,500 K. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-24 approving a Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT L. Consideration of approving Resolution 2017-25 accepting a petition and calling for a public hearing on July 10, 2017 on vacation of drainage and utility easements for Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1, Monticello Commerce Center Fifth Addition. Applicant: Laurentian Properties, LLC. M. Consideration of appointing a representative to the Parks and Recreation Commission N. Consideration of approving a request for Amendment to Mills Fleet Farm Planned Unit Development for proposed changes to signage. Applicant: Ramerth, Tim — Wideseth Smith Nolting O. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-26 authorizing preparation of a Feasibility Report for 7th Street, Chelsea Road and Washington Street Improvements as related to the Fallon Avenue Overpass Project P. Consideration of authorizing final design services for the Fallon Avenue Overpass Project, City Project No. 16C006 Q. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-28 committing local matching funds for FAST ACT federal funding for the Fallon Avenue Overpass Project, City Project No. 16C006 R. Consideration of a request for amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Development and Final Stage Planned Unit Development for entrance and building additions in a B-2 (Limited Business) District. Applicant: Lemke, Lenore — CentraCare Health Monticello S. Consideration to approve Ordinance No. 671 for amendments to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 4, Section 3 — Fences and Walls; Chapter 4, Section 5 for regulations for multi -tenant building signage, Chapter 5, Section 3 for regulations on Accessory Use Dwellings, and Chapter 5, Section 4 for regulations for Temporary Uses — Food Trucks. Applicant: City of Monticello 2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion 3. Public Hearings 4. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of a request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment for `Places to Shop' to `Places to Work' and a request for Rezoning from a B-4 (Regional Business) District to a I -I (Light Industrial) District. Applicant: Jim Bowers and John Chadwick B. Consideration of approving waiver of garbage disposal service charges for mobile home sites C. Consideration of authorizing notification of contract non -renewal to Veolia Water for Wastewater Treatment Plant services D. Consideration to modify Hi -Way Liquor Hours to accommodate Sunday Sale 5. Added Items 6. Adjournment AGENDA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, June 12, 2017 — 5 p.m. Academy Room AGENDA 1. Review of WWTP Operation Management Alternative — Management Contract versus City Staff MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, May 22, 2017 — 5 p.m. Academy Room City Hall - Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart Absent: None Others: City staff. Jeff O'Neill, Wayne Oberg, Angela Schumann, Shibani Bisson, Tom Pawelk, John Rued, Rachel Leonard, Tom Moores, Sarah Rathlisberger, and Matt Theisen. Others: Claudia Dumont, MnDOT, and Tim Hennagir, Monticello Times. 1. Call to Order Mayor Brian Stumpf called the special meeting to order at 5 p.m. 2. 5 p.m. Fallon Avenue Bridge and Roundabout Design Update and Discussion Shibani Bisson, Chuck Rickart, and Andy Plowman, WSB, were present to provide a presentation on the Fallon Avenue Bridge and Roundabout Design. Shibani Bisson provided a history of the project and the need for an overpass which has been in plans as far back as twenty years. The presentation and discussion touched on the following topics: roadway and sidewalk/trail geometrics; roundabout design; bridge design; landscaping; lighting; project schedule; and assessments/funding. Visuals of the project concept plan, bridges, and roundabouts were shown. The anticipated project schedule provides for final design to be authorized in June/July 2017, right of way acquisition to be complete by November 2017 and final plan approval by MnDOT by March 2018. This would allow for construction to begin April 2018 and complete November 2018. Shibani Bisson noted that these are conservative dates and it is possible that the project could be bid sooner. There was discussion on landscaping at the medians approaching the roundabouts, whether to have natural plantings or to have it be concrete. Tom Pawelk commented that if they have natural plantings, there will be the need for more laborers in Public Works for maintenance. It was decided that cost estimates would be obtained for both natural plants and concrete. In addition, other cities will be contacted for their recommendation on plants or concrete. 3. Adjournment By consensus the meeting was adjourned at 6:10 p.m. City Council Special Meeting Minutes — May 22, 2017 Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Special Meeting Minutes — May 22, 2017 REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, May 22, 2017 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, and Lloyd Hilgart Absent: None. 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Stumpf called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. All City Councilmembers were present. B. Avvroval of Meeting Minutes Special Meeting Minutes from 8, 2017 ` Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the special meeting minutes of May 8, 2017. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. ` Regular Me�ing Minutes from May 8, 2017 CouncilmembeirFair moved approval of the ular meeting minutes from May 9, 2017. Councilmember Gabler secondM motion. Motion carried unanimously. C. Consideration of Adding Items to the Agenda • None. 14 D. Citizep Comments Third Graders from Pinewood Elementary School were in attendance. A few of the Itudents read letters to the City Council in regard to local city issues. Mayor SftTmpf thanked the students and noted that staff will address the issues raised and respond. E. Public Service Announcements Rachel Leonard, Communications Coordinator, provided an update on the following: - Memorial Day Hours MCC Summer Hours City Council Minutes — May 22, 2017 Page 1 1 6 Walk `n Roll Small Area Workshop and Open House F. Council Liaison Updates • BCOL — Tom Pawelk, Park Superintendent, provided an update. He noted that the group discussed the parking issue at BCOL and summer events. They also discussed forming a subcommittee group with the Park and Recreation Board to solicit private donations to help fund parks and/or park projects. • EDA — Councilmember Davidson noted th t there was significant discussion on land pricing guidelines in thendustrial Park. They also discussed the housing market study completed by WSB and outdoor storage. I � • MOAA — No meeting was held. • I-94 Coalition — Councilmember Gabler stated that the coalition had an update on what is happening in the legislature. I G. Department Updates \ Alllh� • Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator, provided an update on the wing: 1. The noise barrier neighborhood meeting will be on June 7. 2. The WWTP Workshop will be held at a Special Meeting June 12. 3. There may be a closed meeting on June 12 o discuss Wayne Elam's recommendation on bio -solid site. 4. City was awarded a grant from CenterPoint ergy in the amount of $2,150 for 4 -gas monitors. bo 2. Consent Agenda Councilmember Fair moved approval of the Consent Agenda excluding items D, E, and J. Councilmember Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 14 A. ..J�:tonsideration of approving Pe payment of bills. Recommendation: Approved th4ill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $1,042,815.91. B. Consideration of approving new hires/departures. Recommendation: Approved the hires for the Liquor Store, Streets, Parks, and DMV and the terminations for MCC and Liquor Store. C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property. Recommendation: No report this cycle. D. Consideration of approving Resolution 2017-18 accepting donations for Walk `n Roll bike sponsors in the amount of $2,775. Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. City Council Minutes — May 22, 2017 Page 2 1 6 E. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-19 accepting various donations for the Farmer's Market in the amount of $3,250. Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. F. Consideration of approving an application for a temporary on -sale liquor license for the Monticello Lions Club for a Riverfest Celebration/Block Party to be held Wednesday, July 12, 2017. Recommendation: Approved the application for temporary on -sale liquor license for the Monticello Lions Club for the Monticello Chamber of Commerce Block Party. G. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-20 calling for a public hearing on a proposed property tax abatement. Recommendation: Approved Resolution 2017-20 calling for a public hearing on a proposed property tax abatement. H. Consideration of approving pathway micro-surfack improvements in Meadow Oaks Development in the amount of $47,906. Recommendation: Accepted the quotes and to enter into a contract with ACI for the annual pathway micro - surfacing project in the amount of $47,906. I. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2 accepting bids an awarding contract for the 2017 Sealcoat and Fog Se ect. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 20147-21 accepting th ids and awarding the contract to Allied Blacktop from Maple Grove, Minnesota, based upon their low bid of $120,267.99 plus the addition of four parking lot§ at a cost of $31,041.50 for a total project cost of $151,309.49. Consideration of approving the purchase of a new city-wide phone system from Arvig at a cost of $16,000. Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA@F Consideration of approving the purchase of a new Case DV26 asphalt roller/compactor for the Public Works Department at a cost of $34,500 through the Central Equipment (Internal Service Fund) Fund. Recommendation: Approved the purchase of a Case DV26 compaction roller from Titan Machinery of Rogers, MN for a total cost of $34,500. L. Consideration of approving a Memo of Understanding with Wright County pertaining to the installation of Dynamic Speed Limit Signs along CSAH 39 at the intersection of Gillard Avenue. Recommendation: Adopted the Memo of Understanding with Wright County pertaining to the installation of dynamic speed limit signs along CSAH 39 at the intersection of Gillard Avenue as written. City Council Minutes — May 22, 2017 Page 3 1 6 2A. Consideration of items removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-18 accepting donations for Walk `n Roll bike sponsors in the amount of $2,775. Mayor Stumpf removed the item to acknowledge the contributors. Mayor Stumpf moved approval of adopting Resolution 2017-18. Councilmember Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. E. Consideration of adopting Resolution 42017- pting donations for the Farmer's Market in the amount of $3, Mayor Stumpf removed the item to acdg contributors. r E Mayor Stumpf moved approval of adopting Resolution 2017-19. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. J. Consideration of approving the purc o city-wide ph&vystem from Arvig at a cost not to exceed $16, 000. Councilmember Gabler remo tem and questioned whether or not the project could be split with only a p ion completed now. Wayne Oberg, Finance Director, responded that it is beneficial to provide staff with the same equipment since there could be issues with having different service lives of phones, especially since everybne is on the same network. Councilmember Gabler moved approval of purchasing a new city-wide phone system from Arvig at a cost not to exceed $16,000. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Re ular enda A. Consideration o rovinLy the 2017 Strategic Planning Document Rachel tnard provided a brief presentation outlining the 2017 Strategic Planning Document for the City. Following approval, the document will be listed on the City's website and will be reviewed and updated annually. The Strategic Planning Document includes the City's Mission Statement and six Strategic Goals. The Strategic Goals are: Create and Preserve Sustainable Livability; Build a Connection Community; Strengthen Our Image as a Destination; Support a Vibrant Economy; Be a Regional Leader; and Invest in People. The document includes information on how the City will use the City Council Minutes — May 22, 2017 Page 4 1 6 document making sure that staff is putting their time and energy into projects that benefit the City and moving together unified. Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the 2017 Strategic Plan Planning Document. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. B. Consideration of establishing an ad-hoc committee to evaluate options for the adaptive re -use or sale of Ellison Property and authorize staff to obtain quotes for comDletinc a hazardous materials analvsis. Mayor Stumpf commenced discussion on the item. The Mayor commented that he would like to see five members on the subcommittee — himself, 2 EDAs members, Planning Commission member; and Parks and Recreation member. Mayor Stumpf added that the chairs of the committees will be contacted in regard to members of this ad-hoc committee. Councilmember Gabler moved approval of ablishing mittee of five members that includes Mayor Stumpf, 2 ED members in . g Councilmember Davidson, Planning Commission member, an Parks and Recreation Commission member and moved to authorize staff to obtain quotes for completing a hazardous materials analysis. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried ianimously. By consensus the meeting was adjourned at 7:14 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approv : Attest: City Administrator City Council Minutes — May 22, 2017 Page 5 1 6 City Council Minutes — May 22, 2017 Page 6 16 City Council Agenda 06/12/2017 2A. Consideration of avvrovin2 pavment of bills (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City staff submits the attached bill registers and purchasing card registers for approval by Council. The bill registers contain all invoices processed and the purchasing card registers contain all card purchases made since the last Council meeting. Subject to MN Statutes, most invoices require Council approval prior to releasing checks for payment. The day following Council approval, payments will be released unless directed otherwise. A credit purchasing agreement and policy was approved by Council initially and card purchases must comply with the policy. If Council has no questions or comments on the bill and purchase card registers, these can be approved with the consent agenda. If requested, this item can be removed from consent and discussed prior to making a motion for approval. Al. Budget Impact: None A2. Staff Workload Impact: No additional work required B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $1,052,582.96. 2. Motion to approve the registers with changes directed by Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 or #2, per direction of Council. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Bill registers and Purchase Card registers Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Debbie.Davidson Printed: 06/01/2017 - 11:06AM Batch: 00215.05.2017 - 215.05.2017 Xcel\CPE Moiiii6effo Y Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 4263 CAYAN Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: True 357640 April 2017 (3) Genius Srv. Fee- cc machine rent 89.85 05/31/2017 609-49754-424100 357640 April 2017 (12,872) Trans. Fee 901.04 05/31/2017 609-49754-443980 Check Total: 990.89 Vendor: 1102 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: True 5/31/2017 5843395-5 54.67 05/31/2017 217-41990-438100 5/31/2017 5863599-6 52.20 05/31/2017 101-42700-438100 5/31/2017 5806932-5 67.35 05/31/2017 101-45201-438100 5/31/2017 5821009-5 369.59 05/31/2017 101-42200-438100 5/31/2017 5864452-7 288.63 05/31/2017 101-45501-438100 5/31/2017 5788570-9 110.63 05/31/2017 609-49754-438100 5/31/2017 5804618-6 15.00 05/31/2017 101-45201-438100 5/31/2017 5768542-2 166.32 05/31/2017 101-41940-438100 5/31/2017 5768542-2 3,846.16 05/31/2017 226-45122-438100 5/31/2017 5768542-2 62.37 05/31/2017 101-45175-438100 5/31/2017 5768542-2 83.16 05/31/2017 101-42800-438100 5/31/2017 5828859-8 18.36 05/31/2017 101-41940-438100 5/31/2017 8235331-9 47.74 05/31/2017 101-41941-438100 5/31/2017 8535333-5 19.62 05/31/2017 101-41941-438100 5/31/2017 8000015233-2 4,139.76 05/31/2017 101-41941-438100 5/31/2017 5799425 182.54 05/31/2017 101-43127-438100 5/31/2017 5799427 54.42 05/31/2017 101-43127-438100 5/31/2017 5820786 98.51 05/31/2017 101-43127-438100 5/31/2017 5837384 446.47 05/31/2017 101-43127-438100 Check Total: 10,123.50 Vendor: 2405 WELLS FARGO - Monthly Charges/Returns Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: True May 2017 Wells Fargo account interest earnings -2,152.01 05/31/2017 101-00000-362110 May 2017 Wells Fargo account service charge 2,219.12 05/31/2017 101-41520-443980 May 2017 MCC cc Fees (WF- Front Desk) 1,255.55 05/31/2017 226-45122-443980 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/01/2017 - 11:06 AM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number May 2017 MCC cc Fees (WF -Online) 19.35 05/31/2017 226-45122-443980 May 2017 MCC cc Fees (i -Access- Fmrs Mkt) 67.90 05/31/2017 226-00000-220100 May 2017 Liquor Store CC Fees (WF) 6,177.06 05/31/2017 609-49754-443980 May 2017 City Hall CC Fees (WF) 153.13 05/31/2017 101-41520-443980 May 2017 Utility CC Fees (Bluefin) 662.37 05/31/2017 601-49440-443980 May 2017 Utility CC Fees (Bluefin) 662.37 05/31/2017 602-49490-443980 May 2017 Utility CC Fees (AmEx) 59.48 05/31/2017 601-49440-443980 May 2017 Utility CC Fees (AmEx) 59.47 05/31/2017 602-49490-443980 May 2017 MCC ACH Return 5/12/17 303.50 05/31/2017 226-00000-115031 May 2017 MCC ACH Return 5/13/17 255.00 05/31/2017 226-00000-115031 May 2017 MCC CC Return 5/12/17 77.00 05/31/2017 226-00000-115031 Check Total: 9,819.29 Vendor: 1585 XCEL ENERGY Check Sequence: 4 05/31/2017 51-6572904-0 WWTP 13,081.36 05/31/2017 602-49480-438100 05/31/2017 51-6505905-0 - Water 7,437.80 05/31/2017 601-49440-438100 05/31/2017 51-6505906-1 - Sewer 1,190.65 05/31/2017 602-49490-438100 05/31/2017 51-0395766-0 - 405 Ramsey Pumphouse (1000) 259.85 05/31/2017 601-49440-438100 05/31/2017 51-4271112-2 - Library 906.25 05/31/2017 101-45501-438100 05/31/2017 51-6505907-2 - Parking Lots 86.38 05/31/2017 101-43120-438100 05/31/2017 51-6505907-2 - Parking Lots- auto protect. light: 47.09 05/31/2017 101-43120-438100 05/31/2017 ZZZNEP-IMPLEM 51-6505908-3- Civil Defens 18.62 05/31/2017 101-42500-438100 05/31/2017 51-6505909-4- DMV & Food Shelf 181.65 05/31/2017 217-41990-438100 05/31/2017 51-6505910-7- Liquor Store 1,571.79 05/31/2017 609-49754-438100 05/31/2017 51-6505911-8 - City Hall 1,767.76 05/31/2017 101-41940-438100 05/31/2017 51-6505911-8 - MCC 8,006.90 05/31/2017 226-45122-438100 05/31/2017 51-6505911-8 - Senior Center 415.94 05/31/2017 101-45175-438100 05/31/2017 51-6505911-8 - National Guard 207.97 05/31/2017 101-42800-438100 05/31/2017 51-6505912-9- Animal Shelter 92.25 05/31/2017 101-42700-438100 05/31/2017 51-6505913-0 - Fire Hall 650.00 05/31/2017 101-42200-438100 05/31/2017 51-6505914-1 - Shop / Garage 1,110.75 05/31/2017 101-43127-438100 05/31/2017 51-6505915-2 - Parks 747.61 05/31/2017 101-45201-438100 05/31/2017 51-6505915-2 - Skating Rink 33% water 175.97 05/31/2017 601-49440-438100 05/31/2017 51-6505915-2 - Ballfields 177.09 05/31/2017 101-45203-438100 05/31/2017 51-6505915-2 - Ballfields- Softball Assoc. 220.54 05/31/2017 101-45203-438100 05/31/2017 51-6505916-3 - Street Lights 8,215.01 05/31/2017 101-43160-438100 05/31/2017 51-0371645-4 - SwanCam- Parks 19.24 05/31/2017 101-45201-438100 05/31/2017 51-7780310-4 - Bldg Inspec. Garage 49.83 05/31/2017 101-41940-438100 05/31/2017 51-9391437-3 - 6th St.Bldg. 401.49 05/31/2017 101-41941-438100 05/31/2017 ZCULPS-EXPENS- 51-0623082-8- EDA 17.91 05/31/2017 213-46522-438100 Reference ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/01/2017 - 11:06 AM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Total: 47,057.70 Total for Check Run: 67,991.38 Total of Number of Checks: The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 6/12/17 Approved by Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/01/2017 - 11:06 AM) Page 3 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Debbie.Davidson T Printed: 06/01/2017 - 8:50AM Batch: 00202.06.2017 - 202.06.2017 Liquor Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Vendor: 4502 ARVIG Check Sequence: 1 258960a reissue- cc approved 1/23/17 Leeb Dec. 2016 1,539.00 02/14/2017 656-49877-421800 259994 reissue- Border States; Calix Jan 2017 7,118.24 02/14/2017 656-49877-421800 Dec 2016 reissue Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings -646.02 12/31/2016 656-00000-362900 Dec 2016 reissue- Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings 116.23 12/31/2016 656-00000-362900 Dec 2016 reissue -Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings -514.01 12/31/2016 656-00000-341190 Dec 2016 reissue -Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings -1,404.93 12/31/2016 656-00000-362920 Dec 2016 reissue -Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings -44,491.05 12/31/2016 656-00000-380510 Dec 2016 reissue ck 117093 lost -Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriti -60,311.49 12/31/2016 656-00000-380520 Dec 2016 reissue- Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings -16,747.84 12/31/2016 656-00000-380522 Dec 2016 reissue- Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings -22,319.77 12/31/2016 656-00000-380530 Dec 2016 reissue - Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings -351.75 12/31/2016 656-00000-380531 Dec 2016 reissue- Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings -357.64 12/31/2016 656-00000-380532 Dec 2016 reissue -Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings -7.80 12/31/2016 656-00000-380533 Dec 2016 reissue- Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings -1,805.00 12/31/2016 656-00000-380542 Dec 2016 reissue- Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings -4,326.00 12/31/2016 656-00000-380557 Dec 2016 reissue- Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings -197.28 12/31/2016 656-00000-380558 Dec 2016 reissue- Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings 1,816.96 12/31/2016 656-00000-380545 Dec 2016 reissue- Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings 2,879.91 12/31/2016 656-00000-380546 Dec 2016 reissue -Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Fees 70,926.69 12/31/2016 656-49870-430600 Dec 2016 reissue -Dec. 1-31, 2016 Management Fees 12,500.00 12/31/2016 656-49870-430700 Dec 2016 reissue -Dec. 1-31, 2016 Fixed Fees 77,756.39 12/31/2016 656-49870-430800 Dec 2016 reissue lost ck #117093 2/14/17 Dec. 1-31, 2016 169.24 12/31/2016 656-00000-202099 Dec 2016 reissue - Dec. 1-31, 2016 Vanco Deposits 13,813.94 12/31/2016 656-00000-202099 Dec 2016 reissue - Dec. 1-31, 2016 Subscriber Billings 42.44 12/31/2016 656-49870-443200 Check Total: 35,198.46 Vendor: 1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION Check Sequence: 2 58913500 resale - wine 252.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 58913500 resale - liquor 535.43 06/01/2017 609-49750-425100 58913500 freight 13.20 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 59023400 resale - wine 80.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 Moiiii6effo Y Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/01/2017 - 8:50 AM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 59023400 resale - liquor 282.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425100 59023400 resale - liquor 10.80 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 95820800 freight 0.14 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 95820800 resale - mix 31.50 06/01/2017 609-49750-425500 Check Total: 1,205.07 Vendor: 1067 BERNICK'S Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: False 54324 resale - beer credit -14.80 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 54325 resale - soda pop 71.85 06/01/2017 609-49750-425400 54325 resale -juice 32.80 06/01/2017 609-49750-425500 54326 resale - beer 1,556.55 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 57500 resale - soda pop 129.95 06/01/2017 609-49750-425400 57500 resale -juice 32.80 06/01/2017 609-49750-425500 57501 resale - beer 1,781.75 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 60310 resale -soda pop 102.45 06/01/2017 609-49750-425400 60310 resale -juice 32.80 06/01/2017 609-49750-425500 60311 resale - beer 1,616.30 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 5,342.45 Vendor: 4328 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIF Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: False 1080637229 resale - liquor 2,861.38 06/01/2017 609-49750-425100 1080637229 resale - wine 472.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 1080637229 freight 49.78 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 1080637230 resale - beer 156.60 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 1080640210 resale - liquor 1,307.51 06/01/2017 609-49750-425100 1080640210 resale - wine 112.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 1080640210 freight 19.25 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 4,978.52 Vendor: 4646 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES L.P. Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: True 1875617 resale - beer 25,909.15 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 1875617 resale - mix 39.30 06/01/2017 609-49750-425400 1879080 resale - beer 3,087.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 1885102 resale - beer 15,834.85 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 1885102 resale - beer n/a 101.10 06/01/2017 609-49750-425400 365-40 resale - beer credit -157.50 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 365-50 resale - beer credit -63.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 44,750.90 Vendor: 1095 CARLOS CREEK WINERY INC Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/01/2017 - 8:50 AM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 13820 resale- wine 402.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 Check Total: 402.00 Vendor: 4089 CARLSON & LYTER DISTRIBUTING, INC Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: True 375-79 resale - beer 190.50 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 190.50 Vendor: 1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: True 1279063 resale - beer 29,008.38 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 1279063 resale - beer n/a 306.30 06/01/2017 609-49750-425400 1279158 resale - beer 528.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 147737 resale - beer credit -104.20 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 147867 resale - beer 1,452.50 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 147867 resale - beer n/a 17.65 06/01/2017 609-49750-425400 148064 resale - beer 37,778.56 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 148064 resale - beer n/a 126.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425400 148113 resale - beer 216.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 148250 resale - beer 124.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 148432 resale - beer 1,623.85 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 148432 resale - beer n/a 17.65 06/01/2017 609-49750-425400 148825 resale - beer 14,898.64 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 148825 resale - beer n/a 258.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425400 148898 resale - beer 528.70 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 86,780.03 Vendor: 4218 HOHENSTEINS, INC Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: False 896325 resale - beer 649.50 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 896521 resale - beer 36.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 685.50 Vendor: 1259 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: False 2665566 resale - beer 1,009.50 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 2665566 resale - beer n/a 50.40 06/01/2017 609-49750-425400 2665594 resale - beer 2,040.74 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 2665594 resale - beer n/a 71.90 06/01/2017 609-49750-425400 Check Total: 3,172.54 Vendor: 1263 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: False 5724255 resale - liquor 8,403.38 06/01/2017 609-49750-425100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/01/2017 - 8:50 AM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 5724255 freight 123.84 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 5724256 freight 119.52 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 5724256 resale - wine 4,927.75 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 5724256 resale - mix 82.70 06/01/2017 609-49750-425400 5724257 resale - beer 21.99 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 5725587 resale - liquor 4,054.20 06/01/2017 609-49750-425100 5725587 freight 62.89 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 5725588 freight 31.44 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 5725588 resale- wine 1,297.58 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 5725588 resale- mix 102.55 06/01/2017 609-49750-425400 5725589 resale- beer 98.40 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 5728330 resale- liquor 9,397.54 06/01/2017 609-49750-425100 5728330 freight 129.60 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 5728331 freight 18.72 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 5728331 resale - wine 650.90 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 5729854 resale - liquor 6,714.85 06/01/2017 609-49750-425100 5729854 freight 74.29 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 5729855 freight 37.44 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 5729855 resale - wine 1,171.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 5729856 resale - beer 21.99 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 5731157 freight 69.34 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 5731157 resale - liquor 10,177.16 06/01/2017 609-49750-425100 5731158 resale - wine 1,148.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 5731158 freight 34.56 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 5734052 resale - liquor 2,762.47 06/01/2017 609-49750-425100 5734052 freight 32.15 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 5734053 freight 23.04 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 5734053 resale - wine 689.85 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 5735751 resale - liquor 456.25 06/01/2017 609-49750-425100 5735751 freight 5.76 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 5735752 freight 18.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 5735752 resale - wine 932.86 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 627082 resale - beer credit inv. 5696264 -21.99 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 627083 resale - liquor credit inv. 5713008 -376.25 06/01/2017 609-49750-425100 627084 resale - liquor credit inv. 5724255 -19.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425100 627084 freight credit inv. 5724255 -0.24 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 627085 resale - liquor credit inv. 5724255 -6.34 06/01/2017 609-49750-425100 627328 resale - mix -33.75 06/01/2017 609-49750-425400 627328 freight -1.44 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 627930 resale - wine inv #5724256 -13.10 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 Check Total: 53,419.90 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/01/2017 - 8:50 Alva) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 4456 LUPULIN BREWING LLC Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: False 1513 resale - beer 270.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 270.00 Vendor: 1303 M AMUNDSON CIGAR & CANDY CO, LLP Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: True 237759 resale - cigarettes 1,466.82 06/01/2017 609-49750-425500 237759 resale - tobacco; cork screws; bottle wraps; etc. 523.75 06/01/2017 609-49750-425400 Check Total: 1,990.57 Vendor: 1273 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: False 8591259 resale - wine 703.73 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 8591259 freight 10.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 8591336 freight 2.25 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 8591336 resale - wine 88.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 Check Total: 803.98 Vendor: 1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: False 2157173 freight 15.84 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 2157173 resale - wine 570.15 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 2157173 resale - wine n/a 116.25 06/01/2017 609-49750-425400 2166278 resale - liquor 3,857.35 06/01/2017 609-49750-425100 2166278 freight 38.88 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 2166279 freight 32.63 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 2166279 esale - wine 2,053.82 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 2167172 resale - liquor 2,482.20 06/01/2017 609-49750-425100 2167172 freight 33.60 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 2168987 resale - liquor 1,527.80 06/01/2017 609-49750-425100 2168987 freight 20.16 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 2168988 freight 5.76 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 2168988 resale - wine 192.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 2169961 freight 95.04 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 2169961 resale - liquor 5,475.75 06/01/2017 609-49750-425100 2170873 freight 12.96 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 2170873 resale - liquor 1,060.90 06/01/2017 609-49750-425100 2170874 resale - wine 1,258.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 2170874 resale - wine n/a 53.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425400 2170874 freight 35.04 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 2172787 freight 25.92 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 2172787 resale - liquor 2,115.75 06/01/2017 609-49750-425100 2172788 resale - wine 691.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/01/2017 - 8:50 AM) Page 5 Invoice No Description 2172788 freight 2173751 freight 2173751 resale - liquor 2173752 resale - wine 2173752 freight 265002 resale liquor credit inv. 2162514 265002 freight credit inv. 2162514 265003 resale - liquor credit inv. 2166278 265004 freight credit inv. 2166279 265004 resale wine credit inv. 2166279 1547392 Check Total: Vendor: 4575 REPLENISHMENT SOLUTIONS LLC 1906621 resale - beer Amount Check Total: Vendor: 3309 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS. 1544566 resale - liquor 1544566 freight 1544567 freight 1544567 resale - wine 1547390 resale - liquor 1547390 freight 1547391 freight 1547391 resale - mix 1547392 resale - wine 1547392 freight -151.50 Check Total: Vendor: 1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO 1950614 resale - soda pop 1950774 resale - soda pop 1956495 resale - soda pop 609-49750-425100 Check Total: Vendor: 1684 VINOCOPIA 0180518 resale - wine 0180518 freight 0180518 resale - wine credit 0180518 freight credit Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 12.96 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 77.77 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 5,858.55 06/01/2017 609-49750-425100 1,627.86 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 48.96 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 -151.50 06/01/2017 609-49750-425100 -1.44 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 -59.25 06/01/2017 609-49750-425100 -16.32 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 -1,026.91 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 28,140.48 Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: True 72.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425200 72.00 Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: False 1,717.81 06/01/2017 609-49750-425100 18.20 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 28.70 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 1,653.80 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 810.54 06/01/2017 609-49750-425100 10.27 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 1.40 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 38.87 06/01/2017 609-49750-425500 1,081.28 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 19.60 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 5,380.47 Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: True 538.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425400 379.25 06/01/2017 609-49750-425400 413.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425400 1,330.25 Check Sequence: 19 ACH Enabled: True 758.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 20.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 -104.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 -2.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/01/2017 - 8:50 AM) Page 6 Invoice No 0181019 0181019 0181019 Vendor: 1572 7134368 7134368 Vendor: 1573 7132855 7132855 7132855 Description resale - liquor resale - n/a beer freight Check Total: THE WINE COMPANY resale - wine freight Check Total: WINE MERCHANTS INC resale - wine resale - wine n/a freight Check Total Total for Check Run: Total of Number of Checks: Amount Payment Date Acct Number 218.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425100 120.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-425400 18.00 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 1,028.00 1,720.00 23.76 1,743.76 427.00 23.00 7.20 457.20 277,342.58 21 Check Sequence: 20 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Sequence: 21 06/01/2017 609-49750-425300 06/01/2017 609-49750-425400 06/01/2017 609-49750-433300 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 6/12/17 Approved by Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/01/2017 - 8:50 AM) Page 7 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Julie.Cheney Printed: 06/07/2017 - 2:31PM Batch: 00203.06.2017 - 203.06.2017 AP Invoice No Description Vendor: 2925 1 ST LINE/LEEWES VENTURES LLC 124266 Enabled: Cleaners 125237 06/13/2017 Flavored Syrups for Concession Drinks Check Total: Vendor: 2589 ALL ELEMENTS INC 4602 Repaired Leaky Windows in Basketball Court Ai Check Total: Vendor: 1018 ALLIED BLACKTOP COMPANY 296 06/13/2017 (203.50) gal Road Oil@ $3.25 Check Total: Vendor: 1039 AQUA LOGIC INC 46169 Service Repair Multi Ports Main Pool; Change E 46171 Service for UV ACH Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3181735 resale - beer 190.00 06/13/2017 Check Total: Vendor: 3887 KEVIN BARTHEL 6/5/2017 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 6/1/17 Check Total: Vendor: 1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION 59118800 Enabled: resale - wine Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 1 175.26 06/13/2017 101-45501-421100 939.75 06/13/2017 226-45125-425410 1,115.01 Moiiii6effo Y Reference ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/07/2017 - 2:31 PM) Page 1 Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: True 168.50 06/13/2017 226-45126-431990 168.50 Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: False 661.38 06/13/2017 101-43120-422400 661.38 Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: True 772.64 06/13/2017 226-45126-431990 190.00 06/13/2017 226-45126-431990 962.64 Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: False 128.00 06/13/2017 609-49750-425200 128.00 Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: False 68.00 06/13/2017 226-00000-220100 68.00 Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: True 52.00 06/13/2017 609-49750-425300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/07/2017 - 2:31 PM) Page 1 Invoice No Description 59118800 resale - liquor 59118800 freight 95897400 resale - grenadine 95897500 resale - olives Check Total: AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/07/2017 - 2:31 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number 780.52 06/13/2017 609-49750-425100 16.50 06/13/2017 609-49750-433300 42.19 06/13/2017 609-49750-425400 18.33 06/13/2017 609-49750-425500 909.54 87.36 508.65 422.10 348.17 1,366.28 346.50 1,424.88 23.80 1,795.18 2,050.00 2,050.00 40.00 40.00 24.00 53.30 10,870.90 10,948.20 1,100.00 320.00 1,420.00 Check Sequence: 8 06/13/2017 226-45125-425410 06/13/2017 226-45125-425410 06/13/2017 226-45125-425410 06/13/2017 226-45125-425410 Check Sequence: 9 06/13/2017 609-49750-425300 06/13/2017 609-49750-425100 06/13/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Sequence: 10 06/13/2017 101-45201-422500 Check Sequence: 11 06/13/2017 226-45127-421981 Check Sequence: 12 06/13/2017 609-49750-425300 06/13/2017 609-49750-425400 06/13/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Sequence: 13 06/13/2017 651-49010-431050 06/13/2017 101-45201-431050 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True Page 2 Check Total: Vendor: 1067 BERNICK'S 18324 Resale - Coffee 54963 Resale - pop, water, gatorade, juice 58207 Resale - pop, water, gatorade, juice 60951 Resale - pop, water, milk, gatorade Check Total: Vendor: 4328 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIF 1080643181 resale - wine 1080643181 resale - liquor 1080643181 freight Check Total: Vendor: 1086 BURNHAM COMPANIES LLC 4744 (91) yds wood chips Check Total: Vendor: 1089 SARA CAHILL 06/02/2017 Reimburse Purchase of Refrigerator for FI @ Pr, Check Total: Vendor: 4646 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES L.P. 1898388 resale - wine 1898388 resale - beer n/a 1898388 resale- beer Check Total: Vendor: 1094 CAREFREE LAWN SERVICE INC 16060 Riverside Cemetery (2) mowings 16060 Hillside Cemetery (2) mowings; letter & debris r Check Total: AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/07/2017 - 2:31 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number 780.52 06/13/2017 609-49750-425100 16.50 06/13/2017 609-49750-433300 42.19 06/13/2017 609-49750-425400 18.33 06/13/2017 609-49750-425500 909.54 87.36 508.65 422.10 348.17 1,366.28 346.50 1,424.88 23.80 1,795.18 2,050.00 2,050.00 40.00 40.00 24.00 53.30 10,870.90 10,948.20 1,100.00 320.00 1,420.00 Check Sequence: 8 06/13/2017 226-45125-425410 06/13/2017 226-45125-425410 06/13/2017 226-45125-425410 06/13/2017 226-45125-425410 Check Sequence: 9 06/13/2017 609-49750-425300 06/13/2017 609-49750-425100 06/13/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Sequence: 10 06/13/2017 101-45201-422500 Check Sequence: 11 06/13/2017 226-45127-421981 Check Sequence: 12 06/13/2017 609-49750-425300 06/13/2017 609-49750-425400 06/13/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Sequence: 13 06/13/2017 651-49010-431050 06/13/2017 101-45201-431050 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True Page 2 Invoice No Description Vendor: 4707 CDW GOVERNMENT LLC HWW1344 MS GSA Office Pro Plus 2016 Check Total: AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/07/2017 - 2:31 PM) Amount Payment Date Check Total: Vendor: 1106 CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC 00089347 Check Sequence: 14 Monthly Tank Rental 00119693 False Bulk Carbon Dioxide (228 lbs) 00121253 702-00000-421990 Bulk Carbon Dioxide (223 lbs) 00123642 Bulk Carbon Dioxide (164 lbs) Check Total: Vendor: 3750 MARK CHRISTIANSEN 6/5/2017 Check Sequence: 15 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 5/25/17 Enabled: False Check Total: Vendor: 1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC 1283814 resale - beer n/a 1283814 226-45124-421600 resale - beer 148636 resale - beer 148896 226-45124-421600 resale - beer credit 149321 resale - beer 149533 226-45124-421600 resale - beer 149536 resale - beer Check Total: Vendor: 4475 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP D028244 Check Sequence: 16 Capacitors (2) Enabled: False Check Total: Vendor: 1833 DAN & JERRY'S GREENHOUSEES INCORP( 350678 Adopt a Park asst. plantings- ST3 attached 353924 East Bridge- perennials; ground cover; annuals Check Total: Vendor: 2891 DISCOUNT POST & POLE 575688 True (44) 4x4-10 Rough- Parks Check Total: AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/07/2017 - 2:31 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: False 348.00 06/13/2017 702-00000-421990 348.00 Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: False 45.00 06/13/2017 226-45124-421600 72.60 06/13/2017 226-45124-421600 71.60 06/13/2017 226-45124-421600 59.80 06/13/2017 226-45124-421600 249.00 Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: False 21.00 06/13/2017 226-00000-220100 21.00 Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: True 322.30 06/13/2017 609-49750-425400 20,887.04 06/13/2017 609-49750-425200 3,280.20 06/13/2017 609-49750-425200 -33.60 06/13/2017 609-49750-425200 940.00 06/13/2017 609-49750-425200 692.80 06/13/2017 609-49750-425200 -41.25 06/13/2017 609-49750-425200 26,047.49 Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: True 6.98 06/13/2017 226-45126-440440 6.98 Check Sequence: 19 ACH Enabled: False 127.76 06/13/2017 101-45201-440900 73.92 06/13/2017 101-45201-440900 201.68 Check Sequence: 20 ACH Enabled: False 594.00 06/13/2017 101-45201-421650 594.00 Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 1153 ECM PUBLISHERS INC Check Sequence: 21 ACH Enabled: True 493861 201715 - CentraCare Health PH Ad# 682703 101.53 06/13/2017 101-41910-435100 493862 201716 - Red Rooster PH Ad# 690872 110.76 06/13/2017 101-41910-435100 493863 201717 - Mills Fleet Farm PH Ad# 690906 110.76 06/13/2017 101-41910-435100 493864 City Monticello Amend PH Ad # 690910 110.76 06/13/2017 101-41910-435100 493865 PH Amending Zoning Ord Ad# 690916 92.30 06/13/2017 101-41910-435100 493866 201710 -Spaeth Ken PH Ad# 690921 101.53 06/13/2017 101-41910-435100 493867 Ordinance 665A Ad# 692289 110.76 06/13/2017 101-41310-435100 493868 Ordinance 666 Ad# 692295 73.84 06/13/2017 101-41310-435100 496092 Ad #6812915/25 & 26 Memorial Day 40.00 06/13/2017 609-49754-434990 Check Total: 852.24 Vendor: 3681 STERLING EGAN Check Sequence: 22 ACH Enabled: False 6/5/2017 Referee Mens Hockey - 2 Games - 5/24/17 80.00 06/13/2017 226-45127-431990 Check Total: 80.00 Vendor: 1170 FASTENAL COMPANY Check Sequence: 23 ACH Enabled: False MNMON101691 (3) Safety Cans 305.19 06/13/2017 101-45201-420650 Check Total: 305.19 Vendor: 1174 FINKEN WATER CENTERS Check Sequence: 24 ACH Enabled: False 84066TG (3) 40# Solar Salt 24.75 06/13/2017 101-43127-421990 Check Total: 24.75 Vendor: 4710 RYAN FRUCCI Check Sequence: 25 ACH Enabled: False 6/5/2017 Referee Mens Hockey - 7 Games - 5/24, 5/31, 6/ 280.00 06/13/2017 226-45127-431990 Check Total: 280.00 Vendor: 3748 JEFFREY D GARDNER Check Sequence: 26 ACH Enabled: True 6/5/2017 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 5/11, 5/1 70.00 06/13/2017 226-00000-220100 Check Total: 70.00 Vendor: 3762 GARRETTS DIAMOND CITY BREAD Check Sequence: 27 ACH Enabled: True 6/5/2017 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 5/25, 6/ 51.00 06/13/2017 226-00000-220100 Check Total: 51.00 Vendor: 4391 WIL GOETSCH Check Sequence: 28 ACH Enabled: True 6/5/2017 Referee Mens Hockey - 23 Games - May 2017 420.00 06/13/2017 226-45127-431990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/07/2017 - 2:31 PM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Total: 420.00 Vendor: 1413 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC Check Sequence: 29 ACH Enabled: True 7050577 (277) tickets May 2017 - 1/2 Water 186.98 06/13/2017 601-49440-432770 7050577 (277) tickets May 2017 - 1/2 FNM 186.97 06/13/2017 656-49877-432770 Check Total: 373.95 Vendor: 1212 THOMAS P GROSSNICKLE Check Sequence: 30 ACH Enabled: True 6/6/2017 Sale of Grill to City 75.00 06/13/2017 101-45201-421650 Check Total: 75.00 Vendor: 1223 HAWKINS INC Check Sequence: 31 ACH Enabled: True 4086256 Pool Chemicals 602.98 06/13/2017 226-45124-421600 Check Total: 602.98 Vendor: 4478 MEGAN HILLUKKA Check Sequence: 32 ACH Enabled: False 6/5/2017 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 5/11/17 10.00 06/13/2017 226-00000-220100 Check Total: 10.00 Vendor: 4218 HOHENSTEINS, INC Check Sequence: 33 ACH Enabled: False 897828 resale - beer 427.50 06/13/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 427.50 Vendor: 1242 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFICE Check Sequence: 34 ACH Enabled: True 05182017 acct 1400-017-23-399 - fuel slips 4/19-5/18/17 197.40 06/13/2017 101-42200-421200 Check Total: 197.40 Vendor: 3749 DANIEL PAUL HUNZ Check Sequence: 35 ACH Enabled: True 6/5/2017 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 5/25, 6/ 34.00 06/13/2017 226-00000-220100 Check Total: 34.00 Vendor: 3971 INTL UNION OF OPER ENGINEERS LOCAL Check Sequence: 36 ACH Enabled: False July 2017 July Health Insurance - Union 15,210.00 06/13/2017 101-00000-217061 July 2017 July Health Insurance 47,700.00 06/13/2017 101-00000-217061 Check Total: 62,910.00 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/07/2017 - 2:31 PM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Vendor: 4709 IVES ENTERPRISES 5/18/2017 Escrow Refund - 6274 85th NE/Carlisle Village Check Sequence: 37 ACH Enabled: False Check Total: Vendor: 1253 J H LARSON COMPANY A101484057 Fluoresent Lamps (55) Various Watts Check Total: Vendor: 1259 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING 2689617 226-45126-421990 resale - beer 2689617 resale - beer n/a Check Total: Vendor: 1263 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 5737410 609-49750-425200 resale - liquor 5737410 06/13/2017 freight 5737411 3,037.45 resale - mix 5737411 resale- wine 5737411 Check Sequence: 40 freight 5737412 06/13/2017 resale - beer 5740328 58.73 resale - liquor 5740328 freight 5740329 609-49750-425400 resale - mix 5740329 06/13/2017 resale - wine 5740329 17.28 freight 5740330 resale- beer 5741290 609-49750-425200 resale - liquor 5741291 06/13/2017 resale - wine 5741291 18.72 resale - mix 5741291 freight 5741292 609-49750-425400 resale - beer Check Total: Vendor: 1270 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN CHARTERED MN190-00101 General EDA Matters thru 4/30/17 MN190-00153 Shred N Go TIF thru 4/30/17 Check Total: Vendor: 3829 STEVE LANGANKI Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Sequence: 37 ACH Enabled: False 2,000.00 06/13/2017 101-00000-220110 2,000.00 Check Sequence: 38 ACH Enabled: False 219.30 06/13/2017 226-45126-421990 219.30 Check Sequence: 39 ACH Enabled: False 2,931.85 06/13/2017 609-49750-425200 105.60 06/13/2017 609-49750-425400 3,037.45 Check Sequence: 40 ACH Enabled: False 5,487.13 06/13/2017 609-49750-425100 58.73 06/13/2017 609-49750-433300 114.75 06/13/2017 609-49750-425400 398.70 06/13/2017 609-49750-425300 17.28 06/13/2017 609-49750-433300 123.00 06/13/2017 609-49750-425200 1,507.50 06/13/2017 609-49750-425100 18.72 06/13/2017 609-49750-433300 41.35 06/13/2017 609-49750-425400 1,907.66 06/13/2017 609-49750-425300 54.72 06/13/2017 609-49750-433300 197.91 06/13/2017 609-49750-425200 4,228.73 06/13/2017 609-49750-425100 1,388.40 06/13/2017 609-49750-425300 64.00 06/13/2017 609-49750-425400 44.64 06/13/2017 609-49750-433300 43.98 06/13/2017 609-49750-425200 15,697.20 Check Sequence: 41 ACH Enabled: False 722.00 06/13/2017 213-46301-430400 893.00 06/13/2017 213-46301-430400 1,615.00 Check Sequence: 42 ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/07/2017 - 2:31 PM) Page 6 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 1055 Porta Toilets (21) 4/17 - 5/26; (2) 4/25 - 5/26 @ 1 1,161.00 06/13/2017 101-45201-431990 Check Total: 1,161.00 Vendor: 2626 HARRY LANTTO Check Sequence: 43 ACH Enabled: True May 2017 Planning Commission Meeting Recording 51211'1 60.00 06/13/2017 101-41910-431990 May 2017 EDA Meeting Recording 5/10/17 60.00 06/13/2017 213-46301-431990 May 2017 City Council Meeting Recording 5/8/17 & 5/22/: 120.00 06/13/2017 101-41110-431990 Check Total: 240.00 Vendor: 1902 VICKI LEERHOFF Check Sequence: 44 ACH Enabled: True 6/5/2017 Mileage Reimb 1/5/17 - 5/31/17 Agenda Deliver 19.37 06/13/2017 101-41310-433100 Check Total: 19.37 Vendor: 3933 CHARLES LONG Check Sequence: 45 ACH Enabled: False 6/5/2017 Farmers Market Token Collection Log - 6/1/17 55.00 06/13/2017 226-00000-220100 Check Total: 55.00 Vendor: 4456 LUPULIN BREWING LLC Check Sequence: 46 ACH Enabled: False 1577 resale - beer 360.00 06/13/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 360.00 Vendor: 1303 M AMUNDSON CIGAR & CANDY CO, LLP Check Sequence: 47 ACH Enabled: True 238543 resale - cigarettes 977.88 06/13/2017 609-49750-425500 238543 resale - tobacco, pop, bottle suits, can holders 378.28 06/13/2017 609-49750-425400 Check Total: 1,356.16 Vendor: 1306 MAIN STREET DESIGNS INC Check Sequence: 48 ACH Enabled: False 25868 (30) 3' x5' US Flags 818.40 06/13/2017 101-43120-422600 Check Total: 818.40 Vendor: 1229 MARRS ADVERTISING & DESIGN INC Check Sequence: 49 ACH Enabled: True 1425 (500) Parks brochure- creative adj. to make print 444.35 06/13/2017 101-45201-435100 1427 Business Cards- TP 51.50 06/13/2017 101-45201-421990 1427 Business Cards- JH 66.50 06/13/2017 226-45122-421990 1427 Business Cards- TM 51.50 06/13/2017 101-43120-421990 Check Total: 613.85 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/07/2017 - 2:31 PM) Page 7 Invoice No Description Vendor: 3745 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 20295585 (886) gal. diesel @ $2.12 20295587 Check Sequence: 50 (775) gal. unleaded @ $2.02 Enabled: True Check Total: Vendor: 1309 MARTIE'S FARM SERVICE INC 344087 (17) Flats; (10) Fountain Grass 06/13/2017 101-43120-421200 Check Total: Vendor: 2996 METRO APPLIANCE RECYCLING 582001 (3,445) E -scrap by lb; surcharge by lb.; (15) tires Check Total: Vendor: 2852 MIDWEST BUSINESS PROMOTIONS INC 12424 False Pens (300) 06/13/2017 101-43120-422500 Check Total: Vendor: 1827 MIDWEST LANDSCAPES I1542 (2) Skyline Honeylocust 2" Check Total: Vendor: 1349 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION P00008001 False 15C001 - MNDOT Material Testing & Inspectioi 06/13/2017 101-43127-421990 Check Total: Vendor: 1375 MONTICELLO PRINTING INC 5/24/2017 Park & Pathways Guides (1000) Check Total: Vendor: 1379 MONTICELLO UMPIRE ASSOCIATION M1-56 True Umpire Monday Softball League - (24 Games) T1-56 217-41990-434990 Umpire Tuesday Softball League - (44 Games) Check Total: Vendor: 4390 MICHAEL MUELLER 6/5/2017 Referee Mens Hockey - 17 Games - May 2017 Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Sequence: 50 ACH Enabled: True 1,876.23 06/13/2017 101-43120-421200 1,566.07 06/13/2017 101-43120-421200 3,442.30 Check Sequence: 51 ACH Enabled: False 577.65 06/13/2017 101-43120-422500 577.65 Check Sequence: 52 ACH Enabled: False 2,630.75 06/13/2017 101-43127-421990 2,630.75 Check Sequence: 53 ACH Enabled: True 132.66 06/13/2017 217-41990-434990 132.66 Check Sequence: 54 ACH Enabled: False 451.90 06/13/2017 101-43120-422500 451.90 Check Sequence: 55 ACH Enabled: False 133.98 06/13/2017 400-43300-459011 133.98 Check Sequence: 56 ACH Enabled: True 630.00 06/13/2017 101-45130-444140 630.00 Check Sequence: 57 ACH Enabled: True 672.00 06/13/2017 226-45127-431990 1,232.00 06/13/2017 226-45127-431990 1,904.00 Check Sequence: 58 ACH Enabled: False 160.00 06/13/2017 226-45127-431990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/07/2017 - 2:31 PM) Page 8 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/07/2017 - 2:31 PM) Page 9 Check Total: 160.00 Vendor: 1687 NORTHLAND SECURITIES INC Check Sequence: 59 ACH Enabled: False 4897 Financial Planning New Econ Dev TIF District ( 1,280.00 06/13/2017 213-46301-431990 Check Total: 1,280.00 Vendor: 4616 NORTHSTAR MACHINING LLC Check Sequence: 60 ACH Enabled: False 101563 dba Beckius Repair- 95 Ford not starting- ck. co( 174.00 06/13/2017 101-43120-422110 Check Total: 174.00 Vendor: 1401 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS Check Sequence: 61 ACH Enabled: True 22983 May 2017 - Tech Assistance - City Projects 1,872.83 06/13/2017 101-41910-431990 22984 201710 - Spaeth Industrial PUD Concept - May : 929.10 06/13/2017 101-00000-220110 22984 201712 - Carlisle - Paxmar PUD Amendment - > 521.60 06/13/2017 101-00000-220110 22984 201716 - Red Rooster PUD Amendment - May 2 831.30 06/13/2017 101-00000-220110 22984 Lamont Travel Center PUD - May 2017 130.40 06/13/2017 101-41910-431990 22984 Autumn Ridge PUD Amendment - May 2017 293.40 06/13/2017 101-41910-431990 22984 2017-17 - Mills Fleet Farm Sign PUD - May 201 766.10 06/13/2017 101-00000-220110 22984 Feathestone Final Plat - May 2017 293.40 06/13/2017 101-41910-431990 22985 May 2017 - Tech Assistance - Meetings 150.00 06/13/2017 101-41910-431990 Check Total: 5,788.13 Vendor: 1414 JEFF O'NEILL Check Sequence: 62 ACH Enabled: True 05/26/2017 Mileage Reimbursement 1/19/17 - 5/25/17 (414: 221.70 06/13/2017 101-41310-433100 Check Total: 221.70 Vendor: 4368 OFFICE DEPOT INC Check Sequence: 63 ACH Enabled: False 930256082001 case paper 35.79 06/13/2017 101-43110-421990 Check Total: 35.79 Vendor: 1858 OFFICENVIRONMENT BROKERS INC Check Sequence: 64 ACH Enabled: False 25452 Laminate Desk 900.00 06/13/2017 226-45122-424100 Check Total: 900.00 Vendor: 1411 OLSON & SONS ELECTRIC INC Check Sequence: 65 ACH Enabled: True 54813 Lighting Inspection; Blue Print Review & Marki 4,664.00 06/13/2017 226-45126-431990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/07/2017 - 2:31 PM) Page 9 Invoice No Description Check Total: Vendor: 4633 PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP INC 48691235 Cheese Sauce for Concession 48768497 Cheese Sauce for Concession Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 4,664.00 Check Total: Vendor: 1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO 2174814 ACH Enabled: True Resale - Liquor 2174814 226-45125-425410 Freight 2177284 06/13/2017 resale - liquor 266069 212.48 Wine Credit Inv 2173752 266069 Freight Credit Inv 2173752 Check Sequence: 67 Check Total: Vendor: 1442 PURCELL PLUMBING AND HEATING INC 038511 60.48 Replaced Board on Furnace at Animal Shelter 609-49750-433300 Check Total: Vendor: 1452 RCB ASSOCIATES INC 9483 06/13/2017 sweeper- install radio; fuse kit; etc. -Short Pay sa -4.32 Check Total: Vendor: 1455 RED'S MARATHON 05/03/17 Battery- Streets 05/26/17 Battery- Shop 5/8/2017 736.82 Shift Lever May 17 Parks May 2017 (5) slips gas cans- Parks Check Total: Vendor: 4022 REINHART FOODSERVICE LLC 783593 308.25 Food For Concession Resale 791830 Food For Concession Resale 799996 Food For Concession Resale Check Total: Vendor: 1470 RUSSELL SECURITY RESOURCE INC A29946 Well #5 405 Ramsey - Medeco High Sec. Rim L Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 4,664.00 Check Sequence: 66 ACH Enabled: True 106.24 06/13/2017 226-45125-425410 106.24 06/13/2017 226-45125-425410 212.48 Check Sequence: 67 ACH Enabled: False 4,343.61 06/13/2017 609-49750-425100 60.48 06/13/2017 609-49750-433300 6,243.88 06/13/2017 609-49750-425100 -144.00 06/13/2017 609-49750-425300 -4.32 06/13/2017 609-49750-425300 10,499.65 Check Sequence: 68 ACH Enabled: False 736.82 06/13/2017 101-42700-431990 736.82 Check Sequence: 69 ACH Enabled: True 308.25 06/13/2017 101-43120-431990 308.25 Check Sequence: 70 ACH Enabled: False 164.00 06/13/2017 101-43120-422100 130.00 06/13/2017 101-43127-422110 315.90 06/13/2017 217-41990-440500 53.76 06/13/2017 101-45201-421300 663.66 Check Sequence: 71 ACH Enabled: False 544.58 06/13/2017 226-45125-425410 851.73 06/13/2017 226-45125-425410 943.28 06/13/2017 226-45125-425410 2,339.59 Check Sequence: 72 ACH Enabled: True 284.80 06/13/2017 601-49440-422300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/07/2017 - 2:31 PM) Page 10 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 284.80 Check Total: Vendor: 4705 S2 SERVICES INC MN -0155 EnduraGlaze Ladies Restroom ACH Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 1474 PATRICIA A SALZWEDEL June 1 st Semi Monthly Contract Payment 936.00 Check Total: Vendor: 2443 SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA INC W5659754 5/20/17 - Wedding Security ACH Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 4703 DAN SEEGER 05182017 Large steel job box on casters 1,593.75 Check Total: Vendor: 4148 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. #3442 7452-4 Paint for FI @ Prairie Center (6 gals); Paint Tra, 7476-3 Enabled: Tape (3) 7604-0 06/13/2017 Drop Cloths (2 pk) 7616-4 Paint for FI @ Prairie Center (3 gals) 140.00 Check Total: Vendor: 1490 CYNTHIA R SIMPSON 965207 May 2017 cleaning service - Fire Hall ACH Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 3309 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS. 1550113 resale - liquor 1550114 resale - wine Check Total: Vendor: 2564 SPORTS PRO LLC 308 Enabled: Parts - Deck, Walking Belt, Nuts & Screws 308 06/13/2017 Labor - WO #394 Treadmill Repairs Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 284.80 Check Sequence: 73 ACH Enabled: False 936.00 06/13/2017 226-45126-431990 936.00 Check Sequence: 74 ACH Enabled: True 1,593.75 06/13/2017 101-42700-431200 1,593.75 Check Sequence: 75 ACH Enabled: False 140.00 06/13/2017 226-45123-431992 140.00 Check Sequence: 76 ACH Enabled: False 150.00 06/13/2017 101-45201-421650 150.00 Check Sequence: 77 ACH Enabled: False 259.76 06/13/2017 101-41941-422990 20.97 06/13/2017 101-41941-422990 13.92 06/13/2017 101-41941-422990 100.41 06/13/2017 101-41941-422990 395.06 Check Sequence: 78 ACH Enabled: False 100.00 06/13/2017 101-42200-431990 100.00 Check Sequence: 79 ACH Enabled: False 1,582.19 06/13/2017 609-49750-425100 1,086.37 06/13/2017 609-49750-425300 2,668.56 Check Sequence: 80 ACH Enabled: True 546.00 06/13/2017 226-45126-440440 35.00 06/13/2017 226-45126-440440 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/07/2017 - 2:31 PM) Page 11 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 314 Part - Thick Cable 111.75 06/13/2017 226-45126-431990 314 Labor - WO #396 - Life Fitness Shoulder Press t 140.00 06/13/2017 226-45126-431990 Check Total: 832.75 Vendor: 3594 STRATEGIC EQUIPMENT, LLC Check Sequence: 81 ACH Enabled: False 2876453 resale - margarita glasses 12 oz 75.00 06/13/2017 609-49750-425400 2876454 resale - cups & lids 58.97 06/13/2017 609-49750-425400 2876454 Assorted bags, canliners, 340.98 06/13/2017 609-49754-421990 Check Total: 474.95 Vendor: 4609 T & T CONSTRUCTION AND MASONRY Check Sequence: 82 ACH Enabled: False 1108 ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (292) blocks; (630) Burnish 3,055.00 06/13/2017 229-45202-453010 Check Total: 3,055.00 Vendor: 1516 TASC Check Sequence: 83 ACH Enabled: False IN1034530 7/1/17 - 7/31/17 Admin Fees 72.48 06/13/2017 101-41800-413500 Check Total: 72.48 Vendor: 4536 JACOB THUNANDER Check Sequence: 84 ACH Enabled: True 05/24/2017 Mileage to Wright Co Recorder (21.2 miles) 11.34 06/13/2017 101-41910-433100 Check Total: 11.34 Vendor: 1059 TILLER CORPORATION Check Sequence: 85 ACH Enabled: False 170515 dba- Barton Sand & Gravel- (52.90) T Class 5 R 581.90 06/13/2017 101-43120-422400 Check Total: 581.90 Vendor: 2614 TITAN MACHINERY Check Sequence: 86 ACH Enabled: False 186179 Compaction Roller- cc approved 5/22/17 34,500.00 06/13/2017 703-00000-165010 Check Total: 34,500.00 Vendor: 4656 TRUE FABRICATIONS, INC. Check Sequence: 87 ACH Enabled: False 226741 resale - bottle holders; flasks; glasses; etc 470.08 06/13/2017 609-49750-425400 226741 freight 56.41 06/13/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 526.49 Vendor: 1537 UHL COMPANY INC Check Sequence: 88 ACH Enabled: True 51503 Set Up and Enabled Platform Time Sync 579.00 06/13/2017 226-45126-431990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/07/2017 - 2:31 PM) Page 12 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Total: 579.00 Vendor: 4441 VALLEY PAVING INC Check Sequence: 89 ACH Enabled: False Pay Voucher 2 15C004 - Pay Voucher #2 - Th25/7th St Intersect 304,002.39 06/13/2017 400-43300-459014 Check Total: 304,002.39 Vendor: 1550 VEOLIA WATER N AM OPERATING SERV L: Check Sequence: 90 ACH Enabled: False 00068596 Jan - March 2017 Cargill Lab Testing 4,464.74 06/13/2017 602-49480-430800 00068655 July 2017 WWTP Operations & Maintenance 61,548.00 06/13/2017 602-49480-430800 Check Total: 66,012.74 Vendor: 1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Check Sequence: 91 ACH Enabled: True 1963006 resale - pop 161.00 06/13/2017 609-49750-425400 Check Total: 161.00 Vendor: 1567 WES OLSON ELECTRIC LLC Check Sequence: 92 ACH Enabled: False 8241 Materials- (4) LED; retro fit kit- back rm- Hi Wa 79.16 06/13/2017 609-49754-431990 8241 Labor- (4) LED; retro fit kit- back rm- Hi Way L 72.00 06/13/2017 609-49754-431990 8246 Materials - Breaker 25 amp 22.00 06/13/2017 226-45126-431990 8246 Labor - Replaced Breaker Kitchen Freezer 144.00 06/13/2017 226-45126-431990 8250 Labor- Ice Machine repair - Hi -Way 72.00 06/13/2017 609-49754-431990 8250 Parts- Ice Machine repair - Hi -Way 2.75 06/13/2017 609-49754-431990 8258 Materials- (3) Ballast kits; (6) capacitors; (20) fu 1,246.60 06/13/2017 101-45203-440440 8258 Labor- (3) Ballast kits; (6) capacitors; (20) fuses. 144.00 06/13/2017 101-45203-440440 8259 Labor - Replaced Ballasts 108.00 06/13/2017 101-45501-440100 8259 Materials - Wire & Switch 3.91 06/13/2017 101-45501-440100 8263 Labor - Meeting w/ Jerry& Tricia New Lighting 108.00 06/13/2017 226-45126-431990 8264 Materials - 200 Amp Breaker 14.01 06/13/2017 101-41941-440100 8264 Materials - Replaced Breaker 72.00 06/13/2017 101-41941-440100 Check Total: 2,088.43 Vendor: 3258 WESTMOR FLUID SOLUTIONS, LLC Check Sequence: 93 ACH Enabled: False 1287218 (20) Durakey - Shop 292.48 06/13/2017 101-43127-421990 Check Total: 292.48 Vendor: 2645 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS Check Sequence: 94 ACH Enabled: False 1 2017 Asssessment Fees 1,194.95 06/13/2017 101-41550-431250 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/07/2017 - 2:31 PM) Page 13 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Total for Check Run: 707,249.00 Total of Number of Checks: 97 The preceding list of bills payables was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 6/12/17 Approved by: Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/07/2017 - 2:31 PM) Page 14 Check Total: 1,194.95 Vendor: 1577 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS - ACH Check Sequence: 95 ACH Enabled: True June June 2017 Deputies Contract 101,470.00 06/13/2017 101-42100-430500 Check Total: 101,470.00 Vendor: 1581 WRIGHT CO RECORDER Check Sequence: 96 ACH Enabled: False 201700000036 BCOL - Quit Claim Deed #A 1340889 46.00 06/13/2017 229-45202-431990 201700000036 BCOL - Deed Restriction #A 1340890 46.00 06/13/2017 229-45202-431990 201700000036 16D002 - Misc Amend # A 1340891 46.00 06/13/2017 101-00000-220110 201700000036 201707 - Easement # A 1340892 46.00 06/13/2017 101-41910-431990 201700000036 201708 - Vacation # A 1341494 46.00 06/13/2017 101-41910-431990 Check Total: 230.00 Vendor: 4708 ZIEGLER CUSTOM HOMES INC Check Sequence: 97 ACH Enabled: False 5/9/17 Escrow Refund - 5954 Deer Street/Hillside Farm 2,000.00 06/13/2017 101-00000-220110 6/6/17 Escrow Refund - 5866 Deer St/Hillside Farms 21 2,000.00 06/13/2017 101-00000-220110 Check Total: 4,000.00 Total for Check Run: 707,249.00 Total of Number of Checks: 97 The preceding list of bills payables was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 6/12/17 Approved by: Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (06/07/2017 - 2:31 PM) Page 14 City Council Agenda 6/12/17 2B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for Citv departments (TE) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to ratify the hiring and departures of employees that have occurred recently in the departments listed. It is recommended that the Council officially ratify the hiring/departure of all listed employees including part-time and seasonal workers. By ratifying departures, the council also approves the expenditure for final amounts due to terminated and otherwise departing employees. Al. Budget Impact: (positions are generally included in budget) A2. Staff Work Load Impact: If new positions, there may be some training involved. If terminated positions, existing staff would pick up those hours, as needed, until replaced. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to ratify the hire/departures of the employees as identified on the attached list. 2. Motion to deny the recommended hires and departures. C. RECOMMENDATION: By statute the City Council has the authority to approve all hires/departures. City staff recommends Alternative #1, for the Council to approve the hires and/or departures as listed. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • List of new/terminated employees NEW EMPLOYEES Name Title Department Hire Date Class Ellie Engstrom Guest Service 2 MCC 5/16/2017 PT Katherine Brandon Friendship Island MCC 5/16/2017 Seasonal Erica Woytcke Farmers Market Manager MCC 5/17/2017 PT Theresa Wagner Farmers Market Manager MCC 5/17/2017 PT Kaitlyn Olmscheid Slide Attendant MCC 5/22/2017 PT Anna Parkin Slide Attendant MCC 5/22/2017 PT Kevin Lovold Slide Attendant MCC 5/22/2017 PT Erin Saunders Lifeguard MCC 5/25/2017 PT Lauren Vernick Liquor Store Clerk Liquor Store 5/30/2017 PT Daniel Tollefson Water and Sewer Worker Water 6/5/2017 Seasonal Aaron Clark Custodian MCC 6/8/2017 PT to FT Randy Haberman Building Maintenance Tech MCC 6/11/2017 PT to FT TERMINATING EMPLOYEES Name Reason Department Last Day Class Stephanie Norlin Voluntary MCC 8/29/16 PT Trent Teicher Voluntary MCC 4/23/17 PT Justin Bateman Voluntary MCC 5/10/17 PT Corinne Steele Voluntary MCC 5/17/17 PT Levi Zalomsky Voluntary MCC 5/19/17 PT Taylor Moshier Voluntary Parks 5/26/17 Temporary Jimmy Robbins Voluntary MCC 6/5/17 FT Michael Gresser Voluntary MCC 6/7/17 FT New Hire and Terms City Council 2017: 6/7/2017 City Council Agenda: 06/12/2017 2C. Consideration of approving sale or disposal of surplus property (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to declare certain items as surplus property and authorize the sale or disposal of those items. City Hall is planning to sell the `smart cart'. This large smart cart was replaced with a more compact version. Al. Budget Impact: Varies by the value of the property. A2. Staff Work Load Impact: Depends on the value of the property. Some items will be shopped as salvage; other items may go to auction or sold via formal bids or informal bids. State contracting laws will govern in absence of city policy. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the sale or disposal of surplus property as identified on the attached lists. 2. Motion to deny the sale or disposal of surplus property as recommended. C. RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommends Option 1 to approve the sale or disposal of surplus property as identified. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Surplus List B. Photos Equipment/Supplies Surplus List Department: City Hall 1. $100,000 + A. B. 2. $50,000 - $100,000 A. B. 3. $25,000.00 - $50,000.00 A. B. 4. $10,000 - $25,000 A. B. C. 5. $2,500 - $10,000 A. B. C. 6. $1,000 - $2,500 A. Smart Cart B. C. 7. $100 - $1,000 A. B. C. Date: 6/12/2017 11 ti City Council Agenda: 06/12/17 2D. Consideration to approve Resolution 2017-22 approving donations for the Farmer's Market, Walk `n Roll, and Summer Movie in the Park for a total donation amount of $1,443 (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is being asked to approve the donations/sponsorships for the Farmer's Market, Walk `n Roll, and for the Summer Movie in the Park series. Sponsors of the Farmer's Market are Stellis Health, Allina Health, and Lori & Charles Long. Sponsors for Walk `n Roll are Riverside Church and West Metro Buick. The sponsor for the movie is Quarry Community Church. As required by state statute, if the City accepts the donation of funds, the City Council needs to adopt a resolution specifying the amount of the donation and its use. Al. Budget Impact: The donation/sponsorship will pay for expenses of the run or movie programming. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff will do the work to put on this event. Our sponsors will be recognized in all our advertisement and banners. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt the Resolution approving the contribution and authorize use of funds as specified. 2. Motion to not approve the contribution and return the funds to the donors. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is to adopt the resolution accepting the contributions. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Resolution 2017-22 City of Monticello RESOLUTION NO. 2017-22 RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRIBUTIONS WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is generally authorized to accept contributions of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 465.03 and 465.04 for the benefit of its citizens and is specifically authorized to maintain such property for the benefit of its citizens in accordance with the terms prescribed by the donor. Said gifts may be limited under provisions of MN Statutes Section 471.895. WHEREAS, the following persons and or entities have offered to contribute contributions or gifts to the City as listed: DONOR/ENTITY DESCRIPTION VALUE Stellis Health Cash $250 Riverside Church Cash $125 West Metro Buick Cash $125 Quarry Community Church Cash $593 Allina Health Cash $250 Lori & Charles Long Cash $100 WHEREAS, all said contributions are intended to aid the City in establishing facilities, operations or programs within the city's jurisdiction either alone or in cooperation with others, as allowed by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that it is appropriate to accept the contributions offered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Monticello as follows: 1. The contributions described above are hereby accepted by the City of Monticello. 2. The contributions described above will be used as designated by the donor. This may entail reimbursing or allocating the money to another entity that will utilize the funds for the following stated purpose: DONOR/ENTITY PURPOSE/AMOUNT Stellis Health $250/Monticello Farmer's Market Allina Health $250/Monticello Farmer's Market Lori & Charles Long $100/Monticello Farmer's Market Riverside Church $125/Walk n Roll West Metro Buick $125/Walk n Roll Quarry Community Church $593/Movie in the Park Series Adopted by the City Council of Monticello this 12th day of June, 2017. Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk City Council Agenda: 06/12/17 2E. Consideration of approving Special Event Permit allowing use of Ellison Park, West Bridge Park, Pioneer Park, core citv public right of wav, Communitv Center Parking Lot and related assistance in coniunction with the annual Riverfest celebration on Julv 13-16, 2017. Applicant: Riverfest Committee (JS/PW) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to consider approval of use of Monticello park facilities and public rights of way, as well as related City assistance for the annual community festival of Riverfest. As in previous years, the Riverfest Committee is planning events for Thursday through Sunday throughout the community. This year's events will occur Thursday, July 13 through Sunday, July 16. A full listing of events and activities has been provided by the Committee. These events will include activities at Pioneer Park, the Bridge Parks, the Monticello Community Center and Ellison Park. The permit request also includes the closure and use of public rights of way in conjunction with the Riverfest parade on Sunday and closure and use of parking lot of the Monticello Community Center on Saturday evening. River Street will also be used for the 5K run occurring Saturday, although no road closure is requested. City Public Works staff have previously been involved with assisting in park preparation, event set-up and traffic control. The Wright County Sheriff's Office has been provided a copy of the permit for review and has indicated that off-duty deputies, along with several Reserve officers, are scheduled to work the Saturday night dance. The Sheriff's Office also has been provided with a map for the parade route activities. Traffic control during the parade will be handled by on -duty deputies, State Patrol and volunteers. Approval of the special event permit is contingent on continued coordination with the Public Works Department on site planning and traffic control, as well as coordination with the Wright County Sheriff's Office for traffic and safety assistance. The Fire Department has also provided assistance on scene during the community fireworks, which will occur on Friday, July 14. The Riverfest Committee coordinates other needed portable satellites, trash containers, and trash removal. The Riverfest Committee also works the Wright County Sherriff's Department for traffic control and security throughout the festival. The Lions Club has provided an insurance certificate naming the City as a second insured for events. The Riverfest Committee is included as an additional insured relating to Riverfest activity premises. Staff will work with the Riverfest Committee and City Attorney on certificate of insurance top verify coverage requirements. City Council Agenda: 06/12/17 Required alcohol permits were considered and approved separately by the City previously. Al. Budget Impact: Riverfest fireworks are budgeted out of liquor funds. Insurance costs for the fireworks are included in the City's insurance policies, and the fireworks vendor was required to name the City and School District as an additional insured on their policies as well. There is the potential for a minor loss of revenue for park rental during the dates Riverfest activities occur at the various parks. No other budget impact is anticipated. A2. Staff Workload Impact: The Parks and Streets Department staff spend time during the full week prior to the event preparing for the various activities. In addition, one to two days following the festival are spent in clean-up and follow- up details. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the Special Event Permit allowing use of Ellison Park, West Bridge Park, Pioneer Park, Community Center Parking Lot, City rights of way and related City staff assistance in conjunction with the annual Riverfest celebration on July 13-16, 2017, contingent on: i. Continued site plan and traffic control coordination with Public Works and the Wright County Sheriff's Office. ii. Lot closure signage and notification in coordination with the Street Superintendent as needed. 2. Motion to deny the Special Event Permit. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff supports Alternative #1 in favor of the Special Event permit for Riverfest. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Exhibit A — Riverfest Event Narrative and Parade Site Plan B. Exhibit B — Riverfest Insurance Certificate, Monticello Lions 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO -M" Community Development 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Special Event Permit Monticello Monticello, MN 55362 (763) 295-2711 . info(aci.monticello.mn.us Application Checklist Property Address Property Legal Description Property ID Number Owner Name Owner Address Owner Phone Owner Email Applicant Name Applicant Address Applicant Phone Applicant Email Name of Event Location/Address of Event Dates & Times of Event Complete Application Required The review and consideration of an application submitted shall only occur if such application includes all items that are required in support of the application and is deemed complete by the City Clerk's Office. Application Submission Schedule Application, required information, and payment must be submitted no later than 30 working days prior to desired approval date. Application Information Applicants shall note that in addition to a special event permits, any liquor license or permit, sign permits and building permits for tents may also be required and are not included within the special event permit application and approval. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment, and/or City property (including rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council. In addition, events which occur after 10 PM may requires review and approval by the City Council as related to noise ordinances. Please provide clear information in the application regarding these requests. 07/25/16 1 PROPIIM OWWR MW*RMATWN 'il1Q;NT W�' 0A I I q / , �. Complete Application Required The review and consideration of an application submitted shall only occur if such application includes all items that are required in support of the application and is deemed complete by the City Clerk's Office. Application Submission Schedule Application, required information, and payment must be submitted no later than 30 working days prior to desired approval date. Application Information Applicants shall note that in addition to a special event permits, any liquor license or permit, sign permits and building permits for tents may also be required and are not included within the special event permit application and approval. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment, and/or City property (including rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council. In addition, events which occur after 10 PM may requires review and approval by the City Council as related to noise ordinances. Please provide clear information in the application regarding these requests. 07/25/16 1 APPUCANT APPUCATION-SUSM1'iTA1. REWRE " CITY CHECK;tN CHECK A written narrative including: 1. A description of the proposed special event, how it will function on the property, hours and dates of operation, and any other information necessary to fully describe the request; and 2. An explanation of how the proposed special event will meet each of the review criteria specified by code (on reverse), as well as any additional criteria that may apply for the specific use. 3. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment and City property (including rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council A site plan showing all information necessary to accurately depict how the proposed use will function on the site. Information required on the site plan shall include but not be limited to: 1. The location of all existing and proposed structures; 2. Driveways and parking areas; 3. Proposed storage spaces; 4. Natural features such as woodlands, wetlands, shorelines, etc; 5. Proposed number of parking spaces (if applicable). If deemed necessary by the Community Development Department, a survey may be required to be submitted with the application in addition to a site plan. Certificate of insurance/liability coverage. Electronic copies of all written narratives and plan sets required above. Application fee of $50.00. Special Event Review Process ® The City Clerk will review all Temporary Use Permit applications. o Applications determined to conform with the approval criteria outlined in Monticello Zoning Code Section 2.4(L)(4)(a) and listed below shall be approved by the Community Development Department with any conditions deemed necessary. A copy of the approved permit shall be provided to the applicant which includes all conditions and comments. o Applications not conforming with the approval criteria outlined in Section 2.4(L)(4)(a) shall be denied by the Community Development Department. A notice of denial shall be provided to the applicant which includes all identified reasons for denial. Special Event Temporary Use Permit Approval Criteria Approval of a Temporary Use Permit shall only be granted once the City Clerk has determined the use shall. • Not be detrimental to property or improvements in the surrounding area or to the public health, safety, or general welfare; a Be compatible with the principal uses taking place on the site; • Not have substantial adverse effects or noise impacts on nearby residential neighborhoods; 07/25/16 Special Event Temporary Use Permit Approval Criteria, cont. o Not include permanent alterations to the site; o Not maintain temporary signs associated with the use or structure after the activity ends; • Not violate the applicable conditions of approval that apply to a site or use on the site; • Not interfere with the normal operations of any permanent use located on the property; and o Contain sufficient land area to allow the temporary use, structure, or special event to occur, as well as adequate land to accommodate the parking and traffic movement associated with the temporary use, without disturbing environmentally sensitive lands. • Not create an unreasonable risk of significant: 1. Damage to public or private property, beyond normal wear and tear; 2. Injury to persons; 3. Public or private disturbances or nuisances; 4. Unsafe impediments or distractions to, or congestion of, vehicular or pedestrian travel; 5. Additional and impracticable or unduly burdensome police, fire, trash removal, maintenance, or other public services demands; and 6. Other adverse effects upon the public health, safety, or welfare. o The special event shall not be of such a nature, size, or duration that the particular location requested cannot reasonably accommodate the event. o The special event shall not conflict with another permitted special event at the same location in a manner that will negatively impact the public health, welfare, or safety. Special Event Temporary Use Permit Conditions of Approval In approving the Temporary Use Permit for the special event, the City Clerk's Office is authorized to impose such conditions upon the issuance of the permit as may be necessary to reduce or minimize any potential adverse impacts upon other property in the area, as long as the condition relates to a situation created or aggravated by the proposed special event. The Community Development Department is authorized, where appropriate, to require: 1. Provision of temporary parking facilities, including vehicular access and egress. 2. Control of nuisance factors, such as but not limited to, the prevention of glare or direct illumination of adjacent properties, noise, vibrations, smoke, dust, dirt, odors, gases, and heat. 3. Regulation of temporary buildings, structures and facilities, including placement, height and size, location of equipment and open spaces, including buffer areas and other yards. 4. Provision of sanitary and medical facilities. 5. Provision of solid waste collection and disposal. 6. Provision of security and safety measures. 7. Use of an alternative location or date for the proposed special event. 8. Modification or elimination of certain proposed activities. 9. Regulation of operating hours and days, including limitation of the duration of the special event to a shorter time period than that requested or specified in this subsection. 10. Submission of a performance guarantee to ensure that any temporary facilities or structures used for such proposed special event will be removed from the site within a reasonable time following the event and that the property will be restored to its former condition. Durat'sosa of Permit A temporary use permit for a special event authorized in accordance with this subsection shall be limited to a maximum duration of 14 days per site per calendar year, unless otherwise specifically authorized by the City Clerk. 07/25/16 Property Owners Statement j I am the fee title owner of the described property and I agree to this application. I certify that I am in compliance j with all ordinance requirements and conditions regarding other City approval that have been previously granted. (Signature) (Date) Applicant`s Statement This application shall be processed in m name and I am the pp P Y e party whom the City should contact regarding the application. I have completed all of the applicable filing requirements and I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the City Ordinances and current policies related to this application and that the documents and information I have submitted are true and correct. (Signatur (Date) �Q /7 APP11 VAL (City Clerk Signature) (Date) (Community Development Director Signature) (Date) Special Event Permit I Approved ❑ Denied ❑ Approval is granted with the following conditions: Internal review checklist (as applicable): Public Works Routing Law Enforcement Notification Building Department Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Post -Approval Routing/Requirements Applicant Public Works Law Enforcement Notification City Clerk Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Liability Insurance Certificate Received Surrounding Property Owner Notification Complete Admin Parks Streets Director I t 07/25/16 4 /aWlo,,:f.'cCl(4 DIVE- Rpm* Monticello, Aiinnesota Is • Monticello Riverfest 2017 Special Event Permit July 13-17 U1�, 2 3, s-6 T 8 0111:12 13 ___.4 14'y 16 81920 22 23 24, T 28129 30 31 a The 2017 Monticello Riverfest will be a four (4) day event; starting on Thursday July 13th and continuing throughout the weekend ending on Sunday July 17th. The Riverfest Committee is seeking a Special Event Permit from the City of Monticello to host several events around the city associated with Riverfest. Below is break -down of each day and the specific locations where each event that will be held. Thursday July 13th: • Family Fun night and Car Show o Location: Pioneer Park o Time: 5:30 Pm to 8:00 Pm o Alcohol involved: No o Restrooms: Yes; pavilion o Parking: On -street parking and parking lot at Little Mountain elementary school EVENTS: ■ Collector Car show—Cars/trucks will be parked in the grassy area at the West end of Pioneer Park. Riverfest staff will direct the collector cars to park in a uniform manner. All vehicles will enter the park at an entrance point that will be predetermined by the Monticello Parks department. ■ Home Depot Kids Building Clinic—Several large tables will be set up West of the pavilion to allow kids to use their carpentry skills to build small wooden projects with the assistance from Home Depot workers. All scrap material and debris will be disposed of properly at the end of the clinic. Meals—A sloppy Joe meal will be sold by members of the Riverfest committee out of the pavilion. Snow Cones will also be provided — ■ The Wright County Sheriff's Office will be parking their mobile command post along the East end of the park ® Petting Zoo/Pony rides—Walton's Hallow will be setting up a small fenced area to house several small farm animals to allow children the experience to pet those animals. Ponies rides will be available ® Exotic Animal display ® Kids Games—Kids play area will be next to the petting zoo north of the pavilion. ® KRWC Road Show—Employees from KRWC radio will play music and play interactive games with the crowd. ® Pie Eating Contest—Local community leaders will take part in a pie eating contest ® Temporary Tattoos—The Monticello Royalty candidates will be providing free temporary tattoos to kids in the park. ® Airmaxx Trampoline Launchpad amusement ride Modaly My aclho U Talent Show o Location: Monticello High School o Time: 7:30 to 9:00 Pm o Alcohol Involved: No o Restrooms: High school o Parking: High School parking lot ® Fireworks o Location: Monticello School grounds o Time: Dusk o Alcohol involved: No o Restrooms: None o Parking: On -street and school parking lots o Monticello Fire Department will be on scene during the fireworks Saturday July 15th: • 5K run o Location: Starting in West Bridge Park; utilizing River Street ■ Traffic cones to be placed on West River Street at Walnut Street and in the 1300 block of West River Street to alert motoring traffic of "Runners on the roadway". No road closures o Time: 8:30 to 10:00 Am o Alcohol involved: No o Restrooms: West Bridge park o Parking: On -Street and West Bridge parking lot • Bean Bag Tournament o Location: Ellison Park o Time: 10:00 am to 3:30 Pm o Alcohol: Yes; Served by the Lions Club o Restrooms: Ellison Park o Parking: On -Street and upper parking lot s � • Street Dance `�V• o Location: West parking lot of the Community Center o Time: 7:00 to ;,I;G 'gym o Alcohol: Yes; served by the Lions Club o Restrooms: Severalp ortable toilets rented for event � o Parking: Community Center parking lot and on -street C- r A live band will be playing from 7:00 to 11:00 Pm, food and pop will also a k be served. 2 pj Sunday July 15th: • Parade o Parade starts at 12:00 Pm ■ The parade will begin at the intersection of Elm Ave and 3rd Street, travel east on 3rd street to Walnut; north on Walnut to 6th Street; west on 6th Street to Minnesota Street; south on Minnesota to 7t" Street, east on 7 t to the end of the parade. START 4F AW41-� ® Traffic barricades and cones erected at designated street �- intersections by the Monticello Public Works department ® Traffic direction and control provided in and around the parade by the Wright County Sheriff's Office ® 12 to 18 Volunteer "Parade Officials" to coordinate the STOP parade and keep the parade units moving ® Line-up starts on Elm Ave o Alcohol Served: No o Restrooms: Portable toilets on designated street corners o Garbage: Trash cans at designated street corners o Parking: On -street and area parking lots ® Duck Race o Duck Race starts at 3:30 Pm; begins at the Hwy 25 bridge and ends at Ellison Park o Riverfest committee drops the ducks from the Hwy 25 bridge into the Mississippi river (River permit obtained from the Wright County Sheriff's Office) o Riverfest designees with boats on the river will coordinate the Duck race Ellison ParkActivity-2:00 to 6:00 Prn ® Monticello Royalty o Coronation of Monticello Royalty at 4:40 o Lions Wellness van parked in the east park* r lot f �- re 0--k-Judmitia"nu pulled -we& /-I"i r o Kids games in the grassy area at the east end of the park o Bingo tent o KRWC Roadshow o Alcohol: Yes, served by the Lions club o Parking: On -street and area parking lots 0 Wright County Sheriff's Office will assist with security in Ellison park alung-- DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) ACOOR " CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 11/29/2016 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER I CONTACT Customer Care NAME: West Bend Mutual Insurance Company PHONE Ext): (866) 926-4244 (FAAX,No): (262)365-2200 1900 South 18th Avenue E-MAIL ADDRESS: customercare@wbmi.com West Bend WI 53095 INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURER A West Bend Mutual Insurance Company 15350 INSURED Monticello Lions Club PO Box 673 11 55362 INSURER B: INSURER C : INSURER D; Montice o MN I INSURER E INSURER F COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: Revised 17-18 Master Cert REVISION NUMBER: 1 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES, LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS, INSR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL SUBR POLICY EFF POLICY EXP I LIMITS LTR INSD WVD POLICY NUMBER (MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY) X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY A _� CLAIMS -MADE F_x_1 OCCUR GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY 7 PRO- ❑ LOC JECT OTHER: AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS AUTOS NON -OWNED HIRED AUTOS AUTOS UMBRELLA LIABHCLAIMS-MADE OCCUR EXCESS LIAR DED I I RETENTION $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? N / A (Mandatory in NH) If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT I $ (Ea accident) BODILY INJURY (Per person) I $ BODILY INJURY (Per accident) I $ PROPERTY DAMAGE $ (Per accident) EACH OCCURRENCE $ (AGGREGATE $ $ PER STATUTE I I EERH E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEJ $ E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT I $ A Liquor Liability X A107247 1/1/2017 1/1/2018 Each Common Cause 1,000,000 Aggregate 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) City of Monticello is recognized as an Additional Insured with regard to Liquor Liability coverage per form NS0280 attached to this policy. Event dates as follows: Block party: July 12 July 15 & 16 CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE City of Monticello THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN 505 Walnut St ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Monticello, MN 55362-8821 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Marie Dailey/MDAILE ©1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2014/01) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD INS025 (201401) EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 DAMAGE TO RENTED PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $ 100,000 A107246 1/1/2017 1/1/2018 I MED EXP (Any one person) $ Excluded PERSONAL & ADV INJURY I $ 1,000,000 IGENERAL AGGREGATE I$ 2,000,000 PRODUCTS - COMP/OPAGG I $ 2,000,000 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT I $ (Ea accident) BODILY INJURY (Per person) I $ BODILY INJURY (Per accident) I $ PROPERTY DAMAGE $ (Per accident) EACH OCCURRENCE $ (AGGREGATE $ $ PER STATUTE I I EERH E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEJ $ E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT I $ A Liquor Liability X A107247 1/1/2017 1/1/2018 Each Common Cause 1,000,000 Aggregate 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) City of Monticello is recognized as an Additional Insured with regard to Liquor Liability coverage per form NS0280 attached to this policy. Event dates as follows: Block party: July 12 July 15 & 16 CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE City of Monticello THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN 505 Walnut St ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Monticello, MN 55362-8821 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Marie Dailey/MDAILE ©1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2014/01) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD INS025 (201401) City Council Agenda: 06/12/17 2F. Consideration to approve a Special Event Permit allowing use of city streets and related assistance for the Downtown Block Partv on July 12, 2017. Applicant: Monticello Chamber (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to consider approval of a special event permit for the Downtown Block Party, occurring on Wednesday, July 12, 2017. As part of the approval, the City Council is asked to consider the closure of Walnut Street, the use of the 3rd Street parking lot, and related City assistance and equipment for traffic control and event amenities. In specific, the application lists the following requested City assistance: • "No Parking" signs placed on Walnut (by 8 p.m. on July 11) • Street barricades on Walnut ( 7 a.m. on July 12) • Barricades in Third St. parking lot (July 11) • Pedestrian crosswalk markers (July 12) • Trash receptacles, picnic tables, traffic cones (July 12) The applicant for the event is the Chamber of Commerce, on behalf of the downtown area businesses. Similar to previous years, the request includes the closure of Walnut Street between Broadway West and Third Street. The event will utilize the entire right of way, including portions of the boulevard in front of Walnut Street businesses in that area. The applicant has requested that the street be closed between 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM to accommodate volunteer set-up and take-down before and after the event. The event itself will occur from 4:30 PM to 9:00 PM. Council approval is also requested for use of the municipal parking lot along Third Street for event activities. As with the 2016 permit, the applicant is requesting the ability to stake a 30' x 40' tent in the Third Street parking lot. Any holes in the lot will require patching to the satisfaction of the Public Works department. The tent will be set up Tuesday and removed Thursday. Therefore, the applicant is requesting the use of that portion of the Third Street parking lot beginning on Tuesday, July 11 through a portion of Thursday, July 13. As part of the street closure and parking lot use, the group is also seeking City assistance for providing and placing picnic tables, delivery of requested barricades and trash containers for the event. The applicant has listed the event requirements for these items. The Sheriff's Office has reviewed this application and has indicated that they will assist with any law enforcement concerns that may arise during the block party. The property and business owners along this section of Walnut Street will be required to be contacted about the Block Party. City Council Agenda: 06/12/17 Al. Budget Impact: None. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff impacts are as noted above and include drop-off and pickup of barricades, placement of "No Parking" signage, picnic tables and trash/recycling receptacles. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the Special Event Permit allowing temporary closing of Walnut Street from 7:00 AM until 10:00 PM. on Wednesday, July 12, 2017, including the use of public parking facilities, staff resources and amenities as described in the Special Event Permit application, contingent on: a. Continued site coordination with Street Superintendent. b. Restoration of the Third Street parking lot to satisfaction of Public Works department. C. Verification of notification of affected local businesses by permit holder. 2. Motion to deny the Special Event Permit for temporary closure of Walnut Street and use of public facilities and amenities as described. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 above. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Downtown Block Party Application B. Downtown Block Party Site Plan/Map C. Certificate of Liability Coverage D. Block Party Barricade/Sign Layout 0 F CITY OF MONTICELLO Community Development 505 NA'alnut Street, Suite 1 Special Event Permit Monticeflo Monticello, MN 55362 (763) 295-2711 . znfoA'ci.montice11o.mn.us Application Checklist � PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Address i �.�k�� Property legal Description Property ID Number ' PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Owner Name Owner Address ` Owner Phone } Owner Email j APPLICANT INFORMATION , I Applicant Name j Applicant Address j Applicant PhoneLP _ Applicant Email Name of Event Location/Address of Event ~' vs Dates & Times of Event C�l 1A, I Complete Application Required The review and consideration of an application submitted shall only occur if such application includes all items that are required in support of the application and is deemed complete by the Community Development Department. Application Submission Schedule Application, required information, and payment must be submitted no later than 14 working days prior to desired approval date. Application Information Applicants shall note that special event permits are a zoning permit. Liquor licensing and permitting requires separate review. A special event permit DOES NOT grant or include any liquor license or permit for your event. Please contact the Monticello City Clerk's office regarding liquor licensing and regulations. Sign permits may also be required and are not included within the special event permit application and approval. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment, and/or City property (including rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council. In addition, events which occur after 10 PM may also require review and approval by the City Council as related to noise ordinances. Please provide clear information in the application regarding these requests. 07/24/15 APPLICANT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CITY CHECK-IN CHECK A written narrative including: i 1. A description of the proposed special event, how it will function on the property, hours and dates of operation, and any other information necessary to fully describe the request; and 2. An explanation of how the proposed special event will meet n each of the review criteria specified by code (on reverse), as well as any additional criteria that may apply for the specific use. 3. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment and City property (including rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council A site plan showing all information necessary to accurately depict how the proposed use will function on the site. information required on the site pian shall include but not be limited to: 1. The location of all existing and proposed structures; 2. Driveways and parking areas; /- 3. Proposed storage spaces; 4. Natural features such as woodlands, wetlands, shorelines, etc; 5. Proposed number of parking spaces (if applicable). f i If deemed necessary by the Community Development Department, a survey may be required to be submitted with the application in Y re q addition to a site plan. I Certificate of insurance/liability coverage. � 4 b Electronic copies of all written narratives and plan sets required above. I Application fee of $50.00. Special Event Review Process • The Community Development Department will review all Temporary Use Permit applications. • Applications determined to conform with the approval criteria outlined in Monticello Zoning Code Section 2.4(L)(4)(a) and listed below shall be approved by the Community Development Department with any conditions deemed necessary. A copy of the approved permit shall be provided to the applicant which includes all conditions and comments. • Applications not conforming with the approval criteria outlined in Section 2.4(L)(4)(a) shall be denied by the Community Development Department. • A notice of denial shall be provided to the applicant which includes all identified reasons for denial. Special Event Temporary Use Permit Approval Criteria Approval of a Temporary Use Permit shall only be granted once the Community Development Department has determined the use shall: • Not be detrimental to property or improvements in the surrounding area or to the public health, safety, or general welfare; • Be compatible with the principal uses taking place on the site; • Not have substantial adverse effects or noise impacts on nearby residential neighborhoods; 07/24/15 2 Property Owner's Statement 1 am the fee title owner of the described property and I agree to this application. I certify that I am in compliance with all ordinance requirements and conditions regarding other City approval that have been previously granted. i (Signature) Applicant's Statement (Date) This application shall be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding the application. 1 have completed all of the applicable filing requirements and I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the City Ordinances and current policies related to this I application and that the documents and information I have submitted are true and correct. t (Signature) �W(v r t/ CITY APPROVAL (Zoning Administrator Signature) (Community Development Director Signature) Special Event Permit Approval is granted with the following conditions: Internal review checklist (as applicable): Public Works Routing Law Enforcement Notification City Clerk Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Post -Approval Routing/Requirements Applicant Public Works l Law Enforcement Notification City Clerk I Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Liability Insurance Certificate Received j Surrounding Property Owner Notification Complete (Date) (Date) (Date) Approved ❑ Denied ❑ Admin Parks Streets Director 07/24/15 4 E cu t� C!) , itii) V- \oit vo F ��; r O N 5L % ABMPBOJ13 ■ x" d N06 U �F` ■ a — � ,Q cti w cu a '�, O ■ IV LL ccs U vi N t°i N Q ■ CU cr C:) Nip ■ Off- vv pp cv J M / V 1 v'•- ■ t�■ o �,� )Meo ■ (Dm ■ ■ _ N i Q1 Q L � L. LU■ Q w ca m NLL (6 N v v m Z■ � m N O pC d Q■ tl LU t w N LU CD Ca M �� YD N E W CU C N ■ to y$ 3: a) LL (DLL' C/)L. CD co■ C0 cn :rZp 4- -W CO)L■ M + . _ C ■ a~i ° U ■ (aQ 06 O ■ >, v ■ 0 06■cu O�c ■3 m m a) ■ 00 �0 m ■ C: .�' ■ toi - -� ) ■ (� W ■ ■ r_.� �aa.��s p,� �►�-40 �06 +- a> C:) C: =3 T- 2 cy 0 0 m (1) CN 'T- .Q N O � ���� U) U O A. -A -0-0 C -4--j a) O O xx 00 N T— C 00 in 5L / Aempeoas a� a U-I.-& a) cn 'c Z C U a) o Z cn L O U > 00 U auoZ 6uipeol Aally uieal aagwego < w 0 �. m` o< 0 o a��o o ....... ti . 3323 ■ (` `7 ,r1 IrfL— ■ cc ■Y � w co E �L ■ cu ■ N _ m tD ■(� L L�c� ■, m v w Ca cu w ■ oiro ■ �� 00 ■ ■ N71 1 ■ 11 40ei4a S'i p m u cn a) L EO N 1, cu U cn U) C:cr V/ U cu I-- m a)cn -0 =3J o 0 ■ Q Beverage Sales a� FEZ 0 0 LL C� wowntown Block Party Information Sheet Date: Wednesday, July 12th 2017 Attachments provided: Time: 4:30PM - 9:OOPIVI Layout of Block Party Place: On Walnut Street between Broadway & 3rd Certificate of Insurance - Event On business properties in that area. Certificate of Insurance - Liquor On the 3rd street public parking lot See attached map. Overview: The Downtown Block Party is being sponsored by all interested downtown and Chamber businesses. This event is being sponsored by the Chamber of Commerce. It is open to the public and is with the purpose of promotinq the downtown area, bringing awareness to the public of all of the businesses located downtown and as a way to bring the community together for a day of inexpensive fun. Insurance Information: Event Insurance - Insurance for the event has been secured through the sponsorship of the Monticello Chamber of Commerce and Foster White Insurance Agency. The City of Monticello has been named as additional insured on the policy See attached event insurance information. Liquor Service & Insurance - The Monticello Lions will be serving tap beer at the event. They will be in charge of the sale of beer at the event. We have secured one officer from the Wright County Sherrif's Office as well as two reserves who will be on-site from 4:30-9:OOpm The Monticello Lion's have a liquor license, and liquor liability insurance which will name The City of Monticello as additional insured for this event. See attached licenses and insurance information. Street & Parkinq Lot Closinq Information: We are requesting the temporary closing the Walnut Street between Broadway & 3rd Street on Wednesday, July 12th from 7AM - 10:00 PM. We are also requesting temporary NO PARKING signs be posted on both sides of Walnut Street between Broadway and 3rd Streets on Tuesday, July 11th to begin at 8 PM through 7AM. This will ensure that their will not be any parked cars in the area at 7AM Wed. We are putting a 30x40 tent in the parking lot located on the corner of 3rd & Walnut St. (see layout). This tent would be used for food & beverage sales and for shaded seating. This tent would beset up by General Rental on Tuesday, July 11th and will betaken be taken down by General Rental on Thursday, July 13th 2015. It will require 12 stakes to be drilled into the parking lot. These holes will be plugged by General Rental at the time of the tent removal. City Equipment and Assistance Requested: See attached site snap for details, Assistance We are asking the city for assistance in the following ways - Place as ;ndicated the f%J VV J ,, ,temc No Parking Signs on Walnut by 8PM on Tue. 7/11/17 Street barricades 7 AM on Wed. 7112/17 Barricades on Tue. 7/11/17 around area of parking lot where the tent will be set up. Trash cans 11 AM on Wed. 7/12/17 Cones 11 AM on Wed. 7/12/17 Pedestrian crossing markers 11 AM on Wed. 7/12/17 Picnic tables 11 ANI on Wed. 7/12/17 Secure permission to place a black sign on the grassy area in front of the water treatment plant on East Broadway. (no assistance needed -just permission) Equipment (10) Trash Cans (25) Picnic Tables (20) orange cones (4) Stop for Pedestrians in Cross Walk Signs (if available) No Parking Signs Street Barricades Walnut Street at Broadway Walnut Street at 3rd Street East end of alley (2) entrances to 3rd st. parking lot Area around tent set-up in parking lot a5�0812a17 OP ID: JK s CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE � DATE s12 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder Is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(les) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder In lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT NAME: Foster White Agency, Inc. PHONE FAX 114 West 3rd Street -W9 N0-9Xt1:---------------------- -- -- — - - -- -- -- - I (A1C, --- Monticello, MN 55352 E-MAIL - - ADDRESS: Jake Olinger PRODUCER MONTI-4 CUSTOMER ID - --- INSURER(S) AFFORDING -COVERAGE- ------ - NAIC i ----------- ---- — INSURED Monticello Chamber of Commerce INSURER A: West Bend Mutual insurance Co 1.15350 PO Box 192 INSURER s Monticello, MN 55362 -- INSURER C INSURER D: INSURER E : - - --------- - - - ---- -- - --- - - - - -- - ---- ---- ----- — - - - INSURER F COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR I i ADDL SUBIR POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LTA TYPE OF INSURANCE MR WVD POLICY NUMBER (MMIDDIYYYY) (MMIDDNYYY) LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY I EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY NSO 1078042 04/2012017 04/2012018 _ ._-__... A A�c�'n'ni~1�`I`�'---------- $ 100,000 - PREMISES (Ea occurrence) CLAIMS -MADE X OCCUR I MED EXP ;Any one person) $ 55,000 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY$ 1,000,000 d'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRO- X i POLICYF-111 ,II�Ci i LOC �j AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY Ai1TO ALL 0WNED A U 7 0 S SCHEDULED AUTOS A X j HIRED AUTOS A i X i KION -OWNED AUTOS NSO 1078042 NS O 1078042 UMBRELLALIAB-- i OCCUR EXCESS LIAR i CLAIMS -MADE A ;---} - - ------- ---L-------- - j NUO 2097834 DEDIJC':'IBLE RETENTION WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y t N r i - is vc 04120/2017 04/20/2018 04120/2017 04120/2018 04/2012017 04/20/2018 GENERAL AGGREGATE I $ 2,000,000 PRODUCTS- COMPIOP AGG I $ 2,000,000 I$ COMBiNED SINGLE LIMJ I $ 1,000,000 (Ea accident; BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ BODILY INJURY (Per accident)-$- ---------- ---_....... _............................- - PROPERTY DAMAGE ..._... - - ---- ................ $ - (PER ACCIDENT) EACH OCCURRENCE ($ AGGREGATE ($ C?TH `NC STA.TU- - T 0 R Y L MTS n E A N 7 PROPR:ETORIPARI-r ,x P•lE,�:_.CUTIVE -- � E.L. EACH ACCIDDN'T $ OFFICERIMEMBER EXCLUDED'? N i A 1 (Mandatory In NH) -- f Fs, describe under E.L.E DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ DSCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS be1c. v I E.L. DISEASE.- POLICY LIrAH A +D & O Liability NNO 1088832 04/2012017 04/2012018 (Aggregate DESCRIPTION S�OF OPERATIONS 1 LOCATIONS i VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, If more space is required) Lla'bi�ity w1ig?''IlO 1$arty $11S 1gn Additional Insured in respect to General CERTIFICATE HOLDER CITYMON City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 CANCELLATION 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Jake Olinger O 1988-2009 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2009/09) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD PIP t f Jr 4V ilzIce� c"� o ? µ = o . Aw1 91r/, e -. '=* o L o -o •`� � � �d i O i ti �J � 5 ` ' _rQD 2015 Coocgle ' 0001C Your GuideF 1991 Im ew gate: a"23"2(-)12 1Y'l8'19 90" N 93'47'41.84" W elev- 924 ft eve alt 1 City Council Agenda: 06/12/17 2G. Consideration to approve a Special Event Permit allowing use of Ellison Park and related assistance in coniunction with Art in the Park/Taste of Monticello on Saturday. Julv 15, 2017. Applicant: Monticello Chamber of Commerce (JS/PW) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to consider approval of the use of Ellison Park, as well as related City assistance for park set-up, for the Art in the Park and the Taste of Monticello event. The event is coordinated by the Monticello Chamber of Commerce and is proposed to occur on Saturday, July 15, 2017. The event hours are 8 AM — 3 PM. However, the Chamber of Commerce is requesting use of the park beginning at 5:00 AM. Although the narrative does not request tear - down time after 3:00 PM, that time is customarily accounted for as part of event approval. As such, the event approval would allow use of the park for this event from 5:00 AM — 5:00 PM. The Chamber noted that some vendors choose to set up the night before, however, it is at their own risk. The Chamber has indicated that it will be responsible for set-up and tear -down related to the event, and will provide required portable satellites and waste disposal services. The Chamber covers a portion of the cost of those facilities for this event, although they will already be in place as part of the Riverfest event. The Sheriff's Office has reviewed this application and has indicated that Art in the Park has hired an off-duty deputy to assist with any law enforcement concerns that may arise in the park. Parking and the additional traffic in town will be handled with the on -duty Monticello deputies. The Chamber will also coordinate with the Sheriff's Department for traffic control and security purposes. City Public Works staff have previously been involved with assisting in park preparation. The request is to allow such assistance, along with waiver of park rental fee to continue for 2017. Al. Budget Impact: There is the potential for a minor loss of revenue for park rental for the date Art in the Park/Taste of Monticello occurs at Ellison. No other budget impact is anticipated. A2. Staff Workload Impact: The Parks Department staff will assist during the week prior to the event preparing for this activity, in addition to other Riverfest activities planned for Ellison Park. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the Special Event Permit allowing use of Ellison Park and related assistance in conjunction with the Art in the Park/Taste of the Town celebration on July 15, 2017. City Council Agenda: 06/12/17 2. Motion to deny the Special Event Permit. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff supports Alternative #1 in favor of the Special Event permit for Art in the Park/Taste of Monticello. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Art in the Park/Taste of Monticello Narrative B. Art in the Park/Taste of Monticello Maps C. Certificate of Liability Insurance 2 71 CITYg OF MonticeHo CITE' OF MONT'ICELLO Community Development 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 (763) 295-2711 o infona,ci.monticello.mn.us i Property Address Property Legal Description Property ID Number Owner Name Owner Address Owner Phone Owner Email Applicant Name Applicant Address Applicant Phone Applicant Email Name of Event Location/Address of Event Dates & Times of Event Special Event Permit Application Checklist PROPERTY INFORMATION R i k I 1 X11 �,5�>�n 4�Ck.r1�. PROPERTY OWNER INFORdAATIQN �1y i , 'o.0 APPLICANT INFORMATION I i*A ULv. 100 AvWMoIC Cq� -. �p QA V� �-InP � � }Q io IS31 'Ri k' ^Wor blovI Complete Application Required The review and consideration of an application submitted shall only occur if such application includes all items that are required in support of the application and is deemed complete by the Community Development Department. Application Submission Schedule Application, required information, and payment must be submitted no later than 14 working days prior to desired approval date. Application Information Applicants shall note that special event permits are a zoning permit. Liquor licensing and permitting requires separate review. A special event permit DOES NOT grant or include any liquor license or permit for your event. Please contact the Monticello City Clerk's office regarding liquor licensing and regulations. Sign permits may also be required and are not included within the special event permit application and approval. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment, and/or City property (including rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council. In addition, events which occur after 10 PM may also require review and approval by the City Council as related to noise ordinances. Please provide clear information in the application regarding these requests. 07/24/15 1 APPUCAWT APPLICATION SU'BMI'TTAL REQUIREMENTS CITY CHECK-IN A written narrative including: 1. A description of the proposed special event, hove it will function on the property, hours and dates of operation, and any other ��' information necessary to fully describe the request; and 2. An explanation of how the proposed special event will meet d each of the review criteria specified by code (on reverse), as well as any additional criteria that may apply for the specific use. 3. Any requested use of City facilities, City staff resources, City equipment and City property (including rights of way) and/or any requested waiver of application fee or park rental fees requires review and approval by the City Council A site plan showing all information necessary to accurately depict how the proposed use will function on the site. Information required on the site plan shall include but not be limited to: 1. The location of all existing and proposed structures; ,,- 2. Driveways and parking areas; 3. Proposed storage spaces; 4. Natural features such as woodlands, wetlands, shorelines, etc; 5. Proposed number of parking spaces (if applicable). If deemed necessary by the Community Development Department, a survey may be required to be submitted with the application in addition to a site plan. '~ Certificate of insurance/liability coverage. Electronic copies of all written narratives and plan sets required above. a Application fee of $50.00. SpecEai Evert Review Process The Community Development Department will review all Temporary Use Permit applications. Applications determined to conform with the approval criteria outlined in Monticello Zoning Code Section 2.4(L)(4)(a) and listed below shall be approved by the Community Development Department with any conditions deemed necessary. A copy of the approved permit shall be provided to the applicant which includes all conditions and comments. o Applications not conforming with the approval criteria outlined in Section 2.4(L)(4)(a) shall be dented by the Community Development Department. A notice` of denial shall be provided to the applicant which includes all identified reasons for denial. SpecW Event 1`emporary Use Permit Approval Criteria Approval of a Temporary Use Permit shall only be granted once the Community Development Department has determined the use shall: o Not be detrimental to property or improvements in the surrounding area or to the public health, safety, or general welfare; • Be compatible with the principal uses taking place on the site; o Not have substantial adverse effects or noise impacts on nearby residential neighborhoods; 07/24/15 2 Special, Event Ternporar�e Use Permit Approval Criteria, coat. o Not include permanent alterations to the site; • Not maintain temporary signs associated with the use or structure after the activity ends; o Not violate the applicable conditions of approval that apply to a site or use on the site; • Not interfere with the normal operations of any permanent use located on the property; and • Contain sufficient land area to allow the temporary use, structure, or special event to occur, as well as adequate land to accommodate the parking and traffic movement associated with the temporary use, without disturbing environmentally sensitive lands. • Not create an unreasonable risk of significant: 1. Damage to public or private property, beyond normal wear and tear; 2. Injury to persons; 3. Public or private disturbances or nuisances; 4. Unsafe impediments or distractions to, or congestion of, vehicular or pedestrian travel; 5. Additional and impracticable or unduly burdensome police, fire, trash removal, maintenance, or other public services demands; and 6. Other adverse effects upon the public health, safety, or welfare. The special event shall not be of such a nature, size, or duration that the particular location requested cannot reasonably accommodate the event. The special event shall not conflict with another permitted special event at the same location in a manner that will negatively impact the public health, welfare, or safety. Special Event Temporary Use Permit Conditions of Approval In approving the Temporary Use Permit for the special event, the Community Development Department is authorized to impose such conditions upon the issuance of the permit as may be necessary to reduce or minimize any potential adverse impacts upon other property in the area, as long as the condition relates to a situation created or aggravated by the proposed special event. The Community Development Department is authorized, where appropriate, to require: 1. Provision of temporary parking facilities, including vehicular access and egress. 2. Control of nuisance factors, such as but not limited to, the prevention of glare or direct illumination of adjacent properties, noise, vibrations, smoke, dust, dirt, odors, gases, and heat. 3. Regulation of temporary buildings, structures and facilities, including placement, height and size, location of equipment and open spaces, including buffer areas and other yards. 4. Provision of sanitary and medical facilities. 5. Provision of solid waste collection and disposal. 6. Provision of security and safety measures. 7. Use of an alternative location or date for the proposed special event. 8. Modification or elimination of certain proposed activities. 9. Regulation of operating hours and days, including limitation of the duration of the special event to a shorter time period than that requested or specified in this subsection. 10. Submission of a performance guarantee to ensure that any temporary facilities or structures used for such proposed special event will be removed from the site within a reasonable time following the event and that the property will be restored to its former condition. A temporary use permit for a special event authorized in accordance with this subsection shall be limited to a maximum duration of 14 days per site per calendar year, unless otherwise specifically authorized by the Community Development Department. 07/24/15 Property Owner's Statement I am the fee title owner of the described property and I agree to this application. I certify that I am in compliance with all ordinance requirements and conditions regarding other City approval that have been previously granted. (Signature) (Date) Applicant's Statement This application shall be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding the application. I have completed all of the applicable filing requirements and I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the City Ordinances and current policies related to this application and that the documents and information I have submitted are true and correct. (SignatureN k A A A 11 Aym A CITY APPROVAL (Zoning Administrator Signature) (Community Development Director Signature) Special Event Permit Approval is granted with the following conditions: Internal review checklist (as applicable): Public Works Routing Law Enforcement Notification City Clerk Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Post -Approval Routing/Requirements Applicant Public Works Law Enforcement Notification City Clerk Monticello Community Center Room/Park Reservations Liability Insurance Certificate Received Surrounding Property Owner Notification Complete ,o.«, Mn,��2on (Date) (Date) Approved ❑ 1 Denied ❑ i Admin Parks Streets Director 07/24/15 4 0 0 U On IV L- 0 0 LU CL CC (V u c .0 uj u u cr- cr- 0 LU E 70 L14 WASHINGTON AVE. Ln r" m Lol m 1 19 r- m T-1 00 r,14 cn V-1 r-4 1;41 0 0) r%4 m W -A r -A CO) r"i co N M m r-_ C14 m Q;j- w r,-4 m Ln Ln r1i m w qt r14 m m m r14 m rlj I M ME qzt lo It* t.0 00 I cn Ln m 00 � Ln CD r - Ln Ln 01 LU LU L/) U z < V) cr- F- ur) I Ex F- LU ;:- LL: Lu co u X z 0 r-4 uj CCV) LL ki. 0 LL F - < > LL LU u O cr_l 0 qzt lo It* t.0 00 I cn Ln m 00 � Ln CD r - Ln Ln 01 LU LU L/) U z < V) cr- F- ur) I Ex F- LU ;:- LL: Lu co F, w • 41 n U OP ID: JK CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCEDATE(MMIDDIYYYY) 0510812017 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES 3ELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder Is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(les) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder In lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT NAME: Foster White Agency, Inc. PHONE FAX 114 West 3rd Street No. Ext:-- _ [AIC, Not: Monticello, MN 55362 EADDRESS: Jake Olinger PRODUCER MONTI-0 CUSTOMER ID is DESCRIPTION nOtF OPERATIONS i 1LnOCA�TIONS II�VtEHIICLES (Attach ACO RD 149, Addlgonal Remarks Schedule, It mon specs Is nquhneco LityQf RBi�1RJQrI the f�arkRIl16117dditional Insured in respect to General CERTIFICATE HOLDER CITYMON City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Jake Olinger Q 1988-2009 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2009109) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD INSURERS) AFFORDING COVERAGE E NAIC J INSURED Monticello Chamber of Commerce INSURER A: West Bend Mutual Insurance Co 115350 B Ix 192 NSURER B: Mo cello, MN 55362 INSURER C: !� ` I [NSURER D: INSURER E: INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFYTHAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REOUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT LIR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONSAND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES, LIMITS SHOWN MAY WAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. [NSR AUUL *U5K LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE INSR 5MV0 POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF POLICY EXP [MM1DDlYYYY1 [MM[ODIYWYI LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY X NSO 1078042 ENT ED 04/20/2017 04120/2018 i PREMISES (Ee occurrence) $ 100,000 CLAIMS -MADE FX -1 OCCUR MED EXP (Any one person) $ 5,000 I� jPERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 1, 2,000,000 GENT AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS- COMPIOP AG $ 1 n $ X POLICY )ECT LOC AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 1000,000 ANY AUTO (Es accident) BODfLY INJURY {Par person) ' $ ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ SCHEDULED AUTOS PROPERTY DAMAGE $ A X ' HIRED AUTOS NSO 1078042 04120/2017 0412012018 IPER ACCIDENT) A X NON -OWNED AUTOS NSO 1078042 04/20/2017 0412012018 $ y�y 3 $ X UMBRELLA LIAR OCCUR EAGH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 EXCESS LIAO HCLAIMSA •MADE AGGREGATE $ 1, 000,00o- NU02097834 04120!2017 04!20!201$ ------ DEDUCTIBLE �I $ RETENTION $ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION WCSTATU- OTH- TORY LIMITS ER AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY YIN ANY PRUPRIET^RIPARTNERIE7(EL'UTIVE j j N f A E.L. EACH ACO?D[NY $ OFPICERIMEMBER E(CLUDED'r I EMPLOYEE IMandetory In NH) E.L. DI SEASE - EA $ Ityyes,describeunder r DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS belcw E.L. DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT $ A D & O Liability NNO 1088832 0412012017 04/2012018[Aggregate 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION nOtF OPERATIONS i 1LnOCA�TIONS II�VtEHIICLES (Attach ACO RD 149, Addlgonal Remarks Schedule, It mon specs Is nquhneco LityQf RBi�1RJQrI the f�arkRIl16117dditional Insured in respect to General CERTIFICATE HOLDER CITYMON City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Jake Olinger Q 1988-2009 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2009109) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD City Council Agenda: 6/12/17 211. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 668 amending Title 3, Chapter 3, Section 5 — Municipal Liquor Store A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to adopt an ordinance which provides for changes to the City's liquor ordinance. The current ordinance is outdated and needed correction. Further, the amendment accommodates recent changes to the Minnesota Statutes related to when intoxicating liquor may be sold. As of July 1, 2017 State Law allows for the off -sale of intoxicating liquor on Sunday's between the hours of 11 a.m. and 6 p.m. City staff consulted with the City Attorney and it was determined that the changes in the document follow State Statute. Al. Budget Impact: There will be minimal cost for publishing the summary ordinance amendments. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff time to prepare and update the City Ordinances. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Approve Ordinance 668 amending Title 3, Chapter 3, Section 5 — Municipal Liquor Ordinance. 2. Deny the ordinance amendment. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Draft Ordinance 668 1 ORDINANCE 668 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 3, CHAPTER 3, SECTION 5 - MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORES HOURS OF OPERATION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Title 3, Chapter 3, Section 5, Hours of Operation, is hereby amended by adding the underlined lanauaae and removing the stfi ,ethr-et language as follows : Apik 7-1 3-3-5 HOURS OF OPERATION: upen the hours of opefations. "�a�ntexieating liquor ohall be made any moi; e 3:00 p o*-->i�l TDez.,,7 No "on oalo" zhall bo ma silo" shall be mado on Thankogivi ig Day, Christ as Day ,. -,,,, a I I .,, , 10 evzvx�xN Feeed ng sueh days, if the sale ; of ;bite , eff salo nvyjae mado until 19:00.x. 1"qThe ours o4weration daff sale shall be thosi by Minnesota Statutes Cs,hapter 340Js it mavWrJffded from timeiM tinJexcent that the Citt_wWouncil may, by ordinance or resolution provide for m7ore res tT tive hours. SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and publication, ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council the 12th day of June, 2017. Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, Administrator AYES: NAYS: Council Agenda: 06/12/17 2I. Consideration of Resolution 2017-23 calling a Public hearing granting Dreliminary approval for the issuance of conduit revenue bonds for the benefit of the SRCS Building Companv (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: What is Conduit Financing? Conduit financing is a financing mechanism for private companies, non -profits and public authorities that funds projects through the issuance of tax-exempt municipal bonds. These are essentially revenue bonds and are also known as conduit, private activity or pass-through bonds. Conduit financing supports projects as varied as hospitals, universities, public works, housing and industrial development. In this case, using the city as conduit, the SRCS Building Company (Swan River Montessori Charter School) is refinancing debt incurred for school improvements. Issuer and Borrower Conduit bonds are issued by a governmental entity, which is known as the conduit issuer, The taxes, fees or revenues that secure the bonds are collected by the conduit issuer from the borrower and then paid to the bondholders. However, the conduit issuer is generally not responsible for repayment. With conduit financing, the borrowing organization is obligated to repay interest and principal on the bonds, unless otherwise agreed to by the parties. So, if a local non-profit hospital wants to build a new surgery center and uses conduit financing to fund the project, it is the non-profit hospital, not the conduit issuer, that is responsible for debt repayment. Impact on City Conduit debt counts against the annual bank qualification limit of $10,000,000 but not against the small issuer limit of $5,000,000. Certain tax benefits flow to banks who buy debt from municipalities who issue less than $10,000,000 in one year. These tax benefits create more demand for the debt and consequently lower interest rates. The small issuer limit allows the city to avoid costly IRS arbitrage compliance requirements. Arbitrage is related to the investment of debt proceeds, specifically where interest received exceeds interest paid (yield). The city plans to issue $5,000,000 or less in 2017. Al. Budget Impact: All costs excluding clerical staff duties are covered by the borrower. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Requires staff to coordinate and record council action. A3. Legal Review: Kennedy and Graven are processing the refinancing. Council Agenda: 06/12/17 B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve Resolution 2017-23 calling a public hearing granting preliminary approval for the issuance of conduit revenue bonds for the benefit of the SRCS Building Company. 2. Motion to deny Resolution 2017-23 calling a public hearing granting preliminary approval for the issuance of conduit revenue bonds for the benefit of the SRCS Building Company. 3. Other C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City Staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Draft Resolution 2017-23 B. Kennedy and Graven Letter C. Financing Schedule 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-23 RESOLUTION CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING AND GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR THE ISSUANCE OF CONDUIT REVENUE BONDS FOR THE BENEFIT OF SRCS BUILDING COMPANY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Monticello (the "City") as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.1655, as amended (the "Act"), the City is authorized to issue revenue obligations to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, the cost of the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, improvement, betterment, or extension of a "project," defined in the Act, in part, as any properties, real or personal, used or useful in connection with a revenue producing enterprise. 1.02. SRCS Building Company, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the `Borrower"), has proposed that the City issue its revenue obligations, in one or more series (the "Note"), in the approximate aggregate principal amount of $2,300,000. The proceeds of the Note are proposed to be loaned by the City to the Borrower to be applied by the Borrower, along with equity of the Borrower, to (i) refinance outstanding taxable debt of the Borrower which previously financed the acquisition, construction and equipping of the public charter school buildings and related facilities located at 411, 500, and 503 Maple Street in the City (collectively, the "School Facilities"); (ii) finance certain capital improvements to the School Facilities; and (iii) pay the costs of issuance of the Note (the "Project"). The School Facilities are owned by the Borrower and are leased to Swan River Montessori Charter School, or any of its affiliates, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation and public charter school ("the School"), for the operation of a preschool and elementary school. 1.03. Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and regulations promulgated thereunder, requires that prior to the issuance of the Note, the Council approve the Note after conducting a public hearing thereon. Section 469.154, subdivision 4, of the Act requires that prior to submitting an application to the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development ("DEED") for approval of the Project, the Council must conduct a public hearing on the proposal to undertake projects authorized to be financed under the terms of the Act. 1.04. The Borrower has requested that the Council conduct a public hearing on Monday, July 10, 2017, to provide approval to the issuance of the Note, pursuant to the requirements of the Act and the Code and regulations promulgated thereunder. Pursuant to 500914v1 GAF MN190-155 Section 147(f) of the Code, the Council must conduct a public hearing after one publication of notice in a newspaper circulating generally in the City at least fourteen (14) days before the hearing. Under Section 469.154, subdivision 4 of the Act, a public hearing must be held after one publication of notice in the official newspaper and a newspaper circulating generally in the City at least fourteen (14) days before the hearing. Section 2. Preliminary Findings. Based on representations made by the Borrower to the City to date, the City Council hereby makes the following preliminary findings, determinations, and declarations: (a) It is hereby found and determined that the Project furthers the purposes set forth in the Act, and the Project constitutes a "project" within the meaning of Section 469.153, subdivision 2(b) of the Act. (b) The proceeds of the Note will be loaned to the Borrower and the proceeds of the loan will be applied to finance the Project. The City will enter into a loan agreement (or other revenue agreement) with the Borrower requiring loan repayments from the Borrower in amounts sufficient to repay the loan of the proceeds of the Note when due and requiring the Borrower to pay all costs of maintaining and insuring the School Facilities, including taxes thereon. (c) In preliminarily authorizing the issuance of the Note and the financing of the Project, the City's purpose is to further the policies of the Act. (d) The Note will be a special, limited obligation of the City payable solely from the revenues pledged to the payment thereof, and will not be a general or moral obligation of the City and will not be secured by or payable from revenues derived from any exercise of the taxing powers of the City. Section 3. Public Hearing. The Council shall meet at 6:30 P.M. on Monday, July 10, 2017, to conduct a public hearing on the Project and the issuance of the Note by the City, notice of such hearing (the "Public Notice") will be published as required by Section 469.154, subdivision 4 of the Act and Section 147(f) of the Code. The City Clerk of the City is hereby authorized and directed to publish the Public Notice, in substantially the form attached hereto as EXHIBIT A, in the Monticello Times, a newspaper of general circulation in the City, at least fourteen (14) days before the meeting of the Council at which the public hearing will take place. At the public hearing reasonable opportunity will be provided for interested individuals to express their views, both orally and in writing, on the Project and the proposed issuance of the Note. Section 4. Preliminary Approval. The Council hereby states its preliminary intention to issue the Note in the approximate aggregate principal amount of $2,300,000 to finance the Project and the costs of issuance of the Note. The Note shall not constitute a charge, lien, or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City except the City's interest in the loan or revenue agreement with respect to 500914v1 GAF MN190-155 2 the Note and the Project, and the Note, when, as, and if issued, shall recite in substance that the Note, including interest thereon, is payable solely from the revenues received from the Project and property pledged to the payment thereof, and shall not constitute a general or moral obligation of the City. Section 5. Submission of Project to DEED. Pursuant to Section 469.154 of the Act, prior to the issuance of the Note by the City, the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development ("DEED") must approve the costs of the Project to be funded by the Note on the basis of an application submitted by the City with all required attachments and exhibits (the "DEED Application"). In accordance with Section 469.154 of the Act, the City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to cause a draft copy of the DEED Application, together with drafts of all required attachments and exhibits, to be prepared by Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, as bond counsel ("Bond Counsel"). The DEED Application, together with all attachments and exhibits, shall be made available for public inspection in the office of the City Administrator during regular business hours of the City. The City Administrator and other officers, employees, attorneys, and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide DEED with any information needed for this purpose, and the City Administrator is authorized to initiate and assist in the preparation of such documents as may be appropriate to the Project. Section 6. Approval of Bond Counsel. The law firm of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, is authorized to act as Bond Counsel and to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to the Project and the Note issued in connection therewith. The Mayor, City Administrator, and other officers, employees, and agents of the City are hereby authorized to assist Bond Counsel in the preparation of such documents. Section 7. City's Costs. The Borrower will pay any administrative fees of the City and pay, or, upon demand, reimburse the City for payment of, any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the Project and the issuance of the Note, whether or not the Note is issued. Section 8. Commitment Conditional. The adoption of this resolution does not constitute a guaranty or firm commitment that the City will issue the Note as requested by the Borrower. The City retains the right in its sole discretion to withdraw from participation and accordingly not to issue the Note, or issue the Note in an amount less than the amount referred to herein, should the City at any time prior to issuance thereof determine that it is in the best interest of the City not to issue the Note, or to issue the Note in an amount less than the amount referred to in Section 1.02 hereof, or should the parties to the transaction be unable to reach agreement as to the terms and conditions of any of the documents required for the transaction. Section 9. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. 500914v1 GAF MN190-155 3 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota this 12th day of June, 2017. Mayor Attest: City Administrator 500914v1 GAF MN190-155 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF MONTICELLO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO BE CONDUCTED BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO WITH RESPECT TO A PROJECT DESCRIBED IN MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTIONS 469.152 THROUGH 469.1655 AND THE ISSUANCE OF CONDUIT REVENUE BONDS FOR THE BENEFIT OF SRCS BUILDING COMPANY NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City") will hold a public hearing on Mississippi Room at the Community Center, 505 Walnut Avenue in the City, at or after 6:30 p.m. on Monday, July 10, 2017 to consider a proposal for the issuance of one or more revenue obligations (the "Note") of the City pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.1655, as amended (the "Act"), on behalf of SRCS Building Company, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the "Borrower"). The proceeds of the Note proposed to be issued by the City will be applied to the following purposes: (i) refinance outstanding taxable debt of the Borrower which previously financed the acquisition, construction and equipping of the public charter school buildings and related facilities located at 411, 500, and 503 Maple Street in the City (collectively, the "School Facilities"); (ii) finance certain capital improvements to the School Facilities; and (iii) pay the costs of issuance of the Note (the "Project"). The School Facilities are owned by the Borrower and are leased to Swan River Montessori Charter School, or any of its affiliates, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation and public charter school ("the School"), for the operation of a preschool and elementary school. Following the public hearing, the City Council will consider the adoption of a resolution approving the Project and giving approval to the issuance of the Note. The aggregate face amount of the Note proposed to be issued to finance the Project is presently estimated not to exceed $2,300,000 and may be issued in one or more series. The Note to be issued by the City will constitute a special, limited obligation of the City payable solely from the revenues expressly pledged to the payment thereof, will not be a general or moral obligation of the City and will not be secured by the taxing power of the City or any assets or property of the City except any interests of the City in the Project that may be granted to the City in conjunction with this financing. All interested persons may appear and be heard at the time and place set forth above. A draft copy of the proposed application to the Department of Employment and Economic Development for approval of the Project, together with all attachments and exhibits, shall be available for public inspection following the publication of this notice, at City Hall during normal business hours. Dated: [Date of Publication] 500914v1 GAF MN190-155 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA /s/ City Clerk 500914v1 GAF MN190-155 u ® Offices in 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis Minneapolis, MN 55402 Saint Paul (612) 337-9300 telephone (612) 337-9310 fax St. Cloud www.kennedy-graven.com C H A R T E R E D Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity Employer GINA A. FIORINI Attorney at Law Direct Dial (612) 337-9210 Email: gfiorini@kennedy-graven.com June 7, 2017 Wayne Oberg Finance Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, Minnesota 55362 Re: Resolution providing preliminary approval for the issuance of the conduit revenue obligation proposed to be issued by the City of Monticello for the benefit of SRCS Building Company Dear Wayne, As you know, SRCS Building Company, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the "Borrower") has requested that the City issue its conduit revenue obligation in the approximate aggregate principal amount of $2,300,000 (the "Note"), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.1655, as amended (the "Act"). The City Council is being asked to adopt the attached resolution on Monday, June 12, 2017, which provides preliminary approval for the issuance of the Note and calls for a public hearing to be conducted on Monday, July 10, 2017. If the City agrees to issue the Note, the Borrower will use the proceeds of the Note to (i) refinance outstanding taxable debt of the Borrower which previously financed the acquisition, renovation, construction and equipping of the public charter school buildings and related facilities located at 411, 500, and 503 Maple Street in the City (collectively, the "School Facilities"); (ii) finance certain capital improvements to the School Facilities; and (iii) pay the costs of issuance of the Note (the "Project"). The Borrower will own the Project and will lease it to Swan River Montessori Charter School, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation ("Swan River"), for the operation of a preschool and an elementary school. The Borrower will enter into a lease agreement with Swan River. The Note is proposed to be privately placed with Sherburne State Bank (the "Lender"). If the Note is authorized to be issued by the City Council, it will be issued as a conduit revenue bond secured solely by the revenues derived from a loan agreement (the "Loan Agreement') to be executed by the City and the Borrower and from other security provided by the Borrower. The Note will not constitute a general or moral obligation of the City and will not be secured by or payable from any property or assets of the City (other than the interests of the City in the Loan Agreement) and will not be secured by any taxing power of the City. The Note will not be subject to any debt limitation imposed on the City and the issuance of the Note will not have any adverse impact on the credit rating of the City, even in the event that Borrower encounters financial difficulties with respect to the Project to be financed with the proceeds of the Note. 501014v1 GAF MN190-155 Wayne Oberg, Finance Director City of Monticello June 7, 2017 Page 2 of 2 The Note is proposed to be issued as a tax-exempt obligation, the interest on which is not includable in gross income for federal income tax purposes. Tax-exempt obligations are usually not eligible for purchase by banks and other financial institutions, but Section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), permits each issuer of tax-exempt obligations to designate up to $10,000,000 of tax-exempt bonds as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" (sometimes referred to as "bank -qualified bonds") that are eligible for purchase by banks and other financial institutions. In order to issue bank -qualified bonds, the issuer must not expect to issue more than $10,000,000 of bonds (other than private activity bonds that are not qualified 501(c)(3) bonds) in a calendar year. The Borrower has requested that the City designate the Note as a qualified tax-exempt obligation for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code. Under the terms of the Loan Agreement, the Borrower will pay all of the City's fees and expenses. If the City adopts the enclosed resolution, the City Council will be asked to conduct a public hearing as required by the Act and the Code on July 10, 2017. Following the public hearing, the City Council will be asked to consider a resolution providing final approval to the Project and the issuance of the Note and authorizing the execution of documents in connection therewith. I will attend the City Council meeting on June 12, 2017, and can answer any questions that may arise during the meeting. Please contact me with any questions you may have prior to the City Council meeting. Sincerely, a A. Fiorini 5010141 GAF MN190-155 $2,200,000 City of Monticello, Minnesota Educational Facilities Revenue Note (Swan River Montessori Charter School Project) Series 2017 Financing Schedule Due Date Required Action Responsible Partv Week of June 1, Send resolution calling public hearing to working group K&G; Borrower 2017 for review; send tax due diligence questionnaire to Borrower Monday, June 12, City Council considers resolution calling public hearing City (K&G and 2017 Borrower to attend) By June 19, 2017 Arrange publication of notice of public hearing in K&G Monticello Times (official newspaper of City) Week of June 19, DEED application circulated to working group for review K&G 2017 June 22, 2017 Notice of public hearing published in Monticello Times K&G (must be published at least 14 days prior to hearing) Week of June 25, Send loan documents and note resolution to working K&G 2017 group for review July 10, 2017 Public Hearing Conducted; City Council considers note City (K&G and resolution providing approval to issue note Borrower to attend) Week of July 10, Following public hearing, send DEED application to State K&G 2017 for approval (must have approval prior to closing) Two Weeks Prior to Closing certificates distributed to working group for K&G Closing review , 2017 Closing City of Monticello, Minnesota (City) SRCS Building Company (Borrower) Swan River Montessori Charter School (School) Kennedy & Graven, Chartered (K&G) Sherburne State Bank (Lender) All City Council Agenda: 06/12/17 2J. Consideration to renew membership in the MN Public Broadband Alliance for 2017 at a cost of $1,500 (JO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Council is asked to consider funding membership in the MN Public Broadband Alliance for 2017 through payment of a membership fee in the amount of $1,500. This is the same amount that City Council approved for payment in September 2016 covering 2016 dues. The City did not consider payment of the 2016 fee until late in the year due to the transition from City Management to Arvig which started in July. Once it was determined that the FiberNet would be operated under a management contract, it became evident that a significant portion of the operational support provided by the MN Public Broadband Alliance would no longer be needed. In light of the added management support coming from Arvig, the MN Public Broadband Alliance reduced the Monticello's fee from $5,000 to $1,500. In a related action, the Alliance developed a tiered system which aligned dues based on jurisdiction population. In 2016, Council also asked that the City of Monticello no longer provide services as fiscal agent to the group. Since this date, fiscal agent responsibilities have been taken over by Scott County. Highlighted in green are some of the benefits associated with being a member of the organization. • Supports exchange of information between a network of Cities and Counties that provide telecommunication resources to its business and residential citizens. • Centralization research and application of emerging technologies • Provides information and technical assistance to public agencies that wish to improve access to broadband for constituents. • Establishes a centralized voice in the debate over issues affecting deployment of broadband services in Minnesota. • Speeds the identification and deployment of telecommunication services and applications to its members. • Provides technical information and support to the State Legislature pertaining to legislation that local units of government that own and operate public broadband resources. As noted above, the Public Broadband Alliance has now established a tiered fee system that assigns dues amounts based on jurisdiction population. o Cities or entity representing cities with a population under 5,000 = $500 o Cities or entity representing cities with population of 5,000 — 50,000 = $1,500 o Cities/Counties or entity representing cities/counties with population of 50,000 — 125,000 = $5,000 City Council Agenda: 06/12/17 o Cities/Counties or entity representing cities/counties with population over 125,000 = $7,500 Al. Budget Impact: Funds derived from the general fund and not an Arvig related expenditure.. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Meetings are once per month and attended by the City Administrator. The Mayor, members of the City Council are welcome to attend. Meetings are most frequently attended via conference call. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve membership in the MN Public Broadband Alliance through the end of 2017 with the dues amount at $1,500. 2. Motion to deny funding supporting continued paid membership in the MN Public Broadband Alliance. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The City Administrator recommends alternative 1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Invoice B. CC Minutes 09-26-2016 2 a)'Scott INVOICE Bill To: MONTICELLO, CITY OF ATTN CITY ADMINSTRATOR 505 WALNUT STREET MONTICELLO MN 55362 Page 1 of 1 Invoice Number: IN20109 Due Date: 06/12/2017 Invoice Date: 05/16/2017 Customer Number: 5059 AMOUNT ENCLOSED $ MAIL PAYMENT TO: Scott County Treasurer Attn: AR Accounting 200 Fourth Avenue West Shakopee MN 55379 United States of America PLEASE DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION WITH REMITTANCE Line Item Description Quantity Unit Price 1 2017 MINNESOTA PUBLIC BROADBAND 1.00 EA 1,500.00 EA ALLIANCE MEMBERSHIP DUES IF ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT DEB @ (952) 496-8601. MAIL PAYMENT TO: Scott County Treasurer Attn: AR Accounting 200 Fourth Avenue West Shakopee MN 55379 United States of America Customer PO: VAT Nbr: Credit Net Amount 0.00 1,500.00 TERMS: Net 30 Days Tax Amount: $0.00 Down Payment: $0.00 Gross Amount: $1,500.00 Invoice Credit: $0.00 Net Amount: $1,500.00 Invoice Number: IN20109 Invoice Date: 05/16/2017 Payment Due Date: 06/12/2017 Net Amount Due: $1,500.00 Angela Schumann gave a brief presentation of the pedestrian connection to the Rolling Woods Park from the Carlisle Village neighborhood. Based on a recent petition received from residents of Carlisle Village, staff requested authorization to pursue preparation of a design cost estimate based on a route aligmnent as selected by the City Council. Ms. Schumann reviewed various options for considerations and it was mentioned that an existing pathway escrow of $11,400 is being held for the construction of the sidewalk. There was some discussion on the Engineering analysis costs and whether or not this service is need. Brian Stumpf and Glen Posusta expressed their concern about paying the $3,000 for Engineering analysis. Lloyd Hilgart questioned whether the sidewalk is needed. Charlotte Gabler moved approval of authorizing preparation of cost estimates for the design and construction of a direct sidewalk connection on the south side of Bakken Street to Rolling Woods Park, including crosswalks and pedestrian ramps at Garvey Court, Troy Marquette and Deer Street as described. Lloyd Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried 4-1; Glen Posusta voted against because in his opinion the Public Works Department can complete the project. C. Consideration of renewing membership in the MN Public Broadband Alliance for 2016 Jeff O'Neill provided an update and noted that the revised MN Public Broadband fee is $1,500 for 2016. The Alliance reduced the dues in recognition of the change in management. Mr. O'Neill noted that, in his opinion, the City still receives a benefit from remaining a member. Some of the benefits included: sharing and distributing information; lobbying; and best practices. Mr. O'Neill mentioned that the Finance Director believes that the benefits are marginal and difficult to quantify, therefore, he does not support the $1,500 dues payment. There was discussion among the City Council in regard to the City operating as the fiscal agent for the group. Brian Stumpf commented that he is not in favor of this. Glen Posusta does not agree with membership. Glen Posusta moved to deny funding supporting continues paid membership in the MN Public Broadband Alliance. The motion died for lack of a second. Charlotte Gabler moved approval of membership in the MN Public Broadband Alliance through the end of 2016 with the dues amount of $1,500 and moved that the City will no longer act as fiscal agent of the organization. Lloyd Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried 4-1; Glen Posusta voted against. D. Consideration of authorizinu staff to obtain proposals from real estate brokers interested in marketing commercial parcels at and in the vicinity of Jefferson Commons. City Council Minutes — September 26, 2016 page 8 19 City Council Agenda: 06/12/17 o Cities/Counties or entity representing cities/counties with population over 125,000 = $7,500 Al. Budget Impact: Funds derived from the general fund and not an Arvig related expenditure.. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Meetings are once per month and attended by the City Administrator. The Mayor, members of the City Council are welcome to attend. Meetings are most frequently attended via conference call. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve membership in the MN Public Broadband Alliance through the end of 2017 with the dues amount at $1,500. 2. Motion to deny funding supporting continued paid membership in the MN Public Broadband Alliance. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The City Administrator recommends alternative 1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Invoice B. CC Minutes 09-26-2016 2 a)'Scott INVOICE Bill To: MONTICELLO, CITY OF ATTN CITY ADMINSTRATOR 505 WALNUT STREET MONTICELLO MN 55362 Page 1 of 1 Invoice Number: IN20109 Due Date: 06/12/2017 Invoice Date: 05/16/2017 Customer Number: 5059 AMOUNT ENCLOSED $ MAIL PAYMENT TO: Scott County Treasurer Attn: AR Accounting 200 Fourth Avenue West Shakopee MN 55379 United States of America PLEASE DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION WITH REMITTANCE Line Item Description Quantity Unit Price 1 2017 MINNESOTA PUBLIC BROADBAND 1.00 EA 1,500.00 EA ALLIANCE MEMBERSHIP DUES IF ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT DEB @ (952) 496-8601. MAIL PAYMENT TO: Scott County Treasurer Attn: AR Accounting 200 Fourth Avenue West Shakopee MN 55379 United States of America Customer PO: VAT Nbr: Credit Net Amount 0.00 1,500.00 TERMS: Net 30 Days Tax Amount: $0.00 Down Payment: $0.00 Gross Amount: $1,500.00 Invoice Credit: $0.00 Net Amount: $1,500.00 Invoice Number: IN20109 Invoice Date: 05/16/2017 Payment Due Date: 06/12/2017 Net Amount Due: $1,500.00 Angela Schumann gave a brief presentation of the pedestrian connection to the Rolling Woods Park from the Carlisle Village neighborhood. Based on a recent petition received from residents of Carlisle Village, staff requested authorization to pursue preparation of a design cost estimate based on a route aligmnent as selected by the City Council. Ms. Schumann reviewed various options for considerations and it was mentioned that an existing pathway escrow of $11,400 is being held for the construction of the sidewalk. There was some discussion on the Engineering analysis costs and whether or not this service is need. Brian Stumpf and Glen Posusta expressed their concern about paying the $3,000 for Engineering analysis. Lloyd Hilgart questioned whether the sidewalk is needed. Charlotte Gabler moved approval of authorizing preparation of cost estimates for the design and construction of a direct sidewalk connection on the south side of Bakken Street to Rolling Woods Park, including crosswalks and pedestrian ramps at Garvey Court, Troy Marquette and Deer Street as described. Lloyd Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried 4-1; Glen Posusta voted against because in his opinion the Public Works Department can complete the project. C. Consideration of renewing membership in the MN Public Broadband Alliance for 2016 Jeff O'Neill provided an update and noted that the revised MN Public Broadband fee is $1,500 for 2016. The Alliance reduced the dues in recognition of the change in management. Mr. O'Neill noted that, in his opinion, the City still receives a benefit from remaining a member. Some of the benefits included: sharing and distributing information; lobbying; and best practices. Mr. O'Neill mentioned that the Finance Director believes that the benefits are marginal and difficult to quantify, therefore, he does not support the $1,500 dues payment. There was discussion among the City Council in regard to the City operating as the fiscal agent for the group. Brian Stumpf commented that he is not in favor of this. Glen Posusta does not agree with membership. Glen Posusta moved to deny funding supporting continues paid membership in the MN Public Broadband Alliance. The motion died for lack of a second. Charlotte Gabler moved approval of membership in the MN Public Broadband Alliance through the end of 2016 with the dues amount of $1,500 and moved that the City will no longer act as fiscal agent of the organization. Lloyd Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried 4-1; Glen Posusta voted against. D. Consideration of authorizinu staff to obtain proposals from real estate brokers interested in marketing commercial parcels at and in the vicinity of Jefferson Commons. City Council Minutes — September 26, 2016 page 8 19 City Council Agenda: 06/12/17 2K. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-24 approving a Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT (SB) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: MnDOT is requesting the City renew their 5 -year Master Partnership Contract with the City effective June 30, 2017 to June 30, 2022. This contract is pursuant to Minnesota Statue Sections 471.59, 174.02 and 161.20 allowing MnDOT to enter into agreements with local governments for shared routine services. The contract also allows for Cities and MnDOT to initiate Work Order Contracts where the scope and costs are defined. Per an email from MnDOT, "Master Contracts are umbrella contracts which allow local agencies and MnDOT to exchange goods and services. The Master itself allows MnDOT, upon request of the local agency, to deliver small, routine services to local agencies. These services are listed in Exhibit A of the Contract. Any other type of service needs a stand-alone work order written agreeing to costs and terms of service. The local agency is always in control of requesting work. MnDOT will not perform services without a written request from the local agency." Under this resolution, the City Administrator is authorized to enter into work order contracts on behalf of the City within the confines of the City of Monticello Purchasing Policy. The City uses this contract primarily to allow MnDOT to complete lab testing for materials, such as concrete and bituminous testing on State or Municipal State Aid roadway projects. There are no changes to this contract from the previous 5 -year contract that was approved by Council on December 12, 2016. At that time, it was identified that a new contract would be forthcoming. A.1 Budget Impact: Anticipated to be minimal or status quo. A.2 Staff Impact: Minimal staff time or status quo. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2017-24 approving a Master Partnership Contract with MnDOT. 2. Motion to deny adoption of City Resolution 2017-24. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: City Council Agenda: 06/12/17 A. Resolution 2017-24 B. MnDOT Cover Letter C. Master Partnership Contract D. Exhibit A RESOLUTION 2017-24 RESOLUTION APPROVING A MASTER PARTNERSHIP CONTRACT WITH THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WHEREAS, The Minnesota Department of Transportation wishes to cooperate closely with local units of government to coordinate the delivery of transportation services and maximize the efficient delivery of such services at all levels of government; and WHEREAS, MnDOT and local governments are authorized by Minnesota Statutes sections 471.59, 174.02, and 161.20, to undertake collaborative efforts for the design, construction, maintenance and operation of state and local roads; and WHEREAS, the parties wish to able to respond quickly and efficiently to such opportunities for collaboration, and have determined that having the ability to write "work orders" against a master contract would provide the greatest speed and flexibility in responding to identified needs. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Monticello as follows: 1. That the City of Monticello enter into a Master Partnership Contract with the Minnesota Department of Transportation, a copy of which was before the Council. 2. That the proper City officers are authorized to execute such contract, and any amendments thereto. 3. That the Monticello City Administrator is authorized to negotiate work order contracts pursuant to the Master Contract, which work order contracts may provide for payment to or from MnDOT, and that the City Engineer may execute such work order contracts on behalf of the City of Monticello without further approval by this Council. Adopted by the City Council of Monticello this 12th day of June, 2017. Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk Date: June 6, 2017 To: Shibani Bisson Monticello City Engineer 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 State Aid for Local Transportation 395 John Ireland Blvd., MS 500 St. Paul, MN 55155 RE: Proposed Master Partnership Contract Attached is a copy of a proposed master partnership contract between the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) and Monticello City. The Master Partnership Contract provides a framework for MnDOT and Local Agencies to provide services and payment to each other. A few MnDOT provided routine services are included in the contract—see Exhibit A-- but all other services require work orders describing costs and scope. Kindly review the enclosed document and if acceptable, arrange to have it presented to your Council for their approval and execution. Please provide signatures only under the Citv of Monticello heading. Also required is a new resolution passed by the Council authorizing its officials to sign and execute the agreement on its behalf. (Only the named officials may sign the agreement: if anyone else signs in the named official's place, the agreement will not be executed.) Please return to me at the address listed above or as a pdf to olga.kruglova@state.mn.us. Please note that no work shall be performed by MnDOT personnel until the full execution of the agreement. After execution by MnDOT and other State officials, a copy of the agreement will be returned to you. If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me at 651-366- 3806. If your local agency will not be executing this contract, please send me an email informing me of this so I can remove you from our list. Thankyou Olga Kruglova Transportation Program Specialist MnDOT State Aid Office olga.kruglova@state.mn.us CC: Kelvin Howieson MnDOT Contract Number: 1028389 STATE OF MINNESOTA AND Cy 161911 Sur [1]QY Y [y 011111C MASTER PARTNERSHIP CONTRACT This master contract is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of Transportation in this contract referred to as the "State" and the City of MONTICELLO, acting through its City Council, in this contract referred to as the "Local Government." Recitals 1. The parties are authorized to enter into this contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, §§ 15.061, 471.59 and 174.02. 2. Minn. Stat. § 161.20, subd. 2, authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to make arrangements with and cooperate with any governmental authority for the purposes of constructing, maintaining and improving the trunk highway system. 3. Each party to this contract is a "road authority" as defined by Minn. Stat. § 160.02, subd. 25. 4. Minn. Stat. § 161.39, subd. 1, authorizes a road authority to perform work for another road authority. Such work may include providing technical and engineering advice, assistance and supervision, surveying, preparing plans for the construction or reconstruction of roadways, and performing roadway maintenance. 5. Minn. Stat. § 174.02, subd. 6, authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to enter into contracts with other governmental entities for research and experimentation; for sharing facilities, equipment, staff, data, or other means of providing transportation -related services; or for other cooperative programs that promote efficiencies in providing governmental services, or that further development of innovation in transportation for the benefit of the citizens of Minnesota. 6. Each party wishes to occasionally purchase services from the other party, which the parties agree will enhance the efficiency of delivering governmental services at all levels. This Master Partnership Contract (MPC) provides a framework for the efficient handling of such requests. This MPC contains terms generally governing the relationship between the parties. When specific services are requested, the parties will (unless otherwise specified) enter into a "Work Order" contracts. 7. After the execution of this MPC, the parties may (but are not required to) enter into "Work Order" contracts. These Work Orders will specify the work to be done, timelines for completion, and compensation to be paid for the specific work. 8. The parties are entering into this MPC to establish terms that will govern all of the Work Orders subsequently issued under the authority of this Contract. Master Partnership Contract 1. Term of Master Partnership Contract; Use of Work Order Contracts; Survival of Terms 1.1. Effective Date: This contract will be effective on the date last signed by the Local Government, and all State officials as required under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subd. 2. 1.2. A party must not accept work under this Contract until it is fully executed. 1.3. Expiration Date. This Contract will expire on June 30, 2022. Page 1 of 13 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 04/10/2017) MnDOT Contract Number: 1028389 1.4. Work Order Contracts. A work order contract must be negotiated and executed (by both the State and the Local Government) for each particular engagement, except for Technical Services provided by the State to the Local Government as specified in Article 2. The work order contract must specify the detailed scope of work and deliverables for that project. A party must not begin work under a work order until the work order is fully executed. The terms of this MPC will apply to all work orders contracts issued, unless specifically varied in the work order. The Local Government understands that this MPC is not a guarantee of any payments or work order assignments, and that payments will only be issued for work actually performed under fully -executed work orders. 1.5. Survival of Terms. The following clauses survive the expiration or cancellation of this master contract and all work order contracts: 12. Liability; 13. State Audits; 14. Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property; 17. Publicity; 18. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue; and 22. Data Disclosure. All terms of this MPC will survive with respect to any work order contract issued prior to the expiration date of the MPC. 1.6. Sample Work Order. A sample work order contract is available upon request from the State. 1.7. Definition of "Providing Party" and "Requesting Party". For the purpose of assigning certain duties and obligations in the MPC to work order contracts, the following definitions will apply throughout the MPC. "Requesting Party" is defined as the party requesting the other party to perform work under a work order contract. "Providing Party" is defined as the party performing the scope of work under a work order contract. 2. Technical Services 2.1. Technical Services include repetitive low-cost services routinely performed by the State for the Local Government. These services may be performed by the State for the Local Government without the execution of a work order, as these services are provided in accordance with standardized practices and processes and do not require a detailed scope of work. Exhibit A — Table of Technical Services is attached. 2.1.1. Every other service not falling under the services listed in Exhibit A will require a work order contract. 2.2. The Local Government may request the State to perform Technical Services in an informal manner, such as by the use of email, a purchase order, or by delivering materials to a State lab and requesting testing. A request may be made via telephone, but will not be considered accepted unless acknowledged in writing by the State. 2.3. The State will promptly inform the Local Government if the State will be unable to perform the requested Technical Services. Otherwise, the State will perform the Technical Services in accordance with the State's normal processes and practices, including scheduling practices taking into account the availability of State staff and equipment. 2.4. Payment Basis. Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties prior to performance of the services, the State will charge the Local Government the State's then -current rate for performing the Technical Services. The then -current rate may include the State's normal and customary additives. The State will invoice the Local Government upon completion of the services, or at regular intervals not more than once monthly as agreed upon by the parties. The invoice will provide a summary of the Technical Services provided by the State during the invoice period. 3. Services Requiring A Work Order Contract 3.1. Work Order Contracts: A party may request the other party to perform any of the following services under individual work order contracts. Page 2 of 13 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 04/10/2017) MnDOT Contract Number: 1028389 3.2. Professional and Technical Services. A party may provide professional and technical services upon the request of the other party. As defined by Minn. Stat. § 16C.08, subd. 1, professional/technical services "means services that are intellectual in character, including consultation, analysis, evaluation, prediction, planning, programming, or recommendation; and result in the production of a report or completion of a task." Professional and technical services do not include providing supplies or materials except as incidental to performing such services. Professional and technical services include (by way of example and without limitation) engineering services, surveying, foundation recommendations and reports, environmental documentation, right-of-way assistance (such as performing appraisals or providing relocation assistance, but excluding the exercise of the power of eminent domain), geometric layouts, final construction plans, graphic presentations, public relations, and facilitating open houses. A party will normally provide such services with its own personnel; however, a party's professional/technical services may also include hiring and managing outside consultants to perform work provided that a party itself provides active project management for the use of such outside consultants. 3.3. Roadway Maintenance. A party may provide roadway maintenance upon the request of the other party. Roadway maintenance does not include roadway reconstruction. This work may include but is not limited to snow removal, ditch spraying, roadside mowing, bituminous mill and overlay (only small projects), seal coat, bridge hits, major retaining wall failures, major drainage failures, and message painting. All services must be performed by an employee with sufficient skills, training, expertise or certification to perform such work, and work must be supervised by a qualified employee of the party performing the work. 3.4. Construction Administration. A party may administer roadway construction projects upon the request of the other party. Roadway construction includes (by way of example and without limitation) the construction, reconstruction, or rehabilitation of mainline, shoulder, median, pedestrian or bicycle pathway, lighting and signal systems, pavement mill and overlays, seal coating, guardrail installation, and channelization. These services may be performed by the Providing Party's own forces, or the Providing Party may administer outside contracts for such work. Construction administration may include letting and awarding construction contracts for such work (including state projects to be completed in conjunction with local projects). All contract administration services must be performed by an employee with sufficient skills, training, expertise or certification to perform such work. 3.5. Emergency Services. A party may provide aid upon request of the other party in the event of a man-made disaster, natural disaster or other act of God. Emergency services includes all those services as the parties mutually agree are necessary to plan for, prepare for, deal with, and recover from emergency situations. These services include, without limitation, planning, engineering, construction, maintenance, and removal and disposal services related to things such as road closures, traffic control, debris removal, flood protection and mitigation, sign repair, sandbag activities and general cleanup. Work will be performed by an employee with sufficient skills, training, expertise or certification to perform such work, and work must be supervised by a qualified employee of the party performing the work. If it is not feasible to have an executed work order prior to performance of the work, the parties will promptly confer to determine whether work may be commenced without a fully -executed work order in place. If work commences without a fully -executed work order, the parties will follow up with execution of a work order as soon as feasible. 3.6. When a need is identified, the State and the Local Government will discuss the proposed work and the resources needed to perform the work. If a party desires to perform such work, the parties will negotiate the specific and detailed work tasks and cost. The State will then prepare a work order contract. Generally, a work order contract will be limited to one specific project/engagement, although "on call" work orders may be prepared for certain types of services, especially for "Technical Services" items as identified section 2. L. The work order will also identify specific deliverables required, and timeframes for completing work. A work order must be fully executed by the parties prior to work being commenced. Page 3 of 13 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 04/10/2017) MnDOT Contract Number: 1028389 The Local Government will not be paid for work performed prior to execution of a work order contract and authorization by the State. 4. Responsibilities of the Providing Party 4.1. Terms Applicable to ALL Work Order Contracts. The terms in this section 4.1 will apply to ALL work order contracts. 4.1.1. Each work order will identify an Authorized Representative for each party. Each party's authorized representative is responsible for administering the work order, and has the authority to make any decisions regarding the work, and to give and receive any notices required or permitted under this MPC or the work order. 4.1.2. The Providing Party will furnish and assign a publicly employed licensed engineer (Project Engineer), to be in responsible charge of the project(s) and to supervise and direct the work to be performed under each work order contract. For services not requiring an engineer, the Providing Party will furnish and assign another responsible employee to be in charge of the project. The services of the Providing Party under a work order contract may not be otherwise assigned, sublet, or transferred unless approved in writing by the Requesting Party's authorized representative. This written consent will in no way relieve the Providing Party from its primary responsibility for the work. 4.1.3. If the Local Government is the Providing Party, the Project Engineer may request in writing specific engineering and/or technical services from the State, pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 161.39. The work order Contract will require the Local Government to deposit payment in advance. The costs and expenses will include the current State additives and overhead rates, subject to adjustment based on actual direct costs that have been verified by audit. 4.1.4. Only the receipt of a fully executed work order contract authorizes the Providing Party to begin work on a project. Any and all effort, expenses, or actions taken by the Providing Party before the work order contract is fully executed are considered unauthorized and undertaken at the risk of non-payment. 4.1.5. In connection with the performance of this contract and any work orders issued, the Providing Agency will comply with all applicable Federal and State laws and regulations. When the Providing Party is authorized or permitted to award contracts in connection with any work order, the Providing Party will require and cause its contractors and subcontractors to comply with all Federal and State laws and regulations. 4.2. Additional Terms for Roadway Maintenance. The terms of section 4.1 and this section 4.2 will apply to all work orders for Roadway Maintenance. 4.2.1. Unless otherwise provided for by contract or work order, the Providing Party must obtain all permits and sanctions that may be required for the proper and lawful performance of the work. 4.2.2. The Providing Party must perform maintenance in accordance with MnDOT maintenance manuals, policies and operations. 4.2.3. The Providing Party must use State -approved materials, including (by way of example and without limitation), sign posts, sign sheeting, and de-icing and anti -icing chemicals. 4.3. Additional Terms for Construction Administration. The terms of section 4.1 and this section 4.3 will apply to all work order contracts for construction administration. 4.3.1. Contract(s) must be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder or best value proposer in accordance with state law. Page 4 of 13 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 04/10/2017) MnDOT Contract Number: 1028389 4.3.2. Contractor(s) must be required to post payment and performance bonds in an amount equal to the contract amount. The Providing Parry will take all necessary action to make claims against such bonds in the event of any default by the contractor. 4.3.3. Contractor(s) must be required to perform work in accordance with the latest edition of the Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Construction. 4.3.4. For work performed on State right-of-way, contractor(s) must be required to indemnify and hold the State harmless against any loss incurred with respect to the performance of the contracted work, and must be required to provide evidence of insurance coverage commensurate with project risk. 4.3.5. Contractor(s) must pay prevailing wages pursuant to applicable state and federal law. 4.3.6. Contractor(s) must comply with all applicable Federal, and State laws, ordinances and regulations, including but not limited to applicable human rights/anti-discrimination laws and laws concerning the participation of Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in federally -assisted contracts. 4.3.7. Unless otherwise agreed in a work order contract, each party will be responsible for providing rights of way, easement, and construction permits for its portion of the improvements. Each party will, upon the other's request, furnish copies of right of way certificates, easements, and construction permits. 4.3.8. The Providing Party may approve minor changes to the Requesting Party's portion of the project work if such changes do not increase the Requesting Party's cost obligation under the applicable work order contract. 4.3.9. The Providing Party will not approve any contractor claims for additional compensation without the Requesting Party's written approval, and the execution of a proper amendment to the applicable work order contract when necessary. The Local Government will tender the processing and defense of any such claims to the State upon the State's request. 4.3.10. The Local Government must coordinate all trunk highway work affecting any utilities with the State's Utilities Office. 4.3.11. The Providing Party must coordinate all necessary detours with the Requesting Party. 4.3.12. If the Local Government is the Providing Party, and there is work performed on the trunk highway right-of-way, the following will apply: 4.3.12.1 The Local Government will have a permit to perform the work on the trunk highway. The State may revoke this permit if the work is not being performed in a safe, proper and skillful manner, or if the contractor is violating the terms of any law, regulation, or permit applicable to the work. The State will have no liability to the Local Government, or its contractor, if work is suspended or stopped due to any such condition or concern. 4.3.12.2 The Local Government will require its contractor to conduct all traffic control in accordance with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 4.3.12.3 The Local Government will require its contractor to comply with the terms of all permits issued for the project including, but not limited to, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and other environmental permits. 4.3.12.4 All improvements constructed on the State's right-of-way will become the property of the State. 5. Responsibilities of the Requesting Party Page 5 of 13 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 04/10/2017) MnDOT Contract Number: 1028389 5.1. After authorizing the Providing Party to begin work, the Requesting Party will furnish any data or material in its possession relating to the project that may be of use to the Providing Party in performing the work. 5.2. All such data furnished to the Providing Party will remain the property of the Requesting Party and will be promptly returned upon the Requesting Party's request or upon the expiration or termination of this contract (subject to data retention requirements of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and other applicable law). 5.3. The Providing Party will analyze all such data furnished by the Requesting Party. If the Providing Party finds any such data to be incorrect or incomplete, the Providing Party will bring the facts to the attention of the Requesting Party before proceeding with the part of the project affected. The Providing Party will investigate the matter, and if it finds that such data is incorrect or incomplete, it will promptly determine a method for furnishing corrected data. Delay in furnishing data will not be considered justification for an adjustment in compensation. 5.4. The State will provide to the Local Government copies of any Trunk Highway fund clauses to be included in the bid solicitation and will provide any required Trunk Highway fund provisions to be included in the Proposal for Highway Construction, that are different from those required for State Aid construction. 5.5. The Requesting Party will perform final reviews and inspections of its portion of the project work. If the work is found to have been completed in accordance with the work order contract, the Requesting Party will promptly release any remaining funds due the Providing Party for the Project(s). 5.6. The work order contracts may include additional responsibilities to be completed by the Requesting Party. 6. Time In the performance of project work under a work order contract, time is of the essence. 7. Consideration and Payment 7.1. Consideration. The Requesting Party will pay the Providing Party as specified in the work order. The State's normal and customary additives will apply to work performed by the State, unless otherwise specified in the work order. The State's normal and customary additives will not apply if the parties agree to a "lump sum" or "unit rate" payment. 7.2. State's Maximum Obligation. The total compensation to be paid by the State to the Local Government under all work order contracts issued pursuant to this MPC will not exceed $100,000.00. 7.3. Travel Expenses. It is anticipated that all travel expenses will be included in the base cost of the Providing Party's services, and unless otherwise specifically set forth in an applicable work order contract, the Providing Parry will not be separately reimbursed for travel and subsistence expenses incurred by the Providing Party in performing any work order contract. In those cases where the State agrees to reimburse travel expenses, such expenses will be reimbursed in the same manner and in no greater amount than provided in the current "MnDOT Travel Regulations" a copy of which is on file with and available from the MnDOT District Office. The Local Government will not be reimbursed for travel and subsistence expenses incurred outside of Minnesota unless it has received the State's prior written approval for such travel. 7.4. Payment. 7.4.1. Generally. The Requesting Party will pay the Providing Party as specified in the applicable work order, and will make prompt payment in accordance with Minnesota law. 7.4.2. Payment by the Local Government. Page 6 of 13 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 04/10/2017) MnDOT Contract Number: 1028389 7.4.2.1. The Local Government will make payment to the order of the Commissioner of Transportation. 7.4.2.2. IMPORTANT NOTE: PAYMENT MUST REFERENCE THE "MNDOT CONTRACT NUMBER" SHOWN ON THE FACE PAGE OF THIS CONTRACT AND THE "INVOICE NUMBER" ON THE INVOICE RECEIVED FROM Dice" 7.4.2.3. Remit payment to the address below: MnDOT Attn: Cash Accounting RE: MnDOT Contract Number 1028389. Mail Stop 215 395 John Ireland Blvd St. Paul, MN 55155 7.4.3. Payment by the State. 7.4.3.1. Generally. The State will promptly pay the Local Government after the Local Government presents an itemized invoice for the services actually performed and the State's Authorized Representative accepts the invoiced services. Invoices must be submitted as specified in the applicable work order, but no more frequently than monthly. 7.4.3.2. Retainage for Professional and Technical Services. For work orders for professional and technical services, as required by Minn. Stat. § 16C.08, subd. 2(10), no more than 90 percent of the amount due under any work order contract may be paid until the final product of the work order contract has been reviewed by the State's authorized representative. The balance due will be paid when the State's authorized representative determines that the Local Government has satisfactorily fulfilled all the terms of the work order contract. 8. Conditions of Payment All work performed by the Providing Party under a work order contract must be performed to the Requesting Party's satisfaction, as determined at the sole and reasonable discretion of the Requesting Party's Authorized Representative and in accordance with all applicable federal and state laws, rules, and regulations. The Providing Party will not receive payment for work found by the State to be unsatisfactory or performed in violation of federal or state law. 9. Local Government's Authorized Representative and Project Manager; Authority to Execute Work Order Contracts 9.1. The Local Government's Authorized Representative for administering this master contract is the Local Government's City Administrator, and the City Administrator has the responsibility to monitor the Local Government's performance. The Local Government's Authorized Representative is also authorized to execute work order contracts on behalf of the Local Government without approval of each proposed work order contract by its governing body. 9.2. The Local Government's Project Manager will be identified in each work order contract. 10. State's Authorized Representative and Project Manager 10.1. The State's Authorized Representative for this master contract is the District State Aid Engineer, who has the responsibility to monitor the State's performance. 10.2. The State's Project Manager will be identified in each work order contract. Page 7 of 13 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 04/10/2017) MnDOT Contract Number: 1028389 11. Assignment, Amendments, Waiver, and Contract Complete 11.1. Assignment. Neither party may assign or transfer any rights or obligations under this MPC or any work order contract without the prior consent of the other and a fully executed Assignment Contract, executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved this MPC, or their successors in office. 11.2. Amendments. Any amendment to this master contract or any work order contract must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original contract, or their successors in office. 11.3. Waiver. If a party fails to enforce any provision of this master contract or any work order contract, that failure does not waive the provision or the party's right to subsequently enforce it. 11.4. Contract Complete. This master contract and any work order contract contain all negotiations and contracts between the State and the Local Government. No other understanding regarding this master contract or any work order contract issued hereunder, whether written or oral may be used to bind either party. 12. Liability. Each party will be responsible for its own acts and omissions to the extent provided by law. The Local Government's liability is governed by Minn. Stat. chapter 466 and other applicable law. The State's liability is governed by Minn. Stat. section 3.736 and other applicable law. This clause will not be construed to bar any legal remedies a party may have for the other party's failure to fulfill its obligations under this master contract or any work order contract. Neither party agrees to assume any environmental liability on behalf of the other party. A Providing Party under any work order is acting only as a "Contractor" to the Requesting Party, as the term "Contractor" is defined in Minn. Stat. § 115B.03 (subd. 10), and is entitled to the protections afforded to a "Contractor" by the Minnesota Environmental Response and Liability Act. The parties specifically intend that Minn. Stat. §471.59 subd. 1 a will apply to any work undertaken under this MPC and any work order issued hereunder. 13. State Audits Under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subd. 5, the parry's books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices relevant to any work order contract are subject to examination by the parties and by the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the end of this MPC. 14. Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property 14.1. Government Data Practices. The Local Government and State must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, as it applies to all data provided by the State under this MPC and any work order contract, and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Local Government under this MPC and any work order contract. The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. § 13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by either the Local Government or the State. 14.2. Intellectual Property Rights 14.2.1. Intellectual Property Rights. The Requesting Party will own all rights, title, and interest in all of the intellectual property rights, including copyrights, patents, trade secrets, trademarks, and service marks in the Works and Documents created and paid for under work order contracts. Works means all inventions, improvements, discoveries (whether or not patentable), databases, computer programs, reports, notes, studies, photographs, negatives, designs, drawings, specifications, materials, tapes, and disks conceived, reduced to practice, created or originated by the Providing Party, its employees, agents, and subcontractors, either individually or jointly with others in the performance of this master contract or any work order contract. Works includes "Documents." Documents are the originals of any databases, computer programs, reports, notes, Page 8 of 13 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 04/10/2017) MnDOT Contract Number: 1028389 studies, photographs, negatives, designs, drawings, specifications, materials, tapes, disks, or other materials, whether in tangible or electronic forms, prepared by the Providing Party, its employees, agents, or contractors, in the performance of a work order contract. The Documents will be the exclusive property of the Requesting Party and all such Documents must be immediately returned to the Requesting Party by the Providing Party upon completion or cancellation of the work order contract. To the extent possible, those Works eligible for copyright protection under the United States Copyright Act will be deemed to be "works made for hire." The Providing Party Government assigns all right, title, and interest it may have in the Works and the Documents to the Requesting Party. The Providing Party must, at the request of the Requesting Party, execute all papers and perform all other acts necessary to transfer or record the Requesting Party's ownership interest in the Works and Documents. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Requesting Party grants the Providing Party an irrevocable and royalty -free license to use such intellectual property for its own non-commercial purposes, including dissemination to political subdivisions of the state of Minnesota and to transportation -related agencies such as the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 14.2.2. Obligations with Respect to Intellectual Property. 14.2.2.1. Notification. Whenever any invention, improvement, or discovery (whether or not patentable) is made or conceived for the first time or actually or constructively reduced to practice by the Providing Party, including its employees and subcontractors, in the performance of the work order contract, the Providing Party will immediately give the Requesting Party's Authorized Representative written notice thereof, and must promptly furnish the Authorized Representative with complete information and/or disclosure thereon. 14.2.2.2. Representation. The Providing Party must perform all acts, and take all steps necessary to ensure that all intellectual property rights in the Works and Documents are the sole property of the Requesting Party, and that neither Providing Party nor its employees, agents or contractors retain any interest in and to the Works and Documents. 15. Affirmative Action The State intends to carry out its responsibility for requiring affirmative action by its Contractors, pursuant to Minn. Stat. §363A.36. Pursuant to that Statute, the Local Government is encouraged to prepare and implement an affirmative action plan for the employment of minority persons, women, and the qualified disabled, and submit such plan to the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights. In addition, when the Local Government lets a contract for the performance of work under a work order issued pursuant to this MPC, it must include the following in the bid or proposal solicitation and any contracts awarded as a result thereof: 15.1. Covered Contracts and Contractors. If the Contract exceeds $100,000 and the Contractor employed more than 40 full-time employees on a single working day during the previous 12 months in Minnesota or in the state where it has its principle place of business, then the Contractor must comply with the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 363A.36 and Minn. R. Parts 5000.3400-5000.3600. A Contractor covered by Minn. Stat. § 363A.36 because it employed more than 40 full-time employees in another state and does not have a certificate of compliance, must certify that it is in compliance with federal affirmative action requirements. 15.2. Minn. Stat. § 363A.36. Minn. Stat. § 363A.36 requires the Contractor to have an affirmative action plan for the employment of minority persons, women, and qualified disabled individuals approved by the Minnesota Commissioner of Human Rights ("Commissioner") as indicated by a certificate of compliance. The law addresses suspension or revocation of a certificate of compliance and contract consequences in that event. A contract awarded without a certificate of compliance may be voided. 15.3. Minn. R. Parts 5000.3400-5000.3600. Page 9 of 13 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 04/10/2017) MnDOT Contract Number: 1028389 15.3.1. General. Minn. R. Parts 5000.3400-5000.3600 implement Minn. Stat. § 363A.36. These rules include, but are not limited to, criteria for contents, approval, and implementation of affirmative action plans; procedures for issuing certificates of compliance and criteria for determining a contractor's compliance status; procedures for addressing deficiencies, sanctions, and notice and hearing; annual compliance reports; procedures for compliance review; and contract consequences for non-compliance. The specific criteria for approval or rejection of an affirmative action plan are contained in various provisions of Minn. R. Parts 5000.3400-5000.3600 including, but not limited to, parts 5000.3420-5000.3500 and 5000.3552-5000.3559. 15.3.2. Disabled Workers. The Contractor must comply with the following affirmative action requirements for disabled workers: 15.3.2.1. The Contractor must not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of physical or mental disability in regard to any position for which the employee or applicant for employment is qualified. The Contractor agrees to take affirmative action to employ, advance in employment, and otherwise treat qualified disabled persons without discrimination based upon their physical or mental disability in all employment practices such as the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment, advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship. 15.3.2.2. The Contractor agrees to comply with the rules and relevant orders of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights issued pursuant to the Minnesota Human Rights Act. 15.3.2.3. In the event of the Contractor's noncompliance with the requirements of this clause, actions for noncompliance may be taken in accordance with Minn. Stat. Section 363A.36, and the rules and relevant orders of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights issued pursuant to the Minnesota Human Rights Act. 15.3.2.4. The Contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices in a form to be prescribed by the commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights. Such notices must state the Contractor's obligation under the law to take affirmative action to employ and advance in employment qualified disabled employees and applicants for employment, and the rights of applicants and employees. 15.3.2.5. The Contractor must notify each labor union or representative of workers with which it has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract understanding, that the Contractor is bound by the terms of Minn. Stat. Section 363A.36, of the Minnesota Human Rights Act and is committed to take affirmative action to employ and advance in employment physically and mentally disabled persons. 15.3.3. Consequences. The consequences for the Contractor's failure to implement its affirmative action plan or make a good faith effort to do so include, but are not limited to, suspension or revocation of a certificate of compliance by the Commissioner, refusal by the Commissioner to approve subsequent plans, and termination of all or part of this contract by the Commissioner or the State. 15.3.4. Certification. The Contractor hereby certifies that it is in compliance with the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 363A.36 and Minn. R. Parts 5000.3400-5000.3600 and is aware of the consequences for noncompliance. 16. Workers' Compensation Each party will be responsible for its own employees for any workers compensation claims. This MPC, and any work order contracts issued hereunder, are not intended to constitute an interchange of government employees under Minn. Stat. § 15.53. To the extent that this MPC, or any work order issued hereunder, is determined to be Page 10 of 13 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 04/10/2017) MnDOT Contract Number: 1028389 subject to Minn. Stat. § 15.53, such statute will control to the extent of any conflict between the contract and the statute. 17. Publicity 17.1. Publicity. Any publicity regarding the subject matter of a work order contract where the State is the Requesting Party must identify the State as the sponsoring agency and must not be released without prior written approval from the State's Authorized Representative. For purposes of this provision, publicity includes notices, informational pamphlets, press releases, research, reports, signs, and similar public notices prepared by or for the Local Government individually or jointly with others, or any subcontractors, with respect to the program, publications, or services provided resulting from a work order contract. 17.2. Data Practices Act. Section 17.1 is not intended to override the Local Government's responsibilities under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. 18. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue Minnesota law, without regard to its choice -of -law provisions, governs this master contract and all work order contracts. Venue for all legal proceedings out of this master contract or any work order contracts, or the breach of any such contracts, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota. 19. Prompt Payment; Payment to Subcontractors The parties must make prompt payment of their obligations in accordance with applicable law. As required by Minn. Stat. § 16A.1245, when the Local Government lets a contract for work pursuant to any work order, the Local Government must require its contractor to pay all subcontractors, less any retainage, within 10 calendar days of the prime contractor's receipt of payment from the Local Government for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor(s) and must pay interest at the rate of one and one-half percent per month or any part of a month to the subcontractor(s) on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor(s). 20. Minn. Stat. § 181.59. The Local Government will comply with the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 181.59 which requires: Every contract for or on behalf of the state of Minnesota, or any county, city, town, township, school, school district, or any other district in the state, for materials, supplies, or construction shall contain provisions by which the Contractor agrees: (1) That, in the hiring of common or skilled labor for the performance of any work under any contract, or any subcontract, no contractor, material supplier, or vendor, shall, by reason of race, creed, or color, discriminate against the person or persons who are citizens of the United States or resident aliens who are qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates; (2) That no contractor, material supplier, or vendor, shall, in any manner, discriminate against, or intimidate, or prevent the employment of any person or persons identified in clause (1) of this section, or on being hired, prevent, or conspire to prevent, the person or persons from the performance of work under any contract on account of race, creed, or color; (3) That a violation of this section is a misdemeanor; and (4) That this contract may be canceled or terminated by the state, county, city, town, school board, or any other person authorized to grant the contracts for employment, and all money due, or to become due under the contract, may be forfeited for a second or any subsequent violation of the terms or conditions of this contract. 21. Termination; Suspension 21.1. Termination by the State for Convenience. The State or commissioner of Administration may cancel this MPC and any work order contracts at any time, with or without cause, upon 30 days written notice to the Local Government. Upon termination, the Local Government and the State will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed. 21.2. Termination by the Local Government for Convenience. The Local Government may cancel this MPC and any work order contracts at any time, with or without cause, upon 30 days written notice to the State. Page 11 of 13 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 04/10/2017) MnDOT Contract Number: 1028389 Upon termination, the Local Government and the State will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed. 21.3. Termination for Insufficient Funding. The State may immediately terminate or suspend this MPC and any work order contract if it does not obtain funding from the Minnesota legislature or other funding source; or if funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow for the payment of the services covered here. Termination or suspension must be by written or fax notice to the Local Government. The State is not obligated to pay for any services that are provided after notice and effective date of termination or suspension. However, the Local Government will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed to the extent that funds are available. The State will not be assessed any penalty if the master contract or work order is terminated because of the decision of the Minnesota legislature or other funding source, not to appropriate funds. The State must provide the Local Government notice of the lack of funding within a reasonable time of the State's receiving that notice. 22. Data Disclosure Under Minn. Stat. §270C.65, subd. 3, and other applicable law, the Local Government consents to disclosure of its federal employer tax identification number, and/or Minnesota tax identification number, already provided to the State, to federal and state tax agencies and state personnel involved in the payment of state obligations. These identification numbers may be used in the enforcement of federal and state tax laws which could result in action requiring the Local Government to file state tax returns and pay delinquent state tax liabilities, if any. 23. Defense of Claims and Lawsuits If any lawsuit or claim is filed by a third party (including but not limited to the Local Government's contractors and subcontractors), arising out of trunk highway work performed pursuant to a valid work order issued under this MPC, the Local Government will, at the discretion of and upon the request of the State, tender the defense of such claims to the State or allow the State to participate in the defense of such claims. The Local Government will, however, be solely responsible for defending any lawsuit or claim, or any portion thereof, when the claim or cause of action asserted is based on its own acts or omissions in performing or supervising the work. The Local Government will not purport to represent the State in any litigation, settlement, or alternative dispute resolution process. The State will not be responsible for any judgment entered against the Local Government, and will not be bound by the terms of any settlement entered into by the Local Government except with the written approval of the Attorney General and the Commissioner of Transportation and pursuant to applicable law. 24. Additional Provisions [The balance of this page has intentionally been left blank — signature page follows] Page 12 of 13 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 04/10/2017) LOCAL GOVERNMENT The Local Government certifies that the appropriate person(s) have executed the contract on behalf of the Local Government as required by applicable ordinance, resolution, or charter provision. ME MnDOT Contract Number: 1028389 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION (with delegated authority) Title: Title Assistant Commissioner or Assistant Division Director Date: Date: COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION By: As delegated to Materials Management Division Title By: Date: Date: Page 13 of 13 CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 04/10/2017) Page 1 of 4 MPC Program FY 2017-2022 Date: 04/20/2017 Exhibit A - Table of Tech Sery Used with TA98 Project IDs If a source code is not on this list, a work order is needed. Source .Cad,,� 0032 0152 0400 0600 1182 1312 1421 1434 1501 1513 1520 1716 1721 Business Unit Management All expenses of business/office managers for general management and administration of support functions. includes administering central facilities maintenance and facilities capital budgets. Support Services Work that supports general office management, system management such as entering data into SWIFT, PPMS, PUMA and other MnDOT systems, attending staff meetings and other indirect support activities. Equipment Calibration -Mat Insp Use when performing periodic equipment calibration for equipment used in the materials lab or on construction projects. General Training Attended All costs (time, registration, materials, travel expenses, etc.) for attending or participating informal or informal training, including conferences that primarily provide training. Soils/Foundation Field/Laboratory Tests All laboratory testing necessary to provide geotechnical information to complete roadway soils recommendations and approvals for use in the development of Final Design Plans and Special Provisions. Lab work includes R -value, resilient modulus, soil classification, gradation, proctor testing, unconfined compression, consolidation, direct simple shear, direct sheer, permeability and triaxial tests. Tech Assist -Outside MnDOT Use when providing technical assistance to an organization external to MnDOT. Bridge Management System Use for tasks related to the Bridge Management System, including operations, administration, or data entry. Operation/Administration/Data Structural Metals Inspection -Non DOT Reviewing shop drawings furnished by suppliers, fabricators, and contractors (working drawing or calculations), and for tasks related to structural metals inspection (materials surveys, physical and chemical laboratory testing, material inspection and engineering, and technical services in the field and offices) for local agency projects. Traffic Management System (TMS) Used by traffic operations staff for all tasks that support the RTMC's operations center (or TOCC) providing traveler information, managing incidents and monitoring the FMS. Includes dynamic message sign maintenance, ramp meter maintenance, camera maintenance, and loop detection activities. Includes maintenance activities related to any ITS or TMS device such as RTMC cables, monitor wall, switchers, routers, or modems. Use to record all costs for maintenance activities related to traffic management fiber optics. Use for tasks related to maintaining traffic operations software including minor software enhancements and fixes. Use when providing traffic operations technical assistance external to MnDOT. Traffic Management System (TMS) For tasks associated with the incorporation of new and existing TMS devices (cameras, loops, DMS, and other ITS devices) into Integration existing infrastructure to ensure proper operation. Use with the Construction/Program Delivery Appropriation. Pavement Management System For tasks related to the operation of the pavement management system, including development and maintenance/technical support. Includes tasks to meet needs external to MnDOT. Record Sampling Used by Materials and Research Section and district materials staff to verify inspector" sampling and testing procedures and checking inspectors' equipment during project construction as required by FHWA. Use when performing field tests on split sample. Traffic Sign Work Orders Use for work involved in preparing work orders for traffic signs. Use only with Maintenance Operations appropriation (T790081). If a source code is not on this list, a work order is needed. C:\Users\mcgiltay\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\11GPM1KX\Exhibit A - Table of Technical Services 04-20-2017 SJB .xlsx Page 2 of 4 MPC Program FY 2017-2022 Date: 04/20/2017 Exhibit A - Table of Tech Sery Used with TA98 Project IDs If a source code is not on this list, a work order is needed. Source If a source code is not on this list, a work order is needed. C:\Users\mcgiltay\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\11GPM1KX\Exhibit A - Table of Technical Services 04-20-2017 SJB .xlsx D 1732 Material Testing & Inspection Performing construction phase and research physical and chemical laboratory testing, and related technical services in the districts and central labs, and for performing research and construction phase non-destructive testing materials surveys, and related technical services in the field and offices. Includes detour surveys. Non-destructive tests include, skid resistance and falling weight deflectometer (FWD) testing. 1733 Concrete Plant Inspections Performing QA/QC physical testing at the plant; sampling and transporting of materials from the plant to the lab for lab testing, plant reviews, and operations; investigating plant discrepancies; and other technical services in the plant or office associated with stationary concrete plants or mobile concrete paving plant inspection. 1734 Construction Materials Inspections Performing construction phase material inspection and engineering, for structural steel, precast and pre -stressed concrete, reinforcement steel, and electrical products and related technical services in the field and office for materials to be used in multiple projects. Includes travel time, sampling, and sample delivery. Includes tasks related to reviewing shop drawings furnished by suppliers or fabricators and contractor working drawings or calculations, and for tasks related to structural metals inspection (materials surveys, physical and chemical laboratory testing, material inspection and engineering, and technical services in the field and offices). 1735 Bituminous Plant Inspection Performing QA/QC physical testing at the plant; sampling and transporting of materials from the plant to the lab for lab testing, plant reviews, and operations; investigating plant discrepancies; and other technical services in the plant or office associated with bituminous plant inspection. 1738 State Project - Specific Materials Performing material inspection for materials designated for a specific construction project (SP). Generally applies to inspection of Inspection such things as structural steel, prestressed concrete items, and most precast concrete items and for SP specific tasks related to structural metals inspection (materials surveys, physical and chemical laboratory testing, material inspection and engineering and technical services in the field and offices). 1800 Field Inspection Occasional construction project field inspection (not cyclical inspection of assets); Includes field inspection of materials such as gradations, densities/DCP, proctors, compaction, slump tests, and field air testsand collecting and transporting samples for lab tests, but not the actual laboratory verifications. 1870 Traffic Signal Maintenance This work will not substitute for or alter existing cooperative construction agreements or traffic signal maintenance agreements. Work related to the occasional repair and replacement of traffic signal system structures and all electrical maintenance for traffic signal systems including electrical power, labor, equipment materials, GSOC locates, traffic control and responses to public inquiries. 1871 Lighting Maintenance & Utilities All work related to installing, maintaining, restoring, or removing highway lighting systems and fixtures. Includes repairing, maintaining, or replacing supports necessary for roadway lighting luminaries. Includes patrol highway lighting, inspect lighting structures, electrical service for highway lighting, re-lamping, pump stations, anti -icing systems, truck roll-over warning systems and electrical repairs. Includes traffic control in support of roadway lighting activities. Use for tasks related to public inquiries/complaints, review utility billings, provide data, and conduct field reviews. 1875 Locate One Call Finding and marking locations of buried conduit, cables, hand holes, loops, etc. in order to maintain or repair the traffic management system, signal systems, or roadway lighting systems. If a source code is not on this list, a work order is needed. C:\Users\mcgiltay\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\11GPM1KX\Exhibit A - Table of Technical Services 04-20-2017 SJB .xlsx Page 3 of 4 MPC Program FY 2017-2022 Date: 04/20/2017 Exhibit A - Table of Tech Sery Used with TA98 Project IDs If a source code is not on this list, a work order is needed. Source .Call"� 1876 12102 12142 12210 2222 12316 12624 12629 12819 12820 Traffic Counting Use to record labor, equipment usage, and material costs for activities related to traffic counts made for statewide traffic monitoring or traffic operations. Includes all activities related to traffic counting, such as taking requests, assigning priorities, collecting field data, processing data, and developing new techniques for collection. Patching Related source type codes: 2103 -Heavy patching, 2104 -Bituminous paving, 2105 -Blow patching Overhead Sign Panel Maintenance Work related to the repair and replacement of overhead sign panels, extruded sign panels mounted on I -beams, and overhead sign structures. Includes related cable locates and traffic control. Does not include structural work. Guardrail-Install/Repair/Maintenance Install, repair, or maintain low tension cable, plate beams, and end treatments; cable tension adjustments; and reflector replacement. includes related traffic control. Sign/Delineation/Marker Repair Replacing, repairing, and washing signs (including temporary stop signs). Includes re -sequencing intersection signing and repair/replace overhead and extrude signs mounted on I -beams. Includes related cable locates and traffic control. Brush & Tree Removal Maintaining, watering, trimming, and removing highway right of way tree and brush. Includes chipping of tree limbs and stump removal/grinding. Includes related traffic control. Indirect Expense Indirect shop expenses and shop equipment. Allocate to mobile equipment. Supplies & Small Tools Shop tools, small equipment, and supplies that cannot be directly charged to a mobile equipment unit. Bridge Curb, Walk And Railing Repairing and maintaining bridge curb, walk, rail, coping, and fencing connected to the rail. Includes glare screen and median barriers on bridges. Includes related traffic control. Bridge Deck Work associated with bridge deck and slab repair regardless of removal depth or type of material used for patching. Includes deck or slab overlays and replacements and underside deck delamination. Includes related traffic control. 2822 Miscellaneous Bridge Maintenance This source code does not include replacement or major repair. Miscellaneous maintenance tasks performed on a specific bridge or structure not covered by other source codes. Includes minor repairs and simple fixes on items such as stairways, drains, fencing, light bases, transient guards, and access doors. Includes transient removal, ordering materials, and picking up equipment. Includes related traffic control. 2824 Bridge Inspection -Non -Federal All tasks related to inventory, inspection, and load capacity rating work done on trunk highway bridges to meet the requirements of the National Bridge Inspection System and/or Minnesota Bridge Safety Inspection Program or for billing to local governments. Includes related inspection reports and deck condition surveys. 12827 Bridge Expansion, Relief Joints All maintenance tasks associated with bridge expansion joints, except joint reestablishment. Includes tightening expansion device bolts and replacing seal glands. Includes related traffic control. 2828 Bridge Inspection -Federal Fund All bridge inspection tasks for non-MnDOT bridges funded by the federal Fracture -Critical Bridge Program (Project Code will begin with TSL and with the local bridge number). Includes related inspection reports. For MnDOT Trunk Highway bridges (Project Code begins with TSO followed by the bridge number) and local and Department of Natural Resources (DNR) (bridge number begins with 9A follow by bridge number) bridge inspections to be billed to the local government or Department of Natural Resources (DNR) use Source Code 2824. If a source code is not on this list, a work order is needed. C:\Users\mcgiltay\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\11GPM1KX\Exhibit A - Table of Technical Services 04-20-2017 SJB .xlsx Page 4 of 4 MPC Program FY 2017-2022 Date: 04/20/2017 Exhibit A - Table of Tech Sery Used with TA98 Project IDs If a source code is not on this list, a work order is needed. Source Q 2829 12830 12834 12838 12863 13000 3002 011IR 3009 3025 13027 13049 Bridge Superstructure All tasks to repair any bridge component above the bridge seat that is not included in other source codes. Includes repairs to all types of bridge superstructure elements such as girders, beams, floor beams, trusses, stringers, t -beams, precast channels, and box girders. Includes related traffic control. Bridge Bearing Assemblies All tasks related to the repair and maintenance of fixed or expansion -bearing assemblies on bridges. Includes related traffic Waterway Maintenance All tasks related to waterway maintenance for deck bridges. Includes debris removal, waterway cleanup, channel repair, and channel protection repair that is not part of slope protection. Includes related traffic control. Bridge Deck Crack Sealing All tasks related to deck crack sealing. Includes related traffic control. Traffic Signal Inspection Work related to cyclical structural and electrical inspection and preventive maintenance checks of traffic signal systems/structures. Includes labor, equipment, materials, and traffic control. Class Of Frequency Coordination Use for frequency coordination done with APCO, AASHTO or FCCA. Radio/Electronic Infrastructure Use for the repair and preventative maintenance of all equipment associated with wireless two-way radio communications systems (includes mobile radios, portable radios, base stations, console workstations, recorders, etc.). Non-MnDOT equipment - Must use Project number assigned to requesting agency; Department of Public Safety (DPS) includes State Patrol (SP) Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA), Fire Marshall); does not include Department of Natural Resources (DNR). See OSRC Project Radio - Mobile Equipment Use for the repair and preventative maintenance of all equipment associated with wireless two-way radio communications systems (includes mobile radios, portable radios, base stations, console workstations, recorders, etc.). Non-MnDOT equipment - Must use Project number assigned to requesting agency (State Patrol, DNR, BCA, Fire Marshall). See OSRC Project Code list. Radio/Electronic System Upgrade & Use for the installation and other services needed to provide major system upgrades or improvements to wireless or electronic Installation systems. Use for all work performed to correct or repair deficiencies found in a new installation. Tower/Building Maintenance Use for all tasks related to the maintenance of a tower building or site. Includes towers, buildings, generators, LP system, fencing, landscaping, grounding, ice bridge, cable management, climbing ladders, card key systems, and HVAC. Radio Programming Creating or modifying radio frequency programs and programming mobile and portable radios. Does not include mobile radios used as fixed base radios as part of the Inter -OP System (Use 3009). On Call Electronic Communications To be used by Statewide Radio Communications personnel to record on-call time. Infrastructure Maintenance If a source code is not on this list, a work order is needed. C:\Users\mcgiltay\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\11GPM1KX\Exhibit A - Table of Technical Services 04-20-2017 SJB .xlsx City Council Agenda: 06/12/17 2L. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-25 accepting a petition and calling for a public hearing for vacation of a portion of the drainage and utilitv easements for Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1 of Monticello Commerce Center Fifth Addition. Applicant: Laurentian Properties, LLC (AS/JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Laurentian Properties LLC has submitted a petition asking Council to call for a public hearing to consider vacation of a portion of drainage and utility easements across Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1, Monticello Commerce Center Fifth Addition. The vacation is being to allow the current owner to improve the two properties in accordance with a conditional use permit granted in 2016. The City previously approved an administrative lot combination which combined Lots 2 and 3 into a single parcel. The requested action would vacate the 12' drainage and utility easement lying between Lots 2 and 3, leaving the perimeter easements in place. Procedurally, Council must accept the petition and call for a public hearing to consider the vacation. Statute requires two weeks between the publication of notices and the public hearing itself. Therefore, Council should call for the public hearing for consideration of the vacations to be placed on the July 10, 2017 City Council agenda. City staff has prepared notices to be published in the Monticello Times and sent to affected property owners. Al. Budget Impact: There is no budget impact associated with calling for the hearing, as the notification expenses are covered through the application fee. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff impacts at this time are limited to the preparation of the notice documents. Should Council call for the hearing, staff will continue work on reviewing the vacation application. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2017- 25 accepting the petition and calling for a public hearing on Monday, July 10, 2017 to consider the vacation of a portion of drainage and utility easements over and across Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1 Monticello Commerce Center Fifth Addition. 2. Motion to not call for a public hearing at this time on the vacation request. City Council Agenda: 06/12/17 C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Resolution 2017-25 • Petition for Vacation • Easement Vacation Exhibit CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-25 RESOLUTION VACATING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR LOT 2 AND LOT 3, BLOCK 1, MONTICELLO COMMERCE CENTER FIFTH ADDITION WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 4152.851, after two (2) weeks published and posted notice of the hearing and after mailing written notice of the hearing at least ten (10) days before a hearing to each property owner affected by the proposed vacation; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the vacation of the Drainage and Utility Easements for Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1, Monticello Commerce Center Fifth Addition will be on Monday July 10, 2017 at 6:30 PM at the Monticello City Hall: Legal Description for Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement: That part of the 12.00 foot wide drainage and utility easement being centered on the lot line common to Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1, MONTICELLO COMMERCE CENTER FIFTH ADDITION, Wright County, Minnesota, lying easterly of a line distant 12.00 feet easterly of, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with the west lines of said Lot 2 and Lot 3, and lying westerly of a line distant 12.00 feet westerly of, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with the east line of said Lot 2 and Lot 3. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: that the above described drainage and utility easements are vacated. ADOPTED BY the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota this 12th day of June, 2017. 11/ CITY OF MONTICELLO Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator Brian Stumpf, Mayor April 26, 2017 TO: Community Development Director City of Monticello To Whom it may Concern: Laurentian Properties, LLC, fee owner of property located at 9696 Fallon Avenue, Monticello, MN 55362, (Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1, MONTICELLO COMMERCE CENTER FIFTH ADDITION), hereby petition on behalf of Laurentian Properties, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, for the vacation of the 12 foot wide drainage and utility easement running along the common line of said Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block I, MONTICELLO COMMERCE CENTER FIFTH ADDITION. Property Information: Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block I, MONTICELLO COMMERCE CENTER FIFTH ADDITION. Wright County, Minnesota, (Located In Section 13 Township 121 Range 25) Property ID Number(s): 155-131-001020 and 155-131-001030 Legal Description: That part of the 12 00 foot wide drainage and utility easement being centered on the lot line common to Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block I, MONTICELLO COMMERCE CENTER FIFTH ADDITION, Wright County, Minnesota, lying easterly of a line distant 12 00 feet easterly of, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with the west Imes of said Lot 2 and Lot 3, and lying westerly of a line distant 12.00 feet westerly of, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with the east lines of said Lot 2 and Lot 3. Thank You, LAURENTIAN P R' 'LLC By. Grant A. a.Wyagu.'en' Member/President �j yl 11 ^II — — — .1110.NOUS — — — — — — — PARMND LOT I POND I I SHED y I Bli ONO OFFICE PpR y i I STEEL FENCE I z — — — — — — — — — TRUCK SCALE l I An— ;\IIi:tLL:0 C0'rs1*n9tRCL'. C!rNI.FR THIRD ADDRION 1 BLOCK 2 NO. 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET \\ I ci z Vicinity Map NO SCALE MIS *0}', Z!]WAS RD 10 z CC ai o J SCHOOL LVD Z Z Z ILN— Project Location v, 4:J 4s •bI; DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS PER MONTICELLO COMMERCE CENTER FIFTH ADDITION ARE SHOWN AS THUS: ROAD R/W 12l 6--4 I� I � SIDE LT LINE I 2 -----I LI f+ -- REAR LOT LINE) I DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET Property Information: Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1, MONTICELLO COMMERCE CENTER FIFTH ADDITION, Wright County, Minnesota, (Located in Section 13 Township 121 Range 25) Property ID Number(s): 155-131-001020 and 155-131-001030 Legal Description: That part of the 12.00 foot wide drainage and utility easement being centered on the lot line common to Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1, MONTICELLO COMMERCE CENTER FIFTH ADDITION, Wright County, Minnesota, lying easterly of a line distant 12.00 feet easterly of, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with the west lines of said Lot 2 and Lot 3, and lying westerly of a line distant 12.00 feet westerly of, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with the east lines of said Lot 2 and Lot 3. jJj�yyffZ�7- Denotes easement area to be vacated REVISIONSAS OF DATE 1 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SURVEY, OR REPORT 13 North 11th Avenue WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION 320-259-1-259 288 MN 58303 AND THAT I AMA DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR 32UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. K -LD KRAMER LEAS DELEO �oM��LTr�L�o 5/24/2017 4URVEYI NO • EN D I NEERI Ne • PLANNINa Signature: BRAINERD ST. CLOUD Samuel J. DeLeo, MN License No. 40341 Date J PROJECT NO. INTER1001 { i EASEMENT VACATION DRAWING 9696 Fallon Ave. City of Monticello, County of Wright, State of Minnesota Located in Section 13, Township 121 North, Range 25 West City Council Agenda: 06/12/17 2M. Consideration of appointing representative to the Monticello Parks and Recreation Commission to fill vacancies (TP) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to appoint a representative to the newly created Parks and Recreation Commission. Karen Vetsch was originally appointed to the MCC Advisory Board which has been dissolved. The Parks and Recreation Commission approved her appointment and her first meeting is in July. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the appointment of Karen Vetsch to the Monticello Parks and Recreation Commission with her term ending December 31, 2019. 2. Motion to deny the appointment at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City Staff and the Monticello Parks and Recreation Commission recommend Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Application of new member APPLICATION FOR BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS Name I�re�`fuFs�l,. Address_ HomePhone -Cell Phone 5 -Mail Mont 'I If not otherwise specified, you must be a resident of the City of Monticello to serve on the following boards. Please circle the board(s) on which you are interested in serving. Industrial and Economic Development Committee (Does not require residency) City Planning Commission Library � Parks and Recreation Commission__,) Economic Development Authority (May not require residency) Transportation Advisory Committee Education Highest Level of Education Employment Current Employer, if appIicabIe*j,9;e V)4C Position/Title O r L L'� Dates of Employment (starting/ending) Ir P S -e Dates of Employment (starting/ending) Other Please describe in detail why you are interested in volunteering for the City of Monticello. -V U ply �.� �u� 4 L1Uc ,c.c r 05 Pease describe your prior volunteer experiences (inclu-de organization names a'ln dates of service) A -A bctt 0 C c �v List your qualifications for tappointment: 6,1aw bel i "PC� j Y\C CVV _v f o r -rd k v\.x-n L U V 'A ft�f ay, c References Please list three non -family members who can provide references on your ability to perform this volunteer positon: Name Phone Number Name— Phone Number Name Phone Number. Please read the following carefully before signing this application: I understand that this is an application for and not a commitment or promise of volunteer opportunity. I certify that I have and will provide information throughout the selection process, including on this application for a volunteer position and in interviews with the City of Monticello that is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge. I certify that I have and will answer all questions to the best of my ability and that I have not and will not withhold any information that would unfavorably affect my application for a volunteer position. I understand that information contained on my application will be verified by the City of Monticello. I understand that misrepresentation or omissions may be cause for my immediate rejection as an applicant for a volunteer position with the City of Monticello or my termination as a volunteer. Signature :m Date Return Completed Application to: Monticello City Hall, Attn: Human Resources, 505 Walnut St, Suite 1, Monticello, MN 55362 FAX: (763)295-4404 E-mail: HR@ci.monticello.mn.us Planning Commission Agenda — 06/06/2017 2N. Consideration to approve a request for Amendment to Mills Fleet Farm Planned Unit Development for proposed changes to signage. Applicant: Ramerth, Tim - Widseth Smith Nolting., (NAC) Property: Legal: Lot 1 and 2, Block 1, and Lot 2, Block 1, Mills Fleet Farm Addition Address: NA Planning Case Number: 2017-018 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND: Request(s): Application to revise and/or increase the approved signage on the main pylon from 199 square feet to 286 square feet, and wall signage by changing a wall sign on the principal building and adding an electronic digital message board, and the addition of two "Kerosene" signs on a canopy Deadline for Decision: July 10th, 2017 Land Use Designation: Places to Shop Zoning Designation: Mills Fleet Farm PUD District The purpose of the PUD, Planned Unit Development District is to provide greater flexibility in the development of neighborhoods and non-residential areas in order to maximize public values and achieve more creative development outcomes while remaining economically viable and marketable. This is achieved by undertaking a process that results in a development outcome exceeding that which is typically achievable through the conventional zoning district. The City reserves the right to deny the PUD rezoning and direct the developer to re -apply under the standard applicable zoning district. Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: Freeway Bonus Sign District Current Site Use: Retail Commercial (Under construction) Surrounding Land Uses: North: Interstate 94 Planning Commission Agenda — 06/06/2017 East: Industrial south of Chelsea Vacant Commercial north of Chelsea South: Industrial West: Industrial Project Description: The applicants received approval of a Planned Unit Development for platting and construction on the property in 2016. The approvals included construction of the principal building on Lot 1, Block 1, construction of the motor fuel station on Lot 2, Block 1, and construction of the main pylon sign on Lot 1, Block 2, north of Chelsea Road. The applicant is seeking an amendment to the PUD in order to accommodate changes to the signage on each of the three construction approvals. One of the wall signs on the principal building would be converted to a digital message display, and the size of the sign display on the main pylon would be increased from what was originally approved, as noted above. ANALYSIS When considering Planned Unit Development applications, the City's zoning ordinance is modified to accommodate flexibility from the typically applicable regulations to a design that is considered to meet the intentions of the Comprehensive Plan, but which varies from the strict zoning regulations. In this case, the applicant is seeking to modify approved signage applicable to the PUD, based on a review of the project as it nears completion. As noted previously, the applicants propose to increase the sign area of the main pylon from 199 square feet originally approved, to 286 square feet. The bulk of the increase would be to the center portion of the sign identifying the motor fuel station and gas price signage. Adding the previously approved space for up to two tenant identification signs on the main pylon (the plat reserves an outlot south of Chelsea, and area north of Chelsea) for future development), results in the proposed total of 286 square feet. The bulk of the signage on the property is not changing, and has been separately permitted. When the original sign plan was reviewed, the City identified the proposed sign to the Union Crossings sign north of I-94 as a comparable situation. That sign is approximately 400 square feet in area, and identifies a number of shopping center tenants, in lieu of several individual pylon signs throughout the project. The Union N Planning Commission Agenda — 06/06/2017 Crossings sign is 50 feet in height, the same as the approved Mills Fleet Farm pylon sign. Under the City's sign ordinance, the total allowable square footage of the main pylon and the motor fuel station monument sign would be 300 square feet (200 square feet for the pylon, and 100 square feet for the monument). The proposed signs total approximately 465 square feet. However, it is noted that the proposed pylon also includes space for the future tenants of the PUD, eliminating the possibility of separate pylon signage for those two other users (they may request monument signs under the City's sign regulations with a subsequent amendment to the PUD). As such, the proposed freestanding signage in the PUD would be consistent with the intent of the City's sign regulations, and consistent as well with the Union Crossings signage system. With regard to the proposed amendment to wall signs, the original PUD approvals indicated that the wall sign area was approximately 6% of the wall facing Chelsea Road, where the code allows as much as 15% of that silhouette space for signage. The addition of the "Auto Service Center" sign and digital display, does not measurably impact the allowable wall percentage. Staff included the changes in this PUD request since the static sign and digital display on the main store wall were not anticipated under the original approval. It is noted that the PUD now includes three digital display boards: the gas copy electronic signage on the pylon as proposed with this amendment; the electronic message board on the monument sign (as originally proposed and approved); and the electronic message board as proposed with this amendment, to be located on the main store wall. The applicant also proposes adding two signs on a canopy to identify a kerosene island. The signs are proposed to be illuminated and are approximately 15 square feet each. The addition of these signs would still keep the total wall signage well below the allowable sign percentage. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed this item on June 6th, 2017 and held a public hearing on the request. The applicant was present to address the Commission and provided an overview of the proposed sign changes. The applicant clarified that MnDOT has reviewed the proposed pylon and has determined it is considered an on -premise sign, requiring no permit through their office. No other members of the public were present to address the Commission on this item. 3 Planning Commission Agenda — 06/06/2017 The Commission unanimously recommended the amendment to PUD as proposed. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 6XX to approve the amendment to the Mills Fleet Farm PUD ordinance for sign allowances, per the submitted plans, based on the findings in Resolution No. PC -2017- 010, and incorporating the conditions of Exhibit Z of the staff report. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Ordinance No. 6XX for the amendment to the Mills Fleet Farm PUD ordinance for sign allowances, based on findings as stated at the public hearing. 3. Motion to table action on the Resolution, subject to additional information. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the resolution approving the changes. As noted in the report, the changes are consistent with the intent of the PUD, and with the comparable situation as applied to the Union Crossings development. With the conditions limiting further pylon sign construction in the PUD, the result should improve traffic visibility and minimize driver confusion in the Chelsea Road corridor. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Ordinance No 6XX, Draft B. Resolution PC -2017-010 C. Aerial Site Image D. Applicant Narrative E. Site Plan F. Exterior Building Elevation (wall signage amendment) G. Proposed Pylon (amendment) H. Proposed Pylon, Colored Elevation (amendment) I. Proposed Wall Signage (amendment) J. Proposed Canopy Signage (amendment) K. Proposed Monument (as originally approved, not proposed for amendment) L. Sign Tabulation Z. Conditions of Approval L! Planning Commission Agenda — 06/06/2017 EXHIBIT Z Amendment to Planned Unit Development Mills Fleet Farm Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, and Lot 1, Block 2, Mills Fleet Farm Addition Additional freestanding signs proposed for Outlot A and for Lot 1, Block 2 shall be of monument style only, consistent with the requirements of the sign regulations of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance and subject to an amendment to PUD at the time of development. 2. The applicant shall verify that the proposed signage is permissible per MnDOT and/or FWHA requirements based on the current plat and right of way configuration. 3. Comments of other City Staff and Planning Commission. 5 ORDINANCE NO. 670 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AMENDING THE MILLS FLEET FARM PUD AS A ZONING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, LOTS 1-2 AND OUTLOT A, BLOCK 1; AND LOT 1, BLOCK 2, MILLS FLEET FARM ADDITION TO MONTICELLO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS: Se ection 2.4(P) — Planned Unit Developments, Title 10 — Zoning Ordinance is here y a by adding the following: ( Mills Fleet Farm PUD District (b) Permitted Uses. Permitted principal uses in the Mills Fleet Farm PUD District shall be retail commercial uses as found in the B-4, Regional Business District of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, all uses subject to the approved Final Stage Development Plans dated July 19th, 2016, the amendment to Planned Unit Development dated June 121, 2017, and development agreement dated July 25th, 2016, amended October 2413, 2016 and as may be amended. The introduction of any other use from any district, including Conditional Uses in the B-4 District, shall be reviewed under the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 2, Section (0) —Planned Unit Developments for Development Stage PUD and Final Stage PUD. Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ORDINANCE NO. 670 ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this day of , 2017. ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, Administrator AYES: NAYS: Brian Stumpf, Mayor rd CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-010 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR MILLS FLEET FARM ADDITION TO MONTICELLO WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to Planned Unit Development property along Chelsea Road, including Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, and Lot 1, Block 2; and WHEREAS, the applicant is currently developing the property for a variety of retail purposes; and WHEREAS, the site is guided for commercial uses under the label "Places to Shop" in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD, along with the companion Plat, were found, as a part of the original PUD approval in 2016, to be consistent with the long-term use and development of the property for commercial uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 6, 2017 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The PUD amendment provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site. 2. The proposed signage is consistent with the direction of the Comprehensive Plan for shopping center retail development. 3. The improvements proposed for the site under the amended PUD are consistent with the intent of the zoning ordinance and with similar development in the City. 4. The improvements will not have impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 5. The PUD flexibility for the project for signage, is consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the PUD zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-010 Monticello City Council approves the amendment to the PUD, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z as follows: 1. Additional freestanding signs to be proposed for Outlot A and for Lot 1, Block 2 shall be of monument style only, consistent with the requirements of the sign regulations of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance and subject to an amendment to PUD at the time of development. 2. The applicant shall verify that the proposed signage is permissible per MnDOT and/or FWHA requirements based on the current plat and right of way configuration. 3. Comments of other City Staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 2017, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. PLANND By:j� Brad Tyle, Chair ATTEST: f 1-4 � f r Angela Sch ann, v ommunity Development Director K Ramerth, Tim, WSN -Request for Amendment to PUD Created by: City of Monticello Lt 1 & Lt 2, Blk 1, Lt 1,1311<2, and Outlot AM ills Fleet Farm Add to Monti 1310&320 Chelsea Rd KIWIDSETH SMITH V NOLTING May 8, 2017 City of Monticello Attn: Angela Schumann Community Development Director 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Mills Fleet Farm PUD Amendment — Ordinance No. 650 Dear Ms. Schumann, On behalf of Mills Fleet Farm (MFF), we are making a submission in request of an amendment to the PUD for Mills Fleet Farm Addition to Monticello (Ordinance No. 650). The PUD will remain the same, the only change requested is signage associated with the multi -tenant pylon sign adjacent to 1-94. The plans and specifications approved for the original PUD are on file at the City of Monticello, which are the current plans and specifications governing the construction that is underway. We have included the plan sheets that we are requesting a change to the approved PUD. Following is our PUD amendment request: PUD Flexibilitv Mills Fleet Farm Addition to Monticello is a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a multi -lot commercial shopping center that was approved by the City of Monticello on July 25, 2016. The intent was to consolidate signage within this PUD to minimize the number of freestanding signs that would be permitted. Under current ordinance, one freestanding sign would be allowed for each lot and this development falls within the Freeway Bonus District. The PUD was planned to utilize a single sign. The ordinance recognizes that special allowances are needed along the 1-94 corridor for effective communication to interstate travelers. We are requesting the fuel pricing sign be increased from 52 square feet to 139 square feet per side. An analysis was completed and it was determined that a 36"-48" character height is needed to be viewable from 1-94. This is dictated by the speed of traffic and the distance the sign is setback from the interstate. This sign is an additional 85 feet farther back from the interstate than the neighboring properties, as a utility easement has been provided adjacent to the 1-94 ROW line on the front portion of this property. The approved fuel pricing sign has a 24" character height, which is not adequate. 1. Mills has elected to change the character height of the fuel pricing to 36". This requires an increase of 87 square feet per side for the proposed pylon sign, which amounts to a total sign coverage of 286 square feet per side for the pylon sign, whereas the approved PUD has a total of 199 square feet of signage per side. 2. The PUD is a shopping center that is greater than 150,000 square feet and uses more than 20 acres for the site. Under the district regulations, the ordinance states that two pylon signs may be allowed if this criterion is met. The PUD utilizes a pylon sign and a KIWIDSETH SMITH V NOLTING monument sign. The pylon sign may have up to 300 square feet per side and be 32 feet in height and the monument sign can be 14 feet in height and have up to 100 square feet per side. The approved PUD consists of a pylon sign with a height of 50 feet and 199 square feet of sign area per side and a monument sign with a 15' 3" height and a sign area of 171 square feet per side. A total square footage allowed under ordinance for the two signs would be 800 square feet. What was approved was 742 square feet. What is now proposed is 914 square feet. The pylon sign structure will remain the same as approved in the PUD, the only change will be to the area that will be covered by signage on the pylon sign. 3. Under current ordinance, 3 additional freestanding signs could be allowed for a conventional lot and block subdivision, which would add another 1,200 square feet of signage in this location. A PUD was planned in lieu of a standard lot and block subdivision, which now restricts multi -tenant signage to the two signs approved in the PUD. 4. The signage on the buildings is substantially less than what is allowed by ordinance. Ordinance would allow up to 4,060 square feet (15% of wall area) of signage on the buildings, whereas we are only utilizing 1,037 square feet (4% of wall area). 5. A message board was considered for the pylon sign, but this alternative was rejected. Due to interstate speeds and setback from 1-94, the appropriate character height would only allow 2 lines of text with 9 characters in each row. It was not feasible to provide a message board of this size. The PUD utilizes flexibility, which remains consistent with the current request for increasing the fuel pricing sign size. This request is dictated by readability of the fuel pricing sign from 1-94. The PUD maintains signage that is substantially less that is allowed by ordinance and is consistent with the City's development objectives, comprehensive plan and rezoning approvals. We request to bring this PUD amendment to the next planning commission meeting scheduled for June 6, 2017. You may contact me at (218) 316-3653 or by email, tim.ramerth(o)-wsn.us.com or Mike Angland at (218) 316-3608 or by email, mike.angland(a-)-wsn.us.com should you have any questions or need any additional information. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, WIDSETH, SMITH & NOLTING ASSOCIATES, INC. o Timothy T. Ramerth, P.E. Project Manager cc. Hugh Leasum, Mills Properties LLC Chris Dolan, Fredrickson & Byron, PA Mike Angland, WSN Attch. Sheet A50.1 Signage 1.5 3.7 7'-0" 6'-6" 16'-0" 16'-0" 22'-6" / 33'-6" / 16'-6" /14'-0" ,9'-6" T.O. SII 167'-8' T 5 10 YP. A6.1 A6.1 T 86' - 0" V PRECAST 1 I� - �/ 1 0 8" I K Is� 60 (R lit N I I I zy)u _ B1 B2 B1 B2 B1 ( L ) (M ) NORTH ELEVATION 1 " = 30'-0" 47-F 0" B1 �B2 C SOUTH ELEVATION 1 " = 30'-0" 10 I O 9 8 7 476'— 0" 6 A6.1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II I I II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I I II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I 7.9 10 11 12 476'- 0" 7' - 6" 44' - 0" 34'- 6" 6'- 6', 32' - 6" 9' - 6" 34'- 0" 22'- 0" 18' - 0" 24' - 0" 16' - 0" I I I I I I S * N O 1 L 7 F\,Fhi E (Q) ( L 1 16" HIGH ADDRESS SIGN T. J. PRECAST15" HIGH LETTERS 133' - 8" TYP. dF 62-T.O. PRECAST 3-T.O. PRECAST H133' 8" 130'- 8" -T.O. PRECAST �II�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII111111111111111111I II 1 1 Illlllllll�llllhuu��I��.������ ' 126' 21/2" V III IIII ( I 0 AUTO NES P I 29" HIGH READER BOARD III ll� I IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII -----------� IIIIIII VIII��� 111111111111111111,00 ----1---- A l l i IN FINISH FLOOR � 1001-0 V B1 62 B1 8 B2 B1 A6.1 SIM. 6 5 4 3 2 I �BLO N I I I I JI IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIII 3'- 4" r9' - 0„ 1-T.O. PRECAST 126'-21/ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII lil�� ; ;���IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III1°�IIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIGIIII°°°Illlli�i�'�i�lllllllllllllllllllllll�lllllllll ,'RETAINING WALL Fa.o�o....o1001-01,ti H) 356'— o" OF \ J T.O. SILO - 167' - 8" N 21' - 10" 3-T.O. PRECAST 133'- 8" I J D H 2-T.O. PRECAST 11F0 130' 8" � 0 I III II (IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII l ALITO-17 CIE � �ILI "L- L -I- I -V--A C3WEST ELEVATION -) 1 99 — 30'-011 I I I 3 Al2.3 �9'-0'� 24'-0" J H SIM .. TYP. OF 6 1-T.O. PRECAST 2 1/2" .�IIII � II II II .......i il126' uN6: T.O. SMOOTH FINISH In_iniInrtnnii¶illll-ll�lllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll � I II� 1111/�IIII 114'- 0" 7077-07 10-77_75 90 99 9E 9� ' 90 V IFm--- L71- /F\� COMPACTOR ®EAST ELEVATION 1if= 301-011 F E 356'- 0" J IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII B2 8 24'-0" 9'- 0' A A6.1 / TYP. 1-T.O. PRECAST 411111_'� 126' - 2 1/2" \l IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II � II II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I I I R I I I I SEE[ 'ICAL FOR LOCATION'QUANTITY PATTERNED PRE,AS- LIGHT FIXTURE SMOOTH SURFACE S O I � L -L FINISH FLOOR N 100' - 0" B1 O6.1 B A.7 A.2 A T.O. SILO 167'- 8" _PRECAST 133'133' - 8" PRECAST 130'- 8" 1 I d LIGHT ACCENT DETAIL LL W F w > it of LL N Z LL PRE -CAST CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE TOP 9" OF HIGH RIBS TO ACCOMMODATE METAL FLASHING (NOT SHOWN), AND 72" AT ROOF OVERHANG A 9� HIGH RIB PANEL DETAIL �J 1/2" 11 -off PREFINISHED METAL SILO DOME (ORANGE) DARK BROWN PAINT - (SEE COLOR SCHEDULE FOR FORMULA EIFS - PREMIXED INTEGRAL COLOR (COFFEE MILK) RANDOM RIB EXPOSURE EXPOSED BAND RANDOM RIB EXPOSURE 32"X32" STACKED PATTERN EXPOSED FIELD VERIFY FOR EVEN 12" +/- TYP. VERTICAL LAYOUT AROUND PERIMETER OJ LL }U LL E Lou > 3-T.O. PRECAST i 126' - 2 1/2" 133' - 8" V T.O. EXPOSED ,aN5 D o� " a 2-T.O. PRECASTAL N, T.O. RANDOM RIB 130'- 8" 120'- 5" 'v Q2H= 0 A.7 I am=p 0 z_ o -u) x T.O. WINDOW xwpp H0 ZZ a 0' 122'- 10" N H d Q H a w z ow >_ d O F J U) NN wU)5 w 5z 01 Q T.O. EXPOSED BAND COLOR TO MATCH COPING LL 12Z of ma�w0 w Q LL #1060 -PLUM �r ' B.O. WINDOW _ 20" TALL X 6" DEEP w x � -U - —OpJfn - LETTER SIGNAGE ON P 99� O� _ �Lu_ PRECAST CONCRETE DECORATIVE PANELS #1013 -BUFF mw o D u) O O A � �0�1ij vN m FINISH FLS 100' - 0" T.O. RANDOM RIB 0 SMOOTH FINISH DISPLAY WINDOWS � �5J 1/8" = 1'-0" °" M METAL TRIM PREFINISHED METAL SILO DOME (ORANGE) DARK BROWN PAINT - (SEE COLOR SCHEDULE FOR FORMULA EIFS - PREMIXED INTEGRAL COLOR (COFFEE MILK) RANDOM RIB EXPOSURE EXPOSED BAND RANDOM RIB EXPOSURE 32"X32" STACKED PATTERN EXPOSED FIELD VERIFY FOR EVEN 12" +/- TYP. VERTICAL LAYOUT AROUND PERIMETER OJ LL }U LL E Lou > V -JOINTS EIFS ACCENT PATTERN 1/2 1 0 1-T.O. PRECASq UD=p0 126' - 2 1/2" T.O. EXPOSED ,aN5 D o� " a 122' - V N, T.O. RANDOM RIB Z O Q W 120'- 5" Q2H= o A.7 am=p �o�_w o SYMBOL 1 MATERIAL xwpp H0 ZZ a 1BASE REMARKS N H d Q a = w Z H F z >_ d O F J NN wU)5 w 5z 01 Q T.O. EXPOSED BAND COLOR TO MATCH COPING U S Q 12Z ma�w0 w Q PRECAST CONCRETE PANELS #1060 -PLUM LU w�ww< U _ 20" TALL X 6" DEEP V -JOINTS EIFS ACCENT PATTERN 1/2 1 0 T.O. STACKED RIB BAND 108'- 8" 00 FINISH FLOOR 1001-01, Z E 0 a� 99999999999. � WLI z Lo O6 PRECASTACCENT PATTERN ° = 'yco 1/8 — 11 -off LU LL9 � >_LL* of O_, LLQ >_F 1� > oz0 JI W>r Q LLWJ U / a co 1-T.O. PRECASq UD=p0 126' - 2 1/2" T.O. EXPOSED ,aN5 D o� " a 122' - V N, T.O. RANDOM RIB Z O Q W 120'- 5" T.O. STACKED RIB BAND 108'- 8" 00 FINISH FLOOR 1001-01, Z E 0 a� 99999999999. � WLI z Lo O6 PRECASTACCENT PATTERN ° = 'yco 1/8 — 11 -off LU LL9 � >_LL* of O_, LLQ >_F 1� > oz0 JI W>r Q LLWJ U / a co EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE UD=p0 U J >�> d 0 Q Z O Q W p o 9n Q2H= o A.7 am=p �o�_w o SYMBOL 1 MATERIAL xwpp H0 ZZ FINISH 1BASE REMARKS N H d Q a = w Z H F z >_ d O F J wU)5 w 5z 01 Q T.O. EXPOSED BAND COLOR TO MATCH COPING U S Q 12Z ma�w0 w Q PRECAST CONCRETE PANELS #1060 -PLUM LU w�ww< U _ 20" TALL X 6" DEEP w x � -U - —OpJfn - LETTER SIGNAGE ON 99� _ 6" PAINTED RACEWAY L Q Q QL U) 00 B2 PRECAST CONCRETE DECORATIVE PANELS #1013 -BUFF EXPOSED AGGREGATE - Q U2 O O A � m T.O. RANDOM RIB 0 120' - 5" � °" M METAL TRIM SEE PREFINISHED uj W Z liJ W 3: C0 Q U U x Z p SPECIFICATION W O Cn p Z � O ALUMINUM ENTRANCES &STOREFRONT O N co co PREFINISHED OM w ii�*i EXTERIOR SIGNAGE DETAIL STEEL DOORFRAME 01- PAINT 3/4" 3/4" = 1'-0" > N M 7Of OSECTIONAL Nw SEE SPECIFICATION PREFINISHED EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE CD w � rn Q p o 9n SYMBOL 1 MATERIAL COLOR 1 1 FINISH 1BASE REMARKS N o O A SCUPPER COLOR TO MATCH COPING PREFINSHED O ~O 61 O PRECAST CONCRETE PANELS #1060 -PLUM EXPOSED AGGREGATE CO o N N cu U N — a O m �c J fnQ _ B2 PRECAST CONCRETE DECORATIVE PANELS #1013 -BUFF EXPOSED AGGREGATE Q U2 O OC POURED CONCRETE m w D O M METAL TRIM SEE PREFINISHED uj Z liJ W 3: C0 Q U U x Z SPECIFICATION O Cn p U � O ALUMINUM ENTRANCES &STOREFRONT SEE SPECIFICATION PREFINISHED O STEEL DOORFRAME SEE SPECIFICATION PAINT M OSECTIONAL OVERHEAD DOOR SEE SPECIFICATION PREFINISHED O SIGNAGE VERIFY COLORS W/ ARCHITECT O OJ EPDM MEMBRANE Q OFLAG POLE DARK BRONZE ALUMINUM z OPRECAST CONCRETE DECORATIVE PANELS WHITE/STAINED EXPOSED AGGREGATE 4'X4'+/- PATTERN, 3/4" V-GROOVE/SMOOTH M O EIFS PLASTER SEE SPECIFICATION SAND BLAST 8"X16" BLOCK PATTERN - PAINTED O � ON SILO DOME - SHEET METAL SEE PREFINISHED SPECIFICATION OP ALUMINUM DISPLAY WINDOWS SEE SPECIFICATION PREFINISHED V J H O in Z OQ KNOX BOX PREFINISHED J w O_ w Z II.— OR OVERHEAD FRAMING & DECK SEE SPECIFICATION PAINT Q % O NOT USED ~ w W 0- O J J w cl) W 0 w 0 OT PRECAST CONCRETE DECORATIVE PANELS WHITE EXPOSED AGGREGATE 3'-3"X3'-3" +/- PATTERN, 3/4" V -GROOVE _j oIf LL a U O � Z z W NOTES: & FINISHES BY ARCHITECT. PAINT ALL LOUVERS, PIPING EQUIPMENT TO MATCH ALL ADJACENT WALL/ROOF/SOFFIT J J — — 0 x 1. COLORS GRILLES, & � � � W SURFACE UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE. (09 9000) 2. TYPICAL OF ALL OVERHEAD DOOR NUMBERS: � -OVERHEAD DOOR NUMBERS ARE MOLDED PLASTIC SIGNAGE � SHEET NO. A6.1 5/4/2017 2:59:57 PM © 2016 WIDSETH SMITH NOLTING SHEET OF 0 N c INTERNALLY LIT CABINET N ACCESS PANEL (ONE SIDE ONLY, SEE SPECS.) 20'-8 1' 4" 18'-0 2^ / FINISHED DIMENSION MILLS � FLEET FARM; GAS 9 = d o 10 - CAR WASH LREGI- -7-T-TI L TENANT- ----------------- 11 -, - TENANT71-17 7 7 T T 7 El- =,� ----------------------------------------------- LL--------------------------------------------------------L 0 MAIN STORE PYLON SIGN EAST/WEST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" INTERNALLY LIT SILO CAP DARK BROWN PAINT (SEE COLOR SCHEDULE FOR FORMULA) EIFS - PREMIXED INTEGRAL COLOR (COFFEE MILK) SIGN CABINET OPEN CHANNEL LETTERS AND LOGO LED ELECTRONIC GAS PRICE DISPLAY EIFS W/ 8" X 16" STACKED BOND PATTERN AS SHOWN SIGN FOOTINGS SEE STRUCTURAL A 0 0 N 4 0 M 1" EIFS SYSTEM 12" PRECAST WALL PANEL X X X X X X Y X Y X Y X Y X Y X X X X X X X X X X ------------------ N Y X Y(X ------ 4 XXXXXd d0 C pQ / d °4 p ° d ° N d d p 4 p 4 ° d p d d 4 / d d d p 4 p p p d 4 r p ° p ° d d ° p 4 6'-8" 4'-6 1'-4" / FINISHED I DIMENSION INTERNALLY LIT SILO CAP ACCESS PANEL (ONE SIDE ONLY, SEE SPECS.) DARK BROWN PAINT (SEE COLOR SCHEDULE FOR FORMULA) EIFS - PREMIXED INTEGRAL COLOR (COFFEE MILK) --w SIGN CABINET s ACCESS PANEL (ONE SIDE ONLY, SEE SPECS.) EIFS W/ 8" X 16" STACKED BOND PATTERN AS SHOWN r-------------------- ---------- -------------------- L ----------------------------------------------------L 0MAIN STORE PYLON SIGN NORTH/SOUTH ELEVATION 2 1/4" = 1'-0" M 19' -2" D M MILLS ELECTRICAL CONDUIT FOR SIGNAGE 8" PRECAST WALL PAN --- 4 O ° O H O J O C) Lu Z d LLL O 4 p O _ rn O O d d a- L0 J co J ° a U ¢ o d 44 2 m w N } In d m ° ui 4° v z d ° a x O 0 U 0 d d p 4 ° d 4 ° PRECAST DETAIL 6 3/4.. _ 1,-0" / PREFINISHED METAL COPING U (2) LAYERS 3/4" TREATED PLYWOOD W a � as C7 z_ 4 a O d U d co p ° V 8" PRECAST PANELS COPING DETAIL 5 3/4„ = 1,-011 PREFINISHED METAL COPING '-3.. / 5-0" 5 3"-0" / A50.1 r I 3" d a 1, p d Q 4 4 4 PREFINISHED p a METAL COPING p a p 4 4 p 4 d ti 0 H Z W 0 1/2" SEALANT w/ BACKER ROD ALL FAMIR AROUND SIGN _ 2,399 REG, Gas o m j ELECTRICAL I � DISCONNECT MESSAGE CENTER CA 6 R WASH -- 6'-0" �� A50.1 co 10'-0" 6 8'-0" Z ----------------------- SIGN FOOTINGS i SEE STRUCTURAL L -1 0 MAIN STORE MONUMENT SIGN EAST/WEST ELEVATION 01/4" J:\01156-MILLS\011560070-Monticello\011560070.000-New Store\CADD\ARCH\Exterior Signage\A-SIGNS-50-1-Monticello.dwg Plotted by:Tim Ramerth 5/5/2017 7:09:18 AM ©2017 WIDSETH SMITH NOLTING V ZN E i ♦�W - V♦ to W m7? w K z H O ¢ w o azo wOU co 7 pbf_j O Z O�� U �z U 12f J UU p to u-WZ U �_ x N 0- U N U w 0 z � 2 W CL 0 Of U ¢ H z ¢ =moo 0U) O 2 U D }mJ0 z¢ LL 0J w of z z w¢¢� ¢ U a w 000,¢0 w Ofa�� _ U U ¢ _ Z: H U LL W m � U z O F- U) U w 0 Uw Z> O o ¢ U z WFn 00 � a cf) x Ofaw N w �r p t; N N M �LO O O H O J O C) Lu Z o z LLL O � O _ rn O O m N m a- L0 J co J J a U ¢ o J 0 2 m w N } In NO. m o ui v z a U a x O 0 U 0 U H J O Lu Z LLL H r W a O O LLI ILL a- U W C ') J J Z Z J_ J 0 C7 2 N SHEET NO. A50.1 \ Z bA • I \ a , , , I N r l l l l l l� I I I I I I I I I I I I III I I I III i i �,,.,,., ;• ,,; ,'''`;� _ i IIIII IIIIII F" TI' Q III I, cn rI ----------------- K _------------------------------ — - xb 1 --- ------------- I I �� I I I I I I w Ln w \ / '• c \ II IL---------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- L / \ 1 I I I Li LIwzw I I I i iII i i 6 \ UJ oz oc --— —00f W5 WW 0 J / c 11 T1 t =�" I------------------- –___l J ---------------- �_1_ _ , / // \ O O J I I I I I I I ----- —3— _ I , i,; .. �,,_�.. - : , ;f, i ,�.' r.�•, : t. =1' _M1: .•,�.;: ....... -: ",'Aa's '•'d�!>�.'..;,... � tl � ' / / LL W Q N ;,'°..it r. al ,r.:<` i, .• `.i:. .ti. .t^t.,. •l:v ..f.•t; i^•Gi '1. / (n — z O =Xw0 / \\ I I I I �:.'..�' / / ''• / pew 1t I ti; I / / ^• �; /�/ / / 2�UF w LLJ wUQw x I I .'Ti i t � r W w� I cn 1 / r I 0) %�i ' :�. ,:: I LOT 1 % \ 0 BLOCK 2lot' --------------- -- I a LU it OLU� • I I \ \ \ \\ / O � I I.I / ^ f ----� CN — I LL IIV :: %: I 8 / ' a LU O I I - ♦I r N I I I -_ - - j`f I OUTLOT A p f CD p o Z O C) I I I I w:. �, I I ■ / N O m LID 4LLJ � w O CO w I / , zww VJ------------------------------- m I Ivi � Q Q w D �..❑ I � � D U o U � �O00 c.� Of -. I I ' C i w' ': µ:,•'„ i .J L ) r 1,— -I I ' 0 i i .i-t.c :. r ..i � I:. i . i �. i - r, •►- n. �� ( I ' ----- ----- / I `\ I �' i.i� `J - ; i `- is '`.I rJ.•,.: I,-1�:: � ��'..S•-1-:'I��.I.�� �� I 'I / I VV, I / L ----L---------\- - ------------------ / –-------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------ --- o c� 1 / � 1 I l� l l s i ii I I / / v~ X J c W i I I I I I I I I� I I I I I I I I / / / J w o II I I I I I I _Z cn LLJ / aLLJ W / / I cp LLz:= / w a- O / I NORTH i O-1 Z J All' LL a- U J ETA a / J J Z W ' I 080 160 2 to I I I SCALE IN FEET) SHEET NO. C3.0 J:\0115B-MILLS\011580070-Monticello\0115B0070.000-New Store\CADD\CIVIL\CO3-SP-0115B0070.dwg Plotted by: Mike Rude 1/27/2017 1:37:39 PM © 2017 WIDSETH SMITH NOLTING PROPOSED SIDEWALK EASMENT I I SEE CHELSEA ROAD TURN LANE PLAN SHEET FOR DIMENSION DETAILS MONUMENT SIGN L (SEE SHEET A50.1 & S50.1) 2 .49"' \o \o \ \o \o \°\o / \ ' O ' o , 's \ \ ° \ / DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT / O \ O / O / O \ 16'R (TYP.) / 25'R / / 6" CLASS 5 DRIVE 0, / DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.) PROPOSED TRAIL EASEMENT PROPERTY BOUNDARY (TYP.) DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.) PEDESTRIAN RAMP SEE NOTE 4 NOTES: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. ALL CURB RADII ARE 5' TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. ALL CURB TO MEET MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIFICATIONS FOR A TYPE "B618 CURB & GUTTER" OR "S518 CURB & GUTTER". 4. CONSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN RAMPS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 LEGEND: B618 CURB & GUTTER S518 CURB & GUTTER Z 2 W D ILL] \ v \ N\ \ \ } \ m \ Z \ O \ a \ 0 O W p I cro 0 > I � 0 H 0 z 0 40 80 i SCALE ( IN FEET) \ J:\0115B-MILLS\0115B0070-Monticello\0115B0070.000-New Store\CADD\CIVIL\CO3-SP-0115B0070.dwg Plotted by: Mike Rude 1/27/2017 1:37:42 PM © 2017 WIDSETH SMITH NOLTING .p Z 0-1 Q� LL Q Jw0Z H F W W mOf<_ �a�J Q W (0 Z p I O Z rn 00 D w m iw� w o Z w W a Z U Z Z p W (0 W Q O N Q 0 O O O K W Z H q d Q p LL w O p O (� w � U w p J 2 Of p LL p 0 CL H w w I Q x O_ EL W Lu Q H z U- u W of Uj(0 } } CO w m m Q Z O p N ?: O Z � N Q U Of O � p (n p O O H O LIL O Lu z O w oN Z O O 3: U J O rn O J 00 N = Ln J () a W r Z, u) W W n ¢ 2 2 O SHEET NO. C3.1 } } CO w m m p Z O Lu ?: O Z U) Q U Of x O p (n p O SHEET NO. C3.1 Q ~ U J O - w U) z H O LIL Lu z w ' LLJ O z 0- U J LL J co a z W J_ J 0 2 2 2 SHEET NO. C3.1 108.29' BACK OF CURB 30' R / ..•' �: �� LEGEND: \ B618 CURB & GUTTER r SO p� �r��� _ _PEDESTRIAN RAMP � �- • / '� SEE NOTE 4 /�° ,/ S518 CURB &GUTTER I I ' / 10 R PEDESTRIAN RAMP WITH 24 I I �00' TRUNCATED DOMES ' • . ' ' ' F F SEE NOTE 4 • ° KEROSENE ISLAND I I pv I I (SEE KEROSENE CANOPY SECTIONS, p/ I I •° I DETAILS AND PHOTOS) I / S I i o 0 5' VALLEY GUTTER SEE DETAIL % PROPOSED SIDEWALK EASEMENT I I I e TANK FARM of R 30' R �' %i PEDESTRIAN RAMP I ' ' SEE NOTE 4 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.) j/ ! I 5' VALLEY GUTTER ; SEE DETAIL DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE 30' R / (SEE DUMPSTER PAD & ♦ ❑ I DUMPSTER GATE DETAILS) IRRIGATION SLEEVE (TYP.) — -- — 20' R 15' R 20'R y x 4 I I ' / �_ I — — J - / - 4m I A _ -n o ' — — — — ; --- ------- I/ o ----------------------- jl I I I 40.00' TYP. 15 R li i o ice-- -I 20.00' O- LIGHT POLE (TYP.) I I I ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ I I ❑ I I I I LIGHT POLE (TYP.) �x sem_ f Ak♦ i f a T I 24. CSS F F _ UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.) 1 24.00' TYP. - PROPERTY i I I I i 1 BOUNDARY I I 24 SQ. FT. TRUNCATED o DOMES (SEE NOTE 4) Q.� NOTES: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 2. ALL CURB RADII ARE 5' TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 3. ALL CURB TO MEET MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIFICATIONS FOR A TYPE "B618 CURB & GUTTER" OR "S518 CURB & GUTTER". 4. CONSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN RAMPS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 s\ PEDESTRIAN RAMP SEE NOTE 4 -A:po I O - CENTER WITH BUILDING ENTRY 40 )0' 48 SQ. FT. TRUNCATED F F �s I I I 1 I DOMES (SEE NOTE 4) n ❑ ❑ ❑ - CENTER WITH BUILDING ENTRY El SEASONAL DISPLAY AREA I I I I I I ♦❑ I y M (GARDEN CENTER) MOTORCYCLE PAD N N N N N N N N III N w w w w w w ww I I SEE PAVING PLAN o U I I I C)CD I I NN a 40.00 TYP. A ----------- --- N a I �LLo u o ° T� L °� � —_—cn II, 112.83' BACK OF CURB � — — - II _ _ `• — I o,.y ,, ---- � 10' R 'I � — - J STI o~ ♦ I 20.00' o♦ o j I I ------ -- ------- -----—o--- --- * I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I — I I 30' R� = 22.00' BACK OF� I I - II / I I / I I — —1— — — —�o — — — oo - I I -- i i i i♦ i -I w ♦ I I �0'R I •� mill. ~ ~ / �.. �- - - --- mo--� 5 o - - - - -----'10`R 7 — 34 R - o,n --------------- a, ' 143.1 U' - .'r- f 12.00' 24.00 C� p {I ----------- ---- --_ _-------------- —/— --1 - - - I / • r - ,� l t7 •�° T !1 FLAGPOLE 1 0 l (SEE FLAGPOLE BASE DECORATIVE WROUGHT o 3b 0� _ OUTDOOR MERCHANDISE SECTION AND PLAN DETAIL) IRON FENCE r� AND TRAILER DISPLAY AREA - _ _ OUTDOOR MERCHANDISE I - - I ! AND TRAILER DISPLAY AREA 147.97' / — N ti o —4 I I I I I I 1 I II 24.00' I I I I I : � I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2 W ILL] ENTRANCE GATE HUT AND DECORATIVE GATE SEE: ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SHEETS II - DECORATIVE i WROUGHT IRON FENCE PROPERTY BOUNDARY ■ I I 20.50 EDI3E OF BITUMINOU7 30'R I I I I i 125.00' 18.7 GALVANIZED CHAIN LINK FENCE j sCly O � `�j ; s0._ � i 1° ° ° • .e . a° ,a ,, a. : • °. O 0 40 80 MILLS FLEET FARM z \� SCALE ( IN FEET) �� I `r' 0 165,296 S.F. ,� II o F --- -------J Am r J:\011513-MILLS\0115130070-f onticello\0115BO.00"wS4Qce\QADD\bbl \ 73'SP-D115EZ 77)'dwg as 'Plot Icy: Vlik,� Rud 1/27/01 7 1:37 44 PM 2017 WIDEI H SMITH NOLTING O O Of z 0-1 d Z 0 rn W f 0>� O O�w W, z U H (1) z J Qw cD AwaN 0- OQ ° O Q�0ZLi J w ° z Q ( d 0 �((LL O�wo Fww �m}w w � 0 LL w v CL O w mOfQ� w �a�- ' _ Q O_ _ 3:H H 2 m Q� Of } Q w w co w 2 z 0 n EE O Lu 0 z 0 LLJ Q co Q U C, N O N W z � w 0 0 0 W C H U o z 0 w 0 LLJ O Z N T L0m J ri) w w J J LU W a Z o J_ J O m w 2 m CO W Lu Lu -j U z Q U of = O 0 W 0 ° SHEET NO. C3.2 ■ Q ~ U J O w z H w Z W W H U w LLJ O Z 0- J LL U J J a Z W J_ J O 11-- 2 Fn SHEET NO. C3.2 ■ v I � � I � .,vim , � I I ° _ ° ° _ _ • — - ; IIS MILLS FLEET FARM ° CONCRETE SPILLWAY 165,296 S.F. -n SEE DETAIL a ° - D Ill 8 9 DECORATIVE WROUGHT IRON bs. •�_ _ ° _ _ FENCE WITH 16' GATE ,` • 147.97' , _ -125.00' ° - - c- 18. 4� i j I I .•. - I I 81.79 v GALVANIZED CHAIN LINK FENCE 20.00 = _ . '� ; - - . ° � I ; _ ° . � � GALVANIZED CHAIN LINK FENCE - • - -4GENERATOR & TRANSFORMER PAD p o I � _ (SEE GENERATOR PAD SECTION DETAIL) •I� v °t - •IIS ^I -w'- - ° - - - a- a'o, .I -.o. . P '° -`a: .. UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.) •v'. °s. PO o rp a ° 0" ° v it 20.00' ,�' .a I� A- •c .v. a• > `u _ - i - °.d' .ti =s" ..-', .-r •.' ..P- - t -+,v - v . d'` . i,. -. .. - : i •v •. v ' v"p - .. ` . _ ''b '► s 94.00' 48.50' { I --- ----- --J -------- --- -- I PROPERTY _______ �• --- -----------------------------------� - --;_°.-- - --- ---------- 210.00' � I BOUNDARY .IM — — J ------------------ r------------------ �_------------ D 13.83 h 1.50' 52. 176.11 EDGE OF BITUMINOUS Yr `I I 478.00' L ----J coor I N I I CNC)O ACCESS RY BUILDING PROPERTY BOUND � 1 X1,583 S.F. II AL � I N DRAINAGE AND UTILITY `T EASEMENT (TYP.) OD I �'- 20.50' EDGE OF BITUMINOUS m I I -n LIGHT POLE (TYP.) c c O P — I r— U) -- --- ---- — Qo Q0 m co Z D O co O Z w G7 O ccn EX STING DRAINAGE EASEMENT n m O O D ;U U)DRAINAGE EASEMENT PROPOSED I � I Z � —i �/ I C ----------------- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - � - +- - ' ---------------------------------------T- ----------- - I C II II II I —J -- -- ---- ---- -- - -- ---- -- - -- -- --------- - ---- -- - -- ---- -- - -- -- NOTES: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. ALL CURB RADII ARE 5' TO BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. ALL CURB TO MEET MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIFICATIONS FOR A TYPE "B618 CURB & GUTTER" OR "S518 CURB & GUTTER". 4. CONSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN RAMPS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 LEGEND: B618 CURB & GUTTER S518 CURB & GUTTER 0 40 80 1 _ 1 SCALE ( IN FEET) 6MI 2 W o >� W OfZa, d Z 0 rn aw0z 00 �>� o 0aw Z ww jiOU � (1) Z J Q�W (0 wWQ If zN Q O a- 1,1) ° O Q�0Z �wOZ �9o w pew F U } m } w w wOJ= VYY 0 of ow w Of vO CL w m�Q� w waw x U U_ Q T-� H H � w W mL� Z 0 a U U) LU 0 Z 0 H Of LLJ Q ~ Q cq � N I� � N o � � W Z o r 0 C O w o Z O 0 W O J N T L0m J (j) a a li IZ U J U) Q P: a J J Z W J_ J m m W m 2 2 2 W Lu U Z W ca Q U Of x O o W 0 U Ik z 0 A J:\0115B-MILLS\0115B0070-Monticello\0115B0070.000-New Store\CADD\CIVIL\CO3-SP-0115B0070.dwg Plotted by: Mike Rude 1/27/2017 1:37:47 PM © 2017 WIDSETH SMITH NOLTING SHEET NO. C3.3 ■ Q ~ U J O - W W Z H � w c0 W J J Of W Q li IZ U J U) U) P: a J J Z W J_ J O 2 2 2 SHEET NO. C3.3 ■ IF YOU CAN SEE THIS TEXT THIS ARTWORK IS NOT PRINTED TO SCALE EiE➢ m CO _1 L: N EIFS BY OTHERS EIFS W/ 8" X 16" STACKED BOND PATTERN AS SHOWN ACCESS PANEL L� -� L------------- 10 MAIN -- 10MAIN STORE MONUMENT SIGN EASTMEST ELEVATION EIFS W/ 8" X 16" STACKED BOND PATTERN AS SHOWN 4'1" 1,-3„ ' FINISHED DIMENSION = d y0 FINISHED STEEL FRAMEWORK, PRIMED AND PAINTED. DIMENSION w _ MOUNT TO TOP OF STEEL STRUCTURE WHITE COOLEY BRIE FACES WITH z� 3M 3630-44 0 ?ANGI TRANSLUCENT zo ow `` E 1a E 04 oN d �3 4 011G / VIN" LAPLLIED - _� wz r .040 ALUMINUM PAINTED WITH GRIP GUARD mw QOM J J lr c.7 O CD eucKAN • POLYURETHANE TO MATCH H cc 3g <imLL VALSPAR FWROPEN ORANGE 4346114. cn U r W cs T v pz F QwO ZO �'– y U . 0 mo wF E a� R� ofmN� m�n� O ~ INTERNALLY LIT SILO CAP 3 ED ~¢¢ NZ �olU INTERNALLY LIT SILO CAP J J� ACCESS SS PANEL CIE;U (ONE SIDE ONLY, SEE SEE P`ON DETAIL LASHING y DARK BROWN PAINT (SEE COLOR SCHEDULE FOR FORMULA) APPLIED BY SPECS.) 1— TTN EIFS CONTRACTOR PATTERN °C U w SEE PYLON DETAIL' FLASHING & CEIFS CONT EIFS PREMIXED INTEGRAL COLOR CONTRACTOR 611 (COFFEE MILK) = SIGN CABINET ILLSSEE ri PYLON DETAIL' ID SIGNEET FARM O/2ESOUARETUBEFAAMEANp CIPANNELLETTERSAND LOGO ACCESS PANEL (WEST SIDE ONLY) � u BRACING COVERED WITH .063 ALUMINUM. 611 PRIMED & PAINTED BLACK FACES ARE PAINTED PD WITH GARP GUARO HANE TO MATCH RD - VALSPAR FLU A NORANGERANGE4346114. 19 GASB G�4 - R FUELIGHT LED PRICE DISPLAY D AMBER COCOA AMBCOLO � 36" CHARACTERS j 3'-3" H X 6'-11' W X 3" D CABINET DIMENSIONS 50 UNSHIELDED LED LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONS: 5000 NRS DURING DAYLIGHT HOURS 500 NRS AT NIGH CARWASHLREGM 36" REG O U-) 1On O 5' 841 1212 CAR WASH It 1� CO _1 L: N EIFS BY OTHERS EIFS W/ 8" X 16" STACKED BOND PATTERN AS SHOWN ACCESS PANEL L� -� L------------- 10 MAIN -- 10MAIN STORE MONUMENT SIGN EASTMEST ELEVATION EIFS W/ 8" X 16" STACKED BOND PATTERN AS SHOWN CMAIN STORE MONUMENT SIGN NORTH/SOUTH ELEVATION LL a 0 L------------ I CMAIN STORE MONUMENT SIGN NORTH/SOUTH ELEVATION LL a 0 3lV3S 01031NIHd ION SI )IHOMIHV SIH11X31 SIH133S NV3 f10A Al = d y0 o„ 0 Z L O U ¢w -. 9- z� oJLL zo ow `` E 1a E 04 oN d �3 LLD � ¢ of O Y r - _� wz r rcww O� 'rte OO ��— dd Oma¢ za YQ (7w mw QOM J J lr c.7 O CD UC7 H cc 3g <imLL _ LL cn U r W zN O J T v pz F QwO ZO �'– y U . 0 mo wF E a� R� ofmN� m�n� O ~ 3 ED ~¢¢ NZ �olU J J� -3 O d d CIE;U w ( a s w °C U w 3lV3S 01031NIHd ION SI )IHOMIHV SIH11X31 SIH133S NV3 f10A Al AMOK 1020 WILBURAVENUE PO.BOX 2098 WATERLOO, IA 50]04 319-2334804. FAX 319-233-7514 TOLL FREE: 800-7284604 60510WAAVENUE WEST MARSFIALLTOWN, IA 50158 641-752-608. FAX 641-752-6968 TOLL FREE: 888-56x446 ff-MINIM RM MILLS FLEET FARM MONTICELLO, MN TOM GROVO 11111WITarm, JDK 4-13-17A3 3/8"=1'0" 1111111M FIMMVIIIIIIII MILLS/MONTICELLO, MN/ POLE SIGN.FS 5-3-17 INTERNATIONAL .SIGN ASSOCIATION COPYRIGHT © 2017 THIS ARTWORK IS PROPERTY OF NAGLE SIGNS INC. AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED THIS RENDERING IS FOR REPRESENTATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY Color output may not be exact when viewing or printing this drawing. If these colors are incorrect, please provide the correct PMS match & the revision will be made. IF YOU CAN SEE THIS TEXT THIS ARTWORK IS NOT PRINTED TO SCALE PYLON DETAIL: GAS SIGNS SIGN LAYOUT IS THE SAME ON BOTH ELEVATIONS II A 21/2" RETAINER 0 _4 GAS DAKTRONICS FUELIGHT LED PRICE DISPLAY AMBER COLOR 36" CHARACTERS 34" H X 6-11" W X 3" D CABINET DIMENSIONS UNSHIELDED LED LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONS: 5000 NITS DURING DAYLIGHT HOURS 500 NITS AT NIGHT ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS: 4 AMPS/120 VOLTS PER FACE 8 AMPS/120 VOLTS TOTAL CAR WASH FACE: FLEX BKGD: 3M 3630-44 TRANSLUCENT ORANGE BLACK LETTERING BACKLIT WITH LED'S 3 AMPS PER FACE/120 VOLTS 6 AMPS/120 VOLTS TOTAL APPROVAI -4' FACE:LEXAN BKGD: 3M 3630-44 TRANSLUCENT ORANGE BLACK LETTERING BACKLIT WITH LED'S 1 AMP PER FACE/120 VOLTS 2 AMPS/120 VOLTS TOTAL IF YOU CAN SEE THIS TEXT THIS ARTWORK IS NOT PRINTED TO SCALE DATE A 4—: 11/2" DIVIDER 4 11/21' RETAINER 36" REG 1020 WILBURAVENUE PO.BOX 2098 WATERLOO, IA 50]04 319-2334804. FAX 319-233-7514 TOLL FREE: 800-7284604 60510WAAVENUE WEST MARSFIALLTOWN, IA 50158 641-752-608. FAX 641-752-6968 TOLL FREE: 888-56x446 MILLS FLEET FARM 1 1 MONTICELLO, MN TOM GROVO 11111WITarm, JDK 4-13-17A2 MILLS/MONTICELLO, MN/ POLE SIGN.FS 1 �rkli.Id.h:uli�:+cba INTERNATIONAL .SIGN ASSOCIATION COPYRIGHT © 2017 THIS ARTWORK IS PROPERTY OF NAGLE SIGNS INC. AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED THIS RENDERING IS FOR REPRESENTATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY Color output may not be exact when viewing or printing this drawing. If these colors are incorrect, please provide the correct PMS match & the revision will be made. IF YOU CAN SEE THIS TEXT THIS ARTWORK IS NOT PRINTED TO SCALE PYLON DETAIL: ID SIGN WHITE 20-8" ALL LETTERS AND LOGO ARE 4" OPEN CHANNEL LETTERS WITH EXPOSED LED TUBING M � � 07 . �' � � ALL LETTERS AND LOGO ARE PAINTED BLACK INSIDE AND OUTSIDE c Z v 11/2" SQUARE TUBE FRAME AND BRACING COVERED WITH .063 ALUMINUM. PRIMED & PAINTED BLACK. FACES ARE PAINTED WITH GRIP GUARD POLYURETHANE TO MATCH PYLON DETAIL REQUIREMENTS: 3 AMPS PER FACE VALSPAR FLUROPEN ORANGE 4348114. LED LIGHTING 6 AMPS TOTAL 1-120 VOLT CURCUIT EACH SIGN 20-8" r1� 0 m�� � � L ALLTUBING IS RED EXCEPT FOR LEFT HALF OF LOGO & CAP APPROVAI IF YOU CAN SEE THIS TEXT THIS ARTWORK IS NOT PRINTED TO SCALE DATE 1020 WILBURAVENUE PO.BOX 2098 WATERLOO, IA 50]04 319-2334804. FAX 319-233-7514 TOLL FREE: 800-7284604 60510WAAVENUE WEST MARSFIALLTOWN, IA 50158 641-752-608. FAX 641-752-6968 TOLL FREE: 888-56x446 MILLS FLEET FARM MONTICELLO, MN TOM GROVO IIIIIIFITT1174,7 JDK 4-13-17A4 50% 1111111M 1111MIrUVIIIIIIII MILLS/MONTICELLO, MN/ POLE SIGN.FS INTERNATIONAL .SIGN ASSOCIATION COPYRIGHT © 2017 THIS ARTWORK IS PROPERTY OF NAGLE SIGNS INC. AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED THIS RENDERING IS FOR REPRESENTATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY Color output may not be exact when viewing or printing this drawing. If these colors are incorrect, please provide the correct PMS match & the revision will be made. IF YOU CAN SEE THIS TEXT THIS ARTWORK IS NOT PRINTED TO SCALE PYLON DETAIL: FLASHING .040 AWMINUM PAINTED WITH GRIP GUARD POLYURETHANE TO MATCH VALSPAR FWROPEN ORANGE 4346114. I M APPROVAI 91/2" IF YOU CAN SEE THIS TEXT THIS ARTWORK IS NOT PRINTED TO SCALE DATE A B C I E C H Customer Name Nagle Sign 5' Reverse Channel Job Description LED C.L. Job # Mills Halo -lit LED Channel Letters Sign Height 5ft_FLEET FARM Sign Depth 7.5" Stroke Width Date 4/17/2017 Layout By: he Drawing # D170417_xl0_nagleS_mills_` FT_REVERSE 5CALE:NT5 5ft LETTE ' SSD: MOQ= 1 tray unit/power Ref # Part Number Description Qty I Unit I w/unit I supply 1 OTSP-M3PL-BW65 OpticsPro Plus Bright White 6500K 639 mods 0.9 60 2 JASU-60-12U 60W -12V Power Supply 16 pcs N/A N/A 3 4 5 *Power supply in each letter* 61' Linear 54ft-3irl 42' Lineal 46' Linear 1❑ M I L L S F L E E T LOGO F A R M total wattage 27 10 15 15 27 40 34 47 47 36 128 45 49 52 67 639 575.1 60' Linear NO 5CALE 11ft-bin LO 30 5ft LETTER 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 1 1 8 1 9 1 10 1 II 1 12 1 13 1 14 1 15 1 16 Bitro Group, Inc. — Note this Caution: This layout is an Estimate. "Recommendation #1: Test a typical letter using this layout before you move forward with the rest of the sign. Recommendation #2: Before shipping or installation at a jobsite; light your letters in a darkened area to assure yourself that you are satisfied that it works properly. Be aware that since construction standards and performance expectations can vary from client to client, Bitro Group, Inc. cannot be held responsible for your results. Recommendation #3: We strongly recommend that you check our layout before you proceed with your entire sign. Then, using the knowledge you have gained through your own testing and have learned what works successfully for you, proceed accordingly. Remember, every variable alters the outcome including but not limited to: letter depth, shape of the letter, placement of the modules, reflectivity and color of the interior of the letter, thickness, type of plex, and manufacture of the plex used (sometimes plex will even vary in translucence from sheet to sheet from the same manufacture.) Please take your time to do the testing at the beginning of each project to assure your success upon completion. Assumptions: The following information and standards are not concrete and may vary however; we have found that if you are using a Blue or Green face, this estimate is based on using 2447 White plex with vinyl overlay of a medium color shade. Using darker or lighter vinyl or using a different pigmented plex may cause results to vary. If using a Red face, this estimate is based on 2793 pigment plex. Be aware that 2283 and 2415 can be difficult to light evenly. Be sure to test a letter and follow what you have learned for the rest of your letters for this sign. Also, 7328 White is a common plex used, however, testing has found as much as a 20% variation from sheet to sheet with samples tested, thus be careful and look for this issue. Please be aware that White, Blue and Green are laid out on 4" centers, while Red, Orange and Amber are laid out using 5" centers. Notifications: This LED layout is the property of Bitro Group, Inc. and is not to be shared with third party entities without written approval from Bitro Group, Inc." bl"Ito Your LED Lighting Partner 300 Lodi St. Hackensack, NJ 07601 www.bitrogroup.com Tel (201) 641-1004 Fax (201) 641-0057 © 2017-2018 Bitro Group Inc. The artistic works depicted herein are copyright and are the exclusive property of Bitro Group Inc. and as such cannot be reproduced in whole or in part without prior written consent. For layouts & quotations: estimate@bitrogroup.com �NOV"� 1020 WILBURAVENUE PO.BOX 2098 WATERLOO, IA 50]04 319-2334804. FAX 319-233-7514 TOLL FREE: 800-7284604 60510WAAVENUE WEST MARSFIALLTOWN, IA 50158 641-752-608. FAX 641-752-6968 TOLL FREE: 888-56x446 MILLS FLEET FARM MONTICELLO TG JDK 5-4-176 3/16" =1'0" MILLS/MONTICELLO/ SERVICE CENTER.FS 5-4-17 INTERNATIONAL .SIGN ASSOCIATION COPYRIGHT © 2017 THIS ARTWORK IS PROPERTY OF NAGLE SIGNS INC. AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED THIS RENDERING IS FOR REPRESENTATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY Color output may not be exact when viewing or printing this drawing. If these colors are incorrect, please provide the correct PMS match & the revision will be made. IF YOU CAN SEE THIS TEXT THIS ARTWORK IS NOT PRINTED TO SCALE - - - - - - 16'- APPROVAI IF YOU CAN SEE THIS TEXT THIS ARTWORK IS NOT PRINTED TO SCALE 15" HELVETICA FORMED PLASTIC LETTERS 19MM MONOCHROME RED MESSAGE CENTER 29" X 10'-3" CABINET (24" X 10' VIEWING AREA) 32 X 160 MATRIX 4 LINES OF 32 CHARACTERS AT 5" TYPE UNSHIELDED LED LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONS: 5000 NITS DURING DAYLIGHT HOURS 500 NITS AT NIGHT ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS: 120 Volt 4.0 Amp Single Phase DATE 1020 WILBURAVENUE PO.BOX 2098 WATERLOO, IA 50]04 319-2334804. FAX 319-233-7514 TOLL FREE: 800-7284604 60510WAAVENUE WEST MARSFIALLTOWN, IA 50158 641-752-608. FAX 641-752-6968 TOLL FREE: 888-56x446 MILLS FLEET FARM ,. , MONTICELLO GV TG JDK 5-4-1782 1/2"=1'0" off gry, III, �wll MILLS/MONTICELLO/ SERVICE CENTER.FS INTERNATIONAL .SIGN ASSOCIATION COPYRIGHT © 2017 THIS ARTWORK IS PROPERTY OF NAGLE SIGNS INC. AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED THIS RENDERING IS FOR REPRESENTATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY Color output may not be exact when viewing or printing this drawing. If these colors are incorrect, please provide the correct PMS match & the revision will be made. IF YOU CAN SEE THIS TEXT THIS ARTWORK IS NOT PRINTED TO SCA' c 15" HELVETICA FORMED PLASTIC LETTERS STUD MOUNTED s I /A\i I I I�, 13'-11/2" a R 7'-1/2" 19MM MONOCHROME RED MESSAGE CENTER 29" X 10'-3" CABINET (24" X 10' VIEWING AREA) 32 X 160 MATRIX 4 LINES OF 32 CHARACTERS AT 5" TYPE UNSHIELDED LED LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONS: 5000 NITS DURING DAYLIGHT HOURS 500 NITS AT NIGHT ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS: 120 Volt 4.0 Amp Single Phase FLUSH MOUNTED WITH 3/8" X 21/4" RED HEAD WEDGE ANCHOR APPROVAI IF YOU CAN SEE THIS TEXT THIS ARTWORK IS NOT PRINTED TO SCALE DATE Customer Name I Nagle Sign Job Description IJob # —ISign Height ISign Depth A (Stroke Width IDate (Layout By: (Drawing # B C 1J C H LED C.L. Mills 14,KEROSENE 3", 2" stand off 4/17/2017 he Kerosene Halo -lit LED Channel letters & Logo D170417_x7_nagleS_mills_KE ROSENE 5CALE:NT5 WHITE WHITE ♦7 4" N ' s 27.3" > Ref # Part Number 1 OTSP-M3PL-BW65 2 ASU -60-12U Description OpticsPro Plus Bright White 6500K 60W -12V Power Supply Q PAINTED ANODIC BLACK -- 11/2" ANODIC BLACK BORDER WHITE FACES 4-10 9/1ED6" — I APPROX 8'-10" ► logo K E R 0 S E N E total wattage 15 5 5 6 6 6 5 7 5 60 54 SSD: MOQ= 1 tray unit/power Qty Unit w/unit supply 60 mods 0.9 60 1 PCs N/A N/A 1 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 1 1 8 1 9 1 10 1 II 1 12 1 13 1 14 1 15 1 16 Bim Group, Inc. — Note this Caution: This layout is an Estimate. "Recommendation #1: Test a typical letter using this layout before you move forward with the rest of the sign. Recommendation #2: Before shipping or installation at a jobsite; light your letters in a darkened area to assure yourself that you are satisfied that it works properly. Be aware that since construction standards and performance expectations can vary from client to client, Bitm Group, Inc. cannot be held responsible for your results. Recommendation #3: We strongly recommend that you check our layout before you proceed with your entire sign. Then, using the knowledge you have gained through your own testing and have learned what works successfully for you, proceed accordingly. Remember, every variable alters the outcome including but not limited to: letter depth, shape of the letter, placement of the modules, reflectivity and color of the interior of the letter, thickness, type of plex, and manufacture of the plex used (sometimes plex will even vary in translucence from sheet to sheet from the same manufacture.) Please take your time to do the testing at the beginning of each project to assure your success upon completion. Assumptions: The following information and standards are not concrete and may vary however; we have found that if you are using a Blue or Green face, this estimate is based on using 2447 White plex with vinyl overlay of a medium color shade. Using darker or lighter vinyl or using a different pigmented plex may cause results to vary. If using a Red face, this estimate is based on 2793 pigment plex. Be aware that 2283 and 2415 can be difficult to light evenly. Be sure to test a letter and follow what you have learned for the rest of your letters for this sign. Also, 7328 White is a common plex used, however, testing has found as much as a 20% variation from sheet to sheet with samples tested, thus be careful and look for this issue. Please be aware that White, Blue and Green are laid out on 4" centers, while Red, Orange and Amber are laid out using 5" centers. Notifications: This LED layout is the property of Bitro Group, Inc. and is not to be shared with third party entities without written approval from Bitm Group, Inc." bl'"Ite Your LED Lighting Partner 300 Lodi St. Hackensack, NJ 07601 www.bitrogroup.com Tel (201) 641-1004 © 2017-2018 Bitro Group Inc. The artistic works depicted herein are copyright and are the For layouts & quotations: Fax (201) 641-0057 exclusive property of Bitro Group Inc. and as such cannot be reproduced in whole or in part without prior written consent. estimate@bltrogroup.com 1020 WILBURAVENUE PO.BOX 2098 WATERLOO, IA 50]04 319-2334804. FAX 319-233-7514 TOLL FREE: 800-7284604 60510WAAVENUE WEST MARSHALLTOWN, IA 50158 641-752-608. FAX 641-752-6968 TOLL FREE: 888-56x446 ff-MINIM RM MILLS FLEET FARM MONTICELLO, MN TOM GROVO i JDK 4-12-17B 1/4"=1'0" MILLS/MONTICELLO, MN/ MONUMENT.FS INTERNATIONAL .SIGN ASSOCIATION COPYRIGHT © 2017 THIS ARTWORK IS PROPERTY OF NAGLE SIGNS INC. AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED THIS RENDERING IS FOR REPRESENTATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY Color output may not be exact when viewing or printing this drawing. If these colors are incorrect, please provide the correct PMS match & the revision will be made. IF YOU CAN SEE THIS TEXT THIS ARTWORK IS NOT PRINTED TO SCALE Electrical Requirements ID Sign: 3 amps 120 volt per side/ 1 -120 Volt circuit per side Gas Mart Sign: 2 amps 120 Volt per side/ 4 amps 120 Volt total Product Sign (Regular):lamp 120 Volt per side/ 2 amps 120 Volt total 1 -120 Volt circuit per side or more as needed for switching Gas Price LED sign: .75 amps 120 Volt per side / 1.5 amps 120 Volt total LED Message Center: 10 amps 120 Volt per side 1 - 20 amp circuit per side / constant power UNSHIELDED LED LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONS: 5000 NITS DURING DAYLIGHT HOURS 500 NITS AT NIGHT SIDE 1 4" deeI p channel letters with exposed LED tubing (SEE LED DETAIL) I 5'-2" SIGN TO FIT INTO 5'-3" SPACE 19'-2" 18" AMBER CHARACTER PRICE WATCHER SIGN OUTSIDE DIMENSIONS: 24" X 48" X 31/4" CUTOUT OPENING SIZE: 46" X 22" ti CV N r 25MM FULL COLOR 00 MESSAGE CENTER 41" X 8'-3" CABINET TX 8' V.A. 36 X 96 MATRIX 4 LINES OF 19 CHARACTERS AT A 7" TYPE I APPROVAI $, 8„ LEI) BACKLIT SIGN I 10' IF YOU CAN SEE THIS TEXT THIS ARTWORK IS NOT PRINTED TO SCALE FACE:AIFNIIIEDJEIABCySSED =ACE REVERE PAI 4T -:D0 MA "CH P;;WONT 165 i WITH LACK (. PY. LEFT TINE G _OG).\ND S LO cF% WHITE TH HLICW JTLINF. R GHT' IDE OI L7GC hI BL%W BACKL NIT1 I ED': 2 AMP, f'ER =rE 4 AMP -120' ILT Til AL DATE c' C? ED 1020 WILBURAVENUE PO.BOX 2098 WATERLOO, IA 50]04 319-2334804. FAX 319-233-7514 TOLL FREE: 800-7284604 60510WAAVENUE WEST MARSHALLTOWN, IA 50158 641-752-608. FAX 641-752-6968 TOLL FREE: 888-56x446 MILLS FLEET FARM MONTICELLO, MN TOM GROVO i JDK 4-12-1762 1/4"=1'0" MILLS/MONTICELLO, MN/ MONUMENT.FS 1 k�!✓ iil �1t�i i 1 X174 i1L'.� INTERNATIONAL .SIGN ASSOCIATION COPYRIGHT © 2017 THIS ARTWORK IS PROPERTY OF NAGLE SIGNS INC. AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED THIS RENDERING IS FOR REPRESENTATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY Color output may not be exact when viewing or printing this drawing. If these colors are incorrect, please provide the correct PMS match & the revision will be made. IF YOU CAN SEE THIS TEXT THIS ARTWORK IS NOT PRINTED TO SCALE Electrical Requirements ID Sign: 3 amps 120 volt per side / 1 -120 Volt circuit per side Gas Mart Sign: 2 amps 120 Volt per side/ 4 amps 120 Volt total Product Sign (Regular):lamp 120 Volt per side/ 2 amps 120 Volt total 1 -120 Volt circuit per side or more as needed for switching Gas Price LED sign: .75 amps 120 Volt per side / 1.5 amps 120 Volt total LED Message Center: 10 amps 120 Volt per side 1 - 20 amp circuit per side / constant power UNSHIELDED LED LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONS: 5000 NITS DURING DAYLIGHT HOURS 500 NITS AT NIGHT SIDE 2 5'-2" SIGN TO FIT INTO 5'-3" SPACE 19'-211 MILLS FLEE C? 50T FAI;E: PAVFOiMED EMBOSSED :ACE 3 :F:3E FA NTD r0 M%TCl- FENTYIE 1) 5C WITH B ACI C 6:0P—. )_EF SIDE 0LO3 m- AND SIL( A RE WHIT[, WITH B ACC I )UTI.IW. RIGHT SI �E �F LOG D S B -ACK 13A.,1LIT NITH LED's :'/-MP:; PER =)!ZE AMP= 20' `C—I T T D1 AL O1 I APPROVAI "M1 4" deep channel letters with exposed LED tubing (SEE LED DETAIL) 1M BMW=® AS Mill* A R N LO CAR WASH -8" 10' IF YOU CAN SEE THIS TEXT THIS ARTWORK IS NOT PRINTED TO SCALE DATE 18" AMBER CHARACTER PRI ;E WATCHER SIGN OU"SIDE DIMENSIONS: 24" X 48" X 31/4" CU "OUT OPENING SIZE: 46" X 22" LED BACKLIT SIGN CV M T 25MM FULL COLOR MESSAGE CENTER 41"X 8'-3" CABINET TX 8' V.A. 36 X 96 MATRIX 4 LINES OF 19 CHARACTERS AT A 7" TYPE IF YOU CAN SEE THIS TEXT THIS ARTWORK IS NOT PRINTED TO SCALE 1020 WILBURAVENUE PO.BOX 2098 WATERLOO, IA 50]04 31&2334804. FAX 318-233-7514 TOLL FREE: 800-7284604 60510WAAVENUE WEST 25MM MAR SFIALLTOWN, IA 50158 641 TOLL 88�656J4-6966 FULL COLOR MESSAGE CENTER TOLL FREE: 888F56-]446 41" X 8'-3" CABINET (3'X 8' V.A.) off-01WArkn, TUM 36 X 96 MATRIX MILLS FLEET FARM :•••• :� ::::::««��� . . ..................... ......... ........ 4LINES OF 19 CHARACTERS P �;�������� ���;����;;; MONTICELLO, MN AT A 7" TYPE «' , ......... ......................... .. .... ...................... ., TOMGROVO .............. ............................ .......... ...:::'.......; JDK ::«..«..«..«. .«..«..«.«..«..«..«..« ...................................................... .... ..................., ........................................ ... ....................... 4-12-1763 ..............................W-* ............ ............................... 3/4"=1'0" MILLS/MONTICELLO, MN/ MONUMENT.FS 19MM FULL COLOR MESSAGE CENTER 41" X 8'-3" CABINET (3X 8' V.A.) ..... ... .............. ............ .............. ..................... ........ ...................... . ............. ............... ......... ....... ....... .... 48 X 128 MATRIX ""'•""" ::'tiMt • . ...... . ........ ....... ........ . .... ............. ......................... ..... ............................. .......... ............. 6 LINES OF 26 CHARACTERS .------... ................. .. .... . ............... ............ AT 5" TYPE ....... ...... .............. .. .... .............. ....... .... ................. ............ INTERNATIONAL W.sicN ASSOCIATION a VV$,p .......................................................................... ....... ................. ..........................................------.......... ..... ...................... COPYRIGHT © 2017 .. -----: THIS ARTWORK IS PROPERTY OF NAGLE SIGNS INC. AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED THIS RENDERING IS FOR REPRESENTATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY Color output may not be exact when viewing or printing this drawing. If these colors are incorrect, please provide the correct PMS match APPROVAI DATE & the revision will be made. IF YOU CAN SEE THIS TEXT THIS ARTWORK IS NOT PRINTED TO SCALE Monticello Mills Fleet Farm Signage Calculation 6/1/2016 lProperty Building Wall Wall Dimensions Wall Area Sign Area^ Total Sign Ar -a %Coverage Remarks South Retail Building South Wall East Wall North Wall 476 FT. 26 FT. 12,376 S.F. 45 S.F. 17 S.F. 13 S.F. 17 S.F. 410 S.F. 33 S.F. 33 S.F. 17 S.F. 585 S.F. 5% West Wall 346 FT. 26 FT. 8,996 S.F. 216 S.F. 216 S.F. 2% Car Wash South Wall 72 FT. 14 FT. 1,008 S.F. 9 S.F. 9 S.F. 9 S.F. 3 S.F. 20 S.F. 50 S.F. 5% Facade includes one row of exposed LED strip lighting. East Wall 88 FT. 14 FT. 1,232 S.F. 11 S.F. 30 S.F. 7 S.F. 3 S.F. 20 S.F. 20 S.F. 71 S.F. 6% North Wall 72 FT. 14 FT. 1,008 S.F. 20 S.F. 5 S.F. 5 S.F. 5 S.F. 35 S.F. 3% West Wall 88 FT. 14 FT. 1,232 S.F. 20 S.F. 20 S.F. 2% Facade includes one row of exposed LED strip lighting. Monument Sign East Face 100 S.F. 31 S.F. 40 S.F. 171 S.F. N/A West Face 100 S.F. 31 S.F. 40 S.F. 171 S.F. N/A Gas Canopy South Elevation 121 FT. 3.5 FT. 424 S.F. 14 S.F. 14 S.F. 3% Face of canopy includes two rows of exposed LED strip lighting. East Elevation 52 FT. 3.5 FT. 182 S.F. 14 S.F. 14 S.F. 8% Face of canopy includes two rows of exposed LED strip lighting. North Elevation 121 FT. 3.5 FT. 424 S.F. 14 S.F. 14 S.F. 3% Face of canopy includes two rows of exposed LED strip lighting. West Elevation 52 FT. 3.5 FT. 182 S.F. 14 S.F. 14 S.F. 8% Face of canopy includes two rows of exposed LED strip lighting. North Pylon Sign East Face 93 S.F. 52 S.F. 27 S.F. 27 S.F. 199 S.F. N/A West Face 93 S.F. 52 S.F. 27 S.F. 27 S.F. 199 S.F. N/A J'\01158-MILLS\011580070-Monticello\0115B0070.000-New Store\Permits\City of Monticello\Land Use\2016-06-01 Signage Areas.xls City Council Agenda: 06/12/17 20. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-26 authorizing preparation of a Feasibility Report for improvements to 711 Street, Chelsea Road and Washington Street as related to the Fallon Avenue Overpass Proiect (SB) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Staff is requesting Council authorize preparation of a Feasibility Report addressing street, sidewalk and trail improvements for purposes of considering assessments to the benefitting property owners as part of the Fallon Avenue Overpass project. The topic of assessments for these improvements was discussed at the May 22, 2017 workshop. Assessments for street and sidewalk improvements along 7th Street and Washington Street and sidewalk and trail improvements along Chelsea Road and Fallon Avenue within the project limits of the Fallon Avenue Overpass project will be evaluated with the report. Estimated costs have been established with the Fallon Avenue overpass preliminary design that is underway and will be refined with the feasibility report. In general, the Feasibility Report will address the location, existing conditions, proposed improvements, estimated costs, preliminary assessment roll, financing, preliminary project schedule, and determination as to the necessity, feasibility and cost-effectiveness as related to the proposed improvements being considered for assessments. Once completed, the feasibility report will be presented to the Council to move forward with setting a public hearing for the improvements to coincide with other Council approvals needed for the Fallon Avenue Overpass project. Construction is planned to occur in 2018. The assessment hearing would take place in the fall of 2018 after the project is substantially completed. Al. Budget Impact: The improvements proposed to be assessed are included with the Fallon Avenue Overpass project scope and cost. The estimated costs for the entire project is $8,400,000. A more detailed cost estimate for the improvements proposed to be assessed will be provided in the feasibility report. The estimated cost to complete the feasibility report is $25,000. It is planned to issue abatement bonds in 2017 and 2018 to finance the Fallon Avenue Overpass project and related street improvements. Special assessments to the benefitting property owners will be a method to repay a portion of the debt. Assessments to the benefitting properties will include street, sidewalk and trail assessment components. The Council will need to make a decision on whether trail assessments will be considered. An evaluation of the assessments will be included with the feasibility report. A2. Staff Workload Impact: WSB staff will complete the Feasibility Report with utilizing City staff to the maximum extent possible. City Council Agenda: 06/12/17 B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2017-26 authorizing preparation of a Feasibility Report for improvements to 7th Street, Chelsea Road and Washington Street Improvements as related to the Fallon Avenue Overpass Project. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution 2017-26 at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends approving Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2017-26 B. Project Map 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-26 AUTHORIZING FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE FALLON AVENUE OVERPASS PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 16CO06 WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve the following streets and sidewalk and trail improvements as part of the Fallon Avenue Overpass Project, City Project 16CO06 and to assess the benefitting properties for all or a portion of the cost of the improvements, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. • Street and sidewalk improvements along 7th Street and Washington Street • Street, Sidewalk and trail improvements along Chelsea Road and Fallon Avenue NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELL0, MINNESOTA: That the feasibility study for proposed improvements be referred to WSB & Associates, and that the Engineer is instructed to report back to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible; whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 12th day of June, 2017. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator FALCON AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS THE BLUFFS U S F� APARTMENTS dmL Fj' I LANDSCAPED ISLAND WA THE BLUFFS APARTMENTS 1 a LINCOLN ESTATES 7 7 Won"," SHADE TREES � CONCRETE SIDEWALK DECORATIVE CONCRETE T � DURA THERM CROSSWALK WSI INDUSTRIES J % 4 r LANDSCAPED ISLAND BITUMINOUS TRAIL j 1 - -x WASHBURN • COMPUTER " GROUP 4, \ ►� Y � Monti"ce-- -o /,---LANDSCAPED ISLAND rWAYFINDING )I SIGNAGE AREA BITUMINOUS TRAiL 40 r ALL ELEMENTS HOGLUND BODY INC. k & EQUIPMENT ............ LEGEND TURF DECORATIVE PAVEMENT SHADE TREE CONCRETE SIDEWALK BITUMINOUS TRAIL RIGHT OF WAY A 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 otMinneapolis, MN 55416 WSB (763) 541-4800 1 wsbeng.com 09 50' 2005. Project # 02596-400 May 21, 2017 City Council Agenda: 06/12/17 2P. Consideration of authorizing final design services at an estimated cost of $420.000 for the Fallon Avenue Overpass Proiect. Citv Proiect No. 16CO06 (WSB/JO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: A presentation of the preliminary design for the Fallon Avenue Overpass project was reviewed at the May 22, 2017 City Council workshop. Staff is seeking authorization to continue with the project development process with final design services. The preliminary plan includes the I-94 bridge overpass along with three roundabouts at the intersections of Chelsea Road and Fallon Avenue, 7th Street and Fallon Avenue and Washington Street and 7th Street. Sidewalk and pathway facilities are included with the project scope. The scope of the final design services include the following: • Final design and plan and specification preparation for roadway, bridge, drainage, utilities, landscaping, bridge aesthetics, lighting and erosions control/SWPPP improvements • Preparation of roundabout justification reports which are required to be completed as part of the federal funding process. • Completion of a noise analysis based on federal environmental documents (i.e. project memo) requirements. This is required since Fallon Avenue is a new roadway alignment generating new noise levels. It is unlikely that noise walls will be included with the project or can be justified by being feasible or reasonable. • Utility coordination per MnDOT's process to determine which private utilities which will require relocation. • Provide project information and roundabout education materials on the City's project web page, as requested. • Final design document preparation for review by MnDOT Federal Aid and the MnDOT Bridge Office. • Preparation of separate landscape plan set which is recommended to be bid separately from the roadway design plans. It is recommended to specify a three year maintenance period for landscaping, which is outside the typical scope for a general road contractor, therefore a separate landscaping contract is better suited for the project. • Permitting will include any necessary permits required for the project such as; MnDOT, NPDES, MDH, etc. • Railroad coordination and permitting with BNSF to accommodate the sidewalk pedestrian crossing on Washington Street. • Preparation and coordination with City staff for the completion of federal delegated contract process (DCP) forms for federal authorization. • Preparation of special provisions and project manual documents to be used for bidding the project. • Project management and City staff and Council meetings City Council Agenda: 06/12/17 As previously authorized, the right of way process has begun with affected properties and it is the intent of staff to continue the process of federal plan authorization to be ready for project bidding in early 2018. This will allow for a contractor to begin the construction in the spring of 2018 with substantial project completion in the fall of 2018. A detailed project schedule is enclosed. According to Calvin Howison MNDOT project manager in charge of administration of Federal funds, bidding requirements for procuring engineering design services do not apply because Federal funds are not being used to pay for engineering services. Historically, the City has assigned all road reconstruction and road project design to the City Engineer. WSB has been involved in the development of the design and engaged in discussion with property affected property owners since 1998. As a professional service, the City has the latitude to select the engineer based on current practice. Al. Budget Impact: The estimated project cost including right of way acquisition costs and 22% for indirect costs, which includes engineering, legal, financing and administrative costs based on the preliminary plans is $8.4 million. The estimated construction cost is $6.0 million. The City has included this project in their Capital Improvement Program for design, construction and financing in 2017, 2018 and 2019. Funding for the project is to come from federal funding and a tax abatement levy. This project would also be eligible for State Aid funding which the City can advance fund dollars to fund a portion of this project. The funding plan will be evaluated and presented with the project design process. The federal funding amount of $2,100,000 can only be used for construction costs, therefore the remaining costs is planned to come from the tax abatement levy. Federal funding for transportation projects do not cover engineering, legal, financing and administrative costs. The estimated cost to complete the final design services based on the scope described above is $420,000, which is based on a task -based hourly fee. The preliminary design services total approximately 7% of the estimated construction cost of the project, which is typical percentage for roadway and bridge projects, however accounts for the complexity of the project and the federal process, which can be variable. A2. Staff Workload Impact: WSB and City staff will be involved throughout the various steps of the project development. 2 City Council Agenda: 06/12/17 2P. Consideration of authorizing final design services at an estimated cost of $420,000 for the Fallon Avenue Overpass Proiect, Citv Proiect No.16CO06 (WSB/JO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: A presentation of the preliminary design for the Fallon Avenue Overpass project was reviewed at the May 22, 2017 City Council workshop. Staff is seeking authorization to continue with the project development process with final design services. The preliminary plan includes the I-94 bridge overpass along with three roundabouts at the intersections of Chelsea Road and Fallon Avenue, 7th Street and Fallon Avenue and Washington Street and 7th Street. Sidewalk and pathway facilities are included with the project scope. The scope of the final design services include the following: • Final design and plan and specification preparation for roadway, bridge, drainage, utilities, landscaping, bridge aesthetics, lighting and erosions control/SWPPP improvements • Preparation of roundabout justification reports which are required to be completed as part of the federal funding process. • Completion of a noise analysis based on federal environmental documents (i.e. project memo) requirements. This is required since Fallon Avenue is a new roadway alignment generating new noise levels. It is unlikely that noise walls will be included with the project or can be justified by being feasible or reasonable. • Utility coordination per MnDOT's process to determine which private utilities which will require relocation. • Provide project information and roundabout education materials on the City's project web page, as requested. • Final design document preparation for review by MnDOT Federal Aid and the MnDOT Bridge Office. • Preparation of separate landscape plan set which is recommended to be bid separately from the roadway design plans. It is recommended to specify a three year maintenance period for landscaping, which is outside the typical scope for a general road contractor, therefore a separate landscaping contract is better suited for the project. • Permitting will include any necessary permits required for the project such as; MnDOT, NPDES, MDH, etc. • Railroad coordination and permitting with BNSF to accommodate the sidewalk pedestrian crossing on Washington Street. • Preparation and coordination with City staff for the completion of federal delegated contract process (DCP) forms for federal authorization. • Preparation of special provisions and project manual documents to be used for bidding the project. • Project management and City staff and Council meetings City Council Agenda: 06/12/17 As previously authorized, the right of way process has begun with affected properties and it is the intent of staff to continue the process of federal plan authorization to be ready for project bidding in early 2018. This will allow for a contractor to begin the construction in the spring of 2018 with substantial project completion in the fall of 2018. A detailed project schedule is enclosed. According to Calvin Howison MNDOT project manager in charge of administration of Federal funds, bidding requirements for procuring engineering design services do not apply because Federal funds are not being used to pay for engineering services. Historically, the City has assigned all road reconstruction and road project design to the City Engineer. WSB has been involved in the development of the design and engaged in discussion with property affected property owners since 1998. As a professional service, the City has the latitude to select the engineer based on current practice. Al. Budget Impact: The estimated project cost including right of way acquisition costs and 22% for indirect costs, which includes engineering, legal, financing and administrative costs based on the preliminary plans is $8.4 million. The estimated construction cost is $6.0 million. The City has included this project in their Capital Improvement Program for design, construction and financing in 2017, 2018 and 2019. Funding for the project is to come from federal funding and a tax abatement levy. This project would also be eligible for State Aid funding which the City can advance fund dollars to fund a portion of this project. The funding plan will be evaluated and presented with the project design process. The federal funding amount of $2,100,000 can only be used for construction costs, therefore the remaining costs is planned to come from the tax abatement levy. Federal funding for transportation projects do not cover engineering, legal, financing and administrative costs. The estimated cost to complete the final design services based on the scope described above is $420,000, which is based on a task -based hourly fee. The preliminary design services total approximately 7% of the estimated construction cost of the project, which is typical percentage for roadway and bridge projects, however accounts for the complexity of the project and the federal process, which can be variable. A2. Staff Workload Impact: WSB and City staff will be involved throughout the various steps of the project development. 2 City Council Agenda: 06/12/17 B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Consideration of authorizing WSB to provide final design services at an estimated cost of $420,000 for the Fallon Avenue Overpass Project, City Project No. 16CO06 2. Motion to go out for bids for final design services. 3. Motion to not move forward on the project at this time or to table for further review C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The City Administrator recommends alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Project Schedule FALLON AVENUE OVERPASS and ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF MONTICELLO, MN ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE Based on a typical Scope of Work and the Federal funding process guidelines, the following schedule would be anticipated: Phase 1— Preliminary Design/Project Development Notice to Proceed Phase 1........................................................................................ January 9, 2017 Submit Agency Review Letters (MnDNR, SHPO, Etc) .............................................. January 2017 Data Collection / Survey.............................................................................................. January 2017 Stakeholder/Property Owner Group Meeting #1 ....................................................... February 2017 City Council Workshop #1........................................................................................... March, 2017 Draft PM / Final Prel Design Plan to City....................................................................... April 2017 City Staff Review Meeting.............................................................................................. April 2017 Draft PM / Prel Design Plan (30%) to Mn/DOT.............................................................. May 2017 Mn/DOT and City Review.........................................................................................Up to 6 Weeks Stakeholder / Property Owner Group Meeting #2............................................................ June 2017 Address Mn/DOT and City comments......................................................................Up to 2 Weeks Final PM / Prel Design Plan to Mn/DOT........................................................................... July 2017 Final Mn/DOT Approval of PM...............................................................................Up to 5 Weeks PM / Preliminary Design Approved......................................................................... August 2017 Phase 1 — Right of Way Services Construction Limits Determined.................................................................................... March 2017 Right of Way Plan to City................................................................................................ April 2017 Parcel Descriptions and Exhibits...................................................................................... May 2017 Initial Parcel Work and Landowner Notification ....................................................May / June 2017 Right of Way Appraisals......................................................................................... June / July 2017 City Council Workshop #2.......................................................................................... August, 2017 Right of Way Acquisition (Offers).............................................................................. August 2017 Title and Possession.................................................................................................November 2017 R/W Certificate#1................................................................................................November 2017 Phase 2 — Final Design / Bidding Notice to Proceed Phase 2................................................................................................. June 2017 Draft (90%) Final Plan Submittal................................................................................October 2017 Mn/DOT and City Review.......................................................................................November 2017 Address Comments....................................................................................................Up to 2 weeks Final Plan Submittal................................................................................................. December 2017 FinalApproved Plans.............................................................................................. January 2018 Advertising for Bids.................................................................................................... January 2018 Preliminary and Final Plat Approval ......................................................................... February 2018 BidOpening............................................................................................................... February 2018 Phase 3 — Construction Notice to Proceed Phase 3 ...................... Public Open House ............................... Begin Construction ................................ Substantial Construction Completion .... Final Construction Completion .............. ...... March 2018 ...... March 2018 ........ April 2018 November 2018 ......... June 2019 FALLON AVENUE OVERPASS and ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF MONTICELLO, MN ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE Based on a typical Scope of Work and the Federal funding process guidelines, the following schedule would be anticipated: Phase 1— Preliminary Design/Project Development Notice to Proceed Phase 1........................................................................................ January 9, 2017 Submit Agency Review Letters (MnDNR, SHPO, Etc) .............................................. January 2017 Data Collection / Survey.............................................................................................. January 2017 Stakeholder/Property Owner Group Meeting #1 ....................................................... February 2017 City Council Workshop #1........................................................................................... March, 2017 Draft PM / Final Prel Design Plan to City....................................................................... April 2017 City Staff Review Meeting.............................................................................................. April 2017 Draft PM / Prel Design Plan (30%) to Mn/DOT.............................................................. May 2017 Mn/DOT and City Review.........................................................................................Up to 6 Weeks Stakeholder / Property Owner Group Meeting #2............................................................ June 2017 Address Mn/DOT and City comments......................................................................Up to 2 Weeks Final PM / Prel Design Plan to Mn/DOT........................................................................... July 2017 Final Mn/DOT Approval of PM...............................................................................Up to 5 Weeks PM / Preliminary Design Approved......................................................................... August 2017 Phase 1 — Right of Way Services Construction Limits Determined.................................................................................... March 2017 Right of Way Plan to City................................................................................................ April 2017 Parcel Descriptions and Exhibits...................................................................................... May 2017 Initial Parcel Work and Landowner Notification ....................................................May / June 2017 Right of Way Appraisals......................................................................................... June / July 2017 City Council Workshop #2.......................................................................................... August, 2017 Right of Way Acquisition (Offers).............................................................................. August 2017 Title and Possession.................................................................................................November 2017 R/W Certificate#1................................................................................................November 2017 Phase 2 — Final Design / Bidding Notice to Proceed Phase 2................................................................................................. June 2017 Draft (90%) Final Plan Submittal................................................................................October 2017 Mn/DOT and City Review.......................................................................................November 2017 Address Comments....................................................................................................Up to 2 weeks Final Plan Submittal................................................................................................. December 2017 FinalApproved Plans.............................................................................................. January 2018 Advertising for Bids.................................................................................................... January 2018 Preliminary and Final Plat Approval ......................................................................... February 2018 BidOpening............................................................................................................... February 2018 Phase 3 — Construction Notice to Proceed Phase 3 ...................... Public Open House ............................... Begin Construction ................................ Substantial Construction Completion .... Final Construction Completion .............. ...... March 2018 ...... March 2018 ........ April 2018 November 2018 ......... June 2019 City Council Agenda: 06/12/17 2Q. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-28 committing local matching funds for FAST ACT federal funding for the Fallon Avenue Overpass Proiect, Citv Proiect No. 16CO06 (WSB/JO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Fallon Avenue Overpass project was recommended for award of $2,100,000 in federal funds by the Region 7W TAC meeting on February 15, 2017. The region had $3,168,000 available to fund road and bridge projects as part of the fiscal year (FY) 2021 Local Surface Transportation Program (STP) Program. There were 9 projects that submitted application for funding with $18 million in requesting funding. Only 2 road and bridge projects were selected out of 9 submitted. The Fallon Ave overpass was recommended to receive $2.1 million and Sherburne County CSAH 1 was recommended to receive $1.068 million. The Transportation Policy Board approved the recommended funding on February 24 and the ATP (Area Transportation Partnership) Board recommended approval on April 6, 2017. The project will be included in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Fiscal year (FY) 2021. The City Council is requested to adopt Resolution #2017-28 acknowledging the $2,100,000 in federal funds and committing to the local match amount of $3,898,461 as identified in the federal funding application. These amounts reflect the estimated construction costs only, as the federal funds only cover construction costs. A certified resolution must be submitted to MnDOT by July 1, 2017 to allow the project to be added to the STIP. Al. Budget Impact: The estimated project cost including right of way acquisition costs and 22% for indirect costs, which includes engineering, legal, financing and administrative costs based on the preliminary design is approximately $8.4 million. The estimated construction cost is $6.0 million. The City has included this project in their Capital Improvement Program for construction and funding in 2018 and 2019. Funding for the project is to come from federal funding and a tax abatement levy. This project would also be eligible for State Aid funding which the City can advance fund dollars to fund a portion of this project. The funding plan will be evaluated and presented with the project design process. The federal funding amount of $2,100,000 can only be used for construction costs. Federal funding for transportation projects do not cover engineering, legal, financing and administrative costs. City Council Agenda: 06/12/17 A2. Staff Workload Impact: City staff and WSB will be involved throughout the various steps of the project development per the Delegated Contracting Process (DCP) agreement the City has in place with MnDOT, since MnDOT is the agent that administers the federal funds to the City. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2017-28 committing local matching funds for FAST ACT federal funding for the Fallon Avenue Overpass Project, City Project No. 16CO06 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution 2017-28 at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Resolution 2017-28 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2017-28 AGREEING TO COMMIT LOCAL MATCHING REVENUES FOR STP FEDERAL FUNDS APPROVED BY THE CENTRAL MINNESOTA AREA TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP (ATP) AND TO COVER ANY OTHER COSTS TO COMPLETE THE FALLON AVENUE OVERPASS PROJECT INCLUDED IN THE STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (STIP) WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation established eight Area Transportation Partnerships throughout the State to assist in the annual development of its State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), and WHEREAS, the STIP represents a multi-year list of transportation projects eligible for federal transportation funding provided for under the Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act, signed into law on December 4, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Central Minnesota Area Transportation Partnership (ATP) recommends projects seeking federal Surface Transportation Program Block Grant (STPBG) funding provided for under the FAST Act and eligible for inclusion in the STIP in the Counties of Benton, Cass, Crow Wing, Isanti, Kanabec, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Sherburne, Stearns, Todd, Wadena, and Wright; and WHEREAS, Region 7W Transportation Policy Board, representing the Counties of Benton, Sherburne, Stearns, and Wright, supports the ATP in the solicitation, evaluation, and recommendation of projects in Region 7W to include in the ATP's Draft Area Transportation Improvement Program (ATIP), which is a subset of the Minnesota STIP; and WHEREAS, the ATP grants regions the authority to determine the amount of STPBG funds to recommend for each project that is being considered for inclusion in the ATIP in order to maximize limited federal funds, leverage local resources, and help address each region's overall transportation needs; and WHEREAS, Region 7W Transportation Policy Board recommended the ATP program $2,100,000 in STPBG funds in year 2021 of the 2018-2021 ATIP for the Fallon Avenue Overpass project that will include a new Fallon Avenue roadway alignment, bridge over 1-94, 7th Street roadway reconstruction, pedestrian improvements and three new roundabouts submitted by the City of Monticello; and WHEREAS, each local agency must acknowledge the amount of federal funds recommended by the Region 7W Transportation Policy Board and commit the necessary local funding to match the STPBG funds requested, as well as any additional funding that may be necessaryto complete the project as proposed in its application; and WHEREAS, City of Monticello acknowledges the $2,100,000 in STPBG funds being recommended bythe ATP forthe Fallon Avenue Overpass project and understands that a minimum local financial match of $3,898,461 will be necessary based on the present construction cost estimate to fully implement the project; and THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, City of Monticello agrees to commit the necessary local revenues to match the STPBG funds approved by the ATP in its ATIP and included in the STIP and to cover any additional costs that may be necessary to complete the project as submitted. ADOPTED BY the City Council this 12' day of June, 2017. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator CERTIFICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WRIGHT I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution #2017-30 duly passed, adopted and approved by the Monticello City Council at their scheduled meeting on June 12, 2017, and recorded in minutes of said meeting. Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator Notary Public: Date: (STAMP) City Council Agenda — 06/12/2017 2R. Consideration of a request to approve amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Development Stage Planned Unit Development for entrance and building additions in a B-2 (Limited Business) District. Applicant: Lemke, Lenore — CentraCare Health Monticello (AS) Property: Legal: Lot 1, Block 1 Monticello Big Lake Community Hospital District Campus Address: 1013 Hart Boulevard PID: 155-208-001010 Planning Case Number: 2017-015 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development for construction expansion on existing hospital campus, including MRI unit, ambulance garage and entrance canopy. Deadline for Decision: June 30th, 2017 (60 days from complete application) Land Use Designation: Places for Community Zoning Designation: B-2, Limited Business The purpose of the B-2 (Limited Business District) is to provide for low intensity retail or service outlets which deal directly with the customer for whom the goods or services are furnished. The uses allowed in this district are to provide goods and services on a limited community market scale and located in areas which are well served by collector or arterial street facilities at the edge of residential districts Overlays/Environmental Mississippi Wild Scenic and Recreational River Regulations Applicable: District Current Site Use: Medical/Clinic Use, CentraCare Health - Monticello Surrounding Land Uses: North: River Street, Single -Family Residential, Mississippi River East: Multi -Family Residential, Mississippi Shores South: Institutional, Monticello Middle School West: Residential, Park City Council Agenda — 06/12/2017 Project Description: The applicant proposes to complete two phases of minor expansions at the hospital campus. The first phase would include the construction of a new canopy area to the exterior of the hospital with other internal improvements to the main hospital and emergency entrance. The second phase is proposed to include a new ambulance garage and MRI facility. All improvements are proposed to occur on the south (Broadway) side of the property. No changes are proposed to the existing lot boundary. ANALYSIS Ordinance Requirements: Within the B-2 District, Clinics and Medical Services are Permitted Uses, with no additional referenced conditions. As such, only the general provisions of the ordinance apply to the proposal. The CUP for PUD was applied primarily to accommodate the comprehensive sign plan, lot configuration and setbacks, and cross parking and access configurations throughout the site. The B-2 District requires no minimum lot area, with a minimum lot width of 100 feet. The B-2 District requires 30' front and rear yard setbacks, 20' corner lot setback and interior side yard setback of 10'. Parking lot setbacks must be at least 6 feet from property lines, and generally are not to be located within drainage and utility easements. Site Plan Analysis The proposed first phase includes the reconfiguration of the primary entrance drive area and construction of an exterior entrance canopy along the existing building front. The applicant will also be making internal building improvements to coordinate with the external changes. The proposed canopy is approximately 66' in length and will be constructed of a combination of architectural metal and masonry design. The improvements to the exterior will also include new landscaping and sidewalk at the front entrance area. The proposed second phase will include construction of two new facility expansion areas on the south side of the existing building. The first is a 1,765 sf ambulance garage and the second a 1,348 sf MRI facility. The garage will be located in an 2 City Council Agenda — 06/12/2017 existing vacant surfaced area east of the main hospital entrance. The MRI facility is proposed to be located between the main hospital and office building. That area is currently hard -surfaced and vacant. At the time of the construction of the second phase, the parking area and sidewalk directly in front of the two facilities will be reconstructed. Parking and Access. The applicant has provided a removals and site plan demonstrating traffic and ambulance flow for the proposed facilities. No change is proposed to the main entrance from Broadway into the site. The applicant will lose two stalls from the total number of parking stalls with the reconfiguration and will be required to maintain ADA compliance. The applicant's narrative suggests that the proposed improvements will serve to create better circulation for the site, improving response time for ambulance services and providing more easily understood customer entrance pick up and drop off points. The site plan also illustrates sidewalk and crossing improvements to the front entrance area from established parking lots. Landscaping. The applicant has provided landscaping plans that show landscaping areas in the parking lot islands, and within the new entrance area. The code requires landscaping quantities based on lot size and building perimeter. For the proposed improvements, the total requirement is 2 evergreen trees and 14 caliper inches of deciduous trees, with 33 shrubs, plus additional shrub requirements in the parking lot islands. The applicant's plans exceed these requirements, with the exception of the requirement for plantings within the parking lot islands. Staff recommends the relocation or addition of plantings into the parking lot islands to meet the landscaping requirements. Lighting. A photometric plan has been submitted with the proposal. The purpose of photometric review is to ensure that light glare does not impact neighboring residential property or public rights of way. The requirement for footcandles at property line is .5 footcandles for institutional uses. The proposed plan shows compliance with the City's requirements in this regard. Staff would note that the plans do not illustrate a pole height. Light standards are allowed at a maximum height of 25 feet. The applicant should verify that the light pole will meet this requirement and provide specification detail for building lights so that the requirement for cut-off fixtures may be verified. Signage. The applicant's narrative states that new signage will be added along the canopy and the face of the existing hospital. However, no sign plan has been provided. The applicant has not specified whether there would be any change to 3 City Council Agenda — 06/12/2017 existing free-standing signage. As a condition of approval, the applicant is asked to provide a conceptual sign plan prior to Council consideration of the final stage PUD. Building Design. The proposed improvements include a mix of brick and architectural metal. Specifically, the canopy will include pre -cast concrete, brick and aluminum metal materials. The proposed materials are consistent with the ordinance standards and as a condition of approval, will be required to consistent with existing building material colors. It appears that a portion of the east facing elevation plan does not detail materials treatment for the MRI facility. As a condition of approval, the applicant is required to verify building treatments for the visible portion of the MRI building facing east. The ambulance garage and MRI buildings will be faced with brick treatments and include insulated aluminum doors. While the MRI faces Broadway, the noted island delineator plantings, along with existing plantings with the boulevard, will provide some buffering to the streetscape view. Utilities, Grading and Drainage. The City Engineer is reviewing the project for these aspects, and has included a separate report which is incorporated here by reference. Trash Handling. The applicant has indicated that the trash handling is internal, with some storage outside near the loading dock on the north side of the building. As such, the current trash handling process is not impacted by the current proposal. PUD. As a procedural note, the Planning Commission reviews for recommendation the Development Stage PUD; Council will act on the final Stage PUD. As the applicant has applied for both development and final stage PUD at this time, both Development and Final Stage application materials will be presented to the City Council concurrently. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed this item on June 6th, 2017 and held a public hearing on the request. The applicant was present to address the Commission and provided an overview of the improvements, describing their relationship to improving patient care at the facility. No other members of the public were present to address the Commission on this item. The Commission unanimously recommended the amendment to CUP. L! City Council Agenda — 06/12/2017 It should be noted that the Final Stage PUD documents, including the noted sign plan and minor plan revisions per Exhibit Z, will be presented to Council for consideration at an upcoming meeting. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS The Planning Commission recommends Alternative # 1 below. 1. Motion to approve the amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Development Stage Planned Unit Development for CentraCare Health Monticello, contingent on compliance with the findings in Resolution #PC - 2017 -009 and those conditions specified in Exhibit Z. 2. Motion to deny amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Development Stage Planned Unit Development for CentraCare Health Monticello, based on findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion to table action on the request, pending additional information as identified by the Planning Commission and staff report. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development. The proposed uses are consistent with those associated with a Medical/Clinic and the establishment of the PUD for the hospital campus. Subject to compliance with the conditions in Exhibit Z, the plans meet the requirements of the code and reflect consistency with the goals for PUD. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution # PC -2017-009 B. Aerial Image, Subject Site C. Project Narrative D. Plan Set, including: a. Title Sheet b. Floor Plan c. Elevations d. Removal Plan e. Site Plan f. Utility Plan g. Grading Plan h. Erosion Control Plan i. Landscape Plan j. Details k. Photometrics 1. Revised Site Plan 5 in. Colored Elevations City Council Agenda — 06/12/2017 E. City Engineer's Letter, dated May 31, 2017 Z. Conditions of Approval EXHIBIT Z Amendment to Conditional Use Permit for PUD Lot 1, Block 1, Monticello Big Lake Hospital District Campus. 1. Verify materials for exposed wall on east side of the MRI facility. Materials shall be consistent and compatible with the other materials proposed. 2. Revise landscaping plan to meet requirements for island delineator plantings. 3. Applicant shall provide a conceptual wall and free-standing signage plan prior to final stage approval by the City Council. 4. Applicant shall provide a certificate of survey for building permit submittal. 5. Provide specification detail for lighting fixtures to demonstrate compliance with Chapter 4, Section 4 of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 6. Applicant shall enter into an amendment to development agreement as may be required for the proposed amendment. 7. Comments of other City Staff, including those within the City Engineer's letter dated May 31, 2017. C CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-009 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMEN TTO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR LOT 1, BLOCK 1, MONTICELLO BIG LAKE HOSPITAL DISTRICT CAMPUS WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request for amendment to an existing Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development for 1013 Hart Boulevard, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Monticello Big Lake Hospital District Campus; and WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to expand the medical and clinic uses and related accessory uses on the site; and WHEREAS, the site is guided for institutional uses under the label "Places for Community" in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment to CUP for PUD is consistent with the long- term use and development of the property for institutional uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 6th, 2017 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The PUD provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site. 2. The use of the site for an expansion of Medical/Clinic Uses and related accessory uses is consistent with the direction of the Comprehensive Plan for "Places for Community". 3. The plan for the hospital district campus expansion as proposed through PUD, results in a project that more closely achieves the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan than would the application of the standard zoning regulations. 4. The plan results in development that is compatible and consistent with the existing surrounding land uses in the area. 5. The improvements proposed for the site under the Development Stage and Final Stage PUD are consistent with the intent of the zoning ordinance. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-009 7. The PUD flexibility for the project, including site access and parking, building materials, display, and signage, are consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the PUD zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Development Stage PUD, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z as follows: 1. Verify materials for exposed wall on east side of the MRI facility. Materials shall be consistent and compatible with the other materials proposed. 2. Revise landscaping plan to meet requirements for island delineator plantings. 3. Applicant shall provide a conceptual wall and free-standing signage plan prior to final stage review by the City Council. 4. Applicant shall provide a certificate of survey for building permit submittal. 5. Provide specification detail for lighting fixtures to demonstrate compliance with Chapter 4, Section 4 of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 6. Applicant shall enter into an amendment to development agreement as may be required for the proposed amendment. 7. Comments of other City Staff, including those within the City Engineer's letter dated May 31, 2017. ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 2017, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. ATTEST: MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION LOW K Brad Fyle, Chair CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-009 Angela Schumann, Community Development Director CentraCare Health Monticello - Request for Conditional Use Permit for Dvlpmt. and Final Stage PUD Lt 1, Blk 1 Monticello Big Lake Community Hospital District Campus 1155-208-001010 11013 Hart Blvd 4 Y 1 map dry+.7 r �� FRRIfTpRlq� RD J --- // 1 W r 7 Z R5 ft Created by: City of Monticello r M- April 24, 2017 A R C H I T E C T S Angela Schuman Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, MN 55362 Re: CentraCare Health Monticello - PUD Narrative Dear Angela: As part of our ongoing commitment to provide excellent care to the people of this service area, CentraCare Health Monticello is planning additional improvements to our hospital. The Phase One project will include the redesign of the main hospital and emergency department entrance. The goals are to make room for additional vehicles as they drop-off and pick-up patients and visitors under a protected area from the weather with the new canopy layout. The new entrance vestibule will provide for wide automatic sliding doors for easier access. The new design will open the look of the main entry and make it easier to find when entering the hospital site. There will be new signage on the new canopy and along the face of the existing hospital, but the layout and design has yet to be determined. We are looking for the City of Monticello to provide some flexibility with the final design of all the signage. A signage package will be submitted at a later date. The intent of the new signage will be to provide clear wayfinding as a patient and/or visitor enters the site and the new front entrance for the hospital and emergency department. The public has been asked to change their pattern of entry to the existing building more than once so we will be clear with the new signage so people get to the right place the first time. Internally the organization will be redesigning the lobby to accommodate both inpatient and emergency registration areas and lobbies along with additional seating. The very popular gift shop will be refreshed with some additional space and a more open feel. This Phase One project will start in late July and be completed in Mid -November 2017. The Phase Two project will include creating a new ambulance garage that features a drive through design. This will save precious time rather than having the ambulances back -in to the garage which is their current practice. The timing of this phase has yet to be finalized but we expect it to follow as closely as possible behind the canopy and entrance phase, hopefully no later than spring of 2018. Internally the existing ambulance garage will be made a part of the remodeled emergency department so that rooms can be expanded, provide for designated behavioral health rooms, allow more privacy as it relates to the patient's experience, and expand an efficient work areas so flow can be maintained. This phase will begin after all exterior work is complete. The Phase Two project will also include the exterior work for an addition to the building. The new addition will house the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). This building addition will allow the hospital to provide the latest imaging technology. Our physicians will have better diagnostic tools to better serve the patients of this community. We look forward to continuing our collaborative relationship in making Monticello a great place to live and work. cc: File G:\12571\17049\05 Approvals\01 City\2017-04-24 CCH Monticello PUD NarrativeR.docx POPE ARCHITECTS, INC. 1295 BANDANA BOULEVARD N, SUITE 200 www.popearch.com ST. PAUL, MN 55108-2735 (651)642-9200 1 FAX (6511 642-1101 CENTRACARE HEALTH MONT SHEET INDEX SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME GENERAL A0.1 TITLE SHEET ARCHITECTURAL A2.0 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN A3.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND PERSPECTIVES CIVIL 1 OF 8 REMOVAL PLAN 2 OF 8 SITE PLAN 3 OF 8 UTILITY PLAN 4 OF 8 GRADING PLAN 5 OF 8 EROSION CONTROL PLAN 6 OF 8 LANDSCAPE PLAN 7 OF 8 DETAILS 8 OF 8 DETAILS ELECTRICAL E1 SITE PLAN PHOTOMETRICS LL C PUS PL • • • P.U.D. CITY SUBMI I I AL SET 1013 HART BLVD, MONTICELLO, MN 55362 [HV NORTH CELLO PROJECT DIRECTORY OWNER CENTRACARE HEALTH 1107 HART BLVD MONTICELLO, MN 55362 PHONE: (320) 251-2700 ext: 58470 CONTACT: LENORE LEMKE STRUCTURAL CLARK ENGINEERING CORPORATION 621 LILAC D R. N. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55422 PHONE: (763) 545-9196 CONTACT: CORY CASPERSON GENERAL CONTRACTOR MCGOUGH CONSTRUCTION 2737 FAIRVIEW AVE N ST. PAUL, MN 55113 PHONE: (651) 634-7747 CONTACT: BRAD SMITH ARCHITECT POPE ARCHITECTS 1295 BANDANA BLVD. N. / SUITE 200 ST. PAUL, MN 55108 PHONE: (651) 642-9200 CONTACT: DENTON MACK MECH./ ELEC. (OWNER CONSULTANT) DUNHAM 50 S. SIXTH ST. / SUITE 1100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 PHONE: (612) 465-7550 CONTACT: KURT THEN (MECH) WILL EVANS (ELEC) VICINITY MAP Iarsn ti a � 205111 Ave NW 9 } Slfjx�. ❑ ❑ .a c 3 rp ra co W I. + 2 ri {4 z 131g LRkf� I0 r Eli] Y r• 3 dip � r ---1 U13 HAIL I BLVU. MONTICELLO, MN NORTH POPE ARCHITECTS, INC. 1295 BANDANA BLVD N, SUITE 200 ST. PAUL, M N 55108-2735 (651) 642-9200 1 FAX (651) 642-1101 www.popearch.com CENTRACARE Health onticedo CENTRA CARE HEALTH REMODEL 1013 Hart Boulevard, Monticello, MN 55362 TITLE SHEET ssues and Revisions, Commission No: 12571-17049 Drawn bv, MB Checked DM SHEET TRUE SHEET SCALE C:\Revit Ph2)1&'WT6tft$1(3grAWareMonticello_PHASES_R16_CENTRAL_czechstone@yahoo.cori.r EXISTING NURSING HOME (NO WORK) ■ LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CORAID R 1?3 ISI ( 1 IMAGING I II WAITING tf ED WAITING 101C L I 101B ❑ ❑ O PHASE ONE "LOBBY" 1:1 � li C VOLUNTEER LOBBY DESK 101 101A �i D u � I IWI U ■ f LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION Ell I' • ���■ - Thi • • • W// • AL(:UVt 107E L 111 ❑ HSKP 104 o •Cn - � "`-' -_ rte' I EllI • � LANDSCAPE AREA 1101� 00 FIRST FLOOR A2.0 1/811 _ 1 1-011 GIFT SHC 102 PLAN - EMERGEN CY DEPARTMENT & LOBBY 1 1 1 IL 1� lb 11 IL LIF —L Ti y U LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTI ° \ ' tu 1 X 11, .� I \ ---- ----- ---- 1 I—----� J----� J --- I_ ■�—� JTJ 11 ily PHASE TWOF=� "E%IERI-EN(3)" D�P�RTMENT" I i P7 M F C1 t �IV���c F- CJ EXISTING CLINIC (NO WORK) POPE ARCHITECTS, INC. 1295 BANDANA BLVD N, SUITE 200 ST. PAUL, VIN 55108-2735 (651) 642-9200 1 FAX (651) 642-1101 www.popearch.com CENTRACARE Health onticei CENTRA CARE HEALTH REMODEL 1013 Hart Boulevard, Monticello, MN 55362 LOBB LOBBY MAIN LEVEL KEY PLAN OVERALL FROOR PLAN ssues and Reu;sons: CITY SUBMITTAL 4/24/2017 Commission No: 12571-17049 Drawn bv- MB Checked DM A2 SHEET 0 TRUE SHEET SCALE C:\Revit Wk2j�2Eb`f,�BD 39_2t?eAt�Care Mo nticel lo_P HAS ES_R 16_CENTRAL_czechstone@yahoo.con. i r FRONT PERSPECTIVE -VIEW 2 A3.0 f� MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" i V771 — ------ -------- --a — 3 AMBULANCE A3.0 1/811 = 1 '-0" PHASE ONE MP -1 COMPOSITE ALUMINUM PANELS (TYP.) r _ LIGHT FIXTURE (TYP) 18" DIA. ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST CONCRETE BOLLARD (TYP) 1 SOUTH ELEVATION (CANOPY) A3.0 1/811 = 1'-011 SEE 1 / B -A3.1 FOR TYPICAL NOTES I 1 8-2= rFB1 FB -2= EXTERIOR MATERIAL FINISH SCHEDULE MATERIAL ID MATERIAL MANUFACTURER FINISH COLOR NOTES PCAST - 1 ARCHITECTURAL MATCH EXIST MATCH EXIST PRECAST MP 1 COMPOSITE ALCOA / REYNOBOND CHAMPAGNE (MATCH EXIST) ALUMINUM PANEL MP -2 METAL PANEL PAC CLAD MATCH EXIST FLASH - 1 CAP FLASHING MATCH EXIST AFS -1 ALUMINUM WINDOW KAWNEER MATCH EXIST MATCH EXIST THERMALLY BROKEN FRAMES UTILITY BRICK (U.N.O.) FB -1 FACE BRICK BELDEN MATCH EXIST MARYSVILLE SEE ELEV'S FOR MODULAR LOCATIONS CONTACT GREG SFABURG & METROBRICK MODULAR FB -2 FACE BRICK BELDEN MATCH EXIST CONCORD CLEAR CONTACT GREG SEABURG @ METROBRICK 4 FRONT PERSPECTIVE -VIEW 1 A3.0 v ROWLOCK COURSE 112" RECESS [FB MAIN LEVEL MAIN LEVEL �_ I 100'-0" 100'-0" NEW INSUL. STEEL O.H. DOOR W/ WINDOW PANEL GARAGE WEST ELEVATION - PHASE TWO a r—� 77==r hJ I n ►. EXISTING EXIT DOOR BRICK COLUMN WRAP - ARCH PRECAST BASE AND ARCH PRECAST CAP ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST CONCRETE SILL. MATCH EXISTING PROFILE AND FINISH. 2 AMBULANCE A3.0 1/811 = 1 '-0" r';ISTING WINDOWS :ISTING BUILDING OVERFLOW SPOUT NEW ALUMINUM THERMALLY BROKEN WINDOWS WITH INSULATED SPANDREL GLASS Md CURVED EXISTING WALL 6" DIA. x 48" H PRECAST CONCRETE BOLLARD W/ CONC. PIER (TYP) INSULATED H.M. DOOR & FRAME INTERIOR AT MRI GARAGE EAST ELEVATION - PHASE TWO / PHASE TWO z NEW PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING (FLASH -1) EXISTING BUILDING ROWLOCK COURSE < < < RECESSED 1/2" ROWLOCK COURSE����� M:FB-9 RECESSED 112" (FB 1) < .; is -1 �. MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" NEW INSULATED HM DOOR POPE ARCHITECTS, INC. 1295 BANDANA BLVD N, SUITE 200 ST. PAUL, M N 55108-2735 (651) 642-9200 1 FAX (651) 642-1101 www.popearch.com ENTMCAR E Health Mon ti ce i o CENTRA CARE HEALTH REMODEL 1013 Hart Boulevard, Monticello, MN 55362 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND PERSPECTIVES ssues and Revisions: CITY SUBMITTAL 4/24/2017 Commission No: 12571-17049 Drawn b�: MB Checked DM SHEET TRUE SHEET SCALE 0" C:\Revit Projects\16015c CentraCareMonticello_ED-Imaging 6tZW&17F4WC9N1AFZAL czechstone@yahoo.com.rvt 0 2017 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or t- 11R11 D \ � Common Ground Alliance D D D D S9� D D D D D D° D D D Removal Legend EXISTING — — PROPOSED — — PROPERTY LINE EXISTING --------------- REMOVALS SAW CUT PAVEMENT CURB & GUTTER SAN� :::: L' ::: SANITARY SEWER WA ;;;; ;;;; WATER MAIN WA =- ; ; ; ; •+� ; ; ; • HYDRANT Sro ; ; ; ; �� �, ; ; ; • STORM SEWER GAS• ..... • • • • • • .... • • GAS PUG ; ; ; ; 14 N ; ; ; ; UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC POH :::. "04 :::: OVERHEAD ELECTRIC TUG ; ; ; ; %* ; ; ; UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE rOH ; ; ; ;'11 :::: OVERHEAD TELEPHONE FOP ; ; ; ;'14A :::: TELEPHONE FIBER OPTIC Ory ; ; ; ;'t 't ; ; ; ; CABLE TELEVISION .'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'. RETAINING WALL X FENCE a a a j CONCRETE BITUMINOUS BUILDING TREE LIGHT POLE —� TRAFFIC SIGN CONSTRUCTION BARRICADE Removal Notes 1. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE LIMITS OF REMOVALS WITH PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND FIELD VERIFY CONDITION OF EXISTING APPURTENANCES TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING OR REPLACING MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (SUCH AS FENCES, SIGNS, IRRIGATION HEADS, ETC.) THAT MAY BE DAMAGED BY CONSTRUCTION. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE ALL NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN SITE STABILITY PRIOR TO EXECUTING ANY SITE REMOVALS. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION WITH UTILITY PROVIDERS FOR REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AFFECTED BY SITE DEVELOPMENT. ALL PERMITS, APPLICATIONS AND FEES ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 1 0 WMMI 0 20' 40' 6 0' FOR PERMIT APPROVAL Westwood Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 3701 12th Street North, Suite 206 St. Cloud, MN 56303 Phone 320-253-9495 Fax 320-253-8737 Toll Free 1-800-270-9495 westwoodps.com Designed: Checked: Drawn: Record Drawing by/date: Revisions: 12/16/16 — DD 04/24/17 — City Submittal I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Brad C Wilkening Date 04/24/17 Prepared for: tkem No. 26908 CentraCare 1013 Hart Boulevard Monticello, MN 55362 2017 Monticello Hospital Addition Monticello, MN Removal Plan Date: 04/24/17 Sheet: 1 OF 8 0008615.00RMF01.dwg 0 2017 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 nr CQIIR11 t -nm Common Groi 2222 Site Legend EXISTING PROPOSM no I _ MF PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE SETBACK LINE EASEMENT LINE CURB AND GUTTER TIP—OUT CURB AND GUTTER POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL RETAINING WALL FENCE CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK HEATED CONCRETE SIDEWALK HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NORMAL DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS TRANSFORMER SITE LIGHTING TRAFFIC SIGN POWER POLE BOLLARD / POST General Site Notes 1. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, THE ENGINEER SHOULD BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY. 2. REFER TO BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR LOT BEARINGS, DIMENSIONS AND AREAS. 3. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF EXITS, RAMPS, AND TRUCK DOCKS. 5. ALL CURB RADII ARE SHALL BE 3.0 FEET (TO FACE OF CURB) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE 8612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGGERS AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS. 8. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 10. SITE LIGHTING SHOWN ON PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN PREPARED BY OTHERS FOR SITE LIGHTING DETAILS AND PHOTOMETRICS. 0 Site Details (SI-OXX) 1 B612 CURB & GUTTER 2 MOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER 3 D418 CURB & GUTTER 4 BITUMINOUS CURB 5 INTEGRAL CURB AND WALK 6 CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER 7 ENTRANCE THRU CURB AND GUTTER 8 PRIVATE CONCRETE SIDEWALK 9 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP 10 PARALLEL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP 11 CROSS WALK STRIPING 12 TEMPORARY BITUMINOUS CUL—DE—SAC 13 TRAFFIC ARROW 14 SIGN INSTALLATION 15 HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE AND STRIPING 16 PRECAST CONCRETE WHEEL STOP 17 TYPE 3 BARRICADE 18 BOLLARD 19 PAVEMENT SECTIONS 20 BITUMINOUS TRAIL 24 CONCRETE CURB AT SIDEWALK 25 CURB CUT WITH EROSION CONTROL MAT 28 MOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER CONSTRUCTION AT CATCH BASIN 32 BEAVERTAIL CURB (6612) 0 20' 40' 6 0' FOR PERMIT APPROVAL Westwood Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 3701 12th Street North, Suite 206 St. Cloud, MN 56303 Phone 320-253-9495 Fax 320-253-8737 Toll Free 1-800-270-9495 westwoodps.com Designed: Checked: Drawn: Record Drawing by/date: Revisions: 12/16/16 — DD 04/24/17 — City Submittal I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Brad C Wilkening Date 04/24/17 Prepared for: tkem No. 26908 CentraCare 1013 Hart Boulevard Monticello, MN 55362 2017 Monticello Hospital Addition Monticello, MN Site Plan Date: 04/24/17 Sheet: 2 OF 8 0008615.00SPF01.dwg 0 2017 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call8ll com Common Ground All! 7A \D D \ D D D D ° D° Sy v� \ D D D D \ D D D D / D / / SAN MH--�D RIM= 935.14 INV= 920.84 (N) D D INV=921.09 (W) INV= 920.94 (E) ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX s Utility Legend EXISTING PROPOaM -SAN- FM AN FM STO WA r WA r-(S� GAS PUG POH TUG rOH FOP cTV FM GAS PUC' POH ruG TOH FOP cry ►►► H ►:. D p D / D p 4 - NV=925.67 T ❑ / T q / d ° Il a ✓ � \r. "\ d a \ D SyN a° \\ D ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX D ��, a)PY , -4 SIGN - a s9ti a • D CORE DRI D CONNECT TO EXISTING SANI MANHOLE. ADJUST TOP OF D CAq, `ELEVATION. CONTRACTOR TO / VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATKK D ° ST S ° TO D ■ PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE CURB AND GUTTER SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN STORM SEWER WATER MAIN HYDRANT GAS UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE OVERHEAD TELEPHONE TELEPHONE FIBER OPTIC CABLE TELEVISION DRAIN TILE GATE VALVE FLARED END SECTION (WITH RIPRAP) LIGHT POLE VERTICAL UTILITY SEPARATION CONNECT TO DOWNSPOUT IE=927.18 I 40'- 6" VC .,00%� X. MH -1- =934.92 ' = 22.00 (E) 41'4127 STM SWR @ 1.30%- 61'-10" PVC @ 2.00% /-INV= 926.84 INV=922.28 i / 1 926.52 STMH-101 48" 0 RE=935.36 IE=925.96 (NW) IE=925.96 (E) IE=926.24 (SW) 32'-10" PVC @ 2.00% �- 8x8IN DRAIN ICETO DOWNSPOUT IE=926.59 --FFE : 935.91 STUB IE=922.79 PROP A ITION ►► FFE- 1 ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX ENCHMARK T NUT EL=937.35 2 SAN RIM= 934. INV=921. EX. B 00 I MO. ( 6" 00 BE I CORE DRILL AND CON CT `C_ B EXISTING STORM MANHOLE RIM=93 . 9 \ N V= 925. WATERMAIN CROSSING SEE DETAIL WM05 HYD. W/AUX. VA`�V GRND ELEV.=934. 33 LF - 6" DIP General Utility Notes 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES. 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATER MAIN MATERIAL AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE PER CITY REQUIREMENTS, MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. 3. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE NECESSARY FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS FOR THE PROPOSED WORK OR VERIFY WITH THE OWNER OR ENGINEER THAT PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. PERMIT FEES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE ARRANGED WITH THE OWNER. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF DOORWAYS, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY CONNECTION LOCATIONS. 5. ALL PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE SERVICE LINE CONSTRUCTION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY CITY PERMITS FOR UTILITY CONNECTIONS, AND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY. THE CITY SHALL BE NOTIFIED 48 -HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH THE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION OR ANY REQUIRED TESTING. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE, INTERFERE WITH, CONNECT ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO, OR TAP ANY WATER MAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. AN OUT =92728 PROPOSED MRI ROOM FFE=935.91 V ' • . . ' . ° .. t MAI ► STMH-201 D° r\ E- 35.72 2 . 2 (SW) �9T UPGRADE EXISTING ,STo STORM PIPE TO 10" PVC E ADJOST EXISTING MANHOLE TING p / RE=933.99 IE=925.67 / / DD \ `- S H RIM 933.20 INV ( _ .67 6') INV (NW/S -925.2 (1 ) 7. WATER MAIN LENGTHS AS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE HORIZONTAL LENGTHS. ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL PIPE WHEN INSTALLING ON SLOPES OR WHEN DEFLECTIONS ARE REQUIRED. THE JOINT DEFLECTIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM RECOMMENDED BY THE PIPE MANUFACTURER OR BY LOCAL GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS. FITTINGS REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT WATER MAIN SHALL BE INCLUDED IN WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION. 8. PROVIDE WATER MAIN THRUST RESTRAINTS PER CITY STANDARD REQUIREMENTS. 9. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATER LINE CROSSINGS WITH SANITARY SEWER OR STORM SEWER. THE WATER LINE SHALL NOT HAVE JOINTS OR CONNECTION WITHIN 10 -FEET OF THE CROSSING. INSULATE CROSSINGS WITH STORM SEWER. 10. UTILITY SERVICES TYPICALLY TERMINATE 5 OUTSIDE BUILDING WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN OR NOTED. 11. DUCTILE IRON WATER LINES SHALL BE CLASS 52, PER AWWA C115 OR C151. COPPER WATER LINES SHALL BE TYPE K PER ASTM B88. PVC WATER LINES SHALL BE PER AWWA C900 AND INSTALLED PER AWWA C605 IF ALLOWED BY CITY. 12. ALL WATER LINES SHALL HAVE 8' MINIMUM COVER. INSULATE WATER MAIN IF LESS THAN 8' OF COVER. INSULATION SHALL BE DOW STYROFOAM HI BRAND 35 OR EQUIVALENT, WITH 4 INCHES OF THICKNESS. 13. SANITARY SEWER PIPE OUTSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D2665. ALL PLASTIC SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE INSTALLED PER D2321. SOLVENT WELD JOINTS MUST INCLUDE USE OF A PRIMER WHICH IS OF A CONTRASTING COLOR TO THE PIPE AND CEMENT. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE TESTED ACCORDING TO MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PART 712.0. 14. STORM SEWER PIPE: A. RCP AND HDPE PIPE MAY BE INSTALLED WITH APPROVAL OF LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY. 0' 20' 40' 60' FOR PERMIT APPROVAL ,--FFE :936.29 / D D D \ D \D D D \ D \'-CANOPY D D B. REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 5 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 18" AND SMALLER, CLASS 3 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 21" AND LARGER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, PER ASTM C76 WITH R-4 GASKETS. C. HDPE STORM PIPE 4- TO 10 -INCHES IN DIAMETER SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTO M252. HDPE STORM PIPE 12- TO 60 -INCHES IN DIAMETER SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2306. FITTINGS SHALL BE PER ASTM D3212 AND INSTALLED PER ASTM D2321. D. PVC STORM SEWER PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PIPE PER ASTM D2665 AND INSTALLED PER ASTM D2321. E. CORRUGATED METAL PIPE (CMP) FOR SIZES 18- TO 120 -INCH AND MUST MEET ASTM A760 OR ASTM A796 AND BE INSTALLED PER ASTM A798. CMP MAY NOT BE INSTALLED WITHIN 10 -FEET OF A WATERMAIN, WATER SERVICE, OR A BUILDING. F. ALL STORM SEWER JOINTS AND STRUCTURE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT AS REQUIRED BY MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PART 707.3. STORM SEWER LOCATED WITHIN 10 -FEET OF A BUILDING AND/OR WATER LINE SHALL BE TESTED PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PART 712. 15. ALL NONCONDUCTIVE PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A LOCATE (TRACER) WIRE PER MINNESOTA RULES, PART 7560.0150. 16. POST INDICATOR VALVES SHALL BE CLOW F-5750 (OR EQUIVALENT) MEETING AWWA STANDARD C509 AND CITY STANDARDS. VALVE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINT RESILIENT WEDGE GATE VALVE. POST TO BE ADJUSTABLE FOR 8 FEET WATER MAIN DEPTH. THE ELECTRICAL ALARM SWITCH SHALL BE PART NO. PCVS2 (OR EQUIVALENT). 17. AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN AS -BUILT RECORD OF UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. THE AS -BUILT SHALL INCLUDE LOCATION AND LENGTH DEVIATIONS OR CHANGES TO THE PLAN. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY WITH OWNER OR ENGINEER WHETHER A PLAN WITH POST -CONSTRUCTION ELEVATIONS IS REQUIRED. Westwood Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 3701 12th Street North, Suite 206 St. Cloud, MN 56303 Phone 320-253-9495 Fax 320-253-8737 Toll Free 1-800-270-9495 westwoodps.com Designed: Checked: Drawn: Record Drawing by/date: Revisions: 12/16/16 - DD 04/24/17 - City Submittal I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Brad C Wilkening Date 04/24/17 Ucam No, Prepared for: CentraCare 1013 Hart Boulevard Monticello, MN 55362 26908 2017 Monticello Hospital Addition Monticello, MN Utility Plan Date: 04/24/17 Sheet: 3 OF 8 0008615.00UTF01.dwg 0 2017 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or cc"—" Common Groi Grading Legend Grading Notes EXISTING 980 _ 982 PROPOSM X980_ X982- — Sro ® ►► E WAT SAN . . . . r 91.00 x� e SB -19 9X 1-00 1.50% 0 Cb 0' R E.O.F. 85.00 � SB -19 PROPERTY LINE INDEX CONTOUR INTERVAL CONTOUR CURB AND GUTTER POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL STORM SEWER FLARED END SECTION (WITH RIPRAP) WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER RETAINING WALL DRAIN TILE RIDGE LINE GRADING LIMITS SPOT ELEVATION FLOW DIRECTION TOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALL EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SOIL BORING LOCATION 1. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND. 2. CONTRACTORS SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULE, SLOPED PAVEMENT, EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS, EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS, AND EXACT LOCATIONS AND NUMBER OF DOWNSPOUTS. 3. ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL/SURFACE RESTORATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. 4. ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE FOUR INCHES OF TOPSOIL AND SOD OR SEED. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PLANTING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING 9. SEE SOILS REPORT FOR PAVEMENT THICKNESSES AND HOLD DOWNS. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ANY EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL THAT EXISTS AFTER THE SITE GRADING AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL IN A MANNER ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER AND THE REGULATING AGENCIES. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL RETAINING WALL DESIGN CERTIFIED BY A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. 12. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL RULES INCLUDING THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 13. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY STRUCTURE OR PAVEMENT, A PROOF ROLL, AT MINIMUM, WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE SUBGRADE. PROOF ROLLING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MAKING MINIMUM OF 2 COMPLETE PASSES WITH FULLY—LOADED TANDEM—AXLE DUMP TRUCK, OR APPROVED EQUAL, IN EACH OF 2 PERPENDICULAR DIRECTIONS WHILE UNDER SUPERVISION AND DIRECTION OF THE INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY. AREAS OF FAILURE SHALL BE EXCAVATED AND RE—COMPACTED AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL 14. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL PLACED BENEATH BUILDINGS AND STREET OR PARKING SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFIED DENSITY NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MNDOT 2105.3F1 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS. 6. ALL SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED TO 3:1 OR FLATTER, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THIS SHEET. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING AND PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITH UNIFORM SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. 8. SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE FINISHED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS & GUTTER FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACE GRADE. 15. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL NOT PLACED IN THE BUILDING PAD, STREETS OR PARKING AREA, SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDINARY COMPACTION METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MNDOT 2105.3F2. 16. ALL SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 1 06666MMI 0 20' 40' 6 0' FOR PERMIT APPROVAL Westwood Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 3701 12th Street North, Suite 206 St. Cloud, MN 56303 Phone 320-253-9495 Fax 320-253-8737 Toll Free 1-800-270-9495 westwoodps.com Designed: Checked: Drawn: Record Drawing by/date: Revisions: 12/16/16 — DD 04/24/17 — City Submittal I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Brad C Wilkening Date 04/24/17 Prepared for. tkem No. 26908 CentraCare 1013 Hart Boulevard Monticello, MN 55362 2017 Monticello Hospital Addition Monticello, MN Grading Plan Date: 04/24/17 Sheet: 4 OF 8 0008615.00GDF01.dwg 0 2017 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or cc"—" Common Groi Erosion Control Legend General Erosion Control Notes 980 _ 982 Sro ffi ®WA SAN X980_ X982- — N 1 I 1 I I 1 I No M1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Im Ill Ill Ill x'9016 0' R E.O.F. 85.00 SB -19 O PROPERTY LINE INDEX CONTOUR INTERVAL CONTOUR CURB AND GUTTER POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL SILT FENCE STORM SEWER FLARED END SECTION (WITH RIPRAP) WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER RETAINING WALL DRAIN TILE RIDGE LINE GRADING LIMITS ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT TOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALL EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SOIL BORING LOCATION INLET PROTECTION 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES. 2. ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN—PLACE PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL VIABLE TURF OR GROUND COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILT FENCE ON—SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND OR REMOVED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OF EXTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELD CONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TO EROSION CONTROL. TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAYBALES, ETC., REQUIRED BY THE CITY SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. 3. EROSION AND SILTATION CONTROL (ESC): THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTROLLING ALL SILTATION AND EROSION OF THE PROJECT AREA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY TO CONTROL THE EROSION AND SILTATION INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: CATCH BASIN INSERTS, CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, AND SILT FENCE. ESC SHALL COMMENCE WITH GRADING AND CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK BY THE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY INCLUDES ALL IMPLEMENTATION AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT EROSION AND THE DEPOSITING OF SILT. THE OWNER MAY DIRECT THE CONTRACTOR'S METHODS AS DEEMED FIT TO PROTECT PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS. ANY DEPOSITION OF SILT OR MUD ON NEW OR EXISTING PAVEMENT OR IN EXISTING STORM SEWERS OR SWALES SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT. AFFECTED AREAS SHALL BE CLEANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER THE TURF IS ESTABLISHED. 4. ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY. A CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO DETAILS TO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS. 5. PROPOSED PONDS SHALL BE EXCAVATED FIRST AND USED AS TEMPORARY PONDING DURING CONSTRUCTION 6. WHEN INSTALLING END—OF—LINE FLARED END SECTIONS, BRING THE SILT FENCE UP & OVER THE FLARED END SECTIONS & COVER DISTURBED AREAS WITH RIP RAP. THE UPSTREAM FLARED END SECTIONS SHALL HAVE WOOD FIBER BLANKET INSTALLED ON THE DISTURBED SOILS. 7. ALL UNPAVED AREAS ALTERED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST BE RESTORED WITH SEED AND MULCH, SOD, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET OR BE HARD SURFACE WITHIN 2 WEEKS OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. 8. THE SITE MUST BE STABILIZED WITH A 25-151 SEED MIX AT 70—POUNDS PER ACRE AND TYPE I MULCH AT 2—TONS PER ACRE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2575 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9. TEMPORARY SEEDING SHALL BE MN/DOT SEED MIX 22-111 AT 40—POUNDS PER ACRE AND TYPE I MULCH AT 2—TONS PER ACRE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2575 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 10. FOR AREAS WITH SLOPE OF 3:1 OR GREATER, RESTORATION WITH SOD OR EROSION CONTROL BLANKET IS REQUIRED. 11. ALL TEMPORARY STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE INSTALLED AROUND THEM TO TRAP SEDIMENT. 12. ALL PERMANENT PONDS USED AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DREDGED AFTER THE SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED TO RESTORE THE POND TO THE PROPOSED BOTTOM ELEVATION. 13. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL AND STATE RULES INCLUDING THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 14. THE SITE MUST BE KEPT IN A WELL—DRAINED CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TEMPORARY DITCHES, PIPING OR OTHER MEANS REQUIRED TO INSURE PROPER DRAINAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. LOW POINTS IN ROADWAYS OR BUILDING PADS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH A POSITIVE OUTFLOW. 15. PUBLIC STREETS USED FOR HAULING SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF SOIL AND DEBRIS. STREET SWEEPING SHALL BE CONCURRENT WITH SITE WORK. 1 0 �-M� 0 20' 40' 6 0' FOR PERMIT APPROVAL Westwood Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 3701 12th Street North, Suite 206 St. Cloud, MN 56303 Phone 320-253-9495 Fax 320-253-8737 Toll Free 1-800-270-9495 westwoodps.com Designed: Checked: Drawn: Record Drawing by/date: Revisions: 12/16/16 — DD 04/24/17 — City Submittal IC a BCW I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Brad C Wilkening Date 04/24/17 Prepared for: tkem No. 26908 CentraCare 1013 Hart Boulevard Monticello, MN 55362 2017 Monticello Hospital Addition Monticello, MN Erosion Control Plan Date: 04/24/17 Sheet: 5 OF 8 0008615.00ECF01.dwg o 2017 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or ca11811. com Common Ground Alliance D Nz D p � D D W ` ° D W � D °D \ W W W W W SOD AREA � �• W W S9ti (TYP.) �W W IN, 3 -MLC - 8x8IN DRAIN =ASD EDGER (TYP.) 4-KFG }( �10-ASD J 4-KFG - 18 - Westwoodl DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING Plant Schedule 5 -RSG -�z, 6 -ABH �qT 2 -MLC SOD 7�REA (TYP.) PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES. PROVIDE ONE CENTRAL LEADER. GUYING AND STAKING, AS REQUIRED, FOR ONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES: TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.) OR TO FIRST BRANCH. BOTTOM OF STAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW GROUND. STAKING POSTS TO BE 2"X2" STAINED WOOD OR PAINTED STEEL DELINEATOR POSTS. PLACE 3 POSTS REMOVE CONTAINER, SET SOIL MASS EQUIDISTANT AROUND AND ON COMPACTED SOIL MOUND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL. SECURE MATCHING SHRUBS NATURAL TREE TO POSTS WITH 16" LONG e4 GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED GRADE. POLYPROPYLENE OR �� y�° ❑C ALL PLANTING BEDS SHALL RECEIVE POLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL., 1.5" a -°I 4" OF SPECIFIED MULCH AND WEED WIDE STRAP. d BARRIER FABRIC. TREE WRAP MATERIAL FROM e o EDGE ALL PLANTING BEDS WITH GROUNDLINE UPWARD TO FIRST o SPECIFIED EDGER WHERE ADJACENT BRANCHES, AS REQUIRED. TO LAWN AREAS. PLACE MULCH, DEPTH AS SPECIFIED, OVER PLANT PITS - DO NOT PILE 11I, AGAINST TRUNK. I=' SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF 1_1= _=' E ELI �-' FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN. �__ �- HOLE. BACKFLL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL. BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. BACKFILL SOIL. REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE. ROOT FLARE TO BE PLANTED AT OR NEAR FINISHED GROUNDLINE. SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING TREES NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED SITE GRADE. N.T.S. I Viestwoo T.SYlestwoodSHRUB PLANTING N.T.S. 3 -FLS 6 -RSH I ,-- 11-DWE YYestwoodI PERENNIAL PLANTING REMOVE CONTAINER, SET SOIL MASS N COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING PERENNIALS NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED SITE GRADE. ALL PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS SHALL RECEIVE 2" COMPOST MULCH. EDGE ALL PLANTING BEDS WITH SPECIFIED EDGER WHERE ADJACENT TO LAWN AREAS. CULTIVATE TO 10" MINIMUM. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH 1/4 PART COMPOST TO 1 PART EXISTING TOPSOIL, WELL MIXED. N.T.S. YYastwood LA26 PROPOSED MRI ROOM FFE=935.91 5 -RSG SIDEWALK AGGREGATE SUBBASE EXISTING SOIL MAINTAIN TOP OF MULCH SLIGHTLY LOWER THAN EXISTING EDGE. FINISH GRADE PLANTING BED SOIL MIX TO BE FOR LAWN MINIMUM OF 4" BELOW EXISTING SOIL SIDEWALK EDGE TO ALLOW FOR ADEQUATE LIP FOR MULCH- - MAINTAIN �i POSITIVE ®- T� DRAINAGE AWAY N FROM BUILDING BUILDING EXTERIOR x WALL N SPECIFIED MULCH SPECIFIED TOPSOIL SIDEWALK & PLANTER EDGE Planting Notes 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. 2. ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. 3. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 4. ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 6. ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA -GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING. CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3. 7. PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. 8. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. 9. PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL -IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. 10. PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 11. OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS. 12. PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. 13. WRAP ALL SMOOTH -BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST. 14. STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. 15. THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. 16. BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS. 17. MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB AND PERENNIAL AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH OR PER PLAN. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS. PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH OR PER PLAN. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND COLORED RED, OR APPROVED EQUAL TO MATCH EXISTING. ROCK MULCH TO BE WASHED RIVER ROCK, 1 1/2" TO 3" DIAMETER, AT MINIMUM 3" DEPTH, OR APPROVED EQUAL TO MATCH EXISTING. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH NO EXPOSURE. PARKING LOT ISLANDS TO BE MULCHED WITH ROCK MULCH. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS. 18. EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE VALLEY -VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGING OR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. POLY EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND STAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH BASE OF TOP BEAD AT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V -SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE AND SHRUB BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 19. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 20. PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE OR CONNECT INTO EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS -BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL HAVE A RAIN SENSOR PROVIDED, IF NOT ALREADY INCLUDED IN EXISTING SYSTEM. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. \ 21. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. 22. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS Westwood Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 3701 12th Street North, Suite 206 St. Cloud, MN 56303 Phone 320-253-9495 Fax 320-253-8737 Toll Free 1-800-270-9495 westwoodps.com Designed: CIF Checked: CEF Drawn: CEF Record Drawing by/date: Revisions: 12/16/16 - DD 04/24/17 - City Submittal I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Chad B, Feigum, PLA >)aft 04/24/17 License Na Prepared for. CentraCare 1013 Hart Boulevard Monticello, MN 55362 46508 ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2017 Monticello 23. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. ANCHOR FLANGE VINYL EDGING STAKE. DRIVE THROUGH ANC,, ,. FLANGE (MAXIMUM SPACING 6' D.C.). VINYL BED EDGINGTOP TO CIFIED TOPSOIL SPECIFIED MULCH ... ... CODE QTY. COMMON/BOTANICAL NAME SIZE SPACING O.C. PLANTING BED GSL 3 GREENSPIRE LINDEN / TILIA CORDATA 'GREENSPIRE' 2.5" BB AS SHOWN BELOW EDGING MLC 5 MARILEE CRABAPPLE / MALUS 'JARMIN' 1.5" BB AS SHOWN MJJ 18 MINT JULEP JUNIPER / JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS 'MONLEP' 24" SPRD., POT 4'-0" O.C. DRAIN SCJ 19 SCANDIA JUNIPER / JUNIPERUS SABINA 'SCANDIA' 24" SPRD., POT 4'-0" O.C. 1,-8x8/N EXISTING ORNAMENTAL GLS 14 GRO-LOW SUMAC / RHUS AROMATICA 'GRO-LOW' 18" HT., POT 6'-0" O.C. TREES TO REMAIN. ABH 6 ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA / HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS 'ANNABELLE' 24" HT., POT 4'-0" O.C. SHALL BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION. DWE 11 DWARF WINGED EUONYMUS / EUONYMUS ALATUS 'COMPACTUS' 24" HT., POT 3'-0" O.C. (TYP.) FLS 27 FIRE LIGHT SPIREA / SPIRAEA 'FIRE LIGHT' 18" HT., POT 2'-0" O.C. 13-SDO ASD 126 APRICOT SPARKLES DAYLILY / HEMEROCALLIS 'APRICOT SPARKLES' NO. 1 CONT. 12" O.C. 10-MJJ RVD 60 RED VOLUNTEER DAYLILY / HEMEROCALLIS 'RED VOLUNTEER' NO. 1 CONT. 18" O.C. SDO 28 STELLA DE ORO DAYLILY / HEMEROCALLIS 'STELLA DE ORO' NO. 1 CONT. 12" O.C. RSH 9 ROYAL STANDARD HOSTA / HOSTA 'ROYAL STANDARD' NO. 1 CONT. 16" O.C. 3 -RSH BLB 16 BLAZE LITTLE BLUESTEM GRASS / SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM 'BLAZE' QUART POT 18" O.C. 13-RVD KFG 14 KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS / CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA 'KARL FOERSTER' QUART POT 24" O.C. ,t RSG 15 RED SWITCH GRASS / PANICUM VIRGATUM 'SHENANDOAH' QUART POT 24" O.C. NOTE: QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY. 5 -RSG -�z, 6 -ABH �qT 2 -MLC SOD 7�REA (TYP.) PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES. PROVIDE ONE CENTRAL LEADER. GUYING AND STAKING, AS REQUIRED, FOR ONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES: TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.) OR TO FIRST BRANCH. BOTTOM OF STAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW GROUND. STAKING POSTS TO BE 2"X2" STAINED WOOD OR PAINTED STEEL DELINEATOR POSTS. PLACE 3 POSTS REMOVE CONTAINER, SET SOIL MASS EQUIDISTANT AROUND AND ON COMPACTED SOIL MOUND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL. SECURE MATCHING SHRUBS NATURAL TREE TO POSTS WITH 16" LONG e4 GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED GRADE. POLYPROPYLENE OR �� y�° ❑C ALL PLANTING BEDS SHALL RECEIVE POLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL., 1.5" a -°I 4" OF SPECIFIED MULCH AND WEED WIDE STRAP. d BARRIER FABRIC. TREE WRAP MATERIAL FROM e o EDGE ALL PLANTING BEDS WITH GROUNDLINE UPWARD TO FIRST o SPECIFIED EDGER WHERE ADJACENT BRANCHES, AS REQUIRED. TO LAWN AREAS. PLACE MULCH, DEPTH AS SPECIFIED, OVER PLANT PITS - DO NOT PILE 11I, AGAINST TRUNK. I=' SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF 1_1= _=' E ELI �-' FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN. �__ �- HOLE. BACKFLL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL. BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. BACKFILL SOIL. REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE. ROOT FLARE TO BE PLANTED AT OR NEAR FINISHED GROUNDLINE. SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING TREES NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED SITE GRADE. N.T.S. I Viestwoo T.SYlestwoodSHRUB PLANTING N.T.S. 3 -FLS 6 -RSH I ,-- 11-DWE YYestwoodI PERENNIAL PLANTING REMOVE CONTAINER, SET SOIL MASS N COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING PERENNIALS NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED SITE GRADE. ALL PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS SHALL RECEIVE 2" COMPOST MULCH. EDGE ALL PLANTING BEDS WITH SPECIFIED EDGER WHERE ADJACENT TO LAWN AREAS. CULTIVATE TO 10" MINIMUM. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH 1/4 PART COMPOST TO 1 PART EXISTING TOPSOIL, WELL MIXED. N.T.S. YYastwood LA26 PROPOSED MRI ROOM FFE=935.91 5 -RSG SIDEWALK AGGREGATE SUBBASE EXISTING SOIL MAINTAIN TOP OF MULCH SLIGHTLY LOWER THAN EXISTING EDGE. FINISH GRADE PLANTING BED SOIL MIX TO BE FOR LAWN MINIMUM OF 4" BELOW EXISTING SOIL SIDEWALK EDGE TO ALLOW FOR ADEQUATE LIP FOR MULCH- - MAINTAIN �i POSITIVE ®- T� DRAINAGE AWAY N FROM BUILDING BUILDING EXTERIOR x WALL N SPECIFIED MULCH SPECIFIED TOPSOIL SIDEWALK & PLANTER EDGE Planting Notes 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. 2. ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. 3. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 4. ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 6. ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA -GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING. CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3. 7. PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. 8. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. 9. PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL -IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. 10. PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 11. OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS. 12. PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. 13. WRAP ALL SMOOTH -BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST. 14. STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. 15. THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. 16. BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS. 17. MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB AND PERENNIAL AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH OR PER PLAN. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS. PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH OR PER PLAN. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND COLORED RED, OR APPROVED EQUAL TO MATCH EXISTING. ROCK MULCH TO BE WASHED RIVER ROCK, 1 1/2" TO 3" DIAMETER, AT MINIMUM 3" DEPTH, OR APPROVED EQUAL TO MATCH EXISTING. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH NO EXPOSURE. PARKING LOT ISLANDS TO BE MULCHED WITH ROCK MULCH. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS. 18. EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE VALLEY -VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGING OR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. POLY EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND STAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH BASE OF TOP BEAD AT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V -SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE AND SHRUB BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 19. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 20. PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE OR CONNECT INTO EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS -BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL HAVE A RAIN SENSOR PROVIDED, IF NOT ALREADY INCLUDED IN EXISTING SYSTEM. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. \ 21. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. 22. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS Westwood Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 3701 12th Street North, Suite 206 St. Cloud, MN 56303 Phone 320-253-9495 Fax 320-253-8737 Toll Free 1-800-270-9495 westwoodps.com Designed: CIF Checked: CEF Drawn: CEF Record Drawing by/date: Revisions: 12/16/16 - DD 04/24/17 - City Submittal I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Chad B, Feigum, PLA >)aft 04/24/17 License Na Prepared for. CentraCare 1013 Hart Boulevard Monticello, MN 55362 46508 ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2017 Monticello 23. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. ANCHOR FLANGE VINYL EDGING STAKE. DRIVE THROUGH ANC,, ,. FLANGE (MAXIMUM SPACING 6' D.C.). VINYL BED EDGINGTOP TO CIFIED TOPSOIL SPECIFIED MULCH ... ... �\� - Via. �l \\� - PLANTING BED SOIL MIX TO BE -�� MINIMUM OF 4" BELOW EDGING FOR MULALLOW FOR ADEQUATE LIP CH. N.T.S. Westvlrocd l LA11 ll0`11111111201012W Hospital Addition Monticello, MN 0' 20' 40' 60' N.T.S. FOR PERMIT APPROVAL LA10 Landscape Plan Date: 04/24/17 Sheet: 6 OF 8 0008615.00PLF01.dwg 0 2017 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. WOVEN MONOFILIMENT (36" WIDE) 5' STEEL T -POST FLOW LOW PONDING HEIGHT i/`�\ \����%�✓ 6'-0" FILTER FABRIC, ATTACH MAX. SECURELY TO UPSTREAM SPACING SIDE OF POST WITH 5' STEEL 3-501b TENSILE STRENGTH T -POST PLASTIC ZIP -TIES PER POST WITHIN TOP 8" OF FABRIC. RUNOFF TRENCH WITH NATIVE BACKFILL 1"-2" WASHED ROCK OR WOODCHIPS PER 12" MIN. SPECIFICATIONS 7, FABRIC SLICED INTO SOIL WITH COMPACTED 18" MINIMUM CUT OFF TO NOTE: BACKFILL MINIMIZE RUNOFF FROM SITE 1. INSPECT AND REPAIR FENCE AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN NOTES: ACCUMULATED TO 1/3 THE HEIGHT OF THE FABRIC OR MORE. 1. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED UNDER ROCK/WOOD CHIPS TO STOP MUD MIGRATION THROUGH ROCK/WOOD CHIPS. 2. REMOVED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DEPOSITED TO AN AREA THAT WILL NOT CONTRIBUTE 2. WOODCHIPS USED FOR CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES MUST BE 80% NOT LESS THAN SEDIMENT OFF-SITE AND CAN BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. 2 -INCHES AND NOT MORE THAN 5 -INCHES. NO CHIPPED -UP MANUFACTURED WOOD AND/OR CHEMICALLY TREATED IS ALLOWED. 3. SILT FENCE SHALL BE PLACED ON SLOPE CONTOURS TO MAXIMIZE PONDING EFFICIENCY. 3. ENTRANCES MUST BE MAINTAINED REGULARLY TO PREVENT SEDIMENTATION ON PUBLIC ROADWAYS. FUGITIVE ROCK OR WOODCHIPS WILL BE REMOVED FROM ADJACENT 4. ALL ENDS OF THE SILT FENCE SHALL BE WRAPPED UPSLOPE SO THE ELEVATION OF THE ROADWAYS DAILY OR MORE FREQUENTLY AS NECESSARY. BOTTOM OF FABRIC IS HIGHER THAN "PONDING HEIGHT". 4. LENGTH AND WIDTH TO BE ADJUSTED FOR SITE CONDITIONS. 5. "HEAVY DUTY" IS SAME AS MACHINE SLICED ONLY HAND INSTALLED. MACHINE SLICED SILT FENCE LAST 03/03/08REVISED: LAOS/���12D: ��O°d (HEAVY DUTY) GD03 � CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE GD05 TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION -EBS SUPER GLUE ADHESIVE COMPACTED OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT 12„ . . . . + . . . + . . . . . . BACKFILL (1/4" BEAD, 360DEGREES) �O 5„ WEAR COURSE +* * BC** GRANULAR BORROW * * * (MNDOT SPEC. 6 * + + 3149.2131) BASE COURSE MIN.=BC+12 "BC" DENOTES OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF PIPE K1�\PIPE FOUNDATION & BEDDING IN GOOD SOILS CASTING BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE RING ADJUSTMENT DETAIL BASE COURSE x0.25" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE CASTING ADJUSTMENT DETAIL RING NOTE 1. THE HEIGHT OF THE DUCTILE IRON ADJUSTMENT RING IS DETERMINED BY THE THICKNESS OF THE OVERLAY. 2. DUCTILE IRON ADJUSTMENT RING AS MANUFACTURED BY ESS BROTHERS AND SONS INC. OR ENGINEER APPROVED EQUAL. LAST REVISED: VVestwood MANHOLE CASTING 11/23/09 ADJUSTMENT RING SS07 2-1 /2' 2-1 /2' CAPS w/ CHAINS HYDRANT O AS SPECIFIED 0 16" MIN. 20" MAX. li -III- I -III -I 1 �I 1 1 ��-iTi-I � -11-Li � I-7 i -i i i- 1 I - - VALVE BOX AS - SPECIFIED O 2 LAYERS OF 00 2 - 3/4" POLYETHYLENE TIE RODS 2 - 3/4"- 1 CU. YD. OF TIE RODS ° 1/2" ROCK °IIIA GATE VALVE PRECAST CONC.BASE AS SPECIFIED NOTE: 1. MEGA -LUGS MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF TIE RODS LAST REVISED: VYestVV 0001 FIRE HYDRANT 04/27/12 WM 01 COMPACTED BACKFILL *++++++4 + ++ + ++ + + ++ ++ ++ ++ + + + + + + + + + ++++++++++++++++ 1I2 +++++++++++ ++++++ +BEDDING " + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 6„ FOUNDATION / / �A IAS CURSE FILTER "BC" DENOTES OUTSIDE MINIMUM AGG. (MNDOT SPEC. DIAMETER OF PIPE 2D+BC+12 3149.2H) PIPE FOUNDATION & BEDDING IN POOR SOILS PIPE BEDDING DETAILS FOR PVC & HDPE LAST REVISED: 11/23/09 SS10 GATE BOX BASE TO REST ON CONCRETE BLOCKS MIN. 4" ABOVE PIPE OR VALVE SET RIM 1/4"-1/2" BELOW FINISHED SURFACE COMPACTED BACKFILL BASE SUPPORT DETAIL 0 00 MECHANICAL JOINTr4" MIN. FITTING W/ RETAINER '1 GLANDS (TYP.) 3 L 3 3 F STANDARD VALVE BOX TYLER SERIES 6860, ITEM G OR EQUAL NOTE: 1. GATE VALVE CLOCKWISE OPENING ON SPWU SYSTEM OPENING. 2. COUNTERCLOCKWISE OPENING ON NORTH ST. PAUL SYSTEM VALVES CONFORMING TO AWWA C-509. 3. 12" WATER MAINS AND LARGER REQUIRE BUTTERFLY VALVES LAST REVISED: VYestwlood GATE VALVE 04/27/12 WM02 't VARIES s a ffla IROCK _ ACCESS d CONCRETE WASHOUT SIGN OL ,L -L -U �,� FENCE NOTE: CONCRETE WASHOUT AREAS WILL HAVE AN IMPERMEABLE LINER TO PREVENT CONCRETE WASHOUT WATER FROM INFILTRATING/CONTACTING WITH SOIL. IMPERMEABLE LINER INCLUDES 10 MIL POLY LINER OR COMPACTED CLAY LINER. WASHOUT SYSTEMS CAN BE USED AS ALTERNATE WASHOUT AREAS. 1.5' MIN SECTION A -A SILT FENCE IMPERMEABLE LINER LAST REVISED: d CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA 08/26/08 GD08 COMPA BACKFII LOAD FACTOR 1.5 LOAD FACTOR 1.5 ' All i-' ll 11 COMPACTE 7 BACKFILL 3C/4 BU T NOT A W� NORMAL 0.5 BC MIN. BEDDING W COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE MNDOT SPEC. 3149.2H CLASS C-1 CLASS C-2 HAND SHAPED FROM FIRM HAND SHAPED FROM ANGULAR UNDISTURBED SOIL BEDDING MATERIAL "BC" DENOTES OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF PIPE BARREL "W" BC+12" MINIMUM LOAD FACTOR 1.9 LOAD FACTOR 2.3 112" / COMPACTED BACKFILL 1 BACKFILL 0.5 BC 7r 0.5 BC IIIII�IIIIW 2000# I BC/46UT NOT CONCRETE W LESS THAN 6" COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE MNDOT SPEC. 3149.2H CLASS B CLASS A HAND SHAPED FROM ANGULAR CONCRETE BACKFILL TO 0.5 BEDDING MATERIAL OF OUTSIDE DIAMETER WITH SHAPED BEDDING. PIPE BEDDING DETAILS FOR RCP & DIP LAST REVISED: 11/23/09 SS11 PROPOSED W.M. - EXISTING SANITARY SEWER INSULATION AS REQUIRED DOUBLE NUT RODS AT ALL FLANGES TIE BACK ONE (TYP.) (1) PIPE LENGTH ON EACH END I ........ 1/2" TIE ROD J (TYP.) -18" MIN. INSTALL 450 BENDS NOTES: 1. TIE ALL JOINTS WITH MEGALUGS (8 REQUIRED) LAST REVISED: WATERMAIN CROSSING 08/13/15 WM05 CASTING CASTING c 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 - 00000 00000 00000 �� 00000 00000 00000 CASTING ®®®®®®® NO SCALE NOTES: 1. INFRASAFE 2'x3' DEBRIS COLLECTION DEVICE OR ENGINEER APPROVED EQUAL. 2. PLACE 400 -MICRON BAG IN EACH BASKET PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 3. PLACE GRATE OVER COLLECTION DEVICE. 4. CLEAN AND MAINTAIN BASKETS WHEN SEDIMENT IS MAXIMUM 3 -INCHES FROM TOP OF BASKETS. 5. CLEANING AND MAINTENANCE SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL. LAST REVISED: MANUFACTURED 2'x3' 11/23/09 INLET PROTECTION GD31 GASKET 2 - S.S. _ d TAKE-UP CLAMPS EXISTING MANHOLE SNAP -IN POWER SLEEVE JZ 0 CORE DRILL HOLE GROUT INVERT �. e �2" MIN. d d d cd d d a a CLEAN SURFACE "PSX" SNAP -IN -SLEEVE OR ACCEPTED EQUAL LAST REVISED: PIPE TO EXISTING MANHOLE 4/19/10 CONNECTION SS12 F -j j F - RISE AMOUNT 1" 1.25" 2" I II 2.25" 1u� 2.5" 3" 3.5" 1.875" 4" EBS SUPER GLUE ADHESIVE OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT (1/4" BEAD, 360DEGREES) ADJUSTMENT RING BASE COURSE WEAR COURSE 0.5" r 10.5" ---- < BASE COURSE GATE VALVE BOX GATE VALVE BOX,/ NOTE 1. THE HEIGHT OF THE DUCTILE IRON ADJUSTMENT RING IS DETERMINED BY THE THICKNESS OF THE OVERLAY. 2. DUCTILE IRON ADJUSTMENT RING AS MANUFACTURED BY ESS BROTHERS AND SONS INC. OR ENGINEER APPROVED EQUAL. LAST REVISED: Vllestvr11ood GATE VALVE BOX 11/23/09 ADJUSTMENT RING WM12 Westwood Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 3701 12th Street North, Suite 206 St. Cloud, MN 56303 Phone 320-253-9495 Fax 320-253-8737 Toll Free 1-800-270-9495 westwoodps.com Designed: NM Checked: BCW Drawn: b1® Record Drawing by/date: Revision& 12/16/16 - DO 04/24/17 - City Submittal I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of Minnesota Brad C Wilkening Date: 04/24/17 Ucam No. 26908 Prepared for: CentraCare 1013 Hart Boulevard Monticello, MN 55362 2017 Monticello Hospital Addition Monticello, MN Details Date: 04/24/17 Sheet: 7 OF 8 0008615.00DTF01.dwg 0 2017 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 24" A / A I PLAN MANHOLE COVER TO BE CRETEX TYPE II WITH EITHER 27" ROUND OR 24"x36" MINIMUM OF TWO 2"� SQUARE OPENING ADJUSTING RINGS VARIES CONCRETE CATCH (SEE PLAN) BASIN MANHOLE } AND BASE TO BE I I CRETEX TYPE 433B SECTION A—A OR APPROVED EQUAL NOTE: 1. BASE TO BE GROUTED TO FORM A SMOOTH INVERT TO OUTLET. 2. PIPE CUT–OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE REQUIRED. 3. SEE DETAIL ST16 FOR CASTING TYPE. STANDARD MANHOLE LAST REVISED: 04/27/12 ST03 STRUCTURE LOCATION CURB & GUTTER CURB & GUTTER ® LOW POINT SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER AT DRIVEWAY LOCATION STMH IN PAVEMENT OR GREEN SPACE CBMH IN PAVEMENT CBMH IN GREEN SPACE CBMH IN VALLEY GUTTER CASTING TYPE R -3067–L R-3067–VB R-3501 –R R-1642 STAMPED "STORM SEWER" R-2535 R-4342 R -3362–L Westwood STORM SEWER CASTING SCHEDULE LAST REVISED: 11/14/16 ST16 f DOWNSPOUT @--*— WIRE SCREEN FOR RODENTS 12" MAXIMUM 8" SCHEDULE 40 PVC SEE NOTE #2 WATER–TIGHT 450 BEND (SCH. 40 PVC) CONNECTION O O / STORM SEWER PIPE 1% MINIMUM SLOPE SEE NOTE #2 NOTES: 1. FOR ALL DEPTHS OF COVER LESS THAN TWO (2) FEET, PIPE MUST BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC. FOR DEPTHS OF COVER GREATER THAN TWO (2) FEET, FLEXIBLE PIPE MAY BE USED. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR ALLOWABLE PIPE TYPES. 2. A WATER–TIGHT CONNECTION SHALL BE MAINTAINED WITH ANY TRANSITION FROM SCHEDULE 40 PVC PIPE TO ANY OTHER PIPE TYPE. THE DOWNSPOUT COLLECTOR DRAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED BEFORE THE DOWNSPOUTS ARE INSTALLED ON THE BUILDING. SITEWORK CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WORK TO, AND INCLUDING, THE RODENT SCREEN. BUILDING CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONNECTION AT THE POINT OF THE RODENT SCREEN. LAST REVISED: Westwood DOWNSPOUT CONNECTION 07/28/15 ST19 Westwood Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 3701 12th Street North, Suite 206 St. Cloud, MN 56303 Phone 320-253-9495 Fax 320-253-8737 Toll Free 1-800-270-9495 westwoodps.com Designed: NIM Checked: BCW Drawn: NIM Record Drawing by/date: Revisions: 12/16/16 — DD 04/24/17 — City Submittal I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Brad C Wilkening Date 04/24/17 Prepared for: tkem No. 26908 CentraCare 1013 Hart Boulevard Monticello, MN 55362 2017 Monticello Hospital Addition Monticello, MN Details Date: 12/16/16 Sheet: 8 OF 8 0008615.00DTF01.dwg o2017 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Westwood Phone (320) 253-9495 3701 12th Street North, Suite 206 Fax (320) 358-2001 St. Cloud, MN 56303 Toll Free (800) 270-9495 weStwoodpS.Corn Westwood Professional Services, Inc. > hmPrepared for. BM CentraCare Maw= xe00rd D""'°a by/&W Monticello, MN 55362 2017 Monticello Hospital Addition Monticello, MN 0' 20' W. vate.03/29/17 Sheet 1 of 1 0008615SKF02.dwq Sidewalk Exhibit B ++ + + + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0. 0.0 0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 0 0.0 � 0 0.1 0. ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .1 0.2 0.8 ++ + + + + + + + + + + + W 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0. .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.3 11.8 D . W D Luminaire Schedule 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0. + .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.1 0.1 0.3 + .9 + 3 Symbol Qty Label LLF Description D 0 8 D - Portfolio - 6LB 0.850 LD6B30D010 EU6B30508040 6LBMH1 0. 0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0. 0. 0.0 + .0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1 0.3 . 9 2. 6 + + �.D 1 + 1 0 9 W1 - GPC - T3 - lA - 0 . 850 GPC -AF -OI -LED -EI -T3 Lo 3 xAA - GSM - 25OW - 3 0.850 GSM -XX -250 -MP -XX -3S -FG -XX -X 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + .0 0.0 + 0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 + 7 1. + .8 6. + 2 1.2 0 5 W2 - STILO - ASSYMET 0.850 1E2884_101_1xLED-NW-42W_- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0. 0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 1. 1.2 .4 6. 1. 8.3 5.6 7.4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +xAA + + + + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.0 1.0 1 3.4 4.5 6.5 7.6 9.1 .8 7. ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 .0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.6 1.5 2.1 3 5 5.6 6. 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.1 0.1 0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.8 1.3 2. .9 2.3 2.7 5.7 12. .9 W ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 .0 0.0 0.0 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0. .0 1.3 1.3 1.6 1.3 3.0 10.5 1 . W 0.0 .0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0 .0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 _ �= .2 0.4 0.5 0.6 1.0 1. 5.4 13. 4.3 0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + .0 0.0 0 .0 .0 0.0 0.0 0. .0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.1 0.1 0. 0. 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.9 2.2 i6.8 0. 0.2 0. 0.0 0.0 + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + + - + - +.0 + + + + + + + .0 .0 0.0 0.0 0. .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.1 0.1 0.1 .2 0.7 2.1 4.4 5.1 0.9 0 17.8 15.0 6. 2. 0.0 0. .0 0. .0 0.0 0.0 0 . 0/1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 .1 2.0 1.1 1.7 2.1 2. 13.6 14.4 6.4 2.9 1.4 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 .0 ,o ++ .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.x.1 0. 0. 0.4 0.9 1.8 2.6 3.7 3.3 7.2 .6 7.6 2.3 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0. 0.2 0. 0. 1.1 1.8 4.1 5.3 6.9 7.2 7.7 6.8 3.3 1.4 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 .0 .0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 + + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 .1 0. 0. 0.5 0.7 1.9 2. 5 x 12.0 7.7 5.7 3.7 1.6 1.1 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + X+ + + + + + + + +0 + + + / + + 0. 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 .2 0.5 0.9 1.0 2.4 4.8 8. .8 8. 5.1 3.2 2.1 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0. 0.2 0.6 1.1 1.2 2.1 .5 8. 5 3.9 2.0 1.2 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0. 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 ++ .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.9 1. 1.5 .2 .5 5. 2.9 1.7 1.0 0. 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.1 0.3 .6 1.1 1. 1.5 2.2 2.5 1.8 1.1 0.4 .2 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .1 0.1 0. 1.0 1. 1.2 1.0 0.7 0. 0.2 0. .1 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 + + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .1 0.1 0.3 .6 0.9 1.1 0.8 .4 0 2 0. 0.1 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.2 + 0.1 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 SITE PLAN PHOTOMETRICS 1/16" = 1'-0" PROJECT MONTICELLO ED REMODEL CENTRACARE HEALTH 1013 HART BLVD MONTICELLO, MN 55362 DUNHAM Dunham Associates, Inc. 50 South Sixth Street / Suite 1100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-1540 PHONE 612.465.7550 FAX 612.465.7551 WEB dunhameng.com mechanical + electrical consulting engineering CONSULTANTS CERTIFICATION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Signature Name WILLIAM E. EVANS Date 04/24/17 Registration Number 42386 REVISIONS No. Date Description THIS SHEET MAY BE A REDUCED COPY. THE BAR ABOVE IS 1" LONG ON A FULL SIZE SHEET. DRAWING SCALES APPLY TO FULL SIZE SHEETS. Date: 04/24/17 Drawn: CT Checked: WE SHEET TITLE SITE PLAN PHOTOMETRICS Sheet Number: E1 Project Number: 12571-16015 COPYRIGHT © 2014 DUNHAM ASSOCIATES, INC. z2017 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or caII81.1.com , Common Ground >og �eIliance > Site Legend General Site Notes PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE SETBACK LINE EASEMENT LINE CURB AND GUTTER TIP—OUT CURB AND GUTTER POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL RETAINING WALL FENCE CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK HEATED CONCRETE SIDEWALK HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NORMAL DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS TRANSFORMER SITE LIGHTING TRAFFIC SIGN POWER POLE BOLLARD / POST PROPOSED CANOPY SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS 1. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, THE ENGINEER SHOULD BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY. 2. REFER TO BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR LOT BEARINGS, DIMENSIONS AND AREAS. 3. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF EXITS, RAMPS, AND TRUCK DOCKS. 5. ALL CURB RADII ARE SHALL BE 3.0 FEET (TO FACE OF CURB) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGGERS AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS. 8. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 10. SITE LIGHTING SHOWN ON PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN PREPARED BY OTHERS FOR SITE LIGHTING DETAILS AND PHOTOMETRICS. 22.22 Ambulance Width Track Lock to Lock Steering Angie PROPOSED MRI ROOM FFE=935.91 0 Site Details (SI-OXX) Site Developm 1 B612 CURB & GUTTER 2 MOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER • EXISTING ZONING: 3 D418 CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED ZONING: 4 BITUMINOUS CURB 5 INTEGRAL CURB AND WALK • PARCEL DESCRIPTION 6 CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER 7 ENTRANCE THRU CURB AND GUTTER 8 PRIVATE CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPERTY AREA: 9 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP 10 PARALLEL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP • NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 11 CROSS WALK STRIPING 12 TEMPORARY BITUMINOUS CUL—DE—SAC 13 TRAFFIC ARROW 14 SIGN INSTALLATION 15 HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE AND STRIPING 16 PRECAST CONCRETE WHEEL STOP 17 TYPE 3 BARRICADE 18 BOLLARD 19 PAVEMENT SECTIONS 20 BITUMINOUS TRAIL 24 CONCRETE CURB AT SIDEWALK 25 CURB CUT WITH EROSION CONTROL MAT 28 MOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER CONSTRUCTION AT CATCH BASIN t 32 BEAVERTAIL CURB (13612) 4; Iff--mil-10 800 7 1 50 Tire 6,0 3116 LOT 1, BLOCK 1 MONTICELLO BIG LAKE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL DISTRICT CAMPUS SECOND ADDITION 13.89 AC 1,799 SF 0' 20' 40' 60' FOR PERMIT APPROVAL Westwood Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 3701 12th Street North, Suite 206 St. Cloud, MN 56303 Phone 320-253-9495 Fax 320-253-8737 Toll Free 1-800-270-9495 westwoodps.com Designed: Checked: Drawn: Record Drawing by/date: Revisions: 12/16/16 — DD 04/24/17 — City Submittal 05/24/17 — City Comments I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Brad C Wilkening Dates 04/24/17 Prepared for: License No. 26908 CentraCare 1013 Hart Boulevard Monticello, MN 55362 2017 Monticello Hospital Addition Monticello, MN Site Plan Date: 04/24/17 Sheet: 2 op 8 0008615SKF04.dwg x x a. dd PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE SETBACK LINE EASEMENT LINE CURB AND GUTTER TIP—OUT CURB AND GUTTER POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL RETAINING WALL FENCE CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK HEATED CONCRETE SIDEWALK HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NORMAL DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS TRANSFORMER SITE LIGHTING TRAFFIC SIGN POWER POLE BOLLARD / POST PROPOSED CANOPY SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS 1. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, THE ENGINEER SHOULD BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY. 2. REFER TO BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR LOT BEARINGS, DIMENSIONS AND AREAS. 3. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF EXITS, RAMPS, AND TRUCK DOCKS. 5. ALL CURB RADII ARE SHALL BE 3.0 FEET (TO FACE OF CURB) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGGERS AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS. 8. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 10. SITE LIGHTING SHOWN ON PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN PREPARED BY OTHERS FOR SITE LIGHTING DETAILS AND PHOTOMETRICS. 22.22 Ambulance Width Track Lock to Lock Steering Angie PROPOSED MRI ROOM FFE=935.91 0 Site Details (SI-OXX) Site Developm 1 B612 CURB & GUTTER 2 MOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER • EXISTING ZONING: 3 D418 CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED ZONING: 4 BITUMINOUS CURB 5 INTEGRAL CURB AND WALK • PARCEL DESCRIPTION 6 CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER 7 ENTRANCE THRU CURB AND GUTTER 8 PRIVATE CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPERTY AREA: 9 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP 10 PARALLEL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP • NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 11 CROSS WALK STRIPING 12 TEMPORARY BITUMINOUS CUL—DE—SAC 13 TRAFFIC ARROW 14 SIGN INSTALLATION 15 HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE AND STRIPING 16 PRECAST CONCRETE WHEEL STOP 17 TYPE 3 BARRICADE 18 BOLLARD 19 PAVEMENT SECTIONS 20 BITUMINOUS TRAIL 24 CONCRETE CURB AT SIDEWALK 25 CURB CUT WITH EROSION CONTROL MAT 28 MOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER CONSTRUCTION AT CATCH BASIN t 32 BEAVERTAIL CURB (13612) 4; Iff--mil-10 800 7 1 50 Tire 6,0 3116 LOT 1, BLOCK 1 MONTICELLO BIG LAKE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL DISTRICT CAMPUS SECOND ADDITION 13.89 AC 1,799 SF 0' 20' 40' 60' FOR PERMIT APPROVAL Westwood Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 3701 12th Street North, Suite 206 St. Cloud, MN 56303 Phone 320-253-9495 Fax 320-253-8737 Toll Free 1-800-270-9495 westwoodps.com Designed: Checked: Drawn: Record Drawing by/date: Revisions: 12/16/16 — DD 04/24/17 — City Submittal 05/24/17 — City Comments I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Brad C Wilkening Dates 04/24/17 Prepared for: License No. 26908 CentraCare 1013 Hart Boulevard Monticello, MN 55362 2017 Monticello Hospital Addition Monticello, MN Site Plan Date: 04/24/17 Sheet: 2 op 8 0008615SKF04.dwg WSB Building a legacy — your legacy. May 31, 2017 Ms. Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Centracare Health Monticello Site Plan Review City Project No. 2017-015 WSB Project No. 010150 Dear Ms. Schumann: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the civil plans, dated April 24, 2017, as prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. and offer the following comments. Utilitv Plan 1. Show the existing applicable drainage and utility easements over any public sanitary sewer and watermain within the project limits. 2. A utility excavation permit must be obtained from the Public Works department prior to commencement of utility connections. Coordinate with the City utility superintendent for any further requirements. 3. Provide an as -built utility plan once construction is complete. Details 4. Detail plates shall be updated per the City's April 2017 General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction located on the City's website - Engineering department. Stormwater Management 5. The proposed site improvement does not create 1 acre or more of new impervious surface, thus volume reduction is not required. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:\010150-000\Admin\Docs\LTR-a-schumann-Centracare 053117.docx May 31, 2017 Page 2 6. If 1 acre or more of the site is being disturbed, a NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit and SWPPP shall be provided prior to construction commencing. Please confirm the site disturbance area. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please give me a call at 763-271-3236 if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter. Thank you. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Shibani K. Bisson, PE City Engineer cc: Steve Grittman, NAC skb K:\010150-000\Admin\Docs\LTR-a-schumann-Centracare 053117.docx City Council Agenda — 06/12/2017 2S. Consideration to approve Ordinance No. 671 for amendments to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 4, Section 3 — Fences and Walls, Chapter 4, Section 5 for regulations for multi -tenant building signage, Chapter 5, Section 3 for regulations on Accessory Use Dwellings, and Chapter 5, Section 4 for regulations for Temporary Uses — Food Trucks. Applicant: Citv of Monticello (AS) Property: City of Monticello Planning Case Number: 2017-021 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND The City Council is asked to review for adoption various proposed amendments to the City's zoning ordinance. The amendments are proposed to provide clarity to existing ordinances, resolve conflict within code section language, and correspond to regulations recently adopted into the City Code. To follow is a summary of each proposed amendment: • 4.3 - Fencing & Walls o Amendment to regulations for fences and walls which clarify material type by district o Adding an allowance for low -profile "garden" fencing o Amendments consistent with Building Code, which allows fences up to 7' in height without building permit • 4.5 — Signs Amendment to allow individual tenant signs without separate exclusive entrance when a comprehensive sign plan is submitted; requires an administrative review only as proposed. As multi -tenant commercial and industrial building projects are developed in the community, it is becoming a more common request to accommodate such signage. In many cases, tenant spaces are served by a common door or vestibule, then breaking off into smaller spaces. The ordinance proposed restricts signage to the base code allowance of 15% of the fagade of the building fronting not more than two public streets, but expands sign allowances for individual tenants with or without the exclusive entrance. • 5.3 — Accessory Uses The Council is asked to strike "Accessory Dwelling Unit" provisions in their entirety. At the time the most recent codification of the zoning ordinance was 1 City Council Agenda — 06/12/2017 developed, "Accessory Dwelling Units" was added to the listing of accessory uses in support of life -cycle housing options. Accessory Dwelling Units are defined as "A dwelling unit, either within the same building as the single- family dwelling unit or in a detached building. Accessory dwelling units shall be developed in accordance with the standards set forth in this ordinance and only in those zoning districts where permitted." Accessory dwelling units are permitted as accessory in single and two family residential districts under current code allowances. Given recent legal activity regarding these uses, particularly for detached accessory dwelling units, and the changing nature of these uses in terms of permanent, temporary and moveable structures, staff is proposing at this time to remove the allowance from the code. The recommendation is further supported by the idea that the Commission and City Council would best served by regulations developed after some of the more substantive legal questions are settled and additional research and case studies can be brought to both groups for review and discussion. An interim ordinance is not recommended due to the unknown time frame under which some of the legal issues would be settled. The definition for the use is also proposed for removal at this time. Council will note that striking these provisions does not impact two-family allowances in the R-2 District (such as duplexes). • 5.4 — Temporary Uses The Council is asked to amend the table for temporary uses consistent with ordinances recently adopted by the City Council relating to food trucks. The City Code allows food trucks by permit and as such, the Zoning Ordinance is proposed to be amended simply to note the allowance and refer to the applicable City Code section. PlanninLFCommission Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed this item on June 6th, 2017 and held a public hearing on the proposed amendments The Commission indicated support for the proposed amendments and requested that staff begin pulling together information for a future workshop on accessory dwelling units. No members of the public were present to address the Commission on this item. The Commission unanimously recommended the amendments. 2 City Council Agenda — 06/12/2017 B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Planning Commission recommends Alternative #1 below. 1. Motion to adopt Ordinance 671, for amendments to Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 4, Section 3 — Fences and Walls; Chapter 4, Section 5 for regulations for multi -tenant building signage, Chapter 5, Section 3 for regulations on Accessory Use Dwellings, and Chapter 5, Section 4 for regulations for Temporary Uses — Food Trucks, based on findings in Resolution PC -2017-015. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Ordinance 671, for amendments to Chapter 4, Section 3 — Fences and Walls; Chapter 4, Section 5 for regulations for multi -tenant building signage, Chapter 5, Section 3 for regulations on Accessory Use Dwellings, and Chapter 5, Section 4 for regulations for Temporary Uses — Food Trucks, based on findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion to table action for additional information. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the adoption of the proposed ordinance amendments. As noted in the introduction, the proposed amendments serve to add clarity to existing ordinances, resolve conflict within code sections, and correspond to regulations recently adopted into the City Code. In addition, the removal of provisions for accessory dwelling units at this time allows the City the ability to consider the use in relationship to its Comprehensive Plan objectives, as well as the appropriate specific standards applicable to the use and various zoning districts. D. SUPPORTING DATA: a. Resolution PC -2017-015 b. Draft — Ordinance No. 671 c. Excerpt, Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Various Sections 3 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-015 RECOMMENDING AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING CODE RELATED TO MISCELLANEOUS SECTIONS WHEREAS, the Zoning Ordinance serves as the primary implementation tool of the City's Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives; and WHEREAS, various portions of the Zoning Ordinance have been identified as benefitting from amendment to increase clarity and usefulness; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 6th, 2017 on the application and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has identified ordinance amendments to clarify various chapters and sections with changes to the following: • CHAPTER 4, SECTION 3 — FENCES AND WALLS • CHAPTER 4, SECTION 5(J) —DISTRICT REGULATIONS • CHAPTER 5, SECTION 3(C) — TABLE 5-4: ACCESSORY USES BY DISTRICT • CHAPTER 5, SECTION 3(D) — ADDITIONAL SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN ACCESSORY USES • CHAPTER 5, SECTION 4(D) — TABLE 5-6: TEMPORARY USES & STRUCTURES • CHAPTER 8, SECTION 4(B) — DEFINITIONS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed amendments improve the ability of the Planning Commission and City Council to direct land use and land use policy in the City. 2. The proposed amendments are consistent with the language and intent of the Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Commission recommends that the City Council adopts the proposed amendments as presented and approved. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-015 ADOPTED this 6t' day of June, 2017 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Brad Fyle, Chair ATTEST: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director K ORDINANCE NO.6XX CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, ADDRESSING THE FOLLOWING: • CHAPTER 4, SECTION 3 — FENCES AND WALLS • CHAPTER 4, SECTION 5(J) —DISTRICT REGULATIONS • CHAPTER 5, SECTION 3(C) — TABLE 5-4: ACCESSORY USES BY DISTRICT • CHPATER 5, SECTION 3(D) — ADDITIONAL SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN ACCESSORY USES • CHAPTER 5, SECTION 4(D) — TABLE 5-6: TEMPORARY USES & STRUCTURES • CHAPTER 8, SECTION 4(B) — DEFINITIONS IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: Section 1. Chapter 4, Section 3 — Fences and Walls, is hereby amended to read as follows: (D) Fences and Walls by District Type (1) Residential Districts In residential districts (see Table 3-1: Base Zoning Districts), fences and walls shall conform to the following: (b) Side or Rear Yards (i) Fences and walls shall not exceed a height of sevens (76) feet in side and rear yards. (2) Business Districts (a) General In business districts (see Table 3-1: Base Zoning Districts), fences and walls shall not be permitted in front yards sethaekexcept as may be allowed by the security provisions of this section, and shall not exceed a height of f of feet it the remainder- of fent • arcs a -E eight seven (7) feet in side or rear yards., tmiess the fenee in the side or- rear- yar-d is leea4ed wit..& ,S feet „v ., ..ubli r-igM of way, ; ...k�ok oaz�t "? nct�xeeed height of six feet. If a fence is constructed on top of a retaining or other wall, the combined height of the fence and wall shall not exceed the maximum height that would apply to a fence or wall alone. ORDINANCE NO.6XX (3) Industrial Districts (a) Industrial and Business Campus District (i) Fences and walls shall not be permitted in front yards szObaol; ar-eas; (ii) Fences shall adhere to the following yard -based requirements: 1. fir. all ffei4 yards, a ca aW.l not o ee six (6) feet in .eight ,,n shall be at le 0% 2. In all side yards, a fence shall not exceed seven si* (76) feet in height. 3. In all rear yards, a fence shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height provided a building permit is obtained for any additional height over seven (7) feet. (iii) In no event shall a fence exceed seven six (76) feet in height if the fence is located within 4-5 (20) feet of a public right-of-way. (b) I-1 and I-2 Districts (i) In all f at4 yards, a fence shall not (6) feet in height and shall be at least 509 t.ansp,, -ons ■sr:rse! ....... IrrrYr.�.M.WMILAW.. (iii) Fences and walls shall not be permitted in front yards set�..�; (iv) Fences shall adhere to the following yard -based requirements: 4. In all 4; e fA, yards, ., fene0 shall Ret o e s ., (ti) feet i height .,n 5. In all side and rear yards, a fence shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height provided a building permit is obtained for any additional height over seven (7) feet. (v) In no event shall a fence exceed seven six (76) feet in height if the fence is located within 44 (20) feet of a public right-of-way. (J) Appearance 1. Customary Materials Fences and walls shall be constructed of any combination of treated wood posts and vertically-oriented planks; metal materials of 14 gauge bet4e,-, ,feateA with faetefy applied weather- aci;tnan"oa ' , and framed at top and baw)m w44 poFmit4e m4er-i l�, maintenance free vinyl, rot -resistant wood; wrought iron; decorative metal materials; brick; stone; or masonry materials.; ,.duets designed to Fee l.le these fna4efials. Where wood, 2 ORDINANCE NO.6XX masonry, or other opaque materials are specified for particular types of screening or buffering fences or walls, all other fence materials are prohibited. (a) In residential districts, metal materials of 14 gauge or better; when treated with factory -applied weather resistant coating or galvanized; and framed at top and bottom with materials as listed in section (J)(1) above are permitted. (b) Metal or vinyl fence used for garden areas in residential areas may not exceed 24" in height. (c) In the I-2 District, metal fences maybe permitted when the materials have been recycled and reprocessed to resemble new building materials and are designed for use as a fencing material, and when such materials are designed to resemble allowed materials as listed in section (J)(1) above. Section 2. Chapter 4, Section 5(J) — Signs, District Regulations is hereby amended to read as follows: J)(2)(d) Multiple Occupancy Commercial and Industrial Buildings (i) €rcpt ro pTo:teaw, c\hangaable to signs in this Individual tenants of a multiple occupancy building within a commercial or industrial zoning district shall not display separate wall, canopy, or marquee signs unless the te,. 3 k/as�noaz lhvan axelusive x,efier- enti-7 nee and subjeet to except through administrative siteplan submittal review of a comprehensive sign plan subject to the following requirements: 1. €eeh Such signs shall be limited to the maximum wall sign size permitted in the applicable zoning district provisions in Section 4.5(J). 2. Such signs shall be located only on than exterior wall of the tcnan"raae- khich t!hc,-,kgn r,e it iz4azaea, but af ^ n at ;rod to fee ^ abutting a public street and shall be located on not more than two exterior walls which face a public street. Section 5. Chapter 5, Section 3(C) — Table 5-4: Accessory Uses by District is hereby amended to read as follows: ORDINANCE NO.6XX Section 6. Chapter 5, Section 3(D) —Additional Standards for Specific Accessory Uses is hereby amended to read as follows: !hl A mafe than o aeeessefy d-we11;,.. , * tir,7 L'ulz p-mAtted, (e) Detaehe 7 aecessor-y ,awoll;„ p,31hall'a„ orsputiNe .fie (d) Oeeupams uxit^ ^ e limited to the 4;.11,,, i g (i) Family members of the per -son eee"ying a ptiac-Trl j*n�,aw&\ Fon- ily embers ; elude p oxo, ohildron, oil�lixgs, gr-aadpafei}4s, auf4s, uncles y-struetuf e, and/or- the asseeiated !a -ad area of the (am') Emimplayee who provides ,,,,0,7;,,^1 ^nWo - pefsonal oan o oee"ant of tb, cp'il" y'� (e) n eeesse -„ dwellin bo pouttio e,7 ; e of the f 11,., ing 1eeat;,,r^, (i) Within the pr-c�pc! �yu,.4we (e.g. ^ lower- level apaftmefA); (iii) Petaehed a -ad behind the pf:iaeipal stfuettff e as a freestanding building or - (i) T-.ko aesessoi=y dwelling ,,,.;t must be a4aehed to the pr-ineipal pr-palknjokin a.4 have an operative inter-eonneeting door- with the pfineipal stme (i) The detaehed weessefy b unit -1m.11 ]�---a minimum oar(6) feet ff mis. d -.c pv«iixoipal. otruatur-e. (H) The ^ , dwelling unit ,f, ,^t be 1,,ea4e,7 i the same base distfiet Y'�'_�f'l0i'ra G.rc[ccc[xe-. 2 ORDINANCE NO.6XX (.) The use ,.f,..,, i+uf etefoa hemes tfa-vel t, ail ro, trailm, or as an meesser-y dwelling tinit shall be prohibited. (i) An aceessefy awz.kng ul -e a floor area of M least 300 square feet and shall not e*eeed 25 per-eent of the floor- . e j r� At least one, but no more thatwo, off streetpar-kingspaeac✓���J.? tie ,.,.,.vide, f aeeessofy dwelling ,mit yin addition to ther-equifed-off-street park-irg zee principal , e) (r) Aeeessefy dwelling , r;t&--dha1.1 nat be sola apai 4 f;. the pfineipal Aruotufe () A ceessory dwelling units shall no ;., .i,,;,-,,tane osvapct'or� Section 9. Chapter 5, Section 4(E) - Specific Standards for Temporary Uses, Table 5-6 - Temporary Uses & Structures is hereby amended to read as follows: Temporary Sale Section 11. Chapter 8, Section 4 - Definitions is hereby amended to include the following terms as defined, or redefined: dwellingDWELLING, ACCESSORY !JNIT: A dwelling unit, either- within the same building as the single family ", - x -i a detaehed Soil irk Aeeessefy dwelling units shall be developed in aecofdanee with the sta-ndafds set fofth in this or-dina-nee and e4y in these zoning distr-iets CTL\-:itt--d-. Section 12. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 13. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. 5 ORDINANCE NO.6XX Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, Administrator AYES: NAYS: CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.3 Fences & Walls Subsection (C) General Requirements for Fences and Walls 4.3 Fences & Walls (A) Purpose and Intent The purpose and intent of this section is to regulate the location, height, and appearance of fences and walls to maintain visual harmony within residential and business districts; protect adjacent properties from the indiscriminate placement and unsightliness of fences and walls; and ensure the safety, security, and privacy of properties. (B) ADDlicability (1) In General Unless exempted in accordance with Section 4.3(B)(2) below, the provisions of this section shall apply to the construction, reconstruction, or replacement of all fences or walls in the City. In the event of any conflict between the provisions of this section and any screening standard in Section 4.1(I), Screening, the latter shall govern. (2) Exemptions The following are exempted from the requirements of this section. (i) Development in the CCD District Development on lots in the CCD district is exempt from the standards of this section. (ii) Recreational Fencing Customary fencing provided as a part of a permitted tennis court, athletic field, or other recreational facility. (iii) Temporary Fencing Temporary fencing established around construction sites, demolitions, or other site conditions unsafe for pedestrians or vehicles, provided it is consistent with the building code. (C) General Requirements for Fences and Walls (1) Location (a) Fences and walls are permitted anywhere on a lot subject to the following restrictions: City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 225 CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.3 Fences & Walls Subsection (C) General Requirements for Fences and Walls (i) The corner visibility requirements in Section 3.3(D)(2)(b) shall be met. (ii) Fences and walls shall not be located within public right-of-way unless permitted by the Community Development Department by written encroachment agreement. (iii) Fences and walls permitted by the Community Development Department to be within easements are subject to removal without compensation to the property owner if the City must access the area for maintenance or improvement purposes. (iv) Fences and walls shall not be permitted within conservation easements unless specifically permitted by the easement. (b) Fences and walls may be located directly over a property line between two or more parcels of land held in private ownership. (c) A certificate of survey may be required by the Community Development Department to determine the location of fences and walls on a property. (2) Blocking Natural Drainage Flow (a) No fence shall be installed so as to block or divert a natural drainage flow on to or off of any other land. (b) Drainage swales may not be filled to accommodate the construction of fences section 4.10: Grading. Drainage, or walls without alternate storm water provisions being reviewed and Stormwater approved by the Community Development Department. Management & Erosion Control (c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent the installation of temporary fencing to protect existing trees, limit sedimentation, or control erosion. (3) Fences and Walls within Buffers Fences and walls shall be installed so as not to disturb or damage existing Section 4.30 Perimeter Fences vegetation or installed plant material. The perimeter fencing or wall for a single and Walls Abutting development shall be of a uniform style that complies with the standards of this Public Right-of-Wav section. (4) Permit Requirements (a) A building permit is required for the construction of any fence or wall that will be more than seven (7) feet in height above grade, or for construction of a retaining wall that is more than four (4) feet in height from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall. Page 226 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.3 Fences & Walls Subsection (D) Requirements for Fences and Walls by District Type (b) Fences which do not require a building permit under the provisions of Section 4.3(D)(4)(a) above may be constructed without a permit, but shall adhere to all fencing requirements in this ordinance. (D) Requirements for Fences and Walls by District Twe All fences and walls shall conform to the following standards. In all cases, heights are measured from finished grade on the highest side of the fence or wall. (1) Residential Districts In residential districts (see Table 3-1: Base Zoning Districts), fences and walls shall conform to the following: (a) Front Yards Fences and walls shall not exceed a height of four (4) feet in front yards and that part of side yards from the front lot line to the front building line. (b) Side or Rear Yards (i) Fences and walls shall not exceed a height of six (6) feet in side and rear yards. (ii) In side or rear yards which abut a public street, fences or walls which exceed thirty-six (36) inches in height must be set back at least six (6) feet from the property line, and the setback area shall be landscaped in accordance with the provisions of Section 4.3Q)(4), Appearance. (c) Transparency Fences or walls located within a front yard or side yard adjacent to a street shall maintain a minimum of 50 percent transparency. (d) Access Where any fence or wall connects to a building used as a dwelling, at least one gate not less than 2 feet 6 inches in width shall be required to allow access around the building. City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 227 CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.3 Fences & Walls Subsection (D) Requirements for Fences and Walls by District Type (2) Business Districts (a) General In business districts (see Table 3-1: Base Zoning Districts), fences and walls See also Section shall not be permitted in front setback areas, and shall not exceed a height of 3.30)(2)(b) Corner Visibilitv, for four feet in the remainder of front yards and eight feet in side or rear yards, additional unless the fence in the side or rear yard is located within 15 feet of a public restrictions on fence Placement. right-of-way, in which case it shall not exceed a height of six feet. If a fence is constructed on top of a retaining or other wall, the combined height of the fence and wall shall not exceed the maximum height that would apply to a 2. In all side yards, a fence shall not exceed six (6) feet in height. fence or wall alone. (b) Major Utilities, Wireless Communications, Government Facilities, and Other Public Safety Uses Fences and walls in front, side, and rear yards of major utilities, wireless communication towers, government facilities, and other public safety uses shall not exceed eight feet. (3) Industrial Districts (a) Industrial and Business Campus District (i) Fences and walls shall not be permitted in front setback areas; (ii) Fences shall adhere to the following yard -based requirements: 1. In all front yards, a fence shall not exceed six (6) feet in height and shall be at least 50% transparent. 2. In all side yards, a fence shall not exceed six (6) feet in height. 3. In all rear yards, a fence shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height provided a building permit is obtained for any additional height over seven (7) feet. See also Section (iii) In no event shall a fence exceed six (6) feet in height if the fence is 3.30)(2)(b) Corner Visibilitv, for located within 15 feet of a public right-of-way. additional restrictions on fence (b) I-1 and I-2 Districts placement. (i) In all front yards, a fence shall not exceed six (6) feet in height and shall be at least 50% transparent. (ii) In all side and rear yards, a fence shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height provided a building permit is obtained for any additional height over six (6) feet. Page 228 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.3 Fences & Walls Subsection (F) Perimeter Fences and Walls Abutting Public Rights -of -Way (4) Vacant Property Vacant property may be fenced if the fence does not exceed four feet in residential districts and eight feet in business or industrial districts, the fencing maintains a minimum transparency of 50%, and the purpose of the fencing is to discourage unauthorized dumping or unauthorized parking on the property. Fencing of the vacant property shall not be construed to allow use of the property for outdoor storage. (E) Exemption for Securitv Plan A property owner or tenant or a representative of a public agency responsible for a government facility, public safety use, or other use in need of heightened security may submit to the Community Development Department a site security plan proposing fences or walls taller than those permitted by this section or proposing the use of barbed or concertina wire atop a fence or wall for security reasons. The Community Development Department may approve or approve with conditions the site security plan and its proposed exemption of fences or walls from the standards of this section, upon finding: (1) Taller Fence or Wall Needed for Safety or Security Reasons The condition, location, or use of the property, or the history of activity in the area, indicates the land or any materials stored or used on it are in significantly greater danger of theft or damage than surrounding land, or represent a significant hazard to public safety without a taller fence or the use of barbed or concertina wire atop a fence or wall; and (2) Not Have Security, Functioning Appearance of Adjacent Properties The proposed taller fences or walls or use of barbed or concertina wire will not have a significant adverse effect on the security, functioning, appearance, or value of adjacent properties or the surrounding area as a whole. (F) Perimeter Fences and Walls Abutting Public Rights-of-Wav (1) Fences or walls located within 15 feet of a street or public right-of-way shall: (a) Be of a uniform style; (b) Be located outside the public right-of-way; (c) Include breaks, offsets, access points, or other design details in the wall plane at least every 200 feet; City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 229 CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.3 Fences & Walls Subsection (H) Chain Link Fencing (d) Comply with the standards in Section 4.3(J), Appearance; and (e) Comply with the requirements of Section 4.1(I), Standards for Required Screening (if applicable). (2) New residential developments shall be required to construct conforming fencing along the rear yards of all double frontage lots that back up to collector or arterial roadways. (G) Prohibited Fences (1) Fences or walls made of debris, junk, rolled plastic, sheet metal, plywood, wooden landscape lattice or waste materials are prohibited in all zoning districts unless such materials have been recycled and reprocessed for marketing to the general public as building materials that resemble new building materials and are designed for use as a fencing material (e.g., picket fencing made from recycled plastic and fiber). No metal "t" posts shall be permitted. (H) Chain Link Fencing Chain link fencing shall be allowed, subject to the following standards: (1) All Districts In all districts, chain link fences must have a top rail, and barbed ends must be placed at the bottom of the fence. (2) Residential Districts Chain link fencing is permitted on lots within residential zoning districts provided it does not include opaque slats, and does not exceed a height of four (4) feet. (3) Business Districts Chain link fencing shall not be allowed on lots within a business zoning district unless expressly authorized through approval of a security plan under the provisions of Section 4.3(E). (4) Industrial Districts Chain link fencing shall be allowed on lots within industrial zoning districts provided it does not include opaque slats and is coated with black or dark green vinyl. Page 230 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.3 Fences & Walls Subsection 6) Appearance (I) Barbed or Razor Wire Barbed or razor wire is prohibited except as expressly authorized through approval of a security plan under the provisions of Section 4.3(E). (.n Appearance (1) Customary Materials Fences and walls shall be constructed of any combination of treated wood posts and vertically-oriented planks; metal materials of 14 -gauge or better, treated with factory -applied weather resistant coating or galvanized, and framed at top and bottom with permitted materials; rot -resistant wood; wrought iron; decorative metal materials; brick; stone; masonry materials; or products designed to resemble these materials. Where wood, masonry, or other opaque materials are specified for particular types of screening or buffering fences or walls, all other fence materials are prohibited. (2) Finished Side to Outside Wherever a fence or wall is installed, if one side of the fence or wall appears more "finished" than the other (e.g., one side has visible support framing and the other does not), then the more "finished" side of the fence shall face the perimeter of the lot rather than the interior of the lot. (3) Compatibility of Materials along a Single Lot Side All fencing or wall segments located along a single lot side shall be composed of a uniform style and colors compatible with other parts of the fence and with the associated buildings. (4) Landscape Screening All fences and walls exceeding four feet in height and located within 15 feet of a public street right-of-way in all districts, or as otherwise required by this ordinance, shall be supplemented with landscape screening in accordance with the following standards to soften the visual impact of the fence or wall. (a) Shrubs Required One evergreen shrub shall be installed for every fifteen linear feet of fence or wall, on the side of the fence or wall facing the public street right-of-way. Shrubs shall meet the size standards of Section 4.1(C)(2) Planting Standards, and may be installed in a staggered, clustered, grouped, or linear fashion. City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 231 CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.4 Exterior Lighting Subsection (A) Purpose (b) Substitution of Understory Trees One understory or ornamental tree may be substituted for every three evergreen shrubs provided that the tree meets the size standards of Section 4.1(C)(2) Planting Standards. (c) Integration with other Required Landscaping Required landscape screening for fences or walls may be integrated into the landscaping required for vehicular use area screening or perimeter buffers, provided the standards in Section 4.1 Landscaping and Screening Standards, are maintained. (5) Maintenance Required Every fence or wall must be maintained in a condition of reasonable repair and shall not be allowed to become and remain in a condition of disrepair or danger or constitute a nuisance. Fences or walls in a state of disrepair may be removed by the City as provided by Minnesota Statutes. The cost of removing fences may be levied against the property as a special assessment. 4.4 Exterior Lighting (A) Purvose The purpose of this section is to regulate light spillage and glare to ensure the safety of motorists and pedestrians, and to ensure lighting does not adversely affect land uses on adjacent properties. More specifically, this section is intended to: (1) Regulate Exterior Lighting to Mitigate Adverse Impacts Regulate exterior lighting to assure that excessive light spillage and glare are not directed at adjacent properties, neighboring areas, and motorists; (2) Ensure Proper Insulation Ensure that all site lighting is designed and installed to maintain adequate lighting levels on site while limiting negative lighting impacts on adjacent lands; and (3) Provide Security Provide security for persons and land. Page 232 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTER 4: FINISHING STANDARDS Section 4.6 Underground Utilities Subsection U) District Regulations (W) Except as provided by window, changeable copy, or temporary signs in this ordinance, individual tenants of a multiple occupancy building within a commercial or industrial zoning district shall not display separate wall, canopy, or marquee signs unless the tenant's business has an exclusive exterior entrance and subject to the following requirements: 1. Each sign shall be limited to the maximum wall sign size permitted in the applicable zoning district provisions in Section 4.5(J). 2. The sign shall be located only on the exterior wall of the tenant space to which the sign permit is issued, but are not required to face a public street. 3. A comprehensive sign plan is submitted that includes all of the following information: a. A site plan to scale showing the location of lot lines, buildings, structures, parking areas, existing and proposed signs, and any other physical features of the area included within the proposed comprehensive sign plan. b. Elevations to scale of buildings included within the comprehensive sign plan including the location of existing or proposed wall, canopy, or marquee signs. c. To scale plans for all existing and proposed signs of any type included within the comprehensive sign plan indicating area, dimensions, height, materials, colors, and means of illumination (if any). 4. No permit shall be issued for a new or replacement sign for an individual tenant except upon a determination by the Community Development Department that it is consistent with the approved comprehensive sign plan. 4.6 Underground Utilities All utilities within or serving new development [e.g. cable television, electrical (excluding transformers), gas, sewer, telephone, and water lines] shall be placed underground. Page 252 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (C) Table of Permitted Accessory Uses (3) Table of Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures Accessory Building — P P P P P P P C P P P P P P P P L3 Adult Use — accessory Agricultural Buildings Automated Teller Machines (ATMs) Automobile Repair — Major Automobile Repair — Minor Boarder(s) Bulk Fuel Sales/Storage Cocktail Room (Retail Sales Accessory to Micro - Distillery) Co -located Wireless Telecommunications Antennae Commercial Canopies Commercial Transmission/ Reception Antennae/ Structures Donation Drop-off Containers Drive -Through Services Entertainment/Recreation — Outdoor Commercial Fences or Walls P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Greenhouse/Conservatory P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P (non-commercial) Heliports C C C C C Home Occupations P P P P P P P P P P Indoor Food / P P P P P P P P Convenience Sales 4.3 5.3(D)(I 6) 5.3(D) 17 5.3(D)(18) 5.3 D 19 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 369 —1 C 5.3(D)(4) 55.3(D)(5) P P P P P P P P P L3 C 5.3(D)(7) C C 5.3(D)(8) P P P 5.3(D)(9) P P P C C C 5.3(D)(10) C C C C C C 5.3(D)(I 1) C C C C C C C C 4.13(E) P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(12) C C C C C C 4.13(D) P P 5.3 D 13 P P P C P P P I 5.3(D)(14) C C C C 7 5.3D 15 C C C C C C C C Fences or Walls P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Greenhouse/Conservatory P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P (non-commercial) Heliports C C C C C Home Occupations P P P P P P P P P P Indoor Food / P P P P P P P P Convenience Sales 4.3 5.3(D)(I 6) 5.3(D) 17 5.3(D)(18) 5.3 D 19 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 369 CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (D) Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessory Uses Wind Energy Conversion C C C C C 5.3(D)(35) System, Commercial I Wind Energy Conversion C C C C C C C C C C C C C CI C C 5.3(D)(36) System, Non-commercial Wireless j__3 (E) Telecommunications C C C C C C C Support Structures 4'3(F) (D) Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessory Uses (1) Accessory Dwelling (a) Accessory dwelling units are permitted only on lots with single-family detached dwellings. (b) No more than one accessory dwelling unit per lot is permitted. (c) Detached accessory dwellings shall be architecturally compatible with the principal dwelling. (d) Occupants of accessory dwelling units are limited to the following: (i) Family members of the person occupying the principal structure. Family members include parents, children, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins of an occupant of the primary structure. (ii) Employee of the occupant of the principal structure whose employment is directed to the principal structure and/or the associated land area of the principal structure. (iii) Employee who provides medical and/or personal care services to an occupant of the primary structure. (e) Accessory dwelling units shall be positioned in one of the following locations: (i) Within the principal structure (e.g. a lower level apartment); (ii) Attached to the principal building; (iii) Detached and behind the principal structure as a freestanding building or above a detached outbuilding. City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 371 CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section S.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (D) Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessory Uses (f) Attached accessory dwelling units shall adhere to the following: (i) The accessory dwelling unit must be attached to the principal structure and have an operative interconnecting door with the principal structure. (ii) Access to the unit shall only be from the side or rear yard of the principal structure. (g) Detached accessory dwelling units shall adhere to the following: (i) The detached accessory dwelling unit shall be a minimum of six (6) feet from the principal structure. (ii) The accessory dwelling unit must be located in the same base zoning district as the principal structure. (h) The use of manufactured homes, travel trailers, campers, tractor trailers, or similar vehicles as an accessory dwelling unit shall be prohibited. (i) An accessory dwelling unit shall have a floor area of at least 300 square feet and shall not exceed 25 percent of the floor area in the principal structure. (j) At least one, but no more than two, off-street parking spaces shall be provided for an accessory dwelling unit (in addition to the required off-street parking serving the principal use). (k) Accessory dwelling units shall not be sold apart from the principal structure. (1) Accessory dwelling units shall not include home occupations. (2) Accessory Building — Minor (a) Minor accessory buildings do not require a building permit, but shall comply with all applicable zoning regulations. (b) In the M -H district, one minor accessory building for storage of equipment and refuse is permitted for each manufactured home provided the accessory building can meet all required setbacks, and is designed of weather resistant material that will enhance the general appearance of the lot. Page 372 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section SA Temporary Uses Subsection (E) Specific Standards for Temporary Uses (E) Specific Standards for Temoorary Uses (1) Construction Dumpster (a) The placement of a temporary construction dumpster or other trash receptacle within a public right-of-way or other site owned by the City shall be subject to standards in the Monticello City code as may be applicable. (b) Temporary trash receptacles or dumpsters located outside public rights -of way are not required to obtain a temporary use permit, but shall comply with the following standards: (i) Be located to the side or the rear of the site, to the maximum extent practicable; (ii) Be located as far as possible from lots containing existing development; (iii) Not be located within a floodplain or otherwise obstruct drainage flow; (iv) Not be placed within five feet of a fire hydrant or within a required landscaping area; and (v) Be located outside of any required tree protection fencing and the dripline of existing trees. Page 394 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance 5-6: TEMPORARY USES & STRUCTURES TemporaryTABLE Requirements Temporary Structure (cont. Temporary Sign 120 days per year Yes Sec 4.501 Temporary Storage in a 30 days per year Yes Sec 5.40(6) Portable Container Tents, Canopies, Tarp 30 days per year Yes Sec 5.40(7) Garages, and Hoop Buildings Temporary Sale Farmer's Market Continuous; up to 5 months per year on Yes 5.400 Sec 5.4 a single site Garage/Yard Sale 4 days per event; 3 events total per No Sec 5.4001calendar year Seasonal Sales 60 days per permit; 120 days per Yes Sec 5.4(El(7) & calendar year maximum term Sec 5.4(E)(I 1) Temporary Merchant See Title 3. Chapter 10 of Citv Code Wayside Stands See Title 3. Chapter 10 of Citv Code Special Events Special Events See Title 3. Chapter 10 of Citv Code (E) Specific Standards for Temoorary Uses (1) Construction Dumpster (a) The placement of a temporary construction dumpster or other trash receptacle within a public right-of-way or other site owned by the City shall be subject to standards in the Monticello City code as may be applicable. (b) Temporary trash receptacles or dumpsters located outside public rights -of way are not required to obtain a temporary use permit, but shall comply with the following standards: (i) Be located to the side or the rear of the site, to the maximum extent practicable; (ii) Be located as far as possible from lots containing existing development; (iii) Not be located within a floodplain or otherwise obstruct drainage flow; (iv) Not be placed within five feet of a fire hydrant or within a required landscaping area; and (v) Be located outside of any required tree protection fencing and the dripline of existing trees. Page 394 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance City Council Agenda — 6/12/17 4A. Consideration of a request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment reguiding Outlots C & D. Otter Creek Crossing from `Places to Shop' to `Places to Work' and a request for Rezoning the subiect parcels from a B-4 (Regional Business) District to a I-1 (Light Industrial) District. Applicant: Jim Bowers and John Chadwick (NAC) Property: Outlot C & D, Otter Creek Crossing 155-171-000030 & 155-171-000040 Lengthy Legals for Parcels Planning Case Number: 2017-013 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Amend Land Use Designation from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Work"; Rezone two parcels of property from B-4 Regional Business to I-1 Light Industrial Deadline for Decision: June 11th, 2017, extended to August 10th, 2017 Land Use Designation: Places to Shop Zoning Designation: B-4 (Regional Business) District The purpose of the `B-4" regional business district is to provide for the establishment of commercial and service activities which draw from and serve customers from the entire community or region. Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: Freeway Bonus Sign District Current Site Use: Vacant Lot Surrounding Land Uses: North: R-3 Medium Density Residential District; B-2 Limited Business District (across I-94) East: B-4 Regional Business District South: I-1 Light Industrial District West: I-1 Light Industrial District Project Description: The applicants seek to change the land use map for two vacant parcels of land from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Work". In addition, the applicants wish to rezone said parcels from B-4 Regional Business to I-1 Light Industrial. City Council Agenda — 6/12/17 ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan Amendment. As noted above, the applicants are seeking an amendment to the "Land Use Plan Map" which can be found in the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, a Comprehensive Plan amendment is necessary. I-94 Interchanze Studv. In 2016, the City undertook a land use analysis as a part of the ongoing I-94 Interchange Study. The study examines the possibility of an interchange at the County Road 39 overpass. This is along the northern boundary of the northwest parcel. It should be noted that the study suggests this area should be zoned commercial if an interchange is constructed. However, as noted in the applicant's narrative, the City already has an abundance of vacant commercial zoning while industrial options are limited. In addition, the interchange study did not contemplate in depth the re -guiding of existing land uses within City boundaries. In support of the redesignation, the Comprehensive Plan identifies the northwest side of the City as needing to expand on existing "Places to Work". The Economic Development portion of the Plan promotes emphasis on this land use category, and the land use plan supports additional industrial growth in the northwest region. As noted above, the I-94 Interchange Study supports these strategies by identifying industrial land uses as a component of the land use mix for the area. While the "Places to Work" category is an important element in the City's growth and development, the Comprehensive Plan's Economic Development chapter focuses on tax base and job creation as the most important factors in seeking new industrial growth. At the same time, City staff reports an increase in industrial development interest that includes a component of outdoor storage. Outdoor storage, while it supports the principal business activity, does not create tax base or employment. Finding a balance point to promote industrial development is an element of the analysis in this case. The Zoning ordinance identifies the following factors for considering proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments: (a) Whether the proposed amendment corrects an error or addresses the need resulting from some changing condition, trend, or fact arising since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan; (b) Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the guiding principles of the Comprehensive Plan; (c) The extent to which the proposed amendment addresses a demonstrated community need; (d) Whether the proposed amendment will protect the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the public; 2 City Council Agenda — 6/12/17 (e) The impacts on the natural and built environments, including air, water, noise, stormwater management, wildlife habitat, water quality, vegetation, drainage, streets, and other engineering design or environmental factors; (f) Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject property; whether the proposed design and land uses are appropriate for the land; and whether the proposed amendment will maintain or improve compatibility among uses and ensure efficient development within the City; (g) Whether the proposed amendment will result in a logical, orderly and predictable development pattern; and (h) Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the purpose of this ordinance. Most of these factors are present in considering the proposed land use plan amendment, including changes in the needs and demands for industrial land. Designating the map for "Places to Work" as requested, and considering a rezoning of the property from B-4 to an industrial designation would support the City's economic development objectives for tax base and job creation. As such, the applicants' request appears to be consistent with the direction and policies of the current expectations of the Comprehensive Plan. It is conceivable that if an interchange is eventually planned at County 39, circumstances may suggest zoning which would allow for more commercial land uses nearest to the interchange location. Zoning. The subject site is zoned B-4 (Regional Business) District. The applicants are seeking to rezone the property to I-1 (Light Industrial) to be consistent with property across Chelsea Rd. W. However, City staff recognizes that the parcels are along I-94 which offers significant exposure to passing traffic, and the area serves as a western gateway to the community. In addition, the parcels also front Chelsea Road, a major collector route for the city. The parcels therefore are considered double -fronting and highly visible from both I-94 and Chelsea Road. In considering the appropriate zoning for the property, it is noted that a change to I-1 would allow for outdoor storage, while a change to IBC would accommodate many of the same light industrial uses, but would limit outdoor storage. IBC allows light industrial, offices, and other business type uses. Also as noted above, the potential issue of a freeway interchange at the County 39 location could impact the long-term 3 City Council Agenda — 6/12/17 land use demands on this site. In this regard, staff has examined to potential for both I-1 and IBC zoning designations for the subject parcels. Industrial District Covenants. In regard to consistency with the parcels across Chelsea Road, within the City -owned industrial park, it is important to note that private covenants apply. The purpose of the covenants was to ensure that the district would be developed with higher standards for buildings, site improvements (such as landscaping), and restrict outdoor storage activities. While these covenants would not apply to the properties subject to the rezoning, it is important to understand how the adjoining lands have developed to now, and are expected to further develop into the future. Thus, while the general designation is for "Places to Work", and the zoning designation is I-1, there is a higher level of development standards applied to that area. Lot Area and Width. The following table shows that the parcels will be conforming with the I-1 District standards as well as the IBC District standards. It should be noted that the table below represents an analysis of the parcels in their current configuration. Any future subdivision of the parcels would require platting, at which time the lot area, widths and setbacks would again be evaluated. Lot Area and Width Rezone to I-1 Light Industrial Parcel Lot Area Required Compliant Lot Required Compliant Business Campus Front 0 feet 30 feet Width Side (Interior) 0 feet Southeast 831,399 ft. 20,000 sq. ft. Yes 1,700 ft. 100 ft. Yes Northwest 831,393 ft. 20,000 sq. ft. Yes 900 ft. 100 ft. Yes Rezone to IBC Industrial Business Campus Parcel Lot Area Required Compliant Lot Required Compliant Width Southeast 831,399 ft. 8,000 sq. ft. Yes 1,700 ft. 100 ft. Yes Northwest 831,393 ft. 8,000 sq. ft. Yes 900 ft. 100 ft. Yes The two subject parcels will be compliant with the City's requirements for lot size and width in the I-1 District as well as the IBC. Setbacks. The following table shows the setback requirements for the B-4, I-1, and IBC districts: Setback Comparison M B-4 Regional I-1 Light Industrial IBC Industrial Business District District Business Campus Front 0 feet 30 feet 50 feet Side (Interior) 0 feet 15 feet 30 feet Side (Street) 0 feet 30 feet 50 feet Rear 0 feet 15 feet 40 feet M City Council Agenda — 6/12/17 From the table above, the properties' current zoning is the least restrictive of the three in terms of setback. The applicant should be aware that any rezoning will result in more restrictive setback requirements. It is noted that the IBC District imposes a greater setback requirement than does the I-1 District. However, the parcels are of adequate size to accommodate development under either district, so setbacks need not factor into the City's decision. Overlav District. The area is within the Freeway Bonus Sign District. This district allows for additional signage along I-94. The rezone would not exempt the parcels from this district. It should be noted that the area is also adjacent to the Special Use Overlay District. The City may wish to consider impacts of these overlay districts on development of the subject property as separate actions. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed the requests and held a public hearing on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning applications on May 2nd, 2017. The Planning Commission heard public comment from one of the applicants and property owner John Chadwick, and his representative Wayne Elam, regarding the request for comprehensive plan amendment and to rezone the subject parcels to I-1. Mr. Elam expressed that the applicants would prefer I-1 zoning designation, as it would provide for the ability to use the property for outdoor storage, versus the IBC recommendation of staff, which would limit that ability. No other public was present to address the Commission on the matter. The Planning Commission discussed the site and potential uses of the property under either the IBC or I-1 zoning designations. After discussion, the Planning Commission recommended to approve the Comprehensive Plan amendment reguiding the site to "Places to Work" and recommended rezoning the site to IBC (Industrial and Business Campus), citing the property's visible location along Chelsea Road and I-94 as a basis for their recommendation, in addition to those findings in the resolution PC -2017-008. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision 1: Comprehensive Plan Amendment (requires a supermajority vote of the City Council to approve) The Planning Commission recommends Alternative #1 below. Motion to adopt Resolution 2017 - XX to approve a Comprehensive Plan amendment reguiding the subject parcels to "Places to Work", based on findings in said resolution. 5 City Council Agenda — 6/12/17 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution 2017 - XX to approve a Comprehensive Plan amendment reguiding the subject parcels to "Places to Work", based on findings to be made by the City Council. Motion of other. Decision 2: Rezoning Request The Planning Commission recommends Alternative #1 below. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 6XX for rezoning of the subject parcels from B-4 (Regional Business) District to IBC (Light Industrial Business ) as recommended by staff and based on findings of the Planning Commission per resolution 2017 -PC -008. 2. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 6XX for rezoning of the subject parcels from B-4 (Regional Business) District to I-1 (Light Industrial District) as proposed in the application of April 1, 2017, based on findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution PC- 2017 — 008 for rezoning from B-4 Regional Business District, based on findings to be made by the City Council. 4. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION An amendment of the Comprehensive Plan requires consideration of the general goals and policies of the City for long-term land use, and how the proposed amendment would further those goals. In this case, it is noted that the City has a large inventory of undeveloped commercial property in the Highway 25 corridor, and the Comprehensive Plan recommends the inclusion of more industrial land uses toward the northwest. Commercial uses are better accommodated in concentrations along major accessible corridors, as well as in proximity to freeway interchanges. At the current time, there is not immediate freeway interchange near the subject property, although the City is engaged in a series of studies (currently focusing on Highway 25) to determine the possible location or locations for future interchange locations. As this determination is quite some time into the future, the industrial designation for the area appears to be appropriate. With regard to the specific industrial zoning district, the staff report notes that the high level of exposure to the freeway, as well as the covenant -enforced requirements on the adjoining industrial park to the southwest suggest that the IBC District would n City Council Agenda — 6/12/17 be more appropriate for the site than the I-1. Particularly given the restrictions on outdoor storage and allowance for certain commercial uses, the IBC District would better reflect the future development of the site in question. As such, staff recommends Alternative #1, approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment, and a rezoning to the IBC, Industrial Business Campus District. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution 2017-29 B. Ordinance No. 669 C. Resolution PC -2017-008 D. Planning Commission Minutes, May 2nd, 2017 E. Aerial Site Image F. Applicant Narrative G. Excerpt, Monticello Comprehensive Plan: a. Land Use Map b. Economic Development H. Commercial Land Inventory Map I. Industrial Land Inventory Map J. Excerpt, Monticello Zoning Ordinance a. IBC (Industrial Business Campus) b. I-1 (Light Industrial) c. Use Table K. Excerpt, Monticello Interchange Study a. Concept Maps L. Monticello Zoning Map 7 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-29 APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REDESIGNATING FROM "PLACES TO SHOP" TO "PLACES TO WORK" FOR OUTLOTS C & D, OTTER CREEK CROSSING WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to reguide the subject property, identified as Outlot C & D, Otter Creek Crossing and legally described in the attached "Exhibit A", resulting in a change from business-related land uses to industrial -related land uses; and WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to market the property for industrial users; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is consistent with the long-term use and development of the property suggested by the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City has experienced a need for additional industrial land through development inquiries; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 2, 2017 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission, all of the comments of the hearing, and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The land use plan amendment is an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site. 2. The use of the site for industrial development is consistent with the City's economic development objectives. 3. The amendment results in a land use designation that more closely achieves the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan than would the current regulations. 4. The amendment results in the potential for development that would be compatible and consistent with the existing surrounding land uses in the area. 6. The resulting land uses will have impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the subject property as proposed. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: The Monticello City Council approves the Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan redesignating the subject property as legally described in "Exhibit A" from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Work". ADOPTED BY the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota this 12th day of June, 2017. ATTEST: CITY OF MONTICELLO Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator Brian Stumpf, Mayor EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PARCELS PARCEL 1: That part of Outlot D, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota, lying southeasterly of a line parallel with and distant 1689.64 feet northwesterly of, as measured at right angles to the southeasterly line of said Outlot D. PARCEL 2: Outlot C, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. :►m That part of Outlot D, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota, lying northwesterly of a line parallel with and distant 1689.64 feet northwesterly of, as measured at right angles to the southeasterly line of said Outlot D. ORDINANCE NO. 669 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY FROM B-4, GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT TO IBC, INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS CAMPUS DISTRICT: OUTLOTS C AND D, OTTER CREEK CROSSING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. The zoning map of the City of Monticello is hereby amended to rezone the following described parcels from B-4, Regional Business to IBC, Industrial Business Campus District: PID NUMBERS: 155-171-000030 & 155-171-000040 (See attached Legal Description) Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this day of , 2017. Brian Stumpf, Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 669 ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, Administrator AYES: NAYS: ORDINANCE NO. 669 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PARCELS PARCEL 1: That part of Outlot D, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota, lying southeasterly of a line parallel with and distant 1689.64 feet northwesterly of, as measured at right angles to the southeasterly line of said Outlot D. PARCEL 2: Outlot C, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. AND That part of Outlot D, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota, lying northwesterly of a line parallel with and distant 1689.64 feet northwesterly of, as measured at right angles to the southeasterly line of said Outlot D. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-008 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REDESIGNATING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM "PLACES TO SHOP" TO "PLACES TO WORK", AND REZONING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM "B-4", REGIONAL BUSINESS TO "IBC", INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS CAMPUS" WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to reguide and rezone subject property, identified as Outlot C & D, Otter Creek Crossing, resulting in a change from business-related land uses to industrial -related land uses; and WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to market the property for industrial users; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments are consistent with the long-term use and development of the property suggested by the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City has experienced a need for additional industrial land through development inquiries; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 2, 2017 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The land use plan amendment and rezoning are an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site. 2. The use of the site for industrial development is consistent with the City's economic development objectives. 3. The amendments result in a land use designation that more closely achieves the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan than would the current regulations. 4. The amendments result in the potential for development that would be compatible and consistent with the existing surrounding land uses in the area. 6. The resulting land uses will have impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the subject property as proposed. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-008 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, redesignating the subject property from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Work", and adopts Ordinance No. rezoning the subject property from B-4, Regional Business to IBC, Industrial Business Campus. ADOPTED this 2nd day of May, 2017, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION L'In ATTEST: Brad Fyle, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 2 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, May 2°d, 2017 - 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Special Joint Meeting Mississippi Room - 5:00 PM Concept Stage Planned Unit Development for Detached Townhome Lots Applicant: Carlisle Village, LLC Present: John Alstad, Brad Fyle, Sam Murdoff, Marc Simpson, Lucas Wynne Council Liaison: Charlotte Gabler Staff: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), John Rued 1. General Business A. Call to Order Chairman Brad Fyle called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. B. Consideration of aoDrovine minutes a. Special Meeting Minutes — April 01, 2017 MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 4TH, 2017. MOTION SECONDED BY SAM MURDOFF SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0. b. Regular Meeting Minutes — April 411, 2017 MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 4TH, 2017. MOTION SECONDED BY SAM MURDOFF SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0. C. Citizen Comments None. D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda Marc Simpson asked to add an item at the end of agenda. 2. Public Hearings A. Public Hearing — Consideration of a reauest for Rezoning to Planned Unit Development, a request for Development Stage Planned Unit Development for Vehicle Sales and Rental, Auto Repair — Minor, and Accessory Office and Retail Uses in a B-3 (Hiehwav Business) District Applicant: FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC Brad Fyle announced that the applicant requested tabling action. Brad Fyle opened the public hearing. Hearing no comments, the public hearing was closed. SAM MURDOFF MOVED TO TABLE ACTION TO THE JUNE 6TH, 2017 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MARC SIMPSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0. B. Public Hearing — Consideration of a reauest for Comprehensive Plan Amendment for `Places to Shop' to `Places to Work' and a reauest for Rezoning from a B-4 (Regional Business) District to a I-1 (Light Industriall) District Applicant: Jim Bowers and John Chadwick Steve Grittman stated two parcels were included in the land use application request. The properties are referred to as the Bowers/Chadwick parcels and lie between I-94 and Chelsea Road. It is west of Moon Motorsports and adjacent to the City's industrial development park. Grittman noted that the area was previously rezoned from industrial to commercial due to the economy at the time. Since commercial development has not occurred, the applicants sought to re - guide the property from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Work" and rezone from B- 4 (Regional Business) District to I-1 (Light Industrial). Grittman explained that requests for re -guiding and rezoning, the City examines a number of factors that support the change. Surrounding land use patterns, adequate utilities and roadways, and City policies for Economic Development were all mentioned. The City notes that there is becoming a tighter demand for industrial land and they have been receiving inquiries routinely. Grittman noted that the request would be consistent with the industrial land designations located to the south and west of the parcels. Chelsea Road is a major collector road and is able to accommodate large amounts of traffic. At the current time the land use is compatible with the area, but the City is also working on an interchange land study. Grittman explained that the plan is looking at the intersection of County Road 39 and I-94, which could have implications for development of the Bowers/Chadwick's parcels. Staff believes that the industrial designation would be compatible, but a possible interchange at County Road 39 and I-94 could cause commercial development pressure directly at the interchange location. Staff noted concerns with outdoor storage that would be visible from the freeway that would be allowed under the I-1 District zoning request. Staff therefore recommended rezoning the parcels to IBC (Industrial and Business Campus) District. Grittman noted that the setbacks and uses were similar with the two industrial districts, but outdoor storage would be restricted and site and building design requirements also vary between the two. City staff felt that a visual transition from the freeway to the west and south industrial would be complimentary by having the parcels rezoned to IBC, as the City's industrial park has in place covenants which restrict outdoor storage and require a higher design 2 standard. Staff recommended re -guiding the parcels from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Work" and rezoning to IBC. Brad Fyle asked if the property abuts the freeway right-of-way line. Grittman confirmed and stated there was not a designated easement along the freeway other than the standard drainage and utility easement. Charlotte Gabler commented that she believed either industrial zoning designation would match the area. Marc Simpson asked if the main difference between the IBC and the I-1 District was outdoor storage. Grittman confirmed, stating additional requirements would also apply for building materials and site plan. He also mentioned that the IBC allows a few business related uses such as office and hospitality uses. Sam Murdoff asked if there was an idea of when a possible interchange would be constructed. Grittman stated that until work has been completed on Highway 25 planning, the work on west interchange planning has been put on hold. Marc Simpson asked what the red dotted line around the parcels meant. Grittman stated that the parcels were located in the Special Use Overlay District. Fyle opened the public hearing and invited the applicant to speak first. Wayne Elam, Commercial Realty Solutions, explained that each parcel is 19 acres. He provided history of the reason for the request and stated that he sat in on an EDA Meeting, where Jim Thares noted the City was running short on industrial land. There were requests out there from industrial developers looking for 5 to 20 acres of land and with current industrial needs could not be met with Otter Creek. Following the meeting, Elam met with John Chadwick and Jim Bowers to discuss the City's need for more industrial land. Elam recommended that they request rezoning from business to industrial. Elam echoed concerns industrial developers have with the shape of the lots in Otter Creek Industrial Park and said that rectangle shaped lots were most cost effective for industrial development. Elam stated the City has 317 acres of commercially zoned land with 80 acres of commercial land on the interstate. He expected the commercial development to occur mostly south of Highway 25 or near Mills Fleet Farm. Elam also indicated that they are requesting I-1 and noted some of the differences with the I-1 and IBC Districts. He stated that he didn't feel this location would be good for a hotel. He expressed concerns with precluding outdoor storage. He reiterated the importance of the I-1 designation and offered a better screening requirement as a tradeoff. John Chadwick, 4477 Manitou Lane, Excelsior, explained the history of the parcels. Chadwick mentioned the benefits of the rezoning that would occur with industrial development especially because of the location of the lift -station. Chadwick expressed that the IBC was not consistent in the area, and that I-1 is located adjacent to the property. Gabler stated the City and IEDC are working on increasing the size of the industrial park or land availability. Wayne Elam stated there is currently IBC land located in the City, with 13 vacant, acres east of the Monticello Workforce Center and 7.5 acres in between Mills Fleet Farm and UMC. He noted that there has not been any development on IBC land. Angela Schumann responded that when the City recodified the Zoning Ordinance, the previously distinguished I -A District was removed, while the IBC was added. Land that was designated I -A was either zoned to IBC or I-1. Schumann confirmed that there has been no construction on the IBC districts. Brad Fyle commented that he didn't want to recommend approval of a rezoning if the owner didn't want it rezoned. Elam stated that he was speaking on behalf of the owners and that they wanted to rezone away from commercial to industrial, either IBC or I-1. Elam reiterated the importance of rezoning to I-1. Gabler asked if a future applicant could apply for a PUD for the parcels and request outdoor storage. Schumann confirmed and added that under the I-1, outdoor storage could be as large as the principal building. She noted that staff are currently working on a revised set of standards for screening and outdoor storage that would come forward at a future meeting. Schumann stated that staff recommend staying with the IBC District because of the restrictions on outdoor storage due to the visbilityof the double fronting lots. Fyle expressed he was leaning towards rezoning to IBC because of visibility. Elam added that with the changes that were soon to be proposed for outdoor storage and screening, he suggested increasing the height of screening. Murdoff asked for examples of outdoor storage that could be seen in this area. Grittinan responded that it depended on the development. Lucas Wynne stated that the decision is based on the desire for how Monticello wants to present itself in the future. Wynne expressed desire for a stricter set of zoning standards due to visibility, but also had concerns with restricting the type of industrial development. Elam noted that if the City rezoned the area to IBC that they also needed to look where they would put additional I-1. 11 Murdoff agreed that there was a need for I-1 with outdoor storage, but wasn't sure if those parcels were the right area. He expressed that a rezoning could possibly be a disservice as there currently is no development plans for the area. Schumann noted that the City is very aware of the need for industrial land. She expressed that the City has a Comprehensive Plan which guides areas for places to work. Schumann than talked about outdoor storage, stating that it didn't have to do strictly with the site appearance, but rather the amount of jobs, wages, and tax base. She noted the importance of balancing outdoor storage with increasing jobs and tax base. MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION PC -2017 - 008 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO "PLACES TO WORK", AND ORDINANCE NO. 6XX FOR REZONING FROM B-4 (REGIONAL BUSINESS) DISTRICT TO IBC (INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS CAMPUS) DISTRICT AS PROPOSED BY CITY STAFF. BRAD FYLE SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0. Schumann stated that the recommendation would be subject to a super -majority vote by the City Council on May 22nd. 3. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of the Communitv Develonnlent Directors Report Angela Schumann thanked Council Member Gabler for being on top of things at the legislature. Schumann noted the League of MN Cities resource information on legislature items such as interim ordinances was provided in the packet. Schumann also noted that on Thursday, May 4th the Small Area Study Steering Committee would be meeting. She expected that a plan would come before the commission in a June or July meeting. There would be a public open house at West Bridge Park. Information about educational sessions was also provided. 4. Added Items Marc Simpson asked Schumann if the Planning Commission could move to electronic agendas. Schumann responded saying that the City Council was trying them out first. She believed that the City Clerk stated within the next few years that the EDA and Planning Commission would also transfer over. 5. Adjournment MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 7:07 P.M. SAM MURDOFF SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0. Recorder: Jacob Thunander T7 Approved: May 2, 2017 5 Attest: Angela Scl� Development Director Bowers, Jim/Chadwick, John - Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning Outlot C & D, Otter Creek Crossing 1155-171-000030& 155-171-000040 1 Lengthy Legals Created by: City of Monticello Ahl AO► COMMERCIAL REALTY SOLUTIONS ww:.,.commrealiysolutions.com April 3, 2017 1 �CIEUVE D AP j 1017 RE: Zoning Change Application and Comprehensive Plan Amendment from B-4 to I-1. Properties: John Chadwick Farms, LLC XXXX Chelsea Road West, Monticello Otter Creek Crossing, 19.08 acres, Outlot D PID: 155-171-000040 JX Bowers, LLC XXXX Chelsea Road West, Monticello Otter Creek Crossing, 19.09 acres, Outlot C PID #155-171-000030 This is a joint application. Reason for Request: This property is between the City owned Otter Creek Industrial Park and I-94. There is a need for large acreage industrial parcels. This property is a logical solution for adding additional industrial land without incurring large infrastructure development costs. There is in excess of 300 acres of available property within the City of Monticello that is zoned Commercial, of which approximately 80 acres of that land is located on the interstate. It is a better use of the property for both the City and the Owners to rezone it to I-1 Industrial. 2 �' � f..� � :a�F� - ,�. �.•�t�, '�_"8t . _ � .. � ;I,(�,• •;fit .i. �"" . f. � _ ar: ,�+La„ .ta {..'' t - � " *.Y •i���;. � � fir{ - 1 �w'4+„ � A?��' }II�"a# V'�--ter .,. f , �,4' �; ,�' 7{ L JM.�- �' '` 'T�`M _.. "3•#ct��, � It I .' -. ".� � f � +� d ;�. �3•'�1,� �_ .� � ��4tVNES.:,�,�A.S 4„ +�• r�i�.�s� -- j �j LY Ln r 4 S fv. •,/��/• �w�y,� �f• •% rY ��•f } •..�A'' �� �•� � .rain ! .�� ( Y♦ I J_ _- •��r� ILwAY• •n NO�, �' 1G' � 1 ! �. �1.. ��� `j'. f _ • ►• �'}' � r . rL�fl {r 4� ��f(q,- '•"4 LO Ck EST � I • p `��p- '� : �a�c ,� �-,�'�e�a.,,`�`�rr` �" �• �� r..�r, l "�•1 � s � �``�'����•-,df � �,,+� ia+..rr ,ut�, �.�� y ��� 'r �, '�', � • I .ter-..' �•i/ ♦ i {j4`r'�f'i F A -C' Ln - - ts,. _ • . ,JJ f ��•^- z ; -'- / �► 1,� � .rte,.... `� • �`'' `` �� �• �. ": 'I {Y�,J Y moi. p�wt �•. -�� j'5����/ I .• w � y.. 3 _In. F T' � � ,yam ,� • � j 0 V, 1A p .i 1 p t LL 13 I • .. Via. -�._. � _� "' � •r �!W_C�F1.Y-�N�1R� Y.s:.l �_ '` \�:;t �+��'�� YR I1 V'JL'� Y �! Q � ( V FA ILA Birch Lake ° a North 106 e E' Lake 0 Cc 0 0.25 0.5 1 s Miles ► ° a Data Source: MnDNR, Sherburne County, Wright County, and WSB & Associates. June 9, 2014 Amended by City Council Resolution 2014-062, June 9, 2014 Legend Places to Live Lake Qr) + Places to Shop i Places to Work Places to Recreate - L 'p + Places for Community ?r Lake�) + Downtown Mixed Use o Interchange Planning Area a Urban Reserve Infrastructure 0 0� ^- Rivers and Streams iPublic Waters Inventory Wetlands (National & Public Waters Inventories) D root Potential Greenway Q J Potential Interchange ° Future Bridge *%a* Existing Arterial or Collector Road 1 'j*,* Proposed Arterial or Collector Road ^�� Powerline Monticello City Boundary Orderly Annexation Area c "' I I NE � 1�, o Land Use Plan Facilitating Redevelopment The Comprehensive Plan seeks to create a place where land use plans, policies, and controls work together with private investment to properly maintain all properties in Monticello. It is recognized that this approach may not succeed in all locations. Despite the best plans and intentions, properties may become physically deteriorated and/or economically inviable. In such places, city intervention may be need to facilitate redevelopment and prevent the spread of blight. This intervention may include: ► Acquisition of land. ► Preparation of sites for development. ► Construction or reconstruction of public improvements. ► Provision of adequate parking supply. ► Remediation of polluted land as needed. ► Removal of other physical and economic barriers to achieve community objectives. These actions may require the use of tax increment financing, tax abatement, or other finance tools available to the City. Development Strategies The following strategies will be used to implement the Comprehensive Plan in the area of Economic Development: 1. The City must use the Comprehensive Plan to provide adequate locations for future job - producing development (Places to Work). 2. The City should adhere to the Comprehensive Plan to encourage stable business setting and promote investment and expansion of facilities. 3. The City should coordinate utility planning and manage other development to ensure that expansion areas are capable of supporting new development in a timely manner. 4. The City will continue to work with existing businesses to maintain an excellent business environment, retain jobs, and facilitate expansions. 5. In addition to assisting business seeking to locate in Monticello, the City should actively target and market to businesses which will be a supplier, customer or collaborative partner to existing businesses within the community. 6. The City should target and market to businesses which would benefit from Monticello's utility and communications infrastructure. 7. The City will work with the CentraCare Health System to ensure the retention and to promote the expansion of health care services in Monticello. 8. The City will use the Comprehensive Plan to maintain and enhance the quality of life in Monticello as a tool for attracting businesses and jobs. 2008 Comprehensive Plan - Updated 2013 Economic Development 1 4-7 Ideally, the Comprehensive Plan does not have an Economic Development chapter. The Land Use Plan would be sufficient to channel market forces to meet the development objectives of the community. In reality, certain development needs cannot be met without public intervention. The Economic Development chapter of the Plan focuses on the aspects of Monticello's future that require particular attention and action by the City. These actions include: ► Attracting and retaining jobs ► Expanding the tax base ► Enhancing the economic vitality of Downtown ► Facilitating redevelopment Attracting and Retaining Jobs The creation and retention of jobs is one of the most important objectives for Monticello. Jobs, particularly jobs with income levels capable of supporting a family, are key to achieving many elements of Monticello's vision for the future. ► Jobs attract residents to the community. Jobs will pay a critical role in creating the type of "move up" housing sought by the City. ► Jobs provide the income needed to support local business and government services. ► Retention of businesses promote community stability by keeping jobs and residents in Monticello. The Community Context chapter of the Comprehensive Plan contains a section on Employment. This section contains data about employment in Monticello and of its residents. Among the key findings in this section are: ► While the community added nearly 5,000 people between 2000 and 2010 according to the U.S. Census, it only added 1,430 jobs according to the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW). In 2010, the community had 6,992 jobs according to the QCEW but 7,093 people in the labor force according to the Census. 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2013 Economic Development 1 4-1 ► The U.S. Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies' OntheMap website shows that in 2010 4,597 people leave the community each day to work, while 3,849 people come into the community to work. Only 835 both live and work in the community. ► Approximately 15% of residents in 2010 are employed within the community. This has dropped from 18% in 2002. ► As shown in Figure 4.1, 2012 data from the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) on their mnprospector.com website shows that Monticello is made up of a wide range of small to medium sized employers. Only 10 employers have more than 100 employees. Over half have fewer than four (4) employees. ► Workers for Monticello businesses come primarily from Monticello and the surrounding region. Nearly 75% of people working in Monticello live in Monticello, adjacent townships, or other places in Wright and Sherburne counties (2010 OntheMap). ► Nearly 40% of Monticello residents work in Hennepin County, with the largest percentage in Minneapolis, Plymouth, and Maple Grove. Another 15% work elsewhere in Wright County, including Buffalo and St. Michael. ► The 2007-2011 American Community Survey (ACS) Census reported a mean travel time to work of 28.5 minutes. This is up from the 2000 Census travel time of 24 minutes. The mean travel time in the 2007-2011 ACS was 29.7 minutes for Wright County and 24.5 minutes for the region overall. Figure 4-1:2012 Total Establishments by Size 1-4 Employees 254 52.05 5-9 Employees 97 19.88 10-19 Employees 64 13.11 20-49 Employees 42 8.61 50-99 Employees 21 4.30 100-249 Employees 7 1.43 250-499 Employees 2 0.41 500-999 Employees 1 0.20 Background Reports The City of Monticello conducts studies and assessments as needed to help guide its economic development efforts. The findings and recommendations of these studies are summarized below with the most recent provided first. 2010 Business Retention and Expansion Research (BR&E) Report Monticello's Business Retention and Expansion (BR&E) program was initiated by the City of Monticello, the Monticello Chamber of Commerce and Industry, DEED, and the University of Minnesota Extension. It was also sponsored by over a dozen local businesses. Through the BR&E program, 60 businesses were visited. Findings from the visits and data analysis found: ► 78% of the visited businesses were locally owned and operated. ► 20% of businesses were in manufacturing, 18% in retail trade, and 13% in other services. ► The businesses employed over 1,600 full-time and 975 part-time employees, with a trimmed average (an average where the low and high were discarded to prevent skewing) of 15.38 full-time employees, slightly down from 15.52 three years ago. The firms also had a trimmed average of 7.76 part-time employees, up from 6.96 three years ago. ► Most full-time employees are in manufacturing, food and beverage, retail trade, and medical, while part-time employees are in medical, retail trade, and tourism/recreational services. ► Survey results indicated that the medical industry is the highest employer in Monticello, followed by retail trade and manufacturing. ► Businesses in the community are fairly stable with about half expecting some type of change. The BR&E identified four strategies aimed at helping businesses become more profitable. Each strategy was accompanied by a list of potential projects intended to be ideas for the community to explore. The implementation of the projects is intended to be a collaborative effort among the various sectors of the community. The four strategies identified included: 4-2 1 Economic Development City of Monticello ► Improve Business Retention and Expansion Through Technical and Development Assistance. ► Improve Labor Force Availability and Productivity. ► Improve Infrastructure to Help Move Goods, Customers, and the Labor Force More Efficiently. ► Improve and Promote the Quality of Life in Monticello. During the 2013 comprehensive plan economic development update process, it was noted that the 2010 Business Retention and Expansion Research strategies were similar to the 2008 Development Strategies. The review process identified the need to continue similar strategies into the future. Preceding the development of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan an assessment was conducted by St. Cloud State University to determine whether a bioscience park should be established in Monticello. At that time the bioscience industry was an economic development focus statewide. While the attraction of a bioscience business is not a particular focus of Monticello today, there are findings of that study that can be useful to consider in the overall development of economic development strategies for the community. Some of the Monticello's strengths for attracting businesses included: ► Land availability (compared to Metro Area). ► Access to major highways (I-94, U.S. 10 and STH 25). ► Regional growth of employment base. ► Development of local fiber optic system. ► Proximity to universities. ► Overall location. ► Expansive park system. ► Monticello Community Center. Recommended business development activities that apply to the attraction and retention of all businesses include ensuring that there are sites suitable and attractive to potential businesses available and ready for development. The community should continue to explore and establish partnerships with a variety of stakeholders that can work together to support business attraction and retention. This includes the identification of funding sources which may be an incentive for businesses locating in Monticello. When available the City should participate in special tax zones that have been made available at the state and federal level to support business development and retention. Expanding the Tax Base A traditional objective of local economic development planning is the expansion of the property tax base. Under the current system of local government finance, property taxes are the largest source of city revenue. For this reason, it is an important aspect of economic development planning in Monticello. Understanding the Property Tax System Effective strategies to promote the growth of the tax base require a clear understanding of the property tax system. Property Valuation There are three forms of property valuation. The foundation of the property tax system is Estimated Market Value. This amount is the value of a parcel of property as set by the County Assessor. In some circumstances, the State Legislature limits the amount of Estimated Market Value that can be used for taxation. These adjustments result in the Taxable Market Value. The value used to calculate property taxes is Tax Capacity. Tax Capacity Value is a percentage of Taxable Market Value. The percentage factors are set by the State Legislature and vary by class of property. Changes in the Tax System Traditional economic development theory seeks commercial and industrial development as a means of building tax base. Historically, the system supported this approach. A dollar of estimated market value of commercial -industrial property carried a higher tax capacity value than residential property. Over the past twelve years, tax "reforms" by the State Legislature have changed this situation. 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2013 Economic Development 1 4-3 CITY OF monff(do Destination Innovation PID Owner Size (Acres) 2013 Taxes Zoning .1. ........1.55.-.171...-.000030 ..............................7. X..Bowers. LLC ...................................................................................19.09..........................................$84.1.00....................................B.-4................ 2.........155.-.171-,000040 ...............................John..Chadwi ck..Farms.LLC............................................... 1.9.09. ......................................... $8.78,00.. .................................. B.-4................ 3.........1.55.-.125-.000040 .............................. Ocello..LLC...................................................................................................1...1.,8.5..........................................$6.,452.00 ............................... .B.-3................ 4.........1.55. -.125-.0......411.0 .............................. Wells. Fargo. Bank.NA................................................................6,28.............................................$6.,042.00...............................B-3................. 5.........1.55.-.125-.000070 .............................. Ocello.. LLC.................................................................................................12.96..........................................$7,.055.00...............................B.-3................ 6.........155-500-.142210 .............................. City..of.Monticello...........................................................................4.1.1..............................................$0..00............................................B.-3................ .7...........155.-.151-,003010 .............................. Bradley.&. Sharon.,Larson.....................................................1.78..............................................$2.,950.00...............................B.-4................ s......1.5.5...1.5.7...00.1.0.1.0 ............................Ghana..Prop.exti�s..l~waxy...LP.............................................5.............................................$.G.,..G8.Q..............................B-4. ... ... ... ... 9.........15.5.-.157-.00.102................................ rma..Property.LLC.....................................................................1.67.............................................$9.,.424.0..0............................... B.-4................ 10 ...1.55 171...001021 ...............................4.134 Deegan Av..enue.NE.LLC......................................1.1.6.............................................$6,304.00...............................B-4................ 1.1.....1.55.-.174-.00.1010 .............................. Ghana.. Properties. Family. LP..........................................0.90.............................................$4.,482.00............................... B.-4................ .12.....1.55 151...004010..............................Ohana. Properties Family.LP..........................................0.57.............................................$2>.476,00...............................B-4................ 13.....155.-.193-00,1020 .............................. Highland. Bank................................................................................... 7.02.............................................$7,984.00............................... B.-`1................ 14 ...1.55 164..000030..............................City of Monticello..........................................................................7.20.............................................$0.00...........................................B-4................ 15.....15.5-164-000050 ..............................City.. of Monticello...........................................................................2.1.4.............................................$0.00 ................................................................................... B-4 16.....155-164-000040 ..............................City. of Monticello ...........................................................................6.14.............................................$0.OO............................................B-4................ 17 155 176..002011...............................City ...... ........ of Monticello...........................................................................1.29........................................... ....... ............. ................. ............ .. $0 OO............................................B-4................ ..... 18.....155-.176-00,1020 ..............................City..of Monticello...........................................................................2.70.............................................$0..00............................................B.-4................ 19 ...155-164-000020 ..............................City of Monticello...........................................................................2.83.............................................$0.00...........................................B-4................ 20. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-210-001010 Kleinbank 1.80 $6,160.00 B-3 2.1.....155-221-000010 ..............................Quad Development LLC ......................................................3.80.............................................$6,474.00...............................B-4 .............. 22. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-227-000010 Ocello LLC 43.15 $0.00 B-4 23,.....155.-500-142400 ...............................John & Mary Lundsten...........................................................38.87.........................................$.1,628.00...............................B.-3................. 24. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-213-001010 Glen & Lois Posusta 1.79 $9,800.00 B-3 .... 25.....155-500-142303 .............................. Cityof Monticello...........................................................................3.07.............................................$$0.00............................................B-3 ........................................................................... ............................................. ........................................... . ................ 26.15.5.-500-142300 ..............................City of Monticello 3.20 $0.00 B.-3................ 27. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-500-142104 Premier Bank Minnesota 18.31 $29,934.00 B-4 28.....155-01.8-001020 .............................. Ci..y..of.Monticello...........................................................................5.1.1..............................................$0..00............................................ B.-2................ 29. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-037-001010 Kean of Monticello, Inc 1.92 $4,938.00 B-2 30.....155-050-000020 Joseph Lofromboise Trust .............................................................................................................................................. 3.13 $3 340.00 .......................................................................... IBC 3.1.....155-029-002130 ..............................G&E Properties LLC..................................................................4.1.8..............................................$5,302.00...............................IBC .............. 32.....155-029-002120 ..............................G&E Properties LLC..................................................................2,03..............................................$2.:.940.00...............................IBC............... 33 ...155 029..002110..............................G&E. Properties LLC..................................................................2.1.1..............................................$3>.054.00..............................IBC............... 34.....155-029-,002,100 ..............................G&E Properties..LLC..................................................................2.20.............................................$3.,.186.00...............................IBC............... 35 l..5..5. -.0.2..9..-.0.0.2.0.9..O .............................G&.E Properties LLC 2.28............................................$3,300.00..............................IBC............... 36. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-029-002050 Kenneth Maus 5.40 .$ ,230.00 IBC 37.....155-068-00.1010 .............................. Riverwood. Bank...............................................................................19.35..........................................$30,286.00........................... B.-3................. 38. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-185-001010 State of Minnesota 1.58 $0.00 B-3 39.....155-202-,00,1060 ..............................IRET.Properties.................................................................................0,51..............................................$0..00............................................ B.-3................. 40.....15.5.-079-00101.0 ..............................Tyoti RPatel..............................................................................................0.79.............................................$0.00............................................B.-3................. 41. ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 155-011-000171 Monticello Industrial Park 40.83 $0.00 B2/IBC. 42.....155-212-001010 ..............................Ryan Companies US INC....................................................1.54.............................................$0.00............................................B.-4................ 43 ...1.55 212..001030 ............................ Kean of.Monticello, Inc.......................................................1.09.............................................$0 OO............................................B-4................ 44.....155-178-002030 ..............................Ryan Companies US INC ....................................................1.27.............................................$0.OO............................................B.-4................ 45 ...155 205..001020 .............. Ryan Companies US INC ................................................................1,87.............................................$0 OO...........................................B-4................ 46.....1.5.5-117-002010 ..............................MMC Land Company LLC..............................................5.04.............................................$0.00............................................B.-4................ 47 155 117-001030 MMC Company LLC... 2.24 ........ $0 00 B-4 .............. 48.....1.55.-086-000010 .............................. SPO.. LLC.......................................................................................................0.95.............................................$0..00............................................ B.-2................ 49.....1.5.5.-.196-.000020 ..............................Monticello.. Industrial. Park, ..Inc ...................................1.4 .............................................. $263.00 ..................................... -PUD..._ JKMonticello Destination for Innovation Updated: 4/2016 CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS Section 3.6 Industrial Base Zoning Districts Subsection (C) Industrial and Business Campus District Section 3.6 (C) IBCIndustrial and Business Campus District The purpose of the "IBC" industrial business campus district is to provide for the establishment of limited light industrial business offices, limited light manufacturing, wholesale showrooms and related uses in an environment which provides a high level of amenities, including landscaping, preservation of natural features, architectural controls, and other features. Base Lot Area • Minimum = 8,000 sq ft. Base Lot Width • Minimum= 100 ft. Typical IBC Lot Configuration Typical IBC Building Types City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 123 CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS Section 3.6 Industrial Base Zoning Districts Subsection (C) Industrial and Business Campus District REQUIRED YARDS (in feet) [I] Max Height (stories Max Floor Area Max Impervious (% Front Interior Street Rear / feet) Ratio (FAR) of gross lot area) Side Side 2 stories All Uses 50 30 50 40 30 feet (Reserved) (Reserved) [2] [ 1 ]: When any yard abuts a zoning district other than I -I or 1-2, the setbacks for the abutting yard must be 50 feet. [2]: Multi -story buildings may be allowed as a conditional use pursuant to Section 2.4(D)contingent upon strict adherence to fire safety code provisions as specified by the International Building Code as adopted in Title 4. Chapter I of the Monticello City Code. Accessory Structures See Section 5.3(B) for all general standards and limitations on accessory structures. Additional In the IBC district, every effort shall be made to preserve natural ponding areas and features of the land Regulations to create passive open space. ■ Section 3.3. Common District Reauirements Other Section 3.60. Standards ADDlicable to All Industrial Base Zoning Districts Regulations Section 4.1. LandscaDinQ_ and Screening_ Standards to Consult Section 4.5. Signs (not all inclusive) Section 4.8. Off -Street Parking Section 4.9. Off -Street Loading ■ Section 4.11. Buildine Materials is Lots must be a minimum ioo feet wide and more than 8000 square feet in total size z: Front yard and side street setbacks of 50 feet are required 3: High amenities and natural features are to highlight development in the IBC district 4: Maximum structure height of 30 feet unless otherwise authorized by conditional use permit Z . 3 5.30 foot interior side yard setbacks required r9o' Max Ht 6. Landscaped parking islands required every 24 spaces in the IBC district 7. Parking areas set back a minimum of 6 feet from property lines #f jr �� �• lhdal'strj71 Page 124 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Section 3.6 (D) 1.1 Light Industrial District The purpose of the "I-1," light industrial, district is to provide for the establishment of warehousing and light industrial development. Base Lot Area • Minimum = 20,000 square feet Base Lot Width • Minimum= 100 feet Typical 1-1 Lot Configuration CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS Section 3.6 Industrial Base Zoning Districts Subsection (D) 1-I: Light Industrial District Typical 1-1 Building Types City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 125 CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS Section 3.6 Industrial Base Zoning Districts Subsection (D) I -I: Light Industrial District REQUIRED YARDS (in feet) [1] Max Height (stories Max Floor Area Max Impervious (% Front Interior Street Rear / feet) Ratio (FAR) of gross lot area) Side Side All Uses 30 15 30 15 2 stories (Reserved) (Reserved) 30 feet [2] [ I ]: When any yard abuts a zoning district other than I -I or 1-2, the setbacks for the abutting yard must be 50 feet. [2]: Multi -story buildings may be allowed as a conditional use pursuant to Section 2.40) contingent upon strict adherence to fire safety code provisions as specified by the International Building Code as adopted in Title 4. Chapter I of the Monticello City Code. Accessory Structures See Section 5.3(B) for all general standards and limitations on accessory structures. ■ Section 3.3. Common District Requirements Other Section 3.60. Standards ADDlicable to All Industrial Base Zoning Districts Regulations • Section 4.1. LandscaDlne and Screening_ Standards to Consult Section 4.5. Signs (not all Section 4.8. Off -Street Parking inclusive) Section 4.9. Off -Street Loading ■ Section 4.11. Building Materials is Minimum street side yard setback of 30 feet. 2: Minimum front yard setback of 3: Minimum lot width of ioo 4et 4: Light manufacturing plant as a permitted use 5: Interior side yard setbacks cf 15 feet 6: Minimum lot size of 2o,000 square feet 7: Rear yard setback of 15 feet, -20.000 SF MINIMUM Page 126 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section 5.1 Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure Residential Uses 5.2(C)(1) Attached Dwelling Types 5.2(C)(21(a) - Duplex p C 5.2(C)(2)(b) - Townhouse C p M 5.2(C)(2)(c) - Multiple -Family C P C C 5.2(C)(2)(d) Detached Dwelling p p p p p p None Group Residential P P P P P 5.2(C)(3) Facility, Single Family Group Residential C C C 5.2(C)(3) Facility, Multi -Family Mobile & Manufactured C C C P C 5.2(C)(4) Home / Home Park Civic & Institutional Uses Active Park Facilities P P P P P P P PP P P p p p p None (public) Active Park Facilities P P P P P P P 5.2(D)(I) (private) Assisted Living Facilities C p C I 5.2(D)(2) Cemeteries C C C C C C C C P P C 5.2(D)(3-)! None Clinics/Medical Services Essential Services P P P P P P P P None P P P P P P P Hospitals C PIN P C 5.2(D)-(4-) Nursing/Convalescent C C C C C C C C C PP 5.2(D)(5) Home Passenger Terminal C C C C None Passive Parks and Open P P P P P P P P P P P P p p p None Space Place of Public Assembly C C C C C p C 5.2(D)(6) Public Buildings or Uses C C C C C C C P C C P P C P P 5.2(D)(7) Schools, K-12 C C C C C C I I 5.2(D)(8) Schools, Higher1 None EducationF C Utilities (major) C C C 5.2(D)(9) Office Uses Offices ■ �� P P C P P P P 5.2(E1 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 319 CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.1 Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure Commercial Uses Adult Uses Auction House Auto Repair — Minor Automotive Wash Facilities Bed & Breakfasts Boarding House Brew Pub Business Support Services Commercial Lodging Communications/Broadcasting Convenience Retail Country Club Day Care Centers Entertainment/Recreation, Indoor Commercial Entertainment/Recreation, Outdoor Commercial Financial Institution Funeral Services Kennels (commercial) Landscaping/ Nursery Business Personal Services Production Brewery or Micro -Distillery without Taproom Production Brewery or Micro -Distillery with Taproom or Cocktail Room Recreational Vehicle Camp Site Repair Establishment Restaurants Retail Commercial Uses (other) Specialty Eating Establishments C C P C ����� C C• C P C• CICI IP I P P C C P C P PI IP CI PI PIP CIC CP P C P P P P P C I P P P PP C PIP P OP P P I P C I a 3.7(K1 5.2(F)(2) 5.2(F)(3) 5.2(F)(4) 5.2(F)(5) 5.2(F)(6) 5.2(F)(7) None 5.2(F)(8) 5.2(F)(9) 5.2(F)(1 O) 5.2(F)(II) 5.20 (12) 5.2(F)(I 3 5.2(F)(14) 5.2(F)(I 5) 5.2(F)(I 6) 5.2(F)(I 7 5.2(F)(I 8 5.2(F)(22) 5.2(G)(I 01 5.2(F)(24) 5.2(G)(I 11) 5.2(F)(25) 5.2(F)(26) 5.2(F)(27) 5.2(F)(28) 5.2(F)(29) Page 320 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section 5.1 Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure Vehicle fuel Sales C C CI 1� 5.2(F)(30) Vehicle Sales and Rental C 5.2(F)(31) Veterinary Facilities C 5.2(F)(32) (Rural) Veterinary Facilities C C C 5.20(32) (Neighborhood) Wholesale Sales P P P None Industrial Uses Auto Repair — Major C �P P 5.2(G)(I) Bulk Fuel Sales and P P 5.2(G)(2) Storage Contractor's Yard, Temporary 5.2(G 3 Extraction of Materials I I I 5.2(G)(4) General Warehousing C C P P 5.2(G)(5) Heavy Manufacturing C 5.2(G)(6) Industrial Services C P None Land Reclamation C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 5.2(G)(7) Light Manufacturing P P P 5.2(6)(8) Machinery/Truck Repair P P 5.2(G)(9) & Sales Recycling and Salvage C C 5.2(G)( 10) Center Self -Storage Facilities P C P 5.2(G)( I1) Truck or Freight C P P 5.2 G I2 Terminal Waste Disposal & IC 5.2(�(13) Incineration Wrecker Services C P 5.20(14) Commercial Day Care Commercial Lodging C P C C C P C none none 5.2(F)( 12 5.2(F)(8) City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 321 CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section S. I Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure Commercial Recreation: Outdoor Convenience Retail Funeral Services Medical / Clinical Services Personal Services Places of Public Assembly Production Brewery or Micro - Distillery with Taproom or Cocktail Room Professional Office -Services Including Financial Institutions Restaurants, Bars < 10,000 SF Restaurants, Bars > 10,000 SF Retail Sales < 10,000 SF Retail Sales > 10,000 SF Retail with Service Specialty Eating Establishments < 10,000 SF Vehicle Fuel Sales Veterinary Facilities Residential — Upper Floors Residential — Street Level Residential — Multiple Family Residential — Townhouse Residential — Single Family Industrial PUD Public Buildings or Uses C C none C P* C C *F-2 Drive Through by CUP — C C = none L-2: NA first floor, C P P P CUP upper floors P P P P L-3: CUP C C C C none C C C C P P P C P P C C P C C P P C C P C C P C C P* P* C* P* C C C* C P C C none L-2: NA first floor, CUP upper floors none none none none L-2: NA first floor, CUP upper floors *Drive Through by CUP L-8 only none P P P P L-2: NA WrC C L-2: NA C C L-2: NA C none C none L-3: PUD Only C I C I C I P I none 5.2(F)(14) 5.2U(! 0) 5.2U(! 6) 5.2U(! 9) 5.20(22) 5.2(F)(23) 5.2(F)(24) 5.2 F 15 5.2(F)(2 1) 5.20 (27) 5.20 (27) 5.2(F)(28) 5.20(28) 5.20(28) 5.20(29) 5.20(30) 5.20(32) Page 322 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Interchange Map Option #1 Legend Proposed Land Uses 0 Commercial W Industrial Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential Gross Land Use Acres: Single Family Residential 1,499 Ac. Medium Density Residential 223 Ac. Commercial 248 Ac. Industrial 116 Ac. Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW, but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed): Single Family Residential 1040 Ac. Medium Density Residential 146 Ac. Commercial 193 Ac. Industrial 103 Ac. Existing Land Uses Commercial Industrial OInterchange Area /��� Parks and Open Space r-------- i City Boundary -----■ Proposed Roads Existing Roads CConcept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor) Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands) Parcels N 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. Or/ 4150 Olson Memorial Highway, Ste. 320, Golden Valle V. MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacplanning.com Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County February 8, 2016 120TH Birch Unnamed a m 100TH Ud La. g Bertram Lake / 1 / m 0 0 0 0 170TH r -- r E Interchange Map Option #2 Legend Proposed Land Uses 0 Commercial W Industrial Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential Gross Land Use Acres: Single Family Residential 940 Ac. Medium Density Residential 123 Ac. Commercial 123 Ac. Industrial 184 Ac. Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW, but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed): Single Family Residential 769 Ac. Medium Density Residential 115 Ac. Commercial 44 Ac. Industrial 155 Ac. Existing Land Uses Commercial O Interchange Area Industrial Parks and Open Space i --------i City Boundary -----■ Proposed Roads Existing Roads Concept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor) Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands) Parcels N 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4150 Olson Memorial HighwaV, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.110^ Website: www.nacplanning.com Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County 120TH Unnamed Birch 1 1 _. -� i o First Lake 1 100TH /Mud Lake 99TH ; Lake z Bertram Lake � �/ / 9 I 3 u z Interchange Map Option #3 Legend Proposed Land Uses 0 Commercial W Industrial Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential Gross Land Use Acres: Single Family Residential 1,235 Ac. Medium Density Residential 140 Ac. Commercial 405 Ac. Industrial 466 Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW, but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed): Single Family Residential 941 Ac. Medium Density Residential 127 Ac. Commercial 249 Ac. Industrial 303 Existing Land Uses Commercial Industrial Parks and Open Space r-------- i City Boundary -■ Proposed Roads Existing Roads OInterchange Area Concept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor) Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands) Parcels N 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4150 Olson Memorial Hiqhway, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN S5422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacplanning.com Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County February 8, 2016 Interchange Map Option #4 No Build Legend Proposed Land Uses 1w— Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential Gross Land Use Acres: Single Family Residential 1,172 Ac. Medium Density Residential 123 Ac. Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW, but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed): Single Family Residential 919 Ac. Medium Density Residential 73 Ac. Existing Land Uses Commercial Industrial Parks and Open Space r-------- i City Boundary ------ Proposed Roads Existing Roads Concept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor) Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands) Parcels N 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4150 Olson MemonaI Highway, Ste. 320, 'en valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacl)lanning.com Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County March 1, 2016 Legend I — — I ICit of Monticello I i Off ici I Zoning M P � � I \ 1 I \ \ I \ \ I \� I \ I \ \ I \ o I \\ 3 \ � I \ \ I � I I ---------— c --- ----_ I — — — — — — — — — — — —I \ Praire Rd Hi W E I \ I � I e�, I BASE ZONING DISTRICTS d Residential DistrictsBusiness Districts i -- Low Residential Densities- \ (k Kama w3 d i i AO R -A R-1 -- Medium Residential Densities T -N R-2 C R -PUD -- High Residential Densities 8-2 8-3 . 8-4 CCD Industrial Districts ] pec 1-1 R-3 ----------, 01 Swan River --------- ; Monticello M -H' PUDs L-------- High School OTHER Water OVERLAY DISTRICTS ----------1 03 il Mills Fleet Farm ----------1 04 1 Red Rooster Performance Based Overlay District Special Use Overlay District Mississippi Wild, Scenic & Rec Overlay District Shoreland District I Freeway Bonus Sign District • • \\��� ` I � c Sys ; h ., � � — \ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — jfJ/yI►.J[ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — i I[IIiijm MAN ►■ �■ IIIII �C U � !i ■S = 1111■ ■ 11111111 } -------- City Council Agenda — 6/12/17 ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan Amendment. As noted above, the applicants are seeking an amendment to the "Land Use Plan Map" which can be found in the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, a Comprehensive Plan amendment is necessary. I-94 Interchanze Studv. In 2016, the City undertook a land use analysis as a part of the ongoing I-94 Interchange Study. The study examines the possibility of an interchange at the County Road 39 overpass. This is along the northern boundary of the northwest parcel. It should be noted that the study suggests this area should be zoned commercial if an interchange is constructed. However, as noted in the applicant's narrative, the City already has an abundance of vacant commercial zoning while industrial options are limited. In addition, the interchange study did not contemplate in depth the re -guiding of existing land uses within City boundaries. In support of the redesignation, the Comprehensive Plan identifies the northwest side of the City as needing to expand on existing "Places to Work". The Economic Development portion of the Plan promotes emphasis on this land use category, and the land use plan supports additional industrial growth in the northwest region. As noted above, the I-94 Interchange Study supports these strategies by identifying industrial land uses as a component of the land use mix for the area. While the "Places to Work" category is an important element in the City's growth and development, the Comprehensive Plan's Economic Development chapter focuses on tax base and job creation as the most important factors in seeking new industrial growth. At the same time, City staff reports an increase in industrial development interest that includes a component of outdoor storage. Outdoor storage, while it supports the principal business activity, does not create tax base or employment. Finding a balance point to promote industrial development is an element of the analysis in this case. The Zoning ordinance identifies the following factors for considering proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments: (a) Whether the proposed amendment corrects an error or addresses the need resulting from some changing condition, trend, or fact arising since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan; (b) Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the guiding principles of the Comprehensive Plan; (c) The extent to which the proposed amendment addresses a demonstrated community need; (d) Whether the proposed amendment will protect the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the public; 2 City Council Agenda — 6/12/17 (e) The impacts on the natural and built environments, including air, water, noise, stormwater management, wildlife habitat, water quality, vegetation, drainage, streets, and other engineering design or environmental factors; (f) Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject property; whether the proposed design and land uses are appropriate for the land; and whether the proposed amendment will maintain or improve compatibility among uses and ensure efficient development within the City; (g) Whether the proposed amendment will result in a logical, orderly and predictable development pattern; and (h) Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the purpose of this ordinance. Most of these factors are present in considering the proposed land use plan amendment, including changes in the needs and demands for industrial land. Designating the map for "Places to Work" as requested, and considering a rezoning of the property from B-4 to an industrial designation would support the City's economic development objectives for tax base and job creation. As such, the applicants' request appears to be consistent with the direction and policies of the current expectations of the Comprehensive Plan. It is conceivable that if an interchange is eventually planned at County 39, circumstances may suggest zoning which would allow for more commercial land uses nearest to the interchange location. Zoning. The subject site is zoned B-4 (Regional Business) District. The applicants are seeking to rezone the property to I-1 (Light Industrial) to be consistent with property across Chelsea Rd. W. However, City staff recognizes that the parcels are along I-94 which offers significant exposure to passing traffic, and the area serves as a western gateway to the community. In addition, the parcels also front Chelsea Road, a major collector route for the city. The parcels therefore are considered double -fronting and highly visible from both I-94 and Chelsea Road. In considering the appropriate zoning for the property, it is noted that a change to I-1 would allow for outdoor storage, while a change to IBC would accommodate many of the same light industrial uses, but would limit outdoor storage. IBC allows light industrial, offices, and other business type uses. Also as noted above, the potential issue of a freeway interchange at the County 39 location could impact the long-term 3 City Council Agenda — 6/12/17 land use demands on this site. In this regard, staff has examined to potential for both I-1 and IBC zoning designations for the subject parcels. Industrial District Covenants. In regard to consistency with the parcels across Chelsea Road, within the City -owned industrial park, it is important to note that private covenants apply. The purpose of the covenants was to ensure that the district would be developed with higher standards for buildings, site improvements (such as landscaping), and restrict outdoor storage activities. While these covenants would not apply to the properties subject to the rezoning, it is important to understand how the adjoining lands have developed to now, and are expected to further develop into the future. Thus, while the general designation is for "Places to Work", and the zoning designation is I-1, there is a higher level of development standards applied to that area. Lot Area and Width. The following table shows that the parcels will be conforming with the I-1 District standards as well as the IBC District standards. It should be noted that the table below represents an analysis of the parcels in their current configuration. Any future subdivision of the parcels would require platting, at which time the lot area, widths and setbacks would again be evaluated. Lot Area and Width Rezone to I-1 Light Industrial Parcel Lot Area Required Compliant Lot Required Compliant Business Campus Front 0 feet 30 feet Width Side (Interior) 0 feet Southeast 831,399 ft. 20,000 sq. ft. Yes 1,700 ft. 100 ft. Yes Northwest 831,393 ft. 20,000 sq. ft. Yes 900 ft. 100 ft. Yes Rezone to IBC Industrial Business Campus Parcel Lot Area Required Compliant Lot Required Compliant Width Southeast 831,399 ft. 8,000 sq. ft. Yes 1,700 ft. 100 ft. Yes Northwest 831,393 ft. 8,000 sq. ft. Yes 900 ft. 100 ft. Yes The two subject parcels will be compliant with the City's requirements for lot size and width in the I-1 District as well as the IBC. Setbacks. The following table shows the setback requirements for the B-4, I-1, and IBC districts: Setback Comparison M B-4 Regional I-1 Light Industrial IBC Industrial Business District District Business Campus Front 0 feet 30 feet 50 feet Side (Interior) 0 feet 15 feet 30 feet Side (Street) 0 feet 30 feet 50 feet Rear 0 feet 15 feet 40 feet M City Council Agenda — 6/12/17 From the table above, the properties' current zoning is the least restrictive of the three in terms of setback. The applicant should be aware that any rezoning will result in more restrictive setback requirements. It is noted that the IBC District imposes a greater setback requirement than does the I-1 District. However, the parcels are of adequate size to accommodate development under either district, so setbacks need not factor into the City's decision. Overlav District. The area is within the Freeway Bonus Sign District. This district allows for additional signage along I-94. The rezone would not exempt the parcels from this district. It should be noted that the area is also adjacent to the Special Use Overlay District. The City may wish to consider impacts of these overlay districts on development of the subject property as separate actions. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed the requests and held a public hearing on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning applications on May 2nd, 2017. The Planning Commission heard public comment from one of the applicants and property owner John Chadwick, and his representative Wayne Elam, regarding the request for comprehensive plan amendment and to rezone the subject parcels to I-1. Mr. Elam expressed that the applicants would prefer I-1 zoning designation, as it would provide for the ability to use the property for outdoor storage, versus the IBC recommendation of staff, which would limit that ability. No other public was present to address the Commission on the matter. The Planning Commission discussed the site and potential uses of the property under either the IBC or I-1 zoning designations. After discussion, the Planning Commission recommended to approve the Comprehensive Plan amendment reguiding the site to "Places to Work" and recommended rezoning the site to IBC (Industrial and Business Campus), citing the property's visible location along Chelsea Road and I-94 as a basis for their recommendation, in addition to those findings in the resolution PC -2017-008. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Decision 1: Comprehensive Plan Amendment (requires a supermajority vote of the City Council to approve) The Planning Commission recommends Alternative #1 below. Motion to adopt Resolution 2017 - XX to approve a Comprehensive Plan amendment reguiding the subject parcels to "Places to Work", based on findings in said resolution. 5 City Council Agenda — 6/12/17 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution 2017 - XX to approve a Comprehensive Plan amendment reguiding the subject parcels to "Places to Work", based on findings to be made by the City Council. Motion of other. Decision 2: Rezoning Request The Planning Commission recommends Alternative #1 below. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 6XX for rezoning of the subject parcels from B-4 (Regional Business) District to IBC (Light Industrial Business ) as recommended by staff and based on findings of the Planning Commission per resolution 2017 -PC -008. 2. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 6XX for rezoning of the subject parcels from B-4 (Regional Business) District to I-1 (Light Industrial District) as proposed in the application of April 1, 2017, based on findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution PC- 2017 — 008 for rezoning from B-4 Regional Business District, based on findings to be made by the City Council. 4. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION An amendment of the Comprehensive Plan requires consideration of the general goals and policies of the City for long-term land use, and how the proposed amendment would further those goals. In this case, it is noted that the City has a large inventory of undeveloped commercial property in the Highway 25 corridor, and the Comprehensive Plan recommends the inclusion of more industrial land uses toward the northwest. Commercial uses are better accommodated in concentrations along major accessible corridors, as well as in proximity to freeway interchanges. At the current time, there is not immediate freeway interchange near the subject property, although the City is engaged in a series of studies (currently focusing on Highway 25) to determine the possible location or locations for future interchange locations. As this determination is quite some time into the future, the industrial designation for the area appears to be appropriate. With regard to the specific industrial zoning district, the staff report notes that the high level of exposure to the freeway, as well as the covenant -enforced requirements on the adjoining industrial park to the southwest suggest that the IBC District would n City Council Agenda — 6/12/17 be more appropriate for the site than the I-1. Particularly given the restrictions on outdoor storage and allowance for certain commercial uses, the IBC District would better reflect the future development of the site in question. As such, staff recommends Alternative #1, approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment, and a rezoning to the IBC, Industrial Business Campus District. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution 2017- B. Ordinance No. 6XX C. Resolution PC -2017-008 D. Planning Commission Minutes, May 2nd, 2017 E. Aerial Site Image F. Applicant Narrative G. Excerpt, Monticello Comprehensive Plan: a. Land Use Map b. Economic Development H. Commercial Land Inventory Map I. Industrial Land Inventory Map J. Excerpt, Monticello Zoning Ordinance a. IBC (Industrial Business Campus) b. I-1 (Light Industrial) c. Use Table K. Excerpt, Monticello Interchange Study a. Concept Maps L. Monticello Zoning Map 7 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-29 APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REDESIGNATING FROM "PLACES TO SHOP" TO "PLACES TO WORK" FOR OUTLOTS C & D, OTTER CREEK CROSSING WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to reguide the subject property, identified as Outlot C & D, Otter Creek Crossing and legally described in the attached "Exhibit A", resulting in a change from business-related land uses to industrial -related land uses; and WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to market the property for industrial users; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is consistent with the long-term use and development of the property suggested by the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City has experienced a need for additional industrial land through development inquiries; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 2, 2017 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission, all of the comments of the hearing, and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The land use plan amendment is an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site. 2. The use of the site for industrial development is consistent with the City's economic development objectives. 3. The amendment results in a land use designation that more closely achieves the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan than would the current regulations. 4. The amendment results in the potential for development that would be compatible and consistent with the existing surrounding land uses in the area. 6. The resulting land uses will have impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the subject property as proposed. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA: The Monticello City Council approves the Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan redesignating the subject property as legally described in "Exhibit A" from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Work". ADOPTED BY the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota this 12th day of June, 2017. ATTEST: CITY OF MONTICELLO Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator Brian Stumpf, Mayor EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PARCELS PARCEL 1: That part of Outlot D, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota, lying southeasterly of a line parallel with and distant 1689.64 feet northwesterly of, as measured at right angles to the southeasterly line of said Outlot D. PARCEL 2: Outlot C, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. :►m That part of Outlot D, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota, lying northwesterly of a line parallel with and distant 1689.64 feet northwesterly of, as measured at right angles to the southeasterly line of said Outlot D. ORDINANCE NO. 669 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY FROM B-4, GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT TO IBC, INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS CAMPUS DISTRICT: OUTLOTS C AND D, OTTER CREEK CROSSING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. The zoning map of the City of Monticello is hereby amended to rezone the following described parcels from B-4, Regional Business to IBC, Industrial Business Campus District: PID NUMBERS: 155-171-000030 & 155-171-000040 (See attached Legal Description) Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this day of , 2017. Brian Stumpf, Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 669 ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, Administrator AYES: NAYS: ORDINANCE NO. 669 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PARCELS PARCEL 1: That part of Outlot D, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota, lying southeasterly of a line parallel with and distant 1689.64 feet northwesterly of, as measured at right angles to the southeasterly line of said Outlot D. PARCEL 2: Outlot C, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. AND That part of Outlot D, OTTER CREEK CROSSING, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota, lying northwesterly of a line parallel with and distant 1689.64 feet northwesterly of, as measured at right angles to the southeasterly line of said Outlot D. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-008 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REDESIGNATING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM "PLACES TO SHOP" TO "PLACES TO WORK", AND REZONING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM "B-4", REGIONAL BUSINESS TO "IBC", INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS CAMPUS" WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to reguide and rezone subject property, identified as Outlot C & D, Otter Creek Crossing, resulting in a change from business-related land uses to industrial -related land uses; and WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to market the property for industrial users; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments are consistent with the long-term use and development of the property suggested by the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City has experienced a need for additional industrial land through development inquiries; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 2, 2017 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The land use plan amendment and rezoning are an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site. 2. The use of the site for industrial development is consistent with the City's economic development objectives. 3. The amendments result in a land use designation that more closely achieves the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan than would the current regulations. 4. The amendments result in the potential for development that would be compatible and consistent with the existing surrounding land uses in the area. 6. The resulting land uses will have impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the subject property as proposed. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-008 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, redesignating the subject property from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Work", and adopts Ordinance No. rezoning the subject property from B-4, Regional Business to IBC, Industrial Business Campus. ADOPTED this 2nd day of May, 2017, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION L'In ATTEST: Brad Fyle, Chair Angela Schumann, Community Development Director 2 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, May 2°d, 2017 - 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Special Joint Meeting Mississippi Room - 5:00 PM Concept Stage Planned Unit Development for Detached Townhome Lots Applicant: Carlisle Village, LLC Present: John Alstad, Brad Fyle, Sam Murdoff, Marc Simpson, Lucas Wynne Council Liaison: Charlotte Gabler Staff: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC), John Rued 1. General Business A. Call to Order Chairman Brad Fyle called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. B. Consideration of aoDrovine minutes a. Special Meeting Minutes — April 01, 2017 MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 4TH, 2017. MOTION SECONDED BY SAM MURDOFF SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0. b. Regular Meeting Minutes — April 411, 2017 MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 4TH, 2017. MOTION SECONDED BY SAM MURDOFF SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0. C. Citizen Comments None. D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda Marc Simpson asked to add an item at the end of agenda. 2. Public Hearings A. Public Hearing — Consideration of a reauest for Rezoning to Planned Unit Development, a request for Development Stage Planned Unit Development for Vehicle Sales and Rental, Auto Repair — Minor, and Accessory Office and Retail Uses in a B-3 (Hiehwav Business) District Applicant: FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC Brad Fyle announced that the applicant requested tabling action. Brad Fyle opened the public hearing. Hearing no comments, the public hearing was closed. SAM MURDOFF MOVED TO TABLE ACTION TO THE JUNE 6TH, 2017 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MARC SIMPSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0. B. Public Hearing — Consideration of a reauest for Comprehensive Plan Amendment for `Places to Shop' to `Places to Work' and a reauest for Rezoning from a B-4 (Regional Business) District to a I-1 (Light Industriall) District Applicant: Jim Bowers and John Chadwick Steve Grittman stated two parcels were included in the land use application request. The properties are referred to as the Bowers/Chadwick parcels and lie between I-94 and Chelsea Road. It is west of Moon Motorsports and adjacent to the City's industrial development park. Grittman noted that the area was previously rezoned from industrial to commercial due to the economy at the time. Since commercial development has not occurred, the applicants sought to re - guide the property from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Work" and rezone from B- 4 (Regional Business) District to I-1 (Light Industrial). Grittman explained that requests for re -guiding and rezoning, the City examines a number of factors that support the change. Surrounding land use patterns, adequate utilities and roadways, and City policies for Economic Development were all mentioned. The City notes that there is becoming a tighter demand for industrial land and they have been receiving inquiries routinely. Grittman noted that the request would be consistent with the industrial land designations located to the south and west of the parcels. Chelsea Road is a major collector road and is able to accommodate large amounts of traffic. At the current time the land use is compatible with the area, but the City is also working on an interchange land study. Grittman explained that the plan is looking at the intersection of County Road 39 and I-94, which could have implications for development of the Bowers/Chadwick's parcels. Staff believes that the industrial designation would be compatible, but a possible interchange at County Road 39 and I-94 could cause commercial development pressure directly at the interchange location. Staff noted concerns with outdoor storage that would be visible from the freeway that would be allowed under the I-1 District zoning request. Staff therefore recommended rezoning the parcels to IBC (Industrial and Business Campus) District. Grittman noted that the setbacks and uses were similar with the two industrial districts, but outdoor storage would be restricted and site and building design requirements also vary between the two. City staff felt that a visual transition from the freeway to the west and south industrial would be complimentary by having the parcels rezoned to IBC, as the City's industrial park has in place covenants which restrict outdoor storage and require a higher design 2 standard. Staff recommended re -guiding the parcels from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Work" and rezoning to IBC. Brad Fyle asked if the property abuts the freeway right-of-way line. Grittman confirmed and stated there was not a designated easement along the freeway other than the standard drainage and utility easement. Charlotte Gabler commented that she believed either industrial zoning designation would match the area. Marc Simpson asked if the main difference between the IBC and the I-1 District was outdoor storage. Grittman confirmed, stating additional requirements would also apply for building materials and site plan. He also mentioned that the IBC allows a few business related uses such as office and hospitality uses. Sam Murdoff asked if there was an idea of when a possible interchange would be constructed. Grittman stated that until work has been completed on Highway 25 planning, the work on west interchange planning has been put on hold. Marc Simpson asked what the red dotted line around the parcels meant. Grittman stated that the parcels were located in the Special Use Overlay District. Fyle opened the public hearing and invited the applicant to speak first. Wayne Elam, Commercial Realty Solutions, explained that each parcel is 19 acres. He provided history of the reason for the request and stated that he sat in on an EDA Meeting, where Jim Thares noted the City was running short on industrial land. There were requests out there from industrial developers looking for 5 to 20 acres of land and with current industrial needs could not be met with Otter Creek. Following the meeting, Elam met with John Chadwick and Jim Bowers to discuss the City's need for more industrial land. Elam recommended that they request rezoning from business to industrial. Elam echoed concerns industrial developers have with the shape of the lots in Otter Creek Industrial Park and said that rectangle shaped lots were most cost effective for industrial development. Elam stated the City has 317 acres of commercially zoned land with 80 acres of commercial land on the interstate. He expected the commercial development to occur mostly south of Highway 25 or near Mills Fleet Farm. Elam also indicated that they are requesting I-1 and noted some of the differences with the I-1 and IBC Districts. He stated that he didn't feel this location would be good for a hotel. He expressed concerns with precluding outdoor storage. He reiterated the importance of the I-1 designation and offered a better screening requirement as a tradeoff. John Chadwick, 4477 Manitou Lane, Excelsior, explained the history of the parcels. Chadwick mentioned the benefits of the rezoning that would occur with industrial development especially because of the location of the lift -station. Chadwick expressed that the IBC was not consistent in the area, and that I-1 is located adjacent to the property. Gabler stated the City and IEDC are working on increasing the size of the industrial park or land availability. Wayne Elam stated there is currently IBC land located in the City, with 13 vacant, acres east of the Monticello Workforce Center and 7.5 acres in between Mills Fleet Farm and UMC. He noted that there has not been any development on IBC land. Angela Schumann responded that when the City recodified the Zoning Ordinance, the previously distinguished I -A District was removed, while the IBC was added. Land that was designated I -A was either zoned to IBC or I-1. Schumann confirmed that there has been no construction on the IBC districts. Brad Fyle commented that he didn't want to recommend approval of a rezoning if the owner didn't want it rezoned. Elam stated that he was speaking on behalf of the owners and that they wanted to rezone away from commercial to industrial, either IBC or I-1. Elam reiterated the importance of rezoning to I-1. Gabler asked if a future applicant could apply for a PUD for the parcels and request outdoor storage. Schumann confirmed and added that under the I-1, outdoor storage could be as large as the principal building. She noted that staff are currently working on a revised set of standards for screening and outdoor storage that would come forward at a future meeting. Schumann stated that staff recommend staying with the IBC District because of the restrictions on outdoor storage due to the visbilityof the double fronting lots. Fyle expressed he was leaning towards rezoning to IBC because of visibility. Elam added that with the changes that were soon to be proposed for outdoor storage and screening, he suggested increasing the height of screening. Murdoff asked for examples of outdoor storage that could be seen in this area. Grittinan responded that it depended on the development. Lucas Wynne stated that the decision is based on the desire for how Monticello wants to present itself in the future. Wynne expressed desire for a stricter set of zoning standards due to visibility, but also had concerns with restricting the type of industrial development. Elam noted that if the City rezoned the area to IBC that they also needed to look where they would put additional I-1. 11 Murdoff agreed that there was a need for I-1 with outdoor storage, but wasn't sure if those parcels were the right area. He expressed that a rezoning could possibly be a disservice as there currently is no development plans for the area. Schumann noted that the City is very aware of the need for industrial land. She expressed that the City has a Comprehensive Plan which guides areas for places to work. Schumann than talked about outdoor storage, stating that it didn't have to do strictly with the site appearance, but rather the amount of jobs, wages, and tax base. She noted the importance of balancing outdoor storage with increasing jobs and tax base. MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION PC -2017 - 008 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO "PLACES TO WORK", AND ORDINANCE NO. 6XX FOR REZONING FROM B-4 (REGIONAL BUSINESS) DISTRICT TO IBC (INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS CAMPUS) DISTRICT AS PROPOSED BY CITY STAFF. BRAD FYLE SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0. Schumann stated that the recommendation would be subject to a super -majority vote by the City Council on May 22nd. 3. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of the Communitv Develonnlent Directors Report Angela Schumann thanked Council Member Gabler for being on top of things at the legislature. Schumann noted the League of MN Cities resource information on legislature items such as interim ordinances was provided in the packet. Schumann also noted that on Thursday, May 4th the Small Area Study Steering Committee would be meeting. She expected that a plan would come before the commission in a June or July meeting. There would be a public open house at West Bridge Park. Information about educational sessions was also provided. 4. Added Items Marc Simpson asked Schumann if the Planning Commission could move to electronic agendas. Schumann responded saying that the City Council was trying them out first. She believed that the City Clerk stated within the next few years that the EDA and Planning Commission would also transfer over. 5. Adjournment MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 7:07 P.M. SAM MURDOFF SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0. Recorder: Jacob Thunander T7 Approved: May 2, 2017 5 Attest: Angela Scl� Development Director Bowers, Jim/Chadwick, John - Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning Outlot C & D, Otter Creek Crossing 1155-171-000030& 155-171-000040 1 Lengthy Legals Created by: City of Monticello Ahl AO► COMMERCIAL REALTY SOLUTIONS ww:.,.commrealiysolutions.com April 3, 2017 1 �CIEUVE D AP j 1017 RE: Zoning Change Application and Comprehensive Plan Amendment from B-4 to I-1. Properties: John Chadwick Farms, LLC XXXX Chelsea Road West, Monticello Otter Creek Crossing, 19.08 acres, Outlot D PID: 155-171-000040 JX Bowers, LLC XXXX Chelsea Road West, Monticello Otter Creek Crossing, 19.09 acres, Outlot C PID #155-171-000030 This is a joint application. Reason for Request: This property is between the City owned Otter Creek Industrial Park and I-94. There is a need for large acreage industrial parcels. This property is a logical solution for adding additional industrial land without incurring large infrastructure development costs. There is in excess of 300 acres of available property within the City of Monticello that is zoned Commercial, of which approximately 80 acres of that land is located on the interstate. It is a better use of the property for both the City and the Owners to rezone it to I-1 Industrial. 2 �' � f..� � :a�F� - ,�. �.•�t�, '�_"8t . _ � .. � ;I,(�,• •;fit .i. �"" . f. � _ ar: ,�+La„ .ta {..'' t - � " *.Y •i���;. � � fir{ - 1 �w'4+„ � A?��' }II�"a# V'�--ter .,. f , �,4' �; ,�' 7{ L JM.�- �' '` 'T�`M _.. "3•#ct��, � It I .' -. ".� � f � +� d ;�. �3•'�1,� �_ .� � ��4tVNES.:,�,�A.S 4„ +�• r�i�.�s� -- j �j LY Ln r 4 S fv. •,/��/• �w�y,� �f• •% rY ��•f } •..�A'' �� �•� � .rain ! .�� ( Y♦ I J_ _- •��r� ILwAY• •n NO�, �' 1G' � 1 ! �. �1.. ��� `j'. f _ • ►• �'}' � r . rL�fl {r 4� ��f(q,- '•"4 LO Ck EST � I • p `��p- '� : �a�c ,� �-,�'�e�a.,,`�`�rr` �" �• �� r..�r, l "�•1 � s � �``�'����•-,df � �,,+� ia+..rr ,ut�, �.�� y ��� 'r �, '�', � • I .ter-..' �•i/ ♦ i {j4`r'�f'i F A -C' Ln - - ts,. _ • . ,JJ f ��•^- z ; -'- / �► 1,� � .rte,.... `� • �`'' `` �� �• �. ": 'I {Y�,J Y moi. p�wt �•. -�� j'5����/ I .• w � y.. 3 _In. F T' � � ,yam ,� • � j 0 V, 1A p .i 1 p t LL 13 I • .. Via. -�._. � _� "' � •r �!W_C�F1.Y-�N�1R� Y.s:.l �_ '` \�:;t �+��'�� YR I1 V'JL'� Y �! Q � ( V FA ILA Birch Lake ° a North 106 e E' Lake 0 Cc 0 0.25 0.5 1 s Miles ► ° a Data Source: MnDNR, Sherburne County, Wright County, and WSB & Associates. June 9, 2014 Amended by City Council Resolution 2014-062, June 9, 2014 Legend Places to Live Lake Qr) + Places to Shop i Places to Work Places to Recreate - L 'p + Places for Community ?r Lake�) + Downtown Mixed Use o Interchange Planning Area a Urban Reserve Infrastructure 0 0� ^- Rivers and Streams iPublic Waters Inventory Wetlands (National & Public Waters Inventories) D root Potential Greenway Q J Potential Interchange ° Future Bridge *%a* Existing Arterial or Collector Road 1 'j*,* Proposed Arterial or Collector Road ^�� Powerline Monticello City Boundary Orderly Annexation Area c "' I I NE � 1�, o Land Use Plan Facilitating Redevelopment The Comprehensive Plan seeks to create a place where land use plans, policies, and controls work together with private investment to properly maintain all properties in Monticello. It is recognized that this approach may not succeed in all locations. Despite the best plans and intentions, properties may become physically deteriorated and/or economically inviable. In such places, city intervention may be need to facilitate redevelopment and prevent the spread of blight. This intervention may include: ► Acquisition of land. ► Preparation of sites for development. ► Construction or reconstruction of public improvements. ► Provision of adequate parking supply. ► Remediation of polluted land as needed. ► Removal of other physical and economic barriers to achieve community objectives. These actions may require the use of tax increment financing, tax abatement, or other finance tools available to the City. Development Strategies The following strategies will be used to implement the Comprehensive Plan in the area of Economic Development: 1. The City must use the Comprehensive Plan to provide adequate locations for future job - producing development (Places to Work). 2. The City should adhere to the Comprehensive Plan to encourage stable business setting and promote investment and expansion of facilities. 3. The City should coordinate utility planning and manage other development to ensure that expansion areas are capable of supporting new development in a timely manner. 4. The City will continue to work with existing businesses to maintain an excellent business environment, retain jobs, and facilitate expansions. 5. In addition to assisting business seeking to locate in Monticello, the City should actively target and market to businesses which will be a supplier, customer or collaborative partner to existing businesses within the community. 6. The City should target and market to businesses which would benefit from Monticello's utility and communications infrastructure. 7. The City will work with the CentraCare Health System to ensure the retention and to promote the expansion of health care services in Monticello. 8. The City will use the Comprehensive Plan to maintain and enhance the quality of life in Monticello as a tool for attracting businesses and jobs. 2008 Comprehensive Plan - Updated 2013 Economic Development 1 4-7 Ideally, the Comprehensive Plan does not have an Economic Development chapter. The Land Use Plan would be sufficient to channel market forces to meet the development objectives of the community. In reality, certain development needs cannot be met without public intervention. The Economic Development chapter of the Plan focuses on the aspects of Monticello's future that require particular attention and action by the City. These actions include: ► Attracting and retaining jobs ► Expanding the tax base ► Enhancing the economic vitality of Downtown ► Facilitating redevelopment Attracting and Retaining Jobs The creation and retention of jobs is one of the most important objectives for Monticello. Jobs, particularly jobs with income levels capable of supporting a family, are key to achieving many elements of Monticello's vision for the future. ► Jobs attract residents to the community. Jobs will pay a critical role in creating the type of "move up" housing sought by the City. ► Jobs provide the income needed to support local business and government services. ► Retention of businesses promote community stability by keeping jobs and residents in Monticello. The Community Context chapter of the Comprehensive Plan contains a section on Employment. This section contains data about employment in Monticello and of its residents. Among the key findings in this section are: ► While the community added nearly 5,000 people between 2000 and 2010 according to the U.S. Census, it only added 1,430 jobs according to the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW). In 2010, the community had 6,992 jobs according to the QCEW but 7,093 people in the labor force according to the Census. 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2013 Economic Development 1 4-1 ► The U.S. Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies' OntheMap website shows that in 2010 4,597 people leave the community each day to work, while 3,849 people come into the community to work. Only 835 both live and work in the community. ► Approximately 15% of residents in 2010 are employed within the community. This has dropped from 18% in 2002. ► As shown in Figure 4.1, 2012 data from the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) on their mnprospector.com website shows that Monticello is made up of a wide range of small to medium sized employers. Only 10 employers have more than 100 employees. Over half have fewer than four (4) employees. ► Workers for Monticello businesses come primarily from Monticello and the surrounding region. Nearly 75% of people working in Monticello live in Monticello, adjacent townships, or other places in Wright and Sherburne counties (2010 OntheMap). ► Nearly 40% of Monticello residents work in Hennepin County, with the largest percentage in Minneapolis, Plymouth, and Maple Grove. Another 15% work elsewhere in Wright County, including Buffalo and St. Michael. ► The 2007-2011 American Community Survey (ACS) Census reported a mean travel time to work of 28.5 minutes. This is up from the 2000 Census travel time of 24 minutes. The mean travel time in the 2007-2011 ACS was 29.7 minutes for Wright County and 24.5 minutes for the region overall. Figure 4-1:2012 Total Establishments by Size 1-4 Employees 254 52.05 5-9 Employees 97 19.88 10-19 Employees 64 13.11 20-49 Employees 42 8.61 50-99 Employees 21 4.30 100-249 Employees 7 1.43 250-499 Employees 2 0.41 500-999 Employees 1 0.20 Background Reports The City of Monticello conducts studies and assessments as needed to help guide its economic development efforts. The findings and recommendations of these studies are summarized below with the most recent provided first. 2010 Business Retention and Expansion Research (BR&E) Report Monticello's Business Retention and Expansion (BR&E) program was initiated by the City of Monticello, the Monticello Chamber of Commerce and Industry, DEED, and the University of Minnesota Extension. It was also sponsored by over a dozen local businesses. Through the BR&E program, 60 businesses were visited. Findings from the visits and data analysis found: ► 78% of the visited businesses were locally owned and operated. ► 20% of businesses were in manufacturing, 18% in retail trade, and 13% in other services. ► The businesses employed over 1,600 full-time and 975 part-time employees, with a trimmed average (an average where the low and high were discarded to prevent skewing) of 15.38 full-time employees, slightly down from 15.52 three years ago. The firms also had a trimmed average of 7.76 part-time employees, up from 6.96 three years ago. ► Most full-time employees are in manufacturing, food and beverage, retail trade, and medical, while part-time employees are in medical, retail trade, and tourism/recreational services. ► Survey results indicated that the medical industry is the highest employer in Monticello, followed by retail trade and manufacturing. ► Businesses in the community are fairly stable with about half expecting some type of change. The BR&E identified four strategies aimed at helping businesses become more profitable. Each strategy was accompanied by a list of potential projects intended to be ideas for the community to explore. The implementation of the projects is intended to be a collaborative effort among the various sectors of the community. The four strategies identified included: 4-2 1 Economic Development City of Monticello ► Improve Business Retention and Expansion Through Technical and Development Assistance. ► Improve Labor Force Availability and Productivity. ► Improve Infrastructure to Help Move Goods, Customers, and the Labor Force More Efficiently. ► Improve and Promote the Quality of Life in Monticello. During the 2013 comprehensive plan economic development update process, it was noted that the 2010 Business Retention and Expansion Research strategies were similar to the 2008 Development Strategies. The review process identified the need to continue similar strategies into the future. Preceding the development of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan an assessment was conducted by St. Cloud State University to determine whether a bioscience park should be established in Monticello. At that time the bioscience industry was an economic development focus statewide. While the attraction of a bioscience business is not a particular focus of Monticello today, there are findings of that study that can be useful to consider in the overall development of economic development strategies for the community. Some of the Monticello's strengths for attracting businesses included: ► Land availability (compared to Metro Area). ► Access to major highways (I-94, U.S. 10 and STH 25). ► Regional growth of employment base. ► Development of local fiber optic system. ► Proximity to universities. ► Overall location. ► Expansive park system. ► Monticello Community Center. Recommended business development activities that apply to the attraction and retention of all businesses include ensuring that there are sites suitable and attractive to potential businesses available and ready for development. The community should continue to explore and establish partnerships with a variety of stakeholders that can work together to support business attraction and retention. This includes the identification of funding sources which may be an incentive for businesses locating in Monticello. When available the City should participate in special tax zones that have been made available at the state and federal level to support business development and retention. Expanding the Tax Base A traditional objective of local economic development planning is the expansion of the property tax base. Under the current system of local government finance, property taxes are the largest source of city revenue. For this reason, it is an important aspect of economic development planning in Monticello. Understanding the Property Tax System Effective strategies to promote the growth of the tax base require a clear understanding of the property tax system. Property Valuation There are three forms of property valuation. The foundation of the property tax system is Estimated Market Value. This amount is the value of a parcel of property as set by the County Assessor. In some circumstances, the State Legislature limits the amount of Estimated Market Value that can be used for taxation. These adjustments result in the Taxable Market Value. The value used to calculate property taxes is Tax Capacity. Tax Capacity Value is a percentage of Taxable Market Value. The percentage factors are set by the State Legislature and vary by class of property. Changes in the Tax System Traditional economic development theory seeks commercial and industrial development as a means of building tax base. Historically, the system supported this approach. A dollar of estimated market value of commercial -industrial property carried a higher tax capacity value than residential property. Over the past twelve years, tax "reforms" by the State Legislature have changed this situation. 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2013 Economic Development 1 4-3 CITY OF monff(do Destination Innovation PID Owner Size (Acres) 2013 Taxes Zoning .1. ........1.55.-.171...-.000030 ..............................7. X..Bowers. LLC ...................................................................................19.09..........................................$84.1.00....................................B.-4................ 2.........155.-.171-,000040 ...............................John..Chadwi ck..Farms.LLC............................................... 1.9.09. ......................................... $8.78,00.. .................................. B.-4................ 3.........1.55.-.125-.000040 .............................. Ocello..LLC...................................................................................................1...1.,8.5..........................................$6.,452.00 ............................... .B.-3................ 4.........1.55. -.125-.0......411.0 .............................. Wells. Fargo. Bank.NA................................................................6,28.............................................$6.,042.00...............................B-3................. 5.........1.55.-.125-.000070 .............................. Ocello.. LLC.................................................................................................12.96..........................................$7,.055.00...............................B.-3................ 6.........155-500-.142210 .............................. City..of.Monticello...........................................................................4.1.1..............................................$0..00............................................B.-3................ .7...........155.-.151-,003010 .............................. Bradley.&. Sharon.,Larson.....................................................1.78..............................................$2.,950.00...............................B.-4................ s......1.5.5...1.5.7...00.1.0.1.0 ............................Ghana..Prop.exti�s..l~waxy...LP.............................................5.............................................$.G.,..G8.Q..............................B-4. ... ... ... ... 9.........15.5.-.157-.00.102................................ rma..Property.LLC.....................................................................1.67.............................................$9.,.424.0..0............................... B.-4................ 10 ...1.55 171...001021 ...............................4.134 Deegan Av..enue.NE.LLC......................................1.1.6.............................................$6,304.00...............................B-4................ 1.1.....1.55.-.174-.00.1010 .............................. Ghana.. Properties. Family. LP..........................................0.90.............................................$4.,482.00............................... B.-4................ .12.....1.55 151...004010..............................Ohana. Properties Family.LP..........................................0.57.............................................$2>.476,00...............................B-4................ 13.....155.-.193-00,1020 .............................. Highland. Bank................................................................................... 7.02.............................................$7,984.00............................... B.-`1................ 14 ...1.55 164..000030..............................City of Monticello..........................................................................7.20.............................................$0.00...........................................B-4................ 15.....15.5-164-000050 ..............................City.. of Monticello...........................................................................2.1.4.............................................$0.00 ................................................................................... B-4 16.....155-164-000040 ..............................City. of Monticello ...........................................................................6.14.............................................$0.OO............................................B-4................ 17 155 176..002011...............................City ...... ........ of Monticello...........................................................................1.29........................................... ....... ............. ................. ............ .. $0 OO............................................B-4................ ..... 18.....155-.176-00,1020 ..............................City..of Monticello...........................................................................2.70.............................................$0..00............................................B.-4................ 19 ...155-164-000020 ..............................City of Monticello...........................................................................2.83.............................................$0.00...........................................B-4................ 20. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-210-001010 Kleinbank 1.80 $6,160.00 B-3 2.1.....155-221-000010 ..............................Quad Development LLC ......................................................3.80.............................................$6,474.00...............................B-4 .............. 22. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-227-000010 Ocello LLC 43.15 $0.00 B-4 23,.....155.-500-142400 ...............................John & Mary Lundsten...........................................................38.87.........................................$.1,628.00...............................B.-3................. 24. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-213-001010 Glen & Lois Posusta 1.79 $9,800.00 B-3 .... 25.....155-500-142303 .............................. Cityof Monticello...........................................................................3.07.............................................$$0.00............................................B-3 ........................................................................... ............................................. ........................................... . ................ 26.15.5.-500-142300 ..............................City of Monticello 3.20 $0.00 B.-3................ 27. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-500-142104 Premier Bank Minnesota 18.31 $29,934.00 B-4 28.....155-01.8-001020 .............................. Ci..y..of.Monticello...........................................................................5.1.1..............................................$0..00............................................ B.-2................ 29. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-037-001010 Kean of Monticello, Inc 1.92 $4,938.00 B-2 30.....155-050-000020 Joseph Lofromboise Trust .............................................................................................................................................. 3.13 $3 340.00 .......................................................................... IBC 3.1.....155-029-002130 ..............................G&E Properties LLC..................................................................4.1.8..............................................$5,302.00...............................IBC .............. 32.....155-029-002120 ..............................G&E Properties LLC..................................................................2,03..............................................$2.:.940.00...............................IBC............... 33 ...155 029..002110..............................G&E. Properties LLC..................................................................2.1.1..............................................$3>.054.00..............................IBC............... 34.....155-029-,002,100 ..............................G&E Properties..LLC..................................................................2.20.............................................$3.,.186.00...............................IBC............... 35 l..5..5. -.0.2..9..-.0.0.2.0.9..O .............................G&.E Properties LLC 2.28............................................$3,300.00..............................IBC............... 36. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-029-002050 Kenneth Maus 5.40 .$ ,230.00 IBC 37.....155-068-00.1010 .............................. Riverwood. Bank...............................................................................19.35..........................................$30,286.00........................... B.-3................. 38. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 155-185-001010 State of Minnesota 1.58 $0.00 B-3 39.....155-202-,00,1060 ..............................IRET.Properties.................................................................................0,51..............................................$0..00............................................ B.-3................. 40.....15.5.-079-00101.0 ..............................Tyoti RPatel..............................................................................................0.79.............................................$0.00............................................B.-3................. 41. ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 155-011-000171 Monticello Industrial Park 40.83 $0.00 B2/IBC. 42.....155-212-001010 ..............................Ryan Companies US INC....................................................1.54.............................................$0.00............................................B.-4................ 43 ...1.55 212..001030 ............................ Kean of.Monticello, Inc.......................................................1.09.............................................$0 OO............................................B-4................ 44.....155-178-002030 ..............................Ryan Companies US INC ....................................................1.27.............................................$0.OO............................................B.-4................ 45 ...155 205..001020 .............. Ryan Companies US INC ................................................................1,87.............................................$0 OO...........................................B-4................ 46.....1.5.5-117-002010 ..............................MMC Land Company LLC..............................................5.04.............................................$0.00............................................B.-4................ 47 155 117-001030 MMC Company LLC... 2.24 ........ $0 00 B-4 .............. 48.....1.55.-086-000010 .............................. SPO.. LLC.......................................................................................................0.95.............................................$0..00............................................ B.-2................ 49.....1.5.5.-.196-.000020 ..............................Monticello.. Industrial. Park, ..Inc ...................................1.4 .............................................. $263.00 ..................................... -PUD..._ JKMonticello Destination for Innovation Updated: 4/2016 CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS Section 3.6 Industrial Base Zoning Districts Subsection (C) Industrial and Business Campus District Section 3.6 (C) IBCIndustrial and Business Campus District The purpose of the "IBC" industrial business campus district is to provide for the establishment of limited light industrial business offices, limited light manufacturing, wholesale showrooms and related uses in an environment which provides a high level of amenities, including landscaping, preservation of natural features, architectural controls, and other features. Base Lot Area • Minimum = 8,000 sq ft. Base Lot Width • Minimum= 100 ft. Typical IBC Lot Configuration Typical IBC Building Types City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 123 CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS Section 3.6 Industrial Base Zoning Districts Subsection (C) Industrial and Business Campus District REQUIRED YARDS (in feet) [I] Max Height (stories Max Floor Area Max Impervious (% Front Interior Street Rear / feet) Ratio (FAR) of gross lot area) Side Side 2 stories All Uses 50 30 50 40 30 feet (Reserved) (Reserved) [2] [ 1 ]: When any yard abuts a zoning district other than I -I or 1-2, the setbacks for the abutting yard must be 50 feet. [2]: Multi -story buildings may be allowed as a conditional use pursuant to Section 2.4(D)contingent upon strict adherence to fire safety code provisions as specified by the International Building Code as adopted in Title 4. Chapter I of the Monticello City Code. Accessory Structures See Section 5.3(B) for all general standards and limitations on accessory structures. Additional In the IBC district, every effort shall be made to preserve natural ponding areas and features of the land Regulations to create passive open space. ■ Section 3.3. Common District Reauirements Other Section 3.60. Standards ADDlicable to All Industrial Base Zoning Districts Regulations Section 4.1. LandscaDinQ_ and Screening_ Standards to Consult Section 4.5. Signs (not all inclusive) Section 4.8. Off -Street Parking Section 4.9. Off -Street Loading ■ Section 4.11. Buildine Materials is Lots must be a minimum ioo feet wide and more than 8000 square feet in total size z: Front yard and side street setbacks of 50 feet are required 3: High amenities and natural features are to highlight development in the IBC district 4: Maximum structure height of 30 feet unless otherwise authorized by conditional use permit Z . 3 5.30 foot interior side yard setbacks required r9o' Max Ht 6. Landscaped parking islands required every 24 spaces in the IBC district 7. Parking areas set back a minimum of 6 feet from property lines #f jr �� �• lhdal'strj71 Page 124 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Section 3.6 (D) 1.1 Light Industrial District The purpose of the "I-1," light industrial, district is to provide for the establishment of warehousing and light industrial development. Base Lot Area • Minimum = 20,000 square feet Base Lot Width • Minimum= 100 feet Typical 1-1 Lot Configuration CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS Section 3.6 Industrial Base Zoning Districts Subsection (D) 1-I: Light Industrial District Typical 1-1 Building Types City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 125 CHAPTER 3: ZONING DISTRICTS Section 3.6 Industrial Base Zoning Districts Subsection (D) I -I: Light Industrial District REQUIRED YARDS (in feet) [1] Max Height (stories Max Floor Area Max Impervious (% Front Interior Street Rear / feet) Ratio (FAR) of gross lot area) Side Side All Uses 30 15 30 15 2 stories (Reserved) (Reserved) 30 feet [2] [ I ]: When any yard abuts a zoning district other than I -I or 1-2, the setbacks for the abutting yard must be 50 feet. [2]: Multi -story buildings may be allowed as a conditional use pursuant to Section 2.40) contingent upon strict adherence to fire safety code provisions as specified by the International Building Code as adopted in Title 4. Chapter I of the Monticello City Code. Accessory Structures See Section 5.3(B) for all general standards and limitations on accessory structures. ■ Section 3.3. Common District Requirements Other Section 3.60. Standards ADDlicable to All Industrial Base Zoning Districts Regulations • Section 4.1. LandscaDlne and Screening_ Standards to Consult Section 4.5. Signs (not all Section 4.8. Off -Street Parking inclusive) Section 4.9. Off -Street Loading ■ Section 4.11. Building Materials is Minimum street side yard setback of 30 feet. 2: Minimum front yard setback of 3: Minimum lot width of ioo 4et 4: Light manufacturing plant as a permitted use 5: Interior side yard setbacks cf 15 feet 6: Minimum lot size of 2o,000 square feet 7: Rear yard setback of 15 feet, -20.000 SF MINIMUM Page 126 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section 5.1 Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure Residential Uses 5.2(C)(1) Attached Dwelling Types 5.2(C)(21(a) - Duplex p C 5.2(C)(2)(b) - Townhouse C p M 5.2(C)(2)(c) - Multiple -Family C P C C 5.2(C)(2)(d) Detached Dwelling p p p p p p None Group Residential P P P P P 5.2(C)(3) Facility, Single Family Group Residential C C C 5.2(C)(3) Facility, Multi -Family Mobile & Manufactured C C C P C 5.2(C)(4) Home / Home Park Civic & Institutional Uses Active Park Facilities P P P P P P P PP P P p p p p None (public) Active Park Facilities P P P P P P P 5.2(D)(I) (private) Assisted Living Facilities C p C I 5.2(D)(2) Cemeteries C C C C C C C C P P C 5.2(D)(3-)! None Clinics/Medical Services Essential Services P P P P P P P P None P P P P P P P Hospitals C PIN P C 5.2(D)-(4-) Nursing/Convalescent C C C C C C C C C PP 5.2(D)(5) Home Passenger Terminal C C C C None Passive Parks and Open P P P P P P P P P P P P p p p None Space Place of Public Assembly C C C C C p C 5.2(D)(6) Public Buildings or Uses C C C C C C C P C C P P C P P 5.2(D)(7) Schools, K-12 C C C C C C I I 5.2(D)(8) Schools, Higher1 None EducationF C Utilities (major) C C C 5.2(D)(9) Office Uses Offices ■ �� P P C P P P P 5.2(E1 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 319 CHAPTER 5: USE STANDARDS Section 5.1 Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure Commercial Uses Adult Uses Auction House Auto Repair — Minor Automotive Wash Facilities Bed & Breakfasts Boarding House Brew Pub Business Support Services Commercial Lodging Communications/Broadcasting Convenience Retail Country Club Day Care Centers Entertainment/Recreation, Indoor Commercial Entertainment/Recreation, Outdoor Commercial Financial Institution Funeral Services Kennels (commercial) Landscaping/ Nursery Business Personal Services Production Brewery or Micro -Distillery without Taproom Production Brewery or Micro -Distillery with Taproom or Cocktail Room Recreational Vehicle Camp Site Repair Establishment Restaurants Retail Commercial Uses (other) Specialty Eating Establishments C C P C ����� C C• C P C• CICI IP I P P C C P C P PI IP CI PI PIP CIC CP P C P P P P P C I P P P PP C PIP P OP P P I P C I a 3.7(K1 5.2(F)(2) 5.2(F)(3) 5.2(F)(4) 5.2(F)(5) 5.2(F)(6) 5.2(F)(7) None 5.2(F)(8) 5.2(F)(9) 5.2(F)(1 O) 5.2(F)(II) 5.20 (12) 5.2(F)(I 3 5.2(F)(14) 5.2(F)(I 5) 5.2(F)(I 6) 5.2(F)(I 7 5.2(F)(I 8 5.2(F)(22) 5.2(G)(I 01 5.2(F)(24) 5.2(G)(I 11) 5.2(F)(25) 5.2(F)(26) 5.2(F)(27) 5.2(F)(28) 5.2(F)(29) Page 320 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section 5.1 Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure Vehicle fuel Sales C C CI 1� 5.2(F)(30) Vehicle Sales and Rental C 5.2(F)(31) Veterinary Facilities C 5.2(F)(32) (Rural) Veterinary Facilities C C C 5.20(32) (Neighborhood) Wholesale Sales P P P None Industrial Uses Auto Repair — Major C �P P 5.2(G)(I) Bulk Fuel Sales and P P 5.2(G)(2) Storage Contractor's Yard, Temporary 5.2(G 3 Extraction of Materials I I I 5.2(G)(4) General Warehousing C C P P 5.2(G)(5) Heavy Manufacturing C 5.2(G)(6) Industrial Services C P None Land Reclamation C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 5.2(G)(7) Light Manufacturing P P P 5.2(6)(8) Machinery/Truck Repair P P 5.2(G)(9) & Sales Recycling and Salvage C C 5.2(G)( 10) Center Self -Storage Facilities P C P 5.2(G)( I1) Truck or Freight C P P 5.2 G I2 Terminal Waste Disposal & IC 5.2(�(13) Incineration Wrecker Services C P 5.20(14) Commercial Day Care Commercial Lodging C P C C C P C none none 5.2(F)( 12 5.2(F)(8) City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 321 CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section S. I Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure Commercial Recreation: Outdoor Convenience Retail Funeral Services Medical / Clinical Services Personal Services Places of Public Assembly Production Brewery or Micro - Distillery with Taproom or Cocktail Room Professional Office -Services Including Financial Institutions Restaurants, Bars < 10,000 SF Restaurants, Bars > 10,000 SF Retail Sales < 10,000 SF Retail Sales > 10,000 SF Retail with Service Specialty Eating Establishments < 10,000 SF Vehicle Fuel Sales Veterinary Facilities Residential — Upper Floors Residential — Street Level Residential — Multiple Family Residential — Townhouse Residential — Single Family Industrial PUD Public Buildings or Uses C C none C P* C C *F-2 Drive Through by CUP — C C = none L-2: NA first floor, C P P P CUP upper floors P P P P L-3: CUP C C C C none C C C C P P P C P P C C P C C P P C C P C C P C C P* P* C* P* C C C* C P C C none L-2: NA first floor, CUP upper floors none none none none L-2: NA first floor, CUP upper floors *Drive Through by CUP L-8 only none P P P P L-2: NA WrC C L-2: NA C C L-2: NA C none C none L-3: PUD Only C I C I C I P I none 5.2(F)(14) 5.2U(! 0) 5.2U(! 6) 5.2U(! 9) 5.20(22) 5.2(F)(23) 5.2(F)(24) 5.2 F 15 5.2(F)(2 1) 5.20 (27) 5.20 (27) 5.2(F)(28) 5.20(28) 5.20(28) 5.20(29) 5.20(30) 5.20(32) Page 322 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Interchange Map Option #1 Legend Proposed Land Uses 0 Commercial W Industrial Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential Gross Land Use Acres: Single Family Residential 1,499 Ac. Medium Density Residential 223 Ac. Commercial 248 Ac. Industrial 116 Ac. Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW, but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed): Single Family Residential 1040 Ac. Medium Density Residential 146 Ac. Commercial 193 Ac. Industrial 103 Ac. Existing Land Uses Commercial Industrial OInterchange Area /��� Parks and Open Space r-------- i City Boundary -----■ Proposed Roads Existing Roads CConcept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor) Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands) Parcels N 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. Or/ 4150 Olson Memorial Highway, Ste. 320, Golden Valle V. MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacplanning.com Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County February 8, 2016 120TH Birch Unnamed a m 100TH Ud La. g Bertram Lake / 1 / m 0 0 0 0 170TH r -- r E Interchange Map Option #2 Legend Proposed Land Uses 0 Commercial W Industrial Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential Gross Land Use Acres: Single Family Residential 940 Ac. Medium Density Residential 123 Ac. Commercial 123 Ac. Industrial 184 Ac. Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW, but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed): Single Family Residential 769 Ac. Medium Density Residential 115 Ac. Commercial 44 Ac. Industrial 155 Ac. Existing Land Uses Commercial O Interchange Area Industrial Parks and Open Space i --------i City Boundary -----■ Proposed Roads Existing Roads Concept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor) Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands) Parcels N 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4150 Olson Memorial HighwaV, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.110^ Website: www.nacplanning.com Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County 120TH Unnamed Birch 1 1 _. -� i o First Lake 1 100TH /Mud Lake 99TH ; Lake z Bertram Lake � �/ / 9 I 3 u z Interchange Map Option #3 Legend Proposed Land Uses 0 Commercial W Industrial Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential Gross Land Use Acres: Single Family Residential 1,235 Ac. Medium Density Residential 140 Ac. Commercial 405 Ac. Industrial 466 Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW, but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed): Single Family Residential 941 Ac. Medium Density Residential 127 Ac. Commercial 249 Ac. Industrial 303 Existing Land Uses Commercial Industrial Parks and Open Space r-------- i City Boundary -■ Proposed Roads Existing Roads OInterchange Area Concept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor) Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands) Parcels N 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4150 Olson Memorial Hiqhway, Ste. 320, Golden Valley, MN S5422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacplanning.com Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County February 8, 2016 Interchange Map Option #4 No Build Legend Proposed Land Uses 1w— Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential Gross Land Use Acres: Single Family Residential 1,172 Ac. Medium Density Residential 123 Ac. Net Land Use Acres (excludes wet areas, greenway & ROW, but incorporates land where existing roads may be removed): Single Family Residential 919 Ac. Medium Density Residential 73 Ac. Existing Land Uses Commercial Industrial Parks and Open Space r-------- i City Boundary ------ Proposed Roads Existing Roads Concept Greenway (1000 Ft. Corridor) Wet Areas (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands) Parcels N 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4150 Olson MemonaI Highway, Ste. 320, 'en valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacl)lanning.com Source: NAC, Inc., WSB & Assc., Wright County March 1, 2016 Legend I — — I ICit of Monticello I i Off ici I Zoning M P � � I \ 1 I \ \ I \ \ I \� I \ I \ \ I \ o I \\ 3 \ � I \ \ I � I I ---------— c --- ----_ I — — — — — — — — — — — —I \ Praire Rd Hi W E I \ I � I e�, I BASE ZONING DISTRICTS d Residential DistrictsBusiness Districts i -- Low Residential Densities- \ (k Kama w3 d i i AO R -A R-1 -- Medium Residential Densities T -N R-2 C R -PUD -- High Residential Densities 8-2 8-3 . 8-4 CCD Industrial Districts ] pec 1-1 R-3 ----------, 01 Swan River --------- ; Monticello M -H' PUDs L-------- High School OTHER Water OVERLAY DISTRICTS ----------1 03 il Mills Fleet Farm ----------1 04 1 Red Rooster Performance Based Overlay District Special Use Overlay District Mississippi Wild, Scenic & Rec Overlay District Shoreland District I Freeway Bonus Sign District • • \\��� ` I � c Sys ; h ., � � — \ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — jfJ/yI►.J[ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — i I[IIiijm MAN ►■ �■ IIIII �C U � !i ■S = 1111■ ■ 11111111 } -------- Council Agenda: 06/12//17 4B. Consideration of approving waiver of garbage disposal service charges for mobile home sites (WO/JO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Mobile home site owner Kjellberg's Inc. has requested that the city waive the per mobile home charge for garbage disposal services. In the request, Kjellberg's cites a law that supports the request. Currently, the City's centralized collection program is funded by Commercial properties that pay a fee for service. In addition, collection costs associated with single, duplex and triplex (SDT) homes including rental units are funded by general taxes. Kjellberg requests that mobile home parks be switched from the commercial category to the single family category. In researching this request with the MN Attorney General's office staff was informed that this is a policy matter and there is no statutory restriction. Our City Attorney is comfortable with a denial of the request. For mobile home parks, the current total per unit charges are $10 and $13 per month for 60 and 90 gallon carts, respectively. The city pays Advanced Disposal $7.89 per month for garbage disposal and $2.85 per month for recycling (total $10.74) regardless of cart size. Taxes are not included in any of the calculations. The tax on residential garbage services is 9.75% on the first $8 of the 60 -gallon -cart charge and on the first $10 of the 90 -gallon -cart charge. If the city waived the charge, it would pay 9.75% on the $7.89 ($.77) Advanced Disposal charges per unit. The mobile home charges are the same as those for residents with extra carts and apartments without dumpsters. There are 333 mobile homes paying $13 per month and 76 paying $10. Total annual revenue from the charge is $60,500. The city would pay $4,600 in solid waste taxes if the charge is waived. The financial impact is approximately $65,100. The property tax levy generates 80% of the General Fund's revenue. It is likely the levy would need to be adjusted to accommodate any reduction in this or any other charge. As it goes, the argument is that the other rentals (single family, duplex or triplex) in the city do not pay for their garbage. Multifamily units of four or more do pay for garbage. For example, Spirit Hills Townhome Association pays for 40 carts. Other large multifamily units procure services directly from the hauler. An addendum to the above argument is mobile home related property taxes should cover the garbage service just like other non -multifamily rental units. The average individual mobile home pays $39.05 in city property taxes annually. Add to this the $66.11 per unit site property tax (mobile home site taxes divided by the number of units) for a total per unit city property tax $105.16. This is far below the city tax generated by other non -multifamily rental property. See the attached Schedule of Property Taxes and Garbage Charges for details. Council Agenda: 06/12//17 B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to deny waiving the garbage disposal charges for mobile home park sites. 2. Motion to deny waving the garbage disposal charges for mobile home park sites but identify the related policy as a point for study in conjunction with the 2018 budget process. 3. Motion to approve waiving the garbage disposal charges for mobile home parks. 4. Motion to C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The finance director and city administrator recommend Alternative #1. The current garbage charges are reasonable and consistent with those charged other multifamily units. According to a representative in the Minnesota Attorney General's office this is a city policy matter and it is not restricted by statute. If Council wishes to conduct a more detailed review of the request in the context of the overall policy, then Council should select alternative 2. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Schedule of Property Taxes and Garbage Charges B. Letter of request from Kjellberg's Inc 2 Schedule of Property Taxes and Garbage Charges 6/6/2017 Mobile Home Total mobile home tax collection $ 15,542.07 Number of mobile homes $ 398 Average city tax per mobile home $ 39.05 + Mobile home site taxes - city $ 20,956.42 Number of mobile homes $ 317 Distributed taxes per mobile home $ 66.11 + Total city taxes per mobile home $ 105.16 = Garbage charges (90 gallon cart) $ 156.00 Total generated per mobile home $ 261.16 < Rental Unit - Duplex Taxable market value $ 148,200 City taxes generated $ 614.68 Number of units 2 City taxes per unit $ 307.34 < Amount greater than mobile home $ 46.18 Rental Unit - Single Family Taxable market value $ 167,200 City taxes generated $ 554.79 Applicable to each unit $ 554.79 Total city taxes generated per unit $ (105.16) Difference $ 449.63 < Amount greater than mobile home $ 188.47 KKjellberg's, Inc. Favn.ay Buvf�SUw& 1929 #1000 Kjellberg's MHP 9127 State Hwy 25 NE Monticello, MN 55362 Phone: (763) 295-2931 Fax: (763) 295-2991 www.Kiellbere.co May 2, 2017 City of Monticello City Council Attention: Mayor/City Council RE. In Regards to Garbage Services for our Community We have approached the City previously and no action has been taken. Since that time, we have discovered a 1974 law that Mobile Home Parks are to be treated in same manner as other Residents. Mobile Home Owners pay taxes on their homes the same as any other Monticello residential homeowner. In addition to that, Parks pay taxes on the property which in turn a portion thereof goes to the City. We also pay additional service costs that the City does not pay for the services provided below - 0 Street Maintenance • Construction • Snowplowing • Street Sweeping • Street Lighting • Water Control • Storm Shelter The above costs are in addition to the payment of garbage costs. The main difference between a Mobile Home Residence and a Residential Stick -Built Home is that the Mobile Home Park pays for many of the services that the City provides to Stick -Built Homes. We respectfully request that the City of Monticello offer the Kjellbergs Mobile Home Park the same garbage service as any other residence would receive. General Manager Kjellbergs Inc. Council Agenda: 6/12/17 4C. Consideration to authorizing notification of contract non -renewal to Veolia Water for wastewater treatment plant services (WO/JO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The two-year extension of the prior five-year agreement for operations and maintenance services with Veolia expires on December 31, 2017. The (5) year contract automatically renews for five (5) years unless a written notice of nonrenewal is provided 120 days prior to expiration. The notice of nonrenewal provides the city with an opportunity to re -negotiate a new contract without time as a constraint. The non -renewal also provides the city with additional time to research other service options, including staffing the plant with city employees. Al. Budget Impact: The notification has no budget impact. Subsequent research will require staff time and possibly some consulting fees. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal. A3. Legal Review: Not applicable. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve notification of contract non -renewal to Veolia for operations and maintenance services for the wastewater treatment facility and to authorize staff to research other service options, including staffing the plant with employees. This research includes authorization to contact current plant employees about continuing on as city employees. 2. Motion to approve notification of contract non -renewal to Veolia for operations and maintenance services for the wastewater treatment facility. 3. Other C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City Staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Additional Data and Analysis to be provided at workshop preceding the City Council meeting City Council Agenda: 06/12/17 4D. Modifv Hi-Wav Liquor hours to accommodate Sundav sales (WO,RJ) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Recently passed legislation allows cities to permit liquor stores to open on Sunday from the hours of 11:00am to 6:00pm (7 hours). The first Sunday the store can be open is July 2nd. Hi -Way Liquors is currently open all Holiday's except Thanksgiving and Christmas and those falling on Sunday. Days and hours of operations are annually set by Council in December and modified by Council action as needed. Prior to the law's passage, Sunday opening was discussed at Council on February 13, 2017, during the annual liquor store presentation. At its April 19th meeting, the personnel committee directed staff to be present at the May 17th personnel committee meeting to discuss Sunday opening. The liquor store manager clearly laid out his case for staying with the current schedule of operations, which excludes Sunday sales. Without a clear consensus, the personnel committee directed staff to bring the item to Council for consideration on June 12th Items to consider before making a determination: Customer behavior — Stocking -up: Customer behavior is somewhat fickle when viewed from an individual perspective. Aggregate customer behavior balances extremes against the masses. Per transaction sales on Friday and Saturday indicate that some customers are stocking -up for the weekend. Sunday opening would reduce stocking -up purchases, decreasing efficient per hour sales on Friday and Saturday and possibly lower total consumption. Some stocking -up by travelers leaving for the weekend likely occurs before Friday noon as indicated by higher per transaction amounts. Returning travelers, who are somewhat weather dependent, would need to arrive back by 6:00pm to take advantage of Sunday opening. Staff recruitment and retention: As the economy, employees and potential employees have more options. The prospect of a Sunday shift could make it harder to recruit and retain employees who value weekend family or personal time. Additional part-time employees would be needed to keep hours per part-time employee under 30 hours per week. Demographic factors have made attracting and retaining employees more challenging. Increase operating costs/inefficiencies: Staffing (capacity) can be changed to meet demand but a certain level must be maintained regardless of demand. Fully utilized capacity results in efficiencies, spreading fixed (or semi fixed) costs over more transactions. Split purchases, as opposed to stocking up, offset the gains of additional sales. Competition: Area municipal liquor stores have indicated they will probably open on Sundays. Currently, grocery and convenience stores can sell 3.2% beer and wine coolers. City Council Agenda: 06/12/17 Craft Breweries: Craft breweries can sell growlers on Sunday under current law. Growlers are jug -like containers filled with beer sold as off -sale (consumed off the premises). A municipal liquor store open on Sunday could reduce the volume sold at local breweries. Additionally, the liquor store sells craft beers in bottles and cans. Restaurants/Bar and Grills: Other local establishments may see a sales decline with customers having other options. The Brand: Hi -Way Liquors combines a clean, comfortable store environment with a knowledgeable and friendly staff. It does not project the feel of a City ATM that works it employees seven days a week. Some of the store's localness will be lost with Sunday sales. Al. Budget Impact: The budget impact is based on assumption contained in the supporting data. All assumptions are open to debate. I provide the rationale for the assumptions I made. A2. Staff Workload Impact: There is a significant impact, which is discussed above. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt changes to the liquor store schedule to allow Sunday sales on December 24 and December 31 of 2017 for hours allowed by statute. 2. Motion to adopt changes to the liquor store schedule to allow Sunday sales from Memorial Day through Labor Day and on December 24 and December 31 for hours allowed by statute. 3. Motion to adopt changes to the liquor store schedule to allow Sunday sales for the remainder of the year for hours allowed by statute. 4. Motion to deny changes to the liquor store schedule. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Except for the last alternative of maintaining the current schedule, Alternative Actions are placed in order of staff preference. Leadership and staff will accept the outcome of your action and faithfully implement the change in a manner that delivers the best result. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Schedule of Assumptions, Sales Estimate, Expense Details B. Monthly Sales Statistics for 2016 — by Month C. Monthly Sales Statistics for 2016 — by Year D. Schedule of Sales by Day of Week E. Liquor 2016 Stats by Quarter F. Sunday Liquor Sales Memo Schedule of Assumptions, Sunday Sales Estimate, and Expense Details Key Assumptions: Margin Number of Transactions Part-time Employees Full-time Employees Sunday Sales Estimate Average low per transaction Number of transactions Gross Margin Wages & Benefits Transaction Charges Net* 23% Blended margin for beer, liquor, and wine 328 Transactions on 2nd worst day of week for 11-6 time slot. 4 1 $ 20.62 328 $ $ 6,763.36 $2,000 23% $1,750 $ 1,555.57 $1,500 $1,250 $ 622.42 $1,000 $ 255.84 $750 $ 677.31 $500 $250 157.76 $ 95.69 Fica 7.65% $(250) 12.07 $(500) Net Revenue by Transaction Levels *A portion of these sales will be reflected in lower stock -up purchases during the week. Expense Details Staffing $ Full -Time Part-time Payrate $ 19.72 $ 13.67 Hours Total Per Transaction Charge 8 7 Total Pay $ 157.76 $ 95.69 Fica 7.65% $ 12.07 $ 7.32 Pera 7.5% $ 11.83 $ 7.18 Sub Total $ 181.66 $ 110.19 1 4 Total Wages & Benefits $ 181.66 $ 440.76 Per Transaction Charges Bank charge per transaction $ 0.57 Utility charge per transaction $ 0.11 Miscellaneous per transaction $ 0.10 Total Per Transaction Charge $ 0.78 $ 622.42 C Liquor store sales statistics for one year with conditional setting of each month (2016). Green = High Yellow = Medium Red = Low $ 25.26 $ 27.80 $ 27.12 $ 26.90 Transactions $ 27.17 $ 26.75 $ 26.98 $ $ 27.39 10:00 AM $ 25.69 $ 25.32 $ 25.42 $ 27.94 $ 30.68 $ 29.73 Hr. Start Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total 9:00 AM $ 28.56 $ 27.41 389 467 566 500 576 463 488 403 434 24.37 5626 10:00 AM $ 28.27 551 552 643 722 717 837 719 648 582 656 25.11 $ 8153 11:00 AM 754 746 822 940 971 899 1105 974 865 888 922 1380 11266 12:00 PM 971 828 984 1079 1152 1114 1377 1100 1098 1044 1115 1559 13421 1:00 PM 1050 992 1111 1188 1304 1273 1501 1335 1201 1294 1256 1802 15307 2:00 PM 1409 1420 1552 1566 1615 1639 1876 1710 1604 1621 1627 2153 19792 3:00 PM 1898 1893 2032 2109 2262 2156 2229 2067 2078 2213 2012 2556 25505 4:00 PM 2390 2332 2714 2549 2740 2631 2617 2632 2519 2717 2635 3051 31527 5:00 PM 2147 2221 2617 2533 2654 2491 2618 2679 2681 2621 2474 2645 30381 6:00 PM 1666 1760 2045 2224 2351 2131 2356 2243 2246 2341 1998 2213 25574 7:00 PM 1227 1291 1627 1827 1940 1853 1947 1887 1908 1861 1584 1635 20587 8:00 PM 901 983 1272 1381 1465 1519 1707 1549 1437 1174 1140 11 15726 9:00 PM 936 873 1025 1231 1403 1563 1597 1314 1146 1015 1010 14151 Total 16234 16241 18742 19737 21145 20486 22343 20672 19919 19774 18863 22860 237016 Dollars Hr. Start Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total 9:00 AM $ 8,378.69 $ 9,477.16 9828.5 $ 11,794.56 $ 15,733.68 $ 13,560.59 $ 15,495.36 $ 12,554.66 $ 13,257.44 $ 10,781.16 $ 11,710.11 $ TIF1111=11111 $ 154,118.29 10:00 AM $ 14,309.82 $ 13,950.89 14033.25 $ 17,968.32 $ 22,147.91 $ 21,312.89 $ 24,335.38 $ 20,552.53 $ 17,624.07 $ 15,481.73 $ 18,352.64 $ 31,771.34 $ 231,840.77 11:00 AM $ 18,910.86 $ 19,956.36 20674.71 $ 24,566.87 $ 26,948.81 $ 23,667.70 $ 31,559.72 $ 26,693.83 $ 21,769.36 $ 24,468.40 $ 26,705.94 $ 45,001.40 $ 310,923.96 12:00 PM $ 24,504.68 $ 22,613.54 23981.23 $ 29,610.81 $ 32,833.14 $ 31,497.93 $ 39,606.19 $ 29,774.75 $ 28,776.75 $ 28,002.38 $ 30,823.04 $ 49,429.92 $ 371,454.36 1:00 PM $ 26,600.88 $ 24,907.59 28027.8 $ 31,423.71 $ 35,231.86 $ 34,771.16 $ 41,880.26 $ 34,854.59 $ 31,490.62 $ 34,105.96 $ 34,839.84 $ 56,502.34 $ 414,636.61 2:00 PM $ 35,662.55 $ 35,007.88 41178.02 $ 39,995.90 $ 43,913.70 $ 42,671.24 $ 50,030.71 $ 42,983.62 $ 41,350.64 $ 44,637.47 $ 42,211.08 $ 66,412.4$ 526,055.30 3:00 PM $ 44,362.99 $ 46,162.34 49922.06 $ 53,401.95 $ 59,987.86 $ 55,974.06 $ 56,638.16 $ 51,132.46 $ 52,671.31 $ 56,676.78 $ 52,000.93 $ 74,522.9A $ 653,453.87 4:00 PM $ 55,048.06 $ 53,479.46 64104.3 $ 61,385.55 $ 68,602.52 $ 64,717.49 $ 65,457.53 $ 63,753.22 $ 59,682.16 $ 65,891.59 $ 63,776.58 $ 80,965.35 $ 766,863.81 5:00 PM $ 50,789.42 $ 55,068.97 62855.85 $ 60,386.88 $ 68,621.86 $ 59,557.22 $ 64,694.17 $ 63,126.60 $ 65,034.21 $ 65,173.04 $ 60,839.32 $ 71,899.19 $ 748,046.73 6:00 PM $ 40,258.79 $ 42,466.34 49439.79 $ 54,214.83 $ 58,461.35 $ 51,573.94 $ 56,671.43 $ 53,481.65 $ 53,569.19 $ 56,719.23 $ 50,731.46 $ 60,810.06 $ 628,398.06 7:00 PM $ 29,152.16 $ 31,865.36 38671.23 $ 42,810.22 $ 47,822.96 $ 44,797.56 $ 48,853.73 $ 43,634.40 $ 45,236.24 $ 45,460.85 $ 40,627.64 $ 45,466.44 $ 504,398.79 8:00 PM $ 21,035.69 $ 23,858.92 29508.26 $ 32,550.64 $ 37,496.53 $ 35,169.30 $ 43,040.37 $ 35,467.61 $ 33,824.61 $ 26,873.99 $ 27,479.68 $ 31,983.80I $ 378,289.40 9:00 PM $ 19,995.10 $ 19,668.62 23096.54 $ 29,074.75 $ 32,342.06 $ 34,486.44 $ 37,572.96 $ 26,975.15 $ 25,150.34 $ 22,065.48 $ 24,969.13 $ 24,919.3A $ 320,315.91 Total $ 389,009.69 $ 398,483.43 $ 455,321.54 $ 489,184.99 $ 550,144.24 $ 513,757.52 $ 575,835.97 $ 504,985.07 $ 489,436.94 $ 496,338.06 $ 485,067.39 $ 661,231.02 $ 6,008,795.86 Per Transactions Sales $ Hr. Start Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total 9:00 AM $ 25.54 $ 27.00 $ 25.27 $ 25.26 $ 27.80 $ 27.12 $ 26.90 $ 27.12 $ 27.17 $ 26.75 $ 26.98 $ $ 27.39 10:00 AM $ 25.69 $ 25.32 $ 25.42 $ 27.94 $ 30.68 $ 29.73 $ 29.07 $ 28.58 $ 27.20 $ 26.60 $ 27.98 $ 3 $ 28.44 11:00 AM $ 25.08 $ 26.75 $ 25.15 $ 26.13 $ 27.75 $ 26.33 $ 28.56 $ 27.41 $ 25.17 $ 27.55 $ 28.97 $ 32.6 $ 27.60 12:00 PM $ 25.24 J 27.31 $ 24.37 $ 27.44 $ 28.50 $ 28.27 $ 28.76 $ 27.07 $ 26.21 $ 26.82 $ 27.64 $ 31.7 $ 27.68 1:00 PM $ 25.33 $ 25.11 $ 25.23 $ 26.45 $ 27.02 $ 27.31 $ 27.90 $ 26.11 $ 26.22 $ 26.36 $ 27.74 $ 31.3 $ 27.09 2:00 PM $ 25.31 $ 24.65 �M $ 25.54 $ 27.19 $ 26.03 $ 26.67 $ 25.14 $ 25.78 $ 27.54 $ 25.94 $ 30.8 $ 26.58 3:00 PM $ 23.37 $ 24.39 $ 24.57 $ 25.32 $ 26.52 $ 25.96 $ 25.41 $ 24.74 $ 25.35 $ 25.61 $ 25.85 $ 29.16 $ 25.62 4:00 PM $ 23.03 $ 23.62 $ 24.08 $ 25.04 $ 24.60 $ 25.01 $ 24.22 $ 23.69 $ 24.25 $ 24.20 $ 26.5$ 24.32 5:00 PM $ 23.66 $ 24.79 $ 24.02 $ 23.84 $ 25.86 $ 23.91 $ 24.71 $ 23.56 $ 24.26 $ 24.87 $ 24.59 $ 27.1 $ 24.62 6:00 PM $ 24.16 $ 24.13 $ 24.18 $ 24.38 $ 24.87 $ 24.20 $ 24.05 $ 23.84 $ 23.85 $ 24.23 $ 25.39 $ 27.4 $ 24.57 7:00 PM $ 23.76 $ 24.68 $ 23.77 $ 23.43 $ 24.65 $ 24.18 $ 25.09 $ 23.12 $ 23.71 $ 24.43 $ 25.65 $ 27.81 $ 24.50 8:00 PM $ 23.35 $ 24.27 $ 23.20 $ 23.57 $ 25.59 $ 23.15 $ 25.21 $ 22.90 $ 23.54 $ 22.89 $ 26.70 $ 24.06 9:00 PMI $ 21.36 $ 22.53 $ 22.53 $ 23.62 $ 23.05 $ 22.06 $ 23.53 $ 20.53 $ 21.95 $ 21.74" $ 24.72 $ 22.64 Total $ 23.96 $ 24.54 $ 24.29 $ 24.79 $ 26.02 $ 25.08 $ 25.77 $ 24.43 $ 24.57 $ 25.10 $ 25.72 $ 28.93 $ 25.35 Liquor store sales statistics for one year with conditional setting as the entire year (2016). Green = High Yellow = Medium Red = Low Jun Jul Transactions Sep Oct Nov Dec Total 9:00 AM $ 25.54 $ 27.00 $ 25.27 $ 25.26 $ 27.80 $ 27.12 Hr. Start Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 9:00 AM--- $ 29.73 351 389 467 or 566 j 500 576 463 488 403 434 661 10:00 AM 557 551 552 643 722 717 837 719 648 582 656 969 11:00 AM 754 746 822 940 971 899 1105 974 865 888 922 1380 12:00 PM 971 828 984 1079 1152 1114 1377 1100 1098 1044 1115 1559 1:00 PM 1050 992 1111 1188 1304 1273 1501 1335 1201 1294 1256 1802 2:00 PM 1409 1420 1552 1566 1615 1639 1876 1710 1604 1621 1627 2153 3:00 PM 1898 1893 2032 2109 2262 2156 2229 2067 2078 2213 2012 2;j 4:00 PM 2390 2332 2714 2549 2740 2631 2617 2632 2519 2717 2635 3 5:00 PM 2147 2221 2617 2533 2654 2491 2618 2679 2681 2621 2474 2645 6:00 PM 1666 1760 2045 2224 2351 2131 2356 2243 2246 2341 1998 2213 7:00 PM 1227 1291 1627 1827 1940 1853 1947 1887 1908 1861 1584 1635 8:00 PM , 901 983 1272 1381 1465 1519 1707 1549 1437 1174 1140 1198 9:00 PM 936 873 1025 1231 1403 1563 1597 1314 1146 1015 1010 1038 Total 16234 16241 18742 19737 21145 20486 22343 20672 19919 19774 18863 22860 Total 5626 8153 11266 13421 15307 19792 25505 31527 30381 25574 20587 15726 14151 237016 Dollars Hr. Start Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total 9:00 AM $ 8,378.69 $ 9,477.16 9828.5 $ 11,794.56 $ 15,733.68 $ 13,560.59 $ 15,495.36 $ 12,554.66 $ 13,257.44 $ 10,781.16 $ 11,710.11 $ 21,546.38 $ 154,118.29 10:00 AM $ 14,309.82 $ 13,950.89 14033.25 $ 17,968.32 $ 22,147.91 $ 21,312.89 $ 24,335.38 $ 20,552.53 $ 17,624.07 $ 15,481.73 $ 18,352.64 $ 31,771.34 $ 231,840.77 11:00 AM $ 18,910.86 $ 19,956.36 20674.71 $ 24,566.87 $ 26,948.81 $ 23,667.70 $ 31,559.72 $ 26,693.83 $ 21,769.36 $ 24,468.40 $ 26,705.94 $ 45,001.40 $ 310,923.96 12:00 PM $ 24,504.68 $ 22,613.54 23981.23 $ 29,610.81 $ 32,833.14 $ 31,497.93 $ 39,606.19 $ 29,774.75 $ 28,776.75 $ 28,002.38 $ 30,823.04 $ 49,429.92 $ 371,454.36 1:00 PM $ 26,600.88 $ 24,907.59 28027.8 $ 31,423.71 $ 35,231.86 $ 34,771.16 $ 41,880.26 $ 34,854.59 $ 31,490.62 $ 34,105.96 $ 34,839.84 $ 56,502.34 $ 414,636.61 2:00 PM $ 35,662.55 $ 35,007.88 41178.02 $ 39,995.90 $ 43,913.70 $ 42,671.24 $ 50,030.71 $ 42,983.62 $ 41,350.64 $ 44,637.47 $ 42,211.08 $ 66,412.49 $ 526,055.30 3:00 PM $ 44,362.99 $ 46,162.34 49922.06 $ 53,401.95 $ 59,987.86 $ 55,974.06 $ 56,638.16 $ 51,132.46 $ 52,671.31 $ 56,676.78 $ 52,000.93 $ 74,522.97 $ 653,453.87 4:00 PM $ 55,048.06 $ 53,479.46 64104.3 $ 61,385.55 $ 68,602.52 $ 64,717.49 $ 65,457.53 $ 63,753.22 $ 59,682.16 $ 65,891.59 $ 63,776.58 $ 80,96544 $ 766,863.81 5:00 PM $ 50,789.42 $ 55,068.97 62855.85 $ 60,386.88 $ 68,621.86 $ 59,557.22 $ 64,694.17 $ 63,126.60 $ 65,034.21 $ 65,173.04 $ 60,839.32 $ 71,899.19 $ 748,046.73 6:00 PM $ 40,258.79 $ 42,466.34 49439.79 $ 54,214.83 $ 58,461.35 $ 51,573.94 $ 56,671.43 $ 53,481.65 $ 53,569.19 $ 56,719.23 $ 50,731.46 $ 60,810.06 $ 628,398.06 7:00 PM $ 29,152.16 $ 31,865.36 38671.23 $ 42,810.22 $ 47,822.96 $ 44,797.56 $ 48,853.73 $ 43,634.40 $ 45,236.24 $ 45,460.85 $ 40,627.64 $ 45,466.44 $ 504,398.79 8:00 PM $ 21,035.69 $ 23,858.92 29508.26 $ 32,550.64 $ 37,496.53 $ 35,169.30 $ 43,040.37 $ 35,467.61 $ 33,824.61 $ 26,873.99 $ 27,479.68 $ 31,983.80 $ 378,289.40 9:00 PM $ 19,995.10 $ 19,668.62. 23096.54 $ 29,074.75 $ 32,342.06 $ 34,486.44 $ 37,572.96 $ 26,975.15 $ 25,150.34 $ 22,065.48 $ 24,969.13 $ 24,919.34 $ 320,315.91 Total $ 389,009.69 $ 398,483.43 $ 455,321.54 $ 489,184.99 $ 550,144.24 $ 513,757.52 $ 575,835.97 $ 504,985.07 $ 489,436.94 $ 496,338.06 $ 485,067.39 $ 661,231.02 $ 6,008,795.86 Per Transactions Sales $ Hr. Start Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total 9:00 AM $ 25.54 $ 27.00 $ 25.27 $ 25.26 $ 27.80 $ 27.12 $ 26.90 $ 27.12 $ 27.17 $ 26.75 $ 26.98 $ 32.60 $ 27.39 10:00 AM $ 25.69 $ 25.32 $ 25.42 $ 27.94 $ 30.68 $ 29.73 $ 29.07 $ 28.58 $ 27.20 $ 26.60 $ 27.98 $ 32.79 $ 28.44 11:00 AM $ 25.08 $ 26.75 $ 25.15 $ 26.13 $ 27.75 $ 26.33 $ 28.56 $ 27.41 $ 25.17 $ 27.55 $ 28.97 $ 32. $ 27.60 12:00 PM $ 25.24 $ 27.31 $ 24.37 $ 27.44 $ 28.50 $ 28.27 $ 28.76 $ 27.07 $ 26.21 $ 26.82 $ 27.64 $ 31. $ 27.68 1:00 PM $ 25.33 $ 25.11 $ 25.23 $ 26.45 $ 27.02 $ 27.31 $ 27.90 $ 26.11 $ 26.22 $ 26.36 $ 27.74 $ 31.36 $ 27.09 2:00 PM $ 25.31 $ 24.65 $ 26.53 $ 25.54 $ 27.19 $ 26.03 $ 26.67 $ 25.14 $ 25.78 $ 27.54 $ 25.94 $ 30.85 $ 26.58 3:00 PM $ 23.37 $ 24.39 $ 24.57 $ 25.32 $ 26.52 $ 25.96 $ 25.41 $ 24.74 $ 25.35 $ 25.61 $ 25.85 $ 29.16 $ 25.62 4:00 PM $ 23.03 $ 22.93 $ 23.62 $ 24.08 $ 25.04 $ 24.60 $ 25.01 $ 24.22 $ 23.69 $ 24.25 $ 24.20 $ 26.54 $ 24.32 5:00 PM $ 23.66 $ 24.79 $ 24.02 $ 23.84 $ 25.86 $ 23.91 $ 24.71 $ 23.56 $ 24.26 $ 24.87 $ 24.59 $ 27.18 $ 24.62 6:00 PM $ 24.16 $ 24.13 $ 24.18 $ 24.38 $ 24.87 $ 24.20 $ 24.05 $ 23.84 $ 23.85 $ 24.23 $ 25.39 $ 27.48 $ 24.57 7:00 PM $ 23.76 $ 24.68 $ 23.77 $ 23.43 $ 24.65 $ 24.18 $ 25.09 $ 23.12 $ 23.71 $ 24.43 $ 25.65 $ 27.81 $ 24.50 8:00 PM $ 23.35 $ 24.27 $ 23.20 $ 23.57 $ 25.59 $ 23.15 $ 25.21 $ 22.90 $ 23.54 $ 22.89 $ 24.10 $ 26.70 $ 24.06 9:00 PM, $ 21.36 $ 22.53 $ 22.53 $ 23.62 $ 23.05 $ 22.06 $ 23.53 �$ 20.53 $ 21.95 $ 21.74 $ 24.72 $ 24.01 $ 22.64 Total $ 23.96 $ 24.54 $ 24.29 $ 24.79 $ 26.02 $ 25.08 $ 25.77 $ 24.43 $ 24.57 $ 25.10 $ 25.72 $ 28.93 $ 25.35 Schedule of Sales by Day of Week - 2016 Category M T W Th F S Total Beer $ 258,528.93 $ 253,533.29 $ 303,068.77 $ 370,558.44 $ 747,978.15 $ 834,893.45 $2,768,561.03 Liquor 168,392.94 156,205.54 188,699.62 218,443.60 438,539.86 454,815.61 1,625,097.17 Wine 87,273.79 96,395.49 115,265.52 122,068.95 224,687.02 243,475.66 889,166.43 Misc Tx 9,011.59 7,890.20 10,620.38 13,008.22 28,421.16 33,444.35 102,395.90 Misc Non -Tx 5,688.50 4,820.52 5,806.83 7,055.51 15,502.84 19,723.22 58,597.42 Total $ 528,895.75 $ 518,845.04 $ 623,461.12 $ 731,134.72 $ 1,455,129.03 $ 1,586,352.29 $5,443,817.95 Days $ 52 $ 52 $ 52 $ 51 $ 53 $ 53 $ 313 Average $ 10,171.07 $ 9,977.79 $ 11,989.64 $ 14,335.97 $ 27,455.26 $ 29,931.18 $ 17,392.39 ■ Beer Liquor ■ Wine ■ Misc Tx Misc Non -Tx Sales by Day of Week - 2016 $1,800,000 $1,600,000 $1,400,000 ■ ■ $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 _ $400,000 $200,000 ■ ■ M T W Th F S ■ Beer Liquor ■ Wine ■ Misc Tx Misc Non -Tx $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 1st Quarter 2016 Sales 1 111 111 111 111 II 111 IIIA 11 III III IIIIIIIIIJIIII- ■ Beer ■ Liquor ■ Wine 2nd Quarter 2016 Sales I 111 111 I I I I I IIS � 1� � III IIFI I llrt 1 III 1 k6 i W k6 i W W k6 k6 kD k6 i W k6 i kD k6 i kD k.6 i W w W w •--� ci c -I 0 O p p p O p p O 0 O p p NO Np 0 Np O 0 Np 0 0 Np 0 0 Np 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N \ \ 0\0 \ \ l\f1 \ \ N \ \ D\1 \ \ \ \ \ N \ \ O\1 \ \ l\D \ \ C \ \ N \ \ \ \ M \ r, \ tD \ \ \ O � ON r'1 r-1 \ � ON \ C) N (D O O \ O N \ r-1 - \ N N \ OM N \ O O \ 00 OM \ O O \ r-1 r'1 \ N \ \ c -I \ \ \ ri N \ N \ \ c -I O \ O \ \ N O \ -4W \ \ N r'1 \ N \ \ N N \ N \ \ N N \ O \ \ M O \ O \ \ M \ N \ \ M N \ N \ \ M N \ '- r-1 `"1 ri p ri ci p ri i"1 p ci ri O N N p N N p N N p N N p N M p M M p M M p M M p M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ■ Beer ■ Liquor ■ Wine 2nd Quarter 2016 Sales I 111 111 I I I I I IIS � 1� � III IIFI I llrt 1 III 1 ■ Beer ■ Liquor ■ Wine W k6 k6 kD k6 i W k6 i kD k6 i kD k.6 i W w w ci ci c -I p p p p p p p p Np Np 0 Np 0 0 Np 0 0 Np 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N \ \ 0\0 \ \ M \ \ N \ \ D\1 \ \ l\D \ \ cv \ \ O \ \ r, \ \ cv \ \ O \ \ r, \ \ \ \ \ O tD O \ r'1 r-1 \ � ON \ N N \ O O \ O N \ r-1 - \ N N \ OM O \ O O \ -4 -4 \ " N \ N N O ItT zl, O zl* 'tT O ItT O ItT O u1 M O M M O M u1 O u1 Ln O u1 W O W W O O W O O W O W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ■ Beer ■ Liquor ■ Wine $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 3rd Quarter 2016 Sales 11 F- III- c -I lD l0 r1 lD l0 c -I l0 lD r1 lD l0 i --I lD l0 ci l0 lD r1 l0 lD i --I lD l0 ci l0 l0 _I l0 lD -i lD l0 _I lD l0 _I l0 lD i -i O c -I � p c -I � p � .--� O c -I � p c -I � p � .--� O � •--� O c -I � p � � p � .--� O c -I � p c -I � p � .--� O N O O N O O N O O N O O N O O N O O N O O N O O N O O N O O N O O N O O N O O N \ N N \ N \ \ 00 N \ N \ In N \ N \ \ N N \ N \ \ O1 N \ N \ N N \ \ N N N \ \ O1 N \ N \ \ l0 N \ N \ \ N N N \ \ O1 N \ N \ \ l0 N \ N \ \ M N \ N \ \ O M ON M 0 M O- M OM M tD � \ I, O \ O \ \ I, r -I \ N \ \ I, -4 \ \ \ I, N \ N \ \ I, O \ O \ \ 00 O \ \ \ 00 c'I \ N \ \ 00 N \ N \ \ 00 \ M \ \ N O \ O \ \ Ql C'I \ N \ \ N C'I \ N \ \ N N \ \ \ Ql O n n O n n O ^ n O n n O 00 00 O 00 00 O 00 00 O 00 00 O 00 00 O Q1 a) O N Q1 O N Q1 O Q1 N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ■ Beer ■ Liquor ■ Wine 4th Quarter 2016 Sales -�-- V1 F L N F t In F L In F L N F L N F L V1 F L V1 F LL > Ll > Ll Ll Ll Ll VJ VJ VJ VJ VJVJ VJ6 6 i i 6 i i i i i 6 ci ci l0 -i -1 6 r1 -1 6 r1 -1 L6 -i ci L6 -i ci L6 r1 ci L6 r1 -i -i l0 -I l0 l0 -I lD l0 c -I lD lD a --I lD lD i -i N N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N O N N N O O N O O N O O N O O N O O N \ \ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \ N \ N \ \ N \ \ N \ \ \ N N \ N N \ N N \ N N \ N N \ N � \ ao r1 \ U1 00 \ M N In \ Olr1 \ 00 \ N In \ O N 111 \ \ N \ \ \ \ l0 \ \ M \ \ O O O w N M i"I C -I O N N I, N O M a O O O �--I c -I I� �--I N N 00 O O m I, CD O Q1 N N l0 00 M cI cI O i i O i ci O ci ci O i -1 N -1 ci N -1 -1 N c -I ci c -I a --I c -I -I N N ci N N ci N N ci N N r1 N N N N N N i --I N c -I N c -I N c -I N c -I N a --I ■ Beer ■ Liquor ■ Wine MMBA: Sunday Sales: Convenience at What Cost? MMBA Mission Statement Summary Sheet Directors Comina Events Sundav Sales. Convenience at What Cost? Maaazine Rates Magazine Archives Endorsement Policv Commercial Membership Apdhcation Contact Us Weekly Newsletter Archives Sian UD for the Electronic Newsletter Scholarship Position Paoers MMBA Photos Liquor Store Manaaement Articles Spanish Warnino Sian Kea Registration Tao_ Order Form Alcohol Awareness Server Training New Minnesota Drivers License A letter to Minnesota Retailers from Southern Wine & Soirits Chairman & CEO Harvev Chaplin Home Links: Page 1 of 13 General MMBA Position MMBA is opposed to this initiative. We recognize Sunday Sales would benefit some of our members. However, the majority of facilities would eventually be negatively impacted. Sunday Sales is not about working hours. It is about spreading six days of sales over seven days of expenses. Alcohol Is not a destination purchase. People don't get up and say "let's go alcohol shopping." It is an impulse purchase that, in the vast majority of locations, doesn't pay the day's bills. Minnesota cars buying in Wisconsin on Sunday are coming from multiple locations to one store. In addition, Sunday Sales has the potential to lead to the elimination of 3.2 beer and ultimately Wine & Strong Beer in Grocery / Convenience Stores. Finally, public safety considerations should outweigh convenience. Public Safety 2012 Minnesota State Substance Abuse Strategy Maintaining) limitations on alcohol availability including: alcohol sales restricted to 6 days a week statewide and to current locations (designated liquor outlets not grocery or convenience stores) httos://edocs ohs state mn us/Ifserver/Public/DHS-6543-ENG Effectiveness of Policies Maintaining or Restricting Days of Alcohol Sales on Excessive Alcohol Consumption and Related Harms By The Hartford Courant Repealing a ban on Sunday alcohol sales at stores increases the number of alcohol-related accidents and deaths, according to a task force of the U. S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that reviewed 14 studies in which laws restricting alcohol sales were changed. Much of the debate over whether to allow alcohol sales on Sunday focused on such issues as revenue for the state and small business vs. big business, but there's been little discussion about the implications for public health. Minnesota Licensed /n 2010, a team of researchers that make up the CDCs Task Beveraae Assn. Force on Community Preventive Services published research in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine examining alcohol MN Leaislature consumption in locations where bans on alcohol sales on certain days had been enacted, abolished or modified. Alcohol & Gamblina Enforcement "We found strong and consistent evidence that limiting alcohol availability by maintaining existing limits on the days of sale is an National Alcohol effective strategy for preventing excessive alcohol consumption Beveraae Control and related harms, "the authors wrote. Association http://www.municipalbev.com/sundaysales.htm 6/3/2017 MMBA: Sunday Sales: Convenience at What Cost? Minnesota Gamblino_ Robert Hahn, one of the authors of the analysis, said that "based Control Board on our conclusions, our position is to recommend against" repealing bans on the sale of alcohol. Minnesota Statute 340A View Study, (PDF): Minn. Administrative Effectiveness of Policies Maintaining or Restricting Days of Rule 7515 Alcohol Sales on Excessive Alcohol Consumotion and Related Harms Page 2 of 13 Two Studies Show how Sunday Sales Negatively Impacted Public Safety in New Mexico The original studv concludes... Our results strongly suggest that increasing alcohol availability on Sunday was associated with increases in alcohol-related motor vehicle crashes and fatalities. Legalizing Sunday package alcohol sales may increase state tax revenues, but at the same time it exacts a significant price that is paid by crash victims and their loved ones, health care providers. insurers, and law enforcement and judicial systems. State legislators should consider these consequences when deciding policy that is intended to serve the public well-being. htto://www ncbi nlm.nih oov/omc/articles/PMC1751802/ The follow-uo studv concludes... Our previous work has shown a significant impact of increased ARC risks when the ban on Sunday packaged alcohol sales is repealed. The current study shows that this impact varies considerably across counties in New Mexico. Furthermore, the negative impact of legalized Sunday packaged alcohol sales appear to have been mitigated in counties with large communities that quickly held an election to re -institute a ban on Sunday packaged alcohol sales. View Study, (PDF): Geooraohic variability in alcohol-related crashes in response to legalized Sundav packaged alcohol sales in New Mexico 2013 Duluth News Tribune Editorial In 2013, the Duluth News Tribune published an editorial in favor of Sunday Sales. The article began: Run out of beer on a Sunday and what do some Duluthians do? They jump into their cars and motor across a bridge to a liquor store in Superior for more, hoping the few they've already had weren't a few too many. That potentially tragic scenario is an unfortunate reality that plays out more regularly than many of us would care to think about, and not only in Duluth, but in all Minnesota border communities. This argument indicates people who have had too much to drink should go to a liquor store closer to home to purchase more alcohol. http://www.municipalbev.com/sundaysales.htm 6/3/2017 MMBA: Sunday Sales: Convenience at What Cost? Business / Economics Sunday Sales: Sunday Sales Not Good for the Bottom Line By Edina City Manager Scott Neal There's an annual discussion going on right now at the State Legislature around the question of whether the good citizens of Minnesota should be allowed to purchase beer, liquor and wine on Sundays. The State Legislature sets the rules for such important life choices as this, so it's only natural that they study the issue carefully, hear from all sides on the matter and then make a rational decision that's good for all concerned, right? Right. Now 171 be the first to admit that upon moving to Minnesota in 1996 that it struck me as a little odd that I could not buy beer, liquor or wine on a Sunday. I had moved here from Iowa where you could buy beer (OK, yes, it was 3.2 beer), liquor and wine in aisle 10 at any Hy -Vee grocery store on Sunday or any other day of the week. When I first moved here I thought it was odd that cities with municipal liquor stores would partner with private liquor stores to fight efforts to allow Sunday sales. Why? Why wouldn't we want our stores to be able to sell on Sundays? Sure, employees aren't going to like it, but isn't one of our key objectives in the liquor business to make money, and wouldn't we make more money if we could be open on Sundays and sell more product? This is the third municipal liquor city that I've managed in Minnesota. I'm not a brilliant business mind, but I know a thing or two about the liquor business, so let's take a look at the numbers in Edina to see if the Sunday sales idea makes any sense for us. City staff project our 2011 total sales at our three municipal retail stores to be $13,367,072. We project our total 2011 operating expenses at $12,338,481. That means our projected operating income for 2011 will be just over one million dollars at $1,028,591. In 2011, our stores will be open 307 days. We will be closed on 58 days. 52 of those 58 days are Sundays. 6 of those 58 days are holidays. In examining the hypothetical impact of the proposed legislation, l will assume that we would be open 359 days and closed 6 days in 2011. Our 2011 projected sales per day is $43,540. Our 2011 projected operating costs per day are $40,190. if you do the math, the difference between these two numbers multiplied by the number of days we will be open in 2011 (307) will equal our projected not operating income for 2011: $1,028,591. If the Legislature changes the law on Sunday sales, it will be difficult for us not to be open on Sundays, so I will assume in this hypothetical that our stores would be open for 52 additional days in 2011. If we further assume that our projected 2011 daily operating costs of $40,190 would not be materially different on Sundays, we would add 52 more days of operating costs at $40,190/day to our annual operating cost totals. This would increase our projected annual operating costs in 2011 by Page 3 of 13 http://www.municipalbev.com/sundaysales.htm 6/3/2017 MMBA: Sunday Sales: Convenience at What Cost? $2,089,729 from $12,338,481 to $14,428,210; an increase of 16.9%. On the revenue side, if we were open on Sundays and wanted to keep our projected net operating income the same ($1,028,591), we would need total gross sales of at least $15,456,801, which is an amount equal to the sum of our projected Sunday sales scenario operating expenses of $14,428,210 + $1,028,591. This gross sales goal would require an increase in our sales of $2,089,729; and increase of 15.6%. So, if we want to stay exactly where we are right now, fiscally, in the Sunday sales scenario we would need to hold down the increase in our projected operating expenses to 16.9% or less and increase our projected gross sales by at least 15.6%. Is that possible? Maybe, but the challenge is steep. In 2010 our total customer count for our three store operation was 506,4 10. Our total sales were $12,862, 719. Average sales per customer then were $25.39. For the sake of this example, if we hold our average sales per customer steady at $25.39, it would take an annual increase of 102,365 in our 2011 customer count, an increase of 20%, in order to create the $15,456,801 we need to generate our projected $1,028,591 net annual operating income. If we work the equation the other way, keeping the customer count steady at 506,410, we would need a 20% increase in our average sales/customer, from $25.39/customer to $30.521customer) in order to gross $15,456, 801 in order to net $1,028o591. Getting back to my previous question: Is it possible to maintain our current level of net operating income in Sunday sales scenario? Short answer. I doubt it. The likelihood that we will experience an increase in our annual operating costs under this scenario of something in the neighborhood of 16.9% is high. The likelihood that we will experience an increase in our annual gross sales under this scenario of something in the neighborhood of 15.6% is, in my view, low. I do not doubt that we will experience an increase in gross sales, but I do not see any really evidence that would support an increase of close to 15.6%. Those are the numbers I'm looking at. If I owned a liquor store in Stillwater, Winona or Moorhead. I am sure that I'd see this situation differently. But I don Y. My interpretation of the numbers is that the Sunday sales scenario is not good for the bottom line of the City's municipal liquor operation. I could be missing something here, but in the end, here's how I boil it down: good for consumers, but bad for business. Page 4 of 13 Regulatory Changes Have No Clear Positive Fiscal Effects — Ball State University: We find that permitting Sunday sales reduces the number of retail package store establishments by roughly eight to ten percent under different model specifications. When combining a relaxation of Sunday sales with sales at non -package stores facilities, we observe the loss of just over 25 percent of package stores. This result indicates that any such regulatory change will likely result in only changes in the structure of the industry. No cross border effects of the legislation were observed. As a consequence, regulatory changes have no clear positive fiscal effects as http://www.municipalbev.com/sundaysales.htm 6/3/2017 MMBA: Sunday Sales: Convenience at What Cost? Page 5 of 13 increased sales in one retail sector simply displace another, without boosting cross border sales. View Study, (PDF): Packaae Store Retail Structure and the Regulation of Alcohol Sales Don't Count Sunday Liquor Tax Revenues Just Yet — Growth & Justice The latest debate over Sunday liquor sales in Minnesota has featured claims that Minnesota is somehow missing out on $10 million in tax revenues. I've debunked parts of this claim via twitter and comments sections, but thought it worth a post... htto!/arowthand iustice.tvoeoadcom/mv webloo/2011/02/dont-count-sundav- liauor-tax-revenues-lust-vet html Connecticut: Sunday Sales Hurts Business By Brian M. Johnson, New Britain Herald As the state approaches the one year anniversary of Sunday booze sales, liquor store owners aren't in a celebratory mood. Legalization of Sunday sales was signed into law May 20, 2012. Area liquor store owners said the law has not resulted in increased profits and has actually hurt their businesses. Miroslaw Szczyg/a, owner of Five Star Liquor, in New Britain, said the law is terrible for families and businesses. "This is the worst decision we've made in Connecticut, " said Szczygla. "We can't compete with Massachusetts unless we cut or lower our liquor taxes. Most of the time Sunday there is no business until after 1 p.m. when the alcoholics come in. Most regular customers have bought all their liquor by Saturday. Now l have no time for family at all. We can even afford to take off time for holidays. " Bob Shah, owner of A&S Package Store in New Britain compared working all week to living in a golden jail. "I haven't made any extra sales and I can't leave unless l find someone trustworthy to manage the store. The state hasn't made any extra money from this either. People still go out of Connecticut to sell liquor because of the high liquor tax. In Massachusetts they have no sales tax on liquor. What the state really needs to do is look at the numbers and review their tax rates. " Vijay Patel, owner of Discount Package Store in New Britain says he can't afford to stay open an extra day as a small liquor store. "Our sales totals are no match for last year and there's no little for rest, "said Patel. "I dont have time to see my kids. They go tri school and by the time l get home at 10 p.m. they're already asleep. " http://www.municipalbev.com/sundaysales.htm 6/3/2017 MM13A: Sunday Sales: Convenience at What Cost? In neighboring Bristol, Bruce Wotfert, owner of Wolfs Wines & Spirits in Bristol said the law hasnY done what the government promised. "It has made no difference at the end of the week, "said Wo/fert. "Our sales are about the same, except now we're working seven days instead of six. That means we're spending more on electricity and heating and giving up family time." Raj Chaddah, owner of Town & Country Discount Liquors in Bristot sees the law as a huge burden. "Our sales have just been spread out over another day, with the extra cost of manpower, " said Chaddah. Marvin Friedman. owner of Maple End Package Store in Bristol, said the law eliminates profits from people stocking up for Sunday. "When the law was first signed we didn't open on Sunday and our business began to fall off, "said Friedman. "When we opened Sunday, it got back to where it was, but there's been no real difference in total volume of sales. Before we could open on Sundays, people would come in Saturday to stock up. Now there's no incentive. People may show up on Sunday, but nobody is buying extra. Any business that's open for more days pays additional costs, so we actually lose out. " Colorado: Sunday Sales Leads to Wine & Beer in Grocery Stores Surrounded by a cadre of gas station managers and owners, primarily representing 7 -Elevens and Loaf'N Jugs, Parker stood in front of 66,000 dramatically stacked signed petitions during a press conference in the Old Supreme Court Chambers hearing room at the state Capitol on Tuesday. The petitions, collected at 7 -Eleven and Loaf'N Jug stores statewide. ask the Legislature to allow gas stations and grocery stores to sell full-strength beer. Page 6 of 13 Until last year (2008), Colorado law prohibited liquor stores, which sell futi-strength beer, from remaining open on Sundays. That had given an opening to convenience store owners, who are able to sell only lower strength 3.2 beer, permitting them a monopoly on liquor sales one day each week. However, as soon as the Legislature passed a partial repeal of the state's Blue Laws in 2008 allowing liquor stores to stay open and sell full-strength beer on Sundays, Parker says convenience stores such as his lost 76 to 80 percent of their Sunday beer sales. The storeowners say beer sales make up 6 percent of their total revenue. Parker said now that 3.2 beer is obsolete, 'The loss of sales has hurt us, and today we are only asking for the ability to compete. " Parker could be in luck. if state Sen. Jennifer Viega, D -Denver, and Rep. Buffie McFadyen, D -Pueblo West, are successful, a bill they are moving through the Legislature this year would allow the sale of full-strength beer at convenience stores. http://www.municipalbev.com/sundaysales.litm 6/3/2017 MMBA: Sunday Sales: Convenience at What Cost? "I certainly recognize that, with the passage of Sunday sales (last year), there has been a detrimental impact on you, on your sales and to the grocery stores who are now selling an obsolete product, " Viega said to the room of storeowners. "Consumers want easy access (to products), and this allows for that." Not everyone is behind the change. Owners of liquor stores and craft breweries said allowing convenience and grocery stores to sell full-strength beer is paramount to putting another nail in their industry's coffin. Although liquor store and brewery owners say the simple convenience of not having to make a special trip to a liquor store to buy full-strength beer seven days a week is of concern, they also expressed the fear that grocery stores will undercut the price of their liquor products as part of a rewards program for frequent shoppers. Currently, King Soopers and Safeway discount gasoline to reward customers who reach a spending threshold. "This legislation is not about convenience and fair competition, it's aboutjobs, jobs, jobs, "said Jeanne McEvoy, executive director for the Colorado Licensed Beverage Association. McEvoy said similar legislation in other states has had a devastating effect on liquor store owners, and she said South Dakota offers an example of how such a policy can destroy businesses and reduce employment opportunities statewide. In South Dakota, 48 liquor stores were in business before similar legislation was passed. Within 10 years of the legislation's passage, only three remained. She estimates that 700 liquor stores in Colorado would close within three years should the proposed law pass. "If the state of Colorado has a problem with Sunday sales, then fix Sunday sales, "McEvoy said. "But robbing Peter to pay Paul is never good policy." However, the bill, which was introduced this week, may not have such a dire consequences for owners of Colorado's liquor stores, supporters said. Five states, including Colorado, still sell 3.2 percent beer while 36 states allow beer and wine sales in grocery stores, McFayden said, adding that those 36 states have found ways to make it work. Page 7 of 13 The Effort Continues in 2013: Battle Brewing Over Beer in Supermarkets By Peter Marcus, The Colorado Statesman Another legislative brouhaha is brewing this year over whether to allow more supermarkets and convenience stores in Colorado to sell full-strength beer, wine and liquor. The battle is nothing new to the legislature. This year would mark the fifth most recent attempt at allowing grocery and convenience stores to sell full-strength beer. The last effort was in 2011 when two bills that would have allowed the sale died. It is a polarizing issue, with supermarkets and convenience stores on one side of the fence, and craft brewers and liquor stores on http://www.municipalbev.com/sundaysales.htm 6/3/2017 MMBA: Sunday Sales: Convenience at What Cost? the other side. But Rep. Kevin Priola, R -Henderson, said he is forging ahead this year with a measured plan to allow more grocery and convenience stores in Colorado to sell full-strength beer, wine and liquor. Rather than open the sale up to all supermarkets and convenience stores, Priola would like to first expand the current cap from one to five on liquor licenses offered to retailers. Current Colorado law prohibits the sale of full strength beer, wine and liquor in most supermarkets and convenience stores. But state law permits owners to hold one liquor license, which is why so-called "big -box stores" like Target and Rite Aid, have one Flagship location where they sell full-strength alcoholic products. Alt the other locations are restricted to selling 3.2 percent or lower beer, known as "near beer." After The Colorado Statesman first wrote about Priola's bill last month, some statehouse observers believed that the Adams County lawmaker would introduce the legislation as one of his first three bills. But Priola said bill drafters put the measure on paper before it was ready. He plans on introducing the bill in the next two weeks. "Full-strength beer is in supermarkets, it's just one license," commented Priola. "The additional licenses affects more than just grocery stores. It also would help out folks like Applejack (Wine and Spirits) and Argonaut [Liquor], as well as many other small business persons who want to have more than one location." Priola would not disclose whether he had been approached by anyone to draft the bill, such as by the supermarket or convenience store lobby. He said he is working with all sides on the issue. "Overall, the goal I've had is to come to some piece of legislation that helps here, helps there, and in the end leaves most folks relatively harmless, " said Priola. "I've sat in business for four years, I've heard the issue over and over, I feel like / know more about the issue than most, "Priola added, noting his past committee assignments to the House Business Affairs and Labor Committee, and then to the House Economic and Business Development Committee. "I can kind of cut through the BS that you hear from both sides on what will and what will not happen." Bill frustrates craft beer industry But Priola will surely face another heated exchange. He is already receiving resistance from the craft brew industry and from smaller package stores. They are fearful that expanding licenses would tilt the playing field and put them out of business. The Colorado Brewers Guild, the Wine and Spirits Wholesalers Association of Colorado and the Colorado Licensed Beverage Association have all told The Statesman that they have concerns about the legislation, but they are waiting until a measure is introduced before officially supporting or opposing the proposal. Priola is attempting to gain their support by including language that focuses on smaller craft breweries. His measure would allow Page 8 of 13 http://www.municipalbev.com/sundaysales.htm 6/3/2017 MMBA: Sunday Sales: Convenience at What Cost? breweries that produce only a limited number of barrels per year to sell their product in all supermarkets and convenience stores in the state. The lawmaker said he is still working on a gallon - production limit to qualify. The legislation would also ban the sale of caffeinated alcoholic beverages and place an alcohol limit of 10 percent on so-called "alcopops," or flavored alcoholic beverages, that can be sold in grocery and convenience stores. Brian Dunn, owner of Great Divide Brewing Company in Denver, believes the measure is a backdoor, small step to allowing full- strength beer in all supermarkets and convenience stores in Colorado. He said the current model works for his industry, noting double-digit growth, and he was reluctant to see change. "We don't like it, "lamented Dunn, who sat down with Pnola to discuss the bill. "Craft is growing well enough without being in grocery stores, we don't feel like we need it." Sales of craft beers rose 14 percent in the first half of 2012 over the same period in 2011, and production rose by 12 percent, according to the Boulder -based Brewers Association. The industry also saw revenue growth of 12 percent in 2010 and 15 percent in 2011. Colorado ranks second for the most number of breweries, and it ranks third in breweries per capita. There are 161 licensed craft breweries in Colorado, with over 60 in planning, according to the Colorado Brewers Guild. Since opening in 1994, Great Divide has seen unprecedented growth. Last year the brewery saw a 24 percent increase in barrel production, and the year before that there was a spike of nearly 30 percent. In Colorado alone, the craft beer company grew by nearly 50 percent, marking multiple years of similar growth, said Dunn. "We're growing fine in Colorado, " he said. "We don't need Priola's bill to help us grow." "You didn't ask us before you wrote the bill, "Dunn continued of Priola's effort. "We're not in favor of it. I'm quite sure the big brewers won't be in favor because they're excluded. What are you doing? Nobody likes this bill, except for grocery stores." Grocers and retailers net behind effort And indeed grocery stores are supporting the proposal. Kris Staaf, regional director of public affairs and government relations at Safeway, said expanding the cap allows supermarkets and convenience stores to show what small growth might look like. She also pointed out that the bill would be subject to local government and community approval, which does not guarantee that supermarkets would be allowed to quickly expand their alcohol sales. Safeway's flagship location for selling alcohol is located in Littleton at Broadway and Mineral. Staaf said a study has shown that since the store started selling full-strength beer, wine and Page 9 of 13 http://uww.municipalbev.com/sundaysales.htm 6/3/2017 MMBA: Sunday Sales: Convenience at What Cost? Page 10 of 13 liquor five years ago, there has not been a negative impact to surrounding package stores. "There was a lot of doom and gloom, people predicted all these worst case scenarios when that store went up with liquor," said Staaf "I can tell you that the businesses around it, the liquor stores around it, we still have them in the same radius that we did before." "There's one that if you walk out the front door and turn to the right, you can actually see it from the front door, "she continued. "But also other liquor stores have opened their doors in the area since we've been open." Sleet also tried to expel fears that larger chains would not stock smaller craft brews, noting that the Safeway store in Littleton carries a wide selection of Colorado beer and wine. "From the smaller guys to the larger brewers, it's a really nice, healthy mix, "she said. "So, if you look at the crystal ball, are we going to carry every single product? Probably not. But what we're going to try to do is if we were able to do something where we can sell like we do in the Littleton store, I think you can look at a nice product mix." Chris Howes, president of the Colorado Retail Council, said the issue comes down to consumer convenience and bringing Colorado in line with other states. "We'd like to eventually bring Colorado up to speed and modernize its liquor licensing so that we look like the rest of the country, " said Howes, whose organization has been lobbying for years to extend alcohol sales to all grocery and convenience stores. Howes does not believe that Priola's bill offers a backdoor to extending alcohol sales in Colorado. "I think it's a front door, 'he said. "It's a small door, but definitely the front door" "Any step to bring a popular product to our members' stores is a positive one, "Howes added. "We'd like to see eventually all of our grocers be able to sell these popular products." Proponents Proclaim: Sunday Liquor Sales In Colorado Lead To Extra $2 Million In Tax Revenue For State. However...... The Denver Dailv News The Distilled Spirits Council reported (in 2010) that Sunday liquor sales have helped Colorado's alcohol tax revenues grow 6 percent over the past year, though local liquor stores are split on whether the expanded hours are anything to toast. Colorado State Treasury's data shows that liquor, beer and wine tax revenues increased by $2,056,858 in the 12 months following July 1, 2008, when the bill allowing Sunday liquor sales went into effect. Although the data doesn't separate the tax revenues generated by liquor stores from bars and restaurants, the Distilled Spirits Council -- a group that represents a majority of distilled http://wwtiv.municipalbev.com/sundaysales.htm 6/3/2017 MN113A: Sunday Sales: Convenience at what Cost:' spirit companies -- says that since more than 75 -percent of that tax revenue comes from liquor stores, and because Colorado restaurants and bars have seen their revenues drop in the past six months, it's credible to say that liquor stores played a big role in that 6 -percent tax revenue increase. However: Page 11 of 13 The Distilled Spirits Council admits the figures are unverifiable estimates. In addition, the figures include the 2% national average gain for that year. See Growth & Justice Article for More: intol/or-c.✓than.trustice.tvr>eaa:icomlmv vvebloo/2D111p2labrrr- rount-sunda v-liouor-tax-revenues-iust-vest. htmt Legislative Action Samole Citv Resolution, (PDF) Samole Letter to Leaislator l Governor, (PDF) Newspaper Editorials: Ferous Falls Journal Sunday Liquor Law Fine As /s Make no mistake, it would be beneficial to consumers if the Legislature passed a bill to allow liquor stores to sell alcohol on Sunday. However, the hardship it would put on liquor stores, including municipal liquor stores in Fergus Falls and the surrounding area, seem to outweigh the convenience to consumers. Since the days of prohibition, the laws preventing the sale of alcohol at liquor stores on Sundays was to maintain control over the sale of a product that clearly can be harmful if abused. That said, the fact is that Minnesotans are used to the law, and have planned their shopping patterns around it. Changing it would mean liquor stores, both private and municipal, would spend more money on staffing, utilities and other expenses, and would not likely see an increase in revenue, since sales would be spread out over seven days instead of six. Other than convenience, there does not seem to be a dire need to change the law. Let's just leave it as it is. Albert Lea Tribune With six days a week to purchase liquor, one has to wonder why it would be necessary to buy alcohol on Sundays. While the state legislature ponders whether to allow such sales, we have to step up and say please don't allow it. According to various websites, alcohol is a contributing factor in http://www.municipalbev.com/sundaysales.htm 6/3/2017 MN113A: Sunday Sales: Convenience at What Cost? Page 12 of 13 four most -commonly committed crimes: minor possession, open container, public intoxication and DWI, obviously the most serious of the four. And one site said that alcohol was a factor in 40 percent - or nearly half of all violent crimes. We know that eliminating the sale of alcohol all together simply breeds new crimes and really isn7 a logical option these days. From an economic standpoint, municipal liquor stores aren't necessarily going to sell more alcohol than they do in six days, and they will incur expenses associated with being open - paying staff hours, lights, etc. However, with six days to purchase alcohol, and given the crime statistics and economic impact locally, we doubt it's necessary to offer liquor an additional day. Austin Dailv Herald It shows up on the legislative agenda every couple of years, but there never seems to be much support for the idea of expanding Minnesota liquor store operating hours to include Sundays. As in the past, this year's version of the bill should be allowed to quietly fade away because for a variety of reasons Minnesota does not need Sunday liquor sales. There has never been any solid indication that opening liquor stores on Sunday would create an appreciable benefit for Minnesotans (or anyone else). There are some reasons that it is a bad idea. For one thing, anyone who can't get himself or herself organized to stop by the liquor store prior to Sunday probably has less need than most to buy any liquor. More seriously, it is very clear Sunday hours would be a problem for small operators who would, for competitive reasons, be forced to open their stores on Sunday without gaining any appreciable sales. Minnesota's leaders have already introduced a multitude of tax and policy plans that, if they become taw, are going to break the backs of some small businesses. Another hardly seems like good policy. Minnesota has gotten along just fine without Sunday liquor sales. No one is harmed by keeping the current law intact, and there would be harm for changing it. Letting the bill die would be good public policy. Did you know liquor sales is not the only Blue Law in Minnesota? Minnesota Law (Statute 168.272) provides that the sale of cars on Sundays is forbidden. In fact, anyone who sells a car on a Sunday is guilty of a misdemeanor the first time and a gross misdemeanor the next time. So, for those who support repealing the ban on liquor sales on Sunday — is it about government not interfering in commerce, or is it about more access to alcohol? 168.275 SALE OF MOTOR VEHICLE ON SUNDAY FORBIDDEN. Any person who shall carry on or engage in the business of buying, selling, exchanging, dealing in or trading in new or used motor vehicles; or who shall open any place of business or lot http:/hvww.municipalbev.com/sundaysales.litm 6/3/2017 MM13A: Sunday Sales: Convenience at What Cost? Page i 3 of 13 wherein the person attempts to or does engage in the business of buying, selling, exchanging, dealing or trading in new or used motor vehicles; or who does buy, sell, exchange, deal or trade in new or used motor vehicles as a business on the first day of the week, commonly known and designated as Sunday, is guilty of a misdemeanor for the first offense, and a gross misdemeanor for each succeeding offense. This section does not apply to the sale of (1) trailers designed and used primarily to transport watercraft, as defined in section 868.005 subdivision 18, (2) trailers designed and used primarily to transport all -terrain vehicles, as defined in section 84 92. subdivision 8, (3) trailers designed and used primarily to transport snowmobiles as defined in section 84 81, subdivision 3, or (4) utility trailers as defined in section 168.27 subdivision 20. http://www.municipalbev.com/sundaysales.htm 6/3/2017 Minnesota House of Representatives State Representative Marion O'Neill 549 State Office BuildingState Office Building 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. 651-296-5063 For more information contact: House GOP Communications 651-296-5522 Posted: 2017-06-01 Share on: House Briefs Legislative Update 1 b. L� f _._ilf1 With students from Monticello who were at the Capitol recently Speaking about my bill to bring SG to Minnesota on the House Floor Dear Neighbor, Tweet The 2017 legislative session concluded in late May with some big wins for Minnesota families and taxpayers. Included in the final budget agreed upon by the House, Senate and Governor Dayton are historic tax relief and transportation bills, increased funding for our schools and meaningful reforms to help improve the lives of citizens in Wright County and across the state. First, House Republicans strongly advocated for a large middle-class tax relief package this session that puts money back in the pockets of families, seniors, Main Street businesses, college graduates and farmers. Highlights of our $650 million tax bill include reducing the state income tax paid on Social Security, a first -in -the -nation tax credit for student loan debt, property tax relief for farmers, modifications to the child and dependent care credit, and exempting the first $100,000 in property value on the extra tax paid by our hometown businesses. Hardworking taxpayers helped fund our state's surplus, and it's only right that money is returned to you. Additionally, Minnesotans asked for greater investments in our roads and bridges, and we delivered without raising the gas tax or license tab fees. From $16 million for small city road projects to funding nearly 100 bridges on MnDOT's priority list, we focused on critical transportation infrastructure needs across the state. What's more, we made sure that state taxpayers will not be responsible for future operating costs of Southwest Light Rail without legislative approval. Page 1 of 2 News Items • Leoislative Update - (Posted: 201; • LEGISLATURE SENDS COMPL BUDGET TO GOVERNOR'S DE 2017 -OS -26) • Leoislative Update - (Posted: 201; • Archived News Items • Subscribe to RSS News Feed! • Read more about RSS. Audio & Video • Audio Commentary • RSS Audio Commentary (pod Galleries No image galleries found Page 1 of 2 6/5/2017 Page 2 of 2 For our students and schools, we increased funding for education over the current biennium by $1.35 billion, putting more money into every classroom. We also implemented several reforms including an overhaul of our broken teacher licensure system to tackle our state's critical teacher shortage, as well as a repeal of "last in, first out" which will allow for more than just seniority to be factored in when schools are forced to reduce staff. Working to hire and retain world-class teachers is important to provide every Minnesota child with a world-class education. Other highlights from the bills passed at the end of session include ensuring that executive rulemaking will not expand Minnesota driver's licenses to undocumented immigrants, tuition freezes at two and four year MnSCU schools, and funding veteran priorities. Furthermore, I also championed several provisions and bills this year that were signed into law by Governor Dayton. Those include: • Repealing the Made in Minnesota Solar Program, allowing our state to reinvest funding from ineffective programs that benefit a few to funding more effective clean energy programs that benefit the state as a whole, saving ratepayers money • Funding to support internship opportunities and workforce development for college students with Minnesota businesses in the STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) fields • Putting Minnesota at the forefront of bringing 5G small cell technology to our state • Adding felony strangulation of a family or household member to the list of what must be considered in custody cases, helping protect children from being placed in the care of a violent parent or guardian • Making changes to how Harassment Restraining Orders (HROs) are handled, allowing any peace officer to find and serve a person with an order in order to better protect women, children and victims of violence • Working to restructure technical parole violations, recommending community chemical dependency treatment options for non-violent drug offenders which will help people get the help they need and reduce our prison population • Funding grants with the YWCA to help economically -challenged Minnesotans gain valuable job skills and career counseling to help them secure credentials to work in child development and early childhood education • Making technical changes and recommendations by the Unemployment Insurance Advisory Council With all of the good work that was done for Minnesotans this session, it is unfortunate that with the signing of this compromise budget, the governor also made an unprecedented and unconstitutional attempt to silence another branch of government for four years by defunding the Legislature. After such a productive session, his behavior on this front was extremely disappointing and the Legislature will be looking to defend your voice and your representation at the Capitol by seeking outside counsel. In all, this was a positive session for the citizens and taxpayers of Minnesota. I am pleased we got our work done and were able to fund our shared priorities including tax relief, education, and roads and bridges. If you need assistance on an issue pertaining to state government, my office is available to you. You can e-mail at Rep. Marion .ONeill@House.MN or call my office at 651-296-5063. You can also write a letter to me. My office address at the Capitol is 549 State Office Building, 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, St. Paul, MN 55155. Sincerely, Marion Page 2 of 2 6/5/2017 'OT co'. �'RI R 5 04Fti Monticello Monthly Report 2017 Wright County Sheriff's Office Sheriff Joe Hagerty 3800 Braddock Ave. NE, Buffalo, MN 55313 1-800-362-3667 Fax:763-682-7610 QPpF ESSIONA�rS Printed on June 1, 2017 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 911 Hang-up Total: 46 05/01/1718:29 911 Hang-up 2017031153 911 05/02/1714:12 911 Hang-up 2017031318 911 05/02/1714:22 911 Hang-up 2017031325 911 05/02/1717:52 911 Hang-up 2017031388 911 05/02/1718:03 911 Hang-up 2017031390 911 05/03/17 00:23 911 Hang-up 2017031468 911 05/03/17 08:58 911 Hang-up 2017031520 911 05/03/1711:58 911 Hang-up 2017031564 911 05/03/1713:57 911 Hang-up 2017031593 911 05/04/17 06:28 911 Hang-up 2017031752 911 05/04/1713:09 911 Hang-up 2017031827 911 05/07/17 16:18 911 Hang-up 2017032715 911 05/08/1711:41 911 Hang-up 2017032899 911 05/08/17 17:09 911 Hang-up 2017032977 911 05/08/17 21:40 911 Hang-up 2017033040 911 05/12/1711:33 911 Hang-up 2017033948 911 05/12/1716:52 911 Hang-up 2017034027 911 05/12/17 19:57 911 Hang-up 2017034085 911 05/15/17 00:11 911 Hang-up 2017034661 911 05/16/1714:31 911 Hang-up 2017035033 911 05/18/17 04:31 911 Hang-up 2017035450 911 05/18/1711:26 911 Hang-up 2017035519 911 05/18/17 14:59 911 Hang-up 2017035568 911 05/18/17 21:35 911 Hang-up 2017035674 911 05/19/17 19:47 911 Hang-up 2017035964 911 05/20/1713:03 911 Hang-up 2017036092 911 05/21/1714:26 911 Hang-up 2017036283 911 05/23/1715:52 911 Hang-up 2017036806 911 05/24/17 20:20 911 Hang-up 2017037216 911 05/24/17 20:25 911 Hang-up 2017037219 911 05/26/1713:22 911 Hang-up 2017037670 911 05/26/1716:01 911 Hang-up 2017037702 911 05/26/1719:59 911 Hang-up 2017037781 911 05/26/17 20:57 911 Hang-up; Domestic 2017037804 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP17014992 911 05/27/17 07:47 911 Hang-up 2017037921 911 05/27/17 07:53 911 Hang-up 2017037923 911 05/27/17 14:47 911 Hang-up 2017038000 911 05/27/17 16:46 911 Hang-up 2017038044 911 05/29/17 17:46 911 Hang-up 2017038582 911 ZUERCHER Page 1 of 25 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 05/29/17 18:59 911 Hang-up 2017038605 911 05/29/17 19:48 911 Hang-up 2017038622 911 05/29/17 19:49 911 Hang-up 2017038623 911 05/30/1712:06 911 Hang-up 2017038754 911 05/30/1718:58 911 Hang-up 2017038876 911 05/30/17 22:51 911 Hang-up 2017038930 911 05/31/1717:41 911 Hang-up 2017039108 911 911 Open Line Total: 34 05/03/17 15:52 911 Open Line 2017031610 911 05/04/17 08:08 911 Open Line 2017031767 911 05/04/17 12:51 911 Open Line 2017031824 911 05/05/17 18:11 911 Open Line 2017032186 911 05/06/17 18:57 911 Open Line 2017032483 911 05/07/17 07:53 911 Open Line 2017032604 911 05/08/17 15:45 911 Open Line 2017032956 911 05/08/17 16:31 911 Open Line 2017032970 911 05/09/17 12:52 911 Open Line 2017033174 911 05/09/17 15:45 911 Open Line 2017033215 911 05/10/17 17:25 911 Open Line 2017033497 911 05/10/17 17:31 911 Open Line 2017033500 911 05/11/17 11:16 911 Open Line 2017033672 911 05/12/17 16:03 911 Open Line 2017034009 911 05/13/17 15:26 911 Open Line 2017034299 911 05/15/17 09:14 911 Open Line 2017034716 911 05/16/17 12:42 911 Open Line 2017035011 911 05/16/17 13:53 911 Open Line 2017035024 911 05/16/17 18:35 911 Open Line 2017035096 911 05/17/17 13:03 911 Open Line 2017035279 911 05/18/17 13:04 911 Open Line 2017035540 911 05/19/17 17:07 911 Open Line 2017035915 911 05/20/17 23:15 911 Open Line 2017036176 911 05/23/17 04:43 911 Open Line 2017036689 911 05/24/17 09:47 911 Open Line 2017037038 911 05/25/17 08:36 911 Open Line 2017037320 911 05/25/17 09:50 911 Open Line 2017037344 911 05/25/17 21:29 911 Open Line 2017037512 911 05/26/17 10:32 911 Open Line 2017037629 911 05/26/17 13:20 911 Open Line 2017037669 911 05/28/17 10:36 911 Open Line 2017038245 911 05/29/17 15:03 911 Open Line 2017038544 911 05/30/17 08:59 911 Open Line 2017038706 911 05/30/17 10:57 911 Open Line 2017038736 911 Abandoned Vehicle Total: 3 05/01/17 07:42 Abandoned Vehicle 2017030996 Abandoned Vehicle WCSOSR017012092 Phone 05/02/17 16:37 Abandoned Vehicle 2017031364 Abandoned Vehicle WCSOP17012229 Phone ZUERCHER Page 2 of 25 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 05/05/17 08:05 Abandoned Vehicle 2017032034 Abandoned Vehicle WCSOP17012541 Phone Abuse Total: 2 05/10/1711:18 Abuse 2017033418 Abuse WCSOP17013162 Phone 05/25/17 10:51 Abuse 2017037356 Check Welfare WCSOP17014800 Phone Agency Assist Total: 10 05/01/17 20:42 Agency Assist 2017031182 Agency Assist WCSOP17012167 Phone 05/05/17 17:02 Agency Assist 2017032172 Agency Assist WCSOP17012606 Phone 05/06/17 19:12 Agency Assist; Dispatch 2017032493 Agency Assist WCSOP17012756 Phone 05/08/17 11:04 Agency Assist 2017032891 Agency Assist WCSOP17012923 Phone 05/09/17 16:17 Agency Assist 2017033226 Agency Assist WCSOP17013070 Phone 05/16/17 15:30 Agency Assist 2017035049 Agency Assist WCSOP17013865 Phone 05/19/17 14:08 Agency Assist 2017035857 Agency Assist WCSOP17014213 Phone 05/22/17 11:49 Agency Assist 2017036492 Agency Assist WCSOP17014474 Phone 05/23/17 18:30 Agency Assist 2017036863 Agency Assist WCSOP17014625 Officer 05/27/17 14:10 Agency Assist 2017037987 Agency Assist WCSOP17015073 Phone Alarm Total: 3 05/16/17 05:13 Alarm 2017034929 Alarm WCSOP17013825 911 05/23/17 23:12 Alarm 2017036941 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP17014649 911 05/25/1711:28 Alarm 2017037364 Alarm WCSOP17014802 Phone Animal Total: 14 05/04/1712:18 Animal 2017031820 Phone 05/04/1718:38 Animal 2017031915 Phone 05/05/1719:58 Animal 2017032219 Animal WCSOP17012635 Phone 05/06/1713:49 Animal 2017032404 Animal WCSOP17012718 Phone 05/07/1713:21 Animal 2017032668 Phone 05/07/1715:23 Animal 2017032697 Animal WCSOP17012840 911 05/08/1712:01 Animal 2017032906 Animal WCSOP17012931 Phone 05/08/1713:41 Animal 2017032927 Phone 05/10/1719:18 Animal 2017033532 Animal WCSOP17013214 911 05/17/17 06:35 Animal 2017035200 Phone 05/20/1716:47 Animal 2017036114 Animal WCSOP17014321 Phone 05/21/17 09:53 Animal 2017036241 Phone 05/22/1716:04 Animal 2017036552 Animal WCSOP17014506 Phone 05/30/1717:37 Animal 2017038857 Animal WCSOP17015446 Phone Animal - Abuse Total: 1 05/06/17 10:38 Animal - Abuse 2017032348 Animal - Abuse WCSOP17012697 Phone Animal - Barking Dog Total: 2 05/25/17 16:46 Animal - Barking Dog 2017037442 Animal - Barking Dog WCSOP17014842 Phone 05/29/17 17:58 Animal - Barking Dog 2017038588 Animal - Barking Dog WCSOP17015337 Phone Animal - Bites - Attacks Total: 1 05/14/17 11:39 Animal - Bites - Attacks 2017034516 Animal - Bites - Attacks WCSOP17013639 Phone ZU=RCHER Page 3 of 25 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported Assault Total: 6 05/11/17 07:24 Assault 2017033619 Assault WCSOSR017013251 Phone 05/14/17 22:18 Assault 2017034642 Assault WCSOP17013704 Phone 05/18/17 14:33 Assault 2017035559 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP17014081 Phone 05/22/1716:57 Assault 2017036570 Assault WCSOP17014515 Phone 05/24/17 22:05 Assault 2017037248 Assault WCSOP17014767 Phone 05/26/17 09:00 Assault 2017037609 CSC Sex Offense WCSOP17014904 Phone Burglary Total: 3 Check Welfare 2017031839 Check Welfare WCSOP17012445 05/01/1714:55 Burglary 2017031093 Burglary WCSOP17012133 Phone 05/05/17 17:54 Burglary 2017032184 Residential Burglary WCSOP17012611 Phone 05/29/17 23:00 Burglary 2017038663 Commercial Burglary WCSOP17015364 911 Check Welfare Total: 30 05/01/17 14:53 Check Welfare 2017031091 Check Welfare WCSOP17012135 Phone 05/02/17 15:31 Check Welfare 2017031341 Check Welfare WCSOP17012221 Phone 05/03/17 16:35 Check Welfare 2017031620 Check Welfare WCSOP17012341 Phone 05/03/17 18:36 Check Welfare 2017031655 Check Welfare WCSOP17012363 Phone 05/03/17 20:50 Check Welfare 2017031684 Check Welfare WCSOP17012375 Phone 05/04/17 13:22 Check Welfare 2017031829 Check Welfare WCSOP17012440 Phone 05/04/17 14:15 Check Welfare 2017031839 Check Welfare WCSOP17012445 Phone 05/05/17 10:06 Check Welfare 2017032069 Check Welfare WCSOP17012555 Phone 05/05/17 20:03 Check Welfare 2017032221 Check Welfare WCSOP17012631 Phone 05/09/17 15:25 Check Welfare 2017033206 Death Investigation - Natural WCSOP17013061 Phone 05/09/17 19:08 Check Welfare 2017033278 Check Welfare WCSOP17013102 Phone 05/10/17 17:54 Check Welfare 2017033506 Check Welfare WCSOP17013206 Phone 05/12/17 05:44 Check Welfare 2017033879 Check Welfare WCSOP17013361 Phone 05/12/17 13:41 Check Welfare 2017033977 Check Welfare WCSOP17013407 Phone 05/12/17 16:09 Check Welfare 2017034015 Agency Assist WCSOP17013430 Phone 05/12/17 16:35 Check Welfare 2017034023 Check Welfare WCSOP17013434 Phone 05/12/17 16:45 Check Welfare 2017034026 Suicidal - Attempt - Threat WCSOP17013437 Phone 05/12/17 19:59 Check Welfare 2017034086 Check Welfare WCSOP17013464 911 05/13/17 09:47 Check Welfare 2017034220 Check Welfare WCSOP17013521 Phone 05/14/17 00:28 Check Welfare 2017034446 Check Welfare WCSOP17013613 Phone 05/16/17 01:02 Check Welfare 2017034914 Check Welfare WCSOP17013818 Phone 05/16/17 22:50 Check Welfare 2017035161 Check Welfare WCSOP17013915 Phone 05/17/17 17:39 Check Welfare 2017035340 Check Welfare WCSOP17013981 Phone 05/18/17 10:39 Check Welfare 2017035508 Check Welfare WCSOP17014055 Phone 05/19/17 17:33 Check Welfare 2017035919 Check Welfare WCSOP17014239 Phone 05/19/17 20:04 Check Welfare 2017035971 Check Welfare WCSOP17014255 Phone 05/20/17 18:25 Check Welfare 2017036135 Check Welfare WCSOP17014333 Phone 05/24/17 12:22 Check Welfare 2017037077 Check Welfare WCSOP17014692 Phone 05/28/17 18:46 Check Welfare 2017038367 Check Welfare WCSOP17015236 Phone 05/30/17 10:48 Check Welfare 2017038734 Check Welfare WCSOP17015394 Phone Citizen Aid Total: 9 05/07/17 13:00 Citizen Aid 2017032660 Citizen Aid WCSOP17012825 Phone 05/10/17 23:04 Citizen Aid 2017033578 Citizen Aid WCSOP17013235 Phone ZU=RCHER Page 4 of 25 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 05/11/17 11:37 Citizen Aid 2017033676 Citizen Aid WCSOP17013277 Phone 05/12/17 02:40 Citizen Aid 2017033869 Citizen Aid WCSOP17013355 Phone 05/12/17 11:33 Citizen Aid 2017033947 Drugs WCSOP17013390 Phone 05/15/17 06:52 Citizen Aid 2017034690 Citizen Aid WCSOP17013722 911 05/16/17 17:02 Citizen Aid 2017035072 Citizen Aid WCSOP17013874 Phone 05/19/17 14:50 Citizen Aid 2017035873 Citizen Aid WCSOP17014222 Phone 05/26/17 10:10 Citizen Aid; Dispatch - 2017037624 Citizen Aid WCSOP17014911 911 Civil Complaint Total: 21 05/02/17 18:07 Civil Complaint 2017031393 Civil Complaint WCSOP17012245 Phone 05/03/17 10:22 Civil Complaint 2017031539 Civil Complaint WCSOP17012305 Phone 05/03/17 13:20 Civil Complaint 2017031580 Civil Complaint WCSOP17012326 Phone 05/03/17 19:09 Civil Complaint 2017031662 Civil Complaint WCSOP17012365 Phone 05/04/17 11:25 Civil Complaint 2017031810 Civil Complaint WCSOP17012425 Phone 05/04/17 16:58 Civil Complaint 2017031884 Civil Child Custody WCSOP17012471 Phone 05/08/17 12:12 Civil Complaint 2017032910 Civil Process WCSOCVL17012932 Civil Process 05/08/17 15:36 Civil Complaint 2017032954 Civil Complaint WCSOP17012952 Phone 05/08/17 20:34 Civil Complaint 2017033027 Civil Complaint WCSOP17012989 Phone 05/10/17 12:08 Civil Complaint 2017033425 Civil Complaint WCSOP17013165 Phone 05/11/17 09:36 Civil Complaint 2017033646 Civil Complaint WCSOP17013263 Phone 05/13/17 13:37 Civil Complaint 2017034272 Civil Complaint WCSOP17013540 Phone 05/14/17 16:02 Civil Complaint 2017034564 Civil Complaint WCSOP17013668 911 05/15/17 12:01 Civil Complaint 2017034753 Civil Complaint WCSOP17013752 Phone 05/18/17 13:55 Civil Complaint 2017035552 Civil Complaint WCSOP17014078 Phone 05/18/17 21:59 Civil Complaint 2017035682 Civil Complaint WCSOP17014133 Phone 05/23/17 14:54 Civil Complaint 2017036790 Civil Complaint WCSOP17014587 Phone 05/24/17 15:33 Civil Complaint 2017037127 Civil Complaint WCSOP17014717 Phone 05/25/17 21:42 Civil Complaint 2017037519 Civil Complaint WCSOP17014869 Phone 05/27/17 13:20 Civil Complaint 2017037977 Civil Complaint WCSOP17015068 Phone 05/29/17 15:19 Civil Complaint 2017038549 Civil Complaint WCSOP17015320 Phone Civil Process Total: 53 05/01/17 09:37 Civil Process 2017031024 Officer 05/01/17 10:32 Civil Process 2017031036 Officer 05/01/17 15:48 Civil Process 2017031104 Officer 05/01/17 15:54 Civil Process 2017031106 Officer 05/01/17 16:51 Civil Process 2017031121 Officer 05/01/17 16:57 Civil Process 2017031126 Officer 05/01/17 17:00 Civil Process 2017031128 Officer 05/02/17 09:55 Civil Process 2017031273 Officer 05/02/17 14:21 Civil Process 2017031323 Officer 05/02/17 15:57 Civil Process 2017031351 Officer 05/03/17 09:02 Civil Process 2017031522 Officer 05/04/17 09:16 Civil Process 2017031778 Officer 05/09/17 10:11 Civil Process 2017033140 05/11/17 08:17 Civil Process 2017033631 Officer 05/11/17 08:27 Civil Process 2017033634 Officer ZUERCHER Page 5 of 25 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 05/11/17 08:46 Civil Process 2017033636 Officer 05/11/17 14:50 Civil Process 2017033709 05/11/17 16:13 Civil Process 2017033735 05/12/17 09:28 Civil Process 2017033917 Officer 05/16/17 16:14 Civil Process 2017035063 05/16/17 17:21 Civil Process 2017035078 Officer 05/16/17 20:06 Civil Process 2017035121 Civil Process WCSOP17013897 Phone 05/17/17 11:50 Civil Process; Dispatch 2017035264 Officer 05/18/17 10:16 Civil Process 2017035503 Officer 05/18/17 10:33 Civil Process 2017035507 05/18/17 17:24 Civil Process 2017035607 Officer 05/18/17 20:10 Civil Process 2017035655 Officer 05/18/17 22:39 Civil Process 2017035696 Officer 05/19/17 08:33 Civil Process 2017035773 Officer 05/19/17 09:04 Civil Process 2017035781 Officer 05/19/17 09:44 Civil Process 2017035789 Officer 05/19/17 09:47 Civil Process 2017035790 05/19/17 16:12 Civil Process; Dispatch 2017035903 Officer 05/19/17 16:31 Civil Process 2017035909 Officer 05/19/17 17:06 Civil Process 2017035914 Officer 05/19/17 17:38 Civil Process 2017035922 Officer 05/22/17 08:52 Civil Process 2017036462 Officer 05/22/17 16:34 Civil Process 2017036565 Officer 05/23/17 09:52 Civil Process 2017036723 Officer 05/23/17 10:36 Civil Process 2017036737 Officer 05/23/17 10:53 Civil Process 2017036743 Officer 05/24/17 08:48 Civil Process 2017037026 Officer 05/24/17 09:05 Civil Process 2017037029 Officer 05/24/17 09:19 Civil Process 2017037032 Officer 05/24/17 17:15 Civil Process 2017037171 Officer 05/26/17 12:18 Civil Process 2017037652 Officer 05/26/17 12:30 Civil Process 2017037656 Officer 05/30/17 12:44 Civil Process 2017038763 Officer 05/30/17 13:03 Civil Process 2017038767 Officer 05/31/17 09:00 Civil Process 2017038988 Officer 05/31/17 09:40 Civil Process 2017038998 Officer 05/31/17 09:52 Civil Process 2017039001 Officer 05/31/17 11:47 Civil Process 2017039022 Officer Commercial Fire Alarm Total: 5 05/18/17 08:40 Commercial Fire Alarm 2017035481 Commercial Fire Alarm WCSOP17014043 Phone 05/25/17 13:22 Commercial Fire Alarm 2017037390 Commercial Fire Alarm WCSOP17014811 Phone 05/26/17 10:49 Commercial Fire Alarm 2017037636 Commercial Fire Alarm WCSOP17014915 Phone 05/28/17 09:39 Commercial Fire Alarm 2017038237 Commercial Fire Alarm WCSOP17015177 Phone 05/29/17 17:51 Commercial Fire Alarm 2017038585 Commercial Fire Alarm WCSOP17015335 Phone Commercial General Alarm Total: 11 ZU=RCHER Page 6 of 25 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 05/01/17 01:40 Commercial General 2017030977 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP17012086 Phone 05/10/17 16:31 Commercial General 2017033483 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP17013195 Phone 05/11/17 23:10 Commercial General 2017033844 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP17013349 Phone 05/18/17 07:17 Commercial General 2017035464 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP17014033 Phone 05/20/17 18:57 Commercial General 2017036136 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP17014334 Phone 05/24/17 22:09 Commercial General 2017037249 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP17014766 Phone 05/28/17 05:44 Commercial General 2017038203 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP17015157 Phone 05/28/17 15:39 Commercial General 2017038313 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP17015216 Phone 05/29/17 01:27 Commercial General 2017038458 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP17015280 Phone 05/30/17 06:59 Commercial General 2017038695 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP17015379 Phone 05/31/17 22:22 Commercial General 2017039180 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP17015578 Phone Court Order Violation Total: 4 05/13/17 17:08 Court Order Violation 2017034323 Court Order Violation WCSOP17013566 Phone 05/23/17 10:14 Court Order Violation 2017036730 Court Order Violation WCSOP17014562 Phone 05/24/17 12:47 Court Order Violation 2017037085 Court Order Violation WCSOP17014702 Phone 05/31/17 11:20 Court Order Violation 2017039018 Court Order Violation WCSOP17015503 Phone Criminal Damage to Property Total: 9 05/05/17 09:12 Criminal Damage to 2017032043 Criminal Damage to Property WCSOP17012549 Phone 05/08/17 14:53 Criminal Damage to 2017032941 Criminal Damage to Property WCSOSR017012947 Disorderly 05/11/17 10:53 Criminal Damage to 2017033666 Criminal Damage to Property WCSOP17013273 Phone 05/13/17 10:41 Criminal Damage to 2017034235 Civil Complaint WCSOP17013530 Phone 05/18/17 08:08 Criminal Damage to 2017035472 Criminal Damage to Property WCSOP17014037 05/14/1714:40 05/19/17 12:07 Criminal Damage to 2017035826 Criminal Damage to Property WCSOP17014190 Phone 05/22/17 07:59 Criminal Damage to 2017036452 Criminal Damage to Property WCSOP17014455 Phone 05/22/17 20:12 Criminal Damage to 2017036618 Criminal Damage to Property WCSOP17014531 Phone 05/28/17 23:51 Criminal Damage to 2017038442 Juvenile - Curfew Violation WCSOP17015274 911 CSC Sex Offense Total: 2 05/04/17 03:21 05/05/17 08:17 CSC Sex Offense 2017032035 CSC Sex Offense WCSOP17012543 Phone 05/12/17 13:10 CSC Sex Offense 2017033972 CSC Sex Offense WCSOSR017013402 WCSOP17012849 Disabled Vehicle Total: 2 05/09/17 08:59 Disabled Vehicle 2017033123 Disabled Vehicle WCSOP17013019 Phone 05/28/17 11:34 Disabled Vehicle 2017038259 Disabled Vehicle WCSOP17015186 Phone Disorderly Total: 7 05/02/1717:12 Disorderly 2017031377 Disorderly WCSOP17012238 Phone 05/03/17 09:58 Disorderly 2017031533 Disorderly WCSOSR017012302 05/10/1719:03 Disorderly 2017033526 Disorderly WCSOP17013210 Phone 05/14/1711:25 Disorderly 2017034514 Disorderly WCSOP17013637 Phone 05/14/1714:40 Disorderly 2017034545 Disorderly WCSOP17013657 Phone 05/19/1713:59 Disorderly 2017035853 Assault WCSOSR017014210 05/28/17 22:59 Disorderly 2017038428 Disorderly WCSOP17015268 911 Domestic Disturbance Total: 17 05/04/17 03:21 Domestic Disturbance 2017031740 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP17012396 Phone 05/07/17 16:21 Domestic Disturbance 2017032716 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP17012849 Phone ZUERCHER Page 7 of 25 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 05/13/17 14:57 Domestic Disturbance 2017034289 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP17013549 Phone 05/17/17 01:20 Domestic Disturbance 2017035179 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP17013925 Phone 05/19/17 15:53 Domestic Disturbance 2017035898 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP17014229 911 05/20/17 11:10 Domestic Disturbance 2017036073 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP17014301 911 05/20/17 12:47 Domestic Disturbance 2017036090 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP17014307 Phone 05/20/17 15:45 Domestic Disturbance 2017036104 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP17014315 911 05/21/17 13:39 Domestic Disturbance 2017036274 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP17014391 Phone 05/23/17 19:03 Domestic Disturbance 2017036876 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP17014631 Phone 05/25/17 00:00 Domestic Disturbance 2017037268 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP17014773 Phone 05/25/17 10:43 Domestic Disturbance 2017037355 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP17014797 Phone 05/25/17 16:20 Domestic Disturbance 2017037439 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP17014833 Phone 05/25/17 18:27 Domestic Disturbance 2017037466 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP17014852 Phone 05/29/17 01:03 Domestic Disturbance 2017038454 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP17015279 Phone 05/29/17 21:58 Domestic Disturbance 2017038651 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP17015359 911 05/31/17 12:11 Domestic Disturbance 2017039025 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP17015507 Phone Drugs Total: 4 05/09/1711:53 Drugs 2017033164 Drugs WCSOP17013035 Phone 05/13/1717:01 Drugs 2017034321 Drugs WCSOP17013563 05/22/17 20:57 Drugs 2017036626 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17014534 Phone 05/26/17 09:42 Drugs 2017037615 Drugs WCSOSR017014907 Dumping Total: 1 05/19/1710:40 Dumping 2017035807 Dumping WCSOP17014181 Phone Extra Patrol Total: 2 05/05/17 14:39 Extra Patrol 2017032128 Extra Patrol WCSOP17012582 Phone 05/12/17 10:20 Extra Patrol 2017033932 Phone Fight Total: 1 05/12/1713:37 Fight 2017033976 Fight WCSOP17013406 Phone Fire - Gas Leak Total: 2 05/28/17 08:03 Fire - Gas Leak 2017038225 Fire - Gas Leak WCSOP17015172 Phone 05/31/17 08:01 Fire - Gas Leak 2017038978 Fire - Gas Leak WCSOP17015487 Phone Fire - Other Total: 2 05/08/17 16:36 Fire - Other 2017032971 Fire - Other WCSOP17012964 Phone 05/18/17 22:00 Fire - Other 2017035683 Fire - Other WCSOP17014132 Phone Fire - Smoke - Odor Total: 2 05/28/17 10:07 Fire - Smoke - Odor 2017038241 Fire - Smoke - Odor WCSOP17015179 911 05/30/17 10:01 Fire - Smoke - Odor 2017038723 Fire - Smoke - Odor WCSOP17015388 911 Fireworks Total: 1 05/13/17 21:33 Fireworks 2017034402 Fireworks WCSOP17013596 Phone Fraud - Checks - Cards Total: 3 05/01/17 12:30 Fraud - Checks - Cards 2017031058 Counterfeit Currency WCSOP17012116 Phone 05/13/17 17:29 Fraud - Checks - Cards 2017034331 Counterfeit Currency WCSOP17013567 911 ZUERCHER Page 8 of 25 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 05/16/17 19:08 Fraud - Checks - Cards 2017035108 Suspicious -Circumstances WCSOP17013890 Phone Fraud - Forgery Total: 2 05/15/17 15:00 Fraud - Forgery 2017034786 Fraud - Forgery WCSOP17013766 Phone 05/26/17 07:49 Fraud - Forgery 2017037595 Fraud - Forgery WCSOP17014896 Phone Fraud - Internet Total: 1 05/15/17 12:20 Fraud - Internet 2017034756 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17013753 Phone Funeral Escort Total: 2 05/08/17 09:42 Funeral Escort 2017032873 Phone 05/13/17 12:49 Funeral Escort 2017034260 Phone Harassment Total: 9 05/04/1716:31 Harassment 2017031875 Harassment WCSOP17012465 Phone 05/05/17 21:58 Harassment 2017032242 Harassment WCSOP17012642 911 05/18/1718:03 Harassment 2017035623 Harassment WCSOP17014110 Phone 05/22/1713:43 Harassment 2017036520 Harassment WCSOP17014490 Phone 05/22/17 20:02 Harassment 2017036615 Harassment WCSOP17014528 Phone 05/25/1713:49 Harassment 2017037396 Harassment WCSOSRO17014812 05/25/17 20:30 Harassment 2017037495 Harassment WCSOP17014860 Phone 05/26/1710:42 Harassment 2017037633 Harassment WCSOP17014914 Phone 05/26/17 21:52 Harassment 2017037827 Harassment WCSOP17014997 Phone Hospice Death Total: 2 05/05/17 16:00 Hospice Death 2017032160 Phone 05/27/17 19:17 Hospice Death 2017038086 Phone Info Total: 9 05/12/17 07:24 Info 2017033890 Squad Damage WCSOP17013366 Phone 05/15/17 16:17 Info 2017034805 Squad Damage WCSOP17013776 05/19/17 11:36 Info 2017035818 Phone 05/22/17 04:35 Info 2017036431 Info WCSOP17014445 Phone 05/23/17 21:21 Info 2017036915 Phone 05/28/17 15:40 Info 2017038316 Phone 05/30/17 11:43 Info 2017038747 911 05/30/1716:29 Info 2017038830 Info WCSOP17015436 Phone 05/31/17 15:21 Info 2017039064 Phone Intoxicated Person Total: 4 05/01/17 18:26 Intoxicated Person 2017031149 Intoxicated Person WCSOP17012151 Phone 05/07/17 20:32 Intoxicated Person 2017032769 Intoxicated Person WCSOP17012869 Phone 05/08/17 14:57 Intoxicated Person 2017032943 DUI WCSOP17012949 Phone 05/23/17 23:03 Intoxicated Person 2017036938 Intoxicated Person WCSOP17014647 Phone Juvenile - Complaint Total: 21 05/01/17 08:18 Juvenile - Complaint 2017031006 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP17012098 Phone 05/02/17 07:19 Juvenile - Complaint 2017031243 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP17012186 Phone 05/03/17 17:48 Juvenile - Complaint 2017031639 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP17012351 Phone 05/05/17 09:15 Juvenile - Complaint 2017032044 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP17012546 Phone ZUERCHER Page 9 of 25 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call 05/08/17 06:52 05/08/17 11:04 05/09/17 07:12 05/09/17 13:47 05/13/17 21:57 05/15/17 06:44 05/15/17 10:20 05/15/17 13:20 05/15/17 20:21 05/17/17 06:35 05/19/17 21:16 05/22/17 20:23 05/23/17 06:46 05/23/17 17:19 05/24/17 09:53 05/27/17 02:24 05/27/17 04:52 Juvenile - Complaint Juvenile - Complaint Juvenile - Complaint Juvenile - Complaint Juvenile - Complaint Juvenile - Complaint Juvenile - Complaint Juvenile - Complaint Juvenile - Complaint Juvenile - Complaint Juvenile - Complaint Juvenile - Complaint Juvenile - Complaint Juvenile - Complaint Juvenile - Complaint Juvenile - Complaint Juvenile - Complaint Juvenile - Runaway Total: 2 05/13/17 22:21 Juvenile - Runaway 05/22/17 19:02 Juvenile - Runaway Lost - Found Property Total: 12 CFS # Final Incident 2017032830 Juvenile - Complaint 2017032892 Juvenile - Complaint 2017033103 Juvenile - Complaint 2017033183 Juvenile - Complaint 2017034410 Juvenile - Complaint 2017034688 Juvenile - Complaint 2017034734 Juvenile - Complaint 2017034769 Juvenile - Complaint 2017034862 Juvenile - Runaway 2017035199 Juvenile - Complaint 2017035988 Juvenile - Complaint 2017036623 Juvenile - Complaint 2017036698 Juvenile - Complaint 2017036848 Juvenile - Complaint 2017037043 CSC Sex Offense 2017037900 Juvenile - Complaint 2017037909 Juvenile - Complaint 2017034416 Juvenile - Complaint 2017036602 Juvenile - Runaway Case Number WCS0P17012896 WCS0P17012924 WCS0P17013012 WCS0SRO17013048 WCS0P17013599 WCS0P17013721 WCS0SRO17013742 WCS0SRO17013758 WCS0P17013805 WCS0P17013932 WCS0P17014263 WCS0P17014532 WCS0P17014552 WCS0P17014616 WCS0SRO17014675 WCS0P17015027 WCS0P17015031 How Reported 911 Phone Phone Phone Phone Phone Phone Phone Phone Phone Phone 911 Phone WCS0P17013600 Phone WCS0P17014524 911 05/01/17 10:16 Lost - Found Property 2017031034 Lost - Found Property WCS0P17012104 05/03/17 15:27 Lost - Found Property 2017031608 Lost - Found Property WCS0P17012337 05/04/17 14:55 Lost - Found Property 2017031850 Lost - Found Property WCS0P17012452 05/07/17 16:17 Lost - Found Property 2017032714 Lost - Found Property WCS0P17012850 05/08/17 07:57 Lost - Found Property 2017032841 Lost - Found Property WCS0P17012903 05/13/17 11:52 Lost - Found Property 2017034250 Drugs WCS0P17013533 05/16/17 07:39 Lost - Found Property 2017034950 Lost - Found Property WCS0P17013831 05/17/17 10:39 Lost - Found Property 2017035250 Lost - Found Property WCS0P17013952 05/19/17 04:38 Lost - Found Property 2017035733 Lost - Found Property WCS0P17014155 05/20/17 09:36 Lost - Found Property 2017036064 Lost - Found Property WCS0P17014295 05/22/17 16:40 Lost - Found Property 2017036567 Lost - Found Property WCS0P17014514 05/30/17 13:25 Lost - Found Property 2017038771 Lost - Found Property WCS0P17015407 Medical - Abdominal Pain Total: 3 05/07/17 16:12 Medical - Abdominal 2017032711 Medical - Abdominal Pain WCS0P17012847 05/08/17 17:09 Medical - Abdominal 2017032978 Medical - Abdominal Pain WCS0P17012968 05/25/17 02:53 Medical - Abdominal 2017037284 Medical - Abdominal Pain WCS0P17014775 Medical - Bleeding - Lacerations Total: 5 05/13/17 15:13 Medical - Bleeding - 2017034296 05/20/17 03:51 Medical - Bleeding - 2017036038 05/22/17 22:56 Medical - Bleeding - 2017036657 Medical - Bleeding - WCS0P17014540 05/25/17 18:40 Medical - Bleeding - 2017037470 05/26/17 08:04 Medical - Bleeding - 2017037602 Medical - Bleeding - WCS0P17014899 Phone Phone 911 911 911 911 911 Phone ZUERCHER Page 10 of 25 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported Medical - Breathing Problems Total: 4 05/08/17 04:18 Medical - Breathing 2017032819 2017030990 911 05/12/17 07:27 Medical - Breathing 2017033891 Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP17013367 911 05/14/17 12:10 Medical - Breathing 2017034521 Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP17013642 911 05/18/17 23:28 Medical - Breathing 2017035707 Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP17014145 911 Medical - Chest Pain Total: 2 Phone 05/07/17 22:21 Medical - Fall Under 6 05/29/17 15:03 Medical - Chest Pain 2017038543 Medical - Chest Pain WCSOP17015317 911 05/31/17 18:11 Medical - Chest Pain 2017039118 Medical - Chest Pain WCSOP17015544 Phone Medical - Choking Total: 1 911 05/11/17 15:34 Medical - Fall Under 6 05/04/17 19:10 Medical - Choking 2017031922 Medical - Choking WCSOP17012493 Phone Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet Total: 16 05/01/17 07:08 Medical - Fall Under 6 2017030990 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP17012090 Phone 05/03/17 22:23 Medical - Fall Under 6 2017031703 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP17012381 911 05/06/17 13:08 Medical - Fall Under 6 2017032387 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP17012710 Phone 05/07/17 22:21 Medical - Fall Under 6 2017032782 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP17012875 911 05/08/17 02:17 Medical - Fall Under 6 2017032817 Citizen Aid WCSOP17012891 911 05/11/17 15:34 Medical - Fall Under 6 2017033718 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP17013294 911 05/11/17 17:28 Medical - Fall Under 6 2017033762 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP17013310 Phone 05/12/17 11:48 Medical - Fall Under 6 2017033953 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP17013394 Phone 05/14/17 19:00 Medical - Fall Under 6 2017034602 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP17013689 911 05/17/17 18:01 Medical - Fall Under 6 2017035350 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP17013983 Phone 05/18/17 05:51 Medical - Fall Under 6 2017035454 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP17014026 911 05/21/17 15:48 Medical - Fall Under 6 2017036299 Medical - Unconscious - WCSOP17014402 Phone 05/26/17 06:39 Medical - Fall Under 6 2017037588 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP17014891 911 05/26/17 14:59 Medical - Fall Under 6 2017037690 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP17014946 Phone 05/27/17 17:00 Medical - Fall Under 6 2017038051 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP17015099 Phone 05/31/17 16:56 Medical - Fall Under 6 2017039096 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP17015535 Phone Medical - Non Emergency Transport Total: 1 05/31/17 10:38 Medical - Non 2017039009 Medical - Non Emergency WCSOSRO17015500 Phone Medical - Psychiatric - Behavioral Total: 8 05/03/17 05:17 Medical - Psychiatric - 2017031485 Medical - Psychiatric - WCSOP17012282 911 05/06/17 20:51 Medical - Psychiatric - 2017032515 Medical - Psychiatric - WCSOP17012765 911 05/08/17 16:10 Medical - Psychiatric - 2017032965 Medical - Psychiatric - WCSOP17012959 Phone 05/13/17 21:13 Medical - Psychiatric - 2017034396 Medical - Psychiatric - WCSOP17013594 911 05/17/17 18:20 Medical - Psychiatric - 2017035361 Suicidal - Attempt - Threat WCSOP17013990 Phone 05/23/17 18:41 Medical - Psychiatric - 2017036869 Suicidal - Attempt - Threat WCSOP17014628 Phone 05/24/17 22:18 Medical - Psychiatric - 2017037252 Medical - Psychiatric - WCSOP17014768 911 05/30/17 11:07 Medical - Psychiatric - 2017038739 Medical - Psychiatric - WCSOP17015395 Phone Medical - Seizure Total: 4 05/19/17 13:44 Medical - Seizure 2017035851 Medical - Seizure WCSOP17014206 911 05/20/17 16:13 Medical - Seizure 2017036110 Medical - Seizure WCSOP17014318 911 05/23/17 16:57 Medical - Seizure 2017036836 Medical - Seizure WCSOP17014609 911 05/31/17 09:17 Medical - Seizure 2017038992 Medical - Seizure WCSOSRO17015493 911 ZUERCHER Page 11 of 25 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported Medical - Sick Total: 8 05/03/17 21:16 Medical - Sick 2017031694 Medical - Sick WCSOP17012377 Phone 05/05/17 20:56 Medical - Sick 2017032233 911 05/10/17 14:49 Medical - Sick 2017033457 Medical - Sick WCSOP17013179 911 05/10/17 17:44 Medical - Sick 2017033504 911 05/14/17 09:46 Medical - Sick 2017034497 Medical - Sick WCSOP17013630 911 05/17/17 13:29 Medical - Sick 2017035286 Medical - Sick WCSOP17013963 911 05/19/17 15:57 Medical - Sick 2017035899 911 05/30/17 14:37 Medical - Sick 2017038790 Medical - Sick WCSOP17015416 911 Medical - Trauma Total: 1 05/16/17 13:37 Medical - Trauma 2017035021 Medical - Trauma WCSOP17013854 911 Medical - Unconscious - Fainting Total: 9 05/12/17 06:36 Medical - Unconscious - 2017033883 Medical - Unconscious - WCSOP17013363 Phone 05/13/17 05:23 Medical - Unconscious - 2017034180 Death Investigation - WCSOP17013504 Phone 05/21/17 12:28 Medical - Unconscious - 2017036263 Medical - Unconscious - WCSOP17014387 Phone 05/25/17 18:47 Medical - Unconscious - 2017037472 Medical - Unconscious - WCSOP17014853 911 05/27/17 02:21 Medical - Unconscious - 2017037899 Medical - Unconscious - WCSOP17015022 Phone 05/27/17 06:03 Medical - Unconscious - 2017037910 Medical - Unconscious - WCSOP17015032 911 05/29/17 18:37 Medical - Unconscious - 2017038598 Medical - Unconscious - WCSOP17015345 Phone 05/29/17 19:48 Medical - Unconscious - 2017038621 Medical - Unconscious - WCSOP17015354 911 05/30/17 19:00 Medical - Unconscious - 2017038879 Medical - Unconscious - WCSOP17015455 Phone Medical - Unknown Total: 6 05/05/17 19:06 Medical - Unknown 2017032201 Medical - Unknown WCSOP17012618 911 05/09/17 18:00 Medical - Unknown 2017033257 Medical - Unknown WCSOP17013086 Phone 05/13/17 01:31 Medical - Unknown 2017034160 Medical - Unknown WCSOP17013496 Phone 05/15/17 00:07 Medical - Unknown 2017034660 Medical - Unknown WCSOP17013709 Phone 05/15/17 21:39 Medical - Unknown 2017034882 Medical - Unknown WCSOP17013808 911 05/24/17 09:55 Medical - Unknown 2017037044 Medical - Unknown WCSOP17014676 911 Missing Person Total: 5 05/01/17 19:52 Missing Person 2017031170 Missing Person WCSOP17012163 Phone 05/14/17 14:51 Missing Person 2017034550 Missing Person WCSOP17013661 Phone 05/15/17 09:38 Missing Person 2017034722 Missing Person WCSOP17013735 Phone 05/21/17 19:24 Missing Person 2017036359 Missing Person WCSOP17014422 Phone 05/23/17 07:32 Missing Person 2017036705 Juvenile - Runaway WCSOP17014554 Phone Motorist Aid Total: 5 05/01/1713:00 Motorist Aid 2017031065 Phone 05/02/17 08:09 Motorist Aid 2017031253 Phone 05/24/17 16:37 Motorist Aid 2017037152 911 05/24/17 19:01 Motorist Aid 2017037194 Officer 05/31/17 15:28 Motorist Aid 2017039066 Officer MVA - Car Deer Total: 1 05/18/17 05:47 MVA - Car Deer 2017035453 Phone ZU=RCHER Page 12 of 25 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported MVA - Hit & Run Total: 1 WCSOP17012293 05/04/17 22:11 MVA - No Injuries 05/18/17 20:42 MVA - Hit & Run 2017035665 MVA - Hit & Run WCSOP17014128 MVA - Injuries Total: 3 MVA - No Injuries 2017032057 MVA - No Injuries 05/17/17 13:25 MVA - Injuries 2017035284 MVA - Injuries WCSOP17013961 05/27/17 10:02 MVA - Injuries 2017037947 MVA - Injuries WCSOP17015049 05/30/17 14:27 MVA - Injuries 2017038787 2017032901 MVA - No Injuries MVA - No Injuries Total: 23 05/01/17 15:52 MVA - No Injuries 2017031105 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP17012141 WCSOP17012293 05/04/17 22:11 MVA - No Injuries 2017031964 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP17012514 Dispute 05/05/17 09:34 MVA - No Injuries 2017032057 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP17012554 Neighborhood 05/05/17 13:51 MVA - No Injuries 2017032117 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP17012575 2017034269 05/08/17 11:48 MVA - No Injuries 2017032901 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP17012927 Dispute 05/08/17 16:22 MVA - No Injuries 2017032967 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP17012961 Neighborhood 05/08/17 16:55 MVA - No Injuries 2017032976 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP17012966 05/28/17 11:14 05/08/17 17:27 MVA - No Injuries 2017032985 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP17012971 911 05/09/17 15:48 MVA - No Injuries 2017033217 Agency Assist WCSOP17013063 Dispute 05/10/17 12:15 MVA - No Injuries 2017033427 05/12/17 16:41 MVA - No Injuries 2017034025 DUI WCSOP17013435 05/18/17 09:59 MVA - No Injuries 2017035498 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP17014048 05/20/17 17:49 MVA - No Injuries 2017036124 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP17014325 05/21/17 17:07 MVA - No Injuries 2017036322 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP17014408 05/22/17 14:10 MVA - No Injuries 2017036524 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP17014492 05/24/17 12:29 MVA - No Injuries 2017037080 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP17014693 05/24/17 16:13 MVA - No Injuries 2017037145 MVA - Injuries WCSOP17014726 05/25/17 15:59 MVA - No Injuries 2017037430 Agency Assist WCSOP17014830 911 05/25/17 17:28 MVA - No Injuries 2017037452 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP17014840 911 05/26/17 11:37 MVA - No Injuries 2017037647 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP17014919 05/26/17 14:23 MVA - No Injuries 2017037684 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP17014943 05/26/17 22:05 MVA - No Injuries 2017037835 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP17015000 911 05/30/17 17:00 MVA - No Injuries 2017038845 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP17015440 Neighborhood Dispute Total: 8 05/03/17 08:10 Neighborhood Dispute 2017031512 Medical - Psychiatric - WCSOP17012293 05/03/17 17:26 Neighborhood Dispute 2017031631 Neighborhood Dispute WCSOP17012346 05/13/17 09:19 Neighborhood Dispute 2017034215 Neighborhood Dispute WCSOP17013519 05/13/17 13:27 Neighborhood Dispute 2017034269 Neighborhood Dispute WCSOP17013539 05/19/17 11:41 Neighborhood Dispute 2017035821 Neighborhood Dispute WCSOP17014192 05/19/17 19:36 Neighborhood Dispute 2017035959 Neighborhood Dispute WCSOP17014252 05/28/17 11:14 Neighborhood Dispute 2017038254 Neighborhood Dispute WCSOP17015184 05/30/17 15:46 Neighborhood Dispute 2017038809 Neighborhood Dispute WCSOP17015424 Noise Total: 8 05/04/1718:24 Noise 2017031913 Noise WCSOP17012485 05/06/17 09:48 Noise 2017032342 Noise WCSOP17012693 05/07/1712:15 Noise 2017032650 Noise WCSOP17012821 05/10/17 03:31 Noise 2017033355 Noise WCSOP17013134 ZURRICHER Page 13 of 25 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 05/13/1717:33 Noise 2017034332 Noise WCSOP17013573 05/27/17 01:54 Noise 2017037895 Noise WCSOP17015021 05/27/17 02:03 Noise 2017037897 Noise WCSOP17015025 05/27/17 22:56 Noise 2017038157 Noise WCSOP17015134 Off -Road Vehicle Complaint Total: 2 05/20/17 09:50 05/14/17 16:13 Off -Road Vehicle 2017034566 Off -Road Vehicle Complaint WCSOP17013670 Phone 05/18/17 08:03 Off -Road Vehicle 2017035469 Off -Road Vehicle Complaint WCSOP17014035 Open Door - Window Total: 3 05/09/17 00:49 Open Door - Window 2017033071 Open Door - Window WCSOP17013001 05/27/17 01:53 Open Door - Window 2017037894 Open Door - Window WCSOP17015018 05/28/17 20:14 Open Door - Window 2017038384 Open Door - Window WCSOP17015245 Ordinance Violation Total: 6 05/05/17 13:51 Ordinance Violation 05/15/17 16:49 Ordinance Violation 05/23/17 15:38 Ordinance Violation 05/27/17 14:05 Ordinance Violation 05/28/17 14:19 Ordinance Violation 05/31/17 15:34 Ordinance Violation Parking Total: 12 05/03/17 07:26 Phone Call Parking; Abandoned 05/03/1712:42 05/13/17 15:14 Parking 05/03/1712:44 Phone Call Parking 05/03/1712:55 Parking 05/08/1712:23 Parking 05/12/1712:33 Parking 05/13/17 07:05 Parking 05/17/1718:35 Parking 05/18/1714:17 Parking 05/20/17 09:50 Parking 05/23/1715:54 Parking 05/24/1713:21 Parking Phone Call Total: 5 05/02/17 19:53 Phone Call 05/07/17 13:30 Phone Call 05/13/17 15:14 Phone Call 05/18/17 13:24 Phone Call 05/18/17 17:05 Phone Call Probation Check Total: 1 05/08/17 17:44 Probation Check Repossession Total: 2 05/08/17 23:08 Repossession 05/24/1719:26 Repossession 2017032118 2017034816 2017036799 2017037986 2017038295 2017039069 2017031497 2017031571 2017031572 2017031576 2017032914 2017033962 2017034190 2017035367 2017035556 2017036066 2017036808 2017037089 2017031421 2017032670 2017034297 2017035546 2017035604 2017032990 2017033053 2017037198 Ordinance Violation Ordinance Violation Ordinance Violation Ordinance Violation Ordinance Violation Ordinance Violation Parking Parking Parking Parking Parking Parking Parking Parking Parking Parking Ordinance Violation Parking Phone Call WCSOP17012574 WCSOP17013780 WCSOP17014592 WCSOP17015072 WCSOP17015208 WCSOP17015528 WCSOP17012287 WCSOP17012321 WCSOP17012325 WCSOP17012323 WCSOP17012933 WCSOP17013398 WCSOP17013510 WCSOP17013996 WCSOP17014080 WCSOP17014296 WCSOP17014593 WCSOP17014703 U��NLY�]'Ji �LIy P�:iCi Other Other Other Other Other Officer ZUERCHER Page 14 of 25 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Residential General Alarm Total: 7 05/08/17 18:20 SIA Door Check Residential General 2017032997 05/11/17 08:22 2017036937 Residential General 2017033632 05/11/17 09:21 05/26/17 00:08 Residential General 2017033643 05/18/17 08:51 SIA Door Check Residential General 2017035485 05/27/17 11:58 2017037570 Residential General 2017037967 05/28/17 18:26 SIA Other Total: 3 Residential General 2017038360 05/31/17 17:52 2017031476 Residential General 2017039110 Residential Medical Alarm Total: 3 05/02/17 08:33 2017035169 Residential Medical 2017031256 05/08/17 01:22 Residential Medical 2017032813 05/28/17 07:48 Residential Medical 2017038223 SIA Business Walk Through Total: 2 05/12/17 02:35 SIA Business Walk 2017033868 05/28/17 06:03 SIA Business Walk 2017038208 SIA City Council - City Hall Total: 1 05/11/17 10:35 SIA City Council - City 2017033662 05/10/17 01:35 SIA Door Check 2017033349 05/23/17 23:01 SIA Door Check 2017036937 05/25/17 23:52 SIA Door Check 2017037546 05/26/17 00:08 SIA Door Check 2017037550 05/26/17 00:19 SIA Door Check 2017037552 05/26/17 02:50 SIA Door Check 2017037570 SIA Foot Patrol Total: 7 05/04/17 02:15 SIA Foot Patrol 2017031734 05/10/17 17:46 SIA Foot Patrol 2017033505 05/19/17 02:06 SIA Foot Patrol 2017035726 05/22/17 02:15 SIA Foot Patrol 2017036430 05/24/17 02:14 SIA Foot Patrol 2017036977 05/26/17 02:07 SIA Foot Patrol 2017037567 05/31/17 23:57 SIA Foot Patrol 2017039195 SIA Other Total: 3 WCSOP17015540 05/03/17 02:01 SIA Other 2017031476 05/09/17 00:33 SIA Other 2017033068 05/16/17 23:55 SIA Other 2017035169 SIA Parks Total: 4 05/17/17 09:18 SIA Parks 2017035227 05/21/17 08:58 SIA Parks 2017036230 05/26/1710:07 SIA Parks 2017037623 05/27/17 07:31 SIA Parks 2017037916 Final Incident Case Number How Reported Residential General Alarm WCSOP17012974 Phone Residential General Alarm WCSOP17013254 Phone Residential General Alarm WCSOP17013262 Phone Residential General Alarm WCSOP17014045 Phone Phone Residential General Alarm WCSOP17015234 Phone Residential General Alarm WCSOP17015540 Phone Residential Medical Alarm WCSOP17012192 Phone Phone Medical - Unknown WCSOP17015168 Phone Warrant - Arrest WCSOP17013202 Officer Officer Officer Officer ZU=RCHER Page 15 of 25 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Sign - Light Repair Total: 1 05/29/17 14:46 Sign - Light Repair 2017038536 Soliciting Total: 1 05/16/1717:28 Soliciting 2017035080 Soliciting Stoparm Violation Total: 1 05/04/17 11:09 Stoparm Violation 2017031803 Stoparm Violation Surveillance Total: 1 05/23/17 04:43 Surveillance 2017036690 Suspicious - Circumstances Total: 28 Case Number How Reported Phone WCSOP17013878 Phone WCSOP17012421 Other 05/01/17 12:18 Suspicious - 2017031057 Theft WCSOP17012124 Phone 05/04/17 23:32 Suspicious - 2017031988 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP17012522 Phone 05/06/17 01:23 Suspicious - 2017032279 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17012661 Phone 05/06/17 01:56 Suspicious - 2017032289 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17012664 05/06/17 02:41 Suspicious - 2017032295 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17012667 Phone 05/07/17 21:48 Suspicious - 2017032781 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17012874 Phone 05/08/17 15:52 Suspicious - 2017032959 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17012955 Phone 05/09/17 16:28 Suspicious - 2017033228 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17013072 Phone 05/11/17 14:17 Suspicious - 2017033703 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17013287 Phone 05/11/17 21:52 Suspicious - 2017033826 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17013338 911 05/13/17 13:18 Suspicious - 2017034266 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17013537 Phone 05/13/17 19:34 Suspicious - 2017034369 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17013579 Phone 05/14/17 10:17 Suspicious - 2017034502 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17013633 Phone 05/18/17 03:10 Suspicious - 2017035444 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17014022 Phone 05/20/17 10:56 Suspicious - 2017036072 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17014300 Phone 05/23/17 10:23 Suspicious - 2017036735 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17014563 Phone 05/24/17 01:44 Suspicious - 2017036974 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17014657 Phone 05/24/17 10:14 Suspicious - 2017037051 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17014680 Phone 05/24/17 14:24 Suspicious - 2017037105 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17014711 Phone 05/24/17 16:33 Suspicious - 2017037150 Civil Complaint WCSOP17014734 Phone 05/25/17 08:43 Suspicious - 2017037322 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17014791 Phone 05/25/17 09:11 Suspicious - 2017037332 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17014792 Phone 05/25/17 18:26 Suspicious - 2017037464 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17014851 Phone 05/26/17 07:11 Suspicious - 2017037591 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17014893 Phone 05/30/17 00:02 Suspicious - 2017038672 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17015370 Phone 05/30/17 11:35 Suspicious - 2017038744 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17015399 Phone 05/30/17 11:44 Suspicious - 2017038749 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17015401 Phone 05/31/17 21:55 Suspicious - 2017039177 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP17015577 Phone Suspicious - Item Total: 1 05/20/17 07:44 Suspicious - Item 2017036050 Suspicious - Item WCSOP17014289 Phone Suspicious - Person - Vehicle Total: 14 05/01/17 15:12 Suspicious - Person - 2017031096 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP17012136 Phone 05/04/17 20:09 Suspicious - Person - 2017031938 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP17012499 Phone 05/07/17 08:27 Suspicious - Person - 2017032608 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP17012804 ZU=RCHER Page 16 of 25 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 05/09/17 19:27 Suspicious - Person - 2017033284 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP17013107 Phone 05/10/17 23:44 Suspicious - Person - 2017033587 Disorderly WCSOP17013240 Phone 05/16/17 23:04 Suspicious - Person - 2017035164 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP17013918 911 05/17/17 00:54 Suspicious - Person - 2017035174 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP17013922 911 05/19/17 20:08 Suspicious - Person - 2017035972 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP17014256 Phone 05/20/17 14:03 Suspicious - Person - 2017036095 Unwanted Person WCSOP17014311 Phone 05/21/17 00:13 Suspicious - Person - 2017036185 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP17014355 911 05/23/17 08:44 Suspicious - Person - 2017036713 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP17014556 Phone 05/24/17 12:37 Suspicious - Person - 2017037084 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP17014697 Phone 05/24/17 13:30 Suspicious - Person - 2017037092 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP17014701 Phone 05/25/17 15:10 Suspicious - Person - 2017037416 Parking WCSOP17014821 Phone Theft Total: 16 05/03/1713:57 Theft 2017031594 Theft WCSOP17012332 Phone 05/04/1717:31 Theft 2017031897 Theft WCSOP17012477 Phone 05/04/1718:19 Theft 2017031910 Theft WCSOP17012484 Phone 05/05/1715:00 Theft 2017032138 Theft WCSOP17012587 Phone 05/06/1712:07 Theft 2017032374 Theft WCSOP17012704 911 05/10/17 19:40 Theft 2017033534 Residential Burglary WCSOP17013217 911 05/11/1716:58 Theft 2017033747 Theft WCSOP17013305 Phone 05/12/1717:51 Theft 2017034051 Theft WCSOP17013445 Phone 05/16/1716:28 Theft 2017035065 Theft WCSOP17013871 Phone 05/17/17 08:50 Theft 2017035222 Theft WCSOP17013939 Phone 05/19/17 08:03 Theft 2017035762 Theft WCSOSR017014161 911 05/19/1715:28 Theft 2017035889 Theft WCSOP17014226 Phone 05/22/17 19:20 Theft 2017036605 Civil Complaint WCSOP17014526 911 05/26/1719:09 Theft 2017037760 Theft WCSOP17014977 Phone 05/26/17 22:15 Theft 2017037839 Theft WCSOP17015006 Phone 05/30/1716:17 Theft 2017038822 Theft WCSOP17015429 Phone Theft - From Vehicle Total: 2 05/01/17 11:23 Theft - From Vehicle 2017031050 Theft - From Vehicle WCSOP17012106 Phone 05/20/17 15:43 Theft - From Vehicle 2017036103 Theft - From Vehicle WCSOP17014314 Phone Theft - Gas Drive Off Total: 20 05/03/17 04:59 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2017031483 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP17012281 911 05/04/17 05:58 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2017031750 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP17012401 911 05/06/17 07:23 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2017032319 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP17012681 911 05/06/17 08:25 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2017032327 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP17012683 911 05/08/17 13:05 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2017032920 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP17012938 911 05/13/17 13:45 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2017034274 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP17013541 911 05/14/17 09:56 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2017034498 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP17013631 911 05/14/17 16:45 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2017034575 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP17013673 911 05/15/17 10:32 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2017034737 Civil Complaint WCSOP17013743 911 05/15/17 19:27 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2017034849 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP17013799 911 05/15/17 19:34 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2017034852 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP17013803 911 05/20/17 07:40 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2017036049 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP17014288 Phone 05/23/17 20:56 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2017036910 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP17014644 911 ZUERCHER Page 17 of 25 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 05/25/17 08:00 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2017037309 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP17014785 911 05/26/17 08:51 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2017037608 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP17014903 911 05/26/17 12:53 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2017037662 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP17014929 911 05/26/17 21:18 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2017037809 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP17014993 911 05/27/17 12:48 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2017037973 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP17015066 911 05/28/17 17:23 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2017038347 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP17015227 911 05/30/17 01:56 Theft - Gas Drive Off 2017038680 Theft - Gas Drive Off WCSOP17015372 911 Theft - Identity Theft Total: 1 2017033731 Agency Assist WCSOP17013300 Phone 05/22/17 15:41 Theft - Identity Theft 2017036543 Theft - Identity Theft WCSOP17014505 Phone Theft - Shoplifting Total: 7 05/02/17 14:54 Theft - Shoplifting 2017031334 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP17012218 911 05/06/17 11:24 Theft - Shoplifting 2017032358 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP17012699 Phone 05/08/17 10:16 Theft - Shoplifting 2017032880 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP17012918 Phone 05/16/17 13:40 Theft - Shoplifting 2017035022 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP17013855 Phone 05/24/17 15:33 Theft - Shoplifting 2017037126 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP17014716 911 05/26/17 12:20 Theft - Shoplifting 2017037653 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP17014925 Phone 05/31/17 12:21 Theft - Shoplifting 2017039027 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP17015508 911 Threats Total: 8 05/01/1711:35 Threats 2017031053 Threats WCSOP17012110 Phone 05/01/1715:40 Threats 2017031101 Threats WCSOP17012139 Phone 05/17/1710:21 Threats 2017035246 Threats WCSOP17013951 Phone 05/18/1710:11 Threats 2017035501 Threats WCSOP17014052 Phone 05/25/1711:03 Threats 2017037358 Threats WCSOP17014801 Phone 05/26/1714:13 Threats 2017037682 Threats WCSOP17014940 Phone 05/28/17 18:21 Threats 2017038357 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP17015233 911 05/31/17 20:16 Threats 2017039150 Threats WCSOP17015559 Phone Traffic - Complaint Total: 19 05/02/17 09:59 Traffic - Complaint 2017031275 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP17012199 Phone 05/04/17 20:01 Traffic - Complaint 2017031934 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP17012497 911 05/06/17 13:26 Traffic - Complaint 2017032397 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP17012717 Phone 05/06/17 14:17 Traffic - Complaint 2017032411 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP17012722 911 05/06/17 18:30 Traffic - Complaint 2017032475 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP17012750 Phone 05/07/17 14:41 Traffic - Complaint 2017032689 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP17012835 911 05/08/17 18:29 Traffic - Complaint 2017032998 DUI WCSOP17012975 Phone 05/10/17 11:48 Traffic - Complaint 2017033422 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP17013163 Phone 05/11/17 16:09 Traffic - Complaint 2017033731 Agency Assist WCSOP17013300 Phone 05/11/17 19:53 Traffic - Complaint 2017033805 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP17013328 Phone 05/13/17 21:51 Traffic - Complaint 2017034408 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP17013598 Phone 05/14/17 15:01 Traffic - Complaint 2017034553 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP17013664 Phone 05/17/17 09:59 Traffic - Complaint 2017035239 Traffic - Complaint WCSOSRO17013948 05/20/17 07:24 Traffic - Complaint 2017036047 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP17014287 Phone 05/23/17 18:39 Traffic - Complaint 2017036867 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP17014630 Phone 05/26/17 12:59 Traffic - Complaint 2017037667 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP17014932 Phone 05/27/17 20:53 Traffic - Complaint 2017038114 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP17015118 911 ZUERCHER Page 18 of 25 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 05/28/17 15:44 Traffic - Complaint 2017038317 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP17015218 Phone 05/31/17 22:23 Traffic - Complaint 2017039181 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP17015579 Phone Traffic - Hazard Total: 2 Traffic Stop 2017031208 05/21/17 15:28 Traffic - Hazard 2017036296 Traffic - Hazard WCSOP17014401 Phone 05/28/17 19:13 Traffic - Hazard 2017038371 Traffic - Hazard WCSOP17015238 911 Traffic Stop Total: 257 05/01/17 07:58 Traffic Stop 2017031001 Officer 05/01/17 12:39 Traffic Stop 2017031061 Traffic Stop WCSOP17012117 Officer 05/01/17 21:53 Traffic Stop 2017031193 Officer 05/01/17 23:21 Traffic Stop 2017031208 Officer 05/01/17 23:31 Traffic Stop 2017031210 Officer 05/02/17 00:39 Traffic Stop 2017031217 Officer 05/02/17 01:39 Traffic Stop 2017031224 Officer 05/02/17 09:27 Traffic Stop 2017031268 Officer 05/02/17 13:05 Traffic Stop 2017031304 Officer 05/02/17 14:33 Traffic Stop 2017031327 Officer 05/02/17 16:04 Traffic Stop 2017031353 Traffic Stop WCSOP17012225 Officer 05/02/17 23:15 Traffic Stop 2017031463 Officer 05/03/17 00:13 Traffic Stop 2017031465 Traffic Stop WCSOP17012276 Officer 05/03/17 00:21 Traffic Stop 2017031467 Officer 05/03/17 01:10 Traffic Stop 2017031471 Officer 05/03/17 08:48 Traffic Stop 2017031515 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP17012298 Officer 05/03/17 14:25 Traffic Stop 2017031596 Officer 05/03/17 20:22 Traffic Stop 2017031677 Officer 05/03/17 20:28 Traffic Stop 2017031678 Officer 05/03/17 21:32 Traffic Stop 2017031695 Officer 05/03/17 22:47 Traffic Stop 2017031708 Traffic Stop WCSOP17012384 Officer 05/03/17 23:06 Traffic Stop 2017031712 Officer 05/03/17 23:17 Traffic Stop 2017031715 Officer 05/03/17 23:33 Traffic Stop 2017031719 Officer 05/04/17 00:17 Traffic Stop 2017031725 Officer 05/04/17 00:40 Traffic Stop 2017031727 Traffic Stop WCSOP17012391 Officer 05/04/17 01:21 Traffic Stop 2017031730 Officer 05/04/17 02:28 Traffic Stop 2017031735 Traffic Stop WCSOP17012392 Officer 05/04/17 08:05 Traffic Stop 2017031765 Officer 05/04/17 10:44 Traffic Stop 2017031799 Officer 05/04/17 23:17 Traffic Stop 2017031982 Officer 05/04/17 23:20 Traffic Stop 2017031984 Officer 05/04/17 23:20 Traffic Stop 2017031985 Officer 05/05/17 01:15 Traffic Stop 2017031994 Officer 05/05/17 22:01 Traffic Stop 2017032243 Officer 05/05/17 23:30 Traffic Stop 2017032265 Drugs WCSOP17012658 Officer 05/06/17 17:26 Traffic Stop 2017032453 Officer 05/06/17 22:48 Traffic Stop 2017032541 Officer 05/06/17 23:12 Traffic Stop 2017032548 Officer ZUERCHER Page 19 of 25 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 05/07/17 01:35 Traffic Stop 2017032574 Officer 05/07/17 01:57 Traffic Stop 2017032576 Officer 05/07/17 10:40 Traffic Stop 2017032636 Officer 05/07/17 12:45 Traffic Stop 2017032656 Officer 05/07/17 14:28 Traffic Stop 2017032682 Officer 05/07/17 23:09 Traffic Stop 2017032788 Officer 05/07/17 23:45 Traffic Stop 2017032799 Officer 05/08/17 00:18 Traffic Stop 2017032804 Officer 05/08/17 01:01 Traffic Stop 2017032811 Traffic Stop WCSOP17012890 Officer 05/08/17 01:35 Traffic Stop 2017032814 Officer 05/08/17 12:20 Traffic Stop 2017032911 Traffic Stop WCSOP17012941 Officer 05/08/17 15:58 Traffic Stop 2017032963 Officer 05/08/17 23:18 Traffic Stop 2017033054 Traffic Stop WCSOP17012998 Officer 05/08/17 23:37 Traffic Stop 2017033057 Officer 05/09/17 00:17 Traffic Stop 2017033061 Officer 05/09/17 00:22 Traffic Stop 2017033063 Officer 05/09/17 01:37 Traffic Stop 2017033078 Officer 05/09/17 11:00 Traffic Stop 2017033150 Traffic Stop WCSOP17013029 Officer 05/09/17 12:00 Traffic Stop 2017033166 Traffic Stop WCSOP17013037 Officer 05/09/17 13:12 Traffic Stop 2017033178 Officer 05/09/17 15:13 Traffic Stop 2017033202 Officer 05/09/17 20:18 Traffic Stop 2017033295 Officer 05/09/17 20:33 Traffic Stop 2017033301 Traffic Stop WCSOP17013117 Officer 05/09/17 22:31 Traffic Stop 2017033326 Officer 05/09/17 22:37 Traffic Stop 2017033328 Officer 05/09/17 23:01 Traffic Stop 2017033336 Officer 05/09/17 23:18 Traffic Stop 2017033338 Officer 05/10/17 00:18 Traffic Stop 2017033341 Officer 05/10/17 00:34 Traffic Stop 2017033342 Officer 05/10/17 01:10 Traffic Stop 2017033347 Officer 05/10/17 04:37 Traffic Stop 2017033357 Officer 05/10/17 07:13 Traffic Stop 2017033373 Officer 05/10/17 22:33 Traffic Stop 2017033570 Traffic Stop WCSOP17013232 Officer 05/10/17 22:39 Traffic Stop 2017033571 Officer 05/10/17 22:43 Traffic Stop 2017033572 Traffic Stop WCSOP17013233 Officer 05/10/17 23:20 Traffic Stop 2017033584 Traffic Stop WCSOP17013238 Officer 05/10/17 23:37 Traffic Stop 2017033586 Traffic Stop WCSOP17013239 Officer 05/11/17 00:15 Traffic Stop 2017033592 Officer 05/11/17 00:17 Traffic Stop 2017033594 Officer 05/11/17 01:12 Traffic Stop 2017033601 Officer 05/11/17 05:54 Traffic Stop 2017033610 Officer 05/11/17 07:46 Traffic Stop 2017033625 Officer 05/11/17 11:44 Traffic Stop 2017033679 Officer 05/11/17 14:13 Traffic Stop 2017033701 Officer 05/11/17 15:22 Traffic Stop 2017033717 Officer 05/11/17 15:46 Traffic Stop 2017033723 Traffic Stop WCSOP17013295 Officer 05/11/17 16:13 Traffic Stop 2017033734 Officer ZUERCHER Page 20 of 25 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 05/12/17 00:36 Traffic Stop 2017033859 Officer 05/12/17 00:48 Traffic Stop 2017033861 Officer 05/12/17 01:25 Traffic Stop 2017033863 Officer 05/12/17 02:47 Traffic Stop 2017033870 Officer 05/12/17 07:03 Traffic Stop 2017033887 Officer 05/12/17 07:44 Traffic Stop 2017033896 Officer 05/12/17 16:32 Traffic Stop 2017034022 Traffic Stop WCSOP17013433 Officer 05/12/17 21:30 Traffic Stop 2017034103 Officer 05/12/17 22:11 Traffic Stop 2017034114 Officer 05/12/17 23:04 Traffic Stop 2017034136 Officer 05/12/17 23:16 Traffic Stop 2017034138 Officer 05/12/17 23:32 Traffic Stop 2017034142 Officer 05/12/17 23:45 Traffic Stop 2017034145 Officer 05/13/17 01:10 Traffic Stop 2017034157 Officer 05/13/17 04:53 Traffic Stop 2017034176 Traffic Stop WCSOP17013500 Officer 05/13/17 05:14 Traffic Stop 2017034179 Traffic Stop WCSOP17013503 Officer 05/13/17 10:48 Traffic Stop 2017034237 Officer 05/14/17 01:09 Traffic Stop 2017034456 Officer 05/14/17 01:37 Traffic Stop 2017034462 Officer 05/14/17 07:39 Traffic Stop 2017034483 Officer 05/14/17 08:52 Traffic Stop 2017034491 Officer 05/14/17 17:43 Traffic Stop 2017034590 Officer 05/14/17 18:52 Traffic Stop 2017034601 Officer 05/14/17 21:11 Traffic Stop 2017034629 Officer 05/14/17 21:57 Traffic Stop 2017034637 Officer 05/14/17 22:37 Traffic Stop 2017034646 Officer 05/14/17 23:42 Traffic Stop 2017034656 Officer 05/15/17 01:45 Traffic Stop 2017034670 Officer 05/15/17 02:17 Traffic Stop 2017034672 Officer 05/15/17 02:24 Traffic Stop 2017034673 Officer 05/15/17 19:19 Traffic Stop 2017034846 Officer 05/15/17 19:24 Traffic Stop 2017034847 Traffic Stop WCSOP17013798 Officer 05/15/17 22:09 Traffic Stop 2017034888 Officer 05/15/17 23:27 Traffic Stop 2017034905 Officer 05/16/17 00:30 Traffic Stop 2017034910 Officer 05/16/17 00:45 Traffic Stop 2017034913 Officer 05/16/17 01:41 Traffic Stop 2017034920 Traffic Stop WCSOP17013821 Officer 05/16/17 09:10 Traffic Stop 2017034959 Officer 05/16/17 14:41 Traffic Stop 2017035035 05/16/17 18:28 Traffic Stop 2017035094 Officer 05/16/17 22:46 Traffic Stop 2017035158 Traffic Stop WCSOP17013913 Officer 05/16/17 22:47 Traffic Stop 2017035160 Officer 05/16/17 23:04 Traffic Stop 2017035163 Traffic Stop WCSOP17013916 Officer 05/16/17 23:27 Traffic Stop 2017035165 Officer 05/16/17 23:38 Traffic Stop 2017035167 Traffic Stop WCSOP17013920 Officer 05/17/17 00:06 Traffic Stop 2017035170 Traffic Stop WCSOP17013921 Officer 05/17/17 00:27 Traffic Stop 2017035171 Officer ZUERCHER Page 21 of 25 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 05/17/17 00:31 Traffic Stop 2017035172 Officer 05/17/17 08:56 Traffic Stop 2017035225 Officer 05/17/17 10:57 Traffic Stop 2017035254 Officer 05/17/17 11:56 Traffic Stop 2017035266 Officer 05/17/17 15:46 Traffic Stop 2017035314 Officer 05/17/17 15:50 Traffic Stop 2017035315 Officer 05/17/17 15:57 Traffic Stop 2017035318 Officer 05/17/17 23:29 Traffic Stop 2017035422 Traffic Stop WCSOP17014015 Officer 05/17/17 23:48 Traffic Stop 2017035424 Traffic Stop WCSOP17014016 Officer 05/18/17 00:06 Traffic Stop 2017035425 Officer 05/18/17 15:03 Traffic Stop 2017035570 Officer 05/18/17 16:56 Traffic Stop 2017035602 Officer 05/18/17 18:00 Traffic Stop 2017035620 Officer 05/18/17 21:20 Traffic Stop 2017035672 Officer 05/18/17 22:39 Traffic Stop 2017035695 Traffic Stop WCSOP17014138 Officer 05/19/17 02:50 Traffic Stop 2017035730 Officer 05/19/17 08:45 Traffic Stop 2017035775 Officer 05/19/17 08:56 Traffic Stop 2017035779 Officer 05/19/17 09:16 Traffic Stop 2017035783 Officer 05/19/17 09:23 Traffic Stop 2017035784 Officer 05/19/17 09:29 Traffic Stop 2017035785 Traffic Stop WCSOP17014172 Officer 05/19/17 18:31 Traffic Stop 2017035940 Officer 05/19/17 21:56 Traffic Stop 2017035995 Officer 05/19/17 23:00 Traffic Stop 2017036006 Officer 05/19/17 23:17 Traffic Stop 2017036012 Officer 05/20/17 02:01 Traffic Stop 2017036031 Traffic Stop WCSOP17014279 Officer 05/20/17 23:48 Traffic Stop 2017036181 Traffic Stop WCSOP17014350 Officer 05/21/17 01:22 Traffic Stop 2017036196 Officer 05/21/17 01:51 Traffic Stop 2017036200 Traffic Stop WCSOP17014364 Officer 05/21/17 11:18 Traffic Stop 2017036255 Officer 05/21/17 14:21 Traffic Stop 2017036282 Officer 05/21/17 14:31 Traffic Stop 2017036285 Officer 05/21/17 15:18 Traffic Stop 2017036292 Traffic Stop WCSOP17014399 Officer 05/21/17 15:35 Traffic Stop 2017036297 Officer 05/21/17 15:43 Traffic Stop 2017036298 Officer 05/21/17 15:52 Traffic Stop 2017036300 Officer 05/21/17 16:06 Traffic Stop 2017036305 Traffic Stop WCSOP17014403 Officer 05/21/17 16:18 Traffic Stop 2017036309 Officer 05/21/17 16:24 Traffic Stop 2017036310 Officer 05/21/17 18:20 Traffic Stop 2017036345 Officer 05/21/17 21:55 Traffic Stop 2017036390 Officer 05/21/17 22:06 Traffic Stop 2017036393 Officer 05/21/17 22:13 Traffic Stop 2017036397 Officer 05/21/17 23:36 Traffic Stop 2017036412 Officer 05/22/17 00:28 Traffic Stop 2017036418 Officer 05/22/17 00:38 Traffic Stop 2017036420 Traffic Stop WCSOP17014442 Officer 05/22/17 01:01 Traffic Stop 2017036423 Officer ZUERCHER Page 22 of 25 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 05/22/17 01:30 Traffic Stop 2017036426 Officer 05/22/17 01:39 Traffic Stop 2017036427 Officer 05/22/17 07:36 Traffic Stop 2017036448 Officer 05/22/17 14:49 Traffic Stop 2017036532 Officer 05/22/17 22:01 Traffic Stop 2017036643 Officer 05/22/17 22:56 Traffic Stop 2017036658 Drugs WCSOP17014542 Officer 05/23/17 01:13 Traffic Stop 2017036673 Officer 05/23/17 01:14 Traffic Stop 2017036674 Traffic Stop WCSOP17014546 Officer 05/23/17 15:34 Traffic Stop 2017036797 Officer 05/23/17 16:28 Traffic Stop 2017036824 Officer 05/23/17 21:03 Traffic Stop 2017036913 Officer 05/23/17 23:32 Traffic Stop 2017036948 Officer 05/24/17 00:56 Traffic Stop 2017036961 Officer 05/24/17 01:10 Traffic Stop 2017036964 Officer 05/24/17 01:32 Traffic Stop 2017036971 Officer 05/24/17 09:19 Traffic Stop 2017037030 Officer 05/24/17 09:22 Traffic Stop 2017037033 Officer 05/24/17 14:35 Traffic Stop 2017037111 Traffic Stop WCSOP17014712 Officer 05/24/17 15:11 Traffic Stop 2017037116 Traffic Stop WCSOP17014714 Officer 05/24/17 15:43 Traffic Stop 2017037131 Traffic Stop WCSOP17014720 Officer 05/24/17 16:10 Traffic Stop 2017037143 Officer 05/24/17 21:17 Traffic Stop 2017037234 Officer 05/24/17 22:01 Traffic Stop 2017037245 Officer 05/25/17 01:14 Traffic Stop 2017037274 Officer 05/25/17 01:52 Traffic Stop 2017037277 Officer 05/25/17 04:20 Traffic Stop 2017037287 Officer 05/25/17 07:50 Traffic Stop 2017037308 Traffic Stop WCSOP17014784 Officer 05/25/17 21:24 Traffic Stop 2017037509 Officer 05/25/17 23:32 Traffic Stop 2017037541 Traffic Stop WCSOP17014875 Officer 05/25/17 23:33 Traffic Stop 2017037544 Officer 05/26/17 00:13 Traffic Stop 2017037551 Traffic Stop WCSOP17014880 Officer 05/26/17 00:33 Traffic Stop 2017037554 Traffic Stop WCSOP17014881 Officer 05/26/17 00:54 Traffic Stop 2017037555 Traffic Stop WCSOP17014882 Officer 05/26/17 02:13 Traffic Stop 2017037568 Officer 05/26/17 20:06 Traffic Stop 2017037783 Officer 05/26/17 20:31 Traffic Stop 2017037795 Officer 05/27/17 00:11 Traffic Stop 2017037871 Officer 05/27/17 14:48 Traffic Stop 2017038002 Officer 05/27/17 17:39 Traffic Stop 2017038059 Officer 05/27/17 19:01 Traffic Stop 2017038079 Officer 05/27/17 21:56 Traffic Stop 2017038138 Officer 05/27/17 23:26 Traffic Stop 2017038166 Officer 05/27/17 23:39 Traffic Stop 2017038167 Officer 05/27/17 23:53 Traffic Stop 2017038171 Officer 05/28/17 00:56 Traffic Stop 2017038184 Officer 05/28/17 02:29 Traffic Stop 2017038198 Traffic Stop WCSOP17015154 Officer 05/28/17 02:59 Traffic Stop 2017038199 DUI WCSOP17015155 Officer ZUERCHER Page 23 of 25 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported 05/28/17 03:11 2017036240 Traffic Stop 2017038200 05/22/17 15:47 Unwanted Person Officer 05/28/17 04:46 Phone Traffic Stop 2017038202 Traffic Stop WCSOP17015156 Officer 05/28/17 08:13 Warrant - Arrest Traffic Stop 2017038228 Traffic Stop WCSOP17015171 Officer 05/28/17 17:45 05/12/17 11:08 Traffic Stop 2017038350 Traffic Stop WCSOP17015230 Officer 05/28/17 18:51 Warrant - Arrest Traffic Stop 2017038368 Warrant - Arrest 2017035252 Officer 05/28/17 19:25 05/28/17 16:00 Traffic Stop 2017038373 WCSOP17015222 Officer Officer 05/28/17 22:12 Traffic Stop 2017038413 Officer 05/28/17 23:27 Traffic Stop 2017038435 Officer 05/29/17 00:19 Traffic Stop 2017038445 Officer 05/29/17 00:47 Traffic Stop 2017038449 Officer 05/29/17 01:01 Traffic Stop 2017038453 Officer 05/29/17 02:41 Traffic Stop 2017038469 Officer 05/29/17 09:49 Traffic Stop 2017038495 Officer 05/29/17 17:15 Traffic Stop 2017038576 Officer 05/29/17 17:52 Traffic Stop 2017038586 Officer 05/29/17 22:46 Traffic Stop 2017038661 Officer 05/30/17 14:21 Traffic Stop 2017038785 Officer 05/30/17 14:35 Traffic Stop 2017038789 Officer 05/30/17 15:06 Traffic Stop 2017038797 Officer 05/30/17 16:18 Traffic Stop 2017038823 Officer 05/30/17 17:51 Traffic Stop 2017038860 Officer 05/30/17 19:44 Traffic Stop 2017038886 Officer 05/31/17 00:16 Traffic Stop 2017038939 Officer 05/31/17 00:36 Traffic Stop 2017038944 Officer 05/31/17 00:57 Traffic Stop 2017038947 Officer 05/31/17 02:02 Traffic Stop 2017038952 Traffic Stop WCSOP17015477 Officer 05/31/17 14:52 Traffic Stop 2017039052 Traffic Stop WCSOSRO17015523 Officer 05/31/17 18:05 Traffic Stop 2017039114 Officer 05/31/17 18:16 Traffic Stop 2017039120 Traffic Stop WCSOP17015545 Officer 05/31/17 23:30 Traffic Stop 2017039191 Officer Trespass Total: 2 05/11/1712:00 Trespass 2017033685 Trespass WCSOP17013278 Phone 05/13/17 18:11 Trespass; Unwanted 2017034348 Unwanted Person WCSOP17013574 Phone Unwanted Person Total: 3 05/15/17 15:37 Unwanted Person 2017034794 Unwanted Person WCSOP17013769 Phone 05/21/17 09:53 Unwanted Person 2017036240 Unwanted Person WCSOP17014376 Phone 05/22/17 15:47 Unwanted Person 2017036547 Unwanted Person WCSOP17014503 Phone Warrant - Arrest Total: 6 05/01/17 18:26 Warrant - Arrest 2017031150 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP17012152 Officer 05/02/17 19:28 Warrant - Arrest 2017031417 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP17012255 Officer 05/12/17 11:08 Warrant - Arrest 2017033940 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP17013388 Officer 05/15/17 14:37 Warrant - Arrest 2017034780 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP17013764 Officer 05/17/17 10:49 Warrant - Arrest 2017035252 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP17013954 Officer 05/28/17 16:00 Warrant - Arrest 2017038324 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP17015222 Officer ZUERCHER Page 24 of 25 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number How Reported Warrant - Attempt Total: 28 05/01/17 11:22 Warrant - Attempt 2017031048 Warrant - Attempt WCSOP17012109 Officer 05/02/17 14:50 Warrant - Attempt 2017031332 Warrant - Attempt WCSOP17012250 Officer 05/02/17 16:05 Warrant - Attempt 2017031354 Officer 05/02/17 16:18 Warrant - Attempt 2017031359 Officer 05/03/17 09:19 Warrant - Attempt 2017031525 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP17012300 Officer 05/03/17 09:39 Warrant - Attempt 2017031528 Officer 05/04/17 21:59 Warrant - Attempt 2017031961 Warrant - Attempt WCSOP17012513 05/04/17 22:46 Warrant - Attempt 2017031975 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP17012520 Officer 05/06/17 18:11 Warrant - Attempt 2017032464 Officer 05/09/17 15:24 Warrant - Attempt 2017033205 Officer 05/10/17 16:10 Warrant - Attempt 2017033478 Officer 05/10/17 17:15 Warrant - Attempt 2017033493 Officer 05/10/17 17:25 Warrant - Attempt 2017033496 Officer 05/10/17 17:30 Warrant - Attempt 2017033498 Officer 05/10/17 17:42 Warrant - Attempt 2017033503 Officer 05/11/17 21:29 Warrant - Attempt 2017033823 Officer 05/13/17 08:18 Warrant - Attempt 2017034199 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP17013515 Officer 05/15/17 18:25 Warrant - Attempt 2017034840 Officer 05/15/17 18:50 Warrant - Attempt 2017034842 Officer 05/16/17 14:02 Warrant - Attempt 2017035025 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP17013856 Officer 05/17/17 14:36 Warrant - Attempt 2017035299 Officer 05/18/17 12:28 Warrant - Attempt 2017035534 Officer 05/18/17 15:01 Warrant - Attempt 2017035569 Officer 05/19/17 09:31 Warrant - Attempt 2017035786 05/19/17 13:31 Warrant - Attempt 2017035848 Warrant - Attempt WCSOP17014208 Officer 05/26/17 15:01 Warrant - Attempt 2017037691 Officer 05/27/17 15:52 Warrant - Attempt 2017038022 Officer 05/27/17 16:15 Warrant - Attempt 2017038034 Officer Total Records: 981 ZU=RCHER Page 25 of 25 2JG��pR REGV�gTO9 aUNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III 2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUITE 210 LISLE, IL 60532-4352 May 31, 2017 Mr. Peter A. Gardner Site Vice President Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Northern States Power Company, Minnesota 2807 West County Road 75 Monticello, MN 55362-9637 SUBJECT: PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE TO DISCUSS NRC ACTIVITIES, AND 2016 END -OF -CYCLE PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT Dear Mr. Gardner: This letter is to inform you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will conduct a Category 3 public open house from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. (CDT) on July 11, 2017, at the Monticello Community Center, 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, MN 55362. The purpose of this meeting is to provide an open public forum for the Agency to discuss NRC activities with the public. In addition, members of the NRC will be available to discuss the assessment of Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant's performance. Xcel is encouraged to attend this meeting. If you have any questions regarding this meeting, please contact me at 630-829-9628. Sincerely, /RA/ Kenneth Riemer, Chief Branch 2 Division of Reactor Projects Docket No. 50-263 License No. DPR-22 cc: Distribution via LISTSERV° Letter to Peter A. Gardner from Kenneth Riemer dated May 31, 2017 SUBJECT: PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE TO DISCUSS NRC ACTIVITIES, AND 2016 END -OF -CYCLE PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT DISTRIBUTION: Jeremy Bowen RidsNrrporlLpl3 RidsNrrPMMonticello RidsNrrDirslrib Resource Cynthia Pederson Darrell Roberts Richard Skokowski Allan Barker Carole Ariano Linda Linn DRPIII DRSIII ROPassessment.Resource(d�nrc.gov ADAMS Accession Number: ML17153A128 OFFICE RIII NAME KRiemer:tt DATE 5/31/2017 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY