Planning Commission Agenda Packet 04-12-1988AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, April 12, 1988 - 7:30 p.m.
Members: Richard Carlson, Joyce Dowling, Richard Martie, Cindy Lemm,
Daniel McOonnon
7:30 p.m.
1. Call to Order.
7:32 p.m.
2. Approval of Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held March 8, 1988.
7:34 p.m.
3. Public Hearing - A variance request to allow a loading berth
to be oonstructed in the public right-of-way setback
requirement. Applicant, Automatic Garage Door Company.
8:09 p.m.
4. Public Hearing - A variance request to allow construction of a
garage addition within the sideyard setback requirement.
Applicant, Harvey Kendall.
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION ITEMS
8:24 p.m.
1. Planning Commission applicant interviews. Council action:
Appointed one of the Planning Commission's recommendations.
8:26 p.m.
2. Tabled request for a final plat review of a proposed new
subdivision plat. Applicant, City of Monticello. Council
action: Approved as per Planning Commission recommendation.
8:28 p.m.
3. Sketch plan review of a proposed new subdivision plat.
Applicant, Kent Kjellberg. Council action: No Council action
needed, as the request was tabled by the Planning commission.
8:30 p.m.
4. Additional discussion on an upcoming zoning seminar.
8:40 p.m.
5. Set the next tentative date for the Monticello Planning
Ooamission meeting for May 10, 1988, 7:30 p.m.
8:42 p.m.
6. Adjournment.
I
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, March 8, 1988 - 7:30 p.m.
Members Present: Richard Carlson, Joyce Dowling, Richard Martie, Cindy Lemm
Members Absent: None
Staff Present: Gary Anderson, Rick Wolfsteller, Jeff O'Neill
1. The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Richard Carlson at
7:32 p.m.
2. Motion was made by Cindy Leven, seconded by Richard Martie, to approve the
minutes of the regular meeting held February 9, 1988. Motion carried
unanimously.
3. Planning Commission Applicant Interviews.
Zoning Administrator, Gary Anderson, indicated to Planning Commission
members the procedure that would be used for the interview process with
the Planning Commission member applicants. Anderson explained to the
Planning Commission members each of the applicants present and that one,
Mr. William Weisbrod, would not be present this evening but still would
like to have his name considered as a possible Planning Commission
member. Planning Commission members interviewed each of the Planning
Commission member applicants present, those being Mr. Patrick Faltersack,
Ms. Candi Thilquist, Mr. Dan McConnon, and Mr. Chris Donnell. After the
interview process, Chairperson Richard Carlson thanked the applicants for
attending the meeting and that they were all very well qualified
applicants for the Planning Commission position. Zoning Administrator,
Gary Anderson, representing all of the City staff, wished to thank all of
the Planning Commission member applicants for attending tonight's meeting
and that they were certainly welcome to stay for the rest of the Planning
Commission meeting, and that they would be cent a letter indicating the
time at which they would be interviewed by the Monticello City Council
members at their meeting on March ld, 1988. No decision was rendered by
the Planning Commission members at Lhis meeting.
d. Tabled Re
.guest for a Final Plat Review of the Proposed New Subdivision
Plat. Applicant, City of Monticello.
Zoning Administrator Anderson indicated to Planning Commisoion members
and residents in attendance the City's proposed now subdivision plat to
be known as Oakwood Industrial Park Second Addition. The City purchased
Lots 9 and 10, Block 2, Oakwood Industrial Park, from the Oakwood
Industrial Park Partnership to create six smaller lots ranging in size
from 1.2 acres to 2.3 acres. With no input from the public and also no
further input from the Planning Commisoion members present, motion was
made by Joyce Dowling, seconded by Richard Martio, to approve the final
Tlat fcr a proposed now subdivision plat. Motion carried unanimously.
O
Planning Commission Minutes - 3/8/88
Sketch Plan Review of a Proposed New Subdivision Plat. Applicant, Rent
R7ellberg.
Chairperson Richard Carlson opened the agenda item, not clearly
understanding the applicant's request when there are some things that
haven't been completed as per City staff. Zoning Administrator Anderson
indicated to Planning Commission members that the developer,
Mr. Rjellberg, is proposing to plat part of unplatted land currently in
the Township into residential single and two-family residential
development, mobile home park development, and also some commercial type
development within the approximate 160 acre unplatted tract of land.
Zoning Administrator Anderson indicated that Mr. Jeff O'Neill, Assistant
City Administrator, would present on behalf of the City some of the
City's concerns outlining the entire proposed development for them to
brief them on the applicant's sketch plan request.
Mr. O'Neill explained to Planning Commission members the staff's concern
over the proposed area layout. The first concern of the City staff was
that the property has been approved by the Municipal Board for annexation
into the City even though the City has not received those official papers
yet. Secondly, the Monticello City Council has not acted formally on
whether or not to accept this plat into the City. The developers have
come up with a lot and block layout on this entire unplatted tract of
land prior to the City establishing some type of zoning for this proposed
unplatted land currently in Monticello Township. Mr. O'Neill referenced
to the City's Comprehensive Plan which showed how a proposed trail system
and a proposed arterial road were to be laid out through this unplatted
tract of land.
Mr. Rick Wolfateller, City Administrator, explained to Planning
Commission members additional City staff concerns as far as the zoning,
which the developers are proposing multi -type zonings within this
unplatted tract of land prior to the City establishing some type of
zoning there before the developers laid out their proposed lots within
the blocks in this unplatted tract of land. Mr. Wolfateller questioned
the location of the proposed trailer park on this proposed sketch plan
request. With the logical power line with the existing southerly most
power line easement which runs through the property, it acts as a natural
buffer from the existing Kjellberg East Trailer Park from the area
proposed to be single and two family residential on this unplatted tract
of land to the north of the southerly most power line easement.
Mr. Wolfateller also explained the developers are proposing that the City
take the entire land under the southerly most power line easement for the
developers portion of the park dedication in land only. City staff is
contending that if we accept any of this land underneath the power line
easement, we would probably accept only a 50 -foot strip through the power
line easement for the establishment of some sort of trail system through
this area. Chairperson Richard Carlson questioned how the utilities
would be laid out to serve this property. Zoning Administrator Anderson
indicated on the sketch plan there are three different ways of serving
9
Planning Commission Minutes - 3/8/88
the property depending on how the developer would choose to service the
property and how far south he would go beyond the proposed area to be
annexed into the City. Zoning Administrator Anderson also questioned
Mr. Dennis Taylor, Taylor Land Surveyors, the firm which has drawn up the
sketch plan for the developer, Mr. Kent Kjellberg, as to what they were
proposing for screening around their proposed trailer park. Mr. Taylor
indicated that the developer, Mr. Kent Kjellberg, was proposing to plant
rows, ut pine trees around the entire area of the trailer park which would
abut single and two family residential zoning. Mr. Jeff O'Neill wanted
to reiterate that the City's Comprehensive Plan was here prior to this
proposed development and that certainly amendments could be made to the
Comprehensive Plant but basically, the developer should have developed
their development around the trailways and the proposed arterial road as
were laid out to go through parts of this unplatted tract of land.
Mr. Taylor questioned the layout of an arterial road system through this
development in that he felt it was detrimental on the part of the City to
have a main arterial road going through this residential plat.
Mr. Richard Carlson, in summing up the proposed sketch plan request, sees
some major issues that needed to be addressed first. They are as
follows:
1. Whether or not the property will be annexed into the City.
2. That the City apply some type of zoning to this unplatted tract of
land.
3. That the developer lay out his development on this unplatted tract of
land after the City has established some type of zoning to this
unplatted tract of land in the Township.
Chairperson Richard Carlson then opened the meeting for further input
from the Planning Commission members. Mr. Richard Martie indicated he
was in agreement with statements from Mr. Richard Carlson in that he was
in agreement with all of the statements which Mr. Carlson indicated
previously.
Mr. Jeff O'Neill indicated to Planning Commission members that there
could be some possible revisions to the Comprehensive Plan and that the
reason for the arterial road was to create a road system from the
southerly most portion of the middle school property along 118 all the
way over to a possible connection with Highway 25.
commission member, Cindy Gemco, questioned personally not being willing to
purchase a home next to the trailer park. Mr. Olen Pasusta, Kjellberg
Trailer Park Manager, explained Mr. Kjellberg's intent of the mobile home
park development within the single and two-family residential area.
However, if the trailer park was going to be a holdup in the proposed
sketch plan request that the developer, Mr. Kjellberg, would oak that the
City work with him in further annexation proceedings for the development
of land further south of the existing Kjellberg East Trailer Park.
With no further inr%.ir from the public or the Planning Commission members,
motion was made by Richard Martie, seconded by Joyce uowliny, to table
the sketch plan request. Motion carried unanimously.
0
Planning Commission Minutes - 3/8/88
Additional Information Iteom
1. Variance request to allow a proposed residential lot, when platted, to
have less than the minimum lot frontage on a public right-of-way.
Applicant, Charles Ritze. Council action: Denied request as per
Planning Commission recommendation.
2. A tabled request for a preliminary plat review of a proposed new
subdivision plat. Applicant, Charles Ritze. Council action: Denied
request as per Planning Commission recommendation.
3. A conditional use request to allow as a home occupation a beauty shop in
an R-1 (single family residential) zone. Applicant, Karla Dickey.
Council action: Approved request as per Planning Commission
recommendation.
4. A conditional use request to allow construction of more than one building
on an unplatted lot. A conditional use request to allow construction of
an apartment building in excess of the maximum number of units allowed.
Applicant, David Hornig. Council action: Approved request with
conditions as per Planning Commission recommendation.
S. A rezoning request to rezone part of an unplatted tract of land from B-3
(highway business) to PZM (performance zone mixed) zoning. If property
is rezoned, a conditional use request to allow construction of an
apartment building in excess of the maximum number of units allowed.
Applicant, Metcalf and Larson. Council action: Tabled as per
applicant's request.
6. A rezoning request to rezone platted lots from B-4 (regional business) to
PZM (peformance zone mixed) zoning. If property is rezoned, a
conditional use request to allow construction of an apartment building in
excess of the maximum number of units allowed. Applicant, Metcalf and
Larson. Council action: Approved request with conditions as per
Planning Commission recommendation.
7. Motion by Richard Martie, seconded by Joyce Dowling, to set the next
tentative date for the Monticello Planning Commission meeting for
Tuesday, April 12, 1988, 7:30 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
8. MuLlon by Cindy Leman, seconded by Joyce Dowling, to adjourn the meeting.
Motion carried unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 9:09 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
��A"t
Cary Anderson
Zoning Administrator
0
Planning Commission Agenda - 4/12/88
Public Hearing - A variance request to allow a loading berth to be
constructee in the public right-ot-way setnacx requirement. Applicant,
Automatic Garage Door Company. (G.A.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Automatic Garage Door Company, as noted on the enclosed site plan, is
proposing an expansion of their existing building. With the proposed
expansion of their building, the loading/unloading area, which is now
done on the south side of their building, will be redirected to the east
side of their building. With the redirection of their loading/unloading
area to the east side of the proposed building addition, a semi -truck
tractor will have to drive onto our public right-of-way to get backed up
to the unloading dock. The applicant is proposing to be allowed to have
the semi -truck tractor enter from the northeast driveway, come through
their parking lot, and come out their southeast driveway out onto the
public right-of-way of South Cedar Street, and then back up to the
loading dock on the proposed new building addition.
I would encourage each of the Planning Commission members to drive out to
the site to look at the problems the existing site has with the building
elevation in relationship to South Cedar Street. The building was
constructed to be above existing Highway 25 but below the existing South
Cedar Street. With it being allowed to be built that way, we have
problems with surface water drainage coming at a very fast pace against
the curb adjacent to the existing building.
We, as the City staff, have a definite concern with the truck tractor
being allowed to enter into the public right-of-way to back up to the
loading dock area. When the truck tractor is backed up to the loading
dock area, the tractor will be parked approximately 12 feet to 13 feet
onto the boulevard portion of the public right-of-way. We feel that
there are still possibly two other ways to accommodate the
loading/unloading in a different situation within this property. The
first situation would be that a portion of the building addition would be
utilized as the unloading dock area where the semi -trailer would be
backed into a portion of the building to accommodate its
loading/unloading of the semi -trailer. By backing the trailer into a
portion of the building addition when backed up to the unloading dock, it
would be on its own property and not on the City public right-of-way.
But also to accommodate this means the semi -truck tractor still must
drive out onto Cedar Street public right-of-way to back up to the loading
dock.
Tho second situation would be to construct a building addition onto the
southeast corner of the building to accommodate an unloading dock arca.
With this addition, the semi -truck tractor could enter in the southeast
driveway, come up into the parking lot, and then back up to the loading
dock and still be on private property to accommodate the maneuvering to
the loading dock area. In the second situation, we recognize that there
ME
Planning Commission Agenda - 4/12/88
may be some problems with the construction of this building addition in
regards to the elevations which exist of the driveway portion that is
currently used to get back to the existing loading/unloading area. We
also recognize that this is probably the more expensive way to do itt but
in reality, there would not need to be a variance to accomplish this.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Approve the variance request to allow a loading berth to be
constructed within the public right-of-way setback requirement.
2. Deny the variance request to allow a loading berth to be constructed
in the public right--of-way setback requirement.
C. STAFF RECO E NDATION:
This is a very difficult recommendation to make in that we do not want to
discourage expansion of an existing business, but we also do not want to
create a situation which may be a problem at some point in time in the
future. We do believe that there are two other alternatives to the
construction of this building addition for the loading/unloading area
which may or may not need a variance request. We also recognize that the
building was allowed to be constructed in the location that it is and
that the owners of this building have to work with the existing
conditions to accommodate their proposed building addition.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of location of proposed variance request] Copy of the site plan for
proposed variance requeati Copy of the two alternatives for the proposed
variance request] Copy of the ordinance section on loading berths.
-2-
i
�l� :t /�.�;1� .r ' � it ; ;jr! 1 t ' .• 1 •;.::��.,
'+ ,� l .r i. •iftt •n .,. ,;;,�" q•r11; a- I ,•.."".,;=,.: !�'11 ./l
�iw; ��r;. J .! 1�t [(; 1 C r � ;� i•,+ �t'.el..,-'.It�j) { p��•��:, a 'Q `
•� -•"• ti ,. � "y 7!]>�..y�•_,�,, .,, '�f�1"� 1�1,.J -,-�._,�L--••°� .Zn. .,�j'r1,.1. � '�,•;d,:�N.
.r. t \\""ww � h"' • ` '"-„- •"`..•,WWW �• ��^• .
. F �'�•+�7 L(,`�''•y''�'�'tl �,,.. �,r ••"� •�„� 4 p�� •'� app,/',7��[,� • l + \ 1 l' t'' �N,... �•'
'-' ,� • '>1,� :Iii,• r� + '„'-`"z;b1R r r' +l .xi�' 3A
11'��J ' 0
i
to ted ° > t'• f
HIGHWAY _ vasian°Ost� oE"dect+e .. Jllt 'r c.,- �'' i v.• "
A l 1 't
1pIILjl%qa s19h� 0am9°nY• N0. 94 +
60. Door
. i t
2 3 700'
t0
PAOPOSTO AOOtTiON
_.._._ .... ... __�..... FXt5TI1V6 BLOtNd..
♦oXtFO'
/� �^_^ � J sw vl'� �' CYC'=" t:�► 1 � +�!' `.C^?�I �; � ~`
PA rtltltYG
AR
C"
CA
A9 J
� V
277
aoatt .00
1
.Av
y `_ -..._,..may � •••�.. •
2 3 ZOd
_160
pooposec AVDIrlom LrxISTIN& SLOIN6-
6d x 66X 190'
L'Pte
-e-- �-VtvpsssCL S%�fkt
277
Ro,% C OOr
2 3 70d
0.
Id
PAOPOSWD AVDIrto rxisr#Nc. BLIDIN&.
60!x Oso'
9=-"A
cz" Rw3
PA lr�%
CUAG AREA
P112.PIS! CL stl-fkt
............
7. 000
gro"a
wAft
(a) Conditions required for joint use:
1. The building or use for which
application is being made to
utilize the off-street parking
facilities provided by another
building or use shall be located
within three hundred (300) feet of
such parking facilities.
ii. The applicant shall show that
there is no substantial conflict
in the principal operating hours
of the two (2) buildings or
uses for which joint use of
off-street parking facilities
is proposed.
iii. A properly drawn legal instrument,
executed by the parties concerned
for joint use of off-street
parking facilities, duly approved
as to form and manner of execution
by the City Attorney, shall
be filed with the City Administrator
and recorded with the County
Recorder, Wright County.
OFF-STREET LOADING: .
)A) PURPOSE: The regulation of loading spaces
in these Boning regulations is to alleviate
or prevent congestion of the public right -of -ray
and so to promote the safety and general welfare
of the public, by establishing minimum requirements
for off -$treat loading and unloading from motor
vehicles in accordance with the utilisation
of various parcels of land or structures.
)e) LOCATION:
1. All roquirad loading bartho ohall be off-atroot
and located on the same lot as the building
or use to be served.
2. All loading berth curb cuts shall be located,
at a minimum, fifty (50) feet from the
intersection of two (2) or more street
right-of-ways. This distanco shall be
measured from the property line.
2. No loading berth shall be located closer
y than fifty (501 feet from a residential
district unless within a structure.
0
O
4. Loading berths shall not occupy the front
yard setbacks.
S_ Loading bertha located at the front or
at the aide of buildings on a corner lot
shall require a conditional use permit
under the provisions of Chapter 22 of this
Ordinance, and provided that:
(a) Loading berths shall not conflict
with pedestrian movement.
(b) Loading berths shall not obstruct
the view of the public right-of-way
from off-street parking access.
(c) Loading bertha shall comply with all
other requirements of this Section.
6. Each loading berth shall be located with
appropriate means of vehicular access to
a street or public alley in amanner which
will cause the least interference with
traffic.
(C)
SURFACING: All loading berths and accessways
shall be improved with not less than six (6)
inch clean five base and two (2) inch bituminous
surfacing to control the dust and drainage
according to a plan submitted to and subject
to the approval of the City Engineer.
(D)
ACCESSORY USE, PARKING AND STORAGE: Any space
allocated as a required loading berth or access
drive so as to comply with the terms of these
coning regulations shall not be used for the
storage of goods, inoperable vehicles or snow
and shall not be included as part of the space
requirements to most the off-street area.
(E)
SCREENING: Except in the case of multiple
dwollingo all loading areas ohall be ocroonod
and landscape) from abutting and surrounding
residential uses in compliance with Chapter 3,
Section 2 [G) of this Ordinance.
[P)
SIZE: Unless otherwise specified in these
zoning regulations, the first loading berth
shall be not less than fifty-five (55) feet
in length and all loading berths shell be not
less than thirty (30) feet In length. A11
Loading berths shall be not less than ten (10)
feet in width and fourteen (14) feet in height,
exclusive of &Lela and maneuvering specs.
O
(G) NUMBER OF LOADING BERTHS REQUIRED: The number
of required oft -street loading bertha shall
be as follows:
MANUFACTURING, FABRICATION, PROCESSING,
WAREHOUSING, STORING, RETAIL SALES, SCHOOLS,
AND HOTELS: For such a building five thousand
(5,000) to one hundred thousand (100,000)
square feet of floor aro, one (1) loading
berth fifty-five (55) feet in length and
one (1) additional berth for each additional
one hundred thousand (100,000) square feet
or fraction thereof, plus one (1) berth
thirty (30) feet in length for each thirty-five
thousand (35,000) square feet of floor
area or fraction thereof.
2. AUDITORIUM, CONVENTION HALL, EXHIBITION
HALL, SPORTS ARENA, OR STADIUM: Tan thousand
(10,000) to one hundred thousand (100,000)
square feet of floor area, one (1) loading
berth; for each additional one hundred
thousand (100,000) square feet of floor
area or fraction thereof, one (1) additional
loading berth.
0
I
Planning Commission Agenda - 4/12/88
4. Public Hearing - A variance request to allow construction of a garage
addition within the sideyard setback requirement. Applicant, Harvey
Rendall. (G.A.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Mr. Kendall is proposing to construct an addition onto his existing
garage. The proposed addition, 6' x 26', would be within the minimum
sideyard setback requirement on the front, but on the back would be
4 feet short of the minimum setback requirement, which is 10 feet.
On the enclosed site plan you will see the rear portion of the proposed
garage addition, which would be within the sideyard setback requirement.
With the construction of the houses within this addition and the
irregularly shaped lots, some of the houses were constructed with much
more than a single car garage, so we do have some problems at later
points when people want to add onto their garages to accommodate a
full-eized two car garage.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Approve the variance request to allow construction of a garage
addition within the cideyard setback requirement.
2. Deny the variance request to allow construction of a garage addition
within the sideyard setback.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
City staff recommends approval of the variance request to allow
construction of this garage addition within the sideyard setback
requirement. We have ample room between the proposed garage addition and
the existing residence to the northeast to accommodate utility work
within the utility right-of-way in between this side lot line.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the location of the proposed variance request] copy of the
section in the ordinance dealing with the minimum sidayard setback
requirement.
.3.
A variance request to allow construction
of a garage addition within the sideyard
setback requirement.
Harvey Kendall.
--------------
3-3: 'YARD
REQUIREME.YTS:
[a1
PURPOSE: This section identifies minimum yard
spaces and areas to be provided for in each
-
zoning district.
191
No lot, yard or other open space shall be reduced
in area or dimension so as to make such lot,
yard or open apace leas than the minimum required
by this Ordinance, and if the existing yard
or other open space as existing is leas than
•
the minimum required it shall not be further
reduced. .C:o required open spaca provided around
any building or structure shall be included
as a part of any open apace required for another
at-^uctura.
(C)
all setback distances, as listed in the table
below. shall be measured from the appropriate
lot line, and shall be required minimum distancae.
Front Yard Side yard Rear Yard
A-0 50 30 50
R-1 30 10 30
R-2 30 10 30
R-3 30 20 30
R-4 30 30 30
P2 -R See Chapter 10 for specific regulations.
P2 -M See Chapter 10 for specific regulations.
B-1 30 15 20
B-2 30 10 20
Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard
8-3 30 10 30
B-4 0 0 0
I-1 40 30 40
I-2 so 30 so
In R-1, R-2, B-1 and 8-2 districts, where
adjacent structures excluding accessory
buildings within same block have front
yard setbacks different from those required,
the front yard minimum setback shall be
the average of the adjacent structured.
If there in only one (1) odjacent atructuro,
the front yard minimum setback shall be
the average of the required oar -back and
the setback of the adjacent structure.
In no case shall the minimum front yard
setback exceed thirty (30) feet, except
as provided in Subsection (f1 below.
2. In R-1, R-2, 13-1 and B-2 districts, it
lot is a corner lot, the sidayard setback
shall be not less than twenty (20) feet
from the lot Sins abutting the street right-of-way
line.
D
Planning Commission Agenda - 4/12/88
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ITEM
4. Additional discussion on an upcoming zoning seminar. (G.A.)
on Thursday, May 5, 1988, there is a zoning seminar to be held at the
Sunrood Inn, St. Cloud, Minnesota. As you will note, in the enclosed
supplement is a copy of the agenda for the proposed zoning seminar. City
staff would recommend anyone from the Planning Commission to attend this
zoning seminar if at all possible.
r
iAHQO.L 2I3.LSI0S2I 'noB aoj si ampsul situ,
Z9fSS EW '0T10*T-4UCW
6vnpe0s9 3893 OSZ
1039139TUTWpy 8uju0Z
u0e28puy .CaeO
W1S9 eloseuulW 'Ined 7S
teejzS UUnod ise3 9d
Bulpling 9WseuulW 'ZOZ ellnS
301A83S
ONINIV81
1N3NNa3AOJ
•
BEYOND THE BASICS
FOR PLANNING COMMISSIONERS AND ELECTED
OFFICIALS
MAY S, 1988
SUNWOOD INN, ST. CLOUD
C.j
J
• PRESENTED BY:
GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE
"Beyond the Basics• is...
• An excellent opportunity to enhance your
skillsplanning for development (of any
sixe) in residential and commercial sites,
and conducting public hearings or meetings.
• The next step for anyone familiar with the
basics of sorting and subdivision regula-
tion. (previous attendanco at tho Annual
Planning Institute sponsored by CTS or at
least one year on a planning commission or
governing body is suggested.)
PROGRAM FEATURES
- Hypothetical case studies used throughout
the day to illustrate points
Informative presentations with both
planning and legal perspectives
Entertaining videotape to highlight do's
and don'ts of conductingppublio hearings
Packet of reference me ale designed to
make your job easier
DATEILOCATION
Thursday, May S, 1988
Sunwood Inn
Highway 23 6 4th Ave.
St. Cloud, MN
61? "cII-nRna
South
PROGRAM AGENDA
FACULTY
8:00 a.m. REGISTRATION
IAN TRAQUAIR BALL; Planner and
Attorney; Rasmussen Ball
PLANNING FOR DEVELOPMENT (Of An Sizel)
Y
GUISBERG; PlanningDirector;
8:30 • Some definitions
Consolidated Planning Depart-
* Nov tools relate to each other
went, Rochester/Olmsted County
• Limits of authority; due process,
FRANK KUNDRAT; Attorney; Hall,
other legal issues
Byers, Hanson, Steil 6
• Role of comprehensive plan;
Weinberger, St. Cloud
standards
JOHN SHARDLOW; Vice President;
• Public and private sector
Dahlgren, Shardlow and Uban,
perspectives
Inc. (Institute Presider)
10:00 a.m. BREAK
II 7
10:20 • Presentation of hypothetical cases
• Focused small group discussions on
specific issues involved in consi-
dering residential and commercial
development
12:00-1:00 p.m. LUNCHEON
CONDUCTING PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS
1:00 Groundrulos:
• Difforancog/purpoues of public
meetings
• Legal reguiremantu
• How to's
• Roles of chair, staff
• Making findl::gu
• pr000ntation of videotaped public
hoar ing
2:15 p.m. REFRESHMENT BREAK
3:00 Analysts of tho Videotape
Applying principlcu to caao atudiou
(prouentod in tho morning)
4:00 p.m. AD3011RN
VUI2T ER INI�OI�MATION
Contact Sandi Huglund (Rogiotratlun) or
Vivian Hart (Program) at GTU 612/222-7409 or
Minnesota Toll Free 9nn/652-9719.
WHO SI-1pULD t% I 1 EINU.
Members of planning commissions,
boards of adjustment/appeals and
governing bodies in Minnesota
cities, counties and townships.
REGISTRATION/
C=ANCELLATION
Tho 965 per person registration
includes lunch, refreshment
brooks and handout matorials.
Re gg later by Tuesday, April 26
using the attached form. A full
rnfund of thn f will bn mAdn
only if thn raalrtratinn U
ganrnllnd- xr�r/;;pgflayn in
adv_aam_aj. tho P VaLr m. sub-
stitutos for regiotered partici-
pants may be maga at any tima.
ANOU'I' GTS
Govornnont Training Survice is a
puulic, joint powers organization
whose Mouton iu to moot the
changing m4nagonunt and loodor-
uhip nooda of polls makora, utatf
and appoinKod officials by
providing lnnovativo, cumprohon-
vivo,ppractical trainin and
aonoultIng8 to publiclylindod
oryanizatiuno in 1linnm ota.
ItIlG I STRAT 1 0 H
HEYOND THE 6A61CU: AN INSTITUTU FOR CIT12EN I'LAIRIEItU
ThurLday, May B, 1988
sunwuud Inn, St. Cloud, MN
Noma, _ _ Daytime Mono
IPloauo print or typo)
Addrouu_ Clty/etoto/2i11
7urladfotJon Title. _ How Long in puuition
_ EACI0004 ie 6651peruoaloyyable to Govornnont Training sorvlco
-0111 we (165 plus $3 billing charge)
Fleaue mail to Government Training Borvico, 202 Minnouuto building,
16 coot Fourth street, at. Paul MN 89101
kjW"=_j ( ""air. nuts ii.. im f� x yea
PROGRAM AGENDA
FACULTY
800 a.m. REGISTRATION
IAN TRAQUAIR BALL; Planner and
Attorney; Rasmussen i Ball
PLANNING FOR DEVELOPMENT (Of Any Size()
GUNNAR ISBERG; Planning Director;
8:30 • Some definitions
Consolidated Planning Depart-
• How tools relate to each other
ment, Rochester/Olmsted County
• Limits of authority; due process,
FRANK KUNDRAT; Attorney; Hall,
other legal issues
Byers, Hanson, Steil i
• Role of comprehensive plant
Weinberger, St. Cloud
standards
JOHN SBARDLOW1 Vice President;
• Public and private sector
Dahlgren, Shardlow and Oban,
perspectives
Inc. (Institute Presider)
10:00 a.m. BREAK
10:20 • Presentation of hypothetical cases
• Focused small group discussions on
specific issues involved in consi-
dering residential and commercial
development
12x00-1:00 p.m. LUNCHEON
CONDUCTING PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS
1:00 Groundrules:
• Differences/purposes of public
meetings
• Legal requirements
• How to's
• Roles of chair, staff
• Making findings
• Presentation of videotaped public
hearing
2:45 p.m. REFRESHMENT BREAK
3:00 Analysis of the Videotape
Applying principles to'case studies
(presented in the morning)
4:00 p.m. ADJOURN
FURTHER INFORMATION
Contact Sandi Hoglund (Registration) or
Vivian Hart (Program) at GTS 612/222-7409 or
Minnesota Toll Free 800/652-9719.
WHO SHOULD ATTEND.
Members of planning commissions,
boards of adjustment/appeals and
governing bodies in Minnesota
cities, counties and townships.
REGISTRATION/
CANCELLATION
The $65 per person registration
includes lunch, refreshment
breaks and handout materials.
Register by Tuesday, April 26
using the attached form. A full
canceilea 3 w�rrz_na aays in
advance of the oroaram. Sub-
stitutes for registered partici-
pants may be made at any time.
ABOUT GTS
Government Training Service is a
public, joint powers organization
whose mission is to meet the
changing management and leader-
ship needs of policymakers, staff
and appointed officials by
providing innovative, comprehen-
sive, practical training and
consulting to ppublicly-funded
organizations in Minnesota.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
R E G I S T R A T I O N
BEYOND THE BASICSt AN INSTITUTE FOR CITIZEN PLANNERS
Thursday, May 5, 1988
Sunwood Inn, St. Cloud, MN
Name
(Please print or type)
Address
Daytime Phone (_)
City/State/Zip
Jurisdiction Title How Long in Position
_Enclosed is 169/person payable to Government Training Service
_Bill me (169 plus 13 billing charge)
Please mail to Government hTrainingStreet Service, .Pau 202 Minnesota Building
16 East Fourth Street, 8t. Paul, MN 99101
R►aister by Tuesday. Aori1 26. 1988 '�