City Council Agenda Packet 10-28-1996AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, October 28,19W - 7 p.m.
Mayor. Brad Fyle
Council Members: Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Tom Perrault
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held October 14, 1996.
3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda.
4. Citizens commentalpetitions, requests, and complaints.
6. Consent agenda.
A. Consideration of an application for carnival license --Monticello Mall
Merchants Association.
0 (�) Consideration to adopt a resolution calling for a public hearing for the
o ; modification of the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project
No. 1, modification of the TIF Plans for TIF District Nos. 1.1 through
1-20, and approving the TIF Plan for the establishment of TIF District
No. 1-21(T.J. Martin, Inc.).
C. Consideration of change order U2 and final payment on Project 96-01C,
Dundas Road/Fallon Avenue improvements --Annandale Contracting.
D. Consideration of request for final plat approval of the Monticello
Business Center commercial subdivision. Applicant, Ocello LLC.
6. Public Hearing --Consideration of approving on -sale liquor license transfer --
Hawk's Sports Bar and Grill.
7. Public Hearing --Adoption of proposed assessment roll for delinquent
ac eounte receivable bills and certification of assessment roll to County
Auditor.
8. Public Hearing on adoption of proposed assessment roll for delinquent utility
bills and certification of assessment roll to County Auditor.
9. Consideration of extending conceptual agreement governing sanitary sower
connection to the Kjcllberg West Mobilo Homo Park.
Agenda
Monticello City Council
October 28, 1996
Page 2
10. Consideration of reviewing 9 -month liquor store financial report.
11. Consideration of approving renewal of joint fire department contracts with
Silver Creek Township and City of Otsego.
12. Consideration of bills for the month of October.
13. Adjournment.
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, October 14, 1996.7 p m.
Members Present: Brad Fyle, Shirley Anderson, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Tom
Perrault
Members Absent: None
Appmal of minutes of the regular meeting h lre d Satemher 2.1 1996.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY TOM
PERRAULT TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING HELD
SEPTEMBER 23,1996, AS WRITTEN. Motion carried unanimously.
.o aid .ration of adding item_Ft to the agenda.
A. It was the consensus of Council to set a special Council meeting for
Tuesday, November 12,1998, at 6 p.m., to review the 1997 budget.
B. Assistant Administrator Jeff O'Neill requested Council input
regarding a sign permit request made by the owners of Westside
Market. He noted that Westside Market is a lawful nonconforming
use, and the owners requested permission to remove the current sign
from the south side of the building and install a lit canopy sign on the
front of the building. In addition, it was proposed to remove the
current identification sign from the pump canopy. Apart from the
additional lighting on the canopy, the total sign area would not be
expanded.
After discussion, it was the consensus of Council that the proposed
signage does not constitute expansion of a lawful nonconforming use,
and a sign permit could be issued to Westside Market provided that
the new sign follows city ordinance.
C. Public Works Director John Simola reported that the water tower
painting crew from Pittsburg Tank & Tower Company, Inc., left
Monticello on October b, 1996. After being unable to obtain
information on the status of the completion of the project, a certified
letter was sent to Pittsburg Tank d Tower indicating that liquidated
damages of $60 per calendar day would begin on October 9, 1996, until
the project was completed.
Simola noted that the superintendent apparently left the job due to
personal problems, and his supervisor has not yet been able to contact
him. A crew could be rescheduled to finish the railing painting-,
Page 1
Council Minutes - 10/14/96
however, Pittsburg has few people that are able to complete the logo
work. Pittsburg offered a 10'% reduction in the cost of the logo if the
City of Monticello would delay completion of the project until the
spring of 1997.
After discussion, it was the consensus of Council that Pittsburg Tank
& Tower Company be required to complete the water tower painting
project as soon as possible.
D. Public Works Director John Simola reported that after reviewing the
treatment plant costa a second time with HDR, additional items were
deleted from the project, which would bring the total savings to
approximately $750,000. Simola noted that HDR did not notify the
City each time the coat rose above 5% as required and that a few issues
remain to be settled with HDA.
No one was present from Superior Services.
Cn_ agent ng�nda.
A. Consideration of final pn=pnt to Bo iu .: ayat'ng, Inc.- for
Southw et Area Ll ility ImpmvementA- Cityftuect 95-01C.
Recommendation: Authorize final payment to Bonine Excavating
for Southwest Area Utility Improvements, Project 95.01C, in the
amount of $11,684.33.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY TOM
PERRAULT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS RECOMMENDED.
Motion carried unanimously.
t :nnsiderntion of a request for gn nmyndmnnt la n conrlitinnni uAe pr=it
nllowin8 mmme r_inl nd--*--irnntuAPFtinaPZMtnnP. Ani i nnt. Rah
Ho mnn/Hillaide P rtnera i .
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that Rob Hoffman, owner of Jala
Peno a (JP's) restaurant, and the owners of the Hillside Partnership
requested permission to allow outdoor seating in a portion of the parking
area adjacent to the rear door of the building. The seating area would occupy
six parking spaces and would be designated by potted plants and a
temporary fence at this time, with a dock possibly added in the future. The
Page 2 P
Council Minutes - 10/14/96
outside area would be closed ii hour after the kitchen closed at 10 p.m.
O'Neill noted that 4-6 tables would be situated in the area with muted
decorative lighting but would include no music or signs. In addition,
Hoffman would plant additional trees to help screen the area.
O'Neill continued to note that according to the conditional use permit now
governing the site, a deficiency in parking was accounted for through a proof
of parking requirement, which required that the owner install the full
complement of parking if the need arose as defined by the Planning
Commission. The parking would be extended easterly into the vacant area
alongside the railroad tracks; however, it did not appear that additional
parking would be necessary at this time. O'Neill also reported that the
owners of the site indicated that they would enter into an agreement
requiring installation of additional parking space if needed as defined by the
Planning Commission, which would include a letter of credit or financial
guarantee that the City could use if necessary. The Planning Commission
recommended approval of the amendment to the conditional use permit.
Rob Hoffman stated that he planned to alert with 4-6 tables but would like to
add as many as the area would accommodate in the future. A petition
presented by Hoffman included signatures from neighboring property owners
who were not opposed to the outdoor seating request.
Councilmember Herbst suggested that the Council stipulate a seating
capacity for the area in order to minimize congestion and noise. Hoffman
requested that Council consider a maximum of 12 tables, seating 4 customers
each, for a total capacity of 48 people.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND
SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO APPROVE THE AMENDMENT TO THE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ALLOWING OUTSIDE SEATING AT JALA PENO'S
RESTAURANT SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE EXISTING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, INCLUDING PROOF OF PARKING
PROVISIONS.
2. OUTSIDE SEATING HOURS END 46 HOUR AFTER THE KITCHEN
CLOSES OR AT 10:30 P.M., WHICHEVER IS SOONER.
3. NO MUSIC OR ADVERTISING SIGNAGE ALLOWED.
4. LIGHTING SHALL BE SUBDUED.
6. ADDITIONAL TREE PLANTINGS MUST BE COMPLETED AS
IDENTIFIED ON THE SITE PLAN.
Page 3
Council Minutes - 10/14/96
FOOD SHALL BE THE PRIMARY SERVICE PROVIDED; HOWEVER,
LIQUOR AND BEER MAY BE SERVED. LIQUOR MAY NOT BE
POURED OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING.
OUTSIDE DINING AREA SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE AREA
ENCOMPASSED BY SDC STALLS AT THE LOCATION IDENTIFIED
ON THE SITE PLAN. SEATING SHALL BE LIMITED TO 12
TABLES, SEATING 4 CUSTOMERS EACH, FOR A TOTAL
MAXIMUM SEATING CAPACITY OF 48.
Motion carried unanimously. Motion was based on the finding that the
proposed use is consistent with the purpose of the PZM zone; and due to the
type of use and the conditions noted, the activity would not be detrimental to
the neighborhood in which it is located. Therefore, the proposed use is
consistent with the comprehensive plan for the city.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill informed Mr. Hoffman that trees planted
now for additional screening would likely have to be replaced at the owner's
expense when the parking lot is expanded due to storm sewer improvements
that are needed.
City Administrator Rick Wolfsteller reported that at the June 10 Council
meeting, representatives of the Masonic Lodge approached the Council with
a proposal for the City to take over ownership and operation of the Riverside
Cemetery. The Council generally approved of the idea of taking over
ownership of the cemetery after further investigating the coat of operations.
Currently, the general day-to-day operations at the cemetery are handled by
three individuals. Wolfsteller noted that Bill Kearin has recently been more
involved with the placing and setting of headstones and has been a good
resource for staff to consult with regarding its day-to-day operations. City
staff hopes to continue utilizing his services for this purpose. Mary Bray is
the current Sexton and is the contact for potential sales and marking of grave
sites for upcoming funerals and is compensated $150 per month. Wolfsteller
noted that it is the City's intention to continue utilizing her services over the
winter months and finalize a job description that can be used for contracting
next spring. During the winter, the City will be obtaining bids from
interested parties for providing the caretaker service along with contract
mowing and leaf cleanup. The Masonic Lodge has currently used Careftw
Lawn Service on a contract basis for mowing and leaf pickup.
Page 4 0
Council Minutes - 10/14/96
The third primary contract service that is utilized is Ray Glunz of Buffalo,
who does the grave site excavation and backfilling along with restoration
services. The City would also continue utilizing Mr. Gluni s services based
on the recommendation of the Lodge, who has been happy with his services.
Wolfsteller recommended that the cemetery be run as an enterprise fund
similar to the sewer, water, and liquor operations, as the revenue generated
from the operation should be sufficient to cover its expenditures. It was
suggested by the City Attorney that any transfer of funds from the Masonic
Lodge to the City be contingent upon a review of the cemetery finances and
accounting procedures and acceptable title opinion on the land.
Jim Fleming, attorney for the Masonic Lodge, noted that the perpetual care
fund is made up of a series of bonds which are in investment accounts
managed by IDS. The Lodge has executed a resolution as required by
statute, which identifies each fund, account, and amount of money available.
As of the most recent evaluation, $21,080.33 is available. In addition,
Fleming reported that there are funds in a checking account at First
National Bank of Monticello under the new of Riverside Cemetery
Absociation, with a current balance of $13,470.42. A check in this amount
was drafted by the Lodge, along with the necessary paperwork for transfer to
the City.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND
SECONDED BY TOM PERRAULT TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE
TRANSFER OF THE RIVERSIDE CEMETERY AND PERPETUAL CARE FUNDS
FROM THE MASONIC LODGE TO THE CITY CONTINGENT UPON CITY
ATTORNEY APPROVAL. Voting in favor: Shirley Anderson, Tom Perrault,
Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf. Opposed: Brad Fyle. Motion passed.
SEE RESOLUTION 96-40.
FAIRE FIRE ALARM POLICY
City Administrator Rick Wollkteller reported that the Council previously
discussed the possibility of establishing a new policy that would allow the
fire department to charge individuals or businesses for numerous false fire
alarms. Due to security systema becoming more popular in businesses and
residential properties, the fire department has seen an increase in the
number of false alarms. Because many false alarms occur due to a security
system problem that simply needs adjusting, the Joint Fire Board felt it
would be appropriate to establish a policy that allows each property owner
Page 0
Council Minutes - 10/14/96
one false alarm annually; but after receiving a warning, the second false
alarm would allow the department to send a bill for $100, and each false
alarm thereafter would cost $260. This would provide an incentive for
property owners to make sure their systems are serviced and operating
properly.
It was the consensus of the Council last December to table action on adoption
of this policy pending input from Silver Creek Township and the City of
Otsego, who are serviced by the City's fire department. Both jurisdictions
indicated that they would be in agreement with such a policy, as it could help
keep fire department costs down. Wolfsteller noted that for city of Monticello
residents, any unpaid false alarm charge could be placed as a lien against
their property taxes. Monticello Township would be responsible for collecting
their charges, and the City of Otsego and Silver Creek Township would be
responsible for reimbursing the fire department for any unpaid charges from
their jurisdiction. In exchange for this contract language change, the Joint
Fire Board recommended keeping the fee of $36 per parcel for the contract
renewals.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND
SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO ADOPT THE FALSE FIRE ALARM POLICY
AS RECOMMENDED BY THE JOINT FIRE BOARD ESTABLISHING A FEE OF
$100 FOR THE SECOND FALSE FIRE ALARM WITHIN A 12 -MONTH PERIOD
(JANUARY • DECEMBER CALENDAR YEAR) AND A FEE OF $260 FOR THE
THIRD OR MORE OFFENSE. Motion carried unanimously.
Councilmember Herbst requested that the fire contracts for the City of
Otsego and Silver Creek Township be reviewed by Council prior to being
renewed.
SALARY SCHEDULE - FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS
The City Administrator reported that the Joint Fire Board has recommended
that an annual wage structure be established for various fire department
officers in lieu of the present policy of allowing the Chief, Assistant Chief,
Secretary, and Treasurer to be paid $7 per fire whether or not they attend
the fire. In addition to these four officers, it was recommended that the two
Captains and two Training Officers also be included in the salary schedule,
as it is becoming difficult to find volunteers to conduct training seminars
each month. Wolfsteller noted that the salary schedule could be funded by
reallocating expenditures for 1997 and would not require the fire department
budget to be increased at this time.
Page 6 0
Council Minutes - 10/14/96
Fire Chief Mark Wallen requested that the Chaplain be added to the salary
schedule, as he is also on call to help fire and accident victims.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND
SECONDED BY BRAD FYLE TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING SALARY
SCHEDULE FOR THE NINE FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS IN LIEU OF
PAYING $7 PER HOUR FOR EACH FIRE CALL:
FIRE CHIEF
$1,500 ANNUALLY
ASST. FIRE CHIEF
600
TREASURER
300
SECRETARY
450
CAPTAINS (2)
300 EACH
TRAINING OFFICER 1
500
TRAINING OFFICER 2
300
CHAPLAIN
_MD
TOTAL
$4,500
Motion carried unanimously.
rn. "K
City Administrator Rick Wolfsteller reported that as part of the union
negotiations and contract settlement last April, the City Council agreed to
further investigate the idea of amending the present sick leave policy in
regard to the maximum number of days that could be accumulated and the
severenoe policy relating to unused sick leave. As part of the contract
settlement, the City agreed that any changes approved for non-union
members would also apply to the union membership retroactive to April 1,
1996,
MAXIMUM SICK LEAVE ACCUMULATION
The current policy indicates that a maximum of 100 days is allowed to be
accumulated under the sick leave program. Wolfateller reported that the
union personnel had asked for an increase in the maximum accumulation, as
they felt a good employee who has not abused or been required to use a large
amount of sick leave days should not be penalized by no longer accumulating
any additional days but should be rewarded in some way.
REVERENCE PAY PROVISIONS
The second part of the discussion concerned the amount of benefit that is
payable from sick leave accumulation upon retirement. Any employee who
has worked for the City longer than 10 years can receive 60% of their unused
Page 7 0
Council Minutes - 10/14/96
sick leave benefits upon retirement up to a maximum of 50 days' pay.
Wolfsteller noted that during negotiations, the union had sought to have
100% of their sick leave benefits usable by the employee for maintaining
health insurance coverage after retirement, which may encourage an
employee to consider earlier retirement. From the employer's standpoint,
this would allow the City to spread out the coat of the severence pay over a
number of years rather than in one lump sum. From the employee's
standpoint, current tax codes do not consider as income any payment made
by the City for continuing health insurance coverage to an employee who
retires.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND
SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO AMEND THE SICK LEAVE POLICY BY
ALLOWING CONTINUED ACCUMULATION OF 1 DAY PER MONTH AFTER 100
DAYS' ACCUMULATION, 100% TO BE USED FOR CONTINUING HEALTH
INSURANCE COVERAGE. IF THE EMPLOYEE CHOOSES A CASH PAYMENT AT
RETIREMENT, 80% OF THE FIRST 100 DAYS WOULD BE PAID, AND ANY
ACCUMULATION ABOVE 100 DAYS WOULD BE LOST. THE NEW POLICY IS
RETROACTIVE TO APRIL 1, 1996. Motion carried unanimously.
10. Consideration of authoriTng p iN ase of city hall office worlmtat.on dividers.
City Administrator Wolfsteller reported that $11,800 was included in the
1991 and 1992 budgets to cover the coat of office dividers for city ball
workstations. The intent at that time was to look at providing a workstation
structure that would lessen the mise between each desk and provide a better
appearance when entering city hall. Quotes obtained in 1992 for
workstations, which included dividers, desks, file cabinets, etc., were between
$10,000 and $20,000. Due to the high cost for the conversion, the idea was
dropped.
Wolfsteller noted that a quote was recently obtained from Marco Business
Products for only (freestanding workstation dividers at a total coat of
approximately $3,200, which would include a partition for the building
inspection office.
Council discussed the proposal and questioned to what extent the dividers
would actually reduce the noise level. In addition, concerns were raised
regarding the possibility that the dividers as proposed would make it difficult
for the clerical staff to view customers entering city hall.
Page 8 0
Council Minutes - 10/14/96
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND
SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF ONE
PARTITION FOR THE BUILDING INSPECTION OFFICE AND ONE PARTITION
TO BE PLACED BETWEEN THE TWO CLERICAL EMPLOYEES WHO
REQUESTED WORKSTATION PARTITIONS. Motion carried unanimously,
I.,.�.•,
.• , , ,
Public Works Director John Simola reported that during the previous budget
meeting, City Council requested additional information on the possible
purchase of heavy duty snow removal equipment for the sidewalks and
pathways. Rather than wait for the neat budget meeting, City staff received
a request from the Parks Commission and the Monticello Community
Partners to bring this issue to the Council in the hopes of getting equipped as
soon as possible to clear the pathways this winter.
Simola noted that the most suitable piece of equipment found for snow
removal and maintenance on sidewalk and pathway systems was a 100 -
horsepower 4 -wheel drive articulated tractor, which could handle several
attachments for year-round usage. Simola requested that Council consider
advertising for bids for this equipment specified with a snow blower and an
option to purchase a V plow and sand/salt spreader for the rear. In addition,
he recommended that the unit be specified for a deep reduction transfer case
for use of a blacktop cold planer to be used for blacktop patching operations.
A price of $64,000 was estimated for the tractor with snow blower, $6,000 for
the deep reduction transfer case, $4,000 for the sand/salt rear -mounted
spreader, and $2,300 for the V plow, for a total of $76,300, excluding sales
tax.
It was the view of Councilmember Herbst that many residents were excited
about the pathway system and would use it all year. In addition, clearing
the pathway in the winter may discourage use by snowmobiles.
Councilmember Stumpf suggested that the City try to discourage
snowmobiles from using the pathway by posting "no snowmobiling" signs
before spending such a large amount of money for equipment. In addition,
Mayor Fyle noted that he was not convinced that the pathway would get
enough use in January and February to justify the equipment expense.
Councilmember Herbst then suggested that the City advertise forbids but
also authorize Simola to research other muncipalities for used equipment
and other methods for removing snow.
Page 9 0
Council Minutes - 10/14/96
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND
SECONDED BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS AS SPECIFIED,
RESEARCH THE COST OF USED EQUIPMENT, AND RESEARCH OTHER LESS
EXPENSIVE METHODS FOR REMOVING SNOW FROM THE PATHWAY.
COUNCIL WELL REVIEW THE INFORMATION AT ITS NOVEMBER 12 MEETING.
Voting in favor: Clint Herbst, Shirley Anderson, Tom Perrault, Opposed:
Brad Fyle, Brian Stumpf. Motion passed.
12. Review of bida for a 150-horsepawer diesel -powered snow blower for street
rinaniny and widening. and congidpratinn ofpj+rchasp,
Public Works Director John Simola reported that at the September 4
meeting, City Council authorized advertisement for bids for replacement of
the large snow blower that fits on the front of the City's cat loader, which is
used for clearing snow from Broadway and for street widening. The City
received one bid of $59,745.44 from MacQueen Equipment, including trade-in
and sales tax.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND
SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO AWARD THE PURCHASE OF A NEW SNOW
BLOWER TO MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT OF ST PAUL, MINNESOTA, FOR
$59,745.44, INCLUDING TRADE-IN AND SALES TAX. Motion carried
unanimously.
„ • ��VrMl
Assistant Administrator Jeff O'Neill reported that Joe Merchak recently
resigned from the Chief Building Official position and that City staff was
concerned that advertising the opening under the current pay would not
result in finding an employee with the experience needed to do the job. Only
seven individuals applied for the position when first created in February of
1996, three of which were interviewed, Staff noted that a high level of
experience is needed to successfully fulfill the expectations of the position;
therefore, the job description should be amended to require extensive (6.8
years) experience, which would result in moving the position from grade 11
to grade 12. Raising the grade would result in a pay range of $33,742 to
$42,177, a 6% increase in the position's pay. In addition, staff recommended
that the overall salary structure for City employees be amended by adding
step 7 in order to maintain a competitive salary structure.
O'Neill then reviewed a building inspection department salary survey of
other communities and noted that many communities issuing a similar
number of porn -tits no Monticello have a higher pay range for the Chief
Page 10 0
Council Minutes - 10/14/98
Building Official position. In addition, ONeill noted that St. Peter recently
raised the starting salary for Chief Building Official to $38,000 due to the
amount of turnover they had experienced.
Councilmember Herbst suggested that the position be advertised again under
the current pay range to see if more than seven applications would be
received. In addition, it was his view that the current pay structure was
competitive and that it was not necessary to add step 7.
Mayor Fyle agreed with maintaining the current pay structure but suggested
that the City consider contracting the duties for the entire building
department much like we contract with PSG to run the treatment plant. The
current Building Inspector could then perform duties currently not being
completed such as zoning code and public nuisance enforcement.
It was the view of Councilmember Stumpf that adding a 7th step to the pay
structure could result in better employees if administered properly. He
pointed out that achieving the 7th step would not be guaranteed for any
employee and would have to be approved by the Council. In addition, it was
Stumpf a opinion that raising the Chief Building Official wage could make a
big difference in getting an experienced employee, and the City could avoid
having to pay for schooling and excessive training time.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND
SECONDED BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON TO ADJUST THE MINIMUM
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL AND INCREASE THE
POINT VALUE AS APPROPRIATE, WHICH WOULD RAISE THE POSITION FROM
GRADE 11 TO GRADE 12. MOTION INCLUDES NOT ADDING STEP 7 TO THE
PAY STRUCTURE AT THIS TIME. Voting in favor. Brian Stumpf, Shirley
Anderson, Tom Perrault. Opposed: Clint Herbst, Brad Fyle. Motion passed.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
Karen Doty
Office Manager
Page 11
Council Agenda - 10/28/96
jiIIII .,T..:,.. „ �:. T
,) M74 Mr- .r,.N , 1 1
Marilyn Gartner, Promotions Director for the Monticello Mall Merchants
Association, has applied for the mall's annual license to have Chuck's
Amusements operate a carnival at the mall next spring. The dates requested
for the carnival license are from May 28 through June 1, Wednesday through
Sunday, for approximately 5 days. The Mall Association has obtained this
carnival license from the City for the past few years.
The Merchants Association is also again requesting that the fee established
within our ordinance for a carnival at $100 for the first day and $50 per day
thereafter be waived The Merchants Association considers themselves a
nonprofit organization established for the promotion of the mall and,
therefore, should be exempt. The Merchants Association has also indicated
they will provide a certificate of insurance from Chuck's Amusements
indicating that the operator has liability insurance in effect at the time the
carnival is to operate.
Enclosed with the agenda you will find a listing of the days and hours of
operation that the amusement park will be run from Wednesday, the 28th of
May, through June 1, 1997.
Approve the issuance of a 5 -day carnival license to the Monticello Mall
Merchants Association and waive the daily fees by recognizing the
Association as a nonprofit group.
Do not approve the license.
The staff' is not aware of this carnival operation causing any problems as far
as city regulations are concerned over the past three years. Since the Council
has determined in the past that the Mall Association was a nonproflt group,
it is assumed we would continuo to waive the daily license fees also.
Copy of letter requesting license approval.
Date: October 7,19%
To: C"V or Monticello
From: Marilyn Canner
Promotions Director
Re: Chuck's AmusemenL%
I a regards to Chuck's Amusement at the Monticello Mall we are requesting the
following ror approval:
1. Fee to he waived (as has been done In the past)
2. Approval of Carnival to run May 28 -June 1, 1997 with the following hours:
Wed- I'hurs: 3.9:30 I'M
Fri 2.10:30 PNI
%at I lam -10:30 IM
Sun noon -6 Pl1I
Chuck's Amusements will set up Wednesday, May 28 am begin clean-up anytime
after 6 PM on Sunday, June 1. They will supply two portable sanitation units and
garbage removal. Their main supply trucks will he parked In the hack of the Mall w)
im not to Interfere with prime Irontal parking spaces. A Certiftcale of insurance will
be rated to the City of Monticello from Chuck's Antuutnent's canter.
If you have Questions, please call me at (612)682.$061.
i /0
Council Agenda - 10/28/96
,, MMMM
•, / , Y' 1 ,)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The City Council is asked to adopt the enclosed resolution calling for a public
hearing date of Tuesday, November 12, 1996. The public hearing notice shall
appear in the local newspaper as required by the Minnesota Statutes. The
TIF Plan for TIF District No. 1-21 was distributed to the local taxing
jurisdictions on October 10, 1996, allowing 30 days for the taxing
jurisdictions to make written comment.
The boundary of TIF District No. 1-21, an Economic District, is Lot 1,
Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park Second Addition. The Estimated
Minimum Value (EMV) of the improvements is $225,000 with an annual
Estimated Captured Ta: Capacity of $8,120. The life duration of the district
is 11 years, and the HRA will receive its first tax increment payment in July
1999.
T.J. Martin, Inc., is a Minnesota corporation with equal ownership between
Carl, Eric, and Dennis Bondhus. T. J. Martin, Inc., will lease to Lake Tool,
Inc., a tool shop which builds plastic injection molds. Five new jobs are
projected to be created within two years at a wage range of between $40,000
to $60,000 per job annually.
Again, the City Council is asked to consider adoption of the enclosed
resolution calling for a public hearing. Said public hearing scheduled for
Tuesday, November 12, 1996, 7 p.m.
B_ ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
A motion to adopt a resolution calling for a public hearing for the
modification of the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project
No. 1, the modification of the TIF Plans for TIF District !Jos. 1-1
through 1.20, and approving the TIF Plan for the establishment of TIF
District No. 1.21.
A motion to deny adoption of the resolution calling for a public
hearing.
A motion to table any action.
Council Agendu . 10/28/86
C_ STAFF F..OMMFNDATION:
Stag' recommends alternative action # 1.
D_ SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the resolution for adoption; Public hearing notice and map for
publication.
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY ON THE
MODIFICATION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CENTRAL
MONTICELLO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1.21.
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Monticello ("Authority')
administers the Central Monticello Redevelopment Project ("Project") pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section
469.001 to 469.147 and Sections 469.174 to 469.179 (collectively, the "Acts'); and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined to consider a modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the
Project and a proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan ("TIF Plan') for the proposed Tax Increment Financing
District No. 1-21 and to hold a public hearing thereon in accordance with the Acts:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council') of the City of Monticello.
Minnesota(the'City'), as follows:
I. Public Hearing. This Council shall ince t on Tuesday. November 12, 1996, at approximately 7:00
p.m., to hold a public hearing on the proposed modification of the Central Monticello Redevelopment Project
and the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1.21 (an economic development district), all
pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047, inclusive, as amended;
and Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179, inclusive, as amended, in an effort to encourage the
development and redevelopment of certain designated areas within the City: and.
2. Notice of Hearina: Filing of Promm . The City staff and consultants are authorized and directed
to modify the Redevelopment Plan and create the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Plans') and to forward
documents to the appropriate taxing jurisdictions including Wright County and Independent School District
No. 882. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the hearing, together with an appropriate
map as required by law, to be published in the official newspaper of the City not later than 10 days prior to
November 12, 1996 and to place a copy of the Plans on file in the Clerk's Office to City Hall and to make such
copy available for inspection by the public.
Dated:
ADOPTED:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
N1Ma%.OTAAKXiW. %TFI-2lCn'CALL$tED
506A-
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF MONTICELLO
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Monticello, County of
Wright, State of Minnesota, will hold a public hearing on November 12, 1996, at approximately 7:00 p.m. in
the City Council Chambers in the Monticello City Hall, 250 Eau Broadway, Monticello, Minnesota, relating
to the modifications to the Redevelopment Plan for the Central Monticello,Redevelopment Project No. 1, and
the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-21 and the adoption of the Tax Increment
Financing Plan relating thereto (collectively, the "Plans'), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001
through 469.047 and Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179, inclusive, as amended. Copies of the
Plans are on file and available for public inspection at the office of the City Administrator at City Hall.
The property proposed to be included in Tax Increment Financing District No. 1.21 is located at
approximately Dundas Road and Dundas Circle within the City of Monticello. The properties proposed to be
included in Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-21 encompass all property and adjm=1 and interior roads
and rights-of-way as found indicated by the parcel identification number listed below:
Parcel Number
PID #155-060-001010
Subject to certain limitations. tax increment from Tax Increment Financing District No. 1.21 may be spent
on eligible uses within the boundaries of Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. 1 as shown on the
attached map.
(INSERT MAPS of Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. 1,
and Tax Increment Financing District No. 1.211
All interested persons may appear at the hearing and present their views orally or prior to the meeting in
writing.
Dated , 1996
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF MONTICE.UO. MINNESOTA
City Administrator
N WtNN30TAWONnCCL%TWI-21VVBKEAY.NOr 5786
\, �t�,.` P7,�..��r•� �rJ •L. l�'.ti "�...--.-Il.•f:; `� l�.`L✓i�•=-'--'� •rr 11-r.L •{�_�I _.
' t �''•' f it `.�I `1, f=- T
•\(. t_': .i "i '� ' `tiia.-'�C.+�'.�•''•;` .� \ •• 7•:ti.,,. w ... .Yy,•1. 1 ..
fY'
f P ... p�„•.•.a'vsfl.'rt•.1 .{1 n, l..,. •'`• t. '*"' tq• srts•
``��i,• (R�'t.l'il q. .r a %,1:R:11rrixi.l`"'v7;•',:.
j:)111 ,+ ._[ ; ? 1 • !,j w ts•11 h..�irsl. t r•.a 11.•u«.1.1
t• `i \• AO •1. . f J:T'j�.l \ 1 y 1 . ,.Y•(4.1D..IP •u.W.1
'; K .•.1 «•- ♦ \d•' .., •1 �. •-r0 01Im.1,13 1111 -duMl o...•. r.w•,1
', t •• v i l,� ,i\, �- a, �. ,. AI \ P 1 �. '� C" I %A 111 01131,1.... A. • 16-1.1
•'� •\ _ !, •, t •M. a4e1 .:•• r.`,.. ,F �.wi" . {,• .'.rr-1/ i. . 8*w..Y1..r
ji
711
�' I �•�:t.j• � •SAI• \� � t 1 / ll.it .'I.ul �.
• f'..... ItR/ .. 'r Aa, t'rh,, ���-- s1t:.I.. III
" � 1 -•
Annexation Study '� -`' . i•� '':I ,�,,� "Y %coq „� �'•1
City of Monticello ; �. _ :A� •. f, g rri1. `.
.'` i1r1'f:DuHY "M
"Sole,
.•}. rS.. .i �� •� •'.. �r• � .
1::} �1" .• rrI 1 Cv, �'~ •raw !� i�01 Y5'=t•,'.
l4Ahling Toning c a t ..0 ? i a.'�'j •• , ; •'I..�'�� :' 1.;
jyy77LSS,,��,.,,,..-..�,� 'ta ri��••�•���r•a.r �..'.. ....r ra �ti l..• gra—n1• i 1•i. :.
�® � ••asrmw'� .
edevelops
Re
�dll�nl are& Central Monticello
Redevelopment Project
City of Monticello
County of Wright
State of Minnesota
1. �.'a'�: ��r'e I ��/ t/ I / � «�•' f' ,�/\� � � �
• 1, : ,. � /{ , � ti / � �'
tip
City of Monticello
County of Wright
• „ ,... � ... ..,y..: ::.' A t,<.: :iii. ,; u o^.
State of Minnesota
Lot
1� ' I ' •�
� '�'\\ r.,r..,.._,�,,t,..r \•\� t' Proposed Tax Increment
Financing District No. 1-21
0
Council Agenda - 10/28/96
5C. Consideration of ehan_gg ord -r A2 nnd finial oa=ent on Prosect 99&
01C- Dundas Road/Fallon Avenue impmvemeIIta--mnnndale
Contracting, B.W., J.S.I --
CHANGE ORDER #2
During the construction of the Dundas/Fallon improvement project, several
issues resulted in added costa to the project which were outside the original
contract. These three issues are noted on the attached change order
attachment and are issues that were resolved during the final quantity
discussions with the contractor. This change order increases the total
contract by $5,740.19; however, the actual construction cost is $3,626.55 less
than the total contract including this change order. This reduction is due to
some reduced or eliminated quantities and $1,845.08 will be charged to other
funds.
Approve change order #2 for Project 96 -OIC at a cost of $5,740.19.
It is the recommendation of the City Engineer that Council approve the
change order as noted in alternative #1, which will address all final
construction costs.
FINAL PAYMLWr
Annandale Contracting, Inc., was awarded the Dundas/Fallon Avenue Street
and Utility Improvement Project in May of 1996. The project has been
completed. The original contract price on the project was $101,790.51. The
total construction cost is $118,802.73. To date, we have paid $89,022.74,
leaving a balance due the contractor of $29,779.99.
The difference between the actual construction cost and estimated
construction cost is $17,012.22, which was related to the two change orders
for the extension of the 12 -inch water main to Chelsea Road. A portion of the
increase, $1,845.08, was for extra materials and will be charged to other
ffinds. This will leave a total construction cost of $116,957.65.
Council Agenda - 10/28/96
Authorize final payment to Annandale Contracting for the
Dundas/Fallon Avenue Street and Utility Improvement, Prqject 96 -
OIC, in the amount of $29,779.99.
Do not authorize final payment to the contractor.
C_ S'T'AFF DZCOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the City Engineer and Public Works Director
that the City Council authorize final payment to Annandale Contracting as
outlined in alternative 81.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of change order M2 and attachment; Copy of final payment request.
S
t
� �nvan�m�onwrm
M
CHANGE ORDER
Change Order No. 2
City Project No. 96-01C
Project Dundas/Fallon Street and Utility Improvements WSB Project No. 1022.01
Owner. City of Monticello
---- —Annandale
Date of Issuance: 10123198
-- — — — —
Contractor. Contracting
Engineer. WS8 8 Associates, Inc.
You are directed to make the following changes in the Contract Documents' description:
Connect to watermain at Chelsea Road and Dundas Road.
Install HDPE storm sewer at pipeline supply driveway.
Furnish and supply hydrant and gate valve.
Purpose of Change Order.
Provide payment for miscellaneous items to complete the project
Attachments: (list documents supporting change)
1. Itemized List of Quantities
2. Description of items.
CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE
CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Price:
Original Contract Completion Date:
$101,790.51
August 1, 19%
9 lous Change Orders No. _J_ to No. _—_
Net Change from Previous Change Orders:
$14,898.58
-
None
Contract Pnce Prior to This Change Order:
Contract Completion Date Prior to This Change Order.
$118,889.09
August 1, 19913
Net Increase of This Change Order.
Net Increase of Change Order.
$5,740.19
4 -
Contract Price Wlth All Approved Change Orders:
Contract Completion Date With Approved Change Orders:
$122,429.28
August 1, 1998
Recommended By:I
Approved By.
--- - •
Bret A. Weise, P.E.
-
WSB 8 Associates, Inc.
Annandale Contracting
Engineer
Contrectw
Approved By;-_, , 1 Approved By:
Date of Council Action:
iC>I-t
w - _
October 28, 19%
Cly Engineer City Administrator
t
� �nvan�m�onwrm
M
a
Attachment to Change Order No. 2
OundaslFallon Street and Utility Improvements
City of Monticello
Item Spec.
No. No. Description
54 STD SPEC CONNECT TO WATERMAIN
55 STO SPEC INSTALL HDPE STORM SEWER
56 STD SPEC FURNISH HYDRANT 8 GATE
VALVE
DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS:
Dundas)Fallon Street b Utility Improvements
City Project 9"1C
WSS Project No.1022.01
Itemized List of Quantities
City Project No. 96-01 C
WSB Project No. 1022.01
54 Connection to watermaln: The existing watermain stub located at Chelsea Road had not been
reduced to a 12" size as was originally anticipated. Consequently, It was necessary to obtain the
necessary appropriate fittings to complete the connection. The noted lump sum cost includes the
additional work associated with the installation and the additional material necessary to complete the
installation.
55 Install NDPE storm sewer. The sanitary sewer Installation proposed along Fallon Avenue directly
conflicted with the driveway and the culvert for Pipeline Supply Company, which was just moving In to
their facility when the constriction was Initiated. It was originally anticipated that the property owner
would install the culvert following the sanitary sewer installation, however, the developer later requested
that the City contractor complete the installation.
55 Furnish 12" gate valve and hydrant: In order to meet the contractor's schedule for constniction of the
additional 12" watermain to Chelsea Road, the contractor needed to order materials in advance of the
design being completed. During the design, it was determined that we could reduce the number of
valves and hydrants Chet had been estimated on the stretch of construction by one each. Because the
contractor had the materials on hand at this time, and would have had to pay a restocking charge, it was
decided the City would purchase those materials. The hydrant has been retained by the Monticello
Water and Sewer Department for a spare and the 12" gate valve was utilized on the Briar Oakes 2nd
Addition and will be reimbursed to the City. This cost should not be considered as a project cost.
Change Order No. 2 Subtotal S 5,740.19
e
SC
1' ��T�1�'.11170/tllA: Yfrl
Unit
Unit--
Price
Quantity
Total
LUMP SUM
$3,495.11
1
$ 3,495.11
LIN FT
$10.00
40
$ 400.00
LUMP SUM
$1,845.08
1
$ 1,845.08
54 Connection to watermaln: The existing watermain stub located at Chelsea Road had not been
reduced to a 12" size as was originally anticipated. Consequently, It was necessary to obtain the
necessary appropriate fittings to complete the connection. The noted lump sum cost includes the
additional work associated with the installation and the additional material necessary to complete the
installation.
55 Install NDPE storm sewer. The sanitary sewer Installation proposed along Fallon Avenue directly
conflicted with the driveway and the culvert for Pipeline Supply Company, which was just moving In to
their facility when the constriction was Initiated. It was originally anticipated that the property owner
would install the culvert following the sanitary sewer installation, however, the developer later requested
that the City contractor complete the installation.
55 Furnish 12" gate valve and hydrant: In order to meet the contractor's schedule for constniction of the
additional 12" watermain to Chelsea Road, the contractor needed to order materials in advance of the
design being completed. During the design, it was determined that we could reduce the number of
valves and hydrants Chet had been estimated on the stretch of construction by one each. Because the
contractor had the materials on hand at this time, and would have had to pay a restocking charge, it was
decided the City would purchase those materials. The hydrant has been retained by the Monticello
Water and Sewer Department for a spare and the 12" gate valve was utilized on the Briar Oakes 2nd
Addition and will be reimbursed to the City. This cost should not be considered as a project cost.
Change Order No. 2 Subtotal S 5,740.19
e
SC
1' ��T�1�'.11170/tllA: Yfrl
&Amdates, Inc.
October 23, 1996
350 Westwood Lake Office
8441 Wayzata Boulevard
Minneapolis, MN 55426
612-541-4800
FAX 541.1700
BA mmducadt. P.E
Bm A. Wcin. P.E.
Pan R Wdtmbri%PM
Domid W. Stam. P.E
Ronald B. tarn. P.E
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Monticello
P.O. Box 1147
Monticello, NIN 55362
Re: Dundas Road and Fallon Avenue
Street & Utility Improvements
City of Monticello Project No. 96-01 C
WSB Project No. 1022.00
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
Enclose are four (4) copies of Final Construction Pay Voucher No. 2 for the referenced project in
the amount of $29,779.99. We recommend final payment subject to receipt of the following items:
1) Satisfactory showing that the contractor has complied with the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes 290.92 requiring withholding State Income Tax and;
2) Evidence in the form of an affidavit that all claims against the contractor by reasons of the
contract have been fully paid or satisfactorily secured.
Pit= make payment to Annandale Contracting, Inc., 7747 County Road 5 NW, Annandale. MN
55302.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Ina
-3,& ).�'-
Bret A. Weiss, P.E.
City Engineer
Enclosures
c: Tom Bose, City of Monticello
Rick Wolfsteller, City of Monticello
Wade Smith, Annandale Contracting, Inc.
5CG
Infrastmeture Enginem Plannm
EQUAL Of"IRTILSIN r.MPLONTa
CONSTRUCTION PAY VOUCHER
ESTIMATE VOUCHER NUMBER: 2 DATE
Ocmber 27, 1885
WSB PROJECT NUMBER: 1022.00 PERIOD ENDING:
October 27, 1888
PROJECT: OUNDAS ROAD AND FALLON AVENUE STREET S UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF MONTICELLO PROJECT NO. 96-01C
CONTRACTOR: ANNANDALE CONTRACTING, INC.
7747 COUNTY ROAD 5 NW
ANNANDALE, MN 95702
- -
CONTRACT DATE: MAY 21. 19M WORK STARTED:
JUNE, 1888
COMPLET10N DATE: AUGUST 1, 1988 WORK COMPLETED:
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $101,790.51
TOTAL ADDITIONS $20,878.77
TOTAL DEDUCTIONS $0.00
TOTAL FUNDS ENCUMBERED $122,42918
TOTAL WORK CERTIFIED TO DATE
$118,502.77
LESS RETAINED PERCENTAGE 0.00%
50.00
LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS
$58.022.74
TOTAL PAYMENTS INCL THIS VOUCHER 5118,502.77
' BALANCE CARRIED FORWARD $0.00
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT THIS VOUCHER
SjS,,gg
APPROVALS
In aeordanoe with Seal obsenatim as p bmsd In a6pdance wb YWtnby standards, and buo on our prolaaUmtal oorAon, Oro matabb trotalled
ere eWabaory ald the work t>< M performed N aCAeldan0 wqh the ptam afd ePO�Cstloq. The tow wok b u*rwied m be 100. %ool, ted
at of October 27, 1998. We hereby wom u mnd payment of Oda wuoha.
Signed'—
Camwttbn Obaervsr PrajerJ Managerlt ngutw
ANNANDALE CONTRACTING, INC.
TNe fe m oertd'y SIW m the test of my lugwbdge, trdornutlOrt, x110 ONef, SM t>uanUOp and vaUp al woA tertylad Main b e fetr apprmrimats aetlmeb
for the period covered by thte vowlvir,
convector
Dote:
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Cho" by:
Dab:
Signed:
T81e:
Approved for payment
Audwized RepteaarLtive
Dab:
-fd io
VOUI'IIF.N DF I'AII. IT"'
I OF )
PR(OSF./TT'ITI.E: I DIINDAS ROAD 7 FALLON AVENUE
.. !/
7111'
11}01 'MMM. NO.: 1023.00
IlVFF.:
10125796
A.NANOARY SI. ER
W. %p-
Cmlr.rl
C. plrlyd I hb
.%ImlY
T..I T. Dale
N.. N. rk-ig 11..
Q-1117
I l.b
O.0 ►rke
TOal Prke
QR..Hilt
I'0d s
Q, Ili.,
I0.1 s
I .i11 41-1. I'PYI' YIPF SI WIR\IM 16
11 I
I.INII
f..
NOT.
000
In (XD
511X1
1,4111011
f 1b11111- b• PIC MPF SI.WI R SIMlh
101 I]
I.IN n
ton,
S-1
41 011
$161`()
45 110
$655 (111
3 .b21111 uYYu I V PVF' PIPF 11111 N IDI 15
010 I
IINn
f20W
$10, -
4150
SWOII
9411511
SIMF10(M
4 2.213111.- NII'IMSIRIM'I MANIA.(
1 i
IN"
4110.
fla.
(100
$01111
1111
$I low
5 1.11 W1.A. IU•.4. MV.1F
I
"1 11
{I..
{1..
0111
WOO
11X1
sU., M
1, 2.21X111.... 10'. b'P\'I.11
1 I
Iwli
{(IOW
$1.1.
000
So (M)
111(1
13 F0101
7 1611 fol INYW SIANDARU41' INA SANITARY SLWI R 411(0. 101
1 I
IAIli
I 41110.
N.IfOnl
UIMI
$OIYI
11X1
$4,111 FO
1 1b11 X6IXUW I:VI RA A I' INA M 11171 RIF OVI R IO
5 I
I.M CT
I wl.
{1W 50
1113
($1125)
111
5117111
V Mll3 AXuu IIWNI CI 101\ISI I41i SANITARY SI MIO11:
1 I
FAI
I Yf.
Ll.
OIM1
$0(11
I IN)
SBS IN
IO SIO fF (' 1'11111 CI TUI \ISIINIi5AN11 A\1'1141X1111
2 I
J'll
1 H
Mam
fI,2W.
01`()
$01111
2W
II,2w IN:
II SIU {NII' r1'IV1]IWi{}NITARYa L
91O
LIN"
{0 if
i/1110
00(1
$00 0
OW
$O IMI
'14IlAl. MIII D111.E A•;.3 IRFACi: 1M►ROVEMEN",
I
_
{17011W
S17 15
$26,42530'
11. WA1 ERMAIN
Ilrl. nprc.
2'41.IrM
1'aapWed 16H
RI..1►
W,1 I. 1"1e
17-1
N.. n. lk-Hpa..
p...11IIr
IIIN
11.11 ►rte
10.1 Prke
IJII..nRl
10.1
IhIUNR)
lad
12 I ITR MAIN 11117111 IRIHI 1'110
IINil
I {1110
411 NIW
1111X11
$17761:)1
M14f1 TNI
1142(171YII
`el1.,Iu41.lI1'w'A
II I 1.0}Ulnuullo'W AIIR 4AIH INNl411R1 w1'1 S)
NY7
IIN 1'1
I {II 111
{a 14. u1�
O/Ml
1,01111
41301X1
1tl!)'121M1
4 I
Al1. M}IN INM'1111111(1N1'I fl
Ill
I.IH I'1
` tl}fl
4),61111
11(X1+
$(I III)
I-bIN,
$2,SI/M
I 11 ]I MI Wllu.n
�h'M
I'I1'P1 MInN1 111
40
IIN I'1
YfII
{141m
5001
MI
$1/X71
16 1 ln11.2.XM
1•IINIIHN ITMIN}1111
I
1
1}I'll
{141101
{1f IO
0IMI(
UIXI+
fU1M1
II1111
UI(MII
17
11a11Auu
SMI .1Yu1I11111RAN1
IT IiAIl 1Al}I ANI, W.I,
I
1
I.U'll
1.411
{I .unII
{WIW
tf eul nl
1'114.
(IMI
0(.1
$IA.(N)
RAMI
41X1
(IMI
f}!MMI (NII
$W51MI I
IV
I 1u11 W.I uu+10•r�All 1'411 }'1 411171X11--1�
1UII
fle�W
thfW
UIMI
$UIMI
_
IIYI
$76}(X11
111 1 1111 XI)n.YY,lb'IiA 11'VAI VI' - IMI\
I
I
TAI 11
N1a.l
11,111.1
(IMI
HIV (M)
If IMI
Sl l}2 u1
21 1 IA111UW.0 INY (III IUIN.1, 1INIn
I
II
1.1 1
IHMINI,
{OW
D.a>nI
4111XI�
SIMIMI
16151NII
$1 Iln M,
1rll.)luul 1.111 ISIIRI NI INSI'IAI..I
I
.I I
SIJIn
114.
{)fO.
IIIA,
SII IN
I/0'I
$111.1
2'� ell enlW �}IIMNII l I,,1\011.rw4111R4■}'M 1'
I
))
1}111
{I0u1�
{1.01.1
II IMI
to
IIN(
1,1U TNI
14 1 .ti11 W7 W.u11'I IIN( I T InI-IIFNIw AII.MAN1
I
1 I
I AI'1,
I 1111.
IIIIW I
00111
RI IMI (
(IMI(
$I R]IYI
1111'A1. X'11110.1./: 0• SA NI I'A R1' S/.N FN
I
I
I
Lr9OI 711
I
i111MOU
I
UII0'.02
L (TIANGF OSIMM N0. 2
Ilan Sp.T.
N.. N. I1w111pIW
41 4111 SNI 1 IMNII l i(1 Y_AII.M U`
51 41115` I INVI At 11110012NMY t1 Ml a
M _ LIUSNI 1FURNCJ111YIIRANTt UAIII \'AI VII
111'1 AI 4'II FIR ll./ -/'-II IANI:I: imm R No. 2
I,R 4`11 1111 11.
SCF
1'..Im" C.OpM.A Tbb Ala.la law 1. Ding.
llRanu/
11" 11.1t►.U. 10.1 hk. (Intaanirt '1'.ut 17a.apnt T.1.1
V01lC11 F.R DFTAI L LAST
n110fu Uwtn 100 $0930 Ion 114.1 11
.'
IIOm {q1m 40tH {`1100 101X1 Nlu lel
_IIw
11i11111K
Ion IIMII_W iM {1,1111. --0(1 Mltl -�I lal 1.5...00
' 0P 7
-T-
PROJE(TTITLE:'N- MINDAS ROAD I FALWN AVENUE
/\)
�J
1110
NASD COSIA1. NO.: 10210D
DATE:
lona 6
C.STREF:T CONSTRI K-1 ON
Item
Spee.
Color."
C-Wlktm -Mb at.ala
Taal T. Data
Na
N. 11na"tIld"
Oa.alp/
110
11.p►ek.
Taal Prk.
V.a.1111Y
'Total
O.aapnl
Taal
23
710. 1114921fD CI I:4Ra 0"'"
I
LllwralM
51,1$000
51,710.
Oml
$000
100
51,25041
26
7101 $ 0149490 SUIX-1 ADE PREPAMTION
1
ROIDSTA
SIMM
R30m
000
3(100
4s111
51500(1
27
21BIMI-ml)
11.
I.BiFl
toM
6210.
000
Sum
110000
S22BM
25
7101 f0-wo 3.A1 VANE(lILVERT
.
Imn
{lf0
2710.
Om
60 OD
6001)
S210m
24
7711 0074a0M AUGRI MTP. BASE 114335(wU
DF ILDI
5"
CU YO
00 22
/4,1.100
Om
SO00
476 Of)
$1,41122
30
71)1)114491911\'PE II EASE COL). aBXWS1H
71)
TOW
R1 at
SSo"41
23(62
$6,11561
25462
b.31161
317111
wammo TYPE. 4I WEARD1G C011RS0 YIICTI IRE
243
TUI
R3W
W%135
21541
S3.3990)
71543
5:.39501
12
7137 w74)u90 WTUMMOII3 MATERIAL RIR TM'K CMT
IM
GAL
Sim
{IMm
7000
$7000
7000
$70(11
it
2311 W.-00 ClIweFlE Man A(YrTTER 11FsKil pain
Sao
IMFI
".
53,111)0
7900
$76630
66100
$6,43110
31
710$ 101-00021 Cl MIWIN LWAVATR M
1700
cu I'D
{001
117M
BOB
$1) 00
7(000j
$71111
.15
2301$44(X9071• SPAN C M P ARCA
aIIN
FT
{lam
{INO.
000
Soon
to 00j
11,44000
16
7b1 NI4110n111•Sr4NCYP ARIA APR(.14
2
1'0011
slow
RM.
Om
%BOB
200j
S220m
131
I'll V11"ll RANI1WILIrRAP11AIS"I
1
IIIIO I
{SIM
511200
Om
Rom
0001
SOm
,11
"400 Wl Mll- PI KMANJ BARRICAOIS
2
LAC"
RSO.
swop
700
$S0000
2 W
55111100
39
n15M-wo%OCIXN) TYNE IANIN
IoM
%QYD I
RM
tZo O.
105100
52110200
101100
52/10200
1 40
2.1.WI�ma1I0-FI3TAWWWLNT(2ECUINOI
1
AftE I
RIO.
111230
065
$427$0
065
9427SO
1 41
21/1$ Mom(YI`PRFT9 OIIIYLM'AYPAVLMIXI
Il0
002 YD I
t000
{1,/70.
.1470
(%42630)
10730
5).11170
ITIITAI.
S"IF.MILE C-%-'ATERMAIN
I
tualSo
f13.41714
$12,11172
1). C11ANGI.
ORDER NO. 1
Ilan
Spec.
Cft~('mpkld
Tab al..la
Taal T. Ihl.
Na.
N. na.edvab..
Ou.11h
ISR
II.B PAn
TaMI►lin
/J,aaDkt
T.W
(p..nRl
T.lal
1[ 42
7.II V11-
5W.
11`11
51720
S".N.W
Um
RID)
5WoOl
SI 117rom41
N 42--
TUAl1. AIVI.RAW
100
IACD
%.110
%Mlm
000
won
0t011
5736UI
.a
I.. 1790.n1
J:rWAIII'SIAW1.111111111"fo
199101'IRoNo"B.'I
0000
"a"
Wa0
$19200
•54000
(S4bnll
110{0)1
UPS"
41
7411W A -M
(I.MII'I TOCNISHNONIATIRMAIN
Ion
IAC`
R1um
000
SO OD
1(K)
S2WI(X)
46
I WWII BIIl)MU9913 FAVI MI NI
1101$9$4-1111 KM'DI
7s.
SO N0
u
{won
O(al
%100
74111
16511011
47
111`11 I.n) fAI; W 11WD119M PA" W 147
]Om
IIN FT
{1M
$110.
Om
R)00
01X1
to(l()
4S
22II sm44nu A0 At (141 L" ASC. llA IIWX1)
em
Ill1D
Mtn
41 MI
Om
%000
000
Sant
149
tl11311842M 1\'PP II R NF U91Ra Ml\"IRI!
Ion
I(M
11181
1N 11
BOB
Rom
0191
WBO
1 AU
7"Iwmam I AN. 11 . FAaw 1.19)a4 MI5"ItV
Ion
119
RIW
a".7
0(00
SBO'
SOm
OM)
SD on
1 51
7111 M. aYIY pIIlwlrn lYAT(aW fi 414551'001
I.
(1U
aim
11.
Om
tom
O(Kl
f"nl
1 32
1f1\1mA1mo IfUX1NO IN IAW`
72]00
131"D
Rm
MMm
Om
21100
000
to00
31
2$11)0140000 IJ"1a11 to Am1WW`T IMIDINOI
013
ACI'
I1fp.
ISM.
it
{267 to
034
VOSS)
`7'lll'AL
S1111:1t1ILE 1)- 61ANl341JIMN NO. 1
I4ION
�
$14,2(0(X)
L (TIANGF OSIMM N0. 2
Ilan Sp.T.
N.. N. I1w111pIW
41 4111 SNI 1 IMNII l i(1 Y_AII.M U`
51 41115` I INVI At 11110012NMY t1 Ml a
M _ LIUSNI 1FURNCJ111YIIRANTt UAIII \'AI VII
111'1 AI 4'II FIR ll./ -/'-II IANI:I: imm R No. 2
I,R 4`11 1111 11.
SCF
1'..Im" C.OpM.A Tbb Ala.la law 1. Ding.
llRanu/
11" 11.1t►.U. 10.1 hk. (Intaanirt '1'.ut 17a.apnt T.1.1
1. ll'Mlury
nm 11
n110fu Uwtn 100 $0930 Ion 114.1 11
.'
IIOm {q1m 40tH {`1100 101X1 Nlu lel
_IIw
11i11111K
Ion IIMII_W iM {1,1111. --0(1 Mltl -�I lal 1.5...00
$4700119
-T-
Council Agenda - 10/28/96
•
On August 14, 1996, the City Council acted to approve the preliminary plat
of the Monticello Business Center subject to completion of certain
modifications. This is to let Council know that all but one of the adjustments
to the modifications have been adhered to. Item #3, which included the
requirement that Cedar Street alignment be adjusted to enable connection to
the Iijellberg Trailer Park frontage road, was not modified. After further
review of the alignment of Cedar Street relative to the mobile home park, it
appears that the alignment as proposed under the original preliminary plat
is actually the beat alignment because it maintains a broad separation
between State Highway 26 and Cedar Street frontage road. Under the
amendment as proposed by the City staff and Council on August 14, 1996,
Cedar Street would have swung very close to Highway 26 to match
Fjellberg's frontage road, resulting in a congested intersection at Highway
26. By maintaining Cedar Street at a greater distance from Highway 26 as
proposed under the original plat, proper distance between Highway 26 and
Cedar Street can be maintained. In the future, if the trailer park converts to
another type of land use, such use would likely be better served with the
Cedar Street alignment as proposed under the original plat. I have discussed
this matter with Kent Kjellberg. He supporta approval of the plat as
proposed.
Motion to approve the final plat subject to conditions noted by the City
Council on August 14, 1996, minus condition Q.
Motion W deny approval of the final plat.
r STAFF MRNDA l0N:
This is virtually a housekeeping matter. The only item of any controversy
could be the location of the alignment of Cedar Street. Staff recommends
alternative 4#1 and concurs that Cedar Street should remain aligned as
described in the original plat. The developer has completed all other
requirements as identified during preliminary plat approval; therefore, staff
recommends approval of the Mal plat.
Council minutes of 8/14/96; Copy of final plat.
Council Minutes - 8/14/85
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that Tony Emmerich, representing
Ocello, LLC, requests preliminary plat approval of the Monticello Business
Center plat. The plat consists of six lots, Outlots A -F, with a combination of
B-3, B-4, PZM, and BC zoning. Development of Cedar Street and subsequent
development of internal utility systems serving each outlot will be designed
and installed separately with the development of each outlot. The City will
determine the precise storm sewer trunk fee amount, review the design of the
grading plan, and collect the trunk storm sewer funds at the time of the
development of the individual outlots. Until the long-term storm water plan
is completed, the property must be developed with on-site ponding sufficient
to maintain the current rate of storm water discharge from the site.
O'Neill noted that the preliminary plat needs to be corrected to show the
necessary easements along the perimeter of each outlot, and it is also
suggested that the Cedar Street right-of-way width be increased from 60 ft to
80 ft along the area south of School Boulevard, and that the School
Boulevard right -of --way width be increased to 100 ft between Cedar Street
and Highway 25. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the
preliminary plat.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY SHIRLEY ANDERSON AND
SECONDED BY TOM PERRAULT TO APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF
THE MONTICELLO BUSINESS CENTER SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OF THE
FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS:
1. Provide all necessary easements along lot perimeters as required by
ordinance.
2. Widen Cedar Street from 60 ft to 80 ft and widen School Boulevard to
100 ft between Highway 25 and Cedar Street.
3. Adjust Cedar Street alignment to enable connection to the Kjellberg
Trailer Park frontage road.
4. Subsequent development must adhere to the trunk storm water policy
of the City.
B. On-site ponding shall be developed suficient to manage storm water
produced on site.
Motion carried unanimously with Clint Herbst absent.
Page 4 bp 9
Council Agenda - 10/28/86
Mr. Larry Hunt of Champlin, Minnesota, is in the process of purchasing the
Hawk's Sports Bar and Grill from Joe and Teresa Abbott. As part of the
transfer of ownership, Mr. Hunt has applied for the on -sale liquor license to
be transferred to his name.
City ordinances require that a public hearing be held on the issuance of an
on -sale liquor license. A notice has been published in the Monticelin limes
indicating that the Council would hold a public hearing Monday night to
consider the transfer of this license.
A background check has been completed on Mr. Hunt by the Wright County
Sheriffs Office, and there was no information available from this background
investigation that would prohibit Mr. Hunt from obtaining the license. After
closing the public hearing, the license transfer approval should be contingent
upon Mr. Hunt providing proper proof of liability insurance coverage.
After closing the public hearing, the Council could approve the
transfer of the current on -sale liquor license for Hawk's Sports Bar to
Mr. Larry Hunt.
Under this alternative, the license application will be submitted to the
Liquor Control Division for approval along with the required
certificate of liability insurance.
Do not authorize the liquor license transfer.
Based on the background investigation completed by the Sherifre
Department, Cho staff can find no reason W deny the license transfer request.
Although the City does not have any additional liquor licenses available, the
staff can find no reason why the Council would not approve this license
transfer. Since this is a public hearing, the Council may receive additional
input from the public on which to base its action.
Copy of license application.
OCT 10 '96 03:59PM CITY OF MWTICELLO P. Z/13
CITY OF MONTICELLO
LICENSE APPLICATION
This application is being submitted for the following license(s):
Set-up license _ Off -sale. non -intoxicating liquor
X On -sale, intoxicating liquor On -sale, wine
On -sale, non -intoxicating liquor _ On -sale, wine/3.2 beer
Applicant Name: L.4VTV D- AUWI Phone: &17- t ZI 7tf2lo
Applicant Address: Z BFI Md�QtlG
c . olio f- I !3531to
Social gecarity y; Date of Birth:
Driver's License M:"
Business Name �'S + Q>�GIV %1(ne'.
Buaineas AddressBlvd
WArj+1iz11n I-"
Business Phone: 00- 2R5 2470 MN. Business ID a:
i
Describe nature of business operation: .&,( I
If Corporation: Officers: L?" kM - Re51G ix , Tmzffe r
Mod, AndA"h0►t- V• F4t5dM#�.XCr'L1ot�/,l
Directors:
Do you or does your corporation, partnership, etc., currently hold any license
allowing the sale of wino, intoidcating liquor, non -intoxicating liquor or set-ups?
— Yes 5iL No
If yes: Name of Business:
Business Address:
Business Phone:
Type of License: Years Held:
LIWCAPP: IW"s to 4
GCT 10 '96 03:49PM CITY OF rhJnTICELLO
References:
Liam$ Address
Credit References (list at least one bank you do b•isiness with):
P. S/3
]2hnnp Number
r 'V ql -S-7.P 3__WZr. vYl.,Z ro p
ti ti7-ds6-a1a7 WK !07-?!!-otsc
r. AJ-Osvl q3-2-35'70
Phnne TI�pr
AW f- Sb 7?
STS �N2f%rnnlQrtnE ;t9ZMa:r,S1-. 7:IfOnjNl4 e3A7e— l:TM -2.?Q-
Amount ofinvestment, excluding land;-
(only
and:(only applicants for on -sale, intoxicating liquor must provide this information)
Have you ever been convicted of a felony or of violating the National Prohibition Act
or any state law or ordinance relating to manufacture or transportation of
intoxicating liquors? _RD
I declare that the above information is true and correct to the
9bbe-st-of may knowledge.
/
Date of Application licant ignature'�
rrrartraronutrrtaratsrtt*tarrtt*ttassrrstarrprtrarrat«tatatarrprttarrrtar
(For City Use Only)
Surety Bond Liquor Liability Insurance Certificate
Application Fee License Fee
Sheriff, Wright County Mayor
Date City Administrator
Date
LIQLICAYP: IOWS
Council Agenda - 10/28/96
Adoption o1
able bills an
. (R.W., C.S.)
The City Council is asked to adopt an assessment roll for accounts receivable
bills which are delinquent more than 60 days and to certify the assessment
roll to the County Auditor as of November 30, 1996, for collection on neat
year's real estate taxes if not paid within 30 days of this public hearing.
It is recommended that the delinquent accounts be put on an assessment roll
for certification in 1997 at an interest rate of 8% as allowed by state statute.
As in the past, if any accounts are paid within 30 days after the adoption of
the assessment roll, they can be paid without any additional interest.
The forfeit property delinquent amounts will be added to our forfeit property
listing. At such time as this property is sold and rroturned to the tax rolls,
these amounts will be added back to the property with interest accruing at
8% from the date of the public hearing.
1. Adopt the assessment roll for the delinquent charges as presented.
2. Based on public hearing input, adjust the assessment roll as required.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is staff recommendation that the Council adopt the assessment roll as
presented. All of the accounts are at least 60 days past due and have been
given proper notice of this assessment hearing and ample opportunity to pay
the accounts in full.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of resolution adopting assessment roll; Complete listing of delinquent
accounts to be certified.
RESOLUTION 96 -
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL
OF DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has
met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for
delinquent accounts receivable charges.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part
hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against
the parcels named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby
found to be benefited by the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in one (1) annual installment payable on or
before the first Monday in January 1998 and shall bear interest at the rate of
8 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution.
To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from
the date of this resolution until December 31, 1997.
3. The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of
the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such
property with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer,
except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within
30 days from the adoption of this resolution.
4. The City Administrator shall forthwith transmit a cortified duplicate of this
assessment roll to the county auditor to be extended on the proper tax list of the
county, and such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the anme
manner as other municipal taxes.
Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of October, 1996.
Mayor
City Administrator
714
V
10/71/90
155-010-055000
77.90
155-044-003040
71.96
155-044-003060
73.96
155-044-002030
21.30
155-059-001000
137.74
155-070-002120
559.00
155-070-002110
37.07
155-076-002130
27.00
%VIAL, 6
lms t9rtalt,
GRAND TOTAL, 6
1996 OELIXWM 1CW01f6 F=3IVARL6
6PSCIAL A00BOSKM CKRTIPICATIO30
(10/70/96)
Rldor Jordan (Ruby 6"s,
6tau of 101 (forfilt)
etata of 10 (forfslt)
Ruta of q (fcrfslt)
Cook Cmsttnctim
Prmtlga Rnild—
JacgOaliw Lovelle
eossnaa aartssn
056.01 (to 1» a titiad)
"9.22,
799.59 (to tm a"t to co ty Aodltor)
ADOMCM LOT/07x.' BLOCK
Original
9,10
73
Meadow Oak Rat
4
1
1(asdm Oak Ut
6
1
AaadM oak got
3
2
Aasdm Oak 4tb
6
1
Briar oak"
12
7
urs Rills 3rd
11
2
Cara Bills 3rd
13
2
Wo
Council Agenda - 10/28/96
Puhliheaying on ai
delinquent nt1lJJXJW
Auditor. (R.W., C.S.)
The City Council is again asked to adopt an assessment roll for utility billing
accounts which are delinquent more than 60 days and to certify the
assessment roll to the County Auditor for collection on next year's real estate
taxes if not paid by November 30, 1996.
The delinquent utility accounts that are included with the agenda are
accounts that are at least 60 days past due and include all new delinquents
from the last time we certified them. In addition to the delinquent amount,
the Council also previously approved the establishment of an administrative
fee of $25 per account that is added to each delinquent assessment. The
amounts shown on the enclosed delinquent utilities list include the
additional $25 administration fee for the preparation of the assessment roll.
Please note that acct 2-0123-00-00 exceeds the $600 threshhold established
by Council. Attempts are being made at this time to collect the delinquent
amount or the water could be shut off.
It is recommended that the delinquent accounts be put on an assessment roll
for certification in 1997 at an interest rate of 8% as allowed by state statute.
As in the past, if any accounts are paid within 30 days after the adoption of
the assessment roll, they can be paid without the additional interest. Atter
30 days, payments will be charged interest and can be accepted up to
November 30, 1996.
R. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Adopt the assessment roll for the delinquent charges as presented.
2. Based on public hearing input, adjust the assessment roll as required.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is staff recommendation that the Council adopt the assessment roll as
presented. All of the accounts aro at least 60 days past due and have been
given proper notice of this assessment hearing and ample opportunity to pay
the accounts in full. All utility accounts were notified that there would be an
additional $26 administrative foe attached to each outstanding balance if the
account was not paid by 4:30 p.m. on October 21, 1996.
Council Agenda - 10/28/98
Copy of resolution adopting assessment roll; Complete listing of delinquent
accounts to be certified.
10
RESOLUTION 96 -
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL
OF DELINQUENT UTILITY BILIS
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has
met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for
delinquent accounts receivable charges.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part
hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against
the parcels named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby
found to be benefited by the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in one (1) annual installment payable on or
before the first Monday in January 1898 and shall bear interest at the rate of
8 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution.
To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from
the date of this resolution until December 31, 1997.
3. The owner of the property Be assessed may, at any time prior to certification of
the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such
property with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer,
except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within
30 days from the adoption of this resolution.
4. The City Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this
assessment roll to the county auditor to be extended on the proper tax list of the
county, and such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same
manner as other municipal taxes,
Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of October, 1998.
Mayor
City Administrator
J
10/77/96 t.m QTR 2. 1096 DELO UTILITY 6, , CERTIFICATIOOS WITH LAII 04AM PAGE I
Am=t 1 RED 1 Property Utress OPT Customer Msb Cwt Name 2 OYT)0 ay 0-60 ar O rSg ay WIN ar late Total
1 Rest Due Rest 0. Past Due Part Due Marie ./Late
Car¢
00100251400 155040001020
225 RIVER ST E
1410itEI PELARSKI
5011 CEOAD LAxE ED
11.14
.00
.00
.00
25.00
11.14
M100)MOO 155010055%0
701 RIVER $7 V
PAM WITS
107 RIVER $I V
105.11
.00
.00
.00
21.00
110.11
00114110000 155010055061
I LOCUST $I
TED 1419621
1 LOCUST ST
66.11
.00
.00
.00
25.00
11.11
00100/50000 15501006XW
301 FROT ST
DICK 112
101 FROT $T v
177.0
.00
.00
.00
25.00
152.41
0010000000 155010044100
924 RIVER ST V
RAOIAEL SMIDI
121 RIM ST V
17.24
.00
.00
.00
25.00
104.24
00101310000 1$5015007140
311 RIVER $I E
DIMA KR1)SE
SII RMI $T E
a41
.00
.00
.00
25.00
117.71
NRm"IM► _ __ _
-i�91A..... u
..e., . •
__ __
_
_
_I
_
OmO017M40 ISSolm37100
ISS CR010YA1 E
PAULA RICHER
PO 801 121
11.61
.CO
.00
.00
75.00
4).61
mm000m 155010057070
141 BROADWAY E
1104411 ENTERPRISES IMC
00 601 121
45.69
.00
.00
.00
25.00
10.59
O020011001111 155010%1010
41) BLUAOVAY v
JERIIT/RECECCA MOFRSO
90 801 WI
13.22
11.17
.00
.00
25.00
161.11
MMC= 155010051020
110 VDI[ $I
RNID OR KAII 0EYMA14
00 e0s 111
120.05
.00
.00
.00
25.00
145.05
00700150000 155010%5030
113 BROADWAY v
RICIARD BENIIE
113 BRCVCIDT v
107.10
.14
.00
.14
25.00
112.10
00100110040 155020005111
IIe/N11111H.+.
1011 BDo1DUY It
80010 01y nim
1'A6FtW4oi.-
1011 BROADWAY V
91.21
.00
.00
.00
25.M
117.21
00"I"O"D 155010011110
i I
254 BRDAOVAY v
O%MI0N SIM=
.a. ...
ARM DOM am
... I
178.11
.00
.00
.40
25.00
IOt,l7
00201711000 15501D"SIIO
111 CROAOVAY v
CREATIVELY YM LTD
101 0M M[ BLVD
56.65
.00
.00
.00
15.40
11,65
002/1410000 155010035M
112 BROAOVAI V
K REM SOMMER
1152 Ism ST 96v
44.11
.00
.00
.00
23.00
61.21
00101650040 IS5015013010
$11 BR0IDWAV E
DIAMA GREE111K IN
112 BROOvty [
171."
.00
.00
.00
25.00
157.56
00100190000 155%DM7010
211 NEW ST
TOO BITZER
FO 801 212
$0.41
.00
.00
.M
'.5.00
IS.47
001011110110 155010001050
211 LINO 51
DAVID A DEBRA "SSEM
211 LDN n
14.11
.00
.00
.00
25.00
111.91
00714140014 155010"1090
411 KD ST V
CIRT15 A DAILWE "OCE
PO 801 212
50.21
.00
.00
.00
25.00
15.21
M7MII011111 IS501D0)m9D
111 ILD 61 V
RCBERT A Y4O/E C%
q 001 1711
16.11
.00
.00
.00
IS.00
60.51
OmM9MOM 155010010100
IN IRD ST E
GERALD 90RSTEBY
loBol 1011
42.01
.M
.00
.0
25.00
11,01
00/40110040 15501=5030
113 4TH $T [
IMOT NCCLA0511
PO 601 IIP
111.00
.00
.00
.00
75.00
01.01
0%14141440 ISMISM1020
14 ATM IT [
WAY7[ Col
101 4TH It E
1%.15
.14
.00
.00
25.00
111.15
0050011oDm 1$501=01001
112 IN 51 v
JON lnamI
11420 AMTOU AYR w
10.69
.00
.00
.14
n.m
43.99
0064DHMM 155012142010
1221 6AIDr LA
CUR9fMT RESIDET
Ins SMO/ LA
".II
.00
.00
.M
Ism
11.11
00/01350040 IWOMOA2M
112) RIVER $1 v
II 11rrMT VOit
1171 RIVER a V 110
27.11
.00
.00
.00
7S.m
67.01
0OI"IIo000 155021004050
100 MATTIRY CID
GUM PLATE
to DCII 271
12.41
.00
.00
.M
25.00
124.18
0010715/400 155071002030
1607 RIVER IT v
IIWI FEW t'AI
1102 RIVET 17 v
90.41
6.12
.00
1.17•
75.00
".48
OMmNJ'm ISHISC31114
111 MIILCREIT R)
64141 THIELOI
111 HILLCIEfT RD
100.21
.M
.00
.00
25.00
71.20
0%00460000 155024001%D
184 RIVER 51 v
WV IE=
ISM RIVER $1 V
$1.14
.00
.00
.00
76.00
11.14
MI01196mm 161500147207
1121 CEDAR Ii
AIDELA VOLT"
1141 COD AK
11,41
.00
.00
.14
25.00
111.49
00101020100 ISM00142401
RIDS %10AOD Dt I
L 1 v &'.NATES
I LEE PARIS
21.65
.0
.00
.00
25.40
41.65
00107110000 15501114 to 10
101 DONS PARK %
OSTI NOT01111
PO B01 111
100.41
.M
.00
.00
25.03
114.4
o4mum" 1550/1001180
III 11YIK LOGIEY 0R
JEREMY KAIEEtk It
111 KEVIN IOQET o0
107.11
.00
.00
.00
73.40
132.19
0%mit= 155018001180
111 JEW LICFERI 01
IIOLAm L C7AMr7
'I) JEM LEEFERT 011
123.11
.co
.00
.w
28.00
150.71
0%01010001 %5076001010
IM W" ILVOD 90
STEVEN VDIGI
in KEVIN LUICAEV OR
u.81
.40
.00
.40
n. Do
19.4
O1120183= ISSO=1010
110 MARDI ELVOD to
JAKS JCMF.OI
121 WAR41N ELIOID RD
119.01
.00
.00
.00
75.00
144.17
0 IDINOM WOOD=
100 KDW LA
JMRI 110.Em
RIR HEDIVM LA
17.011
.00
.00
.m
".M
114.4
mM1IU= %30)140)050
112 KOW LA
LARRY METCALF
112 MEDOX LA
$1.71
.40
.00
.14
25.00
11.21
=214=3 IS501,M010
105 CRCCUS lA
JIM A KARL MILV"
Its CROOK LA
0.26
.00
.00
.14
".14
11.23
0730151000 ISsithoo m
107 CIMOS CID
TDIA Wx U1
101 CRONY CID
110."
.00
.00
.M
21.00
%5.40
040m=31) tWIPI %050
109 CICCO CID
1. 40mCW A C. 11411'41
IN CROml CID
90.42
.14
.00
,00
H.0
111.42
OX313= I5915C71010
7I8 CMU! LA
6011 W fUl
in CRAMS LA
C0.9)
.M
.00
.M
ri.m
06.01
04000029077 I51OWN90
1% CROCUS LA
114401 OLON
III cc= LA
%.10
.M
.00
.00
IS.m
110.40
oM%o50.CO 1650=1100
210 M11" [LIWC00 m
DONALD WOOD
?to "AMM ELIC LD
90.00
.00
.00
.00
111.03
105.0
City 0 OTICELIO
10/77/96 10. .3
97; 2, 1956 OSLO U7ILITY 8111 RnTICATIO15 WITH LATE 00411E
i ` 7
Jctount I DID 1
PrLoertT A10rms
APT Customer Rae
Cult Nine 2
Ovr10 aY
Ovr60 aY
Ovr90 aY
Ow120 Div
Late
Total
I
Post D.
Past Due
Past Due
Peet Due
Charge
./Late
CDs9e
00101070000 155035001110
221 IMRL'IN ELWOD RD
KATIE LJAJREKE
225 AUYIN ELYOm M
75.19
.00
.00
.00
75.00
IDO.11
0010L110IDo IS503S001130
211 IMRL'IN ELWOOD RD
CXY NOGLM
211 NARVIK ELVn RD
76.119
.00
.00
.00
25.00
101.12
00901260000 155011001070
Ill KENM1 LA
JAWS CRLETTE
141 NEDIM U
179,01
.00
.00
.00
75.00
204.07
00101260000 155031004010
135 MDIw LA
KENETR ROMM
125 KEDPIW LA
77.71
.00
.00
.00
75,00
17.71
00101100000 ISS031001050
109 NEDUM LA
DAVID/"(E FaENSKT
101 NFOW LA
79.91
.00
.00
.00
25.00
106.91
00101120000 155015006020
215 PRA111E 0
DU'ANE URISOI
PO BOS 1117
15.24
AD
.00
.00
MIND
60.91
00901600000 155033001130
11 SAIOTRAP CIR
BRAD KLATT
1) SAIDTRAP CIR
16.32
.00
.00
.00
75.00
$1.12
00901120k0 1550310(11110
1 SAXTRAP CIR
B1Ll 6 e[V GRIGSBY
9 SMIDTRAP CIR
111.15
.00
.00
.00
MOD
111.95
00901970000 1550111003010
II SAM CIR
JACK VIPPER
11 EAGLE CIR
52.84
.00
.00
.00
25.00
17.61
01000190000 IS5015MO100
11) RIVEWIEV OR
ELYOOD INALAD
PO 601 611
13.15
.00
.00
.00
15.00
61.16
01002600000 155011001010
IN RIVERVIEW OR
RICK 1 LORI BLUBERO
670 RIVERVIEW DR
63.51
.00
.00
.00
25.M
0,51
r
01102840001 15505100t"0
7111 RID (YJI it
0 FLIM COW
)795 U30 S7
17.15
.00
.00
.00
MOO
11.45
0110010000 IMS002010
7111 RED OAK CIR
MOOR NARTER
2011 REO DAR CIR
91.10
.00
.00
.00
25.00
12).11
01103110000 IS545002010
2910 RED WT CIR
80001 PUKERT
710 RED OAR CID
$1.16
.00
.00
.00
25.00
84.11
V
01105510000 155"5001010
201 OAKVIEV U
JACK 6 EARA RKREN
2401 OWEEY U
19.111
.00
.00
.00
25.00
64.31
0110{))0000 155"5001"0
175 KqW 0AK OR
JULIE RERRIOIS
025 lam Wt DI
$5.17
.00
.00
.00
25.00
0.72
MIMHMI -4"
40�,u...,
..
..
..__
-
01109210000 ISSOI0003020
IIIS It" OAK DR
YILl1AN RAISIN
1115 KJDOR OM DR
62.21
.00
.00
.00
2S.END
17.21
01112170000 15500002010
SHO W RIDGE DR
ST[VE (RASE
2840 0612 IIDGF of
11.51
.00
.00
,00
Mile
109.11
01200010000 155500151a01
706 UEILBERG'S PAD
PAUL CAZSCM
2% KA11111RG'S PARK
20.0
.00
.00
.00
75.00
45.10
Q
01200020000 15550015"01
SO) URLBERG'S PAD
R(DNEY 91184
703 KALLBERG'1 PARK
11.20
.00
.00
.00
84,00
$6.20
01700070500 15550015"Ol
702 UELLBFR61 PAD
DMIA D[WSFY
712 LAUSEWS PARK
20.10
.00
.00
.00
25,00
65.90
01200/20000 15550015"62
211 UELLBERG'S PAD
PML OMIBERO
III KJELLSER0'S PARK
11,70
.00
.00
.00
WOO
56.20
•
OITOD 100000 15550015"621
210 U[IlOEP9'S PAM
MTV 84045084
162 RJEIIO[RO'1 PERK
)1.",00
.00
.00
}5.00
5{.701
01700110000 15550015"0)
111 UELLO IN'6 PAD
LWRA 11011404
211 KJELLBERG'1 PARK
20.0
.00
.00
.00
25.00
45.10
01110260D01 15551015"OI
221 U[LLBEK'S PAIL
LAUBSR5'S PAAK INC
(CA OLLI 1 DAYS 1210(15)
20.00
.00
AID
.00
25.00
15.00
V
01200510000 15550015"01
110 UELLBEK'S PAD
A SLNLU14PURGER
110 KALLBERG4 PARS
11.70
.00
.00
•00
25.00
$6.20
01200510000 15550015"62
10 UIILBER9'S PAD
YIMIN JO10.1
101 U[LLPl164 PARK
11.20
.00
.00
.00
75.00
$6.20
01700110000 ISSS001544101
S UELIBERG'S PAD
VICKI N19A
1 [JELLUIG'1 PARS
31,20
.00
.00
.00
75.00
51.20
1120010(900 15550015"01
1 U[LLOERG'S PAD
RMIOT YRIGRI
1 KAMMi'$ PARK
10.40
.00
.00
.00
84.00
15.10
01200110000 155500151101
11 UELLBERO'S PAD
TERF3IA GEAMM
Il UEILUI?G'S PAD
11.20
.00
.00
.00
75.00
U.20
012MOIt000 15550015440)
19 UIILBFK'S PARI
SAO 1 KIM 14LTON
11 UILLURG'S PAD
10.10
.00
.00
.00
25.00
15.40
01200620000 15550015"07
21 U[LLUM'S PAD
TODD PEQO1
11 U[LLDERO'S PARK
70.10
,00
.00
.00
HAD
61.90
0120010000 Isssa15"0)
I62 URLBEC'S PID
JOOI KIlA6a
101 NAILOER63 RUN
10.40
.10
.00
.00
25.00
15.10
0120011DOOt IS5500156101
100 UELLUK'S PAD
IJELLCERG'S PARK DIC
(9[0IJRD 6 WIN MDERSDI)
10.00
.00
.00
.00
75.00
15.00
01200110000 155500154462
110 UILLUK'S ►AD
LORI PALPIE1 4 RIBS KAT 110 KJELLBFRO4 PARK
10.61
.00
.00
.00
25.00
15.10
0120111,100 00 ISS50015"01
400 URLBEK'S PAM
IOL GRANT
406 U[LLGENG'1 PARI
10.40
,00
.00
.00
25.00
15.10
01"II)CD00 IS5500154462
624 UEI LB[K's PID
w HIM
601 Ul1ICFID'i PARI
70.0
.00
.00
.00
MOO
65.11:1)
012011/0000 155500151101
603 UELLDEK'9 MR
NALLUCII'S ENC
("A LACFOII)
20.10
.00
.00
.00
25.00
15.10
01701207000 15`.50015"62
MR U[LLOUG'S PAD
UTTV JACOM
101 KALLC[l6'1 P41
20.0
.00
.00
.00
25.00
15,90
01301105= ISSOUDDIO50
1090 {TAR(Do 09
DENNIS 1 SIO JEltn
5120 SlARllq 01
11.27
.00
.w
.00
25.00
10$.71
01100110000 155011003110
all 14to1 C7
LIN" [DIN
110010 MIN C2
65.95
.CO
.00
.07
M. SO
70.95
0/001/0000 155011001110
1700 INUARD LA
01MfLLE OJOEMA
1700 WILARD LA
91.51
.00
JN
.00
25.00
111."
01)00150000 IStaI10"OIO
I10 1Rll ARD LA
1214111E EPDNOI2
M11 WALAW LA
97.61
.0
.00
.00
n. C3
177.11
01100410000 1550117007010
SAO KALLARD U
JEFF we
IAO IkLARD U
$1.01
.00
.00
.00
MOD
02.01
0/011/201 MUM 10 t0
11021= IS507IM020
5111 NALL ARD LA
ME) STAPLING OR
11CNIRDOWILt OEM 1111 VALLARD it
JAWS LEMS $210 116LIID OR
S6.7S
40.71
.0
.00
.M
.00
.0
.00
25.00
25.03
10.75
11.22
CIAO
NX11O110
l
10/n/96 ..0)
DIR 2. Ip/ OEl9 UTILITY 6i
CERTIFICATIONS WITH LATE DIARQ
J )
Aocwt 1 RID 1 Property AEba,
ART Getmr Nam
Cot Ram 1
W30 Day
OON DAY O."0 Day
O•r120 Day
Late
Tota)
1
Past OCA
Part Du Pant
Doe
Pant Du
Charge
r/Late
charge
01102250000 15501100050
5360 STYLIK 00
MARNS LIMINA
5160 STARLING DR
93.91
.00
.00
.00
25.m
111.91
01)02MOZOID 155091001010
$531 STYLING DR
DENNIS ROMM
5511 STARLING 01
41.61
.00
.00
.00
15.00
71.61
01301650000 155011003100
$)10 F4C01 AVE
JILL "DIS
5110 FALCON AVE
110.13
.00
.00
.00
25.00
165.11
01107060000 155071001160
5511 FALCON AVE
IIARK Am
5521 FALCON AVE
11.25
.00
.00
.00
15.00
101.29
01103090000 15507HO21ID
5151 FALCON AVE
JACMFL 00 LIYALLI
5151 FALCON AYE
11.76
.00
.00
.00
25.00
11.26
01393290000 15WI)ODISM
2551 C4MASUC6 CT
DEBRA OSt w
9151 CAMIASW CT
61.00
.00
.00
.00
25.00
73.00
01,03)aO)w 155069007010
5010 MARTIN OR
PAM DOOM
5010 MARTIN 01
M.11
.00
.0
.00
25.00
61.12
01)0)190000 ISWBSM2020
5010 IAIIOM DR
LAURIE JIM
PO 601 121
50.51
.00
.00
.00
25.00
75.53
01)93560000 ISSOM10T0
5011 MARTIN 0t
PAIOA J OFAMM
501 MAOI IN OR
61.66
.00
.00
.0
25.00
16.66
01/0115000 155090001090
9322 RID B)([ U
DEW 1 MICELLE WIT
Un RED ROCK LA
56.11
.00
.00
.00
25.07
11.13
01601170000 I5509001060
9311 RED tlON LA
DAVID OTTEN
11M RED 0101 LA
51.01
.00
.90
.00
MIND
13.07
/001250100 155010031110
210 IMWY Y
ON BRVM IINOO
(MIKE WIN • RENTER)
10.31
.00
.00
.00
MOD
55.11
9050163000 155011001060
SIS 1AW ST
TODD NELSON
SIS RAMMY ST
20.10
.00
.00
.00
25.00
65.90
01000110300 1550A001190
169 t21AMEY 0
1 CURRENT T(N OY
151 INEMEY OR 1)
H."
.00
.00
.0
75.0
51.20
1100060100 155011001110
159 RIVERVIEY 0
1 BRIM 6 CA7MI MNI/L
IM IIYEMEV 02 11
11.61
.00
.00
.12•
25.0
$6.61
FINAL 107ALS
TOTAL
._
.
_....._
calrt m
e 1 1 a 1 E 40 Of 11111,02T
1 1 1 1 1
CITY OF WICE0.0
Council Agenda - 10/28/96
As you may recall, in January of 1996 the City Council approved a
conceptual approval of a funding package outlining fees and related
expectations associated with connection of the Kjellberg West Mobile Home
Park. City Council is asked to review the action taken in January 1996 and
determine whether or not the agreement stands given the recent inability of
the city to obtain increase in the wastewater treatment plant loading limits
in an amount commensurate with the additional flows from the west park.
Based on the meeting minutes from January 22, 1996, it appears that
Council action to allow Kjellberg to follow the 1996 fee schedule was
somewhat predicated on obtaining the PCA increase to the load limits. Now
that this increase is not going to be available, does the City Council wish to
continue to offer the same agreement to Nellbere.
If Council decides to require that Kjellberg follow the 19% fee structure, it
would amount to a $46,000 increase in the $180,000 hookup fee.
Another factor to consider is the increasing cost to provide wastewater
treatment plant capacity. Since January, 1996, the cost estimate to construct
the wastewater treatment plant has increased by $1,600,000. It could be
argued that Kjellberg should pay a higher rate because the rest of the city
taxpayers will be paying a higher rate due to the increase in the estimated
cost to build the wastewater treatment plant.
The Pollution Control Agency requested that this item be brought before the
City Council. It is important for the PCA to have this issue resolved so that
they can determine whether or not to pursue litigation. If it appears that the
connection to the city system is a dead issue, then the PCA wants to be able
to gear up to force Kjellberg to complete development of his on-site system.
R AI.T .RNATIV . ACTION :
1. Motion to extend existing agreement as is.
2. Motion to withdraw original agreement and direct City staff to
renegotinta.
Council Agenda - 10/28/96
Under this alternative, City staff would sit down with Kjellberg and
determine if there are some points of negotiation that could improve
the package for the City in light of the added coat of the wastewater
treatment plant and no additional loading.
Note mentioned in previous discussion is the impact of the added
population on state aid revenue. If annexation occurs, the additional
population (approximately 600) will result in an annual increase in
state aids for street construction in the amount of approximately
$9,000.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is our recommendation that the original agreement terms be withdrawn
because the city did not obtain additional loading limits. However we believe
that it continues to make sense to encourage hookup of the west park to city
services. Connection of the park to city services will avoid long-term
environmental problems and eliminate future state and local headaches
associated with moni' oring the operation of a huge private waste system
directly adjacent to city boundaries. The presence of this system oould, in the
long run, threaten ground water supplies for the entire city, and the
treatment facility itself could possibly emit odors that could affect city
development that will soon be on the doorstep of the west park. We should
continue to negotiate with the goal of providing wastewater treatment service
at a fair price.
January 22, 1996 meeting minutes; January 22, 1996 agenda item 03A.
12