Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
City Council Agenda Packet 08-25-1997
AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, August 26, 1897 - 7 p.m. Mayor: Bill Fair Council Members: Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Roger Carlson, Bruce Thielen 1. Call to order. 2. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held August 11, 1997. 3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda. 4. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints. 5. Consent agenda. A. Consideration of a resolution approving plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for the 1997 Pathway Project (river -walk segment). B. Consideration of a resolution approving plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for the foot bridge portion of the 1997 Pathway Project. /-A'f'J. %I' of F„r 0-4-n, nd 6. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion. 7. Public Hearing --Consideration of vacating a portion of Hennepin Street. Applicant, Monticello -Big Lake Hospital District. 8. Consideration of a zoning ordinance amendment changing the zoning district designation from R-3 to PZM, consideration of a conditional use permit allowing operation of a clinic facility, and consideration of a simple subdivision request in a P7.M district. Applicant, Monticello -Big Lake Hospital District. 9. Consideration of granting an increase to the individual pension for Volunteer Firefighter Relief Association. 10. Consideration of proceeding with construction of now animal shelter. 11. Consideration of establishing process and procedures for marketing city hall property. 12. National Guard Training Center update (verbal report). 13. Consideration of bills for the last half of August. 14. Adjournment. bEwErm REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO C1rY COUNCIL Monday, August 11,19'97 - 7 gm. Members Present: Bill Fair, Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Roger Carlson, Bruce Thielen Members Absent: None Coun©lmember Stumpf requested that the motion and second be corrected for approval of minutes. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY ROGER CARLSON AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING HELD JULY 28, 1997, AS CORRECTED. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Consideration of neling itpma to the ag n a. A. Assistant Administrator O'Neill requested that consideration of a variance request to yard setback requirements and a simple subdivision be added to the agenda. B. Councilmember Brian Stumpf requested that item #9 be added to the consent agenda. 4, f :itizena m ment.a'etif_nns. reqtimts rind coma nin e. None. g• ronsent ng n n, A. VnnsidcrnLon of approving aempr y on•saln liquor licenan • Ct Hennjy's Fall F stiv 1, Recommendation: Approve issuance of a temporary two-day on -solo liquor license to the Knights of Columbus/ St. Henrys Church for September 14 and 15, contingent upon proof of liability insurance coverage. B. Consideration ofresoliation deA' a inB a renrowntntivo nuthori'ed W nxecote AlanFiter na is once nonlicntions on behnlf of the City. Recommendation: Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Administrator to execute disaster assistance applications on behalf of the City. SEE RESOLUTION 97-39. Page I Council Minutes - 8/1V97 Congideration of a R91tdnl home occupation permit which wo +ld allow therapeutic massage in an R-1 zone_ Recommendation: Approve the request to allow a special home occupation permit based on the finding that the proposed therapeutic massage business is compatible within a residential area with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall demonstrate that all internal structure alterations that have taken place are customary to residential dwellings. 2. The special home occupation shall comply with all applicable city and state codes, including Department of Health regulations. 3. Hours of operation shall be subject to City Council approval. 4. The construction of a direct exterior entrance to the special home occupation area of the building will require approval of an amended special home occupation permit. 5. No overlapping of patrons would be allowed. 6. No signage would be allowed. 7. Number of employees is limited to the applicant only. D. ro aid ra ion nfresolutinn necepting hi g. ordering prQi pcs, and awnrelinry contract for Che Hitch School Trunk Storm Sewer Pmjec Recommendation: Award the project to Arcon Construction, Inc., in the amount of $224,554, and order completion of the High School trunk storm sewer project. SEE RESOLUTIONS 97-37 and 97.39. E. Consideration of entering into n inint powers ag=m nt for tJhn ronh6on nf Utility .i i s, Recommendation: Support the membership of the Coalition of Utility Cities and enter into the joint powers agreement and authorize budgeting for the 1998 dues recommendation of $11,115. A MOTION WAS MADE. BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS RECOMMENDED. Motion carried unanimously. None. Page 2 Z Council Minutes - 811 V97 Public Works Director John Simola reported that Mr. Charles Walters requested that Council reconsider purchasing ponding easements from owners of Lots 9, 11, and 12 in the Meadow Oak development, which uses an existing large pond as a drainage basin. The preliminary plat for the Meadow Oak project showed the elevation of the surface of the pond water at 943.4 ft above sea level; however, when the final plat was developed, drainage easements were only given to the elevation of 941. It went unnoticed that the easements for Lots 9, 11, and 12 were insufficient for even the normal water level of the pond. The construction of the pond outlet along Gillard Avenue controls the normal water elevation to approximately 942.5 ft. It was estimated that it would cost $9,830 to fill Lots 9, 11, and 12 to the 100 - year event, which was determined by OSM to be 945; however, it was later determined that it would not be practical to fill these lots. In 1996, it was proposed that the easements be purchased from the property owners at 74.9¢ per square foot; however, the Council voted at that time not to purchase the easements or fill the lots in question. City Engineer Bret Weiss noted that it is standard practice to purchase 100. year event easements for ponding. Councilmember Herbst noted that since the homes were purchased with the water at its current level and a large amount of money was spent to drain the project, if easements are purchased, they should be purchased at the normal level rather than the 100 -year event. Councilmember Stumpf noted that he would be in favor of a compromise rather than the proposed 100 -year event easement. AFTFR DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MME BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY ROGER CARLSON TO OFFER TO PURCHASE EASEMENTS ON LOTS 9. 11, AND 12 1N THE MEADOW OAK DEVELOPMENT FROM THE CURRENT EASEMENT TO THE ESTIMATED 100 -YEAR ELEVATION OF 945 AT A COST OF 74.9¢ PER SQUARE FOOT, FOR A TOTAL EASEMENT AREA OF 13,117 SQ FT AT $9,829.88. Voting in favor: Bruce Thielen, Roger Carlson, Bill Fair. Opposed: Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf. Motion carried. City Engineer Bret Weiss noted that the plans and specifications have been completed for lQein Farms 4th Addition, which is located south of School Boulevard. He also explained that one piece of property was not included in Cho Hart Boulevard or Industrial Park watershed, which could be corrected by connecting the pipe through the industrial park area into the Highway 25 system where a lift station has been proposed. Page 3 O Council Minutes - 8/11/97 AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO APPROVE THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR KLEIN FARMS 4TH ADDITION AND AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS CONTINGENT ON MAINTENANCE OF ADEQUATE DEPOSITS. Motion carried unanimously. SEE RESOLUTIONS 97-38 and 97-40. This item was added to the consent agenda. e City Council was asked to approve a feasibility study and authorize preparation of plans and specifications for extending a pathway from Mississippi Shores to River Street, which was budgeted for 1997 and is part of the City's pathway plan. Public Works Director John Simola reported that John Bondhus was not interested in providing an easement across his property for future planned extensions of the pathway. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY ROGER CARLSON TO APPROVE THE FEASIBILITY STUDY AND AUTHORIZE PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE PATHWAY TO TERMINATE AT MISSISSIPPI SHORES. Motion carried unanimously. :..:: 1 t�T . .n • .w :: . Tt�7i1� It was reported by the Assistant Administrator that the annexation petitions reviewed by Council at the previous meeting would be provided to the Township for review at their meeting scheduled for August 18. No Council action was necessary. 12. Update an the Nati_onnl Quard Training rpnter. (verbal report) Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that the National Guard Task Force has narrowed the training and community center choices to three locations. Dan Wilson's development group is currently looking at coats and will present figures to the task force in the near future. O'Neill noted that the School District is open to examining the potential of ECFE programa at the site. Preliminary plans will include ECFE and the Alternative Learning Center; however, no commitments for locating these programs at the community center have been made by the School District at this time. Page 4 0 Council Minutes - 8/1 V97 The next task force meeting is scheduled for August 18, at which time the task force hopes to have an idea of the basic uses and costs for the facility and possible funding ideas. No Council action was necessary. 13. Co sideration of hills for thp first hnifofAik2mig . A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY BRUCE THIELEN TO APPROVE THE BILLS FOR THE FIRST HALF OF AUGUST AS PRESENTED. Motion carried unanimously. 14. OtheLmatte . 3A. Co aid ration of a variance r q ws . to va_rd setback req uirem n s. which wo Ad 11ow s simple subdivision Allyl4enntt Diane B. Ca ey g—ekkr. Assistant Administrator O Neill reported that Connie Decker requested a variance from the minimum 20 -ft side yard and 30 -ft rear yard setback requirements in the R-2 zone, which is being processed in conjunction with the replatting of two existing lots located south of bth Street and west of Minnesota Avenue. As a result of the subdivision, the proposed lots would be re -oriented from a north/south to an east/west configuration. O'Neill noted that approval of the simple subdivision would result in the creation of lots which comply with the minimum 80-11 lot width requirement rather than the current non- conforming lots with a width of 66 ft. The Public Works Director noted that utility easements may be required in the side yard. O'Neill noted that he would check on whether easements were needed. AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY CLINT HERBST TO APPROVE THE VARIANCE REQUEST TO THE YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS AND ALLOW A SIMPLE SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 6 AND 7, BLOCK 9, ORIGINAL PLAT, WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: IF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE IS REMOVED OR DAMAGED BEYOND 50% OF ITS VALUE AS DETERMINED BY THE COUNTY ASSESSOR, NEW CONSTRUCTION MUST BE SITED CONSISTENT WITH ALL APPLICABLE R-2 DISTRICT SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. IF NECESSARY, UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ARE VACATED TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION. Page 5 Council Minutes - 8/11/97 Motion is based on the finding that the existing non -conforming residence and its associated setbacks represent a unique circumstance, ample buildable land exists upon proposed Lots A and B to allow a newly constructed home to meet applicable R-2 district setback requirements, and approval of the variance will rectify/legalize an existing driveway encroachment. Motion carried unanimously. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY ROGER CARLSON TO ADJOURN. Motion carried unanimously. Karen Doty Office Manager IL Page 6 (D Council Agenda - 9IM7 5A. Consideration of n resolution approdng planig and snedfl atio a and authorizing advertisement for bids for the 199ed (riverawal& se entl. (J.O.) A tRIFERENCP AND RA .K .ROUND: City Council is asked to consider adopting a resolution ordering plans and specifications for the ` Uverrwalk" pathway project. As you recall, the feaibility study for this project was approved at the previous meeting of the City Council. This pathway connects Mississippi Shores to the developed portion of River Street. The bridge portion of this project, which crosses the Hart Boulevard storm sewer outlet, will be bid separately as a distinct project in order to improve bid responses. The plans will be available at the meeting for review if so desired. R. At TRRNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve a resolution approving plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for the 1997 Pathway Project (river -walk segment). 2. Motion to deny approval of a resolution approving plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for the 1997 Pathway Project (river -walk segment). C. STAFF R .O F.NDATION: The City Administrator recommends alternative 01. Approval of the plans and specifications is important to completing the project this year. M SUPPORTING DATA: Plans will be available at the meeting for review. Council Agenda - 8/25/97 BB. Con_a_ideration of a resolution aggro ng F ana and sFecLAcANona a++d anthoriz_in_g advertisement for bids for the foot bridge portion of the 1997 PathwayErWeet (river -walls segment). W.O.) A RFFIFRFNCR AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider adopting a resolution ordering plans and specifications for the foot bridge portion of the "Biver-walk" pathway project. As you recall, the feasibility study for the river -walk segment was approved at the previous meeting of the City Council. The bridge portion of this project, which crosses the Hart Boulevard storm sewer outlet, is proposed to be bid separately as a distinct project in order to improve bid responses. The plans will be available at the meeting for review if so desired. B_ ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve a resolution approving plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for the foot bridge portion of the 1997 Pathway Project (river -walk segment). 2. Motion to deny approval of a resolution approving plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for the foot bridge portion of the 1997 Pathway Project (river -walk segment). C. STAFF RFCOMMF.NDATION: The City Administrator recommends alternative 111. Approval of the plans and specifications is important to completing the project this year. Plans will be available for review at the meeting. AUG. -25' MON) 14:40 OLSON/USSET P. A. TEL:612 925 5879 P. 002 CITY oY K=ncnw X320 OTa A meeting of the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, was called to order by at p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, Monticello, Minnesota on , 1997. The following Council members were present: the following Council members were absent; A motion to adopt the following resolution was made by and seconded by 08o 97ZON • AmoR mm Commmumas or YRoipwr YU BSCRMT 25 .. WfaREAS, the City of Montieollo and the Minneaota Department of Transportation (KN -DOT) have entered into atn agreement for the improvement of Highway 251 and WHEREAS, the aforementioned agreement roquiree the City to acquire such right of way as may be necessary to improve Highway 25; and WHEREAS, it has come to the attention of the City Council of the City of Monticello that the property described on Exhibit A attached hereto is necessary for the upgrade and improvement of Highway 25: and WK9REAS, the City has determined that the improvement of Highway 25 is for a public pucposel NOW, THIMFORS, it is hereby resolvedi 1. The City staff, including the City Attorney and such other staff as may be necessary, are hereby directed to proceed with the acquisition of the property attached as Exhibit Al and 2. Acquisition of the property described in Exhibit A is for a public purpose and in furtherance of a public purpose, namely the upgrade and improvement of Highway 2S through the City of Monticello: and AUG. -25' 91(MON) 14:40 OLSON/USSET P. A. TEL:612 925 5819 P. 003 3. The City shall proceed by Quick take if, in the reasonable Judgment of the City Attorney and city Administrator such procedure is reasonably necessary for the timely completion of the Highway 1S improvement project. The following Council members voted in favor: the following Council members voted against or abstained: Whereupon the motion was declared duly passed and executed. -2- AUG. -15' 97 (MON) 14:41 OLSON/USSET P. A. TEL:612 925 5879 P. 004 DMIBiT A A AS r N A C T OF 7 Z T& 9 to the followlap deserlbod real property to WRZC6r wuxrr, nzfflMs TA That part of Lot A of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 121, Rance 25, lying west of the Monticello — Buffalo road (now !moan as Cedar:Street) and lying easterly of the easterly right of way line of Minnesota State Highway Number 25 as defined in Docuaent Number 244801, filed in Book 212 of Deeds, page 26 and 26. CERTIFICATE of SURVEY N rywn OOR•B@IYt3N•WaYtMNrAY900La7fi OV6 Kur. rsr,a..rw _.�u_aoarr.,au ras r. w r..r W;G" N W su..' FOtl40 I O: ULMO Ta> I't" IRON poo •a T Gway R•L.s ,Uo.ac+C ,�• O 1 aw uon> ika.o �ud :t r I / 19 P r � a / l 6 L.a- a... � r •-.,. � a.rylc7 I aI.` L• IOO.N I . — .. J. hblLru �srs,��u: G4.,� < �r t„ut 371Pr i r _�I_.YL•I Fa.�l TPI [.r✓or M,wrl.atto Po. tl.a 777 200 C46T Sgaa1.AV Mowntaato, Md, ssfct brought up to code prior to petition for annexation to the city. Voting in favor: Warren Smith, Brad Fyle. Opposed: Dan Blonigen, Clint Herbst. Absent: Shirley Anderson. Motion failed. Applicants Rick Murray and Joe Abbot requested that this item again be considered by Council at their next meeting when all Council members are present_ Consideration of puthorizine use of eminent domain oroceedin¢s to acquire Dundas Road rieht-of way. City Administrator Wolfsteller explained that for more than 10 years, the City has planned to extend Dundas Road in a westerly direction to connect to Highway 25. He noted that Dundas Road currently ends at Cedar Street, adjacent to Highway 25, and it has been the City's plan to extend the road to Highway 25 and eliminate the Cedar Street access to Highway 25. Wolfsteller went on to explain that in order to complete this extension, the City needs to acquire a small triangular piece of property lying between Cedar Street and Highway 25. Acquisition has bean difficult because it is not clear who owns the land. The property was originally owned by Olga Swanson, who sold approximately 20 acres lying west of Highway 25 to Mel ; Wolters. After review of the real estate documents by the City Attomey, there is still a question as to whether this strip of land is a remnant parcel still owned by the family members of the Swanson estate or whether it is Council Minutes • 11/14/94 owned by Mr. Wolters, who made the last purchase from the family. As a result. itis the recommendation of the City Attorney that the City pursue eminent domain proceedings to acquire this strip of land. This procedure would involve the City depositing with the Court system the market value amount of the property in order to obtain title. The Court system would then decide who is the owner of the property and disburse the money appropriately. After discussion, a motion was made by Clint Herbst and seconded by Dan Blonigen to authorize the City Attorney to begin eminent domain proceedings for the purpose of acquiring the narrow, triangular parcel adjacent to Cedar Street and Highway 26 for the purpose of future expansion of Dundas Road. Motion carried unanimously, with Shirley Anderson absent. 10. ConnidcratictnLof a re elution accenting feaaibitity study, ordering nublic hen 'ng, nn ordering arenarntion of clans and specifications fit xcwpr and gnter ufility extensions to the aeuthweat o n. Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported that o feasibility study was prepared by the City Engineer in 1992 at the request of Stuart Hoglund and John Michaelis for a project that proposes development of a lift station and other trunk'sanitary sewer improvements necessary to provide sanitary sower access to a large area referred to as the Southwest Area. The study pmposed two preliminary alternatives for providing sower and water service to thi a area. Subsequent to completion of the study, a third alt.ernativo was waterrddnn at sewer nnd to be run on Council Agenda - 8/25/97 nD (J.0.) The site plan requesting the conditional use permit included the concept of vacating a 30 -ft strip of the 80 -ft wide Hennepin Street right-of-way. Under the proposal, the City would retain easement rights. The proposal to vacate the right-of-way appears to make sense. Currently the right-of-way terminates at the railroad track. There is no possibility for connecting Hennepin Street through from 4th Street to 7th Street. Maintaining the 50 - ft right-of-way for public use allows the land owners on the west side of the Hennepin Street right-of-way to continue to use the right-of-way area for driveway purposes and, thus, does not result in a change in neighbor use of the 4th Street right-of-way. In discussing this matter with the neighbors, both support the concept of conveying the 30 -ft section to the Hospital District. Assuming that the City Council supports vacation of the right-of-way, the only issue that remains with regard to this topic is determination of the price of the vacated land. Rick has reviewed a number of comparable sales in the past. A few years ago, the City vacated a portion of Hart Boulevard and sold it to the Hospital District at a cost of $.67 per aq ft. This land was vacated without any easements retained by the City. The City also recently vacated and sold to Presbyterian Homes for $.67 per sq ft a portion of Hart Boulevard for the senior housing project. Whether the City retains easements or not, the past policy of the City has been to offer the vacated streets to abutting property owners, but charge fair market value for the land. For your information, the City vacated that portion of Hennepin Street lying south of the railroad tracks a few years ago and sold it for an apartment project. The City also sold a portion of Cedar Street for the Americlnn. R. ALTERNATIVE ACTION : Motion to approve vacation of a 30 -ft section of the Hennepin Street right-of-way as proposed at a cost of $.67 per aq ft. o trt Under this alternative, the City would vacate 9,900 sq ft at a cost of $.67 per sq ft, resulting in a total cost for the Hospital District to purchase the land from the City in the amount of $6,633. Council Agenda - 8/25/97 Motion to approve vacation of the Hennepin Street right-of-way as proposed at a negotiated price less than $.67 per sq ft. City Council may wish to reduce the "market price' of the property in an amount equal to the reduction in value resulting from the presence of the easements that the City would retain under that 30 -ft section. It should be noted that the 30 -ft section to be vacated is not 'buildable" due to setback requirements; however, the space does allow the Hospital District to make greater use of the land that they have under their possession by extending the perimeter of the developable area of the existing lot. Motion to deny vacation of a 30 -ft section of the Hennepin Street right - of way. Council should select this alternative if the Council believes it's in the best interest of the City to retain this right-of-way for future use. If City Council selects this alternative, then the site plan for the conditional use permit could not be implemented, which would result in the need to redraw the site plan and resubmit a new conditional use permit based on the area encompassed by the existing Hospital District property. L STAFF RRGOMMRNDATION: It is the recommendation of the City Administrator that the City vacate the portion of Hennepin Street as requested at a cost of $.67 per sq ft. It is the view of the Administrator that this is a fair value of the property and that no deduction is appropriate for the presence of the easements that remain due to the fact that purchase of the additional land provides the Hospital District with the opportunity to better utilize their existing site and thus gain greater value of the perimeter of the existing site. Map showing area to be vacated; Pleaso see the conditional use permit request map data. 01 e IQ 19i 0 34 m '- TRu , T! r•, Council Agenda - 8/25/97 ,1 , 1 A• It -0: '.I, A I 1 1\, 1 1 .1 �A1/ � r: A, 1 : Ar ^11: Ar M. e A RFFFRFNCF AND BACKGROUND: The Monticello -Big Lake Hospital District requests a zoning map amendment, a conditional use permit, and a simple subdivision that would enable construction of a garage and expansion of the parking lot at the Counseling Center. Currently, the use is a lawful, non -conforming (grandfathered) use in an R-3 district. The amendment to the zoning map would make the clinic a conforming use. In addition, the conditional use permit would bring the facility into compliance with site plan standards. The expansion proposal is modest and consists of development of needed parking space and construction of an accessory structure. The plan also includes the installation of a landscaped buffer yard between the new parking area and the residences to the west. See site plan for detail. The proposal also requires the vacation of a portion (30 ft) of the 80 -ft Hennepin Street right-of-way, which will be added to the Hospital District property. The proposal is consistent with the character of the area. The Counseling Center is located in a transition zone between commerciaUhigh density residential area and an R-2 zone. The PZM district is intended to provide land use regulations for this type of transition area. B. ALTFRNATNF ACTIONS: Motion to approve a zoning ordinance amendment changing the zoning district designation from R-3 to PZM, a conditional use permit allowing operation of a clinic facility, and a simple subdivision in a PZM District. (This is the alternative recommended by the Planning Commission.) The conditional use permit should be approved contingent on approval of the associated street vacation request and establishment of landscaping and treo planting as required by the ordinance. Additional plantings to be provided aro to buffer the parking lot from the adjoining residential area. The motion is based on the finding that the zoning map amendment and associated conditional use permit is consistent with tho character of the area and the comprehensive plan. Furthermore, a parking stall deficiency exists, which will be corrected by this action. Council Agenda - 8/26/97 Motion to deny a zoning ordinance amendment changing the zoning district designation from R-3 to PZM and conditional use permit allowing operation. The motion is based on the finding that the proposal is not consistent with the comprehensive plan. C. RF.COMMF.NDATION: The plan appears to be consistent with the comprehensive plan. The parking lot landscaping will be adequate to screen the lot from adjoining residences. Adjoining property owners have reviewed the plans for street vacation and are supportive. Copy of area map showing site; excerpts from zoning ordinance. SIG toy - 'WAY SCAOOL 2 -AA CHAPTER 8 'R-3" MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT SECTION: 8.1: Purpose 8-2: Permitted Uses 8-3: Permitted Accessory Uses 84: Conditional Uses 8-1: PURPOSE: The purpose of the "R-3" medium density residential district is to provide for medium density housing in multiple family structures ranging up to and including twelve (12) units and directly related, complementary uses. 8-2: PERMPITED USES: The following are permitted uses in an 'R-3" district: [A] Multiple family dwelling structures containing twelve (12) or less dwelling units. [B] Boarding houses as defined by Chapter 2, Section 2 [BF], and limited to not more than fifteen (16) persons. [C] Boarding (House) Home—Foster Children Restricted to children out of their own homes, ages sixteen (16) years or under, or in the case of mental retardation age twenty-one (21) or under, cared for twenty- four (24) hours a day for a period of thirty (30) days. The number to be cared for in one (1) foster child boarding (house) home shall not exceed five (5), including the foster family's own children, [D] Day Care Homes: Restricted to a family dwelling in which foster care, supervision, and training for children of school or preschool age out of their own home is provided during part of a day (less than twenty-four (24) hours) with no overnight accommodations or facilities and children are delivered and removed daily. The number to be cared for in one (1) day care home shall not exceed five (6), including the family's own children. The regulations and conditions of the Minnesota Department of Public Welfare, Public Welfare Manual 11.31.30 as adopted, amended, and/or changed shall be satisfactorily met and written indication of preliminary, pending, or final license approval firom the regulatory welfare agency shall be supplied to the City. [E] Public parks and playgrounds (F) Essential services MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE [G] Any use permitted in the "R-1" and "R-2" districts as regulated herein, 8-3: PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES: The following are permitted accessory uses in an "R-3" district: [A] All permitted accessory uses allowed in "R-1" and "R-2" districts. [B] Off-street loading. 84: CONDMONAL USES: The following are conditional uses in an "R-3" district: (Requires a conditional use permit based upon procedures set forth in and regulated by Chapter 22 of this ordinance.) [A] Ali conditional uses allowed in an "R-2" district. [B] Day carelgroup nursery provided that: 1. No overnight facilities are provided for the children served. Children are delivered and removed daily. 2. The front yard depth shall be a minimum of thirty-five (35) feet. 3. Adequate off-street parking and access is provided in D compliance with Chapter 3, Section 5, of this ordinance. 4. Adequate off-street loading and service entrances are provided in compliance with Chapter 3, Section 8, of this ordinance. 5. The site and related parking and service shall be served by an arterial or collector street of sufficient capacity to accommodate the traffic which will be generated. 8. All signing and informational or visual communication devices ahall be in compliance with Chapter 3, Section 9, of this ordinance. 7. The provisions of Chapter 22 of this ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met. 8. The regulations and conditions of the Minnesota Department of Public Welfare, Public Welfare Manual 11-31-30 as adopted, amended, and/or changed are satisfactorily met. 8. A written indication of preliminary, pending, or final license approval from the regulatory welfare agency is supplied to the City. MONTICELLO ZONIN13 ORDINANCE �C.10) W [C) MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING structures containing thirteen (13) or more dwelling units, provided that where the multiple family units are contiguous to single family residential zoned property, the front, side, and rear yard setbacks will be a minimum of forty (40) feet, and that the minimum setbacks for parking areas shall be forty (40) feet on the front yard, fifteen (lb) feet on the side and rear yards, with appropriate screening and landscaping with durable materials designed in harmony with the principal structures and an overall landscaping plan. MO"CELLOZONINOORDINANCE IrD 813 CHAPTER 10 "P7,13ESIDENTIAL & PZ -MD ED" ZONING DISTRICTS SECTION: 10.1: Purpose 10.2: General Description 10.3: PZR, Permitted Uses 10.4: PZR, Permitted Accessory Uses 10.5: PZR, Conditional Uses 10.6: PZM, Permitted Uses 10.7: PZM, Permitted Accessory Uses 10.8: PZM, Conditional Uses 10.9: Procedure 10.10: Compliance 10.1: PURPOSE: The purpose of the "PZ," Performance Zoning, districts is to allow for development flexibility and special design control within sensitive areas of the city due to environmental or physical limitations. The performance zoning districts also attempt to create a reasonable balance between the interest of the property owner in freely developing his property and at the same time protect the interest of surrounding properties in the following ways: [A] By encouraging a more creative approach in commercial and housing developments that will result in quality living environments through innovative design and aesthetic controls; (B) By permitting a combination of housing types and styles, including single family, two-family, and multiple family dwellings, with the exception of mobile homes; (C] By allowing flexibility in design by permitting cluster developments said a variety of architectural styles and treatments; [D] By allowing flexibility in setback and height restrictions. (E) By providing an efficient use of land resulting in more cost efficient installation of utilities, streets, and other facilities; [F] By encouraging the preservation of common open space, recreational facilities, natural features such as woodland, wetland, and flood plain; (G) By contributing to the tax base of the community without making undue demands on the community services; MONTICELLO ZOMINO ORDINANCE �G loll CHI By providing the means for greater flexibility in environmental design than is provided under the strict application of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance while at the same time preserving general welfare of the city of Monticello and its inhabitants. 10-2: GENERAL DESCRIPTION: It has been determined that within certain unique areas of the community, the precise designation of acceptable land use and the geographic definition of such activities cannot be accomplished without detailed analysis of land use, construction costs, and improvement feasibility and costs, market conditions, and financing. In such cases, in order to allow property owners the opportunity to pursue the highest and best use of their land within the constraints of environmental and physical limitations, the "PZ", performance zoning, districts have been created. To further define the intent of performance zoning, two separate districts have been created as follows: [A] "PZ-RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT": The purpose of the "PZ- Residential Zoning District" is to provide a harmonious mixture of different residential land uses in a manner which best utilizes the development potential of the land and natural environment, existing adjacent and future adjacent land uses. [B] "PZ-MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICT": The purpose of the "PZ- Mixed Use Zoning District" is to provide a land use transition between high density residential land uses and low intensity business land uses, as well as the intermixing of each such land use. 10-3: PERFORMANCE ZONE-RESIDENTIAL ("PZR") PERMITTED USES: Only the following uses are permitted uses within a PZR district: [A] Those uses listed as permitted uses within the R-1 zoning district. Standards shall be as contained therein. [B] Those uses that exist prior to the adoption of this chapter. (C] A permitted use shall be regulated by the terms and conditions of this ordinance as they pertain to an R-1 district. 10.4: PZR PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES: Only the following uses are permitted accessory uses within a PZR district: [A] Those uses listed as permitted accessory uses in the R-1 toning district. [B] A permitted accessory use shall be regulated by the terms and conditions of this ordinance as they pertain to an R-1 district. MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE SCS t m (b) The City Council may at its discretion place special requirements that will ensure the complete construction of all requirements. Such conditions may include performance bonds, time limitations for commencement of the work, and limitations on the hours of construction. (c) When areas are to be preserved by the developer, the City may require that such areas be fenced during construction to assure that equipment will not damage preservation areas. 10.6: PERFORMANCE ZONE -MIXED (PZM) PERMITTED USES: Only the following uses are permitted uses within a PZM district: "PZ -MIXED ZONING DISTRICT [A] Those uses listed as permitted uses within the R-3 zoning district subject to the standards contained therein. [B] Club or lodge without the serving of food or beverages. 0226, 6692) [C] A permitted use shall be regulated and controlled by the terms, conditions, and provisions of this ordinance as they pertain to an R-3 district. 10.7: PZM: PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES: Only the following uses are permitted accessory uses within a PZM district. [A] Those uses listed as permitted accessory uses in the R-3 zoning district. [B] A permitted accessory use shall be regulated and controlled by the terms, conditions, and provisions of this ordinance as they pertain to an R-3 district. 10-8: PZM: CONDITIONAL USES: Only the following uses are conditional uses in a PZM district. [A] Those uses listed as conditional uses in the R-3 zoning district and as regulated therein except as modified in this chapter. [Bl Hospitals, medical offices and clinics, dental offices and clinics, professional offices and commensal (leased) offices (limited to appraisers, architects, attorneys, certified public accountants, clergymen, dentists, engineers, manufacturers representatives, MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE I& r oO physicians, real estate agents, and other similar uses which have no storage of merchandise and are service oriented with no retail sale of goods on the premises), and funeral homes and mortuaries provided that: 1. When abutting R-1, R-2, R^3, or PZR district, a buffer area with screening and landscaping in compliance with Chapter 3, Section 2 [G], shall be erected. [C] Nursing homes and similar group housing, but not including hospitals, sanitariums, or similar institutions, provided that: 1. Side yards are double the minimum requirements established for this district and are screened in compliance with Chapter 3, Section 2 [G], of this ordinance. 2. One (1) off-street loading space in compliance with Chapter 3, Section 6, of this ordinance is installed. [D] Parking facilities for adjacent commercial or multiple dwelling establishments provided that: 1. Screening of abutting residential uses and landscaping is provided in compliance with Chapter 3, Section 2 [G1, of this ^ ordinance. (E] Retail commercial activities as listed in Chapter 12, Section 2, of this ordinance, provided that: 1. Merchandise is sold at retail only. 2. The procedures outlined hereinafter are complied with in full. [F] Buildings combining residential and non-residential uses allowed in this district provided that: 1. Residential and non-residential uses shall not be contained on the same floor. 2. The procedures outlined hereinafter are complied with in hill. [G] Senior citizen housing provided that: 1. Not more than ten (10) percent of the occupants may be persons sixty (60) years of age or under (spouse of a person over sixty (60) years of age or caretakers, etc.). 2. Except for caretaker units, occupancy shall be limited to man and wife, blood relatives, or a single man or single woman. MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE 1# 1&9 Council Agenda - 8/25/97 luaLp (R.W.) The Firefighter Relief Association membership is requesting that the City Council consider an increase in their retirement benefit from the present $1,375 per year of service to $1,576 or more after 20 years of service on the fire department. The following is a summary of the previous benefit increases that have been approved: 1987: $ 875 per year of service 1988: $ 976 1989: $1,075 1990: $1,175 1992: $1,225 1994: $1,300 1995: $1,325 1996: $1,375 By August 1 of each year, the Fire Relief Association must present to the City Council a schedule of the proposed benefits and total liabilities associated with the proposed benefit in comparison to the assets of the Association. Typically, it has been the past policy of the Council that they would only consider increases to occur in the yearly pension amounts if the Association had sufficiont income projected to cover the increase. In other words, the state aid and interest earnings on investments needed to be projected at a level sufficient to cover the normal annual cost of the pension calculations based on the requested $1,576 per year or higher amount. In the past, the City Council has not supported any benefit level that would require a contribution from the City as a tax levy. The pension schedule reports provided by the Relief Association treasurer indicate that tho Association should have sufficient funds to support an increase in the pension up to $1,860 per year of service. The treasurer has provided three examples of yearly pensions that range from $1,575, $1,625, and $1,650 as examples for the Council to roview. In all of the schedules, the assumption that there are sufficient assets in earnings from investments to support these pension amounts is based on an estimate that the interest earnings on their investments will continuo to cam at a rate of at least 7.97'x, which is their past 10 -year average according to their records. In addition, it assumes that the state aid funds received by the Association will continue to be equal to previous amounts and should increase as the City Council Agenda - 8/25/97 continues to grow. It should be noted that the reason the City Council must approve any increase in the Relief Association's pension is that ultimately, if projected revenue is not sufficient to cover the pension liability established, the City is responsible for covering the difference. In other words, if the City approves any pension amount before the Association has sufficient assets to cover the projected liabilities themselves, a reduction in interest income or a loss of some of their investments could obligate the City Council to use tax dollars to fund the balance. State aids are not always guaranteed, although it seems unlikely that a dramatic change in the state aid formula would occur. Based on the schedules provided by the Relief treasurer, which assumes at least a 7.97% interest earnings on their investments and state aid equal to the amount received last year, normal income should be enough to support even the $1,650 per year pension request. If the City Council chooses not to endorse a specific pension level, the Association cannot increase their benefits until they have at least 110'% of their liability covered by assets. Under the $1,575 per year schedule, the total projected assets of the Association would be $423,282, and their liability for this pension would be $488,288. This leaves them $65,000 short of being able to set their own pension amount. Based on the three examples provided, if the Council approved the $1,575 per year amount, this would give them a $200 per year increase over their current pension and would provide a little more cushion before any tax dollars would be needed if investment income was lower than projected. Grant an increase to $1,575 per year/$31,500. This increase, according to the Relief Association's schedule, would not require a City contribution and should be able to be funded through anticipated state aids and other interest earnings on investments, although there is not a guarantee. As I noted earlier, the interest earnings are based on an 8'% return, which has been the average over the last 10 years for the Association. Do not grant an increase in benefits at this time and only allow the increase to occur when the Association has more assets than liabilities. At this time, it would still take a few more years for the Association to have enough assets to increase the benefits on their own. Council Agenda - 8125/97 Grant an increase in benefits to an amount up to $1,650 per year/$33,000. The schedules provided by the Association indicate that even at this amount, there should be sufficient interest earnings and state aid to support the benefit without City tax levy. If for some reason the interest earnings do not meet expectations or the state aid is cut, the City could be required to use some tax dollars to support this pension in the future. Likewise, if an excessive number of individuals were to retire at one time, this could change the amount of assets that the Association would have and also change their future income stream. Should this happen, it is also possible that the City would be required to contribute funds to maintain the pension level. Based on the Relief Association financial computations, it appears that any of the proposed pension levels of $1,675 to $1,650 per year could be obtained without requiring any City contribution. Based on this information, I have no reason to object to an increase being granted as long as the City Council realizes that there are no guarantees that state aid or other investment earnings will continue at the present level or that some other catastrophic event wouldn't cause the need for a City contribution in the future. Computation of benefits for each member at the $1,576 per year level and financial schedules if the amount was $1,625 per year and $1,650 per year. Form SC -97 @ 1,575. SCHEDULE 1 -II FOR LUMP SUM PENSION PLANS REPORTING FORM YEAR 1997 STATE FIRE AID YEAR 1998 rrefighters Relief Association of County of Wright SCHEDULE 1 Computation of benefit of relief association special fund (u S per year of service) for W members based on their yeas of service as active fate department members. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1997 1998 F.D. To End of This Year To End of Next Year Name Age far J2= Years Active Accrued Years Active Accrued Month Yttar Service I Liability Service liability 11. T. Farnum 50 3 73 25 139.375 26 40,950 �1 12. J. Morrell 54 5 75 23 36,225 20 Ji,auu 13. S. Douglas 45 3 76 22 134,650 23 36.225 �4. W. LaBree 41 5 77 21193.07 as 5. M. Wallen 42 5 77 ?1 1J.&75 77 a 6 G. Dahlheimer 46 2 78 20 131.500 21 33.075 7. J. Wein 44 12 78 19.' 129.043 20 91,500 a. M. Johnson 40 3 81 17 24.570 18 ?6.744 9. M. Theisen 40 5 82 16 22.491 17 74.570 �I 10. T. Leifert 38 ll 83 l4 118.648 15 7n ova 1 B. Fyle 39 5 84 14 18,,648 1S 2n_aAa K. Stumpf 37 5 85 19 1fi—R 14 1a,6Aa 13. G. Host 35 to BS 12 15tiPt2 nes 16 acs 14. T. Bremer 34 12 85 II IS_152 1� 1t aaa 15. Total from Page 2 I •• DEFERRED total of Deferred Pensions. If Any. Total from page 2 Total Unpaid leas lm=. If Any, Tout from parte 2 Total of Early Vested Pensions If Any. Total ttom PW 2 A. Accrued Liability Through Next 534,594. Year 1998 (total. column 7) > B. Accrued liability Through This Year 1997 (ental, column S) 488.288. _> C. Subu= Use B 6om �.1ptt A (-TmsLc-1 46.306. Fmcdoml Years of service must be calculated to oanst till yar. Do not enter liability in Columns S or 7 for any person who will teaive em)m pension durin4 this yesr. Enter this pension amount on Schedule H. Section 1. Linn b. For iastalbaem Uability. tmar amount wh)cb will be payable after end of dtis year in both column S surd column 7. rest If inteis m be on unpaid pensions. add interest for I year in column 1. A copy of these schedules mum be ptesemN w the City Council before August 1 each year. Page I 124. 123. 59UrLs,ramet,dRmtecr�r>a�a��crloamnsl � I Nam An Emm Dq Date Aeenred I I Dehried Pmtloas 1. x. I3. 14. L sahenealacnrre�eaeen�baa I 1 I2. Unsold Imimb eats I Ij FArh Vested Pmslsas 1. I2 7. �,Ca1MnM1 pCWd�YMeQ-Btednas SCHEDULE 1 - ADDITIONAL MEMBERS �qq 1997 1993 al P.D. To End of Thin Ya{ T. FV pt Nem fl Name Age ppZ-JDM Yuan ACEM Accrued Yean Active Accrued Moab Yen Service l Lubd n Service Lnbitin �}- ReRWu Pemmn ! pI. H. Simpson 41 1 87 11 13.514 12 15-152 �I. 2. L. Larsen 36 I 87 11 13,514 12 15.152 I �3. N. Kranz 30 5 87 11 13.514 12 15.152 a. S. Samuelson 1.1 t r 97 10 11 07t)1 11 r� cr lI d 5. B. Stumpf 34 7 88 9 10.490 10 11.970 I IGp'6. B. Cyr 33 l 90 8 9.072 9 10.490 7. J. Michaelis 33 1 90 8 9.072 9 110.490 I a. C. Sangteby 32 5 93 5 I 5,261 6 6.458 I 9. R. Lymer 33 5 93 5 5,261 I 6 6,458 1 ( to. J. Kranz 33 5 93 5 5,261 6 6,458 l It. T. Johnson 31 5 93 5 5.261 6 6.458 1, 112. S. Joerg 33 10 94 3 2,993 4 4,095 1� 113. P. Drev 32 10 94 3 ' 2.993 4 4.095 Iota. R. Volbrect 41 l 90 7 I 7.749 I 8 9.072 IS. L. Dahlheimer 30 _j_ 96 2 I 1.953 I 3 7-0. t6. S. Hanson 25 S 96 2 1.953 3 2.993 IIII 117. 113. 19. � 20. 1. I 124. 123. 59UrLs,ramet,dRmtecr�r>a�a��crloamnsl � I Nam An Emm Dq Date Aeenred I I Dehried Pmtloas 1. x. I3. 14. L sahenealacnrre�eaeen�baa I 1 I2. Unsold Imimb eats I Ij FArh Vested Pmslsas 1. I2 7. �,Ca1MnM1 pCWd�YMeQ-Btednas Schedule II 0 $1,575 Section 1 Determination of Projected Net Assets for the year coding December 31. 1997 'xcial Fund Assets at December 31. 1996 1 S 381,602 y (Sec Ending Assess in Reporting Form - 1996) Projected Income to December 31. 1997 a. Mimxsoa State Aid $ 43,249 (Use 1996 amount, exclude mppl-1) b. Municipal (independem fire) Camibutiom $ c. Dotes (List ) S d. Investment Income 10 Yr Avg 7.91 $ 30.147 e. Realized Gait (losses) $ f. Umealized Gait (losses) S S. Other income (Includes Supplemental) S (list - 1 Total 21 71.-m Projected Assets plus home December 31. 1997 (line 1 + line 2) 3$454.998 Projected Disbursements through end of year It. Pemdom lfarvin Flicker S 30.216 i. Other berefin S 200 j. Administrative S 1,300 Toal 4$ -11,716 Projected Assets at end of year (line 3 mimm tine 4) 5$423,282 . ct10n 2 Datrodwdon qf Projected Surpka (DoUit) as a December 31. 1997 Projected As" (line 5) 65423,282 Accred liability (Ilse B. Schedule 1) 7S488,288 Surplus (deficit) (Subtract line 7 from 8ne 6) 8$ 65,006 • Go to Seaton 3 (f Surplus • Go to Seedea I If Ddlek Section 3 D-"nD acne ef Mwddpol Cau ibudon ff Surplus) Normal Cost (UM C. Schedule 1) 911 Calculated Adminisaadve Fiapeasse (1996 Reporting Fort Adm. Exp. S a 1.033) 10 S Lets: It. Mi—, State Aid S 1. 5 % of lite 5 S m. 10% of lieu 8 S Taal Subtr cti m 11 S Municipal Contriln don (line 9, phta 10 mitran 11) 1211 If 51.00 or greater, certify to municipality before August 1. 1997. oegadve number. no contribution is dorm. GO TO SECTION 5 Pada 3 co C Section 4 Drum mcae of Humapat C -rift— (If DeAcv) AnrardiarEOe of Def)acs. Year Incurred Column I Cotmo 2 Cotama 3 Amis Rema in Prim Amount Left to Onnnal Amount Yem Retire 1934 25.803 13.439 12.364 19 95 2,386 476 1.910 19 o. 65,006 (Lesion 2. tine 8 19 _ Sub[oul » rasr e . P.M. r®em o. 14, 274 (Column 3 Subtotal) �v.,m.tDdkh(19n 50,732 50,732 p. 50, 732 (o mimrs0.) Tomb 78,921 13,915 65.006 Scop IF I If Line p is positive, enter One p in colurnm land 3 of New additioml &fIcit (97) line. (ibis is your New addidooal Deficit for 1997.) Step a 2 If tins pis negative, reduce -1— 2 sad 3 according to Deficit Reduction in the iwwztiom. page 6. aTortir.n o of Deficit (Total from Cob— 1 78,921 ,.to) 13S 7.892 Total from line C, Scbe uta 1, Normal Cog 14 S �— CalcutuedAdmidstrgtiveP.speme(1996Reporting Form Adm.Eap. 3,437 a 1.033) IS$ 3.557 Subtotal Lines 13+14+15 163 57,755 Less: q. M' ,,,,= Stare Aid S 43,249 5% or line 5 S 21,164 Total Sduucd m (subtotal of Lines q and 0 17%64,413 Municipal Con"&Ai0a (Ilm 16 mime Line 17) 16S 6,658 (d O or ,segadve, teen 4 w murt( d ects Oodm) Yoq men eertlh ro mneklnaBh beftrn Anraq 1, 3997, meg V as cooaSAatlat N doe. Section 5 Ca)culanoa of Average rptdal )lord irwow per newber A+R+C e Received c- Recely" D A B C D 6 Sore Mtmktpal toof Active AW Support Smvlus Members Average Ian Year 19% 2 ye3n ago 1995 3 years apo 1994 Total column E divWW by 3 Maltimum pqrmiq Bemrt -note 0. totuta S f Loot up W msui of P oa the tsbb (page 7 W the twromlans) to obtain 0. f Ttb b yaw mall--- betcft tbb ynr. Ya canna Idueass bmfha beyond Lib :recons. Pap 4 9k] 1 Schedule II 0 $1,625 Section 1 Detesminadw of Projected Na Asses for the year coding December 31. 1997 xial Fund Assets at December 31, 1996 1 S 381,602 (Set Ending Assets in Repotting Form - 1996) Projected Income to December 31. 1997 it. Minmson State Aid $ 43,249 (Use 1996 amount, exclude supplemennl) b. Municipal (independent fire) Comibadons S c. Donations (List ) $ d. lovestmem Income 10 yr Avg. 7.9% S 30.147 e. Realized Gains 0ossa) $ f. Unrealized Gains (losses) S g. Other income (Includes Supplemental) S (List - 1 Total 2$ 73.396 Projected Asses plus Income December 31. 1997 (line I + line 2) 3$ 454.998 Projected Disbursements through end of year b. Pensions S 30,216 i. Other benefits $ 200 j. Administrative S —T, JU5-- Tewl 4$ 31.716 Projected Assets st cod of year (tine 3 mime line 4) 5$ 47'1,7A? ctlon 2 Daezndtmdon qJ Projead Surphtr (Ddidt) to if December 31. 1997 Projected Asaw (tine 5) 6$ 423,282 Accrued Liability Dim 8, Schedule 1) 7S 503,789 Surplus (deficit) (Subtract line 7 firm Um 6) SS 80,507 • Go to Sea(on 3 If Surpltu • Go to Seetlna 4 If 1101a Section 3 Davwdtaadan cV MwtdAW Cottn(Enrriom (U&rplur) Normal Cost (Line C. Schedule 1) 9S Calculated Administrative Expense (1996 Reprndog Form Adm. Exp. S : 1.035) 10 S Las: It. Minnesota State Aid S 1. 5% of Una 5 S M. 10% of tine 8 i TOW Subawdons 115 Mttdeipal Contribution (1ae % ptm 10 mime I I) 12$ If $1.00 or greater. certify to w-ldpality bdM August 1. 1999, oegative member. no coovlbutiaa is due. GO TO SECTION 1 Pap 3 G� Section 4 Detea kulows of Msmtdpal CaaniDutiar (d DeJtal) Amortization of Dsffcin. Year Incurred Cohmn I Column 2 Cos®n 3 nan,et a,m.a i. eats Amount left to Cbidml Amaro ye- Roue 1924 25,803 13.439 12.364 Total from line C. Schedule I. Normal Cort 1995 2,386 476 1,910 t 5 s 3,557 119 16S 60.775 a 80,507 owsion,.line S 19 _ _ q. Min=caa State Aid s 43,249 ear s . pal,..wmw1 I Sulxotal — n• 14.274 (Cob— 3 Subtaaq IN_wnn.katt9M 66,233 66,233 p. 66, 233 (a.minwo.) `Tants 77,422 13,915 80,507 1C O or negative. there it no wtaldpal conttiDatlan) Step O I sf line p is positive. enter line p in cohmm 1 and 3 of New uditioml Deficit (97) line. Section 5 (rats is you Nm additional WIM for 1997.) CWadaUM of AveMle Wdol JLad income Per member Step O 2 Lf line p is negative, reduce columns 2 am 3 aaordiy to Deficit Redwetion In @e instructions. page 6. Amor7uian of Deficit (Taw from Column 1 94,422 a.to) 13s 9.442 Total from line C. Schedule I. Normal Cort 14s 47.776 CalettWed Administrative Expense (1996 Reporting Form Adm. Pap. 3,457 a 1.035) t 5 s 3,557 Subtoml Lind 13+14+13 16S 60.775 Leas: q. Min=caa State Aid s 43,249 ss of Lim s s 21,164 Taw Subttaalom (subtotal of Lines q and r) 17S 64,413 Municipal ComibtNon (8m 16 mlmu Line 17) IIs 1C O or negative. there it no wtaldpal conttiDatlan) You must teftlh fn maaklrpoft before Aurmt 1. 1997. fete If no ecaMboft h Asa, Section 5 CWadaUM of AveMle Wdol JLad income Per member A+H+C • Received or Recdvabb D A B C D E Stam Mudclyal los of Actin Aid- support Surplus Members Avesala Fut year 1996 2 year aRo 1995 3 yon ap 19M Total column a divided by 3 P. sl I Maslmurn Pension under 0. �Beneft statute s I I e Loot up 0e sank of P on the table OW 7 In Wa Instructions) to drain 0. f Tfils is your maahnum benesh this year. You cum iaaeam bendU beyond rob amount pip I Schedule II 0 $1,650 Section 1 Determination of Projected Net Aeras for the year coding December 31. 1997 ecial Fund Assets at December 31, 1996 1$ 38t,602 (See Ending Assasin Reporting Farm -1996) Projected lnm= to December 31, 1997 a. Minnesota State Aid f 43,249 (Use 1996 amount, mdudc supplemental) b. Municipal (independent fire) Contributions f c. Donations (Lin$ ) d. ��m Inge LU Yr. Avg 7.9/ f T4i e. Realized Gains (losses) S f. Unrealized Gains (losses) S S. Other income (Includes Supplemental) f put - Total 2f 73,396 Projected Assets plus Income December 31. 1997 (line I + line 2) 3$ 454,998 Projected Disburses through etrd of year h. Pensions Morn 7 f 30,216 i. Other benefits f 200 j. Adminismdve f 1,300 Total •S 31,716 Projected Assets at end of year (line 3 minus line 4) SS 423.282 C _ cdon 2 num,dnadon of Projected Suphu a)edt) as 0 Deeenma 31. 1997 Projected Assets pine 5) 6S 423.282 Acr ued ILbiliry (tine B. Sdmxb, a 1) 7$ 51t.533 Surplus (deficit) (Subtract line 7 hum line 6) 8S 88.251 • Go to Secdonr 3 V Smpina • Go to Sttrfat 4 If Ddw Section 3 Da-daddon of M -k pal C -t ib don (USuMbarl Normal Cost (line C. Schedule 1) 93 Calculated Administrative Expense (1996 Reporting Farm Adm. Exp. f a 1.035) 10S Lem: k. Mimtesota Sun Aid f 1. 5% of line 3 S M. 1091 of tine 8 f Total Subtractions lis Muddpal Contribution (Hoe 9, phis 10 rrA— 11) 12S �r SI.00 of grata. ardfy m muWdpdhy betbrn August 1. 1997, y negative member, no contribution Is due. t:o TO serrtfN) s Pap 3 9G Section 4 Determtriamm of Mwucoal Cownburion (J &ffcu) Amom;auon of DeJlau. Year Incuned Cohn I Cohmmn 2 Column 3 imam P d d I. PS., Amoant Left to Onlpml Amami vee. Retire 19994 25,803 13,439 12,364 19 95 2.386 476 1.910 19 a 88,251 (aeaion2,u.It 19 max a . pond ®acre Subtotal o, 14,274 (Column 3 Subm!) r4" WWI 0cf"(19 n 73,977 73,977 p. 73,977 (a.mintato.) �Tough 102.166 13.911 88.251 Step I I If be p is positive. enter tine p in columna I and 3 of Nein aAaioml Deficit (97) l'me. (This is your New additional Defidt for 1997.) Step 12 If line p is negative, reduce cohtmm 2 and 3 aecotdiq to Deficit Reduction in the instntctim, pole 6. Amortization of Deficit (rota from Cotu= l 102.166 x.10) 13S in -2t7 Ton] from line C. Schedule I. No mal Can U S 48,510 Calculated AdmLn vxwve P_cpeme (1996 Reporting Form Adm. Emp. 3,437 It 1.035) ISS 3.557 Subtoul Linea 13+14+15 165 62,284 Less: q. MW=m Stam Aid S 43,249 5% of Um 5 S 21.164 Taal Subtnuiom (tubtonl of linea q ad r) 17 S 64,413 MurJcipd Contribmlen (Line 16 mlmn line 17) ISS 2. 129 Id 0 or nesaaye, Wre is to ntwidpat contrlirdotr) You mini ceedh to morMna0h before A,,—sl 1, 1997, nen U m eonMMrtbn h due. Section 5 Calcafacan of Average 4KcW fled fwcom per awrwber A+R+C • Received or Receivable D A B C D 8 Son Mut>icipal 10% of Act]ve Aad* Supmn Stwhn Memben Avenge lou year 1996 2 years ago 1995 3 years ago 1994 Total corn 8 divided by 3 P. I I Matimum Pension fiend& under 0. mono S I 1 Loot upthe tta b of P oo 0s table(pegs 7 m gm Wsruaim) m ohmin O. f This is your m,,H— beaelY ILh year. You aural iocm baodits beyond this smaam. Pap 4 r= Council Agenda - 8/25/97 10. Consideration of proceeding with constrnction of new nnim�l abetter. O.S.) With the design of the structure being completed by Bloomenthal's Architecture, Inc., the public works department completed the specifications for the electrical requirements of the building, the site plan, and over the past several weeks have been soliciting proposals from area contractors and vendors for the materials and labor neoucsary to build the Caulity. The building inspection department has been working on the plumbing and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning system requirements and is soliciting proposals for that work. At the present time, we have less than 50% of the building construction priced out. We hope to be much further along to provide additional information at Monday evenings meeting. We will present that information and recommendations at the meeting. Enclosed you will find a copy of the site plan for your review showing the building location, grading, and parking expansion. x958.43 CX � C o � 0 v, i:— C U (L of N al o e C.i 0 95y.62 X I I C, �1352.76 TNH 957.17. � > o > Break into MH Within V of Invert 8 Run 4" PVC To Prop. Line 6y Means Of Directional Boring, Pneumatic Gopher, etc. Scale I"= 201 Existing Grades 958.51 w :MP bprons by City) Proposed Grades —958 Shape & Compact Fill Under Bit. Area 'Installed in2lifts) ,s5 I isting Imp House 'E. 958.0 ?In , L t ne15cu rrouu Edps of Esistino Bit. Property Line 0 Council Agenda - 8/25/97 41 1 •, , r 1Mi City staff is continuing to work with architect Al Korud in analyzing our space needs and preparing some schematic designs on how city hall could be configured in the Marquette Bank building. Marquette Bank officials have not yet agreed upon an exact amount of space they would like to lease back in this building, which relates to how the balance of the main floor could be remodeled. In the meantime, Marquette Bank is reviewing a purchase agreement format that the City has prepared outlining various details of a possible purchase, although an exact dollar amount has not been finalized. Assuming an agreement is reached and the purchase takes place, the Council would then have to review its options for use or sale of the existing city hall property. In anticipation that city hall may be moving to another location, an appraisal was obtained on the city hall property from R.A. Fields & Associates, certified appraisers. R.A. Fields was selected to do our appraisal since this was also the firm that was used by Marquette Bank for appraising the bank property. This firm has been utilized by the City in the past and is also the main appraiser used by Marquette Bank for their commercial lending purposes. As you may recall, the appraisal estimated the value of the city hall property at $595,000. For comparison purposes, R.A. Fields had also appraised the Marquette Bank facility at $750,000. The following summary shows the relationship between the market value as shown in the tax books versus the appraised value. Market Value Per Counth Appraiser's Value CITY BALL $585,000 $595,000 MARQUE M BANK $703,000 $750,000 The above summary seems to support that normally the appraised or actual market value of a property is usually slightly more than the market value used by the County Assessor for tax purposes. If city hall is relocated, the question becomes what should we do with the existing city hall property. A number of options certainly exist for the City, including an outright sale of the property, leasing the building for Council Agenda - 8/25/97 commercial purposes, or finding some other public use of the property. If it is determined by the Council that there does not appear to be any other public use for this property at this time or in the near future, the sale of the property might be in the best interest of the City. If it is the consensus that the property should be sold, the Council should establish procedures and a process to use in marketing the property. There are certainly a number of options available such as utilizing the services of a commercial real estate agent, advertising the building for sale in local newspapers and real estate journals, or simply advertising the property for sale by bids, etc. At this point in time, other than the fact that the public may be aware of our interest in relocating to the Marquette Bank facility, we have not actually made this building available or advertised that it would be available for sale. Although a process has not yet been established, the City has received a letter of interest from a local business interested in purchasing the city hall property for $400,000. This proposed purchase price is approximately one- third less than the estimated appraised value noted in our recent appraisal. A copy of the proposal is enclosed for your review. If the Council feels that the eventual sale of the city hall property is the route to go, it may be better to advertise that the property is available and set an asking price. While I realize that the individuals offering to purchase the city hall property may have an urgent timetable to meet for relocation, the Council will have to decide whether the proposed offer is actually a good business deal for the City in light of our appraisal and considering the property has not officially been offered for sale. As in all real estate transactions, the offering price and the sale price may not be the same; but at this time, I do not have sufficient information to support that the City should consider lowering its expectations of the value of this property by one-third. As additional background information, the initial investment in city hall was approximately $460,000 in 1978. Since that time, the City has acquired additional land for future expansion purposes and enlarged the parking lot at a cost of over $130,000. As a comparison, the total square footage of the city hall parcel is over 87,000 aq ft versus approximately 49,000 aq ft at Marquette Bank. To summarize, the Council will need to decide whether we should try to find some other public use for the property or whether it should be marketed. If a sale seems the most logical, procedures should be established that make it available to all parties. B_ ALTF.RNATIVF. ACTIONS: If it's the consensus to sell the property, Council could accept the purchase proposal of $400,000. Council Agenda - 8/26/97 Council could reject the purchase proposal and make a counteroffer to the interested party. Council could market the property by making it available to all interested parties through either a real estate agent or by simply setting a timeline for accepting bids/proposals. Council could retain the property for future public use or attempt to lease the property to other public agencies or as general office space in the meantime. Assuming relocation of city hall does occur, I'm not aware of any other immediate city use for this structure. If we had our own police department, this could be a good place for that function; but this could be years away. As far as other public agencies or general office space leasing, I'm not aware of any efforts being done by City staff to investigate that alternative. It's the recommendation of the City Administrator that marketing procedures be established as noted in alternative N3. I do have concerns on accepting an offer that is substantially below our own appraisal without first offering or attempting to market the property to the general public. It could very well be that the proposal presented is reasonable, but it would be hard to determine that at this point without having had an attempt to market the property in other ways. If the Council suspects that our own appraisal is inaccurate, you may want to consider requiring any interested party who submits an offer substantially below our own appraised value to supply their own appraisal that supports their proposal. At this time, the City's appraisal appears to be reasonable when viewed with other comparable sales and in relation to the market values previously established by the County Assessor's office for similar type properties. Any sale of the city hall parcel should be contingent upon successful negotiations by the City in acquiring another site for city hall. Copy of purchaso proposal; Copy of city hall appraisal. noway Peterson-CjrimsmoChapel 539P.O. Box815 ,815 Mmtfee90 MN 55382 A TRADITION OF TRUST ..... SINCE 1933 (812) 2852918 August 15, 1997 Rick Wolfsteller, City Administrator Bill Fair, Mayor Bruce Thielen, Councilmember Clint Herbst, Councilmember Brian Stumpf, Councilmember Dear Rick, This letter is to advise you of our intentions and possible purchase of the current Monticello City Hall located at 250 East Broadway. If we receive a positive response to this proposal, we will follow it with a Purchase Agreement In the very near future. We at Peterson-Grimsmo Funeral Chapel (partners of Arve A. Grimsmo and Roger A. Carlson) are offering to purchase the current Monticello City Hall located at 250 East Broadway (including building, parking lot, and adjoining properties owned by the City) for the sum of $400,000.00. (Four Hundred Thousand Dollars) We are aware that the City has had the site appraised and the appraised value Is higher than the amount we have proposed to pay. However, we do feel that our offer is fair and can be justified. and Is also in the City's best Interests on several concerns. We will briefly outline some our reasoning In making this offer. Comparisons In looking at recent sales and pending sales of commercial office space in the City, our offer is actually quite generous. The two most recent comparable sales Involve the sale of the former Lindquist Funeral Chapel to Steve Conroy. and the current pending sale of the Marquette Bank building to the City of Monticello. In looking at the sale of the funeral home to Steve Conroy, the building sold for $160.000.00 and Is approximately 6.000 square feet on the main floor. This amounts to a per square foot charge of $25.67. The building Is approximately 30 years old and has limited off street parking. Applying these values to the City Hell senarlo, we arrive at the following values: City Hall main floor of 6244 square feet and 1144 square feet at the lower level and using the Undqulst sale value of $25.67, we arrive at the value of $189,649.96 for the current City Hall location. ARVE A. GRIMSMO — ROGER A. CARLSON. FUNERAL DIRECTORS 116 - HAROLD T. PETERSON. FOUNDER 530 W. Brow" Peterson -Grimsmo Chapel P. Box 915 Montic l NN 55362 A TRAORION OF TRUST ..... SINCE 1933 (812) 285-2919 The pending sale of the Marquette Bank to the City is proposed for $750,000.00 for 19, 028 square feet. After consulting local realtors, it can be appropriate to look at square foot figures in the following senarlo. Second floor square footage can be valued at 75% of main floor square footage, and lower level (basement) square footage can be valued at 500% of main floor values. Thus working backwards from a sale price of $750,000.00, we can arrive at the following per square footage values. 7712 square feet on the main floor reflect a value of $52.54 per square foot. Second floor area of 3604 square feet reflect a value of $39.40 per square foot. Finally, lower level square footage of 7712 square feet reflect a value of $26.27 per square foot. Using the Marquette Bank values, we arrive at 7712 square feet on the main floor at $52.54 ($405.188.48), 7712 square feet on the lower level at $26.27 ($202,594.24), and 3604 square feet on the second floor at $39.40 ($141,997.76), and extending these values to the current City Hall location we arrive at main floor values of $328.059.76 (6244 square feet at $52.54), and lower levels values of $30.052.88 (1144 square feet at $26.27), for a total value of $358,112.64. Our offer of $400,000.00 is 10.4746 above this calculation. Advantages to City We also believe there are several positive reasons for the City to consider our offer, which include: >>>No other offer exists at this time. >>>The City could save potential listing commissions If the property were listed for sale. These charges could be In excess of $30,000.00. >>>A sale to Peterson-0rimsmo Chapel relieves the City from the liability o1 Insuring and securing a vacant building, and any associated maintenance. >>>The City would be putting the property at 250 East Broadway back on the tax rolls at the same time they remove one by occupying the Marquette building. >>>The City would be generating cash that could be used to accomplish some remodeling and/or reduce debt on the new City Hell. >>>The City would be assured that the current location at 250 East Broadway would remain a prominent and attractive entrance to the 'downtown' area. Land at Sixth and Walnut As you are probably aware. we also own five lots at the corner of Sixth and Walnut Streets which was originally intended for our use to construct a new funeral chapel. Obviously. it we can purchase the current City Hall, our need for the land at Sixth and Walnut disappears. Therefore, we are willing to offer this land to the City for an amount equal to what we have Invested to date In the propurty. Pah of the delay we incurred In trying to construct our building at this site was the fact AWE A. GAIMSMO — AMR A. CARLSON, FUNERAL DIRECTORS /' B NAAOLD T. PETERSON. FOUNDER L/ 530 . Smadway Peterson-CjrimsmoChapel P. O.. Boa815 . P. 818 Mordke bo, MN 56382 A TRADITION OF TRUST ..... SINCE 1833 (612) 286.2818 that we were made aware of the potential of groundwater and/or soil contamination of the property due to contamination of surrounding properties. We were required to have a Phase II environmental study of the property completed. The results of that study have been recently been made available to us, and show no contamination that would restrict development on the property. Including our purchase price, the cost of the environmental study, and recovering a portion of the interest we have been paying since acquiring the parcel in February 1997, we are willing to otter the parcel to the City for the price of $160,000.00. (One Hundred Eighty Thousand Dollars) The parcel consists of five lots covering an area of 1.25 acres or 165 feet by 330 feet. Conclusions We are ready to proceed with a possible agreement In the near future. Our architects and contractors have looked at the City Hall building and property and feel it has a good potential for our use. As expected however, it is not perfect and some remodeling and an addition would be necessary to accomodate our facility. As we have learned in the past few months, time passes very quickly when building projects are involved and thus we would like to have our otters considered In the most timely manner possible. Thank you for your consideration of our proposals and we will await your response. Sincerely, Arve A. Grlmsmo Roger A. Carlson ARVE A. GRbMSMO — ROGER A. CARLSON. FUNERAL DIRECTORS HAROLD T. PETERSON. FOUNDER //Coo R. A. Field A Associates Federally Certified Appraisers 520 Northeast 218th Avenue Cedar, Minnesota 55011 LEMTER OF TRABBMITTAL July 11, 1997 Mr. Fredrick H. Patch, Chief Building official/Zoning Administrator City of Monticello 250 Zest Broadway P.O. Box 1167 Monticello, Minnesota 55362-9215 RE s Monticello City Ball Building 250 Zest Broadway P.O. Box 1147 Monticello, Minnesota 55362-9245 Deer Mr. Patchi Pursuant to your request, we have made a careful inspection of the captioned property, which is more particularly described elsewhere in this report, and have made a study of the conditions affecting its value. The estimato of value as stated in this report is predicated upon the definition of market value contained herein. Implicit in the definition of market value in that payment is made in cash or its equivalency. The equivalency of cash is conventional financing at bank/institutional rates. The subject property is appraised based upon cash or equivalent financing. The property rights appraised consist of title in fee simple. By virtue of our investigation we have formed the opinion that the value of the subject property, as of June 16, 1997, is as follows, $ 595,000 This appraisal is made subject to certain limiting conditions and assumptions as hereinafter expressed. Such facts and information contained herein warn obtained from sources that we considered reliable and are true to the best of our knowledge. The following report describes our method of approach, contains data gathered in our investigation, and dsasonstrates our analysis in arriving at the estimation of market value for the subject property. Respectfully submitted, R. A. F d As ociat Certified General Real Property Appraiser License Number 20005641 iiD 1 SECTION 3 APPRAISAL SM"Y PORK THIS IS A SUIOIARY REPORT OF A COMPLETE APPRAISAL THE PROPERTY OWNER OR REPRESENTATIVE DID HOT ACCOMPANY U8 ON OUR PROPERTY INSPECTION APPRAISERBt OWNER(S)t Mark R. Schwab City of Monticello R. A. Field i Associates 250 East Broadway 520 Northeast 218th Avenue P.O. Box 1147 Cedar, Minnesota 55011 Monticello, Minnesota 55362-9245 (612) 434-3316 (612) 295-2711 COUNTY PID NUMBERS 155-010-069020 155-010-069040 155-010-069060 155-010-069000 ZONINGS B-4; Business Camous SCHOOL DISTRICTS Monticello 1997 REAL ESTATE TAiEHS Tax ex SPECIAL ASSESSMEHTSS None Noted VALUE OF LAID INDICATED BY THE MARKET APPROACH 8 214,000 VALUE OF SUBJECT INDICATED Of THE COST APPROACH 8 628,000 VALUE Or SUBJECT INDICATED BT THE INCOME APPROACH $ 849,000 VALUE 0/ SUBJECT INDICATED Of THE DIRECT SALES COMPARISON APPROACH $ 614,000 3 //r FO E1RC FINANCIAL SYSIEM CITY OF MONTICELLO f 1/22/97 14:03:32 Schedule of bi Its OL0505-VO4.30 CUVbRPAGE v GL540R Report Selection: RUN GROUP... 00815 COMMENT... 0158 8/1S DATA -JE -IO DAIA COMMENT L3 -081B1997-133 GEN 8/1 5 Run Instructions: Jobq den n©r Copies Form Printor Hold Space LPI Linea CPI J O1 Y 5 6 066 10 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONIICELLO '22/97 16:03:38 Schedule of Bills 13,0/OR-1101.30 PAGE I VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND 6 ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POS F/P ID LINE A.E. MICHAELS STORM -DED REG 101.25 1997 STORM DAMAGE EXPENS 101.42501.1101 133 00001 DED REG - OP SUPPLIES 46.34 RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.45201.2199 133 00002 147.59 -VENDOR TOTAL AMERICAN PAGING OF MINNt JOHN M, RICH C 28.38 TELEPHONE 601.49410.3210 133 00004 PATI 32.24 TELEPHONE 602.49490.3210 133 00005 PATIY 11b.76 TELEPHONE 101.4 2701.3210 133 00006 JOHN 5 14.19 TELEPHONE 101,/3110.3210 133 00007 GARY A 14.19 TELEPHONE 101.4 2401.3210 133 00006 JOHN L 14.19 TELEPHONE 101.45201.3210 133 00009 TON B 14.19 TELEPHONE 101.43115.3210 133 00010 TOM B 14.19 TELEPHONE 101.43120.3210 133 00011 211.33 -VENDOR TOTAL ANOERSON/RICK STORM - RICK ANDE60N 1,101.00 1997 STORM OAMAGE ENPENS 101.42501.IID1 7/21 TO 8/01 133 00012 ARCA 6MNESTY DAY -RECYCLING 2,016.00 PROF SRV - RECYCLING CON 101.43230.3101 11003 133 000il AUTOMATION SUPPLY DATA PROC-PRINTED FORMS 252.56 PRINTED FORKS 6 PAPER 101.41920.2030 101055 133 00014 8 6 D PLUMBING 6 HEATING LIOUUR-REPAIR A/C MOTOR 211.22 REPAIR 6 RIC - MACH 6 EO 609.19751.1011 19549 133 OOOTS BAROO PRODUCTS. INC. DARKS-IRIIMLR LINE 33.36 RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.15201.2199 %963 133 00016 BATTERY WHOLESALE. INC. NAIER-RECHARGE BATTERIES 59.00 UTILITY SYSTEM NICE SUPP 601.49/10.2270 11598 133 00019 NAIER-IRUCK BATTERY 16.56 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 601.49110.2211 11127 133 00018 135.56 -VENDOR TOTAL BELLBOY CORPORATION 849 L IDOOR-I AX MI SC 21.61 RISC TAMABLE 609.49150.2510 26019000 133 00020 BERNICK'S PEPSI COLA Cpl IIUUOR-POP PURCHASE 132.75 RISC TAXABLE 609.49150.2510 133 00021 BRAUN ENGINEERING NNIP-PRUf SERVICES $.116.61 RISC PRUIESSIUNAL SERVIC 136.119201.3199 93285 133 00022 BRC - ASSISI CENTER •INAPQE PRINTED TOM 221.92 PRINTED TOM 6 PAPER 101.41520.2030 4119411 133 00017 CAREFREE LANK SERVICE FIRIHALL-LAWN MAINZ 95.05 MISL PNOFESSIDN4 SERVIC 101.42101.J1V9 1/15.1/23.1/29 133 00023 LIBRARY-LA44 IWMI WITS RISC PROFLSSIONAL SERYIC 211,45501.3199 1/15,1/23,1/79 111 00024 ,BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONIICELLU '22/97 1/:03:38 Schmie et Bills GL510R-V01.30 PAGE 2 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OMNI ACCOUNI NAME FUND i ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POI F/P ID LINE CAREFREE LAWN SERVICE LIOUOR-LATIN RAINI 95.85 RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 609.19751.3199 7/ 15.7/23,1/29 133 00025 287.55 -VENDOR TOTAL CENTRAL MINN INT TIAIIVE CRIF GRANI REIMS 1,100.21 WMT REIMBURSEMENT 223.45501. 6601 STANDARD IRON 133 00026 CLARK FOOD SERVICE, INC. CITY NALL-SUPPLIES 235.60 RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.11910.2199 133 00028 FIRE - SUPPLIES 102.02 RIS: OPERATING SUPPLIES 10 1.42201.2199 23 7107, 241441 133 00027 331.62 -VENDOR TOTAL CONDON-SKEIN AN TIOUE CA ANTIQUE TRUCK INSURANCE 61.75 VEHICLE INSURANCE 101.12201.3530 133 00029 CONSTRUCTION MARKET DATA STORM SEVER-BULLEIIN 201.10 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 153.19201.3510 133 00030 CULLIGAN , 1/1 TO 0/31 RENTAL 23.86 RENTAL HOUSE EXPENSES 24 0.49201.4381 ID 00031 LHEIMtR OISTRIOVING BEER 11,019.51 BEER 509.19150.2520 131 00032 MON ALCHONOLIC BEER 21.50 RISC IAJLABLE 609.19150.2510 111 00033 11.011.07 -VENDOR TOTAL DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER 195.10 BEER 609.49750. 2570 133 00031 MISC NONIAAABLE 38.10 RISC NON TAXABLE 609.191SO.MIT 133 00035 233.10 -VENDOR IOTAL DICK WHOLESALE CO., INC. BEER 395.05 BEER 609.19150.2520 133 00036 LIOUOR-SUPPLIES 30.19 LIQUOR STORE SUPPLIES 609.19151.2110 133 00037 125.91 VtNOOR TOTAL OYNA SYSTEMS SHOP -OP SUPPLI ES 319.15 RISC RETIRING SUPPLIES 101.13127,2199 113 00030 EARL F ANDERSON 6 ASSOCI 61R1,EI5-51GB5 88.10 RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 10143120.2199 2822 I3) 00039 EHLERS 6 AM, INC PUBLI TIF 1.17 105.00 RISC PROFESSIONAL SIRVIC 213.16517.3199 ID 00000 IIF 1.22 105.00 RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 217AW?.J119 113 00061 210.00 -VENDOR TOTAL ,ALROGIRK CORPORAIION FIRE - REPAIR 59.30 REPAIR 6 MIC - MACE 6 EO 101.12201.1011 1962 113 00042 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MOIL IICtLLO 22/97 14:03:38 Schedule of B1114 GLWR404.30 PAGE 3 Ilk VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND 6 ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE Pot F/P 10 LINE FEEORIIE CONTROLS, INC. NATER - CHEMICALS 35.00 CHEMICAL PRODDCTS 601.49110.2160 DA7070 133 00046 NATER -I -POTABLE 12.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 601.49110.3199 25031 133 00045 MATER-I-POIABLE 12.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 601.49110.3199 25072 133 00011 WATER -1 -POTABLE 12.00 RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 601.49110.3199 25853 133 00043 NAIER-EQUIP REPAIR 108.33 EOUIPMLMI REPAIR PARIS 501.49110.2210 26772 133 00048 MATER - CHEMICALS 2.271.43 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 601.49110.2160 26895 133 00047 2.150.75 -VENDOR TOTAL GARTNER'S OFFICE PRODUCT CITY HALL -01' SUPPLIES 396.04 RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.41940.2199 32035 133 00052 CITY HALL -OP SUPPLIES 585.14 RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.41940.2199 32058 133 00051 SIOR71-IAPE 6.34 1997 STORM DAMAGE EXPENS 101.42501.1101 32100 133 00019 CITY HALL -OP SUPPLIES 74.34 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.41940.2199 32121 133 00050 1,061.86 -VENDOR TOTAL GLUNL/RAT KRAUIBAUER 325.00 PROF SRV - EXCAVATION 651.49010.3115 LOT 653.GR 7 133 00053 HERMES/JERRY 'IBRARY-CLEANING 227.50 PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL 211. 45501.3110 1J3 00054 HOGLUND BUS COMPANY FIRE -12 FORD FOOD 400.41 REPAIR 6 MIC - VEHICLES 101.42201.40SO REPAIR 133 00056 HOGLUND COACH LINES LID JULY CONTRACT 5,951.26 PROF SVR - HEARTLAND BUS 610.19801.3060 133 00055 KRAMBER 6 ASSOCIAIES, IN ASSESSING SERVICES 1,130.39 PROF SRV - ASSESSING 101.11550.3125 AUGUST 133 00051 MINNEGASCO UIILIIV-CIIY NAIL 16.18 GAS 101.41940.3830 133 00051 UIILIIY-AN SHELTER 9.88 GAS 101.42101.3830 133 00059 UIILIIY-PARKS 9.81 GAS 101.45201.3830 133 00060 UIILIIY-NATLR 10.10 GAS 601.19110.3830 133 00061 UIILIIY-FIRE NAIL 41.62 GAS 101.42201.3830 133 00062 UIILIIY-SHOP/GARAGE 135.04 GAS 101.43121.3130 I)3 ODC63 UIILIIY-LIBRARY 20.32 GAS 211.15501.3130 131 G0061 UIILIIY-LIQUOR STORE 20.32 GAS 609.49161.3830 1)) 00065 UTILITY-DEP REG 9.81 GAS 101.41190.3830 13) 00066 211.22 -VENDOR [DIAL MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONIRD ANIMAL CONTROL CONTRACT 2,259.10 PROF 5RV - ANIMAL CIRL 0 101.42701.3120 AUGU51 133 CG667 IIICELLO COMUNIIY SCH COIN FD-SUMMLR PROGRAM 17,b00.00 RISC PROILSSIONAL SLRVIC 101.15176.3199 133 000611 l8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONIICLU U '22/97 11:03:38 Scneoule of Bills 61.51011-V01.30 PAGE 1 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION ANOUNI ACCOUNT NAME FUND i ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POI F/P 10 LINE NON110ELLO PRINTING TOOTH ANNIV POSTERS 981.09 RISC OTHER EXPENSE 10 1.12201.1399 133 00069 MONTICELLO SENIOR CITILE CONTRACT 2,833.33 SENIOR CENTER CONTRIBUTI 10 1.15175.3135 AUGUST 133 00070 P"ECOCIOUS PYROTECHNICS, LIOUOR-RIVERFESI FIREWRII 10,000.00 OTHER EQUIPMENT 50 9.19751.5801 133 00071 PREUSSE'S CLEANING SERVI CLEANING - CITY HALL 160.00 PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL 10 1.11910.3110 AUGUST 133 00012 CLEANING - DEP REG 120.00 PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL 10 1.11990.3110 AUGUST 133 00073 CLEANING - PUBLIS WORKS 150.00 PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL 10 1.13110.3110 AUGUST 133 00011 730.00 -VENDOR TOTAL U.S. POSTIIASIER PUBLIC WORAS - STAMPS 61.00 POSTAGE 10 1.13110.3220 2 ROLLS 133 00075 USA WASTE SERVICES, INC JULY BILL196 5,482.I0 PROF SRV - REFUSE COLLLC 10 1.13230.3100 133 00077 510R14 - CLEANUP 208.15 1997 STORM GARAGE EXPEMS 10 1.42501.44 01 133 00079 5.690.65 -VENDOR TOTAL WRIGHT COUNTY AUDIIOR-IR SCLRG GRANT REIM 2,760.51 GRAN] REIPSURSEAE111 222.116$01.6501 133 00079 SHERIFF PATROL 26,956.00 PROF SRV - LAN EXFORCEAE 10 1.12101.3050 AUGUST 133 00080 29,716.51 -VENDOR TOTAL Y.M.C.A. OF AINMEAPOLIS CONTRACT 625.00 RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 10 1.15111.3199 AUGUST 133 00075 QVC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 22/97 11:03:38 Schedule 04 Bills VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOIINI ACCOUNI MME FUND i ACCOUMI REPORT TOTALS: 108.570.70 RECORDS PRINTED - 000079 CITY OF MON TICELLO 8L510R-V01.30 DARE 5 CLAIM INVOICE P03 F/P 10 LINE .-RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 122/91 14:04:10 Schedule of bills FUND RECAP: 815,3115J) FUND DESCRIPTION ---- ---------------------------- DISBURSEMENTS 101 GENERAL FUND 57,051.02 211 LIBRARY FLUID 343.61 213 MRA FUND 210.00 222 SCERG (ECON RECOVERY GRANT ) 2 ,160.51 223 CMIF (CENT AN INII FUNDI 1 .100.21 240 CAPITAL PROJECT REVOLVING FO 23.86 435 93-I4C MM1P EXPANSION PRJ 5 ,116.64 453 91-07C NIGH SCHOOL IR 51 SEM 204.40 601 NATER FUND 2.525.50 602 SLMER FUND 32.24 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 22.115.59 610 TRANSPORTATION FUND 5,961.26 651 RIVERSIDE CEMETERY 325.00 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 100,510.10 BANK RECAP: BANK NAME ---- ----------------•--------- -. DISBURSEMENTS 6ENL GENERAL CHECKING 815,3115J) LION LIQUOR CHECKING 2 2,115.59 TOTAL ALL BANKS IGD,510.10 INF PRLCE01NG LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS RLVIENED AND APPROVED FOR PAYAEMI. DATE ............ APPROVED BY ................................. I CIIY OF MONTICELLO GL0505-Y04.30 RECAPPAGE GL540R FV BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONIICELLO ""'/22/97 14:04:58 Schedule of Bills GL050S-VO4.30 COVERPAGE GL540R Report Selection: RUN GROUP... 00822 COMMENT... 8/22 CKS DATA -JE -10 UATA COMMENT ----------- -- ------------------------ 0-08221997-134 8/22 CKS Run Instructions: JobO Banner Cooies Fon Printer Mold Space LPI Linef CPI J 01 Y S 6 065 10 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTE1 CITY OF MONTICELLO 08/22/97 14:05:03 Sc Male of Bills GL540R-VO4.30 PAGE VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION ATIORMI ACCDUNI NAME FUND 6 ACCOUNI CLAIM INVOICE POI F/P 10 LINE AFFORDABLE SANITATION REFUSE - AUGUST 127.80 RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43230.2199 134 00001 FIRE - 100 ANNIVERSARY 255.60 RISC OTHER EXPFASE 101.42201.4311 134 00002 383.40 'YEIIDDR TOTAL ALBERG MATER SERVICE LLC SIORA-WELL 11 EMERGENCY 711.50 1997 SIOR11 DAR46E EXPENS 101.42501.1101 10585 134 00003 ALSINSON, INC. PWAON - COPY SUPPLIES 82.90 DUPLICATING 6 COPY SUPPL 101.13110.2020 532221 131 00004 PN-INSP - OP SUPPLIES 221.83 RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.4 3115.2119 632221 134 00005 304.73 -VENDOR TOTAL AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR CO SIORM-VEM BLDG DOORS 3,218.0D 1997 STORM OAM6E EXPENS 101.42501.4401 71053 134 00006 IERNICK'S PEPSI COLA COR LIQUOR STORE -POP 17.95 RISC TAXABLE 609.4 9750.2540 12199 131 00007 BUSINESS RECORDS CORPORA CITY MAIL -PRINTED FORMS 633.30 PRINTED FORTIS E PAPER 101.41301.2030 4149553 134 00008 C R MFG. CO REFUSE -BINS 3.245.16 RISC OPERAT ING SUPPLIES 101.43230.2199 96537 134 00009 CAREFREE LAWN SERVICE RIVERSIOE-LABM4 MAINTE $59.13 PROF SRV - LAW SERVICE 551.49010.3105 JULY 134 00010 COUNTRY GRILL, INC STORM -MEALS 61.77 1991 SIORM DAMAGE EXPENS 101.42501.1101 134 00011 OANLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING BEER 4.311.10 BEER 609.49150.2520 134 00012 LIQUOR - BROOM 31.23 CLEANING SUPPLIES 609.4 2154.2110 134 00013 1,419.33 -VENDOR TOTAL DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY LIQUOR-8EER 614.45 BEER 609.49150.2520 134 00014 LIOUOR-MISC IAIUBLE 38.40 RISC TAXABLE 609.491so. 2540 134 00015 652.15 -VENDOR TOTAL DICK WHOLESALE CO., INC. LIOUOR-BEER 1,010.70 BEER 609.49150.2520 134 O316 LIQUOR -RISC TAXABLE 25.31 RISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 134 00017 LIQUOR SUPPLIES 11.75 I.1000I STORE SUPPLIES 609.4 9754.2140 134 00018 1,122.76 -VENDOR TOTAL FEDERAL EXPRESS REFUSE-FREIGNT 16.25 RISC REPAIR 411C SUPPLI 101.43210.2211 134 00019 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY GF NONIICELLO ^"122/97 14:05:03 Schedule of Bills GL510R-VO4.30 PAGE 22 v VENDOR NAME OESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND 6 ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE P09 F/P 10 LINE FIRSTAR BANK GD TAX BDND 193.00 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 380.47001.5201 134 00020 GO IRPR BOND 199.00 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 377.11001.5201 134 00021 60 TAX INCREMENT 195.50 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 323.47001.6201 134 00022 GO IMPRO BOND 195.50 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 325.41001.6201 134 00023 GO TAXABLE INCRE 195.50 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 382.47001.6201 134 00024 GO IMPRO BONO 118.00 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 325.47001.5201 134 00025 60 IMPR BOND 118.00 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 327.47001.6201 134 00026 60 MATER SYSTEM 210.00 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 354.41001.6201 134 00021 1,424.50 -VENDOR TOTAL G 6 K SERVICES SHOP RAGS 22.30 RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43127.2199 134 00034 ENV CHARGE, SALES TAX 65.39 RISC DINER EXPENSE 101.43120.4399 134 00037 OEP REG 28.95 REPAIR 1 MIC - BUILDINGS 101.41990.4010 RUGS 134 00036 LIOUOR STORE 58.07 REPAIR L MIC - BUILDINGS 609.49154.4010 RUGS 134 00036 SEWER 45.27 UMIFORR RENTAL 602.49490.4170 UNIFORMS 134 00028 MATER 43.77 UNIFORM RENTAL 501.49440.4170 UNIFORMS 134 00029 PW AOM 19.80 UNIFORM RENTAL 101.43110.4170 UNIFORMS 134 00030 PM-INSP 66.51 UNIFORM RENTAL 101.43115.4110 UNIFORMS 134 00031 STREETS 173.10 UNIFORM RENTAL 101.13120.4170 UNIFORMS 134 00032 6 R 30.18 UNIFORM RENTAL 101.45201.4170 UNIFORMS 134 00033 ` 553.55 'VENDOR TOTAL GENERAL RENTAL CENTER STORM - GENERATOR 274.27 1997 STORM OAIIAGE EXPENS 101.42501.4401 134 00038 GLASS NUT/TME BRIDGE PARK -GLASS DOOR 101.00 REPAIR 6 MIC - BUILDINGS 101.45201.4010 97-951 134 00039 GRIGGS, COOPER 6 COMPANY FREIGHT 190.00 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 LIGUORI STORE 134 00040 LIQUOR 14,979.93 LIOUOR 609.19150.2510 LIOUDR STORE 134 00041 RISC TAXABLE 398.55 RISC IAKABLE 609.19150.2510 LIQUOR STORE 134 00042 15.528.51 •VLNDOR IOTAL GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE INC. BEER 16,161.70 BEER 609.11750.2520 LIQUOR STORE 131 00043 RISC TAXABLE 79.50 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 LIOUOR STORE 114 00041 16,111.20 -VENDOR TOTAL JIM MATCH SALES CO STREETS -OP SUPPLIES 1,255.08 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2119 7651, 1911 134 00045 JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE L FREIGHT $0.59 FREIGHT 509.49750.3710 LIQUOR STORE 134 00041 'IOUOR 4,011,19 LIOUOR 509.49750.2510 LIQUOR STORE 134 00048 .NE 1,302.06 WINE 509.41750.2530 Ll MR SIORE 171 00049 5,166.94 -VENDOR TOTAL BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 08/22/97 14 :05:03 Schedule of Bills VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNI ACCOUNT NAME FUNDI ACCOUNT KEN ANOERSON (RUCKING (32) ANIMALS 170.40 RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.42701.3199 KEN'S 66 SERVICE INSP-VEH REPAIR 122.39 REPAIR 6 RTC - VEHICLES 10 1.12401.4050 KNUDSON TREE SERVICE STORM -BRUSH HAULING 2.510.00 1997 STORM DARAGE EXPENS 10 1,12501.4401 KTA-TAIOR, I NC. WWIP-MOISTURE MEIER 390.05 RISC OTHER EXPENSE 136.49201.4399 LAKE SI REALTY SERVICE CITY HALL—MKI VLU APPRSL 2,850.00 RISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 150.49201.3199 LARSON'S ACE HARDWARE SHOP -OP SUPPLIES 19.14 RISC OPERAI U4 SUPPLIES 10 1.13127.2199 PARKS -OP SUPPLIES 222.26 RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 1014201.2199 MATER - OP SUPPLIES 3.49 RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 501.49110.2199 PARKS-SAALL IDOLS 10.25 SRALL IDOLS 6 EOUIPMENT 10 1.45201.24 10 PARKS-EOU1P REPAIR 2.12 EOUIPREMI REPAIR PARIS 10 1.4201.2210 STORM 696.26 1997 SIORR GARAGE EXPENS 10 1.42501.44 01 SHOP-SAALL TOOLS 12.99 SMALL IDOLS 6 EQUIPRENT 101.43127.2410 STREETS-CLOIKING SUPPL 1.11 CLOTHING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2111 FIRE -WEN REP 4 NAINIE 2.53 REPAIR 4 MIC - VEHICLES 10 1.12201.4 050 NAIER-OIIL SYS SUPP 21.73 UT ILI IY SYSTEM NICE SUPP 501.494A0. 2270 WATER -0P SUPP 22.21 RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 501.49110.2199 1,107.43 'VENDOR TOTAL LUKACH/JOHN CITY HALL 10.67 IRAVEL EXPtNSE 101.41940.3310 PARKS 49.08 TRAVEL EXPENSE 101.15201.3310 LIBRARY 30.67 IRAVtL EXPENSE 2 11.15501.3310 FIRE DEPT 12.27 TRAVEL EXPLNSE 10 1.42201.3310 122.69 'VENDOR TOTAL MRIU'S FARM SERVICE PARKS - OP SUPPLIES 138.29 RISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 10 IJS2DI . 2 199 MCOONALL COMPANY LIQUOR -COOLER 6 WALK IN 111. b5 REPAIR 4 MIC • RICH 4 EO 609.49754.4011 CITY MALL -A/C REPAIR 133.66 REPAIR 4 MTC MACH 1 EO 101.41910.4041 1,491.31 'VENDOR TOTAL MICHELE HER TWIG SIDRN-TEMP HELP $9.50 1997 SIORM OANAU EXPLNS 1 01.12501.4401 MICHELS IRUL•IIIRG, INC LIQUOR - FRUGHI 16.00 FRtlwl 609.19750.3330 CLAIM INVOICE 2890 1464 28161 70099 CITY OF NONIICELLO (10102404.30 PAGE 3 POI F/P 10 LINE 134 00050 134 00051 134 00052 134 00053 BRI<IIw 134 00055 134 00056 134 00051 134 00058 134 00059 134 0 134 Deb 1 134 00062 134 00063 134 OOOb4 134 00065 MILEAGE 134 00066 MILEAGE 134 00067 MILEAGE 131 00068 MILEAGE 134 00069 �IIPIiI' 134 00070 134 0097' 0/11 -and 131 0004b 171 ODD 11 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO '12/97 14:05:03 ScHwlaule of BMs GL540R-VO4.30 PAGE A v VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION IMOUNI ACCOUNT NAME FUND 6 ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POB F/P ID LINE MILLER ARCHITECTS 6 BLOS ESCROW 3,250.00 ESCROWS - COND OCCUPANCY 101.22013 136 00094 MJORUO ARCHITECTURE CITY HALL-COMP SITE STOY 3,590.00 BUILDINGS 260.49201.5201 136 00073 MN DEPT OF TRADE 6 ECON SCERG GRANT REIMS 2,493.45 GRANT REIMS - AROPLAX 222.46501.6602 136 00074 WONIICELLO BLOCK STORM - OEP REG 19.17 1997 STORM OAKAGE EKPENS 101.42501.1101 4222 134 00075 MONTICELLO PRINTING INSP-PRINTED FORMS 316.71 PRINTED FORMS 6 PAPER 101.12401.2030 134 00017 MONTICELLO TIMES LEGAL 1,062.20 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 101.41601.3510 134 00078 PUBLIC HEARINGS 291.01 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 101.41910.3510 134 00019 INTERNET 247.50 GENERAL PUBLIC INFORMAII 101.41910.3520 134 00080 SIORM 890.40 1997 STORM DAMAGE EKPENS 101.42501.1101 136 00091 2,471.11 -VENDOR TOTAL NATIONAL BUSHING PARTS 16 STREETS - OP SUPPLIES 5.59 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2199 134 00092 STREETS - VEH REPAIR PIS 1.11 VEHICLE REPAIR PARIS 101.43120.2211 134 00083 SIORM-GENERATOR 25.42 1997 STORM ODUGE EKPENS 101.62501.1101 134 00014 WATER-VEH REPAIR PRIS 239.63 VEHICLE REPAIR PARIS 601.49110.2211 134 00095 218./2 'VENDOR TOTAL NORTHERN STATES POWER CO WATER 1.582.64 ELECTRIC 601.49460.3110 134 00085 SEWER 193.33 ELECTRIC 602.49490.3110 134 00011 STREET LIGHTS 5,620.12 ELECTRIC 101.63160.3010 134 00018 PARKS 1,253.99 ELECTRIC 101.15201.3110 134 00089 CIVIL DEFENSE 3.14 ELECTRIC 101.42501.3110 131 00090 9,053.12 -VENDOR t01AL ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC. LOCATES 708.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 501,49440.3119 JULY 134 00091 PAICH/FRED INSP-TELEPHONE $1.32 TELEPHONE 101,12101.3210 134 00092 PRESBYTERIAN HOMES HOUSI SEMI ANNUAL PAYMENT 2.494.43 TIF PAYBACK IYSIALLMLNIB 213.16519.6511 136 00093 'SESSIONAL SERVICES GR GIP CONTRACT 34,259.00 PROF SRV - PSG, INC 602.19100.3000 SEPIERUR 174 00095 ARC FINANCIAL SYSTEA CITY OF MONIICELLO 08/22/97 14:05:03 Schedule of Bills GL54OR-VO4.30 PAGE 5 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCWNI NAME FUND 6 ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POB F/P 10 LINE SCHLUENOER CONSTRUCTION STORM-S1UMP REM 6 LOADER 25.812.75 1997 STORM OAMAGE EXPENS 101./2501.1101 2288, 2279 134 00096 SIMPSON/CYNTHIA FIRE HALL CLEANING 50.00 PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL 101.42201.3110 131 00097 STEPHENS-PECK. INC DEP REG - IITLE BOOK 67.50 BOOKS 6 PA14PHLEIS 101.11990.1350 134 00096 105 TELECOM PARKS 150.13 TELEPHONE 101.45201.3210 134 00099 CITY HALL 1,505.60 TELEPHONE 101.4 1301.32 10 134 00100 FIRE DEPT 76.55 TELEPHONE 101.4 2201.3210 131 00101 ANIMAL SHELTER 71.19 TELEPHONE 101.42701.1210 134 OOle2 MATER 124.43 TELEPHONE 601.494/0.3210 134 00103 PUBLIC WORKS 110.19 TELEPHONE 101 .4 3 110.3210 134 00104 CEP REG 175.97 1ELEPHDRE 101.4 1990.3210 134 00105 LIQUOR 234.12 1ELEPHONE 609.49754.3210 134 00106 2,781.13 -VENDOR TOTAL TOTAL DISPOSAL SYSIEN STORM-DEMO 6 GARBAGE 479.25 1997 STORM OAMAGE EXPENS 101.4 2501.4401 134 I7 U.S. POSTRASIER DEP REG - POSTAGE 350.00 POSIAU 101.41990.3220 131 00101 WOLFS) ELLER/R I CHARD IRAVEL 30.00 1RAVEL EXPENSE 101.41301.3310 131 DOM PW INSP - OP SUPPLIES 18.90 N ISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43ITS. 2199 131 00110 48.90 -VLNInR TOTAL I BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM '22/91 11:05:03 Schedule of Bills VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMWNI ACCOUNT NAME FUND 6 ACCOUNT REPORT FOIALS: 153,301.18 RECORDS PRINTED - 000110 CITY OF MONIICELLO GL54OR-VOA.3D PAGE 6 CLAIM INVOICE POI F/P ID LINE 8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MOITICELLO 08/22/91 14:05:45 Scwul4 of Bills GL050S-VO4.30 RECI 'c GLSAOR FUND RECAP: FUND DESCRIPTION DISBURSEAENIS 101 GENERAL FUND 57, 291.90 211 LIBRARY FUND 30.67 213 HRA FUND 2,491_13 222 SCERG (ECON RECOVERY GRANT) 2, 183.45 240 CAPITAL PROJECT REVOLVING FD 3. 680.00 323 1989-1,-2. -3 G.O. BOMO FUND 195.50 325 1990C G.O. BOND FO (E.SANOB) 195.50 326 1991A- 1,-2,•3 G.O. BOND FO 119.00 327 1992A C HILLS/SCHDOI BLV BD 111.00 354 1908 MATER SYSTEM BOND FUND 210.00 377 TIF 1915 (VEII) BOND FUND 199.00 380 TIF 1911 ( ELDERLY) BOND FUND 193.00 382 TIF 19900 (REM/TAP) BONO FO 195.50 435 93-14C MIIP EXPANSION PRJ 390.05 450 96-04C HMY25/MNODI IMPR 2, 850.00 601 NATER FUND 2,832.90 602 SEMER FUND 34,491.60 509 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 41,153.15 651 RIVERSIDE CEMETERY 559.13 f01A1 ALL FUNDS 153,304.19 BANK RECAP: BANK NAME DI SBU RSEMEN IS GENL GENERAL CHECKING 100,541.63 LIOR LIQUOR CHECKING 46,163.15 TOTAL ALL BANKS 153.304.78 THE PRLCEOING LIST OF BILLS PAYACLE WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYNLNI. DATE ............ APPPOVED BY ................................. COUNCIL UPDATE August 22, 1897 (R.W.) As I mentioned a few weeks ago, the Land of Lakes Choir Boys gambling organization has contacted me with an interest in seeing what they could do to help the City and its residents recover from the July 1 storm damage. The Choir Boys Organization operates their gambling out of J.P.'s Annex. Initially, Gambling Manager Ann Vogt questioned whether the City would be willing to administer a grant program for needy citizens to help with various repairs if funded by the Choir Boys. I indicated that I did not believe the City would have the time or personnel available to get too involved in establishing a grant program for needy citizens and recommended another type of contribution be considered. With tree damage as the most obvious residt of the storm, the Choir Boys Organization was willing to contribute funds that could be used by the City for any type of reforestation project, whether on the boulevards, city parks, or private property. The Choir Boys would like to be involved in some way helping with the tree planting program, and they recently gave the City a check for $6,000 for this purpose. At this time, the funds will not he used for any specific expenditure and will be earmarked for use as part of our reforestation program either this fall or next spring. I wanted the Council to be aware of this contribution. COUNCIL UPDATE August 88, 1897 Council worksh=& (R.W.) As you are aware, the City Council will need to adopt a preliminary budget for 1998 by September lb and certify this amount to the Wright County Auditor's office. Unfortunately, City staff is behind schedule on completing a preliminary draft of the proposed budget, but we hope to have a preliminary budget completed by the end of August. This will leave approximately two weeks for the Council to review the preliminary budget. While I realize there may not be more than one or two workshops that can be squeezed into this two-week time period, the Council will have more opportunities prior to our final adoption in December to review and adopt a budget plan. If we are not able to have sufficient workshops prior to September lb, I would suggest that we simply indicate a proposed tax levy that is at the maximum allowable, as we will always have the ability to cut back from that point later on. The Council should consider establishing one or two workshop dates ager Labor Day but before the 16th that may work in your schedules. Possibly these workshop dates can be act at Monday night's meeting.