Planning Commission Agenda Packet 01-02-1990AGENDA
RtI'Qa LAR MEETING - MONfICELI.O PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, January 2, 1990 - 7:30 p.m.
Members: Dan McConnon, Mori Malone, Richard Martie, Cindy Lem, Richard
Carlson
7:30 p.m.
1. Call to order.
7:32 p.m.
2. Election of Planning Commission Chairperson and Vice
Chairperson.
7:37 p.m.
3. Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held November 7,
1989.
7:39 p.m.
4. Approval of minutes of the special meeting held November 13,
1989.
7:41 p.m.
5. Public hearing - A conditional use request to allow a 4-plex
in an R-2 (single and two family residential) zone. A
variance request which would allow two zero lot lire
duplexes. A variance request to allow two zero lot lire
duplex residential lots to have less than the minimum lot
square footage and lot frontage. Applicant, Lanners Custom
Homes.
b 8:01 P.M.
6. Consideration to approve a resolution for the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority's modified redevelopment plan to
redevelop Project No. 1, modified tax increment financing
plans for tax increment financing District Nos. 1-1 through
1-8, and tax increment financing District No. 1-9.
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION ITEMS
8:11 P.M.
1. A variance request to allow a residential subdivision lot to
have less than the minimum lot frontage on a public
right-of-way. Applicant, West Prairie Partners. Council
actions No action required, as request did not came before
thea. City Council approved final plat for the Prairie west
Addition.
8:13 p.m.
2. A request to allow expansion of an existing mobile hams
park. Applicant, Don Heikes. Council action: Approved as
per Planning Commission recomomdation.
ails P.M.
3. A conditional use request to allow a tri-plex in an R-2
(single aid two family residential) zone. Applicant, Brad
and Cindy Fyle. Council action: Approved as per Planning
Commission recommendation with two additional off-street
parking spaces required off of Maple Street.
Planning Commission Agenda
January 2, 1990
Page 2
8:17 p.m. 4. A simple subdivision request to allow a B-3 (highway
business) commercial lot to be subdivided into two commercial
lots. A variance request to allow a zero lot line setback
requirement. Applicant, The Lincoln Companies. Council
action: Approved as per Planning Comaission reoomnndation.
8:19 P.M. 5. Set the next tentative date for the Monticello Planning
Commission for Tuesday, February 6, 1990, 7:30 p.m.
8:21 p.m. 6. Adjournment.
MINDTES
SPECIAL MEECING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION
Monday, November 13, 1989 - 6:30 p.m.
Members Present: Richard Carlson, Richard Martie, and Cindy Lem.
Members Absent: Mori Malone and Dan MoConnon
Staff Present: Gary Anderson and Jeff O'Neill
1. The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Richard Carlson at
6:33 p.m.
2. Motion by Cindy Lean, seconded by Richard Martie, to approve the minutes
of the regular meeting held September 5, 1989. Motion carried
unanimously, with Mori Malone and Dan McConnon absent.
3. Motion by Richard Martie, seconded by Cindy Lemm, to approve the minutes
of the special meeting held September 11, 1989. Motion carried
unanimously, with Mori Malone and Dan McConnon absent.
4. Public hearing - a simple subdivision remnest to allow a B-3 (highwav
business) to be subdivided into two commercial lots. A variance request
to allow a zero lot line setback requirement. Applicant, The Lincoln
Companies.
Mr. Jeff O'Neill, Assistant City Administrator, explained to Planning
Commission members The Lincoln Caapanies simple subdivision request.
Mr. O'Neill explained The Lincoln Companies, with the proposed expansion
of the K -Mart facilities, is requesting to simple subdivide a simple
subdivision of an unplatted tract of B-3 (highway business) land to
accomodate a separate legal description for the neva K -Mart facility. By
the creation of this simple subdivision, in the interim, which will
eventually, prior to building permit application, a proposed commercial
subdivision plat of this entire unplatted tract of area and the existing
plat of the mall be designed into a commercial subdivision plat. To
accomodate the financial commitments of their Lincoln Companies lender,
they are required to create two seperate tracts of land to accomodate
their financing. Also, as part of their simple subdivision request,
there is a variance request to allow a zero lot lino setback
requirement. with the proposed K -Mart facility to be completely detached
from the existing mall, there will be a zero lot lino setback for the new
K -Mart facility when it is constructed on this now proposed lot line.
The existing mall will have an expanded covered walkway to extend out to
moot the now K -Mart facility. Chairperson Richard Carlson then closed
the public hearing portion of the proposed simple subdivision and
variance request and opened up for any input from the Planning Commission
msio . ra that were present.
With no further questions from the Planning Commission members, on a
motion by Richard Martie, seconded by Cindy Lamm to approve the simple
subdivision request to allow a B-3 (highway business) commercial lot to
be subdivided into 2 commercial lots. Also, to approve the variance
request to allow a zero lot line setback requirement. Motion carriod
unanimously, with Mori Malone and Dan McConnon absent.
I
Planning Commission Minutes - 11/13/89
S. Motion was made by Richard Martie, seconded by Cindy Germ to adjourn the
meeting. The meeting adjourned at 6:57 p.m.
Respectfully submitted:
Zoning Administrator
z
LL
Planning Commission Agenda - 1/2/90
v
Four-plex Site Plan Review
Under R-2 (single and two family residential) zoning, under the conditional use
section, a 4 unit dwelling unit is an allowable use, only as a conditional
use.
1. Building setbacks - met or exceeded.
2. fond square footage - land square f000tage for a 4-plex is exceeded
by 2,780 square feet.
3. Condition under the off street parking - parking meets requirement.
4. Curbing under a 4-plex designation - as it is a multiple family
unit, it does require continuous, nonsur mountable curbing.
5. Hard surfacing - a 4-plex requires all parking and driving areas to
be hard surfaced.
6. Driveway setback - driveway setback requirement is met at the
mdnimxm.
7. Dwelling unit square footage requirement - for a 4-plex, a minimum of
720 square feet of unit area for a 2 bedroom apartment, and for a
duplex, a minimum of 864 square feet for a 2 bedroom unit. The
developer is showing 1,080 square feet of unit area for a 2 bedroom
unit.
Two Duplex Site Plan Review
1. Building setbacks - If one interprets the structures as being two
duplexes, a variance would be needed to allow the zero lot lino.
2. A duplex in the R-2 zone requires 12,000 square feet. Each lot
possesses 10,890 square feet, therefore, a variance is needed.
3. Parking complies.
4. Nonnsurmountable curbing not required.
5. Hardsurfacing required.
6. Driveway setback meets minimum.
Ebur-plex - Conditional Use Permit
If Planning Commisaion interprets the proposal as a 4-plex, a conditional use
permit is needed.
2
Planning Commission Agenda - 1/2/90
As part of the procedure for the conditional use request, the Planning
Commission shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed conditional
use. Its judgements shall be based upon (but not limited to) the following
factors:
1. Relationship to the municipal comprehensive plan.
2. The geographical area involved.
3. Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in
which it is proposed.
4. The character of the surrounding area.
5. The demonstrated need for such use.
Planning Commission is asked to consider those five factors as the site plan is
discussed on Tuesday. At that time, we will be asking the questions that will
assist in determining the possible adverse effects of the proposed conditional
use request on properties located in the R-2 (single and two family
residential) zone.
Two Duplexes - Variance Requests
If Planning Commission interprets the site to consist of two duplexes with a
zero lot line setback, then a variance to the setback requirement is needed as
well as a variance to the square footage requirement.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS - FOUR-PLEX:
lA. To approve a conditional use request to allow a 4-plex in an R-2 (single
and two family residential) zone subject to conditions defined byd the
Planning Comnission.
1B. To deny a conditional use request to allow a 4-plex in an R-2 (single and
two family residential) zone.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS - DUPLEX:
2A. To approve a variance request which would allow two zero lot line
duplexes.
2B. To deny a variance request which would allow two zero lot line duplexes.
3A. To approve a variance request to allow two zero lot line duplex
residential lots to have lass than tho minimum lot square footage and lot
frontage.
3B. To deny a variance request to allow two zero lot line duplex residential
lots to have less than the minimum lot square footage and lot frontage.
E5
Planning Commission Agenda - 1/2/90
V C. STAFF ne—..&. a-,TION:
City staff concerns are as follows:
1. Density. Pour family units on 2 single family lots in an area
surrounded mostly by single family housing may not be consistent with
the character and geography of the area.
2. With the layout as presented, recognizing that each zero lot line
duplex is to have its own driveway, should there be consideration for
elimination for one of these driveways? If Planning Commission
wishes to define this development as a 4-plea, then a condition could
include development of a single driveway access.
3. With the the proposed two zero lot line duplexes to be created on
these two residential single family lots, would there be any
devaluation of the existing propoerties which surround this proposed
project? If so, variance on conditional use permit should be
denied.
4. Are we setting a precedent by creation of a zero lot line 4-plex in
other areas - could we be creating a bad situation?
D. SUPPORTING DATAt
Copy of the location of the proposed conditional use request., copy of the site
plan for the conditional use request, copy of the 2 front elevations for the
proposed zero lot line duplexes, copy of the lower level and upper level floor
plans for the proposed zero lot line duplexes, copy of the zoning ordinance
sections in regards to minimax requirements, and dwelling unit definitions.
A conditional use request to allow
c a 6 -plea in an R-2 (single and two
'• IQ family residential) zone. A request
/• •• _ . V F ivids proposed 4-plex into two
�' �,• ./ : R ze - ,- line duplexes. A variance
• / • /�, •/. r ueaY' t - for tr0 zero lot line duplex
°'O• i idantiel 10 to have less than the
mum lot square footage and lot frontage.
STOM 9
/ T // -��// • CRA
• `J / X19' �41'•�''�; °�� ..,/ \ - _
411
� ; ____i ��.��': ,/�`'tet/ , \ .( `•/ / ` ��•: 4� • /j_+\
GV
M. 915
o
eo
•�� .r
• syn ,w�
/,��^��.
' ��
j G,i ;µt �ASL�ut 1
. ,�
,ae- .,' "b•+.. -tee' }� /— JaS - -
YTN STREET S4GHT EASUVAIT
�� UTILITrEpSfMEYT
100
I �6'��ATibt7-j
r
71
If
146.
6
P
10-7-1
SECTION:
7-1:
7-2:
7-7:
7-a:
7-1:
7-2:
7-l:
7-a:
10-7-4
CHAPTER 7
'R-2• SINGLE AND TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
Purpose
Permitted Uses
Permitted Accessory Uses
Conditional Uses
PURPOSE: The purpose of the "R-2• Single and Two
Pamily Residential District is to provide for low
to moderate density one and two unit dwellings and
directly related, complementary uses.
PERMITTED USES: The following are permitted uses
in a •R-21 District:
(A] All permitted uses allowed in a 'R-1" District.
(B] Two family dwelling units.
PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES: The following are permitted
accessory uses in a •R-2" District:
(A] All acceasory uses as allowed in an •R-1• Dintrict.
CONDITIONAL U§U The following are conditional uses
in an •R-2• District: (RequUaea a condi,U:onat use
peuLU based upon p4oceda4ea set 6oVA ;n and Regutated
by Chaptea YY o6 th,ia Ondi.nance).
(A) All conditional uses, subject to the same conditions,
as allowed in an •R-11 District.
(e) Townhouses as defined by Chapter 2, Section 2 (TB]
of this Ordinance provided that the regulations
and requirements of Chapter 20 are satisfactorily
completed and met.
(C) Four family dweilina unit.
(D) Day Care - group nursery provided that:
1. No overnight facilities are provided for
the children served. Children are delivered
and camoved daily.
2. The front yard depth shall be a minimum
of thirty-five (25) feet.
7. Adequate off-street parking and access
is provided in compliance with Chapter
2, Section S of this Ordinance.
1. Clothes line pole and vire.
I
2. Recreational equipment and vehicles.
3. Construction and landscaping material currently
being used on the promises.
4. Off-street parking of passenger vehicles
and trucks not exceeding a gross capacity
of nine thousand (9,000) pounds in residential
areas.
5. propane tanks, fuel oil tanks, and other
similar residential heating fuel storage
tanks which do not exceed 1,000 gallons
in capacity and shall not be located within
five (5) feet of any property line.
6. Wood piles in which wood is stored for
fuel provided that not more than 10 cords
shall be stored on any property. A cord
shall be 4- x 4' x S-. All wood piles
shall be five (5) feet or more from rear
and aide yard property linea and shall
be stored behind the appropriate not back
line in front yards.
7. Solar heating oystema.
3-3: YW REQUIREMENTS:
(A) PURPOSE: This section identifies minimum yard
spaces and areas to be provided for in each
zoning district.
(e) No lot, yard or other open apace shall be reduced
In area or dimension so as to maks such lot,
yard or open space leas than the minimum required
by this Ordinance, and if the existing yard
or other open space as existing is lass than
the minimum required it shall not be further
reduced. bb required open space provided around
any building or structure s)ull be included
as a part of any opon space required for another
structure.
(C) All setback distances, as listed In the table
below, shall be measured from the appropriate
lot line, and shall be required minieum distances.
Front Yard Side yard Rear Yard
A-0 50 30 50
R-1 30 10 30
r' R -i 3n In 30
114► R-3 30 20 30
R-4 30 30 30
PZ -A See Chapter 10 for specific regulations.
PZ -14 Sae Chapter 10 for specific regulations.
8-1 30 15 20
1 N
e[
8-2 30 10 20
�+
In addition, each condominium unit shall
have the minimum lot area for the type
of housing unit and usable open space
as specified in the Area and Building
Size Regulations of this Ordinance. Such
lot areae may be controlled by an individual
or joint ownership.
[F] In residential districts, where the adjacent
structures exceed the mini -um setbacks
established in Subsection (C] above, the
minimum setback shall be thirty (30) feet
plus two-thirds (2/3) of the difference:
between thirty (30) feet and the setback
or average setback of adjacent structures
within the same block.
3-4: ARIA AND BUILDING SIZE REGULATIONS:
[A1 PURPOSE: This section identifies minimum
area and building size requirements to
be provided in each zoning district as
listed in the table below.
DISTRICT IAT AREA LOT WIDTH BUILDING HEIGHT
A-0 2 acres 200 N/A
R-1 12,000 80 24
R-2 HIP" BO 2�
R-3 10,000 8o 2
R-4 48,000 200 1
PZ -R 12,000 80 2%
PZ -M 12,000 80 2
B-1 8,000 So 2
B-2 N/A 100 2
B-3 N/A 100 2
B-4 N/A N/A 2
1-1 20,000 100 2
1-2 30,000 100 2
1. The building height limitation in an
R-3, PZ -M, B-1, S-2, B-3, 9-4, I-1,
and I-2 coning districts shall be
two (2) stories.
2. In zoning districts R-3. PZ -M, 8-1,
B-2, B-3, B-4, I-1, and I-2, a (3)
three story building may be allowed
as • conditional use contingent upon
strict application of a requirement
that fire -extinguishing systema be
nt Installed throughout the building.
y (RegiLiw a concUVoeat use ptaaut
bd0ed upon P4OCedu4e4 W JOVA 4M
dnd aegu&ted by Chdpte)t It oQ this
oidb ancel.
O
EBI LOT AREA PER UNIT:
Single Family
12,000 square feet
Two -Family
6-000 eauare feet
Townhouse
5,000 square feet
Mobile Home
4,000 square feet
MaltiDle_ Family
10.000 eauare feet
on the baAiA o6 the totat aaea in the
99 first unit D tan
2,000 sq. ft. for-:
each additional one
bedroom unit, plus
eagh additional Luse
pedrAe +,,J.
Elderly Housing 1,000 square feet
(The Cot aaea pea unit aequ.inanent boa
townhouaea, condominiedma and ptanned
unit deveLopmenta ahatt be calculated
on the baAiA o6 the totat aaea in the
paojer-t and as contaotted by an individua.0
and joint oameaahip).
(C]
UTILITY TRANSITION AREAS: All areas in
which saver is not currently available
shall be designated as Utility Transition
Areas. The minimum lot area of any platted
lot in such areas shall be two and one-half (2y)
acres. Any lot platted according to the
provisions of this subdivision, may be
replotted provided that public sanitary
saver will be made available and all condition
and provisions of this Ordinance are met.
(D]
USEABLE OPEN SPACE: Each multiple family
dwelling site shall contain at least five
hundred (500) square feat of useable open
space as defined in Chapter 2 of this
Ordinance for each dwelling unit contained
thereon.
(E]
EXCEPTIONS: The building height limits
established herein for districts shall
not apply to the following:
1. Belfries
2. Chimneys or flues
1. Church spires
4. Cooling towers
5. Cupolas and domes which do not contain useable
space.
6. Elevator penthouses
7. Flag poles
B. Monuments
9. Parapet walls .standing not more than
three (l) feet above the limiting
height of the building
10. Water rousse
5
11: poles, Lovers and other structures for essential servi
12. Necessary mechanical and electrical
appurtenances
13. Television and radio antennas not
exceeding twenty (20) feet above
roof.
14. Wind electrical generators
IB) No excluded roof equipment or structural
element extending beyond the limited height
Of a building may occupy more than tventy-five (25)
percent of the area of such roof not to
exceed ten (10) feet unless otherwise noted.
1. ONE AND/ORo,*w^, waYTZY ^ _ a AND
TOWNHOUSES: The mi..+a+�. !loot eras
!ser eech tyge b.Sl At- -hall bm a
(_) One Story Dwelling -. 960 square feet.
(b) Two Story Dwelling - 750 square Leet per story.
(e) EXCEPTION: The ainilatm equate
600tage o6 a one atwty bu,i,Cding
may be aedueed to 863 4quaae
deet i6 a garage is added with
at teaet 336 aquane beet. In
no ease, howeve4, 4hatt the n4nbwm
dimenu�on o6 that garage be te44
than 1/ beet.
2. Mjj�WLE DWELLING UNIVU Except for
elderly housing. living units classifi,A
a_q_6"tlole dwsllinaa shall have the
following minim'_ floor areas OU
MIS;
(a) Efficiency Units $00 square lest
(b) One Bedroom Unita 600 square feet
Lu in BedroomUnita- 720 square feet
(d) More Than Two Bedroom Units -An additional 100
square feet for each
additional bedroom
3. ELDERLY (SENIOR CITIZEN) sOUSINO:
t11 Living units classified as elderly
(senior citizen) housing units shall
have the following minimum floor areas
per Unit:
(a) Efficiency Units 440 Square
(b1 nn* Ssdroc+n 1?0 Srtuara
Except in the case of single, two
family and townhouse dwellings, parking
area design which requires backing
into the public street is prohibited.
(d) No curb cut access shall be located
less than forty (40) feet from the
intersection of two (2) or more street
sight -of -rays. This distance shall
be measured from the intersection
of lot lines.
(e) Except in the case of single family,
two family and townhouse dwellings,
parking areas and their aisles shall
be developed in compliance with the
following sandards:
(f) No curb cut access shall exceed twenty -lour (24)
feet in width.
(1 Curb cut openings and drivewaysAhAl1
bd nt„p,g&nP�um three (3) feet from
Qg„oido vard orgoerty line in residential
diatricte and five (5) feet from the
side yard lot line in business or
industrial districts.
(h) Driveway access curb openings on a
public street except for single, two
family and townhouse dwellings shall
not be located leas than forty (40)
feet from one another.
(i) The grade elevation of any parking
area shall not exceed five (5) percent.
(J) Bach property shall be allowed one (1) curb cut per
one hundred twenty-five (125) feet
of street frontage. All property
r shall be entitled to at least one (1)
curb cut. Single family uses shall be limited
to one (1) curb cut access per property.
(� S{RrdCUM: All, are" intended tq
¢e�li•odfor corking apse end_
dr Vevey sh sur ac w materials O
sui le to control dust and drainave.
•
WALL
WALL TO
INTERZ= To
TO
INTERLOC(
INTEMOC(
A:T.LE
MIRIMM
MININ10
MIAIMUM
30
48.6'
44.51
. 40.3-
43
56.8'
53.41
50.0'
60
62.0'
59.71
57.41
90
66.01
64.01
64.01
Parallel
Parking
: Twenty-two (22) foot in length.
(f) No curb cut access shall exceed twenty -lour (24)
feet in width.
(1 Curb cut openings and drivewaysAhAl1
bd nt„p,g&nP�um three (3) feet from
Qg„oido vard orgoerty line in residential
diatricte and five (5) feet from the
side yard lot line in business or
industrial districts.
(h) Driveway access curb openings on a
public street except for single, two
family and townhouse dwellings shall
not be located leas than forty (40)
feet from one another.
(i) The grade elevation of any parking
area shall not exceed five (5) percent.
(J) Bach property shall be allowed one (1) curb cut per
one hundred twenty-five (125) feet
of street frontage. All property
r shall be entitled to at least one (1)
curb cut. Single family uses shall be limited
to one (1) curb cut access per property.
(� S{RrdCUM: All, are" intended tq
¢e�li•odfor corking apse end_
dr Vevey sh sur ac w materials O
sui le to control dust and drainave.
14
Except in the case of single family
and two family dwellings, driveways
and stalls shall be surfaced with
six (6) inch class five base and two (2)
inch bituminous topping or concrete
equivalent. plans for surfacing and
drainage of driveways and stalls for
five (5) or more vehicles shall be
submitted to the City Engineer for
his review and the final drainage
plan shall be subject to his written
approval.
(1) STRIDING: Except for single, two
family and townhouses, all parking
stalls shall be marked with white
painted lines not lose than four (6)
inches wide.
(m) LIGHTING: Any lighting used to illuminate
an off-street parking area shall be
so arranged as to reflect the light
away from adjoining property, abutting
residential uses and public right-of-ways
and be in compliance with Chapter 7,
Section 2, (G] and (H] of this Ordinance.
(n) SIGNS: No sign shall be so located
as to restrict the eight lines and
orderly operation and traffic movement
within any parking lot.
CURSING AND LANDSCAPING: Except for
single, two family and townhouses,
all omen o� eLeet ee+fin .h.»
have a perimeter curb barrier arpWW
the entire- parking lot, said curb
barmier shell not be closer than five (5)
ta1t t__a6Y--L- UA@— S "L platings
QLsurtecinq^maW"7,_she_ 11 beDCQVi�.
in all area& bprdp•4• •h- �Ggkjpg
ASAAi
(p) REQUIRED SCREENING: All open, non-residential,
off-street parking areas of five (5)
or more spaces shall be screened and
landscaped from abutting or surrounding
residential districts in compliance
with Chapter 7, Section 2 of this
Ordinance.
Z
3. There shall be no off-street parking within
fifteen (IS) fact of any street surface.
6. The boulevard portion of the street right-of-way
shall not be used for parking.
S. SETBACK AREA: Required accessory off-street
parking shall not be provided in front
yards, or in side yards in the case of
a corner lot, in R-1, R-2, R-3, PZ, and s-1
districts.
6. In the case of single family, two family
and townhouse dwellings parking shall be
prohibited in any portion of the front
yard except designated driveways leading
directly into a garage or one (1) open,
surfaced space located on:the side of a
driveway, away from the principal use.
Said extra space shall be surfaced with
concrete or bituminous material.
[G1 USE OF REQUIRED AREA: Required accessory off-street
parking spaces in any district shall not be
utilized for open storage, sale or rental of
goods, storage of inoperable vehicles as regulated
by Chapter 3, Section 2 [M) of this Ordinance,
and/or storage of snow.
(Hl NUMBER OF SPACES REQUIRED: The following minimum
number of off-street parking spaces shall be
provided and maintained by ownership, easement
and/or lease for and during the life of the
rospective uses hereinafter eat forth.
J.0 SINGLE FAMILY, TWO FA AJ AND TOWNHOUSE
Ut=: Two (2) spaces per unit.
2. BOARDING HOUSE, FRATERNITY HOUSE, SORORITY
HOUSE: At least two (2) parking spaces
for each three (3) persons for whom accommodationa
are provided for sleeping.
MIILTIP W r*.v n_�_t_**n n. At least two (2)
eff-.`r.et rw�nn .e„�wa ser ..it A Lw
one (1) enclosed soac• ner twro,t2f unite.
<. PUBLIC PARKS, PLAYGROUNDS AND PLA! ►IELD:
At least five (S) parking spaces for each
acre of park over one (1) acre: two (2)
n parking spaces per acre for playgrounds,
and ten (10) apacca of each aur* of play
field.
O
' [DM]
DWELLING, MULTIPLE (APARTMENT): A building designed
with three (3) or more dwelling units exclusively for
i
occupancy by three (3) or more families living independently
of each other but sharing hallways and main entrances
and exits.
(DN]
DWELLING, SINGLE-FAMILY: A detached dwelling unit designed
exclusively for occupancy by one (1) family.
- (DO]
DWELLING, TWO-FAMILY: A dwelling designed exclusively
for occupancy by two (2) families living independently
of each other.
1. DOUBLE BUNGALOW: A two-family dwelling with two (2)
units side by aide.
2. DUPLEX: A two-family dwelling with one (1) unit above
the other.
(DP]
DWELLING UNIT: A residential building or portion thereof
intended for occupancy by a family but not including
hotels, motels, nursing homes, seasonal cabins, boarding
or rooming houses, tourist homes or trailers.
(EA]
ELDERLY (SENIOR CITIZEN) HOUSING: A public agency owned,
controlled or financed multiple dwelling building with
open occupancy limited to persons over fifty-five (55).
(EB]
EFFICIENCY APARTMENT: A dwelling unit consisting of
-ons (1) principal room exclusive of bathroom, hallway,
closets, or dining alcove, and has limited provisiono
for cooking (kitchenette).
(EC]
ESSENTIAL SERVICES: The erection, construction, alteration,
or maintenance of underground or overhead gas, electrical,
■team, or water transmission or distribution systema,
collection, communication, supply or disposal systems
by public utilities, municipal or other governmental
agencies, but not including buildings.
(ED]
EQUAL DECREE OF ENCROACHMENT: A method of determining
the location of encroachment lines so that floodwaters
flow. This is determined by considering the affect
of encroachment on the hydraulic efficiency of the flood
plain along both sides of a stream for a significant
reach.
(FA]
FAMILY: One (1) or more parsons each related to the
other by blood, marriage, adoption, or foster care,
or a group of not more than five (5) persons not so
related maintaining a common household and using common
,'7
cooking and kitchen facilities.
(FB]
FAMILY Of ORIGIN - Mother, father, brother, sister,
son, daughter, grandmother, grandfather.
Planning Commission Agenda - 1/2/90
6. Consideration to approve a resolution for the Housing and Redevelopment
AuthoritX,s Modified Redevelo�xnelt Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1,
ModRied Tax Increment Financing Plans for tax incrmeni financing Districts
Nos. 1-1 through 1-8, and Tax Increment Financing Plan for tax increment
financing District No. 1-9.
At the December 6, 1989 HRA meeting, Mr. Russ Martie presented to the
Commission preliminary building plans for his original proposed approximate
7,000 square foot structure in the Oakwood Industrial Park; retail agricultural
display area of 2,300 square feet, and cold storage of 4,800 square feet.
Proposed increment could satisfy an approximate $11,000 up -front assistance for
land write down over eight years.
Mr. Martie indicated to the FOA that the project would proceed without the TIF
assistance, however, the FOIA is considerate of assisting local small businesses
to expand. The HRA's motion was to assist Mr. Martie with the TIF option,
pay-as-you-go, at 82,500 over 7 years, or a total of $17,500. This option
provides greater dollar asistance to the developer, however, the developer does
his initial up -front financing and provides the FOA with no bonding fees or no
capitalized interest, therefore, it may be considered a cash flow deal. The
motion was contingent upon an additional 48 feet to the cold storage area to
increase the ratio of cold storage to retail display, as the TIF policy is for
industrial or non-competitive commercial use. It has not been the FOIA policy
to assist oammercial land write dam, but for public improvements associated
with a commercial project. Due to the fact that recent potential new
industries are concerned with the aesethic value of the Industrial Park, the
FOA further requested that proper screening be placed at the cold storage and
outside storage areas. Mr. Martie agreed to the contingencies. Planning
Commission please note that the proposed retail/commercial business is in a I-2
(Heavy Industrial) zone.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. To approve the resolution for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority's
Modified Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1, Modified Tax
Increment Financing Plans for tax increment financing Districts Nos. 1-1
through 1-8, and Tax Increment Financing Plan for tax increment financing
District No. 1-9.
2. To deny approval of the resolution for the Housing aro Redevelopment
Authority's Modified Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1,
Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans for tax increment financing
Districts Nos. 1-1 through 1-8, and Tax Increment Financing Plan for tax
increment financing District No. 1-9.
C. STAFF RlY1AgMMTION%
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the resolution based on
the submitted plans, inclusive of the FOA contingencies, and that said plans
LA are consistent with the Monticello Comprehensive Plan.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of resolution. Copy of site plan.
RESOLUTION OF THE MONTICELLO PLANNING
COMMISSION FINDING THE HOUSING AND
W REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY'S MODIFIED
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT NO. 1, MODIFIED TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING PLANS FOR TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING DISTRICTS NOS. 1-1 THROUGH
1-8, AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-9,
ALL LOCATED WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
NO. 1, TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE CITY.
WHEREAS; the Housing and Redevelopment Authority's Modified
Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1, Modified Tax
Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts
Nos. 1-1 through 1-8, and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for
Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-9 (the 'Plans•), all
located within Redevelopment Project No. 1, have been submitted
to the Monticello Planning Commission, Pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.0271 and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said Plans to
determine the consistency of said Plans to the Comprehensive
Plan of the•City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BF IT RESOLVED, BY THE MONTICELLO PLANNING
COMMISSION,• that the Plans are consistent with the Monticello
Comprehensive Plan, and the Commission recommends approval of the
Plans to the Monticello City Council.
Adoptedt January 2, 1990
Chairman
Attestt
N