City Council Agenda Packet 09-13-1993AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Monday, September 13, 1893 • 7 p.m.
Mayor: Ken Maus
Council Members: Shirley Anderson, Brad Fyle, Clint Herbst, Patty Olsen
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of the minutes of the regular meeting held August 23, 1993, and
the special meeting held August 31, 1993.
3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints.
4. Consideration of a request to amend Section 3-31CJ of the Monticello Zoning
Ordinance by changing the R-1 (single family residential) side yard setback
requirement from ten (10) feet on both side yards to six (6) feet on one side
and ten (10) feet on the other side. Applicant, Tony Emmerich.
5. Consideration of a request to amend Chapter 10 of the Monticello Zoning
Ordinance by adding a provision that would increase the maximum size
allowed for private garages accessory to a residential use in a PZM
(performance zone mixed) zone. Applicant, Randy Ruff.
(76..
Consideration of a conditional use request ti) allow open and outdoor storage
as an accessory use in an 1-2 (heavy industrial) zone and a variance request
to allow a forty (40) foot curb cut. Applicant, H -Window company.
7. Consideration of leasing a portion of 5th Street right-of-way to Sunny Fresh
Foods for development of a paved parking area.
R. Review Community United Methodist Church proposal for placement of a
12' x 52' temporary classroom on site.
C 9. ! Consideration to authorize Business Development tierviLes, Inc., (BDS, Inc.)
to prepare fart 11 of the State's Economic Recovery Fund Application and to
call for a public hearing.
10. Consideration of u resolution supporting Wright County's proclamation of
Waste Reduction Week, September 27 to October 2, 1993.
11. Consideration of a resolution calling for a public hearing for the installation
of a pond outlet from Meadow Oaks to the Mississippi River.
12. Consideration of a resolution calling for a public hearing for assessments on
the Briar Oakes pond outlet --City Project 93-10C.
13. Adjournment.
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 31, 1893 - 7 p.m.
Members Present: Ken Maus, Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Patty Olsen
Members Absent: Brad Fyle
Review vreliminary results of hospital district facility site olannine•
Mayor Maus opened the meeting and welcomed those in attendance which
included: Monticello HRA, Planning Commission, Monticello -Big Lake
Hospital District Board, staff, and residents living near the hospital district
campus. Mayor Maus noted that the ongoing expansion of the hospital district
has resulted in land use conflicts that need to addressed. Issues that the study
addresses include: providing sufficient parking and adequate access to the
site; reducing impact on the adjacent residential areas; identifying the best
location for future uses, such as senior housing on the site; and finding the
best location for a heliport. These issues need to be addressed before further
expansion of the site can occur.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill noted that the preliminary study resulted from
meetings between hospital district and City representatives in a work group
setting. The purpose of this meeting is to communicate some of the
preliminary ideas established by the work group, and obtain feedback from the
governing bodies and the local neighborhood.
City Planner Steve Grittman and his associate Liz Stockman, reviewed their
report. In their review, they identified site issues and an ultimate concept
plan which addressed the site issues identified. They also reviewed an interim
concept plan that shows a phased approach to achieving the ultimate concept
plan. A copy of the report is incorporated into the meeting minutes and
attached hereto. Discussion ensued.
Individuals from the neighborhood were concerned that the concept plan
showed that the River Street access to the hospital district campus would
remain open. City Planner Steve Grittman responded by saying that access
to River Street will remain open, but the driveway design is intended to
discourage use of the River Street access. Grittman explained that the River
Street access is necessary, because it provides a secondary way for emergency
vehicles to enter the site.
Page 1
Special Council Minutes - 8/31/93
Harold Pittman expressed his concern that a heliport was not identified on the
short-term plan. Steve Grittman noted that Federal Aviation Administration
requirements limit the location of the heliport to a position directly in front or
west of the hospital structure. Placement of the heliport at either
locationwould result in the loss of many parking spaces and would limit drive
areas. At present, the site is 45 stalls short of having the parking it needs.
Placement of the heliport in the areas proposed for parking would greatly
increase the parking deficiency; therefore, the heliport was not included in the
short-term plan. Grittman noted that 12 - 17 take -off and landings occur each
year and that the hospital district needs to determine if this level of use
justifies the taking of so many parking spaces. Under the ultimate plan,
future building expansion could include development of a rooftop heliport.
A concern was noted that the ultimate plan called for development of a parking
ramp, which is very expensive. Steve Grittman concurred that parking ramps
are very expensive. However, the site has limited capacity for continued
development of parking at grade level and that at some point, in order for
building expansion to occur, parking will need to be provided for on a ramp.
Grittman also noted that the topography of the site is perfectly suited for
development of a parking ramp. Ken Maus requested that the Planner provide
further detail as to how much more building area can he constructed on the
present site before a parking ramp needs to be constructed.
Phil White was concerned that the interim plan did not provide for direct
access to the dental clinic. He was concerned that his facility would become
an island in the hospital district property. Steve Grittman noted that access
easements will need to be granted to allow the interim plan to be executed.
It was also suggested that the interim plan parking arrangement be modified
to allow a more direct access to the clinic site through the proposed hospital
parking area.
After discussion, Assistant Administrator O'Neill closed the meeting by noting
that the Hospital Board and the City Council will have the opportunity to meet
separately to review the plan in detail and consider its endorsement.
There being no further discussion, the meeting was adjourned.
Jeff O'Neill
Assistant Administrator
Page 2
9
Council Agenda - 9/13/93
�• Consideration of a request to amend Section 3-S ICI of the
Monticello Zoning Ordinance by chanain¢ the R-1 (single family
residential) side vard setback requirement from ten (10) feet on
both Ride vards to six (6) feet on one side and ten (10) feet on the
other side. ADDlicant. Tonv Emmerich. W.O.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Following is a copy of the agenda supplement provided to the Planning
Commission regarding this case. For the sake of efficiency, you are being
provided the same supplement.
Planning Commission recommended denial of the proposed amendment
based on their finding that the present ordinance requiring a 10-R. setback
on both sides of a residence is proper. It was the view of the Planning
Commission that a 10 -ft setback is necessary. Reducing one side to 6 ft
would "tighten" the separation between buildings, which could result in a
negative impact on land values. Furthermore, the current standards are
reasonable, and reducing them would not he consistent with the
comprehensive plan.
Planning Commission Agenda - 9/7/93
Public Hearing --Consideration of a request to amend Section 3-3 ICJ
of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance by changing the R-1 (single family
residential) side yard setback reouirement from ten (101 feet on both
side yards to six L6) feet on one side and ten (101 feet on the other side.
Anolicant. Tonv Emmerich. (J.0.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Tony Emmerich of Emmerich Construction requests that the City amend its
ordinance by allowing a 6 foot side yard setback on one side of the property
versus 10 feet on both sides. The ordinance amendment limits the 6 foot
setback to the garage side of the structure.
This request stems from Emmerich's desire to build homes with 3 -car garages.
The home design that he commonly uses requires 64 feet of buildable frontage.
Unfortunately, our ordinance only allows 60 feet of frontage when lots are
developed to the minimum lot width of 80 feet. According to Emmerich, the
additional 4 feet that would be available would allow him to develop a home
with a 3 -car garage that would be better balanced from an architectural
standpoint. The additional 4 feet in width allows the garage to be offset
slightly more from the home making it less prominent when viewed from the
front. Without the 4 feet, more of the home is behind the garage making the
garage more of a focal point than the home. The design of the Oak Ridge
subdivision does not adequately take into account the city setback requirement;
therefore, the plat that was developed included lots designed at minimum
width standards of 80 feet. This ordinance amendment would not have been
necessary if Emmerich had simply added an additional 4 feet of width to his
lots.
Attached you will find a report submitted by Steve Grittman which provides
additional background as to the pros and cons of amending the ordinance as
proposed.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Motion to approve the zoning ordinance amendment as proposed based
on the finding that the amendment is consistent with the geography and
character of the R-1 zone and that the zoning ordinance amendment is
consistent with the comprehensive plan. Furthermore, reducing the
setback requirement on the garage side of structures in the R-1 zone
will not result in a depreciation of adjoining property values.
Under this alternative, Planning Commission is comfortable that the
Planning Commission Agenda 9n193
Motion to deny the zoning ordinance amendment based on the finding
that the zoning ordinance as presently written is correct and there is no
reason to change it at this time. Reducing the side yard setback
requirement on the garage side is not consistent with the comprehensive
plan and could result in a depreciation of property values in the R-1
zone.
Planning Commission could take the view that the present yard
requirements which include lot width minimum of 80 feet and total
square footage of 12,000 square feet and current side yard setbacks of
10 feet are up to date and provide ample room for contemporary
construction. In addition, maintaining 10 feet on both side yards creates
needed separation between structures. An argument could be made that
the developer should have designed his plat within the confines of the
existing ordinance and that it is not appropriate at this time to change
the ordinance because the developer did not plat lots wide enough to
accomodate the homes that he and his builder normally construct.
It could also be argued that if contemporary home building is now
including 3 -car garages, then perhaps the ordinance should be changed
to require that lots be platted a minimum width of 84 feet versus 80
feet.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
It is the view of city staff that the zoning ordinance should be amended as
proposed if the Planning Commission is comfortable that a 6 foot side yard
setback on the garage side of a structure will create sufficient separation.
Although city staff sympathizes with the developer and we agree that allowing
an additional 4 feet of building area will improve the architectural balance of
homes proposed, we do not feel that the ordinance should be approved if the
side yard reduction will result in long term problems.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
City Planner report; Copy of proposed zoning ordinance amendment; Copy of
e:erpts from Comprehensive Plan.
401
S E P — 2-9Z T H U 1 1: 1 9 0 P . 0 2
r Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc.
IC Y R e A N PLANNI NQ - D a e t e N• MAR K@ t 91136 A R C N
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jeff O'Neill
FROM: Stephen Orittman
DATE: 2 September 1993
RE: Monticello - Residential Setbacks
FILE NO: 191.06 - 93.04
This memorandum is in reepones to your question regarding the
proposal to reduce residential side yard setbacks from ten feet to
six feet on one side. As we discussed, setbacks are a established
as a function of other development regulations, including lot width
and area, as well as market trends and constraints. The City
should be concerned first with public welfare, but in the context
of the marketplace.
one of the market trends which is becoming a more commonplace
occurrence in single family development is the inclusion of three
car attached garages. These garages challenge the standard
buildable lot configurations in that an additional ten feet of
"accessory" structure width is added to the home. The question for
the City is how to accommodate the newer housing designs in its
plat and development review.
There are a couple of ways to address the issue. One of these is
the reduction of side yard setbacks in the manner proposed by the
developer. As we have indicated to you, this is an issue which can
have some impacts on the look and feel of a neighborhood. Although
we may cite the fact that only four feet of side yard are being
lost, the four feet comprise twenty percent of the current required
building separation, and would comprise forty percent if the six
foot yard@ were placed next to each other. We believe that this
reduces the •epaciousnese" of a neighborhood to a noticeable
degree. If this is a goal of the City's neighborhood design, then
the reduction in setback approach should be avoided.
SEP- 2-19-Z T M U 1 1: 1 9 0
P. 03
There are cities which have responded to wider housing designs by
increasing the lot width requirements, or creating stratified
zoning districts with two single family districts, one for smaller
lots and one for larger. This is not a necessary step for the
City, however. Under the current arrangement, the minimum City lot
would contain adequate buildable area for a sixty foot wide
building. There in no requirement that a developer plat minimum
width lots, of course, and a developer who wishes to build
particularly wide houses could be expected to accommodate those
structures with larger lots voluntarily.
The City should consider that the text amendment approach will
apply to all future subdivision development. It is assumed that
there are developers working in the City who may have liked the
opportunity to reduce the setbacks as well, and the City should
consider its response to any past requests in a similar vein.
pinally, you may wish to consider requiring future plat proposals
to include all setbacks to be shown on the preliminary plat. This
is not an uncommon plat review requirement and serves to notify
leas vigilant developers of the constraints of the lots which they
are platting.
in reviewing your proposed ordinance amendment, your approach with
the exception would appear to accomplish the ame-Am ente goals. It
may be that horizontal "extensional of the six foot line
established by the garage would not be precluded by the reference
to "above, or "tuck -under". You may wish to consider language for
the exception as follows:
•In the R-1 Zoning District, attached garages may be permitted
to encroach into a side yard not adjacent to a public right of
way to a minimum side yard setback of six (6) feet. Thio
exception is not intended to permit the encroachment of any
livable area into the required ton foot setback.
This language is specific to attached garages only and also
clarifies and issues about encroachment on corner Sots. please do
not hesitate to contact me to discuss these comments further.
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO._
THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, M NNESOTA, HEREBY ORDAINS
THAT TITLE 10 (COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE) OF
THE MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE BE AMENDED BY ADDING THE
PORTION IN PARANTHESIS TO SECTION C OF CHAPTER 3-3 AS IT
RELATES TO YARD REQUIREMENTS.
CHAPTER 3
GENERAL PROVISIONS
3-3: YARD REQUIREMENTS:
cc] All setback distances as listed in the table below shall be measured from
the appropriate lot line and shall be required minimum distances.
Adopted this
(*In the R-1 zoning district, attached garages may be permitted to
encroach into a side yard not adjacent to a public right of way to
aminimum side yard setback of six (6) feet. This exception is not
intended to permit the encroachment of any livable area into the
required ten (10) foot setback.)
day of
Mayor
, 1993.
City Administrator
.o,
Front Yard Side Yard
Rear Yard
A-0
60 30
60
R-1
30 •10
30
R-2
30 10
30
R-3
30 20
30
R-4
30 30
30
PZR
See chapter 10 for specific regulations.
PZM
See chapter 10 for specific regulations.
B-1
30 16
20
B-2
30 10
20
B-3
30 10
30
B-4
0 0
0
I-1
40 30
40
I-2
60 30
60
Adopted this
(*In the R-1 zoning district, attached garages may be permitted to
encroach into a side yard not adjacent to a public right of way to
aminimum side yard setback of six (6) feet. This exception is not
intended to permit the encroachment of any livable area into the
required ten (10) foot setback.)
day of
Mayor
, 1993.
City Administrator
.o,
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
EXCERPTS
Emmerich Zoning_ Ordinance
Amendment Request
Is request consistent with Goals, Policies, etc?
Por tho Cospceheaalve Plan to validly tonatioe, it gout b. basad an
an onderatanding of "o aspiutions held by tha citisena !oc their
-37-
community. The community goals are preferences as to: tlr the
general type of community that future physical development should
help producer and (2) the character and location of the major
physical elements forming the urban environment.
Before the Comprehensive Plan can be carried into effect, these
community goals must be stated clearly and general agreement on them
must be reached. Otherwise, the plan cannot be conceived of as the
community's policy concerning physical development. investigating
community attitudes and formulating a publicly acceptable statement
of broad community goals is a basic part of the planning process. A
'goal* is a desired objective to be reached.
1. To develop and emphasize Monticello as a community that can
offer the advantages of being near a metropolitan area for the
enjoyment of major cultural, sports, and business assets and yet
be completely and distinctly separate from the metropolitan area
and its suburbs.
2. To encourage steady, careful growth by maintaining reasonably
1 high standards.
3. its utilize the inherent advantages of the community in terms of
location, existing population, school system, available land,
etc., to gain the best possible advantage from these assets so
as to develop a reputation as a community combining all the
desirable elements for living in Minnesota.
4. To develop the City according to an officially adopted
Comprehansive Plan for land use, transportation, and community
facilities. While the plan should not be inflexible, neither
should it be amended indiscriminantly.
S. To develop urban land uses according to a set of uniform
standards applicable to the City. Such standards should govern
land use, public improvements, health conditions, safety
features, aesthetic coneideratione, end other elements of the
urban environment for purposes of safeguarding the public
health, safety, convenience, and general welfare.
6. To maintain a public image which associates Monticello with
excellence in planning, design, and structural quality.
7. To coordLnete local plans with those of the school district,
adjacent and nearby communities, and others, is essential to the
well-0aiaq of local residents.
8. To develop a sound and broad tax bass for the City and the
school district is essential in order to provide revenue tot
adequate public facilities and services without creating undue
burdens upon property owners.
9. To base all development decision* upon compliance with the City
Plan, appropriate planning methods and procedures, and
development standards that help to assure the best possible
results within the realm of economic and legal feasibility.
-38.
1�
10. To make major public expenditures according to a capital
improvements program and budget which establishes priority
schedules for five or six years in advance based on projections
of need and estimated revenues.
11. To encourage suitable housing in good living environments for
people of all ages, incomes, and racial and ethnic groups
throughout Monticello.
12, To allow development of new housing only where it is in harmony
with the natural environment and where adequate services and
facilities are available.
ll. To eliminate all instances of housing blight (dilapidation, poor
maintenance, etc.) as rapidly as possible.
14. To concentrate commercial enterprises into relatively compact
and well-planned areae by discouraging *spot* and 'strip'
business developmeSt.
14. To encourage the development of a strong industrial employment
base so that persons can live and work in Monticello.
16. To develop high quality industrial areas which are free from
nuisance characteristics such as noise, smoke, odors,
vibrations, glare, dust, and other objectionable features.
17. 2b purchase recreation sites for long-range needs at an early
date in order that proper sites can be obtained before urban
development or land costs sander acquisition hopeless.
16. To develop public utilities and services that are well planned
and cost-effective for present and future needs at the lowest
possible operating and maintenance costs.
19. Tb evaluate present and future traffic flow volumes in order to
develop various land use strategies to prevent congestion on the
public streets.
20. ib protect residential areas by channeling major traffic volumes
onto a relatively few major streets.
•
c
�.
4
GENERAL HOUSING POLICIES
In
Monticello, urban planning should b d iqned to promote high
standards
for residential development alp to assure the best
possible living environment.
S1.
The Planning Commission, in coordination with the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority, will be advocates for reform of land
use controls, increased housing fundinq, governmental and
.
legislative changes, and in general, act to increase public
awareness of housing problems and solutions. The Commission
will evaluate the City's regulatory codes and ordinances to
.
insure that these regulations provide maximum opportunity to
develop a range of housing types at various income levels and
permit utilization of innovative site development and
®
construction techniques.
2.
Attempts will be made to develop and implement affirmative
programs for open houaing. 00pan housing is housing that is
available to all persons without regard to race, creed, color,
sex, or ethnic background.
3.
Now housing'areas shall be provided utilities as they expand
.
toward the perimeter of the City.
a.
Residential uses should be permitted to mix with commercial or
industrial uses unless it can be demonstrated that the
residential and non-residential uses will be in conflict.
S.
Developments shall be designed to respect the natural features
of the site to the maximum extent feasible.
6.
Development' proposals will be evaluated with respect to their
.
potent'iel'effect upon adjacent and nearby developments and their
effect upon the public welfare of the City and adjacent
.
comm" it ies .
7.
Developmente.must be developed according to well conceived plans
that tend to unity and relate to each other) developments that
are'a.hodge-godge and ill-conceived will be disapproved.
8.
Within the OAA, a density of 10,000 to 12,000 square feet of lot
area per dwelling unit will be promoted in the areas of utility
.
service contiguous to the present city and in those areas where
central utility'service construction is contemplated within five
Yeats.
9.
Al"gli'antidipeted-densities in areas capable of utility
service* with in tivo years may be designed at 10,000 to 12,000
square feet of lot area per dwelling unit, building permits
.
shall not be issued for a density of more than one dwelling unit
per 2.9 acres'with on-site sewer systems based upon percolation
tests. "
_4h
1 r• `
10. The existing density req ret (land area per dwelling units)
as Outlined in the ronin o inance shall be continually
reviewed to determine their appropriateness for adoption to
changing times and conditions.
11. Appropriate urban renewal measures will be taken to assure
maintenance of the existing housing supply in good to excellent
condition. Suitable standards for structure and yard
maintenance will be developed and enforced to help assure
maintenance of residential neighborhoods in a sound condition.
12. All types of housing will be permitted including apartment
structures, townhouses, and others, provided each is properly
located according to the Comprehensive Plan, the site plans and
structural quality (materials, workmanship, and design) are in
accordance with the highest feasible standards, and each is in
conformance withvthe provisions of the toning ordinance.
13. where provisions foe sanitary sewer are act contemplated in the
near future (within five years), the density $bell not exceed
one dwelling unit per forty acres. The actual lots else per
unit, however, may be as email an 2.3 acres subject to the
provision of an approved individual on-site sewage system based
upon percolation tests.
Simla family Houainq Policies'
f
1. Some occupations will be permitted provided such activities are
conducted in a manner which assume that evidence of such
occupation is not present.
' 2. Single family housing should not be allowed individual access to
majoc thocaughfaces but will orient toward minor residential
streets.
Multiole Family Housing Policies
1. Multiple family Dwellings ace recognised as being a worthwhile
addition to the urban environment and tax base under conditions
as established in the Comprehensive Plan and by zoning,
subdivision, and *that codes and ordinances.
However, the planning Commission will look with disfavor upon
projects with design features that ace considered inappropriate,
such as architectural designs that ars incompatible with
existing and proposed developments and unimaginative site
designs.
2. Multiple Dwelling projects shall be encouraged to develop as
"Planned Units' with specitic pians submitted for structures,
architectural design, landscaping, circulation, open space,
recreation facilities, and any other features that may be
proposed.
-43-
D
do not follow the proper procedures which Oita c sults In their
decisions having been overturned by a court o! when challenged by
prospective developers. For example, in those aces when public
hearings are required, it is important not onI hold the public
hearing but to follow the proper legal cequir n for public notice
in a legal newspaper.
A common mistake in the application of the Zoning Code involves the
double standard. ibr example, different procedures may be used
depending upon whether the applicant is a long-time resident of the
community or a developer. It should be emphasised that the law does
not recognize differences between applicants and that the same
procedures must be used regardless of the background and stature of
the applicant.
The following are some questions which should be raised when
proposals for zoning amendments, variances, and conditional use
permits are brought petoce the Planning Commission.
IONING AMENEKENP
1. Bas there been a change in the development policies of the
commmity?
2. Has there been a change in the conditions in the community such
as rapid population or development change?
1. Was there a mistake made in the development of the original
zoning ordinance which needs to be corrected?
4. Is the zoning ordinance up to date?
S. Does the proposed went conform to the intent of the
Comprehensive Development Plan?
S. Is the proposed use campatible with adjacent land uses?
7. Is the proposed amendment and land use likely to lead to a
monopoly situation so as to amount to a spot soning?
B. Mhat is the affect of the proposed rezoning on such public
utilities as sanitary sewera, water, roads, schools?
9. will the proposed development place an undue financial burden on
the local community?
ZONING VABIANCS
1. Does the zoning ordinance and its standards. and regulations lead
to a practical difficulty or undue hardship on the part of the
property owner in the use of his property?
-72-
2. Is the hardship unique to the property, i.e., lot shape,
topography, bad soils, etc.?
1. Is the hardship caused by any actions on the part of the lend
owner?
4. Ie the land owner unable to acquire adjacent Land so as to meet
the dimensional standards of the ordinance?
IS. Will the proposal alter the essential character of the area?
6. Is the proposal in conformance with the spirit and intent of the
I=oning ordinenoa?
COMISIOIAL 088 PRIM ^ ` • n
1. Is the proposed use speciwFically, Listed under the special uses
Iof the raring ordinance?
2. Goes the proposed use need or conform to the development
standards listed for special use -Vomits in the ordinance?
]. Goes the proposed use conform in all respects to the
Comprehensive Development Plan?
-74-
Council Agenda - 9/13/93
s. Consideration of a request to amend Chanter 10 of the Monticello
Zoning Ordinance by adding a provision that would increase the
maximum size allowed for private garages accessory to a residential
use in a PZM (oerformance zone mixed) zone. ADolicant. Randy,
Ruff. (J.O.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Following is a copy of the agenda supplement provided to the Planning
Commission regarding this case. For the sake of efficiency, you are being
provided the same supplement.
Planning Commission recommended denial based on the finding that
development of such a large accessory building, even with conditions as
proposed, is not consistent with the purpose of the PZM district and is not
consistent with the comprehensive plan.
Planning Commission Agenda - 9/7/93
Public Hearing -Consideration of a request to amend Chanter 10 of the
Monticello Zoning Ordinance by adding a provision that would
increase the maximum size allowed for urivate garages accessory to
a residential use in a PZM (performance zone mixed) zone. ADnticant.
Randv Ruff. W.O.)
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
As you recall at the previous meeting of the Planning Commission, Planning
Commission considered granting a variance to Randy Ruff to allow
development of a 2,600 sq ft accessory structure. The exterior wall of the
structure was to be covered with steel siding. Planning Commission denied the
variance request whereupon Ruff appealed the Planning Commission decision
to the City Council. The City Council denied the variance request as well but
suggested that Ruff reintroduce the request as a zoning ordinance amendment.
Under the zoning ordinance amendment concept, an accessory structure in
excess of 1,000 sq ft could be constructed in a PZM zone as long as it meets a
relatively strict set of standards as defined by ordinance. The concept behind
establishing a zoning ordinance amendment would be to make the
requirements relatively strict so that a garage in excess of 1,000 sq ft would
only he allowed under limited circumstances where lot size allows construction
of a larger accessory garage. According to the City Planner, the conditions
allowing an accessory structure can not be written so tightly so as to allow the
structure to be located on only one site in the PZM district; therefore, there is
a possibility that accessory structures in excess of 1,000 sq ft, if allowed as a
conditional use permit for Randy Ruff in his neighborhood, could also be
developed in other areas within the PZM zoning districts. Following is a quick
review of the conditions associated with the conditional use permit as noted in
the proposed ordinance.
Accessory Building Size and Setback
The ordinance requires that accessory buildings be no larger than the principal
structure. This would seem to make sense because, by definition, a building
that is accessory to a principal structure should be smaller than the principal
structure or at least no larger than the principal structure. In addition, the
accessory building should not occupy more than 25% of the rear yard.
Another proposed ordinance setback requirement would be double the setback
requirement for the accessory structures in the R-3 zoning district. The
standard requirements for setbacks for accessory structures in the R-3 zoning
district at the side hard is 10 feet and at the rear yard is 5 feet. These
requirements would be doubled under the proposed zoning ordinance
amendment. The ordinance would not allow the structure to be located
forward of the front yard setback of the principal structure.
0
Planning Commission Agenda - 9/7/93
Desi¢n Standards
Under the proposed ordinance, building would need to have a minimum of 3:12
roof pitch and a minimum of a 6 -inch soffit. This is a standard building
requirement already enforced by the City.
Accessory building must be anchored to a permanent concrete foundation.
Accessory building shall be designed and finished on all sides of materials
consistent with principal structure. This aspect of the conditional use permit
is not consistent with the request made by Ruff. Ruff originally requested that
he be allowed to construct a steel building. The ordinance as proposed would
not allow this option. Planning Commission will need to consider whether or
not it wants to include this restriction in the conditional use permit conditions.
The proposed ordinance amendment also limits the height of the structure to
15 feet and prohibits the building from being placed within 10 feet from any
other structure on the lot. This particular requirement is consistent with
existing requirements regulating accessory structures. Limiting the height of
the structure will result in the building being a less imposing structure on the
site without reducing its function.
Activities/Use
The ordinance limits the use of the building for uses accessory to a residence.
No commercial storage, manufacturing, etc. is allowed. This aspect of the
conditional use permit is very difficult to enforce. One has to be concerned
about the future use of a large accessory structure and, that over time,
residential use would become secondary to commercial use.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Motion to approve proposed zoning ordinance amendment allowing
accessory buildings or garages with a floor area in excess of 1,000 sq ft.
Under this alternative, Planning Commission is comfortable that
allowing large accessory buildings in a PZM zone is consistent with the
intent of the PZM zone and that the conditions under which such a
building can be established are sufficient to assure that the PZM
neighborhoods will be protected. Under this alternative, Planning
Commission could make the finding that the zoning ordinance
amendment is consistent with the geography and character of the PZM
zoning district and the amendment is consistent with the comprehensive
plan.
Planning Commission Agenda - 9/7/93
Motion to deny zoning ordinance amendment to allow accessory
buildings or garages with a floor area in excess of 1,000 sq ft.
Under this alternative, the Planning Commission could make a finding
that the proposed zoning ordinance amendment is not consistent with
the geography and character of the PZM zoning district. One could
argue that, even with relatively strict conditions, it is possible that large
accessory buildings will be constructed in other PZM zoning areas
throughout the city. Rd
By allowing large accessory structures in residential zones, the door is
open for the use of the structures for uses other than residential use.
Already we have seen individuals that construct 1,000 sq ft garages
using their garages for manufacturing sites and for storage of
construction equipment or materials that are simply not accessory to a
residential use.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Although city staff is sympathetic to Ruff's request and that if the conditional
use permit is granted in his case, it would seem to be justifiable given the Ruff'
neighborhood. However, it is our view that, even that with these strict
conditions as noted, an opportunity would now exist for similar structures to
be developed in other PZM districts. We do not feel it is in the best interest
of the city to allow large accessory structures to be constructed in other PZM
zones.
SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of proposed zoning ordinance amendment; Map identifying PZM districts;
Description of purpose of PZM zone; Copy of exerpts from Comprehensive Plan.
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO._
THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA. HEREBY ORDAINS
THAT TITLE 10 (COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE) OF
TBE MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE BE AMENDED BY ADDING
SECTION N TO CHAPTER 10.8 AS IT RELATES TO THE PZM ZONING
DISTRICT, AND RENUMBERING FOLLOWING SECTIONS ACCORDINGLY.
CHAPTER 10
"PZ -RESIDENTIAL & PZ -MIXED" ZONING DISTRICTS
10-8: PZM: CONDITIONAL USES: Only the following uses are conditional uses in
a PZM district.
[N] Accessory buildings or garages with a floor area in excess of 1,000 square feet
provided that they meet the following conditions:
1. The setback requirement shall be double the setback
requirements for accessory structures in the R-3 zoning district.
2. No accessory building shall be erected or located within any
required yard other than the rear yard nor shall it be located
forward of the front yard setback of the principal structure.
3. The accessory building shall not occupy more than twenty-five
(25) percent of a rear yard, nor shall the floor area of the
accessory structure exceed the floor area of the principal
structure.
4. The accessory building shall be constructed to have a Minimum
3:12 roof pitch with minimum six (6) inch soffit.
5. The accessory building must be anchored to a permanent
concrete foundation.
6. The accessory building shall be designed and finished on all
sides with materials consistent with the principle structure.
7. The accessory building shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height
and shall be ten (10) feet or more from any other building or
structure on the same lot and shall' not be located within a
utility easement.
,4�
Ordinance Amendment No.
Page 2
The accessory building shall be used for activities or storage
accessory to a residential use. No commercial storage or
activities shall be allowed.
Adopted this day of , 1993.
Mayor
City Administrator
(D
WITH FtppK BRA GREATgR „µ
Og ACC�9spgY BUILpiNGB ' i` .
At`
I
4�.I'D
•
•
1 1 V-� 7j"
O
�.n• u. •a,., . .-- . .
FZK — AREAS ELIGIBLE FOR ACCESSORY BUILDINGS WITH FLOOR AREA GREATER THA:
1,000 SQUARE FEET.
CHAPTER 10
"PZ -RESIDENTIAL G PZ-MIYZD" ZONING DISTRICTS
SECTION:
10-1: Purpose
10-2: General Description
10-3: PZR, Permittad Uses
10-4: PZR, Permitted Accessory Uses
10-5: PZR, Conditional Uses
10-6: PZM, Permitted Uses
10-7: PZM, Permitted Accessory Uses
10-8: PEN, Conditional Uses
10-9: Procedure
10-10: Compliance
/
10-1: PURPOSE: The purpose of the "PZ," Performance Zoning,
districts is to allow for development flexibility and special
design control within sensitive areas of the city due to
*1" environmental or physical limitations. The performance zoning
districts also attempt to create a reasonable balance between 1
the interest of the property owner in freely developing his
proppeerty and at the same time protect the interest o'
auxounding properties in the following ways:
[A] By encouraging a more creative approach in commercial
and housing developments that will result in quality
living environments through innovative design and
aesthetic controls;
[B] By permitting a combination of housing types and styles,
including single family, two-family, and multiple family
dwellings, with the exception of mobile homes;
(Cl By allowing flexibility in design by permitting cluster
developments and a variety of architectural styles and
treatments;
(D] By allowing flexibility in setback and height
restrictions.
(E] By providing an efficient use of land resulting in more
cost efficient installation of utilities, streets, and
other facilities;
[F] By encouraging the preservation of common open space,
recreational facilities, natural features such as
woodland, wetland, and flood plain;
(G) By contributing to the tax base of the community without
making undue demands on the community services;
I 5•
MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 10/1
[H) By providing the means for greater flexibility i
environmental design than is provided under the strict
application of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance and
Subdivision Ordinance while at the same time preserving
general welfare of the city of Monticello and its
inhabitants.
10-2: GENERAL DESCRIPTION: It has been determined that within
certain unique areas of the community, the precise designation
of acceptable land use and the geographic definition of such
activities cannot be accomplished without detailed analysis of
land use, construction costs, and improvement feasibility and
costs, market conditions, and financing. In such cases, in
order to allow property owners the opportunity to pursue the
highest and best use of their land within the constraints of
environmental and physical limitations, the "PZ", performance
zoning, districts have been created. To further define the
intent of performance zoning, two separate districts have been
created as follows:
(A) "PZ -RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT": The purpose of the
"PZ -Residential Zoning District" is to provide a
harmonious mixture of different residential land uses in
a manner which best utilizes the development potential
of the land and natural environment, existing adjacent
and future adjacent land uses.
[H] "PZ -MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICT": The purpose of the "PZ -
Mixed Use Zoning District" is to provide a land use
transition between high density residential land uses
and low intensity business land uses, as well as the
intermixing of each such land use.
10-3: PERFORMANCE ZONE -RESIDENTIAL ("PZR")
PERMITTED USES: Only the following uses are permitted uses
within a PZR district:
(A) Those uses listed as permitted uses within the R-1
zoning district. Standards shall be as contained
therein.
[e) Those uses that exist prior to the adoption of this
chapter.
(C) A permitted use shall be regulated by the terms and
conditions of this ordinance as they pertain to an R-1
district.
10-4: PZR PERNI7TED ACCESSORY USES: Only the following uses are
permitted accessory uses within a PZR district:
(A) Those uses listed as permitted accessory uses In the R-•
zoning district.
O
ZONING ORDINANCE 10/2
• • •, a a
DI a
s � • i f• i i i `
Is request consistent with Goals, Policies, etc?
fbs the CoMp eWmiva Plan to validly f nation, it Must be basad on
an undasatandini of the aspirations bald by the oitisour for thair '
`37-
community. The community goals are preferences as for (1) the
general type of community that future physical development should
help produce; and (2) the character and location of the major
physical elements forming the urban environment.
Before the Comprehensive Plan can be carried into effect, these
community goals must be stated clearly and general agreement on them
must be reached. Otherwise, the plan cannot be conceived of as the
community's policy concerning physical development. Investigating
community attitudes and formulating a publicly acceptable statement
of broad community goals is a basic part of the planning process. A
*goal* is a desired objective to be reached.
1. To develop and emphasise Monticello as a community that can
offer the advantages of being near a metropolitan area foe the
enjoyment of major cultural, sports, and business assets and yet
be completely and distinctly separate from the metropolitan area
and its suburbs.
•
2. To encourage steady, careful growth by maintaining rreasonably
high standards.
3. 1b utilise the inherent advantages of the community in terms of
location, existing population, school system, available land,
etc., to gain the best possible advantage from these assets so
as to develop a reputation as a community combining all the
desirable elements for living in Minnesota.
•. To develop the City according to an officially adopted
Comprehensive Plan for land use, transportation, and community
facilities. While the plan should not be inflexible, neither
should it be amended indiscriminantly.
S. To develop urban land uses aS2gzdJpa to a not of uniform
standards Sgolbcable to the City. Such standards should govern
Lang -ane, public improvements, health conditions, safety
of atucee, aesthetig considera"=o, and other elements of the
urban environment for purposes of safeguarding the public
health, safety, convenience, and general welfare.
6. To maintain a public image which associates Monticello with
excellence in planning, design, and structural quality.
7. 7b coordinate local plans with those of the school district,
adjacent and nearby communities, and others, to essential to the
well-being of local residents.
S. To develop a sound and broad tax base for the City and the
school district is essential in order to provide revenue for
adequate public facilities and services without creating undue
burdens upon property owners.
9. ib base all development decisions upon compliants with the City
Plan, appropriate planning methods and pcocsduces, and
development standards that help to &sauce the beet possible
results within the realm of economic and legal feasibility.
-38-
O
10. 20 make major public expenditures according to a capital
improvements program and budget which establishes priority
schedules for five or six years in advance based on projections
of need and estiatted revenues.
U. To encourage suitable housing in good living environments for
people of all ages, incomes, and racial and ethnic groups
throughout Monticello.
12. To allow development of new housing only where it is in harmony
with the natural environment and where adequate services and
facilities are available.
13. To eliminate all instances of housing blight (dilapidation, poor
maintenance, etc.) as rapidly as possible.
ls. ib concentrate commercial enterprises into relatively compact
and well-glanned areae by discouraging 'spot' and *strip*
business developme4t.
13. Sb encourage the development of a strong industrial employment
bass so that persons can live and work in Monticello.
16. To develop high quality industrial areas which are free from
nuisance characteristics such as noise, woke, odots,
vibrations, glare, dust, and other objectionable features.
17. To purchase recreation sites for long-range needs at an early �
date in order that proper sites can be obtained before urban
development or land costs render acquisition hopeless.
10. ib develop public utilities and services that are well planned
and cost-effective for present and future needs at the lowest
possiblo operating and maintenance costs.
19. To evaluate present and future traffic flow volumes in order to
develop various land use strategies to prevent congestion on the
public streets.
20. To protect residential areas by channeling major traffic volumes
onto a relatively few major streets.
A
s .�
9
GENERAL HOUSING POLICIES
In
Monticello, urban planning should b d igned to promote high
standacds
for residential development elp to assure the beat
possible living environment.
1.
The Planning Commission, in coordination with the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority, will be advocates for reform of land
use controls, increased housing fundinq, governmental and
legislative changes, and in general, act to increase public
awareness of housing problems and solutions. The Commission
will evaluate the City's regulatory codes and ordinances to
.
insure that these regulations provide maximum opportunity to
develop a range of housing types at various income levels and
permit utilisation of innovative site development and
construction techniques.
2.
Attempts will be made to develop and implement affirmative
programs for open housing, 00pen housing is housing that is
■
available to all persons without regard to race, creed, color,
sex, or ethnic background.
2.
New housing areae shall be provided utilities as they expand
■
toward the perimeter of the City.
.
a.
Residential uses should be permitted to mix with commercial or
industrial uses unless it can be demonstrated that the
residential and non-residential uses will be in conflict.
S.
Developments shall be designed to respect the natural features
of the site to the maximum extent feasible.
6.
Development proposals will be evaluated with respect to their
■
potential effect upon adjacent and nearby developments and theic
effect upon the public welfare of the City and adjacent
■
communities.
7.
Developments must be developed according to' well. conceived plans
that tend to unify and relate to each other developments that
.
are a,hodge-podge and ill-conceived will be disapproved.
8.
within the OAA, a density of 10,000 to 12,000 square feet of lot
area per dwelling unit will be promoted in the areas of utility
.
service contiguous to the present city and in those areas where
central utility service construction is contemplated within five
years.
...,,_ ... ..
9.
Although'antioipated densities in areas capable of utility
service within five years may be designed at 10,000 to 12,000
square foot of lot area per dwelling unit, building permits
.
shall not be issued for a density of more than one dwelling unit
par 2.5 acres with on-site sewer systems based upon percolation
.
tests.
-aa-
9
10. The existing density req nt (land area per dwelling units)
ae outlined in the ronin inance shall be continually
reviewed to determine their appropriateness for adoption to
changing times and conditions.
11. Appropriate urban renewal measures will be taken to assure
maintenance of the existing housing supply in good to excellent
condition. Suitable standards for structure and yard
maintenance will be developed and enforced to help assure
maintenance of residential neighborhoods in a sound condition.
12. All types of housing will be permitted including apartment
structures, townhouses, and others, provided each is properly
located according to the Comprehensive Plan, the site plans and
structural quality (materials, workmanship, and design) are in
accordance with the highest feasible otandacds, and each is in
conformance witty, the provisions of the zoning ordinance.
13, where provisions for sanitary sewer are not contemplated in the
neat future (within five years), the density shall not exceed
one dwelling unit per forty acres. The actual lots size per
unit, however, may be as small as 2.S acres subject to the
provision of an approved individual on-site sewage system based
upon percolation tests.
Sinale Familv sousino Policies
I
1. Some occupations will be permitted provided such activities at*
conducted in a manner which assume that evidence of such
occupation is not present. -
2. Bingle tinily housing should not be allowed individual access to
major thoroughfares but will orient toward minor residential
streets.
Multiple Family !lousing PoliCies
1. Multiple family Dwellings are recognized as being a worthwhile
addition to the urban environment and tax base under conditions
as established in the Comprehensive Plan and by zoning,
subdivision, and other codes and ordinances.
Sowewer, the Planning Commission will look with disfavor upon
projects with design features that ars considered inappropriate,
such as architectural designs that are incompatible with
existing and proposed developments and unimaginative site
designs.
2. Multiple Dwelling projects shall be encouraged to develcp as
"Planned tbits• with specific plans submitted for structures,
architectural design, landscaping. circulation, open space,
racraation facilities, and any other features that may be
proposed.
5
El
do not follow the proper procedures which ofte r sults in their
decisions having been overturned by a court of when challenged by
prospective developers. Por example, in those n es when public
hearings are required, it is important not onl hold the public
hearing but to follow the proper legal requir n for public notice
in a legal newspaper.
A common mistake in the application of the Zoning Code involves the
double standard. For example, different procedures may be used
depending upon whether the applicant is a longtime resident of the
community or a developer. It should be emphasised that the law does
not recognise differences between applicants and that the same
procedures must be used regardless of the background and stature of
the applicant.
She following are some questions which should be raised when
proposals for zoning amendments, variances, and conditional use
permits are brought pefore the Planning Cormiission.
ZONING AMENCKEi7f
1. Bae there been a change in the development policies of the
community?
2. Has there been a change in the conditions in the community such
as rapid population or development change?
1. Was there a mistake made in the development of the original
zoning ordinance which needs to be corrected?
4. Is the zoning ordinance up to date?
S. Does the proposed amendment conform to the intent. of the
Comprehensive Development Plan?
6. Is the proposed use compatible with adjacent land uses?
7. Is the proposed amendment and land use likely to lead to a
monopoly situation so as to amount to a spot zoning?
B. What is the affect of the proposed rezoning on such public
utilities as sanitary sewers, water, roads, schools?
9. Mill the proposed development place an undue financial burden on
the local community?
ZONING VARIA"M
1. Does the sonL q ordinance and its standards. and regulations lead
to a practical difficulty or undue hardship an the part of the
property owner in the use of his propecty?
C
2. Is the hardship unique to the property, i.e., lot shape,
topography, bad soils, etc.?
3. Is the hardship caused by any actions on the part of the land
owner?
1 6. Is the land owner unable to acquire adjacent land so as to meet
the dimensional standards of the ordinance?
3. Will the proposal alter the essential character of the area?
6. Is the proposal in conformance with the spirit and intent of the
zoning ocdinance?
CONDITIONAL 088 PSUNIT F
1. Is the proposed use specifically listed under the special uses
of the zoning ordinance?
2. Does the proposed use need or conform to the development
standards listed for special use -permits in the ordinenee?
7. Does the proposed use conform in all cespects to the
Comprahensive Development Plan?
Council Agenda - 9/13/93
6. Consideration of a conditional use request to allow open and outdoor
storage as an accessory use in an 1.2 (heavy industrial) zone and a
variance request to allow a forty (40) foot curb cut. Aaalicant. H.
Window Comuany. (J.O.)
A. REFERENCE. AND BACKGROUND
The two conditional use permits and two curb cut variance requests are being
made in conjunction with the imminent expansion of the H -Window Company.
Under the proposed expansion, the H -Window Company will he constructing
an addition of a size approximately equal to the existing building. All aspects
of the site plan will conform with city requirements in terms of landscaping,
parking, signage, etc. Please see the site plan for more detail regarding the
layout of the facility.
CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT ALLOWING OUTSIDE STORAGE
The expansion of the facility calls for use of a very small area for outside
storage. This area will he screened from view from the public right-of-way
through the use of a screening fence. The location of the outside storage is
noted on the attached site plan. As you can see, it is a relatively small area,
and there does not appear to he any reason to deny approval of this request.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of this request.
STAI.1., AISLE, AND DRIVEWAY DESIGN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The site plan conforms to the city requirements in regard to parking, drive
areas, etc., with one exception. H -Window Company requests that curb not he
required along parking expansion areas. Granting of this conditional use
permit request lessening the standard requirements would be consistent with
what the City has done for other companies that plan for future expansion.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of this request.
VARIANCE REQUEST ALIA)WING A 40 -F -r AND A 32-rr CURD CUT (24'
STANDARD)
The site plan requires two curb cut variances. The first one calls for a 40 -ft
curb cut on the eastern -most access drive on Dundas Road. This is 16 ft wider
than the maximum allowed by ordinance. They also request a 30 -ft curb cut
tit the entrance to County Road 118, which is 6 -ft wider than the maximum
allowed. The 40 -ft curb cut will allow for more maneuvering room for semi-
Council Agenda - 9/13/93
trailer trucks entering and leaving the loading berth area located on the
southerly side of the structure. A 24 -ft wide curb cut at this location is not
wide enough to allow for maneuvering room and easy access for trucks and
vehicles moving in and out of the site at this location. Similarly, the 30 -ft curb
cut is necessary to allow large semi -trucks to safely negotiate the southwest
entrance to the drive area along 117.
According to the Planning Commission, although the variance requests appear
reasonable and make sense in terms of the site plan prepared, it also appears
that the curb variances are not completely necessary to assure functional
operation of the site. Furthermore, the need for the variance has been caused
by H -Window due to the poor placement of the original structure. According
to the ordinance, action taken by the property owner such as poor placement
of the structure is not a bona fide reason for a variance. Due to the fact that
a bona fide hardship did not appear to exist, the Planning Commission elected
to deny the variance; however, along with the denial, they voted to authorize
staff to review our curb cut requirement and prepare it zoning ordinance
amendment that would allow more flexibility in establishing curb cut widths
to drive areas used primarily by trucks. This new standard could then he
applied to the H -Window situation.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
DECISION ONE
Motion to approve the conditional use request allowing outside steorage
and allowing a stall, aisle, and driveway design conditional use permit.
Approval is contingent on compliance with requirements noted by
ordinance.
Motion is based on the finding that outside storage and parking design
are in compliance with the pertinent regulations; therefore, the request
should he approved. The conditional use permit is consistent with the
character and geography of the neighborhood, is consistent with the
comprehensive plan, and will not result in a depreciation of adjoining
property values.
Council should select this option if it agrees with the findings above.
This alternative is consistent with action taken at a previous meeting
with regard to a similar request by Standard Iron.
2. Motion to deny the conditional use permit as requested. Council should
select this alternative if it dues not agree with the findings as noted.
Council Agenda - 9/1:3/93
DECISION TWO
Motion to grant the curb cut variance requests based on the finding that
the additional width will provide improved ingress and egress for semi-
trailer trucks and, thereby, improve traffic flow and associated traffic
safety.
Under this alternative, staff will also investigate options for modifying
the zoning ordinance to provide more flexibility in establishing curb cut
widths per the Planning Commission request. This alternative will
allow the project to proceed on its tight construction schedule.
Motion to deny the variance request based on the finding that a
hardship is not demonstrated and authorize City staff to prepare a
zoning ordinance amendment which could allow the wider curb cut
without a variance.
This is the alternative selected by the Planning Commission. This
alternative would not allow the project to proceed along the construction
schedule established by Ow H -Window Company on it timely basis.
With this alternative, the City Council could take the view that a 24 -ft
wide curb cut is not sufficient for ingress and egress to the site and at
the same time at true hardship has not been demonstrated. In other
words, the ordinance needs to he updated. Thi i alternative will
postpone final approval, delay construction, and thereby threaten the
project.
Motion to deny the variance request as requested based on it finding
that it hardship has not been demonstrated.
Council should select this alternative if it believes that a hardship has
not been demonstrated and there is no need to update the ordinance:
either. This alternative could threaten the project.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
DECISION ONE
Staff recommends alternative 41.
Council Agenda - 9/13/93
DECISION TWO
Staff recommends alternative #2. It is our view that 30 -ft and 40 -ft curb cuts
at the proposed locations will improve the functionality of the site. We do not
foresee any significant problems created by granting the variances specific to
the site itself or traffic on adjoining roads. However, there is the concern that
the variance is being granted without proved demonstration of hardship and
that perhaps, if City Council wants to grant the variance, we need to look at
our curb cut width requirement and consider amending the ordinance to allow
greater flexibility. Perhaps the ordinance could be amended to include curb
cut width as an aspect to be considered in conjunction with the conditional use
permit allowing a reduction in parking lot standards. Whatever the case, it is
our view that the benefits of granting this variance in terms of keeping the
project on track and improving site flow for truck traffic offsets the negative
precedent that would be set.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of site plan.
1
i
I
i
I , I
I , i
I
I
I
I
i
I , 1
1 , i
I
I
I
c
L • I
I
I { i
i
i �rr • • •
j I
i • • f I
1 �' '�fOtas� Aitq . � • • • •• �_ I i I • • I i v
Cak�,;da � t''t't f•t�� � t � � �' c f' i'''' I
ON
• 1,11LL11LJ_I.L.L.la1LL1�L1_l.l.l I
*0004001-4,
1030
-----------------------
I—''---------— --
•�� V4/i.nLt �` t !
Council Agenda - 9/13/93
Consideration of leasing a portion of 5th Street richt-of-wav to
Sunnv Fresh Foods for development of a paved parkins area. IJ.0.1
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
In conjunction with development of an upgraded parking area on the east
side of the Sunny Fresh facility, Sunny Fresh Foods requests that the City
grant permission to include a portion of the 5th Street right-of-way in the
parking lot. The dimension of the 5th Street area to h-, used is 18' x 122',
which equals 2,196 sq ft.
In recent months, Sunny Fresh Foods has undertaken a site reorganization
and beautification effort. Up to this point, the efforts have included
refurbishing of the lab facility, demolition of a storage building in the area
of the proposed parking lot, and other site beautification projects. Since
none of the improvements constituted an expansion of the facility, the City
has not required that additional parking he created or that non-confimning
parking areas be brought up to code. The parking area proposed for
development is being completed voluntarily by Sunny Fresh and represents
an improvement to a lawful non-confio-ming use.
According W Joe Campbell, the Sunny Fresh business operation has
witnessed recent growth, and he is positive about the prospects of expansion
of the facility. It should be noted that at such time that any proposed
expansion would he proposed, then the City will need to look at the overall
site plan in terms of compliance with city ordinances and consider requiring
upgrades where necessary. Upgrades could include development of
additional parking, upgrading curl) and curb cuts, landscaping, etc.
Sunny Fresh Foods has been utilizing the kith Street right-of-way for some
time as it place for spillover parking. The request now is to formalize this
use. They have noted that the City has not objected to the use of this
property by Sunny Fresh in the past and, therefore, feel that paving the
area will not create problems.
The 5th Street right-of-way is owned by the City but is also provided W
Burlington Northern by easement for use us it railroad right-of-way. There
is some confusion over final authority as to who can approve or deny dual
use of the right-of-way. City stnff will be researching whether or not
Burlington Northern needs to grant approval of the proposed parking lot.
Council Agenda - 9/13/93
The lot itself will he 20 ft from the railroad tracks, and it does not appear
that there will be any conflicts between the track and the parking lot;
however, we think it makes sense to make sure that Burlington Northern
reviews and approves the plan prior to the City granting the lease.
CITY A7r0RNF.Y RECOMMENDATION
I have reviewed the matter with the City Attorney, and he strongly
recommends that the City lease the area rather than granting the space to
the Sunny Fresh via vacation of the 5th Street right-of-way. Upon Council
approval, he will prepare a lease agreement that features the following
terms:
1. Lease duration will be no lunger than one year for the first
year and shorter time periods thereafter.
2. Nu activity at this location would he allowed other than vehicle
parking.
3. Insurance would need to he provided by Sunny Fresh naming
the City the third party beneficiary.
4. Any improvements (curl) and gutter) Income the property of
the City.
5. A lease payment amount would he established. This amount
needs to be determined by Council.
have reviewed the potential terms with .hw Campbell of Sunny Fresh. He
agrees in concept with all of the terms above. He has not suggested it lease
amount but requests that it be nominal.
Other conditions that may need to he accomplished in conjunction with
granting the lease would he a requirement that Sunny Fresh complete
modest landscaping in the area. To the extent that this is possible is not
known given the presence of the railroad tracks. It is likely that Burlington
Northern would object to plantings in the area; however, shrubs along the
curb line may he possible. Again, the other major condition that should be
met is ohtuining approval from Burlington Northern.
Council Agenda - 9/13/93
POWCY IMPLICATIONS
As was noted earlier, expansion of the parking area may he the first phase
of an overall long-term expansion plan, which could include construction of
a major addition to the building. It should he noted to the applicant that
the area of 5th Street used for parking cannot be counted as bona fide
parking spaces when calculating the availability of parking on site. This is
because the City may need at some point in the future to withdraw from the
lease agreement. Therefore, any expansion of the Sunny Fresh facility
would require that Sunny Fresh provide all the necessary parking on site.
On the other hand, if the expansion of the Sunny Fresh facility requires
vacation of a portion of the 5th Street right-of-way, then the Pith Street
parking could be included in the overall count.
As you know, the 5th Street right -of-way utilized by Burlington Northern
extends from Washington Street on the cast to Elm Street on the west.
Property owners along this length that could possibly view this proposal as
precedent setting include Moon Motors, 6th Street Annex, Maus Foods/
Raindance Corporation. The balance of the property owners have
residential property that abuts 5th Street. In discussing the matter with
the City Planner, 1 asked him whether or not allowing parking on the 5th
Street right -of --way would create a precedent. It, was his view that some
precedent would he set, but it would he limited txecause each request for use
of 5th Street could lie reviewed on an individual Iasis. The review would
take into account unique characteristics or conditions associated with each
request.
The Planner stated that in this case, it appears reasunahle to allow the use
of the 5th Street right-of-way because the area used for parking is not
necessary for the applicant to meet the minimum requirement of the
ordinance. 'Therefore., if we take the parking away later, the City would not
create it non -conforming situation.
No too long ago, the City denied a similar but not identical request. As you
may recall, when the 6th Street Annex site plan was being developed, there
wits it request to utilize the 5th Street right-of-way for parking. This idea
was rejected by Council. What sets the lith Street Annex request apart
from the Sunny Fresh request is that kith Street was to he used fit- required
parking rather than surplus parking. Under this scencrio, if the City ever
needed the Cath Street right-of-way, it would have to eliminate required
parking, thus breaking its own ordinance.
Council Agenda - 9/13/93
As you will note on the map provided to you, Sunny Fresh has tentative
plans to construct an addition between the existing structure and the
railroad tracks. They plan on reorganizing their site so that truck
deliveries occur on the railroad track of the facility rather than occurring on
the 4th Street side of the facility. There are many issues that need to be
discussed regarding this plan which cannot be sufficiently addressed at this
time. One of the major issues worth noting, however, is the need to vacate
a portion of the 5th Street right-of-way in order for this long-term expansion
to occur. In reviewing this matter in the future, the Council will need to
determine whether or not the short-term benefit of allowing an expansion to
a growing business and associated positive reorganization of this site
outweighs the vague long-term benefit of maintaining 5th Street in
perpetuity for a roadway. Perhaps in 25 years after the nuclear power
plant is decommissioned, there will be a need for a roadway through this
location. Council will need to determine whether or not it wants to forego
long-term use of 5th Street for the sake of expansion of Sunny Fresh today.
B.ALTERNATIVE, ACTIONS:
/
C.1
) Motion to authorize City Attonmy to prepare it lease ngreement.
which would allow Sunny Fresh to use a portion of lith Street right-
of-way for parking, and authorize the City Planner to work with
v Sunny Fresh to prepare a long-term plan for the area, both at the
expense of Sunny Fresh. Motion contingent on approval by
Burlington Northern.
Under this alternative, City Council is comfortable with the proposed
terms of the lease agreement and authorizes City staff to prepare the
necessary documents. In addition, the City Planner is authorized to
get involved in helping Sunny Fresh prepare or reorganize the
operation of the site in a manner that will benefit both Sunny Fresh
and the adjacent residential areas/commercial areas.
Under this alternative, the City Council will need to establish a lease
amount. The lease unuiunt should be established on an annual busis.
If the lease duration is month to month, we will simply divide this
amount by 12.
2. Motion to deny authorization to enter into a lease agreement with
Sunny Fresh which would allow use of the lith Street right-of-way for
parking.
10
Council Agenda - 9/13/93
Under this alternative, City Council is not comfortable with private
use of the 5th Street right-of-way due to the precedent that it would
set.
Joe Campbell has indicated a strong interest in utilizing the 5th
Street right-of-way. I understand from Campbell that use of the 5th
Street right-of-way may be integral to whether or not Sunny Fresh
stays and expands in Monticello.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
City staff recommends that Council select alternative q1. It is our view that
the terms of the lease agreement provide the City with flexibility to take
back the area if necessary and allows Sunny Fresh Foods to complete site
improvements that will benefit both Sunny Fresh and the City as a whole.
It is also our view that the entire area encompassed by Sunny Fresh, the
bulk oil tanks, and even the Methodist Church, needs to be reviewed in
light of the potential expansion plans of Sunny Fresh. It is our hope that
Sunny Fresh will employ the City Planner to prepare a long-term plan for
the site similar to the plan work that was done with the hospital district.
Perhaps to encourage Sunny Fresh to complete the planning process, the
City Council may wish to contribute some of the funds necessary to
complete the plan. City contribution may lie justified in light of the fact
that the plan should include more area than just the Sunny Fresh site;
therefore, there is a general benefit to the City. As you may recall, the City
split the cost of the planning effort with the hospital district 50/50.
SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of site plan showing 5th Street parking area and potential building
expansion location.
1
METHODIST
CHURCH
SITE
I L
•'''I i C•'••i
5th Stfoot
7-7
i \
I wslfwe
I
I
I `
SITE PLAN
b
Y� err biO w�
L_
Council Agenda - 9/13/93
e. Review Communitv United Methodist Church proposal for
placement of a 12'x 52' ternDorary classroom on site. W,W
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Representatives from the Methodist Church will he in attendance to discuss
the church's desire to place a 12' x 52' temporary classr«am on the site of
the Methodist Church. Council is not asked to approve or deny the request
since an approval will require at a minimum a number of variances and
perhaps zoning ordinance amendments. I understand that it is the intent of
the Methodist Church representatives to detail the need fur additional sparge
on site and to outline potential long-term plans for the congregation
facilities.
The proposal to place a temporary structure on site is in conflict with the
city ordinance in a number of ways. First of all, the Methodist Church
facility is located in an industrial zone; therefore, any expansion of the
facility is limited due to the fact, that the church is a non -conforming use. A
non -conforming use is not generally allowed tAa expand or intensify the use.
In addition, the parking on site is inadequate for the existing use. Allowing
expansion to occur compounds this problem and is also inconsistent with the
city ordinance. As you know, when a non -conforming site expands, then all
aspects of the site need to he brought up to code, including providing
adequate parking. In the past, the City has been fairly strict with churches
in this regard. I understand that Trinity and St. Henry's both completed
expansion of parking areas in conjunction with expansion of their church
facilities. This situation may differ, however, in that the facility proposed
by the Methodist Church is strictly temporary, whereas the 'Trinity and St.
Henry's facilities were permanent.
According to the City Attorney and the City Planner, the City could adjust
its ordinance to allow temporary structures to he constructed in an 1.1 zone.
Preparation of it formal application fear zoning approvals by the Methodist
Church will depend on preliminary feedback provided by the City Council at
Monday's meeting.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Council is asked to review the site plan and overall concept and provide the
Methodist Church with informal feedback as tAa the viability of the concept.
Council Agenda - 9/13/93
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
As noted earlier, the proposal is not consistent with the city ordinance and,
according to the City Administrator, would be impossible to allow under the
variance process. However, adjustments to the ordinance could be made
that would enable this proposal to occur. The City Planner has suggested
the possibility of adding a provision to the ordinance that allows for "an
interim use of land." Under this provision, the City Council is given the
latitude to allow uses to occur other than those that are normally allowed in
the district in which the property is located. The interim use includes a
provision that limits the interim use to a certain time period and provides
for other conditions regulating the interim use. If it appears that Council is
somewhat supportive of the Methodist Church plans, then it is likely that
this approach will be used. Under this scenerio, Council would consider the
ordinance at the first regular meeting in October.
SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of site plan.
4,4
i :
da �.orwcr
r
Wk Sr 3
Council Agenda - 9/13/93
9. Consideration to authorize Buiwness Develooment Services. Inc. (BIDS,
Inc.) to prepare Part 11 of the State's Economic Recovery Fund
ADDlication and to call for a auhlic hearing. (O.K.)
A. REFEItENCF. AND BACKGROUND:
The City Council is being asked to authorize BDS, Inc., to prepare Part 11 of
the State's Economic Recovery Fund Application and to call for a public
hearing, said public hearing date being Monday, September 27, 1993.
In the initial H -Window Company financial proposal which was prepared by
Business Development Services, Inc. (BDS), the uses of funds totaled
$2,075,000 and included equipment, construction, site improvements, working
capital, capitalized interest, and financing costs. The sources of funds totaled
$2,075,000 and included equity at $400,000, bank at $1,175,000 (8`/, , 20 years,
1st REM), and State of Minnesota at $500,000 (5`h, 20 years, 2nd REM). The
initial pay-as-you-go TIF assistance was proposed as an annual $20,000
company debt service write-down over eight years. The approved pay-as-you-
go TIF assistance is an amoral $20,000 company site improvement write-down
over eight years.
On June 22, 199:3, Part I of the Community Development's Economic Recovery
Fund Application was submitted to the Department of Trade and Economic
Development (DTED) on behalf of the City of Monticello. The requested
amount of $500,000 to assist with the H -Window Company's 25,600 sq ft
manufacturing and 4,000 sq 1l office expansion resulting in the creation of (i0
new jobs and the retention of :15 jobs. Additionally, the request included a
State forgiveness of $5A00 per joh created or it total forgriveness of $300,0110
(60 jobs X $5,000).
In August, Representative Mark Olson and Senator Betty Adkins were notified
to endorse the City of Monticello's Community Development application to
assist the H -Window Company.
On September 2,199:1, the City of Monticello was notified by DTED to proceed
with fart. II of the application process. The letter stated that DTED will
consider an amount of $400,000 contingentupon the successful Completion of
the listed requirements. However, I)TED also stated they were not in the
position to consent to debt forgiveness in exchange for the creation of johs. The
State suggested this matter he negotiated between the City and the H -Window
Company.
14
Council Agenda - 9/13/93
Mr. Steve Lemme of the H -Window Company and Mr. Lenny Kirscht of BDS.
Inc., foresee no problems in satifying the listed requirements. A completed
Part II application must be received by DTED before an award letter can be
rendered.
If an award letter is rendered to the City of Monticello, the City would loan the
State dollars to the H -Window Company. At this time, the terms and
conditions of the $400,000 loan have not been finalized between the City and
the H -Window.
The $100,000 gap difference between the initial $500,000 request and the
$400,000 being considered by DTED will be secured through an application for
funding with the Central Minnesota Initiative Fund. Therefore, the City
Council is now being requested to authorize BDS, Inc., to begin preparation of
Part 11 of the application and to call for a public hearing. BDS's fee for
preparing Part 11 of the application is an amount not -to -exceed $3,500.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. A motion authorizing BDS, Inc., to prepare Part II of the State's
Economic Recovery Fund Application and calling for a public hearing
relating to the funding on September 27, 199:1.
2. A motion denying authorization for BDS, Inc., to prepare Part 11 of the
State's Economic Recovery Hund Application.
3. Table any action.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council authorize BDS, Inc., to prepare Part II of
the application in order for the application process to proceed on a timely
manner. Negotiations on the terms and annditions of the loan will be finalized
between City staff and the company and presented to the Council at the public
hearing on September 27.
1). SUPPORTING DATA:
None.
15
Council Agenda - 9/13/93
lo. Consideration of a resolution supporting_ Wright County's
proclamation of Waste Reduction Week. September 27 to October 2.
1993. W.S.1
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
At the request of the Wright County Solid Waste Task Force, the Wright
County Board of Commissioners, on September 7, 1993, proclaimed the
week of September 27 through October 2, 1993, as Waste Reduction Week
in Wright County. Various activities are being planned county wide to give
citizens a renewed awareness of the importance of waste reduction and
recycling. Due to the success of the City of Monticello's one -day collection of
fluorescent light bulbs from commercial and residential properties during
our Junk Amnesty Day this year, the County has helped sponsor collection
of fluorescent light bulbs county wide on Friday, October 1. One of the
communities selected for collection is Monticello. The collection is proposed
to be at the Monticello Public Works building from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. and will
he at no cost to the City unless we wish to do some additional promotion
beyond that of the County.
1 think it is time that we support this activity and try additional incentives
to give our recycling program another shot in the arm. During the month of
August, our waste going to the Wright County compost reached a high of
160.3 tons. This is the highest figure we have had since we started our
recycling program in 1989. In addition, the ttmage from recycling hits
dropped; consequently, the amount of materials recycled in August
amounted to only 17.61/(. of our waste stream when yard waste products are
excluded.
Enclosed you will find it copy of the list of activities planned in Wright
County and the County proclamation. Also enclosed is a copy of it
resolution proposed for passage tit Monday evenings meeting.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
The first alternative would he to puss it resolution supporting Wright
County's Waste Reduction Week activities and asking our residents to
give u new look to waste reduction and recycling activities.
2. The second ulternative would be to pass the resolution as outlined in
alternative tit but to also have the Monticello Recycling Committee
come up with some additional activities for city residents and sonic
additional incentives during that week period.
16
Council Agenda - 9/13/93
3. The third alternative would be to do nothing.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that we support
Wright County's activities and, should the Council desire, have some
activities of our own to spur on renewed interest in waste reduction and
recycling as outlined in alternative 112.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of Wright County Waste Reduction Week activities; Wright County
proclamation; City of Monticello resolution.
17
JNTY Ojt� Office of
PLANNING AND ZONING
I Z ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
M
WRIGHT COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
id 10 N. W. Second Street, Buffalo, MN 55313-1193
2 (612) 662.7338
7 7866
DATE: September 9. 1993
TO: Wright County Cities & Townships
FROM: Valerie Donahue, Recyc. Coord./j�
RE: WASTE REDUCTION WEER, Sept. 27 - Oct. 2
On September 7, 1993 the Wright County Board of
Commissioners proclaimed September 27 through October 2. 1993
to be Waste Reduction Week in Wright County, see proclamation
enclosed. This is a great opportunity to renew interest in
existing recycling programs and educate citizens about the
fiscal and environmental values of waste reduction.
Enclosed also is a list of some of the countywide
activities being planned. I would encourage cities to
consider making a similar proclamation and choose one or two
activities to implement locally.
I especially want to bring to your attention the
flourescent bulb collections in six cities on October let.
Please help us by encouraging all businesses and residents to
utilize this opportunity to conveniently and safely handle
their flourescent and HID bulbs (.laws now prohibit businesses
from placing these bulbs in the trash). Please copy and poet
the enclosed flyer where you think it is most visible in your
city. A fee of 8.75 for 4 foot and $1.00 for 8 foot bulbs is
being charged. The following is a list of times and places
for the bulb collections.
Annandale 8-11 am at the City Hall Lot (Randy's San.)
Buffalo 8-11 am at the Wal-Mart Lot (Aagard West)
Delano 12-3 pm at the City Hall Lot (Randy's San.)
Howard Lk 12-3 pm at County Fairgrounds (Mumford San)
Monticello 8am-3am at Public Works Lot (D & R Recyo.)
St. Michael 12-3 pm at Jack & Jill Lot (Aagard West)
Please contact me at 882-7338 or 972-2155 for further
information on the resources available or for assistance with
waste reduction activities.
Encl.
Pnnted aw mrycl d papa.
Equal Opportunity / Mfirman" Action Employer /O
SEP- 8-93 WED 9:25 WR I GHT COUNTY FAX NO. 8126826118 P. 02
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS: Wright County to concerned about pollution
prevention and remains a leader is the assa of
waste management in Greater Minnesota: and
VHERBAS: The Minnesota Waste Management Act calls for
increased reduction of our waste and pollution
at its source: and
WHEREAS: A 1992 amendment to the Minnesota Waets Management
Act sets a goal for Minnesotans to reduce the
amount of packaging that goes into the garbage by
at least 25 percent per capita by December 31,
1995; and
WHHRSASi State and county activities will :evolve around
the State of Kinnesota's environmental hierarchy
of reduce, reams, and recycle:
NOV THEREFORE, the Wright County Board of Commissioners.-
hereby proolsiza the week of September 27 -October 2. 1963 to
be
MASTS BSDUCTICB WMM
in Mright County.
„•r
SEP- 8-93 HED 9:26 WRIGHT COUNTY FAX N0. 6126826178 P.03
WASTE REDUCTION WEEE ACTIVITIES
aQjjDAY. SRP_T.27 _ RRMjrR = Pack a no waste lunch. Buy
milk in returnable bottles. Waste redaction workshops for
business scheduled, call for reservations.
Tu84oAY_ UE 21 _ = RVf!YGLRn UZ Look for recycled
products at local retailers. BYOB - bring your own bail
Free "Bay Recycled' Products Show at Hyatt RogeRey, 1300
8icollet Mall, Minneapolis
WROMRQ_nAY_ g$PT„ Z$ _ MNSRRVATIOW UX B -BOP (Sue, bike or
oar pool) today. "What A Waste" environmental education
curriculum available to Wright County educators. Yard waste
and worn composting demonstration by Mn. Extension Service.
Call 882-7384 for reservations.
THUAQAY_ swat aa a RAM Q1 Borrow rather than buy.
"Mn's Consumer Handbook to Reducing Waste" available at all
Wright County libraries. Free magazine exchanges (up to six
months old) at Annandale, Delano, Monticello and Rockford
libraries.
FRTnAY" QCT_ 1. - POLLUTTON PRRVEMTTON ply Blonrescent Bulb
Collections for all Wright County residents and bu1sineesea'in
Annandale, Buffalo, Delano, Howard Lk, Monticello A St.
Michael. Watoh newspapers for details.
QATnRnAY_ a= Z COMMLiM7TY AffTAN pAy loss the NSII
Compost Facility at Cty. Rds. 12 A 37 north of Buffalo from
1-2 ps. Bring bags of leaves or grass clippings free of
charge today. Call 1-800-382-3687, ext. 7338 for scheduling.
6p.
RESOLUTION 93-
RESOLUTION
3
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PROCLAMATION
OF WASTE REDUCTION WEEK
WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is concerned about pollution prevention; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Waste Management Act calls for increased reduction of
our waste and pollution at its source; and
WHEREAS, a 1992 amendment to the Minnesota Waste Management Act sets a
goal for Minnesotans to reduce the amount of packaging that goes into the
garbage by at least 25% per capita by December 31, 1995; and
WHEREAS, state, county, and city activities will revolve around the State of
Minnesota's environmental hierarchy of reduce, reuse, and recycle;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MONTICELLO hereby supports Lite County's pr4whimation declaring the week of
September 27 - Oc(a)ber 2, 1993, as WASTE REDUCTION WEEK in Wright
County.
Adopted this 13th day of Septemher, 1993.
Mayor
City Administrator
Council Agenda - 9/13/93
i t . Consideration of a resolution calling for a public hearing for the
installation of a gond outlet from Meadow Oaks to the Mississinni
River. W.S.I
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
City staff and Council have reviewed the need for the Meadow Oak pond
outlet for quite some time. City staff requests that the Council consider
holding a public hearing for the proposed project, and at. the conclusion of
the public hearing determine the route that the outlet will take and then
order plans and specifications for the project so that the project can be bid
in early 1994. It is suggested that the public hearing be set for the 25th of
October. This would give adequate time for City staff to discuss the project
ahead of time with some of the key players in determining the route to he
taken. Those key players would he the Monticello Township in regard to
the alignment down Gillard, Rod Norell for the possibility of access through
his properly, and Gene Bauer for the necessary easements and benefit to
his property to cross between 1-94 and Gillard.
OSM has worked up various assessment scenarios based upon the two
alternative routes selected by the City Council. The latest copies of those
are included under separate cover with your agenda package. This should
give the Council sonic insight as to whether or not we should be considering
100'',4 assessment for the Meadow Oak pond outlet or whether the City
should consider some sort of subsidy toward that project.
13. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to review the infiormation as presented
and set it public hearing for the pmpused project. for October 25 at
7 p.m. It would also assist the City staff if the Council would give
consensus as to whether or not the project would he 100'& or less
assessed.
2. The second alternative would he not to set the public hearing until
after we have had negotiations with Rod Norell, the Township, and
Gene Ilauer. But in effect, alternative ill docs actually do this, its
there is plenty of time for us Uo carry on these talks before that public
hearing.
3. The third alternative would be to do nothing at this time. This does
not appear to he in the City's best interest, as we have talked all
along about having this project completed or at least ready to he
is
Council Agenda - 9/13193
completed. Should the Council determine that the bids were too high
next year or something didn't come into place, we would at least still
have the project ready to go for bids at any time.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the City Council
consider alternative N1 and set a public hearing for October 25 on the
proposed project.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Resolution for adoption; Additional information under separate cover with
this agenda packet.
� ISI Iii f `r.
f Y411 LI it •
ASSESSED AREA
)rown By: Drowinq Title Comm. No.
R.G.D. (Bit &%.Ion MEADOW OAK TRUNK 1748.93
sroron • STORM SEWER EXTENSION
Auoelotoo.lne. Fi ure
SEPTA, two" �� ��•� •, ALTERNATE "B" (ALL)
on "1993 pM»w-uwu•ua•wlr+'" MONTICELL.O, MINNESOTA A
r l%1.Y4M
�PARCEI O
NUMBER ABBRFVIAIFD Lff'.Al fNSCRiPTTON
I.. I. I. BLOCK 3. MEADOW OAK ESTATE
11550440030'A1 LOI 2 BLOCK 3. MEADOW OAK ESTATE
1156044-00.1090 LOI 3 OIOCK 3 MEADOW OAK FSIATE
-550
:.044IE01 A BLOCK 5 MEADOW OAK ESTATE
S5044-00.1050 11016, BLOCK S MEADOW OAK ESTATE
ISSO"001050 •'-OI5 BLOCK 3. MEADOW OAK ESTATE
1550"009070 407 7. BI OC K 3. MEADOW OAK ElIATE
155044003I1B0 1018 BLOCK 5 MEADOW OAK ESIATF.
1550" (AVM 1019, BLOCK 5 MEADOW OAK ESTATE
I1550"0011(O LOT 10 BLOCK 3 MEADOW OAK [STATE
155044-003110 101 11, BLOCK 3 MEADOW OAK [STATE
1560"003120 LOT 17. (MOCK 3 MEADOW OAK ESTATE
1660",IM 130 101 11, 61.113, MEADOW OAK ESTATE
11550"003140 10114, BLOCK 3. MEADOW OAK ESTATE
%1EADOW OAK TRUNK STORM SEWER EXTENSIOM
ALTERNATE -6 (00)
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT NO.
CITY OF MONTICELLO. MINNESOTA
OSM PROJECT NO. 1748.93
SECTION. TOWNSHIP 8,
7ANOF
S1/2. SIB 1121 N. R24W
S 1/2, SIB WIN. R24W
SI/2 $IB 1121N. R24W
51/2 518, 1121N. R24W
S 1/7. 918.1121N. R24W
41/z 518, T121N, R24W
9 1/2 518 1121 N. R24W
9 1/7. 518. 1121N, R24W
91/2. E181121N R24W
3 1/2 818. 1171N R24W
3 1/2. 518 1121K R74W
l�,y_181121N. R24W
31/2. 8181121 N. R74W
81/2. 818. 1121N. R24W
I65[Ya(IM10 LOT 1. (MOCK 4 MFADOW OAK FSIATF
9 1/2 518.1171N. P74W
155,0"4UM LOT 2 BLOCK 4, MEADOW "ESTATE
3112.11&11 IKR24W
155044-0DG030 1013. (MOCK 4, MEADOW OAK FSIATE
S 1/z 8181121N R74W
1550"004050 LOIS (MOCK 4. MEADOW OAK ESTATE
S I/z B1811aIN. R24W
1550"004060 1018 BLOCK 4. MEADOW OAA TSIATE
11/1 $1& 1121N R24W
1650"4MWT0 1101 ?.BLOCK 4 MEADOW OAK fS1ATF. S I/2. BI81171N, 02AW
ADDRESS OWNFR
S.Ato Imo, 30.1011.1 -
Long. Pl trl MN 55u I Ulna Ila f.
SAME SAME
SAME SAME
SAME
SAME
SAME
SAME
2566 M0000w OcM Avg.
',11-SSED
.1cob. MN 55162
Waim F. B Baoa bJ. Word
2617 M -d- O k Law.
lAcmfl
M-Ilmll , MN 55362
WCkw D, a BonrAo K. Webbmd
2615 Mooww Oak Lana
03,31
Mmbco6o. MN 55362
Ih9 H. B EbabotN A. Ad, -
2585 WNto Oak Ckcw.
0.25:•
MmmoSo, MN 65362
Robon W. B Bowdv J. woo l
2580 WNto Oak Ckcb.
0.243
Mmmob, MN 55362
St- J. a sono. 5bo m
2607 Muoo7w Oak Laos.
51.269.541 337020
Mmtt. WIN N 65162
Burn A 8 Jealoan M. Swrwp
26%Mwxk- Oak Lora.
03M
Mmttab, MN 65362
Mna
ta J a L Vol Ak n Vd
P,O, Bok 1068 2R
1.2
Moodow Oak low
31.26964' 5425 04
Monwa o. MN wM2
KONI R. B Las K. T -V
2601 Moodow OOIL
0.455
MmH-b. MN 65362
W01 -J B May Lau I'M
SKr. IOD 3010110 t -
Low. Ryma/Rk MN 56"
I U111a Honor► vc.
9onw 3oms
Same 9atro
9r1/ro emr
loot 8vro
9mr Ys11s
Preliminary
SSED
AREA
',11-SSED
A
ASSESSMENT �=ALENT PER ASSJ:SSMENT
lAcmfl
'ONWC
RATIOS
AAIE
(AREA (A AMOUNT
03,31
R-PI10
1.2
0.307 $1.269.54 S50426
0.25:•
R-Pl1D
1,2
0.306 51.209.54 $398481
I
0.243
RPUD
1.2
0.292
51.269.541 337020
0.272
RiW
1,2
03M
31,269.541 5414,38
0 779
Q-Fw
1.2
0.335
31.26964' 5425 04
0 379
R Pl1D
I.2
0.455
71.?00.14 $577 39
0265
Q4k)D
1.2
0,319151.26954
"M 71
(1.354
RJW
1,2
0,4251
51.269.54 $539301
!1493
R PW
1.7
0,5601
11,269 54 5735 83
o4sa
RruD
I,a
o.wa
21,262.14 26266.
0360
R-PLIO
1.2
041:
11,269.54 8.5bu
0314
RSVD
1.7
0377 X11176954 _I4/9314~1
0 297
Q - PW
1.2
0.356 11,26014 $45246
0 293
R•PIID
1.2
0.35711 11.26914 Sob 37
0344�
a4W
1.2
0,41@. /1,269,54 553016
0273
RPUD
1,
0,293
R,PIID
12
0557
0421
RJW
1,2
0.505111,26914 1141,31
0480
04W
1.7
0576111,26954 031.261
0461
PIRO
1.2
0541111.260N 1687051
nAPCEI 0.
!0. wR ABBREVIATED IrGAI DFSCPIPIKON
155010040b0 LOTS BE OCK A. MEADOW OAK ESTATE
155014{04040 LOT 4 BLOCK 4. MEADOW OAK ESTATE
15501000090 LOT 9. BLOCK 4 MEADOW OAK ESTATE
ISSOY 004100 LOT IO BLOCK 4, MEADOW OAK ESTATE
15.01004110 LOT I I. BLOCK 4 MEADOW OAK f STATE
IM04 OD4170 LOT 12, BLOCK 4. MEADOW OAK FSIATE
15.01 C04130 t01 134BI OCK 4. A4Af70W OAK I S1ATF
WEADOW OAK TRUNK STORM SEWER EXTENSION'
ALTERNATE 'B' (aB)
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT NO,
CITY OF MONTICELLO. MINNESOTA
OSM PROJECT NO. 1748.93
U60UQM140 10714, I1OCK l MIADOWOA_KISIAIE 51/7. SIS II71N R24W Sk ncY ,MN 55702 l9rVrw _M_Borem 0411 APIA 17 0193 11.26954 _507014
101 1, BLOCK 1. MEADOW OAK ?W 2041 Roo 0'1 lon.
155045001010 AHDIK)N ! 112. 518, 1121 N, R24W Mnvlcab, MN 5.702 RlGloo J 6 BoOoa A BL4cn 0Y3 A PAID 1 7 0 537 31!26954 5071 89
LOT 1. BLOCK 2.MEADOW OAK 2n0
151dYO07010 A30t1ON _
1012. BLOCK 2. MEADOW OAK Ina
I55041007L77D ADDOKJN
LOT 3. BLOCK 2. MEADOW OAK 2M
1..045C07(S7I7 ADDAKIN
LOT 4 MOCK 1. MEADOW OAK 21V
15.0451IO
`
0 ADDAN
101 5 MOCK 2, MEADOW OAK 2n1
176
815110:050 ADOIIAON
LOT 6 BLOCK 2. MEADOW OAK 2nd
15.04.007060 ADDRION
- -101 7 MOCK ). MI ADOW OAK WXJ
15.01.007070 ADOBION
701 B. BLOCK 2. MFADOWOAK 2nd
15SCYSO070S0 ADD "
LOT 9, MOCK 2. MEADOW OAK 7nu
13604.OD2000 Ai)0110N
701 10 MOCK 2. MEADOW OAK 7n0
155_04.002100 ADOBK)N
701 I I, MOCK 7. MEADOW OAK Ino
165lu5002110 ADO/IION
2861 AW Oa CY W
.ASSESSED
APPA
A55ESSED
SECIKON. TOWNSHIP A
AMnlr.Ao, MN MM2
MY:nuK G 8 A4[n L Nota
AREA
A PLA
ASSESSMENT
FOUNAJEM RAR PEA
ASSSSMLNT
RANGE
ADWSS
OWMTR
/OMNG
RATIOS
APF A AEA
AM01JN1
51/2. SIB. 1121N, A24W
Sm0
Sme
0576
APL/D
17
0611 51,20954
182114
2610 M.o OAh Eon,
1
51/7. SIB 1121N R24W
MOnticob. MN 55767
&_amoy( 8C)nttuoA Fyb
0705
0POD
17
0760 $1,269.54
1 S16445�
2600 MOAaor C9 lora.
i
5 I/2 Sig TOM. R24W
MSnMab_MN SS.b2
P.T-1 J B Anka K Gramm
0 717'
A RID
1 2
0 B1 SL209_54
11,054 70 1
151 A.Can CYcW
'SI/7. Sib, 1121N R24W
MO -- MN 55307
GaYD 5OAr9E Aro+no+
077_
ARID
1,7
045CI 11,200.54
$57129
702 A- CVc
1
SI/2. 518 712 1 N, Aa4W
MONICeb, M7155307
chol"IT Wt m
0012
ARID
1.7
0500' 11,709.54
551.023161
1lq Acmes Cl"
1
S1/7. 915 1121N, R24W
N
1A4nticob, M 55302
A h.W P. S Pat -J Bucy
05991
ARID
17
101911,70954_
$1.300581
'119 4:Srn CYcb
51/7. 518 T171N 924W
IAN "2
rir-mLc SG -L C -v-
061b
ARA
17
0811, 51,209.111-$1,0_32w
910 MaooD Ora Dr y,
26W Moaavr OXY La».
51/2,5181111NR74W
U60UQM140 10714, I1OCK l MIADOWOA_KISIAIE 51/7. SIS II71N R24W Sk ncY ,MN 55702 l9rVrw _M_Borem 0411 APIA 17 0193 11.26954 _507014
101 1, BLOCK 1. MEADOW OAK ?W 2041 Roo 0'1 lon.
155045001010 AHDIK)N ! 112. 518, 1121 N, R24W Mnvlcab, MN 5.702 RlGloo J 6 BoOoa A BL4cn 0Y3 A PAID 1 7 0 537 31!26954 5071 89
LOT 1. BLOCK 2.MEADOW OAK 2n0
151dYO07010 A30t1ON _
1012. BLOCK 2. MEADOW OAK Ina
I55041007L77D ADDOKJN
LOT 3. BLOCK 2. MEADOW OAK 2M
1..045C07(S7I7 ADDAKIN
LOT 4 MOCK 1. MEADOW OAK 21V
15.0451IO
`
0 ADDAN
101 5 MOCK 2, MEADOW OAK 2n1
176
815110:050 ADOIIAON
LOT 6 BLOCK 2. MEADOW OAK 2nd
15.04.007060 ADDRION
- -101 7 MOCK ). MI ADOW OAK WXJ
15.01.007070 ADOBION
701 B. BLOCK 2. MFADOWOAK 2nd
15SCYSO070S0 ADD "
LOT 9, MOCK 2. MEADOW OAK 7nu
13604.OD2000 Ai)0110N
701 10 MOCK 2. MEADOW OAK 7n0
155_04.002100 ADOBK)N
701 I I, MOCK 7. MEADOW OAK Ino
165lu5002110 ADO/IION
Popo 2
2861 AW Oa CY W
! 1/7. SIB. 1121N. 924W
AMnlr.Ao, MN MM2
MY:nuK G 8 A4[n L Nota
0 701
A PLA
1 7
0 368 71.7.0911
1407 70
PO B0. I190 M-IM.00
3117. 318, 1121N. R24W
AIN 65.167
DS1"H fly
0745
APUD
12
0294_!1.70954
571325
mD A90 Oct CYcb
S 1/2. SIS 1121N 924W
MnnHrob, AIN 55.b7
KorHom NA Kom
_
0709
APUD
17
0373 _51.769!A _SAM
- _
AI
Roo
'17800 Oo CY W.
i
51/7. 3151 171N. 024W
W2Mo_b _MN 55307
ROW PdkW
0750
APUD
17
0311 7176954
130457
2550 Moa OIn CYcb.
SI/7.318. 1171N 1274W
AItnTICub_MN 55362
AorK1oM 11"
-
0240
APLA
12
_02%_5 1_26954 _
$379341
910 MaOr* Dr".
Onaw
S 1/2, 515. 112IN 924W
I.knllCub. MN 55302
mco W B 1 -AA lary
0375
R -PUD
1 2
0,300 71,709__54
_!496 17,
920 Moaaor OH1 DrNo.
1
! 1/2. Sig 112I_N 024W
AYnlA:ob. MN 65307
Swat M l (e" AYnKllm
- -
0305
-
APUD
- -
1 )
0 370 ITI,7HW 54 1
-
5469 77
Sd1 101 3030 NArt-
S I/2. 515 I I21N 1224W
-_
�t- 1>71+noum AW 5.001 UYo HOrtna he
0 271
RRA
1.2
0 ,337 11.769 54
14 n 00
910 MaooD Ora Dr y,
51/2,5181111NR74W
AltnMeb. MN 55337
PC -:1M McCoy
_
0 2.•0
�_
APIA
17_
ONO 11,70964
13501
_
O-
950 Me k -Ca DO-
I!
71/7:f ISI 171 N R24W
-IOD
A4[nllcupl. MN 61.107
Scor P. a Bbrp0r11 f4Atmo1
_0735_0P
-
UD
_
- 1,7
0752 !1.200 S0{]5801
_. -_
_
M-10. Oak no..
! I/7. Sib, I121N R74W
iA.W to MN 66307--fh.YrodA
l"
02"
RPUD__17
0301 _11_)60 !d ,_.__{38.043
Popo 2
Popo 3
991EADOW OAK TRUNK STORM SEWER EXTENSION'
ALTERNATE 'B'
(al)
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT NO.
CITY OF MONTICELLO,
MINNESOTA
OSM PROJECT NO. 1748.93
ASSESSED
AREA
ASSESSED
PARCEL K)
I
SEC 10N. TOWWS W
AREA
ASSESSMENT LCIUNAEEM 7AI[ PER
ASSEWANI
Yu .•PER
A6Wd VIA11DlEGAl D11ITN ION
oANM
ADDWSS
OWNFR
(A -1
IOMNG
PAT"
AMA AEA
AMOUNT
l OI I, BLACK 3 ME ALKYW OAK ?W
76C Rua Oor Logo.
1550454DOW10 ADDIIION
51/7. S18, 1121N R74W
Mnnikob MN 5'W
M hoWA SChmlalO P!9CC01
0740
RPOD
12
0307 $1.76954
sm Do
1011 FROCK 3 MI ADOW OAK 2ne
906 M9 Oak Ddv
ISS015003070 ADDTQN
S 1/2. $18. 1 17I R74W
M ,W- MN 55]67
fl -m I C-chll
0734
P?OD
1 7
0167 11.26954
-
_535801
-1
LOT 3 BLOCK J MEADOW OAK Ina
DNo,M-Wi MN
15SOA5-0D1030 ADDITION
S I /7_516 I171N R74W_ _55307
ACC d W_NkW t A e L A JAN
0251
R PUD
_I 7
0 305 11,269 54
L18600
LOT 4 BLOCK 3 MEADOW OAK 7cle
975 Meadow Oat } .
155015-00.1010 ADDIIKDN
4 1 /7. 510. 112 It R74W _
Monl_uW MN 55M2
Pa W e A- P ld rWy
0 756
O PUO
1 7
----o 30 IL? SI
_ OW U0,
_ -
LOT I BLOCK A MEADOW OAK 2W
10.E Moolgw Oar Dr K
155041004010 ADDITION
5 1 /T. 510. 1121N P24W
W�nikub, lAN 55307
�n L D -r
0797
P PL1D
1 2
0 3SG 11,769 54
-- -
3444 e5
- --
LOT 8 BLOCK 4 MEADOW OAK Ind
701 0- Lara
27010-1-
151015004060 AppIK7N
S 1/1.510. 112IN R74W
S
MCnikob MN 55302
Tk-"S OJorWT.J&jun
0702
RPLM
1 7
0247 51,16954
- _
5.101 )e
- ._
LOT 9, BLOCK A MEADOW OAK Ina
7741 Oa w Land,
15504SOoA ADDOIDN
41/7, SIS. 717IN 074W
Monikub. MN 55302
KIDA1 r>
0704
R{'UD
17_
--
0,745 {1,16954
-- -
_$310/B1
- -
LOT ID BLOCK A MEADOW OAK 2nd
7771 OaK taro
15504SOOIIm Af1D110N
SI/7. SI6. 1121N_P24W
W.Wk .MN 55367
Jones E.a A. M PO
0193
RIW
11_
0137 $1_76954
-
519403
- - LOT 7, MOCK 6 MEADOW OAK ?rid
7147 Ook- Lara.
15501500e0r0 ADITIKDN
51/7.516. 1171NPNW
Mtnnco4o, MN 55362
NWB KraN
0166
RPOD
17
0223 j1.761754
5'16336_
LOQ a ER OCA 0 MLADOW OAK 1rKf
1727 Oc t-
11604SO1.M0 A_DDn KJN
31/7. $te. 117154. R24W
"MW MN 55367
Dm"A eJONK Srt%
-
0165,
PPOD
-
17
O??0 $1.76941
$76641_
LOI 1, BLOCK L MEADOW OAK Yd
%691 Roe Our Laro.
1510•Ir001010 ,ADDIIION
$I/1.SIe. 1121N,P74W
M6nW1 W_,MN L2
4C F aSt- M 80bw
-
0499
_RPUD
17
0599 51,76051
_$/6020
LOT 2 BLOCK 1. MEADOW OAK 354
7701 Roe Oar Lara.
15505r LIOAI ADD111 IN
S 1/7 SIS 1171N 074W
- _ _-,2771
W-kw4n MN 6.'0667
WMK F Q"Gf
0311
RPD_
- --L/
_ _ 1 2
0373 $1.26954
-
5413 70
-
LOT 3. BLOCK I. MEADOW OM 3a
Purl Oar L-aro.
15505rO01030 ADMION
S 1/7.510.,12154 R74W
AWNkn4o MN 55367
OvM�A_Shu}Yxlyd
_0770
R�PL70
_1.7_
-
_0331 {1,70954
- --
3420 A/
LOI I BI OCK 1, ME ADOW OAK YO
Sao IED nlD 1kKt"
1550510010C1 ,ADDnK3N
_ S I /I SIS. 1171N R74W
L- 6L MN 5551
UDa lknwa Kl4
O 787
R PUD
17
0 336 f 1.?69 41
{429 01
101 6, BI OCK 7. MEADOW ON( 31a
155057 T?H ADOPgN
31/7.510.1171 N R74W
SJrno
Smo
2
-12__
0396 {1.76054
-
- 5:O579I
LOT Y. BLOCK 2. MEADOW OAK W
155%1002010 ADMK]N
51/7, 516, II?IN A7Aw
3-
Ytno
_0703
OPEN_
17
0316 11.20054
IIArk)67
LOT 6 Bl OCK 7. MEADOW DAN JN
15&M70020M0IADDIKDN
51_i.ue_II21N.R24W
3mw
Sora
-
07A7
-
RPSID
12
011e 11,76054
- - -
_SACK) 07
-
- - vLOT 5 BLOCK 1. MEADOW OAK Le
7761 Ped Oct Lara
15505/(K)IO'O AO(KTION
31/7.11M. 1121N, R24W
Wntkob._MN 55367
DombCKaC11�6anf6
0266
RPUD
1.2
0377 {1.76054
_$40076
u LOI O BLOCK L MEADOW OAK W
7711 Coe L71t fano.
I5505)OOIOeO IkOD1IIpN _ _
5 5/7. s1e. I171N R74w
-_
WnN:ub MN M�3071M1R
OLDrroJ G4m
o?e7 ,_
RP110_
_ 17
03]6 I1, 76954
_ IA7961
LOT 1, BLOCK L MEADOW OAK 3M
17001 Pod Oar ICIM,
IShW1m10r0 ADDPION _
S 1/1.110_I171N R14W
WnnCob_MN 5536?
,C7KsloN 0CAI01M (w
0350
RPIN
I2
_"?o 11,16954
35]371
Popo 3
'MEADOW OAK TRUNK STORM SEWER E)CTENSION'
ALTERNATE '0' (OlD
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT NO,
CITY OF MONTICELLO. MINNESOTA
OSM PROJECT NO. 1749.93
Popo 4
PAACELO
IAPPRfV1ARDIfGAE
TOW N51196
I
I
�D
ASSESSMENT
f.OUNMFNIY7^
PER
I
1NMPfR
aS('R11'iK]N
ANfO3N,
ADDWSS
*R
�'I(,,,��
�E.lN1�
701 I. BLOCK 7. MEADOW OAK Jra
71W A. `Oak Low
Iarrmr W S:hKI+6 M G.
ISS -05/071010 ADDITION
IS 112. SIE 1121N 974W
MoniK:olb. MN SSJ07
AYW>ne
I 016E
RR1D
17
O:IAOI
S1,70954
S43675,
LOT 2 BLOCK 7 MEADOW OAK aro
7410 Po `Oak Law,
15.''01767.70 ADDITION
IS 112. SIE II71N%4W
Mo111CnEn, MN 55307
I Dao R 0. NaCv A peon
0155
RPUD
1.7
0300111,7W54
5366481
L07 3 BLOCK t MEADOW OAT( W
IS
Mt;4k. Ckcb.
I
1
1!5}6+)00.10 ADf711ION
112. SIE. 1111 N, 1111W
."I olk_MN 56.167
IA -i P-
01591,
0POD
17
1 0711111,10954
.4 11
LOT 4. BLOCK 7, MEADOW OAK 3(d
�7/4S 64aPlsr-Ckcb.
_
-
IISS06/07440 ADMXDN
SI/?.516 TITIN, R74W
- - -
'M-tCda+_MN 55307
TorryD 0.MICIwbR louroN_J_O
3E9�
IT PDD
17
0407
11.164054
159707
LOT 5 BLOCK 7. MEADOW OAW ktl
IISSp57m7Q'0
7741 M.Dl-w CKb,-
ADDITION
SI/7. SIE I171N. R74W
k4niCoeo. MN 563_01
DmormK (-kw
01141-
1.7
0311
SId M954
747E JD
101 I, BLOCK I, MEADOW OAK AM
SJIu I W 307014>Ua
-�
- -
- _
155059001010 ADDITION
111/7. 510. II71N .4w
law_ R_ynxu6K im 56"1 LD0o11a-
RRA
17
0637
11.70954
580E 9S
1312. Bt OCK 1. MEADOW OAX 4m
-0631
-
155059MIM ADMON
-LOT
_4W
51/2 SIE, 1111N%
Sm9
3-
0797
ARID
17
03.0,
11`_76954
544465
J BLOCK 1. MEADOW OAK 4m
-
- -
-
I..SgAppINO ADDITION _
11/2116. II71N A)4W
r,
S.-0169
RRN
11
0777 51.70954
376/93
LOT 4 BLOCK 1, MEADOW OAK AM
I'yS 6'A 001040 Aq)IIM3N _
SI/7. !161171 N,%4W
'51-SRw
0175
pROD
17
OTIC 51.760M
_57t6 60
101 S BLOCK 1. MEADOW OAK Am
1550:4(010.0 ADMIDN _
61/7. 1110. 1171N,%4W
&-
S1n4
1 0161
IT
17_
0711 11.70954
_371514
LOT 0 BLOCK 1, MEADOW OAK AM
1
ISS_oW'M1000 ADg110N _
!I/7. 110.1171N R74W
171-
9mw
0101
RRID
17
31_70954
_ SN750;
LOT 7, BLOCK I, MEADOW OAK 4m-
_0730
1550590110/0 ADDITION _ _ _
11/7_. SIE T171N_%4W_yKrq
S-_ _
0)p6
pRlp
_17_ _
0741 51.70954
$313831
LOT 6 BLOCK I, MEADOW OAK AM
155079011060 AOOf1C _ __
SI/7.110.I171N %4W
_ - -
S>rIs
Slms
01b
RRA
- -
_ 17
-
0763 11,14154
-
_ SIw SJ
LOT 1, BLOCK 2 MEADOW OAR AM
1160WO17010_ADD(TON.__
! 1/7. lid 1121N 074W
SWro
Srrro
0736
RRA
17
0763 S1,700W
53595),
LOT 2ITT OCK 2 ML.DOW OAK AM
155056A(wm ADl11TION
11/7.516. 1171N R74W
_-
3-
5-
0756
RRA_
17
0307 51,70954
339100
LOT 3 BLOCW 2 ML.ADOW OAK 4m
_
155 OW 07.70 ADDITION
_ _
11/7.$1&1171N%4W
Sms
3,110
0795
RRA
_ _
17
0551 11.769 btu
544947
LOT 4 BLOCK 7. MLADOW OAK 4m
_
155650032010 ADDITION
11/7. 310. I171N 024W
5-
3-
RRA
0706 11,76064
.1/187
LOT IQ BLOCK 2 Mf ADOW OAK 4m
_0746
_17
155650007100 ,AD00ION
111. 116 117114 %4W
Sons
Salr
1 0711
RRA
17
_ 0760 11.76961
f3Y150
LOT 17. BLOCK 2 MLADOW OAK 1m
1__0703
I550690071A_ADDlKNI
IS1/7,
SI0.1171N %4W
S -
lona
1.7
0744 11,76.954
$30070
___
LOT 3 BLOCK 3 MEADOW OAK 4m
I
_RRA
_
ISSOl900]Q10 1001110N _ _
! 1/7.616 I171N %4W
Sins- - -
,SKTr- --1__
0717
_
RPllp _
I
0?e0V�11.709M
_ 1330591
Popo 4
'MEADOW OAK TRUNK STORM SEWER EXTENSION'
ALTERNATE 'B' (Dlp
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT NO.
CITY OF MONTICELLO. MINNESOTA
OSM PROJECT NO. 1748.59
Popo 5
ASSISSFD
AREA
ASSFSSLD
PARCEL ID,
SECIION.IOWNSNIPB
AREA
ASSESSMENT
LOUNAEN7
JRAtf PLR-SSMENI
NI)MBFR
ARpfXVIA1F0lfO AI OI YRIPIK)N
'7AI7f.E
AOIMFSS
OWNFR
lArnnl
7ONIN0
PAXOS
ARIA
AFA AMOUNT
LOT 1, BLOCK 4 MEA OWOAK AM
i
155069-004010 ADDITION
51/7. SIB, T121N R74W
Sanw
'SA'ro
040_.
R -PUD
12
0484 $1.76954
S61�951
1015 BI OCK 2. MEADOW OAK 411
7701 Mo . Lara
ISSOtA-007O50 ADDITION
51/7. SIB TI71N. 074W
M-101010 MN56157
Mk;noolD BXo11yV Dnr.IB
0720
RPLOD
1,7
0714 51.76954
$347351
LOT Q BLOCK 2. MF ADOW OAK 4m
P O Boy 1036, Mo Iw5 a.
111
:155059-00'7060A
_51/7. SIB, I12IN. R74W
MN 55397
Gkx1UG Gana
0 17
RPUD
1,7
0714 51.740,54
$771.1!1
LOT 7. BE OCK 7. MEADOW OAX 4In
7741 M --taro
151050007010 ADDITION
51/7. SI B. I121N R74W_Mu
IK:W ,MN 55151
N"6C BPGIWU J. to
O.IN
R -PUD
17
07711
$1.26954 _!281
93
LOT B BI COCK 7. ME ADOW OAK 4In
2/61 Moab. Lona,
1550.9 �JOBO ADDITION
_ 1 /7. 518. 1171 N. R74W
S
M( K111CV W MN 65152
I! 'K O B InKTV K- A -.-,I
- -
0 197
--H-Pull-
1 2
0 7341
$1.26954
$3110 171
-
LOT 9, Bl OCK 7. MEADOW OAK AM
2181 Mo . 1 -,
1550.007090 ADDITION
5 1 /7. SI8 1121 N 024W
Mnnlic.1o. MN 55157
G ap C IaKUn
-
0 107
R PUD
1 7
02301
- -i
$1.76954
$'797 .'-0
101 11, BLOCK 7. MI ADOW OAK 4In
arw
7871 Moab. L-
155
.1550'9077110 ADDITION
S I/7.SI8.II7IN.R74W
_ Mmlk:o4o. _MN 55367
iKarlJ KKm�nrrolv
0711
R.WD
1.2
020_0
51.76954
_S,7JI7_S9I
LOT 1, BLOCK 3, MFADOW OAK 4M
7700MwA1,). lona
1551Y9003E710 ADDITION
S 1/2. SIB 1111 N, R74W
- -- _ -
Mn1Ik:oM MN 5,'.107
-
�Po1K RIMA MoyfbB _
0795
RR1D
12
0754
$ON 54
_5(54947Y1I
LOT 2. Bl OCK 3 MI ADOW OAX dM
7120 M,- Lana
1550.013070 ADDITION
151/7 SIB, 1121N. 074W
McnMcMMN M362
IbomoyJ 6SnolL C1.
024_5
R&PIIO
12
0'19(5
91.1695(5;_531375
t Ol 4 Bl OCK 3, ML ADOW OAK 4In
1140 M -w 1 ane
155,Mp 173690 MDITION _ _
-
S 1/7. SI61171N_R74W
- _ _-,
MmllCuu'1_MN 5:.187
IKIr1I S4vneo8 ARIYM.nm
--- - - --
_OY71
-
RPI10
-
12
-;
O'1B6L
--
$1,2.54
---;-
5338711
-- LOT 6 B1OCK3, MEADOWOA94m
2700 Moab. lana.
tS6WA01;X= ADDITION
51/7518, 1171 N. R74W
Ma11K:oIb._MN %SM2
P.I. ARa.a: V NWy__O?77
RPUO
1.7
0766 $1.?. 54
_573871
LOT 6.BLOCK 3 ML 066WO" AM
28c.) MW . L-
15509IM 00VADDITION _ -
- -
-__,S 1/2.518 ll21N,R24W
-' - _ -
'Munik:oeu MN 55,1(57
IImnLD BIkIK Ih>•✓on
_
0711
OEUD
1.2
0257 _91,7. S4 i_
1771 d5
t01 7. BLOCK 3 MEADOW OAK 4.
71170 Ma torso.
11550WM1070 ADEVfION
5 1/7.5181171N, R74W
-- - ---12840
��M-11C.,b MN 55367
to A Wuft S D_
0771
R+_L_0
17
027/x' 91.769_54
_$35192
_ _
1018 BLOCK3 MLADOWOAK 4m _-
-
Moab. loan
IS50WOJIM ADDITION_
-_
51/7. 518_ 1111 N R74W
_ --.
Ml 1n 5a MN 5.5367
C1wbL(BJOAMM&KIM
-_-__ -
0750
_R -PW
1,1
0,3(10 31.169.54_9380/6
- _ _
_-
-_
PO 8o,1AM SI Ck,ua
155010001010 IOII_BIOCXI. BRW7OAXISISIATI
51/71181171N, R74W
MN56307/469
CBSWS1 Ch
0N3
RaI_
1
0161 !1.71054
!46004
15507001710201O11. IR OCK 1, 0MAR OAKI S I ST ATI
5 1/7 518 1171N R74W
%n
9rmo
_0041
RI
I
_0641_81.76054_587139
14'07OO11O30 LOT 3.BLOCX I, ORIAROAKISFSIATF
51/2,5I81171N, R74W_Sc
Snmo
_OMB
RLI
1
0608 $1.26054
$771 RA
ISfA701O1060 1 O15BI4?CK 1_MA7OAKFSISIAIF
51/7318 f121N, 074W_9nme
Sora
0571
R1
1
0571 $1.76969 _
SMI 43
15OMIVC`O 1016.BLOCK I.BRIAROAKISIS7AF
51/7.SIBI121N 574W
9rsns
31-
0637
PI
I
0637_$1.1.54
S.31
155010001010 LOI1_BLOCX I, RPM OAK.IS I STATE __51/2,5181121N
R74W ___,S'Inw
Senn
0469
R -I
__ 1__
04. !1.76954 _-$59$47
Popo 5
Popo 6
'MEADOW OAK TRUNK STORM SEWER EXTENSION'
ALTERNATE 'B'
(OIL)
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT NO.
CITY OF MONTICELLO.
MINNESOTA
OSM PROJECT NO.
1748.93
A4F.SSED
MFA ASSLSSFD
PARCEL ID.
SCCOON. TOWN94:P8
1M(Ac-)
EA
JASSISSEVIENI
LQUIVALENI
ER
RATE PASSESSMCNINIIMBFR
ABBRFVIAUDIFrAL DFSCMPTION
'>ANOF
ADDR[59
OWNCR
lOMNC.
RAIK35 AIWA
ALA AMOUNT
156070001050 LOT B. BLOCK I, BIIIAR OAKES ESTATE
5)/7.5 IS, T12 IN R74W_
Smo _ ___
Snrtn
OYB
R-1
1 0548
ST,269.54
SODS""
155070001100 107 IO BLOCK I, BIBMOAKFSFSTAIF
_ S_ 112. SIB: 112IN R74W
_Smo
Smn
0279
R1
1 0770
51.7MY
SJY 701
P O, Boa 1486, 51. Clan
155070001040 LOT 4. BLOCK I, BRIM? OAKES ESTATE
SI/7. S IS. 1121 N. R74W
MN 505477_7486
Rw" BWOon of Sl. CWd
0368
ITT
1 07651$1.769541
346710
1045 N Ebvfl Pbc9.
153070001090 LOIO,BIOCKLEIRV.ROAKISFSIAIE
S 112. S 18, 112 IN. R74W
N4KnK.I1 MN 55367
M MBEa1NUL.SKatm
0350
0.1
107.'0
31_76954 1
SYI 341
I
BNO ,Mantlau4o. MN
1155070001110 10111. BLOCK I, BRIM OAKI S I STATE
51/7. SIB. 1171N R74W
55367
Way V.8 Pufrl "w
0357
R1
1 0752
$1.76954
3440 Btl
'
PO Bo. /486 11 Clan
.101 1. BE OCK 7. BI71AR RAKES ESTATE
S 117. S 18. 1171 N. R74W
MN 567(54!_7486
CBSo1 SI CL.
0550
RI
1 0550
$1,76054
$70967
:155070=020 'LOT 7. BI OCK 2 BRIML OAK[$ ESTATE
1! 112. SIB. 1121N 074W_
SKn6
S.-
0470
RI
1 0475
$1.269541_$60703
155010002= ILOI7 B_LOCK7.BRIMOAK[SFSIAIE
S 1/7, 518, 1121N, R74W
Same
Smn
0454
R-1
1 04_54
51,76054
_$57677
ISS
1155010002050 ;LOT 5. BLOCK 7, MIM OAKES [STATE
I/7. SIB. 1171N. R74W
;V-
5-
07031
0.1
1 0 703
$1,76954
S89249
.155070447745411 1O16.BLOCK 7. BFBAR OAKES ESTATE
11/7. SITE 1171N. P24W
(Sono
Sarno
0we
P41
1 0608
51,76054
_5771_88
I5SO7D007070 �LCl 7. BLOCK 7. BRIAROAKISISIAfE
ISI/7. SIB 1171 N. R24W
kmo
![ern
0407
RI
1 0407 $1.76054
551036_
1530/D00AW LO78 BLOCK2_0I7IMOAKFl ISIA_f[__I5112,
SIB_II?IN R74W
Sane
Fern
0285
RI
1_ 0255_51,260.54
_3.16187
1153070/011(13 LOT IO BLOCK 7. BITI1M OAKISCSIAI[
15117,510. 1121N R74W
1m6
&-
0201I
RI
1 _0_701 $1.269m
_575614
IU0/0O07170 LOI l 2_ BL CCK 7. MIAlI CAKE l FSIATF
131/7. 515712 IN. R74W
S-
kKrn
1446
RI
1 I,YB', II.M954
_11,�7�70
L55010102130 Of 13, 010417. N8AA OAKISISIAIE
!1/7518. MIN R74W
I-
Sine
0400
PI
1 049_6, 11,76054
S62969
155070007160 LO116, M ggg];BEBMOAKCSISIAI[
!1/7. 115. 1171N R74A
k4-
Bcen6
�>mn
0770
R1
1 0770 $1,760641
IY7)e
153070037170 10117,O1OCK2 ORIMOAKFSElTAIF
_ _ _
SI/?.SIB. II?IN.%4W
krno
074
R 1
--
1 O2M 11,26054
130077
-
939 Pan"o L41 "e1
155013007040 lOf A. BLOCK 2 QLAY OA41151AT[
3 112, SITE 1121N. R74W
MN 563/7
7575 Ono OOk. BBa
RaCl D. 8 Pable L Caere
0464
at
1 0 464 11.769 64
{580 07
153070O77WD LOI 9, BLOCK]. Bf71MOAKISISIATF
SU2.SUEI121N_R24W
MdHKolb_MN 55367
K4.V-.A A91-LJtr.Mxn
- -
_05411
RI
I 03f11 11,2606A
138713
- - -
kAllh A41rlK:oln MN
155070077110 LO1 11, HOCM ?. BRIM 7)AA7 S FSTATE
! I/1. 518. 1171N R74W
55367
IelLO R 8 Am L °1i09p1K1p10_
0 7111
�R 1
1 0 ]81 11,)x9 54_
_ SM /4
Popo 6
`MEADOW OAK TRUNK STORM SEER 'EXTENSION'
ALFERNAIE V (BID
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT NO,
CITY OF MONTICELLO. MINNESOTA
OSM PROJECT NO. 1748.93
Pape 7
ASSESSED
AREA--DPARCEL
0
SECTION, IOWN51fIP 6
AREA
ASSESSMENT EOUNALLNT RATE PER
--INI
14UMPFR
A.BI9.1MI6) 111A1 01Y.R1111ON
RAN,,F
ADOf7155
OWNFR
IACNnn
70N!NG
FIAT"
APFA ALA
AMOUNT
SI -11, M9nTkalo, MN
ISS070007140 LOT 14. BOCK 2 BRIM OAKES FSTATE
5 1/2 S18, 1171 N, P74W
6SM2
'VWWY G.6 MOYB Sc"UT
0477
of
1
047231,769.!1
$535151
P O B,. 7466. St. CKo
15507000)1.9 LOT IS RIM BLOCK 2 BOAKLS FSTATF
SI/7. SIB. I171N, 9?74W
MN 56307.7456
Ro107o Bo1nor1 o15l CI.,A
0450
P1
1
0450 51.70954
$57179
7161 6611 Shoot N W.
155061-001010 Oollot A SANDBFRG FAST
N 1/2 SIE. 1171N. R74W
Lkwg Lai, MN 55358
1Pcd W E. A Koran D Nool
17.534
0.1
1
17.534 51,769 54
$77.76016
155001-COIUM LOT I. BLOCK I, SANDBI RG FAST
N 1/2. SIB, 112IN, R24W
Sono
Sana
0579
0.1
1
0579 71,269.5A
$67159
9801 Goon Avptlq N E..
155061001010 LOT 7. NOCK I, SANDBPG FAST
N I/2. SIB. 11211, R74W
MW -W MN 55361
Cunt C e DkM C Ib
0475
0.1
1
0475 $1.769.54
5603 U3 t
7770 Canty Roan 39 N L.
IS}0610=10 LOT L BLOCK 2. SWOBERG FAST
N 172 5141171 N. P74W
MMikolb, MN 55307
Pao -14 Sc-\ n
0563
R-1
1
0563 SI.169.54
$714 IS
606 LaGwr, D6w. VonlCo
ISS 061007070 1012 NOCK 7, $ANDORG [ASI
N 1/7. SIE, 1171N. R21W
If 34785
.ka , W SoKfiarO
06{10
9.1
1
0 5C 31,769.S1
_ 563.1 /!
15S410YXW TOT SNOOK 7_SAND6IPG[ASl
NI/7_91E. 11711. P74W
Sano
Sm
0500
ITA
1
0500 $1,76951
363471
155001 ODXM LOT 6. BLOCK 7, SANDO[n FAST
NI/2. 516.1171 N, R74W
5amo
Sora
0500
P-1
I
0500 $1.76951
563477
155861077070 1017. NOCK 2, SANDIK RG [AST
N 1/2. 515. 112IN. R74W
S-
Sona
0500
P-1
I
0500 $1.26954
711
15541077080 1016. BOCK 2. 5ANDB PG FAST
N 1/2516, T121N P74W
Sono
S77no
0M
Rat
1
050D 11,700W
-2634
5634771
I5641 OYMK) LOT 9. BOCK 7. SANDB[RG FAST
_ N 1/7. 516, I171_N. R24W
Sero
"
0 YID
RA
_ 1
0507 51,76_9 54
_$634 77
155410)7100 IBI IO BOCK 2. SANDN RG EAST
NI/25141121N, R74W
Sang
4Krur
0500
R1
_I
_0170 $1.76954
3634771
15kC1OR) 10 10111, BOCK_7_SANDOIfir F A51
NI/2. _S I IT, 1171 N. R74W
,%-
SCPp
0500
PI
1
0500 11,77.954
_ $63477
155061007170 10112. BOCK 7. SANUN PGf AST
N I/2, 31 B. 1121N, 117410
SKno
51-
05Itl
P-1
1
1 0 s 71,76954
_$634171
ISS06110r17110_10113. BOCK 7. SANDBRGFAST
N 1/2_316, 1171 N, R74W
Bunn
YKne
05M
RA
1
O,YD 11,2W 5Ai_
S6Y1 I7;
16il410W10 IBI I, BOCK. W1001RG (A51
N1/2.318. TITIN. P24W
Sires _5>
060D
0.1
1
07110 11.76051
1.934 1?
1554100.1070 1012 BCICKS SANT36T RG F AST
N_ 177. SIB 1121N, 024W
31-
9rnr
0600
P-1
1
0600 11,7_6954
IAL 77
9721 GO -T Avmtoo N f.
15541 DVMO_IOI3 BOCK 2, 5AN[IBRG [AST
N IR. 316._1121N. P24W
A10nTko60. MN 6S,M?
,J"m _ CCAWM Nobtn
06ED
of
1
0500 11,269 54
-L?
155061002(l40 1014 BOOM 2. IANDB RG FAST
NIR. 31411211. R74W
Sl
,S.
obw
R1
1
06670_11,7694
163111
Pape 7
�PARCEI ID I
NUMNR ABNXVIATFD IFGAl I7FSCRPIION
1155-061 OW 140 ILOT 14. BLOCK 7. SANDBERG IASI
IISS-071{g101D 001 1, BIOCK I. FA51 VIEW
IISSO/1d01e20 007 7. BIOCK I, EASE VIEW
III-MM-30
LOl ] BLOCK L EAST VIEW
15SO71 OD1040 L014. BLOCK I, FASI VIEW
I W&WI000010 OUTIOI A FAST VIEW. BATIIF RAPID!
115.%We00300 OUTIOT C. MEADOW OAK
156O43Om400 OLRLOI D, MCADOW OAK
NA OUTI 071 MEADOW OAK
155013-001(1(10 IOlfR 01 J. AIFADOw OAK
IISS0130017(D OUfl01 L MCAOOW OAK
15SO434M = 101/11 Of M. W ADOW OAK
AOPONy out03u of ctry mnitL north of
TNA lcpnfy -,d 15
Rop tV 00030 d cBy 1tnitL WUM of
HA cant rood 75
IBLRIP/G10N NORIFQRN RAILROAD I6GM-
NA 06 -WAY
nATI OF MN • ASUINLILI:
IInterstate Highway No. 94
IatAt AIUVLAKII MOP91 Il
I
WEADOW OAK TRUNK STORM SEWER EXTENSIOM
ALTERNATE V (alq
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT NO. _
CRY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
OSM PROJECT NO. 1748.93
-SSES4D
l
SECTION. TOWNSIV 6
IJWN"
ARE
ASS Ni
�I VAIENIRAAPER.NIADDOF55
2OMNG
f
MI"'k. pl OMo.
541/2, SIB 112IN R24W
1213
M-ticouO, MN 55367 MCI. G. 6 DOrou3 HO&-
0663-
P-1
1
06W.$1,769.54
S714.75
P,O. Bo. 1247. MmtlCob.
N (/2516. 1121N. R24W
MN 553071247 ..-T.f1h..Inc.
1
0552
R-1
1
0552 $1.769.51
170079
149 RNofvbw Drw.
N I /2 516. I I21N. R24W
Monticello. MN 55367 117_W Com
0 426
R 1
1
04261 $1,26954
$54083
N W.. MupOo Lcho. MN
NI/2516. TI71N_R2AW
55]56
]Mmt"lo,
Lary J S Gant L. Corton
0390'
RI
1
0,39,1$1.269.54
$495,12
670 RlvaMow D4ro.
N I/2516.1171N. R74W
MN 65367
fthm3 C. A lm flk, OorR
0653
R-1
1
06W $1.269.51
$12901
P O. BO. 1247. Mon tlC oho.
N 112 S16. 117154 R24W
IP553621241 rnwton lopomm, Inc.
2.573
R-2
1
7.573 $1.269.64
$326653
SI/2, SIB. 1121N R24W
ILL ,IPly-VLNM 56"11111ro HorrpL M.
7.340
PAID
1.7
6,Ba6 11,76964
$11,167.131
3I/2, SI IL 1171 N. R24W
IT- IS-
6650
RPLED
1.2
10670 11.76x61
1134675/
51/2516. 1171N. R24W
Is- 1.
9560
R4UK7
1,7
11,490 11,269.54
$1459466
c/o Fmn Crow SmAcm
375 JOclu- Shoot. 31.
7 1 /7. 111, 1171 N. R24W
Poul MNL N 56101 16:4 Cron Orr* of St, PO
4 Yd
R-R1D
1,2
6 737
$1.26954
16617 25
1112. 1161171 N. R24W
Sow IS_
3000
RAID
1.2
36001 $1.269.64
$451036
31/2, 516, 117TH R24W
Sono lura
0610
PAD
14
0912 11,20054
$1,234001
516, 1171N. R24W
NA MonOcoso I -rd to
77649
WON D
1
72 649 11,769 54
$26 763 6111
516, 1121N. P74W
NA Taro
38 We
WOM'D
1
36,6011 $1,769 64
I
6491'A n
316. 1171N, R24W
BvM01m N vffl
NA frmw-lo6m Cc.,F-W
2296
U70MD
1
7296 11.76054
$2,914671
11.260 54
1
N In. $16, 1171N R24W
10,300
LNIOM D
1
16 3mI 11.760 54
170693 54
109 MY! $1.760.64
1753610(01
167716
I
Paco 0
PARCEL ID
NUNR[R IAFlAWl IATTOtFC:A1 DFSCMMON
NON-ASSFSSABLF MIOPFGIIIf'
155-0"-000010 IOUTLOI A MEADOW OAI(FSIAIE
15' 000070 IOUIIOI E. MEADOW OA( ESTATE
(CRY WhIOI WOy
IOTAS NON•ASSIFUSIF KOPIPTIIS
noun
I
IASSISSMIKI SATI SCHIWLI:
I lom
CIASSIIICAICN ARI A AS9 SSM) NI
RA110
AO
Ap4CWMo-0141n51wCo
0.6
_
RI
Sbpb IOm4yPoWWntl(y
1.0
-� G7
SlrA1b a 21 omM GUYc/ontlal
I.0
R3
Mu01um L7oMl�uunonikY
1,1
44
M0Ulo lum fes
17
R LW_RuY.Wnirn [knn0 L1NI D_OvokyxMnl
I_.2
_
Mvtnmcmco lml • ROlkfunl�l
1.7_
_PIR
PIM
Purinmwr.cu lmo • Ml.ab
1.7
Nd5/4xvl Dues_"
2.1
_BI
07
1SnnM Bur4wu
2.1
Ba
lapnwr BuwWG
2.1
_
B4Roplannl
lMNwo
2.1
eC'
hlwou C(mryA
1.9
I It
v! MUSIISY
2. I
II
Nu(tv�IranM[I
2.1
3cnM Naac Scl><.Y
1.4
'MEADOW OAK TRUNK STORM SEWER EXTENSIOW
ALTERNATE 'B'(010
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT NO.
CITY OF MONTICELLO. MINNESOTA
OSM PROJECT NO. 174893
SECTON. TOWNSHIP e
'7ANOf ADDRFS OWNER
PO. 60. 1147. MOnW.D..
S I/7. 518. 1171N, P24W MN 55367 Ory Ot Mon.l
S 112, 518. T 121 N P24W 5oro Sl -
15 15.
l-1515. 1121N R74W Sores I—
ISATI FOUAfl.,
RAIL .00lAt COSIS ).t / TOIA) A4 A
%-. P --t Of C(nlrnri (tfOCYnOni
Al A_Aawurl 1(jSlr(b.nl Hoo
Iota Cost .
ALA_
I_RAh
P000 9
ASSESSEDAREA MASSED
AREA (ASSESSMENT LOUNMEN) Jf A. PEG ASSESSMENT
(Acrm) lOMNC RAt10S ARIA AEA AMOIIM
7050 C.compt E.contPtl
11.740 L.Co-Ol E—wl
01 6% L.comPl 1 ¢O.npl
45 480 T.rompl F.cm ,ll ,
1
7537ne sZriNn nu!
I
� I
I
IM.611107
1roro I__ _ I
I9V
S 1.76954
. T
Drown By
R.G.D. SOrr
chelan
Ma *ran
Dote- Aesoclate
SEPT.i.Pisms.r.. 3v ... P.-
Mo ...... 1. 4
1993 up wl. 1=. Will IM
ASSESSED AREA
Drowng litle Comm. No,
MEADOW OAK TRUNK 1748.93
STORM SEWER EXTENSION
ALTERNATE "B"
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA B
eni.rwh
1560YOU110 107101LOCK4MFADOWONUSIAIE 5112.$10.Tl?IN.R24W S77no 5- 0293 0PLO 1,7 0)57 21„771717 14641/I
1550Ym4W 1015VOCK4MCADOWOAKf51ATt 51/2.518TIVNR24W 1,- 5,- 0471 RAA 17 0605111,17011 $666951
16.10440(110'D IOI60lOCK4MIADOWOAKTSIATE 5112.118,1121NR24W 3666 Sme 04N1 RAD 17 0816 $1,37017 5/[0421
IS5000110/0 LOT 1. PAOCK4 MEADOW OAK WALL S 112. SILL 1171N, R74W Sm SK7r 0451 RRA 12 0541" 1/14481
Popo I
'MEADOW OAK IRLINK STORM SEWER EKTENSIOM
ALTERNATE
D
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT POLL
r r^G I
I m'
nary a ray
PROJECT NO.
JY
CITY OF MONTICELLO. MINNESOTA
OSM PROJECT NO, 1748 93
PARCEL
InPPOFVIAfCD
-C'-N. LOW :"a
ASSES NI
OI�DNIIAEAPER
ASSF�.NI1
J
NUM -fl?
IfE:AI IXSCfKPIKJN
AOOPF55 OWNER
1AMA
7nMM
Su1To 100. X130 Nanxn
I
lZEL"LM10 101 LBIOCK3 MFADOWOAK(SIATE
5112.SIB T171N R74W
Lora Plwtft MN 55141 Llta1lorrm KtC.
0131
P -PLC
1.7
03911$1,37017
SS74)I
IS6O4400.)(170 LOT 7. BLOCK). MLADOW OAK[STATE
1 2310. 1171N P74W
SAME SAME
0255
Rfall
1,7
0301 All. 2017
SAM 97
1650"00VW 1011 BLOCK MEADOW OAK I STATE
31]2,510 T121N R74W
SAW SAME
0,243
RAA
1.7
I
- 0797, 5_137017
_5384%��
155044-0=100 LOT 4 BLOCK 3 MEADOW OAK ESTATE
S 1/7. 510, 1121 N R24W
SAME SAML
0777
P-PLID_
_ 1,2__
0376.
5.1N 17 _54109.01
1550Y00.1N0 LOT 6 BLOCK) MEADOW OAK [STATE
51/7. Ste II 21K R74W
SAM( SAME
0279
RAID
17
03)551,37011
--
1
Su19y ,
7506 MOaK A-
oat
1550140M110 LOT S BLOCK) MEADOW OAK ESIAIE
51/2. SILL 11 21N. R24W
MunTCoWn_MN 65307 Watn9 E.a 00n -J, WVR
0379
Rpm
1.7
0455_317701/
SHD41
7011 Moa1A>.. Oo t-
155044 (KW70 lOi /. BLOCK 3 Mf ADOW OAK fSIAIE
51/7.510, 1171N, R740t
Mrnitulk>, MN 5Sb7 !WI] D a BnrWo K Wobfvod
-
0266
R PW
1 7
0318
$172011
_$419 67
2615 Mou . CK* taro,
I550YQ110110 LOf O BLOCK 3 Mf_ ADPANOAK ESTATE
S112_S1BI171N _R74W
1MtrVICOM: MN 55b7_INmmN e{VrrtM AAl"11.
0354
RP110
I7
047551,3701/
$(+1)811
2585 WNIo 0o1 CKCK7
ISSOY L1017A l_019, fY OCKI MC ADOW OAKfSIAIE
I 7318.I171N. R74W
M-Wwk,. MN55367 Pdnn W_e BwOMJ WoyTwr
0483
RPW
1.1
0580
�13:1117,�/05I
7580 W19117 o"k CK w,
16_.(040DJ 100 I OIIQBLOCKIMEADOWOAK(SIAI(
LIJ7, SILL II?IN. R74W
M_uttCdn, MN 56167 St -J e5ando Perm
0452
_R qID
17
05471
$1,37117
2607 MooaOw OaK Leto
!1550Y fN 110 101 I I, BLOCK S MF &DOW OAK f51AfE_
S I[7. 5_ � _ie 1171_ N _R?4W
M[ntlCdb_MN ;il_367 61 G A e Jwr?o M Bwr*1Q
__ _
0 360
-A
RA
1 2
0 4 111
S� _37017
S57D 11 1
2105 Moab« CK* Lora
1
:1(0/(10)170 10117. BLOCK 1 MfADOWOAKI SIATC
31(7i18y1171NP74W
NknWOW, MN Mkt J_e IAIK L.vOLLH[nt Vc-
. _
_o��4
_n_AID
_I_7
0)11
_
_;1.3 _
349/44
P O Bo. 1058 ?003
%A..1o. O1 Lara
1550441113110 LOT 11 BLOCK) MFADOWOAK (STATE
51/7.51A, 1171N,P74W
M-W.W, MN&SM2 XUN 9&I -K T, -c
0297
RAA
12
0)56
31.37017
$470511
7601 Mwxlor Oak
1550440111140 LOT 14.BLOCK3 MFADOWOAKFSIAIE
SI12SI8 T12IN R74W
Mt 1-1 ,MN 55167 WLbmJ Aw-loN fm
0791
P-RIn
17
0317151.17011
S" 11
Sale Im 3m H d-
1,-, 4 K0010 LOT L BLOCK 4 Mf ADOW OAK I SIAL(
All? 318 t I21K R24W
L- PM wM MN 56411 II6o fKn1o4 hC
n Y8
R AIO
1,7
0418
51.37011
V61 10
155 OU OnWM 1017. BLOCK 4 MI ADOW OAK ESTATE
5 112 310. 1121K R74W
SKro s-
0713
RAA
1,2
0328
11.37017
3437491
1560YOU110 107101LOCK4MFADOWONUSIAIE 5112.$10.Tl?IN.R24W S77no 5- 0293 0PLO 1,7 0)57 21„771717 14641/I
1550Ym4W 1015VOCK4MCADOWOAKf51ATt 51/2.518TIVNR24W 1,- 5,- 0471 RAA 17 0605111,17011 $666951
16.10440(110'D IOI60lOCK4MIADOWOAKTSIATE 5112.118,1121NR24W 3666 Sme 04N1 RAD 17 0816 $1,37017 5/[0421
IS5000110/0 LOT 1. PAOCK4 MEADOW OAK WALL S 112. SILL 1171N, R74W Sm SK7r 0451 RRA 12 0541" 1/14481
Popo I
PARCEL D
NLIMPER
WEADOW OAK TRUNK STORM SEWER EXTENSION'
ALTERNATE '8'
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT NO.
CITY OF MONTICELLO. MINNESOTA
OSM PROJECT NO. 1748 93
ASSESSED AREA -SSED
I I;ECIgN. iOWNSNIPA AREA ASSESSMENT EOUNAIENI 11ATU PER ASL SSMf NI
APPRFVIAif DIIGA DCSC(KPIgN 'RAN('[ .ZKME55 CYAME'R fAc-1 ZONING: RAIK]5 ARIA 4A AMOUNT
1-1. -1...r..,.,---- c In - 111- o04W Snw s1- 0539 RR10 1.7 0U71 $1,]7017 SM389
7016 Muafow Oak Lcro
1550"004040 L074 BLOCK 4 MEADOW OAK LSTATE
S 1/7. 5181171 N, 10741W
Mn; -10 M -N51307
&uNry E. B Cyllft- A Fyl
0305
RPUD
17
0366'
31/7. SIB_I171 N. 4?4W
IMunikdU. MN56,167
7646 Mot>< . OuO Low
0?09
_R_RlU
17
0373 $1,3'11717_
_U1615
1!}0 -OGOMB LOT 9, BLOCK 4_MEADOW OAK ESTATE
S 1/7. SIB, 7171N, R74W
MinikaU. MN 55367
Qawn J B All'. K GIY-
0 717
R -PVD
1 7
0 B;Mj
51/2 SIB. 1171N. RNW
%wic:.n, MN55367
184 Acorn CYCW.
0759
RPLJD
17
0311 11.37011
141031
155044 034100 TOT 10 810C1( MEADOW OAK ESTATE
SIB. 1171 N_R74W
M9nIkoN MN 1+5]07
Goy BDKKwE AnalvYal
0]75
R -PUD
17
04:A
SI/?. $IB II?IN. R74W
_51/7.
787 Acorn Cyclo
0749
R43
_
17
0799 S1,3?017 ,_539447;
__ __
- 1
I SSOYOWI IO LOM. BLOCK MFADOWOAK ESTATE
SI/7. SIB, 1171N, R74W
MIIkoYo. MN_;5367
Eht ,R W91Ion
0677
R -PUD
17
08061
51/7. SIB. 112IN R74W
Minikolo. MN 55361
760A.-Cir"
60 A.- CYOIo,
OJ7S
QR1D
I?
OJW_61.37.017_`SS14571
16504 004170 LOT 17. BI OCK 4 MI ADOW OAK ISI ATE
S 1/7. SIB. 1171N. R74W
M Ilk M_N_t5 7
MktKLI P A RoUocCo J. &,q
0 899
R POD
I.7
1 079
11/7.518, 1171 N. R74W
-BAIO
MKIIWOUP MN 55421!"P421!"P67
724A -CYCb,
_0308-WPI)D
17-
0370 f1.37011
-- - --
3487941
I SSO4 (J041J0 LOT 13 BLOCK Mf ADOW OAK [STATE
SI/7, 51A 1171 N, 074W
Munik64o. MN 55367
Il fflyF AG. -L. CaV-_
0678
RRJO
I7
08141
-
SI/7. SIA1171N. R74_W
'
Inn f�rna7m. MN S.'Wl
7NI7 MuoOor OM I -d
0?77
RIML
1.7
I
63
- -
I_1
155044004140 LO4 Ol OCK4 M_FADb.V OAK (STATE
51/2518, 1171N__R74W
Mll M.MN MM7
JOrurwM 8-0411
R,PLJO
17
_0493
- - - _ LOT I BLOCK I, MEADOW OAK 71K1
MntK:dU. MN 55367
7841 Roo 01* 1-
07:D
R WD
1 7
03(Il 31.370 1)
_13962.
- -1
$1.37017 _$4831111
$1.37017 51.17/96{
$1,37017 $594 LR81
$1.32017 SI,LIMW1
$1.371717 _$1.42470 iI
71.370-I l 51 01409
51,37017 $aI II
155045241010 ADOOION SI/7. SIB. 117114, R74W MmIrWU. MN 55367 W"dJ 6&rt .A 8-- 04.3 REVD 17 0 53 $1,37017 _$701 so
TOY 1, BLOCK 2 MEADOW OAK Ina 7861 Roo Ca CYCU. - - - - --
155045007010 ADDITION _ S 1/7. SIA 112IN, 074W Mnikoeo, MN_SS,N7 Mktm_ I G_IIAnon L IVIII 0 307 wR70 12--! 03_ -
41
- - LOT 7. (MOCK 7. MLADOW OAK 71K1 - - PO Do. 1190 MnH-W.
1550450070M AFXYTION 51/7.518, 1171N, R74W MN 66367 Ekv"I, fVA 0745 RARID 1 7 07_94
1013 BLOCK 7. MI ADOW OAK 71a
1550450070.10 ADDI1gN
1011. BIOCK 7. MEADOW OAK 71b
1 55 04 5 007010 ADDnION
101 6 BLOCK 2 MLADOW OAK Ina
155015 (1770!0 MDI7gN
LOT 6, BLOCK 7. MT AMW OAK Ina
165046(IY.IOW AIXNTION
TOT 1. BI OCK 7. MEADOW OAK Ina
15SM5007070 ADDngN
LOT 5. BLOCK 7. MI ADOW OAK Tb
ISSOIStlYAED ADDngN
1019. BLOCK 7, MLADOw OAK 711a
1550452471090 ADINIgN
LOT 10 (MOCK 7. MEADOW OAK 7.K1
113043007100 ,ADDOION
'01 11, BLOCK 22 MLADOW OAILro
7
155045(10/110 ADWK3N
71,37017 3486361
51,37017 _1388 13
Pogo 2
AU Rai OOY C.Ytlo,
31/7. SIB_I171 N. 4?4W
IMunikdU. MN56,167
KonrnT N_B Mo+OnrolA Kom
0?09
_R_RlU
17
0373 $1,3'11717_
_U1615
7880 Roa 0'. CYCU,
51/2 SIB. 1171N. RNW
%wic:.n, MN55367
Qt.G P.&W
0759
RPLJD
17
0311 11.37011
141031
78(ARo.JOLA Cycle,
SI/?. $IB II?IN. R74W
Mntko4o. MN 55, 167
I_kn yDt"
0749
R43
_
17
0799 S1,3?017 ,_539447;
__ __
- 1
010 MaAiov CNJY OINO.
51/7. SIB. 112IN R74W
Minikolo. MN 55361
MMW AIo.11)_
OJ7S
QR1D
I?
OJW_61.37.017_`SS14571
970 M..To. QY D.NO
I
11/7.518, 1171 N. R74W
-BAIO
MKIIWOUP MN 55421!"P421!"P67
,SI~M BD0 RQfm-1_
- -- - -
_0308-WPI)D
17-
0370 f1.37011
-- - --
3487941
-------
ITU Saw Ike-
SI/7. SIA1171N. R74_W
'
Inn f�rna7m. MN S.'Wl
Ultm ltmm hc.
- - - -
0?77
RIML
1.7
0337 11,37017,-$41M
- --
63
- -
940 Muock r Lk* D.
3 q2. 518, 1171N, R74W
MntK:dU. MN 55367
Rmk1 M McCoy
07:D
R WD
1 7
03(Il 31.370 1)
_13962.
9'A M14ul,.r (XA 01246.
s 1/2 SIB. 117114 04W
-`i
Mr&.0 MN 66.167
-Otr
,Scion P.A9W19WV �
0735,
RPIA
17
0717.11.37017
- - --
_{37779-
n) MnotkAY LANs
SI/211A1171N_R74W
MKkoel MN 66362
4kIKKaA 9,*"*0
0753,_0_RA
12_0
304 11.37011 _1400
AU
Pogo 2
PARCEL 0
'/TIMBER .13111 .11 D I FOAL IXSCRIPIION
LOT 1. BLOCK J Mf ADOW OAK Ina
15604SO03010 ADDITION
LOT 2. BLOCK 7 MEADOW OAK Ina
ISS4G460a3M ADOITION
LOT 3. BLOCK 3 MEADOW OAK Ina
15SW5003(W) ADDITION
LOT 4. BLOCK 3, MEADOW OAK 2W
'I!6 -0t5003040 ADXXIION
101 I, BI OCK 4 MI ADOW OAK 2MJ
1 66 0410040 1 0 ADDITION
101 E BLOCK A MEADOW OAK WxJ
M IA50LOB0 ADDITION
LOT 9. BLOCK 4, MEADOW OAK ?W
IS504500407o ADOITON
101 10 BLOCK 4 MEADOW OAK Ind
IIS WXl 341 p ADDITION
1011. BLOCK 6 MEADOW OAK Ina
15504500NET'0 ADDITION
L Ol6 BLOCK 6. MI ADOW OAK Ind
15w4sara6o ,ux3mon
101 I, BLOCK I, M[ADOW OAK 3rd
IiI11U57(DI010 AODRION
---TOI 2 BLOCK 1, MEADOW OAK 31a
It6115/011020_ ADORKIN
1013 BLOCK 1, ML ADOW OAK 3ra
1f505/(UI010 ALOHON
LOT 4 01 OCK 1. ML ADOW OAK 3ra
15505/(01040 ALX)RION
1016 BE OCK 2. MEADOW OAK Ya
1550!7007060 AODRION
L01 /, BLOCK 2, MEADOW OAK 3rd
1560570=70
560570=70 AD(IIION
LOT B BI OCK 2. ML ADOW OAK 3rd
Ib5mlar/oAo ADDITION
LOI 5 BLOCK 1. MEADOW OAK Ya
15S06)0)12'.o MORTON
LOT & BLOCK E M ADOW OAK 3rd
1!5051(01050 ADDITION _
1 OI 1, BLOCK I, ML MOW OAK Ya
1(.5,5/001070 ADDITION
-MEADOW OAK IRUNK STORM SEWER EXIENSIOW
ALTERNATE'S'
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT NO,
CTTV OF MON❑CELLO. MINNESOTA
OSM PROJECT NO. 1748.93
. 000
ASSESSED
AREA
ASSESSED
,IC11ON. TOWNSHIPS
AREA
ASSESSMENT IOUIVALE M 11AIEPIR ASSLSSMENI
RANOF
AD(MSS
OWNER
'ACIM)
IOMNO
RATIOS
AREA AIA AMOUNT
7540 Rua O.n L uro
S I/2. S 16 1171 N, P24N
Mmrk Wb, MN -SbX7
MIcl-1 A Sc -"I A P Z -c
1325t.
R PUD
1.2
030/ $1_77017 1
- -
$4-1556
-
905 MUaa9w 0.K DMR
5 1/2. 518, 1171 N. R24W
M_mlkolb MN 55.367
Itrrolny J, CnuCna
0,735
R PUD
1,2
0 2B7' 51.170 17
DINS ManIK9b./AN
51/2, SIB T171N R24W
55367
Wf-0W MW.Ie LA Jan!
0254
R -PUD
12
DYX! 31.17017
3402391
1975 MPoaow O,* DrN9.
5 1/2, SIB. 112IN, R24W
Aknll -lb MN_55362
-Qu-W S Alxn P IdmKy
0 756!
R POD
1 7
0 307' 31.370 17
5405 56
1(111 M-- C., rr
S 1/7, 516. I121N. P24W
M[nikob MN tu362
Borfy L. Dwtf
on.
R•WD
1 2
O 350
S 1_370 17
w2 59
7761 OoWbw. L-
aro,31/7.
3 1/7.SIB 112IN a24W
Mtxnkdb MN SSX7
RIafiYS A JRnnlfar J B,
0707,
11 PIR_
1.2
0242
71,32017
$37001
7141 OOKww Laro,
31/7. 716. T 121N R24W
iMInIk91b MN :.1367
KNA/�m.
APUD
12
0745_31.371117
$32_31E
7721 Ook Laro
_071L'
5 1/7, SI IS. I171N a74W
MMfkulb_MN SS367_Jrmm
F. A JOan M PULptCMY
0 193
R PUD
_1 2 _
O 777
$1,320 17
_
5305 /S
7142 OcK .taro.
S I/7. 516. 1171 N. AT4W
Mmikob. MN 55367
Hol B Kr.�9
0 156
-
R RIO
----
1 ?__._____0223
3
_ 51.370 1 /
_____-,-
$294 6e
- _T
21720ul LCmo.
S 117. SIA, 112IN. 024W
1.kn1-111 1 MN SM67
I D.Oq A X!DICSCN�
0188
R FKID
1 7
_0 776
$I,3/0 11 !_$Nl
831
2G41 God OIA t-
S 1/2. 518. 1121 N, 024W
MCnrk OW MN 4-X7
JF_e S/Kxm M BorruM
RM
o 499
_R_PUD '
1 2
0 !,99,51.320
17_
_s79012 1
7701 Roa Od LCun.
S 1/7.$161171 N R74W
M,nX.14 MN 6;w107
W1YmE W*.
-- --
_0311
RRID_
12
_O 37)1
-j
SI.J'70171_
-�
$497691
7/71 RRa Oi6 lmo
51 /?_SIA_I121N R14W
N S7_tfltl�A
Sknikulln MS,16
IA 9w(Muxcl
-
0776
-
_APUD
-
1.2
0331
-
$1,32017
341174
- -
SUI'. ITO 3m m -t-
F
5 117. 316. 112IN, IZ74W
tarn {'�rM11R MN YJ11 IT". H-- hr:
O 252
R R70 _
17
0 3381
31.370 11
_ $"6 /! I
S 1/7. S18, I17114 R74W
51-
Sr.ro
0 317
RRID
l 2
0 3981 31,320 1 / '_5525
96
71/7. SHE 1121N, R24W
Sam.
Sm.
0263-i!
I?
03161 $1,32017
$41665
31/7. E18. I171H%IW
sTn
!mn
0741
RRID
1,?
0316 _!1,37017
IA 1665
Vol Roa Oak Lon,
5I/2 SM 1121_N R24W
MUnikull4 MN 65X7
Oomb C Ka_ -N a htMKb 1NLip
o 7M
a RTD
1 2
0 377 71.370 17
-
_3424 5/_
- - -
2781 Pod Olk Luno.
3 1/7.316. 1171N R24W
MmIk- b MN 55,X7_
MLR a Lrnls J Gr-
0 762
R ND
1.7
033B 11,370 117
-
$s4e 75
_- - -_
?801 Rua 0[e t-
-
_
_
SI/?. 318 _I 171N_R24W
,Mmlkolln MN 55.1(.7
1CNnl-H ACA/" EUwt
0350
RPDA
11
0470I_71.3?017
_55554/
. 000
'MEADOW OAK TRUNK STORM SEWER EXTENSION'
ALTERNATE V
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT NO.
CRY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
OSM PROJECT NO. 1748.93
ASSESSED
MEA
ASSESSED
PAPCEL IO
Si CTION, TOWNSHIP&
AREA
ASSESSMENT
EOUIVAL N7 jlAllPlP ASSESSMENT
Nt1YPIR APAWMATED I FGAL DFSCP4'1K)N
9AN(;F
ADDRESS OWNER
(A-1
7019ING
RATIOS
AREA AFA AMOUNT
LOT I, BLOCK T. ME ADOW OAK JEW
7700 RW Oak 1- Y , I -Y W YIkKIT B M O
1550570MIO ADDITION
S1/2,515,112 IN P24W
MwIIc,go. MN 5&]02 A4kkntl
0788
P -0.)D
12
03401 51.]7017
545075
LOT 2 BE OCK 2. MEADOW OAK 31d
7410 FEW OKTK L-,
154�70W= ADDITION
51/7, SIB. 1171N P24W
Mmlk: MN SSM7 Dob R. B N -VA Oboe
0255
R -PUD
1.7
0]0051.77017
$40797_1
LOT l BLOCK 2. MEADOW OAK Uo
WiLAov-KT Coab.
j
156RD7-0D2TTM ADDITION
5117. SIB T171N R?4W
Mmtltu4o MN5]0
52 Brwo.l Pw
02591
IT PUD
1.7
0311 51.3017017
$41031
LOT 4 BLOCK 2. MEADOW OAK 1a
2145 Mq.-T Ckab.
`I55057{1071L0_ AIUITION
5112. SIB 112IN R24W
NA vlcuk _MN 55b2 Tony AMEN IT 1-
0389
P#PUD
1.7
0401 11,017
50 10701
-
ILO15 BLOCK 2. MEADOW OAA 10
2741 Mc> twooa CHrcw
I
AlOOION
S 1/2 SITE T121N R24W
M -,l .bo MN &5307 DuIDortlK ECC1a0
0314
P0. )D
1.2
0371 17 _320
! _5
5491 4
1155057-0OT750
ILOI ).BLOCK). MEADOW OAK 4m
Sumo 1[1130]0lknUor
155669-0m10T0 ADOPON
S1/2, SIB 1171N, 924W
Lan, Ply` -Ml MN 5W 1 Utra N9mok K,
TIME
P -PUD
1.2
0037 31,32017
S641.21_
LOT 2. BIOCK 1. MEADOW OAK 4m
I SSO'A 00107D ADDPION
51/7. SIB 11?IN R74W
5- 5-
I 0297
00.70
_ 1.7
0350_51,3701/
_$4075_9
LOT 3 BLOCK 1, MEADOW OAK 4m
I5S0_&91pIg10 ADDibN
5I/2. 518, 1171N, R74W
5- Strut
0189
R-PIID
1.7
0227 j1_3201/'_S299.1
101 4 (11 OCK 1. ME ADOW OAK Am
IM059(olUo ADDITION
S1/2, SIL 1121N P24W
51- 9.
0175
0PUD
12
071051.32017
- --
577/74
~I
1015 BLOCK I. MEADOW OAK 4m
I56m9DETImO ,ADDITION
31/2. 518,1171 N. R74W
tr>rno STro
-
OIBI
-
_R 0.10
-
1.7
0711 31,72011
- -
52110 /4I
-
-
0 BLOCK I. MI ADOW OAK 4m
,LOT
1550.WMIOfU ADDITION
LI /2. 31411)IN P24W
,Sumo Scm
R0.1D
l I,T
0770 31,370 17
$30411
1017, BLOCK 1. ME ADOW OAK AM
H.
IS6OWEDID70 AD(KION
SI/)_SIB. 1171N74`PW
Sm0 Stern
0200
R -PUD
17
0247111,37017
_3]7035]
LOT B UI OCK I, MEADOW OAK Am
15, 0 ,ET010S0 ADDITION _
! I/). SIS, 1171N P24W
7orw _ 5-
0230
P RID
1.7
0787 31.32017 I
$37387 1
101 I, BLOCK 7. ML ADOW OAK 4m
jI
1550.WO7A10 ADDITION
- _
;P74W
!1/7. SIB. TI2IN
SSl!-
umo
0730
IT PUL
1,7
07BJI_31.32U 111_
- -
3]738/1
-
LOT 2. BLOCK 2. MEADOW OAK 4m
15511!4(VXM ADDITION
SI/7. 318, II71N, R24W
,Smo SYmo
0250
R0.A
1,7
OJD/ !1,37017
S4ro Sn�
LOT l BE OCK 7. MEADOW OAK 4m
1550.500010.70 ADDIbN
3 1/7, SITE 1121N P24W
- -
_ S,- 51-
0795
R_0.1D
_
1 7
0354 11,37017 x_140/
34
1014 BLOCK 7, ML ADOW OAK Im
1550:NOU701D A7KDITKIN_
S 1/7. SIA 1121N 074W
Sm SInt
0)48_
IT PLA)
I.)
0798 11.37017
{.9788_
LOT 10 BLOCK 2 MEADOW OAK 4m
15S059a111m ADDITION
3I/7, 5IAII)IN_R)4W
" 3-
0717
Rw0.)D
1.2
07t0 11_77011
{343 11
LOT 17. BLOCK 2. MEADOW OAK 4m
IMGW,MI70 AIORION
31/7, S 14 T121N, R74W_,"
Y}114
070.1
RAID
1.2
0744_11.32011
_1]71.50
LOI 1 BLOCK 1 ME ADOW OAK 4m
I
I'w'059JD1030 ADDITION
31/7. 318, 1171N.V!TW
,lbro tYtTr
0)11
RWD
1.7
_0)00 tl_J7017{747/7'
Popo 4
PARCEt ID.
MINBER I!ll IAIIDI1GAL DFSCNIPIInN��ANC.[
LOT I, BLOCK 4 Ml ADOW OAK 411,
'MEADOW OAK TRUNK STORM SEW --'R EXTENSION'
ALTERNATE 'B'
PREUMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT NG
CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
OSM PROJECT NO. 1748.93
--D
SECI0N.IOWNSNIP6 AREA
A13.11 0.11T lAcros)
IOMNO
MCA ASST -D
ASSESSMENT FOUNAENi
RA(1O� AR[A
oAR PER ASLSSMCNI
AEA AMOUNT
155-090004010 ADDBK)N
SII7.SIS II?IN.R74W
51-
Sano
04M
RRID
1,2
0 4841
11,32011
$03^ 14
LOT 9 BLOCK 7. MEADOW OA( 4th
7701 M0000w law.
15S0700010IO LOT 1, BLOCK 1, 0167000AK_LSI SIA[[
SI/7.SI81171NR74W
MN WO 148E
CBS -or Sf Ckx
0363
RI
151 TIDDZW ADDITION
S 1/7. SIB, 1171N. R74W
MoIL16 o10, MN Slb7
MIct-I D. 8 Kolly V. Do &I
0,718
R-0LID
1 7
01741
$1.370 11
-5361.701
LOT 6 BLOCK 7. MEADOW OAK AM
0641
P O Boo 1036, MmWI-.
_$85415
1 5 5 010 0 0 1010 L0138tOCK1, BRIMOAKfSISIAI[
9 IL$181171NR24W
,9artw _SmK,
_ORIS
RI
151(15040070E0 AODnK)N
S 1/7, SIB 11?IN.IY74W
MN 55367
Gg G C.-
0,178
ITPUD 1
1.7
0?141
$1_37017
5181 W
TO? 1. BLOCK 7, MEADOW OAK Ott,
0671
2741 MucOow Law
$66761
IY'-0A001[L'0 1010 &OCK 1, 1176M 0AKf!(S1AR
l 1/7,1181171N, R74W
lrms
Stms
O632
RI
155059-007070 ADDIION
S 1/7. SIB, 1171N. 074W
MmlColk,. MN 55367
MaK [ e Pu14910 J Tho
0,180
R PUD
1.2
0 227
_31.,_70 17
_ _57_" 47!
101 B (ROCK 7. MEADOW OAK 4th
0469
1761 M9atl9w Law.
_$61910
UZOW00 (NK) A0D60N
S 1/7, 316 1171N. 024W
M_onik:u_b MN MM7
�Dc r 1n D 6 T" K A 0-1
0107
P -PK)
1.7
07361
11.32011
5312 W
_-LOT 9, BLOCK 2, MEADOW OAK AM
1781 Mou/ow law.
Il'.0500070P0 AD01IIOn
51/7,$18.1171 N, R74w
Mmttcob. MN 55307
1GroQC 1,4k,b
0107
RR1D
1.7
0?30
$1,37017
$30411
LOI I I. BLOCK 2 MLADOW OAK 4Th
7871 Moalow law.
155090007110 ADOION
51/7. SIB. 1171N. R74W
Mrn1k'o1o. MN 55767
Ka1JKIL-It g
0717
0PLO
I?
0760111_37017
_3543/)
LOT I, BLOCK 3. MFADOW OAK Ott,
2w N4-1 w law
1950600_0.1010 ADDITION
31/7. 518. T ITIN, R74WAknik;ue0.
MN 51b7
R11K 8 Lat A Mu_1'tKNt _
0,705
RRID
12
0394111.370,17
-
_Sb13411
-
l Oi 7. BLOCK 3. W ADOW OAK 4th
7770 hh o . Low.
IMM900.'KI,j AD(iIION
S 1/7, 518. 1171N. 074W
Mm_rcola,_MN%M2
OromoL J. a Stgll L. Cr
0747
RFw
1.7
0 294
_
51,37017
_ ---
--138813
LOT 4 BLOCK 3, MI ADOW OAK AM
7160 Me0[19w taw.
I910•A0_L1Y14I1 AD[711ION
SI/7. SIB, 112IN R74W
Yu Il o_b_MN54b7
Brunt. SovaDoa AlklblKChm
-
0777
Q -FW
1.7
02-11.320173761110
-
-
_
_
LOT S BLOCK 3 MEADOW OAK AM
2780 Mo . Law,
.115050003(YO ADDII-n
91/7. 7181171 N. 1?24W
Mm11COI16. MN Slb1
Pots IT 1%106-10CV Ba4�
0777
IT
1.7
02661
-0
11.37017
- _-
,__1751601
- 1I
LOT 0. BLOCK 3 MEADOW 0AK AM
IS5,0W003MET ADDIION
91/7_51.8112114 P74W
2&V M4 .law.
MmtK:otlo, MN 51167
LIK R9wm
Th -0 On
0711
R RA
-
_1.7-
0?93
11.371717
_ $334271
_ _
LOT 1. BLOCK 3. ML ACOW OAK AM
2520 Moto- 1-d--
ISS09000.10/0 ADDBON
S 1/7_$181111 N.R74W
MmWal16, MN 59367
IorrT A Wo1b65 D DxKr/ L
0731
RR)R
17
__077/-
_
- 11,3%1117
$36595
I 011 BLOCK 3 NO ADOW OAK Ort,
- -
7840 Mt-lko taw.
ISS!I✓o C10.YM0 ADD'ION
SI/7_S181171N R74W
IMmllcob._MN llb7_CtKKb1
._ _ f.6 Jo.VnM B,KiM
0250_0RK
17__0300
_
$1.370171
539601
P O Oo7 7456 SI Ck-1
15S0700010IO LOT 1, BLOCK 1, 0167000AK_LSI SIA[[
SI/7.SI81171NR74W
MN WO 148E
CBS -or Sf Ckx
0363
RI
I
_0363
$1.3:017 __5479771
155070001070 1017_BIOCK I. AR ROAKISISTAIF
31/1. 515. LWN.1?74W_Sllrne
S,-
ON1-RI
1
0641
$1370 I1
_$85415
1 5 5 010 0 0 1010 L0138tOCK1, BRIMOAKfSISIAI[
9 IL$181171NR24W
,9artw _SmK,
_ORIS
RI
1
0606
11.-7011
_$6026!
I151070OOILYO L0T 5010CK 1, 0OM 0AK[ S[SIATF
l 111$1& 112IN 024W
31-
i
0571
QI
1
0671
11,370.17
$66761
IY'-0A001[L'0 1010 &OCK 1, 1176M 0AKf!(S1AR
l 1/7,1181171N, R74W
lrms
Stms
O632
RI
1
00,37
11.37017
-$A3435
151010001073 1011. BI OCK I. ORI/,R DAKf7 (STATE
! 1/7115 II71N T?74W
_lane
brr
0469
OI
1
0469
11.-7011
_$61910
Popo 5
'MEADOW OAK TRUNK STORM SEWER EXTENSION'
ALTERNATE 'B'
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT NO.
CITY OF MONTICELLO. MINNESOTA
OSM PROJECT NO. 1748.93
Popo 6
ASSli5f0
AEA
ASS
'ARCEl 1D
iCION. TOWNS/i:PB
AREA
ASSt SSMLNi
fCKhYA1f Ni1PA
TLPEA
ASSESSMENt
'+47 :!PIR
r A8RR1 VIAiF9lFt:At tY SCtAPtK1N
S'lANrl
AtN1RF55
O'A-1rP
'Arnw1
)OMfI:
PAT"
APA
A!A
AMOUNT
115O7O-WIIW LOT B. BLOG1_BRIAR_OAKFS E SIASE
5IN, S18117IN R?AW
SrW
�$_Tno
0548
RI
i
_0518) 51,31017
_S7?]45
15507000117}0 tOIIOK 1,
,fILOCBIA OAKESfStAll
_ _
S1f7_S18.It2lNR74w
_ - _.-
$mo
S,-
07J9rt
01
i
33'
P O Bos 7486.$1 Ck-1
T0779[S1,3A)i7
_[ -_-
_51M
'15507O1](11Wp 1O11_BIOCK!.13P%M1OAKfSESIAif
_
51/7.Si8111tN. HAW �-
MN 56301_7!86
.Pony.1 &4Kias of Si Ctaxt
- -
,_0368
R.1 _
1 _'
0368 11.3:017
548587
1
ID45 N lt,, ro PkMCo
_
il_55O7O(101070 LOT 9. BLOCK I. BRIAR OAKES ESINE�_
- -
_ S I/7. SIB 1121N, R74W
_ _ _ _ _
__ MtnttuU. MN 55367 _
mnM M 8fmu t. SYuntxt
_ -
_01.`1)
R i
- _
i _
_ 01:61 51.37017
$4670'+
NW,McnikoCq. M71
- _
.
1510!0001110 lOi 11. NOCK I. PfAM OAhES [STATE
- -,PO
S I/7. 118, 1171&, R1dW
55361
Wa1mo V HIk)irt:K1 AWYarv_
p3S7
R i
_ 1_
0357 $1.1A117
Si6170:
Bo.?Ul6SI Ck-d
_
_
15507O170?010 IOI I, BLOCK 7, BRIM OA_KE5131AIE
SI/1. 518. 1171 N. R74W
MN5630"7486
C65of S1 CYud
0559
0.1
1
05'47117.3'7017
_3!37961
IS6O)OOY.'070 LOI 7: NOCK 7,.13IAAROAMS WAR
SI/2;51811?1N.R74W
S1-
SlYro
0175
R1
1
_ 04751_51.3w 17
$627 (A
,
IISS01<11K77W0_ 1013 BIOCK 7 81AAROAKFS FS1AR
S 117. SIQ I171N. R74_W_
Sr
Sm.
0154
0 1
1
I
0454! 31,3201)
SSW 30
15601DUTg0 1015 BLOCK 7. BRIMOAKIS fS1Al{
5117, 5181171N. R74W
_5-
Srro
OTO]
RI
I
_
�0741fF$1.37017
_
_197808
155070 O7AY0 IOt6.1UOCK 7, MA0 OAKI S I S1AIE
5_1/15181171NR7lW
_Steno TSmo
__o"
RIS
_� T�p
6m!$ 1'7011
SAO? 61
iW0)DN'J070 tOt 7,NOCK?. Of7iM OAK{'Si51At{
51/7, 518 I121N 074W
Srro
S-
0407
RI
1
1_040? S1.320 I?
$1.1071
1!49!0 002W 1018_&W.. 7, 61"1 OAKI S EST Alt
3 417, 318, 1171 N,_R74W
StAro _ -
$Mnu A_ _ _-
0295
_ 9).1
1 _
0 265 _51.370 1?
_ P/6751
It5S97O0D?iEt}_tOt_IQ O' OCK 7, BRIM OAKES f STATEy_
S1J1, SIB. 1171 N. 01AW
Sm9 _Sr
..._..__.___.
_0781_0•IT
1
0781 $1,31017
$31097:
1560J0O0?170 tO112.&OC97_BRtMOAKTSt STAit
5117.SI8. 117IN 024W
_Slro
S'Kna _
I418
0.1
I
144! 11,37017
11,01161
1!5970"110 1O1 13 &OCK ZMAR OJ 011 iAt;
S ili_SI8. 1111N, R74W_
31-
Srnw
_0496
Q.1
li
11,17011
_65181 1
I56010110?IOCT OV 16. NOCK?, MIM OAKFS ESTATE
517?, S181171N.R74W_
5, r
S-
_
0770
_
rt0-1
_
1
-'04964
_0710!$1,370 It
_$35645
ISSO/C70O7170 IOI17,-NOCk1.0rnMOAKISIStAT{_
. _ __ _ _
5177, S I8. It 71N. Q74W
_ _
S.-
Sven y_�_
-
,_�0?u,
0-i-
1-`
_0?u 51,110 i7
1377 i?
9391krYN9 w lO1M Sa1tKA
15S07E1E17JB40_IOI 4 NOCK?.ORIA71OAKCSIS7AII
31/ 7, 31_8. t 171N. R74W
MN SNJ7_
17KS0O 4P-C-IC<abcn
04y
111
1
$6/156(
- 7575 NKr o 7 BNa .
_0461_51,17017
I W11I
O77IRV 101.9, BLOCK 7, BRIM OAKES f SIAI{
51!7,518 1121N. R74W
M-qc.o. MN 55367
h.WsR e0. -L Ax-.tK
0.1
t
030111,31011
$397371
3,.^ f*Afl.Oa IAN'
__9:01
1
_.
155010O107110_ LOT II, NOCK ?. BRIMOAKI S151AIF
__. 31/'7_SIS.II?IN 074W
,55367 _ _ ,BAA"4R
B AMI..Rrx41{,prvw.p_
0781_
9)1
1_
___0781(11,31017,_-317
091
Popo 6
'MEADOW OAK TRUNK STORM SEWER EXTENSIOM
ALTERNATE'S'
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT NO.
CITY OF MONTICELLO. MINNESOTA
OSM PROJECT NO. 1748.97
155604 IXC OUTIOILWADOw OAK 5172318. 1171N R74W StKm Sme 30n RFM 17 380 607011 {4.75767
156(1430)IY71 OUILOIM WADONOAK SI/2. 518. I171N, R74W 5- Ym10 0810 aKID 17 09771513'/017 {1.787711
PtEgn ly mh4W W Cry 0n f5 nolfn of 1
NA C-tv1-175 5181121 N. R74W NA "flcifbw
/oO1/7 73649 UNIOl4D 1 73 6`19 11.77017 IJ1,72078
POpo7
ASSESSED
ARTAASSTSSFDPARCEL
ID,
S[CTION. IOWNS141P B
AREA
JASSISSIA1.1
LWNALENI(RALE PER
--NI
NUMNIa A99W%MATI D 1 MAL OFSCMFITION
RANG[
ADDRESS
OWMR
(Ac-)
7011':
RATIOS
ARIA AEA
AMOUNT
,%Jath 1AC Ituao, MN
1550 70-007 1 40 LOT 14 BLOCK 7. BRIM OAKS S ESTATE
SI/7. SIB. 1171N P24W
55362
wckm O B Mary B SClmkli
0,427
RI
1
047? 51.J7V.17
5557111
P O 80. 7480. St Cloud
I
ISS-07DO07150 LOT 15, BLOCK 7. BIT" CAKES ESTATE
S 1/2. SIB 11711, R74W
MN 56307 7480
Aoltlyo Bladon of Sl. Cbuo
04501
9.1
I
O a'_A S 1.320 17
559406
7161 661h Sh-1 N W.
1
11 1
155061D=10 Ouful A SANORI RG f ASI
N 112, 516. 11211 R74W
Mm; Lato MN 5:,156_Rodr
• E S K- D Nud
17.571 i
01
1
17 5741 SUM 17
$23 14197 1
155061 0=70 LOT 7. BLOCK 1. SANDO[RG EAST
N TO. SIB, 112IN, R74W
Sara
%-
0 500
R l
1
0 bW S 1.320 1 /
SWN' I
155061-007060 LOT 6. BLOCK 2. SANDBERG EASY
N 117. SIB, 1I7114 R74W_
Sacro
Sona
_ O [001
R 1
1
050. -51,320 17
_ b60 I,
15, 0 14002M LOT 9, BLOCK 7, SAM UPG FAST
N 1/7. 518, 1171N, P24W
S.-
Ymo
50111
R 1
1
O SRC $1,770 17
56n0 Wj
_0
I
I
155061-U071W 10110 BLOCK 7. SANDMDG1731
N I R. SI e. 1171 N_R24W
San
Brma
OSWi
RI
1
050011
51,37017
I
S[KO W;,
_
155GKIL-C 7110 IOT II. BLOCK 7_SANOBIDC FAST
NI/7. SIB, T12IN, R74W
51-
SSKI
0500
RI
1
05001
31_32017__SroO09
155MIO01170 10112 BLOCK 2_SANOBf RG[ASI
IN 177. 316. 1171N R74W
9.ino
S-
0511,
R-1
1
050; 31.77017
5660W
155061{fp2130 10111 Bt (?CK 7, SANDBL RG I ASI
, N 1/7, S I B, 1121 N 274'W
5-
4mo
0500
PI
1
0,:w SIXEIII
_b60W
155061-0tll01U L OI I, BLOCK 3_SANON RG I ASI
N172.SIB,1171N R741k
Smp
YYno
05011
R.1
1
050) 11_37017
b60W
ISSMI-001AJ0_t017. BLOCK J SANOBI IK I AST
NI/7_Sig QIN R24W
- - -
,San
Snn
0500
RI
1
_05W SI_J:017
_ $660W
-- - - - - -
-
713 Mtml,40 Dwo,
I S.DM1lD7140 101 I4 BLOCK 7_SANOia RG IA51
NI/7. SIB 11711 a74W_1N4ntICot»MN
-
55.167
NCfaG BBnrtKm 119111Ka_
- -
051
-
R1
I
0563 31,17017
_ 174376
-
sand 1m xLw �11KIor
15504340(SLTO) DUII OI C, 120 AI7OW oAK
_ 3 1/2. S 18 112 IN 1?24W
_Io- P_",th, MN 5841
Mall- M
7 SIO
adilD
1 7
e" SUM 17
$11.678 W,
1510434(n 3620 OIRLOI D. k1fADOWOAI,
SI/7_61&1171N.374W_Sm0
Smo
aAW
REVD
1710670
31.3701/
{14070241
NA OUROILKO ADOW OAK
SI/7. 7181121N, R74W_5on10
5ma
_ 0580
_R 0.A
17
_11496 11.37017
_ -
115 176 71
-
- -
Ik
C/o lorlh L11 S9 ft
-
315 rr3-I snmf. SI
16SO430011100 OLMOIJ M[ADDINOAK
SI/7. B16, 112IN R74W
PUA MN 55101.16:0
fmn1 CMI Mfr4of Sl 0..4
4b0
00.K)
I7
6737 11,77017
bW115
155604 IXC OUTIOILWADOw OAK 5172318. 1171N R74W StKm Sme 30n RFM 17 380 607011 {4.75767
156(1430)IY71 OUILOIM WADONOAK SI/2. 518. I171N, R74W 5- Ym10 0810 aKID 17 09771513'/017 {1.787711
PtEgn ly mh4W W Cry 0n f5 nolfn of 1
NA C-tv1-175 5181121 N. R74W NA "flcifbw
/oO1/7 73649 UNIOl4D 1 73 6`19 11.77017 IJ1,72078
POpo7
NON•ASSISSASLI PROSSPTIFS
'MEADOW OAK TRUNK STORM SEWER EXIENSION'
P,0 Bus 1147. MPnBCueo.
ALTERNATE 'B'
5CaD10 OUILOIAMFA)OWOAKfSTATF
IS0u
15177, V. 1121.. -.WMN_55367 C_yl of Manl,[Yb
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
EaCary71
_F¢aryN _1
IM Cj"(RSD70 IXfT1011._MfA_DOW' OAK f_5_lAIT
----Clh
PROJECT NO.
11,740{.canal
_(scarp,
CITY OF MONTICELLO. MINNESOTA
518, 1121N. R74W 5o Smn
l
31 pig
OSM PROJECT NO. 1746.99
E.cornPl__
fOIAI MOM•AS,ISSMl11P0►IRRI!
1
I
45480
I.—pt
Fwwrpt
AAREASSESSED
ARIA
IfourvNEN7IRATEPEP
.
j'1-11.R'Ft0-
I
19ANC.F
fAU I
I
ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENII
7251117
ABIWf VIAIFD IFGAI EKSCPII>!K)N
ADORFSS
OWNfR
(Acres) IOMNC.
RATK)5 (AREA AFA AMOUN7
AYW^Y wi o, Clh WrVil 1ou,n ol-
I
I IOM C1AWK]ATION NA A A1.4 SSMI NI
PATIO
_ __.� RAII.001N
NA
71
cwnh rwU75 ---
IB. II?IN R?4w
-- --
NA Srnw
]e eao UNIONFD
1 JO N)DI $1.320,11 S5I.771771
I ♦.fVcm,acmtnn, cnmvrmf
MINGION NOR714RN RAILROAD RIGNI-
jS
BurPV1P^NUMwr^
- --
RI ' 1041mLLt RuilllYntkl
I,O
INA
Or,wAY
I SIB.TI?IN P24W
NA 7ronsTl-rwInCOn
2701 UWONED
11?%1
$1.370,11 $],031,1711
I...wMN•.113ASL5:
_�
l 51.]7017 -
I IIntplllaff3
Talc/Coal.
$75.76TD 00
17
H1011way No. 94
N 1/2. SI8. 1111N, R?4W
%.--
16303 U712ONLD
1 163001
51.370 $71.518671111
Bout
_
_R PwI7u_aklonlbl PIarY,oa U'tl1 DowK,}lnwnt
1.2_
----- -A .
179 567
192 096,
$1.370 1 7 sw eco m'
A17I SSAeI!
IAIO.f ImO
1,7
•
NON•ASSISSASLI PROSSPTIFS
P,0 Bus 1147. MPnBCueo.
5CaD10 OUILOIAMFA)OWOAKfSTATF
IS0u
15177, V. 1121.. -.WMN_55367 C_yl of Manl,[Yb
?0'A)
EaCary71
_F¢aryN _1
IM Cj"(RSD70 IXfT1011._MfA_DOW' OAK f_5_lAIT
----Clh
51/7. S IQ 1171N, P24W Sarno Sarno
11,740{.canal
_(scarp,
Mvn,ofwm
518, 1121N. R74W 5o Smn
l
31 pig
E¢omp,
E.cornPl__
fOIAI MOM•AS,ISSMl11P0►IRRI!
1
I
45480
I.—pt
Fwwrpt
Ii
fAU I
I
7251117
1 Yl 0(11T
I
IAUISN4EN1 QAII SCNIDUEI:
I I I
I IRAII IOUAnON: I
I
I IOM C1AWK]ATION NA A A1.4 SSMI NI
PATIO
_ __.� RAII.001N
—
0
06
I ♦.fVcm,acmtnn, cnmvrmf
- --
RI ' 1041mLLt RuilllYntkl
I,O
� NA. AUOItW E<AAtNnl
Sryb e 7 {brWy ROYAYn,kS
1.0
_P7
R] AMSUa1n D.WvROLtWntlul
1.7
Talc/Coal.
$75.76TD 00
____
R4 Mc4I. I*— fkr k
1.7
%.--
_
_R PwI7u_aklonlbl PIarY,oa U'tl1 DowK,}lnwnt
1.2_
----- -A .
107 096
. — — --- -
PlR Ibllf)nIR,CO luno: RW lYniko
1,7
--
PI M fWIMrKSK.P IM,R • Mb -d
1.7
RATE .
11.370 17
I
fwv.grR
IA9TNFVIATFDLEGAI DFSCRIPTION
I BI:
NaprOod o &,y ss
12.1
1 02:
Ul .d B"A—
12.1
I 831
roM m Bu —
12.1
'2.1
I u
RORbnaam..
I Ic:
kr— C—M4
1.9
I u:
Igmr+anuw
2.1
1 P:
waw Inanrnd
12.1
1 scr»al, Able scnoa
11.4
'MEADOW OAK TRUNK $[ORM SEWER EXTENSION'
ALTERNATE 'B'
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT NO.
CfTY OF MONTICELLO. MINNESOTA
OSM PROJECT NO. 1148.93
SECDON. TOWNSHIP S
RANrF ADDRFSS ONNFR
Pogo 9
ASSESSED MEA "' ASSESSED
JAKA ASSESSNTENT QUIVALENT RATE P(R ASSESSMENT
IAC-) XWNQ PATIF:f, ATFA AFA AN"INT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_MSI ." � �'�'• � � j I _ -. _ -
•w;aY
---
;, t 14.4j1 w
�J
"int ., ^ V
moi;
ASSESSED
AREA
)rown By: Drawing Title Comm. No.
R.G.D. Ewen MEADOW OAK TRUNK 17ee.93
geron
Dote A9cate.•Ine. STORM SEWER EXTENSION Figure
SEPT.i,a Mew ;pf -;-'p"On ALTERNATE "D"
1991 NW-U= "'"''"" MONTICELLO. MINNESOTA C
. „. rt16t.w.r.
Popo 1
'MEADOW OAK TRUNK STORM SEWER EXTENSION'
ALTERNATE
PRELIMINARY ASSESSM ENT ROLL
Preliminary
IIuIna
PROJECT NO.
_
CITY OF MONTICELLO. MINNESOTA
OSM PROJECT NO. 1748.97
ASSISSlD
-A
ASSESSED
PAPCE110
SECTION, IOWNSNIPS
AREA
ASSESSMENT
EQUIVALENT IRATE
RR
ASST -NII
NUNPfR AR9RFVIA1TO11(.AI OISrPIPIK)N
?ANr4
ADDI1SS OWNER
(A-)
/ONINC.
PATIOS
ARIA
ATA
AMO(INI
Surto IW 30701btnr
1510"{117010 LOT I. BLOCK 7. Mf ADOW OAK ESTATE
51/7. 515. 1171N R74W
L= RMm Ln MN_;,Seal Um9 H - Kr:
0771
RRID
1,7
079711
SI.70A 07
70
__$YJ
1510" OWL) LOT 7. BLOCK 7. MEADOW OAK ESTATE
S12._510 117114, R74W SAME SAME
0255
0 PUD
1 7
0 706311_$
II 3 07
S476 SI ,
155044007!1)0 (OI I BIOCKJ MFADOW OAK ESI AIF
51/ 7. SIB. 1171N. R74W
.SANT SAME
07431,
RPUD
17_0792I
51,79_407,__540)'+7,
_
ILW"AC :OA 1014 BLOCK 3. MFADOWOAKFSIAIE
71.515, 1171 N, R74W
SAMF SAME
0717,
RPUD
1.7
03?e1jI
$1.30407
_S{Su 01�
155{114 C43Y0 LOT 6 BLOCK 3 MIADOW OAK (STATE
11 7. 515 7171 N, WAN _
SAME SANE
0 779
R PJD
12
0715
_51,70407
,_SANS 11
756E M -K CIA A-
-M50"00180- LOT 5 BLOCK 3, MIADOWOAK FSIAIF
S 112515,117114_R7AW
MlnWOI. MN 55707 Way-E.S B( .Jmo
0314
RRID_
1Z_
0 AlSS
$1,79407
7617 MKxt- 09K I-.
15503 C47010 L017,BIOC93_MI A()l7W OAK_I STATE
SI/7�SIB 117114 QZ4W
Mmlt W. MN 5510_iIMWK DS&rrYOK W_ab Ixl_
07A1
pRID
1.7
_07181
�1y70407,_$u330
2616 MA -T- O(ri Lang.
ISS OL (R3W1 I0I6BIOCK3, Mf ADO_WOAKESIAP
Sjj IB1171_NN R24W
MUIIK'Wu. MN SS]61 11Krn HSfb(a-hA Aa[m1
0754
PRID
I7
0475$1,34407,_5597_ISI
7565 Wnl9 09K CKc10-
155014(4701'0 LOT O, BLOCK 3 MI ADOWOAI( ESIAP
S�7_510, 1171N, R74W
Mm_Ik ob MN S_ 53_2 kp W.SOowny J W_(yl(r
_0453
R_RIO
17
05001 SI„19407
$50107
7550%"I0 Oa CA[b.
IS50" 0111 E0 101 10 WOCK 7 M_f ADOW OAK ESI ALL
15_1121 18y1171N, 974W
Mmrcu10 MN_1u367 51-J 5 Sr rlmk+ n
___0452
_p ND_
_I.7
_ 0547. 31.39407
_5IM I I
7007 V-- 016 1,-.
1_u 044 (q] IL 10111, BLOCK J MI AIkYW OAK FSIAI!
_$I/T,SIBi171N_pNW_Mt_n1K:4A_M_N
5:.367 BnCOA AJobK+InM 8--vOJ60
RRID
17
047? $1,79407
$1471771
1550"007170_ IOT17A3 MEADOW OAK LSIAI!_
51J7515i17114,074W
Mm1KOB9. MN 55367 Wt -Q AI VM Nmc_y VUO
0714
RRJD
17
_ _010C- - -- _
-IPO
Ib. TOSS -76(17 - _
_
-
_,._03771_►1_39407
_35757/'
Mu(xTow Ori 1,-,
(I5 (VI31)D 10117 BLOCK MI ADOW OAK E STATE
i 1/7.$16, 1171N, 974W
M(rIri'9Ib. MN 55367 Kov Q SLooK T, -V
0701
RRJD
1.7
035E 51,39407
$49051
2601 Mo+K19r 01,11
1550"(11)140 LOT 14 BLOCK 3. ME ADOW OAK E STATE
31/7.$151171N P74W
MUnitoll, MN fil307 wVk-j 6A41n lou{CI
0747
IT RID
I7
0357
51.30407
SIW 11
sono ILK) 7(331 N(vtln
1550"(13010 101 I, BLOCK 4, MI ADOW OAK E STATE
SI/7. EIA. 1171N. R74W
Irrn, PII-th MN 55641 Un91KKro1,K
0348
RPl/D
17
0415
51,39407
VA7141
ISSO"(1'AM LOT 2. NOCK A, MI ADOW OAK FSIAIF
51/7. SIA. 1171N P74W
-k- 5+1ro
0717
ITFUD
1.7
03791$1.39407
14'A (A
If- 04(TWOO LOT 3 BLOCK 4. Mf AOOW OAK FSTAIE
91/7. S IB. 1171 N. P74W
Bono Snrtr
0793
RRID
17
0357111,39407
540.)141
I MOM(D4EEN0 I Of 5 Al OCK 4, MEADOW OAK FSTATE
51/7. 118, TI?IN 074W
Sim. 1(m
0471
RRI.)
17
050511179407
1113761
151044 OXXI 1016 BLOCK 4. MI ADOW OAK I SLAP
S 1/7.115.1171N. 974W
V- Srnr
0A50
RLAID
17
0516
11,30407
IA0795
1550"CI(MM LOT/. BI OCK 4, MI ADOW OAA F STATE
31/7,1151121N 074W
Yrno Selo
0451
R -PUD
17
0541
$1.39407
6164
Popo 1
IMEADOW OAK TRUNK STORM SEWER EXTENSION'
ALTERNATELY
PRELMWY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT NO.
CITY OF MONTICELLO, WOOL -OTA
OSM PROJECT NO. 1748.93
Pogo 2
ASSESSED
1 AREA
55E0
�--L-
YCIK7N.IOYVN51m&
I9ANC.F
AREA
ASSESSMEM EOUNMEM RA
A90fFVLATFO1FCAl OFSCRIVTION
�
C 4
t2= W11AWG
OATS�9
ARIA
Af
115594004010 LOT & BLOCK 4. MEADOW OAK ESTATE
S 172 SI& 11211 R24W
Sane
9nte
0 W %
RAND
1.2
06411 $1,39402
570165
2;10 MooOor Oh L-
IT.. LOT A BLOCK 11 MEADOW OAK FSIATE
S 1/7. S 1.11171 N 024W
MMIlcab MN 551;7
.&adv/FLC)MI1Ka A.FT1k
0.30E
944F7
1.2
031k, 71.39402
551071 i
12006 MaadoW Oak Lora.
0154
f1.3902
$1.19105
56044Jmdm LOT O, BLOCK L MEADOW OAK ESTATE
S 132 SI., I121N WAIN
~w,, MN AA1;7
RO0ot1 J. L Anita K. Ge.a
0.712'
RAND1.7
1-155,04AM4100LOT IO BLOCK L MEADOW OAK [STATE
S I/2 SIL 11211 R24W
764MomCkdO.
IWtnl .M. kY4 6511
Gay D.. Dkim E. A-0,315,
Rita
1.2
0450
11.39 OJ
5;77.31
7.2 -
1550Ym4110 L0111, BLOCK L ME
EADOW CAA
IF
51723161 11711. 02AW
b--.
M-11ca. MN SSW
OMIR WOIbn
g
0;7-
R4WD
1.2
0.06
$1.39402
II.17K 1�
155044004120 LOT 12 BLOCK L MEADOW OAK ESTATE
S11NL024W
7.0 Atom Cade.
Monec".. MN SSW
MchuW R Robcx= J. Bock
0.00
_R -P10
1.21070
11.39 02
11.503.7
I15SOYm4110
770 Acorn C"c"'
0514
$1,134171
LOT IS BLOCK, MEADOW OAK FSIATE
S 112 SILL It 211024W
V-tico6 MN 653;7
F. Gw L _
067..
RAA
1.7
11,3902
IISSOYm4140
26M MOok L
kOdaty
0411
RAD
1.2
040311.39
Y!
1017.53
101 IL BLOCK L MEADOW OAK ESTATE
!1/7.110.11711 R71W
Mon ta4o MN 65b7ao
Jaana M.aekr
LOT 1. BLOCK I, MEADOW OAK 2nd
2641 Rea Oft loo.
0 B3
11,3M 02
17410;
I56015m1010 ADOIT101
1172 S1611711 P24W
Monticab kek 15162
TLIt 1, L BoPoao A Swch
0,44
R4-tM
1.2
LOT I, BLOCK 7. MEADOW OAK 7M
2.61 Rao Oat C/co
0 365 11.394.07
fbl7 do
155045007010 ADOIIION
S 1/2 .1611211, R24W
Mon.ca m MN 65367
MchM 0.6 9k L Hata
0 307
RAD
1.7
LOT 2 BLOCK 2 MEADOW OAK Ind
P.O. Bo. 1100 Mo tft
079 11.39W 02
IDD.,
16SO45m'JWO ADDITION
S 172 516 71211E P24W
144N6-167
Dad H Fw
L245
RAD
1.2
LOT I BLOCK 1 MEADOW OAK 7M
115504SODZO7D
2905 Rad Oak Cl7d,
1,2
037311,3902
1449.09
AOWK)N
31/7. SI&11211 R24W
MorftlO MN 66162
A KAnt
0700
RAN
LOT L BLOCK 2 MEADOW OAK 7M
2400 Red Oak CkkOa.
1.2
0311
11,39 D2
w376
165-046007010ADDITION
11 516 TOM R24W
MontCM0.MN 66362
Lkb 2.?P �
0.760
RAD
LOT & BLOCK 2 M[ADOW OAK 2M
7650 Rod ONrc14,
0k C65367
029011,39407
14166]
7010
116604600ADDITION
5 1 R2
1/2 516 11214W
MmtlekMq MN
RaladM DAo-
It tag
RAD
1.2
LOT; BLOCK 2 MEADOW OAK 2W
1185045007060
1010MOo0oln Oat 13*r
1,7
0 390
11,304 W
5543 67
ADDITION
! 172 $16 71711 R24W
M..ft MN 663;2
Mak W. L l A Im
0 376
RAND
LOT 7. BLOCK 2 MEADOW ,OAK 7M
920 VA d- Oak DING
O S
{51613
1160I500JOA ADDIIKON
5 172 516 11211 WAIN
Mmt19a1n MN 66167
SKtkAtn M a O 4ria plw"
030.
04tUD
1.7
11,39,07
LOT L BLOCK 1 MEADOW OAK 7M
11660,1007010
I
?Ila 100 3030 H.9-
R41UD
1.7
0,332
11.3902
546337
ADOIIK>/i
51/251& T121K 02AW
Lay. PV14111h. 4AN 66Y I Lima 14m M.
0717
LOT 9. BLOCK 2 MEADOW OAK fid
IISSOL100J0E0
045 Maao9w Od1 OrNk
0300
{1.39.07
NIL2o
ADDITION
1t/2IIL11711 R2 AW
MaKt4kk MN 6531
P.MckM IA9Co.
0200
RAD
1,2
LOT ITI BLOCK 2 MEADOW OAK 2M
11
950 MOadow 06 D'1M.
0736
RA1D
1.7
0.717
11,39.07
193 11
WOI600710D ADDITION
1172 510. 71211 R24W
Mon6cela MN 6967
Scdl P. L I. Faklnon
LOT 11. BLOCK 2 MEADOW OAK 7M
11610/Sm7110
I= k411o0Rka Dai 0111
-LO
0304
11.39,07
{4377
ADDITION
!I1I1611I11 R74WR74W
Mamcab, MN 653;2
TScMOAKk+kaka
0753
04
1,7
Pogo 2
'MEADOW UAK 117UNK STORM SEWW EXTENSION*
ALTERNATE 'D'
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT NO.
CITY OF MONTICELLO. MINNESOTA
OSM PROJECT NO. 1748.93
Popo 3
ASSESSED
NRA
ASSES ED
PARCEL O.
YCIK7N,IOWNSN:PA
AREA
ASSCSSMINI
COUIVAINI
IVAIC RR
--ENE
140MDFR
AITFIX IAIID IE( -AI DI SC.TION
Pwll
ADDRESS
OWNER
/Acrasl
TONING
QATOS
APA
ACA
4Y+ TINT 11
101 I, BLOCK 3, MI AOO'W OAK 2-
2840 RW 0l /tna,
15500500)010 ADDITION
51/7. S18.11 21 N. Q74W
-- -
MmIICoM. MN 55Y7
MUto91 A S-Jdf A P 7--.
0750
9RJO
12
0301 S1.3940?
Sd?B?4
LOT 7. (MOCK 1 MI ADCIW OAK 2nd
90b Moc> , Ou Dnvo.-
155045003070 ADDITION
S I/7, $10 T121N P24W
M_mllrnb, MN ;4,.162
fl, 9IItyJ OMYCM
0735
APUD
l,2
0287 $1,39007
S3v] 11
LOT 3 BLOCK 3. MEADOW OAK 2-
DMo, MonticO . MN-
- - -
-
155-001003030 ADDII_KDN
S1/7. 510. 1171N. 1?7410
55307
WrKwfWMu#%A It l A Jov1f
--
0250
QPUD
12
0305 51,39002
-- __-_ _
$420101
,_ _
LOT 4 STOCK 3, MEADOW OAK 210
on
975 Ma -OA DR.,
1510050010,10 ADOMON
SI/7. SIB 1171N. 074W
M-Ilol, MN 55307
Inman W. A Amo P. Inoriy
0756
_R RA
-
12
0307 SI_39407.__$42820
---
1011, MOCK MEADOW OAK 210
IDS$ Mat. -(K. C-
155 045II74010 ADDIIION
SI/2.518. 112IN, R74W
M -11 -Ila. _MN_ 55307
1Pwy 1. DOC-
0 792
R PUD
1.2
0 SI4 51.190 07
54,08 40 �
701 6 (LOCK 4 MEADOW OAK 2M
7101 OM- Taro,
155045OD'Im NDOIIKDN
S 1/2,3181121N, P24W
MmIK.o_b, IVIN_"7
TV-MyS AJw QlJ 0(Mw
0207
IT PUD
- -
1.2
0747 $1,39402
-
5357911
1019, BLOCK 4 MEADOW OAK 2W
7741 Cn -. I-.
15SO41mIW0 Ar"DON
_5 177. SIG 1171 N. 17240"
IMmtlCaOo. K Nq_ 10" 7
_ KH A 1*017KY
0.'04
R WO_
1 7
024.5_ j1239402_
_ 5341 2011
IOL 10 IQ OC. 4, ML ADOW OAK 210
2121 OaK9lot. lar..
1550450M 100 ADDITION _
SI/7. 5181171 N. %4W
- - -
MMIICOM. MN 55,162
XYna l IS lwn M RWICMM1
0193
ARID
17
0737 31,39407_$372851
LOT 1. (MOCK G MEADOW OAT( fid
7747 OM- la.
155005010,070 NriN ON
51/24SIB I171N RT4W
M_m1k;oRi, M_N ,"4,_,107
Na B Kiev
OIBO
RIVD
12
0_7_23 S1_)9001
7711 14
1010 BIOCKO MEADOWOAK 710
27770n -Lar.
156045(xww N)UOION
51/2.518. 1171 N, R74W
MmIlclo MN %&M7
EkM A A"N K Sc.'h-7
OISG
RR1D
--
1.7
0770 71,)9407_{31449
LOT 1, DLOCX I, W ADOW OAK Ya
2091 RW OaK ItYn
- _
_
155(57(01010 ADDIIKDN
91/7. SIG I)?IN, R14W
-_
MmIK:o1b, MN 5530]_7010
I. ASM. -M B9b l_
0499
RPUD
12
0M 71,]9407
_5151/4 it
LOT 2. BIOCK I. ME ADOW OAK 3rd
1701 Rod Oal I-
1550"1 I)IOM ADDITION
S I/7. 51G 1121N_024w
- - -
IMmIIColIa. MN 55307
WPYmF QrtKw
0311
REVD
I T
-
_ 0313 $1.394 07
_S.,X 25 i
1013 BIOCK 1. MEADOW OAK 3ld
7771 Rat? OCY Lon
- -
-
IM_151001010 A)nITK]N
SI/7_SIA.II71 N, QU%
_ -
AMtnIK-nSa, MN 55]07
Ik"A 910T4x-I
0770
RID
1?_
O3]1 $1,)9407
-
5441101
101 4 BI OCK 1. ME ADOW OAK 310
-.0. U.) YLVI I4 l
-
-
1
151M'.001040 ADIDIVON
S I/7_SI8_I121N_R70W
Taro !!I- I1 MN 51041 LflVa14nro09. _
IT 2
RR1D _
_ _11__
_ _033A 313940?
$411 14
1016 BLOCK 2. MI ADOW OAK Yd
155 05, 002W
_ 5/002W ADDITION
S I/7, 518 1171N R74W
Sano
-
Sano
O 32
RRA)
1 7
03VS 51.394 D2
_ _
$:w38.
101/,BLOCK?. MCADOWOAK310
1 510 5 1 0 07 010 ACKNION ___ ___
51/7.SIG1171N 1124W
Sora
YYno _
_ 0203
RPUD
17
0316 71,39407
$439951
LOT A BOCK 2. MEADOW OAK 310
AEANIION
91/1. f1f 117M 1174W
An.
0703
RPUD
17
11,)9002
$43995
115105/071000 _
101 5 (MOCK 1. M[ADOW OAK 31d__
_StYro
7701 PWO4, lo..
-
_0310
_
•-_ 1
I!ilm/0010',0 NIDIIION_
51/7, $If 1171N R74W
- _ - -7161
MmII[ati, MN 55:70?
Ib'4tYd C_KncllA BraKb",K.
070,0
REVD
17
0327 11,79407
IYA 37
1010 BLOCK I. MEADOWOA93r0
Roo Olt la.
1 51 01 /011010 A1XVION --
51/7. Sig T171N 02AW
-
AAwtrlc:oeo, MN 55307
ANO AIwroJ Gfbl.
0717
RRA
12
03M $1,39402
147114
101 1, BLOCK 1, MEADOW OAK 310
7101 Raz 01* lmo.
1550"7001070 ADMgN
!1/?. f1G 1121N R74W
WYt110a0a, MN 55307_CnaIbON
6DA8KM Il.n
07,Y1
_RRA
11
0470 _11.)0007___(58549
Popo 3
PARCEL 0
rNUM,RFR IARRI7IVIATFOIFCAt FXSC(?IPIK)N
101 I, BLOCK 1. MEADOW OAA 310
I;S 057-00'1010 ADDITKX7
LOT ? BLOCK ? MEADOW OAK 3ra
155011-1010'.0 ADDITION
1013. BI OCK 7. MEADOW OAK 31a
155Q97007030 ADDITION
LOT 4 BLOCK 1. MEADOW OAK NU
15,?05"W2W ADDIIION
LOT 1 BLOCK 7. MEADOW OAK Ira
�ISS0570070'0 _ADDOgN
LOT I. BLOCK I. MEADOW OAK 4m
IS10591M1010 AD01100N
101 7. BLOCK 1, MI ADOW OAK 4m
II5S05911D1070 ADDITION
L01 3 /HOCK I, Mf ADOW OAK 4m
155059001030 ADDITON
LOI 4 BLOCK E MEADOW OAK 4m
ISSO'4m1040 ADLXIK)N
LOT 5 BLOCK I. MEADOW OAK 401
151059 (D10!'.O ADDRION __
LOI 6 BLOCK I. Mf ADOW OAK 4m
151OWTLL01(W AOUIIIUN
101 7, NOCK 1. MI ADOW OAK 4m
151059001070 ADDOgN _
-f LOT B BLOCK I. MEADOW OAK 4m
156069001(ITo AWOgN
101 1. BLOCK 7. MEADOW (LAK 4m
1554'900410_ ADORION
101 7. BLOCK 7. MI ADOW OAX 4m
1510'4001070_ ADDITION
-_ - LOT 3 BLOCK 7. Mf ADOW OAK 4m
153059007010
LOT A BLOCK 7. MEADOW OAN Am
15SIXR 002
010 AD00gH
LCI 10 BLOCK 2 MEADOW OAK 4111
1560:,9001110 ADOf1_gN
10117. BLOCK 7. MEADLYW OAK 4111
I SS 059 007170 ADDITION --
LOT 1ITT. OCK 3. MEADOW OAT( AM
155059001010 q_( EK N
WEADOW OAK TRUNK STORM SEWER EXTENSION'
ALTERNATE V
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT NO.
CITY OF MONTICELLO. MINNESOTA
OSM PROJECT NO. 1748.93
Popo 4
ASSESSED
AREA
�ASSISSFD
I7AN6:F
AREA
ASSE".SMIN110UIVNENI
RAIEKR ASSESSMENT
FCIgN.IOWN5111P8
ADOf7E'SS
OWNER
(Acrm)
70NING
RATIOS
AIXA AEA AMOUNT
7/W Rud Oa Lara.
t-vW Sci t76 MG
SI/1. SIB, IITIN, 11I4W
11911eaO, MN 55361
AYT
07081
ITPUD
1.7
0346. $1.39407
S48117
7470 Rod Om Land.
5 1 /?. S 18. 1121N. R74 W
Mmncolb. MN 55362
Dago R. 8 No -V A Obm
0 7551
0 PLITT
1.7
0 300 $1.39402:
S476 S7
M.Ao-KT CKclu.
51/7. SIB, 11711,, 074W
MrnOmaIKI MN SSb7
I&-iPn
0754'
RPUE)
17
0311 $1.3940?
$433761
7145 MaT7Ia1K99a CVCT*.
S 1/2. 518.112IN, R74W
16mW.t_"MN 55367
�10ry ,'%WhQWP LCXJ rv_
0389'
RPUD
1.2
04611 51.39407
_Wo 731
1147 Mrpl -j CKcb
51/7. SIB. TITIN R74W
- _
M_m_ticoW, MN 55367
DaKYmK EccW
031.1
RPUD
17
0377._$1.39407
557571;
_-
SWto 1003010141.bor
51/7. S 18. I IT I N. R74W
Imo, PIYn1cKAn MN SAM!
TO110n1o411c
OS]I
RPVD
I?
ow 51.39407
5888711
SI/7.518.1171N.R74W
3-
Sr<r14
0797
0P11D
1.7
0350 $1.39407
5468461
51/7. 518. 1171 N. 074W
Smo
S,-
0189•
P -PUD
1.7
0777 $1.39407
5316 16JI
51/7.518.I171N. R74W
,S-
S-
0175
_PPIACL
1,7
0710 51.39402
_5797141
q. 518. 1171N. P74W
Sime
SnT10
0181
RPUO
17
0717 $1.39407
3307/8
SI/7.S181171N_P24W
,Sono
S>rrlo
0197
R_PUD
1.2
_0730 Sla3940
$311.18
517?, SI8. 11?IH. R14W
Sano
Sarre
0706
RPUD_
17
0747 $1.3940
_S34460
51/7.518, 11?IN.R24W
S>rro
5.
0736
_R PUD_
_ 110783.51.3940
5394/41
91/7_518. II TI N. A74W
51-
Sero
0736
_R PUD_
_12
_ 0703 $1,3940 _
5394/u
51/7. S11, 1121N. R24W
91-
9-
0756_R_PW
___17
0301 51,39407
$41074
SI/2518.II71N.R74W_
Syne
,Sero
0795_
RPL)D
I?_
0354 _11,39407
$49348
S1/7.5181171N,RT4W
S-
9rn10
0748
_RPLq
1?_
0798 11_�am
_541406
SI/7.1181171N RT4W
91mo
3-
0117
RAI)
17
07H1_11.3940__M'T
S I12. 118. 112IN._R74W_ISmo
Srm
070.7
RAID
I7
_074. 11.3940
_133951
31/7_1181171N 2yw_Snrtr
See
0117
PAM
17
0760_11.39A0.__/.163W
Popo 4
'MEADOW OAK TRUNK STORM SEWER EXTENSION'
ALTERNATE V
PREUMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT NO.
CITY OF MONTICELLO.
MINNESOTA
OSM PROJECT NO.
1748.93
ASSESSED
AREA
ASSf:SYD
PMCEI ID I
Yc1K)N.IOwNSNwe
AREA
ASSESSMENIEOOIVAIW[AIEPER
A55(SSMENI
ON
'N1INBIR 1['VIOCK4 f:L DSWO KI'
� NSC
Af7IN�CSS
OWNER (Acrm)
`ONNG
RATIOS
IAWA AIA AMOIINI
101 1. pIOCK 4 MkAOOW UAK 4RI
LOT
RHIO
1 2
0484 51,39407
507415
ISS059-004010 ADDITION
S_ 1/1_518. 112IN R7Aw
S-
SYno
04,403
_
LOT 5 BLOCK 1. MI ADOW OAK AM
17101 m0000w lino.
5.111 d0;
I550.•Ad101Mo AJ)DII_ION
SI/7.SIB. T12IN P24W
IMonikolb. MN MM?
tLvP D_11 Ku17v 0aNub
0718
RWD
147
027AI$1.39402_
1016 BLOCK 7. MEADOW OAK ARI
PO go. 1036 McMIw. o6.
141 31,]94 01
S791 76
1 Y51kAdD?OGO ADDITION
5 1 /1. SIB. 1121 N. R24 W
MN SS ?
Gb G G-uY
0 178
R PUD
--'
I.T
0 a - - _
1017, BLOCK 7. MEADOW OAK 411,
7/41 M-Iwi-
22 751.39407
$31616
1550l9_0MIC) ADDITION
S 1/2.918.1121N R24W
--
iMonikulb, MN 55367
aIMJ Rrdl=
M')r1F OPb
0 189
RWO
1,2
0 _
- - JOE B BLOCK 7 MEADOW OAK AM
155450007080 ADD11K)N
SI/7. SIB, TITIN, R24W
- - --
7761 Mo .lan.
M,nikulb. MN 55367
DI lD AIn^K Al! Tna11
0191
RKID I
11
013E 31,39402
---- -
$329!4,
1019. BLOCK 7. ME ADOW OAK AM
11151 MufYnw Lan,
PND
12
07,_51,394_07
30
972118{
151050007090 ADDITION
51/7_SIB.-1111N_RTAW
-
A4Knko%MN SSJ67
GruO C. 1uM1
0191
101 11, BLOCK 2 MEADOW OAK 411,
2621 M.. I,.-.
760, 11_]04 O?
5,W ED
151,059 or* 110 ADDITION
S I /1. SIB. 1121 N, R74W
M-Icoro. MN ; 5367
KIIA J. Kk--n Q
- -
0 117
R RTD
-
I 1
-1.
0
101 1, BLOCK 1. MEADOW DAN IT
71W Mucxk r law,
1.7
OJSt !1.]9401
3443481
155059 O0JD10 ADDIIKIN
51/7. 518. 1171 N. R74W
Montk olb._MN 55367
Pc" elorlA Mu_ __
0795
RWO
--
LOT 2. NOCK 3 MEADOW OAK AM
7720 Mono. Lan.
1;.51xA{0,1070 ADDITION
S 1 /7_510. 1111 N, 024W
M_u, Woflk), MN bt.M?
N4onr J e 9-a Cr-
0 745
-±-P-10
1.1
0: $1.39402
_ SAN 84
LO A 81 000 J MC ADOW OAK AM
A1o00o. lan,
_
51.79401
J7
1550'A (U]010 ADINIK)N
S 112_518, II21N R24W
17760
Minn:Wb_AW_ 55]61
BrKKI 1. Sivcyo11ARotbclKn_
017?
RRTD
17
0Tml
_ _
_SJ/1
- - 101 5, OLOCK 3 MI ADOW OAK Am
1180 MOAJuv law,
4 0
S I.J94 07
$771 37 1
ISSO501R10;0 ADDITION
15 1 /7.518, 1171N_RNw
--
IASonikoro. MN_tu.'101
Iwla -P& Ro1KK:to -V"-Y-
0 777
R RTD
PUD
17
O TD_6
_
lO1e B10CKJMf ADOWOAK4m._
151059{1].1(Y4 ADDITION
51/7. SIB, 1111N_R141
_ _ _ _
2803 Moo0o. lan.
Mlntkoro MN 5:367
RKmnD elboK Ro.ron_
_
0711
BRIO
-
11
0?SJ 51_39407 _
--_
37619AI
_ - 1011. BLOCK 3MI.W OAK IM
ISS WJ (117010 ADDITION'S
1
1/7. SI B, 1111 N_R74W
7870 Mu TK Lan,
M.M,uM. MN 5536.1
1ar7A W903eSD (1 -V"-
01231
_RRR)
I T_
0717 SI,39d07
_ SM6 A7
101 B. 010CK 3 MI ADOW OAK ARI
SIB, 1171N._7NW_"Woro,
1i ZWMu . L-
MN 55367
1CIrn1C B1N/nM B9rRn
0710
RWD
1.2
$418 20.
ISS D'A 0113(180 ADDITION
_191/7.
_030031.39407
1550/UW1010_1O11,NOC9LfOPIM9AKCSfSTAT[_S
1/7, SIB, 1111N, R24W
PO 0- 7486 SI CAW
iMN_M30?NAS6
CeSu1SICK-I
0363
P1
1
0363151.394073'1)6031
I55010001070 1011. BLOCK I, IWIAROAKfSfSTAIf
�S1/7. 518, 1171N R?AW
Ylrm
Smarr _0611
RI
I_-
064711,39A071_SS0193{
I
155070001010 ,1011 NOCK 1, 0RIM OA_Kf9fSTAif
31/7. SIB. 1171 N_R14W
�YKrKe
YAmo
OMB
_RI_
1
__ 060811,39407.,.__314756
1,91/7. 924W
Ym
Yme
0671
RI
I
0671 11,39407_117628
1560R)OOIOM_1015 HOCM I, BRW7OAKISIltA1L
S10_ 1111N.
15S07UNICYD_ L016NOCKI,BIBAROAKfSfS1ATf
SI/7. 818,1111N. RTAW_"
0611
R1
1
_0077 11.39407
Id110)
1530/DCTJ1070 LOS7,NOCKI,BEAMOAKISE91A11
SI/7, S I B_I I2IN.RNW_'Sm4
3-
0460
RI_
I
_04e0 i1 _3w 07_
565379
Papa 5
Popo 6
'MEADOW OAK TRUNK STORM SEWER EXTENSION*
ALTERNATED'
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT NO.
CITY Of MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
OSM PROJECT NO. 1748.93
ASSTSSED
-A ASSISS[D
[,NOEL
EL ID,
IAFIFIMIAIMIFC.M
SECIION.IOWNSNIPA
I
AREA
ASSFSSMENI LOL7IVAIENIIPATE-1?
A85FSSMENT
EIFSCRIPIION
RANGE
AOIX1fSS OVMFR
fA-1
70N1N0
PATIOS AREA AFA
AMOUNT
155070-COIOBO LOT 6. BLOCK I. BINAD OAKES ESTATE
SI/7. SIB, 117 IN. R74W
Nino ISmn
05/8•
R1
1 O,S1p SI,JV�OT
$763 97
1 55-0 70001 100 LOT IO BLOCK 1, BRIM OAKES ESTATE
S1/2. SIB, 112 IN. R74W
S-
o
0779
R-1
1 0.71G 51,39407
$38893
P O Bo' 748& St. Clap
t1luo
155 0 70 001010 LOT 4 BLOCK I, BfAAP OAKES ESTATE
51/7. Std 1171N. R74W__
MN 563(12.7486
&remn of Sl. CK -i
0368
P-1
1 0.366131,39402
S513001
1045 N. IbvBwro pk...
15507600)090 L019.81OCK 1, 812092 DAK(S LSIAIF
_ -
SI/7.518.I171N_.R74W
_ MmI1Cdb, MN 55767 M. a F1Tw_L. SkWm
035C-
RI
1 03W !1.39402
$487.91
El- W-W'MJ MN
IS50704101110 LOT II, BLOCK I. BRIMOAKISESIATE
51/7. SIB I171N4 R74W
55362 ww-V.apwB 1. Maya
0357
R-1
1 0.35_7 709407
349269_
P O Bol 74A6 Sl. Clap
I550?04107010 L07 I, BIOCK 7. BRIM OAKES ESTATE
51/7. TIS, I121N:R74W_MN
663O2_1486 Ce la St. Cloud
0,559
RI
1 05(!!'31.39407
_3/7976
. 1S507oloom LOT Z BIOCK 2. BMAR OAKF5 ESTATE
S I /2, 511 1171 N. R74W
3- Sano
0 475
p)
1 0 415, 11.3W W
3662 16 1
I
151 0 70 0020.70 TV 3 NOCK 7, BRIMOAKFS[S1AtE
SI/7. SI8. I171N. R74W
Sora Sino
0451
R•1
1 0454 !1_39407
_$63298
Iy5070002050 L015 NOCK?. BRIMOAKI S[STATE
i!1/],SIA 1171N. P24W
Sino 51-
0703
RL
1 0707 $1.39407
_3919W
15507000:'OBO LOT 6 ITT OCK2;018AAOAKF51S7AT[
51/7. 5181171N. R74W
SC-
S-
�3-
of"
R1
1 0608 11.39407
$847561
155070[371010 LOT/,AI25K20fAMOAKI3ESIAtT
51/2, 51 A 1121 N R74W
3-
0402
9.1
1 0407 71,3940)
15M 39
155070002000 LOT 8 NOCK20R1A.OAKFSFSIAIE
SI/7. SIB. II21N. R24W
" !Taro
0185
RI
1 0285, 71_39407
_ 639179,
OAS I SI AIF
1550)0007100 10110 NOCK 2. BRIM KF
R24W
S 1/7. SIB 1121 N5-
I.
5S-
0781
0.711 11.39401
5391 72
155070007170 10111 _NOCK 7. BTAM OAKF9151AIk
51/7. S1p 1121N R74W
Srtrro 1.
1448
RI_
I 1441 11.39107
_12018541
1 55 0 70007 130 TO? 13. MOCK 2_WLMOAKI'SFSIAIE
_3117. SIB. 1121 N.R24W
Sora Sino
0496
IT
1 0496 31,39407
_ 369143
ISSO70 Pp160 10116NOCK?_BfiMOAKI'SISIAIE
51/)_!101171 N_ R74W
9oro 3-
0770
RI_
I 0770
11.39407
73/638
15507D007170 LO 117.NOCK2,ORIMONOSISIA_lE
,51/7_ SM. 112IN_R74_W
S7me Sttms
OT4
R1
1 0_741
11,30107
131014
039 NWvk b Toe SWctt
ISSO7D{g7F110 L014 NOCK 7. BRLN20AKIlf3IA1[
31/7.118. 1121N, R74W
MN56377 ITA4S1D SPobrl`Cobcn_
OIM
R1
1 Ob111_39401_"a?
-
_ -
75:5 8no Outm BNe
15S07D41E)X L019, NOCK .ITT OAKISISIAIC
1T/). SLA I121N,%4W
.11Ic669,MN 55'67
MalinR SDn L.#?corl
- _ _ _ _ ._11.3L4
0301
RI
1 0301
71.39407
_141960
-
3uNh Munllc kp MN
13507<)007110 10111,NOCK 7_BRIM OA103171ATF
_ SI/7318.IITIN_R74W
55362__
B4F.OR SAm L RK7ggatwr(
0781
RI
I 0711
11,30107
_{3011?
Popo 6
15.SO430012(10 OUROI4MEADOWOAK 3177, S 16. 1121 N. 274W S`- SSIt4 3(14 RPM 1.7 36MI 11,39407 15016b
155-04301Hy10 OUIIOIMMI'MOWOAK 31/2.316.11?IN.R74W %- lrrro 0810 aPUD 12 0972 11,394 02 II,3M06I
rvai.x 7y RN1K74 ol city nun noon of
NA caUnry roes 75 316. 1171 N. 024W NA MKtnceb 10.1 ly7 23640 1147016D 1 73640 11304,02 137.06710
Capo 7
'MEADOW OAK IITUNK STORM SEWER EXTENSIONNT'
ALTERNATE 'D'
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT NO. _
CITY OF MONTICELLO. MINNESOTA
OSM PROJECT NO. 1748.93
ASSESSED
AREA
AS -0
PARCEL TO
ACTION. TOWNSHIP&
ASSISSMENIIFCKINALFNTIRATEPER
ASSSSMFN7
'IUYFlFR ABMEYIAT(D I FrAL DFSCMPIIC)N
7ANI.F
ADDWSS OWNER
,AREA
(Acral'
?CNN(.
PAT"
(ARTA
AFA AMOUNT
South M -W6 . MN
ISS -070,002140 LOT 14. MOCK 2. PRIM OROS ESIAIT
S 1/7. 518. 1171 N. R74W
55362 W11bn G 6 Mary 8 Stnaual
04Y.•
R -I
1
0477
$1.30402
$58827
PO 80. 7486. St. Cloud
155070 002150 LOT 15. NOCK 2. BRAR OAKFS ESTATE
S 112. SIG. T121N 074W
MN 56307.1486 P1att1'p64an70151 Cl -I
0450
R-1
1
0450
$1.30407
$677311
210160IN511WIN,W,.
155-001 OMMIO Ounot A SANDBFRG FAST
N 1/7. 516, 1171N, R74W
MmAI, talo. MN 55358 ROMmy F.6 Kaon D Not01
17.5]1
R 1
1
17 534
31.]04 02
$24 447 00
1554301-007070 ,LOT 7. BLOCK 2. SANDBFRG IASI
N 1/7_518, 1171N. R24W
Sano Sono
0500
R-1
I
05001
$1,304,07
_500/0i
155-001007060 -0017060 LOT 8. 81OCK 2. SANOFR RGIASI
NI/7. 518 112 1 N. R24W
S 5-
orts
0,500
R1
I
(TWO
$1.30407
$60101,
I
1550610020.97 1010. BLOCK 7. SANDUPC EAST
NI/2. SIB. II21N, R74W
%- 5-
0,5M
9.1
1
0500
$1.30407
3607011
16SO61071100 HOT 10. BOCK 7. SANOB( RG FAST
N 1/7. 518. 1121N. R74W
Sumo Sart14
0,5M
0 1
1
0;00
31.30407
_360701
155001007110 LOT 11, BLOCK 2, SANDBERG FAST
NI/7_ SI& 1I21N. R74W
5- Sero
OMIT
R�l
1
0500 !1_30402
560101
15500100717010117. BLOCK 7. SANDOTRGCA41
NI/7. 518. 1171 H, A74W
5- 3-
0.'14
R1
I
0=!1.30407_50070111
ISSOOIi3)7130 1011].B10CK2.SANDIR_FXIIASI
NI/7515.1121N.R74W
So- stns
OS(U
Rat
I
06F)I7 SI_39407
_S00701�
155061001(710 -1011.(MOCK 3. SANDN RG FAM
N 1/2. 516, 117114, R74W
Sano S.-
05W
041
1
0500 !1,30407
1' 661003070 LOT?.BIOCK 3. SIWDBI RG I AM
NI/T. SIG, 1121N. R74W
Sartre 5-
0500
RA
1
OY10 11,394 O7
30_0101
713 -*A GNo.
W,061=14CL LOT 14 BLOCK ). SANDBE RG f ASI_
N 112, $16, 1121N. R24W
MInIKob MN !&362 V.I. G 6 Boroo0144bI4T
0 Ml
_R I _
_ 1
._ _ 0563 S 1.304 07
_
_1
$164 63
_ _
_
Sul10 100 Y1101KKAK
_
L!6d3 011M OUII O1 C, M ADOW OAK
5 1 /7, 518. 1171 N. R?4W
Iro, PVnwIN MN 55441 1400 H- brc
a
1.340
_RPU(?
1.7 _
6606 11.304 07 1
17.716 :0
156d3000400 01!11010, MEADOW OAK
SI/)_SI6, II71N R24W
YTnO 47rro
66;0
RdVD
1.7
10070lI.394-7
_l148(L74n
NA OUitCH L MFADOWOAK
31/7. 31 p. I171N, R7/W
Y>.no Same
0560_R
RID
1.2
11400
-
11.39407
_____
3
_ __
_ _ _ -
t/OImnGlofIIl So/NCw
J/5 3n:Y4m SI -1. St
1550431DI(M OUROIAMFAOOWOAK
51/2, 516, TUIN-R74W
IN" MN 55101.16:0 Fa CMI Mrt 61 SI 8714
4W
RPUD
12
5737
$1.30407'
11,293 491
15.SO430012(10 OUROI4MEADOWOAK 3177, S 16. 1121 N. 274W S`- SSIt4 3(14 RPM 1.7 36MI 11,39407 15016b
155-04301Hy10 OUIIOIMMI'MOWOAK 31/2.316.11?IN.R74W %- lrrro 0810 aPUD 12 0972 11,394 02 II,3M06I
rvai.x 7y RN1K74 ol city nun noon of
NA caUnry roes 75 316. 1171 N. 024W NA MKtnceb 10.1 ly7 23640 1147016D 1 73640 11304,02 137.06710
Capo 7
'MEADOW OAK TRUNK STORM SEWER EXTENSION'
f.LTERNATE'D'
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT NO.
CITY OF MONTICELLO. MINNESOTA
OSM PROJECT NO. 1748.93
J=RO 10111,1
TO'AT'S/IIPB
[AREAASPATISESSOSJI
EQUIVALENTPER
NI
AMOUNT
IATIDIICAl 11,1_171PIION
fAN ,[
ADORFSS OWNIR
(ASSESSED 7 f9(:
A,'AA
NOpOrtY dilLUu of Clty Wtllf� {plin OI
I
I NA lc_= '0 T75
SIB. 1171N. R24W
NA 'Sarno
38 BOCi UN/ONED
1 3111100 51.]9407
SbA08184
RAIIfIOAU RICIII
I—IAG10Nflpf7l/QRN
INA OF -WAY
5181171N. R74W
NA Tn 4pcYToPl CCompLvW
229t LINPONED
1 72961 $1.30401
S3.2W661
/IATI OF UN - ASUSSABIE:
I $1.39407
IIIltetstate HIpT1WOy NO. 94
N I/7, SIB. 1121N. R74W
16.300 uN70NFD_
I 16300 $1.39402
322.72747
TOTAL ASSKSAUI PDOPSI/nll
190567
197 096 51.30A 02
$761. 785 W
INOM•ASiISSAIFI
I
KORVI115:
PO bn 1147. Atnikob,
I
ISSOY OU7010 OU1101A MEADOW OAI(CSIAfC
51/7. 518. $121 N. R24W
MN 55362 CMdMonticob
7Q50
Ewar4tf Ftcortpt
155OY000070 O_U1lOi LMEADOW OARFSIAIE
—CItY
S1/7. -SIB. 112IN R74W
Smw Surto
11.7410
Fwompt I¢Amd
RI1ttlof Wtry-_--_—
SIB. I171N. R74W
5— Sano
31 am
F—vt I Itcompl
MON•ASSISSASII SOOKITTIfS
415.480
(wand I Iw~
`IIOTAI
ITMAIA
I
IASSIlwtNI RAO SCNI-1:
BATS IOUATIOW;
I
1
10NI CIAS9I ICAIION ARI A ASV wWl NI RAI1D
RAR . (IOIAI COSf%j. \ / IOIAI ALA
AOAQnCt/tun_Or—Sluff
•. P.C-t OIC—f—Iovocmonl
x_06
Ir RI snub fo W Rotkfuntgl
I.0
NA. Anamd Iqt IIb lboa
y]. 9nt1)b B ] IOmIIY_RAYduntlA
1 0--
v] 414 m Txnwy
1.7
IdyCmt. 1787.78500
RI M_u4o N[.ro Pan
1.7
♦. 10000vqA
ROYlantbl P4ltnwdlMW powktFtrttMt
1.2
NA. 107 006
Pl R Pafamotco lora • RoddonticA
1.1
PIM TM(mtartfo 104r • MhgO —
1.7
RAR . 11.30A 07
I __
Popo E
PDOo9
'MEADOW OAK TRUNK STORM SEWER EXTENSION:
ALTERNATE 'D'
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT NO.
CITY OF MONTICELLO. MINNESOTA
OSM PROJECT NO. 1748.99
ASSESSED11 AREA ASSESSED
11=R
ISECTION.
TOWNSLRP! UREA ASSESSMENTEOUNALENIRATE PER ASESAENI
All.lATFO LFOAI OFSC.)ON
RAW.F ADFIRFSS hR fA—i 7OMNO RATIOS ARFA AEA AMOUM
I Ill:
NalphWl, pd lkj h U
2.1
I 92
W.0 &.k..
2.1
I 53:
1 ohs ll h
2.1
Iu;Rugbrd&,Am
2.1
I
BC:
kW—. C—PA
1.9
M
LIalI Vldl ftk1
2.1
R:
Nnow IA*.hkd
2.1
Stlna:
kbac School
1.4
1
PDOo9
Council Agenda - 9/13/93
12. Consideration of a resolution calling for a public hearing for
assessments on the Briar Oakes pond outlet --City Proiect &3-I0C.
W.S. )
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The construction of the pond outlet for Briar Oakes is now complete with
the exception of the final restoration and seeding, which will he done in the
very near future. The City was able to save in excess of $1,600 on this
project over the cost of the Oak Ridge contractor by using a local contractor
for the installation and purchasing the materials ourselves. The total
construction cost, including restoration, is $6,217.63. Assuming the
engineering is still approximately $2,000 would bring the total project cost
to $8,217.63.
Using the same percent of benefit as noted on the Council agenda of
August 9, the following assessments are proposed:
Benefited Percent of
Area Benefit Cost
Briar Oakes 61.94% $ 5,()90.00 ' a
Meadow Oak 4th Add. 9.62% $ 790.54
Oak Ridge 20.65r/i, $ 1,696.94 r `
City lasts C & D 7.79'.4 $ 640.15
TOTA1, 100.()01,4 $ 8,217.63
City staff requests that the City Council pass the enclosed resolution asking
for the setting of it public hearing for assessments on Project 93-I0C. The
assessment hearing would he set for October 25, 199:1.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative is to pass the enclosed resolution setting a public
hearing for assessments on Project 93 -IOC at 7 p.m. on October 25,
1993.
2. The second alternative is not to set the assessment hearing at this
time.
20
Council Agenda - 9/13/93
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the City Council
opt for alternative 81 and set the public hearing for assessments on
October 25, 1993.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Please refer to previous agenda items on August 9 and August 23; Copy of
resolution for adoption.