Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 05-08-1995AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, May 8, 1998 - 7 p.m. Mayor. Brad Fyle Council Members: Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Tom Perrault 1. Call to order. 2. Approval of minutes of the re pp regular meeting held April 24, 1995. S�-� � 3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda. 4. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints. 6. Public Hearing --Consideration of vacating storm water and utility easement - Lots 9 and 10, Block 1, Thomas Park Addition. 6. Consideration of a request to waive building permit fees for a house being constructed for the Jacob Wetterling Foundation by Zaudtke Homes. 7. Consideration of adopting an ordinance amendment providing for interim uses. Applicant, Jay Morrell. 8. Consideration of adopting an ordinance amendment establishing outside storage and interim use in I.1 and I-2 zones. Applicant, Jay Morrell. 9. Consideration of granting an interim use permit to allow outside storage and interim use at Lot 2, Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park. Applicant, Jay Morrell. 10. Consideration of authorizing a sewer infiltration and inflow study. 11. Consideration of a request to reconsider carnival license application for Monticello Mall. 12. Consideration of an amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance that would amend Chapter 3-9 (C) by changing the sign setback minimum. Applicant, Monticello Planning Commission. 13. Consideration of an ordinance amendment adopting 1994 Building Code. 14. Consideration of allowing construction activity from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. as requested by Ryan Contracting. Agenda Monticello City Council May 8, 1995 Page 2 16. Consideration of reviewing Trunk Highway 25 drainage study. 16. Consideration of adopting protective covenants and establishing lot prices Eastwnod Knoll subdivision. 17. Consideration of authorizing the purchase of a 1 -ton bucket truck. 18. Consideration of approving the purchase of a new parks mower. 19. Adjournment. MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, April S4, 1895.7 p.m Members Present: Brad Fyle, Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Tom Perrault Members Absent: None A221yval of minutes of the special meeting held April 10. 1995. and the McWar meeting held April 10. 1995, AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY TOM PERRAULT TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING HELD APRIL 10, 1995, AND THE REGULAR MEETING HELD APRIL 10, 1995, AS PRESENTED. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of adding items to the aegr}a. A. �pnsideration of a rqsolution modifying the approval of the tax increment f3nancine pian for Disgict 1-19 (Mississinvi Shores). City Administrator Wolfsteller reported that HRA Attorney Steve Bubul is recommending that the City Council adopt a resolution modifying the previously - adopted resolution of March 13, 1995, that established the tax increment district for the Mississippi Shores senior housing project. Bubul is concerned that potential legislation being considered could affect the status of this TIF district; therefore, he recommends adoption of this resolution prior to execution of the redevelopment contract between the HRA, City, and Senior Housing Alliance. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION MODIFYING THE APPROVAL OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR DISTRICT 1-19 (MISSISSIPPI SHORES). Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 95-33. B. CdLn afilietation of application for a carnival license - Monticello Mall Merchantq Association, Administrator Wolfsteller reported that the Monticello Mall Merchants Association has again applied for a carnival license for Chuck's Amusements to operate at the mall parking lot for 13 days. They are also again requesting that the carnival fee of $100 for the fust day and $b0 per day thereafter be waived. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO APPROVE A CARNIVAL LICENSE FOR 8 CONSECUTIVE Page 1 0— Council Minutes - 4/24/95 DAYS AND WAIVE THE DAILY FEES PROVIDED THAT THE MALL'S DELINQUENT UTILITY ACCOUNT IS PAID IN FULL. Voting in favor: Brad Fyle, Clint Herbst, Shirley Anderson, Brian Stumpf. Opposed: Tom Perrault. C. ggnsideration of setting a special Council meeting. Assistant Administrator ONeill asked Council to set a special Council meeting along with other city commissions to discuss the comprehensive plan update. After discussion, it was the consensus of Council to set a special meeting for Wednesday, May 3, 1995, at 7 p.m. Citizen commentsket itions. requests. and complaints, None. Publip hearing on adoption of progosed asyespment roll for delinquent utility bills certification of assessment roll to County Auditor. Mayor Fyle opened the public hearing. Administrator Wolfsteller noted that Council is asked to adopt an assessment roll for utility billing accounts which are delinquent more than 60 days and certify the assessment roll to the County Auditor. In addition to the delinquent amount, the $25 administrative fee has also been added to each account. There heing no comment from the public, the public hearing was closed. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS AND CERTIFICATION TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR. Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 95.28. Consideratioq of arntndmertt to co0ditiena! use QErrr►it allowing a garden ceptor in a B 4 district. Apalicant. Cedar @1 et Carders Center. Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that Cedar Street Garden Center has applied for an amendment to a conditional use permit originally issued to Fair's Garden Center in 1989 for the purpose of relocating rock bins fiom the Broadway firontage to the northeast comer of the site. The rock bins would be replaced with additional parking. O'Neill noted that the Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the conditional use permit based an the finding that the amended site plan will improve the operation and appearance of the facility. Pegs 2 �\ Council Minutes - 4/24/85 AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY TOM PERRAULT TO APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BASED ON THE FINDING THAT THE AMENDED SITE PIAN WILL IMPROVE THE OPERATION AND APPEARANCE OF THE FACILITY. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of aoorovine a ioint resolution aunrovine, annexation of the 160 -acre Klein Farm site. Assistant Administrator ONeill reported that the Township voted to sign the joint resolution supporting annexation of the 160 -acre Klein Farm site at their April 10, 1995, Board meeting. After City signatures are obtained, the annexation document will be forwarded to the Minnesota Municipal Board for approval. ONeill noted that annexation of the Klein property is contingent on execution of the development agreement and approval of the final plat of the Klein Farms subdivision. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO APPROVE A JOINT RESOLUTION APPROVING ANNEXATION OF THE 160 -ACRE MIN FARM SITE. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of aoarovin¢ final Plat and adoa'ng development aereement - Mein Assistant Administrator OWeill reported that the final plat design for the Klein Farms residential subdivision is consistent with the preliminary plat previously approved by the City Council. He also noted that the development agreement is currently being reviewed by the City Attorney. Councilmember Herbst noted his concern regarding the City withholding development of the park site for five years as noted in the proposed development agreement. Assistant Administrator O'Neill stated that Tony Emmerich has agreed to a time frame of 2-3 years for park development. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY TOM PERRAULT AND SECONDED BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT OF THE KLEIN FARMS RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION CONTINGENT UPON FINAL APPROVAL BY THE CITY ENGINEER, AND TO APPROVE THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CONTINGENT ON REVIEW AND FINAL APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY. Motion carried unanimously. Assistant Administrator ONeill reported that on April 7, 1885, 13 bids were received for the Klein Farms project ranging from a low of $1,097,583 to a high of $1,403,805. The engineer's estimate for the project was $1,087,682. The low bid was submitted by Ryan Contracting, Inc., who has worked on city projects in the past and has been found to be a responsible bidder. Page 3 9— Council Minutes - 4/24/96 AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING THE PROJECT TO RYAN CONTRACTING, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,097,593. Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 96.29. 10. Consideration of aourovine develonment agreement and final plat oLUardinal Hills. phase V. Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that the development agreement for phase V of the Cardinal Hills residential subdivision is nearly identical to agreements governing previous phases of this development; however, the developer has not yet had a chance to review the proposed agreement. Steve Holker, one of the developers of Cardinal Hills, stated that Council could approve the agreement contingent on the developer's acceptance of the agreement. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO APPROVE THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CONTINGENT ON REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY AND ACCEPTANCE BY THE DEVELOPER, AND TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT OF CARDINAL HILLS, PHASE V, CONTINGENT ON FINAL APPROVAL BY THE CITY ENGINEER. Motion carried unanimously. 11. C2n,�idgratipn of a resolution accenting bids and awarding pmiect - Cardinal Hills. phase V. City Engineer Bret Weiss reported that on April 21, 1996, 12 bids were received. The low bid was submitted by Kadlek Construction in the amount of $300,699.88. After checking references, it was the City Engineer's recommendation to award the project to Kadlek Construction. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING THE CARDINAL HILLS, PHASE V. PROTECT TO KADLEK CONSTRUCTION IN TME AMOUNT OF 8300,699.88, CONTINGENT ON EXECUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 96-30. 1-TRUTIT! Me! City Administrator Wolfsteller reported that six improvement projects are acheduled for 1996, and the City will need to sell bonds to finance the improvements. He noted it is projected that the a projects will require financing needs of $3,890,000 to be paid back over a period of 10 years. T'he bonds will cover the cost of constructing the following improvements: Meadow Oak storm sewer outlet, Eastwood Knoll, Southwest Area utilities extcnnion, Klein Farms, OcellorSchool Boulevard, and Car" Hills Phase V. Page 4 3 Council Minutes - 4/24/95 AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY SH WZY ANDERSON TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SPRINGSTED, INC., TO PROCEED WITH THE BOND SALE OF $3.890,000 AS RECOMMENDED WITH BIDS RETURNABLE MAY 22, 1995. Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 95-31. 13. Consideration of terms of sale - Outlot A. Country Club Manor - David Hornig. Assistant Administrator O'Neill reviewed the original proposal by David Hornig for purchase of Outlot A, Country Club Manor, which included a purchase price of $282,000 and an amount of $3,000 per unit for owner -occupied units. Interest and term of contract had not been determined at that time. He went on to explain the offer recently proposed by City staff, which stated that the City would maintain the revenue from the sign presently located on Outlot A, a purchase price of $303,150, an interest rate of 7.6% on a 5 -year contract, and $3,000 per owner -occupied unit. Hornig's counteroffer called for Hornig receiving the sign revenue, a purchase price of $303,160, with an interest rate of 7% on a 10 -year contract, and $3,000 per owner -occupied unit. O'Neill also noted that a third alternative would be to withdraw the offer and maintain ownership of the land. Since it may be possible to sell the land at a higher price in the future, this alternative may be the beat route. David Hornig stated that he would be willing to negotiate his offer to an interest rate of 7.26% with a 6 -year contract. Councilmember Herbst added that perhaps the City could collect and hold the sign revenue, which the City would keep if the project didn't develop or would be used to write down the remaining amount Hornig owes the City when the project does develop. After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by Brad Fyle to approve the sale of the land to David Hornig at a purchase price of $303,150, an interest rate of 7.26% on a 6 -year contract. Motion includes a closing date of June 1, 1995, and the City to collect and hold the sign revenue to write down the amount owed by Hornig. Voting in favor: Clint Herbst, Brad Fyle. Opposed: Shirley Anderson, Brian Stumpf, Tom Perrault. Motion failed. A MOTION WAS THEN MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO WITHDRAW THE SALE OF THE LAND FROM THE MARKETPLACE. Voting in favor: Shirley Anderson, Brian Stumpf, Tom Perrault. Opposed: Clint Herbst, Brad Fyle. Motion passed. •S .f. ( 1 !1 i L 1 .! ' 1 1i t:1� • _!.' 1 : 1i ! 1 !V!/.1' K ':e 11'Ii .t 1i .1' =.!!v -!i '.!.! 117-111 City Administrator Wolfsteller reported that the liquor store operation continues to show favorable results with sales increasing 6% over last year's first quarter results. The gross profit has increased 5.8%, and the resulting operating not income shows a 13% increase. Council Minutes - 4/24/95 After discussion, it was the consensus of Council to accept the liquor store first quarter financial statement for 1995. Liquor Store Manager Joe Hartman requested that Council consider approving a camera security system for the liquor store. He noted that two quotes were received The first quote was from Video Production Services proposing an 8 -camera system at a coat of $7,860 and $200 for a VCR lock bo:, for a total of $8,050. The second quote was received from Floyd Security for a similar system totaling $7,876. Hartman noted that he prefers the system proposed by Video Production Services. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY TOM PERRAULT TO AUTHORIZE THE PURCHASE OF AN 8 -CAMERA SECURITY SYSTEM FROM VIDEO PRODUCTION SERVICES AT AN APPROXIMATE COST OF $8,050, INCLUDING TILE VCR LOCK BOX AND A HIGH-QUALITY CAMERA FOR THE FRONT DOOR OF THE STORE. Motion carried unanimously. Hartman also requested that Council authorize expansion of the walk-in cooler by creating an additional five doors for display of beer products and allowing an additional 400 cases to be placed in the cooler. He noted that it has been difficult to keep an adequate amount of beer int the cooler during peak periods. The estimated cost of the cooler expansion, including electrical hookup and carpentry work, is $16,000. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY TOM PERRAULT TO AUTHORIZE AN EXPENDITURE OF UP TO $16,000 FOR EXPANSION OF THE WALK-IN COOLER AT THE MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE. Voting in favor: Brad Fyle, Shirley Anderson, Brian Stumpf, Tom Perrault, Opposed: Clint Herbst. 16. Consideration of establishing a marketing strategy for Eastwood Knoll subdivision. Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that at the previous Council meeting, staff was asked to prepare additional information regarding alternatives for sale of the Eastwood Knoll subdivision to interested developers and to also obtain proposals from realton to market and sell the lots for the City. Following is a summary of the proposals received. • The proposal received fivm Orrin Thompson included a down payment of $50,000 with revenue generated from the sale of lots amounting to $629,000. This amount is $87,000 short of the $238,000 land value the City had hoped to recover Brom the project. • The proposal previously submitted by Vic Hellman was withdrawn. Staff researched the possibility of exchanging the Eastwood Knoll property for a 220 -acro site owned by Tony Emmerich, which could then be used as a sludge Page 6 (S) Council Minutes - 4/24!95 deposit site; however, it was found that only 60-80 acres of the site would be usable for sludge deposit. Therefore, no further efforts are underway to pursue this exchange. A proposal received from Tony Emmerich included a letter of credit equal to 25'% of the improvement cost, or approximately $104,000, as a guarantee. The purchase price would be $20,500 for each of the 33 lots, including a reduction of $1,500 for four lots needing additional grading, for total of $670,500. Emmerich also agreed to purchase a minimum of 5-7 lots each year. Proposals were received from four real estate companies regarding marketing the property. All four companies are able to provide the same services with some variation in terms of commission. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY TOM PERRAULT TO ACCEPT THE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY DALE FLOREK OF EDINA REALTY TO MARKET THE EASTWOOD KNOLL PROPERTY WITH A 1 -YEAR TERM. Motion carried unanimously. 16. Consideration of nurchasinit a eas detector fo3-the sewer denartment. Public Works Director John Simola reported that the City currently has two tri -gas detectors in the sewer department, which are also used by many other departments. Because some of the departments are without a unit for several days at a time, the Sewer and Water Superintendent is recommending that the City obtain an additional unit which will monitor four gases and will provide an additional level of safety for the workers. A quote in Lite aumwtl of $1,640 was received from Davies Water Equipment Company for the four -gas Neotronics meter. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY TOM PERRAULT TO AUTHORIZE THE PURCHASE OF THE NEOTRONICS FOUR -GAS METER FROM DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT COMPANY FOR $1,640. Motion carried unanimously. 17. Consideration of change order Nl for City Pmiect 93-04C. Public Works Facility Exuamion and Renovation. Phase Il. Public Works Director Simola reported that two changes are needed in construction of the public works facility expansion. The first change requires installation of slab supporta for the front and south entrances at a cost of $600. These supports were initially deleted Brom the plans during the redesign process, but it has been recommended that they be installed. The second change involves installation of a two - speed, three-phase heating and ventilation system and a 100 amp three-phase subpanel at a cost of $1,785. The bids received included a single -speed, single-phase unit, which is not available. The total coat of the change order is $2,268. Page 7 (�i) Council Minutes - 4/24/95 AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON TO APPROVE CHANGE ORDER 01 IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,265 FOR ADDING TWO ENTRY SLAB FOUNDATIONS AND SWITCHING THE HEATING AND VENTILATION SYSTEM FOR THE BAY AREA TO TWO -SPEED, THREE-PHASE. Motion carried unanimously. 18. Consideration of adopting a resolutiog authorizine Oe fire department to enter intoLk cooperative mutual aid agreement with other Wright County communities. Administrator Wolfsteller reported that each community in Wright County is being asked to consider adopting a resolution agreeing to join the Wright County Mutual Aid Association for joint and cooperative use of fire personnel and equipment. He noted that joining the Association does not increase the City's liability, and the new agreement will replace some of the present agreements now in place with other communities. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MONTICELLO JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE WRIGHT COUNTY MUTUAL AID ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT. Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 95-32. 19. Consideration of submitting a letter in response to the Buffalo Bituminous gravel njl BAW At the previous meeting of the City Council, township residents raised concerns regarding the proposed development of a gravel pit and bituminous plant operatiuu proposed by Buffalo Bituminous. The residents requested that the City send a letter to the County addressing concerns about the operation. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO APPROVE THE LETTER AS PROPOSED AND AUTHORIZED STAFF TO SEND THE LETTER TO WRIGHT COUNTY. Motion carried unanimously. 20. Consideration of modify the mileage reimbursement rate for Council and emvloveeR. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY TOM PERRAULT AND SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO LEAVE THE CURRENT MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT RATE FOR CITY COUNCIL AND CITY EMPLOYEES AT $.28 PER MILE. Motion carried unanimously. 21. Consideration of an ordinance amendment adopting 1994 baaildin code. Building Official Gary Anderson reported that ibr the past six years, the City has been using the 1988 Minnesota State Building Code as a guide lbr construction within the city. Anderson requested that Council consider adopting the 1994 Minnesota State Building Code. The most notable change is in residential construction requiring additional smoko dctcctors and 4inch spacing for dcck rv:ling construction. Page 8 0 Council Minutes - 4/24/95 AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY TOM PERRAULT AND SECONDED BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON TO TABLE THIS ITEM PENDING FURTHER STUDY. Voting in favor. Tom Perrault, Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf. Opposed: Brad Fyle. 22. Consideration of purchase of electric aretair (nlasma) cutter for the public works shot). Public Works Director John Simola reported that in the past the public works department has used an acetylene torch for cutting plate steel and aluminum, which often warps sheet steel, is slow, and results in edges having to be ground to St properly for welding. It is proposed that the public works department purchase an electric arc/air (plasma) cutter, which is faster and provides a smooth cut. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY TOM PERRAULT TO AUTHORIZE PURCHASE OF THE THERMAL ARC PAK MASTER 50 PLASMA CUTTER FROM CENTRAL MCGOWAN, INC., OF ST. CLOUD FOR $2,236.50. Motion carried unanimously. 23. Consideration of accenting bid and awarding project - Pathwav nroiect. City Engineer Bret Weiss reported that three bids were received on April 11, 1995, for the proposed pathway project. The lowest bid was received from Buffalo Bituminous in the amount of $406,076.55. The engineer's estimate for the project was $354,210. Weiss noted that the ISTEA program will fund 80% of the total coat of the project, including the 15% overrun over the estimate. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINE HERBST AND SECONDED BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON TO ACCEPT THE BIDS AND AWARD THE PROJECT TO BUFFALO BITUMINOUS IN THE AMOUNT OF $406,076.65. Motion carried unanimously. 24. Consideration of authorizing feasibility study - Meadow Oak 4th Addition. Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that the City recently received a petition requesting completion of a feasibility study for development of the Meadow Oak 4th Addition, which is located between the existing Meadow Oak area and the Briar Oakes development area, and consists of 12 platted Iota that currently do not have city sewer, water, or road services. He noted that one of the reasons why improvements were never completed is because a number of the lots are difficult to develop due to poor soils, swamp, low elevation, etc. O'Neill noted that staff is concerned that the pace of development in the city may overtax sanitary sewer plant resources and that, according to the City Attorney, the City is not obligated to complete the project via the public improvement process. In addition, Page 9 9 Council Minutes - 4/2M95 due to the late arrival of the application, the project was not included in the bond issue already adopted by the Council; therefore, the City would need to bond separately to acquire funds for the project, which would be expensive for such a small project. City Engineer Weiss added that the Army Corps of Engineers should be contacted to evaluate the wetlands in the area before authorizing this project. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY TOM PERRAULT TO TABLE THIS MATTER PENDING RECEIPT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. Motion carried unanimously. 26. Consideration of bills for the month of ADR1 AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO APPROVE THE BDI.S FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL AS PRESENTED. Motion Carried unanimously. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Karen Doty )Moe Manager Pegs 10 C;L) Council Agenda - 6/8/95 s. Public Hearina—C9nsidpratiop of vacating worm walqr pnd utift 2psen3ens on Lots9 and 10. Black 1. ThomasJELark Addition. which would allow Lots 9 and 10 to merge. W.O.) A- REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Morton Buildings is interested in constructing a facility on Lots 9 and 10, Block 1, Thomas Park Addition. In order to build the facility as proposed, the two lots must be merged into one. In order to merge the lots, the easements between the lots must be vacated. City staff has reviewed the site and finds no reason to deny the request. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve vacation of storm water and utility easement on Lots 9 and 10, Block 1, Thomas Park Addition, which would allow Lots 9 and 10 to merge. 2. Motion to deny approval of a request to allow the vacation of storm water and utility easement on Lots 9 and 10, Block 1, Thomas Park Addition, which would allow Lots 9 and 10 to merge. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative •1. Copy of plat map showing subject properties and easements to be vacated. THOMAS' PARK � "I i/ ��OJ moo^ �e0 ed yo 1 Y iqe �Ss.90 S4000 r I n,era,�e N��h�Or so �SSg, 69 , 1Y, en m Z 10 cc �; m �o ?+I ol ,n0 O ( MO N 12 L150.'O'O-.__1 150.00—•••1 o x DRIVE ! 0.00 1& 00 -- : o , . _ -' HIGO'W AY LOCATION MAP TROHAS PAU Lots 9 and 10 aae 1-94Tip I "PL. Cl RD Council Agenda - 6/8/95 6. Poxiddiarption of a request to svaiyq jnpudin-F Hermit [eels for a new hones bean¢ gonercted in liivQ; Mill for the Jacob WetterLing Foundation--Zaudtke Home Builders. (R.WJ A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: One of the new home builders within the River Mill development this summer will be Zaudtke Homes out of Brooklyn Park. This is their fust entry into the Monticello market; and as one of their first model home projects, they plan on building their model home with the intention of selling the home and donating the proceeds to the Jacob Wetterling Foundation. This is a project that Zaudtke Homes started last year in Brooklyn Park that generated approximately $60,000 in proceeds for the Jacob Wetterling Foundation. In a nutshell, Zaudtke Homes was the general contractor for the project and solicited donated materiels and donations of subcontractor labor, along with a reduced land value price, that enabled them to keep the construction costs at a minimum, allowing the $60,000 to be available for the ultimate donation to the Foundation. Since they are continuing with this idea in 1995, they would like their model home to be available for the fall Parade of Homes schedule and are requesting the City consider a contribution to the project by agreeing to waive the normal building permit fees for this home. The City of Brooklyn Park last year agreed to waive the building permit fees. Mr. Dean Zaudtke will be in attendance at the meeting to finiher explain the project to the Council. Some of you may have heard of this project last year, which apparently received tremendous support firom both suppliers of materials and from Zaudtke Home Builders' subcontractors. Mr. Zaudtke indicated that they were excited about doing the project again this year and picked Monticello as the site for this special home not only because of their involvement in River Mil:, but also because the home would be closer to St. Joseph, Minnesota, and the Wetterling family. B. AL Council could agree to participate in this worthwhile project by agreeing to waive all building permit fees associated with this house. It is my understanding the initial request is for waiving the building permit fees, and we did not discuss whether this would also apply to any other charges such as sewer and water hookup fees, sewer and water area charges, etc.P etc. 14 no not waive any Minding permit (eAR aasrrintM with 04 m. jest. Council Agenda - WM5 C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: From a public relations standpoint, I believe the staff is in agreement with the request for waiving of the building permit fees for this special project being spearheaded by Zaudtke Homes. With most of the materials and subcontractors donating their labor, it seems quite appropriate for the City in which this project is located to also waive the building permit fee. As I noted earlier, no request was made regarding other utility charges, and I assume that these would still have to apply to the project. D SUPPORTING DA,&: None. Council Agenda - 5M5 Qonsideration gf adopting an ordinance amendment or�yidline for Interim uses, Aoollicant. Jay Morrell. AND Conga j1eradoa of adopting an ordinance amendment epta�jishinw outside storage and interim use in I.1 and 1-2 zones. AoolicanL Jay tM nell. AND Considerati9P of granting an interim use _get mit tq @How oulkli jAe _q jgEWe and intVin use al Jot 2. B)jgp_15 8.Oakwood Inigstrial Park. Algnllcant. Jay Morrell. (J.0.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: See Planners report, Planning Commission draft meeting minutes, and supplemental information. B, ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Decision One—Conelderation of adopting an ordinance amendment providing for interim uses. L Motion to adopt an ordinance amendment providing for interim uses based on information contained within the planner's report. Under this alternative, a provision for allowing interim uses is established which creates the opportunity for establishing interim uses for each zoning district on a case-by-case basis. See Planner's report for rationale supporting this choice. 2. Motion to deny establishment of an ordinance providing for interim uses based on the finding that establishment of an interim use provision is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan. If Council selecta this alternative, then decisions two and twee become moot. Decision Two --Consideration of adopting an ordlnenae amendment establishing outside storage and interim use in I.1 and 1.2 zones. 1. Motion to adopt an ordinance amendment establishing outside storage as an interim use in an I.2 zone based on information contained within the planner's report and based on the finding that the storage of trucks and trucking equipment in the I.2 district is appropriate as a temporary use of property until such time as the highest and best use of the property dictates otherwise. Council Agenda - 5W5 An interim use approach would permit the City to control the secondary effects of outdoor storage, as well as to work with the property owner toward the eventual cessation of the storage and a permanent use of the property. Under this alternative, a provision for allowing outside storage in an I-2 zone is established which creates the opportunity for M & P Transport to store materials on vacant property on an interim basis. 2. Motion to deny adoption of an ordinance amendment establishing outside storage as an interim use in an I-2 zone. Council should select this alternative based on a finding that establishing outside storage in an I-2 zone is not consistent with the comprehensive plan and would become a detriment to the district due to the inconsistency of the use with the character of the I-2 district. Decision Three -Consideration of granting an interim use permit to allow outside storage and interim use at Lot 2, Block a Oakwood Industrial Park. Motion to grant an interim use permit to allow outside storage as an interim use at Lot 2, Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park, under the conditions as identified by the Planning Commission. Motion is based on the finding that the proposed interim use is consistent with the comprehensive plan and the character of the area in which it is proposed. The interim use must conform to the following conditions. 1. The interim use must conform to requirements as identified by ordinance. 2. The term of the interim use is five years from the date of approval. 3. The front yard setback for the storage area shall be at mid- point on the property (sppro: 300 R). The side yard setback shall be 30 it 4. Materials shall be stored as far to the rear of the site as possible. Motion to deny approval of the interim use request. Q.STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission and staff recommend alternative 91 under decisions one through three. D, SUPPORTING DATA Planners report; Proposed ordinance amendment establishing interim use provision; Proposed ordinance amendment establishing outside storage as an interim use in an I.2 zone. FPR -13-1955 1602 WIC 61Z 555 5637 Fl. WS/ 12 KA Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. C URBAN PLANNING • DESIGN . MARKET RESEARCH MEMORANDUM TO: Jeff O'NeW FROM: liWwd MctAuOWSmphen Gd=an DATE: 13 April 1995 RE. MOntiaIIo - Interim Use Ordmmm FIM NO: 191.06 - 95.03 BACKGROUND AND Rffi+F3LENC6 Recently. the City has been approached by a laadoaoer (MrSW Moaelp to allcw the amp of trucks and ttailen on an mdostdal parcel u a pdmIcipl use of property. The Taring Ordina= does not t mudy have such a use, and the highest and best use of this parcel is Clearly a more unease fadaanisl unw. However, a specific use may be appmpdate for a limkted time until the attimane use Can be realize& Thls memorandum will aatllne the Cddcal fm2m which carinal interim uses and allow for their effecdve implemmration ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIM Control Condmana. the City of Mnn ictUo Zoning Ordbmm does not have any stated oondideaa fbr interim uses wtddn spedfle zonW dimfas. A teeeat mgaert by a landowner of an WdastrW parcel to use the land for odor thm the petmimed or cotWhiamal uses spetdflod brought to the attention of the City the posdhitity of scoozzustodidn uses of Ind an a temporary basis. U it an be shown tbat the no was not wtth the aro of smnxmdb:g Properties, or catdNcr with the long term ,., •..,,,.,,. , bhtetesrs specified by the City's C=Wmbmdve Plan, an interim ase approach may be eppropaI— ID light of the roceat request, the City o Wd choose to deny the apptia"m permit the use thwugh an ordWaaro amemdm— or b=Kk= interim uses. Tbls refit„ s an amid— to the Zoning Ordinance, t md&:&Uy the Aftfalstmdost section, and ythe Badnew Dludct Provislam section, Subd. 16, I-2, Heavy lr4istrW, to Include ..... criteria regudLog the implemm adon of interim uses. 5775 Wayzata Blvd • StAte 555 • SL LOUS Park, MN 55416 • (612) 595-9836•Fax. 595.9837 Purpose and Intent. The underlying purpose of allowing a specific use within a desigm2md zoning district is to ensure the owner of a spedflc parcel, neighbotmg property owners, and the City, a predictable level of activity and impact expected from use of that specific patzeL Par this reason, no uses are allowed other than those specified by the Zoning Ordinance as permitted, accessory, or conditional. On occasion, however, the City may discover ceztam uses for a propeay which an temporary in nature, serve a specific function in a designated location, and offer lade, if any, demmeutil effects to ndghboatng landowners. In the pan of a particular use on a sped8c property amt a permanent bxadon for that use can be found, or a use which will be rplaced with anticipated development or redevelopment eodorming to the permitted, =essory, or conditional ares of the zoning distant, or a use reflective of the long range development goals of the arra, allowing that use on a temporary basis may be a beneficial development strategy. In mch cases. all paries recogmae the temporary oato of mcb a use, and that at —f -don of the hued- =a permit, the specified use will u miaam, mku otherwise reinstated by the City. P rocedwre and Cvenaml Standuds. With regard to processing of interim use permits, them are two conditions which apply. The first is a' ring' condition, in which an adsdsg legal or legal non-eoaforming in -dm use is caaaidewd allowable and treated wom ing to the esisdng standards and as an interim nae in a speeii$ed zoning district The second condition is wbrm a new interim use, allowable in the zoning daft as sack, is applied for. Under inch a dwatian the application is processed similar to the pmoodrua and standards asmdated with a condidoul use permit to ensure the integrity of the ase in the specified zoning d rilct and that the use will not impose any additional btudea on the City or neighboring proper Teminatina. Perbaps the most dgaiflcam component of an interim use is its specified taminatioa Without a tuuminadon dare, a specified land use is understood to be pesmanmt, whether It is a permitted or conditional use in the dlsudcc h may be that a vidatlm of the nae permit candirian•. a change in the City's Zoning Ordinance, or redevdopmem of the ase property reader the Interim use permit tamitsated 1 ft the spedfied terminadon dna. However, baring such conditions, the property owner can aspect the inter}- me permit to expire on a specified date. At that time, =timed acdvity an such a property would be considered nornonfotming and possibly ifiegel, unless otherwise specM by the City. Interim Un in an Industrial Zoning Dhtdct. The City of MnadaAo is caTeady eouddedng a request by a landowner to provide outdoor suaaage of Wieb and trucking egtripm— on a parcel zoned for iaduatrtal davelopmcat. Tb adQten this mquest, as well u nay when evhloh may be applied to the I-2 Zoning District. the fisadamnotal purpose of the z0ft dhnrlct -net be preserved. The timdamemal purpose of the I-2 Diana is to prwido building sines for heavy brmusnial activity removed froom the leas intensive activity of residemtW and commercial land Mm Outdoor storage of vehicles and owes= dna not constba the higbest and bat use of this property. However, became a vscart iodoste al lot may be the most appropriate Plato to stone vchicla and equipment until a more suitable site is located, an imerim use permit for this purpose may be considered a desirable alternative to leaving the land vacant until an industrial building and use is proposed for the rice. An interim use permit for autdoctr storage of trucks and trucking cgnipmeat ahoald include the following moons: 1. The permit.would ld be amended to the property owner for a of yenta agreed upon by the landowner and the City under a development contract At cerminaticn, the landowner may apply for another races- on permit however, both the landowner and the City will be regrmed to assess the ....� ...r ..-.j Contest of the application and demonim whether gating another h—Im use permit Is is the best: interest of the City and neighboring propatq owners. 2. The fates- use permit would require the appliaot to mat the applicable of Chapter 3, Sectio 2, Ckenaal Building and Pedumaoce Requirements, atmitar to the requfrezu= necessary to receive a conal use permit In this district. 3. 'rhe Interim use permit would include as a condition of approval prob2tting pairing of miles. 4. The interim use permit would require a gravel unface, suitable far outdoor storage, and teioforeing the temporary nature of the use on this she. S. The interim use permit would require visual screening in complianeo with Cbapter 3, Section 2.G of the Zoning Ordinance regarding fencing, la g, and screening. Of particular sigoitieance is the screeaing's opacity and use of as 1 phtndng as a component of the craning. The ermem of the screening and necessary investment by the landowner should be at the disc:tft of the City. However, aha conditions agreed upon shwld be documented as a oompoora of tffi issued pewit. 6. The interim use permit would require any faxing and storage of trucm ad equipment to comply with the seft& conditions of C:hapoer 3, Section 3 of the City's Zamiog Ordicaum For the 'I-2' Zoning D4tdct, all fencing and storage dmU bave a 30 foot mhrisnem tion[ and :ear yard sesback sad 30 font minimum We yard suuback L The eamdidoua mumu above apply to the �adfic use of -Ic ,1 shuage Lor truxd<a and trucking equipment If the City finds there are other types of storap tun to be included in thin section, specific conditions may be required of them as well. Howaver, the gc=ml inamt of bmwiiag visually attractive, am"bausive land uses wlddn the industrial diffiet abonld be Pf R-13-1555 1603 NX bl d » 5wf r. ors iz CONCLUSION In response to the City of Monticello's interest in euabHshing an interim = compown: to their Zo�ag Ordinance, our office has lofted such an or 11 -P P. This atdinaza seeps to awdc}pau ... � of the City to acwmmodate special conditions which wattsat an interim use permit, while at the am time ant>dpatin potential adverse effects of such uses ors the diudct in which they act: allowed. The City should estahlisb the of the izae use permit procedure, stleh that h tetim um may be htc>oded m individual zoning districts when the teed or denim is warmed. Under the City's Zoning Ordinance, the Planning Commission is to consider five betas in its consideradca of an ame'IIdrutstt The Planning Coon fs to then maim a finding of Let and .........,..,t . ,.,. to the City Council regarding the proposed a The }live facmrs are as follows: L Belath�lp to the C...... Pbm The interim use of outdoor amp for trucks and nttdotng equipm, if it a&= to the conditions described in the ordinance, will nrppott the it1puflon d the Cave Plan to maintain an attractive, functional 1-%-4a1 pas! in Mooduilo. 2. Geographic area involved in the request. The outdoor storage of uacb and tracking egaipmem is oommAle with the oedioary D activities of the ird—Hal pads In which the hmedm use is proposed. J. Tendency of the proposal to depredate the aces. It is highly uWamly that the proposed use followhV required camp fortppmd wM depreciate the vahm of adghbctdng properties in the Z-2', Savy Irtda-421 Unto District 4. Chasrds of the surramiliq atm. The locadoa for the proposed iatedta ase hu the frock acd ty and amemomy aaMoor am:age typical of fm�al p *L The btcbWm of in an is typical of induttfal pules. The forlodon of as outdoor smogs pity dedicsoed to tmcb and truddmg equipment is highly =op ffhle with the character of the ma. S. r ......... i nand for the use, The landowner has did an fnaAdw area an the edstog lot bdng used fir tauldog business activity. Therefore. addidamd Lend hr stooge of track and mteklog equdpmesr would allow Santer utility of the landowmers lot with a pmotmod use. 4 RPR -13-1955 1603 NFC bu» zji r. ww ac In reviewing the request by Mr. Morrell, the City has three options for response: First, the City may choose to deny the regacst� ismiag a findings of fact which sinter the proposed no is not in the best interest of the City or adjacent bndownen. The City may d—r-1— that it is in their best ino test to ptusae a pemtaaeat use and banding development program for the property, and to leave the land vacant until such time a pezzaffied or rnadittoaal land use is prtrposed. Second. the City may choose to define the proposed use as a penaimed or conditional use in the Z-2' Zamtg District, fanning a fiediogs of fact which states the proposed ase Is desimble and non-obtsative in this distzict an a perm basis. Ile City may determine that the storage of troch and trucking cod== is compatible with the taduandal cituacter of the district and d=cfcae in the bast interest of the City, titin use any be classified as permitted at coronal. Finally, the City may choose to dc9ine the riegoea as an fated- no in the 11-21, Ill District. In this case, the namiag clasmiczihra world accommodate a WNW . .., of temporary namm This action would have the effect of pe>mitdng a use on a property which would ordinarily remain vacant until a permaacec use could be eaahlidwA More Vociffcalty, the potential to use a site in an established iadaatial district for the storage of trxIm and mucking eguipatem„ would .....:._.-5.- the temporary needs of the landowner without providing adverse impacts to the City or adjacent laadowtaa. it i, the L,'. - of our office to adopt an oedimnce which permits interim uses in zoning dist>Irts, provided they are developed and maintained for nonrobtruda activities. In addidam, our office ., the inclusion of outdoaz sooage for tracks and trucking equipment as an Interim use in the '1-2', Heavy Industrial Zoning District. To this end, we have provided a Draft Onlinacce to three sections for the City's review. 'he first action amends the title of Chsptm 22 of the MoadceIIo Zoning Ord matte to kma'trde Interim Uses. The second sectiom amends Cktapter 22 to luclude the administradon of interim uses accaniing to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. The third section smtatds Chfpoer 16. '1- 2-, Reavy Industrial District standards to include outdoor storaga of treys ad wzkb g equipment. and the mnditiOas under which it may be approved. It is our ktrtearicm by providing tho previous Imre discussion and the iia Ordb= that the City of Momticdlo will have the aearsary info n by which an dlective P maybe delivered to Mr. Marell's request ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN THAT THE MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE BE AMENDED TO INCLUDE AN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS PROVIDING FOR INTERIM USE PERMITS AS FOLLOWS: THE I TL.E OF CHAPTER 22 OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE SHALL BE AMENDED TO READ: Administration - Amendments, Conditional Use Permits, and Interim Use Permits SECTION 88.4, INTERIM USE PERMIT, SHALL BE ADDED TO CHAPTER 22, ADMINISTRATION - AMENDMENTS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND INTERIM USE PERMITS, OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE TO READ AS FOLLOWS: 22.4: INTERIM USE PERMIT [A] PURPOSE AND INTENT: The purpose and intent of allowing interim uses is: To allow a use for a brief period of time until a permanent location is obtained or while the permanent location is under construction. To allow a use that is presently judged acceptable by the City Council but that, with anticipated development or redevelopment, will not be acceptable in the future or will be replaced in the future by a permitted or conditional use allowed within the respective district. To allow a use which is reflective of anticipated long-range change to an area and which is in compliance with the comprehensive plan provided that said use maintains harmony and compatibility with surrounding uses and is in keeping with the architoctural character and design standards of existing uses and development. [B] PROCEDURE: Existing Uses: Uses defined as interim uses which presently exist as a legal use or a legal nonconforming use within a respective zoning district shall be considered approved and shall be treated as allowable uses. — 7 -?F Ordinance Amendment No. Page 2 2. New Uses: Uses defined as interim uses which do not presently exist within a respective zoning distract shall be processed according to the standards and procedures for a conditional use permit as established by Chapter 22 of this ordinance. [C] GENERAL STANDARDS: An interim use shall comply with the following: 1. Existing Uses: Shall be in conformance with zoning and building standards in effect at the time of initial construction and development and shall continue to be governed by such regulations in the future. 2. New Uses: a. Meets the standards of a conditional use permit set forth in Section 22-3 of this chapter. b. Conforms to the applicable performance standards set forth in Chapter 3, Section 2, of this zoning ordinance. C. The use is allowed as an interim use in the respective zoning district. d. The date or event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty. e. The use will not impose additional costa on the public if it is necessary for the public to take the property in the future. f. The user agrees to any conditions that the City Council deems appropriate for permission of the use. [D) TERMINATION: An interim use shall terminate on the happening of any of the following events, whichever first occurs: 1. The date stated in the permit. 2. Upon violation of conditions under which the permit was issued. 3. Upon change in the City's zoning regulations which renders the use nonconforming. 6-- 9G Ordinance Amendment No. Page 3 4. The redevelopment of the use and property upon which it is located to a permitted or conditional use as allpwed within the respective zoning district SECTION 16.8, DMM M USES, SHAILL BE ADDED TO CHAPTER 1% "1-2; HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, TO READ AS FOLLOWS: 16.6: INTERIM USES: The following are interim uses in an "1-2' District (requires an interim use permit head on the procedures set forth in and regulated by Chapter 22 of this ordinance): [A] Outdoor storage of trucks and trucking equipment, provided that: 1. A specified termination date is documented 2. The applicable requirements of Chapter 3, Section 2, General Building and Performance Requirements, are met. 3. The permit prohibits the parking of automobiles. 4. The permit specifies a gravel surface, suitable for the parking of trucks. b. The permit specifies that the intensity of visual screening shall be related to the location and nature of the storage and the duration of the interim use. 6. The permit specifies that appropriate setback of necessary fencing and/or setback of storage shall be related U the location and nature of the storage and the duration of the interim use. Adopted by the Monticello City Council ori the 8th day of May, 1996. Mayor City Administrator Planning Commission Minutes - 3/07/95 piecuss "Offsite outside storaee in I-1 and 1-2 zones. At the previous meeting, the commission tabled action providing specific direction to Jay Morrell with regard to designing an ordinance amendment that would allow off-site outside storage in an industrial zone. Jeff O'Neill, Assistant Administrator, explained the different approaches for the commission to review. 1. Adopt an ordinance that allows outside storage to occur as a conditional use in an I-2 zone (currently it is allowed only as an accessory use). 2. Adopt an ordinance amendment that allows outside storage as an accessory use on a parcel other than the parcel on which the principal use is occurring. 3. Adopt an ordinance that allows outside storage as an interim use. 4. Other alternatives the Commission may decide upon. 5. The Planning Commission may decide that the ordinance is fine the way it is an reject the notion of providing any guidnna+ to Morrell to assist him in designing an amendment to the code. Under this alternative, Morrell would prepare a zoning ordinance amendment for review at the next meeting of the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission would review and make recommendations to Council for review at the Bret meeting of the City Council in March Enforcement action would be initiated at such time that the Council acts to deny the ordinance amendment necessary to legally support Morrell's use of the land. Enforcement action has been delayed based on the advice of the City Attorney. It is his view that the City should first determine whether or not to change the ordinance to allow the use before taking le action. He has noted that the culmination of the legal action will occur after the decision on the zoning ordinance amendment is made; therefore, it would be premature to take legal steps at this time. Steve Grittman, City Planner, explained that it is possible to change the ordinance in just one district. The Commission could allow interim use in the industrial areas only. The city ordinance does not handle this as parking because trailers are storage - they cannot be driven away. Planning Commission Minutes - 3/07/96 Jay Morrell, owner of M & P Transport, stated he did not know if storage of trailers would be storage or parking. Morrell thought a conditional use permit with stipulations such as screening, would be acceptable. The problem with an interim permit would be the time limit. The time the storage will be needed is not known because the economy will dictate the expansion of the business. The commission discussed the advantages and disadvantages of using conditional use permits verses interim permits. The interim permits could work well because a time limit could be used to end the use. This type of permit has been legal for four years and are typically used for non- conforming uses. There vas some concern that the permit would be hard to revoke. With the conditional use permits, conditions can be attached but these conditions would need to be enforced by the dty. If violated the ordinance states that violations of conditional use permits are treated as misdemeanors and would need to be handled by the sheriff office. RICHARD CARLSON MADE A MOTION TO DIRECT STAFF TO ASSIST JAY MORRELL IN PREPARING HIS APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT THAT WOULD ALLOW OFF SITE STORAGE IN AN I-2 ZONE. SECONDED BY DICK MARTDE. Motion passed unsinirn usly. Planning Commission Agenda - 2/7/95 8 . Consideration of alternatives for 4gvelooment of a zoning ordinance ®b amendment that would allow vehicle storage or narking at a location other than the princinal use. Analicant. Jav Morrell. (J.OJ A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: A few weeks ago, City staff discovered that Jay Morrell, owner of M & P Transport, was parking/storing vehicles and trailers on property recently purchased from the Oakwood Partnership. The lot purchased for vehicle parking is located some distance from the M & P offices or "principal use." This practice is not allowed under our current ordinance. Under the current ordinance, parking and/or storage is allowed as an accessory use. An accessory use is not allowed without a principal use. In other words, parking lots and storage areas cannot be developed without an associated business operation on the same site. Morrell was notified of the violation accordingly. In response to the notification, Morrell has requested that the City consider amending the zoning ordinance in a manner that would allow storage to occur at a location other than the location of the principal use. Morrell has not offered a specific ordinance amendment because there are a number of approaches that could be made to accomplish Morrell's goal. It, therefore, makes sense to review the various approaches with the Planning Commission to determine the best approach prior to submittal of a formal application request for a zoning ordinance amendment. Planning Commission will be provided with a verbal report fiiom Steve Grittman regarding possible alternatives for development of zoning ordinance amendments that would allow storage nr parking of vehicles at a location other than the principal use. Jay Morrell will be applying for an ordinance amendment based on the Planning Commission conversation and discussion of the matter. Following are different approaches that will be reviewed at the meeting in more detail. Adopt an ordinance that allows outside storage to occur as a conditional use in an I-2 zone (currently it is allowed only as an accessory use). Adopt an ordinance amendment that allows outside storage as an accessory use on a parcel other than the parcel on which the principal use is occurring. Planning Commission Agenda - 2/7/95 Adopt an ordinance that allows outside storage as an interim use. Under this alternative, an ordinance amendment would need to be developed that would allow short-term or interim use of land in a manner that is not consistent with the zoning ordinance. Morrell would be allowed to use the property for storage for a limited number of years and be required to screen the storage area. 4. Other alternatives??? Planning Commission may decade that the ordinance is fine the way it is and reject the notion of providing any guidance to Morrell to assist him in designing an amendment to the code. Under this alterative, Morrell would prepare a zoning ordinance amendment for review at the nest meeting of the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission would review and make recommendation to Council for review at first meeting of the City Council in March. Enforcement action would be initiated at such time that the Council acts to deny the ordinance amendment necessary to legally support Morrell's use of the land. Please note that enforcement action has been delayed based on the advice of the City Attorney. It is his view that the City should first determine whether or not to change the ordinance to allow the use before taking legal action. He has noted that the culmination of the legal action will occur after the decision on the zoning ordinance amendment is made; therefore, it would be premature to take legal steps at this time, Planning Commission is asked to review Grittman'e report and the options above and provide Morrell with guidance as to development of a zoning ordinance amendment. The ordinance amendment would be reviewed at the meeting in March. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff has no firm recommendation at this time. Me do believe that the existing ordinances limiting off-site storage and perking are important. Changes to it should not be taken lightly. P. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of all correspondence with Jay Morrell regarding this situation. 250 Eau Broadway P. O. Box 1147 Mondcdlo, MN 55362-9245 Phone•. (612) 295-2711 Meso: (((66fi12)) 333.-55773399 Fax f1Ir1 2Jay MomII MP Transport Boz 477 1401 Fallon Avenue Monticello, UN 86362-0477 RE: Storage of Semi -Trailers on Block 3. Lot 2 Oakwood Industrial Paris Addition. City of Monticello Dear Mr. Morrell. December 22, 1994 I noticed today that you have created a driveway aeesse to Lot 2 and as currently storing some semi- trailers in the back southeast earner dBlock 3, Lot 2, Oakwood Industrial Park Addition in the City of Monticello. The use of this lot for outside storage of these semi -Hailers in not an allowable use within the zoning district do;mation far this lat,1.2 (heavy industrial) zoning without a prindple use, that being some type of a building. If a building was constructed there first then outside storage is only allowed as a conditional use in the 1-2 (heavy industrial) zoning. You have two options with regards to addressing this matter. They an as follows; Remove the ettatina ssmi-Hailers and remove the culvert for the driveway with a fill material over it. This wont is to be completed within 10 days upon receipt of this letter or this matter will be toned over to the City Attorney fbr 8uther action. Submit a completed appllcadoo fbr an mdtnsnee amendment to allow oataide storsgs in an I.2 (heavy in fas riM zoning a an allowable an without a prindple ass, (a building atroeta7) on the sits Use of the property fbr outside storage would depend an the results of the seting ordinance amendment Prate Remove the ezLstinQ semi -t ailats and remove the calwQt for the driveway with a fill material over iL 'lois worst is to be completed within 30 days upon receipt of this letter or this matter will be tuned aver to the City Attorney fbr author action. Mr. Jay Morrell December 2' 1994 Page 2 B. Develop a principal ase on site and sambit a fequa for a omdidonel use permit allowing open and outside atnuge. In omajmedou wfih prepartion and review of building pleas. submit an applimden ihr a e1 we request to allow open and outdoor starega in an I-2 ihsarf iadussriaA sorts. Also, The metal culvert which is cmtewJy placed in the rWa-d-wsy for the drivsavq sso ess to this lot mast meet City design criteria. You wiIl have 10 days aeon receipt of this Jetty to remove the --;sd sad4:alen and the metal culvert with the fill material over it Pram Block 9. Lot 2, Oakwood Iadnetrial Penh A,ddifina in the City of Montleello. Failure to remove both Sam this lot will rank to turning thb math ova to the City Attorney for @anther --d— If yon, should have any gaeatl-as ple" feel Pas to contact ma Sincerely. CITY OF MONTICELLO �GA ee Rick Wolbuiler, City Administrator Jeff O'Neill. Assistant City A John Simols, Public Works Directar Paul Weingarde4 City AMn-xwy Brat Weiss, City &agfn-a Brad Pyle. Mgyor 0 Ll D M U�190 144 N A P TPAtSPBAT. OIC December 27. 1994 M 3 P TRANSPORT, INC. Phone -(810 2930122 MKM - (810 =4740 Pax .(612) 3M?, 8 ALEXANDRIA CONCRETE CO. Phone -(612) 763}a800 Fox . (6121 7115-4676 Gary Anderson, Zoning Administrator City of Monticello 290 East Broadway PO Box 1147 Monticello, MN 33362-9245 O]N6AEIE PRODUCTS OF N6N LONDON. INC. PMM • (812) 0SA,7911 CONCRETE OF MORRIS, INC. Play - (MZ 6n4M wADERA READY -MDI Pinna - 08)611.1338 Fax -(614761./676 I am in receipt of your letter dated December 22, 1994 regarding our use of Block 3, Lot 2. Oakwood Industrial Park. I am in disagreement with you regarding your interpretation. We are now a current building owner in the Industrial Park which we occupy and I feel we are in compliance to the current ordinances. I also believe if you were to check the minutes of past meetings you will find that I have received permission to store trailers outside the facility. However, since you have raised an issue we would very much like to comply with all of your wishes. Therefore, please send us an application of ordinance amendment form as you have suggested in 18. I would also ask that the City loin me in this reQuest since it would obviously promote and encourage expansion within the Oakwood Industrial Park. S *rely, VK aye oil l JCM 1 j e cc$ Flick Wolfsteller, City Administrator Jeff O'Neill, Assistance City Administrator John Simola. Public Works Director Paul Weingorden, City Attorney Brat Weiss. City Engineer Brad Fyle, Mayor C7- 0) e A P TFARO r. otG AUMAM M COSCOm CO. Wa00M RU PaoesMmM I OF 010 d Ix UNCIR �IId. P.O. 1102 477 P.O. max the P.O. am as 1711th Nay. 0 N.6. 12M Pedeo Avenue 4140Adtaft MN tm AIexandit MN 66]00 Vvodana MN 26169 IM Aa2002. lel W" Moon. MN 26267 Z50 Ent Broadway P. O. Box 1147 MondmUo, MN 55362-9145 Phone (612) 295-2711 Meso: (612) 333-5739 Fax: (612) 295-4404 Jay 0. Morrell M & P Transport, Inc. PO Boz 477 Monticello MN 68362 Dear Jay Morrell: Enclosed is the rezoning application you requested- Please complete the application and return the application and the $260.00 to City Hall by January 20th, 1996. The Planning Cammissioa wffl meet on February, 7th, 1998. 1f you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, CITY OF MONTICELLO 07r&x4 .D Jeff O'Neill Assistant Administrator JO/Wk Endosure cc: File 7-9-P ■ A P TNAIRPOAT, O1G January 6, 1995 N & P TRANSPORT, INC. Phone - (612) 2MI22 Nwm • (e1 Z1 rn.740 Fa - (612) 772.2]68 ALWHORLA CONCRETE CO. Phone - 7634=(812) 7e7r Fax • (612) 76349M Jeff Q*Neill, Assistant Administrator City of. Monticello 250 East Broadway PO Box 1147 Monticello, PIN 53362 CONCRETE PRODUCTS OF NEIN LONDON, INC. Peon.. (612) 756-2311 CONCRETE OF KOIW , INC. Phone . (rotor see-= WADENA READY- IIX 1 Phone - (218) 0/•1558 Fez - (619 763,WM In regards to our recent correspondents regarding my ordinances, would you please send to me, complete any and all ordinances that would apply to the rezoning application the City is requesting. If you have any questions please give ms a call. Sincereelly�,,,•Un r J $-� y C. Morrell M al P Transport JCM1Je r A P TRANSPUT. M, MOArOW CO 01=11 CL WAOONI P W4MX I6mm IML NEWP.O. hoz 477 P.O. am 6M P.O. an M 11660 Nq. D NA &ADMX W MW 63702 Alezrdit UN SAM a/aam YN sun Nw uz10o4 MN am M �otlatm ec 1XV ►8030 YOnr. MN 8237 Council Agenda - 6/8/95 to. Considerallonyf or000sal f mm Buchen Enyimpmental Services for inflow pnd infiltration reduction for the sanitary sewer collection svetem. W.S.) X REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The recently -completed Facilities Plan for our wastewater treatment plant expansion discusses infiltration and inflow into our sanitary sewer collection system. Infiltration is generally described as pound water entering our collection system through cracks, crevices, or openings in our pipe and/or manholes. Inflow is described generally as a direct passage of rainwater or storm water into our system. This can come from sump pumps, cross connections, foundation drains, etc. '!hese two together are called I & 1. The Environmental Protection Agency defines the term excessive infiltration, and the definition has changed in the past ten years. Excessive infiltration is identified by a quantity of flow more than 120 gallons per person per day domestic base flow and infiltration. Excessive infiltration is also defined as that amount of infiltration which can be economically and effectively eliminated from the sewer system as determined through a cost- effective analysis. Excess inflow means the maximum total flow rate during storm events which results in chronic operational problems related to the hydraulic overloading of our treatment plant that totals more than 260 gallons per person per day. This includes domestic base flow plus infiltration plus inflow. Information in the Facilities Plan shows that our systemwide infiltration and inflow are less than those determined excessive. Based upon both state and federal guidelines, further investigation for regulatory purposes is unnecessary; we simply need to build the wastewater treatment plant big enough to handle the peak hourly wet weather flow and the peak instantaneous wet weather flow. This was essentially the recommendation when the treatment plant was upgraded in 1880—just build the treatment plant large enough to handle the extra flow and install enough pumps to move it around. This did not create a significant problem during construction, as the treatment plant was totally funded through federal, state, and revenue sharing funds; but the 60 pumps at the treatment plant were costly to operate. We paid for moving the additional water around the plant through higher operational costs. If one refers to Table 2.12 on Page 2.28 of the Facilities Plan, you can see the table for design flows for the year 2020. The plant will be designed to handle an average dry weather flow of 1.82 million gallons per day, an average wet weather flow of 1.118 million gallons per day, but a peak hourly Council Agenda - 518/95 wet weather flow of 4.82 million gallons per day, and a peak instantaneous wet weather flow of 5.19 million gallons per day. To state it simply, if we can remove I & I from our sanitary sewer collection system, our plant can be smaller and less costly to operate. With a proposed $11 million expenditure for the project and $.5 million per year operation and maintenance coats, one can see that the I & I problem warrants additional investigation even if it isn't deemed excessive. There is a company that specializes in inflow and infiltration reduction programa. Private property plays a significant role in the generation of I & I with sump pumps, foundation drains, and leaky service linea. Buchen Environmental recognizes this and addresses it in their plan of action. Craig Anderson is the Marketing Manager for Buchen Environmental Services. Craig has worked with the City in the past and played an instrumental role with PSG in drafting the original operation and maintenance manuals for the City's wastewater treatment plant in 1980. After that, Craig worked with the City inspecting portions of our sewer collection system while he was with Visu Sewer. I have asked Mr. Anderson to prepare a preliminary proposal for you to review and to have him present his proposal at the May 8, 1995, Council meeting. His firm takes a rather comprehensive approach to the reduction of I & I, and such a program can range from $60,000 to $80,000 for a city the size of Monticello, depending upon what role the City plays throughout the program. Current City Ordinances, specifically Chapter 7, Section 2, Paragraph 15, states that storm water is not permitted in the sanitary sower system and it is unlawful for any owner, occupant, or user of any premises to allow that water to enter the sanitary sewer system. It is another matter, however, to inspect the 1,600+ connections in the community to find out which ones are discharging clear water into our system and to have the ordinances in place and incentives in place to have this clear water directed away ftum our system, even though it could mean plumbing and/or sewer service repair costs for homeowners. The Council is asked to give Mr. Anderson time to explain his proposal and what his firm can do to assist us with their I & I reduction program. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: The first alternative, after review of the proposal and presentation by Buchen Environmental Services, is to direct staff to negotiate a contract with this firm fbr specific tasks and the coats associated with those tasks. Council Agenda - 5/&95 The second alterative would be to table action on the I & I reduction proposal until a future meeting. 3. The third alternative would be to do nothing at this time. C• STAFF R.ECONQ�NDATION: It is the recozrmendation of the Public Works Director and City Administrator that we develop an I & I reduction program with the assistance of Buchen Environmental Services as outlined in alternative pl. The short period of time we have makes utilizing City staff not possible; I believe we will need major input and assistance from a firm such as Suchen Environmental Services. I have spoken with Jim Kangus, our contract building official from Paul Waldron & Associates, and Gary Anderson about us performing the individual home and business inspections ourselves. Jim has had experience in the past doing these and has done over 300 of them He indicated it takes an additional person to schedule appointments and handle phone calls regarding missed appointments, and many people cancel their appointments without noti&ing the inspector. In many cases, you end up going back to the same house two or three times. Jim and Gary would not have time to do this over the next few months, and it appears that Jim's firm may not be able to provide any individual to do this either. Consequently, the proposal frrom Buchen Environmental Services may be our best approach to our I & I reduction program inspections. D. SUPPORTING DATA Copy of current ordinance regarding storm water; Copy of proposal from Suchen Environmental Services (included under separate cover). 7-2-12: LIABILITY FOR REPAIRS: After the initial connection has been made to the curb stop or the sewer lead, the applicant, owner, or the occupant or user of such premises shall be liable for all repairs required to any water, sanitary or storm sewer lines necessary for connection of the premises to the street main, including any necessary street repairs. (6/8/81, 6101) 7-2-13: INSTALLATION OF CONNECTIONS: All connections to the water system and sanitary sewer system shall be performed by a plumber licensed to do plumbing in the city, except that nothing in this chapter shall be construed as to prohibit an individual owner from obtaining a permit and installing such connection by his own labor, provided, however, that said construction is conducted under the regulations of this chapter and requirements of the engineer and plumbing inspector. 7-2-14: CITY NOT LIABLE: The City shall not be held liable at any time for any deficiency or failure in the supply of water to the customer whether the same be occasioned by shutting off the water for repair or connections or for any cause whatever. L7-2-15: STORM WATER NOT PERMITTED IN SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: It shall be unlawful for any owner, occupant, or user of anymises to direct into or allow any storm water or surface water orer from air conditioning systems to drain into the sanitary sewer tem of the city. 7-2-16: EXCAVATION WORK AND TESTING OF METERS: (A) All installation work or repair of connections to the water and sewer systems, including grades, bends, and backfilling, shall be performed under the direction and supervision of the plumbing inspector. No work shall be covered or backfilled until directed by said inspector. All work and excavations shall be protected by barricades and warning markers and lights reasonable and suitable to the purpose. The City shall be held harmless of any claim or loss as might otherwise arise for damage, loss, or injury caused by or arising by reason of such work being performed; and the applicant causing such work to be done shall give undertaking to the City with respect thereto. 7-2-17: EMERGENCY REGULATIONS: The Council may impoeo emergency regulations pertaining to the conservation of water by resolution of the Council and by giving notice by publication or by posting in the City Hall and at such public places as the Council may direct. 7-2-18: RIGHT TO ENTER LAND: The City by any authorized employee or agent shall have the right to enter and be admitted to any lands and property in the city for the purpose of inspection of materials, plumbing work, and fixtures of all kinds used by or in connection with the water and sower systems. MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE VII/Chet 2/Pe 88 CCA A Council Agenda - 6/8/95 i i . consideration of p request for re5onsideng#on of a carnival license - Monticello Mall Merchants Asssrdation. (R.W.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Ms. Julie Ellis, Promotion Director for the Monticello Mall Merchants Association, will be in attendance at the meeting to request the Council reconsider its previous action limiting the carnival license to 8 days at the Monticello Mall. The primary reason for requesting reconsideration is the carnival operator and the Monticello Mall merchants would like to see it operational for the last two weekends in May-, and if the license is limited to eight days, they would not be able to operate two full weekends. The Merchants Association and carnival operator would like to request the home be amended under one of the two following options. Increase the license to a minimum of nine days so that the carnival could operate between Friday, May 18, and Saturday, May 27, or until May 28 (Sunday), which would require a ten-day permit. If the Council is not agreeable to increasing the number of days, allow the eight days to be split between the two weekends, with the carnival being idle Monday through Thursday, May 22 -May 26. As an additional note, the Council's approval at the last meeting of this license request was contingent upon all utility charges being brought up to date at the mall site. The mall owner has eliminated their account from the delinquent list recently. li. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Allow the carnival license to be increased from eight daysninjor ten enabling the operation to cover two weekends in May. o pyt, 2. Do not increase the number of days but allow the eight days to be split between two weekends. 3. Allow the previous action of a contiguous eight-day license to remain as is. Council Agenda - 5/W95 C. STAFF RECOMMENDATIOP[: Since I was not sure whether the Council had realized that reducing the original request from 13 days to B would not allow the carnival to operate 2 weekends, I thought it might be appropriate for the Council to at least address the issue again. Since both the Merchants Association representative and carnival operator noted that the bulk of their business occurs on weekends, both parties indicated they would like to have the Council reconsider their request by at least adding one day to allow for the carnival to be operated on Friday and Saturday nights for two weekends. If the Council feels eight days is still sufficient, this can be your option. D. SUPPORTING DATA: None. Council Agenda - &W6 12. Com dderajion of an Amendment to thq Monticello Zoning Orditmnoe that would change the efign setback minimum. (J.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Essentially, the ordinance amendment is a housekeeping matter that removes inconsistencies within the ordinance and enables placement of pylon signs in the B-4 (downtown) district at the property line, which is consistent with the minimum setback for buildings in the B-4 zone. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to adopt the ordinance amendment as presented. See the attached documentation firom the City Planner for the information on this topic. D. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt the ordinance amendment as proposed based on the findings below: a. corrects an inconsistency within the body of the current sign ordinance b. correlates the sign setback to the building setback, a more natural regulation C. results in a more easily -interpreted and applied sign ordinance 2. Motion to deny adoption of the ordinance amendment It would not be necessary to make a separate finding of fact to support this motion; however, the Council may consider the present ordinance, together with current interpretation and policy, to adequately address the issue of f-eestanding sign setbacks. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the ordinance amendment as proposed. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Planner's report prepared in conjunction with Cedar Street Garden Center conditional use permit; Propoaed ordinance amendment. PPR -28-1995 10:48 NRC oil »> �10— Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. RC URBAN PLANNING• 0 a S 1 O -MARKETT RESEARCH MMORAMUM TO: Monticello Planning Commission FROM: Stephen Grumman DATEL 27 Apel 1995 R& Monticello - Fieedaadia8 Sign ilegulOM in the 11.4 District FUZ NO: 191.06 RAMOROMM At it IM meedelgI the PWmiog Commbaion dismaed the inure of the ..,...,,.r....tng freestanding ales at the Cedar Street Garden Centerb our report oa the Garden Ceatces Caoditiooal Use Permit amendment, it was wed situ the dgn setback requirements In the 8-4 Mulct were taoosi— with the bnildtn; setbact ..:. .. .......This is related to the portion of the sign regulations which reqube pylon signs to be setback from the property line a distance of 15 fat, while buildings in the B•4 DiWtt may be eoartraaed with a zero seaback This brae was disamed in our report on the Cedar Sum Garden Center. The Planning Commiuioa's conseesus was to address the Sign seduck mquirements in the 8.4 District as a community Ordinance isms, other than an issue db dy rchtod to the 0 - Ir Curter Conditional Use Permit. The altemative approaches are recapped in the following section. ANALYSIS A • The fire altamtive wadd be to leave the Ordinance buguage as it mods. This proaoou two geoeral ftwtdaevcks. Plat b the roe mentioned In tbo Cadar Street Garden Caner issuer Tho btdWM in the 154 Dtwkt an be located at the paoWly Uue, whom a pylon dpi must be waback 15 fea :son Zoning Ordinance Sea. 3.9 (C) Subd. 7.) The second 5775 Wayzata Blvd. • Suite 555 1 Sl. Louis Park. MN 55416 - (612) 595.9636•Fax. 57 7 , 10. 48 NRC blC SJS P. U,, Ub ptoblma is related m Section 3-9 [El WA- 4.(a). Ibis lection mpi es pylae sips to be located amde of the requited yuda in say mmmg dirt. lbu moans that in thoso districts which hm building setbacks of moan thea 15 fact, which Is all ditmic4 but the &4. In those districts, the 13 foot sign setback reQ bumot is irrelevant sbm the building setbacY aosld predominate. • Mw wood altmettm would be to Minim the pylon alp regmremcat which tequuet that smch signs meat the tegulsr building left* thea atter rho 15 foot s fid requimmaat to a standard of 30 peroeast of the baildiag setback. 71h approach would aoodnoe rho City's policy of ngulaAg pyo signs cW4 by mating disuda, and would eliminate the "N .... i, .,i between both the two Ordiname sections, and between the diffmnlW B-4 building and sign sabackL A draft Ordinance which a;=mpIahes this effect is allached to this report. la order to acoos;J111 this lamer approach, the Planning Commission mast maloe Hodl which comply with tho Zoning Ordim m rsgoistioaa for emmdmmta. 'the planning Commission's coslsidm don of an OadM= amendment Is to be based upon the following factors, %I others: 1. Rrlatiaash� 2.ihe geognphkal area hmmhvd. 3. Wbetbar the use willdepredate the area fn which h is proposed 4.7be d atactor of the vm=mding area. 3.7he .. —.. . � � . l nand for the arc. In anabzi g d= fhb It Is clear that the (sty ail not be hftmdadng a now ase into any ams, but railer, it will meter be n:gaf4bg tbo location of an existing use (pylon dM). Tbo primary tactor of the above ttearu is alnnber 4, the character of the aanounding arca, and mranber S, rho demonmftd creed for the ase. With ngud to the murmading area, pylon ales nscIalromants which aamdw a location behind tie btdldhg setback would appear to be an bradonal atandatd. With regard to demonosted aced, tbao Is little ugumeat that char ad ttsoonbatinas wmmuaiatioa Is a need, and a rtght, of foal property owners. Where the Ordlaames which regulate that communication aro plain, the policies of the Comprehensive Pim ate most easily effect urod. Such a Andhlg to arppw of a motion to mod the Zoning Ordinanoo would acwnW'sh the Ordinance Ameadmmt requirmands. SUMMARY Tho Sip section of the Zoning Ordbmoe bon=* In conflict with itself In vWW to b setback rogaiemnems. We world rocoaameod an aramfbneat to the Ordbanoe which corrects the ia�t,.s, and clarion the ImMent of Vit 40 in 84 MMkts. A aegg Md draft Ordinuroearneadmerut Is attached. PC: Jeff O'Neill PPR -13-1995 1601 IAA 99-007 612 595 9837 P.02/12 IFFN-A Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. C unaAN PIANNINo- DES'IOM- MARKET RESEARCH MEMORANDUM TO: Moaticcllo Planning Commission FROM: Stepbm Griumaa DATE 13 April 1995 REL Montioell - Cedar Street Garden Ceaut CFaMwzty 'Fair's) FME NO: 191.07 - 95.05 Batkgr= d and B4faetlnte Cedar Street Garden C.eata has spplied for an amendmaa to a Conditional Use Permit odaioally Issued to dl predecessor 'Felt's Gard CesdC in 1989. The purpose of the amendment is to relocate rock bias from the Broadway frontage to the nordmaa comer of the Etre, currently demoted to equipment noraM The ruck bins would be replaced with addm-1 parking. No other changes am proposed at this time. AmandmeM to Condhimal Use Permits are Processed as if they wets new applilatinas. Analysis of Altaaadves Me Ran Chmm The Coed Use Femit Beamed to 1989 h -h~ a series of fooatem conditions which controlled use of the aim. For tho patrp = of this teview, it is asmmed that the ymvloosty esmblished eondidons Mete properly complied wBh, bowever an lospection should be made to verify this aaalMWalon Iachlded in than moons wag as agroemeat that a pordCn of the parlring an along Broadway oeed not be embed a regniud in the Zoning Oldioanee, perdiog future expand- of the paddne lot Also approved in the orloW permit was rd& from paving the drive arra mw4ng the rock bins. This reW was granted v4 a varimre fkom ib paving standards, with the coaditiom that no cusmmer d=ugh traffic were to be allowed. 5775 Wayzata Blvd - Suite 555 - St. Louis Park, " 55416 - (612) 595 -9636 -Fax. 595-9 \i RPR -13-1995 1601 NRC This application would fulfill the expectation of the 1989 approval. At this time, Paving of the new parting amu and completion of the auhiog tlwuld be a re gninmenr of the CUP amendment The trrffcc pamern for customers, as daigoed on the sine on, will be to mars from Cedar Seat, and travel either north or east through the parking las. Traffic which travels east would thea exit at a wrb art adjacent to the former location of the rock bins. As with the Previous permit, a cmdition 9wald be atracbed resmifag mm mer tnfflc fmm the unpaved areas, presammg that the City is willing to allow the cr a—,, of the gravel surfacing in such areas. With regard to the relocation of the rock bms, tlm previous site plan indicates a sibt foot high cedar fcacc or Lodsope screen from the nelgbbonag properties. 2be City should mview the existing screening autd detemaine its adequacy to buffer the proposed rock bin use from the Awning l - MILLUM The current Gamin Center heestaadiag sign is timated in a ....... ,..�,.....:,�, location adjacent to the Broadway Strut right of way. The Mamicell Zoning Ordinance ngaires a sethaci for such signs of flfteem feet from the property lim Maditiof the sign wUI M=4 be proposed by the nmav opera= to rile , the name d aage. According to off taformstion, the sign was not gnoted any special permisdoa to be located within the regnhed sign setback. As such, the'—Non of this sign would need to be ad&cuW in order to be We to malas a finding that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will mat the standards of the Zoning Ondiinaace, a typical fz=r in the City's considemdtm of such Pernis. ibeae aro three posalwities which the Planning Comzoiuim may wish to consider. First would be a rcgWr=eat that the sign be relocated to mea the required Sftem foot setback u is not clear from the atte plsa, but such a telomtlm may requite the elimination d nae of the parking spaces. A samcd ab=mstive would be considmaim of a vadam from the sign aethack .,,1. Variances require a lindiog of specs{ condition seJuing to a a... ... .....&'c physical hardship which would otherwise preehtde cc*iance with the pedo>mu= nanduds In our quick review of this situation, sucb a special eoadid— may be difficult to shm. A third alternative would be consideration of ammdmeaa to the sign regulations{ relating to freestanding sign setimcm. There may be some j asdflcation In this aln7nasiva in that while freestanding signs are tequhed to be ser back filteea iba fmca the right of way, buildhW can be conssucted with a aero setback In this zoning district. 'Iyiag the sign setbacks to building setbaclu may be a rcuotrable approach which the Piaoniag Cemmtsdon should discus. Regardless of the m3lid m chosenthe sppliaat should be given some direction u the Planning Comrrdarf a's w4hea in this tegud Any apptiadoas ncessary could be made by the appliant and considered by the Planning Commission at Is =a tneedn . PPR -13-1995 1601 NRC 612 595 9857 P.W12 The Planning Commission is chayged with =nndamg the following items m its eontesnplmon of a Cznd.;ont Use Permit appl md= • Relationship m the Comprehensive Plan. • The arra involved. • Wbether such use will toad to or acumlly depreciate the area in which S is proposed. • The character of the waoondiag area. • The d—,.........1 read far such nae. Tbk area is a pas of the extended Cental Bttsieeat Dist>ict. and L meed B4, Begiomal Business District Since the ase exists an the pQeseat loatioalhde impact is aspected on the sttaoandiag netlobwbood. As noted above, the changes to the operadrm sboald be reviewed as they WJM to the immeSeiy sdjaming property owners, pudcub* in the adCWUT of the suoeaiag am the sita. It world be aspected that a mduction,in the amouat of gravel odwe, and more a8 -surer ensooma patting, a clearer caft for pub pat9dng ahwld lmptove the site's operation in reli an to the =*Madwod. Co>tch" iora The amendment to the garden comer Canditlamal Use Parmit is m cpponamity to remove an die use fmm the Broadway Strad fiontage. In addhlom, the ezpansl— of the off -strand parldn ahaold serve to mdttoe congestion is the na dndag peat seasons of use, ad reds= the po=tW for adverse impacts ham► anpaved areas in and tape the Central Bud= Disain For than reasons, approval of the Conditional Use P=it amendmewt is fe=na%eoded. This nmommardatiom is based repos the following : 1. The garden center dea>oaase ca®pltanoe with all pneviM* imposed coaditims of the original CUP issued in 1989. 2. The area hem which do rock bias an being removed is to be pried and robed. peer Ordiaanoe requirements for oommamdal paddag lob, and par the atpecation of die 1989 Permit spprovaL 3. The arta maoaading the now root bis ioaaion is dct=hzd to be adeqntay screened at presets, or additional =eeafag efforts an degoi:ed 4. The heestandiag dgn Is mato to be c onfamin j, aftlmer throogb an ameirdMPMt to the Ordtmm. or reloeadcas of the dga to mea cotwolWtg mach. pc: Jeff O'Neill ra 1 ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN THAT CHAPTER 3-9, GENERAL PROVISIONS, OF.THE MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO SIGNS BY REGULATING THE ALLOWABLE 89MACM FOR PYLON SIGNS AND SIGNS OVER TWO SQUARE FEET IN AREA BE AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: Section 3-9 [C] 7 is hereby amended to read as follows: In any district, any portion of any sign exceeding two (2) square feet shall be set back a distance equal to fitly percent (60%) of the required building setback for that district as defined in Section 3-3 [C] of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, as may be amended. Section 3-9 [E] 4(a) is hereby amended to read as follows: (a) Location: No pylon sign shall be located closer to the property line than as allowed in Section 3.9 [C] 7. In the case of a corner lot, both sides fronting on a public right-of-way shall be deemed the front. This ordinance shall take effect and be in tall force from and after its passage and publication. Adopted by the Monticello City Council this 8th day of May, 1995. Mayor City Administrator Council Agenda - !i/JW5 13. Conside;sltloa of an ordinance amendment adopting 1994 BpildinY Code. (G.A.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider adopting the 1994 Minnesota State Building Code with the numerous amount of changes within the building code, which are submitted for your review. The most noticeable ones you will see changing from the 1988 code to the 1994 Building Code. I have a booklet that we made highlighting the changes from the 1988 code to the 1994 code. If you would like to see the changes in the entire booklet which is comprised of over 50 pages of code changes, please feel Gree to stop by my office and I will explain those changes prior to the City Council meeting. B. ALTERNATIVE SONS 1. Approve the ordinance Amendment adopting the 1994 Building Code. 2. Do not adopt the 1994 Building Code. C_ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: With the proposed many changes to the 1994 Building Code, with the summarization of the most noticeable changes submitted with the supporting data, staff recommends approval of the 1994 Uniform Building Code. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the existing building code section of the ordinance; Copy of the proposed 1994 Building Code update to the ordinance; Copies of the most noticeable changes to the code. 13 CARWN-r 6RD1JurgAvCE CHAPTER 1 BUILDING CODE SECTION: 4-1-1: Intent and Purpose 4-1-2: Building Code 4-1-3: Organization and Enforcement 4-1-4: Permits, Inspections and Fees 4-1-5: Fire Zone Districts 4-1-6: Violations and Penalties 4-1-7: Effective Date of Ordinance 4-1-1: INTENT AND PURPOSE: An ordinance adopting the Minnesota Building Code; providing for its administration and enforcement: regulating the erection, construction, enlargement, alteration, repair, moving, removal, demolition, conversion, occupancy, equipment, use, height, area, and maintenance of all buildings and/or structures in the city of Monticello; providing for the issuance of permits and collection of fees. 4-1-2: BUILDING CODE: The Minnesota State Building Code, one spy of which is on file in the office of the City Administrator, has been adopted by Minnesota Statutes 16.651 (1971) as a uniform building code applicable throughout the state. Such code, its supplements, amendments, additions, addenda, alterations, subtractions, and revisions as currently adopted and which may in the future be adopted and incorporated as part of the code, is hereby confirmed as the building code of the City of Monticello and incorporated in this ordinance as completely as if set out in full. The administrative authority for the City of Monticello as specified in 4-1-3 of th ie code shall maintain on file in his/her office a record of all adopted supplements, amendments, etc., and shall utilize in the enforcement of: the building code as if set out in full in this section. (A) The 1988 Edition of the State Building Code, with appendixes, adopts by reference the following codes: 1. Minnesota Rules, Part 1300 - Code Administration. 2. Minnesota Rules, Part 1301 - Cert 1fication and Continuing Education of Building Officials. 3. Minnesota Rules, Part 1302 - Building Construction and State Agoncy Construction Rules. 4. Minnesota Rules, Part 1305 - Adoption of the 1988 Uniform Building Code by roferonce. Tho 1987 ANSI -A-17.1 Code for elevat ore and rslatod devices is an amendment to Chapter 51 of the U13C and no longor found in SBC Rules 1320. MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE IV/Chet 1/ 750"A") a) Required Provisions --UBC Appendix, Chapter 35, Sound Transmission Control. 5. Minnesoa Rules, Part 1315 - Electrical Code. 6. Minnesota Rules, Part 1325 - Solar Energy Systems. 7. Minnesota Rules, Part 1330 - Technical Requirements for Fallout Shelters. 8. Minnesota Rules, Part 1335 - Flood -Proofing Regulations (when required). 9. Minnesota Rules, Part 1340 - Facilities for the Handicapped. 10. Minnesota Rules, Part 1346 - Minnesota Uniform Mechanical Code, 1990 Edition. 11. Minnesota Rules, Part 1350 - Manufactured Home Rules. 12. Minnesota Rules, Part 1355 - Plumbing Code - Administrative Rule 4715. 13. Minnesota Rules, Part 1360 - Prefabricated Structures. 14. Minnesota Rules, Part 1365 - Variation of Snow Loads. 15. Minnesota Rules, Part 1370 - Model Energy Code - Administrative Rule 7670. 16. Minnesota Rules, Part 7510.3100-7510.3280 - Adoption of the 1988 Uniform Fire Code by reference. (6/22/81, 0103) (1/10/94, #245) 4-1-3: ORGANIZATION AND ENFORCEMENT: The organization of the Building Department and enforcement of the code shall be conducted within the guidelines established by Chapter 2 of the Uniform Building Code, 1982 Edition. The code shall be enforced within the incorporated limits of the city of Monticello, and any extra -territorial limits shall be any area, Incorporated or unincorporated, designated under a Joint Powers Agreement entered into by the City of Monticello and any other township/village/city/county. The Building Department shall be the Building Code Department of the City of Monticello. The administrative authority shall be a State Certified Class II "Building Official" so designated by the appointing authority. Tho appointing authority shall be the City Council of the City of Monticello. MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE IV/Chet 1/ 4-1-4: PERMITS, INSPECTIONS AND FEES: (A) The issuance of permits, conduction of inspections, and collections of fees shall ba established by the City Council. (7/13/81, 0104) (B) Surcharge: In addition to the permit fee required by item A above, the applicant shall pay a surcharge. The surcharge computation is based on the value of construction. Surcharge equals .0005 of the total value of construction or 50 cental whichever is greater. (7/13/81, 0104) 4-1-5: FIRE ZONE DISTRICTS: All areas within the city of Monticello shall be i n Fire Zone 03. 4-1-6: VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES: The penalty described in the Uniform Building Code, 1979 Edition, Section 205 as amended, shall be in keeping with Minnesota Statutes 609.031, which provides for a maximum fine of $500 or imprisonment for 90 days, or both. 4-1-7: EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDINANCE: The effective date of this ordinance shall be upon publication. (5/29/84, 0135) MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE TITLE IV/Chet 1/n3 qovposed Ordihancei ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, HEREBY ORDAINS THAT TITLE 4, CHAPTER 1, OF THE MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO BUILDING CODE BE AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWING: CHAPTER 1 BUILDING CODE SECTION: 4-1-1: Intent and Purpose 4-1-2: Building Code 4-1-3: Application, Administration, and Enforcement 4-14: Permits and Fees 4-1-6: Fire Zone Districts 4-1-6: Violations and Penalties 4-1-7: Effective Date of Ordinance 4.1-1: INTENT AND PURPOSE: An ordinance adopting the Minnesota State Building Code. This ordinance provides for the application, administration, and enforcement of the Minnesota State Building Code by regulating the erection, construction, enlargement, alteration, repair, moving, removal, demolition, conversion, occupancy, equipment, use, height, area, and maintenance of all buildings and/or structures in the city of Monticello; provides for the issuance of permits and collection of fees thereof, provides penalties for violation thereof; repeals all ordinances and parts of ordinances that conflict therewith. 4-1.2: BUILDING CODE: The Minnesota State Building Code, established pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 168.69 to 16B.76, is hereby adopted as the building cede for this jurisdiction. Such code, its supplements, amendments, additions, addenda, alterations, subtractions, and revisions as currently adopted and which may in the future be adopted and incorporated as part of the Godo, is hereby confirmed as the building code of the City of Monticello and hereby incorporated in this ordinance as if fully set out herein. (A) The Minnesota Slate Building Code includes the following chapters of Minnesota Rules: Ordinance Amendment No. Page 2 1. 1300 Minnesota Building Code 2. 1301 Building Official Certification 3. 1302 Stals Building Construction Approvals 4. 1306 Adoption of the 1994 Uniform Building Code, including Appendix Chapters: a. 3, Division I, Detention and Correctional Facilities b. 12, Division II, Sound Transmission Control C. 29, Minimum Plumbing Fixtures 6. 1307 Elevators and Related Devices 8. 1316 Adoption of the 1993 National Electrical Code 7. 1326 Solar Energy Systeme 8. 1330 Fallout Shelters 9. 1336 Floodproofing Regulations 10. 1340 Facilities for the Handicapped 11. 1346 Adoption of the 1991 Uniform Mechanical Code 12. 1360 Manufactured Homes 13. 1360 Prefabricated Buildings 14. 1366 Snow Loads 16. 1370 Storm Shelters 16. 4716 Minnesota Plumbing Code 17. 7670 Minnesota Energy Code 18. Adoption of the 1991 Uniform Fire Code by reference. (B) The City of Monticello may adopt by reference any or all of the following optional appendix chapters of the 1994 Uniform Building Code as authorized by Minneacta rule part 1306.0020 subpart 2; 3, Division III, 1992 One and Two Family Dwelling Code; 16, Reroofing; 19, Exposed Residential Concrete; 31, Division II, Membrane Structures; 33, Excavation and Grading. The following optional appendix chapters of the 1994 Uniform Building Code are hereby adopted and incorporated as part of the building code for this maricipaUty. Chapter 16, Reroofing (C) The City of Monticello may adopt by reference any or all of the following options) chapters of Minnesota rule: 1306, Special Fire Protection Systems with option 8 Wroup M, 8, or F occupancies with 2,000 or more gross square feet) or 8a (Group M, 8, or F occupancies with 6,000 or more gross square feet); 1310, Building Security; 1336, Floodproofing regulations parts 1336.0600 to 1936.1200. Ordinance Amendment No. Page 3 4-1-3: APPLICATION, ADMINISTRATION, AND ENFORCEMENT: The code shall be enforced within the incorporated limits of the city of Monticello, and any extra -territorial limits permitted by Minnesota Statute 16B.62, subdivision 1, shall be any area, incorporated or unincorporated, designated under a Joint Powers Agreement entered into by the City of Monticello and any other township/village/city/county. The code enforcement department of the City of Monticello is called the Building Code Department. A Minnesota certified Building Official must be appointed by the City Council of the City of Monticello to administer the code (Minnesota Statute 16B.65). 4-1-4: PERMITS AND FEES: (A) The issuance of permits and the collection of fees shall be as authorized in Minnesota Statute 16B.62, subdivision 1, and as provided for in chapter 1 of the 1994 Uniform Building code and Minnesota rules parts 1305.0106 and 1305.0107. (B) Permit fees assessed for work governed by this code shall be established by the City Council. (C) Surcharge: A surcharge fee shall be collected on all permits issued for work governed by this code in accordance with Minnesota Statute 16B.70. 4.1-5: FIRE ZONE DISTRICTS: All areas within the city of Monticello shall be in Fire Zone M3. 4-1-6: VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES: A violation of the code is a misdemeanor (Minnesota Statute 16B.69). 4-1-7: EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDINANCE: The effective date of this ordinance shall be upon publication. Adopted by the Monticello City Council this 8th day of May, 1995. Mayor City Administrator 1988 Uniform Building Code to 1994 Uniform Building Code v Update 139 SMOKE DETECTORS SHALL SOUND AN ALARM SIGNAL AUDIBLE IN ALL SLEEPING ROOMS BUILDING SECOND STORY BASEMENT FIRST STORY D UIIC SEC. 310.0.1.4 Section 310.9.1 Smoke Detectors Smoke detectors are now required within each sleeping room of a dwelling unit. Detectors in sleep rooms are in addition to those required in other locations. Placing detectors within the rooms will provide a warning to the occupants of the room if a fire starts within the bedroom Bed Room o< / 0 Bed Room Smoke Detecto; rs Living Area 13x: Sections 310.9.1.3 Smoke Detectors Smoke detectors must receive their primary power from a commercial source and be provided with a battery backup MATCH TZiE ANCHOR BOLT LAYOUT WITH 3 SOLID JOIST SPACE BLOCK$I WHERE JOISTS RUN PARAI LEL TO FOUNDATION WALL 1.. jr 7 h n- REBAR & CORE FILL REQ,6' ON CTR & MAX 1' FROM ENDS & CORNERS ON ALL BLACK WALLS BACK FILLED ONE SIDE ONLY �• 7 :l In- X 9" ANCHOR BOLTS REQ 6' O.C. & MAX V FROM ENDS & •_ •f CORNERS. MIN 2 BOLTS ANY PLATE CORE FILL 318 NOT REQUIRED WHERE WALL IS BACK FILLED BOTH SIDES. . ' A w .::. SKY LIGHT WELLS MUST HAVE 8" FRAWNG TO RECEIVE R•19 INSULATION. J II I II � Ij �I In �I II v I� II y I , v INTERIOR VAULTED CEILING GABLES - DIFFERENCE IN CEILING HEIGHT MUST HAVE 6" FRAMING TO RECEIVE R-19 INSULATION ':dr --e d' ;;eZ L.: -,�N Section 509.1 Guardrails Maximum permitted spacing for intermediate rails or ornamental patterns in guardrails has been reduced to that which a 4 -inch sphere cannot pass through. Spacing change will reduce the possibility that children will be able to squeeze through such openings. Exception has been added which will retain the 6 inch sphere requirement at the triangular area formed by the tread, riser and gwardrail. I� 4" Maximum y� n __- s �• Triai� 27 i ,3,y Table 16•A Uniform and Concentrated Loading Residential Deck 400 Per Square F Uve Load Residential Balcony . r 600 Per %uare�F"t Uve Load ,,�-i`-�`�'•__�._ Jam.;.._ J�`' '--)`._a,_,?� �_ �- �_ � ._�. Section 2406.4, Item io Glazing in Hazardous Locations Glazing within S feet of the bottom and top of stairways, and where bottom edge is less than 60 inches above an adjacent walling surface, shall be designed in accordance with the hazardous location provisions of Section 240b. Handrails Section 1 The provisions of this section have been revised so that handrail extensions are now regulated. These heights are the same as that required for handrails. The length of the handrail extension has also been modified from 6 inches to where it must now extend at least IZ inches 1 beyond the top and bottom riser. .ssp. 34" to 3s" Above Landing T. Newel Post or Saieri Terminal 34.9 to 3,1" Abc ve Landing i� .'�(.y r'♦ .' `: , +•T � .�i `f�./t t�!� %'4. ✓�`' ly �� ,rte Section 302.4, Exception 3 Fire Rating for Occupancy Separations 5/8" Type X gypsum board on garage side 13/8" solid wood _ door or to minute door. Self closing V--- and tight fitting O Section 1404 and UBC Standard 14-2 Vinyl Siding A new standard and code section has been added to provide requirements for vinyl siding. UBC Standard 14.2 provides a materials standard which regulates extruded single-wall siding manufactured from rigid PVC compound. Section 1404 regulates the location and application. In general, vinyl siding may be installed on exterior walls of Type V construction in Minnesota. Where siding is placed horizontally it must be fastened 16" o/c horizontally and 12" vertically. If placed vertically, fasteners must be spaced 12" o/c both ways. Nails are to have 3/81' heads and .120 shank diameter and be long enough to penitrate the studs or nailing strip 3/411. X47 N, Minnesota Plumbing Code Shower Valves. A shower or combination shower / bath in a new or remodeled installation must be equipped with an antiscald-type shower control valve. The valve must be of the thermostatic or pressure balancing type in accordance with the ANSI / ASSE standard 1016-79. Repair or replacement alone does not require a new valve be installed. 13S 11 Minnesota Plumbing Code: Nater Closets All new floor mounted closets in areas of the state under the Minnesota Plumbing Code may not have a flush volume of more than 1.6 gallons. The water closet must meet the standards of the Commissioner of Health and the American National Standard (ANSI) Council Agenda - 5/8/95 ra. Consideration of a reanest by Ryan ContractLs to allow cmnatrusftg activity froax 7@,m,to 10 o.m, W.O., J.S.) A. REFEREjjF,,AND BACKGROUND: Current ordinance requires that working hours end at 7 p.m. Ryan Contracting is requesting that the City Council allow Ryan to work during extended hours from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. The reason for limiting vvorlung hours is to minimise the impact on adjoining residential and commercial uses during at least a portion of the day. In addition, extending hours beyond 7 p.m. can hamper our ability to inspect projects. It is very difficult for both the City and OSM to expect its inspection staff to be on duty after 7 p.m. The Klein Fars project is somewhat unique in that it is well separated from residential uses; therefore, working beyond 7 p.m. may not create a problem for the nearest residential area. Therefore, there may be some justifieat ion for allowing an extension of hours at this site only. If Council is so inclined to extend the hours with the Klein Farms project, it should be clearly noted in the motion that the extension is allowed due to the distance between the construction zone and populated areas. Regardless of the impact on residential areas, there remains the problem of finding an inspector to be available between 7 p.m. and 10 p.m. This particular project is being inspected by OSM and is not a project inspected regularly by Tom Bose. According to Bret Weiss, OSM will have difficulty in being able to find an inspector that is willing to work beyond 7 p.m. Perhaps as a condition of allowing Ryan to work beyond 7 p.m., Ryan Contracting should be required to pay an additional fee per hour of inspections past 7 p.m.; however, the workload is such that a second inspector will be needed soon, so OSM will start a second man next week. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to deny allowing extension of work hours as requested by Ryan Contracting. Under this alternative, the City Council would take the position that allowing Ryan Contracting to work beyond the normal working hours would set a bad precedent for other projects and would put the City in the difficult position of coordinating inspection services during this time period. Motion to approve an extension of work hours beyond 7 p.m. due to the distance between the development area and existing residential properties and subject to one or more of the fbllowing conditions: Council Agenda - 5095 1. Hours of operation must end at p.m. (Council may wish to fill in the time period Perhaps you would allow an extension of time beyond 7 p.m. but not as late as 10 p.m.) 2. Ryan Contracting is to pay the City a supplemental inspection fee for any hours that an inspector must be available after 7 p.m. (This amount would be in addition to the amount that the inspector charges against the projcct on an hourly basis). 3. After-hours construction will not be allowed in the event the inspector is not available. 4. The extension of hours is on a trial basis only and could be withdrawn based on neighborhood complaints or other situations warranting reinstatement of normal working hours. Under this alternative, the City Council would take tl a view that the lflein Farms situation is relatively unique and thn allowing an extension of hours in this situation would not crr --te a bad precedent. City staff should follow this item with an ordinance amendment allowing extension of working hours with conditions on a case-by- case basis. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: There is some benefit to the City in having the project done on a timely basis. Extending working hours will help the City achieve this objective. On the other hand, timely completion of the work is only positive if it is inspected properly and done in a manner that does not disrupt the neighboring areas. The first choice in this situation is to deny the request; however, it is our view that allowing an extension of the working hours to 8 p.m. or 9 p.m. would be a reasonable alternative as long as the conditions outlined are adopted. Copy of letter fiom Ryan Contracting, Inc, is RYAN CONTRACTING. INC. TEL:612-tly4-32U/ May Ui y5 11:4J Nu.vu, r.0 April 25. 1995 To Honorable City Council CITY OF MONTICELI.O 250 Best Broadway MOntic@LLo, Minnesota 35362 RBi KLIEN rARMS Grading, Streets, Utilities and Appurtenant York City Project No. 95-02C 1RCI 13081 Monticello. Minnesota Dear Honorable City Councils Please accept this letter as our forty 1 written request for extending working hours on the above referenced project. We are requesting that working hours be extended from 7t00 e.■. to 10100 p.m. Monday thru Friday and 7z00 m.a, to 7x00 p. a. on Saturday. No work will be performed on Sunday. We appreciate your time and help on this project and we Look forward to working with your city and staff. If you have any questions or concerns please contact me. Thank you. Respectfully submitted, RYAN CONTRACTING. INC. Scott [. Enright SEE/bp col Tom Base. City of Monticello Bret Melss. Orr-Sohelen-Mayeron L Assooiates, 2no. + Y 870013th Ave. E a ShAmpee, MN 53379 a 613891.3100 a Fax: 612.891-1207 (�Q IT'S Council Agenda - WW5 is. 4kadderation of reviewina Trunk Highway SS drainagg etndv. W.O.) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Pete Willenbring of OM will be in attendance to review the Trunk Highway 25 storm drainage study. As you recall, you were given a copy of the draft document as part of the agenda packet for the pivvious meeting. Please review this document and come prepared to discuss it f rther with its author, Pete Willenbring. Council Agenda - 6/8/96 16. Copslderatlon of pdgo#t oxygective covenants and establishing lot gric:es • Eased Knoll subdivlaton. UO.) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Council is asked to review the Eastwood Knoll subdivision one last time prior to initiation of sales activity. Issues that need to be addressed include adoption of covenants and appointing an architectural committee, establishment of initial pricing, and providing guidance to staff regarding negotiation of prices and financing options. PROTECTIVE COVENANTS The proposed protective covenants have been prepared by Dale Florek. In preparing the covenants, Florek combined his experience with the draft documents already prepared by City staff. Major points to note in the covenants include a provision for a minimum house size requirement, mandatory three-cer garage, and a tree preservation review process. An effort has been made to make the covenants restrictive without unduly limiting developability of the lots that are in less desirable locations. Please review the covenants and consider volunteering to sit on the architectural review committee. PRICING Dale Florek has done a market analysis of the site and has established the suggested pricing as noted on the attached pricing summary. The pricing listed represents the gMh price or discount price. For purposes of marketing the properties, the prices will be increased by 6%, which will reflect the minimum cost to purchase lots via contract -for -deed. The most expensive lots are proposed to have a selling price of $31,900. The least expensive lots are proposed to have a selling price of $22,900. The average price of the lots is $27,000. Florek indicated that he reviewed sale prices for lots in the general area and established the proposed sale prices at a level consistent with the market. Factors that influenced pricing of individual lots included proximity to the fteeway and proximity to adjoining residential properties, grade problems/ tuckunders, and proximity to the power linea. Council Agenda - 5/8/95 TERMS Florek noted that many of the buyers will be selling homes or will need to liquidate other assets in order to obtain the funds necessary to buy the lot of choice. For these buyers, having the option of purchasing a lot via contractrfor-deed will be a desirable option. The terms should require 20% of the value of the lot as a non-refundable deposit. The term of the contract should be two years or less to discourage buyers purchasing the lots for investment purposes. The contract would require an interest payment at market rate amortized ever 30 years, which would cover the City's holding cost. Florek noted that buyers interested in Eastwood Knoll will be relatively sophisticated and likely to have the resources and commitment to follow through on the contract. He did not think that the City will have a problem with closing contracts when buyers have put down 20% on the desired lot. Construction would be allowed only after frill payment on the lot is made. On the other hand, the City could take the position that the buyers always have the option of going to the bank to get the money needed to pay cash for the property. The City could avoid the administrative hassle of tracking contract payments, etc., by simply requiring cash for the purchase of each lot. At this point, it is assumed that minimal negotiations will occur with individual buyers. The prices listed will be take -it or leave -it prices. This position could change if Iota do not sell. Florek has suggested a builder program that would allow a builder to buy a lot, then hold up to three lots for $500/lot for up to 180 days. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: DECISION ONE - PROTECTIVE COVENANT18 1. Motion to adopt the protective covenants as is or as modified during discussion and appoint Jeff O'Neill, Gary Anderson and Councilmember to the architectural review committee. This has basically been Rick's project up to this point. Due to the fact that he is interested in purchasing a lot. he has removed himself from the situation. If Rick remains interested in buying a lot, I will be on the review committee. If Rick does not buy a lot, perhaps he Is Council Agenda - 5/895 should sit on the committee. Gary is proposed to sit on the committee because of his understanding of building/construction valuation. A Council member is asked to sit on the committee to help assure that the development moves in the general direction desired by Council. DECISION TWO - LOT PRICIIVG AND TERMS Motion to adopt initial price fisting and establish potential terms for buyers interested in purchasing via contract -for deed as outlined above. Motion to adopt initial price listing and require bill rash payments. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the protective covenants as presented or with modifications as identified by Council. Staff also recommends that Council adopt the initial lot pricing as noted. The action above paves the vvey to sell lots, which will begin in earnest immediately. Protective covenants; Lot price listing and map; Other information. 19 PROPOSED COVENANTS EASTWOOD KNOLL SUBDIVISION Land Use and Budding Tme. Each lot shall be used exclusively for residential purposes. No building'shall be erected, altered, placed, or permitted to remain on any lot other than one detached single family dwelling, together with appurtenant garage, fence, swimming pool, or accessory structure. Architectural Control. No building shall be placed, erected, or altered on any lot until the construction plans and specifications and the plans showing the nature, kind, shape, height, materials, and location/setback of the structure have been approved in writing by the Architectural Control Committee (ACC) as to the quality of workmanship and materials, harmony of external design with existing structures, and as to the location with reaped to topographic and finish grade elevation. All building plans and designs and exterior colors shall be reviewed by the ACC for the purpose of ensuring that the principal street frontage exposure of budding(s) are constructed of materials such as stucco, cedar, redwood, and brick accents, ora combination thereof. Cc at t%� Aw'{„ ifwo"_ fRe e A0 "J Each single family dwelling constructed on any lot within the developer's property shall, together with improvements appurtenant thereto, have sufficient architectural characteristics and interior square footage to create the image of a market value, as determined by the ACC, of not less Ulan One Hundred Fifty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($16000.00). Exception for Lot 1, Block 1; Lots 1, 2, 12, 13, Block 2; and Lots 1, 2, 3, Block 3: The ACC will determine their value at no less than $130,000 as adjusted for 1996 home values. Other items to pertain to all properties are: • 20% of the front elevation shall be done in brick or stone. L • All yards shall be sodded o rear camera of the house from the curb (allowances may be made for using native ground cover). • Roofs shall be a minimum of 8/12 pitch unless a flatter pitch is necessary to accommodate an architecturally -significant design feature of the home. • Homo foundation footprint minimums, excluding garages and porches, shall be: EASTWOOD.COV: 6/6/96 Page 1 R For Lot 1, Block 1; Lots 1, 2, 12, 13, Block 2; and Lots 1, 2, 3, Block 3: Rambler--------------- 1260 with a 3 -car garage 2Story------------.-- 860 with a 3 -car garage Multi-level-----------. 1600 with a 3 -car garage Home foundation footprint minimums for all other Iota shall be as follows: Rambler-------------- 1400 with a 3 -car garage 2 -Story-----------.---- 1100 with a 3 -car garage Multi-level-------------- 1660 with a 3 -car garage "NOTE: Three -car garages may not be mandatory if the ACC decides the home has the architectural integrity to carry the valuation without it. Driveways shall be concrete, asphalt, or equivalent hard surface. 4. Temaorary Structures. No structure of a temporary character or nature, trailer, tent, or shack may be used on any lot at any time as a residence, either temporarily or permanently. All structures shall be completed and finished on the exterior within nine months after commencement of the excavation or construction thereof and before the structure shall be used as a residence. No dwelling shall be constructed of concrete blocks or blocks of a similar type on any lot unless the outer exterior walls above grade are of a decorative variety which meets ACC approval. b. Nuisances. No accumulation of junk, garbage. or debris may be maintained on any lot. No trailer house, travel trailer, buses, trucks, camper trucks, or junk care are allowed to be stored on premises unless properly garaged. No livestock shall be kept on the premises except for two doge and tate. No breeding or boarding kennels will be permitted. Dogs and cats will not be allowed to run free. Dogs must be properly kenneled and must not be allowed to bark uncontrollably. Kennels must be of chain link fencing and set on concrete slabs. A site barrier fence blocking the view Brom the street may be required Oy the ACC. All kgnnela musLW approved by the ACC. 8. nm' 1A Q archItectural control committee shall consist of the City of Monticello Building Official and/or a designated representative of the developer. The Building Official and/or the developers designated representative shall review all building structure plane and specifications for adherence to the covenants and restrictions that relate to minimum building standards along with the harmony of the exterior design and location in relation to surrounding structures. EASTWOOD.COV: 6/6196 Page 29 Tree ?rgsgrvation. The building plan shall include all survey information required by the City. The survey shall also show the location, variety, and approximate size of mature trees located within 36 feet of all construction and grading activity. The ACC shall review grading and site development plans for adherence to the objective of saving as many mature trees as possible. The ACC has the authority to require that reasonable efforts be made to preserve trees. Such efforts include construction of retaining walls and the like. The ACC may require a minimum of two 2 -inch diameter frees planted in the front yard if the yard is barren. Landscape plan must be submitted for reviewal. Term. The covenants, conditions, and restrictions of this declaration shall run with and bind the land comprising the developer property and shall be enforceable by the declarants, the owners, and the respective legal representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns for a term of ten years from the date this declaration is recorded, atter which time said covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be automatically renewed for successive periods of ten years. The provisions hereof shall be deemed independent and several, and the invalidity or partial invalidity or unenforceability of any one provision or portion thereof as may be determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any of the other provisions hereof. This declaration may only be amended by a written instrument signed by the developer and all owners of the developer property. EA87WOOD.COV: 6W5 D/�C- Pago 3 TERMS FOR LOT PURCHASE EABIWOOD KNOLL SUBDIVISION '• 5% discount for cash •• Contract for deed 1-2 year duration of contract No improvements until the City is paid in full 20% down Market rate interest •' Buy 1 lot • cash out City before construction of model home. V000— City City will hold up to three lots ® $5ft.V per lot for 180 days. •' Lot hold binder is nonrefundable but will be applied to purchase price. EASTWOOD.TEII: &%M Cash discount price --actual advertised price 51 higher per lot. EASTWOOD KNOLL LOT PRICE BREAKDOWN BLOCK 1 Dl= 3 Lot 1 —$26,900. Lot 1 —$24,900. 2 —$25,900. 2 —$22,900. 3 —$22,900• 3 —$22,900. 4 —$24,000. 4 —$24,900. 5 —$24,000. 5 —$27,900. $123,700. 6 —$28,900. 7 —$28,900. Block 2 $181,300. Int 1 —$25,900. 2 —$27,900. BLDCK 4 3 —$30,900. Lot 1 —$26,900. 4 --$31,900. 2 ---$27,900. 5 --$31,900. 3 --$27,900. 6 —$30,900. 4 —$26,900. 7 —$28,900. $109,600. 8 --$30,900. 9 —$27,900. BLOCi( 1 --$123,700. 10 ---$28,900. BLOf]( 2 --$368,700. 11 --$26,900. BLOCK 3 --$181,300. 12 ---$22,900. BLOCK 4 --$1091600. 13 —$22,900. 70ML LOT SALE PROCEEDS --$783,300. $368,700. MIM1S R.S. OMISSION ----$ 78,330. NET PROCMG------$704,970. Title Work,Closing Expesu3ee,Taxen and any negotiated items must still be subtracted frcm the tut Pr0000da. Rmq?ptfully Submitted, DALE FU3REK EDINA REALTY /(Q CR pb MOM EASTWO OD KNOLL Council Agenda - 5/895 17. Consideration of purchase of one -ton bucket truck. (J.S.) A. REFERENCE AND 4ALKGROUND: We have recently learned that our practice of using a man in a bucket of the front-end loader to repair traffic lights, install decorations, banners, tree trimming, etc., must cease immediately. We learned this after an inspection of our safety program and public works facilities on March 23 of this year by Berkley Administrators, representing our insurance company. One of the main tasks performed by a man in the loader bucket was the changing of the traffic signal bulbs at the various intersections in Monticello. The City of Monticello is charged with bulb replacement and painting of all the traffic signals in the city limits with the exception of the two on the I-94 overpass. This affects not only the state signals on Highway 26 but the county signal on East County Road 75 at the intersection of County Road 39 and County Road 118. Northern States Power Company maintains all of our overhead cobra lights at intersections and throughout the community. They will not, however, be responsible for changing traffic signal bulbs due to the small time frame needed to respond and the fact that they have a heavy workload and emergencies of their own. We have been lucky so far since the March 23 inspection in that we have only had one signal light burn out. At that time, we were notified that the signal light was out early in the morning, and we contacted Olson Electric when they opened and asked them to change the bulb as soon as possible, as they have an old bucket truck which can reach the heights necessary. They did not, however, get the bulb changed until almost 6 o'clock that evening. Since it was a red light bulb, this time frame is unacceptable, and we were contacted by the Sheriffs Department twice during the interim to get the bulb replaced. In addition, the cost to change that single light bulb, not including the bulb, which we provided, was $103. The City has rented a bucket truck at least twice a year from one of the bucket truck suppliers, and We costa us approximately $260 per day plus six man-hours to go down and pick the unit up and then return it. In addition, we must provide all general liability and comprehensive insurance by obtaining a special certificate through our insurance company each time we rent a truck (est. cost $50). We could get by with a smaller truck than what we normally rent and use the truck for general transportation and street and part work if we got something no bigger than a one -ton. We had figured on purchasing a used pickup for the park and street department and placed $8,000 in the budget for that. In addition, we have about $1,800 in rental budget. We have looked around for a used vehicle throughout the 20 Council Agenda - 6/8196 upper midwest, and what we would really like to have is a one -ton truck with a utility body, similar to the blue truck used in the water department but with a 30 -foot single bucket arm -mounted in the bed. A new unit would coat in the neighborhood of $40,000. During our search of truck and heavy equipment advertisements and discussions with several local suppliers of this type of equipment, we did locate one unit set up exactly as we would like it in Grand Rapids, Michigan, for $8,996. We also found a van in Minot, North Dakota, for $14,000. The van, however, would be less suited to the dual purpose use which we intend for the vehicle. And, before I could get comments back from the Council that would allow us to purchase the unit Brom Grand Rapids, it was sold, and the van has also been sold. Consequently, we need some pre -authorization to move toward purchase of a used or new vehicle. The following is a summary of some of the uses for the vehicle. 1. Changing traffic signal bulbs at five complete intersections in the city. 2. Changing bulbs on elevated poles such as the lights in the city hall parking lot, commuter parking lot, and parka throughout the city. 3. Changing, repair, and maintenance of the "Your Kind Of Place" banners throughout the city. 4. General tree trimming throughout the community. 6. Roof access to such access as the public works building. This building is approximately 24 R high and has no permanent access outside or inside tho building. 6. General transportation for moving men and equipment for the street and parks department. 7. Painting of buildings and signals and ornamental poles throughout the community. S. Installation and removal of Christmas decorations. 9. Flag pole and flag maintenance. 10. Clock maintenance at city hall tower. 21 Council Agenda - 6/6/96 11. Bulb changes in the public works buildings—the lights in the vehicle storage building are elevated 19 R above the floor. These are some of the uses that would be most common or routine. The first alternative would be to direct City staff to draw up specifications for a new one -ton truck with bucket at an estimated cost of $40,000 and advertise for bids. The second alternative wou,a be to authorize City staff to purchase a used vehicle equipped similar to the truck previously found in Grand Rapids, Michigan, and authorize expenditures between $10,000 and $20,000 to purchase the vehicle. The third alternative would be to continue to rent a bucket truck where applicable and contract out all of the other work and purchase a used pickup instead of a dual purpose vehicle. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the City Administrator, Public Works Director, and Street & Parks Superintendent that the City Council authorize either alternative U1 or alternative 112. The 1998 Budget has $8,000 in it for the used pickup, $1,800 for rental and, if needed, $21,600 budgeted for a small loader and trailer. If the loader fluids are needed for the bucket truck, we could put off that purchase until next year. In addition, one would think that we could use a small amount of the state -aid maintenance funds for the purchase of a truck to be used for maintaining traffic signals. Consequently, the funds would be available for either the purchase of a used vehicle or a new one. I have checked with other communities to see how they handle this problem. The City of Buffalo and the City of Elk River don't have a problem, as their utility departments have bucket trucks. The City of Big Lake uses similar methods which we were using. They use someone in the bucket of a loader or they often stand a step ladder up in the back of a dump truck. Mike, flrom their public works department, realizes that they will have to make a change also. We talked a little bit about joint use of a bucket truck, and he indicated that most of their problems come on late evening hours or on the weekends; and if we had a joint use, they would have to have a key to our facility to come over here and get it or we'd have 22 to contract with them to do it and, with our short work staff, it may not be applicable or workable. Also, if the coats for the trucks are reasonable and can be used for other purposes, it may be best for each City to have their own. Copy of memos from Berkley Administrators: Copies of information on two Umcke that we had originally found but both were sold. 23 Berkley Administrators d -� . nr,sba at me Serldey Risk Management Services Group eU, we fi= aadarard P06=69143 Aeneas 5545 ataa (612)5"-=', March 28, 1995 S~ Q Mr. Richard Wolfsteller, City Administrator ` , ! Y"3 City of Monticello x`r 250 E. Broadway;{-` Monticello, MN 55362 Dear Mr. Wolfsteller: This letter reports on my visit and subsequent workers' compensation safety survey of selected portions of your city's facilities on March 23, 1995. The body of this report outlines specific and potentially hazardous conditions I noted during the survey and my recommendations for their abatement. General City Recommendations During my discussion with John Simola, Public Works Director, he indicated that a safety coordinator has not yet been designated. The Minnesota OSHA AWAIR program recommends that each facility appoint the most appropriate person within their facility to manage their safety and health program. This individual will oversee and organize all the components of the city's safety program. I recommend that the city work diligently to appoint one individual as safety coordinator for the City of Monticello. Also during this discussion, we reviewed the Job Safety Analysis fortes. li=topicaf traffic light repair and city decoration installation was discussed. It . was brought to my attention that employees ride in the bucket of the front end loader to repur .. traffic fights and install decorations. This practice must be ceased immediately. This could result !n wifreme kriou3wrorkefre compensation injury or even death. I recommend that the city 1 !strongly pursue the purchase of a aerial bucket truck or other man rated lifting equipment for t i—ese types ofoperations4 Maintenance Garage One of the breakers located within the breaker panel was missing. I recommend that the City of Monticello install a dead -man plate over the area where the breaker has been removed. carer r rwwrr...�rr.r w rp wn �w rr �.�.� r ww r w.r cur wry. wrM ar r• r'ea/ r r r.r. hMt r �rti r ear..nr� r M M eaa..� r rr� w.r. � err. wrrw .rrw r rwe w rr. a ier.r e. e..rrr �.� r...r a 4ww Sell -Funded Insuance SpedaWs M Etpad OPPOM0 ty E0 �I1.1t�A�Hi� LEASE AGREEMENT ANO INVOICE UHIUINAL LESSOR: ..�.R ...a.R1�.1...., N— Y INVOSCENO. R 6739 1HOMLLSEW1AYEm kI.AM Pp1STRIN,.ik tiDpRIGTOLAA SSIA ❑ IIORnaENN. DD® ❑RD. am '0 aD D®.5w. n7Y,PA IHm InnAo�E � REMIT t0: I A /RSR MAONPE RD w ❑.AwR,uStor ❑ EA/RMtO ROpMOODwY G ❑LLO1 aT.MERO I S0912-0749 wAAR$uwaw OMTIOTIENCmalMINNEAFOOS, Dlalalam PMIwAEw oonsm MN 5548E -07A9 L STpEET CUSTOMER ACCOIPIT NO OUT �/9S 9 CITY, TAT 21P ! TWE OF COMMENCEwENi 1 RENTAL BIWE RATE AMOUNT No PNGMi AALEENNI THa►1voR:Ecov vEROD NNIS OF PROPERTY OWNER' A O TO WX, O STREET AGME53CI PROPERTY el HpUR10E IE CIAeY IN a2,3D 60 ICOIYITY NOUIWETER (STATE IT OUT CICITY 13 LESSEE THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR ON TMq 481 HOLM OPEPATED R Y YES ❑ NO (—] (w -mr. am OIPORIIATWN BUM ErmA TUFT Cl/AROE T(MME DP GENE RAL CONTRACTOR I RA TES QUOTED ARE FOR S NR. DAY. 40 NR. WEEN CR 176 NR. HAILING N�ADOREB$ MONTH. MOURS IN EXCESS OF ONE ONE. SHIFT Wlll 68 AT R NEL 51XPNNp W$TPoVOTONS OP UMGrEC MATtl. EOUVMENT VALUE T:> L/�V REPAIRS (FOS fEY PURCHASE OPTION OVEN: M.Xc-' � ksas�.-•� MIOUkL /'� �s C]�j YES ANO w n / ND OPTn Am",Ie m au TEM �'}'7j� N�! E1 M�A0L'�T+S_ _. _ G_•J. TFHPE WPCMAAOPfON6 URGHN,BE PRICE WILL 69C(i� 'ORAL OP I/EH TAI PND. PLUS A CI . CARAYWO CMARGE COMPUTED Y` RM9.a.�� AT THEOUTTSTN u IpNG PWayAL STATE SALES TAE Y i1�. REPAWD TWD GYRASE EXPCH3H$�— A H \ ` M M � t TIS gj%CHAE@ IOCAL ENES TM { T Jr (RMS ND ORIGINAL OINAL TERM Sull IKANSI ALL RENTALO ARE TOTAL ?!IN sr 11 - PAYASLO IN ADVANCE LPA 980 z �/ \ OTNERIWI3E DTAiED. OELESS P'POO 7T1 /�Af�.`f IW1E Ip TAf EXIMPT CINfVG,SNO EAIt/ 9� ou JA Net ` SU13JECT TO THE TERMS AN000N01T10N REV 4W PAGE HEREOF. WHICH ARE MADE APART HEREOF AS IF FULLY SET POM HEREIN ABOVE. 1 HAVE READ THE TEND AMC C09011040 OF THC( UIAW AGREEMENT AND AGRES THERETO, UM GOIwJ��IAH; F_+AQYNrN.wYrw rXw...t!kL:ktT Gv �CI[I�IN iA` R Dome No. A 6739 �%8 GENERAL FUND 1995 BUDGET PW/STREETS 6 ALLEYS PERSONAL SERVICES Salaries, full-time - req: 101.43120.1010 96,775 Salaries, full-time - OT: 101.43120.1020 2,000 Salaries, temporary - req: 101.43120.1040 7,000 PERA contributions: 101.43120.1210 4,740 FICA contributions: 101.43120.1220 6,560 Medicare contributions: 101.43120.1250 1,535 Health/dental/life insurance: 101.43120.1310 15,400 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 134,010 SUPPLIES Clothing supplies: 101.43120.2111 750 Motor fuels: 101.43120.2120 10,000 Lubricants 6 additives: 101.43120.2130 1,500 Misc operating supplies: 101.43120.2199 20,000 Equipment repair parts: 101.43120.2210 3,000 Vehicle repair parts: 101.43120.2211 3,500 Misc repair & mtc supplies: 101.43120.2299 100 Small tools 6 equipment: 101.43120.2410 11000 Misc merchandise for resale: 101.43120.2999 500 TOTAL SUPPLIES 40,350 OTHER SERVICES 6 CHARGES Mise profoosicnal services: 101.43120.3199 1,500 Telephone: 101.43120.3210 375 Conference 6 schools: 101.43120 3320 200 Repair 6 mtc - mach i equip: 101.43120.4044 11500 Repair 6 mtc - vehicles: 101.43120.4050_ 1,900 e.. mow ^ -*101.43120.4170 _— c SaMAgplen500 1:900 Uni orm rbentalarntar Licenses 6 permits: 101.43120.4370 390 Misc other expense: 101.43120.4399 500 TOTAL SERVICES 6 CHARGES CAPITAL OUTLAY 6,325 Improvements: 30 1.43120.5301 27,30 ,.0�3�471]0:550.Li��[8 Other equipment: 101.43120.5801 23 -ii TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 61,000 TOTAL PW/STREETS i ALLEYS 241,685 oaivaar� vzn: 1 Q?C, ISSUE 1u) . v. .... . -- -F - fiberglass util. body, 6 new tires, about 114 the co more to choose from. J&M ENTERPRISES, 2960 Grand Rapids, 616.247-8423. (RM) (9517) R :'. r:X•. PAG ket, Kohler qen., st of new, 8.995 S. Division Ave., M-62015Rw31 Tn- 10.133 IF, �vce civ moo, coo 4 t3 �e4 ,es - --- - - - ----- - - . N cul A004' Ram atr Z %otue M+►a.. t%s A .�� ' _ .3Z} f %E. • Geo e�� ; ►tea ---_ _.._ . . D 2ND $TRE 5333 p HOPKINS, MN 553438337 3.8337 612.938.5451 Equ'ipment & Supply Inc. FAX 1-612.93MI 59 WATS 1-800.729.5451 Custom Truck Equipment for the Utility, Construction, Municipal and Refuse industries April 5, 1995 Roger Mack City of Monticello P.O. Box 1147 Monticello, MH 55362 Dear Roger, Enclosed are the photo's of the aerial lift we spoke of. This van is currently at the City of Minot, but they have not committed to buying it yet. It is available for $14,000. The truck came from Anoka Electric Coop. It is in very good condition and I can give you a contact at Anoka Electric if you would like to give him a call. I do not anticipate this truck being available much longer, so give me a call if you are interested. Thank you for your interest in ABM Equipment & Supply, Inc. Sincerely, C[ !b1 it bW W/LAA St v Ron Zimmer Sales Representative RzIsm SdrOV You Me bsdl nuns An Cu bwhmsa I f An EQw+ Y Empb er I I I 333 2nd Street WE Hoplon3, MN 55343-8337 PAI. 1-613-938-0159 FAX COVER SHEET PLEASE DIALCCT THE POLLOMIMG PAGES TOS Q P'A>C TF2ASASM28920N is , •�_'a • �+. �.. r-.9�� �/YU�/ r r 7io FROM 0.e.n 4Q.r�e-uy�� $L,(.60c) N6 io, O 1t-MsSAa c,. ,LA t b . NAA`V M PZ -MASE • Council Agenda - 5/8/95 18. Coffin ideration 91 uurchaes of reulaoement mower for the parka department. (J.SJ City Staff would like the Council to consider replacement of a 1985, 650 John Deere Tractor with a 72" belly -mount mower. In addition to mowing services, the 650 John Deere is used in the winter as a light duty snow blower for sidewalk and skating rink maintenance. It is anticipated that the 650 John Deere will be kept in service for winter use and as a backup mower for summertime. The City currently has three heavy duty mowers for park use. The John Deere 650 has been the most troublesome and is on its second complete mower deck as well as other problems. The following is a list of the three pieces of heavy duty mowing equipment: 1985 650 John Deere Tractor, diesel with 72" belly -mount mower, cab and snow blower. (2,260 hours) 1988 Toro Mower with 23 horsepower diesel engine and front - mounted 72" mower with rollover protection and canopy. (2,485 hours) 1990 955 John Deere Tractor with 72" belly -mount mower, diesel engine, cab, avow blower and broom. (1,650 hours) The majority of the repairs needed for the John Deere tractors lately have been mower deck and drive system related. Just for 1994 alone, parte for the John Deeres totaled $1,142, while parte for the Toro totaled $117. To obtain prices and general speacations, we took quotes on John Deere equipment as well as Toro equipment. Size wise, the John Deere &ont- mounted mower, model F935 with a 72" mower at $11,287.20, compares with the Toro, model CM223-D with a 72" side discharge front -mounted deck at $11,594. The Toro unit, which compares more closely with our existing Toro unit, however, is the model GM325-D with a fionbmountad 72" mower, this unit sells for $12,488. This unit offers a 25 horsepower 3 cyl. diesel engine, an industrial radiator (which is less likely to plug up with grass), heavy duty automotive type drive axle, single peddle hydrostatic drive, and four link steering. The deck on the Toro unit is extremely heavy duty, with 1-1/4" spindles and tapered roller bearings, reinforced spindle housing with 11 gauge steel decks with heavy duty gear boxes, gauge wheels, and anti -scalp rollers. The Toro aroundsmasters have a 2 -year warranty, and staff believes they offer the lowest life cycle total 24 Council Agenda - 5/8/95 cost and less down time than our experience has been with the John Deere mower deck system. With almost 100 acres in our park inventory system, total life cycle cost is extremely important. In preparation for this purchase, we placed an amount of $15,000 in the budget. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. The first alternative is to purchase the Tom Groundsmaster front - mounted mower, model GM326-D, from MTI Distributing Company in Plymouth, Minnesota, for an amount of $12,488 plus sales tax. 2. The second alternative would be to purchase the Toro Groundsmaster, model GM223-D with 72" firont-mounted mower deck, from MTI Distributing Company in Plymouth, Minnesota, for $11,684 plus sales tax. This unit is slightly smaller than the current Toro we have. 3. The third alternative would be to purchase the John Deere, model F935 front -mounted mower, from Scharber & Sons Equipment of Rogers, Minnesota, for $11,287.20 plus sales Lax. 4. The fourth alternative would be to do nothing at this time but to continue using our existing mowing equipment. GN GS sju oc C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director and Park/Street Superintendent that the City Council authorize the purchase of the Toro Groundsmaster, model GM325-D with 72" front -mounted mower deck, from MTI Distributing Company of Plymouth, Minnesota, in the amount of $12,488 as outlined in alternative 01. It is our opinion that this unit will provide the lowest life cycle cost with the lowest down time of the units we have looked at. We have several years of direct experience with both types of mower equipment upon which we make our recommendation. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of quotes from MTI Distributing Company and Scharber k Sons. 25 /lardi� MTI DISTRIBUTING CO. Tuesday, May 02, 1995 Roper Mads Monticeito d4' of PO Box 1 147 Monticello, Mn 55382 Dear Roger We are pleased to quote prices on the fol lowing 9*dprrent. OTY ESCRIPTION QUO 1 GM 325-0 72 In SO deck, M seal, and 4 post ROPS $12,488.00 1 GM 325-0 with 72 in Guardian Reeycier Deck, Dix seat, and 4 post ROPS with canpy $14,337.00 Note Add 6.5% State Sales Tax Equipment would be set up, serviced, and delivered covered under standard I you have any questions please cell me at 612-4752200 6d 228 sU,�erely, Don Mersdrnan Cwmwcisl Sales 14900 TW"-ftAvenue North • PtymouN, MWresota 514474855 •Phone (812)4752200 •Fax (812147 p SPEC I F I CATION S 72" EXXGM CAPACITY 7RIMMINC3 MOWER MINIMUM DEVIATIONS FROM SPECIFICATIONS SPECIFICATIONS ENGINE Mitsubishi, Model R3D-61TG, 3-cyl., 1 (DIESEL) 4 cycle, 69.7 cu. in. (979 cc) 1 displacement, water cooled diesel 1 engine, 26 hp at 3260 RPM, 3.6 quart oil capacity with replaceable filter, hand primer pump, heavy duty remote 1 mounted air cleaner, and extra large 1 spark arrestor muffler for excellent 1 silencing. 1 1 RADIATOR Mid -mounted industrial radiator with 1 tube and fin construction; 7 fine per 1 inch. 6 quart capacity. Stamped brass 1 top and bottom tanks. Thermally stable 1 water cooled hydrostatic system 1 regulates operating temperature. 1 I FUEL CAPACITY 6.2 gallons No. 1 or No. 2 diesel fuel. 1 I CONTROLS }lend operated throttle, PTO, glow plug 1 switch and hydraulic implement lift. 1 I GAUGES AND ENGINE flour motor, ammeter, water temperature 1 PROTECTION SYSTEMS gouge, high engine temperature shut-off,1 and electric fuel gauge. Oil pressure warning light and buzzer. Glow plug 1 indicator. 1 I ELECTRICAL 12 Volt, 660 amp, cold cranking perform -1 FEATURES once at 0 degrees F. maintenance free 1 battery. Dash mounted ignition switch, 1 36 amp alternator, 40 amp manual reset 1 circuit breaker. Seat switch, PTO and 1 trnction interlock switches. I TRACTION Variable speed, axial piston hydrostaticl DRIVE trnnomission mounted on an automotive 1 type axle/roarend, Dano OT20 axle - 1 20.9:1 ratio. Single foot pedal control 1 of forward/reverse ground speed. BAB 1 1OW30 SF -SC engine oil, approx. 6 quart 1 oil capacity. 1 S P E C I F S C A T I O N S C O N T I N U E D: 72" HIGH CAPACITY TRIMMING MOWER MINIMUM DEVIATIONS FROM SPECIFICATIONS SPECIFICATIONS I GROUND SPEED 0-9.5 mph, infinitely variable. I CLEARANCE Ground clearance 7.5". 1 TIRES/V/BSELS/ Two rear steering tires 16 x 6.50' 1 1 PRESSURES x 8, tubeless ribbed, 4 ply rating. 1 Two front traction drive tires 23 x 1 8.50 x 12, tubeless, 4 -ply rating. 1 MAIN FRAME All welded formed steel reinforced. 1 1 BRAKES Individual 7" x 1.76" drum type wheel I I brakes and parking brakes on front 1 traction wheels. Dynamic braking 1 through traction drive. 1 STEERING Hydraulic priority flow power steering. I I 15" steering wheel. 1 SEAT Deluxe adjustable suspension seat. 1 1 IMPLEMENT DRIVE 1-1/8" - 20 splined PTO shaft is driven 1 1 by n tight -slack double "A" section, 1 torque teem V -belt. Anti -side load 1 system proftecte the crankshaft output A bearings. IMPLEMENT LIFT 2 1/2" - lift cylinder actuates a T -bar I AND TRACTION of 2" square tubing with chains for COUNTER BALANCE implement lift. Two large torsion springs counterbalance implements for greater stability and traction. CERTIFICATION Certified to meet ANSI specifications I i 871.4.1984, and applicable Federal 1 • and State OSTIA regulations based 1 thereon. 1 WEIGHT 1250 lba. tractor. 1 I 1 I 1 ��C I SPEC I F I CAT I O N S 72" HIGH CAPACITY TRIMMING MOWER MINIMUM DEVIATIONS FROM. SPECIFICATIONS SPECIFICATIONS 72" SIDE DISCHARGE CUTTING UNIT TYPE 72" (163 cm) width of cut, three blade, mounted rotary. MOWING RATE Mows up to 3.8 acres/hr. (1.5hecteres/hr.) at 6.5 mph (8.9 km/hr) depending on conditions. TRIMMING Deck offset to the right from centerline: ABILITY: 18" (46 cm). Deck trim width from outside of std. traction tire to trim side -Right: 23" (58 cm). Uncut circle right: 15".(38cm); uncut circle w/use of wheel brakes: 0" (Rear discharge trim both sides). HEIGHT OF 1-4" (2.6-10 cm) adjustable front and rear CUT: in .5" (13 mm) increments. CONSTRUCTION 11 gauge steel, 6" (15 cm) deep with 2" (5 cm) step. Reinforced with 3.5" (8.9 cm) x 7 gouge channel. CUTTER DRIVE Iaolntion mounted PTO driven gearbox with 1.26:1 opiral bevel gears. "B" section belts to spindles. 1.25" (3.2 cm) diameter spindle shafts protected by rugged conical housing, turn on two greasable tapered roller bearings. A positive apllned connec- tion attaches pulleys to spindle shafts for high torque capacity. BLADES Three 25" long, (63.5 cm) long, .25" (6mm) think, heat treated steel, auction -lift blades. SUSPENSION Two front and rear canter tires consist of Al BASTER hard rubber and roller bearings. W1fisdLS Front tiros: 10.26" x 3.25" (26 x 8.3 cm). L#9 SPECIFICATIONS CONTINUED 72" 112GH CAPACITY TRIMMING MOWER O/PF MINIMUM DEVIATIONS FROM SPECIFICATIONS SPECIFICATIONS . 1 1 Rear tires: 6.25" x 3" (16 x 7.6 cm) 1 Deck counterbalanced by two torsion 1 springs. 1 1 ANTI -SCALP One front center anti -scalp roller end 1 FEATURES two rear center anti-scnlp rollers- 1 All rollero are two -position adjustable 1 1 WEIGHT 400 lbs. (181 kg) 1 1 CERTIFICATION All equipment bid must be certified to 1 meet the American National Standard 1 Institute's (ANSI) specifications, 1 871.4-1984 and applicable Federal and 1 State regulations based thereon. 1 WARRANTY Two yearn or 1,600 operational hours, 1 1 whichnver comes first. 1 1 OPTIONS 2 or 4 p not ROPS With Canopy, Cab W/RO PS 1 - BO " 2 Stege Snow Blower, Rotary Brooms, 1 (Mechanical or All Hydraulic Drive), 1 Slit Seeder, Wide Tires. Tire Chain, 1 Wheel Weights, Cruise Control 6 Arm Rests. I O/PF Groundstnaster 300 Series ��^ - ,r, .r. 'i!t 'R{ -i : �.i� :iT. :id a�i?::•i: ii 7.: '-. '?r .:.Yi«•,_'•,:ir'<1.:'�`i�rs.'. ;.•r!=ar`C: '>;,«:.`a:t-'•�:.:. n::�:. ^.w..+•!'" ,ssS';�f�i,�::��'{ �' _. .... +r-�I .."'' 1►i' „�. _''�• l}}.... tit-' �,�-� � 1 :.#...:.,. .. -' • , y .. I :c .L y �_��,% is .:u F�,�1,• '. ,l^ � '• ,t ` may`` K� . The Proven Performers For 30 years commernal mowing professionals have put Groundsmaster` 300 tines through rigorous tests against time and terrain. And for °0 years the 300 Series continue to t4• the preferred choice among these same professionals. They have come to rely on these commercial mowers to handle even the most extreme cutting conditions with unmatched productivity. The prolan performers. Long on durability. Tight on turns. With power to spare. Today the 3W Series continue to advance Your expectations in measures of reliability. efficiency and unsurpassed quality of cut. Whatever your situation or application. there's a Groundsmaster to sere your nmost demands. operator performance making the job easier, faster and ultimately more profitable. To that end. there's front wheel drive. rear wheel rower steering, single pedal forward. reverse action, a compact wheelbase and individual drum wheel brakes. All for incredihle. smrnlh tontrul and effonles maneuverability whether tnmmmg close. transposing or tradepiiag: 1 ?6 engine efficiencies and keep you on Power- the job. And routine servicing is so simple it promotes itself. Designed Packed to open wide with conveniently located. easy -to -reach components. Service life is optimized with saves you time and fosters proper these liquid cooled performers, servicing. gines, either r 45 hp—gas, offer t�,,'etplenty ofIncredible power. Thgas powerful 345 gas version has its power regulated and reserved to effectively increase Control torque and power while reducing noise and vibration. It also equips a Distributodess Ignition System for Groundsmaster design continues increased reliability and less to evolve m response to the specific downtime. demands of today's turf Fully pressurized lubrication, professional, even meeting futureexpectations. heavy duty air cleaners, industrial Tum understands that sized radiator and engine protection exacting control. superior traction systems go a long way to enhance and a comfortable ride improves operator performance making the job easier, faster and ultimately more profitable. To that end. there's front wheel drive. rear wheel rower steering, single pedal forward. reverse action, a compact wheelbase and individual drum wheel brakes. All for incredihle. smrnlh tontrul and effonles maneuverability whether tnmmmg close. transposing or tradepiiag: 1 ?6 Traction - Plus 'rracllon and stahl6t,• are the emphasis with extra large turf tree rues and. a cuounterhaIance system that automatically transfers weight between the deck and tractor when performance demands additional traction. For enhanced traction the . ._ - .t d6rRwescels in traction where competitive two -wheel differential lock fires can't. overrunning clutch that prevents rear wheel skidding in turns and ensures excellent traction, Operator Comfort llr-iding Groundsmtnh•r reraans with ewellent control the fatigue experienced rmm a lung day's nde And a wuJurtahlr Ipelalur's,lalwn arch e\allcnt ylslhlltty extents to :I m, stent �gvrat, lr rVn. IITna nee and pr,ductnn,' F,.r ultimate c. -mf -r tllc high team :u,hl„c ddu,e u,penslon seat Jdlu,ls :o ndnldual operator. "eight and length. Amlrc,t, am -rd relayed st;enng plus the ,teenng wheel tilt, 6n individual ,teenng rn•terence. a 2 Easy tlm��unt and dl+mount. ; unaurerrd Iri�hlr „tau�ln r•\:de,, ^:\.a GnN n„gym „rth Il,enwr t\\ 'I,ea:ej ',,-a k, and alnd-j'C%cv .,heel rumor. `:h.l Jrd'I„k n-gether .al—Th e\cn lI::kmg ^ et nil. panel 1:1-1 eJ`\ ' •eJd 4Jn9e1 N I rlt•111r4 ellr:lre Ilm.:lln, and h.Lt .r, . • „� J,.I,c ,t, enol �mr,.0 t , •,I�• rr,�dl..•iun "od ur” •I nnl•, 1.011 J, a:• 1I.1lrm,m i,,., •"JI', .ir,lhlllly 'a Versatile Cutting Unit Family, �i��n�s GrotntJmas0.'1 -:.. tii�lr! ,•t�e.ti (.h.i aargr l Utitn„ i Ilit> hace a 1 Olin( �.Il iot cutting til ...ear ai1J a, speed+ tit;t: -id l i,110hlc hutlt With i i gau•'Se ,trel o,n>truan rt, hrall'Juh sputdlr h„uan} •. <phnrd spmJh tapered ndler hearing. and '•: eIJrJ blade tlloc deiiis are mr,re ruslged, Tgwir It'ss sen'Icing and klm I-,nger. 1)ptmtall} dessgneJ. a deep ,i l mJ Tunnel' hou.'Ing .md thi ec n Jl>pr si„n - at no lo,, ,,f _i Madcs create super -T 1'acuu m ipced. ,,calm for a smooth. evocut. F. w .• did rl.:hhar deck caster cci>:•pamize gro,:nd toni,ntr Fine Cut Flail 2760 Named (,,I it, high ouahty I -til and etcepti„nal ..tet; iag harattrrrtrs.'G m's Fin,' I. i'i:oi :.,, .e+,r;hrahrrnatae i+a nt ,%vim your mrmai and semi t-,rmal turf Th, d76Gi pernam> with„ut dualling, rnrt even III h••hes ,.••t gra- dtrJ rtsfull width rear di�chatge etuthet enl atico after -cut oppeatance while it also nta4,rs f,.r sa}vt ,�pelaU,me. But I, ver�atilitt marhe its greatest adl'antagc. The time mower that delivers you a praiseworthy tut can serve to I :aip prim to rnerseeding, hrca” up ,It r: tmn .ores or mulch Iran' to v.ithm it the hr,sls -.1 chartgn,t, adding attachmL nis. L,II,.s ing. Ssalpum Is %-Irma;}; eLminatedwii"annscal-, fc;:tures like rn•er>ized aria>caip roiiers and adnivahie �ktds. I' • a .ih 1—tof,• -t'lle Il; +flnotml: hla , n-- Lull to `0 i4 ^reg',ni `,*,.1 11, TA i,tltg Hnt•I,r e•41 t, •1•,,f: .cl, Groundsmaster 300 Series Specifications" (continued) GROUNDSMASTER ACCESSORIES 2 -POST ROLL-OVER PROTECTIVE STRUCTURE (BOPS) STATION CUTTING UNITS (continued) Pour PralK Slr `tt" (r IS MI . 7' 17 6.—, FILATURES ' SIDE DISCHARGE. MODEL 70722 OvWem Twos COM 9+ ftVuO l R*Mvab0 ovw— WEIGHT 2•Pow ROPS 175 ibo 101 kg) Canottv Kd IoPIWG • 90 GUARDIAN' 72' RECVCLER', FINE CUT FLAIL 2760. 4•POST ROLLOVER PROTECTIVE STRUCTURE 72' REAR DISCHARGE, MODEL 70710 MODEL 70716 MODEL 48590 Poll—Pp ttt,*StntCOaa cwt bot rte WXbf ^T Dw othial to its rgn km can Aftw IrDaCM 011e�i 0M NM I— C vlft. r (18F ad .MIM M arts nil 1— _aebon NAW mo' or"Hunt. Ana rood CuoOC^ 14E ani. OKk t— wdtn ftO outdo of =I. DIC% torn wM Iron pRsde 01 arrtan cwenrw 4 5- (11 Cm). Tm TRIMMING alnrtaan trxnort tom hied; Mee — nam 27' bn w trop ode — Vtta Zr 156 and Un troth ttom oMde . of treme a ASILM 158 an). U—ti arch —.9m: 15' (78 an), arae rpm: 2a' 161 and Urtcul rnaa wmt uM "to ngM tka: 17(70 on) WEIGHT ~ oral. Unad arca wvat uta d es 0' ol x2;0.1 btak— 0' Gaa.man 72' ROCyClor Lot" o.ae w rate Pae 28' (B=,Z. roma boot Edea). aal t-6 on both s4aa 172 Cm) FLW 2760 trent on Dot" uda0 14. (25 - 10 cm) adptade Irbtd OW mar m2-5* IS 1 - 12.7 an) adpstaVii itaa Md ear 0+ (0 - 10 an) aqustaDle 5't 17 mm)-um"-th.)rote on ate nS'(t7—) —&—ftwW.oK wtea "MAM rear -.5'(17 mm) HEIGHT OF CUT otw tt" ea c0smr snafu. r IS and neem ol cd ttol vtcrwltrKa . h ap mii - rommnrrdao ~ a m oxwq the 1r 1 case' shaft and two pondaKwN cats an ar ear mDM. No" 70722. 11 gauge It". 6' (15 and 12 gaups at". 5.5' (1a Cm) 0M.waloaa 10 gauge ataal Wusvtg win 7 sp a*lar 2' (5 Wn) Rao. P wftnAd wth 7.5' rn trucbon 19W -Ad +rte 10 99,90 gauge areas. WHOM CONSTRUCTION (8.9Cm10gauge Cham". cnenr+0ls ant paw, rAn.bll Vadatpatl wdh 10 Mtaa17071P 11 gauge at". a' (10 an) gauge ol—tals ant o"M GM I MWQ. Rautmrnd wth 73' . 7 gauge Cna". Hol. w mwnn PTO orlven gwoo. snot leolot n MOLMN PTO mtven WV*O..wth PTO tree n 1:1 rMq ball 12S 1 Wal b" Tan 'S' hal aet b 1 26 1 tarts itgAAre. Swgm 90' &*=A gel b Two N axbon balm boot N tpldN. 125' 17.2 Cm) tawN rte. ben to ap—l". SM•terte 91" 10 =u. Saa•t&eP0i g 4.110 Coto" aMN, pWecNo by n conew pWao 1.25' (7 2 =) *aM* W WnW0 wt,rnarrtamr diet P+Amy CUTTER ORWE 4pod'i Wang, tum w 1wb rpesaaama an.ft, tum on Iwo gtamal";.)alts'ober 125' (7 2 —) patlwlW mm2 taared rats oeamgs (weaseabla ftp" too DMrnp (graacoabm tr lag of .CF). A anon one on greasaaba ball al a ) A Pos,bve sF01Ma conneCoM Douai" "Pt. 1ad MrvtaOTtbn anacros Pubs" bean"); .near. punaye m .WO..haft tar rtgn toque Capably to apwtale waft ft .p torpua "Itamy BLADES TMM 25' 164 Cml mrtp. 25' 1S —1 ft". Tone 25' (64 an) lug. 25' 16 ren) thck 14 nam "amt hoe PwUN re ?.nMtvo MMI ouuat4dl pari Mu•trOpteo a". PKytlw Oman lmna grabg O 2X10 pm Two mord Wo nal crew moa ;.anted of Kora lobar wo rCaOr ti—p puck CMAS'niamoo t- 10' . 7 25'(25 . 8 7 and SUSPENSION • tly Ma Iortim spm) Opnonw P tAM VR l a Te Aseempy tit Kan tlmbw Cmter CASTER P N +21509 (too Mawr") whaaN bei -45 qRw bega WHEELS Fqm Tim Raw Tit- F4t countorpMatrAd by two Meats. 30722 A 70710 ;0000'.7255 21.667 m) 62!'.700'116.796m: CootwvgFul woth ear Meow707111 0072 257m 07 SW 205m rode, Moat 377t D: One ft" Center wW.Cam AnWx Cup WC Cao on oast 040 Thr ami-SCato aloe bcateo on ANTI -SCALP rout' Ono 4n al -r ikda Moots 70722 SMD0 111P 'bale Ada lltb" oda each art to um. Fus want FEATURES ane tmm. ., rd mA rep C.K--liCalc ra— at ear wm 0M."C a rp4n aro RH wd I' 12 5 an) be -0 AD'bean ua 2po aquolaaa DECK COVERS Owo1•r0iu.a Caen kb woo mW co to Ouo "=, hgn vT000 Pta=own" No Ba:latn- rewove mws rppunpd to rMrlwe - _ . _470 WEIGHT MoW 70722 amret 1181 k9: A6s me (211 Rg) -- ft (213 kg) Moots 70710 a15 ma I+IM kp) GROUNDSMASTER ACCESSORIES 2 -POST ROLL-OVER PROTECTIVE STRUCTURE (BOPS) STANDARD Pour PralK Slr `tt" (r IS MI . 7' 17 6.—, FILATURES Ira gau00 w.d0a Rddglteal ban am anaMN OvWem Twos COM 9+ ftVuO l R*Mvab0 ovw— WEIGHT 2•Pow ROPS 175 ibo 101 kg) Canottv Kd IoPIWG • 90 W owaoe Sworwg on Iyer WON aM Wio Mat hoar ala 141 491 .Son.-Aw 4•POST ROLLOVER PROTECTIVE STRUCTURE ELECTRICAL WITH SUN ROOF STANDARD Poll—Pp ttt,*StntCOaa cwt bot rte WXbf ^T FEATURES avc Sun roar wm 1' I2 5 Ml Aragb=l real WEIGHT _aebon NAW mo' or"Hunt. Ana rood CuoOC^ WEIGHT 250143 111741)) wwwo ream "'N o LKFe K0 w rr.wntl.0 not" rNtDar OPTIONS h hm Ana DN rota wa"lgnb Iwo Combno; c't a0't1�om12 tt;.go .uut--,•-•w y,n way 22"}2.1 Md WAql.a "CwtbpD rd.w4'n pYOi CAB WITH BOPS Roo-" PgmCb1.O 6lttctuto CMI boll AM Anxnrg STANDARD OvWem Twos COM 9+ ftVuO l R*Mvab0 FEATURES OW wad Ipueg hartSe V 12 S —1 atmtcxdl root W owaoe Sworwg on Iyer WON aM Wio Mat hoar p•7rtol, "" 010v ft r Ml nEew 001020' m t* Mo ELECTRICAL Two 1400" One notes -W W" 40Wwtp atttbp FEATURES can't; oahOclO, Nn w CCrnAto wow wrap Na % and Ng-J:O awuuwt WEIGHT WO t3 It67 kgl OPTIONS koala U Road L74 Kd h.0 CpabN WN 4- rvta-,-17'N a-,- 1"mnrwa iwpaa.g h .N.W. ,d -q 48' (122 cm) SNOW BLOWER. MODEL "910 DTANOARO a0't1�om12 tt;.go .uut--,•-•w y,n way FEATURES Wccmm aa'N taxa. rAKnCaay ban er appRlp o Wt• te0 WEIGHT v 400oa 1181 k9) Groundsmaster® 300 Series Specifications* (GROUNDSMASTER 1250, 2 WHEEL DRIVE — DIESEL. GROUNDSMASTER 115, 2 WHEEL DRIVE —OAS. MODEL 10789 GROUNDSMASTER 2"."i WHEEL DRIVE — DIESEL, MODEL 10795 F. + C ....... cvm,wwnetw were, 4.0coo w g.. qv. Mawbrw. ] CyknoAl. a cyC* varxal wwftsao v . kala coo4a nim can,Nupal+ater Purm Fw" orgm ramp a 4 m(33 6 kW): W); aral anpm.rml n mdugM water Pro. 25 m 118.6 kW) 1I 2850 pwlmeo la • ra..nu11 speed 011250 "Pt" 67 a n 1 11 00 al rpn ratan.arm Pd la a mlarklrrh wan d 3 250 rprn . a aolacwrom Dgtrloaanest y)ru sywam, wan q controw 111' a S9 7 eu n (979 a) CIMPlaanlarll Than wan ueul pbr au9a 12 CLS Sona wort tccmarx nv&Ae. 3 5 awn (3 3 marl W cap"; wln 12 0 WA gow MMci mei parts tori wltanod Facey kohCenpn ENGINE 1t cta ft a law %otaGtae two Lan Forpea CbuleCVp ruts. v+m Iroopa Pip 1.5 atop (3.3 Mas at caac+y: raphcaaUk a cut .On 6ybtpar "m oto tlbck momar al Itcil pm near Duty Wqr FoFW cc, *M p rpm. Caw ilei CybrOw head and bloCk Fut remora mpumw as daprtw. Span —w moll,. n SAlhpata •Vtcwrl pip 12 ten o1Kvc tuel Pop wit atacmc kW wino Rtp,acenk; W heir/ ziw aparwb vat 3 m fmawn popo- awh la waw rtnb w H" duty. rwnote mora a wr mow Spin ammtr n.AM o "'",a FUEL CAPACRTy c 5 pa�0rn 12A B Meryl umaa0ea gawknt - 6 5 paAPa R+ 6 hen). Td0 l a 2 oeSM heel. -- — CONTROLS 'rarowpwalta trOt'.r. CrtaS. PTO lryaat8c unpile- 411 am RarhOopwwAO Gnome. PTO, hyanultc mpMmwa M uta !cal-opwplaa won Dada1 laago•rbat AaCaarh pedal GAUGES S Amnww, t-, n taw P.D.. ""m rmporanre twnthyhpe Antm.w n0l+ rales. Ik+al Pupa COaare rampentun sl.tcnpav9a DMONOSTICB lcrwtw owe -alanyl. p0 pntoure.armn9 kpht am ouzzw (O?+waa orearabpI. cm Friar vwn g kpm arra buzz. ply.. ptup twNN.gcata 12 voo oabarV, 370 amp. cola crag ,V pM--, NO F (-ta CI Maw. tray 12 .on bm" 630 tip. cab uar" ELECTRICAL Dam nlotw,M, Ito ewntoh. 55 orb epernatpr Sal PTO dna ptnamama at 0 F (.18 CI Dash ri, n pnpen e.mce 35 amp FEATURES Vacutln uner&.Ck twNCtoa. aatnim b VM M11-81 mel aCLl btakw Seal. PTO aro trOdM .0plack Swchot WEIOM Apap. 1.300 M 1380 kpl oY wa1Vn M.M 307U AM- 1.250te 1567 k91 ay to Moral 30795 bap. 1.665 Ea (755 41 CIV�: vtc clas ROPS SPECIFICATIONS COMMON TO GROUNDSMASTER 300 SERIES PRUE MOVERS RADIATOR Lto.-0ua -game, raaata with tlae am M comYwctw 7 hrm pa nM A=m, 6Oran 15 7 btoo dewy Saito" top ata 001,0- tante nT rryaaukC Cwtc,, n 1pww Lank TWma7t Sino* welt, Cpolea hycl m SytLam "Lem aDor+b9 larnpw (tmuau aawna0yl VANDIO tpetla a.la wW paten, myab mei w t.awnaegn. awgo c—t,I hymauW vm 25 naC.ar Ufaton patao hyatWc "m fit, 00 0, Ana .mbrrtON tor, Tnrdm:Non meat w ams ane 20 9.1 toaU law. awro 5 mo 14 7 wr) oft kocam ce%my Snple bol naw Cb1aa TRACTION DRIVE w tawansfP prawn weed 011ealal Vomt nc Cmo,to Ceara K0, Moot 30677 sv&Wo Ltem) 30795 Rea a.lo m maChatKWy amort rrom hone ane ty a urkv.aw waft M 0rt,arnano owrwtwp nice prap'tnLa rtnr bra ew"mp m tuna arta -a.Aaro W—V ,paw AVV O 1 8 a+an 11 8 Merl baa IL&tCmn Caaxzy IMPLEMENT DRIVE 1.1 8 (2 9 Cm) wkma PTO Shalt o"n by t IQM-V ck OoLd*'A' "Cbon.,abut Nam y.pae An wwoM loo ayatem praoM the _ AND LIFT CrankanM OLdN boaapO Let cvw4r 2 5'- 3.25'16 A . 0.3 and actual» a T -ow at r IS mi aquas su ct.N k&N Lath wnvaam aaam.rp Chan ICr .-,pari aft. Twp Larpt IOrctOn Woo wUVOtbaLarttt .rb oro Ib proaWt Watt" Nia nctw Hyaauh[ pamw woamp w IontrO waw am --army toxon whU rOphwbb Port tm mPIMa caw to 9* mip comcw SLaw.p valva.^ STEERING rtaturta prbrl7 now wn.d+atwmaxaay port to aim" It—bait, 13' 133 C -I a�mnMr wo.rp r.nIFR Tm 61amp wrlpa wm+a 15 -rpt pr mp.wmm rertw0 and Inc" ov a woo la.w COrwd GROUND SPEEN 0.95-M(0.15,3 kmT). ddmcty nram CLEARANCE F�ap aoula cW rartca of 7 r (19 on) Meat 30795 roc brae- acaatn a A r 111 ml Tva Imnl Trecwn amt ata — 22 r 950.17 tlDOlaa. etre badmt trbn0, agly relay Ourltlsgnbb atop cape IarhO " —_ ' TIR[SaeNCH W TM MOM aw — IAwaM 307899076616 r 6 r`..GB. alOtpaa. ttab0 Ma. +alr retry MC0030795 18.0 50-0. ItA)OMOS. entre PRESSURE paCtan tnao. nary ramp. Tn preaVaO 21 pot (1+5 kPa). Opaont were woe bm W rim 23 . 10 W 12 ilDaalaa. agcy ralrp. Port N0 62.7020 Irtm OCplKtdb w7rn uaAp lalibp tM "ft 30710) MAINFRAME WoMcl CamMOM weal W40rtta with Satao Cm reaarpteat ttmnp !RAKES Ulatmua r . 1.76' (17 S .4 t MI ohan type .mew t-koa. Ptrk.p awe w ban now w h.W dynein burp rm ph aotLOrl anw BEAT Obwtwl Ho OdCk CjSNW mol. MOW 30708. a oakaa OquaaOM atuptntorh Sal Matt 307" 16aaI Ada" 141, Moat 30709 r.q oo .. nM ]0772) ? STORAGE uemo. ww 10.11 town Caw Iom%KJ n Nnmr Oprator macaw alprlpo taw turnSlra to taecrhmer m eat trPno. --- COMPARTKPM wAARANTT Trq yotm a 1500 opt ab" hen rtxlrvor cora Wa. Ratty to IM apprepnna OrrV,inp31V300 gala Clporamn' Ma.W to turogr .Aro CERT61CAT70M Oratnaarrm:ror 300 Derma pr.rw -nary am rOSpry 10ltatp tM ore CtMra m met ar Anrtxyt N+taW SLampm bbtNlat S (ANSII t.WCOtVm, 071 4•193D am ap85c0b1a fico" aro State mad=am ba.w arta FULL FLOTATION CU7TIN(l UNITS (ffIDE DISEHAFiGCM00TE77 OUARDIANe 72' RECVCLCAr', FINE CUT FLAIL 2760, 72' REAR DISCHARGE, MODEL 10710 MODEL 20716 MODEL 44590 72 1103 cm) -0 of W. Ihmt blade hart 7r 1103 an) v m" a CW e.p dpi few W 1152 cm) wxh of cul. I" kry , ,wh% TV W n r•.:un,paMaoe lw ,pay G.0 ronnmpe —,coo ,elan Rocycwg capwa4 caw m a 7]00 rpm trod ,~ Ira Rea .e.DwcD.cly 0-p" nn(ar0. MOWNG RATS IAOwa w to 30 ac—?v Il 5hac-t:o, hrI W S 5 mph IS 0~w) MCwap rate* ocwow m Mea up to 21 aaata 1125 h"i"bla ccalarm 51 not (a 9 km71r) Lwwwp Lab m omemra a vtt.A71e L�aoq wit � kG.0O Cn.'G. w+1ul rkX. �K DISTRIBUTING CO. Tuesday, May U2, 1995 Raper Mads mol cello city of PO Box1147 Ma tmelb, Mn 55382 Dear Roger. We are pleased to quote prices an the following equipment. OTY�� J�r��T DESCRIPTION QUOTE 1 G with 72 in side dW&wpe deckdtx seat ROPS with canopy 511,584.00 Note Add 8.5% State Sales Tax Equipmerd would be set up, serviced. and delivered covered under standard manufaehrres warranty If you have any questions please call me at 812.475-2200 Ext 228 Sinom ty. n Don Mereehman Commercial Sales 14900 Twemy-first Avenue North • PlyrtlaRh. Minnesota 55447.4855 • Phone (812) 475.2200 • Fax (81 2) 47 S1 8� min WOND Groundsm2tter M -D 2. It heel Dyke with 0' Side Discharge Deck Groundsmaster M -D 4411 heel Drire with Guardian v 62 "R.rycfcr M Power of Choice 14 owerful Grounds er teatures a r w e _3J .,'. �yfinuer �iuuotsnt we a engine. The Groundsmaster 324 with its 24 hp Mitsubishi gas engine pro- vides you with the durability diesels are kr mown for, but with more power. Both give you all the speed id power needed for the most oenanding jubs. Operator Comfort Groundsmaster 300 Series tractors combine convenient control features with an incredibly comfortable operator station to positively influence a tireless, productive operator performance. A high back seat with optional armrests and deluxe suspension ensures a smooth ride all day long. The mid -mount radiator draws air intake behind the operator serving to keep his or her environment cooler. Easy to see instrumentation. easy to reach controls and a relaxed single pedal operation of forward d reverse speeds contribute to oigh productivity. Special standard features of these liquid cooled performers include a high temperature shut down protection system, a low oil engine light and buzzer, a heavy-duty remote mounted air cleaner and a mid -mount industrial radiator— for the durability and long lived performance Gmundsmasters are known for. Groundsmasfer M4 with 52' Side Discharge Deck Standard 23" tires provide a fast transport speed, a smooth ride. better curb climbing and more traction -assist with accessory use. Super wide tires with 10.5" tread are optionally available for even more flotation and side hill stability. Groundsmaster® 200 Series Specifications* �GROUNDSMIISTER 223-0 PRM1E MOVER — DMU-0 OROUM)WAADTER i"1;61! MOVER — OMSEL a WHEEL ORNE. MODEL 3=0 MuWtsm MOM L3E-61TO, 3 cAnder, ran. A cycle, kprd=0Wyea,en¢w 23ro(172kVy):gWv Wm■ mumu. SPna a 7200 sVn. 50 09 m n (932 ul I hPec.m.re. Famed k&cabn ay gm Pr1m. ANaierbW Cmm0u9w 1xrerrlar. 12,0e (1 a kW h e"mcm E7GNE (Irrsemnty") luta POM dh 140LALl" Nter. R.PaCeabr w me h.enr wpere9or .m17 male UWW. 12vn(1.61.W1 War-. Wavy ady remota ..reed er dear-. SMa1 ad KOer. Ho WM nnOdewre $W -dc rn Mt M. (Opcnoc Spark Arrumr fiM . PIN rA=. ) GRDUNDSMASTER 224 PRWE MOVER—GM MODEL 3O72a L1u-b1 . 3 CY•near. A Lyda, Aao1 omm. vOtw a—mm vaM. ges* w -w* em1 Cam bjgw esMr Piro. 24 to it kM; DPwneo to • maAAlllrrl AppAs al I= rpm. 49.3 m n. 190E W motamr-a FPtao k&cxw Or gm pxnp k molal alemmWgMpowror, l2vow.skmoscn (Vww. rt j toll WIM wm1 nPacube rerw IaLM_ 12,012 (11 kw) genet. MU" aM —M mareed W daark- Swn ad ta.r Tu.M w elallbn.ypa wo t.rnp.has M -Cl newiYh. (OpbW t Speak ArWW Savem PM rs-e 01 FUEL CAPACM , 6 S 9•1b, (322 ku). IMM f". 1 DS palm 1322 W. uYrded µMr GAUGES A OGPIE Itw mem. hrM µuge. mwnpwaaR. pope. A p I MPO r *. tYN µuDe. 4rtprreve PP. 3 42 •ammo PROTECTION da W gauge ae wasa m w.- IanOr.nrr. lege aro dlucer OWP: 00 preaMaa. wM Ma9eearr0 aro WIW3 Hgh SYSTEMS pbr MQ Hvp1 er IWrua..a M -don wWH t.mPerAtun W.A4W- RAOMTOR ; Aea.n, me rrusmnl nLt= r Cdufittamk 7 aro Pw m . APa 6 aan 13.7 a.n Capecty. Renate elolrm I WM IAS Wen e>mW w,k. HV&M nc Uq" tmrlarmPn wen a'De peau Cana CO b.v.alren.ea Tana local 23 maon.eCauaon tam. Ah acne n rourkor.or ^y*CM C aMrl116fbn: WW cane W pP 12••rv10 aro q v.Ma. ApPp. Io.rAon aApoCal A '11RACTON DRIVE *AM is 7 neral. MPOM 10243. RW ad. a tnea wetly Pen from Ala Axis W a —W amt An un•dnrrld mwlnrq OAM 0rovwM rear an Ku" n Iwro ea ttlNo= ft -V rpOA. Wrr a n 2+ "Orme mode. Am. 1.9 DOA 0 a Wan pW 1kAaWd Capecdy. GROUND SPEED 6,OmP1 I,a,kmm.). r'6W.M wrrae. CLEARANCE Fen Taus 0 Wnr e0 1'(152 con). Mehl 30243' .ear 9mum aocimce 014 3' 11 tan:. MAINFRAME AO.abep brmp.tod MESIVYNE[lDl T.P "m tram- a.— a.. — 23 . 6 6.12..1 oarouenaA —A. PRE6fURD T.O roar W.eeV arca. ItleOeta 30723g072A —,E . e sal. MaON 3@O —, E . 6,SOd AO PrM An koelaa aro Ay/l two. Re[Prvn.roiq cop omen.: 20 OP I,>s kPa) Oa1am Wme Tre w/Rm 2] . 10 3.12 Pen W 62.1020. BRAKED kbvdlml r 1 1 73 (� 7 e Cm . A A On) Pre type wMM tlr.ka AIW 01n•q orate an.We Ir.CPn MV.Ie Dy.lstic OreY/p PrPgn vaaan amro. STEERM 1ryaalec po+M ma—M 13' (3] —1 W. -V weed I1APLEYENT ORN! 1'12 S an) a ngW costa PTO he O V.0 try a 1 Mw"ln.0 11A' e0aan V -b a PTO AVaW by .%wc CSm bm. Cavloetxn b rraNm.n w en A Okw.1a pre arm toNkmwV WW aavrnbtl — _ LMPLEMENTUPT T.n nyor•1GC rykrbontosrme kn .ma ---_ CONTROLS Foolvoo m Damon as Oroko P.hn MAlv-0PWWw promo, CMC*$ PTO Gwen a W1 . PW W. -0~ bet low. MODEL 3096" W10 pnaon s.m1 IM10een ]0227 0!543 naw P. 049 PAech aro. ants) ELECTWAL 12 vn n1nr1NnW1aP Trp Partm • 630 cola Cramog mm W o' P (•1a' C). 43 l -who ntaww CWxay M N' F 127' Cl FEATURED 40 anb a wl m -m I C mg-mtnreah.r Seal -vm. PTO .ro tr! ntwwm arWl'ho Eery ao:eaa Am Palkal ROUND LEVEL 900DIA) W aWWW o ea. anon -z, epaplmp WWa , .m vary 000y daDnaeq w 010 Due CERTtFtCARON Gamed.. ;;;Mo Amrn'an Na.aWSW;;WmlrClOo.(AWTOPp.aa.ona. 071 C 1900AM ap'=N Feonkl AN 3-.. e.N .0wew nary 31ae .elpaaana tYLxO hrOP1. WARRANTY Tw y.Y WOO warm" Rote, to w'W—W me O.arGlrne.te --w 6— Op.remr. mw%o w k - htW. FULL FLOTATION CUrW4 UNRD Ir SIDS OMCNA114011 W' RISA OOIDC�NAROD I 6r DIW DIOCNAROD rr WO OMCNAR09 WD MODEL 3096" 1 YOgEL 705N IgOEL 2DE7D , MODEL 3mm 67 1132 mlcm al as 67 1157 m). am a OA, rr f+nani•ty d OA. ar 1167 anl.ml al all. TTM 3040. Iron rrblruod 3-Oboe,.PV . %x~ 3-.. e.N .0wew nary Sm, has moueta0atary l MLyy nA1.1' R.LKyan0a6Y.ty rM1ro Mwmwgt acrooalr 'I{' Aao.awb]A �CraN1r MownbpA040=Awlla Md.e1pm3e&mft1rni MOWTNO RATS^ I l , tl.curpaM at rJ a mon . MLm.Oa'Ivl W 66 mW McxaeMM M 6 6 myl p 0 lww &%) W 6 0 mon II O t 116 krrMq _ 111 10 0 knNq . _ _ _— ' ODP aACm Inrr1 aut'LO d r 0.e, abut hon a0W d De[e dW trmn adP10e of Oa oboe, b re low [.r.pl• .eaM m I.n arh.roo card t] rn Inn ado Ir Meda rR mm Ph. tr In r ism) Deck an erml TRIIWASAJTV 10 25' am7. I41 ml UKut COCA M. (b Ce L%om V"ML 14' 1 Rm 0,05a a cm =m we e nz U III.MI Wad CeM (311 CIN M1cwCro. we I ma.n u0.—WI. I7(13an) Unca .1.1 u d nal." wdn WS Of n WINO M1pd Ire a.Owd" .heal UncaPwa vW. zr IR C" ~bake r hrMN r bae. r I U.101 t10e«m V:_0 d moo "—U om tet an to 0.0q. L 'lbarxun M awp Iraa PtrleP.eur.orc. rA O •+.a..a.rr. AmMieCnOCb1. oy Groundsmaster 200 Series Specifications* (continued) FULL FLOTATION CUTMNG UNITS 37' SIDE OISCNARGS 1�OF130.S35 OUAROIAIP 62• 5r REAR DISCHARGE er S106 DISCHARGE 77 N>SC/1/1ROE MCYCLEAE YODEL am MODEL 30564 YODEL 30373 YODEL 30360 Aalustabis n .5• (+3 mm) naenWw by npmWMkt9 raerb Dee naldt9lM Gaol . t.5' m 4S (3A m t 1.4 an) nrs08e1d loom CJrtIM hams TOW Ma Gfkf7. 100 Of cut range: 1'10 4(L5 To 10 1 en). � aG)WeW trW ally nW n s MOM 3056111 ordr. HOC ripe of r to 33• (7.5 Cm to 6.0 an). 03 mm) noertrnb wh HEIGHT OF CUT apaOls Wdr raw alrlb, t.s (3 a an) 11800 of as nol m uMa saws aa:rq Conditions. Model 30333: 12 gaups 12 gas bmwd aha waded wel cwmmxgon wM 7 gauge 17 gage tow r (10 an) l onned stem tonmuglon wlaad eOOan braakala. 5 (12.7 nun) OW Wn6TunlMe am.+MOeO coMfii9ul am nteg snlcvesl rloa. housi Q rgtloigO wM 12 gauge 7 gape wabea rgpon amnneb and 10 gauge pWp. EnCmm 5.112.7 an) OM COIDTRUC710N Wn6TWWM*hasap. No" 30330: 12 Tim lamed aro welop aermwool w1d1 7 gape welded 111400M braaam. T (7A an) dow PTO Shsll emM1, aalabon tnae0ad gplOw Wm1 riGn wipe a" b" Sesta. GeBom laOHbn nrurm PTO won PMy dMp a woo •AA• section bad in 3 Wlra wdawmlaro a0 a rubber lam er gaubm we 1.26:1 qww aim and -staid Stam killer plsey wail a"" MOW Teel and branip. Each I' (" an) Davin gem. SWISH •M• diameter blade ayes slid 03 erlaladea In • rloniraa7 SOPMW call can 7lo1W^g with seam IIs bad to spsea. lagrW toe, 0 ...P pease .Stam 00 lop. Oma P1sN spwHd to epalde Brat 0ta0a Stam ear PMI's. V (2.5 on) CUTTER DRIVE adapeM wabea TO spulaa mrd. Mawr baft bataa to etYPa and ayes. Orin" spkloH shaft luta on Iw grweabH HOeraa mar doming+ (Wuseslya bdm lap of cool A Paan" spa ad OW"Cl oil atmare PA&P to sows shaft To, ragh IOrdlr caosm T,vm lr (46 coni %t T)m 215'(55 =) Will. Thae 21.75163 =1 lore TNM 21.73' (55 an) bhp. SLAVES 2.r (6.3 ant wIN. M: 2.5163 Om) rifle. H: 2.5(8.3m) wads. s4• le _i era. nevoawed 15 mm) lira, hasl•bpmd 15 —) disk. halo naeW (5 —) lick, hasm4 rated at",. Gu~ Re clem Sten blade, meal blades. ares aedw blacks Mover Oe" m apwoW n pemrpd cane trams. Hatsllt a ma Mocks Ow r aha Mamie Dee norm a.=w ftd by . CARRIERcarter Trani annarcw Cu" unit Notation and stand Whass, m00bwy 14) a 120 Cmc ser wow FRAYS Optwrd Its spO-wan www WSPEKSION bam-9 Rea c=m Haus PalerOee mawM1 olawn, Pnou n oc, 5 (20,3 an) Oa Ratak. r (7 6 ant woo. bun tread tura mounted an P (10 2 Stn) Tie has aro toter GLUM mm. CASTER WHEELS wlrols .m+spewaeEle miles baku and hoM duty aWlpa tOW on a rapleeawH 6• a 3 5 (2O l e 0 an) mala speniter, 100" PhOMM Caster Whisk Aaaemay. PM 27.1050: two mime.) of rota rubow and sgrawwm -11- baeny, fir RD 57 SO er SD 77 SD Am kc%p ao located on pal Tao: man raWa r v v v �a ThMe ana�b Hama AYTFSCALP Tad rear r>re0w a0. IaIWk v r r Amumm Blom FEATURES LMA s aaWmw niers v v Rlyd ep lrarWm MM v TM OM. deck ako Pans v r Glade wm-ww alai r v r v Duck. type uM+M; to bola repwW. Ouowwm. ho wow DOCK COVERS Pbsaa won NO slab ta?aea I b m . Hen cloaks W alar Ma ma0'tng Pblemn ke West waabdaloGl a nlpwar Cams winmo ipni W lime and WT ARMS deme a ataor adWadww hyaaulb wrp0 bwelw Ormoe deck solloan. t#Eaff 200m.101W) 255@a.(12gkit) 3C01a.(1WW) 340 op 1161 W) COUNTERSALANCS Mocha 3071»072" MOI. Yodel" 3GlSSaam airy: Yodels 30323D0}2s tarry: Yodels 30>�134 any. WEIGHT' m m. is kg) a ma es m. (25 kg) a nes oo be. ell Ygl eve ataa0r 70 b t77 kW a raw mrar murtawga mesad meow "MOM reamed wq0 maarad. w000 morwf CIRTIFJCATION Cwl lo roam ala AlrWlfin NabW SmwaN Mamas's IA7Ci0 apaCOmbare. 071,41000 wo ap0ao0H Fadry w1p Stam lags a based 0Wa0n 'Crsowsarw aro kik wser.aa+a moaxed r O+tO.eaa is ides 1 'Darla nick ml..t wn ww1 ideas W weep 3013 kali 3d>7e w 041 D w.r.Na SCH"BER & SONS P0. BOX In 137M WUN STREET WOERS. MN 55774 March 27. 1996 Roger Madc cuy of Moatiallo 230 E Broadway P.O. Box 1147 Monticello, MN 33362 Enclosed plmse Sad some very specifie uhnna= an the John Dene F923 and F935 ftom mowers_ I am proposing both of than machines beomse they are identical other than the items on page 210.7 drat state that the F935 has a (2) 5.3 gal Gael tants, where the F925 has but woe, and the F933 has a weight aw kr control valve far limited slip an_ nuns and a cruise control where the F925 don not. The aft syedficatiom are enclosed the get into the details of both machine. t The pricing of the t%vo units aro as follows: John Deere F925 From mower with all standard options Usted, and 23 X 10.30-12 drive Ores, 72" side discharge mower. and 4 post BOPS: $10747.66 JohnF935 F mower with all sundard options UshA and 23 X 10.50- 12 drive tires. 72* side dlselwge 4 post BOPS: (11287.20 If there aro any f mother qucg= please call. 1 %MW be glad to go lhroagh soy with you. 7bank You. Sincerely, Mika rttaelk Scharber R Son<� SPECIFICATIONS FOR 2WD COMMERCUL FRONT MOWER 22 H.P. Vanmar 516 ea in. liquid cooed diad engine High enerp 91- Plots Hea" deny drelnner Engine ou UUer 12 Volt deetrie start 40 Amp automotive altcroator 11 Gallon Ord capacity Two pedal hydroantie foot control DUferendal dodo Cruise control Hydrostatic front wbed drive Hydrostatic power steam¢ 23-10.30-12 turf drhe ttra 1&&S" ribbed steering dra Transminbn oU coder Steering asstrt broker Marten brake Dual hydraulic tmpement UR cylinders 24pod Hydraulic Control Hoormeter Storage compartment Electric P.T.O. Implement drive P.T.O. shaft drive Operator presence system Fod page Low oU pressure warning, light and born cm Iran rear hamper with studs for add' e¢ rear wdgbt Wdgbt transfer valve PrMe sslmd seat Two pat Roll -Gard ROPE sad seri bolt Tod hos Optional Equipment: 72" Side discharge mover. 0.156 constructlon, with goo p wheeb, and and4calp rollers, blades to be .712 thick 60" Side discharge mower. 0.176 construction, with gangs wbeds, and and scrip rdlera, blade to be .712 thick 60" Rear discharge mower. 0.176 eomduetldn. wUb pop wbeds, and and scalp rollers, blades to be .712 thick Q 8R r" ALF COMMERCIAL FRONT MO HERS •Pi`s � � t :a��'',� _ ♦ � .. w :yam :W � 1 _ �,M7i::.-.._.. .. .. �•'r�r.::y-VK!7R^:itin�+••%ia`liArGtV _ .. .+ + ,. 1J4�. IL T,ake An Entire Committee C, ,9 1 TM 78LSah nardbchSW mous, (oft") hM srept-sAftsaft �; dM1pt kw v 4. It Nb the "23. F933.tt0 F93A I •Yi The 8oanch moasl nM , uMqus DaffRrt( • F^ � �' i • � epetem hn wperh —\� . ■\ `✓ • `►-� � CdPPInp Qlsperaal. \ •� '�. It Nb all F900 . -o•. � � 1 ,.t.• _ S Serbs all - .. F114&a TM 3Mneb hao bta ft M ell hTdmdks0y an5w 10 dsVtn '� • : '-� ISN Cr ropn. Adjustabh skW Shows. 4 rSyoetaWt Cuttbl/ awe. Rb F900 butts and F1143. s whM .6 to Straus. be reaq choose Me WM•® Rat 4&kch snow Qao.er at daft. Or Me _ bt/eapacfq 47•k 24taa Sno.bw. (bsk.) MR bulla wKw up to 19 bwt. _ • y Sfro. ff o Rb F700 ' • 14a MEW" Sots . Sno.bbwer --® caawtlon STabm � NabfSa bwadlfprt kit sots ktatarM (a"" an F700 Saba) pasfdwa Nb F"O Swing and &MMMd W&Wt)' ~ darh. Fuad K to bushet CaptCNy. P� VaMW.pWd Prerhtd. FIB ap hoot moven. tr 1 Tde7eMrsmufchky aftanM mwR mtMeMw DMS Ssd k)awa. kWhxW b4WM defbotm ramp end dbehtrgo ckw we. Rb an leant mores. IN ■ /Mt opM tM door has oo&MW'S SSR to dwrp Clygk(p No I"M. OW 94LMa Cstn " wa.0 aanamEry aptfonal. nb F700 Sattt. 3•hA MOW. Ns -y° ft Y bto.ec Rb FM strips No F314B wtM 304no dWk. i RMW 80•.4h h a QUMY eta. Comes dMw stalls VMS fro, Cub R ON all dbpaaM It wuMIJ, C-OWM Ma a hftft aOOMmM from 11/2 b a MWIP" *Mt Onaaabb SWMW". aCCMSIdS ban O. No of Of dirk make Savice .wk mors uk* to ` aeo F11SD. V r i� �S C15-210.6 F900 Series Front Mowers MOWER DECKS SPECIFICATIONS (Specifications and design subject to change without norice) A !� mho Front Mower CompatibOlty: F911 .................. Standard Optional Optional Not available F925 .................. Standard Optional Optional Optional F932 .................. Optional Standard Optional Optional F935 .............:.... Optional Standard Optional Optional Cutting Width ............. 60-in.(1524 mm) 72.8-in.0840 mm) 60 -in. (1524 mm) 76 -in. (1930 mm) Overall Width ............. 72.5-in.(1842mm) 85-in.(2159min) 65.2-in.0650 man) 783-in.(1994am) Blades: Number ............... 3 3 3 3 Blade material .......... Heat treated, high alloy steel Blade length ............ 20.5 in. (520 mm) C 15 -in. (635 mm) 203 -in. (520 mm) 25.93 -in. (684 mm) Blade width ............ 2.5 -in. (633 mm) 2.5 -in. (63.5 mm) 23 -in. (63.5 mm) 2.5 -in. (63.5 mm) Blade thickness.......... 0312 -in. (7.92 mm) 0.312 -in. (7.92 mm) 0.312 -in. (7.92 mm) 0.204 -in. (5.18 mm) Blade drive ............. Double angle belt Double angle belt HB section belt Friction disk (hat section) (hex section) Mower drive ........... Gearbox, spiral gears Gearbox. spiral gears Cost iron gearbox Cast iron gearbox (beveledgears) (beveled gears) Spindles ............... 1 -in. (25.4 mm) [-in. (25.4 mm) [-in. (25.4 mm) I -in. (25.4 mm) Bearings ............... Greastable (through Greaswble (through Greaseable (through Tapered roller, spindles) spindles) spindles) greaseable Blade 77p Speed (feet per minute) Minimum (3450 engine rpm) 14.693 14,713 14,700 14,414 Maximum (3600 engine rpm) ... 15,332 15.352 15.300 15.573 Coster wheels:............. Size .................. I Ix4.00.5 in., 4 PR (279 x 102 mm) Type .................. Pneumatic Front Anti -Scalp Roger ..... 9.75 x 4 in. Sul. 9.75 x 4 in. Std. 9.75 x 4 in. Optional 9.73 x 4 in. Std. Two Rear Anti Seatp Rollers . 9.75 x 4 inch 9.75 x 4 inch N.A. N.A. Cutting bright ............. 1.5 to 4.5 in. 1.5 in 4.5 in. I to 6 in. 1 to 5.1/2 in. (38 to 114 mm) 138 to 114 mm) (25 to 152 mm) (25 to 140 mm) Deck offset ................ 14.4 in. (366 mm) 18 in. (457 mm) 14.3 in. (364 mm) 18 art. (457 inn) Uncut Circle of Gran (withom using brake) ..... 34 in. (864 mm) 30 in. (762 mm) 41 in. (1041 mm) 14 in. (356 mm) Deck 1111 height Front ................. 14 to 16 in. 14 to 16 in. 8.4 to 10.4 in. 12.0 in. (305 mm) (355 x406 mm) (355 to406 mm) (213 to 266 mm) Rear .................. 6.5 to 8.5 in. 6.5 to 8.5 in. 5 to 7 in. 4.75 in. (121 mm) (165 to 216 mm) (165 to 216 mm) (127 to 178 mm) Discharge ................. Hinged, right Hinged, right Rear Rear Deck construction .......... One kce stamped steel Deck thickness ............ 0.134 in. (3.40 mm) 0.156 in. (3.96 mm) 0.134 in. (3.40 mm) 0.120 in. (3.0 min) Weight, opprox............. 330 lb. (160 kg) 440 lb. (200 kg) 330 lb. (145 kg) 515 Ib. (232 kg) Acres per hour* ........... 23 at 5 mph 3 at 5 mph 23 at 5 mph 3.8 at 5 mph (4.0 at 8.1 km/h) (4.8 at 8.1 km/h) (4.0 as 8.1 km/h) (6.1 at 8.1 km1h) • 77re acres per hour is an estimated figura The results were figured allowing for a 10 percent time fav for mower width over - lop, 5 percent time foss for turns, trimming, etc and mowing a smooth area. it J� UP a.c tseretau,oJL i8u a s� Mountains Into Mow Hills *:_ 0 Full • f92.4 F!47- i 1. * =140 g05 22 -hp dutrl PN•4p ra J1.4p daw I v 1 I 'Sboc� aU4 rp1n 1 J-Dw Vf)^ ad -,,p v B f you've got the wrong equipment, even mow- ing the flats can be an uphill battle. That s why ■ re.I(.raWdu+m FM» rerol more and more cutters are climbing up on the F1145. flew" Vtwb duip AV With its new 28 -hp high-torque diesel• this machine is 1110MCo°PIN& RM VM how P foray undisputed king of the hills. .0a1.,,a1 Ando With the F1145• you can set the 4 -wheel drive "full &i°°iip°'n" d' o0 @Lr b time" for continuous mowing. Or you can let it engage and disengage automatically, according to changes in out""(bona"P=W- ' met60' terrain and conditions. V= J ' PS d me . What makes the F1145 so durable? •'L .s First, tractor -tough componentry. With the F1145s transmission, differential, 2 -speed axle, and planetary final drives lifted straight from our best-selling 855 P' Compact Utility Tractor. And individual wet -disk brakes that allow constant sidehill feathering with almost no r� wear or adjustment. There's also power steering and a 22 -inch turning o radius. Plus an exlusive hydraulic 170 clutch with modulated engagement that reduces parts wear. T w"• , Read more about the F1145 and o 2 -wheel -drive 0®Series n pages 6 through 9. Then see your dear an on-site demonstration. *:_ 0 Full • f92.4 F!47- i 1. * =140 g05 22 -hp dutrl PN•4p ra J1.4p daw I v 1 I 'Sboc� aU4 rp1n 1 J-Dw Vf)^ ad -,,p v B C A T I O N S Feu -SEM FROW mous 7 Erglm Nll F92S FM FM fill Tyro Fsmb gn ya Need vsms pu Trrra no !V=t" ndsma.ro .. .. 22(Is 1w). .. .. 22(16k" 290akw) .. .af,swt I3(29e hon No CO CAMm . 2 ... - 3 . 3 traumna*." H=m ..... HOMM wamral WILmaL . .7a= Same7Cwl.... .. .. . I .... Bao .299n its mW ... . 2.BIm V2 raa) Ielm(a. W) 231 in (72 rtan) 3070 VO-) Stmu 25sm(Sammp .... 2.84 E72 ma) .. 254. (72—) .254-M—) 330.IM m6 D=WAme'u 37)m.n(BITmn .. ... .. S36 m a fm an) .5360 a 16/9m17 S35ma(679 mm) 578Ms(1113cn1 SWWV 4m 12+6e .. .... 12.0 . 12-4a12-40 '2-,V LUWM,jn Fmulia IQmm6 .. ... FOrae16 MtSRN 6 Finakm O>es"Mm Fala4et Oremomt 'vto4m]. a'dVml .ft IN blow mrAO n1. ead .tj Ib.6La MA ft. UM +Ad ft. a cowm L41 ... ...... ... L -OV ..... . Lasa... Lbum . :aN An had ZrA NmIF416F7. dl .. Ka"44. aY. M"44 ary. 'ebY•61N. ft Iaa2Carei WCFLrude Dtea6v RDer 07 awim Dow dw'm amC1 Lm FM LT1 :'Ma =0 mm W Lad FW ea., m p:a= .. F.0 ft. ray F m M. 1e0aauy FAL Ca ImLxc!n =_I rye EIST11ca eR>' Cum %T" A1edoL WIV AIMnM4Fro +WI AutOnmNlFpl :Wwmm qym 29rrtm&allllea 4011M IYaym *NM&VNV q.arla FaRltd .1 -am an= On�IWa Tlae mpm V 57 H V tiro V 1Fro thcr= V IFro -r C'C>Z.0 V tme •!a tI12hQma L7 a01 ry-IC1Ca1a h$ I h'91-0r1DLt Lir wm r4't=I Ltv •. ^.1141-121 Lala TrlW C 4 �0121 Fonar) 0-196rrmpn 0",ron ±-OerRn 0.706mo6 :I �'r 177 bmr1•a41 ill"ut) 1,7:^,•01 117 k" :d I'3 lel aatWn •dac7 0-53m o-sl.n :-53To M3m :-53 m, (61 UM4+� 1e5r'*1 cesv 1 53.r-,1 msknA -:2 -,retvr . Olkrt ' 1 CC+ SW= SI3rs1 5 V= 6hr= i i l Truer Lt :, w m:! r Ra&m Uro Raarn qm FLt.rTrl ryW 04= 10 'u Ca "De FM Tr° De= xae EYcr,maa Eera=cv Eka,cmzm sax 2v :1•A SRA Ngo C_l sr=✓aa w:m $113a.,1a=* 9aI e. tvs :-dl L'u" Mmn 1r,aa TIDI ()hall, IICa1CM Q!{{an tl'RJ[M �'Jn �4M 6naa, arnre.e .:el SL Sal 7e II71mm1 7 m Iltlmm) 7 , 071"1 Lw flilemr Los.: F1de W.4 Meet FrmaaMMmb Plam.MW FTIad ooa3 : ^a4 Ok7I and" TpI FNM. MOM= POW 7aosrx. F:- mc== Mel N=== +-+e %== IW bIYmLyrylCai Iilab2Hhlm *4KI Wlbdaa IW to Tom ko*'a '131la w—*40 OW, W, "MOM C.002.0161r lgaliCJ41( 2-L1e�MmOl$x ;7{muOt32%M NVCUC 2IT"MSW= : aI..7^ bq m1GW t= cm :1 mlaa =C= ';a •. c. W.:o 7—:1 L3Y.+aa &-v= Sam= Er'mc-1 Taus ansu 31 USO (19u..m Lm 36uS 0 UILIW.rLim 31 usaf29IJ-;W—, :I US0(390-92=1 F.mLai xcr ssusaefalu 5 UI"1meu lusyllleu ouswlaeu ous¢y1a6u 6dOr A:��C:2 AM (P(a Iu 46U3a FLU /5us0 RIL) 16Usa IaaU +e USC(Am 1�'=L�'l l':.T.a lLbalTia �Cn SJI It. D CIT/ OF MONTICELLO MONTHLY BUILDING DEPARTMENT REPORT MONTH OF APRIL 1995 PERU" a USES 'T!" -Sema MomnLast Yew T1es Yeo: PE,f1►Jf TS E§ ED MogIJ,And Lal Your To Oa» To Den RESIDENTIAL • Number 25 22 47 54 vakmdw $680.400.00 SM.S0040 $1,596300.00 $1.879.700.00 Fees $7.704.47 $075.70 $11.08795 $20.985.46 SurUnrm $277.20 $295.90 $7%15 $938.07 COMMERCIAL Number 5 7 13 12 veAsmon 9776200.00 $196.300.00 $487.30DAD $M=JDD Fen $6.076.02 $2,44520 84,837.37 67,285.02 Surdnrpn 9768.10 $107.86 $24265 $495.95 INDUSTRIAL Number 0 3 6 1 Velu9tlbn $040 $1.038,600.00 $1.07490040 $675.000.00 Fees $0.00 $6.732.51 67,30748 97,736.43 SwTt- a $040 S518M $537.45 Llai o PLUMSM N fltw 9 12 27 27 Fna 5494.00 9710.00 8679.00 $1.33740 SurUnrpes 8450 $840 $13.50 $13.80 MECNAWAL Number 9 NO w 26 Fen $402.00 $1,063.00 Sunlupe $4.50 $1340 Dow OTHERS Nxnber 0 2 3 2 Valus"an i0A0 $040 $040 Fen SurrSl w $040 $0.00 62.000.00 $140 930.00 $1.80 $200.00 60.00 ffi6L 03 TDTAL VAl UADON 9 81.33SA0000 0 $1.83e.400A0 97.077.500.00 122 X1.393 �^^^^ I9I6L F€€9 914.676 49 913.091.42. $23 722.1 a 974.74890 TOTAL SUNiCHAROES. $674.30 SAM 81353.25, III.ON92 CURRENT MONM FEES I eFRM1T Ne1jURE P.MI'!:'' Big" V"qp Tea Yep I"Ylp SWO Famll7 6 SILM37 5240.76 N8. AW.00 20 2D Duplex 0 D Cone lordal 1 $1,921.49 $125.00 $250.00040 2 0 wdwg l 0 1 0 PAS, Gwpn 0 0 S" 0 0 Putoc euw 1 92.694,12 8191.00 63631800.00 1 0 ALTERATIONIREPAIR Dmeemrpe 14 6709.10 1279E 669.400.00 20 24 Commercial 3 61.459,47 $71.20 6142.&WjW 9 13 Irx3Mb4I 0 e PLUMBING A9 T7pn 9 6494.00 14AD 67 27 MECHAMCIIL 0 A9 rMas 9 $40200 6430 Its M ACCESSORY STRUCTURES swft p POole 0 0 DoCko 6 67540 $2.50 17,600.00 5 1 MOVING PEAWT 9 0 TEMPORARY PERWT 0 0 DFMQP M %1 ?d 49 9674.30 91.3]6.010040 1n 96