Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
City Council Agenda Packet 05-28-1996
AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL "Tuesday. May 28,1988 - 7 p.m. Mayor: Brad Fyle Council Members: Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Tom Perrault 1. Call to order. 2. Approval of minutes of the special Board of Review meeting held May 8, the special meetings held at 5:30 and 6 p.m. on May 13, and the regular meeting held May 13, 1996. 3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda. 4. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints. A. Pathway Grand Opening Announcement. 5. Consent agenda. A. Consideration of a resolution authorizing the issuance of G.O. improvement bonds and refunding bonds. B. Consideration of liquor store Night/Weekend Supervisor appointment. C. Consideration of authorizing advertisement for bids for brick repair and sealing --city hall. Consideration of authorizing advertisement for bids for overlaying commuter parking lot and expansion of public works building parking lot. E. Consideration of a resolution accepting plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids --Briar Oakes Estate 2nd Addition and River Street sanitary sewer reconstruction; and consideration of adopting a resolution stating intent to reimburse the City for Briar Oakes Estate 2nd Addition project costs. F. Consideration of adopting development and disbursement agreements and approving final plat--Kloin Fauns 2nd Addition. 6. Consideration of review and aceeptaneo of City Assessor property reviews and contract renewal for 1988-1997 assessment year. Agenda Monticello City Council May 28, 1996 Page 2 7. Consideration of adopting development agreement--Nellberg East Mobile Home Park. 8. Consideration to adopt a resolution approving the Contract for Private Redevelopment among the HRA, the City, end Cedrus Creek Craftsman, Inc. 9. Consideration of adopting a revised comprehensive plan. 10. Consideration of advertisement for bids for repainting of old water tower. 11. Consideration of approving change order #1 for extension of water main on the Dundas Road project --Project 96-01C. 12. Consideration of entering into an agreement with MN/DOT allowing the City Engineer to prepare plans and specifications, conduct inspection and construction management activities of improvements proposed for Highway 25 south of I.94. 13. Consideration of approving bills for the month of May. 14. Adjournment. • 0 Meeting is Tuesday due to Memorial Day holiday. MINUTES SPECIAL JOINT MEETING MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL AND KRA Monday, May 13, 1996 - 5:30 p.m. Council Members Present: Brad Fyle, Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Tom Perrault Council Members Absent: None HRA Members Present: Al Larson, Roger Carlson, Bradley Barger HRA Members Absent: Tom St. Hilaire A special joint meeting was held with the City Council and Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the purpose of considering approval for the overall concept plans for the redevelopment project known as Prairie West. The project area is divided into four additions: lot Addition, which is the original Prairie West subdivision; 2nd Addition, which is the proposed TIF district; 3rd Addition, which is a parcel currently owned by the City; and 4th Addition, 1400 West Broadway. Economic Development Director 011ie Koropchak reported that on May 1, 1996, the HRA approved entering into a preliminary agreement with the developer, Cedrus Creek Craftsman, Inc. (John Komarek), which authorizes Publicorp, Inc., to begin preparation for establishment of the TIF district and Kennedy & Graven to begin preparation of the private redevelopment contract. Koropchak noted that the overall goals of this redevelopment project are to remove blight, increase property values, and create public green space. Mark Ruff of Publicorp, Inc., explained that the project would include 29 housing units. The lot Addition would be funded with private dollars, and the 2nd Addition would be the proposed TIF District No. 1.20, which would require HRA assistance in the amount of $130,000 plus the City property in order for the developer to receive a total sales return of 6.6'%. Typical development returns are 9.5%. Without HRA assistance and the City property, the return would be only 2.1'%; therefore, the proposed TIF district satisfies the `but for" test. Ruff went on to explain that the 3rd Addition is the parcel currently owned by the City, on which approximately $36,000 was spent to clean up the property. He noted that a city can avoid a HACA loss if it commits to a local contribution of at least 6'% of the expected tax increment. It was proposed that the City gift $20,000 of the value of the property to Cho developer and receive a payment of $16,000, thereby avoiding the HACA penalty, receiving some compensation, and receiving tax revenues from the 19 units of housing outside of the TIF district. Page I `-� Special Council Minutes - 6/13/96 Joint Meeting with HRA The 4th Addition property located at 1400 West Broadway would be purchased by the HRA with the intent of deeding the property to the City to use as green space. The amount of the purchase price, including estimated relocation costs and attorney, relocation consultant, and appraisal fees is $146,000. Council discussed the amount the City has invested in the parcel being proposed for the 3rd Addition and noted their concern with making a local contribution of $20,000 in addition to the TIF district and purchases that would be made by the HRA. Staff also discussed with Council the $11,000 in taxes is owed to the County for this parcel and the agreement with the County that the City would market the property for sale. City Administrator Wotfsteller advised that any agreement regarding the use of this parcel for the proposed Prairie West development should be presented to the County Board. Councilmember Perrault suggested that the 4th Addition proposed for green space should be developed if possible rather than adding to the park inventory. The developer noted that there is very little high ground in this area and that most of it is undevelopable. Al Larson noted that the proposed development is supported by the HRA because of the benefits to the tax base and the local area created by combining the area parcels into a single development project. In addition, a blighted property will be eliminated and replaced with a park on the pathway. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON TO APPROVE THE OVERALL CONCEPT PLAN FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT KNOWN AS PRAIRIE WEST, ESTABLISH TIF DISTRICT NO. 1.20 AS A REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, COMMIT LOCAL CONTRIBUTION OF $20,000 FOR THE CITY -OWNED PARCEL, AND ACCEPT THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1400 WEST BROADWAY FOR USE AS GREEN SPACE. Motion died for lack of a second. A MOTION WAS THEN MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON TO APPROVE THE OVERALL CONCEPT PLAN FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT KNOWN AS PRAIRIE WEST, ESTABLISH TIF DISTRICT NO. 1-20 AS A REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, AND ACCEPT THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1400 WEST BROADWAY FOR USE AS GREEN SPACE. THE CITY MUST RECOVER ITS OUT-OF-POCKET COST FOR THE CITY -OWNED PARCEL PROPOSED FOR THE 3RD ADDITION OF THE PROJECT, AND THE PROPOSAL MUST BE PRESENTED TO THE COUNTY HOARD. MOTION ALSO INCLUDES ADOPTING A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC H FARING ON ESTABLISHMENT OF TIF DISTRICT NO, 1-20 FOR JUNE 24, 1996. Page 2 :-)_ Special Council Minutes - 5/13/98 Joint Meeting with HRA COUNCILMEMBER PERRAULT THEN AMENDED THE MOTION TO ADD THAT THE AREAS THAT ARE DEVELOPABLE ON THE 4TH ADDITION PARCEL ARE TO BE DEVELOPED RATHER THAN USED FOR ADDITIONAL PARK AREA. Voting in favor of the motion: Brian Stumpf, Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Tom Perrault. Opposed: Brad Fyle. Fyle noted that if the City is reimbursed the cost for the City -owned parcel, the City will suffer HACA loss due to the proposed TIF district. Motion carried. SEE RESOLUTION 96.20. Mark Ruff noted that the HRA would not recommend that the City lose HACA aid and would meet with the attorney to ensure no loss of HACA to the City. There being no further business, the special joint meeting of the Council and HRA was adjourned. Karen Doty Office Manager Pop 3 �02 D/ EVK S SPECIAL WORKSHOP - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, May 13, 1888 - 6 p.m Members Present: Brad Fyle, Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Tom Perrault Members Absent: None A special workshop meeting of the City Council was held for the purpose of reviewing the Highway 25/Chelsea Road Corridor Study in more detail. City Engineer Bret Weiss explained that the Monticello Transportation Plan completed in June 1994 identified the Highway 25 corridor in general as an area of concern due to the congestion, close proximity to the I-94 ramp, and the number of accidents. In addition, it was noted that the amount of traffic entering and exiting Kjellbergs Mobile Home Park, the development of School Boulevard, and commercial development in the area will add to the congestion problems. Weiss went on to report that a feasibility study for Highway 25 improvements was completed in March 1996, which identified three options for improvements. Option #1 proposed the extension of Chelsea Road in a northerly alignment; however, this option was eliminated from the study due to the number of serious impacts to properties in its path or adjacent to it. Option 02 proposed a more straight extension of Chelsea Road, while Option #3 proposed a more southerly alignment with Sandberg Road. Either option would involve right-of-way purchase and building purchase and relocation. The conclusion of the feasibility study was to pursue Options #2 and #3 and seek public input. Chuck Rickert of WSB reviewed the time line for the project, which included items such as information mailings, public information meetings, and business owner meetings. Once the public meetings are held and Council selects an option, the project would be sent to MN/DOT for their approval. It was the consensus of Council to allow the process to continue and to move forward according to the City Engineer's time line recommendation. There being no further business, the special workshop meeting was adjourned. Karen Doty Office Manager KINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCEL Monday. May 13. LOW - 7 p.m. Members Present: Brad Fyle, Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Tom Perrault Members Absent: None ApRroval of minutes of the regular mpptinr held Ap it 2222, 1996, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY TOM PERRAULT TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEE71 NG HELD APRIL 22, 1998. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of adding items to the ngendn A. Consideration of approving the isa"nce of a gambling licenAg by 1+e Monticello CommLn_ity Partners (MCP) --button raffle. City Administrator Rick Wolfateller reported that the MCP is currently in the process of promoting the 'Catch the Wave' theme as part of the downtown revitalization program and is ordering 10,000 numbered buttons to be sold at $6 each for potential awards and prizes. In order to conduct what the State considers a gambling operation, the MCP needs to apply for an exemption from the gambling license requirements that a non-profit organization is allowed to conduct, provided the activity has less than $60,000 in prizes during a calendar year. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE STATE TO ISSUE A GAMBLING LICENSE TO THE MCP AND WAIVE THE 30 -DAY REQUIREMENT. Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 96.19. , , , , 1 -417 ,I • 7.4-V , %,., i City Engineer Bret Weiss reported that a total of six bids were received at 10 a.m., May 10, for Project 96-01C, Dundas Road improvements. The engineer's estimate for the project was $116,309. Annandale Contracting submitted the lowest bid in the amount of $101,790.61. Weiss recommended awarding the contract to Annandale Contracting, Inc. Council Minutes - 6/13/96 A MOTION WAS MADE BY TOM PERRAULT AND SECONDED BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON TO AWARD THE CONTRACT FOR PROJECT 96- 0IC, DUNDAS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, TO ANNANDALE CONTRACTING, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $101,790.51. Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTION 96-18. Citie g co m n s/p i .io s requests- and compl in s. None. Consent agenda. Mayor Fyle requested that item A be removed from the consent agenda. Councilmember Brian Stumpf requested that item D be removed from the consent agenda for discussion. A. Consideration of n ordinance amendment modify, excavation permit. 'ns +rance Muirements under City Ordinance 740P L Chapter 2. Section 11. - Removed from consent agenda for discussion. B. Consideration of nuho 'zing+ City Fniginygr to pSnam nlnna and RpgZifirntinna for Klein Farms P ags II, Recommendadon: Authorize the City Engineer to prepare plans and specifications for Klein Farms Phase 11. C. Con_gideration of allowing as simnl s ,hdiviainn. Leri ion's Lots 4 and band fi. and 41; Original Plat_ Applicant -Vie R lmnn, Recommendation: Approve the simple subdivision of Lots 4 and 6, Block 46, Original Plat. D,Consideration of aono'ntm� e, nt ofIiosephMo hak to thn position of Chip 11ril ins O rinl - Removed from consent agenda for discussion. E. Cn aid rn ion of ado ins a regolutinn accepting thn fe sa ihility study and n utho 'ring nrepnraticn of p1 ns amend gpPdfinntio a for River 9trept trunk ArlailM sewer reconstruction, Recommendation: Adopt a resolution accepting the feasibility study and authorizing the City Engineer to prepare plans and specifications for reconstruction of the River Street trunk sanitary sower; and adopt a resolution stating intent to reimburse the City for project costs. SEE RESOLUTIONS 96-16 and 96.17. Page 2 r Council Minutes - 6/13/96 Consideration of allowing residential property to ny onp smell storage shed (less thgn 120 sa ft) in addition togn a 0ee Ary s Z+c* +ra Applicant. Ron hUduLelis. Recommendation: Allow a single storage shed in addition to an accessory structure if the size of the shed is less than 120 sq R and call for a public hearing on a zoning ordinance amendment clarifying this interpretation. A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON TO APPROVE ITEMS B, C, E, AND F ON THE CONSENT AGENDA AS RECOMMENDED. Motion carried unanimously. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS DISCUSSED: .:,.. . a �T : i r. Public Works Director John Simola reported that the insurance requirements for excavation contractors had not been updated since the 1970'x, which required public liability insurance of $60,000 per any one person and $100,000 per any one accident, and property damage of not less than $26,000. It was proposed that the ordinance be amended to require public liability of not lees than $1,000,000 for each occurrence and $1,000,000 for general aggregate, and worker's compensation insurance, with employer's liability limit of at least $100,000. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRAD FYLE AND SECONDED BY TOM PERRAULT TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT INCREASING INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR EXCAVATION CONTRACTORS AS PROPOSED EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1998. Motion carried unanimously. SEE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 278. D. Vnwaidpratinn of npno'ntmn� nt of Jnse^r Morchnk to t_in_pasition of Chief Ruilding Ullicinl, Assistant Administrator Jett O'Neill reported that after conducting interviews, it was recommended by the personnel subcommittee, made up of Brad Fyle, Brian Stumpf, John Simoln, Tom Bose, and Jeff O'Neill, that the position of Chief Building Official be offered to Joseph Merchak. O'Noill noted that because of his experienco, the proposed offer made to Merchak included a starting salary of $35,810, which is the middle point in the salary range for the position. It was also Page 3 C-� Council Minutes - 5/13/96 proposed that Merchak be granted two weeks of paid vacation in the first year along with one week unpaid leave, and $50 per month in addition to the normal $.28 per mile for the use of his private vehicle. Council members discussed their concern with veering from the personnel policy regarding vacation time, which allows one week paid vacation during the first year of employment. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRAD FYLE AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO OFFER THE POSITION OF CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL TO JOSEPH MERCHAK WITH A STARTING SALARY OF $35,810, AN ADDITIONAL $50 PER MONTH IN ADDITION TO $.28 PER MILE, ONE WEEK OF PAID VACATION IN THE FIRST YEAR, AND ONE WEEK UNPAID VACATION IF DESIRED. Voting in favor. Brad Fyle, Brian Stumpf, Shirley Anderson, Tom Perrault. Opposed: Clint Herbst. It was Herbst's view that the current Building Inspector did not receive the opportunity for the new position as previously discussed. Motion passed. Puhli�ayng-- .a aid raLon of area eliminate lot line between Leta 3 and 4 Mike ZieFtkn. Mayor Fyle opened the public hearing. Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that a conditional use permit was awarded to Mike Zieska at the last Council meeting which would allow him to operate an auto body repair shop in a B-3 zone. In addition, it was required that the lot line between Lots 3 and 4 be eliminated so that the second parcel used for parking could not be sold without City approval. There being no comment from the public, the public hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY TOM PERRAULT TO APPROVE THE REQUEST TO VACATE THE UTILITY EASEMENT AND ELIMINATE THE LOT LINE BETWEEN LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK 3, PLAZA PARTNERS. Motion is contingent on acquisition and development of the atrected lots as proposed by Mike Zieska. Motion carried unanimously. Page 4 C.2 .� Council Minutes - 5/13/96 Consideration of an ordinance amen rnant Pgtablffighinp, gn nill ib acili v (auto mnintenance fa 'li i sl ag a conditional aiAp 'n thp PZM v ne Applicant" Investors Toee hp . Co aidera .ion of n ing n oonditional unp permit which wo ,ld n1low operation of n nil/lube faeility fa + A Aln}PnAnf a faeili ictal in a PZM zonp. Appliicant. Investors Toee�er. Co lidera .ion ofan ordingnce amen rent ea ah is ing minor auto ren a conditional sige in the PZM -on Applicant Investors Tope her. Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that Investors Together was requesting an ordinance amendment establishing an oil/lube facility as a conditional use in the PZM zone, a conditional use permit allowing operation of an oil/lube facility in a PZM zone, as well as an ordinance amendment establishing minor auto repair as a conditional use in the PZM zone. O'Neill noted that a few years ago the Planning Commission approved allowing an oil/lube facility in the PZM zone; however, the request was withdrawn by the applicant and was never reviewed by the City Council. After reviewing the current request at their May 7 meeting, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinance amendment allowing auto maintenance facilities as a conditional use in the PZM zone. Planner Steve Grittman of Northwest Associated Consultants noted that because the proposed oil/lube facility would be a "while -you -wait" service, it could compatibly exist in the PZM district provided various conditions were implemented. In regard to the proposed ordinance amendment allowing minor auto repair in the PZM zone, Grittman suggested that Council rezone the property if they felt this would be an appropriate use of the site rather than pursue a PZM district amendment. Council noted their concern with amending the PZM district regulations, as any change would affect all PZM zones in the city. They were also concerned that can may eventually be left overnight at the site. Ken Schwartz noted that the current car wash at the site has a bigger impact on the site than an oil/lube facility would have, as the car wash could see approximately 250 cars on a busy day, while the oil/lube facility would have only 25-30 cars per day. It was his view that the traffic impact would be minimal. A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO DENY THE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ALLOWING AUTO MAINTENANCE FACILITIES AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN THE PZM DISTRICT. 3 Page 8 �a�, Council Minutes - 5/13/96 Motion is based on the finding that the proposed amendment and resulting use is not consistent with the spirit and intent of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance, the proposed amendment and resulting use is likely to have an adverse impact upon surrounding properties, and the proposed use is not consistent with the purpose of the PZM district. Motion carried unanimously. A MOTION WAS ALSO MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY TOM PERRAULT TO DENY THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN AUTO MAINTENANCE FACILITY IN A PZM ZONE AND DENY THE REQUEST FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ALLOWING MINOR AUTOMOBILE REPAIR IN A PZM ZONE. Motion is based on the finding that the proposed uses are not consistent with the spirit and intent of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance, and the proposed uses are likely to have an adverse impact upon surrounding properties. Motion carried unanimously. 10. nnsid ration of an ordinance ampneimpnt reducing )mrd size renuirempnta fo_ r gingric, family detached structures in nn R-2 zone _ Applicant „ Ron Ruff - 11. Congideration of meowing a gimgdp. s ,hdi 'cion. AUldimnt Ran Ruff, Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that Ron Rufr requested an ordinance amendment reducing the lot size requirements for single family structures in the R-2 zone from the minimum of 12,000 sq ft to 10,000 sq ft in order to allow subdivision of a 21,412 sq ft lot O'Neill noted that the amendment request made sense since the R-2 zone is a higher density area and the lot is located in the old part of town where the lots are the same size as the lots that would be created by Ruffs subdivision. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinance amendment and simple subdivision requests. It was their view that the City could control future use of the R-2 district. ONeill and Grittman noted that the City oould block unwanted higher density by simply refusing to establish new R-2 zones. If larger Iota are desired by the City, then the R-1 district would bo the required zoning for new development. Council discussed their concern regarding future developments which may include R-2 zoning. An ordinance amendment reducing the lot size in the R- 2 zone would not only affect the property owned by Ron Ruff, but all current and future R-2 zones in the city. O'Neill noted that the City has been using more PUD concepts recently, which give the City more control over the use of land and open space. Councilmember Herbst noted that one of the goals of the Council has been to try and increase the home values in the city, and reducing the lot size would not help to reach this goal. Page 6 �a !i Council Minutes - 5/13/96 AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY TOM PERRAULT TO DENY THE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REDUCING MINIMUM LOT SIZES FOR SINGLE FAMILY USES IN THE R•2 DISTRICT. Motion is based on the finding that 12,000 sq It is the appropriate minimum size for single family lots in an R-2 zone and adequate controls and flexibility are in place in the ordinance to accommodate the original town plat areas. Voting in favor: Clint Herbst, Tom Perrault, Shirley Anderson, Brian Stumpf. Opposed: Brad Fyle. Motion passed. No action was necessary on item q11, as without the ordinance amendment, the proposed simple subdivision would create non -conforming Iota. City Administrator Rick Wolfateller reported that at the previous Council meeting, a public hearing was held concerning an ordinance amendment allowing Sunday liquor license holders to serve liquor as early as 10 a.m. on Sundays rather than at 12 p.m. Rob Hoffman, owner of J.P.'s Annex, requested that Council reconsider his request. Hoffman spoke to Council regarding their concerns with allowing liquor sales beginning at 10 a.m. on Sundays, noting that he needed to provide service similar to the St. Cloud and Minneapolis areas in order to stay competitive. He noted that the Council could dictate that license holders with specific levels of service could servo liquor earlier than 12 p.m. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY BRAD FYLE TO CONFIRM ITS ORIGINAL DECISION TO DENY AMENDMENT TO THE LIQUOR ORDINANCE AND LEAVE IT AS IS WITH NO SALES OCCURRING BEFORE NOON ON SUNDAYS. Voting in favor: Brian Stumpf, Brad Fyle, Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst. Opposed: Tom Perrault. Motion passed. 1 1 t, 1 14t ,, t l • 11,1 1 1 1 y t ', City Administrator Rick Wolfateller reported that with the recent annexation of the Hawke Sports Bar property in conjunction with the development of the River Mill subdivision, municipal sewer and water services were installed in the River Mill project, making sanitary sower available for Hawke Bar. Wol&teller noted that Joe and Theresa Abbott, owners of Hawks Bar, recently indicated they were ready to connect to the city sower system; however, they requested Council consideration of establishing the hook-up fee based on the 1895 rate of $1,200 per unit rather than the current $1,600 Page 7 i / Council Minutes - 6/13/96 per unit. The Abbotts also requested to be allowed to pay for the hook-up fees over a number of years rather than in one lump sum since it was an existing business when annexed. Wolfsteller noted his concern with the precedent that may be set by charging the 1995 rate rather than the current rate. He also felt there nzay be some justification for allowing the hook-up fee to be paid in installments over a number of years; however, he noted that the same request may come from other existing businesses that would likely connect to the syatem in the future. Joe Abbott stated that the system was not available for him to connect last year. He explained that he asked the people working on the sewer system when hook-up would be available, and no one would give him an answer. The City Administrator noted that the Public Works Director sent a letter to the Abbotts dated November 6, 1995, explaining that sanitary sewer and water service was available and that the hook-up fee would increase to $1,500 per unit effective January 1, 1996. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY TOM PERRAULT TO ESTABLISH THE SANITARY SEWER HOOK-UP RATE FOR HAWKS SPORTS BAR AT THE CURRENT AMOUNT OF $IAGO PER UNIT AND TO ACCEPT INSTALLMENT PAYMENTS OVER FOUR YEARS WITH INTEREST CHARGED ON THE UNPAID BALANCE. Voting in favor: Shirley Anderson, Tom Perrault, Brian Stumpf. Opposed: Clint Herbst. It was Herbst's view that because the sanitary sewer system became available so late in the year that it would be appropriate to charge the 1995 rate. Abstaining: Brad Fyle, as he was contacted by the Abbottts to perform the system connection. Motion passed. 14. Conoid ration of renovidng Eastwood Knoll is ing ngn went v6d t. Fdinn Bsn1t . Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that it had been one year since the listing agreement with Edina Realty was approved for marketing the Eastwood Knoll subdivision. Lots have been selling on a fairly steady basis, and the homes being constructed are valued in excess of what was originally anticipated for the property. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO RENEW THE LISTING WITH EDINA REALTY UNDER THE SAME TERMS FOR THE SALE OF LOTS IN THE EASTWOOD KNOLL SUBDIVISION. Motion carried unanimously. Pago 8 `� Council Minutes - 5/13/96 15. Review of first quarter liquor store financial statement and consideration of repairs to pylon sign. City Administrator Wolfsteller reported that the first quarter liquor store report showed that sales were up $44,000, approximately a 14% increase, and the resulting gross profit was up $17,000 over last year. With expenses decreasing slightly by $4,000 from last year, the operating income showed a healthy gain of $21,500 to a total of $45,288 for the first quarter. Liquor Store Manager Joe Hartman requested that Council consider authorizing repairs to the pylon sign at the liquor store. A quote for replacing the sign face with a maintenance -free lexan face was received from LeRoy Signs for $6,580. A second quote was obtained from DeMars Signs, Inc., in the amount of $2,791. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO ACCEPT THE FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE FIRST QUARTER AS PRESENTED AND AUTHORIZE REPAIRS TO THE EXISTING LIQUOR STORE PYLON SIGN AT THE QUOTED PRICE OF $2,791 FROM DEMARS SIGNS. Motion carried unanimously. City Administrator Wolfateller reported that Council requested additional information on the present cleaning contracts for public buildings to help determine whether a janitorial position needed to be established. It was noted that in the past, the primary outside contract for cleaning services was for city hall, as the library has retained the janitorial services of a retired individual for a number of years. However, with the recent expansion of the office, conference room, and lunch room facilities at the public works shop, and with the relocation of the deputy registrar office, LKM Cleaning of Big Lake was hired to perform daily cleaning at the deputy registrar office and once -a -week cleaning at public works. The total current contracts amount to approximately $17,600 annually, excluding services such as carpet cleaning. Wolfsteller went on to report that after researching the possibility of creating a full-time janitorial position, based on the City's present wage system, the minimum salary would be $17,950 per year, not including benefits. This amount is very close to the amount currently spent for contract services. Page 9 Coumcil Minutes - 5/13/96 AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON TO CONTINUE WITH THE PRESENT ARRANGEMENTS FOR CLEANING SERVICE FOR THE REMAINDER OF 1995 AND OBTAIN BIDS IN OCTOBER FOR CLEANING SERVICES AT PUBLIC WORKS, DEPUTY REGISTRAR, AND CITY HALL. Motion carried unanimously. 17. Consideration of reviewing hidA sind awarding contract for mowingatp +b i huildiuEe. Public Works Director John Simola reported that bids for contract mowing for Hi -Way Liquor, the library, the fire hall, and all public nuisance mowings were received on May 7. The low bidder for the City's portion of the work was Carefree Lawn Service of Monticello. A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY TOM PERRAULT TO AWARD THE CONTRACT FOR MOWING AT PUBLIC BUILDINGS TO CAREFREE LAWN SERVICE OF MONTICELLO. Motion carried unanimously. 18. VnnaideraLon of pnnrhaaingcomputers and n primer for public wor)I. Public Works Director John Simola reported that additional research had been completed and an equipment inventory list had been distributed to Council as previously requested. Council was asked to reconsider purchasing two personal computers at a cost of $4,311 to be utilized by the Water/Sewer Collection Superintendent and the Public Works Secretary. In addition, the purchase of an inkjet color printer was requested at a price of $1,688 to allow printing of detailed graphs and drawings produced by Lhe Meter Master and CAD software packages. Simola noted that previously a laser printer was also requested; however, a used model was acquired at no charge in conjunction with the purchase of used furniture for the future treatment plant administration building. The City also acquired a color graphics plotter in the package deal, but it is outdated and Hewlett-Packard no longer provides support for this equipment. Staff noted that if the plotter is operational and supplies can be found, a lose expensive inkjet printer could be purchased for approximately $560. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY S1iIRLEY ANDERSON TO APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF TWO PENTIUM 120 MHZ COMPUTERS AT A COST OF $2,363 EACH, AND STAFF IS TO RETURN TO COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION OF AN INKJET PRINTER IN THE EVENT THE COLOR GRAPHICS PLOTTER IS NOT OPERATIONAL. The Public Works Director requested that Council consider allowing staff to purchase the inkjet printer if the plotter is not operational without returning the item to Council for discussion. Pogo 10 �.� Council Minutes - 6/13196 COUNCILMEMBER ANDERSON THEN AMENDED HER MOTION TO APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF TWO PENTIUM 120 MHZ COMPUTERS AT A COST OF $2,363 EACH, AND APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF AN INKJET PRINTER AT A PRICE OF $1,688 IF THE COLOR GRAPHICS PLOTTER OBTAINED WITH THE FURNITURE PURCHASE IS FOUND NOT TO BE OPERATIONAL. Motion was seconded by Clint Herbst. Motion carried unanimously It was the oonsensus of Council to authorize staff to dispose of the old Wang computer equipment currently in storage. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Karen Doty Office Manager Page 11 ? j Council Agenda - 5/28/96 The purpose of this item is really two -fold, with the first being related to the refinancing of some of our existing bond debt and the second being the issuance of bonds for upcoming improvement projects this summer, including Briar Oakes Estate 2nd Addition and the Dundas Road/Fallon Avenue improvement projects. Initially, Mark Ruff of Ehlers & Associates, TIF consultant for the HRA, was reviewing the outstanding bonds on TIF projects that could be refinanced as of February 1996. Mr. Ruff was reviewing this information for the HRA to make a recommendation on refinancing three bond issues to save an estimated $50,000 in future interest cost. Because of recent law changes regarding TIF financing, the HRA would have had to eliminate one of the assessment agreements pertaining to the Raindance TIF project (Maus Foods store), which could have affected future TIF revenue. As a result, it was determined that this bond was not a good candidate to be refinanced; and thus, the savings originally anticipated has diminished substantially to where it is estimated we would save about $4,500 in interest cost by refinancing two TIF bond issues. Mr. Ruff also reminded me that there were three other oxisting G.O. bonds that were callable and could be refinanced for the City to save future interest cost. In reviewing these bond issues, it now appears that although the savings are not substantial, the City could save an additional $25,000 in interest if we refinanced the existing 1986 sower interceptor bond and the 1990B G.O. improvement bond. While the cost of refinancing eats up over half of the interest savings, it probably still makes sense to refinance if we can save $25,000. It should be noted that the City has used Springsted, Inc., as its financial consultant for over 20 years. The proposal to use Ehlers & Associates as the fiscal consultant for this refinancing and new issue does not necessarily mean we are severing ties with Springsted, but it just happened that Mark Ruff took the initiative to review our outstanding bonds and make a recommendation, whereas Springsted did not bring to our attention that refinancing was an option at this time. With the potential of refinancing existing bond issues, it was an opportunity to also include a bond sale to cover the improvement projects we have planned for this summer. The Briar Oakes Estate 2nd Addition project is Council Agenda - 5/28/96 estimated to cost $442,000 and the Dundas Road/Fallon Avenue project an additional $130,000. Since these projects will be financed by the City and assessed to the developed property, we would have to sell bonds to finance these projects anyway. By combining the new issue with refinancing of our existing debt, we're able to lower our issuance cost for the bonds. Since some of the issues are different types of bonds, the proposal would be to issue three separate bonds, Series 1996A, 19968, and 1996C. The 1996A series would be a total of $1,035,000 for refinancing $380,000 in 1990B G.O. bonds and the balance for covering the new improvement projects planned this summer. The 1996B bond is proposed to refinance two tax increment bonds, the balance of the 1987A bond and the 1990A bond. The third proposed issue is the 19960 bond, which will refinance the balance of the 1986A sewer interceptor bond. If it should turn out that the interest rates change by the time the bonds are sold, we may find that it is no longer beneficial to refinance these existing bonds since the estimated interest savings is quite small at this time. If this is the case, we can always cancel the bond sale, as the only real need will be for funds to finance the new Briar Oakes Estate 2nd Addition and Dundas Road/Fallon Avenue project, which could be sold separately. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Adopt the resolutions authorizing the sale of three separate bond issues as described above. The bid date would be June 24. Adopt a resolution authorizing the sale of G.O. bonds for approximately $640,000 only to cover the new improvements scheduled for this summer. Under this alternative, the City would not be refinancing existing G.O. bonds that aro callable or the TIF bonds that are also callable due to the limited interest savings we would receive. Although we expected to save more interest cost by refinancing these issues than it may turn out to be, it still may be beneficial to refinance bond issues that are callable even if we only save $25,000 from all of the issues. Due to the fact we do need to borrow money for the Briar Oakes Estate 2nd Addition and Dundas Road projects we will be doing this summer, this helps cut down Council Agenda - 5/28/98 on the issuance cost by being able to combine more projects together. As a result, it is my recommendation that since Ehlers & Associates did take the time to put together this proposal, the resolutions should be adopted under option #1 above. If it turns out that the savings are not beneficial after the bids are received, we can cancel the sale at that time. Bond summary data from Ehlers & Associates; Resolutions for adoption. MAY 22 196 05:43PM EFL.ERS & ASSOCIATES P.2/29 PRE -SALE REPORT $1,035,000* GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES MA, S4SS,000* GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 19%B, and $595,000* GENERAL OBLIGATION SEWER INTERCEPTOR REFUNDING BONDS, SERFS 19%C MAY 22,19% sAfi- MAY 22 '% OS:43PM DA.ERS & ASSOCIATES P. 3/29 Pm-S.L R.p w • GO. &mk C.O. To!roman Agioft d C O.4wa hWtgt r Rq4ftft Bab ovRvmW ibis report describes the proposed plan for the City of Monticello to issue die $1,035.000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 1996A; the SWAM Gtweral Obligation Tex Increment RetLnAing Bonds, Series 19%B; and the $595,000 Ocneral Obligation Sewer Interceptor Refunding Bonds Series 1996C. This report has been I I by Mets and Associaw, in coatuhuion with City Staff and bond counsel This report deals with: • Purpose and compoaanu of bond issues • Strxmm. • Otluer consWerations in issuing bonds. • Msdw condhim issuing pro-& Page 1 SfiB MAY 22 '% 05:43PM EKIM 8 ASSOCIATES P.4/29 $1,035,000* G.O. BONDS, SERIFS 1996A PURPOSE PmSak Rep" • G.O. Saab The f I ,035,000* General Obligation Bonds. Series 1996A (the "Series 1996A Bonds') will be k --A pursuant to Minnaom Salutm Chapters 4I9 and 475. for the purposes of financing various improvements within the City and refinancing the 5730,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series I990B, dated July I, 1990. The proposed finance plan consists of the following sources and uses of funds: Sources Par Amount of Bonds ILMj.Qpp Total Sources Uses Deposit to Escrow Fund (for Series 1990B Bonds) S390,000.00 Con of Ciry Projects 605,600.00 Total Underwriters Discount Allowance 12,937.50 Con of Issuance 16,452.35 Capitalized Interest 15,866.25 Contingency 4.143.90 Total Uses jLQ= * The Issuers reserves the right to increase or degrease the principal amount of the Bonds on the day of sale, in increments of 55.000 for each maturity, to which may be made in any maturity. If the principal amount of the bonds is Austad. the purchase price will be adjusted proportionately. STRUCTURE The Series 1996A Bonds will be dated July 1. 1996. The fust interest payment on the Series 1996A Bonds will be due on February 1, 1997, and scmWmualy thorcaftct'on August 1 and February 1. Principal on the Series 1996A Bonds will be duo on February 1 In the years 1997 through 2007. The Series 1996A Bonds maturing In the yen 2001 through 2007 will be subject to redemption without penalty beginning on February 1, 2000. This provision auks 54.111E of the issue callable. This call [astute will allow early repayment of the bonds If the City receive slgnificam prepayments of special assessments. The Series 1996A Bends tee general obligations of to city for which It pledges Its full filth, credit and twdng powers to payments of principal and interest and are entirety payola from special asausments levied against specially benefitted properties and property taxes. Page 2 MAY 22 '96 05r44PM EH ERS 8 ASSOCIATIM P.529 AnLb Rrrwr.COL Bah JWWedinB Porton The refunding portion of the Series 1996A Bonds are expected to save the City $7,120.15 (present value of $6,488.62) in debt service cogs fiom tax years 1997 through 2001. Normally it would not be feasible to mfund these band:. However. by combining dee refinancing of the Series 1990A Tax laeremrnt Bands with the issuance of new Improvement bonds, this rcwlrs in Icss cogs of issttaace meting the rel'nding feasible. The average interest rues on the old bonds wen 6.59%. The new rates ace ocpeeted to average 5.29%. New Mona Pwflon The new money portion of the bond will fmance two City *rove ens pnTje= %41 C (Amdsu RosdTallon Avenue) and 96-02C (Briar Oakes Estate 2nd Addition). The bond issue has been Aruetured with level principal and intereg Payments over 10 years. Attachment A lige the unptwxman pmjem of ere City being Flnaneed at this time and the total cogs to be financed. Page i S01D MAY 22 196 05:44PM EFL.ER5 a PSSOCIATES P.6/29 InjakRamn-G.0 T. r�nc4aftA.6 5455,000• G.O. TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1996B The 5455,0000 General obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 19%B (the "Series 1996E Bonds') are being auftrized pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. The Series 1996B Bands ere being issued for the purpose of refinancing the $365,000 General Obligation Tax Int Bonds, Series 1987A, dated June 1, 1987 and the S560.000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds. Series 1990A, dated July 1, 1990, which will require a bond issue in the amount of $455,000. The proposed finance plan consists of the following sources and uses of funds: Souren Par Amount of Bonds S455MO Total Sources Una Deposit to Escrow Fund 5440.000 Total Underwriters Discount Allowance 5.687.50 Cost of Issuaate 7.236.65 Contingency 2,075.85 Total Una • The Issuer reserves the right to increase or decrease the principal amount of the Bonds on the day of sale. in iaerements of $5,000 for each maturity, to which maybe made in any maturity. If the principal amount of the Bonds is 4utied, the purchase price will be Ousted proportionately. STRUCTURE The Strias 19%B Bonds will be dated July 1, 19%. The first inset payment on the Series 1996E Bonds will be due on February 1. 1997, and semiannually thereafter on August I ntd February I. Principal on the Series 1996E Bonds will be duc on February 1 in the years 1997 through 2000. There will be no rcdemptioo feature on the Series 19%B Bonds due to the short term of the Bonds. The Series 19%B Bonds are expected to save the City approximately $4,542.10 (present value of $4,152.62) in debt service costs f om tax years 1997 through 2000. The average interest rates on the 1987 bonds were 7.40% and the overage interest rams on the 1990 bonds were 6.50%. The now ratty ae expected to average 5.25%. Page 4 MAY 22 '% 05:44PM EFLERS & ASSOCIATES P.729 PmJmb AVLW-Ga TM &v MAOMM&Wea-6 The Scriet 19968 Bonds we gmeM obligations of the City for which the it pledges its dill faith, ered)t and taxing powers to payment of priaeipd and inmost bit the inwation of the City to pry principal and interest on the Series 19968 Bonds from pledged tax inaemem novena generated ftom Tax Increment Financing District Na S, within the Central Monticello Redevelopment Project, adopted by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in sad for the City of Monticello, and Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-1. within Development District No. I, adopted by the City of Monticello, as specified in the Tax Increment Pledge Agmementa. If tax inaemem revenues we ma iffieient to meet principal and interest on the Series 19%B Bonds, the City b required to levy ad valorem taxes without limit as to rate or amount on all taxable property in the City to makeup the deficiency. Current catUkm indicate that tax inc anent B suMci m to mea all obligations. Page S SRF MpY 22 196 05:44PM EHLERS 8 ASSOCIATES P.829 P-Sak Rte"-G.O. Sero bmup or AcA- e+ l-6 $595,000' G.O. SEWER INTERCEPTOR REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 19960 PURPOSE The $595,000• General Obligation Sewer interceptor Refunding Bonds, Series 19960 (the "Series 19960 Bonds") arc being authorized pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 115 and 475. The Series I "6C Bands arc being issued for the purpose of refinancing the $1,00,000 Clmeral Obligation Sewer Interceptor Bonds, Series 1986A, dated May 1, 1986 which will require a bond issue in the amount of $595,000. The proposed finaace plan consists of the following sources and uses of funds: Sources Par Amount of Bonds 5595.000 Total Sources Utast Deposit to Escrow Fund $575,000.00 Total Underwriters Discount Allowance 7,437.50 Coat of Issuance 9,461.00 Contingency 3.101.50 Total Uses • The issuer reserves the right to increase or decrease the principal amount of the Bonds on the day of sale, in increments of $5,000 for each maturity, to which may be made in any maturity. if the principal amount of the Bonds is adjusted, the purchase price will be adjusted proportionately. STRUCTURE The Series 1996C Bonds will be dated July I, 1996. The that interest paymenton the Series 19960 Bonds will be due on February 1, 1997, and semiannually thvaaft on August 1 and February I. Principal an the Series 19960 Bonds will be due on February I in the yeas 1997 through 2002. The Series 19960 Bonds maturing in the year 2002 will be subject to redemption without penalty beginning on February I, 2001. The Series 19%8 Bonds are expected to save the City approximately $20,924.00 (present value of $18,450.00) in debt smite costs ftom tax years 1997 through 2002. The average interest rates on the old bonds were 6.8555. The new rates are expected to average S.15% The Series 1996C Bonds are genual obligations oftlte City fbr w deb it pledges its fWl frith, credit and taxing powers to payments of principal and interest and aro entirely payable flom gmeral tax levies. Page 6 S� MRY 22 '% 05:45PM EHFRS & ASSOCIATES P.9/29 P—Sai bpon-G.O smile GO ra+/aaanor Adk,&w Sash, and G.O. farvheec�ao. RtJiwrby sw.e� OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Following is a summary of key factors in the finance plan: • We anticipate "the City will not issue,nose that f 10,000,000 in tax-exempt bonds during calendar year 19%. This will allow the issue to be du4nated as bmrk gaal#red. Bank qualifled status broadens the market and achieves lower interest taus. It is estimated bat all bond proceeds will be spent within 18 months of cbsing. • Because the City is not issuing more than 35,000,000 in tax-cx mpt bonds during calendar year 19%. the Bonds will qualify for the small issua exemption f am, arbitrage rebate. • The Bands will be in fully registered form as to both principal and immesh and will be in integral multiples of $5,000 each. The Bonds will be global book-mry, which eliminates the coos of bond printing. A mgistradpaying agent will be appointed to assist the City. • The City has an outstanding Moody's bond rating of "A", and we would recommend the City request a rating on this awe. Comparables, 1993 to 1996 with $1,785,000 issue. • On July 3, IM, new regulations of the Securities and Exchange Caaominimt on the continuing disclosure of municipal securities took effect Tho regulations apply to long-term securities with an aggregefe principal amount of 31,000,000 or mora. Since the Serie 1996A Bonds will be over 31,000,000, thcy are subject to the continuing disclosure regulations. MARKET CONDITIONS Interest rates have been rising am February, 1996 after a at* decline dom AuguM 1995. They have been n. -ming stotmd 6.00% for the put 6 to 8 weeks. This trail mwvcrs 6mn a npW Ilse in rates expaieaead during the last quarter of 1994. The graph on the fblbwiag page shows the trends In the Band Buyefs 20 -Yen G.O. Index (881) for the last 18 momhs. While interest rtes have rises dom historic lows in 1993, current ratI still mirror conditions found sevcrW yen ago. Pap 7 ,eoO4/l MAY 22 '96 05:45PM ER -ERS S ASSOCIATES P. 11/29 ho4ek Aqk"- G.O. ao"mc G.O. Tar raavraa xcim to BOros 0I60 &. hm-epw ft&% g0-6 ISSUING PROCESS Ehlers and Associates, Inc. will work with City staff and bond counsel to make am that all the requited procedures and documentation arc completed. Ehlers will prepare and print the Official Statement for distribution to the underwriters and send the appropriate materials to Moody's Investors Service. On the date of the sale, filers and Associam Inc. will accept proposab for the Bonds In our offices at which time the pr0p03a4 will be opened and tabulated. We will accept proposals submitted by mail, ukphone, and via PARI'JY. an electronic, proposal filing process. We will also offer a surety bonds servim "S re -Bid" to underwriters in lieu of putting Cap a good faith cheek in order to bid on tke bonds. All of Ire proposal optima will be included in the Tema of Proposal inehded in this Pre -Sale Repos. After the proposals we reeeive4 verified for accuracy. and tabulated, they will thea be presented to the City Council for bion of rewad the same eveni% Proceeds will be available approximately 3 to 4 weeks after the award of sale. Ekkrs and Associap. Jos. recommends the following time line for the issuance ofthe Bonds: May 28,19% City adopts resolution Calling for the sale of the Ronda. June 11. 1996 Distribute draft O.S. to City officials and bond attorney fbr review. June 13. 1996 Send O.S. and rating materials to Moody's invertors Service. June 13,1996 Distribute O.S. to underwriters. June 24, 1996 Ehlers receives bids for Bonds and praerm to City. City accepts bids and adopts molutbo approving the sale of the Bonds. Week of July 15. 19% Tentative closing date/receipt of funds. N.iWMATAwONT =W1BONVftUA1A Page 9 5AZ: MY OF MONTICLLLOr MINNESOTA General Obl pUm Bonds, Serks 19%A C*bd&eQ fetal Cosh W be NT*dNamb" prwwNosre hVicaCom callofluaaace ltrterwt Awnced Wolc Di RoadlFatlonAvcnw Shed and Udlitylttptovanenh 5163,700 $4,998.11 Briar Oakes Estate 2nd Addition 9602C . Shws. Utiliks, and Apputknant Work 5441- ➢ 213,49L,15 70TALE801HCTCOSTB ) j � mode. tcpl, nrrt, sdnilnWrttha ud wduwrixt� aircomt_ -- — y 54,188.81 S 172,987 311 j77.44 1966.970 A 1 66413 IMAM Attachmei � Au"rauat Nat" Asteumaun to the bcncftWng ptnpetties and trunk hinds. Sanituy fewer, wMa train, ahcct conshoction, and aamm sewer "sewed in fall to tlta &%cloper. RESOLUTION 96- Councilmemher introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE SALE OF AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,060,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION, SERIES 1999A A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue in an amount not to exceed the City's $1,060,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 1996A (the "Bond"), to finance various improvements within the City and to refinance certain outstanding general obligations of the City; and B. WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers and Associates, Inc., in Minneapolis, Minnesota ("Ehlers"), as its independent financial advisor for the Bonds and is therefore authorized to solicit proposals in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 476.60, Subdivision 2(9); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of City of Monticello, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Authorization- Fin in". The City Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to solicit proposals for the sale of the Bonds. 2. M ingPropmal Q=ning. The City Council shall meet at the time and place to be specified in the Terms of Proposal for the purpose of considering sealed proposals for, and awarding the We of, the Bonds. The City Administrator, or designee, shall open proposals at the time and place specified in such Terms of Proposal. 3. Tem of Prey +pat. The terms and conditions of the Bonds and the sale thereof are to be fully set forth in the "Terms of Proposal." 4. Qf rinl Staternent. In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City are hereby authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember and, after Hill discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following Council members voted in favor thereof. 5AK Resolution 96 - Page 2 and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Dated this 26th day of May, 1998. Mayor City Administrator (SEAL) SW L RESOLUTION 98. Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE SALE OF AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $470,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1996B A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue in an amount not to exceed the City's $470,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1996E (the "Bonds"), to refinance certain outstanding general obligations of the City; and WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers and Associates, Inc., in Minneapolis, Minnesota ("Ehlers"), as its independent financial advisor for the Bonds and is therefore authorized to solicit proposals in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of City of Monticello, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Authorization -Findings. The City Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to solicit proposals for the sale of the Bonds. 2. Meeting• Propmal ppPnin. The City Council shall meet at the time and place to be specified in the Terms of Proposal for the purpose of considering sealed proposals for, and awarding the We of, the Bonds. The City Administrator, or designee, shall open proposals at the time and place specified in such Terms of Proposal. 3. TeraL of Proposal. The terms and conditions of the Bonds and the sale thereof are to be fully set forth in the "Terms of Proposal." 4. Offi inl SLatement. In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City are hereby authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion. The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember and, after ftill discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following Council members voted in favor thereof`. Resolution 96 - Page 2 and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Dated this 28th day of May, 1996. Mayor City Administrator (SEAL) Sff Al RESOLUTION 96- Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE SALE OF AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $598,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION SEWER INTERCEPTOR BONDS, SERIES 19980 A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue in an amount not to exceed the City's $695,000 General Obligation Sewer Interceptor Bonds, Series 1996C (the "Bonds"), to refinance certain outstanding general obligations of the City, and B. WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers and Associates, Inc., in Minneapolis, Minnesota ("Ehlers"), as its independent financial advisor for the Bonds and is therefore authorized to solicit proposals in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of City of Monticello, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Authorizatinn; Fin in2p. The City Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to solicit proposals for the sale of the Bonds. 2. Me ting; Proposal �o—ng. The City Council shall meet at the time and place to be specified in the Terms of the Proposal for the purpose of considering sealed proposals for, and awarding the sale of, the Bonds. The City Administrator, or designee, shall open proposals at the time and place specified in such Tema of Proposal. 3. TprmFt of Proumn]. The terms and conditions of the Bonds and the salo thereof are to be fully act forth in the "Terms of Proposal." 4. Official Statement. In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City aro hereby authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember and, after bill discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following Council members voted in favor thereof. Resolution 96 - Page 2 and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Dated this 28th day of May, 1996. 1Mayor City Administrator (SEAL) i Council Agenda - 5/28/96 6a. Co Rid ration of Hquor store Night/Weekend Super visor AppaintmpnL (R.W.) A. REFERENCE ND BACKGROUND: Recently, our Assistant Liquor Store Manager, Wanda Goenner, resigned to take a job with Cub Foods in Elk River. In discussing the vacancy with Manager Joe Hartman, we felt it was a good time to take a look at the position te see if we wanted to continue in the same fashion with the job description classified as an Assistant Manager, or whether it wouldn't be more appropriate to redo the job description to fit what the position really was, and that is a Night/Weekend Supervisor. With the Assistant Manager primarily the afternoon and Saturday shift, this position was covering the main responsibility we were concerned about, and that is having someone on a permanent basis who would be supervising the part-time employees while the Manager was absent. Normally, you would associate the Assistant Manager's duties to include a lot of the same functions of the Manager in overseeing the operation, including purchasing, inventory, maintenance, and data entry, along with bookkeeping activities. With the past scheduling of the Assistant Manager shift being normally 2 p.m. until closing and Saturdays, many of the management functions other than supervising were not being accomplished by the Assistant Manager position. In light of this, Joe and I felt it would be more appropriate to revise the job description accordingly to simply indicate that this was a fill -time clerk position that would have supervisory responsibility. In revising the job description, we determined that we were able to lower the grade level of this position to grade 3 from the grade 6 classification for the Assistant Manager. As a result, this revised position will have a lower salary range and would currently be in the range of $9.69 to $12.12 an hour from the Assistant Manager's classification range of $11.49 to $14.36 per hour. The position was posted as available to all current city employees, and an ndvertisement was placed in the Monticello Shopper for the position. Ms. Tracy Eisele, a current part-time liquor atom clerk since January, expressed an interest in the full -tame position. After reviewing the applicants that had applied for the position through the advertisement. Joe was not impressed with any particular applicant outside of the organization and felt that Tracy was doing excellent work so far as a part-time clerk. Joe felt that Tracy could turn into an excellent employed and is recommending that she be given the opportunity to work as the fill -time Night/Woekond Supervisor position. As always, all hill -limo employees have a six-month probationary period, and this would give Joe and myself ample opportunity to review the progress. Council Agenda • 5/28/98 Approve the appointment of Ms. Tracy Eisele to the position of Night/Weekend Supervisor position at the liquor store. This position replaces the previous Assistant Manager position. Do not appoint Ms. Eisele to the position and request that we readvertise for applicants. C. STAFF REE.COMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of Joe and myself that Ms. Eisele's appointment be approved. Although she has only worked part time for Joe for the past four months, Joe has been impressed with her capabilities to date and feels she would fit in nicely with the job position as modified. Copy of revised job description. Night/Weekend Liquor Store Clerk Supervisor City of Monticello Title of Class: Senior Liquor Store Clerk Effective Date: April 25, 1996 DESCRIPTION OF WORK General ti a pm nt of Duties- Performs lead and retail sales work assisting customers locate and purchase store merchandise; and performs related duties as required. Sunervigion Received: Works under the general supervision of the Liquor Store Manager. Suiterv►gion Exercised: Provides technical work direction to liquor store staff in Liquor Store Manager's attendance. TYPICAL DUTIES PERFORMED The listed examples may not include all duties performed by all positions in this class. Duties may vary somewhat from position to position within a class. Supervises staff during shift, including afternoons, evenings, and weekends. Checks patrons ID's and verifies data on checks; refuses service when needed. Stocks coolers and shelves with liquor, wine and beer; stocks cigarette making; makes six packs. Makes changes to displays or signs as directed by Manager. Assists customers by locating merchandise, recommending purchases if requested, ringing up purchases on the cash register, collecting money and making change. Assists the customer in carrying merchandise to their vehicles as needed. Recommends purchases including typo, quantity, and brand when requested by patrons. Assists the Manager with ordering by recording requests for items not in stock and noting items that are running low; Reports to Manager any pricing errors. Stocks and rotates stock with heavy emphasis on beer. Assists Manager in conducting inventories of stock. Assists with cleaning the store including cleaning backroom, washing glass doors, cleaning windows, vacuuming, cleaning coolers and bathrooms, dusting shelves and merchandise. Takes out the garbage; shovels snow; and makes cardboard bales. May review invoices and verify accuracy of merchandise deliveries. (continued on next page) 0.4 Night/Weekend Liquor Store Clerk Supervisor City of Monticello Participates in quarterly physical inventory. Assigns duties and tasks to shift employees to ensure prompt service and a complete product selection. Monitors and verifies employee adherence to work rules, policies, and schedules during shift. Maintains open communication channels with Manager and other staff members; informs Manager of all maintenance needed, including building, cooler, and parking lot repairs. May assist Manager in performing employee performance evaluations. Reports liquor -related violations to Manager or appropriate law enforcement agency. Closes out cash register when closing up at night, put money, in the safe, and lock doors. May respond to after hour emergency calls involving store security. KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, AND ABILITIES Working knowledge of merchandising and customer service in a retail environment. Working knowledge of how to operate a cash register and make correct change. Working knowledge of merchandise locations. Working knowledge of record keeping and routine bookkeeping. Working skill in the use of a computer and calculator. Considerable ability to deal courteously with City employees, department staff, and the general public. Working ability to perform mathematical calculations and prepare reports. Working ability to lift and carry objects weighing up to 40 pounds, and to bend, stoop, reach, and stretch. Working ability to use judgement and discretion in sales based on age, state of inebriation, and/or possibility of bad checks. Working ability to supervise staff. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS Six months of work experience in a liquor store or retail setting. A' Council Agenda - 5/28/96 5c. Consideration of adv fine for bide for rwn]noemen_t of hrielca nt rity hAll. (J.S.) For the past couple of years, we have been looking at putting together a project to repair and replace some of the brick at city hall. City hall was constructed of a porous, sometimes crack -faced brick called "Chicago Used." This brick appears to hold up well where it is not exposed to high amounts of moisture and freeze/thaw cycles such as under the eaves of buildings. It has not, however, held up well where it has direct contact with rain water from roofs and such. We have several areas around the city hall building where the brick has deteriorated. In 1994, we solicited prices from a firm specializing in this type of work but were astonished at the cost to clean the building, replace the brick, and then seal the entire surface of the building. The estimated coat at that time was in the neighborhood of $20,000, and we were unable to obtain another contractor interested in doing the work. This year we have prepared a detailed set of specifications and estimated the brick needed to be replaced at about 300. However, by the time one is finished with replacing the worn or damaged brick, the actual brick count can double and be in the neighborhood of 700 or so due to having to remove adjacent brick. City staff is, therefore, requesting to advertise for bids based upon the specifications and to have the bids returnable on June 20, 1996. These bids will be reviewed by the City Council on June 24, with the work scheduled to be completed by September 30, 1998. We have budgeted the following amounts toward this project: IM" AMOUNT 1994 $10,000 1995 $10,000 1996 $19,750 The first alternative would be to authorize advertisement for bids for brick repair and replacement at city hall as outlined in the specifications. The second alternative would be not to advertise for bids. Council Agenda - 5/28/98 C. STAFF RPrOMMFNDATTON; It is the recommendation of the City Administrator and Public Works Director that the City Council authorize advertisement for bide as outlined in alternative Ul to be returnable on June 20, 1998, and to be reviewed by the City Council at the June 24 meeting. None. The specifications for brick repair and replacement at city hall are in the draft stage and will be available at Tuesday evenings meeting. Council Agenda - 6/28/96 so. Co sideration of hitUrninm.a V&VIngpl%deetg. (J.S.) PART - VnnRideration of ndvartliginsr for bids for over n3dnng of the commuter parking lot. PART S• Consideration of advert Ring for bila_ for overlaavang hituminoun aren nt the Office of Public Workg and a 11innil e:pan_aion of the psarkingAma. A- :LFFFRFNCF AND BA .KGROLLU l: PART A: We originally budgeted for overlaying the 1981 Commuter Parking Lot for the 1993 construction season. City staff then decided, due to the expected estimated cost of $25,000, to approach Wright County to obtain some financial assistance for the project, as they are the fee title holder of the property, and the City has the right to use it only for purposes related to transportation because of its original ties to turn back road right-of-way. City staff approached Commissioner Pat Sawatzke and County Highway Engineer Wayne Fingalson in 1994 in regard to funds for the commuter parking lot. Both of these individuals indicated that the County would not be interested in funding the park and ride lot overlay. Without their support, it would be extremely difficult to try to obtain the support of the other commissioners from other districts. We had placed an amount of $25,000 in the budget to do this work; and aside from a little more base work to do than what was originally proposed, we should be relatively near this budget amount. PART: In 1995, we completed our paving on the east side of the public works facility. Since we lost some of our parking with the addition of Phase 11, we need to expand the parking lot to add a few more spaces to the west of the Office of Public Works, and overlay the pavement in and about the Once of Public Works, which is at least o couple of decades old. This work would also include some curbing to keep us in compliance with our own ordinances. We originally estimated the cost of this work at approximately $20,000, and that is the amount that has been placed in the 1996 Budget. D_ ALTFRNATIVF. ACTION : The first alternative is to authorize advertisement for bids for PART A: Overlaying the commuter parking lot, and PART B: Overlaying the bituminous area around the Office of Public Works and expanding the parking area, with the addition of adding some curbing. Total amount budgeted for both projects is $46,000. Council Agenda - 6/28/96 The second alternative would be to do only one of the projects at this time. The third alternative would be to do neither of the projects this year. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the City Council authorize advertisement for bids for both of these projects to be returnable June 20, 1996, to be reviewed at the June 24 Council meeting, with the expected completed date of both projects of September 30, 1996. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Maps of the commuter parking lot showing the areas to be overlayed and the estimated quantities; Map of the public works facility showing the areas to be overlayed, parking to be added, and cu=b to be installed, along with estimated quantities. � CoNcer'R+ S'Pi� a:ryt 3o"w.ot x 9'i'�..tK JO�C�O riy P1.nCtY ML Fag: t x g7ia�v5rory ) omrn"4sK of N Bps . RVAIAL & O"t 1*q r . � ,� of TA*wspcomdQ, t! ' o ItGNT � { NarM.OF1'i`LTb C eT 66Q6 ruac errin«tter R04P.•I+�CMR[it.•A6Clf t r o• .ra►p cot.+dat' • v.ms v.r. 8tr• MaR4 o.nn.•e Pr.w.a rte' VEHIC\LF.STOR>, GIE F..tCILITN FFE 938 07 OV E of 9 93773 EXISTING WATER DEPART. 931.54 OFFICE BUILDING 43 �Jo EXISTING MAINTENANCI SHOP IM Z QUANTITIES FOR OVERLAY Base Repair 2' (Including cut out & disposaq 70 ton Tack 360 gallon Type 41 Wear 835 ton Common Ex 55 cu. yd. Class 5 35 cu. yd. Base 2331 25 ton Type 41 Wear 220 ton Tack Coat 100 gallon Curb & Gutter B-612 210 On. ft. C tWFMl0YWM60n OR. 60M Sb C.,� Council Agenda - 6/28/98 ss. Consideration of a resolution aecentInng plans and Faledflentions and anthorizine advertisement for bi s --B A_r kas Rotate 2nd d &tion and River Street sanitary sewer reconstruction; nd oo sideration of adapting a resolution stating intent to re mhnnze the City for Briar Oakes Estate 2nd Addition prject costs. (J.O.) A. RFFERFNQE AND BA .K .RO INn: City Council is asked to adopt a resolution accepting plane and specifications for grading and construction of streets and utilities for phase II of the Briar Oakes Estate subdivision. The plans also include the River Street sanitary sewer reconstruction. Council is also asked to adopt a resolution stating the City's intent to reimburse the City for project expenditures relating to the Briar Oakes Estate 2nd Addition. Approval of plans and specifications along with authorization of advertisement for bids seta the stage for a bid opening on June 28, 1996, followed by a proposed project award date of July 8, 1996. The plans have been prepared by the City Engineer and meet minimum design standards. The grading plan has been designed to minimize project impact on the forested areas. Home site grading will be completed on a site - by -site basis. B Al TERNATIVF. ACTION4; 1. Motion to adopt a resolution accepting plane and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for Briar Oakes Estate 2nd Addition and River Street sanitary sewer reconstruction; and adopt a resolution stating intent to reimburse the City for Briar Oakes Estate 2nd Addition project costs. 2. Motion to deny acceptance of plans and specifications, do not authorize advertisement for bids, and do not adopt a resolution stating intent to reimburse the City for project costs. V QTAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the resolution approving plane and specifications for both projects, as well as the resolution stating the City's intent to reimburse. Copy of resolutions for adoption. Plans and specifications will be available ibr review at city hall, RESOLUTION 96- RESOLUTION 6 RESOLUTION RELATING TO FINANCING OF CERTAIN PROPOSED PROJECTS TO BE UNDERTAKEN BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO ESTABLISHING COMPLIANCE WITH REIMBURSEMENT BOND REGULATIONS UNDER THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, (the "City") as follows: 1. Be<citall3. (a) The Internal Revenue Service has issued Section 1.103-18 of the Income Tax Regulations (the "Regulations") dealing with the issuance of bonds, all or a portion of the proceeds of which are to be used to reimburse the City for project expenditures made by the City prior to the date of issuance. (b) The Regulations generally require that the City make a prior declaration of its official intent to reimburse itself for such prior expenditures out of the proceeds of a subsequently issued borrowing, that the borrowing occur and the reimbursement allocation be made from the proceeds of such borrowing within one year of the payment of the expenditure or, if longer, within one year of the date the project is placed in service, and that the expenditure be a capital expenditure. (c) The City desires to comply with requirements of the Regulations with respect to certain projects hereinafter identified. Official Intent nPriaratinn. (a) The City proposes to undertake the following projects described on Exhibit A attirched hereto. (b) Other than (i) expenditures to be paid or reimbursed from sources other than a borrowing, or (ii) expenditures permitted to be reimbursed pursuant to the transition provision of Section 1.103-1811)(2) of the Regulations, or (iii) expenditures constituting preliminary expenditures as defined in Section 1.103-18(il(2) of the Regulations, no expenditures fur the foregoing projects as identified on Exhibit A have heretofore been made by the City and no expenditures will be made by the City until after the ditto of this Resolution. (c) The City reasonably expects to reimburse the expenditures made for costs of the designated projects out of the proceeds of debt (the "ponds") to be incurred by (ho City after the date of payment of all or a portion of the costs. All reimbursed expenditures shall he capital expenditures as defined in Section 1.150.1(h) of the Regulations. SElt- Resolution 96 - Page 2 (d) This declaration is a declaration of official intent adopted pursuant to Section 1.103-18 of the Regulations. Ruda to y Matters. As of the date hereof, there are no City funds reserved, allocated on a long-term basis, or otherwise set aside (or reasonably expected to be reserved, allocated on a long-term basis, or otherwise set aside) to provide permanent financing for the expenditures related to the projects, other than pursuant to the issuance of the Bonds. This resolution, therefore, is determined to be consistent with the City's budgetary and financial circumstances as they exist or are reasonably foreseeable on the date hereof, all within the meaning and content of the Regulations. Filin . This resolution shall be filed within 30 days of its adoption in the publicly available official books and records of the City. This resolution shall be available for inspection at the office of the City Clerk at the City Hall (which is the main administrative office of the City) during normal business hours of the City on every business day until the date of issuance of the Bonds. Reimhursement. Allocations. The City's financial officer shall be responsible for making the "reimbursement allocations" described in the Regulations, being guneraiiy the transfer of the appropriate amount of proceeds of the Bonds to reimburse the source of temporary financing used by the City to make payment of the prior costs of the projects. Each allocation shall be evidenced by an entry on the official books and records of the City maintained for the Bonds, shall specifically identify the actual prior expenditure being reimbursed or, in the case of reimbursement of a fund or aeoount in aomrdance with Section 1.103.18, the fund or account from which the expenditure was paid, and shall be effective to relieve the proceeds of the Bonds from any restriction under the bond resolution or other relevant legal documents for the Bonds, and under any applicable elate statute, which would apply to the unspent proceeds of the Bonds. Adopted this day of .1996. Mayor City Administrator sFB Resolution 96 - Page 3 EXHIBIT A Estimated Cost to be Reimbursed From Bond Proceeds Construction of sanitary sewer, water main, $441,900 streets, and storm sewer for Briar Oakes Estate 2nd Addition, Project 96-02C SEco Council Agenda - 6/28/96 Se. o aid ration of adopting development and disbursement artreements and approving final plat—Hlein F rma 2nd Addition - (J.0.) A_ REFERENCE AND RACKGROU-Nn: In accordance with Tony Emmerich's plans for development of the Klein Farms subdivision, Emmerich is moving forward on the second phase of the development. The second phase is somewhat smaller than the first phase and consists of 38 single family lots. There are no twinhomes to be developed with the second phase. Much of the property has already been graded, and a portion of the water main has already been installed in the second phase. The preliminary plat has already been approved, and the feasibility of extending sewer, water, storm sewer, etc., has been established. The main difference between the first phase and the second phase is that in the second phase, Emmerich is requesting to complete the project on a private basis as opposed to following the public improvement process as he did in the first phase. Under this scenerio, the Iflein Farms 2nd Addition development agreement is patterned after the River Mill subdivision. As you recall, with the River Mill subdivision, a disbursement agreement was established which placed funds equal to the cost to complete the project with a lending institution. The lending institution could release the funds for payment for work completed only upon approval by both the developer and the City Engineer. In the event the private developer did not complete the work as required, the development and disbursement agreements allow the City to draw from the funds available to properly complete the project. This arrangement worked fairly well with the River Mill subdivision. The main benefit of this arrangement is that the City does not need to bond for public improvements; and since there is no assessment against each property because the cost for improvements is paid privately, there is no subsequent risk of a default on assessment payments. The primary hazard with this type of arrangement is reduced control over the private contractor that's completing the construction activities. Egvrionce has shown us, however, that although our control is not as firm as when the City completes the project, it is sufficient to guarantee that the work is done properly and in a manner consistent with City standards. 13_ AI.TF.RNATIVE ACTIONS; Motion to approve the final plat and adopt disbursement and development agreements governing Klein Farms 2nd Addition. Motion Council Agenda - 5/28/98 is contingent on review and approval of the agreements by the City Attorney. Approval of the final plat is contingent on final review of construction easement requirements. Approval of plans and specifications is contingent on approval by the public works department. Under this alternative, construction activities would be allowed to commence once the development and disbursement agreements have been executed. It is not necessary that Council grant specific approval of the detailed plane due to the fact that engineering feasibility has been established already, no engineering issues exist, and the work will not be done via the public improvement process. However, it is important that the public works department review and approve the plan set prior to commencement of construction. Motion to deny adoption of the 1Qein Farms 2nd Addition development and disbursement agreements. City Council should select this alternative if it does not wish to allow public utilities to be constructed privately or if Council would like to see the detailed plan set prior to approval of related agreements. r STAFF RF .O MF.NDATION: I recommend that the City Council approve the final plat and adopt the disbursement and development agreements contingent on final review and approval by the City Attorney. The development and disbursement agreements are patterned closely after the River Mill agreements, which were developed by the City Attorney. I suspect that he will not have any problems with the agreements as prepared. As noted earlier, there is leas financial risk to the City associated with completing projects privately, and quality control is adequate. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of the final plat; Letter from Bret Weiss regarding the project. Copy of the development and disbursement agreements are available for review at city hall. EMN FARMS 2ND ADDITION ou�c �cr� Y6r J a _ N _ .7 EMN FARMS 2ND ADDITION ou�c �cr� Y6r J WSS &Associates, Inc. April 23, 1996 Mr. Jeff O'Neill City of Monticello P.O. Box 1147 Monticello, MN 55362 350 Westwood Lake Office 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55426 612-541-4800 FAX 541-1700 Re: Development of Plans and Specifications Klein Farms 2nd Addition City of Monticello Project No. WSB Project No. 1025.00 Dear Mr. O'Neill: B.A. Mimisle & P.E. w- A wn. P.E P— R. Wilknhring. P.E I—Ad W. Srcmw. P.E. R—Ad B. Bur. PJ - According to our recent conversations, Tony Emmerich is planning to move forward with the second phase of Klein Fanns which encompasses a development of 38 single-family lots. Tltc final plat is in the process of being reviewed at the County and %ve have in our possession for review of casement locations and our engineering sign -off. 'Pony has indicated an interest in moving forward with the project with the plans completed by the City Engineer similar to a public improvement project, however, he would intend on using his own contractor and entering into a disbursement agreement with the City for paying for the improvements. 'this is the type of situation we had recently discussed using so that the City has more control over the actual project design and construction and can more effectively meet the developer's schedules. We would follow all other standards of a public improvement project with the development of the feasibility report more fur the developer's needs than for the City Council. For this project in particular, however, the feasibility report was completed in 1995 for the second phase in addition to the first phase. We intend to make slight modifications to that feasibility report, adjust the cost as necessary, and present that to the Council at the May 13th Council Meeting. Mr. Emmerich would like to have the project under way as soots as possible and is willing to put a deposit with the City to pay for the cost% of the plans. 'I his should be approved by the City Council at their May 13th meeting, along with the preliminary developer's agreement and disbursement agreement. Infrortmeturr • Engineers - Plannen II�WU.1WWRIUNIIY IMPIO1'I:R Fie 'a We have estimated the cost of the project to be approximately $306,000, which would result in an engineering fee of $23,419. Typically, the feasibility report amounts to 15% of the engineering costs, however, in this case since much of the base work is done, we would propose to reduce our fire by 10% to account for the work previously completed. Consequently, our fee would amount to $21,077 and would be paid according to the same schedule, with the exception that the feasibility report would be paid at 5% instead ol'the normal 15% and the total project payout would be 90% of the total cost. Please give me a call at your convenience at 541-4800 to discuss this issue in greater detail. Sincerely, IYSB & Associates, Inc. Bret A. Weiss, P.G. City Engineer SFC Council Agenda - 5/28/96 arty (R.W.) From the Board of Review meeting held May 8, City Assessor Jerry Kramber was instructed to re-evaluate a number of parcels and report back to the City Council with his findings. Mr. Kramber has completed the process of re- examining those parcels and will be in attendance at the Council meeting Monday night to present his recommendations. After Mr. Kramber reviews the findings with the Council, the Council will be asked to accept or modify the recommendations as presented. Each property owner then has the opportunity to continue any appeal process by appearing before the Wright County Board of Equalization if they still feel their property values are not properly calculated. With the 1995-1996 assessment process being completed, the Krambers have indicated they are willing to continue as the City Assessors for another year if the City desires. Due to the growing number of building permits the City has experienced, the Krambers have requested an increase in their contract amount from the current $5.75 per parcel to $6.50 per parcel. This increase will cover the time and expense of viewing approximately 400 additional parcels per year. As a reference, the current contract amounted to $13,369 for 2,325 parcels. The new contract at $6.50 per parcel is estimated at $15,112. The current $5.75 per parcel rate has been in effect for the last three assessment years, and the Krambers have not increased it since the 1992-1993 assessment year. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: DECISION 1: PROPERTY RE-EVALUATIONS 1. Accept the recommendations of the City Assessor in regard to the properties that were requested to be re-evaluated. 2. Modify the Assessor's recommendations if the Council feels adjustments are warranted. Council Agenda - 5/28/96 DECISION 2: CONTRACT RENEWAL Renew the contract for city assessing services with the Krambers for $6.50 per parcel. Do not renew the contract. STAFF F .O NDATION: In regard to the assessing contract for next year, I am not aware of any major problems with the assessing contract over the past four or five years. The rate per parcel has remained unchanged for the last three years, and the proposed rate of $6.60 per parcel is in line with what the County Assessor's office charges other communities for which they work, including the City of Buffalo. As a result, it would seem reasonable that the Krambers be paid the same fee as the City of Buffalo is currently being charged in that both communities are growing at about the same rate and have the similar type of properties to be reviewed. In regard to the re-evaluations, staff does not have any recommendations. D_ 4 IPPORTINII DATA None. To the City Council of Monticello and those concerned: f A t copy In reference to the proposed valuations on the duplexes on Marvin Elwood Rd. it is my opinion that they should be valued using an income approach as there have been no recorded sales recently. Mr. Terry Seestrom has informed me that he has had his actively listed for 587,000.00 and has not had an offer. Therefore using the income approach the calculations would be as follows; Gross annual income: 511.640.00 (average rental per mo. 5485.00 per tide) less: 5% vacancy rate -582.00 las: proposed taxes 2.600.00 less: insurance 340.00 Effective Annual Income: S8,118.00 Capitalization rate of 9% (58,11&001994) Indicated Value of Building $90.200.00 Assumptions: Capitalization rate rellecb current interest rate for mortgage on rental property if prospect were to •urebase now. Depreciation would be offset by actual operating expenses and improvements at current tax laws. These propeRies cannot be sold individually therefore only have value as investment property. Indicated Value of Building includes personal property of all the appliances (range, ref hood. washer, dryer a 2) 1 am sorry 1 am not able to attend tonight's meeting however would appreciate your attention to this matter, and informing me of the outcome In case 1 need to pursue this further. 7banl Yo/ L' 1 Tom Holthaus Council Agenda - 6/28/96 (J.OJ City Council is asked to consider adopting the development agreement governing terms and conditions associated with connecting lfjellbergs East Mobile Home Park to the city sanitary sewer system. The development agreement has been prepared with the assistance of Paul Weingarden and reflects Council direction given at the January 22, 1988, meeting of the City Council, at which time Council gave conceptual approval of connecting the east park to city services contingent on a number of conditions, which have been incorporated into the development agreement. As you will note, there has been some delay in completion of the development agreement, which was due in large part to discussions between the City and Kiellberg's engineer with regard to the design of the sanitary sewer system in the expansion area of the east park. After considerable discussion, a final design has been accepted, which does involve removal and replacement of all manholes and replacement of a critical section of sewer line. Now that the engineering issues appear to be resolved, it is time to put everything on paper in final form and take the final steps prior to actual connection of the east park to city services. The development agreement is relatively short and speaks for itself; therefore, I will not review it any further ther in this memo. The agreement has been reviewed by Rick Wolfsteller, John Simola, and Bret Weiss. I have enclosed a copy of the meeting minutes from the January meeting so that you can compare commitments made at that time to the terms and conditions in the development agreement. I believe that we've covered everything outlined in the meeting minutes and more in the development agreement. Please note that the option of allowing Nellborg to rnove trailers into the development prior to completion of the work as promised earlier is spy included in the agreement. This provision was left out due to advice from the City Attorney. Originally, we agreed that homes could be moved in if lfjellberg placed funds on deposit for disbursement at such time that the work is completed. The thought was that the City could use the funds in the event the work was not done. The City Attorney is not dead -set against this concept but believes it is much cleaner to make KjeUberg get all of the work done before ho moves any homes in. Our Attorney noted that it might not be is Council Agenda - 6/28/96 a simple or easy matter to install the required improvements on private property even if we have the money through the disbursement agreement. I am sure that Kjellberg will want to haggle with Council over this issue. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt the development agreement outlining terms and conditions associated with connection of the Kjellberg East Mobile Home Park and expansion area to city sanitary sewer. Under this alternative, once Kjellberg pays $18,000 to the City, he will be allowed to commence construction of the project. Actual connection of a single mobile home would not be allowed to occur until he pays an additional $18,000. 2. Motion to deny adoption of the development agreement. Council should select this alternative if it does not believe that the development agreement accurately reflects the conceptual agreement established in January or if there are other terms or conditions that need to be added to the agreement. C. STAFF RECOhMFNDATION: I recommend that the development agreement be adopted. Once adopted, and assuming that Nellberg will follow suit, the City Engineer, Public Works Director, and I will be making our final review of the plans to guarantee that the expansion area is being developed in a manner consistent with the requirements of the R-4 zoning district and long-term storm water management plane. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of development agreement; City Council meeting minutes from January 22, 1996. MAY. -24' 96(FRII 11:49 OLSON/USSET P. A. TEL:612 925 5879 P.002 DEVELOPE8 AUEMMT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 1996 by and between the City of Monticello, a municipal corporation organl:ed under the laws of the State of M:L=eaota (the "City'), and Kjellberg, Inc. (the •Developer•). WHEREAS, the Developer wishes to extend sewer into a manufactured home park presently consisting of 93 unite, and also wishes to develop an additional 26 unite in the manufactured home park, and within the City of Monticello, known as Rjellbexg's East Mobile Home park; and WHEREAS, the City is w1lling to permit extension of Bever and development of additional unite in the manufactured home park under the terms and condition set forth in this Agreemamt; NOW, THEREFORB, it is hereby agreed: 1. Proposed proieet. The Developer intends to develop 26 additional manufactured home eites. This Agreement provides only for the development of the 26 unite and extension of sewer into the existing park and no additional development. If the Developer wishes to develop additional units he shall enter into additional development agreements for the proposed additional development. 1. Develoner IMprovementa. The Developer shall install at hie own cost the following local improvementoi Sanitary Sever, Storm Sewer, Concrete Curb and Gutter and Bituminous Surfacing and appurtenances; together with the other improvements described in this paragraph and Subparagraphs. A complete set of detailed plans and specifications shall be prepared by the Developer and shall be submitted for approval by the City Engineer prior to the Developer beginning work on the improvements. The plans shall be submitted to the City Engin,ser and the Engineer's approval shall have boon obtained not later than July 1, 1996. In the event Developer fails to obtain such approval on or before July 1, 1996, this agreement shall be null and void and all amounts theretofore paid to the City, less any amounts expanded by the City in connection with this agreement, shall be refunded to the Devoloper. The work shall be completed in accordance with said approved plans and specifications on filo with the City, which awe hereby made a part of Chia Agreement. Upon completion of the improvements as set forth in this paragraph and Subparagraphs, the Developer shall provide as constructed plans of the improvemento in the area of the additional unite and the hook up to the City sewer system. 74 MAY. -24' 961FR11 11:50 OLSO$/USSET P. A. TEL:612 925 SM P.003 a. Streets and Trails. The Developer shall grade all private streets, boulevards, and driveways in accordance with approved plans. b. Soils. Developer shall insure that adequate and suitable soils shall exist in the areas of private street or utility improvements and shall guarantee the removal or replacement of substandard or unstable material. The cost of said removal or replacement is the responsibility of the Developer. c. Grading/Drainage Plan and Ea9emante. The Developer shall provide the City with a grading and drainage master plan for the entire facility, to be approved by the City Engineer and shall construct drainage facilities in accordance therewith. The Owner and Developer agree to grant to the City all necessary easements or rights-of-way for the preservation of said drainage system, for drainage basins, for utility service and for utility looping. All such easements or rights-of-way required by the City shall be in writing, in recordable form, on such terms and conditions as the parties shall determine. The grading and drainage plan shall include lot elevations, storm sewer, manholes, catch basins and other appurtenances, erosion control structures and detantion, retention and sedimentation facilities necessary to confirm with the overall City storm sewer plan, and shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to the beginning of construction of improvements. d. $treat sigae. The Developer shall be financially responsible for the installation of street identification signs and non-mechanical and non -electrical traffic control signs. The actual number, location, size, materials, color, mounting, and mounting height of the signs to be installed will be at the discretion of the City and actual installation shall be performed by the Developer. e. Driveways. The Developer shall be financially responsible to insure that bituminous hard surface driveways of at least 4e0 square fact are constructed on each additional unit being added to the park. f. $spa. The Developer shall provide 16 trees in the addition to manufactured home park in accordance with the plans and specifications. g. Street Lighting. Developer shall install street lighting in accordance with the approved plane and opacifications. -2- in RAY. -2Y'961FR11 11:50 OLSON/USSET P.A. TEL:612 925 5879 P.001 h. Erosion control. The Developer shall provide an acceptable plan for erosion control prior to issuing building permits and shall install and maintain such erosion control structures as appear necessary under the plan or become necessary subsequent thereto. The Developer shall be responsible for all damage caused an the result of grading and excavation within the above Development, including, but not limited to, restoration of existing control structures and cleanup and public right-of-way. As a portion of any erosion control plan, the Developer shall re -seed or sod any disturbed areae in accordance with the approved erosion control plan. J. Storm Shelters. Developer shall provide all storm shelters in accordance with all specifications and re irements as established by the State of Minnesota and in effect on the date of execution of this Contract. a. pay ng . Any contractor engineer preplane and specifications selected by the Developer to design, construct or install any improvements which will be buried or otherwise concealed must be registered by tho State of MinnCaota. b. Construction. The construction, installation, materials and equipment shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Engineer. Construction shall be completeland connections shall be made to City sewer on or before September 1, 1996. If ouch construction is not completed by that date, the fees and assessments set forth in paragraph 6 hereof shall be recalculated in accordance wit the City's fee schodulo then in effect. C. Insp&ceion. The Cit or its designated representative, shall inspect the following work performed by the Developer, his contract re, subcontractors or agents. 1) All connections to the City sewer and water eystom. 7) All pressure checke performed on all sewer and water lines, which pressure checks shall be performed prior to the inquanee of a permit allowing the connection to any sewer and water services according to the otanda i established and set forth by the City Engineer. -3- 70 MAY.-2a'96(FRI II:50 OLS01/USSET P. A. TEL:612 925 5879 P.005 The Developer shall notify the City at least two (2) working days prior to the performance of any of the above described work. Failure to notify the City to allow it to inspect said work shall result in the City's right to withhold the issuance of a permit allowing connection to any sewer or water services. Upon receipt of said notice the City shall have a reasonable time, not to be lees than five (5) working days, to inspect said improvements. The Developer hereby acknowledges and fully understands that if any sewer lines constructed by Developer, his contractors, subcontractors, or agents, fail to pass inspection or pressure testing, all repair or replacement as directed by the City shall be at the Developer's sole coot and expense. Upon the failure to pass any inspection or pressure testing, the City, in its discretion, may proceed under Paragraph 5 "Default by Developer". in the event that work, now concealed, was done without permitting City inspection, the Developer shall be required, at his sole cost and expense, to expose the concealed condition for inspection purposes. Any inspection performed by the City is strictly for City purposes and shall not create any liability or warranty between the City and the Developer or Owner of the property. d. Faithful Performance of Construction Contracts. The Developer shall fully and faithfully comply with all terms of any and all contracts entered into by the Developer for the installation and construction of all of his improvements and agrees to repair or replace as directed by the City, and at Developer's sole cost and expense, any work or materials that become defective, in the reasonable opinion of the City, within the time period specified in Paragraph 9. e. City Acceptance. Upon co"Pletion of the work and construction required to be done hereunder, the Developer shall give written notice, together with a certificate from the Developer's en ineer that all improvements have been completed in accordance with the ordinances and approved plane and specifications as submitted to the City. Subject to Paragraph ](c) the City shall thereafter issue permits for the connection of sewer and water services according to the requirements of the City Code. 4. Upon submission of the plane and •pacif cations for the development, Developer agrees to depooit with the City cash or a letter of credit forengineering and inspection expanses which will be incurred by the City in connection with the development an follows: s - 7D MAY. -24' 961FRU 11:51 OLS01/USSET P. A. TEL:612 925 5879 P. 006 Engineering: Inspection: TOTAL $ It is the express understanding of the parties hereto that the above -referenced figures relating to the engineering and inspection costs are estimates only and are not intended in any way to represent a guaranteed maximum cost. Should these estimates be exceeded, Developer understands that he is solely responsible for any such excess costs. If the engineering and inspection costs total less than a , the remaining balance on hand shall be refunded to Developer. All engineering and inspection expenses will be charged in accordance with Schedule A attached hereto and will be invoiced to the City with the day and number of hours worked by each individual and a brief description of the items of work completed. The City shall send copies of such invoices to Developer. S. Holding Pond. The parties hereby acknowledge that the area designated in the plans and specification as holding ponds exceeds the amount of ponding area needed for the development. It is hereby agreed that. the Developer shall grant the City in said excess area in the form of an easement for storm water run- off and storage purposes in lieu of storm water access fee which would otherwise be payable to the City. Developer hereby agrees that the excess dedication of land for the etc= water runoff and storage easement in lieu of access fees is reasonable, is reasonably related to the providing for drainage and development and le roughly proportional to the benefits conferred upon the development and the impact of the proposed development. 6. a. Developer shall install sanitary sewer in accordance with the plane and opecifications and permit Inspection of those linea in accordance with the reasonable request of the City's building inspector. The Developer shall furnish and install a sewage flow monitoring device acceptable to the City, and an underground chamber or manhole, which allows for safe access by City personnel for routine maintenance. The manhole or underground chamber and its access shall meet all applicable OSHA and safety codes for ventilation, fall restraint, etc. The developer shall pay all installation costs of the chamber and monitoring device, as well as annual recalibration and the cost of repair or replacement. The City will not charage for routine maintenance performed by City employees. During periods when tho flow monitoring device is inoperative, the City will estimate the flows based upon previous monitoring records. The device, inotallatlon and placement of the -S- U� NA)'. -2d' 961FR11 11:51 OLSON/USSET P. A. TEL:612 925 5879 P.001 device shall be subject to the approval of the City. The Developer shall pay the City $36,000.00 as and for sewer access connection fees for 120 manufactured homes. The Developer shall pay the City $18,000.00 upon execution of this Agreement and the balance prior to the City issuing any occupancy permits for the development. b. Developer agrees to pay area assessment charge relating to sanitary sewer in the amount of S37,S00.00. The charge shall be assessed against the property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and shall be payable over 15 years with interest at the rate of 7% percent per annum. Developer hereby waives any notices, notices of hearing, and hearings which may be required by law (including but not limited to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429) with relation to the area assessment charge and agrees that availability of City sewer increases the value of his property by at least the amount of the cost of constructing sewer lines plus the $37,500.00 payable hereunder. 7. Occunancv Permits. The Developer shall not move any manufactured homes into or onto the development nor shall the City be required to issue occupancy permit for any manufactured homes in the Development until the following have been completed: a. All improvements required by this Agreement shall have been completed to the satisfaction of the City. b. The Developer shall have made all payments required by this Agreement. C. The Developer shall have complied with all building codes, zoning codes, and all applicable ordinances, laws and regulations. d. The Developer shall have obtained all required permits and licenaca for the construction and operation of a manufactured home park. a. Upon notification by Developer that any of the Deve oyer Improvements have been completed, City Engineer shall inspect the Developer Improvements and, at hie solo diocrotion, determines if the Development Improvement(s) has been completed in accordance with the plans, opacifications and exhibits attached hereto. If the City Engineer determines that the Developer Improvement has been completed in accordance with all requirements, the City 8n ineor shall give the Developer written notice of acceptance within seven (7) days effective as of the date of the inspection. -6- 7F MAY.- 24'96IFR 11 11:51 OLSON/USSET P.1. TEL:612 925 S8i9 P.008 If the City Engineer determines that the Developer Improvements) is not completed in accordance with said requirements, the City Engineer shall notify Developer in writing of the deficiency and provide a reasonable date upon which to cure the deficiency. 9. Erosion and Drainage Control. The Developer shall provide and comply with erosion and drainage control plan requirements as described in Exhibit C and as otherwise required by City. As development progresses, the City may impose additional erosion and drainage control requirements if, in the sole opinion of the City Engineer, they would be useful and appropriate in controlling drainage and erosion. Developer shall promptly comply with such erosion and drainage control plans and with such additional instructions it receives from City. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. 10. MUL&A ce . a. The Developer will provide and maintain or cause to be maintained at all times during the process of constructing the Developer Improvements until six (6) months after acceptance of all Developer Improvements and, from time to time at the regaeot o! the City furnish with proof of payment of premiums oni 1) Comprehensive general liability insurance (including operations, contingent liability, operations of subcontractors, completed operations and contractual liability insurance) together with an owner s Contractor's Policy with limits against bodily injury, including death, and property damage (to include, but not be limited to dama$ea caused by erosion or flooding) which may arise out of the Developer'a work or the work of any of its subcontractors. Limits for bodily injury or death shall not be lees than $x00,000.00 for one person and $1,000,000.00 for each occurrancel limits for property damage shall not be lees than $200,000.00 for each occurrence. The City, City Engineer and Developer's Engineer shall be an additional named insured on said policy. Developer shall file a copy of the insurance coverage with the City upon request_ 2) Worker's compensation insurance, with statutory coverage. -7- 7G MAY. -24' 96(FR I )11:52 OLSOWUSSET P. A. TEL:612 925 SM P. OO9 11. Resnonsihility for Costa. a. The Developer shall pay all costa incurred by it or City in connection with the development, including but not limited to construction of Developer improvements, legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the plat, the preparation of this Agreement, and all reasonable costa and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development, including reasonable attorney's fees in the event City undertakes enforcement of this Agreement by City. b. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work until the bills are paid in full. 12. prohibitions Against Aesienmeat of Agreement Developer represents and agrees that (except for associating with other individuals or entities), prior to the completion of the Developer Improvements as certified by the City: a. Except only by way of ascurity for, and only for the purpose of obtaining financing necessary to enable the Developer or any successor in interest to the Property, or any part thereof, to perform its obligations with respect to the construction of the Developer Improvements under this Agreement, and any other purpose authorized by this Agreement, the Developer (except as so authorized) will not make or create, or Buffer to be made or created, any total or partial sale, assignment, conveyance, or transfer in any other mode or form of with respect to this Agreement or any interest therein, or any contract or agreement to do any of the same, without the prior written approval of City. b. In the absence of specific written agreement by the City to the contrary, no such transfer or approval by City shall be doomed to relieve Developer from any of its obligations. In the event that City approves a substitute developer and the Property is transferred to said substitute, the City agreos to relieve the Developer of liability from performance as described in this contract. Said substitute shall assume all responsibilities and rights of the Developer under this contract. 13. Miecollaneous. a. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties, their heirs, succeseors or aesigna, as the case may be. -e- 7f� MAT -24' 96(FR1) 11:52 OLSON/USSET P.1. TEL:612 925 5879 P.010 b. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not aff ect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. C. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To he binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties, and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. d. Future residents shall not be deemed to be third party beneficiaries of this Agreement. e. This Agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the Developer, its successors aad assigns. The Developer shall, at its expense record this Agreement in the Office of the Wright County Recorder. After the Developer has completed the work required under this Agreement, at the Developer's request the City will execute and deliver to Developer a release in recordable form. f. All partlea :.o thia Agreement acknowledge they have been represented by counsel and have entered into this Agreement freely and voluntarily. 14. games. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, or mailed to the Developer by united States mail, postage prepaid to the following address: , or such other addrean as may be designated in writing from time to time. Notices to City shall be in writing and either hand delivered to the City Administrator or mailed to City by united States mail, postage prepaid to the address: City of Monticello, 280 East Broadway, Monticello, Minnesota 88362. IN WITNESS WRSMF, City and Developer have signed this Developer' a Agreement the day and year first above written. CITY OF MONTICELLO CITY OF MONTICS= By: By: Brad Pyle Rick Nolfstel ler Its: Mayor Its: City Administrator .9- 7.r MAY. -24' 96(FR1) 11:52 OLSON/USSET P. A. TEL:612 925 5879 — P. 011 RJEId,BER4, INC. Hy: State of Minnesota) )69 County of Wright ) Its: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1996, by Mayor Brad Pyle and by City Administrator Rick Wolfsteller of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota Municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public state of Minnesota) )ss County of Wright ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1996, by the of Rjollberg, Inc., a Minnesota corporation on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public -10- 7r Council Minutes - 1/22/96 Consideration of add;ngjt.ems to the agenda_. A. Consideration ofconcelittial njillroval of a=ement governing sanitary sewer connection of the Ki ll� be[B Fngt and West Mohi1 Home Parks. Assistant Administrator Jeff ONeill reported that Kent Kjellberg has been negotiating with the City in an attempt to arrange hook-up of the Kjeflberg East and West Mobile Home Parks to the city sanitary sewer system. The conceptual proposal describing the terms for connection of the east park was summarized by O'Neill. He noted that the proposed terms were conceptual only and would need to be incorporated into a development agreement. Council discussed the east park; proposal in regard to on-site storm ponding and the private sewer system in the park. It was suggested by Consulting Engineer Bret Weiss that the City should retain the option of charging the fee at the time the east park contributes to the storm water run-off system; however, if additional ponding is provided, credit can be given against the required fees. In regard to the private sewer system, Public Works Director Simola noted that the present manholes don't meet construction standards and shoo d be upgraded. Kent Kjellberg, owner of the mobile home park, stated that he agreed to bring the manholes up to standards. Based on the Council discussion, the proposal for sanitary sewer connection for the east park was as follows: East Paras Proposal 1. Kjellberg will extend s utility line to the city system located north of the cast mobile home park and provide a deposit equal to the cost of a city inspector monitoring the private lino installation. 2. Nollberg agrees to payirig an arca assessment charge of $37,500 as a special assessment over 16 years. 3. The City will obtain storm water easement rights in excess of that which is required for the site in lieu of storm water access fees. Any difference in value between the extra land provided for storm water ponding and the required storm water fees shall be paid to the City by Kjellberg. 4. K4ellberg will pay a hookup foo of $36,300 (120 units x $300/ unit) prior to hook-up of any individual units installed in the expansion arca. Council Minutes - 1/22/96 Nellberg will pay the total cost to install a sewage flow meter device. Kjellberg will be allowed to place new mobile homes in the expansion area contingent upon the following: Prior to moving new homes into the expansion area, the sewer system installed in the expansion area must be upgraded to assure that the system is completely watertight and has increased capacity to handle all flows. B. Ncflberg must install all of the necessary improvements required under code such as installation of bituminous paving, completion of all grading, and installation of curb and gutter. If Kjellberg desires to move mobile homes into the expansion area prior to completion of the above work, he will be required to enter into a disbursement agreement. At the time tho development agreement is executed, Nellberg must provide a deposit of $18,000, which is equal to one-half of the connection fees. In addition, Kjellberg must provide a $2,000 deposit immediately to help fund the coat of completion of the development agreement. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO APPROVE THE ABOVE PROPOSAL FOR CONNECTING THE KJELLBERG EAST MOBILE HOME PARK TO THE CITY SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM AND TO AUTHORIZE PREPARATION OF A DEVELOPER AGREEMENT CONTINGENT ON KJELLBERG PROVIDING A $2,000 DEPOSIT. THE DEADLINE FOR MAKING THE DEPOSIT WAS SET AT JANUARY 22, 1996, AND THE DEADLINE FOR EXECUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WAS SET AT FEBRUARY 22, 1996. Motion carried unanimously. O'Ncill then outlined the proposal to hook-up the west mobile home park. He noted the PCA has agreed to increase the City's wastewater treatment loading limits in an amount equal to the load the City would receive from the west mobile homo park. The connection of the west park would not take place until lato 1997 or until there is sufficient capacity to serve it. Council discussed Nellberg's request to pay the 1995 hook-up rates for Cho west park expansion area. It was Council's view that all developers should pay the current hook-up.rato and that charging a lesser rate for K;jellborg's expansion area would set a precedent. Council Minutes - 1/22/96 Based on the Council discussion, the proposal for sanitary sewer connection for the west park was as follows: West Park Proposal 1. Kjellberg agrees to pay the cost to extend the necessary sanitary sewer lines; however, the City will install the line following city design standards and assess the expense against the west park. The assessment amount will be based on a diagonal alignment across adjacent City -owned property. 2. Nellberg will pay to obtain land or easements needed to accommodate the sewer line. 3. At such time that the City sells or develops its site adjacent to the mobile home park, a portion of the revenue equal to the value of the sanitary sewer line serving the site will be provided to i(jellberg as a repayment for his cost associated with extending the line. 4. 1(jellberg will pay an area assessment fee of $76,000 and hook- up fees in the amount of $180,000. These fees reflect the 1996 rates because it is an existing development and the City has been negotiating hook-up with 1(iellberg for a number of months. 1(jellberg agrees to pay $200,000 in cash, with the remaining amount of $66,000 to be assessed against the property. 6. Kjellberg will provide sanitary sewer and utility easements through his property and to points west of his site. 6. The prevailing policy for collecting garbage at the west park will apply, and the overall policy is subject to change. 7. 1(jellberg must pay the prevailing rate for hook-up of a future west park expansion area at the time of connection to city sanitary sewer service. 8. Kjellberg will pay the standard quarterly sower service fee. 9. The west mobile home park will be allowed to connect to the city sanitary sewer system after the wastewater treatment plant expansion project is completed. Council Minutes - 1/22/96 AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRAD FYLE AND SECONDED BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON TO APPROVE THE ABOVE PROPOSAL FOR CONNECTING THE KJELLBERG WEST MOBILE HOME PARK TO THE CITY SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM. MOTION INCLUDES AUTHORIZATION FOR THE ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR TO MEET WITH KJELLBERG TO NEGOTIATE A METHOD OF FINANCING THE E31,000 GAP BETWEEN THE 1996 (PREVAILING) AND 1995 HOOK-UP RATES IN REGARD TO THE EXPANSION AREA Motion carried ously. } 7 n1 Council Agenda - 6/28/96 raft )9= (0.IQ The City Council is requested to consider approving the Private Redevelopment Contract among the HRA, the City, and Cedrus Creek Craftsman, Inc. The Contract is a document which describes the amount, the method of delivery, and the timing of the TIF payment to the Redeveloper (Cedrus Creek). The Contract also describes the obligations of the Redeveloper, the Authority, and the City. The HRA will consider approval of the Contract at a special meeting of May 29, 1996. This will be the HRA's first review of the revised proposal for assistance in the amount of $40,000 for costs associated with the City -owned parcel. From the perspective of the Redeveloper's accountant and anticipated lender, the project is not doable without the proposed additional assistance. The Redeveloper and the lending institution received a draft copy of the Private Redevelopment Contract. PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT CONTRACT The draft copy of the entire Contract as prepared by Attorney Steve Bubul, Kennedy & Graven, is available at city hall for your review. The following is a summary of the Contract. Within Phase 1, the 2nd Addition or TIF District, the Redeveloper agrees to construct six 4•plex townhouse units valued at a minimum market value of $130,000 and four twinhome townhouse unite valued at a minimum market value of $160,000. Four of the twinhome units are to be completed no later than December 31, 1997; Four of the 4-plex units are to be completed no later than December 31, 1998; and two of the twinhome units are to he completed no later than December 31, 1999. The Authority agrees to reimburse the Redeveloper up to $130,000 of the purchase price paid by the Redeveloper for two of the throe parcels in Phase 1. The first $66,000 TIF assistance as follows: $32,600 paid at time the Redeveloper acquires the two parcels and $10,000 paid upon each date the Authority issues a Certificate of Completion for a tawnhouso but not -to - exceed the sum of $32,600. The second $86,000 TIF assistance as follows: $66,000 together with a noncompound interest rate of 8.60% per annum Council Agenda - 5/28/96 (semi-annual payments) commencing August 1, 1999, and ending February 1, 200_ in the amounts shown in Exhibit F. Interest shall commence to accrue on the Closing Date. The Authority shall retain the first 60% of the Available Tax Increment as reimbursement for the first $65,000 TIF assistance and the $15,000 coat to acquire the City parcel. The semi -payment due the Redeveloper shall be solely from 40% of the Available Tax Increment. If on the payment date, the Available Tax Increment is insufficient for the Authority to recover its full reimbursement, the Redeveloper agrees to pay the deficiencies. Before commencement of construction of the minimum improvements in Phase 1, the Redeveloper shall plat the Redevelopment Property to coincide with the boundaries of the TIF District and in accordance with all City requirements. The Redeveloper and City agree to enter into a Developer's Agreement substantially similiar to that executed for the 1st Addition. All parties agree and understand that the Authority intends to acquire the 1400 West Broadway parcel (4th Addition) immediately adjacent to the City parcel (3rd Addition) and transfer the parcel to the City for use as public green space or park. If the acquisition and transfer occurs, the City agrees that such transfer will satisfy park dedication requirements under the City subdivision ordinance in connection with Phase 1 and Phase 2. Nothing herein shall be construed to require the Authority to acquire the 4th Addition parcel or the City to accept such parcel. Phna Within Phase 2, the 18t Addition and 3rd Addition, the Redeveloper agrees to construct ten twinhomo units and two 4•plex units in the 1st Addition, and four twinhome units and three triplex units in the 3rd Addition. The Authority agrees to purchase the 3rd Addition parcel (City -owned) subject to satisfaction of certain terms and conditions, convey the parcel to the Redeveloper for $1.00, and provide, pursuant to the Contract, financial assistance to the Redeveloper for purchase of the parcels within the 2nd Addition. The City agrees to convey the title to the Authority and the Authority agrees to acquire the title via a deed subject to certain terms and conditions. The purchase price to be paid to the City by the Authority is $40,000: $25,000 payable at closing and $15,000 pursuant to the terms of the non-interest note, Exhibit H. The Authority agrees to convey the title to the Redoveloper via a deed subject to certain terms and conditions. Date of closing, no later than , 1996. Council Agenda - 5128196 If TIF District No. 1-20 is not created by June 24, 1996, this agreement becomes null and void. The Authority agrees that the $25,000 payment to the City for the City parcel at closing shall be from non-restrictive Authority funds (HRA General Fund) with the intent to constitute the "qualifying local contribution" necessary to exempt TIF District No. 1-20 from local HACA Penalties. The Authority, Redeveloper, and County Assessor shall agree to the Assessment Agreement The Redeveloper shall provide evidence of one or more commitments for financing and evidence of insurance. The rights of the Authority with respect to receipt and application of any proceeds of insurance shall be subject and subordinate to the rights of any lender. The City Council approved a resolution calling for a public hearing date of June 24, 1996, for establishment of TIF District No. 1.20. Council also approved the overall concept plan for the redevelopment project known as Prairie West and accepted the parcel known as 1400 West Broadway. The Council declined the HRA's proposal relating to the City -owned property. The Council requested recovery of its out-of-pocket cleanup costs and requested the proposal be presented to the Board of Wright County. Lastly, the Council requested the developable area of she I400 West Broadway parcel be developed and the non -developable area be used as green space. Upon the Boardmembers of Wright County having received a letter from Administrator Wolfsteller relating to the proposal for conveyence of the City - owned parcel, County Commissioner Pat Sawatzke, Administrator Wolfsteller, and Koropchak met. According to an agreement between the City and the County, the County is entitled to $12,049.21 for outstanding taxes and other costs. Therefore, the value of the City -owned parcel is $45,000. The City has been reimbursed in the amount of $6,000 from the Petro Fund. Of the proposed $40,000 purchase price to be paid by the Authority, it was understood between Satwatzke, Wolfsteller, and Koropchak that the City will reimburse the County $12,049.21 from the $25,000 payment to the City from the Authority. Following approval of the Private Redevelopment Contract by all three parties, Administrator Wolfsteller will address the County Commissioners with a Lotter of Explanation and Intent. Additionally, utilization of the HRA non-restrictive Ponds constitutes the "Qualifying local contribution" to exempt Cho City from the HACA Penalty for TIF District No. 1.20. The property line between the City parcel and the 1400 West Broadway parcel is misleading, as the easterly row of pine trees and a part of the driveway of the 1400 West Broadway parcel actually lies within the City - owned parcel. This was determined through a survey of tho City -owned parcel. Therefore, the City -owned parcel is larger than it appears, and the Council Agenda - 6/28/86 developable area of the 1400 West Broadway parcel is reduced. Secondly, it is economically unfeasible for the Redeveloper to incur additional engineering and other costs for the purpose to perhaps construct one additional unit to the triplex unit located nearest the 1400 West Broadway parcel. B. kLTERNATIVE ACTION 1. A motion to adopt the resolution approving the Contract for Private Redevelopment among the HRA, the City, and Cedrus Creek Craftsman, Inc. 2. A motion to deny adoption of the resolution. 3. A motion to adopt the resolution with certain modifications to the Contract. 4. A motion to table any action. With the Council's May 13 approval of the overall concept plan for the Prairie West project and with staff addressing and resolving the concerns raised by Councilmembers, the Administrator, Assistant Administrator, and the HRA Executive Director recommend Alternative 01. The overall concept plan for the Prairie West project provides a uniform development of high-quality housing, complies with the Monticello Comprehensive Plan, increases the tax base, removes substandard or blighted structures, and provides land for use as public green space adjacent to the city pathway system. Copy of the resolution for adoption; Map identifying the let, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Additions. 20 CITY OF MONTICELLO RESOLUTION NO._ RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE. REDEVELOPMENT AMONG THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, THE CITY OF MONTICELLO AND CEDRUS CREEK CRAFTSMAN, INC. WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Monticello ("Authority") is administering Its Redevelopment Project No. 1 ("Project"); and WHEREAS, within the Project the Authority has proposed to create Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-20 (the "TIF District") In order to facilitate the development of a housing development by Cedrus Creek Craftsman, Inc. (the "Redeveloper"), known as the "Prairie West Project;" and WHEREAS, the City has reviewed a Contract for Private Redevelopment among the Authority, the City and the Redeveloper (the "Contract") specifying the respective obligations of the parties regarding the TIF District and the Prairie West Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that It is is the best interests of the City to enter into the Contract; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Monticello as follows: 1. The Contract Is hereby approved In substantially the form presented to the City Council on this date, subject to modifications that do not materially alter the nature of the transaction, which are approved by the Mayor and City Administrator; provided that execution of the documents by such officials shall be conclusive evidence of such approval. 2. Tho proper City officials aro authorized and directed to execute the Contract on behalf of the City, and to carry out on behalf of the City the City's obligations thereunder. 3. The proper City officials aro authorized to execute any deeds any related certificates or documents necessary to carry out the real estato transaction contemplated under the Contract, all subject to the terms and conditions of the Contract. Approved by tho City Council of tho City of Monticello this day of _ 1990. Mayor ATTEST: City Administrator a� 10190.5 w�/ 14t -.,EST BRGAUWAX, CITTI RPD..ADDITIO P's FA;;6LY.SITY PARCEL. DANYAT. t_Nn IIANAWALT PROPERTIES— PROPOSED I'l F *h I ';TR I CT NO, 1_ 20, 2ND ADDITION Po IST ADDITION ol %zl 44,V PRAIRIE WEST :oo- 11) 92 0 Council Agenda - 6/28/96 W.O. ) Council is asked to consider adopting the revised comprehensive plan, which represents the final step in the comprehensive plan update process. As you recall, at a special joint workshop with the Planning Commission and City Council in January, there was considerable discussion and input regarding the plan. A number of revisions were made to the plan subsequent to that discussion. These revisions were reviewed at a special meeting of the City Council; and subsequently, the City Council returned the document to the Planning Commission for final review via the public hearing process. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on April 2,19P96, and received comments from Charlie Pfeffer, who stated that there has been a tremendous effort put into this plan. He noted, however, that the main item that industry looks for in a community is a wide range of affordable housing. Pfeffer indicated his concern that the comprehensive plan was trying to micro -manage the housing market, which would affect industrial and commercial development. In addition to receiving input from Charlie Pfeffer, I reported to the Planning Commission that the Township supervisors had received the opportunity to review the plan in detail and that there were no objections to the plan coming from the Township Board at a recent meeting that I attended. Due to the fact that the Orderly Annexation Area Board had not had the opportunity to review the comprehensive plan prior to the public hearing, Planning Commission elected to keep the public hearing open through May to provide the OAA with a chance to review and comment on the plan. At the regular meeting of the OAA in April, the members provided a number of insightful comments, which were subsequently reviewed by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on May 7, 1996. A copy of the staff report to the Planning Commission regarding the MOAA comments is provided for your review. Support of the document by the MORA is critical to the success of the plan because much of the land area impacted by the plan is currently under the zoning jurisdiction of the MOAA. In order for the plan to be successful, the MOAA must follow the land use designations set forth. Due to the fact there was not a critical need to have the comprehensive plan adopted within a certain time frame, the Planning Commission elected to leave this item off the previous Council agenda due to the length of the previous meeting. No changes have been made to the plan since the City Council reviewed it last. Council Agenda - 6/28/96 B_ AI.TF.RNATIVF. ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt update to the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. This is the alternative recommended by the Planning Commission. Council should select this alternative if it believes that the comprehensive plan outlines the issues facing the community and properly identifies goals and direction for future land use and community development. Under this alternative, City staff will move forward by organizing the HRA, Parks Commission, and Planning Commission to develop a list of implementation steps or specific action items that will assist the City in moving toward accomplishment of the general goals outlined in the comprehensive plan. All three commissions will be preparing separate lists which will be reviewed together at an upcoming joint meeting of the commissions. Once this list is completed, it will be presented to City Council for review, comment, and adoption. In addition to completing this list of tasks, I plan on submitting the document again to the Monticello Orderly Annexation Area Board for formal adoption. Although the MOAA has voiced support of the comprehensive plan, they have not formally adopted it as the guidebook for development of the OAA. Perhaps it would be wise to obtain a formal motion from the MOAA accepting the comprehensive plan. Obtaining a formal motion from the Board will give the City some leverage in the future in the event there is a potential land use decision by the MOAA that might be at odds with the comprehensive plan. Finally, there aro a few typo's and adjustments to maps that need to be made to the final draft. None of the changes that need to be made are substantive in nature; therefore, staff is requesting that Council approve the document as it now exists. The pages that remain to be edited will be completed and sent to you for insertion into your comprehensive plan binder. 2. Motion to deny adoption of the update to the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. Council should select this alternative if there aro aspects of the plan that Council is no longer comfortable with. 22 Council Agenda - 5/28M C. STAFF F..0MMF.NnATION• Staff recommends adoption of the comprehensive plan, which represents the culmination of a huge effort by the City Planner, City staff, Planning Commission, City Council, and others that have provided input into this document. Although it took longer to get to this point than originally anticipated, I am proud that we were able to complete the plan during an 18 - month period where the city of Monticello witnessed by far the highest level of growth and activity ever experienced by the community. During this time, the City processed five new subdivisions, completed wastewater treatment planning, sanitary sewer system planning, numerous commercial and industrial projects, public works facility expansion, and completed the pathway. On the heels of this recent growth, the comprehensive plan update puts the City in position to answer many of the land use related questions that will be facing us as we prepare for the next wave of development that is likely to occur subsequent to completion of the wastewater treatment plant. It tells us that development to the south and to the east of the community is difficult to support financially and will not contribute greatly to the economic or social interests of the community; therefore, residential development is being encouraged to occur to the south and west. An area has been identified for industrial use. Identification of this area for this purpose has already blunted a number of residential developers that have come to city hall seeking sites for new residential plata. The armor of the comprehensive plan will help us continue to preserve areae in the OAA identified as industrial. Also, the comprehensive plan process identified the downtown as being a major area of concern, which ultimately helped to spawn the establishment of the Monticello Community Partners and the associated redevelopment planning funded by tho HRA and implemented by the MCP. Ultimately, the plan prepared by the MCP will be reviewed by the Planning Commission and will become a chapter of the comprehensive plan. Finally, work on the comprehensive plan does not stop here. The next stop is to determine specific steps that need to be taken in order to accomplish goals outlined in the plan. In the next few months prior to 1997 budget setting, the various commissions will be identifying specific actions that need to be taken to accomplish goals set forth in the comprehensive plan. It is our hope to continuously check decision-making against the City goals sot forth in the comprehensive plan with the hope of using the plan as a guide in moving the City in a consistent, positive direction. D. SUPPORTING DATA: Excerpts from recent Planning Commission meeting agendas. See your latest copy of the comprehensive plan. 23 Planning Commission Agenda - 5/7196 Wo I , Y: 1 I I , 1 10M : 7 I ' 0 / : . k1 1, 1, - i , I Y: 1 1 1 1111 I A RFFRRFNCE AND BACK •RO Nn: The Monticello Orderly Annexation Board (MOAN) reviewed the plan at their regular meeting on April 3, one day after the Planning Commission public hearing. The MOAA was generally very supportive of the plan. Pat Sawatzke in particular had very positive comments. County Planner Tom Salkowski also provided a written review of the plan for the OAA, which included a number of insightful comments. Please review his memo for more detail. As you will note, he does have a concern about an apparent inconsistency in our approach to shaping development. At the Planning Commission meeting on the 2nd, the Planning Commission approved the draft for forwarding to the City Council with the condition that the document be returned for additional review in the event the OAA Board had any major problems with the plan. At the MOAA meeting on the 3rd, there were no objections to the plan, but there were numerous useful comments that the Planning Commission may want to review before sending the final document to Council. Therefore, I am withholding placement of the item on the Council agenda until the Planning Commission reviews the MOAA comments on the draft document. Following is a summary of the comments made by the M®AA. The maps do net show a clear delineation between city and township boundaries. It was requested that the maps be updated if possible. Pat Sawatzke noted that the plan indicates that industrial and residential uses are planned for the NSP property after power plant decommissioning. Sawatzke suggested that a major portion of the site, especially areas along the river, should be earmarked for park use. Residential development should only be allowed along the binges of the park area. Industrial uses should be located on the opposite side of the freeway from the river. Sawatzke was supportive of continuing to establish strategies for encouraging homes with values equal to or higher than the H3ein Farms subdivision. Some of the ideas or strategies discussed include: Planning Commission Agenda - 5n196 Continue to maintain a city service connection fee structure that results in development paying its way. Develop and maintain quality schools and park system. Consider establishing larger house and lot size minimums. Motion to modify the draft document based on MOAA input and further Planning Commission discussion and authorize submittal of the comprehensive plan to the City Council. Motion to accept MOAA comments but make no changes to the plan. C. STAFF O F.NDATION: I recommend alternative q1. The MOAA was in support of the plan. Most of the points made by the MOAA are points of clarification and not objections to the plan. I recommend that the Planning Commission review the MORA comments and update the draft accordingly. Specifically, I think Tom Salkowski's comments regarding the apparent inconsistency in the stated role of the City in shaping development needs to be addressed. Also, the plan for future use of the NSP property should be discussed fiuther. Letter from Tom Salkowski. GL O JNTY � 2 I m a�o Zj �y 7856 April 1, 1996 0/(ice o/ PLANNING AND ZONING WRIGHT COUNTY COVERN.11ENT CENTER 10N. 3'. Second Street, Buffalo, J1N 55313.1193 1612) 682 -7398 To: Monticello Orderly Annexation Board From: Tom Salkowski Re: Comments on Monticello Comprehensive Plan Ory Staff at the County Office of Planning and Zoning have reviewed the City Plan in light of both County goals and policies and the Orderly Annexation Board's adopted plans. We would not presume to offer advice to the City on any internal matters, and in fact find, overall, that the City Plan coincides very well with County and Township plans. We believe that the consultants have taken a realistic and practical approach to planning for the City of Monticello, and congratulate the City for their efforts in this regard. The following comments are offered as food for thought in regard to certain sections of the Plan, and certainly not as any criticism of what we found to be a commendable effort. Goals and Policies chapter. page 5 The discussion under the policy "The City will monitor, but not pace, growth and development" seems to run counter to the thrust of much of the rest of the plan. We understand that this is a market economy, and any City has limited ability to "pace" development, but we must question the intent of the discussion beginning with "The marketplace is the moot efficient alloca for of new development..." It is possible that this paragraph will be thrown in the face of the City Council every time you try to control development in any way in the future. For example, if Monticello Township and Wright County took to heart the statement about the marketplace and had left development decinions to the "wisdom" of the market for the pant 15 years, then the entire township would probably be one -acre loco by now, and the Monticello City Plan would have far fewer optiono available. We believe that thio paragraph needo to be expanded and clarified to avoid leaving the wrong impreonion. A better explanation is found later, in the second paragraph of page Z of the Development Framework chapter: "..the City in committed to directing the physical location of the market-driven growth..." Pn-trd on ,n rlyd pa prr n / - EVual Oppa,ry-ur A//vmauvr Arno- EM010— =A --Clty Ca.P. Pl—. 0.7 DevVlopme til Framework chanter. Daces 3 & 4 It is not clear how the need for industrial land in the future is determined, other than "recent industrial land absorption". However, based on the lengthy discussion elsewhere in the plan on the need to attract commercial activity that will pay a living wage for residents of the City (building a sense of community), the figures for new industrial land in the future seem conservative. The plan proposes a new industrial area in the "southwest sector" which is dependent on the construction of a new freeway interchange, and this makes sense to us. However, since there has already been some residential growth in this area, and it seems unlikely that this freeway interchange will happen anytime soon, it is necessary to take action in cooperation with the Township or through the MOA, to preserve this area for this future use. Development Framework chapter. nacres 18-22 Clearly, the plans for the southern parts of the City are most important to the Township and MOA. We think that the consultant has done a very good job of spelling out the future, sensible direction of the City in this regard. The County P42 Office would like to emphasize the need to get services to the southwest quadrant, especially in light of the "threat to public health" declared by Cha Mn. PCA several years ago concerning the mobile home park sewer on the west side of Hwy 25. We understand that the City cannot be expected to fully finance the solution to the problem at the park. However, the Plan notes that this area will provide "the dominant portion of the next twenty year's growth" for the City. we hope that the need to solve the problem at the mobile home park may also give the City the opportunity to plan for service provision in this area. we agree wholeheartedly with the Plan's recommendation that the linear growth to the southeast needs to be curtailed in order to invest to the southwest. Among the numerous good reacono that the Plan lists to support this policy, we would add the severe stormwater runoff and drainage problems which already exist in the southeast sector. Page 20, paragraph 3 of the Development Framework otatee that "much of the (oouthweet) area is not within the current Orderly Annexation Area..." We disagree. The Plan fails to note the extenoive YMCA holdings in thio area, which are not likely to be available for development anyway, and can serve as a valuable open space buffer between the City and rural area of the Townohip. most of the area planned for future development in the Southwest io in the MOA, except for a omall area surrounded by YMCA land. 4P Planning Commission Agenda - 4/2/96 Puhlie IHenring..Consideration of a request to update the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. Applicant.Monti . llo Planning Commission and Monticello City ou nefl.. (J.O.) A. REF .RRNCR AND BACKGROUND: This agenda item represents what could be the final step for the Planning Commission in the process of updating the comprehensive plan. As you know, since February of 1995, the Planning Commission, with input from various individuals, city commissions and organizations, has been working toward an update of our comprehensive plan. The input came in the form of individual interviews with community leaders, neighborhood discussions, and through general discussion at Planning Commission, HRA, and City Council levels. Planning Commission should be pleased to know that the City Council spent considerable time reviewing the document which consisted of 2 separate work sessions. At a recent meeting, Council authorized submittal of the comprehensive plan to the public via the public hearing process. Steve Grittman and I reviewed the draft of the comprehensive plan at a recent township meeting and requested the township's comments. Based on the discussion, it appears that the townhip was comfortable with the comprehensive plan as prepared. I have not received any formal comments regarding the comprehensive plan from the township officials. Finally, at the regular meeting of the Monticello Orderly Annexation Board (MOAA), the group will be reviewing the comprehensive plan. This meeting falls on the day after the public hearing; therefore, any comments from the MOAA will go directly to the City Council. B. AI.TFRNATNE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt update to the Monticello Comprehensive Plan based on the finding that the comprehensive plan as prepared is consistent with the goals and policies supporting future development of the City of Monticello and authorize submittal of tho draft document to the City Council for review and consideration of adoption. Planning Commission mny wish to have this item brought back to the group if any members of the MOAA object to any aspect of the plan. The MOAA is made up of Pat Sawatzko, Franklin Dern, and Brad Fylo. Support of the plan by this group is very important to the long term implementotion of the comprehensive plan because this group qIr Planning Commission Agenda - 4/7196 makes zoning decisions in the township areas around the perimeter of the community. We want to make sure that the MOAA accepts the plans for land use so that we can be assured that zoning decisions will be consistent with the comprehensive plan. In the event, members of the MOAA object to land use patterns projected for the perimeter of the community, the item should probably brought back to the Planning Commission for further review. At this point in time, I do not suspect that the MORA will have any objections to the plan as prepared. However, we should probably leave our options open to review the document with the MOAA prior to submittal to City Council in the event there are conflicts. Motion to deny approval of update to the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. Motion to table approval of update to the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. Planning Commission may wish to table approval of the document until the input is received from the Orderly Annexation Board. If Planning Commission selects this alternative, then final adoption of the document would not occur until the May meeting of the Planning Commission. CSTAFF F..O MF.NDATION: Staff recommends alternative Nl with the condition as noted. I think it is important that the MOAA provides full support of the document prior to its submittal to the City Council. If the MOAA has concerns regarding the plan, then its membership should meet with the Planning Commission to discuss said issues. PLEASE BRING YOUR COPY OF THE COMPREHENSWE PLAN TO THE MEETING. V Council Agenda - 6/28/96 to. Consideration of painting the old downtown water tower. W.S. ) A. REFFRENCE AND BACKGROUND: The old downtown water tower is approximately 110 ft high, holds 60,000 gallons of water in the bowl and 20,000 gallons of water in the standpipe. The water tower is only used as a backup for the 800,000 gallon storage tank on the Monte Club Hill. When the new tank is taken for inspection and repairs, the old tank is used to provide pressure in the community. Since it is significantly lower than the new tank, however, the old tank provides 27 PSI less pressure in the community. The tank was built in 1940, and it is of a riveted design. Over the years, many of the rivets have began leaking and were ultimately welded over. For most of its life, the interior of the tank was waxed on an annual basis to keep the metal tree of corrosion. In 1989, however, we switched to an epoxy coating on the inside of the tank, as the wax coating is difficult to maintain when a tank is used infrequently. The exterior of the tank has not been painted or touched up since 1989 and is due. In addition, some minor railing repair on top of the tank is necessary. The City Council should decide whether or not they wish to repaint the tank the same aluminum color with a red roof and black lettering, or if they wish to go to some type of color or two-tone appearance. To re -do the silver and red roof would probably cost $10,000 or less. To redo the tower in a color could cost between $20,000 to $26,000. It is expected that the tank will remain in periodic service for at least the next decade. Sometime in the thture, 6 or 10 years down the road, we will be adding well capacity and, more than likely, another elevated tank in the western portion of the community. At that time, the tank may be able to be taken permanently out of service or still left as a landmark. W AI.TFRNATIVF. ACTIONS: The first alternative is to authorize City staff to obtain quotes for painting the anter tower silver with a red roof and black lettering, and to have the firm with the lowest quote, estimated at less than $10,000, to complete the work this year. 24 Council Agenda - 5/28/86 The second alternative would be to obtain quotes for painting the tower with the colors selected by the City Council and proceed with the work this year as long as the lowest quote is less than $25,000. The third alternative would be to do nothing at this time. The life of a repaint using the aluminum color has a life expectancy of 5 to 7 years. The life expectancy of a good color paint job could last a decade. C. STAFF RErOMMENTIATION; It is the recommendation of the Public Works Director and Water Superintendent that the water tower be painted this year based upon alternative #1 or alternative #2 (which both include the railing repair). There are sufficient funds to do either alternative in the original Water System Improvement Bond Fund. D_ SUPPORTING DATA; Colored brochures of various water tower painting schemes will be provided `- at Tuesday evening's meeting. We do not have enough available copies to send to all Council members. 25 Council Agenda - 5/28/96 During the discussion of the Feasibility Report for the Dundas Road/Fallon Avenue project, the City Council deleted the water main looping on Fallon Avenue. The primary reasons for deletion were the estimated cost of $27,000 and the fact that the City would have to pick up the looping cost, as there was no immediate benefit to adjoining properties. After reviewing the bids on the project, the City Engineer has determined that the actual construction cost, including indirect (engineering, inspection and bond) costs. would be approximately $19,124, which is almost 30% lower than the Feasibility Report indicated. Consequently, the City Engineer requests that you again consider the looping at this time rather than wait until the road surface on Fallon Avenue is improved in the future. The first alternative is to approve Change Order 01 for project q98 - OIC, adding 654 ft of 12 -inch water main to Fallon Avenue for looping purposes at an estimated construction cost of $14,618.80. The second alternative would be not to extend the looping at this time but have it completed with the rebuilding of Fallon Avenue sometime in the future. C. STAFF RECO MF.NDATION: It is the recommendation of the City Engineer that Council approve the Change Order to loop the water main on Fallon Avenue as outlined in alternative A1. We can use funds from the Water Improvement Bond Fund. Dl SUPPORTING DATA: Copy of letter Gram Bret Weiss dated May 21, 1998. 26 may -ea -yo U4:CbY -U &Associates, Inc. May 21, 1996 Mr. Rick Wolfsteller City of Monticello P.O. Box 1147 Monticello, MN 55362 350 Westwood Lake Office 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55428 612-541.4800 FAX 541-1700 Re: Projected Watermain Oversizing Dundas Road/Fallon Avenue City of Monticello Project No. 96 -OIC WSB Project No. 1022.00 Dear Mr. Wolfsteller: SA Mhulma&. P.E. am A Win. P.E Pntr Il 1tWak Mn& M Dan4d W. hnm. P.E Mold B. Bay. P.E This letter is in reference to your recent inquiry regarding the projected oversizing costs for the above - noted project. As was identified in the feasibility report, approximately 654 lineal feet of watermain construction located along Fallon Avenue will be constructed to a 12" diameter, which is slightly in excess of the 10" diameter requirement for industrial/commercial areas. As such, we have evaluated the differences in the pipe costs and other appurtenances using the actual unit prices from the construction bid. 77:3t cost was determined to be 51,1 33.65, or spread over the 654 fat, would amount to SI.73 per lineal foot. As is our policy, the City does not pay for indirect costs associated with the oversizing. In a related matter, this project originally included the installation of a 12" watermain to Chelsea Road to complete a critical loop in the watermain system. However, due to cost concerns this was eliminated from the project. In our feasibility report we had identified a cost of approximately $30.00 per lineal foot for that installation and we received a price of 522.20 per lineal foot in actual construction cost. It would be my recommendation that we pursue the installation of the remainder of the 12" watermain at this time in lieu of waiting for a couple of years when Fallon Avenue is reconstructed. The Fallon Avenue project won't have much utility installation identified and may result in higher watermain costs. For your information, the cost to complete the watermain is projected to be 119,124. The total would involve a savings of approximately 58.000 from the feasibility report. Please let me know if we should tape this to the Council at the next meeting as a change order, or if you prefer to leave the project as proposed by the City Council. Please give me a call at 5414800 to discuss these issues. Sincerely, WSB A Assoelar 1,G 15a Bret A. Wells, P.E. Vice President c: Jeff O'Neill, City of Monticello John Simola, City of Monticello lmtrardsnr • E►gieent - Planners I' rquurrrosturin anovu „"" "" •• Council Agenda - 5/28/96 �1 1 1 1 17-14117 A. RF.F . F.N .. AND BA .KGRO tNn: As you will recall, the City Council met in a brief workshop prior to the last Council meeting to review the Highway 25/Chelsea Road Corridor Study and possible alternatives for realigning a new intersection off of Oakwood Drive to Highway 25. This study was originally authorized in anticipation of improvements that would be done to Highway 25 south of I.94 that would widen this corridor into possibly three or four lanes of traffic and would likely result in a partial closure of traffic movements at the present Oakwood Drive and Highway 25 intersection. MN/DOT is aware of the problems that motorists are experiencing at this intersection with its close proximity to the on and off ramps of 1-94. It is assumed that as traffic increases in the future, the problems will become more complex. I was recently contacted by Mr. Gary Dirlam, District Traffic Engineer for MN/DOT, who inquired as to whether the City of Monticello would be interested in using our consultant engineer to continue with preliminary design, final design, and the balance of the engineering work necessary for the proposed improvements, including widening of Highway 25 from I.94 to past Kjellbergs, Inc. Due to MN/DOT'a volume of work and lack of personnel, Mr, Dirlam indicated that MN/DOT would allow the City to not only use our consultant to prepare the design documents, but also they are asking the City to do the entire project, including construction management, inspection activities, right-of-way acquisition legwork, and to be responsible for holding all informational and public hearings necessary for this improvement. Normally, this is not the typical approach that has been used by MN/DOT in the past; but they are indicating that if this project is to be done in a reasonable amount of time, this would be the best way to approach it. Otherwise it could take three or four years before construction would occur. At this point, MN/DOT is estimating that the project could be bid as early as February 1997 for construction next year. Details that would need to be addressed include entering into a Cooperative agreement with MN/DOT that would spell out the exact role of each party and the participation and cost allocation that would be expected ilrom all parties. If the agreement can adequately assure that the City is not going to be responsible for any engineering or other costs that do not benefit us 27 Council Agenda - 5/28196 directly but rather are for the Highway 25 improvement, there may not be any disadvantage to proceeding with their request. Certainly, from a timing standpoint, the City would likely see the improvements accomplished a lot earlier than if MN/DOT handled the entire project; but we do need to be assured that we are not going to incur additional cost because of it. It is assumed that the work we have done so far in reviewing alternatives for potential new realignments of Oakwood Drive and Highway 25 would not be funded or reimbursed by MN/DOT. We may want to have a separate understanding with our consultant engineer regarding the amount of additional work we should be doing regarding the Chelsea Road realignment proposal until we get all the details ironed out with MN/DOT on the cost- sharing arrangement. Initially, I had some concerns as to why MN/DOT was proposing this type of arrangement where not only do they let us do the preliminary and final design work but also control all construction management and inspection activities. Since it's possible this project could have some negative comments from adjoining property owners, I had concerns that possibly the City would be exposed to additional liability if we managed the entire project; but I do think the issue of limiting access at the present Oakwood Drive intersection with Highway 25 is a MN/DOT decision, and it would be hard to place any blame on the City simply because we are managing the project for the State. 13. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS; Authorize the consulting engineer to prepare a proposal for design and construction management of the proposed Highway 25 improvement project for MN/DOT. Under this alternative, the City would also be willing to enter into a cooperative agreement with MN/DOT that will eventually indicate the City would be the entity managing the overall project for the State. Do not agree to enter into a cooperative agreement. While this request may seem a little unusual in the amount of control MN/DOT is proposing to be given to the City on this project, it would certainly appear that the improvements would be completed much earlier than if MN/DOT was to manage the entire process from beginning to end. It 28 Council Agenda - 5/28/96 is estimated from MN/DOT that it would take three to five years more to complete the project if they do all of the design work, right-of-way acquisition, and include it in their construction scheduling process. Assuming we can enter into an agreement with both MN/DOT and our consulting engineer that assures the City would not be liable for any additional cost or engineering fees that are not directly related to City benefit, there appears to be no reason not to pursue this alternative. While the City will incur engineering costa upfront, the State, afar the bids are let, would pay to the City the entire project cost, which we could invest until we are making payments to the contractors. This should allow us to recapture some of our interest cost we may have lost on the engineering fees being paid ahead of time. Copy of letter from MN/DOT. 29 s MAY 22 '96 1347 MMT BRADOM Mirmemots Daparbmd Distrkt 9 s 1991 Industrial Park Road Bauer. MN 58401 May n, 1996 Mr. Rick Walfittela City Adtinia reW P.O. Box 1147 Mondccllo, MN $5362-9245 Deer Mr. Wolawlet P.1 Tel; 218/82B-2460 Far. 2181828-2210 Top Free; U800165 -M CQRREEMON R& S.P. 8605-40 MFM 2$) South of C.R. 117 to kt 1.94 February 1997 kabig- $1,7$0.000 District 3 has sehedi the above pojett within your eommundy. Due to limited district reamom we ate aaimrg your assistance to keep 6b pmjat m scbc6, We we iegming as to the City's willingnets to miasge a cotudteat to deliver the Preliminary Design, Final Design TmMc, Maros, Surveys, Canstmd and Rk&-of-Wey Amctiooaloetivities for this project. The Stats would teirtbumo the city for the cans dm costs afta reompt of a fully a macd cooperative agroarcm. (Ibis s after pleas aro ready for lcWW. A acparate right of way agteemmt would be papared TWs would be courdinated with Mr. Calvin mbrem Land Management FAV—. Tbc State provides the dry wah the firl State paoapabm ads a fitly m=ud agea meat and rt mviog ® invoice from the Stam Thus, while rho city is "carrying" the Stam for comuhaat costs up to coaum tiaa, tho City will have the cons nwdm dollen for making poymmu to the contractor. Such psymmts atc as a gramuud bats as the cmtraera oumplacs the work. Thcmfom we feel the city should mcoup itshandling vests for the ptgject development eoltattmot We would request the ctty to have its smashing cogiooet prepote a scope of service and fee propend for the project. The district wmW review and aommmt to rho toy. Mr. Doan Shcsttrl, Prdmumy Design Fat = and Mr. Bab Buteb. Final Deaigte Eqmct will be cootats with respect to aoesultaot's proposal. We appreciate the dty's wiliogoess to num us in acbwvws our Son! of improving rho quality of tMb for rcudents of Mmticdlo and travatme an T.H. 25. Sincerely. Gary P. Dbtmn District Traffic Engirm a: Dave Solved - St Clad Bob Busch - Baxter ' N.Krauta- Busts Mswo opporutity wnmw /Z 4 EIRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 04/15/96 13:.47':58. Disbursement Journal (LRRANT AMOUNT Cl DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION GENERAL CHECKING 40302 04/15/96 MN POLLUTION CONTROL 127 PERMIT/80HAN ON FARM 85.,00 40303 04/15/96 GOVERNMENT TRAINING 72 REG FEE/RICK W 160.00 ' 40304 04/15/96 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 118 WATER/SNOW/ATV REG 846.00 40305 04/1S/96 U.S. POSTMASTER 210 POSTAGE/RECVCLING LET 482.09 40306 04/15/96 MONTICELLO TIMES 140 TIMES SUBSCRIPTION 29.00 40307 04/15/96 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LSF 174 INS PREMIUM/EIHELLMAN 117.98 40308 04/15/96 MN STATE TREASURER 262 STATE SLOG PERMIT C 1,47G.31 40309 04/15/96 A T 8 T INFO SYSTEMS 15 FIRE PHONE CHARGES 39.90 40310 04/15/96 CLARK FOOD SERVICE, 997 CITY HALL SUPPLIES 201:,23 4(1311 04/15/96 COPY OUPLCATING PROD 41 LIBRARY COPY MCH MTC 78.07 0 4031.,2 04/1,5/96 DOUBLE 0 ELECTRIC 806 KRAMER RENTAL REPAIRS 07.00 40,313 04/15/90 EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOF 51 SOFTWARE/C HALL COMPUT 53.90 40314 04/1G/96 HOGLUND COACH LINES 403 HEARTLAND EXPRESS P 4,020.03 40315 04/15/96 MARCO BUSINESS PRODU 100 TONER/P WORKS COPY MC 106.50 40310 04/15'/96 MN COUNTIES INSURANC 059 DRUG TESTING/JOHN 0 40.00 40:)17 04/15/90 MONrICELLO TIMF3 140 AO/DOWNTOWN REOLVELOP 139.20 h0910 04/15/96 NORTHERN STATES POWE 140 UTILITIES 90124 4031+) 04/19/9,0 O'NCILL/J,LFF 161 MILEAGE EXPUNGE RLIMB 104.34 40020 04/15/90 ONE CALL CONCEPT;, I 036 PROF GERVICEO/WATER 62.00 44.121 04/15/90 RELIABLE CORPORATION 179 COMPUi'FR S(W PLYr.,I/C H ?40.IR 405?1 DG/15/96 REIIADLF CORPORATION 179 CDMPUTLR PAPER/C HALL 04.90 407?1 04/113/9G RELIA01 C CORPORATION 179 0F4'ICk 3UPPL.TC13/C HAIJ !1.10 )74.24 a('I 4(J?-) U4/11i/96 RUFF AUTO PAGTh 260 RUM111:9 9CPAiW/,1(',HN9 1) 117.11, 4074'- 04/15/96 (,HUMAN/(ATHV 101 TRAVEL RFIM0/WM11 CLAD 10.00 41)3'4 Ob/1',/'Ib TAB FIWDllCI!, CO. C71 OFFICI' 50PPI ICS/C HALL 74.1)0 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 04/1-5/90 13 :4'7 :58 l RRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 40325 04/15/96 TDS TELECOM 40326 04/15/96 TOS TELECOM 40325 04/15/08 TDS TELECOM 4032 04/15/98 TDS TELECOM 40325 04/15/96 TDS TELECOM 40325 04/15/96 TOS TELECOM 403'25 04/15/96 TDS TELECOM 40325 04/'15/96 TDS TELECOM 40325 04/15/96 TOS TELECOM 40325 04/15/96 TDS TELECOM 40325 04/15/96 TDS TELECOM 40326 04/15/96 U.S. POSTMASTER 40327 04/15/98 VIKING COCA COLA 40328 04/15/96 WOLFSTELLER/RICHARD 40329 04/15/98 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO 40329 04/15/96 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO �40329 04/15/96 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITA b0?a 04/15/96 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO 40329 04/15/96 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO 403?0 04/15/96 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO GENERAL CHECKING Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CL 953 TELEPHONE CHARGES 345.49 953 TELEPHONE CHARGES 76.75 953 TELEPHONE CHARGES 147.ty'2 953 TELEPHONE CHARGES 131.11 953 TELEPHONE CHARGES 50.00 853 TELEPHONE CHARGES 59.74 953 TELEPHONE CHARGES 112.48 953 TELEPHONE CHARGES 56.48 953 TELEPHONE CHARGES 59.74 953 TELEPHONE CHARGES 071.97 953 TELEPHONE CHARGES 118.37 2,035.55 *CF 210 MAIL BOX RENTAL FEE 35.00 779 POP/CITY HALL. 01.13 717 LUNCH REIMS/MTG 21.67 219 TAXES/ZOHANON FARM 962.02 219 TAXESIKRAMER RENTAL 1,589.5.1 219 TAXL'S/WWTP 421.30 219 TAXES/ELDLRL'Y PROP 44.97 219 WASTE CERVICE CHG/FIRE 40.00 ?19 WASTER SERVICE CHARGE 406.00 3,497.70 °CI TOTAL 1&,07$.50 0 ,BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 04/24/96 11 :12:49 Disbursement Journal [ `.ARRANT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Cl DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING '39835 04/23/96 KRA, E_MER/WANDA 35A CORRECT CODING 28.9.1CR 39835 04/23/96 KRAEME'R/WAN6A 35s CORRECT CODING 28.91 0.,00 *C1 401'42 04/-23/96 GREG TURKULA .90429 CORRECT CODING 4.55CR 401'4.2 04/23/96 GREG TURKULA x90429 'CORRECT CODING 4.55 0.00 ►C[ 40330 04/23/96 MN DEPARTMENT OF HEA 23:5 IST QTR WATER CONN 2,335.60 403,31 04/23/96 MN DEPART OF REVENUE 11 ID SALES TAX ADJ 0.17 40331 04/23./96 MN.OEPART OF REVENUE 119 SALES TAX 19.94 40331 04/23/96 MN DEPART OF REVENUE 119 SALES TAX/WATER 7.45.89 766.00 *C1 40332 04/23/98 EISE'LE/JIM 880 RETM9/GLASSES 50.00 40333 04/23/98 WASHBURN/THERES,A 886 FEES/DOWNTOWN REDEVEL 700.00 40334 04/23/96 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 110 WATER/SNOW/ATV REG 910.00 0 0335 04/23/98 U.S. POSTMASTER 210 POSTAGE/SEWER 8 WATER 166,.,7.9 0335 04/23/90 U.S. POSTMASTER 210 POSTAGE/SEWER & WATER 165.78 331.59 •GI1 40336 04/23/86 MELEEN/JERRY .90430 UNDERCOATING/PW PICKU '250.00 4:0337 04/23/90 TDS TELECOM 993 TELEPHONE CHG/LIBRARY 69.31 40338 04/23/96 JACOFISON/DIANE 9? REIMS/OFFICE SUPPLIES 40.09 40939 04/2.3/96 PROAA CROP CONGULTA 1036 PROF 9F.RV/BOHANON F 1,075.00 40340 04/29/96 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 110 WATER/VNOH/ATV REG 207..00 40341 04/26/96 ARAMARK 04 0 CITY HALL 3UPPLIE5 37.00 4OD42 04/26/00 FSRAUN INTERTEC CORPO 630 ENG FEE/WWTP EXPAN 13,776.60 4034a 04/26/06 0VNTRAL MINN INITIAT 83 ? CMIF GRANT PAYMENT 1,400.21 40J44 04/26/96 COMPUTER PARTG A .SER 600 COMPUTER MTC AGREFMEN 264.00 40344 04/20/06 COMPUTFR WAkT3 0 SER 30 13 COMPUTER CAOLE/C HALL 74.59; 330.55 *C1 40345 04/2G/90 EHLI.RS 8 AO:,nL,INC P 03.3 PROF OP RV/HkA 1,580.70 ,0J4G 04/20/00 FFO EX 904 PO.TAGE/RECYCLING SCAN 30.25 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 04/24/96 14 :22':'49 {(,ARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 40347 04/26/86 HDR ENGINEERING', INC 40348 04/26/96 HERMES/JERRY 40349 04/26/96 JOHN C'FARRELL 40350 04/26/96 KENNEDY & GRAVEN 40350 04/26/96 KENNEDY & GRAVEN 40350 04/26/96 KENNEDY & GRAVEN 1.0351 04/26/96 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 40352 04/26/96 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE 40353 04/26/96 MN DEPART OF TRANSPO 40354 04/26/96 MN SURPLUS & OUTFITT 40355 04/20/96 MN U.C. FUND 0356 04/26/96 MOBIL 40356 04/26/98 MOBIL 40357 04/26/96 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO 40358 04/.26/90 MONTICELLO SENIOR 01 40350 04/26/98 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONS 40859 04/26/96 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONS 40359 04/20/90 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONS 40360 04/26/90 PAUL A WALDRON 6 ASS 40361 04/26/90 PLUMDERY-PURCELL'S P 40362 04/26/96 SHUMAN/CATHY 40303 04/20/90 SIMOLA/JOHN E. 40304 04/20/06 9IMPGON/CYNTHIA 409U5 04/26/96 -,TAR TRIBUNE 1,0366 04/26/00 TAYLOR LAND GURVEVOR Disbursement Journal DESCR'I'PTION AMOUNT Cl 944 ENG FEES/WWTP EXP,A 74_,443.17 81 LIBRARY CLEANING CONT 227.50 .90437 APPRAISAL/KATZMAREK P 350.00 939 LEGAL FEES/KAT2MAREK 819.75 939 LEGAL FEE/FLUTH PROPER 99.50 939 LEGAL FEES/DOWNTWN DE 890.25 1,709.50 243 INS PREM/FIRE DEPT TR 174.00 709 EQUIP PARTS/SNOW & ICE 59.40 538 DECALS/STREETS 20..00 107,0 COVERALLS/,BLD INSPECTO 62.95 130 UCBENEFITS/T KICKHAF 328.;22 131 OAS/STREET DEPT 26.20 131 GAS/WATER OEPT 28.:20 5?:40 185 ANIMAL CONTROL CONT 1,120.70 139 MONTHLY CONTRACT PY 2.,833.33 550 PROF SERV/COMP PLAN 3,613.53 550 PROF SERV/DOWNTOWN DE ,150,.00 550 MISC PROF SERV/PLAN 1,224.17 4,987.76 830 OLD INSPECTOR FEES 2,915.00 251 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/WA 111.00 191 REIMD/MkALG/SEMINAR 12.00 900 LUNCH REIMD/WWTP MTG 60.71 909 FIRE HALL CLEANING 50.00 197 NEWUPAPER S:UIIGCRIPTION 24.06 103 4URVFY FEES/60HANON F 0?5.0U wc) *G1 *Ct ORC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 04/24/96 11 :22:49 ARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 40387 04/26/96 U-.S. POSTMASTER 40369 04/26/98 VIKING COCA COLA 40369 04/26/96 WATERPRO SUPPLIES CO 40370 04/26/96 WEST PUBLISHING COMP 40371 04/26/96 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO GENERAL CHECKING 6 l7 Di-sbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CL 2.10 CITY HALL ROST'AGE 1 ,500,.00 779 POP/CITY HALL 87.33 670 WATER METERS/WATER 1,901.11 250 96 MN. LAW BOOKS/C HA 146.44 219 SCERG GRANT PAYMENT 2,760.51 TOTAL 1,21 ,983•.92 6 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 04/3.0/96 15:03:41 WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 40372 04/30/96 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA 40373 04/3,0/96 MIODENDORF/JOHN 40374 04/30/96 NARVESON/ROBERT 40375 04/30/96 ADMIRED PROPERTIES 40375 04/30/96 ADMIRED PROPERTIES' 40376 04/30/96 U.S. POSTMASTER 40377 04/30/96 U.S. POSTMASTER GENERAL CHECKING Di-sbursement Journal, DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 96 REG FEE/RICK W 15.00 909 REIMS/SEMINAR TRAVEL 162.64 .90439 REFUND/OVERPVMT/SEW& WA 1.34 .90372 REFUND/OVERPYMT/SEW& W 10.00 .90372 REFUND/OVERPYMT./SEW& W 70.80 30.80 710 POSTAGE/PUBLIC WORKS 39.00 210 POSTAGE/DEP REGISTRAR 304.00 TOTAL 557.70 I 6RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM ry-0,5/06/96 11:35:48 ]ARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 46378 05/06/-96 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 40375 05/06/96 FLUTH/BARBARA A 40380 05/06/96 AMERICAN PAGING OF M 4,0360 015/06/96 AMERICAN PAGING OF M 40300 05,/06/96 AMERICAN PAGING OF M 41U380 05/06/96 AMERICAN PAGING OF M 40380 05/06/96 AMERICAN PAGING OF M 40390 05/06/86 AMERICAN PAGING OF M 40380 05/,06/96 AMERICAN PAGING OF M 40300 06/00/96 AMERICAN PAGING OF M 40301 05/06/98 AUDIO COMMUNIC Al'IONS 405;2 05/06/80 BONINE EXCAVATING 40303 05/06/96 CEI.LULAR 2000 OF 5T 40383 05/06/06 CELLULAR 2060 OF IT 40)03 05/06/90 CELLULAR 2000 OF ST 0308 05/06/96 CELLULAR 2000 OF $T 40304 05/06/06 CRAGUN'£ RONFE RrNCE 40335 05/06/96 0 8 K RFFUSE RECYCLI 40306 05/06/06 ENGINEERING .REPRO 'SY 40307 05/00/96.ERNIE13 BAIT '.3HOP 401100 05/00/90 FEEDRIIE CONTT20LS, 1 40:00 05/06/06 FEF.ORITE CQNTf2015, I 4t)i00 03/00/ -OG FrkRELLGA3 40JU0 0.,/06/ffG bAk7NER"G OWI CE FRO 40):10 05/06/06 GARTNI'R'G +SFr:mi! PRO 40:f10 UG/06/00 0ARTNLR'G OFFICE PRU 40601 (i`_/O6/OG GOVCkNP'ENT TRAINING 40302 0'>/00/DU NAUWY't AUTO ''UPPLY hU ;'12 00/OG/00 HAf RY'F- A(1'iC) J(PP( Y h0 )72 U'i/UU/'N, liARkY',' AUTO "IIVI 4 Y 0:•/06/16 IIANrV'f. AUTII 'JIIPPLY 40)7" U')/00/9I) 11AI:kV'„ A00 ':11VPIV Disb ursonent Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT C 118 MATER/SNOW/ATV REG 1,389.00 1046 PURCHASE PROP/ WEST 1.000.00 951 PAGER CHARGES 23.:23 951 PAGER CHARGES 32.05 951 PAGER CHARGES 11.64 951 PAGER CHARGES 11.64 951 PAGER CHARGES 11.£4 851 PAGE48 CHARGES 11.G4 951 PAGER CHARGES 11.64 951 PAGER CHARGES 1'1.04 125.17 17 RAI00 REPAIRS/C HALL 52.50 924 CONST COSTS/S WEST /5,716.36 794 CAR PHONE CHARGES 26.2 794 CAR PHONE CHARGES On 61 704 CAR PHONE CHARGES? 8.21 794 CAR PHONE CHARGES 10.70 45.,90 41 TRAVEL EXPENSE/CONE' 2G4.72 6.11 Rr1:.YCLING CONTRACT/ 3.+108.10 1098 MAPS/Pt.AN & ZON 13.00 984 13CALE/TOM 801;(:/PW INGP 3U.90 56 PROF SERV/WATER DEPT 115.UD 50 CKEMICAWWAT(IR DEP 2,134.24 2,039.24 A11 :,UfPLiF:1)/GTRti.;T� 302.Od 977 OF F F.Upro t "'/ F' 110RUG 10.'? 971 OFFICE GUPPLIs;VC (IAL 11;1.19 971 P0'1AGE/RETUktJ PKG/WATI. 0.(,5 191J . U+3 7? I,LG FCL/JFFF C,NEILI 1(:0.(30 70 MI .r ;11PPLIF.�/5TR1'CT� 4.')') 70 VEN WC:'AIR PA T!/GT4EE ^2."4 70 f19UIP ttLPAtR ?AR19/"1111' 1.31 70 VfH kIPAIR VA%1-/VATEf, 14. i+ cC 'x C c�- NI ESRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 65/06/96 11:35:68 cvARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 40393 05/06/96 HOGLUND 203 COMPANY 40394 0$/06/88 HOGLUND COACH LINES 40395 05/06/96 J M OIL COMPANY 40895 05/06/96 J M OIL COMPANY 4079G 05/06/96 JIM HATCH SALES CO 40397 05/06/96 K MART STORE 40396 05/06/96 KEN ANDERSON TRUCKIN 40309 05/06/'98 KOROPCHAK/OLIVE 40400 05/06/96 LKM CLEANING 40400 05/06/96 LKM CLEANING 40401 05/06/06 MARCO BUSINES5 PROOU 40402 OL/OG/96 MARTIEIS FARM SERVIC 60402 05/06/88 MARTIE'S FARM JENVIC 40403 05/00/06 MIODF:NDORF/.JBHN C, 0404 06/06/.36 MONTICCLLO OFHICk PR 40404 0!i/06/30 MONTIChl-LO OFFICc PR 4,0t, 04 09/00/36 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR 40494 05/00/06 MONTICCLLO OFFICP PR 40404 08/06/96 MONTICELLO OFFICE PR- frt)404 Ori/6G/913 MONTICLLLO U4: FIC f: PR 404(14 05/06/06 MUNI ICELLU OFFICE PR 40404 0'-)/06/9G PIDNTICCLLU 0Vt'TP,F. Pk 50604 05/OG/9G rONY2('E L LO OFF Il•.F PR 40404 09/06/06 M0NTICI:1 LO OF FICC. Vk 60004 01,/06/9G MONTICEILD OFFICE Ph 40406 0!)/OG/9U MON'(IF;EI,LO OI-FICF: PJl 401!;04 05/00/96 MONTICELFO OFFI('t Pk Di.sb'ursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT C 51.79 82 VEH REPAIR PARTS/3TREE 27.13 483 HEARTLAND EXPRESS C 5,537:58 95 GAS/FIRE DEPT 9.51 95 ADDITIVES''/STPEET DEPT 234.28 243.79 963 CONES/VESTS/BATTERIES 699.90 460 CITY HALL CLEANING SUP 17.15 697 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVIC 106.50 97 MILEAGE REIMS 33.72 990 DEP REG OFFICE CIEANI 308.05 930 P WORKS FILO CLEANING 2GG.25 575.in 106 TYPEWRITER MTC/CITY H 250.00 107 SEED/PARKS 11.05 101 5FED/5TRELT DEPT 50:05 62.00 909 TRAVEL REIMO/OEMINAR 36.00 IDG SUPPLIES/JUNK AMNESTY 63.19 06 OI -F '3UPPLIEVP WOR%% 850.23 iDG OFF (JUPPLIE5/CITY HAL 502.00 136 COPY PAPER/QTTY HALM. 106.50 136 COPY PAPER/LIBRARY 164.12 139 CHAI&3/I,IEIRARY 270.)"1 1�0 OFFICE OUPPLICS/LI RA 110.73 1�U VORRiCT CC50INU 391.IotT 1 36 CORrULLT (UDlk, iJ1.10 QG >IIPPtIEi/PATHWAY 6f)l:Ni 13.G1 1JG OFFICE 1UPP1IE'',/FIRE 0 01-76 106 FIL1: CAOINCT/P WOkK . 2:?0..O1, 1 A LUPPLIE_/NFW WWTP 4U',i1S 05/60/00 MOON MO,Ott GAIEL. IN 162 PART:/PARKO DIP' U.'):J 404-+(, 01,/tAi/96 NATXONA1 1)11;14046 0AIJ 144 ')NPI'! TI: )/,;1NL1 U`.,/fIG/fIG NATI('tJAL F.J1,H7tFi 1Ak 144 VFNI(lf F'ART'-VTk'(FT,. 71').47 hi14U4 0'i/ 3G/^U NATEONA1 1' 11 ;131, 0A!y 144 F:013IP FI PAIR 1'A:l!;/''rk7 i-0) ) a C' ac t( aC +r' BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 05/06/9.6 11:35:48 Cl " LJARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 40408 05/0,6/96 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR 40406 05/66/96 NATIONAL 6U$HING PAR 40406 05/06/96 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR 4.0408 05/06/96 NATIONAL BUSHING. PAR 40406 05/06/96 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR 40406 05/06/86 NATIONAL BUSHING PAR 40407 05/06/96 NORTHERN STATES PONE 40407 05/06/96 NORTHERN STATES POWE 40407 05/06/96 NORTHERN STATES POWE 404,07 05/06/96 NORTHERN STATES POWE 40407 05/06/06 NORTHERN STATES PORE 40407 05/06/96 NORTHERN STATES POWE 40407 05/06/96 NORTHERN STATES POWF 40407 05/06/96 NORTHERN STATES POWE 40407 05/06/96 NORTHERN 51ATE0 PORE 40407 05/06,106 NORTHERN STATES POWE 40408 05/06/96 PETERSEN'S MONT FORD 40408 05/06/96 PETERSEN'S MONT FORD 40409 05/08/90 PLUMrERY-PI1RCF-LL'S P 40409 05/06/90 PLUMIISERV,PURCELL'G P 40410 05/06/90 ROYAL TIRE OF MONTIC 40411 06/00/90 5AFLTY-KLEEN CORP. 40412 O5/0G/)G SIMOi4SON LU14DER COMP 4040 05/00/9U t3IMUN00N LUMPIER COMP 4U413 05/00/90 SPUCTRUM JUPPLY C'). 40414 05/0G/96 f.T.(,LiAJV FIRE COUIF'M 4(141') 05/00/')G U I INK 405,1`, OVOO/OG U !, I IF4K 4041') tj`,/00/1)0 11 3 1.INU 4041[. Ub/UG/OG 11 G t IHtt U t ttitt Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT C 144 TOOLS/SHOP & GAR 5.45 144 OLD MTC SUPPLIES/PARKS .26.55 144 VEH REPAIR PARTS/SEWER 7.48 144 VEH REPAIR FARTS/FIRE 174.45 144 VEHICLE REPAIR/FIRE 3.20 144 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/PAR 41.81 882. IS 148 UTI LITIEO 2,967.03 148 UTI LITIES 302.27 148 UTI LITIES 691.75 148 UTI LITIEU 86.77') 1,48 UTI.LITIE9 79'3.17 148 UTILITIES 14.27 148 UTILITIES 601.97 148 UTILITIES 243.76 14'Q UTI LITI£ 3 84 7. b3 140 UTLITIES 1,288.42 7,982.79 165 VE. . REPAIR PARTS/STRE 102.21 165 VEH REPAIR PARTS/SEWE 446.39 648.60 291 SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT 13.00 251 HA'T'ER DEPT SUPPLIEt, 30.76 52.1.0 227 EQUIP REPAIR PARTS/, TR 21.80 184 OT:,�LETS/MTC AGRMT 72.69 103 CCi:Etl0,/EA6TH000 KNO PR 44.56 103 P2- t4If TAOLF.9/PARK i 504.04 540.60 490 ^U7-PLIE:i/PARIS; �t9.11 247 F'IIdE E%TINGUISHCRt-/MT 1tJ.b0 990 TI.'.CDHI)NG CHARlir..5 J7.G2 090 TES EP11PNE CHARGE:. C). t? 050 Y1:@.E1at:P1N CHA66I:J (150 TE'. FPHONE / 1IACt;( f, 000 YP 1 E.PHON(- CHAkCif. ; t . GO 120. t)0 4041fl J'i/OU/96 lIN!'t;Al, 213 GA, i/FIkC t1� 0. 21.117 *C 'AG ESRC FINANCIAL S.VSTEM OS106/96 11135_:48 LLI IARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 4041'1 05/06/96 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVA 40417 05/06/96 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVA 40418 05/-06/96 WATERPRO SUPPLIES CO 40419 05/06/96 WRIGHT HENN'EPIN SECU 40419 05/08/96 WRIGHT HENNEPIN 'SECU 4042A 05/08/96 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN 'COOP 40421 05/08/96 WSS & ASSOCIATES, IN 40421 05/06/96 WSB & ASSOCIATES; IN 4042.1 05/06/96 WSB & ASSOCIATES. IN 40421 05/06/96 WSC & ASSOCIATES, IN 40421 05/06/96 WSB & ASSOCIATES, IN 40431 05/06/96 WS61 & ASSOCIATES, IN 4002/ 05/06/96 WSB & ASE'OCIATLS, IN 40421 US/Ob/96 Wb8 & ASSOCIATES, IN 40421 05/06/98 WSB & AS30CIATES, IN 40421 n5/09/96 Wfiq & AOSOCIATES. IN 1"4 0411 05/06/96 WSB & ASSOCIATES, IN 40421 05/00/00 W30 & ASfOCIATCO, IN 404?1 05/00/96 WSES Et A&SOCIATES, IN 40421 05/06/96 WSES 6 ASSOCIATES, IN 40421 05/06/90 WSC A ALr.00IATF.S, IN GENCRAL CHCCKING m Disburoement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT C $24 GARBAGE CONTRACT/A 10-,717,41 524 SALES TAX/GARBAGE PYM 695..32 1 1 .4 62.33 'LC 870 METERS/WATER DEPT 914:72 875 DEP REG ALARM MTC AGkM 1.9.12 875 PARKS ALARM MTC AGRMT 15.98 35.10 *C 512 UTILITIES 8.00 093 ENG FEES/BRIAR OAKE 2,530-.50 993 ENG FEES/OUNOAS RD- 3,150,00 993 ENG FEES/MISSISSIPPI S 42.50 99.3 ENG FEES/HWV 25--CZD AR 017.50 993 ENG FEES/kttNT-SING PR 40,50 983 SITE REVIEW & C C MFG ?07.50 993 ENG FEES/RIVER MILLS_ 255.00 999 CNG FCCS/rST1?A PROJ 127.50 903 FNG FEEL/KJFLLD_EkG Fs 807.50 903 ENO FKES/M OAK 4TH ADO 42.50 993 ENG FEES/PATHWAY 357.00 993 ENG FEES/PRAIRIF WEST 89.00 093 ENG FEES/MIELKE LUBE P 42.50 993 ENG FEE3/RUFF AUTO PAR 42.60, 993 ENG FEES/GLORIUOr CHUR 709.00 9,484.00 *c TOTAL 00,055.80 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 05/10%98 11:44:20 CdARRANT DATE 'VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 404'22 05/10/96 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP 40423 05/10/96 LUKACH/JOHN 40423 05/10/96 LUKACH/JOHN 40423 05/10/96 LUKACH/JOHN 40423 05/10/96 LUK'ACH/JOHN 40424 05/10/96 ERNIE'S BAIT SHOP 40425 05/10/96 MAUS FOODS 40425 05/10/96 MAUS FOODS 40425 05/10/96 MAUS FOODS 40426 05/10/96 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 40427 05/10/96 MN BUILDING OFFICIAL 40428 05/13/96 ALSERG WATER SERVICE C 40428 05/13/96 AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS 40430 06/13/96 BUSINESS RECORDS COR 40431 05/13/96 COPY DUPLCATING PROD 40432 05/13/96 CULLIGAN 40433 05/13/96 DISPLAY SALES 40433 05/13/96 DISPLAY SALES 40493 05/13/98 DISPLAY SALES 40434 05/13/96 DUERR'S WATER CARE S 40435 05/13/96 EUROTHERM RECORDERS 40436 05/13/86 FYLES EXCAVATING A H 40437 05'/13/90 G & X SERVICES 40437 05OWS G & K SERVICES 40437 05/13/06 G & K SERVICED 40437 05/19/96 G & K SERVICES 40437 08/13/96 0 6 K SERVICES 40497 05/13/96 G A K SERVICES 404,3? 05/13/96 G A K SERVICES 40437 05/19/06 G A K CERVICES 40437 08/13/96 G & K SERVICES: 40437 05/13/96 G & K GERVICES Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTIONAMOUNT C 512 UTILITIES 1.00 327 MILEAGE REIMS 24.59 327 MILEAGE REIMS 16.38 327 MILEAGE REIMS 16.39 327 MILEAGE REIMS 16.39 73..76 994 SALES TAX/SCALE/TOM B 2.54 108 SUPPLIES/CITY HALL 77.22 108 CLEANING SUP/LIBRARY 73.61 108 SUPPLIES/SHOP & GARAGE 13.79 164.61 118 MATER/ATV/SNOW REG 1,868.00 729 REG FEE/CONF/GARY A 15.00 1039 IMPROVEMENTS/WELL # 2080.00 17 RADIO EQUIP REP/MATER 37.82 27 COMPUTER FORMS/CITY H 221.33 41 LIBRARY COPY MCH MTC 60:80 753 WATER SOFTNER CHG/RENT 23.11 1037 FLAGS/CITY HALL 115.55 1037 FLAGS/LIBRARY 115,.85 1037 FLAGS/PARKS 115.56 346.66 40 WATER 6OFTNER SALT/P WK 7.88 781 WATER MTC SUPPLIES 277.00 280 STORM SEWER ZINE REPA 297.50 851 UNIFORM RENTAL CHGS 51.07 851 UNIFORM RENTAL CHGS 95.49 851 UNIFORM RENTAL CHGS 33.50 851 UNIFORM RENTAL CHGS 93.50 951 UNIFORM RENTAL CHGS 229.62 851 UNIFORM RENTAL CHGS 114.81 851 SHOP RAGS 21.94 851 RUGS/OEP REG BLD 92.57 851 RUGS/STREET DEPT 117.74 851 ENVIRONMENTAL CNG 42.50 sC s� sC 0 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM Q 0500/96 11:44020 WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 40438 05/1.3/98 GREEN/ELIZABETH 40439 05/13/96 HERMES/JERRY 40440 05/1'3/98 JERRY'S AUTO SALVAGE 40441 05/1:3/96 JME OF MONTICELLO 40442 05/13/96 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 40442 05/13/96 LARSON'$ ACE HARDWAR 40442 05/13/96 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 40442 05/13/98 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 40442 05/13/98 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 40442 05/13/96 LARSON'S A`CE HARDWAR 4044,2 05/13/96 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 40442 05/13/88 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 4,0442 05/13/86 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 40443 05/13/96 LASER SHARP, INC. 40444 05/13/,86 MCDOWALL COMPANY 40445 05/13/96 MICROBIOLOGICS, INC. 40446 05/13/96 MINNEGASCO 40446 05/13/86 MINNEGASCO 40446 05/13/96 MINNEGASCO 40446 05/13/96 MINNEGASCO 40446 05/19/96 MINNEGASCO 40446 05/13/96 MINNEGASCO 40446 05/13/96 MINNEGASCO 40446 05/13/96 MINNEGASCO 40447 05/13/96 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CO 40448 05/19/00 MONTICELLO PRINTING 40448 05/13/00 MONTICELLO PRINTING 40448 05/13/08 MONTICELLO PRINTING 40449 05/13/80 MONTICELLO TIMES 40448 05/13/96 MONTICELLO TIME'S y 40440 05/13/96 MONTICELLO TIMES l� 40440 03/13/98 MONTICELLO TIME'S 40449 05/19/96 MONTICELLO TIME'S 40440 09/13/90 MONTICELLO TIMES Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT C 772.74 889 TRAVEL REIMS 22.26 01 LIBRARY CLEANING CONT 227.50 1032 PICKUP REPAIRS/STREETS 37.28 368 ROCK/PARKS 1.155.93 874 SUPPLIES/STREETS 18.62 874 SUPPLIES/P WORKS INSPE 41.11 874 SUPPLIES/PARKS DEPT 142.52 874 BLD MTC SUPPLIES/PARKS 19.53 874 SUPPLIES/PARKS_ DEPT 30.93 874 SUPPLIES/FIRE DEPT 20.63 874 REPAIRS/KRAMER RENTAL 89.69 974 SUPPLIES/C HALL 4.39 874 SMALL TOOLS/PARKS 92.13 459.48 936 CARTRIDGE/C HL COMPUT 203.74 111 FURNACE REPAIRS/C HAL 1,68.40 891 WATER TESTING 75.00 772 UTILITIES 189.50 772 UTILITIES 41.31 7.72 UTILITIES 55.07 772 UTILITIES 81.85 772 UTILITIES 9.08 772 UTILITIES 530.18 772 UTILITIES 1,375.50 772 UTILITIES 202.84 2,415.73 105 ANIMAL CONTROL CONT 1029.70 137 BUSINESS CARDS/JOHN S 31.42 137 OU9INESS CAROD/TDM B 31.42 137 LABELS/FIRE DEPT 52.68 115.50 140 LEGAL PUBLICATIONS 1,050.36 140 HELP WANTED AD FOR PA 180.00 140 SLO PERMIT INFO 58.00 140 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 280.89 140 AD/MATER FLUSHING INF 140.60 140 P HEARING/OUNOAS RD/CM 72.00 sc KC O tI �1 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 05/10/96, 11.:44520 WARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 46449 05/13/96 MONTICELLO TIMES 40446 05/13/96 MONTICELLO TIMES 40460 05'/13/96 MTI OISBTRIBUTING CO 40451 05/1-3/96 NINTY FOUR SERVICES 40452 05/13/96 OLSON & SONS ELEC.TRI 40452 05/13/96 OLSON & SONS ELECTRI 40453 05/13/96 PAUL A WALDRON & ASS 40454 05/13/96 PHOTO I 40454 05/13/98 PHOTO I 40454 05/13/.96 PHOTO I 40455 05/13/86 PREUSSE'S CLEANING $ 40456 05/13/96 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 46457 05/13/96 RIVERSIDE OIL 40456 05/13/96 RUFF AUTO PARTS 40459 05/13/96 SIOUX VALLEY ENVIRON 40460 05/13/96 SOUTHAM BUSINESS COM 40461 05/13/96 SPEC MATERIALS.. INC. 40462 05/13/08 TRUNNELL/L VLE 40463 05/13/06 WALOOR PUMP & EQUIPM 40464 05/13/96 WARNING LITES OF MIN 40465 05/13/99 WATERPRO SUPPLIES CO 40466 05/19/96 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO 40466 08/13/96 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO 40466 05/19/98 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITO 40407 05/13/06 WRIGHT COUNTY RECORD Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT C 140 LIBRARY BOARD OPENING 47.80 140 AD/MOWING B IDS 28_:39 1,876.71 299 VEH MTC SUP PLIES/PARK 945.24 1041 VAN RENTAL/PARKS MTG 86.96 160 CITY HALL PARKING LOT 163.81 160 STREET LIGHTS REPAIRE 353.20 517.01 830 BUILDING INSPECTION 3,382.50 743 PICTURES/WW TP12.90 743 PICTURES/P WORKS INSPE 17.47 743 PICTURES/PLAN & ZON 14.85 45.22 173 CITY HALL CLEANING CO 400.00 175 WWTP CONTRACT PAYM 34,81'8.70 496 GAS/STREETS 1,002.00 268 REPAIRS/JOHN S PICKUP 258.04 527 GASKETS/WATER DEPT 20.10 ,644 OUNDAS RD/F ALLON IMPR 307.80 198, MTC OF EQUIP/STREETS 100.73 .90440 TREE REPLACEMENT PROGR 30.00 369 EQUIP REPAIR/PUMP/SEN 705.48 676 FIELD MANUALS/CTREET D 75.00 070 WATER METERS 1,372.80 219 TAX COOK LIJTINGS 90.20 219 SHERtFF'0 CONTRACT 25,234.00 216 ADD'L LAND FILL CHG 8,257.80 33.580.00 254 UTILITY EAS EMFNTS/R M 156.00 40498 05/13/90 Y.M.C.A. OF MINMEAPO 224 CONTRACT PAYMENT 625.00 GENERAL CHECKING TOTAL 92.603.00 4c BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM OS/ 17194 12:•33-: 12 ARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 4.0190 05/17/-96 C J BROWN BUSINESS 40190 05/17/96 C J, BROWN BUSINESS S 40351 05/17/9$ LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 40469 05/17/96 SUBWAY 4,0470 05/17/96 GUIMONT/'TIM 40474 05/17/96 A & C METALS 404]2 05/17/96 MN DEPART OF NATURAL 40473 05/17/96 EHLERS & ASSOC,INC P 404.74 06/1,7/96 AR'AMARK 40475 05/17/86 ARCA MINNESOTA, INC. 40470 06j17/00 AUTOMATION -SUPPLY C 40477 05/17/96 D J'S MUNICIPAL SUPP 40477 05/17/96 0 J'9 MUNIC OAL SUPP 40477 09/17/96 D J'S MUNICIPAL SUPP 40470 05/17/90 FED EX 40419 05/11/96 FOSTER-FRANaEN-CARLS 40400 05/17/96 FRONTLINE PLUS FIRE 40400 05/17/96 FRONTLINE PLUG FIRE 40481 09/17/90 FVLE. BRAO 4D401 06/17/96 FYLE, BRAD 40402 1U5/17/96 GROTECH 404OZ 05/17/90 KENNLOY 8 GRAVEN 40403 05/17/00 KENNEDY @ GRAVEN 4040 05/17/96 KENNFOY & GRAVEN 4040^ 05/17/96 KENNEDY 8 GRAVEN c�04C4 05/17/96 L G L- A.3PHALT. INC. oisbursement-Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CL 597 lE,TTERS/DOWNTWN REDEV 1'42.50 597 LETTERS/OOWNTWN REOEV bf2:.,SOCR 0'.60 *CH 241 CHECK VOIDED 1'74.,00 t(042 FOOD/hEETING 35.46 1043 REIMS/SAFETY BOOTS 79.95 96441 ALUMINUM/LIFT STATION 269.00 118 WATER/ATV REG 2,051,00 933 REG FEE/.SEMINAR/OLLIE 35.00 848 CITY HALL SUPPLIES 57.00 534 JUNK AMNESTY DAY CH 1,791.00 19 COMPUTER'PAPER/C HALL ?00,00 1047 GLOVCC/WATER DEPT 12.71 1047 GLOVES/SEWER COLL 12.7:2 1047 GLOVES/STREET DEPT 25.43 50.06 304 POSTAGE/RETURN RECYC S 24.50 09 INS PREM/HWY 25 RIGHT 60..00 $10 04TC OF VEH/FIRE DEPT 420.00 5.1C HOSE/NO3'ZLE/FIRE DEPT 460.30 0001. DO 92 EXPENSE REIMO 133,.12 62 TELEPHONE Run 1'00,03 271.75 104b EQUIP/SPREADER/PARK 1,465.00 949 LEGAL F$l:t;/KATZMARLK P 30.00 930 LEGAL FEET,/MISC 941.46 930 LCGAL FUC3/PRAIREF. WE 564.70 D39 L-EGAL FEED/DOWNTOWN R 114,15 1,100.30 923 STREET RF,P/MATER MA 2,040.00 CR MCH 'BCH s1;H '611 0 'BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 05/17/96 12:33,::12 ARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING ,40495 05./17/38 MN COPY SYSTEMS INC 40488 05/17/98 MN POLLUTION CONTROL 40487 05/17/96 NORTHERN STATES POWL 40487 06/17/96 NORTHERN STATES POWE 40487 05/17/96 NORTHERN STATES POWE 40460 05117/96 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONS 40488 05/17/96 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONS 40489 05/17/96 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONS 40409 05/17/96 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, I 40490 05/17/96 ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON 40491 05/17/96 RIBBON RECYCLERS INC 4044'> 05/11/96 RIVERPLACE PHYSICIAN c'+0493 05/17,/-96 ROAD MACHINERY 8 SUP 40494 05/17/96 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORPOR 40495 05/17/96 SUNNY FRESH 40496 05/ 1 7/98 TD13 TELNCOM 40606 05/17/96 TOG TELECOM 404',,9:3 05/17./96 TOO TELECOM 404,rTG 05/17/98 Til: TELECOM 40496 OS/11/96 TOS TELECOM 404+5G 05/17/96 TDO TELECOM 40400 05/11/90 TOO TE L1 G(QM 4,0490 05/17/96 TOS TELECOM 40496 05/17/DU T09 TELECOM 4640t5 05/17/96 ID', TELECOM 40400 05117/96 TOS TF:LLCOM 40467 05/17/08 TF.LRQN =00RAYI©N 4011 '.0 05/17/90 UNITED LABORATORIEG 40409 0(4/17/06 VALUE. 01Ul� HOMES r 40403 05/ 17AG VAL UE PLUr, KOME, l '#0409 05/17/90 VAIAN' PLUr, HOMED 404!)0 05/17/06 VALUE. PLUS HOME 40401) 03/ 17/90 VAI.Ut 141,U9 HUMF , Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CL 756 COPY MCH MTC AdRMT 91:95 121 ANNUAL PERMIT FEE:/S 1,140:00 148 UTILITIES 5,136.26 148 UTILITIES 8,14 148 UTILITIES_ 76.19 5,221,19 *CH $50 PROF SERV/XLEIN FARMS 15.00 550 MISC PROF SERVICES $81.89 950 PLANNING COAMISS'SON M 150.00 726.68 *CH 836 GOFER ONE STATE CALLS 320.00 162 640 FEES/MISS SHORES 807,.50 1048 COMPUTER RIBBONS 50.93 1011 TF.9TING/STREETS 25.00 102 PARTS/MTC OF EOLIIP/ST 322.16 198 CABINET & TOOLS/SMO 1,777,22 1.046 TE.TING/NEW WWTP 312.03 953 TELEPHONE CHARGES 343.36 053 TELEPHONE CHARGES 78.7$ 933 rELEPHPNL• CHARGGO 14,7.94 053 TELEPHONE CHARGE'S 1351.2.8 953 TELEPHONE CHARG;',S 50.00 953 TEL0146NE CHARGES 50,74 953 LF1,91PHONE CHARGtzS 1,04.96 058 TELEPHONE CHARGES 43-,95 05'3 TELEPHONE CHARGITS !9,74 DEv3 TELEPHONE CHARGc0 040.91 95d TEI.EPHONE CNARG!:S 116.05 1,979.:10 rt'li' 042 NCW RECYCLING WAND 03.04 054 CAR GHAMPOO/STREETS, 109.14 807 REF11NU/60 PERM 04.24 406.01 001 REFUNU/BLD PERM 04-24 300.00 007 RF'FUND/01.0 1444 04-24 HOO.UO 097 ERE UNPJULU PENH 04, 2401 5.0!'1 007 RLUNO/01.0 PERM 04 -240 90.0,1 z E1RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM ARRANT DATE VENDOR GENERAL CHECKING 40499 05/17/96 VALUE PLUS HOMES 40500 05/17/96 WOLF,STELLER/RICHARb 40501 05/17/96 MRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP 40502 05/11/86 ZIEGLER, INC. ,GENERAL CHECKING c_: Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT GL 867 REFUND/BLD -PERM 94-148 30.00 1,221.86 *cH 217 REIMS/CONFERENCE EXP 135.32 512 UTILITIES/BOHANON FARM 22.24 425 PARTS/MTC OF EOUIP/STR 15..93 TOTAL 25,860,89 EM FINANCIAL SYSTEM /3'0/96 15;1104:28 Disbursement Journal WARRANT OATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT LIQUOR CHECKING 1060 OIAI30-196 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA, 806021 FkEIGHT CHARGES 16.69 1e70 04/-30/,90 JOHNSON OROS WHOL-ESA 600022 ' LIQUOR PURCHASE 512;.32 18766 64/30/96 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 800012.2 WINE PURCHASE 653.11 1,132.12 18781 04/30/96 NORTHWEST CARPET & U 800179 CARPET CLEANED 2EB2,23 18762 04/30/96 THE WINE COMPANY 800206 WINE PURCHASE 8e8.00 10703 04/30/96 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 800012 WINE PURCHASE 2813.50 18764 04/30/96 JOHNSON BROS WHOLSSA 800022 FREIGHT CHARGES 120.25 1.0764 04/30196 JOHNSON BROS. WHOLESA B00022 LjoubR PURCHASE 197-.45 18764 04/3V/16 JOHNSON r.Ros WHOLESA 800022 WINE PURCHASE 2.;650:10 21900.10.0 18765 04/30/96 PHILLIP$ WINE & SPIR 800100 FRE143HY CHARGE,,3 12'.40 10:765 04/90/98 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIR 000180 UOUOR PURCHASE 850.72 10765 04/30/96 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIR $00190 WINE PURCHASE 99.75 062.07 �—,ir,G 04/36/06 F.AGI.E WXNr,. COMPANY 800012 BEER PURCHASE 25.00 10766 04/30/06 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 800012 WINE PURCHkA 1$6.66 10766 04/30/08 r-.A(;s.E WINE L COMPANY 860012 M, X FOR RESALE 40.-50 ???i 15 I 01i 1 04/30/96 OR-1600. COOPER 1) COM 800016 LIQUOR PURCHAfOE 1,604.50 107130 04/10/06 QUALITY WINE & 1,1>1RI 800040 LTOUOR PURCKA8E 080.70 107GO 04/30/96 QUALrTYWXNR 0 SPIRI 400640 VINK PURCHASE "6.94 10.769 04/30/90 MN U.C. I:I)Nf) 000011,0 UC 9ENrrTTS/r oOLLv 10.00 10710 04/9D/9G OUSINE05 C. 000067 CALCULATOR/OFFICE SUP 199.32 IU??U U41')U/n0 HE89E/1;C0T1 0002107 TOnACCO PROC)kJ(;T';/Rf'jA[. 07.00 CHCCRiNG TOTAL t0,:;30. 31 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM i 05/02/98 08:13:46 Disbursement Journal `WARRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT LIQUOR CHECKING 18771 05/02/96 BELLBOY CORPORATION 600098 COOLERS FOR RESALE 384.80 18772 05/02/96 BERNICK'S PEPSI COLA 800601 POP PURCHASE 407.20 18773 05/02/96 CITY OF MONTICELLO 800003 SEWER WATER BILL 24.17 187.74 05/02/,:98 OAHLHEIMER DISTRI8UT 600009 BEER PURCHASE 8,98 6.55 19774, 05/02/86 OAHLHEIMER OISTRIBUT 800009 NON ALCOHOLIC BEER 2,65..10 9,141.65 a� 18775 05/02/98 DAY DISTRIBUTING COM 800010 BEER PURCHASE 754.00 1078 05/02/98 DICT( WHOLESALE CO., 800011 BEER PURCHASE 681.12 18778 05/02/96 DICK WHOLESALE CO., 800011 NON ALCOHOLIC BEER 40.00 18776 05/02/98 016K WHOLESALE CO., 800011 BAGS/SUPPLIES 46.50 767.62 •( 18777 05/02/96 DISCOUNT PAPER PRODU 800177 OFFICE SUPPLIES 152.97 19778 05/62/98 EAGLE WINE COMPANY' 800012 CREDIT -/MINE 4.97CR Q 1877.8 05/02/98 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 600012, WINE PURCHASE 80.0,0 •( 78.'09 18778 05/62/96 FLESCH'S PAPER SERVI 800118• PAPER BAGS/SUPPLIES 70.85 18700 05/02/88 G & K SERVICE 600129 RUGS/MTC OF BLD 108.52 18781 05/02/96 GRIGOS,. COOPER A COM 000019 LIQUOR PURCHASE 6,191.64 18.782 05/02/08 GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE 1 600019 BEER PURCHASE 11,247.13 18783 03/02/96 HOME JUICE 800138 JUICE FOR RESALE 15.10 18764 05/02/98 JOHNSON 0103 WHOLESA 800022 CREDIT/FREIGHT 0.75CR 10784 05/02/98 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 800022 FREIGHT CHARGES 93.73 18764 08/02/06 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 800022 LIQUOR PURCHASE 4,838.50 18764 05/02/96 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 800022 WINE CREDIT 24.90CR' 19784 05/02/96 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 000022 WINE PURCHASE 21477.09 7,171.27 •t 18705 05/02/86 LARSON'S ACE HARDWAR 900184 BLD MTC, SUPPLIES 19.10 18788 05/02/86 MINNEGASCO 800160 UTILITIES 91.12 18797 05/02/96 MN JAYCEES 800100 ADVERTISING 55.00 /r 10788 05/02/96 PAUSTI9 A SONS 800103 WINE PURCHASE 192.30 �l 18708 05/02/96 PAUSTIS & SONS 800103 FREIGHT CHARGES 4.00 198.30 •( BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 05/02/98 08:13:48 Disbursement Journal /ARRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT LIQUOR CHECKING 18789 05/02/86 PHILLIPS VINE A SPIR 800180 FREIGHT CHARGES 50.44 18789 05/02/96 PHILLIPS WINE A SPIR 800100 LIQUOR PURCHASE 483.88 18789 05/02/96 PHILLIPS WINE A SPIR 800180 WINE PURCHASE 2,020.40 2,554.70 t( 16790 05/02/96 QUALITY MINE B SPIRT 800040 LIQUOR PURCHASE 192.84 18791 05/02/96 ROWS IC£ COMPANY 800041 ICE PURCHASE 178.54 18792 05/02/98 ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT 800045 ITEMS FOR RESALE 110.87 18792 OS/02/96 ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT 800045 PAPER BAGS/SUPPLIES 85.28 196.23 •( 18793 05/02/96 THE WATSON CO., INC. 800202 CIGS a CIGARS/RESALE 204.83 18793 05/02/96 THE WATSON CO., INC. 800202 LIQUOR STORE SUPPLIES 66.42 271.25 •t 18794 05/02/96 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 800048 BEER PURCHASE 19,094.75 18784 05/02/96 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 800048 NON ALCOHOLIC BEER 188.40 19,261.15 sc 18795 05/02/96 U S LINK 800195 TELEPHONE CHARGES 10.92 16796 05/02/98 VIKING COCA-COLA BOT 800051 POP PURCHASE 402.38 19797 05/02/96 WRIGHT COUNTY TREAS/ 800134 TAXES/SIDEWALK IMP PRO 89.49 18798 05/02/98 WRIGHT MAY SHOPPER 711 ADVERTISING 350.00 LIQUOR CHECKING TOTAL 60,183.77 �I 0 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM C/13/9$ 141'04:58 bisbulrsement Jourhal WARRANT DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT C LtWOR CHECKING 16799 05/13/96 CONSOLIDATED COMWO1 800163 ADVERTISING 47.50 18400 0'5/ 13/96, DAHLHEIME0 DISTRIGUT 800009 NON ALCOHOLIC BEER -PURCHASE 93'.6 , 0 18600 05/13/96 DAHLHEIMEk 01,STRIBUT 800,009 13ftk- 8,766.10 8;,;859. 70 *C 18001 05/13/96 DAY OISTRIBUTrNG COM 600010 BEER PURCHASE 204.90 18002 65/13/96 DICK WHOLESALE CO., 600011 BEER PURCHASE 1.341.46 18802 05/13/96 DICK WHOLESALE CO., 800041 BAGS/S`kiPPLiEzS 1A2.0 1'8802 05/13/98 DICK WHOLESALE CO., 800011 LlQ6OR"STdRE SUPPLIES 29.23 1,502.62 SCI 18003 05/13/96 EAGLE WINE COMPANY e00012 WINE PURCHASE 2',202..48 10903 65/13/06 EAGLE WINE COMPANY $00012 FREIGHT CHARGES 15.72 18803 05/1,3/96 EAGLE WINE 'COMPANY 000012 MIX FOR RESALE t0S.75 9,343.95 $.cj Ie804 0/13/96 FISH & GAME FINDER M 000209 ADVERTISING 42.50 9805 05/13/06 GRIGGS,, COOPER 9 COM 00,6019 LIQUOR PURCHASE 4,08.76, 0605 05/t3/96 GR IGO, COOPER & COM 900096 FREIGHT CHARGES 32.90 4,64I.66 *Ct' 19006 05/13/96 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 800022 FREIGHT CHARGES 77'.30 18806 O5/13/90 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 900682 L14V61R PURCHASE 1,01.92 18006 OS/ 11/96 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESA 860622 WINE PURCHASE 3.469.14 1'8806 05/ 13/96 JOHNSON BROS WHOLEVA 06.0022 dREDIT/GIONELLI LAMRUS 72,.S-iCR 5,124.75 *CF 10007 05/1'3/00 L.IEFERT TRUCKING: 800-025 FREIGHT CHARGES 705.98 10000 03/13/06 MONTICELLO TIMES 80003-2 ADVERTISING 18200 10009 0/13/80 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIR 000400 FREIGHT CHARGES 20.58 0606 05/13/96 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIR 000180 LIQUOR PURCHASE 119,39.02 IVOOS 05/13/96 PHILLIPS WINE 6 SPIR 800100 WINE PURCHASE 721.96 3$580..36 *Cf, 10010 f3 05/15/98 QUALITY WINE & SPIRI 000640 WINE PURCHASE 406.157 10010 05/13/06 QUALITY WINE & SPIRT 800040 LIQUOR PURCHASE ),,491. 70 31900.35 *a t'JO 1 1 05/13/00 THE WATSON CO., INC. 800202 GIGS A CIGARS/kESALE 240.60 10619 05/13/96 THORPE DISTRIBUTING 000048 BEER PURCHASE 6.771.45 1001? 05/11/96 THORPE DIST91OUTINQ 000048 NON ALCOHOLIC BEER 99.90 0,007.1)5 Ito ERC FINANCIAL SVSTEM, Ic /1,3/96 1504-:58 Oisbursefh'ent J'ournol WARRAN-r DATE VENDOR. DEScRilp-TION AMOUNT C LIQUOR CHECKING 18813 6,5/13/96 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTE 800112 LABELS/SUPPLIES 24.30 4814 05/13/96 U S WEST COMMUNICATI-600093 ADVERTISING 21.00 LIQUOR CHECKING TOTAL 37,978-.29, t L