Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 02-28-1994AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL Monday, March 28, 1994 - 7 p.m. Mayor: Ken Maus Council Members: Shirley Anderson, Brad Fyle, Clint Herbst, Patty Olsen 1. Call to order. 2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held March 14, 1994. 3. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints. 4. Consideration of approval of the preliminary plat of the Eastwood Knoll residential subdivision. Applicant, City of Monticello. 5. Consideration of rezoning Outlots C and D of the Meadow Oak subdivision from R -PUD to R-1. Applicant, City of Monticello. 6. Consideration of a resolution ordering preparation of plans and specifications - Eastwood Knoll subdivision. Applicant, City of Monticello. 7. Receive update on status of RFP process - Outlot A, Country Club Manor. K Consideration of approving and authorizing advertisement of community arena design study RFP. 9. Consideration of adopting a resolution approving the feasibility study for phase IV of the Cardinal Hills residential subdivision. 10. Consideration of replacing riding lawn mower and snowblower for city hull. 11. Consideration of bids and quotes for replacement of 1978 International plow truck. 12. Consideration of granting burning permit allowing maintenance of the prairie grass planting at the 'I'upper's Inc. industrial site. 1:1. Consideration of allowing fire department to conduct controlled prairie grass burn - pathway project. 14. Consideration to ratify Clic EI)A's approval to amend the Non -Performance Provision fin• CMEF Loan No. 007, 15. Consideration of bills for the month of Murch. lli. Adjournment. AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL Monday, February 28, 1884 - 7 p.m. Mayor: Ken Maus Council Members: Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brad Fyle, Patty Olsen 1. Call to order. 2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held February 14, 1994. 3. Citizens comments/petiLions, requests, and complaints. 4. Consideration of an amendment to the zoning map which would change the zoning district designation of a portion of Lot 4, Block 1, Lauring Hillside Terrace Addition, from R-3 (multi -family residential) to PZM (performance zone mixed). Applicant, Vaughn Veit. fi. Consideration of an amendment to a conditional use permit which would allow expansion of an existing restaurant in a PZM (performance zone mixed) zone. Applicant, Hillside Partnership. 6. Consideration of granting preliminary approval for issuing an on -sale liquor license for it restaurant in the Sixth Street Annex mall. 7. Continuation of consideration of amendment to contract with 1) & K for curbside recycling services. 8. Consideration of reviewing year-end liquor store financial statements. 9. Consideration of reviewing sketch plans and authorizing preparation of preliminary plat--Outlots C and 1), Meadow Oak Estiatcs. 10. Consideration of appointing Council tmWmhrr to planning rommit.tee for alley reconstruction project. IL Consideration of a resolution authorizing feasibility study and preparation of plans for Cardinal Hills, phase IV. 12. Consideration of treating wastewater trucked in from the Creek Ridge development in tit. Michael. 1:1. Consideration of updating the utility billing system. Council Agenda February 28, 1994 Page 2 14. Consideration of purchasing Planfile system for map storage. 15. Consideration of a special meeting or workshop for wastewater treatment plant expansion planning. 16. Consideration of 7th annual Junk Amnesty Day on May 7, 1994. 17. Consideration of demolishing the Cole house near city hall. 18. Consideration of replacement of 1978 International heavy duty snowplow truck. 19. Consideration to adopt a resolution calling for a public hearing for the modification of the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1, modification of the TIF Plans for TIF District Nos. 1-1 to 1-15, and the adoption of the TIF Plan for TIF District No. 1-16. 20. Consideration of approving application for gambling license renewal -- Monticello Jaycees. 21. Consideration of bills for the month of February. 22. Adjournment. MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, February 14, 1994 - 7 p.m. Members Present: Shirley Anderson, Brad Fyle, Clint Herbst, Ken Maus, Patty Olsen Members Absent: None 2. Consideration of approval of minutes of the regular meeting held January 24. 1994. After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded by Shirley Anderson to approve the meeting minutes as submitted. Voting in favor: Shirley Anderson, Brad Fyle, Clint Herbst, Ken Maus. Abstaining: Patty Olsen. 3. Citizens comments/vetitions, requests, and complaints. None forthcoming. Consideration of a senior citizen center report. Pam Loidolt, Senior Citizen Center Director, was present to provide an update to Council on senior citizen center activity. Loidolt noted that use of the facility and various programs has been on the increase in 1993. New at the center is availability of a treadmill and exercise bike. There are also plans to open up the senior center on Saturdays. She stated that at this time, there is no need to expand the facility; however, it might make sense to consider expanding the restroom facilities. Council thanked Loidolt for the report and directed the Building Inspector to work with the Senior Center Director toward development of a plan for addressing the need t<) expand the restroom facilities. Consideration of -it mend men tto contract with D & K for curbside recvcling services. In his staff report, John Simula reported that D & K's recycling costs have increased dramatically due to an increase in the cost to dispose of newspaper. Simola reported that D & K representatives say that they cannot. ahsorh this significant cost increase, and they have requested that the City consider paying the additional cost under Section V, Disputes Force Majeure, of the contract. Simola went on to note that this additional cost to dispose of newspaper is believed to be a temporary situation and hopefully by summer will be resolved. Page 1 Council Minutes - 2/14/94 Brad Fyle asked if the recycler is ahead in any other categories such as expected revenue that may be over and above what he expected to obtain through recycling of aluminum cans. After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded by Clint Herbst to table the matter pending development of additional information regarding the operation of the curbside recycling service as operated by D & K Refuse and Recycling. Motion carried unanimously. 6. Consideration of purchase of V2 ton, 4 -wheel drive pickup for street department. John Simola reported at the last Council meeting staff discussed the need for an additional pickup in the street and park department. Council tabled action on the matter pending completion of an inventory of vehicles and drivers. In his staff report, Simola provided a complete listing of the vehicles utilized by the public works department along with the primary and secondary drivers for each vehicle. City Council discussed the merits of purchasing an additional pickup truck. Brad Fyle indicated that he was not necessarily in favor of an additional pickup truck but would support buying a larger 1 -ton truck with a plow and wing because of the added versatility that such a truck would provide. Roger Mack reiterated that the need for the pickup truck stems from the need to make better use of our personnel. Currently, employees, especially summer employees, need to utilize very heavy, expensive equipment for shuttling from project site to project site. Furthermore, summer employees cannot drive heavy trucks because they do not have class B licenses, which requires that full-time employees with Class B licenses must chauffeur summer help. In summary, buying an additional pickup would allow better use of personnel and equipment. After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by Shirley Anderson to purchase a V2 ton, 4 -wheel drive pickup for the street dupai anent. Voting in favor: Ken Maus, Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Patty Olsen. Opposed: Brad Fyle. Consideration of authorizing preparation of sketch plans for development of property owned by the City in the Meadow Oak development. Rick Wolfsteller reported that the City recently obtained title to Outlets C and D of Meadow Oak Estates through a mortgage foreclosure process. The foreclosure process resulted from failure of Dickman Knutson to pay improvement costs associated with the extension of utilities to the area. Now that the City has control of the property, Council needs to determine if Page 2 I l Council Minutes - 2/14/94 it wants to sell the property outright for development by a private developer, or does the Council want to plat the property, install improvements, and sell the lots. Under the first alternative, the City will not be able to recover its total costs relating to the original foreclosure. Under the second alternative, the City would be able to break even and would also have the ability to control the type of development on site. It could be an opportunity for the City to preserve land area for higher -valued homes. Patty Olsen was concerned that the City did not have the expertise or staff available to market the property once it is developed. Ken Maus responded that perhaps the property could be marketed through a realtor that the City could contract with. Clint Herbst liked the concept of creating a development for more expensive homes. Jay Johnson discussed his interest in trading a portion of industrial property now owned by his development company. He noted that he currently controls land that could be earmarked for industrial uses at the site formerly known as the Evergreens development. Perhaps Council would like to trade properties, which would give the City land that could be used in conjunction with economic development efforts. After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded by Shirley Anderson to authorize City staff to prepare sketch plans outlining residential development of Outlots C and D. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of aanrovine Outlot A. Country Club Manor. reauest for nroaosals format, authorize distribution to develooers. Assistant Administrator O'Neill provided Council with a draft of a proposed request for proposals format and outlined major provisions within the proposal. Steve Walters, area resident and neighborhood representative, noted that he reviewed the request for proposals and is satisfied with the format. He thanked the City Council for requiring that a portion of the property be dedicated for park uses in addition to the 3.1 acres needed for storm water detention. After discussion, a motion was made by Brad Fyle and seconded by Patty Olsen to approve the request for proposals format and authorize distribution to developers. Motion carried unanimously. Page 3 l '� Council Minutes - 2/14/94 Consideration to review for acceptance the Economic Develonment Authoritv's (EDA) vear-end statement and 1994 budeet. After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by Shirley Anderson to accept the EDA balance sheet, statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balance, 1994 cash flow projections, and the annual activity report as presented. Motion carried unanimously. 10. Consideration to review the UDAG and SCERG vear-end financial reports and consideration to approve the EDA 1994 appropriations request. After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by Patty Olsen to commit the projected remaining UDAG payment of $165,497 to the GMEF and approve the 1994 liquor fund appropriation of $100,000 for the GMEF. It is understood that under the $100,000 appropriation for the GMEF, the money is appropriated for use during 1994, and if the funds are not expended during that time, said funds are not automatically rolled over into the next year's appropriation. In other words, liquor fund appropriations made on an annual basis are not cumulative. Motion carried unanimously. 11. Consideration of erantina a seasonal 3.2 beer license to the Monticello Softball Association. After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Brad Fyle to grant the license contingent upon receipt of necessary insurance documents and appropriate fees, and direct City staff to work with the Parks Commission toward review of the fee structure for tournament use of the NSP softball fields. Motion carried unanimously. 12. Consideration of annointine two Council members to a Communitv Area Plannine and Manaeement Committee. Assistant Administrator O'Neill noted that a committee made up of City, Township, School District, and Arena Association representatives is being formed to study the community arena facility issues. The purpose of the group is to establish preliminary plans for the facility itself and site improvements with the goal of inventorying project costs and funding sources. The group would also prepare a community arena operations budget outlining revenue sources and expenses. The group will also discuss zoning issues and management of the facility once it is constructed. The ad hoc committee will he responsible for making recommendations to the jurisdictions involved with the project. Page 4 `� J Council Minutes - 2J14/94 O'Neill went on to ask for volunteers from the Council to serve on the committee. After discussion, Patty Olsen and Clint Herbst volunteered to serve on the committee. There being no further discussion, the meeting was adjourned. Jeff ONeill Assistant Administrator Page 5 0 Council Agenda - 2/28/94 4. Consideration of an amendment to the zoning map which would change the zoning district designation of a portion of Lot 4. Block is Lauring Hillside 'Terrace Addition. from R-3 (multi -family residential) to PZM (performance zone mixed). Applicant. Vaughn Veit. (J.O.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: In conjunction with the proposed establishment of a restaurant at the Hillside mall (otherwise known as Sixth Street Annex), Vaughn Veit. requests that the City allow rezoning of a portion of Lot 4, Block 1, from its present zoning designation, which is R-3, to PZM. The rezoning is needed to accommodate additional parking needed for a proposed restaurant replacing PJ's Pizza. As you recall, some months ago the City Council approved an amendment to the original conditional use permit which allowed establishment of P.1's Pizza. As one of the conditions of operation, the developer was required to guarantee that an additional 18 parking spaces would be developed in the event that the parking demand created by PJ's Pizza warranted additional parking. As it turned out, the parking demand never reached a critical point; therefore, the additional parking was not required. The present request differs from 1'J's Pizza in that the entire restaurant space will be used for seating and kitchen facilities, whereas the PJ's Pizza proposal used much of the space for araide machines. Additional parking needed under the new proposal amounts to 66 parking spaces versus 18 parking spaces under the PJ's Pizza proposal. It, is obvious that the existing site cannot accommodate 56 additional parking spaces; therefore, the parking area must he expanded onto adjacent property ( Lot 4, Block 1). In order for parking to occur on Lot 4, Block 1, it must he rezoned to match the Hillside mall zoning designation. At their special meeting on Tuesday, February 22, the Planning Commission reviewed the case and recommended that the rezoning he allowed to occur but limited the rezone area to the. perimeter of Che additional parking needed in conjunction with expansion of the restaurant use. In addition, it was required that the lot lines be adjusted so that the parking lot area would be combined with the Hillside mall property an(; taken away from LOO, 4, Block I. The developer was present at the Planning Commission meeting and was satisfied with the Planning Commission's recommendation. Please review the Planner's report for additional insights into this matter Council Agenda - 2/28/94 B. Al: FRNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Motion to approve rezoning request contingent on realignment of lot lines, which would result in the additional parking area being added to the Hillside mall site. This alternative could be selected based on the finding that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the character and geography of the area and that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the comprehensive plan. If Council selects this alternative, then it can consider intensification of the Hillside mall site through development of the restaurant. facility as proposed. Please note that the City has received no fornial objections from the neighborhood regarding the rezoning proposal. 2. Motion to deny request for rezoning as proposed. City Council could select this alternative based on a finding that the proposed rezoning is not consistent with the nature and geography of the arca. Perhaps City Council does not like the idea of the parking area encroaching into the rear area of the lots originally intended for multi -family development. Perhaps there are conflicts between the parking area and the mall site that could arise. After reviewing the excerpts from the comprehensive plan, perhaps Council feels the proposal is not consistent with the plan because of Ole encroachment into the multi -family residential area. C. STAFF ItECOMMENDATION City stuff concurs with the Planner's analysis, which basically supports the concept of allowing the project to expand its proposed. The rezoning request would not appear to significantly impact the adjoining properties. The conditional use process is in place, which requires landscaping find screening of parking areas and thus gives the Cit;v sonic measure of control in initigat.ing conflicts. As you will note under the conditional use permit its recommended by the Planning Commission, there are conditions listed that, are designed to assure harmony of land use between the nulti-fumily to the south and the intensified mall use. 1). SUPPORTING DATA: I?xcerpt, from comprehensive plan: Planner's report,: Area map. Pr - =. . & m %. COMMERCIAL POLICIES 1. Commercial development in general and successful retailing functions should occur both in the central business district end the shopping center area contiguous to Interstate 94. 2. The Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance, and other measures and procedures will be modified in realistic recognition of the needs of contemporary commercial enterprises and the need to properly control such enterprises at the local community level; commercial development policy will not be rigid and inflexible, and neither shall it be indiscriminately permissive. 3. Adequate provision should be made for expansion of suitable areas for highway oriented commercial development requiring large acreages for use such as motels, auto and implement dealerships, and lumber and building supply yards. These uses should be encouraged to develop in new locations along Interstate 94 at Highway 25. 4. The location of new shopping areas should be justified by an ' adequate market study (market radius, customer potential, suitable location in the market radius, etc.) and consideration for the neighborhood, land use, and circulation pattern. 5. Commercial areas should be as compact as possible. Compact commercial areas are particularly advantageous for retail uses, . as they concentrate shopping and parking. A community is n beefited by reducing exposure to residential areas and having a better control over parking and traffic needs. Par this reason, 'atcip' and "spot" commercial development should not be . permitted. 6. Highway oriented uses along Interstate 94 should be concentrated ■ to the greatest extent possible so as not to waste prime commercial land nor spread the uses so as to not be definable as a "viable commercial area'. 7. Future commercial areas should be based upon the concept of the Integrated business center developed according to a specific site plan and justified by an economic analysis of the area to be served. B. All major commercial areas shall be pro -zoned based upon the ComyiuNorcive Plan. No areas shall be re -zoned to commercial one unless they are shown to be properly lo -:bled in ocamrdance with the policies and standards of the Comprehensive Plan. 9. Boundaries of commercial districts shall be well-defined so as to prevent intrusion into residential sreasi residential areas must be properly screened from the associated ill effects of adjacent and nearby commercial area. -48- FED -2 2-94 TUE T- 1 `s 0 P - 02 FN Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. Cj URBAN PL ANNI HU • D E S I a N• MAR K E T RESEARCH' MEMORANDUM TO: Jeff O'Neill FROM: Stephen Grittman DATE: 22 February 1994 RE: Monticello - Hillside Partnership Sixth Street Annex Parking Expansion FILE NO: 191.07 - 94.05 This report outlines the procedural steps necessary for the expansion of the parking facilities for the Sixth Street Annex Shopping Center. The proposed parking would be located on a parcel adjacent to the current shopping center, however it is currently a separate lot of record. The most desirable processing is to permit a subdivision of the new parcel and recombine the parking expansion area to the existing parcel containing the shopping center. Once this is accomplished, Lhe zoning of the newly split lot would need to be addressed, since the parking expansion area would still be zoned R-3, Multiple Family Residential. There are two options for thn City to 1+,wAue. The entire parcel, prior to subdiv'_aicn, could be zoned PZM to accolmnodatu the shopping center's parking, or the PZM zone could be extended only as far as the newly created lot line. In the latter case, the remaining land not being utilised for parking would stay R-3, consistent with the land uses on the surrounding lots. If the PZM tune were extended to encompass the entire subject property, future land uses would be controlled by the Comprehensive Plan. To the extent that the primary surrounding land use is multiple family residential, the City would have adequate controls in place to restrict any expansion of commercial usos. F E B- 2 2- 4 4 T U E -, : 1 6 0 P. 03 It would not appear that either proposal would have distinct advantages over the other. Whereas the PZM designation would infer other potential land uses beyond multiple family, any such use would be subject to public hearing and extensive review. This review would also occur if the R-3 designation were retained, but a landowner proposed a zoning change to allow a different use. This review would not occur, however, if the landowner proposed to construct a multiple family project under the R•3 zoning's permitted uses. Regardless of the zoning on the residual parcel, this proposal would appear to be positive in that parking supply has been an issue in previous reviews of the Sixth Street Annex. it could be expected that without additional facilities, parking will continue to cause problems for occupants of the center. 6 3- 4 66 soL fo se j 332 A* dw VL IQ lk 4 2 Council Agenda - 2/28/94 Consideration of an amendment to a conditional use permit which would allow expansion of an existing restaurant in a PZM (performance zone mixed) zone. Applicant, Hillside Partnership. W.O. ) A. RFF'ERENCE AND BACKGROUND As noted in the previous agenda item, Hillside Partnership requests an amendment to their conditional use permit which would allow intensification of the use of the Hillside mall through development of a restaurant replacing PJ's Pizza. The new restaurant proposal results in the need for an additional 56 parking stalls. It is proposed that the parking spaces be located in the rear of the structure as proposed under the attached site plan. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal and recommended approval of the conditional use permit with a number of conditions as noted below under alternative #I. 13. ALTERNATIVE: ACTIONS Motion to approve conditional use permit which would allow intensification of the restaurant use at the Hillside mall subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall provide a parking, grading, and drainage plan supporting development of an vAditional 56 stalls. Prior to the City granting an occupancy permit to the new restaurant, the developer shall obtain written approval of the parking, grading, and drainage plans from the City Engineer. 2. The developer shall not be required to install the parking area prior to occupancy of the restaurant; however, a financial guarantee and associated agreement shall be established that would allow the parking lot to be installed at the discretion of the City and at the full cost of the developer. 11. The portion of Lot 4, (flock 1, needed for parking shall he split away from Lot 4, Block 1, and added to the Hillside mall property. 4. Prior to the City granting occupancy of the restaurant, the developer shall provide a landscaping and screening plan that meets the requirements of the City as approved by City staff. Council Agenda - 2/28/94 5. To improve security, windows shall be installed in the rear of the structure facing the expanded parking area to improve visability of the parking area. 6. All other conditions as noted by ordinance. The motion to approve the conditional use permit is based on the finding that the expansion completed with the required conditions will result in a use that is compatible with the area and will not result in the depreciation of adjoining land values. Although on paper the site falls far short of the parking requirements (56 stalls), the Planning Commission felt that it was prudent to not require that all of the parking be installed prior U) opening of the restaurant. It was felt that the 40 open stalls in the rear that currently exist might be sufficient and it was worth the risk to allow the project to proceed as is on a test basis. At the meeting on the 22nd, the developer noted that he has no problems with meeting any of the conditions identified by the Planning Commission. Planning Commission was somewhat concerned about security and crime problems in the rear of the structure. As you know, the rear of the building is isolated from a public right-of-way and protected from view, thereby creating some questions about security. The following steps have been taken or will be taken to improve security in the area. 1. Tree cover on Lot 1, Block 4, was removed. 2. Additional lighting has been installed. 3. Under the conditional use permit, windows will he open to the rear, which will give restaurant management and patrons a view of the area. 4. Additional traffic in the rear of the building may result in additional security. 2. Motion to deny conditional use permit as requested. Council Agenda - 2/18/94 This alternative should be selected if the developer is unwilling to meet the conditions as required by Council. Vaughn Veit has indicated that he supports the conditions as noted under alternative #I. Perhaps Council will find additional alternatives that Veit may not be willing to support. If so, this alternative should be selected. If Council selects this alternative, it should make a clear finding of fact as to why the conditional use permit as designed has been denied. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff supports the recommendation of the Planning Commission, which is to select alternative #L We are somewhat concerned that the "proof of parking" area or a portion of it will need to he constructed immediately and that perhaps parking problems will he evident soon after the facility opens. On the other hand, it does appear to make sense to hold off on development of the parking until it is clearly known that the parking is truly needed. If the developer is willing to tie up the land for parking and provide the City with an agreement and bond necessary to install the parking at a later date at the City's discretion, it appears reasonable to withhold the requirement that the parking be installed immediately and just see what happens. In conjunction with expansion of the parking area, the landscaping and screening on the perimeter of the site will need to he extended and blended with the existing site. As it final note, the developer has complied with all previous conditional use permit requirements. 1). SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of site plan showing proposed parking expansion area snot delivered as of 2/25 I. Council Agenda - 2/2W94 Consideration of rrrantine oreliminary aauroval for issuinH an on - sale liquor license for a restaurant in the Sixth Street Annex mall_. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Assuming that the City Council has previously approved an amendment to the zoning map for property owned by Vaughn Veit and has also granted a conditional use permit to allow for the expansion of the restaurant within the Sixth Street Annex, the Council is now asked to consider granting a preliminary approval for the on -sale liquor license for that restaurant. Mr. John Purmort of Elk River will be the owner of the restaurant proposed within the Sixth Street Annex and as part of the operation is requesting an on -sale liquor license. The sit-down restaurant proposed will have a sandwich menu and home -baked pizza with a local sports motif. Mr. Punnort currently operates the Sunshine Depot restaurant in Elk River that currently has an on -sale license. That operation has been in existence for approximately 15 years; and during my background check, there appear to he no problems through the criminal aspect that would prohibit Mr. Punnort from having an on -sale license. According to our current ordinances regarding issuing an on -sale liquor license, the City Council must hold a public hearing before granting official approval of it new license, and the public hearing must be held after 10 days published notice of the meeting. Through an oversight on the staffs part because the property in question needed to address rezoning and parking lot expansion issues before considering the liquor license request, the public hearing requirement was not met in time for the Council to officially hold a public hearing Monday night. At this time, the official Council consideration of granting an on -sale liquor license to this establishment will he at the March 14 Council meeting. As I noted earlier, I did have the Wright County Sheriffs office conduct a hackgroond investigation on Mr. Purnwrt and his operation he currently has an on -sale license for in Elk River. All reports have been favorable in regard (o his operation, and there is nothing in the background check that would lead us to consider denial of the request at this time. While the public hearing will allow any interested citizen an opportunity to speak in favor of or in oPposition to this license request, I do not know of any reason where the Council will receive any input that would lead us to alter our recommendation in support of the liquor license assuming the restaurant was previously approved. In order for Mr. Purmort to expedite his remodeling process to allow him to open in early April, I think he would feel comfortable if the Council could grant a preliminary decision on his request for an on -sale license prior to the official public hearing March 14. The Council could make a motion granting preliminary approval contingent upon holding the public hearing. Council Agenda - 2/28/94 The City of Monticello currently has four on -sale licenses in existence and has the ability to issue two more based on our population. Even with the issuance of this license requested, the City would still have one additional license available. Our city ordinances also indicate that any on -sale liquor license applicant shall have invested in fixtures and structure of the proposed on -sale establishment, exclusive of land, an amount of at least $200,000. 1'iu nut sure how the COUI) it may weuA to view this requirement in that Mr. Purmort is only leasing the space for the restaurant and bar, and the Council would have to be comfortable with the establishment having an investment in fixtures and equipment that amounted to the $200,000 requirement. Even if an individual is leasing a facility, we may he able to use the value of the structure being leased in determining if the minimum investment is met. R. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1 ' a Council could grant preliminary approval to the issuance of an on - sale license to Mr. Purmort contingent upon the successful completion P of the public hearing requirement and assuming the Council was comfortable with the fixtures, equipment, and structure having a value of $200,000. 2. If the Council is not comfortable with this establishment meeting the minimum investment or felt that the location is not generally suitable for an on -rule license, the Council may want to table any action until the official public hearing March 14. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Again, assuming the rezoning issue and restaurant parking lot expansion questions have been satisfactorily resolved, the staff cannot see tiny reason why the City Council would want to deny the on -sale liquor license request at this time. While it is possible chat the Council may become aware of additional information its part of the public hearing process, I do not anticipate nny adverse comments that would alter Mr. Purmort's general character or business background that would cause us to reject the license application. Since I believe Mr. Purmort in anxious to get started nn his remodeling project if the previous items were approved, I think it would be appropriate for the Council to give a preliminary indication as to whether the license will be considered favorably at the next meeting. 1). SUPPORTING DATA Copy of application. CITY OF MONTICELLO LICE14SE APPLICATION This application is being submitted for the following license(s)I Set-up license Off -sale, non -intoxicating liquor _V'On-sale, intoxicating liquor on -sale, wine $w On -sale, non -intoxicating liquor on -sale, vine/3.2 beer ��' 14�AP D°6 II•,s-yB Applicant Name:T,#,f AR /u2, .,Lr Age: '1 Date: '/w/9l/' Applicant Address:f?7-39- /9/' AvE d%t✓ Phone: C&I2)VVI- /3.71Cw) d1Lit- 9i33�"� C I AC e, v't c. /I1 St33o Name of Business: Address of Business. 5 30 - L S T la t u t u /210,..71 47 'L., SS 3 fo Z Business Phone: M A. '7 Describe nature of business operation: '57 S,.Y1...,�N /J1F;,��. � �vn,l i�a/!it Pzz,a• - GQ<,;,.. r'3w , wwc If Corporation: Officers, Diractors, Do you or does your corporation, partnership, otc., currently hold any license allowing the calo of wine, intoxicating liquor, non -intoxicating liquor, or act -ups? yea no If yea, llama of Buoinoaa, �)Un1SA a` vF406 Addreaa of Buainoaa, 70/ /%:'�iA) �7' 3-7/ Typo of License 1 On% S'+/f �'4' • (o•'&( "Re.W yeara hold, n& References: Name Addres/s� Telephone Number STI JE OS -b F/ K, ui/L /Tj� `!`�`l�� -1 7v s' ZZsy Credit References (list at least one bank you do business with), Name Address Telephone Number f.*%ff levS. 17,,1• Amount of investment, excluding land: _SVT' (only applicants for on -sale, intoxicating liquor must provide this information) Have you ever been convicted of a felony, or of violating the National Prohibition Act or any State law or ordinance relating to manufacture or transportation of intoxicating liquors= I declare that the above information is true and correct, to the beat of my knowledge. App i ignaturs • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • For City Use Only Surety Bond Liquor Liability Certificato of Insurance Application Fes License Fee Sheriff, Wright County Da to Mayor, City Of Monticallo City Administrator ...sem' z �il aArrs / iS%Nb,eA i7 7z+ 171f 77'rE/rp ,t/c.✓ 0' .2..TC SKS c/✓, n �E'fsf, �� £j� wf'�s+-/ .tt.✓. �i'rt a'3.e�..,u. .S ryf+./�. Vab' -4 7'1/-s t7Ffc.. a L.cc'+rlo. he ✓4rr 1 �. 71 1'//g Fe.? sr nS 71, cliascf /,rt •Jb .a»=d S:r � 7. )v- 4— �iJt+J Y ur.ma4;r 701 Main Street • Elk River, Minnesota 56,30 4 (612) 441.1371 Council Agenda - 2/28/94 7. Continuation of consideration of amendment to contract with D & K for curbside recyclinu services. (J.S.) A. REFERENCE. AND BACKGROUND: At the last meeting, the City Council discussed the possibility of increasing the contract to 1) & K Recycling by $17 per ton for newspaper, or approximately $340 a month. Randy Limn from D & K indicated that it is difficult for his firm to absorb such a significant cost increase even on a short-term basis. The cost, increase had incurred, as his firm had previously been paid $7 per ton for newspaper, and now they are charged $10 per ton on a temporary basis at Python's of St. Cloud. Mr. Linn is investigating other possibilities for marketing the product. The Council chose to table any action on an increase for D & K, as neither Mr. Linn nor myself were able to make the meeting to provide additional information its requested by the Council. 'rhe Council questioned whether this increase in cost for recycling newspaper was offset by increase in revenue for other materials such as aluminum. Mr. Linn had sent. a copy of his request, its well as a letter from Python's to the City; however, it did not make it into the agenda packet. A copy of those letters are enclosed for your review. One thing that you will notice is that D & K is now being charged on a temporary hasis $10 per ton for "all materials" with the exception of aluminum. Mr. Linn has also sent along some additional information in regard to his product marketing. In the past., the City of Monticello has not requested that the bi-nnetal cans be separated from the aluminum cans in the report; consequently, all of our information is based upon the total of the two. Mr. Linn has indicated thnt aluminum has generally leen around 2,000 pounds a month, so we use this as the breakdown. When referring to February 1992, February 1993, and I' ehrunry 1994, you can see that there has been it significant drop in the revenue from recyclables. The revenue dropped from $993 in February of 1992, to $936 in 1993, to only $416 for February 1994. This drop has incurred even though the revenue for aluminum is up slightly. It is difficult at this time to determine whether or not our recent transient ordinance will have an effect on aluminum can recycling with the City's program. That ordinance went into effect in November, and many people store their aluminum over the winter. In addition, we are not positive that someone nnay not actually set, up it business and recycle aluminum cans as part of a normal business, or that it transient merchant may not conic in once it month and pay the fee. We hope Chat this is it positive thing for our program, but it's too early to tell. Council Agenda - 2/28/94 As mentioned in the agenda supplement for February 14, our current average cost per household for contracting recycling services is $1.15 per month. The additional $340 per month would equate to about a $.16 increase, bringing our avPrege unit. cost. to $1.31 If it continued for a full year, it would he $4,080 for that year. The City of Buffalo is currently paying $1.85 for a similar program without discard mail. Consequently, it is my opinion that the cost of our program is very reasonable when compared with "like" programs. Mr. Linn has also shared with me his actual cost of collection; and based upon that information, this is a very lean contract for D & K, and I can see why they are requesting a supplement to the contract. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative would he to amend the current contract with D & K Refuse and Recycling and pay them an additional $17 a ton for recycling newspaper on a temporary basis effective February 1, 1994. sk CiA huc- 2. The second alternative would he to split the $17 with D & K Recycling by paying them $8.50 per Um for newspaper recycling on it temporary basis. 3. The third alternative would be to negotiate an amount different than those listed above. 4. The fourth alternative would he to request that D & K Recycling continue with this contract until it expires on April 1, 1995. 1) & K would then have the option to notify us of the intent to cancel the contract as per language in the agreement, or they could continue and take the losses, hoping that the time frame is short and the market recovers or they ore able to market elsewhere. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: We have had it guild working relationship with D & K Refuse and Recycling over the past. 26 months. As Public Works Director, I do not like to see any cost increases; however, I believe it is in our best interest to work with 1) & K, its they provide it high level of service to the community at an economical rate. As Public Works Director, I therefore recommend alternatives N1 or #2. With contract negotiations again coming up in April of next year, I believe by treating D & K openly and fairly at this time will Council Agenda - 2/28/94 result in a lower overall cost to us with the next contract as well; and 1 do believe that this temporary situation with the newspaper market will only go on a few months. D. SUPPORTING DATA: February 7 letter from D & K Refuse and Recycling; January 21 letter from Pythons; Material breakdown for recycling revenues from D & K; Quarterly recycling reports for 1993 and a copy of the January and February 1994 report. Please also refer to your February 14 agenda supplement. 10 D&K Refuse and Recycling 29 South 2tst Ave. St. C10ud, Mn 56301 ,.., 612-251-0920 2-7-94 John Simola City of Monticello P.O. Box 1147 Monticello, Mn 55362 Dear John; I'd like to take this time to thank you for the opportunity to serve your community for their recycling collection needs. We have done our best to provide your community with a comprehensive recycling program at an economical price. Recent developments in the end use markets have caused the price paid for certain recyclable materials to decrease. The largest decrease came in the newspaper market. Newspaper has decreased from $7 per ton to $0. In addition, as of January 21, 1994, our company is being charged $10 per ton of newspaper. We need to pass along this cost to our recycling customers. This represents an average increase per month of $352, based on last year's newspaper totals. We hope that this is a temporary situation and we will make adjustments as the market changes. Thank you for your time and if their are any questions, please call me at 251-0920. Sincerely, Randall J. Linn D&K Refuse and Recycling 10; Jamiary 21. 1994 TO: All Suppliers of Recycled Materials FROM: Python's Purrha.sing 551 4's Street NE St. Cloud. MN 56304 RE: NOTIFICATION OF SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE SH1JTV)wt4 Pear Supplier: Python's Purchasing will be doing maintenance on processing equipment during the week of February 14. 1994. THIS IS A SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE SHUTDOWN. This impacts companies that send in baled and boxed materials. We will still handle scheduled loose loads on roll off and packer units. Also- We must institute a $10.00 per ton charge on all materials immediately. This is a temporary ourcharee and is done for the following reasons: ill- We must. prevent a buildup of material in anticlpativn of the scheduled ohut down. Ui- Harkot conditions on matcrlals ora presently This ourcharge will help defray the coot of double handling and storage costo. Again. this is a temporary oituation and the zurcharge will be eliminated in Cha near future. no noon ao conditiono permit. CORPORATE OFFICE 46 North I Oth Avenue P.O. Box 6025, St. Cloud, MN 56302 (612) 253-9553 Printed on Recycled Pontr . 25% Peat Consumer Waste �1 p3. 2 Should you have any questions on what we will handle. please call. We will resume receiving recycled materials starting 2-21-94. Your patience and understanding is appreciated. Sincerely. Thomas J. Maiers. Director of Operations 9:— Kenny Stodolka, Facility ManagerStan Seely. Warehouse Scheduling � 0 D&K Refuse and Recycling 29 South 21st Ave. Sl. Cloud, Mn 56301 612-251-0920 NATEBUL REVEIRIE BREAKDOWN Feb -92 Feb -92 Feb -93 Feb -93 Feb -94 Feb -94 Totals Prices Revenue Totals Prices Revenue Totals Prices Revenue ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tin 5,660 0.015 $84.90 6,250 0.005 $31.25 6,864 0.0075 $51.48 Aluinue 2,000 0.26 $520.00 2,000 0.33 $660.00 2,241 0.34 $761.94 Newspaper 32,780 0.0075 $245.85 32,331 0.005 $161.66 40,583 -0.005($202.91) Cardboard 2,360 0.007 $16.52 2,627 0.004 $10.51 3,089 0 $0.00 Glass 27,900 0.0045 $125.55 13,911 -0.0025 ($34.78) 14,230 -0.01($142.30) Plastic 4,640 0 $0.00 4,356 0 $0.00 3,958 -0.01 ($39.58) "lines 2,980 0 $0.00 1,408 0.005 $7.04 2,502 -0.005 ($12.51) Nail R/A N/A $0.00 N/A N/A N/A 569 0 $0.00 78,320 $992.82 62,883 $835.68 74,036 $416.12 1 1993 Jan Feb Totals Revenue Totals Tin ------------------ 5,700 $19.95 6,250 Aluminuo 2,000 $700.00 2,000 Newspaper 33,200 $166.00 32,331 Cardboard 3,100 $12.40 2,627 Glass 13,060 ($32.65) 13,911 Plastic 5,520 $0.00 4,356 Magazines 2,700 $13.50 »$879.20 1,408 65,280 62,883 July Aug Totals Revenue Totals Tln -------------------------- 6,400 $80.00 6,060 Aluwinus 2,000 $620.00 2,000 Newspaper 38,400 $326.40 32,100 Cardboard 2,560 $12.80 2,860 Glass 12,260 ($30.65) 13,180 Plastic 4,780 $0.00 5,740 Magazines 2,060 $10.30 2,280 68,460 $1,018.85 64,220 'MAL REVEIRIE FOR THE YEAR 1993 Mrcb Aprl Nay June Revenue Totals Revenue Totals Revenue Totals Revenue Totals Revenue --------- ---------------------------------- ----- --------- -------------------- $31.25 11,500 $172.50 6,051 $90.77 8,692 $130.38 8,940 $111.75 $660.00 2,000 $620.00 2,000 $600.00 2,000 $600.00 2,000 $600.00 $161.66 55,220 $552.20 36,350 $363.50 40,014 $400.14 38,000 $332.50 $10.51 4,800 $28.80 2,629 $15.77 3,323 $19.94 2,540 $15.24 ($34.78) 18,500 ($46.25) 12,463 ($31.16) 13,839 ($34.60) 14,080 ($35.20) $0.00 7,080 $0.00 5,173 $25.87 5,715 $28.57 4,900 $0.00 $7.04 2,720 $13.60 2,215 $11.08 1,999 $10.00 1,880 $9.40 ---- ------- -'---------------- ---------- ---- $835.68 101,820 $1,340.85 66,881 $1,075.82 75,582 $1,154.43 72,340 $1,033.69 Sept Oct Nov Dec Revenue Totals Revenue Totals Revenue Totals Revenue Totals Revenue -------------- -------- ------- ------- -------------- --- ------- -------- ----------- $75.75 9,919 $123.99 7,720 $%.50 5,718 $71.48 6,240 S78.00 $600.00 2,000 $580.00 2,000 $560.00 2,000 $520.00 2,000 5560.00 $112.15 59,411 $207.94 43,820 $153.37 43,238 $151.33 44,700 $156.45 $15.73 3,316 $26.53 2,860 $14.30 2,773 $13.87 3,120 $14.04 ($32.95) 23,668 ($118.34) 13,540 ($67.70) 13,408 ($67.04) 14,340 ($71.70) ($28.70) 8,478 ($42.39) 5,660 ($28.30) 4,625 ($23.13) 5,080 ($25.401 $11.40 3,859 $19.30 2,620 $13.10 2,936 $14.68 2,680 $6.70 ---------- '-------------------- --- ------------ - _».__....»_ --------------------- $753.58 110,651 $797.02 78,220 $741.27 74,698 $681.19 78,160 $718.09 $11,029.66 0 D&K Refuse and Recycling opy 29 Sculh 21st Ave. Sl. Cloud. Mn 56301 612-251-0920 DATE: 2-21-94 City of Monticello, The following is your recycling summary for the month of February. Please remit payment to D&K Refuse and Recycling, 29 South 21st Ave, St. Cloud, MN 56301. Material Residential Apartments Total Ton -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 1-31-94 2-03-94 2-14-94 2-17-94 2-02-942-16-94 Tin 1,382 1,086 1,459 1,292 806 839 6,864 3.43 Aluminum 570 469 562 451 120 69 2,241 1.12 Newspaper 8,832 7,798 8,985 9,142 2,560 3,266 40,583 20.29 Cardboard 895 744 549 672 112 117 3,089 1.54 Glass 3,570 2,946 3,099 2,823 975 817 14,230 7.12 Plastic 883 996 682 881 270 246 3,958 1.98 Magazines 618 493 469 668 178 76 2,502 1.25 Nail 133 134 114 102 29 57 569 0.28 Total Lbs 16,883 14,666 15,919 16,031 5,050 5,487 74,036 37.02 Month/Ton 37.02 YTD Total 72.68 Liquor Store: 14 bales @ 175 lbs - 2,450 Batteries: 1 Charges Residential: /.579 x 1.25 m S X973. 75 Apartments: Soy{ x .85 - $ 4d 8, yo Total $ 'ZVOa./S SiZIncee�rGelllyyy, bpm Randall q.9 D&K Refuse and Recycling 4-1 0 6) CITY OF MONTICELLO RECYCLING SUMMARY October through December 1993 2,092 Households, Est. Pop. 5,206 MONTHLY TONS RECYCLED Material OCT NOV DEC Total For 3 Months, Glass 6.77 6.70 7.17 20.64 Cans 4.86 3.86 4.12 12.84 Newspaper 21.91 21.62 22.35 65.88 Cardboard 1.43 1.39 1.56 4.38 Magazines 1.31 1.47 1.34 4.12 Plastics 2_2.83 2,31 2_54 7.68 TOTALS 39.11 37.35 39.08 115.54 TOTAL TONS Pounds/ 37.39 35.71 37.36 36.82 AVE. LBS. Household/ PER MONTH Month Total or Averaee Tons MSW to 119.39 127.69 119.79 366.87 TOTAL TONS compost facility Cubic Yds to 288.00 315.00 299.00 902.00 TL. CU.YDS. compost facility % Total 24.70 22.60 24.60 24.00% AVERAGE Waste Recycled by Weight Ave. 81.3 74.7 78.5 78.2% AVERAGE Participation PER PICKUP Rate Per Pickup SUM MARY4.93: 2/7/94 CITY OF MONTICELLO RECYCLING SUMMARY July through September 1993 2,082 Households, Est. Pop. 5,182 MONTHLY TONS RECYCLED Material JUL AUG SEP Glass 6.13 6.59 11.83 Cans 4.20 4.03 5.96 Newspaper 19.20 16.05 29.71 Cardboard 1.28 1.43 1.66 Magazines 1.03 1.14 1.93 Plastics 2.39 2.87 4.24 TOTALS 34.23 32.11 65.33 Pounds/ 32.88 30.84 63.15 Household/ Month Tons MSW to 142.36 compost facility Cubic Yds to 316.00 compost facility % Total 19.38 Waste Recycled by Weight Ave. 70.6 Participation Rate Per Pickup 150.30 141.36 340.00 345.00 17.60 28.13 78.8 78.0 "Based upon 7 pickups this quarter Total For 3 Months 24.55 14.19 64.96 4.37 4.10 9.50 121.67 TOTAL TONS 38.96 AVE. LBS. PER MONTH Total or Average 434.02 TOTAL TONS 1,000.00 TL. CUNDS. 21.70% AVERAGE 76.1%* AVERAGE PER PICKUP SUM MARY3.93: 10/13/93 O D CPTY OF MONTICELLO RECYCLING SUMMARY April through June 1993 2,067 Households, Est. Pop. 5,145 MMONMY T4 &RIECYCLED Material A'$ Mx JUNE Total For 3 +22,nh, Glass 6.23 6.92 7.04 20.19 Cans 4.03 6.35 6.47 14.86 Newspaper 18.18 20.01 19.00 67.19 Cardboard 1.31 1.66 1.27 4.24 Magazines 1.11 1.00 0.94 3.06 Plastics 2.59 2,86 2A6 7.90 TOTALS 33.44 37.79 36.17 107.42 TOTAL TONS Pounds/ 32.36 36.57 36.00 34.64 AVE. LBS. Household/ Ave. PER MONTH Month 81.1 80.9% AVERAGE Participation Total or Average Tons MSW to 133.26 126.04 147.95 407.26 TOTAL TONS compost facility Cubic Yds to 310.00 257.00 300.00 867.00 TL. CU.YDS. compost facility % Total 20.06 23.07 19.64 20.92% AVERAGE Waste Recycled by Weight Ave. 82.5 79.3 81.1 80.9% AVERAGE Participation PER PICKUP Rate Per Pickup SUMMARY2.93: 9116!93 7 CITY OF MONTICELLO RECYCLING SUB9 ARY January through March 1993 2,053 Households, Eat. Pop. 6,125 MONTELY TONS RECYCLED Material JAN FEB MAR* Total For 3 Months Glass 6.53 6.96 9.25 22.74 Cans 3.85 4.13 6.75 14.73 Newspaper 16.60 16.17 27.61 60.38 Cardboard 1.55 1.31 2.40 5.26 Magazines 1.35 0.70 1.36 3.41 Plastics 2.76 -19 3,54 _8.48 TOTALS 32.64 31.44 60.91 115.00 TOTAL TONS Pounds/ 31.80 30.63 49.60 37.34 AVE. LBS. Household/ PER MONTH Month Total or Averaee Tons MSW 104.09 93.64 117.51 315.24 TOTAL TONS to compost fadlity Cubic Yda 245.00 222.00 272.00 739.00 TL. CU.YDS. to compost facility % Total 23.87 25.14 30.21 26.41% AVERAGE Waste Recycled by Weight Ave. 77.1 77.7 80.7• 78,8% AVERAGE Participation PER PICKUP Rate Per Pickup • 3 pickups in March SUMMARY1.93: 9/16/93 j\ SUMMARY4.92 0 CITY OF MONTICELLO RECYCLING SUMMARY October through December 1992 2,042 Households, Est. Pop. 5,105 MONTHLY TONS RECYCLED Material JUL AUG 9EP Total For 3 Months Glass 7.50 6.09 5.44 19.03 Cans 5.27 3.87 3.67 12.81 Newspaper 18.63 20.12 20.29 59.04 Cardboard 1.23 1.18 1.00 3.41 Magazines 0.94 1.04 0.89 2.87 Plastics 2_59 2_30 2_31 7.20 TOTALS 36.16 34.60 33.60 104.36 TOTAL TONS Pounds/ 35.41 33.88 32.91 34.07 AVE. LBS. Household/ PER MONTH Month Total or Averaee Tons MSW 132.02 129.68 120.18 381.88 TOTAL TONS Landfilled Cubic Yds 337.00 298.00 292.00 927.00 TL. CUNDS. Landfilled % Total 21.50 21.06 21.85 21.47% AVERAGE Waste Recycled by Weight Ave. 81.1 75.8 77.8 78.2% AVERAGE Participation PER PICKUP Rate Per Pickup SUMMARY4.92 0 *NOTE: Estimated; cubic yard records for September destroyed in Vasko fire SUMMARY3.92 O CITY OF MONTICELLO RECYCLING SUMMARY July through September 1992 2,018 Households, Est. Pop. 5,080 MONTHLY TONS RECYCLED Material JUL AUG SEP Total For 3 Months Glass 6.57 6.52 7.92 21.01 Cans 3.65 3.88 5.23 12.76 Newspaper 16.56 17.43 27.70 61.69 Cardboard 1.33 1.14 1.49 3.96 Magazines 0.89 0.78 1.02 2.69 Plastics 2_27 2_44 3_44 8_15 TOTALS 31.27 32.19 46.80 110.26 TOTAL TONS Pounds/ 30.99 31.90 46.38 36.42 AVE. LBS. Household/ PER MONTH Month Total or Averaee Tons MSW 136.33 142.38 118.73 397.44 TOTAL TONS Landfilled Cubic Yds 304.00 310.00 280.00• 894.00" TL. CU.YDS. Landfilled % Total 18.66 18.43 28.27 21.79% AVERAGE Waste Recycled by Weight Ave. 80.7 80.9 80.6 80.7% AVERAGE Participation PER PICKUP Rate Per Pickup *NOTE: Estimated; cubic yard records for September destroyed in Vasko fire SUMMARY3.92 O CITY OF MONTICELLO RECYCLING SUMMARY April through June 1992 1,991 Households, Est. Pop. 5,040 MONTHLY TONS RECYCLED Material APR MAY JUN Total For 3 Months Glass 11.91 7.23 6.91 26.05 Cans 6.05 3.60 3.29 12.94 Newspaper 33.45 19.20 17.60 70.25 Cardboard 1.99 1.05 1.23 4.27 Magazines 3.51 0.79 1.06 5.36 Plastics 1.99 1.93 2.62 6.54 TOTALS 58.90 33.81 32.70 125.41 TOTAL TONS Pounds/ 59.17 33.96 32.85 41.99 AVE. LBS. Household/ PER MONTH Month Total or Average Tons MSW 126.80 120.17 136.00 382.97 TOTAL TONS Landfilled Cubic Yds 283.00 285.00 325.00 893 TL. CU.YDS. Landfilled % Total 31 17 21.96 19.00 24.04% AVERAGE Waste Recycled by Weight Ave. 84.4• 83.7 83.4 83.8% AVERAGE Participation PER PICKUP Rate Per Pickup Tons Elig. 58.90 33.81 32.70 125.41 TOTAL TONS for County Incentive Funding -NOTE: Includes March 30, 1992 (split pickup) SIT"aRVll.91 0 CITY OF MONTICELLO RECYCLING SUMMARY January through March 1992 1,976 Households, Est. Pop. 5,030 MONTHLY TONS RECYCLED Material JAN FEB MAR Total For 3 Months Glass 12.72 13.95 7.79 34.46 Cans 4.24 3.83 5.49 13.56 Newspaper 20.11 16.39 30.26 66.76 Cardboard 1.04 1.18 1.45 3.67 Magazines 0.00 1.49 1.80 3.29 Plastics 2.48 2.32 3.36 8.16 TOTALS 40.59 39.16 50.15 129.90 TOTAL TONS Pounds/ 41.08 39.64 50.76 43.83 AVE. LBS. Household/ PER MONTH Month Total or Averaqe Tons MSW 116.80 97.73 121.50 336.03 TOTAL TONS Landfilled Cubic Yds 277.00 231.00 297.00 805 TL. CU.YDS. Landfilled % Total 25.79 28.61 29.12 27.87% AVERAGE Waste Recycled by Weight Ave. 69.6 60.8 85.7 78.7% AVERAGE Participation PER PICKUP Rate Per Pickup Tons Elig. 40.59 39.16 50.15 129.90 TOTAL TONS for County Incentive Funding o 171�1/_h -. V Council Agenda - 2/14/94 5. Consideration of amendment to contract with D & K for curb -side recycling services. (J.S.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: We have recently learned from Randy Linn of D & K Refuse and Recycling that a significant change has occurred in the market for newspaper. D & K markets their newspaper through Pythons in St. Cloud. As of January 21, D & K went from receiving $7 a ton for the newspaper to paying $10 a ton, a difference of $17. When we generate approximately 20 tons a month, this is about $340. Randy Linn from D & K says that his firm cannot absorb this significant cost increase. Mr. Linn has, therefore, requested that we consider paying the additional cost and ask that we consider this under Section V, Disputes Force Majeure, of the contract. This is believed to be a temporary situation and, hopefully, by summer would be resolved. Currently we pay D & K $.85 per multiple dwelling unit and $1.25 per single family unit for a total of $2,389.65 per month based upon 2,073 total units. This gives us an average cost of $1.15 per month. The additional cost of $340 per month would equate to about $.16, which would bring our average unit cost to $1.31, an increase of $4,080 a year. This would change our total contract value from $28,676 to $32,756 a year. A couple of other things to consider in our recycling cost is that we receive funding from the County of $12,500 for our program. Should we decide not to recycle but send these materials to the Wright County Compost Facility with the garbage, our increase in tipping fees alone would be $44,500 per year, not including extra hauling costs. Even with the $.16 additional cost, the City of Monticello has one of the most economical full programs around, pulling out near 40 tons a month, with participation rates on a bimonthly basis near 80"0. Recycling in Monticello showed a strong gain in late 1993 and has leveled off slightly for the beginning of 1994. Some of this, of course, is due to the cold weather we have had and the snow, which are a little unusual. The amount of recycling is up over last summer. I've included a copy of the January report for recycling and a copy of the force majeure section of the contract. Due to the contract bulk, its not included with your agenda packet, but there are copies for you to review at city hall. 0 Council Agenda - 2/14/94 B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The fust alternative would be to amend the current contract with D & K Refuse and recycling and pay them an additional $17 a ton for recycling newspaper on a temporary basis effective February 1, 1994. 2. The second alternative would be not to pay the additional $17 a ton but to negotiate further or rebid our contract. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director and the City Administrator that the City Council amend our current contract with D & K and pay them an additional $17 a ton for recycling newspaper on a temporary basis. It is our feeling that this will correct itself this summer. Our current contract with D & K Refuse and Recycling will expire on April 1, 1995. We don't believe we would be successful in negotiating further with D & K, as they have laid their true costs on the table, and it would not be in our best interest to rebid our recycling contract at this time. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of January 1994 recycling summary from D & K Refuse and Recycling; Copy of force majeure section of the current contract with D & K 0 Council Agenda - 2/28/94 e. Consideration of reviewing year-end liquor store financial statements. tR.W.I REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: As part of closing out the financial records for the year 1993, the staff has prepared a comparative financial statement for the liquor store operations for the years 1992 and 1993. Liquor Store Manager, Joe Hartman, will be in attendance at the meeting Monday night to go over the report with the Council and answer any questions they may have in regard to its operation. The following is it summary of the financial highlights that the Council may want to review. For the year ending December 31, 1993, total sales at the liquor store were down approximately $10,300 from the previous year. This amounts to slightly less than .7 of 1'bdecrease, which was somewhat expected based on the sales trend we were experiencing during the summer months. On the bright side, though, our cost of merchandise also dropped approximately $20,000, resulting in our gross profit showing an increase, even with the reduced sales volume, by over $10,000. The overall gross profit percentage amounts to 24.02"/., which is in line with our expectations. In regard to general operating expenses, the expenditures for 1993 show an increase of approximately $5,300 over 1992 expenditures, which still leaves the operation with an operating income approximately $4,700 higher than 1992's income at $147,730. Generally speaking, the 1014 operating income is the general area we have always targeted, and the $147,700 income is certainly it respectable dollar amount. The Council is reminded to fiwus on the operating income as the indicator of the operational strength and is reminded not to get too concerned about the net income that also includes interest earnings from investments. For 1993, our actual net income is somewhat lower than last year's primarily due to the fact that a large portion of our investment balance has been utilized in constructing the maintenance building facility, thus depleting our investment balances. Investments have ao bearing on how the liquor store is operating; and for comparison purposes, the operating income is the important part of this financial statement. The only action that is needed at this time would he an acceptance of the financial report as presented. The liquor store financial report is ultimately included in the financial statements prepared by our auditor in the final audil. report for 1993. 1). SUPPORTING DATA: i.I u Copy of financial statements. M MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR REVENUE AND EXPENSES COMPARISON FOR THE YEAR ENDING DEC 31, 1992 AND 1993 1992 1993 YEAR-TO-DATE YEAR-TO-DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT SALES Liquor 415,802 419,483 Beer 872,786 853,014 Nine 154,498 158,704 Other Merchandise 49,527 50,832 M18C Non -Taxable Sales 1,848 2,111 Discounts TOTAL SALES 1,494,461 1,484,144 COST OF GOODS SOLD (1,147,920) (1,127,584) GROSS PROFIT 346,541 23.19% 356,561 'ENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE Personal Services Salaries 103,907 108,768 PERA 3,737 3,847 FICA 7,584 8,051 Insurance 10,111 11,341 Unemployment Benefits I ---------- ---------- TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 125,380 8.39% 132,007 Supplies Office Supplies 195 680 General Operating Supplle 7,490 7,144 Other Supplies 791 ---------- 169 ---------- TOTAL SUPPLIES 8,476 .57% 7,994 24.02% 6.89% .54% H 9 MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR REVENUE AND EXPENSES COMPARISON FOR THE YEAR ENDING DEC 31, 1992 AND 1993 1992 1993 YEAR-TO-DATE YEAR-TO-DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT Other Services & Charges Professional Services 3,225 2,500 Maintenance Agreements 1,500 1,500 Communication 1,013 1,164 Travel -Conference -Schools 107 70 Advertising 4,673 5,195 Insurance 20,630 20,504 Utilities, Electric 9,706 11,211 Utilities, Heating 1,208 1,305 Utilities, Sewer & Water 619 977 Utilities, Refuse Maintenance, Equipment 3,117 1,881 Maintenance, Building 2,790 2,730 Maintenance, Other 492 211 Depreciation --Acquired As 19,095 18,574 Other Misc Expenses 1,311 ---------- 845 ---------- TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CH 69,675 4.66% 68,830 4.64% TOTAL GENERAL & ADMIN EXPENS 203,531 13.62% 208,831 14.07% TOTAL OPERATING INCOME 143,009 9.57% 147,730 9.95% Other Income (Expense) Interest Income 47,486 17,088 Cash Long/Short 28 (43) Sale of Property TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) 47,513 3.18% 17,045 1.15% NET INCOME (EXPENSE) 190,523 ae¢ceaa¢ae 12.75% 164,922 aaeaccaa¢¢ tt.tt% Transfer's In/Out (720,417) (31,654) ADJUSTED NET INCOME (EXPENSE ' (529,894) ¢sa¢aaaaaa 133,268 aaaa¢aaa¢a 1993 YEAR-TO-DATE AMOUNT 419,483 315,788 103,695 24.7% 853,014 666,978 ---------- 186,036 21.8% 158,704 103,949 54,755 34.5% 50,832 33,523 --17,309 34.1% 2,111 1,082 1,029 48.7% 1,484,144 1,121,320 6,264 356,561 24.0% a caceaaaae D MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR GROSS PROFIT BY PRODUCT COMPARISON FOR THE YEAR ENDING DEC 31, 1992 AND 1993 1992 YEAR-TO-DATE AMOUNT Liquor Sales 415,802 Discounts Cost of Sales 310,527 GROSS PROFIT - LIQUOR 105,275 25.3% Beer Sales 872,786 Cost of Sales 692,620 GROSS PROFIT - BEER 180,166 20.6% wine Sales 154,498 Cost of Sales 108,385 GROSS PROFIT - MINE 46,113 30.8% .sc Sales 49,527 Cost of Sales 27,990 GROSS PROFIT - MISC TAXABLE 21,536 43.5% MISC Non-taxable Sales 1,848 Cost of sales 1,587 GROSS PROFIT - MISC NON -TAXA 261 14.1% TOTAL SALES 1,494,461 TOTAL COST OF SALES 1,141,109 TOTAL FREIGHT COST 6,811 TOTAL GROSS PROFIT 346,541 eaaccaacaa 23.2% 1993 YEAR-TO-DATE AMOUNT 419,483 315,788 103,695 24.7% 853,014 666,978 ---------- 186,036 21.8% 158,704 103,949 54,755 34.5% 50,832 33,523 --17,309 34.1% 2,111 1,082 1,029 48.7% 1,484,144 1,121,320 6,264 356,561 24.0% a caceaaaae D MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 31Dec93 Current Assets: Cash Change Fund Investments Accounts Receivable A/R - NSE Checks Inventory Prepaid Insurance TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS Fixed Assets Land & Parking Lot Buildings Furniture & Equipment less: Accumulated Depreciation TOTAL FIXED ASSETS TOTAL ASSETS Liabilities Accounts Payable Due to EDA Fund Sales Tax Payable Salaries Payable Accrued Vacation/Sick Leave Other Accrued Expenses TOTAL LIABILITIES RETAINED EARNINGS TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE 68,674.33 1,600.00 356,367.79 1,775.03 (195.43) 158,014.00 5,496.66 ------------ 591,732.38 46,591.03 199,285.65 75,993.73 (197,027.38) 124,843.03 716,575.41 (1,155,99) 115,000.00 .26 14,246.06 (9,658.49) ------------ 118,431.84 598,143.57 ------------ 716,575.41 .0a.ma—mous Council Agenda - 2/28/94 9. Consideration of reviewing sketch plans and authorizing Dretiaration of preliminary Plat•-ODtlots C and D. Meadow Oak Estates. (K. W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Based on Council action at the last meeting, City Engineer, Bret Weiss, along with myself, met with Mr. John Bergh of Loucks & Associates to review the 18 -acre Outlot C and D parcel for the purpose of determining the best alternative available for creating larger residential building sites. Mr. Bergh is a principal designer who has had experience on working in preparing development plans in areas similar to this project where primary concerns are to salvage as many trees as possible and save as much of the terrain as feasible. Mr. Bergh has been involved in residential developments in the Maple Grove and Plymouth area. During our initial meeting, it was noted that there may not be many alternatives that can be considered when working with only tin 18 -acre parcel that. has to t.ic into two existing road locations. Mr. Bergh, in analyzing the tree cover and topo of the area, looked at a number of D alternatives; but in most cases, changing the road alignments and utilizing different layouts than the one proposed involved extensive grading alterations of the land and removal of a large amount of trees. The proposal at this time would be to create 30 residential lots that tare above average in sire but still should be desirable sites for residential buildings. In the opinion of hoth Bret Weiss and Mr. Bergh, the proposed layout. should minimize the amount of grading and tree removal under this concept. It, may even be possible to enlarge some of the lots slightly and st.i!I only lose one or two Iota from the total, and this is something the Council may want to discuss if you feel that larger lots would be desirable. For example, Lots 1, 2, and :3, along with 13, 14, and lb ore still adequate sized lots in the 100 -ft width range along with approximately 16,000 sq fl; but, if we wanted to make more of the lots in this development larger, we could create four lots out of these six. On the other hand, it may be beneficial to have some of the lots a little smaller than others, as not everyone may wantan excessively large yard to maintain. That's not to say that the entire area can't be built up with nicer homes, but not everyone may desire it Int of vard maintenance. By the City continuing on with this project and controlling how the development is laid out, I think there will he a number of advantages for the City. The first tine is that it will give its it better chance of recapturing not only our initial investmentin this land hot also give us the hest opportunity to repay ourselves for some of the Inst penalty and interest that 12 Council Agenda - 2/28/94 has accumulated on this forfeited property. If we were to just consider the outright sale of the 18 -acre parcel to other developers. it is hard to believe we could obtain more than the initial investment we have in this property or in the $165,000 range. In analyzing the estimated cost of improving these properties and marketing them, it appears very feasible to not only recapture our initial cost but, receive additional funds to help pay for some of the lost penalty and interest we've experienced. Based on estimates by OSM for completing street and utility improvements to the property and allowing for additional funds for grading and platting costs, along with funds for additional landscaping, development entry signs, and also assuming interest holding cost, the City only needs t<t average $22,000 to $23,000 per lot to cover all anticipated cost. With the lots being larger than most lots that are available today and by selling restrictive covenants that will dictate that the homes he of a certain caliber with higher values, there shouldn't be a problem with the City commanding the type of prices that will exceed the $22,000 to $23,000 cost to break even. When the preliminary and final plat is considered, it is suggested that the Council consider covenants and restrictions that will ensure this becomes a nice neighborhood for higher valued homes. Suggestions by the planner include creating it minimum size that each home has to be such as 1,500 sq fl without counting basement area, requiring a certain pitch roof design with a higher pitch that normally equates to a higher valued home, and also requiring such amenities as 3 -car garages on all homes. These types of restrictions will prulect, the values of the homes that are built in this area and also enhance our ability to command a higher price for the lots by creating the image of an 'executive" residential area. If the Council wishes to see some lots enlarged or made smaller, now would he the time before preparing it preliminary/final plat. I hope to have available at. Monday night's meeting an estimate from Dennis Taylor for preparing a preliminary and final plat for your consideration. If Taylor Surveying Inas an acceptable quote, OSM can prepare the grading plan and the utility plans for this subdivision. It is also anticipated that all local realtors will have the ahilily to sell these lots Ihr the City, along with the City itself'. It. is also recommended that each lot have an established price, which may vary depending on sire and/or amenities that the Int captains, that all realtors and the City would use for marketing purposes. This would seem to be the cleanest method and yet make available the (Option of all realtors to sell the lots should they have a buyer who is willing to meet the restrictions and covenants that, would he established. 13 Council Agenda - 2/28/94 D. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: The first alternative would he to accept the proposed layout as presented and authorize the preparation of a preliminary plat based on this concept design. If this design is acceptable, and assuming Taylor Land Surveyors would prepare the preliminary plat, OSM could also commence the grading plan at the same time. If this project is to proceed on schedule, it may be to our advantage to have the improvement project started this summer so that lots would be available yet this summer. Council could recommend changes to the concept design and authorize preparation of preliminary plat based on revised design suggestions. Council could decide not to proceed with the proposed development and offer the property for sale as is or to other developers. I had previously informed Tony Emmerich Construction and Value Plus Homes that this property was now owned by the City and that if they were interested in making a proposal on the land to gel back to me. I had not received any response from either party, but I again informed hoth parties that the City would he looking into preparing a preliminary plat at the February 28 meeting and that any proposals should he suhmitted to the City prior to this meeting date. As of Friday, no response has heen received. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: I believe the staff is convinced that there is it need for creating a neighborhood that contains larger residential sites in the city limits. Whether lite development contains 25 or 30 residential lots. I do not think they will he difficult to sell if we establish minimum restrictions such as S- car garages, architectural controls such as higher pitched roofs, and minimum square footages that will make this it higher valued home neighborhood. In reviewing the cost estimates for developing this property, I think it, will give lite City the hest. opportunity to not only get its original cost hack but to also recapture some of the lost, penalty and interest on our investment. The proposed layout. will definitely minimize grading cost and save as much of the topo and tree cover us possible and yet provides larger lots which ore needed. From my point of view, justthe establishment of n nicer neighborhood could benefit the City in the long run by having an area dedicated for executive type homer: when we are trying to entice industrial companies to locate in Monticello. Many times we see industries locating in 14 Council Agenda - 2/28194 Monticello, but the higher management of the company are still living elsewhere. If the cost estimate for doing the preliminary plat seems reasonable, it is recommended that Taylor hand Surveying do the preliminary plat with OSM providing the grading plan and ultimate utility plans and specs. It would certainly be to our advantage to have these lots available for this summer to get in on the housing market that should he favorable this year. D. SUPPORTING DATA: outline of development cost estimates; Copy of proposed plat layout. 15 DEVELOPMENT COST ESTIMATES Outlets C & D, Meadow Oak Estates 1. Original cost of land $164,500 2. Street & utility improvements* 390,000 3. Grading & platting 50,000 4. Tree plantings, landscaping, + 30 lots entry signs, mist 25,000 5. Interest holding cost** 75.625 Average price per lot needed $23,500 An additional $25,000+ has been added to utility costs for "deeper" sewer line to be able to service an area to the west of this property. This cost should be deducted from our calculations, as we would recapture the additional costs through future "area assessment." *' Under a worst case scenerio, I assumed that it would take 5 years to sell all 30 lots and also assumed we sold 6 per year. The interest holding costs were calculated on the City spending $390,000 for improvements, $50,000 for grading/platting, and assumed that we would have immediately sold the raw land for $165,000 to someone else if we didn't develop ourselves. Estimated costs $705,125 Less: Sewer oversizing (25,000) 680,125 Option til + 30 lots Average price needed each lot $22,670 $680,125 Option #2 + 28 lots Average price needed each lot $24,290 Option N2 assumes we only have 28 lots rather than the sketch proposal of 30 lots. Because of the "larger" size of these proposed lots and our intention to create an upscale neighborhood by requiring (3) car garages, requiring minimum home square footage, and other architectural controls, I would think the cheapest lots in this development should sell for the average price noted above. Many of the lots will he capable of having walkouts and will contain trees and ponds. This should make them drsirahle residential sites and allow us to set a higher price than the average price noted earlier to recover our costs. COST. EST: 2/24/94 (D E Council Agenda - 2/28/94 to. Consideration of aonointine Council member to ulanning committee for alley reconstruction oroiect. W.S.1 A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: On September 27, 1993, at the conclusion of the public hearing for the alley improvement project in the downtown area, the City Council voted to establish a committee for the purpose of preparing a plan for reconstruction of the downtown alleys. There appeared to be consensus among those at the public hearing that they would rather see major improvements to the alleys rather than patchwork. The Council voted to establish the committee but did not appoint Council representation to that committee, and apparently no one volunteered for the duty. Consequently, I bring this hack before the City Council to actually begin the work of committee selection. I would suggest that the City Council appoint one member and that we have two members from each of the three alleys considered for improvement., along with City staff members as needed. We would then seek the advice of the City Engineer or Planner as required. A copy of the minutes from September 27, 1993, are enclosed for your review. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative would be to appoint a City Council member or ask for a volunteer to serve on the alley committee and then solicit at least two members from each of the alleys under consideration for improvement. 2. The second alternative would be to structure the committee in some other fashion as the Council feels appropriate. 3. The third alternative would he to drop the proposed improvement at this time. C. STAFF RECO)MME NDATION: Approximalely a month ago, Steve Johnson called and asked if we would get someone from the City Council appuinted to the committee so we could start looking at doing the project this year. Consequently, I have brought this back before ,you to actually begin establishing the committee. As Public Works Director, I recommend that the City Council begin establishing the committee as outlined in alternative til. 1). SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of Council minutes from September 27, 1993. 16 Council Minutes - 9/27193 $. Continuation of public hearing on Proiect 93-09C. Allev Imorovements. John Simola reported that the public hearing was continued to today's date due to the previous lack of bids for the project. We have now obtained bids for the work and have put together a list of properties with proposed costs for each property. At the same time, we have received information from land owners adjacent to the alley that would like to see additional work done in conjunction with the alley improvements. The work proposed by the adjacent property owners would make the project less of a patch job and could involve replacing portions of existing parking areas. Simola summarized the situation by saying that there is support for the project but not as it is presently designed and suggested that since the project as designed doesn't seem to address the needs of the local businesses, perhaps a committee could be formed to improve the design. At this point in the meeting, Ken Maus closed the public hearing. After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Brad Fyle to establish a committee for the purpose of preparing an improved plan for reconstruction of subject alleys and associated improvements. Motion carried unanimously. C Council Agenda -2/28/94 it. Consideration of a resolution authorizing feasibility study and preparation of plans for Cardinal Hills, phase IV. (J.O.) A. RFFRRENCR AND 13ACKGROIJND: The Value Plus developers have requested that the City complete public improvements associated with development of phase IV of the Cardinal Hills subdivision. Development financing and associated development agreements will he nearly identical to the agreements governing the previous four phases. Following is a time line for project completion under alternative til below. Authorize feasibility study and February 28 preparation of plans and specs .r . 16 Approve feasibility study and plans April 1 IL and specs and authorize advertisement for bids Rid opening date May 6 Accept hid and award contract/order May 9 improvement Project completion date September 1 ALTERNATIVE, ACTIONS: Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing preparation of feasibility study and plans and specifications for phase IV of the Cardinal Hills residential subdivision. Motion contingent on developer providing $25,000 deposit covering the cost of the plans and specifications. The $25,000 deposit is necessary should the project he halted prior to Council awarding the project. 2. Motion to deny adoption of resolution authorizing preparation of feasihilily study and plans and specifications for phase IV of the Cardinal Hills residential subdivision. This alternative should he selected if the City Council no longer wishes to complete the projects on a public improvement hasis. This would force the developer to have the project done privately with 17 Council Agenda - 2128/94 complete private financing. Past experience has shown that the current method for installing and financing public improvements for the Cardinal Hills subdivision has worked well. Although financing projects privately and completing projects using contractors hired directly by private developers does work (Oak Ridge), City staff has found that generally quality control is better when the City completes the project. In addition, the City administrative staff needs to spend less time monitoring projects when completed through the public improvement process. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: �o Staff recommends alternative U. y� D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of resolution. 1a Council Agenda - 2/28/94 12. Consideration of treating wastewater trucked in from the Creek Ridge development in St. Michael. US.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Mr. Tony Emmerich is developing a residential area in the city of St. Michael known as Creek Ridge. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency will not allow any additional sewage to enter the City of St. Michael's wastewater treatment facility, as it is currently at capacity. The City of St. Michael is in the process of rebuilding their wastewater treatment plant to increase the capacity and should go on line with the expanded facility in early 1995. Mr. Emmerich has requested that the City of Monticello consider treating the domestic sewage from Creek Ridge. The sewage would be trucked in to our wastewater treatment plant Monday through Friday during regular business hours. It is my understanding that Creek Ridge will have a holding tank of sufficient capacity so that weekends or inclement weather do not create problems. I've informed Mr. Emmerich that the City of Monticello currently does have a policy for serving customers outside the city limits and that the basic policy requires those people outside the city limits to pay :1 times the normal hookup charge and 3 times the disposal charge. Since there is no actual hookup, only the disposal charge would apply. I also informed Mr. Emmerich that we would need to take this before the City Council, as the original policy was intent to serve the OAA area or township area immediately adjoining the city. A copy of our current policy is enclosed for your review. Mr. Emmerich has indicated that they anticipate a maximum of 50 homes would be constructed during the period of time they would need alternate disposal. If we assume it maximum of 250 gallons per day for fill homes, this is about 12,500 gallons per day. Our current rate for sewage for city residents is $1.65 per 100 cu ft. Three limen the rate would be $4.95 per 100 cu ft., which translates to $6.82 per 1,000 gallons. Should the flow meet the maximum of 12,600 gallons per day, the cost to Mr. Emmerich for disposal would he $82.75 per day. We currently have adequate capacity at the wastewater treatment plant to handle this additional load. If the waste is hauled frequently and not allowed to become septic (or rotten, so to speak, we should have no additional odor problems at the wastewater treatment plant because of the 19 Council Agenda - 2/28/94 additional loading. Consequently, the Council should look at whether or not our policy and/or rate structure would apply in this case. Please refer to the letter of request from Jon Bogart for Tony Emmerich. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative would be to determine that the City Council wishes to assist Mr. Emmerich in his development and that the current policy would apply to this situation. We would continue to treat the waste from Creek Ridge until the City of St. Michael completes its wastewater treatment plant expansion or at such time that the waste proves to be a problem at the City of Monticello's wastewater treatment plant. 2. The second alternative would be to accept the waste but modify or increase the rate structure to cover any special handling requirements and/or problems. 3. The third alternative would be to turn down the request. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION We certainly see no reason why the City couldn't assist Mr. Emmerich in this case, us we do have the additional treatment plant capacity. We are currently w1king with PSC to see if there would he any additional unexpected costs on their part handling the waste, whether they would have to do some special monitoring or provide access to a location inside the plant on it regular basis. We probably won't have that information until Monday evening's meeting and can present it, at that time. But currently staff feels that either alternative #1 or #2 would be recommended in this case. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of letter of request from Tony Emmerich through Jon Bogart of John Oliver & Associates; Copy of letter from the PCA to the City of St. Michael; Copy of current policy. 20 r, FAS 6:2441388S JOHN OLIVER ASSC P02 John Oliver & Associates, Inc. Lo fSumyint t20 D Armut Ilk River, NN $1220 Land Surv.rlu� � tend Plaenlnp !4121111.2077 • %u 4414441 y���i■�& February 24, 1994 Jeff O'Neil Assistant City Administrator City of Monticello P.O. Box 1147 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Temporary sewage acceptance from Creek Ridge, St. Michael, MN Dear Jeff, Tony Emmerich has asked that 2 write a letter to you detailing the specifics of his request that the city of Monticello accept on a temporary basis sewage from the plat of Creek Ridge in the City of St. Michael. The city oft$t,, Michael is currently rebuilding or will noon be rebuilding *hgee oewage treatment plant as to increase their capacity. My understanding is that the new plant will be on line in early 1995. Therefore the city of St. Michael will allow us to build in the plat of St. Michael with the provision that we transport the domestic towage resulting from the plat of Creek Ridge to another sewage treatment plant. The MPCA has reviewed our plan and has deemed it acceptable. We therefore would like to hire a hauler to transport the domestic sewage to the treatment plant in Monticello where it can be safely disposed of. we would like to begin the building of homes in the spring of this year. We anticipate that the maximum volume of sewage that we will haul will be between the months of January and March of 1993. At that time we anticipate 40-50 homes will be constructed and contributing domootie sewage from use as single family homes. Should capacity at the Monticello plant prove to be a problem we will move our excess capacity to an MWCC plant or other wastewater treatment facility. if you have any questions please feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, Jo or i Aosoc. B t, P.E. Civil nginser 0 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency February 9, 1994 The Honorable Joanne Silbernick Mayor, City of St. Michael City Hall St. Michael, Minnesota 55376 Re: St. Michael Municipal Wastewater Issues Creek Ridge Development Dear Mayor Silbernick: This letter is in response to a letter from John Oliver b Associates regarding the Creek Ridge development. In that letter, the company has proposed to Install a collection system followed by holding tanks to serve the Creek Ridge development. Normally, the city of St. Michael would collect and treat the wastewater under their National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. However, the city of St. Michael is currently under a sever moratorium. This moratorium prohibits the connection of any homes or businesses to the city's sanitary system. The sever extension moratorium is in place because the city's facility is at its design capacity. The MPCA staff has reviewed the proposal and find it allowable at this time. The project will require a sanitary sever extension permit from the MPCA. The holding tanks will be required to be installed in accordance with Minn. Rules ch. 7080. The tank pumpings must be taken to a MPCA permitted wastewater treatment facility currently treating domestic waste. The city of Monticello was proposed as a possible destination and the MPCA will allow this as long as the city remains in compliance with terms and conditions of its NPDES permit. It would be prudent to have an agreement in place prior to commencement of construction. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me aat ( 2) 296-1751. S i '% I. _ Enforcement Municipal Section Water Quality Division TRE:jmg cc: Tom Salikovski, Wright County Planning b Zoning John Simola, City of Monticello 1% Jon Bogart, John Oliver b Associates Dawn Grossinger, City of St. Michael Del Haag, MPCA, Brainerd Regional Office 520 Lafayette Rd. N.; SI. Paul, MN 55159.4194; (612) 296.6300 (vo¢o): (812) 282.5332 (TTY) Regional Printed Duluth • Brainerd • Detroit Lakoa • Marshall tram • papal 1 ter O E0� OOVanurury Employrr • Printed on recyUod popor ca+tam4q at least 10•I, Ii0orf hdn p4per r4tytlod by tomumen SEWER AND WATER SERVICE POLICY FOR PROPERTIES OUTSIDE THE CITY OF MONTICELLO The City may contract to allow hookup to City sewer and water from systems outside the city limits. Such systems shall be inspected and certified by a registered civil engineer at the cost of the applicant to meet the minimum standards of the Minnesota Department of Health, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and the City of Monticello Engineering Department. The City will not accept responsibility for the actual installation or maintenance of such lines outside the city limits but shall establish standards to protect the integrity of the municipal system. Since the administration expenses associated with sewer and water services are generally assumed through ad valorem taxes and ad valorem taxes in the Township and properties outside the city limits are not available, excess charges for such services are found to be reasonable and just. since it is recognized that governmental and institutional users are of the general benefit to the community at large, a reduced rate can be offered to those bodies. The measurement and control of water and sewer usage shall be as outlined in the City Ordinance, I. Hookup Charges for Water or Sewer 1. Residential, commercial, or industrial* users will be billed three times the normal rate plus engineering review costs as necessary. 2. Governmental and institutional users will be billed at the normal rates plus engineering review costs as necessary. II. Users Fees for Water or Sewer 1. Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Userec A. Billing shall be three times the normal rates. B. The minimum bill per Quarter shall be $125. 2. Governmental and institutional users shall be billed at 1-1/4 times the normal rates. This policy shall be in effect by order of the City Council on October 27, 1986. *NOTE: Definitions of user classes shall be as found in the City Ordinance. 20/24/86 0 Council Agenda - 2/28/94 ts. Consideration of updating the utility billing system. IW.K.1 A. REFERENCE ANI) BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to consider an update to the utility hilling system. Because the City is unique in our recycling process and there are no computerized utility systems that include a standard recycling program, we have improvised our current system. For the last. three Years we have used customer fields created for other uses. Examples: Current Field Use Designed Currently Used Change Field Name: For: For: Name To: County Code Minnesota county # in household-- Hsehold # coding system sewer hilling Social Security Tax exemption on Lift station code Lift station SS henefits for numbers senior citizens Bank Number Automatic Recycling zones Rec Zone withdrawal Bank Account Automatic Bar code numbers Rec Number withdrawal on recycling bins With the number of apartments, mobile home parks, and rental property in Monticello, our city will always he on the move. If these field names were changed so the titles matched and the information was retained permanently, it would help with time, clarity, and accuracy in maintaining the utility hilling program. Time would be the main purpose of updating our current system. Because the system is being used other than the way it was designed, it requires that each of these four fields he re-entered each time it new resident is entered in the system. In 1993, :197 people moved to a new address. It is sufe to say that close to that, number of residents were sent final hillings also. This is approximately 800 accountchanges in our system of 1880 accounts, which is it 441; rate of change. With growth expected for this year, we du not anticipate it decrease in these calculations. Clarity is extremely important. Because everyone helps customers at the front desk, it is very confusing for those who do not work in utility hilling on it regular hasis to look up infitrnuttion when the titles on the screen do not indicate the actual information being stored in that. field. 21 Council Agenda - 2/28/94 Accuracy is important in all areas, and keeping track of recycling bins and bar codes tends to be a continual process. Changing an account many times a year allows for possible errors which would be eliminated if the fields were retained permanently. Besides the recycling aspect, the lift station codes kept in the Social Security field could cause consumption reports to be off if not entered or if changed by mistake. The County Code field is actually being used to store the number of people residing in a household. This number is necessary to determine the sewer billing on mid -year move -ins and move -outs. The cost to update the utility system would be $4,352. The amount was not budgeted for in the 1994 data processing budget, but according to the City Administrator, sufficient funds would be available. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Authorize staff to update the current system at a cost of $4,352. 2. Continue using the current system. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Office Manager and the Utility Billing Clerk that the Council authorize the update of the current utility system to update field titles and change fields to retain information permanently and thus improve time, clarity and accuracy in the office. D. SUPPORTING DATA Computer screen prints of Customer Master File Maintenance 22 L) ...,....�.......... I .............. .......... .--- .. _ .. ........................ •� cgigT KEY �RC!R-YT ev OSf P=t/Ar+DA 42I 16/e4 is ..O7„60 �• ............................,........• - • .. .,,.......G.•.......... 2/1410h CITw, OF !MnTICELLO 11 • 0 CUSTOMEP .�bSTEP FrLE NAIu TEPAUCE — ul-001 Account "O"Mer: 001 0309 00 00 care* 'I uumoer:. 1SS-.500r113415 Custdnise Nemii MOdt,UnD TRAugPURTATI^u, tortt MDOLWM TR Customer Aadrt ate QARUDDO OQ E Route seat: 00001 Customer Aodr29 Carr tart City-stst:4=Ziut NON_TIC_e LLO NN me? '0000 Ant._•t Service Addeo its OAKW0oo OR E1 Residential Tele*honet eusinea/ O040;h u Account Tva*: C Penalty Coos[ U_est Account of 00702910000 No. of l+eterst 1 Mon 9tnce 04101 1.0 Isdi S Oarbaye Amtt duoget dill tB':udget-Ame_u_n11 Sew440 Amtt 0 'v 0:1' oiled. Amt.t ua omer Oe.l 'D': Aount -D uer 9e.07 Roe GRED OAR 'CART "640 TN. Datet RE6 R[Cy b Oerno a units: Meier Card Codtt Oeoos'it Oat*t Omer ftamet Cart Silo: owner Addrt A.Jorft .C4titstoter2/01 Owner Tvm*I Owner ehonet Comments: Owner 001 10'1 C*d+t:tv 1 44turp to Previous Soreen . No U04st0 Current Changes County Code Household'# Social Security Lift Station Bank Number Recycling Lone Bank Account Recycling Numbor C IF Council Agenda - 2/28/94 14. Consideration of nurchasin¢ Planfile system for mat) storatre. (K. D. ) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND Council is asked to consider purchasing a new map storage system for city hall to replace the current hanging file system used for storing plat maps, sketch plans, grading/drainage plans, etc., which was purchased in December 1988. The current system served its purpose over the last five years in helping us to organize and store our maps in an orderly fashion; however, because this is an open storage system, the maps are not protected like our other records. In addition, this system requires that many maps be clipped together so that if one map is needed, the entire group of maps in that section must be taken apart in order to take the one map needed, or the entire section of maps must he transported to the office or meeting where the map is needed. The result is many maps being moved around unnecessarily, and they are becoming torn. The system itself is also showing wear, tis the knobs that tighten the groups of maps into place are breaking off, making it very difficult to remove and file maps. Staff is proposing to purchase a Pianfile system that stores maps much like other records. They tire placed in large "file folders" and stored vertically in an enclosed cabinet which contains flexible canvas pocket bottoms that grip the folders to prevent the bottom edges of drawings from curling. When a map is needed, the "file folder" containing that map is pulled from the cabinet, the map is removed from the file folder, and the file fodder is returned to the cabinet. This system will prevent a group of maps being transported to an office or meeting when only one is needed, will save wear and tear on the maps, and is much more efficient in time spent filing/retrieving. The system being proposed will hold approximately 3,000 maps in active storage (easily accessible) and 6,000 maps in inactive storage (tighter sturagu For ions accessililityl. The cost of this syslonl Grunt CI''l of Minneapolis is $2,715, plus approximately $130 for extra folders. Adding 6.514, sales tax brings the total to $3,029.92. There is sufficenl money in the budget to cover this cost. An amount of $4,000 was placed in the lf)92 budget for it plain paper fax machine in anticipation of increased use its businesses became more dependent nn this type of communication; however, because of the problems we have been experiencing with the current map filing system. I believe we need to update our map filing system soon and am proposing that we use the $4,000 to purchase the new map filing Svs(eal. 23 Council Agenda - 2/28/94 B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Authorize staff to purchase the Planfile storage system from CEI of Minneapolis at a cost of $3,029.92, including tax. 2. Continue using the current hanging file system. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the City Administrator and Office Manager that the Council authorize the purchase of the Planfile storage system as noted in alternative kl. We feel the current hanging file system no longer fits the needs of the City and it would be best to purchase a new system at this time. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Photo showing Planfile storage system from CEI brochure. 24 Ulrich Advantages hcn filing convenience counts, it's got in be Ulrich. Rather than hassling with bulky drawers and heavy stacks of drawings• simply select the folder which contains your document, draw it about rA out, then locale and remove your drawing. It's that simple. To refile, just slip the document into its proper location, then glide the folder back into the cabinet. Documents are housed safely within the protective confines of a fielder, neatly. and under gentle compression until they arc needed. Net mon climbing 1.6. card. — CMH IM emin inside of IM lid .M aH.,rd ' bene span, Ira det.iad inde.iap. 11M) lluy F.W. — .n, .W—d n ilh t%0al, • deatpl , 0.1 - Wig ."kv M. uilh.M Min Me. 7hp Arerw — mimmi... ... it, .pa,.— inp ntal Ih.n apxe.d }}.Nlf• .wee dmrer. Watrr 1'ndHlhm lap prom / Int e.ManlxlnM penin). start 'loops Inm.p-1,6.1 y.lrnn, 000k.6) n.dund valid dun). S-11, Kr• h. t. .)antras rdh r•arml try ma r rn•Il.xh .n.nlahlr 15nuhm.nnM h. I..�nxnal 1'Yln.11. I.n Ilrrl l.. 1. Ir.l IIIII sue Jrrl. .1.•IIrnJ.rlp .M IM nry.lxwuM 14.+.h•. .colo. e. Ida .hllrn,m .ur. Ir ar ur.: '.MW —nit ...4 . ...... I . awnn mn,mn it Iethiers for knreling trot the flaw, ell filing i.. Jane in Itttist height. Check the advantages 111' Ulrich Wrtical Filet a Active riling capacity of 30111-3.600 sheds (equal m 30 flat drawers). • Maximum capacity for archive storage up to 6.1100 sheds. • Saves 35%-30% of floor space /tar conventional Oat drawers. a Drawings stay Oat and sml.nlh. a Fast, easy, sane height access to drawings. • No alteration to the drawing required by the system. a Prkc is 35%-30% less than flat drawers of equal capacity. a The system staff is proposing does not include insulation. yea 1 /p .l. I.b - puxhhuulm ea.e or arcea.. • pore PPdn,tlall — Fully /Inwlalnl Ihdxhle•.ael call c..nxlnr•IhM Ihnuph.ul the Planfik and Minifik, pn.ide. Imne fin, P"*d Ii M In.. ..y o1wr nnpinul dr—inp r.MnH 0.9119hk larkh .*In t 1'maprn.hln S)atml .npryMa IM hdd— W lhx'il C.MIenN orale pmlle .nilmmemnpn,..xM w'hrllrr n'..—.Mel m nuamwm rupm•n), IM a•..mem. tar nulmanMl lr•Ihre) Il.l .ml .n..xh, Irl .n'. r..d.h• 1'.ma. Nrhhlnp rh.r•. IM Ndxnn ;d e.a'h P+41 oral rhnnna". nm p.—M.1) .d hog M P1 TIxnp IM I—. Mr., .d IM h.hh•r...I .ulprnlu;p Ilr•m al.nr Ile• auM.wl 16.n -- \rN111'a.trn Iwlr reln.enp n lull) l—kd hoe ray Council Agenda - 2/28194 15. Consideration of special meeting or workshop for wastewater treatment plant expansion planning. (J.S. ) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: As part of the facilities planning procedure for the expansion of the wastewater treatment plant, staff, OSM, and RCM need to sit down with the Council and look at some of the issues to be studied with the plan. Of significant importance is the projected growth of the city, including residential, commercial, and industrial, and how that affects the size of the proposed expansion. We don't expect the meeting to last for more than an hour or two, but it is necessary. We expect to have most of the data in rough form during the second week of March. Consequently, we could schedule the special meeting anytime after the 10th of March. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative would he to schedule a special Council meeting or workshop for the purpose of evaluating preliminary data for the wastewater treatment plant facility plan. 2. The second alternative would he to start early or run late on one of our normal meeting dates. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The building committee for phase 11 of the public works facility meets at 5:30 p.m. nn March 14 at city hall. Should the Council decide to meet at that time, we could change that meeting. Staff is open to it special meeting or an early start of a regular Council meeting. Or even if there is a short agenda, which we don't foresee in the near future, one could hold it during the regular meeting. 1). SUPPORTING DATA: p k'1 None.Irilk ,11` A 25 Council Agenda - 2/28/94 16. Consideration of 7th annual Junk Amnesty Day on May 7. 1994. (J.S.I A. RF,FFRENCF AND BACKGROUND Last year, Junk Amnesty Day was held May 1, 1993. The turnout was slightly less than 1992 with approximately 147 of the city households being served. We recycled 53,463 pounds of various materials. In addition, we disposed of approximately 200 cubic yards of household goods, 77 mattresses and box springs, and 30 cubic yards of demolition (used building materials). 1993 was a little different than previous years in that we accepted fluorescent light bulbs. We took in 1,146 bulbs and the fees were paid by the customer. In addition, this was the first time we took demolition debris. JMF provided their services for a $50 setup fee, and they charged a small fee to those individuals bringing in used building materials. This year we won't be taking Fluorescent light bulbs, as Lighting Plus now accepts them at their place of business on West 3rd Street. We will, however, be taking demolition material again this year. We have contacted Veit out of Rogers, MN, to see if they would provide their service free of charge to Monticello residents, as there was sonic indication that they were willing to do so lust year. If this is so, it would save the city the $50 setup charge as well as the disposal fees charged directly to the residents. We moved the program up one hour earlier in 1993 and operated from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. With the entry lanes being on Sandberg Road, traffic flowed quite smoothly especially with the extra help we got from the Jaycees, Explorer Scouts, Rod and Gun Club, Women of Today, and the Connect 4 students who all braved the cold, rainy weather to help us out.. The cust of our program for 199:1 was $5,914.94. This is about $50 less than our cost in 1992. As we discussed tit the conclusion of last year's Junk Amnesty Day, rather than doing extensive advertising in the local papers, we will he direct mailing to the city residents the announcement and details of our program its well its including it brief introduction in the spring newsletter. Enclosed is a summary of the 1993 Junk Amnesty Day for your review. The proposed date and time for this year is Saturday, May 7, 1994, from 8 a.m. to :1 p.m. We will, therefore, tike anyone who is in line to the commuter parking lot by 3 p.m. Depending on the length of the line, we can finish up in one or two hours after that. 26 Council Agenda - 2/28/94 B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. To authorize City Council to hold the 7th annual Junk Amnesty Day on May 7, 1994, based upon the 1993 plan with the exception of fluorescent light bulbs. 2. To authorize holding Junk Amnesty Day on May 7, 1994, but to modify the plan as requested by the City Council. 3. To discontinue Junk Amnesty Day. 4. To consider holding a spring and fall Junk Amnesty Day. This would have little effect on our spring planning but would get us set up for a fall day, which usually takes a couple months of planning to get things lined up. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director, that City Council authorize Junk Amnesty Day as outlined in alternative #1 above. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the 1993 Junk Amnesty Day summary; Copy of the traffic plan and site layout. 27 CITY OF MONTICELLO 1893 "JUNK AMNESTY DAY" SUMMARY Date Held: May 1, 1993 Public Hours: 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. Paid Workers: 6 Volunteers: 10 City Equipment Used: 2 rubber -tire loaders 1 pickup truck & 1 van 40 traffic cones Households Served: 275 (14.0'7v of city households) Recyclers: 1) & K Refuse and Recycling (St. Cloud) Appliance Recycling Center of America (Mels.) Buffalo Junction Amoco (Buffalo) I,ake TV (Maple Lake) Disposal Contractors: Den)con Disposal (household goods) JW (demolition material) Items Recycled: A. 167 household appliances (28,390 lbs) 13. 14,400 lbs of scrap iron and metal C. 508 Ibs of scrap aluminum paid fur by D & K Recycling D. 1,330 lbs (If vehicle lead batteries (:I8 units) Is. 2,135 lbs or 305 gallons of used motor oil Ie. 4,160 lbs or 208 tires C. 1,11110+ lbs or 1,146 fluorescent light bulbs It. 1,540 Ibs or 22 color TV's fur pmts (ir rebuilding I. 'Total: 5:1,463 lbs (Items A through H) Household Goods A. 200 cu yds of furniture, carpet, cunsole'I'V's Disposed Of: I1. 77 mattresses & Irux springs G 30 cu yds of demolition (tised building materials) Cost: Labor(city workers) $1,179.89 Advertising (Wright Way, Times, sign rent) 737.05 Appliance pickup (Saturday) 1,58:1.00 Household goods & mattress disposal 2,265.(1(1 Demolition material disposal (set tip) 50.00* I' luorescent bull) (set till) 1(10.0(1*" $5,914.94 (1992 - $5,966.40) ) NOITS: " JMI-, charged residents it (otal of $18).(10 "Reimbursed by Wright County 1" 94 R.�Y ENt TY 6 I� Oakwood Drive "nM AMNESTY DAY JUNK (+AOy 7,1994 t ng o rt"pdu rieoseiYewaYs btOck Ente, ltei�, ► r ' S d ,q Good Council Agenda - 2/28/94 17. Consideration of demolishine the Cole house near Citv Hall. IJ.S.1 A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City last discussed this issue back in August of 1991. We looked at costs of $18,000 to $19,000 to bring the house up to code using local area contractors, or approximately $8,000 to bring the house up to code supplementing the outside contract work with City staff and summer help. We also considered demolishing the house for around $4,000. The City Council directed staff to prepare the house for cold storage and table consideration for demolishing the house. We have had a couple of individuals interested in moving the house, but they backed out after checking into the actual cost of doing so. Over the past two years, the City Council authorized sale of the kitchen cabinets to a local individual, the furnace was removed from the house and is now used to heat the new Chamber building, and the house has been broken into several times. A little more damage was done to the interior of the house each time. Consequently, we are further away from the possibility of refurbishing the house. Since it is becoming more and more of an eyesore each year, we thought we would bring it back to you for your consideration. At this time, we tire considering only demolishing the house, as the garage portion is being used by the City for storage, and it has never been broken into. 13. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. To authorize staff to advertise for the demolition and removal of the Cole house. The City would then regrade and seed the lot this spring. SA'�`li 2. To leave the house its it is C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director and City Administrator to authorize advertisement for demolition of the Cole house with the bids to he reviewed by City Council at a later date. D. SUPPORTING DATA: No additional information is provided at this time. However, this issue has been debated by the City Council on October 22, 1990; May 13, 1991; and August 12, J$Yll. The agenda packet and minutes from those meetings are available tit city hull should anyone want to look over all the past discussions regarding this agenda item. 28 Council Agenda - 2/28/94 tis. Consideration of replacement of 1978 International heavy duty snowulow truck. IJ.SJ A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND The public works department is proposing to replace the 1978 International snowplow truck. The truck is equipped with a 6 -yd dump box, a sander, a side -mounted wing, and an 11 -ft front plow. The truck has seen a lot of use with the City's fleet over the years, but it has not been one of the shining stars of the snowplow fleet. Over the past several years, if a truck is to break down, the 1978 International is the one that breaks down first. 1 has been endearly named " Leana" due to its distinctive lean to the right with the wing installed and the box loaded with sand. In preparation for replacement of this 16 -year old unit, we placed a total of $55,000 in the street and snow and ice budget. We assume the trade-in value or outright sale of the truck would yield an additional $7,000. Our main snowplow fleet consists of four heavy duty dump trucks with wings, plows, and sanders. The 1978 International is the oldest. Following is a list of the other three trucks. 1985 International S Series single axle dump truck with 6 -yd box, sander, humper-mounted wing, and snowplow 1988 LS 8000 Ford single axle dump truck with 10 -yd box, sander, bumper -mounted wing, and snowplow 1992 Ford 1,8000 Series dump truck with 10 -yd box, sander, bumper -mounted wing, and snowplow All three of the new dump trucks are diesels. We would be specifying a diesel in the new truck. To keep the truck as maneuverable as possible for cul-de-sac work, we would he specifying it single axle truck with it short wheel base and, again, a standard 6 -yd box. II. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: The first alternative is to authorize advertisement for bids for a new heavy duly dump truck with snowplow equipment. The truck would he hid separately from the dump body and the snow equipment. 29 Council Agenda - 2/28/94 The second alternative would he not to advertise for a replacement for the 1978 International. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director and Street Superintendent that the City Council authorize advertisement for bids to be reviewed at a later date for replacement of the 1978 International as outlined in alternative U. D. SUPPORTING DATA None. 30 Council Agenda - 2/28/94 19. Consideration to adopt a resolution calling for a public hearing for the modification of the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Proiect No. 1. modification of the TIF Plans for TIF District Nos. 1.1 to 1.15. and the adoption of the TIF Plan for T1F District No. 1.16. (O. K.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Tax Increment Finance (TIF) District No. 1-16, an 11 -year Economic District, is being created for Polycast Mfg. of Annandale, Inc. The Private Redevelopment Contract, prepared by Holmes & Craven, is between the HRA and Schulz Properties, a Minnesota general partnership. Minimum improvements include the construction of a 16,640 sq R metal office/production facility on 4.4 acres of industrial land. The up -front TIF assistance of $55,000 will write-down the land cost for the property described as Lot 3, Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park. Projected employment is 20, and the minimum estimated market value (EMV) for the land and building is $400,000. Copies of the TIF Plan for TIF District No. 1-16 were distributed to the school, county, and hospital district on February 11, 1994. The HRA will hold a public hearing on the acquisition and disposition of raw lands and adopt the resolution relating thereto and adopt a resolution on the TIF Plan on Murch 2. The site and huilding plan review and commitment for financing through a local lending institution and the Small Business Administration (SBA) are in process. At this time, the City Council is asked to adopt the enclosed resolution calling for it public hearing on Monday, March 14, 1994, tit approximately 7 p.m. 13. ALTFRNATIVF. ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt the enclosed resolution calling for it public hearing on March 14, 1994, for TIF District No. 1.16. 2. Motion to deny the adoption of the enclosed resolution calling for a public hearing on Murch 14. 3. Motion to table [illy action. C. S'T'AFF RECOMMENDATION: As the project development plans are on schedule, staff recommends alternative H1. 1), SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the resolution for adoption. 31 Councilmember introduced the following resolution, the reading of which was dispensed with by unanimous consent, and moved its adoption: CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION, BY THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1, THE MODIFICATION OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NO. 1-1 THROUGH 1-15 AND THE ADOPTION OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-16, ALL LOCATED WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Public Hearing. This Council shall meet on March 14, 1994, at approximately 7:00 p.m., to hold a public hearing on the following matters: (a) the proposed modification, by increased project costs and enlarged geographic area, of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority's (the "Authority") Redevelopment Project No. 1; (b) the proposed modification, by increased project costs, of Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1-1 through 1-15, located within Redevelopment Project No. I; (c) the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-16, located within Redevelopment Project No. 1; (d) the proposed adoption of the Modified Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1; (e) the proposed adoption of the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1-1 through 1-15 (f) the proposed adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-16, all pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047, inclusive, as amended, and Sections 469.174 to 469.179, inclusive, as amended. Section 2. Notice of Hearing: Filing of Program. The City Administrator is authorized and directed to cause notice of hearing, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, to be given as required by law, to place a copy of the proposed Modified Redevelopment Plan, Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans and Tax Increment Financing Plan on file in the Adminstrator's office at City Hull and to make such copy available for inspection by the public no later than February 16, 1994. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted by the Council in and for the City of Monticello, Minnesota, on , 1994. Mayor ATTEST: Administrator is STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. CITY OF MONTICELLO ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Administrator of the City Council (the "Council') in and for the City of Monticello, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a meeting of the Council held on the date indicated with the original minutes thereof on file in my office and that the same is a full, true and correct transcript thereof insofar as said minutes relate to Resolution No. WITNESS my hand officially and the official seal of the Council this _ day of , 1994. City Administrator (SEAL) EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF MONTICELLO COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council (the "Council") in and for the City of Monticello, County of Wright, State of Minnesota, will hold a public hearing on March 14, 1994, at approximately 7:00 p.m., at City Hall, 250 East Broadway, Monticello, Minnesota, relating to the proposed modification, by increased project costs and enlarged geographic area, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority's Redevelopment Project No. 1 and the approval and adoption of the Modified Redevelopment Plan relating thereto; the proposed modification, by increased project costs, of the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1-1 through 1-15, located within Redevelopment Project No. 1; and the proposed adoption of Tax Increment Financing Plan relating to Tax Increment Financing Plan No. 1-16, also located within Redevelopment Project No. 1, all pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047, inclusive, as amended, and Sections 469.174 to 469.179, inclusive, as amended. A copy of the Modified Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1 and Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1-1 through 1-16, as proposed to be adopted at the office of the City Administrator at City Hall not later than February 16, 1994. The property comprising Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-16 is as follows: Lot 3, Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park PID Number: 155-018-003030 Further information regarding the identification of the parcel to be included in Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-16 may be obtained from the office of the City Administrator. Irv] All interested persons may appear at the hearing and present their views orally or in writing. Dated BY ORDER OF THE CTIY COUNCIL City Administrator MI) Council Agenda - 2/28/94 20. Consideration of approving application for gambling license renewal --Monticello Jaycees. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Monticello Jaycees currently operate three separate pull -tab operations in Monticello at the Silver Fox Inn, the Comfort Inn Treehouse Lounge, and Joyner Lanes. Their gambling licenses will expire on July 1, 1994, and they are requesting City Council approval to allow them to apply to the State Gambling Control Board for a two-year renewal of each license. As the Council has requested in the past, enclosed you will find a copy of the organization's revenues, expenditures, and donations that have occurred from their gambling operations during the past 1 1/2 years. The purpose of the financial report is to provide the Council with an idea of where the charitable donations are being made by any licenses that are located in the city of Monticello. 13. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: I. Accept the summary report as presented and adopt the resolutions approving the application for renewal of each of the three gambling licenses 1br the Monticello Jaycees. S n QD tD� 2. Do not adopt the resolutions approving the reissuance of the licenses. If this option is selected, the Jaycees will not he allowed to be Issued it license by the State and will have to cease operations July 1, 1994. C. S'T'AFF RECOMMENDATION: It has been the Council's past policy not to oppose tiny gambling license application renewal. The City stall' does not have any reason to recommend the renewal applications be denied. 1). SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of resolutions needed for adoption; Copy of renewal applications; Copy of financial summary report for the last 1 1/2 years' activities. 32 RESOLUTION 94 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF GAMBLING LICENSE WHEREAS, the Monticello Jaycees has submitted an application to the City Council of Monticello for the renewal of a charitable gambling license to conduct gambling at the Silver Fox Inn located in Monticello, Minnesota, and WHEREAS, upon review of the organization's activities, the Council is not opposed to the gambling licenses being reissued by the State Gambling Control Board, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL that the Monticello Jaycees' application for license renewal listed above is hereby approved, and the State Gambling Control Board is authorized to process the applications. Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of February, 1994. Mayor City Administrator 0 RESOLUTION 84 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF GAMBLING LICENSE WHEREAS, the Monticello Jaycees has submitted an application to the City Council of Monticello for the renewal of a charitable gambling license to conduct gambling at the Comfort Inn Treehouse Lounge located in Monticello, Minnesota, and WHEREAS, upon review of the organization's activities, the Council is not opposed to the gambling licenses being reissued by the State Gambling Control Board, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL that the Monticello Jaycees' application for license renewal listed above is hereby approved, and the State Gambling Control Board is authorized to process the applications. Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of February, 1994 Mayor City Administrator rol RESOLUTION 94- RESOLUTION 4 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF GAMBLING LICENSE WHEREAS, the Monticello Jaycees has submitted an application to the City Council of Monticello for the renewal of a charitable gambling license to conduct gambling at Joyner Lanes located in Monticello, Minnesota, and WHEREAS, upon review of the organization's activities, the Council is not opposed to the gambling licenses being reissued by the State Gambling Control Board, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL that the Monticello Jaycees' application for license renewal listed above is hereby approved, and the State Gambling Control Board is authorized to process the applications. Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of February, 1994. Mayor City Administrator C February 14, 1994 Mr. Rick Wolfsteller City of Monticello 250 East Broadway Monticello, MN 55362 RE: Monticello Jaycees - Charitable Gambling Relicensing Dear Mr. Wolfsteller: Our charitable gambling license will expire on June 30, 1994. We are now in the process of gathering the items required for submission to the State Gambling Control Board in order to obtain a license for another 2 -year term. We conduct charitable gambling at three locations, the Silver Fox, the Comfort Inn and Joyner Lanes/Lucky's Lounge. I am enclosing for your information a print-out of our income and expenses to date from our current licensing date of July 1, 1992. Further enclosed is an itemization of the $30,600.04 donated. We are very proud that we have been able to contribute these funds to our community. Because our three sites are located within the city limits, it is necessary for us to obtain your approval of our application. I therefore enclose three Premises Permit Renewal Applications, one for each location, which need to be signed by you and returned with a copy of the City Council's Resolution approving our application. Please submit these Premises Permit Renewal Application for approval at the next City Council meeting. It you desire further information regarding our operation or would like someone to be present at the City Council meeting, please contact me at 295-2107 days. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, u.�lerbing BarberaJ. J Monticello Jaycees P.O. Box 43 Monticello, MN 55362 rel STATE OF MINNESOTA GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD PREMISES PERMIT RENEWAL APPLICATION I— 14PPR PRINTED:01111/94 LICENSE NUMBER: B -026S9-001 EFFECTIVE DATE: 07/01/92 NAME OF ORGANIZATION: Jaycees Monticello NAME OF ESTABLISHMENT WHERE GAMBLING MILL SB CONDUCTED Siler Fox Ino $2X9*)AX*aXfA 1116 Cedar Street Monticello 53762 FOR BOARD USE ONLY ANT PAID CHECK NO. DATE EXPIRATION DATE: 06/70/94 COUNTY Wright IS THE PREMISES LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS?: T LESSOR INFORMATIOW DOES YOUR ORGANIZATION OWN THIS SITE?: No IF NO, LIST THE LESSOR: Onn ELauv 10920 32nd Ave N Plymouth 101 35441 NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER (WHEN NOT LESSOR): SQUARE FEET PER MONTH: 20 VIE FEET PER OCCASION: 0 AMOUNT PAID FOR RENT PER MONTH: 300 AMOUNT PAID PER OCCASION: 0 BINGO ACTIVITY BINGO IS CONDUCTED ON THIS PREMISES: No IF YES, REFER TO INSTRUCTIONS FOR REQUIRED ATTACHMENT STORAOE ADDRESS QOQ esee tawya Attic Mini -Storage 118 Oakwood Drive East Monticello IDI 55362 let National Bank Monticello 607 Pine St Monticello 101 55362 GAMBLING BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER: 7990 ON TBE LINES PROVIDED BELOW LIST THE NAME, ADDRESS AND TITLE OF AT LEAST TWO PERSONS AUTHORIZED TO SIGN CHECKS AND MAKE DEPOSITS AND WITHDRAWALS FOR THE GAMBLING ACCOUNT. THE ORGANIZATION'S TREASURER NAY NOT HANDLE GAMBLING FUNDS. Thomas J. Boon# 19801 Highway 25, Big Lame, NN 55309 Auditor/Huber Barbara J. Scherbing 8610 Darlington Avenue NE. Monticello, NN 55362 gambling Manager/Naber (BB FURS TO COMPLETE TIM REVERSE BIDS OF TRIS APPLICATION) THIS FORM WILL BE MADS AVAILABLE IN ALTERNATIVE FORMAT (I.E. LARGE PRINT, BRAILLE) UPON REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGMENT GAMBLING PREMISES AUTHORIZATION I HEREBY GIVE CONSENT TO LOCAL LAN ENFORCEMENT OFFICEI.S, THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD, OR AGENTS OF THE BOARD, OR THE COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OR PUBLIC SAFETY, OR AGENTS OF THE COMMISSIONERS, I NTER THE PREMISES TO ENFORCE THE LAW. BANE RECORDS INFORMATION THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD IS AUTHORIZEO TO INSPECT THE BANK RECORDS OF THE GAMBLING ACCOUNT WHENEVER NECESSARY TO FULFILL REQUIREMENTS OF CURRENT GAMBLING RULES AND STATUTES. I DECLARE TRATt • I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION AND ALL INFORMATION SUBMITTED TO THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD; • ALL INFORMATION IS TRUE, ACCURATE AND OOMPLETE;; ALL OTHER REQUIRED INFORMATION HAS BEEN FULLY DISCLOSED) • I AN THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE ORGANIZATION; • I ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FAIR AND LAWFUL OPERATION OF ALL GAMBLING ACTIVITIES TO BE CONDUCTED; • I WILL FAMILIARIZE MYSELF WITH THE LAWS OF MINNESOTA GOVERNING LAWFUL GANGLING AND RULES OF THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD AND AGREE, IF ISSUED A PREMISES PERMIT, TO ABIDE THOSE LAWS AND RULES, INCLUDING AMENDMENTS TO THIN; • ANY CHANGES IN APPLICATION INFORMATION WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD ANO LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT WITHIN TEN DAYS OF THE CHANGE; I UNDERSTAND THAT FAILURE TO PROVIDE REQUIRED INFORMATION OR PROVIDING FALSE OR MISLEADING INFORMATION MAY RESULT IN THE DENIAL OR REVOCATION OF THE PREMISES PERMIT. SIGNATURE OF CRIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Om LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT 7 THE CITY• MUST SIGN THIS APPLICATION IF THE GAMBLING PREMISES IS LOCATED WITHIN CITY LIMITS. I. THE COUNTY-- AND TOWNSHIP•• MUST SION THIS APPLICATION IF THE GAMBLING PREMISES IS LOCATED WITHIN A TOWNSHIP. I. FOR TOWNSHIPS THAT ARE UNORGANIZED OR UNINCORPORATED, THE COUNTY-- IS REQUIRED TO ATTACH A LETTER TO THIS APPLICATION INDICATING THE TOWNSHIPS STATUS. 4. THE LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT (CITY OR COUNTY) MUST PASS A RESOLUTION SPECIFICALLY APPROVING OR DENYING THIS APPLICATION. 5. A_COPY OF THE LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT'S B950LUTION APPROVING THIS APPLICATION MUST BE ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION. 6. IF THIS APPLICATION IS DENIED BY THE LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT, IT SHOULD NOT 8E SUBMITTED TO THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD. TOWNSHIPS BY SIGNATURE BELOW, THE TOWNSHIP ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE ORGANIIATION 18 APPLYING FOR A PREMISES PERMIT WITHIN TOWNSHIP LIMITS. CITY• OR COUNTY.. TONWBRIP" CITY OR COUNTY NAMEI TOWNSHIP NAME City of Monticello S NAT OF PERSON CEIV NO APPLICATION ( SIGNATURE OF PERSON RECEIVING APPLICATION TITLE (ftp/ G ��,N�rref7t�tr DATE RECEjVZD TITLE DATE RECRIVID �//S�9 f REFER TO M CMU3MIBT POR REQUIRXV ATTACH MRG MAIL TOt GRUELING CONTROL BOARD 1211 W COUNTY RD 5 - /UITR 300 I ROPIVILLB, MN 35112 STATE OF MINNESOTAPOR BOARD USE ONLY GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD AMT PAID PREMISES PERMIT RENEWAL APPLICATION CHECK NO. T "14PPR PRINTED:O1/11/94 DATE LICENSE NUMBER: S-02659-001 EFFECTIVE DATE: 07/01/93 EZPIRATION DATE: 06/30/96 NAME OF ORGANIZATION: Jaycees Monticello GAMELIMO PREMISES INFORMATION NAME OF ESTABLISHMENT WHERE GAMBLING WILL BE CONDUCTED Comfort Inn Treehouse Lou 200 E Oakwood Monticello 55362 COUNTY Wright IS THE PREMISES LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS?: T DOES YOUR ORGANIZATION OWN THIS SITE?: So IF NO, LIST THE LESSOR: Robert Sidsvold 210 Leighton Or Big Lake 101 55309 NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER (WHEN NOT LESSOR): SQUARE FEET PER MONTH: 15 AMOUNT PAID FOR RENT PER MONTH: 200 W FEET PER OCCASION: 0 AMOUNT PAID PER OCCASION: 0 BINGO ACTIVITY BINGO IS CONDUCTED ON THIS PREMISES: No IF YES, REFER TO INSTRUCTIONS FOR REQUIRED ATTACHMENT STORAGE ADDRESS M0VAKj =&LVa% Attic Mini -Storage 118 Oakwood Drive East Monticello NN 55362 BANK INFORMATION First National Bank Of Montice 407 Pine St Bos 239 Nlontecello NX 55362 GAMBLING BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER: 7990 ON THE LINES PROVIDED BEIA11 LIST THE NAME, ADDRESS AND TITLE OF AT LEAST TWO PERSONS AUTHORIZED TO SIGN CHECKS AND MAKE DEPOSITS AND WITHDRAWALS FOR THE GAMBLING ACCOUNT. THE ORGANIZATION'S TREASURER MAY NOT HANDLE GAMBLING FUNDS. Ihnnan I. Bnnnr. 19801 Highway 25, Big Lake, NN 55309 Auditor/Huber Barbara J. Scherb(ng 86D Darlington Avenue NE, Monticello, NN 55362 Gambling Manager/Naber (BB SURE TO C0A@LETS TSS REVERES BIOS OF THIS AUPPLICATION) THIS ►ORM WILL BE MADS AVAILABLE IN ALTERNATIVE FORMAT (I.S. LARGE PRINT, BRAILLE) UPON Ij'�QAyT A GAMBLING PREMISES AUTHORIZATION I HEREBY GIVE CONSENT TO LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS, THE GAMBLINC CONTROL BOARD, OR AGENTS OF THE BOARD, OR THE COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OR PUBLIC SAFETY, OR AGENTS OF THE COMMISSIONERS, I NTER THE PREMISES TO ENFORCE THE LAW. BANK RECORDS INFORMATION THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD IS AUTHORIZED TO INSPECT THE BANK RECORDS OF THE GAMBLING ACCOUNT WHENEVER NECESSARY TO FULFILL REQUIREMENTS OF CURRENT GAMBLING RULES AND STATUTES. DECLARE THATt I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION AND ALL INFORMATION SUBMITTED TO THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD; ALL INFORMATION IS TRUE, ACCURATE AND COMPLETE;; ALL OTHER REQUIRED INFORMATION HAS BEEN FULLY DISCLOSED; I AM THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE ORGANIZATION; I ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FAIR AND LAWFUL OPERATION OF ALL GAMBLING ACTIVITIES TO BE CONDUCTED; I WILL FAMILIARIZE MYSELF WITH THE LAWS OF MINNESOTA GOVERNING LAWFUL GAMBLING AND RULES OF THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD AND AGREE, IF ISSUED A PREMISES PERMIT, TO ABIDE THOSE LAWS AND RULES, INCLUDING AMENDMENTS TO THEM; ANY CHANGES IN APPLICATION INFORMATION WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD AND LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT WITHIN TEN DAYS OF THE CHANGE; I UNDERSTAND THAT FAILURE TO PROVIDE REQUIRED INFORMATION OR PROVIDING FALSE OR MISLEADING INFORMATION MAY RESULT IN THE DENIAL OR REVOCATION OF THE PREMISES PERMIT. SIGNATURE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT 1 THE CITY- MUST SIGN THIS APPLICATION IF THE GAMBLING PREMISES IS LOCATED WITHIN CITY LIMITS. Z. THE COUNTY" AND TOWNSHIP-• MUST SIGN THIS APPLICATION IF THE GAMBLING PREMISES IS LOCATED WITHIN A TOWNSHIP. 3. FOR TOWNSHIPS THAT ARE UNORGANIZED OR UNINCORPORATED, THE COUNTY" IS REQUIRED TO ATTACH A LETTER TO THIS APPLICATION INDICATING THE TOWNSHIPS STATUS. 4. THE LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT (CITY OR COUNTY) MUST PASS A RESOLUTION SPECIFICALLY APPROVING OR DENYING THIS APPLICATION. S. A COPY OF THE LOCAL UNIT OF G RWMENT'S RESOLUTION APPROVING THIS APPLICATION MUST BE ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION. 6. IF THIS APPLICATION IS DENIED BY THE LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT, IT SHOULD NOT BE SUBMITTED TO THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD. TOWNSHIPt BY SIGNATURE BELOW, THE TOWNSHIP ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE ORGANIZATION IS APPLYING FOR A PREMISES PERMIT WTTHTN TOWNSHIP LIMITS. CITY- OR COUNTY" TOMNSBIP.- CITY OR COUNTY NAMEI TOWNSHIP NAME City of Monticello SI NATO OF PERSON CEIVING APPLIC4710M I SIGNATURE OF PERSON RECNIVIMG APPLICATION TITB.�¢- �,// DATE RECEIVED TITLE DATE RNCNIVZD REFER TO TNN CMMMIST MN REQUIRED ATTACABIlB MAIL TOt GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD 1711 M COUNT RD B - SUITE 300 S ROSEVILML, la 95113 'O^ STATE OF MZNNESOTA►OR BOARD USB ONLYI GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD AMT PAID PREM19d3 YERMIT RENEWAL APPLICATION CHECK NO. I-^14PPR PRINTEDt01/11/94 DATE LICENSE NUMBER: 8-03659-006 EFFECTIVE DATEt 07/01/91 EZPIRATION DAT3: 06/30/96 NAME OF ORGANIZATION: Jaycees Monticello GAMBLING PREMISES IRMPHATIOM NAME OF ESTABLISHMENT WHERE GAMBLING WILL BE CONDUCTED Joyner Lane z84X=dX8Mgz0a P.O. Bo. 246 Monticello 55363 COUNTY WRIOBT IS THE PREMISES LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS?: Y DOES YOUR ORGANIZATION OWN THIS SITE?: Mo IF NO, LIST THE LESSOR: Al Joyner Bos 668 Osseo MRM 55363 NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER (WHEN NOT LESSOR): SQUARE FEET PER MONTHS 13 ARE FEET PER OCCAtSIONt 0 AMOUNT PAID FOR RENT PER MONTH: 300 AMOUNT PAID PER OCCASIONt 0 BINGO ACTIVITY BINGO IS CONDUCTED ON THIS PREMISES: MO IF YES, REFER TO INSTRUCTIONS FOR REQUIRED ATTACHMENT MRAGA ADDRESS 606 s"L31b6M:" Attic Mini -Storage IIB Oakwood Drive East Monticello MOM 55363 First Notional Bank 607 Pias St Bos 339 Monticello MIM 95363 GAMBLING BAIAI ACCOUNT NUMBER: 7990 ON TBE LINES PROVIDED BELOW LIST THE NAME, ADDRESS AND TITLE OF AT LEAST TWO PERSONS AUTHORIZED TO SIGN CHECKS AND MARE DEPOSITS AND WITHDRAWALS FOR THE GAMBLING ACCOUNT. THE ORGANIZATION'S TREASURER MAY NOT HANDLE GAMBLING FUNDS. Ihoaas J. Boone 19801 Highway 25, Big take. MB 55309 Auditor/Member Barbara J. Scherbing 8610 Darlington Avenue NE, Monticello, MN 55362 Gambling Manager/Huber In MAIAB TO COMPLETE THIS REVERSE BIDE OF THIS APPLICATION) THIS FORK WILL BB MADE AVAILABLE IN ALTERNATIVE FORMAT (I.E. LARGE PRINT, BRAILLE) UPON REQUEST 0 ACKK GAMBLING PREMISES AUTHORISATION I HEREBY GIVE CONSENT TO LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS, THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD, OR AGENTS OF THE BOARD, OR THE COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OR PUBLIC SAFETY, OR AGENTS OF THE COMMISSIONERS, 1 NTER THE PREMISES TO ENFORCE THE LAM. BANK RECORDS INFORMATION THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD IS AUTHORIZED TO INSPECT THE BANK RECORDS OF THE GAMBLING ACCOUNT WHENEVER NECESSARY TO FULFILL REQUIREMENTS OF CURRENT GAMBLING RULES AND STATUTES. I DECLARE TBATi • I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION AND ALL INFORMATION SUBMITTED TO THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD; • ALL INFORMATION IS TRUE, ACCURATE AND COMPLETE;; • ALL OTHER REQUIRED INFORMATION HAS BEEN FULLY DISCLOSED; • I AM THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE ORGANIZATION; • I ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FAIR AND LAWFUL OPERATION OF ALL GAMBLING ACTIVITIES TO BE CONDUCTED; • I WILL FAMILIARIZE MYSELF WITH THE LAMS OF MINNESOTA GOVERNING LAWFUL GAMBLING AND RULES OF THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD AND AGREE, IF ISSUED A PREMISES PERMIT, TO ABIDE THOSE LAWS AND RULES, INCLUDING AMENDMENTS TO THEM; • ANY CHANGES IN APPLICATION INFORMATION WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD AND LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT WITHIN TEN DAYS OF THE CHANGE; I UNDERSTAND THAT FAILURE TO PROVIDE REQUIRED INFORMATION OR PROVIDING FALSE OR MISLEADING INFORMATION MAY RESULT IN THE DENIAL OR REVOCATION OF THE PREMISES PERMIT. SIGNATURE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER LOCAL GOVBAIOCINT ACKKOWJMGWEHT I THE CITY- MUST SIGN THIS APPLICATION IF THE GAMBLING PREMISES IS LOCATED WITHIN CITY LIMITS. 2. THE COUNTY-- AND TOWNSHIP-- MUST SIGN THIS APPLICATION IF THE GAMBLING PREMISES IS LOCATED WITHIN A TOWNSHIP. J. FOR TOWNSHIPS THAT AM UNORGANIZED OR UNINCORPORATED, THE COUNTY-- IS REQUIRED TO ATTACH A LETTER TO THIS APPLICATION INDICATING THE TOWNSHIPS STATUS. d. THE LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT (CITY OR COUNTY) MUST PASS A RESOLUTION SPECIFICALLY APPROVING OR DENYING THIS APPLICATION. S. A COPY OF THE LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESOLUTION APPROVING THIS APPLICATION MUST BE ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION. 6. IF THIS APPLICATION IS DENIED BY THE LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT, IT SHOULD NOT BE SUBMITTED TO THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD. TOWNSHIP; BY SIGNATURE BELOW, THE TOWNSHIP ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE ORGANISATION IS APPLYING FOR A PREMISES PERMIT WITHIN TOWNSHIP LIMITS. CITY- OR COUNTF•- TON"HIP•- CITY OR COUNTY NAME TOWNSHIP NAME City of Monticello BIONA;tlt@PF.PER�0;1 1�R9HI PLICl BIGNATUAE OF PERSON RECEIVING APPLICATION l�/}aGa.rL I/iii((('/////[/f/7/ iS1� TITL DATE RECEIVED TITLE DATE RECEIVED ''�L 0 REFER TG TEE CHECKLIST FOR REQDIRED ATMC810a1b MAIL TOi GAMLING CONTROL BOARD 1711 M COUSTT RD B - SOITN 700 S RoasvlLu, NR 53113 O 7990 2/12/94 Monticello Jaycees 7/1/92 - 1/31/94 7/ 1/92 Through 1/31/94 Category Description ---------------------- INFLOWS Interest Profit: Comfort Fox Joyners Rod 6 Gun Club Total Profit TOTAL INFLOWS OUTFLOWS llc Tax 730 tax 990 tax Accountant Bank: Comfort Fox Rod 6 Gun Club Total Bank Bank Charge Bond Donation Equipment Licensing Payroll: Boone CHowe Deluge EDaluge Fouquette Hoffarth Howe Major Moshier Scherbing Payroll - Other Total Payroll Postage Rent: Comfort Fox Joyners Rent - Other Total Rent State Tax Page 1 7/ 1/92- 1/31/94 331.76 25,190.00 28,067.50 51,014.00 686.00 ----------- 104,957.50 ------------ 105,289.26 50.00 1,489.58 3,228.26 4,265.00 -500.00 900.00 0.00 ----------- 400.00 95.72 100.00 30,600.04 244.31 100.00 1,436.01 33.47 3,310.04 1,988.Rl 323.21 1,653.04 3,550.19 1,285.97 253.96 4,293.89 4,751.25 ------------ 22,880.84 145.00 3,800.00 5,700.00 3,800.00 1,780.00 15,080.00 .O 41.63 fr in7.Z4 7990 2/12/94 Monticello Jaycees 7/1/92 - 1/31/94 7/ 1/92 Through 1/31/94 7/ 1/92 - Category Description 1/31/94 ---------------------- ------------------------ Tabs: Cost 11,032.04 Tax 13,936.46 ------------ Total Tabs 24,968.50 ------------ TOTAL OUTFLOWS 103,996 12 OVERALL TOTAL 1,293.14 OOOOOOOOotC0 Page 2 Monticello Jaycees 7/1/92 - 1/31/94 7/ 1/92 Through 1/31/94 7990 Page 1 2/12/94 Date Num Payee Memo Category Cir Amount -------- ------ ----------------------------------------------- - ---------- INCOME/EXPENSE EXPENSES Donation 7/ 6/92 1196 Monticello Help Ce Donation X 7/ 6/92 1197 Monticello Times Dance on the Donation X 7/ 6/92 1198 Tom Perrault Senior Bingo Donation X 7/ 6/92 1199 Miss Monticello Co Sponsorship Donation X 7/ 6/92 1200 Peaceful Heart Qui Supplies Donation X 7/ 6/92 1201 Karen Kitchen Summer Camp Donation X 8/ 3/92 1215 Monticello Help Ce Donation X 8/ 3/92 1218 Jessie Hoffarth Rent - Homele Donation X B/ 3/92 1219 Tom Perrault Senior Bingo Donation X 8/ 3/92 1220 MN Jaycees Charita Building Donation X 9/14/92 1236 Monticello Times Punt, Pass & Donation X 9/14/92 1238 Monticello Jaycees Punt, Pass & Donation X 9/14/92 1239 Tom Perrault Senior Bingo Donation X 9/14/92 1240 Kathy Weiss Punt, Pass & Donation X 1/15/92 Deposit Sandbox Fill Donation X 9/29/92 1242 Sue Krantz, Chair Bike -a -Thou Donation X 10/ 5/92 1253 Monticello Help Ce Donation X 10/ 5/92 1254 Maus Foods Punt, Pass & Donation X 10/ 5/92 1255 Monticello Times Punt, Pass & Donation X 10/ 5/92 1259 Tom Perrault Senior Bingo Donation X 11/ 2/92 1275 Monticello Times Cystic 11.60/ Donation X 11/ 2/92 1276 Barb Scherbing, Co Halloween Donation X 11/ 2/92 1277 Tom Perrault Senior Bingo Donation X 11/ 2/92 1278 Toys for Tots Toys Donation X 11/13/92 1283 Monticello Communi St. Jude's Bi Donation X 11/23/92 1287 Barb Scherbing Halloween Can Donation X 12/ 6/92 1302 Bill Jones Santa for Sin Donation X 12/ 6/92 1303 Tom Boll DJ for Sing f Donation X 12/ 7/92 1299 Maus Foods Thanksgiving Donation X 12/ 7/92 1300 Monticello Times Sing with San Donation X 12/ 7/92 1304 Tom Perrault Senior Bingo Donation X 12/ 7/92 1305 Marlene McGuire Guatemala Tri Donation X 12/ 7/92 1306 Pam Steffes Hardship Donation X 12/ 7/92 1307 Patty Olson, Chair Food for Sing Donation X 12/ 9/92 1309 Barb Scherbing Fruit Basket Donation X 12/17/92 Deposit Reimburse Ad Donation X 12/18/92 1313 Monticello Communt Sing With San Donation X 1/ 4/93 1331 Monticello Times Sing with San Donation X 1/ 4/93 1332 Monticello Food Sh Donation X t/ 4/93 1333 Sober Cab Donation X 1/ 4/93 1334 Tom Perrault Senior Bingo Donation X 1/ 4/93 1335 Joyner Lanes Bowling Leagu Donation X 1/ 4/93 1336 Close Up Donation X t/ 4/93 1337 Land Of Lakes Girl Donation X 1/ 4/93 1338 Pack 270 Girl Scou Donation X 2/ 1/93 1355 Missing Children M Donation X 2/ 1/93 1356 Tom Perrault, Chat Senior Bingo Donation X e • i Monticello Jaycees 7/1/92 - 1/31/94 7/ 1/92 Through 1/31/94 7990 Page 2 2/12/94 Date Num Payee Memo Category Clr - ---------- Amount -------- 2/ 1/93 ------ 1337 ------------------ Joyner Lanes ------------- Teen Bowling ---------------- Donation X -304.00 2/ 1/93 1358 Monticello Chemica PIP Feat Donation X -1,200.00 2/19/93 1362 Little Mountain F1 Nursing Home Donation X -319.30 2/24/93 Deposit Reimbursement Donation X 48.00 3/ 2/93 1373 Tom Perrault Senior Bingo Donation X -10.00 3/ 2/93 1376 Monticello Communi Donation X -500.00 3/ 2/93 1377 Monticello Graduat Donation X -500.00 3/ 2/93 1378 Monticello Food Sh Donation X -500.00 3/16/93 1384 Bill Howe, Chair Easter Egg Hu Donation X -500.00 3/26/93 Deposit Reimburse Sin Donation X 34.80 4/ 3/93 1402 Tom Perrault Chair Senior Bingo Donation X -15.00 4/ 5/93 1403 Community Toys for Admin. Expens Donation X -300.00 4/ 3/93 1404 Bill Howe, Chair Easter Egg Hu Donation X -100.00 4/ 3/93 1405 Terry Dehmer Self -Defense Donation X -600.00 4/19/93 1411 Dawn Daluge Bike Safety Donation X -500.00 4/27/93 1412 School Patrol Prog School Patrol Donation X -730.00 5/ 3/93 1429 Tom Perrault, Chai Senior Bingo Donation X -10.00 5/ 3/93 1430 Northern Ireland P Donation X -100.00 5/ 3/93 1431 Monticello Girls F Donation X -200.00 / 3/93 1432 Senior Citizens Ce Donation X -200.00 5/17/93 1437 Viking Council Sponsorship o Donation X -27.00 5/17/93 1438 Terry Dehmer Self -Defense Donation X -200.00 5/17/93 Void Check 01405 Self -Defense Donation X 600.00 6/ 7/93 1430 Monticello Scholar Donation X -1,000.00 6/ 7/93 1451 Tom Perrault, Chai Senior Bingo Donation X -10.00 6/ 7/93 1452 Jessie Haas Expert Karate Donation X -200.00 6/ 7/93 1433 MN Jaycees Charita Donation X -100.00 6/ 7/93 1434 Special Olympics M Donation X -500.00 6/ 7/93 1435 MN Future Leaders Donation X -300.00 6/ 7/93 1456 VOID MN Teen Leede Donation X 0.00 6/11/93 Deposit Reimburse Eas Donation X 30.29 7/ 5/93 1470 Friends Dance on the Donation X -500.00 7/ 5/93 1473 Miss Monticello Pa Donation X -150.00 7/ 5/93 1474 Tom Perrault Senior Bingo Donation X -10.00 7/ 6/93 Deposit Reimburse Bik Donation X 253.00 7/ 6/93 Deposit Reimburse Bik Donation X 75.37 8/ 2/93 1490 K -Mart Dance on the Donation X -76.47 8/ 2/93 1493 Tom Perrault Senior Bingo Donation X -10.00 8/ 2/93 1494 Nyanne Angell Ramp for Hand Donation X -600.00 8/ 2/93 1495 KIDS House Teen House Im Donation X -500.00 B/ 2/93 1496 Little Mountain FI Miss Monticel Donation X -18.64 9/13/93 1515 Big Lake-Monticell CPR Class Donation X -11500.00 9/13/93 1521 Tom Perrault Senior Bingo Donation X -10.00 10/ 4/93 1539 Monticello High Sc Winter Guard Donation X -430.00 / 4/93 1540 West Cello Apt. Donation X -443.00 4/93 1341 Tom Perrault Senior Bingo Donation X -10.00 10/18/93 1545 K -Mart Punt, Pass 6 Donation X -78.76 11/ 1/93 1338 Tom Perrault Senior Bingo Donation X -10.00 11/ 1/93 1359 Toys for Tots Donation X -1,500.00 11/10/93 1561 Chemical Health 6 PipFest Donation X -21000.01 11/15/93 1365 K -Mart Halloween Par Donation X -106.2Q 12/ 6/93 1378 Tom Perrault Senior Bingo Donation X -30.0 Monticello Jaycees 7/1/92 - 1/31/94 7/ 1/92 Through 1/31/94 7990 Page 3 2/12/94 Date Num Payee Memo Category Clr Amount -------- 12/ 6/93 ------ 1579 ------------------ Marlene McGuire ------------- Guatemala Tri ---------------- Donation - X ---------- -1,500.00 12/ 6/93 1580 Minneapolis YABA Youth Bowlers Donation X -600.00 12/ 6/93 1581 Monticello Foodshe Donation X -250.00 12/ 6/93 1583 Maus Foods Thanksgiving Donation X -80.44 12/ 6/93 1584 Monticello Communi Punk, Pass 6 Donation X -54.91 12/14/93 1588 Monticello Chemica Donation X -500.00 1/ 3/94 1602 Tom Perrault Punt, Pass 6 Donation X -7.24 1/ 3/94 1603 Tom Perrault Senior Bingo Donation X -10.00 1/ 3/94 1604 ECFE Donation X -750.00 l/ 3/94 1605 VOID Monticello Co Donation X 0.00 1/11/94 1607 Pioneer Taxi SoberCab Donation X -24.51 1/11/94 1608 Maus Foods Senior Bingo Donation X -31.32 1/29/94 1616 Missing Children M Donation -350.00 Total Donation -30,600.04 TOTAL EXPENSES -30,600.04 TOTAL INCOME/EXPENSE -30,600.04 0 ¢:RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 01/27/04 16:14:1,2 11 RA14T DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 36200 01/26/94 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFIC 36200 01/26'/94 HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFIC 36201 01/26/94 D & K REFUSE RECYCLI 36202 01/26/94 MOBIL 36203 01/26/94 FRONTLINE PLUS FIRE 36203 01,/26/94 FRONTLINE PLUS FIRE 36203 01/26/04 FRONTLINE PLUS FIRE 36203 01/26/94 PkONTLINE PLUS FIR£ 36204 01/26/96 PLUMSERY-PURCELL'S P 36305 01/26/94 U.S. P03TMASIER 36200 01/x6/96 MCGuWALL COMPANY 36'1.07 01/26/84 MN. DEPT OF PUZLIC ° /1_ j?08 01/20/04 MN OE'PART OF NATURAL 38200 01/26/94 ASSOCIATED VETERINAR 36210 01/20/94 CITY OF ELK RIVER Jb?11 01/16/34 DYNAMIC MANAAEMENY S 2b31? 01/26/94 0 8 K REFUSE kECVCLI 36?13 01/28/04 MN U.C. FUND 36?14 01/20/96 KOROPCHAK/OLIVE 4fi215 01/30/34 U.S. POli'rMASTER 36215 01/2G/D4 U.S. PO&'tM.ASTER 6r,,NERAL CfaN,(°NIMi 1, Disbursement Journal OESCRIPTIO•J AMOUNT CLAU 85 *FY* 8.75 85 GAS/FIRE DEPT 73.52 82.37 611 +'F V• 0?8.15 131 *FY* 6'8.50 510 *FY'* 1,111.21 510 'FY* 2,032.42 51.0 'FYi 77.24 510 1MiSC SUPPLIES/FIRE DEP 52.93 3-.873.00 251 FURNACE IREP/KRAMER REN 60..00 210 BOX RENTAL/FIRE DEPT 7.25 111 ''FV` 037.55 535 HANDICAP PERMIT PEI -SID 5.00 118 SNVM/ATV/WA'ER REG 852.00 683 Aa+I!:AL SUPPLIES 72.07 784 ROAD OEALANT/STREET 5.219.56 ' 712 94 COMPUTER NTC/SlOY V 630.00 611 RECYCLING CONTRACT 2,389..05 130 "FY• 130.49 87 TRAVEL EXPANSE 56.39 310 SEWER/WATER MAILING 129.08 210 SCWF.k/WATER MAILING 120.01 258.15 TOTAL 15.490.83 *Cf1f,G •CHEC 'CHF>' ` BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 02/03f94 13:41:30 „•ARRA.t:T GATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING '.H?77 M,03/94 GRID%jP Ch'+91P.UCT10•t, :6?78 02/03/04 BROWN R CRIS. It.i . 96279 00/03/94 trta DE.PARi OF NA?UP.AL 36?80 02/03/04 NORTHWEST MINNESOTA 36281 02/07/94 ARA CORY REFRESHMENT 36282 02/07/04 BEN FRAta•KLI'M 30282 02/07/04 BEN FRANKLIN 3N282 02/07/94 BEN FRANKLItI 36483 01/07/94 DYNA SYSTEMS 36784 02/07/94 GOULD BROS. CHEV-DLG .16285 01/0,7/04 (iOVF.PN FINANCE OPTIC 16206 02/01/96 GOVERNMENT )RA.INTtIG 16137 0?/07/n4 HAPPY'S AJrO SUPP:Y 3i,00ti 41/07/94 NCraRV 8 AS50CIA.IES 362;`0 02/01/'94 HERME9/JERRY +ifi913 02/07/94 1,0('.LUND BUS CGICIIANY '.6?O1 02107/OA J 'm OIL comppMY 3 6'10 1 0?/fi7/94 .1 11F 0% (,01'.'JANV ifi2S17 0`10?/n4 r.: REr:RFATION 8 PALK j(i?9J 01/07/'14 ANT.MA.1, (;P1 9ft9C4 01?07/04 11012 i 1.f E!. Q1 PAYER 6 5 !11205 02/01/j4 5at3rt.t+ Ct 36>06 0?/07 / 14 NAI IONAI 3U'_H I11f1 VAR i6?9h 01/01/94 NAMNAL FJII;'l1INd PAR J696 0197/96 NA110t:AI rU•HIN:, f•AR 6;-1!. 9 401 /9b NA i INIAL 61P H (NG i+AP ';'j 02 16 11 1,4 NAS It -NAL Ii PAR Ili?•lf• 11_!/ 11/+lb HAfI1•nAl Mtll•,;.glr:fi PA'e Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CI 795 DIGESTOR COVER REP 8.3.026.20 861 SCHOOL ALVD/C HILL 34,197.91 118 WATER/SNOW/ATV REG 604.00 136 REG FEE/GARY ANDERSON 10.00 408 CI:Y HALL SUPPLIES 84.00 20 SUPPLIES/PW INSPECTIONS 11.29 20 SUPPLIES/M.ONT FORD STRM ?.08 20 9UPPLTE:S/CHL')RINATOR 2.07 12.44 p•CI 50 SHOP SUPPLIES 189.92 70 MTC OF VEHICLE/EIRE. 0 116.67 71 MEMBERSHIP DUES/FXNANC 1540 7? REG FEE./GAP%% ANDERS04 ?5.00 7B EQUIP REPAT2 PARTS 47.148 546 WATER 1)1IL17V MIC SUP 74.29 81 LIFIRARV CLEANINA CONT 4?.7.50 8? VEH RF,PAI4. PAI`WSTRE 213.12 95 OIL/STPEETS A2.6.63 9S AIL/FEPF OF.?T ?3.?7 4110.70 •'�t 610 N.riN3rRGHYP OUCS/PARKS 100.00 "Ib AN IM4L ct'+n 7A(71. t�er7l t , 100.00 ' "I?4 (711Y HA!1 :>UP►'L1ES ?7.10 130 10NPRAt`T PAYMFNf 2.03.'3 iba •FVI ':'.()3 164 01LP.;i•FF.) 10.40 16.1 Vft, fcEP PARY%fWA."6' DEQ 3.?2 164 F001V t:rP PARi',P,iuFF 116.')5 146 VEN t..rf '01.14 144 Vt•.1', 5!�dP1 tr ./rS7G L'FV1 3.U4 364 .90 ■• E.RC 9INANCIAL SYSTEM 03/03/94 13:41:36 C ;PR.kuT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECXTri6 36297 02/07/94 O'NETLL/JEFF 36287 02/07/94 O'NEILL/JEFF 36298 02/07/94 PITNEY BOWS 36798 02/07/84 PLUMBERY-PURCELL'S P 3b300 0?/07 t9ts PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 30301 02/07/94 RIVERSIDE OIL 35307 09/07/94 ROYAL TIRE OF +tt7NTIC 36:03 02/07/94 S-v•:{'FUM !:UPPLM CO. 36303 02/07/94 Si"ECTRUM SUPPLY CO. 3630h 02/07/34 STAR TPIfSIj1+E o3U5 02/07/94 ',:.'!OiHY SAVrR i! 30q 01/07/94 It .3. ALI OY4 36307 02/07/94 VIkING COCA 4OLA 3G308 0:3/'07/94 WRIGHT-H£NNFPIN COVO 0:NERAL CHECKING IN Disbursement Journwl DESCRIPTION APPOUNT CI 1G1 MILEAGE EXPENSE 81.?0 IV M•ISC EXPENSE/PLAN & 2O0 9.07 89.27 160 POSTAGE MACHINE MTC AG 82.00 251 WARMING HOUSE REPAIRS 39.00 175 WWTP CON'TPACTY PYM 30.421.58 496 GAS/STREET DEPT 809.75 ?27 TIRE P.EPALR/STREETS 30.00 490 CWTHINOW REETS DEPS 07.10 499 M3`:G PARK F'I1PP#.EES 59.11 1?5.21 197 NiWSPAPEF SU30CPIQTI00 39.00 .00326 r4EK MAIL. BOXISTREET OE 19.flfi 606 MIOC SUPPLIES/WATERT DE 27.31 7 78 POP/PA•kid; i ONLESSION05 72.00 S12 UTILITIES 9.00 TOTAL 156.116.02 •C1 •r, DRC FIIIAKIAL SYSTEM ul/07/94 11:51:14 k2ANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 5300 BRIOt,EWATER I E1.EPHON z631D9 03/08/94 BR IOCEWA f@P. I►'LEY:44A 9,)?913. 02/08/ 4 6RIOC+FWAiSR ThLt'-"iiRJ aS`-59 04/06/94 BRIC•CEWAT4R TF:er-FIC'N 10630 0^/05/i4 BP'VK'-WA'?A IELV)HON 3:3109 (2/08/94 SR10r'i_WAr�a TELEF:.'N A51)C-• 11"fapIa4 8R?r1rFWA":_P 'E_EMoll 'f3!J9 0?/01?/04 9=!_"-tt+AT:R IFLEPr'i111 :63•:9 0110F14" SPIDO`•EWk, EK ' E E, .;JN 3%+'•57 02/09/94 r'•&.IDt'rHAf-;K reLEF:.r.N 2--210 ??/69/96 C04' 'IT '0 CVA: r "n 0?/08/94 COAT If/ '.OAST ?'0 0?1/03/!)4 CnAST i0 CnASf 3 W 11" 0'!/08/°4 CUA,T 10 JA'37 ?G310 0?/01J/94 il)AS i YO COAST 35=1U U?IOPM4 CC/A51 T cz ''C'AST '!:310 01/00/04 CC:AST f0 COA0 ?!5310 U?/08/()4 CUA:I I COAoT ?b±10 0''./03/94 COA;f 1`0 COAST C �.+ 1 1 02/00/!)4 (all, I. i'••nN 63'? 0)./08/06 MAN'S ' -U: h CCtr f k •'r';' 4 C?./911/g4 %.0v-4 3r1 F yr/ANz'F l): N rr. 16 it)i)tG ;I?/0(I/�fh :feN Ar?:!i.c;;e!t/ iR,a'YtN '1A �:,/.yn.!•!! !.L.,.I:e.y .IMG!"F" 11 :/;-;10 ;J. 1 7 AI A 1., :;J 'r 11!/t)W _4 MIR -W I A. • i I 'e 6135 lJ'1' A' I' ! Oier urselfient •.ourna l DE5Ck7PT10•[ AMOUNT ± 24 TELF PKICNE f_HARGE1, 79.06 24 fELEPHDNE CHARGES SO.95 66 TEL I9110NE CHAPGF—S 198. 60 ?4 fELEPHONE CFARGEe 45.60 24 TELE PSONE rHAPI:,ES 136.19 24 f_LcFMM CHARGES 44.39 *6 _EL E9-t/5NE CHAPAEF. 30.75 ?4 TELEPHOr1E CHARLES 50.?7 ?4 *Vg�EPr.DNE HAPCE4 33•.'52 24 TV %PHCWE C'HARI-r'; E71 . 144 35 ml ;C :•L'vP!.1ES/ STRt fS 1.06 35 r+15C SUPP! IE; I r'Sf--JSPEC B.'10 2s aTC 0;. °rN104 Car F_'I-n :,U.97 35 NISC REPAIF./KRA'!-F RENT 4.?! 35 CLr.pNING SUPPLIaS/LIB ?Y.84 35 MTC OF SHOP/GAP E.LO 5.136 35 MIST 51IPPIJES/WATER 3G.47 35 MASC F1RF UE'�T SC?PLIf. t4.00 Q 35 dATER UTILCTY a+rc s,.ip 2SS.03 36!9.8? "IS3 PENTAI. CP(-AdAfF!? :;'•''ir1 ?,".t1!•, i!:r, HIEC SUPG!,;EWVATEk 4•£.50 ' 71 Mr!t3r.1( tiIV UUI:54A:!fY 15.00 01 LIE', ARY I:.LEA'4I':6 %;0r.1 ? 7.5v' ti91 tHIN L CIAJ Q-1 ,l Lt 2V IC 11 ^ .413 68(; ASST• VAN.' fJ)UI;141,1 P'NI.I.Ui 09 /I:ptr'I'E4 ✓Af1-R!I'TrY 'v "?'),04 A Ph i s i '11 .; A' '-), ' N' :1 .0[. 1 1115, oil, I�• 1"•;.ta 7% 'tell Y I ,. ,� 03107! JI `i:51:14 Aa"..F. a, r.Y :rA�E VE.ra5t1R iiENERAL rA+ECKING + 320 0?/Or1a4 r•Ir.NEOA G'O 0-11/06M& NN STA) E 'IR•EASUPER 38121 OVn0/94 MN STATE (REASOU'R ?63?2 02/08104 MONTICLLLLI ANIMAL CO 36323 0?/08/N4 NONTSCELLO PRINTING ?i? s? 0�/02/!1G Mniu PIf l: l.lh Mk INTIN(i :'b3_�3 Ol/08/94 149M IGELLO PPINTING 363'?3 0 c/U8/!4 MONTICELLO OROJINA s5b? 02/08/84 MK14111ALA PRINTS140 (.i?h 0?IOC/94 NrIw17CE1.Lr1-C1Y• LAO (5•< t1�/0,9/94 'A%,F I IMI 00/03/44 7ANF .LrJ.t C^1091 r. is 64(,r Lir.' '1ya?� 0?/D•I)/'.h i1 141; 1 It,% •L. ��?O1'rI `A'k .D'. Di9">> .1?/N,)/r}4 PAf•,F '.7N11 T'169194 PAGE LZt_t i,:;•r'Ib -19(;/x4 yr;¢I1::5 •. LEANT:: S ?03 ?.0 ri:?1(13/04 PP`-'IvS:r.'F C1,FJ1KMi; 1G?`r'/ 09/(1U/94 S(.AP:pr:R 1:Llr<I.11, 1J.A 9ri3�'7 OP/00/94 SLANNSF,• WICYII'. USA •43'*U 1j,1(1f.104 SEN:EV ';YOTrMr, ;(W., 9GtJ' Pi r : VIC r. •1' 6P/QR/1)4 UNI)OC RWA.L 51. SVIL : aA W)I(d/9h ,!W i(11' ;MN VZr J1/�+.J/Ih L'iri.).•• n�tJ'e., ;&VRA tOO/36 T'l10 Al ''FI Vr, ;11/,1 I I.1x1 'I'S! T'* NY A' i, "V':( !U ,/!1'_I',h 11:00 ,N•, ,.'4'. .,"I'y7r 16 Di sOmursemc lnt doer eta I OE6CFTo'1Qr4 AN[-UtJ*e 772 UTILIII6S S.1814. 13 4...9 4.4 . '3 4 363 50014/1tAT0;' 001 5.00 264 3OUTS/FIRt DEPT 1S.Ro 20.00 1-8b ANOIAO- C3Ni1LOL CONT 1.100.00 137 FINANCE VEC'IFIED ACCTS W.0:) 137 F_!RE r'I:(r'r ACCIC' PT Q P 137 Pl'::t.lEO C'AP.OS/T bOU 411.59 137 FXCAVATIGN 4ERM.IT f0".. ':0.00 137 OCAVA'i1011 PEvrgIT FtiJRM ?0.110 2,?.63 401 F15yY A I p CL44SIAWAIP 7112 FeLt61?OPre C!+.APGE*- 42.(\0 IQ3 rC1.r'}, ONE CMA;;�ZE'+ 21.30 10 T11.t'E LhAs(iEi� 94.'111 ZNi 'r 1., F.P;AdNF 0kA4CE` '1.10 i01V T1: Ll 5: urJE CHAki;C43 'ii.3;i •C? ,ELFP—;7+aE C►A,>rN. , 0\.?.1 70? r,'Lh;-'-SNE L.1A4RES .:!rl 703 -ZL rL:irrJE CHARC45 21 no 194..'.1x1 ?',Re iiALI, CLI'.ANI41i CON "10.00 1711 ( TTY tJALL. CLWANTNG Cil 000.00 490.00 ni)I •F V 800.16 CID If V" OO. IL D07.E11 1x10: A -ARM M.Sr AOFMI/CIRE 176.(10 1411 IF V'• h.Oi1 211 •F V• r,r:; , Vr PFr: eAi. r. `1 a 6,P( FINANC.AL SYS,fte 04/0'7/R11 17:51:14 .'RANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL tAECKMG 363i0 03/0P/94 IMOCAL ?b3'ft 02008/54 VA9!YO 51135I.SM gff,:OVA, .N0'1 03/00/94 VAS.IO liUEMISIH RiMOVA fiV08/96 WAJU-� al"1a r ECJIab n- n8/91. vr;•*Kl r.n.as,� all, l5r) yF333 n::i�9/e11 W97f-HT fXT107Y A,-ITl 3ia3:4 04/03/411 Y.;M..C.A. Lli NjL;:dAYv C.et+E kA: ChEi:I:I.`• Ulsovrsc+ment Jow nn DFSCP.IPTIou AMOUNT 233.81 113 'FY• 4.+18 524 GARBAGE COuTRACT S.400.�§i 534 SALTS FAR/(.AGSAAE CON 544.05 9.004.112 369 YTi. J� £!1In/A•t5l �:�1 5.904.211 RAC1 '^3.3')7.' o ?1F nLYW :r.rticI U -NG iib �tCttPklY CGN/w:i ?YnT 93.S..n c.iiA, G-.408.71 a ;.:i.', f7•A400Al SYSIEM 1?/ MAP 11:08:40 kt.• 4rto JA*b VErdOa& GENESrt•1. '_AEC1(tNG q 4 i/ 101.14 6;Q -WN 6 CR= Ii•. FNC. C< 0-x71,0/94 E:=-pbN 4 C`?Ia. INC'. J'•;1; G'A)II1194 t,Rt:WN r: C+I9. 1N:. i U:/tIt 6POW14 .. '..1'u. :•:i. 3e'Y1 C1,/10/!4 (',CAFMEK 11Cpt_:1. VA ?n. ,•I 2!/17.04 SCYff.i:Y > •JiLG. UJA Sdl!U/p4 WAt.GCM• P`Jt`�P V L•,•IiPN. 0'1/10/94 WAt1N.1rt r7l'M? la Fnuippl 3;:35 0'J/10/:14 W$if,Mf 1'i)PHTY aFt_41R0 1 ';G 0-?/1I)AIS MJ rl1-f'AI•.4 01• PANRA( ;4,JA/ f.3/1U/94 MN UPFIA4'1 4S NATU'WAI �;tt 0?/1,0/{4 �:rr.N COtJYr'rAf_'1'tlJ, INt". �:b!_9 : �/10/ip plra}JTSG51.t.'i !!tGl,)fY ,1G •,U!60 0'/10194 Aft! CvJ)Pf4i;J1 £ CLAPP ;141 0'2/ 10/94 .v 7111,1 IN f ;(c','r1' Ffivic' ,)341 U?I 17:94 JFAl1rJ StJ' :P.":C cNV'q :5 1 1:'f •,.„n0 f, faelY ', ' 1.•;Al Sf,..i Nt•'.,b ,,:!1,:3 U't!111r�)4 ►.'. "..lw, f..•r!r!:�•,,, 1 ,r `h/ it )/tif yr!16 ,:tp , In �_', •, 1'i;tl, ,'/1�1 "•4 •1,A 1. •:t.•,,,•; .h', it .'If 1''i ;4 all 10",91 0n''F'1 A., ^,11, 1 . • 'r , •1'%/li"!':4 .r,.,a, I. .. _ ,)1.11 ., , 1. . �1 �,/1.1 [')b M,.+1 ..1r 1 1,t .•Y •. 4. ,'r bisbltr ement icurnal OEIGRIPTION AMOUNT :n 681 CORREC'• COD 1Us 6.S'/5.03 G3" COPRUT C40Ie.l, `3.2.1.'1 rr9' 0 OFF:CT E'rnINC. E.u'1F.09 3cl-t tCID INe, tb.51it. ?5 Gs, rnRkEt:t Mr.Itlo 96.191.6! 5' 0.P'' `111 rHEI'X WWI ?011. 10f S., F,1 �MCf.; VCISO F19.15G.P. �aI.i1,-y ,Yitr 3G! CO -.t :!.i WE4140, 3 U 124{: F., tR9 "FY* a.S94.'!4 0.00 • i.'tiE 354 PAYH-VAY KA9tM-N7/1031 1l7.nfl 110 WAiELI'ATV/ NOW F.Fb °,70.00 Q 110 WAfbfC-,A1:i T±'Tl.f. 10,90 950 19051 C'osyf-/r, Ht'' t C-0-161.31 134 CITY VFH LICENSE TA --%'3 :110.51 601 *FV* 5. iNo. nil t.2(1 tl•'vr 146.7 "12'5.',:7 !`! lCiPy p•CY t:;.; ft.f:,,_'A&V rPI.67! Mel:.. F•; JF ''r fid/114i:,� r�fi.00 IW) rf;lw•;?•::..iUt:',•iARA` It1U •:K'•a c3 rp':M.1: :tlr•:tA."i 11.fO '��:• ''1''1, tlA' 4 :ttvi=;: •`. 66.1) '_' op 1•'PIfl:`U SAL'?!W/! P I ' :.110 1 :•j '1,c'./;7': ti f_ 0 MAT i •°.i.il r, �.Rr FIt.tAw:nl, ?;'r�1Etrt P(.>►+e'►'9h 11:Lt 3°: tin. Ih r'AN-1 `„AIE Y1.h+50b R•: NF_'2A1. OHEs :lid(•. ::SvG I fl; i 1 i1/9h N:,N'f].CEI LO i Ip1'S 1 4:/10/94 MONTICELLO TIMES lfi°47 Of /+0/94 MONTI•CE'_! O TIMES 31+'1.7 02/10/74 MONTICELLO TrM 3 34,343 7l/10/9h NORTMERN STATES POW 353!: 9 02/ i O/94 NORTHEP.N STAI ES POW 367.40 00/10/94 HORT1'_Prr •6TAYE; POWe ^y►..+ud U?/ 10/1)4 NORTNERN ;TAI ES COWf s u.74H U2/ 10/94 tMiTh t: 0 5” A', Hy NvW9 :? 02/ 10/64 NOF.TNEPt,, STATES POW-; 1434 1 P'7/ 10/94 Nt+R'M,=xV nFATE _ 1CiWF '0;A, Ut►+11/^4 1l0kYNE»tl ' CAPES PMS r1nj�43 :1'%I111/gh NCQrt4Ela`a ;tpTFS P%:.W': tf,.et,}/94 RMjrUeP.ri :41 Al 6G. POWE 36: a? U2/1:7.7re ct.;.7N i, sler7E ':r;; !.,•►.t,I`f4 t'e',':r',,`e tt :♦1}:: s;1.ECiiri c. '•+t; +•1 i17!t0/?h ibiGU N^.�Tir1.AY1'e Ce71 '_-';TON NAMP1.ATr f0 1 14 1 t)/G4 U(JI'YF r:£5I l Y 0- r4xr.r1?=' �r: y:• d''! 10/:ih :JAt_0OR PUMP 0 E(MI'PM f (-Mi FA! I!HF0rl?J►i J14g1►e semcnt Jotlrn: l IIESCRIVY:On AMOJrJI CLA 140 LZ -..AL PUFLICATI0N5 311.52 1'4n SNCMPLOWIM; INFO 51.•=_0 140 BL:1 PER/Z;NOMNUPI' E IN 121.80 140 PUE7_IC HEARIN, YOM:E. 90.(44 338.16 149 UMITHi, 3.144.37 141; UTALITIES 2664.76 140 MIklTt_3S 4.4Tri.01 143 UTILITIES 11G.�i1 140 U1lL'ai1E5 1.069.31 140 Ul'7' ITIFS 14.65 149 9TILITI@S 4',3.OR 149 UTI( vflF :1d 1. 1-5 149 !1r 1! 1Tlt;' n4?l.57 147 Ul ILD IES 744.4N tt.a:!.17 16G 117{4 ,)F PAC',45 OL_l 0,? .0 1GT1 ft-PASRS,/t i rV 1ALL (41.(1? IGn i'i'.EARY R@PAiH'. 10i.r' 160 M -T eTn i 101j Rfe AIwti 404.:7+ 091 •N:Y+ 3.07 .3't Tt+? REi CEN:/:'4rF rl!Jf.?LL '1C.Or D39 * F Y"l y`., . I's 101A4 3E4 FINANCIAL SNSSEN 01/31/96 11551:01 Disbursement Journal \ ."ARRANT DATE VE++DOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT c. L1060R FUND 17334 01/20/94 GP:' GS. COOPER 6 COm 8000.10 LIOJG,i PUC.CKABE 662.81 1733b 01/29/94 GRi'Gn5. COOPER A CON 800018 MI.k FOR RESALE 105.48 1733a 01/20/94 CiPIGGS. COOPER. R {JM 8'00018 WINO PURC1••ASE 688.82 1.457.31 •C 17335 O1/20/94 U 6 W:ST COMMUNICATI 800093 AOVERTISIN 20.10 17336 01/20/04.GIRIGGS. COOPER @ COM 8.00018 LIGUOR PURCHASE 2.:815.83 17337 01/20/Sh JOHNSON EROS WHOLESA 800022 LTOUOR PURCHASE 85.50 17337 01/20/94 JCIHNS.ON BROS W14OLESA 6.00022 WINE PURCHASE 1:725.92 17337 O+/2O/4h JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA GOOO.P2 11•FYh 112.88CR 1.768.54 •r 17338 01/20/9h PHILLIPS € SONS COIF 800037 WINE PURCHASE 687.20 17318 01/30/94 PHILLIPS A SONS CO/E 800037 L.2060A PURCHASE 042.1.0 1.629.68 'C 17339 01/20/94 NN DEPT OF K OLIC HA 800125 LICENSE 20.00 17340 01i20/9& JOHNSON WHOLESA 8000')? LICUOR PUPHCASF.. 973.•54 17346 01/20/94 JONNSON iMS WHOLESA 800022 WINE PURCHASE 1.400.95 2.374.49 %•: 17341 01/10/04 BROSCLEIN 9EVERAGE I 800010 9r.EP PURCHASE 8.855.55 1;�?u1 01/20/94 OP.OSS!EIN BEVERA+3E 1800019 NON AL03Nr1-6Ir. GIEP 138..40 1.003.05 •i 1.^",1 i+/20/04 PHILLIPS & 50aS CO/E 800037 LIOUOR PUF_HAS8 1:+11.00 1?:142 01/20/04 PHILLIPS e^•. SONS CO/9 E00031 :TINE PURCHAGF. 355.53 1.407.39 1.7743 01/20/9b OIIALIYY WINE & S.PIRI 000040 WIN;: PUrXNA'SE 32.09 19943 01/20/94 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 600040 LI©i:OR PURCHASE 2.077.26 0.i4a J1120/94 GJM.I77 WINE & SPIAI 800040 TWEE& FURC14A'3H 1 ).30 2.926.05 r 11164 31/20/04 &'MHSOG 8305 WHOLESA 90002: L10bQQ PUP.NCAS? 238.90 15345 01/2,0104 CRICGE. +_0'OKq to COM 000019 L111JOR P'MeCA6E 17343 01/?O/J4 V'ii! I.IP5 9 00/F. 1;00037 LIQUOR FUFKCA 0- 40`1.05 ti 4Ei 01/20/9b PP:SLLIP''- v 'i11r11, r;'!1/E 006031 WIt1F. DI)R+'lvA�,E. 400.36 0ii?.71 •r 1/347 0! "llilgh Pl- -C.(.fv . ,liifle~A5"IOtJ 60008P F'ErF FUwi e,A!),: 51:.08 11,1117 Ott'0.04 t!rl.+. Of 1;1?JP0R4P1rlri 0011S 12 iIt+'L''. d.l:;('HA:iE ^41.60 . °.RC clNANCIAL SYSTEM, // 0 1/3 1/911 11:51:01 Disbursement JOUrnal i..AP.P.ANY DATE VENDOR 0E54RIP100 AM0Ur.1T L19UOR 'FUND 17348 01/20/94 PAUSTIS & SJNri 600103 MINE PURCHASE 11349 01/20/94 PHILLIPS d SONS CO/'c 800037 WINE PUQCHAS'? 17?49 01/20/94 PHILLIPS 1h SONS CO/E 800037 LIOUOP. PURCHASE 11349 01/30/94 FHILLIPS A SOUS CO/E 900031 OLIVES FOR RtSALE 17349 01/20/94 PHILLIPS & SONS CO/E 800037 *FY* 17340 01/20/94 PHILLIPS R SONS CO/E 80Q037 '�F 1'• 11150 01/20/04 CP.OS_N.EfN SEVEP.ACF 1600019 SCiP PUitGHAjF 17191 01/20/94 CI'V OF "ONY ICELLO 600003 *FY' LIOUC,a VUND TOTAL 14 193.88 049.55 1.352.47 57.30 1,125.77CR 506.38CR 027.17 6.031.00 e0C.52 3?.688.68 �m V -P• FINANCIAL SYSTEM 02/01/94 15:49:'01 Disbursement JPurnaI -'RRANI DATE Vf-NnOk DESCRIPTION AMOUNT rLr L T%U0R FUND. 173:+? 02/04/R4 SFRN7C:K'= PEPSI COLA 900001 PUP PURCHASE 173.05 17353 02/04/94 COAST TO COAST 000004 SUPPLIES 75.75 17344 011/04/94 OICV, WHOLt'8ALF CO.. 900011 BEEP. PURCHASE 1.847.80 ti3,54 02/04/94 OICK WHOLESALL CO.. 800011 MISC LiOUOR 9rORE SUP 31.95 1.874.1-5 •Chl 17356 02/04./94 FLESLM'8 PAPPP. £FRVI 800116 PAPER SAGS 37.11S 17359 02/04/94 G & K SERVICE 800128 R110 MATS/MTC OF StO 80.1)1 17357 02/04/94 GRIGGS, COOPER & COM 800018 BEER PURCHASE 111.00 17357 02/04/94 GkISRS. COOPER & COM 800018 WINE PURCHASE 356.42 11351 02/04/94 GRIGG,S, COOPER & COM 800018 -LIQUOR PURCHA13C 2.640.74 17347 02/04194 GRIGGS. CUOPER & COM 80001.8 CREDIT ON MIX RETURN ti.144R 31108-02 *i HI 1 /3r+R D?/'04/84 HOME, .10IC•F 800136 Jill':t- FOR RESALE 65.00 . 17359 02/04/94 JoHH110N BROS Wll0I.ES4 800023 "LIiOLIUR PURP.HA(:E 1.793.75 { 7344 07/04/014 JOHN ;ON CROS WHQI FSA 9000?7 W1 PSE PURCHASE 1.367.161 3.160.81) O1 -HL 11'1411 O?/04/114 J1t0F CANDY O T415H!'t 0 1400091 t:l(;..3 M CIGARS FOR REQ 1231.74 173RD 02/04/94 ..UDE rAtlf)V & TOL!ArCO 8000°1 LIQUOR :TORE SUPPLIED 64.80 t 44 . F14 •CNF 11161 (12104/94 M(JNPI :Fl LO OFFTt F PR 800031 OVFI'CF SUPPI.I'@s; 2T.83 1 /3F/ 1 0''/0'4104 KOIJ1101111 VAUUUM CE t)00()50 VAC1111M CtFA1JFR SUPPI.IF 13 LIS ' 17:IG'J 02/04/94 NATIONAL CHI'LO AAFCT (100031 AI)VERIIRIN6 75.00 17344 02/04/94 NOOTHERN glATF i POWE 000095 117I.L1TIC:; 016.47 17305 07/04/94 PAUSTTS fi SUNG 80010'1 WINE PURr.HASF 06.00 1/31111 0'1/U4/fi4 OLIA.tITV WINI, 8 SPIRI 800040 MI1( I -OR RFSAtp 10.52 173GU 02/04/()4 (IUALTSV WTHF. 0 SPTRI 89n040 LIOIJOR PIIRGNAF-,F 2.431.97 1 IS1,6 0?/04/94 QUAL I YV WINE H 11PTR1 800040 WINF. PURI HASP 939.98 +. 84.07 41'111 I t 11,7 00/04 /OA Rf1tJ'!i If., 1;,;MVANV fMOn41 1('F 111IRCHAcF 011.110 1131)(1 %13/11604 VI ItIN-i COI'A-I0I A MOT 0001151 PuP 111.kQ4A'J 41111.46 1 '.l h'. 0709194 wl- •Vui l WAV -Jowp! P? 1!0fi 1111, A11V! t+(I: it!"; 1'!'1. (!0 I I1710. Pllt_i• ;J 1t4A, 11. i0.1.11,t WK F W.-ANCIAL SYSTEM 02/10,7144 17950:312 040011WR(eft J6urrial G"RAOT GATE 'YEXDPR Vl$L*F'I*Tl0M AMQUQT tlac-0.91 PUNQ ,1374 '"-jfj8j94. gk.jo$tW- Pal rSLfP*.dV. RDOIQ!32 173.71 02190/'94 DAMMI-Imea vo-f4tvir 'If'JOADU USER OKCMASE :6.561-95 17371 OVP'U9'q4 IDA�LNITM!Ec 0lYvRItkUT 80OV0ID W314 IKWOML 14 SEER 15P.70 ?I I 8*/94 OAY 0jS19'IWTj%l; COP4 GV.00 10 BfEA PUIPC.NA34 r7fi1T 0 9.1f I c4jf 9" k ioii Dfs?rqlDUTgq C Q:ll 088010 WN ALrOHOL It 86ER 37.10 1 0 2 10 is f 94 L14Y Ods R1 tI71ro9 e** $011010 j,oj..r.E FOR Pi-SAtF. 13.8b %70.2s 9 i3 Qlt�O'8/96 CA'NW— COMER & GC101. 80001.8 LIQUOR POW NIESAti 8.368.16 11313 01/00/94 rCIQPER 0 COM W0010 W -WE FOP !ZESALE I . 178. 1;5F 7-73 0.21-09t94 ORIGnti. Cuopgv :h eft S000i.e tprx FOR REGALE 57.9h 11),104. r,6 111.-)74 62/QdJQ4. JOIMSON SltG4 WtJOLESA 6000,2? WIVE P'URtYAqW W14.64 TIM Q-2108104 ;A,#FfRT 00JOICItiG 6.00025 FREAGHT (;14AINfif 1'e 32,6 ONG/% tiltuft.6"(90 060160 um t IT; -sq 22 Pi 62/0,9194 M." DOARTKtIT OF REV 0110006 SAtiES TAT FOR JWV-z 8,00.1.00 i.� VA40-10ri- t.,Ofj-8-1'CEtL0 TIRS6 6*603-2 i,19 *19 91100194 O)Lcf-)tJ iN S.CWS k8CM! 064090 HPAIR t*tlibSR�ttN3 4),:1R 17,} :C ja.P;IQJ/Otl PA"Xltj 0- 51jMt- 00®10'3 01(4E POROP-MI, 3 i Iw-A.Q i ME I' K'i6:1134 PATUILLVI t« ISOUNA t0te D-CAF407 W10f .006610'03E %-ma 87.. OWTJO Q -01A00 -A0 0048&6 ""IF,roF RcrA6G t ?.G. 6 1 W. lcil,60 l}:�7AWW,.,-47 0-06045 U1 E POR at W. if 93.99 or,, 04. no-, z2S; 0 -3 Sfgh 14iiiM 5PC060 6C2 K-SAIf 15'. T&A .1) 44. 4 ;..1 .09 02,/OOGb TMORK' LA94AV"Iffl.t4i 060(!4{1 W4 AIC(MQ-.M SeL-Q 19qovq 16.65U.00 7?04 03./00/04 'JMM"ALr ':%WVM 304tim gi,2 q t , f iijoi., F wes ICA'A". '11. GU N,