City Council Agenda Packet 07-12-1993AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Monday, July 12, 1993 - 7 p.m.
Mayor: Ken Maus
Council Members: Shirley rtndcrson, Prad Fy!e, Clint Herb. -;t, Pettyl--,y n
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held June 28, 1993.
3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints.
4. Consideration of a conditional use request to allow an auto body shop repair
building in a H-3 (highway business) zone. lAKation is Block 2, Part of Lot 4,
Sandberg South Addition in the city of Monticello. Applicant., John Johnson.
5. Consideration of request for installation of above -ground fuel tank --Hoglund
Transportation.
6. Consideration of adopting 1994 Monticello Heartland Express Management
Plan and adopting a resolution entering into it contract with the State of
Minnesota Department of Transportation to provide public transportation.
7. Review the Oak Ridge subdivision grading and drainage plan.
A. Adjournment.
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CPYY COUNCIL
Monday, June 28, 1993. 7 p.m.
MPmhPrs Prc+cnnt- Chirinv Andersmi ( int Herbst, Brad wle P:itty OI. en
Members Absent: Ken Maus
2. Consideration of auaroval of minutes of the regular meeting held June 14.
1993.
Motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded by Patty Olsen to approve the
meeting minutes as submitted. Motion carried unanimously with Ken Maus
absent.
3. Citizens commentslnetitions, reauests. and complaints.
None forthcoming.
4. Consideration of adontina a resolution acceatine feasibility resort and ordering
plans and specifications - Hart Boulevard Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet.
City Council was asked to consider accepting a feasibility report and ordering
plans and specifications for construction of a storm sewer system designed to
convey water from County Road 75 to the Mississippi River. The alignment
of the storm sewer will follow the parking lot to be constructed with the
proposed expansion of the Monticello -Big Lake Hospital District clinic.
According to Bret Weiss, the storm water system proposed is needed for the
following reasons:
1. The existing Hart Boulevard storm water outlet utilizes the
Bondhus property, which is limited in terms of storm water
carrying capacity.
2. The storm water affecting the existing Hart Boulevard outlet
continues to increase due to continued urbanization upstream.
3. Heavy rainfall, especially rainfall during spring thaw, could result
in damage to Hart Boulevard and downstream private property.
4. Impending expansion of the clinic at the location of the Hart
Boulevard storm water outlet creates an opportunity for
coordinating the private project with installation of the Hart
Boulevard storm sewer outlet.
Page 1 1
Council Minutes - 6/28/93
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that the total project cost is
estimated at $148,000. City staff is in the process of preparing options for
financing this Darticularstorm spwPr imnrowmpnt with tho gna] QfAo.,.,l,,..;..,.
a formula that will be applicable to future storm sewer projects. The financing
program will likely include establishment of a variety of revenue sources. It
is our goal to have the funding program reviewed by Council and in place in
time for the contract award and public hearing for this project scheduled for
August 23, 1993.
Brad Fyle asked if John Bondhus is aware of the proposed project. O'Neill
indicated that he had met with Bondhus regarding the matter and that
Bondhus is supportive ofcompleting the storm sewer project that corrects the
current situation.
After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded by Clint
Herbst to approve a resolution accepting the feasibility study and ordering the
preparation of plans and specifications for the Hart Boulevard storm sewer
outlet. Motion carried unanimously with Ken Maus absent.
SEE RESOLUTION 93-19.
Consideration of aooroval of Dlnns and specifications for refurbishment or
renlacement of the second stage digester cover and nuthorization to advertise
for bids.
John Simolu reported that the City Engineer, PSG, and City staff have been
working toward developing a set of plans and specifications that would greatly
diminish the possibility of accelerated corrosion occurring in the future.
Simola went on to note the factors that contributed to the premature failure
of the digester cover, and he explained how the plans and specifications have
been designed to correct flaws in design and operation that caused the original
corrosion problem.
After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded by Shirley
Anderson to approve plans and specifications as presented and authorize
advertisement for bids. Motion carried unanimously with Ken Maus absent.
Consideration of grunting annual anurovnl for municipal license.
After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by Patty
Olsen to approve issuance of licenses as follows:
Intoxicat.inv Liquor, On -sole
1. Monticello Liquor, Inc.
2. Silver Fox
.1. Joyner's lanes
4. Robert Eidsvold DBA Comfort Inn
Page 2
Council Minutes - 6/28/93
Intoxicatine Liquor. On -sale. Sundav
Renewals
1. Monticello Liquor, Inc.
2. Silver Fox
3. Joyner's Lanes
4. VFW Club
5. American Legion Club
Non-intoxicatine Malt. On -sale
1. Rod and run
2. Pizza Factory
3. Country Club
Non-intoxicatine Malt. Off -sale
Renewals
1. Monticello Liquor
2. Maus Foods
3. River Terrace
4. Tom Thumb
5. Holiday Stationstore
Wine/3.2 Beer Combination. On -sale
Renewal
1. Dino's Deli
Set-uu License
1. Country Club
2. Rod and Gun (steak fry only)
Club Licenses
1. VFW
2. American Legion
Gambling. Tcmmrary
1. St. Henry's Fall Festival (SEE RESOLUTION 93-21)
2. Rod & Gun Club (SEE RESOLUTION 93.20)
Page 3
Council Minutes - 6/28/93
Motion carried unanimously with Ken Maus absent.
Consideration of establishing fee schedule for reserved use of city nark
buildings.
John Simola requested that the City Council consider establishing a fee
schedule for reserved use of the new West Bridge Park building. Simola noted
that we currently have four park buildings or structures which are reserved
by the public on a regular basis throughout the summer months. Last year we
had 69 reservations for all buildings. This year we already have 70. In the
past we have charged a $50 reserve fee as a deposit to cover cleaning or
damage. Often there is more than one group or resident wishing to reserve a
particular building on the same date. A $50 deposi t ensures the individual the
use of the building on a specific date, and it keeps individuals from reserving
the building unless they are seriously considering using it. In almost all cases,
the $50 deposit is returned.
With the construction of the new building in West Bridge Park, the City has
a much greater investment than in previous buildings and structures. In
addition, the building will offer more amenities such as indoor restrooms in the
same building, a separate food -serving area, summer ventilation system, etc.
The building could be available to the general public on a rental basis
throughout the year except the skating season, which runs from late November
to early February. Simola also noted that. the current rental of the meeting
room in the library is $35 per day or portion thereof, and there appears to he
no problem with this policy. Simola also noted that other communities charge
to reserve use of certain park buildings.
Clint Herbst stated that since everyone in the city has paid for development
of the building at West Bridge Park, it should be available to city residents
only. Herbst was concerned that providing the facility to a non-resident, even
at it higher rate, could result in a city resident not having access to the facility.
Herbst noted that if you're paying taxes as a city resident, you want to he able
to use the facilities.
Clint Herbst made it motion to amend the proposed fee schedule by eliminating
the availability of the West Bridge Park building to non-residents. Motion died
for lack of a second.
Brad Fyle indicated that we need to keep the West Bridge Park building open
to township residents, and he agreed with the concept of charging a higher
buse rent to non-residents.
After discussion, a motion was made by 13rad Fyfe and seconded by Patty
Olsen to approve the proposed West Ilridge Park building rental fee schedule
as follows:
Page 4 l
Council Minutes - 6/28/93
Base rent, city residentlbusiness
$35
Base rent, non-resident
$75
Base rent, non-profit in -city
organization
fee waived
Base rent, nut -of -city profit or
non-profit organization
$7.5
Use of heat, winter season, all users
$]0
Voting in favor of the motion: Patty Olsen, Shirley Anderson, Brad Fyle.
Opposed: Clint Herbst. Absent: Ken Maus.
John Simola also requested that Council consider installing a security system
for the West Bridge Park facility.
After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded by Clint
Herbst to authorize installation of a motion detection system serving the West
Bridge Park facility at a cost of $573. Motion carried unanimously with Ken
Maus absent.
Review of Cedar Street. road alienment
Assistant Administrator O'Neill informed City Council that the City had
received a request for a conditional use permit which would allow development
of a mini -storage facility. The site of the mini -storage facility is located in
conflict with the proposed alignment of Cedar Street. O'Neill went on to
review different options for Cedar Street alignment.
After discussion, it was the consensus of Council to direct staff to prepare
alternatives for review by all affected property owners.
Consideration of accentance of 1993 Annual Sidewalk Insuect.ion Renort and
modification of Insuection Criteria.
John Simola reported that the annual sidewalk inspection revealed no big
surprises. The on -grid sidewalks within the community are in excellent shape.
We have three possible replacement panels for this summer. The City could
he responsible for replacement of those panels under our current policy. A
couple of the panels involve a vertical rise or offset of more than 1/4 inch. Our
inspection over the past few years has indicated that often these panels with
it small amount of vertical rise settle down during the middle of the summer
and ore not it problem; therefore, we would like to amend the existing cause
for repair or replacement to read "1/2 inch' rather than "1/4 inch."
Simolu also noted that off -grid sidewalks were found to be in good condition
with the exception of the stairway leading to the apartments in the northwest
corner of Walnut and River Street.
Page 5
Council Minutes - 6/28/93
Simola went on to recommend that Council accept the 1993 Annual Sidewalk
Inspection Report, order that a letter be sent to the apartment complex with
the stairway problem, and amend the Sidewalk Inspection Criteria for vertical
rises From 1/4 inch to 1/2 inch.
After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by Brad
Fyle to accept the annual sidewalk report and modify the Inspection Criteria
as requested by staff. Motion carried unanimously with Ken Maus absent.
10. Consideration of bills for the month of .lune.
A motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded by Patty Olsen to approve
payment of bills for the month of June as submitted. Motion carried
unanimously with Ken Maus absent.
11. Other matters.
A. Assistant Administrator ONeill informed Council that Bruce Thielen,
Director of the Wright County Parks Department, is seeking grant funds
for funding of improvements to. Montissippi Park. Improvements
include paving of the service road and pathways. Thielen requests that 0
Council consider adopting a resolution indicating support of the County's
efTorts to obtain grant funds.
After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded by
Patty Olsen to adopt a resolution supporting Wright County's efforts to
seek financial assistance for improvements to Montissippi Park. Motion
carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 93.22.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
Jeff O'Neill
Assistant Administrator
Page 6 �1
Council Agenda - 7/12/93
Consideration of a conditional acv rv.lnNat to a' 11n- nn Puto �„ shop`
repair huildina in a B•3 (hi¢hwav business) zone. Location is Block 2.
Part of Lot 4. Sandhera South Addition in the city of Monticello.
Applicant, aobn Jolhn_%on. (J.O.!
A. REFERFNCE AND IiACKGROUND:
This request is submitted by the same applicant and is nearly identical to lite
conditional use permit request considered by the City Council on April 24,
1989, at which time Council approved the request. As Ken and Shirley may
recall, a zoning ordinance amendment was also approved in conjunction with
the issuance of the conditional use permit.
Due to the fact that the applicant did not complete construction allowed under
the conditional use permit within one year, it is necessary to bring this item
back before the City Council. Unless the present Council disagrees with the
findings made by the Council in 1989, it, is recommended Chat Um Council lake
the name action as taken in April I!Y)2.
Following you will find the agenda supplements from 1989, which include both
the zoning ordinance umendment and associated conditional use permit
request. Also included is a copy of the minutes of both Uw I'lanning
Commission and the suhsequenl City Council meeting.
At the meeting, Gary Anderson will detail any of the minor changes to the
present site plan that may have occurred since the original conditional use
permit, was granted.
It. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
I. Dlotioa to reconuneod that. Monticello Auto liody Shop be grunted a
conditional use permit, which would allow the operation of tui auto body
shop in a I1-3 zone. Applicant must comply with all conditions included
in the zoning amendment.
Motion bused on the finding (.hill awarding (he conditional use permit.
is consistent with the comprehensive plan, and the operation of an auto
body shop under conditions set. fort It provides sulTicienl assurance that
auto shop activity will be cumpat.ihle with the character of the
surrounding area.
This is the some motion and finding nuide by Council in 1989.
Council Agenda - 7/12/93
Motion to recommend denial of conditional our hermit, as requested.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative U.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Planning Commission minutes from 4/20/89 meeting: Copy of Council agenda
items k4 and 45 and minutes from V24/89 meeting.
Special Planning Commission Minutes - 4/20/89
3. Reconvene Public Hearing - Consider granting conditional use permit to
Monticello Auto Body which would allow an auto body shop to o[ate at
Lot 4, Block 2, Sanaberg South Addition. Applicant, Monticello Auto
Body.
Motion was made by Mori Malone, seconded by Richard Martie, to approve
the conditional use request to allow an auto body shop to operate at
Lot 4, Block 2, Sandberg South Addition. Motion carried unanimously with
Cindy Lemm absent and Richard Carlson abstaining.
Council Agenda - 4/24/89 10
04pk
Consideration of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance which would allow
acto bodq Shops as a conoitional use within the B-3 (highway business)
zone. (J.O.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council amend the
Zoning Ordinance to allow auto body shop activity to occur in a B-3 zone
as a conditional use. It was the view of the Planning Commission that
such activity, if regulated by stringent conditions, is consistent with
the character of the B-3 area and that such activity will not serve to
depreciate the area in which it is proposed. If Council approves the
proposed amendment, it is then asked in the next item to consider a
request for a conditional use permit by John Johnson, operator of
Monticello Auto Body. Specifically, Johnson wishes to develop a facility
at Lot 4, Block 2, Sandberg South. The proposed facility would have
exposure to two public right-of-ways, including Sandberg South Road on
the front and the undeveloped Marvin Road to the rear. The proposed
amendment would allow auto body repair shop activities to be intermingled
with the following permitted land uses in the B-3 area: Auto accessory
store, commercial recreation uses, motels, restaurants, cafes, printing
office. There is also potential for development of B-1 and B-2 uses, as
they are also permitted in the B-3 area. These uses include retail 0
sales, plumber shops, repair shops, insurance sales, hardware, grocery
store, and other similar uses. Please note that the City Council in 1986
reviewed the concept of developing an auto body shop along Highway 25
just north of the site of the Glass Hut and at that time had a negative
view of the proposal.
Analysis
'fie Zoning Ordinance requires that Council review the proposed amendments
in terms of its consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, compatibility
with characteristics and geography of the area, and the demonstrated need
for such use.
Comprehensive Plan
The Planning Commission found that this proposal is not inconsistent with
the Comprehensive Plan.
Character and geographic area involved
There are a number of allowable uses in the B-1 through B-3 zones that
may not mix well with an auto body shop operation. For instance,
approving this amendment establishes the potential for development of a
restaurant or a motel next to an auto body shop. one can easily sea
potential conflicts between the two uses. On the other hand, if the shop
is properly monitored and if the shop adheres to otrict conditional use
permit terms, there might not be any problem mixing the uses. In fact,
the auto body chop, with the stricter conditions aocociated with its
operation, might make it one of the more attractive busineocee in the
Council Agenda - 4/24/89
area. Of course, the greatest concern is potential negative impact on
surrounding properties due to unsightly storage of damaged vehicles, and
excess noise and fumes that may result from the auto painting process.
In alternative +1 below are outlined a number of conditions that could be
attached to the conditional use permit that would act to mitigate the
potential negative impacts.
Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it
is proposed
This particular decision factor generates potential argument against the
proposed amendment. It may be that a well-run, clean auto body operation
will have a positive effect on the neighborhood. On the other hand, it
might be that even a well-run operation may have a negative effect on the
ability of nearby land owners to develop land uses normally associated
with B-1 through B-3 uses. If this happens, the value of the surrounding
property depreciates in value. Steps must be taken to assure that the
auto body shop will not have a negative effect on the adjoining B-3
areas. It was the view of the Planning Commission that the conditions
outlined will provide assurance that the adjoining land owners will not
be negatively impacted. The Planning Commission reviewed a number of
auto body shops now operating in the metro area and found that those that
operated under a set of conditions tended to be well-run, clean
operations that had no negative impact on the adjoining land uses.
The demonstrated need for such use
Auto body repair is a permitted use in the I-2 (light industrial) zone,
and property is available in this area for development of an auto body
shop. It is, therefore, difficult to demonstrate the need for
establishing an auto body shop as a conditional use in the B-3 zone. It
is the view of the body shop operator that there is a need for this
activity in the B-3 zone because commercial exposure to high traffic
areas is vital to his business. Such exposure is not available in I-2
areas.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to amend the Zoning Ordinance to include auto body repair as a
conditional use, including but not limited to the following
conditions:
a. Door opening to service garage area must not face street
frontage. ST
b. vehicle storage area limited to O percent of floor space of the
structure housing the auto body shop.
c. All vehicles being serviced and all vehicle parts must be stored
inside or in vehicle storage area.
d. vehicle storage area shall be enclosed by enclosure intended to
screen the view of vehicles in storage from the outside.
Enclosure shall conaist of a oix-foot high, 100 percent opaque
fence designed to blend with the auto body shop structure and
consisting of materials treated to resist discoloration.
Council Agenda - 4/24/89
e. The floor of vehicle storage area shall consist of asphalt
paving. t: 4- C_0 Q4 T4..
f. No work on vehicles or vehicle parts shall be conducted outside
the confines of the auto body shop.
g. The advertising wall facing a public right-of-way shall consist
of no more than 50 percent metal material.
h. The secondary or non -advertising wall facing a public
right-of-way shall utilize a combination of colors or materials
to break up the monotony of a single color flat surface.
i. The development shall conform to minimum parking and landscaping
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance.
J. No conditional use permit shall be granted for an auto body shop
within 600 feet of a residential or PZM zone existing at the time
the conditional use permit is granted.
Motion based on the finding that the amendment is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and the amendment and concurrent conditions result
in the auto body shop activity being compatible with the character of
the surrounding area.
2. Motion to amend the Zoning Ordinance to include auto body repair as a
conditional use, including but not limited to the following
conditions: D
a. All vehicles being serviced and all vehicle parts must be stored
inside the auto body shop structure. No storage of vehicles or
materials shall be allowed outside the confines of the auto body
shop.
b. No work on vehicles or vehicle parts shall be conducted outside
the confines of the auto body shop.
c. The advertising wall facing a public right-of-way shall consist
of no more than 50 percent metal material.
d. The secondary or non -advertising wall facing a public
right-of-way shall utilize a combination of colors or materials
to break up the monotony of a single color flat surface.
e. Development shall conform to minimum parking and landscaping
requirements of the zoning Ordinance.
f. No conditional use permit shall be granted for an auto body shop
within 600 feet of a residential or PZM zone existing at the time
the conditional use permit is awarded.
Motion based on the finding that the amendment is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and conditions associated with the amendment
results in auto body shop activity as being compatible with the
character of the ourrounding area.
This alternative was not recommended by the Planning Comrtmiaaion, as
it was felt that the economic difficulties of creating a large enough
structure to contain all of the vehicles and vehicle parte was not
reasonable. it was also the view of the Planning Commninoion that the
conditions associated with alternative #1 would sufficiently protect
the land values of the adjoining neighbors.
-3-
M
Council Agenda - 4/24/89
3. Motion to recommend denial of the proposed amendment based on the
finding that the auto body repair activity is not compatible with the
permitted and conditional uses in the B-3 zone, and there is no
demonstrated need for establishing the proposed conditional use in
the B-3 zone.
Council should know that there were no individuals present at the
public hearing to object to the proposed rezoning. However, there
was a letter submitted by an adjoining land owner which indicated
opposition to the proposed zoning amendment. That letter is enclosed
for your review.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommendation to the Planning Co=dssion was split between
alternatives #1 and #2. There is a view amongst staff that
alternative #1 is the best selection., as the conditions are stringent
enough to assure that auto body shop activity will not have a detrimental
impact on the adjoining neighborhood. At the same time, the cost to
comply with the conditions are reasonable. There are also arguments for
alternative #2 which requires that all storage be contained within the
primary structure. This alternative is positive in that it reduces the
number of conditions necessary and, therefore, provides additional
assurances that the development will not become a negative influence on
the adjoining properties. Of course, the problem with this proposal is
that it requires a larger structure and significantly increases the
development cost. This approach, though expensive, has been used in the
City of Elk River, where no vehicles are allowed to be stored outside the
main shop building. As noted earlier, Planning Commission is
recommending alternative #1. Finally, after reviewing the operations of
numerous auto body shops, it became apparent that those shops that must
live up to conditions have been doing so and are maintaining attractive
businesses. It appears that it is reasonable to expect that positive
experiences of communities that have allowed auto body shop activity in
commercial zones will also occur in Monticello. Therefore, it is the
view of staff and the Planning Commission that given the conditions
listed, auto body shop activity will not be a detriment to the area and
will not reduce adjoining land values.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of site location map; Copy of pertinent oectiono of Comprehensive
Plan; Letter from Central Minnesota Projections; Copy of zoning map.
-4-
c�
/; � J. ?� " ��• \ \.�'7�
42
oma'
1
N / GH Wq � moi_ � } ,,^.. � ,. -• � •--�• G ' ,.�w
Consideration of preparing an amendment to"
Ithe Monticello Zoning Ordinance 'to al'rov=auto d�
shops as a conditionalJush within a B23
' (highway business) zone �-�,•%/.j
�.,��� �'�'.�GZ• 1 F TE-
Y•.r•':' • APPLICANT: Monticello Auto Body,
9
r'w
i.F�`E 'E• . i 1 TtiCMAS0.
-- -fit . — _ � —. _ .._ THfNas— —..� �_--_�_---_'f[•� :�—
I. Dental „� �, •ti-�+�,� / •\ �� -_ i I .- �I
CC
y O[f ice
Ic• t-��--•fplur•binq 00
Vacant ` ai' `vv-��%.1.y.,-T'• / \ I �I
Vacant--
,,,, General 14antal I c " t , f t • _ so
1
kf1Lp �i , O►� , I `,P
Y
I1
M 1 4-
ftp
� G
1
M
-40-
CCuMERCIAL
POLICIES
00
1.
Commercial development in general and successful retailing
functions should occur both in the central business district and
the shopping center area contiguous to Interstate 94.
2.
The Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance, and other measures
and procedures will be modified in realistic recognition of the
needs of contemporary commercial enterprises and the need to
properly control such enterprises at the local community level;
commercial development policy will not be rigid and inflexible,
and neither shall it be indiscriminately permissive.
3.
Adequate provision should be made for expansion of suitable
areas for highway oriented commercial develooment requiring
large acreages for use such as motels, auto and implement
dealerships, and lumber and building supply yards. These uses
should be encouraged to develop in new locations along
Interstate 94 at Highway 25.
4.
The location of new shopping areas should be justified by an
adequate market study (market radius, customer potential,
suitanle location in the market radius, etc.) and consideration
for tine neighborhood, land use, and circulation pattern.
S.
Commercial areas should be as compact as possible. Compact
commercial areas are particularly advantageous for retail uses,
as they concentrate shopping and parking. A community is
benefited by reducing expoaure to residential areas and having a
better control over parking and traffic needs. For this reason,
'strip" and "spot" commercial development should not be
permitted.
6.
Highway oriented uses along Interstate 94 should be concentrated
to the greatest extent possible so as not to waste prime
commercial land nor spread the uses so as to not be definable as
a "viable commercial area".
7.
Future commercial areas should be based upon the concept of the
integrated busineon center developed according to a specific
site plan and juatified by an economic analysis of tho area to
be served.
8.
All major commercial areas shall be pre -zoned based upon the
Comprehensive Plan. No areas shall be re -zoned to cosaorcial
use unless they are unown to bo properly located in accordance
with the policies and standards of the Comprehensive Plan.
9.
Boundaries of commercial districts shall be well-defined so as
to prevent intrusion into residential areas; residential areas
must be properly scroaned from the associated ill effects of
adjacent and nearby commercial area.
-40-
r;
February 28, 1989
Planning Commission
City of Monticello
250 East Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362
Dear Planning Commission Members:
00
�a'
Central Minnesota Projections, a Minnesota partnership, owns Lots 2 and 3,
Block 2 and Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Sandberg South. It recently sold Lot 1,
Block 2, to Dr. John Erlandson who has constructed a combination dental clinic
and residence.
The other lot is occupied by General Rental and The Plumbery. we oppose the
application of Monticello Auto Body for any change in existing permitted uses
under present zoning. We believe the future development of Sandberg South
should be more in keeping with profit -retail trend and would discourage any
move towards light industrial.
Thank you for your consideration.
'L6NTRAL MI NESOTA PROJECTIONS
�.1��M CEL
James P. F .ter, Partner
02A
zz_(((���,_� - -
.1 \ �^�' � � _ _� �� � �' �. tet''-�"''_�```_' _ _ °c� • � �
is
R.2
It
ago �
s.
u Rt 82 F
!3 - 3 1 '12
us
t, I
City of Montic::llo ; '" _=;A• f.-
Wright County INurresota
1 � I
Existing Zoning ; (I N T li C t] L L 1) \
It ,` ------- --�J---
1
Council Minutes - 4/24/89 C0/1
I4'o,
4. Consideration of amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to allow auto body
shops as a conditional use within the 3-3 (highway business) zone.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reviewed the recommendation of the
Planning Commission which was in favor of allowing auto body activity
.. ^^�.- e. . - thO_t _ cl
ry Aed that mine c-je /`/ln!j{,mt1n4 Are Arhhere'd
to. Ken Haus reviewed the proposed conditions and suggested that the
vehicle storage area be limited to 501 of the floor space of the
structure housing the auto body shop rather than 30% of the floor
space. It was his view that it would be more likely that all the
vehicles that were to be serviced by the body shop would remain inside
the storage area if it was slightly larger. He also suggested that the
floor of the vehicle storage area shall consist of asphalt or concrete
paving. Mayor Maus also noted that the development of an auto body
shop in this area does tie in with the existing land uses and that
given the conditions listed, it is likely that the auto body shop will
have a positive impact on the neighborhood. Fran Pair concurred with
this viewpoint.
Warren Smith noted his concern regarding this issue and indicated his
uneasiness about allowing auto body shop activity to occur in the 8-3
zone. It was Smith's view that it will be difficult to guarantee the
adjoining property owners that their property values will not be
diminished by the presence of an auto body shop in the neighborhood.
After continued discussion, motion was made by Dan Blonigen, seconded
by Shirley Anderson, to include auto body repair as a conditional use,
including but not limited to the following conditions:
a. Door opening to service area garage must not face street
frontage.
b. Vehicle storage area limited to 501 of floor space of the
structure housing the auto body shop.
c. All vehicles being serviced and all vehicle parts must be
stored inside or in vehicle storage area.
d. Vehicle storage area shall be enclosed by enclosure intended to
screen the view of vehicles in storage from the outside.
Enclosure shall consist of a six-foot high, 1001 opaque fence
designed to blend with the auto body shop structure and
consisting of materials treated to resist discoloration.
a. The floor of the vehicle storage area shall consist of asphalt
or concrete paving.
f. No work on vehicles or vehicle parts shall be conducted outside
the confines of the auto body shop.
g. The advertising wall facing the public right-of-way shall
consist of no more than 501 metal material.
h. The secondary or non -advertising wall facing a public
right-of-way shall utilize a combination of colors or materials
that serve to break up the monotony of a single color flat
surface.
L The development shall conform to minimum parking and
landscaping roquiremento of the Zoning Ordinance.
j. No conditional use permit shall be granted for an auto body
shop within 600 feet of a residential or PZM zone existing at
the time the conditional use permit to granted.
Motion based on the finding that the amendment is consistent with the
Cceprehennive Plan, the amendment, and concurrent condition result in
auto body chop activity being compatible with the character of the
surrounding area. voting in favor of motion: Ran Maus, Fran Pair, Dan
Blontgen, Shirley Anderson. Opposed: Warren Smith. SEE ORDINANCE
AMDMMENT NO. 115.
Council Agenda - 4/24/89 0046Y
S. Consideration of a conditional use permit request - Monticello Auto Body.
i.T,n.l
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
If the City Council determines that auto body shop activity should be
allowed as a conditional use un a B-3 zone, then Council is asked to
consider granting a conditional use permit to Monticello Auto Body as
discussed. The Planning commission did recommend that the conditional
use permit be granted to Monticello Auto Body.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to recommend that Monticello Auto Body shop be granted a
conditional use permit which would allow the operation of an auto
body shop in a B-3 zone. Applicant must comply with all conditions
included in zoning amendment. Motion based on the finding that
awarding the conditional use permit is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan, and the operation of an auto body shop under
conditions set forth provides sufficient assurance that auto shop
activity will be compatible with the character of the surrounding
area.
2. Motion to recommend denial of conditional use permit as requested,
C. STAFF RECOMIENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative 11.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Seo previous agenda item.
-g-
146k
Council Minutes - 4/24/89
5. Consideration of a conditional use permit request - Monticello Auto
Body'
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that the Planning Commission
recommended to the City Council that Monticello Auto Body be awarded a
conditional use permit as requested. Warren Smith noted that since the
Council had agreed to establish auto body activity in the B-3 zone that
he would not oppose this particular conditional use request, as it was
his view that auto body shop activity at this particular location is
appropr iate .
There being no further discussion, motion was made by Fran Pair,
seconded by Dan Blonigen, to grant Monticello Auto Body Shop a
conditional use permit to allow the -operation of an auto body shop in
the B-3 zone. Applicant must comply with all conditions included in
the recent zoning amendment. Motion carried unanimously.
Council Agenda - 7/12/93
s. Consideration of a request for installation of above -ground fuel tank--
Hoolund Transportation. 1R.W.1
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Hoglund Transportation currently has two underground 10,000 gallon fuel
tanks that they use for their bus fueling operations. As we are seeing
happening in many cases, underground tanks are heing removed and new
shove -ground thermal insulated tanks are being constructed in their place.
This is similar to what the City of Monticello did at its public works building
in removing the underground tanks and installing an above -ground tank.
It is our understanding that current State hire Marshal regulations indicate
that individual tanks cannot exceed 6,000 gallons in capacity, and it specific
site cannot have more than 18,000 gallons tidal. Hoglund Transportation
wants to install a dual-purpose 111,0011 gallon Lank that would he split into
7,500 gallons fur diesel fuel and 2,500 gallons for unleaded gasoline. Since this
tank is larger than allowed by 4,000 gallons, it variance can he requested from
the Stale hire Marshal.
The reason the City Council is asked to review this request is that the Stats
Fire Marshal will allow local jurisdictions to rule on the variance request if
they so desire, or the locaal jurisdiction cull recommend that it varill lice f request
Ite denied by the Suite hire Marshal, or the local jurisdiction can refer all
decisions to the Slate Fire Marshal. Since the State Fire Marshal deals with
these types of situations more often than local jurisdictions Land also since they
should have more expertise in reviewing these types of requests, itis
recommended that we not take over that responsihility but refer all variance
requests to the State. Along this line, if the City did not like as particular
variance request for whatever reason, the City would have the option of still
referring the decision to the Sate but. Ua send a letter disallowing the variance.
Hoglund Transportation has hired Catiggs Contracting Inc. of Shoreview,
Minnesula, to install the shove -ground tank if the variance is approved. The
Slate Eire Marshal's office would be ahle to review the variance request at its
meeting on Tuesday, July 13, but they need it decision from the Cily as to
whether we want to have jurisdiction or whether we will refer jurisdiction to
the State.
It. ALTERNATIVE A(INONS:
The City Council could retain approval right; and grunt the variance
without State Fire Marshal's input.
Council Agenda - 7/12/93
The City could disapprove the variance for the additional storage
capacity without further input from State Fire Marshal.
The Council could pefer all variance requests to the State Fire Marshal
for their expertise in reviewing applications.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
On the surface it appears that since the State Fire Marshal reviews these
types of requests more often and should he more familiar with the pro's and
con's to these types of requests, the City should refer all variances to the State
Fire Marshal. If the City Council is not in favor of seeing such a large above-
ground storage tank constructed within the city, a letter can he written to the
State Fire Marshal recommending disapproval of the variance. If the City does
not have an opinion one way or the other, simply noting that the State Fire
Mnrshal has jurisdiction would be sufficient.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Variance request documents from Griggs Contracting for Hoglund
Transportation.
OMSION OF STATE Flue MARSHAL
r�arcdT -Om
.� dATT Srw Sr"97
I
V. -..,. w. xwr& IU"
/
STATE OF MINNESOTA
CEPARTT/EVT CF 911e`P SAG�rV
7AR139c8 REpOES;
DEAR SII:
Pr ZASZ ACCE?: --=S FOR A 7AR_A4CB SS( E FOLLC1.7NC KA -.7Z3:
t. COMP"= IDDRESS OF PAOPSA^: t4-1 L.. .A '/3w
/v�aA�, c.af.L. h,r• TS�L1
2. DA= OF CRD83:
F:L_ MAMA C: KNOW:
= •
?T -RE ZISPS^CR =SOIRO ORDE3:
S . I.-4/'rXMI-0ER:
6. NAt_' OF ?:RSCA RFCOES.-%(G 7A.=ANC3:
Toc.4 h:G.•d�tSa--
. CMO r— =R= OF • P°:SSGN RECTM-=C 71RIARCE: G ,e..� q s
5 7 o s we ee v V, - '04AK
5 niuJCavrt..r. M,..• ss�iV
9. S:v3�'7RE aP PS?309 RZQUW::NO 71RSANCB:
•'•_:LSI AITICS A CO3Lar-17! 3:1:-`�.°Y'. mLA=r=YO ==As A. 3, AND C Fncm PACE
ON'c OF 21SMC:IC!L�. SOPPt—TWM-AL I'.-w`!S SGCII LS F'.COA ?'-ABS, CZN-IAC' CR
3=3 OR P90:OCui M A$8 *niC7G =.
FYS.A=a I
(0•/23/87)
AN E•CUAL OPPCMNlrf D0 0` ISA
J
BO . cGeoc6:t 01 40olde Wdsm , :,*I tdai.00,:o.
lniin I.......
GRIGGS CONTRACTING, INC.
Environmental Contractors
Shoreview, Minnesota 56128
(812) 482-0444 • FAX (612) 484.6098
REF: VARIANCE REQUEST 5/24/93
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
The following request is made tc InsEa11 a 10,000 gal., 2 product
Thermo Tank at this facility. The tank split would be 1,500 gals.
"diesel" and 2,500 gals. "unleadea gasoline'.
The tank system Is a 2 hour fire rated system and the product has
State approval. The tank is used for private controlled fueling
under trained personnel. The larger tank is requested because of
their total usage and their improved purchasing power with the
transport load pricing level. In order to remain competitive,
this carrier must control their fueling costs.
U -fuel's system is the safest above ground system on the market
today. With safety concerns for the operator and the environment,
this system addresses these sufficiently.
All the perinent Information and forms are attached. Thank you
for your consideration.
Joel Henderson
Griggs Contracting, Inc.
4owwsor and 8 Undargroune Tank SYcnma • Rrneouavw 6q&Wwi 6 Sawico 5 _ e
Two -Hour Fire Rated Fuel System Specifications
Double Product ! -t Bottom Load
Bullet Proof - Thermo Tank With Pad
10,000 gallon 1/4' steel UL 142 product tank 9'x 21' (capacity;t 3%)
3/16' extericr =ntainmer:t tank - 114' x 23'
8'x 30' tank support and skid system
Overall dimensions 120'H x 114'W x 30'L (excluding working vent)
FACTORY ASSEMBLED SYSTEM INCLUDES:
1 3' thermal ceramic two hour fire rated fining tested per UL 1709
2 3' bottom load fitting with check valve, gate valve, and locking cover per NFPA 30 3-7
2 3' x 20 mesh removable fuel strainer in bottom load fill system
2 Bottom load spill container (25 gallon) wiL1 drain valve :o conform to NFPA 30 2-3.3.1
2 Stage I vapor recovery system with locking cover
2 Siphon supply lines
1 Fire rated interstitial tank monitoring gauge per UL 1709
2 Emergency vent to conform to NFPA 30 2-3.5
2 Manway to product tank with 4' access nipple
2 3' pressure/vacuum working vent to conform with NFPA 30 2-3.4.2
2 Fusible link fire valve as required by UFC 79.904(e)2
2 Explosion proof solenoid valve at tank as required by NFPA 30A 2.1.7
2 Explosion proof flexible supply line to pump per NFPA 30 3-1
2 96' x 42' x 7' leak: containment chamber under pump per NFPA 30A 4-2.1
2 12'x 15' lockable access hatch to containment chamber per NFPA 30 3-3.2
2 4' leak proof pump riser welded to deck
2 Extemai product level gauge
1 1/2' interstitial vacuum test port to conform with NFPA 30 2-8.3.1
1 InterstitiaJ Inspection/access coupling at top end ciittank
2 lifting lug
1 20 &C fire extinguisher as roquired by UFC 79.908
Wired for selected dispensing system to conform with Ch. 5.
Art 500, NFPA 70 (d installed)
Primed with high wilds epoxy enamel
Painted with 86% reflective polyurethane Amershield paint
Labeled as required
2/93
6.18
' o...K�c..w �oPa...:cl.ttvc���•� }�.
tHvb-o�sw�'tul ay� `GLw». S� �/
1 /
T
n �
� 3
30
_
34' 1
j i i j I i I ` •open.. �i.Rcw�•wf�. I , �1u � •
rj1 h
L UL IQ l.d.d P—d—L T.4.
2 S...d. Vra.l°..rd Tao.
7 Ld.rdd.d V. *
SStm.I VT M IL. — dL..
PAt—Alq
C—.L—,L
8 El.clrrcd .A.w:l— Fbw
7. gad swil.,..d B.yI %rdu.
R L.,c IL Ys dC— Vil
le ct d. G.V. 1 F' .I L-1 I
I lA-....�.rv.-_.... $6 -bo V..d
L? A.l.eln+ Nand
Il 11. o—p—r L.lpd
Il Fr. S.ppv..ws. ^tialn.
5 E—C-9 E6e4. A 9.A-Uf
6 B.�.' Pod•
la ell l'oi L.Ped
A F"rp l.o./Sgrp Lv.
22 Frope"..
1.7
i! i......... ....... / i. .i. r ...........1 .............i it
■ •:y4
• /
�._. t•--`-_�--..._ _............................ "' �1.. .............. /
12.000 GollorL Two ProducE SyeLem I Cienerol 1713k oil• „® I PP.A. '� 9 /92
Council Agenda - 7112/93
p, .... ..� s•• . • � ♦..,/-e v��a��.o•�V ■ICaI'•rtiaU Gxr/rCMt1
Management Plan and adopting a resolution entering into a contract
with the State of Minnesota Department of Transportation to provide
public transportation. (J.O.)
A. REFERENCE ANI) BACKGROUNI)
Council is asked to review the following summary of the Heartland Express
operation, review the management plan, and consider adopting it resolution
entering into a contract with the State of Minnesota Department of
Transportation to provide public trauspx)rtatiun.
Following is a summary of the performance of the system during 1993, along
with a description of the budget necessary to operate the system in 1994.
1983 BUDGET PROJECTIONS VERSUS PROJECTED ACTUAL COST
Alter six months of operations, it is fairly safe to say that the cost to operate
the bus in 1993 will be under budget. by approximately $5,5110. The 1993
budget included a total operations cost of $(;7,043. Itis projected that the tuUd
cost to operate the system in I'.Kl will he approximately $61,482. Following
tore reasons why the system is operating at it cost Ielow projections:
Time spent by City staff working; on the system is projected to he less
than expected, which equates to it savings of $1,400.
The hudgel called fur operating the system it total of 2,500 hours. Itis
projected that in 1993 the actual hours of operation will amount to
2,280, which will create it savings 40f$4,700. Ily reducing hours during
slow limes, we were able to operate the system more efficiently.
I{evenuos
Fare revenues for 1993 are pnijected to he higher than expected. Fare revenue
for 199:1 wits prujecled at $9,591. Actual fire revenue for the year is estimated
la come in around $10,411.
In terms of system use and efficiency, the system improved in IW3 over 199'2
for instance.
Council Agenda - 7/12/93
1QQ'a V ...4 lot"' do .itc ...a. ..�;
service hours. 'therefore, despite increases in the hourly rate to operate
the system. we have managed to forestall concurrent increases in the
cost per ride.
2. In 199:3, we have seen fare revenue become it slightly larger share of the
revenue needed to operate the system. In 1992, 14.17'7; of the necessary
revenue came from the fare kw)x versus 16.69'/, projected for 199:1. The
1994 budget projects it fare revenue/expense ratio of 161/,. It continues
to he our goal to ultimately have fares pay 201,; of the operations
expense.
Senior citizen use of the system has increased dramatically after falling
off in 1992. Unfortunately, it appears that children are not using the
system as much. I am sure that this is due to changes in school
schedules combined with Che bus quitting time being moved from 6 p.m.
to 5 p.m.
['lease see the budget. and ridership summary for more detail regarding
ridership trends and stalistical measures of efficiency.
SUMMARY OF NET EXPENSE '1'O CITY • 1993
The cost to operate the system is down and system revenues are up. The net
effect, results in it reduction in lite amount of (:it.y funds necessary to operate
the system. The MM budget called for it 0t,y expenditure of $17,226. It is
estimated that the actual cost to the (:il,v in 1993 will amount to $14,547.
DESCRIPTION OF 1994 PROPOSED RUDCE'1'
The 19)4 budget projects it total operations cost of $7(1,54(1, which is $:3,6011
higher Chun the budget approved for 1993. Revenue sources include $42,92M
from the Suite of Minnesotan, $1 1,416 from flare revenue, and $17,20:1 from 1he
City. Respite a higher hudget nnaount, Lite city cool ributinn will remain ahout
the same as budgeted for in 1993 1$17,20111 because Gare revenue is expected
to pay it larger share of the cost Io operate the system.
The 1tM14 budget assumes no increase in city staff expenses and it $2,714
increase in the contract, mileage, and gasoline expenses. This increase is fixed
by the contract with Haglund coach Lines. The budget pnnjects that. the total
hours of operation will reach 2,500. and ridershipdfare revenues will nuainc ain
the pace set in 1993.
Council Agenda - 7/12/93
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Motion to adopt or modify and adopt the 1994 Monticello Heartland
Express Management Plan and adopt the resolution entering into a
contract with the State of Minnesota Department of Transportation to
provide public transportation.
Under this alternative, Council accepts the management plan and
continues to support the operation of the Non ticello Heartland Express.
This alternative commits the City to financing 40'6 of the project costs
via fare and tax revenue.
Any modifications to the plan desired by Council could he incorporated
into the motion adopting the management plan.
2. Motion to deny adoption of the 1992 Monticello Heartland Express
Management Plan and do not adopt the resolution entering into a
contract with the Stale of Minnesota Department of Transportation to
provide public transportation.
If Council is not satisfied with system operation or is not willing to
commit the City to funding the local share, then (.his alternative should
Iw adopted.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends alternative #1. The syacm continues to meet the
transportation needs of many elderly and handicapiwd citizens. In addition,
children (and (,heir parents) in significant. nunihers are taking advantage of
this tnuasparlalioo resource. System performance in terms of ridership and
cost efficiency meets or exceeds Q1N/I)()T expectation,.
1), SUPPORTING DATA:
Budget and ridership summary; Management Phan; Resolution.
MONTICELLO HEAR LAND EXPRESS - BUDGE T AND RIDERSHIP SUMMARY - 1993
Y 1 O
1997
TOTAL
BUTIOII
PRO.RCTED
ASKNG
Opwsnnp
F.p—
ACIVA
'm
1t"
IM
{'areo/I,M 9—
1010
A&—. M9ml A&-1 1 54 1—
91.563 V
925390
92.060 W
$100000
97.090 W
1035
G-0011— a %,—, W.9
$47803
9315 18
9199 00
9630 36
618900
+ntS
I $1$1$14 p4n.wna
SAW St
$15031
965600
6.50 W
6556 W
1060
TOTAL Ptk", NEL SFIIVM,FS
--_- ----
62,93037
------- -----------
611946
93.42500
92.09036
93.42500
.......................................................
Aem,nrlanv9 CM.pen
104
T.—I, aM 1,0 E alwnw
woo
90 00
SSW 00
9150 00
9200 00
1090
A0V4,11Xnp Mar.—Qn 6P,pnalnnal
991900
9000
660000
610000
960000
1100
Lea'. AW. -g 6 P,094Punai f 4w
919 15
$000
$000
$000
6100 00
1131
0851$1 TR,9c m— cn.,g- SK CM V
9269 00
950 00
$14000
$10000
1140 00
1140
TOTAL ADMNISIRIIIIVE CHARGES
11,29{.19
660$
91.34000
266000
61.14000
.......................................................
1110
f,rr AMIIMur4nlw
$.944
61,91148
$.33500
93.94792
94.31959
1166
Cama'19r.+c4 Marmenarc4Lapd
9000
$115W
8000
911319
6000
1200
_.__._
TOTAL VFHCLt CHAHGl S
----- --------
$.9$26
..............
82,08485
$,51600
----------- _________
8,06611
64.31959
Opwr Mlme (:nalpw
1230
1— naw a S... •
649 731 V
974.251 W
663.715 W
$,514 4
166,000 00
1240
26114408 Mmty wnanl lnr Ppnl S4.vcw1
6500616
$.04061
15.56900
4,08122
26,19111
1248
L911wOV9,annnsCn.,Q-sm ofY
1000
16000
400
610000
woo
1750
TOT AL OPI IM WINS INAIMM 5
.
6842%96
.......... ............
92/341111
............
48.84300
------------
4482692
861.610/6
I OT AL Um IN 1 m t KP1 N5t ICMCWMtl)
.......................................................
41.,3096
................................
93020202
41.04300
41 W79
......................
9/05""
Y I n
Y T D
INXMT
Y I O
Y I D
Op«wlp Rwnvlua
Iotm
TOTAL
14t34K3
TOTAL
IOIN
1440
Paa4anpn I pr
WIN N
4.24 4
$9.60,00
910.11 10
91, .15 4
IS4I6
TOTAL DIS HAINO W Yt MM IC41ru41tl1
4'8546
4'44
469100
91041110
6114154
Al VI NUI tit 110.3 ti
.......................................................
MM.11 MAIM
137771
610776
$649
642 VII
I AIM IM VI MII
"Am
4591
110.411
611 416
,:III IA. 10 VI NIII
916011
611776
614191
! 616 WA
,Nr1
f/Xnu I Q..,— 1 w«,w
W w
6000
400
60 W
8400 W
154
IOIAI I. A141AI I R4`1XM 91CM u,Mtll
low
6000
400
60W
*SW W
(IPwI M•,p
Ilt .
.......................................................
TAO
11441 4.1141. "1 P4wr1pn11fkwv-1
11401
7116
ISSm
IUV
I%805
T10
O1%AB110
4m
85
840
I10
14
2511
FI IM W Y 55.
5671
1361
63M
6114
73V
7112
AIR$ 19,16 441
7011
1621
3319
1260
Am
7614
CIW IMM N
4016
1619
5701
364
446
7AIA
EX MAMI W MY INW
,T4M
1116
IMW
147V
1146
AID
101 WIW.f IM KIN%
7W4
1140
75W
77.0
7500
7640
11..V91.NM-y.I4.—. L.. wl
?MW
,46(26)
TON.
7417
I744r
fnr4.4wwpn
M 61
84 1.
64 33
64 37
6457
426
4/1
1010
6011
4/3
I —a-
V A
V W
V 1,
was
W I I
1 ,rn«nn
676 13
626 49
Lim
676 61
841 f/
1411~
11726
1431%
1661%
111E
I'awnyw14411.
OM
OM
OAI70
048
OM
I•a444+Ww,nw,.0
611
684
6
684
674
MANAGEMENT PLAN
MONTICELLO HEARTLAND EXPRESS 1993-1994
A. ORGANIZATION
The Heartland Express is organized and monitored by the City of Monticello
under a contractual arrangement with Hoglund Transportation of Monticello.
The 1994 management plan, contract bid specifications. and budget are based
on the service demand and delivery experience gathered during 3 1/2 years of
ser-6ce. Selection of the service provider for budget year 1994 resulted from
a formal bidding process conducted in the fall of 1992.
Hoglund Transportation operates the Monticello Heartland Express and is
responsible fur the day to day operation of the transit program. Gordy
Hoglund, owner of Hoglund Transportation, is responsible for the day to day
management and operation of the transit system.
The service provider is responsible for hiring, establishing wages, and
terminatingall employees working on conjunction with the Heartland Express.
The City of Monticello's Assistant Administrator, .Jeff O'Neill, will represent
the applicant in negotiating an assistance contract with the state. The
Assistant Administrator, with the assistance of the Bookkeeper and Computer
Analyst, will he responsible for monitoring the ongoing operation of the system
and will assist the MunticelloTransportation Advisory Committee and the City
Council in development of the Monticello transportation system operation
policy. In addition, the Monticello Transporwtion Advisory Committee will
provide marketing and operations support for the program in the firm of in-
kind contributions of time.
Hoglund 'transportation, as the present transportation service provider,
currently provides bus service to the Monticello School District and to other
organizations. The transportation company staff consists of 735 drivers and I
dispatcher. Two employees in addition to existing; staff have been employed
to service the contract with the City of Monticello. Of the additional staff
required, one is it full-time driver and ono works part-time. Each part-time
driver works approximately len hours per week.
The transportation service provider is responsible far filing required reports to
the Transportation Regulation Board.
11. I'RO-11,"CT COATS AND O11JEC1'IVES
COALS: The main goal for 1994 is to maintain a client hese through
delivery of an efficient and efTective transportation service.
MGNTPLAN.94: 7/9/93 Page I of 8
I . Cost EOiciencv
Establish a service level designed to encourage ridership while
maintaining reasonable operating costs through efficient use of
emnloyees and a sinvlr• 25 nq,¢Pnnnr �tehirlo.
1994 Projected Estimated miles: 32,441
1994 Projected Cost per mile: $2.17
1994 Projected Hours per employee: 1.250
2. Service Effectiveness
Target elderly and handicapped markets with a variety of marketing
campaigns to attract initial ridership. Establish user oriented system
featuring a minimal call ahead requirement of one hour.
Achieve a ratio of .48 passengers per mile.
3. Cost Effectiveness
Hake efficient use of transit dollars by establishing cost per passenger
at $4.52.
Establish revenue to cost ratio of 16.18'/,.
C. LEVELS OF SERVICE
1. Service Area and Population
The Monticello Heartland Express is intended to service the population
residing within the city ol'iMonticello, the areas immediately adjacent to
the city known as the Orderly Annexation Area, and a portion of Dig
Lake and Rvelter Townships, which are populated areas lying adjacent
to Monticello across the Mississippi River and within the Monticello
School District boundaries. The population of the city of Monticello is
estimated at 5.200. The Orderly Annexation Area and township area
population is estimated to be 4,000. These ureas are outlined on
Exhibit A.
Transportation to the Dig Lake Nutrition Center from points in
Monticello will be provided once a day during the noon hours.
Transportation to and from Kjellbergs West Mobile Home Park, which
is outside the city limits, is now being offered. Also, transportation to
churches and businesses located in the township but directly adjacent
D1CNT1'I.AN.94: 7/9/93 Page 2 of 8 (o
to the city is provided at no added charge. The cost per ride directly to
individual mobile home units within the Kjellbergs West Park costs $2
per ride. No other transportation outside the areas mentioned is
anticipated.
As a new service in 1994, the bus will pick up riders delivered to the
Nutrition Center by the Sherburne County Heartland Express. These
riders will then be transported to Monticello for shopping, doctor
appointments, etc., and then transported back to Big Lake in
conjunction with the Nutrition Center pickup. This service will be
provided on Wednesdays only on an experimental basis.
Of primary importance is mai ntenance of a transportation service level
that is attractive to city of Monticello riders, as the City of Monticello
is the primary source of local revenue for this program. Therefore,
except for service outside the city noted above. Extension of
transportation service to areas outside the Monticello city limits will be
phased in as the service demand and concurrent impact un service
delivery becomes better understood. Extension of service level beyond
city limits will be considered by the City Council when it can be
demonstrated that service expansion will not diminish capability of the
system to offer a desirable service level to Monticello citizens. In
addition, it must be demonstrated that the City portion of the cost to
deliver service to the outlying areas can be recovered through a
combination of user fees and through added cost efficiency created by
new ridership. At such timt: that the bus service is expanded into
outlying areas, the City Council of Monticello will establish bus fares
that reflect the added cost of servicing outlying areas that do not
contribute to the local share revenue generated by taxation.
2. Tune of Service to be Operated
The City µill administer through contract a "dial a ride" service which
will feature a minimum one hour call ahead requirement. The program
marketing effort will stress the importance of calling ahead sooner than
one hour before the ride is needed.
3. Da vs (if narration
The City will be providing 2,600 hours of service between January 1,
1994, and December 31, 1994, which is equal t,) 10 -hour a day service,
five days per week, not incl uding holidays. Sunday service may he
provided during the months of January, February, March, November,
and December. Service is to be provided between the hours of 3:15 a.m.
and 10:30 a.m. This service will he provided if the total cost is funded
via private donations. Any hours ah-ove 2,500 will he funded entirely by
the group or organization requesting the service. On the average, 9 -
hour -a -day service is planned for Monday through Friday.
MGNTI'L.AN.94: 7/9/93 Page 3 of 8 �,
In addition, if additional revenue becomes available, such funds could
be used to expand transportation hours. The cost to operate the bus
beyond the basic 10 -hour day would be financed entirely by the local
share. Source of such funds might include donations from the Lions
Club, M.S. Society. City of Montirolln, nr others.
Hours of Operation
The budget calls for a total of 2,500 service hours per year. These hours
will be used as follows:
Summer month hours of operation - 8:15 a.m. to 5 p.m. plus .2.5
hours/day for bus prep time results in 8 hours per day. Total
summer hours equal to 1,000.
Winter month hours of operation - 8:15 a.m. to 5 p.m. plus .25/day
for bus prep results in 9 hours per day. Total winter hours equal
to 1,125.
Surplus hours equal difference between total summer and winter
scheduled hours minus budget amount (:375 hours) µill be used
for special events and used'to bring a second bus on line during
peak demand periods.
D. FARES
The proposed fare structure calls for a base fare of $1.00 per one-way ride.
This fare will apply to all city of Monticello riders, including elderly, children
over the age of 6, and able-bodied adults. Children under 6 years of age may
ride free with a parent or guardian. Reduced fires will be available to all
potential users of the system through the purchase of ticket books. Reduced
fares can be obtained when tickets are purchased in hulk through ticket books
per the following table:
Base rate: $ 1.00
10 -ride ticket book $ 7.50 ($.75 ride)
40 -ride ticket book $25.00 ($.62 ride)
Bus drivers will sell ticket books on the bus but will not make change for
individuals paying the base fare.
'ticket books will be sold on the bus, at city hall, the senior center, and at the
school district offices. The City Bookkeeper will he responsible for coordinating
ticket printing, distributing ticket books, and collecting ticket book revenue.
MGNTPLAN.94: 7/9/93 Page 4 of 8 b
Fare structure for outlying areas shall be established by the City Council at
such time that it is determined that it is feasible to serve outlying areas.
MARKETING
A major thrust of the marketing effort will be focused on the primary
users of the system, which are the elderly and handicapped.
Approximately 750 citizens over 60 years of age reside within the city
of Monticello, of which a significant portion participate in programs
offered by the local Senior Citizen Center. This center will be a major
trip destination point and will also be the primary distribution point for
marketing information regarding the program. Successful development
of the senior market will occur if the Senior Center resources are
properly used in promoting the program. In 1993, approximately 48%
of the users included elderly and handicapped.
The remainder of the transit market includes mostly children. In 1993
it was found that children utilized the system in ccinjunction with after
school and summer recreation activities. In 1993, approximately 26%,
of the ridership consisted of children. Continued marketing efforts will
he made to communicate the service to this segment of the population
through cooperative efforts with the school district.
Twenty percent of the local households are considered to be "low income"
as defined by the State of Minnesota DepartmentofTrade and Economic
Development. This represents approximately :340 households within the
city of Monticello. A portion of these households utilize the bus
transportation program for economic reasons. An additional focus of the
marketing effort will include communicating the program to this group
through standard means and through organizations that have frequent
contact with this segment of the population. Local social services such
as the food shelf, the "WIC" program, Wright County Social Services,
and local churches will be utilized as the medium by which the program
can be marketed to this special group.
Much of the work force that resides within Monticello commutes to
points well outside the city limits.
2. Markelinu Conceut
Standard methods for promoting the transportation system will be
utilized. The City of Monticello will strive toward development of an
efficient marketing program by utilizing many of the techniques now in
place in other communities. Such techniques may include but not be
limited to the following:
A9CNTPLAN.94: 7I9hJ3 Page 5 of 8
Of secondary importance in development of an advertising
campaign is utilization of the local newspaper. A series of
advertisements may be developed to promote the system.
* Continued development and refinement of information brochures
describing the transportation service. Brochures will be
distributed to various organizations for further distribution.
* Development of an attractive image by maintaining a clean and
attractive bus. Service image will focus on providing "coach"
service rather than bus service.
* Clean and efficient operation of the transportation service will be
goals which will allow the system to market itself through word
of mouth advertising.
* Local schools and the local library will be asked to participate in
marketing availability of service to youngsters.
* The new city newsletter will become an important tool for
advertising the system.
* Posters will be used to a greater extent to advertise the bus.
* A larger sign/dial-a-ride phone number will be painted on the bus
for maximum exposure.
3. Morket.ine Plan Cost/Benefit
The proposed marketing plan is relatively inexpensive in terms of cost
of advertising and supplies; however, it does require considerable effort
in terms of man-hours. Much of the marketing efTurt requires personal
contact and one-to-one advocacy which is likely to reap significant
rewards in ternis of ridership. Fortunately, volunteers and man-hours
are available to sufficiently market the service to groups and service
organizations.
COORDINATION WITH EXISTING TRANSIT OPERATIONS
The degree in which this program is coordinated with the Annandale
Heartland Express and the Sherburne County Heartland Express is limited.
On occasion ❑ Monticello rider will he transferred to a Sherburne County
system vehicle for transport to points in Sherburne County. This type of
occurrence is rattier rare. Likewise, on occasion a Sherburne County rider is
transported to it drop-ofTpoint in the Monticello transit area, with the
MGNTPLAN.94: 7/9/93 Page 6 of 8
Monticello system then transporting the individual to a specific point in the
city. In sum, system integration and coordination is not emphasized.
Discussions between the three transportation providers in this area are now
underway with the goal of improving system integration and efficiency.
As noted earlier, the Monticello Heartland Express will be operating a once -a -
week shuttle service to Big Lake and back in an effort to provide better service
to more people in a cost effective manner.
The Monticello Heartland Express will be, coordinated with an existing
volunteer driver transportation program originating from Wright County.
Coordination of transportation service will allow volunteer resources to be used
for other longer distance driving duties such as transporting individuals to
metro locations and back.
G. EXPENSE CONTRACT
New, revised expense contract with the service provider was established in
October 1992. This contract is attached.
H. REVENUE CONTRACTS
From time to time, requests are made by various organizations for Monticello
Heartland Express service outside the standard hours of service. Financing
of the hourly cost and mileage of added service is provided by the organization
requesting the service. Such service is provided to all residents and out for the
exclusive use by the organization requesting service.
1. CAPI'T'AL IMPKOVEA1EN'N
Purchase of a $500 cellular phone is planned for 1994.
J. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
The City shall monitor and enforce the terms of the transportation service
expense contruct, which includes u vehicle maintenance program requirement
that is consistent with state requirements. Please see the transportation
service expense contract for details.
K. DRIVER SELECTION
The City shall monitor and enforce the terms of the transportation service
expense contract, which includes a driver selection process that is consistent
with sate requirements. Please see the transportation service expense
contract for details.
MONTPLAN.94: 7/9193 Page 7 of 8 )
L. INSURANCE
The City shall monitor and enforce the terms of the transportation service
expense contract, which includes an insurance requirement that is consistent
v.ith state requirements. Please see the trans porta Gua service expense
contract for details.
M. TIME DISTRIBUTION RECORD
The City shall monitor and enforce the terms of the transportation service
expense contract, which includes maintenance of time distribution records in
a manner that is consistent with state requirements. Please see the
transportation service expense contract for details.
MGNTPLAN.94: 7/9/93 Page 8 of 8
MONTICELLO HEARTLAND EXPRESS BUDGET SYSTEM NARRATIVE
Personal Services
The Monticello Heartland Express budget calls for administrative, management, and
supervisory services in the amount of $2,869. This amount will pay for time spent
working on the system by the Assistant Administrator, Computer Analyst, and
Bookkeeper.
Fringe benefits in the personal services category amount to $.556. Total personal
services expense is projected at $3,426.
Administrative Charges
Under tariffs and traffic expenses, it is projected that the City will spend $200 on
tickets to be used in conjunction with the transportation program, and $600 for
advertising. The budget includes $200 for legal fees and $140 for miscellaneous
travel expenses, which results in a total of $1,140 budgeted for administrative
charges.
Vehicle Charges
Gasoline and oil purchases made by the transportation service provider is covered
under vehicle charges. Based on a projected total mileage of 32,441, it is expected
that gasoline costs will amount to $4,319. This amount includes the $.20 mr gallon
gas tax credit.
Ooerat.ions Charges
The City has entered into a contract with Hoglund Coach Lines for services to he
delivered in 1994. The purchase of service rate through the contract is $22 lour.
The management plan calls for 2,500 hours of transportation service, which results
in a pmjccted purchase of service charge of $55,000. In addition, a mileage/
maintenance expense of $.18 per mile is included in the operations charge, which is
estimated at $6,662. Total operations charges amount to $61,662.
Insurance Charges
Hoglund Coach Lines, as transportation provider, is required to provide insurance
coverage in the amounts of at least $1,000,000 per claim and at least $100,000 per
occurrence. The operator also provides comprehensive coverage for each vehicle and
collision coverage to provide replacement funds in the event of suhstantial loss.
MN/I)0T and the City of Monticello are included as additional named insured un the
operator's insurance. All insurance charges are thus paid by the contractor and arc
part of the purchase of service fee.
BUDGET94.NAR: 7/9/93 Page 1 of 2
Taxes and Fees
No funds have been budgeted for taxes and fees, as no such expenses are expected
given the design of the Monticello Heartland Express.
Total Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses for the Monticello Heartland Express program during the
12 -month period from January 1, 1994, to December 31, 1994, is projected to equal
$70,546.
Operating Revenues
It is expected that passenger fares, including revenue contracts, will amount to
$11,416 based on a projected ridership of 15,605.
Capital Expenses
A replacement of the existing cellular phone is planned for 1994 at an estimated ..st
of $500.
Budget Summary
For the 12 -month period from January 1, 1993, to December 31, 1993, it is expected
that capital expenses will amount to $500. Operational expenses will amount to
$70,546. Fare revenue will amount to $1 1,416, which creates a total operating deficit
of $59,131.
BUDGET94.NAR: 7/9/93 Page 2 of 2 ((� /
RESOLUTION 93
Resolved that the City of Monticello enter into Contract Number with
the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, to provide public
transportation service in Monticello.
Further resolved that the City of Monticello agrees to provide 40% of the total
operating cost from local funds and 20% of the total capital costs. Further resolved
that authorization to execute the aforementioned Contract and any amendments
thereto is hereby given to the Assistant City Administratoror the City Administrator.
Further resolved that the Assistant Administrator or the City Administrator
is authorized to execute requests for reimbursement from the Minnesota Department
of Transportation.
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and correct copy of the
resolution presented to and adopted by the City of Monticello at a duly authorized
meeting thereof held on the 12th day of July, 1993, as shown by the minutes of said
meeting in my possession.
Rick Wolfsteller
City Administrator
Council Agenda - 7/12J93
Review the Oak Ridge subdivision grading and drainage plan. (.1.0.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Representatives from Monticello Township have requested the opportunity to
outline their concerns regarding the Oak Ridge grading and drainage plan. As
you may know, both the County and the Township are concerned about the
effect of the project on properties located along ditch 33. Likewise, the City is
concerned about downstream impact of this project. That is why we have
required that the developer prepare a plan that does not result in downstream
impact greater than that which currently exists. The purpose of this agenda
item is to receive input from the Township regarding their specific concerns
and to discuss these concerns with Council and the City Engineer. The
developer and his engineer have also been notified of this discussion and will
attend at their discretion.
would also like to add that on the following Tuesday, the County Board will
he considering whether or not to approve the Oak Ridge grading and drainage
plan. City staff, including the City Engineer and perhaps the City Attorney,
will he present at the meeting to provide the County Board with information
that might assist the Board in its decision making.
COUNCIL UPDATE
July 8, 199:3
Countv Road 75 (East Broadwav) Reconstruction. 1R.W.1
Bauerly Brothers Construction has recently been awarded the contract for repaving
the eastbound lanesofCounty Road 75 (Broadway) between Highway Z5 and the high
school. Bauerly Brothers is apparently very interested in starting and completing the
project as soon as possible, and it appears that they will he starting the construction
on Wednesday, July 14. It is estimated the project will take three weeks to complete
providing the weather cooperates.
Update on Outlot A. Country Club Manor. (R.W.)
Recently City Attorney, Paul Weingarden, hits been working on the legal process of
obtaining a clear title to Outlot A on behalf of the Monticello HKA. This is the
property that the City received in lieu of speciul assessment debt through the tax
forfeiture process from Wright County.
The process is nearing completion, and the City should he obtaining it clear title
through the quiet title action through District Court.
In a related matter, the City has been working with Whiteco Sign Company
concerning the four billboards that tyre located on this property. I have requested
that lease agreements he provided for the four signs on it one-year annual renewal
basis and that the City receive the same rental fees that Whitecu Sign Company was
paying the previous property owner, Marvin George. For your information, the total
projected sign revenue for the first year would M* $H,521.79, and each year-to-year
renewal would have a 4'7. escalator clause built in.
COUNCIL UPDATE
July 9, 1993
Following is an update on a variance request that was acted on by the
Planning Commission on 716/93. The variance request was approved per
alternative q2. If you have any objection to Planning Commission action,
please tell me so I can place the item on the next Council agenda.
Planning Conunissioil Agenda • 7/6/93
Public Hearing --Consideration of a variance request to allow the
develonmenl of a temporary emplovee parking lot with no curb,
gutter, or hoard surfacing. Iwx:alion is Block I. Loi 2, aandherm South
Addition. Auolicant, Buffalo Clinic Building Partnership, W.O.t
REFERENCE AND 11ACKCROUND:
The Buffalo Clinic 13uilding Partnership requests that the City grant a
variance to the parking lot design standards in order tc allow for development
of a temporary parking area. The parking area is intended to serve employee
parking and is proposed for construction in anticipation of development of an
addition to the huilding. Linda Dirks, representing the clinic, stated that on
occasion parking on the street has been necessary due to the high demand for
parking stalls.
The temporary parking area will he rough graded and class V gravel will he
used as it hale for the parking arca. It will he located in the general location
of the future long-term parking area.
This situation is somewhat unique. its the Hurt Clinic already has sufficient
parking to nice( city code. The temporary parking developed will he surplus
parking that. will he used by employees only.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
Mutitm to deny it variance allowing development of it temporary
employee parking lot without curb, gutter, or hard surfacing.
Under this alternative, the Planning Commission could take the view
thin since the temporary parking area is going to he in it locution of the
permanent parking area, it dues not make sense Lo waive our normal
standards. The City has no guarantee that the temporary parking
would he upgraded to meet city standards. Ry allowing the temporary
parking to occur without meeting the standards under the premise that
it will he upgraded to meet city requirements in the future sets fairly
significant precedent. Obviously, there will hie others that will request
Lhis type of allowance in the future if the Pity grants it in this case.
2. Motion to grant the valiance allowrag development of it temporary
employee parking lot with no curb and gutter or hard surfacing
contingent on the following:
The temporary parking arca roust meet code within one year of
the, date of construction.
2. Signs must. be displayed stating "employe parking only."
Planning Commission Agenda - 7/6/93
Planning Commission could take the position that the request is
reasonable and that there is sufficient assurance that the parking lot
wiii be ultimately cieveiuped to meet city standards: therefore, a
variance could be granted which would allow short-term use of a
parking area that dues not meet city standards. Perhaps under this
alternative, the Planning Commission may wish to put a deadline for
completion of the parking area and/or request, that the property owner
provide a performance hand in the amount equal to complete the
parking area as a guarantee to the City that the parking lot will be
completed to meet city requirements within a certain time frame.
Another factor which might encourage the Planning Commission to
grant approval is the fact that the clinic has sufficient parking area for
patrons and that the temporary parking area would he used by
employees only. Planning Commission could Lake the view that since
the clinic provides the full requirement for parking, it dues not impair
the intent of the ordinance to allow additional surplus parking that does
not meet city standards. The fact that a full complement of parking
spaces is available at the clinic and the suhstandard parking area is
temporary for employees only will serve to mitigate the precedent that
is set. Future applicants cannot point U) this situation as a precedent,
unless the applicant already has met the hard surface parking
requirement.
C. sTAFF RVCOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the variance
allowing the temporary parking area to be constructed hosed on the finding
that the variance dues not impair the intent of the ordinance because the clinic
already has parking area sufficient to meet city requirements. It, is our view
that Planning Commission should set a deadline for completion of the parking
area and require that signs he posted a(, the entrance to the temporary parking
that it is for employees only. Il. is our opinion that the term of the variance
should not exceed one year.
SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of site plan showing proposed temporary parking area.
HART
L;O
J
�7(i.Sr"q PoRkM�
Lor
SRvDbeR9 Ro
W#
0
D
Q
W
(DSra;p Ap)-Rox, Y-s"rpm
Q SNApa V All S„69aale To
d p4oee 9,0 &-?.4cT 6'/
C1,.,S 5 8ASE 9R--Ck
yd Ro-p Exlar.'j Toyso;t T
e4e of GRA,,el S-4iace
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
b
"4
(J[ V (M MONI I(;1
t 1 O MON 1111 V Hllll (AMi (Il PANIMI
NI F41 PONT
MMIh,f Jure 1993
F7 NMI I S 6 USF 9
IAn
filo
S.—M—
INY Vyr
Inr•Vyr
11 IMI I ISSUED U—
MAV MOn1n
JUNE
lap Vyr
to 0916
to (A t,
WF Al* IIAI.
N.m
16
1]
1
72
16
VAlungn
1214,200 00
613.900 m
6196,600 00
11.26•.100 00
61.6",600 00
•
a•663390
a,
Su.crurpy
118935
123565
69205
y11SS
COMMERCIAL
NumpN
6
a
5
11
16
VAIUNan
1233.50000
11100000
1579.90000
6904,2mm
6316.90000
Iw
61,91531
613100
/a06213
"5"29
62.98951
S.'".066
6116 15
$500
6269 10
651 35
$ I S 1 15
INUUSTRAl
NVn0•
3
VNUAAm
/219.56300
63"10000
12915W00
f w
S2,09215
62,"9 31
92,230 15
$urcnA WA
91?9 71
1112 m
1145 ]9
PI LM91N(i
Nur1Vw
5
]
5
N
30
F w
SW 00
615000
$12900
869300
1151 on
Swtnn9y
6250
9350
6250
11200
11500
O111ENS
Num n
23
V•IlrNrm
Wm
1000
9000
656.90000
I.6•
WOW
•1900
/3000
61sow
Surr nNw
1100
1050
9150
67920
IUFAI EIN IMUS
;10
30
72
111
133
IUTAF VAI(1AWN
•ltl.. 300
/464.9UOm
$76650000
62.517.00000
/2.513,96300
1OI At IFFS
/6.98961
6,01601
$6103 31 31
119.919"
621,126]1
IOIAI SURCHAFKlF4
136339
WS 15
N6 M
91.211 00
11,2699
-ANWNt 61(IN1N
/EF9
NIM9EH IU 8911
14-1 NA 1111p
Numlyr
/YrnM
9�nr�
VYUAI.n
lnH Vyr 1-Vyr
W�p.i •..rnr
]
/3)N 11
iV 61
S. 30000
T
16
IArP1•.
l'
0
6W. I N.ur1
0
0
I;Ivnm•r1 rNl
1
7
1Muprrn
1
n
IAr 1•A' Aum
1
/20 00
61 00
62 mo m
1
•
Sr�rr
0
0
2
0
Al I I IIA 1It MNp 11A111
9
IM31 W
61900
6390mm
1
y
913100
9600
H1 omm
•]
9
narrN�Y
7
1
Ali I.—
1
$,"W
63891
91)
f0
po
Act.f %mm,
911pN'11M51 9
N..n.nr.W Irra•
u
u
lar Aa
1
9FSm
W60
61 wow
9
12
11 M1'lp4Nr R I31F 1
IM AMAlINN1
7
SNM
SIM
Wm
2
0
1
II11A11
30
M 0160
62A4 15
689 90900
113
111
PERMIT
CITY OF MONTICELLO INDIVIDUAL PERMIT ACTIVITY REPORT
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
93-2051
Imenor rernooel
93- 2055
m
Baseent Nmsn
93-2056
(ura9e YiQ,Herq
93-2057
nlenor remodell�
93-2058
Deticneo 9.,.9e
93-2059
et.
93-2060
Ouse
93-2061
House 4 OIL 1>• re2rdn9
93-2062
M t hmW
f15 00
�0 5/0
K(�,nserl.
2063
ipuN r9lvfw
2061
�-wson 1
93-2065
.J1d.r9rourldFnA removal
93-
Dose 6 r
93-
I.IMpr NVW. hnNn
93-2066
W -W 1 N.
f2 000 00
House A gwkFvp.
U93.2069
202071
�,r a13•.p•'t—, dlmMnpn
Y� 4 -
nose reroo70
93-2072
Pu. rell,wo, gvninl'Yon
93-2073
�1..N p11
93-2071
NauN
93-2075
House 6 9411wo reroor
932076
--w r..rdn9
:386 11
.7ir REVIEW
p
House�
Y�
House +� y
$530
53 75
INOJN �-.
•
INYuaa
INouN
p6�
�
+.1
NOyN
9kr--"
-2df
IHouN Iser -I•
11111.10 �", HomeYS I11 Malla,e Lane f67 7DO 00 9411 73 $33 95 S I Maurrtw Jannson,116 HOkleu RO $,1 000 DO $12600 $1,
weaion OH 4prllparl Inu6 W Bro6Os.r 61 500 61500 f0 50
yy.tua R�• owns. S 1 Magm ppr f5B 500 N07 17 f29 2S
(bused. M re,r F/Q1� S� s6 000 00 tel o0 $300
L.on.,d �elvr,y Jr +I (' {�( 11 5t 66. 000 00 14% 75 :32 00
�rt R1p��} 1314 $In $63 'DO 00 94 10 f3, 55
^r yl { E Ilan F�srlpa . �� E R,vw SI f0 00 f 10 DO f0 50
nn. FIMNV6U, w em 1L i � 3V'y- 3c i I5 OO iC
llC S(v 0, MonNc•Ila 1 I M/ Aryl, SI f0 00 $1000 $050
.F VaIW PIu• Humeel5124 J., $5760000 $5760000 9403 j B 60
ase,. h N ' 1� ony vi $68 115y�Q�fp(0;�i� DO Nab QQ� �•. DS
s I .fuse, :6�I Mli 6 5. 1
��,a.l :2� � iS
TOTALS N :] :?., 65
-e NW Ply! f auWL• Nrr AEA p,
'•IW Wu. (Ion1e.! I Sl.il,n9 U
,r
7
TOT %Pj/3lFgfylEjV"
$23 00 $050
$2300 $050
$24 00 $050
$20 00 $050
}1
3 00 $c w
300 Soso
$I6900 $350
CITY OF MONTICELLO INDIVIDUAL PERMIT ACTIVITY REPORT
Monro o1 Jum 1993
FEES
TYPEH1
/1VFfLOCATION
VALUATION
PERMIT
SURCHAygG/E PLUMBING SURCHARGE'
11C
Wlalnu, Plara/206 W 3rd SIl
i1 500 00
f15 00
�0 5/0
$leve 6 Penny irM�eery 155 Nepm.n Lane
f 1 ,Do DO
f I S DO
$050
A1Y1C,
arw Dunn ntQIpwG06 East 71:0 $I
S' 500 O0
515 00
5n 50
AC
ar9yene Ban. onnceem200 wen ti SI
f2 000 00
f20 00
S, 00
RG
1V.IIam ILeann11335 WAM R., St lot 6
f2 DOD 00
S20 DO
S, DO .
GVr Aan f B Mr SIS Munn D,
f 1 500 00
$1500
DO
f0 50
atw Plus dome ling
:53 300 00
:386 11
f?6 BS $23 00 $050
D
awram:e6 Nancy Sprv� t�� River 51
Dennn A Pemcq Taylor/� MiseF.pp, DI
$t060000
67 50000
S,� 0
50
$530
53 75
11111.10 �", HomeYS I11 Malla,e Lane f67 7DO 00 9411 73 $33 95 S I Maurrtw Jannson,116 HOkleu RO $,1 000 DO $12600 $1,
weaion OH 4prllparl Inu6 W Bro6Os.r 61 500 61500 f0 50
yy.tua R�• owns. S 1 Magm ppr f5B 500 N07 17 f29 2S
(bused. M re,r F/Q1� S� s6 000 00 tel o0 $300
L.on.,d �elvr,y Jr +I (' {�( 11 5t 66. 000 00 14% 75 :32 00
�rt R1p��} 1314 $In $63 'DO 00 94 10 f3, 55
^r yl { E Ilan F�srlpa . �� E R,vw SI f0 00 f 10 DO f0 50
nn. FIMNV6U, w em 1L i � 3V'y- 3c i I5 OO iC
llC S(v 0, MonNc•Ila 1 I M/ Aryl, SI f0 00 $1000 $050
.F VaIW PIu• Humeel5124 J., $5760000 $5760000 9403 j B 60
ase,. h N ' 1� ony vi $68 115y�Q�fp(0;�i� DO Nab QQ� �•. DS
s I .fuse, :6�I Mli 6 5. 1
��,a.l :2� � iS
TOTALS N :] :?., 65
-e NW Ply! f auWL• Nrr AEA p,
'•IW Wu. (Ion1e.! I Sl.il,n9 U
,r
7
TOT %Pj/3lFgfylEjV"
$23 00 $050
$2300 $050
$24 00 $050
$20 00 $050
}1
3 00 $c w
300 Soso
$I6900 $350