Loading...
Planning Commission Agenda Packet 08-03-1982AGENDA REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELW PLANNING COMMISSION August 3, 1982 - 7:30 P.M. Chairman: Jim Ridgeway. Members: Joyce Dowling, Ed Schaffer, Bill Burke, John Bondhus. 1. Approval of the Minutes for the Regular Meeting Held on July 13, 1982. 2. Public Hearing - Joel Fxickson. 3. Public Hearing - Variance - Jim Fuller. 4. Public Hearing - Variance - Doug Stokes. 5. Public Hearing - Ordinacc Amendment - Architectural Controls in a (R Diotrict). 6. Public Hearing - Ordinance Amendment - Establishment of a "R-5" Zone. 7: Public Hearing - Variance - wrightco Products. S. Public Roaring - Ro zone, Subdivide and Conditional Use - Jim Boyle. 9. Public Hearing - Rc zona, Subdivide and Conditional Use - Mike Rohor. 10. Now Businces. 11. Meeting Reminder. The next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commisoion will be hold on Septembo r 14, 1982. Planning Commission Agenda - 8/3/82 AGENDA SUPPLEMENT 1. Approval of the Minutes for the Meeting Held on July 13, 1982. 2. Public Hearing - Joel Erickson - Variance. Joel and Janet Erickson who live at 406 West 4th St. (Lot 7, Block 20 - Original Plat) would like to build a screened in deck to within 3 feet of the easterly property line of their residence. Their property is zoned I-1. In order to expand this deck on the residential use, a variance is required since this residential use in within an I-1 (Industrial) Zone. Also, the Erickson's would like to have a 3 foot set back Lather than 30 feet that is required. Because a variance is requirod for both setback and residential use within an I-1 zone, public hearing notices have been sent to every- one required within 350 fact. As of this date, no comment either in favor of or against this proposal has been received. APPLICANT, Joel Erickson. CONSIDERATION: Consider granting a variance for a 3 foot act back as requested and also the variance to allow the expansion of thin screened in deck in an I-1 zone. REFERENCES: An enclosed plot map showing the location of the Erickson property within that I-1 zone and also a plot plan of the property slowing the location of the proposed deck. - 1 - Planning Commission Agenda - 8/3/82 3. Public Hearing - variance - Jim Fuller. During May of 1979, Jim Fuller who lives at 800 West Broadway (Lot 6, Block 42) made an application to build an addition on the side of his home. Because a corner lot requires a set back of 20 feet, Mr. Fuller's addition would need a variance of 3 foot, 3 inches into that side yard setback, leaving only 16 feet, 9 inches. At that Planning Commission meeting in May of 1979, the Planning Commission recommended granting the variance to Mr. Fuller in order to build the 24 X 20 addition to his existing home. At the following Council meeting in May of 1979, the Council voted to grant that variance for the same. At this time, Mr. Fuller is required to request reconsideration of his variance since it has been over one year since his variance was granted. At this time, Mr. Fuller is requesting that the Planning Commission reconsider regranting his previously granted variance and that he be allowed at this time to go ahead with his building project for his addition. APPLICANT: James Fuller. CONSIDERATION: Consider approving or denying Mr. Fuller's request for the extension of hin variance to bu ild the addition onto his home. RL'FERENCESs An enclosed plot plan showing the proposed addition to Mr. Fuller's home and also a map showing the location of Mr. Fuller's prcporty within the City of Monticollo. - 2 - Planning Commission Agenda - 8/3/82 4. Public Hearing - Variance - Douq Stokes. Doug Stokes, who owns Lot 1, Block 1 of the Manhattan Lots on east County Road 39 has made a request to be able to build a garage on the front side of his house that would come within 10 feet of the front yard property line. 30 feet is normally required in this R-1 zoning district. Nr. Stokes would like to be able to build his garage approximately 20 feet away from the house and in order to do so would have to have a variance of 20 feet so that he could be within 10 feet of the front yard property line. Public hearing notices have been sent to all people who are required to receive them regarding this matter and as of this date no comments in favor of or opposed to this variance have boon received. APPLICANT: Doug Stokes. CONSIDERATIO14: Consider granting approval or denying this variance request. REF'ERENCESt An enclosed map showing the location of the Stoke's property and also a plot plan showing the location of the pro- posed garage in relationship to the property linen affected. - 3 - Planning Commission Agenda - 8/3/82 5. Public Hearing - Ordinance Amendment - Architectural Controls in a (R Di strict) . Because of a recent State law which requires that all communities allow manufactured homes within the residential zoning districts in which they can meet the architectural control requirements, it is necessary for Monticello to develop an ordinance of architect- ural controls within the residential zoning districts. A work outline is enclosed in this agenda supplement which includes some suggested considerations for amending the residential district architectural controls. Rather, than repeat them here in this part of: the supplement, refer to the work outline as is enclosed which includes a definition of a mobile home. APPLICANT: City of Monticello - CONSIDERATION: Consider amending the zoning ordinance in regard to the residential districts with architectural controls as are proposed on the work line included in the supplemental as well as a dofinition of a mobile home and a definition of a manu- facturad houoing. REFERENCE: Enclosed work outline ao discussed previously. - 4 - planning Commission Agenda - 8/3/82 6. Public Hearing - Ordinance Amendment - Establishment of a "R-5" Zone. The same legislation in the previously discussed agenda item is the legislation which prompts the City of Monticello to need a "R-5, manufactured housing district" zone. One of the reasons the City of Monticello should be considering a new R-5 zoning district is that it would be a zoning district with zoning requirements which are just slightly less in requirements than the other zoning districts, that is; R-1 through R-5, and there- fore, hopefully would make an area which would be more attractive to the placement of manufactured homes. For instance , a mini- mum lot size for detached units would be 7,000 square feet whereas in a R-1 zone, that same requirement would be 12,000 square feet and an R-2 zone that would be 10,000 square feet. As was the same in the previously discussed item, a work item is enclosed for your review and consideration for use in adopt- ing a zoning district for R-5, manufactured housing. If the zoning district R-5 is adopted, it would be appropriate that the Boyle property be zoned,at least in part to our R-5 so that this property would then be more attractive to individuals wanting to own manufactured housing. APPLICANT. The City of Monticello. CONSIDERATION. Consider adopting a now zoning district, "R-5, manufactured housing district". REFERENCES: An enclosed work outline with zoning diattict re- quiremento for your consideration and also a definition of a manufactured housing unit for your consideration and adoption as part of a now zoning district. - 5 - Planning Commission Agenda - 8/3/82 1. Public Hearinq - Variance - Wrightco. Because of increased sales, it is necessary that Wrightco Products develop another truck loading/unloading dock on the east side of the old creamery building on the Wrightco complex. In order to h ave that second loading door, it is necessary that a driveway wider than 24 feet be allowed along that property to accommodate the movement of the trucks. Also, it is necessary to consider allowing trucks to back into the loading dock from off the street rather than from onsite as is required by Monticello ordinance. Because of the tightness of roam in the area which this loading dock needs to built, it would be somewhat difficult and rather expensive to develop a loading dock which would meet all of the ordinance requirements. Mr. Ridgeway of Wrightco Products will be available at the meeting of the Planning Coamission to discuss this item for consideration. APPLICANT: Wrightco Products. CONSIDERATION: Consider granting approval or denial of this vari- ance request for a driveway wider than 24 feet and to allow trucks to back into the loading dock from the street. REFERENCES: An enclosed map showing the location of Wrightco Products and also a plot plan of tho area involved showing the proposed loading dock. — 6 - Planning Commission Agenda - 8/3/82 8. Public Hearing - Rezone, Subdivide and Conditional Use - Jim Boyle. 9. Public Hearinq - Rezone, Subdivide and Conditional Use - Mika Reher. Basically, these concept hearings will be a duplication of in- formation previously presented to you by the developer, but this will be a public hearing where the public can comment on the concept if they desire. APPLICANTS: Jim Boyle and Mike Reher. CONSIDERATION: Consider accepting the concept and allowing the dcveloper to proceed with the planning and preparation for the development stage hearing. REFERENCES: Refer to previously sumbitted agenda supplements on this same subject. 10. Now Bunineso. 11. Meeting Rcmindor. The next regularly schoduled meeting of the Planning Commission will be hold on September 10, 1982. - 7 -