City Council Agenda Packet 11-22-1993AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Monday, November 22, 1993 • 7 p.m.
Mayor: Ken Maus
Council Members: Shirley Anderson, Brad Fyle, Clint Herbst, Patty Olsen
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held November 8, 1993.
3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints.
4. Public hearing on the adoption of an assessment roll for the School
Boulevard improvement --Project 92.02.
5. Review of third quarter liquor store financial statements.
6. Consideration of final payment on Hart Boulevard trunk storm sewer
extension, Project 93.060.
7. Consideration of purchasing optical scan election equipment.
8. Consideration to review Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund (GMEF) Loan
No. 007 (Lawrence T. Demeules dba Standard Iron and Wire Works, Inc.)
for compliance of the GMEF Guidelines.
9. Consideration of renewing garbage contract with Vasko Rubbish Removal,
1 nc.
10. Consideration of hills for the month of November.
11. Closed session with City Attorney to discuss status of current litigation.
12. Adjournment.
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, November 8, 1993 - 7 p.m.
Members Present: Ken Maus, Shirley Anderson, Brad Fyle, Clint Herbst, Patty
Olsen
Members Absent: None
1. Call to order.
2. Consideration of approval of minutes of the reeular meetine held
October 25. 1993.
After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded by Shirley
Anderson to approve the meeting minutes as submitted. Motion carried
unanimously.
3. Citizens comments/netitions, reauests. and comulaints.
None forthcoming.
4. Consideration of an update on the development of the Economic
Develoament Partnership of Wrieht Countv.
Neil McMillan, representing the County Economic Development
Partnership, and County Commissioner, Pat Sawatzke, were present to
describe the goals, objectives, and organization of the Economic
Development Partnership and requested that the City Council consider
becoming a member of the Partnership.
Brad Fyle indicated that the concept of developing a County Economic
Development Partnership, which calls for participation of all the cities in
the county, is a good concept; however, Fyle was concerned about the fee
structure. He was not convinced that the City would gain an amount equal
to the required contribution ($1,500) from the City of Monticello to be a
member of the Partnership.
Ken Maus stated that participation in the Partnership could be a win/win
situation for the County and the City. Membership could result in
providing the City with more bona ride leads for industrial development in
the community. Shirley Anderson noted that she would not like to see the
City lose leads to other communities within Wright County as a result of
this program.
Page 1 a 1
Council Minutes - 1U8/93
Atter discussion, it was the consensus of the Council that participation in
the Partnership should be considered at some point in the future.
Mr. McMillan was asked to prepare additional regarding the operation of
the partnership that addresses issues raised by Council.
5. Public hearing on the adoption of an assessment roll for the Briar Oakes
pond nutlet.
Mayor Maus opened the public hearing.
Rick Wolfsteller reviewed the purpose of the project and outlined the
proposed assessment roll. There being no comments from the public, the
public hearing was closed.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by
Brad Fyle to adopt a resolution adopting the assessment roll as proposed
with the assessment being spread over 6 years at an interest rate of 7%.
Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 93-41.
6. Consideration of a resolution authorizing for the issuance and sale of
$980.000 in G.O. Refunding Bonds.
Jerry Shannon of Springsted, Inc., was present to review a proposal to
refinance a portion of the City's existing debt in order to save interest cost.
Shannon indicated that the bond issue proposed is called a cross-over
refunding bond issue, which means that the City is not allowed to pay off
the remaining balance until February 1, 1997, as this is the first call date
for the bonds we currently have. By selling a refunding bond issue today,
we are able to lock in the lower interest rates; but an escrow account is
established at a major bank which hangs onto our money until February 1,
1997, at which time the original bond is retired.
Rick Wolfsteller reported that because we have w wait a few years, the City
will not realize any immediate savings from the lower interest rate; but
overall it is projected that by refinancing today, well save a net of over
$130,000 in total interest expense.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by
Patty Olsen to adopt a resolution authorizing for the issuance and sale of a
$980,000 G.O. Improvement Refunding Bond, Series 1994A. Motion carried
unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 93-42.
Page 2 ���
Council Minutes - 118/93
Consideration of a request for a 2 -ft variance to the 10 -ft side vard setback
reouirement. Reauest is in coniunction with construction of an addition to a
single familv dwelling. Location is Block 5. Lot 14. Lower Monticello.
Applicant. Kevin and Mary Hook.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that the Hook family has decided
to withdraw the variance requests; therefore, no further action is necessary
on this matter.
Consideration of a reuuest for a conditional use permit allowing outside
storage. Applicant. Custom Canoov.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reviewed the recommendation made by the
Planning Commission with regard to a conditional use permit request
submitted by Custom Canopy. O'Neill noted that Custom Canopy is already
in operation and has obtained an occupancy permit, which makes the
conditional use permit request for outside storage somewhat after the fact.
City staff did not require that the business obtain a conditional use permit
prior W occupancy because staff was informed by the developer that the site
did not include any outside storage. O'Neill went on to review elements of
the site plan and outlined conditions associated with outside storage as
proposed by the Planning Commission. O'Neill noted that the Planning
Commission conditions included a strong screening requirement which
required complete screening of the site from a view from adjacent roads.
After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded by Patty
Olsen to adopt the recommendation made by the Planning Commission,
which is W approve issuance of the conditional use permit allowing outside
storage with the conditions as noted and with one modification: The
applicant is provided with the option of planting a double row of pine trees
as a screening fence along the western perimeter of the outside storage
area. Motion to grant the conditional use permit is based on the finding
that outside storage at this location under the conditions as noted is
consistent with the requirements of the city ordinance and is consistent
with the geography and character of the 1-2 zoning district. Motion carried
unanimously.
9. Consideration of a request fix it conditional use permit which would allow
outside sales, outside stornge, and consideration of a parking and drive aisle
conditional use, permit. Location: Lot 1. Block 2. Oakwood Industrial Park.
Apnlicant, Simonson Lumber.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that Simonson Lumber's request
for a conditional use permit stems from their request to construct a
56' x 112' foot shed on the southeast corner of the property. In order to
Page 3 ���
Council Minutes - 11/8/93
expand the use of the property as proposed, it is a requirement of the
ordinance that the site be upgraded to meet city standards. ONeill went on
to review the recommendation made by the Planning Commission.
After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded by Patty
Olsen to adopt the recommendations and proposed conditions as
recommended by the Planning Commission with one exception:
Development of curb and gutter along the perimeter of the parking lot area
is required at such time that enlargement or significant modifications are
made to the parking lot. Motion to approve said conditional use permit
requests is based on the finding that approval with associated conditions is
consistent with the city ordinance and consistent with the geography and
character of the 1-1 zoning district. Approval will not result in a,
depreciation of adjoining land values. Motion carried unanimously.
10. Consideration of adoptine the Undeveloped Rieht-of-wav Fencine Policv.
City Administrator Wolfsteller provided Council with a set of guidelines
that are intended to protect the City in instances where property owners
adjacent to undeveloped right-of-way are given permission to fence all or a
portion of the city right-of-way.
Mayor Maus asked .Jim Eisele if he has any problem with the proposed
undeveloped right-uf-way fencing policy. Jim Eisele indicated that he has
no problem with the policy as proposed.
After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by
Clint Herbst to adopt the policy as proposed subject to modifications by the
City Attorney. Motion carried unanimously.
11. Consideration of purchasing a replacement personal computer for deputy
registrar.
City staff reported that the software currently utilized by the deputy
registrar's office is being upgraded. In order to utilize the upgraded
software, the City will need to upgrade the existing personal computer
currently used by the deputy registrar. It was also noted that the fire
department is in need of a computer and that the computer now used by
deputy registrar could be moved to the fire department to fulfill their needs.
After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by
Shirley Anderson to approve the purchase of a new personal computer for
the deputy registrar department at a cost of approximately $3,000. Motion
carried unanimously.
Page 4
Council Minutes - 11/8/93
12. Consideration of reviewing status of Oak Ridge subdivision oroiect--Tonv
Emmerich.
Rick Wolfsteller reported that, at the previous meeting, it was the
consensus of Council to inform Mr. Emmerich that the letter of credit
requirement as outlined in the development agreement would continue to be
required if utility construction was going to continue this fall. At the
previous meeting, Council noted that if the letter of credit was not provided
by the meeting (11/8/93), Emmerich was asked to attend the meeting to
discuss the matter.
Jay Johnson, representing Tony Emmerich, indicated that it was his
understanding that the letter of credit was not actually needed until such
time that the developer requested that the lots be platted or until such time
that building occupancy is requested.
Clint Herbst noted that the City established certain requirements prior to
initiation of the project. The original development agreement stated that a
letter of credit needed to be provided at the time of construction of utilities.
Since the letter of credit was not provided as required, Council should take
action to stop the project until the letter of credit is provided. Brad Fyle
concurred that the City should obtain the letter of credit now. The City
does have liabilities that are not covered by the existing deposit provided by
the developer.
City Engineer, Bret Weiss, indicated that he supports obtaining the letter of
credit; however, when a project is shut down at this time of year, there can
he a negative impact. Jay Johnson indicated that obtaining the letter of
credit will not be a problem; however, it may take some time.
Ken Maus suggested that the City consider accepting an additiunal deposit
to carry the project until the letter of credit is provided.
After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by Brad
Fyle to direct the City Engineer to temporarily halt the project until such
time that the letter of credit as required by the development agreement is
submitted to the City. Voting in favor: Clint Herbst, Brad Fyle, Shirley
Anderson. Opposed: Ken Maus, Patty Olsen.
There being no further discussion, the meeting was adjourned.
Jeff O'Neill
Assistant Administrator
Page 5 �a I
Council Agenda - 11/22/93
4. Public hearing on the adoption of an assessment roll for the School
Boulevard imnrovement-•Proiect 92-02. (R.W.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
In conjunction with the Cardinal Hills phase 11 improvements, School
Boulevard was constructed between Fallon Avenue on the west to County
Road 118 on the east. While School Boulevard was opened in 1992, the
final bituminous overlay was just completed this summer, and it now
appears that final costs are able to be determined for this portion of the
improvement project. The project costs will be primarily paid by the School
District and Cardinal Hills development, with the City picking up
approximately 20% of the street construction only due to oversizing as a
collector street.
Total project cost for the street construction and storm sewer improvements
came to $287,579. After adding to this cost all the indirect costs for
engineering, inspection, and bonding fees, etc., the total project came to
$355,108.27. The City's share of the oversizing of School Boulevard at 20''4
amounts to $.55,076.02, with the balance of the total project cost of $300,000
being split by the Cardinal Hills development and the School. The following
allocation has been proposed for the assessment roll. The property owners
have been notified of the assessment hearing. In the case of the School
District's assessment, the School District has paid a large portion of this
project in advance and will he paying the entire balance by the end of the
year. In the case of the assessments pertaining to Value Plus Homes, the
City has already obtained some of the assessments on a per -lot basis as
each home is being built, and the remainder is proposed to be assessed to
the future lots as they are developed.
Prouosed Assessment
School District #882 $150,016.13
Value flus Homes $156,729.68
City of Monticello
--oversizing portion at 2014 $ 55,076.02
13. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
After closing the public hearing on the assessment roll, the first
alternative would he to adopt the resolution and assessment roll as
proposed. The assessments would he spread over a period of 10 years
at an interest rate of 6%.
Council Agenda - 11/22/93
Do not adopt the resolution at this time. This does not appear to be a
feasible alternative since the project has been completed and the
benefiting property owners have been notified.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that alternative N1 be adopted establishing the
assessment roll as proposed. Both the School District and Value Plus
Homes have been notified of the assessment hearing and the proposed
assessment roll. The School District has already paid a portion of the
improvement project and will be paying the remaining balance by
December 31. In order to get the assessment roll certified for collection
with next year's taxes, the assessment roll must be certified by
November 30, 1993.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of resolution; Copy of assessment roll summaries.
iL
RESOLUTION 83 -
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT 82-02
SCHOOL BOULEVARD
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice fully given as required by law, the Council has met
and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment of the improvements
of School Boulevard between ballon Avenue and County Road 118 with bituminous
surfacing, curb, gutter, and storm sewer.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON MONfICELLO,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessments, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part
hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against I.he
lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be
benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied
against it.
Such assessments against improved property shall be payable in equal annual
installments extending over a twriod of 10 years, the first of the installments to be
payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1996, and shall bear the interest
rate of Gob per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To
each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all
unpaid assessments.
The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the
ussessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property,
with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the city treasurer, except that nu
interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the
adoption of this resolution; and he may, at tiny time thereafter, pay to the city
treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest
accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment
must be made before November 15 or interest will Ile charged through December 31
of the next succeeding year.
The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the
county auditor to be extended mi tine property tax lists of the county. Such
assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal
taxes.
Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of November, 1993.
Mayor
City Administrator
0�
Street= 77.53%
Storm Sewer= 22.47%
100.00%
SCHOOL BOULEVARD (STREET)
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT 92-02
THROUGH 11/1/93
Construction Costs - Brown & Chris
$222,946.00
(see attached detail)
Coast to Coast
Engineering Fees:
design fee ($222,946 x 6.5%)
14,491.49
construction surveying, staling ($14,077.28 x 77.53%)
10,914.12
soil borings and testings
3,572.75
construction inspection
$20,626.62
(178.5 hrs 0 $35 x 77.53%)
4,843.69
(9 hr 0 $56/hr X 77.53%)
390.75
Legal and Miscellaneous ($20,626.62 x 77.53%)*
15,991.82
Admin. & Public Works Construction Fees
(1% of const. contract) ($222,946.00 x 1%)
2.229.46
TOTAL TO DATE $275,380.08
Less: City Share of Project ® 20% (55.076.02)
SUBTOTAL $220,304.06
SCHOOL DISTRICT PORTION (60% OF BALANCE) $110,152.03
CARDINAL HILLS DEVELOPMENT (50% OF BALANCE) $110,152.03
* Interest cost during construction $19,377.62
Irrigation repair
1,217.32
Coast to Coast
2.29
Times - legal notice
19.04
Miscellaneous
10.35
$20,626.62
6
SCHLBLVD.STR: l V1/93
Street - 77.53%
Storm Sewer o 22.47%
100.00%
SCHOOL BOULEVARD (STORM SEWER)
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT 92-02
THROUGH 11/1/93
Construction Costs - Brown & Chris
$ 64,633.00
(see attached detail)
Engineering Fees:
design fee ($87,758 z 6.5% z 90%)
5,133.84
construction surveying, staking ($14,077.28 :22.47%)
3,163.16
soil borings
0.00
construction inspection
(178.5 bra 0 $35 a 22.47%)
1,403.81
(9 hrs ® $56/hr z 22.47%)
113.26
Legal and Miscellaneous 1
($20,626.62 z 22.47%)
4,634.80
Admin. & Public Works Construction Fees
(1% of const. contract) ($64,633.00 a 1%)
646.33
TOTAL TO DATE
$ 79,728.19
SCHOOL DISTRICT PORTION (50% OF BALANCE) $ 39,864.10
CARDINAL HILLS DEVELOPMENT (60% OF BALANCE)" $ 39,864.10
"Add for Cardinal Hills - bonding cost of $5,713.56 to their total.
U
SCHLBLVD.STS: I VV93
SCHOOL BOULEVARD
PROJECT ALLOCATION
92-02
School
Street construction $110,152.03
Storm sewer construction 39.864.10
SUBTOTAL $150,016.13
Less: Advance payment (106,070.51)
Less: Interest earned on advance payment6 1( 02.68)
SUBTOTAL $37,842.94
Plus: Agreement for School to pay 1st year interest cost
on Value Plus assessment ($155,729.68 x 6%) 9,343.78
BALANCE REMAINING $47,186.72
Value Plus:
Street construction $110,152.03
Storm sewer 39,864.10
Bonding costs 5.713.55
SUBTOTAL $155,729.68
Less: Interest earned on advance payments on assessments (968.60)
Less: Credit for let year interest assumed by School per agreement (9,343.78
NET COST FOR VALUE PLUS DEVELOPMENT $145,417.30
Proposed Assessment:
Balance of proposed lots in Cardinal Hills,
phase II and above (228 lots + 145,417.30) _ $637.80 each
0
PROJECT 82-02 ASSESSMENT ROLL
(School Boulevard)
Annual Installments:
10 years
Method:
Equal principal, declining interest
Interest Rate:
6%
Interest Due From:
November 23, 1993
1st Installment Due:
1994
Purpose:
Bituminous streets, curb, gutter, storm
sewer along School Boulevard (92nd Street)
from Fallon Avenue to County Road 118
Financing Source:
1992 (A) G.O. Bond 11327
Ad Valorem:
$ bb,076.02
Assessed:
$304,778.31
0
J
PROJECT 92-02
SCHOOL BOULEVARD
PID #
Name
Descrintion
Amount
155-500-133300
Value Plus Homes of
(Cardinal Hills 3rd Addition)
$
40,819.20
Monticello, Inc.
Unplatted land in Sec. 13, Twp 121,
Range 25
155-011-000230
Value Plus Homes of
Lot 23, Auditors Subdivision # 1
$
41,457.00
Monticello, Inc.
155.011-000172
Independent School
Part of Lot 17 & Lot 20
$159,359.91
District #882
Auditor's Subdivision #1
155.073.001010
Value Plus Homes
Lots 1-3, Block 1, Cardinal Hills 2nd Add.
$
31,252.20
through
of Monticello, Inc.
Lots 1-4, Block 2, Cardinal Hills 2nd Add.
155-073.006090
Lots 1-14, Block 3, Cardinal Hills 2nd Add.
I.ot 1, Block 4, Cardinal Hills 2nd Add.
Lots 1.18, Block 5, Cardinal Hills 2nd Add.
Lots 1-9, Block 6, Cardinal Hills 2nd Add.
155-078-001010
Value Plus Homes
Lot 1, Block 1, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155.078-001020
Value Plus Homes
Lot 2, Block 1, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155.078-001030
Value Plus Homes
Lot 3, Block 1, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155.078.001040
Value Plus Homes
Lot 4, Block 1, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
165-078-002010
Value Plus Homes
Lot 1, Block 2, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
156-078.002020
Value Plus Homes
Lot 2, Block 2, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078.002030
Value Plus Homes
Lot 3, Block 2, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
G37.80
155-078.002040
Value Plus Homes
Lot 4, Block 2, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078.002050
Value Plus Homes
Lot 5, Block 2, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078.002060
Value Plus Homes
Lot 6, Block 2, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
156.078-002070
Value Plus Homes
Lot 7, Block 2, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
Q -r-1
PROJECT 92-02
SCHOOL BOULEVARD
PID 11
Name
Descriation
Amount
155-078-002080
Value Plus Homes
Lot 8, Block 2, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-002090
Value Plus Homes
Lot 9, Block 2, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-002100
Value Plus Homes
Lot 10, Block 2, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-002110
Value Plus Homes
Lot 11, Block 2, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-002120
Value Plus Homes
Lot 12, Block 2, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-002130
Value Plus Homes
Lot 13, Block 2, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-002140
Value Plus Homes
Lot 14, Block 2, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-002150
Value Plus Homes
Lot 15, Block 2, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-002160
Value Plus Homes
Lot 16, Block 2, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-002170
Value Plus Homes
Lot 17, Block 2, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-003010
Value Plus Homes
Lot 1, Block 3, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-003020
Value Plus Homes
Lot 2, Block 3, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-003030
Value Plus Homes
Lot 3, Block 3, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-003040
Value Plus Homes
Lot 4, 13lock 3, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-003050
Value Plus Homes
Lot 5, Block 3, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-003060
Value Plus Homes
Lot 6, Block 3, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-003070
Value Plus Homes
Lot 7, Block 3, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-00:3080
Value Plus Homes
Lot 8, Bleck :1, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-003090
Value Plus Homes
Lot 9, 13lock 3, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155.078-003100
Value Plus Homes
[,at 10, Block 3, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-003110
Value Plus Homes
Lot 11, Block 3, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-003120
Value Plus Homes
Lot 12, Block 3, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-003130
Value Plus Homes
Lot 13, Block 3, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155.078-003140
Value Plus Homes
Lot 14, Block 3, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-003150
Value Plus Homes
Lot 15, Block 3, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-003160
Value Plus Homes
Lot 16, Block 3, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155.078-063170
Value Plus Homes
Lot 17, Block 3, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
PROJECT 92-02
SCHOOL BOULEVARD
PID #
Name
Descrintion
Amount
155-078-003180
Value Plus Homes
Lot 18, Block 3, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-003190
Value Plus Homes
Lot 19, Block 3, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-003200
Value Plus Homes
Lot 20, Block 3, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-003210
Value Plus Homes
Lot 21, Block 3, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155.078.004010
Value Plus Homes
Lot 1, Block 4, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-004020
Value Plus Homes
Lot 2, Block 4, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-004030
Value Plus Homes
Lot 3, Block 4, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-004040
Value Plus Homes
Lot 4, Block 4, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-004050
Value Plus Homes
Lot 5, Block 5, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-004060
Value Plus Homes
Lot 6, Block 5, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-004070
Value Plus Homes
Lot 7, Block 5, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
155-078-004080
Value Plus Homes
Lot 8, Block 5, Cardinal Hills 3rd Add.
$
637.80
O
Council Agenda - 11/22/93
b. Review of third quarter liquor store financial statements. IR.W.I
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Enclosed with the agenda you will find copies of the third quarter and the
year-to-date financial statements for the liquor store operation as of 9/30/93.
Liquor Store Manager, Joe Hartman, will be in attendance at the meeting
to review the financial statements with the Council. The review of the
financial statements was delayed until this meeting to allow for
Mr. Hartman to attend the meeting.
In reviewing the financial report, you will note that total sales for the year
is approximately $13,000 lower than last year at this time. While liquor,
wine, and miscellaneous sales items show slight increases in their
categories so far, the biggest change has been occurring in our beer sales in
that they have dropped over $24,000 in comparison to last year at this time.
This sales drop has not, been unexpected in that with the cooler and wetter -
than -normal spring acid sunuuer, we were prepared for the beer sales to
show a lower dollar amount than last year.
Gross profit wise, the major sales categories appear in line with our
expectations, and the overall gross profit percentage for all sales at 24.47%
is in line with our original projections. Because of the 3 1/254, drop in beer
sales so far, our resulting net operating income is also lower than last year
by approximately $,5,600. This entire drop in operating income can be
attributed to the lost beer sales in that our normal gross profit on the
$24,000 in beer sales would have amounted to approximately $5,000
operating income profit. The overall operating income fir the first 9 months
is $114,814 versus $120,399 last year.
Nothing in the financial report at this time seems to point to any particular
problem area, as the percentages are what we expected, etc. Although we
do not like to see any of our sales categories drop, Joe and 1 believe the
unseasonably cool and wet weather have a direct hearing on the beer sales,
which is Die only category that has decreased since last year. The liquor
operation is still certainly profitable and should continue to be so in the
future.
After review of the financial statement, the Council can accept the reports
Lis presented.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of financial reports.
MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR
REVENUE AND EXPENSES
COMPARISON FOR THE YEAR
ENDING SEPT 30, 1992 AND 1993
1992 1993
YEAR-TO-DATE YEAR-TO-DATE
AMOUNT AMOUNT
SALES
Liquor
292,387
298,272
Beer
669,171
645,005
Mine
101,698
105,284
Other Merchandise
39,321
40,648
Misc Non -Taxable Sales
1,063
1,410
Discounts
TOTAL SALES
1,103,639
1,090,618
COST OF GOODS SOLD
(834,217)
(823,725)
GROSS PROFIT
269,422 24.41%
aa�aaaaaaa
266,893
=aaaaaaaaa
'ENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE
Personal services
Salaries
75,331
78,538
PERA
2,807
2,890
FICA
5,700
5,946
Insurance
7,362
8,256
Unemployment Benefits
1
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
91,240 8.27%
95,630
Supplies '
office Supplies
150
439
General Operating Supplie
5,476
5,145
Other Supplies
768
135
TOTAL SUPPLIES
6,394 .58%
5,719
24.47%
6.77%
.52%
-66
MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR
REVENUE AND EXPENSES
COMPARISON FOR THE YEAR
ENDING SEPT 30, 1992 AND 1993
1992 1993
YEAR-TO-DATE YEAR-TO-DATE
AMOUNT AMOUNT
Other Services & Charges
Professional Services
3,225
Maintenance Agreements
(161)
Communication
750
Travel -Conference -schools
42,555
Advertising
2,853
Insurance
15,293
Utilities, Electric
7,275
Utilities, Heating
725
Utilities, Sewer & Water
332
Utilities, Refuse
Maintenance, Equipment
3,117
Maintenance, Building
2,136
Maintenance, Other
250
Depreciation --Acquired As
14,322
Other Misc Expenses
921
TOTAL OTHER SERVICES 6 CH
51,389
TOTAL GENERAL & ADMIN BXPENS
149,023
TOTAL OPERATING INCOME
120,399
aaaaaaaaaa
Other Income (Expense)
Interest Income
42,716
Cash Long/Short
(161)
sale of Property
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
42,555
NET INCOME (EXPENSE)
162,954
aanaaaaaoa
Transfers In/Out
4DJUSTBD NET INCOME (EXPENSE
4.66%
13.50%
10.91%
3.86%
14.77%
162,954 14.77%
a avaaaavaa
2,500
854
58
3,383
15,790
8,780
889
135
1,731
1,617
74
13,930
825
50,731
152,079
114,814
aaaacaaaac
10,138
(55)
10,083
125,044
aaaaaanavn
4.65%
13.94%
10.53%
125,044 11.47%
aaaaavaaaa
CD
27.88%
21.02%
34.92%
36.67%
64.40%
24.47%
MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR
GROSS PROFIT
BY PRODUCT
COMPARISON FOR THE YEAR
ENDING SEPT 30,
1992 AND 1993
1992
1993
YEAR-TO-DATE
YEAR-TO-DATE
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
Liquor Sales
292,387
298,272
Discounts
Cost of Sales
215,469
215,127
GROSS PROFIT -
LIQUOR
76,919
26.31%
83,145
Beer sales
669,171
645,005
Cost of Sales
521,395
509,399
GROSS PROFIT -
BEER
147,776
22.08%
135,606
Wine Sales
101,698
105,284
Cost of Sales
69,975
68,515
GROSS PROFIT
- NINE
31,723
31.19%
36,769
.isc sales
39,321
40,648
Cost of Sales
22,456
25,743
GROSS PROFIT
- MISC TAXABLE 16,865
42.89%
14,905
Misc Non-taxable Bales
1,063
1,410
Cost of sales
876
501
----------
GROSS PROFIT
- MISC NON -TAXA
----------
187
17.59%
908
TOTAL SALES
1,103,639
1,090,618
TOTAL COST OF
SALES
830,171
819,285
TOTAL FREIGHT
COST
4,046
4,440
TOTAL GROSS PROFIT
269,422
vaea�eaenc
24.41%
266,893
aceeveaaae
27.88%
21.02%
34.92%
36.67%
64.40%
24.47%
MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR
REVENUE AND EXPENSES (Q)
COMPARISON FOR THE QUARTER
ENDING SEPT 30, 1992 AND 1993
1992 1993
QTD-TO-DATE QTD-TO-DATE
AMOUNT AMOUNT
SALES
Liquor
108,184
111,052
Beer
255,786
249,795
wine
37,349
38,338
Other Merchandise
16,420
15,464
Misc Non -Taxable Sales
403
433
Discounts
----------
----------
TOTAL SALES
418,142
415,082
COST OF GOODS SOLD
(303,302)
----------
(312,352)
----------
GROSS PROFIT
114,840 27.46%
a aaaaaaaac
102,730
aaaaaaaaaa
ENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE
Personal Services
Salaries
25,523
26,780
PERA
944
978
FICA
1,934
2,030
Insurance
1,841
2,752
Unemployment Benefits
1
----------
----------
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
30,243 7.13%
32,540
Supplies
Office Supplies
38
61
General Operating Supplie
1,706
2,085
other Supplies
60
----------
95
----------
TOTAL SUPPLIES
1,804 .43%
2,241
24.79%
7.84%
.54%
05-
MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR
REVENUE AND EXPENSES (Q)
COMPARISON FOR THE QUARTER
ENDING SEPT 30, 1992 AND 1993
1992 1993
QTD-TO-DATE QTD-TO-DATE
AMOUNT AMOUNT
Other Services & Charges
Professional Services
2,500
Maintenance Agreements
Communication
253
286
Travel -Conference -Schools
58
Advertising
1,456
678
Insurance
4,643
5,235
utilities, Electric
3,249
3,487
Utilities, Heating
10
76
Utilities, Sewer & Water
148
129
Utilities, Refuse
Maintenance, Equipment
77
874
Maintenance, Building
810
680
Maintenance, Other
37
Depreciation --Acquired As
4,774
4,644
Other Misc Expenses
524
----------
360
----------
TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CH
16,075
3.84%
19,090
4.60%
TOTAL GENERAL & ADMIN EXPENS
48,122
----------
11.51%
53,872
----------
12.98%
TOTAL OPERATING INCOME
66,718
aaaaaaaaon
15.96%
48,858
aaaa�aaaan
11.77%
Other Income (Expense)
Interest Income
10,056
3,382
Cash Long/Short
(54)
(124)
Sale of Property
----------
----------
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
10,002
.24%
3,257
.78%
NET INCOME (EXPENSE)
76,721
aaaaaaaaaa
18.35%
52,173
Oaaaaaaa0a
12.55%
Transfers In/Out
4DJUSTED NET INCOME (EXPENSE
76,721
aaaaaaoaaa
18.35%
52,173
aaaaaaaaea
12.55%
0
1
Liquor Sales
Discounts
Cost of Sales
GROSS PROFIT - LIQUOR
Beer Sales
Cost of Sales
GROSS PROFIT - BEER
Wine Sales
Cost of Sales
GROSS PROFIT - WINE
.fisc Sales
Cost of Sales
GROSS PROFIT - MISC TAXABLE
Misc Non-taxable Sales
Cost of Sales
GROSS PROFIT - MISC NON -TAI
TOTAL BALES
TOTAL COST OF SALES
TOTAL FREIGHT COST
TOTAL GROSS PROFIT
MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR
GROSS PROFIT BY PRODUCT (Q;
COMPARISON FOR THE QUARTER
ENDING SEPT 30, 1992 AND 1993
1992
QTD-TO-DATE
AMOUNT
108,184
77,106
31,079
255,786
188,135
---67, -
651
37,349
24,172
- -
13,177
16,420
12,105
--4 , 314-
403
235
A ------168
418,142
301,753
1,549
114,840
aaay..aaav
* Cost of sales were adjusted to correct
previous quarter posting errors
1993
QTD-TO-DATE
AMOUNT
111,052
79,015
-32,037
249,795
191,904
-
57,891
38,338
24,887
-
13,450
15,464
14,846
----------
619
433
(26)
------459
415,082
310,627
1,726
102,730
000.00=2..
28.85%
23.18%
35.08%
401
24.75%
lJ
Current Assets:
Cash
Change Fund
Investments
Accounts Receivable
A/R - NSF Checks
Inventory
Prepaid Insurance
TOTAL, CURRENT ASSETS
MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR
BALANCE SHEET
30Sep93
191,041.57
1,600.00
251,348.67
(300.13)
196,998.49
10,660.50
651,349.10
Fixed Assets
Land & Parking Lot
Buildings
Furniture & Equipment
less: Accumulated Depreciation
TOTAL FIXED ASSETS
TOTAL ASSETS
Liabilities
Accounts Payable
Due to EDA Bund
Sales Tax Payable
Salaries Payable
Accrued Vacation/Sick Leave
Other Accrued Expenses
TOTAL LIABILITIES
RETAINED EARNINGS
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
46,591.03
199,285.65
75,993.73
(192,383.38)
------------
129,487.03
------------
780,836.13
=ao====eanc.
59,055.55
115,000.00
10,536.56
4,040.65
11,561.90
(9,277.15)
------------
190,917.51
589,918.62
------------
780,836.13
oecnee...nun
W
Council Agenda - 11/22/93
6. Consideration of final payment on Hart Boulevard trunk storm
sewer extension. Proiect 93060. W.S.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
LaTour Construction, Inc., of Maple Lake, has completed the work cn the
Hart Boulevard trunk storm sewer extension, including the stub street
coming out to County Road 75 for the new Hart Boulevard entrance. The
original contract amount for the project was $134,881.31. The total
construction cost came to $137,252.43, a difference of $2,371.12.
Our previous payments to LaTour Construction total $102,902.93, leaving a
balance due of $34,349.50. This is the amount considered for final payment
to LaTour.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative is to approve final payment to LaTour
Construction, Inc., for City of Monticello Project 93-06C, in the
amount of $34,349.50.
2. The second alternative would he not to approve final payment.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the City Engineer and Public Works Director
that City Council authorize final payment to LaTour Construction for the
Hart Boulevard trunk storm sewer extension, Project 93-06C, in the amount
of $.34,349.50 as outlined in alternative #1. Final payment, as always, is
contingent upon the contractor providing the necessary documentation as
required by contract in regard to lien waivers, etc.
1). SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of request for final payment from the City Engineer; Copy of final pay
voucher and voucher detail list.
i lfX LtrKd--i1'��
0A0S)&�= (/
n1G
306 Parc Pian Cenkt
5775 Wayzata Boukvard
MkmeaPOK MN 55416.1228
612.595-5775
I.WO-753-5775
FAX 595.5774
En nern
November 17, 1993 Planners
Surveym
Mayor and City Council
City of Monticello
P.O. Box 1147
250 East Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362
'Re: Hart Boulevard Trunk Storm Sewer Extension
City Project No, 93-06C
OSM Project No. 5073.10
Dear Mayor and City Council:
Enclosed are four (4) copies of Construction Pay Voucher No. 2 / Final Payment for the
referenced project in the amount of $34,349.50.
Please make payment in the amount of $34,34950 to LaTour Construction, Inc., 2134
County Road 8 NW, Maple Lake, MN 55358 at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
ORR-SCNELEN-MAYERON
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
-DIL
Bret A. Weiss, P.E.
Project Manager, Associate
Enclosures
c: LaTour Construction, Inc.
/tun
v
tWn11AcMiiL&1T0f%M&Fl LLM 10W OW&T.ttT Em0".
CONSTRUCTION PAY VOUCHER
Estimate Voucher Number: 2 Date: November 20, 1993
OSM Project Number: 5073.10 Period Ending: October 31, 1993
Project: HART BLVD TRUNK STORM SEWER EXTENSION / FINAL PAYMENT
CITY OF MONTICELLO 93-06C
Contractor: LATOUR CONSTRUCTION, INC.
2134 COUNTY ROAD 8 NW
MAPLE LAKE MN 55358
Contract Date:
Work Started:
Completion Date:
Work Completed:
Original Contract Amount
134,881.31
Total Additions
2,650.00
Total Deductions
0.00
Total Funds Encumbered
137,531.31
Total Work Certified to Date
137,252.43
Less Retained Percentage
0.00% 0.00
Less Previous Payments
102,902.93
Total Payments Incl This Voucher
137,252.43
Balance Carried Forward
278.88
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT, THIS VOUCHER 34,349.50
APPROVALS
ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Pursuant to our field observation, as performed in accordance with our
contract, and based on our professional opinion, materials are
satisfactory and the work properly performed in accordance with the plans
and specifications and that the total work is:
100% Completed as of October 31, 1993.
We herby recommend payment of this voucher. /� y
Signed: Signed:
Construction Observer Project Manager/Engineer
LATOUR CONSTRUCTION, INC.
This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge, information, and
belief, the quantities and values of work certified herein is a fair
approximate estimate for the period covered by this voucher.
Contractor: Signed By
Date:
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Chocked By:
Date:
Title
Approved for payment:
Authorized Representative
Date:
PAGE 1
-14
V O U C H E R D E T A I L L I S T 0
Estimate V -her Huber: 2 Project: ART BLVD TR(INK STORM SEWER EXTENSION / FINAL PATMENI Date: NOVEMBER 10, 1993
OSN Project Nu6er- 5073.10 CITY OF MONTICELLO PNOJ. MO.: 93.060
for
CITY O MONTICELLO
TRM STORM KKR ERTEN IOM
'
Cmtract
CmtrKt
Completed
This Month
Total To
Det*
Itao Spec to DMcrlptlm
Ch -ti TV Unite
......... ..........
Unit Price
............. .............
Total Price 0l tlty
......... .............
Total
0u tIty
.........
Total Price
............
.... ............................................
1 2101.511 CLEARING AND GRUBBING
1 LLIP SUI
6,320.00
6,320.00
0
0.00
1
6,320.00
2 2105.501 RITE GRADING COPILETE
1 LUMP SUN
4,100.00
4,100.00
1
4,100.00
1
4,100.00
3 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMIMOUS PAVEMENT
1260 So YD
2.40
3,072.00
0
0.00
1052
2,524.80
4 2104.513 SAWCUT PAVEMENT ALL TYPES (FULL
300 LIN IT
2.20
660.00
310
662.00
310
662.00
DEPTH)
S 2104.550 REMOVE COIICRETC CLIMB l GUTTER
425 LIN FT
2.70
1,147.50
0
0.00
433
1,169.10
6 2104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALK
760 So FT
0.30
234.00
0
0.00
1539
461.70
7 2104.509 REMOVE MANHOLE
3 EACH
250.00
750.00
O
0.00
3
750.00
6 2104.501 REMOVE PIPE (ALL TYPES AND HIES)
360 LIN IT
4.00
1,440.00
0
0.00
358
1,432.00
92105323 GRAMMAR BORROW (LV)
?SO CU YO
4.15
3,112.50
0
0.00
260
1,079.00
10 2103.522 SELECT GRAMMAR BORROW (LV)
300 CU YD
4.65
1,395.00
40
166.00
340
1,501.00
11 2105.543 GRAMMAR FOUNDATION
100 CU YD
11.30
1,130.00
49
$53.70
99
1,118.70
12 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE MODIFIED CLASS S
460 TON
7.11
3,312.00
29
208.80
435
3,132.00
13 2331.508 TYPE 41 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE
120 TON
26.30
3,156.00
98.12
2,S60.S6
08.12
2,580.56
14 2331.514 TYPE 31 BASE COURSE MIKTURE
120 low
27.30
3,276.00
116.4
3,177.72
116.4
3,177.72
15 2337.SC2 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK CGT
SS GALLON
1.03
57.75
SO
31.50
30
31.50
16 2503.541 12' RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CL V
174 LIN It
21.80
3,793.20
.2
-43.60
155
3,379.00
17 2503.541 36' PC PIPE tEWER DESIGN 3006 CL 1t
20 LIN IT
52.60
1,056.00
2
105.60
28
1,478.40
18 2503.541 46• RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CL 11
395 LIN IT
79.50
31,402.50
2.5
/98.75
392.5
31,203.75
19 2S03.SA1 60• RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CL 11
109 LIN I1
105.00
11,445.00
-1.5
-157.50
113.5
11,917.50
20 2501.569 60. 1 AS- RC TRANSITION SECTIONS
2 EACH
985.00
1,970.00
0
0.00
2
1,970.00
21 2506.506 EXTRA 48m DIA. MANHOLE
12.62 LIN IT
71.00
806.02
4.58
325.18
17
1,207.00
22 2SO1.S1S 36m RC PIPE APRON V/IRASN GUARD
1 UCN
1,040.00
1,040.00
0
0.00
1
1,040.00
23 2301.S1S 60m RC PIPE APRON V/TRASH CARD
1 EACH
2,255.00
2,253.00
0
0.00
1
2,255.00
24 2506.308 CONSTRUCT PANNONE DESIGN 64.4019
2 EACH
3,135.00
6,310.00
0
0.00
2
6,310.00
25 2506.506 ENTRA 84m DIA. M.N. UPTN OVEN 10•
5.42 LIN /T
235.00
1,273.70
.62
192.70
6.24
1,466.40
26 2506.509 CONSYMAX1 CATCH BASIN O911CM
3 UCN
745.00
2,235.00
0
0.00
3
2,235.00
27 2621311 6- DUCTILE 111011 PIPE tEWER CL 52
125 LIN IT
21.00
2,625.00
0
0.00
126
2,66.00
26 2621.511 1S• PVC SON 35
22 LIN IT
20.50
451.00
0
0.00
23
471.50
29 2621.511 16m DUCTILE IBM PIPE UWER CL SO
162 LIN IT
34.90
5,653.80
0
0.00
161
5,616.90
30 2621.502 13. 1 6* PVC WYE
1 EACH
186.00
164.00
0
0.00
1
184. DO
31 2621.508 BTC 41 SANITARY IMN MAMNOLB (0-
3 EACH
1,320.00
3,960.00
0
0.00
1
5.%0.00
10')
P 014
V 0 U C H E R D E t A 1 l L I S T
ab
Estistate Vaxher Muer: 2 Project: MART BLVD TRUNK STORM SEWER EXTENSION / FINAL PAYMENT Date: NOVEMBER 10, 1993
OSM Project Mtuber: 5073.10 CITY OF NMI ice
LLO PROJ. WO.: 93-06[
for
CITY OF MONTICELLO
TRUNK STORK SEWER EXTENSION
1 OF 4
Contract
Cmtrect
CoMteted This Kwth
Total To Date
Items Spec No Oascription
OV►ntity Unita
Unit Price
Totsi Price
Ot ti ty
Total
OUentI ty
iota( Price
.-'- ........ ....................................
32 DIV. II CONNECT TO EXISTING MAMHOI.E/STUD
......... ..........
3 EACH
.............
385.00
............. .........
1,155.00
0
.............
0.00
.........
3
............
1,155,00
31 2621.506 EXTRA 48' MANHOLE
9.79 LIM FT
71.00
695.09
-1.8
-127.80
9,95
706.45
34 2104.505 CONCRETE DITCH
63 LIN FT
88.00
5,544.00
60.S
5,324.00
60.5
5,324.00
35 2511.501 RANDOM tIPtAP CLASS Iii
310 SO TO
14.60
4,526.00
0
0.00
110
4,526.00
36 2511,501 RAM" RIPRAP CLASS IV
140 SO TO
17,60
2,464.00
0
0.00
140
2,464.00
37 2521.501 4- CONCRETE VALK
325 SO FT
2.70
877.50
590
1,593.00
590
1,593.00
38 2511.501 CONCRETE CURB t GUTTER DESIGN 0618
285 LIM FT
10.10
2,870.50
284
2,860.40
284
2,868.40
39 2531,501 CONCRETE CURB S GUTTER DESIGN 8612
160 LIN FT
10.10
1,616.00
150
1,Si5.OD
150
1,515.00
40 2531.507 8- CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT -18'
I EACH
7'94. DO
794.00
1
794.00
1
794,00
VIDE
41 2531.507 8• CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT - 24'
1 EACH
989.00
989.00
1
989. DID
1
P89.00
VIDE
42 2573.502 SILT FENCE, HEAVY DUTY
90 LIM tT
7.50
225.00
6
15.00
6
15.00
43 2575,523 WOW FIBER BLANKET TYPE REGULAR
300 SO YO
1.3D
390.00
0
O.W
0
0.00
44 2575.501 SEEDING (TOPSOIL, FERTILIZER S
.55 ACRE
925.00
508,75
.63
582.75
.63
56:.75
MULCH)
45 2575.505 SODDING
660 SO TO
1.80
1,188.00
386
694.80
366
694.80
46 2621.511 6- PVC PIPE SEVEN SDR 26 SERVICE
85 Lim FT
15,50
1,317.50
0
0.00
87
1,340.50
PIPE
TOTAL TRUNK STORM SEVER EXTENSION
............
I .......
S 114,881.31
....................
t 76,389.56
....................
S 132,050.43
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
Contract
Contract
Coaplatod This Month
Total
TR Data
Itw Spec No Description
....................................
0w llty Unita
Unit Price
.............
Total Price
OWantlty
total
Want l ty
total Price
.... ........
/ DIV. 11 RORRLE REMOVAL S OI SPOSAL
...................
100 CU to
26.50
...........
............. .........
2,650.00
I ........
96
....................
.............
2,544.00
.........
196
....................
............
5,194.00
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER Rte, 1
D 2,650.00
S 2,SA4.00
S 5,194.00
1 OF 4
ENtImtN v*Lcfw MnbNrt 2
OSM PMJKt Rubrf $073.10
for
CITY Of NONTICELLO
CAM TOTAL
V 0 U C R E R 0 E T A I L L 1 5 T
Projwt1 RANT BLVD 1. STOP SM,
EXTENSION / FINAL PAYMENT
CITY Of NONTICELLO PO
A.
NO.: 93.060
„m•••3 137,531.31
4 OFA
S 28.933.56
Date- IIOVEI®ER 10, 1993 0
S 137.252.13
Council Agenda - 11/22/93
7. Consideration of ourchasin¢ outical scan election eouinment. (H.W.)
A. REFERENCE. AND BACKGROUND
For the past 10 years or so, the City has been using an electronic punch
card voting system for our elections. The City was one of the first
communities in the county to automate the election process by going to the
puncta card system, but it now appears that our equipment is becoming
outdated, and the City should consider switching to an optical scan paper
ballot type system that is widely utilized in the state of Minnesota.
Since the City automated 10 years ago, a number of other communities have
also automated their election system by going with a new method of reading
ballots, the optical scan procedure. For example, the City of Otsego,
Rockford City and Rockford Township, City of Delano, along with the City of
Buffalo are current users of the optical scan system supplied by Business
Records Corporation. In addition, the City of Cokato is currently in the
process of purchasing the same equipment, and I also believe Maple lake is
considering the same option. 1 believe within the next few years, virtually
all cities in Wright County will probably be on this system; and if we do not
change also tit this time, we'll probably be the only ones automated with the
punch card system.
The current support system the City has for its punch card voting
equipment comes from Illinois; and although this has not been a problem, I
do not believe there are very many communities left in Minnesota that are
still using the punch card system. The primary reasons the Council is being
asked to consider purchasing a new system at this time are because used
equipment has become available through BHC that is identical to 95/, of all
the equipment currently used for optical scan, and due to the fact that at
our last election we experienced mechanical breakdowns of our punch card
system which delayed counting until 4 a.m. It certainly appears inevitable
that although we were a leader in automated voting in Wright County 10
years ago, we will soon he one of the very few communities that is not
utilizing the optical scan method.
11RC, the supplier of the optical scan equipment, is also the City's current
supplier of our computer hardware and software system. With hundreds of
communities in Minnesota currently utilizing the optical scan equipment
being proposed by BRC, I think the City can he pretty comfortable in
knowing that we would he changing to a system that is widely accepted
throughout Minnesota and will likely he supported with software
Council Agenda - 11/22/93
enhancements in the future because of the large amount of users. Virtually
all of the communities in Hennepin and Ramsey counties currently use this
same equipment; and as 1 noted earlier, I believe most of the voting public
in Wright County will eventually he using the same equipment.
The Council is being asked to consider authorizing the purchase of a used
OPTECHIII-P optical scan voting equipment at a cost of $4,500. In
addition, the City would be required to purchase a backup program for an
additional $315. Also available for $415 is a demonstration program and
sample ballots that we may want to consider also. This compares to a new
cost of $7,800 for the basic optical scan system. As part of the proposed
1994 budget, I have included $7,000 in the election fund for acquisition of
new equipment anticipating that we would he looking at this type of a
purchase early next year. In discussions with BRC, the City would not have
to actually purchase the equipment until next year; but BRC would like to
know if they should hold any of the used equipment for us until that time.
The used equipment proposed here would have the same warranty as new
equipment; and as I noted earlier, it is the same equipment that is
currently used by other communities in Wright County and the majority of
the state. The reason used equipment became available is that, in this case,
the State of Oklahoma was requiring that all cities and counties in the state
utilize the same new optical scan equipment that was available, thus some
previously -owned machines were not exactly the same as the new
equipment and are now available for resale.
While there may be some additional features that tire available on the new
$7,800 equipment, I would not recommend that option at this time, as again
we would be the only community in Wright County and possibly one of the
few in the state to have this new piece of equipment, and again we would be
different than most others using this type of equipment. I do believe it's
better t.o have the same piece of equipment that most of the state is using;
and due to the fact that we can obtain is used piece of equipment, we can
save money besides.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
Council could authorize the purchase of a used OPTECHIII-P optical
scan system for $4,500, a backup PROM pack, which is required by
the state, for $315, and a demonstration PROM puck with 400 sample
ballots for $415. If authorized, this purchase can he delayed until
early in 1994 to coincide with our budget.
Do not authorize the purchase at this time.
Council Agenda • 11/22/93
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Unfortunately, I think the time has come where we should be looking at a
new voting system for our citizens. The punch card system has worked
fairly well for the City the past 10 years; but because of the major problem
we experienced at the last election and due to the fact that very few
locations are currently using the punch card system anymore in Minnesota,
support is becoming very limited, and we really don't have much choice if
we want to remain with the majority. The optical scan system, at least for
the time being, is the most widely used electronic voting system in
Minnesota. The equipment proposed would be identical to the majority of
equipment now being used in Minnesota and would be purchased from a
local reputable supplier, BAC. One additional advantage to the optical scan
equipment is that the ballots are counted immediately after the individual
votes; and thus at 8:05 p.m. on the day of election, the results are known
immediately.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Pricing information and equipment brochure from BRC.
CITY OF MONTICELLO, MN
Quantity Descrintion Price
1 Optech III -P (Used) $4,500
Includes:
Optech III -P
Prom Pack
Steel Ballot Box
Nylon Carrying Case
Licensed Software
Back -Up Prom Pack $ 315 each
(Required by the State of Minnesota)
Model VI Voting Booth with Light $ 175 each
Demonstration Prom Pack $ 415
with 400 Sample Ballots
Ballot Box - (Plastic) for Demonstration $ 160
All prices are F.O.B. Berkeley, California
MAINTENANCE WARRANTY
This shipment is warranted against defective components and workmanship for a period of
90 days after the first electlon that it is used, or one year from date of delivery, whichever
comes first, provided that it is in accordance with BRC recommended procedures/
specifications and BRC approved ballots. During the warranty period, BRC will repair or
replace equipment or components that are defective. No other warranty is expressed or
Implied.
OPTECH III -P
MAINTENANCE
COSTS
$520/each
2 Yr. Agreement
Includes:
All parts, labor and access to
backup
equipment (See attached agreement).
OPTECH III -P
ELECTION TRAINING AND
SUPPORT
$400/2 Yr. Agreement
Includes:
Unlimited Training
Pre -Election Seminar
Telephone Consultations
Test Deck Support
Hot -Line Support
Problem Analysis
Priority Access to Staff
Newsletter
Software Maintenance
Documentation Updates
Diagnostic Testing Consultation
September 22, 1993
Mr. Rick Wolfsteller, Administrator
City of Monticello
P.O. Box 1147
Monticello, MN 55362-9245
Dear Rick:
Thank you for your time and interest In discussing your election system. Enclosed
you will find a proposal showing the Investment for the Optech III -P and the necessary
supplies to run your election efficiently.
Business Records Corporation (BRC) is the number one supplier of election
equipment in the world. In the 1992 Presidential election, over 50% of all ballots
processed were tabulated on BRC's equipment. The key to our success has been the
reliability of our equipment as well as our training and support programs.
BRC is a $125 million company with over 800 employees. Our size and staff assures
you that we will continue to be here to service all of your election needs.
Rick, please review the proposal and if you have any questions, feel free to give me a
call at 1-800-800-8255.
Sincerely,
BUSINESS RECORDS CORPORATION
Kevin Lafeber
Senior Sales Representative
Enclosure
Im
7227 Third Street South, P.O. Box 1082. St. Cloud. MN 58302 Phone: 812.257.2170 0
Business Records Corporation
Elenon Set -vices Divisloll
/
�\
/
,
� � �
:/�
.j�\�
\�� \�
j
z%
� � � \� � �� �
� �
Business Records Corporation
Elenon Set -vices Divisloll
• VARLABIE WBJIFULEM M BAUX)T The
OPTECH 111•P reads single. double or triple column
ballot Widths with only a simple adjustment. printing
is single color on both front and back Ballots are
easily readable and can vary In length from 14' to
over 20: OPTECH 111-P ballot size flexibility translates
into dramatically reduced printing costs for each
election.
• EASY 10 USE The voter simply completes the
arrow pointing to his/her choice and Inserts the
ballot (any orientation/ in the OPTECH IMP In less
than one second. OPTECH automatically counts each
vote. stores the information In the BRC Memorypeck.'
updates the precinct totals. and directs the ballot to
the proper ballot box. Blank. write -In and overvoted
ballots an be automatically separated by the com-
puter with a simple switch selection Overvoted
ballots an be returned to the voter for correction, if
desired The public counter displays the number of
processed ballots.
When the polls close. precinct totals are printed out
by Inserting a key into the control panel and rotating
It a quarter tum. The alpha!numerlc printout pre•
sents the office title. candidate names and their
respective vote totals in -two colors for easy reading.
Business Records Corporation. the
�7 ,s
largest voting equipment manufac-
turer in the United States, is proud to
present the OPTECH 111-P. now you
can have all the speed and flexibility
of a state-of-the-art computer coupled
-
to a smart. easy-to-use voter actuated
ballot tabulating system.
• VARLABIE WBJIFULEM M BAUX)T The
OPTECH 111•P reads single. double or triple column
ballot Widths with only a simple adjustment. printing
is single color on both front and back Ballots are
easily readable and can vary In length from 14' to
over 20: OPTECH 111-P ballot size flexibility translates
into dramatically reduced printing costs for each
election.
• EASY 10 USE The voter simply completes the
arrow pointing to his/her choice and Inserts the
ballot (any orientation/ in the OPTECH IMP In less
than one second. OPTECH automatically counts each
vote. stores the information In the BRC Memorypeck.'
updates the precinct totals. and directs the ballot to
the proper ballot box. Blank. write -In and overvoted
ballots an be automatically separated by the com-
puter with a simple switch selection Overvoted
ballots an be returned to the voter for correction, if
desired The public counter displays the number of
processed ballots.
When the polls close. precinct totals are printed out
by Inserting a key into the control panel and rotating
It a quarter tum. The alpha!numerlc printout pre•
sents the office title. candidate names and their
respective vote totals in -two colors for easy reading.
■ SWMFIED TRANSPORTATION and
STORAGE Pollworkers will appreciate the light
weight convenience offered by the OPfECH 111•P unit.
Election administrators will save money in handling,
transportation, and storage. All supplies including
ballot bot and the twenty pound OPTECH 111-P unit
are easily transportable in the precinct worker's
automobile. Optional cardboard ballot boxes are
available to further reduce storage costs and facilitate
transportation.
a SE"IAGNOSflCS—EASY to SERVICE
Set up at the precinct Is easily accomplished and
requires no technical skill. During the election pro-
cess the OPTECH 111•P unit performs numerous self•
checks for proper operation and, in the event of mal•
function, automatically prints out a message guiding
the pollworkers in what to do and prevents additional
ballots from being inserted. During such periods the
integral auxiliary ballot box compartment is utilized
so the election process may continue without Inter.
iptlon. In the unlikely event of a ballot jam, the
cardreader generally leaves some ponlon of the ballot
exposed. Thus the jam may normally be cleared by
the pollwor ker —avoid i ng the delay and expense of
dispatching a technician from election headquarters
EOUIPMENT
SPECIFICATIONS
SIZE -6' H x 17' W x 20' D.
SPEED—Scans ballot at 60' per second. Prints
totals immediately after close of polls.
BALLOT—Candidate names Issues, and write-in
positions arc clearly printed on the ballot. Available
in three widths: 3W.. 63/4. or 9JY:'. 14' to over 20'
in length and over 700 noting positions per ballot. May
be printed on white or colored stock. using single
color ink. Ballot may be printed on one or two sides
CAPACITY --up to 127 different ballot formam
2,000 voting positions and 16.000 votes per position.
REMOVABLE AU AORY The memorypack• is
a removable, battery sustained memory where all
tabulated totals are stored together with the pro-
tinct program.
POWER SOURCE—Household power, 115VAC
with provision for 12VDC battery operation in event
of power Ion or brown out.
WEIGHT—compact. lightweight (approximately
20 pounds) and portable for storage andlor transit.
ADDmONAL FEATURES
1. PRECINCT CONSOUOAYM: Precinct totals can
be easily transmitted from the Memorypack' to
the IBM PC" for precinct consolidation. Three
different printouts are available: canvass by pre-
cinct by contest. and by contest with precinct
detail.
2. SATELLITE COMMUNICATION: Specially equipped
tabutaton may communicate directly with the
election authority's central processor via standard
RS -232 interface.
3. AUDIT TRAIL Three separate audit tralls...battery
supported memory, tape printout and voted ballots,
4. BATTERY OPERATED: Vote totals will be retained
In memory even if power fails temporarily. If power
will be out for a long period of time, an optional
battery pack or any 12 volt automobile battery
may be used to power the system. Simply connect 0
an auxiliary power cable to the OPTECH 111•P unit
and continue operation without adjustment /
rte,.,•-�, � � '•�: �-�.�; �� < �:-�,:,;z _...�
-In
Business Records Corporadon ~ ~,
.c:"' --, •iti;>,li-..Fv.ib
Election Semces Division
�• '.blas.
P.O. Box 660002
Texas
.°iw�.-�t j xt,'• wry }i�.q.•y
75266-=
121q 686.1800 _ ..
'mr,. Kf'4t� `�nA!' J p,j'•�',,•�`•^�-�'�'`tic4�r"''f1��,
s itf, Pe4'y' , �� ata Wt... :�.;'+� u�• ?a.
Vis'• T .° 'r• _,` %', ��!'.;�i�• � "
recognized leader in
the industry, offers an unparalleled
✓ h,--
'- range of election equipment and 114s,,
services. A nationwide network of ^
known industry experts assist local
government in configuring a system
to meet your specific needs—for
today and into the future.
m Pur
cen
O Optical scan
OPTECH 111•F
OPTECH lll•C
staff
■ Complete printing services—
.:1 : ballot pageCidrnple ballots,
® Electronic system—V-2000 �.` ;I•-'%electlon forms absentee material
• National field service network
O Full-time installation and support team
O Ballot printing
O Complete line of supplies - vote
recorders, booths, demonstrators,
Assembly equipment, ballot boxes.
handicapped voting supplies
m Election preparation service
and election coding
/sorts ,. u S.
�r
'mr,. Kf'4t� `�nA!' J p,j'•�',,•�`•^�-�'�'`tic4�r"''f1��,
s itf, Pe4'y' , �� ata Wt... :�.;'+� u�• ?a.
Vis'• T .° 'r• _,` %', ��!'.;�i�• � "
recognized leader in
the industry, offers an unparalleled
✓ h,--
'- range of election equipment and 114s,,
services. A nationwide network of ^
known industry experts assist local
government in configuring a system
to meet your specific needs—for
today and into the future.
m Pur
cen
O Optical scan
OPTECH 111•F
OPTECH lll•C
staff
■ Complete printing services—
.:1 : ballot pageCidrnple ballots,
® Electronic system—V-2000 �.` ;I•-'%electlon forms absentee material
• National field service network
O Full-time installation and support team
O Ballot printing
O Complete line of supplies - vote
recorders, booths, demonstrators,
Assembly equipment, ballot boxes.
handicapped voting supplies
m Election preparation service
and election coding
/sorts ,. u S.
MINNESOTA OPTECH CLIENTS
XBuswEss REcows CoavoNnnav
MIDWEST COAVMIY
PAGE 1 or I
1 Ciry of Ada
63 City of New Brighton
102
Becker County
2 Clty of Albert lea
64 Clry of New. Hope
103
Benton County
3 City of Alexandria
65 City of Newport
104
Carlton County
4 City of Apple Valley
66 City of North oaks
105
Carver County
5 City of Arden HU13
67 City of North Saint Paul
106
Cass County
6 City of Bayport
68 City of Oakdale
107
Chippewa County
7 City of Bloomington
69 City of Orono
108
Clay Counry
8 City of Birchwood Village
70 City of Otsego
109
Crow Wing County
9 City of Brooklyn Center
71 City of PayncsvLlle
110
Dakota County
10 City of Brooklyn Pah
72 City of Plymouth
111
Freeborn County
1 1 City of Buffalo
73 City of Rice
112
Hennepin County
12 City of Burnsville
74 City of Richfield
113
Itasca County
13 City of Champlin
75 City of Rabbinedelle
114
Nobles County
14 City of Chanhassen
76 City of Rucheste
115
Plpestme County
15 City of Chisholm
77 City of Rockford
116
Ramsey County
16 City of Cold Spring
78 City of Rosemount
117
Rice County
17 City of Corcoran
79 City of Roseville
118
Stearn County
10 City of Cottage Grove
80 City of Saint Anthony
119
Washington Couny,
19 City of crystal
81 City of Saint Cloud
120
Wilkin County
20 City of Dayton
82 City of Sunt James
21 City of Deephaven
83 City of Saint Joseph
121
Alerandrta Township
22 City of Delano
84 City of Saint taus Park
122
Cubs Township
23 City of Dodge Center
85 City of Saint Paul
123
Dwn Township
24 City of Duluth
86 City of Sarte9
124
Forest take Township
25 City of Eagan
87 City of Sauk Centre
125
Gle dorado Townihlp
26 City of Eden Prattle
88 City of Sauk Rapids
126
Grand lake Township
27 City of Edina
89 City of Shoreview
127
LaGrande Township
28 City of Excelsior
90 City of Shorewood
128
langola Township
29 City of Falcon Heights
91 City of South Saint Paul
129
May Township
30 City of Farmington
92 City of Spring Park
130
Mlndon Township
31 City of Foley
93 City of Sullwater
131
New Stands Township
32 City of Forest Lake
94 City of Tonka Bay
132
Rockford Township
33 City of Golden Volley
95 City of Vadnals Heights
133
Saint Cloud Township
34 City of Hastings
98 City of Virginia
134
Saint Joseph
35 City of Hibbing
97 City of Waconla
135
Stillwater Township
36 City of Hopkins
98 City of Wayzata
136
Wakefield Township
37 City of Hoyt lakes
99 City of West Saint Paul
137
Watab Township
38 City of Hugo
100 City of White Bear lake
138
White Townshdp
39 City of Hut.-t,n.. n
101 City of Woodbury
139
While 13— Lake Ton slily
40 City of Independence
41 City of International Falls
140
Fort Snelling
42 City of liner Grove Heights
141
Teamsters Local $5"
43 City of IAsson
142
Teamsters local $B3H
44 City of lake 61mo
143
Twin City Fad UAW lacal $879
45 City of Lakeland
46 City of Lakeville
47 City of Lauderdale
48 City of Wydals
49 City of Little canads
So City of Long; Lake
I
51 City of Mahtomedl
....
52 City of Maple Grove
53 City of Maple Plain
54 City of Maplewood
55 City of Medlim
50 City of Mendota Heights
57 City of Minneapolis
I
1
58 City of Minnetonka
59 City of Mlnnetrtsta
60 City of Moorhead
,Of
61 City of Moundd
oun
I
62 qty of Maunrlavtew
I
*IBUSQrESS RECORDS
CORPORATION
Election Services Division
Business Records Corporation,,,,,-.. ,,,
the largest voting ,
equipment manufacturer ,
in the United States,
is proud to present the (�
OPTECH III -P
Now you can have the speed and flexibility
of a state -of -the art computer coupled to a smart,
easy-to-use voter actuated ballot tabulating system.
OPTECH III -P - The newest generation in Mark
Sense Vote Tabulation
A precinct level optical scan
system featuring maximum speed,
maximum security, minimum effort.
♦Variable Width/Length Ballot
♦Simplified Transportation and
Storage
♦Precinct Consolidation
♦Satellite Communication
♦Easy to Use
♦Self -Diagnostics
Easy to Service
♦Audit Trail
♦Battery Operated
0
OPTECH III -P
♦ VARIABLE WIDTH/ ♦ SIMPLIFIED
LENGTH BALLOT TRANSPORTATION and STORAGE
Reads single, double or triple column Pollworkers appreciate the light weight convenience of the
ballot widths. Ballots are easy to read OPTECH RI -P unit. Election administrators will save money in
and can vary in length from 14" to over handling, transportation, and storage. The unit and supplies are
20". Ballot size flexibility dramatically easily transportable by automobile. Optional cardboard ballot
reduces printing costs for each election. boxes are available to further reduce storage costs and facilitate
transportation.
♦ SELF-D[AGNOSTICS
Easy to Service
Set up at the precinct is easy and requires no technical skill. During the election process, the
OPTECH III -P unit performs self -checks for proper operation and, in the event of malfunction,
automatically prints out a message guiding the pollworkers in what to do, and prevents
additional ballots from being inserted. During such periods, the auxiliary ballot box compart-
ment is utilized -election process continues without interruption. In the unlikely event of a ballot
'Jam, the cardreader generally leaves some portion of the ballot exposed. Thus, the jam may
nortnally be cleared by the pollworker - avoiding the delay and expense of dispatching a
technician.
O EASY TO USE
The voter simply completes the arrow pointing to his/her choice and inserts
the ballot (any orientation) in the OPTECH I I I -P. In less than one second. OP -
TECH autorr]2tically counts each vote, stores the information in the BRC
Mernorypace updates the precinct totals, directs the ballot to the proper
ballot box. Blank, write-in and overvoted ballots can be automatically
separated by the computer with a simple switch selection. Overvoted ballots
can be retumed to the voter for correction, if desired. The public counter
displays the number of processed ballots.
When the polls close, precinct totals are printed out by inserting a key into the
control panel and rotating it a quarter tum. The alpha -numeric printout
presents the office title, candidate names, and their respective VOW mtals in
two colon for easy reading.
Equlpotertt Specifications
SUM •P H. IT r. 2V 0
♦ ADDITIONAL FEATURES
a►aO •Sow Ma.r. r Mr/. 1
P_.loW.iA "..Iy.n.r d—W
Iu
PRECINCT CONSOLIDATION: Precinct totals can be easilytut�r�c..m
—d.,Iy pnp-I.w
.nr. pamau.^ a..ey pwa ..,
transmitted from the Memorypacl!Ptothe IBM PC®forprecinct
ts•bab.A+"I;W �iLh.ast
consolidation. Three different pnntouts are available: canvass
s-' s sty', ;3�' It 1O — 20
by precinct, by contest, and by contest with precinct detail.
bre we- b. pnm Cdr cot•
.^e w.A. wn%.nal. cab uLL 0.11.
SAT LLITECOMMUNICATION:Specially equipped Stabula-
CAytepuaar.
wAar - uP�. to aw..bwu.
ton may communicate directly with the election authority's
wars LOW ..cry pou..s —t
centralrocessor via standard RS232 interface.
P
uoob.aea+p—
REMOVABLE MEMORY- tb.4.m.
ryp.oY.. r.ao.. tlr, d..ry .u.r.u.aV
AUDIT TRAIL Three separate audit trails... battery supported
ea-y.Ar..B ubrJw —1...
memory, tape printout, and voted ballots.
p ~ . u M�
.e
rosv[B soma - tt.vwr.,w p....
BATTERY OPERATED: Vote totals will beretainudinmemory
I„^_Nf°Mn;�P_ -
pw,+
even if power falls temporarily. If power will be out for a long
> b—we-. ,
nod of time, an optional bane pack or an 12 volt auotmo-
Pe P battery Pa Y
n1OG1fT ' to P. ` 61h.—P. M, I•r �-
pom.wy lop.,wl.oa p.wb UP
bile battery may be used to power the system.
«-.y..bir...
U
ISYS.. w.r+ne .rr..nn r Inrn„r..l Wow 11..Iu„w
Vr,,,en.,n ®.. r..r.we rrrrrw. r ■w.. 4.e-. C.Tuw
Council Agenda - 11/22/93
8. Consideration to review Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund (GMEFa
Loan No. 007 (Lawrence T. Demeules dha Standard Iron and Wire_
Works. Inc.) for compliance of the GMEF Guidelines. (O.K.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The EDA requests that City Council review GMEF Loan No. 007 for
compliance of the GMEF guidelines. The GMEF guidelines state: "The EDA
shall have authority to approve or deny loans; however, within 21 days of EDA
approval, the City Council may reverse a decision by the EDA to approve a
loan if it is determined by Council that such loan was issued in violation of the
GMEF guidelines."
On November 9, 1993, the EDA approved GMEF Loan No. 007 for Lawrence
T. Demueles, dha Standard Iron and Wire Works, Inc. subject to receipt of the
cash flow statements for verification of the company's ability to cover the
proposed debt service. Satisfied with the explanation of the company's ability
to cover the proposed debt service, the EDA determined the loan application
to he in compliance with the GMEF guidelines. For your review, enclosed as
supporting data is the project summary and the outline used by the EDA for
determination of GMEF public purpose and policy compliance.
The equipment loan was approved for $75,000 at a 5.0`:tfixed interest rate
amortized over seven years, Loan fee was set at $1,125 and the GMEF legal
fees the responsibility of the borrower. The GMEF, State Economic Recovery
Grant (ERG), and Central Minnesota Initiative Fund (CM1F) loans will share
a first Purchase Money on the Horizontal Machine Center. Collateral,
guarantees, and other condition requirements to he determined and prepared
by the GMEF attorney. The GMEF loan approval was subject to approval of
the State ERG and the CM IF.
The GMEF balance was $157,500 as of July, 1993, and, with the approval of
Loan No. 007, the remaining GMEF balance is $78,750.
After review of the EDA outline for GMEF public purpose and policy
compliance, Clio City Council is requested to consider the following actions.
Il. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
A notion stating that City Council has determined the EUA -approved
GMEF Loon No. 007 for Lawrence T. Derncules, dha Standard Iron and
Wire Works, Inc. was issued without violation of the GMEF Guidelines;
therefore, Council supporta the decision by the EDA for loan approval.
Council Agenda - 11/22/93
A motion stating that City Council has determined the EDA -approved
GMEF Loan No. 007 for Lawrence T. Demeules, dba Standard Iron and
Wire Works, Inc. was issued in violation of the GMEF Guidelines;
therefore, the Council reverses the decision by the EDA for loan
approval.
A motion to table action until the December 13 Council meeting. This
would violate the guideline for City Council to review within 21 days a
decision by the EDA for loan approval.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDAT;ON
Staff recommends alternative #I, as GMEF Loan No. 007 complies with the
GMEF guidelines. Standard Iron is viewed as a quality company and an asset
to the City of Monticello.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the EDA agenda project summary and GMEF criteria outline; Copy of
the preliminary loan application; Copy of the GMEF approval form.
EDA AGENDA
NOVEMBER 9, 1993
3. Consideration to review a oreliminary and formal GMEF
application for Lawrence T. Demeules dbs Standard Iron and
Wire Works, Inc.
The Standard Iron and wire Works, Inc. $1,870,00C real estate
closing was held on September 28 in St. Paul and the
Groundbreaking Reception was held on October 1, 1993. Since
the real estate financing which included Tax Increment
Financing (TIF), Small Business Administration (SBA), and bank
is history, I have not requested a representative from
Standard Iron be present at the EDA meeting.
The Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund (GMEF) request of
$75,000 is part of a package to finance a $450,000 Horizontal
Machine Center. The other sources of funds are State of
Minnesota, $250,000; Central Minnesota Initiative Fund (CMIF),
$100,000; and equity, $25,000. The applicant for the State's
$250,000 is Wright County since the State allows only one
application per governmental unit per state fiscal year. The
City of Monticello is the applicant of a $400,000 State
request to assist the H -Window Company expansion. The State
and CMIF applications for Standard Iron were submitted the
week of October 25 with award approval anticipated in about a
month. The Machine Center will be owned by Lawrence Demeules
and leased to Standard Iron.
A second SBA, bank, and equity package will finance another
$805,000 of equipment.
A. Reference and Backoround:
GMEF LOAN APPLICATION REQUEST:
$75,000 equipment loan at 6% over ten years.
Uses of Funds
Horizontal Machine Center $450,000
TOTAL USES OF FUNDS $450,000
Sources of Funds
State of Minnesota (6%, 10 Years) $250,000
CMIF (6K, 10 Years) $100,000
GMEF (6%, 10 Years) $ 75,000
Equity $ 25,000
TOTAL SOURCES OF FUNDS $450,000
6
LAWRENCE T. DEMEULES. .
STANDARD IRON & WIRE WORKS, INC. .
EXECUTIVE SVA Y
Standard Iron & Wire Works, Inc. went into business in March of 1930 and
is a metal fabricating job shop. On August 28, 1946, the company was
incorporated as a C -corporation and has maintained that status to this date.
The founding owners were three brothers; H.Z. (Heine) Demeules, R.D.
(Rola) Demeules, and E.A. (Zez) Demeules. Later a fourth brother, J.A.
(Chuck) Demeules, joined the business.
From 1930 to 1941, the company's original market was miscellaneous metals
for commercial and industrial construction. During World War II there was
little construction being done, and as a result, the production facilities were
used to supply component parts to the defense industry. After the war the
company continued to fabricate parts for the OEM (Original Equipment
Manufacturing) market as well as the construction market. This
diversification has helped the company during economic downturns, since
historically the government has invested money in government construction
projects to stimulate the economy during depressed times.
0
Standard Iron currently has three locations and 135 employees, as follows:
Corporate Headquarters 38
4990 North Highway 169
New Hope, MN 55428
Sauk Centre Facility 64
West Sinclair Lewis Avenue
Sauk Centre, MN 56378
Alexandria Facility 33
1401 36th Avenue West
Alexandria, MN 56378
TOTAL EMPLOYEES 135
Through death, inheritance and buy-outs, Lawrence (Rusty) Demeules and
David Demeules, the sons of Heine, became equal partners on August 31,
1972. On December 31, 1986, Rusty purchased David's half interest in
Standard Iron. Today, Rusty is the majority stockholder (81 percent
ownership), with his three sons; Richard Demeules, Joseph Demeules, and
William Demeules, as minority stockholders (6 percent ownership each).
The proposed project is for purchase of equipment. Standard Iron custom
fabricates components from steel, aluminum and stainless steel. Because of
the many types of materials used and the wide range of products fabricated,
it is necessary to install a variety of equipment, ranging from simple manual
machines to sophisticated computer controlled machines that can punch,
plasma burn, bend, and weld.
As a result of this project, Standard Iron anticipates hiring an additional 17
full-time employees for office operations and 80 production employees,
creating a total of 97 new jobs within two years of project completion.
The equipment will be financed with a 10 -year SBA 504 loan and a separate
note from the City of Monticello, CMIF, and the. State of Minnesota via
Wright County. In addition, the company is proposing to finance the
building with a 20 -year SBA 504 loan. The proposed uses and sources of
funds for the equipment and building loans are as follows:
" wk -3m
Land $ 120,000
Site Improvements 194,000
Construction 1,556,000
Equipment 805-000
TOTAL 504 USES OF FUNDS $2,675,000
(3fiH'ER USES
Horizontal Machining Center
TOTAL USES OF FUNDS S3-125-000
Bank (ARM, 20 Years, lst) $ 856,000
SBA 504 (7%, 20 Years, 2nd) 700,000
Equity —11L OP.
TOTAL 504 BUILDING SOURCES OF FUNDS $1,570,000
sti'K: bll4s -. ��u1Ybr�:riV�y
Bank (8%, 10 Years, 1st M & E) $420,000
SBA 504 (6.5%, 10 Years, 2nd M & E) 300,000
Equity 85.000
TOTAL 504 EQUIPMENT SOURCES OF FUNDS 5805.000
TOTAL 504 SOURCES OF FUNDS $2,675,000
trtt:l allvK tU xU140's
State of Minnesota (6% 10 Years, 1st Purchase Money) $250,000
CMIF (6% 10 Years, 1st Purchase Money) 100,000
City of Monticello (6% 10 Years, 1st Purchase Money) 75,000
Equity —25,000
TOTAL OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDS $450,000
TOTAL SOURCES OF FUNDS S3,125,000
Bank - Building (Avg. 9%)
$7,705
$7,705
SBA - Building
5,427
5,427
Bank - Equipment
5,095
0
SBA - Equipment
3,406
0
State
2,775
0
CMIF
1,110
0
City
835
0
TOTAL MONTHLY
$26,353
$13,132
TOTAL ANNUAL
$316,236
$157,594
(73
Following is a review of the historical and projected levels of sales and
profitability of Standard Iron & Wire Works, Inc.:
YEAR
SALES
1990
$11,218,709
1991
$11,836,954
1992
$10,955,982
7/31/93'
$9,215,277
NET INCOME BEFORE' TAXES
$101,078
$345,168
S286,514
$242,255
[••• 61
1993 $10,363,089 $322,982
1994 512,563,089 $362,498
1995 $13,863,089 $340,818
1996 $15,588,089 _ $659,117 J
Represents financial performance for the 11 -months ending July 31,
1993. The company's fiscal year end is August 31.
NOTE: The large level of sales in 1992 and 1991 was due to the Mall of
America project which was completed in early 1992.
Debt -to -Worth Ratio
Based on the July 31, 1993 balance sheet the debt -to -worth ratio is 1.0:1.
The proforma debt -to -worth ratio is 2.5:1. The proforma debt -to -worth ratio
is calculated by accounting for the proposed facility and equipment on the
proforma balance sheet. The Sauk Centre, Alexandria, and New Hope
facilities are owned personally by Rusty Demeules and are not accounted for
on the proforma balance sheet for Standard Iron. The industry average debt -
to -worth ratio ranges between A:1 and 3.2:1.
v
Current Ratio
Based on the July 31, 1993 balance sheet, the current ratio is 2.0:1. The
proforma current ratio is 1.5:1. The industry average current ratio ranges
between 1.1:1 and 3.2:1.
Cash Flow Analysis
Based on fiscal year ending August 31, 1992 earnings before taxes of
S286,514, the cash flow coverage ratio is 1.5:1. Based on the earnings
forecast for fiscal year -ending August 31, 1994, the cash flow coverage ratio
is 2.2:1.
MANAG •MENT
Lawrence (Rusty) Demeules has been employed by the company since
March, 1966. He is currently the Chief Executive Officer, Chairperson of
the Board of Directors and Treasurer. Lawrence has also held the positions
of Sales Manager, Vice President and President.
Harold Ramsay has been employed by Standard Iron since 1958. He is
currently Executive Vice President of the company and Corporate Secretary.
Harold has also held the positions of Sales Manager, Draftsperson, and
Estimator. He attended the University of Minnesota Institute of Technology.
Frank Scott has been employed at Standard Iron since October, 1959. He has
been Plant Manager of the Sauk Centre facility since March, 1972. From
September, 1967 to March, 1972, Frank was Foreman in the machine shop.
Prior to September, 1967, he was Lead Man in the Long Span Department.
From October, 1959 to October, 1960, he was a First Class Mechanic.
Lee Fielder has been Plant Manager at the Alexandria Facility since August,
1989. From August, 1986 to August, 1989, he was Plant Manager for
Pipkorn Industrial Wire. He was Plant Manager for C.W. Olson, Inc. from
March, 1979 to July, 1986. Lee held a similar position with Iron Works,
Inc. from 1967 to 1974. Both C.W. Olson and the Iron Works were: in 111C
same field of work as Standard Iron.
O
James Moe joined Standard Iron as Accounting Manager in November, 1989;
he was promoted to Controller in January of 1993. Prior to this, Jim was an
auditor with the public accounting firm that performs the annual audit,
Boulay, Heutmaker, Zibell & Company. Jim has worked closely with the
company over his four years at Boulay as a member and leader of the audit
team. While with Buulay, Heutmaker, Zibeil, Tim was a member of their
Manufacturing Committee, a group that focuses on current accounting and
business issues related to manufacturing. Tim is a CPA and a graduate of the
University of Minnesota with a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting.
Richard Demeules has been with the company since December, 1986 when
he was hired as Accounting Manager. In January, 1990, he made a career
move into the position of Sales & Marketing. Richard received as Associate
of Arts degree in Accounting from North Hennepin Community College and
has a Bachelor of Science degree in Management from Cardinal Stritch
College.
Joseph Demeules has been with the company since June, 1986 when he was
hired as Purchasing Supervisor. He has been a member of the Twin City
Purchasing Association since June, 1983. He is currently working on his
Bachelor of Science degree in Management.
William Demeules serves as Technical Support at Standard Iron and has been
employed since June, 1983. Prior to his position as Technical Support,
William was a Sales Engineer, Assistant Plant Manager at the Alexandria
Facility and worked as a machine operator and welder at the New Hope,
Sauk Centre and Alexandria Facilities. William is a member of the American
Welding Society and has been a Certified Welding Inspector since 1986.
BORROWER/OWNERSHIP
Demeules Family Limited Partnership has been established to be the
ownership entity for the proposed facility in Monticello. The building will
be leased back to Standard Iron. Lawrence Demeules will own the
equipment personally and lease it back to the company. The ownership
structure of Standard Iron & Wire Works, Inc. and Demeules Family Limiir.rt
Partnership are as follows:
1-1
PERCENT OF
Lawrence Demeules
4,423
81%
Richard Demeules
339
6%
Joseph Demeules
339
6%
William Demeules
339
—.6x
TOTAL
5,440
100%
Harold Ramsay 375
Frank Scou 122
TOTAL 504
i�►1.�I:.'1.11•
Lawrence Demeules
4%
Richard Demeules
32%
Joseph Demeules
32%
William Demeules
32%
TOTAL
100%
Standard Iron is a long-standing, well-established family business. The
company's success over the last 63 years has been a result of manufacturing
quality products by a dedicated employment base and meeting customer
requests in a timely manner. Recognizing the importance of the construction
division to the success of Standard Iron, the company has refocused it's
marketing efforts to include a larger geographic market area. The company
has recently been rewarded with a sustained increase in sales in the increased
market area as a result of these efforts. The sales for the industrial products
division have also been steadily increasing and the company has increased its
sales staff to ensure that this continues. In response to the recent increase in
customer demands, Standard Iron has made the decision to expand its
manufacturing capacity. The proposed building and equipment project in
Monticello will enable the company to grow and meet customers demands.
OWN
EDA AGENDA
NOVEMBER 9, 1993
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY enclosed.
GREATER MONTICELLO ENTERPRISE FUND (GMEF1 GUIDELINES
PUBLIC PURPOSE CRITERIA: Must comply with four or more of the
criteria listed below, criteria #1
being mandatory.
1. Creates new jobs: 35 immediate new (37.5 hpw) jobs, 80
additional (37.5 hpw) jobs over
three years.
2. Increases the community tax base: Estimated Market
Value of $1,250,000
or estimated Tax
Capacity of $57,365.
3. Factors: Will assist an existing industrial business to
expand and relocate their operations. The
business and proposed project is compatible
with the comprehensive plan and existing
zoning policies. The company's product is not
available within the city and no potential
adverse environmental effects are anticipated.
•. Used as a secondary source of supplement conventional
financing: Although bank financing is not part of
the $650,0006, Horizontal Machine Center
package, of the $3,125,000 total package
Norwest Bank financed 60.83% or
$1,276,000.
5. Used as gap financing: Since about all other sources
of funds available are
structured in this deal and the
$75,000 GMEF is 2.6% of the
total $3,125,000 package, this
qualifies as gap financing.
6. Used to assist other funds: SBA, State, and Regional
Funds are being
requested.
Page 2
EDA AGENDA
NOVEMBER 9, 1993
GREATER MONTICELLO ENTERPRISE FUND POLICIES
I. BUSINESS ELIGIBILITY:
Industrial Uusiness: Yes.
Located within city limits: Yes, Zoned I-2.
Lots 7 & 8, Block 2, OIP
Credit worthy existing business: Yes, real estate
financing approved
with Norwest Bank
and SBA. Refer to
Executive Summary.
$10,000 loan per each job created or $5,000 per every
$20,000 in property market valuation, whichever highest:
$160,000 or $68,500, respectively.
Recommend: $75,000 GMEF approval.
II. FINANCING METHOD:
Participation Loan: The State, CMIF, and GMEF will share
a 1st Purchase Money on the
Horizontal Machine Center.
III. USE OF PROCEEDS:
Equipment - Horizontal Machine Center.
IV. TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
Loan Size: Maximum not to exceed 50% of the
remaining GMEF balance. Balance July
1993, $157,500. Maximum loan size,
$78,750.
Page 3
V
EDA AGENDA
NOVEMBER 9, 1993
Leveraging: Minimum 60% private/public non-GMEF.
Maximum 30% GMEF. Minimum 10% equity of
GMEF loan.
TOTAL FRO.iECT
Bank $1,276,000 (40.63%)
SBA $1,000,000 (32.00%)
TSF/EQUITY$ 314,000 (10.04%)
STATE $ 250,000 ( 6.00%)
CMIF $ 100,000 ( 3.20%)
GMEF $ 75,000 ( 2.40%)
EQUITY $ 110,000 ( 3.40%)
TOTAL HORIZONTAL MACHINE
STATE $ 250,000 (55.55%)
CMIF $ 100,000 (22.22%)
GMEF $ 75,000 (16.66%)
EQUITY $ 25,000 ( 5,55%) (33.33%)
Loan Term: Equipment amortized over 7 years. State
and CMIF loans to be amortized over 10
years, ballooned in 7 years.
Recommend: Amortize over 7 years.
Interest Rate: Fixed rate not less than 2% below
Minneapolis primo rate.
Recommend: 5.0% interest rate.
Loan Fee: Minimum fee of $200 but not to exceed
1.5% of total loan project. 075,000 x
.015 0 $1,125.
Recommend: $1,125.
Prepayment Policy: No penalty for prepayment.
Deferral of Payment: 1. Approval of the EDA
membership by majority vote.
2. Extend the balloon if
unable to refinance,
verification letter from two
lending institutions subject to
Board approval.
Page 4
■
EDA AGENDA
NOVEMBER 9, 1993
Interest Limitation on Guaranteed Loans:
Subject to security and/or reviewal by EDA.
Assumability of Loan: None.
Business Equity Requirements: Subject to type of loan
as determined by the EDA.
Collateral: Mortgage deeds, securities, and/or
guarantees as per the GMEF attorney.
Non-performance: The approved GMEF loan shall be null
and void if funds are not drawn upon
or disbursed with 120 days from date
of EDA approval.
Recommend: Approved GMEF shall
be null and void on
March 9, 1996.
GMEF legal fees: Responsibility of the GMEF
applicant.
B. Recommendation
Recommendation is to review the enclosed information prior to
the EDA meeting for discussion and potential questions.
Consideration to approve GMEF is the next agenda item.
C. Suonortina Data:
1. Copy of the preliminary GMEF application from L. T.
Demeules.
2. Description of the Horizontal Machine Center.
3. Copy of the executed Release of Information forms.
d. Copy of the formal GMEF Checklist.
5. Copy of the site location.
Supporting Data On -hand:
1. State Economic Recovery Grant Application.
2. CMIF Application.
3. Private Redevelopment Contract between the Demeules
Limited Partnership and the HRA.
Page 5
NO
GREATI-11 MCNT---C LLO ENT"=L-SE
250 EAST BROADWAY
MDNTICELLO, MINNESOTA
PRELL`TINARY APPLICATICN PCR LOAN
APPLIC.AIJT: L.T. "RUSTY" DEMEULES
PIR[! OR ^?ADE NAME: STANDARD IRON AND WIRE WORKS. INC.
BUS' .NESS ADDRESS:I EAPOLIS, MN 55428-4083
A b St.eet) (C-ty 6 State) (Zip Ccde)
T---Z!"-C:TE: BUSMMSS (61b 531-11 iD zcm! ( )
DAME ESTABLISHED: 1930 E142LOM I.D. j: 41-0652355
SOLE PROPRIETOR X CORPORATION PAR;4ERSdT_?
MANAGc""I=
NAME =2 OWNERSE7P
L. T. Demeules President 81:
Harold Ramsay Vice President
Joseph Demeules Materials Manager 6%
Richard Demeules Sales -& Marketing Manager 6%
William Demeules Technical Support Manager 6%
PROJECT LO0TION: LOTS 7 AND A RTOrF 7 nAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, MONTICELLO
NEN BUSINESS EXISTINTG BUSINESS RELOCATION AND EXPANSION
TOTAL PRC.-ECT' COST ESTIMATE: $ i_T25_nnn
PROPOSED USES: RECOEST:
LAND S I7n nnn AMOUNT OF LOAN 575.000
EXISTING BUILDING MATURITY & TERM
CONSTRUCTION I.75n_non REQUESTED 62 OVER 10 YEARS
MAC3!'W—v CAPITAL 1 255 nnn APPLICANT'S =25,000 of
WORKING CAPITAL EQUITY
OTSER LOAN PURPOSE 1450.000 H_ORIZONTAI
TOTAL USES $1 1)5 nnn MACHINING CENTER
PROPOSED BEGINNING DATE'��ARR 1199v
ESTIMAED TakTL@TION DA."E: ApRTI in T99/
TITLE TO
PROJECT ASSETS TO BE GELD BY: OPERATING ENTITY ALTER EGO
PARTICIPATING LENDER: NorFwest Bnnk
INamef (Address)
(contact Person) ('reiepnone u
PRESENT i OF EM!PLOYEES: 35 PROJECTED 1 OF VTLOYEES 115
ADDITIONAL PPDJECT INFORMATION:
APPLICANT SIGNATURE: r� r DATE
� U
APPROVAL OF
GREATER MONTICELLO ENTERPRISE FUNDS
BY
ECONOMIC DEVELPMENT AUTHORITY
IN AND FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
Preliminary Lean Application Approval.. YES
Loan terms negotiated and agreed upon
betweeen the developer, the lending
institution, and the EDA Executive Director. BANK CLOSING - SEPTEMBER 28, 1993
Formal Loan Application and Financial
Statements analyzed by the lending
institution, BDS, Inc. or city staff. YES
Building and Site Plan Preliminary and/or SITE FINAL
Final Review. AS OF 11-4-93 BUILDING PRELIMINARY
Building Permit approval or construction FOOTINGS, FOUNDATION, EXTERIOR WALLS,
commitment. AS OF 11-4-93 ROOF, AND FLOOR PERMIT.
Loan documents reviewed and/or prepared
by the City Attorney.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL:
LOAN NUMBER GMEF LOAN NO. 007 LOAN APPROVED YES
BORROWER LAMnchLC ,. uLmt LES unS STANDARD IRON AND WIRE WOKKS, LNG.
ADDRESS 4YYU NUK1M KLLMMAT IWO, MINNEAPOLIN DISAPPROVED
LOAN AMOUNT $15,000 hQMOM"L MN 55428-4083
RATE 5.0% FIXED INTEREST RATE DATE NOVEMBER 9, 1993
TERMS AMORTIZE OVER 7 YEARS
FEE $1,125 TO BE PAID AS TIME OF CHEF DISBURSEMENT.
GMEF LEGAL FEES RESPONSIBILITY OF THE BORROWER. OTHER �•
A motion was made by EDA Commissioner BARBARA SCHWIENTEK • to
(approve - Vd") Greater Monticello Enterprise Funds in the
amount of SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS AND NO CENTS -------------dollars
and cents to developer LAWRENCE I. LIEMEULES UKA SIANOAKU LKUN AND WIRE WORKS, INC.
this 9th day of NOVEMBER IYYJ Seconded
by EDA Commissioner AL LAKSON
YEAS: BARBARA SC14WIENTEK
AL LARSON HARVEY KENDALL
RON HOGLUND
BOB MOSFORD
PATTY OLSEN
GMEF disbursed
NAYS; NONE ABSENT:
CLINT HERBST
19 _ by Check No.
BDA Treasurer
CITY COUNCIL MAY REVERSE AN EDA LOAN DECISION WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
DAYS OF BDA APPROVAL. NOVEMBER 22, 1993
a
GMEF Approval
Page 2
ACCEPTANCE OF TERMS
I LWK)' hereby accept the terms stated above as approved by the
Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Monticello.
DATED:
LAWRENCE T. DEMEULES DBA STANDARD IRON AND
WIRE WORKS, INC.
* MOTION WAS SUBJECT TO RECEIPT OF THE CASH FLOW STATEMENTS FOR VERIFICATION OF
THE COMPANY'S ABILITY TO COVER THE PROPOSED DEBT SERVICE. EDA SATISFIED WITH
EXPLANATION OF THE COMPANY'S ABLILITY TOCOVER THE PROPOSED DEBT SERVICE,
NOVEMBER 22, NOON.
•• OTHER: THE GMEF WILL SHARE FIRST PURCHASE MONEY ON THE HORIZONTAL MACHINE CENTER
WITH THE STATE ECONOMIC RECOVERY GRANT AND THE CENTRAL MINNESOTA INITIATIVE
FUND.
COLLATERAL, GUARANTEES, AND OTHER CONDITION REQUIREMENTS TO BE DETERMINED
AND PREPARED BY THE GMEF ATTORNEY.
APPROVED CHEF LOAN NO. 007 WAS SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF THE STATE AND CMIF.
IF APPROVED GMEF LOAN NO. 007 DOLLARS OF $75,000 ARE NOT DISBURSED BY
MARCH 9. 1996, THE APPROVED LOAN BECOMES NULL AND VOID.
I
Council Agenda - 11/22/93
9. Consideration of renewine garbage contract with Vasko Rubbish
Removal. Inc.. (J.S. )
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Our current 3 -year contract with Vasko for garbage pickup (no disposal
costs) expires on thv last pickup day of March 1994. It is the City's past
policy to negotiate its garbage contracts approximately five or six months
before they expire. The primary reason for this is that should the
negotiations prove unsuccessful as they were with our last contractor, a
significant amount of lead time is often needed for contractors to gear up
and give the best possible prices in a new bid. The City Administrator and
myself have had two meetings with Matt Pflugi of Vasko Rubbish Removal,
Inc., to discuss the renewal of the contract and possible changes. Changes
to the contract were relatively minor. We added our current policy of
placing a sticker on garbage that has recyclables in it and the option of
leaving garbage at curbside that has recyclables in it. The contract now
allows us to exercise this option occasionally or on a permanent basis with
no additional cost increase.
We have negotiated what we feel is a very favorable contract for the City of
Monticello. Our last 3 -year contract was for a fixed amount. Once a week
pickup for single family through triplex was $3.80 a month. Twice a week
pickup for 4-plex and above apartment units was $4.73 a month. The
contract enclosed for your review is for a 10% increase beginning in April of
1994 and an additional 3% in April of 1995 and April of 1996. The
following is u tabulation of proposed rates.
Single Family 4-plex and
Effective Date thry Triplex Above
April 1994 $4.1Wmonth $5.20/month
April 1995 $4.31/month $5.36/month
April 1996 $4.44/month $5.52/month
Our current annual contract cost with Vasko, less state sales tax, is
approximately $99,300 per year. The new contract would represent an
increase of $9,930 for the year beginning April 1994. It is interesting to
note that even with the increases, our 1996 annual costs are still thousands
of dollars per year below the second bidder for Vasko's current contract back
in 1990.
Council Agenda - 11/22/93
The 3r/ increases for Vasko in 1995 and 1996 are based upon the CPI
staying within a range of 21/, to 5 1/21k. Should the CPI fall below 21% or
increase beyond 5 1/2%, we will negotiate a decrease or increase with Vasko
should we be able to demonstrate a decrease in Cheir cost. or they be able to
demonstrate an increase in cost above the 3%.
R. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative is to approve the new 3 -year contract with Vasko
Rubbish Removal, Inc., as outlined.
2. The second alternative would he to approve the concept of the 3 -year
contract but fix the 1995 and 1996 cost increases at 3% without
adjustment should the CPI fall below 2% or above 5 1/2%. We may
be able to negotiate this section of the contract further. A similar
section, however, is included with our contract with Professional
Services Group for operation of our wastewater treatment plant, and
we have found it not to be a problem, especially in these times of low
CPI increases.
3. A third alternative would be to negotiate further with Vasko should
the Council feel that they wish to add sections to the contract or are
concerned about the increases.
4. A fourth alternative would be to draft specifications and re -bid the
garbage contract. Since we are generally pleased with the service of
Vasko in the past and their willingness W look at improvements to
the system, and staff is of the opinion that the new contract prices
are well within reason, it may not he in our best interest to re -bid.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the City Administrator and Public Works
Director that the City Council approve the new 3 -year contract extension as
enclosed.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of new proposed contract for garbage services.
AGREEMENT
This AGREEMENT is between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a governmental
subdivision of the State of Minnesota, thereinafter referred to as CITY, and Vasko
RahhiRh Remnvnl, hereinAfter referred to as HAULER.
WHEREAS, the CITY desires garbage and refuse pickup and hauling for all
its residents from cans, 65/90 -gallon roll -around containers, or dumpsters on a
contract at a monthly rate for orderly and reliable pickup service and hauling of
refuse to a designated disposal facility, etc., thereof, without the responsibility of the
CITY maintaining staff and equipment for said purpose; and
WHEREAS, the HAULER is organized to and desirous of carrying out such
CITY wants and desires and has adequate equipment, assistance, and know-how to
carry out said project;
NOW, TH EREFORE, IT IS AGREED, in consideration of the mutual promises
of the CITY and HAULER:
1. PAYMENT
A. That CITY shall pay HAULER to pick up once per week all
existing units-the4u (single family
through triplex) at a unit coal of $4.18 per month, end
including other miscellaneous pickups and services as specified
and tlmA*mp-semi of$a,8b2,80 twice per week (ter all fourplex
and greater apartments) at a unit cost of 08.20 per month
starting on the last pickup day of April, 4884 1894, and each and
every month thereafter on the last collection day of each said
GARBAGE.AGR: 11/18/9:1 page 1 0
month for the term of this AGREEMENT, unless the
AGREEMENT is terminated by either party as set forth in this
AGREEMENT, said sum shall be for the number of dwellings in
the City. The monthly payment shall not include current or
future surcharge or dumping fees incurred by the HAULER at the
nearest City -approved disposal facility but shall include all
currently applicable state and federal taxes on collection. The
state (score) sales tax on collection may be added to the bill as per
state law. The landfill or disposal fees shall be paid by the City
or reimbursed to the hauler at the City's option.
U. Prior tu each monthly payment, the HAULER shall provide to the
CITY documentation of total cubic yards and tonnage hauled
during the previous month on a form supplied by the City.
Documentation shall be based on daily records, including driver
identification, truck number, disposal location, and tonnage/yards
dumped.
C. Any additional residences picked up by the HAULER upon the
request of the CI'T'Y will he added to monthly payment at $4M
$4./8 per single family residence, with apartment units (fourplex
and greater) added at the rate of $" $5.20 per unit through
April 1, 1998. On April 1, 1995, the rates will increase 3%
to $4.31 and $8.36, respectively, until April 1, 1996, at which
GARBAGE.AGR: 11/18/93
Page 2 (V
time the rates shall increase another 3% to $4.44 and $5.52,
respectively. Should the CPI* annual increase be less than
231 or more than 5.591 on April 1, 1995, or April 1, 1996, the
C= and HAULER shall negotiate an a4justment in rules
other than those indicated Additional residences and
apartments will be added to the monthly payment at the end of
the month and will be determined by the number of certificates
of occupancy issued during the month. Counting will begin the
month following execution of this contract. Mobile homes,
duplexes, and triplexes shall also be counted as single family
residences per dwelling unit.
1
2. TERM OF AGREEMENT
This AGREEMENT shall remain in force for a period of three (3) years
beginning on the first day of April, 1881 1994, and ending on the last
day of March, 4994 1997, unless otherwise terminated in accordance
with this AGREEMENT. This AGREEMENT may be renewed at any
time before its natural termination by the written mutual consent of
both parties and resolution by the CITY.
The LaLtip ckun shall be April 1, 1891 4, 1994. Immediately upon
execution of this contract, Hauler shall furnish City with such
performance bond or approved letter of credit as specified under
paragraph 8 herein.
*Consumer Price Index for all urban consumer (U.S. city average) as
published by the U.S. Public of Labor Bureau of of Labor Statiatica.
GARBAGE.AGR: 11/18/93 page 3
3. TERMINATIONS
This AGREEMENT may be terminated by the contractor with or
without cause upon a six -months' written notice to the City of
Muuticellu. This AGREEMENT may be terminated by the City of
Monticello with or without cause upon a 90 -day written notice to the
contractor.
4. INSURANCE
That HAULER shall carry public liability insurance with a recognized
insurance carrier and keep in force at all times during this
AGREEMENT the following minimum of coverage:
A. General Liability
1. General Aggregate, $1,300,000
2. PRODS - COMP/OPS Aggregate, $650,000
3. Each Occurrence, $660,000
4. Fire Damage (any one fire), $50,000
B. Auto Liability
1. Bodily Injury (per person), $300,000
2. Bodily Injury (per accident), $600,000
3. Property Damage, $100,000
C. Worker's Compensation and Employer's Liability
5. SCOPE OF WORK
A. That HAULER shall not be required to pick up and dispose of any
refuse or garbage that is not placed in a container or bagged or
bundled by the resident and that HAULER shall not be required
to use shovels in the loading thereof. Further, the service herein
GARBAGE.AGR: 11/18/93 Page 4
contemplated and provided for shall be furnished only to the
residents within the present corporate limits of the city.
Q. That HAULER agrees to a once a week pickup of all garbage and
refuse at curb -side for each single family through tri plex
residence in said CITY and twice -a -week pickup of all 4-plex and
above multiple residences in the city, including small amounts
of branches, twigs, or garden waste i/ placed in a can,
bagged, or tied (until prohibited at the landfilij if ent R1
and to dispose of the same
at a designated landfill or disposal facility. This service extends
only to residential property and not to commercial or industrial
enterprise, except for City property listed in Paragraph 5(D). If
the hauler picks up any other city residential garbage on the
City's pickup days not covered by this contract, he or she shall
report and deduct the landfill or disposal facility fees
appropriately. Prior to pickup of the City's residential refuse, all
trucks shall be empty. At no time shall a truck pick up non-
contract garbage until it has been weighed and emptied at the
landfill or disposal facility. The days of service shall he Monday
and Thursday. The HAULER can negotiate with any resident
GARBAGE.AGR: 11/18/93 Page 5
with regard to the placement of the garbage and an increased
number of pickups per week. HAULER shall acceptebleasb three
33 -gallon containers per household per week.
C. Individual non -automated garbage containers must not exceed 33
gallon capacity and should be equipped with handles for ease of
handling. Plastic garbage bags are ideal for use of storing
garbage. Paper bags are not permissible unless inside a proper
container. Sturdy cardboard disposable cartons may be used for
non -garbage refuse.
D. Miscellaneous Citv Prouertv
That HAULER shall include in the base bid the requirement to
provide, maintain, and empty twice weekly or once weekly as
necessary garbage dumpsters at the following locations:
Minimum 1-1/2 cubic vard
1. City Maintenance Building --W. Co. Rd. 39 (Year Round)
2. 4th Street Park - Year Round
:1. West Bridge Park - Year Round
4. Ellison Park - May 1 through November I
fi. Sewage Disposal Plant - Year Round
G. Municipal Off -Stile Liquor Store - Year Round
Minimum 3 cubic yard
1. NSP Softball Fields - ( May 1 - October 1)
The HAULER shall provide one extra garbage dumpster for West
Bridge Park and two garbage dumpsters for Ellison Park for
Riverfest in July of each year, containers to be at least G cubic yards.
GARBAGE.AGR: 11/18/93 Page 6 0
The HAULER shall also provide weekly garbage pickup at the
following City facilities:
1. Museum/information Center
2. City Hall
3. Library
4. Fire Hall
5. Senior Citizen Center
6. Old Fire Hall
and also empty a maximum of eight (8) litter containers at various
sidewalk locations in the downtown area once weekly or more often
as needed.
The HAULER shall, in addition to the regular garbage/refuse,
provide pickup of "screenings" twice weekly at the municipal
wastewater treatment facility. The screenings shall be double
bagged and placed in the garbage dumpster. It is understood that
the bags are not "leakproof"
E. That the following are legal holidays:
New Years Day
Memorial Day
Independence Day
Labor Day
Thanksgiving Day
Christmas Day
If HAULER is providing once a week pickup which falls on one of the
above holidays, arrangements shall be made by the HAULER for
pickup on another date that week.
F. The HAULER shall notify the CITY of each occurrence when articles
placed out for collection are not picked up due to their being beyond
GARBAGE.AGR: 11118/93 page 79
the scope of this agreement (e.g. mattresses, appliances, hot ashes,
etc.). HAULER shall, to the best of their ability, provide address,
name of customer, and nature of article not accepted for pickup.
HAULER may negotiate independently with customer for collection
of any articles that fall beyond the scope of this agreement. Any
extra fees so charged shall be reported monthly to the City listing
resident, material, article, quantity, amount charged, and date. If
the items are not typical household garbage, the HAULER must pay
the disposal fee.
6. SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A. The HAULER shall not pick up grass clippings at curb -side unless
they are contaminated with garbage. The HAULER shall report to
the CITY each time he or she picks up such a mixture, and the CITY
will notify the resident such a practice will not continue.
B. As part of this contract, the HAULER will pick up leaves at curb -side
only three (3) times per year and transport them to the City's
compost facility on the west end of town. The date and time of the
pickups shall be as mutually agreed to by the HAULER and CITY.
The HAULER shall pick up and report mixtures
of leaves and garbage as they occur. The CITY shall notify the
resident such a practice will not continue.
C. The HAULER, in cooperation with the City's recycling program, shall
report to the CITY any dumpsters which routinely contain significant
amounts of recyclable items such as newspaper, glass containers, ��%)
GARBAGE.AGR: 11/18/99 Page 8 0
plastic bottles, and cans, or other items recycled with the City's
program. The location, date, type, and approximate amount of
.recyclable material shall be noted.
At the Cilv's direction, the i1AULER shall, at no additional
cost, 'sticker" (provided by the City) garbage containers
containing recyclables and/or leave garbage at curbside until
the recyclables have been removed or directed to pick up by the
City.
7. DUMPSTER RENTAL
The HAULER shall provide, when requested by apartment building owner,
covered rental dumpsters, including maintenance', for residential property
at the following rates:
1.1/2 cu. yd.
$13.00/month.
2 cu. yd.
$17.00/month.
3 cu. yd.
$17.00/month.
4 cu. yd.
$26.00/month.
G cu. yd. $30.00/month.
'Contractor maintenance shall include covers, wheels, routine cleaning, and
paint to the degree as determined reasonable by the CITY OF
MONTICELLO.
The HAULER must, as part of this contract, pick up and dispose of all
residential garbage, including that from multiple unit apartments. These
owners can provide their own containers or may elect to rent containers.
GARDAGE.AGR: 11/18/93 Pago 9
8. PERFORMANCE BOND
HAULER shall furnish CITY, as a condition to his receiving consideration
under. this contract as set out in Article 1, a performance bond or approved
letter of credit; said bond or letter shall remain in force during the tens of
this AGREEMENT and shall be placed with a bonding company or bank
acceptable to CITY. Said bond or letter shall be payable to the CITY OF
MONTICELLO and shall be in the amount of one-half annual value of the
contract.
9. DISPOSAL
It is the obligation of the 14AW ER CITY to direct the HAULER for to
obtain prepep disposal at the nearest approved facility for the refuse,
garbage, etc., and pickup matter, and thepe is Fie Pespensibility efany 16
to pay
or reimburse the disposal cost at the nearest approved facility.
10. ASSIGNMENT
This AGREEMENT may not be assigned in whole or in part without the
written consent of the CITY.
11. GENERAL
This AGREEMENT contains the entire AGREEMENT between the
HAULER and the CITY and may be amended only by the mutual consent
of CITY and HAULER in writing.
12. WAIVER
A waiver of one part of righta of either party is not a waiver of all the
rights that may accrue to either party.
GARBAGE.AGR: 11/18/93 Page 10
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT on the
date of
ATTEST: CITY OF MONTICELLO
By:
Rick Wolfsteller Ken Maus
City Administrator Mayor
(CITY SEAL)
VASKO RUBBISH REMOVAL
By:
GARBAGE.AGR: 11/18/93
Page 11
Council Agenda - 11/22/93
11. Closed session with Citv Attornev to discuss status of current
litigation. (R.W.)
City Attnrney, Paul Weingarden, has requested that the Council meet for a
few minutes at the end of the Council meeting to discuss in a closed session
the status of the litigation going on concerning the Westside Market
rezoning issue.
On Friday, November 19, 1993, Mr. Weingarden and the opposing legal
counsel presented their final arguments to the judge, each requesting a
summary judgment in their favor. At this point, if the ruling is in our
favor, that will be the end of the issue. If a summary judgment is not
granted in our favor, the case will then likely proceed to trial. 1 believe Mr.
Weingarden felt it would be a good time to update the Council on the
current status and to see if there is any room for negotiations prior to a
judge's ruling. Mr. Weingarden will present additional information at the
closed session of the Council on Monday night.
I
I
EPC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
1'0/29/63 09:56:00
WARRANT DATE VENOOR
GENERAL CHECKING
35629 10/29/93 74N DEPART OF REVENUE
35829 10/29/93+N3 OCPART OF REVCNUE
35829 10/29/93 MN OEPART OF REVENUE
35830 10/29/93 MN DEPART OF NATURAL
35931 1,0/20/93 M11 DEPART OF NATURAL
35832 10/29/93 UNITED STATES CELLUL.
35832 10/20/93 UNITED STATES CELLUL
35832 10/29/93 UNITED STATES CELLUL
35833 10/29/93 MARCO BUSINESS PP.00V
35833 u0/20/03 MARCO BUSINESS PROOU
35834 10/20/93 BRAUN INTERTEC ENVIO
35835 10/29/93 FEDERAL EXPRESS
35838 10/29/93 U.S.. POSTMASTER
35836 10/29/93 U.S. POSTMASTER
35837 10/20/93 CITY OF MONTICELLO
35838 10/29/93 MN DEPART OF NATURAL
35839 10/29/93 MN DEPART OF NATURAL
35840 10/29/93 LATOUR CONSTRUCTION
35841 10/20/03 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOP C
35841 10/29/93 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOP C
35841 10/20/83 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOP C
35842 10/29/03 MONTICELLO CHAMBER 0
35843 10/29/99 ROCWON CORPORATION
35844 10/29/03 ROChON CORPORATION
GENERAL CHECKING
01 soursertient Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
119 SALES TAX 738.08
119 SALES TAX 40.63
119 SALES TAX 306.62
1.085.39
118 WATERCRAFT TITLES 20.00
118 WATER/SNOW/ATV REG- 4S3.00
758 TELEP40NE CHARGES 36.10
7.58 TELEPHONE CHARGES 11.14
759 TELEPHONE CHARGES 22.66
66 .00
106 CITY HALL OFFICE SUP 350.17
106 DICTAPHONE 11TC AG' -MT 355.00
705.17
838 PROF SERVICES/GILLE P 660.00
394 POSTAGE 13.00
210 POSTAGE/SEWER & WATER 115.09-
2.10 POSTAGE/SEWER B WATER 115.09
230.18
7'80 REIMS TO A/R WHALEY BI 71.80
119 WATERCRAFT TITLE 10.00
118 MATER/SNOW/ATV REG 481.00
485 CONST COSTS/HART 102.902.93
90 IND DEVELOP BANQUET T 150.00
89 _IND DEVELOP BANQUET TK 75.00
90 IND DEVELOP BANQUET TK 75.00
300.00
13'3 REG FEE/1003 EXPO 125.00
085 VEH STORAGE GARAGE 18.520.90
685 VEH STORAGE GARAGE 13.901.23
TOTAL 134.155.59
BRC SIraA:JCIA_ SYSTEM
ID/?9/93 15:55:?0
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
35845 11/03/93 AAA STRIPING SERVICE
35846 11/03/93 ANDERSON A ASSOCIATE
35841 11/03/93 AUTOMATIC GARAGE 000
35848 11/03/93 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
35849 11/03/93 BUSINESS WEEK SUBCRI
35850 11/03/3 DOUBLE 0 ELECTRIC
35851 11/03/93 GO'VERNM.NT TPAINING
35852 11/03/93 HERMES/JERRY
35853 11/03/93 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFIC
35854 11/03/93 HOLMES A GRAVEN
35854 11/03/93 HOLMES & GRAVEN
35855 11/03/93 LEONARD INC/A M
35855 11/03/93 LEONARD INC/A M
35858 11/03/03 MCOOWALL COMPANY'
35856 11/03/83 MCOOWALL COMPANY
35856 11/03/93 MCOOWALL COMPANY
35857 11/03/93 MOBIL.
35857 11/03/83 MOBIL
35858 11/03/93 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO
35859 11/03/93 MONTICELLO SENIOR Cl
35860 11/03/93 NORTHERN WATER WORKS
35881 11/03/03 O'NEILL/JEFF
35861 11/03/83 O'NEILI/JEFF
35881 11/03/03 O'NEILL/JEFF
Ois0ursement Journ-i
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT")
453 STREET STRIPING 603.72
10 SIGNS/STREET DEFT 454.96
260 REPLACE GAR DOORS/SHO 747.68
26 STANDARD IRON PROF 3.850.00
607 SUBSCRIPTION 37.95
90196 WARMING HOUSE REPAIRS 66.20
72 PEG FEE/C .;HUMAN/J ON 110.00
81 LIBRARY CLEANING CONT 2?7.50
65 GAS/FIR£ DEPT 44.37
86 LEGAL GEES/NAACO 945.30
86 LEGAL FEES/STANDARD 1.207.81
2.153.1 )
723 PAINT/PW INSPECTIONS 105.52
723 PAINT/STREET DEPT 39.00
144.52
111 FURNACE REP/LIBRARY 105.00
111 FUR6ACE REP/FIRE DEPT 246.00
111 FURNACE REP/CITY HALL 126.04
567.04
131 GAS/STREET DEPT 24.07
131 VEH REP PARTS/SEWER 73.80
98.77
185 ANIMAL CONTROL CONT 1.100.00
139 MONTHLY CONTRIBUTIO 2.833.33
773 WATER MTC SUPPLIES 384.88
161 MILEAGE EXPENSE 103.60
161 AWAIR PROGRAM EXPENSE 60.13
181 TELEPHONE REIMB EMPENS 18.84
192.0
35862 11/03/93 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 175 WWTP CONTRACT PYMT 30.421.;
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
{ 10/29/93 15:55:20
WARRANT DATE vEfjDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
35863 11/03/93 QUALITY LAWN MAINTEN
35864 11/03/93 SHELTON COMPANY
35865 11/03/93 SOUTHAM BUSINESS COM
35865 11/03/03 SOUTHAM BUSINESS COM
35866 11/03/93 STEPHENS-PECK..V.-C
35867 11/03/93 U SHIP INTERNATIONAL
35868 11/03/93 UNITED LABS
35869 11/03/93 WATERPRO SUPPLIES CO
35870 11/03/93 WRIGHT COUNTY RECORD
GENERAL CHECKING
t
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
319 MOWING CHARGES 35.00
269 SCANNaR HEADS/RECYCLI ?68.50
644 AO FOR BIDS/N.ONTI FORD 78.81
844 AO FOR BIOS/CHL6R-DEC 233.10
3 1 1 . 9 1
399 DEPUTY REGISTRA MANUAL 44.00
757 POSTAGE SHIPPING/WATER 3.95
455 GREASE/STREET DEPT 320.84
670 WATER METERS 3.036.29
254 RECORDING FEES/NAWCO 31.50
TOTAL 48.180.08
I
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM,
11/05/93
13:10:20
Disbursement Journal
WARRANT
DATE
V£NOOr
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
GENERAL
CHECKING
35871
11/06/93
WRIGHT COUNTY RECORD
254
RECORDING FEES/SR OAKE 19.50
35872
11/06/93
GLEN & LOIS POSUSTA
.90317
CEDAR ST EXTENSION
5.000.00
35873
11/06/93
GLEN & LOIS POSUSTA
.90317
£RNST MONEY/DUNDAS
2.000.00
35874
11/06/93
MN DEPART OF NATURAL
119
WATER/SNOW/ATV REG
721.00
35875
11/08/93
AME GROUP
8
SHOP $ GAR BLD SUPPLI 101.89
35876
11/08/93
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
63.02
35876
11/08193
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
59.48
35076
11/08/93
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
113.76
35876
11/08/93
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
29.93
35878
11/08/93
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
157.48
35876
11/08/93
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
45.92
35876
11/09/93
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
20.1$
35870
11/08/93
SP16GEWATER TELEPHON
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
57.65
35876
11/08/93
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
31.74
35870
11/08/93
BRIDGEWATER TELEPHON
24
TELEPHONE CHARGES
$55.95
1.465.68
35877
11/08/93
BUFFALO BITUMINOUS.
25
SAND. ETC. STREET$
542.72
35878
11/08/93
BUSINESS RECORDS COR
27
CHECKS PRINTED
452.80
35879
:1/08/93
0 $ K REFUSE RECYCLI
611
RECYCLING CONTRACT
2.364.05
35880
11/08/03
OYNA SYSTEMS
50
SHOP & GARAGE SUPPLIE 249.05
35881
11/08/93
FEEORITE CONTROLS. I
50
MISC PROF SERVICES/WAT 75.00
35881
11/08/93
FEEDRITE CONTROLS. I
56
MISC SUPPLIES
64.54
35881
11/08/93
FEEDRITE CONTROLS, I
50
CHEMICALS/WATER DEP
3.287.03
31427.37
3$882
11/08/93
GENERAL RENTAL CENTE
64
LIGHTED SIGN RENTED
50.85
35883
11/00/03
J M OIL COMPANY
95
GAS/STREET DEPT
026.10
35884
11/08/93
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA
98
MEMBERSHIP DUES
2.970.00
35885
11/09/03
LUKACH/JOHN
327
MILEAGE EXPENSE
73.42
35885
1t/09/93
LUKACH/JOHN
327
MILEAGE EXPENSE
24.47
35905
11/08/03
LUKACH/JOHN
327
MILEAGE EXPENSE
24.47
35865
11/08/93
LUKACH/JOHN
327
MILEAGE EXPENSE
24.47
146.83
35880
11/08/93
MINNEGA$CO
712
UTILITIES
44.0. !
35986
11/08/03
MINNEGASCO
772
UTILITIES
6.41
35008
11/08/93
MINNEGASCO
772
UTILITIES
16.19
31
C
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
11/05/93 13:19420
WARRANT DATE VENDOR
GENERAL CHECKING
35686 11/08/93 MINNEGASCO
35887 11/08/93 MN 38/400 USER GROUP
35888 11/08/93 OLSON. USSET.AGAN A
35888 11/08/93 OLSON, USSET.AGAN R
35889 11/06/93 PAGE LINK.
35889 11/08/03 PACE LINK
35889 11/08/93 PAGE LINK
35880 11/08/93 PAGE LINK
'35889 11/08/93 PAGE LINK
35880 11/08/03 PAGE LINK
35889 11/08/93 PAGE LINK
35889 11/08/93 PAGE LINK
35890 11/08/93 RIVERSIDE OIL
35891 11/08/93 ROYAL TIRE OF MONTIC
35891 11/08/93 ROYAL TIRE OF MONTIC
35892 11/08/93 SENTRY SYSTEMS
35893 11/08/93 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP
35803 11/08/03 SIMONSON LUMBER COMP
35894 11/08/93 STAR TRIBUNE
35895 11/08/93 U.S. POSTMASTER
35806 11/08/03 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVA
35898 11/08/93 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVA
35897 11/06/93 WOLFSTELLER/RICHARD
35898 11/08/93 WRIGHT COUNTY DEPT O
35899 11/08/93 WRIGMT-HENNEPIN COOP
GENERAL CHECKING
Disbursement Journal
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
772 UTILITIES
659.45
720.29
300 SEMINAR REGISTRATION
80.00
202 LEGAL FEES 4.592.50
292 LEGAL FEES
131.25
4.723.75
703 PAGER CHARGES
42.00
703 PAGER CHARGES
21.30
703 PAGER CHARGES
24.50
703 PAGER CHARGES
21.30
703 PAGER CHARGES
21.30
703PAGER CHARGES
21.30
703 PAGER CHARGES
21.30
703 PAGER CHARGES
21.30
194.90
408 GAS/STREET DEPT
84.75
227 MTC OF FIRE DEPT VEHIC 09.58
227 MTC OF STREET VEHICLE
114.53
184.11
188 FIRE ALARM MTC/FIRE 0
128.00
193 SHOP & GAR BLD MTC SU
131.52
103 PW INSPEC SUPPLIES
38.87
170.39
187 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
10.50
210 POSTAGE FEES
150.00
S24 GARBAGE CONTRACT 8.337.82
524 SALES TAX/GARBAGE CON
835.02
8.873.24
217 MISC EXPENSE 85.88
275 SANDBAGS/STREET DEPT 200.00
512 UTILITIF,S 8.31
TOTAL 38.028.54
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
11/09/93 13:02:22
WARRANT DATE VE1400R
GENERAL CHECKING
35900 11/09/93 FOSTER-FRANZEN-CARLS
35901 11/10/93 A.E. MICHAELS
35902 11/10/93 ARA CORY REFRESHMENT
35003 11/10/93 AUTOMATIC GARAGE 000
35904 11/10/93 BEN FRANKLIN
35905 11/10/93 BRAUN INTERTEC ENVIO
35906 11/10/93 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
35906 11/10/93 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
35907 11/10/03 CENTRAL MCGOWAN. INC
35908 11/10/93 CHOUINAO OFFICE PROD
35909 11/10/93 COAST TO COAST
35909 11/10/93 COAST TO COAST
35009 11/10/93 COAST TO COAST
35909 11/10/93 COAST TO COAST
35900 11/10/93 COAST TO COAST
35909 11/10/93 COAST TO COAST
3SO00 11/10/93 COAST TO COAST
35909 11/10/93 COAST TO COAST
35909 11/10/93 COAST TO COAST
35809 11/10/93 COAST TO COAST
38000 11/10/93 COAST TO COAST
35909 11/10/93 COAST TO COAST
35910 11/10/93 COMMUNICATION AUOITO
33911 11/10/93 COPY OUPLCATING PR00
35912 11/10/93 CULLIGAN
35913 11/10/03 FAIR'S GARDEN CENTER
35914 11/10/93 FOREST CITY ROAD LAN
35915 11/10/93 GOPHER STATE ONE CAL
35916 11/10/93 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
35916 11/10/03 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
35916 11/10/93 HARRY'S AUTO SUPPLY
Disbursement Journ. '}}
_J
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
61 INS PREMIUM/FIRE DEPT 729.17
338 STREET SUPPLIES 3.18
408 CITY HALL SUPPLIES 84.00
260 MTC OF FIRE.HALL DOOR 131.40
20 PW INSPECTION SUPPLIES 8.50
638 CONCRETE CYCL/C NILS 198.00
20 PROF SERV/H WINDOW 2.025.00
26 MISC PROF SERVICES/HR 393.75
2.4 18.75
30 WIRE/SHOP & GARAGE 55.10
413 TYPEWRITER REPAID/LIB 69.17
35 MISC PARK SUPPLIES 7.33 t
35 PW INSPECTION SUPPLIES 18.79
35 SHOP & GAR BLO REPAIRS 8.63
35 CITY HALL SLO REPAIR SU 6.18
35 SHALL TOOLS/SHAOE TRE 106.49
35 REPAIR & MTC/PARKS BLO 28.99
35 MISC SHOP & GAR SUPPLI 30.33
35 MISC WATER SUPPLIES 45.81
35 FIRE DEPT BLD REPAIRS '40.25
35 VEHICLE t4TC/PARKS 3.61
35 STREET SUPPLIES 28.68
36 LIBRARY CLEANING SUP 8.17
335.24
38•FIRE DEPT PAGER REPAIR 54.32
41 LIBRARY COPY MCN MTC 50.40
753 RENTAL WATER SOFTN£k C 22.05
55 TREE PLANTINGS/PABX 3.175.50
563 MISC DUMPING CHARGES 60.50
60 PROF SERVICES/WATER 333.00
78 OIL/SEWER COLL 27.74
79 MISC WATER DEPT SUPPLI 58.02
78 VEH REPAIR PARTS/STREE 27.77
112.43
11/09/93 13:0? :?'2
1/A%$At:T DATt VI'u.);jR
GENERAL CHECXING
35917 11/10/93 HERote s/JERRY
35918 11/10/93 HOGLUND COACH LINES
35919 11/10/93 KEN ANOERSON TRUCKIN
35920 11/10/93 XRAMSER b. ASSOCIATES
35921 11/10/93 LEAGUE OF t4.IraNESOTA
35922 11/10/93 MAUS FOODS
35922 11/10/93 MAUS FOODS
35922 11/10/93 MAUS FOODS
35922 11/10!93 MAUS FOODS
35922 11/10/93 MAUS FOODS
35923 11/10/93 MH SrArE FIRE OEPART
35924 11/10/93 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO
35925 11/10/93 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR
35925 11/10/93 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR
35925 11/10/93 MON'rICELLO OFFICE PR
35926 11/10/93 MONTICELLO PRINTING
35926 11/10/93 MONTICELLO PRINTING
35927 11/10/93 MONTICELLO TIMES
35927 11/10/93 MONTICELLO TIMES
35927 11/10/93 MONTICELLO TIMES
35927 11/10/93 MONTICELLO TIMES
35927 11/10/93 MONTICELLO TIMES
35927 11/10/93 MONTICELLO TIMES
35927 11/10/93 MONTICELLO TIMES
35927 11/10/03 MONTICELLO TIMES
35927 11/10/93 MONTICELLO TIMES
35927 11/10/93 MONTICELLO TIMES
35927 11/10/93 MONTICELLO TIMES
35927 11/10/93 MC-01TICELL0 TIMES
35929 11/10/43 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
3:928 11/10/93 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
35929 11/10/93 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR
35928 11/10/93 NATIONAL BUSHING PAP
Oignur;_m-ant JUurll--1
OE5'P,IPTICxs Ar�OJuT
81 LISRARY CLEANING C0L.1T 227.50
483 HEA.+TLANO EYPOESS C 4.936.38
697 PROF SERVICES/ANIMAL. 170-2
688 ASSESSING CONTRACT 1.792.08
98 REG FEE/RICK W 40.00
108 SHOP MATERIALS/WATEQ 0 24.90
108 MISC CITY HALL SUPPLIE 70.28
108 SHOP R. GARAGE SUPPLIES 8.98
108 CLEANING SUPPLIES/Af4IM 25.02
108 MIST EXPENSE/Hap 32.58
161.76
437 1994 FIRE DEPT CUES • 120.00
195 ANIMAL CONTROL CONT 1.100.00
136 CITY HALL OFFICE SUP 407.30
136 AOOING MACHINE/FINAtJC 169.55
136 ADMIN OFFICE CHAIRS 4.023.53
4.600.38
137 ADDRESS LABELS/CITY HA 50.06
137 BUSINESS CARDS/J ONEIL 49.52
99.58
140 SNOWMOBILE AO 28.80
140 SNOWPLOWING A RINK AD 55.20
140 RECYLING INFORMA71ON 277.20
140 WATER MAIN FLUSHING AO 76.80
140 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 2.115.70
140 PUBLIC HEARINGS 136.24
140 COMMUNITY GUIDE PRO 1,005.00
140 MONTE FORD STORM SEL/ A 54.90
140 BRIAR OAKES STORM SEW 15.25
140 HEARTLAND EMPRESS BUS 235.00
140 SCHOOL BLVD AO 16.30
140 CHLORINATION AD FOR BI 93.94
4.102.23
144 VEH REPAIR PARTS/S'rQE 177.75
144 MISC STREET SUPPLIES 5.50
144 PLO REPArPS/SHOP 8 BAR 7.96
144 MTC OF PARK VEHICLES 6.91
198.02
BPC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
11/09!93 13:02:22
WARRANT DATE 1,'ENOCA
GENERAL CHECXING
35929 1//10/93 NORTHERN STATES POW
35929 1//10!93 NORTHEnN STATES PC -WE
35929 11/10/93 NORTHERN STATES POWE
35929 11/10/93 NORTHERN STATES POWE
35929 11/10/93 NORTHERN STATES POWS
3$)29 11/10/93 NORTHERN STATES PONE
35929 11/10/93 NORTHERN STATES POW -
35929 1i/io/93 NORTHERN STATES P0.4E
35929 11/10/93 NORTHERN STATES POW2
35,329 11/10/93 NORTHERN STATES PO:tE
35930 11/10/93 OLSON & SONS ELECTRI
35930 11/10/93 OLSON R SCANS ELECTRI
35930 11/10/93 OLSON & SONS ELECTzt
Oisours4mAnt Jourr
i
0ESCRI9TION AMOUNT
148
UTILITIES
2.664.92
148
UTILITIES
261.10
148
UTILITIES
4.506.99
148
UTILITIES
97.99
148
UTTLITIES
631.30
148
UTILITIES
14.55
149
UTILITIES
346.01
148
UTILITIES
241.00
148
UTILITIES
613.04
148
UTILITIES
605.17
35931
11/10/93
10.037.16
160
RRAMER RENTAL
REPAIRS 41.00
160
PARK 6LO REPAIRS 96.59
160
SOCXET/NATER
20.02
FEES/CUSTOM CANOPY 75.38
35931
157.60
35031
11/10/93
ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
162
ENG
FEES/PUORRS 5.013.81
35931
11/10/93
ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
162
ENG
FEES/MONT FORD 2.496.66
35931
11/10/93
ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
162
ENG
FEES/HART BLVD 4.293.01
35931
11/10/93
ORP-SCHELEN-MAYERON
162
ENG
FEES/6RIAR DAVE$ 452.25
3$931
11/10/93
ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
162
EP+G
FEES/STANOARO 190 449.44
35931
11/10/93
ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
162
ENG
FEES/H WINDOW COM $43.38
35931
11/10/93
ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
162
ENG
FEES/CUSTOM CANOPY 75.38
35931
11/10/93
ORR- SCHELEN-MAYERON
162
ENG
FEES/teEAOOW OAKS 435.38
35934
11/10/93
UNI TOG
RENTAL
SEP.VIC
13.149.43
35932 11/10/93 PETERSEN'S MONT FORD 165 CORRECT CODING 29.95CR
35932 11/10/93 PETERSEN'S VONT FORD 165 CORRECT COOING+ 29.95
35932 ii/SO/93 PETERSEN'S MONT FORD 165 YEN REPAIR PARTS/STP.EE 34.85
34.95
35933
11/10/93
PREUSSE'S CLEANING S
173
FIRE HALL CLEANING
CON $0.00
35933
11/10/93
PREUSSE'S CLEANING S
173
CITY HALL CLEANING
CO 400.00
450.00
35934
11/10/93
UNI TOG
RENTAL
SERVIC
211
UNIFOQM
RENTAL
14.16
35934
11/10/93
UNITOG
RENTAL
SERVIC
211
UNIFORM
RENTAL
26.32
35934
11/10/93
UNITOG
RENTAL
SERVIC
211
UNIFORM
RENTAL
16.00
35934
11/10/93
UNI TOG
RENTAL
SEP.VIC
211
UNIFOP.N.
RENTAL
16.00
35934
11/10/93
UNI TOG
RENTAL
SERVIC
211
UNIFORM
RENTAL
94.92
35934
11/10/93
Uri ITOG
RENTAL
SERVIC
211
UNIFORM
RENTAL
42.42
201.72
35935 tt/10/93 UNIVERSITY OF MINNES
35936 11/10/93 UNOCAL
212 REG FEE/GARY ANDERSON 120.00
213 GAS/FIRE DEPT 26.45 _)
SRC FI1JAt4Clet SYSTEM
11/09/93 13:02:'2?
WARP.ANT OATS VeNJOR
C,E,NERAL CHECKING
35937 11/10/93 WRICPT COUNTV AUOITO
35937 11/10/03 WRICHT CO'UrtTY AUOITO
35038 11/10/03 Y.M.C.A. OF MINNCAPG
35939 11/10/93 2APNOTH SRUSH WOP.KS.
GENE'UL CHECKIOG
l3
O{YDIYrs4me At J.7,Ir.++
O=SCP.ICTION A
219 SHERI'FF'S CONTP ACT 21.793_.00
219 AOO'L LANOFIIL CHIM 10.525.t+
32.414.7+
224 NOV CO0TQACT PAYMENT 825.00
4SS SP1 /STR£E'T DZEOT 522.38
TOTAL 83.712.39
I
BRv; FINANCIAL SYSTEM
10/29/93
09:55:31
Disbur3ement Uourn.li
C
WARRANT
0.4TE
VENook
OESCP.I?TION
At40UUT
LIQUOR FUND
17190
1'0/28/93
GPO55L5IN
SEVERAGE I
800019
LIQUOR PURCHASE
4.459.35
171:30
10/28/93
GROSSLEIN
8'EVERAGE I
800019
MON ALCOHOLIC SEER
151-00
4.624.33
17191
10/23/93
L "N" R
SERVIC5S
900025
FRONT DOOR REPAIR
150.9$
17 1S?
10/28/93
M0I4TICEL
LO , I:•cS
300032
WINE PURCHASE
52.96
17193
10/28/93
GRIGGS.
COOPER 8, C11 -M
8000'3
1-10001 PU:iCHASc
1.309.11
17193
10123/93
GRIGGS.
COrj;,E2 & COt<
50001E
NISC ITE1,3 FOR RESALE 90.40
17133
10128/93
GRIGSS.
COOPER r. 00111
300018
WIroE CREDIT
77.??C:.
1.912.29
17104
10/'28/03
JOHNSON
d4OS WHOLESA
9000'2?
LIQUOR PURCHASE
5.375.73
17194
10/8/93
JOHNSON
6R0,- wtiOLcSA
5000??
WINE PURCHASE
3.6C7.36
3.983.09
17135
10/28/93
GPICiGS.
COOPER & COM
800018
WINE ,UP.CHASE
1.143.62
17195
10/?8/193
GRtGGB.
COOPEP. A COM
800018
LIQUOR AURCHASE
1.682.35
3.825.97
17166
10/28/93
QUALITY
WINE A SPIRI
800040
LIQUOR PURCHASE
2.808.77
17196
10/28/93
QUALITY
WINE & SPIRI
800040
WINE PURCHASE
281.09
2.890.46
17197
10/28/93
CITY OF
M.ONTICELLO
800003
TO GENERAL CHEC91
100.000.00
17188
10/28/03
JOHNSON
8403 WHOLESA
900022
BEER PURCHASE
39.90
17198
10/28/93
JOHNSON
BROS WHOLESA
800022
WINE PURCHASE
646.97
11198
10/?8/03
JOHNSON
BROS WHOLESA
80002?
LIQUOR CREDIT
18.330
069.54
17189
10/28/93
PHILLIPS
8 SONS CO/E
800037
WINE PURCHASE
432.56
17199
19/28/93
PHILLIPS & SOt+S CO/E
800037
f4ISC ITEMS FOP. RESALE 20.00
17,199
10/28/03
PHILLIPS
b SONS CQ/E
800037
LIQUOR PURCHASE
3.976.93
4.129.49
LIQUOR FUND
TOTAL
127.237'.98
i ZNANC. IAl- SV-T
11/01003 09:39:17 O"3DUr3?rt18rt Jo:1rn--1
4AP9AN- QATE VeAlG? OF_ SCRIPTIO-4 AM.)UtjT�
LIQUOR FUND
17200 11/04/93 SERNIC':'S PEPSI COLA 800001 POP PURCHASE 334.20
17?01 11/04/93 CITY OP MONTICELLO 900903 SEWER & WATE:7 6I,.L 2?2.S,1
10202 11/04/93 COAST TO COAST 800004 LI.3HT3. ETC.MISC MTC S 12.11
11202 11/04/03 COAST TO COAST 800904 CLEANING SUPPLIES 21.81
33.92
11203 11/04/93 GAY OISTRISUTING CON 900010 eZ ER PURCHASE 4dB.65
172*3 11/O4/93 GAY OISTR:9UTIN6 COM 800010 NON ALCOHOLIC SE:R 31.30
$17.05
•7•:Oa 1i/oa/93 OIC1' 1:1;-51 SALE CO.. 88QO11 BEER PURCHASE 1.374.30
'17204 11/04/93 0I011 WHOLESALE CO.. 900011 NON ALCOHOLIC 3EE40.00
1720- 11104/S3 OIC,: W1 OteSALE CO.. 800011 LIMP ST-)P,E SU0P1.IE5 31.95
1 .1&43.75
17295 1.104/43 FLeiCY'S ?a:EP SERVI 809110 STORE S'JZPLiES 120.77
11205 11/04/03 FLESCH'S PAGER SE?VI S11)•16 PAPER BAGS 73.164
149.21
17?06 11/04/03 G & N SERVICE 900129 RUG +ATSImT1: OF SLO 31.?
17207 11/04/93 GRIGG$. C002ER & COM 600018 LIOUOP PURCHASE 4.036.76
17209 11/04/93 GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE 1800010 BEER PURCHASE 6.017.60
17208 11/04/93 GROSSLEI14 BEVERAGE I 800019 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIE 26.76
1.004.38
17209 11/04/93 HOME JUICE 800130 JUICE FOR RESALE 47.85
17210 11/04/93 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 900022 WINE PURCHASE 572.22
17211 11/04/93 JUDE CANDY & TOBACCO 909021 GIGS. CIGARS. ETC 293.06
11211 11/04/93 JUDE CANDY & TOBACCO 900021 LIAUOR STORE SUPPLIES 129.60
423.28
17412 11/04/03 MN BAR SUPPLY 800130 COOLEPS FOR RESaLE 37.84
17213 11/04/93 MOuT ICELLO O:FICE PR 800031 MISC SUPPLIES 120.x0
17213 11/04/93 NONTICELLO OFFICE PR 800031 OFFICE S'JP?:[ES 18.04
145.34
170116 11/04/03 NGNtItE o OQINi[NC 9Qv57 NI54 Pi[NTG•., :Gime ?9.57
,'21/ti3 N0:" :?.a jr%TBS 00*.c 8030:.) UTILITIES
17216 1+/04/33 OL'30P 0 SONS dLeCf�,l aoi036';TMA::9P
RRC FIttANCIAL SYSTEM
11/01,193 001: 30:17 0' sbursecle4m. 4ourne i
�.J WAC:RANT DeE VE4002 OESCPI:PTION AMOUNT
LIQUOR FUND
17217 11/04/93 POW S ICc COMOANY 800041 ICE FOP RESALE •71.10
17?18 11/04/93 ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT 900045 MISC I•TEtnS FOR fiESALE 50.08
17213 •.104/93 ST. CLOD? PESTAUP.ANT 800046 CLcANTNG SUPPLIES 43.19
17215 11./04/03 ST. C%jDUO RESTAURANT 800045 LIQUOR STORE SUPPLIES 32.50
�T. Clfi1:0 PE.STA-UP.AN1 500045 JUICE FOP RESALE 30.35
155..3?
.7219 11t04/83 T40P.PE JDVi''9.'13UTING 800048 BEER F.Oa RESALE 5.552.95
1i119 11/04/93 rmOPoE DISNIEUTING 800048 NON ALCOhOLIC ZEE -2 2125.00
10.017.95
17220 11/04/93 TOTAL REGISTER S•YSTE 800112 CASH REGISTER MTC A 1.500.00
17221 11/04/93 VIAING COCA-COLA SOT 800051 POP PUP.CI+ASE 082.95
17222 11/04/93 ?EE MEOICAL SERVICE 800054 1116C LIQUOR SUPPLIES 1.3.17
LIQUOR FVNO TOTAL 26.083:75
SRC F 10ANC LAL S'YS
T St'
11/05/93
13:13:30
pi ,�ur•3?mint Jqur n.+
WARRANT
041E
VE
F: I PT I61:
AMOL—N i
L [ri-JOq F UNC•
17223
11/04/93
TRAVc,jF.4
£004r?
A�jvEPTIStr:.;
137.0.::
172?4
11/05/)3
AUDIG ,:J:•1'1!1+[CAf[0N5
800156
EOUIPMENT '+EPAI.:S
25.57
172:'5
1!/05/97
gain:•:wkr9p 79I.S ::21.1
og00C_
T +_: :•r:E C:A...�,
122.r�?
172?S
11/03/93
COre
300064
CHFC'AS P"ENTEC-
114.08
172?7
11/05/93
OAHLSE'."ER OISTRISUT
300005
BEEP P1J5•)H.ASE
15.11E.00
17227
11/13S/33
OAHLHFIME9 DISTPI6UT
800009
NON A1_C•}H,1_t': 2•= '?
496.10
15.614.10 '
17229
11/05/93
DAV-----R HAMCf:
800035
RT88C'NS/GEro OPE;AT
SUP 1. 0?
17229
11/05/93
GPIG0:. C0'JPEF & 1 -C. -A0
800018
LIQUOR PUR- MASE
11.220.4 1
1722'3
11/05/93
rRE..;.3s. COOPED & COM
900018
+ZINE P1J:,)Iir.S;
235.27
5.511.61
1 713
11/05i93
J01,t:SON BIOS WHOLESA
8000?2
L[ IJO'+ PU:�e::IASE
4.055.++'1 t
17?3'!
11/05/93
JC''',r:r; r: BROS W1.0LESA
eeo022
MINE FURCF::.' E
2.240.10
17230
11/05/93
JOHNSON SCOS WHOLESA
900022
AOv« TI3Ir+:
372.5
6.674.3
1 123 1
11/05/93
LIEFExr t.:UCKIrt1;
800025
FRE[':.+T Cl%,.* -GE:
599.31
17232
11/05/93
rt It:ta_-;,ASC0
e00160
UTILITIES
16.55
17233
11/05/93
!1N CEPARTNENT OF REV
900006
SALTS TA, FOR CCfO
10.677.O9
17234
11/05/93
CjFFI,.E PR
80,)03!
CC,OING AO,-
0.38CR
,7234
11/05/93
M•:ttTICEL,.O OFFICE Pa
900031
OFFICE SUPPLIES
8.2:
7 S
17.23)
11/05/93
t+EW PPOOUI:TS SALES &
800152
MUGS FOR cEiALE
155.41
17236
11/05/93
PAVSTIS & 5ONS
900103
M114C PURCHA E
52.00
17?37
11/05/93
PHILLIPS & SONS CO/E
800037
LIOIJOR PURCHASE
3.959.39
17237
11/05/93
PHILLIPS & 50NS CO/E
600037
r4I5C 1T°t<S FOR RESALE 39.56
17237
11/05/93
PHILLIPS & SOUS COVE
800037
WINE PUPCHASE
253.67
4.252.62
17238
11/05/93
QUALITv WINE & SPIRI
800040
--NUOR PUrCHASE
3.316.13
17238
11/05/93
OUALI'fv WINE & SPIRI
800040
MINE PURCHASE
656.90
17:39
11/05/133
OUAI.Tr'v WINE A SPIRI
80001+0
MISL. %11'AES FOR RiSALE 18.42
3.901.4.
17239
11/05/93
SHA.:L' GJRPOrtATIOH
d1101S1
•3UPP1.1,5
41.51"p