Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 08-08-1994AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL Monday, August 8,1994 - 7 p m. Mayor: Brad Fyle Council Members: Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Warren Smith 1. Call to order. 2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held July 25, 1994. 3. Citizens commentalpetitions, requests, and complaints. 4. Consideration of appointment to fill vacant Council position. 5. Public Hearing --Consideration of adopting a resolution relating to the modification by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) of the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1, the modification of the plans for Tax Increment Finance (TIF) Districts Nos. 1-1 through 1-16, and the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17 and adoption of its plan. 6. Consideration of approval of the preliminary and final plat of the Monticello Commerce Center 2nd Addition. Applicant, Monticello Industrial Park, Inc. 7. Consideration of approval of the final plat of the Liberty Park commercial subdivision. 8. Consideration of application for carnival license. Applicant, Monticello Mall Merchants Association. 9. Consideration to authorize the request by Public Resource Group, Inc., to bill additional time for completion of the CDBG application. 10. Discuss strategies for removing abandoned vehicles from private property. Consideration of authorizing legal action to remove abandoned vehicles from Holker property. 11. Consideration of an ordinance amendment concerning allowable uses within the public boulevard. 12. Consideration of finishing restroom in the deputy registrar remodel project. 13. Consideration of appointing judges for the 1994 primary and general elections. 14. Adjournment. MINUMS REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCII. Monday, July 2B, 1994 - 7 pm. Members Present: Brad Fyle, Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Patty Olsen, Warren Smith Members Absent: None Aporoval of minutes. Warren Smith requested that the last paragraph of item #7 identify the historical significance behind changing the street name from Service Drive to Hart Boulevard. Smith also requested that item #8 be amended to show a 3 to 1 vote as follows: Warren Smith, Clint Herbst, Shirley Anderson voting in favor, Brad Fyle voting against, and Patty Olsen absent. After discussion, a motion was made by Warren Smith and seconded by Shirley Anderson to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held July 11, 1994, with changes as noted. Voting in favor: Shirley Anderson, Brad Fyle, Clint Herbst, Warren Smith. Abstaining: Patty Olsen. 3. Citizens comments/vetitions, reauests. and complaints. None forthcoming I. Public Hgarine•-Consideration of imornvement to 7th Street between Pine Street and Cedar Street. City Proiect 94-03C. II. Consideration of chanee prder with Cardinal Hills IV nroiect fpr imorovementR to 7th Street and Cedar Street/Oakwood Drive realignment. Citv Proiect 94-03C. Mayor Fyle opened the public hearing. John Simola, Public Works Director, reported that the change order came in less than what was reported in the agenda item. Brad Fyle asked if Americlnn would be assessed eventually even though it is not located directly on 7th St. Rick Wolfsteller, City Administrator, noted that typically, only the property abutting the street pays an assessment. This case is unique because Americlan has an easement over Taco Bell property for driveway access to Cho motel. O'Neill added that there is an agreement between Americlnn and Taco Bell governing joint use of the access that may address responsibilities for paying assessments. Page 1 9 Council Minutes - 7/25/94 No comments were forthcoming from the public. Mayor Fyle closed the public hearing. A motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Warren Smith to approve the change order for an increase of $42,804 and order the improvements to both Cedar Street and 7th Street. Motion carried unanimously. 5. Consideration of a variance reauest to allow a ovlon Bien to he erected above the 32 -ft maximum heieht allowed. Annlicant. SuuerAmerica Grouo. Mayor Fyle stated that the Planning Commission approved the variance request to allow SuperAmerica to erect a pylon sign at a height of 55 ft, and the item has been appealed and brought to Council for review. Jeff O'Neill, Assistant Administrator, reviewed the variance request and noted that a similar request was made by Subway Shop in 1991 and that the Subway Shop request was denied based on the failure to demonstrate a hardship. Council is now asked to determine if a hardship exists that would justify the SuperAmerica sign height in excess of zoning ordinance maximums. If Council cannot find a unique situation or hardship but wishes to allow the higher sign, then it should consider amending the ordinance to allow higher signs. Tim Keane, counsel representing SuperAmerica, reviewed the background of the former Vance s Amoco site and the proposed redevelopment. SuperAmerica thought they had a pylon until Amoco hauled it off the site, which is what precipitated this request. He described the hardship as being created by topographic conditions, etc., and that SuperAmerica provides service to 1-94 travelers. He noted that reasonable use of the property cannot be achieved without a pylon sign visible to freeway travelers. Keane then reviewed pictures of a balloon study, and also a picture of an existing SuperAmerica sign used in Vadnais Heights to show what the sign in Monticello would look like. Weingarden asked if SuperAmerica has already purchased the property. Keane responded that there is a purchase agreement but it hasn't closed yet, as it is contingent on approval of this variance request. Weingarden explained that SuperAmerica must show undue hardship, not economic, and asked Keane to give specific reasons why SuperAmerica can't make reasonable use of the property without approval of the variance. Keane reported that the site is for a business use that depends on freeway traffic. Weingarden asked if they could explain why other SuperAmerica stores without a high pylon sign have succeeded in other areas. Keane responded that other stores have a residential base in addition to the freeway exchange. The Monticello store does not have a residential baso to support the store. Page 2 %W Council Minutes - 7/25/94 They are not on the "town" side of the freeway, which makes them uniquely dependent upon freeway traffic. Weingarden asked if they have done a study on Highway 25. Keane responded that they have not. Weingarden then explained to Council members that undue hardship must be shown and that if they choose to grant a variance, they should only grant the minimum necessary to permit reasonable use of the land. He stated he's not sure if the "town" side of the freeway is a valid hardship. Brad Fyle stated that he agreed with the "town" side hardship due to freeway traffic --32 ft is not visible. Clint Herbst asked where the balloon was located for the study. Keane stated it was located at the site of the former Amoco pylon sign. Herbst stated that Supen merica would be located right on the freeway. Subway is out from the freeway and they don't have a higher sign. The approach signs on the freeway tell where gas, food, etc., are located, and travelers would see everything once they exit to Highway 25; therefore, he doesn't agree with the need for a pylon sign in excess of the maximum allowed by ordinance. Tim Keane stated that they won't challenge the Council's decision, they will just rethink the site. Weingarden stated that Council needs to be concerned about a deluge of requests from 15 other businesses for the same thing; what makes this request different? Keane responded by stating that the property is specifically designed to he a "freeway commercial service" site; without sign visibility from the freeway, it is not viable for this purpose. Warren Smith asked what percentof business theyanticipate from the freeway and what percent from town. Keane answered that they expect the majority of their business from the freeway. Weingarden then stated that he could help with preparation of findings if SuperAxnerica doesn't need a decision tonight. Keane stated they don't need one tonight. A motion was made by Clir,t Herbst and seconded by Shirley Anderson to deny the variance request based on the finding that no unique situation or hardship exists to justify the variance. Warren Smith stated that he is in favor of granting the variance and will vote against the motion because he agrees with the topographic hardship, and it is consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. Patty Olsen agreed with Smith. Voting in favor of the motion: Clint Herbst, Shirley Anderson: Opposed: Warren Smith, Brad Fyle, Patty Olsen. Motion did not pass. A motion was then made by Warren Smith and seconded by Patty Olsen to approve the variance request to allow a pylon sign to be erected to a height of 55 ft based on the finding of a topographic hardship, it is consistent with the Page 3 ^ ' Council Minutes - 7/25/94 surrounding neighborhood, and it's the same height as what the previous sign at the site had been. Voting in favor: Warren Smith, Patty Olsen, Brad Fyle. Opposed: Clint Herbst, Shirley Anderson. Motion passed. City Attorney Weingarden noted that he would like Council to authorize him to prepare findings based on the discussion and points made tonight. A motion was made by Warren Smith and seconded by Patty Olsen to authorize City Attorney Paul Weingarden to prepare a statement of findings regarding approval of the variance. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of vacating a portion of former Trunk Highway 25 to SuperAmerica Grout) and vacate a portion of the old Cedar Street utility and drainage easement. Jeff ONeill, Assistant Administrator, reviewed the request by SuperAmerica to vacate a 15 -ft strip of the 60 -ft utility easement on the old Cedar Street and the entire section of former Highway 25. ONeill noted that Council should consider requiring SuperAmerica to enter into an agreement to accept future liability for costs associated with repairing or replacing private site improvements impacted by future city improvements. Brad Fyle asked if there are any utilities located in this area. OWeill reported that there is a telephone line, and John Simola, Public Works Director, stated there is a water main stubbed in that direction. After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by Patty Olsen to approve vacating a 15 -ft section of the old Cedar Street utility easement and to vacate the entire portion of the old Highway 25 right-of-way, and also to require SuperAmerica to enter into an agreement accepting future liability for future costs associated with repairing or replacing private site improvements impacted by future city improvements constructed in the remaining 45 -ft easement area. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of adolling an ordipance licensing and regulating the sale of tobacco within the city of Monticello. Mayor Fyle reviewed the request that the City adopt an ordinance regulating the sale of tobacco within the city and asked if there was any discussion on this subject. Rick Wolfsteller, City Administrator, reported that a state law passed in 1990 outlined where cigarette vending machines could be located. Recently, Patrice Bogart appeared before Council requesting that an ordinance be established that would not only license cigarette vendors but also restrict where sales could occur and, hopefully, outlaw vending machines entirely. Two options Page 4 Off/ Council Minutes - 7/25/94 Page 5 have been put together, the first of which would require licensing the sale of tobacco with the possibility of losing the license if convicted of selling to minors. The second option would require licensing, reinforcement of state statutes on vending machines, and not allowing stores to have items easily accessible. To license tobacco sales just for the revenue doesn't do much good without enforcement in our ordinance, as there is no penalty stated in the statutes. l; Comments from the public included those from Glenn Nemec, who noted that if cigarette packs are stolen, this gives a minor his/her first taste and first 4' nicotine. They would like a strong message sent to the youth. Patrice Bogart _ b stated that tobacco companies pull advertising fees if items are not displayed. XV John Young stated that a study was done with 16 year olds, and they found a 75% for Emily success rate this age obtaining tobacco products. Satterstrom also stated that it is very easy for young people to buy cigarettes. Patty Olsen commented that she agreed with licensing but was concerned about hurting businesses. City Attorney Weingarden explained to Council that the seller is criminally liable for selling to minors, enforcement is up to the police, and the ordinance would create an economic detriment to the owner/seller for breaking the law. Warren Smith noted that maybe the Police Commission should discuss this topic at their August meeting. After further discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by Patty Olsen to adopt an ordinance amendment licensing the sale of tobacco products, to clarify where vending machines will be allowed, and also to eliminate self-service sales. The annual fee for the license is set at $25. Voting in favor: Clint Herbst, Shirley Anderson, Patty Olsen, Warren Smith. Opposed: Brad Fyle, as he felt licensing only would be sufficient. SEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 253. City Attorney Weingarden asked Council to set an effective date and noted that stag should notify businesses. A motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Patty Olsen to set January 1, 1995, as the date tobacco licensing will become effective. Motion carried unanimously. 8. Beview of liauer atore six month financial statement. Joe Hartman, Hi -Way Liquor Manager, was present to review the financial statement with Council. After discussion, it was the consensus of Council to accept the six-month report. Page 5 Council Minutes - 7/25/94 Joe Hartman then explained that they are in need of expanding the cooler at the liquor store. Currently, the truck driver puts the beer in the back room because the cooler is full. After discussion, it was the consensus of Council that Hartman should get cost estimates and bring this item back to Council. 9. Consideration of installation of electrical pump lockopp for Rrpoction of the. second stage digester at the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). John Simola, Public Works Director, explained the reason for designing an electrical lockout system for the second stage digester that would have to be physically overridden to pump sludge from the digester once the cover has been lowered. This would help eliminate air being accidentally drawn into the second stage digester, which would cause a more corrosive atmosphere inside the tank and the possibility of a more volatile gas mixture. He noted that only one proposal was received for installation of the lockouts, which was from Olson & Sons Electric for $3,223.50. After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Warren Smith to authorize Olson & Sons Electric to install the electrical pump lockouts for $3,223.50. Motion carried unanimously. 10. Consideration of approval of annual MPCA Wastewater Treatment Plant survey. Mayor Fyle stated that this survey was voluntarily completed last year also. Public Works Director Simola noted that the survey is mandatory this year. After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Clint Herbst to approve the report as drafted. Motion carried unanimously. 11. Consideration of adopting a resolution of residential antidisplacement, relocation assistance. and displacement minimization plan for Monticello. 011ie Koropchak, Economic Development Director, explained to Council that this item is a procedural requirement associated with applying for Community Development Block Grant funds to be used in conjunction with the H -Window Company expansion. After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Warren Smith to adopt a resolution of residential antidisplacement, relocation assistance, and displacement minimization plan. Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 94-24. Page 6 G) Council Minutes - 7/25/94 12. Consideration of adopting a resolution of compliance with Federal Housing and Urban Develooment (HUD) reauir-ements. Economic Development Director Koropchak stated that this item is required as part of the process of applying for Community Development Block Grant funds to be used in conjunction with the H -Window Company expansion. After discussion, a motion was made by Shirley Anderson and seconded by Warren Smith to adopt a resolution of compliances with Federal HUD requirements. Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 94-25. 13. Consideration of aonrovine an amulication for a eambline license at J.P.'s Annex --Monticello Lions Club. Shirley Anderson stated that there should be no problems here if there have been no problems anywhere else with gambling licenses held by the Lions Club. Administrator Wolfsteller noted that the Lions have never had a gambling license in the city prior to this. Brad Fyle stated the Lions Club is committed to the city and sees no problem with the license. After discussion, a motion was made by Warren Smith and seconded by Shirley Anderson to adopt a resolution approving issuance of a gambling license to the Monticello Lions Club. Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 94-26. 14. Citv Council update--0Id fire hall renovation for Motor Vehicle Department. Shirley Anderson noted that she had received a phone call from someone concerned that people coming to the Help Center can be observed by people using the motor vehicle services. John Simola, Public Works Director, explained that the Help Center area within the building will not be open to the public, only to motor vehicle employees. Staff is proposing to rough -in a kitchenette and restroom in conjunction with the remodeling because if the motor vehicle office ever moves back to city hall, we would complete the restroom and be able to rent the space. When the restroom is completed, the door used to access the Help Center restroom would then be closed off. Simola went on to say that they would like authorization to proceed with the remodeling project. Staff has received some bids, which need to be reviewed; however, staff is comfortable that the project will be between $26,800 to $30,000, without furniture. Page 7 Council Minutes - 7/25/94 Brad Fyle asked if the counter space is separate or included in that cost. Simola replied that it is separate. It includes everything except the counters and desks. The total cost of the project to date is $25,270. Gary Anderson, Building Official, stated that staff is estimating completion in four weeks but could be up to six weeks. Simola stated he would like a clarification from Council on installing the restroom. If money is available, should staff install the bathroom at this time? Shirley Anderson stated she thought the restroom should be put in now. Clint Herbst noted that since the existing Help Center is accessible to motor vehicle staff and is only 15 ft away from the motor vehicle office, staff should only rough -in the restroom at this time and finish it later when or if it is needed. Gary Anderson noted that the costs could be brought back to Council once they are all in. Administrator Rick Wolfsteller reported that the Social Services Board asked to meet with him once the costs are together. They are not in favor of the general public using any part of the facility used primarily by the Help Center. Wolfsteller also noted that we need to receive approval from the State of Minnesota to move the motor vehicle office. After discussion, it was the consensus of Council to move ahead with the remodeling once we have received authorization from the State of Minnesota and authorized that the restroom facility be roughed -in in anticipation of completion at a later date. 15. Considgration of appointinir a renlacement for Utility Billing Clerk/Receotionist. Jeff ONeill, Assistant Administrator, explained that the Utility Billing Clerk/Receptionist position left vacant by Wanda's appointment to another position within the City was posted internally, and staff received two applications for the position, one from Kelly Theis and one from Pat Kovich. Interviews were held today, and staff recommends appointing Pat Kovich to the position due to her accounting background, her past performance in working with the public, and she would present a positive image for the City. This would be a lateral move, and the probation period would be six months. After discussion, a motion was made by Patty Olsen and seconded by Shirley Anderson to appoint Pat Kovich to the Utility Billing Clerk/Receptionist position, and to hire two part-time employees from the current part-time motor vehicle applications to fill Pat's vacancy in the motor vehicle department. Motion carried unanimously. Page 8 9 Council Minutes - 7/25/94 16. Consideration of advertising in Fall Parade of Homes booklet --Suburban Northwest Builders Association. After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by Shirley Anderson to not advertise in the Fall Parade of Homes booklet. Motion carried unanimously. 19. Consideration of bills for the month of Julv. Warren Smith asked if check #36958, tree replacement, was for Dutch Elm and if so, for how many trees. Roger Mack, Street/Park Superintendent was not in attendance; however, Building Official Gary Anderson stated he thought it was the same as last year, maybe a little more. John Simola noted that a fair amount was streetscape. Smith also inquired about check #36994, Aroplax. Rick Wolfateller noted that it was a pre -approved loan. Shirley Anderson asked if the double billing shown on last month's list of bills was reimbursed. Wolfateller noted it was not double -billed, just listed twice. After discussion, a motion was made by Warren Smith and seconded by Shirley Anderson to approve the bills as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. 18. Citv Council Uadate--Meadow Oak storm sewer outlet. Bret Weiss, City Engineer, reviewed the status of this project and explained that no plans have been sent yet but will be available on Friday, with bide due on August 12. At this time, we have received no direct comitments from MN/DOT, Wright County, or Monticello Township regarding participation in the project. Brad Fyle noted he would like to see the project go through as planned. Weiss stated he would like to have the Administrator send lettere to the governing bodies and use the current estimates for their public hearings, as it is not necessary for them to wait for the bide to be returned in order to hold their hearings. Brad Fyle stated he would be willing to meet with the other governing bodies. Shirley Anderson stated that if she is available on the meeting date set, she will also attend. After discussion, it was the consensus of Council to have the City Administrator send a letter to MN/DOT, Wright County, and Monticello Township requesting that they complete the necessary public hearings so that they are able to offer comments to the Council on or before August 22, 1994. Page 9 9 Council Minutes - 7/25/94 19. Other matters. A. Consideration to Adopt a resolution calline for a public hearine for the modification of the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Proiect No. 1,modification of the TIF Plana for TIF District Nos. 1-1 to 1-16, and adoption of the TIF Plan for TIF District No. 1-17 (Fav -Mar). After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by Warren Smith to adopt a resolution calling for a public hearing for the modification of the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1, modification of the TIF Plans for TIF District Nos. 1-1 to 1-16, and adoption of the TIF Plan for TIF District No. 1-17 (Fay -Mar). Public hearing date is set for August 8, 1994. Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 94-27. Mayor Fyle noted that he had received a copy of the Attorney General's Opinion stating that there was not a conflict of interest on Patty Olsen's vote of the Emmerich rezoning issue. The City Administrator will forward a copy of the Attorney General's Opinion to Monticello Township. C. At this point in the meeting, Patty Olsen presented a letter of resignation to Council and staff effective immediately. She noted she will be putting a letter of explanation in the city newsletter. Mayor Fyle noted that Council would like to review the letter before it is printed in the newsletter. Then he thanked her for her service on the Council. At this time, Patty Olsen left the meeting. Mayor Fyle stated that we are now short a Council member and asked if there are any recommendations. Administrator Wolfsteller noted that this position will be on the ballot this fall to be filled until the end of the term. There will be four Council vacancies on the ballot this year. Mayor Fyle recommended that staff advertise in the newspaper for applications to fill the position. Shirley Anderson asked if it is possible to operate with only four Council members for the rest of the year. Wolfsteller replied that it is possible, but it could present problems on issues requiring 4/5 vote. After discussion, it was the consensus of Council to advertise for applications for the Council member position and bring this item back for consideration at the first Council meeting in August. Page 10 �% Council Minutes - 7/25/94 D. Administrator Wolfsteller noted that there is a problem with duster mailboxes in the Oak Ridge development. There must have been one damaged in the past, as the post office does not want to provide the metal boxes anymore. Residents have been told to install their own box; however, cluster boxes are required by ordinance in new developments. Wolfsteller asked for authorization to remind the post office that duster boxes are required by ordinance. Warren Smith asked if we compensated for the damaged mailbox. John Simola responded that the cost of the mailbox was reimbursed, but labor and landscaping are not replaced. Smith suggested staff try and resolve it After discussion, it was the consensus of Council that the City Administrator send a letter to the Monticello Postmaster stating that the City will be continuing their policy of cluster mailboxes in new residential subdivisions. E. John Simola reviewed the Meadows ditch project, noting the material prices and engineering fees. The approximate total cost, including insurance, is $11,200. The budget included $10,000 for the project. Simola requested authorization to go ahead with the project. Brad Fyle asked if there are assessments with this project. Simola responded that if the project is around $10,000, there would be no assessments. After discussion, it was the consensus of Council to authorize staff to go ahead with the project as authorized previously. There being no further discussion, the meeting adjourned. Karen Doty Office Manager Page 11 0 Council Agenda - 8/8194 Consideration of aDvointment to fill vacant Council Position. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: With Patty Olsen's recent resignation, the City Council may want to consider appointing someone to fill the vacancy until the special election held as part of the November 8 general election. Any Council appointment would be for the balance of 1994, and the individual elected to fill the vacancy at the November election would take over on January 1, 1995, for the remaining two years. At the Council's request, the City placed an ad in the Monticello Times indicating that the Council would accept applications fi-om citizens interested in filling the remaining portion of Patty's term. Enclosed with the agenda you will find one letter of interest that we received from Mr. Brian Stumpf, current member of the Planning Commission. To date, this is the only response we have received from any citizen interested in the position. In addition to an appointment, the Council would always have the option of not appointing anyone at this time but wait for candidates to file for the vacant seat as part of the November 8 election. Naturally, the disadvantage would be that the Council would have to operate with only four individuals, creating the potential of some tie votes occurring or causing some potential problems for rezoning issues that may require 4/6 vote of the Council. I am not aware of any requirement that the position has to be filled immediately, although it was probably assumed that the Council or the Mayor would make an appointment. It should also be pointed out that if the Council is agreeable to appointing someone to the vacancy but cannot agree on a majority vote, the Mayor does have the authority to appoint an individual himself. To: 4.,, beef . l/�,y 6-,v",L Mk 3 / 14 yny ,van e rs A31ei,4,OJ Srul-p(, _T R.v7 r ��es faa ofy le, /i'I.e 1�1eA) OA) �L.o.a.v;.✓� $ 2o.N rwlf Coins» ,J'-, -✓ -r , " �/ . / ,/ / 99J 441 i✓ 'nPri /.✓ 6v4e/F �.�%e!G is v Cvo�sld 1,*A;k m 14azC- al' .i4ff.Plr.O/F '%u! C�o,.tsrdr,v,� ,. /,v C.%(wl—,y caJ i Cwomd A-4be Alo., fir P// iy.✓ .1s3G Z a? 9S- 3 9..32 0 Council Agenda - 8/8/94 Public Hearing --Consideration of adopting a resolution relating to the modification by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) of the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Prosect No, 1. the modification of the plans for Tax incr Mgnt Finance (M) Districts Nos. 1-1 through 1.18. and the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17 and adoption of its plan. (O.K.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: On July 26, 1994, upon the request of the HRA, the City Council set a public hearing date of August 8, 1994, for modification of plans and for the establishment of TIF District No. 1-17. Said public hearing notice appeared in the Monticello Times on July 28 and August 4. School District 11882, Wright County, and the Hospital District received a copy of the TIF District No. 1-17 Plan on July 1, 1994, thereby satisfying the 30 -day notice requirement for comments or questions. PUBLIC HEAR NG The HRA requests that the Mayor open the public hearing for comments, questions, or opposition relating to modification of the plans and the establishment of TIF District No. 1-17 and its plan. The HRA adopted a resolution modifying the plans and approving the plan for TIF District No. 1-17 on July 6, 1994. TIF District No. 1-17 is being established for Ronald S. Musich, a single person, dba Fay -Mar Metal Fabricators, Inc. The company, which specializes in tube bending, is currently located in Blaine. Some familiar customers are Warner and Grayco. Highlights of the plan follow: 1. Descrintion of Proier& - 16,000 sq ft office/manufacturing facility, construction beginning no later than October 20, 1994, and completed by January 2, 1996. Job creation is 17 full-time positions with an additional 6-8 positions within two years. 2. Legal Description of Parcel - Lot 1, Block 1, Monticello Commerce Center Second Addition (after plat approval). Three acres to the east of Suburban Machine & Manufacturing, Inc., along Chelsea Road. 3. Parcel in Acwuisition - The upfront TIF assistance of $60,000 (Land Writedown) is an expenditure of the HRA -TIF Surplus Fund. Council Agenda - 8/8/94 4. Siened Contract - The HRA and Ronald S. Musich will execute the Private Development Contract and Assessment Agreement prior to or on August 8, 1994. 5. The estimated Tax Capacity at project completion is $17,253, the original Tax Capacity is $46, and the estimated annual captured Tax Capacity is $17,207. 6. An Economic Development District is established because the project does not meet the requirements for a Redevelopment or Housing District. And in the public interest the project results are an increase to the state and local employment base, an enhancement to the state and local tax base, and discourages an industry from moving their operation to another state. 7. District Duration - Eleven years from approval of the plan or 9 years from receipt of first tax increment, whichever is less. 8. Estimated Imojjl on Tax Jurisdictions - The impact represents the captured net tax capacity and potential taxes not received by the jurisdictions as it relates to the 'but for" test. The "but for" test means if the project would not have occurred. 9. Cash Flom Assumotions - Tax Capacity payable 1996, $17,253. Receipt of first full tax increment is 1996. Original Tax Capacity is $46. Tax Capacity Rate is 112.873%. Estimated Annual Tax Increment is $19,418. Calculations based on a zero percent (046) valuation increase. 10. District No. 1-17 Budget - Land acquisition, $50,000; Public Improvements, $40,000; Contingency, $13,500; Administration/ Professional Services, $12,000; Capitalized interest, $16,632; and Discount, $2,868, for a total of $135,000. Note: The budget was structured to allow the City to issue bonds if necessary. NOTE: The $40,000 Public Improvements figure, which is approximately 26% of the projected tax increment, is to finance TIF -eligible public improvements within the Redevelopment project area. To the extent there are improvements that would have been funded by City general funds, using tau increment has the effect of replacing the LGA/HACA loss. The LGA/HACA loss is estimated to be $58,000. Council Agenda - 8/8/94 11. District No. 1-17 is within Monticello Central Redevelopment Project No. 1. The Private Development Contract, which supports the TIF Plan, defines the development obligations of Ronald S. Musich and the obligations of the HRA. The contract is between the Ronald S. Musich and the HRA; therefore, it requires no approval by City Council. However, for informational purposes, highpoints of the contract follow: 1. The developers shall construct a 15,000 sq ft office/manufacturing facility on Lot 1, Block 1, Monticello Commerce Center Second Addition. 2. The minimum improvements shall be completed in 1994 and fully assessable on January 2, 1995. Site and landscaping improvements shall be completed one year from the date of building permit issuance. 3. Upon satisfaction of the terms and conditions of the executed Private Redevelopment Contract, the HRA will acquire and convey title of property. Upon 30% completion of the minimum improvements, the Redeveloper will receive $50,000. 4. Minimum Estimated Market Value (EMV) of $400,000 agreed upon between the developer, the HRA, and the County Assessor. With the assumption of no public comment, questions, or opposition, the public hearing may be closed. ADOPTION OF THE RESOLUTION Secondly, the H RA requests the City Council consider adoption of a resolution which finds, determines, and declares: 1. That the modification of TIF Districts Nos. 1-1 through 1-16 and establishment of TIF District No. 1.17 will provide an incentive for commercial and industrial development, increase employment, and promote the public purposes and objectives of the Monticello Central Redevelopment Plan. 2. That District No. 1.17 meets the requirements of an Economic Development District as defined in the State Statutes. Council Agenda - 8/8/94 3. That the proposed development would not occur solely through private investment within a reasonable foreseeable future. Land $ 84,000 Bank $226,000 Construction $346,000 SBA 604 $196,000 Soft Costs $ 46,000 Equity $ 10,000 Debentures 6,000 & TIF $50,000 TOTAL $481,000 TOTAL $481,000 4. That the plan for TIF District No. 1-17 complies with Redevelopment Project No- 1 objectives and TIF guidelines. 6. That the method of the tax increment computation set forth in the State Statutes is applicable. 6. That the duration of TIF District No. 1-17 is pursuant to the State Statutes. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt the resolution relating to the modification by the HRA of the Redevelopment Plan relating to Redevelopment Project No. 1, the modification of the TIF Plans relating to TIF Districts Nos. 1-1 through 1-16, and the establishment of TIF District No. 1.17, all located within Redevelopment Project No. 1, and the approval and adoption of the TIF Plans relating thereto. 2. Motion denying adoption of said resolution. 3. Motion to table the item. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends alternative Y1, as the project meets the TIF guidelines, Redevelopment Plan objectives, and the Minnesota Statutes requirements. The motion, if necessary, should be subject to execution of the Private Development Contract between the HRA and Ronald Nusich. D. SUPPORTING Dom: Copy of the public hearing notice; Copy of the resolution for adoption; Excerpts from the TIF District No. 1-17 Plan. `. SECTION XVIII TAR INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-17 Subsection 18.1. StAternent of Oblectives. See Subsection 1.4 of the Redevelopment Plan. Subsection 18.2. 'Me Redevelopment Plan. See Section I, Subsections 1.1 through 1.20. Subsection 18.3. Description of the Pmiect. The project, located within Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17, consists of the construction of a 15,000 square foot offieehaanufaeritsing facility. This facility is to be constructed in the summer of 1994 and completed by January 2, 1995. The company currently employs 15 people. It is anticipated @rat IS additional full-time positions will be created as a result of this project. Subsection 18.4. barrels to be Included in Tax Lncttir*e+t iZnan�ilii �tritx `. No. 1-17. The following property is located in the City of Monticello, County of Wright, State of Minnesota. LeW a 'e Fon Part of PID Number: 155-011-000101 Subsection 18.5. ParralmanAMItitinn. The Authority intends to acquire the property listed in Subsection 10.4, which property is located within Tax I=emeat Financing District No. 1-17. Properties identified for acquisition will be acquired either by the City or the Authority in order to accomplish public improvements listed in Subsection 1.11 of the Redevelopment Platt hereof. 0 L Subsection 18.6. Develcmment Activity in Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17 for Which Contracts will be Sigma, The following contract(s) will be entered into by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the person(s) named below: Prior to the certification of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17, a Development and Assessment Agr==cnt will be executed between the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Monticello and Ronald S. Musich. Subsection 18.7. Other .Specific Development FZpWra to Occur within Redevelopment Proiect No, 1. (As specific development is expected to occur, it will be inserted into this Subsection.) Subsection 18.8. Estimated Public ImMvement Costs_ and A=ortive Data. See Subsection 1.10 of the Redevelopment Plan for estimated costs associated with Redevelopment Project No. 1. Subsection 18.9. Sources of Revenue. Land acquisition costs, and other coats outlined In Subsection 1.10 of the Redevelopment Plan will be financed through the annual collection of tax increments. Subsection 18.10. Oriainal Taut Capacity. Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subd. 1, of the Tax Increment Financing; Act, the original tax capacity value for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17 is estimated to be SO. based on the tax capacity value of all taxable real property within Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17. Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subds. 1 and 4, of the Tax Increment Financing Act, the County Auditor of Wright County (the 'County Auditor") ahall certify in each year the amount by which the original tax capacity value has increased or decreased as a result in a change in tax-exempt property within Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17, reduction or enlargement of Tax Increment Financia District No. 1.17 or changes in connection with previously issued building permits. In any year In which the current tax capacity value of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17•dedines below the original tax capacity value, no tax capacity value will be captured and no tax increment will be payable to the Authority. rl/M-1 0 Subsection 18. 11. Estimated Captured Tax Cxnacity Vitlue. Pursuant to Section `. 469.175, Subd. 1, and Section 469.177, Subd. 2, of the Tax Increment Finaacing Act, the estimated captured tax capacity value in Tax Increment Finandag District No. 1-17 at final completion will approximate $17,207. This estimated aan»al captured capacity value is determined in the following manner: Estimated Tax Capacity value at Final Completion $17,253 Original Tax Capacity 46 Captured Tax Capacity value $17,207 There is not an economic development adjustment factor associated with this parcel. Subsection 18.12. Type of Tax Increment Financing District. Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17, is pursuant to Section 469.174, Subd. 12, an Economic Development District as described below: "Pcononde Development District' means a type of tax increment flunciag district which consists of any project, or portions of a project not meeting the requiremaw found in the definition of redevelopmeat district or housing district, but which the authority finds to be in the public interest because: (a) It will discourage commerce, industry or manufaetttting from moving their operations to another state; or (b) It will result in increased employment in the municipality; or (c) It will result in the preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the municipality.' Subsection 18.13. Duration of Tax ncrement Fl acing District No. 1-17. Pursuant to Section 469.176, Subd- 1, of the Tax Increment Financing Act, the duration of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1.17 will be eleven (11) yam Brom the approval of the Tax Increment Financing Plan, or nine (9) years Brom receipt of the first tax increment, whichever is less. XVIfI-3 LM13 Subsection 18.14. PI ANSUAW to Section 469.175, Subid. IM, specific findings and Inslysis have been completed relating to the PMPOSed d9ve,10PMew in Tax lacrem= F; - District No. 1-17. Additional relevant docume=tion rotating to the Umaw has findings and analysis will! be on file and available for review in the City Administrator's office. Subsection 18.15. W. T=LNA�I: The Wimated impact on other mj* jwi&Uctims es construction would )have occurred without the creation of T. ,auum crentem Financing District No. 1-17. It the construction is & result of Tax Increment FinsucinS, the hapax is so to other entities. ILUJX": Notwithstanding the fact that the fiscal impact on the Odw Mxin& jurisdictions is So due to the fact that the financing would not have Occurred Without the =stance of the City, the fbl]Owiug estimated impact of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17 would be as follow if Tat No. I (the 'but for, tat) was not met: IWACr ON TAX BASE —g V �� T -FU Tax,eapactry- -,T t943 =.-ble IM, Pknble VItOt County I. $48.0.744 I 546 I 517,213 $17.2M.033% II City Of Umd-WI - $15,383,W4 S46 $17,233 $17,207 1 1.110% M.D. No. 882 518,344,524 346 $17,253 $17,207 .094% F0*tRI District 523-374,023 j S46 117.253 I $17,207 j .072% XVM-4 rim] hz�,— IMPACT ON TAX CAPACITY MI1-L RATES _ 1994 II,�,j� .,. • •� �, . , ..'Gto3s�Taii�Riite� .. • 1lsses Wright County 31.965 $ 5,300 City of Monticello 18.530 3,016 I.S.D. No. 882 60.634 10,433 Hospital District 2.744 472 TOTALS 112.873 $19,421 i Subsection 18.16. C'Aah Flow Assumptions and AgALXjjA. A. Fut= Tax Ca:acity. The estimated fume tax capacity of Tax Increment Financin District No. 1-17 at final completion as determined by the City Assessor is $17,733, payable 19%. B. ZZMjected Lmi2g. The payment of the first tall tax laaement from Tax Increment Financin District No. 1-17 will be received by the Authority in 1996. C. Original Tax rnpitcity. The County Assessor's records show the original tax capacity of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17 to be $46 for taxes in 1994 and payable in 1995. D. Gmas Tax Qparri[y Rate.The original local tax rate is 112.873 percent. This rate is estmated for taxes payable in 1994, although the ecwal rate to be certified will be for taxes payable in 1995. E. TA= Increment. Total tax Increment at the completion of all redevelopment activity has been calculated assuming a static gross tax capacity rate and a valuation increased by zero percent (0%) compounded annually. F. Al xp nditu... Capital expenditures are a summary of the items associated with the public improvement costa set forth in Subsection 10.8 and are to be fituinced from the proceeds of the Bonds and tax lncre+nen revemne. XVIII -3 0 I%r m Subsection 18. 17. Reeim9 eA Amnunt of Inde ens, It Is anticipated that $133.000 of bonded indebtedness will be incurred with respect to this potion of the Redevelopment Project. The City may t3nance lice project through the We of bonds or a3 Pay-as-you-go in the mardmum principal amount of $133,000. Subsection 18.18. TAY Increment F nmeineAecount fOr Tom= Lnmemertt Financing Di.trict No_ 1-17. The tax increment received With respect to Tax Increment Financing District No. 1.17 will be submitted by the Authority to the City and segregated by the Authority in a special account or accounts (the 'Tax Inertmres4t Account') on its official boob and records or as odrerwise established by resolution of the City to be held by a trustee or trustees for the benefit of holders of the Bonds. Subsection 18.19. Modification of Tax lncreme_nt Fin■n6ngDistrict Ne. 1-17. As of August 8, 1994, there have been no modifications made to Tax Inaemeat Financing District No. 1.17. XVM-6 0 Ta* lncreinwet Financing District No_ 1-16 (As adapted March 14, 1994) Land Acquisition. Subtotal $55,000 Administration 7•5W Profesaiond Services 2= Subtotal S70,000 Capitalized Interest 8,363 Discount LM TOTAL $80,000 Ta: Increment Financing District No. 1-17 (As adopted August S. 1994) Land Acquisition $50,000.00 Public Improvements (street, sewer, water, site development) 40.090.00 `. Subtotal 590,000.00 Contingency 13,500.00 fusional Services 12.000.00 Subtotal 3113,300.00 Capitalized IntKCato 16,632.00 Discounts 2-969-00 TOTAL S 135 The public improvement costs may be incurred anywhere within Redevelopment Project No. 1. "The City does not anticipate issuing bonds for this project, however, these costs have been included in we bonds are needed to finance the project. (As adopted November, 1982) Subsection 1.11. I,-nd Ijap. All new and/or existing development on land identified on Exhibits I -C through I -F as 'property to be acquired' or 'possible acquisition' will be subject to the following uses and requirements: 1✓ I.37 Councilmember introduced the following resolution, the reading of which was dispensed with by unanimous consent, and moved its adoption: CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE MODIFICATION, BY THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN RELATING TO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1, THE MODIFICATION OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS RELATING TO TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NO. 1-1 THROUGH 1-16 AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-17, ALL LOCATED WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1, AND THE APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS RELATING THERETO. BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Resile. 1.01. It has been proposed and adopted by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Authority") in and for the City that the Authority modify, by increased Project costs, Redevelopment Project No. I, pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047, inclusive, as amended. It has been further proposed and adopted by the Authority that the Authority modify the Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts No. t -I through 1-16 and establish Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17, located within Redevelopment Project No. 1, and approve the Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto, pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179, inclusive, as amended. 1.02. The Authority has caused to be prepared and this Council has investigated the facts with respect thereto, a proposed Modified Redevelopment Plan (The "Modified Redevelopment Plan") for Redevelopment Project No. 1, defining more precisely the increased Project costs to be made to Redevelopment Project No. 1, the proposed Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1-1 through 1-16 and the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Tax Increment Financing Plan") for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17 (collectively referred to as the "Plans"). 1.03. The Authority and the City have performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the modification of Redevelopment Project No. 1, the modification of Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1-1 through 1-16 and the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17 and the adoption of the Plans relating thereto, including, but not limited to, notification to Wright County, Independent School District No. 882 and the Monticello -Big Lake Community Hospital, having jurisdiction over the property to be included in Tax Increment Financing District No. 1- 17 and the holding of a public hearing upon published and mailed notice as required by law. 1.04. The Authority hereby determines that it is necessary and in the best interest of the City at this time to modify Redevelopment Project No. 1, to modify Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1-1 through 1-16 and to establish Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17 and approve the Plans relating thereto, contingent upon execution of the Redevelopment and Assessment Agreements by and between the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Monticello and Ronald S. Musich. Section 2. Findings for the Modification of Redevelopment Proiect No. 1. Modification of Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1-1 through 1-16, and the Establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17. 2.01. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the modification of Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1-1 through 1-16 and the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17, all located within Redevelopment Project No. 1, is intended and, in the judgement of the Council, its effect will be, to further provide an impetus for commercial and industrial development, increase employment and otherwise promote certain public purposes and accomplish certain objectives as specified in the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1-1 through 1-17. 2.02. The Council hereby finds that Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17 does meet the requirements of an Economic Development District in that it consists of any project, or any portions of a project which does not meet the requirements found in the definition of a redevelopment district, mined underground space development district, housing district, or soil corrections district, but which the Authority and City finds to be in the public interest because: 1) It will discourage commerce, industry, or manufacturing from moving their operations to another state; or 2) It will result in increased employment in the municipality; or 3) It will result in the preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the municipality. 2.03. The Council finds, determines and declares that the proposed development, in the opinion of the Council, would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and, therefore, the use of Tax Increment Financing is deemed necessary. 2.04. The Council finds, determines, and declares that the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17 will afford maximum opportunity and be consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole for the development or redevelopment of Redevelopment Project No, I by private enterprise. 2.05. The Council further finds, determines and declares that the City made the above findings stated in Section 2 and has set forth the reasons and supporting facts for each determination in writing, attached hereto as Exhibit A. 2.06. The Council determines and declares that Redevelopment Project No. 1 is hereby modified, that Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1-1 through 1-16 are hereby modified and that Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17 is hereby adopted, contingent upon the execution of the Redevelopment and Assessment Agreements by and between the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Monticello and Ronald S. Musich. Section 3. Adoption of Respective Plans. 3.01. The respective Plans presented to the Council on this date are hereby approved, contingent upon execution of the Redevelopment and Assessment Agreements by and between the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Monticello and Ronald S. Musich and shall be placed on file in the office of the City Administrator. Section 4. Implementation of the Modified Redevelopment Plan and Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans. 4.01. The officers of the City, the City's financial advisor, underwriter and the City's legal counsel and bond counsel are authorized and directed to proceed with the implementation of the respective Plans and for this purpose to negotiate, draft, prepare and present to this Council for its consideration all further plans, resolutions, documents and contracts necessary to accomplish this purpose. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, and was signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Administrator. Dated: August 8. 1994 Attest: City Administrator (SEAL) Mayor -5- S EXHMIT A TO RESOLUTION NO. The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the establishment of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17 as required, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 3, are as follows: 1) Finding that Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17 is an "Economic Development District" as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 12. Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17 consists of one parcel which does not meet the requirements of a redevelopment district, mined underground space development district, housing district or soils correction district. The Authority and the City find Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17 to be in the public interest because: 1) It will discourage commerce, industry, or manufacturing from moving their operations to another state; and 2) It will result in increased employment in the municipality; and 3) It will result in the preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the municipality. 2) Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the Council, would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonable foreseeable future, and therefore, the use of Tax Increment Financing is deemed necessary. City staff has reviewed the available financing costs for the development. Due to the high cost of site acquisition, the project would not be financially feasible without the City's assistance. 3) Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17 will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of Redevelopment Project No. I by private enterprise. The project to be developed, which will be located within Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17, consists of an 15,000 square foot office/manufacturing facility. This facility is to be constructed in 1994 and be substantially completed by January 2, 1995. It is anticipated that 15 additional full-time positions will be created as a result of this project within two years. 4) Finding regarding the method of tax increment computation set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469,177, Subd. 3, Clause (b), if applicable. The Council does = elect the method of tax increment computation set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subd. 3, Clause (b). 5) Finding regarding duration of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17. The duration of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-17 will be nine (9) years from the date of receipt of the first tax increment or eleven (11) years from the original approval of the Tax Increment Financing Plan, whichever is less. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subd. 3, the City requests 100 percent of the available increase in assessed value for current expenditures. tna, repmra, epwp. _419 94 i Edsupplies .............36 80 "al ..,...._..........._.........2.50 xarlain Flowers. stgfpies............. atm, suppress ..... ......... 29.94 4spy.psy� 4,402.83 s, Ooal s�p6es.::.:.::...6749a us. travel• ....... swyias ..................3.790.08 .. 2600 S. supplies ................ ollance ......................_210.16 1.059.61 ries. psYmpita .............510.00 +elk, sorvkes ......................:...... ;am& ......................79.75 xarlain Flowers. stgfpies............. :entp ...................151.78 7 0540 n. S .,. upp...................:....23.15 ,to Ford Tract., e0ulpwent..... avel..................................ASO us. travel• ....... . ummief ........................76.95 .. 2600 ro_ OtherW_...............300 00 . haw+ ............... .............22.so nbhc Co. irrc., equap , wppsas.__e1 Service, tpepnarne .........166.70 m library auppllt .. ........,,754.69 Man Program. suPPs4e 11_11.. .......1962 c.,CrModal$12W x.__434.88 1.583.77 wren, food- ood.........................72.58 'Se rppty. supplies ................... 17 77 on, travel...........................65.75 anatica4 Association, suppiba...... res. supplies .....................55 50 :are, strypkes._................717.?3 Foods. r,mpkas. .....................58569 bWlddgo 1nI. .................21.783,00 SSE, . ...90.60 90.60 7dxai eupgkes .1..........111... 78.04 Stonke, paynenta...........9,921.93 raw Hr supplies.........._....... nis ...._.. idif. payne....._.. 1,341.00 :hn, payrim nts ...................604.50 rhsdpt, suPpiss ................... 1111... .,to Baan take, straptas....... 12.50 avel....................................7286 WAD Kbbtrift0m, have.. .._ ................ :. supplies ...........................134.68 WleP Thmllpson, harp... 11111111.. . hovel..............................18.25 +elk, sorvkes ......................:...... M. ,have..........................186.80 xarlain Flowers. stgfpies............. tvel........ _........................... 7 0540 havol..................... _.............6116 ,to Ford Tract., e0ulpwent..... ._ ..........................................72.00 us. travel• ....... Hmmeie!r, mbc........._........ .. 2600 for, Supplies .........................156 35 travel ...................................335.00 nbhc Co. irrc., equap , wppsas.__e1 1weY, tervlcE ........................200.00 m .h, wpplieq_ ..._........_.........,.1700 Man Program. suPPs4e 11_11.. .......1962 .. grow expenaos.............. 1.583.77 nes Monttcelb, mbc...........1,558.i0 Jo Japson, travel .........................•..11104 travel ................................_...so 00 ........382.53 anatica4 Association, suppiba...... M Waktin0, repalt.................527.60 roods• otRtpkn ......................... 1mkl, 4r ............................18000 Foods. r,mpkas. .....................58569 th. Das .............................4 65 I0ma9. , travel. . ........ 20650 ass, travel 1111......_ ...................112.35 raw Hr supplies.........._....... rn0y Stock. travel ......................78,35 JREF k: Accara, m!u ...........1,055 Filed Chicken. rupp0es...........146.75 rhsdpt, suPpiss ................... 1111... nam, 0 avai...................... •......10000 3rew, PH D.. samm..............25500 WAD Kbbtrift0m, have.. .._ ................ by", sarvkes .......................12.00 WleP Thmllpson, harp... 11111111.. Lerdockp, if......................422.23 hope Petwoon, trawl ....... ........._ fiynn Motioned, ap• rervicaa ..807,30 xunp Lto., fltel ......................7.256.96 1,922 77 mdauist. havaf.........•............112 69 'f�' ComParrryry. etrppim............_21.60 Dion Coop ON, repahs. _...._......213 00 errant, haws ............................13425 Wattsm, Navel ..............11 .11..1. 27363 wnntm. travel, a ttppibt.............. 87.47 bWryy0Gkl, wp{dles.............................31.60 +elk, sorvkes ......................:...... 220,00 xarlain Flowers. stgfpies............. 90,00 _04mt, Suppose, .._ ................... NOTICE 18 HEREBY OMEN stat to tlpaYq and Reftoolopn wit "notify aha •Auag ftl ,to Ford Tract., e0ulpwent..... MISS 00 us. travel• ....... 21000 u. haws..............•................16500 t ad pn�ry, tuppWr ....t... _1111... iranaparl re�eae .........................x0296 900 nbhc Co. irrc., equap , wppsas.__e1 65 m 4200 Man Program. suPPs4e 11_11.. .......1962 e fit• ........................ rMmucOtem-HIS, IFwm 8erviaa, supplhs.:._.........233 W Jo Japson, travel .........................•..11104 Patmdo, travel... ............ _..._.....,21780 anatica4 Association, suppiba...... •. 3300 roods• otRtpkn ......................... 924 93 Foods. r,mpkas. .....................58569 Seco, Oiwkn 93. peymvms........ _... 77243 onab"s 'rpWs ...........................2000 raw Hr supplies.........._....... •4942 JREF k: Accara, m!u ...........1,055 00 rhsdpt, suPpiss ................... 1111... •.,49 C0 25 uml9anodeeo. hevd.• .............42500 WAD Kbbtrift0m, have.. .._ ................ 5363 WleP Thmllpson, harp... 11111111.. ...4982 hope Petwoon, trawl ....... ........._ 1 ..17550 Lae, Inc ... 1111 1111. ......._.. 111_1_ 1,922 77 2000 Mumirs "rim sur tJatW: July 18, 7994 Karr LaVom Nordeen, Coon Admirestraltx Done Robert M. HapO (4333314 M. THORNTON.}iE00, R IF, JOHNSTON a DOLAN. P.A toll Braedwey. P.O. ale Alexandria, MN 563M (872) 762-7387 8 21 (AM 21 a za, 1994) NOTICE Of PUBLIC NEAR= Cm OF MONTWAM.LO COUNTY OF WAXWT - STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Me City CouneO (the 'Counci)*) In and for the CtN of pp p NfrCily state 5 Eastrmb hold a�0• hearkp W to 6, 7981 a 7 m., if Cay Hai, 250 East Br prophearing n to 1 as posed m alkaaan. by kbramed soba c� pd enlarged epprava em. ft Pw ttinorxo Geis Redevelopment Tw � RRodekdarrn� a p optwed mod7M1eaNat GaamObkkts No. f-/ 1-16. IOSStod w10dn Redeve"imerd Project No. 1: and 0* p edoptbn of Tax fipempri Fhtmic4q Pian tetetYq to Tax ►xremeM M+ancing Ren No. i -i 7, also $*COW within Redevelopment Project No. 1, a6 pwtuant to at M secordance with Mimetota statutes. Sections 469.001 to 469.047, kidurt wr amarxbd. and SKO" 469.174 to 469.179. hne4- she, q amended. A ospy of ane Modt6W Redsve{oixnerd Ran fon Redevelopment Project No. i and Tax hwanwa Fbtaldrnp Pia» for Tax awemom Financing Diatkts No. 1-1 1.17, as proposed to es adopfad el the of loo at the City AAmk*WaW at City Hai not tater Jtey 25, 1994. Tub properly comprissg Tax Mooment Fir wxbV District W 1.17 is It idiom: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ^r i•'!..rii��`_ .:�, : .sur' ' ' ti .•e- . i it 1111 ".n•rtw..r. an_i._ o �a.rww.rwr•«ur r.r..r . av4c xvrc r)nw, .�ir r� wrwoww+ 1•,111, wnw..r r r " 71 s4x.errya . ++6i:rio �Warbler, 31. � PID Number: 155411.000101 Ftatltp lnkrtrtatlon raga Arg ane den8kullon of bre parent a be kxiu0ad In Tax trnonm n F Wwbtlp Madrid No. i • 117 may be obtalr ed boar Ob o8ka 01 Ifw City AdmWsbator, Perspu nuM appam 11 aie roerifip en0 aaepd B+eM Neva pa6y p M wAtlnp. Det d: 26 1994 BY ORDER OF ITY COUNCIL -Jef O elt A CTHE RY Adrainfamor (AllY 28 S Aug 4. 1 ) CCbar�...tratter of It" ev aWtlrtr.tor of aaRi uwar o► oaaoxrre.. ................................ plan «lmgMtto :oni. agar r err. rr +or, ra.«rrr tra�m,n.sraaaltaft W Kt rrrrrlr..r•rurr,y M+.« . v.rrraurrr,r r.i.r.,� - r•4r «rrrww «rrrsri~r err rw.wr sur UM, +I{rrr+ N rM w 1111+ Ulrwd 4«N . , Ur,r r trw, sur+ M w I9a�tq sp NOUSpq AMAAMA Rud MbTVAUTW0FM err+ w r. rr.rlrr +w+. ►rr w nr ir.ws 1« CRY OF MORMILaA.COUNTY Or WRI0"T STAT! OF YSfMSSOTA ar++w+ 1larrr« . wr. r NOTICE 18 HEREBY OMEN stat to tlpaYq and Reftoolopn wit "notify aha •Auag ftl e of Minnesota, real hold a pWic hing of the City of MonttCatfO County of Might, hewing Watllwm y,, Aug- 3. Igi4a • app T M'. ad W rN�p proposes ao0uaabn end dapo~ W proprio q atwsbnzed Y9Xan1 Nriciip Poopenr Tae Ylar~ FYmK4q DOW No. 1.17. ttyel proporad for frequlrlUon and wgpuenl dirporttbn rel4ihi Tax Upwnem Financing Ostrich OaWd No, 1.17 ag kaosrr: eess��pp��texxsr of : LagM Auml e— egtak4tntsr rr "Woe in NOnhW NorIh 3) WOOS boated ant i OUWW (NY.r Ip) M eta NW iN /R of 84r 13. Taowmhip 121. Range 26, Aedit'$ Subd� 91, Monticello, Yihfynl [ear grxttgl. t y� inneso C i6Minnesota. e fit• ........................ '"t • '' uuur:fu Council Agenda - 8/8/94 Consideration of aooroval of the ureliminary and final plat of the Monticello Commerce Center 2nd Addition, Auolicant. Monticello Industrial Park. Inc. W.O. ) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Monticello Industrial Park, Inc., requests that the City Council consider approval of the preliminary and final plat of the Monticello Commerce Center 2nd Addition. The plat consists of a single 3 -acre parcel located on Chelsea Road directly east of Barger Addition, Lot 1, Block 1. The property is being platted in anticipation of the sale of the land to Fay -Mar Industries. Fay -Mar is planning to build a 15,000 sq ft tip -up panel or block structure. Fay -Mar manufactures and fabricates steel tubing used in a variety of applications such as snowmobile handle bars and shopping carts. Fay -Mar is currently located in Blaine. The plat is very simple and meets all of the requirements of the city subdivision ordinance. The associated site plan is currently under review and appears to comply with business campus regulations with one exception: As with many industrial sites, it is requested that in the areas where expansion is expected, parking lot and drive areas be allowed to be installed without curb and gutter. This particular variance request will he presented at the next Planning Commission meeting. UTILITIES Roadway, storm sewer, and water main utilities are in place to serve the site without any public improvements. Sanitary sewer service is not directly available to the site due to the fact that the sewer main is located at great depths underneath Chelsea Road. However, service stubs are located nearby at the Barger property and at another location approximately 130 ft to the east of the plat. In conjunction with approval of the final plat, an agreement will need to be reached between the City and the property owner identifying the design and the funding of a secondary sewer main that will need to be installed to serve the plat. 0. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to recommend approval of the preliminary and final plat of the Monticello Commerce Center 2nd Addition. Council Agenda - 8/8194 Approval of the final plat is subject to Monticello Industrial Park, Inc., constructing or providing a guarantee assuring construction of necessary sanitary sewer service lines. This alternative would also enable Fay -Mar Manufacturing to maintain a relatively tight time frame for construction. Motion to deny approval of the preliminary plat of the Monticello Commerce Center 2nd Addition. At this time, City staff sees no reason why this alternative should be selected. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of preliminary plat of Monticello Commerce Center 2nd Addition. NONTICE.IZ OONMIRtC6 CENTER 2ND ADDITION 19F LLEr ZONED ` o I - 1 Mme.• � � • , I yAtk.5tM0.r Q 'e \ 4 r. IHrFgs CD I l4 c sul r' /tn�• r •PJ, MIMI fDMa K � 91�It` yf MA: Pl 43 �•dS• ��y�4Y H M6, r� 64nGc� I /a ) 94 / '� ems• r� ' J� / �� / � • �� �'•"� LOT f 44llr,, BLOCK f A'C � I ZGNED \ 3.00 ACRES �Air, / 8-C EtB Cy� B3'J�p \ �.. > I ZONED/ 40 • • • \ \ _ •,i, \`-```` moi\ �� � ' �Y:.�n ..el , gra [wct ;M tit. �. ti��a..� r \• � i \_O .\\`,\ o r.aroran.ru.ur•.ry .. VERM ue IONED .� \ ���• '\ . \ 4.� "� / � �� �Si•f � 1 .dn i , MONTICELLO COMMERCE CENTER ,1SECOND ADDITION 1101ttIN'fv mm"v M -4 of "-w Council Agenda - 8/8/94 Consider@tion of aooroval of the final plat of the Libertv Park commercial subdivision. (J.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: As you recall, two meetings ago Liberty Savings presented the Liberty Park: preliminary plat for Council review. Council approved the preliminary plat and made a separate motion changing the name of Service Drive to Hart Boulevard. City Council is now asked to consider approval of the final plat. As noted during the previous presentation, this is a relatively simple subdivision that does not require extension of city utilities. In addition, all storm sewer facilities necessary to handle the run-off from this site are in place. A development agreement that normally accompanies a subdivision is not necessary in this situation. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve final plat of the Liberty Park commercial subdivision. This alternative allows the property to be subdivided and paves the way for development of the site to occur. Site development will be regulated through the standard building plan review and inspection process. 2. Motion to deny approval of the final plat. This does not appear to be a viable alternative, as the final plat appears to meet the requirements of the city ordinance with regard to final plat design. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the final plat as submitted D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of final plat. Council Agenda - 8/8/94 e. Consideration of application for carpival ligqnse, Applicant. Monticello Mall Merchants Association, (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Ms. Julie Ellis, Promotion Director for the Monticello Mall Merchants Association, has applied for a license to have Chuck's Amusement operate a carnival at the Monticello Mall parking lot for five days, September 1 through Labor Day, September 5. As you may recall, the Monticello Mall has received permission from the City Council to have this same operator conduct a carnival over this past Memorial Day holiday and also last year at a similar time. City ordinances require that the City Council approve the license for carnivals. The Merchants Association is also again requesting that the fee established within our ordinance for a carnival at $100 for the first day and $50 per day thereafter be waived, as the Association considers itself a non-profit organization. The Merchants Association has provided a certificate of insurance document indicating that the carnival operator would have a $1 million liability policy in effect. Although our city ordinances also indicate that a surety bond is required from the operator to protect the City of Monticello by insuring that all applicable federal, state, and city regulations are adhered to, the Council has chosen to waive this requirement in the past. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Approve the issuance of a 6 -day carnival license to the Monticello Mall Merchants Association and waive the daily fees by recognizing the Asoociatien as a non-profit organization. 2. Approve the issuance of a carnival license along with waiving the fees and also waiving the surety bond requirement. The carnival would still he supplying a certificate of insurance for liability coverage. 3. Approve the issuance of the license contingent upon the fees being collected and the surety bond being required. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The City staff is not aware of any problems resulting from the carnival's operation this past Memorial Day. In the past, the Council has also waived the daily license fees as requested and also waived the surety bond Council Agenda - 8/8/94 requirement since the carnival was being held on private property. It is assumed that the location of the carnival will be the same as this past spring, which may result in one of the driveway accesses off of 7th Street being closed for the carnival. It did not appear that this caused any problems last time and should be acceptable again. Therefore, it is recommended that alternative #2 be adopted. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of certificate of insurance from carnival; Summary of request from Promotion Director. zea Wei sant„ Street cwont iCet MonoseiCo. MN 55382 ll{a TO1 City of Monticello FROM% Julie Ellis DATES August 2, 1994 SUBJECII Chuck's Amusement In regards to Chuck's Amusement at the Monticello M811 we are request- ing the following for approvals 1. Fee to be waived (as has been done in the post) 2. A five day carnival from Sept. 1-5 (Labor Day on the 5th) Hours of operations Thur a. Sept. 1 - 3130-10100P.m. Friday Sept. 2 - 3130-10130p.m. Set. Sept. 3 - 101308.m.-IOt00p.m. Sun. Sept. 4 - 12s00-BIDOp.m. Mon. Sept. 5 - 12x00-4:OOp.m. Chuck's wl11 start cleaning and clearing anytime after 3100 if business is slow. They will 8180 supply two outhouses and take care of the garbage. That main big truck$ will be parked Im the back of the mall as not to intorefere with parking spaces out front. The carnival will bo set-up the same as Memorial weekand. No complaints from the Skillet Rostourant or the Country Grill regarding customer perking and traffic flow. Also in compliance to a Certificate of Inourence from Allied Specialty Insurance. If there aro any questions regarding this matter, please foal froo to call mo at 203-8482. Thank you for your time. 0 ALL IEll SH'CI;;I_iY INSURANCE. INC. '.11 .." I., 0.., . ' ' CER i'IFICAffi OF INSURANCE .I rl�. .t I•. •ty •I ... ,I .I1, of ,, II, :h �•I .. 0,• - o. NA-'. J AI?:.TRESS OF INSURED ADDITIONAL INSURED: „ ,.Ing t',. P1..,1 ,•1� „ • NA 6 (041RESS OF I:Crt II' ICA'lli I1111_III:R. �. I .,• HAILS: c ., Fr IMArY COVERAGE COVERT—GI: CO ".rj T'.tl L. lu�11;' r� L'ampan'r • i I i "�\ ALLIED SPECIA1 fv NSI,- 'i Council Agenda - 8/8/94 Consideration to authorize the reauest 4v Public Resource Groun,lnc. to bill additional time for completion of the CDBG application. (O.K.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider a request made by Public Resource Group, Inc. (PRG), previously known as Business Development Services, Inc. (BDS). On September 13, 1993, City Council authorized BDS to prepare Part II of the Small Cities Economic Recovery Grant (ERG) application for the H -Window expansion project at an amount not -to -exceed $3,500. If the original $400,000 grant request was awarded to the City of Monticello for a loan to H -Window, the City would retain the first $100,000 principal and interest payback. Later, the State reduced the grant application request for consideration to $250,000; however, the City would still retain the first $100,000 principal and interest payback. In early July 1994, Senior Loan Officer Brad Simenson of the Community Development Division, Department of Trade and Economic Development Office, requested the City's application be funded by the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), a federal program, rather than the State's ERG. Although the awarded grant requires additional accountability and documentation by the City and H -Window, the City would retain the full $250,000 principal and interest payback for its revolving loan fund. The City and H -Window agreed to accept the added responsibility and on July 25, 1994, City Council adopted two resolutions as part of the CDBG application. The accumulative PRG billings and the amount expended by the City from September 1993 through June 1994 for the ERG application was approximately $3,558.76, or the total not to -exceed $3,500 figure. Prior to September and the ERG application, the HRA had expended approximately $2,707.50 for the H - Window expansion. Thereafter, the HRA authorized no further payment to PRG for the H -Window expansion from the HRA General Fund or TIF account. The July PRG billing for the ERG and CDBG applications is $1,035. Thereafter, the City has received a letter from PRC requesting the City consider authorization to bill additional time, not -to -exceed $760, for the CDBG application. Of the July billing, $676 is applicable to the not -to -exceed $760 request. The CDBG application does require revisions, an environmental review, antidisplacement and Davis -Bacon Act documentations, otc. Council Agenda - 8/8/94 As of August 2 and per Brad Simenson, no recommendation had been made by the State Loan Board as to the award of the $250,000 to the City of Monticello. Recommendation is anticipated within the next two weeks. The loan to H -Window is for equipment, and the company cannot order the equipment until the State has authorized the award. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. To authorize PRG to bill additional time, not -to -exceed $750, for the CDBG application contingent upon the award of the $260,000 CDBG to the City of Monticello. L Ii W S 2. To authorize PRG to bill additional time, not -to -exceed $760, for the CDBG application. 3. To deny authorization to PRG to bill additional time for the CDBG application. 4. To table any action. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff' recognizes that PRG has invested hours of time into the H -Window expansion project, inclusive of preparation of the Central Minnesota Initiative Fund (CMIF) application, which was not billed; however, it was denied. Also, staff recognizes the request for use of federal dollars rather than state dollars was from the State Loan Officer, not PRG. Additionally, staff recognizes that TIF District No. 1-7 may have a negative balance due to the inability to decertify and create a new TIF District as was originally recommended by PRC. The HRA and Council elected to absorb those costs. Finally, in the opinion of the CDBG loan recipent, PRG was overly optimistic that financial assistance was obtainable, thereby misleading the Norwegian and U.S. company officials. As the request to use federal dollars was initiated by the State Loan Officer, the full $250,000 principal and interest payback is retained by the City, and PRG did prepare the revisions for the CDBG, staff recommends alternative 01, D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the September 13, 1993, Council agenda; Accumulative PRG billing; Copy of the July PRG billing; Letter of request. 12 Council Agenda - 9/13/9v) 9. Cousideration to autliorize Business Development Services, Inc. (BDS, Inc.) to oreoare Part II of the State's Economic Recovery Fund ADDlication and to call for a public hearinu.. (O.K.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is being asked to authorize BDS, Inc., to prepare Part II of the State's Economic Recovery Fund Application and to call for a public hearing, said public hearing date being Monday, September 27, 1993. In the initial H -Window Company financial proposal which was prepared by Business Development Services, Inc. (BDS), the uses of funds totaled $2,075,000 and included equipment, construction, site improvements, working capital, capitalized interest, and financing costs. The sources of funds totaled $2,075,000 and included equity at $400,000, bank at $1,175,000 (8"a, 20 years, 1st REM), and State of Minnesota at $500,000 (5%, 20 years, 2nd REM). The initial pay-as-you-go TIF assistance was proposed as an annual $20,000 company debt service write-down over eight years. The approved pay-as-you- go TIF assistance is an annual $20,000 company site improvement write-down over eight years. On .lune 22, 1993, Part I of the Community Development's Economic Recovery Fund Application was submitted to the Department of Trade and Economic Development (DTED) on behalf of the City of Monticello. The requested amount of $fi00,000 to assist with the H -Window Company's 25,600 sq 2 manufacturing and 4,000 sq R office expansion resulting in the creation of (ill new jobs and the retention of 35 jobs. Additionally, the request included a State forgiveness of $6,000 per job created or a total forgiveness of $300,000 (60 jobs X $5,000). In August, Representative Mark Olson and Senator Betty Adkins were notified to endorse the City of Monticello's Community Development application to assist the H -Window Company. On September 2, 1993, the City of Monticello was notified by DTED (,) proceed with fort 11 of the application process. The letter stated that DTED will consider nn amount of $400,000 contingent upon the successful completion of the listed requirements. However, Dnom also stated they were not in the position to consent to debt forgiveness in exchange for the crention of john. The State suggested this matter be negotiated between the City and the H -Window Company. Council Agenda - 9/13/93 Mr. Steve Lemme of the H -Window Company and Mr. Lenny Kirscht of BDS. Inc., foresee no problems in ratifying the listed requirements. A completed Part II application must be received by DTED before an award letter can be rendered. If an award letter is rendered to the City of Monticello, the City would loan the State dollars to the H -Window Company. At this time, the terms and conditions of the $400,000 loan have not been finalized between the City and the H -Window. The $100,000 gap difference between the initial $500,000 request and the $400,000 being considered by DIED will be secured through an application for funding with the Central Minnesota Initiative Fund. Therefore, the City Council is now being requested to authorize BDS, Inc., to begin preparation of Part 11 of the application and to call for a public hearing. BDS's fee for preparing Pnrt fI of the application is an amount not -to -exceed $3,500. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. A motion authorizing BDS, Inc., to prepare Part II of the State's Economic Recovery Fund Application and calling for a public hearing relating to the funding on September 27, 1993. 2. A motion denying authorization for BDS, Inc., to prepare Part II of the State's Economic Recovery Fund Application. 3. Table any action. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Sluff recommends the City Council authorize BDS, Inc., to prepare Part II of the application in order for the application process to proceed on n timely manner. Negotiations on the terns and conditions of the loan will be finalized between City staff and the company and presented to the Council at the public hearing on September 27. D. SUPPORTING DATA: None. is SUMMARY PUBLIC RESOURCE GROUP, INC. BILLINGS FOR THE H WINDOW COMPANY 7-2-93 Proposal $1,725.00 8- 11 -93 Follow -up $ 393.75 10-13-93 Follow-up $ 588.75 SUBTOTAL $2,707.50 11-10-93 SCERG ($3,500)' $2,025.00 12-16-93 SCERG $ 675.00 12-31 93 SCERG $ 112.50 1-11-94 SCERG $ 18.75 2-18-94 SCERG $ 37.50 4.12-94 SCERG $ 93.75 6-16-94 SCERG $ 596.25 SUBTOTAL $3,558.75 TOTAL $6,266.25 ' COUNCIL ADOPTION OF SCERG RESOLUTION AND AGREED TO CONTRACT PRG FOR GRANT APPLICATION AT A FEE NOT TO EXCEED $3,500. J t PUBLIC RESOURCE GROUP, INC. r Marketing, Development & Finance Specialists July 29, 1994 Ms. 011ie Koropchak City of Monticello 250 Fast Broadway P.O. Box 1147 Monticello, MN 55362 STATEMENT Consulting Services—June 1, 1994 through July 15, 1994 6-2-94 LPK--Revise H -Window Structure 1.25 6-13.94 LPK—H-Window ERG, revisions .75 6-16.94 LPK--H-Window ERG application, revisions, follow up with Steve Lemme 1.25 6-17.94 LPK—H-Window Project •75 6-27-94 LPK--With Brad Simenson and Nancy Johnson regarding H -Window, environmental review package 3.25 7-7.94 LPK--H-Window, environmental review record for CDBG funds 1.75 7-8.94 LPK--Environmental review record for CDBG 1.00 7-15.94 LPK--Environmental review record for H -Window CDBG 1.50 I4205 Lancaster Lone North4 Suite 1100 • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 4 (612)550.7979 ♦ (612) 550-Q231 Fax 4 J� Ms. 011ie Koropchak Page 2 NON CHARGEABLE MARKETING HOURS: 7-11-94 LPK—Project reviews, Rich Murray Project follow-up 1.00 7-14-94 LPK—Rich Murray Project 1.50 TOTAL NON -CHARGEABLE HOURS 2.50 TOTAL CHARGEABLE HOURS 11.50 Net Chargeable Hours ® S90/Hour (LPK) 11,035.00 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 51.035.00 $1,035.00 TERMS: NET DUE UPON RECEIPT, 1.33% PER MONTH SERVICE CHARGE ON PAST DUE ACCOUNTS (q) It PUBLIC RESOURCE GROUP, INC. I Marketing, Development & Finance Specialists August 1, 1994 Ms. 011ie Koropchak Economic Development Director 250 East Broadway P.O. Box 1147 Monticello, MN 55362 RE: H -Window Budget Dear 011ie: Pursuant to our earlier conversation, I would like to follow-up relative to our authorized budget for completing the Economic Recovery Grant application to assist the expansion of the H - Window Company. When this process began in 1993, we had estimated fees totalling $3,500. As you are aware, this project has become increasingly complicated because of foreign ownership and historical financial performance. In addition, the State has now determined that it will use federal funds to finance the project which requires additional documentation and an Environmental Review. The City will, however, be eligible to retain aU of the repayments for its revolving loan fund. As a result, Public Resource Group, Inc. is requesting the authorization of additional related to this project to cover at least a portion of the increased time needed to complete the application process. We request authorization to bill additional time, not to exceed $750. Please call me at (800)642-6258 with any questions. Sincerely, v) nardeV1� 4eonard P. Kitsch 'President L cc: Patrick W. Pelstring, CEO `I 4205 Lancaster Lane North 0 Suite 1100 • Sllnntapohs, Minnesota 55441 0 01:) 550.7979 4(61:) 55119221 Fox_ 4 (4) Council Agenda - 8/8/94 Discuss strategies for removing abandoned vehicles from private property. Consideration of authorizing legal action to remove abandoned vehicles from Holker urooertv. (J.OJ A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: For the most part, the current method for obtaining compliance with rules regulating abandoned vehicles has worked fine. Under our existing process, a property owner with an abandoned vehicle is given a notice of the violation. Most people respond to the City notice in a fairly prompt manner. If compliance is not achieved within _ days, then a citation is issued by the Wright County Sheriffs Department. Usually, issuance of the citation is sufficient to encourage removal of the vehicle for those who ignored the City notice. There are those, however, that ignore the Sheriffs citation and are not concerned about the potential for prosecution. According to the City Attorney, there is good reason why scofflaws should not be concerned about prosecution. He says that judges generally do not like to make criminals out of people who store junked or semi -junked vehicles on their property. Weingarden believes that the best way to obtain compliance with the abandoned vehicle ordinance once it is determined that a violator will not respond to the citation or numerous notices is to seek Court approval to remove the vehicle. At the meeting on Monday, the City Attorney will provide additional information regarding the process and coat of obtaining compliance with the ordinance. After a review of the options, Council is asked to consider authorizing the City Attorney to take legal action to remove two abandoned vehicles on property owned by Paula Holker. As you have already guessed, the owner of uie property had not responded to repeated notices of the violation and associated citation. Gary Anderson will be available to provide additional information regarding enforcement action taken with regard to the Holker situation. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Authorize the City Attorney to take legal action to remove vehicles from the Holker property. Under this alternative, the City will take legal action that would allow the City to simply remove the vehicles from the property and charge the expense to the property. The cost in attorney's fees to complete this process may amount to $1,600 to $2,000. Council Agenda - 83/94 Deny the request to authorize the City Attorney to take legal action to remove vehicles from the Holker property. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: In order to maintain credibility of the City's ability and will to enforce our ordinances, it is probably necessary to take legal action to remove the abandoned vehicles from the Holker property. D. SUPPORTING DATA: The City Attorney will be present to discuss the matter further. 14 Council Agenda - 8/8/94 > > . Consideration of an ordinance amendment concerning allowable uses within the public boulevard. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: In 1987, a number of changes were made to our ordinance regulating uses in the boulevard that further defined that the City would not allow advertising/newspaper boxes or tubes to be individually placed along the boulevard at each home in new subdivisions but would only allow them under the cluster concept. The specific conditions added to our ordinance were in response to the former Postmaster's efforts to have cluster mailboxes installed in new subdivisions. With the new mailboxes being clustered, the City wanted to follow through with the newspaper and advertising tubes to also be clustered to cut down on the amount of obstructions within the boulevard. The new Monticello Postmaster, Mr. Jack Hutchinson, has now taken a different position regarding cluster mailboxes and has indicated the Postal Service will no longer be providing these boxes for new subdivisions. While the Postmaster is not opposed to the cluster concept, they will no longer be providing the boxes free of charge and, therefore, have instructed homeowners in new areas that it is their responsibility to construct and pay for their own mailbox. In further reviewing our existing ordinance, it came to our attention that the wording of the ordinance did not indicate that mailboxes had to be constructed in the cluster concept in new subdivisions, only that mailboxes were allowable uses in the boulevard. We believe this was an oversight and was never a problem before because the Postal Service had always required new mailbox installations in new subdivisions to be under the cluster box concept. We then followed with amendments to our ordinance to also require that all advertising and newspaper tubes likewise be of the cluster concept in new areas. While the Postmaster is still in favor of cluster box locations for neighborhoods, the Postal Service will no longer pay for the boxes; therefore, it may be beneficial for the City to amend its ordinance to indicate that the homeowner does not have a choice of an individual box placed wherever they choose but requiring neighborhoods to provide a cluster mailbox. An amendment requiring new mailboxes to be under the cluster concept would just correspond with our existing ordinance requiring all advertising tubes to be of the cluster concept also. Council Agenda - B/8/94 B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: a 1. Adopt the ordinance amendment as proposed requiring new subdivisions to have mailboxes under the cluster concept only. 2. Do not adopt the ordinance --Council would be comfortable with new subdivisions having individual mailboxes. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: If the City is going to continue with the requirement of allowing advertising/ newspaper boxes or tubes under the cluster concept only, it would appear that we should amend our ordinance to also require the same of mailboxes. One disadvantage to the cluster mailbox concept for the homeowner is that it can subject the mail to more vandalism than if they were located at each individual home. Overall, the idea of cluster mailboxes in units of 6-8 per location, along with continuing the clustering of advertising/newspaper boxes, seems to be more aesthetically pleasing for a neighborhood. As a result, it is recommended that the ordinance be clarified by adopting the amendment proposed. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of ordinance amendment. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS THAT ORDINANCE SECTION 8-6-5 PERTAINING TO ALLOWABLE USES WITHIN THE PUBLIC BOULEVARD BE AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: 8-6-3 (B): Mailboxes for U.S. Postal Service, Drovidesi all installations of mailboxes in new subdivisions are of the "cluster" concent. Passed by the City Council this 8th day of August, 1994. Mayor City Administrator 0 Council Agenda - 8/8/94 12. Consideration of t3nishine restroom in the deputv re4strar remodel ro ect. (G.A.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: At the Monday, July 25, 1994, Council meeting, Council directed City staff to get back to them with a price to finish the restroom in the deputy registrar remodeling project. The coat to finish the restroom with the plumbing, building labor, drywall labor, floor the material and labor, and the building materials amounts to a total of $982.17. On the enclosed sheets you will see a breakdown of the costa attributed to the completion of the restroom. Also enclosed please note the cost breakdowns for the materials and labor to complete the remodeling of the old Monticello Fire Station for the deputy registrar. The total for the materials and labor is $25,378.19. If we add in the cost to complete the restroom, we end up with a total to remodel the existing building for the deputy registrar of $26,360.19. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the request to complete the restroom for a figure not to exceed $982.17. 2. Motion to deny the request to complete the restroom for a figure not 0 to exceed $982.17. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: With the bid estimates that have been received and with some of the work already started, even with the $982.17 to complete the restroom, we are at a total of $26,360.36. This total is within the range that was given to City staff, that being $25,000 to $30,000 to complete the building renovation for the deputy registrar relocation. This figure does not include any fixtures needed to equip this space for occupancy. City staff will update the City Council on the renovation progress to date at Monday night's meeting. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the bids on the motor vehicle renovation at the old fire hall. RIDS ON MOTOR VEHICLE RENOVATION AT OLD FIRE HALL �� PRICE QUOTES I I cc;; RAC;;s Bulldl Mason Plumbing Keating Eleclncal Bt iWl BuRc TWirK—bm Cabinets Drywall Floor Peinti B01di Debris II Flonrrs I Masonry 9I I M_aterlal I Lybor I I I IC erinasl I Slanaa�eDisco ; !ran m alama7eQ0 rsl .500.00 I � � —� - � -- — ' IIIpIB a H Masonry I 1 62.475.001 1 1 1 1 IIB 6 D Phsnbina ( 11,150.00 I 1 I I I I I 1 IhB a D Haallnp ""Woo aa I'dson EIBtlrlt 1 64.175.97 I I 1 I I 1 I aplo Lam 1�an0er I 64.99).661 owal0 Holman Conal. I 1 67,1 so001 1 I 1 14arlen Dow I I I I 6680.661 ,Jams Drman I I 1 1 1 sa29.001 I 1 ] rGonan Valley Carpel I 1 I 1 I I 61,702.741 1 Iran Of M mltab 9500.001 ! 1 l Dam Kam 1 I 1 ( I 1 1 6175001 + I'Gly M m mlcWb I I 1 I 1 615000 I I i I I I 1 I I i I i I I I I I I I I 6 TOTAL COST TO REMODEL: $2B,=3B MVBIDS: 0804/84 RIDS ON MOTOR VEHICLE RENOVATION AT OLD FIRE BALL COMRACTORS BuilNng Masonry Plumbing) Heating Ele ftW I Building I Bulldirrp WinEows Cabinets Drywall I Floor I PainOng Bu )ding Debris Floors Materiats Labor C_ overhros S gna DI 6.10 mWnan Cams. I � a z "1.70 �- ms Dmvae I se0.00 6. vwy cervo a I I I 1 .taple LaW Lumtw II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I i TOTAL COST TO COMPLETE BATHROOM: $=IT MVBI DS: 08/04194 Council Agenda - 8/8/94 13. Consideration of appointing ludires for the 1894 Drimary and general elections. (R.W.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The upcoming primary election will be held on Tuesday, September 13, and the general election will be on Tuesday, November 8, 1994. Because of the statutory -imposed deadlines for action, it will be necessary to appoint this year's election judges at this meeting. I am submitting a list of the names of people who have previously served as election judges and/or persona who have indicated a willingness to serve as judges at the recently -held caucuses in Wright County. A questionnaire has been sent to 19 individuals; and as of Wednesday, 16 individuals responded they would be willing to serve as judges. As you know, this will be our first election with our new optical scan voting equipment. In the past, we have used anywhere between 16 and 20 election judges; but this year with the optical scan voting equipment in use, we do not expect to have the need for election judges for any great amount of time after 8 p.m. when the polls close. As a result, we should be able to get by with the 16 judges who have indicated a willingness to serve. It should also be noted that even though all 16 individuals are recommended to be appointed, it may not be necessary to have all of the individuals working at both the primary and general elections, and this will be determined by the staff later. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: The only alternative available is to appoint election judges as required by law. If the Council would like to add anyone's name to the list, you may do so at this time. �S 4P List of individuals recommended to be appointed as election judges. 1994 Election Jude List: 1. Yvonne Smith 2. Joanne Link 3. Jeanette Host 4. Betty Lund 6. Florence Mayer 6. Leona Kline 7. Lucille Clausen 8. Rita Soltau 9. Robert Rohland 10. Robert C. Nelson 11. Shirley Maus 12. Gloria Casser 13. Opal Stokes 14. Bette Crossnickle 16. Rosemary Dahl COUNCEL UPDATE August 4, 1984 Update on status of Outlot A. Country Club Manor --David Hornig. W.O.) Please review the following letter from David Hornig regarding his continued interest in the purchase and development of Outlot A. If the letter satisfies Council that progress is being made, then staff will continue to work with Hornig toward development of the final site plan and associated development agreement. Please bring the item up for discussion if you feel sufficient progress is not being made by Hornig that would justify shifting negotiations to Shelter or others. 9 THE HORIVIG COMPANIES e ' 101 IRVING AVENUE SOUTH, MINNEAPOUS, MINNESOTA 55408 • (612) 824-7503 August 4, 1994 Jeff O'Neil I Assistant Administrator City of Monticello Monticello, MN 55362-9246 Dear Jeff and City Council: We have been actively pursing the development of Outlet A, Country Club Manor. On Friday (8/6/94) we are submitting an apPlication for tax credits for 24 unite of senior hou sing and 21 units of family housing. We will be informed of the status of the application the last Thursday of September 1994. Upon receiving an allocation, we would like to purchase 45 units 0 $3,000 per unit as previously indicated. Should our application be dens©d, we will have to re -apply in Apri 1 1995. Our markot studies have indicated sufficient demand for both Projects et this time. We appreciate your patience. Siincerely, Daveid Hornig MANAGEMENT • DEVIEOPMENT • BROKERAGE COUNCII. UPDATE August B. 1884 Update on buildine inspection fees. (J.OJ Attached is a summary of a survey that describes building permit related fees charged for inspection services and for connection to city services. The survey is not quite complete, as a few of the cities have not yet responded. The incomplete survey is provided as a preview to an upcoming agenda item, at which time Council will be asked to adjust Monticello's fee structure for both inspection services and connection fees. It is becoming evident that our existing fees may need to be raised to better cover utility system costs associated with new development, and the inspection fees should also be raised to help finance needed personnel additions (contract service). As you can see in the survey, our fees are low relative to what other communities charge, which is also some justification for an increase. BUILDING PE' 1R FEE SURVEY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - Wood Frame Type V TWO BATHROOMS 1300 SQUARE FOOT RAMBLER FULL BASEMENT - Unfinished BUILDING VALUE OF $91,765 24'x24' GARAGE TOTAL SQUARE FEET BUILDING - 1300 Monticello Monticello I St. Michael Albertville Bunalo Big Lake (Elk River Rockford Watertown Bene Plaine Hutchinson Norwood Waconia Current I Proposed • Information taken trorn sunlgr oorlducIod by Paul Waldron Associates 0 - No 101 survey requlremem. I - Loll survey completed by the City • cost charged to owner. 2 - Survey required - compleW by private party, reviewed by the City. Irlspecton Fee $460 ??? _ 4� $602 $604 $604 $602 $602 $602 $602 $602 Plan Review' $50 ??? $100 $392 $392 $301 $391 $391 $301 $301 Surch. $38 ??? $46 $46, $46 $46 $46 _ $46 $46 $46 Water Hookup Fee $300 ??? $450 $1,070 $1,000 $400 $750 $500 $600 $655 Motor/Other $100 ??? $100 $0 $60 $60 $65 $90 $65 $98 Sewer Hookup Fee $300 ??? $450 $1.300 $850 $300 $750 $500 $200 $480 Treatment Plant 0 I Storm Sewer Access 0 7? $10011 Survey— I Z � � 2 I 0 2 a 2 x Plumb. 7?� 50 $100 $475. $45 $84 Mechanical $19 $01 ?7T, 1 $0 $100 $381 $38 $0 $50 $50 $45 $38 $45 $381 lElectric $45 771 $O i45 $45 $45 $45 $45 N5 $/5 IDEPST $0 0 �I 01 O 0 0 0 0 (500 0 1 I I (Stn Dpst� Other _1 _ iprliLDed (TOTAL I $1,3091 I $01 SOLO 17481 $3.8571 $3.0801 51,8371$233 _t2274 1942_L$2,4101 • Information taken trorn sunlgr oorlducIod by Paul Waldron Associates 0 - No 101 survey requlremem. I - Loll survey completed by the City • cost charged to owner. 2 - Survey required - compleW by private party, reviewed by the City. COUNCIL UPDATE August 2, 1894 Update to iob description for full-time Deputy Re¢istrar Clerk. MD.) During the week of interviews for the three part-time Deputy Registrar Clerk positions, it became apparent that because there will be only one full-time employee (Diane Jacobson) working in the new motor vehicle office, there are a few additional duties that need to be added to the job description. Examples include scheduling of part-time employees, approving vacations and timesheets, providing input for annual evaluations, and maintaining adequate office supplies. These are duties that would be difficult for me to handle personally since these employees will be located in a different building. Attached is an amended job description, also renamed to Sr. Deputy Registrar Clerk, as was done at the liquor store with the Sr. Liquor Store Clerk. The comparable worth points have been reviewed and changed as follows: New Points Prev. Points Knowledge and experience (Bl) 30 30 Armuntahility (Rlh) 34 30 Planning (2A) 1 1 Supervision (B, 3 employees) 4 0 Working conditions 11 11 TOTAL BO 72 The previous grade on the pay scale for the full-time Deputy Registrar Clerk position was 4. With the above -noted changes, the grade for the Sr. Deputy Registrar Clerk would be 6, beginning with step 5. This results in a $.22/hour increase in Diane's pay to accommodate the additional duties in the new office. Sr. Deputy Registrar Clerk City of Monticello Title of Class: Sr. Deputy Registrar Clerk Effective Date: August 8, 1994 DESCRIPTION OF WOIRK General Statement of Duties: Performs skilled clerical work as an agent for the State in processing DMV and DNR transactions; and performs related duties as required. Supervision Received: Works under the general supervision of the State Deputy Registrar Field Representative and the Office Manager. Supervision Exercised: Performs routine supervision of part-time deputy registrar clerks. TYPICAL DUTIES PERFORMED The listed examples may not include all duties performed by all positions in this class. Duties may vary somewhat from position to position within a class. Supervises part-time deputy registrar clerks, including: scheduling staff, approving vacations, approving timesheets, providing input to Office Manager for annual evaluations. Registers new and used snowmobiles, all -terrain vehicles, and watercraft for the Department of Natural Resources. Registers and transfers bicycle licenses. Transfers titles for motor vehicles and watercraft as appropriate; calculates excise tax based on purchase price or book value according to guidelines. Answers questions, by phone and in person, related to transactions, Corms, attachments, and other rules, laws, and requirements. Collects fees and ensures all forms and documents are complete and accurate; assists customers in completing forms. Processes applications for new and used vehicles brought in by dealers. Enters transaction information into computer, audits for accuracy, and prints a daily report with required information and fees broken down by fund. Organizes daily report by registration class and ensures all appropriate documents and forms are attached; mails to regional processing group. Completes Fin -8 form for the State Treasurer. (continued on next page) Sr. Deputy Registrar Clerk City of Monticello Totals daily receipts, separates City filing fees, and deposits correct amount into the state account; sends copy of the deposit and Fin -8 form to the State Treasurer. Maintains a variety of records. Prints monthly inventory of stickers and goes through stickers to ensure none have been lost; orders more as appropriate. Prints annual inventory and goes through stickers listing those that are obsolete; destroys obsolete stickers after the field representative checks them. Checks in the annual allocation of stickers for the ne=t year, separates stickers and groups them by weight; verifies all stickers have been received. Generates two weekly DNR reports (one for registrations and one for titles) including entering transaction information on the computer, auditing for accuracy, and printing. Prepares "verified" slip with fee information and distributes to bookkeeper for processing of state checks. Maintains records of fee by fee type and files with reports. Submits excise tax reporting forms to Department of Revenue weekly. Prepares daily and weekly City deposit by totaling City filing fees and DNR fees, adjusting for NSF checks, obtaining a deposit number, completing a deposit slip, and depositing, enters deposit in ledger and files appropriate forms and receipts. Answers phones and provides information or transfers calls as appropriate. Prepare newsletter articles as directed. May handle NSF checks by redepositing and contacting person by phone, sending form letters, and completing and sending notice to Sheriffs Department with appropriate documentation. May set up the front counter in the morning and lock up at the end of day; may operate postage machine. May notarize or witness documents as needed. May initiate daily computer backup processes. Attends annual deputy registrar school and keeps informed of changes through meetings and bulletins. Maintains adequate supplies for office. KNOWLEDGE, SEILIS, AND ABUXIUS Considerable knowledge of laws, rules, regulations, procedures, and forms applicable to deputy registrar work. Considerable knowledge of the operation of a computer terminal to enter and look up data, develop and print reports, make corrections, and perform backup processes. Considerable skill in the use of a calculator and in typing with speed and accuracy. (continued on next page) Sr. Deputy Registrar Clerk City of Monticello Considerable ability to communicate effectively and tactfully, both orally and in writing, with customers, state officials, City staff, and the general public. Considerable ability to analyze problems and exceptions and to determine the appropriate procedure or resolution. Considerable ability to read and interpret a variety of written manuals and bulletins and to utilize resources effectively. Considerable ability to learn a variety of rules, regulations, and procedures and be able to adapt to frequently changing requirementa. Considerable ability to account for and handle money. Working ability to operate normal office equipment. bI NIMUM QUALMCATIONS Two years of responsible clerical work involving considerable public contact, typing, and recordkeeping. CITY OF MOK"CELLO MONTHLY BUILDING DEPARTMENT REPORT Month of June, 1984 PERMITS 6 USES 'Lest This Same Monti Lest Yeah This Yea, PERMITS ISSUED Month MAY Month ,RINE Last Yoe1 To Date To Date RESIDENTIAL Number 23 29 17 78 99 Valuee0n $422.70000 $1,226.600.00 $473.800.00 $1.818.80000 {3.181.80000 Fees $328852 $8.989.32 $3.708.01 $11.517.03 523.313.79 Surr3urpea $20880 $61079 $235.85 $917.55 $1.57751 COMMERCIAL Number 2 31 18 18 Valuation $3.000,00 11108.800.00 $11.000.00 9318.800.00 $578.900.00 Fees $30,00 $1,398.81 $13100 $2.88851 $8,086.18 Surcharges $1.00 $51.30 $5,00 $157.15 $297.85 INDUSTRIAL Number 1 3 3 10 Valuamn $1.500 DO $83,000.00 {287.56100 61.159.40000 Fees $1500 $781.15 $2.230.15 $8.10701 Surcharges $0,50 $41.50 $115.78 $579.15 PLUMBING Number 5 11 7 30 18 Fees $11800 $421.00 $159.00 $751.00 $1.721.00 Sulctlarges 5250 $7.00 $3.50 $1500 $23.00 OTHERS Number 2 1 3 valuraw so 00 $56.90000 woo Foos 52000 $75902 $30 DO Stncharobs 41.00 $29,20 $1.50 TOTAL 0 PERMITS 31 19 30 133 176 TOTAL VALUATION 5127.20000 61,118.20000 _;18/.Bgp11,0 52.513.88300 ".822.81000 TOTAL FEES _$x.119.52 511.596 211 _ ".016,01 $21.1n.71 130.867.B9 TOTAL SURCNAROES {21280 +713.59 _$2181 ee _$3. CURRENT MONTH FEES I NUMBER PT DATE PERMIT NATURg_ Number Porn SurchORA ValuallOn Thts YQar Lest Your Sm" family 12 $6.051.72 9427.19 $865.00000 38 25 DueN1 0 0 MJ1LFamily 1 92273.70 $15535 $310.70000 1 0 CommercW 1 $817.58 531.00 $88.00000 1 1 IrlMbtal 1 1282.19 58,00 {IB.OD000 1 I Roe Owners 2 520890 $9.45 1118.90000 1 3 Sign 0 0 Public Slope 0 2 ALTERATIOWREPAIR DwoAnps 11 1407.00 517.00 {37.50000 16 11 Commercial 2 $58123 {2030 540.600 00 17 17 IrKRWWI 2 $502.00 $33.50 $67.000.00 9 2 PLUMBINO AD Typos 11 $42100 $700 $O.DD 16 30 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Swlmmuv Pools 0 0 DoCLs 3 $4500 $1.50 $4.500,00 12 9 TEMPORARY PERMIT 0 0 DEMOLITION 3 2 1QTALA _ 19 {t t _ _ _113.{9. {1.116200 QQ__ 170 --!;L CITY OF MON'TICELLO INDIVIDUAL PERMIT ACTIVITY REPORT Month of June, 1994 'PERMfT 94.2333 HouSoagnrage_ I FEES mUM8c4 I pEscRimom - NAM&COLA➢ON.-_ VILLUJ 1j 4 T BMQ ___suRC11ANpE_.&UM9Jft"UfiCtIAIJ 94-229@ 'Hpuso t Dorado 'SF t V aloe Plus HomeW5320 Falcon Ave t 587 500.00 t P24.92 $44 7¢ 1 $27001 $0.50 194.2300 A1laateeoarao9 IRO IHaaa AVSltnn06 Mamm Ewaoa Ra $12,0Q0.00 $119.90 3600' 1 942391 IDelaa+seaaliwe IRO ' Roo EaSmem508_RamaevSl. I IWIM.00 tog 19 1345 _ '94.2302 Mouse t on race ISF iSmmer Swicam/2920 Oak RWe Or ¢95.409.00 }556.92' V770' $24001 S050 '94.2303 'House t ca ram ISF IHomes Rus/2751 Oak Rr000 U. I _$07 300.00 1.524.11 543 ¢5' $23001 50.50 94-2304 ' lank removal A romac mem IAl , Symv_Frosh F000s2061W 4111 SI I W5.5000 t4p.OQ £32.50' 5,42305 'House A aaraw ISF I V Glue P,Ns Homes!5350 SIS" Or I 577.509.00 5!85!2 S3$ 751 $23'00. $050 94.230¢ SJa"lou,1Omo IAU lMarlanNaatavRt27SlateMvy425,Lot100 51, 0.04 115 U4 •4450 94.2307 House A Oarape ISF I Hmara Bonanm HOMAW216 AIIM+95Ippl Dr I 5*6.KQ.00 Sf0240 %Z80 s2300' $050 94.2308 _ Ipararoresists IAC IMpnhcello-BroLake HopValBOXV407 WaamnWontil 24 Q�Il1_01) ie`599 Sl�t' 94.2309 'House rano) iAD I Rooar Dame1501v900 W BroeMay 1 -$1•m 00 $15.00 $Q 5o i 94.2910 '4-txkt trwnnousn IMF InyeaiWs TOaatnor!¢f_0 Bworvaw Dr.. Onim 540. 550. 5604 5701 531Q,7Qp 44 $1.3?@QQ S1gj 35 $1 IS 07 $0,Y1 94.2311 Olen n acmes Wrcn IAD I Wtdtam Koa-v1305 VJ A- St. Col 0 $1,'VQQ.00 115 (29 W.50 94.2312 Porch wMa 1001ACOm0111 IAD Ir;hucn of Sl HO 518W aro Sl 94$500,94 $1r5.00 $Q,¢Q „94.2313 Palm room m 4olno II Sleonaln ¢ .Loan RnkatanerllQDyms Ra, I $2 §19Q0 r)0 S171.OQ 1490, 942314 'peek 1AD IKema111A Dl Wa+tluggaV5+41 Maper0lerlq 41. 09.99 $15.94 }O 54 1 L9!-2315 IHouauA ooreoo ISIF ' Sorrier QLrljypgN2S40 Oak Rape Dr 1 £89.499.09 $4AI. 7 S3A 2p, $2190 X050 94.2316 ,Houan A owom SF IMemag P1ux7277t Ops Rape Df- 167.1A,00K!5 Q5 SQ7 S� I i34•�' 5454. 94.2317 Ho-yso_A�r1r� 'FF Value Pkm HOmob'S520 FeKon Avg 554.¢0000 1494 ?2 00 9.23 ig�H wwAp_a gffl 'SF VaWa Plus Homoo529gSlenmp fk SS5t00W f3@74¢ (21.89 $23.00 $050 98.2319_ lnt(L t4 ram oonl �AI Fullnlmoni SvS MlJ'408 E 7m S1 S?•QQO 00 $m 0o $100 94_2320_ MOueo M1-poreyn rtr,•.alrlp_ IAD EOw¢r0IL4$uaen Lam" (01Courge Ra _ 52`000 0(1 $20.00 $1,90 . _iousa A garage rnr� A ramal AL Einan A Cyntrea StumptnO9 Alarm EmoW R0 $ S Ot)n Ut'1 St62 00 $7,5(1 942322_ •AFiJor_n 6 Deane WoyneucN925 W 6roa0wav g1,5Q0 00 11500 W50 842323 _Dock Intona mm00m IAU Dana a Robona Oe!agmMl VIrNVine SI 43.000 00 130 DO 11.50 H4232i _ Hqm rosh�nglo_-_ IAD _C4�_9u10 _5r✓lOOW Povw St Si•5onrx (1500 10.50 , 942325 Hwtw rwnlraJa 'AD JnelA Cray FrenMkn212E 4m SI 5$,50000 tt500 jO So 942326 Finan oosam�M iAO Carson Con51r cJronlnc CL' Qklap"-oWCrr $7 Ot)000 $gn 00 1,75n Hours A ga,ego_mrool iAU Eupone A LOIe Heuou700 [ Rage St StJAO 00 $15 00 $050 ,y4-2327 942328_ iAD Cynlma Hpglgna'214 MaTr EleaoO R a 1 15).M of 11500 J9 so .942329_ _Drew _ _ _ Leasee Wco romaaol ALL_ Luka !Oc4-lal DrRICVI 107 Hart BW. Suao 30 I 538.000 CIO__$378 5g' $�00 621] (10 $0 50 94.2330 -'House►garage- ISF Vaiuo vy;s!icn 461 Falcon Avn I S61,30000•_ 41881 $3095' tY100'_�050, ...1111 _ _ u�� .�ti.,... ..,�In,.... I[ r- A I as Pov,va/3g Dumas Ra. 810 41411 S86.ODO 00 _ $49550 _ ---$U-00 ';FV Homoa5310 Stamm pi - TOTALS X11 Av¢ Pi OP Pf a W*— HomWN M*-*Q0-.Qr. pm Tope Wtn RWWVt. Pr., Unite 540, W. 580, 570 e^ R JPa^ §"#SrodQ19 goon R9 * Q *�Q 9k RON Ur, a Plm/_771 Oak ROW Dr. Wuq Harwrp/5525 Felwr Aw. j Flue HOMGe/5260 star". or.. _ wra -eitiLuke_Kom neltMsTiallulman '!A,bin ki Piga H -4m ",! F01an Av, -. L �- P-OVJW- Uurlagq N., tf1011411 q Marl 540 Wk R" Go. - -- Phnl Hpmae5310 Sia" Dr. 1 I Ur (AL REVEWfu FkE E i PLUMBM63�_i 6URC11 15?.4Q 1 152A1� I I I I 11@.441 149,2+ 4 I 1895.79 I 1111,151 1 1 1 WN! 1 dip 1 538,751 i I I I tiz,e.re I I 1 1 14 t 9g t_lo I I I aiPig I 1 1 1 PLAN REVIEW I g.•22@9 IHOIM820 I SF 194-2392 6 canoe ISE !Ot-230, IHouse Ha -6 oarego SF 1$4.2 05 H,puee ¢ Wage 'SF 19_4:23Q7 Hougo A aaraoo ¢F ;04 -?21Q 14-L"t0or"MN�a MF IAF 64•?710 IPalnt rogm puilOM I X15 �HfxtQ4 4 pergpe 104.2018 (House 6 canoe n4.2,,7IYOUfB 6 0arBa0 SF 04-2316 Mouse 6 6arepo SF 19!•?P6 ILWMJCa-aE'If!'BaloltiN AC 104.23 0 IHpuw 6 oaraae SF 164.2311 IhMm Mop c 164-2332 Hputo 6 aaraoo SF X64.2333 Hom 6 aaraao I SF X11 Av¢ Pi OP Pf a W*— HomWN M*-*Q0-.Qr. pm Tope Wtn RWWVt. Pr., Unite 540, W. 580, 570 e^ R JPa^ §"#SrodQ19 goon R9 * Q *�Q 9k RON Ur, a Plm/_771 Oak ROW Dr. Wuq Harwrp/5525 Felwr Aw. j Flue HOMGe/5260 star". or.. _ wra -eitiLuke_Kom neltMsTiallulman '!A,bin ki Piga H -4m ",! F01an Av, -. L �- P-OVJW- Uurlagq N., tf1011411 q Marl 540 Wk R" Go. - -- Phnl Hpmae5310 Sia" Dr. 1 I Ur (AL REVEWfu FkE E i PLUMBM63�_i 6URC11 15?.4Q 1 152A1� I I I I 11@.441 149,2+ 4 I 1895.79 I 1111,151 1 1 1 WN! 1 dip 1 538,751 i I I I tiz,e.re I I 1 1 14 t 9g t_lo I I I aiPig I 1 1