Planning Commission Agenda Packet 12-03-1985AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
December 3, 1985 - 7:30 p.m.
Members: Jim Ridgeway, Joyce Dowling, Richard Carlson, Richard
Martie, Ed Schaffer.
7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order.
7:32 P.M. 2. Approval of Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held
November 12 , 1985.
7:34 P.M. 3. Public Hearing - A Conditional Use Request to Allow
an Office Business in a Proposed New Zone, PZM
(Performance Zone Mixed). Applicant, Seestrom Company.
7:54 P.M. 4. Public Hearing - A Replatting Request to Allow
Construction of a Zero Lot Line Duplex on Existing
Lots. Applicant, Vic Hellman.
6:09 P.M. 5. Public Hearing - A Replatting Request to Allow
Construction of a Zero Lot Lino Duplex on Existing
Lots. Applicant, Jerry Barthel.
8:24 P.M. 6. Public Hoaring - A Replatting Request to Roplat
an Existing Lot into Eight Townhouce Lots and Ono
Common Area Lot. Applicant, Jay Miller.
8:39 P.M. 7. Public Hearing - A Variance Roquoet to Allow Additional
Pylon Sign Square Footage than the Maximum Allowed
and a Request to Allow a Non -conforming Sign to
be Erected. Applicant, Burger King.
8:54 P.M. 6. Public Hoaring - A Variance Request to Allow Additional
Pylon Sign Square Footage than the Maximum Allowed.
Applicant, Citizono Tack Force.
9:09 P.M. 9. Continuance of Conditional Uoo Request to Allow
Open and Outdoor Storage and Rental Equipmont in
a B-3 (Highway Buoineao) Zone. Applicant, Suburban
Gas, Inc.
Additional Information Items
9:24 P.M. 1. Update to bo Procentod on the Prop000d Now Zoning
Map.
9:29 P.M. 2. Sot the next tentative data for the Monticello
Planning C ommiooion meeting for January 14, 1986,
7:30 p.m.
9:30 P.M. 3. Adjournman t.
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
November 12, 1985 - 6:30 p.m.
Members Present: Joyce Dowling, Richard Carlson, Richard Martie.
Members Absent: Jim Ridgeway, Ed Schaffer.
Staff Present: Gary Anderson, Olive Koropchak, Thomas Eidem,
and Richard Wolfsteller.
The meeting was called to order by Acting Chairperson Richard
Carlson at 6:38 p.m.
Motion by Joyce Dowling, seconded by Richard Carlson, to approve
the minutes of the October 8, 1985, regular Planning Commission
meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
3. Tabled Request Continued - A Conditional Use Request to Allow
a Duplex Addition to be Built onto Existing House - Applicant,
Ken [Arson.
Mr. Ken Larson was not present for public testimony on his Conditional
use request. Zoning Administrator Gary Andarson gave Planning
Commission members some background on Mr. Larson's request. Mr.
Laroon'a cite plane as shown do meet the minimum requirements
of our parking lot ordinance. Acting Chairperson Richard Carlson
open the meeting for input from the public. Mr. Art Dorn quoationed
as to too much being added to this property and that there is
a high amount of traffic in this area because it is next to the
school. lie would like to son the conditional uca roquoot denied.
Mary Jano Puncochar, affected property owner immediately wont
of this proposed site, was present and questioned as to some type
of screening being inotalled along the parking area. Because
the parking lot would be right outside her window, she would like
come typo of screening put in and questioned what type of screening
would be put in if allowed. Without Mr. Larson'o presence, Commission
members were unable to ancwor questions as to what he would be
doing with his existing business, if he intended to keep his business
there or if he would diocontinuo his business at this location
and relocate it.
Motion by Richard Martin, seconded by Joyce Dowling, to deny the
conditional uoo roquoot to allow a duplex addition to be built
onto an existing house. The roacon for Mr. Martio's denial is
that Mr. Larson was not present to answer hlu cuncorno or what
would happen to the existing bucinoos which Mr. Larson oporatoe
out ut a portion of his garage. Motion carried unanimously.
C -Z)
Planning Commission Minutes - 11/12/85
1. Public Hearing - A Variance Request to Allow No Curbing and No
Hard Surfacing in Certain Areas of a Parking Lot - Applicant,
Glass Hut.
Mr. Rick Longley, owner of the Glass Hut, was not present to propose
his variance request. Zoning Administrator Anderson indicated
to Planning Commission members that he had a letter from Mr. Longley
stating he would be unable to attend the meeting, but his letter
would address his proposed request. Zoning Administrator Anderson
indicated to Planning Commission members the areas for which Mr. Longley
requested no curbing and no hard surfacing of the parking lot.
With no input from the public, questions from Commission members
addressed any curbing that was at the current site of his Glass
Hut building. Zoning Adminiatrator Anderson countered that there
is no curbing, but there is hard surfacing right now. Zoning
Administrator indicated to Commission members that should the
proposed warehouse be built on the rear lot behind the Glass Hut
building, and the use change, a site plan of the entire area would
have to be drafted and brought to Planning Commission members
for their approval or denial. The letter from Mr. Longley was
then read by Acting Chairperson Richard Carlson.
Motion by Joyce Dowling, suconded by Richard Carlson, to approve
the variance request to allow no curbing and no hard surfacing
in certain areas of a parking lot as shown on the site plan.
Planning Commission members would like to add the condition that
should the use change for the proposed warehouse on the lot immediately
in back of the Glass Hut building, Mr. Longley would have to submit
to Planning Commission members, for their approval or denial,
a site plan showing the proposed now hard surfaced parking and
curbing of the parking lot for that lot and oleo what ho intends
to do with the curbing of his existing parking lot. At that time,
Planning Commission members could set a time table for construction
of those improvements. Motion carried unanimously.
5. Public Hearing - A Variance Roquoot to Allow Off -Strout Parking
in the 5 -foot Setback Requirement of a Parking Lot - Applicant,
Raindonco Partnership.
Mr. Godlowoki, ropresenting Voit Construction Company, partner
in the Raindanco Partnership, was present to propose their variance
roquoot to allow them to park vehicles in the prop000d now parking
lot within the 5 -foot setback requirement. In the site plan estimate,
it shows whore the parking on the oast and vont aides of the proposed
parking lot would extend right to the property line. Also, as
proposed on the site plan, Sixth Street would be constructed in
the area, with 80 foot of Sixth Street right-of-voy and approximately
36 foot of asphalt driving ourfaco, the Raindanco Corporation
io proposing to park within 10 feet of this Sixth Street hard
road ourfaco. Planning Commission members quootionsd as to where,
-2-
v
Planning Commission Minutes - 11/12/85
if any, there would be green areas. Zoning Administrator Anderson
indicated there would be green area between the proposed parking
lot and the existing Cedar Streets and Highway 25 and 6th Street.
A motion by Joyce Dowling, seconded by Richard Martie, to approve
the variance request to allow off-street parking in the 5 -foot
setback requirement of a parking lot. Motion carried unanimously
with Jim Ridgeway and Ed Schaffer absent.
Planning Commission Resolution 85-1 was a resolution approving
the Monticello Redevelopment Project Plan Tax Increment Financing
Plan N6. A motion by Joyce Dowling, seconded by Richard Carlson,
to approve Planning Commission Resolution 85-1. The motion carried
unanimously with Jim Ridgeway and Ed Schaffer absent.
Planning Commission Resolution 65-2 was a resolution approving
the Monticello Redevelopment Project Plan with modification N2
and Tax Increment Financing Plan 07. Motion by Joyce Dowling,
seconded by Richard Carlson, to approve Planning Commission Resolution
85-2. Motion carried unanimously with Jim Ridgeway and Ed Schaffer
absent.
6. Public Hearing - A Conditional Use Request to Allow Open and Outdoor
Storage and Rental Equipment in a B-3 (Highway Business Zone) -
Appllcant, Suburban Gas.
Mr. John Cross, Manager, Suburban Gas Company was present to propose
to be allowed to establish a U -Haul rental business on their Suburban
Goo site. The trailers for the U-11aul business and the rental
equipment, hitches etc., will be stored in the fenced in area
of their existing cite. Thu U -Haul trucks will be stored outside
of the fence in the northeast corner of their site. The proposed
site plan as submitted, City Staff addressed a proposed screening
fence along the existing screening fence on the north side of
the property. Also within the screening fonce we looked at the
applicant, Suburban Gas, installing hard surfacing of their parking
lot. Commission member Richard Carlson questioned as to why the
entire area woo not oat up for screening as they have additional
propane tanks stored outside of the existing fenced in area.
Mr. Ed Smith, a resident in the audience questioned as to the
safety of the trailers and the people backing the trailers in
and around the propane tank. Mr. Croon countered that the proposed
renters of those trailers aro only allowed to back up to the troller
after it is towed out of the existing fence enclosure. That his
personnel take caro of putting the trailers back in and removing
them from the fenced in area. Thio area being it is a highly
visible area and proposed development across the street with the
now Claus Foods complex and rental retail opo -.o, Commission members
felt that the entire area should be looked at, and therefore in
a motion by Richard Martin, seconded by Joyce Dowling, to table
the conditional use request to allow open and outdoor storage
and rental equipment in a B-3 (Highway Buoincoo Zone). Reasoning
for the tabling of the request is that the applicant work with
City staff to come up with a proposed screening layout for the
entire property which Suburban Goo currently looses from Burlington
Northern. The motion carried unanimously with Jim Ridgeway and
Ed Schaffer absent.
Planning Commission Minutes - 11/12/85
7. Public Hearing.- A Variance Request to Allow Placement of a Sign
in the Railroad Right-of-way - Applicant, John Sandberg.
Mr. Sandberg was present to propose his request to allow his Par
West Addition sign to remain where it is currently located. Location
of the proposed sign is currently on the railroad right-of-way.
Mr. Sandberg has not received a written statement from the Burling ton
Railroad Company yet allowing him the placement of this sign.
Planning Commission members did acknowledge a letter submitted
from Public Works Director John Simola addressing his concerns
on the placement of this existing sign. Mr. Simola had attempted
to have Mr. Sandberg _move that sign onto his own property as
it was in vim latfon of our sign ordinance and that it was on
other property owner - a property, citing examples where we have
made other developers move their signs onto their own property.
Motion by Richard Martie, seconded by Joyce Dowling, to table
the variance request to allow placement of a sign in a railroad
right-of-way. Reason for tabling the request is that without
any written permission from the railroad there would be no need
for a variance at this time as we are not the property owner where
the sign is Located. The motion carried unanimously with Jim
Ridgeway and Ed Schaffer absent.
B. Public Hearing - A Re -zoning request to re -zona from R1 Single
Family Residential to R2 (Single and Two Family Residential),
and R-2 Single and Two Family Residential to R-3 (Medium Desity
Residential). A Requae t to Roplat Existing R1 and R2 Lots into
R-3 Lots - Applicant, John Sandberg.
Mr. John Sandberg was present to propose a ro-zoning of existing
R1 Lots into R3 Multiple Family Lots. Zoning Administrator Anderson
shoved to concerned citizens that were present, the area affected
by the ro-zoning requoot and the re -platting request. Mr. Sandberg
entered into his presentation indicating the need for ouch development
of an existing new development which to approximately five yearn
old and vary little construction activity a Lroady at this site.
What he is proposing to do is to be allowed to ro-zona portiono
of the Meadows Addition. If allowed to ra-zono portions of the
Meadows Addition, he would like to re -plat it into multiple family
housing loco for placement of apartment buildings on said Iota.
Acting Chairman Richard Carlson opened it up for any input from
the public and Mr. Jeff Warwao, apokooporaon representing the
group of 79 concerned homoowncro was present to present a petition
of the signature of those 79 concerned homeownora. Mr. Warwao
q uootionod whether or not there had boon a otudy made to indicate
that there woo a need for multiple family dwellings. Colleen
Mikkoloon, r--oncornod resident, opoko of her concern for the traffic
turning land a stopping for traffic being compounded more by the
additional traffic. Mr. Jeff Houoologo spoke of his concerns
in regards to closing of thio street diverting the traffic to
Marvin Elwood Road. Mr. Bob Dayloo spoke of hio concern in regards
to the oportmento, if they have any kids and there not being any
parka available for those. Mr. Ed Smith oxpre000d hio concern
of the property value of hio currant dwelling should apartments
be built, ao wall so, incroaaod crime in the area with the influx
of restore into those prop000d apartment buildings.
-4-
�o
Planning Commission Minutes - 11/12/85
Marge Smith related to the accident involving two children already
on Pairie Road. Mr. Sandberg tried to answer as many of the concerns
from the public as he could. Commission member Joyce Dowling
having to leave the meeting for another meeting left at approximately
9:30 p.m. Mr. Sandberg reinterated his concerns for the developing
of his proposed project indicating the need for apartment buildings
to accommodate the influx of shorting of residential housing unite
available in the City of Monticello and, also, his concerns for
tiering of the proposed zoning changes which he is looking for.
In the tiering of the use zone as presented he intends to go from
R3 to I1 as being a buffer zone and also the single family zone
to the east being another buffer zone for this proposed re -zoning
request. The recommendation of the two Commission members present,
Mr. Richard Carlson, acting Chairperson, and Mr. Richard Martie
was to table the request until the next regularly scheduled meeting
of the Monticello Planning Commission proposed for December 3,
1985 at 7:30 p.m.
Planning Commission Review of the Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment
to the City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance.
The two Planning Commiosion members present, acting Chairperson
Richard Carlson, and Planning Commission member Richard Martie
ace no problem with recommending that the proposed zoning amendments
to the City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance be passed onto City
Council for their approval or denial.
Additional Information Items
1. The consensus of the two members present, Richard Carlson
and Richard Martie,oct the next tentative data for the Monticello
Planning Commission for December 3, 1985, at 7:30 p.m.
2. Consensus of the two members present that the meeting be adjourned.
The mooting adjourned at 9:48 p.m.
Reopectfully oubmltted,
�� ^�
Cary Anderson
Zoning Administrator
m
Planning Commission Agenda - 12/3/85
3. Public Hearing - A Conditional Use Request to Allow an Office
Business in a Proposed New Zone, PZM (Performance Zone Mixed).
Applicant, Seestrom Company. (G.A.)
Mr. Seestrom has asked that this item be tabled and put on the
agenda of another meeting in the future.
10
Planning Commission Agenda - 12/3/85
4. Public Hearing - A Replattinq Request to Allow Construction of
a Zero Lot Line Duplex on Existing Lots. Applicant, Vic Hellman. (G.A.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Mr. Vic Hellman is proposing to replat existing Lots 2 6 3, Block 44,
Original Plat Addition, City of Monticello, into two lots accommodating
a zero lot line duplex. In the replat of the existing lots, you
will note on the site plan that Lots 2 6 3, which face north and
south, will be replatted with one lot on the north part of Lots
2 6 3, and one lot on the south part of 2 6 3. As you will note
on the site plan, we will have access to Broadway for Lot 2, which
will be the lot replatted in the north part of Lots 2 6 3. This
10 -foot land area strip will accommodate land ownership with Lot 2
so as not to create a land -locked lot. The proposed duplex does
meet all of the minimum setback requirements and lot square footage
and building square footage requirements.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Approve the roplatting request to allow construction of a
zero lot line duplex on existing lots.
2. Deny the roplatting request.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the replotting request of Late 2 6 3
to be replotted to allow construction of a zero lot lino duplax.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the location of the roplatting requeot; Copy of the site
plan showing proposed roplatting of Lots 2 6 3, Block 44.
-2-
------------------
7
Replatting request to allow
construction Of a zero lot line
T-' P duplex on existing lots -
Vic Hallman.
N110, 11
4w
I
'14
Planning Commission Agenda - 12/3/85
5. Public Hearing - A Replatting Request to Allow Construction of
a Zero Lot Line Duplex on Existing Lots. Applicant, Jerry Barthel. (G.A.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
In review of this replatting request by City Staff, it is the
recommendation of the City staff that there be simple subdivisions
of these existing lots to allow for construction of a zero lot
line duplex on these existing lots. These could be entered as
separate requests on Lots 8, 9, and 10. with the simple subdivisions
as indicated on the enclosed site plan, we note that the •,etba,;ks
have been met to allow construction of the proposed zero lot line
duplex, and also does allow for the existing residents on Lot 8
to coma into conformance with our now setback requl.remernts, with
their actual new west lot line being at least 10 Last from the
house.
'"M.1 F,"ZT11M#►1Mdl➢@(IU4
1. Approve the simple subdivision request to subdivide existing
Lots 9 G 10 into two separate lots with separate legal descriptions.
2. Deny the subdivision request to allow the subdivision of Lots
8 6 9 into two separate building lots.
C. STAFF RECOMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of tho simple subdivision requests for
Lots 9 6 10. With the simple subdivision of those Iota, it will
allow conotruction of a zero lot lino duplex and also allow existing
Lot 8 to coma into conformance with the setback requirements.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the location of the proposed simple subdivision roquoot;
Copy of the oite plan showing proposed simple subdivisions.
-3-
Ye��ee a to a�p1e* o e10.04
\ ¢eplet2 co lot lio
e
\
lots*
�ttpel•
t
r4 L
'r,j J•t1 , r• (l "4�1 ' r.
is '\ 00.3 ,.�'• •4.: -�•..i `r...,�"',� �"�-:.( •
�.�-.04
oo .0
Nr i r«";': •..'� • , � . err,
...���
.'(� j''0` � \ '�"y � �; .., . ""ice � t �•(,^,^/�+.,;�) ' "`.•.:.
•e:'".--""i '` • ��4 .1,.1t.• z'r J �' p •:.r ''�;t4 r •' "�+.i.l�
as r.
.� .✓iRTNWi>ldlc ✓ �•t nc.✓: sw rsvr l 1
+I.:\ •<� �� / NMrw S.�I.9Tdfi. ✓ t.wi v/ .�ue.0 w.� J
IFZ
R
Owl
PAR ,
3 A
9 r ; PARpCEL
i , ti5 '•��6d.• 1y
,a
fr* � • Y b
PARCEL �/
,�rnv oAJ retsr c..V� as st2 oaK ��
s9 � r 4r� , � • r-Y� sr
k .a PAR ;
A {;' g
9 PAR EL
t�
is i •.• ,,y
ms's l/j to
4 r- Styr
41 Q
PARCEL yy ~
C I
�1
Planning Commission Agenda - 12/3/85
6. Public Hearing - A Replattincq Request to Replat an Existing Lot
into Eivht Townhouse Lots and One Common Area Lot. Applicant,
Jay Miller. (G.A.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Mr. Jay Millar, co-owner in Colony By The Greens townhouse development,
Par Nest Addition, City of Monticello, is proposing to replat
existing Block 0, Lot 9, into eight individual townhouse lots
with one common area lot. In the replatting of this existing
lot, we note that the minimum setback requirements have been met.
As you will note, the lots extend into the front setback requirement
and the side setback requirement, but the buildings on these late
do not extend into this setback requirement.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Approve the replatting request to replat an existing lot into
eight townhouse lots and one common area lot.
2. Deny the replatting request.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of this replatting request to replat
an existing lot into eight townhouse lots and a common area lot.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the location of the townhouno lot; Copy of the roplat
of the oxioti ng lot.
-4-
:EMN
A..
Aeplatting request to replat an Mating
lot into eight townhouse lots and one common
area lot,
Jay Niuer
GOVT LCT
1
t
0
---8 89.2s' 02' w
212.00---
-`
^t1
9u1w s MIn.Mwt.
C—tr .1 wripht
t
IM bnpelrq IMlwntnl
1 i
�
... pww... M M+.t l•wn++- ,,,•
Ylli.r, Nu.b.IM 4nd •II.
0
..
Hrri OYw ,, S•o- Cor-w
25 t6
lS,b6
•w i'IG'w
94.14
ti.66
`,i
27
t9 - -
11.14 14.14
!u♦
i
8
\
gx
Slot. d
U
—lY of W,luhl
�M
to
i.
wh •w»OYw
iM ilw+ptlip In.truwwnl
Nrti Of w
.0.14
0.-1. S..0-4, C•4hYr
014
-014".1$
Of w
w
• •wa•lu'w$ •�
0
g �
»$
r
e w
w h
w
G
1 fnr.LY Y i1.411 i
fMt t
i[col40Of11TIh.
i?
•
h :of
•rry1 ynErrlM of • I.el
<41n'wGiir Gwtiprutt0 m t
C
W
"
S •eR
p g
4f
�
M
24002400".+•4.1
941 00
1400, t• 00
2900
^
2e40 9400
w
o
•
N
21.1. M t.
W
Y1
�.(
;
Ctlun1Y Mff wrip"1p111
f—wtnp IY•WyR'•
,.,
9YI.4Y'.., MInn.Ml• Ll—
~
� 9
t
L
1,
Thl• 0101 Of COLONY 9Y
I.Mtin9 MIG Ohl.—d-v
`�
I
r w+•r Iwo+'= �.
TW4 01•t d COLONY tT
t
=p.r.p
...
�-
•�
•M
.1 • llnp MIG Ihl$�
i
•
7
�% -'- —'•'— —' k"
-•-ses• as, 02• w
=12.00•••
t."I1Y0 4M ..ctlwww.he..
Planning Commlaslon Agenda - 12/3/85
7. Public Hearing - A Variance Request to Allow Additional Pylon
Sign Square Footage than the Maximum Allowed and a Request to
Allow a Non -conforming Sign to be Erected. Applicant, Burger
King. (G.A.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The Burger King Corporation is proposing to erect a higher pylon
sign on a longer length pylon post. Also on this pylon post they
would like to put up a reader message board. This new pylon sign
would exceed the maximum required by ordinance by 56 feet. The
maximum allowed is 200 sq. ft., and the sign would be approximately
91 feet in height. The reader board portion of this proposed
now sign would be approximately 224 sq. ft. We do allow time
and temperature reader signs for banks and other governmental
buildings, but not on business buildings.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Approve the variance request to allow additional pylon sign
square footage and allow this non -conforming reader message
board to be erected.
2. Deny the variance request to allow additional pylon sign square
footage and to allow this non -conforming reader message board
to be erected.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends at this time denial of the request for additional
pylon sign square footage and the addition of thio non -conforming
reader moosago board. The reason for the denial is that staff
fools that we are far exceeding the maximums that are required,
and we fail to sea the hardship in this case. Also, we would
be totting a procedonco to allow construction of this toador message
board.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of location of variance request; Copy of cite plan showing
the pylon sign with reader message board.
-5-
Z 7Z
���fl., +�• ~�� 1 - variance Request to allow additional
ub j
Loa sign square footage than the
mum allowed and a request to
+ R
nonconforming sign to be
erected.
Burger King
�•t .� !f/;' / •/flit C: r y f G" ,1 `-
iJ�>++f' s t �„� r. �lfj/:�•Cj�Jf�jf/. f.. .f "`LV � � > fA•�\ � �'
, iY • +
`I a
a+p t
� J
1
� S1
L rs:1._F�cA iTl.
r_ P�
t�ncKI
� S1
L rs:1._F�cA iTl.
Planning Commission Agenda - 12/3/85
112� 8. Public Hearing - A Variance Request to Allow Additional Pylon
Sign Square Footage than the Maximum Allowed. Applicant, Citizens
Task Force. (G.A.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Citizens Task Force, a group of Monticello City residents, is
proposing to be allowed additional sign square footage for a pylon
sign to be erected at the Monticello Junior/Senior High School
property. The maximum allowed is 50 sq. ft. of sign area. To
put up a 5 -line message pylon sign, the area of sign needed would
be 60 sq. ft. Therefore, they need a 10 -foot variance. They
are also looking at the possibility of a 7 -line message pylon
sign, which would be an 8-x10- sign and would need 84 sq. ft.
of sign area.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Approve the variance request to allow additional pylon sign
square footage.
2. Deny the variance request.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of variance request to grant additional
' square footage within reason to allow construction of a message
pylon sign at the Monticello Public School.
I
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of location of proposed variance request; Copy of the proposed
messago pylon sign.
-6-
vasLas' g19T' � t
,i!�:' v91pD all Fo�B
rt�J���•ci��,j�TFj �, •r i � • ;�Jr` ',1}r(,j(fl(� t A r ��•\
.•H -"' � f :.� ��(J-�., i * � 1 r 1.
.,�•+.-=:J r•�,'Y;�Iq ' %, .�7`�, 1 _ � �titTl'1 j� , �.! � o ,L r .'.'r� T-��`�r�;
'�-•�-..,�� t jj�+�y./�'!,../�7]7 `�+1•Gf r +',j:{�j�j'y'� . [�l7(//y/I�('!�J( /! �. J j �jt� J f
p.t ti'����� � • J����Lr�yI. • , �tt �4.!'.'W •�) � {i. •:. J
.7C . _ RC1 t7�,• r �``" �`?-,.,•� �_ '�-'`j„�jt').jjj( ""�? .,1.• •l� _V .'!li(!` �`', f 6.; � � r
it ; ('jg�w., f j i,,.. �• � �' ry � ,� . �• x,•! !'-'�. 3yG � 0 0
..?'. �� �i . pi • 1 J ter;.. J � ```�"—
No. 94 t `
d
�\ Ot.
_---Etwr
Monticello'
4T
_ -
1
Sch.pol-District
88Z
-T
D
_---Etwr
Planning Commission Agenda - 12/3/85
y. Update on the Conditional Use Request to Allow Open and Outdoor
Storage and Rental Equipment in a B-3 (Highway Business Zone).
Applicant, Suburban Gee, Inc. (G.A.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND
This morning City Administrator Thomas Eiden and myself met with
the manager of the Suburban Gas Facility in Monticello. Enclosed
you will find a copy of a proposed site plan indicating some landscaping
requirements we are looking for. We are looking at a screening
fence in the front of approximately 60 feet in total length, and
e screening fence to the vest of the existing fence of approximately
150 feet in length. Heavy dark spots indicate tree plantings
and the smaller ones indicate shrubs. With the maximum number
of spaces allowed for trailer perking to be at ton. With the
new enclosed area in the yellow dashed marks indicating space
for three rental trucks and also screening of an existing semi -trailer
at this facility.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
1. To approve the conditional use request to allow open and outdoor
storage and rental equipment in a B-3 zone.
2. To deny the conditional use request to allow open and outdoor
otorago and rental equipment in a B-3 zone.
3. To approve the conditional uoe request to allow open and outdoor
otorago and rental equipment in a B-3 zone with the following
conditions:
A. A ocrooning fence of approximately 60 foot in length be
inotalled in the front and a ocrooning fence of approximately
150 foot in length be inatallod to the voot of Cho existing
ocrooned in facility. This fence is to be a minimum of
6 foot in hoighth and no more than B foot in hoighth,
and to be of a solid acroaning wood typo fence.
B. Soma typo of tree planting and shrub planting ao prop000d
on the oncl000d cite plan.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff rocommondo approval of thio conditional use roquoat with
a time limit Got on to when the tree plantingo and the acraoning
fence will be inatallod oo indicated in a).tornativo action 13.
we do recognize that we will not be acraoning the oxioting omallor
tanka which aro located to the wont of the existing foncod in area.
0. SUPPORTING DATA
A copy of the colored plot plan.
Planning Commission Agenda - 12/3/85
9. Continuance of Conditional Use Request to Allow Open and Outdoor
Storage and Rental Equipment in a B-3 (Highway Business) Zone.
Applicant, Suburban Gas, Inc. (G.A.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The City staff will be meeting with the owners of Suburban Gas
on Monday, December 2. Because of schedule conflicts, we have
not been able to get together with the owners of Suburban Gas
since your last meeting. We will at that time, however, come
up with a recommendation for you for approval or denial of their
conditional use request. At this time, there will be no alternative
actions, staff recommendation, or supporting data.
-7-
E N D
I, the undersigned, an employee of Mid-America
Business Systems hereby certify that the microfilm
images ending with P(`' )_) /.') A k )-
are complete and accurate reproductions of the
original records of i.li.� �� } / ) )h n h uOb n
as accumulated during the regular course of
business, and that it is the established policy
and practice of Mid-America Business Systems
to microfilm records for permanent file.
It is further certified that the photographic
process used for microfilming the above records
were accomplished in a manner and on microfilm
which meets the recommended requirements of the
National Bureau of Standards of permanent micro-
graphic reproduction.
Name Da to