City Council Agenda Packet 09-27-1993AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Monday, September 27, 1983 - 7 p.m.
Mayor: Ken Maus
Council Members: Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brad Fyle, Patty Clsen
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held September 13, 1993.
3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints --A DNR representative will
be presenting the City Council with a plaque in recognition of our tree planting
efforts as part of the Tree City U.S.A. Program.
4. Public hearing for the application of funding to the State of Minnesota for the H -
Window Company, and consideration to adopt the resolution of applicant, City of
Monticello.
5. Public hearing and the consideration to adopt a resolution relating to the
modification of the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1, the
modification of the plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1-1 through
1-12 and Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1-14 through 1-15, and the
adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for TIF District No. 1-13.
6. Continuation of public hearing on Project 93-09C, Alley Improvements.
7. Consideration of storm sewer improvements for Monticello Ford.
A. Consideration of accepting conveyance of tax forfeiture parcel from Wright
County—former Gille Auto property.
9. Consideration of change order #4 to the vehicle storage building, Project 92-06.
10. Consideration of change order M1, the trunk storm sewer extension and
appurtenant work to Hart Boulevard, City Project 93.06C.
11. Consideration of approval of plans and specifications and authorization to proceed
for bids for Improvement Project 93-1 IC, chlorination and dechlorination
improvements to the wastewater treatment plant.
12. Consideration of bills for the month of September.
1:1. Adjournment..
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, September 13, 1993 - 7 p.m.
Members Present: Ken Maus, Shirley Anderson, Brad Fyle, Clint Herbst, Patty
Olsen
Members Absent: None
2. Consideration of annroval of minutes of the reeular meetine held Aueust 23.
1993, and the saecial meetine held Aueust 31. 1993.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by
Clint Herbst to approve the meeting minutes as submitted. Motion carried
unanimously.
3. Citizens comments/vetitions, requests, and complaints.
None forthcoming.
4. Consideration of a request to amend Section 3-3 [Cl of the Monticello Zoning
Ordinance by chaneine the R-1 (sinde family residential) side Yard setback
reauirement from ten (10) feet on both side vards to six (6) feet on one side
and ten (10) feet on the other side.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that the home design that
Emmerich commonly uses is 64 ft wide and features a 3 -car garage. Due to
current 10 -ft side yard setback requirements, it is not possible to place a
64 -ft home on many of the lots in the Oak Ridge subdivision because many
of the lots in the subdivision are only 80 ft wide. Amending the ordinance
by allowing a 6 -ft side yard setback on the garage side of a residential
structure would enable Emmerich to build a 64 -ft home on an 80 -ft lot. The
additional 4 ft of buildable area would enable development of homes with 3 -
car garages that are better balanced from an architectural standpoint.
O'Neill went on to report that Planning Commission recommended denial of
the proposed amendment based on their finding that the present ordinance
requiring a 10 -ft setback on both sides of a residence is proper. It was the
view of the Planning Commission that a 10 -ft setback is necessary.
Reducing one side to 6 ft would tighten the separation between buildings,
which could result in a negative impact on values. Furthermore, the
current standards are reasonable, and reducing them would not be
consistent with the comprehensive plan.
Patty Olson mentioned that she is working with Tony Emmerich on other
projects in Monticello; however, and she is not involved in the Oak Ridge
subdivision and has no financial interest in this project.
Page I C --X-)
Council Minutes - 9/13/93
Brad Fyle mentioned that Emmerich should have designed his plat with lot
widths that would be sufficient to enable construction of the type of homes
that he wishes to build. Shirley Anderson mentioned that she saw no
reason to change the present ordinance.
After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by Brad
Fyle to deny approval of the proposed amendment based on the finding that
the present ordinance requiring a 10 -ft setback on both sides of a residence
is proper. A 10 -ft setback on both sides is necessary in an R-1 zone.
Reducing one side yard setback to 6 ft would reduce the necessary
separation between buildings, which could result in a negative impact on
land values. Furthermore, the current standards are reasonable, and
reducing them would not be consistent with the comprehensive plan.
Voting in favor of the motion: Ken Maus, Brad Fyle, Clint Herbst, Shirley
Anderson. Opposed: Patty Olsen. Patty Olsen remarked that it was her
view that the amendment could benefit the City by enabling home owners to
build larger garages, thereby providing room for items that would otherwise
be stored outside along side garages.
5. Consideration of a reauest to amend Chanter 10 of the Monticello Zoning
Ordinance by adding a provision that would increase the maximum size
allowed for private garages accessory to a residential use in a PZM
(performance zone mixed) zone.
Assistant Administrator ONeill informed City Council that the Planning
Commission reviewed the proposed ordinance amendment and
recommended denial based on the finding that an ordinance amendment
which would allow development of a very large accessory building in a semi -
residential zone, even with conditions as proposed, is not consistent with
the purpose of the PZM district and is not consistent with the
comprehensive plan. O'Neill went on to review the proposed ordinance
amendment and the conditions associated with allowing development of an
accessory structure in excess of 1,000 sq ft.
Brad Fyle mentioned his concern over allowing such a large garage in the
PZM zone. It opens up the same type of development to all PZM lots in the
city, and the size of the proposed structure to be built by Ruff is not
consistent with what's existing in the other PZM zones.
City Attorney, Paul Weingarden, noted that in analyzing the request, City
Council needs to look at what is the purpose of the PZM zone and determine
if this type of structure is consistent with this purpose.
Atter discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded by Clint
Herbst to deny the zoning ordinance amendment based on the finding that
development of accessory buildings in excess of 1,000 sq ft, even with
Page 2 0
Council Minutes - 9/13/93
conditions as proposed, is not consistent with the purpose of the PZM
district and is not consistent with the comprehensive plan. Voting in favor
of the motion: Ken Maus, Patty Olsen, Brad Fyle, Clint Herbst. Opposed:
Shirley Anderson.
Consideration of a conditional use reauest to allow open and outdoor storaee
as an accessory use in an 1-2 (heavy industrial) zone and a variance reauest
to allow a forty (40) foot and thirty-two (32) foot curb cut.
Assistant Administrator ONeill reported that the two conditional use
permits and two curb cut variance requests are requested by H -Window
Company in conjunction with the expansion of the H -Window Company
structure. Under the proposed expansion, the H -Window Company will be
constructing an addition of a size approximately equal to the existing
building. All aspects of the site plan conform with city requirements in
terms of landscaping, parking, signage, etc. Expansion of the facility calls
for use of a small area for outside storage. The area will be screened from
view of the public right-of-way through use of a screening fence as required
by the ordinance. The Planning Commission recommended approval of this
request. The site plan conforms to city requirements with regard to
parking, drive areas, etc., with one exception: the H -Window Company
requests that the curb not be required in parking expansion areas.
Granting of the conditional use permit request would allow the H -Window
Company to develop the parking area without the curb.
O'Neill reported that the site plan also requires two curb cut variances.
One calls for a 40 -ft curb cut on the eastern -most driveway access on
Dundas, which is 16 ft wider than the maximum allowed by ordinance. H -
Window also requests a 32 -ft curb cut at the entrance to County Road 117.
The 40 -ft curb cut would allow for more maneuvering room for semi -trailer
trucks entering and leaving the loading berth area located on the southerly
side of the structure. O'Neill reported that the Planning Commission
recommended approval of both the conditional use permit requests;
however, they recommended denial of the variance requests based on their
finding that a hardship had not been established. At the same time, the
Planning Commission felt that the zoning ordinance limiting curb cuts to
24 R wide was particularly restrictive: therefore, they authorized City staff
to investigate the possibility of amending the zoning ordinance to allow for
wider curb cuts in industrial zones.
O'Neill went on to report that in his discussions with the City Planner, he
has found that most zoning ordinances include a provision that allow for
much wider curb cuts in industrial and commercial zones. Some cities have
regulations that allow the City Engineer and 7.oning Administrator to
establish the proper curb cut width on a case-by-case basis in industrial and
commercial areas.
Page 3 0
Council Minutes - 9/13/93
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by
Patty Olsen to approve the conditional use permit requests. Motion carried
unanimously.
A motion was also made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Patty Olsen
to grant the curb cut variance request based on the finding that the
additional width will provide improved ingress and egress for semi -trailer
trucks and, thereby, improve traffic flow and associated traffic safety and
authorize City staff to investigate options for modifying the zoning
ordinance to provide more flexibility in establishing curb cut widths as
requested by the Planning Commission. Motion carried unanimously.
Consideration of leasing a portion of 5th Street right of way to Sunny Fresh
Foods for development of a paved parking area.
Assistant Administrator O Neill reported that in conjunction with
development of an upgraded parking area on the east side of the Sunny
Fresh facility, Sunny Fresh Foods requests that the City grant permission
to include a portion of the 5th Street right-of-way in the parking lot. The
dimension of the 5th Street area to be used is approximately 18 ft x 122 It
(2,196 sq ft). In recent months, Sunny Fresh Foods has undertaken a site
reorganization and beautification effort. Up to this point, the efforts have
included: refurbishing of the lab facility, demolition of a storage building in
the area, and other site beautification efforts. Since none of the
improvements appear to constitute an expansion of the facility, the City has
not required that additional parking be created or that non -conforming
parking areas be brought up to code. The parking area proposed for
developments is being completed voluntarily by Sunny Fresh and represents
an improvement to a lawful non -conforming use.
Sunny Fresh Foods has been utilizing the 5th Street right-of-way for some
time as a place for spillover parking. Their request now is to formalize this
use. They have noted that the City has not objected to the use of this
property by Sunny Fresh in the past and, therefore, feel that paving the
area will not create problems. The 5th Street right-of-way is owned by the
City but is also provided to Burlington Northern by casement for use as a
railroad right-of-way. The lot itself will he 20 ft from the railroad tracks,
and it does not appear that there will be any conflict between the track and
the parking lot.
O'Neill went on to note that the terms of the lease as suggested by the City
Attorney are as follows:
Lease duration should be no longer than one year for the first year
and shorter time periods thereafter.
Page 4 9
Council Minutes - 9/13/93
2. No activity at this location would be allowed other than vehicle
parking.
3. Insurance would need to be provided by Sunny Fresh naming the
City as the third party beneficiary.
4. Any improvements (curb and gutter) become the property of the City.
5. A lease payment amount needs to he established, this amount as
determined by City Council.
6. The lease is not permanent; therefore, the 5th Street parking spaces
provided cannot be identified as a portion of required parking spaces
that may be needed in conjunction with potential future expansions to
the Sunny Fresh operation.
The City Council reviewed the matter and discussed the appropriate dollar
amount for the lease agreement and directed staff to negotiate the lease
amount with Sunny Fresh and report back to Council.
After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded by Clint
Herbst to enter into a lease agreement with Sunny Fresh Foods which
would allow temporary use of a portion of the 5th Street right-of-way for
private parking by Sunny Fresh Foods. The City Attorney is directed to
prepare the lease agreement accordingly. The cost of the preparation of the
lease agreement is to be paid by Sunny Fresh Foods. Lease approval is
contingent on establishment of an appropriate lease price or contingent on
approval by Burlington Northern. Motion carried unanimously.
8. Review Communitv United Methodist Church or000sal for olacement of a
12' x 52' temoornry classroom on site.
Bill Caldwell, representing United Methodist Church, was in attendance to
discuss the church's desire to place a 12' x 52' temporary classroom on the
site of the Methodist Church. Caldwell explained that the Methodist
Church is in the process of establishing a lung -tern facilities plan to handle
recent and future church growth. The temporary classroom is intended to
address the overcrowding problems that the congregation is now facing.
Caldwell noted that the existing structure does not have sufficient
classroom space, and the temporary structure would be used solely for
classroom purposes.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill noted that this proposal is in conflict with
the city ordinance and, therefore, a formal zoning ordinance amendment
would need to be adopted in order for this proposal to go forward. The main
problem with the proposal is that the Methodist Church is located in an
Page 5
Council Minutes - 9/13/93
industrial zone; therefore, any expansion of the facility or intensification of
its use is limited due to the fact that the church is a non -conforming use.
In addition, parking on site does not meet code; and in the past, the City
has not allowed institutions to expand without providing sufficient parking
for the expansion. O Neill went on to say that this situation is somewhat
unique because in this situation, the classroom facility would be temporary
in nature; therefore, there may be a way to adjust the ordinance to allow a
temporary expansion of a non -conforming use.
After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by
Shirley Anderson to authorize City staff to prepare a zoning ordinance
amendment that would address the situation faced by the Methodist Church
with regard to their request for a 12' x 52' temporary classroom structure
and schedule a public hearing accordingly. Motion carried unanimously.
9. Consideration to authorize Business Development Services, Inc., (BDS, Incl
to prepare Part Il of the State's Economic Recovery Fund Application and to
call for a public hearine - H -Window Company finance plan.
011ie Koropchak requested that the Council consider authorizing Business
Development Services to prepare Part 11 of the State's Economic Recovery
Fund Application and call for a public hearing, which would be conducted
on Monday, September 27, 1993. Koropchak went on to review the finance
plans supporting the expansion of the H -Window Company and noted that
the plan calls for obtaining $400,000 through the State of Minnesota
Economic Recovery Grant Fund.
After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by
Shirley Anderson to authorize BDS, Inc., to prepare Part 11 of the Economic
Recovery Fund Application and call for a public hearing relating to the
funding for September 27, 1993. Motion carried unanimously.
10. Consideration of a resolupon supnortine Wrieht Countvs proclamation of
Waste Reduction Week, September 27 to October 2, 1993.
John Simola reported that at the request of the Wright County Solid Waste
Task Force, the Wright County Board of Commissioner's proclaimed the
week of September 27 through October 2, 1993, as Waste Reduction Week.
Various activities are being planned county wide to give citizens a renewed
awareness of the importance of waste reduction and recycling. Simola
requested that Council support this activity and consider additional
incentives to give our recycling program another shot in the arm. Simola
explained that participation in the recycling program has been decreasing.
As evidence, he noted that during the month of August, the waste going to
the Wright County Compost reached a high of 150 tons. This is the highest
Page 6 0
Council Minutes - 9/13/93
figure that we have had since starting our recycling program. Conversely,
the tonnage of recycling items has dropped in August. Only 17.6% of our
waste stream was recycled when yard waste products are excluded.
Ken Maus noted that as of late, we've been falling short of our recycling
goals. We need to do something to rejuvenate the program. Brad Fyle
concurred that we need a boost to the program.
After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded by Shirley
Anderson to adopt the resolution and direct the Monticello Recycling
Committee to develop additional activities for city residents and associated
incentives to encourage recycling during the week of September 27 to
October 2. Motion carried unanimously.
SEE RESOLUTION 93-33.
11. Consideration of a resolution calline for a oublic hearine for the installation
of a pond outlet from Meadow Oaks to the Mississiooi River.
John Simola noted that City Council has been reviewing the need for the
Meadow Oaks pond outlet recently and that perhaps the next step is to
adopt a resolution calling for a public hearing on the installation of the
outlet.
Atter discussion, it was the consensus of the City Council that further
action on development of the pond outlet should be postponed until
completion of an overall storm sewer policy.
Brad Fyle suggested that the City consider allowing the Meadow Oaks pond
to hold more water. Perhaps the outlet could he designed to handle a
smaller amount of water.
After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded by Clint
Herbst to postpone holding a public hearing for the installation of a pond
outlet from Meadow Oaks to the Mississippi River pending development of a
city-wide storm sewer assessment policy. Motion carried unanimously.
12. Consideration of a rosolugon calling for a nubli& hearine for assessments on
the Briar Oakes annd outlet --City Proiect 93 -IOC.
John Simola reported that construction of the pond outlet for Briar Oakes is
complete with the exception of final restoration and seeding. This will be
done in the very near future. The City was able to save $1,600 on the
project for the cost of the Oak Ridge contractor by using a local contractor
and by purchasing materials ourselves. Simola went on to review the
proposed assessment roll.
Page 7 0)_
Council Minutes - 9/13/93
After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded by Shirley
Anderson to adopt a resolution setting a public hearing on adoption of the
assessment roll for Project 93 -IOC at 7 p.m. on October 25, 1993. Motion
carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 93-34.
13. Other Matters
A. Clint Herbst brought up the topic of City employee use of comp time.
After discussion, it was the consensus of City Council to authorize
City staff to research comp time policies adopted by other
communities and report to Council accordingly.
There being no further discussion, meeting was adjourned.
Jeff ONeill
Assistant Administrator
Page 8 001-
Council Agenda - 9/27/93
Public hearing for the aotalication of funding to the State of Minnesota
for the H -Window Comoanv. and consideration to adout the resolution
of auulicant. Citv of Monticello. (O.K.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Council is requested to open the public hearing for the application of funding
to the State of Minnesota to assist the H -Window Company, applicant being
the Citv of Monticello.
PROJECT
For the past year, the Monticello Economic Development Team and Business
Development Services, Inc., (BDS) have worked with the H -Window Company
(Steven Lemme, President and General Manager; Knut Flakk, Chairman of the
NAWCO Board; and Gunnar Bockmann, NAWCO Board of Director) to develop
a financial package acceptable and attainable to all.
The initial sources of funds included hank, $1,175,(K)0; State of Minnesota,
$500,000; and equity, $400,000. TIF wits proposed as "write-down" of the
company's debt service. The financing package total; $2,075,000:
constructio»/site improvements, $9251,000; equipment, $650,000; working
capital, $400,000; and capitalized inwrest/financing, $100,000.
The 251,600 sq ft manufacturing expansion will have an estimated market value
of $691,200, and the 4,(x)0 sq it second -flour office expansion will have an
estimated market value of $40,000. The expansion will create 60 new jobs and
retain 351 existing jobs.
On lune 22, 1993, Part 1 of the City of Monticello s Community Development
Application to assist the H -Window Company was submitted to the
Department of Trade and Economic Development IDTED). The City's initial
request was for the amount of $5500,000 with a State forgiveness of $51,000 per
job created.
On September 2, 1993, the City of Monticello received it letter and Part 11 of
the application form for completion and submittal to I)TED. I)TED indicated
they would consider an application in the amount of $400,000 contingent upon
completion of a list of requirements; however, they were unable to consent (<)
debt forgiveness in exchange for the creation of jobs. They suggested the
matter be negotiated between the company and the (lily.
Council Agenda - 9/27/93
Thereafter, an application request in the amount of $100,000 was submitted
to the Central Minnesota Initiative Fund (CMIF) to fill the financial gap
created by the reduction of dollars under consideration by the State ($500,0oo
to $400,000).
The approved TIF assistance is for site improvements at a Net Present Value
of $115,000 over eight years at a 7r4 interest rate. The HRA will recapture the
assistance through TIF District No. 1-7 surplus funds and the projected
increase of increment as a result of the expansion. The Private Redevelopment
Contract between the H -Window and the HRA has been executed by both
parties.
On September 13, 1993, Council authorized HMS to complete Part 11 of the
State's application and called a public hearing for the application of State
funding.
As suggested by DTED, City staff discussed the option W forgive its $100,000
State grant in exchange for the creation of jobs. After negotiations with the
H -Window Company, City staff recommends Council approve the $400,000 loan
structure with an increasing interest rate schedule to assist the H -Window in
the first critical years of the company's growth and expansion as follows:
years 1-2, 0%; year 3, 2%; year 4,31h; year 5, 41h: and years 6.10, 514. The ten-
year loan is for equipment. Staff recognizes that this structure will ultimately
reduce the amount of recapture that we would normally enjoy with this
program; however, the City will recapture the first $100,000 principal payback
and it small amount of interest payback. The recommendation appears to he
a win/win situation for hath the H -Window and the City of Monticello.
The Community Development Application is a Small Cities Economic Recovery
Grant (ERG). If the State approves the requested grant, the City will receive
the $400,000 grant and in turn will loan the grant dollars to the H -Window
Company at the recommended loan structure. The City is not liable ror the
State dollars. The City has the right to relain the first $100,000 principal and
interest payback, while the State retains the remaining $300,000 principal and
interest payback. The City will administrate the State funds as required by
policy.
The ERG is used to create new state jobs and to increase the state's tax
capacity value. It is not intended to displace jobs from one state community
to another. At least 51'6 of the jobs must he available for the low to moderate
income. State dollars are always the Inst source of funding in the financial
Council Agenda - 9/27/93
package to be sought and are only used for "gap" funding. Documentation from
lending institutions and other funding sources as to the maximum level of
Financing assistance available for the project funding is required.
PUBLIC HEARING
The following citizen participation process is intended to provide direction and
guidance in meeting the public participation requirements as set by the State.
A minimum of one public hearing must he held to obtain citizen input
on the proposed project.
The hearing (S^ptember 27, 1993) must be held prior to the
submission of the application (October 15, 1993) at a time
convenient (approximately 7 p.m.) to all community residents.
Extensive notice of public hearing should he made at least two
weeks prior to meeting through all available resources such as
the media ( Monticello Times, September 16 and 23,1993); at local
organizations (Industrial Development Committee meeting,
September 16, 1993, 7 a.m., and tit the Monticello Rotary
International Club, September 27, 1993, 12:00 noon.), and
postings (Monticello City Hall).
Location of the public hearing must have handicap accessibility
(Monticello City Hall Council Chambers, Monticello, Minnesota,
which is a public facility constructed in compliance with the
Minnesota State Iluilding Codes and Standards.)
Detailed information regarding the proposed project should he
communicated at the public hearing, including but not limited to:
Project scope and tylw of activities involved.
Implementation schedule.
Overall cost and the proposed financing for the project.
Project costs to Fu assessed to community residents.
Other associated project. costs such as maintenance
expenses, etc.
At the public hearing, specific time and opportunity must he
given citizens to identify other community development needs in
addition to the need(s) addressed by the proposed H -Window
project contained in this application.
Council Agenda - 9/27/93
The County of Wright will submit an application for State
funding to assist Standard Iron and Wire Works, Inc. The
$250,000 request is for equipment. The maximun dollars
awarded by the Stale to a government unit per the State's fiscal
year is $500,000; therefore, the City of Monticello is not the
applicant .
C" The needs of non-English speaking residents must be planned for
and accommodated at the public hearing.
Written complaints or other comments solicited and received as
a result of the public hearing must be, responded to in writing
within 1.5 days.
An affidavit and the minutes of the public hearing should he kept on
tile, available for public inspection, by the applicant until
implementation of the proposed project is completed.
2. Other efforts should he. made to furnish citizens with detailed
information regarding the proposed projects.
After communication, discussion, and public comments have been heard, the
request is to close the public hearing and to then consider the resolution of
applicant.
RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTION
'rhe resolution states that the City of Monticello will act as the legal sponsor
for the project.; that the City has the legal authority to apply for financial
assistance and the financial capability to ensure development of the project;
that the City has not violated any federal, state, or local laws and has not
incurred tiny coats nor entered into tiny agreement to purchase property.
The resolution further states that if the application is approved, the City will
enter into an agreement with the State certifying it will comply with the laws
and regulations of the program, and that the City will obtain rnd review
fanuncial information from The H -Window Company, and that the City and the
City Attorney will disclose any adverse information identified.
If the resolution is adopted, kick Wolfsteller is authorized to execute all
agreements necessary for implementation of the project on Ixhalf of the City,
and to authorize submission of the grant application and it copy of the adopted
resolution to the Department of DTED on October 15, 1993.
Council Agenda - 9/27/93
The City Council is now requested to consider action to adopt or to deny
adoption of the resolution.
B. ALTERNATIVE. ACTIONS
S� C 1. Motion to adopt the resolution of applicant authorizing Rick Wolfsteller
to submit the Community Development Application on behalf of the City
4`J of Monticello to the Department of Trade and Economic Development
and to approve the recommended loan terms.
2. Motion to deny adoption of the resolution of applicant, thereby denying
authorization to submit the Community Development Application on
behalf of the City of Monticello to the Department of Trade and
Economic Development.
3. Motion to table the agenda item.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative # 1. Staff views the H -Window expansion as an
asset to the City of Monticello, supports the need for "gap" financing, and sees
the grant payback as an economic development benefit to the community.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the resolution for adoption; Public hearing notice: Letter to the State;
Proposed recapture schedule.
RESOLUTION 83
Copr
RESOLUTION OF A.PPLICA.N'1'
FOIL DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUNDING
BE IT HESOI,VF,D that Lite City of Monticello act as Che legal sponsor For project(s)
contained in the Community DevelopmenL ApplicaLion to he submitted on
Octoler 15, 1993, and that hick Wolfsteller is hereby authorized to apply to the
Department of Trude and Economic Development for funding of this project on behalf
of the City of Monticello.
13E IT Fl-11011EIL ILESOLVFI) that the City of Monticello has Lite legal authority to
apply fur financial assistance, and Che institutional, managerial, and financial
capability to ensure adequate construction, (operation, maintenance, and replacement
of the proposed project for its design life.
BE IT FUHTH EIt HESOLVED that Lite City of Monticello has not incurred any costs,
has not entered into tiny written agreements to purchase properly.
fill 1'I' FUIL'lliWit IOISOI'VED that Che City of Monticello has nut violated any
Federal, State, or local laws pertaining to fraud, bribery, graft, kickbacks, collusion,
conflict of interest, or other unlawful or corrupt practice.
BE IT FUH'I'1Ilet( 101,SOINEI) that upon approval of its application by Lite stats, Lite
City of Monticello may enter into an agreement with Lite State of Minnesota For the
above -referenced project(s), and that the City of Monticello certifies that it will
comply with all applicable laws and regulations its stated on till contract. agreements
and described on Cite Compliances Checklist (of Che Community Development
Application.
AS APPLICABLE, BE IT IeUH'I'IIEIL ILIESOI,VEI) that Ute City of Monticello has
obtained credit reports and credit information from Cite H -Window Company. Upon
review by Lite City of Monticello and Paul Weingarden, City Attorney. tea adverse
findings or concerns regurding, but not limited ta, tax limns, .itidgeuetts, court
actions, and filings with state, federal, and other regulatory agencies were identified.
Failure Lu disclose tory such adverse information could result in revocation or other
legal action.
NOW, THEHEFOIO' BE IT ILESOLVI;D that Hick Wulfsteller is hereby authorized
to execute such agreements as are necessary to implement Lite pruject(s) un behalf (of
Lite applicant.
v
RESOLUTION 93 -
Page 2
I CERTIFY THAT Clio above resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City
of Monticello on this 27th day of September, 1993.
City Administrator
SIGNED:
Mayor
tttttt44tt*kftktt4tt4tkkt4tlttttkktkttktk4ik!
WITNESSED:
(Signature) (Signature)
(Title) (Date► (Tiuo) (Dale)
D
LJ
state or pam..oto
SECRETARY OF STATE
CERTIFICATE OF ASSUMES NAME
Mt,s nesrNa Starufes Chapter 333
The riling of an conumed name does not
ppoten a Men a eatlup right
elvs 10 that name
T 0 tiling Is te8t&pd as a consumer patlec•
60n}�N ordar to amble cpheunM. t0 be oda
b N�erAfy tiff true owner of a busktes., ,I
'TOU' t; Stats the ex.et assumed name uhderi-.a Ilkr.p414a
all'R j" �•
_ el!o.slyre%_
�IiMIA���
•
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
0 ^•
CITY OF MONTICELLO-COUNTY OF WFUGHT-STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Montce110 wnl Ih01d a ptbllc Muksq pn Monday,
September 27, 1993, at 7 p.m„ In Na Council Chambau. 250 East Broadway, Monticello,
Q
Minnesota 55362, to conlder making an application for Nndng ro 113 State"m Minnesota render
the Smell Cities Econwn OevalopmenI Program for an ocoromk development project
The and !til r09ulremerta a
..
1;
program coal off expbined. Comments and aueeUon be welcome.
Under consideletion will be a praposai to p$at Ina H.yyindow Comperry.
TheSlate'$ progfem Is designed t0 provide aspstante to palate bmNesaef'ln getting started
..,1:Rkk
.5 2 s. 1 netainq tow and moderate income persons. For in orma ort. can 011ie
'•i!
AGE FORECLOSURE SALEi'-is•r? �'i{SppL'.iS+';
Y(glfslsnar; Clnryy AdmlrUfNatd'27t1np1-0'a;HlnY�ld
23.7993y, n.f b} rr.r7 di s;'tti;•-f}:ht, rFi�r'i'.:y a..i•;. ..i J, ,I; •3„L 1. .�
It ha occurred In th copditlrt ollhs lolwln •'.W1i
a ladkatgl!b.m1901�naF1
Qo pft1n76de +�IIUIIs tT$Igilln, Prn'110 "I na'•ni "t)'I''h' �•i •',..I
1 Oil.
ITGAGE: $58,000,00 r '.
EXHIBIT A
i ♦, 1989. OMee of Wright County Recorder, Buffalo,
' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARI7t0 '
Cft'Y OP MONTTCELLO-COUNTY OF WRIGHT-STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HERESY GIVEN that the City Council (the *Council') In and for the City of
hat part of Lot 6 and the Westerly 50 feat of Lot 5, pt
accordnq to plat on file and of record In the oMce of
Monacan, rNx4y of Wright, Stare of aan"llulla, will 11.111 a I.Anlo hearing m Sarlamhwr 77,
1993, at epproxtnplely 7p m al Clty Hall, 250 Eml &oad Monticello, Mamesote,
of Wright Slate of Minnesota, excepting therefrom
my, retailing to
the pro=d modificatlan, by lncraased project costs. the Housfnq and Redevelopment
lies Northerly of the creek which runs tihrourM the
Authority's Redevelopment Project No. 1 and the approval end .dgptfon or the Modlfied
.TED: Wrpm
Redevrebpmam Plan noting theraW; Oro roposed modification, by Inaeaaed WoleCl costs, of
the Mods ped Tax intramant FinanCing P for Tax
JE ASO DATE OF NOTICE. INCLUDING TAXES,
ons Increment Financing Districts No 1-1
through 1.12 and Tax Increment Financing Dlslritts No. 1.11 through 1-15, located wllhln
Rede ni'll an, Project No. 1; and the proposed adoption of Tax Increment Flnanchha Ran roh
ro been compiled with: that no action or proceeding
:over the door secured by said mprty0pe, or any
uh0 to Tax h a mem FhhMdnq Pian No. 1.13, also located wtein Redevaiopmant Protea No. 1,
In
part
fin said mortgage, the above described property will
of pursuant to end accordance with Minnesota S(gjg(ga, Section 469 001 10 489 7, Inclu-
sive, as upended, end Sections 469.174 to 469 179. Inclusive, as amended. A coy of the
Modffad Redevelopment Plan sur Redovebpment Prosed Not and Tax increment Financing
n:
plan. Id lax Inaaman, Fhoncing DI.tr1cp No. L1 IMough 1.15, es proposed to be e0opotl at
M. at 2.00 p M. o'clock
are office of the Clly AdmirUatiator at City Heil rwt later that August 25, 1993.
Deportment, Wright County Administration Bu iding,
The property comprising Tax Increment Financing District No. 143 Is es follows:
ntl taxes, t amy, an falai pemiae- and the cotta and
CREILON
Let 7 and Loi 8, Block 2. Oakwood Induussttrial Paa
rk
kwod
by Iaw, fable. to redemption within 6 munUah
PID NWidler. 155.018 002070
their personal re esenlanvo. ar assign.
None,
PID Number: 155.018 0020
08
non mortgage:
Further --atpn raparding the WentiOcaeon of ire DarcN to be ekkded in Tax Increment
Flnondnq D'Iss No, 1.13 may be obbined from the offlte of the City Administrator.
,u intaated per.on may appear at the bearbhq and present 0*11 views orany, or b.1111,,
Dated: t23 1993.
-By Own OP' THE CITY COUNCIL
.. t
, r
-Rick WoiMtebr, City Adwo dntator r
(SePC 16 Z3. IM)
I by the the matgegapersonal repro•
aSas
J7.
t a XCION,
. waeka ti n pddel older 11enteredd hxrdnr Muvresata
'4 I+
onq other things, that Ne mongngod preml... are
Pn
- .-
17..1,
'
Than five units, are hof properly used agrichalwd
• ( :,rt
w�1 •;
»s
980
r.i'
SI OE CEMETERY LOT OWNERS:
t��ti �•___»,
d nl Its July. IP93 "--ones, bo 11 known to an 0 may
Rlvegltla Cmnelery Is tnkhng action to roctal. for
wt had nnY ecflity las OIaly (80} yearn or tong".
.one di j op a Intandirq 10 slam the lol Ip uta any
7 tlek. tYal llley noUty any member of Ute cemetery
cam, 4+t ,�
IW 17, 25, 2e, 27, 29, 30, 34, 35, 36, 3e, 3S, 4e, 51.
ta, hot, for, no, 111.116, 120, t2J, 126. 120, 120.
z
2. Ise, too, 188, 170, 179, 1St, 183, 185, 107, lea,
5. 238, 241, 244,
i.IlsiF4vi6.Y'�r �.1:C .•} -"��: -v
• •,+
253, 254, 255, 257, 258. 203, 264,
7, 288. 315, 347, 331, 382, 384, 380, 570, 373,374,
ULT I,
irT' W rj {7"7 4 �. �„
4• �� pmnflLouemlr Ft1AfLCT ro. t ata
gloves art Janucry 1, 1091 I
,�••••,,�� '" .w .....,..�.. ....
LJ
state or pam..oto
SECRETARY OF STATE
CERTIFICATE OF ASSUMES NAME
Mt,s nesrNa Starufes Chapter 333
The riling of an conumed name does not
ppoten a Men a eatlup right
elvs 10 that name
T 0 tiling Is te8t&pd as a consumer patlec•
60n}�N ordar to amble cpheunM. t0 be oda
b N�erAfy tiff true owner of a busktes., ,I
'TOU' t; Stats the ex.et assumed name uhderi-.a Ilkr.p414a
all'R j" �•
_ el!o.slyre%_
�IiMIA���
150 Eau Broadway
P. O. Box 1147
Monticello, NN
55362.9245
Phone: (612) 295-2711
Metro: (612) 333-5739
Fax: (612) 295-4404
Mr. Bradley Simenson
Senior Loan Officer
800 Metro Square
121 Seventh Place Bast
St. Paul, MN 66101-2146
Re: H -Window Finance Structure
Dear Mr. Simenson:
September 17, 1993
Per your letter of September 2, 1993, we have had a follow-up
meeting with representatives of the H -Window Company. At this
meeting, we reviewed the terms of the State Funding as outlined in
your letter.
At the September 27, 1993 City Council meeting, City Staff will
recommend Council approve the loan structure with an increasing
Interest rate schedule to assist the company in the first critical
years of the company's growth and expansion, as follows:
years)
1 -2
2nter st Rate -
OS
3
2%
4
3%
8
•S
6-10
5%
The City 'of Monticello recognises that this structure will
ultimately reduce the amount of recapture that we would normally
enjoy with this program. However, this is an opportunity the City
will forego to retain this very valuable company.
J
Mr. Bradley Simenson
September 17, 1993
Page 2
I would appreciate your input and direction as we proceed with this
project. I! you have any questions, please call me at METRO 333-
5739 or (612) 295-2711.
Sincerely,
CITY OF MORTICELLO
011ie Koropchak
Economic Development Director
cc: Steven Lemme, H -Window Company
Pat Pelstring, BDS, Inc.
6)
- SEP -17-'93 FR 10:35 ID:BDS IIK. TEL NO: ?%-9034 13817 P02
MONTICELLO, MINNHSOTA
H•WINDOW COMPANY PROJWT
RECAPTURE SCHEDULE
Principal Amount: $400,000
U
Interest
Annual
8ai0
Tldnl
P41mmn
Yeah 1.2
0%
10 Years
340,000
Year 3
2%
8 Years
$43,831
Year 4
3%
7 Years
$44,831
Year 3
4%
6 Years
$46,163
Years 6.10
3%
3 Years
547,303
Beginning
@B1BGlm
Ending
adilla
Years 1-2
$400,000
$ 80,000
$ 0
»
Year 3'
5320,000
S 37,259
$ 6,060
t?B?,741
Year 4
$282,741
$ 36,853
$ 7,978
3'w,818
Year 5
$245,888
$ 37,002
$ 9,161
SEW
Yuan 6.10
$208,886
132LM
129.030
S 0
TOTAL
$400,000
$51,229
*City Sham of Payback U 100% Recaptured in Month 7 of
Year 3. Total amount of Recapture
is appmx1mately $103,000.
U
Council Agenda - 9/27/93
s. Public Hearin¢ and the consideration to adopt a resolution relating to the
modification of the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Proiect No. 1.
the modification of the Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1-1
through 1-12 and Tax Increment Financin¢ Districts Nos. 1-14 throusth 1-15.
and the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for TIF District No.
1-13.(0. K.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
1. PUBLIC HEARING
The public hearing may be opened for comments and questions relating to the
modification of the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1, modification
of the plans of the existing Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Districts, and the approval
of plan for TIF District No. 1-13.
On August 23, 1993, the said modification and approval of the plans were mailed to
Wright County, School District No. 882, and the Hospital District satisfying the
Minnesota Statutory 30 -day notice requirement. At the City Council meeting, the
Council called for the said public hearing.
On September 8, 199:1, the HRA adopted a resolution modifying the existing plans
and approving the plan for TIF District No. 1-13.
The public hearing notice appeared in the Monticello Times, September 16 and 2:3,
1993, satisfying the Minnesota Statutory public hearing notice requirement.
After comments by the general public and discussion by the Council relating the
modification and establishment of TIF District No. 1-13, the public hearing may he
closed.
2. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION
Consideration to adopt the resolution modifying the Redevelopment flan for
Redevelopment Project No. 1 includes the following:
Modification of the TIF Plans relating to TIF Districts Nos. 1-1 t.hroueh 1-12. and
Nos. 1-14 through 1-15.
Normally, when the Council has approved the modification of the plans of the existing
TIF Districts, the district budgets and expenditures remain its originally adopted.
However, with the adoption of the enclosed resolution, the budget for TIF District No.
1-7 (H -Window) will increase by $126,000. This correlates with the $113,000 (Net
Present Value) pay-as-you-go TIF assistance for site improvements. The H -Window
Council Agenda - 9/27/9:3
manufacturing facility will be expanded by 26,600 square feet and the office by 4,000
square feet resulting in the creation of 60 new jobs.
Both, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and the H -Window Company
have agreed to the terms and conditions of the Private Redevelopment Contract as
prepared by Holmes & Graven. The annual reimbursement to the redeveloper is for
eight years at a 7% interest rate. Upon receipt of the evidence of nxartgage financing
and the itemized listofsite improvements, both parties will execute thecomtract prior
to issuance of a building permit.
And aanroval of the TIF Plan for TIF District No. 1-13.
TIF District No. 1-13 is being created for the Standard Iron and Wire Works, Inc.
project. The budget for TIF District No. 1-13 totals $334,000, the Estimated Market
Value of the land and building is $1,250,000, the Captured Tax Capacity is $55,715,
and the average annual Adjusted Increment is $59,:317. Due to the fact that our
State Legislawrs increased the maximum life duration of an Economic District from
ten to eleven years, District 1-1:1 is an eleven year district.
The TIF Plan is based on the construction of a 48,000 square liwt facility (:32,M)
square feet of manufacturing space and 16,000 square feet of office space). However,
Standard Iron's final building plans show un approximate 52,000 square foot facility.
'file project results in the creation of 65 jobs within the first. ,year and 115 within
three years. The company's headquarter will he located in Monticello and the
company will retain its 28,000 square foot and 14,(lt)ll square hoot manufacturing
facilities in Sauk Centre and Alexandria, respectively.
Both, the HRA and the Demeules Family Limited Partnership have agreed to the
terms and conditions of the Private Redevelopment Contract as prepared by Holmes
& Graven. The $311,000 (Net Present Value) pay-as-you-go TIF assistance for land
"write-down" and site improvements correlates with Lite district's $:334,0011 budget..
The annual reimbursement to the redeveloper is for nine years at it 614 interest rate.
'rhe Reduction In Slate Tax Increment Financing Aid (RISTIF'A) will be paid
annually by the redeveloper to the HNA.
Following the September 27 HRA Puhlic Hearing for the acquisition and disposition
of raw lands (lasts 7 and 8, Block 2, 0111), it is anticipated that the contract will he
executed by booth parties. Thereafter and upon receipt of the contract terms and
conditions, the HILA will convey the property to (he Demeules Family Limited
Partnership. Conveyance tentatively scheduled for Septemlxr 28, 199:1.
The enclosed resolution fear adoption alfi rens Lite alwve inronnation, that the proposed
project would not (wcur solely through private investment, and that the TIF Plan
conforms with the general plan of the municiplity. Additionally, it affirms that
Council Agenda - 9/27/93
District No. 1-13 is established in the public interest because the TIF assistance
discourages the company from moving to another state, increases the state
employment base, and preserves and enhances the state tax base. Lastly, the
resolution authorizes city officials to implement the TIF Plan.
It is anticipated that Mr. L. T. 'Rusty" Demeules and Mr. Jim Moe of Standard Iron
will be present at the meeting to address Council questions.
With the assumption the general public does not oppose the modification of the
existing plans and the creation of the plan for District No. 1-13, the Council is then
requested to consider the following actions.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. A motion to adopt the resolution relating to the modification of the
Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1, modification of the Plans
for TIF District Nos. 1-1 through 1- 12 and TI F District Nos. 1-14 through 1-15,
and the approval and adoption of the TIF Plan for TIF District No. 1-13.
2. A motion to deny adoption of the said resolution.
3. A motion to table the agenda item.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 providing the Redevelopment Contract between
the HRA and the Demeules Family Limited Partnership has been executed. The
project itself meets the community overall economic development objectives and the
Minnesota Statutory requirements.
1). SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the modified TIF District No. 1-7 budget, TIF District No. 1.13 Plan, public
hearing notice, the resolution for adoption, and summary of the financial package.
The amount of capitalized interest will be equal to an amount svfident to pay
interest on the bonds from the date of issue until the date of collection of
sufficient tax increment revenue to meet scheduled interest payments when due,
but not exceeding three years as tegaired•by MW=MMI=L Chapter 475.
Predicting capitalized imetest prior to issuance is extremely difficult as it is a
function of interest nates, duction schedules and tax timid therefore, the
above figure is only an estimate of capitalized interest and is so4em to change.
The estimate of public costs associated with the tax increments financing
redevelopment districts are outlined in the following line item budget:
Land Acquisition
Current Assessment
Futnm Assessment
Plan/Agreement
City Contingency
Discount
Fh ancial/Bond Counsel
Capitalized Interest
'DOTAL
Site improvements
Administrative
Contingency
TOTAL
(As adopted April r, 198
FNIM—":t
(As modified September 27, 1993)
BUDGET
$104,000.00
6,600.00
11,600.00
5,000.00
8,200.00
2,000.00
12,100.00
20.500.00
$116,000
5,000
5.000
S12g.000
I-32 05-
Tai increment Financina
D stzict No. 1-12
(As adopted June 10, 1991)
BUDGET
Land Acquisiticn,
Public I-Ij..
$ 90,000
75-000
....r.,r.
Sural
$163,000
Administratkm
Professional Services
15,000
1Q_000
SUBTOTAL
$190,000
Capitalized Interest
Diems
41,000
4.000
TOTAL
increment Fumciniz
District Nn_ 1-13
x-000
Tax
(As adopted September 27, 1993)
BUDGET
Land Ac pisition
$120,000
Site Development
30,000
Site L..l.,-...--4.
120,230
utilities
23.730
Subtotal
$314,000
Administration
10,000
L.,.'1-...:.-.11 Services
10.000
Subtotal
$344,000
Capitalized InMM
0
0
Discount
TOTAL
_
$34,000
Assistance will be on a pay-as-yoo-go basis which will not exceed $34,249 per
year. The total assistance of 5314,000 rer the tet present value of the
maximum payout at 6.00 pm=at ova 9 yaws.
I-35
S
L
SECTION XIV
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 143
Subsection 14.1. Statement of Objectives. See Subsection 1.4 of the
Redevelopment Plan.
Subsection 14.2. The Redeve:12=em Plan. See Section 1, Subsections 1.1
through 1.20.
Subsection 14.3. Dami0on of the Proiect. The project, located within Ta:
Increment Financing District No. 1-13, consists of the construction of a 47,000 square
foot concrete office/manufacturing facility. This fadlity is to be constructed in 1993
and be substantially completed by Jamtary 2, 1994. The company will initially
employ 65 people at this location and will employ 115 people at the end of three
years. Total new jobs will be 97.
Subsection 14.4. Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financing District No.
1--U. The following property is located in the City of Monticello, County of Wright,
State of Minnesota.
Lot 7 and Lot 8, Block 2, Oakwood Industrial Park.
PID NUMBER 155-018-0020M
PID NUMBER: 155-018-002080
Subsection 14.5. Parcels in Acanisition. The Authority does not intend to acquire
the property listed in Subsection 10.4, which property is located within Tart
Increment Financing District No. 1-13.
Subsection 14.6. Develop^tent Activity in Tarr Increment Financing District No.
1-13 for Which Contracts will be Simmed. The following mss) will be entered
into by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the person(s) named below:
XIV -1 5--
L
Prior to the certification of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-13, a
Development and Assessment Agreement will be executed between the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority of Monticello and L. T. Demeuules.
• w• 1 , X111 •.-l•1 � ���► •1 •Ill ^111 �•
� . • r • r�'. 'I 1,1 1
(As specific development is expected to occur, it will be inserted into this Subsection.)
Subsection 14.8. Estimated Public Impvement Costs and SuMnive Data. See
Subsection 1.10 of the Redevelopment Plan for estimated costs associated with
Redevelopment Project No. 1.
Subsection 14.9. Sources of Revenue. Public improvement costs, and other costs
outlined in Subsection 1.10 of the Redevelopment Plan win be financed through the
annual collection of tax increments.
Subsection 14.10. Original In Capacity. Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subd. 1,
of the Tax Increment Financing Act, the original =capacity value for Tax Increment
Financing DistrictNo. 1-13 is estimated to E1,65O based on the tax capacity value
of all taxable real property within Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-13.
Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subds. 1 and 4, of the Tax Increment Financing Act,
the County Auditor of Wright County (the "County Auditor') shall certify in cut
year the amount by which the original tax capacity value has increased or decreased
as a result in a change in tax-exempt property within Tax Increment Financing District
No. 1-13, reduction or enlargement of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-13 or
changes in connection with previously issued building permits. In any year in which
the cunem tax capacity value of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-13 declines
below the original trot capacity value, no tax atpaaity value will be captured and no
tax increment will be payable to the Authority.
Subsection 14.11. Estimated Catttnred Tax C"cily Value. Put== to Section
469.175, Subd. 1, and Section 469.177, Subd. 2, of the Tax Incremernt Financing
Act, the estimated captured tax capacity value in Tax Increment Financing District
No. 1-13 at final completion will approximate 555,715. This estimated annual
captured capacity value is determined in the following manner:
XIV -2 0
Estimated Tax Capacity Value at Final Completion $57,365
Original Tax Capacity 1.650
Captured Tax Capacity Value' 555,715
Please refer to Exhibit XIV -8 for the year-to-year expected tai increment for
Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-13.
Subsection 14.12. Tune of Tax Increment FiMcing.District. Tax Increment
Financing District No. 1-13, is pursuant to Section 469.174, Subd. 12, an Economic
Development District as described below:
"Economic Development District" means a type of tax increment financing district
which consists of any project, or portions of a project not meeting the requirements
found in the definition of redevelopment district or housing district, but which the
authority finds to be in the public interest because:
(a) It will discourage commerce, industry or manufacturing from moving their
operations to another state; or
(b) It will result in increased employment in the municipality; or
(c) It will result in the preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the
municipality. "
Subsection 14.13. Duration of Tact Incremem Finandu District No. 1-13.
Pursuant to Section 469.176, Subd- 1, of the Tax Increment Financing Act, the
duration of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-13 will be eleven (11) years from
the approval of the Tax Increment Financing Plan, or nine (9) years from receipt of
the first tax increment, whichever is less.
Subsection 14.14. Pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 1(7), specific findings and analysis
relating to the proposed development in Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-13.
Additional relevant dommentation relating to the findings and analysis will be on file
and available for review in the City Administrator's office.
XIV -3 0-5-
V
Subsection 24. I5. Estimated Immrct on other Taxing Jurisdictions.
Test No. 1: The estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions assrmea
construction would have occurred without the creation of Tax Increment Financing
District No. 1.13. If the construction is a result of Tax I=vmetu Financing. tate
impact is $0 to otter entities.
Test No. 2: Notwithstanding the fact that the fiscal impact on the otter taxing
jurisdictions is $0 due to the falx that the ftaancmg would not have accrued without
the assistance of the City, the following estimated impact of Tax Increment Financing
District No. 1- I3 would be as follows if Test No. 1 (the 'hut for' test) was not met:
n'•
- ': Taz Base
Wright County S45,591=5
City of Moaticdlo !15,489,640
LS.D. No. 882 $18,174,450
Hospital District 523,400,486
- r=f*
Wright County
City of Monticello
I.S.D. No. 882
Hospital District
TOTALS
IMPACT ON TAX BASE'
- °Ongisra>?Net FutwsIlet:
;;Tare,lcparity .'TarCapmdtr
Payabter1993 .
$1,650 557,365
$1,650 557,365
$1,650 557,365
$1,650 557,365
WACT ON TAX CAPACITY
Netrar Rues:'1493
31.179
16.313
57.154
-2.6"
1.07327
P+o=tie.TU
517,371
9,089
31,841
7.496
559,797
Please refer to Eathibit XIV -B for the year-to-year expected tart increment for
Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-13.
XIV -4 C5-)
Tax.Cap='ty-
(District%
. ..
Of Eadtyr
$55,715
.122%
555,715
f .360%
555,715
.30691
2551715
+ .M8%
P+o=tie.TU
517,371
9,089
31,841
7.496
559,797
Please refer to Eathibit XIV -B for the year-to-year expected tart increment for
Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-13.
XIV -4 C5-)
Subsection 14.16. Cash Flow Assumptions and Analysis.
A. Future Tax Capacity. Ile estimated future tax capacity of Tax Increment
Financing District No. 1-13 at final completion as determined by the City
Assessor is $54,065, payable 1993. Please refer to Exhibit XIV -B for the
year-to-year expected tart increment from Tax Increment Financing District No.
1-13.
B. Prgjcacd liming. The payment of the first full tax increment from Tax
Increment Financing District No. 1-13 will be received by the Authority in
1995.
C. Original Ta: Capacity. The County Assessor's records show the original tax
capacity of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-13 to be 51,650 for taxes
in 1992 and payable in 1993.
D. Gross Tax Caacill Rate. The gross tax capacity rate is 1.07327 percent.
E. Tax Increment. Total tax increment at the completion of all redevelopment
activity has been caialated assuming a static gross tax capacity rate and a
valuation increased by zero percent (0%) compounded annually.
F. Capital .nditures. Capital expenditures ate a summary of the items
associated with the public improvement ousts set forth in Subsection 10.8 and
are to be financed from the proceeds of the Bonds and tax increment revenue.
Subsection 14.17. Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness. It is not anticipated
that bonded indebtedness will be insured with respect to this portion of the
Redevelopment Project.
Subsection 14.18. Tax Increment Finand" Account for Tax Increment Financing
District No. 1-13. The tax increment received with respect to Tax Increment
Financing District No. 1-13 will be submitted by the Authority to the City and
segregated by the Authority in a special account or accounts (the Tax Increment
Account') on its official boob and records or as otherwise established by resolution
of the City to be held by a trustee or trustees for the benefit of holders of the Bonds.
Subsection 14.19. Modification of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-13.
As of September 27, 1993, there have been no modifications made to Tax Increment
Financing District No. 1-13.
XIV -5 05-
G
I �
t
�
y
W Mti
wFl
+
� l
�
EXMBI T X1V-B
r arr.t- u r.L YEAR-TO-YEAR TAX INCREMENTS
RELATING TO TAX INCRFMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-13
AND TAX CAPACITY ANALYSIS
ADJUSTMENT FACTOR:
A. September 27, 1993
B. January 2, 1992
C. January 2, 1987
D. $1,650
E. 1.04
Base Adj-
Year TC Factor
1992/93 $1,650 1.04
1993/94
1994/95
19951%
1996/97
1997/98
1998/99
1999/2000
20008001
2001/2002
20028003
Establishment Date
Existing Tax Capacity Dare
Fifth Preceding Year Capacity Dare
Existing Tax Capacity Value
Annual Base Year Adjustment Factor
Adj.
Faaue- Net Cap
Annual
Base
TC TC
TC Rant T1
557,365
1.07327
51.716
SO
51,785
555,580
559,652
SIA56
555,509
559.576
51,930
555,435
559,497
$2.007
555,358
559,414
52,087
S55,278
559,328
$2.170
555,195
559.239
52,257
555,108
559,146
52,347
555,018
559,049
52,441
$54,924
558,948
Average mnaul adjusted increment 559,317.
x3v-7
Jr)
y 4, 1989, OMce of Wright County Recorder, Buffalo
hat pan of Lot 6 and the Westerly 50 feet of Lot 5, all
according to plat on Ole and of record In the office of
of Wrlghl, State of Minnesota, excepting therefrom
flea N-^ eity of Urs crash which rims through the
,TED. d
IE AS OF DATE OF NOTICE, INCLUDING TAXES,
,o been complied with; Uml no action or proceeding
ova, the debt senhred by said mortgage, or any pan
I In sold mortgage, the above described property win
a:
193, at 2 00 p re. O'clock
Department, Wright County AdminlstraUon Building,
Ind taxes, If any, on sold promises and the costs and
wed by few, subject to redemption within 6 months
heir personal rep1xresentatives a assigns.
n aro murlyega. f:uie.
I by the malgagor, the mortgagoi a personal repro.
weeks It a jueidd order Is entered under Mlmesola
,ng other things. that the mortgnged pfamL 13 era
than /lye units. ere not property used In ognlcWt..I
989
ROE CEMETERY LOT OWNERS:
1 at It, J*, 1993,00
993 meeting, be It known to all It may
! Riverside Cemetery Is laking action to reclaim ton
31 had any actMty for sixty (60) yeas or longer If any
ons doknlnp or Inlendlrlg to claim the night to use any
asks t� they notify any member of the cemetery
is:17, 19, 27, 2D, 30, 34, 35, 36, 35, 39, 49, 51,
03. 101, 107, 110, 111, 11e, 120, 123. 120. 129, 129.
. 156. 190. 159, 170. 119. 181, 193, 185. 197, 189,
. 239, 211, 244, 2S3, 251, 255, 257, 258, 263, 291,
299, 315 347, 351, 382, 364, 368, 370, 373, 374,
pave. an January 1, 1B9i, I
Bute of Mlm.note
SECRETARY OF STATE
CERTIFICATE OF ASSUMEO NAME
Minnotere Statute. Chapter 333
Ih. 11,1110 of on swarmed name doe. not
poloct o usen'e ..elusive dyfd. to oral name
The filklg . required air a consumer pros.o-
j am fn order to enable consumers to be able
to Fendlryr are bw awns of • bu3lnsee• d,�
Othe the oscl anumed name u til::
which the business b or will be conducted:
lone buelnees name pot appllcallonn): J O
Aaeone te9. '
2 Slots the address of IM pprNyd1dp�d pace of.
bue4ne3e. A cortlplel sbset ed6in a rut
r Ae end real roAs�a fkshber M rsgldred• II
Ne addres. Carnot uses P.O Be.: 816 1Vesj
Rrosdway, Monticello, MN 88362.
3. Lid the name and complete .1,001
address of WI poisons conduclln0 business
1"' the Move Assumed Nem., Attach odd.
shed(.) If necessary If ma business
1. a -Palo$-. preMds ate 1.ppY ter•
raters
nom, and neglste,ed oMce sndre.e of
11 ns Car ".,I-
Jemo. Iler.dul Adurl., ale
Wel M.seweyy, Monticello, MN 55362
4. thl the Blandaud Industrial Code (SIC'(
that m0el sccuateM describe$ the nolue o1
ate buds 1 opernf!n0p undor this name: 69
Detect rine of the 2 dlgll SIC Codes listed
I 1 certify that I am Syllatrad to sign We car•
smcalo end I farther beNfy out I understand
Slot by Sigel We certificate. 1 em udllem In
EXHIBIT A
NOTICE OF PUBUC HEARING
CITY OF MONTICELLO-COU TY OF WRIGHT-STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN That the City Council the 'Council') In and for the City of
Montfceno, County of Wright, Stele of Minnesota, will hold a pubic he'I on Septor.lbe' 27,
1993, a1 approximately 7 p en, at City Hen, 250 Essl Broady:ay. Monticefio, Mlnnesote, reletlng to
the proposed modification, by Increased project costs, the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority's Redevelopment Project No. 1 and the approval and adoption of the Modified
Redevelop enl Plan releting thereto; the proposed modlOcation, by Increased project costs, of
the Modl1led Tex Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts No II
through 1-12 and Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1.14 through 1.15, located within
Redevelopment Project No, 1; and the proposed adoption of Tax ftfement Financtrq Plan total -
In? to Tax Increment Financing Plan No, 1-13, also located within Redeveloppmanl Pro ecl No. 1,
oil pursuant to and In accordance wim jdjnnesote Stntulgl, Sections 469 001 Io 489 7, Ind..
sive, as emended, and Sections 469.174 to 469 179, Inclusive, as amended A copy of the
Modified Redevelopment Plan lot Redevelopment Project No, t and Tax Increment Financing
Plans fa lex Ina emeni Financing Districts No. 1.1 Un, O1gh 1 15, as proposed to be adopted at
the office of ane City Admin!slrator at City 1 fan not later than Augusl 25, 1987.
The property comprising Tax Increment FinancingDistrict No. 1-131s as follows:
LEGAL DEaTIP MN
Lot 7 and Lot S, Block 2, Oakwood Industrial Park
PID Number: 155018.002070
PID Number: 155.018.002080
c:alihbr !n!ormC!On regwd!ng the :JentlRg!on, of the per -.-1 to ba Inctudod In Tax Increment
Financing District Ho 1-13 may be obtlaned Ian cine orrice of the Gly AdmlNsbator.
All Interested persons may appear al the hearing and present their views sally a In writing.
Doled. 3123 1993..,
-By ORV OF 711E CI IY COUNCIL
-pick Wdhte6er, City Administrator
(Sets. 16 a 23. 1993) '
U
'.Neer
U
O
•-4 N.TS I__ . I'
TAR. Iaclomrr atelea aleT11,17 oro. 1-11
PUSUC NEAR910 NOTICE
CfTY O/YONIIICELLO-COA1110NUNIY OFW CC IGHT-STAT OP MINNESOTA
NOTICE to itcnEDY OMEN anal tho Nouskg and Redevelnpmem Authority (oar 'Ardmnityj M
are City of Menacme.
Cox qel Wrlyd Blue of AO,enoaole, w4tl IoW • Iadn4c IuaDq Mandoy,
September 2/, Ig01, at D OD p m , !n Ij.a Cot -I Chamber., 250 Esu Droadway, Monllcollo,
kannesola 55302, r$IOUng to e1e,_. - .ed ecoteelllal and dtspealllan of popery as aulnrl7ed N
au Tu blcrement Flnarckrp Pian Ia leY Increment Flnanc4g Dlselci No 1.13
lha propetry p10 Used sof ecpuldtIon and subsequent disposition within Tax Increment
Fin ng as No 1.13 b as follows:
L / Lapel Doanblron
-nick WMM1UAa CI1y&A6nWahat �41tl Part, Clly of kloro!c000, County of WngM • C
(Sept, to a 93, 1603)
I
Councilmember introduced the following resolution, the
reading of which was dispensed with by unanimous consent, and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MONTICELLO
WRIGHT COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE
MODIFICATION, BY THE HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE
CITY OF MONTICELLO, OF THE REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN RELATING TO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
NO. 1, THE MODIFICATION OF THE TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS RELATING TO
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NO. 1-1
THROUGH 1-12 AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
DISTRICTS NO. 1.14 THROUGH 1-15 AND THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
DISTRICT NO. 1-13, ALL LOCATED WITHIN
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1, AND THE
APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS RELATING
THERETO.
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows:
Section 1. Recital.
1.01. It has been proposed and adopted by the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority (the "Authority") in and for the City that the
Authority modify, by increased Project costs, Redevelopment Project No. 1,
pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to
469.047, inclusive, as amended. It has been further proposed and adopted
by the Authority that the Authority modify the Tax Increment Financing Plans
0
for Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1-1 through 1-12 and Tax
Increment Financing Districts No. 1-14 through 1-15 and establish Tax
Increment Financing District No. 1-13, located within Redevelopment Project
No. 1, and approve the Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto,
pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to
469.179, inclusive, as amended.
1.02. The Authority has caused to be prepared and this Council
has investigated the facts with respect thereto, a proposed Modified
Redevelopment Plan (The "Modified Redevelopment Plan") for
Redevelopment Project No. 1, defining more precisely the increased Project
costs to be made to Redevelopment Project No. 1, the proposed Modified
Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts
No. I-1 through 1-12 and Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1-14
through 1-15 and the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Tax
Increment Financing Plan") for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-13
(collectively referred to as the "Plans").
1.03. The Authority and the City have performed all actions
required by law to be performed prior to the modification of Redevelopment
Project No. 1, the modification of Tax Increment Financing Districts No.
1-1 through 1-12 and Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1-14 through
1-15 and the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-13 and
the adoption of the Plans relating thereto, including, but not limited to,
notification to Wright County, Independent School District No. 882 and the
Monticello -Big Lake Community Hospital, having jurisdiction over the
property to be included in Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-13 and the
holding of a public hearing upon published and mailed notice as required by
law.
1.04. The Authority hereby determines that it is necessary and in
the best interest of the City at this time to modify Redevelopment Project
No. I, to modify Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1-1 through 1-12
and Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1-14 through 1-15 and to establish
Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-13 and approve the Plans relating
thereto, contingent upon execution of the Redevelopment and Assessment
Agreements by and between the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the
City of Monticello and L. T. Demeules.
-2-
S
•1 1111. 1 _). ll1 _11. I_ � \1
2.01. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the
modification of Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1-1 through 1-12 and
Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1-14 through 1-15 and the
establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-13, all located
within Redevelopment Project No. 1, is intended and, in the judgement of the
Council, its effect will be, to further provide an impetus for commercial and
industrial development, increase employment and otherwise promote certain
public purposes and accomplish certain objectives as specified in the Modified
Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos.
1-1 through 1-15.
2.02. The Council hereby finds that Tax Increment Financing
District No. 1-13 does meet the requirements of an Economic Development
District in that it consists of any project, or any portions of a project which
does not meet the requirements found in the definition of a redevelopment
district, mined underground space development district, housing district, or
soil corrections district, but which the Authority and City finds to be in the
public interest because:
1) It will discourage commerce, industry, or manufacturing from moving
their operations to another state; or
2) It will result in increased employment in the municipality; or
3) It will result in the preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the
municipality.
2.03. The Council finds, determines and declares that the
proposed development, in the opinion of the Council, would not occur solely
through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and,
therefore, the use of Tax Increment Financing is deemed necessary.
2.04. The Council finds, determines, and declares that the
proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District
No. 1-13 will afford maximum opportunity and be consistent with the sound
needs of the City as a whole for the development or redevelopment of
Redevelopment Project No. 1 by private enterprise.
2.05. The Council further finds, determines and declares that the
City made the above findings stated in Section 2 and has set forth the reasons
and supporting facts for each determination in writing, attached hereto as
Exhibit A.
2.06. The Council determines and declares that Redevelopment
Project No. 1 is hereby modified, that Tax Increment Financing Districts No.
1-1 through 1-12 and Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1-14 through 1-
15 are hereby modified and that Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-13
is hereby adopted, contingent upon the execution of the Redevelopment and
Assessment Agreements by and between the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority of the City of Monticello and L. T. Demeules.
Section 3. Adoption of Respective Plans.
3.01. The respective Plans presented to the Council on this date
are hereby approved, contingent upon execution of the Redevelopment and
Assessment Agreements by and between the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority of the City of Monticello and L. T. Demeules and shall be placed
on file in the office of the City Administrator.
Section 4. Implementati�?n of the Modified Redevelopment Plan and
Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans.
4.01. The officers of the City, the City's financial advisor,
underwriter and the City's legal counsel and bond counsel are authorized and
directed to proceed with the implementation of the respective Plans and for
this purpose to negotiate, draft, prepare and present to this Council for its
consideration all further plans, resolutions, documents and contracts necessary
to accomplish this purpose.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by Councilmember , and upon vote being taken
thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against the same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, and
was signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Administrator.
Dated: September 27. 1993
Attest:
City Administrator
(SEAL)
Mayor
-5 0
-
EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION NO.
The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the establishment of
the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District
No. 1-13 as required, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd.
3, are as follows:
1) Finding that Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-13 is an
"Economic Development District" as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.174, Subd. 12.
Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-13 consists of two parcels
which do not meet the requirements of a redevelopment district, mined
underground space development district, housing district or soils
correction district. The Authority and the City find Tax Increment
Financing District No. 1-13 to be in the public interest because:
1) It will discourage commerce, industry, or manufacturing from
moving their operations to another state; and
2) It will result in increased employment in the municipality; and
3) It will result in the preservation and enhancement of the tax base
of the municipality.
2) Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the Council,
would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonable
foreseeable future, and therefore, the use of Tax Increment Financing
is deemed necessary.
City staff has reviewed the available financing costs for the
development. Due to the high costs of site development, the project
would not be financially feasible without the City's assistance.
3) Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment
Financing District No. 1-13 will afford maximum opportunity,
consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the
development of Redevelopment Project No. 1 by private enterprise.
-6-
The project to be developed, which will be located within Tax
Increment Financing District No. 1-13, consists of an 47,000 square
foot office/manufacturing facility. This facility is to be constructed in
1993 and be substantially completed by January 2, 1994. It is
anticipated that 97 additional full-time positions will be created as a
result of this project within three years.
4) Finding regarding the method of tax increment computation set forth in
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subd. 3, Clause (b), if applicable.
The Council does = elect the method of tax increment computation set
forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subd. 3, Clause (b).
5) Finding regarding duration of Tax Increment Financing District No.
1-13.
The duration of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-13 will be nine
(9) years from the date of receipt of the first tax increment or eleven
(11) years from the original approval of the Tax Increment Financing
Plan, whichever is less. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section
469.177, Subd. 3, the City requests 100 percent of the available
increase in assessed value for current expenditures.
-7-
O
STANDARD IRON AND WIRE WORKS, INC.
PROPOSED USES OF FUNDS
Land and Building $1,870,000
Equipment $1,255,000
TOTAL $3,125,000
PERCENTAGE BREAKDOWN OF PFnPnSFn SOURCES OF FUNDS
Bank 41%
Small Business Administration 32%
TIF - Equity 10%
Equity 4%
State of Minnesota 8%
Central Minnesota Initiative Fund 3%
Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund 2%
Council Agenda - 9/27/93
6. Continuation of Public hearing on Proiect 93-09C. Allev Imurovements. US.
A. REFERENCE AND 13ACKGROUND:
The public hearing was continued to September 27, due to the lack of bids for the
project. We have now obtained bids for the work and have put together a list of
properties with proposed costs for each property. It is our intention to contact all of
those properties impacted by the construction within our current alley, and to contact
as many µvple as possible who aren't impacted by the alley construction, but would
he. by the patching in the area adjacent to the alley. A copy of the cost per parcel will
be available for your review at Monday's meeting.
It should he noted that there are two options for the existing alley reconstruction in
Block 52 behind Golden Valley Furniture:
Option 1. The first option would replace the alley surface from the Johnson's
building to the stop sign at Walnut Street, and would improve the
drainage for the alley to the fullest extent possible without storm sewer.
Option 2. The second option would slop short of the stop sign by about 50 or 60 ft.,
and should give us enough grade to carry the water away from the
Golden Valley Furniture building, and make adequate drainage
improvements to the alley. The second option would save approximately
a $1,000 on entire project.
*' Please refer to the attached project cost sheet.
During the public hearing, the City Council must determine the amount of support
for the basic project, to see if we should proceed with thal portion of the work.
Secondly, the Council should see if there is enough support for doing the work outside
the concrete alley in the blacktop areas immediately adjoining the concrete surfaces.
If there is not, we should not he doing this work, but having letters drafted to these
property owners instructing them to complete the work themselves as sem as
possible.
Much of the support for the project may depend upon the amount being assessed to
the property owners. City staff has indicated at the last meeting that a 5014
assessment would he reasonable for the work needed to he done in the current alley
and areas adjacent to it to improve drainage. Testimony given at the lust public
hearing indicated that some of the property owners felt that the City should even pay
more, as the drainage has been poor since the original construction in 1974. For
those areas outside the current alley needing only bituminous surfacing
improvements and patching, the assessment should lie 1006, as this is currently
private property.
Council Agenda - 9/27/93
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to go ahead with the project as planned,
omitting those areas outside the current alley needing only blacktop repair.
2. The second alternative would be to do the original project as planned and
include those areas outside the current alley, contingent upon those property
owners providing a 5 ft. easement and paying 100' of the cost of repairs in
those areas.
3. The third alternative would be to shorten the amount of repair area in the
alley behind Block 52 and lower the project cost by $1,000 in that area.
4. The fourth alternative would be to do only the necessary surface repairs in
Block 52, single panel repair in Block 35, and catch basin repairs in Block 34,
which essentially does not include any drainage improvements and would cost
an estimated $2,500, $397.80, and $613 respectively. We would then patch our
own parking lot when time permits.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The City staff recommends Alternatives I - 3 should there be adequate support for
the project, and if not, Alternative 4 as the minimum.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of project cost sheet for alley improvement.
10
ALLEY IMPROVEMENT
Proiect
costs are as follows:
I.
Existing Alley Improvements:
Block 52 - Option it
$
8,167.47
II.
Existing Alley Improvements:
Block 52 - Option f2
$
7,091.52
III.
Alternative "A" - Curb In Parking Lot
$
712.20
IV.
Alternative "B" - Island In Parking Lot
$
900.00
V.
Alternative "C" - Bituminous Paving
$
895.00
Neal Water Tower
VI.
Maintenance Items:
A. Catch Basin Repair - Block 34
$
613.00
B. One Panel Alley Repair - Block 35
$
397.80
VII.
Patching Outside Alley Within
5 ft. Proposed Easement Areas
and Parking Lot ($414.00)
$
2,089.71
VIII.
Project Totals:
1. Basic Project -
1I (Option /2) 6 VI (Malnt.)
$
8,102.32
2. Basic Project -
I (Option il) 6 VI (Maint.)
$
9,178.27
3. Basic Project -
Existing alleys with alternatives
$
11,685.47
4. Full Project -
Existing alley alternatives and
easement areas
$
14,192.67
0
Council Agenda - 9/27/93
7. Consideration of storm sewer improvements for Monticello Ford. (d.S. )
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
Since there is no storm sewer system leading from the Ford property, other than that
located in the Highway 25 ditch, Monticello Ford is faced with having a large
drainage pond on the south end of their property near the Hart Clinic, or constructing
a storm sewer from the south end of their property over to the pond in Sandberg
South. If they do construct the pond on their property, they sre using valuable
property that could be used for the expansion of their business in the future. If they
build and pay for a storm sewer system leading to the Sandberg South Pond, they
would have to pay 1007 of that cost, and would have to share in the cost of an outlet
to be constructed in the future.
To lessen the impact of the drainage into the Sandberg South pond, Monticello Ford
could construct a small holding pond in conjunction with the storm sewer pipe to the
Sandberg South pond. At a later time this small pond could easily he filled in.
The estimated cost of constructing the storm sewer connection is $34,744. Including
all contingencies and indirect costs, the cost could he $46,700 as a separately bid
project.. If the pond construction or storm sewer construction are to he done before
winter, time is of the essence, especially if we have to dig across Sandberg Road and
have it repaired before cold weather sets in. Consequently, we have approached
LaTour Construction for the possibility of issuing a change order to the Hart
Boulevard Storm Sewer Project to have them complete the storm sewer for Monticello
Ford. Since Monticello Ford is the only one benefiting from this storni sewer
improvement, the cost should he 1006 Monticello Ford. For developed property
improvements, the City typically does not go out and require upfront money from
those property owners. Consequently, should Dave Peterson request that the
improvement costs he assessed to him, the City could do so at a reasonable interest
rate over it period of up to 10 years. There is nothing saying that the City could not
however require some money up -front from developed property for improvement. You
could require it portion of it in cash or a letter of credit.
13. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
The first alternative would he that upon receipt of the petition for
improvements from Monticello Ford (which would waive the public hearing
requirements as he is 10('6 of the property owners affected), the City Council
could authorize the installation of the stone sewer by change order on the Hart
Boulevard Project or authorize the City Engineer to develop full plans and
specifications and bid the project.
i�
Council Agenda - 9/27/93
2. The second alternative would be to have Monticello Ford install the
improvements themselves, authorizing the City Engineer to prepare plans and
specifications for the project, paid for by Monticello Ford. They would also pay
the necessary inspection costs.
3. The third alternative would be to do nothing as far as allowing storm sewer
connection to be built, and require Monticello Ford to build a pond on their
property with a small overflow into the existing street storm sewer system.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
At the time of drafting of this agenda item, we do not have actual cost of construction
from LaTour for a change order to do this work, and we do not have confirmation
from Monticello Ford as to which method they wish to pursue. Consequently, the
City staff holds its recommendation until Monday evening's meeting when more
information will be available.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of sketch plan showing proposed improvements; and a copy of engineer's
estimate of cost of the project (Mini Feasibility Study).
12
Qk-
Monticello Ford
Date:
21 -Sep -93
Proposal Form
By:
DMU
OSM No. 4960.09
Schedule A - Storm Sewer
item
Estimated
Unit
Total
No.
Description
i usad"
Unit
Prise
Amount
I
Rcmo.e and Replant Existing Trees
6
EA
$250.00
$1,300.00
2
Remove & Replace Bituminous
100
SY
$25.VU
$2,500.00
3
Remove & Replace Core. Curb
50
LF
$15.00
$750.00
4
Remove Manhole
l
EA
S500.00
5500.00
5
Abandon Existing Storm Sewer in place
i
LS
$51)0.00
$500.00
6
15" RCP CL. 5
12
LF
$22.00
$264.00
7
21" RCP CL. 3
76
LF
$25.00
$1,900.00
8
24" RCP CL. 3
116
LF
$30.00
$3,480.00
9
27" RCP CL. 3
20
LF
$35.00
$700.00
10
33" RCP CL. 2
200
LF
S52.00
S10,400.00
11
Conc. Apron w/Trash Guard
1
EA
51,350.00
$1350.00
12
C.B. 48' Dia.
30
LF
$100.00
$3,000.00
13
M.H. 54" Dia
20
LF
$125.00
; $2,500.00
14
Casting( R-306TV }
I
Fit
5275.00
$275.00
15
Casting t R.1642)
2
EA
$275.00
$550.00
16
Casting ( R4353 }
4
EA
$325.00
$1,300.00
17
Riprap CL. 3
13
CY
$50.00
$650.00
18
Connect to Exist 12' RCP
1
FA
$500.00
$500.00
19
Seeding w/ Mulch and Fertilizer
1
AC
$1,500.00
51,500.00
20
Silt Fence - Heavy Duty
230
LF
$2.50
$625.00
Schedule A Total $34,745.00
t+)6%Continganoy $1,737.20
Sub -Total $36,4111.20
t+)28%Indirect $10,218.90
Total Praloet Cost $46.100.00
COM
Council Agenda • 9/27/93
e. Consideration of accenting conveyance of tax forfeiture narcel from
Wright Countv - former Gille Auto nronerty. IR.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
The City Council is being asked to consider accepting ownership of the Gille
Auto property for the purposes of proceeding with the cleanup of the site,
including building demolition, underground fuel tank removal, and soil
contamination cleanup through the Minnesota Petrofund.
BACKGROUND
To provide a brief history, in August of 1992, the City of Monticello
requested that the County Auditor's office eliminate from the tax forfeiture
sale the former Gille Auto property to enable the City more time to decide if
we wanted to redevelop this site. At that time, the City informed Wright
County that the City or the HRA may have an interest in acquiring the
property if the cleanup of the site was economically feasible. The HRA had
numerous times discussed the possible acquisition of this property and
decided that they did not want to get involved in ownership without
knowing the extent of the potential contamination on this property.
Likewise, the City Council did not address potential ownership, and, as a
result, not much activity took place on this property until earlier this
summer.
Our Building Official, Gary Anderson, continued to work on the blight
cleanup of (his property and also investigated what procedures would have
to he followed to receive reimbursement from the Petrofund if it
contamination leak did exist. Gary requested RFP's from Environmental
C,onsultants to do it site investigation, and the Council authorized the City
to utilize Agassir. Environmental Systems of Hancock, Minnesota, to do soil
(wrings and a site investigation. This Ux)k place during June -July 199:i,
and Agassiz informed the City staff that the potential cleanup of this site
may not he as bad as first thought and suggested that bids he received from
contractors for the demolition of the building, removal of 2 underground fuel
tanks, and removal and disposal of approximately 400 cubic yards of
contaminated soil. The bids also contain provisions for removal of
additional tanks if they were found to he in existence on the property.
While all of the above activities were taking place, the Stale of Minnesota or
Wright County was still the owner of the property. A question then arose
as to whether the bids that Agassiz Environmental had obtained on behalf
of the City for the demolition and cleanup of the site were legal in that the
Council Agenda - 9/27/93
City of Monticello was not an owner of this property. Agassiz
Environmental prepared the specifications, advertised, and tabulated the
bids/quotes, all in accordance with Petrofund guidelines. The problem was,
though, that the City of Monticello would not be an eligible entity for
reimbursement from the Petrofund unless we had an ownership interest in
the property.
The bids that were received by Agassiz for building removal, tank removal,
soil removal, along with their consulting fees, were estimated to be
approximately $56,000 for the entire cleanup of the property. Of this
amount, assuming that we could receive the maximum 9017 reimbursement
through the Petrofund, approximately $41,500 could be reimbursable to the
City or entity that cleaned up the site. The City has already incurred some
expenditures for removing the debris above ground, including grass mowing,
of approximately $3,000. This amount added to the approximate $15,000
that would remain unreimhursed from the Petrofund could result in a net
cost to the City of approximately $18,000 ttt $20,000 to have this site
cleaned up. Although this is not a first guarantee, it is the bestestimate
we have Lit this time with the investigation that has taken place.
As noted earlier, this cleanup process did come to a halt in late August due
to the fact that the City was not the owner of the property and may not be
eligible for reimbursement and because the City did not directly advertise
for bids for the cleanup. City Attorney, Paul Weingarden, is still
investigating, if the City did own the property, whether we could use the
existing bids received by Agassiz or whether we would be required to
readvertise for hids again.
Since we came to at roadblock, the County Ward set it meeting with the
Ways and Means committee and City staff to review what options could he
utilized to continue the cleanup of this site. 7'he committee met on
Wednesday morning, Septem1wr 22, at the courthouse and came to the
general conclusion that it may he it lot easier if the City of Monticello took
ownership of the property and onitinued with the cleanup efforts so that we
could be eligible for reimbursement through the Petrofund. The County
Board will be considering it proposal that the property be transferred to the
City's name without tiny renumeration at this time, with the following
conditions being applicable to the ownership transfer.
County would convey the property to the City without any
compensation by obtaining it quit claim deed from the Stale
Department of Revenue Its stain its possible.
14
Council Agenda - 9/27/93
2. Phe City of Monticello would he free to develop or sell the
property for a fair price with the proceeds being first applied to
all of the City expenditures (estimated at $15,000-20,000).
3. After the City covers its expenses, the County would them
receive its out-of-poc::et costs incurred on this property.
4. If there are still any funds available from the sale of the
property, funds remaining would then he given to the County
for the delinquent taxes totaling approximately $11,300, plus
additional penalties and interest, making the total delinquent
taxes approximately $20,000.
5. Any funds remaining after the above expenditures would
belong to the City.
6. If the City did not receive sufficient funds to even cover its own
out-of-pocket expenses, the County would agree to split any
out-of-pocket costs remaining with the City.
While the above proposal is intended to allow the City to recover its costs
first, the County is certainly protected in that the estimated value of the
property would appear to he more than the $15,000-20,0(9) we expect to
have invested in the parcel. While the Council may he asking why ore we
getting involved in the cleanup process when it should probably he a County
or State process, the only answer I can honestly give you is that I feel that,
if the City doesn't do it, nobody else will. If the City really doesn't want t.o
get involved in the cleanup and doesn't care whether the building is
removed, the underground tanks are removed, or the contaminated soil is
removed, it may be best to refuse ownership and inform the County that it
is up to them to clean up the property. In all likelihood, (rile County may
just proceed with attempting to sell the property as is, which could mean
that the parcel will never he cleaned up or the building demolished.
According to our discussions with the County, (.hey have many other parcels
that could have contamination that they have received through tax
forfeiture, and they do want to set it precedent or get involved in being the
responsible party for cleanup of these sites. As a result, they are reluctant
to he the responsible party for cleaning up the Cille property and would
rather see the City hake the lend role.
One alternative the City Council may wait to consider is an amendment to
condition #4 above. When the City acquired the Outlot A parcel in the
Country Club Manor Addition, we only paid the County the actual
15
Council Agenda - 9/27/93
delinquent taxes and did not pay the penalty and interest. While it may
not seem unreasonable to pay the penalty and interest if there are sufficient
funds from the sale of the property, none of the penalty and interest will
ever he given back to the City, as it is always, by State Statute, split with
the County and the School District. Since the City is taking some risk by
getting involved in the ownership and spending the man-hours necessary to
complete this cleanup, possibly the County should waive the penalty and
interest. In other words, if the County wants to be assured of getting all of
its delinquent. taxes and penalty and interest tlwt have accumulated against
this parcel, possibly the County should be the one to do the cleanup and just
leave the City out of it.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
In order to continue with the cleanup of the Gille property, the City
would agree to accept ownership at no cost under the following
conditions.
a. After cleanup, the City can sell the property and keep sufficient
funds to cover all of its out-of-pocket costs.
b. Remaining funds will then be applied to the County
expenditures.
C. If there are tiny remaining funds, they would be applied to the
delinquent real estate taxes of approximately $11,300 and
delinquent penalty and interest of approximately $9,000.
d. Any funds remaining alter the above expenditure
reimbursements would b c the City of Monticello s.
C. If the City did not seek sufficient funds to cover its own out-of-
pocket expenditures, the County would agree to split any
additional expenditures on a 50/50 basis.
Alternate #2 would he the same as the first alternative with the
exception that the County would only receive the delinquent real
estate taxes of approximately $11,300 without additional penalty and
interest.
3. Do not accept ownership of the properly and defer tiny cleanup of the
property hack to the County nnd/or State.
16
Council Agenda - 9/27/93
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
From a practical standpoint, I'm not really sure if the City should become
involved in this type of cleanup venture; and I'm sure the City Attorney,
Paul Weingarden, would agree that the City is assuming some risk by
becoming the owner of this site. On the other hand, the reality is that
unless the City gets involved and proceeds with this cleanup, I do not
believe the County nor the State will do anything about it, and this property
will remain a bliehted evesore for many years to come. If the City does not
take the initiative, the County may just wash its hands of the problem or
auction the parcel off and a new buyer may not do any cleanup activities
either. If for no other reason than to remove a blighted condition, the City
probably has to be the one to complete the process; and for the risk
involved, I would recommend that if we do accept ownership, we do it under
alternative N2, which should eventually give the County sufficient funds to
cover the taxes but not necessarily the penalties and interest that have
accumulated. 1 think there should be some potential reward to the City or
the HRA in cleaning up this parcel; and the fact that the County will
probably receive all their tax money should he sufficient reward for them.
City Attorney, Paul Weingarden, has been asked to attend the meeting to
provide additional information concerning this item. As it result, he may
have a different opinion concerning my recommendation, which the Council
may want to consider Monday night.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Petrofund letter of September 13, 1993; Summary of potential expenditures
for cleaning up the site.
17
0
OFFICE OF TWE COMMI3MONER
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMIWE
September 13, 1993
Rick wolfsteller
office of the City Administrator
250 East Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362-9245
Re: Gills Auto
Leak f 6549
137 PAST 7W Simi
ST. PAUL MN 95I01
6U/"64=
EA7L• 612/7f44n3
Dear Mr. wolfsteller:
I have received your letter regarding the above-refarenced site.
You have asked if the City of Monticello would be eligible to
receive reimbursement for coats associated with the clean-up of the
Gills Auto Site. Minn. Stat. S115C.09, Subd. 3(d) allows a politial
subdivision to apply for reimbursement where the political subdivision:
(1) is not a responsible person under 115C.02, and
(2) incurs reimbursable costs on or after April 8, 1992.
However, the statute goes on to say that the political subdivision
can only apply for reimbursement if the "identified responsible person
has failed to take a corrective action ordered by the Commissioner (of
the Pollution Control Agency).• It doesn't appear from your letter that
this last condition of reimbursement has been met.
You may wish to contact Becky Lofgrsn (612) 297-8525 at the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to determine if such an order has
been issued. Also I assume that an Order could be issued now since
Gills Auto continues to be a responsible party.
If you have further questions, please contact me.
(612) 296-2284
PLP/cjs
veryy ly yours
01142 ZI_/
Patricia L. Peterson
Executive Director of Petrofund
AN EOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
a
OLD GILLS AUTO SITE
List of Exnenses Incurred To Date 9/20193 Expenses
L SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS:
A. 1992 Levied Special Assessment (mowing) $ 141.08
B. 1992 To Be Levied Spec. Asmnts. (mowing) $ 436.16
C. 1993 To Be Levied Spec. Asmnts. (mowing) 265.00
SUBTOTAL $ 842.24
IL SrM CLEANUP (Above Ground):
A Site Debris (non automotive)
Quality Lawn Maintenance
B. Site Debris (automotive)
Ruff Auto
SUBTOTAL
III. SITE CLEANUP (Below Ground):
A. Soil Investigation
Agassiz Environmental
SUBTOTAL
ReimbursementIBx a c�en
$ -- $ 141.08
$ — $ 436.16
$ — $ 265.00
$ 00.00 $ 842.24
$ 695.00 $ — $ 695.00
$ 1.500.00 $ — $ 1.500.00
$ 2,195.00 $ 00.00 $ 2,195.00
$ 6.851.80 $6,166.62 $ 686.18
$ 6,851.80 $ 6,166.62 $ 685.18
IV. PROPOSED SITE CLEANUP:
A. Demolish Building, Concrete Over Tanks and
Pump Islands
$ 4,983.00
$ —
$ 4,983.00
B. Excavation & Disposal of 2 Tanks
$ 2,530.00
$ —
$ 2,530.00
C. Contaminated Soil Excavation and
New Soil Replacement 400 Cu. Yards
$ 3,980.00
$ 3,582.00
$ 398.00
D. Contaminated Soil Hauled Away and
Land Farmed 400 Cu. Yards
$10,800.00
$ 9,720.00
$ 1,080.00
E. Lab Samples, Labor On -Site, Meters and
Data Reporting
$ 8,582.00
$ 7,723.80
$ 858.20
F. Soil Borings(Water Monitoring Wells
$14.000,00
$12.600.00
S1,400.00
SUBTOTAL
$44,87b.00
$33,625.80
$11,249.20
AUTOSITE.TBL-9121/93
Page 1
09
V. SUMMARY L•
Expenses Incurred to Date:
Mowing, Site Debris, Cleanup, and
Soil Investigation $ 9,889.04
PENDING REIMBURSEMENT $ ¢.1¢6.62
TOTAL $ 3,722.42
VL SUNWARY EL
Proposed Work- Demolish the building and all concrete over tanks and former gas
islands; Excavate and remove two 5,000 gallon underground storage tanks; Remove up to
400 cubic yards petroleum contaminated soils and replace with cleaner compacted fill
materials; Install monitoring wells and sampling.
EXPENSES $44,875.00
POSSIBLE REIMBURSEMENT $33,625.80
TOTAL EXPENSES $11,249.20
VIL SUNM ARY III:
Additional Expenses:
Cap Well $ 400.00
Remove 2 Additional Tanks
2 ® 1,177.00 = $ 2,354.00
Lab Testing and Monitoring 2 Tanks
20944.00c 1.888.00
SUBTOTAL $ 4,642.00
POSSIBLE REMURSEMENT $ 3.817.80
TOTAL ADDITIONAL EXPENSES $ 824.20
AUTOSITE.TBL-9/21/93 Page 2
Council Agenda - 9/27/93
9. Consideration of Change Order 04 to the vehicle storage building,
Proiect 92-06. W.S. )
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
All of the work for the Monticello vehicle storage building has been completed with
the exception of the painting. Painting was attempted to be completed last fall.
However, cold weather hampered the painting operations. A portion of the exterior
paint on the building was not of the proper thickness, portions of the building were
painted the wrong color as the contractor ran out of paint and had to reorder, and
still other portions of the building were painted during subfreezing temperatures
which was not in compliance with the manufacturer's application specifications. The
City asked the contractor for a three-year extended warranty on the exterior painting
system and asked the contractor to finish painting the building in the spring of 1993.
This spring, another problem was noted with the exterior painting system. Some of
the concrete block insulation had seeped through the exterior wall and discolored
portions of the exterior paint. The block insulation (a semi-liquid foam product) was
installed by Tailored Foam Insulation, a subcontractor of the general contractor
Rochon Corporation. No work was performed on the exterior painting all summer,
as the painting contractor refused to go ahead until the problems with the staining
were resolved. The painting contractor agreed to prime the building, and repaint the
entire building, and provide a three-year extended warranty for $11,304. After
several months of negotiation, Tailored Foam's insurance carrier, State Farm
Insurance Company, agreed to pay damages in the amount of $11,304 so that the
building could be repainted. The insurance company, however, requested that they
make payment to the City of Monticello, as we were the owners of the building that
was damaged by the foam insulation. Consequently, in order to pay the Rochon
Corporation the $11,3114, we must do so through the change order process. Change
Order #4 has been developed for that purpose. A copy is enclosed for your review.
13. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative is to approve Change Order #4 in the amount of $11,304
to have the building painted to rectify the staining concerns caused by Tailored
Foam Insulation.
2. The second alternative is not to approve the change order.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director and City Engineer that City
Council approve the change order as outlined in Alternative MI, so that we may
complete the painting of the building as soon as possihle. It is anticipated that the
painting will be completed within the next two weeks.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of Change Order q4.
is
^hange Order No. 4
i :oject: Vehicle Storage Facility, Monticello, MN
Owners: _ City of Monticello
250 East Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362
City Project No. 199206
Date of Issuance: September 22, 1993
Contractor. Rochon Corporation Engineer Orr.Schelen•Mayeron
12866 Highway 55 & Associates, Ina I
: Plymouth, MN 53441 '
i Contract Fun Vehicle Storage Facility I OSM Comm. No. 4900.00
and Appurtenant Work
You are directed to make the following changes la the Contract Dacumenls:
Descripilow The building exterior paint system is in need of cleaning, priming and a complete paint i
job. This change order will provide for the necessary work and also provide an extended labor and
materials warranty.
Purpose of Change Order. Several warranty concerns including thin paint, incorrect color and
insulation staining have resulted in an inadequate exterior paint system. This Change Order is
intended to rectify the staining concerns. Upon payment of this change order, the contractor shall
provide proof of payment to Tailored Fown and all painting contractors. TLe extended warranty
ill be delivered prior to payment.
I
Attachments (list documents supporting change): N/A
CHANCE IN CONTRACT PRICF. , CHANC6 IN CON'IIIACT TIME i
Original Contract Pricer $510,874.30 Original Contract Time: November 15, 1992
Previous Change Orders No.1 to No. 3: Net Change from Previous Change Orders: 4 �
$9,222.75
Contract Price Prior to this Change Order: Contract Time Prior to this Change Order:
$520,097.02 November 15, 1992 •.
Net Increase (decrease) or this Change Order. Net Increase (decrease) of Chnnge Order:
$11,304.00 .0
Contract Price with all Approved Change Orders Contract Time with Approved Change Orders:
$531.401.02 November 15, 1992
Recommended Approved
By: J AJ By:
Bret A. Weiss, P.E. Rochon Corporation
i
_ rP
•movedAyr Approved _ Date of Council Action
I
Public Works Director Administrator
Council Agenda - 9/27/93
t
to. Consideration of Change Order 01. the 'hunk Storm Sewer Extension and
ADDurtenant Work to Hart Boulevard. Citv Proiect 98.06C. W.S. )
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The Hart Boulevard Storm Sewer Project is well underway and should he completed
in the near future. The City Engineer and Contractor, LaTour Construction of Maple
Lake, have requested that we modify the payment units for Rip Rap from the cubic
yard to the square yard. There will be no increased cost to the project for making
this change.
Secondly, during the excavation through the existing parking lot, a large pile of
buried demolition was uncovered consisting mainly of large pieces of concrete and
steel rebar. These materials were removed from the street area and pipe zone, and
were replaced with suitable fill. The cost of removal, replacement, and disposal is
$26.60/cubic yard. Based upon an estimated quantity of 100 yards, the cost to the
project is $2,650. This is the amount requested for Change Order pl.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to approve Change Order #I for Project 93-06C
in the amount of $2,650.
4
2. The second alternative would be not to approve the change order.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director and City Engineer that the
City Council authorize and approve Change Order q1 in the amount of $2,660.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of Change Order t11.
19
Orr
OA SAd1amydeern 37) Perk Place Cmte, 512-595-5775
�ANYMdnA 5775Wey[s, Mri 5kVafd FAX
Change Order
tel, int. Alinncnpolb, MN 55i15.172e FIV(595-5773
:hange Order No. 1 City Project No. 93-060
Project: Trunk Storm Sewer Extension & Appurtenant Work, Hart Boulevard, Monticello, MN
Owners: City of Monticello Date of Issuance: September 24, 1993
250 East Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362 i
i Contractor. LaTour Construction Engineer: Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc.
Route 1, Box 76
Maple fake, MN 55358
Contract For: Trunk Storm Sewer Extension & Appurtenant Work I OSM Comm. No. 5073.10
You are directed to make the following changes In the Contract Documents:
I I
Descriptions This Change Order includes the following Items:
(1) Modify Rip Rai: units from cubic yard to square yard with no unit price increase. The proposal
form inadvertently listed the units as cubic yard, while the quantity was estimated as square
yards. The Contractor bid a square yard price, so there is no change in the construction cost.
(2) Removal and disposal of demolition materials. During the excavation through the existing
parking lot, a large pile of buried demolition material was uncovered. These materials were
reproved from the street area and pipe zone and were hauled to a demolition landfill at a cost of
$26.50 per cubic yard. The quantity was estimated at 100 cubic yards.
Purpose of Change Orders The Change Order Is necessary to correct the payment units for the Rip
Rap and to create a bid price for the unexpected demolition material.
Attachments (list documents supporting change)i N/A
CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE CHANCE IN CONTRACT TIME
j Original Contract Pricer $134,881.31 Original Contract Timet September 30, 1993
Previous Change Orders No. _ to No.-:.,: $-0. Net Change from Previous Change Orders: 4
Contract Price Prior to this Change Orders Contract Time Prior to this Change Orden
$134,881.31 September 30, 1993
Net Increase (Decrease) of this Change Order: Net Increase (decrease) of Change Order: 40-
$2,650.00
Contract Price with all Approved Change Orders: Contract Time with Approved Change Ordent
J $137431.31 September 30, 1993
Recommended By: -�(�a%- Approved By:
Bret A. Weiss, PX ImTour Construction Co. i
tpproved Approved Date of Council Action —
By. By.
Public Works Director Adnunistrator
Council Agenda - 9/27/93
ti. Consideration of aporoval of plans and specifications and authorization to
Proceed for hide for Improvement Proiect 98.11C, chlorination and dechlorination
improvements to the Wastewater Treatment Plant. (J.S. )
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
OSM has completed the plans and specifications for the chlorination and dechlorination
system at the Wastewater Treatment Plant. We have included a copy of the plan sheet
which your agenda for your review. Should you require the entire documents, they are
available at City Hall.
Our deadline for the project is to have the systeros in operation during the month of October
1994, so that we can demonstrate to the MN Pollution Control Agency that we can
dechlorinate prior to the end of our permit in December of 1994. Since we do not chlorinate
after November 1, the October deadline is necessary. City staff and OSM have discussed
moving up the time table due to the necessity to chlorinate during the summer months of
1994. It would be very difficult to continue chlorination during the summer while the
construction is going on in the existing chlorine room. We therefore feel that it would be
in our best interest to move the timetable up for winter construction and a spring of 1994
start up. We therefore ask that the City Council approve the plans and specifications and
authorize advertisement for bids, contingent upon approval of the plans and specifications
by the MN Pollution Control Agency. This should allow us to he out for bids in November
or December, and to award the project around the first of the year. The anticipated
construction cost for the improvement is $51,000. In addition to the plan sheet, you will
also find a copy of a project estimate and schedule from OSM.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTION
1. The first alternative would be to approve the plans and specifications and authorize
advertisement for bids, contingent upon approval of the plans and specification by the
MN Pollution Control Agency.
2. The second alternative would be to wait until approval from the MN Pollution
Control Agency and at that time authorize advertisement for bids.
3. The third alternative would he to do nothing. If we choose this alternative, it is
doubtful that we would he able to obtain a new permit for our wastewater treatment
plant after October 1994.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Itis the recommendation of the Public Works Director and Professional Services Group that
the City Council approve the plans and specifications as outlined in Alternative 1, and
uuthorize advertisement for bids upon approval from the MN Pollution Control Agency.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of plan sheet for chlorination/dechlorination system; Project estimate and schedule
from OSM.
20
Sdwkn
as)&—=b1L
Attached are 3 sets of the final plans and specifications for the Chlorination/Dechlorination
Facilities and 15 copies of the demolition/modification plan as requested.
Based upon the final design, the estimated construction cost for the
Chlorination/Dechlorination Facilities is $51,000. Costs include estimates for contractor's
labor, materials, equipment, taxes, bonds, overhead and profit plus a contingency of 5
percent. Legal and engineering fees are not included in this estimate.
Preliminary conversations with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MiFCA) personnel
indicate plan review will take a maximum of 90 days. Review time may be less, depending
on MPCA workloads. Based upon the 90 days for MPCA review, we estimate the following
construction schedule:
11cm D=
1. Submit Plans and Specifications to MPCA September 26, 1993
2. Receive Approval from MPCA December 31, 1993
3. Advertise for Bids December 31, 1993
4. Award Bid January 24, 1994
5. Complete Construction March 31, 1994
In order to expedite this schedule, we could advertise for bids prior to receiving MPCA
approval. This would allow bids to be taken in late December or early January, and would
thus allow for an earlier completion date. If construction is not completed by March 1,
1994, an interim disinfection system would be required.
4+1 oppmvAwy cva)" //
300 Palk Place Cher
September 22, 1993
5 Way=
5n MN 55416-
617-595-5775
1.800-753-5775
FAX 595-5774
Mr. John Simola
Planners
City of Monticello
Surveyors
P.O. Box 1147
250 East Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362
Re: Chlorination/Dechlorination Facilities
City of Monticello
OSM Project No. 5133.00
Dear John:
Attached are 3 sets of the final plans and specifications for the Chlorination/Dechlorination
Facilities and 15 copies of the demolition/modification plan as requested.
Based upon the final design, the estimated construction cost for the
Chlorination/Dechlorination Facilities is $51,000. Costs include estimates for contractor's
labor, materials, equipment, taxes, bonds, overhead and profit plus a contingency of 5
percent. Legal and engineering fees are not included in this estimate.
Preliminary conversations with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MiFCA) personnel
indicate plan review will take a maximum of 90 days. Review time may be less, depending
on MPCA workloads. Based upon the 90 days for MPCA review, we estimate the following
construction schedule:
11cm D=
1. Submit Plans and Specifications to MPCA September 26, 1993
2. Receive Approval from MPCA December 31, 1993
3. Advertise for Bids December 31, 1993
4. Award Bid January 24, 1994
5. Complete Construction March 31, 1994
In order to expedite this schedule, we could advertise for bids prior to receiving MPCA
approval. This would allow bids to be taken in late December or early January, and would
thus allow for an earlier completion date. If construction is not completed by March 1,
1994, an interim disinfection system would be required.
4+1 oppmvAwy cva)" //
Mr. John Simola
City of Monticello
September 22, 1993
Page 2
We have enjoyed working with the City on this project and wish to thank all those who
participated. If you have any questions, please call me at 595-5607 or Don Esping at
595-5713.
Sincerely,
ORR-SCflE EN-MAYERON
& ASSOCIATES, INC
ZD. Peterson, P.E.
Project Manager
Enclosures
Don Esping - OSM
Bret Weiss - OSM
/run
r:\sisaav�avn.\�rn'xs\ovnvus
MOTES:
I. FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND
O.A. I Nc IME WHAT I ON.
2. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE REMOVAL
OF EAST ' I TON CHLORINE CYLINDERS
■ITN CHI ORI NE SUPPLIER.
S. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE ALL
Ea ISTINo CNLORINE EOUIPMENT IN THE
CHLORINE ROOM.
PLANT NATER TO REMAIN.
1. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 7'COtE
DRILL MOLE FW SHOVER WATER SERVICE
AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
5. CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE EXISTING
EAST WALL ELECTRICAL FIXTURES AND
COAD TUT AS DIRECTED eT ENGI"ER
FOR TAMA IT-SHC-II PLACELEN7
f. CON TRCL PAMCLS SHALL BE LOCATED
AS DIRECTED By ENGINEER.
1. PROVIDE NECCESSARY STRUCTURAL
SUPPORTS FOR PUL SATICN DAMPEIE RS
AND OTHER APPURTENANCES.
FOR PIPING CONiINUAIION�
SEE D.G. c,
"EE'"� \ ,— Er ISrING AIR INTAKE
�j Ti
REMOVE EXIST IMG PIPING
AS SMOWN ON SECTION I/P]
�•t// PFMOVL EXISTING
- / CHLORINATORS
�RELOVE , TON (AND INE CYLINDCR.
i EEANOTEC2 E AND APPjt[NAwCFS.
/ j//////j/
"HAD
c' ClG REMOVE eon OM c -o•
4
O FL;SI IMG 7.'Y e' DUCT
j ABs
DEMOLITION PLAN
SCALED, • 1'
C`:r C
CHLORINE CAS
SE SOR
ZZORI EX I
CHLORINE INJECTOR TOR RELOEL IS7IMG
CMI ORII I NAIDRS
EMERGENCY EYE WAS - P -ABS -2
WER BY
SHOOTHERS
EE NOTE .. M -ABS -2
SEE DETAIL G/P. ABS PULSAIIU+ DAMPENER
FOR FLOOR PENETRATia— P -ABS -1
FOR PIPING CONTINUATION M -ABS -1
SEE DWG c-1 — 2- SHC
FRT- ABS -
V I' " ABS tawnlucnw
SHC
P-SHC-7 Ll
2' SHC M-SHC-I
I.' SHC P-SHC-2
�p
2• SMC M-SHC-2I''"� +9' MA -1 2' SHC
SHC
P-SHC-3
M-SHC-3--
I':" SHC lz sHLI i-SHC-t
WICK CONNECT IT�P,I
CALi5n'AT iGN CFALuE../
!'X2' REDUCER= 1
SEE DETAIL E/P. ` SEE DETAIL F/PA FOR TANK TRANSITION PITTING
FOR TANK OUTLET 'FI X PI TNG
3' SHC
MODIFICATION PLAN
SCALE:',: T
2" SHC
O1I }� I a • v
FR -v ABS -1
l'Wv�.�' T -SMC - I
TR -AB$-, TSidj Tr l
P=A7B5-2
M -ABS -2
SECTION VIEW
SCUUM; . ,
PU SAt1oN DAMPCN{a IIYPI
•? SHC P -$NC -J P -$NC -2 P -SNC -1 �ISFf w0T1 ti
2
7 RV_
_$HC
M-SHC-J LSHC-M-SHC-I _
SHC-� o-
1 SHC ?' $Ni(
� I
-
�M_AHS I P ABS 2
IR-SHC
�IR-SFHc_.f --�-- �IR ABti Y - '---W yam' M �B$1J
�7" SNC 'IR-SN�2" SHC �7_ SHC ES �iR-ABS-ABS
�
M.I
THIS DRAWING HALF— SIZE P-3
BRC F'114ANCIAL SYSTEM
n8/19/99
10:03:52
Disbursement Journal
�IARRANT
DATE
VENOOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
CL
GENERAL CHECKING
35664
08/19/93
OLSON &. SONS ELECTRI
160
CHECK VOIDED
59.39CR
35604
08/19/93
OLSON & SONS ELECTRI
160
CHECK VOIDED
218•.9.7CR
35604
08/18/93
OLSON & SONS ELECTRI
100
CHECK VOIDED
31.5.1CR
35604
08/19/93
OLSON & SONS ELECTRI
160
CHECK VOIDED
4,0.87CR
35604
08/19/93
OL SON &• SONS ELECTRI
1.60
CHECK VOIDED
0.0&1S.61CR
6.367.24CR
SCF
35805
08/19/93
PLUMBERY-PURCELLIS P
251
CHECK VOIDED
2.59.95CR
35613
08/10/93
MN DEPART OF NATURAL
116
WATERCRAFT TITLE
58.00
3b9i4
06/19/93
MN DEPART OF NATURAL
118
WATER/SNOW/ATV REG
131.00
35615
08/10/93
HAVES/WI'LMA
295
INFO CENTER SALARY
03.50
35.815
08/19/93
NAYES/WILMA
285
INFO CENTER SALARY
27.50CR
66.00
+CF
35616
08/19/93
RIGDEWAY/JENNIFER
759
INFO CENTER SALARY
74.38
35616
08/19/93
RIGDEWAY/JENNIFER
750
INFO CENTER SALARY
21.88CR
52.50
*CF
.5617
08/19/93
BARTON SAND & GRAVEL
305
SANO/PARKS DEPT
48.11
35918
08/18/93
BROWN & CRIS. INC.
061
CONST COSTS/C HILL
23.924.00
85819
09/19/03
COMMUNICATION AUDITO
38
PAGER/FIRE DEPT
414.22
35020
08/19/93
HENRY & ASSOCIATES
$45
METER. VALVES/WATER
OE 401.60
35620
06/19/93
HENRY & ASSOCIATES
54.5
WATER UTILITY SUPPLIE 643.18
1.044.76
SCF
35621
08/10/03
MINNESOTA BLUEPRINT
.00311
BLUE PRINT MCH/PW INS 364.23
35622
08/19/93
OLSON & SONS ELECTRI
100
MTC OF FIRE DEPT BLO 59.39
35022
09/19/93
OLSON & SONS ELECTRI
160
LIFT STATION REPAIRS 218.87
35622
09/10/93
OLSON & SONS ELECTRI
160
BLO REP SUP/SHOP &
GAR 31.51
300.76
to
35623
08/19/93
PLUMBERY-PURCELL'S P
251
WATER LINE INSTALL/F1 259.95
35623
08/19/93
PLUMBERY-PURCEI,1-'S P
251
MISC MATER SUPPLIES 40.87
35623
08/18/93
PLUMBERY-PURCELL'S P
251
PLUMBING/WARMING HO 0,010.61
6.317.43
oCI
35624
09/10/93
RIVERSIDE OIL
496
GAS/STREET DEPT
963.11
35625
09/19/03
RYAN CONTRACTING 'INC
750
COST 1.U'STS/C HILLS'
45.441.70
(
`e5624
00/10/93
WEISIRICN/DUANr & CI
.90310
REFUND/RECYCLING BINS 9.12
ht NERAL
CHECKTN6
TOTAL
)2.516.30
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
08/24/93 13:25:45
-WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
3562-7 08/24/93 HENRY & ASSOCIA.TES
35627 08/24/93 HENRY & ASSOCIATES
3b628 08/24/93 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFIC
35629 08/.2h/93 MINNESOTA SAFETY COU
35620 08/24/93 MINNtSOTA SAFETY COU
35630 06/24/93 MN OEOART OF NATURAL
GENERAL CHECKING
Disbursement Journal
OESCRIPTION AMOUNT C
545 ANGLE METER VALVE/WAT •401.60
545 WATER UTILITY MTC SUP 658.38
1.057..98
85 GAS/FIRE DEPT 66.85
488 RIGHT TO KNOW S01INR R 50.00
4..88 AWAIR SEMINAR REG 57.0.00
620.00
118 WATERCRAFT/ATV/SNOW R 215.00
TOTAL 1.959.63
Rc
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
08/31/93 15:28:06
' WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
35181 08/31/93 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYEkON
35101 08/31/93 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
35311 08/31/83 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
35311 08131/93 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
35620 08/31/83 HENRY A ASSOCIATES
35620 08/31/93 HENRY & ASSOCIATES
35631 08/31/83 UNITED STATES CELLUL
35631 08/31/93 UNITED STATES CELLUL
35632 08/31/93 CELLULAR ONE
35633 08/31/83 HAYES/WILMA
35633 09/31/03 HAVES/WILMA
3S634 08/31/93 MN DEPART OF NATURAL
35635 08/31/93 MN DEPART OF NATURAL
GENERAL CHECKING
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLA
162 CORRECT COOING 603.00CR
162 CORRECT CODING 603.00
0.00 *CHE
162 CORRECT CODING 1.055.25CR
162 CORRECT COOING 1.055.25
0.00 *CHF
545 CHECK VOIDED 401.60CR
$45 CHECK VOIDED 643.16CR
1.044.76CR *CHE
758 CIVIL DEFENSE PHONE CH 48.37
756 FIRE DEPT PHONE CHARGES 0.64
50.01 *CHE
SS5 CIVIL DEFENSE PHONE CH 20.46
29S INFO CENTER SALARY 140.25
285 INFO CENTER SALARY 41.25CR
99.00 'CHF
116 WATERCRAFT TITLE 20.00
110 WATER/SNOW/ATV REG 303.00
TOTAL 543.20CR
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
08/31/93 13:50:45
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
35636 09/01/93 AMERICAN NATIONAL SA
35636 09/01/03 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA
35636 09/01/93 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA
35636 09/01/93 AMERICAN NATIONAL SA
35636 09/01/93 AMERICAN raATIONAL BA
35636 09/01/93 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA
35636 09/01/93 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA
35636 09/01/03 AMERICAN NATIONAL SA
35636 09/01/93 AME P.ICAN NATIONAL SA
35636 00/01/93 AMERICAN NATIONAL SA
35636 09/01/93 AMERICAN NAT I ONAL BA
35636 09/01/93 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA
35636 09/01/93 AMERICAN NATIONAL SA
35636 09/01/93 AMERICAN NATIONAL BA
35636 09/01/93 AMERICAN NATIONAL SA
35638 09/01/93 AMERICAN NATIONAL SA
35637 09/01/93 D R. K REFUSE RECYCLI
35638 09/01/93 DAVIS WATER EOUIPMEN
35639 09/01/93 GLASS HUT/'INE
35640 09/01/93 HERMES/JERRY
35641 09/01/93 K MART STORE
35642 09/01/93 LEGEND VALLEY PRODUC
35643 09/01/93 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO
35644 09/01/93 MONTICELLO SENIOR Cl
35645 09/01/93 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
35666 09/01/93 OUALITY LAWN MAINTEN
35647 09/01/93 SHUMAII/CAT11V
35646 09/01/93 SOLIDIFICATION. INC.
35649 00/01/93 SOUTHAM 13USINESS CUM
35650 09/01/93 WATEP.PRO SUPPLIES CO
35651 09/01/93 WRIGHT COUNTY AUUIr0
35651 09/01/93 WRIGHT COUNTY AUOI10
35851 00/01/03 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO
35651 09/01/93 WR1GH1COUNTY AUDI10
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT C
7 AGENT FEES/1981 GO BD 176.16
7 AGENT FEES/1980 GO BO 180.45
7 AGENT FEES/19908 GO B 190.32
7 AGENT FEES/NAWCO GO B 202.79
7 AGENT FEES/CONST 5 GO 176.45
7 AGENT FEES/VEIr GO BD 176.74
7 AGENT FEES/INT SEW GO 196.77
1 AGt:Nl' 1FtE5/1986 GO 8 214.01
7 AGENT FEES/WATER GO 8 184.93
1 AGENT FEES/1988-1 GO 178.10
7 AGENT FEES/ELDERLY GO 261.45
7 AGENT FEES/1090C GO B 187.24
7 AGENT FEES/1990D GO B 2.08.95
7 AGENT FEES/1991A GO B 1 80. 24
7 AGENT FEES/1992A GO 8 175.29
7 AGENT FEES/F 11ALL GO B 78.95
2.968.93
611 RECYCLING CONTRACT/ 2.353.40
290 SUPPLIES/C HILLS 111 83.75
66 FRONT SIDELIGHT/DOOR/ 308.61
81 LIBRARY CLEANING CONT 227.50
460 GARBAGE CAN/CITY HALL 10.62
769 BOOS/SEWER COLLECTI 1.142.04
185 ANIMAL CONTROL CONT 1.100.00
139 MONTHLY CONTRACT PV 2.833.33
175 WW' -P CONTRACT PVMT 30.421.58
319 MOWING CHARGES 856.00
191 MILEAGE EXPENSE 16.52
633 SEWER IELEVISING/C HI 980.00
644 HART STORM SEWER BIDS 236.43
070 WATER DEPT SUPPLIES 41?.96
210 PROPERTY TAXES/NRA 44.87
219 PROPEkl V TAXES/COLE P 611. 77
219 PROPERTY TAXES/WWTP R 315.65
210 PROPERTY TAXES/IXI 1 48.70
'C
0
EIRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
08/31/03 13:50:45
l WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
35651 09/01/93 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO
35052 08/01/93 WRIGHT COUNTY DEPT 0
35653 00/01/93 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP
GENERAL CHECKING
14
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLo
219 PROPERTY TAXES/KRAM 2.165.98
3.247.67 ECHE
275 W CTY MAPS FOR RESALE 37.44
512 UTILITIES 8.63
TOTAL 47.247.71
A
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
t 09/09/93 16:00:05
`VARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
35654 09/08/93 U.S. POSTMASTER
35655 09/08/03 MN DEPAkT OF NATURAL
15058 09/08/93 MN OEPAP.T OF NATURAL
AENERAL CHECKING,
C
Oisburser.ent Journal
DESCRIPTIOtI AMOUNT CLI
210 POSTAGE/CITY HALL 1.500.00
118 WATERCRAFT TITLE 106.00
118 WATER/SNOW/ATV REC 248.00
TOTAL 1.854.00
•
ERC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
09/00/93 15:30:25
�-�ARRAuT DAZE V•ENOOR
GiNERAL CHECKING
35657 09/09/93 AME GROUP
3565E 09/09/93 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
35658 09/09'/93 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
35650 00/09/03 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
39656 09/09/93 BRIDGEWATER TELEP4ON
35659 09/00/93 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
SbtfKtl UV/,UO/9i tJRiULkWA'IEK IELEPHON
35650 09/09/93 BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
35656 09/09/93 BRIDGEWATER. TELEPHON
3SU59 00/09/93 BRIDGEWATER rtLEPHUN
35659 09/09/93 BRTDGF.WAIER TELEPHON
15650 05/09/93 COPY OUPLCATI-NG PA00
75660 09/09/93 FEeo wE CONTROLS. I
456'1I 09/09/83 GOPHER 139 A i t ONE CAI.
16662 09/09/03 HOGLUND COACH LINES
1116:' 09/09/0 J M AIL COa-ANY
3'1664 09/09/33 KEN ANOERSON TRUCK0
35665 00/09/63 KlcAEN.EP/WANOA
356o6 00/00/03 LUKACI9/JOHN
9+16'.0 09/09/93 LUKACH/JOHN
34666 09/09/93 LUXACH/JOHN
391.46 09/09/93 IUKAGVofJO6::+
111661 0!1/09/93 MIDWEST (PAS %,tlttPArJY
.15661 041/U9/93 Mi0W1:S7 6AS COMPANY
�ti6G7
09/0y/93 MIDWk$7 GAS COMPANY
�SGU7 04/UO/q3 MTOWCST aA!; COMPANY
ISGRO (19/00/9) O'Nl:fl.l /.1'r'Fl
:,'it, VS 01:/09/63
PAt,!' L It:p
.9it6G9 09/09/0�
VA'•it 1. IN
sY.I,J (19/00/03
l'A1iE L10
C1'i f. c.7 ni1/0 1/'1.l
VA(,i: 1. 1 H
;1 9 !,:I/U9/9i
PA- ,F LINri
111;iU,r!,J
PAI,-,- 1.71!
•,',1,1,,3 09/09,'1:
PA(;I: I IPA
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLA
8 STREET SUPPLIES 69.10
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
62.75
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
69.96
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
123.73
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
24.34
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
131.62
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
45.92
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
20.75
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
91.91
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
b9.76
24
TELEPHONE.CHARGES
666.12
1.275.86 +CHF
41
COPY MCH MTC/LIBRARY
50.40
56
PROF SERVICES/WATER
OE 63.00
09
PROF SERVICESIWATER
II 235.50 •
493
H:ARTLAN9 EXPRESS C
5.119.81
65
OIL/SIREET DEPT
t99.74
607
PROF SERVICES/ANIMAL
106.50
A'5G
REIMS/COLLEGE COI,:RSE
110.79
311
MILEAUE EXPENSE
72.07
3907
MILEAGE ESPCNSE
?4.29
327
MILEAGE EXPFtJ Ai
24.29
3507
MILEAGE EXPENSE
?4.29
145.74 +CHI
115
UTILITIES
9.`;6
115
UTILITIES
3.91
115
UTILITIES
70.10
119
UTILITI-25
J). 12
74.37 t1 F1-
141
T4AVi L !XPFN!
80.00
/03
GA4ER CHA1661',
4?.60
791
:)At,; -R iHA:li'3
21.111
703
PAC' EP LHANI,EL
?4.!'10
/118
!'At,h.k LNA•',r,
it 1. J1.
1C1
C,At:`F CH'A�01,
^'.:JO
103
VA6FR lHA't;I:S
?1.;,,
7t'3
9Atri:l: I HAWk, F1•
?1.30
7,1.1
•i AI I CHAQwh ,
•!1.: U
BRC FIttANCIKL SYSTEM
09/00/93 15:38:25
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
35670 09/09/93 SIMONSON LUMBER. COMP
35070 09/09/93 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP
35670 09/09/93 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP
35670 09/09/93 SIMONSON L-W!%EP. COMP
:5610 09/09/03 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP
35670 09/0£/83 SIMMSON LUMBER COMP
35670 09/t)9/03 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP
35670 0009193 SIMONSON LUVBEP. COMP
35671 09/09/93 TAVLOP LAND SURVEYOR
35872 09/09/93 UNOCAL
35673 09/09/93 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVA
35613 00/09/93 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVA
GENERAL CHECKING
C
Oichursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT C.
194.90
109 BLD REP SUP/PARXS 205.10
193 MISC SUPPLIES/STREETS 13.16
193 MISC SUPPLIES/PARKS 31.46
193 BLD MTC/SENIOR CIT BLD 8.52
193 CORRECT CODING ?8.89CR
103 SUPPLIES/7TH ST CXTENG 20.12
193 SUPDLIES/CTV RD 75 IMP 21.83
193 REPAIRS/KRAMER RENTAL 72.37
351.87
203 BLUE PRINTS PRINTED 71.50
219 GAS/FIRE DEPT 31.86
524 GARBAGE CONTRACT 8,278.22
5?4 SALES TAX/GARBAGE CON 532.?.1
6.810.43
TOTAL 11,002.13
Oct
C:
Oct •
E:RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
09/16/93 11:14:45
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
35674 09/15/93 MN DEPT OF TRADE & E
35615 09/15/93 MN DEPT OF TRADE A E
35675 09/15/93 MN DEPT OF TRAOE Fi E
35675 09/15/93 MN DEPT OF TRADE & E
35676 09/15/93 11N i TOG RFNTAL SE:V Ii -
35676
{35676 09/15/93 UNI TOG RE1.1'AL SERVIC
35676 00/15/93 UNITOG RENTAL SERVIC
35676 09/15/93 UNITOG RENTAL SERVIC
35676 09/15/93 UNI'fOG RENTAL SERVIC
35676 09/15/93 UNITOG RENTAL SERVIC
35677 09/15/93 NORTHERN STAPES POWE
35677 09/15/93 NORT14ERN STATES POWE
35677 09/15/93 NORTHERN STATES POWE
35677 09/15/93 NORTHERN STATES POWE
35677 09/15/93 NORTHERN STATES POWE
35677 00/15/93 NORTHERN STATES POWE
35677 09/15/93 NORTHERN STATES POWE
35677 09/15/93 NORTHERN STATES POWE
35677 09/15/93 NORTHERN SIAIES POWE
35671 00/15/93 NORTHERN STATES POWE
35678 09/15/93 VALUE PLUS 140ME5
35679 09/15/93 KJELLSERGS PAPK
35670 09/1S/93 KJELLBERGS PARK
35680 00/15/93 WESTSIDE PARK
35681 09/15/93 MN DEPART OF NAIURAI
35682 09/16/93 ANDERSON A ASSOCIATE
35683 09/16/93 ARA CORY REFRESHMENT
35604 00/16/93 ASSOCIATED VETERINAR
35605 09/16/93 BERGSTROM EROS. INC.
35685 09/16/93 BERGSTROM BROS. INC.
35606 09/16i93 RIFFS. INC.
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
359 REG FEE/OLLIE K 165.00
359 WARMING HOUSE/PAINT 184.98
359 BLO REPAIR SUP/PARKS 120.98
359
STREET SUPPLIES
10.31
316.17
? 1 t
UNIFGF:M
RENTAL
17. 70
211
UNIFORM
RENTAL
35.40
211
UNIFORM
RENTAL
17.70
211
UNIFORM
RENTAL
17.70
211
UNIFORM
RENTAL
68.72
211
UNIFORM
RENTAL
68.71
225.93
148 UTILITIES 2.740.53
148 UTILITIES 290.94
148 UTILITIES 4.534.60
148 UTILITIES 75.90
148 UTILITIES 807.31
148 UTILITIES 14.65
148 UTILITIES 439.69
148 UTILITIES 249.24
148 U11L11']ES 613.15
148 UTILITIES 915.17
10.681.18
.90314 REIMS/SEWER A WATER 7.00
.9031? RECYCLING 8114 REIMS 9.17
.00312 PENALTY REIMS 0.64
9.70
.90313 REIMS/SEWER A WATER 3.17
118 WATERCRAFI/SNOW/ATV R 436.00
10 STREET SIGNS 141.30
408 CI1V HALL SUPPLIES 42.00
683 ANIMAL CONTROL SUPPLI 165.45
?1 EQUIP REPAIR PARIS/STR 48.94
21 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/PAR 68.02
116.90
395 LATRINE RENTALS/PARKS 22.64
CL
*CH
9CH
+CH
.CH
0 CII
FRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
09/16/93 11:14:45
WAP.RANT DATE VENOOP.
GENERAL CHECKING
35687 09/16/93 BRAUN INTERTEC ENV1O
35688 09/16/03 BRENTESON CONSTRUCTI
35669 09/16/93 CENTRAL MCGOWAN. INC
35690 00/16/93 COAST TO COAST
35690 09/16/93 COAST TO COAST
35690 09/16/93 COAST TO COAST
35690 09/16/93 COAST 10 COAST
35690 09/16/93 COAST TO COAST
35090 09/16/93 COAST TO COAST
35690 09/16/93 COAST TO COAST
35690 09/16/93 COAST TO COAST
35600 00/16/93 COAST TO COAST
35690 09/16/93 COAST TO COAST
35690 00/16/93 COAST TO COAST
35691 00/16/03 COMPRESS ALP &. EGUIP
35692 09/10/93 CUL LIGAN
35603 09/16/93 DAVIS WATER EOUIPMEN
35694 09/16/93 ORAYN A PAINT INC,
35605 09/16/93 OYNA SYSTEMS
35695 09/10/93 DYNA SYSTEMS
35690 09/16/93 ELK RIVIR CONCRETE P
35697 09/16/93 FLEXIBLE TOOL COMPAN
35696 09/16/93 FLICKER'S T.V. & APP
35509 09/1G/n1 rENEP.AL RENTAL. CENTE
35699 09/16/93 GENERAL RENTAL CENTE
35700 09/16/93 GLASS HU1/1'HE
35101 09/16/93 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
3570; 09/16/93 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
35101 09/16/93 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
f 15701 00/10/93 CARRY'$ AU10 SUPPLY
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CL
638 ENG FEES/HART STORM S 108.50
435 CONST COSTS/MEAD OA 2.190.20
30 SHOP & GARAGE SUPPLIES 30.12
35 CITY HALL SUPPLIES 15.61
35 'PARK, SUPPLIES 50.59
35 BLD REPAIR SUP/PARKS 17.21
35 LIBRARY SUPPLIES 1.01
35 CLEANING SUP/LIBRARY 19.54
35 WATER. DEPT SUPPLIES 56.86
35 SHOP & GARAGE SUPPLIES 35.36
35 STREET SUPPLIES 23.16
35 SEWER COLL SUPPLIES 7.54
35 KRAMER RENTAL REPAIRS 11.66
35 PW INSPECTION SUPPLIES 23.28
7G1.84
356 COMPRESSOR MTC AGPMT/ 305.00
753 WATER SOFTNEP. CHGS/REN 22.05
290 UTILITY MTC SUP/WATER 918.33
770 CITY HALL PAINTING CH 025.00
50 SHOP & GARAGE SUPPLIES 81.36
50 GRINDING STONE KlT/SH 164.70
246.06
S61 MEAD OAK/BRIAR OAK 3.479.01
50 BALL VALVE/SEWER COLI. 133.02
60 NEW T V/FIRE DEPT500.74
b4 RENTAL CHGS/PARKS 65.90
64 PARKS SUPPLIES 159.16
225.06
GG NEW LOCK/LIBRARY 13.85
78 STREET SUPPLIES 4.28
76 WATER MTC SUPPLIES 13.56
18 WATER SUPPLIES 58.04
78 FIRE DEPT SUPPLIES 14.25
90.15
+CH
•CH
oCH
VC1-
rfli
6RC fINANCIAL SYSTEM
09/16/93 11:14:45
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
35702 09/16/93 HENRY & ASSOCIATES
35702 09/16/93 HENRY & ASSOCIATES
35703 09/16/93 HERMES/JERRY
35704 09/10/93 INDUSTRIAL MAINT. SU
35705 09/16/93 KOVICH/PATRICA
35706 09/16/93 KRAMSER & ASSOCIATES
35707 09/16/93 LEAGUE. OF MN CITIES
35707 09/10/93 LEAGUE OF 1414 CITIES
35701 09/16/93 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
35707 09/16/93 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
35708 09/16/93 M & P TRANSPORI, INC
35709 09/16/93 MARTIE'S FARM SERVIC
i
35710 09/16/93 MAUS FOODS
35110 09/16/93 MAUS FOODS
35710 09/16/93 MAUS FOODS
35710 00/16/93 MAUS FOODS
35710 09/16/93 MAUS FOODS
35110 09/16/93 MAUS FOODS
35711 09/16/93 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO
35712 09/10/93 MONIICELLO OFFICE PR
35712 00/16/93 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR
35713 09/16/93 MONTICELLO PRINTING
35713 09/16/93 MONTICELLO PRIN1ING
35714 09/16/93 MONTICELLO TIMES
35114 09/16/03 MONTICELLO TIMES
35714 09/10/93 MONIICELLO TIMES
35114 00/16/03 MONTICELLO TIMES
35714 09/16/93 MONTICELLO TIMES
35114 09/16/03 MONTICELLO TIMES
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Cl
545 WATER DEPT SUPPLIES 57.94
545 STREET PATCH MATERIAL 453.24
511.18 !CI
81 LIBRARY CLEANING CONT 227.50
514 SHOP & GARAGE SUPPLIE 397.81
287 MILEAGE EXPENSE 22.83
888 ASSESSING CONTRACT 1.792.10
243 WORKER'S COMP INSU 16.817.00
243 INSURANCE PREM/FIRE 7.325.00
243 INSURANCE PREM/WATE 3.724.00
243 INSURANCE PREM/SEWER 408.00
28.214.00
205 ROCKS & SANO/PARKS OE 348.98
107 STREET SUPPLIES 59.64
108 CITY HALL SUPPLIES 79.28
108 LIBRARY SUPPLIES 33.68
106 LIBRARY CLEANIN SUP 33.69
108 CHEMICALS/WATER DEPT 8.31
108 WATER DEPT SUPPLIES 25.30
108 SHOP R GARAGE SUPPLIES 25.24
705.50
185 ANIMAL CONTROL CONT 1.100.00
136 CITY HALL OFFICE SUP 399.48
136 PW I11SPF.0 OFFICE SUP 22.11
421.G5
131 BUS TICKETS PRINTED 162.84
137 FIN VERIFIED ACC1 FORM 85.2.0
248.04
140 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 296.72
140 BUILDING PERMIT INFORM 67.20
140 LEGAL PUBLICATIONS 552.05
140 HART BLVD STORM SEWER 83.04
140 LIBRARY/1992 TIMES 110 183.00
140 GARBAGE AD INFOR/JULY 36.00
1.Y1B.01
+CI
OCI
'CI
4C1
+CI
6RC :INANCIAL SYSTEM
09/16/93 11:14:45
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
35715 09/16/93 MOON MOTOR SALES. IN
35115 09/16/03 MOON MOrOR SALES. IPA
35715 09/16/93 MOON MOIOR SALES. 114
35716 09/10/93 14ATIONAL BUSHING PAR
35716 09/16/93 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
35716 09/16/93 NATIONAL BUSHING VAR
35715 09/16/93 NATIONAL ELLISHING, PAR
35716 09/16/93 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
35716 09/16/93 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
35716 09/16/93 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
35716 09/16/03 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
35716 09/16/93 NATIONAL BUSI-1114G PAR
35716 09/16/93 NATIONAL BUSHING; PAR
35717 09/16/03 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
35717 09/16/93 URk-SCMELE14-MAYERON
35717 09/16/03 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
35717 09/16/93 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
35718 09/16/93 PREUSSE'S CLEANING S
35718 09/16/93 PREUSSE'S CLEANING S
35719 00/16/93 SIMPLE)[ rIME RECOROE
35720 09/16/93 SPECTRUM SUPPLY CO.
35121 09/16/03 TOOD & CO.. INC./MIC
357?1 09/16/93 1000 & CO.. INC./MIC
35722 09/16/53 U t.11l{+ INILKNAIIUNAL
35723 09/16/03 VOSS ELECTRIC SUPPLY
35724 09/10/93 WRIGHT COUNTY AUOITO
3572.4 00/16/03 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO
357?5 00/16/03 Y.M.C.A. OF MINNEAPO
GENERAL CHECKING
D1sbu _�-ment Journal
DESCRIP110N AMOUNT CL.
142 VEH REPAIR PAP,TS/PARKS 53.25
142 MISC SUPPLIES/PARKS 35.09
142 SHADE TREE SUPPLIES 4.99
93.33
144 STREET SUPPLIES 16.12
144 SEWER COLL SUPPLIES 10.80
144 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/STR 88.19
144 FIRE DEPT SUPPLIES 8.16
144 SHOP & GARAGE SUPPLIES 25.53
144 VEH REPAIR PARTS/STRT 102.05
144 EQUIP REP PARTS/PARKS 84.93
144 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/WAT 68.63
144 WATER UTILITY MTC SUP 12.94
144 WATER SUPPLIES 15.83
433.76
162 ENG FEES/OIGESTER W 4.129.75
162 ENG FEES/CARO HILLS 7.608.32
162 ENG FEES/STORM SEWE 1.146.38
162 MISC ENG FEES 3.453.33
16.397.18
173 FIRE HALL CLEANING CON 50.00
173 CIrV HALL CLEANING CO 400.00
450.00
376 MTC AGRMr/c HALL CLOC 139.75
498 PARK SUPPLIES 184.96
393 PLOW BLADE/SNOW R ICE 259.21
393 STREET SUPPLIES 768.99
528.20
/y4 PUSIA(,t/SEWER COLL e.ib
400 rRAFFIC LIGHT BULBS 107.35
219 SHERIFF'S CONTRACT 21,793.00
210 ADO'L LANDFILL CHG 13,376.70
35,169.70
224 SEPT CONTRACT PAYMENT 625.00
TOTAL 110.430.94
OCH
ICH
,CH
ICH
+CH
OCH
Ir
Pi;C FINANCIAL SYSTEM
11
08/31/03
IS:28:29
Disbursement Journal
Al
WARPAN T
DAIE
VENOOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
LIQUOR FUND
17097
00/30/93
PHILLIPS
Z, SONS CO/E
800037
WINE PURCHASE
257.50
17092
08/30/93
PHILLIPS
& SONS CO/E
800037
LIQUOR PURCHASE
1.483.05
1.740.55 1,
17093
08/30/93
LEE MEDICAL
SERVICE
800054
LIQUOR STORE SUPPLIES
49.56
17094
08/30/93
EAGLE WINE
COMPANY
600012
WINE PURCHASE
1,320.20
17095
08/30/93
GRIGGS.
COOPER & COM
800018
LIQUOR PURCHASE
1.589.28
1/09b
08/30/93
PAuSTIS
& SONS
600103
WINE PURCHASE
50.00
11097
08/30/93
PHILLIPS
& SONS CO/E
800037
WINE PURHCASF.
452.10
17097
08/30/93
PHILLIPS
& SONS CO/E
800037
LIQUOR PURCHASE
813.89
1.265.39 +
17098
08/30/93
QUALITY
W114E & SPIRI
800040
MISC MIXES FOR
RESALE 35.45
17008
08/30/03
QUALITY
WINE & SPIRI
800040
LIQUOR PURCHASE
2.618.67
17098
08/30/93
QUALITY
WINE € SP1RI
800040
WINE PURCHASE
91.76
2.745.88
17099
08/30/93
JOHNSON
BROS WHOLESA
90002.2
WINE PURCHASE
2.300.88
17099
08/30/03
.1O1INSON
BROS WHOLESA
800022
LIQUOR PURCHASE
1,475.86
3.776.74
LIQUOR FUND
TOTAL
12.538.20
Ir
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
09/08/93 13:35:24 Disbursement Journal
C" WARRANT DATE VENOOR DESCRIPTION AMOUI4T
LIQUOR FUND
17100 U8/08/93 9ERttICK'S PEPSI LOLA 800001 CPtDIT FROM JULY 1.00CR
171110 09/08/93 SERNICK'S PEPSI COLA $00001 POP PURCHASE 193.80
192.90 +
17101 09/118/93 BRIDGEWATER TEI.FPHON 800002 PHONE CHARGES 106.58
17102 08/08/£3 COAST TO COAST 800004 E'UPPLIES 39.94
17103 09/08/93 DAHLHEIMER 03SfpI3LIT 800000 BEER PURCHASE 21.3;4.43
17103 09/09/93 OAHLHEINEP 07STRIBUT 807009 NON ALCOHOLIC BEER 660.35
21.974.73
17164 09/06/93 OAVNOR HAMC0 800085 DISC OPEPATING SUPPLI 104.44
17105 01)/08/93 DAY OISTRIBU(ING COM 800010 EE R PURCHASE 603.15
17105 09/06/93 DAY DISiR16UT1rt.: COM 900010 NON ALCOHOLIC BEEP I&.85
$22.10
17106 09/08/93 GIC): WHOLESALE CO.. 800011 6EtER PURCHASE 2.066.40
17106 00/08/93 DICK WHOLESALE CO.. 800011 L6(JOUR STORE SUPPLIES 43.60
2.IOV.00 ;
17107 00/08/93 FLESr,H'S PAPER SERVI 800116 PAPER SA%$ 6?.15
17109 09/08/93 A L• V t-ERVICE 000129 RUGS/MIC OF BLU ?.49
17109 09/09/0) GRI(iGS. COONFR 8 COM 800010 LIQUOR PURCHASE 3.275.60
11109 09/08/93 GRIGGw. C'J')PER € COM 600018 MIkES FOR RESALE 107.87
3.383.47 +
11110 09/08/03 GRASSLEIN BEVERAGF L 000010 k1E;:k PURCHASE 12.400.05
17110 09/03/01 HRUSSLF IN Ct VERA6E I 000019 NUN 41.('OHGLIC Pt;FR 201.30
12.010.35
11111 U'1/118/fi3 HUmF .n Irr 100136 J0I11= POR Gt:;AI.E ri9.71)
1: I1,.' '19/;)0/59 iii�A,. A:'iVF�'i;:;Ittr.. .901?U S►.�T (:LASSkS ffJF 6ct'.A 1137l.0Lf
1711? 1----FAL AOV;kTI�lt+f 800'4J MOR rF..IAf.F. 147.00
.00
1111) 09/08/03 JULIE CAt+OY A rCvF1ACCQ 000VI FL)I+ .1::AL 131.91
11113 091U', o93 JUDE CAN -V F• 't -v ACCO O(-0021 LJ(JUD12 STORE SUPPLTk, 1.:A.4L
11114 C..^,ff(:/93 MAli', FUU"', 0000%7 MISC S,UPPLIF', Edo
C 17115 Ofi/t)0/93 MIIfWf:!;T Fo-0 F- 1'EVF.R 300154 RF;(i Fr.F/:;I'MINAN 90,00
Oka BINANCL.AL SYSTEM
.i
Ot1YO@119D 13:35:?A:
Q'iabur'gemenE Journal
`WAOINNT
9AIE
VENDOR.
OEgGRIPTioN
AMOWY
LIQUOR F-UND
17.716
09/08'/,83
MI-OWES--T SAS .COMPANY
800028
-UTILITIES
10:83
17117
09/06/93
MN BAR SUPPLV
800930
COOLERS FOR RESALE
213s88
171.18
09/08/93
'MN DEPARTMENT OF R'E^V
SO.000
SALES TAX VOR AUGU
'11.828,26.
17110
09/08/93
MONTZCELLO TIMES
'80003'2'
AOVERTIS;NG
108.70
17120
09/06/93
NORTHERN STATES POWE
80003'5
UTILITIES
1,229.41
97121
00/09'!`93
OLSON• & SONS-- ELECFRI
000036
REPAIRS• TO BLD
131.41
17121
09/08/93
OLSON & SON$ ELECTRI
800036
LAMP REPLAQE'MENT
7.92
119.33 •..
17122
09/08'/93
PAUSTIS & SONS
800103
WINE PURCHASE.
744.72
11123
08/08/93
PURICLEAN
800153
MIX FOR RESALE
131.4.0
11124
W06/84d
QUALITY WINE & SPIP.I
'800040
MlNE9 FOR Wt SALE
1194.12
1'7124
00/09/93
9UALITY WINE & SPIRI
806h O
LIQUOR PURCHASE
1.913.80
11124
09/09/93
QUAi.,IT9 WINE & SAIRI
600040
WINE PURCHASE
891.41
2.909.33
17125
Q9-/08/93
RC50"S ICE COMPANY
800041
ICE PURCHASE
897.76
17126.OV.001
3
SERVICE SAL-CS CORPOR
600042
MLSC SUPPLIES
??.DO
17127
08/'08/03
$T. CLOUD RESTAURANT
800040
MI6C ITEMS FOR RESALE 111.60
17'121
09/08/01
ST.•CLOUD RESTAURANT
900045
CLEANIAG SUPPLIES
112.41
224.01 •
1Ti20
09/08/O8
THORPE D19TRIBUTIN6
800048
BEER PURCHASE
22.421.15
191.,28.0.8/08193
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
800048
NON ALCOHOLIC B&ER
450.30
22.871.45
19-120
-03/00/68
V2KINO BOiA—COLA 1605
880051
-P1iP PURCHASE
458:00
17110
00/08/03
WRIGHT COUNTY TREAS/
900134
'TAXES/SIDEWALK IMP
PRO 02.38
11131
00/00/83
7.EE MEDICAL PERVIV
800054
LIQUOR 5TORE SUPPLIES 49.56
LIQUOR FUND
TOTAL
03.099.13
C
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
09/15/93 15:49:02
1
Disbursement Journal
WARRANT
DATE
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
LIQUOR FUND
17132
09/15/93
AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS
800156
DOORBELL INSTALLATION
68.50
17132
09/15/93
AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS
800156
TELEPHONE
190.05
258.55 +
17133
09/15/93
COAST TO COAST
800004
BLD MTC SUPPLIES
31.75
17134
09/15/93
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE I
800019
BEER PURCHASE
6.254.45
17134
09/15/93
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE 1800019
NON ALCOHOLIC BEER
35.10
6,289.55 •
17135
09/15/93
GTE DIRECTORIES SERV
800126
ADVERTISING
32.00
17130
09/15/93
HENRY & ASSOCIATES
800155
VALVE & CONNECTORS
163.32
11137
09/15/93
IDEAL ADVERTISING
800128
FROSTED SHOT GLASSES 182.00
17138
09/15/93
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA
800022
LIQUOR PURCHASE
633.76
17138
09/15/93
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA
800022
WINE PURCHASE
2.218.85
2,852.41
17130
09/15/93
LIEFERT TRUCKING
800025
FREIGHT CHARGES
531.19
17140
09/15/93
PHILLIPS & SONS CO/E
800037
LIQUOR PURCHASE
703.56
17140
09/15/93
PHILLIPS & SONS CO/E
800031
WINE PURCHASE
630.08
1,333.64 •
17141
09/15/93
TRI STAR
800142
CIG LIGHTERS FOR RESA 147.00
17142
09/15/93
U S WEST COMMUNICATI
800093
ADVERTISING
24.00
17143
00/15/93
VOSS ELECTRIC SUPPLY
800070
LIGHT BULBS
41.54
LIQUOR FUND
TOTAL
11,887.55
INFORMATIONAL ITEM
September 27, 1893
Review of proposed capital outlay items for the 1994 budget. (R.W.)
At the recent budget workshop, the Council agreed to adopt the preliminary
maximum tax levy for 1994 that would be 55k higher than the 1993 amount or up to
a maximum of $2,652,527.
Included in the proposed tax levy amount, the Council was provided with a
preliminary 1994 capital outlay item list. The list (a copy of which is attached) is
based on the assumption of the 5"A, increase in the levy for next year. Except for a
few additional changes that were made under Finance, Deputy Registrar, and
Administration totaling approximately $1,925, the capital outlay items are essentially
the same as those listed in the work sheets provided for the budget meeting.
In preparation for our next budget review session prior to the actual public hearing
in early December, -I would like each of the Councilmembers to again look at the
capital outlay list and mark any expenditures proposed that you may feel are
unnecessary or should not be hudgeted for in 1994. If you do not have any specific
problems with any of the items as proposed, that is fine also and they will continue
to he included in our discussions and the proposed budget for next year. If anyone
has items listed that you would like to see removed, circle the item and let me know
so that 1 can make the adjustments in the budget work sheets for our next meeting.
Possibly if we have it short meeting on Monday night, the Council may want to spend
a few minutes at the end of the session to briefly discuss the capital outlay items.
CAPOUT.LIS: 9P24/93 Page 1
1894 CAPITAL OUTLAY
FUNDING
JEPARTMENT
AMOUNT
SOURCE
Parks
1.
Outlot A improvements in Meadow Oak:
General Fund
A. 2 ballfields
$ 24,000
(Parks Dept.)
B. 1 soccer field
$ 6,000
C. 1 storage building
1 500
$ 31,500
Add 30% to 40'X, if installation by others.
2.
3 basketball courts. Add 50% if installation by others
$ 7,500
3.
Demolish old community building in West Bridge Park
$ 3,500
and sod area
4.
Par West Park improvements, playground and backstop.
$ 4,500
Installation by City
fi.
Meadow Oak, repair ur replace pathways
$ 15,(1(10
1
Refurbish and install old bridge lighting
$ 3,500
7.
Picnic tables
$ 31000
8.
Cemetery fence, 6-1t chain link
$ 9,500
9.
Trail system 1STEA
$ 95,000
Capital Outlay
10.
One 11) string trimmer N.O.
$ 350
General Fund
Water Dennrt.ment
1.
Fence water tank site (except west side)
$ 6,500
Water Fund
2.
Isxpansion of alarm channels from ]6 to 32
$ 2,500
Water Fund
3.
1{epaint old water lower and install fall safe device
Open de-
Water Reservoir
pending on
Const. Fund
type or
paint
($15.000-
$65'oo0 )
n
41
CAPOUT.LIS: 9P24/93 Page 1
City Hall
1.
Mower replacement
$ 3,000
General Fund
2.
Air conditioner enclosure replacement (treated)
$ 2,000
General Fund
3.
Snowblower replacement
$ 1,400
General Fund
4.
Brick sealing and repair
$ 10,000
General Fund
5.
Chairs
$ 2,500
General Fund
6.
Conference table
$ 1,000
General Fund
Public Works
1.
Phase 11, public works facility, (includes downsized
$380,000
Liquor Fund?
sand salt storage)
Streets
1.
Replace '78 Int'I plow truck, $48,000 - $7,000 trade =
$ 41,000
General Fund
(Street Dept.)
2.
Seulc►at project
$ 20,000
` J.
1 additional pickup, 4 x 4
$ 15,000
4.
Repair 7th Street, Pine -Cedar
$ 20,000
5.
Realign Cedar at Oakwood Drive
$ 20,000
Snow & Ice
1.
New plow wing and sander
$ 14,000
General Fund
(Snow/Ice Dept.)
W WTP
1.
2nd stage digester cover replacement & piping
$200,000
Water Reservoir
modifications
Const. Fund
2.
Sludge storage tank cover replacement with fixed
$165,000
Bond?
cover (assume worst case)
3.
Chlorination -dechlorination
$ 61,700
Capital Outlay
4.
r
M
Facilities planning study
$ 25,000
Sewer Access
CAPOUT.LIS: 9/24/93
Pop 2
Sanitary Sewer Collection Svstem
1. Bypass pump and hoses to run on existing emergency
$
2,800
Sewer Fund
generator (3 HP/300 GPM)
2. Spare alarm transmitter and receiver
$
1,200
Sewer Fund
3. Replace VCR slo mo & freeze frame
$
400
Sewer Fund
4. Reserve for interceptor sewer extension (2nd year)
$
60,000-
Capital Outlay
Shun & Garaee
1. Floor lift hoist for trucks, 30,000#, 4-post, 5 1/2 ft lift
$
9,500
General Fund
(Shop Dept.)
2. Arc welder upgrade to handle arc & heliarc for
$
2,400
General Fund
welding aluminum
(Shop Dept.)
SlAirw Sewer
1. Meadow Oak pond outlet to the Mississippi
$290,000
Bond?
Tree Denart.ment
t. Chainsaw
$
fit#)
Tree Fund
Public Works - Admin. & Ener
1. Additional filing space, upgrade to city hall system
$
1,500
General Fund
Fire Denartment
1. Reserve for future fire truck (2nd year)
$
35,000
Capital Outlay
2. Unallocated
$
10,000
General Fund
Library
1. Unallocated
$
5100
Lihrary Fund
Electionm
1. Optical scan election machine
$
6,000
General Fund
2. Miscellaneous equipment
$
1,000
General Fund
1
CAPOUT.LIS: 9/24/93
page 3
Plannine/Zonine
1. Comprehensive plan update
Data Processing
1. Laser printer
2. System 36 terminal
3. Uninterruptible power supply units
Liquor
1. Building expansion - front window area
The following items were added since budeet workshop meeting
Finance
$ 8,000 General Fund
$ 3,500 General Fund
$ 1,000 General Fund
$ 700 General Fund
$ 12,000 Liquor Fund
1. Adding machine (calculator)
$
200
General Fund
Deputy Registrar
1. Safe for storage room
$
300
General Fund
Administration
1. Desk and chair - sniff addition
$
1,200
General Fund
2. Calculator - staff addition
$
226
General Fund
C
CAPOUT.I.IS: 9/24/'93 Page 4
COUNCIL UPDATE
September 27, 1893
Reeardina lease aareement between the Citv and Sunnv Fresh Foods. W.C.1
At the previous meeting of the City Council, Council directed City Stafr/Attorney to
prepare a lease agreement outlining terms associated with the temporary use of the
.5th Street right-of-way by Sunny Fresh Foods for parking. Council also directed staff
to negotiate/determine what the appropriate lease amount should be.
After discussing the matter with Sunny Fresh, we agreed that $10/month would be
appropriate. Unless Council objects to the lease amount, staff will be incorporating
this amount into the lease agreement.